Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00496/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00496-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAY L. SELLERS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0496 LKK GGH PS

vs.

LEIGH, THE CAFÉ DIVA, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed March 30, 2007, plaintiff was ordered to submit the appropriate

filing fee or a completed application and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis within twenty

days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed. The twenty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s

order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

Case 2:07-cv-00496-LKK -GGH Document 5 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 6/27/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

sellers.fifp

Case 2:07-cv-00496-LKK -GGH Document 5 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 2