Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01305/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01305-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD WILSON,

Petitioner,

v.

D. SMITH,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 06-1305 OWW DLB HC

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF

PETITIONER AND CLOSE FILE

[Docs. 8, 9]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On October 23, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations

recommending that the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus be granted. On January 19,

2007, the Findings and Recommendations were adopted in full and Respondent was directed

consider the appropriateness of transferring Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set forth

in 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed appropriate by the BOP, without

reference to the BOP policy promulgated in December 2002 and without reference to the BOP’s

February 14, 2005, amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. Respondent was directed to make this

determination within six (6) months from the date of service of that order. (Court Doc. 8.) 

On May 24, 2007, Respondent filed a notice of verification of compliance with the

Court’s January 19, 2007, order. (Court Doc. 9.) Respondent submits a form entitled

“Institutional Referral for CCC Placement,” dated May 16, 2007, which indicates that Petitioner

Case 1:06-cv-01305-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 06/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

was evaluated “without reference to the time constraints imposed by 28 C.F.R. § 570.20-21 or

the 2002 and 2005 Community Corrections Policies.” Attachment 1, Court Doc. 9. As a result

of this evaluation, it was recommended that Petitioner spend 150-180 days in an RRC prior to his

release. 

Because Petitioner has been evaluated in compliance with the Court’s January 19, 2007,

the action shall be terminated. Thus, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter

judgment in favor of Petitioner, and CLOSE the file.IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 5, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01305-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 06/05/07 Page 2 of 2