Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07171/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07171-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIP/ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 

Smith v. City of Oakland, Case No. C06-07171 MJJ 

JOHN L. BURRIS (SBN# 69888) 

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 

Airport Corporate Centre 

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 

Oakland, California 94621 

Telephone: (510) 839-5200 

Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 

Email: john.burris@johnburrislaw.com 

JAMES B. CHANIN (SBN# 76043) 

Law Offices of James B. Chanin 

3050 Shattuck Avenue 

Berkeley, California 94705 

Telephone: (510) 848-4752 

Facsimile: (510) 848-5819 

Email: jbcofc@aol.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JANE SMITH NO. 1, et al., ) CASE NO. C06-07171 MJJ 

 ) 

 ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

 ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 

 ) LEAVE TO FILE SECOND 

 ) AMENDED COMPLAINT 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) 

 ) 

CITY OF OAKLAND; et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

 THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF 

RECORD, DO HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT plaintiffs shall be 

given leave to file the Second Amended Complaint which is 

attached and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 1. The 

Case 3:06-cv-07171-MMC Document 28 Filed 11/08/07 Page 1 of 2
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIP/ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 

Smith v. City of Oakland, Case No. C06-07171 MJJ 

purpose of this Amendment is to join nine additional plaintiffs 

in the within action, for a current total of 16 named plaintiffs. 

 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: October 12, 2007 ___________/S/________________ 

 INES VARGAS FRAENKEL 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 CITY OF OAKLAND 

Dated: September 18, 2007 ___________/S/________________ 

 GEOFFREY A. BEATY 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 RICHARD VALERGA 

Dated: September 10, 2007 ____________/S/_______________ 

 JOHN L. BURRIS 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: September 10, 2007 ___________/S/________________ 

 JAMES B. CHANIN 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: ____________, 2007 ___________________________ 

 MARTIN J. JENKINS 

 Judge of the United States 

 District Court 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

11/06

Case 3:06-cv-07171-MMC Document 28 Filed 11/08/07 Page 2 of 2