Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03708/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03708-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL S. WHITE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-03708 JSW

ORDER RE (1) JUDGE VADAS

AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

The Court has identified this action as one that appears suitable for reassignment to

Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas, whose courtroom is located in Eureka, California, for all

future proceedings. Such reassignment has the potential to result in greater convenience to the

parties and more expeditious disposition of the matter on the merits.

On or before December 28, 2007, each party shall file a letter stating whether or not they

request reassignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Vadas. If all parties so request, the

matter will be transferred. The parties will thereafter file written consent to the jurisdiction of a

magistrate judge in the form requested by Magistrate Judge Vadas.

On November 26, 2007, Plaintiff filed his Third Amended Complaint. In this document,

Plaintiff explained that he filed the amended complaint in an effort to comply with the Court’s

order that Plaintiff serve all parties by November 26, 2007. To comply with the Court’s order,

Plaintiff shall serve a copy of his amended complaint filed on September 25, 2007. Plaintiff

shall file proof of such service by no later than December 19, 2007. 

Case 3:07-cv-03708-JSW Document 16 Filed 12/06/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint was filed in violation of Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 15(a), which requires leave of court if a party wishes to amend a pleading more than

once. Therefore, the Court HEREBY STRIKES the Third Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff

wishes to amend his complaint, he shall file a noticed motion to file an amended complaint. In

his motion, Plaintiff shall explain what changes he seeks to make to his complaint and what the

basis is for such proposed amendment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 6, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-03708-JSW Document 16 Filed 12/06/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL S. WHITE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

USA et al,

Defendant. /

Case Number: CV07-03708 JSW 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on December 6, 2007, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by

placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter

listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an

inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Cynthia Lewis Stier

United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

Michael S. White

P.O. Box 304

Hopland, CA 95449

Dated: December 6, 2007

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:07-cv-03708-JSW Document 16 Filed 12/06/07 Page 3 of 3