Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-00896/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-00896-90/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, et al, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

JAMES C. CASTLE AKA J. CHRISTOPHER 

CASTLE, et al, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 11-CV-896 YGR

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF 

CROSS-CLAIMS OF PEARSON PROPERTIES, INC. DBA PRUDENTIAL CALIFORNIA REALTY 

TO CROSS-COMPLAINANT PEARSON PROPERTIES, INC. DBA PRUDENTIAL CALIFORNIA 

REALTY AND ITS COUNSEL OF RECORD:

You are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why your cross-complaint against cross-defendants 

Dabelich & Dabelich dba Round Up Realty, and Zelimir Dabelich should not be dismissed. You are 

directed to file a written response concerning the status of the claims and your plan for resolution of 

the claims no later than October 13, 2015. Failure to file a written response by that date will result in 

dismissal of your cross-claims against cross-defendants Dabelich & Dabelich dba Round Up Realty, 

and Zelimir Dabelich (collectively, “the Dabeliches”). 

The Court has issued two orders requiring cross-complainant Pearson Properties Inc. dba 

Prudential California Realty (“Prudential”) to update the Court as to the status of its cross-complaint 

against the Dabeliches. (Dkt. No. 819, 825.) Prudential has failed to respond to either order. 

Prudential sought and was granted entry of default as to the Dabeliches. (Dkt. Nos. 537, 540, 

547.) Zelimir Dabelich filed a “Notice of Conditional Acceptance and Offer to Settle” on November 

25, 2013. (Dkt. No. 556.) Prudential filed no response to that Notice. 

Case 4:11-cv-00896-YGR Document 859 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

Although Prudential has dismissed other cross-defendants (see Dkt. Nos. 790, 799), no 

dismissal or default judgment motion has been filed by Prudential as to the Dabeliches. Prudential 

has dismissed all other cross-defendants (see Dkt. Nos. 790, 799). 

Absent some indication that Prudential intends to pursue its claims against these defaulted 

cross-defendants, the Court will dismiss the cross-claims against the Dabeliches for failure to 

prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: September 23, 2015 

____________________________________ 

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00896-YGR Document 859 Filed 09/23/15 Page 2 of 2