Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-91-01352/USCOURTS-ca10-91-01352-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

FI LED 

United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

TRYGUE B. BAUGE, ) 

) 

Plaintiff-Appellant, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, ) 

some of its agents individually and in ) 

their official capacities; BEHAVIORAL ) 

SYSTEMS SOUTH WEST, and some of its ) 

past and present employees; PAUL ) 

JERNIGAN, individually and in his ) 

official capacity; HUGH WALKER, ) 

individually and in his official ) 

capacity; HAROLD OAKS, individually ) 

and in his official capacity; KAREN ) 

GIEM; LANCE BELL; UNITED AIRLINES, INC.;) 

CITY OF DENVER, ) 

) 

Defendants-Appellees. ) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

JUL 2 9 i992 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 91-1352 

(D.C. No. 89-S-902) 

(D. Colo.) 

Before LOGAN, EBEL, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs. and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppal. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 91-1352 Document: 010110275155 Date Filed: 07/29/1992 Page: 1
34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

Plaintiff appeals from a district court order dismissing his 

civil rights action for, among other reasons, failure to state a 

claim upon which relief may be granted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). 

Plaintiff brought this action, generally, to challenge the 

legality of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and, 

more specifically, to obtain redress for alleged constitutional 

transgressions arising out of, or indirectly relating to, his 

detention and pending deportation by the INS. We have reviewed 

the arguments advanced by Plaintiff and conclude that this appeal 

is without merit. 

The judgment of the United States District Court for the 

District of Colorado is AFFIRMED. 

Entered for the Court 

David M. Ebel 

Circuit Judge 

2 

Appellate Case: 91-1352 Document: 010110275155 Date Filed: 07/29/1992 Page: 2