Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02644/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02644-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE VIZCAINO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2644 MCE KJM PS

vs.

UNITED STATES DEP’T OF INTERIOR, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed January 11, 2006, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-02644-MCE -KJM Document 4 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 1, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/vizc2644.fta

Case 2:05-cv-02644-MCE -KJM Document 4 Filed 05/02/06 Page 2 of 2