Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-01084/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-01084-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MYCHAEL TYRONE SHANNON,

Plaintiff,

v.

RALPH DIAZ, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:17-CV-1084-JAM-DMC-P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. § 1983. An answer has been filed and the case is now at issue. 

The undersigned is referring all post-screening civil rights cases filed by pro se 

state inmates to the Post-Screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project in an effort to 

resolve such cases more expeditiously and less expensively. Defense counsel from the Office of 

the California Attorney General has agreed to participate in this pilot project. No defenses or 

objections shall be waived by their participation. 

As set forth in the screening order, Plaintiff has stated a potentially cognizable 

civil rights claim. Thus, the Court stays this action for a period of 120 days to allow the parties to 

investigate Plaintiff’s claims, meet and confer, and then participate in a settlement conference. 

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:17-cv-01084-DAD-DMC Document 61 Filed 11/29/21 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

There is a presumption that all post-screening prisoner civil rights cases assigned 

to the undersigned will proceed to settlement conference.1 However, if after investigating 

Plaintiff’s claims and speaking with Plaintiff, and after conferring with defense counsel’s 

supervisor, defense counsel in good faith finds that a settlement conference would be a waste of 

resources, defense counsel may move to opt out of this pilot project. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is stayed for 120 days from the date of this order to allow the 

parties an opportunity to settle their dispute before the discovery process begins. Except as 

provided herein or by subsequent court order, no other pleadings or other documents may be filed 

in this case during the stay of this action. The parties shall not engage in formal discovery, but 

the parties may elect to engage in informal discovery. 

2. Any motion to opt out of the Post-screening ADR Project shall be filed 

within 30 days from the date of this order. 

3. If a settlement is reached at any point during the stay of this action, the 

parties shall file a Notice of Settlement in accordance with Local Rule 160. 

4. The parties remain obligated to keep the Court informed of their current 

addresses at all times during the stay and while the action is pending. Any change of address must 

be reported promptly to the Court in a separate document captioned for this case and entitled 

“Notice of Change of Address.” See Local Rule 182(f). 

Dated: November 29, 2021

____________________________________

DENNIS M. COTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

 If the case does not settle, the Court will issue a discovery and scheduling order.

Case 2:17-cv-01084-DAD-DMC Document 61 Filed 11/29/21 Page 2 of 2