Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03531/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03531-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

Ronald D. Foreman, Esq. (SBN 61148) 

FOREMAN & BRASSO 

2 

930 Montgomery Street, Suite 600 

San Francisco, CA 94133 

3 

Tel: (415) 433-3475 

Fax: (415) 781-8030 

4 Email: foremanandbrasso@foremanandbrasso.com 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Attorney for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

Diamond Imports, Inc. and Yair Y achdav 

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

KAPU GEMS and KAPU GEMS LTD., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC. and YAIR 

YACHDAV, 

Defendants. 

DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC., 

Counterclaimant, 

vs. 

KAPU GEMS, KAPU GEMS LTD, 

KALPESH V AGHANI, 

Counterdefendants. 

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03531-MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING KAPU 

GEMS' MOTION TO AMEND THE 

PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), and (d) 

Civil Local Rule 6-3( a) 

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

PlaintiffKapu Gems having moved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(d) and USDC Norther 

District of California Civil Local Rule 6-3(a) to amend the Pretrial Preparation Order to exten 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-03531-MMC Document 127 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the time to move for summary judgment on the counterclaim for misappropriation of trad 

secrets in Defendant Diamond Imports' First Amended Counterclaim for Damages to Januar 

11, 2017; 

Kapu Gems having failed to demonstrate good cause to amend the Pretrial Preparatio 

Order to extend the time to move for summary judgment on the counterclaim fo 

misappropriation of trade secrets until January 11, 2017; 

FOR GOOD CAUSE, IT HEREBY ORDERED that Kapu Gems' motion to amend 

the Pretrial Preparation Order is denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE UNITED 

STATES DISTRICT COURT 

for the reasons stated by defendants in their opposition, ^

_________________ IS^

December 15, 2016 ,

Case 3:15-cv-03531-MMC Document 127 Filed 12/15/16 Page 2 of 2