Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01134/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01134-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DORIS ANDERSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:21-cv-01134-ADA-SAB

ORDER ENTERING STIPULATION 

CLARIFYING PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEEMING 

COMPLAINT AMENDED IN ACCORD WITH 

TERMS OF STIPULATION

(ECF Nos. 85, 86) 

Following the adoption of findings and recommendations on Defendants’ motion to 

dismiss, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint on September 7, 2023. (ECF No. 85.) On 

September 26, 2023, the parties filed a stipulated request to clarify the second amended 

complaint. (ECF No. 86.) 

First, two Defendants have the last name “Sanchez.” In paragraphs 31, 33, 40, and 42 of 

the second amended complaint, Plaintiffs refer to “Sanchez” or “Officer Sanchez” without 

specifying the first name of the referenced person. The Parties stipulate that: (a) in paragraphs 

31 and 33, “Sanchez” and “Officer Sanchez” refer to Officer Jonathan Sanchez; and (b) in 

paragraphs 40 and 42, “Sanchez” and “Officer Sanchez” refer to Officer Anthony Sanchez. 

Second, the parties stipulate that Plaintiffs do not seek punitive or treble damages from 

Defendant County of Fresno. The Court finds good cause to enter the parties’ stipulation. 

/ / /

Case 1:21-cv-01134-KES-SAB Document 87 Filed 09/26/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the 

Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint filed September 7, 2023, (ECF No. 85), is DEEMED 

AMENDED as follows: 

1. In paragraphs 31 and 33, “Sanchez” and “Officer Sanchez” refer to Officer 

Jonathan Sanchez;

2. In paragraphs 40 and 42, “Sanchez” and “Officer Sanchez” refer to Officer 

Anthony Sanchez; and

3. Plaintiffs do not seek punitive or treble damages from Defendant County of 

Fresno. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2023 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:21-cv-01134-KES-SAB Document 87 Filed 09/26/23 Page 2 of 2