Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00460/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00460-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YUJUAN L. BANKS, SR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

U.C. REGENTS, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2: 14-cv-0460 TLN KJN P

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 10, 2014, the court ordered the U.S. Marshal to serve the complaint 

on defendants. Process directed to defendants Rashid, Stuber and Modjtahedi was returned 

unserved because they were not at the address given. Accordingly, on July 23, 2014, the court 

granted plaintiff sixty days to provide the court with additional information to serve these 

defendants.

On October 20, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for judicial intervention. In this motion, 

plaintiff alleges that despite diligent efforts, he was unable to obtain additional information to 

serve defendants Rashid, Stuber and Modjtahedi. Plaintiff requests court assistance in locating 

these defendants.

The court has located information regarding the location of defendants Stuber and 

Modjtahedi and will direct the U.S. Marshal to serve these defendants. However, the court is 

Case 2:14-cv-00460-TLN-KJN Document 38 Filed 01/08/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

unable to locate information regarding the location of defendant Rashid. Accordingly, plaintiff is 

ordered to show cause why defendant Rashid should not be dismissed because service of this 

defendant cannot be effected.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for judicial intervention is granted (ECF No. 29); and 

2. Plaintiff is granted twenty-one days from the date of this order to show cause why 

defendant Rashid should not be dismissed because service of this defendant cannot be effected.

Dated: January 8, 2015

Bank460.ord

Case 2:14-cv-00460-TLN-KJN Document 38 Filed 01/08/15 Page 2 of 2