Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-288/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 07-5944 

REGARDING SCHEDULING MDL NO. 1917 

Michael P. Kenny (mike.kenny@alston.com) 

Debra D. Bernstein (debra.bernstein@alston.com) 

Matthew D. Kent (matthew.kent@alston.com) 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 

Tel: (404) 881-7000 

Fax: (404) 881-7777 

James M. Wagstaffe, Esq. (SBN 95535) 

wagstaffe@kerrwagstaffe.com 

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 

100 Spear Street, 18th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105-1576 

Tel: (415) 371-8500 

Fax: (415) 371-0500 

Attorneys For Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to Individual Case No. 

3:13-cv-02171-SC 

Master File No. 3:07-cv-05944-SC (N.D. Cal.) 

MDL No. 1917 

DELL INC. and DELL PRODUCTS L.P., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

HITACHI, LTD., et al., 

Defendants.

Individual Case No. 3:13-cv-02171-SC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING

 Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (collectively “Dell”) and Defendants Mitsubishi 

Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc., and Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions 

America, Inc. (collectively “Mitsubishi Electric”) have conferred by and through their counsel 

and, subject to the Court’s approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

WHEREAS, September 5, 2014 was the deadline to complete fact discovery in the Dell 

action. 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2888 Filed 10/02/14 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 07-5944 

REGARDING SCHEDULING MDL NO. 1917 

WHEREAS, September 12, 2014 is the deadline for all parties to object to or move to 

compel additional responses for all written discovery responses in the Dell action. 

WHEREAS, Dell and Mitsubishi Electric continue to negotiate initial responses and 

production of documents by Mitsubishi Electric to Dell’s Second Set of Interrogatories and First 

Set of Requests for Production. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between counsel as 

follows: the deadline for Dell to move to compel additional responses for Dell’s Second Set of 

Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production to Mitsubishi Electric shall be moved to 

one week following Mitsubishi Electric’s initial responses and production. Dell does not waive 

any of its rights with respect to Mitsubishi Electric’s initial responses to Dell’s Second Set of 

Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production, including challenging the responses as 

untimely. If Mitsubishi Electric does not serve its initial responses or reach an agreement with 

Dell by September 26, 2014 as to its initial responses, Dell retains the right to move to compel 

responses from Mitsubishi Electric with respect to Dell’s Second Set of Interrogatories and Frist 

Set of Requests for Production to Mitsubishi Electric. All other dates in the Scheduling Order are 

unaffected by this stipulation. 

* * * 

The undersigned parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this 

stipulation as an order. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:___________________ ______________________________________ 

Hon. Samuel Conti 

United States District Judge 

October 2, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2888 Filed 10/02/14 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 07-5944 

REGARDING SCHEDULING MDL NO. 1917 

DATED: September 12, 2014 ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

 By: /s/ Debra D. Bernstein 

Michael P. Kenny, Esq. (GA Bar No. 415064) 

mike.kenny@alston.com 

Debra D. Bernstein, Esq. (GA Bar No. 054998) 

debra.bernstein@alston.com 

Matthew D. Kent, Esq. (GA Bar No. 526272) 

matthew.kent@alston.com 

Melissa M. Whitehead, Esq. (GA Bar No. 667932) 

melissa.whitehead@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 

Tel: (404) 881-7000 

Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 

Counsel for Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. 

JENNER & BLOCK LLP 

By: /s/ Michael T. Brody 

Terrence J. Truax (pro hac vice) 

ttruax@jenner.com 

Michael T. Brody (pro hac vice) 

mbrody@jenner.com 

Gabriel A. Fuentes 

gfuentes@jenner.com 

JENNER & BLOCK LLP 

353 North Clark Street 

Chicago, Illinois 60654-3456 

Tel: (312) 222-9350 

Fax: (312) 527-0484 

Brent Caslin (198682)_ 

bcaslin@jenner.com 

JENNER & BLOCK LLP 

633 West Fifth Street 

Suite 3600 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Tel: (213) 239-5100 

Fax: (213) 239-5199 

Counsel for Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, 

Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc., and Mitsubishi 

Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc. 

* * * 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2888 Filed 10/02/14 Page 3 of 3