Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01413/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01413-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

Smith v. Colvin, 3:14-cv-01413-EMC – Jt. Case Mgmnt. Statement 1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MELINDA L. HAAG, CSBN 132612 

United States Attorney 

DONNA L. CALVERT, SBN IL 6191786 

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

Social Security Administration 

TOVA WOLKING, CSBN 259782 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

160 Spear Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 977-8980 

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 

E-Mail: tova.wolking@ssa.gov 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ANNE M. SMITH, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 3:14-cv-01413-EMC 

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT 

STATEMENT 

On January 12, 2015, this Court ordered that the parties file a Joint Case Management 

Statement by February 19, 2015, and set a Case Management Conference for February 26, 2015, 

at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, in San Francisco (Dkt. #21). 

 The parties to the above-entitled action therefore respectfully submit this JOINT CASE 

MANAGEMENT STATEMENT. This case pertains to review of a closed administrative record.1

It does not involve discovery. The parties have fully briefed the case. On July 3, 2014, Defendant 

 

1 Error! Main Document Only.Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) the Court’s jurisdiction in 

this case is limited to reviewing the administrative record to determine whether the decision is 

supported by substantial evidence in the record, and whether the Commissioner complied with the 

requirements of the Constitution and the Social Security Act and administrative regulations in 

reaching the decision reviewed.

Case 3:14-cv-01413-EMC Document 23 Filed 02/20/15 Page 1 of 2 Case3:14-cv-01413-EMC Document22 Filed02/19/15 Page1 of 2
Smith v. Colvin, 3:14-cv-01413-EMC – Jt. Case Mgmnt. Statement 2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

lodged the certified administrative transcript (Dkt. #9). On August 27, 2014, Plaintiff filed her 

motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 14). On October 24, 2014, Defendant filed her cross motion 

for summary judgment (Dkt. #17). On December 8, 2014, Plaintiff filed her reply (Dkt. # 20). The 

certified administrative record and briefs are currently before the Court. Pursuant to Civil Local 

Rule 16-5, the matter is therefore “deemed submitted for decision by the District Court without 

oral argument.” 

The parties jointly request that the Court vacate the Case Management Conference and 

issue a decision in this matter, based on the administrative record and briefs filed with the court.

 Respectfully submitted, 

DATE: February 19, 2015 By: /s/ David J. Linden* 

 DAVID J. LINDEN 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 *By email authorization on 2/19/15 

DATE: February 19, 2015 MELINDA L. HAAG 

 United States Attorney 

 

 By: /s/ Tova D. Wolking 

 TOVA D. WOLKING 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Case3:14-cv-01413-EMC Document22 Filed02/19/15 Page2 of 2

IT IS SO ORDERED. CMC is reset for 4/30/15 at 9:30 a.m. An updated joint CMC 

statement shall be filed by 4/23/15. 

__________________________ 

Edward M. Chen 

U.S. District Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-01413-EMC Document 23 Filed 02/20/15 Page 2 of 2