Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02712/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02712-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RABINDRA PRASAD dba PRASAD 

CHIROPRACTOR, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PRAKASH NARAYAN, PAYAL 

NARAYAN, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-2712 KJM AC (PS) 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to the United 

States Magistrate Judge by E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21). 

 On January 5, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 

served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings 

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 4. Defendants have filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 5. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 

the file, the court adopts the magistrate court’s findings and recommendation that this case be 

remanded. The court however, writes separately to DENY as MOOT defendants’ applications to 

Case 2:15-cv-02712-KJM-AC Document 6 Filed 09/28/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

proceed in forma pauperis, having already affirmed this case should be remanded to state court. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 5, 2016 (ECF No. 4), are adopted in 

to the extent consistent with this order; and 

 2. This action is remanded in light of 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), to the California Superior 

Court, Sacramento County, for lack of federal jurisdiction. 

DATED: September 28, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-02712-KJM-AC Document 6 Filed 09/28/16 Page 2 of 2