Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01440/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01440-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARMANDO VALLE, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

)

___________________________________ )

CV F 05-1440 REC WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS [Doc.

4], DISMISSING ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT FOR

RESPONDENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with what he terms an “Application for

Withholding of Removal.” In his application, Petitioner seeks the withholding of his

removal from this country pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1231(b)(3). 

On January 25, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations

herein. These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice

to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within

thirty days. No objections were filed and on January 31, 2006, Petitioner filed a response

concurring with the findings and recommendations.

Case 1:05-cv-01440-REC-WMW Document 6 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708

F.2d 452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the th

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

January 25, 2006, are a adopted in full;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without prejudice;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01440-REC-WMW Document 6 Filed 03/13/06 Page 2 of 2