Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-01886/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-01886-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA 

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOWN OF DANVILLE,

Defendant.

Case No. 19-cv-01886-JCS 

ORDER GRANTING DANVILLE 

CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE 

GROWTH'S MOTION TO 

INTERVENE

Re: Dkt. No. 40

On October 31, 2019, Danville Citizens for Responsible Growth (“DCRG”) filed a motion 

to intervene in this action. Plaintiff GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership d/b/a 

Verizon Wireless (“Verizon Wireless”) opposed DCRG’s motion to intervene. Defendant Town 

of Danville filed a non-opposition to DCRG’s motion to intervene. Having reviewed the parties’ 

submissions, the Court concludes that this matter is suitable for decision without a hearing. 

DCRG’s motion to intervene is GRANTED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b).

1 2

The Court HEREBY ORDERS the following:

1. DCRG must file its opposition to Verizon Wireless’ motion for partial summary 

judgment no later than December 6, 2019; 

2. Verizon Wireless may file its reply to DCRG’s opposition no later than December 

13, 2019; 

3. The December 6, 2019 hearings for DCRG’s motion to intervene and Verizon 

 

1 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(c). In addition, the proposed intervenor has consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

2 Although DCRG did not seek permissive leave to intervene under subdivision (b), the Court 

finds permissive intervention to be appropriate.

Case 3:19-cv-01886-JCS Document 45 Filed 11/22/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Wireless’ motion for partial summary judgment are hereby vacated; and 

4. The hearing of Verizon Wireless’ motion for partial summary judgment is 

continued to January 10, 2020, at 9:30 AM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor before 

Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. 

The parties may agree on a different briefing schedule and submit it to the court for 

approval.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 22, 2019

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:19-cv-01886-JCS Document 45 Filed 11/22/19 Page 2 of 2