Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01402/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01402-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Alvaro Quezada is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On March 5, 2015, Defendants requested and this Court granted an extension of time to file a 

dispositive motion. (ECF Nos. 72, 73.) In the request, defense counsel declared that Defendant Patel 

recently suffered a stroke and is unavailable to review or sign a declaration to support a motion for 

summary judgment. (ECF No. 72.) 

On March 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed objections to the Defendants’ request for an extension of 

time to file a dispositive motion. (ECF No. 71.) 

///

///

///

///

ALVARO QUEZADA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

R. LINDSEY, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01402-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S 

OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST 

TO EXTEND THE TIME TO FILE A 

DISPOSITIVE MOTION

[ECF Nos. 73, 75]

Case 1:10-cv-01402-DAD-SAB Document 76 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff’s objections do not overcome the showing of good cause presented by Defendants in 

their motion to extend the time to file a dispositive motion, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

Plaintiff’s objections to Defendants’ request to extend the time are OVERRULED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 17, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01402-DAD-SAB Document 76 Filed 03/17/15 Page 2 of 2