Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00511/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00511-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:4053 Breach of Insurance Contract

---

STIPULATION TO PERMIT CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS AFTER DISCOVERY CUTOFF 

SV 347028301v1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THOMAS HOLDEN (No. 130277) 

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 655-1266 

Facsimile: (415) 707-2010 

HoldenT@GTlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE BURLINGTON 

INSURANCE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PETER GREENBAUM, 

 Plaintiff; 

v. 

THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 16-cv-00511-RS

STIPULATION TO PERMIT CERTAIN 

DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE NON-EXPERT 

DISCOVERY CUTOFF 

WHEREAS, the cutoff for non-expert discovery in this matter is October 28, 2016; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Defendant with three deposition notices on September 28, 2016, 

for the depositions of the following witnesses from The Burlington Insurance Company on October 

12 and 13, 2016: 1) BJ Cleaver; 2) Clifford Kelly; and 3) Person(s) Most Knowledgeable from The 

Burlington Insurance Company (the “Depositions”); 

WHEREAS, on September 29, 2016, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment to be 

heard on November 3, 2016; 

WHEREAS, Defendant advised Plaintiff that Defendant intended to seek a protective order to 

continue the Depositions until after the November 3, 2016 summary judgment hearing; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion for summary judgment is due on October 13, 

2016; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has objected to Defendant’s request to continue the Depositions, but a 

ORDER

Case 3:16-cv-00511-RS Document 25 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

STIPULATION TO PERMIT CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS AFTER DISCOVERY CUTOFF 

SV 347028301v1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

dispute remains over the timing of the Depositions; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff reserves all of its right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) on 

the grounds that Plaintiff cannot present facts essential to justify its opposition without conducting 

the Depositions; and 

 WHEREAS, there have been no previous time modifications in this case; 

 THEREFORE, the parties to this action, through their counsel of record, hereby STIPULATE 

as follows: 

1. The Depositions are hereby continued until after the November 3, 2016 hearing on 

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, or a time consistent with the Court’s ruling 

on the motion for summary judgment; 

2. Defendant will not object to the Depositions based on the non-expert discovery cutoff; and 

3. Defendant reserves all other bases on which to object to the Depositions. 

Dated: October 7, 2016 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 

By: /s/ Thomas Holden 

 Thomas Holden 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE 

COMPANY 

Dated: October 10, 2016 MILES & WESTBROOK 

By: /s/ Brian B. Miles 

 Brian B. Miles 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PETER GREENBAUM 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October ____, 2016 

 _______________________________________ 

Richard Seeborg 

United States District Judge 

11

Case 3:16-cv-00511-RS Document 25 Filed 10/11/16 Page 2 of 2