Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04884/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04884-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, 

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT,

et al.,

Defendants. /

Case No. C-06-4884-SI

ORDER REGARDING IN CAMERA

REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS

On October 26, 2007, defendants delivered three non-redacted documents to the Court for in

camera review pursuant to the Court’s October 18, 2007 order (Docket No. 92). The Court has

reviewed the documents, identified as P68, P70, and P92. The Court finds that defendants properly

asserted the deliberative process privilege with respect to the redacted portions of documents P68 and

P70 and with respect to all of document P90. Because defendants have already provided redacted copies

of P68 and P70 as part of the Third Supplement to the Administrative Record, no further action is

required. The clerk shall file copies of the three documents under seal. Defendants may contact the

clerk to arrange to retrieve the original documents.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 6, 2007 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-04884-SI Document 97 Filed 11/06/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case 3:06-cv-04884-SI Document 97 Filed 11/06/07 Page 2 of 2