Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-06650/USCOURTS-ca4-07-06650-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6650

ODELL REED, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JULIA LAFOON, Nurse at Brunswick Correctional

Center; she is sued in her individual and

official capacity; ALVIN E. HARRIS, Doctor at

Brunswick Correctional Center; he is sued in

his individual and official capacity; K.

RUNION, Warden at Brunswick Correctional

Center; he is sued in his individual and

official capacity; FRED SCHILLING, Health

Service Director for Virginia Department of

Corrections; he is sued in his individual and

official capacity; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director

for the Virginia Department of Corrections; he

is sued in his individual and official

capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:07-cv-00186-CMH)

Submitted: October 31, 2007 Decided: November 13, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 07-6650 Doc: 35 Filed: 11/13/2007 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

Odell Reed, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-6650 Doc: 35 Filed: 11/13/2007 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Odell Reed, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000), for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Reed v. Lafoon, No. 1:07-cv-00186-CMH (E.D. Va.

filed Mar. 28, 2007 & entered Apr. 2, 2007). We deny Reed’s motion

to submit new evidence and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-6650 Doc: 35 Filed: 11/13/2007 Pg: 3 of 3