Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-05514/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-05514-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID GUERRA,

Plaintiff,

v.

LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-05514-PJH 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TRO 

AS MOOT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 22

Before the court is a joint letter from the parties in this case, indicating that they 

have reached an agreement which “will moot the claims” in plaintiff’s application for a 

temporary restraining order (TRO). Dkt. 22. Accordingly, the court DENIES plaintiff’s 

application for a TRO (Dkt. 19) as moot, given the agreement.

The letter does not address plaintiff’s pending motion for a preliminary injunction 

(Dkt. 7). Although the court denied the motion to shorten time regarding this motion, Dkt. 

18, the motion for a preliminary injunction itself remains pending. The parties are hereby 

ORDERED to inform the court, no later than October 17, 2016, whether, in light of their 

agreement, this motion is moot as well.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 13, 2016

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:16-cv-05514-PJH Document 23 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 1