Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01564/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01564-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN CALVERT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1564 DFL DAD PS

vs.

CITY OF ISLETON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

RONALD SWEPSTON,

Cross-Complainant,

vs.

STEVEN CALVERT, et al.,

Cross-Defendants.

 /

Three of the defendants removed this civil rights action from Sacramento Superior

Court. After one of the defendants appeared pro se, the matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 72-302(a).

On May 10, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

Case 2:06-cv-01564-DAD Document 49 Filed 08/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. None of the parties have filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 10, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. The motion to dismiss filed by defendants City of Isleton, City Council of Isleton,

and Jim Miller on September 26, 2006, is granted as to plaintiff’s second cause of action against

defendant Jim Miller and is otherwise denied;

3. Defendants City of Isleton, City Council of Isleton, and Jim Miller shall file their

answer to plaintiff’s first amended complaint in accordance with Rule 12(a)(4)(A) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure; and

4. Plaintiff’s October 17, 2006 motion to dismiss is granted as to both of defendant

Swepston’s cross-claims against plaintiff.

ENTERED this 1st day of August, 2007.

S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01564-DAD Document 49 Filed 08/02/07 Page 2 of 2