Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01642/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01642-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

10922723 1

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE

White v. Ecolab Inc., Case No. 1:13-cv-1642 GSA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

JOHNEY WHITE, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

ECOLAB INC. and DOES 1-25, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:13-cv-1642 GSA

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR 

DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

DISCOVERY REQUESTS

(Doc. 29)

Based on the parties’ stipulation (Doc. 29), the Court grants Ecolab Inc. an extension of time to 

respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. Specifically, Defendant shall respond and/or object to Plaintiff’s 

Requests for Admissions, Set One; Interrogatories, Set One; and Requests for Production, Set One on or 

before February 11, 2015. The Court notes (and the stipulation acknowledges) that this request is the 

second time the parties have requested an extension of time with respect to these discovery requests. The 

parties are advised that the Court views the filing of multiple piecemeal requests for extensions of time 

with disfavor. In the future, the parties should determine the total amount of time that will actually be 

required as an extension before approaching the Court with a stipulated request for an extension of time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 30, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01642-GSA Document 31 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 1