Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-05093/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-05093-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT CHARLES JORDAN, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GREENAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:99-cv-05093-REC-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 102)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 94) AND

DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff, Robert Charles Jordan, Jr. (“plaintiff”), a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this

civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On September 13, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fifteen (15)

days. On September 29, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion to extend

time. On October 27, 2005, the court granted plaintiff an

Case 1:99-cv-05093-REC -SMS Document 109 Filed 03/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

additional thirty (30) days within which to respond. However, on

November 28, 2005, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address.

Therefore, on December 9, 2005, the court granted plaintiff an

additional thirty (30) days within which to respond. To date,

the parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 13,

2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed February

15, 2005, is GRANTED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for

defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:99-cv-05093-REC -SMS Document 109 Filed 03/03/06 Page 2 of 2