Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03299/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03299-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S DECEMBER 27, 2006 ORDER—C-06-03299 RMW

MAG

E-Filed: 7/16/07

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JAMAR EVANS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

No. C-06-03299 RMW

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S

OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S JUNE 27,

2007 ORDER

[Re Docket No. 53]

Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows parties to file timely objections to

rulings of a magistrate judge in nondispositive matters. Such objections are sustained if the

magistrate judge's order is "found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

On July 9, 2007 plaintiff filed his objection to the magistrate judge's June 27, 2007 Order

Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, contending that the magistrate judge's conclusion that

plaintiff's subpoena to defendants included an incorrect case number was incorrect. See Order at 2-3

("Further, the case number on the subpoena was incorrectly labeled, beginning with '03' instead of

'06'."). The court has reviewed the magistrate judge's order and the subpoenas at issue. The court

finds the order to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law as the plaintiff's subpoena did not

include the correct case number, citing, as the order states, to 03-03299 rather than 06-03299. 

Plaintiff's request to refer discovery matters to a different magistrate judge is denied. 

DATED: 7/16/07

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-03299-RMW Document 55 Filed 07/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S DECEMBER 27, 2006 ORDER—C-06-03299 RMW

MAG 2

A copy of this order was mailed on 7/23/07 to:

Plaintiff:

Jamar Evans 

Post Office Box 25 

Atwater, CA 95301 

Counsel for Defendant(s):

Neysa A. Fligor 

Office of the County Counsel 

70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 9th Fl 

San Jose, CA 95110 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this order to co-counsel, as necessary.

Dated:

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:06-cv-03299-RMW Document 55 Filed 07/16/07 Page 2 of 2