Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00656/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00656-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CONFID. DOCS.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114)

JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268)

GENEVIEVE K. GUERTIN (State Bar No. 262479)

T. KENNEDY HELM (State Bar No. 282319)

HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP

505 Seventeenth Street

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-5500

Fax: (510) 452-5510

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Lisa Moore and Eugene Moore

CLAUDIA M. QUINTANA

City Attorney, SBN 178613

BY: FURAH Z. FARUQUI

Deputy City Attorney, SBN 233083

CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall

555 Santa Clara Street, P.O. Box 3068

Vallejo, CA 94590

Tel: (707) 648-4545 // Fax: (707) 648-4687

Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF VALLEJO, JOSEPH KREINS AND SEAN KENNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LISA MOORE and EUGENE MOORE, 

Individually and as Co-Successors in 

Interest of Decedent JEREMIAH 

EUGENE MOORE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF VALLEJO, a public entity; 

CITY OF VALLEJO POLICE CHIEF 

JOSEPH KREINS, in his individual and 

official capacities; OFFICER SEAN 

KENNEY, individually; and DOES 1–50, 

individually, jointly and severally,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

RE: CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS

)

Case 2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN Document 36 Filed 09/03/15 Page 1 of 6
2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CONFID. DOCS. 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY ALL PARTIES to this action by and through their 

attorneys of record, that in order to protect the confidentiality of the records described below, any 

of said records disclosed are subject to a protective order (and designated as “Confidential 

Material”). Defendants have designated the following documents, in paragraphs (a)–(y), as 

confidential. Plaintiffs do not agree that all of the documents are confidential, and Plaintiffs 

reserve their right to challenge the confidentiality designations, including by proceeding under 

paragraph 7 of this stipulated protective order:

a. Documents subpoenaed from third parties, including, but not limited to:

i. San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office Forensic Laboratory Documents;

ii. Solano County Sheriff-Coroner’s Documents, including but not limited 

to, x-rays and autopsy photographs;

iii. Solano County District Attorney’s Office Documents;

iv. Hayward Police Department Documents pertaining to Sean Kenney; 

v. Napa City Police Department Documents pertaining to Sean Kenney;

b. VPD Report No. 12-13203

c. CD of 21 digital photos of Ofc. Kenney's weapon. See Report No. 1213203.8

d. DVD of 505 Digital Photos of Crime Scene. See Report No. 1213203.8

e. SB-69 Veripic digital photographs. See Evidence Property Management form,

Case No. 1213203, Sheet 16288

f. SB-71-Veripic Photos of Autopsy. See Evidence Property Management form, 

Case No. 1213203, Sheet 16309. 

g. SB79-CD of 21 Digital Photographs of Ofc. Kenney’s Weapon. See Evidence 

Property Management form, Case No. 1213203, Sheet 16430

h. SB80-DVD of 505 Digital Photos of Crime Scene. See Evidence Property 

Management form, Case No. 1213203, Sheet 16430

i. JJ2-DVD. See Evidence Property Management form, Case No. 1213203, Sheet 

16461

Case 2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN Document 36 Filed 09/03/15 Page 2 of 6
2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CONFID. DOCS. 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

j. VPD 12-13203 Lt Dejesus Vievu Video

k. VPD 12-13203 Sgt Clark Vievu Video

l. Officer Boyce’s digitally recorded interview. See Report No. 1213203.9

m. Officer Greenberg’s interview that was digitally recorded. See Report No. 

1213203.9

n. DVDs #1 and #2 of interviews with B. Clark. See Report No. 1213203.10; see 

also Report No. 1213203

o. DVD of interview with S. Kenney. See Report No. 1213203.10

p. DVD of interview with R. McMahon. See Report No. 1213203.10

q. DVD of interview with M. Clouse. See Report No. 1213203.10

r. DVD of interview with Jason Jessie. See Report No. 1213203.10

s. DVD of recordings made by M. Clouse. See Report No. 1213203.10

t. DVD of interviews with E. and L. Moore. See Report No. 1213203.10; see also

Report No. 1213203.17 

u. CD-R of phone conversation between S. Meeker and Tribble. See Report No. 

