Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_23-cv-00535/USCOURTS-azd-4_23-cv-00535-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jennifer Mohr,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

No. CV-23-00535-TUC-SHR

Order Adopting Report 

& Recommendation 

On November 1, 2024, Magistrate Judge Lynnette C. Kimmins issued a Report and 

Recommendation ("R&R") in which she recommended the Court affirm the Commissioner 

of Social Security's decision. (Doc. 26.) The R&R notified the parties they had fourteen 

(14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R to file any objections. (Id. at 7.) No 

objections have been filed. 

If neither party objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the 

District Court is not required to review the magistrate judge's decision under any specified 

standard of review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); see also United States v. 

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (noting a district court need 

only review a magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is 

made). However, the statute for review of a magistrate judge's recommendation "does not 

preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under 

a de novo or any other standard." Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154.

Case 4:23-cv-00535-SHR Document 27 Filed 12/17/24 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In this case, the deadline for filing objections has passed. As noted, no objections 

have been filed, and neither party has requested additional time to do so despite the warning 

from Judge Kimmins indicating "[i]f objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed 

waived." (Doc. 26 at 7.) Therefore, the Court will adopt the R&R on that basis alone. See 

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (declining to

substantively review the magistrate judge's report and recommendation because no 

objections were filed). 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED Magistrate Judge Kimmins' Report and Recommendation (Doc. 

26) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Commissioner of Social Security's decision is 

AFFIRMED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly 

and close this case.

Dated this 17th day of December, 2024.

Case 4:23-cv-00535-SHR Document 27 Filed 12/17/24 Page 2 of 2