Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02116/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02116-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2116

JULIET WRIGHT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JAMES CITY COUNTY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, 

Chief District Judge. (4:12-cv-00153-RBS-LRL)

Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juliet Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Allison Anne Kotula, JAMES 

CITY COUNTY ATTORNEY, Williamsburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2116 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Juliet Wright appeals the district court’s order denying 

her motion to disqualify the trial judge and magistrate judge 

and her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. With respect to Wright’s 

motion to disqualify, we have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm that portion of the 

district court’s order for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Wright v. James City Cnty., No. 4:12-cv-00153-RBSLRL (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 21, 2015, entered Aug. 24, 2015). 

With respect to the denial of Wright’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 

60(b) motion, we confine our appellate review to the issues 

raised in the Appellant’s informal opening brief. See 4th Cir. 

R. 34(b). Because Wright’s informal opening brief does not 

challenge the basis for the district court’s denial of her Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, Wright has forfeited appellate review 

of that portion of the court’s order. Wright’s motion for 

appointment of counsel is denied.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-2116 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 2