Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01824/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01824-35/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

*E-FILED 2/8/08*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GREGORY NEAL GRIMES, 

Plaintiff,

 v.

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant. /

NO. C 05-01824 RS

ORDER RE TIMOTHY

METCALF DESIGNATIONS

 The objections to the introduction of testimony from the deposition of Timothy Metcalf are

sustained or overruled as set forth below. Where reference is made only to page numbers, the

specific lines affected by this ruling are those identified by the parties in their submissions to the

Court.

Plaintiff’s Designations

Pp. 21-22: Sustained, lack of relevance.

Pp. 26-28: Overruled.

Pp. 29-30: Overruled.

Pp. 35-43: Sustained, lack of relevance and cumulative.

P. 41: The additional objections to the testimony regarding Exhibit 338 are moot, in light of

Case 5:05-cv-01824-RS Document 355 Filed 02/08/08 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

C 05-01824 RS

2

the ruling that none of this testimony is admissible.

Pp. 43-47: In light of the rulings above, no basis remains to admit this testimony.

Pp. 47-48: Overruled. 

P. 52: In light of the rulings above, no basis remains to admit this testimony.

Pp. 53-56: Sustained, lack of relevance and cumulative.

Pp. 57-58: Overruled

Pp. 58-60: Sustained, lack of relevance, lack of foundation, speculative.

Pp. 61-64: Overruled

Pp. 65: Sustained, lack of foundation, speculative.

Pp. 78-79: Sustained, without prejudice to defendant’s right to introduce the testimony

through its counter-designations.

Defendant’s Counter-designations

Pp. 63-64: Overruled.

Pp. 65-66: Overruled.

Pp. 70-71: Overruled.

P. 73: Sustained, hearsay.

Pp. 74-75: Sustained, hearsay.

Pp. 75-76: Overruled.

 Pp. 92-93: Overruled.

Pp. 103-104: Overruled.

Pp. 106: Overruled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 8, 2008 

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01824-RS Document 355 Filed 02/08/08 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

C 05-01824 RS

3

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN GIVEN TO:

Darci Elaine Burrell courtmail@boxerlaw.com

Claudia Center ccenter@las-elc.org, lbossing@las-elc.org, lkapros@las-elc.org

Kathryn Burkett Dickson kbdickson@dicksonross.com, courtmail@boxerlaw.com,

pwach@dicksonross.com

Elizabeth A. Falcone elizabethfalcone@paulhastings.com, vilmabottger@paulhastings.com

Thomas E. Geidt tomgeidt@paulhastings.com, jeffsmith@paulhastings.com

E. Jeffrey Grube , Esq jeffgrube@paulhastings.com, patricialawson@paulhastings.com

Kerri N. Harper kerriharper@paulhastings.com, jeffsmith@paulhastings.com

Jean K Hyams courtmail@boxerlaw.com

Leslie Fran Levy courtmail@boxerlaw.com

Sana Swe sanaswe@paulhastings.com, daliaromhill@sbcglobal.net

Maurice Kirby Collette Wilcox kirbywilcox@paulhastings.com, janetgogna@paulhastings.com

Julie Anne Wilkinson JulieWilkinson@paulhastings.com, helendevol@paulhastings.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not

registered for e-filing under the Court's CM/ECF program. 

Dated: 2/8/08 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Chambers 

Case 5:05-cv-01824-RS Document 355 Filed 02/08/08 Page 3 of 3