Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00745/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00745-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1 

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND ANSWER DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KAUFMAN DOLOWICH & VOLUCK LLP 

KATHERINE S. CATLOS, ESQ. SBN 184227 

kcatlos@kdvlaw.com

351 California Street, Suite 500 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 402-0059 

Facsimile: (415) 402-0679 

 

Attorneys for Cross-Defendant JERRY PAJOUH ENTERPRISES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WILLIAM TRANQUILLI, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

VINCENT and CLAUDINE NOVAK, as 

Trustees of the VINCENT and CLAUDINE 

NOVAK Trust, 

Defendants, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 1:07-CV-745-OWW-NEW 

ACTION FILED: May 21, 2007 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

LAST DAY FOR CROSS-DEFENDANTS 

TO RESPOND TO CROSS COMPLAINT 

 

Plaintiff WILLIAM TRANQUILLI; Defendants/Cross-Complainants, VINCENT and 

CLAUDINE NOVAK, as Trustees of the VINCENT and CLAUDINE NOVAK Trust; CrossDefendant HT BROOKS; and Cross-Defendant JERRY PAJOUH ENTERPRISES, INC., 

through their respective counsel, hereby Stipulate as follows: 

1. On October 18, 2007, an ADA site inspection of the subject property was conducted; 

2. Plaintiff’s ADA expert is currently in trial proceedings as a witness in an unrelated matter 

and requires two to three weeks to provide a report regarding alleged ADA violations and 

proposed structural changes per the site inspection; 

3. Plaintiff’s ADA expert’s report is required in order to finalize any settlement agreement; 

4. Plaintiff’s, Cross-Defendants’, and Defendants/Cross-Complainants’ counsels agreed to 

provide Cross-Defendants until November 30, 2007 to respond to the Cross Complaint 

pending these settlement discussions; 

5. Because the parties are awaiting for Plaintiff’s expert’s ADA report before potentially 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00745-OWW -GSA Document 15 Filed 10/24/07 Page 1 of 3
2 

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND ANSWER DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

finalizing a settlement agreement, the parties jointly request that Cross-Defendants’ 

deadline to respond to the Cross Complaint be extended for thirty (30) days. Thus, 

Cross-Defendants’ response would be due on November 30, 2007. 

6. The parties respectfully request that the Court order the responsive pleading be due on 

November 30, 2007, based on the above stipulations. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED: 

Dated: THOMAS NELSON STEWART, III, 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

 

By: __________________________________ 

Thomas Nelson Stewart, III, Esq. 

Attorney for Plaintiff WILLIAM TRANQUILLI 

Dated: PEEL, GARCIA & STAMPER LLP

 

By: __________________________________ 

James W. Peel, Esq. 

Attorneys for Defendants and Cross-Defendants 

VINCENT and CLAUDINE NOVAK, as Trustees of 

the VINCENT and CLAUDINE NOVAK Trust 

Dated: THOMAS NAST, ATTORNEY AT LAW 

By: __________________________________ 

Thomas Nast, Esq. 

Attorney for Cross Defendant HT BROOKS 

Dated: KAUFMAN DOLOWICH & VOLUCK LLP

 

By: __________________________________ 

Katherine S. Catlos, Esq. 

Attorneys for Cross-Defendant 

JERRY PAJOUH ENTERPRISES, INC. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00745-OWW -GSA Document 15 Filed 10/24/07 Page 2 of 3
3 

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND ANSWER DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

It is hereby ordered: 

Cross-Defendants have until November 30, 2007 to respond to the Cross Complaints. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 24, 2007 By: /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER 

Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 

Judge of the United States District Court 

Eastern District of California 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00745-OWW -GSA Document 15 Filed 10/24/07 Page 3 of 3