Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01872/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01872-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANDEEP SINGH,

Plaintiff,

v.

UR M. JADDOU, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:24-cv-1872 DJC AC PS

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was 

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On November 4, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 

recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice 

to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 

within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and 

recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to 

be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Having 

considered the factors described in Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 

1992) the Court finds that dismissal is appropriate.

////

Case 2:24-cv-01872-DJC-AC Document 14 Filed 01/10/25 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 4, 2024, are adopted in 

full; and

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for 

failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 9, 2025 

Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-01872-DJC-AC Document 14 Filed 01/10/25 Page 2 of 2