Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-298/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE 

DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL THOMSON TO 

RESPOND TO DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF 

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to 

Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., 

et al., No. 11-cv-01656; 

Siegel v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-05502; 

Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., 

No. 11-cv-05513; 

Target Corp., et al. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, 

Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-05514; 

Interbond Corporation of America v. Hitachi, et 

al., No. 11-cv-06275; 

Office Depot, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 

11-cv-06276; 

CompuCom Systems, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al., 

No. 11-cv-06396; 

Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Hitachi, Ltd., et 

al., No. 11-cv-06397; 

P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, et 

al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 12-cv-02648; 

Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. Hitachi, Ltd., 

et al., No. 12-cv-02649; 

Tech Data Corporation, et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et 

al., No. 13-cv-00157; 

Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et

Master File No. M:07-5994-SC

MDL No. 1917 

Case No. 3:11-cv-05513-SC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING THE 

DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO 

COMPEL THOMSON TO RESPOND 

TO DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS’ 

FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR 

ADMISSION

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2911 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 5
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE 

DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL THOMSON TO 

RESPOND TO DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF 

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

al., No. 13-cv-01173; 

Sharp Electronics Corp. et al. v. Koninklijke 

Philips Electronics, N.V., et al., No. 13-cv02776; 

Siegel v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05261; 

Sears, Roebuck and Co., et al. v. Technicolor SA, 

No. 13-cv-05262; 

Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. v. Technicolor SA, et al., 

No. 13-cv-05264; 

Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. Technicolor 

SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05668; 

Target Corp., v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-

cv-05686; 

Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Technicolor 

SA,, et al., No. 13-cv-005723; 

Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v. Technicolor 

SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05724; 

P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, et 

al. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05725; 

Office Depot, Inc. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 

13-cv-05726; 

Interbond Corporation of America v. Technicolor 

SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05727. 

ViewSonic Corporation, v. Chunghwa Picture 

Tubes, Ltd., et al., 3:14cv-02510.

This Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending the Deadline to File Motion to Compel 

Thomson to Respond to Direct Action Plaintiffs’ First Set of Requests for Admission between 

certain Direct Action Plaintiffs (“DAPs”), on the one hand, and defendants Thomson S.A. 

(n/k/a Technicolor SA); Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. (n/k/a Technicolor USA, 

Inc.) (collectively, “Thomson”), on the other hand, is made with respect to the following facts 

and recitals: 

WHEREAS, on March 21, 2014, the Court entered a scheduling order setting the close of 

fact discovery for September 5, 2014. See Dkt. No. 2459; 

WHEREAS, the deadline to file any motion to compel after the discover cut-off is 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2911 Filed 10/10/14 Page 2 of 5
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE 

DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL THOMSON TO 

RESPOND TO DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF 

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

September 12, 2014 (L.R. 37-3); 

WHEREAS, on August 1, 2014, the DAPs served their First Set of Requests for 

Admission on Thomson; 

WHEREAS, on September 5, 2014, Thomson served its Responses to DAP’s First Set of 

Requests for Admission and stated objections on various grounds; 

WHEREAS, on September 10, 11, 12, and 19, 2014, counsel for the undersigned parties 

held telephonic meet and confers to discuss deficiencies in Thomson’s responses identified by 

DAPs and have a bona fide intent to continue doing so; 

WHEREAS, on September 12, 2014, the undersigned parties filed a stipulation extending 

DAPs’ deadline to file a motion to compel relating to DAPs’ First Set of Requests of Admission 

until September 22, 2014, see Dkt. No. 2840; 

WHEREAS, the undersigned parties desire to continue to meet and confer regarding 

Thomson’s responses to DAPs’ First Set of Requests for Admission; 

WHEREAS, the DAPs and Thomson have conferred by and through their counsel and, 

subject to the Court’s approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

1. Subject to the parties’ meet and confer discussion, the Plaintiffs provided 

Thomson with a revised list of documents. 

2. Subject to the parties’ meet and confer discussion, Thomson will review 

the revised list for inclusion on, and will consider executing, a declaration 

or stipulation related to their authenticity and business record status by 

September 26, 2014. 

3. The undersigned parties agree to extend the deadline for the Plaintiffs to 

file a motion to compel relating to the Plaintiffs First Set of Requests for 

Admission, to the extent one is deemed necessary by Plaintiffs, to October 

3, 2014. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2911 Filed 10/10/14 Page 3 of 5
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

- 4 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE 

DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL THOMSON TO 

RESPOND TO DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF 

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

Dated: _________________ _____________________________________ 

 Hon. Samuel Conti 

 United States District Court Judge 

DATED: September 22, 2014 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

By: /s/ Laura E. Nelson_______________ 

Roman M. Silberfeld 

David Martinez 

Laura E. Nelson 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy 

Purchasing LLC; Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.; 

Best Buy Stores, L.P.; BESTBUY.COM, LLC; Magnolia 

Hi-Fi, LLC

/s/ Philip J. Iovieno 

Philip J. Iovieno 

Anne M. Nardacci 

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

30 South Pearl Street, 11th Floor 

Albany, NY 12207 

Telephone: (518) 434-0600 

Facsimile: (518) 434-0665 

Email: piovieno@bsfllp.com 

Email: anardacci@bsfllp.com 

William A. Isaacson 

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800 

Washington, D.C. 20015 

Telephone: (202) 237-2727 

Facsimile: (202) 237-6131 

Email: wisaacson@bsfllp.com 

Stuart Singer 

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 

Telephone: (954) 356-0011 

Facsimile: (954) 356-0022 

Email: ssinger@bsfllp.com 

Liaison Counsel for Direct Action and Attorneys for 

Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc., Electrograph 

Technologies, Corp., Office Depot, Inc., Interbond 

Corporation of America, P.C. Richard & Son Long Island 

Corporation, MARTA Cooperative of America, Inc., ABC 

Appliance, Inc., Schultze Agency Services LLC on behalf 

of Tweeter Opco, LLC and Tweeter Newco, LLC

10/10/2014

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2911 Filed 10/10/14 Page 4 of 5
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

- 5 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE 

DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL THOMSON TO 

RESPOND TO DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF 

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

Liaison Counsel for Direct Action Plaintiffs 

_/s/ Kathy L. Osborn_____________________________ 

Kathy L. Osborn (pro hac vice) 

Ryan M. Hurley (pro hac vice) 

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP 

300 N. Meridian Street, Suite 2700 

Indianapolis, IN 46204 

Telephone: (317) 237-0300 

Facsimile: (317) 237-1000 

kathy.osborn@FaegreBD.com 

ryan.hurley@FaegreBD.com 

Jeffrey S. Roberts (pro hac vice) 

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP 

3200 Wells Fargo Center 

1700 Lincoln Street 

Denver, CO 80203 

Telephone: (303) 607-3500 

Facsimile: (303) 607-3600 

jeff.roberts@FaegreBD.com 

Stephen M. Judge (pro hac vice) 

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP 

202 S. Michigan Street, Suite 1400 

South Bend, IN 46601 

Telephone: +1 574-234-4149 

Facsimile: +1 574-239-1900 

steve.judge@FaegreBd.com 

Calvin L. Litsey (SBN 289659) 

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP 

1950 University Avenue, Suite 450 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2279 

Telephone: (650) 324-6700 

Facsimile: (650) 324-6701 

calvin.litsey@FaegreBD.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Thomson SA and Thomson 

Consumer Electronics, Inc.

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2911 Filed 10/10/14 Page 5 of 5