Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01940/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01940-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND {PROPOSED] ORDER 

AMENDING AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

C 05-01940 MHP

WILLIAM L. ANTHONY (State Bar No. 106908)

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (State Bar No. 173985)

BAS DE BLANK (State Bar No. 191487)

RORY G. BENS (State Bar No. 201674)

THERESA A. SUTTON (State Bar No. 211857)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, California 94025

Telephone: 650-614-7400

Facsimile: 650-614-7401

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiff

TANDBERG ASA and TANDBERG, INC.

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

GEORGE M. NEWCOMBE (202898) gnewcombe@stblaw.com

JEFFREY E. OSTROW (213118) jostrow@stblaw.com

HARRISON J. FRAHN IV (206822) hfrahn@stblaw.com

3330 Hillview Avenue

Palo Alto, California 94304

Telephone: (650) 251-5000

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant

COLLABORATION PROPERTIES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

COLLABORATION PROPERTIES, INC., a 

Nevada Corporation,

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,

v.

TANDBERG ASA, and TANDBERG, INC. a 

Delaware Corporation,

Defendants and CounterPlaintiffs.

Case No. C 05-01940 MHP

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING 

THE AMENDED CASE 

MANAGEMENT ORDER

 (CIVIL L.R. 6-2)

Case 3:05-cv-01940-MHP Document 92 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND {PROPOSED] ORDER 

AMENDING AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

C 05-01940 MHP

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-11 of the Federal District Court for the 

Northern District of California, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Collaboration Properties, Inc. 

(“CPI”) and Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs Tandberg ASA and Tandberg, Inc. (collectively, 

“Tandberg”), by and through their respective counsel, submit this Joint Stipulation and Proposed 

Order Amending the Amended Case Management Order.

WHEREAS, the initial Case Management Conference was held on September 12, 

2005;

WHEREAS, at the Case Management Conference and by Minute Entry filed on 

September 16, 2005, the Court adopted the claim construction schedule proposed by the parties in 

their Joint Case Management Statement (the “Case Management Order”); 

WHEREAS, on January 26, 2006, the Court granted the Joint Stipulation and 

Order Rescheduling Hearing, Briefing Schedule and Case Management Conference, and 

Amending the Case Management Order (the “Amended Case Management Order”);

WHEREAS, the Amended Case Management Order set the deadline for 

completing discovery relating to claim construction under Patent L.R. 4-4 for February 22, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the Amended Case Management Order set the deadline for CPI to file 

its opening brief on claim construction under Patent L.R. 4-5(a) for March 9, 2006;

WHEREAS, the Amended Case Management Order set the deadline for Tandberg 

to file its responsive brief on claim construction under Patent L.R. 4-6 for March 23, 2006;

WHEREAS, the Amended Case Management Order set the deadline for CPI to file 

its reply brief on claim construction under Patent L.R. 4-5(c) for April 3, 2006;

WHEREAS, the Amended Case Management Order set the claim construction 

hearing under Patent L.R. 4-6 for April 17, 2006 or at the Court’s convenience;

WHEREAS, Tandberg requested that the deadline to compete discovery relating to 

claim construction be extended; 

WHEREAS, the parties agreed to a modest extension of the deadline to compete 

discovery relating to claim construction and the claim construction briefing schedule; and

Case 3:05-cv-01940-MHP Document 92 Filed 02/24/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

JOINT STIPULATION AND {PROPOSED] ORDER 

AMENDING AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

C 05-01940 MHP

NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES JOINTLY REQUEST THE FOLLOWING:

Subject to the Court's approval, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-11 of the 

Federal District Court for the Northern District of California, that the deadlines in the Amended 

Case Management Order regarding the deadline to complete discovery and the claim construction 

briefing schedule be extended to the dates in the proposed schedule below.

Schedule Regarding Discovery, Claims Construction and Trial

Subject to the foregoing, the parties have agreed to and propose the following 

modifications to the schedule.

Event The Parties’ Joint Proposal

G. Deadline for completing discovery 

relating to claim construction under 

Patent L.R. 4-4.

March 6, 2006

H. Deadline for CPI to file opening brief 

on claim construction under Patent L.R. 

4-5(a).

March 13, 2006

I. Deadline for Tandberg to file responsive 

brief on claim construction under Patent 

L.R. 4-6.

March 27, 2006

J. Deadline for CPI to file reply brief on 

claim construction under Patent L.R. 

4-5(c).

April 7, 2006

K. Claim construction hearing under Patent 

L.R. 4-6.

April 17, 2006 

or

At the Court’s convenience

 

Case 3:05-cv-01940-MHP Document 92 Filed 02/24/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

JOINT STIPULATION AND {PROPOSED] ORDER 

AMENDING AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

C 05-01940 MHP

Dated: February 17, 2006 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

 /s/

Rory G. Bens

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs

TANDBERG ASA and TANDBERG, INC.

Dated: February 21, 2006 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

 /s/

Harrison J. Frahn IV

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant

COLLABORATION PROPERTIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION

I attest that Rory G. Bens has concurred in the filing of this document.

Dated: February 21, 2006 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

 /s/

Harrison J. Frahn IV

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________ __, 2006 __________________________________________

Honorable Marilyn H. Patel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

February 22

Case 3:05-cv-01940-MHP Document 92 Filed 02/24/06 Page 4 of 4