Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-02068/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-02068-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Alberto Villescas is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to the 

jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 34; Local Rule 302.

On September 3, 2015, Defendants filed a third motion to modify the scheduling order. (ECF 

No. 55.) The Court granted Defendants’ motion on September 4, 2015, and extended the dispositive 

motion deadline by seven days, i.e. September 10, 2015. (ECF No. 56.) In that order, the Court noted 

that no further extensions of time would be granted, absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances, 

not present therein. (Id.) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on September 10, 2015. 

(ECF No. 57.) 

On November 4, 2015, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ third motion to modify the 

scheduling order. (ECF No. 65.) Plaintiff contends that he been prejudiced and will be further 

prejudiced by an extension of the dispositive motion deadline. (Id.) 

ALBERTO VILLESCAS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

M.T. DOTSON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-02068-SAB (PC)

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S 

OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST 

TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

[ECF No. 65]

Case 1:12-cv-02068-SAB Document 67 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Inasmuch as Defendants’ presented good cause for a short extension of the dispositive motion 

deadline and filed a motion for summary judgment by the extended deadline, i.e. September 10, 2015, 

Plaintiff’s objections to Defendants’ third motion for an extension of time is OVERRULED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 5, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-02068-SAB Document 67 Filed 11/05/15 Page 2 of 2