Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02116/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02116-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Petitioner is advised that a response to a traverse is not an authorized pleading and that 1

respondents have not been ordered to file a response to his traverse.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRY MONTGOMERY,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2116 FCD DAD P

vs.

W.A. DUNCAN, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has filed a motion requesting a response to his traverse and an inquiry

regarding the status of his case. Court records indicate that the respondents filed an answer on

April 24, 2006 and that petitioner filed his traverse on May 8, 2006. The case is now submitted 1

and in due course, the court will issue its findings and recommendations. Petitioner is informed

that because of the court’s caseload, a response to inquiries about the status of his case cannot

always be provided. As long as the petitioner keeps the court informed of any change of address,

no further action is necessary.

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02116-FCD-DAD Document 29 Filed 04/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s March 30, 2007 motion shall be placed in the file;

2. Petitioner’s motion for a response to his traverse is denied; and 

3. Petitioner’s motion for a case status report is granted.

DATED: April 16, 2007.

DAD:4

mont2116.stat

Case 2:04-cv-02116-FCD-DAD Document 29 Filed 04/17/07 Page 2 of 2