Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01884/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01884-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBIN DASENBROOK,

Plaintiff,

vs.

A. ENENMOH, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:11-cv-01884 DAD DLB PC

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION 

TO DISREGARD

[ECF Nos. 185, 189]

Plaintiff Robin Dasenbrook (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding 

against Defendants Enenmoh, Page, Perez, and Adair for claims of negligence and deliberate 

indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

On July 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel the office of the Director of Nursing 

at CSATF, Corcoran State Prison, to produce documents listed within the Court’s subpoena 

duces tecum. On July 25, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court disregard his 

motion to compel in light of the Director of Nursing’s compliance on July 13, 2016. Good cause 

having been presented, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY 

///

///

Case 1:11-cv-01884-DAD-GSA Document 190 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to disregard is GRANTED, and the motion to compel is 

DISREGARDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 29, 2016 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01884-DAD-GSA Document 190 Filed 07/29/16 Page 2 of 2