Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00014/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00014-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 On September 13, 2006, plaintiff filed a request to file objections out of time. 

However, that request was directed to the findings and recommendations issued July 26, 2006. 

Moreover, plaintiff’s previous request for additional time to file objections to the July 26, 2006

recommendations was denied as futile. (September 12, 2006 Order at 2.) Because the court is

adopting the August 28, 2006 findings and recommendations, plaintiff’s September 13, 2006

request will also be denied as futile.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

A. DAVIES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-0014 LKK JFM P

vs.

Dr. K. LOW, 

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 28, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1

Case 2:03-cv-00014-LKK -JFM Document 92 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 28, 2006 are adopted in full; 

2. Defendant’s November 18, 2005 motion for summary judgment is granted; and

3. Plaintiff’s September 13, 2006 request is denied.

DATED: September 28, 2006

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/davi0014.801

Case 2:03-cv-00014-LKK -JFM Document 92 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 2