Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04512/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04512-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING CMC

Sharon R. Vinick (SBN 129914)

Darci E. Burrell (SBN 180467)

LEVY VINICK BURRELL HYAMS LLP

180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1300

Oakland, California 94612

Direct: 510-318-7702

Main: 510-318-7700

Fax: 510-318-7701

sharon@levyvinick.com

Linda D. Friedman (pro hac vice forthcoming)

Suzanne E. Bish (pro hac vice forthcoming)

Jennifer S. Gilbert (admitted pro hac vice)

STOWELL & FRIEDMAN, LTD.

303 W. Madison St., Suite 2600

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Phone: 312-431-0888

Fax: 312-431-0228

Lfriedman@sfltd.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

[additional counsel listed on next page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

KATHY FRAZIER, on behalf of herself 

and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, 

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY 

LLC, AND MORGAN STANLEY,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

[CIVIL L.R. 6-1, 6-2]

Case 4:15-cv-04512-PJH Document 29 Filed 12/30/15 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING CMC

DARYL S. LANDY (State Bar No. 136288)

dlandy@morganlewis.com

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

600 Anton Blvd., Suite 1800

Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7653

Tel: 714.830.0600

Fax: 714.830.0700

MARK S. DICHTER, admitted Pro Hac Vice

mdichter@morganlewis.com

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

1701 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Tel: 215.963.5000

Fax: 215.963.5001

BLAIR ROBINSON, pro hac vice pending (in Case No. 3:15-cv-04512)

blair.robinson@morganlewis.com

ANDREW SCHAFFRAN, pro hac vice pending (in Case No. 3:15-cv-04512)

aschaffran@morganlewis.com

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

101 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10178

Tel: 212.309.6000

Fax: 212.309.6001

Attorneys for Defendants

Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, 

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, and

Morgan Stanley

Case 4:15-cv-04512-PJH Document 29 Filed 12/30/15 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING CMC

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Kathy Frazier (“Plaintiff”) and 

Defendants Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, and Morgan 

Stanley (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of 

record, stipulate to continue the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 7, 

2016, to a date that is mutually convenient for the Court after Defendants’ have responded to the 

Second Amended Complaint. 

WHEREAS, on October 16, 2015, the Court set the Case Management Conference for 

January 7, 2016 (Dkt. No. 8);

WHEREAS pursuant the Parties’ concurrently-filed stipulation, Defendants have 

consented to Plaintiff filing a Second Amended Complaint for the limited purpose of adding 

claims for relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;

WHEREAS the Parties have stipulated that Defendants will have sixty (60) days after 

filing to respond to the Second Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS the Parties believe that it would be beneficial to postpone the initial Case 

Management Conference until after Defendants have responded to the Second Amended 

Complaint

WHEREAS Plaintiff believes it would be particularly beneficial to postpone the initial 

Case Management Conference in light of the pending motion to transfer to avoid burden to the 

Court in the event it is granted; 

THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED by the Parties and respectfully requested that the 

Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 7, 2016, be continued to a date 

that is convenient for the Court after Defendants have responded to the Second Amended 

Complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9 and this Court’s Standing Orders, the Parties 

will submit a joint case management conference statement seven (7) court days prior to the 

newly-scheduled conference.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 4:15-cv-04512-PJH Document 29 Filed 12/30/15 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING CMC

Dated: December 21, 2015 LEVY VINICK BURRELL HYAMS LLP

By: /s/ Sharon Vinick

Sharon R. Vinick

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: December 21, 2015 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

By: /s/ Daryl S. Landy

Daryl S. Landy

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 4:15-cv-04512-PJH Document 29 Filed 12/30/15 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING CMC

ATTESTATION RE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES

I, Sharon R. Vinick, attest pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) that all other 

signatories to this document, on whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s 

content and have authorized this filing. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the 

United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: December 21, 2015 LEVY VINICK BURRELL HYAMS LLP

BY: /s/ Sharon R. Vinick

Sharon R. Vinick

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 4:15-cv-04512-PJH Document 29 Filed 12/30/15 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04512-PJH

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING CMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the Order setting the Case Management Conference for 

January 7, 2016 is hereby vacated. The Court will set a new Case Management Conference for a 

date after Defendants have responded to the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Judge

December 30, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:15-cv-04512-PJH Document 29 Filed 12/30/15 Page 6 of 6