Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-00039/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-00039-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:0160 Labor: NLRA - Prevention of Unfair Labor Practices

---

1 15cv0039-GPC(JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OLIVIA GARCIA, Regional Director 

of Region 21 of the National Labor 

Relations Board, for and on behalf of 

the NATIONAL LABOR 

RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner,

v.

HIGH FLYING FOODS, 

 

 Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15CV0039-GPC(JLB)

ORDER GRANTING JOINT 

MOTION/STIPULATION OF 

DISMISSAL

Judge: Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel

Courtroom: 2D

No hearing requested or required

Case 3:15-cv-00039-GPC-JLB Document 29 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 3
2 15cv0039-GPC(JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Background

1. On January 8, 2015, Petitioner Olivia Garcia, Regional Director of 

Region 21 of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), for and on behalf of the 

NLRB, petitioned the Court for a temporary injunction in this matter under 29 

U.S.C. Sec. 160(j), pending final determination of the charges filed with the 

NLRB by UNITE HERE! Local 30 (Union), against High Flying Foods 

(Respondent).

2. On February 12, 2015, the Court: (a) issued its Order granting the 

petition (in part) for temporary injunction, and also (b) issued the temporary 

injunction. The Court’s Order is reported at 2015 WL 773054 (S.D. Cal. 2015).

3. On September 30, 2016, the NLRB issued its Order on the unfair

labor practice complaint underlying the petition for injunction, adopting the 

findings and conclusions of the Administrative Law Judge as contained in his 

Decision.

4. The issuance of the NLRB’s Order renders the injunction proceeding 

moot. Johansen ex rel. NLRB v. Queen Mary Restaurant Corp., 522 F.2d 6 (9th 

Cir. 1975). Accordingly, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure, on October 19, 2016, the parties filed a Joint 

Motion/Stipulation of Dismissal of this action with the Court.

5. Pursuant to Section 2(f)(4) of the Electronic Case Filing 

Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual of the Southern District of 

California, the parties’ Joint Motion/Stipulation of Dismissal was filed as a joint 

motion, as it is subject to the Court’s approval. 

///

///

///

///

Case 3:15-cv-00039-GPC-JLB Document 29 Filed 10/20/16 Page 2 of 3
3 15cv0039-GPC(JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Court approval

Based on the above, the Court hereby issues this Order approving the Joint 

Motion/Stipulation of Dismissal, under the terms as set forth in the Joint 

Motion/Stipulation of Dismissal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 20, 2016

Case 3:15-cv-00039-GPC-JLB Document 29 Filed 10/20/16 Page 3 of 3