Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02829/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02829-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TIMOTHY L. GASTILE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T. VIRGA, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:11-cv-2829-JAM-EFB P 

ORDER 

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On February 10, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

proper analysis. 

///// 

Case 2:11-cv-02829-JAM-EFB Document 60 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 10, 2015, are adopted in full; 

 2. Defendants’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement, ECF No. 56, is granted; 

3. Defendants are directed to tender the filing fee for this action to the Clerk of the Court; 

4. Upon receipt of the filing fee, this action will be dismissed with prejudice. The 

dismissal with prejudice will constitute an adjudication on the merits. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 So ordered 

DATED: June 9, 2015 

 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 2:11-cv-02829-JAM-EFB Document 60 Filed 06/10/15 Page 2 of 2