Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-03060/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-03060-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

GEORGE M. PAPA, and DEBRA JO

PAPA, husband and wife, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

STATE OF ARIZONA, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-3060-PHX-MHM

AMENDED ORDER

The Court will amend the Order issued on September 11, 2008 (Dkt. #43), to

reflect that Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Dkt. #42) is DENIED as moot rather than

granted. The Court no longer retains jurisdiction to consider motions filed in this case

pending appeal, as discussed in the Court’s September 11, 2008 Order. See Dkt. #43; see

also Crateo, Inc. v. Intermark, Inc., 536 F.2d 862, 869 (9th Cir. 1976) ("Because of the

pending appeal, the District Court [has] no jurisdiction to enter an order under Rule

60(b).”); McManus v. District of Columbia, 545 F.Supp.2d 129, 133 (D.D.C. 2008) (“The

district court does not regain jurisdiction over the aspects of the case involved in the

appeal until the court of appeals issues its mandate.”). 

///

///

///

///

Case 2:06-cv-03060-MHM Document 44 Filed 09/16/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED amending the Court’s September 11, 2008 Order

(Dkt. #43) to reflect that Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Dkt. #42) is DENIED as moot

rather than granted.

DATED this 15th day of September, 2008.

Case 2:06-cv-03060-MHM Document 44 Filed 09/16/08 Page 2 of 2