Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01943/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01943-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CV04-7943 RMW

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

JESSICA A. DAYTON (State Bar #231698)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JAREK MOLSKI 

and DISABILITY RIGHTS 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION 

SERVICES: HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK MOLSKI, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES:HELPING

YOU HELP OTHERS, a California public

benefit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KING & I INVESTMENT GROUP, a

California corporation and DELORES M.

WEST and ELAINE C. WEST,

individually and as trustees of the

WILLIAM M. & DELORES M. WEST

REVOCABLE TRUST, 

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-1943 RMW

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of

this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms

of the Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own

costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511

U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of

settlement agreements).

*E-FILED - 10/21/05*

AND ORDER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CV04-7943 RMW 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

DATED: October 12, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: _________/s/__________________________

JESSICA A. DAYTON

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS

DATED: October 12, 2005 HINKLE, JACHIMOWICZ, POINTER & MAYRON

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

By: ________/s/___________________________

GERALD A. EMANUEL

Attorneys for Defendants KING & I

INVESTMENT GROUP, a California corporation

DATED: October 13, 2005 BERLINER COHEN

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

By: ________/s/___________________________

LAURA A. PALAZZOLO

Attorneys for Defendants DELORES M. WEST and

ELAINE C. WEST, individually and as trustees of

the WILLIAM M. & DELORES M. WEST

REVOCABLE TRUST

///

///

///

///

///
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CV04-7943 RMW 3

O R D E R 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

DATED: ________________, 2005

______________________________________________

HON. RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Court Judge

10/21

/S/ RONALD M. WHYTE