Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02361/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02361-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 140
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The caption has been amended according to the Dismissal of Doe 1

Defendants portion of this Order.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERNEST ALTMANN, ) 2:09-cv-02361-GEB-GGH

)

Plaintiff, ) STATUS ORDER AND ORDER

) CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL

v. ) SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

) 

INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, GREEN TREE )

SERVICING, LLC; NATIONAL CITY )

MORTGAGE A DIVISION OF NATIONAL ) 

CITY BANK, FIRST BANK DBA FIRST )

BANK MORTGAGE; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE)

CORP.; BANK OF AMERICA; MORTGAGE )

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, )

INC.; REMIEN MORTGAGE FAMILY, INC.;)

ROBERT REMIEN: GEORGE ROJAS, )

) 

Defendants. )

1

)

A status conference was scheduled in this case on February

1, 2010; however, that status conference was submitted in light of the

status of this case. Two defendants filed a status report in

connection with the February 1, 2010 status conference, in which they

state Plaintiff made no attempt to contact their counsel about the

content of a joint status report. Plaintiff failed to file a timely

status report, and has not yet served two defendants; the service

issue will be addressed in a separate order. The two defendants

submitting a joint status report indicate this case should not yet be

fully scheduled since the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint will be

Case 2:09-cv-02361-GEB-KJN Document 38 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

challenged in a dismissal motion. Therefore, the following status

order issues, and a further status hearing is scheduled to commence at

9:00 a.m. on June 14, 2010, and a joint status report shall be filed

fourteen days before the status hearing.

DISMISSAL OF DOE DEFENDANTS

Since Plaintiff has not justified Doe defendants remaining 

in this action, Does 1 through 20 are dismissed. See Order Setting

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference filed August 25, 2009, at 2

n.2 (indicating that if justification for "Doe" defendant allegations

not provided Doe defendants would be dismissed).

SERVICE, JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES, AMENDMENT

No further service or joinder of parties is permitted,

except with leave of Court, good cause having been shown. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:09-cv-02361-GEB-KJN Document 38 Filed 02/04/10 Page 2 of 2