Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05150/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05150-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY T. CRIADO, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF )

 CORRECTIONS, et al., )

)

Defendants )

____________________________________)

1:04 CV 5150 AWI SMS P

ORDER VACATING 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 TRIAL

DATE

Plaintiff brings this civil rights action against correctional officials for violations

of his civil rights. Trial in this action had been set for September 12, 2006. The court finds it

necessary to move this trial due to another, lower number case, also needing to go to trial on this

date. Because of the court’s limited openings for trial and the schedules of the parties and

counsel, the court sets an October 2, 2006 telephonic hearing to address a new date for trial.

In addition, a review of the record reveals that Defendants’ motions in limine

may significantly impact the evidence the parties present at trial. However, a review of the

record also reveals that Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to Defendants’ motions in limine. 

At the October 2, 2006 hearing, the court will discuss with the parties the possibility of ruling on

Defendants’ motions prior to trial.

 

Case 1:04-cv-05150-AWI -SMS Document 66 Filed 09/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Accordingly, the court ORDERS that:

1. The trial currently set for September 12, 2006 is VACATED;

2. The transportation writ ordering the attendance of Plaintiff at trial on

September 12, 2006 is VACATED;

3. A Telephonic Hearing is set for October 2, 2006 at 3:30 p.m. to determine

a new trial date and to address the possibility of addressing Defendants’

motions in limine prior to trial;

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to fax a copy of this order to the

Litigation Coordinator at Plaintiff’s place of incarceration. The Litigation

Coordinator is REQUESTED to prove a copy of this order to Plaintiff as

soon as possible.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 6, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05150-AWI -SMS Document 66 Filed 09/07/06 Page 2 of 2