Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01767/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01767-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL CHESS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1767 LKK DAD P

vs.

J. DOVEY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. 

Plaintiff has filed with the court copies of his request for production of documents

from defendant David, request for production of documents from defendant Rahman, and request

for production of documents from defendant Roche. At the time of filing, plaintiff did not have

the benefit of the court’s March 8, 2010 order informing him that filing discovery requests or

responses to discovery requests with the court may result in an order of sanctions including but

not limited to a recommendation that this action be dismissed, so the court will not sanction

plaintiff at this time. Again, however, the court will direct the Clerk of the Court to disregard

plaintiff’s discovery requests and will remind plaintiff that neither discovery requests served on

an opposing party nor that party’s responses should be filed until such time as a party becomes

Case 2:07-cv-01767-DAD Document 78 Filed 03/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to

disregard plaintiff’s discovery requests (Doc. Nos. 75-77). 

DATED: March 9, 2010.

DAD:9

ches1767.disc

Case 2:07-cv-01767-DAD Document 78 Filed 03/10/10 Page 2 of 2