Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07336/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07336-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

@Zcc^\Vc( :ZccZii $ <dgbVc aae 

aVlnZgh 

adh Vc\ZaZh( XVa^[dgc^V 

Roderick G. Dorman (SBN 96908) 

dormanr@hbdlawyers.com 

Alan P. Block (SBN 143783) 

blocka@hbdlawyers.com 

Marc Morris (SBN 183728) 

morrism@hbdlawyers.com 

Kevin Shenkman (SBN 223315) 

HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

dormanr@hbdlawyers.com 

blocka@hbdlawyers.com 

morrism@hbdlawyers.com 

shenkmank@hbdlawyers.com

865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2900 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (213) 694-1200 

Facsimile: (213) 694-1234 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, SPEEDTRACK, INC. 

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 

Steven M. Bauer (admitted pro hac vice) 

Colin G. Cabral (admitted pro hac vice) 

One International Place 

Boston, MA 02110 

Telephone: (617) 526-9600 

sbauer@proskauer.com 

ccabral@proskauer.com 

Jonathan E. Rich (SBN 187386) 

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 

2049 Century Park East,Suite 3200 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206 

Telephone: (310) 557-2900 

Facsimile: (310) 557-2193 

jrich@proskauer.com 

Attorneys for Intervenor, ENDECA 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Roderick M. Thompson (SBN 96192) 

Andrew Leibnitz (SBN 184723) 

Stephanie P. Skaff (SBN 183119) 

FARELLA BRAUN & MARTELL LLP 

235 Montgomery St., 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 954-4400 

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 

rthompson@fbm.com 

aleibnitz@fbm.com 

sskaff@fbm.com 

Attorneys for Defendant, WAL-MART 

STORES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SPEEDTRACK, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 06-CV-07336-PJH 

REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED 

JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE 

TREATMENT OF CONFIDENTIAL 

INFORMATION 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 1 of 25
-2- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ENDECA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Intervenor, 

 vs. 

SPEEDTRACK, INC., 

 Defendant in Intervention.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 2 of 25
-1- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

@Zcc^\Vc( :ZccZii $ <dgbVc aae 

aVlnZgh 

adh Vc\ZaZh( XVa^[dgc^V 

Whereas pretrial discovery in this action will necessarily involve the disclosure of trade 

secrets or confidential research, development, product or commercial information by the 

undersigned parties and by other non-parties from whom discovery may be sought; and 

Whereas the undersigned parties wish to establish rules and procedures governing the 

treatment of such information, and accordingly have conferred in good faith with respect to the 

terms of this Protective Order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c); 

Whereas the Court issued a Notice on November 5, 2007, instructing the parties to remove 

certain provisions from Paragraphs 12 and 24 and submit a revised, amended and restated joint 

stipulated protective order; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND AMONG THE UNDERSIGNED 

PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 

1. Scope Of Protection.1

1.1 This Protective Order shall govern any record of information produced in this action 

and designated pursuant to ¶ 2 and its subparts below, including all designated deposition testimony, 

all designated testimony taken at a hearing or other proceeding, interrogatory answers, document, 

and other discovery materials, whether produced informally or in response to interrogatories, 

requests for admissions, requests for production of documents or any other formal method of 

discovery. 

1.2 This Protective Order shall also govern any designated record of information 

produced in this action pursuant to disclosure requirements established by any federal procedural 

rule or any Northern District of California local rule, and any supplementary disclosures thereto. 

1.3 This Protective Order shall apply to the undersigned parties hereto and to any nonparty from whom discovery may be sought and who desires the protection of this Protective Order 

(collectively herein referred to as a “party” or the “parties”). 

 

1

 A Joint Stipulated Proposed Protective Order was filed by the parties on September 24, 2007 and 

entered by this Court the same day. However, the original protective order did not address the 

treatment of source code. The parties have now come to an agreement concerning the treatment of 

source code and hereby respectfully file this Revised, Amended and Restated Protective Order. 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 3 of 25
-2- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2. Designation. 

2.1 CONFIDENTIAL-SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER. Each party shall have 

the right to designate as restricted to review by those categories of individuals listed in ¶ 4.2 below, 

and subject to this Protective Order, any documents or information produced by it in this action that 

contain, reflect, or otherwise disclose confidential and nonpublic technical, personal, business, or 

financial information (“Confidential Information”). This designation shall be made by stamping or 

otherwise labeling each page or thing containing Confidential Information with the legend 

CONFIDENTIAL-SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER prior to its production or, if inadvertently 

produced without such legend, by furnishing written notice to the receiving party that the 

information all be considered CONFIDENTIAL-SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER. The 

parties will use reasonable care to avoid designating any documents or information 

CONFIDENTIAL-SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER that are generally available to the public. 

