Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04369/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04369-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOAH BUTLER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

UNITED AIR LINES, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 07-04369 CRB

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE

MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE

Plaintiffs’ ex parte motion to continue the hearing on the parties’ summary judgment

motions is DENIED. Plaintiffs have not shown that plaintiffs’ counsel’s late January trial

necessitates a continuance. The Court set the February 29, 2008 deadline at the case

management conference on November 30, 2007 and plaintiffs did not object or make any

mention of plaintiffs’ counsel’s January jury trial. Indeed, in a letter to defendant’s counsel

dated December 10, 2007, plaintiffs refused to grant defendant any continuances to respond

to plaintiffs’ discovery requests because, in part, of counsel’s January jury trial.

Plaintiffs, however, may file their opposition on or before February 15, 2008, and

defendant’s reply shall be filed on or before February 22, 2008. The Court will hear oral 

//

//

//

Case 3:07-cv-04369-CRB Document 65 Filed 02/11/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2007\4369\orderrecontinuance.wpd 2

argument at 8:30 a.m. on February 29, 2008 as originally scheduled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2008 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-04369-CRB Document 65 Filed 02/11/08 Page 2 of 2