Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00865/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00865-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY ESKRIDGE, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0865 LKK GGH P

vs.

A. CORREA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On December 15, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s order

filed December 5, 2005, denying his motion for the appointment of counsel. The court construes

plaintiff’s objections as a request for reconsideration of the December 5, 2005, order. Pursuant

to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed December 5, 2005, is affirmed. 

DATED: January 12, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

esk865.850

Case 2:04-cv-00865-LKK -GGH Document 42 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 1