Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01733/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01733-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 140
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Dennis Campbell, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Freddie Mac, et. al, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 10-1733-PHX-MHM

AMENDED ORDER

The Court previously directed Plaintiff Dennis Campbell to respond to Defendants

Sunrise Bank of Arizona and Neil Barna's motion to dismiss by November 8, 2010 and

informed him that failure to response would lead the court to grant the motion. Plaintiff

did not file a response. Pursuant to LR. Civ. 7.2(i) "if the opposing party does not serve

and file the required answering memoranda...such non-compliance may be deemed a

consent to the denial or granting of the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion

summarily." See also Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 652 (9th Cir. 1994). 

The Court previously entered an order granting Defendants' motions, but erred by

referring to one of the Defendants as Sunrise Bank of America rather than Sunrise Bank 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:10-cv-01733-RRB Document 18 Filed 12/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

of Arizona. (Doc. 17) For this reason, the Court issues this amended order correcting this

error.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendants Sunrise Bank of Arizona and

Neil Barna's Motion for Summary Disposition (doc. 10) seeking a ruling on the Motion to

Dismiss, which was filed in the Maricopa County Superior Court on August 6, 2010

before the case was removed to federal court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendants Sunrise Bank of Arizona and

Neil Barna's Motion to Dismiss.

DATED this 14th day of December, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-01733-RRB Document 18 Filed 12/21/10 Page 2 of 2