Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-04063/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-04063-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION OF SANDISK AND MEMOREX AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRE-TRIAL 

SCHEDULE

-1- Memorex - Stip re pre-trial schedule_(PALIB1_3153554_1) (5) 

JAMES C. YOON, State Bar No. 177155 (jyoon@wsgr.com) 

MICHAEL A. BERTA, State Bar No. 194650 (mberta@wsgr.com) 

ARIANA M. CHUNG-HAN, State Bar No. 197572 (achung@wsgr.com) 

RYAN R. SMITH, State Bar No. 229323 (rsmith@wsgr.com) 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANDISK CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SANDISK CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MEMOREX PRODUCTS, INC., a California 

corporation, formerly d/b/a MEMTEC 

PRODUCTS, INC., a California corporation; 

PRETEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a 

California corporation. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: CV 01-4063 VRW 

STIPULATION OF SANDISK 

CORPORATION AND MEMOREX 

PRODUCTS, INC. AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE 

WHEREAS, on July 13, 2007, the Court issued a Pretrial Order setting the pretrial 

conference for October 9, 2007 and setting the trial to begin on November 5, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff SanDisk Corporation and Defendant Memorex Products, Inc, have 

agreed to set a schedule for pretrial deadlines; 

WHEREAS, Defendant Pretec Electronics Corporation takes no position regarding the 

pre-trial schedule and voices no objection; 

THEREFORE, SanDisk and Memorex hereby stipulate to the following schedule: 

(MODIFIED BY COURT)

Case 3:01-cv-04063-VRW Document 462 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION OF SANDISK AND MEMOREX AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRE-TRIAL 

SCHEDULE

-2- Memorex - Stip re pre-trial schedule_(PALIB1_3153554_1) (5) 

Fri., 9/14/07 Fact Discovery Ends 

Fri., 9/14/07 Last Day to File Motion to Compel 

Thurs., 9/20/07 Parties to exchange Expert Reports on issues on which they carry the 

burden of proof. 

Fri., 9/21/07 Last Day to File Dispositive Motion Deadline 

Tues., 9/25/07 Parties to exchange jury instructions, voir dire and form of verdict 

Tues., 9/25/07 Designation of deposition testimony 

Tues., 9/25/07 Identification of Exhibits and Witnesses 

Tues., 9/25/07 Motions in Limine 

Tues., 9/25/07 Joint pretrial conference statement and proposed findings of fact 

Fri., 9/28/07 Parties to exchange Rebuttal Reports. 

Tues., 10/2/07 Oppositions to Motions in Limine 

Tues., 10/2/07 Identification of Rebuttal Exhibits and Witnesses 

Tues., 10/2/07 Objections to Exhibits and Deposition Testimony 

Tues., 10/2/07 Counter Designations of deposition transcripts for rebuttal/impeachment 

Tues., 10/2/07 Parties to exchange objections to proposed jury instructions, voir dire and 

form of verdict 

Tues., 10/2/07 Objections to Rebuttal Exhibits and Counter Designations to Deposition 

Transcripts 

Fri., 10/5/07 Section 282 Notice 

Tues., 10/9/07 Pretrial Conference including motions in limine

Wed., 10/24/07 Expert discovery closes 

Mon., 11/5/07 Trial 

Wed. 11/14/2007 - Trial . Case to trail C05-5307 Nash V BARTD

Case 3:01-cv-04063-VRW Document 462 Filed 08/01/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION OF SANDISK AND MEMOREX AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRE-TRIAL 

SCHEDULE

-3- Memorex - Stip re pre-trial schedule_(PALIB1_3153554_1) (5) 

Dated: July 27, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Ryan R. Smith 

Ryan R. Smith 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SanDisk Corporation 

Dated: July 27, 2007 KEKER & VAN VEST, LLP 

By: 

Jon B. Streeter 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Memorex Products, Inc. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

 United States District Chief Judge

8/1/2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:01-cv-04063-VRW Document 462 Filed 08/01/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION OF SANDISK AND MEMOREX AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRE-TRIAL 

SCHEDULE

-1- Memorex - Stip re pre-trial schedule_(PALIB1_3153554_1) (5) 

I, Ryan R. Smith, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file this Joint Case Management Conference Statement. In compliance with General Order 

45.X.B, I hereby attest that Jon Streeter concurred in this filing. Counsel for Pretec stated that 

“Pretec can take no position re this and voices no objection.” 

Dated: July 27, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Ryan R. Smith 

Ryan R. Smith 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANDISK CORPORATION 

Case 3:01-cv-04063-VRW Document 462 Filed 08/01/07 Page 4 of 4