Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01839/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01839-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROP.] ORDER GRANTING SYNAPTICS’ MAR TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

CASE NO. C 06-01839 CRB

pa-1235941

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ELANTECH DEVICES CORPORATION, a 

corporation existing under the laws of Taiwan, 

R.O.C.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SYNAPTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation; 

AVERATEC, INC., a California corporation; 

and PROSTAR COMPUTER, INC., a 

California corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-01839 CRB

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

GRANTING SYNAPTICS, INC.’S

MISCELLANEOUS 

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST 

TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER 

SEAL

Date: March 7, 2008

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Courtroom 8, 19th Floor

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 5:06-cv-01839-PVT Document 258 Filed 02/26/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROP.] ORDER GRANTING SYNAPTICS’ MAR TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

CASE NO. C 06-01839 CRB

pa-1235941

1

This matter comes before the Court on an administrative motion to file under seal: 

(1) Synaptics, Inc.’s Consolidated Reply Brief in Support of Motions for Partial 

Summary Judgment that Use of Elantech’s Product Features Meet the 

Limitations of Synaptics’ Patent Claims;

(2) Supplemental Declaration of Andrew Wolfe Ph.D. in Support of Synaptics, 

Inc.’s Motions for Summary Judgment, executed February 20, 2008 (“Supp. 

Wolfe SJ Infringement Declaration”); and

(3) Appendix A to the Supp. Wolfe SJ Infringement Declaration

Having considered Synaptics’ request, as well as the pleadings and materials lodged and 

filed in this matter, the Court finds that there is GOOD CAUSE APPEARING for Synaptics, 

Inc.’s Consolidated Reply Brief in Support of Motions for Partial Summary Judgment that Use 

of Elantech’s Product Features Meet the Limitations of Synaptics’ Patent Claims, the Supp. 

Wolfe SJ Infringement Declaration, and Appendix A thereto, to be filed under seal. Defendant’s 

administrative motion to file documents under seal is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________

By: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

February 26, 2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 5:06-cv-01839-PVT Document 258 Filed 02/26/08 Page 2 of 2