Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01961/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01961-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TOM BAUSER, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB 

RELATED CASE ORDER 

Related to Nos.: 

2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV—01957 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV-01960 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV-01961 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV—01965 JAM-EFB 

1:15-CV-01721 JAM-EFB 

1:15-CV-01748 JAM-EFB 

1:15-CV-01874 JAM-EFB 

2:15-CV-00429 JAM-EFB 

2:15-CV-00622 JAM-EFB 

2:15-CV-00623 JAM-EFB 

2:15-CV-02150 JAM-EFB 

2:15-CV-02396 JAM-EFB 

DESTREA BELL, LOUIS SERPA, and 

AGNES MARCALLINO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: 1:15-CV-01872 JAM-JLT 

Case 2:14-cv-01961-JAM-EFB Document 34 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 

RAMON HURTADO, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

 

 Defendants.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 2:15-CV-02594 JAM-AC 

ROBERT L. HOLLANDSWORTH, an 

individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 2:15-CV-02597 JAM-CMK 

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these 

actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 

2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same 

judge and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial 

savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for 

the parties. 

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under 

Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are 

assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation 

of the actions is effected. Under the regular practice of this 

court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and 

magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge assignment 

in the actions denominated 1:15-CV-01872 JAM-JLT, 2:15-CV-02594 

JAM-AC and 2:15-CV-02597 JAM-CMK be reassigned to Magistrate Judge 

Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings. Henceforth, the 

caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown 

Case 2:14-cv-01961-JAM-EFB Document 34 Filed 01/25/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 3 

as 1:15-CV-01872 JAM-EFB, 2:15-CV-02594 JAM-EFB and 2:15-CV-02597 

JAM-EFB. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 22, 2016 

 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ 

 JOHN A. MENDEZ 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:14-cv-01961-JAM-EFB Document 34 Filed 01/25/16 Page 3 of 3