Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00502/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00502-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned,

plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his

current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record

address of the party is fully effective.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD WALLACE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0502 JAM EFB P

vs.

JERRY BROWN, et al., 

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. On May 4, 2010, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a

cognizable claim against any defendant. The dismissal order explained the complaint’s

deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies,

and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. 

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the court’s order.1

Case 2:09-cv-00502-JAM-EFB Document 10 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice

for failure to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: July 26, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-00502-JAM-EFB Document 10 Filed 07/26/10 Page 2 of 2