Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00198/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00198-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff,

v.

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et

al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 06-0198 JW (PVT)

INTERIM ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO COMPEL

On September 29, 2006, Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel, failed to file copies of the actual

discovery requests at issue.1 Having reviewed the papers submitted by the parties, the court finds it

appropriate to issue this interim order. Based on the briefs and arguments presented,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than 9:00 a.m. on October 17, 2006, Plaintiffs shall

file declarations with copies of the disputed discovery requests attached. This court’s Civil Local

Rule 7-5(a) provides:

“(a) Affidavit or Declaration Required. Factual contentions made in support of or

in opposition to any motion must be supported by an affidavit or declaration and by

appropriate references to the record. Extracts from depositions, interrogatory answers,

requests for admission and other evidentiary matters must be appropriately

Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW Document 57 Filed 10/16/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

authenticated by an affidavit or declaration.”

Plaintiffs are cautioned that in the future any failure to file copies of disputed discovery

requests will likely result in summary denial of the motion to compel.

Dated: 10/16/06

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW Document 57 Filed 10/16/06 Page 2 of 2