Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03273/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03273-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDY REAL,

Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-3273 GEB KJN P

vs.

JAMES WALKER, Warden, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 2, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. 

Defendants have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:09-cv-03273-GEB-KJN Document 47 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 2, 2012 are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 29), is granted in part;

3. Defendants Tilton, Baughman, Hemenway, Sims, Virga, Till, Hill, and Parker

are dismissed from this action;

4. This action shall proceed against defendants Ramos, Stewart, Ventimiglia,

Parilla, Pool, Grannis, Walker, Fisher, Kisser, and Williams;

5. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is dismissed, with leave to file

and serve, within thirty days after the adoption of these findings and recommendations, a Second

Amended Complaint limited to the claims and defendants identified herein; and

6. Failure of plaintiff to timely file and serve a Second Amended Complaint

will result in the dismissal of this action.

Dated: March 30, 2012

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:09-cv-03273-GEB-KJN Document 47 Filed 03/30/12 Page 2 of 2