Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05387/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05387-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

RONALD S. KATZ (California Bar No. 085713) 

CHRISTOPHER L. WANGER (California Bar No. 164751) 

RYAN S. HILBERT (California Bar No. 210549) 

1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 

Telephone: (650) 812-1300 

Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 

PERRY J. NARANCIC (California Bar No. 206820) 

VERITY, INC. 

894 ROSS DRIVE,

SUNNYVALE, CA 94089

Telephone: (408) 541-1500 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

VERITY, INC. 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 

SEAN A. LINCOLN (California Bar No. 136387) 

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (California Bar No. 173985) 

THOMAS J. GRAY (California Bar No. 191411) 

DANIEL J. WEINBERG (California Bar No. 227159) 

1000 Marsh Road,

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 614-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 

DAVID TAUBER (California Bar No. 78385) 

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC. 

500 MACARA AVENUE 

SUNNYVALE, CA 94085 

Telephone: (408) 738-6200 

Facsimile: (408) 738-6203 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

VERITY, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. C-04-5387 CRB 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 1 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

VERITY, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. C 05-01660 CRB 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Prior to the consolidation of these two cases (Case No. C-04-5387 CRB and Case 

No. Case No. C 05-01660 CRB), the Court entered separate Stipulated Protective Orders in each 

case. Those Protective Orders provide in section 7.1 that a receiving party may only use 

Protected Material disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with 

the case in which the Protected Material was disclosed or produced. However, the parties believe 

that certain Protected Materials disclosed or produced in each of these cases are relevant to issues 

in the other case with which it was consolidated. Accordingly, the parties seek entry of a 

Protective Order in both consolidated cases that allows a party receiving Protected Material in 

either of the consolidated cases to use such material in both the case in which it was produced and 

in the consolidated case as set forth further below. 

Disclosure and discovery activity in these consolidated actions is likely to involve 

production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from 

public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be 

warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the 

following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer 

blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords 

extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal 

principles to treatment as confidential. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 

10, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order creates no entitlement to file confidential 

information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 2 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

reflects the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file 

material under seal. 

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 

employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff).

2.2 The Consolidated Cases or This Litigation: Case No. C04-05387 and Case 

No. C05-01660, which have been consolidated by the Court and are collectively referred to as 

“this litigation.” 

2. 3 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 

the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 

testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or 

responses to discovery in either of the Consolidated Cases. 

2. 4 “Confidential” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that contain trade secrets or other confidential 

research, development, commercial or business information. 

2. 5 “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or Items:

extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” whose disclosure to another Party or 

non-party would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less 

restrictive means. 

2. 6 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 

from a Producing Party. 

2.7 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or 

Discovery Material in either of the Consolidated Cases. 

2.8 Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or 

items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 3 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

2.9 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated 

as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

2.10 Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are 

retained to represent or advise a Party in either of the Consolidated Cases.

2.11 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. 

2.12 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well 

as their support staffs). 

2.13 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 

pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert 

witness or as a consultant in either of the Consolidated Cases and who is not a current employee 

of a Party or of a competitor of a Party’s and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to 

become an employee of a Party or a competitor of a Party’s. This definition includes a 

professional jury or trial consultant retained in connection with either of the Consolidated Cases. 

2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 

services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; 

organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and 

subcontractors.

3. SCOPE 

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected 

Material (as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all 

copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or 

presentations by parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected 

Material.

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 4 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

4. DURATION

Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed 

by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a 

court order otherwise directs. 

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.

Each Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must 

take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate 

standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of 

material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions 

of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are 

not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that 

are shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose unnecessary 

expenses and burdens on other parties), expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 

If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items that it 

designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of 

protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is 

withdrawing the mistaken designation 

5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this 

Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 

material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 

material is disclosed or produced. 

Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 

(a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions or 

other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 5 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” on each page that contains 

protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 

the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 

appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection 

being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY”). 

A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for 

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated 

which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the 

designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the 

documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, 

or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified 

documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) on each page that contains 

Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 

the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 

appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection 

being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY”).

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that 

the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, before the 

close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further specify 

any portions of the testimony that qualify as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY.” When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is 

entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify 

for protection, the Party or non-party that sponsors, offers, or gives the testimony may invoke on 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 6 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

the record (before the deposition or proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to twenty (20) 

days after the receipt of the written transcript to identify the specific portions of the testimony as 

to which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted 

(“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). Only 

those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the twenty 

(20) days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order.

Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by the 

court reporter, who must affix on each such page the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as instructed by the Party or non-party 

offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony. 

