Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01535/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01535-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODERICK WASHINGTON, 1:05-CV-01535-OWW-TAG-HC

Petitioner,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

vs. RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 22)

 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR

J. WOODFORD, WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 17)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

Respondent. TO ENTER JUDGMENT

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On July 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed because

Petitioner had failed to comply with the Court’s order regarding submission of a new in forma

pauperis application or payment of the filing fee. (Doc.22). This Report and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty days from

the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Report

and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Case 1:05-cv-01535-OWW -TAG Document 23 Filed 12/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed July 19, 2006 (Doc. 22), is ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 17), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 30, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01535-OWW -TAG Document 23 Filed 12/01/06 Page 2 of 2