Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00421/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00421-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 196
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Although counsel made this statement in the status report and not through a declaration, 1

the court accepts the representation.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERA FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0421 FCD GGH PS

vs.

PHIL HUIE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 /

Defendants are proceeding pro se in this action. By order filed March 5, 2007, the

district court directed the parties to file a joint status report within sixty days. The sixty days

have since passed, and defendants have not responded to the court’s order. Counsel for plaintiff,

who unilaterally filed a status report on May 25, 2007, represents that she has unsuccessfully

attempted to contact defendants in order to draft a joint status report together. Defendants did 1

not respond to plaintiff’s counsel’s attempt. 

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:07-cv-00421-FCD-GGH Document 13 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, defendants are directed to SHOW CAUSE, within fifteen days from

the date this order is filed, why the court should not recommend that the answer be stricken for

failure to participate in the joint status report, and for failure to obey court orders. 

DATED: 6/20/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH/076

ERA0421.osc.wpd

Case 2:07-cv-00421-FCD-GGH Document 13 Filed 06/21/07 Page 2 of 2