Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00540/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00540-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1986 Neglect of Duty

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL WELDON,

Plaintiff,

v.

JERRY DYER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-00540-LJO-SAB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

ECF NO. 12

On June 26, 2013, the magistrate judge issued a Findings and Recommendations 

recommending that certain claims be dismissed from Plaintiff Paul Weldon’s (“Plaintiff”) 

Second Amended Complaint and that this action proceed solely on the claims found to be 

cognizable. (ECF No. 12.) The Findings and Recommendations included notice that any 

objections must be filed within thirty (30) days.

On July 8, 2013, Plaintiff filed a statement indicating that he has no objections to the 

Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 13.) No other party has made an appearance in this 

action.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

/ / /

Case 1:13-cv-00540-LJO-SAB Document 14 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations dated June 26, 2013 are ADOPTED IN 

FULL (ECF No. 12);

2. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Jerry Dyer and Plaintiff’s claims under 42 

U.S.C. § 1986 are DISMISSED, without leave to amend; and

3. This action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Conlee, Econo 

Towing and John Doe #1-3 under the Fourth Amendment (excessive force, 

unreasonable search and unreasonable seizure) and under the Fourteenth 

Amendment (failure to provide sufficient notice regarding the seizure of 

Plaintiff’s vehicle).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 9, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

66h44d

Case 1:13-cv-00540-LJO-SAB Document 14 Filed 07/09/13 Page 2 of 2