Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01417/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01417-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGER WILKERSON,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:14-cv-01417-LJO-EPG-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION 

BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR 

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON 

WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED

(ECF No. 22.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN THIRTY 

DAYS

Roger Wilkerson (“Plaintiff@) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this 

action on July 26, 2013. (ECF No. 1.) On January 30, 2014, Plaintiff filed the First Amended 

Complaint. (ECF No. 22.)

On October 1, 2015, the Court dismissed Plaintiff=s First Amended Complaint for 

failure to state a claim, with leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty days. 

(ECF No. 51.) 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A; 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e). To date, Plaintiff has not complied 

with or otherwise responded to the Court=s order.1 As a result, there is no pleading on file 

which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. 

 

1 On October 29, 2015, the U.S. Postmaster returned the court’s order to the court as undeliverable, with 

the notation “Attempted – Not Known.” (Court Record.) Plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in his 

address. Absent such notice, service at a party=s prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 182(f).

Case 1:14-cv-01417-LJO-EPG Document 53 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A 

and 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e), this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff=s failure 

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section 1983, and that this dismissal be 

subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). Coleman v. Tollefson, 

135 S.Ct. 1759, 1761-62, 191 L.Ed.2d 803 (2011).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(l). Within thirty 

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate 

Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 

772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 

1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2015 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01417-LJO-EPG Document 53 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 2