Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02518/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02518-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-2518 FCD DAD P

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On June 19, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed on May 30, 2006, disregarding plaintiff’s May 17, 2006 motion to compel the

production of documents and May 24, 2006 motion for leave to depose witnesses and ordering

said documents be placed in the court file. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate

judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the

entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed May 30, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: February 28, 2007.

Case 2:03-cv-02518-DAD Document 91 Filed 03/01/07 Page 1 of 1