Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01668/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01668-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS; ADR CERTIFICATION

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY 

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. USA, 

Defendants and Counterclaimants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668-RMW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

ADR CERTIFICATION

The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

 Arbitration ENE Mediation 

Private Process:

 Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

_______________________________________________________________________ 

Dated: September 2, 2005 HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Lawrence M. Hadley 

Lawrence M. Hadley 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY 

CORPORATION, 

*E-FILED - 10/5/05*

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 17 Filed 10/05/05 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS; ADR CERTIFICATION

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

-2- PALIB1_2699785_1.DOC 

Dated: September 2, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Matthew R. Reed 

Matthew R. Reed 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. USA 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: ____________________________________ 

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

10/5/05 /S/ RONALD M. WHYTE

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 17 Filed 10/05/05 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS; ADR CERTIFICATION

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

-3- PALIB1_2699785_1.DOC 

SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL 

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 16 and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), each of the undersigned certifies that he 

or she has read either the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern 

District of California,” or the specified portions of the ADR Unit’s Internet site 

<www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov>, discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by 

the court and private entities, and considered whether this case might benefit from any of them. 

(Note: This Certification must be signed by each party and its counsel.)

Dated: September 2, 2005 COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY 

CORPORATION, 

By: /s/ Robert Berman 

Robert Berman 

Dated: September 2, 2005 HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Lawrence M. Hadley 

Lawrence M. Hadley 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY 

CORPORATION, 

Dated: September 2, 2005 VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. USA 

By: /s/ Claire Lin 

Claire Lin 

Dated: September 2, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Matthew R. Reed 

Matthew R. Reed 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. USA 

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 17 Filed 10/05/05 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS; ADR CERTIFICATION

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

-4- PALIB1_2699785_1.DOC 

CERTIFICATION

I, Matthew R. Reed, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report, Joint Case Management Statement and [Proposed] Case 

Management Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Lawrence 

Hadley and Robert Berman have concurred in this filing. 

Dated: September 2, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Matthew R. Reed 

Matthew R. Reed 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. USA 

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 17 Filed 10/05/05 Page 4 of 4