Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07836/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07836-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 20:1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

R.K., a minor, by and through his parents, T.K.

and C.K.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

HAYWARD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,

et al.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 06-07836 JSW

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER

On January 3, 2007, Plaintiff R.K. filed an ex parte application for a temporary

restraining order against Defendants Hayward Unified School District (“HUSD”) and Esther B.

Clark Schoool (“EBC”). Plaintiff seeks a temporary restraining order to require HUSD and

EBC to comply with the Office of Administrative Hearings’ Stay Put Order.

The Court HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on

Defendants by no later than 4:00 p.m. today, January 4, 2007. A proof of such service must be

filed by no later than January 5, 2007. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that HUSD and EBC

shall file, and hand deliver a copy to the Court’s chambers, an opposition to Plaintiff’s

application by no later than 12:00 p.m. on January 9, 2007. Plaintiff may file, and hand deliver

a copy to the Court’s chambers, a reply by no later than 12:00 p.m. on January 12, 2007.

The Court ORDERS that this matter shall be set for a hearing on Friday, January 19, 

Case 3:06-cv-07836-JSW Document 9 Filed 01/04/07 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2007 at 9:00 a.m., but reserves the right to vacate the hearing if, after considering the parties’

papers it determines that a hearing is not warranted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-07836-JSW Document 9 Filed 01/04/07 Page 2 of 2