Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01964/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01964-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sabina Carol Francois,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Jeh Johnson, et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CV 13-01964-PHX-PGR

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 33) of the Court’s

order denying Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order granting

Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Plaintiff’s motion is not based on a showing of manifest error

or new facts or legal authority. LRCiv. 7.2(g). Instead, it repeats facts and arguments the

Court has already considered, twice. See United States v. Rezzonico, 32 F.Supp.2d 1112,

1116 (D.Ariz. 1998) (motions for reconsideration should not ask the court to “rethink what

the court has already thought through—rightly or wrongly.”). 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 33).

DATED this 20th day of May, 2014.

Case 2:13-cv-01964-PGR Document 34 Filed 05/20/14 Page 1 of 1