Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07297/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07297-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This disposition is not designated for publication and may not be cited. 1

Case No. C 06-7297 JF (RS)

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

(JFLC1)

**E-Filed 2/13/2007**

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CARL E. PERSON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

GOOGLE INC.,

 Defendant.

Case Number C 06-7297 JF (RS)

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND 1

GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

[re: docket no. 21]

On February 9, 2007, Plaintiff moved for leave to file an amended complaint, or

alternatively, to extend the time in which to respond to Defendant’s motion to dismiss three

weeks beyond the existing deadline of February 9, 2007.

On September 18, 2006, Judge Patterson of the Southern District of New York

determined that Plaintiff previously exercised his right to amend his complaint on August 3,

2006. Accordingly, Plaintiff may not amend his complaint as of right. Having reviewed the

papers submitted by both parties, the Court concludes that it should consider whether to permit

Plaintiff to file an amended complaint in the context of the motion to dismiss. 

Plaintiff represents that he has briefed a similar, now-mooted motion in the past and that

Case 5:06-cv-07297-JF Document 29 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 06-7297 JF (RS)

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

(JFLC1)

he has responded to Defendant’s arguments in the proposed amended complaint. Under these

circumstances, Plaintiff should be able to file opposition to the motion to dismiss shortly and

should be prepared to argue why leave to amend should be granted in the event that the Court

grants the motion. Accordingly, the Court will reschedule the hearing on the motion to March 9,

2007. Plaintiff shall file any opposition on or before February 20, 2007. Defendant shall file any

reply on or before February 27, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 13, 2007.

 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-07297-JF Document 29 Filed 02/13/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case No. C 06-7297 JF (RS)

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

(JFLC1)

This Order has been served upon the following persons:

Ethan B. Andelman andelmane@howrey.com, gagnons@howrey.com 

Dawn Beery dbeery@kelleydrye.com 

Susan Jean Greenspon sgreenspon@kelleydrye.com, cplater@kelleydrye.com;

vallen@kelleydrye.com; sdunlap@kelleydrye.com 

Ravind Singh Grewal rsg@kvn.com 

Klaus Hemingway Hamm khamm@kvn.com, efiling@kvn.com; wik@kvn.com 

Ajay Krishnan akrishnan@kvn.com, efiling@kvn.com; rthomas@kvn.com 

Mark A. Lemley mlemley@kvn.com, srosen@kvn.com 

Michael H. Page mhp@kvn.com, efiling@kvn.com; sjr@kvn.com;

nsn@kvn.com 

Robert Nathan Phillips phillipsr@howrey.com, gagnons@howrey.com 

Caroline Claire Plater cplater@kelleydrye.com, heberhart@kelleydrye.com 

David A. Rammelt drammelt@kelleydrye.com, sdunlap@kelleydrye.com 

Notice will be delivered by other means to:

Paul W. Garrity 

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

101 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10178

Case 5:06-cv-07297-JF Document 29 Filed 02/13/07 Page 3 of 3