Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01529/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01529-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHLEEN EMERSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KRISTA MITCHELL,

Defendant.

No. 2:19-cv-01529-TLN-DB

ORDER

On August 9, 2019, Defendant Krista Mitchell (“Defendant”), proceeding pro se, filed a 

Notice of Removal of this action, Yolo County Superior Court Case No. PT19-1466, along with a 

Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On January 6, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were 

served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and 

recommendations. (ECF No. 4.) The time for filing objections has expired, and no party has 

filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

Case 2:19-cv-01529-TLN-DB Document 5 Filed 03/09/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings 

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 6, 2020 (ECF No. 4), are adopted in

full; 

2. Defendant’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed on August 9, 2019 (ECF No.

2), is DENIED;

3. This action is REMANDED to the Yolo County Superior Court; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is ordered not to open another case removing Yolo County

Superior Court Case No. PT19-1466. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 6, 2020 

Case 2:19-cv-01529-TLN-DB Document 5 Filed 03/09/20 Page 2 of 2