Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-02521/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-02521-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C-02-2521-JF (RS)

ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

(JFLC2)

**E-Filed 5/31/05**

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

NAZOMI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

ARM HOLDINGS, PLC, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case Number C-02-2521-JF (RS)

ORDER SETTING STATUS

CONFERENCE

The judgment in this matter having been vacated and remanded by the Federal Circuit,

the Court will set a status conference to discuss further proceedings. Defendants assert that the

Federal Circuit did not hold that there was any substantive error in this Court’s ruling, but rather

stated that the ruling was not sufficiently detailed to permit appellate review; they request leave

to provide proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law confirming the Court’s earlier

summary judgment of noninfringement. They also request a stay of the action pending issuance

of a new summary judgment order in their favor.

Plaintiff asserts that the Federal Circuit opinion expressly contemplates further

proceedings, such as submission of additional evidence and new competing infringement charts,

Case 5:02-cv-02521-JF Document 207 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C-02-2521-JF (RS)

ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

(JFLC2)

and that Defendants’ proposed approach would be inconsistent with the Federal Circuit’s

instructions and would impose further needless delay. Plaintiff requests a status conference for

the purpose of discussing the scheduling of a Markman hearing, motions, discovery deadlines

and the like.

The Court is not inclined to reissue its prior ruling without further proceedings, but at the

same time it is not persuaded that starting at ground zero as proposed by Nazomi is either

necessary or appropriate. The Court requests that each party submit a detailed proposal as to how

this Court should proceed on remand. Such proposal shall be filed and served on or before June

7, 2005. The parties shall appear for a status conference to discuss further proceedings in this

case at 10:30 a.m. on June 10, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

DATED: 5/31/05

/s/ electronic signature authorized 

__________________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:02-cv-02521-JF Document 207 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case No. C-02-2521-JF (RS)

ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

(JFLC2)

Copies of Order served on:

Ethan B. Andelman andelmane@howrey.com, andelmane@howrey.com

Brandon D. Baum bbaum@cooley.com

Thomas J. Friel , Jr tfriel@cooley.com, fnyland@cooley.com;prussell@cooley.com

Darren J. Gold goldd@howrey.com, hobbsw@howrey.com

Jeffrey S. Karr jkarr@cooley.com

Andrew Y. Piatnicia piatniciaa@howrey.com,

buccinol@howrey.com;taylorr@howrey.com;guthartg@howrey.com;guthartg@howrey.com

Sayuri K. Sharper ssharper@cooley.com,

Bernard C. Shek bshek@skadden.com 

Case 5:02-cv-02521-JF Document 207 Filed 05/31/05 Page 3 of 3