Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01099/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01099-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Tort Claim

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEBORAH HENSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1099 FCD KJM

vs.

LASSEN COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

 By order filed April 10, 2007, the parties were directed, after fully meeting and

conferring regarding disputed items, to submit a supplemental joint statement pertaining to each

parties’ current position on disputed interrogatories and requests for production of documents. 

The parties were further directed to identify any interrogatories not responded to on the basis they

exceed fifty interrogatories. The supplemental joint statement does not comply with the court’s

order. What is very apparent from the pleadings is that the parties have not fully met and

conferred regarding the disputed discovery. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to compel further responses to interrogatories and

production of documents is denied.

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01099-FCD-KJM Document 155 Filed 05/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Within fifteen days from the date of this order, defendants shall provide

verifications for the supplemental responses defense counsel agreed to provide as set forth in

section II.C. of the supplemental joint statement.

DATED: May 22, 2007.

006

henson2.supp 

Case 2:05-cv-01099-FCD-KJM Document 155 Filed 05/23/07 Page 2 of 2