Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00134/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00134-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD HAYES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES; CREDIT ONE 

BANK; and FISHES & LOAVES, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:19-cv-134-KJM-EFB PS 

ORDER 

On March 31, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.1

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 

magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 

1

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was 

returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court 

apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents 

at the record address of the party is fully effective. 

Case 2:19-cv-00134-KJM-EFB Document 5 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 

the record and by the proper analysis. 

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 

 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 31, 2020, are ADOPTED; and 

 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim as set forth in 

the February 6, 2020 order (ECF No. 3). 

DATED: April 23, 2020. 

Case 2:19-cv-00134-KJM-EFB Document 5 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 2