Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL MANRIQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

HUCHINS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00456-LJO-BAM PC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

TWENTY DAY DEADLINE

On July 6, 2011, the Court ordered Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff’s sixth motion

to compel, motion to stay the briefing schedule, motion for a sixty day extension of time to conduct

discovery, and motion to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Defendants did not file a

response or otherwise respond to the order. On July 27, 2011, the Court ordered that, within thirty

days, defense counsel pay sanctions of $16.80 for Plaintiff’s costs in bringing his fifth motion to

compel and $6.24 for Plaintiff’s costs in bringing the motion to determine the sufficiency of

Defendant Hacker’s objections. (ECF No. 65.) On September 22, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to

enforce the order of the court and requested additional sanctions. Defendants have failed to file an

opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l). 

Accordingly, within twentydays from the date of service of this order, Defendants shall show

cause why sanctions should not issue for Defendants’ failure to comply with the orders of the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 9, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

10c20k UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

Case 1:09-cv-00456-BAM Document 177 Filed 01/09/12 Page 1 of 1