Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02211/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02211-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY RICHARD LOW,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2211 MCE DAD P

vs.

GARY R. STANTON, et al., ORDER

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 16, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Plaintiff has

filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and defendants have filed a reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:05-cv-02211-MCE -DAD Document 61 Filed 09/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 16, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants Von Ting, Childres, and Headley’s February 9, 2007 motion to

dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is granted;

3. Defendant Stanton’s February 9, 2007 motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule

12(b)(6) is granted;

4. The following claims are dismissed: due process claim concerning defendants

Von Ting and Childres’ denial of plaintiff’s inmate grievance; due process claim concerning

defendants Stanton and Headley’s failure to follow inmate grievance procedures; due process

claim concerning defendants Stanton, Childres, Von Ting, and Headley’s failure to overturn

disciplinary decisions and sentences; due process claim concerning defendant Stanton’s failure to

provide a proper appeals process to challenge disciplinary actions; and Fourteenth Amendment

claims against defendant Stanton concerning adequacy of law library services; and

5. This action shall proceed on all other claims.

Dated: September 20, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-02211-MCE -DAD Document 61 Filed 09/20/07 Page 2 of 2