Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00926/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00926-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada

corporation,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-926-PHX-SMM

ORDER

The Court has received and reviewed the Motion jointly filed by Plaintiff, the

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Defendant, AutoZone, Inc., entitled

“Joint Motion (1) For Ruling on Deposition Designation Objections without Video; or (2)

For Leave To Submit Videos In Unedited Form.” (Doc. 146) 

After reviewing the deposition designation objections filed with the parties’

Proposed Pretrial Order, the Court has determined that it can rule on the objections

without the aid of the deposition videotapes. Once the Court has ruled on the objections,

the parties will be notified so that edited versions of the videos can be obtained prior to

trial. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED GRANTING the Joint Motion (1) For Ruling on Deposition

Designation Objections without Video; or (2) For Leave To Submit Videos In Unedited

Form (Doc. 146).

Case 2:06-cv-00926-SMM Document 147 Filed 02/05/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

DATED this 4th day of February, 2009.

Case 2:06-cv-00926-SMM Document 147 Filed 02/05/09 Page 2 of 2