Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07622/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07622-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7622

MARCUS D. THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

L. ROSS, RN; E. JOHNSON, RN; D. SPIERS, DON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00989-TSE-MSN)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus D. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, 

RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7622 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Marcus D. Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Specifically, 

we conclude that Thomas has presented no evidence that 

Defendants fabricated the documents submitted in support of 

their motion for summary judgment and that the district court 

did not err in denying Thomas’ motions for appointment of 

counsel and to subpoena witnesses. Accordingly, we deny Thomas’ 

motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Thomas v. Ross, No. 1:13-cv00989-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-7622 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 2