Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00214/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00214-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The United States Postal Service returned the order served on Petitioner on May 10, 2005, as undeliverable. A

notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender ~ Not in Custody. However, Petitioner has not notified the court of

any change in address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(d).

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SONIA MEDERO-NARANJO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION )

SERVICE, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-00214-REC-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 7)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On April 25, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and

Recommendation that this action be DISMISSED based on Petitioner's

failure to obey the court's order of March 10, 2005. This Report

and Recommendation was served on Petitioner and contained notice

that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from

the date of service of that order. To date, Petitioner has not

filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.1

Case 1:05-cv-00214-REC-DLB Document 9 Filed 06/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is supported by

the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed April 25, 2005, is

ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on petitioner's failure to

obey the court's order of March 10, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00214-REC-DLB Document 9 Filed 06/10/05 Page 2 of 2