Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00845/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00845-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND AND 

CONTINUING CMC

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00232 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00338 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00598 JST

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00845 JST 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LAW

SAN FRA N CI S CO

SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB No. 126930)

smuck@fenwick.com

CATHERINE D. KEVANE (CSB No. 215501)

ckevane@fenwick.com

KAITLIN O. KELLER (CSB No. 298737)

kkeller@fenwick.com

FENWICK & WEST LLP

555 California Street, 12th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415.875.2300

Facsimile: 415.281.1350

Attorneys for Defendants

GoPro, Inc., Nicholas Woodman,

Jack Lazar, and Anthony Bates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JOSEPH BODRI, Individually and On Behalf of 

All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOPRO, INC., NICHOLAS WOODMAN, and 

JACK LAZAR,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00232 JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR ALL 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINTS AND CONTINUING 

CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCES

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Date Action Filed: January 13, 2016

BARRY LEE DEEM, on behalf of himself and 

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOPRO, INC., NICHOLAS WOODMAN, and 

JACK LAZAR,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00338 JST

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Date Action Filed: January 21, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-00845-JST Document 12 Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND AND 

CONTINUING CMC

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00232 JST

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00338 JST

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00598 JST

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00845 JST 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LAW

SAN FRA N CI S CO

RENE VAN MEERBEKE, Individually and on 

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

GOPRO, INC., NICHOLAS WOODMAN, and 

JACK LAZAR, and ANTHONY J. BATES

 Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00598 JST

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Date Action Filed: February 4, 2016

MAJESTY PALMS, LLLP, Individually and on 

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

GOPRO, INC., NICHOLAS WOODMAN, and 

JACK LAZAR,

 Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00845 JST

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Date Action Filed: February 19, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-00845-JST Document 12 Filed 03/17/16 Page 2 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND AND 

CONTINUING CMC 1

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00232 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00338 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00598 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00845 JST 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LAW

SAN FRA N CI S CO

WHEREAS, the following actions are proposed class actions alleging violations of the 

federal securities laws against GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro” or the “Company”), Nicholas Woodman,

Jack Lazar, and/or Anthony Bates (collectively, “Defendants”):

Bodri v. GoPro, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-00232 JST, filed on January 13, 2016 

(“Bodri”); 

Deem v. GoPro, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-00338 JST, filed on January 21, 2016 

(“Deem”); 

Rene Van Meerbeke v. GoPro, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-00598 JST, filed on February

4, 2016 (“Van Meerbeke”); and

Majesty Palms, LLLP v. GoPro, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-00845 JST, filed on 

February 19, 2016 (“Majesty Palms”)

(together, the “Securities Actions”);

WHEREAS, on January 14, 2016, this Court issued an Initial Case Management 

Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 6) in Bodri, the first-filed action, setting the following deadlines:

1. March 23, 2016 for the parties to comply with certain requirements under the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Northern District of California Civil 

Local Rules (“Local Rules” or “Civil L.R.”) and Alternative Dispute Resolution 

(“ADR”) Local Rules regarding discovery, early settlement, and the ADR MultiOption Program; and

2. April 6, 2016 for the parties to file a Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial 

disclosures or state objections in the Rule 26(f) Report, and file a Joint Case 

Management Statement; and

3. April 13, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. for an initial case management conference;

WHEREAS, on January 27, 2016 and on February 16, 2016, the Court issued Orders

deeming the Deem and Van Meerbeke actions “related cases” within the meaning of Civil L.R. 3-

12 and ordering that the case management deadlines in the reassigned cases be rescheduled (Dkt. 

Nos. 9, 11);

Case 3:16-cv-00845-JST Document 12 Filed 03/17/16 Page 3 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND AND 

CONTINUING CMC 2

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00232 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00338 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00598 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00845 JST 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LAW

SAN FRA N CI S CO

WHEREAS, on March 7, 2016, a stipulated administrative motion to relate the Majesty 

Palms action was filed, and on March 14, 2016, the Court issued an Order deeming the Majesty 

Palms action a “related case” within the meaning of Civil L.R. 3-12 (Dkt. Nos. 13, 42);

WHEREAS, the Securities Actions are subject to the requirements of the Private 

Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-67, 109 Stat. 737 (1995) (the “Reform 

Act”), which sets forth specialized procedures for the administration of securities class actions; 

WHEREAS, the Reform Act provides for the appointment of a lead plaintiff to act on 

behalf of the purported class, and further provides that the appointment of lead plaintiff shall not 

be made until after a decision on a motion to consolidate is rendered (15 U.S.C. § 78u4(a)(3)(B)(ii));

WHEREAS, on March 14, 2016, motions for consolidation and for appointment of lead 

plaintiff and lead counsel in the consolidated actions were filed (“Lead Plaintiff Motions”) (Dkt.

