Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00769/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00769-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAIME IGNACIO ESTRADA,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. PFEIFFER, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:23-cv-00769 KES GSA (PC)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ORDER

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE JUNE 4, 

2024

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 9, 2024, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and the Court found that it failed to 

state a claim upon which relief could be granted. ECF No. 12 at pg 14. As a result, Plaintiff was 

ordered to file a first amended complaint and was given thirty days to do so. Id. At that time, 

Plaintiff was also cautioned that his failure to fully comply with the order within the time allotted 

might result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed. Id.

More than thirty days has now passed and Plaintiff has neither filed an amended 

complaint nor otherwise responded to the Court’s order. Therefore, the undersigned will 

recommend that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court 

order. See Fed. R. Civ P. 41(b); Local Rule 110.

Case 1:23-cv-00769-KES-GSA Document 15 Filed 05/22/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without 

prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b);

Local Rule 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations – by June 4, 2024, – Plaintiff may 

file written objections with the Court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 21, 2024 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:23-cv-00769-KES-GSA Document 15 Filed 05/22/24 Page 2 of 2