Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-03262/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-03262-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DEPOSIT 

TAXED COSTS WITH CLERK 

Case No. C 02-03262 DLJ (EMC) 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

SHOPOFF & CAVALLO LLP 

Gregory S. Cavallo (Bar No. 173270) 

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1670 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 984-1975 

Facsimile: (415) 984-1978 

Email: greg@shopoffcavallo.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff FRANK T. SHUM 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

FRANK T. SHUM, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

INTEL CORPORATION, JEAN-MARC 

VERDIELL, and LIGHTLOGIC, INC., 

 Defendants. 

______________________________________

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM 

CASE NO. C02-3262 DLJ (EMC) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

DEPOSIT TAXED COSTS WITH CLERK 

Judge: Hon. D. Lowell Jensen 

 WHEREAS, on June 29, 2009, the Clerk of the United States District Court, Northern District of 

California, taxed costs in favor of Plaintiff Frank Shum, against Defendants, in the amount of $195,523.27. 

Defendants did not challenge the Clerk of Court’s Bill of Costs. 

 WHEREAS, also on June 29, 2009, the Clerk of Court taxed costs in favor of Defendants, against 

Plaintiff Frank Shum, in the amount of $507,644.52. Plaintiff challenged that Bill of Costs. By Order of 

October 23, 2009, the Court reduced the costs taxed against Plaintiff Frank Shum to $329,891.55. 

 WHEREAS, the net costs award is in favor of Defendants, against Plaintiff Frank Shum, in the 

amount of $134,368.28. 

Case 4:02-cv-03262-DLJ Document 1023 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 2
 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DEPOSIT 

TAXED COSTS WITH CLERK 

Case No. C 02-03262 DLJ (EMC) 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

 WHEREAS, in order to avoid potential disputes about the right of Plaintiff Frank Shum to obtain a 

stay of enforcement, and to avoid the additional expense of posting a supersedeas bond, the parties have 

agreed, and Plaintiff Frank Shum hereby requests, pursuant to Civ. L.R. 65.1-1(b)(4), that Plaintiff Frank 

Shum be allowed to deposit the full amount of net taxed costs, $134,368.28, with the Clerk of Court, 

pending resolution of the appeals of these matters. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the parties to the 

above-captioned action, by and through their respective counsel, that the plaintiff Frank T. Shum may 

deposit the full amount of the costs judgment against him, $134,368.28, with the Clerk of this Court. Such 

deposit shall be made within five (5) business days of issuance of this Order, or April 16, 2010, whichever is 

later. 

DATED: April 2, 2010 SHOPOFF & CAVALLO LLP 

 By ___/s/ Gregory S. Cavallo________________ Gregory S. Cavallo 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff FRANK T. SHUM 

DATED: April 2, 2010 TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP 

 By ____/s/ Jonathan A. Patchen______________ Jonathan A. Patchen 

 Attorneys for Defendants INTEL CORPORATION, 

 JEAN-MARC VERDIELL, and LIGHTLOGIC, INC. 

ORDER

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 ________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:02-cv-03262-DLJ Document 1023 Filed 04/08/10 Page 2 of 2