Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-03766/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-03766-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 320
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Soren Andersen,

Plaintiff,

 v.

Maia Young, et al.,

Defendants. /

NO. C 07-03766 JW 

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S

OBJECTION TO RESCHEDULED

HEARING

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s objection to the rescheduled hearing of Defendants’ motion to

dismiss. (See Docket Item No. 42.)

Defendants’ original motion was filed on August 31, 2007. (See Docket Item No. 17.) 

Defendants served the moving papers on Plaintiff via regular mail and email on August 31, 2007. 

(See Docket Item No. 20.) Defendants’ counsel states that the hard copies served via regular mail

were returned undelivered in late October. (See Docket Item No. 35.) Defendants’ counsel further

states that though the parties have been in contact via email, Plaintiff has not stipulated to waiving a

claim of prejudice based on the undelivered hard copies. (Id.)

A hearing on Defendants’ motion was scheduled for November 19, 2007. Plaintiff’s

opposition was due no later than October 29, 2007. See Civ. L.R. 7-3. Plaintiff filed his opposition

on October 31, 2007. (See Docket Item No. 39.)

On November 1, 2007, Defendants re-noticed their motion for the stated purpose of avoiding

any future challenges by Plaintiff regarding the proper service of their motion. (See Docket Item

No. 35.) Defendants noticed the motion for the hearing on January 14, 2008 at 9 A.M.

Case 5:07-cv-03766-JW Document 46 Filed 11/16/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Plaintiff states that he will not attend the hearing on November 19, 2007 or January 14, 2008

because he is not in the United States. (See Docket Item No. 42.) Therefore, the Court finds that no

prejudice or inconvenience will result to Plaintiff from rescheduling the hearing. Accordingly, the

Court OVERRULES Plaintiff’s Objection.

Dated: November 16, 2007 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:07-cv-03766-JW Document 46 Filed 11/16/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Jason A Catz jason.catz@pillsburylaw.com

Robert John Nolan robert.nolan@pillsburylaw.com

Sarah G. Flanagan sarah.flanagan@pillsburylaw.com

Soren Andersen

Postboks 1146

DK-1010

Copenhagen, DM

Denmark 

Dated: November 16, 2007 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: /s/ JW Chambers 

Elizabeth Garcia

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:07-cv-03766-JW Document 46 Filed 11/16/07 Page 3 of 3