Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01063/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01063-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR 

IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, AND RELATED OPPOSITION AND REPLY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

File No. 11005-003 

STEVEN E. MOYER, ESQ. (SBN 047326) 

PATRICK A. FRAIOLI, ESQ. (SBN 191824) 

ROWENA SANTOS (SBN 210185) 

MOLDO DAVIDSON FRAIOLI 

SEROR & SESTANOVICH LLP 

2029 Century Park East, 21st Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Tel: (310) 551-3100 

Fax: (310) 551-0238 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Womack 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

ROBERT WOMACK, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

COUNTY OF AMADOR et al. 

 Defendants 

CASE NO.: CIV S 02-1063 RRB 

DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE THE HEARING OF 

DEFENDANT COUNTY OF 

AMADOR’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN 

THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY 

ADJUDICATION, AND RELATED 

DEADLINES FOR FILING THE 

OPPOSITION AND REPLY 

[No Hearing Necessary] 

Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, Judge 

U.S. District Court 

501 “I” Street 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST AND THEIR ATTORNEYS 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01063-JAM -DAD Document 75 Filed 08/23/07 Page 1 of 4
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR 

IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, AND RELATED OPPOSITION AND REPLY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this Stipulation continuing the hearing of 

defendant County of Amador’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, 

Summary Adjudication (“Motion for Summary Judgment”), and Related Deadline for 

Filing the Opposition and Reply (“Stipulation”) is made by and between plaintiff 

Robert Womack “Womack” or “Plaintiff”) and the defendant County of Amador 

(“Defendant”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of 

record. 

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant’s pending Motion for Summary 

Judgment is set for September 19, 2007, and Plaintiff’s opposition is due on or before 

September 5, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel will be unavailable from August 27, 2007 to 

September 7, 2007 for scheduled vacations; 

WHEREAS, the Parties agreed that a continuance of the September 19, 2007, 

hearing date for the Motions for Summary Judgment is necessary in order to allow 

sufficient time for briefing; 

WHEREAS, the Courtroom Deputy Clerk informed the Plaintiff’s counsel that 

the first available date for continuance of the hearing for Defendant’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment were October 3, 2007 or October 17, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Defendant’s counsel represented that they will be unavailable on 

October 3, 2007 or October 17, 2007 and requested the next available date on the 

Court’s calendar; and 

WHEREAS, the Courtroom Deputy Clerk has informed the parties that the 

next available date for hearing of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is 

November 7, 2007; 

/// 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01063-JAM -DAD Document 75 Filed 08/23/07 Page 2 of 4
3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR 

IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, AND RELATED OPPOSITION AND REPLY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the 

parties as follows: 

1. Defendant’s pending Motions for Summary Judgment shall be set for 

hearing on November 7, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. All filing deadlines calculated by 

reference to the hearing date shall be calculated based on this date. 

2. Plaintiff’s counsel shall file this stipulation with the Court electronically, 

in accordance with local rules. The signatories below will transmit facsimile or e-mail 

copies of their handwritten signatures to Plaintiff’s counsel. Plaintiff’s counsel will 

indicate the agreement and signatures of all counsel on the document filed with the 

Court according to local rules regarding electronic filing of signatures. 

Dated: August 22, 2007 MOLDO DAVIDSON FRAIOLI 

 SEROR & SESTANOVICH LLP 

By: ____________________________ 

Steven E. Moyer, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Wok 

Dated: August 22, 2007 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF 

By: ____________________________ 

Laurence A. Angelo, Esq. 

Attorneys for Defendant County of 

Amador, a subdivision of the State 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01063-JAM -DAD Document 75 Filed 08/23/07 Page 3 of 4
4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR 

IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, AND RELATED OPPOSITION AND REPLY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

1. Defendant County of Amador’s (“Defendant”) Motions for Summary Judgment 

shall be set for hearing on November 7, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. 

2. Plaintiff Robert Womack’s (“Plaintiff”) Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment must filed and served pursuant to Local Rule 78-230; 

3. Defendant’s Repy to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment must filed and served pursuant to Local Rule 78-230. 

Dated: August 22, 2007 /s/ Ralph R. Beistline_________

Hon. Ralph R. Beistline 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01063-JAM -DAD Document 75 Filed 08/23/07 Page 4 of 4