Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01728/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01728-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

MILLER, KAPLAN, ARASE & CO, LLP,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-01728-MMC 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION 

IN LIMINE NO. 7

Re: Dkt. No. 196

To the extent the motion seeks an order excluding all evidence pertaining to 

discussions regarding a possible sales contract between SanDisk Corporation 

("SanDisk") and plaintiff, the motion is DENIED, plaintiff having disclosed such damages 

theory in its Responses to defendant's Interrogatories Nos. 21 and 22.

To the extent the motion seeks an order excluding evidence as to the email 

exchanges between SanDisk and plaintiff reflecting those discussions, the motion is 

GRANTED, plaintiff having failed to produce said documents in accordance with Rule 

26(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and defendant's Request No. 55 of 

its First Request for Production of Documents, and plaintiff having failed to show 

substantial justification for said failure or lack of prejudice to defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 37(c)(1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 19, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01728-MMC Document 248 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 1