Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00018/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00018-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIUS ANDERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, 

SOLANO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-0018 TLN CKD P

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On September 26, 2016, plaintiff filed a second motion seeking leave to file a third 

amended complaint. For the reasons stated in the court’s September 16, 2016 order, plaintiff’s 

motion will be denied.

On August 17, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within 

thirty days, the USM-285 forms and other documents necessary to effect service on defendants

Hernandez and Mendoza. That thirty day period has passed, and plaintiff has not responded to 

the court’s order. Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for 

leave to file a third amended complaint (ECF No. 29) is denied; and

/////

Case 2:16-cv-00018-TLN-CKD Document 31 Filed 10/04/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991).

Dated: October 4, 2016

1

ande0018.fusm

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-00018-TLN-CKD Document 31 Filed 10/04/16 Page 2 of 2