Nos. 15, 16, 21, 26, 31, 32, 36, 40); 

WHEREAS, the parties expect that the Court will set a schedule for a consolidated 

complaint to be filed after the determination of the Lead Plaintiff Motions; 

WHEREAS, Defendants anticipate filing motions to dismiss the claims asserted against 

them; 

WHEREAS, because the special procedures specified in the Reform Act contemplate 

(i) the consolidation of similar actions; (ii) appointment of lead plaintiff; and (iii) the filing of a 

single consolidated complaint by lead plaintiff and counsel to be appointed by the Court, 

requiring Defendants to respond to the initial complaints in each of the Securities Actions would 

result in the needless expenditure of private and judicial resources; and

WHEREAS, counsel for the plaintiffs and defendants in the Securities Actions

respectfully submit that good cause exists to vacate the existing April 13, 2016 initial case 

management conference and associated ADR deadlines until such time as the Court has the 

opportunity to rule on the appointment of lead plaintiff and approval of lead counsel;

Case 3:16-cv-00845-JST Document 12 Filed 03/17/16 Page 4 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND AND 

CONTINUING CMC 3

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00232 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00338 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00598 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00845 JST 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LAW

SAN FRA N CI S CO

IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the 

Parties, that:

1. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), the defendants’ obligation to answer, move or otherwise 

respond to the complaint in any of the Securities Actions (i.e., the Bodri, Deem, Van 

Meerbeke and Majesty Palms complaints) is stayed pending the appointment of lead 

plaintiff and lead counsel. Thereafter, the parties shall meet and confer and submit a 

mutually agreeable schedule for (i) the filing of a consolidated complaint (or 

designation of an operative complaint), (ii) defendants’ responses to the consolidated 

or operative complaint, and (iii) the briefing of any motions to dismiss filed by

defendants. The consolidated or operative complaint shall supersede all complaints 

filed in any action that is consolidated herein. 

2. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-2, the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for 

April 13, 2016 be vacated, along with any associated deadlines under the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules, to be rescheduled for a date after the filing 

of the consolidated complaint or after the Court rules on defendants’ anticipated 

motion(s) to dismiss the consolidated complaint, as the Court determines to be 

appropriate; all associated ADR Multi-Option Program deadlines likewise be deferred; 

and any case management conference and associated deadlines being rescheduled by 

the Court in the recently related Deem, Van Meerbeke and Majesty Palms matters be 

similarly scheduled in light of the foregoing.

Dated: March 16, 2016 FENWICK & WEST LLP

By: /s/ Catherine D. Kevane 

 Catherine D. Kevane 

555 California Street, 12th Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

Phone: (415) 875-2300

Fax: (415) 281-1350

Attorneys for Defendants

GoPro, Inc., Nicholas Woodman,

Jack Lazar, and Anthony Bates

Case 3:16-cv-00845-JST Document 12 Filed 03/17/16 Page 5 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND AND 

CONTINUING CMC 4

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00232 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00338 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00598 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00845 JST 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LAW

SAN FRA N CI S CO

Dated: March 16, 2016 GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP

By: /s/ Charles H. Linehan 

Lionel Z. Glancy 

Robert V. Prongay

Lesley F. Portnoy 

Charles H. Linehan

1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Phone: (310) 201-9150

Fax: (310) 201-9160

Email: lglancy@glancylaw.com

 rprongay@glancylaw.com 

 lportnoy@glancylaw.com

 clinehan@glancylaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Joseph Bodri

Dated: March 16, 2016 KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP

By: /s/ Laurence D. King

Laurence D. King

Mario Man-Lung Choi

350 Sansome Street, Suite 400

San Francisco, CA 94104

Phone: (415) 772-4700

Fax: (415) 772-4707

Email: lking@kaplanfox.com

 mchoi@kaplanfox.com

Robert N. Kaplan

Jeffrey Phillip Campisi

Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP

850 Third Avenue, 14th Floor 

New York, NY 10022 

Phone: (212) 687-1980

Fax: (212) 687-7714

Email: rkaplan@kaplanfox.com

 jcampisi@kaplanfox.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Barry Lee Deem

Case 3:16-cv-00845-JST Document 12 Filed 03/17/16 Page 6 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND AND 

CONTINUING CMC 5

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00232 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00338 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00598 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00845 JST 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LAW

SAN FRA N CI S CO

Dated: March 16, 2016 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP

By: /s/ Shawn A. Williams

Shawn A. Williams

 Post Montgomery Center

One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800

San Francisco, CA 94104

Phone: (415) 288-4545

Fax: (415) 288-4534

Email: shawnw@rgrdlaw.com

Michael I. Fistel, Jr. 

Johnson & Weaver, LLP

40 Powder Springs Street

Marietta, GA 30064 

Phone: (770) 200-3104

Fax: (770) 200-3101 

Email: michaelf@johnsonandweaver.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Rene Van Meerbeke

Dated: March 16, 2016 STULL, STULL & BRODY

By: /s/ Patrice L. Bishop

Patrice L. Bishop

9430 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 400

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Phone: (310) 209-2468

Fax: (310) 209-2087

Email: pbishop@ssbla.com

Thomas J. McKenna 

Gregory M. Egleston

GAINEY McKENNA & EGLESTON

440 Park Avenue South, 5th Floor

New York, NY 10016 

Phone: (212) 983-1300

Fax: (212) 983-0383 

Email: tjmckenna@gme-law.com

 gegleston@gme-law.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Majesty Palms, LLLP

Case 3:16-cv-00845-JST Document 12 Filed 03/17/16 Page 7 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND AND 

CONTINUING CMC 6

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00232 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00338 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00598 JST 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00845 JST 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LAW

SAN FRA N CI S CO

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), all signatories concur in filing this stipulation.

Dated: March 16, 2016 FENWICK & WEST LLP

By: /s/ Catherine D. Kevane 

 Catherine D. Kevane 

555 California Street, 12th Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

Phone: (415) 875-2300

Fax: (415) 281-1350

Attorneys for Defendants

GoPro, Inc., Nicholas Woodman,

Jack Lazar, and Anthony Bates

* * *

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 17, 2016

Hon. Jon S. Tigar

United States District Court Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:16-cv-00845-JST Document 12 Filed 03/17/16 Page 8 of 8