Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06905/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06905-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1335 Interpleader Action

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KELLY JACKSON &

CHRISTIANSON, LLP

Case No. C06 06905 JW (RS) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND Page 1

Clay J. Christianson, Esq. (SBN 143024)

KELLY JACKSON & CHRISTIANSON, LLP

100 B Street, Suite 430

Santa Rosa, California 95401

(707) 578-7160

(707) 578-7469/Facsimile

Attorneys for Defendant

Debra Clasen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNION SECURITY INSURANCE,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAWN MICHELLE PETITCLERC; TARA,

PETITCLERC; and DEBRA CLASEN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. C 06 06905 JW (RS)

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO

RESPOND [LOCAL RULE 6-1]

Plaintiff Union Security Insurance, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 6-1, stipulates that

Defendant Debra Clasen shall have until February 5, 2007 to answer or otherwise respond to

plaintiff's Complaint in Interpleader.

Dated: January 19, 2007 MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP

By /s/ 

Frederic Esrailian, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Union Security Insurance

Dated: January 19, 2007 KELLY JACKSON & CHRISTIANSON, LLP

By /s/ 

Clay J. Christianson

Attorneys for Defendant

Debra Clasen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge James Ware

1/22/2007

Case 5:06-cv-06905-JW Document 14 Filed 01/22/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KELLY JACKSON &

CHRISTIANSON, LLP

Case No. C06 06905 JW (RS) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND Page 2

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a conformed

signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

Dated: January 22, 2007

 /s/ 

Clay J. Christianson

Attorneys for Defendant

Debra Clasen

Case 5:06-cv-06905-JW Document 14 Filed 01/22/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KELLY JACKSON &

CHRISTIANSON, LLP

Case No. C06 06905 JW (RS) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND Page 3

Case No. C 05 02310 MJJ U.S. District Court - Northern District 

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

[FRCivP 5(b)]

I am employed in the County of Sonoma, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and

not a party to the within entitled cause; my business address is 100 B Street, Suite 430, Santa Rosa,

California 95401. I am readily familiar with my employer's business practice for collection and

processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, such correspondence

would be deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary court of

business. 

On the date of execution of this declaration, I served the attached:

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

on the interested parties in said cause, addressed as follows: 

Brian K. Mazen, Esq. 

Frederic Esrailian, Esq.

Meserve, Mumper & Hughes LLP

300 South Grand Ave, 24 Floor th

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3185

Attorney for Plaintiff Union Security Insurance

213-620-0300

213- 625-1930 Fax

R. Donald McNeil, Esq.

Laura Liccardo, Esq.

Ferrari Ottoboni, LLP

333 W. Santa Clara St., Ste 700

San Jose, CA 95113-1716

Attorneys for Defendants Dawn Michelle

Petitclerc and Tara Petitclerc

(408) 280-0535

(408) 280-0151 Fax

 X (BY MAIL) I placed each such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, on the date

of execution of this declaration, with our office outgoing mail following ordinary business practices.

 (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused each such envelope to be delivered by hand to the

addressee(s) noted above.

 (BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document to be transmitted by Facsimile machine to the

number indicated above. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is

true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on January 22, 2007, at Santa Rosa,

California.

 /s/ 

Linda Moldrem

Case 5:06-cv-06905-JW Document 14 Filed 01/22/07 Page 3 of 3