Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923-62/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

DECHERT LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; 

CASE NO. C-04-03923 MMC 12371921.1

Chris Scott Graham (State Bar No. 114498) 

chris.scott.graham@dechert.com 

Michael N. Edelman (State Bar No. 180948) 

michael.edelman@dechert.com 

DECHERT LLP 

1117 California Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: 650.813.4800 

Facsimile: 650.813.4848 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

SYNOPSYS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation,

Plaintiff, 

v.

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, a 

Delaware corporation, 

Defendant.

Case No. C-04-03923 MMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO 

FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS 

AND RELATED CROSS ACTION 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 967 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 3
DECHERT LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; 

CASE NO. C-04-03923 MMC 12371921.1

1

WHEREAS, the deadline to file dispositive motions in the instant action is January 27, 

2006, and;

WHEREAS, there is now pending, and under submission to this Honorable Court a large 

number of motions, including motions for summary judgment, motions to amend pleadings and 

a motion for reconsideration, where the outcome of a number of the motions could have a 

significant impact on the number and/or nature of additional dispositive motions potentially 

available to the parties which the parties could file in the instant action by January 27, 2006, 

and;

WHEREAS, the parties collectively anticipate filing an additional seven to ten 

dispositive motions depending on the manner in which this Honorable Court rules on the 

matters currently under submission, but desire to avoid unnecessarily burdening this Honorable 

Court or expending monies on litigating issues that many be removed from the action, and; 

WHEREAS, the parties are currently scheduled to appear before this Honorable Court 

on February 3, 2006 for a further status conference; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Synopsys and 

Magma to request this Honorable Court to continue the deadline for filing dispositive motions 

through and including February 10, 2006. 

The parties reserve their rights to file dispositive motions before February 10, 2006, 

consistent with this Court’s previous orders and the local rules. 

Dated: January 25, 2006 DECHERT LLP 

By:/s/ Chris Scott Graham 

Chris Scott Graham 

Michael N. Edelman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

SYNOPSYS, INC. 

Dated: January 25, 2006 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By:/s/ Mark Miller 

George Riley 

Mark Miller 

Christopher Catalano 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 967 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 3
DECHERT LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; 

CASE NO. C-04-03923 MMC 12371921.1

2

I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has 

been obtained from counsel of record for Magma Design Automation. 

Dated: January 25, 2006 DECHERT LLP 

By:/s/ Chris Scott Graham 

Chris Scott Graham 

Michael N. Edelman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

SYNOPSYS, INC. 

ORDER

In light of the foregoing Stipulation and request of the parties, and good cause existing; 

IT IS SO ORDERED,

DATED: , 2006 

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

January 25

with the exception that no further motions shall be filed until

after the February 3, 2006 status conference.

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 967 Filed 01/26/06 Page 3 of 3