Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01230/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01230-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUSTY LUGO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1230 GEB KJM P

vs.

DOCTOR PAI, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed July 2, 2007, plaintiff was ordered to file an affidavit in support

of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days

and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s

order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:07-cv-01230-GEB -KJM Document 5 Filed 08/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 30, 2007. 

/lugo1230.fifp

Case 2:07-cv-01230-GEB -KJM Document 5 Filed 08/30/07 Page 2 of 2