Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04086/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04086-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

PIOTR J. GARDIAS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant.

 /

No. C04-04086 HRL

Consolidated With: C04-04768 HRL

C05-01242 HRL

C05-01833 HRL

C06-04695 HRL

INTERIM ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR DEPOSITION LIMITS

Before the court is plaintiff’s “Motion to Compel re Defendant’s Notice of Deposition”

(Docket #279) in which he requests a court order limiting his deposition to a maximum of two

hours daily, with a minimum two-day interval between deposition sessions. Before ruling on

that motion, the court would like to hear from defendant. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED

THAT:

1. No later than September 11, 2007, defendant shall file a response (not to exceed

three pages) to plaintiff’s request. The court is particularly interested in defendant’s answers to

the following:

a. Did defendant issue its deposition notice in compliance with Civil Local

Rule 30-1?

*E-FILED: 9.6.2007*

Case 5:04-cv-04086-HRL Document 285 Filed 09/06/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

b. Did defendant provide plaintiff, at least three days in advance of his

deposition, copies of those documents which are anticipated to be the

subject of examination as per this court’s August 8, 2007 order (see

Docket #257)?

2. Upon receipt of defendant’s response, briefing will close, no further briefing will

be accepted from either party, and the matter will be deemed submitted without oral argument.

Dated:

________________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

September 6, 2007

Case 5:04-cv-04086-HRL Document 285 Filed 09/06/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

A copy of this document will be mailed to:

Piotr J. Gardias 

72 Floyd Street

San Jose, CA 95110 

Plaintiff (Pro Se)

Notice has been electronically mailed to: 

Mary Susan Cain-Simon Mary.CainSimon@doj.ca.gov, David.Moss@doj.ca.gov 

Fiel D. Tigno fiel.tigno@doj.ca.gov 

Case 5:04-cv-04086-HRL Document 285 Filed 09/06/07 Page 3 of 3