Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-06396/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-06396-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 On April 19, 2005, plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment strip search claims, conspiracy claims, verbal

abuse/harassment claims, due process claims, equal protection claims, and Eighth Amendment exercise claim were

dismissed from this action, with prejudice, for failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted, and

defendants Carey and Tyson were dismissed from this action, with prejudice, based on plaintiff’s failure to state any

claims upon which relief may be granted against them. (Doc. 30.)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT LEE ROBINS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

L. ATCHUE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. CV-F-01-6396 REC SMS P

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF SECOND

AMENDEDCOMPLAINTAPPROPRIATE,AND

FORWARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS

DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR

COMPLETION AND RETURN

(Doc. 28)

Plaintiff Robert Lee Robins, Jr. (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on

November 5, 2001. The court has screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed August 4,

2003, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and finds that it appears to state cognizable claims for relief

under section 1983 against defendants Atchue, Ritchie, De Luna, Sullivan, Winett, Todd, Vaughn,

Shiley, Whitlach, Schmidt, Crowell, Chapman, Grounds, Craven, Cramer, Leonard, Dam, and

Eskardari for retaliation; against defendants Atchue, Ritchie, and White for excessive force; against

defendant De Luna for denial of medical treatment; and against defendants Atchue, Jelleschitz,

Johnson, and Cramer for violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments based on the strip

searches.1

Case 1:01-cv-06396-LJO -SMS Document 31 Filed 04/20/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

C/O L. ATCHUE

C/O L. RITCHIE

C/O M. WHITE

C/O M. A. JELLESCHITZ

C/O B. A. JOHNSON

H. De LUNA, R.N.

CDW L. SULLIVAN

AW D. WINETT

AW K. TODD

AW T. C. VAUGHN

AW C. SHILEY

S. WHITLACH, CLASSIFICATION & PAROLE REP.

F. SCHMIDT, CLASSIFICATION & PAROLE REP.

G. CROWELL

CPT. D. CHAPMAN

CC II R. GROUNDS

CC II M. CRAVEN

SGT. P. CRAMER

T. LEONARD, PSW

DR. N. DAM

DR. ESKARDARI

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff twenty-one (21) USM-285 forms, twentyone (21) summonses, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed August

4, 2003.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

Case 1:01-cv-06396-LJO -SMS Document 31 Filed 04/20/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Twenty-two (22) copies of the endorsed complaint filed August 4, 2003. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:01-cv-06396-LJO -SMS Document 31 Filed 04/20/05 Page 3 of 3