Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01099/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01099-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1 Also, in the document filed on April 27, 2005, plaintiff

asks, for the second time, that the court overrule the magistrate

judge’s decision to limit plaintiff’s second amended complaint to

twenty pages. The court will not revisit the April 4, 2005

decision affirming the page limitation imposed by the magistrate

judge.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL MAGNAN,

Plaintiff, 2:03-cv-1099-GEB-KJM-P

vs.

DAVID RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On April 7, 2005, the Magistrate Judge assigned to this

case issued an order denying a motion for consolidation of this

action with CIV-S-03-0732 MCE GGH P. On April 27, 2005,

plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order.1

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s

orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to

law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it

Case 2:03-cv-01099-GEB -CKD Document 38 Filed 10/11/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s

April 27, 2005 request for reconsideration is denied.

Dated: October 7, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01099-GEB -CKD Document 38 Filed 10/11/05 Page 2 of 2