Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-6_12-cv-00572/USCOURTS-alnd-6_12-cv-00572-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

JASPER DIVISION

DEVON LAMARR NIMOCK,

Plaintiff,

v.

WALKER COUNTY DISTRICT

COURT,

Defendant.

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

Case No. 6:12-CV-00572-RDP-TMP

ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

On December 7, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation in the

above-styled action recommending that this court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state

a claim for which relief can be granted. (Doc. # 12). Although objections to the Report and

Recommendation were due to be filed within fifteen (15) days, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), no

objections were filed. 

1

Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all of the materials in the court file,2

including the Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's

Report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. 

The court notes that in his Complaint, Plaintiff sought to be released from the Walker 1

County Jail. The court further notes that the docket reflects that mail addressed to Plaintiff at the

Walker County Jail was returned as undeliverable. 

The court notes that it was not required to conduct an independent review of the Report and 2

Recommendation in this case because no party has filed objections. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985)("It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court

review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when

neither party objects to those findings."). Nonetheless, the court has carefully reviewed the

Magistrate Judge's Report and agrees with his conclusions. 

FILED

 2013 Jan-03 AM 11:22

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 6:12-cv-00572-RDP-TMP Document 14 Filed 01/03/13 Page 1 of 3
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is DISMISSED

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and/or (2) for failure to state a claim for which relief can be

granted.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff at the address

listed on the docket sheet, as well as that address listed in his Complaint: 1203 G Beacon Pkwy E,

Birmingham, AL 35209.

DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of January, 2013.

___________________________________

R. DAVID PROCTOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2

Case 6:12-cv-00572-RDP-TMP Document 14 Filed 01/03/13 Page 2 of 3
United States Court of Appeals

Eleventh Circuit

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

John Ley In Replying Give Number

 Clerk Of Case and Names of Parties

NOTICE TO PRISONERS CONCERNING CIVIL APPEALS

 

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (effective April 26, 1996) now REQUIRES

that all prisoners pay the Court's $450 docket fee plus $5 filing fee (for a total of $455) when

appealing any civil judgment.

If you wish to appeal in a civil case that Act now requires that upon filing a notice of

appeal you either:

(1) Pay the total $455 fee to the clerk of the district court from which this case arose;

or

(2) arrange to have a prison official certify to the district court from which the appeal

arose the average monthly deposits and balances in your prison account for each

of the six months preceding the filing of a notice of appeal.

If you proceed with option (2) above, the Act requires that the district court order you to

pay an initial partial fee of at least 20% of the greater of either the average monthly deposits or

of the average monthly balances shown in your prison account. The remainder of the total $455

fee will thereafter be deducted from your prison account each month that your account balance

exceeds $10. Each such monthly deduction shall equal 20% of all deposits to your prison

account during the previous month, until the total $455 fee is paid. (If your prison account

statement shows that you cannot pay even the required initial partial fee, your appeal may

nevertheless proceed, BUT THE TOTAL $455 FEE WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST AND

WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM FUTURE DEPOSITS TO YOUR PRISON ACCOUNT.) 

Fees are not refundable, regardless of outcome, and deductions from your prison account

will continue until the total $455 fee is collected, even if an appeal is unsuccessful.

THOMAS K. KAHN

Clerk

 PLRA Notice

3

Case 6:12-cv-00572-RDP-TMP Document 14 Filed 01/03/13 Page 3 of 3