Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00225/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00225-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

20306669v1 

REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SEDGWICK LLP 

MARK J. HANCOCK SBN 160662 

mark.hancock@sedgwicklaw.com 

REBECCA A. HULL SBN 99802 

rebecca.hull@sedgwicklaw.com 

ERIN A. CORNELL SBN 227135 

erin.cornell@sedgwicklaw.com 

333 Bush Street, 30th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104-2834 

Telephone: 415.781.7900 

Facsimile: 415.781.2635 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TESSA DAWSON; BRIAN GONSALVES; 

JAMIE GONSALVES; and BRONWYN 

DAWSON, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:15-cv-00225 MEJ 

REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Plaintiff Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) hereby respectfully requests as 

follows: 

This matter involves a Complaint in Interpleader, filed by MetLife on March 15, 2015. 

(ECF No. 1.) On April 20, 2015, MetLife and defendants Tessa Dawson (“Tessa”), Brian 

Gonsalves (“Brian”), Jamie Gonsalves (“Jamie”) and Bronwyn Dawson (“Bronwyn”) (collectively 

“defendants”) filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Distribution of Funds, Discharge 

of Stakeholder and Dismissal of Action With Prejudice, wherein the parties agreed that Tessa 

Case 3:15-cv-00225-MEJ Document 15 Filed 06/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

20306669v1 2 

REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

would deposit the Plan Benefits at issue in the trust account of her attorney, Fredric L. Webster. 

(ECF No. 12.) On April 21, 2015, the Court signed the Order. (ECF No. 13.) 

Due to miscommunications, the Plan Benefits have not yet been deposited into Mr. 

Webster’s client trust account. MetLife understands, however, that the Plan Benefits will be 

deposited within the next few weeks. Therefore, MetLife respectfully requests that the case 

management conference currently set for June 18, 2015, be continued to July 30, 2015 at 10 a.m., 

so that the parties may finalize the implementation of the order regarding the Plan Benefits and file 

a dismissal of the action with prejudice. 

DATED: June 9, 2015 SEDGWICK LLP 

By: /s/ Erin A. Cornell

Mark J. Hancock 

Erin A. Cornell 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

ORDER

Pursuant to plaintiff Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s request, the Court hereby 

continues the case management conference, presently set for June 18, 2015, to July 30, 2015 at 

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, of the Courthouse located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San 

Francisco. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ________________ 

Honorable Maria Elena James 

United States Magistrate Judge 

JUNE 9, 2015

Case 3:15-cv-00225-MEJ Document 15 Filed 06/09/15 Page 2 of 2