Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01313/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01313-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN DANIELS,

Plaintiff,

v.

STU SHERMAN,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:16-cv-01313-AWI-EPG

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION

(ECF NO. 23)

Norman Gerald Daniels, III (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, commenced this action by filing a Complaint against Stu Sherman (“Defendant”), 

Warden of California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison Corcoran (“SATF”), 

on September 6, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) The Court dismissed Plaintiff’s action with prejudice on 

March 20, 2017, on res judicata grounds. On March 6, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for 

reconsideration of the Court’s order dismissing his case. (ECF No. 23.)

On August 30, 2019, Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean issued findings and 

recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration be denied. (ECF No. 

26.) 

Plaintiff was given 30 days to file objections to the findings and recommendations and did 

so on September 30, 2019. (ECF No. 27.)

Case 1:16-cv-01313-AWI-EPG Document 28 Filed 03/03/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court had conducted a de novo review of this matter. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF 

No. 23.) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2020 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01313-AWI-EPG Document 28 Filed 03/03/20 Page 2 of 2