Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01022/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01022-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TROAS V. BARNETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID NORMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-01022 (PC)

ORDER AMENDING SECOND

SCHEDULING ORDER FILED ON JUNE

25, 2012

(Doc. 142)

ORDER VACATING ORDER RE:

CONSENT FILED ON JUNE 25, 2012

(Doc. 143)

Plaintiff Troas V. Barnett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint

commencing this action on August 9, 2005. Doc. 1. This action now proceeds under the Third

Amended Complaint, filed on October 30, 2008, against Defendants Martin Gamboa, Angel Duran

andManuel Torres (“Defendants”) for events that occurred at California Substance Abuse Treatment

Facility, Corcoran. Doc. 48. Plaintiff is currently housed at Kern Valley State Prison.

On August 17, 2005, Plaintiff consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Doc. 9. On July

30, 2010, Defendants Duran and Torres consented to magistrate jurisdiction. Doc. 62. On December

29, 2010, Defendant Gaboa consented to magistrate jurisdiction. Doc. 93. On June 25, 2012, the

Court issued an order regarding whether the parties wish to consent or decline magistrate

jurisdiction. Doc. 143. 

Given that all the parties have given consent to magistrate jurisdiction, it is HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1

Case 1:05-cv-01022-BAM Document 144 Filed 06/25/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. The Court’s second scheduling order filed on June 25, 2012, is amended to omit the

requirement for parties to submit in writing whether they consent to magistrate judge

jurisdiction (Doc. 142); and

2. The Court VACATES its order regarding consent to magistrate jurisdiction filed on

June 25, 2012 (Doc. 143). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 25, 2012 

0jh02o UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

2

Case 1:05-cv-01022-BAM Document 144 Filed 06/25/12 Page 2 of 2