Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alsd-1_08-cv-00646/USCOURTS-alsd-1_08-cv-00646-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

 ) 

LEE HENRY McGREW, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff/ Counter Defendant, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-0646-CG-M 

 ) 

CHOCTAW COUNTY COMMISSION, ) 

 ) 

Defendant/Counter Plaintiff. ) 

ORDER

This matter is before the court for default judgment as to counter-plaintiff’s claims against 

counter-defendant, Lee Henry McGrew. Summary judgment was previously granted in favor of 

defendant regarding all of plaintiffs’ claims (Doc. 76), and defendant reports that it has settled its 

counterclaims against counter defendants, Maurice Fitch and Robert Cotrell (Doc. 87). The only 

remaining claim is defendant’s counterclaims against Mr. McGrew. Default was previously 

entered by the clerk as to the counterclaims against Mr. McGrew. (Doc. 89). On June, 17, 2010, 

an evidentiary hearing was held and testimony was offered to support counter-plaintiff’s claim for 

damages against Mr. McGrew. Mr. McGrew, pro se, participated in the hearing. He crossexamined some of counter-plaintiff’s witnesses and testified himself when called by counterplaintiff. After review of the record and the testimony and evidence offered at the hearing, the 

court finds that counter-plaintiff is entitled to judgment in the amount of $20,902.77. 

 The effect of a default is that the defendant admits the plaintiff's well-pleaded allegations 

of fact. See Buchanan v. Bowman, 820 F.2d 359, 361 (11th Cir. 1987). Although a defaulted 

defendant admits well-pleaded allegations of liability, allegations relating to the amount of 

Case 1:08-cv-00646-CG-M Document 97 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 3
2 

damages are not admitted by virtue of default. Rather, the court determines the amount and 

character of damages to be awarded. See 10A CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT, ARTHUR R. MILLER &

MARY KAY KANE, FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE ' 2688 (3d ed. 1998).

The counterclaim asserts claims for falsifying records, several different kinds of fraud, 

deceit, negligence, civil conspiracy, and unjust enrichment. (Doc. 31). The basis for counterplaintiff’s claims is that, while employed by Choctaw County, Alabama, Mr. McGrew reported 

more time on his timesheets than he actually worked, and was therefore overpaid. (Doc. 31, p. 3). 

 Counter-plaintiff presented evidence showing the difference between the time recorded on 

McGrew’s time sheets and the time he actually worked during the 3-year period from April 2004 

to April 2007. The evidence presented showed that the time recording differences resulted in 

McGrew being overpaid by $20,902.77 during that time period. Counter-plaintiff also presented 

evidence that, if the average pay period difference was extrapolated out over 6 years of McGrew’s 

employment, the resulting overpayment would be $43,867.09. However, counter-plaintiff did not 

obtain or use the time sheet and radio logs for those portions of the 6-year period other than from 

April 2004 to April 2007 to determine the actual overpayment. As such, the court finds that 

counter-plaintiff has not proved what the difference was between the time recorded on McGrew’s 

time sheets and the time he actually worked during the additional 3 years. An extrapolation from 

the average overpayment in the April 2004 to April 2007 time period is not a sufficient basis of 

proof for the additional time period. 

The court finds that the record and evidence provided supports a finding that McGrew was 

overpaid in the amount of $20,902.77, The court, therefore, finds that counter plaintiff should be 

awarded damages in that amount. 

Case 1:08-cv-00646-CG-M Document 97 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 3
3 

CONCLUSION 

For the reasons stated above, judgment will be entered against Lee Henry McGrew and 

in favor of Choctaw County Commission in the amount of $20,902.77 plus attorneys fees and 

costs. Counter-plaintiff is ORDERED to file, on or before July 7, 2010, an accounting and 

supporting documents regarding its claimed attorneys fees and costs solely as they relate to the 

counterclaim against Lee Henry McGrew. 

DONE and ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2010. 

 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:08-cv-00646-CG-M Document 97 Filed 06/21/10 Page 3 of 3