Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04525/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04525-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT, Case No. 3:15-cv-04525-EMC 

 Page 1 

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 

David E. Sipiora (SBN 124951) 

Kristopher L. Reed (SBN 235518) 

Matthew C. Holohan (SBN 239040) 

1400 Wewatta St., Suite 600 

Denver, CO 80202 

Telephone: (303) 571-4000 

Facsimile: (303) 571-4321 

Email: dsipiora@kilpatricktownsend.com 

kreed@kilpatricktownsend.com 

 mholohan@kilpatricktownsend.com 

Robert J. Artuz (SBN 227789) 

Eighth Floor, Two Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 273-4713 

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 

Email: rartuz@kilpatricktownsend.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP 

(SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS 

COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 3:15-CV-04525-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL 

DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT 

Case 3:15-cv-04525-EMC Document 211 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT, Case No. 3:15-cv-04525-EMC 

 Page 2 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Avago Technologies 

General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“Avago”) and Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS 

Computer International (collectively, “ASUS”) hereby stipulate through their respective counsel 

of record as follows: 

All parties stipulate to dismissal with prejudice of Count 3 of the First Amended 

Complaint for Patent Infringement (“First Amended Complaint”) against ASUS pertaining to 

infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,188,835 (the “’835 Patent”). Specifically, the parties stipulate 

to dismissal of Count 3 with respect to ASUS Model No. M11BB-B07 that was identified in the 

First Amended Complaint and Plaintiff’s First Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and 

Infringement Contentions Under Patent L.R. 3. 

For the avoidance of doubt, the First Amended Complaint remains operative with respect 

to all remaining Counts, namely, Counts 1, 2, and 4-8. 

Dated: July 1, 2016 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 

By: /s/David E. Sipiora 

 David E. Sipiora 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Avago Technologies General 

IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. 

Dated: July 1, 2016 ALSTON & BIRD, LLP 

By: /s/Michael J. Newton Michael J. Newton 

Attorneys for Defendants ASUSTeK Computer Inc. 

and ASUS Computer International

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-04525-EMC Document 211 Filed 07/05/16 Page 2 of 2