Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01486/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01486-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK A. CASTILLO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LEHMAN BROTHERS, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 07-01486 JSW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On April 24, 2007, defendant Lehman Brothers, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a motion to

compel arbitration and noticed it to be heard on June 15, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. On May 1, 2007,

this Court issued a briefing schedule on the pending motion to compel arbitration and informed

plaintiff Mark A. Castillo (“Plaintiff”) that his opposition to the motion was due to be filed by

no later than May 16, 2007. To date, no opposition has been filed. 

Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE (“OSC”) in writing, by May 29,

2007, why the pending motion to compel arbitration should not be granted in light of his failure

to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. If Plaintiff seeks to file a substantive

response to Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff must demonstrate good cause for failing to file his

opposition brief in a timely fashion. In his response to this OSC, Plaintiff is also directed to

show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is

admonished that his failure to respond this Order by May 29, 2007, will result in a dismissal of

this action.

Case 3:07-cv-01486-JSW Document 13 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If Plaintiff seeks to file a substantive response to Defendant’s motion and demonstrates

good cause for his delay, the Court will provide Defendant an opportunity to file a reply brief.

The hearing on Defendant’s motion remains set for June 15, 2007, unless otherwise ordered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 21, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-01486-JSW Document 13 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK A. CASTILLO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LEHMAN BROTHERS et al,

Defendant. /

Case Number: CV07-01486 JSW 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on May 21, 2007, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing

said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office

delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Mark A. Castillo

611 Guerrero St #15

San Francisco, CA 94110

Peter R. Boutin

Keesal Young & Logan

Suite 1500

Four Embarcadero Center

San Francisco, CA 94111

Dated: May 21, 2007

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:07-cv-01486-JSW Document 13 Filed 05/21/07 Page 3 of 3