Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00393/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00393-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO PALACIO,

Plaintiff,

v.

MENDOCINO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00393-DMR (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE

Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has 

consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, and this matter has been assigned to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 1 at 4.

On May 7, 2015, mail directed to Plaintiff by the court was returned with the following 

notations: “NIC” or not in custody; “RTS” or return to sender; and “NOT DELIVERABLE AS

ADDRESSED—UNABLE TO FORWARD.” To date, Plaintiff has not updated his address with 

the court or submitted any further pleadings in this case.

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11 a party proceeding pro se whose address 

changes while an action is pending must promptly file a notice of change of address specifying the 

new address. See L.R. 3-11(a). The court may dismiss without prejudice a complaint when: 

(1) mail directed to the pro se party by the court has been returned to the court as not deliverable, 

and (2) the court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written communication from the

pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b). 

More than sixty days have passed since the mail directed to Plaintiff by the court was 

returned as undeliverable. The court has not received a notice from Plaintiff of a new address. 

Case 4:15-cv-00393-DMR Document 7 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the 

Northern District Local Rules. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment, terminate all pending 

motions, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 16, 2015

______________________________________

DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:15-cv-00393-DMR Document 7 Filed 07/16/15 Page 2 of 2