Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00987/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00987-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED FINDINGS 

 AND RECOMMENDATIONS - 1

2:06-CV-987-RRB

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. 2:06-cv-987-RRB

ORDER ADOPTIONG AMENDED

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Petitioner Angel Borg ("Petitioner"), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the denial

of parole in 2004. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). Because of

the complexity of the issues raised in this case, the Court

appointed the Federal Public Defender to represent Petitioner on

August 28, 2006. On September 14, 2006, Attorney R. Shanti Brien

was substituted in as counsel for Petitioner.

On December 27, 2006, Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison

filed Findings and Recommendations (Docket 23) herein. Based upon

ANGEL BORG,

Petitioner,

vs.

ROSANNE CAMPBELL, et al.,

Respondents.

Case 2:06-cv-00987-RRB-CMK Document 31 Filed 08/06/07 Page 1 of 2
ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED FINDINGS 

 AND RECOMMENDATIONS - 2

2:06-CV-987-RRB

objections from both parties, the Magistrate vacated the Findings

and Recommendations (Docket 27) and filed Amended Findings and

Recommendations (Docket 28) on February 7, 2007, which were served

on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed

within 20 days. Petitioner filed timely Objections to the

Magistrate’s Amended Findings and Recommendations at Docket 29. 

Inasmuch as the Court concludes the issues before it are

based in law, i.e., legal disputes, and in accordance with the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, the

Court has conducted a de novo review of the relevant pleadings

filed in this matter. Having carefully and thoroughly reviewed the

same, the Court finds the Magistrate’s Amended Findings and

Recommendations (Docket 28) to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Amended Findings and Recommendations (Docket 28)

filed on February 7, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is

dismissed with prejudice.

ENTERED this 3rd day of August, 2007.

S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00987-RRB-CMK Document 31 Filed 08/06/07 Page 2 of 2