Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01892/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01892-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HEBER D. PERRETT,

Appellant,

v.

CLARENCE L. GUNTER, et al, 

Appellees.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

DISTRICT COURT CASE 

NO. CIV-F-06-1892 AWI

BANKRUPTCY COURT CASE

NO. 05-16471 A-13F

ADVERSARY PROCEEDING

NO. 05-01264

ORDER RE: VACATING HEARING

FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

The matter is a bankruptcy appeal. On May 24, 2007, Appellant filed a notice of

readiness for oral argument. Doc. 22. By minute order, the court scheduled oral argument for

June 25, 2007. Doc. 23. Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8012 states:

Oral argument shall be allowed in all cases unless the district judge or the judges of the

bankruptcy appellate panel unanimously determine after examination of the briefs and

record, or appendix to the brief, that oral argument is not needed. Any party shall have an

opportunity to file a statement setting forth the reason why oral argument should be

allowed.

Oral argument will not be allowed if (1) the appeal is frivolous; (2) the dispositive issue

or set of issues has been recently authoritatively decided; or (3) the facts and legal

arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and the decisional process

would not be significantly aided by oral argument.

The court has reviewed the papers filed and has determined that oral argument is not necessary as

the facts and legal arguments are adequately addressed. Should any party affirmatively wish to

Case 1:06-cv-01892-AWI Document 26 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

have oral argument, they may file a statement in accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. Proc. 8012. The

court will thereafter consider the request. Oral argument is vacated and the appeal is taken under

submission.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 21, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01892-AWI Document 26 Filed 06/21/07 Page 2 of 2