Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00167/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00167-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[APPEARANCES LISTED ON SIGNATURE

PAGES]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LEXAR MEDIA, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE 

SCHEDULE; SUPPORTING 

DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE;

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 121 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 123 Filed 07/28/06 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The parties have met and conferred and agree that a short extension of time will be

needed to complete expert discovery. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate that, with the 

Court’s permission, the current schedule set forth in the July 14, Proposed Order, which has not

been entered by the Court, be modified as follows. 

Event July 14, 2006 

Proposed Order 

Proposed Date 

Burden of proof expert 

reports 

July 21, 2006 July 28, 2006 

Rebuttal expert reports August 18, 2006 September 13, 2006 

Complete expert 

discovery 

September 12, 2006 October 20, 2006 

The remaining dates in the May 24, 2006 Scheduling Order shall remain in effect. 

By his signature below, counsel for Toshiba attests under penalty of perjury that 

counsel for Lexar concurs in the filing of this Stipulation. 

 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE;

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 121 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 2 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 123 Filed 07/28/06 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: July 21, 2006 /s/ Steven Cherensky 

Matthew D. Powers (Bar No. 104795) 

matthew.powers@weil.com

Steven Cherensky (Bar No. 168275) 

steven.cherensky@weil.com

Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650) 

chris.cox@weil.com

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Silicon Valley Office 

201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Telephone: (650) 802-3000 

Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 

Anita E. Kadala 

anita.kadala@weil.com

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Houston Office 

700 Louisiana, Suite 1600 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 546-5000 

Facsimile: (713) 224-9511 

Attorneys for LEXAR MEDIA, INC.

Dated: July 21, 2006 /s/ Carl Schlier 

Robert F. McCauley (Bar No. 162056) 

robert.mccauley@finnegan.com

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

Stanford Research Park 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Arthur I. Neustadt 

aneustadt@oblon.com

Richard D. Kelly 

rkelly@oblon.com

Carl E. Schlier 

cschlier@oblon.com

OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & 

NEUSTADT, P.C. 

1940 Duke Street 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

Telephone: (703) 413-3000 

Facsimile: (703) 413-2220 

Attorneys for TOSHIBA CORPORATION 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE;

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 121 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 3 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 123 Filed 07/28/06 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF CARL E. SCHLIER 

I, Carl E. Schlier, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in the State of Virginia, am admitted pro hac 

vice for this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and 

am with the law firm of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, attorneys of record for 

Toshiba Corporation. The matters referred to in this declaration are based on my personal 

knowledge and if called as a witness I could, and would, testify competently to those matters. 

2. The factual representations made above in the above Stipulation are true. The 

parties have been actively engaged in discovery and, in particular, the parties have been actively 

preparing for and taking depositions in the United States and in Japan for several months. 

Recently, the parties have met and conferred and agreed that the schedule in this case should be 

extended, as requested above, to permit the orderly completion of fact and expert discovery and to 

prepare for mediation and any dispositive motion practice. 

3. There have not been any prior modifications to July 14, 2006 Proposed Order. 

The June 23, 2006 Scheduling Order modified the schedule set forth in the May 24, 2006 

Scheduling Order. The May 24, 2006 Scheduling Order modified the schedule set forth in the 

February 10, 2006 Scheduling Order. The May 24, 2006 Scheduling Order also modified the 

proposed scheduling order submitted by the parties on April 14, 2006, which was not entered by 

the Court. The February 10, 2006 Scheduling Order modified the schedule set forth in the June 8, 

2005 Scheduling Order. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on July 21, 2006 at 

Alexandria, Virginia. 

 

 /s/ Carl E. Schlier 

 Carl E. Schlier

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE;

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 121 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 4 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 123 Filed 07/28/06 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________ __________________________________________ 

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

United States District Court Judge 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE;

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 121 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 5 of 5

7/28/2006

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 123 Filed 07/28/06 Page 5 of 5