Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01568/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01568-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANET BURGES as the administrator

of the Estate of Philip Burges,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-1568 FCD JFM P

vs.

ELI B. RICHMAN, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this civil rights

action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 25, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No party has

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

Case 2:02-cv-01568-FCD-JFM Document 100 Filed 05/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 25, 2005 are adopted in full; 

2. Defendant Richman’s December 15, 2004 motion for summary judgment is

granted;

3. Judgment shall be entered for defendant Richman on plaintiff’s Eighth

Amendment claim and plaintiff’s state law medical malpractice claim;

4. The state defendants’ December 15, 2004 motion for summary judgment is

granted;

5. Judgment shall be entered for the state defendants on plaintiff’s Eighth

Amendment claim; 

6. This court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s state

law medical malpractice claim against defendants Beams, Sandham, Busi, Bick, Williams, and

Steever; and

7. This action is dismissed.

DATED: May 19, 2005. 

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/burg1568.801

Case 2:02-cv-01568-FCD-JFM Document 100 Filed 05/23/05 Page 2 of 2