Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-1_04-cv-02402/USCOURTS-alnd-1_04-cv-02402-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

MELISSA M. WELDON,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALABAMA POWER COMPANY,

Defendant.

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

CIVIL ACTION NO.

04-AR-2402-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On June 26, 2006, the court heard oral argument on

defendant’s motion to supplement its initial disclosures by the

addition of two prospective fact witnesses. Although at the

pretrial conference the court did not grant defendant’s request

that it be allowed to supplement its witness list, it did agree

to allow defendant to file its present motion after the pretrial

order had been entered. In the motion, defendant concedes that

if its motion is granted, plaintiff should be allowed to depose

the new witnesses.

Under the circumstances, defendant’s motion is CONDITIONALLY

GRANTED, the conditions being (1) that defendant shall make

available for deposition by plaintiff, without subpoena, Walter

Herman Graham, William Thomas Killian, Glenda Dicks and Wendell

McLain; (2) that the depositions be taken and transcribed at

defendant’s cost; (3) that the depositions be completed by July

28, 2006, and; (4) that plaintiff be allowed to amend her witness

FILED

 2006 Jun-27 PM 12:45

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 1:04-cv-02402-WMA Document 44 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 2
list to include any of the said witnesses after the depositions

have been completed.

The pretrial order is AMENDED accordingly.

DONE this 27 day of June, 2006. th

_____________________________

WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-02402-WMA Document 44 Filed 06/27/06 Page 2 of 2