Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-02475/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-02475-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO EXCHANGE PROPOSED TERMS FOR CONSTRUCTION

CASE NO. CV 12-CV-2475 JSW 1

sf-3229941 

RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421)

RKrevans@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

RUDY Y. KIM (CA SBN 199426) 

RudyKim@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 

Telephone: 650.813.5600 

Facsimile: 650.494.0792 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INVENSENSE, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INVENSENSE, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. CV 12-CV-2475 JSW

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

EXTEND TIME TO EXCHANGE 

PROPOSED TERMS FOR 

CONSTRUCTION 

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff STMicroelectronics, Inc., (“ST”) 

and Defendant InvenSense, Inc., (“InvenSense”) (collectively, “Parties”), through their 

respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request an order extending the due 

date for the Parties’ Patent L.R. 4-1 Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction from 

December 17, 2012 to December 21, 2012. This extension of time will provide the 

Parties the time necessary to prepare and complete the Proposed Terms for Construction. 

The requested time modification would change no other due dates and would have no 

Case 3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document 61 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 3 Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document60 Filed12/14/12 Page1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO EXCHANGE PROPOSED TERMS FOR CONSTRUCTION

CASE NO. CV 12-CV-2475 JSW 2

sf-3229941 

effect on the remaining schedule for the case. Accordingly, ST and InvenSense hereby 

stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows: 

WHEREAS, on or about May 24, 2012, the Parties stipulated to an extension of 

time for InvenSense to respond to the Complaint; and 

WHEREAS, on or about July 27, 2012, the Parties stipulated to an extension of 

time for ST to respond to the InvenSense’s Counterclaims; and 

WHEREAS, on or about July 31, 2012, the Court ordered a continuance of the 

Case Management Conference; and 

WHEREAS, on or about October 12, 2012, the Court granted an order to shorten 

time for hearing; and 

WHEREAS, on or about October 22, 2012, the Court ordered an extension of 

time to respond to the Parties’ L.R. 3-2 Document Productions Accompanying Disclosure 

of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions; and 

WHEREAS, on or about December 4, 2012, the Court ordered an extension of 

time to respond to the Parties’ L.R. 3-4 Document Productions Accompanying Disclosure 

of Invalidity Contentions and Patent L.R. 3-3 Invalidity Contentions; and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Case Management Order entered September 

14, 2012, and pursuant to the Patent Local Rules, the current due date for the Parties’ 

Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction is December 17, 2012; and 

WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time to prepare their Exchange of 

Proposed Terms for Construction, and ST and InvenSense, through their respective 

counsel of record, have agreed to extend the due date for the Exchange of Proposed 

Terms for Construction from December 17, 2012 to December 21, 2012; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties hereto that the Parties shall 

have to and including December 21, 2012, to exchange their Proposed Terms for Construction. 

Case 3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document 61 Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 3 Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document60 Filed12/14/12 Page2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO EXCHANGE PROPOSED TERMS FOR CONSTRUCTION

CASE NO. CV 12-CV-2475 JSW 3

sf-3229941 

Dated: December 14, 2012 RACHEL KREVANS 

RUDY Y. KIM 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Rudy Y. Kim 

RUDY Y. KIM 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INVENSENSE, INC. 

Dated: December 14, 2012 CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN 

SEAN PAK 

MICHELLE A. CLARK 

LANCE YANG 

MICHAEL POWELL 

SUONG T. NGUYEN 

THOMAS D. PEASE 

CARLOS A. RODRIGUEZ 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

By: /s/ Michael Powell 

MICHAEL POWELL 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. 

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE 

I, Rudy Y. Kim, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

STIPULATION TO EXCHANGE PROPOSED TERMS FOR CONSTRUCTION. In 

compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael Powell has concurred in this 

filing. 

Dated: December 14, 2012 By: /s/ Rudy Y. Kim 

 RUDY Y. KIM 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ By: ________________________________ 

 The Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document60 Filed12/14/12 Page3 of 3

January 2, 2013

Case 3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document 61 Filed 01/02/13 Page 3 of 3