Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01482/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01482-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARISSA SCHUSTER,

Petitioner,

v.

DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, 

Respondent.

Case No. 1:12-cv-01482-AWI-SAB-HC

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Petitioner is proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

2254. 

On May 17, 2013, this Court issued Findings and Recommendation that Respondent’s 

motion to dismiss be granted. (ECF No. 30). On February 20, 2015, the District Judge issued an 

order adopting the Court’s analysis in the Findings and Recommendation. (ECF No. 36). 

However, because McQuiggin v. Perkins, 133 S.Ct. 1924 (2013), was decided after the Findings 

and Recommendation was issued, the District Judge has permitted the parties to brief the 

application of McQuiggin. The District Judge referred the matter back to the undersigned for 

briefing with respect to McQuiggin, and for the undersigned to issue a Findings and 

Recommendation regarding the application of McQuiggin to this case. The District Judge also 

indicated that if the undersigned believes that relevant facts were not adequately considered in

the Findings and Recommendation, then as part of the undersigned’s Findings and 

Case 1:12-cv-01482-AWI-SAB Document 37 Filed 02/24/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Recommendation regarding McQuiggin, the undersigned may issue amended findings regarding 

equitable tolling. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall file a brief regarding the application of McQuiggin to this case or file 

a notice that she does not wish to pursue any issues relating to McQuiggin within 

sixty (60) days of the date of service of this order; 

2. Respondent shall file a response to Petitioner’s brief regarding McQuiggin within 

thirty (30) days of the date Petitioner’s brief is filed with the Court; and

3. Petitioner may file a reply to Respondent’s response brief within (14) days after 

Respondent’s response is served. 

All motions shall be submitted on the record and briefs filed without oral argument unless 

otherwise ordered by the Court. Local Rule 230(l). Extensions of time will only be granted 

upon a showing of good cause. All provisions of Local Rule 110 are applicable to this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01482-AWI-SAB Document 37 Filed 02/24/15 Page 2 of 2