Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01268/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01268-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIRAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

MONOLITHIC SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY,

INC, et al.,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 04-1268 VRW (MEJ)

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST

TO COMPEL SUPPLEMENTAL

INTERROGATORY RESPONSES

The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint meet and confer letter, filed June 7, 2006,

regarding plaintiff UniRAM Technology, Inc.'s ("UniRAM") request to compel defendant Taiwan

Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. ("TSMC") to supplement its responses to UniRAM's

interrogatories to encompass the 90nm embedded DRAM technology generation. Upon review of

the parties' letter, the Court finds that the burden of producing discovery related to 90nm prototypes

outweighs any probative value at this stage in the proceedings. Accordingly, TSMC need not

supplement its responses at this time. However, should TSMC begin commercial production of

90nm products, it shall supplement its responses forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 19, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 188 Filed 06/19/06 Page 1 of 1