Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05831/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05831-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FO

SO

mo

For

it m

sid

“po

For

con

con

par

by 

Th

Da

ORTINET, I

v. 

OPHOS, INC

Fortine

otion to seal.

In the f

rtinet’s prop

makes sense 

des have had 

otentially [un

rtinet’s prop

Fortine

nfer immedi

ntentions. If

rties shall fil

June 11, 20

e court will 

IT IS S

ated: June 4, 

INC., 

Plaintiff, 

C., et al., 

Defendants

t has filed a 

 [Docket No

first motion, 

posed amend

to allow som

the benefit o

n]opposed.” 

posed amend

t’s motions a

ately, in pers

f the parties 

le a joint disc

015, followin

then schedu

SO ORDER

2015 

UNITED

NORTHER

s. 

motion for l

os. 134, 135

Fortinet des

dments, and n

me limited am

of additional

 However, b

ded infringem

are denied w

son or by tel

are unable to

covery letter

ng this court

le a hearing 

RED. 

 

D STATES D

RN DISTRIC

leave to ame

.] The moti

scribes the pa

notes that So

mendments 

l discovery.”

because Sop

ment charts, 

without prej

lephone, abo

o resolve the

r of no more

’s standing o

on any joint

 ______

Donna

United

DISTRICT C

CT OF CALI

Case No. 1

ORDER D

LEAVE T

CONTENT

SEAL WIT

Re: Dkt. N

end its infrin

ion has been 

arties’ effort

ophos stated

to [the] infri

” Fortinet al

phos did not 

Fortinet file

judice. The

out Fortinet’

eir dispute w

e than eight

order on disc

t discovery l

__________

a M. Ryu 

d States Mag

COURT 

IFORNIA 

13-cv-05831

DENYING M

O AMEND

TIONS AND

THOUT PR

Nos. 134, 135

ngement cont

n referred to t

ts to meet an

d, on May 14

ingement co

lso states tha

respond in a

ed its motion

e parties are 

s proposed a

without judic

t pages on an

covery dispu

letter if nece

___________

gistrate Judge

1-EMC (DM

MOTION F

D INFRINGE

D MOTION

REJUDICE

5

tentions and

the undersig

nd confer abo

4, 2015: “We

ontentions no

at its motion

a timely fash

n. 

directed to m

amended inf

cial intervent

ny remaining

utes. See Do

essary. 

__________

e 

MR) 

FOR 

EMENT 

N TO 

d a related 

gned. 

out 

e agree that 

ow that both

n is 

hion to 

meet and 

fringement 

tion, the 

g disputes 

ocket No. 78

______ 

8. 

Case 3:13-cv-05831-EMC Document 143 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 1