Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05528/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05528-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Grounds L, T, U, V sub-parts 2-5 and 7-9, W sub-parts 2-4, X, Y, and Z, were dismissed from the action as

unexhausted. (Court Doc. 36.) 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARK ALLEN KIMBROUGH, CASE NO. CV-F-04-5528 AWI DLB HC

Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT 

TO SUBMIT ANSWER ADDRESSING

vs. MERITS OF EXHAUSTED CLAIMS

ROD HICKMAN, et. al., 

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Pursuant to the Court’s order of August 24, 2005, denying Respondent’s motion to dismiss

the petition as time-barred and granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss the unexhausted claims,

Respondent shall submit an answer addressing the merits of the petition.1 

Accordingly, within forty-five (45) days from the date of service of this order, Respondent

shall submit an answer addressing the merits of the petition. Within forty-five (45) days from the 

///

///

///

Case 1:04-cv-05528-AWI-DLB Document 37 Filed 09/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

date Respondent files its answer, Petitioner may file a traverse. All other provisions set forth in the

Court’s July 12, 2004, order to file a response remain in full force and effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 15, 2005 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05528-AWI-DLB Document 37 Filed 09/16/05 Page 2 of 2