Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02133/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02133-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Gonzalo Alvarez-Campos,

Petitioner, 

vs.

Tom Long, et al., 

 Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-2133-PHX-MHM

ORDER

Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241

on September 7, 2006, challenging his continued detention from a 2006 order of removal

against him. On November 17, 2006, Respondents filed their response to Petitioner’s

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Petitioner filed his Traverse on November 28, 2006.

On December 6, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and Recommendation

recommending that the petition be granted. 

In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

Case 2:06-cv-02133-MHM Document 17 Filed 05/29/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting the Petitioner’s petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus [doc. 1].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing Respondents to provide a hearing to Petitioner

before an Immigration Judge with the power to grant him bail unless the government

establishes that he is a flight risk or will be a danger to the community. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Petitioner’s Motion to adopt

Magistrates Report and Recommendation [16]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 28th day of May, 2008.

Case 2:06-cv-02133-MHM Document 17 Filed 05/29/08 Page 2 of 2