Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00691/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00691-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIE B. PENILTON, IV,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BENTON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00691-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 14)

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT/

ACTION (Doc. 13)

Plaintiff, Willie B. Penilton, IV (“plaintiff”), a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this

civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On March 1, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. 

Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations on

April 13, 2006. Based on the Objections, the Magistrate Judge

granted Plaintiff additional time to file an Amended Complaint

Case 1:05-cv-00691-OWW -GSA Document 17 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and informed Plaintiff that it would vacate the Findings and

Recommendations in the event Plaintiff ultimately complied. 

However, to date, Plaintiff has not submitted an Amended

Complaint. 

Accordingly, in accordance with the provisions of 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully

reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed March 1, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. The complaint, and therefore this action, is DISMISSED

pursuant to Local Rule 11-110, for plaintiff’s failure to obey

the court’s order of January 10, 2006, failure prosecute the

action, and failure to state a claim for relief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00691-OWW -GSA Document 17 Filed 06/27/06 Page 2 of 2