Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-1_04-cv-01075/USCOURTS-arwd-1_04-cv-01075-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

EL DORADO DIVISION

CRYSTAL BUTLER, by next friend PLAINTIFF

DEBRA BUTLER

 

VS. CASE NO. 04-CV-1075

CITY of EL DORADO, 

EL DORADO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15, 

JAMES BISHOP and ERIC CLARK DEFENDANTS

AMENDED AND SUBSTITUTED ORDER

Before the Court is Separate Defendant El Dorado School District No. 15’s Renewed Motion

for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 69). Plaintiff has responded. (Doc. 81). Separate Defendant El

Dorado School District has replied to Plaintiffs’ response. (Doc. 85). For reasons discussed in the

Memorandum Opinion of September 11, 2006 (Doc. 88), the Court finds the motion should be and

hereby is GRANTED. The Court finds Plaintiff Crystal Butler’s claims against Separate Defendant

El Dorado School District No. 15 should be and hereby are DISMISSED with prejudice. 

Further, the Court is satisfied that no just reason for delay of entry of this judgment. This

certification is made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), for the express purpose of allowing Plaintiff

to take an appeal at this time. Delay of an opportunity to appeal would cause hardship to Plaintiff in

terms of resolution of this case and additional costs required by a separate trial. Plaintiff’s time to file

notice of appeal shall run from the date of entry of this Amended and Substituted Order. Plaintiffs

claims against Separate Defendants City of El Dorado, James Bishop and Eric Clark should be and

hereby are HELD IN ABEYANCE during the pendency of Plaintiff’s appeal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of October, 2006. 

/s/Harry F. Barnes 

Hon. Harry F. Barnes 

United States District Judge

Case 1:04-cv-01075-HFB Document 97 Filed 10/02/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>