Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01332/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01332-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FINANCIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

INDERBIR SINGH GREWAL, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:14-cv-01332-DAD-EPG

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

(Doc. No. 58)

On March 8, 2016, cross-defendant Intervalley Insurance Services notified the court that 

this matter had been settled. (Doc. No. 58.) The court issued a minute order vacating all future 

hearing dates and providing that a stipulated dismissal was required to be filed by the parties no 

later than April 8, 2016. (Doc. No. 59.) The court warned in that minute order that “[i]f not 

received, the Court may dismiss the matter on its own authority.” (Id.) Nonetheless, no 

stipulated dismissal was filed with the court. On April 21, 2016, the court contacted counsel in 

the case via email and counsel represented that the dismissal stipulation would be filed in ten 

days. However, that has still not occurred. 

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 1:14-cv-01332-DAD-EPG Document 60 Filed 05/11/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, within fourteen days of the date of this order, counsel shall show cause in 

writing why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the court’s orders. 

Alternatively, counsel may file the stipulated dismissal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01332-DAD-EPG Document 60 Filed 05/11/16 Page 2 of 2