Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01428/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01428-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES T. DICKERSON, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1428 LKK KJM P

vs.

JIM POPE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed August 23, 2005 plaintiff was ordered to file a certified copy of

his inmate trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of

the complaint within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed a certified copy of his inmate

trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the

complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

Case 2:05-cv-01428-LKK -KJM Document 9 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 25, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/kf

dick1428.fifp

Case 2:05-cv-01428-LKK -KJM Document 9 Filed 10/26/05 Page 2 of 2