Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04856/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04856-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

Andrea S. Carlise (State Bar No. 151648) 

Eric R. De Walt (State Bar No. 138560) 

2 Kristin A. Smith (State Bar No. 242643) 

3 

PATTON•WOLAN•CARLISE, LLP 

,~~~~~, 1999 Harrison Street,~S~u~it~e~1~35~o~~~~ 

Oakland, CA 94612-3582 

Telephone: (51 O) 987-7500 

Facsimile: (510) 987-7575 

Email: acarlise@pwc-law.com; edewalt@pwc-law.com; 

6 ksmith@pwc-law.com 

4 

5 

1 

Defendants. 

7 Attorneys for Defendants 

8 ALAMEDA COUNTY, also sued erroneously herein 

as ALAMEDA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, 

9 LADONNA HARRIS, and ESA EHMEN-KRAUSE 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Plaintiff, 

Complaint Filed: August 7, 2014 

23 WHEREAS, Defendants, ALAMEDA COUNTY, also sued erroneously herein as ALAMEDA 

24 COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT ("County"), LADONNA HARRIS and ESA EHMEN25 KRAUSE, through their attorneys of record, and Plaintiff, LISA HILL ("Plaintiff'), through her 

26 attorney of record, ( collectively "Parties") have met and conferred over the currently scheduled 

27 deadlines; 

28 

LISA HILL, an individual, Case No.: C 14-04856 CRB 

vs. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND 

DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES 

THE ALAMEDA COUNTY PROBATION 

DEPARTMENT, a public agency, ALAMEDA 

COUNTY, LADONNA HARRIS, individually 

and in her representative capacity, and ESA 

EHMEN KRAUSE, individually and in her 

representative capacity and DOES ONE through 

FIFTY, inclusive, 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (Case No C 14-04856 CRB) 

TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE 

MOTION DEADLINES 

Case 3:14-cv-04856-CRB Document 38 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 3
1 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that they need more time to conduct discovery prior to the filing 

2 of dispositive motions in light of defense counsel's recent substitution into this case; 

3 WHEREAS, Defendants' counsel has advised Plaintiffs counsel that it would like to continue 

4 the trial date due to Defendants' counsel's current trial schedule which includes trials scheduled for 

5 June 6, 2015 and July 8, 2015. Plaintiffs counsel in turn, advised Defendants' counsel that he will be 

6 out of state beginning July 1 through August and then changing his employment in September, so he 

7 intends to add co-counsel in this case and thus he cannot agree to a continued trial date until co8 counsel is added as counsel for Plaintiff; 

9 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to continue the currently set discovery and dispositive 

10 motion deadlines now and then agree to continue the current trial date of May 16, 2016 (with court 

11 approval) after co-counsel for Plaintiff has been brought into the case; 

12 WHEREAS, the Parties have also agreed to continue settlement discussions and consider the 

13 possibility of engaging in another mediation session or settlement conference; 

14 Ill 

15 Ill 

16 Ill 

17 Ill 

18 Ill 

19 Ill 

20 Ill 

21 Ill 

22 Ill 

23 Ill 

24 Ill 

25 Ill 

26 Ill 

27 Ill 

28 Ill 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (Case No C 14-04856 CRB) 

TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE 

MOTION DEADLINES 

2 

Case 3:14-cv-04856-CRB Document 38 Filed 11/24/15 Page 2 of 3
11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties that the schedule 

2 for this case be modified as follows: 

3 Non-expert discovery completed by January 22, 2016. 

4 Motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 filed by February 19, 2015. 

5 Hearing on motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 on March 25, 2016. 

6 Expert disclosures by April 1, 2016. 

7 Rebuttal expert disclosures by April 8, 2016. 

8 Completion of expert discovery by April 22, 2016. 

9 Continued trial date (currently set for May 16, 2016) to be determined after Plaintiff's counsel 

1 O associates co-counsel into this case. 

Dated: November 23, 2015 PATTON+ WOLAN + CARLISE, LLP 

By: Isl Andrea S. Carlise 

ANDREA S. CARLISE 

ERIC R. DeWALT 

KRISTIN A. SMITH 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ALAMEDA COUNTY, also sued erroneously herein 

as ALAMEDA COUNTY PROBATION 

DEPARTMENT, LADONNA HARRIS, and ESA 

EHMEN-KRAUSE 

Dated: November 23, 2015 STEPHEN F. HENRY, ESQ. 

By: Isl Stephen Henry 

STEPHEN F. HENRY 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

LISA HILL 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE 

MOTION DEADLINES 

(Case No C 14-04856 CRB) 

November 24, 2015

Case 3:14-cv-04856-CRB Document 38 Filed 11/24/15 Page 3 of 3