Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00802/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00802-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOBBY LEE, 1:05-CV-00802-OWW-WMW-P 

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS

 AND RECOMMENDATION OF

vs. OCTOBER 6, 2005 

[Document #9]

A. K. SCRIBNER, et al., 

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION 

 OF TIME

Defendants. [Document #5] 

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. 

 On August 16, 2005, the court issued an order for plaintiff to submit a new application to

proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his trust account statement, or in the alternative, to

pay the $250.00 filing fee for this action, within thirty days of the date of service of the order. On 

September 28, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to comply with the order. Also

on September 28, 2005, plaintiff submitted a new application to proceed in forma pauperis; however,

plaintiff did not submit a certified copy of his trust account statement or pay the filing fee. 

On October 6, 2005, the Magistrate submitted findings and a recommendation to United

States District Judge Oliver W. Wanger to dismiss plaintiff’s case for failure to comply with the

court’s order of August 16, 2005. On October 24, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and

Case 1:05-cv-00802-LJO-BAM Document 11 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

recommendation, explaining his efforts to comply with the court's order. Along with the objections,

plaintiff submitted a certified copy of his trust account statement. In light of the fact that plaintiff

has now complied with the court's order, and good cause for his delay having been presented to the

court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation of October 6, 2005, are VACATED; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to comply with the court's order of August

16, 2005, is GRANTED nunc pro tunc to September 20, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 26, 2005 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

j14hj0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00802-LJO-BAM Document 11 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 2