Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02093/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02093-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

BARCLAYS BANK PLC; DANIEL 

BRIN; SCOTT CONNELLY; KAREN 

LEVINE; and RYAN SMITH,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-02093-TLN-DB

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the motion by twelve administrative law professors to file an 

amicus brief in connection with Plaintiff’s Motion To Affirm Civil Penalties. ECF No. 180. The 

Court has determined that the amicus motion may be decided without further briefing or oral 

argument.

The parties have already provided the Court with sophisticated and thorough briefing on 

the pertinent issues. The Court does not believe that further briefing by the proposed amici would 

be helpful to resolution of the motion.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:13-cv-02093-TLN-DB Document 185 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the amicus motion (ECF No. 180), is

DENIED, and the December 8, 2016 hearing on the motion is VACATED.

Dated: November 16, 2016

Case 2:13-cv-02093-TLN-DB Document 185 Filed 11/17/16 Page 2 of 2