Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-02987/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-02987-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

Stipulation & [Proposed] Order of Dismissal Case No.: 4:14-cv-02987 (DMR)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARC N. BERNSTEIN (SBN 145837)

mbernstein@blgrp.com

AMY L. KASHIWABARA (SBN 210562)

akashiwabara@blgrp.com

THE BUSINESS LITIGATION GROUP, P.C.

555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1650

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415.765.6633

Facsimile: 415.283.4804

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim Defendant MTR Western, LLC 

VAL D. HORNSTEIN (SBN 133726)

val@hornsteinlaw.com

MATTHEW R. HARRISON (SBN 267477)

mharrison@hornsteinlaw.com

HORNSTEIN LAW

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2860

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415.454.1490

Facsimile: 415.520.0414

Attorneys for Defendants and

Counterclaimants Tower Tours, LLC 

and Hagen Choi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

MTR WESTERN LLC, a Washington 

Corporation 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim 

Defendant,

vs.

TOWER TOURS, LLC, a California 

Corporation, and HAGEN CHOI, an 

individual, 

Defendants and Counterclaimants.

Case No. 4:14-cv-02987 (DMR)

STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Case 4:14-cv-02987-DMR Document 50 Filed 02/10/15 Page 1 of 3 Case4:14-cv-02987-DMR Document49 Filed02/10/15 Page1 of 3
Stipulation & [Proposed] Order of Dismissal 1 Case No.: 4:14-cv-02987 (DMR)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

STIPULATION

Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, MTR Western, LLC (MTR) and 

Defendants and Counterclaimants Tower Tours, LLC and Hagen Choi (jointly and 

severally, Defendants), along with The Choi Family 2006 Trust u/t/a dated April 25, 

2006 (Trust), have entered into a binding Confidential Settlement Agreement

(Agreement). These parties have also entered a Stipulation for Entry of Judgment 

(Stipulation for Judgment), which consents to the Court’s entry of judgment in the 

event of a breach of the settlement terms. 

The Agreement also provides that this Court will retain jurisdiction both to 

enforce the terms of the Agreement and, in the event of a breach, to enter the 

judgment consented to in the Stipulation for Judgment. The Agreement also invokes 

California Civil Procedure Code section 664.6 as an additional mechanism for the 

Court’s enforcement of the Agreement.

MTR and the Defendants now wish to end this litigation, and they request the 

Court to dismiss it in its entirety, with prejudice, but with the Court retaining 

jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ Agreement and Stipulation for Judgment. 

MTR and DEFENDANTS SO STIPULATE.

DATED: February 10, 2015 THE BUSINESS LITIGATION GROUP, P.C.

By: /s/ Marc N. Bernstein 

 Marc N. Bernstein

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim Defendant MTR

Western, LLC

Case 4:14-cv-02987-DMR Document 50 Filed 02/10/15 Page 2 of 3 Case4:14-cv-02987-DMR Document49 Filed02/10/15 Page2 of 3
Stipulation & [Proposed] Order of Dismissal 2 Case No.: 4:14-cv-02987 (DMR)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: February 10, 2015 HORNSTEIN LAW 

By: /s/ Matthew R. Harrison 

 Matthew R. Harrison

Attorneys for Defendants and 

Counterclaimants Tower Tours, LLC and

Hagen Choi

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Based on the parties’ stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED

that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. 

This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement 

Agreement, including through application of California Code of Civil Procedure 

section 664.6, and, in the event of a breach or default under the terms of the 

Settlement Agreement or Stipulation for Judgment, to enter judgment pursuant to 

the Stipulation for Judgment.

The parties are to bear their own fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:____________, 2015 ________________________________

 Donna M. Ryu

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been obtained from Matthew R. Harrison. 

Dated: February 10, 2015 __ __ /s/ Marc N. Bernstein 

Marc N. Bernstein

Case4:14-cv-02987-DMR Document49 Filed02/10/15 Page3 of 3

Feb. 10

Case 4:14-cv-02987-DMR Document 50 Filed 02/10/15 Page 3 of 3