2.2 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY. Each party shall 

have the right to designate as restricted to review by those categories of individuals identified in 

¶ 4.1 below, and subject to this Protective Order, any documents or information produced by it in 

this action which it reasonably and in good faith believes is so highly sensitive that its disclosure to 

persons other than those identified in ¶ 4.1 below could reasonably be expected to result in 

competitive injury to the producing party (“Highly Confidential Information”). Such information 

may include but is not limited to: (a) current business/strategic plans; (b) sales, cost and price 

information including future sales/financial projections; (c) non-public marketing information 

including future marketing plans; (d) detailed sales and financial data that includes cost and profit 

information; (e) customer lists; (f) licensing, licensing policies, and licensing negotiations; and (g) 

other information of business, commercial, competitive, financial, marketing, sales or technical 

significance comparable to the items listed in this paragraph. This designation shall be made by 

stamping or otherwise labeling each page or thing containing Highly Confidential Information with 

the legend HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY prior to its production or, if 

inadvertently produced without such legend, by furnishing written notice to the receiving party that 

the information shall be considered HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 4 of 25
-3- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

under this Protective Order. Use of this highly restrictive designation is limited to information of 

the highest sensitivity. The parties will use reasonable care to avoid designating any documents or 

information HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY for which the designating 

party does not have a good faith belief that the documents or information satisfy the criteria set forth 

in this paragraph. 

2.3 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY. 

Each party shall have the right to designate as restricted to review by those categories of individuals 

identified in ¶ 4.3 below, and subject to this Protective Order, any computer source code (regardless 

of how generated, stored or maintained) and other information disclosing or directly related to 

computer source code which the designating party believes in good faith is so highly sensitive that 

its disclosure to persons other than those identified in ¶ 4.3 below could reasonably be expected to 

result in competitive injury to the producing party (“Highly Confidential Source Code”). This 

designation shall be made by stamping or otherwise labeling each page or thing containing Highly 

Confidential Source Code information with the legend HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE 

CODE –OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY prior to its production or, if inadvertently produced without 

such legend, by furnishing written notice to the receiving party that the information shall be 

considered Highly Confidential Source Code under this Protective Order. Use of this highly 

restrictive designation is limited to information of the highest sensitivity. The parties will use 

reasonable care to avoid designating any documents or information HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 

SOURCE CODE-OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY for which the designating party does not have a 

good faith belief that the documents or information satisfy the criteria set forth in this ¶ 2.3. 

2.4 To the extent that any party has, prior to the date that this Protective Order is entered, 

produced to the other side materials that the producing party has marked with any confidentiality 

designation, all such materials shall be considered to have been designated under this Protective 

Order as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY unless otherwise agreed by the 

parties. 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 5 of 25
-4- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3. Limit On Use And Disclosure Of Designated Information. 

3.1 Each party and all persons bound by the terms of this Protective Order shall use any 

information or document governed by this Protective Order only in connection with the prosecution 

or defense of this action, except by consent of the parties or order of the Court. No party or other 

person shall disclose or release to any person not authorized under this Protective Order any 

information or document governed by this Protective Order for any purpose, or to any person 

authorized under this Protective Order for any purpose other than in connection with the prosecution 

or defense of this action. 

3.2 It is understood, however, that counsel for a party may give advice and opinions to 

his or her client based on his or her evaluation of confidential information designated under this 

Protective Order and received by the party, provided that such rendering of advice and opinions 

shall not reveal the content of such information except by prior written agreement with counsel for 

the producing party. 

3.3 The attorneys of record for the parties and other persons receiving information 

governed by this Protective Order shall exercise reasonable care to ensure that the information and 

documents governed by this Protective Order are: (a) used only for the purposes specified herein, 

and (b) disclosed only to authorized persons. 

