Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00136/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00136-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 448
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Education
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

JOINT STIP. RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING Jay T., et al. v. SCUSD

SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON Case No.2:16-cv-00136-MCE-DB

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LOZANO SMITH

One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050

Sloan R. Simmons, SBN 233752

ssimmons@lozanosmith.com

Sarah L. Garcia, State Bar No. 233814

sgarcia@lozanosmith.com

LOZANO SMITH

One Capitol Mall, Suite 640

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 329-7433

Facsimile: (916) 329-9050

Attorneys for Defendant

SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED 

SCHOOL DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAY T. and ANNE M.-T., individually, and as 

guardian ad litem for M.M.-T.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-DB

JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION 

OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER 

THEREON 

Case 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-DB Document 25 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 4
JOINT STIP. RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING Jay T., et al. v. SCUSD 

SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON Case No. 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-DB

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LOZANO SMITH

One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, by and between 

PLAINTIFFS Jay T. and Anne M.-T., individually, and as guardian ad litem for M.M.-T. (“Plaintiffs”), 

through their counsel of record, and DEFENDANT Sacramento City Unified School District (“District”

and referred to with Plaintiffs as, “Parties”), through its counsel of record, as follows:

1. On May 16, 2016, the parties agreed, via stipulation, to the following briefing and 

hearing schedule: (a) Plaintiffs’ Opening Memorandum to be filed on or before July 22, 2016;

(b) District’s Opposition Memorandum to be filed on or before August 19, 2016; (c) Plaintiff’s Reply 

Brief to be filed within fourteen days of filing of Opposition Brief; and (d) Hearing on September 22, 

2016.

2. On May 17, 2016, the Court ordered the briefing and hearing schedule as proposed by the 

parties.

3. On July 11, 2016, based upon stated reasons, the parties stipulated to the extension of the 

ordered briefing and hearing schedule, which the Court so ordered on July 12, 2016. Based upon the 

Court’s order: (a) Plaintiffs' Opening Memorandum in Support of an Award of Attorneys’ Fees was to 

be filed on or before August 31, 2016; (b) the District’s Opposition Memorandum was to be filed on or 

before September 30, 2016; (c) Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum was to be filed by no later than 14 days 

after the District's Opposition Memorandum is filed; and (d) a hearing on the merits was scheduled for 

November 17, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7 before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr.

4. On August 31, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their opening memorandum and supporting papers. 

5. Due to the unforeseen leave of absence of one of the District’s attorneys primarily 

responsible for this matter, including the preparation of the District’s opposition memorandum and 

supporting papers, and impacts on this case and other pending matters as a result of same, counsel for 

the District requested, and counsel for Plaintiffs agreed, to extend the remaining briefing schedule in this 

case, as follows: (a) District’s Opposition Memorandum (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers 

shall be filed on or before October 14, 2016; and (b) Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum (limited to 15 

pages) and supporting papers shall be filed by no later than November 4, 2016. The parties also agreed

///

Case 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-DB Document 25 Filed 09/30/16 Page 2 of 4
JOINT STIP. RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING Jay T., et al. v. SCUSD 

SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON Case No. 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-DB

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LOZANO SMITH

One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050

that the ordered hearing on the merits in this matter may remain on calendar for November 17, 2016 as 

scheduled. 

6. There has been only one previous modification to the proposed briefing and hearing 

schedule in this matter. 

7. Accordingly, the parties request approval for this agreed-upon modification to the 

briefing schedule.

Dated: September 26, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

RUDERMAN & KNOX, LLP 

/s/ Colleen A. Snyder

RICHARD RUDERMAN

COLLEEN A. SNYDER

Attorney for Plaintiffs Jay T. and Anne M.-T., individually 

and as guardians ad litem for M.M.-T.

Dated: September 26, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

LOZANO SMITH

/s/ Sloan R. Simmons 

SLOAN R. SIMMONS

SARAH L. GARCIA

CAREY H. ASH

Attorneys for Defendant

SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOLDISTRICT

Case 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-DB Document 25 Filed 09/30/16 Page 3 of 4
JOINT STIP. RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING Jay T., et al. v. SCUSD 

SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON Case No. 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-DB

4 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LOZANO SMITH

One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050

 ORDER 

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation between PLAINTIFFS Jay T. and Anne M.-T., 

individually, and as guardian ad litem for M.M.-T. (“Plaintiffs”) and DEFENDANT Sacramento City 

Unified School District (“District”), and good cause appearing, 

The Court hereby orders the briefing schedule in this action to be extended, as follows: 

1. District’s Opposition Memorandum (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers shall be 

filed on or before October 14, 2016; and 

2. Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum (limited to 15 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed 

by no later than November 4, 2016. 

The hearing on the merits in this matter set for November 17, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., shall remain on 

calendar as scheduled. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 29, 2016 

Case 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-DB Document 25 Filed 09/30/16 Page 4 of 4