Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00847/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00847-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1319 Clean Water Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION STAYING DISCOVERY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

SEAN K. HUNGERFORD, SBN 200268 

ADAM K. GUERNSEY, SBN 282105 

HARRISON, TEMBLADOR, 

HUNGERFORD & JOHNSON LLP 

980 9th Street, Suite 1400 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 382-4377 

Facsimile: (916) 382-4380 

E-mail: shungerford@hthjlaw.com 

 aguernsey@hthjlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA SPORTSFISHING 

PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC., a corporation, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________

CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00847-JAM-EFB

STIPULATION STAYING 

DISCOVERY AND ORDER 

Complaint filed: 4-30-2013 

Case 2:13-cv-00847-JAM-EFB Document 22 Filed 03/27/14 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

STIPULATION STAYING DISCOVERY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

On March 19, 2014, Defendant MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC., (“MCM”) filed a Motion 

for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, on Plaintiff’s Claims I-VI 

(“Motion for Summary Judgment”). The date of the hearing on the Motion for Summary 

Judgment is calendared for Wednesday, May 7, 2014. Previously, on March 19, 2014, MCM 

filed a Motion for Protective Order seeking to stay all Discovery pending the resolution of the 

Motion for Summary Judgment. 

Counsel for MCM and Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION 

ALLIANCE (“CSPA”) have met and conferred regarding MCM’s Motion for Protective Order, 

and have agreed to stay all Discovery pending the Court’s ruling on MCM’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment. This agreement has rendered MCM’s Motion for Protective Order moot. 

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED by the parties to this action, by and 

through their respective counsel, that: 

All Discovery is stayed in this matter pending the Court’s ruling on MCM’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment. Further, MCM’s Motion for Protective Order shall be removed from the 

calendar as moot. Should the Court’s ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment eliminate the 

need for further Discovery, CSPA’s requests for Discovery shall be rendered moot. Should the 

Court’s ruling not eliminate the need for further discovery, MCM shall respond to CSPA’s 

current Discovery requests within 21 days of the Court’s ruling and order. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

Case 2:13-cv-00847-JAM-EFB Document 22 Filed 03/27/14 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

______________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION STAYING DISCOVERY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

2

Dated: March 25, 2014 HARRISON, TEMBLADOR, 

 HUNGERFORD & JOHNSON LLP 

 /s/ Adam K. Guernsey, Esq. 

 _______________________________ 

 ADAM K. GUERNSEY, ESQ. 

Attorney for Defendant 

MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC. 

Dated: March 25, 2014 LOZEAU DRURY LLP 

 

 /s/ Douglas J. Chermak, Esq. (as authorized 

 on 3/25/14) 

 _______________________________ 

 DOUGLAS CHERMAK, ESQ. 

Attorney for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA 

SPORTSFISHING PROTECTION 

ALLIANCE 

ORDER

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 26, 2014 

 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ 

 Honorable John A. Mendez 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:13-cv-00847-JAM-EFB Document 22 Filed 03/27/14 Page 3 of 3