Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01937/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01937-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1937

DR. GREG BATTERSBY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DR. JOSEPH CAREW, in his individual and official capacities; 

DR. RICHARD HEAVNER, in his individual and official 

capacities; DR. BRIAN HUGHES, in his individual and official 

capacities; DR. JEANNE MCDANIEL-GREEN, in her individual and 

official capacities; DR. JOHN MCGINNIS, in his individual 

and official capacities; DR. DAVID MRUZ, in his individual 

and official capacities; DR. RALPH ROLES, in his individual 

and official capacities; DR. HARVEY GARCIA, in his 

individual and official capacities; E. J. MERCER, in his 

individual and official capacities; JOHN DOES 1-10,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (8:14-cv-00761-HMH)

Submitted: February 24, 2015 Decided: May 5, 2015

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Fein, BRUCE FEIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., Washington, D.C.; 

Donald L. Smith, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellant. 

Eugene H. Matthews, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, P.A., 

Appeal: 14-1937 Doc: 33 Filed: 05/05/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1937 Doc: 33 Filed: 05/05/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Dr. Greg Battersby appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint by 

granting summary judgment for Defendants. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Battersby v. Carew, 

No. 8:14-cv-00761-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2014). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-1937 Doc: 33 Filed: 05/05/2015 Pg: 3 of 3