Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00881/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00881-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS E. CLEARY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

JEFF WRIGLEY, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-00881-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 9)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 7)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AS MOOT

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On December 4, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED, the

instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED as MOOT,

and the Clerk of Court be directed to enter judgment in favor of

Respondent. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. To

date, the parties have not filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

Case 1:06-cv-00881-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 01/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 4, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, filed October 13, 2006,

is GRANTED;

3. The instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DISMISSED as MOOT; and,

4. The Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00881-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 01/30/07 Page 2 of 2