Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453-74/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MARC OPPERMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PATH, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING CASE 

SCHEDULING

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO CASES:

Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST

Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST

Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST

Espitita v. Hipter, Inc., No. 4:13-cv-432-JST

(collectively, the “Related Actions”)

The undersigned parties hereby stipulate to the following with respect to the schedule for 

considering Twitter’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 725), and respectfully request 

that the Court issue the requested scheduling order.

The parties stipulate that hearing on the Motion, currently scheduled for September 22, 

2016, may be vacated, and request that the Court issue an order vacating the hearing.

The parties further stipulate that the revised scheduling order required by the Stipulation 

and Order Regarding Case Scheduling (ECF No. 829) entered on September 12, 2016, will 

contain proposals for hearing dates to resolve Twitter’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 842 Filed 09/20/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 

The parties further request that the Court not rule on Plaintiffs’ pending Objections to 

Evidence, (ECF No. 836) until after the revised scheduling order is entered by this Court. The 

parties further agree that Twitter shall have the right to file a response to the Objections prior to 

any Court ruling. 

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: September 16, 2016 By: /s/ James G. Snell

James G. Snell

PERKINS COIE LLP

3150 Porter Dr.

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212

Tel: 650.838.4300

Fax: 650.838.4350

jsnell@perkinscoie.com

Attorneys for Defendant Twitter, Inc.

DATED: September 16, 2016 By: /s/ Michael von Loewenfeldt

Michael von Loewenfeldt 

James M. Wagstaffe

Frank Busch

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 

101 Mission Street, 18th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

Tel.: 415-371-8500

Fax: 415-371-0500

wagstagge@kerrwagstaffe.com

mvl@kerrwagstaffe.com

busch@kerrwagstaffe.com

David M. Given

Nicholas A. Carlin

PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP

39 Mesa Street, Ste. 201

San Francisco, CA 94129

Tel: 415-398-0900

Fax: 415-398-0911

dmg@phillaw.com

nac@phillaw.com

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

Carl F. Schwenker (admitted pro hac vice)

LAW OFFICES OF CARL F. SCHWENKER

The Haehnel Building

1101 East 11th Street

Austin, TX 78702

Tel: 512-480-8427

Fax: 512-857-1294

cfslaw@swbell.net

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 842 Filed 09/20/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 

Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel

Jeff Edwards (admitted pro hac vice)

EDWARDS LAW

The Haehnel Building

1101 East 11th Street

Austin, TX 78702

Tel: 512-623-7727

Fax: 512-623-7729

cfslaw@swbell.net

Jennifer Sarnelli

GARDY & NOTIS, LLP

501 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1408

New York, NY 10017

Tel: 212-905-0509

Fax: 212-905-0508

jsarnelli@gardylaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant Opperman Plaintiffs

ATTESTATION

I, James G. Snell, do hereby declare pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) that concurrence in 

the filing of the foregoing document has been obtained from Plaintiffs’ counsel on this 16th day 

of September, 2016.

/s/ James G. Snell

James G. Snell

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 842 Filed 09/20/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Stipulation between Plaintiffs and Twitter is GRANTED as follows:

The Court vacates the hearing on Twitter’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 

725), currently scheduled for September 22, 2016.

The Plaintiffs and Twitter will include proposals for hearing dates on Twitter’s Motion in 

the revised scheduling order required by the Stipulation and Order Regarding Case Scheduling 

(ECF No. 829) entered on September 12, 2016. 

The Court will defer ruling on Plaintiffs’ Objections to Evidence (ECF No. 836), until 

after the revised scheduling order is entered and until after Twitter has filed a response to the 

Objections. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _____________, 2016

By:

HON. JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 842 Filed 09/20/16 Page 4 of 4