4. Disclosure Of Protected Information. 

4.1 Disclosure Of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY 

Material. Documents or information designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY shall be disclosed by the recipient thereof only to: 

(a) the attorneys employed by the following law firms of record for the parties, 

and their authorized secretarial, clerical and legal assistant staff: Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman, 

LLP; Farella Braun & Martell LLP; and Proskauer Rose LLP (collectively, “Outside Counsel”); 

(b) the Court and Court personnel, as provided in ¶ 13 below; 

(c) consultants or experts and their staffs retained by the parties or their attorneys 

for purposes of this action, who are agreed upon by the parties pursuant to ¶ 8 below, who are not 

employees or otherwise affiliated with any of the parties, and who first agree to be bound by the 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 6 of 25
-5- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

terms of this Protective Order by executing Exhibit A to this Protective Order; 

(d) court reporters and videographers employed in connection with this action; 

(e) outside copying and computer services necessary for document handling and 

other litigation support personnel (e.g., graphic designers and animators); 

(f) witnesses deposed in this action under the following circumstances: (1) any 

witness may be shown HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY material in 

situations where the witness is identified as the originator, signatory, author, addressee, or recipient; 

(2) the witness is a current or former officer, director or employee of the designating party; or (3) the 

witness was selected by the designating party to provide testimony pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 

(g) any other person agreed to in writing by the designating party or allowed 

through Court order. 

4.2 Disclosure Of CONFIDENTIAL-SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Material. Documents or information designated CONFIDENTIAL-SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE 

ORDER shall be disclosed by the recipient thereof only to: 

(a) the receiving party’s Outside Counsel in this action, including their authorized 

secretarial, clerical and legal assistant staff; 

(b) persons entitled access to HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY information pursuant to ¶ 4.1 above; and 

(c) up to three (3) additional designated employees (“Designated Employees”) 

for each of the parties, to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, who is 

identified below and has executed Exhibit A to this Protective Order. Those Designated Employees 

are as follows: 

John Kelleher, Milan Merhar, and Fritz Knabe for Endeca Technologies, Inc. 

Linsey Morrison and Michael C. Li for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 

Miles Yano and Jerzy Lewak for SpeedTrack, Inc. 

SpeedTrack and Wal-Mart may each identify a Third Designated Employee at a later date 

with at least 10 days notice to all parties. In the event a Designated Employee identified above is no 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 7 of 25
-6- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

longer available to the receiving party, a receiving party, may, with ten days notice to all parties, 

identify another Designated Employee entitled to receive information designated as 

CONFIDENTIAL-SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER. 

4.3 Disclosure Of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – OUTSIDE 

COUNSEL ONLY Material. Documents or information designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 

SOURCE CODE – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY shall be disclosed by the recipient thereof only to: 

(a) The receiving party’s Outside Counsel in this action, including Outside 

Counsel’s authorized secretarial, clerical and legal assistant staff; 

(b) the Court and Court personnel, as provided in ¶ 13 below; 

(c) No more than two (2) consultants or experts and their staffs retained by each 

of the parties or their attorneys for purposes of this action, who are agreed upon by the parties 

pursuant to ¶ 8 below, who are not employees or otherwise affiliated with any of the parties, and 

who first agree to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order by executing Exhibit A to this 

Protective Order; 

(d) court reporters and videographers employed in connection with this action; 

(e) outside copying services with the consent of the designating party, to be 

granted on a case-by-case basis, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; 

(f) witnesses deposed in this action under the following circumstances: (1) any 

witness may be shown HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE-OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY 

material in situations where the witness is identified as the originator, signatory, author, addressee, 

or recipient; (2) the witness is a current or former officer, director or employee of the designating 

party; or (3) the witness was selected by the designating party to provide testimony pursuant to Rule 

30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Persons authorized to view HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE-OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY material under this paragraph 

shall not retain or be given copies of the HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE-OUTSIDE 

COUNSEL ONLY except to the extent such person must review the source code designated under 

this Protective Order during a deposition or when otherwise providing testimony. 

(g) any other person agreed to in writing by the designating party or allowed 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 8 of 25
-7- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

through Court order. 

5. Special Procedures For Handling Source Code Productions. 

5.1 For purposes of this Protective Order, the term “source code” shall include human 

and machine readable program codes as well as object and executable code and software. 

5.2 Given the particularly sensitive nature of source code, additional protections for 

source code are warranted. In addition to all other restrictions and protections, the following 

additional restrictions and protections shall govern source code designated as HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE-OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY: 

(a) only those persons qualified to receive HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE 

CODE – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY material under ¶ 4.3 (a) - 4.3(g) above shall be permitted 

access to source code disclosures; 

(b) the producing party shall make source code disclosures available for review 

on a host computer at the following locations: if the producing party is Wal-Mart Stores or Endeca 

Technologies, Inc., the source code disclosures shall be made available at the office of Proskauer 

Rose, LLP, located at 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3200, Los Angeles, California, 90067; if the 

producing party is Speedtrack, Inc., the source code disclosures shall be made available at the office 

of Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman, LLP, located at 865 S. Figueroa St., Suite 2900, Los Angeles, 

California, 90017; 

