Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04257/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04257-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE TO DECEMBER 1, 2006; [PROPOSED] ORDER

C06-04257 CRBı

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John M. Farrell (SBN 99649)

jfarrell@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

Redwood City, CA 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Attorneys for Defendant

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

SUBCAM, INC., a Florida corporation;

JAMES W. RAULSTON, an individual,; and

ROBERT C. SOLTYSIK, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP., a Georgia

corporation; COBRA TECHNOLOGIES

INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware

corporation; PIPELINE OBSERVATION

SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (POSM), an

unknown entity; ROBERT M. KATTER, an

individual; and R.S. TECHNICAL SERVICES,

INC. a California corporation,

Defendants.

C06-04257 CRB

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

THE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE TO DECEMBER 1, 2006;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs SUBCAM, INC., JAMES W. RAULSTON and ROBERT C.

SOLTYSIK (“Plaintiffs”) filed their Complaint on July 11, 2006. Defendant COBRA

TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (“COBRA”) was served with the Summons and Complaint

in this matter on or about September 1, 2006. Defendant COBRA responded to the Complaint on

October 20, 2006, filing a Motion to Dismiss or Strike.

Case 3:06-cv-04257-CRB Document 20 Filed 11/08/06 Page 1 of 3
2

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE TO DECEMBER 1, 2006; [PROPOSED] ORDER

C06-04257 CRBı

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREFORE, Defendants PIPELINE OBSERVATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT

(POSM), ROBERT M. KATTER and R.S. TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. (the “ POSM

Defendants”), were timely served with the Summons and Complaint. The POSM Defendants

responded to the Complaint on October 18, 2006, filing a Motion to Dismiss or Strike.

WHEREFORE, all defendants in this case except for COBRA TECHNOLOGIES

INTERNATIONAL, INC. have been served with the Summons and Complaint and have appeared.

WHEREFORE, by stipulation, the hearing on the Motions to Dismiss or Strike is

scheduled for December 1, 2006.

WHEREFORE, the parties jointly request to extend the Case Management Conference to

the same day as the hearing on the Motions to Dismiss or Strike as follows:

Action Current Deadline Stipulated Extension

Case Management

Conference

November 17, 2006 [Proposed: December 1, 2006]

WHEREFORE, this is the second modification in this case with respect to scheduling the

Case Management Conference.

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request the Court to adopt the above-stated

schedule.

Dated: November 3, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ John M. Farrell

John M. Farrell

Attorneys for Defendant

COBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Of Counsel:

Daniel A. Kent

Georgia Bar No. 415110

Noah C. Graubart

Georgia Bar No. 141862

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

1180 Peachtree Street, 21

st

Floor

Atlanta, GA 30309

Telephone: (404) 892-5005

Facsimile: (404) 892-5002

Case 3:06-cv-04257-CRB Document 20 Filed 11/08/06 Page 2 of 3
3

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE TO DECEMBER 1, 2006; [PROPOSED] ORDER

C06-04257 CRBı

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: November 3, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF HENRY HARMELING IV,

APC

By: /s/ Henry Harmeling IV

Henry Harmeling IV

Attorney for Plaintiffs

SUBCAM, INC., a Florida corporation, JAMES

W. RAULSTON, an individual, and ROBERT

C. SOLTYSIK, an individual

Dated: November 3, 2006 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

By: /s/ Deborah F. Sirias

Deborah F. Sirias

Attorneys for Defendants

PIPELINE OBSERVATION SYSTEM

MANAGEMENT, ROBERT M. KATTER and

R.S. TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45.X

I, John M. Farrell, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

obtained from each of the signatories.

Dated: November 3, 2006 By: /s/ John M. Farrell

John M. Farrell

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2006

Charles R. Breyer

United States District Court Judge

50381894.doc

November 6,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-04257-CRB Document 20 Filed 11/08/06 Page 3 of 3