Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02747/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02747-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES LLC, et

al.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

F.E.A. MERCHANDISING INC.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C09-2747 MMC (BZ)

SCHEDULING ORDER

Having read docket No. 50 and 51, and Judge Chesney’s

recent order of reference to the ADR Program, IT IS ORDERED as

follows:

1. This Court has no authority to alter any pretrial or

trial dates set by Judge Chesney. Any requests to reopen

discovery or otherwise alter the pretrial schedule should be

directed to Judge Chesney. 

2. To the extent that either side believes the other has

failed to provide discovery that was requested before the

discovery cutoff, as that term is explained in Civil L.R. 26-

2, that party has leave to file an appropriate motion to

Case 3:09-cv-02747-MMC Document 54 Filed 05/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

compel after the parties have had their ADR conference and the

moving party certifies that it is satisfied that the

settlement agreement cannot be finalized.

Dated: May 26, 2010

Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES V. F.E.A.MERCHANDISING\DISC ORD 3.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-02747-MMC Document 54 Filed 05/26/10 Page 2 of 2