Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06761/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06761-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOSEA BYRD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCHREDNITZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06761-AWI-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 9)

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION

Hosea Byrd (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro

se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On May 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On June 9, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:04-cv-06761-AWI-LJO Document 16 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis. While the

plaintiff offers an basic “objection” to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations, plaintiff’s objections provide no

additional information or analysis. Plaintiff has failed to

show that this action concerns anything more than Plaintiff’s

classification, which, for the reasons stated by the Magistrate

Judge, does not state a basis for civil rights relief. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 19, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06761-AWI-LJO Document 16 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2