Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05025/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05025-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLORIA GRENING WOLK,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PHILIP R. GREEN,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-5025 BZ

DISCOVERY ORDER

Following a hearing at which Mrs. Wolk appeared pro se

and defendant appeared through Julian Pardo De Zela, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. To the extent there are any requests to continue the

trial or the other pretrial dates set forth in my Order dated

September 29, 2007, those requests are DENIED. The court

expects trial to commence on May 19, 2008. 

2. For the reasons explained at length on the record,

plaintiff’s Motion For Leave To File Third Amended Complaint

is DENIED.

3. For the reasons explained on the record, plaintiff’s

Motion For Leave To File Additional Interrogatories, which the

court interprets to require the factual basis for each

Case 3:06-cv-05025-BZ Document 113 Filed 12/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

affirmative defense, is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer the

second set of interrogatories by December 19, 2007. 

4. Based on Mrs. Wolk’s representations that

Interrogatories 15-17 and Requests for Admission 16-19 can be

answered by reference to documents that defendant filed in the

San Francisco Superior Court action, defendant is ORDERED to

provide further answers to those interrogatories and requests

for admission by December 19, 2007. Mr. De Zela is ORDERED to

call Mrs. Wolk this afternoon at 3:00 p.m. Pacific Standard

Time to satisfy himself that Mrs. Wolk is seeking discovery

with respect to matters contained in documents filed with the

court. The court further suggests that defendant, if he has

not already done so, obtain a copy of whatever record the

Superior Court made of the hearing.

5. Henceforth, any telephonic, facsimile, or e-mail

communication between plaintiff and any counsel for defendant

shall be acknowledged by the recipient within 24 hours. If

the acknowledgment is not a response, it shall state by when a

response will be made. 

6. The Orders To Show Cause dated October 26, 2007 and

November 8, 2007 are DISCHARGED. The parties are admonished

in the future to comply faithfully with the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, the Civil Local Rules and this court’s orders

on pain of sanction.

Dated: December 5, 2007

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\WOLK\DISCOVERY ORDER12.5.07.wpd

Case 3:06-cv-05025-BZ Document 113 Filed 12/05/07 Page 2 of 2