Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00537/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00537-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 441
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Voting
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KEITH JUDD, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BARACK OBAMA, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-0537 KJM AC (PS) 

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has for the third time failed to comply with the court’s orders 

that he file a statement with the court affirming that he has submitted the required service 

documents to the United States Marshal. 

 On May 23, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to file the statement within 21 days. See ECF 

No. 3 ¶ 5. Plaintiff requested and received an extension of time, and was ordered to file the 

statement no later than September 20, 2013. See ECF No. 8. When this order was returned as 

“undeliverable,” and no forwarding address was supplied, the court recommended that the action 

be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 9. After plaintiff supplied a new address, the 

court vacated the dismissal recommendation and ordered plaintiff to file the statement no later 

than September 19, 2014. ECF No. 11. On September 2, 2014, plaintiff notified the court of 

another change of address (ECF No. 12), but to date, he still has not filed the required statement. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 

Case 2:13-cv-00537-KJM-AC Document 13 Filed 06/05/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: June 4, 2015 

Case 2:13-cv-00537-KJM-AC Document 13 Filed 06/05/15 Page 2 of 2