Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01107/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01107-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on October 18, 2007, as 1

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Inmate Gone - Forwarding Time Expired. 

However, plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s

prior address is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VERYL E. KNOWLES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:07-cv-01107-LJO-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 4)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Veryl E. Knowles (“plaintiff”), is a federal

prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant

to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On October 1, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

a Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days. To

date, plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:07-cv-01107-LJO -SMS Document 6 Filed 01/22/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed October 1, 2007,

are ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on plaintiff’s failure

to obey the court’s order of July 31, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 20, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01107-LJO -SMS Document 6 Filed 01/22/08 Page 2 of 2