Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02052/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02052-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Teresa S. Renaker – CA State Bar No. 187800

Margaret E. Hasselman – CA State Bar No. 228529

Kirsten Scott – CA State Bar No. 253464

RENAKER HASSELMAN LLP

235 Montgomery Street, Suite 944

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 653-1733

Facsimile: (415) 727-5079 

teresa@renakerhasselman.com

margo@renakerhasselman.com

kirsten@renakerhasselman.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION

BUZ NAY AXLINE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA and CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE

WEST LONG-TERM DISABILITY BENEFIT

PLAN,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:16-cv-02052-RS

STIPULATION FOR DISPOSITIVE

MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE;

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

WHEREAS, at the initial case management conference held September 1, 2016, the

Court directed the parties to agree on a briefing schedule for dispositive motions; and

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed on a schedule;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate to the following briefing schedule: 

Plaintiff’s motion filed: December 22, 2016

Defendants’ cross-motion and opposition (one brief) filed: January 12, 2017

Plaintiff’s opposition and reply (one brief) filed: January 26, 2017

Defendants’ reply filed: February 9, 2017

Hearing: February 23, 2017, 1:30 p.m.

Case 3:16-cv-02052-RS Document 34 Filed 09/14/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SO STIPULATED:

Dated: September 9, 2016 RENAKER HASSELMAN LLP

By: /s/ Teresa S. Renaker 

Teresa S. Renaker

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: September 9, 2016 RIMAC MARTIN APC

By: /s/ Anna M. Martin 

Anna M. Martin

Attorneys for Defendants

ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document

has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 

/s/ Teresa S. Renaker

Teresa S. Renaker

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________, 2016 _____________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

PAGE 2

9/14

Case 3:16-cv-02052-RS Document 34 Filed 09/14/16 Page 2 of 2