(c) the host computer shall be made available during normal business hours, 9 am 

to 5 pm local time, Monday through Friday (excluding holidays), and other days and/or times upon 

reasonable request; 

(d) counsel for the discovering party that requests a review of source code must 

give at least 2 (two) business days notice to counsel for the producing party that it will be sending 

specified individuals authorized under ¶¶ 4.3(a), (c) and (g) above to review the source code made 

available on the host computer; 

(e) the host computer shall be equipped to store print requests in a print folder 

and shall also be connected to a printer. The discovering party may make reasonable requests for 

paper copies of desired portions of the source code by placing corresponding print requests in the 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 9 of 25
-8- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

print folder. In this event, the producing party shall print the requested paper copies, apply Bates 

production numbers to them, designate each page as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE 

– OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY and provide the copies to the discovering party by the conclusion of 

the daily review session or as soon thereafter as is reasonably practicable; 

(f) in no event is the discovering party entitled to receive from the producing 

party electronic copies of desired portions of the disclosed source code; furthermore no electronic 

copies of any portion of source code may be made; 

(g) counsel for the discovering party may make limited paper copies of excerpts 

of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE-OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY material, such 

paper copies to be used as an exhibit to testimony, motion, expert report or disclosure, or otherwise 

as reasonably necessary in connection with the litigation, but only if and to the extent believed in 

good faith to be necessary. Any paper copies of source code, if filed with the Court, shall be filed 

under seal pursuant to ¶ 13; 

(h) use of physical copies containing HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE 

CODE – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY material for depositions, motions and trial shall only occur 

in a manner that assures disclosure of such information only to those permitted access to it under 

this Protective Order and only on a need-to-know and relevancy basis. Court reporters and/or 

videographers shall not retain copies of any HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODEOUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY material; 

(i) counsel for the discovering party shall keep a log of the working paper copies 

of the source code, when the copies were made, to whom they were provided, and when they were 

provided. At the final conclusion of the litigation, the receiving party’s designated and identified 

expert(s) under ¶ 4.3(c) above must certify in writing that all copies of the source code were 

returned to the counsel that provided the information. Furthermore, counsel for the discovering 

party must provide to counsel for the producing party the log and all paper copies of the source code 

in possession of counsel, with the exception of any documents retained in accordance with ¶ 22; 

(j) subject to the restrictions of this Protective Order, counsel for the receiving 

party and the designated and identified expert(s) who are allowed access to source code designated 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 10 of 25
-9- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY under this 

Protective Order agree that the text of the source code or portions of the code itself shall not be 

disclosed to any other person at any time other than otherwise provided under this Protective Order 

and the information gained from access to or review of the source code shall not be used for any 

purpose or reasons other than for the purposes of this litigation. 

6. Additional Restrictions. 

6.1 Documents or information designated CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO 

PROTECTIVE ORDER, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE-OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY information (collectively, 

“Protected Information”) shall be disclosed by the recipient thereof only to those appropriate 

categories of individuals listed in ¶ 4 and its subparts above, subject to the restrictions therein. 

Additionally, the attorneys at Outside Counsel defined above shall not be provided access to 

material designated either HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE-OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY if such attorneys currently 

participate in, direct, or supervise any patent prosecution activity involving technology relating to 

website search engines or methods for accessing files in a data storage system of a computer system 

(the “Subject Matter”). During the pendency of this litigation, and for one year after the full and 

final conclusion of this litigation, including all appeals, those attorneys at Outside Counsel who are 

provided access to material designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY and/or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE-OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY will not 

participate in, direct or supervise any patent prosecution activity in the United States Patent and 

Trademark Office or with any patent office outside the United States involving the Subject Matter. 

6.2 If Protected Information initially produced pursuant to this Protective Order is 

disclosed to any person(s) other than in the manner authorized hereunder, the party responsible for 

the unauthorized disclosure shall immediately bring all pertinent facts related to such unauthorized 

disclosure to the attention of counsel of record for the initial producing party and, without prejudice 

to other rights and remedies of the initial producing party, shall make all reasonable efforts to 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 11 of 25
-10- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

retrieve the information and to prevent any further disclosure thereof by the person(s) who received 

such information on an unauthorized basis. 

7. Redaction. 

Counsel for a party producing documents may mask (i.e., "redact") material deemed exempt 

from discovery because it is protected from disclosure under the attorney-client privilege or work 

product immunity afforded by Rule 26(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. However, any document from which 

material is masked must identify in the masked area that masking or redaction has occurred. The 

reason for any such masking must be stated on a privilege log to be provided in accordance with any 

governing rules or agreements. Sufficient information regarding the masked material must be 

provided on the privilege log to enable the other party to evaluate the legitimacy of the asserted 

privilege or immunity. The parties reserve the right to pursue categories for redaction in addition to 

those identified above in this paragraph, by either consent of the parties or order of the Court, to be 

addressed on a case-by-case basis. 

