Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00576/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00576-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ANDREW D. HEROLD, ESQ., Bar No. 178640

aherold@heroldsagerlaw.com

KENDALL DULICH, ESQ., Bar No 178307

kdulich@heroldsagerlaw.com

HEROLD & SAGER

550 Second Street, Suite 200

Encinitas, CA 92024

(760) 487-1047 / (760) 487-1064 FAX

Attorneys for Defendants

CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY fka AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL 

SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut

corporation, 

Plaintiff,

v.

OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; et 

al; and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-00576-LJO-BAM

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE 

PLEADING

(Doc. 26) 

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff TRAVELERS PROPERTY 

CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA (“Travelers”) and Defendant CHARTIS SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY fka AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES 

INSURANCE COMPANY (“Chartis Specialty”) by and through their respective attorneys’ of 

record.

RECITALS

1. WHEREAS Travelers filed its complaint in the instant action on April 19, 2013;

2. WHEREAS Travelers served Chartis Specialty on May 9, 2013 with the summons 

Case 1:13-cv-00576-LJO-BAM Document 30 Filed 06/04/13 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and complaint in this action;

3. WHEREAS Travelers and Chartis Specialty have agreed to an extension for Chartis

Specialty to respond to the complaint;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED:

4. Subject to the Court’s approval, Chartis Specialty shall file a responsive pleading to 

the complaint on or before June 13, 2013.

5. This stipulation shall not constitute an appearance by Chartis Specialty. Chartis 

Specialty does not waive its right to challenge the Court’s jurisdiction over this matter and/or 

whether Chartis Specialty was validly served with summons and complaint.

DATED: May 31, 2013 HEROLD & SAGER

/s/ Andrew Herold

______________________________________

ANDREW D. HEROLD, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendants

Chartis Specialty Insurance Company and National 

Union Fire Insurance Company

DATED: May 31, 2013 THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC 

/s/ Angela Martin (as authorized 5-31-13)

______________________________________

A. ERIC AGUILERA

KARI M. MYRON

ANGELA MARTIN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

TRAVELERS PROPERTY

CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

Case 1:13-cv-00576-LJO-BAM Document 30 Filed 06/04/13 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

On May 31, 2013, Plaintiff and Defendant Chartis Specialty stipulated to extend 

Defendants’ time to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Doc. 26). The 

Stipulation of the parties is APPROVED. Defendant Chartis Specialty shall have up to an 

including June 13, 2013 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 4, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00576-LJO-BAM Document 30 Filed 06/04/13 Page 3 of 3