Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-03968/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-03968-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

[PROPOSED] RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF 

ATTACHMENT

Case No.: C13-3968 YGR

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)

Shivani Nanda, Esq. (SBN 253891)

SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 882-7900

Facsimile: (415) 882-9287

mstafford@sjlawcorp.com

snanda@sjlawcorp.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUSSELL E. BURNS, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

HALOPOFF & SONS, a California Corporation; 

JOHN HALOPOFF, an individual

 Defendants.

Case No.: C13-3968 YGR

[PROPOSED] RIGHT TO ATTACH 

ORDER AND ORDER FOR 

ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF 

ATTACHMENT

*AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT*

The Court has considered the application of Plaintiffs, Russell E. Burns, et al., for a right to 

attach order and order for issuance of writ of attachment against the property of Defendants,

Halopoff & Sons, a corporation qualified to do business in California, and John Halopoff, a 

natural person who resides in California.

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 4:13-cv-03968-YGR Document 54 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF 

ATTACHMENT

Case No.: C13-3968 YGR

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 485.220, and based on Plaintiffs’

application, memorandum of points and authorities, and accompanying Declarations of Shivani 

Nanda (Dkt. No. 52) and David E. Hayner (Dkt. No. 51), the Court finds:

1. The claim upon which Plaintiffs’ application is based is one upon which an attachment 

may be issued.

2. Plaintiffs have established the probable validity of the claim upon which the 

attachment is based.

3. The attachment is not sought for a purpose other than the recovery on the claim upon 

which the attachment is based.

4. The amount to be secured by the attachment is greater than zero.

For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs application for ex parte right to attach is 

GRANTED. 

Plaintiffs have the right to attach the property of Defendants Halopoff & Sons and John 

Halopoff in the amount of $338,403.64. No later than January 20, 2015, plaintiffs will file a 

proposed form of writ. The temporary protective order issued on January 5, 2015, is extended

until January 20, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: January 14, 2015 _________________________________

Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

United States District Judge

 

Case 4:13-cv-03968-YGR Document 54 Filed 01/14/15 Page 2 of 2