Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01094/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01094-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARK W. COLEMAN, #117306

NUTTALL & COLEMAN

2445 CAPITOL STREET, SUITE 150

FRESNO, CA 93721

PHONE (559) 233-2900

FAX (559) 485-3852

 

ATTORNEYS FOR Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

* * * * * *

TINA PEREZ; CONNIE GARCIA; ODISY

JANAS, a minor, by and through her

Guardian Ad Litem, Roseanne Cortez;

AIDEN GAIGE RAMIREZ, a minor, by and

through his Guardian Ad Litem, Roberta

Cooke,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION; JAMES A. YATES,

WARDEN, PLEASANT VALLEY STATE

PRISON; MATTHEW CATE,

SECRETARY, CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION and DOES 1 through

100, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-01094-AWI-SKO

STIPULATION AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective

counsel, that the Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for August 24, 2010, be continued for

90 days, and as is convenient to the court’s calendar.

On August 4, 2010, counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendants participated in a telephonic

conference. During the course of that conference, it was agreed that the parties would stipulate to

a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference. The reason for the Stipulation is that Rule

(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY)

Case 1:10-cv-01094-AWI-SKO Document 5 Filed 08/12/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

26 disclosures are just beginning. Counsel for defendant only recently received the incident reports

and records pertinent to this case. These records are voluminous as this incident involves a riot with

over 100 inmates. Neither party has had sufficient time to review the facts of this case. Counsel for

plaintiffs and defendants have agreed to a protective order allowing the plaintiffs to obtain a copy

of the incident reports and records pertinent to this case and review those records. 

Counsel for the parties believe that they would be unable to have a discovery plan by the

Mandatory Scheduling Conference and hereby request a continuance of 90 days.

DATED: August 10, 2010. NUTTALL & COLEMAN

/s/ MARK W. COLEMAN

_______________________

MARK W. COLEMAN

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED: August 10, 2010. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE

/s/ MICHELLE ANGUS

 

MICHELLE LEE ANGUS

 Attorneys for Defendants

O R D E R

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for August 24, 2010, is VACATED;

2. The Scheduling Conference is RESET to November 23, 2010, at 9:30 a.m.

Dated: August 11, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-01094-AWI-SKO Document 5 Filed 08/12/10 Page 2 of 2