Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03172/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03172-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DERRICK ANDERSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-3172 MCE KJM PS

vs.

ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

Calendared for hearing on January 13, 2010 are defendants’ motions to dismiss. No opposition

to the motions has been filed. 

Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o

party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition

to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 230(i) provides

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.”

1

Case 2:09-cv-03172-MCE -KJM Document 32 Filed 01/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of January 13, 2010 is vacated. Hearing on defendants’

motions is continued to February 17, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motions no later than February 3,

2010. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of nonopposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: January 5, 2010. 

006

anderson.nop

2

Case 2:09-cv-03172-MCE -KJM Document 32 Filed 01/06/10 Page 2 of 2