Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00606/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00606-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DON ROSE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

SAMUEL ABRAHAM, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

)

 )

1:08-CV-00606-AWI-SMS

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

AMENDED PROOFS OF SERVICE (DOCS.

33 through 35)

INFORMATIONAL ORDER TO PLAINTIFF 

Plaintiff is proceeding with a civil action in this Court.

The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302(c)(1) and 72-303.

Pending before the Court are the ex parte applications of

Plaintiff, filed on July 31, 2008, for 1) expedited discovery to

occur before the conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 26(f) with

respect to Defendants Steven Duce and Bella Robles Corporation,

filed on July 31, 2008; and 2) an order requiring that the

Marshal serve the summons and complaint on Defendant Samuel J.

Abraham pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). Plaintiff also filed

a declaration of Leonard C. Herr, Plaintiff’s counsel, in support

of the application for the service order.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) requires that any paper after the

Case 1:08-cv-00606-AWI -JLT Document 38 Filed 08/11/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

complaint that is required to be served must be filed, together

with a certificate of service, within a reasonable time after

service. Local Rule 5-135(c) expressly requires that except for

ex parte matters, a paper document shall not be submitted for

filing unless it is accompanied by a proof of service. Further,

it expressly requires that proof of service shall be under

penalty of perjury. However, the proofs of service submitted by

Plaintiff with respect to the applications or motions and

declarations in support thereof do not contain declarations under

penalty of perjury. Accordingly, legally sufficient proof of

service of the pertinent papers is lacking.

Accordingly, Plaintiff IS DIRECTED to submit to the Court no

later than five court days after the date of service of this

order amended proofs of service made under penalty of perjury

with respect to the applications and all related papers that have

been filed. 

Plaintiff IS INFORMED that a failure to comply with this

order will result in denial of Plaintiff’s motions for failure to

establish proof of service.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 10, 2008 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00606-AWI -JLT Document 38 Filed 08/11/08 Page 2 of 2