Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01227/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01227-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Contitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID ANTHONY FALLON,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-06-1227 FCD GGH PS

vs.

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

Defendant. ORDER

__________________________________/

On September 29, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-01227-FCD-GGH Document 5 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed September 29, 2006, are

ADOPTED; 

2. Plaintiff is declared a vexatious litigant.

3. The following pre-filing review order is entered: (1) Plaintiff shall not initiate

any further pro se action in this court unless the pleadings initiating the action are accompanied

by a declaration under penalty of perjury that explains why plaintiff believes he has meritorious

claims. The declaration shall also state that the claims are not frivolous or made in bad faith, and

that plaintiff has conducted a reasonable investigation of the facts and the investigation supports

his claim(s). (2) The Clerk shall not file or lodge any action submitted pro se by plaintiff unless

it is accompanied by the required declaration; any such incomplete filings shall be returned to

plaintiff without further action of the court. (3) If plaintiff files a pro se action accompanied by

the required declaration, the Clerk shall open the matter as a miscellaneous case to be considered

by the General Duty Judge of this court. The judge will issue necessary orders after making a

determination whether the case should be filed under the appropriate standards and pertinent

law; and

4. This action is dismissed with prejudice.

DATED: November 15, 2006

Case 2:06-cv-01227-FCD-GGH Document 5 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 2