Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04330/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04330-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS/CERTIFICATION C07-04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL J. BERGESON, Bar No. 105439

dbergeson@be-law.com

JOHN W. FOWLER, Bar No. 037463

jfowler@be-law.com

MELINDA M. MORTON, Bar No. 209373

mmorton@be-law.com

BERGESON, LLP

303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500

San Jose, CA 95110-2712

Telephone: (408) 291-6200

Facsimile: (408) 297-6000

Attorneys for Plaintiff

VERIGY US, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

VERIGY US, INC, a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ROMI OMAR MAYDER, an individual;

WESLEY MAYDER, an individual; SILICON

TEST SYSTEMS, INC., a California Corporation;

and SILICON TEST SOLUTIONS, LLC, a

California Limited Liability Corporation,

inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. C07 04330 RMW (HRL)

STIPULATION SELECTING ADR

PROCESS [ADR L.R. 3-5]

Judge: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

Complaint Filed: August 22, 2007

Trial Date: None Set

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 129 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 7

AND ORDER *E-FILED - 12/12/07*

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 139 Filed 12/12/07 Page 1 of 7
1

STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS/CERTIFICATION C07-04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.

The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process:

Private Process:

_X_ Private ADR (mutually agreeable private mediator to conduct mediation)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by

_X_ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring

the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

Private Process:

_X_ Private ADR (mutually agreeable private mediator to conduct mediation after parties

have engaged in document discovery)

(For e-filers, please consult General Order No. 45, Section X regarding signatures.)

Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories

Dated: November 19, 2007 /s/ Melinda M. Morton

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: November 21, 2007 /s/ Kevin Pasquinelli

Attorney for Defendants

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 139 Filed 12/12/07 Page 2 of 7
2

STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS/CERTIFICATION C07-04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 16 and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), the undersigned certifies that he has read

either the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of

California,” on the Court’s ADR Internet site <www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov>, discussed the

available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities, and considered

whether this case might benefit from any of them.

Dated: November 19, 2007 /s/

Kenneth M. Siegel for Plaintiff Verigy US, Inc.

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 139 Filed 12/12/07 Page 3 of 7
3

STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS/CERTIFICATION C07-04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 16 and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), the undersigned certifies that he or she has

read either the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of

California,” on the Court’s ADR Internet site <www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov>, discussed the

available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities, and considered

whether this case might benefit from any of them.

Dated: November 19, 2007 /s/

Melinda M. Morton, Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 139 Filed 12/12/07 Page 4 of 7
4

STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS/CERTIFICATION C07-04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 16 and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), the undersigned certifies that he or she has

read either the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of

California,” on the Court’s ADR Internet site <www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov>, discussed the

available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities, and considered

whether this case might benefit from any of them.

Dated: November 21, 2007 /s/

Romi Mayder for Defendants

Romi Mayder, Silicon Test Systems, Inc.

and Silicon Test Solutions, LLC

Dated: December 4, 2007 /s/

Wesley Mayder for Defendant

Wesley Mayder

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 139 Filed 12/12/07 Page 5 of 7
5

STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS/CERTIFICATION C07-04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 16 and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), the undersigned certifies that he or she has

read either the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of

California,” on the Court’s ADR Internet site <www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov>, discussed the

available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities, and considered

whether this case might benefit from any of them.

Dated: November 21, 2007 /s/

Daniel S. Mount, Counsel for Defendants

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 139 Filed 12/12/07 Page 6 of 7
6

STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS/CERTIFICATION C07-04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[] ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation Selecting ADR Process submitted by the parties, the

captioned matter is hereby referred to private mediation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________ _______________________________________

HON. JUDGE RONALD M. WHYTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12/12/07

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 139 Filed 12/12/07 Page 7 of 7