Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00719/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00719-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C-05-00719 VRW 

LEGAL_US_W # 53718123.1 

STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME BY 

EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUT-OFF (LOCAL 

RULE 6-2) 

J. AL LATHAM, JR. (SB# 71605) 

allatham@paulhastings.com 

GAYLE A. GOLDMAN (SB# 240519) 

gaylegoldman@paulhastings.com 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

515 South Flower Street 

Twenty-Fifth Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228 

Telephone: (213) 683-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 

KATHERINE C. HUIBONHOA (SB# 207648) 

katherinehuibonhoa@paulhastings.com 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

55 Second Street 

Twenty-Fourth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 

Telephone: (415) 856-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AT&T CORP. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

Deborah Heath, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AT&T Corp., and Does 1-10, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C-05-00719 VRW 

STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME BY 

EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 

(LOCAL RULE 6-2) AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Plaintiff Deborah Heath (“Plaintiff”), acting in pro per, and Defendant AT&T 

Corp. (“Defendant”), acting by and through its counsel, stipulate to a 45-day extension of the 

current discovery cut-off date, from June 30, 2006, to August 14, 2006. There is good cause for 

the requested extension as set forth below and in the accompanying declaration of Gayle A. 

Goldman. 

Case 3:05-cv-00719-VRW Document 56 Filed 06/22/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C-05-00719 VRW 

LEGAL_US_W # 53718123.1 

-2- 

STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME BY 

EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUT-OFF (LOCAL 

RULE 6-2) 

1. Defendant has outstanding discovery differences with Plaintiff regarding 

Defendant’s First Request for Documents; 

2. On May 31, 2006, Defendant sought assistance from the Court regarding 

this document production, and on June 8, 2006, the Court ordered the parties to engage in further 

meet-and-confer; 

3. Plaintiff also has indicated that she seeks additional documents from 

Defendant; 

4. Neither party has taken any depositions regarding the pending litigation; 

5. The requested extension would allow the parties, and if necessary, the 

Court, sufficient time to resolve their discovery issues, and to allow for completion of discovery 

after such issues have been resolved; 

6. Neither party has sought an extension of the discovery cut-off previously; 

7. No trial date has been set, so extending the discovery cut-off date 45 days 

will not result in any prejudice to any case management schedule or Court calendar; 

8. Nothing in this stipulation should be interpreted to preclude either party 

from seeking further relief from the Court. 

THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY THE 

PARTIES TO THIS LITIGATION THAT THE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF BE EXTENDED 

FROM JUNE 30, 2006, TO AUGUST 14, 2006. 

Case 3:05-cv-00719-VRW Document 56 Filed 06/22/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C-05-00719 VRW 

LEGAL_US_W # 53718123.1 

-3- 

STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME BY 

EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUT-OFF (LOCAL 

RULE 6-2) 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled document. 

DATED: June _____, 2006 J. AL LATHAM, JR. 

KATHERINE C. HUIBONHOA 

GAYLE A. GOLDMAN 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

By: /s/ 

 GAYLE A. GOLDMAN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AT&T CORP. 

 

DATED: June _____, 2006 DEBORAH HEATH 

By: /s/ 

 DEBORAH HEATH 

Plaintiff 

 

 ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June _____, 2006 

By: 

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

United States District Court Judge 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Further Case Management Conference currently 

scheduled for July 25, 2006 shall be CONTINUED to September 26, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 

Parties shall file a joint case management statement one week prior to the conference. 22

Case 3:05-cv-00719-VRW Document 56 Filed 06/22/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C-05-00719 VRW 

LEGAL_US_W # 53718123.1 

-4- 

STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME BY 

EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUT-OFF (LOCAL 

RULE 6-2) 

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I am a citizen of the United States and employed in the City and County of Los Angeles, 

State of California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled 

action. My business address is 515 South Flower Street, Twenty-Fifth Floor, Los Angeles, 

California 90071-2228. 

On June 20, 2006, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: 

in a sealed envelope, postage fully paid, addressed as follows: 

STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME BY EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUT-OFF (LOCAL 

RULE 6-2) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Deborah Heath 

630 North 4th Street 

Patterson, CA 95363 

 VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL: 

VIA _______________:By delivering such document(s) to an overnight mail service or an 

authorized courier in a sealed envelope or package designated by the express service 

courier addressed to the person(s) on whom it is to be served. 

: VIA U.S. MAIL: 

I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing of 

correspondence for mailing. Under that practice such sealed envelope(s) would be 

deposited with the U.S. postal service on June 20, 2006 with postage thereon fully prepaid, 

at Los Angeles, California. 

 VIA FACSIMILE: 

The facsimile transmission report indicated that the transmission was complete and 

without error. The facsimile was transmitted to (209) 892-4444. A copy of that report, 

which was properly issued by the transmitting machine, is attached hereto. [Permitted by 

written agreement of the parties.]

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the above is true 

and correct. Executed on June 20, 2006, at Los Angeles, California. 

 /s/ 

SHARON S. MC CULLEY

Case 3:05-cv-00719-VRW Document 56 Filed 06/22/06 Page 4 of 4