Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01839/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01839-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2006\1839\ORDERreMarkmanQs_revisedQ5.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELANTECH DEVICES CORP.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SYNAPTICS, INC.;

AVERATEC, INC.,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-01839 CRB

ORDER

The following question replaces question number five with respect to the ’352 patent:

What intrinsic evidence supports or refutes a construction of “identify a first maxima” as

“identify a first absolute measured value within a region, the value being greater than all

other absolute measured values in the region”?

Each side will be permitted no more than 45 minutes for argument for all questions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 20, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-01839-PVT Document 89 Filed 03/20/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2006\1839\ORDERreMarkmanQs_revisedQ5.wpd 2

Case 5:06-cv-01839-PVT Document 89 Filed 03/20/07 Page 2 of 2