Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01873/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01873-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On July 18, 2016, the Court held the hearing on the motions in limine. At the hearing, the 

plaintiff notified the Court he wished for the Court to continue the trial. In addition, the issue of the 

propriety of using a jury questionnaire was raised. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. No later than July 19, 2016, the plaintiff may file his motion to continue the trial. No 

later than July 21, 2016, the defendants may file opposition to the motion. No reply is permitted;

2. No later than July 21, 2016, counsel may file a joint statement proposing the use of a 

jury questionnaire or opposing the use of a jury questionnaire. In the event that either side wishes to 

use a jury questionnaire, the proposed questionnaire(s) SHALL be attached to the joint statement. If

neither side wishes to use a jury questionnaire, no filing is required.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 19, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JESSE TREVINO,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-001873 - JLT

AMENDED ORDER AFTER HEARING

Case 1:14-cv-01873-JLT Document 78 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 1