Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03418/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03418-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mac Moncada,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph M. Arpaio,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 05-3418-PHX-EHC (DKD)

ORDER

The Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #7). Plaintiff is advised of the

following specific provisions of LRCiv 7.2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States

District Court for the District of Arizona:

Subparagraph (e) provides:

Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a motion including its supporting

memorandum, and the response including its supporting memorandum, each

shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages, exclusive of attachments and any required

statement of facts. Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a reply including

its supporting memorandum shall not exceed ten (10) pages, exclusive of

attachments.

Subparagraph (i) provides:

If a motion does not conform in all substantial respects with the requirements

of this Rule, or if the opposing party does not serve and file the required

answering memoranda, or if counsel for any party fails to appear at the time

and place assigned for oral argument, such non-compliance may be deemed a

consent to the denial or granting of the motion and the court may dispose of

the motion summarily.

If Defendant's Motion to Dismiss seeks dismissal of your Complaint for your failure

to exhaust all available administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), the

Case 2:05-cv-03418-EHC-DKD Document 10 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Court may consider affidavits or other documentary evidence beyond your Complaint.

Moreover, if Defendant produces admissible evidence demonstrating that you failed to

exhaust your administrative remedies, your Complaint will be dismissed without prejudice

unless you produce your own affidavit or other admissible evidence sufficient to show that

you did exhaust all available administrative remedies.

It is Plaintiff's obligation to timely respond to all motions. The failure of Plaintiff

to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss may in the discretion of the Court be

deemed a consent to the granting of that Motion without further notice, and judgment

may be entered dismissing the complaint and action with prejudice pursuant to LRCiv

7.2(i). See Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the

date this Order is filed to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file any reply within fifteen (15)

days from the date Plaintiff’s response is filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion shall be deemed ready for decision

without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise

ordered by the Court.

DATED this 1st day of May, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03418-EHC-DKD Document 10 Filed 05/02/06 Page 2 of 2