Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00787/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00787-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 423
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157
Cause of Action: 28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CHICAGO_1268853_1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Richard F. Levy (admitted pro hac vice)

C. Steven Tomashefsky (admitted pro hac vice)

Eric A. Sacks (admitted pro hac vice)

Jason J. Green (admitted pro hac vice)

JENNER & BLOCK LLP

One IBM Plaza

Chicago, IL 60611

Phone: (312) 222-9350

Facsimile: (312) 527-0484

Kenneth E. Keller (State Bar No. 71450)

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP

114 Sansome Street, 4

th

Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Phone: (415) 249-8330

Facsimile: (415) 249-8333

Attorneys for Plaintiff EXDS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN JOSE DIVISION)

In re:

EXDS, INC. (f/k/a EXODUS

COMMUNICATIONS, INC.), et al.,

Debtor.

Case No. C05-787 PVT

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND

BRIEFING DATES FOR SHARP

DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. AND

SHARP LAFAYETTE LLC’S MOTION

FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EXDS, INC. (f/k/a EXODUS

COMMUNICATIONS, INC.),

Plaintiff,

v.

DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

SHARP DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,

INC., and SHARP LAFAYETTE, LLC,

Defendants.

Case 5:05-cv-00787-PVT Document 169 Filed 06/08/05 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C05-787 PVT

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties to this action hereby agree that this Stipulation be entered, subject to the approval

of the Court, as follows:

WHEREAS the hearing on Sharp Development Company, Inc. and Sharp Lafayette LLC's

(“Sharp’s”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is currently set for July 12, 2005 at 10:00 a.m.;

WHEREAS EXDS’ Opposition to the Motion is currently due on June 7, 2005;

WHEREAS Sharp’s Reply in support of the Motion is currently due on June 24, 2005;

WHEREAS the deposition of Janice Fetzer is currently scheduled for June 28, 2005 (subject to

Ms. Fetzer’s availability);

WHEREAS the parties wish to complete the deposition of Ms. Fetzer prior to filing their

Opposition and Reply papers;

IT IS HEREBY STIPLATED AND AGREED THAT, subject to Court approval, the hearing

on Sharp’s Motion shall be continued from July 12, 2005 to August 2, 2005. The parties propose the

following briefing schedule:

• EXDS’s Opposition Brief due July 8, 2005;

• Sharp’s Reply Brief due July 19, 2005;

• Hearing on Sharp’s Motion on August 2, 2005

STIPULATED AND AGREED:

Dated: June 6, 2005 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP

By: _______________/s/________________________

Kenneth E. Keller

Attorneys for EXDS, Inc.

Dated: June 6, 2005 HOPKINS & CARLEY

By: _______________/s/________________________

Jay M. Ross

Attorneys for Sharp Development Company, Inc.

and Sharp Lafayette LLC

Case 5:05-cv-00787-PVT Document 169 Filed 06/08/05 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C05-787 PVT

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The parties having stipulated, and good cause appearing, the hearing on Sharp Development

Company, Inc. and Sharp Lafayette LLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is continued to

August 2, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. and that the following briefing schedule shall apply:

• EXDS’s Opposition Brief is due July 8, 2005; and

• Sharp’s Reply Brief is due July 19, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________ ________________________________________

THE HON. CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

Case 5:05-cv-00787-PVT Document 169 Filed 06/08/05 Page 3 of 3