Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00026/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00026-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

STIPULATION RE: SERVICE AND RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, SCHEDULING OF 

RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE AND MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mark A. Wasser CA SB #060160 

LAW OFFICES OF MARK A. WASSER 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Phone: (916) 444-6400 

Fax: (916) 444-6405 

E-mail: mwasser@markwasser.com

Bernard C. Barman, Sr. 

KERN COUNTY COUNSEL 

Mark Nations, Chief Deputy 

1115 Truxton Avenue, Fourth Floor 

Bakersfield, CA 93301 

Phone: (661) 868-3800 

Fax: (661) 868-3805 

E-mail: mnations@co.kern.ca.us

Attorneys for Defendants County of Kern, 

Peter Bryan, Irwin Harris, Eugene Kercher, 

Jennifer Abraham, Scott Ragland, Toni Smith 

and William Roy 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O.

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF KERN, et al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 1:07-cv-26 

STIPULATION RE; SERVICE AND 

RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT, SCHEDULIG OF RULE 

26(f) CONFERENCE AND MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND 

ORDER 

It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel 

as follows: 

1. There are multiple Defendants in this action and they were not all served on the same 

date but they were all served by April 6, 2007. Given the varying service dates, the parties agree 

that all the Defendants may file an answer to the First Amended Complaint on or before April 

30, 2007. Plaintiff shall not be prejudiced with respect to the scheduling of discovery or trial. 

/ / / 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW -DLB Document 23 Filed 04/19/07 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION RE: SERVICE AND RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, SCHEDULING OF 

RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE AND MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Plaintiff may supplement his First Amended Complaint by adding factual allegations 

regarding a letter from the California Labor Commissioner and some other matters. The 

supplement will be filed on or before April 24, 2007. 

3. The parties will conduct the Rule 26(f) Conference on May 4, 2007 at a mutually 

agreeable time and location. 

4. In order that the parties have sufficient time to prepare effective initial disclosures and 

a discovery plan, the parties request that the Court re-schedule the Mandatory Scheduling 

Conference to May 31, 2007. 

Dated, April__ , 2007 LAW OFFICES OF MARK A. WASSER 

 By: 

 Mark A. Wasser 

 Attorney for Defendants, County of Kern, et al.

Dated: April , 2007 LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE LEE 

 By: 

 Eugene D. Lee 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, David F. Jadwin, D.O. 

ORDER

The parties having stipulated as hereinabove set forth and good cause appearing 

therefore; 

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference is reset to 5/31/07 at 8:45 

a.m. in Courtroom 3. 

Dated: April 18, 2007 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

 The Honorable Oliver W. Wanger 

 United States District Court Judge 

 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW -DLB Document 23 Filed 04/19/07 Page 2 of 2