Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06408/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06408-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHRYN HOGAN, CHARLOTTE )

MARIE HOGAN, and THOMAS )

SLADE HOGAN, )

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S )

DEPUTY MICHAEL ROBINSON, )

PATRICIA TOWNE, UNKNOWN LAW )

ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, DOES )

1-20, and THE COUNTY OF FRESNO, )

CALIFORNIA )

)

)

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CIV- F-03-6408 AWI LJO

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER ON

COUNTY DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER

On January 27, 2005, the Court granted County Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’

state law claims without prejudice. It has come to the Court’s attention that a time limit for the

Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint was inadvertently omitted. Plaintiffs have yet to file an

amended complaint. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court’s Order on County Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss that was signed on

January 27, 2005, is supplemented to grant Plaintiffs two weeks from the date of

service of this supplemental order in which to file an amended complaint that

sufficiently alleges compliance with the California Tort Claims Act; and

2. The hearing date of May 23, 2005, on County Defendants’ Motion For

Clarification Of Order On County Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss is VACATED

in light of this supplemental order; and

Case 1:03-cv-06408-LJO-GSA Document 70 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

3. County Defendants’ Motion For Clarification Of Order On County Defendants’

Motion To Dismiss is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06408-LJO-GSA Document 70 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 2