Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05446/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05446-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 , CASE NO. ______________________ 

Plaintiff(s), 

 

 v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

 , 

 Defendant(s). 

_______________________________/

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

 Court Processes:

侊 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

侊 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

侊 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

 Private Process:

侊 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ 

_____________________________________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

侊 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

侊 other requested deadline _____________________________________________ 

Dated:___________ ____________________________ 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated:____________ ____________________________ 

 Attorney for Defendant 

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

*Eolas makes this filing without waiving at least its arguments and

challenges in its motion to dismiss (Dkt. 37).

Google Inc. 15-cv-05446-JST

Eolas Technologies Inc.

To be mutually agreed on

by the parties.

90 days from the issuance of a Markman order in this case.

February 17, 2016 /s David A. Perlson

February 17, 2016 /s John B. Campbell

Case 3:15-cv-05446-JST Document 49 Filed 02/18/16 Page 1 of 2
侊 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

侊 The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________________________ 

UNITED STATES JUDGE 

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11 

 Page 2 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

February 18, 2016

Case 3:15-cv-05446-JST Document 49 Filed 02/18/16 Page 2 of 2