Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04358/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04358-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 240
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 42:9601 CERCLA

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: LENGTH OF BRIEFS ON MSJ 

 

John R. Till SBN 178763 JTill@PaladinLaw.com 

Kirk M. Tracy SBN 288508 KTracy@PaladinLaw.com

PALADIN LAW GROUP® LLP

1176 Boulevard Way 

Walnut Creek, CA 94595 

Telephone: (925) 947-5700 

Facsimile: (925) 935-8488 

Counsel for Plaintiffs Ryan, 

Anne, and Reese Schaeffer 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

RYAN SCHAEFFER, an individual; ANNE 

SCHAEFFER, an individual; and REESE 

SCHAEFFER, a minor by and through her 

general guardians Ryan Schaeffer and Anne 

Schaeffer, 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

GREGORY VILLAGE PARTNERS, L.P., a 

California Partnership, et al.

 Defendants. 

 Case No. 3:13-CV-4358 JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT 

FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

PARTIAL SUMMARY AND 

DEFENDANT GREGORY VILLAGE 

PARTNERS, L.P.’S RESPONSE 

THERETO 

Local Rules 7–2(b), 7–4(b), 7–12 

Action filed: June 1, 2011 

Discovery cut-off: August 14, 2015 

Trial date: February 29, 2016 

 

The Court granted Plaintiffs Ryan, Anne, and Reese Schaeffer leave to file more than one 

motion for summary judgment or partial summary judgment against Defendant Gregory Village 

Partners, L.P. in this action. See ECF No. 113. The current deadline within which Plaintiffs must 

file such a motion is this Friday, February 27, 2015. See ECF No. 142. As Plaintiffs have been 

preparing their moving papers, it has become clear to them that they need five additional pages for 

their memorandum of points and authorities beyond the page length limit provided by Local Rule 

7–2(b) (i.e., 30 pages, instead of 25) due to the complexity of the relevant factual history of this 

action and the number and complexity of the legal issues presented by their motion. 

/ / / 

Case 3:13-cv-04358-JST Document 166 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: LENGTH OF BRIEFS ON MSJ 

-2- Case No. 3:13-CV-4358-JST

Accordingly, the parties hereto have agreed, and hereby request that the Court order, that 

Plaintiffs shall be permitted to file a memorandum of points and authorities in support of their 

motion of up to 30 pages in length and that Defendant Gregory Village Partners, L.P. shall be 

permitted to file a brief or memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion 

of up to 30 pages in length. That is, the parties hereto have agreed to each give the other and hereby 

request that the Court give them each, five additional pages for their principal brief on the motion. 

See L.R. 7–2(b), 7–4(b), 7–12. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Date: February 24, 2015 PALADIN LAW GROUP® LLP 

 /s/ 

John R. Till, Esq. 

 Counsel for Plaintiffs 

 

Date: February 24, 2015 STANZLER LAW GROUP 

 /s/ 

Jeffery Curtiss, Esq. 

Counsel for Gregory Village 

Partners, L.P. 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: _____________________ _____________________________ 

 Jon S. Tigar 

 U.S. District Judge 

 (Case No. 3:13-cv-4358 JST) 

February 27, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:13-cv-04358-JST Document 166 Filed 02/27/15 Page 2 of 2