Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01636/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01636-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Stacey Victoria Hartnett,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF PLACER, a public 

entity; PLACER COUNTY 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES (CSOC), a 

public entity; PLACER COUNTY 

COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL 

ADVOCATES (CASA), a public 

entity; RICHARD J. BURTON, 

M.D., M.P.H., DIRECTOR as an 

individual and-in official 

capacity; KEVIN HENDERSON, as 

an individual and-in official 

capacity; DIANA RYAN, Program 

Supervisor, as an individual 

and-in official capacity; H. 

PAUL SANDERS, as an 

individual and-in official 

capacity; APRIL CAREW, as an 

individual, and-in official 

capacity; KATHY TANNER, as an 

individual, and-in official 

capacity; KAREN SCHLANGER, as 

an individual and-in official 

capacity; CANDACE SKINNER, as 

an individual and-in official 

capacity; TOM LIND, as an 

individual and-in official 

capacity; ROMNEY LYNN, as an 

individual and-in official 

capacity; DON KLEINDER, CASA 

DIRECTOR, as an individual 

and-in, official capacity; 

TAMARA LARSON, CASA worker as 

an individual and-in official 

capacity; and Does 1 through 

No. 2:13-cv-01636-GEB-KJN

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS, 

AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, STAY

Case 2:13-cv-01636-GEB-KJN Document 35 Filed 09/17/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

25 inclusive,

Defendants.

*

On January 2, 2014, Defendant Placer County Health and 

Human Services and former Defendant Placer County Sheriff’s Dept.

filed a Motion to Dismiss, and in the Alternative, Stay. (ECF No.

13.) However, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint on June 

6, 2014, which is now the operative pleading. See Hal Roach 

Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 

(9th Cir. 1989) (stating “an amended pleading supersedes the 

original”). 

Since the referenced motion does not address the 

operative pleading, it is DENIED.

Dated: September 16, 2014

 

* The caption has been amended to reflect the dismissal of Defendant 

Christine Taylor Brown. (See ECF No. 32.)

Case 2:13-cv-01636-GEB-KJN Document 35 Filed 09/17/14 Page 2 of 2