Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453-57/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT 

YELP INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

DURIE TANGRI LLP

MICHAEL H. PAGE (SBN 154913)

mpage@durietangri.com

217 Leidesdorff Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415-362-6666

Facsimile: 415-236-6300

Attorneys for Defendant

YELP INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MARC OPPERMAN, RACHELLE KING, 

CLAIRE MOSES, GENTRY HOFFMAN, 

STEVE DEAN, ALICIA MEDLOCK, ALAN 

BEUESHASEN, SCOTT MEDLOCK, GREG 

VARNER, JUDY LONG, GUILI BIONDI, 

JASON GREEN NIRALI MANDAYWALA, 

MARIA PIROZZI, OSCAR HERNANDEZ, 

FRANCISCO ESPITIA, HAIG ARABIAN, 

STEVEN GUTIERREZ, LAUREN CARTER, 

STEPHANIE COOLEY, STEVEN 

GUTIERREZ, LAUREN CARTER, 

STEPHANIE COOLEY, CLAIRE HODGINS, 

JUDY PAUL, AND THEDA SANDIFORD, for 

themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PATH, INC., TWITTER, INC., APPLE, INC., 

BELUGA, INC., YELP! INC., BURBN, INC., 

INSTAGRAM, INC., FOURSQUARE LABS, 

INC., GOWALLA INCORPORATED, 

FOODSPOTTING, INC., HIPSTER, INC., 

LINKEDIN CORPORATION, ROVIO MOBILE 

OY, ZEPTOLAB UK LIMITED AKA 

ZEPTOLAB, CHILLINGO LTD., 

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., and KIK 

INTERACTIVE, INC., AND INSTAGRAM, 

LLC,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:13-cv-00453-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING REPLY DEADLINE FOR 

DEFENDANT YELP INC.’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Date: August 4, 2016

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Ctrm: 9, 19th Floor

Judge: Honorable Jon S. Tigar

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 743 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT 

YELP INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

In order to accommodate deposition schedules in this matter and avoid inconveniencing other 

parties’ scheduling of those depositions, Plaintiffs and Defendant Yelp Inc. (“Yelp”), by and through 

their respective counsel of record, hereby jointly stipulate to and request that the reply date for Yelp’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment currently due on July 1, 2016 be extended to July 11, 2016. The hearing 

date for that motion, August 4, 2016, shall remain unchanged.

Dated: June 20, 2016 DURIE TANGRI LLP

By: /s/ Michael H. Page

MICHAEL H. PAGE

Attorneys for Defendant

YELP INC.

Dated: June 20, 2016 EDWARDS LAW

By: /s/ Jeffrey S. Edwards

JEFFREY S. EDWARDS 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Michael H. Page, attest that concurrence 

in the filing of this document has been obtained.

Dated: June 20, 2016 /s/ Michael H. Page

MICHAEL H. PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Upon stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________

HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

June 20, 2016

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 743 Filed 06/20/16 Page 2 of 2