Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05616/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05616-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

McNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

P.O. BOX 5288, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 

TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 

FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES 

 

JAMES V. FITZGERALD, III (State Bar No. 55632) 

NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167) 

MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,

PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP 

1211 Newell Avenue 

Post Office Box 5288 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: (925) 939-5330 

Facsimile: (925) 939-0203 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF RICHMOND, OFFICER CANTRELL, OFFICER R. 

THOMAS, OFFICER POMEROY, OFFICER MOODY, and 

OFFICER FUNK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LAZARIS ITALO FULLER, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY OF RICHMOND, OFFICER 

CANTRELL, OFFICER R. THOMAS, 

OFFICER POMEROY, OFFICER 

MOODY, and OFFICER FUNK, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No. C03-5616 MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER 

RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY, OR IN 

THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO PROPOUND MORE 

INTERROGATORIES__________________ 

Date: October 24, 2006 

Time: 9:00 A.M. 

Dept: Courtroom E, 15th Floor 

Judge: Mag. Judge Elizabeth Laporte 

Compl. Filed: December 16, 2003 

Trial Date: February 12, 2007 

Disc. Cut-Off: September 1, 2006 

Judge: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

After full consideration of the moving papers and supporting documents, the opposition 

and opposing arguments, the reply arguments, and good cause having been shown, the Court 

finds that Defendants’ Motion to Compel Further Responses from Plaintiff is hereby GRANTED 

IN PART, as indicated below. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff needs to respond to 

Defendants Request for Special Interrogatory No. 20, as it relates to Requests for Admissions, Set 

Case 3:03-cv-05616-MMC Document 95 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-05616-MMC Document 97 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 2
McNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

P.O. BOX 5288, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 

TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 

FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES

2 

Two, requests One through Two only, as to all Defendants, by no later than 4:00 p.m. on October 

31, 2006. Service of such responses on all parties shall be made by facsimile and mail at that 

time. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:____________ ___________________________ 

 Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

Approved as to form. 

____/s/ Jennifer Brady________________________ 

Jennifer Brady, Esq. 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Case 3:03-cv-05616-MMC Document 95 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 2

October 25, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:03-cv-05616-MMC Document 97 Filed 10/25/06 Page 2 of 2