Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00838/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00838-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1The United States Postal Service returned the August 16 order as undeliverable on September 16, 2005. A

notation on the envelope stated that plaintiff could not be located. However, absent notice of a new address, service

at a party’s prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS HENDON,

Plaintiff,

v.

BAROYA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-00838-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DIRECTING

PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH ORDER OF

AUGUST 16 WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Docs. 5 and 7)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

RE-SERVE ORDER OF AUGUST 16

(Doc. 5)

Plaintiff Carlos Hendon (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 16, 2005, the court issued an order requiring

plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full or file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis

within thirty days. On October 19, 2005, after plaintiff failed to comply with or otherwise respond

to the court’s order, the court issued a Findings and Recommendations recommending dismissal of

this action for failure to obey a court order.1 Plaintiff filed an objection on October 31, 2005. 

In the objection, plaintiff states he was transferred between several institutions during the

relevant time period, including a mental hospital, and did not receive the court’s order of August 16.

///

Case 1:05-cv-00838-OWW -SMS Document 9 Filed 11/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff alleges he was heavily medicated and encountered difficulties obtaining access to his legal

property and legal supplies. In the interest of justice, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 19, 2005, is VACATED;

2. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order to comply with

the court’s order of August 16, 2005;

3. The Clerk’s Office shall re-serve the order of August 16 on plaintiff; and

4. The failure to comply with the court’s order of August 16 within thirty days will

result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 28, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00838-OWW -SMS Document 9 Filed 11/29/05 Page 2 of 2