Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_24-cv-01086/USCOURTS-azd-2_24-cv-01086-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Barbara Joyce Mays-Monroe, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

Centurion of Arizona LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-24-01086-PHX-KML (CDB)

ORDER 

Plaintiffs seek review of an order by Magistrate Judge Bibles denying their motion 

to compel. (Doc. 37.) According to plaintiffs, the testimony they seek in their motion to 

compel would cover “the specifics of care provided to Mr. Mack, whether documented in 

the medical record or documented elsewhere, such as in patient visit scheduling, pharmacy 

notes, or medical record alerts that are not incorporated in the printed medical record.” 

(Doc. 37 at 6.) Plaintiffs represent they are not seeking testimony “how or whether policies 

were complied with.” (Doc. 37 at 6.) To ensure the court has a complete understanding of

the underlying facts and the parties’ positions, defendants must file a supplemental 

statement answering the following:

1) Was Mr. Mack provided any care that is not reflected in his medical records? In 

other words, if a 30(b)(6) deposition were allowed, would that deponent provide any 

information regarding care provided to Mr. Mack beyond what is contained in Mr. 

Mack’s medical records?

2) Was Dr. Orm involved in Mr. Mack’s care as a supervisor or other role similar to 

Case 2:24-cv-01086-KML-CDB Document 50 Filed 01/14/25 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

her role in the cases cited at Doc. 46, page 9, lines 17-23? 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED no later than January 21, 2025, defendants shall file a statement 

of no more than two pages answering the questions above. Plaintiffs may file a response 

of no more than two pages no later than January 23, 2025.

Dated this 14th day of January, 2025.

Case 2:24-cv-01086-KML-CDB Document 50 Filed 01/14/25 Page 2 of 2