Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02167/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02167-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDY LAMAR BLACK,

Plaintiff,

v.

P. THOMPSON, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:21-cv-02167-TLN-EFB

ORDER

Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel in a civil action. The matter was 

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Court’s Local Rules. 

On November 7, 2022, the magistrate judge issued an order screening Plaintiff’s amended 

Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff has filed “Objections” to 

that order, which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 40.)

Local Rule 303(f) provides that magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly 

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not 

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the Magistrate Judge 

filed November 7, 2022, is AFFIRMED (ECF No. 38). 

//

//

Case 2:21-cv-02167-TLN-EFB Document 44 Filed 12/30/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

DATED: December 29, 2022

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge

Case 2:21-cv-02167-TLN-EFB Document 44 Filed 12/30/22 Page 2 of 2