Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00086/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00086-58/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRYAN E. RANSOM,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00086-OWW-GSA PC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING

ORDER

(Doc. 211)

PLAINTIFF DIRECTING TO FILE RESPONSE

TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. 213)

This civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Plaintiff Bryan E. Ransom, a

state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On July 29, 2009, Defendants filed a motion

seeking to modify the scheduling orderto allow them to file a second motion for summary judgment.

Good cause having been shown, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order to file a second motion for

summary judgment is GRANTED, nunc pro tunc to October 29, 2009;

2. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’

October 29 motion for summary judgment within thirty days from the date of service

of this order; and

///

///

///

1

Case 1:05-cv-00086-OWW -GSA Document 216 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. If Plaintiff needs additional time to file a response, he shall file a motion seeking an

extension of time prior to the expiration of the thirty day deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 8, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:05-cv-00086-OWW -GSA Document 216 Filed 02/08/10 Page 2 of 2