Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01797/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01797-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMBROSIO VILLAGRANA, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

ADAMS, Warden, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-01797-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 8)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On December 6, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to

state a claim upon which habeas relief could be granted. (Doc. 8). This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. On January 2, 2008, Petitioner

filed his objections. (Doc. 9). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

Case 1:06-cv-01797-OWW -JLT Document 10 Filed 03/03/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner’s

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is

supported by the record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed December 6, 2007 (Doc. 8), is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 29, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01797-OWW -JLT Document 10 Filed 03/03/08 Page 2 of 2