8. Disclosure To Independent Consultants And Identification of Experts. 

8.1 If any party desires to disclose Protected Information to any expert or consultant 

pursuant to ¶ 4 and its subparts above, it must first identify in writing to the attorneys for the 

producing party each such expert or consultant. The attorney for the producing party shall have ten 

(10) business days from receipt of such notice to object to disclosure of such information to any of 

the experts or consultants so identified. If no objection is made within the allotted time frame, such 

expert or consultant is deemed entitled to receive the designating party’s Protected Information. 

8.2 Such identification shall include: (i) the full name, professional title and professional 

address and/or affiliation of the proposed expert or consultant; (ii) an up-to-date curriculum vitae 

identifying at least all other present and prior employments or consultancies of the expert or 

consultant; (iii) a list of the cases in which the expert or consultant has testified at a deposition or at 

trial within the last four years; and (iv) an executed copy of Exhibit A of this Protective Order. The 

parties shall attempt to resolve any objections informally. If the objections cannot be resolved, the 

party seeking to disclose the Protected Information to the expert or consultant may move the Court 

for an order allowing the disclosure. On any motion seeking the disclosure of such information to 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 12 of 25
-11- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

an expert or consultant, the burden of proof shall lie with the party objecting to the disclosure to 

establish that the information should not be disclosed to the expert or consultant. In the event 

objections are made and not resolved informally, disclosure of information to the expert or 

consultant shall not be made except by order of the Court (or to any limited extent upon which the 

parties may agree). 

9. Agreement Of Confidentiality. 

9.1 In no event shall any Protected Information be disclosed to any person otherwise 

authorized pursuant to ¶ 4.1 (c ) or ¶ 4.2 (c) unless and until such a person has first executed a 

written Agreement to Protect Confidentiality (in the form set forth in Exhibit A hereto) 

acknowledging and agreeing to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order. Executed copies of 

such Agreement to Protect Confidentiality shall be promptly served on the producing party. 

10. Related Documents. 

10.1 Protected Information shall include: (a) all documents, copies, extracts, and complete 

or partial summaries prepared from or containing such information; (b) portions of deposition 

transcripts and exhibits thereto which contain or reflect the content of any such documents, copies, 

extracts, or summaries; (c) portions of briefs, memoranda or any other papers filed with the Court 

and exhibits thereto which contain or reflect the content of any such documents, copies, extracts, or 

summaries; (d) deposition testimony designated in accordance with ¶ 11 and its subparts below; and 

(e) testimony taken at a hearing or other proceeding that is designated in accordance with ¶ 12 

below. 

10.2 With the exception of source code subject to ¶ 5 and its subparts above, nothing 

herein shall restrict a qualified recipient from making working copies, abstracts, digests or analyses 

of Protected Information for use in connection with this litigation, and such working copies, 

abstracts, digests and analyses shall be deemed to have the same level of protection under the terms 

of this Protective Order. Further, with the exception of source code subject to ¶ 5 and its subparts 

above, nothing herein shall restrict a qualified recipient from converting or translating such 

Protected Information into machine-readable form for incorporation into a data retrieval system used 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 13 of 25
-12- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

in connection with this litigation, provided that access to such information, in whatever form stored 

or reproduced, shall be limited to qualified recipients. 

11. Designation Of Deposition Transcripts. 

11.1 Deposition transcripts, or portions thereof, may be designated as subject to this 

Protective Order either: (a) at the time of such deposition, in which case the transcript of the 

designated testimony shall be marked by the reporter with the appropriate legend (see ¶ 2 and its 

subparts) as the designating party may direct, or (b) within twenty-one (21) days following the 

receipt of the transcript of the deposition by providing written notice to the reporter and all counsel 

of record, in which case all counsel receiving such notice shall mark the copies or portions of the 

designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the designating party. 

11.2 All deposition transcripts not previously designated shall be deemed to be, and shall 

be treated as, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY until the expiration of the 

period set forth in ¶ 11.1 above, and neither the transcript nor the content of the testimony shall be 

disclosed by a non-designating party to persons other than those persons named or approved 

according to ¶ 4 and its subparts above. The designating party shall have the right to exclude from a 

deposition, before the taking of testimony which the designating party designates as Protected 

Information and subject to this Protective Order, all persons other than those persons previously 

qualified to receive such information pursuant to ¶ 4 and its subparts above. The failure of such 

persons to leave a deposition whenever such a request is made under this paragraph shall justify 

counsel in instructing the witness that he or she shall not answer any question that counsel 

reasonably believes will elicit the disclosure of Protected Information. 

