Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02420/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02420-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

06cv2420-WQH (BLM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TEDDY LEROY WILSON, Jr., CDCR

#78443,

Plaintiff,

v.

ISMAEL BRIZYELA, et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06cv2420-WQH (BLM)

ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION

REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND

[Doc. No. 34]

On September 25, 2007, Plaintiff filed a second request seeking

additional time to oppose Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Doc. No. 34.

The Court granted Plaintiff’s first request on August 9, 2007. Doc. No.

32.

Plaintiff submits that he cannot comply with the October 9, 2007

deadline for filing an opposition because he remains unable to access a

law library. Doc. No. 34. He presents evidence showing that the prison

library has been closed for months and did not reopen until the day

before he was released from custody. Id. The residential treatment

facility at which he now resides does not have a library and he is not

allowed to leave the facility. Id. Plaintiff submitted a letter from

Case 3:06-cv-02420-WQH-BLM Document 38 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 06cv2420-WQH (BLM)

the executive director of the facility, which confirms that Plaintiff

entered the program on September 19, 2007, and will not be allowed to

leave the facility for personal reasons (such as to go to a law library)

for the first sixty days. Id.

In light of this request and the evidence presented, the Court

finds good cause to GRANT Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to

oppose Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Recognizing that for sixty days

from September 19, 2007, Plaintiff will be unable obtain personal passes

to access a law library (see Doc. No. 34 at 8), the Court hereby grants

Plaintiff an extension to December 14, 2007 to file his opposition.

Defendants shall file their reply, if any, on or before December 21,

2007. The hearing date is hereby continued to January 3, 2008 at 9:00

a.m. However, unless the Court directs otherwise in advance, pursuant

to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the matter will be resolved without oral

argument and no personal appearances are required on January 3, 2008 at

9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 3, 2007

BARBARA L. MAJOR

United States Magistrate Judge

COPY TO: 

HONORABLE WILLIAM Q. HAYES

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ALL COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-02420-WQH-BLM Document 38 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 2