Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01960/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01960-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1960

RI’CHA RI SANCHO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ANDERSON SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUR,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (8:15-cv-01353-HMH)

Submitted: January 30, 2017 Decided: February 16, 2017

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ri’Cha ri Sancho, Appellant Pro Se. Allison Aiken Hanna, Mary 

Allison Caudell, CHILDS & HALLIGAN, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1960 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/16/2017 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Ri’Cha ri Sancho appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

granting summary judgment to Anderson School District Four on 

her claims of a hostile work environment, disparate treatment, 

and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights 

Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e–17 (2012). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court.* Sancho v. Anderson Sch. Dist. Four, No. 8:15-cv-01353-

HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * To the extent that Sancho requests a payment plan for her 

mediation fee, Sancho should direct her request to the district 

court in the first instance.

Appeal: 16-1960 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/16/2017 Pg: 2 of 2