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for any 

other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the 

container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” 

or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only portions of the 

information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall 

identify the protected portions, specifying whether they qualify as “Confidential” or as “Highly 

Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

5.3 Computer Source Code and Similar Electronic Media.

(a) As used herein, “Computer Source Code” shall mean statements for the 

programming of computers written in a high-level or assembly language that are readable by 

humans but are not directly readable by a computer. Any person may specially designate as 

“CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY — RESTRICTED ELECTRONIC MEDIA” 

any Computer Source Code or other similar extremely sensitive technical materials (whether in 

electronic or hardcopy form) that it produces in the course of discovery in either of the 

Consolidated Cases when such person has a good faith belief that such material qualifies for such 

protection under this Order and that access to such materials would allow replication of an 

otherwise confidential computer program. The designation of material as “CONFIDENTIAL: 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 7 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

8 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY — RESTRICTED ELECTRONIC MEDIA” shall have no effect 

on any person’s claim of ownership concerning that material. Except as otherwise provided 

herein, “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY — RESTRICTED ELECTRONIC 

MEDIA” shall be subject to all of the same restrictions as materials designated 

“CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” with the following additional restrictions: 

 (i) If a person is requested to produce electronic copies of material 

properly designated as “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY — RESTRICTED 

ELECTRONIC MEDIA,” any such production shall be made on CD. The disclosing person shall 

provide to the receiving party at least two (2) identical CD’s containing the requested materials. 

 (ii) The receiving party shall not make copies in any medium of any 

“CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY — RESTRICTED ELECTRONIC MEDIA” 

except as follows: 

 (1) At any given time, the receiving party may copy each 

produced copy of “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY — RESTRICTED 

ELECTRONIC MEDIA” only into the RAM of a single computer. Without limiting the 

generality of the foregoing, a particular copy of “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY — RESTRICTED ELECTRONIC MEDIA” may not be copied into the RAM of one 

computer and then, while leaving that copy on the first computer, subsequently copied into the 

RAM of another computer without prior written approval from counsel for the disclosing person. 

 (2) Any computer into whose RAM material properly 

designated as “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY — RESTRICTED 

ELECTRONIC MEDIA” is copied must be disconnected from any and all networks before the 

material is copied onto the computer and for the duration of the time the material remains on the 

computer. Only after all such material is removed from RAM and that computer has been shut 

down may any network connection be made or restored. 

 (3) Any computer into whose RAM material properly 

designated as “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY — RESTRICTED 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 8 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

ELECTRONIC MEDIA” is copied must remain in the direct control only of those persons 

specified in Paragraph 2(c) of this Order as properly having access to “CONFIDENTIAL: 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” material. 

 (4) Except for transitory copies created in the RAM or other 

internal operating circuitry of a computer, excerpts of material properly designated as 

“CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY — RESTRICTED ELECTRONIC MEDIA” 

shall be copied onto paper or electronic media only for the purpose of creating submissions to the 

Court for presentation to the Court at hearings or at trial, and, once having been made, all such 

excerpts of such material shall be designated “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 

in the name of the disclosing person. 

 (iii) To the extent that the provisions of Section 5.3 may conflict with 

any other provision of this Order, the provisions of this Paragraph shall control. 

5.4 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. Notwithstanding Section 5.2 above, if 

timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items as 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive 

the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. If material 

is appropriately designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” 

after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the 

designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with 

the provisions of this Order.

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

6.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s 

confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary 

economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not 

waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge 

promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 9 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

6.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a 

Designating Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the 

process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not 

sufficient) with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party must 

explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give 

the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the 

circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen 

designation. A challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it 

has engaged in this meet and confer process first and only after the Designating Party has been 

given 10 calendar days to respond to the challenging Party’s objection.. 

6.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a 

confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party 

may file and serve a motion under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 

79-5, if applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the 

challenge. Absent good cause for extending the following deadlines, a challenging Party’s 

motion must be filed within 14 days of the Designating Party’s response to the challenge or, if no 

response, the expiration of the 10 days given to the Designating Party to Respond. Each such 

motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the movant has 

complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph, and that 

sets forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the 

Designating Party in the meet and confer dialogue. The burden of persuasion in any such 

challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all 

parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is 

entitled under the Producing Party’s designation.

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 

disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with either of the 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 10 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

Consolidated Cases only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle either or both of the 

Consolidated Cases. Any Protected Material previously produced under the Stipulated Protective 

Order in Case No. C04-05387 may be used in Case No. C05-01660; similarly, any Protected 

Material previously produced under the Stipulated Protective Order in Case No. C05-01660 may 

be used in Case No. C04-5387. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories 

of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When both of the Consolidated 

Cases have been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 11, 

below (FINAL DISPOSITION). 

