Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01263/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01263-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

00568828.WPD JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Nancy J. Sheehan, SBN 109419

Brook A. Dohmen, SBN 242815

350 University Ave., Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481 

FAX: 916.927.3706 

Attorneys for Defendants SACRAMENTO AREA FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY, CITY OF

SACRAMENTO, STEIN BUER and JULIE LEINERT 

Lawrence J. Murray, SBN 77536

MURRAY & ASSOCIATES

1781 Union Street

San Francisco, CA 94123

TEL: 415-673-0555

FAX: 415-928-4084

Attorney for Plaintiff MAGGIE FRANKLIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAGGIE FRANKLIN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO AREA FLOOD CONTROL

AGENCY, a public entity, CITY OF

SACRAMENTO, a public agency, STEIN

BUER and JULIE LEINERT, 

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 2:07-CV-01263-WBS-GGH

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING

ORDER AND EXTEND DEADLINES FOR

EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES,

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF

REBUTTAL EXPERT WITNESSES, AND

DISCOVERY COMPLETION

Plaintiff MAGGIE FRANKLIN and Defendants SACRAMENTO AREA FLOOD CONTROL

AGENCY, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, STEIN BUER and JULIE LEINERT, by and through their

respective attorneys of record, hereby agree to the proposed changes set forth below and request the

Court to modify the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order issued August 31, 2007 as follows:

Case 2:07-cv-01263-WBS-KJN Document 15 Filed 03/21/08 Page 1 of 3
2

00568828.WPD JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Expert Witness Disclosure May 30, 2008

Supplemental Rebuttal Disclosure of Experts June 30, 2008

Discovery Completion Deadline July 30, 2008

Good cause exists to modify the Scheduling Order because the parties still need to complete

necessary discovery for the parties’ experts to review prior to drafting their reports for disclosure

pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(a)(2). All parties have agreed to complete the necessary discovery as soon

as reasonably possible, and therefore respectfully request modification of the Scheduling Order as

identified above.

Dated: March 20, 2008 PORTER SCOTT

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

By /s/ Brooke A. Dohmen 

Nancy J. Sheehan

Brooke A. Dohmen

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: March 20, 2008 MURRAY & ASSOCIATES

By /s/ Lawrence D. Murray (as authorized on 3/18/08)

Lawrence D. Murray

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:07-cv-01263-WBS-KJN Document 15 Filed 03/21/08 Page 2 of 3
3

00568828.WPD JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

ORDER

Based on the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Pre-Trial Schedule is modified as set forth below:

Expert Witness Disclosure May 30, 2008

Supplemental Rebuttal Disclosure of Experts June 30, 2008

Discovery Completion Deadline July 30, 2008

In all other respects, the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order issued August 31, 2007 shall remain in full

force and effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 20, 2008

Case 2:07-cv-01263-WBS-KJN Document 15 Filed 03/21/08 Page 3 of 3