Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00181/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00181-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REGGIE L. McCOY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

PAUL M. SCHULTZ, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-00181-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 5)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On March 14, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DISMISSED, and judgment be entered. These Findings and

Recommendation were served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the

date of service of that order. On April 18, 2005, Petitioner filed

objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper 

///

Case 1:05-cv-00181-OWW -DLB Document 9 Filed 06/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed March 14, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court ENTER judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00181-OWW -DLB Document 9 Filed 06/15/05 Page 2 of 2