Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-01981/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-01981-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEBRA PANIAGUA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 10-01981 CW

ORDER ON

PLAINTIFF’S

FAILURE TO FILE

AN OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

On December 7, 2010, Defendants County of Alameda, et al.,

moved to dismiss Plaintiff Debra Paniagua’s amended complaint. The

hearing on Defendants’ motion was set for January 20, 2011. 

Plaintiff, who is represented by an attorney, did not file a timely

opposition. 

Notably, Plaintiff also failed to respond timely to

Defendants’ first motion to dismiss. With respect to that motion,

the Court issued an order directing her to file an opposition by a

date certain. She did not file a substantive response, but instead

offered a terse memorandum requesting leave to file an amended

complaint. 

Plaintiff shall file an opposition by January 13, 2011. If an

opposition is filed, Defendants’ reply shall be due one week

thereafter. Defendants’ motion will be taken under submission on

Case 4:10-cv-01981-CW Document 24 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

the papers. The Court VACATES the hearing set for January 20. The

initial case management conference, currently set for January 25,

is continued to February 15, 2011. 

Because Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate diligence in

prosecuting her claims, any failure to comply with this Order will

result in the dismissal of her action for failure to prosecute. 

Such dismissal will be with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 6, 2011 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-01981-CW Document 24 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 2