Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-00647/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-00647-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

1

underlying the present motion.

Plaintiffs waited over two weeks after receiving Defendant’s expert disclosures to file 2

this motion. A briefing schedule that allows Plaintiffs to file a reply less than 2 office hours before the

hearing is patently unreasonable.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ARTHUR G. MAIONCHI, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION,

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 03-0647 JF PVT

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND

HEARING SCHEDULE FOR

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE

EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY 

On July 2, 2007, the parties filed a stipulated request for an order shortening time for hearing

on Plaintiffs’ motion to exclude the testimony of experts Plaintiffs argue were not timely disclosed.1

Based on the stipulation and the file herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall electronically file its opposition papers no

later than NOON on July 6, 2007. No reply may be filed. The motion shall be heard at 10:00 a.m. 2

on July 10, 2007.

Dated: 7/3/07

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:03-cv-00647-JF Document 99 Filed 07/03/07 Page 1 of 1