Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07067/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07067-106/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP’S PRETRIAL FILINGS 

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

WILLIAM F. ABRAMS (SBN 88805) 

william.abrams@bingham.com 

DAVID S. CANNON (SBN 209501) 

david.cannon@bingham.com 

ERIN A. SMART (SBN 246288) 

erin.smart@bingham.com 

AUDREY LO (SBN 253738) 

audrey.lo@bingham.com 

OLIVIA PARA (SBN 255592) 

olivia.para@bingham.com 

1900 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2223 

Telephone: 650.849.4400 

Facsimile: 650.849.4800 

Attorneys for Defendant 

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MMCA GROUP LTD., 

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY ET AL., 

Defendants.

No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING 

MATERIAL IN HP’S PRETRIAL 

FILINGS

L. R. Civ. P. 79-5 

[No Hearing Required] 

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

; DIRECTIONS TO HP

06-7067

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 883 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP’S PRETRIAL FILINGS 

1

On February 1, 2010, Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) filed an Administrative 

Motion to Seal Material in HP’s Pretrial Filings (“Administrative Motion”) and a supporting 

declaration (“Declaration”) establishing that the designated material is subject to being sealed. 

The Court, having considered the Administrative Motion and Declaration, finds 

the following material in HP’s pretrial filings subject to being sealed: 

1. Portions of HP’s Motion In Limine No. 1 To Exclude Evidence and Argument 

Regarding Allegations of Trade Secret Disclosure Through DMS; [Proposed] 

Order

2. Portions of HP’s Motion In Limine No. 2 to Exclude Evidence and Argument 

Regarding Damages Irrelevant to Remaining Claims and Damages Not 

Calculated by Plaintiff’s Damages Expert; [Proposed] Order

3. Portions of HP’s Motion In Limine No. 3 To Exclude Evidence And 

Argument Regarding Luis Ortega’s Employment Interviews; [Proposed] 

Order

4. Portions of HP’s Motion In Limine No. 4 to Exclude Evidence and Argument 

Regarding Three Ethics Complaints; [Proposed] Order 

5. Portions of HP’s Motion In Limine No. 6 to Exclude Evidence and Argument 

Regarding Irrelevant, Unfairly Prejudicial, and Hearsay Evidence Regarding 

Alleged Relationships, Purported Pretexting, Employment Termination, 

Immigration Status and Alleged “Entrapment Seizures;” [Proposed] Order 

6. Exhibits 1-4 and 6-20 to the Declaration of Erin A. Smart in Support of HP’s 

Motions in Limine and Motion for Reconsideration 

///

///

///

///

///

///

1, 3, 4

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 883 Filed 03/01/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP’S PRETRIAL FILINGS 

2

Therefore, pursuant to Rule 79 of the Local Civil Rules of the Northern District of 

California, the Administrative Motion is GRANTED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

Whenever filed, in whole or in part, with the Court in this case, the material 

referenced above shall be filed under seal. 

DATED: _____________, 2010 By:

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Judge 

HP is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public record, no later than March 8, 2010,

Exhibits 2 and 5 to the Declaration of Erin A. Smart in Support of Hewlett-Packard's Motions

in Limine and Motion for Reconsideration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

March 1

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 883 Filed 03/01/10 Page 3 of 3