Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01652/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01652-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On December 23, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action. (Doc. 29) 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action 

without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 

appeared.”. . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not 

required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 

111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this 

action in light of the notice of dismissal with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 

41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 27, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ARTURO MORALES,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-1652 JLT

ORDER CLOSING THE CASE

(Doc. 29)

Case 1:15-cv-01652-JLT Document 30 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 1