Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02252/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02252-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2001\2252\order requiring response.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUKES, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

 WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 01-02252 CRB

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE

Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) has moved for leave to file a motion

for reconsideration (dkt. 822) of this Court’s order denying Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss. 

Specifically, Wal-Mart asks this Court to reconsider whether, for purposes of exhausting

their administrative remedies, absent class members may rely on the administrative charge

filed by former named plaintiff Stephanie Odle.

The Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to respond to Wal-Mart’s motion. In a filing of no

more than 12 pages, Plaintiffs shall address both whether leave should be granted to file the

motion as well as the merits of the proposed motion for reconsideration. Plaintiffs’ response

shall be submitted no later than 5:00 p.m. on December 27, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 13, 2012 CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:01-cv-02252-CRB Document 825 Filed 12/13/12 Page 1 of 1