Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-02002/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-02002-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (1:14-cv-02002-LJO-EPG (PC))

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672

Attorney General of California

MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

JUSTIN W. WALKER, State Bar No. 276757

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 322-2192

Facsimile: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants

Clark, Graves, and Smith-Robicheaux

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELVIN H. THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARLENE SMITH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:14-cv-02002-LJO-EPG (PC)

STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)); ORDER

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 1:14-cv-02002-LJO-EPG Document 33 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (1:14-cv-02002-LJO-EPG (PC))

Plaintiff Melvin H. Thomas and Defendants N. Clark, A. Graves, and M. SmithRobicheaux have resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal 

of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. 

It is so stipulated.

Dated:

Melvin Thomas

Plaintiff 

Dated:

Justin W. Walker

Deputy Attorney General

California Attorney General's Office

Attorney for Defendants Clark, Graves, and 

Smith-Robicheaux

ORDER

Based on the parties’ stipulation (a fully executed version of which is located at ECF No. 

32), this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Defendants’ 

pending motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 30, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-02002-LJO-EPG Document 33 Filed 09/30/16 Page 2 of 2