Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_94-cv-01633/USCOURTS-cand-3_94-cv-01633-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORP.,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

MICREL, INC.,

Defendant(s). /

No. C-94-1633 MHP

ORDER DENYING

FURTHER

APPLICATION FOR

COSTS

Plaintiff has written this court regarding its taxable costs submitted pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

section 1920 and Civil Local Rule 54-1. Defendant has written to oppose this request. This court

issued its judgment on June 9, 2006, wherein it ruled that plaintiff “shall not recover attorneys’ fees

and costs of defendant Micrel, Inc., each party bearing its own costs.” The court need not address

the timeliness of the request or whether the statutory provision or rule plaintiff now asserts in

support of its bill of costs applies. The court already has made it clear that costs will not be allowed

and the court meant what it said. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s above-described request that costs be allowed is

DENIED.

Date: January 12, 2007 

MARILYN HALL PATEL

District Judge

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Case 3:94-cv-01633-MHP Document 401 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ENDNOTES

Case 3:94-cv-01633-MHP Document 401 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 2