Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05808/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05808-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING Case No.: 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)

pandre@kramerlevin.com

LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)

lkobialka@kramerlevin.com 

JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)

jhannah@kramerlevin.com 

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS

 & FRANKEL LLP

990 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 752-1700

Facsimile: (650) 752-1800

Counsel for Plaintiff

FINJAN, INC.

JENNIFER A. KASH (Bar No. 203679)

jenniferkash@quinnemauel.com

SEAN PAK (Bar No. 219032)

seanpak@quinnemanuel.com

IMAN LORDGOOEI (Bar No. 251320)

imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com

SAM STAKE (Bar No. 257916)

samstake@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4788

Telephone: (415) 875-6600

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

Counsel for Defendants

PROOFPOINT, INC. AND ARMORIZE 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

FINJAN, INC., 

Plaintiff,

v.

PROOFPOINT, INC. AND ARMORIZE 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendants. 

Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING 

LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY 

CONTENTIONS 

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 141 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 5
1

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING Case No.: 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-6, Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. 

(“Finjan”) and Defendant Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (“Defendants”) 

(collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following 

request for leave to amend invalidity contentions served under Patent Local Rule 3-6:

WHEREAS, pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-1, Finjan served its disclosure of asserted claims 

and infringement contentions (“Infringement Contentions”) on April 17, 2014; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3, Defendants served their Invalidity Contentions 

on June 9, 2014;

WHEREAS, the Court struck Finjan’s infringement contentions, in part, on April 2, 2015, but 

granted leave, in part, for Finjan to amend its Infringement Contentions by April 23, 2015; 

WHEREAS, the Court extended the briefing and hearing schedule for claim construction and 

extended the close of fact discovery to September 2, 2015;

WHEREAS, the requested leave should not have any material effect on the remaining schedule 

in this case; 

WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the Parties agreed that there is good cause for 

Defendants to supplement their invalidity contentions to the extent Finjan’s amended infringement 

contentions provide new or different interpretation of the asserted claims;

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate to and request an order granting Defendants 

leave to supplement their invalidity contentions by June 8, 2015 to the extent that Finjan’s amended 

infringement contentions provide new or different interpretation of the asserted claims.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 141 Filed 04/21/15 Page 2 of 5
2

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING Case No.: 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: April 17, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP

/s/ Paul J. Andre 

Paul J. Andre (State Bar No. 196585)

Lisa Kobialka (State Bar No. 191404)

James Hannah (State Bar No. 237978)

Hannah Lee (State Bar No. 253197)

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS

& FRANKEL LLP

990 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 752-1700

Facsimile: (650) 752-1800

pandre@kramerlevin.com

lkobialka@kramerlevin.com

jhannah@kramerlevin.com

hlee@kramerlevin.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

FINJAN, INC.

Dated: April 17, 2015

QUINN EMANUAL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN LLP

/s/ Jennifer A. Kash

Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679)

Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)

Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)

Sam Stake (Bar No. 257916)

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4788

Telephone: (415) 875-6600

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

jenniferkash@quinnemauel.com

seanpak@quinnemanuel.com

imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com

samstake@quinnemanuel.com 

Counsel for Defendants

PROOFPOINT, INC. AND ARMORIZE 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 141 Filed 04/21/15 Page 3 of 5
3

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING Case No.: 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.

/s/ Jennifer A. Kash

Jennifer A. Kash

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 141 Filed 04/21/15 Page 4 of 5
4

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING Case No.: 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

There being a showing of good cause based on the Parties’ stipulation, Proofpoint, Inc. and 

Armorize Technologies, Inc. may supplement their invalidity contentions by June 8, 2015 to the extent 

that Finjan’s Amended Infringement Contentions provide new or different interpretation of the asserted 

claims.

DATED: 4/21/2015 ________________________________

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 141 Filed 04/21/15 Page 5 of 5