Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05330/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05330-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. 1

Case No. C 09-5330 JF (RS)

ORDER GRANTING RENEWED MOTION FOR TRO

(JFLC2)

**E-Filed 1/6/2010**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GABRIELA R. CARNERO, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL (WAMU), et al.,

 Defendants.

Case Number C 09-5330 JF (RS)

ORDER GRANTING RENEWED 1

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND

SETTING HEARING

Re: Docket No. 27 

On December 30, 2009, this Court denied Plaintiffs’ application for a temporary

restraining order (“TRO”), noting inter alia that Plaintiffs had not stated clearly that a trustee’s

sale of the property was imminent, had not provided the date of any such sale, and had not

explained why their application had not been filed earlier. Today Plaintiffs filed a document

entitled “URGENT - MOTION TO OBJECT TO THE DENIAL OF HON. JEREMY FOGEL’S

ORDER OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER,” which the Court construes as a renewed

Case 5:09-cv-05330-JF Document 29 Filed 01/06/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 09-5330 JF (RS)

ORDER GRANTING RENEWED MOTION FOR TRO

(JFLC2)

application for TRO. Plaintiffs now state that a trustee’s sale has been scheduled for tomorrow,

January 7, 2010; that they received notice of the sale on December 17, 2009; and that they

delayed filing their TRO application for some days because they were under the (mistaken) belief

that they first had to pursue an application for a lis pendens. Plaintiffs attach proof of facsimile

service of their TRO application upon Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation (“Quality”),

the entity that appears to have scheduled the trustee’s sale. The Court has solicited but has not

received opposition from Quality, nor has it received opposition from any other defendant.

Given Plaintiffs’ pro se status, their clarification regarding the imminence of the trustee’s

sale, their explanation as to the timing of their application for TRO, and the lack of opposition,

the Court will issue a TRO effective until 5:00 p.m. on Friday, January 15, 2010, or until further

order of the Court. A hearing will be scheduled for Friday, January 15, 2010 at 9:00 on

Plaintiffs’ application.

ORDER

Good cause therefor appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ application

for a TRO is GRANTED. Defendants shall not proceed with the trustee’s sale until after 5:00

p.m. on Friday, January 15, 2010 or until further order of the Court. 

A hearing is set for Friday, January 15, 2010 at 9:00 on Plaintiffs’ application.

DATED: January 6, 2010

 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:09-cv-05330-JF Document 29 Filed 01/06/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case No. C 09-5330 JF (RS)

ORDER GRANTING RENEWED MOTION FOR TRO

(JFLC2)

This Order has been served upon the following persons:

David C. Scott dscott@mccarthyholthus.com 

Glenn Harlan Wechsler glenn@glennwechsler.com, larry@glennwechsler.com,

linda@glennwechsler.com 

Lawrence Daniel Harris larry@glennwechsler.com 

Matthew Edward Podmenik lrodriguez@mccarthyholthus.com 

Roshni V Patel RPatel@mccarthyholthus.com 

Seth Michael Harris seharris@mccarthyholthus.com, civilefile@mccarthyholthus.com 

Gabriela R. Carnero

Jose R. Carnero

5645 Blossom Avenue

San Jose, CA 95123

Gabriela R. Carnero

Jose R. Carnero

1558 1/2 Minnesota Avenue

San Jose, CA 95125

Case 5:09-cv-05330-JF Document 29 Filed 01/06/10 Page 3 of 3