Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-01873/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-01873-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 150
Nature of Suit: Overpayments &amp; Enforcement of Judgments
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN MCSHANNOCK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.,

Defendant.

Case No. 18-cv-01873-EMC 

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS

Docket No. 38

Defendant has moved to dismiss this case, in part based on the argument that Plaintiffs’ 

claims under Section 2954.8(a) of the California Civil Code are preempted by the Home Owners’ 

Loan Act (“HOLA”). Having considered the briefing and argument on the motion, the Court 

hereby orders the parties to submit supplemental briefing addressing the following two questions.

(1) Whether there is legislative history indicating that Congress, in enacting HOLA, 

contemplated that HOLA-governed mortgage loans originating with federal savings 

associations would be resold on the secondary market.

(2) Whether HOLA-governed mortgage loans were in fact resold at the time HOLA 

was enacted in 1933, and if so, how common the practice was. 

The supplemental briefs shall be filed within two weeks of the date of this order, and each 

party’s brief shall not exceed 5 pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 11, 2018

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:18-cv-01873-EMC Document 48 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 1