Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00626/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00626-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHANBUNTHAIT PROEUNG,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-02-0626 GEB JFM P

vs.

GEORGE M. GALAZA, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

On February 16, 2006, petitioner filed a notice of change of address. That

document was not served on respondents. Petitioner is advised that every document submitted to

the court for consideration must be served on respondents. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5; Rule 11, 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254. As a prisoner proceeding pro se, petitioner is required to serve all documents in this

action conventionally in accordance with the relevant provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. See Local

Rule 5-135(b). Since an attorney has filed a document with the court on behalf of respondents,

documents submitted by petitioner must be served on that attorney and not on the respondents. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(1). Conventional service is usually accomplished by mailing a copy of the

document to the attorney’s address of record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(B). Petitioner must

include with every document filed in this action a certificate stating the date an accurate copy of

/////

Case 2:02-cv-00626-GEB -JFM Document 32 Filed 03/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

the document was mailed to respondents’ attorney and the address to which it was mailed. See

Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s February 16, 2006

notice of change of address has been noted in the court record. However, petitioner is cautioned

that failure to properly serve any documents subsequently filed in this action, and failure to

include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

DATED: March 6, 2006. 

/mp;001; proe0626.35ch

Case 2:02-cv-00626-GEB -JFM Document 32 Filed 03/08/06 Page 2 of 2