Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_94-cv-01665/USCOURTS-caed-2_94-cv-01665-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 The application indicates only that counsel for respondent 1

contacted petitioner’s attorney and left a message regarding the

intention to seek additional time. A member of the court’s staff

therefore communicated with counsel for petitioner by telephone

regarding the petitioner’s position on the application.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO ESPINOZA, No. CIV.S-94-1665 LKK DAD DP

Petitioner,

v. ORDER

S.W. ORNOSKI, Warden

of the California State 

Prison at San Quentin,

DEATH PENALTY CASE

Respondent.

 /

Having considered respondent’s second application for

extension of time to file an answer, and in light of counsel for

petitioner’s desire to have a reasonable amount of time to review the

answer prior to the next status conference in this matter, IT IS 1

HEREBY ORDERED that:

Case 2:94-cv-01665-KJM-SCR Document 222 Filed 06/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. Respondent’s second application for extension of time

is granted in part;

2. Respondent’s answer shall be filed and served on or

before June 14, 2006;

3. The next status conference remains set for June 16,

2006, at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom 27; and

4. The parties are advised that at the conclusion of the

status conference respondent’s counsel will be excused and the

conference will continue ex parte with counsel for petitioner present

to further discuss budgeting matters.

DATED: June 8, 2006.

DAD:th

capital\espinoza1665.order.eot2

Case 2:94-cv-01665-KJM-SCR Document 222 Filed 06/09/06 Page 2 of 2