Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03667/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03667-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

333 Bush Street 

34th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

415.433.1940 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC 

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE 

ROBERT G. HULTENG, Bar No. 071293

rhulteng@littler.com 

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998 

aspurchise@littler.com 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

333 Bush Street, 34th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: 415.433.1940 

Facsimile: 415.399.8490 

RACHAEL LAVI, Bar No. 294443 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107 

Telephone: 310.553.0308 

Fax No.: 310.553.5583 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

RASIER-CA, LLC 

[Additional counsel listed on next page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICARDO DEL RIO, a California 

resident, on behalf of himself, the proposed 

class and collective class; JOSE 

VALDIVIA, a California resident, on 

behalf of himself, the proposed class and 

collective class; JOSE PEREIRA, a 

California resident, on behalf of himself, 

the proposed class and collective class, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation, RASIER-CA, LLC, 

a Delaware Limited Liability Company, 

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC 

[Related to 3:13-cv-03826-EMC]

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 STATUS 

CONFERENCE TO OCTOBER 18, 2016; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Complaint Filed: August 11, 2015 

FAC Filed: September 21, 2015 

SAC Filed: April 27, 2016 

Trial Date: None set 

Case 3:15-cv-03667-EMC Document 106 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 4
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

333 Bush Street 

34th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

415.433.1940 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC 

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE 

CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER (SBN 197117) 

chamner@hamnerlaw.com 

AMY T. WOOTTON (SBN 188856) 

awootton@hamnerlaw.com 

HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC 

555 W. 5th Street, 31st Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90013 

Telephone: 213.533-4160 

Facsimile: 213.533-4167 

MARK J. GERAGOS, SBN 108325 

mark@geragos.com 

BENJAMIN MEISELAS, SBN 227412 

meiselas@geragos.com 

GERAGOS & GERAGOS, APC 

644 South Figueroa Street 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (213) 625-3900 

Facsimile: (213) 232-3255 

BRIAN S. KABATECK, SBN 152054 

bsk@kbklawyers.com 

SHANT A. KARNIKIAN, SBN 285048 

sk@kbklawyers.com 

KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP 

644 South Figueroa Street 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (213) 217-5000 

Facsimile: (213) 217-5010 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

RICARDO DEL RIO, JOSE VALDIVIA and JOSE PEREIRA 

Case 3:15-cv-03667-EMC Document 106 Filed 09/07/16 Page 2 of 4
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

333 Bush Street 

34th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

415.433.1940 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1. Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC 

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE 

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

Plaintiffs Ricardo Del Rio, Jose Valdivia, and Jose Pereira (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and 

Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier-CA, LLC (“Uber”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by 

and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, on June 2, 2016, the Court granted a temporary stay, staying this matter in its 

entirety. The parties were ordered to meet and confer regarding the status of the case and the effect 

of the Court’s order regarding preliminary approval of the proposed settlement in O’Connor v. Uber 

Technologies, Inc., Northern District Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC (“O’Connor”), and provide a joint 

submission to the Court after the order is issued to provide the parties’ position with respect to its 

impact on the case and whether the stay should continue or be lifted; 

WHEREAS, on August 18, 2016, the Court issued an order denying preliminary approval of 

the proposed settlement in O’Connor; 

WHEREAS, on August 19, 2016, the Court reset the Further Case Management Conference 

in this matter from September 9, 2016 to September 15, 2016 at 10:30 a.m.; 

WHEREAS, Uber’s counsel is unavailable due to prior commitments on September 15, 

2016; 

WHEREAS, in O’Connor, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to continue the status 

conference in that matter, and continued the status conference to October 18, 2016 at 10:30 a.m.; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred, and agree that, subject to the approval of 

this Court, because case management decisions in O’Connor could impact the proceedings in this 

matter, the Status Conference in this matter should be continued to October 18, 2016 at 10:30 a.m., 

and a joint Case Management Statement shall be due by October 11, 2016. Defendants contend the 

stay should remain in place in light of the ongoing settlement discussions in O’Connor. O’Connor v. 

Uber Technologies, Inc., 13-cv-03826-EMC (C.D. Cal), Dkt. 751. Plaintiffs contend the stay should 

be lifted in light of the denial of the motion for preliminary approval in O'Connor. Plaintiffs have 

not been invited to attend any mediation or included in any settlement discussions, and therefore, 

any continued stay appears inappropriate. The parties will be prepared to discuss this with the Court 

Case 3:15-cv-03667-EMC Document 106 Filed 09/07/16 Page 3 of 4
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

333 Bush Street 

34th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

415.433.1940 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC 

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE 

at the CMC, and will submit a proposed schedule in their Joint CMC Statement in the event the 

Court decides at the CMC to lift the stay. 

Dated: September 2, 2016. 

/s/ Rachael Lavi ROBERT G. HULTENG 

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE 

RACHAEL LAVI 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND 

RASIER-CA, LLC 

Dated: September 2, 2016 

/s/ Christopher J. Hamner 

CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER 

AMY T. WOOTTON 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

RICARDO DEL RIO JOSE VALDIVIA and 

JOSE PEREIRA 

ATTESTATION OF FILER 

I, Rachael Lavi, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from 

each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. 

Signed this 2nd day of September, 2016. 

/s/ Rachael Lavi _____________ RACHAEL LAVI 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________, 2016 _________________ 

_________________________________ JUDGE EDWARD CHEN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Firmwide:142530958.2 073208.1083 

September 7

Case 3:15-cv-03667-EMC Document 106 Filed 09/07/16 Page 4 of 4