Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02799/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02799-44/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNLY R. BECKER, ET AL.

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, INC., ET 

AL.,

Defendants.

No. 2:10-cv-2799 TLN KJN

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Dennly R. Becker’s (“Plaintiff”) pro 

se Request for Reconsideration by the District Court of Magistrate Judge’s Ruling (ECF No. 

195). On April 16, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to modify the scheduling order to allow Plaintiff 

to file a fourth amended complaint. (See ECF No. 188.) This motion was filed seven weeks after 

the close of discovery and almost four years after the initiation of this lawsuit. Defendant Wells 

Fargo Bank, NA, Inc. opposed Plaintiff’s motion claiming that Plaintiff’s proposed amendment 

would prejudice it and require that discovery be reopened. (See ECF No. 191.) Magistrate Judge 

Kendall J. Newman (“MJ”) issued an order denying Plaintiff’s motion for a multitude of 

procedural and substantive reasons. (See Order, ECF No. 194.) Plaintiff filed the request at issue 

in response to the MJ’s order.

The Court has considered Plaintiff’s request and finds that Plaintiff has not presented 

Case 2:10-cv-02799-TLN-KJN Document 196 Filed 06/25/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

evidence that supports his contention that Magistrate Judge Newman’s findings were clearly 

erroneous or contrary to law, as required pursuant to Local Rule 303(f). See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 

72(a). Instead, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s well-reasoned decision. As such, 

Plaintiff’s request is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2014

Case 2:10-cv-02799-TLN-KJN Document 196 Filed 06/25/14 Page 2 of 2