Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01377/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01377-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN D. BRYANT, 

 

Plaintiff, 

 

vs. 

 

APOTEX, INC., et al., 

 

Defendants. 

 /

Case No. 1:12-cv-01377 LJO JLT

 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On November 28, 2012, Defendants Apotex, Inc., AmeriSource Health Services Corporation,

The Harvard Drug Group LLC d/b/a Major Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Mylan

Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Mylan Institutional Inc. (“Defendants”) filed a motion for judgment on the

pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). In response, the Court vacated the hearing

set for the matter and instead issued a briefing schedule. Under the Court’s briefing schedule, Plaintiff

Kevin D. Byrant (“Plaintiff”), who is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this action, was ordered to file and

serve an opposition to the motion by no later than December 22, 2012. However, as of the date of this

order, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition or otherwise respond to the Court’s order.

Accordingly, by no later than January 15, 2012, Plaintiff shall (1) file and serve an opposition

or statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion; and (2) file and serve a written statement with 1

the Court showing cause why sanctions should not be imposed on him for failing to timely file an

opposition as ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is forewarned that the imposition of sanctions may include

the dismissal of this action. See Local Rule 230(l); Local Rule 110.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 66h44d

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

If Defendants elect to file a reply, they shall do so within seven days of being served with Plaintiff’s opposition

1

or statement of non-opposition.

Case 1:12-cv-01377-LJO-JLT Document 45 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 1