Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00569/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00569-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH R. HUSKEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

PAM AHLIN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:12-cv-00569-AWI-SKO (PC)

ORDER RELIEVING DEFENDANTS OF 

OBLIGATION TO FILE RESPONSE TO 

AMENDED COMPLAINT PENDING 

FURTHER ORDER AND DENYING 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS 

MOOT

(Doc. 57)

Plaintiff Kenneth R. Huskey, a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 

filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 12, 2012. On August 13, 2014, 

the Court granted Defendants Ahlin, Brown, Craig, and Young’s motion to dismiss, dismissed 

Plaintiff’s claims arising from the failure to provide all-cotton t-shirts and any ill-fitting clothing 

with prejudice, and dismissed Plaintiff’s remaining substantive due process claims regarding 

medically necessary clothing with leave to amend. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff filed an 

amended complaint on September 15, 2014, and on October 1, 2014, Defendants filed a motion 

seeking an extension of time to file a response to Plaintiff’s amended complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 

15(a)(3).

///

///

///

Case 1:12-cv-00569-AWI-SKO Document 58 Filed 10/02/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In light of the statutory screening directive, Defendants are relieved of their obligation to 

file a response to Plaintiff’s amended complaint pending further order, and their motion for an 

extension of time is HEREBY DENIED as moot. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

15(a)(3). Plaintiff’s amended complaint will be screened in due course. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 2, 2014 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00569-AWI-SKO Document 58 Filed 10/02/14 Page 2 of 2