Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00963/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00963-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Request to Extend All Deadlines for 90 Days (2:13-cv-963-EFB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

NAM BA NGUYEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA PRISON HEALTH 

SERVICE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:13-cv-963-EFB

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO EXTEND

ALL DEADLINES BY 90 DAYS 

PENDING PLAINTIFF’S RELOCATION 

AND RESOLUTION OF IMMIGRATION 

STATUS

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

Action Filed: 5/15/2013

This § 1983 action was filed by former prison inmate Plaintiff Nam Ba Nguyen against 

Defendants Dr. Osman, Nurse Sherman Champen, R.L Andreason, Nathanial Elam and California 

Prison Health Service on May 15, 2013. Plaintiff advises that he was paroled on September 8, 

2016, but that he was taken into custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and is 

currently trying to resolve his immigration status. Plaintiff has requested a 90 day stay of all 

currently pending deadlines, including the deadline to oppose Defendant Elam’s Motion to 

Dismiss (ECF 51). Defendants do not oppose the request, but ask that all deadlines be extended 

for 90 days. 

//

----------------

---------

Case 2:13-cv-00963-MCE-EFB Document 55 Filed 09/15/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Request to Extend All Deadlines for 90 Days (2:13-cv-963-EFB)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following will be the new schedule of deadlines in this 

matter:

Defendants’ deadline to complete discovery 12/16/2016

Plaintiff’s deadline to complete discovery 1/21/2017

Plaintiff’s deadline to amend the complaint 12/16/2016

Dispositive motions deadline 3/2/2017

Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose Defendant Elam’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 51) 12/27/2016

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until December 27, 2016 to file any 

opposition to Defendant Elam’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 51), and that Rule 230 (l) will continue 

to apply with respect to the motion.

DATED:_____________________ _____________________________

Hon. Edmund F. Brennan

U.S. Magistrate Judge

--------- September 15, 2016

Case 2:13-cv-00963-MCE-EFB Document 55 Filed 09/15/16 Page 2 of 2