Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00749/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00749-42/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Anthony Craig Huckabee (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on 

April 28, 2009. 

On May 26, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff’s 

motion for a stay of his possible transfer from Valley State Prison pending resolution of this action be 

denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any 

objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 172.) More than fourteen days have 

passed and no objections have been filed. 

ANTHONY CRAIG HUCKABEE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

MEDICAL STAFF at CSATF, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:09-cv-00749-LJO-BAM (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR STAY OF 

TRANSFER DUE TO PENDING CASE

(ECF Nos. 171, 172)

Case 1:09-cv-00749-DAD-BAM Document 179 Filed 06/22/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and 

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on May 26, 2015, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a stay of his possible transfer from Valley State Prison pending 

resolution of this action is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 22, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3.

Case 1:09-cv-00749-DAD-BAM Document 179 Filed 06/22/15 Page 2 of 2