Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01908/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01908-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OSCAR MARSHALL,

Plaintiff,

v.

PAM AHLIN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:11-cv-01908-DLB PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION AND DIRECTING CLERK OF 

THE COURT TO RE-SERVE NOVEMBER 

7, 2012 ORDER

ECF No. 11

Plaintiff Oscar Marshall (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee in the custody of the California 

Department of Mental Health (“DMH”), detained pursuant to California’s Sexually Violent 

Predators Act (“SVPA”), Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 6600, et seq. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and 

in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)and finds that 

it states a cognizable claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants F. Moreno and R. 

Medina for violation of the Fourth Amendment and excessive force in violation of the Due Process 

Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. On November 7, 2012, the Court issued an order finding

service of the complaint appropriate and forwarding documents to Plaintiff for completion and 

return. On January 8, 2013, the Court issued an order to show cause why this action should not be 

dismissed for failure to obey the Court’s November 7, 2012 Order. On January 18, 2013, Plaintiff 

filed a motion requesting that the Court re-serve the November 7, 2012 Order. Plaintiff contends 

that he never received the order.

Case 1:11-cv-01908-LJO-DLB Document 12 Filed 02/19/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The order to show cause, issued January 8, 2013, is discharged;

2. Plaintiff’s motion, filed January 18, 2013, is granted;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-serve the Court’s November 7, 2012 Order, filed 

at ECF No. 9; and

4. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order by which to 

comply with the November 7, 2012 Order. Failure to timely comply will result in 

dismissal of the action for failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2013 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

3b142a

Case 1:11-cv-01908-LJO-DLB Document 12 Filed 02/19/13 Page 2 of 2