Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01360/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01360-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND ORDER - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JAMES K. WARD, ESQ. (SBN 117639) 

DANIEL P. JAY, ESQ. (SBN 215860) 

EVANS, WIECKOWSKI & WARD, LLP 

745 University Avenue 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Telephone: (916)923-1600 

Facsimile: (916)923-1616 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TWAIN HARTE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 

PUBLIC ENTITY-FILING FEE WAIVED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

YVONNE HILTON , 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TWAIN HARTE COMMUNITY 

SERVICES DISTRICT, and DOES ONE 

THROUGH TWENTY, Inclusive, 

 Defendants, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 1:12-CV-01360-SMS 

STIPULATION AND DECLARATION; 

ORDER RE: EXPERT DISCOVERY 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff, YVONNE HILTON, by and through her 

attorneys, and Defendant, TWAIN HARTE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, by and 

through its attorneys, that the initial expert disclosure deadline of June 20, 2014 be continued to 

June 27, 2014; that the rebuttal expert disclosure deadline of July 3, 2014 be continued to July 

10, 2014; and that the expert discovery deadline of August 1, 2014 be continued to August 8, 

2014. 

The parties submit that good cause exists to continue the dates set forth above because it 

will allow the parties to avoid the expense of retaining experts and finalizing expert reports until 

Case 1:12-cv-01360-SMS Document 53 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND ORDER - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the Court issues its decision on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment / adjudication and 

because the Court’s decision on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment will likely determine 

whether certain experts are even necessary. Because the Court’s decision on Defendant’s motion 

for summary judgment will likely frame the necessary experts, the parties request that the dates 

discussed above be continued even if the Court issues its decision on the motion for summary 

judgment before June 20, 2014 (i.e. the current expert disclosure deadline). 

Further, good cause exists to continue the expert discovery dates because an amendment 

to the scheduling order will cause no prejudice to either party since both parties have agreed to 

the continuance; and because the adjustment of the discovery cutoff will not affect the other 

dates set by this Court and the trial date will not need to be continued. 

Thus, the parties to this case have stipulated to continue the expert discovery dates as set 

forth above. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 18, 2014 EVANS, WIECKOWSKI & WARD, LLP 

 /s/ Daniel Jay 

 ___________________________________ 

 JAMES K. WARD 

 DANIEL JAY 

 Attorneys for Defendant TWAIN HARTE 

 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 

Dated: June 18, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD N. KOSS 

 

 /s/ Richard N. Koss 

 ___________________________________ 

 RICHARD N. KOSS 

 Attorney for Plaintiff YVONNE HILTON 

 

Case 1:12-cv-01360-SMS Document 53 Filed 06/18/14 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND ORDER - 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DANIEL JAY

 I, Daniel Jay, do hereby declare and say the following: 

 1. I am one of the attorneys of record for Defendant in the above-entitled action. I 

have prepared this Declaration as evidence in support of the parties’ stipulation and request to 

this Court to continue the expert discovery cutoff and related dates. The facts stated in the 

stipulation set forth above are true and correct and based upon my personal knowledge. 

 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that 

the facts stated above in the stipulation of the parties is true and correct. This Declaration was 

executed on June 18, 2014 in Sacramento, California. 

 /s/ Daniel Jay 

 _____________________________ 

DECLARATION OF RICHARD KOSS 

I, Richard Koss, do hereby declare and say the following: 

 1. I am one of the attorneys of record for Plaintiff in the above-entitled action. I 

have prepared this Declaration as evidence in support of the parties’ stipulation and request to 

this Court to continue the expert discovery cutoff and related date. The facts stated in the 

stipulation set forth above are true and correct and based upon my personal knowledge. 

 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that 

the facts stated above in the stipulation of the parties is true and correct. This Declaration was 

executed on June 18, 2014 in Redwood City, California. 

 /s/ Richard Koss 

 _____________________________ 

Case 1:12-cv-01360-SMS Document 53 Filed 06/18/14 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND ORDER - 4 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 Based upon the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the Court orders that 

the initial expert disclosure deadline be extended to June 27, 2014; that the rebuttal expert 

disclosure deadline be extended to July 10, 2014; and that the expert discovery deadline be 

extended to August 8, 2014. All other deadlines set forth in the scheduling order shall remain 

unchanged. 

DATED: 6/18/2014 /s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

 

Case 1:12-cv-01360-SMS Document 53 Filed 06/18/14 Page 4 of 4