Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01610/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01610-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jeffrey L. Fazio (146043) (jlf@fazmiclaw.com) 

Dina E. Micheletti (184141) (dem@fazmiclaw.com) 

FAZIO | MICHELETTI LLP

2410 Camino Ramon, Suite 315 

San Ramon, CA 94583 

T: 925-543-2555 

F: 925-369-0344 

Steven A. Schwartz (pro hac vice) (SAS@chimicles.com) 

Timothy N. Mathews (pro hac vice) (TNM@chimicles.com) 

CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP

361 W. Lancaster Avenue 

Haverford, PA 19041 

T: 610-642-8500 

F: 610-649-3633 

Co-Lead Class Counsel 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE APPLE IPHONE/IPOD WARRANTY 

LITIGATION

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS 

No. CV 10-01610-RS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE

Case 3:10-cv-01610-RS Document 119 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 4
-1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

NOS. CV-10-01610-RS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RECITALS

1. In its Order Granting Conditional Certification of a Settlement Class, Approval of 

Forms and Methods of Notice, and Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement and Release, 

dated June 20, 2013 (Dock. No. 88) (the “Preliminary Approval Order”), the Court set a deadline 

of January 8, 2014 for: (a) the parties to file their responses to any valid and timely objections to 

the settlement, and (b) for plaintiffs to file their response to Apple’s opposition to their motion 

for attorneys’ fees. 

2. On December 4, 2013, an objection to the settlement was filed by Jeffrey Scott 

Kessinger. Dock. No. 111. On or about December 18, 2013, plaintiffs issued a subpoena for Mr. 

Kessinger’s deposition and production of documents. On Sunday, December 29, 2013, Mr. 

Kessinger, through his counsel, filed a motion to quash the subpoena, setting the motion for 

hearing on Thursday, January 2, 2014. Dock. No. 114. On Monday, December 30, 2013, this 

Court referred the matter to a randomly-selected magistrate judge. Dock. No. 115. The Court 

also extended plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to Mr. Kessinger’s objection from January 8 to 

January 24, 2014; however, the Court did not extend defendant Apple’s deadline to respond to 

Mr. Kessinger’s objection. Id.

3. On the same day, the clerk assigned the discovery matter to Magistrate Judge 

Donna M. Ryu, who issued an order vacating the hearing date set by Mr. Kessinger for his 

motion to quash, denying the motion to quash without prejudice, and directing the parties to file 

a letter brief regarding the discovery dispute by no later than January 6, 2014. Dock. No. 116.

4. Additionally, objections were filed by other objectors on November 22 and 

December 11, 2013. Dock. Nos. 109, 112. As a result, the parties have necessarily directed time 

and resources over the past month to objector-related issues, including but not limited to 

gathering information related to these objectors, subpoenaing these objectors, and meeting and 

conferring with these objectors. 

5. The parties agree that circumstances warrant this modification of the remaining 

briefing schedule, as set forth below.

Case 3:10-cv-01610-RS Document 119 Filed 01/02/14 Page 2 of 4
-2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

NOS. CV-10-01610-RS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

Accordingly, by and through their counsel, the parties hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The deadline for Class Counsel and Apple to file papers in response to any valid 

and timely objections is extended from January 8, 2014 to January 24, 2014 (the same date as the 

current deadline for plaintiffs’ response to the objection of Mr. Kessinger).

2. The deadline for Class Counsel to file their response to Apple’s opposition to 

their motion for attorneys’ fees is extended by one week from January 8, 2013 to January 15, 

2014.

3. The hearing date of January 29, 2014 for Plaintiffs’ motions for final approval of 

class action settlement and for award of attorney’s fees, costs and incentive awards shall remain 

unchanged.

DATED: December 31, 2013 Jeffrey L. Fazio 

 Dina E. Micheletti 

FAZIO | MICHELETTI LLP

 by /s/ Jeffrey L. Fazio 

Jeffrey L. Fazio 

 Co-Lead Class Counsel 

DATED: December 31, 2013 Steven A. Schwartz 

 Timothy N. Mathews 

CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP

 by /s/ Steven A. Schwartz 

Steven A. Schwartz 

 Co-Lead Class Counsel 

DATED: December 31, 2013 Penelope A. Preovolos 

 George C. Harris 

MORRISON | FOERSTER LLP

 by /s/ Penelope A. Preovolos 

Penelope A. Preovolos 

 Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc. 

Case 3:10-cv-01610-RS Document 119 Filed 01/02/14 Page 3 of 4
-3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

NOS. CV-10-01610-RS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION OF FILER 

I, Kimberly A. Kralowec, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has 

been obtained from each of the other signatories. See N.D. Cal. Gen. Order No. 45, para. X(B). 

Dated: December 31, 2013 By: /s/ Kimberly A. Kralowec 

Kimberly A. Kralowec 

THE KRALOWEC LAW GROUP 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. 

Dated: , 2014 

 The Honorable Richard Seeborg 

 United States District Judge 

1/2

Case 3:10-cv-01610-RS Document 119 Filed 01/02/14 Page 4 of 4