Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_11-cv-08093/USCOURTS-azd-3_11-cv-08093-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James Luther Jones Junior, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Mohave County; Carol Meier, Mohave

County Recorder, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-8093-PCT-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court are: (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 29); (2)

Plaintiff’s Motion for Rule 16 Conference (Doc. 34); (3) Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on

the Pleadings (Doc. 36); and (4) Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 37). The

Court now rules on the Motions.

In its January 11, 2012 Order, the Court previously granted a Motion to Dismiss in

favor of Defendants in this case. In that Order, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend,

but warned Plaintiff that, in his amended Complaint, he needed to cure the deficiencies

identified in that Order, and to provide Defendants with notice of the factual basis of his

claims in short plain statements in the manner required by Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure. (Doc. 25). 

Defendant now moves for dismissal of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. Because

Plaintiff has failed to cure any of the deficiencies identified in the Court’s prior Order and

Case 3:11-cv-08093-JAT Document 43 Filed 06/22/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

has failed to meet the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 12(b)(6),

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is granted. 

Based on the foregoing,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 29) is granted. This

case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment

accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions (Doc. 34, Doc. 36.,

Doc. 37) are denied as moot. 

DATED this 22nd day of June, 2012.

Case 3:11-cv-08093-JAT Document 43 Filed 06/22/12 Page 2 of 2