Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-92-01247/USCOURTS-ca10-92-01247-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FILL D 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT United States Coμrt ~f Appeals 

Tenth C1~t11t 

CLOVIS CARL GREEN, JR., 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v. 

HONORABLE 0. EDWARD SCHLATTER; 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 

DISTRICT OF COLORADO, 

Respondents-Appellees. 

APR 2 7 1993 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 92-1247 

(D.C. No. 92-F-1483) 

(D. Colo.) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before McKAY, Chief Judge, SEYMOUR, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

This appeal is taken from an order of the district court 

dismissing Mr. Green's "Petition for Declaratory and Injunctive 

Relief ." Mr. Green sought a declaration that the district court ' s 

practice of referring habeas corpus petitions to a magistrate 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

------------------

Appellate Case: 92-1247 Document: 010110220138 Date Filed: 04/27/1993 Page: 1 
merely repeats his complaint that No. 92-N-1014 took too long to 

be decided. This he does notwithstanding the fact that by the 

time he filed his brief in this case, No. 92-N- 1014 had long since 

been dismissed and not appealed. 

arguments. 

We find no merit in his 

The judgment of the United States District Court for the 

District of Colorado is AFFIRMED. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

3 

Appellate Case: 92-1247 Document: 010110220138 Date Filed: 04/27/1993 Page: 2