Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01531/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01531-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCHEA JACKSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1531 LKK EFB P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, Warden, 

et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action

filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed September 13, 2006, plaintiff’s complaint was

dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. On September 22, 2006, plaintiff filed an

amended complaint, on which the court is now proceeding. On October 13, 2006, plaintiff filed

another amended complaint, without leave of court to do so. 

On October 16, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. By

court order filed November 2, 2005, the court granted plaintiff’s August 3, 2005, application to

proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff’s latest motion to proceed in forma pauperis will therefore

be denied as moot. 

By court order filed September 13, 2006, the court admonished plaintiff not to file

anything further in this action except an amended complaint until further order of the court. The

Case 2:05-cv-01531-LKK -EFB Document 126 Filed 11/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

court has not ordered plaintiff to file any other documents, and will caution plaintiff further to

refrain from filing anything more in this action unless directed to do so. A failure on plaintiff’s

part to do so will result in a recommendation that is action be dismissed.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed October 13, 2006, shall be disregarded;

2. Plaintiff’s October 16, 2006, motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as

moot; 

3. Plaintiff shall file nothing further in this action until further order of the court. 

Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Dated: November 1, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-01531-LKK -EFB Document 126 Filed 11/02/06 Page 2 of 2