Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02267/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02267-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

STIPULATION TO REMAND; 2:24-cv-02267-SCR 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney 

MATHEW W. PILE 

Associate General Counsel 

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 

JUSTIN L. MARTIN, Missouri State Bar No. 62255 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 

Office of the General Counsel 

Social Security Administration 

6401 Security Boulevard 

Baltimore, MD 21235-6401 

Telephone: (206) 615-3735 

Email: Justin.L.Martin@ssa.gov 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

KRYSTAL ANNE RANGEL, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MARTIN O’MALLEY, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

 CIVIL NO. 2:24-cv-02267-SCR

STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY 

REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE 

FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO 

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned 

attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that this action be remanded for further 

administrative action pursuant to the Social Security Act § 205(g), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 

§ 405(g), sentence four. On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the administrative law 

judge (ALJ) to reevaluate the medical opinions and prior administrative findings, offer Plaintiff 

an opportunity for a hearing, and issue a new decision. The parties further request that the Court 

Case 2:24-cv-02267-SCR Document 11 Filed 10/30/24 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION TO REMAND; 2:24-cv-02267-SCR 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

direct the Clerk of the Court to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against 

Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DATE: October 23, 2024 /s/ Francesco Paulo Benavides* 

 FRANCESCO PAULO BENAVIDES 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 *Authorized via e-mail on October 17, 2024 

PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney 

 MATHEW W. PILE 

 Associate General Counsel 

 Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 

DATE: October 23, 2024 By: /s/ Justin L. Martin 

 JUSTIN L. MARTIN 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 

 

Attorneys for Defendant 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Based upon the parties’ stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 

42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment, and for cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the 

above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further 

proceedings pursuant to the Social Security Act § 205(g), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), 

sentence four. On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an administrative law 

judge for a new decision in accordance with the parties’ Stipulation. 

DATED: October 29, 2024 

Case 2:24-cv-02267-SCR Document 11 Filed 10/30/24 Page 2 of 2