Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00553/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00553-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANSOUR AHMED SOUSSI, CASE NO. CV-F-06-553-LJO-SMS

Plaintiff, ORDER LIFTING STAY; ORDER DISMISSING

CASE; ORDER TO CLOSE CASE 

vs.

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of 

Homeland Security, EDUARDO 

AGUIRRE, Director of the United States

Citizenship and Immigration Services, 

DAVID STILL, District Director of the 

United States Citizenship and 

Immigration Services, DON RIDING,

Officer in Charge of the Fresno Office 

of the United States Citizenship and 

Immigration Services, McGREGOR

SCOTT,

Defendants.

 /

On May 9, 2006, Plaintiff Mansour Ahmed Soussi filed his complaint in the above-titled action

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1447(b), claiming that the Defendants failed to adjudicate his Application for

Naturalization within 120 days of the initial examination. After discovery, Defendants filed a Motion

to Remand and a Motion to Stay on February 13, 2007. Defendants sought a remand, because they were

in a position to adjudicate Soussi’s application for naturalization. On April 10, 2007, this Court granted

Defendants’ motion to stay and remand, with instructionsto adjudicate the application within 120 days.

(Doc. 40) 

Case 1:06-cv-00553-LJO -SMS Document 42 Filed 08/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The time period for remand has elapsed. On August 15, 2007, Defendants filed a Notice of

Adjudication, which indicated that Soussi’s application was adjudicated on August 8, 2007. (Doc. 41).

This notice was accompanied by an Exhibit, which was the letter showing that the adjudication occurred.

Because the application has been adjudicated, the complaint is now moot. Therefore, this Court orders:

I. The Stay is LIFTED;

II. The case is DISMISSED as moot; and

III. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 16, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00553-LJO -SMS Document 42 Filed 08/16/07 Page 2 of 2