Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04871/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04871-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

376977.01 CASE NO. C 03-4871 JW

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 

LEO L. LAM - #181861 

EUGENE M. PAIGE - #202849 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff 

PIXART IMAGING, INC. 

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

MORGAN CHU - #70446 

SAMUEL K. LU - #171969 

ALAN J. HEINRICH - #212782 

RICHARD E. LYON - #229288 

1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276 

Telephone: (310) 277-1010 

Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant 

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE 

LTD and AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES ECBU IP (SINGAPORE) 

PTE LTD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP 

(SINGAPORE) PTE LTD and AVAGO 

TECHNOLOGIES ECBU IP (SINGAPORE) 

PTE LTD, 

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, 

v. 

PIXART IMAGING, INC., a Taiwanese 

corporation, 

 Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

Case No. C 03-4871 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 219 Filed 07/14/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

376977.01 CASE NO. C 03-4871 JW

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants 

Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) PTE Ltd. and Avago Technologies ECBU IP 

(Singapore) PTE Ltd., (collectively, “Avago”) and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff PixArt 

Imaging, Inc. (“PixArt”), through their respective counsel of record, that: 

1. Because the parties have reached a settlement in this action, PixArt hereby 

dismisses its claims and defenses with prejudice and Avago hereby dismisses its counterclaims 

and defenses with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a); and 

2. Each party will bear its own legal expenses, including without limitation, 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Dated: July 14, 2006 IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Samuel K. Lu 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and 

 Counterclaim-Defendants 

 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP 

 (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD and AVAGO 

 TECHNOLOGIES ECBU IP (SINGAPORE) 

 PTE LTD. 

Dated: July 14, 2006 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Eugene M. Paige 

 Attorneys for Defendant and 

 Counterclaim-Plaintiff 

 PIXART IMAGING INC. 

Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 219 Filed 07/14/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

376977.01 CASE NO. C 03-4871 JW

 I hereby attest, pursuant to section X of General Order 45, that concurrence in the filing 

of this document has been obtained from Samuel K. Lu, Esq., Attorney for the Plaintiffs and 

Counterclaim-Defendants. 

Dated: July 14, 2006 By: /s/ Eugene M. Paige__________ 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___7/14/06_________________ 

 HONORABLE JAMES WARE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 219 Filed 07/14/06 Page 3 of 3