Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-05711/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-05711-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

500690533v1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME 

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA State Bar No. 88500) 

john.grenfell@pillsburylaw.com 

JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA State Bar No. 209134) 

jake.sorensen@pillsburylaw.com 

FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice)

fusae.nara@pillsburylaw.com 

ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA State Bar No. 191479) 

andrew.lanphere@pillsburylaw.com 

50 Fremont Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 983-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SHARP CORPORATION and 

SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

Case No. 3:10-cv-05711 SI 

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants 

Case No. 3:10-cv-05212 SI 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants 

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI 

MDL No. 1827 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

ENLARGE TIME AND 

CONTINUING HEARING ON 

WASHINGTON’S MOTION TO 

REMAND 

[Civil L. R. 6-3] 

Case 3:10-cv-05711-SI Document 66 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

500690533v1 - 1 - [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME 

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI 

The Court having considered all papers filed in support of and in opposition to 

Defendants’ Motion to Enlarge Time (“Motion”), and good cause appearing, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as set forth below: 

 The State of Washington’s Motion to Remand, Dkt. No. 2233, shall be heard 

concurrently with the State of California’s Motion to Remand, Dkt. No. 2249, currently set 

for hearing on February 4, 2011. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ____________________, 2011 

 ______________________________ 

 Hon. Susan Illston 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

Case 3:10-cv-05711-SI Document 66 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 2