Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-02155/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-02155-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice

Of all Claims at to Defendant County of Santa Clara

CV14-02155 RMW

ORRY P. KORB, County Counsel (S.B. #114399)

MICHAEL C. SERVERIAN, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #133203)

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL

70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor

San Jose, California 95110-1770

Telephone: (408) 299-5900

Facsimile: (408) 292-7240

Attorneys for Defendant

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

D.V., a minor, Successor-in-Interest for Decedent

JUAN CARLOS RUELAS, by and through his

Guardian ad Litem Rosemary Viramontes; JOSE

LUIS RUELAS, and REBECA RUELAS,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF SUNNYVALE, CITY OF SANTA

CLARA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, and

DOES 1-50, inclusive,

Defendants.

No. CV14-02155 RMW

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF

ALL CLAIMS AS TO DEFENDANT

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ONLY

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs D.V., a minor, Successor-inInterest for Decedent Juan Carlos Ruelas, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Rosemary

Viramontes, Jose Ruelas and Rebeca Ruelas, acting by and through their attorney Ben Nisenbaum,

and Defendant County of Santa Clara, by and through its counsel of record, Michael Serverian

(hereinafter “Parties”) as follows:

Plaintiffs, acting by and through their counsel of record, dismisses their complaint and all

claims included therein with prejudice as to Defendant County of Santa Clara only. The parties

agree that each party will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees, and further request that the Court

Order this dismissal as to the County of Santa Clara only.

/ /

(),/('

Case 5:14-cv-02155-RMW Document 39 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice

Of all Claims at to Defendant County of Santa Clara

CV14-02155 RMW

Co-defendant City of Santa Clara, acting by and through their counsel of record, Jon A.

Heaberlin has no objection to this Stipulation and hereby joins in this Stipulation.

I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures

indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: January 13, 2015

ORRY P. KORB

County Counsel

By: /S/ .

MICHAEL C. SERVERIAN

Deputy County Counsel

Attorneys for Defendant

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Dated: January 13, 2015

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

By: /S/ .

JOHN L. BURRIS

BEN NISENBAUM

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: January 13, 2015

RANKIN STOCK HEABERLIN

By: /S/ .

JON A. HEABERLIN

Attorneys for Defendant

CITY OF SANTA CLARA

Case 5:14-cv-02155-RMW Document 39 Filed 01/16/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice

Of all Claims at to Defendant County of Santa Clara

CV14-02155 RMW

ORDER

Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that plaintiffs’ complaint and action herein is dismissed in full and with prejudice as to

Defendant County of Santa Clara only, each party to bear their own costs and fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________ __________________________________

HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Court Judge

1041490

Case 5:14-cv-02155-RMW Document 39 Filed 01/16/15 Page 3 of 3