Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02472/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02472-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONNELL KINNARD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2472 FCD PAN P

vs.

DAVID RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed March 11, 2005, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and sixty days

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Sixty days passed and plaintiff did not file an

amended complaint. On May 26, 2005, plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint

within ten days or his case would be dismissed without prejudice. That ten day period has now

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s

order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

Case 2:04-cv-02472-FCD-PAN Document 10 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 27, 2006. 

/001;kinn2472fta

Case 2:04-cv-02472-FCD-PAN Document 10 Filed 02/28/06 Page 2 of 2