Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06018/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06018-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

ALFRED BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

EDGAR CASTILLO, et al., )

) 

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 02-6018 AWI DLB P 

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S

OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

GRANTING PLAINTIFF EXTENSION

OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE

OPPOSITION 

(DOCS 114, 117)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro per and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. On September 7, 2005, this Court issued its scheduling order

setting the deadline for filing dispositive motions as July 5, 2006. On September 27, 2005,

defendants Barbeiro, Castillo, Curtis, Dulay, Duvall, King, Mathos and Walker filed a motion for

summary judgment to which plaintiff objects as premature. Plaintiff’s objection is overruled

Plaintiff objects to the motion in part because he states he has not received requested discovery from

defendant Bunker. However, the motion is not filed on behalf of defendant Bunker. The Court has

just granted defendant Bunker’s motion to dismiss in part (See Document No. 120). Defendant

Bunker will now be required to respond to the complaint and plaintiff will have the opportunity to

Case 1:02-cv-06018-LJO-DLB Document 126 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

request discovery from defendant Bunker. 

To the extent plaintiff seeks an extension of time in which to file an opposition to

defendants’ motion for summary judgment, that request is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted an

extension of thirty (30) days from this order in which to file any opposition to the motion for

summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 14, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06018-LJO-DLB Document 126 Filed 03/14/06 Page 2 of 2