Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171-47/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

OKI AMERICA, INC., ET AL., 

 PLAINTIFF, 

VS. 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 DEFENDANT. 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE

BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 COUNTERCLAIMANT, 

VS. 

OKI AMERICA, INC., OKI ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRY CO., LTD., OKI DATA 

CORPORATION AND OKI DATA AMERICAS,

INC., 

 COUNTER-DEFENDANTS. 

On September 14, 2006, Oki filed its Motion to Strike Smith Report and Portions of 

Neikirk Report Under Daubert and its Motion to Grant Partial Summary Judgment of NonInfringement of the ‘678 Patent Based on (1) Lack of Photoresist on Back of Wafer and (2) 

Striking Expert Report Under Daubert. In support of both motions, Oki also filed the 

Declaration of Dr. Richard B. Fair. 

The deadline for AMD to file its opposition to both motions is October 5, 2006. 

AMD’s expert, Dr. Bruce Smith, has been and is currently in Japan on an unrelated matter. 

Due to travel, complications with internet access, time differences, etc. Dr. Smith will not 

be able to coordinate filing a declaration in rebuttal to Dr. Fair’s by the current deadline. 

AMD is seeking (with stipulation by Oki) a one-week extension of time for the remaining 

briefing on these two motions so that Dr. Smith may file a rebuttal declaration. As the 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 487 Filed 10/10/06 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

hearing on these motions is currently set for November 3, 2006, such an extension should 

not affect the hearing date. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between all parties that, 

subject to approval by this Court, the time for filing and serving oppositions and replies to 

Oki’s Motion to Strike Smith Report and Portions of Neikirk Report Under Daubert and 

Motion to Grant Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of the ‘678 Patent Based 

on (1) Lack of Photoresist on Back of Wafer and (2) Striking Expert Report Under Daubert

is changed as follows: 

(1) AMD’s oppositions to the above motions must be filed and served on or 

before October 12, 2006; and 

(2) Oki’s replies to the above motions must be filed and served on or before 

October 26, 2006. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: October 4, 2006 VINSON & ELKINS, LLP 

/s/ Adam V. Floyd

 Adam V. Floyd 

Attorney for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD & 

EVANS, PLLC 

/s/ J. C. Rozendaal

 J.C. Rozendaal 

Attorney for Oki America, et al. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:__________________________ _______________________________________ 

 Charles R. Breyer 

 United States District Judge 

October 6, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 487 Filed 10/10/06 Page 2 of 2