Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01339/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01339-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Isiah Hill,

 Petitioner,

vs.

William White, et al.,

 Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-10-1339-PHX-PGR (LOA)

 

 ORDER

 

Having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge Anderson’s Report and

Recommendation in light of the petitioner’s objections thereto (Doc. 28), the Court

finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly concluded that the petitioner’s motions

for entry of default, summary judgment, and other relief based on the

respondents’ failure to answer (Docs. 21-24) are meritless at this time because

the respondents currently have until November 24, 2010 in which to file their

answer to the petitioner’s habeas petition. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(Doc. 27) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s Motion to Request

Summary Judgement F.R.C.P. 56(c)(A) - with Request to be Expedited ... (Doc.

Case 2:10-cv-01339-PGR Document 29 Filed 11/03/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

- 2 -

21), Petitioner’s Reply” Move for Dismissal of #CR 2006-009614-001 with

Prejudice/Expedited Release (Doc. 22), Petitioner[‘s] Motion to Expedite his

Reply (Doc. 23), and the petitioner’s Motion for Default Judgement ... with

Request to be Expedited ... (Doc. 24) are all denied.

DATED this 2nd day of November, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-01339-PGR Document 29 Filed 11/03/10 Page 2 of 2