Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00140/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00140-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRUCE ROBINSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0140 WBS DAD P

vs.

R.N. PURCELL, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed January 31, 2007, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On March 14, 2007, plaintiff was granted

an additional thirty days to file an amended complaint and was forewarned that failure to do so

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s

order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

Case 2:07-cv-00140-WBS-DAD Document 15 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 26, 2007.

DAD:lg

robi0140.fta

Case 2:07-cv-00140-WBS-DAD Document 15 Filed 04/27/07 Page 2 of 2