Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-03658/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-03658-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND EXTENDING TIME TO FILE 

Case No. C-08-03658 JF (PVT) 

sf-2800751 

JORDAN ETH (BAR NO. 121617) 

JEth@mofo.com 

ANNA ERICKSON WHITE (BAR NO. 161385) 

AWhite@mofo.com 

RACHAEL CLARKE (BAR NO. 248844) 

RClarke@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 268-6000 

Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ANDREW KNOPF 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

TERRY SEMEL, MICHAEL J. CALLAHAN, 

JERRY YANG, ROY J. BOSTOCK, RONALD 

W. BURKLE, ERIC HIPPEAU, VYOMESH 

JOSHI, ARTHUR H. KERN, ROBERT A. 

KOTICK, EDWARD R. KOZEL, GARY L. 

WILSON, and MAGGIE WILDEROTTER 

 Defendants 

 v. 

YAHOO! INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Nominal Defendant

Case No. C-08-03658 JF (PVT) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

AND EXTENDING TIME TO FILE 

REPLY BRIEF 

 

**E-Filed 2/18/2010**

------------------

Case 5:08-cv-03658-JF Document 58 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND EXTENDING TIME TO FILE 

Case No. C-08-03658 JF (PVT) 

 

 2 

sf-2800751 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, 7-7, and 7-12, the parties, by and through their 

respective counsel, respectfully request that the Court grant, in the form of an Order, the parties’ 

stipulated request to continue the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint (the “Motion to Dismiss”) and extending Defendants’ time to file their reply 

brief. In support of this stipulated request, the parties state as follows: 

WHEREAS, Defendants filed their motion to dismiss (the “Motion to Dismiss”) on December 

11, 2009 and noticed a hearing on that Motion to Dismiss for March 5, 2010; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel filed an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on January 21, 

2010 and Defendants’ reply brief is currently due on February 19, 2010; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel is now scheduled to appear in San Diego for oral argument 

before the Ninth Circuit on the afternoon of March 4, 2010, making it difficult for Plaintiff’s counsel 

to travel to and prepare for a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss before this Court at 9 a.m. the next 

day; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel requested, and Defendants’ counsel agreed, to continue the 

date of the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss to March 12, 2010 and extend by a week Defendants’ 

time to file their reply brief; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel contacted chambers and confirmed that March 12, 2010 was a 

convenient date for the Court; 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

Case 5:08-cv-03658-JF Document 58 Filed 02/18/10 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND EXTENDING TIME TO FILE 

Case No. C-08-03658 JF (PVT) 

 

 3 

sf-2800751 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that the hearing date on the Motion to 

Dismiss is continued until March 12, 2010.1 

The parties further stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court enter an Order, that 

Defendants’ time to file their reply brief is extended through and until February 26, 2010. 

Dated: February 11, 2010 JORDAN ETH 

ANNA ERICKSON WHITE 

RACHAEL CLARKE 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Anna Erickson White 

Anna Erickson White 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: February 11, 2010 JORDAN L. LURIE 

LEIGH A. PARKER 

ZEV B. ZYSMAN 

JOEL E. ELKINS 

WEISS & LURIE 

By: /s/ Leigh A. Parker 

Leigh A. Parker 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________ __________________________________________ 

 Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

 United States District Judge 

 

1

 Filed concurrently herewith is a Notice of Continuance. 

2/18/2010

Case 5:08-cv-03658-JF Document 58 Filed 02/18/10 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND EXTENDING TIME TO FILE 

Case No. C-08-03658 JF (PVT) 

 

 4 

sf-2800751 

GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION 

I, Rachael Clarke, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Continuance of Case Management Conference. In 

compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Anna Erickson White and Leigh A. 

Parker have concurred in this filing. 

 /s/ Rachael Clarke Rachael Clarke 

Case 5:08-cv-03658-JF Document 58 Filed 02/18/10 Page 4 of 4