Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923-96/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE: HEARING ON MAGMA’S STAY MOTION

Case No. C04-03923 MMC-JS

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) – griley@omm.com

MARK E. MILLER (S.B. #130200) – markmiller@omm.com

PETER OBSTLER (S.B. #171623) – pobstler@omm.com 

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO (S.B. #208606) – ccatalano@omm.com

LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) – lsimmons@omm.com

NORA M. PUCKETT (pro hac vice) – npuckett@omm.com 

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

Plaintiff and CounterDefendant,

v.

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC., 

a Delaware Corporation 

Defendant and 

Counterclaimant. 

Case No. C04-03923 MMC-JS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATE 

FOR MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, 

INC.’S MOTION TO STAY 

[Civil L.R. 6-1(a), 7-7(b)] 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 1193 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE: HEARING ON MAGMA’S STAY MOTION

Case No. C04-03923 MMC-JS

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) and 7-7(b), it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff 

and Counterclaim-defendant Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant and Counterclaimplaintiff Magma Design Automation, Inc. (“Magma”) as follows: 

WHEREAS, Magma filed a motion to stay on January 29, 2007, and noticed that motion 

for hearing on March 9, 2007 (“Magma’s Stay Motion”); 

WHEREAS, the Court issued its Memorandum of Decision; Findings of Fact and 

Conclusions of Law Re: Patent Ownership on January 31, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Synopsys filed a motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 

59(e) on February 14, 2007, and noticed that motion for hearing on March 23, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Magma filed a motion for reconsideration on February 16, 2007, and noticed 

that motion for hearing on March 23, 2007 (“Magma’s Reconsideration Motion”); 

WHEREAS, Magma wishes to have Magma’s Stay Motion heard on or after the date that 

Magma’s Reconsideration Motion is heard because the Reconsideration Motion deals with 

threshold, jurisdictional issues; 

WHEREAS, Magma has requested, and Synopsys has agreed, to have Magma’s Stay 

Motion scheduled for hearing on March 23, 2007 rather than March 9, 2007; 

NOW, THEREFORE, Magma and Synopsys hereby stipulate and request as follows: 

1. The March 9, 2007 hearing date on Magma’s Stay Motion is vacated. 

2. The hearing, if any, on Magma’s Stay Motion is set for March 23, 2007 at 9:00 

a.m. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February 23, 2007 

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: Christopher D. Catalano 

 Christopher D. Catalano 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant MAGMA DESIGN 

AUTOMATION, INC.

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 1193 Filed 02/26/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE: HEARING ON MAGMA’S STAY MOTION

Case No. C04-03923 MMC-JS

Dated: February 23, 2007 

DECHERT LLP 

By: Chris Scott Graham 

 Chris Scott Graham 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant SYNOPSYS, INC.

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from counsel of record for Synopsys. 

Dated: February 23, 2007 

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: Christopher D. Catalano 

 Christopher D. Catalano 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant MAGMA DESIGN 

AUTOMATION, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

 HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SF1:662875.1

February 26, 2007

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 1193 Filed 02/26/07 Page 3 of 3