Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01834/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01834-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SHANNON,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; DR. 

MICHAEL FOX; DR. RICHARD 

BAUER; and DOES 1 through 20, 

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-1834-TLN-CKD

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME

Good cause shown, Plaintiff Michael Shannon’s motion for an extension of time to find a 

new attorney (ECF No. 53) is GRANTED.1 The times to file an amended complaint and 

responsive pleadings, stated in the Court’s previous Order (ECF No. 52), are VACATED. 

Plaintiff may file and serve an amended complaint within 60 days of entry of the instant 

Order. Defendants may file a responsive pleading within 30 days of service of the amended 

complaint. 

If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within 60 days, this matter will proceed on 

 

1

Plaintiff states his attorney has a substance abuse problem and has dropped the case, subsequent to the filing of the 

Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is currently proceeding pro se.

Case 2:13-cv-01834-TLN-CKD Document 54 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the sole claim that was not dismissed by the Court’s previous Order (ECF No. 52): deliberate 

indifference to Plaintiff’s medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 

1983, against Defendants Dr. Michael Fox and Dr. Richard Bauer. The remaining claims will be 

dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: December 7, 2015 

Case 2:13-cv-01834-TLN-CKD Document 54 Filed 12/08/15 Page 2 of 2