Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_98-cv-05723/USCOURTS-caed-1_98-cv-05723-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

ALVIN GITTISRIBOONGUL

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

MARIA G. CHAN, State Bar No. 192130

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 323-1940

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Davis, Carey, 

Papac, Marshall and Padilla

CF2001CX0040

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

CHARLES E. JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOM L. CAREY, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:98-cv-05723 AWI LJO

STIPULATION AND [ORDER

EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE

A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

The parties hereby stipulate to a second extension of the deadline for filing a reply to

Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The stipulation is based on

the following:

On February 22, 2006, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. The parties

stipulated to, and this Court granted, two extensions of time for Plaintiff to file an opposition to

the motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff timely filed an opposition to the motion for

summary judgment on May 30, 2006. Defendants’ reply was due on June 12, 2006. On June 6,

Case 1:98-cv-05723-AWI -GSA Document 154 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Effective July 1, 2006, the habeas team will no longer be a part of the Correctional Law

Section. The habeas team will become the Correctional Writs and Appeals Section, handling only

habeas litigation.

Stipulation

2

2006, the parties stipulated to a fifteen-day extension for Defendants to file a reply. The Court

granted the extension, thereby making the reply due on June 27, 2006.

Defendants seek an additional seven days to file a reply. Defense counsel, Deputy

Attorney General Maria Chan, recently moved to the habeas team, which was short staffed, and

has been taking on numerous habeas cases. While taking on additional habeas litigation, counsel

has been wrapping up work on numerous civil cases which will be re-assigned to other attorneys

on the civil teams in the Correctional Law Section1/. The instant case is one of the last civil cases

counsel has left. As a result, counsel has been unable to prepare the reply in this matter. As soon

as the reply is filed, the case will be re-assigned.

This case raises numerous complex legal and factual issues. Due to defense counsel’s

workload and other work commitments, Defendants need additional time to properly address

those issues. Defendants, therefore, seek an additional seven days to file a reply. 

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 1:98-cv-05723-AWI -GSA Document 154 Filed 06/28/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2. The seventh day is on July 4, 2006, which is a holiday. Therefore, the reply will be due

on July 5, 2006.

Stipulation

3

Accordingly, the parties stipulate to extending the date in which Defendants may file a

reply to the Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment to July 5, 20062/.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 22, 2006 /s/ Maria G. Chan 

MARIA G. CHAN

Deputy Attorney General

Attorney for Defendants

Dated: June 22, 2006 /s/ Alison E. Chase 

ALISON E. CHASE

O’Melveny & Myers LLP

Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:98-cv-05723-AWI -GSA Document 154 Filed 06/28/06 Page 3 of 3