Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01022/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01022-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TROAS V. BARNETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID NORMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-01022-GBC 

DISCOVERY ORDER 

SCHEDULING ORDER

Unenumerated Rule 12(b) Motion Deadline - 12/20/2010

Deadline to Amend Pleadings - 01/20/2011

Discovery Cut-Off Date - 03/20/2011

Dispositive Motion Deadline - 05/31/2011

On October 19, 2010, Defendant Martin Gamboa has answered the amended complaint filed

on October 30, 2008. The scheduling order is now amended to extend the deadline for Defendant

Gamboa to submit an unenumerated 12(b) motion. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1,

16, and 26-36, discovery shall proceed as follows:

1. Discovery requests shall be served by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 5 and Local Rule 135, and shall only be filed when required by Local Rules 250.2, 250.3,

and 250.4;

2. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the request

is first served;

3. To ensure that the responding party has forty-five (45) days after the request is first served

to respond, discovery requests must be served at least forty-five (45) days before the discovery

deadline; 

4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), defendants may depose plaintiff

1

Case 1:05-cv-01022-BAM Document 77 Filed 10/25/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and any other witness confined in a prison upon condition that, at least fourteen (14) days before

such a deposition, defendants serve all parties with the notice required by Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 30(b)(1); and

5. If disputes arise about the parties’ obligations to respond to requests for discovery, the

parties shall comply with all pertinent rules including Rules 5, 7, 11, 26, and 37 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure and Rules 110, 130, 131, 133, 135, 142, 144, and 230(l) of the Local Rules of

Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. Unless otherwise

ordered, Local Rule 251 shall not apply, and the requirement set forth in Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure 26 and 37 that a party seeking relief from the court certify that he or she has in good faith

conferred or attempted to confer with the other party or person in an effort to resolve the dispute

prior to seeking court action shall not apply. Voluntary compliance with this provision of Rules 26

and 37 is encouraged, however. A discovery motion that does not comply with all applicable rules

will be stricken and may result in imposition of sanctions.

Further:

6. The parties are advised that the deadline for filing motions to dismissfor failure to exhaust

the administrative remedies pursuant to the unenumerated portion of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

12(b) shall be 12/20/2010;

7. The deadline for amending the pleadings shall be 01/20/2011;

8. The parties are advised that the deadline for the completion of all discovery, including

filing motions to compel, shall be 03/20/2011; 

9. The deadline for filing pre-trial dispositive motions shall be 05/31/2011;1

10. A request for an extension of a deadline set in this order must be filed on or before

the expiration of the deadline in question; and

11. Extensions of time will only be granted on a showing of good cause.IT IS SO

ORDERED. 

The pre-trial dispositive motion deadline does not apply to the filing of unenumerated Rule 12(b) motions

1

to dismiss for failure to exhaust. Unenumerated Rule 12(b) motions for failure to exhaust must be filed on or before

the deadline separately set forth in this order.

2

Case 1:05-cv-01022-BAM Document 77 Filed 10/25/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

612e7dDated: October 22, 2010 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

3

Case 1:05-cv-01022-BAM Document 77 Filed 10/25/10 Page 3 of 3