Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00201/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00201-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

00377766.WPD

PAMELA Y. PRICE, SBN 107713

P. BOBBY SHUKLA, SBN 229763

Price and Associates

1617 Clay Street

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-0292

Facsimile: (510) 452-5625

HOWARD MOORE, JR., SBN 55228

Moore and Moore

445 Bellevue Avenue, Second Floor

Oakland, California 94610-4924

Telephone: (510) 451-0104

Facsimile: (510) 451-5056

Email: MoorLaw@aol.com

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Elaine Stevenson

NANCY J. SHEEHAN, SBN 109419

RACHEL A. BOUMAN, SBN 214960

Porter, Scott, Weiberg & Delehant

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Post Office Box 255428

Sacramento, California 95865

Telephone: (916) 929-1481 

Facsimile: (916) 927-3706

Email: nsheehan@pswdlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants, County of Sacramento,

Craig Hill, and John McGinness

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELAINE STEVENSON, ) Case No.: CIV S 03-0201 MCE PAN

 )

Plaintiff, )

 ) STIPULATION TO CONFORM 

vs. ) TIME IN WHICH PARTIES MAY

 ) MOVE FOR AN AWARD OF

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CRAIG ) STATUTORY ATTORNEY’S FEES AND 

HILL, JOHN McGINNESS, and ) COST TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 54-293

DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, ) TO 30 DAYS AFTER ENTRY OF THE

) FINAL ORDER ON THE PENDING

Defendants. ) POST TRIAL MOTIONS &

____________________________________) (Proposed) ORDER 

WHEREAS on June 24, 2005, the jury returned its verdict in favor of Plaintiff and

against Defendant Hill and awarded compensatory and special damages;

Case 2:03-cv-00201-MCE -PAN Document 273 Filed 08/15/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

00377766.WPD

WHEREAS on July 6, 2005, the jury, in further proceedings to determine what, if any,

punitive damages, should be awarded against Defendant Hill, deadlocked, was thereafter

dismissed, and judgment entered;

WHEREAS on July 11, 2005, Defendants filed their Renewed Motion for Judgment as a

Matter of Law, Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, and for a New Trial;

WHEREAS on July 21, 2005, Plaintiff filed her post-judgment Motion to Alter or amend

a Judgment;

Whereas, Rule 54(d)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a motion for

an award of attorney’s fees and costs to be served and filed within 14 days of the entry of the

judgment “unless otherwise provided by statute or order of the court,” and Civil Local Rule 54-

293, provides that a party seeking an award of statutory attorney’s fees and cost may do so by

noticed motion within 30 days of the entry of judgment;

Whereas, conforming the time in which Plaintiff may move for an award of statutory

attorney’s fees and costs to comply with Civ. L. Rule 54-293, will avoid confusion, hasty

prepared pleadings, and will conserve the time of the Court and counsel: and

Whereas, Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Motion for

Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict; and for a New Trial, and Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or

Amend the Judgment are set for hearing on August 22, 2005,

Therefore, the parties to this civil action through their undersigned counsel of record

hereby stipulate and agree that all parties may have up to and including 30 days from entry of the

final order on all pending post-trial motions in which they may move for an award of statutory

attorney’s fees and costs.

MOORE AND MOORE

Attorney for Plaintiff Elaine Stevenson

Dated: July 25, 2005

/s/ Howard Moore, Jr.

By:________________________________

 HOWARD MOORE, JR.

Case 2:03-cv-00201-MCE -PAN Document 273 Filed 08/15/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

00377766.WPD

PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

Attorneys for Defendants, County of Sacramento,

Craig Hill, and John McGinness

Dated: July 26, 2005

\s\ Nancy J. Sheehan 

By: ___________________________

 NANCY J. SHEEHAN

ORDER

The above and foregoing stipulation read and considered,

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION: IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dared: August 12, 2005

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-00201-MCE -PAN Document 273 Filed 08/15/05 Page 3 of 3