Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01399/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01399-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDALL W. HARDING, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:07-cv-01399 OWW-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 7)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On January 18, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed Findings and

Recommendations recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for lack

of jurisdiction. (Doc. 7). The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of

that order. On February 20, 2008, Petitioner filed a pleading entitled "Response to Dismiss Petition

for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction" (Doc. 8), which the Court construes as

objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the

Case 1:07-cv-01399-OWW -TAG Document 9 Filed 03/14/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 18, 2008 (Doc. 7), are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01399-OWW -TAG Document 9 Filed 03/14/08 Page 2 of 2