Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-04-01547/USCOURTS-ca8-04-01547-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

1

The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1547

___________

Cornelius Moore, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska

Gregory L. Sims; Unknown Wilhelm, *

Lt.; Luke Wilke; City of Lincoln * [UNPUBLISHED]

Police Department; Beverly Hawk; *

Cornhusker Place Detoxification *

Center; City of Lincoln, Nebraska, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: June 23, 2004

Filed: July 14, 2005 

___________

Before BYE, McMILLIAN and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Cornelius Moore, a Nebraska inmate, appeals from the final judgment entered

in the District Court1

 for the District of Nebraska denying Moore’s third Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60(b)(6) motion. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we conclude that the

Appellate Case: 04-1547 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/14/2005 Entry ID: 1928023
-2-

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. It was not filed

within a reasonable time, it presented arguments that could have been raised in a

timely appeal from the underlying judgment, and it also presented arguments that had

been previously rejected by the district court. See Swope v. Siegel-Robert, Inc., 243

F.3d 486, 498 (8th Cir.) (Rule 60(b) movant must demonstrate exceptional

circumstances to obtain relief; denial of motion reviewed for abuse of discretion),

cert. denied, 534 U.S. 887 (2001). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). We deny Moore’s motion for

production of the record. 

______________________________

Appellate Case: 04-1547 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/14/2005 Entry ID: 1928023