12. Designation Of Hearing Testimony Or Argument. 

With respect to testimony elicited during hearings and other proceedings, whenever counsel 

for any party deems that any question or line of questioning calls for the disclosure of Protected 

Information, counsel may designate on the record prior to such disclosure that the disclosure is 

subject to confidentiality restrictions. 

13. Designation And Use Of Documents Under Seal. 

With respect to the filing of documents containing Protected Information with the Court, the 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 14 of 25
-13- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

parties shall comply with Civil L.R. 79-5 and the Court’s Standing Order for Cases Involving Sealed 

or Confidential Documents. 

14. Confidentiality Of Party's Own Documents. 

No person may disclose, in public or private, any designated information of another party 

except as provided for in this Protective Order, but nothing herein shall affect the right of the 

designating party to disclose to its officers, directors, employees, attorneys, consultants or experts, 

or to any other person, its own information or Protected Information, irrespective of whether such 

information has been filed under seal by the opposing party. Such disclosure shall not waive the 

protections of this Protective Order and shall not entitle other parties or their attorneys to disclose 

such information in violation of it, unless by such disclosure of the designating party the information 

becomes public knowledge (see ¶ 17 below). 

15. Other Protections. 

15.1 No person shall use any Protected Information, or information derived therefrom, for 

purposes other than the prosecution or defense of this action, including without limitation, for 

purposes of preparing, filing, or prosecuting any patent application, continuation or divisional patent 

application, reissue patent application, or request for re-examination. 

15.2 Any party may mark any document or thing containing Protected Information as an 

exhibit to a deposition, hearing, or other proceeding and examine any witness thereon qualified 

under the terms of this Protective Order to have access to such designated material. 

16. Challenge To Confidentiality. 

16.1 This Protective Order shall not preclude any party from seeking and obtaining, on an 

appropriate showing, such additional protection with respect to the confidentiality of documents or 

other discovery materials as that party may consider appropriate. Nor shall any party be precluded 

from: (a) claiming that any matter designated hereunder is not entitled to the protections of this 

Protective Order, (b) applying to the Court for an Order permitting the disclosure or use of 

information or documents otherwise prohibited by this Protective Order, or (c) applying for a further 

Order modifying this Protective Order in any respect. No party shall be obligated to challenge the 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 15 of 25
-14- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

propriety of any designation and failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge to the 

propriety of such designation. 

16.2 If a party seeks declassification or removal of particular items from a designation on 

the ground that such designation is not necessary to protect the interests of the party seeking the 

designated information, the following procedure shall be utilized: 

(a) The party seeking such declassification or removal shall give counsel of 

record for the other party written notice thereof specifying the designated information as to which 

such removal is sought and the reasons for the request; 

(b) The designating party shall have 15 days from the receipt of such notice to 

withdraw its designation or provide the reasons it believes the designation is appropriate and the 

parties shall thereafter meet and confer in an attempt to resolve any remaining dispute; 

(c) If, after conferring, the parties cannot reach agreement concerning the matter, 

then the party requesting the declassification or removal of particular items may file and serve a 

motion for a further Order of this Court directing that the designation shall be so removed. 

On any motion challenging the designation of any information, the burden of proof shall lie 

with the designating party to establish that the information is, in fact, Protected Information. 

17. Prior Or Public Knowledge. 

This Protective Order shall not apply to information that, prior to disclosure, is public 

knowledge, and the restrictions contained in this Protective Order shall not apply to information that 

is, or after disclosure becomes, public knowledge other than by an act or omission of the party to 

whom such disclosure is made, or that is legitimately and independently acquired from a source not 

subject to this Protective Order. 

18. Limitation Of Protective Order. 

This Protective Order is not intended to address discovery objections on the grounds of 

attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine, or to preclude any party from seeking further 

relief or protective orders from the Court as may be appropriate under the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 16 of 25
-15- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

19. Other Proceedings. 

By entering this Protective Order and limiting the disclosure of information in this action, the 

Court does not intend to preclude another court from finding that information may be relevant and 

subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or party covered by this Order who may be 

subjected to a subpoena or other judicial process calling for disclosure of a designating party’s 

Protected Information in another case shall: 1) object to the production of such Protected 

Information on the ground of this Protective Order; and 2) provide prompt written notice to the 

producing party within five (5) business days of receiving the subpoena. Unless within 30 days of 

service of such notification, the producing party applies for an order from a court of competent 

jurisdiction precluding the receiving party from complying with such subpoena, the receiving party 

shall be free to produce the Protected Information. If the producing party applies for such an order, 

then the disclosure of the information shall not occur until the court rules on such an order or until 

the receiving party is directed by a court of competent jurisdiction to produce the subject materials. 

