Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03531/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03531-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

- 1 - 

[PROPOSED] SCHEUDLING ORDER; CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03531-MMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICES OF ABE LAMPART, P.C. 

ABE LAMPART (SBN 92406, NYS Bar #1653633) 

CHRISTINE PHAM (SBN 227033) 

456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1300 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415-274-0999 

Facsimile: 415-274-2563 

Email address: abe@lampartlaw.com 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

KAPU GEMS and KAPU GEMS LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

KAPU GEMS and KAPU GEMS LTD., 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

 

DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC. and YAIR 

YACHDAV, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03531-MMC 

[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

COMPLAINT

 

Defendants Diamond Imports, Inc. and Yair Yachdav (collectively, “Defendants”) having 

moved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiffs Kapu Gems and 

Kapu Gems Ltd. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants having noticed a hearing on their 

Motion to Dismiss for October 23, 2015, and 

Plaintiffs and Defendants having stipulated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A) and 

USDC Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), through their respective counsel, that 

because the press of business prevents counsel from being able to prepare a response to the Motion 

to Dismiss within the time required, Plaintiffs shall have an extension up to and including October 

23, 2015 to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, and Defendants shall have an extension up 

to and including October 30, 2015 to reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion to Dismiss; 

Case 3:15-cv-03531-MMC Document 27 Filed 10/02/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

[PROPOSED] SCHEUDLING ORDER; CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03531-MMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following schedule on 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is established: 

(1) Plaintiffs shall have an extension up to and including October 23, 2015 to respond to 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; 

(2) Defendants shall have an extension up to and including October 30, 2015 to reply to 

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion to Dismiss; and 

(3) A hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be held on November 13, 2015 at 

9:00 AM before this Court in Courtroom 7 of the above-entitled Court, located at 450 Golden Gate 

Avenue, 19th Floor, San Francisco, California 94102. 

 ___________________________ 

Maxine M. Chesney 

Dated: United States District Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-03531-MMC Document 27 Filed 10/02/15 Page 2 of 2