Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05224/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05224-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN PATRICK MCGUIRE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WILLIAM FRYE, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-05224 WHA

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

RESPONSIVE PLEADING

A previous order adopted in full the report of Magistrate Judge Joe Spero, which

recommended that plaintiff John McGuire’s pro se complaint be dismissed (Dkt. No. 10). 

Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on March 17, 2016, which was served on defendant on

April 28, 2016. Now, defendant asks the court for an extension of 30 days to respond to

plaintiff’s complaint in order to obtain certified records from the Sonoma County Court. 

Defendant contends that the court records will show that the claims alleged in plaintiff’s

amended complaint are barred by res judicata. Defendant has not previously sought an

extension of time. According to a declaration by defendant’s attorney, plaintiff has been

contacted about the extension and is agreeable to it. Defendant’s application for an extension is

GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to the amended complaint by NOON ON JUNE 20, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 17, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-05224-WHA Document 19 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 1