Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01748/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01748-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RASHAWN GREEN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1748 DFL JFM PS

vs.

SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPUTY BRADFORD,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed September 20, 2005, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms which are required to effect service on

the defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any

way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Case 2:05-cv-01748-DFL -JFM Document 6 Filed 11/03/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 2, 2005. 

001; green1748.fus

Case 2:05-cv-01748-DFL -JFM Document 6 Filed 11/03/05 Page 2 of 2