Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00475/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00475-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

JENNIFER BRONSON, an

individual,

NO. CIV. S-04-0475 WBS GGH

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER RE:

EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., an

Indiana Corporation, 

Defendant.

______________________________

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., an

Indiana Corporation, 

Cross-Claimant,

v.

JENNIFER BRONSON, 

an individual,

Cross-Defendant

----oo0oo----

Before the court is defendant’s motion for summary

judgment. On April 25, 2005, defendant filed twenty-four

objections to statements in plaintiff’s declaration and moved to

strike the portions of her declaration to which it objected. 

Case 2:04-cv-00475-WBS-GGH Document 22 Filed 04/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendant’s objections are made primarily on the grounds that the

statements at issue constitute hearsay or inadmissable personal

opinion, violate the best evidence or parol evidence rules, or

are vague and ambiguous, conclusory, lacking in foundation,

argumentative, speculative, and/or irrelevant. To rule on

defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the court must first

decide these objections. Accordingly, at the hearing currently

set for May 2, 2005, at 1:30 p.m., the court will hear only the

evidentiary objections. The hearing on the motion for summary

judgment will be rescheduled for a later date after the

evidentiary objections have been resolved.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 27, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-00475-WBS-GGH Document 22 Filed 04/27/05 Page 2 of 2