Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-01050/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-01050-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY E. WALKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

MINA BESHARA, ET. AL.,

Defendants.

No. 1:20-cv-01050-NONE-HBK

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Doc. Nos. 29, 30, 31, 42)

Plaintiff Jeffrey E. Walker initiated this action as a civil detainee proceeding pro se by 

filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1.) The matter was referred to 

the assigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern 

District of California Local Rule 302. 

On December 10, 2021, the magistrate judge issued a findings and recommendations

recommending that plaintiff’s motions for a temporary restraining order be denied. (Doc. No. 

42.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any

objections thereto were due to be filed within fourteen days. (Id. at 1,7.) Plaintiff has not filed 

any objections and the time do so has expired. (See docket.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Case 1:20-cv-01050-JLT-HBK Document 43 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

ACCORDINGLY:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on December 10, 2021 (Doc. No. 42) are 

adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (Doc. Nos. 29, 30, 31), are DENIED; 

2. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for future proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2022 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-01050-JLT-HBK Document 43 Filed 01/07/22 Page 2 of 2