Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02266/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02266-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALLEN HAMMLER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HAAS, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-2266 AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915. However, the certificate portion of the in forma pauperis application has not been 

filled out and signed by an authorized prison official. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Nor does the 

attached prison trust account statement reflect the activity in plaintiff’s trust account for the sixmonth period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. See id. Plaintiff will be 

accorded an opportunity to submit both matters in a fully completed application to proceed in 

forma pauperis. 

 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The Clerk of the Court shall provide plaintiff with another copy of the in forma 

pauperis application used by this court; 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-02266-DAD-AC Document 4 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 2. Plaintiff shall, within thirty days from the filing date of this order, submit a fully 

completed in forma pauperis application that includes completion of the certificate portion of the 

application by an authorized prison official, and a copy of plaintiff’s prison trust account 

statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. 

3. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this 

action be dismissed without prejudice. 

DATED: November 10, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-02266-DAD-AC Document 4 Filed 11/10/15 Page 2 of 2