Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-04011/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-04011-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARY J. HONG,

Plaintiff(s), No. C 04-4011 PJH

v. ORDER

RIGHT MANAGEMENT 

CONSULTANTS, INC.,

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

Before the court is the parties’ request to extend the expert disclosure and discovery

cut-off dates. The parties submit that good cause exists because the court “continued” the

hearing date on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The hearing date was

continued to February 1, 2006, six days beyond the January 26, 2006 dispositive motion

cut-off date, because defendant’s motion was not timely filed for a January 25, 2006

hearing. The court allowed continuance of the hearing date based on defendant’s alleged

confusion regarding the weekday that the court hears such motions.

Accordingly, there is no good cause for a continuance of the expert disclosure and

discovery cut-off dates, and the request is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 20, 2006

______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-04011-PJH Document 124 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 1