Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-05192/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-05192-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY BUFORD, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

WASCO STATE PRISON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:01-cv-05192-REC-SMS-P 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDING AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

(Docs. 106 and 121)

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO

FILE RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

Plaintiff Timothy Buford (“plaintiff”), a prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On September 8, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Case 1:01-cv-05192-SMS Document 132 Filed 11/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 8,

2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed May 20, 2005, is

DENIED, without prejudice; and

3. Defendants shall file a response to plaintiff’s second

amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of

service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 1, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:01-cv-05192-SMS Document 132 Filed 11/02/05 Page 2 of 2