Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00025/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00025-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

COOLEY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1. 

STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR 

OTHERWISE RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPL. 

 CV-15-0025-JCS 

COOLEY LLP 

HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960) 

(hkeefe@cooley.com) 

LAM K. NGUYEN (265285) 

(lnguyen@cooley.com) 

3175 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130 

Telephone: (650) 843-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 849-7400 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TRINET GROUP INC. 

DR. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM

(laks22002@yahoo.com) 

222 Stanford Avenue 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 690-0995 

Facsimile: (650) 854-3393 

Pro Se Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DR. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TRINET GROUP INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. CV-15-0025-JCS 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE

RESPOND TO AMENDED

COMPLAINT 

 

Case 3:15-cv-00025-EDL Document 23 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 3
COOLEY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2. 

STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR 

OTHERWISE RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPL. 

CV-15-0025-JCS 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), Plaintiff Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam and Defendant TriNet 

Group Inc. hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time fro TriNet Group Inc. to answer or 

otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 10) from March 3, 2015 up to and 

including April 17, 2015. 

This extension will not alter the date of any other event or any deadline already fixed by 

Court order. 

Dated: February 27, 2015 COOLEY LLP 

By: /s/ Heidi L. Keefe Heidi L. Keefe 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TriNet Group Inc. 

Dated: February 27, 2015 DR. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM 

By: /s/ Lakshmi Arunachalam 

Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam 

Pro Se Plaintiff 

 

Dated: 3/2/15 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:15-cv-00025-EDL Document 23 Filed 03/02/15 Page 2 of 3
COOLEY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3. 

STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR 

OTHERWISE RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPL. 

CV-15-0025-JCS 

FILER’S ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)(3) 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned hereby attests that concurrence in 

the filing of the “Stipulation To Extend Time To Answer Or Otherwise Respond To Amended 

Complaint” has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 

Executed this 27th day of February, 2015 at Palo Alto, California 

By: /s/ Heidi L. Keefe 

 Heidi L. Keefe 

Case 3:15-cv-00025-EDL Document 23 Filed 03/02/15 Page 3 of 3