Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01468/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01468-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation, )

) 2:05-cv-1468-GEB-JFM

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

NIKEPAL INTERNATIONAL, INC., a )

California corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

)

On February 20, 2007, Nike, Inc. (“Nike”) filed an ex parte

application in which it seeks leave to brief an issue it asserts was

raised sua sponte during the February 5, 2007 hearing on the parties’

cross-motions for summary judgment. Specifically, Nike argues that

“the Court raised a hypothetical question regarding whether issues

relating to the appeal of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board []

decision would be for the jury if the matter were to proceed to

trial.” (Pl.’s Ex Parte Application at 1:25-27.) This issue need not

be briefed at this time; therefore, Nike’s request is denied. 

Dated: February 21, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01468-GEB -JFM Document 122 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 1