Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02341/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02341-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 12:22 Securities Fraud

---

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN F RA NCISC O 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RENOTICING MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

Paul H. Dawes (Bar No. 55191) 

John C. Tang (Bar No. 212371) 

Andrew M. Farthing (Bar No. 237565) 

140 Scott Drive 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: 650.328.4600 

Facsimile: 650.463.2600 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

David M. Friedman (Bar No. 209214) 

Samuel B. Lutz (Bar No. 241165) 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: 415.391.0600 

Facsimile: 415.395.8095 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Waste 

Connections, Inc., Defendants Mittelstaedt, Davis, 

Dupreau, Bouck, Chambliss, Eddie, Foos, Hall, 

Hansen, Hunt, Little, Moser, Rose and SpeciallyAppearing Defendants Harlan and Razzouk 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

KENNETH TRAVIS, et al., 

Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

RONALD J. MITTELSTAEDT, et al., 

Defendant(s), 

and 

WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC., 

Nominal Defendant. 

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-02341-LEW-GGH 

“CONSOLIDATED ACTION” 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RENOTICING MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

LAWRENCE PIERCE, et al., 

Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

RONALD J. MITTELSTAEDT, et al., 

Defendant(s), 

and 

WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC., 

Nominal Defendant. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 69 Filed 12/10/07 Page 1 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN F RA NCISC O 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RENOTICING MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2007, Nominal Defendant Waste Connections (“Waste 

Connections”) moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ consolidated complaint for failure to make a pre-suit 

demand pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.1; 

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2007, Individual Defendants moved to dismiss 

plaintiffs’ consolidated complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); 

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2007, Specially-Appearing Defendants Messrs. Harlan 

and Razzouk also moved to dismiss certain claims for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) (collectively, with the other two motions to dismiss referenced above, 

the “Motions to Dismiss”); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a consolidated opposition brief in response to Waste 

Connections’ motion to dismiss and the Individual Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and filed a 

separate opposition brief in response to Specially-Appearing Defendants Messrs. Harlan and 

Razzouk’s motion to dismiss; and 

WHEREAS, Defendants filed their reply briefs in support of their Motions to 

Dismiss on October 19, 2007. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties 

that: 

1. The Motions to Dismiss will now be heard by the Honorable Ronald S.W. 

Lew, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 501 I Street, Sacramento, 

California, on February 1, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 69 Filed 12/10/07 Page 2 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN F RA NCISC O 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RENOTICING MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: December 7, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

Paul H. Dawes 

John C. Tang 

David M. Friedman 

Andrew M. Farthing 

By: /S/ Andrew Farthing 

Andrew M. Farthing 

 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

Waste Connections, Inc., Individual 

Defendants Mittelstaedt, Davis, 

Dupreau, Bouck, Chambliss, Eddie, 

Foos, Hall, Hansen, Hunt, Little, 

Moser, Rose and Specially-Appearing 

Defendants Harlan and Razzouk 

Dated: December 7, 2007 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN 

& ROBBINS LLP 

Darren J. Robbins 

Travis E. Downs III 

James I. Jaconette 

 

By: /S/ James Jaconette 

James I. Jaconette 

By Andrew M. Farthing with permission 

SCHIFFRIN BARROWAY TOPAZ 

& KESSLER LLP 

Alan R. Plutzik 

Timothy Fisher 

Nichole T. Browning 

Eric L. Zagar 

J. Daniel Albert 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 69 Filed 12/10/07 Page 3 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN F RA NCISC O 4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RENOTICING MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. 

Dated: December 7, 2007 

/s/ Ronald S. W. Lew_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 69 Filed 12/10/07 Page 4 of 4