Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00348/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00348-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00348-AWI-BAM 

ACTIVE 39951579V1

Jeffrey D. Polsky (SBN 120975)

jpolsky@foxrothschild.com 

Jaemin Chang (SBN 232612) 

jchang@foxrothschild.com 

FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP

345 California Street, Suite 2200 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415.364.5540 

Facsimile: 415.391.4436 

Attorneys Specially Appearing for Defendant 

BRAD BERKLEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION 

GLENN A. ABRAHAMSON, an individual; 

JOSEPH WONG, an individual; BB17, LLC, 

a Wyoming limited liability company,

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

BRAD BERKLEY, an individual, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: 1:16-CV-00348-AWI-BAM

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 28 

DAYS; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

First Amended Complaint Filed: 3/18/16 

Plaintiffs Glenn A. Abrahamson, Joseph Wong and BB17, LLC (collectively “Plaintiffs”) 

and Defendant Bradley Berkley (specially appearing), by and through their attorneys of record in 

this case, hereby stipulate and agree that: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their initial Complaint in this action on March 11, 2016 (ECF 

No. 1); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint on March 18, 2016 (ECF No. 2); 

WHEREAS, Defendant’s responsive pleading is presently due on April 22, 2016; 

WHEREAS, Defendant requested and Plaintiffs agreed to a brief 14 day extension of time to 

respond to the First Amended Complaint; 

Case 1:16-cv-00348-AWI-BAM Document 9 Filed 04/28/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already 

fixed by the Court; 

WHEREAS, Local Rule 144(a) of the United State District Court for the Eastern District of 

California provides that the parties may stipulate to extend the time for responding to a complaint 

without leave of Court so long as all parties affected by the extension consent and the extension is no 

longer than 28 days; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through 

their respective counsel, that Defendant shall file his responsive pleading by May 6, 2016. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 21, 2016 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP

By /s/Jaemin Chang 

Jeffrey D. Polsky 

Jaemin Chang 

Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant 

BRAD BERKLEY 

Dated: April 21, 2016 KAHN, SOARES & CONWAY, LLP 

By /s/ Richard C. Conway (as authorized on 4/21/16) 

Richard C. Conway 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

GLENN A. ABRAHAMSON, 

JOSEPH WONG, and BB17, LLC 

ORDER 

The Court, having duly considered the parties’ stipulation set forth above, and good cause 

appearing, orders as follows: 

Defendant’s deadline to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is 

extended to May 6, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 27, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:16-cv-00348-AWI-BAM Document 9 Filed 04/28/16 Page 2 of 2