Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01633/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01633-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID PRENATT, 

Plaintiff, 2:06-cv-1633-GEB-DAD-PS

vs.

G.W. WILLIAMS CO., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action challenging actions

that took place in the state courts in 1997. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On November 6, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:06-cv-01633-GEB-DAD Document 7 Filed 12/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 6, 2007, are adopted in

full;

2. Plaintiff’s federal claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a

claim on which relief may be granted; and

3. Plaintiff’s supplemental state claims are dismissed without prejudice pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).

Dated: November 29, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01633-GEB-DAD Document 7 Filed 12/03/07 Page 2 of 2