Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03119/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03119-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 690
Nature of Suit: Other Forfeiture and Penalty Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

APPROXIMATELY $2,822,224.75 IN

FUNDS SEIZED FROM EIGHT BANK

ACCOUNTS, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-09-3119 WHA (EMC)

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S LETTER OF

MAY 19, 2010

(Docket No. 68)

On May 19, 2010, the United States filed a discovery letter in which it asked for relief from

the Court based on Inc21’s failure to provide full and complete responses to one document request

and two interrogatories. A hearing was held on the discovery dispute on June 2, 2010. This order

memorializes the rulings made by the Court at the hearing.

(1) Inc21 shall provide full and complete responses to Interrogatories Nos. 4 and 7. The

responses shall be verified, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(b)(5). In addition, the

responses shall be provided in the narrative; that is, Inc21 may not simply refer to documents in lieu

of providing substantive responses because it has failed to show that the burden of deriving or

ascertaining the answers to the interrogatories would be substantially the same for either party. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(d).

///

///

///

Case 3:09-cv-03119-WHA Document 76 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

(2) Inc21 shall provide a declaration, certifying that it has produced all documents in its

possession, custody, or control that are responsive to Request for Production No. 1. 

This order disposes of Docket No. 68.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 4, 2010

_________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-03119-WHA Document 76 Filed 06/04/10 Page 2 of 2