Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-md-01819/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-md-01819-63/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT 

SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA (41059)

CRAIG C. CORBITT (83251)

CHRISTOPHER T. MICHELETTI (136446)

JANE YI (257893)

ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL & MASON LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 693-0700

Facsimile: (415) 693-0770

fscarpulla@zelle.com

ccorbitt@zelle.com

Lead and Liaison Counsel for 

Indirect Purchaser Class

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

IN RE STATIC RANDOM ACCESS 

MEMORY (SRAM) ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION

Case No. M:07-CV-01819-CW

MDL No. 1819

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING REVISED CASE 

MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE

This Document Relates to:

ALL ACTIONS

WHEREAS, on November 25, 2009, the Court issued an Order Granting Indirect Purchaser 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Denying Motions to Exclude Expert Opinions (Dkt. 

903) (“Order Granting Certification”), wherein the Court certified a nationwide injunctive class of 

indirect purchasers of SRAM pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(2), as well 

as twenty-seven (27) state classes of indirect purchasers of SRAM pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3), and denied Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ Daubert motions to exclude 

experts’ opinions; 

WHEREAS, on December 9, 2009, Defendants NEC, Samsung and Cypress filed a petition, 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), in the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Ninth Circuit for permission to appeal the Court’s Order Granting Certification (the “Petition”); 

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 976 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 5
2

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT 

SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, per a stipulation between the Indirect Purchaser (“IP”) Plaintiffs and 

Defendants, the Court entered a Stipulation And Order To Extend Time For Indirect Purchaser 

Plaintiffs To Submit A Proposed Form Of Class Notice And Their Experts’ Merits Reports Pending 

The Decision Of The Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals On Defendants’ Rule 23(f) Petition (Dkt. 907);

WHEREAS, on February 10, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Defendants 

Rule 23(f) Petition;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation Extending Time, the parties in all actions have met 

and conferred regarding the remaining dates in the Case Management Schedule and hereby submit to 

the Court a case schedule seeking to align the schedules in both the IP Purchaser actions and the 

Direct Purchaser actions and to accomplish just, speedy and inexpensive determination of these 

actions.

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by the undersigned counsel on behalf of the 

parties identified below, and subject to the Court’s approval, that:

The case management schedule is amended as outlined in Exhibit A, attached hereto, which 

changes the case management schedule as follows:

(1) The last day for IP Plaintiffs to serve expert reports on the merits is March 19, 2010;

(2) The last day for Defendants to serve expert reports on the merits is May 4, 2010;

(3) The last day for Plaintiffs to serve expert reply reports on the merits is June 17, 2010; 

(4) Expert discovery will close on July 8, 2010;

(5) The last day to file dispositive motions is July 15, 2010;

(6) The last day to file oppositions to dispositive motions is August 24, 2010; and,

(7) The last day to file replies to dispositive motions is September 15, 2010.

(8) The hearing date on dispositive motions is October 14, 2010.

(9) The pre-trial conference is December 14, 2010.

(10) The trial date is January 31, 2011.

 

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 976 Filed 03/22/10 Page 2 of 5
3

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT 

SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: March 8, 2010 By: /s/ Christopher T. Micheletti 

CHRISTOPHER T. MICHELETTI

ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL 

 & MASON LLP

Lead and Liaison Counsel for IndirectPurchaser Class

Dated: March 8, 2010

Dated: March 8, 2010

By:

By:

/s/ Steven N. Williams 

STEVEN N. WILLIAMS

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY

Lead And Liaison Counsel For DirectPurchaser Class

/s/ Paul Griffin

PAUL GRIFFIN

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

Attorney for Defendants 

NEC Electronics Corporation and NEC 

Electronics America, Inc. and

Liaison Counsel for Defendants

Additional Defendants and Counsel:

By /s/ Belinda Lee

BELINDA LEE

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Attorney for Defendants

Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba

America Electronic Components, Inc.

By /s/ Matthew S. Leddicotte

MATTHEW S. LEDDICOTTE (pro hac vice)

WHITE & CASE LLP

Attorney for Defendants 

Etron Technology Corporation and Etron 

Technology America, Inc.

By /s/ Lee H. Rubin

LEE H. RUBIN

MAYER BROWN LLP

Attorney for Defendant

Cypress Semiconductor Corporation

By /s/ Michael F. Tubach

MICHAEL F. TUBACH

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Attorney for Defendants

Hynix Semiconductor Inc., and

Hynix Semiconductor America Inc.

By /s/ Craig P. Seebald

CRAIG P. SEEBALD (pro hac vice)

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

Attorney for Defendants 

Renesas Technology Corp., Renesas 

Technology America, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric 

Corporation, and Mitsubishi Electric & 

By /s/ James L. McGinnis

JAMES L. MCGINNIS

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & 

HAMPTON LLP

Attorney for Defendants

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 

Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., and 

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 976 Filed 03/22/10 Page 3 of 5
4

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT 

SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Electronics USA, Inc.

By /s/ Joshua D. N. Hess

JOSHUA D. N. HESS

GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

Attorney for Defendants 

Micron Technology, Inc. and Micron 

Semiconductor Products, Inc.

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.

I, Christopher T. Micheletti, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that 

the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

 /s/ Christopher T. Micheletti 

 Christopher T. Micheletti

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2010 ______________________________________

THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Northern District of California

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 976 Filed 03/22/10 Page 4 of 5
5

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING REVISED CASE MANAGEMENT 

SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT A

Case Management Schedule

Event Direct Purchaser Case 

Schedule as per 8/18/09 

Scheduling Order

Direct and Indirect Purchaser 

Case - Stipulated and Agreed 

Date

Last date to serve expert 

reports on merits

1/25/10 3/19/10 (Indirect Only)

Last date for Defendants 

to serve expert reports on 

merits

3/26/10 5/4/10

Last date for Plaintiffs to 

serve expert reply reports 

on merits

4/26/10 6/17/10

Close of expert discovery 5/28/10 7/8/10

Last date to file 

dispositive motions. 

(Parties to file joint 

motions to the extent 

possible.)

6/10/10 7/15/10

Last date to file 

oppositions to dispositive 

motions.

7/22/10 8/24/10

Last date to file replies to 

dispositive motions.

8/12/10 9/15/10

Hearing on dispositive 

motions and Further Case 

Management Conference

9/9/10 at 2:00 p.m. 10/14/10 at 2:00 p.m.

Pre-trial Conference 11/30/10 at 2:00 p.m. 12/14/10 at 2:00 p.m.

Trial Date 1/11/11 at 8:30 a.m.

(2 months)

1/31/11 at 8:30 a.m.

(2 months)

3220353.v4

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 976 Filed 03/22/10 Page 5 of 5