Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00590/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00590-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ESCOBEDO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CASA CORONA FOODS, INC. dba Casa 

Corona, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:24-cv-00590-KES-SKO

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DECLINING 

SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER

PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS 

(Doc. 11)

Plaintiff Jose Escobedo seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of Title III of the 

Americans with Disabilities Act, California’s Unruh Act, and California Health and Safety Code 

§§ 19955 and 19959. See Doc. 1. The assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 

recommendations on June 11, 2024, recommending that the court decline to exercise 

supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims, and that it dismiss them without 

prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4). Doc. 11.

The findings and recommendations were served on June 11, 2024, and provided notice 

that any objections were due within 14 days of the date of service. Doc. 11 at 7. Plaintiff was 

informed that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of 

rights on appeal.” Id. (citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)). No 

objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. See Docket. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Case 1:24-cv-00590-SKO Document 17 Filed 08/01/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the court concludes the findings and 

recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, the court 

ORDERS:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on June 11, 2024, Doc. 11, are 

ADOPTED in full.

2. The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s 

claims arising under California’s Unruh Act and Cal. Health & Safety Code

§§ 19955 and 19959.

3. Plaintiff’s claims for violations of the Unruh Act and Cal. Health & Safety Code 

§§ 19955 and 19959 are DISMISSED without prejudice.

4. This matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 31, 2024 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:24-cv-00590-SKO Document 17 Filed 08/01/24 Page 2 of 2