Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-220/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE TOSHIBA DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 

TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(d) 

Case No. 07-5944 SC 

MDL No. 1917

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

White & Case LLP

701 Thirteenth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

Case No. 07-5944 SC 

MDL No. 1917 

This Document Relates to 

Case No. 13-cv-1173-SC (N.D. Cal.) 

SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; 

SHARP ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

HITACHI, LTD., et al., 

 Defendants.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

THE TOSHIBA DEFENDANTS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 

RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(d) 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2386 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE TOSHIBA DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 

TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(d) 

Case No. 07-5944 SC 

MDL No. 1917

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

White & Case LLP

701 Thirteenth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20005

 Upon consideration of the Toshiba Defendants’ Administrative Motion to File 

Document Under Seal Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(d), submitted in 

connection with the Toshiba Defendants’ Opposition to Sharp’s Motion for Leave to File 

Response to the Toshiba Defendants’ Supplemental Reply Brief, it is hereby: 

ORDERED that the Administrative Motion is hereby GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that the Clerk shall file and maintain under seal the portions of the Toshiba 

Defendants’ Opposition to Sharp’s Motion for Leave to File Response to the Toshiba 

Defendants’ Supplemental Reply Brief that contain discussion of discovery responses that 

the parties have designated as “Confidential.” 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ ______________________________ 

 HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2/12/2014

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2386 Filed 02/12/14 Page 2 of 2