Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03228/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03228-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

CEPHEID’S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03228-EDL

sf-3678938 

Erik R. Puknys (SBN: 190926) 

Erik.Puknys@finnegan.com 

M. Paul Barker (SBN: 243986) 

Paul.Barker@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Wesley E. Overson (SBN: 154737) 

WOverson@mofo.com 

Grant L. Kim (SBN: 114989) 

GKim@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: (415) 268-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Cepheid 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC., 

Plaintiff and 

Counterdefendant, 

v. 

CEPHEID, 

Defendant and 

Counterclaimant. 

 CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03228-EDL 

 

CEPHEID’S NOTICE OF 

WITHDRAWAL OF 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

FILE UNDER SEAL 

Case 3:14-cv-03228-EDL Document 88 Filed 08/02/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

CEPHEID’S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03228-EDL

sf-3678938 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, Defendant Cepheid hereby notifies the 

Court that it is withdrawing the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (“Administrative 

Motion”) that it submitted on July 19, 2016 (Docket Number (“D.N.”) 81). 

As Cepheid noted in its Administrative Motion, it sought leave to file under seal 

references in its Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Ineligibility (D.N. 81-4), to a 

document that Plaintiff Roche had submitted under seal. Cepheid explained that it thought 

there was no need to seal, but filed the motion because Roche declined to agree to disclosure. 

Civil Local Rule 79-5 required Roche to file a declaration establishing that the 

designated material should be sealed within four days of Administrative Motion, or by July 25, 

2016. Roche did not file any such declaration. On July 26, 2016, Roche notified Cepheid by 

email that it agreed that no portion of Cepheid’s summary judgment motion need be 

maintained under seal. A copy of that email is attached to this Notice as Exhibit A. 

In view of Roche’s notice and failure to file the required declaration, Cepheid requests 

that the Court deny Cepheid’s administrative motion. 

Dated: July 29, 2016 By: /s/ Grant L. Kim 

 Grant L. Kim 

Erik R. Puknys (SBN: 190926) 

Erik.Puknys@finnegan.com 

M. Paul Barker (SBN: 243986) 

Paul.Barker@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Wesley E. Overson (SBN: 154737) 

WOverson@mofo.com 

Grant L. Kim (SBN: 114989) 

GKim@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: (415) 268-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant Cepheid 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Dated: 8/2/2016

Case 3:14-cv-03228-EDL Document 88 Filed 08/02/16 Page 2 of 2