Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02554/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02554-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. C 06-02554 JW 

41033752.1 

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

STEPHEN M. RYAN (DC Bar No. 359099) (sryan@manatt.com) 

700 12th Street, N.W., Suite 1100 

Washington, DC 20005-4075 

Telephone: (202) 585-6500 

Facsimile: (202) 585-6600 

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

CHAD S. HUMMEL (CA Bar No. 139055) (chummel@manatt.com) 

JACK S. YEH (CA Bar No. 174286) (jyeh@manatt.com) 

11355 W. Olympic Boulevard 

Los Angeles, CA 90064 

Telephone: (310) 312-4000 

Facsimile: (310) 312-4224 

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

CHRISTOPHER L. WANGER (CA Bar No. 164751) (cwanger@manatt.com) 

JOHN P. KERN (CA Bar No. 206001) (jkern@manatt.com) 

1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 

Telephone: (650) 812-1300 

Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

GARY KREMEN, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR 

INTERNET NUMBERS LTD., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 06-2554 JW 

[Related to Case No. C 98-20718 JW] 

STIPULATED REQUEST AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE 

HEARING ON (1) DEFENDANT 

AMERICAN REGISTRY OF INTERNET 

NUMBERS, LTD.’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PURSUANT 

TO 12(B)(6), OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR 

A STAY; AND (2) CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

WHEREAS, Defendant American Registry of Internet Numbers, LTD’s (“ARIN”) Motion 

To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to 12(b)(6), Or, Alternatively, For A Stay (“Motion to 

Dismiss\Stay”) is currently set for hearing in this Court on September 11, 2006; 

Case 5:06-cv-02554-JW Document 26 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. C 06-02554 JW 

41033752.1

2

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Gary Kremen (“Plaintiff”) filed his Opposition to the Motion to 

Dismiss\Stay on August 21, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference is set in this matter for September 

11, 2006 at 10:00 am, and the Joint Case Management Statement filing deadline is September 4, 

2006. 

WHEREAS, in the related case Kremen v. Cohen, Case No. C 98-20718 JW (the “Kremen 

v. Cohen Action”), also before the Honorable James Ware, ARIN’s Motion For Clarification, Or, 

In The Alternative, For Modification Of The Order Dated September 17, 2001, Entitled “Order 

Re: Registration Of IP Numbers (NETBLOCKS) In The Name Of Judgment Creditor (“Motion to 

Clarify\Modify”) is also currently scheduled for September 11, 2006; 

WHEREAS, in connection with the related case Kremen v. Cohen Action, the parties have 

come to an agreement regarding the production and review of information in ARIN’s possession, 

continuation of the current September 11, 2006, hearing and August 28, 2006, Reply deadline on 

the Motion to Clarify\Modify in that action, a schedule for the filing of (and page limitations for) 

a supplemental brief from Plaintiff and a singular Reply brief from ARIN on Plaintiff’s 

Opposition and the to-be-filed supplemental brief, and a continued hearing date regarding same in 

the Kremen v. Cohen Actioni and are concurrently seeking a stipulated continuance re same in 

that matter; 

WHEREAS, to the extent ARIN’s production of information in the related Kremen v. 

Cohen Action may affect any of the issues on ARIN’s Motion to Dismiss\Stay in this action, the 

parties have come to an agreement regarding the Plaintiff’s filing (if any) of a supplemental brief 

and page limitations regarding the production of such information; and 

WHEREAS, in the interests of judicial economy, the parties have come to an agreement 

regarding the continuation of the current September 11 hearing and August 28 Reply deadline on 

ARIN’s Motion to Dismiss\Stay, a schedule for the filing of (and page limitations for) a 

supplemental brief from Plaintiff and a singular Reply brief from ARIN on Plaintiff’s Opposition 

and the to-be-filed supplemental brief, a continued hearing date regarding same in this action, and 

a continued date for the Case Management Conference and filing of the Case Management 

Case 5:06-cv-02554-JW Document 26 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. C 06-02554 JW 

41033752.1

3

Statement. 

WHEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by the parties through their respective counsel that: 

(1) the current September 11, 2006, hearing and the August 28, 2006, Reply deadline on 

ARIN’s Motion to Dismiss\Stay shall be continued; 

(2) Plaintiff will be allowed to file and personally or electronically serve a supplemental 

brief on the Motion to Dismiss\Stay (not to exceed 15 pages) relating solely and exclusively to 

the information produced by ARIN pursuant to the Stipulation (and no other issues) in the related 

Kremen v. Cohen Action by September 18, 2006; 

(3) ARIN’s Reply brief (not to exceed 25 pages) responding to Plaintiff’s August 21, 

2006, Opposition and Plaintiff’s to-be-filed supplemental brief must be filed and personally or 

electronically served no later than October 2, 2006; 

(4) the hearing date on ARIN’s Motion to Dismiss\Stay and the Case Management 

Conference shall be continued to October 23, 2006, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as may be 

heard, as determined by the Court’s availability. (The parties are also available on October 24, 

25, and 26, 2006.) The Case Management Conference shall be due seven calendar days before 

the new hearing date. 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Jack 

S. Yeh hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 

Dated: August 25, 2006 

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

By: /s/ Jack S. Yeh 

 Jack S. Yeh 

Counsel for Defendant

AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, 

LTD. 

Dated: August 25, 2006 

KRONENBERGER HANLEY, LLP 

By: /s/ Terri R. Hanley 

 Terri R. Hanley 

Counsel for Plaintiff

GARY KREMEN 

Case 5:06-cv-02554-JW Document 26 Filed 08/28/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. C 06-02554 JW 

41033752.1

4

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby 

ordered as follows: 

(1) the current September 11, 2006, hearing and the August 28, 2006, Reply deadline on 

ARIN’s Motion to Dismiss\Stay shall be continued; 

(2) Plaintiff will be allowed to file and personally or electronically serve a supplemental 

brief on the Motion to Dismiss\Stay (not to exceed 15 pages) relating solely and exclusively to 

the information produced by ARIN pursuant to the Stipulation (and no other issues) in the related 

Kremen v. Cohen Action by September 18, 2006; 

(3) ARIN’s Reply brief (not to exceed 25 pages) on ARIN’s Motion to Dismiss\Stay 

responding to Plaintiff’s August 21, 2006, Opposition and Plaintiff’s to-be-filed supplemental 

brief must be filed and personally or electronically served no later than October 2, 2006; 

(4) the hearing date on ARIN’s Motion to Dismiss\Stay and the Case Management 

Conference shall be continued to October 23, 2006, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as may be 

heard, as determined by the Court’s availability. The Case Management Conference shall be due 

seven calendar days before the new hearing date. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated August 28, 2006 __________________________ 

 The Honorable James Ware 

 United States District Court Judge 

The Case Mgmt Conf. is set 10/23/06 at 10:00 a.m.

Case 5:06-cv-02554-JW Document 26 Filed 08/28/06 Page 4 of 4