Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_15-cv-00954/USCOURTS-almd-2_15-cv-00954-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12201 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CHARLIE J. BARBER, II,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a, 

VERIZON WIRELESS, 

 

Defendant. 

 

 )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-954-WKW

ORDER

On April 20, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no 

timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 15.) Upon an independent review of the 

file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that 

(1) The Recommendation (Doc. # 15) is ADOPTED; 

(2) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 10) is DENIED in part as to the 

arguments under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3); 

(3) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), this case is TRANSFERRED to the

Northern District of Alabama, Northeastern Division; and

(4) The remaining part of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 10) shall 

remain pending for adjudication in the Northern District of Alabama.

Case 2:15-cv-00954-WKW-TFM Document 17 Filed 05/23/16 Page 1 of 2
Additionally, Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend EEOC Complaint (Doc. # 16) shall 

remain pending for adjudication by the Northern District of Alabama.

DONE this 23rd day of May, 2016.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00954-WKW-TFM Document 17 Filed 05/23/16 Page 2 of 2