Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01035/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01035-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CYNTHIA HOPSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

7-ELEVEN INCORPORATED, dba, 7-

Eleven Store #20298, RYAN LIMITED 

LIABILITY COMPANY, as an entity, 

adn dba 7-Eleven Store #20298, 

SACHDEVA PROPERTIES LIMITED 

LIABILITY COMPANY, DOES 1-10, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 1:15-CV-1035 DAD MJS 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED 

FOR FAILURE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE 

DOCUMENTS AS DIRECTED BY PRIOR 

COURT ORDER

(ECF No. 18)

On October 14, 2015, Plaintiff, Cynthia Hopson, notified the Court that this matter 

had settled. (ECF No. 17.) 

On the same date, October 14, 2015, the Court ordered that all dispositive 

documents be submitted within 60 days of the date of this Order pursuant to the 

provisions of Local Rule 160 (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16). The Court noted that any request for 

an extension of time to comply with this Order had to be filed before expiration of the 

time set and include good cause for the alleged inability to comply. Finally, the Court 

noted that failure to comply with the order could be grounds for the imposition of 

sanctions.

As of this date, over sixty (60) days have passed and the Court has not received 

Case 1:15-cv-01035-DAD-MJS Document 20 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

settlement documents as required by the October 14, 2015 order. Nor has the Court 

received a request for an extenstion of time of the filing deadline. 

Local Rule 110 provides: “Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these 

Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any 

and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” 

Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to, within fourteen (14) days of service of this 

order, SHOW CAUSE why appropriate sanctions should not be imposed for failing to 

comply with a court order. Alternatively, the Court may discharge the order to show 

cause if Plaintiff files dispostive documents within fourteen days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2016 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01035-DAD-MJS Document 20 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 2