Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-06-07905/USCOURTS-ca4-06-07905-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7905

JAMES A. BUTLER, 

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SHEARIN, Warden; A W BOGDAN; BRADFORD; MECCA; BOYCE; NURSE

SMITH; ELAYAN; FORSTER, PA; L. LONG; SOE HART; COX; COSGROVE;

W M PUGH; OFFICER DUVALL; MCGORTY, FS Admin; NAVELANCY, A-2

Counselor; LAMBERT; SIGNES; MR. SERVOSS, Assistant Food

Services Manager; WHITTINGTON, A-1 Unit Secretary; CORRECTIONS

OFFICER SMITH; R. COSGROVE; W. COX; MARBARUK, Clinical

Director; S. DEWALT, Warden, sued in their individual and

official capacity; DAVID EZEKIAL, A-1 Unit Manager; JONES, A-1

Unit Officer, 

Defendants - Appellees,

and

H. SERVICES ADMINISTRATION; NURSE WILLIAMS; CLINICAL DIRECTOR;

S. CRUMP; MOST; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE, Jr.; T. HART; SOE; ELAWAN;

J. BANEY, 

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William N. Nickerson, Senior District

Judge. (1:04-cv-02496-WMN)

Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 27, 2008

Appeal: 06-7905 Doc: 56 Filed: 05/27/2008 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United

States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney,

Ariana Wright Arnold, Neil Ray White, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Jennifer Wright Schick, Assistant

United States Attorney, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 06-7905 Doc: 56 Filed: 05/27/2008 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Butler v.

Shearin, No. 1:04-cv-02496-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 06-7905 Doc: 56 Filed: 05/27/2008 Pg: 3 of 3