Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04908/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04908-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER C07-04908 MHP

8086/76946-001 

Current/10345470v2

KATHARINE H. PARKER, Admission Pro Hac Vice Pending

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

1585 Broadway

New York, NY 10036-8299

Telephone: 212.969.3009

Facsimile: 212.969.2900

kparker@proskauer.com

DAWN M. IRIZARRY, SBN 223303

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206

Telephone: (310) 557-2900

Facsimile: (310) 557-2193

dirizarry@proskauer.com

Attorneys for Defendant

Cendant Corporation Short Term Disability 

Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CENDANT CORPORATION SHORT TERM 

DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 07- 04908 MHP

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO THE 

COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Case 3:07-cv-04908-MHP Document 4 Filed 11/20/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER C07-04908 MHP

8086/76946-001 

Current/10345470v2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned attorneys 

for Plaintiff John Doe and Defendant Cendant Corporation Short Term Disability Plan

(“Defendant”) that Defendant’s time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint is 

hereby extended to December 3, 2007. 

Dated: November___, 2007 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

By: /s/ Dawn M. Irizarry

Dawn M. Irizarry

Attorneys for Defendant

Cendant Corporation Short Term Disability Plan

Dated: November___, 2007 LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & 

JACKSON, P.C.

By: /s/ Nina Wasow (Signature attached as Exhibit A)

Nina Wasow

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOHN DOE

Case 3:07-cv-04908-MHP Document 4 Filed 11/20/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER C07-04908 MHP

8086/76946-001 

Current/10345470v2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having read and considered the Stipulation of the parties, and good causing appearing 

therein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s time to answer, move or otherwise respond 

to the Complaint is hereby extended to and including December 3, 2007.

Dated: November ____, 2007 _________________________________

 Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel

20

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:07-cv-04908-MHP Document 4 Filed 11/20/07 Page 3 of 3