Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03816/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03816-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

MOTION FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING OF REPLY BRIEF ON MOTION TO REMAND

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAWRENCE ALIOTO

California State Bar No. 38931

582 Market St., Ste. 607

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 399-0533

Fax: (415) 399-9868

Email: larralioto@yahoo.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Maureen Dwyer Swinden,

Trustee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MAUREEN DWYER SWINDEN, TRUSTEE 

AND BENEFICIARY OF THE THOMAS R. 

DWYER TRUST,

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC.; 

VANGUARD MARKETING CORPORATION; 

and SALLY D. SLICHTER,

Defendants.

________________________________

SALLY D. SLICHTER,

Counterclaimant,

vs.

MAUREEN DWYER SWINDEN,

Counterclaim Defendant

________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 09-03816 SI

MOTION FOR ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME FOR FILING OF REPLY 

BRIEF ON MOTION TO REMAND

Date: January 15, 2010

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Courtroom: 10, 19th Fl.

Judge: Hon. Susan Illston

Case3:09-cv-03816-SI Document39 Filed01/05/10 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Susan Illston

Case 3:09-cv-03816-SI Document 42 Filed 01/11/10 Page 1 of 3
MOTION FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING OF REPLY BRIEF ON MOTION TO REMAND

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Motion

Plaintiff’s reply brief on the above referenced motion was due on 

December 31, 2009. On that day undersigned counsel, who is solely

responsible for prosecution of the present action, filed a lengthy

document in a case pending in Santa Clara County Superior Court, the

preparation of which document occupied undersigne d counsel’s time in

the short week of December 28, 2009. During that week undersigned

counsel contacted opposing counsel in this case, who stated they would 

not oppose a 7-day extension of plaintiff’s time to file a reply brief 

on the plaintiff’s motion to remand. There have been no prior

extensions. Plaintiff’s reply brief will be of assistance to the

court. Defendant Vanguard’s opposition to plaintiff’s motion to remand 

contains arguments as to which there is yet in the record no response.

Plaintiff therefore moves for an order extending to January 8,

2010 at 5:00 p.m. the time to file a reply brief on plaintiff’s motion 

to remand to state court.

January 5, 2010 Respectfully,

/s/

________________________________

Lawrence Alioto

Attorney for Plaintiff, Maureen 

Dwyer Swinden 

Case 3:09-cv-03816-SI Document 42 Filed 01/11/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:09-cv-03816-SI Document39 Filed01/05/10 Page2 of 3
MOTION FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING OF REPLY BRIEF ON MOTION TO REMAND

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF COUNSEL

I, Lawrence Alioto, declare under penalty of perjury that I

prepared the foregoing motion and that all statements therein are 

true and correct.

San Francisco, CA

January 5, 2010

/s/

________________________________

Lawrence Alioto

Case 3:09-cv-03816-SI Document 42 Filed 01/11/10 Page 3 of 3 Case3:09-cv-03816-SI Document39 Filed01/05/10 Page3 of 3