Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01622/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01622-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX,

Social Security Administration

SHEA LITA BOND, SBN D.C. 469103

Special Assistant United States Attorney

333 Market Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8943

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

Shea.Bond@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

VERONICA MARCOS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:09-cv-1622 SKO

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE

FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and 

REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF

PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST

DEFENDANT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective

counsel of record, that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for

further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. 

On remand, the Appeals Counsel will instruct the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) to

take the following action:

The ALJ will further evaluate the evidence. The ALJ will enter Dr. Morrison's December

21, 2008, mental capacity assessment-which was previously identified as Exhibit 23F and an

adjunct to Exhibit 19F, but not included in the exhibit record-into the record and explain whether

he is accepting or rejecting the assessment; reevaluate the claimant's credibility and RFC; and

reevaluate whether the claimant can return to his past relevant work and/or a significant number

Case 1:09-cv-01622-SKO Document 15 Filed 04/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

of other jobs given his RFC, obtaining vocational expert testimony if necessary.

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final

judgment in favor of plaintiff, and against defendant, Commissioner of Social Security, reversing

the final decision of the Commissioner.

 Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 13, 2010 /s/ Robert Christenson 

(As authorized via email)

ROBERT CHRISTENSON

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: April 9, 2010 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

/s/ Shea Lita Bond 

SHEA LITA BOND

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

Upon review, the stipulation to remand is GRANTED, and the action is REMANDED to the

Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff

Veronica Marcos and against Defendant Michael J. Astrue.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

- 2 -

Case 1:09-cv-01622-SKO Document 15 Filed 04/16/10 Page 2 of 2