Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-03149/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-03149-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ISABEL BEL MONTEZ, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal 

corporation, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:10-cv-3149-MCE-EFB 

ORDER 

 This case was before the court on February 10, 2016, for hearing on defendants’ motions 

to compel plaintiffs Isabel Bel Montez, minor I.G., and minor J.G. to provide responses to 

defendants’ Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. ECF Nos. 25, 26, 27. 

Attorney James Cook appeared on behalf of plaintiffs; Deputy City Attorney Ted Wood appeared 

on behalf of defendants. 

 For the reasons stated on the record, defendants’ motions to compel (ECF Nos. 25, 26, 27) 

are granted. Plaintiffs Isabel Bel Montez, minor I.G., and minor J.G. shall provide responses to 

defendants’ Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents by March 1, 2016. Should 

plaintiffs require additional time to provide responses, the parties may submit a stipulation 

requesting the court to extend the deadline for compliance with this order. However, any such 

///// 

Case 2:10-cv-03149-MCE-EFB Document 31 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

stipulation to modify the court’s scheduling order must be presented to the assigned district judge 

and shall be supported by a showing of good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). 

DATED: February 16, 2016. 

Case 2:10-cv-03149-MCE-EFB Document 31 Filed 02/16/16 Page 2 of 2