Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-3_07-cv-00187/USCOURTS-almd-3_07-cv-00187-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

 _____________________________

MARIO JIMINEZ, #244 571 *

Petitioner, *

v. * 3:07-CV-187-MEF

 (WO)

HARVEY GRIMMER, WARDEN, et al., *

Respondents. *

 _____________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner filed this application for habeas relief on February 2, 2007. On April 9,

2007 he filed a Motion to Dismiss his petition without prejudice so that he may exhaust his

state remedies. (Doc. No. 11.) Upon review of the file in this case, the court concludes that

Petitioner's motion to dismiss is due to be granted. 

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that Petitioner’s

motion to dismiss be granted and that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice. 

It is further

ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the

Recommendation on or before April 23, 2007. Any objections filed must specifically

identify the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which a party objects.

Frivolous, conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The

parties are advised that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore,

Case 3:07-cv-00187-MEF-TFM Document 12 Filed 04/11/07 Page 1 of 2
2

it is not appealable.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the

Magistrate Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District

Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual

findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain

error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5 Cir. 1982). See Stein th

v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11 Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of th

Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11 Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the th

decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on

September 30, 1981.

Done, this 11 day of April 2007. th

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-00187-MEF-TFM Document 12 Filed 04/11/07 Page 2 of 2