Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00605/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00605-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

{00758098.DOC}1 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

Nancy J. Sheehan, SBN 109419 

Colleen Tang, SBN 257661 

350 University Avenue, Suite 200 

Sacramento, California 95825 

(916) 929-1481 

(916) 927-3706 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and SACRAMENTO COUNTY 

SHERIFF JOHN McGINNESS 

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, P.C. 

Joseph J. Wiseman, SBN 107403 

1477 Drew Avenue, Suite 106 

Davis, California 95618 

(530) 759-0700 

(530) 759-0800 (facsimile) 

Attorney for Plaintiff NANETTE DELP 

CHARLES E. BAUER, SBN 124163 

LAW OFFICE OF CHARLES BAUER 

1007 7th Street, Suite 500 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 443-0529 

Attorney for Defendant PAULA WOOD

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NANETTE DELP, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF 

JOHN McGINNESS, PAULA WOOD, 

individually, CLEMENT TANG, 

individually and DOES 1 through 5, 

Defendants.

_____________________________________/ 

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00605-JAM-DAD 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)

Complaint Filed: 03/04/09 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties to this action, by and 

through their undersigned counsel, as follows: 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-00605-JAM-DAD Document 18 Filed 03/25/10 Page 1 of 3
{00758098.DOC}2 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)

The claims for relief asserted against Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and 

SHERIFF JOHN McGINNESS shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to rule 41(a)(1) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each of those parties to bear their own attorney’s fees and 

costs. 

The claims for relief asserted against Defendant PAULA WOOD shall be dismissed without 

prejudice. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: March 24, 2010 PORTER SCOTT 

 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

 By /s/ Nancy J. Sheehan 

 Nancy J. Sheehan 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, and 

 SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF JOHN 

 McGINNESS 

Dated: March 17, 2010 JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, P.C. 

 By /s/ Joseph J. Wiseman (as authorized on 3/17/10) 

 Joseph J. Wiseman 

 Attorney for Plaintiff NANETTE DELP 

Dated: March 23, 2010 LAW OFFICE OF CHARLES BAUER 

 By /s/ Charles E. Bauer (as authorized on 3/23/10)

 Charles E. Bauer 

 Attorney for Defendant PAULA WOOD 

 

ORDER

Good cause appearing, this matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice with respect to 

the claims asserted against Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and SHERIFF JOHN 

MCGINNESS with each side to bear their own attorneys fees and costs, and without prejudice 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-00605-JAM-DAD Document 18 Filed 03/25/10 Page 2 of 3
{00758098.DOC}3 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)

with respect to the claims asserted against Defendant PAULA WOOD. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 24, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ 

 United States District Court Judge 

Eastern District of California 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-00605-JAM-DAD Document 18 Filed 03/25/10 Page 3 of 3