Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00174/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00174-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 368
Nature of Suit: Asbestos Personal Injury - Prod.liab.
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Defendant did provide a chambers copy of a document it manually filed, specifically,

“Exhibits A-EE to the Declaration of Lawrence Stilwell Betts, MD, PhD, in Support of

General Electric Company’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand.”

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES LUCE and JEAN LUCE,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-10-0174 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF

DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On February 26, 2010, defendant General Electric Company electronically filed its

opposition to plaintiffs’ motion to remand, as well as declarations in support of its

opposition. Defendant has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders,

however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day

following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document

that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the

judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45

§ VI.G; see also Standing Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the Honorable Maxine M.

Chesney ¶ 2.1

Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Case 3:10-cv-00174-MMC Document 39 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

documents. Defendant is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each

electronically-filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-00174-MMC Document 39 Filed 03/09/10 Page 2 of 2