Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02155/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02155-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN A.H. EDSALL, SR.,

Plaintiff, 2:02-cv-2155-GEB-GGH-P

vs.

R.N. JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On August 29, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the

magistrate judge’s order filed August 10, 2005, in which

Plaintiff’s second amended complaint was disregarded because it

exceeded the scope of an authorized amendment. Plaintiff’s

August 29 objections are construed as a request for

reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a

magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.” Since the magistrate judge’s 

Case 2:02-cv-02155-GEB-GGH Document 56 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

August 10 ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law,

that Order is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 19, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:02-cv-02155-GEB-GGH Document 56 Filed 09/20/05 Page 2 of 2