Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-02386/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-02386-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

**E-filed 02/11/2010** 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

INTERSIL CORPORATION, et al.,

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

TECHNOLOGY LICENSING 

CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 09-02386 RS 

ORDER RE STAY MOTIONS 

Plaintiffs seek to stay this entire case pending resolution of the action pending in Santa Clara 

Superior Court between them and defendants. Third party defendant Ross Video joins in that motion 

and further seeks a stay of the claims against it until the claims between plaintiffs and defendants are 

resolved. As discussed at the hearing, granting a formal stay in either instance does not appear to be 

warranted at this juncture, but efficient use of Court and party resources does call for appropriate 

consideration of some of the issues raised in the motions with respect to scheduling how this case is 

to proceed. Accordingly, the motions will be denied without prejudice, and the parties are directed 

to meet and confer to attempt to reach agreements on phasing discovery and/or other proceedings in 

this action, as well as coordinating discovery with that occurring in the state court action. The 

Case 5:09-cv-02386-RS Document 50 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

parties shall present their proposals in conjunction with the upcoming Case Management 

Conference. 

Dated: 02/11/2010 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:09-cv-02386-RS Document 50 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2