Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02042/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02042-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING 

ORDER, CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 CRB 

2857162_1.DOC 

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838 

STEVEN D. GUGGENHEIM, State Bar No. 201386 

CAZ HASHEMI, State Bar No. 210239 

CAMERON P. HOFFMAN, State Bar No. 229316 

MARK T. OAKES, State Bar No. 234598 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Email: moakes@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PRENA SMAJLAJ, Individually and On Behalf 

of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC., GREGORY L. REYES and ANTONIO 

CANOVA, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 3:05-cv-2042 CRB 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 175 Filed 04/14/06 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING 

ORDER, CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 CRB 

-1- 2857162_1.DOC 

STIPULATION 

WHEREAS, plaintiff’s consolidated complaint is due to be filed on April 14, 2006 

pursuant to the Court’s March 1, 2006 Order granting plaintiff an extension of time in which to 

file a consolidated complaint; 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding the scheduling of the 

defendants’ response to the consolidated complaint; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, 

subject to approval of the Court, that the schedule for the defendants’ responses to the 

consolidated complaint shall be as follows: 

Defendants’ Motions Due: June 9, 2006 

Plaintiff’s Oppositions Due: July 24, 2006 

Defendants’ Replies Due: August 23, 2006 

Hearing on Defendants’ Motions: September 8, 2006 at 10:00 a.m., or such other date 

and time as the Court deems appropriate. 

Dated: April 13, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Steven D. Guggenheim 

Nina F. Locker 

Steven D. Guggenheim 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 

Dated: April 13, 2006 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & 

FLOM LLP 

300 South Grand, Suite 3400 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 687-5000 

Facsimile: (213) 687-5600 

By: /s/ Jack DiCanio 

Richard Marmaro 

 Jack DiCanio 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Gregory Reyes 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 175 Filed 04/14/06 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING 

ORDER, CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 CRB 

-2- 2857162_1.DOC 

Dated: April 13, 2006 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

275 Middlefield Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

 Telephone: (650) 324-7000 

Facsimile: (650) 324-0638 

By: /s/ Alexander Lyon 

Norman Blears 

 Alexander Lyon 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Antonio Canova 

Dated: April 13, 2006 NIX, PATTERSON & ROACH, L.L.P. 

205 Linda Drive 

Daingerfield, TX 75638 Telephone: (903) 645-7333 

Facsimile: (903) 645-4415 

By: /s/ Bradley E. Beckworth 

Bradley E. Beckworth 

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the 

Proposed Class 

 PATTON, ROBERTS, MCWILLIAMS 

& CAPSHAW, LLP 

Century Bank Plaza 

2900 St. Michael Drive, Suite 400 Texarkana, TX 75505-6128 Telephone: 903-334-7000 Facsimile: 903-330-7007 

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the 

Proposed Class 

KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 

555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1501 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

 Telephone: 415-772-4700 

 Facsimile: 415-772-4707 

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the 

Proposed Class 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 175 Filed 04/14/06 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING 

ORDER, CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 CRB 

-3- 2857162_1.DOC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the schedule for the 

defendants’ response to the consolidated complaint shall be as follows: 

Defendants’ Motions Due June 9, 2006 

Plaintiff’s Oppositions Due July 24, 2006 

Defendants’ Replies Due August 23, 2006 

Hearing on Defendants’ Motions September 8, 2006 at 10:00 a.m., or such other date 

and time as the Court deems appropriate. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________ 

THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

 United States District Judge 

April 14, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

U

Judge Charles R. Breyer

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 175 Filed 04/14/06 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING 

ORDER, CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 CRB 

-4- 2857162_1.DOC 

I, Mark T. Oakes, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER. In compliance with 

General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that each of the other signatories has concurred in this 

filing. 

Dated: April 13, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Mark T. Oakes 

Mark T. Oakes 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 175 Filed 04/14/06 Page 5 of 5