Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01712/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01712-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEWART MANAGO, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1712 FCD DAD P

vs.

M. KNOWLES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff

seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On October 23, 2006, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the

complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendant J. Chapman was returned unserved

because she has retired, relocated out of state, and the California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation has no forwarding address. Plaintiff must provide additional information to

facilitate service of this defendant. Plaintiff shall promptly seek such information through

discovery, the California Public Records Act, California Government Code § 6250, et seq., or

other means available to plaintiff. 

On March 14, 2007, plaintiff filed a request that the court order the U.S. Marshal

to personally serve defendant Chapman because he believes that the Department of Corrections

Case 2:04-cv-01712-FCD-DAD Document 48 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Rehabilitation (CDCR) must have defendant Chapman’s forwarding address. The court has

already ordered the U.S. Marshal to command all necessary assistance from the CDCR;

therefore, plaintiff’s request will be denied. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff one USM-285 form,

along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the second amended complaint filed September 12,

2005;

2. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and

submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following

documents:

a. One completed USM-285 form for defendant Chapman; 

b. Two copies of the endorsed second complaint filed September 12,

2005; and

c. One completed summons form (if not previously provided) 

or show good cause why he cannot provide such information; and

3. Plaintiff’s March 14, 2007 request that the court order the U.S. Marshal to

personally serve defendant Chapman is denied.

DATED: March 21, 2007.

DAD:bb/4

mana1712.8e

 

Case 2:04-cv-01712-FCD-DAD Document 48 Filed 03/22/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEWART MANAGO, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1712 FCD DAD P

vs.

M. KNOWLES, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 1 completed summons form

 1 completed USM-285 forms

 2 copies of the September 12, 2005 

 Amended Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-01712-FCD-DAD Document 48 Filed 03/22/07 Page 3 of 3