Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02707/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02707-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICIA A. MCCOLM,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2707 MCE EFB PS

vs.

RESTORATION GROUP, INC., et al., ORDER

Defendants. 

 /

This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the

undersigned under Local Rule 72-302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

Plaintiff has recently filed several documents, some of which appear to contain requests

to continue the hearing calendared for March 14, 2007 on defendants’ motion to dismiss, and for

additional time to file an opposition. The court notes that plaintiff’s requests for additional time

are buried in various filings rather than being expressly made pursuant to Local Rule 6-144. To

the extent plaintiff’s recent filings can be construed as a request for extensions of time under that

Local Rule, such requests are denied. 

The court notes that it previously granted plaintiff an extension of time to file an

opposition to defendants’ motion, and continued the hearing in light of that extension. Plaintiff

has had ample notice of defendants’ motion, which was filed on February 1, 2007. The

Case 2:06-cv-02707-MCE -EFB Document 64 Filed 03/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

document styled “Plaintiff’s Objection to Defendants Untimely Motion Under FRCP 12(b)(6)

and 12(b)(1); To Question Not Ripe for Determination Absent Discovery Re: Disputed Facts;

and to Insufficient Time to Accommodate Limitations of Disability in Response to Motion

Construed in Contravention of Objection,” shall be construed by the court as plaintiff’s

opposition to the motion to dismiss. 

Unless otherwise notified by the court, the hearing remains set for March 14, 2007, at

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 25 before the undersigned. No telephonic appearances will be

allowed. Failure to appear may be deemed a withdrawal of the motion or the opposition, and

may result in the imposition of sanctions. E.D. Cal. L.R. 78-230(j). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: March 8, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-02707-MCE -EFB Document 64 Filed 03/08/07 Page 2 of 2