Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01740/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01740-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

ON ISSUE OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES - Case No. C06-01740 JW RS

LEGAL_US_W # 59399584.1

ROBERT B. NICHOLS (SB# 224763)

nichols@nicholslawgroup.com

300 South First Street, Suite 205

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone: (408) 298-9755

Facsimile: (408) 298-9699

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DAVID DAY

STEPHEN H. HARRIS (SB# 184608)

stephenharris@paulhastings.com

CAROLINE L. ELKIN (SB# 209156)

carolineelkin@paulhastings.com

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

515 South Flower Street

Twenty-Fifth Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228

Telephone: (213) 683-6000

Facsimile: (213) 627-0705

Attorneys for Defendant

AT&T DISABILITY INCOME PLAN

(formerly known as SBC DISABILITY INCOME PLAN)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAVID DAY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SBC DISABILITY INCOME PLAN,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-01740-JW-RS

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO PROCEED BEFORE 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ON ISSUE OF 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES 

*E-FILED 7/17/08*

Case 5:06-cv-01740-JW Document 102 Filed 07/17/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

ON ISSUE OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES - Case No. C06-01740 JW RS

-1-

In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. Section 636(c), the 

undersigned parties hereby voluntarily consent to have United States Magistrate Judge Richard 

Seeborg conduct any and all further proceedings in this case involving plaintiff David Day’s 

pending motion for attorneys’ fees, including issuance of a final order on this issue. (Docket Item 

Nos. 80, 81). Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the Court of Appeals for the 

Ninth Circuit.

Dated: July 17, 2008 ROBERT B. NICHOLS

 /s/ Robert B. Nichols

Robert B. Nichols

Attorney for Plaintiff

David Day

Dated: July 17, 2008 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

 /s/ Caroline L. Elkin

Caroline L. Elkin

Attorneys for Defendant

AT&T Disability Income Plan (formerly known as SBC 

Disability Income Plan)

Case 5:06-cv-01740-JW Document 102 Filed 07/17/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

ON ISSUE OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES - Case No. C06-01740 JW RS

-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Any and all further proceedings in this case involving plaintiff David Day’s pending motion for 

attorneys’ fees, including issuance of a final order on this issue, shall be conducted by United 

States Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg. Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to 

the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

San Jose, California, this _____ day of ________________, 2008.

_________________________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17th July

Case 5:06-cv-01740-JW Document 102 Filed 07/17/08 Page 3 of 3