Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OKI AMERICA, INC. et al.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

and related counterclaims

___________________________________/

No. C 04-03171 CRB

ORDER

Submitted to the Court for decision is OKI’s motion to strike the supplemental expert

report of Alan Ratliff (Docket no. 309). On Friday, September 8, 2006, AMD moved to

supplement its opposition to OKI’s motion to strike (Docket no. 383). That same day OKI

moved to strike the newest supplemental report of Alan Ratliffe (Docket no. 386) and for an

order shortening time for that motion to be heard (Docket no. 389). OKI has also filed a

motion to strike the supplemental infringement contentions of Dr. Bruce Smith (Docket no.

366) and AMD has moved to file intrinsic evidence (Docket no. 378).

AMD’s motion to file intrinsic evidence, namely excerpts from the prosecution

history, is GRANTED. At oral argument on the motions for summary judgment OKI asked

for and received permission to file the entire prosecution history. OKI shall make the filing 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 396 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2004\3171\orderresupp.wpd 2

on or before September 13, 2006.

AMD’s motion to supplement its opposition is GRANTED.

OKI’s motion to shorten time is GRANTED. The Court will decide OKI’s motions to

strike the supplemental and second supplemental reports of Alan Ratliff, as well as the

motion to strike the supplemental infringement contentions of Dr. Bruce Smith, on the papers

and without oral argument. AMD shall file all of its oppositions to the above motions (to the

extent they have not already been filed) on or before September 15, 2006. OKI’s replies, if

any, shall be filed on or before September 22, 2006. The Court will take the motions under

submission at that time. In the meantime, no party may serve any additional expert

supplemental discovery without first obtaining leave of the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2006

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 396 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2