Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04435/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04435-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR SEC'S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REYES AND JENSEN'S RULE 56(f) MOTION; NO. C 06-04435 CRB

RICHARD MARMARO (Bar No. 91387)

rmarmaro@skadden.com

JACK DICANIO (Bar No. 138782)

jdicanio@skadden.com

GARRETT J. WALTZER (Bar No. 130764)

gwaltzer@skadden.com

THOMAS V. CHRISTOPHER (Bar No. 185928)

tchristo@skadden.com

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP

525 University Avenue, Suite 1100

Palo Alto, California 94301

Tel: (650) 470-4500

Fax: (650) 470-4570

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GREGORY L. REYES, ANTONIO CANOVA, and

STEPHANIE JENSEN,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. C-06-4435 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REVISING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’

MOTIONS UNDER FEDERAL RULE

OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 56(f)

Date: N/A

Time: N/A

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Courtroom: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MICHAEL J. BYRD,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. C-07-4223 CRB

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 394 Filed 06/05/08 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR REYES AND JENSEN'S

RULE 56(f) MOTIONS; NO. C 06-04435 CRB

- 1 -

STIPULATION

Plaintiff in the above-captioned case, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the

“Commission”), and defendants Gregory L. Reyes and Stephanie Jensen, by and through their

respective counsel (collectively, “the Defendants”), hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS the Commission filed a motion for summary judgment against the Defendants

on Friday, May 9, 2008;

WHEREAS the Commission and the Defendants previously stipulated to and this Court

ordered a briefing schedule stating, inter alia, that Mr. Reyes and Ms. Jensen would file motions

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f), if any, by Wednesday, June 4, 2008; the Commission

would file its opposition to any Rule 56(f) motions by Friday, June 20, 2008; and the Defendants

wouldfiletheirrepliestotheCommission’s opposition to any Rule 56(f) motions by Friday, June

27, 2008;

WHEREAS the Commission and the Defendants are now in agreement that Mr. Reyes and

Ms. Jensen shall file motions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f), if any, by Friday, June

6, 2008, and that the dates for the Commission’s opposition to any Rule 56(f) Motions and the

Defendants’repliestotheCommission’soppositiontoanyRule56(f)Motionswillremain

unchanged;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:

1. The Defendants will file their Rule 56(f) Motions, if any, by Friday, June 6, 2008;

2. The dates for the Commission’s opposition to any Rule 56(f) Motions and the

Defendants’repliestotheCommission’soppositiontoanyRule56(f)Motionswill remain

unchanged.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 394 Filed 06/05/08 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR REYES AND JENSEN'S

RULE 56(f) MOTIONS; NO. C 06-04435 CRB

- 2 -

June 4, 2008 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

/s/ Susan Fleischmann

Susan Fleischmann

Attorney for Securities and Exchange Commission

June 4, 2008 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE,

MEAGHER & FLOM LLP

/s/ Richard Marmaro

Richard Marmaro

Attorney for Gregory L. Reyes

June 4, 2008 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

/s/ Jan Nielsen Little

Jan Nielsen Little

Attorneys for Stephanie Jensen

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________________

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

June 4, 2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 394 Filed 06/05/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR REYES AND JENSEN'S

RULE 56(f) MOTIONS; NO. C 06-04435 CRB

- 3 -

206446.01-San Francisco Server 1A - MSW

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: June 4, 2008 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP

By: /s/ Richard Marmaro

Richard Marmaro

Attorneys for Defendant Gregory L. Reyes

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 394 Filed 06/05/08 Page 4 of 4