Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-06545/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-06545-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GO DADDY OPERATING COMPANY, 

LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

USMAN GHAZNAVI, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-06545-PJH 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO 

ALL PARTIES

Trial is scheduled to begin in this action on January 27, 2020. Dkt. 96. The pretrial conference is scheduled for December 19, 2019. Id. No party has filed a motion for 

summary judgment, and the time to do so has passed. Id. Each party was required to 

file pretrial papers by November 21, 2019. See Dkt. 80 at 3–4. Each party missed that 

deadline. The parties were required to file, inter alia, a joint pretrial statement, their trial 

briefs, any motions in limine, lists of deposition excerpts and other discovery responses 

that will be offered at trial, lists of witnesses to be called at trial, exhibit lists, proposed 

joint voir dire questions, a proposed verdict form, and joint jury instructions. No party has 

filed any of those materials. In fact, no party has filed anything in this action since 

January 2, 2019.

As such, there court hereby issues an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why plaintiff's 

claims should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and why sanctions should not issue as to all parties for 

failure to comply with the court’s deadlines.

Each party is ordered to file a written response to this order on or before 

Case 4:17-cv-06545-PJH Document 101 Filed 11/22/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

November 27, 2019. If plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the action shall be 

dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a court 

order. Additionally, sanctions shall issue. If any defendant fails to comply with this order, 

sanctions shall issue.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 22, 2019

/s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:17-cv-06545-PJH Document 101 Filed 11/22/19 Page 2 of 2