Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01658/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01658-80/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE CORPORATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SAP AG, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C-07-01658 PJH (EDL)

ORDER REQUIRING JOINT

STATEMENT

On August 23, 2010, the parties filed a letter requesting leave to file certain discovery

motions on August 31, 2010 for hearing on October 5, 2010. This request comes almost nine

months after the discovery cutoff date and only approximately two months before trial. The parties’

letter reserves the right to raise the issue of the timeliness of the motions pursuant to Civil Local

Rule 7-8. Accordingly, prior to the Court’s decision on whether the parties may file these motions,

the parties shall file a joint statement explaining why they believe that these proposed motions are

timely under Local Rule 7-8. Further, it is unclear from the parties’ letter whether there will be a

motion to compel, but to the extent applicable, the parties shall also address timeliness pursuant to

Civil Local Rule 26-2. The joint statement shall be no longer than ten pages and shall be filed no

later than September 1, 2010. If the Court decides to permit the parties to file the proposed motions,

it may decide to set a shortened briefing schedule for hearing on the motions on October 5, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 24, 2010 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document 807 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 1