Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03894/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03894-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS—No. C-06-03894 RMW

MAG

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 3/19/08

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

In re MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP

LTD. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

This Documents Relates To:

 All Actions

No. C-06-03894 RMW

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

[Re Docket No. 31]

Defendant Marvell Technology Group Ltd. ("Marvell") filed a motion to dismiss the

complaint for lack of standing on January 16, 2007. Docket No. 31. Since that motion was filed, the

parties have stipulated numerous times to continue the briefing schedule and hearing dates on the

motion to dismiss. As a result of the parties' stipulations, the motion has still not been heard or even

fully briefed.

On January 18, 2008, the parties filed a request that the court stay the proceedings following

a mediation conducted by United States District Court Judge Layn Phillips (Ret.), which request the

court granted on January 25, 2008. On March 6, 2008, the parties submitted a joint statement on the

progress of settlement negotiations between them. The joint statement included a request to

continue the stay of the proceedings in light of the fact that they have recently signed a

memorandum of understanding memorializing an agreement to resolve this matter. 

Case 5:06-cv-03894-RMW Document 76 Filed 03/19/08 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS—No. C-06-03894 RMW

MAG 2

In light of the status of the case, the court hereby denies Marvell's motion to dismiss without

prejudice. Marvell may re-file its motion at a later date, if necessary.

DATED: 3/18/08

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-03894-RMW Document 76 Filed 03/19/08 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS—No. C-06-03894 RMW

MAG 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

Darren J. Robbins 

Travis E. Downs, III travisd@lerachlaw.com 

William S. Lerach e_file_sf@lerachlaw.com 

Edmund Wilson Searby esearby@mcdonaldhopkins.com 

Walter W. Noss wnoss@scott-scott.com 

Arthur L. Shingler, III ashingler@scott-scott.com 

David R. Scott drscott@scott-scott.com 

Denise V. Zamore dzamore@scott-scott.com 

Avin P. Sharma aps@classcounsel.com 

Robert S. Green RSG@CLASSCOUNSEL.COM 

William B. Federman wfederman@aol.com 

Counsel for Defendants:

Bruce A. Ericson bruce.ericson@pillsburylaw.com 

Andrew D. Lanphere alanphere@pillsburywinthrop.com 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 3/19/08 /s/ MAG

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:06-cv-03894-RMW Document 76 Filed 03/19/08 Page 3 of 3