Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02211/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02211-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND P. IDLEMAN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-02-2211 FCD GGH P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

The stay in this matter was lifted by order filed on June 14, 2006, adopting the

January 9, 2006, Findings and Recommendations, and this matter proceeds on the second

amended petition, filed on April 2, 2003. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner’s second amended

habeas petition within thirty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed. R. Governing §

2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to

the issues presented in the petition. See Rule 5, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases;

2. If the response to the habeas petition is an answer, petitioner’s reply, if any,

shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer;

3. If the response to the habeas petition is a motion, petitioner’s opposition or

Case 2:02-cv-02211-FCD-GGH Document 25 Filed 07/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after

service of the motion, and respondents’ reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fifteen days

thereafter.

DATED: 7/28/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

GGH:009

idle2211.rsp

Case 2:02-cv-02211-FCD-GGH Document 25 Filed 07/28/06 Page 2 of 2