Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00625/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00625-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FELIPE GARCIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

C/O EMERSON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00625-LJO-SAB-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF No. 31)

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AND 

DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On May 6, 2016, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 

Defendants Beard, Brown, Holland, and Rodriguez be dismissed, and Plaintiff’s verbal threats, 

management cell, medical care, retaliation, CDCR policy, and conspiracy claims be dismissed.

Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. On May 31, 2016, 

Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the record to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

Case 1:14-cv-00625-LJO-SAB Document 33 Filed 06/03/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on May 6, 

2016, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants Beard, Brown, Holland, and Rodriguez are dismissed, and Plaintiff’s 

verbal threats, management cell, medical care, retaliation, CDCR policy, and conspiracy claims 

are dismissed, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted 

under section 1983;

3. This action is referred to the Magistrate Judge for service of the December 23, 

2015, first amended complaint on Defendants Emerson, Wildey, Gaona, and Hobmeier.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 3, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 1:14-cv-00625-LJO-SAB Document 33 Filed 06/03/16 Page 2 of 2