Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01483/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01483-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

Matthew D. Mellen (Bar No. 233350) 

Jessica Galletta (Bar No. 281179) 

Eunji Cho (Bar No. 286710) 

MELLEN LAW FIRM 

411 Borel Avenue, Suite 230 

San Mateo, California 94402 

Telephone: (650) 638-0120 

Facsimile: (650) 638-0125 

Attorney for Plaintiffs, 

NATHAN TERRY 

GERALDINE TERRY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NATHAN TERRY, an individual; GERALDINE 

TERRY, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a business 

entity; U.S. BANK, N.A., a business entity; and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

 Defendants.

Case No.: 3:15-cv-01483-WHA

 

[Assigned to the Hon. William Alsup]

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 

COMPLAINT

Date: May 26, 2016

Time: 8:00 a.m.

Ctrm.: 8, 19th Floor

Complaint Filed: March 31, 2015

Plaintiffs NATHAN TERRY and GERALDINE TERRY (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and U.S. BANK, N.A. (“Defendants”), through their counsel of 

record, stipulate and agree as follows: 

RECITALS 

1. WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ 

Complaint, or in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement (Docket No. 21); 

2. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs need one additional day to file their Opposition to 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint;

3. WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate to extend Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their 

Case 3:15-cv-01483-WHA Document 25 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint by one day from May 2, 2016 

to May 3, 2016; 

4. WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate to extend Defendants’ deadline to file the Reply 

in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint by one day from May 9, 2016 

to May 10, 2016; 

5. WHEREAS, this stipulation waives no rights of either Party; 

6. WHEREAS, no other extension has previously been stipulated to, requested, or 

granted. 

STIPULATION 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT 

1. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiffs’ Complaint is extended by one day from May 2, 2016 to May 3, 2016; and

2. The deadline for Defendants to file the Reply in Support of Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint is extended by one day from May 9, 2016 to May 10, 2016. 

DATED: May 2, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 

MELLEN LAW FIRM 

 

 ___/s/ Eunji Cho____________

 Eunji Cho, Esq. 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

NATHAN TERRY 

GERALDINE TERRY 

DATED: May 2, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 

SEVERSON & WERSON 

 

 __/s/ Jason Julian________ ___

 Jason Julian, Esq. 

Attorney for Defendants 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 

U.S. BANK, N.A. 

Case 3:15-cv-01483-WHA Document 25 Filed 05/03/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Matthew D. Mellen (Bar No. 233350) 

Jessica Galletta (Bar No. 281179) 

Eunji Cho (Bar No. 286710) 

MELLEN LAW FIRM 

411 Borel Avenue, Suite 230 

San Mateo, California 94402 

Telephone: (650) 638-0120 

Facsimile: (650) 638-0125 

Attorney for Plaintiffs, 

NATHAN TERRY 

GERALDINE TERRY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NATHAN TERRY, an individual; GERALDINE 

TERRY, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a business 

entity; U.S. BANK, N.A., a business entity; and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

 Defendants.

Case No.: 3:15-cv-01483-WHA

 

[Assigned to the Hon. William Alsup]

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 

COMPLAINT

Date: May 26, 2016

Time: 8:00 a.m.

Ctrm.: 8, 19th Floor

Complaint Filed: March 31, 2015

Case 3:15-cv-01483-WHA Document 25 Filed 05/03/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed the above stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing therefore, It 

IS SO ORDERED. 

1. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiffs’ Complaint is extended by one day from May 2, 2016 to May 3, 2016; and

2. The deadline for Defendants to file the Reply in Support of Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint is extended by one day from May 9, 2016 to May 10, 2016. 

DATED: ___________________ ____________________ 

 Hon. William Alsup 

 United States District Court Judge 

May 3, 2016.

Case 3:15-cv-01483-WHA Document 25 Filed 05/03/16 Page 4 of 4