Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_16-cv-01761/USCOURTS-casd-3_16-cv-01761-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

United States District Court

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Pablo S. Jiminez, 

 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

Cynthia Y. Tampkins, 

 Respondent.

Civil Action No. 16cv1761-MMA(KSC)

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried 

or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

CLERK OF COURT 

JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court

R. Chapman, Deputy

By: s/ R. Chapman

Date: 12/6/18

The Court concludes that Judge Crawford issued an accurate Report and well-reasoned 

recommendation that the petition be denied. The Court overrules Petitioner’s objections and adopts the 

Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The Court denies the petition with prejudice. Rule 11 of 

the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases states that “the district court must issue or deny a 

certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant.” A certificate of 

appealability is not issued unless there is “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

Under this standard, a petitioner must show that reasonable jurists could debate whether the petition 

should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve 

encouragement to proceed further. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation and 

incorporated by reference herein, the Court finds that this standard has not been met and therefore 

declines to issue a certificate of appealability in this case.

Case 3:16-cv-01761-MMA-KSC Document 32 Filed 12/06/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 1