Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00364/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00364-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332fc Diversity - Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES MURPHY AND TEANA

MURPHY,

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 17cv364-LAB (AGS)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

vs.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,

Defendant.

Failure to file an “opposition to any motion will be construed as consent to granting 

the motion.” Standing Order § 4; see CivLR 7.1. Wells Fargo filed a motion to dismiss three

months ago. The Murphy’s never filed an opposition. The Court grants the motion to dismiss

without prejudice. Newman v. Lamont, 2011 WL 5909837 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011).

If the Murphy’s think they can fix the problems identified by Wells Fargo, they may file

a motion for leave to file an amended complaint on or before June 30, 2017. That motion

must also explain why the Court shouldn’t dismiss the action for failure to comply with the

Court’s rules. If the Murphy’s fail to file a motion addressing these issues, the Court will

dismiss the action with prejudice. Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 23, 2017

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00364-LAB-AGS Document 10 Filed 06/26/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 1