Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-03010/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-03010-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

CONTINUANCE OF ADR DATE– CASE NO. C 07-03010 CW 

pa-1239759 

JAMES POOLEY (CA SBN 58041) 

L. SCOTT OLIVER (CA SBN 174824) 

DIANA LUO (CA SBN 233712) 

KATHERINE NOLAN-STEVAUX (CA SBN 244950) 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 

Telephone: (650) 813-5600 

Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 

JPooley@mofo.com 

SOliver@mofo.com 

DLuo@mofo.com 

KNolanstevaux@mofo.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

OPTOVUE CORPORATION and 

Counterdefendants OPTOVUE CORPORATION, 

JAY WEI and YONGHUA ZHAO 

DONALD L. BARTELS #65142 

BRUCE E. COPELAND #124888 

NIXON PEABODY LLP 

One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3600 

Telephone: (415) 984-8200 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8300 

dbartels@nixonpeabody.com 

bcopeland@nixonpeabody.com 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION 

OPTOVUE CORPORATION, a California 

Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC., a New York 

Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

AND RELATED COUNTERACTION. 

Case No. C 07-03010 CW 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF 

DATE OF ADR COMPLETION 

The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW Document 46 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

CONTINUANCE OF ADR DATE– CASE NO. C 07-03010 CW 2

pa-1239759 

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 7-12, Optovue Corporation and Carl Zeiss 

Meditec, Inc. (collectively “the Parties”) hereby jointly submit this stipulation regarding a 

continuance of the date by which the parties must complete ADR: 

WHEREAS, on October 25, 2007, the Court issued a Case Management Order setting 

April 15, 2008 as the date by which ADR must be completed; 

WHEREAS, the parties are currently scheduled to appear before Mark D. Petersen for 

mediation on March 20, 2008; 

WHEREAS, both parties are diligently conducting discovery and agree that further 

discovery is necessary in order to have a productive mediation; 

WHEREAS, both parties and the mediator are currently available on April 24, 2008; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, and through their respective 

attorneys of record, as follows: 

The Court shall continue the date by which ADR must be completed to April 30, 2008; 

The parties shall in good faith appear before Mr. Petersen for mediation on or about April 

24, 2008 (subject to Mr. Petersen’s continuing availability). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW Document 46 Filed 03/13/08 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

CONTINUANCE OF ADR DATE– CASE NO. C 07-03010 CW 

pa-1239759 

3

Dated: March 11, 2008 JAMES POOLEY 

L. SCOTT OLIVER 

DIANA LUO 

KATHERINE NOLAN-STEVAUX 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By: /s/Diana Luo 

 Diana Luo 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 OPTOVUE CORPORATION and 

 Counterdefendants OPTOVUE 

 CORPORATION, INC.; JAY WEI 

 and YONGHUA ZHAO 

Dated: March 11, 2008 DONALD L. BARTELS 

BRUCE E. COPELAND 

LAURA K. CARTER 

NIXON PEABODY LLP 

By: /s/ Donald L. Bartels 

 Donald L. Bartels 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, 

INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 3/13/08 

DATED: 

 The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Judge 

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW Document 46 Filed 03/13/08 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

CONTINUANCE OF ADR DATE– CASE NO. C 07-03010 CW 

pa-1239759 

4

I, Diana Luo, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation Regarding Continuance of Date of ADR Completion. In compliance with General 

Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Donald L. Bartels has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: March 11, 2008 Morrison & Foerster LLP 

By: /s/ Diana Luo 

 Diana Luo 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

OPTOVUE CORPORATION and 

Counterdefendants OPTOVUE 

CORPORATION, INC.; JAY WEI and 

YONGHUA ZHAO 

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW Document 46 Filed 03/13/08 Page 4 of 4