Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02730/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02730-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Injunction

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

No. C 05-2730 WHA

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

STEVEN J. SALTIEL (CSBN 202292)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6996

FAX: (415) 436-6748

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN and KURT F.

JOHNSON, d/b/a THE DOREAN GROUP,

THE OXFORD TRUST and UNIVERSAL

TRUST,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 05-2730 WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING

PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTS TO

MODIFY INJUNCTION FOR

BORROWERS TO SEEK RETURN OF

PROPERTY INTERESTS CONVEYED

TO DEFENDANTS HEINEMAN &

JOHNSON

WHEREAS, the Court in the above-captioned action issued an Order Granting

Preliminary Injunction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1345, dated August 1, 2005 (“Preliminary

Injunction”), enjoining defendants Heineman, Johnson, the Dorean Group, its brokers, agents and

employees from, inter alia, any further engagement in a debt elimination program; 

WHEREAS, a number of borrowers, or counsel representing borrowers, have inquired

with the U.S. Attorney’s Office about a modification of the Preliminary Injunction to allow them

to cure defects in title to their properties caused by defendants’ debt elimination scheme; 

WHEREAS, such a modification is sought for the limited purpose of returning the

property interests the borrowers conveyed, respectively, to Heineman and Johnson, as purported

Case 3:05-cv-02730-WHA Document 42 Filed 06/21/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

No. C 05-2730 WHA 2

trustees of so-claimed “family trusts” under this debt elimination program; 

WHEREAS, the government is agreeable to a case-by-case review of applications for

modifications of the Preliminary Injunction, given the spectrum of culpability amongst borrowers

in this case. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

(1) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Magistrate Judge __________________ is hereby

designated to hear and determine requests by borrowers to modify, for the limited purpose set

forth above, the Preliminary Injunction to allow such borrowers the opportunity to cure defects in

title to their properties caused by defendants’ debt elimination scheme. 

(2) Borrowers seeking to so modify the Injunction, and any interested parties, shall follow

the following procedure:

(A) The borrower shall file a “Request to Modify the Preliminary Injunction for [Property

Address]” (the “Request”). This Request shall briefly state, in no more than 5 pages, the reasons

for the sought modification, and shall describe the proposed transaction with sufficient

particularity as to allow a determination on the Request. A copy of this Request shall be served

by mail to: (1) Dale S. Heineman, 12152-081, FCI Dublin Correctional Facility, 5701 8 Street, th

Camp Parks, Dublin, California 94568; (2) Kurt F. Johnson, 13177-081, FCI Dublin Correctional

Facility, 5701 8 Street, Camp Parks, Dublin, California 94568; (3) lenders with secured interests th

in the real property identified as the Property Address (above); (4) counsel for the government in

the related criminal case (No. CR 05-0611 WHA), Peter B. Axelrod and James E. Keller, United

States Attorney’s Office, Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 11 Floor, th

San Francisco, California 94102; and (5) counsel for the government in this civil action, Steven

J. Saltiel, Civil Division, United States Attorney’s Office, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055,

San Francisco, California 94102. 

(B) The recipients identified in Paragraph 2(A) above will have 45 days from the time of

the mailing of the Request to file a Response opposing, unopposing, or taking no position as to

the Request. Responses to a Request must state the grounds for oppositions thereto, if any, and

may not exceed 5 pages in length. The magistrate may, in his or her discretion, base the

Maria-Elena James

Case 3:05-cv-02730-WHA Document 42 Filed 06/21/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

No. C 05-2730 WHA 3

proposed determination solely on the written submissions of the interested parties, or on the

submissions and a hearing. The parties that object to a Request shall be afforded an opportunity

to attend any hearing held pursuant to this Order. 

(C) The magistrate shall file his or her proposed findings and recommendations with the

Court, and a copy shall be mailed to all interested parties. The magistrate’s determination shall

be subject to de novo review as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, within ten days

of being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to the proposed

findings and recommendations. This Court may then accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in

part, the findings and recommendations made by the magistrate. 

DATED:

________________________________

HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6/21/06

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:05-cv-02730-WHA Document 42 Filed 06/21/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

No. C 05-2730 WHA 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that she is an employee of the Office of the United

States Attorney for the Northern District of California and is a person of such age and discretion

to be competent to serve papers. The undersigned further certifies that she is causing a copy of

the following:

[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTS TO MODIFY

INJUNCTION FOR BORROWERS TO SEEK RETURN OF PROPERTY INTERESTS

CONVEYED TO DEFENDANTS HEINEMAN & JOHNSON

to be served this date upon the party(ies) indicated below at the address(es) shown:

Dale Scott Heineman, Pro se

12152-081

FCI Dublin Correctional Facility

5701 8 Street th

Camp Parks

Dublin, CA 94568

Kurt F. Johnson, Pro se

13177-081

FCI Dublin Correctional Facility

5701 8 Street th

Camp Parks

Dublin, CA 94568

 / BY FIRST CLASS MAIL by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope

with postage thereon fully prepaid in the designated area for outgoing U.S. mail in

accordance with this office's practice.

 BY PERSONAL SERVICE (BY MESSENGER): I caused such envelope to be

delivered by hand to the person or offices of each addressee above.

 BY FACSIMILE (FAX): I caused each such document to be sent by facsimile to 

 the person or offices of each addressee above. 

______ BY E-MAIL: I caused each such document to be sent by e-mail to the person or

offices of each address above.

 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 6 day of June, 2006 at San Francisco, California.

th 

 /s/ 

KATHY TERRY

Legal Assistant

 

Case 3:05-cv-02730-WHA Document 42 Filed 06/21/06 Page 4 of 4