Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_13-cv-01052/USCOURTS-azd-4_13-cv-01052-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to

portions of the Report and Recommendation. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739

(7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Richard Shupe, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Cricket Communications, Inc. 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 13-1052-TUC-JAS (EJM)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge

Eric J. Markovich. In his Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Markovich

recommends granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss. As the Court finds that the Report and

Recommendation correctly resolved the motion to dismiss, Plaintiff’s objections are denied.1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Markovich’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 39) is accepted and

adopted.

(2) The motion to dismiss (Doc. 29) is granted and this case is dismissed with prejudice.

(3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment.

(3) This case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Markovich to address any post-judgment

Case 4:13-cv-01052-JAS-EJM Document 42 Filed 12/10/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

motions such as Defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees.

DATED this 10th day of December, 2014.

Case 4:13-cv-01052-JAS-EJM Document 42 Filed 12/10/14 Page 2 of 2