Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00785/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00785-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

Kroeung v. Johnson, et al. Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

No. 2:15-cv-00785-KJN 1 Dismissing Case as Moot

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, #122664

Federal Defender

CAROLYN M. WIGGIN, #182732

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel: 916-498-5700/Fax 916-498-5710 

Attorneys for Petitioner

SONGKRA KROEUNG

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SONGKRA KROEUNG,

 Petitioner,

 vs.

JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, ET AL.,

 Respondent.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:15-cv-00785 KJN

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO DISMISS PETITION AS MOOT

Judge: Hon. Kendall J. Newman

Petitioner Songkra Kroeung’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenged his detention by 

the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”).

Mr. Kroeung has now been deported to Cambodia and is no longer in ICE custody. Mr. 

Kroeung’s challenge to his detention is therefore moot.

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 2:15-cv-00785-KJN Document 22 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 2
Kroeung v. Johnson, et al. Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

No. 2:15-cv-00785-KJN 2 Dismissing Case as Moot

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c), the parties consent to the United States Magistrate 

Judge entering a final order dismissing this case.

Dated: October 20, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

HEATHER E. WILLIAMS

Federal Defender

/s/ Carolyn M. Wiggin

CAROLYN M. WIGGIN

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Petitioner

SONGKRA KROEUNG

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

/s/ Audrey B. Hemesath

Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for the Respondents

_______________________________________________

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the petition be dismissed as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 27, 2015

/kroe0785.stip.dism

Case 2:15-cv-00785-KJN Document 22 Filed 10/27/15 Page 2 of 2