Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00464/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00464-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KIANTE BROWN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND 

REHABILITATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-0464 JAM AC P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By an order filed March 4, 2015, plaintiff was directed to submit an application to proceed 

in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee to commence this action. See ECF No. 4. Plaintiff 

was informed that failure to comply with the court’s order within thirty days would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff 

has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this 

action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

Case 2:15-cv-00464-JAM-AC Document 7 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: April 14, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-00464-JAM-AC Document 7 Filed 04/15/15 Page 2 of 2