Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02583/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02583-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:206 Social Security Benefits

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LISA ANN DAY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-02583-AC 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se and in forma pauperis. On January 8, 2016, 

the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend within 30 days. ECF No. 3. The 

order cautioned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 4 ¶ 3. Plaintiff has not filed an amended 

complaint, nor taken any other action to prosecute this case. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a 

district judge to this matter. 

Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and 

E.D. Cal. R. 110, this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for 

failure to comply with the court’s order. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-02583-TLN-AC Document 4 Filed 04/12/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one (21) 

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: April 11, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-02583-TLN-AC Document 4 Filed 04/12/16 Page 2 of 2