Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-02727/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-02727-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

1

13-cv-02727-JM-PCL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARD WATER DISTRICT,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES DAVEY AND ASSOCIATES, 

INC., an Arizona Corporation; JAMES 

DAVEY; and DOES 1 through 50,

Defendants.

JAMES DAVEY AND ASSOCIATES, 

INC., an Arizona corporation, 

Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

GEORGE CAIRO ENGINEERING, 

INC., an Arizona corporation; and ROES 

1 through 10, inclusive,

Third-Party Defendants.

Case No.: 13-cv-02727-JM-PCL

SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING 

ORDER REGULATING DISCOVERY 

AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL 

PROCEEDINGS

On March 21, 2018, the parties filed a joint motion to amend the previously 

amended scheduling order. (Doc. 85.) The parties base their motion on the third party 

complaint filed against George Cairo Engineering (GCE). (Doc. 63.) GCE filed a motion 

Case 3:13-cv-02727-JM-RBB Document 86 Filed 03/22/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 5
2

13-cv-02727-JM-PCL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to dismiss the third party complaint, and after the Court denied its motion, GCE filed a 

counterclaim against James Davey and Associates (JDA). (Doc. 69, 73.) The Court 

dismissed GCE’s counterclaim with leave to amend on March 5, 2018, pursuant to a 

motion to dismiss filed by JDA. (Doc. 83.) Given this third party motion practice, the 

parties are still in the pleading stage of the case and will require additional time to 

complete discovery and prepare for trial. (Doc. 85 at 2.) 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties by May 31, 2018. 

“Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period 

of time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, 

taking into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure. Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer 

with regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). The 

Court expects counsel to make every effort to resolve all disputes without court 

intervention through the meet and confer process. If the parties reach an impasse on any 

discovery issue, counsel shall file an appropriate motion within the time limit and 

procedures outlined in the undersigned magistrate judge’s chambers rules. A failure to 

comply in this regard will result in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent an 

order of the court, no stipulation continuing or altering this requirement will be 

recognized by the court.

2. The parties shall designate their respective experts in writing by June 22, 

2018. The parties must identify any person who may be used at trial to present evidence 

pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Fed. R. Evid. This requirement is not limited to 

retained experts. The date for exchange of rebuttal experts shall be by July 6, 2018. The 

written designations shall include the name, address and telephone number of the expert 

and a reasonable summary of the testimony the expert is expected to provide. The list 

shall also include the normal rates the expert charges for deposition and trial testimony.

Case 3:13-cv-02727-JM-RBB Document 86 Filed 03/22/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 5
3

13-cv-02727-JM-PCL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. By August 7, 2018, each party shall comply with the disclosure provisions 

in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This disclosure 

requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide expert 

testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving of 

expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails to 

make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to use 

evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In 

addition, the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c).

4. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal 

evidence under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D) by August 21, 2018.

5. All expert discovery shall be completed by all parties by September 19, 

2018. The parties shall comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph 

governing fact discovery.

6. Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court 

may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on 

the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence.

7. All other pretrial motions must be filed by October 18, 2018. Counsel for 

the moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who 

will hear the motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion date and 

the hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. 

Failure to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being 

heard. Motions in limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as otherwise set 

by the district judge.

8. A Mandatory Settlement Conference shall be conducted on October 31, 

2018 at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Peter C. Lewis. Counsel or 

any party representing himself or herself shall submit confidential settlement briefs 

directly to chambers by October 24, 2018. All parties are ordered to read and to fully 

comply with the Chamber Rules of the assigned magistrate judge.

Case 3:13-cv-02727-JM-RBB Document 86 Filed 03/22/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 5
4

13-cv-02727-JM-PCL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9. In jury trial cases before Judge Miller, neither party is required to file 

Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law.

10. Counsel shall comply with the pre-trial disclosure requirements of Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 26(a)(3) by November 21, 2018. Failure to comply with these disclosure 

requirements could result in evidence preclusion or other sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P.

37.

11. Counsel shall meet and take the action required by Local Rule 16.1(f)(4) by 

November 1, 2018. At this meeting, counsel shall discuss and attempt to enter into 

stipulations and agreements resulting in simplification of the triable issues. Counsel shall 

exchange copies and/or display all exhibits other than those to be used for impeachment. 

The exhibits shall be prepared in accordance with Local Rule 16.1(f)(4)(c). Counsel shall 

note any objections they have to any other parties’ Pretrial Disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 26(a)(3). Counsel shall cooperate in the preparation of the proposed pretrial 

conference order.

12. Counsel for plaintiff will be responsible for preparing the pretrial order and 

arranging the meetings of counsel pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1(f). By November 

28, 2018, plaintiff’s counsel must provide opposing counsel with the proposed pretrial 

order for review and approval. Opposing counsel must communicate promptly with 

plaintiff’s attorney concerning any objections to form or content of the pretrial order, and 

both parties shall attempt promptly to resolve their differences, if any, concerning the 

order.

13. The Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order, including objections to any 

other parties’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures shall be prepared, served and 

lodged with the assigned district judge by December 11, 2018, and shall be in the form 

prescribed in and comply with Local Rule 16.1(f)(6).

14. The final Pretrial Conference is scheduled on the calendar of the Honorable 

Jeffrey T. Miller on December 19, 2018 at 8:30 a.m.. A trial will be held before the 

Honorable Jeffrey T. Miller, United States District Court Judge, on January 22, 2019 at 

Case 3:13-cv-02727-JM-RBB Document 86 Filed 03/22/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 4 of 5
5

13-cv-02727-JM-PCL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10:00 am.

15. The parties must review the chambers’ rules for the assigned district judge 

and magistrate judge.

16. A post trial settlement conference before a magistrate judge may be held 

within 30 days of verdict in the case.

17. The dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good 

cause shown.

18. Briefs or memoranda in support of or in opposition to any pending motion 

shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length without leave of a district court judge. 

No reply memorandum shall exceed ten (10) pages without leave of a district court judge. 

Briefs and memoranda exceeding ten (10) pages in length shall have a table of contents 

and a table of authorities cited.

19. Plaintiff’s counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all parties that enter 

this case hereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2018

Case 3:13-cv-02727-JM-RBB Document 86 Filed 03/22/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 5 of 5