Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01523/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01523-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS ESPINO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1523 DFL KJM PS

vs.

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned based on Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Calendared for hearing on October 11, 2006 is defendants’ motion to dismiss. No opposition to

the motion has been filed. 

Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party

will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to

the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may

be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.”

Case 2:06-cv-01523-RRB -KJM Document 16 Filed 10/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of October 11, 2006 is vacated. Hearing on defendants’

motion is continued to November 15, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion no later than October 25,

2006. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of nonopposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: October 6, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

espino.con

Case 2:06-cv-01523-RRB -KJM Document 16 Filed 10/06/06 Page 2 of 2