Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_24-cv-00822/USCOURTS-azd-2_24-cv-00822-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Donald A. Allen,

Petitioner,

v. 

United States of America,

Respondent.

No. CV-24-00822-PHX-SRB(JZB)

ORDER

Petitioner, Donald A. Allen, filed his Writ of Error Coram Nobis to Vacate 

Conviction and Dismiss Indictment Pursuant to All Writs Act 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1651(a) 

(“Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis”) on April 10, 2024. Respondent filed its Response

on August 23, 2024 and Petitioner filed his Reply on October 28, 2024. On December 4, 

2024, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation recommending that the 

Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation 

within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such 

objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the order of this Court. (Doc. 23)

. . .

Case 2:24-cv-00822-SRB Document 24 Filed 01/06/25 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis

and dismissing it with prejudice. (Doc. 1)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not demonstrated reasonable 

jurist could find the ruling debatable.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

Dated this 6th day of January, 2025.

Case 2:24-cv-00822-SRB Document 24 Filed 01/06/25 Page 2 of 2