Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01002/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01002-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL AARON JAYNE,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-1002 LKK KJM P

vs.

DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

AND REHABILITATION,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 29, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 

/////

Case 2:06-cv-01002-LKK -KJM Document 40 Filed 03/31/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (docket no. 37), are adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (docket no. 18) is granted as to the Brady

claim but denied as to the claim that Hughes contradicted his earlier testimony;

3. The petition is denied insofar as petitioner alleges that Hughes’ testimony in

the civil rights action contradicted his testimony at petitioner’s preliminary hearing; and

4. This case is closed.

DATED: March 28, 2008.

Case 2:06-cv-01002-LKK -KJM Document 40 Filed 03/31/08 Page 2 of 2