Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04035/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04035-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ROE, a MINOR, by MAURICIO

RODRIGUES BORREGO, his guardian ad

litem, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

THOMAS F. WHITE, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 03-04035 CRB

ORDER RE: EX PARTE

APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER

SEAL

Now pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ application to file documents under seal. 

In particular, plaintiffs seek to file under seal in their entirety all documents related to their

counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. The motion is DENIED. Civil Local Rule

79-5 provides that counsel seeking to file an entire document under seal must file a

declaration “establishing that the entire document is sealable.” Counsel’s declaration does

not purport to establish such fact; instead, he merely attests that such documents “refer to

matters which may be deemed to be subject to the confidentiality provisions” of the

settlement agreement. Where, as here, only portions of a document are sealable, counsel must 

//

//

//

Case 3:03-cv-04035-CRB Document 584 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2003\4035\orderresealing.2.wpd 2

comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 1, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-04035-CRB Document 584 Filed 08/01/07 Page 2 of 2