Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02135/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02135-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY L. STOUT, No. CIV.S-05-2135 FCD DAD PS

Plaintiff,

v. 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

JOSEPH GAMA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma

pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The matter was referred to a

United States Magistrate Judge by Local Rule 72-302(c)(21) pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

By order filed October 24, 2005, plaintiff’s complaint was

dismissed and twenty days leave to amend was granted. On December 6,

2005, the order was re-served on plaintiff at both the address listed

on his most recent correspondence to the court and the address listed

on his complaint. The time period has now expired, and plaintiff has

/////

Case 2:05-cv-02135-FCD-DAD Document 8 Filed 02/13/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s

order. 

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copies of

the order sent to both addresses were returned as “undeliverable,”

plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility

to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record

address of the party is fully effective.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See L.R. 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to serve a copy of

these findings and recommendations on plaintiff at 501 Glendale

Street, Suite 4, Park Hills, MO 63601 and 1502 N. Washington Street,

Suite 16, Farmington, MO 63640.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the

United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being

served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be

captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-02135-FCD-DAD Document 8 Filed 02/13/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.

1991).

DATED: February 13, 2006.

DAD:lg

ddad1/orders.prose/stout2135.fta

Case 2:05-cv-02135-FCD-DAD Document 8 Filed 02/13/06 Page 3 of 3