Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07341/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07341-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 DAN SIEGEL, SBN 56400 

EMILYROSE JOHNS, SBN 294319 

2 MICAH CLATTERBAUGH, SBN 316808 

3 SIEGEL, YEE, BRUNNER & MEHTA 

47514th Street, Suite 500 

4 Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 839-1200 

5 Facsimile: (510) 444-6698 

6 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

7 ZIAD EID and F ALASTEEN 

EID 

8 

9 

10 

11 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

12 

13 

14 

15 

ZIAD EID and F ALASTEEN EID, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

16 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN ) 

FRANCISCO; BILL SCOTT, CHIEF OF ) 

17 THE SAN FRANCISCO POLICE ) 

18 DEPARTMENT; SAN FRANCISCO ) 

POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS DOE ) 

19 1 through DOE 10, ) 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

) 

Defendants. ) -------------~ 

Case No. 3:18-cv-07341-TSH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

Hon. Thomas S. Hixson 

Case Filed: December 5, 2018 

Trial: September 8, 2020 

Eid v. City and County of San Francisco, No. 3:18-cv-07341-TSH 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Dismissal - 1 

Case 3:18-cv-07341-TSH Document 38 Filed 01/10/20 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

On January 6, 2020, the parties agreed to resolve this matter through a dismissal 

with prejudice and a waiver of costs. The parties therefore stipulate that the court 

should dismiss this matter with prejudice, and order that the parties will bear their own 

attorneys' fees and costs. 

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 8, 2020 

Dated: January 8, 2020 

SIEGEL, YEE, BRUNNER & MEHTA 

By: /s/EmilyRose Johns 

EmilyRose Johns 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ZIAD EID and F ALASTEEN EID 

DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

MEREDITH B. OSBORN 

Chief Trial Deputy 

MARGARET W. BAUMGARTNER 

Deputy City Attorney 

By: ls/Margaret W. Baumgartner 

Margaret W. Baumgartner 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, KEVIN ENDO, TESS 

CASEY AND BILL SCOTT 

Eid v. City and County of San Francisco, No. 3:18-cv-07341-TSH 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Dismissal - 2 

Case 3:18-cv-07341-TSH Document 38 Filed 01/10/20 Page 2 of 3
1 PROPOSED ORDER 

2 Based on the parties' stipulation, the court hereby ORDERS that this matter be 

3 dismissed with prejudice, and that each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. 

4 

5 SO ORDERED. 

6 

7 Dated: 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Judge, United States District Court 

Eid v. City and County of San Francisco, No. 3:18-cv-07341-TSH 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Dismissal - 3 

1/10/2020

THOMAS S. HIXSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:18-cv-07341-TSH Document 38 Filed 01/10/20 Page 3 of 3