Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01889/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01889-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRUCE W. NICKERSON, 

Plaintiff,

 v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C-10-01889 EDL

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION

FOR CONTINUANCE

On July 13, 2010, the Wells Fargo Bank Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s

Class Action Complaint, which was set for hearing on August 31, 2010. On August 6, 2010,

Plaintiff Nickerson, who is also co-counsel of record in this case, filed a Motion for Continuance,

seeking to continue the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss to October 21 or 28, 2010 because

Plaintiff will be out of the country from August 26 through October 4, 2010. See Nickerson Decl. ¶

2; Ex. A. On August 9, 2010, the Wells Fargo Defendants filed a Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for

Continuance. Defendants do not oppose a continuance, but they propose an earlier hearing date of

October 12, 2010. 

Good case appearing, Plaintiff’s Motion for Continuance is granted in part. The hearing on

the Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for October 12, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff shall file his

opposition to the Motion to Dismiss no later than August 25, 2010. Defendant shall file a reply no

later than September 8, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2010 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:10-cv-01889-EDL Document 26 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 1