Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02904/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02904-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH THOMAS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S 06-2904 FCD EFB P

vs.

L. A. QUINN, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On April 16, 2007, the

court found that plaintiff had, on three prior occasions, brought actions in a court of the United

States that were dismissed on the ground that they were frivolous, malicious or failed to state a

claim. The court also found that plaintiff had not demonstrated that he was “under imminent

danger of serious physical injury,” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), so that he nonetheless could proceed in

forma pauperis. The court gave plaintiff 20 days either to make the showing required by 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g) or to pay the $350 filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and warned

plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. The 20-day period has expired and plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee,

attempt to make the requisite showing or otherwise respond to the court’s order.

Case 2:06-cv-02904-FCD-EFB Document 8 Filed 07/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, it hereby is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 9, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-02904-FCD-EFB Document 8 Filed 07/09/07 Page 2 of 2