Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_00-cv-02287/USCOURTS-cand-4_00-cv-02287-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING

ANSWER TO THIRD CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

MASTER FILE NO. C-00-2287 PJH

sf-2243859

MELVIN R. GOLDMAN (BAR NO. 34097)

TERRI GARLAND (BAR NO. 169563)

D. ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ (BAR NO. 162587)

MARGARET L. WU (BAR NO. 184167)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: (415) 268-7000

Telefacsimile: (415) 268-7522

mwu@mofo.com

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re HARMONIC, INC.

SECURITIES LITIGATION

____________________________________________ This Document Relates To:

ALL ACTIONS

Master File No. C-00-2287 PJH

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING ANSWER TO 

THIRD CONSOLIDATED 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 4:00-cv-02287-PJH Document 179 Filed 12/21/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING

ANSWER TO THIRD CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

MASTER FILE NO. C-00-2287 PJH

sf-2243859

3

WHEREAS, on December 11, 2006, this Court issued an order granting in part and denying 

in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Specified Allegations in Third 

Consolidated Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, the Court has set a case management conference in this action for January 25, 

2007; and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to Defendants’ request for an extension to answer the 

Third Consolidated Amended Complaint; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the parties, through their 

respective counsel of record, that Defendants will have until January 24, 2007, to answer the Third 

Consolidated Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Submitted by:

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

/s/ Margaret L. Wu

Dated: December 18, 2006

Counsel for Defendants Harmonic, Inc., Anthony 

J. Ley, Robin N. Dickson, Moshe Nazerathy, Floyd Kvamme, David Lane, Barry Lemieux, and Michel Vaillaud

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & 

ROBBINS LLP

/s/ Reed Kathrein

Dated: December 18, 2006

BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE 

SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP

SCHOENGOLD, SPORN, LAITMAN & LOMETTI, 

P.C.

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

I, Margaret L. Wu, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Answer to Third Consolidated Amended Complaint. 

Case 4:00-cv-02287-PJH Document 179 Filed 12/21/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING

ANSWER TO THIRD CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

MASTER FILE NO. C-00-2287 PJH

sf-2243859

3

In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Reed Kathrein of Lerach Coughlin 

Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP has concurred in this filing. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2006 Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Judge

December 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:00-cv-02287-PJH Document 179 Filed 12/21/06 Page 3 of 3