Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00008/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00008-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

17-cv-8-BTM-AGS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Olga H. Villars and Linda A. Villars,

Plaintiffs,

v.

Richard J. Villars,

Defendant.

Case No.: 17-cv-8-BTM-AGS

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

On January 4, 2019, the Court issued an order to show cause, if any, why 

this case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. (See ECF No. 7.) 

Under this district’s Local Civil Rule 41.1(a): 

Actions or proceedings which have been pending in this court for 

more than six months, without any proceeding or discovery having 

been taken therein during such period, may, after notice, be 

dismissed by the court for want of prosecution, at the calling of a 

calendar prepared for that purpose by the clerk. Such a dismissal 

must be without prejudice, unless otherwise ordered.

CivLR 41.1(a). The action has been pending in this Court for more than six 

months without any proceeding or discovery. Moreover, parties have failed 

Case 3:17-cv-00008-BTM-AGS Document 8 Filed 02/27/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

17-cv-8-BTM-AGS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to respond to the order to show cause. Thus, dismissal without prejudice is

warranted.

Accordingly, the Court hereby orders that the above-captioned action

is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 27, 2019

Case 3:17-cv-00008-BTM-AGS Document 8 Filed 02/27/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2