Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04828/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04828-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

01980.00029/6675803.1 1 

Stipulation and [Proposed] 

Order of Dismissal

Case No. 3:14-cv-04828-SI 

HARRINGTON, FOXX, DUBROW & CANTER, 

LLP 

GREGORY J. SOWDER (196158) 

Montgomery Street, Suite 1100 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone (415) 288-6600 

Facsimile (415) 288-6618 

Email: gjsowder@hfdclaw.com 

WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & 

ADRIAN, LLP

SCOTT M. DANIELS

1250 Connecticut Avenue N.W., Suite 700

Washington, D.C. 20036-2657 

Telephone (202) 822-1100 

Facsimile (202) 822-1111 

Email: sdaniels@whda.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PRICEPLAY.COM, INC. 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP

DAVID A. PERLSON (209502) 

davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com

MICHELLE A. CLARK (243777)

michelleclark@quinnemanuel.com

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-4788 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

ROBERT B. WILSON

robertwilson@quinnemanuel.com

51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor

New York, NY 10010-1601 

Telephone: (212) 849-7000 

Facsimile: (212) 849-7000 

Attorneys for Defendant

GOOGLE INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PRICEPLAY.COM, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:14-cv-04828-SI 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal 

re U.S. Patent Nos. 8,050,982 and 8,494,917 

Case 3:14-cv-04828-SI Document 60 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

01980.00029/6675803.1 2 

Stipulation and [Proposed] 

Order of Dismissal

3:14-cv-04830-SI 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Priceplay.com, Inc. (“Priceplay”) filed an Amended Complaint on 

June 27, 2014 (ECF No. 10) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,050,982, (“’982 Patent”) 

and U.S. Patent No. 8,494,917 (“’917 Patent”) (together “Patents-in-Suit”);

WHEREAS, Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) filed its Answer to the Amended Complaint 

on July 29, 2014 (ECF No. 24) asserting, inter alia, an affirmative defense that the Patents-in-Suit 

are invalid; 

WHEREAS, on March 18, 2015, following briefing and oral argument, the Honorable 

Richard G. Andrews of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in Priceplay.com Inc. v. 

AOL Advertising, Inc., Case No. 1:14-cv-00092-RGA (“AOL Action”) (ECF Nos. 49 & 50) issued 

an order finding all claims of the ’982 patent and the ’917 patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as 

being directed toward patent-ineligible subject matter; 

WHEREAS, Priceplay has filed a Notice of Appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit (ECF No. 52 in the AOL Action); 

WHEREAS, in the interests of judicial economy and efficiency, and to avoid the need for 

multiple courts to decide overlapping legal and factual issues, the parties to the present action seek 

to enter a stipulated order of dismissal and final judgment regarding all claims asserted by PricePlay 

in accordance with Judge Andrews’s order such that the present case and the AOL Action may be 

heard by the Federal Circuit at the same time; 

NOW, THEREFORE, Priceplay and Google, by and through their respective counsel of 

record, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court order the following: 

1. The Court hereby adopts Judge Andrews’s order of March 18, 2015 granting AOL’s 

Motion to Dismiss in Priceplay.com Inc. v. AOL Advertising, Inc., Case No. 1:14-cv-00092-RGA, 

for purposes of entering a final and appealable dismissal and judgment. Based on Judge Andrews’s 

order, all claims of the ’982 and ’917 patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. All briefing and 

arguments relating to AOL’s Motion to Dismiss in the AOL Action shall be deemed to be part of the 

record in the present action. 

Case 3:14-cv-04828-SI Document 60 Filed 05/05/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

01980.00029/6675803.1 3 

Stipulation and [Proposed] 

Order of Dismissal

3:14-cv-04830-SI 

2. Nothing in this stipulated dismissal order shall be construed as an admission by 

Priceplay as to the correctness of Judge Andrews’s order in the AOL Action, or diminishing 

Priceplay’s rights of appeal.

3. All claims by Priceplay against Google in this action are dismissed. 

4. This order shall constitute a final and appealable order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 30, 2015 HARRINGTON, FOXX, DUBROW & 

CANTER, LLP 

/s/ 

Gregory J. Sower

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PRICEPLAY.COM, INC.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN LLP

/s/ 

Michelle A. Clark

Attorneys for Defendant

Google INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:________________________ ________________________ 

 United States District Judge 

5/1/15

Case 3:14-cv-04828-SI Document 60 Filed 05/05/15 Page 3 of 3