Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07296/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07296-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

REMAND OF ACTION TO STATE COURT – No. C06-07296 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TERRY T. JOHNSON, State Bar No. 121569 (tjohnson@wsgr.com)

BORIS T. FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838 (boris.feldman@wsgr.com)

CHERYL W. FOUNG, State Bar No. 108868 (cfoung@wsgr.com)

BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR, State Bar No. 203244 (bnoor@wsgr.com)

BRYAN KETROSER, State Bar No. 239105 (bketroser@wsgr.com)

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Defendant YING WU 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ERNESTO ESPINOZA, Derivatively On Behalf

of UTSTARCOM, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

YING WU, HONG LIANG LU, FRANCIS P. 

BARTON, WILLIAM HUANG, RUSSELL 

BOLTWOOD, THOMAS J. TOY, LARRY D. 

HORNER, JEFF CLARKE, ALLEN U. 

LENZMEIER, MICHAEL SOPHIE, GERALD 

S. SOLOWAY, SHAO NING J. CHOU, 

DAVID A. ROBISON, MASAYOSHI SON, 

CHAUNCEY SHEY, BETSY S. ATKINS, and 

DOES 1-25, inclusive,

Defendants,

-andUTSTARCOM, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Nominal Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-07296 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING REMAND OF 

ACTION TO STATE COURT

Case 3:06-cv-07296-SC Document 16 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 4
- 1 -

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

REMAND OF ACTION TO STATE COURT – No. C06-07296 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

WHEREAS, plaintiff Ernesto Espinoza originally filed this action November 17, 2006, in the 

Superior Court of the State of California ("Alameda County Superior Court"), Case No.RG06298775; 

WHEREAS, defendant Ying Wu ("Wu") removed this action to this Court on November 27, 

2006;

WHEREAS, plaintiff believes the following defendants were served in the above mentioned 

case prior to defendant Wu's filing of the Notice of Removal on November 27, 2006: 

Nominal defendant UTStarcom on 11/21/06; 

Individual defendant Russell Boltwood on 11/24/06 

Individual defendant Francis P. Barton on 11/25/06; 

Individual defendant Hong Liang Lu on 11/26/06; 

Individual defendant Gerald Soloway on 11/26/06; 

Individual defendant Michael Sophie on 11/26/06; 

WHEREAS, defendant Wu and plaintiff now agree remand is appropriate pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. §1441(b), which states that any action in which the federal district court does not have 

jurisdiction based on a federal question is removable “only if none of the parties in interest properly 

joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought”; 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby 

stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an order as follows: 

 The action captioned Espinoza v. Wu et. al., Case No. C06-07296 (RS) (N.D. Cal.) shall 

be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Alameda for 

further proceedings.

DATED: December 26, 2006 Respectfully submitted, 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, 

Professional Corporation 

 /s/ Bahram Seyedin-Noor 

BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR 

Attorneys for Defendant YING WU 

Case 3:06-cv-07296-SC Document 16 Filed 01/11/07 Page 2 of 4
- 2 -

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

REMAND OF ACTION TO STATE COURT – No. C06-07296 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: December 26, 2006 ROBBINS UMEDA & FINK, LLP

BRIAN J. ROBBINS 

MARC M. UMEDA 

SHANE P. SANDERS 

/s/ Marc M. Umeda 

MARC M. UMEDA 

610 West Ash Street, Suite 1800 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: (619) 525-3990 

Facsimile: (619) 525-3990 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

* * * 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION between the parties, and good cause appearing 

therefore: the action captioned Espinoza v. Wu et. al., Case No. C06-07296 (RS) (N.D. Cal.) shall 

be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Alameda for further 

proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated this ___ day of December, 2006. 

THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

1/11/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:06-cv-07296-SC Document 16 Filed 01/11/07 Page 3 of 4
- 3 -

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

REMAND OF ACTION TO STATE COURT – No. C06-07296 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I, Bahram Seyedin-Noor, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being 

used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Remand of Action to State Court. I 

hereby attest that Marc M. Umeda has concurred in this filing.

Dated: December 26, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Bahram Seyedin-Noor 

 Bahram Seyedin-Noor 

Attorneys for Defendant Ying Wu 

Case 3:06-cv-07296-SC Document 16 Filed 01/11/07 Page 4 of 4