Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01070/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01070-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Case No. C 10-01070 JW

Aaron L. Agenbroad (State Bar No. 242613) 

alagenbroad@jonesday.com 

Catherine Nasser (State Bar No. 246191) 

cnasser@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY 

555 California Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 626-3939 

Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 

Matthew W. Lampe (admitted pro hac vice) 

mwlampe@jonesday.com 

Wendy C. Butler (admitted pro hac vice) 

wbutler@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY 

222 East 41st Street 

New York, NY 10017 

Telephone: (212) 326-3939 

Facsimile: (212) 755-7306 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 

MACHINES CORPORATION 

Alan B. Bayer (State Bar No. 216706) 

alanbayer@aol.com 

Heather E. Borlase (State Bar No. 216729) 

heatherborlase@aol.com 

BAYER & BORLASE 

912 Cole Street, #238 

San Francisco, CA 94117 

Telephone: (415) 558-9960 

Facsimile: (415) 558-9970 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MAY MOUA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MAY MOUA, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, and for the 

interest of the general public, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 

MACHINES CORPORATION, a 

California business entity, form unknown, 

JOSEPH KOENIG, an Individual and 

DOES l-200, 

Defendant.

Case No. C 10-01070 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Pursuant to ADR Local Rule 2-3 and Civil Local Rule 7-12, all parties to this action, 

through their duly authorized undersigned counsel, stipulate and request as follows: 

WHEREAS, on August 30, 2010, the parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 

Case 5:10-cv-01070-EJD Document 25 Filed 12/13/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS - 2 - 

Case No. C 10-01070 JW

Selecting ADR Process, choosing private mediation as the preferred method of alternative dispute 

resolution. (Docket No. 13.) 

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2010, the Court entered an Order referring the abovecaptioned matter to private mediation to be completed on or before December 30, 2010. (Docket 

No. 14.) 

WHEREAS, after a meaningful and diligent effort to select an agreed-upon private 

mediator, including the exchange of information related to potential mediators, the parties have 

been unable to agree upon a private mediator at this time. 

WHEREAS, both parties believe that this matter may be better suited for the Court ADR 

process, specifically, mediation pursuant to ADR Local Rule 6. 

WHEREAS, subject to the appointed mediator's availability, the parties agree to hold the 

mediation within sixty (60) days from the date of referral. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel: 

1. The parties shall participate in a Court sponsored mediation pursuant to ADR 

Local Rule 6. 

2. Subject to the appointed mediator's availability, the parties shall hold the ADR 

session within sixty (60) days from the date of referral. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 

Dated: December 10, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

Jones Day 

By: /S/ Catherine S. Nasser 

Catherine S. Nasser 

Counsel for Defendant 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 

CORPORATION 

Case 5:10-cv-01070-EJD Document 25 Filed 12/13/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS - 3 - 

Case No. C 10-01070 JW

Dated: December 9, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

Bayer & Borlase 

By: /S/ Alan B. Bayer 

Alan B. Bayer 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

MAY MOUA 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: _____________, 2010 

 __________________________ 

 Hon. James Ware 

 United States District Court Judge 

SFI-655865v1 

December 13

Case 5:10-cv-01070-EJD Document 25 Filed 12/13/10 Page 3 of 3