Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Robert J. Lauson, Esq, Bar No. 175,486 

Edward C. Schewe, Esq, Bar No. 143,554 

LAUSON & SCHEWE LLP 

1600 Rosecrans Avenue, 4th Floor 

Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 

Tel. (310) 321-7890 

Fax (310) 321-7891 

Email: bob@lauson.com 

 ed@lauson.com 

Attorneys for Defendants,

AROA MARKETING, INC. and 

SKYMALL, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

STORUS CORPORATION,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

RESTORATION HARDWARE, 

INC., et al.,

 Defendants,

and related counterclaims.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: CV 06-2454 MMC (MEJ) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

ENLARGE TIME PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 6-3 

Date:

Time:

Judge: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

[PROPOSED] Order Granting Def.’s Motion to Enlarge Time 

Case No. CV 06-2454 MMC (MEJ) 

; DIRECTIONS TO

DEFENDANTS

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 236 Filed 02/21/08 Page 1 of 2
This motion comes before the Court to enlarge time for Defendants to 

respond to a motion in limine filed by Plaintiff Storus Corporation. After 

consideration of the parties’ written submissions and any other arguments of 

counsel for the parties, the Court finds and concludes that: 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Good Cause Exists for Defendants’ motion to enlarge time to respond to 

Plaintiff “Storus’ Motion In Limine To Exclude Evidence Of Design And Sales 

Data, Or Alternatively For Entry OF A Default For Spoilation,” and thus it is 

GRANTED by the Court.

The following enlarged response schedule is set: 

Defendants’ reply to Plaintiff’s above-identified motion in limine, 

 shall come due Noon Monday, February 25, 2008 or .

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February ___ , 2008 U.S. District Judge 

Presented by: 

LAUSON & SCHEWE LLP 

 /RJL/ 

Robert J. Lauson, Esq. 

1

and defendants are DIRECTED to

provide a chambers copy of said reply no later than 4:00 p.m. on February 25, 2008.

21

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 236 Filed 02/21/08 Page 2 of 2