Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00180/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00180-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL F. SCHULZE, CASE NO. CV-F-05-0180 AWI LJO

Plaintiff, FURTHER ORDER ON SERVICE

OF SUMMONS AND AMENDED

vs. COMPLAINT

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff Michael F. Schulze (“plaintiff”) proceeds pro se, is a federal prisoner, and on August

12, 2005, filed his first amended complaint to allege that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug

Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice and United States Marshals Service violated the

Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 552 and 552a. Since plaintiff has paid

the full filing fee to initiate this action and does not proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff bears

responsibility to serve the summons and first amended complaint on defendants. This Court is not in

a position to provide plaintiff the service addresses of the Drug Enforcement Administration and United

States Marshals Service or to serve the summons and amended complaint for plaintiff, pursuant to

plaintiff’s request in his September 20, 2005 papers. 

On the basis of good cause, this Court:

 1. DENIES plaintiff’s request that this Court provide service addresses for or to serve the

summons and amended complaint on the Drug Enforcement Administration and United

Case 1:05-cv-00180-AWI-EPG Document 18 Filed 09/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

States Marshals Service;

2. ORDERS plaintiff, no later than October 17, 2005, to complete service of the summons

and amended complaint on all defendants and in compliance with F.R.Civ.P. 4( i ) and

to file with this Court proofs of such service; and 

3. ADMONISHES plaintiff that his Court will recommend to dismiss this action as to any

defendant on whom plaintiff fails to timely serve the summons and amended complaint

and in compliance with F.R.Civ.P. 4(i). See F.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 22, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00180-AWI-EPG Document 18 Filed 09/23/05 Page 2 of 2