Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06268/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06268-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

Case No.: 5:07-cv-06268-EJD

ORDER AFTER PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

REZA NAGAHI,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT 

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:07-cv-06268-EJD 

ORDER AFTER PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE

On December 3, 2015, the parties to the above-entitled action appeared before Judge 

Edward J. Davila for a Pretrial Conference. Based on a review of the action and the discussions 

held at the conference, the court orders as follows:

1. Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s opinion filed July 11, 2014, this action was 

remanded to this court “so that [Plaintiff] might be provided with two possible forms of relief to 

which he may be eligible: the appropriate measure of Additional Trade Readjustment Allowance 

monetary benefits to which he is entitled by statute, and a written notification regarding his 

application for Remedial Education benefits.” 

2. As to the first possible form of relief to which Plaintiff “may be eligible,” the court 

determined that that the parties must submit their respective proposals of “the appropriate measure 

of Additional Trade Readjustment Allowance monetary benefits to which [Plaintiff] is entitled by 

statute.” Accordingly, on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 22, 2016, each party shall serve and 

file a supplemental brief which: (1) explains and calculates their position as to “the appropriate 

measure,” (2) cites all legal authority which supports the calculation, and (3) explains what order 

this court should issue to finally resolve this action, keeping in mind both the claims asserted in 

Case 5:07-cv-06268-EJD Document 293 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:07-cv-06268-EJD

ORDER AFTER PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

the Complaint, this action’s procedural history, and the specific instruction provided by the Ninth 

Circuit on remand. Thereafter, on or before 5:00 p.m. on February 12, 2016, each party shall 

serve and file a response to the other party’s supplemental brief. 

3. Upon receiving and reviewing the supplemental briefing described above, the court 

will determine whether an additional hearing is necessary to carry out the Ninth Circuit’s 

instructions on remand and, if so, what form that hearing should take. As such, the court trial

scheduled for December 15, 2015, is VACATED. 

4. As to the second form of relief to which Plaintiff “may be eligible,” counsel for 

Defendants stated at the conference that “a written notification regarding [Plaintiff’s] application 

for Remedial Education benefits” would issue on or before 5:00 p.m. on December 18, 2015. 

The court orders that such notice issue by that date and time in accordance with counsel’s 

statement. 

 5. The court schedules this action for a Status Conference at 10:00 a.m. on February 

25, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 3, 2015

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:07-cv-06268-EJD Document 293 Filed 12/03/15 Page 2 of 2