Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00037/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00037-87/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE APPLE IPOD ITUNES ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION Case No.: 05-CV-0037 YGR

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INTERVENE

This Order Relates to: 

All Actions

Pending before the Court is a motion to intervene as plaintiffs with “newly discovered 

evidence” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) and (b). (Dkt. No. 1034.) In the Ninth 

Circuit, timeliness is a perquisite to intervention as of right or permissive intervention. United 

Latin Am. Citizens v. Wilson, 131 F.3d 1297, 1308 (9th Cir. 1997). The instant motion—filed more 

than a decade after the start of this case and more than a month after entry of final judgment—is, on 

its face, untimely in light of that procedural posture. The motion is therefore DENIED. 

This Order terminates Docket No. 1034. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: February 25, 2015 _______________________________________ 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:05-cv-00037-YGR Document 1035 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 1