Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-254/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL No. 1917

Case No. C-07-5944-SC

ORDER DENYING INDIRECT 

PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS' 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

FILE UNDER SEAL

This Order Relates To:

ALL INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS

On April 15, 2014, the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs (the 

"IPPs") filed an administrative motion to file certain documents 

under seal, per Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(d). ECF No. 2536

("IPP Mot."). Rule 79-5(d) required the IPPs to move to file those 

documents under seal because some of the Philips Defendants 

designated them confidential under this case's protective order.

After the IPPs filed their motion, Rule 79-5(d) gave the Philips 

Defendants seven days to file either (1) a declaration establishing 

that the designated documents are properly sealable, along with a 

narrowly tailored proposed sealing order; or (2) a withdrawal of 

the confidentiality designation. The Philips Defendants filed 

nothing in response to the IPP Motion.

The Court therefore DENIES the IPP Motion. The Court STAYS

this Order for seven days after its signature date to allow the 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2558 Filed 04/30/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

Philips Defendants extra time to submit a declaration. If that 

date passes and the Philips Defendants have filed no responsive 

declaration, the IPPs are to file the documents in the public 

record per Local Rule 79-5(d).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2558 Filed 04/30/14 Page 2 of 2