Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03759/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03759-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 895
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 05:552 Right to Privacy Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES 

UNION OF NORTH CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF 

INVESTIGATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 10-cv-03759-RS 

ORDER TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTS 

FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW

The FBI asserts that attorney-client privilege applies to redacted portions of Human Source 

Advisory Notices. At this juncture, there remain questions about whether some of the FBI’s 

redactions properly protect communications protected by attorney-client privilege. Out of an 

abundance of caution, in camera review of those documents is appropriate to resolve the FBI’s 

motion for summary judgment. Thus, the FBI shall provide the court the unredacted Human 

Source Advisory Notices within seven (7) days of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 6, 2015

______________________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-03759-RS Document 150 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 1