Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05108/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05108-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE DIAZ, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

C/O VIGIL, 

Defendant. 

 /

1:03-cv-05108-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 56)

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 47)

Plaintiff Jose Diaz (“plaintiff”), a former state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 30, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:03-cv-05108-OWW -LJO Document 58 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Failure to

appear for a deposition is a serious violation of discovery. If

plaintiff again fails to appear this case will be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 30, 2005,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss as a sanction, filed

February 22, 2005, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

37(d), is DENIED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 15, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05108-OWW -LJO Document 58 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2