Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-00299/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-00299-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. 1

Case No. 09-299-JF (PVT)

ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

(JFEX1)

**E-Filed 8/24/10**

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

INTEL CORPORATION, A DELAWARE

CORPORATION,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY

INSURANCE COMPANY, A NEW YORK

CORPORATION

 Defendant.

Case No. 09-299-JF (PVT)

ORDER REQUESTING 1

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

MARKEL AMERICAN INSURANCE

COMPANY, a Virginia Corporation,

 Counterclaimant,

 v.

INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation,

and AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND

LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a New

York Corporation,

 Counterclaim Defendants.

After considering the letter briefing submitted by the parties on August 16, 2010, the

Case 5:09-cv-00299-JF Document 237 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. 09-299-JF (PVT)

ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

(JFEX1)

Court hereby requests that the parties submit supplemental briefing on (1) the preclusive effect of

American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company v. Intel Corporation, et al., Civil Action

No. 09C-01-170-JOH (Del. Super. Ct. July 29, 2010), and (2) the effect of AGLI’s and Markel’s

failure to argue in this Court that “Condition H” of the AGLI policy controls the triggering of

payments only for indemnity rather than defense costs. For purposes of this supplemental

briefing, AGLI and Markel shall be considered the “moving parties,” and each shall individually

submit an “opening” brief that addresses both issues. The “opening” briefs generally should be

consistent with the requirements of Civ. L.R. 7-2, except that they need not notice a date and

time for a hearing, and shall be filed on or before September 3, 2010. Intel’s responsive briefs,

which shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages in length, shall be filed on or before September 10,

2010. AGLI and Markel each may file a reply to the relevant responsive brief, and such replies

generally must be consistent with the requirements of Civ. L.R. 7-3(c) and shall be filed on or

before September 17, 2010. After September 17, 2010, the Court will determine whether to hold

oral argument.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 8/24/2010 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:09-cv-00299-JF Document 237 Filed 08/24/10 Page 2 of 2