Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05153/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05153-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E. & J. GALLO WINERY, )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

)

CANTINE RALLO, S. p. A., )

)

)

Defendant. )

 )

1:04cv5153 OWW DLB

ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR

NOVEMBER 1, 2006 MOTIONS

On October 6, 2006, plaintiff E. & J. Gallo Winery (“Gallo”) filed a renewed motion for

leave to serve additional interrogatories on defendant Cantine Rallo, S.p.A.(“Rallo”). On

October 6, 2006, Rallo also filed a motion to compel production of documents and responses to

interrogatories from Gallo. The parties each scheduled their respective motions for October 27,

2006. 

On October 12, 2006, the Court conducted a telephonic conference. Kathyleen A.

O’Brien appeared on behalf of Gallo and Jonathon Moskin appeared on behalf of Rallo. As a

result of the conference, the Court orders the following with respect to these motions:

1. The motions are continued to November 1, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9;

2. The parties are no longer subject to the meet and confer requirements of Local

Rule 37-251. With respect the November 1, 2006 motions, the parties shall file

Case 1:04-cv-05153-LJO -DLB Document 146 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

their respective briefs in support of and in opposition to the motions in accordance

with the schedule ordered by the Court on September 26, 2006 as follows:

a. The moving party shall file its opening brief on or before

October 24, 2006;

b. The responding party shall file its opposition brief on or

before October 27, 2006; and 

c. There shall be no reply briefs filed;

3. All further discovery motions in this action shall be filed in accordance with Local

Rule 78-230.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 13, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05153-LJO -DLB Document 146 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 2