Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01420/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01420-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK FAHY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ORPHEOS TARBOX, et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-09-1420 MMC

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S APRIL

27, 2010 AND APRIL 29, 2010 FILINGS

By order filed February 18, 2010, the Court deferred ruling on plaintiff Frank Fahy’s

“Notice of Motion and Motion for Order Vacating Settlement With Defendant Alec Steiner,”

and stated therein that following the lifting of the stay imposed by the Court’s February 17,

2010 order, the Court, if necessary, would set a further briefing schedule and hearing on

said motion.

The stay of proceedings was lifted on April 15, 2010. Thereafter, plaintiff, without

leave of court, filed (1) on April 27, 2010, a document titled “Renewed Motion of the Plaintiff

for an Order Vacating Settlement with Defendant Alec Steiner,” and (2) on April 29, 2010, a

document titled “Notice of Renewal of Motion and Motion for Order Vacating Settlement

with Defendant Alec Steiner,” along with a “Declaration of Frank Fahy” in support thereof. 

By such filings, plaintiff seeks, in essence, to supplement with additional arguments his

previously filed motion to vacate the settlement.

Case 3:09-cv-01420-MMC Document 110 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court has not set a further briefing schedule on plaintiff’s motion. Accordingly,

plaintiff’s filings of April 27, 2010 and April 29, 2010 are hereby STRICKEN, and no

defendant need file a response thereto.

Any need for further briefing on plaintiff’s motion to vacate may be raised by the

parties at the Case Management Conference scheduled for May 28, 2010. In the interim,

no party shall file any further documents in support of or in opposition to such motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 4, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01420-MMC Document 110 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 2