Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-02102/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-02102-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jose Rosciano,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Experian, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-14-02102-PHX-NVW

ORDER 

 

 Before the court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal, etc. (Doc. 

52), the Response (Doc. 53), and the Reply (Doc. 54). In the court’s discretion, late 

commencement of the arbitration will be allowed. The court also concludes, upon 

reconsideration of its April 1, 2015 order (Doc. 50), that Plaintiff’s failure to comply with 

the prior orders compelling arbitration (Doc. 37, 49) does not warrant dismissal with 

prejudice. Those orders require arbitration only of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant 

T-Mobile USA, Inc.; they do not subject to arbitration any other party against whom this 

case has already been dismissed. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Order of 

Dismissal, etc., (Doc. 52) is granted. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:14-cv-02102-NVW Document 56 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the order of April 1, 2015 (Doc. 50), is vacated. 

 Dated: May 1, 2015. 

Neil V. Wake

United States District Judge

Case 2:14-cv-02102-NVW Document 56 Filed 05/01/15 Page 2 of 2