Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01086/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01086-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM E. BROWN, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-1086 FCD KJM P

vs.

T. FELKER, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

On July 2, 2007, petitioner filed a request for an extension of time in which to file

a response to the reply to petitioner’s opposition to respondent’s motion to dismiss. 

When a party has raised new arguments or presented new evidence in a reply to

an opposition, the court may permit the other party to counter the new arguments or evidence. 

El Pollo Loco v. Hashim, 316 F.3d 1032, 1040-41 (9th Cir. 2003). In this case, respondent has

raised nothing new, but has simply argued that petitioner’s opposition does not defeat the motion

to dismiss. Plaintiff is not entitled to file a further response.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s July 2, 2007 request for an extension

of time is denied. 

DATED: August 30, 2007. 

brow1086.neot

Case 2:06-cv-01086-MCE-KJN Document 32 Filed 08/30/07 Page 1 of 1