Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01956/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01956-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURIE SUE DRAKE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1956 DFL DAD PS

vs.

WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, L.L.P., ORDER

Defendant.

 /

On February 27, 2007, plaintiff filed a document titled “Notice to Dismiss Case.” 

Plaintiff cannot dismiss this action by notice because defendant filed an answer to plaintiff’s

complaint on September 1, 2006. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). The court invited defendant’s

response to the notice construed as a request for dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2). Defendant

objects to dismissal of the case without prejudice unless the court orders plaintiff to pay

defendant’s costs and fees. Plaintiff has not agreed to such a condition. Plaintiff’s February 27,

2007 notice to dismiss case will therefore be disregarded. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 5, 2007.

DAD:kw

DDad1\orders.prose\drake1956.ntc.disregard

Case 2:06-cv-01956-RRB-DAD Document 33 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 1