Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00795/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00795-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

790288.1 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

DANIEL J. COYLE (Bar No. 119274) 

CASSANDRA M. FERRANNINI (Bar No. 204277) 

KAREN D. BETTENCOURT (Bar No. 232933) 

555 Capitol Mall, Tenth Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814-4686 

Telephone: (916) 444-1000 

Facsimile: (916) 444-2100 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THOMAS WATSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JEFF EVANSON; LES OESTERREICH; 

and KAREN O’BRINE, trustees of the 

Transhumance Employee Stock Ownership 

Plan, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

WILLIAM J. PRICE; MARY ELLEN 

BREEN, in her capacity as the personal 

representative of the estate and as the 

beneficiary of DENNIS J. BREEN, 

deceased; THOMAS WATSON, and 

DOES 1-20, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:06-cv-00795-GEB-KJM 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS WILLIAM J. PRICE, 

MARY ELLEN BREEN, AND THOMAS 

WATSON’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules 83-143 and 78-230(g), Plaintiffs 

Jeff Evanson, Les Oesterreich, and Karen O’Brine (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants William J. Price, 

Mary Ellen Breen, and Thomas Watson (“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, 

hereby stipulate to continue the hearing on Defendants’motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ second 

amended complaint (the“Motions”). 

The Motions are currently scheduled for hearing on August 21, 2006. However, because 

Plaintiffs’ counsel is unavailable on that date, the parties agree to continue the hearing on the 

Motions to September 5, 2006. The briefing schedule will not be modified: any opposition papers 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00795-GEB -KJM Document 27 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

790288.1 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

to be filed by Plaintiffs will continue to be due on or before August 7, 2006 (and to be 

electronically served on or before August 4, 2006), and any reply papers to be filed by 

Defendants will continue to be due on or before August 14, 2006. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

DATED: July 18, 2006 THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

By: /s/ Charles M. Dyke 

CHARLES M. DYKE 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

JEFF EVANSON; LES OESTERREICH; 

and KAREN O’BRINE 

DATED: July 18, 2006 VELIKANJE MOORE & SHORE, PS 

By: /s/ James C. Carmody 

JAMES C. CARMODY 

Attorneys for Defendant 

WILLIAM J. PRICE 

DATED: July 18, 2006 PILLSBURY, WINTHROP, SHAW, PITTMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Michael J. Daponde 

MICHAEL J. DAPONDE 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MARY ELLEN BREEN, in her capacity as the 

personal representative of the estate and as the 

beneficiary of DENNIS J. BREEN 

DATED: July 18, 2006 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

By: /s/ Cassandra M. Ferrannini 

CASSANDRA M. FERRANNINI 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THOMAS WATSON 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

DATED: July 24, 2006 

 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. 

 United States District Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00795-GEB -KJM Document 27 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 2