Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06871/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06871-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN D. PEEVY, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

BILL LOCKYER, et al., )

)

)

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:03-cv-06871-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 32)

ORDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 21)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On December 8, 2003, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254 in this Court. (Doc. 1). On February 7, 2005, Petitioner filed a Second Amended

Petition. (Doc. 21). 

On September 21, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed Findings and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied on the merits. 

(Doc. 32). This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice

that any objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. To

date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

Case 1:03-cv-06871-LJO -TAG Document 33 Filed 10/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed September 21, 2007 (Doc. 32), is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 21), is DENIED

with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 18, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06871-LJO -TAG Document 33 Filed 10/18/07 Page 2 of 2