Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04934/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04934-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING ADR DEADLINES—CV 14-4934-MEJ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FARIBA Z. MADISON, individually and on 

behalf of all “aggrieved employees” under the 

California Labor Code Private Attorneys General 

Act

Plaintiff,

v.

U.S. BANCORP; U.S. BANCORP 

INVESTMENTS, INC.; U.S. BANCORP 

INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC; and DOES 1 

through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CV 14-4934-MEJ

[PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING ADR 

DEADLINES

Crtrm.: 5 - 17th Floor

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

Action Filed: September 23, 2014

Removed: November 6, 2014

Case 3:14-cv-04934-EMC Document 33 Filed 01/20/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING ADR DEADLINES—CV 14-4934-MEJ

Having considered the Joint Stipulation to Reset ADR Deadlines by Plaintiff Fariba Z. 

Madison (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants U.S. Bancorp (“USB”), U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. 

(“USBI”), and U.S. Bancorp Insurance Services, LLC’s (“USBIS”) (collectively, “Defendants”), 

and all other relevant documents on file in this action, the Court finds as follows:

The Court orders that good cause exists for the ADR Deadlines be reset to a date after the 

Court resolves the pending motion to remand and motion to compel arbitration, the outcome of which 

may substantially affect the viability of proceedings in this Court. The Court further orders that the 

new deadline for the Parties (i) to file ADR Certifications (see ADR L.R. 3-5(b)) and (ii) to file either 

a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (see ADR L.R. 3-5(b) & 

(c)) shall be February 26, 2015.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________ _____________________________

The Honorable Edward M. Chen

United States District Judge

1/20/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-04934-EMC Document 33 Filed 01/20/15 Page 2 of 2