Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453-50/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARC OPPERMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PATH, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 

ORDER DENYING IN PART 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL

Re: ECF No. 676

Defendant Path, Inc. moved to file under seal Exhibits 16 and 17 to the Declaration of 

Kathleen Lu in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. ECF No. 676. 

The Court previously granted in part the motion to file under seal Exhibit 16 but deferred

ruling on Exhibit 17. ECF No. 693. The Court stated it would deny the motion as to Exhibit 17

should Redpoint Ventures not file a declaration in support of sealing by April 25, 2016. No 

declaration has been filed in support of sealing. The Court accordingly denies Path’s motion to 

file Exhibit 17 under seal. See Civil L.R. 79-5(e)(2) (“Within 4 days of the filing of the 

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a declaration as 

required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material is sealable.”). 

The Court will not consider Exhibit 17 unless Path files the document in the public record

within seven days from the date of this Order. The hearing date and briefing schedule on the 

underlying motion for class certification shall remain as originally set.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2016

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 697 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 1