Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-02102/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-02102-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CCSAC, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PACIFIC BANKING CORP, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-02102-JD 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Re: Dkt. No. 14

The Court granted an ex parte temporary restraining order in favor of plaintiffs CCSAC, 

Inc. and CANN Distributors, Inc. and against defendants Pacific Banking Corp. (“PBC”), Justin 

Costello and GRN Funds, LLC. Dkt. No. 13 (“TRO”). As directed by the TRO order, plaintiffs 

have filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. Dkt. No. 14. They have established reasonable 

efforts at service, including what appears to have been successful email service on some 

defendants, but no defendant has appeared in the case or opposed the motion. For the reasons 

discussed in the TRO order, the Court grants an injunction on exactly the same terms, intended 

solely to preserve the status quo pendente lite. 

Upon receiving actual notice of this order by personal service or otherwise, defendants and 

their officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and any other persons in active concert or 

participation with them, are prohibited and enjoined from:

1. Using, drawing down, transferring or in any way reducing the funds deposited with 

PBC by CCSAC, Inc. or CANN Distributors, Inc. without their express consent; and

2. Deleting, destroying, editing, or in any way altering any records relating to plaintiffs’ 

deposits, including without limitation all transaction and deposit balance records.

Case 3:20-cv-02102-JD Document 23 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Given the nature of the case and the relief ordered, a bond need not be posted under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c). See Jorgensen v. Cassiday, 320 F.3d 906, 919-20 (9th Cir. 

2003); Barahona-Gomez v. Reno, 167 F.3d 1228, 1237 (9th Cir. 1999).

Plaintiffs are directed to attempt personal and corporate service, and email service, of this

order to all known addresses for defendants. Defendants may ask for reconsideration of the 

injunction for good cause if and when they appear in the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 24, 2020

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:20-cv-02102-JD Document 23 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 2