Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00874/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00874-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

C. WALLACE COPPOCK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RUSSELL GREEN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-00874-SI 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION AND

DISMISSING ACTION

Re: Dkt. No. 27

On April 19, 2019, Magistrate Judge Corley issued a screening order concluding plaintiffs’ 

complaint failed Section 1915 review. (Dkt. No. 25.) Judge Corley granted plaintiffs leave to file 

an amended complaint by May 3, 2019; plaintiffs did not do so and did not otherwise contact the 

Court. Because all parties have not appeared and consented to magistrate jurisdiction, this action 

was reassigned to the undersigned district court judge on May 8, 2019. See Williams v. King, 875 

F.3d 500, 504 (9th Cir. 2017) (holding that magistrate jurisdiction “cannot vest until the court has 

received consent from all parties to an action.”). That same day Judge Corley also issued a Report 

and Recommendation for the district judge to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a plausible 

claim for relief. Dkt. No. 27. The parties were given 14 days fourteen days from the date they were 

served with Judge Corley’s Report and Recommendation to file objections and were told that failure 

to file an objection may waive the right to review the issue in the district court. No objections have 

been filed. 

Case 3:19-cv-00874-SI Document 29 Filed 06/05/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

This Court has reviewed de novo the complaint, Judge Corley’s Section 1915 Initial 

Screening of Complaint order, and the Report and Recommendation to Dismiss. This Court agrees 

with that analysis, and finds that the complaint fails to state a plausible claim for relief.. 

Accordingly, this Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES this 

case without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 5, 2019

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:19-cv-00874-SI Document 29 Filed 06/05/19 Page 2 of 2