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 

location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under 

this Order. 

7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise 

ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may 

disclose any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to: 

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in these Consolidated Cases, 

as well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the 

information for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective 

Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the 

Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have 

signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

(d) the Court and its personnel;

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 11 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

(e) court reporters, their staffs, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” 

(Exhibit A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal 

Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to 

anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and 

(g) the author of the document or the original source of the information. 

7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by 

the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in these Consolidated Cases, 

as well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the 

information for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective 

Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

(b) One House Counsel of a Receiving Party (1) who has no involvement in 

competitive decision making or in patent prosecutions involving the technologies used in the 

Parties’ products, including, but not limited to search, retrieval, classification and analysis of text 

and data, (2) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, and (3) who has 

signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably 

necessary for this litigation, and (2) who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective 

Order” (Exhibit A); 

(d) the Court and its personnel;

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 12 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

(e) court reporters, their staffs, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and 

(f) the author of the document or the original source of the information. 

7.4 Retention of Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order (Exhibit A). 

Counsel for the party retaining the expert or consultant (“Retaining Party”) shall maintain the 

original executed Exhibit A in his or its files until the conclusion of this Action and any appeals 

therefrom at which time the Retaining Party, upon receipt of a written demand from the 

Designating Party, shall provide a copy of the executed Exhibit A to the Designating Party. 

7.5 Use of Confidential Material in Depositions. Whenever 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” material 

is to be discussed or disclosed in a deposition in either of these Consolidated Cases: (a) any 

person who has produced or will produce such material may require the exclusion from the room 

of any person who is not entitled to receive such material under this Order; and (b) any party who 

will disclose material previously designated pursuant to Section 5, above, shall first exclude from 

the room any person who is not entitled to receive such material under this Order. 

7.6 Any person who has previously executed an “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” in either Case No. C04-05387 or Case No. C05-01660 shall be deemed bound 

by such Agreement in both Case No. C04-05387 and Case No. C05-01660 and need not execute 

the Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit A) attached hereto. 

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN 

OTHER LITIGATION.

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation 

that would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in these Consolidated Cases 

as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the 

Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) immediately 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 13 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

14 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

and in no event more than three (3) court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such 

notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order.

The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who 

caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered 

by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party 

must deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the Party in the other action 

that caused the subpoena or order to issue.

The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the 

existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in these Consolidated Cases 

an opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena 

or order issued. The Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking 

protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions should be 

construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful 

directive from another court.

9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 

Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated 

Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating 

Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected 

Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the 

terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and 

Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

10. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL.

Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order secured 

after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this 

action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must 

comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 14 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

15 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

11. FINAL DISPOSITION.

Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within sixty 

(60) days after the final termination of both of these Consolidated Cases, each Receiving Party 

must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all 

Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of 

reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. With permission in writing from the 

Designating Party, the Receiving Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead 

of returning it. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must 

submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the 

Designating Party) by the sixty (60) day deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) 

all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party 

has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or 

capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to 

retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, 

correspondence or attorney work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any 

such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective 

Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION) above. 

12. MISCELLANEOUS

12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 

person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 

12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 

Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or 

producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective 

Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of 

the material covered by this Protective Order. 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 15 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: August 2, 2005 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

By: /s/ Christopher L. Wanger 

Christopher L. Wanger 

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

VERITY, INC. 

Dated: August 2, 2005 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

By: /s/ Thomas J. Gray 

Thomas J. Gray 

Attorneys for Defendant,

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC. 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Christopher

L. Wanger hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________, 2005 ___________________________ 

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Judge

August 05 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 16 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB AND CASE NO. C05-01660 CRB

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

EXHIBIT A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 

I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of _________________ 

[print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and 

understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for 

the Northern District of California on ____________ [date] in the consolidated cases of Verity,

Inc. v. Inxight Software, Inc. (U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. Case No. C04-05387 CRB) and Inxight

Software, Inc. v. Verity, Inc. (U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. Case No. C05-01660 CRB). I agree to comply 

with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and 

acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature 

of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item 

that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict 

compliance with the provisions of this Order. 

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective 

Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. 

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 

_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone 

number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any 

proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

Date: _________________________________ 

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ 

Printed name: ______________________________ 

[printed name] 

Signature: __________________________________

 [signature] 

20139799.1

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 44 Filed 08/08/05 Page 17 of 17