Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06410/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06410-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL 

RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

CONTINUING COURT-ORDERED 

DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No 07-CV6410-EDL 

Christopher T. Casamassima (CA Bar No. 211280) 

Email: ccasamassima@kirkland.com

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

777 South Figueroa Street 

Los Angeles, California 90017-5800 

Telephone: (213) 680-8400 

Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 

Attorneys for Defendant EVA Airways 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MEOR ADLIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON 

BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AIR NEW ZEALAND, ALL NIPPON 

AIRWAYS, CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, 

CHINA AIRLINES, EVA AIRWAYS, JAPAN 

AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL, MALAYSIA 

AIRLINES, NORTHWEST AIRLINES, 

QANTAS AIRWAYS, SINGAPORE 

AIRLINES, THAI AIRWAYS, UNITED 

AIRLINES, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 07-CV6410-EDL 

JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 EXTENDING 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

AND CONTINUING COURT-ORDERED 

DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte 

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, and in light of the related “Motion for 

Transfer and Consolidation of Related Actions to the Northern District of California Pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1407” now pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”), 

Plaintiff Meor Adlin (“Plaintiff”), and defendant EVA Airways (“Defendant”), through counsel, 

hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

Case 3:07-cv-06410-EDL Document 15 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-06410-CRB Document 16 Filed 02/08/08 Page 1 of 4
 2 JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL 

RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

CONTINUING COURT-ORDERED 

DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No 07-CV6410-EDL 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant’s time to answer, 

move or otherwise plead is enlarged until the later of: (1) the date when Defendant would 

otherwise be required to a file a response pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12; or (2) 

45 days after the JPML grants, denies, or otherwise disposes of the pending motion. If a 

consolidated amended complaint is filed by Plaintiff in a single transferee Court and served on 

Defendant, and Plaintiff’s counsel is acting as Lead Counsel, Plaintiff agree that Defendants’ 

time to answer, move, or otherwise plead is enlarged until 45 days after such service. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this Stipulation does not 

constitute a waiver by Defendant of any defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack 

of personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, improper venue, sufficiency of service of 

process or service of process. Nothing in this paragraph shall obligate Defendant to answer, 

move, or otherwise respond to any complaint until the time provided in the preceding paragraph. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that, given the length of time 

likely to be required by the JPML to resolve the pending motion, the efficiency in having one 

case management schedule set for consolidated class actions rather than proceeding separately, 

and the desirability of having the court to whom the matter is ultimately assigned set its own case 

management schedule, Plaintiff and Defendant agree that the dates set in the December 19, 2007 

Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference (and the deadlines triggered by such 

conference) should be continued. The Initial Case Management Conference will be continued to 

a date within 45 days of the JPML granting, denying or otherwise disposing of the Section 1407 

motion before it. After such action by the JPML, Plaintiff and Defendant will meet and confer 

and submit proposed dates for the Initial Case Management Conference. 

Case 3:07-cv-06410-EDL Document 15 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-06410-CRB Document 16 Filed 02/08/08 Page 2 of 4
 3 JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL 

RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

CONTINUING COURT-ORDERED 

DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No 07-CV6410-EDL 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: February 5, 2008 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

By: /s/ Christopher T. Casamassima

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

777 South Figueroa Street 

Los Angeles, California 90017-5800 

Telephone: (213) 680-8400 

Facsimile: (213) 680 8500 

Email: ccasamassima@kirkland.com

Counsel for Defendant EVA Airways 

 

Dated: February 5, 2008 KABATECK BROWN KELLNER 

By: _____/s/ Reza Sina_____________

RICHARD L. KELLNER 

REZA SINA 

644 S. Figueroa Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Telephone: (213) 217-5000 

Facsimile: (213) 217-5010 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 3:07-cv-06410-EDL Document 15 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-06410-CRB Document 16 Filed 02/08/08 Page 3 of 4
 4 JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL 

RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

CONTINUING COURT-ORDERED 

DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No 07-CV6410-EDL 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT, to conserve party and 

judicial resources, and in light of the proceedings currently pending before the JPML to 

consolidate and transfer all pending Pacific Air Transportation cases to one court, dates set in the 

December 19, 2007 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference (and the deadlines 

triggered by such conference) are hereby continued. The Initial Case Management Conference 

will be continued to a date within 45 days of the JPML granting, denying or otherwise disposing 

of the Section 1407 motion before it. After such action by the JPML, Plaintiff and Defendant will 

meet and confer and submit proposed dates for the Initial Case Management Conference. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint status statement to the 

Court on ______, 2008. 

Dated: [__________] [__], 2008 __________________________________ 

 Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte 

 Judge of the United States District Court 

Case 3:07-cv-06410-EDL Document 15 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 4 of 4

April 1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order applies to all of the parties in this case.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

February 8

Case 3:07-cv-06410-CRB Document 16 Filed 02/08/08 Page 4 of 4