Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-05521/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-05521-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1Accordingly, Turner's Request for Leave to File Opposition Nunc Pro Tunc is moot.

1

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORTH AMERICAN CAPACITY

INSURANCE COMPANY,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

TURNER CONSTRUCTION

COMPANY, et al., 

 

 Defendants.

_____________________________/

No. C 03-5521 WDB

 

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On April 5, 2006, the Court conducted a hearing in connection with plaintiff's

Motion for Summary Judgment, filed January 9, 2006. Plaintiff withdrew its motion

with respect to Turner Construction1 but continues to pursue the motion as to James

E. Roberts-Obayashi Corporation.

The insurance coverage issue that is the subject of this motion has been decided

by the Alameda County Superior Court. See Exhibit 5 to Declaration of Martin L.

Seeger, filed February 1, 2006. Judgment was entered by the Superior Court in

Roberts-Obayashi v.Acceptance InsuranceCompanies, et al, Alameda Superior Court

Case No. RG04150387, on March 28, 2006. See, attached.

It appears that the Superior Court has resolved this issue and that, therefore,

there is no case or controversy pending in this Court. Plaintiff objects on the ground

that the Superior Court's judgment is not yet final as the time for appeal has not

Case 4:03-cv-05521-WDB Document 147 Filed 04/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

lapsed. This Court DECLINES to exercise jurisdiction at this time, but will not

dismiss this case until the time for appeal in the Superior Court has lapsed.

By Wednesday, June 14, 2006, plaintiff must file with the Court, deliver to

chambers, and serve on opposing counsel a statement updating the Court about the

status of the appeal relating to the March 28th judgment. 

After receiving plaintiff's June 14th submission, the Court will issue an order

either dismissing the case or notifying the remaining parties about how the Court

intends to proceed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 5, 2006 /s/ Wayne D. Brazil 

WAYNE D. BRAZIL

United States Magistrate Judge

Copies to: Parties, WDB, stats.

Case 4:03-cv-05521-WDB Document 147 Filed 04/05/06 Page 2 of 2