Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01530/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01530-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendant’s First EOT to Respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

ROBERT R. ANDERSON

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

MONICA N. ANDERSON

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

DANIEL P. O’DONNELL, State Bar No. 177872

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 324-5810

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Herrera, Grannis, Fisher,

Providence, Allen, Schwartz, O’Ran, Lee, Thumser,

Bradanick and California Medical Facility

SA2005100247

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 SACRAMENTO DIVISION

GUY T. STRINGHAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. LEE, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CIV S-04-1530 DFL GGH P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

Defendant’s first request for an extension of time to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s

Motion for Preliminary Injunction was considered by this Court and, good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, from the date this order is served, Defendant has 20

days to file his response to Plaintiff’s motion. No further extensions

DATED: 6/24/05 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

___________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

stri1530.eot06

Case 2:04-cv-01530-JAM-GGH Document 28 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 1