Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-01676/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-01676-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition

---

1

17-CV-1676 JLS (JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VAN J. ROSS,

Plaintiff,

v.

PADRES LP, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 17-CV-1676 JLS (JLB)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On March 28, 2019, the Court granted Defendants Padres, L.P., Christina Hall, and 

Ian Graham’s unopposed motion to dismiss and dismissed Plaintiff Van J. Ross’ First 

Amended Complaint. ECF No. 39. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended 

complaint within thirty days, noting that “[f]ailure to file within the time allotted may result 

in the dismissal of this action in its entirety.” Id. Plaintiff has not filed an amended 

complaint or filed for an extension of time. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(b), the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this action in its 

entirety for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court’s March 28, 2019 

Order. See Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 1169 (9th Cir. 2005) (“If a plaintiff does not 

take advantage of the opportunity to fix his complaint, a district court may convert the 

///

Case 3:17-cv-01676-JLS-JLB Document 40 Filed 10/03/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

17-CV-1676 JLS (JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

dismissal of the complaint into dismissal of the entire action.”). The Clerk of Court 

SHALL CLOSE the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 3, 2019

Case 3:17-cv-01676-JLS-JLB Document 40 Filed 10/03/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2