Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00290/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00290-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A copy of the court’s Civil Local Rules are available from the clerk of the court, or from 1

the “Rules” section of the court’s website (www.cand.uscourts.gov).

Magistrate Judges have authority to hear dispositive motions, such as the motion to 2

dismiss, only in cases where all parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c)(1).

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MARIANO AYALA GARCIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Defendant

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 10-0290 PVT

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING TO MAY

4, 2010 AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR

PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A “CONSENT TO

PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE,” OR ELSE A

“DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND

REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT”

On February 5, 2010, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73-

1(a)(2), no later than five court days after that motion was filed each party was required to file either 1

a written consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge, or request reassignment to a District

Judge. Neither party has yet done so. Therefore, based on the file herein, 2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the parties to file either a “Consent to

Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge,” or else a “Declination to Proceed Before a United

States Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment,” is extended to April 16, 2010. Both forms

Case 5:10-cv-00290-PVT Document 8 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

are available from the clerk of the court, or from the “Forms” section of the court’s website

(www.cand.uscourts.gov).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is

CONTINUED to May 4, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5 of this court. In addition, because

Plaintiff late-filed his opposition on March 29, 2010 (it was due March 16, 2010), the deadline for

Defendant to file a reply brief is continued to May 20, 2010.

Dated: April 1, 2010

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00290-PVT Document 8 Filed 04/02/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 3

Counsel automatically notified of this filing via the court’s Electronic Case Filing system.

copies mailed on 4/2/10 to:

Mariano Ayala Garcia

980 El Toro Drive

Hollister, CA 95023 

 /s/ Donna Kirchner for 

 MARTHA BROWN

 Courtroom Deputy 

Case 5:10-cv-00290-PVT Document 8 Filed 04/02/10 Page 3 of 3