Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01553/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01553-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert G. Lawrence,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Motorola Inc., et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CV 04-1553 PHX NVW

ORDER

Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion to File His Motion for Review de novo . . .

Under Seal. (Doc. # 29.) The stipulated protective order was entered July 18, 2005. 

(Doc. # 24.) The motion requests leave to file Plaintiff's motion in its entirety under seal,

not just the portions actually deserving of confidentiality. The sealing of filed documents

is burdensome on the clerk's office and therefore will not be ordered without specific

justification. The mere fact that a party has designated documents as confidential in the

discovery process does not mean that the documents are confidential in fact and warrant

sealing in the court record. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to File His Motion for

Review de novo . . . Under Seal (doc. # 29) is denied with leave to submit a further 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-01553-NVW Document 34 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

motion that requests sealing only of the portions of the motion and exhibits and

substantively warrant sealing. Counsel are directed to confer about the need for sealing.

DATED this 25th day of October, 2005.

Case 2:04-cv-01553-NVW Document 34 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 2