Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_12-cv-04290/USCOURTS-cand-4_12-cv-04290-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODOLFO AND ROBERTA E. THOMAS,

Plaintiff(s), No. C 12-4290 PJH

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

DISMISS

CHEVY CHASE BANK F.S.B., 

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

Before the court is defendant Chevy Chase Bank’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs

Rodolfo and Roberta E. Thomas’s complaint as “incomprehensible, nonsensical, and

incoherent.” Plaintiffs did not file an opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss. Because

there is no discernable legal basis for plaintiffs’ complaint, the court hereby GRANTS

defendant’s motion and dismisses the complaint. 

Although the court is of the opinion that re-pleading will not resolve the deficiencies

in the complaint, the court will nonetheless allow plaintiffs an opportunity to file an amended

complaint. For that amended complaint to be successful, plaintiffs must specify the number

of defendants being sued and identify each defendant by official name; must allege

separate causes of action; must state a constitutional or statutory basis for each cause of

action; and must allege facts showing each defendant’s personal involvement in the

wrongful act alleged in each cause of action. If plaintiffs fail to file the amended complaint

by January 23, 2013, or if they file an amended complaint not in accordance with the above

instructions, the case will be dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2013 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:12-cv-04290-PJH Document 10 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 1