Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05566/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05566-48/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1001 E.R.I.S.A.

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMIN. APP. FOR AN ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER

SEAL (RE PLTF OPPOSITION TO MSJ)

1 CASE NO. C 06-05566 CRB/EDL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCHLICHTER, BOGARD & DENTON

JEROME J. SCHLICHTER (054513)

DANIEL V. CONLISK (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

HEATHER LEA (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

MARK G. BOYKO (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

100 South Fourth Street, Suite 900

St. Louis, MO 63102

Telephone: (314) 621-6115

Facsimile: (314) 621-7151

jschlichter@uselaws.com

dconlisk@uselaws.com

hlea@uselaws.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Class Representatives

FUTTERMAN & DUPREE LLP

JAMIE L. DUPREE (158105)

160 Sansome Street, 17th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 399-3840

Facsimile: (415) 399-3838

jdupree@dfdlaw.com

Local Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Class Representatives

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

BEVERLY KANAWI and SALVADOR 

AQUINO, as representatives of a class of 

similarly situated person, and on behalf of the 

Plan,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BECHTEL CORPORATION, THE BECHTEL 

TRUST AND THRIFT PLAN COMMITTEE, 

PEGGI KNOX, and FREMONT 

INVESTMENT ADVISORS,

Defendants.

Case No. C 06-05566 CRB (EDL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE 

APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO 

FILE UNDER SEAL 

[CIVIL LOCAL RULES 79-5 AND 7-11]

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-05566-CRB Document 525 Filed 10/06/08 Page 1 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMIN. APP. FOR AN ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER

SEAL (RE PLTF OPPOSITION TO MSJ)

2 CASE NO. C 06-05566 CRB/EDL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On October 3, 2008, Plaintiffs Beverly Kanawi and Salvador Aquino (collectively 

“Plaintiffs”) filed an application for an order pursuant to Civil L. R. 79-5 permitting them to file 

under seal: 

1. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Fremont Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. 

2. Exhibits 7-12, 15-40, 42-55, 57-69, 71-78, 80-104, and 106 to the Declaration of Heather 

Lea (“Lea Decl.”), filed herein on October 3, 2008, in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to 

Fremont Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Opposition to MSJ”). 

3. Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Declaration of Al Otto (“Otto Decl”), filed herein on October 3, 

2008, in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Fremont Defendants’ Motion for Summary 

Judgment (“Opposition to MSJ”). 

4. Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Declaration of Ross Miller (“Miller Decl”), filed herein on October 

3, 2008, in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Fremont Defendants’ Motion for Summary 

Judgment (“Opposition to MSJ”). 

5. Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Declaration of Paul Kampner (“Kampner Decl”), filed herein on 

October 3, 2008, in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Fremont Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment (“Opposition to MSJ”). 

6. Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Declaration of Steve Pomerantz (“Pomerantz Decl”), filed herein 

on October 3, 2008, in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Fremont Defendants’ Motion 

for Summary Judgment (“Opposition to MSJ”). 

7. Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Declaration of David Witz (“Otto Decl”), filed herein on October 

3, 2008, in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Fremont Defendants’ Motion for Summary 

Judgment (“Opposition to MSJ”). 

8. Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Declaration of Edward O’Neal (“O’Neal Decl”), filed herein on 

October 3, 2008, in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Fremont Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment (“Opposition to MSJ”). 

The parties previously stipulated to the entry of a protective order in this case, which the 

Court entered on May 29, 2007 (the “Protective Order”) (Docket #81). Defendants produced a 

number of documents which they designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

Case 3:06-cv-05566-CRB Document 525 Filed 10/06/08 Page 2 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMIN. APP. FOR AN ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER

SEAL (RE PLTF OPPOSITION TO MSJ)

3 CASE NO. C 06-05566 CRB/EDL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CONFIDENTIAL” under the Protective Order. Among the documents designated 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” were the above documents which Plaintiffs 

have cited and relied upon in the Opposition to MSJ..

The Court having considered Plaintiffs’ application and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application is GRANTED and the above listed 

documents shall be filed under seal pursuant to Civil L.R.79-5.

Dated: , 2008

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

United States District Judge

October 06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-05566-CRB Document 525 Filed 10/06/08 Page 3 of 4
1

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF AND MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS WRONGFULLY WITHHELD AND/OR 

REDACTED ON THE BASIS OF RELEVANCE AND/OR PRIVILEGE

CASE NO. C 06-05566 CRB/EDL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:06-cv-05566-CRB Document 525 Filed 10/06/08 Page 4 of 4