Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-03618/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-03618-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

A/72353733.1/3002631-0000326417 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING C 07-03618 JF

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

GREGORY LIPPETZ (SBN 154228) 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 

Telephone: (415) 393-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 

gregory.lippetz@bingham.com 

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

RICHARD S. TAFFET Pro Hac Vice 

(NY SBN 1721182) 

399 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10022-4689 

Telephone: (212) 705-7000 

Facsimile: (212) 752-5378 

richard.taffet@bingham.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant 

SANDISK CORPORATION 

Kirkland & Ellis LLP 

JENNY N. LEE (SBN 247684) 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1501 

Telephone: (415) 439-1400 

Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 

jlee@kirkland.com 

Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs 

Lucent Technologies Inc. and 

Alcatel-Lucent, S.A. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

SANDISK CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. and 

ALCATEL-LUCENT, S.A., 

 Defendants. 

No. C 07-03618 JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING 

Date: December 21, 2007 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Location: Courtroom 3 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM 

**E-filed 12/18/07** ---------------

Case 5:07-cv-03618-JF Document 66 Filed 12/18/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

A/72353733.1/3002631-0000326417 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING C 07-03618 JF 

Pursuant Civil L.R. 6-1(a) and Civil L.R. 7-7(b)(1), the parties stipulate to the 

following: 

WHEREAS, on July 17, 2007, this action for declaratory judgment of patent noninfringement and invalidity was commenced in United States District Court, Northern District 

of California, San Jose Division; 

WHEREAS, on October 12, 2007, defendants Lucent Technologies, Inc. and 

Alcatel Lucent, S.A. (collectively “Lucent”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice or 

Stay Pending Resolution of Appeal in Related Case (“Lucent’s Motion”); 

WHEREAS, on October 26, 2007, plaintiff SanDisk Corporation (“SanDisk”) 

filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and a Motion to Dismiss Lucent’s Counterclaim; 

WHEREAS, on November 30, 2007, the Court heard argument on SanDisk’s 

Motions, and took the motions under submission. The Court also set a Case Management 

Conference for January 25, 2008; 

WHEREAS, the hearing on Lucent’s Motion is calendared for December 21, 

2007; 

WHEREAS, for efficiency, SanDisk requested, and Lucent agreed, to continue 

the hearing on Lucent’s Motion until January 25, 2008, the date of the Court ordered CMC; 

WHEREAS, the parties have not previously stipulated to continue the hearing. 

NOW THEREFORE, it is STIPULATED, AGREED AND ORDERED as 

follows: 

The hearing on defendant Lucent’s Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice or Stay 

Pending Resolution of Appeal in Related Case will be continued to January 25, 2008 at a time 

to be determined by the Court. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 5:07-cv-03618-JF Document 66 Filed 12/18/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

A/72353733.1/3002631-0000326417 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING C 07-03618 JF 

DATED: December 17, 2007 

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

By: /s/ Gregory L. Lippetz 

Gregory L. Lippetz 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant 

SanDisk Corporation 

DATED: December 17, 2007 

Kirkland & Ellis LLP 

By: /s/ Jenny N. Lee 

Jenny N. Lee 

Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs 

Lucent Technologies Inc. and 

Alcatel-Lucent, S.A. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ________________ By:________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

12/18/07

Case 5:07-cv-03618-JF Document 66 Filed 12/18/07 Page 3 of 3