Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-00953/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-00953-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ralph G. Duran, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Maricopa County Board of 

Supervisors, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-0953-PHX-SRB (ECV)

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Enlargement of Time (Doc. #28) in which to respond

to Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #24) and to

Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #23). Defendants have filed a

Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement (Doc. #30) in which they oppose the motion.

The motion to strike has already been granted in an order (Doc. #26) dated February

14, 2006 and therefore an extension of time to respond would be futile. Regarding the

motion to dismiss, after Defendants filed their reply, the reference to the magistrate judge

was withdrawn and the motion is now pending before Judge Susan R. Bolton. The rules of

procedure do not provide for a sur-reply, see LRCiv 7.2(c, d), and Plaintiff has presented no

basis for the court to order one here. For these reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement

of Time will be denied.

///

///

Case 2:05-cv-00953-SRB-ECV Document 31 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time (Doc. #28) is denied. 

DATED this 17th day of February, 2006.

 

Case 2:05-cv-00953-SRB-ECV Document 31 Filed 02/21/06 Page 2 of 2