Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-293/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-03561 WHA

ORDER GRANTING PRÉCIS

REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE

MOTION TO STRIKE AND

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE

SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER

Google has filed two précis requests. First, Google seeks to file a supplemental answer

to include an additional license defense that applies “to the extent Oracle accuses versions of

Android using OpenJDK-based code” (Dkt. No. 1443 at 2). Second, Google seeks to file a

motion to strike portions of Oracle’s opening expert reports that relate to allegations that

Google infringed new versions of Java to be heard on an expedited schedule in light of the

February 8 deadline to serve rebuttal reports (Dkt. No. 1445). Google avers it stands ready to

file both motions. 

As to Google’s first request, Oracle responds that it has not accused any version of

Android containing the OpenJDK code (Dkt. No. 1451). By NOON ON JANUARY 27, Google

shall inform the Court whether this moots its proposed defense.

Google’s second request is GRANTED. Google shall file its motion by NOON ON

JANUARY 27. Oracle shall respond by NOON ON FEBRUARY 1. A hearing on the motion is

hereby SET for FEBRUARY 2 AT 11:00 A.M.

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1453 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

For the avoidance of any confusion, the parties should continue to adhere to the précis

procedure set forth in the earlier phase of this case (Dkt. No. 86).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1453 Filed 01/26/16 Page 2 of 2