Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05572/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05572-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PACIFIC CHOICE SEAFOOD COMPANY, 

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PENNY PRITZKER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-05572-HSG 

ORDER REGARDING REQUEST TO 

EXPAND MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT PAGE LIMITS

Re: Dkt. No. 54

On August 22, 2016, the parties filed a joint case management statement requesting that 

the Court expand the page limits on the opening and reply briefs to their cross-motions for 

summary judgment. Dkt. No. 54 ¶ 21.

The Court hereby GRANTS the request with these modifications:

 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment will be limited to 35 pages;

 Defendants’ Combined Response and Cross-Motion will be limited to 35 pages;

 Plaintiffs’ Combined Response and Reply will be limited to 20 pages; and

 Defendants’ Reply will be limited to 10 pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

8/31/2016

Case 4:15-cv-05572-HSG Document 57 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 1