Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01510/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01510-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

App. for Late Filing Page 1 of 2

Laurence F. Padway, #89314

Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway

1516 Oak Street, Suite 109

Alameda, California 94501

Telephone: (510)814-0680

Facsimile : (510)814-0650

Attorneys for plaintiff

Royal Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROYAL YATES No. 05-01510 BZ

Plaintiff,

vs.

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO 

GUNNALLEN FINANCIAL and FILE BRIEF LATE AND

CURT WILLIAMS [Proposed] ORDER

Defendants.

____________________________/

I, Laurence F. Padway, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that:

1. I am the attorney for plaintiff Royal Yates.

2. Under the scheduling order dated December 6, plaintiff was to file his opposition

to defendants’ Rule 50(b) motion on or before December 22.

3. My calendar inadvertently showed December 22 as a reminder date for this

opposition instead of the due date. I did not recognize this error until December 23, while I was

working on the opposition.

4. As a result of this calendar error, plaintiff;s opposition was filed on December 25.

Case 3:05-cv-01510-BZ Document 176 Filed 12/25/2006 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-01510-BZ Document 177 Filed 12/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

App. for Late Filing Page 2 of 2

5. In view of the holiday weekend, I am aware of no prejudice to any party from the

late filing, and I doubt that any would occur.

6. For the foregoing reason, plaintiff requests permission to file his opposition late,

i.e., on December 25.

Executed this 25 day of December, 2006, at Alameda, California. th

______________________

Laurence F. Padway

ORDER

Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that plaintiff may file his opposition to

defendants’ motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) on December 25, 2006.

Dated: December 26, 2006

_______________________

Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01510-BZ Document 176 Filed 12/25/2006 Page 2 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 3:05-cv-01510-BZ Document 177 Filed 12/26/06 Page 2 of 2