Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00516/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00516-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHS West:260945011.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CHANGING TIME

CASE NO. CV 10-00516 MHP

PETER M. HART (STATE BAR NO. 198691)

hartpeter@msn.com

KIMBERLY WESTMORELAND (STATE BAR NO. 237919)

kwestmoreland.loph@gmail.com

LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART

13592 Bora Bora Way, F-320

Marina Del Rey, CA 90292

Telephone: +1-310-478-5789

Facsimile: +1-509-561-6441

KENNETH H. YOON (STATE BAR NO. 198443)

kyoon@yoon-law.com

LINDA WHITEHEAD (STATE BAR NO. 222799)

lwhitehead@yoon-law.com

MELISSA COYLE (STATE BAR NO. 232775)

mcoyle@yoon-law.com

LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH H. YOON

One Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200

Los Angeles, CA 90017

Telephone: +1-213-612-0988

Facsimile: +1-213-947-1211

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ANTHONY VILLA

Attorneys for Defendant on next page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY VILLA, as an individual and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a 

corporation; and DOES 1 through 50 

inclusive, 

Defendants.

Case No. CV 10-00516 MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CHANGING HEARING DATE 

AND TIME TO FILE MOTIONS, 

OPPOSITIONS/DISCOVERY 

STATEMENTS, AND REPLIES 

Case 3:10-cv-00516-MHP Document 22 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CHANGING TIME

CASE NO. CV 10-00516 MHP

PATRICIA K. GILLETTE (STATE BAR NO. 74461)

pgillette@orrick.com

ANDREW R. LIVINGSTON (STATE BAR NO. 148646)

alivingston@orrick.com

AMIRA B. DAY (STATE BAR NO. 239045)

aday@orrick.com

LENA P. RYAN (STATE BAR NO. 258782)

lenaryan@orrick.com

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

The Orrick Building

405 Howard Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-2669

Telephone: +1-415-773-5700

Facsimile: +1-415-773-5759

Attorneys for Defendant

TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, plaintiff Anthony Villa (“Plaintiff”) and 

defendant Tyco Electronics Corporation, (“Defendant”), hereby request that the Court grant the 

parties an extension of the deadlines to file motions, oppositions/discovery statements, and replies 

as outlined below. In support of this request, the parties represent and stipulate as follows:

1. On May 17, 2010, following the case management conference, the Court 

issued a scheduling order setting July 19, 2010 as the deadline to file motions; August 2, 2010 as 

the deadline to file oppositions/discovery statements; August 9, 2010 as the deadline to file 

replies; and August 23, 2010 as the hearing date for motions. 

2. Defendant took Plaintiff’s deposition on June 17, 2010, which was the 

earliest date available for the parties following the case management conference. 

3. Defendant contends there are additional documents necessary for its motion 

for summary judgment, including telephone and bank/credit card records, though Plaintiff has 

testified that he has produced all of the documents requested in his possession. The parties are 

meeting and conferring in an effort to resolve this issue.

4. Defendant also did not receive a final copy of the transcript of Plaintiff’s 

deposition until the evening of June 29, 2010. Thus, although plaintiff's deposition was 

scheduled for the earliest date available for the parties following the case management 

conference, with the timing of the deposition and the turn-around time for the deposition 

Case 3:10-cv-00516-MHP Document 22 Filed 07/01/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CHANGING TIME

CASE NO. CV 10-00516 MHP

transcript, Defendant did not receive a final copy of the transcript until three weeks prior to the 

current deadline to file motions. Further, the fourth of July holiday falls right in this period, and 

defense counsel has travel plans with their respective families which they cannot reschedule. 

Defendant believes that it needs sufficient time to review the transcript and conduct any necessary

further investigation before it can file its motion for summary judgment.

5. Extending the current deadlines as outlined below will allow the parties 

time to meet and confer regarding additional documents Defendant contends it needs and for 

Defendant to review the final deposition transcript in order to prepare its motion for summary

judgment. It will also allow sufficient time for Plaintiff to oppose Defendant’s motion and/or file 

a discovery statement, and for Defendant to reply to Plaintiff’s opposition prior to the hearing on 

the motion.

 Motions to be filed: 8/13/10

 Oppositions/Discovery Statement to be filed: 8/27/10

 Reply to be filed: 9/3/10

 Hearing: 9/17/10 or as soon thereafter as the Court prefers.

For the reasons stated above, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant their 

request to extend the current deadlines to the dates outlined in Paragraph 5 above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 30, 20010

/s/___________

KIMBERLY WESTMORELAND 

LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ANTHONY VILLA

Dated: June 29, 2010

_/s/__________

AMIRA B. DAY

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE 

LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

Case 3:10-cv-00516-MHP Document 22 Filed 07/01/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CHANGING TIME

CASE NO. CV 10-00516 MHP

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the hearing date and deadlines to file motions, 

oppositions/discovery statements, and replies shall be extended as follows:

 Motions to be filed: 8/13/10

 Oppositions/Discovery Statement to be filed: 8/27/10

 Replies to be filed: 9/3/10

 Hearing set for : ______________________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________, 2010

Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel 

United States District Judge

9/20/2010 at 2:00 p.m. July 1

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:10-cv-00516-MHP Document 22 Filed 07/01/10 Page 4 of 4