Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01446/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01446-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

STIPULATION RE ADR 

Case No. C09-1446 CW

 n:\labor\li2009\090997\00604014.doc 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

ELIZABETH SALVESON, State Bar #83788 Chief Labor Attorney 

LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH, State Bar #129688 

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3933 

Facsimile: (415) 554-4248 

E-Mail: larry.hecimovich@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE COMMISSION, and 

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT 

DANIEL M. CRAWFORD 

354 Pine Street, Third Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-1442 

Facsimile: (415) 986-4056 

E-Mail: dan@dancrawfordlaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff / Petitioner 

MATTHEW P. TONSING 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MATTHEW P. TONSING, 

 Petitioner and Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE 

COMMISSION, and SAN FRANCISCO 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

 Respondents and Defendants. 

Case No. C09-1446 CW 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

MODIFYING ADR CUT-OFF DATE 

Trial Date: 1/10/2011

Case 3:09-cv-01446-RS Document 28 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 2
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 

Case No. C09-1446 CW

1 n:\labor\li2009\090997\00604014.doc 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 WHEREAS, the Court has not yet ruled on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Rule 12c), heard 

September 17, 2009; and 

 WHEREAS, the last day to complete Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures in this matter 

is January 19, 2010 and the parties believe that it would be efficacious to mediate the case prior to 

conducting discovery but subsequent to receiving the court's ruling on Defendant's motion; and 

 WHEREAS, the existing cut-off dates would not allow the parties to do so; 

 THEREFORE the parties stipulate to modify the Case Management Order as follows: 

 Extend the ADR cut off from January 19, 2010 to March 19, 2010; 

 The remaining deadlines, including the trial date and all related pre-trial deadlines shall 

remain as set. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Dated: January 13, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

ELIZABETH S. SALVESON 

Chief Labor Attorney 

LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH 

Deputy City Attorney 

By: /s/Lawrence Hecimovich

LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: January 13, 2010 By: /s/Daniel M. Crawford

Attorneys for Plaintiff / Petitioner 

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

 _________________________ 

 Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 Judge of the District Court 

1/22/10

Case 3:09-cv-01446-RS Document 28 Filed 01/22/10 Page 2 of 2