Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171-52/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

OKI AMERICA, INC., ET AL., 

 PLAINTIFF, 

VS. 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 DEFENDANT. 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS

UNDER SEAL 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 COUNTERCLAIMANT, 

VS. 

OKI AMERICA, INC., OKI ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRY CO., LTD., OKI DATA 

CORPORATION AND OKI DATA AMERICAS,

INC., 

 COUNTER-DEFENDANTS. 

WHEREAS, counsel for Oki and AMD have designated the documents and exhibits 

listed in Attachment A as Outside Counsel Only under the Protective Order entered by this 

Court on December 8, 2004; and 

WHEREAS, due to citation or paraphrasing of the content of these documents, 

portions of the following motions have been designated by Oki and AMD as Outside 

Counsel Only under the Protective Order entered by this Court on December 8, 2004: 

(1) AMD’s Reply to Oki’s Opposition to AMD’s Motion to Exclude Portions of 

the Expert Reports of Dr. Stephen Fonash which contains Oki’s confidential process 

information. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 528 Filed 10/20/06 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(2) AMD’s Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Exclude the Testimony of 

Richard B. Troxel with Respect to AMD’s Damages Claim, which contains AMD’s and 

Oki’s confidential information pertaining to products, processes and sales. 

(3) AMD’s Reply to Oki’s Opposition to AMD’s Partial Motion for Summary 

Judgment of Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,495,855 which contains 

AMD and Intel’s confidential process information. 

(4) AMD’s Reply in Support of Its Partial Motion for Summary Judgment of 

Non-Infringement of the Kurachi Patents by its K8 Microprocessors and Motion to Deny 

Injunctive Relief Against its Obsolete Fab 25 K7 Microprocessors which contains 

confidential information pertaining to AMD’s products and processes. 

(5) AMD’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of 

Literal Infringement of the Patel Patent which contains Oki’s confidential process 

information. 

WHEREAS, AMD now seeks to file with the Court the documents listed in 

Attachment A which have been designated by Oki and AMD as Outside Counsel Only 

under the Protective Order entered by this Court on December 8, 2004. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between all parties that the 

documents listed in Attachment A and the above-referenced motions should be filed under 

seal because they contain confidential information protected under the Court’s Protective 

Order entered December 8, 2004. 

 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 528 Filed 10/20/06 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: October 19, 2006 VINSON & ELKINS, LLP 

/s/ Christopher V. Ryan

 Christopher V. Ryan 

Attorneys for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD & 

EVANS, PLLC 

/s/ Patrick Curran

 Patrick Curran 

Attorneys for Oki America, et al. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:__________________________ _______________________________________ 

 Charles R. Breyer 

 United States District Judge 

October 19, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 528 Filed 10/20/06 Page 3 of 3