Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01833/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01833-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 20

liability under section 846. 

V. CONCLUSION

In this case the Court grants Defendant's motion because

Plaintiff simply has made no showing that the government

consciously failed to act to avoid harm to users of the Golden

Gate National Recreation Area. In fact, the government has made a

strong showing that it did act to avoid the peril. The

government's efforts are sufficient to demonstrate that Plaintiff

cannot prevail on the third prong of the willfulness inquiry under

the California Recreational Use statute. Accordingly, the Court

hereby GRANTS Defendant United States' motion for summary

judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

August 15, 2005 ____________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Samuel Conti