Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-00916/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-00916-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

David Alan Borggreen, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-15-00916-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

 Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

2254 on May 20, 2015 raising two grounds for relief: 1) that his term of supervision after 

the completion of his sentence violates his rights to equal protection and to be free from 

double jeopardy; and 2) the trial court illegally changed his term of probation from 

concurrent to consecutive. Respondents filed their Response to Petitioner’s Petition for 

Writ of Habeas Corpus on May 5, 2016. Petitioner filed his reply on May 26, 2016. On 

June 14, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and Recommendation 

recommending that the petition be denied. 

 In hes Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time 

to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation 

have been filed. 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. 

Case 2:15-cv-00916-SRB Document 23 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the order of this Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

and dismissing it with prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

 Dated this 7th day of July, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-00916-SRB Document 23 Filed 07/07/16 Page 2 of 2