Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_98-cv-02111/USCOURTS-caed-2_98-cv-02111-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW RICK LOPEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. PETERSON, et. al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:98-cv-2111-MCE-EFB P

ORDER

Plaintiff filed a “Request for Court to Lift Dispositive Motion Deadline.” ECF No. 435. 

On November 10, 2015, the magistrate judge issued an order denying Plaintiff’s Motion. ECF 

No. 436. On November 30, 2015, Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s order. ECF 

No. 439. The Court construes Plaintiff’s objections as a request for reconsideration.

Pursuant to Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly 

erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that the 

magistrate judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:98-cv-02111-MCE-EFB Document 447 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the order of the magistrate judge filed November 

10, 2015(ECF No. 436) is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s objections to the magistrate judge’s order 

(ECF No. 439) is construed as a motion for reconsideration and DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 22, 2015

Case 2:98-cv-02111-MCE-EFB Document 447 Filed 12/23/15 Page 2 of 2