Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-91-04051/USCOURTS-ca10-91-04051-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

FILED 

United States Co-μrt <?f Appeals Tenth C1rcu1t 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP O 4 1991 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

CHARLES CHAPMAN THAMER, II, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v. 

JOHN NEIGHBORS, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 91-4051 

(D.C. No. 90-CV-1064) 

(D. Utah) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before McKAY, SEYMOUR, and EBEL, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs, this panel has determined 

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the 

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th 

Cir. R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without 

oral argument. 

There is no allegation that the defendant was required to 

proceed to trial in his prison uniform, 1 and in the absence of any 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

1 As best as can be determined from the record, his complaint is 

that he was required to appear in prison garb at the preliminary 

hearing. 

Appellate Case: 91-4051 Document: 010110084265 Date Filed: 09/04/1991 Page: 1 
such allegation, we AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the District 

Court's Order of February 28, 1991, including the Report and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate filed January 31, 

1991. 

Entered for the Court: 

David M. Ebel 

Circuit Judge 

- 2 -

Appellate Case: 91-4051 Document: 010110084265 Date Filed: 09/04/1991 Page: 2