Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-00978/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-00978-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 The Court granted OneWest’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s claim under the Truth in Lending

Act. (Doc. No. 25, at 4.)

- 1 - 09cv978

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LINDSEY KAE SCHAEFER,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 09-CV-978 JLS (CAB)

ORDER: GRANTING

DEFENDANT ONE WEST BANK,

FSB’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

(Doc. No. 29)

vs.

SAN DIEGO CORNERSTONE

MORTGAGE; INDYMAC FEDERAL

BANK, F.S.B.; ONEWEST BANK, FSB.;

FDIC; et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff filed this action on March 30, 2009. (Doc. No. 1 Ex. 1 (Compl.).) She alleged that

Defendants violated, inter alia, the Perata Mortgage Relief Act and the California Unfair Business

Practices Act. (Id.) On June 21, 2010, the Court denied Defendant OneWest Bank, FSB’s (OneWest)

motion to dismiss the Perata Mortgage Relief Act and California Unfair Business Practices Act

claims.1

 (Doc. No. 25.)

Presently before the Court is OneWest’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff’s surviving

claims. (Doc. No. 29.) Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s statement of non-opposition regarding

OneWest’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 33.) Plaintiff concedes that, in light of Mabry

v. Superior Court, 110 Cal. Rptr. 3d (Cal. Ct. App. 2010), her Perata Mortgage Relief Act claim lacks

Case 3:09-cv-00978-JLS-CAB Document 34 Filed 01/03/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 09cv978

merit. (Id.) And because Plaintiff cannot prevail on that claim, her Unfair Business Practices Act

claim also fails. See Cal-Tech Commc’n, Inc. v. L.A. Cellular Tel. Co., 973 P.2d 527, 539–40 (Cal.

1999).

Accordingly, OneWest’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. This Order concludes

the litigation in this matter. The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 3, 2011

Honorable Janis L. Sammartino

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00978-JLS-CAB Document 34 Filed 01/03/11 Page 2 of 2