Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02254/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02254-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROP.] ORD. SHORT. TIME PLFS’ CROSS MTN. TO STRIKE DEF’S MTN. TO DISMISS

Robert S. Green (State Bar No. 

Jenelle Welling (State Bar No. 209480)

Charles D. Marshall (State Bar No. 236444)

GREEN WELLING LLP

595 Market Street, Suite 2750

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 477-6700

Facsimile: (415) 477-6710

cand.uscourts@classcounsel.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

San Jose Division

MICHAEL BROTHERS, an individual;

RICHARD L. WISE, an individual; and

WORLDWIDE PCE, LLC, a Massachusetts

limited liability corporation; on behalf of

themselves and all others similarly situated

Plaintiffs,

v.

Hewlett-Packard Co., 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C-06-2254 RMW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO

BRIEF AND TO HEAR PLAINTIFFS’

CROSS MOTION TO STRIKE

PORTIONS OF DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 5:06-cv-02254-RMW Document 40 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROP.] ORD. SHORT. TIME PLFS’ CROSS MTN. TO STRIKE DEF’S MTN. TO DISMISS 1

WHEREAS, on September 21, 2006, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’

Amended Complaint to be heard on October 27, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. before this Court.

WHEREAS Defendant attached to its Motion to Dismiss as Exhibit A what it represents

to be a true and correct copy of Plaintiff Wise’s HP Care Pack Service Agreement. HP based

arguments in its Motion to Dismiss on the same.

WHEREAS on October 6, 2006, in addition to filing an opposition to Defendant’s

Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs also filed a Cross Motion to Strike Portions of Defendants’ Motion

to Dismiss. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike claims that Defendant’s Exhibit A is (a) not a true and

correct copy of what it purports to be, (b) is substantively different from the actual document,

and (c) must be stricken along with all arguments in reliance on the Exhibit.

WHEREAS Plaintiffs requested that Defendant withdraw its Exhibit A and arguments in

reliance, but Defendant declined, reserving the right to do so later.

WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike bears directly on issues in Defendant’s Motion to

Dismiss, and both parties agree that the motions should be heard together at the already

scheduled October 27, 2006 Motion to Dismiss hearing.

Case 5:06-cv-02254-RMW Document 40 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROP.] ORD. SHORT. TIME PLFS’ CROSS MTN. TO STRIKE DEF’S MTN. TO DISMISS 2

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant, through their respective counsel of

record, hereby stipulate as follows:

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, subject to the Court’s approval, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike

Portions of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be heard at the 9:00 a.m., October 27, 2006,

hearing already scheduled for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. The parties further stipulate,

subject to the Court’s approval, to an abbreviated briefing schedule allowing Defendant until

October 13, 2006, to oppose the Motion to Strike (or withdraw its Exhibit A) and Plaintiff until

October 20, 2006, to reply in support.

DATED: October 11, 2006. Respectfully submitted,

GREEN WELLING LLP

By: ___________/s/______________

Charles D. Marshall

Robert S. Green

Jenelle Welling

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Michael Brothers, Richard L. Wise and

Worldwide PCE, LLC

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

By: ___________/s/______________

John F. Schultz (pro hac vice)

Howard Holderness

Thomas R. Green

Attorneys for Defendant

Hewlett-Packard Co.

Case 5:06-cv-02254-RMW Document 40 Filed 10/13/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROP.] ORD. SHORT. TIME PLFS’ CROSS MTN. TO STRIKE DEF’S MTN. TO DISMISS 3

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Portions of Defendant’s Motion

to Dismiss shall be heard at the 9:00 a.m., October 27, 2006, hearing already scheduled for

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant shall file any opposition, or withdraw its Exhibit A,

on or before October 13, 2006, and Plaintiffs shall file any reply in support of their motion on or

before October 20, 2006.

DATED: October 13, 2006, _________________________________

RONALD M. WHYTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-02254-RMW Document 40 Filed 10/13/06 Page 4 of 4