Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00710/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00710-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN RIGGS,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF MARIPOSA, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 1:23-cv-00710-KES-SAB

ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING 

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 

(ECF No. 13)

On August 17, 2023, a scheduling order issued (ECF No. 10), which was modified once by 

stipulation of the parties on September 20, 2024. (ECF Nos. 13, 14.) 

On December 3, 2024, the parties filed a second stipulation to amend the scheduling order. 

(ECF No. 15.) The parties stipulate to extend the dispositive motion deadline only from December 6, 

2024 to December 20, 2024. The parties confirm they are not seeking to continue the pretrial 

conference or trial dates. 

The Court finds good cause to grant the parties’ request to extend the dispositive motion 

deadline. However, to do so, the Court must continue the pretrial conference and trial dates. A

specific period of time between the dispositive motion deadline and the pretrial conference is 

intentionally set to allow the district judge, whose schedule is extremely impacted, sufficient time to 

review and issue a ruling on any dispositive motions filed by the parties prior to the pretrial conference 

date. The parties’ instant stipulation to extend the dispositive motion deadline to December 20, 2024 

Case 1:23-cv-00710-KES-SAB Document 16 Filed 12/05/24 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

while retaining the March 17, 2025 pretrial conference does not afford the district judge sufficient time 

to adjudicate a dispositive motion in addition to his heavily impacted criminal and civil caseload prior 

to the pretrial conference. The Court shall continue the pretrial conference and trial to afford the 

district judge sufficient time to issue rulings on any dispositive motions filed by the parties on the 

stipulated amended deadline.

Accordingly, pursuant to the stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the August 17, 2023, scheduling order, as modified on September 20, 2024, is 

amended as follows:

1. Dispositive motion deadline: December 20, 2024;

2. Pretrial Conference: April 14, 2025, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 6; 

3. Trial: June 10, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 6; and

4. All other aspects of the August 17, 2023 scheduling order, as amended on September 

20, 2024, remain in effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 5, 2024 

STANLEY A. BOONE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:23-cv-00710-KES-SAB Document 16 Filed 12/05/24 Page 2 of 2