Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02061/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02061-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK SCOGNAMILLO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON LLC,

et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C03-2061 TEH 

ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

At the July 11, 2005 hearing on motions to dismiss brought by Defendants Shell,

Longinotti, and Quattrone, Defendants relied on a recently decided Supreme Court case, Dura

Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo, 125 S. Ct. 1627 (2005), in opposing Plaintiffs’ fraud claims. 

Because no party has had an opportunity to submit written arguments regarding that case, the

Court now allows each party to file a supplemental brief, of no more than four pages,

addressing the impact of Dura Pharmaceuticals on Plaintiffs’ claims. All such briefs must be

filed on or before Friday, August 5, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED 07/21/05 /s/ 

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:03-cv-02061-TEH Document 136 Filed 07/21/05 Page 1 of 1