Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01846/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01846-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:1383 Review of HHS Decision

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARRIE E. KRIDER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO: 1:08-cv-01846 LJO JLT

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLAINTIFF’S

APPEAL FROM ADMINISTRATIVE

DECISION (Doc. 21)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT AND

AGAINST PLAINTIFF

Plaintiff Carrie E. Krider (“Plaintiff”) seeks this Court’s review of an administrative law

judge’s (“ALJ’s”) decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability insurance benefits under Title

II of the Social Security Act (‘the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §401 et seq. (Doc. 2). After review of the

administrative record and the parties’ papers, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and

recommendations on January 19, 2010 to DENY Plaintiff’s request to reverse the ALJ’s decision

denying Plaintiff benefits. (Doc. 21). On February 3, 2010, Plaintiff filed timely objections to

the findings and recommendations. (Doc. 22). The undersigned has considered the objections

and has determined that there is no need to modify the findings and recommendations based on

the points raised in the objections. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the

case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the magistrate judge’s findings

and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1

Case 1:08-cv-01846-LJO-JLT Document 25 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 22) are OVERRULED;

2. The findings and recommendations filed January 19, 2010 (Doc. 21), are ADOPTED

IN FULL;

3. The Plaintiff’s Social Security complaint (Doc. 2) is DENIED; and

4.The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Michael J. 

Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, and against Plaintiff Carrie E. Krider.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 17, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-01846-LJO-JLT Document 25 Filed 02/18/10 Page 2 of 2