Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00788/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00788-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SASHA GIVERTS, et al., 

Plaintiffs, No. C 10-0788 PJH

v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING CO.,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

On February 25, 2010, this court dismissed without prejudice plaintiff’s complaint

and denied plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was advised to file

an amended complaint no later than March 29, 2010 or the case would be dismissed with

prejudice. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by that date.

The court has considered the five factors set forth in Malone v. United States Postal

Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987), and has determined that notwithstanding the

public policy favoring the disposition of actions on their merits, the court's need to manage

its docket and the public interest in the expeditious resolution of the instant litigation require

dismissal of this action. In view of plaintiff's lack of response to this court's prior order, the

court finds there is no appropriate less drastic sanction. 

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro.

41(b) for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2010 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00788-PJH Document 11 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 1