Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00943/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00943-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Nestor D. Murillo-Flores, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Michael B. Mukasey, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-0943-PHX-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

(“Petition”) (Doc. #2) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Magistrate Judge issued a

Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. #30) recommending that the Petition be denied.

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts

the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not

required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”

(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en

banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s

findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis

in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.

#30) is ACCEPTED;

Case 2:08-cv-00943-JAT Document 31 Filed 02/06/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus (Doc. #2) is DENIED; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE in the event the circumstances surrounding Petitioner’s detention change.

DATED this 5th day of February, 2009.

Case 2:08-cv-00943-JAT Document 31 Filed 02/06/09 Page 2 of 2