Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00264/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00264-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN MCCLINTOCK,

Plaintiff,

v.

COLOSIMO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-0264 TLN DAD P

ORDER

On October 28, 2014, this court denied as moot plaintiff’s motion to stay these 

proceedings pending his interlocutory appeal because the Ninth Circuit had dismissed that appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction. Shortly thereafter, plaintiff filed the motion for reconsideration now 

pending before this court. In the motion, plaintiff contends that he timely filed a motion for 

reconsideration with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 

The court will deny plaintiff’s pending motion for reconsideration as also having been 

rendered moot. On January 6, 2015, the Ninth Circuit denied plaintiff’s motion for 

reconsideration filed in that court. In addition, the Ninth Circuit informed plaintiff that it would 

not entertain any further filings from him in that closed case.

Finally, once more the court will order plaintiff to file an opposition to defendants’ 

pending motion for summary judgment based on plaintiff’s alleged failure to exhaust 

administrative remedies prior to filing suit as required. The court will not tolerate further delay in 

Case 2:13-cv-00264-TLN-DB Document 45 Filed 01/08/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

this regard and plaintiff is forewarned that any failure on his part to file an opposition to 

defendants’ motion for summary judgment in compliance with this order will result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 44) is denied as moot; and

2. Within twenty-one days of the date of service of this order plaintiff shall file an 

opposition to defendants’ pending motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s failure to file an 

opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation 

that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Dated: January 8, 2015

DAD:9

mccl0264.motr

Case 2:13-cv-00264-TLN-DB Document 45 Filed 01/08/15 Page 2 of 2