Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03774/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03774-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stipulation and [] Order to Continue Final Approval Hearing 

Re: Palm Treo 600 and 650 Litigation Master File No. C-05-03774 RMW 1

sf-2467452 

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607) 

(PPreovolos@mofo.com) 

LORI A. SCHECHTER (CA SBN 139728) 

(LSchechter@mofo.com) 

ROGER E. COLLANTON (CA SBN 178831) 

(RCollanton@mofo.com) 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PALM, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re: PALM TREO 600 and 650 

LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To All Actions 

Master File No.: C-05-03774 RMW 

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING 

FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 

ACTION SETTLEMENT 

 

Whereas, the Court issued its order, filed January 10, 2008, granting Conditional 

Certification of Settlement Class, Approval of Forms and Methods of Notice, and Preliminary 

Approval of Settlement Agreement and Release (“Preliminary Approval Order”); 

Whereas, the Court, in its Preliminary Approval Order, set a hearing for Friday, May 2, 

2008 at 9:00 a.m., to consider and determine whether the requirements for certification of the 

Settlement Class have been met and whether the proposed settlement of the Action on the terms 

set forth in the Agreement should be approved as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best 

interests of the Settlement Class Members; whether Class Counsel’s fee and expense application, 

included as part of the settlement, should be approved; and whether the Final Judgment approving 

the settlement and dismissing the Action on the merits and with prejudice against the Class \

*E-FILED - 2/21/08*

Case 5:05-cv-03774-RMW Document 68 Filed 02/21/08 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stipulation and [] Order to Continue Final Approval Hearing 

Re: Palm Treo 600 and 650 Litigation Master File No. C-05-03774 RMW 2

sf-2467452 

Representatives and all Settlement Class Members should be entered (the “Final Approval 

Hearing”); 

Whereas, the Parties desire to continue the Final Approval Hearing date, to accommodate 

scheduling, until May 23, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Final Approval Hearing currently 

set for May 2, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. shall be continued until May 23, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. Defendant 

shall provide notice of the continued hearing date to any Settlement Class Members who have 

filed objections, as set forth in paragraph 14 of the Preliminary Approval Order. 

AGREED TO BY STIPULATION. 

Dated: February 13, 2008 IRA P. ROTHKEN 

ROTHKEN LAW FIRM 

By: : /s/ 

Ira P. Rothken 

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Dated: February 13, 2008 PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS 

LORI A. SCHECHTER 

ROGER E. COLLANTON 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By: /s/ 

Roger E. Collanton 

Counsel for Defendant 

PALM, INC. 

I, Ira P. Rothken, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that I have on file 

the concurrences for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled 

document. 

 By: /s/ 

 Ira P. Rothken 

Case 5:05-cv-03774-RMW Document 68 Filed 02/21/08 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stipulation and [] Order to Continue Final Approval Hearing 

Re: Palm Treo 600 and 650 Litigation Master File No. C-05-03774 RMW 3

sf-2467452 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 21, 2008

 

 RONALD M. WHYTE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:05-cv-03774-RMW Document 68 Filed 02/21/08 Page 3 of 3