Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-00113/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-00113-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:9607 Real Property Tort to Land

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMERIPRIDE SERVICES, INC.,

A Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-00-0113 LKK JFM

vs. (Consolidated)

VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC.,

a former California corporation, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

HUHTAMAKI FOODSERVICE, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

AMERIPRIDE SERVICES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. 

 /

Plaintiff Huhtamaki’s April 14, 2006 motion to compel further response to request

for production came on regularly for hearing May 11, 2006. Plaintiff Huhtamaki was represented

by Stephen J. Darmody and John Nelson. Lee N. Smith and Scott Kaplan appeared for defendant

AmeriPride. Bob Shannon appeared for Mission Linen Supply. Upon review of the motion and

Case 2:00-cv-00113-MCE-DB Document 286 Filed 05/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of plaintiff and counsel

and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

Counsel agreed to resolve this dispute by issuance of the following order:

Defendant AmeriPride shall produce the materials sought by close of business May 15, 2006 or,

if the materials sought are not in AmeriPride’s possession or subject to AmeriPride’s control,

AmeriPride shall file a declaration, signed under penalty of perjury, from a responsible official of

AmeriPride, stating the items sought are not in AmeriPride’s custody or subject to AmeriPride’s

control. 

Good cause appearing, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiff Huhtamaki’s April 14, 2006 motion to compel further response to

request for production is partially granted; and 

2. Defendant AmeriPride shall produce the materials sought by close of business

May 15, 2006 or, if the materials sought are not in AmeriPride’s possession or subject to

AmeriPride’s control, AmeriPride shall file a declaration, signed under penalty of perjury, from a

responsible official of AmeriPride, stating the items sought are not in AmeriPride’s custody or

subject to AmeriPride’s control. 

DATED: May 15, 2006.

/001

huhtamaki.oah5.11

Case 2:00-cv-00113-MCE-DB Document 286 Filed 05/16/06 Page 2 of 2