Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00004/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00004-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK RUSSELL HARSHMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00004-SAB

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO 

SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF’S 

SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL SHOULD 

NOT BE DEEMED UNOPPOSED

TEN DAY DEADLINE

On December 9, 2015, an order issued amending the scheduling order in this action. 

Plaintiff filed his opening brief on February 11, 2016. Pursuant to the December 9, 2016 order, 

Defendant’s responsive brief was due on March 14, 2016. Defendant has not filed an opposition 

brief. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of 

service of this order, Defendant shall either file a written response to this order to show cause 

why Plaintiff’s opening brief should not be deemed unopposed or file an opposition to Plaintiff’s 

opening brief. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00004-SAB Document 20 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 1