Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05659/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05659-67/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

PL.’S & NON-PARTIES AMD & DIAMOND’S STIP. TO USE ITC DISCOVERY

LEGAL02/36367481v1 Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA

- 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Yitai Hu (SBN 248085) (yitai.hu@alston.com)

Ryan W. Koppelman (SBN 290704) (ryan.koppelman@alston.com)

Hsin-Yi (Cindy) Huang (SBN 215152) (cindy.huang@alston.com)

Samuel T. Lam (SBN 285135) (sam.lam@alston.com)

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1950 University Avenue, 5th Floor

East Palo Alto, CA 94303

Telephone: 650-838-2000

Facsimile: 650-838-2001

Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963) (elizabeth.rader@alston.com)

Jennifer (Celine) Liu (SBN 268990) (celine.liu@alston.com)

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

950 F Street NW

Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: 202-239-3008

Facsimile: 202-239-3333

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORP.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,

POWERCHIP TECHNOLOGY CORP.,

MAXCHIP ELECTRONICS CORP., SILICON

XTAL CORPORATION, AMANDA DAI, and

JACKY LEE,

Defendants.

No. C 09-05659 WHA

PLAINTIFF RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY

CORP.’S AND NON-PARTIES

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.’S

AND BEST DATA PRODUCTS D/B/A

DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA, INC.’S

STIPULATED REQUEST TO ALLOW

USE OF ITC DISCOVERY

Order re: Order re:

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 496 Filed 05/10/16 Page 1 of 5
PL.’S & NON-PARTIES AMD & DIAMOND’S STIP. TO USE ITC DISCOVERY

LEGAL02/36367481v1 Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA

- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Richtek Technology Corporation and non-parties

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”) and Best Data Products d/b/a Diamond Multimedia, Inc.

(“Diamond”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby jointly submit the following

Stipulation in the above-entitled action:

WHEREAS, AMD and Diamond produced to Richtek certain documents in the related ITC

Investigation No. 337-TA-698, Certain DC-DC Controllers and Products Containing the Same (the

“ITC Proceedings”);

WHEREAS, on March 31, 2016, Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler ordered that “[a]ll discovery

that Richtek and uPI produced in the related ITC investigation will be treated as if it were produced in

this lawsuit, protected by a similar protective order” (Dkt. No. 473 at 4);

WHEREAS, Richtek has requested AMD’s and Diamond’s consent to treat discovery produced

by AMD and Diamond in the ITC Proceedings as if it were produced in the instant lawsuit, protected by

the Protective Order in this case; and

WHEREAS, AMD and Diamond do not object to the use in this case of documents that AMD

and Diamond produced in the ITC proceedings, provided that documents designated as containing

Confidential Business Information in the ITC Proceedings are designated as “Highly Confidential –

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the Protective Order in this case, and documents designated as containing

Highly Sensitive Information in the ITC Proceedings are designed as “Highly Confidential – Source

Code” under the Protective Order in this case;

NOW, THEREFORE, AMD, Diamond, and Richtek jointly request that all discovery that

AMD and Diamond produced in the ITC Proceedings be treated as if it were produced in this lawsuit,

provided that documents designated as containing Confidential Business Information in the ITC

Proceedings are designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the Protective Order

in this case, and documents designated as containing Highly Sensitive Information in the ITC

Proceedings are designed as “Highly Confidential – Source Code” under the Protective Order in this

case.

Order re:

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 496 Filed 05/10/16 Page 2 of 5
PL.’S & NON-PARTIES AMD & DIAMOND’S STIP. TO USE ITC DISCOVERY

LEGAL02/36367481v1 Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA

- 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: May 9, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

By: /s/Samuel T. Lam

Yitai Hu (SBN 248085)

yitai.hu@alston.com

Ryan W. Koppelman (SBN 290704)

ryan.koppelman@alston.com

Samuel T. Lam (SBN 285135)

sam.lam@alston.com

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1950 University Ave., 5th Floor

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2282

Tel: (650) 838-2000

Fax: (650) 838-2001

Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 183963)

elizabeth.rader@alston.com

Jennifer (Celine) Liu (SBN 268990)

(celine.liu@alston.com)

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

950 F Street

Washington, D.C. 20004

Tel: (202) 239-3008

Fax: (202) 239-3333

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORP.

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/Vision L. Winter

Vision L. Winter (SBN 234172)

vwinter@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

400 South Hope Street, 18th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Tel: (213) 430-6000

Fax: (213) 430-6407

Darin W. Snyder (SBN 136003)

dsnyder@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Tel: (415) 984-8700

Fax: (415) 984-8701

Order re:

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 496 Filed 05/10/16 Page 3 of 5
PL.’S & NON-PARTIES AMD & DIAMOND’S STIP. TO USE ITC DISCOVERY

LEGAL02/36367481v1 Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA

- 4 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Attorneys for Non-Party

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. and BEST DATA

PRODUCTS D/B/A DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA, INC.

Order re:

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 496 Filed 05/10/16 Page 4 of 5
PL.’S & NON-PARTIES AMD & DIAMOND’S STIP. TO USE ITC DISCOVERY

LEGAL02/36367481v1 Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA

- 5 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Samuel T. Lam, attest that

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

/s/Samuel T. Lam

Samuel T. Lam

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________, 2016 ___________________________________

United States District Judge

May 10 Order re:

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 496 Filed 05/10/16 Page 5 of 5