Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00069/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00069-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC 

Harrison J. Frahn IV (Bar No. 206822) 

hfrahn@stblaw.com 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 251-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 

Attorney for Defendant Light In The Box Limited 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

E & E CO., LTD., a California corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

LIGHT IN THE BOX LIMITED, a Hong 

Kong corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC 

Judge Edward M. Chen 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Second Amended Complaint Filed: 

October 14, 2015 

Current CMC Date: December 10, 2015 

Plaintiff E & E Co., Ltd. (“Plaintiff” or “E & E”) and Defendant Light In The Box 

Limited (“Defendant” or “LITB Limited”) (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate to (1) a one 

month continuance of the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) (and all dates associated 

therewith), currently set for December 10, 2015, to a date available with the Court after January 4, 

2016, and (2) an eighteen (18) day extension of Defendant LITB Limited’s time to answer, move 

against, or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint from November 13, 2015, to and 

including December 1, 2015. The Parties’ stipulation is based on the following facts: 

1. Plaintiff E & E filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) in the above 

captioned case against Defendant LITB Limited on October 14, 2015 (Dkt. No. 60); 

Case 3:15-cv-00069-EMC Document 67 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC

2. The Parties conferred and jointly stipulated to enlarge the time for LITB Limited to 

respond to the SAC to thirty (30) days, to and including November 13, 2015 (Dkt. No. 59); 

3. The Parties have since been in settlement discussions and would like time to 

continue their settlement talks before taking the time and expense of responding to the SAC, filing 

a Joint CMC statement, and preparing for and attending the CMC; 

4. The Parties submit that this agreement was made in the spirit of conserving judicial 

resources and is in the best interests of the Parties; 

5. The Parties, therefore, respectfully request that: (1) the CMC scheduled for 

December 10, 2015 be continued to a date convenient for the Court after January 4, 2016, (along 

with all dates associated therewith); (2) the date for filing the Joint CMC Statement be continued 

until one week before the new CMC date (along with all dates associated therewith); and (3) 

Defendant LITB Limited’s time to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the SAC be 

extended from November 13, 2015, to and including December 1, 2015. 

Dated: November 10, 2015 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV 

Harrison J. Frahn IV 

 hfrahn@stblaw.com 

 Attorney for Defendant, Light In The Box Limited

 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 

By: /s/ John Shaeffer 

John Shaeffer 

jshaeffer@foxrothschild.com 

Ashe Puri 

apuri@foxrothschild.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, E & E CO., LTD. 

Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing 

of this document has been obtained from the signatories to this document. 

Case 3:15-cv-00069-EMC Document 67 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued from December 10, 2015, 

until _____________, 2016; 

2. All other deadlines associated with the Case Management Conference shall be 

continued, accordingly, including the filing of a Joint Case Management Conference statement, 

which shall be continued until one week before the new CMC date. The Parties shall comply with 

this Court’s Standing Order re: Initial Case Management and the Standing Order for All Judges of 

the Northern District of California re: Contents of Case Management Statements. 

3. Defendant LITB Limited’s time to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to 

the Second Amended Complaint is extended by 18 days, from November 13, 2015, to and 

including December 1, 2015. 

Dated: November ___, 2015 _________________________________ 

 Hon. Edward M. Chen, 

 United States District Judge 

January 21 at 9:30 a.m. 16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00069-EMC Document 67 Filed 11/16/15 Page 3 of 3