Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04500/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04500-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [] Order - C-O7-4500 RMW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION

BRIAN O’DONNELL, MICHAEL VAN

BELLEGHEM, PATRICIA VAN

BELLEGHEM, individually and on behalf of all

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION a.k.a. BANK OF AMERICA,

N.A., and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,

Defendants..

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C-07-04500 RMW

Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

Ctrm: 6

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS

MOTION TO DISMISS

Complaint Filed: August 29, 2007

Trial Date: Not set yet

*E-FILED - 1/25/08*

Case 5:07-cv-04500-RMW Document 23 Filed 01/25/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [] Order - C-O7-4500 RMW

-2-

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, BRIAN O’DONNELL, MICHAEL VAN BELLEGHEM, PATRICIA

VAN BELLEGHEM (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) filed their First Amended Complaint on October 11,

2007.

WHEREFORE, Defendants, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION a.k.a. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (hereinafter “Defendants”), filed their

Motion to Dismiss Complaint on December 21, 2007.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs have reviewed Defendants motion and believe they can cure any

alleged defects in their Complaint by filing an amended pleading.

WHEREFORE, on January 21, 2008, Plaintiffs provided Defendants with a copy of their

proposed Second Amended Complaint.

WHEREFORE, in order to allow Defendants time to review Plaintiffs proposed Second

Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs request that the hearing on Defendants motion to dismiss, currently set

to be heard on February 15, 2008, be continued to February 29, 2008. 

Respectfully Submitted,

DATED: January 22, 2008 SPIRO MOSS BARNESS LLP

By: /s/ David M. Arbogast

on behalf of Plaintiffs

DATED: January 22, 2008 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ 

Michael J. Agoglia

on behalf of Defendants

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 5:07-cv-04500-RMW Document 23 Filed 01/25/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [] Order - C-O7-4500 RMW

-3-

[] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation of counsel and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint set for February 11, 2008 is

continued to February 29, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: January __, 2008 ________________________

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Court Judge

25

Case 5:07-cv-04500-RMW Document 23 Filed 01/25/08 Page 3 of 3