Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01807/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01807-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROYLENE RAY and KELLY CANNON,

individually and on behalf of other similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

BLUEHIPPO FUNDING, LLC,

Defendant. /

No. C 06-01807 JSW

ORDER REGARDING VENUE

DISCOVERY LETTER DISPUTE

Now before the Court is Defendant BlueHippo Funding, LLC’s and Plaintiffs Roylene

Ray and Kelly Cannon’s joint letter brief dated October 25, 2007 setting out the parties’ dispute

over their current discovery obligations. 

The Court finds that the disputed, and significantly narrowed, discovery requests may

potentially bear on issues relating to the proper venue of this matter. Therefore, those discovery

requests are not stayed and the requested documents should be produced forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 26, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-01807-JSW Document 87 Filed 10/26/07 Page 1 of 1