Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00968/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00968-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH DAWSON, No. CIV S-03-0967 MCE GGH P

Plaintiff,

v.

 ORDER

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Governor of California, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

STEVEN GOMEZ, No. CIV S-03-0968 MCE GGH P

Plaintiff,

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Governor of California, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

///

///

///

///

Case 2:03-cv-00968-MCE -GGH Document 19 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

EDWARD HARO, No. CIV S-03-0973 MCE GGH P

Plaintiff, 

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Governor of California, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

ZACHARIAH GUZMAN, No. CIV S-03-0977 MCE GGH P

Plaintiff,

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Governor of California, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

NICOLAS CURRAN, No. CIV S-03-0964 MCE GGH P

Plaintiff, 

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Governor of California, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiffs in the above entitled actions are state prisoners

proceeding pro se who have filed civil rights actions seeking

relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On October 27, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

Case 2:03-cv-00968-MCE -GGH Document 19 Filed 12/15/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Plaintiff Dawson is the Plaintiff in the newly designated 1

lead case; however, Plaintiff Curran is the Plaintiff in the former

lead case and is the only party with standing to object to a

recommendation of dismissal of his own case. Plaintiff Curran has

not filed objections.

3

Plaintiff Dawson has filed Objections to the Findings and

Recommendations to which Defendants have filed a reply. 1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed October 27, 2005

are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff Curran’s case, Curran v. Schwarzenneger, et

al., No. CIV S 03-0964 MCE GGH P, is dismissed as moot.

DATED: December 14, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-00968-MCE -GGH Document 19 Filed 12/15/05 Page 3 of 3