Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00225/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00225-49/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff William Atcherley (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 

in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s Third 

Amended Complaint, filed on January 26, 2015, for violation of the Eighth Amendment and 

negligence against numerous Defendants. 

The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Abadia, Holt, Borbolla, Ceballos, Rios, 

Torres, Ross and Clark is pending.

On April 27, 2015, Plaintiff filed his opposition to the motion, as well as his response to 

Defendants’ statement of undisputed facts. He also filed evidentiary objections, a statement of 

disputed facts, two declarations, a request for judicial notice and a “Separate Statement of Facts in 

WILBUR ATCHERLEY,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12cv00225 LJO DLB (PC)

ORDER GRANTING DEEFENDANTS’ REQUEST 

TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE 

STATEMENT OF FACTS

(Document 261-3)

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE 

STATEMENT OF FACTS

(Document 246) 

Case 1:12-cv-00225-LJO-DLB Document 278 Filed 06/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Support of his Opposition.” Combined, these documents presented hundreds of pages of briefing and 

exhibits.

On May 19, 2015, as part of their reply, Defendants moved to strike Plaintiff’s “Separate 

Statement of Facts” as an impermissible filing under Local Rule 260(b).

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s filing and finds that it is an unauthorized filing under Local 

Rule 260(b). The briefing contains a mix of arguments and “facts” already presented in his 

opposition.

Accordingly, Defendants’ request to strike is GRANTED and Document 246 is STRICKEN 

from the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 16, 2015 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00225-LJO-DLB Document 278 Filed 06/16/15 Page 2 of 2