Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171-48/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

OKI AMERICA, INC., ET AL., 

 PLAINTIFF, 

VS. 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 DEFENDANT. 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS

UNDER SEAL 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 COUNTERCLAIMANT, 

VS. 

OKI AMERICA, INC., OKI ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRY CO., LTD., OKI DATA 

CORPORATION AND OKI DATA AMERICAS,

INC., 

 COUNTER-DEFENDANTS. 

WHEREAS, counsel for Oki and AMD have designated the documents and exhibits 

listed in Attachment A as Outside Counsel Only under the Protective Order entered by this 

Court on December 8, 2004; and 

WHEREAS, due to citation or paraphrasing of the content of these documents, 

portions of the following motions have been designated by Oki and AMD as Outside 

Counsel Only under the Protective Order entered by this Court on December 8, 2004: 

(1) AMD’s Opposition to Oki’s Motion to Strike Ratliff Reports Under Daubert

and to Oki’s Motion for Summary Judgment on AMD’s Request for Damages, which 

contains confidential testimony by expert witnesses regarding Oki’s financial information 

and/or licenses; 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 489 Filed 10/10/06 Page 1 of 8
-2- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(2) AMD’s Opposition to Oki’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of 

Infringement of the Oki ‘571 and ‘694 Patents, which contains AMD’s confidential design 

and process information and Intel confidential process and sales information; and 

(3) AMD’s Opposition to Oki’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial 

Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,495,855, which contains AMD’s 

confidential process information. 

WHEREAS, AMD now seeks to file with the Court the documents listed in 

Attachment A which have been designated by Oki and AMD as Outside Counsel Only 

under the Protective Order entered by this Court on December 8, 2004. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between all parties that the 

documents listed in Attachment A and the above-referenced motions should be filed under 

seal because they contain confidential information protected under the Court’s Protective 

Order entered December 8, 2004. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: October 5, 2006 VINSON & ELKINS, LLP 

/s/ Christopher V. Ryan 

 Christopher V. Ryan 

Attorneys for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD & 

EVANS, PLLC 

/s/ Patrick Curran 

 Patrick Curran 

Attorneys for Oki America, et al. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 489 Filed 10/10/06 Page 2 of 8
-3- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:__________________________ _______________________________________ 

 Charles R. Breyer 

 United States District Judge 

October 6, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 489 Filed 10/10/06 Page 3 of 8
-4- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in Travis County Texas, I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the 

within action; my business address is 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 78746. 

On October 5, 2006, I served the foregoing document(s) described as 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

on the interested parties in this action, at the following addresses: 

Daniel J. Bergeson 

Melinda M. Morton 

BERGESON, LLP 

303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500 

San Jose, CA 95110-2712 

Mark C. Hansen 

J.C. Rozendaal 

Patrick Curran 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD &

EVANS, PLLC 

Sumner Square 

1615 M. Street, NW, Suite 400 

Washington, DC 20036 

( ) (For Collection). By placing a true copy (copies) thereof enclosed in a sealed 

envelope(s), addressed as above, and by placing said sealed envelope(s) for collection and 

mailing on that date following ordinary business practices. I am “readily familiar” with the 

business’ practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing the U.S. 

Postal Service. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on 

that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Austin, Texas, in the ordinary course of 

business. 

( ) (Overnight Delivery). By placing a true copy(ies) thereof enclosed in a sealed 

envelope(s) or package(s) as designated by Federal Express, addressed as above, and 

depositing said envelope(s) or package(s), with delivery fees provided for, in a box 

regularly maintained by Federal Express at 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 

78746. 

(X) (Electronic Filing). In accordance with Section IX(B) of General Order No. 45 for 

cases designated in this Court for electronic case filing. 

(X) (Courtesy copy via email). By transmitting a true unredacted copy(ies) thereof to 

each of the designated counsel on the service list to the following email addresses: 

jrozendaal@khhte.com and dbergeson@be-law.com. 

( ) (Personal Delivery). I caused to be served by messenger for personal delivery that 

same day the foregoing documents in a sealed envelope to the above persons at the 

address(es) listed above. 

(X) I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on October 5, 2006 at Austin, Texas. 

/s/ Dawn Crider

753430v1 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 489 Filed 10/10/06 Page 4 of 8
-5- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTACHMENT A

AMD’s Opposition to Oki’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Motion for 

Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 6,495,855: 

1. Exhibit B – AMD’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of 

the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 6,495,855, filed September 14, 2006, which contains 

AMD’s confidential process information. 

2. Exhibit E – Document bates numbered AMD_69589-69691, which contains 

AMD’s confidential process information. 

3. Exhibit F -- Exhibit 50 to the April 20, 2006 Deposition of Scott Goad, which 

contains AMD’s confidential process information. 

4. Exhibit G -- April 20, 2006 Deposition of Scott Goad, which contains AMD’s 

confidential process information. 

5. Exhibit H -- June 28, 2006 Deposition of Carlos Salazar, which contains 

Intel’s confidential sales information. 

6. Exhibit I -- Intel Sales Records, Bates Labeled 851 INTEL000001 and 

Exhibit 6 to the June 28, 2006 Deposition of Carlos Salazar, which contains Intel’s 

confidential sales information. 

7. Exhibit J – Excerpts from the July 21, 2006 Expert Report of Dr. Dean P. 

Neikirk Regarding Invalidity of Kurachi and Sawamura Patents, which contains AMD and 

Oki’s confidential process information. 

8. Exhibit M – Excerpts from the August 14, 2006 Rebuttal Expert of Dr. 

Richard Fair Regarding Validity of U.S. Patent 5,739,571 (Kurachi), U.S. Patent 5,856,694 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 489 Filed 10/10/06 Page 5 of 8
-6- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(Kurachi), and U.S. Patent 6,495,855 (Sawamura), which contains AMD and Oki’s 

confidential process information. 

9. Exhibit N – Excerpts from the July 20, 2006 Expert Report of Dr. Richard 

Fair Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent 5,739,571 (Kurachi); U.S. Patent 5,856,694 

(Kurachi); and U.S. Patent 6,495,855 (Sawamura), which contains AMD’s and Oki’s 

confidential process information. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 489 Filed 10/10/06 Page 6 of 8
-7- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMD’s Opposition to Oki’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of 

U.S. Patent No. 4,960,732: 

1. Exhibit P – Excerpts from the July 14, 2006 report of Alan Ratliff, which 

contains Oki’s confidential financial information. 

2. Exhibit Q – Excerpts from the August 31, 2006 report of Alan Ratliff, which 

contains Oki’s confidential financial information. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 489 Filed 10/10/06 Page 7 of 8
-8- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMD’s Opposition to Oki’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement 

of the Oki ‘571 and ‘694 Patents: 

1. Exhibit G – Letter dated May 4, 2006 from Chris Ryan to J.C. Rozendaal 

which discusses AMD’s confidential process information. 

2. Exhibit S – Excerpts from the August 14, 2006 Rebuttal Expert Report on 

Damages by Richard B. Troxel which contains AMD’s confidential financial information. 

3. Exhibit T – Pages 149 and 150 from AMD’s CS-44 Design Manual, which 

contains AMD’s confidential process information. 

4. Exhibit U – Excerpts from the February 28, 2006 deposition of Stephen 

Beebe, which contains AMD’s confidential process information. 

753457v1 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 489 Filed 10/10/06 Page 8 of 8