Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02389/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02389-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:6901 Resource &amp; Recovery Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM

GREBEN & ASSOCIATES

1332 ANACAPA, SUITE 110

SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101

TELEPHONE: (805) 963-9090

FACSIMILE: (805) 963-9098

Jan A. Greben, State Bar No. 103464

jan@grebenlaw.com

Jenna L. Motola, State Bar No. 246738

jenna@grebenlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant RICHARD C. PETERS 

and RAMONA W. PETERS, individually and as Trustee

of the PETERS FAMILY TRUST.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC

SUBSTANCES CONTROL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PAYLESS CLEANERS, COLLEGE

CLEANERS, HEIDINGER CLEANERS,

NORGE VILLAGE CLEANERS, CAVA,

INC., a California corporation, LOBDELL

CLEANERS, CITY OF CHICO, NORVILLE

R. WEISS, JANET L. WEISS, PAUL

HEIDINGER, INEZ N. HEIDINGER, 5TH

AND IVY, a General Partnership, RICHARD

C. PETERS and RAMONA W. PETERS,

individually and as trustees of the Peters

Family Trust, BETTY M. ROLLAG,

RANDALL ROLLAG, and TAMI ROLLAG,

Defendants

Case No. CIVS-02-2389 LKK DAD

ASSIGNED TO

HON. LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

COURTROOM 4

COMPLAINT FILED: 10/31/02

TRIAL DATE: 07/22/08

ORDER APPOINTING 

GUARDIAN AD LITEM 

RICHARD AND RAMONA PETERS,

Individually and as co-trustees of the Peters

Family Trust, 

Third Party Plaintiffs

vs. 

NORGE DIVISION OF BORG-WARNER

CORPORATION, et al.

Third Party Defendants.

Case 2:02-cv-02389-LKK -DAD Document 361 Filed 10/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM

On September ___, 2007, Richard and Ramona Peters, individually and as co-trustees of

the Peters Family Trust, moved this court for the appointment of a guardian ad litem for Richard

C. Peters. The court has read the papers submitted, reviewed the authorities cited, and

considered the argument of counsel. 

It appears to the Court that Richard C. Peters is an incompetent person and as such is

incapable of representing himself in this action, and that no guardian or representative has been

appointed to act on his behalf . 

It further appears that Ramona W. Peters is a person fully competent to understand and

protect the rights of Richard C. Peters, and she has no interest adverse to that of Richard C.

Peters, is not connected in business with any adverse party or attorney or counsel of any adverse

party, and has consented to act as the guardian ad litem for Richard C. Peters in this action.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The motion is GRANTED;

2. Ramona W. Peters is appointed guardian ad litem of Richard C. Peters in this action.

DATED: October 2, 2007.

Case 2:02-cv-02389-LKK -DAD Document 361 Filed 10/02/07 Page 2 of 2