Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-01968/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-01968-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence

---

STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

17-089/PLEADING.022 - 1 -

CSP;RLM:kc

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CHARLES S. PAINTER (SBN 89045)

REBECCA L. MENENDEZ (SBN 262487)

ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT

100 Howe Avenue, Suite 110 South

Sacramento, CA 95825-8201

(916) 483-5181 Telephone

(916) 483-7558 Facsimile

Attorneys for Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, PAPÉ TRUCKS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGER DRIVER, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

PAPÉ TRUCKS, INC. AN OREGON 

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:17-CV-01968- KJN

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO MODIFY 

SCHEDULING ORDER

Action Filed: 09/21/2017 

Trial Date: 12/07/2021

WHEREAS plaintiff filed his complaint on September 21, 2017. 

WHEREAS on March 9, 2018 this court issues its Pre-Trial Scheduling Order which 

indicated, among other things, “... that this order shall not be modified except by leave of court 

upon a showing of good cause.... “

WHEREAS the court previously modified the order for good cause and issued the current 

operative scheduling order on June 25, 2020;

WHEREAS the parties have agreed and stipulated, by and through their respective 

undersigned counsel, that due to a delay in completing discovery as a result of the pandemic, 

the current scheduling order be modified as follows: 

//

//

//

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 64 Filed 07/01/21 Page 1 of 4
 

STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

17-089/PLEADING.022 - 2 -

CSP;RLM:kc

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 2:17-CV-01968-KJN

Case Name: DRIVER V. PAPE TRUCKS, INC., et al. 

MATTER CURRENT DATE PROPOSED NEW 

DATE 

COURT’S 

ORDER 

LAW AND 

MOTION (EXCEPT 

FOR DISCOVERY 

MOTIONS)

October 6, 2021 March 7, 2022 March 7, 2022

EXPERT 

DISCLOSURES 

July 6, 2021 December 6, 2021 December 6, 2021

EXPERT 

DISCLOSURE 

REBUTTAL 

August 4, 2021 January 4, 2022 January 4, 2022

DISCOVERY CUT 

OFF 

September 10, 2021 February 7, 2022 February 7, 2022

FINAL PRE-TRIAL 

CONFERNECE 

October 20, 2021 March 21, 2022 (none set)

JURY TRIAL December 7, 2021 May 9, 2022 (none set)

DATED: June 30, 2021 

By

ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT

CHARLES S. PAINTER

REBECCA L. MENENDEZ

Attorneys for Defendant, PAPÉ TRUCKS, INC.

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 64 Filed 07/01/21 Page 2 of 4
 

STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

17-089/PLEADING.022 - 3 -

CSP;RLM:kc

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: June 30, 2021

By

CUTTER LAW P.C.

/s/ Celine E. Cutter as authorized on 

6/30/2021 

C. BROOKS CUTTER

CELINE E. CUTTER

Attorneys for Plaintiff, ROGER DRIVER

DATED: June 29, 2021 GIBSON ROBB & LINDH LLP

/s/ R. Hudson Hollister as authorized on 

6/29/2021 By _________________________________

JOSHUA E. KIRSCH 

R. HUDSON HOLLISTER

Attorneys for Plaintiff-In-Intervention,

ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF AMERICA

DATED: June 29, 2021 WOOD SMITH HENNING & BERMAN, LLP

/s/ C.G. Brandon Gnekow as authorized 

on 6/29/2021

By __________________________________

CARLA N. BRAUNSTEIN 

C.G. BRANDON GNEKOW

Attorneys for Third Party Defendant 

JOMAR INVESTMENTS, INC. 

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the court finds good cause to modify the scheduling 

order (ECF No. 61) and adopts the amended deadlines proposed by the parties as set forth in 

the chart above. The undersigned declines to set final pretrial conference and trial dates at this 

juncture, however. Instead, the court orders the parties to submit a Joint Notice of Trial 

Readiness on one of the following timelines:

A. After resolution of any pending dispositive motions, the parties are to submit the Notice 

not later than thirty (30) days after receiving the ruling(s) on the last filed dispositive 

motion(s); or 

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 64 Filed 07/01/21 Page 3 of 4
 

STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

17-089/PLEADING.022 - 4 -

CSP;RLM:kc

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

B. If the parties do not intend to file dispositive motions, the parties are ordered to file the 

Notice not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after the close of discovery, and 

the notice must include statements of intent to forgo the filing of dispositive motions. 

In the Joint Notice of Trial Readiness, the parties are to set forth the appropriateness of special 

procedures, their estimated trial length, any request for a jury, their availability for trial, and if 

the parties are willing to attend a settlement conference. The Notice shall also estimate how 

many court days each party will require to present its case, including opening statements and 

closing arguments. The parties’ estimate shall include time necessary for jury selection, time 

necessary to finalize jury instructions and instruct the jury. After review of the parties’ Joint 

Notice of Trial Readiness, the court will issue an order that sets forth dates for a final pretrial 

conference and trial.

Dated: July 1, 2021

driv.1968

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 64 Filed 07/01/21 Page 4 of 4