Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02080/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02080-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Default

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SunTrust Bank,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

Allen W. Warren; Yankee Dawdle,

LLC,

 Defendants.

________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2:12-cv-02080-GEB-CKD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND

CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL

SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

The August 9, 2012, Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling)

Conference scheduled a status conference in this case on November 26,

2012, and required the parties to file a joint status report no later

than fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference. The August

9th Order further required that a status report be filed regardless of

whether a joint report could be procured. No status report was filed as

ordered.

Therefore, Plaintiff is Ordered to Show Cause (“OSC”) in a

writing to be filed no later than November 26, 2012, why sanctions

should not be imposed against it and/or its counsel under Rule 16(f) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to file a timely status

report. The written response shall also state whether Plaintiff or its

counsel is at fault, and whether a hearing is requested on the OSC. If 1

“If the fault lies with the attorney, that is where the impact 1

(continued...)

1

Case 2:12-cv-02080-CKD Document 11 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

a hearing is requested, it will be held on January 14, 2013, at 9:00

a.m., just prior to the status conference, which is rescheduled to that

date and time. A joint status report shall be filed no later than

fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 14, 2012

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge

(...continued) 1

of sanction should be lodged. If the fault lies with the clients, that

is where the impact of the sanction should be lodged.” Matter of

Sanction of Baker, 744 F.2d 1438, 1442 (10th Cir. 1984), cert. denied,

471 U.S. 1014 (1985). Sometimes the faults of attorneys, and their

consequences, are visited upon clients. In re Hill, 775 F.2d 1385, 1387

(9th Cir. 1985).

2

Case 2:12-cv-02080-CKD Document 11 Filed 11/15/12 Page 2 of 2