Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01456/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01456-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEAN SANDHU,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS LYNCH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-01456-SK 

ORDER (1) SETTING A HEARING 

DATE AND (2) DIRECTING 

DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE

Regarding Docket Nos. 14, 16, and 17

Plaintiff Sean Sandhu (“Sandhu”) filed the following two motions on May 4, 2016 against 

Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Bhogart, LLC’: (1) motion to dismiss counter-claims and (2) 

motion to strike punitive damages. On May 4, 2016, Sandhu also filed a motion against Bhogart 

and Defendant Thomas Lynch IV (collectively, “Defendants”) to strike affirmative defenses. 

Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rules 7-3(a), the opposition briefs were due by May 18, 

2016. To date, no opposition briefs have been filed.

Therefore, Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE (“OSC”) in writing, 

by no later than June 15, 2016, why the pending motions should not be granted in light of their 

failure to file timely opposition briefs or statements of non-opposition. If Defendants seek to file 

substantive responses to Sandhu’s motions, Defendants must demonstrate good cause for failing to 

file their opposition briefs in a timely fashion. If Defendants fail to file a response to the OSC by

June 15, 2016, the Court shall deem the motions as unopposed. If Defendants seek to file 

opposition briefs and demonstrate good cause, the Court will permit Sandhu to file reply briefs.

///

///

///

Case 3:16-cv-01456-SK Document 27 Filed 06/08/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The Court notes that the noticed hearing date was vacated by the Reassignment Order and, 

thus, HEREBY RESETS the hearing on these three pending motions for July 20, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 8, 2016

______________________________________

SALLIE KIM

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cv-01456-SK Document 27 Filed 06/08/16 Page 2 of 2