Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02572/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02572-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

Long v. Colvin Stipulation and Proposed Order E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-02572-EFB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND 

CSBN 154575 

P.O. Box 4476 

Sunriver, OR 97707 

Telephone: 541-419-0074 

Facsimile: 541-593-4452 

Email: jaf@forslundlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LYNN ANN LONG, ) 

 ) Case No. 2:14-cv-002572-EFB 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

 ) ORDER FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S 

v. ) FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO

 ) JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) 

Acting Comm’r of Social Security, ) 

 ) 

Defendant, ) 

 ) 

____________________________________) 

 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, 

subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal 

Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT 

HUNDRED EIGHTY TWO dollars and SEVENTY NINE cents ($5,882.79). This amount represents 

compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this 

civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d). 

 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will 

consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney. The 

government’s ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are 

subject to an offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program 

pursuant to Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). After the order of EAJA fees is entered, the 

government will determine if they are subject to an offset. 

Case 2:14-cv-02572-EFB Document 25 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 2
Long v. Colvin Stipulation and Proposed Order E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-02572-EFB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not subject to an offset under Astrue v. 

Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010) and The Department of Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for 

EAJA fees and expenses shall be made payable to Jacqueline A. Forslund, based upon Plaintiff’s 

assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney. The parties agree that whether these checks are 

made payable to Plaintiff or Jacqueline A. Forslund, such checks shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s 

attorney at the following address: Jacqueline A. Forslund, Attorney at Law, P.O. Box 4476, 

Sunriver, Oregon 97707. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Date: June 17, 2016 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND 

Attorney at Law 

 /s/Jacqueline A. Forslund

 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Date: June 29, 2016 PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

 United States Attorney 

 DEBORAH STACHEL 

 Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

 Social Security Administration 

 

/s/*Henry Chi 

 HENRY CHI 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 *By email authorization 

 Attorney for Defendant 

ORDER 

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. 

DATED: July 1, 2016. ____________________________ 

 EDMUND F. BRENNAN 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

Case 2:14-cv-02572-EFB Document 25 Filed 07/01/16 Page 2 of 2