Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01653/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01653-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD ERNEST ANAYA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HERRINGTON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01653-DLB (PC)

ORDER DENYING OBJECTIONS

(Doc. 17)

Plaintiff Richard Ernest Anaya (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 19, 2010,

Plaintiff filed an “Objections to Magistrate Denial of Amended Complaint.” (Doc. 17.) Plaintiff

appears to contend that the December 11, 2009 order of the United States Court of Appeals for

the Ninth Circuit (Doc. 15) would erroneously dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint. Plaintiff

then requests review of the Magistrate Judge’s order.

As previously stated, the December 11, 2009 order was issued by the Ninth Circuit, not

by the undersigned. The order from the Ninth Circuit only states that Plaintiff’s petition for writ

of mandamus and all pending motions are denied as moot. However, this would not include

Plaintiff’s amended complaint. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is not a motion before the Ninth

Circuit, but is pending before this Court for screening. Plaintiff’s objections are thus incorrect.

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s objections, filed on

January 19, 2010, are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 21, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

77e0d6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

Case 1:09-cv-01653-AWI-DLB Document 18 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 1