Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-85/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO.,

LTD.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MEDIATEK, INC., et al.,

Defendants 

MEDIATEK, INC,

Counterclaimant,

 v.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO.,

LTD., et al.

Counterclaim Defendants /

No. C 05-3148 MMC

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

On May 8, 2007, plaintiff, pursuant to the Court’s order of May 1, 2007, filed a

redacted version of Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Aldo A. Badini in Support of Matsushita’s

Motion for Summary Judgment. On the first page of said filing, however, plaintiff

erroneously identified said exhibit as “Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Aldo A. Badini in

Support of Matsushita’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.”

//

//

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1054 Filed 05/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to correct the original of the exhibit by

striking the words “Opposition to Defendants’” from the title describing the filing and by

amending Docket # 1028 to set forth the correct identification of said filing, specifically,

“Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Aldo A. Badini in Support of Matsushita’s Motion for

Summary Judgment.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1054 Filed 05/10/07 Page 2 of 2