Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00466/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00466-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26:7401 IRS: Tax Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff and its counsel failed to comply with the 1

Status Report filing deadline stated in the Order Setting Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference filed March 9, 2007. Sanctions

for such a failure could be imposed in the future.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) 2:07-cv-466-GEB-DAD

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

v. ) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

) CONFERENCE; FEDERAL RULE OF

MARGARET REMEDIOS; ROBERT HOGUE ) CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(m) NOTICE

as trustee of the Sicnarf Trust; )

STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX )

BOARD; and BANK OF AMERICA )

NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS )

ASSOCIATION, )

)

Defendants. )

)

Since Plaintiff’s status report filed May 23, 2007 reveals

that not all Defendants have been served, the Status (Pretrial

Scheduling) Conference currently scheduled for June 4, 2007, is

continued to August 13, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report 1

shall be filed no later than fourteen days prior to the scheduling

Case 2:07-cv-00466-GEB-DAD Document 7 Filed 05/24/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The failure of one or more of the parties to 2

participate in the preparation of the joint status report does

not excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file

a status report in accordance with this Order. In the event a

party fails to participate as ordered, the party timely

submitting the status report shall include a declaration

explaining why it was unable to obtain the cooperation of the

other party or parties.

2

conference.2

Further, notice is hereby given under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 4(m) that any unserved Defendants could be dismissed if

Plaintiff fails to show good cause for not having served those

Defendants “within 120 days after the filing of the complaint.” Fed.

R. Civ. P. 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-00466-GEB-DAD Document 7 Filed 05/24/07 Page 2 of 2