Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01918/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01918-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PACIFIC INFORMATION RESOURCES,

INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MARK MUSSELMAN,

Defendant /

No. C-07-1918 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On October 3, 2007, plaintiff Pacific Information Resources, Inc. electronically filed

three documents: (1) “Request for Judicial Notice,” to which three exhibits are attached; (2)

“Declaration of Timothy J. Koster,” to which six exhibits are attached; and (3) “Expert

Declaration of Ran Libesking Hadas, Ph.D.,” to which one exhibit is attached. Plaintiff has

violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to

the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers

are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically

. . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number,

and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing

Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

Case 3:07-cv-01918-MMC Document 26 Filed 10/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

documents. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the Court’s

Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court

may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 22, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-01918-MMC Document 26 Filed 10/22/07 Page 2 of 2