Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00257/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00257-36/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHANN MEADOWS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DR. REEVES,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:11-cv-00257 JLT (PC)

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

AMEND RPETRIAL DEADLINES

(Doc. 122)

Counsel have filed a stipulation to extend the pretrial deadlines.1 (Doc. 122) The date 

counsel propose for the pretrial conference would leave insufficient time for filing, opposing and 

hearing motions in limine. Thus, though the Court will extend the deadlines, the Court must set 

some pretrial deadlines at this time. Consequently, the Court ORDERS:

1. Plaintiff’s pretrial statement, including any motions for attendance of incarcerated 

witnesses and motions for attendance of unincarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify 

voluntarily, SHALL be filed no later than February 24, 2017;

2. Defendant’s pretrial statement and any opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for 

 

1 The Court notes that the plaintiff indicates that she intends to file a motion to amend her complaint to name the 

CDCR for purposes of seeking injunctive relief. The Court makes no comment as to the likelihood of success for 

such a motion. However, the Court notes that despite the passage of the deadline to amend pleadings (Doc. 53 at 2), 

despite that the plaintiff originally sought this relief against this defendant but chose to proceed without these claims 

(Doc. 41) and despite the passage of nearly three weeks since this topic was first introduced by plaintiff’s counsel

(Doc. 119), plaintiff has taken no action to seek to amend the pleading.

Case 1:11-cv-00257-JLT Document 123 Filed 01/17/17 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

attendance of witnesses SHALL be filed no later than March 24, 2017;

3. If any inmate witness is discovered after February 24, 2017, Plaintiff may file a

supplemental motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses. However, any such motion 

SHALL be filed no later than March 28, 20172, and SHALL set forth good cause for the late 

filing. If such a motion is filed, the defendant’s objections SHALL be filed no later than April 4, 

2017;

4. The pretrial conference is continued to April 3, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.;

5. No later than March 28, 2017, the parties SHALL exchange exhibit lists via email or fax. A copy of any exhibit not previously disclosed, SHALL be provided with the exhibit 

list;

4. No later than March 28, 2017, the parties SHALL exchange witness lists via email or fax; 

5. Any party may file motions in limine. The purpose of a motion in limine is to 

establish in advance of the trial that certain evidence should not be offered at trial. “Although the 

Federal Rules of Evidence do not explicitly authorize in limine rulings, the practice has developed 

pursuant to the district court’s inherent authority to manage the course of trials.” Luce v. United 

States, 469 U.S. 38, 40 n. 2 (1984); Jonasson v. Lutheran Child and Family Services, 115 F. 3d 

436, 440 (7th Cir. 1997). The Court will grant a motion in limine, and thereby bar use of the 

evidence in question, only if the moving party establishes that the evidence clearly is not 

admissible for any valid purpose. Id. 

Any motions in limine must be filed with the Court by April 7, 2017. The motion must 

clearly identify the nature of the evidence that the moving party seeks to prohibit the other side 

from offering at trial. Any opposition to the motion must be served on the other party, and filed 

with the Court by April 14, 2017. No replies are authorized. The Court sets a hearing on the 

 

2 The Court observes that if such a motion is not filed until this late date, it is possible that even if the motion is 

granted, there will be insufficient time to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses at trial. Generally, the 

Court must give the custodial officer at least four weeks’ notice to ensure that a prisoner can be transported. Thus, 

the plaintiff is urged to file her motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses as soon as possible. Her failure to 

do so may result in the Court determining that it lacks the ability to provide the relief sought.

Case 1:11-cv-00257-JLT Document 123 Filed 01/17/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

motions in limine on April 17, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. Appearances via Courtcall are authorized.

In advance of filing any motion in limine, counsel SHALL meet and confer to determine 

whether they can resolve any disputes and avoid filing motions in limine. Along with their 

motions in limine, the parties SHALL file a certification demonstrating counsel have in good 

faith met and conferred and attempted to resolve the dispute. Failure to provide the 

certification may result in the Court refusing to entertain the motion;

5. The parties SHALL serve, via e-mail or fax, their joint proposed jury instructions 

in accordance with Local Rule 163 and their joint proposed verdict form on one another no later 

than April 14, 2017. The parties shall conduct a conference to address their proposed jury 

instructions and verdict form no later than March 28, 2017. 

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00257-JLT Document 123 Filed 01/17/17 Page 3 of 3