Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02452/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02452-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD CRAWFORD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2452 WBS KJM PS

vs.

WE HALL, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed May 4, 2005, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and

thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. On May 12, 1005 and August

4, 2005 plaintiff filed documents with the court that do not comply with the May 4th order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02452-WBS -KJM Document 25 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 15, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

craw2452.fta

Case 2:04-cv-02452-WBS -KJM Document 25 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2