Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00048/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00048-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN O’CONNELL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0048 LKK KJM PS

vs.

UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS

ADMINISTRATION, et al.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned as provided by Local Rule

72-302(c)(21). Calendared for hearing on August 9, 2006 is defendant’s motion to dismiss. By

order filed June 29, 2006, the motion was previously continued for hearing because it appeared

plaintiff had not timely filed opposition, due to delays in docketing plaintiff’s pleadings. 

Plaintiff has now timely filed an amended opposition under the June 29, 2006 order.

Defendant moves to strike plaintiff’s amended opposition. Although defendant is

correct that the Local Rules do not allow for plaintiff’s amended pleadings, given plaintiff’s pro

se status, the court will consider plaintiff’s amended opposition.

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00048-LKK -KJM Document 26 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant’s motion to strike is denied.

2. Reply to plaintiff’s amended opposition shall be filed no later than 12:00 noon

PST on August 4, 2006.

DATED: August 1, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

oconnell.mts

Case 2:06-cv-00048-LKK -KJM Document 26 Filed 08/01/06 Page 2 of 2