Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00435/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00435-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROSENDA FOWLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

PARIS & PARIS LLP, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00435 ---JLT

ORDER CLOSING THE MATTER

(Doc. 9)

On May 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Doc. 9) In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as 

follows:

[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action with a court order by filing: (i) a notice of 

dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary 

judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). "The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or all 

of his claims, through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice," and the dismissal "automatically terminates the action 

as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 

692 (9th Cir. 1997). Because Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of before an answer or motion for 

summary judgment was filed by Defendants, this case has terminated. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

///

///

Case 1:15-cv-00435---JLT Document 10 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court is to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00435---JLT Document 10 Filed 05/18/15 Page 2 of 2