Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05323/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05323-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND

 RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES PURSUANT TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # 69888

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

Airport Corporate Center

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120

Oakland, CA 94621

Telephone: (510) 839-5200

Facsimile: (510) 839-3882

GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq./ State Bar # 109173

LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET

486 41st Street, # 3

Oakland, CA 94609

(510) 420-0324

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DORIS DUCRE; CHARLES ALLEN; K.A. No. C-04-5323-WHA

by and through his guardian ad litem, 

CHARLES ALLEN, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR 

 Plaintiffs, PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

AND RESPONSES TO SPECIAL

vs. INTERROGATORIES PURSUANT TO

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CITY OF RICHMOND, a municipal corporation; 

CHARLES P. BENNET in his capacity as 

Chief of Police for CITY OF RICHMOND;

JOHN ARGUMANIZ, individually, and in his 

capacity as a Richmond police officer; ERIC SMITH, 

individually, and in his capacity as a Richmond police 

officer; MICHAEL ROOD, individually, and in his 

capacity as a Richmond police officer; 

MITCH PEIXOTO, individually, and in his capacity 

as a Richmond police officer; LOUIE TIRONA, 

individually, and in his capacity as a Richmond police 

officer; and, DOES 6-100, inclusive, 

 Defendants. /

STIPULATION

Case 3:04-cv-05323-WHA Document 33 Filed 09/29/05 Page 1 of 3
 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND

 RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES PURSUANT TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

2

 All parties hereby stipulate and agree, by and through their respective counsel, as follows:

 1. That defendant CITY OF RICHMOND (ACITY@) will produce the documents and tapes

responsive to plaintiffs= Request for Production of Documents Response Numbers 10, 11, 12, 13,

14, 15, 16, and 17, as agreed to in defense counsel=s letter to plaintiff=s counsel, dated 

9-16-05, a copy of which letter is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (which letter responded to

plaintiffs= counsel=s letter to defense counsel, dated 9-9-05, a copy of which is attached hereto as

Exhibit 2;

 2. That defendant CITY will serve Responses to plaintiffs= Special Interrogatories, Responses

Numbers 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9, as agreed to in defense counsel=s letter to plaintiff=s counsel, dated 

9-16-05, a copy of which letter is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (which letter responded to

plaintiffs= counsel=s letter to defense counsel, dated 9-9-05, a copy of which is attached hereto as

Exhibit 2;

 3. That defendant CITY serve, if they can be made from existing tapes that are available,

better quality copies of audiocassette tapes where voices can readily be heard, made by the

Richmond Police Dept. regarding the subject incident of 8-12-04 of: plaintiff Klentae Allen;

defendant officer Mitch Peixoto; Sgt. Tenedora (Davis Police Dept.); Det. LaFond (Davis Police

Dept.); Officer Steve Harris (Richmond Police Dept.); Det. Mark Herman (Davis Police Dept.);

Det. Penrose (Davis Police Dept.); Det. Penrose (Davis Police Dept.); Det. Longacre (Davis

Police Dept.); Det. Joe Anderson (Richmond Police Dept.); and, Bell Street Dispatch Tape.

The abovementioned audiocassette tapes are referred to in Ms. Libet=s letter to Mr. Sturges,

dated

9-20-05, a copy of which letter is attached hereto as Exhibit 3;

 4. That defendant CITY is to serve the above-referenced Responses, documents, and tapes so

they are received by the Law Offices of Gayla B. Libet by no later than September 27, 2005;

and,

 5. The above-referenced Responses, documents, and tapes are to be served pursuant to the

Stipulated Protective Order that has been filed in this case.

Case 3:04-cv-05323-WHA Document 33 Filed 09/29/05 Page 2 of 3
 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND

 RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES PURSUANT TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

3

 LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET

Dated: 9/22/05 By: /S/

 GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq.

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

 BASSI, MARTINI, EDLIN & BLUM LLP

Dated: 9/22/05 By: /S/

 PETER STURGES, Esq.

 Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

 HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP

United States District Court Judge

September 29, 2005

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:04-cv-05323-WHA Document 33 Filed 09/29/05 Page 3 of 3