Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04375/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04375-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1 KEKER&VANNEST,LLP

JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649

2 RAGESH K. TANGRI - #159477

ASHOK RAMANI - #200020

3 710 Sansome Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704

4 Telephone: (415) 391-5400

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff

6 CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.

7

8

9

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., a

11 Delaware corporation,

Case No. C 03-4375 JW (RS)

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) 12 Plaintiff, DISMISSAL ORDER

13 v.

14 XIANGFENG "SEAN" CHEN, an individual;

CHUN XIA, an individual; and VASTA

15 TECHNOLOGIES, a California corporation,

16 Defendants.

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & (PROPOSED) DISMISSAL ORDER

CASE NO. C 03-4375 JW (RS)

Case 5:03-cv-04375-JW Document 96 Filed 05/25/07 Page 1 of 4
1 On May 24,2007, Cadence Design Systems, Inc., Xiangfeng "Sean" Chen, Chun Xia,

2 and Vasta Technologies, the parties to the above-captioned matter ("Parties"), entered into a

3 settlement agreement ("Agreement"). The Agreement requires the Parties to dismiss with

4 prejudice all claims and counterclaims in the above-captioned matter. Federal Rule of Civil

5 Procedure 41 provides that the paries may dismiss their claims with prejudice via stipulation.

6 That agreement further requires that the Parties request that this Court retain jurisdiction over the

7 above-captioned matter, to adjudicate any matters arising out of or relating to the Agreement or

8 the contemporaneously filed Stipulated Permanent Injunction.

9 NOW THEREFORE the Parties, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, hereby

10 dismiss with prejudice all claims and counterclaims in the above-captioned action. Each Party is

11 to bear its own costs.

12 The Paries FURTHER STIPULATE to this Court's retaining jurisdiction over the above13 captioned matter, to adjudicate any matters arising out of or relating to the Agreement or the

14 contemporaneously fied Stipulated Permanent Injunction.

15 Dated: May 24, 2007

16

17

18

19

20

Dated:

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

By: Isl Ashok Ramani

ASHOK RAMANI

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.

MANCHESTER WILLIAMS & SEIBERT

By:

STEVEN ROWE MANCHESTER

Attorneys for Defendants

VASTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

XIANGFENG "SEAN" CHEN, AND

CHUN XIA

STIP. & (PROPOSED) DISMISSAL ORDER

CASE NO. C 03-4375 JW (RS)

353553.01

Case 5:03-cv-04375-JW Document 96 Filed 05/25/07 Page 2 of 4
353553.01

1

2

On May 24,2007, Cadence Design Systems, Inc., Xiangfeng "Sean" Chen, Chun Xia,

'l

.J

and Vasta Technologies, the paries to the above-captioned matter ("Paries"), entered into a

settlement agreement ("Agreement"). The Agreement requires the Paries to dismiss with

prejudice allc1aisand counterclaims in the above-captioned matter. Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41 provides that the paries may dismiss their claims with prejudice via stipulation.

That agreement fuher requires that the Paries request that tlis Cour retain jursdiction over the

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

above-captioned matter, to adjudicate any matters arsing out of or relating to the Agreement or

the contemporaneously filed Stipulated Permanent Injunction.

. NOW THEREFORE the Paries, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, hereby

dismiss with prejudice all claims and counterclaims in the above-captioned action. Each Par is

to bear its own costs.

The Paries FURTHER STIPULATE to tlis Cour's retaining jurisdiction over the abovecaptioned matter, to adjudicate any matters arising out 'of or relating to the Agreement or the

contemporaneously fied Stipulated Permanent Injunction.

Dated: KEKER & V AN NEST, LLP

By:

ASHOK RAI

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.

19

20 Dated:

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

?R

MACHESTER WILLIAMS & SEIBERT

BY~£-~

STEVENR E MA ESTER

Attorneys for Defendants

VASTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

XIANGFENG "SEAN" CHEN, AN

CHUN XIA

STIP. & (PROPOSED) DISMISSAL ORDER

CASE NO. C 03-4375 JW (RS)

Case 5:03-cv-04375-JW Document 96 Filed 05/25/07 Page 3 of 4
353553.01

1

2 Dated:

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT is SO ORDERED.

By:

THE HON. JAMES WARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

STIP. & (PROPOSED) DISMISSAL ORDER

CASE NO. C 03-4375 JW (RS)

May 25 2007

Case 5:03-cv-04375-JW Document 96 Filed 05/25/07 Page 4 of 4