Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00276/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00276-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs’ Proposed Order After Hearing Granting Plaintiffs until April 20, 2007 to

File a Response to the Defendants’ Notice of Compliance;

Kaur v. Alameida, Case No. 1:05-cv-00276-OW W DLB 1

CATHERINE CAMPBELL 

State Bar No. 65103

Attorney at Law

PO Box 4470

Fresno, CA 93744

tel: 559.498.8140 fax: 559.221.0268

CAROLYN D. PHILLIPS 

State Bar No. 103045

Attorney at Law

PO Box 5622

Fresno, CA 93755-5622

tel: 559.248.9833 fax: 559.248.9820

ROBERT NAVARRO

State Bar No. 128461

Attorney at Law

P.O. Box 8493

Fresno, California 93747

tel: 559.452.0934 fax: 559.452.0986

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BALJIT KAUR, et al., No. 1:05-cv-00276-OWW DLB

 Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED ORDER 

RE FILING RESPONSE TO 

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE TO THE

COURT RE COMPLIANCE WITH

THE COURT’S ORDER OF

MARCH 2, 2007.

 v.

ED ALAMEIDA, Jr., et al.

Defendants. 

 

 

On March 2, 2007, the Court heard several motions regarding discovery brought by

plaintiffs in the above-entitled matter. The Court thereafter made several orders. The

defendants filed a notice to the court re compliance with the order requiring supplemental

Case 1:05-cv-00276-OWW -DLB Document 133 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs’ Proposed Order After Hearing Granting Plaintiffs until April 20, 2007 to

File a Response to the Defendants’ Notice of Compliance;

Kaur v. Alameida, Case No. 1:05-cv-00276-OW W DLB 2

responses to request for production of documents (sets one through six) on April 5, 2007.

Plaintiffs have requested until April 20, 2007 to file a response to the defendants’

filed a notice to the court re compliance with the order requiring supplemental responses

to request for production of documents (sets one through six).

Because there is good cause, in that plaintiffs’ counsel must review the response

and the discovery received, the Court hereby grants plaintiffs’ request, and plaintiffs’

response is due on or before April 20, 2007. The Court will thereafter rule on the issue of

discovery sanctions, which is pending before the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 10, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00276-OWW -DLB Document 133 Filed 04/10/07 Page 2 of 2