Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05641/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05641-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OMAR KAHLIFE KING, CASE NO. CV-F-04-5641 AWI DLB HC

Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT 

TO FILE ANSWER TO AMENDED 

vs. PETITION 

SCOTT KERNAN, Warden, [Doc. 12]

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus on April 29, 2004. Petitioner filed

a first amended petition on November 1, 2004. By order of December 14, 2004, the Court directed

Respondent to file a responsive pleading to the amended petition. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss

on February 9, 2005. On March 14, 2005, Petitioner filed a motion to withdraw the unexhausted claims.

On March 22, 2005, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that

Petitioner’s request to withdraw the unexhausted claims be granted and Respondent’s motion to dismiss

be denied as moot. The recommendation was adopted on May 24, 2005, and a second amended petition

was filed by the Court on May 26, 2005. Accordingly, this claim is now proceeding on the second

amended petition.

////

Case 1:04-cv-05641-AWI-DLB Document 14 Filed 06/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent file a further response to the petition within sixty (60) days from the date of

service of this order; 

2. Petitioner shall file a traverse within thirty (30) days from the date Respondent files its

answer; and

3. All provisions of the Court’s December 14, 2004, order directing Respondent to file a

response remain in full force and effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 10, 2005 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05641-AWI-DLB Document 14 Filed 06/10/05 Page 2 of 2