Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228-53/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1 

5:13-cv-00228-RMW 

ORDER REGARDING PAPERS FILED AFTER SUMMARY JUDGMENT DEADLINES 

RS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ADIL HIRAMANEK, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

L. MICHAEL CLARK, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 5:13-cv-00228-RMW 

ORDER REGARDING PAPERS FILED 

AFTER SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

DEADLINES 

On February 5, 2016, this court held a hearing on cross-motions for summary judgment in 

this matter that were filed on December 30 and 31, 2015. Dkt. Nos. 430, 435, 436, 438. Since 

February 5, 2016, plaintiff Adil Hiramanek has filed, among other papers, at least three 

“declarations” or “requests for judicial notice” that purport to be in support of plaintiffs’ motion 

for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 494, 501, 502. The January 21, 2016 deadline for replies in 

support of summary judgment passed weeks ago. The court will not consider untimely filings 

regarding the parties’ summary judgment motions. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(d). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 12, 2016 

______________________________________ 

Ronald M. Whyte 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:13-cv-00228-JD Document 505 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 1