Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01574/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01574-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

---

STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER 1 (CIVIL NO. 2:15-cv-01574-EFB) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

GEORGETTE ROGERS,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner 

 Of Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CIVIL NO. 2:15-cv-01574-EFB 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER FOR DEFENDANT’S FIRST 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND 

TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Georgette Rogers (“Plaintiff”) and Carolyn W. 

Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and 

through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 30 days to 

respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and/or to file any cross-motions. The current due 

date is March 18, 2016. The new due date will be April 18, 2016. This is the first extension of time 

requested by Defendant and the third extension of time requested in the above-captioned matter. 

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

United States Attorney 

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL 

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

Social Security Administration 

SHARON LAHEY 

California State Bar No. 263027 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

160 Spear Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 977-8963 

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 

E-Mail: Sharon.Lahey@ssa.com 

Case 2:15-cv-01574-EFB Document 20 Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER 2 (CIVIL NO. 2:15-cv-01574-EFB) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defense counsel requires additional time to adequately address the issues Plaintiff raises in her motion 

for summary judgment due to workload demands, which include preparing nine dispositive motions 

during the remainder of March 2016. 

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: March 16, 2016 PETER BRIXIE 

 Attorney At Law 

 

 By: /s/ Peter Brixie* 

 PETER BRIXIE 

 (*As authorized by email on March 16, 2016) 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: March 16, 2016 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

 United States Attorney 

 

 

 By: /s/ Sharon Lahey 

 SHARON LAHEY 

 Special Assistant U. S. Attorney 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 

ORDER 

Pursuant to stipulation, good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant shall file her 

cross-motion and response to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on or before April 18, 2016. 

Plaintiff shall file any reply thereto on or before May 2, 2016. 

 

DATED: March 16, 2016. ____________________________ 

 HON. EDMUND F. BRENNAN 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:15-cv-01574-EFB Document 20 Filed 03/17/16 Page 2 of 2