Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02424/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02424-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Stip/Order Re Dismissal Case No. C06-02424 MHP 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

JOHN L. BURRIS (SBN #69888)

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120

Oakland, California 94621

(510) 839-5200; FAX (510) 839-3882

Email: john.burris@johnburrislaw.com

JAMES B. CHANIN (SBN# 76043)

JULIE M. HOUK (SBN# 114968)

Law Offices of James B. Chanin

3050 Shattuck Avenue

Berkeley, California 94705

(510) 848-4752; FAX: (510) 848-5819

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE DOE and MARY ROE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C06-02424 MHP

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF

ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

AND ORDER THEREON

THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF

RECORD, DO HEREBY AGREE AND STIPULATE THAT:

Pursuant to the terms of the settlement between Plaintiffs JANE DOE and MARY ROE

and defendant CITY OF OAKLAND, all parties do hereby request that the entire action shall be

Case 3:06-cv-02424-MHP Document 23 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 2
Stip/Order Re Dismissal Case No. C06-02424 MHP 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: February 15, 2007 ___________/s/______________________

JOHN L. BURRIS

Attorney for Plaintiff

JANE DOE

Dated: February 15, 2007 ___________/s/______________________

JAMES B. CHANIN

Attorney for Plaintiff

MARY ROE

Dated: February 15, 2007 __________/s/_______________________

INES VARGAS FRAENKEL

Attorney for Defendant

CITY OF OAKLAND

Dated: February 16, 2007 ___________/s/______________________

GEOFFREY A. BEATY

Attorney for Defendant

RICHARD VALERGA

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: _______________, 2007 _________________________________

MARILYN HALL PATEL

Judge of the United States District Court

Case 3:06-cv-02424-MHP Document 23 Filed 02/23/07 Page 2 of 2