Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-310/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-03561 WHA

FOLLOW-UP ORDER

ON COMMENTS ON

TENTATIVE TRIAL PLAN

1. With regard to the timing of motions in limine, please use the thirty-five day schedule. 

Reply briefs will be allowed, but limited to five pages (no exhibits or declarations).

2. No précis is required for the six motions in limine, but the Court reserves the discretion

to postpone ruling on any premature motions.

3. Both sides may have one motion in limine that exceeds the ten-page limit, but the extra

pages must come out of the overall fifty-page limit. If a motion in limine is directed at

an expert report, then the entire expert report with exhibits must be submitted and none

of these pages will count against the one-hundred-page limit for supporting material.

4. By TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23 AT NOON, each side shall submit to the other a list of

twenty-five exhibits admitted in evidence at the 2012 trial that the submitting party

wishes to have admitted without objection in the upcoming trial. Within ONE WEEK

thereafter, both sides shall meet in person (not by email or telephone) and agree upon

the extent to which the twenty-five exhibits proposed by each side may be admitted

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1506 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

without restriction and submit a proposed stipulation. The Court has a hard time

believing that more than twenty-five exhibits per side are worth troubling over.

5. Marshmallow shall be added to the named versions of Android to be in play at the trial.

6. We will continue to bifurcate the trial. The Court will consider reallocating the twelve

and seven hour time limits at the final pretrial conference.

7. Oracle is incorrect in stating that in the damages stage only the parties’ damages experts

will be presented. Percipient testimony and exhibits may also be presented. Dr. Kearl

may also testify (although this decision will be made closer to the actual event).

8. The Court agrees that the equitable defenses phase should also include consideration of

Oracle’s equitable remedies, including its request for an injunction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1506 Filed 02/16/16 Page 2 of 2