Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01403/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01403-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIONELL ERNEST THOLMER, 1:06-cv-01403-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

vs. (Doc. 41.)

JAMES A. YATES, et al., ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' 

MOTION TO DISMISS

(Doc. 35.)

ORDER REVOKING PLAINTIFF'S IN 

Defendants. FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS

ORDER VACATING ORDER GRANTING 

LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(Doc. 15.)

ORDER VACATING ORDER DIRECTING 

CDCR TO MAKE PAYMENT OF FILING FEE

(Doc. 16.)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO 

PAY $350.00 FILING FEE IN FULL FOR

THIS ACTION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS,

OR THIS CASE WILL BE DISMISSED

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SERVE

THIS ORDER ON THE CDCR AND THE

COURT'S FINANCIAL DEPARTMENT

_____________________________/

///

1

Case 1:06-cv-01403-LJO-GSA Document 42 Filed 06/24/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Lionell Ernest Tholmer (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

 On May 17, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

defendants' motion to dismiss be denied, plaintiff's in forma pauperis status be revoked, and that

plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee in full for this action. (Doc. 41.) Plaintiff was granted

thirty days in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. To date, plaintiff has

not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-

305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on May

17, 2010, are ADOPTED in full;

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss, filed on March 8, 2010, is DENIED;

3. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is REVOKED;

4. Plaintiff is REQUIRED to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full for this action,

within thirty days from the date of service of this order. To pay the filing fee,

Plaintiff shall send a cashier's check or money order, referring to case number

1:06-cv-01403-LJO-GSA-PC, for $350.00 made payable to the United States

District Court, at:

United States District Court

Clerk's Office

2500 Tulare Street, Room 1050

Fresno, CA 93721 

5. The court’s order of January 11, 2007, granting leave for plaintiff to proceed

in forma pauperis, is VACATED;

2

Case 1:06-cv-01403-LJO-GSA Document 42 Filed 06/24/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6. The court’s order of January 11, 2007, directing the CDCR to make payment

of the filing fee, is VACATED; and

7. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order upon:

(1) the Director of the CDCR, Sacramento, California, and

(2) the Financial Department, U.S. District Court, Eastern District

of California, Fresno Division.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3

Case 1:06-cv-01403-LJO-GSA Document 42 Filed 06/24/10 Page 3 of 3