Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01844/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01844-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT ELMER BARBER,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1844 MCE EFB P

vs.

WARDEN OF THE SUBSTANCE 

ABUSE TREATMENT FACILITY,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28

U.S.C. § 2254. On December 7, 2010, this court issued findings and recommendations which

recommended that petitioner’s motion for stay and abeyance be denied. On December 17, 2010,

petitioner requested an extension of time to file objections to the December 7, 2010, findings and

recommendations. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). Good cause appearing, that request will be granted.

On December 13, 2010, petitioner filed a document entitled “Motion to Correct the Name

of Respondent Judge. Also, to Establish the Cal. Supreme Court’s File Date and Case Number

for Prior Motion Before this Hon. Court” (hereinafter “Motion to Correct”). It is not clear to this

court what relief petitioner is requesting by this motion. However, attached to the motion is the

first page of a document entitled “Motion for a Ruling on Petitioner’s Prior Motion for a Stay

and Abeyance.” This document is directed to the United States District Court for the Eastern

Case 2:04-cv-01844-MCE -EFB Document 53 Filed 01/04/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

District of California but does not contain a file stamp. Also attached to the motion is the first

page of a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in the California Supreme Court on November

24, 2010. This court will construe petitioner’s “Motion to Correct” as a request that the court

consider the documents attached to the motion in connection with petitioner’s objections to the

December 7, 2010 findings and recommendations. So construed, petitioner’s “Motion to

Correct” will be granted. 

Accordingly, good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s December 17, 2010, request for an extension of time is granted and

petitioner has 30 days from the date this order is served to file objections to the findings and

recommendations; and

2. Petitioner’s “Motion to Correct” (Dckt. No. 51) is granted.

DATED: January 4, 2011.

Case 2:04-cv-01844-MCE -EFB Document 53 Filed 01/04/11 Page 2 of 2