Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06353/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06353-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on Plaintiff on July 19, 2006, November 3, 1

2006, and December 18, 2006, as undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Out of

Custody. However, Plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a

party’s prior address is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LINDEN GRAHAM,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SULLIVAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-06353-AWI-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 46)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

ORDER DISREGARDING PENDING

MOTION TO DISMISS

(Doc. 43)

Linden Graham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding

pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On December 5, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which

contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. To

date, Plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:03-cv-06353-AWI-GSA Document 48 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 5,

2006, are ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED pursuant to Local Rule 11-110,

and for Plaintiff’s failure to obey the Court’s order of October

24, 2006, and for his failure to keep the Court apprised of his

mailing address; and,

3. The pending Motion to Dismiss, filed August 30, 2006, 

is DENIED AS MOOT in light of dismissal.

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in

accordance with this Order. 

This concludes the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06353-AWI-GSA Document 48 Filed 01/11/07 Page 2 of 2