Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01368/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01368-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAMA JAY GALLON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1368 DFL DAD P

vs.

GEORGE GALAZA, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

The parties were granted twenty days to file and serve objections to the findings

and recommendations filed in this case on April 17, 2006. Petitioner immediately filed a motion

for a lengthy extension of time. By order filed May 4, 2006, petitioner was ordered to deliver his

objections to prison officials for mailing to the court and respondents’ counsel on or before June

14, 2006. Petitioner was advised that “[n]o further extension of time will be granted for this

purpose.” On June 16, 2006, the court received petitioner’s objections with an incomplete proof

of service dated June 13, 2006. Despite the court’s order foreclosing an extension of time

beyond June 14, 2006, petitioner now seeks sixty days in which to file additional objections.

Petitioner’s time for filing objections closed on June 14, 2006. Petitioner’s

request, construed as a request to reopen the time for filing objections, fails to show good cause

for further delaying the district judge’s consideration of a motion filed by respondents more than

Case 2:05-cv-01368-DFL-DAD Document 33 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

six months ago. Petitioner has not cited any deficiency in the objections previously filed, has not

suggested any additional objections he would raise if granted the lengthy extension of time he

seeks, and has not described any circumstances that are unusual. In the absence of a showing of

good cause to reopen the time for filing objections, petitioner’s request will be denied. The

findings and recommendations filed April 17, 2006, and the objections filed June 16, 2006, are

now submitted to the district judge for a ruling on respondents’ motion to dismiss.

Petitioner’s request for a copy of his objections is denied. A party who wants a

copy of a document for his own records must make the copy before submitting the document to

the court for filing. Copies of documents that have been filed may be obtained by purchasing

them through a copy service. If petitioner wishes to purchase a copy of his objections, he may

obtain the address of a copy service from the Clerk of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s June 16, 2006 request for a copy of his objections is denied; and

2. Petitioner’s June 22, 2006 request for extension of time, construed as a request

to reopen the time for filing objections, is denied.

DATED: July 7, 2006.

DAD:13

gall1368.111den

Case 2:05-cv-01368-DFL-DAD Document 33 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2