Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00690/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00690-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GERALD SPENCE,

Plaintiff, 2:05-cv-0690-GEB-KJM-P

vs.

DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 8, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

side has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and

recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility

to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f),

service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

Case 2:05-cv-00690-GEB -KJM Document 29 Filed 03/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 8, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ June 1, 2006 motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies is denied; and

3. Defendants’ June 1, 2006 motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim with

regard to the First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Doyle and Unterreiner are

granted, and the case proceed on the remaining claims against defendants Peddicord, Lynn,

Fleming, Urquizu, Madrigal, Hamilton, Salenger and Fleischman.

Dated: March 6, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00690-GEB -KJM Document 29 Filed 03/06/07 Page 2 of 2