Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01586/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01586-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PRINTED ON

RECYCLED PAPER

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT– C 07-01586 MHP

Albert J. Tumpson (State Bar No. 122950)

LAW OFFICES OF ALBERT J. TUMPSON

9595 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 305

Beverly Hills, California 90210

Telephone: (310)858-7635

Attorneys for Defendants, PAUL KANTNER and SAIO THORN, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JEFFERSON STARSHIP, INC., GRACE

SLICK JOHNSON p/k/a GRACE SLICK and

WILLIAM C. THOMPSON

Plaintiffs,

vs.

PAUL KANTNER, SAIO THORN, INC. and

MICHAEL GAIMAN, individually and d/b/a

MISSION CONTROL 

Defendants

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 07-01586 MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

The signatories below, by and through their counsel, being all of the parties to this action,

hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS the First Amended Complaint herein (“FAC”) was served upon Kantner on

July 6, 2007; and

WHEREAS Defendants, Paul Kantner and Saio Thorn, Inc. (the “Defendants”), desire to

file a Motion to Dismiss as their initial response to the FAC; and

WHEREAS the Court’s Standing Order No. 4 prohibits filing a motion to dismiss prior

to the initial Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for August 27, 2007,without

Court approval; and

Case 3:07-cv-01586-MHP Document 22 Filed 08/24/07 Page 1 of 6
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PRINTED ON

RECYCLED PAPER STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT– C 07-01586 MHP

-2-

WHEREAS in order to avoid the time and expense of Defendants’ filing an Answer and

then filing a Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs and Defendants have stipulated and agreed that the

time for the Defendants’ Answer or other response to the FAC shall be extended until September

15, 2007;

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate that the time for the

Defendants’ Answer or other response to the FAC shall be extended until September 15, 2007.

Dated: August 16, 2007

LAW OFFICES OF GLENDON W. MISKEL

 /S/ 

Glendon W. Miskel, Attorney for Plaintiffs, 

Jefferson Starship, Inc., Grace Slick Johnson 

and William C. Thompson

LAW OFFICES OF ALBERT J. TUMPSON

 /S/ 

Albert J. Tumpson, Attorney for Defendants, 

Paul Kantner and Saio Thorn, Inc.

Dated: August ___, 2007

It is hereby ORDERED that the time for the Answer or other response of the Defendants, 

Paul Kantner and Saio Thorn, Inc., to the FAC shall be extended until September 15, 2007.

___________________________________

United States District Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:07-cv-01586-MHP Document 22 Filed 08/24/07 Page 2 of 6
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PRINTED ON

RECYCLED PAPER STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT– C 07-01586 MHP

-3-

DECARATION OF ALBERT J. TUMPSON

I, Albert J. Tumpson, hereby declare as follows:

1. The testimony set forth in this declaration is given of my own personal knowledge and, if

called to testify in this matter, I would so state.

2. I am counsel for the Defendants, Paul Kantner and Saio Thorn, Inc. (the “Defendants”) in

the captioned matter.

3. The FAC herein was served upon Kantner on July 6, 2007.

4. Plaintiffs filed, on August 10, 2007, a “Notice of Sub-Service of Process on Saio Thorne,

Inc. C/O Mission Control,” which asserts that the Defendant, Saio Thorne, Inc., was served on

July 29, 2007.

5. Plaintiffs and Defendants previously agreed to extend the time for Defendant Kantner to

answer or otherwise respond to the FAC from July 26, 2007 until August 9, 2007, which was the

only time modification which has occurred in this case. 

6. Defendants, Paul Kantner and Saio Thorn, Inc. (the “Defendants”), desire to file a Motion

to Dismiss as their initial response to the FAC.

7. The Court’s Standing Order No. 4 prohibits filing a Motion to Dismiss prior to the initial

Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for August 27, 2007,without Court approval. 

8. In order to avoid the time and expense of Defendants’ filing an Answer and then filing a

Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs and Defendants have stipulated and agreed that the time for the

Defendants’ Answer or other response to the FAC shall be extended until September 15, 2007.

9. Since the Court has not set any dates for this case except for the date of the Case

Management Conference, this time modification will have no effect on the schedule for this case.

10. Defendant, Saio Thorn, Inc. does not, by this stipulation, intend to make a general

appearance herein.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:07-cv-01586-MHP Document 22 Filed 08/24/07 Page 3 of 6
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PRINTED ON

RECYCLED PAPER STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT– C 07-01586 MHP

-4-

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United

States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

Given this August 16, 2007 at Beverly Hills, California.

 /S/ 

Albert J. Tumpson

Case 3:07-cv-01586-MHP Document 22 Filed 08/24/07 Page 4 of 6
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PRINTED ON

RECYCLED PAPER STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT– C 07-01586 MHP

-5-

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a

"conformed" signature (/S/) within the foregoing efiled document. 

 /S/ 

 Albert J. Tumpson

Case 3:07-cv-01586-MHP Document 22 Filed 08/24/07 Page 5 of 6
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PRINTED ON

RECYCLED PAPER STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT– C 07-01586 MHP

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18

and not a party to the within action; my business address is 9595 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 305,

Beverly Hills, California 90212.

On August 16, 2007, I served the foregoing document described as: STIPULATION

AND ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT on the interested

parties in this action by placing true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as

follows:

Glendon W. Miskel, Esq.

LAW OFFICES OF JOHNSON & MISKEL

2330 Marinship Way

Suite 230, Marina Office Plaza

Sausalito, California 94965-2800

[ X ] BY MAIL

[ ] I deposited such envelope in the mail at Beverly Hills, California. The envelope

was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid.

[ ] I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing

correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with

postage thereon fully prepaid at Beverly Hills, California in the ordinary course of business. I am

aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date

or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

[ ] PERSONAL SERVICE: I caused such envelope to be delivered by hand to the

addressee so specified.

[ ] FACSIMILE: I caused the foregoing document to be sent by facsimile to the fax

number indicated above.

Executed on November 12, 2002 at Los Angeles, California.

[ ] (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the above is true and correct.

[X] (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this

court at whose direction the service was made.

 ALBERT J. TUMPSON /S/

__________________________________

Type or print name Signature

Case 3:07-cv-01586-MHP Document 22 Filed 08/24/07 Page 6 of 6