Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01452/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01452-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

Business & Technology Law Group CASE NO. 05 01452 MHP

160 W. Santa Clara Street, Suite 1050 STIP. ENLARGING TIME TO 

San Jose, CA 95113 RESPOND TO AMD. CMPLT. 

Page 1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STEPHEN N. HOLLMAN, ESQ., STATE BAR NO. 55219 

BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP 

160 W. Santa Clara Street, Suite 1050 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Telephone: (408) 282-1949 

Facsimile: (408) 275-9930 

Attorneys for Defendant, Counterclaimant, 

and Third Party Plaintiff, 

MORRISON SOFTDESIGN, INC., and 

Defendant, JOHN MORRISON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

INSIDER SOFTWARE INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MORRISON SOFTDESIGN INC., a 

North Carolina corporation, and JOHN 

MORRISON, an individual, 

 Defendants. 

MORRISON SOFTDESIGN INC., a 

North Carolina corporation, 

 Counterclaimant, 

vs. 

INSIDER SOFTWARE INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Counterdefendant. 

MORRISON SOFTDESIGN INC., a 

North Carolina corporation, 

 Third Party Plaintiff, 

vs. 

INSIDER SOFTWARE INC., a 

Pennsylvania corporation, and RIO 

SABADICCI, an individual, 

 Third Party Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. C 05 01452 MHP 

STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Local Rule 6-1(a) 

[Electronic digital signatures permitted] 

Case 3:05-cv-01452-MHP Document 53 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 2
Business & Technology Law Group CASE NO. 05 01452 MHP

160 W. Santa Clara Street, Suite 1050 STIP. ENLARGING TIME TO 

San Jose, CA 95113 RESPOND TO AMD. CMPLT. 

Page 2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the 

parties, acting through their undersigned counsel, that defendants shall have an enlargement of 

time until 5 p.m. Friday, January 20, 2006, in which to Answer plaintiff’s Amended Complaint 

in the above-captioned matter. This Stipulation does not alter the date of any hearing or 

conference set by the Court. 

DATED: January 18, 2006 

By: /digitally signed/ George Frost 

George Frost, Esq. 

Attorneys for plaintiff 

DATED: January 18, 2006 BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP 

By: /digitally signed/ Stephen N. Hollman 

Stephen N. Hollman, Esq. 

Attorneys for defendants 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: January __, 2006 ______________________________________ 

Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel 

United States District Court Judge 

20

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:05-cv-01452-MHP Document 53 Filed 01/20/06 Page 2 of 2