Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05241/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05241-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONFIRM DEFS’ TIME TO 

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

1. 3:14-cv-05200-EMC

3:14-cv-05241-EMC

JOHN C. FISH, Jr., Bar No. 160620

jfish@littler.com

ROD M. FLIEGEL, Bar No. 168289

rfliegel@littler.com

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998

aspurchise@littler.com

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, California 94108.2693

Telephone: 415.433.1940

Facsimile: 415.399.8490 

Attorneys for Defendants

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND RASIER, 

LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED,

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly-situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; RASIER, 

LLC; HIREASE, LLC; and DOES 1-50,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:14-cv-05200-EMC

Case No. 3:14-cv-05241-EMC

STIPULATED REQUEST AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONFIRM 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO FILE 

RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Complaint Filed: November 24, 2014

Trial Date: None set.

RONALD GILLETTE, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly-situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a 

California corporation, and DOES 1-20, 

inclusive,

Defendant.

Case 3:14-cv-05241-EMC Document 52 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 4
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONFIRM DEFS’ TIME TO 

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

2. 3:14-cv-05200-EMC

3:14-cv-05241-EMC

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs RONALD GILLETTE and ABDUL KADIR 

MOHAMED and Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., RASIER, LLC and HIREASE, LLC 

(collectively, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate to confirm that the deadline for Defendants to respond 

to the complaints is July 9, 2015. This Stipulation is based on the following:

1. The Parties previously agreed in the Joint Case Management Conference Statement 

(Docket No. 34) that Defendants would have 30 days from the date of the Court’s ruling on 

Defendants’ motions to compel arbitration to respond to the complaints.

2. On June 9, 2015, the Court entered a ruling denying Defendants’ motions to compel 

arbitration.

3. Pursuant to the Parties’ agreement, and subject to this Court’s approval, Defendants 

have until July 9, 2015 to respond to the complaints.

4. This request is not made by the Parties for purposes of unnecessary delay and no 

party will be prejudiced by the granting of this request. Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. and 

Plaintiff Gillette previously stipulated to an extension of Defendant’s time to respond to the 

complaint. Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC and Plaintiff Mohamed previously 

stipulated to two extensions of Defendants’ time to respond to the complaint. Defendant Hirease, 

LLC and Plaintiff Mohamed previously stipulated to one extension of Hirease’s time to respond to 

the complaint.

THEREFORE, the parties to this Stipulation hereby stipulate and respectfully request as 

follows: that the Court confirm the cutoff for Defendants to respond to the complaints as July 9, 

2015.

Case 3:14-cv-05241-EMC Document 52 Filed 06/18/15 Page 2 of 4
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONFIRM DEFS’ TIME TO 

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

3. 3:14-cv-05200-EMC

3:14-cv-05241-EMC

Dated: June 18, 2015

/s/ Andrew M. Spurchise 

Andrew M. Spurchise

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, 

Inc. and Rasier, LLC

Dated: June 18, 2015

/s/Theodore Maya

Theodore Maya

AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC

Attorneys for Plaintiff Abdul Kadir Mohamed

Dated: June 18, 2015

/s/ Laura L. Ho

Laura L. Ho

GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & 

HO

Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Gillette

Dated: June 18, 2015

Dated: June 18, 2015

/s/Mitchell J. Freedman

Paul K. Schrieffer

Mitchell J. Freedman

P.K. SCHRIEFFER LLP

Attorneys for Defendant Hirease, LLC

/s/Sarah K. Hamilton____________________

Sarah K. Hamilton

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Attorneys for Defendant Hirease, LLC

Case 3:14-cv-05241-EMC Document 52 Filed 06/18/15 Page 3 of 4
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONFIRM DEFS’ TIME TO 

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

4. 3:14-cv-05200-EMC

3:14-cv-05241-EMC

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document.

Dated: June 18, 2015 /s/ Andrew M. Spurchise ANDREW M. SPURCHISE

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: ______________, 2015

___________________________________

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN

Firmwide:134172089.1 073208.1047

June 18

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-05241-EMC Document 52 Filed 06/18/15 Page 4 of 4