Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01203/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01203-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEE V. QUILLAR, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1203 FCD KJM P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On December 20, 2005, plaintiff filed a document titled “Motion To Amend

Order.” The court construes this as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s

December 6, 2005 order denying plaintiff injunctive relief. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-

303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 

Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s

ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01203-KJM-CKD Document 50 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s December 20, 2005

“Motion To Amend Order” is denied.

DATED:September 26, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01203-KJM-CKD Document 50 Filed 09/26/06 Page 2 of 2