Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-01034/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-01034-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEDIDIAH MORELOS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:18-cv-01034-NONE-SAB

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT 

CONFERENCE BEFORE JUDGE 

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

(ECF No. 65)

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, a settlement conference is hereby scheduled for 

February 18, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. before United States Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman in 

Courtroom 25 at the Robert T. Matsui United States Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 

95814. 

The parties are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present for the 

settlement conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. The individual 

with full settlement authority to settle must also have unfettered discretion and authority to 

change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. The purpose behind requiring 

attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties view of the case may be 

altered during the face to face conference. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount 

or sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full authority to settle. The 

parties are directed to exchange non-confidential settlement conference statements seven days 

Case 1:18-cv-01034-DAD-SAB Document 66 Filed 02/07/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

prior to the settlement conference. These statements shall be simultaneously delivered to the 

Court using the following email address: kjnorders@caed.uscourts.gov. These statements should 

not be filed on the case docket. If a party desires to share additional confidential information 

with the Court, they may do so pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 7, 2020 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:18-cv-01034-DAD-SAB Document 66 Filed 02/07/20 Page 2 of 2