Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01207/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01207-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 150
Nature of Suit: Overpayments &amp; Enforcement of Judgments
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1466944.1 1

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ASSOCIATED WITH 

MOTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

JAMIE P. DREHER (Bar No. 209380) 

CHRISTOPHER B. BURTON (Bar No. 296582) 

621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814-4731 

Telephone: (916) 444-1000 

Facsimile: (916) 444-2100 

jdreher@downeybrand.com 

cburton@downeybrand.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ENRIQUE ALVAREZ ZARDAIN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ENRIQUE ALVAREZ ZARDAIN, an 

individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

IPACPA US, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, TRC HOLDINGS, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, and DOES 1-20, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01207-MCE-EFB

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

BRIEFING DEADLINES ASSOCIATED 

WITH MOTION SEEKING RELIEF 

FROM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

Date: January 12, 2017 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

Dept.: Courtroom 7 

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England 

RECITALS 

 A. On October 18, 2016, Plaintiff Enrique Alvarez Zardain (“Plaintiff”) filed his 

Motion Seeking Relief From Pretrial Scheduling Order (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 37.) The 

Motion was originally set for hearing on December 1, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. 

 B. On November 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Stipulation and Order to Continue 

Hearing on Motion Seeking Relief From Pretrial Scheduling Order, seeking to continue the 

hearing on the Motion to December 15, 2016. (Dkt. No. 39.) On November 17, 2016, the Court 

entered the Order continuing the hearing to December 15, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 40.) 

 C. On December 1, 2016, Plaintiff filed a further Stipulation and Order to Continue 

Hearing on Motion Seeking Relief From Pretrial Scheduling Order, seeking to continue the 

hearing on the Motion to January 12, 2017, and extend the filing deadline for Defendant TRC 

Case 2:15-cv-01207-MCE-EFB Document 45 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 3
DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 1466944.1 2

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ASSOCIATED WITH 

MOTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

Holdings, Inc.’s opposition to December 8, 2016, and Plaintiff’s reply to December 15, 2016. 

(Dkt. No. 41.) 

 D. On December 8, 2016, Plaintiff filed a further Stipulation and Order to Continue 

Hearing on Motion Seeking Relief From Pretrial Scheduling Order, seeking, once again, to 

continue the hearing on the Motion to January 12, 2017, but requesting that the associated 

briefing deadlines be further extended to December 15, 2016 for Defendant TRC Holdings, Inc.’s 

opposition, and December 22, 2016 for Plaintiff’s reply. (Dkt. No. 42.) The Court has not yet 

entered an Order granting the stipulation. 

 E. On December 13, 2016, the Court entered its Order on the stipulation filed on 

December 1, 2016 (Dkt. No. 41), continuing the hearing to January 12, 2017, and extending the 

filing deadline for Defendant TRC Holdings, Inc.’s opposition to December 8, 2016, and 

Plaintiff’s reply to December 15, 2016. (Dkt. No. 43.) 

 F. The parties continue to discuss a settlement that would resolve this action in its 

entirety and therefore wish to further extend the briefing deadlines associated with the Motion, to 

avoid incurring additional attorneys’ fees at this time. 

 G. Given that the Court has yet to enter an Order granting the stipulation filed on 

December 8, 2016 (Dkt. No. 42), this Stipulation is meant to supersede the prior stipulation. The 

only germane distinction between the current Stipulation and the version filed on December 8, 

2016 is the stipulated briefing deadlines. 

STIPULATION 

In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, the dates for filing an opposition and 

1. Defendant TRC Holdings, Inc.’s opposition to the Motion will be due to be filed 

on December 22, 2016, and Plaintiff’s reply will be due to be filed on December 29, 2016. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:15-cv-01207-MCE-EFB Document 45 Filed 01/09/17 Page 2 of 3
DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 1466944.1 3

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ASSOCIATED WITH 

MOTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

DATED: December 15, 2016 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

By: /s/ Christopher B. Burton 

JAMIE P. DREHER 

CHRISTOPHER B. BURTON 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Enrique Alvarez Zardain 

DATED: December 15, 2016 HILL RIVKINS BROWN & ASSOCIATES 

By: /s/ Adam C. Brown (as authorized on 12-15-16) 

ADAM C. BROWN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TRC Holdings, Inc. 

ORDER 

The deadlines for filing an opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion Seeking Relief from 

Scheduling Order [37] is extended from December 8, 2016 to January 20, 2017, and the last day 

to submit a reply shall be continued from December 22, 2016 to January 27, 2017. While the 

Court recognizes those dates are beyond those proposed in the foregoing stipulation, they are 

consistent with the new hearing date on the Motion, which the Court sua sponte continues from 

January 12, 2017 to February 9, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom No. 7. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 6, 2017 

 

Case 2:15-cv-01207-MCE-EFB Document 45 Filed 01/09/17 Page 3 of 3