Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04831/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04831-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TATCHA, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

LANDMARK TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-04831-WHO 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. No. 14

Plaintiff Tatcha, LLC, filed this action for declaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement of two patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,289,319 (“the ’319 Patent”) and 7,010,508 (“the 

’508 Patent”). Dkt. No. 1. Defendant Landmark Technology LLC filed a motion to dismiss or, in 

the alternative, to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C § 1404(a) to the Southern District of California. 

Dkt. No. 14. Plaintiff then filed an Amended Complaint, dropping its claims related to the ’508 

Patent. Dkt. No. 15. Defendant acknowledges that its motion to dismiss focused mostly on the 

’508 Patent claims and is now moot. Dkt. No. 16. However, plaintiff has not filed a response to 

the motion to transfer venue, which was due November 4, 2016.

Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why its response has not been filed. Plaintiff 

shall respond to this Order by filing an opposition or non-opposition to the motion to transfer 

venue on or before November 23, 2016. Defendant’s reply (if any) must be filed on or before 

December 2, 2016. The December 7, 2016 hearing on this matter is rescheduled for January 4, 

2017, at 2:00 p.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2016

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-04831-WHO Document 18 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 1