Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02548/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02548-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESUS SOLIS ARREOLA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

RODERICK HICKMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:05-cv-02548-JKS-GGH

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 17, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No objections to the

Findings and Recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304,

this Court has reviewed the record on its face and finds no clear error. At Docket No. 39 the

Court granted the motion of defendant B. Naku for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. In

opposing the motion of B. Naku, Plaintiff conceded that he had not exhausted his administrative

remedies and that he had purposely bypassed his administrative remedies and proceeded directly

to seek relief in the courts. Having reviewed the motion of defendant Donal Solomon, the Court

agrees with the Magistrate Judge that, on the merits, it appears from the unopposed motion that

the facts clearly establish that, as with B. Taku, Plaintiff has failed to show that he had exhausted

his administrative remedies.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 17, 2007, are adopted in full; 

Case 2:05-cv-02548-JKS-GGH Document 46 Filed 01/15/08 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

Arreola v. Director of Corrections, 2:06-cv-02548-JKS-GGH 2

2. The motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Donal Solomon at Docket No. 38 is

GRANTED;

3. The Complaint as against Defendant Donal Solomon is DISMISSED, without prejudice,

in its entirety; and 

4. The Court having previously entered orders at Docket Nos. 15 and 39 dismissing all

other named defendants, the Clerk of the Court to enter final judgment dismissing the Complaint

in its entirety against all defendants, without prejudice.

Dated: January 14, 2008

s/ James K. Singleton, Jr.

JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02548-JKS-GGH Document 46 Filed 01/15/08 Page 2 of 2