Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01827/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01827-203/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE COMPLAINT

CASE NO. M: 07-1827 1

sf-2863690

MELVIN R. GOLDMAN (CA SB NO. 34097) 

MGoldman@mofo.com 

STEPHEN P. FRECCERO (CA SB NO. 131093) 

SFreccero@mofo.com 

DEREK F. FORAN (CA SB NO. 224569) 

DForan@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

Counsel for Defendant 

Epson Imaging Devices Corporation

[Additional counsel and parties listed on signature 

page]

DAVID L. MEYER 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Suite 6000 

Washington, DC 20006-1888 

Telephone: 202.887.1500 

Facsimile: 202.887.0763 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-03205-SI 

TracFone Wireless, Inc. 

 Plaintiff, 

v.

AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics 

Corporation America, Inc.; Chi Mei Corporation; 

Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei 

Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co. Ltd.; 

Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.; Nexgen Mediatech USA, 

Inc.; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; 

Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.; Tatung Company 

of America, Inc.; HannStar Display Corporation; 

LG Display Co. Ltd.; LG Display America Inc.; 

Sharp Corporation; Sharp Electronics 

Corporation; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba 

America Electronics Components, Inc.; Toshiba 

Mobile Display Co., Ltd.; Toshiba America 

Information Systems, Inc., 

 Defendants. 

Master File No. M:07-1827 SI 

MDL No. 1827

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING SERVICE 

AND SCHEDULING

Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-03205-SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING SERVICE 

AND SCHEDULING 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1929 Filed 07/28/10 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE COMPLAINT

CASE NO. M: 07-1827 2

sf-2863690

WHEREAS plaintiff TracFone Wireless, Inc. (“TracFone”) filed the above captioned 

lawsuit on May 4, 2010 in United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; 

WHEREAS TracFone filed a Notice of Tag-Along Action to In re TFT-LCD (Flat 

Panel) Antitrust Litigation, Case No. M:07-CV-1827-SI, MDL No. 1827, on May 20, 2010; 

WHEREAS on June 22, 2010, the case was transferred to the Northern District of 

California, and assigned to the Honorable Susan Illston; 

WHEREAS, the undersigned Defendants have agreed to waive service and the parties 

have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), to extend the time within which the 

Defendants must move against, answer or otherwise respond to TracFone’s Complaint; 

WHEREAS, this extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already 

fixed by the Court; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among 

the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, TracFone, on the one hand, and 

defendants Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei 

Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co. Ltd.; Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.; Nexgen Mediatech 

USA, Inc.; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; Tatung Company of America, Inc.; HannStar 

Display Corporation; LG Display Co. Ltd.; LG Display America Inc.; Sharp Corporation; Sharp 

Electronics Corporation; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc.; 

Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.; and Toshiba America Information Systems (collectively, 

“Defendants”) on the other hand, as follows: 

1. Defendants waive service of TracFone’s Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 4(d). 

2. Defendants will have until September 17, 2010, to move against, answer or 

otherwise respond to TracFone’s Complaint. 

3. In the event that TracFone amends its Original Complaint prior to September 17, 

2010, TracFone will provide Defendants with reasonable notice of its intent to do so by no later 

than September 3, 2010, and Defendants will have until either 45 days from the date of 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1929 Filed 07/28/10 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE COMPLAINT

CASE NO. M: 07-1827 3

sf-2863690

amendment, or September 17, 2010, whichever is later, to move against, answer or otherwise 

respond to the Amended Complaint. 

4. Entering into this stipulation does not effect a waiver of any defense under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. This stipulation does not constitute a waiver of any 

challenge to personal jurisdiction by any Defendant. 

5. Defendants do not object to counsel for TracFone participating in depositions 

prior to the time that Defendants respond to the Complaint or Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: July 26, 2010 By: /s/ David B. Esau 

 James B. Baldinger 

Robert L. Ciotti 

David B. Esau 

Carlton Fields, P.A. 

525 Okeechobee Boulevard 

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 

(561) 659-7070 

(561) 659-7368 (Fax) 

Counsel for TracFone Wireless, Inc.

By: /s/ Stephen P. Freccero

Melvin Goldman (CA SB NO. 34097) 

Stephen P. Freccero (CA SB NO. 131093) 

Derek F. Foran (CA SB NO. 224569) 

mgoldman@mofo.com 

sfreccero@mofo.com 

dforan@mofo.com 

Morrison & Foerster LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

(415) 268-7000 

(415) 268-7522 (Fax) 

Counsel for Defendants Epson Imaging 

Device Corporation 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1929 Filed 07/28/10 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE COMPLAINT

CASE NO. M: 07-1827 4

sf-2863690

By: /s/ Steven F. Cherry

Steven F. Cherry

Gordon Pearson 

steven.cherry@wilmerhale.com 

gordon.pearson@wilmerhale.com 

Wilmer Cutler Pickering 

Hale and Dorr LLP 

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20006-3642

Counsel for Defendants

Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei 

Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan 

Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA 

Inc., Nexgen Mediatech Inc., Nexgen 

Mediatech USA Inc.

By: /s/ Bruce H. Jackson 

Bruce H. Jackson 

Bruce.h.jackson@bakernet.com 

Baker & McKenzie LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Counsel for Defendant 

Tatung Company of America, Inc.

By: /s/ Hugh F. Bangasser 

Hugh F. Bangasser 

Ramona Emerson 

hugh.bangasser@klgates.com 

ramona.emerson@klgates.com 

K& L Gates LLP

925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900 

Seattle, WA 98104-1158 

Counsel for Defendant 

Hannstar Display Corporation 

By: /s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz 

Michael R. Lazerwitz 

mlazerwitz@cgsh.com 

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP 

2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Counsel for Defendants 

LG Display Co., Ltd and LG Display 

America, Inc. 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1929 Filed 07/28/10 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO TRACFONE COMPLAINT

CASE NO. M: 07-1827 5

sf-2863690

By: /s/ Jacob R. Sorensen

Jacob R. Sorensen

jake.sorensen@pillsburylaw.com 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

50 Fremont Street, 5th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Counsel for Defendants 

Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics 

Corporation

By: /s/ Wayne A. Cross

Wayne A. Cross

Kristen McAhren 

John H. Chung 

wcross@whitecase.com 

kmcahren@whitecase.com 

jchung@whitecase.com 

WHITE & CASE LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036

Counsel for Defendants 

Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Matsushita 

Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America 

Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba 

America Information Systems, Inc. 

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other 

signatories thereto has been obtained. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Hon. Susan Illston 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 1929 Filed 07/28/10 Page 5 of 5