Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02714/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02714-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEPOSITION DISCOVERY

FLANAGAN V. CITY OF RICHMOND ET AL, CASE NO. 3:14-CV-02714 EMC 

C. CHRISTINE MALONEY, Bar No. 226575

cmaloney@fosteremploymentlaw.com 

FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW 

3000 Lakeshore Avenue 

Oakland, California 94610 

Telephone: 510.763.1900 

Facsimile: 510.763.5952 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF RICHMOND and CHRISTOPHER 

MAGNUS 

DAVID M. POORE, Bar No. 192541 

dpoore@bplegalgroup.com 

SCOTT A. BROWN, Bar No. 177099 

sbrown@bplegalgroup.com 

BROWN POORE LLP 

1350 Treat Blvd., Suite 420 

Walnut Creek, CA 94597 

Telephone: 925.943.1166 

Facsimile: 925.943.1164 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LOUDESIA FLANAGAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

LOUDESIA FLANAGAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF RICHMOND; CHRISTOPHER 

MAGNUS; and DOES 1 through 50, 

inclusive, 

Defendants.

Case No. 3:14-cv-02714 EMC 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

EXTENDING DEPOSITION DISCOVERY 

UNTIL JULY 3, 2015 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

Dept.: Courtroom 5 - 17th Floor 

 Complaint Filed: June 11, 2014 

 Trial Date: December 7, 2015 

Case 3:14-cv-02714-EMC Document 30 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEPOSITION DISCOVERY

FLANAGAN V. CITY OF RICHMOND ET AL, CASE NO. 3:14-CV-02714 EMC 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the parties to this action, Plaintiff LOUDEISA 

FLANAGAN and Defendants CITY OF RICHMOND and CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, hereby 

STIPULATE to extending deposition discovery to accommodate the calendars of the witnesses. 

The original fact discovery cut-off in this case is set for June 4, 2015. The parties are jointly 

requesting an extension of that deadline – for deposition discovery only – until July 3, 2015. 

There exists good cause in which to extend factual discovery, in that the parties have 

timely noticed several depositions, including depositions of the parties, but, as a result of 

unavailability of several of the relevant witnesses, including at least one witness that has been 

served with a third-party subpoena, the parties will not be able to complete the deposition 

discovery until the end of June, or the beginning of July 2015. The parties are not requesting an 

extension for written discovery. The parties are not making this request for the purpose of any 

undue delay. Instead, the parties will suffer substantial prejudice, if they are unable to complete 

the key depositions in this case. No party would suffer any prejudice if this stipulation was 

granted. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties that the factual discovery cut-off date 

be extended to July 3, 2015, for deposition discovery only. 

SO STIPULATED. 

 

Dated: June 8, 2015 //s// C. Christine Maloney C. CHRISTINE MALONEY, ESQ. 

FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: June 8, 2015 

//s//David M. Poore 

DAVID M. POORE 

SCOTT A. BROWN 

BROWN POORE LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 3:14-cv-02714-EMC Document 30 Filed 06/08/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEPOSITION DISCOVERY

FLANAGAN V. CITY OF RICHMOND ET AL, CASE NO. 3:14-CV-02714 EMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, the Stipulation is GRANTED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the factual discovery cut-off date, which was originally 

set for June 4, 2015, be extended until July 3, 2015, for deposition discovery only. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June __, 2015 ___________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

8

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-02714-EMC Document 30 Filed 06/08/15 Page 3 of 3