Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02619/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02619-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE BARTHOLOMEW,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-2619 GEB KJM P

vs.

KENDRICKS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed February 2, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma

pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement within thirty days and

was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s

order. 

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned,

plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his

current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record

address of the party is fully effective.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

1

Case 2:08-cv-02619-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 04/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 15, 2010. 

1

bart2619.fifp

2

Case 2:08-cv-02619-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 04/16/10 Page 2 of 2