Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03105/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03105-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2003\3105\order 4 amend.wpd

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN YOURKE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et

al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 03-03105 CRB

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second

Amended Complaint. After carefully considering the parties’ memoranda, as well as the

current posture of the lawsuit, the Court finds that oral argument is unnecessary pursuant to

Local Rule 7-1(b). Plaintiff’s motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice to re-noticing the

motion after the Ninth Circuit has issued an opinion in the parallel class action, Bull v. City

and County of San Francisco, Case No. C 03-1840 CRB. To conserve judicial resources, this

lawsuit is hereby STAYED in its entirety pending the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Bull. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2006

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-03105-CRB Document 101 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2003\3105\order 4 amend.wpd 2

Case 3:03-cv-03105-CRB Document 101 Filed 07/25/06 Page 2 of 2