Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_11-cv-00411/USCOURTS-azd-4_11-cv-00411-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to

portions of the Report and Recommendation. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739

(7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). The Court

notes that Plaintiff requested clarification as to wrongful death damages; the request is granted to

the extent that the Court agrees with Plaintiff’s understanding of the Report and Recommendation.

See Doc. 132 at p. 2 (“Plaintiff understands the Report to mean that she and Gregory Harrelson may

recover wrongful death damages for the conduct alleged in Counts One, Two, and Five, as those

counts survived partial summary judgment because, taking the facts in the light most favorable to

the Plaintiff, there is a triable issue that the actions and inactions of the County, the Conmed

Defendants, and the Individual Conmed Defendants caused M.J.H.'s death.”)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jacquelyn Harrelson, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Clarence W. Dupnik, Sheriff of Pima

County, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-411-TUC-FRZ 

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge

Estrada. In his Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Estrada recommends denying

in part and granting in part Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. As the Court finds

that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the motions for summary

judgment, the objections are denied.1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Estrada’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 131) is accepted and

adopted.

(2) The motions for summary judgment (Docs. 100, 105) are denied in part and granted in

part as reflected in the Report and Recommendation.

Case 4:11-cv-00411-FRZ-BPV Document 137 Filed 08/27/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If the parties think that a settlement conference could be fruitful, the Court will refer

this case to another United States Magistrate Judge to preside over a settlement conference

at no cost to the parties. If the parties want to pursue this option, they should file a

stipulation requesting a settlement conference; upon receipt of such stipulation, the Court will

issue an Order assigning a United States Magistrate Judge for the conference and will stay

all the deadlines in the case pending the outcome of the settlement conference.

- 2 -

(3) The parties shall file a proposed Joint Pretrial Order on or before 9/27/13, which shall

include, but not be limited to, that prescribed in the form of Joint Pretrial Order attached. As

pretrial motions remain to be resolved as the Court expects that the parties will file motions

in limine, this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge to issue a Report and

Recommendation as to any motions in limine (or other pretrial motions). Motions in limine

shall be filed no later than the date of filing the proposed Joint Pretrial Order. Responses to

motions in limine are due 14 days after the filing of the motion. Unless otherwise ordered

by the Magistrate Judge, no replies are permitted and motions in limine and responses thereto

shall not exceed five pages. After the Court receives the Report and Recommendation, any

objections, and issues an Order as to the Report and Recommendation, the Court will

withdraw the reference to the Magistrate Judge and issue a final pretrial Order setting dates

for trial, the pretrial conference, and the filing of proposed jury instructions, voir dire and

verdict forms.2

DATED this 27th day of August, 2013.

Case 4:11-cv-00411-FRZ-BPV Document 137 Filed 08/27/13 Page 2 of 2