Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-01491/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-01491-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jabir Dahir Abdulle, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Michael Donahue, 

Respondent.

No. CV-15-01491-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

Pending before the Court is the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of Petitioner 

Jabir Dahir Abdulle, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and Magistrate Judge Deborah 

Fine’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R) (Docs. 1, 10). The R&R recommends that 

the Court dismiss the Petition as being moot. Doc. 10 at 3. The Magistrate Judge 

advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that 

failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review 

of the R&R. Id. at 3 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, 6(a), 6(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 

328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)). 

 The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to 

review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 

(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is 

not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must 

determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly 

Case 2:15-cv-01491-GMS Document 12 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is welltaken. The Court will accept the R&R and dismiss the Petition as being moot. See 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole 

or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; 

receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”). 

IT IS ORDERED:

 1. Magistrate Judge Fine’s R&R (Doc. 10) is accepted. 

 2. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is dismissed as 

being moot. 

 3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action and enter judgment 

accordingly. 

 4. Because this case arises under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, no ruling on a certificate 

of appealability is required. 

 Dated this 7th day of January, 2016. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-01491-GMS Document 12 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 2