Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04019/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04019-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAITHIRA NJENGA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAN MATEO COUNTY,

Defendant. /

No. C-08-04019 EDL

ORDER 

On April 6, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Request for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order Granting

Summary Judgment of Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Claim Against Individual Defendants in their

Individual Capacities. The Court construes this filing to be a Motion for Leave of Court to file a

Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3), alleging a “manifest failure by

the Court to consider . . . dispositive legal arguments which were presented to the Court. . . .” 

Although Civil Local Rule 7-9 does not provide for a response, the Court requires a responsive brief

from Defendant. Accordingly, no later than April 15, 2010, Defendant shall file a responsive brief

not to exceed three pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 8, 2010 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04019-EDL Document 112 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 1