20. Inadvertent Or Unintentional Disclosure Of Work Product Or Privileged 

Information: Procedure And Waiver. 

20.1 Inadvertent Disclosure. If the producing party at any time notifies the receiving 

party in writing that it has inadvertently produced documents and/or things that are protected from 

disclosure under attorney-client privilege, work-product immunity, and/or any other applicable 

privilege or immunity from disclosure, the receiving party shall return all copies of such documents 

and/or things to the producing party within five (5) business days of receipt of such notice and shall 

not further disclose or use such items for any purpose until further order of the Court. Upon being 

notified by the producing party pursuant to this section, counsel for the receiving party shall use his 

or her best efforts to retrieve all copies of the documents at issue. 

20.2 The return of any discovery item to the producing party shall not in any way preclude 

the discovering parties from moving the Court for a ruling that: (a) the document or thing was never 

privileged or otherwise immune from disclosure; and/or (b) that any applicable privilege or 

immunity has been waived. 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 17 of 25
-16- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

20.3 Unauthorized Disclosure. If a receiving party learns that it has disclosed Protected 

Information to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Protective Order, the 

receiving party must: (i) immediately notify in the writing the designating party of the unauthorized 

disclosures; (ii) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Information; (iii) inform the 

persons or person to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Protective 

Order and (iv) request such person or persons execute the Agreement to Protect Confidential 

Information attached hereto as Exhibit A. Nothing stated herein shall prevent the designating party 

from seeking appropriate relief for violation of this Protective Order. 

20.4 Status Of Protected Information. Unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure does not 

change the status of Protected Information. Inadvertent or unintentional disclosure of information 

subject to any privilege or immunity during the course of this litigation without proper designation 

shall not be deemed a waiver of a claim that disclosed information is in fact subject to a privilege or 

immunity if so designated within ten (10) business days after the producing party actually learns of 

the inadvertent or unintentional disclosure. 

21. Non-Party Material. 

21.1 The terms of this Protective Order, as well as the terms of any other protective order 

that may be entered into between a receiving party and a non-party for the production of information 

to the receiving party, are applicable to Protected Information provided by a non-party. Information 

provided by a non-party in connection with this action and designated as Protected Information 

pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order shall be protected by the remedies and relief provided 

by this Protective Order. At the time discovery is requested of any non-party, the receiving party’s 

counsel of record shall provide to the non-party a copy of this Order. In addition, counsel for the 

receiving party shall ensure that copies of any documents or other materials produced by any nonparty are promptly provided to outside counsel of record for all parties in this action. 

21.2 If discovery calls for the production of information subject to a confidentiality or 

non-disclosure agreement between the producing party and a non-party, the producing party shall 

give notice within fourteen (14) days to the non-party that such information is subject to discovery 

in this action, and shall provide the non-party with a copy of this Protective Order. If the non-party 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 18 of 25
-17- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

either does not respond or refuses to consent to disclosure of the requested information, the burden 

shall be on the producing party to seek relief from the appropriate court that will allow for disclosure 

to be made. 

22. Return Of Designated Information. 

Within thirty (30) days of final termination of this action, unless otherwise agreed to in 

writing by an attorney of record for the designating party, each party shall assemble and return, or 

certify destruction of, all materials containing information of another party designated as Protected 

Information, including all copies, extracts and summaries thereof, to the party from whom the 

designated material was obtained, except that: (a) any documents or copies which contain, 

constitute or reflect attorney’s work product or attorney-client privilege communications, and (b) 

archive copies of pleadings, motion papers, deposition transcripts, correspondence and written 

discovery responses may be retained by counsel. 

23. Waiver Or Termination Of Order. 

No part of the restrictions imposed by this Protective Order may be waived or terminated, 

except by written stipulation executed by counsel of record for each designating party, or by an 

order of the Court for good cause shown. 

24. Modification Of Order; Prior Agreements. 

This Protective Order may be modified, and any matter related to it may be resolved, by 

written stipulation of the parties without further order of the Court. To the extent the terms of this 

Protective Order conflict with any agreement among the parties regarding the confidentiality of 

particular documents or information entered into before the date of this Protective Order, the terms 

of this Protective Order shall govern. 

