Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-5_19-cv-00265/USCOURTS-ared-5_19-cv-00265-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

PINE BLUFF DIVISION 

ORDER 

The Court has reviewed the Partial Recommendation submitted by United States 

Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. (Doc. Nos. 10, 22.) After conducting 

a de novo review, this Court adopts the Partial Recommendation with one exception. 

In his Objections, Plaintiff alleges that, “to keep costs down,” Defendant Correct Care 

Solutions has a policy and/or practice of “not purchas[ing] expensive equipment such as 

wheelchairs, walkers, [and] crutches [and] to deny such aids whenever possible.” (Doc. No. 22 

at 3.) This added allegation is sufficient to plead a plausible claim against Defendant Correct 

Care Solutions, and it is hereby incorporated by reference into the Amended Complaint. (Doc. 

No. 8.) 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff may proceed with his § 1983 Eighth Amendment, ADA, and RA claims 

against Defendants Horan, Chism, Moore, Clark, McCoy, Page, Griffin, and Correct Care 

Solutions. 

2. All other claims against all other defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

 3. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal 

NICHOLAS HOLLIS, PLAINTIFF

ADC #114535 

 

v. 5:19-cv-00265-JM-JJV 

ARKANSAS BOARD OF CORRECTION, et al. DEFENDANTS

Case 5:19-cv-00265-JM Document 25 Filed 12/05/19 Page 1 of 2
from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 

Dated this 5th day of December 2019. 

 ________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:19-cv-00265-JM Document 25 Filed 12/05/19 Page 2 of 2