Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00290/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00290-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Durrell A. Puckett is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 14, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation which was 

served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that objections to the Findings and 

Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. No objections were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

///

///

DURRELL A. PUCKETT,

 Plaintiff,

v.

K. BRANDON,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00290-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

[ECF Nos. 25, 31]

Case 1:14-cv-00290-SAB Document 36 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed on December 14, 2015, is adopted in full; and

2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2016 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00290-SAB Document 36 Filed 02/11/16 Page 2 of 2