Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01099/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01099-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL MAGNAN, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-1099 GEB KJM P

vs.

DAVID L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

 /

Plaintiff filed his third amended complaint on June 1, 2006. On August 3, 2006,

the court issued a summons for defendant Gillette. Defendant Gillette still has not been served

with process. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Gillette be

dismissed from this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised 

/////

Case 2:03-cv-01099-GEB -CKD Document 65 Filed 08/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: August 16, 2007. 

1

magn1099.frs

Case 2:03-cv-01099-GEB -CKD Document 65 Filed 08/17/07 Page 2 of 2