Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00771/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00771-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT/SUMMARY ADJUDICATION DATE, TO RE SET DISPOSITIVE MOTION CUTOFF 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Herman Franck, Esq. (SB # 123476) 

Law Offices of Herman Franck 

1801 7th Street, Suite 150 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Tel. (916) 447-8400; Fax (916) 447-0720 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Kirsten Fisher, Haley Fisher, 

McKensey Fisher-Mathis 

David K. Huskey, Esq. 

Placer County Counsel’s Office 

175 Fulweiler Avenue 

Auburn, CA 95603 

Tel: (530) 889-4044 

Fax: (530) 889-4049 

Attorney for Defendants 

Placer County, Tracy Mae Alvarez, 

Antoinette Fabela, Kevin Henderson, 

Diane Rose, Greg Geisler 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KIRSTEN FISHER, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF Case No. 2:05-CV-00771-FCD-DAD 

AND AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR HER 

MINOR CHILDREN, HALEY FISHER, 

MCKENSEY FISHER-MATHIS, STIPULATION FOR ORDER 

 CONTINUING HEARING ON 

 MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

 JUDGMENT/SUMMARY 

 ADJUDICATION DATE, TO RE 

vs. SET DISPOSITIVE MOTION 

 CUTOFF 

 

 

PLACER COUNTY, TRACY MAE ALVAREZ, 

ANTOINETTE FABELA, KEVIN HENDERSON, 

DIANE ROSE, GREG GEISLER, 

 

 Defendants, 

_____________________________________________/ 

Case 2:05-cv-00771-FCD-DAD Document 40 Filed 05/01/06 Page 1 of 4
2

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT/SUMMARY ADJUDICATION DATE, TO RE SET DISPOSITIVE MOTION CUTOFF 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Plaintiff Kirsten Fisher on behalf of herself and as guardian ad litem for her minor children 

Haley Fisher and McKensey Fisher-Mathis and Defendants Placer County, Tracy Mae Alvarez, 

Antoinette Fabela, Kevin Henderson, Diane Rose, and Greg Geisler herewith submit this 

stipulation for an order continuing the hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary 

judgment/summary adjudication current set for May 19, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2 of 

the above entitled court, and to reset the dispositive motion cutoff date. 

Plaintiffs’ counsel recently received Defendants’ motion for summary judgment/summary 

adjudication set for May 19, 2006. Plaintiffs’ counsel notes that opposition papers would be due 

on May 2, 2006. This is not enough time for Plaintiffs to put together the opposition to this 

motion. 

Plaintiff Kirsten Fisher has some mental disabilities that make it difficult for her to react and get 

right on such a project. She will attend to it, but cannot do it quick enough with the present 

hearing date and opposition date. 

Plaintiffs’ counsel also has a scheduling conflict on May 19, 2006, as he will be in a Sacramento 

County Superior Court trial during that week. 

Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ counsel has asked Defendants’ counsel David Huskey, Esq. if he would 

agree to put the hearing date over, subject to the Court's Order thereon and a further order 

resetting the dispositive motion cutoff date presently set for May 19, 2006. 

Case 2:05-cv-00771-FCD-DAD Document 40 Filed 05/01/06 Page 2 of 4
3

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT/SUMMARY ADJUDICATION DATE, TO RE SET DISPOSITIVE MOTION CUTOFF 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Mr. Huskey does not oppose the request, and signs below to show his lack of opposition or 

objection to the request. 

SO STIPULATED: 

_____/s/____________ Dated: April 26, 2006 

Herman Franck, Esq. 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

______/s/___________ Dated: April 25, 2006 

David Huskey, Esq. 

Attorney for Defendants 

Case 2:05-cv-00771-FCD-DAD Document 40 Filed 05/01/06 Page 3 of 4
4

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT/SUMMARY ADJUDICATION DATE, TO RE SET DISPOSITIVE MOTION CUTOFF 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ORDER BASED ON STIPULATION 

 The Court accepts the foregoing stipulation of the parties and hereby ORDERS that the 

hearing date on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment/summary adjudication is continued 

to June 16, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2, and the dispositive motion cutoff date is similarly 

continued to June 16, 2006. All briefing on the motion shall comply with Local Rule 78-230. 

In light of the extensions granted above conflicts now exist with the court’s calendar and the 

remaining dates as set in this action. Accordingly, the following dates are hereby RESET: final 

pretrial conference is set for August 25, 2006 at 2:30 p.m. The joint pretrial statement shall be 

filed on August 18, 2006. The jury trial is set for November 7, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 

DATED: May 1, 2006 

 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-00771-FCD-DAD Document 40 Filed 05/01/06 Page 4 of 4