Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-02562/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-02562-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 04cv2562

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELDORADO STONE, LLC; and ELDORADO

STONE OPERATIONS, LLC,

Civil No. 04cv2562-JM (CAB)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER FOLLOWING DISCOVERY

CONFERENCE

v.

RENAISSANCE STONE, INC; ALFONSO

ALVAREZ; JOSE GALVEZ MARTINEZ;

JOSEPH SMITH; ROB HABER; and ORCO

CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY,

Defendants.

And related counterclaims.

On September 8, 2006, the Court held a discovery conference. Andrea Kimball, Esq., and

Michelle Herrera, Esq., appeared in chambers for Plaintiff Eldorado Stone. Dylan Wiseman, Esq.,

appeared telephonically for Defendant Orco Construction Supply (“Orco”). Mitch Danzig, Esq.,

appeared telephonically for the Renaissance Stone Defendants. Before the Court were Defendant Orco’s

Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories and Plaintiff Eldorado Stone’s Motion to

Compel Further Responses to Requests for Admission and Interrogatories and for Document Production. 

After reviewing the parties’ submissions and the arguments of counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Defendant Orco’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories is DENIED.

2. Plaintiff Eldorado Stone’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories is

DENIED without prejudice, and the parties are ordered to meet and confer.

Case 3:04-cv-02562-JM-CAB Document 184 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 04cv2562

3. Plaintiff Eldorado Stone’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for

Admissions is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:

a. Defendant Orco will respond to Request for Admission No. 1 restated, “Admit

that Rob Hager was an employee of Orco throughout calendar year 2004.”

b. The motion is DENIED as to Requests for Admission Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6.

4. Plaintiff Eldorado Stone’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents is GRANTED in

part and DENIED in part:

a. Defendant Orco will supplement its response to Requests Nos. 41, 42, 45, 46, 47,

48, 51, 52, 57, 59 and 60 by producing “transactional history” described in

footnote 2 of Orco’s opposition. The motion to compel is otherwise DENIED

without prejudice as to these requests.

b. Defendant Orco will supplement its response to Requests Nos. 49 and 50 by

providing any requested non-privileged meeting minutes that refer to Alfonso

Alvarez, Eldorado Stone, Renaissance Stone, Joe Smith, Rob Hager, Mike

Sportelli, Bob Berguin or this litigation.

c. The motion is DENIED as to Request No. 44.

All supplemental responses are due no later then September 15, 2006.

DATED: September 11, 2006

CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: The Honorable Jeffrey T. Miller

All parties

Case 3:04-cv-02562-JM-CAB Document 184 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 2