Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_13-cv-01052/USCOURTS-azd-4_13-cv-01052-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

RICHARD SHUPE,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, 

INC.,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 13-1052-TUC-CKJ (BPV)

ORDER

On December 13, 2013, Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco issued a Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 22) in which he recommended that the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4)

be denied as moot, the Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 13) be granted with

leave to amend, the Motions to Remand (Docs. 5 and 12) be denied, and the Motion to

Amend or Correct the Amended Complaint (Doc. 19) be denied. The magistrate judge

advised the parties that written objections to the Report and Recommendation were to be

filed within fourteen days of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). No objection has been filed.

This Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Further, under 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1), if a party makes a timely objection to a magistrate judge's recommendation, then

this Court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and

recommendation] to which objection is made." The statute does not "require [] some lesser

review by [this Court] when no objections are filed." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50

(1985). Rather, this Court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that

Case 4:13-cv-01052-JAS-EJM Document 23 Filed 01/14/14 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

is not the subject of an objection." Id. at 149. Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed and

considered the Report and Recommendation and finds it well-supported and well-taken.

Amended Complaint

The Court, as discussed by the magistrate judge, has provided the reasons for the

dismissal so Plaintiff can make an intelligent decision whether to file a Third Amended

Complaint. See Bonanno v. Thomas, 309 F.2d 320 (9th Cir. 1962); Eldridge v. Block, 832

F.2d 1132 (9th Cir. 1987). Additionally, Plaintiff should take notice that if he fails to timely

comply with every provision of this Order, this action will be dismissed pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258 (9th Cir.) (district court may

dismiss action for failure to comply with any order of the Court), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 915

(1992).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED.

2. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is DENIED AS MOOT.

3. The Motions to Remand (Docs. 5 and 12) are DENIED.

4. The Motion to Amend or Correct the Amended Complaint (Doc. 19) is

DENIED.

5. The Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 13) is GRANTED WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of filing this Order

to file a Third Amended Complaint.

6. Any Third Amended Complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety and

may not incorporate any part of the prior complaints or subsequent pleadings by reference.

Any Third Amended Complaint submitted by Plaintiff shall be clearly designated as a Third

Amended Complaint on the face of the document. Any Third Amended Complaint shall

comply with the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a), 10(a), and 11(a).

Case 4:13-cv-01052-JAS-EJM Document 23 Filed 01/14/14 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 3 -

7. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter a judgment of dismissal, without

prejudice, without further notice to Plaintiff, if Plaintiff fails to file a Third Amended

Complaint within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Order. 

8. A clear, legible copy of every pleading or other document filed SHALL

ACCOMPANY each original pleading or other document filed with the Clerk for use by the

District Judge/Magistrate Judge to whom the case is assigned. See L.R.Civ. 5.4. Failure to

submit a copy along with the original pleading or document will result in the pleading

or document being stricken without further notice to Plaintiff.

8. At all times during the pendency of this action, Plaintiff shall immediately

advise the Court of any change of address and its effective date. Such notice shall be

captioned "NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS". The notice shall contain only

information pertaining to the change of address and its effective date. The notice shall not

include any motions for any other relief. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of the Notice of Change

of Address on all served opposing parties. Failure to file a NOTICE OF CHANGE OF

ADDRESS may result in the dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). 

DATED this 13th day of January, 2014.

Case 4:13-cv-01052-JAS-EJM Document 23 Filed 01/14/14 Page 3 of 3