Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00731/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00731-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

K.R. JOHNSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

WARDEN, CALIFORNIA STATE )

PRISON AT CORCORAN, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-00731-AWI-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 4)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

ORDER TERMINATING ACTION

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On July 20, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DISMISSED, and judgment be entered, thus terminating this action. 

These Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty

(30) days from the date of service of that order. On August 14,

2006, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

//

Case 1:06-cv-00731-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis. While Petitioner may

have other remedies in a civil rights action, the court simply

cannot provide Plaintiff with the relief he seeks in a federal

habeas corpus petition.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 20, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED;

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment; and,

4. This action is therefore TERMINATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00731-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2