Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02471/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02471-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RENNE SLOAN 

HOLTZMAN SAKAI LLP

Attorneys at Law

-1- STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDMENT; Case No. 2:14-CV-02471-MCE

TIMOTHY G. YEUNG (SBN 186170) 

tyeung@publiclawgroup.com

STEVE CIKES (SBN 235413)

scikes@publiclawgroup.com

RENNE SLOAN HOLTZMAN SAKAI LLP

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 600

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 258-8800

Facsimile: (916) 258-8801

Attorneys for Defendants

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

COUNTY OF SHASTA (erroneously sued herein as

SHASTA COUNTY MARSHAL’S OFFICE), and JOEL DEAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAIME SCHMIDT, DEBRA KNOWLES, 

ELIZABETH SAMPSON, AND RYAN 

HENRIOULLE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SHASTA COUNTY MARSHAL’S OFFICE 

AND JOEL DEAN,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:14-CV-02471-MCE

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE 

HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDDGMENT

Pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 230(f), Defendants Superior Court of California, County 

of Shasta1 and Joel Dean (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiffs Jaime Schmidt, Debra Knowles, 

Elizabeth Sampson and Ryan Henrioulle (“Plaintiffs”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows.

WHEREAS, on August 25, 2016, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment or, in the 

alternative partial summary judgment and scheduled a hearing on that motion for October 20, 2016. 

(ECF No. 25.)

WHEREAS, on September 30, 2016, Plaintiffs filed an ex parte application requesting an 

extension of time to file their opposition to Defendants’ summary judgment motion as well as a 

continuance of the October 20, 2016 hearing scheduled on that motion. (ECF No. 32.)

 1 Erroneously sued herein as Shasta County Marshal’s Office.

Case 2:14-cv-02471-MCE-DMC Document 42 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RENNE SLOAN 

HOLTZMAN SAKAI LLP

Attorneys at Law

-2- STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDMENT; Case No. 2:14-CV-02471-MCE

WHEREAS, on October 7, 2016, the Court entered an order granting Plaintiffs’ ex parte 

application and rescheduled the hearing on Defendants’ summary judgment motion for November 17, 

2016. (ECF No. 39.)

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants are not available on the newly-rescheduled November 17, 

2016 hearing date due to prior commitments. They are, however, available on the Court’s next available 

hearing date – i.e., December 1, 2016. Counsel for Plaintiffs are likewise available on December 1, 

2016.

NOW THEREFORE, based on the foregoing, the parties respectfully request that the Court 

continue the November 17, 2016 hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 25) to 

December 1, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: October 19, 2016 RENNE SLOAN HOLTZMAN SAKAI LLP

By: /s/

Steve Cikes

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: October 19, 2016 CLAYEO C. ARNOLD, A PROFESSIONAL LAW 

CORPORATION

By: /s/

Joshua H. Watson

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence for the filing of this document for any signatures 

indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

Dated: October 14, 2016 /s/

Steve Cikes

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 19, 2016

Case 2:14-cv-02471-MCE-DMC Document 42 Filed 10/21/16 Page 2 of 2