Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00964/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00964-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1 STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND

ORDER AS MODIFIED

Case No. C 04:06-cv-00964-CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

David J. Miclean (#115098) 

Lisa M. Martens (#195824) 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 

Redwood City, CA 94063 

Telephone: (650) 839-5070 

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NEILMED PRODUCTS, INC. 

Stephen C. Beuerle (#181990) 

John L. Roberts (#208927) 

Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP 

530 B Street, Suite 2100 

San Diego, CA 94105 

Telephone: (619) 515-3267 

Facsimile: (619) 744-5467 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MED-SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

NeilMed Products, Inc., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Med-Systems, Inc., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. C 04:06-cv-00964-CW 

STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY 

SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER AS 

MODIFIED 

 Hon. Claudia Wilken 

Case 4:06-cv-00964-CW Document 37 Filed 03/26/07 Page 1 of 4
2 STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND

ORDER AS MODIFIED

Case No. C 04:06-cv-00964-CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between Plaintiff NeilMed 

Products, Inc. (“NeilMed”) and Defendant Med-Systems, Inc. (“Med-Systems”), by and through 

their respective counsel of record, that there exists good cause under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) for the 

Court to modify the scheduling order. Specifically, the parties wish to extend the discovery 

deadlines by several weeks—and the dispositive motion hearing date by one week—in order to 

allow the parties to finalize a settlement of this matter. The proposed extension will not affect the 

final pretrial conference or trial dates. 

If the parties are unable to reach a settlement, the parties will resume discovery. This is the 

first motion to modify the scheduling order filed by the parties concerning the above-captioned 

action. The parties believe that no further extensions will be required. 

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court modify the certain deadlines 

entered in this case on September 27, 2006, as set forth in the table below. All deadlines sought to 

be postponed are in bold-faced type and underlined. The remaining deadlines not sought to be 

postponed are also included in the table for ease of reference. 

Event Original Date New Date

Completion of fact discovery (with 

service of all fact discovery 

requests to occur on a date early 

enough to allow for response prior 

to this deadline) 

April 27, 2007 May 18, 2007

Disclosure of identities and reports 

of expert witnesses 

May 25, 2007 June 15, 2007

Rebuttal expert reports deadline June 22, 2007 July 13, 2007

Close of Expert Discovery July 13, 2007 July 27, 2007

All case-dispositive motions to be 

heard at 2:00 p.m. on or before: 

September 21, 2007 September 27, 2007

Final Pretrial Conference at 1:30 

p.m. on: 

November 30, 2007 November 30, 2007 

A 4 day Jury Trial will begin at 

8:30 a.m. on: 

December 10, 2007 December 10, 2007 

Case 4:06-cv-00964-CW Document 37 Filed 03/26/07 Page 2 of 4
3 STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND

ORDER AS MODIFIED

Case No. C 04:06-cv-00964-CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 22, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /Lisa M. Martens/ 

 David J. Miclean 

Lisa M. Martens 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NEILMED PRODUCTS, INC. 

Dated: March 22, 2007 PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & 

SAVITCH LLP 

By: /John L. Roberts/ 

 John L. Roberts 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MED-SYSTEMS, INC. 

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from John L. 

Roberts. 

Dated: March 22, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /Lisa M. Martens/ 

 David J. Miclean 

Lisa M. Martens 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NEILMED PRODUCTS, INC. 

Case 4:06-cv-00964-CW Document 37 Filed 03/26/07 Page 3 of 4
4 STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND

ORDER AS MODIFIED

Case No. C 04:06-cv-00964-CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 3/26/07 

Dated: _______________________ _________________________________________ 

 Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 Judge Of The United States District Court 

50406834.doc 

Case 4:06-cv-00964-CW Document 37 Filed 03/26/07 Page 4 of 4