Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01997/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01997-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 00:0000 Cause Code Unknown

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The court notes that the January 27, 2009 findings and recommendations, and the

March 19, 2009 order and judgment, were returned to the court as undeliverable. However,

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKA CHRISTINA ALFARO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-1997 FCD EFB PS

vs.

RITA MONTELONGO,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, was referred to the undersigned by

Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On

October 15, 2008, the undersigned issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint and granting

plaintiff twenty days to file an amended complaint. Dckt. No. 3. Plaintiff failed to file an

amended complaint or otherwise respond to the October 15, 2008 order; therefore, on January

27, 2009, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations which recommended that the

action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dckt. No. 4. On March 19, 2009, the assigned

district judge adopted that recommendation, dismissed the action, closed the case, and entered

judgment accordingly.1

 Dckt. Nos. 6, 7. 

Case 2:08-cv-01997-FCD-EFB Document 9 Filed 04/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

plaintiff was properly served with those filings. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the

court apprised of her current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of

documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 

2

Notwithstanding that judgment, on April 14, 2010, plaintiff filed a “declaration” with the

court. Dckt. No. 8. Plaintiff’s recent filing does not appear to be one contemplated by the

Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure. Therefore, this document will be disregarded. 

Plaintiff is advised that the court will disregard and issue no response to any future filings in this

closed case. 

Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s April 14, 2010 filing, Dckt. No. 8, is disregarded; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order; the January 27, 2009

findings and recommendations, Dckt. No. 4; the March 19, 2009 order, Dckt. No. 6; and the

March 19, 2009 judgment, Dckt. No. 7, on plaintiff at P.O. Box 1862, Elk Grove, California

95759.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 28, 2010.

Case 2:08-cv-01997-FCD-EFB Document 9 Filed 04/28/10 Page 2 of 2