Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00696/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00696-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 690
Nature of Suit: Other Forfeiture and Penalty Suits
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Direct Marketing Associates, Corp.; John

M. Rainey, Jr., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CV-10-0696-PHX-LOA

ORDER

The Government having expressly consented in writing to magistrate-judge

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), docket # 8, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that the Government’s Motion to Approve Stipulated Final

Judgment and Order for Civil Penalties, Permanent Injunction, and Other Equitable Relief,

docket # 4, is hereby WITHDRAWN without prejudice to renewal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this lawsuit is STAYED and placed on

inactive status until Monday, October 4, 2010 (180 days) pending:

1. The Chapter 7 Trustees’ filing motion(s) under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9019(a),

seeking Bankruptcy Court approval of the Proposed Stipulated Judgment, in In re Direct

Marketing Associates, Corp., No. 2:10-bk-00910-SSC (Bankr. D. Ariz. petition filed Jan.

13, 2010), and in In re John M. Rainey, Jr., & Laurie A. Rainey, 2:10-bk-03031-GBN

(Bankr. D. Ariz. petition filed Feb. 5, 2010);

Case 2:10-cv-00696-LOA Document 9 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

2. Decision(s) by the Bankruptcy Court on the Rule 9019(a) motion(s) in

the subject Bankruptcy Cases; 

3. The Bankruptcy Trustees’ approval of the parties’ (proposed) Stipulated

Final Judgment; or 

4. Upon further order of this District Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the Rule 9019(a) motion(s) in the

Bankruptcy Court have not yet been adjudicated despite Plaintiff’s due diligence in seeking

their resolution or Plaintiff timely demonstrates a reasonable basis for continuance of this

lawsuit on inactive status, Plaintiff shall file a Status Report on or before Monday, October

4, 2010 to inform the Court what action, if any, has been undertaken in the Bankruptcy Court

and why this lawsuit should remain on inactive status without dismissal. Absent good cause

shown, Plaintiff’s failure to file a timely Status Report may result in the dismissal of this case

without prejudice. O’Donnell v. Vencor Inc., 466 F.3d. 1104 (9th Cir. 2006).

DATED this 7th day of April, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-00696-LOA Document 9 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 2