Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SFI-537580v1 1 PARTIES’ STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

C-99-2506-SI

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (#060359)

ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com

Caroline N. Mitchell (#143124)

cnmitchell@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY

555 California Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 626-3939

Facsimile: (415) 875-5700

Attorneys for Defendants

Judith Brown Chomsky

jchomsky@igc.org

LAW OFFICES OF JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY

P.O. Box 29726

Elkins Park, PA 19027

Telephone: (215) 782-8367

Facsimile: (215) 782-8268

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY BOWOTO, et. al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

CHEVRON CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C-99-2506-SI

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND

HEARING DATE

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1004 Filed 02/14/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SFI-537580v1 2 PARTIES’ STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

C-99-2506-SI

WHEREAS, plaintiffs filed Judith Brown Chomsky's Rule 1006 Summary in Support of

Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which

Relief Can Be Granted, or, in the Alternative, Summary Judgment, and for a Determination of

the Applicable Law (filed January 27, 2006) ("Summary") on January 31, 2006;

WHEREAS defendants are moving to strike the Summary and submitting objections to

it on February 10, 2006; 

WHEREAS both parties agree Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Summary should be

heard at the same time as Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which

Relief Can Be Granted, or, in the Alternative, Summary Judgment, and for a Determination of

the Applicable Law, which is February 24, 2006 and

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT:

1. Defendants will submit their Motion to Strike and Objections to the Summary, and

any declarations or other documents filed in support of that motion, on February 10, 2006;

2. Defendants will served Judith Chomsky by e-mail with any of the documents

identified in Paragraph 1 that are not electronically filed, if any;

3. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motion to Strike will be filed on Friday, February 17,

2006;

4. Defendants will file their Reply in Support of the Motion to Strike on Tuesday,

February 21, 2006.

5. The Motion to Strike will be heard concurrently with Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief Can Be Granted, or, in the Alternative, Summary

Judgment, and for a Determination of the Applicable Law, on February 24, 2006.

6. To the extent that Defendants file evidence with their Reply in support of their Motion

to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief Can Be Granted, or, in the Alternative,

Summary Judgment, and for a Determination of the Applicable Law, which evidence Plaintiffs

contend should have been filed, if at all, with Defendants’ moving papers, Plaintiffs reserve the

right to seek a new hearing schedule that would allow Plaintiffs to file and brief a motion to strike

such evidence and raise objections to it, that could be heard at the same time as Defendants’

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1004 Filed 02/14/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SFI-537580v1 3 PARTIES’ STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

C-99-2506-SI

Motions to Dismiss and to Strike, and/or to seek an order continuing the hearing to allow

Plaintiffs to file a supplemental opposition to defendants’ newly submitted evidence.

DATED: February 10, 2006 JONES DAY

By: _______________ 

Caroline N. Mitchell

Attorneys for Defendants

DATED: February 10, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY

By: 

Judith Brown Chomsky

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February __, 2006

By: 

The Hon. Susan Illston

United States District Court Judge

13

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1004 Filed 02/14/06 Page 3 of 3