Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-02549/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-02549-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN DUGAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

LLOYDS TSB BANK, PLC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 12-02549 WHA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS

TO SEAL (DKT. NOS. 365, 375)

On December 26, plaintiffs filed an administrative motion to seal (Dkt. No. 365). On

December 30, defendant filed a supporting declaration waiving the sealing of plaintiffs’

opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Exhibit A to the Petley declaration, and

Exhibit 2 to the Stennes declaration. Accordingly, the request to seal the proposed redactions in

plaintiffs’ opposition, Exhibit A to the Petley declaration, and Exhibit 2 to the Stennes

declaration is DENIED. The request to seal Exhibit 4 to the Stennes declaration is GRANTED. 

The request to seal portions of Exhibit A to the Walford declaration is GRANTED IN PART AND

DENIED IN PART. The request to seal the proposed redactions on pages 64–70 is GRANTED. The

request to seal the proposed redactions in paragraphs 4.23, 4.24, 4.27, 4.35, 4.38, 4.40, 4.42,

4.54, 7.25 is GRANTED. The request to seal the remainder of the proposed redactions is DENIED. 

Within FIVE DAYS of this order, plaintiffs shall re-file Exhibit A to the Walford declaration in

accordance with this order.

Case 3:12-cv-02549-WHA Document 393 Filed 01/03/14 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Also on December 26, defendant filed an administrative motion to seal (Dkt. No. 375). 

The request to seal the proposed redactions in defendant’s opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for

partial summary judgment is DENIED. The request to seal the proposed redactions in Exhibit A

to the Hocevar declaration is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:12-cv-02549-WHA Document 393 Filed 01/03/14 Page 2 of 2