Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00976/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00976-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONATHAN ROBERTSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:23-cv-00975 NODJ GSA (PC)

ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING JOINT 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND GRANTING MOTION TO DO SAME

(ECF No. 30)

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT DUE MARCH 4, 2024

FANCY MOORE LIPSEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:23-cv-00976 NODJ GSA (PC)

ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING JOINT 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND GRANTING MOTION TO DO SAME

(ECF No. 27)

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT DUE MARCH 4, 2024

Case 1:23-cv-00976-JLT-GSA Document 28 Filed 02/26/24 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

CRYSTAL GRAHAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:23-cv-01323 NODJ GSA (PC)

ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING JOINT 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND GRANTING MOTION TO DO SAME

(ECF No. 20)

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT DUE MARCH 4, 2024

ROXANNE PURDAGONE,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:23-cv-01324 NODJ GSA (PC)

ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING JOINT 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND GRANTING MOTION TO DO SAME

(ECF No. 17)

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT DUE MARCH 4, 2024

The above-referenced matters have been referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Each of these matters is currently at 

the pleading phase of the proceedings.

In each of these matters the parties have signed joint stipulations which agree that 

Plaintiffs in each of them shall have until March 4, 2024, to file their respective amended 

complaints. See Robertson, ECF No. 30; Lipsey, ECF No. 27; Graham, ECF No. 20, and 

Purdagone, ECF No. 17. The stipulations were agreed to and the related proposed orders were 

filed in each case due to the fact that each Plaintiff is incarcerated, and as a result, counsel for 

Plaintiffs needs additional time to meet with each respective Plaintiff in order to gather additional 

facts in support of the claims they have brought against Defendants. See generally id.

The parties agree that they will not be prejudiced by grants of extensions of time to file the 

respective amended complaints. See generally Robertson, ECF No. 30; Lipsey, ECF No. 27; 

Case 1:23-cv-00976-JLT-GSA Document 28 Filed 02/26/24 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Graham, ECF No. 20, and Purdagone, ECF No. 17. Proposed orders acknowledging that joint 

stipulations have been agreed to are attached to the stipulations in each case.

The Court construes the parties’ joint stipulations and their attached proposed orders

collectively as motions for extensions of time to file amended complaints in each matter. Good 

cause appearing, each of the motions will be granted.

Accordingly, the Court ACKNOWLEDGES that each of the above-referenced parties 

have jointly stipulated to extensions of time for Plaintiffs to file amended complaints, and

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court CONSTRUES the stipulations and proposed orders in each of the matters 

identified below as motions for extensions of time to file for Plaintiffs to file amended 

complaints:

• Robertson v. State of California, 1:23-cv-00975 NODJ GSA (ECF No. 30);

• Lipsey v. State of California, 1:23-cv-00976 NODJ GSA (ECF No. 27);

• Graham v. State of California, 1:23-cv-01323 NODJ GSA (ECF No. 20), and

• Purdagone v. State of California, 1:23-cv-01324 NODJ GSA (ECF No. 17);

2. The Clerk of Court shall correct the docket in each of the above-referenced cases to 

reflect that the above-referenced docket entries are joint stipulated motions for extensions of time 

(i.e., add gavels next to each docket entry identified above);

3. The above-referenced motions for extensions of time to file amended complaints are 

GRANTED, and

4. The amended complaints in each of the four above-referenced matters shall be filed no 

later than March 4, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 26, 2024 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:23-cv-00976-JLT-GSA Document 28 Filed 02/26/24 Page 3 of 3