Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04533/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04533-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

DAVID BURKE, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No: C 06-4533 SBA 

ORDER DENYING PENDING 

MOTIONS AS MOOT

 On January 10, 2008, the Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, in part, 

and denied Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and entered judgment for Defendants 

accordingly. Defendants filed a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and a Bill of Costs, which Plaintiffs 

moved to stay pending the Ninth Circuit’s consideration of the appeal. The Ninth Circuit has since 

issued its mandate which reverses the Court’s ruling in part and vacates the judgment. 

Accordingly, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Docket 124) 

and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay (Docket 128) are DENIED AS MOOT. This Order terminates 

Docket Nos. 124 and 128. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 15, 2010 ____________________________ 

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:06-cv-04533-SBA Document 157 Filed 03/17/10 Page 1 of 1