Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-03636/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-03636-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA A. WEAVER,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

NESTLÉ USA, INC.,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 08-3636 MEJ

ORDER STAYING DEADLINE TO

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

On July 31, 2008, Defendant Nestlé USA filed an Ex Parte Motion to Enlarge Time to

Answer or Respond to Complaint. Good cause appearing, the Court STAYS the deadline for

Defendant to answer or respond to Plaintiff Joshua Weaver's Complaint until the earlier of: (a) 10

days following this Court's order on Defendant's anticipated motion to transfer; (b) 10 days

following this Court's order on Plaintiff's anticipated motion to remand; or (c) if neither party files

their anticipated motions within 14 days from the date of this Order, within 21 days from the date of

this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 31, 2008 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03636-JSW Document 3 Filed 07/31/08 Page 1 of 1