Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00483/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00483-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On December 16, 2016, the parties parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action. (Doc. 13) 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a 

court order by filing: “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing. . . a 

stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.”. . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once 

such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 

Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice of 

dismissal without prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 19, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CRYSTAL DESAUTELS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KMART,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-CV-0483- JLT

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE 

THIS CASE

(Doc. 13)

 

Case 1:16-cv-00483-JLT Document 14 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 1