Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-02144/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-02144-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

DERRIC WEBB, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

) CIV 08-02144 PHX MHM MEA

vs. ) 

) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOSEPH ARPAIO, ) FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

) 

 Defendant. ) 

__________________________)

TO THE HONORABLE MARY H. MURGUIA:

Plaintiff filed his complaint on November 19, 2008.

On February 13, 2009, the Court ordered Plaintiff to complete

and return a service packet for Defendant to the Court by March

5, 2009. That order warned Plaintiff that his failure to timely

comply with the provisions of the order would result in the

dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure. 

Plaintiff was warned that his failure to acquire a

waiver of service from Defendant or to complete service of

process on Defendant within 60 days of the Court’s order, by

April 13, 2009, would result in the dismissal of the complaint

pursuant to Rule 4(m), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and

Rule 16.2(b)(2)(B), Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the

United States District Court for the District of Arizona. 

Case 2:08-cv-02144-MHM Document 9 Filed 04/14/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

On March 12, 2009, the Court allowed Plaintiff until

March 26, 2009, to show cause why this case should not be

dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s

order of February 13, 2009, and Plaintiff’s failure to return

service packets to the Court. Plaintiff has failed to show

cause for his failure to abide by the Court’s orders and to

effect service of process on Defendant. There is no indication

in the civil docket in this matter that Plaintiff did not

receive the Order to Show Cause.

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this case be

dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to serve the Defendant in this

matter and for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s

order of February 13, 2009, and his failure to respond to the

Order to show cause issued March 12, 2009.

DATED this 13th day of April, 2009.

Case 2:08-cv-02144-MHM Document 9 Filed 04/14/09 Page 2 of 2