Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-00647/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-00647-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This disposition is not designated for publication and may not be cited. 1

Case No. C 03-647 JF (PVT)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ORDER VACATING TRIAL DATE AND

SETTING A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

(JFLC3)

**E-Filed 01/08/08**

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ARTHUR G. MAIONCHI, et al., 

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION,

 Defendant.

Case Number C 03-647 JF (PVT)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 1

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR

ORDER VACATING TRIAL DATE

AND SETTING A CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

[re: doc. no. 166, 172]

Plaintiffs bring the instant motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11, seeking to vacate the trial

and pretrial dates in the instant case. Plaintiffs assert that the parties cannot agree about the

scope of the matters to be litigated at trial and request that the Court convert the pretrial

conference date currently scheduled for January 18, 2008 to a case management conference. 

Union Pacific opposes the motion.

Case 5:03-cv-00647-JF Document 175 Filed 01/08/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 03-647 JF (PVT)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ORDER VACATING TRIAL DATE AND 

SETTING A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

(JFLC3)

The evidence and arguments having been considered, the motion to vacate the pretrial

conference is denied and the motion to vacate the trial date is denied without prejudice. The

Court will address Plaintiffs’ concerns regarding the scope of the trial at the pretrial conference

and will adjust the trial schedule at that time should such an adjustment be necessary. Plaintiffs’

motion for administrative relief to file a reply in support of their administrative motion for order

vacating trial date and setting a case management conference is denied as moot.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 01/08/08 _____________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:03-cv-00647-JF Document 175 Filed 01/08/08 Page 2 of 2