Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01286/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01286-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 15-cv-1286-LB STATUS REPORT OF HOMEJOY PURSUANT 

TO COURT’S MAY 1, 2015 ORDER 

PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

M. KIRBY C. WILCOX (SB# 078576) 

kirbywilcox@paulhastings.com 

ZACHARY P. HUTTON (SB# 234737) 

zachhutton@paulhastings.com 

RYAN C. HESS (SB# 263079) 

ryanhess@paulhastings.com 

55 Second Street 

Twenty-Fourth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 

Telephone: 1(415) 856-7000 

Facsimile: 1(415) 856-7100 

PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

ESTHER Y. CHENG (SB# 280547) 

esthercheng@paulhastings.com 

875 15th Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20005 

Telephone: 1(202) 551-1700 

Facsimile: 1(202) 551-1705 

Filed on Behalf of Defendant 

Homejoy, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

J.C. IGLESIAS, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HOMEJOY, INC., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 15-CV-1286-EMC 

STATUS REPORT OF DEFENDANT 

HOMEJOY, INC. PURSUANT TO 

COURT’S MAY 1, 2015 ORDER 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen. 

Department: 5 

Complaint Filed: March 19, 2015 

Trial Date: None set 

Case 3:15-cv-01286-EMC Document 31 Filed 07/29/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 15-cv-1286-LB -1- STATUS REPORT OF HOMEJOY PURSUANT 

TO COURT’S MAY 1, 2015 ORDER 

On May 1, 2015, the Court entered an Order granting the parties’ Joint Stipulation Staying 

Proceeding Pending Private Mediation and Extending Time for Defendant Homejoy, Inc. to 

Respond to Complaint (“Order”). The Court ordered that “within 14 days after the mediation 

concludes, the parties will report back to the Court on the status of the case and whether the stay 

should be lifted. At that time, if the mediation was unsuccessful, the parties also will propose a 

deadline for Homejoy to respond, answer, or otherwise plead in response to plaintiff’s 

Complaint.” 

Pursuant to this Order, Homejoy, Inc. (“Homejoy”) now provides the following report: 

1. Homejoy has decided to terminate operations at the end of the month, on July 31, 

2015. 

2. On July 27, 2015, the Court granted Paul Hastings LLP’s request to withdraw as 

Homejoy’s counsel in this case. 

3. In connection with the termination of its operations, Homejoy expects to enter into 

an Assignment for Benefit of Creditors under California law (“ABC”) in the next two weeks. 

Homejoy has been informed that once it enters into the ABC, the assignee intends to appoint 

replacement counsel. 

4. In light of the foregoing, Homejoy respectfully requests that the current stay be 

extended another 21 days to allow the assignee to appoint replacement counsel, and that the Court 

set a deadline to answer, amend, or otherwise response to the Complaint at that time. 

DATED: July 27, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

By: /s/ Zachary P. Hutton 

ZACHARY P. HUTTON 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

____________________ 

Edward M. Chen 

U.S. District Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-01286-EMC Document 31 Filed 07/29/15 Page 2 of 2