Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-02270/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-02270-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

TIMOTHY LOCKWOOD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:10-CV-02270-LJO-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(DOC. 14)

ORDER DISREGARDING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION (DOC. 19)

Plaintiff LarryWilliam Cortinas (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 7, 2011, Plaintiff filed his first

amended complaint. Doc. 11. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 10, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which

was served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and

Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Doc. 14. Plaintiff filed an Objection to the

Findings and Recommendations on December 8, 2011. Doc. 18.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

 On December 9, 2011, Plaintiff filed a 1 motion for reconsideration of the Findings and

Recommendations. Doc. 19. The motion repeats Plaintiff’s objections. Plaintiff’s motion is

HEREBY ORDERED disregarded.

1

Case 1:10-cv-02270-LJO-DLB Document 21 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 10, 2011, is adopted in full;

2. This action proceed against Defendant Mora on the Eighth Amendment deliberate

indifference claim and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

discrimination on the basis of religion claim; and

3. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Lockwood, Kernan, Yates, Nash, Walker,

Herrera, J. Walker, W. Myers, Phillips, Artis, Foston, Catlett, Mardian, Rohrdanz,

Brown, Dudarewicz, Duenas and Igbinosa are DISMISSED from this action for

failure to state a claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-02270-LJO-DLB Document 21 Filed 01/06/12 Page 2 of 2