Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00812/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00812-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK L. SIMMONS, SR. )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

ROBERT SYDNEY JULIAN, M.D., et)

al., )

Defendants. )

)

 )

1: 05-CV-00812-OWW-SMS

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION

WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF

MAY BE GRANTED (DOCS. 10, 15) 

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an

action for damages concerning alleged medical malpractice and

related tortious conduct. 

On August 16, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and

a recommendation that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint

without leave to amend because it failed to state a claim.

Plaintiff was granted thirty days within which to file

objections. The findings and recommendation were served on all

parties on August 16, 2005.

On September 16, 2005, Plaintiff filed timely objections to

the findings and recommendations. The undersigned has considered

the objections and has determined there is no need to modify the

Case 1:05-cv-00812-OWW -SMS Document 19 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

findings and recommendations based on the points raised in the

objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the findings and recommendation are

supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 16, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The action IS DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted; and

3. The Clerk of Court IS DIRECTED to close this action

because this order terminates the action in its entirety. IT IS SO

ORDERED.

Emm0d6Dated: September 26, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00812-OWW -SMS Document 19 Filed 09/28/05 Page 2 of 2