Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00158/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00158-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSE DEJESUS RODRIGUEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VERONICA VEGA, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-0158 GGH PS 

ORDER 

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915 m .1

Presently before the court is plaintiff’s request for judicial notice, filed November 12, 

2015. The request seeks judicial notice of an administrative decision by the California 

Department of Health Care Services, issued August 1, 2008, ordering San Joaquin County to 

rescind the June 10, 2008 NOA informing plaintiff that his July 6, 2007 application for Medi-Cal 

benefits was denied. The County was ordered to approve and issue Medi-Cal benefits effective 

April, 2007 provided plaintiff was otherwise eligible. 

This court’s order of November 9, 2015 addressed the matters sought to be raised by 

 

1

 This action is before the undersigned pursuant to the parties’ consent to proceed before a 

magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

 

 

Case 2:15-cv-00158-GGH Document 31 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice, which would not change the result of that order.2 

Therefore, the request will be denied as moot. Should plaintiff seek to include any pertinent facts 

from his Request in his second amended complaint, he is free to do so. 

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: Plaintiff’s motion for judicial notice, filed 

November 12, 2015, (ECF No. 30), is denied as moot. 

Dated: November 27, 2015 

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

GGH:076/Rodriguez0158.rjn 

 

2

 Defendant’s motion to dismiss was denied in part and plaintiff was directed to file a second 

amended complaint within 28 days of that order. (ECF No. 29). 

Case 2:15-cv-00158-GGH Document 31 Filed 11/30/15 Page 2 of 2