Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01141/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01141-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gordon & Rees LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

(CASE NO C 05 01141 BZ)

ANDREW D. CASTRICONE (SBN: 154607)

AMY MACLEAR (SBN: 215638)

GORDON & REES LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 986-5900

Facsimile: (415) 986-8054

Attorneys For: Defendants

DOREEN CHIU, FRANK CHIU, and DAVID CHAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT I. HANFLING, CHAPTER 7 

TRUSTEE FOR ATG, INC.,

Plaintiff

vs.

DOREEN CHIU, FRANK CHIU, GEORGE 

DOUBLEDAY, DAVID CHAN, EDWARD 

VINECOUR, RIO CHAO, DAVID R. 

SEBASTIAN, JAMES E. THOMAS, DENNIS

WILLIAMSON, ERIC C. SU, FRED 

FEIZOLLAHI, and WILLIMA HEWITT,

Defendants.

/

CASE NO. C 05-01141 BZ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Date Action Filed: March 21, 2005

WHEREAS Plaintiff ROBERT I. HANFLING, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR ATG, 

INC. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against DOREEN CHIU, FRANK CHIU, and DAVID

CHAN (collectively, “Defendants”).

WHEREAS DAVID CHAN was served with the Complaint on July 14, 2005. Pursuant 

to Rule 12(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Mr. Chan’s response is due on August

3, 2005. Plaintiff served Mr. and Mrs. Chiu on July 15, 2005. Their response is due on August

4, 2005.

WHEREAS counsel for the above-referenced parties stipulated to extend the time for

Defendants to file a response to the Complaint which extends through and includes October 3, 

CG\1016744\809083.1

Case 3:05-cv-01141-BZ Document 19 Filed 08/02/2005 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:05-cv-01141-MMC Document 20 Filed 08/03/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gordon & Rees LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

(CASE NO C 05 01141 BZ)

2005. The extension will enable Defendants to resolve various insurance coverage and

representation issues, as well as permit Plaintiff to complete service on the other Defendants.

WHEREAS Civil L.R. 6-1(b) provides that the written stipulation requires a Court order 

because the extension will alter the initial disclosure deadlines and other preliminary deadlines

previously set by the Court’s Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference (the deadline 

for initial disclosures was July 25, 2005and the First Case Management Conference is scheduled

for August 1, 2005).

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the time for Defendants to file their answers to the 

Complaint is extended through and includes October 3, 2005. Following execution of this 

Stipulation, counsel for Defendants shall promptly file it with the Court pursuant to Civil L.R. 5. 

Dated: August 2, 2005 GORDON & REES LLP

 /s/ Amy Maclear

By:

AMY MACLEAR

Attorneys For Defendants

DOREEN CHIU, FRANK CHIU, and DAVID

CHAN

Dated: August 1, 2005 JACOBS PARTNERS LLC

 /s/ Robert M. Fleischer

By:

ROBERT M. FLEISCHER

Attorneys For Plaintiff

ROBERT I. HANFLING, CHAPTER 7 

TRUSTEE

Case 3:05-cv-01141-BZ Document 19 Filed 08/02/2005 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:05-cv-01141-MMC Document 20 Filed 08/03/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gordon & Rees LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants may file a response to the Complaint on or 

before October 3, 2005. Defendants’ written consent to Magistrate Judge Zimmerman’s

jurisdiction or alternatively, written request for reassignment to a district judge will accompany

the responsive pleading.

______________________________

Case 3:05-cv-01141-BZ Document 19 Filed 08/02/2005 Page 3 of 3

August 3, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 3:05-cv-01141-MMC Document 20 Filed 08/03/05 Page 3 of 3