Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-01078/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-01078-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332df Diversity-Contract Default

---

– 1 – 12cv1078

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDU-SCIENCE (USA) INC.,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 12-cv-1078-BAS-JLB

SECOND AMENDED FINAL 

JUDGMENT

v.

INTUBRITE LLC,

Defendant.

INTUBRITE LLC,

Counterclaimant,

v.

EDU-SCIENCE (USA) INC.; EDUSCIENCE (HK) LTD,

Counterdefendants.

AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS.

On August 26, 2015, after five days of trial, an impaneled jury of seven 

persons returned a special verdict in the instant action. The jury found:

1. Defendant IntuBrite LLC (“IntuBrite”) was not liable to Plaintiff EduScience (USA) Inc. for breach of contract; 

Case 3:12-cv-01078-BAS-JLB Document 203 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 3
– 2 – 12cv1078

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Counterdefendant Edu-Science (USA) Inc. was liable to Counterclaimant 

IntuBrite for breach of contract;

3. IntuBrite suffered $0 in damages as a result of Edu-Science (USA)’s 

breach of contract;

4. Counterdefendant Edu-Science (HK) Ltd. was not liable to 

Counterclaimant IntuBrite for breach of contract;

5. Counterdefendant Edu-Science (USA) Inc. was not liable to 

Counterclaimant IntuBrite for breach of the implied warranty of 

merchantability; and

6. Counterdefendant Edu-Science (HK) Ltd. was not liable to 

Counterclaimant IntuBrite for breach of the implied warranty of 

merchantability.

In a judgment entered on Novermber 5, 2015, the Court entered judgment in 

favor of IntuBrite on the latter’s breach of contract claim against Edu-Science 

(USA), even though the jury found that IntuBrite suffered no damages. On 

December 3, 2015, Edu-Science (USA) and Edu-Science (HK) (“Edu-Science 

parties”) filed a motion to amend the judgment noting this mistake and requesting 

that judgment be entered in favor of the Edu-Science parties on Intubrite’s 

counterclaims. (ECF No. 195.) The Court entered an Amended Judgment on 

December 11, 2015. (ECF No. 199.) On December 28, 2015, IntuBrite filed a motion 

to amend the Amended Judgment requesting judgment be entered in favor of 

IntuBrite on Edu-Science (USA) Inc.’s breach of contract claim. (ECF No. 200.) The 

motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the following:

(1)The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in favor of IntuBrite on EduScience (USA) Inc.’s claim for breach of contract.

(2)The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in favor of Edu-Science (USA) 

Inc. on IntuBrite’s counterclaim for breach of contract.

(3)The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in favor of Edu-Science (USA) 

Case 3:12-cv-01078-BAS-JLB Document 203 Filed 04/05/16 Page 2 of 3
– 3 – 12cv1078

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Inc. on IntuBrite’s counterclaim for breach of the implied warranty of 

merchantability.

(4)The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in favor of Edu-Science (HK) on 

IntuBrite’s counterclaim for breach of the implied warranty of 

merchantability.

(5) The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in favor of Edu-Science (HK) on 

Intubrite’s counterclaim for breach of contract.

The Court’s Amended Judgment entered on December 11, 2015 is hereby 

VACATED. (ECF No. 199.) IntuBrite’s motion to amend the judgment is 

GRANTED. (ECF No. 200.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 5, 2016

Case 3:12-cv-01078-BAS-JLB Document 203 Filed 04/05/16 Page 3 of 3