Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00621/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00621-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEQUAN BALLARD, 1:05-CV-00621-AWI-TAG-HC

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 8)

vs. ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

 

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

J. WOODFORD, et al., 

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On May 27, 2005, the Court issued an order requiring Petitioner to submit an

application to proceed in forma pauperis OR pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action, within thirty

days from the date of service of that order. (Doc. 3). On August 3, 2005, long after the thirty-day

period had elapsed, the Court issued a Report and Recommendation that the petition be dismissed for

failure to prosecute the case and failure to obey an order of the Court. (Doc. 8). This Report and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed

timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.

///

Case 1:05-cv-00621-AWI-TAG Document 10 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation filed August 3, 2005 (Court Doc. 8), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 20, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00621-AWI-TAG Document 10 Filed 09/20/05 Page 2 of 2