Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02912/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02912-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ABBYY SOFTWARE HOUSE, et al.

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 08-2912 JSW (MEJ)

DISCOVERY ORDER RE DKT. #180 

On February 23, 2010, the Court held a telephonic conference regarding the discovery

disputes presented in the parties’ joint discovery dispute letters, filed January 28, 2010 (Dkt. #171),

and February 2, 2010 (Dkt. #172). Pursuant to discussions at February 23 hearing, the Court

ordered Defendant ABBYY USA Software House, Inc. (“ABBYY USA”) to submit a formal written

request to the Russian entity ABBYY Production, requesting that it produce the disputed source

code to ABBYY USA under the terms of the licensing agreement between the two entities. (Dkt.

#179.) The parties are now before the Court because they are unable to reach an agreement

regarding the language of the letter, and each party has filed a proposed letter for the Court’s

consideration. (Dkt. #180.) 

Plaintiff Nuance Communications, Inc. (“Nuance”) argues that ABBYY USA’s version of

the request, where it states that “ABBYY USA has informed Nuance and the Court that ABBYY

USA lacks the ability to obtain the Source Code through the Software License Agreement,” makes

the request pointless, arguing that ABBYY USA baldly states that it neither wants the source code

nor believes it has the rights to it. (Dkt. #180, Ex. B.) Nuance contends that this is not a good faith

effort to request the source code under the terms of the licensing agreement between ABBYY USA

and ABBYY Production. 

Case 3:08-cv-02912-JSW Document 181 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 2
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

In response, ABBYY USA argues that it “simply wishes to convey the nature of the dispute

in which ABBYY USA does not believe it has a right to the source code and Nuance believes

ABBYY USA does under the terms of the license agreement.” (Dkt. #180.) ABBYY USA contends

that its draft incorporates Nuance’s position in full and makes clear that it is Nuance’s position.

Upon review of the parties’ arguments, the Court agrees with Nuance. Specifically, if the

letter includes the statement that ABBYY USA “lacks the ability to obtain the Source Code through

the Software License Agreement” this defeats any good faith request for the source code under the

terms of the license agreement. This is especially true as phrased in ABBYY USA’s letter, where it

states that it is unable to obtain the source code, and then states that its adversary argues that it can. 

Such language is unnecessary. Accordingly, the Court approves Nuance’s version of the letter. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2010

_______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-02912-JSW Document 181 Filed 03/03/10 Page 2 of 2