Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03320/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03320-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. 3:14-cv-03320-LB

ORDER

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

JOSE DANIEL CASTILLO-ANTONIO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CUAUHTEMOC BARRON, MOHAMMED

VAHDATPOUR, CHRISTINE

VAHDATPOUR, and DOES 1-50, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. 3:14-cv-03320-LB

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This is an ADA case that is subject to the case-management deadlines set forth in this district’s

General Order 56. The plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint on April 6, 2015. The plaintiff

filed a proof of service, but no defendant has appeared (except that one defendant acknowledged

service). Nothing on the docket suggests any activity that is required by General Order 56 (such as a

joint site inspection or a “Notice of Need for Mediation”). (See General Order 56 ¶¶ 3, 6.) Under the

circumstances, the court orders the plaintiff to show cause in writing by September 29, 2015 why

this action should not dismissed without prejudice for his failure to prosecute it. The response must

include any request for a change in the scheduling order at ECF No. 4 and include the plaintiff’s

plan for proceeding in the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 10, 2015 _______________________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-03320-LB Document 25 Filed 09/10/15 Page 1 of 1