Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01080/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01080-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL CHAVEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES YATES, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:09-cv-1080-AWI-SKO PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND STRIKING 

SECTION II OF MOTION TO DISMISS

(Docs. 34 and 41)

Plaintiff Michael Chavez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 19, 2009. This action is proceeding 

on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Ehrman, Igbinosa, Kushner, Diep, 

Hayden, Ahlin, Pineda, and Yates. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 3, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 

Recommendations which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that 

Objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within five days. No 

Objections were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Case 1:09-cv-01080-AWI-SKO Document 43 Filed 10/30/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on October 3, 2013, is adopted 

in full; and

2. Section II of Defendants’ motion to dismiss is STRICKEN, pursuant to the 

rule of mandate.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 29, 2013 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-01080-AWI-SKO Document 43 Filed 10/30/13 Page 2 of 2