Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05556/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05556-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD WARD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al.,

Defendants. ____________________________________ 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-5556 MMC (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On September 11, 20006, plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the

above-titled civil rights action. On September 13, 2006, the Court notified plaintiff in

writing that the action was deficient due to his failure to pay the requisite filing fee or,

instead, submit a completed court-approved in forma pauperis ("IFP") application. 

Specifically, plaintiff was informed that he had failed to include the required trust account

statement showing transactions for the preceding six months and a certificate of funds

form signed by an institution official. In said notice, plaintiff was advised that his failure

to pay the filing fee or, alternatively, to file a completed IFP application, including the

trust account statement and the signed certificate of funds form, within thirty days, would

result in dismissal of the action. Along with said notice, plaintiff was sent a copy of the

Court’s IFP application, instructions for completing it, and a return envelope. To date,

plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a completed IFP application.

Case 3:06-cv-05556-MMC Document 3 Filed 01/03/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

As more than thirty days have passed since the deficiency notice and plaintiff has

not completed the IFP application or paid the filing fee, the above-titled action is hereby

DISMISSED without prejudice. 

The incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED. 

The Clerk shall close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 3, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05556-MMC Document 3 Filed 01/03/07 Page 2 of 2