Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00284/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00284-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 On September 11, 2006, the Findings and Recommendations were returned to the Court as undeliverable 1

due to the death of Petitioner. (Court Doc. 20.) 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDUARDO PORAS,

Petitioner,

v.

JAMES YATES, Warden

Respondent.

 /

CV F 05-00284 OWW DLB HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

PETITION AS MOOT

[Doc. 19] 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 29, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that the

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED as MOOT. This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed 1

and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the

Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

///

Case 1:05-cv-00284-OWW -DLB Document 21 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued August 29, 2006, is ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as MOOT; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action/enter judgment for

Respondent. This terminates this action in its entirety.IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 13, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00284-OWW -DLB Document 21 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 2