Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01101/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01101-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On November 20, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation seeking to dismiss the action with 

prejudice. (Doc. 16) The stipulation relies upon Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

under which “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of 

dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) 

a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once 

such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required for the dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice of dismissal 

with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 23, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MYRNA ARIAS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

INTERMIX WIRE TRANSFER, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01101 --- JLT 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

(Doc. 16)

Case 1:15-cv-01101-JLT Document 17 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 1