Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07500/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07500-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7500

DAVID E. HILL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HARVIE WILKINSON, Chief Judge; PAUL V. NIEMEYER, U.S. 

Circuit Judge; MICHAEL, U.S. Circuit Judge; WIDENER, U.S. 

Circuit Judge; DIANA G. MOTZ, U.S. Circuit Judge; ROBERT B. 

KING, U.S. Circuit Judge; DENNIS W. SHEDD, U.S. Circuit 

Judge; T. S. ELLIS, III, U.S. District Judge; CLAUDE M. 

HILTON, U.S. District Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:13-cv-00127-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted: February 18, 2015 Decided: February 24, 2015

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David E. Hill, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7500 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/24/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

David E. Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing 

his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of 

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), action without prejudice, and 

the court’s subsequent order denying Hill’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 

59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment and to amend his 

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. See Hill v. Wilkinson, No. 2:13-cv-00127-RAJDEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2014 & Sept. 22, 2014). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-7500 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/24/2015 Pg: 2 of 2