Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-01178/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-01178-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Gary Isabel, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV 11-01178-PHX-NVW (LOA)

ORDER 

AND 

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 

AND IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS 

Pending before the court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 

Magistrate Judge Anderson (Doc. 13) regarding petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that the 

Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised the 

parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 8 (citing 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Petitioner filed his objection to the R&R on March 27, 2012 (Doc. 

14). 

The Court has considered the objections and reviewed the Report and 

Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that 

the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and 

Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the 

Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the 

meaning of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole 

or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”). 

Case 2:11-cv-01178-NVW Document 15 Filed 03/28/12 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge (Doc. 13) is accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying 

and dismissing petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 (Doc. 1) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action. 

Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order 

denying Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Court FINDS: Certificate 

of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are Denied. The 

dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would 

not find the procedural ruling debatable. 

Dated this 28th day of March, 2012. 

Case 2:11-cv-01178-NVW Document 15 Filed 03/28/12 Page 2 of 2