Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02104/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02104-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., )

) 2:07-cv-02104-GEB-DAD

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

JOSE GUADALUPE PRADO and ) CONFERENCE

MARIA ELENA PRADO, individually )

and d/b/a/ RESTAURANTE DEL PRADO, )

) 

Defendants. )

)

Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for an Order Continuing

Case Management Conference filed November 27, 2007, reveals this case

is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status (Pretrial

Scheduling) Conference set for December 17, 2007 is continued to March

3, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report shall be filed no

later than February 19, 2008.

Plaintiff is hereby notified that this action may be

dismissed without prejudice as to one or both of the Defendants under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) if the Defendants are not served

by February 4, 2008. To avoid dismissal, a proof of service shall be

filed for each of the Defendants no later than February 4, 2008. 

Case 2:07-cv-02104-GEB-DAD Document 6 Filed 11/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If Plaintiff believes it has good cause to justify extension

of Rule 4(m)’s 120-day service period for Defendants, it shall file a

declaration no later than February 4, 2008, showing good cause why the

action should not be dismissed without prejudice as to one or both of

the Defendants. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 29, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-02104-GEB-DAD Document 6 Filed 11/30/07 Page 2 of 2