Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05116/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05116-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

THIRD JOINT STATUS REPORT CONCERNING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – C03 5116 VRW

Russell L. Johnson (SBN 053833) 

rljohnson@sidley.com

Peter H. Kang (SBN 158101) 

pkang@sidley.com

Teague I. Donahey (SBN 197531) 

tdonahey@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

William J. Bohler (SBN 141970) 

wjbohler@townsend.com 

Gregory S. Bishop (SBN 184680) 

gsbishop@townsend.com 

Igor Shoiket (SBN 190066) 

ishoiket@townsend.com 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400 

Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CARSEM (M) SDN BHD, CARSEM SEMICONDUCTOR SDN BHD, and CARSEM INC., 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CARSEM (M) SDN BHD, CARSEM 

SEMICONDUCTOR SDN BHD, and 

CARSEM INC., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 

Case No. C-03-5116 VRW 

THIRD JOINT STATUS REPORT 

CONCERNING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

Case 3:03-cv-05116-VRW Document 22 Filed 08/01/2005 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-05116-WHA Document 23 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

THIRD JOINT STATUS REPORT CONCERNING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – C03 5116 VRW 2

Pursuant to the Court’s request, the parties hereby submit a Third Joint Status Report 

Concerning Stay of Proceedings. The parties are continuing to litigate their dispute before the U.S. 

International Trade Commission (“ITC”) in the investigation styled In the Matter of Certain 

Encapsulated Integrated Circuit Devices and Products Containing Same, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-501. 

The Administrative Law Judge issued an Initial Determination on November 18, 2004. Thereafter, 

on February 1, 2005, the ITC decided to review the ALJ’s Initial Determination and extended the 

target date for completion of the investigation until March 31, 2005. After review, the ITC 

modified the ALJ’s claim construction regarding certain terms, and remanded the investigation back 

to the ALJ for further findings in light of these changes. On July 26, 2005, the ITC issued an Order 

extending the target date for completion of the investigation to February 9, 2006. 

Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659, the parties respectfully request that the Stay Order 

remain in effect until the determination of the Commission in the ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-501 becomes 

final. 

Pursuant to General Order 45(X), Plaintiff obtained concurrence in the filing of this 

document from counsel for Defendants, as listed below. 

SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP 

By: /s/ Teague I. Donahey 

Dated: August 1, 2005 

Teague I. Donahey 

Attorneys For Plaintiff 

Amkor Technology, Inc. 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

By: /s/ Igor Shoiket 

Dated: August 1, 2005 

Igor Shoiket 

Attorneys For Defendants 

Carsem (M) Sdn Bhd, Carsem Semiconductor 

Sdn Bhd, and Carsem Inc. 

Case 3:03-cv-05116-VRW Document 22 Filed 08/01/2005 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-05116-WHA Document 23 Filed 08/18/05 Page 2 of 2