Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00607/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00607-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

PAVONE & 

FONNER, LLP | AFFELD 

GRIVAKES 

ZUCKER LLP | BURNS & 

SCHALENDEBRAND

 

 OFFICES OF

 ═════════

PAVONE & FONNER, LLP

 ═════════

 A LAW PARTNERSHIP

BENJAMIN PAVONE, ESQ., SBN 181826

7676 HAZARD CENTER DRIVE, 5TH FLOOR

 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108

TELEPHONE: 619 224 8885

FACSIMILE: 619 224 8886

EMAIL: bpavone@cox.net

 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

FUTTERMAN DUPREE DODD 

CROLEY MAIER LLP

MARTIN H. DODD (104363)

JAMIE L. DUPREE (158105)

JAIME G. TOUCHSTONE (233187)

180 Sansome Street, 17th Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 399-3840

Facsimile: (415) 399-3838

mdodd@fddcm.com

jdupree@fddcm.com

jtouchstone@fddcm.com

Attorneys for Defendant J. Clark Kelso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

 

 

Case No. 1:15-cv-00607-LJO-SAB

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

ALTAMIRANO, MARLON, et al.,

PLAINTIFFS,

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

et al.,

DEFENDANTS.

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:15-cv-00607-LJO-SAB Document 15 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

PAVONE & 

FONNER, LLP | AFFELD 

GRIVAKES 

ZUCKER LLP | BURNS & 

SCHALENDEBRAND

Plaintiffs Marlon Altamirano, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant J. Clark Kelso 

(“Defendant Kelso”), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. This case was filed on April 17, 2015. After being transferred to this Court,

the Court issued an order setting a scheduling conference on August 10, 2015.

2. Because this case is related to Smith et al. v. Schwarzenegger et al., 1:14-cv00060-LJO-SAB (“Smith”), which is presently awaiting a potentially case-dispositive 

ruling from the district court, this case, Altamirano, will likely track both the scheduling of 

Smith and the outcome of its ruling. Accordingly, as discussions about a litigation 

schedule should follow that ruling, the parties stipulate to continue this matter for 

approximately (30) days, to a date convenient to the Court’s calendar.

So stipulated.

Dated: August 4, 2015 FUTTERMAN DUPREE DODD 

CROLEY MAIER LLP

By: /s/Martin H. Dodd

Martin H. Dodd

Attorneys for Defendant J. Clark Kelso

Dated: August 4, 2015 PAVONE & FONNER, LLP

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 1:15-cv-00607-LJO-SAB Document 15 Filed 08/04/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

PAVONE & 

FONNER, LLP | AFFELD 

GRIVAKES 

ZUCKER LLP | BURNS & 

SCHALENDEBRAND

ORDER

Based on the Stipulation of the parties as set forth above, and good cause having 

been shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the scheduling conference set for August 10, 

2015, and its related obligations (Dkt. No. 9), is continued to September 29, 2015 at 1:30 

p.m. before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00607-LJO-SAB Document 15 Filed 08/04/15 Page 3 of 3