Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03342/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03342-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -1- 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Change Time Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 

 (Case No. C09-03342 JF (PVT)) 

KENNETH B. WILSON (SBN 130009) 

kwilson@carrferrell.com 

CHRISTOPHER P. GREWE (SBN 245938) 

cgrewe@carrferrell.com 

CARR & FERRELL LLP

2200 Geng Road 

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 812-3400 

Facsimile: (650) 812-3444 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant 

MOBILE STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

CHARLES S. BARQUIST (CA SBN 133785) 

CBarquist@mofo.com 

HECTOR G. GALLEGOS (CA SBN 175137) 

HGallegos@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3500 

Los Angeles, California 90013 

Telephone: (213) 892-5200 

Facsimile: (213) 892-5454 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs 

FUJITSU COMPUTER PRODUCTS OF AMERICA, INC. 

and FUJITSU AMERICA, INC.

and Defendant FUJITSU LIMITED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MOBILE STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

FUJITSU LTD., et al., 

 Defendants. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

CASE NO. C09-03342 JF (PVT) 

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

CHANGE TIME PURSUANT 

TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

**E-Filed 4/28/2010**

-------------------

, AS MODIFIED BY

THE COURT

Case 5:09-cv-03342-JF Document 56 Filed 04/28/10 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -2- 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Change Time Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 

 (Case No. C09-03342 JF (PVT)) 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, plaintiff Mobile Storage Technology, Inc. (“MST”) and 

defendants Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu Computer Products of America, Inc. and Fujitsu America, Inc. 

(collectively, “Fujitsu”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows: to and request an order staying the 

litigation, including all hearings and the filings, exchanges, briefings, and/or hearings provided for 

under the Patent Local Rules and the service of and/or response to any discovery served by any 

party, for approximately six weeks. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(1), the Parties set forth the reasons 

for this request as follows: 

On March 31, 2010, MST and Fujitsu participated in a court-ordered mediation pursuant to 

ADR Local Rule 6, before the court-appointed mediator, Daniel Bergeson. 

 During the March 31 mediation, the Parties and the mediator concluded that settlement of 

this action would be facilitated significantly by continuing the mediation for approximately thirty 

days, by staying the deadlines in the litigation during that period, and by continuing certain dates by 

roughly thirty days as well. Accordingly, Parties stipulated and agreed to extend the certain claim 

construction deadlines to facilitate the continuation of mediation discussions pursuant to Civil L.R. 

6-2 (DOCKET NO. 48); and the Court granted that extension (DOCKET NO. 52).

 The mediation efforts are continuing, and the Parties and the mediator continue to believe 

that settlement of this action would be facilitated significantly by continuing the mediation for 

approximately six weeks, by staying the deadlines in the litigation during that period, and by 

continuing certain dates by up to six weeks as well. This additional time is needed to allow for 

rescheduling of the mediation session, which requires advance planning due to the need for 

representatives of Defendant Fujitsu Limited to travel from Japan and the need for the 

representative of Defendants Fujitsu America and Fujitsu Computer Products of America to 

recuperate from surgery scheduled for May 10. 

 The Parties and the mediator believe that to proceed with litigation activities over the next 

six weeks and to meet the claim construction deadlines as currently scheduled would undercut the 

parties’ settlement efforts and could well prove to be a waste of the Court’s and the parties’ time 

and resources. 

Case 5:09-cv-03342-JF Document 56 Filed 04/28/10 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -3- 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Change Time Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 

 (Case No. C09-03342 JF (PVT)) 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that except for the ongoing mediation 

efforts and as expressly set forth below, all activities in this action shall be stayed for six weeks, 

and that certain pre-trial and claim construction deadlines should be rescheduled as follows: 

Event Current Schedule Proposed Schedule 

Case Management Conference April 30, 2010 June 11, 2010 

Hearing on Fujitsu's Motion for Leave to 

Amend Invalidity Contentions April 30, 2010 June 11, 2010 

Pat. L.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction Stmt May 21, 2010 June 30, 2010 

Deadline to Complete Claim Construction 

Discovery June 9, 2010 July 21, 2010 

MST to file and serve Opening Brief 

(Pat. L.R. 4-5(a)) June 30, 2010 August 11, 2010 

Fujitsu to file and serve Responsive Brief 

(Pat. L.R. 4-5(b)) July 14, 1010 August 25, 2010 

MST to file and serve Reply Brief 

(Pat. L.R. 4-5(c)) July 21, 2010 September 1, 2010 

Claim Construction Tutorial August 2, 2010 

at 9 am 

September 13, 2010 

at 9 am 

Claim Construction Hearing August 9, 2010 

at 9 am 

September 20, 2010 

at 9 am 

Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions January 21, 2011 February 22, 2011 

---

17

---

17

Case 5:09-cv-03342-JF Document 56 Filed 04/28/10 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -4- 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Change Time Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 

 (Case No. C09-03342 JF (PVT)) 

Dated: April 27, 2010 CARR & FERRELL LLP

By:

KENNETH B. WILSON 

CHRISTOPHER P. GREWE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant 

MOBILE STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

Dated: April 27, 2010 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By:

CHARLES S. BARQUIST 

HECTOR G. GALLEGOS 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs 

FUJITSU COMPUTER PRODUCTS OF 

AMERICA, INC. and FUJITSU AMERICA, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April ____, 2010 

THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL 

United States District Judge 

 /s/ Christopher P. Grewe

 /s/ Charles S. Barquist

28

Case 5:09-cv-03342-JF Document 56 Filed 04/28/10 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -5- 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Change Time Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 

 (Case No. C09-03342 JF (PVT)) 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained the 

concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated 

by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support 

this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon 

request.

Dated: April 27, 2010 

CHRISTOPHER P. GREWE 

/s/ Christopher P. Grewe

Case 5:09-cv-03342-JF Document 56 Filed 04/28/10 Page 5 of 5