Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00986/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00986-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re SOLECTRON CORPORATION 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Master File No. C-03-0986-CRB 

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

DATE: March 3, 2006 

TIME: 10:00 a.m. 

COURTROOM: The Honorable 

Charles R. Breyer 

Case 3:03-cv-00986-CRB Document 154 Filed 03/03/06 Page 1 of 6
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

- C-03-0986-CRB - 1 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to an Order of this Court, dated 

November 30, 2005, on the application of the Settling Parties for approval of the settlement set forth 

in the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of November 11, 2005 (the “Stipulation”). Due and 

adequate notice having been given of the settlement as required in said Order, and the Court having 

considered all papers filed and proceedings held herein and otherwise being fully informed in the 

premises and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND 

DECREED that: 

1. This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation, and all 

terms used herein shall have the same meanings set forth in the Stipulation. 

2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Litigation and over all 

parties to the Litigation, including all Members of the Class. 

3. Except as to any individual claim of those Persons (identified in Exhibit 1 attached 

hereto) who have validly and timely requested exclusion from the Class, the Litigation and all claims 

contained therein, including all of the Released Claims, are dismissed with prejudice as to the Lead 

Plaintiffs and the other Members of the Class, and as against each and all of the Released Persons. 

The parties are to bear their own costs, except as otherwise provided in the Stipulation. 

4. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court hereby 

approves the settlement set forth in the Stipulation and finds that said settlement is, in all respects, 

fair, reasonable and adequate to, and is in the best interests of, the Lead Plaintiffs, the Class and each 

of the Class Members. This Court further finds the settlement set forth in the Stipulation is the result 

of arm’s-length negotiations between experienced counsel representing the interests of the Lead 

Plaintiffs, the Class Members and the Defendants. Accordingly, the settlement embodied in the 

Stipulation is hereby approved in all respects and shall be consummated in accordance with its terms 

and provisions. The Settling Parties are hereby directed to perform the terms of the Stipulation. 

5. Upon the Effective Date, the Lead Plaintiffs, the Section 11 Plaintiff and each of the 

Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, 

and forever released, relinquished and discharged all Released Claims against the Released Persons, 

whether or not such Class Member executes and delivers a Proof of Claim and Release form. 

Case 3:03-cv-00986-CRB Document 154 Filed 03/03/06 Page 2 of 6
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

- C-03-0986-CRB - 2 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

6. All Class Members are hereby forever barred and enjoined from prosecuting the 

Released Claims against the Released Persons. 

7. Upon the Effective Date hereof, each of the Released Persons shall be deemed to 

have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished 

and discharged the Lead Plaintiffs, the Section 11 Plaintiff, each and all of the Class Members, and 

Lead Counsel from all claims (including Unknown Claims), arising out of, relating to, or in 

connection with the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement or resolution of the Litigation or 

the Released Claims. 

8. The distribution of the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action 

and the publication of the Summary Notice as provided for in the Order Preliminarily Approving 

Settlement and Providing for Notice constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances, 

including individual notice to all Members of the Class who could be identified through reasonable 

effort. Said Notice provided the best notice practicable under the circumstances of those 

proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, including the proposed settlement set forth in the 

Stipulation, to all Persons entitled to such notice, and said Notice fully satisfied the requirements of 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the requirements of due process, and any other applicable law. 

9. Any plan of allocation submitted by Lead Counsel or any order entered regarding the 

attorneys’ fee and expense application shall in no way disturb or affect this Final Judgment and shall 

be considered separate from this Final Judgment. 

10. Neither the Stipulation nor the settlement contained therein, nor any act performed or 

document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the settlement: (a) is or may be 

deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, 

or of any wrongdoing or liability of the Defendants or their Related Parties; or (b) is or may be 

deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of the 

Defendants or their Related Parties in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, 

administrative agency or other tribunal. Defendants and/or their Related Parties may file the 

Stipulation and/or the Judgment in any other action that may be brought against them in order to 

support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, 

Case 3:03-cv-00986-CRB Document 154 Filed 03/03/06 Page 3 of 6
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

- C-03-0986-CRB - 3 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue 

preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. 

11. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains 

continuing jurisdiction over (a) implementation of this settlement and any award or distribution of 

the Settlement Fund, including interest earned thereon; (b) disposition of the Settlement Fund; 

(c) hearing and determining applications for attorneys’ fees and expenses in the Litigation; and (d) 

all parties hereto for the purpose of construing, enforcing and administering the Stipulation. 

12. The Court finds that during the course of the Litigation, the Settling Parties and their 

respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

11. 

13. In the event that the settlement does not become effective in accordance with the 

terms of the Stipulation or the Effective Date does not occur, or in the event that the Settlement 

Fund, or any portion thereof, is returned to the Defendants, then this Judgment shall be rendered null 

and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation and shall be vacated and, 

in such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null and void 

to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation. 

DATED: _____________________ 

 THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 Submitted by: 

GREEN WELLING LLP 

ROBERT S. GREEN 

235 Pine Street, 15th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415/477-6700 

415/477-6710 (fax) 

Liaison Counsel 

March 03, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:03-cv-00986-CRB Document 154 Filed 03/03/06 Page 4 of 6
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

- C-03-0986-CRB - 4 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

SAMUEL H. RUDMAN 

DAVID A. ROSENFELD 

58 South Service Road, Suite 200 

Melville, NY 11747 

Telephone: 631/367-7100 

631/367-1173 (fax) 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

JOY ANN BULL 

s/ JOY ANN BULL 

JOY ANN BULL 

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: 619/231-1058 

619/231-7423 (fax) 

SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP 

KATHARINE M. RYAN 

KAY E. SICKLES 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

Telephone: 610/667-7706 

610/667-7056 (fax) 

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

SCHATZ & NOBEL, P.C. 

ANDREW M. SCHATZ 

JEFFREY S. NOBEL 

NANCY A. KULESA 

One Corporate Center 

20 Church Street, Suite 1700 

Hartford, CT 06103 

Telephone: 860/493-6292 

860/493-6290 (fax) 

Case 3:03-cv-00986-CRB Document 154 Filed 03/03/06 Page 5 of 6
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

- C-03-0986-CRB - 5 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD 

 & TOLL, P.L.L.C. 

STEVEN J. TOLL 

DANIEL S. SOMMERS 

1100 New York Avenue, N.W. 

West Tower, Suite 500 

Washington, DC 20005-3964 

Telephone: 202/408-4600 

202/408-4699 (fax) 

Executive Committee Members 

S:\Settlement\Solectron.set\JGT 00028386.doc 

Case 3:03-cv-00986-CRB Document 154 Filed 03/03/06 Page 6 of 6