Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-02334/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-02334-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES CAICO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-01-2334 MCE PAN P

vs.

V. R. KING, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed March 1, 2006, the court gave plaintiff 14 days to explain in writing

why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. The 14 days have

passed and plaintiff has not made the required showing or otherwise responded to the order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

/////

Case 2:01-cv-02334-MCE -PAN Document 57 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 6, 2006.

\004

\caic2334.ftp

Case 2:01-cv-02334-MCE -PAN Document 57 Filed 04/07/06 Page 2 of 2