Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-3_06-cv-03002/USCOURTS-arwd-3_06-cv-03002-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HARRISON DIVISION

ROBERT D. JOHNSTON and

MELANIE K. JOHNSTON PLAINTIFFS

V. 06-CV-03002

JASON BRISCO, et. al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Currently before the Court is the Motion to Quash

Deposition of Sheriff Danny Hickman (Doc. 135) filed by the

Boone County Defendants on November 27, 2006. On November 13,

2006, Plaintiffs faxed a letter and pleading to counsel for the

Boone County Defendants noticing Sheriff Hickman for a

deposition on Friday, December 8, 2006. Sheriff Hickman is

scheduled to be out of town on that date, however, states that

he can be made available for a deposition on another date agreed

to by the parties. Further, the Boone County Defendants contend

the deposition notice should be quashed as it is not in

compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Court being well and sufficiently advised, finds that

the motion (Doc. 135) is GRANTED and the deposition notice is

quashed. Plaintiffs and counsel for Sheriff Hickman are advised

to consult with each other to determine an agreed upon date for

Sheriff Hickman’s deposition. However, Plaintiffs are further

advised that any deposition notice and/or subpoena must be in

compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Case 3:06-cv-03002-RTD Document 139 Filed 11/28/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28 day of November 2006. th

/S/Robert T. Dawson

Honorable Robert T. Dawson

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-03002-RTD Document 139 Filed 11/28/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>