Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02539/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02539-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The date of the removal hearing, previously set for July 18, 2007, will be re-scheduled. 1

1

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS, SCSBN 9990

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143

Assistant United States Attorney

Chief, Civil Division

EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7124

FAX: (415) 436-6927

Attorneys for Petitioner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF )

JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR )

IMMIGRATION REVIEW, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

PHAT THE HUYNH, )

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

No. 07-2539 MMC

[PROPOSED] AMENDED ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE RE: ENFORCEMENT OF

SUBPOENA ISSUED BY A UNITED

STATES IMMIGRATION JUDGE

Good cause having been shown by the petitioner upon its amended petition filed in the aboveentitled matter, it is hereby:

ORDERED that respondent, Phat The Huynh, is ordered to appear before this Court on 

__________, 2007, at ____ a.m./p.m. in Courtroom No. ____, ____ Floor, United States District

Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102, and then and there, show cause,

if any, why he should not be compelled to appear at the removal hearing of Phuong Thi Ly (A45-

997-108), on August 22, 2007, at 2:00 p.m., as directed by the subpoena issued by Immigration

Judge Robert Yeargin, which was served on the respondent on October 28, 2006.1

ORDERED that a certified copy of the Amended Order to Show Cause, together with a copy of

August 17 9:00 7 19th

Case 3:07-cv-02539-MMC Document 18 Filed 07/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the aforesaid amended petition, as well as the petitioner’s amended memorandum in support of

petition and the declaration of Edward A. Olsen, be served upon said respondent in accordance with

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure at least thirty-five (35) days before the return date of

this Amended Order above specified; and it is further

ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days before the return date of this Amended Order,

respondent may file and serve a written response to the amended petition, supported by appropriate

affidavit(s) or declaration(s) in conformance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, as well as any motion they

desire to make, that the petitioner may file and serve a written reply to such response, if any, within

fourteen (14) days before the return date of this Amended Order; that all motions and issues raised

by the pleadings will be considered on the return date of this Amended Order; and only those issues

raised by motion or brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by

affidavit(s) or declarations(s) will be considered at the return of this Amended Order, and any

uncontested allegation in the petition will be considered admitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

July 10, 2007

Case 3:07-cv-02539-MMC Document 18 Filed 07/10/07 Page 2 of 2