Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04333/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04333-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. C 06-4333 PJH

v. ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO MODIFY BRIEFING

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, SCHEDULE

et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

Before the court is the AG plaintiffs’ administrative motion to modify the briefing

schedule with respect to defendants’ motion to dismiss, currently set for hearing on

February 7, 2007. The AG plaintiffs, having received the court’s November 28, 2006 order

limiting any opposition brief to no more than 60 pages, now seek to modify the briefing

schedule so that both parties will receive an extension of time in which to file both

opposition and reply briefs to the motion. Defendants have filed a statement of nonopposition to the AG plaintiffs’ request.

The court hereby GRANTS the AG plaintiffs’ request. The AG plaintiffs’ opposition

brief shall now be due by December 13, 2006, and defendants’ reply shall be due no later

than January 10, 2007. The hearing date on the motion to dismiss remains intact. The

court cautions the parties, however, that in view of the court’s January calendar – including

the hearing set for the DRAM direct purchaser summary judgment motions – and the

adjustments that will have to be made to accommodate plaintiffs’ proposed briefing

schedule, the court can only undertake its best efforts to ensure that the hearing schedule

for defendants’ motion to dismiss remains intact. 

/ / / 

Case 4:06-cv-04333-PJH Document 31 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 29, 2006 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-04333-PJH Document 31 Filed 11/29/06 Page 2 of 2