Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01473/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01473-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA GRAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-01473 DLB PC

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT

(Document 56)

Plaintiff Dana Gray (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 

filed this civil rights action on September 12, 2013. 

On February 4, 2016, the Court found that Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint stated an 

Eighth Amendment claim and negligence claim against Defendants Mundunuri, Ziomek, Rebel, 

Romero, Comelli and Loadholt. 

Service documents were forwarded to the United States Marshal on February 24, 2016.

Defendant Rebel filed a motion to dismiss on April 29, 2016. Defendant Comelli filed an 

answer on April 29, 2016. The remaining Defendants have not yet appeared.

Also on April 29, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to “supplement” the complaint. She requests 

that the Court order Defendants to answer the complaint.

Whether and when the remaining Defendants file an answer depends on whether they are 

successfully served, when they are successfully served, and how they decide to respond to this 

Case 1:13-cv-01473-DAD-GSA Document 62 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

action. The Court does not order Defendants to file an answer, and Plaintiff’s motion is therefore 

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 2, 2016 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01473-DAD-GSA Document 62 Filed 05/02/16 Page 2 of 2