Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01782/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01782-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GABRIEL RODRIGUEZ, ) 1:06-cv-01782 GSA

)

Plaintiff, ) ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

) EXTENSION OF TIME

)

) (Document 28)

 vs. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, )

)

) 

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

On February 28, 2008, Defendant filed a motion and proposed order to extend time for filing

his response to Plaintiff’s opening brief to March 14, 2008. Defendant explains that the extension is

sought on the grounds that the workload of his legal counsel is extremely heavy due to staffing

shortages and that his counsel is scheduled for a hearing in early March, which cannot be delayed

and which requires extensive preparation. Defendant represents that he met and conferred with

Plaintiff’s counsel’s office by telephone, and was advised it does not oppose the motion. As the

motion for an extension of time is unopposed and good cause appearing, Defendant’s motion is

GRANTED. 

This is Defendant’s third request for an extension of time to file his response to Plaintiff’s

opening brief. Further requests will not be granted absent a showing of good cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 1:06-cv-01782-GSA Document 29 Filed 02/28/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Dated: February 28, 2008 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

60kij8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01782-GSA Document 29 Filed 02/28/08 Page 2 of 2