Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02248/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02248-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

JACKSON LEWIS LLP 

MIA FARBER (SBN 131467) 

JAMES T. JONES (SBN 167967) 

NATHAN W. AUSTIN (SBN 219672) 

RANDALL J. HAKES (SBN 233548) 

801 K Street, Suite 2300 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 341-0404 

Facsimile: (916) 341-0141 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DESTINATION TAHOE HOTEL, INC., 

(erroneously sued herein as DESTINATION 

HOTELS & RESORTS) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

REBECCA COBAIN, AMANDA SPITSEN and 

AMELIA ESPINOZA, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

DESTINATION HOTELS & RESORTS, and 

DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. CIV.S-05-02248-FCD DAD 

ORDER RE REQUEST FOR PAGE 

LIMIT EXTENSION 

“AS MODIFIED” 

Trial Date: August 14, 2007 

Based on the Request for Page Limit Extension filed by Defendant Destination 

Tahoe Hotel, Inc. (erroneously sued herein as Destination Hotels & Resorts), leave is hereby 

granted to Defendant Destination Tahoe Hotel, Inc. to file a Memorandum of Points and 

Authorities is Support of Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication not to 

exceed 30 pages in length. In light of this extension, any memorandum of points and authorities 

filed in support of a cross motion for summary judgment may also exceed the court’s page limit 

and should not exceed 30 pages in length. Additionally, the court shall allow the parties to 

exceed the page limit on oppositions to 30 pages in length and any replies to 15 pages in length. 

Dated: March 15, 2007 

Case 2:05-cv-02248-FCD-DAD Document 30 Filed 03/15/07 Page 1 of 1