Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01914/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01914-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BILL MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1914 FCD PAN (GGH) PS

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed March 8, 2006, plaintiff was granted twenty days to file an

amended application to proceed in forma pauperis and an amended complaint that conforms with

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The twenty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an

amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the

reasons given in the November 10, 2005, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this

action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

Case 2:05-cv-01914-FCD-PAN Document 14 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 6/20/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

martinez1914.fta

Case 2:05-cv-01914-FCD-PAN Document 14 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2