Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_12-cv-00867/USCOURTS-almd-2_12-cv-00867-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

RANDY J. RICHBURG, #240 472, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

 v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-867-TMH

) [WO]

GOV. ROBERT BENTLEY, )

)

Defendant. )

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 19, 2012, the court entered an order granting Plaintiff fourteen days to

file an amended complaint. (See Doc. No. 9.) Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to

comply with the court’s order would result in a Recommendation that his complaint be

dismissed. (Id.) The requisite time has passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the orders

of the court. Consequently, the court concludes that dismissal of this case is appropriate for

Plaintiff’s failures to prosecute this action and comply with the orders of the court.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case

be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failures to prosecute this action and comply

with the orders of this court.

It is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff may file an objection to the Recommendation on or before 

February 15, 2013. Any objection filed must specifically identify the findings in the

Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which Plaintiff objects. Frivolous, conclusive or

general objections will not be considered by the District Court. Plaintiff is advised that this

Case 2:12-cv-00867-TMH-SRW Document 10 Filed 02/01/13 Page 1 of 2
Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore, it is not appealable.

Failure to file a written objection to the proposed findings and recommendations in

the Magistrate Judge's report shall bar Plaintiff from a de novo determination by the District

Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar Plaintiff from attacking on appeal factual

findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain

error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5 Cir. 1982). See Stein th

v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11 Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of th

Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11 Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the th

decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on

September 30, 1981.

DONE, this 1 day of February, 2013. st

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:12-cv-00867-TMH-SRW Document 10 Filed 02/01/13 Page 2 of 2