Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00459/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00459-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Jesus A. Garcia (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action currently proceeds on 

Plaintiff’s claims for deliberate indifference to his health and safety in violation of the Eighth 

Amendment against Defendants J. Mejia and J. Faure. 

On May 4, 2016, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint under Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim.1(ECF No. 15.) The notice of motion that 

accompanied the motion expressly notified Plaintiff that his response to the motion to dismiss must be 

filed not more than twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of that motion. Local Rule 230(l). 

 

1 The motion was originally filed by Defendant Faure, and was joined by Defendant Mejia. (ECF No. 

27.)

JESUS A. GARCIA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00459-BAM (PC)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS

(ECF No. 25)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

Case 1:14-cv-00459-AWI-BAM Document 28 Filed 06/08/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Thus, Plaintiff’s response to that motion was due on or before May 31, 2016. That date has passed, 

and Plaintiff has not yet filed any response. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a 

statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff is warned 

that the failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss this action, 

with prejudice, for failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 7, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00459-AWI-BAM Document 28 Filed 06/08/16 Page 2 of 2