Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03957/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03957-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

1

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ANTHONY ACOSTA,

Plaintiff,

v.

TARGET CORPORATION,

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 09-3957 JF (PVT)

ORDER RE: PARTIES PROPOSED FORM

OF PROTECTIVE ORDER

(Re: Docket No. 16)

Currently pending before the court is the parties’ “Joint Stipulation for Protective Order.”1

Based on the proposed form of order presented,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than June 29, 2010, the parties shall submit a

revised form of protective order that:

1. Authorizes the court and court personnel to view material designated

“CONFIDENTIAL” (as drafted, the order provides for filing Confidential documents

under seal, but does not provide for disclosure of such documents to the court and any

court personnel who work on the case);

2. Adds to Paragraph 20 a requirement of at least 5 days advance notice to the

designating party before any Confidential information is disclosed pursuant to a legal

requirement or court order in another case;

3. Eliminates Subparagraph c of Paragraph 22 (if information comes into a receiving

Case 5:09-cv-03957-JF Document 19 Filed 06/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

party’s legitimate knowledge independently of the production by the designating

party, they should seek agreement of the designating party, or order of the court, to

de-designate the information); and

4. Includes a signature block for the court to sign at the end of the document, rather than

as a separate order.

The parties may wish to consult the court’s model forms of protective order, available in the

Forms section of the court’s website (www.cand.uscourts.gov) for appropriate wording to meet the

foregoing requirements.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending entry of the final form of protective order, the

parties’ proposed form of order, as modified herein, shall govern the handling of confidential

information obtained through discovery or informally exchanged by the parties in connection with

this action

Dated: June 9, 2010

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:09-cv-03957-JF Document 19 Filed 06/10/10 Page 2 of 2