Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00441/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00441-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - ORDER EXTENDING PVH CORP.’S 

DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

Dean Hansell (Bar No. 93831)

Michelle L. Roberts (Bar No. 292075)

1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400

Los Angeles, California 90067

Telephone: (310) 785-4600

Facsimile: (310) 785-4601

dean.hansell@hoganlovells.com

michelle.roberts@hoganlovells.com

Attorneys for Defendants

PVH Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

JODI SCOTT-GEORGE, individually and 

on behalf of other members of the general 

public similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

PVH Corporation, et al., a Delaware 

Corporation, 

Defendant.

Case No. 2:13-CV-0441 TLN DAD

ORDER EXTENDING PVH CORP.’S 

DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Filed concurrently with Ex Parte 

Application to Extend Defendant PVH 

Corp.’s May 14, 2015, Deadline to File 

Motion for Summary Judgment; 

Declarations of Dean Hansell and Michelle 

L. Roberts in Support Thereof]

Case 2:13-cv-00441-TLN-DB Document 103 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - ORDER EXTENDING PVH CORP.’S 

DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ORDER 

 The Court, having considered the Ex Parte Application to Extend Defendant PVH Corp.’s 

May 14, 2015, Deadline to File Motion for Summary Judgment and the Declarations of Dean 

Hansell and Michelle L. Roberts, finds good cause to continue the deadline for Defendant’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment and orders the following: 

 The May 14, 2015, deadline for PVH Corp. to file any Motion for Summary Judgment, 

and all associated response and hearing dates, shall be continued as follows: 

 (1) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment shall be due 28 days following the 

Court’s order on class certification. 

 (2) Plaintiffs’ Opposition shall be due 14 days after Defendant’s Motion is due. 

 (3) Defendant’s Reply shall be due 14 days after Plaintiff’s Opposition. 

 (4) The hearing shall be set for the first available hearing date following the due date 

of the Reply unless the hearing date is less than seven days after the Reply is due, in which case 

the hearing should be set for the second available hearing date after the Reply is due. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 12, 2015 

Case 2:13-cv-00441-TLN-DB Document 103 Filed 05/13/15 Page 2 of 2