Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00655/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00655-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEWAYNE THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:13-cv-00655-AWI-SKO (PC)

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW 

CAUSE AND DIRECTING CLERK’S 

OFFICE TO AMEND DOCKET TO 

REFLECT WITHDRAWAL OF PENDING 

MOTIONS

(Docs. 31-33)

Plaintiff DeWayne Thompson (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 6, 2013. This action 

for damages is proceeding on Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint against Defendants Felix, 

Harmon, Pendergrass, Cruz, and Brodie (“Defendants”) for violation of the Eighth Amendment of 

the United States Constitution. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

On August 20, 2015, Defendants filed a motion seeking revocation of Plaintiff’s in forma 

pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and a motion to stay the proceedings pending 

resolution of their section 1915(g) motion. On August 24, 2015, the Court relieved Plaintiff of his 

obligation to respond and ordered Defendants to show cause within fifteen days why their motions 

should not be summarily denied given that two of the strikes accrued after this suit was brought. 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Coleman v. Tollefson, __ U.S. __, __, 135 S.Ct. 1759, 1761-63 (2015). 

Defendants filed a response and a notice of withdrawal of the motions on September 4, 2015.

Case 1:13-cv-00655-AWI-SKO Document 37 Filed 09/08/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Based on Defendants’ response, the order to show cause is HEREBY DISCHARGED, and 

the Clerk’s Office shall amend the docket to reflect withdrawal of the motions filed on August 20, 

2015.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 8, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

1 Defendants also filed an answer, and a separate discovery and scheduling order will be issued.

Case 1:13-cv-00655-AWI-SKO Document 37 Filed 09/08/15 Page 2 of 2