Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-90-03099/USCOURTS-ca10-90-03099-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 

---

f 1 L E I? A peals . ed States Court ~ p. Uo1t h Circuit 'fent 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS . FEB .: 1991 

TENTH CIRCUIT R 

-----------ROBERT L. HOECKE 

Clerk 

ROBERT E. FOSTER, JR., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

LARRY B. BERRONG, JR., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 90-3099 

(D.C. No. 89-3423-0) 

(Dist. Kansas) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before LOGAN, SEYMOUR, and TACHA, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered 

submitted without oral argument. 

Petitioner Robert E. Foster appeals the district court's 

dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We have 

reviewed the record of the proceedings and pleadings before the 

military courts, as well as the pleadings filed in the district 

*This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Appellate Case: 90-3099 Document: 010110098423 Date Filed: 02/04/1991 Page: 1 
.; 

court, along with the district court's Memorandum and Order, and 

we have carefully considered Mr. Foster's arguments in light of 

these records. 

Based on the principles of law set forth in Watson v. 

Mccotter, 782 F.2d 143 (10th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 

1184 (1986), we affirm substantially for the reasons stated in the 

district court's Memorandum and Order dated April 10, 1990. 'the 

mandate shall issue forthwith. 

-2-

Entered for the Court 

Stephanie K. Seymour 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 90-3099 Document: 010110098423 Date Filed: 02/04/1991 Page: 2