Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02879/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02879-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY A LUCERO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-2879 CRB

ORDER

Having considered Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendants’ Supplemental Declaration, the

Court affirms its July 14, 2010 Order Conditionally Granting Plaintiff’s Request for Relief

From Judgment. In his First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff alleges several times that

Defendants unlawfully foreclosed on the property at issue in this case. See, e.g., FAC ¶ 75

(“Defendants . . . proceeded with foreclosure in violation of TILA requirements.”); ¶ 77

(“Defendants also violated California Civil Codes governing non-judicial foreclosure.”); ¶ 80

(“As a result of the Defendants’ [unlawful conduct], Plaintiff has suffered damages,

including the loss of his real property to foreclosure.”). Plaintiff’s second cause of action is,

in fact, a claim for Wrongful Foreclosure. FAC at 15. Given these allegations, it is

reasonable for Defendants to postpone the further sale of the property at issue until this case

is resolved. Accordingly, the Court affirms its finding that there is a danger that Defendants

will suffer prejudice if Plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion is granted. The Court’s previous Order is

Case 3:09-cv-02879-CRB Document 46 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2009\2879\Order reaffirming Rule 60 Order.wpd 2

therefore affirmed in all respects.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 22, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02879-CRB Document 46 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 2