Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00488/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00488-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT HOLTRY,

Plaintiff,

v.

RIOS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00488-GSA

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT

CERTIFIED PRISONER TRUST ACCOUNT

STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

(Doc. 2)

Plaintiff Robert Holtry, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U. S. C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1915 and a copy of his prison trust account statement. However, the copy

of Plaintiff’s prison trust account statement was not properly certified as it appears that Plaintiff

filled out the certificate and wrote “see attached form im Holtry,” and appeared to be a printout of

an inmate inquiry rather than an official inmate trust account statement. See 28 U. S. C. §

1915(a)(2). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to either pay the $350.00 filing fee or submit

a certified copy of his trust account statement in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date

of service of this order, Plaintiff shall submit a certified copy of his prison trust account statement

(executed by appropriate prison personnel) for the entire six month period immediately preceding

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

1

Case 1:10-cv-00488-LJO -GBC Document 4 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the filing of the complaint, or in the alternative, pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action. Plaintiff’s

failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 22, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

b742a4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00488-LJO -GBC Document 4 Filed 03/23/10 Page 2 of 2