1213203.10

v. All of Clouse’s recordings from his Mino HD flip video device. See Report 

No. 1213203.10 

w. CD of interview with Hanson-McGrath. See Report No. 1213203.13

x. Two DVDs of Sgt. Clark’s interview. See Report No. 1213203

y. The CD-R containing the audio recording of Det. T. Tribble’s phone 

conversation with Sharon MEEKER on 10/22/12. See Report No. 1213203.17 

1. Confidential material may not be disclosed except as set forth in paragraphs 2–6.

2. Confidential Material may be disclosed only to the following persons:

a. Counsel for any party to this action.

Case 2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN Document 36 Filed 09/03/15 Page 3 of 6
2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CONFID. DOCS. 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

b. Paralegal, stenographic, clerical, investigative, and secretarial 

personnel regularly employed or retained by counsel referred to in 

4(a);

c. Independent court reporters and court personnel including 

stenographic reporters engaged in such proceedings as are 

necessarily incidental to preparation for the trial of this action;

d. Any outside expert or consultant retained in connection with this 

action, and not otherwise employed by either party;

e. Any “in house” expert designated by defendant to testify at trial in 

this matter;

f. Witnesses, other than the plaintiffs herein, who may have the 

documents disclosed to them during deposition proceedings; the 

witnesses may not leave the depositions with copies of the 

documents, and shall be bound by the provisions of paragraph 5;

g. Any Neutral Evaluator or other designated ADR provider; 

h. Parties to this action; and

i. The jury, should this matter go to trial.

3. Each person to whom disclosure is made, with the exception of counsel who are 

presumed to know of the contents of this protective order, shall, prior to disclosure: (1) be 

provided with a copy of this order by the person furnishing him/her such material, and (2) agree 

on the record or in writing that she/he has read the protective order and that she/he understands the 

provisions of the protective order. Such person must also consent to be subject to the jurisdiction 

of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, with respect to any proceeding 

relating to the enforcement of this order. Defendants City of Vallejo and the named defendants 

herein shall be entitled to retain possession of the original writings described above. Nothing in 

this paragraph 4 is intended to prevent officials or employees of the City of Vallejo or other 

authorized government officials or any other persons from having access to the documents if they 

Case 2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN Document 36 Filed 09/03/15 Page 4 of 6
2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CONFID. DOCS. 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

would have had access in the normal course of their job duties or rights as a citizen. Further, 

nothing in this order prevents a witness from disclosing events or activities personal to them, i.e., a 

witness can disclose to others previous information given to the City of Vallejo with respect to 

what she/he saw, heard, or otherwise sensed.

4. At the conclusion of the trial and of any appeal or upon other termination of this 

litigation, upon written request by the City of Vallejo, all Confidential Material received under the 

provision of this order (including any copies made) shall be delivered back to the City of Vallejo. 

Provisions of this order insofar as they restrict disclosure and use of the material shall be in effect 

until all Confidential Material (including all copies thereof) are returned to defendants. 

Notwithstanding this provision, plaintiffs’ counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all 

pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, 

even if such materials contain Confidential Material.

5. In the event that any party wishes to file Confidential Material with the court, as an 

exhibit to a pleading or otherwise, the filing party shall first seek an order to file under seal 

pursuant to Local Rule 141. The Request to Seal Documents shall refer to this stipulation and 

protective order.

6. Nothing in this order shall preclude a party from showing or disclosing any 

documents, e.g., deposition transcript, pleading or brief, which otherwise contain Confidential 

Material as defined in paragraph 1, as long as such document has been redacted so as to prevent 

disclosure of such Confidential Material.

7. The foregoing is without prejudice to the right of any party (a) to apply to the Court 

for a further protective order relating to any Confidential Material or relating to discovery in this 

litigation; (b) to apply to the Court for an order removing the Confidential Material designation 

from any document; and (c) to apply to the Court for an order compelling production of 

documents or modification of this order or for any order permitting disclosure of Confidential 

Materials beyond the terms of this order.

/ /

Case 2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN Document 36 Filed 09/03/15 Page 5 of 6
2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CONFID. DOCS. 5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: September 1, 2015 /s/ Furah Z. Faruqui 

FURAH Z. FARUQUI

Deputy City Attorney

Attorney for Defendants,

CITY OF VALLEJO, JOSEPH KREINS, SEAN 

KENNEY

DATED: September 1, 2015 /s/ T. Kennedy Helm

T. KENNEDY HELM

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LISA MOORE and EUGENE MOORE

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 2, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-00656-JAM-KJN Document 36 Filed 09/03/15 Page 6 of 6