Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01877/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01877-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:504 Copyright Infringement

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On January 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the entire action. (Doc. 

5) The notice relies upon Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which “the plaintiff 

may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing 

party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal 

signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been 

filed, an order of the Court is not required for the dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City 

of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 

///

///

///

ALEXANDER L. WILD d/b/a ALEX WILD 

PHOTOGORAPHY,

 Plaintiff,

v.

PEARCE PEST CONTROL, INC.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01877 --- JLT 

ORDER CLOSING CASE

(Doc. 5)

Case 1:15-cv-01877-JLT Document 6 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Here, no other party has appeared in this action. Thus, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to 

close this action in light of the notice of dismissal without prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant 

to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 19, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01877-JLT Document 6 Filed 01/19/16 Page 2 of 2