Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02172/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02172-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISING LLC, 

a Delaware limited liability 

company; BR IP HOLDER LLC, a 

Delaware limited liability 

company; and DB REAL ESTATE 

ASSETS I, LLC, a Delaware 

limited liability company,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

REENA SINGH, an individual, and 

HARDEEP SINGH, an individual,

 Defendants.

______________________________/

Case No. 2:09-cv-02172-JAM-DAD

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court after consideration of Plaintiffs Baskin-Robbins 

Franchising LLC’s (“BRF”), BR IP Holder LLC’s (“BR IP”), and DB 

Real Estate Assets I, LLC’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or 

“Basin Robbins”) Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment (the “Motion”), Memorandum of Points and Authorities in 

support thereof, the Statement of Undisputed Facts, the 

Declarations of Judith B. Gitterman, Gary Zullig, and Jim Scharf 

Case 2:09-cv-02172-JAM-DAD Document 24 Filed 07/08/10 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

with supporting evidence, the pleadings and other documents on 

file in this matter, and based on the undisputed facts contained 

in the record, finds the following:

The undisputed facts show that there is no genuine issue of 

material fact as to Plaintiffs’ cause of action for breach of 

contract against Defendant Reena Singh. The undisputed facts 

establish the existence of a franchise agreement and sublease 

agreement between the parties, which was breached by Defendant 

Reena Singh without excuse by failing to pay rents, property 

taxes, royalties, advertising fees and other related fees, 

including interest, to Plaintiffs as required by the agreements. 

Plaintiffs have established through uncontroverted evidence that 

payment is currently past due. Defendant Reena Singh did not 

file any opposition to the motion. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are 

entitled to partial summary judgment as to the breach of 

contract cause of action against Defendant Reena Singh.

IT IS SO ORDERED that the Motion is hereby GRANTED and that 

Defendant Reena Singh owes to Plaintiffs $124,551.17, plus 

interest.

Dated: July 7, 2010

Case 2:09-cv-02172-JAM-DAD Document 24 Filed 07/08/10 Page 2 of 2