Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_16-cv-02184/USCOURTS-casd-3_16-cv-02184-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983pr Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

FILED 

[--~AR-~~~~;-1 - __J CLER!<, <.JS DIC::TFJICT CO SOUTHFi.:iNriic::-Tp'-'~C'! 0·,. , U.RT BY - '. ' ' . ORN/A 

---------· -· ---- _l?!.;'.'.:_!;JTY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

11 CHRISTOPHER M. MENDOZA, Case No.: 16cv2184-WQH-BGS 

12 Plaintiff, ORDER 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

v. 

J. DOE, Ofc/Deputy Classification; 

MULTIPLE J. JOBS, 

Ofc/Deputies/Supervisors; 

DEPUTY MCGUIRE, 

DeputySheriff/Detention Unit; 

DEPUTY ANCHO, Deputy 

Sheriff/Detention Unit, 

Defendants. 

20 HA YES, Judge: 

21 The matters before the Court is the Report and Recommendation issued by the 

22 Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 153) recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to 

23 prosecute, that the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Ancho (ECF No. 34) 

24 be granted, that the motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff (ECF No. 47) be 

25 denied, and that the motion to amend filed by Plaintiff (ECF No. 89) be denied. 

26 The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation of a 

27 magistrate judge are set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 

28 636(b ). The district judge must "make a de novo determination of those portions of the 

!6cv2184-WQH-BGS 

Case 3:16-cv-02184-WQH-BGS Document 155 Filed 03/07/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
1 report ... to which objection is made," and "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in 

2 part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The 

3 district court need not review de novo those portions of a Report and Recommendation to 

4 which neither party objects. See Wang v. Masaitis, 416 F.3d 992, 1000 n.13 (9th Cir. 

5 2005); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane) 

6 ("Neither the Constitution nor the [Federal Magistrates Act] requires a district judge to 

7 review, de novo, findings and recommendations that the parties themselves accept as 

8 correct."). 

9 No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has 

10 reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record, and the submissions of the parties. 

11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 153) is 

12 adopted in its entirety. 

13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment filed by 

14 Defendant Ancho (ECF No. 34) is GRANTED. The motions for summary judgment filed 

15 by Plaintiff(ECF Nos. 47, 114) are DENIED. The motion to amend filed by Plaintiff(ECF 

16 No. 89) is DENIED. The motion requesting a bench trial filed by Plaintiff (ECF No. 109) 

17 is DENIED. The motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution filed by Defendant Ancho (ECF 

18 No. 151) is GRANTED. The Clerk is ordered to enter judgment in favor of all defendants 

19 and against Plaintiff, and to close the case. 

20 

21 DATED: J./7/f9 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

16cv2184-WQH-BGS 

Case 3:16-cv-02184-WQH-BGS Document 155 Filed 03/07/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2