25. Section Captions. 

The title captions for each section of this Protective Order are for convenience only and are 

not intended to affect or alter the text of the sections or the substance of the Order. 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 19 of 25
-18- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DATED: December 5, 2007 HENNIGAN BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Alan P. Block 

 Alan P. Block 

Attorneys for Plaintiff SPEEDTRACK, INC. 

DATED: December 5, 2007 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 

By: /s/ Steven M. Bauer 

 Steven M. Bauer 

Attorneys for Defendants ENDECA 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and WAL-MART 

STORES 

DATED: December 5, 2007 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP 

By: /s/ Andrew Leibnitz 

 Andrew Leibnitz 

Attorneys for Defendants WAL-MART 

STORES 

ORDER 

So Ordered this _____ day of ____________________, 2007. 

United States District Judge 

7th December

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 20 of 25
-19- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO 

GENERAL ORDER NO. 45, XB – ELECTRONIC CASE FILING 

The undersigned hereby attests that he/she has obtained the concurrence in the filing of this 

document from each signatory whose ECF User ID and Password is not utilized in the electronic 

filing of this document. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

 /s/ Alan P. Block

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 21 of 25
-20- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

EXHIBIT “A” 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SPEEDTRACK, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 06-CV-07336-PJH 

AGREEMENT TO PROTECT 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 

ENDECA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Intervenor, 

 vs. 

SPEEDTRACK, INC., 

 Defendant in Intervention.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

My name is __________________________. My home address is 

____________________________________________________________________. I am 

employed as (state position) ______________________________ at (state name and address of 

employer) _____________________________________________________________________ 

__________________________________________________. 

1. I have read the Protective Order and a copy of it has been given to me. I understand 

the provisions of this Order, and agree to comply with and to be bound by its provisions. I 

understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment 

in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information 

or item that is subject to this Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance 

with the provisions of this Protective Order. 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 22 of 25
-21- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California for adjudication of any dispute regarding my compliance with the 

terms of this Protective Order. 

3. I hereby appoint _____________________________________ of 

________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________as my 

California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to 

enforcement of this Protective Order. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the law of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed this ______ day of _________________, _______, at _____________________, 

_____________________ [City and State where sworn and signed]. 

_________________________________ 

[Signature] 

636718\v1 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 23 of 25
-22- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) 

 ) SS. 

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) 

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 

years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 865 South Figueroa Street, 

Suite 2900, Los Angeles, California 90017. 

On December 5, 2007, I served a copy of the within document(s) described as follows: 

REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE TREATMENT OF CONFIDENTIAL 

INFORMATION on the interested parties in this action by transmitting via United States District 

Court for the Northern District of California Electronic Case Filing Program the document listed 

above by uploading the electronic files for each of the above listed document(s) on this date, 

addressed as set forth on the attached service list. 

PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LIST 

The above-described document was also transmitted to the parties indicated below, by 

Federal Express only: 

Chambers of the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton 

USDC, San Francisco Division 

Attn: Regarding SpeedTrack Litigation 

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

San Francisco, CA 94102-3483 

3 copies

I am readily familiar with Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman LLP’s practice in its Los Angeles 

office for the collection and processing of federal express with Federal Express. 

Executed on December 5, 2007, at Los Angeles, California. 

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of this bar of this court at whose 

direction the service was made. 

/s/ Yoshie Botta 

Yoshie Botta 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 24 of 25
-23- 

06-CV-07336-PJH REVISED, AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SERVICE LIST 

Roderick M. Thompson (rthompson@fbm.com) 

Andrew Leibnitz (aleibnitz@fbm.com) 

Stephanie P. Skaff (sskaff@fbm.com) 

Cory M. Mason (cmason@fbm.com) 

FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 954-4400 

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant, 

WAL-MART STORES, INC. 

Steven M. Bauer (sbauer@proskauer.com) 

Richard B. Myrus (rmyrus@proskauer.com) 

Colin G. Cabral (ccabral@proskauer.com) 

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 

One International Place, 22nd Floor 

Boston, MA 02110 

Telephone: (617) 526-9700 

Facsimile: (617) 526-9899 

Attorneys for ENDECA 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Complainant-in-Intervention 

Jonathan E. Rich (jrich@proskauer.com) 

PROSKAUER ROSE, LLP 

2049 Century Park East, Suite 3200 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206 

Telephone: (310) 557-2900 

Facsimile: (310) 557-2193 

Attorneys for ENDECA 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Complainant-in-Intervention 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 112 Filed 12/07/07 Page 25 of 25