Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01893/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01893-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1893

KAMAR ADARDOUR,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN SETTLEMENTS INCORPORATED, trading as Metro 

Settlements Incorporated,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

CITI FINANCIAL SERVICES INCORPORATED, trading as Washington 

Mutual Finance Incorporated,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, 

District Judge. (1:08-cv-00798-AJT-TRJ)

Submitted: May 17, 2010 Decided: June 8, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl L. Crews, C. LOWELL CREWS, ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC, 

Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Craig L. Sarner, BONNER 

KIERNAN TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Appeal: 09-1893 Doc: 29 Filed: 06/08/2010 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-1893 Doc: 29 Filed: 06/08/2010 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Kamar Adardour appeals the district court’s orders 

granting American Settlements Incorporated’s summary judgment 

motion on Adardour’s claim under the Virginia Consumer 

Protection Act, Va. Code Ann. §§ 59.1-196 to 59.1-207 (2006 & 

Supp. 2009), and her claim for tortious interference with 

contractual relationship.*

AFFIRMED

 We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment. See Adardour v. American Settlements Inc., 

No. 1:08-cv-00798-AJT-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed June 23, 2009, entered 

June 24, 2009; July 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

 * The district court had diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2006), and we exercise jurisdiction over the 

district court’s final judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006).

Appeal: 09-1893 Doc: 29 Filed: 06/08/2010 Pg: 3 of 3