Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-02306/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-02306-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Javon Tamar Williams, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

State of Arizona, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV 13-2306-PHX-RCB (MHB) 

 O R D E R 

On November 12, 2013, Plaintiff Javon Tamar Williams, who was confined in the 

Maricopa County Fourth Avenue Jail, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint and an 

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In an Order dated January 13, 2014, the 

Court dismissed the Complaint without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute, and the Clerk of Court entered 

Judgment that same day. On January 17, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Re-open Case, 

which he amended on January 21, 2014. Following that, Plaintiff filed nineteen other 

Motions, many of which were incomprehensible, and ten “Notices.” In an Order dated 

February 24, 2014, the Court denied the Motion to Re-open and all other motions, to the 

extent any relief was requested in them. 

On February 25, 2014, Plaintiff filed in this closed case an unsigned “Notice to 

ORDER physician to Scientific Progress NOTE,” which the Clerk of Court docketed as a 

Motion to Appoint Expert (Doc. 57). Plaintiff has also filed eighteen other “Notices” 

Case 2:13-cv-02306-RCB--MHB Document 72 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(Doc. 52-56, Doc. 58-71). This case is closed and, therefore, the Court will deny the 

Motion to Appoint Expert, to the extent any relief is requested therein. 

 Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Expert (Doc. 57) is denied. 

 DATED this 28th day of March, 2014. 

Case 2:13-cv-02306-RCB--MHB Document 72 Filed 03/28/14 Page 2 of 2