Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01247/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01247-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1247

DR. TIEMOKO COULIBALY; DR. FATOU GAYE-COULIBALY, 

Plaintiffs - Appellants, 

v. 

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEBORAH 

K. CHASANOW, Judge; CHARLES DAY, Magistrate Judge; THEODORE 

D. CHUANG, Judge; ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.; FANNIE 

MAE; NRT-MID-ATLANTIC TITLE SERVICE, LLC; LONG & FOSTER REAL 

ESTATE INC.; FIRST AMERICAN TITLE; FAACS; GUARDIAN FUNDING; 

INTEGRATED ASSET SERVICES; SIMCOX AND BARCLAY, LLP, 

Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. 

(8:15-cv-03276-GLR) 

Submitted: June 21, 2016 Decided: June 23, 2016

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Tiemoko Coulibaly, Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly, Appellants Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 16-1247 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/23/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Tiemoko Coulibaly and Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly appeal the 

district court’s order dismissing their civil action as barred 

by res judicata and immunity and for failure to state a claim 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) (2012). On appeal, we confine our 

review to the issues raised in the Appellants’ brief. See 4th 

Cir. R. 34(b). Because Appellants’ informal brief does not 

challenge with specific argument the bases for the district 

court’s disposition, Appellants have forfeited appellate review 

of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 

423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. We grant Appellants’ motion to seal 

medical documentation and deny the motion for transfer of venue. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1247 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/23/2016 Pg: 2 of 2