Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02744/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02744-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RONALD TURNER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VALLEJO POLICE DEPT., et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-2744 KJM AC P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By order filed April 6, 2015, this court directed plaintiff to complete and return, within 

twenty-one days, the USM-285 forms and other information necessary to effect service of process 

on defendants. See ECF No. 7. That order duplicated this court’s December 23, 2014 order, 

which had accorded plaintiff thirty days to submit the required information. See ECF No. 7. In 

the court’s recent order, plaintiff was informed that “Failure to timely respond to this order will 

result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.” ECF No. 7 at 2. The 

extended time for complying with the court’s order has expired; however, plaintiff has not 

submitted the required documents or otherwise communicated with the court. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:14-cv-02744-KJM-AC Document 8 Filed 05/07/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991). 

DATED: May 6, 2015 

Case 2:14-cv-02744-KJM-AC Document 8 Filed 05/07/15 Page 2 of 2