Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03555/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03555-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MATT GONZALEZ (SBN 153486)

G. WHITNEY LEIGH (SBN 153457) 

BRYAN W. VERESCHAGIN (SBN 188608)

GONZALEZ & LEIGH, LLP 

Two Shaw Alley, Third Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 512-2000 

Fax: (415) 512-2001 

JIVAKA CANDAPPA (SBN 225919) 

5111 Telegraph Avenue, #215 

Oakland, CA 94609 

Telephone: (510) 654-4129 

Fax: (510) 594-9610 

Attorneys for Plaintiff STANCY NESBY 

JOHN A. RUSSO, City Attorney - State Bar #129729 

RANDOLPH W. HALL, Chief Assistant City Attorney - State Bar #080142 

RACHEL WAGNER, Supervising Trial Attorney - State Bar #127246 

PELAYO A. LLAMAS, JR., Deputy City Attorney - State Bar #162046 

One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 238-6621 Fax: (510) 238-6500 

23952/384425

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF OAKLAND and 

OFFICER JAMES ANDERSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STANCY NESBY, an Individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

THE CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C-05-03555-JL 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

Plaintiff STANCY NESBY, and her attorneys BRYAN W. VERESCHAGIN, 

ESQ. individually and on behalf of The Law Office of GONZALEZ & LEIGH, LLP, JIVAKA 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 1 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 1 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

CANDAPPA, ESQ., individually and on behalf of The Law Office of JIVAKA CANDAPPA, 

and Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND and JAMES ANDERSON by and through their 

attorney PELAYO A. LLAMAS, JR., Deputy City Attorney of the OAKLAND CITY 

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, hereby stipulate to the following protective order:

 1. DEFINITIONS

 1.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 

employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff). 

 1.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 

the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 

testimony, transcripts, or other tangible things) that are produced or generated in 

disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter; 

 1.3 “Confidential” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things qualify for protection under standards 

developed under F.R.Civ.P. 26(c). This material includes, but is not limited to: 

a) Information contained in and copies of certain personnel files 

for OFFICER JAMES ANDERSON for a period covering the dates of his employment with 

the Oakland Police Department through the present date pursuant to Plaintiff’s 

Interrogatories, Set One and Request for Production of Documents, Set One, to the City 

and to Officer James Anderson. 

b) Information contained in and copies of certain internal affairs 

files pertaining to complaints about OFFICER JAMES ANDERSON or any other officer of 

the Oakland Police Department for a period September 4, 1998 through the present 

pursuant to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories, Set One and Request for Production of Documents, 

Set One, to the City and to Officer James Anderson. 

c) Internal Affairs File 04-258 pertaining to the subject incident 

which forms the basis of this matter. 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 2 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 2 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 3 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

d) Any deposition testimony given that relates to information 

contained in the internal affairs or personnel files of OFFICER JAMES ANDERSON and 

any other police officer or employee that is covered any right to privacy under applicable 

law.

e) Any other information contained in or documents produced 

pursuant to discovery in this case designated as “Highly Confidential” or “Confidential.” 

 1.4 “Highly Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or “Confidential”

Information or Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” whose 

disclosure to another Party or non-party would create a substantial risk of serious injury 

that could not be avoided by less restrictive means.

 1.5 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 

Material from a Producing Party. 

 1.6 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or 

Discovery Material in this action. 

 1.7. Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or 

items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential-Attorneys Eyes Only.” 

 1.8. Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 

designated as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

 1.9. Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but 

who are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 

 1.10. House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. 

 1.11 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as 

well as their support staffs). 

 1.12. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a 

matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 3 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 3 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 4 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

as an expert witness or as an consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current 

employee of a Party and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an 

employee of a Party. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained 

in connection with this litigation. 

 1.13 Professional Vendors: person or entities that provide litigation support 

services (e.g., photocopying: videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or 

demonstrations; organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their 

employees and subcontractors. 

2. SCOPE

 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 

Protected Material (as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted 

therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus 

testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or counsel to or in court or in other 

settings that might reveal Protected Material. 

 3. DURATION

 Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 

imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in 

writing or court order otherwise directs. 

 4. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

4.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.

Each Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection 

under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 

qualifies under the appropriate standards. A Designating Party must take care to 

designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written 

communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or

/ / / 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 4 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 4 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 5 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the 

ambit of this Order. 

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations 

that are shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose 

(e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose 

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties), expose the Designating Party to 

sanctions.

If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items 

that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the 

level of protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other 

parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 

 4.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in 

this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 4.2(a), below), or as otherwise 

stipulated or ordered, material that qualified for protection under the Order must be clearly 

so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 

 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 

 (a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions 

or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” at the top of 

each page that contains protected material. 

 A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for 

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has 

indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and 

before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has 

identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 5 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 5 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 6 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, 

then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the 

appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY”) at the top of each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or 

portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 

clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 

margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted (either 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). 

 (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, 

that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, 

before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, 

and further specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ ONLY.” When it is impractical to identify separately each 

portion of testimony that is entitled to protection, the Party or non-party that sponsors, 

offers, or gives the testimony may invoke on the record (before the deposition or 

proceeding ins concluded) a right to have up to 20 days to identify the specify the level of 

protection being asserted (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately 

designated for protection within the 20 days shall be covered by the provisions of this 

Stipulated Protective Order. 

 Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by 

the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as 

instructed by the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the 

testimony.

/ / / 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 6 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 6 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 7 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

 ( c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for 

any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior 

of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

 4.3. Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent 

failure to designate qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating 

Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. If material is 

appropriately designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only” 

after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the 

designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in 

accordance with the provisions of the Order. 

 5. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

 5.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a proper challenge to a Designating 

Party’s confidentially designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, 

unnecessary economic burden, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a 

Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to 

mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 

 5.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a 

Designating Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the 

process by conferring directly with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the 

challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation 

was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the 

designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is 

offered, to explain the basis for the chose designation. A challenging Party may

/ / / 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 7 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 7 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 8 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and 

confer process first. 

 5.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a 

confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating 

Party may file and serve a motion under Civil Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local 

Rule 79-5, if applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the 

basis for the challenge. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent 

declaration that affirms that the movant has complied with the meet and confer 

requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that sets forth with specificity the 

justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating Party in 

the meet and confer dialogue. 

 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the 

Designating Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to 

afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the 

Producing Party’s designation. 

 6. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

 6.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 

disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only 

for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected material 

may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in 

this Order. When the litigation has terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the 

provisions of section 10, below (FINAL DISPOSITION). 

 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 

location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 

authorized under this Order. 

/ / / 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 8 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 8 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 9 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

 6.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL: Information or Items. Unless

otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 

Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to: 

 (a) employees of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably 

necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (b) experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement 

to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (c) the Court and its personnel; 

 (d) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure 

is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have sighed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (e) during their deposition, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective 

Order” (Exhibit A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions 

that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not 

be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order. 

 (f) the author the document or the original source of the information. 

 6.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”

Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the 

Designating Party, Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 

 (a) Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably 

necessary for this litigation, who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective 

Order” (Exhibit A); 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 9 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 9 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 10 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

 (b) the Court and it’s personnel; 

 (c) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure 

is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have sighed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and 

 (d) the author of the document or the original source of the information. 

 7. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED 

 PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION________________

 If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other 

litigation that would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action 

as “CONFIDENTIAL” or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the 

Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) 

immediately and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or 

order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order. 

 The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who 

caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material 

covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the 

Receiving Party must deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the 

Party in the other action that caused the subpoena or order to issue. 

 The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the 

existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designation Party in this case an 

opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the 

subpoena or order issued. The Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the 

expenses of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material—and nothing in 

these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in 

this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 

 8. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 10 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 10 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 11 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under 

this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing 

the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all 

copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized 

disclosures were made of all of the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or 

persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached 

hereto as Exhibit A. 

 9. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL. Without written permission form the 

Designating Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested 

persons, a Party may not in the public record in this action any Protected material. A 

Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local 

Rule 79-5. In addition to placing the documents in a sealed envelope with instructions that 

the envelope is not to be opened absent further order of the court, the envelope should be 

labeled to identify title of the case, the case number, and the title of the document. 

 10. FINAL DISPOSITION. Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by 

the Producing Party, within thirty (30) days after the final termination of this action (defined 

as the dismissal or entry of judgment by the district court, or if an appeal is filed, the 

disposition of the appeal), each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the 

Producing Party, as used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, 

abstracts compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of 

the Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating Party, the 

Receiving Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead or returning it. 

Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit 

a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the 

Designating Party) by the thirty day deadline that identifies (by category, where 

appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 11 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 11 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or 

other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding 

this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion 

papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if 

such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or 

constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 

4 (DURATION), above. 

 11. MISCELLANEOUS

 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 

person to seek its modification by the Court in the future.

 12. JURISDICTION. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over any matter 

covered by this Stipulation and Order for 24 months after the final termination of this 

action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: September 15, 2006 GONZALEZ & LEIGH, LLP 

 By://s//BRYAN W. VERESCHAGIN 

 BRYAN W. VERESCHAGIN, ESQ. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 Stancy Nesby 

DATED: September 29, 2006 

 //s//JIVAKA CANDAPPA 

 JIVAKA CANDAPPA, ESQ. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 Stancy Nesby 

DATED: September 29, 2006 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 12 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 12 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

 By://s//PELAYO A. LLAMAS, JR. 

 PELAYO A. LLAMAS, JR. 

 Deputy City Attorney 

Attorneys for Defendants 

City of Oakland and Officer James Anderson 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________

 ___________________________________ 

 JAMES LARSON 

 Chief Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 13 of 14

OCTOBER 4, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Larson

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 13 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 C-05-03555-JL

RE: INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 

PERSONNEL FILES 

EXHIBIT A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

 I, __________________________[print or type full name], of 

________________________________[print or type full address], declare under penalty 

of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order 

that was issued by the United States Court for the Northern District of California on 

______________________[date] in the case of Stancy Nesby v. The City of Oakland, et 

al., Case No. C-05-03555-JL. I agree to comply with and be bound by all the terms of this 

Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply 

could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly 

promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this 

Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the 

provisions of this Order. 

 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District for the 

Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated 

Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this 

action.

 I hereby appoint_______________________________[print or type full 

name] of ___________________________________________[print or type full address 

and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with 

this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

Date:_____________________

City and State where sworn and signed:___________________________ 

Printed name:_______________________________ 

 [printed name] 

Signature:_________________________________

 [signature} 

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 42 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 14 of 14 Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 43 Filed 10/04/06 Page 14 of 14