Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-03587/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-03587-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Conversion

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DONALD NORMAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTERSANGO, LLC, ET AL., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-03587-YGR 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO 

PROSECUTE

Plaintiff Donald Norman brings this derivative shareholder action against defendants. 

(Dkt. No. 35, the “FAC”.) On October 25, 2016, defendants Intersango, LLC and Patrick 

Strateman each filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 

(Dkt. Nos. 36, 37.) Plaintiff’s response was due on November 8, 2016, and any replies would 

have been due on November 15, 2016. Plaintiff has yet to file a response. As a result, the Court is 

considering dismissing plaintiff’s lawsuit for “failure to prosecute,” that is, a failure to meet 

deadlines to keep the lawsuit moving forward. 

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not dismiss the case 

for failure to prosecute. The Court SETS a hearing on this Order for Friday, December 2, 2016 at 

2:00 p.m., in the Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1. Not later 

than Friday, November 25, 2016, plaintiff must file either: (i) responses to the motions to 

dismiss; or (ii) a written response to this Order to Show Cause, indicating why the case should not 

be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to comply will be deemed an admission that 

plaintiff does not intend to prosecute, and his case will be dismissed without prejudice. If 

compliance is complete, the Court may vacate the hearing on this Order and the plaintiff need not 

appear. If plaintiff files responses to the motions to dismiss by November 25, 2016, defendants’ 

Case 4:16-cv-03587-YGR Document 42 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

replies will be due seven (7) days thereafter. 

The Court also VACATES the hearing on defendants’ motions to dismiss currently set for 

November 29, 2016, to be reset if briefing on such motions is complete. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 21, 2016 

______________________________________ 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:16-cv-03587-YGR Document 42 Filed 11/21/16 Page 2 of 2