Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01193/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01193-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RPOST INTERNATIONAL LTD., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

AUTHENTIX – AUTHENTICATION

TECHNOLOGIES LTD., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-06-1193 MMC

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ORDER

VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

(Docket No. 29)

Before the Court is plaintiffs’ administrative motion, filed June 23, 2006, seeking an

order vacating the June 30, 2006 case management conference. Plaintiffs state therein

they have not yet served the only remaining defendant, Authentix-Authentication

Technologies, Ltd. (“Authentix”), and that they are uncertain how long it will take to effect

service on Authentix pursuant to the Hague Convention. 

Plaintiffs have shown good cause for continuing, but not vacating, the case

management conference.

Accordingly, the June 30, 2006 case management conference is hereby

CONTINUED to September 1, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. A joint case management statement 

/ /

Case 3:06-cv-01193-MMC Document 31 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

shall be filed no later than August 25, 2006.

This order terminates Docket No. 29.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 23, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01193-MMC Document 31 Filed 06/23/06 Page 2 of 2