Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00966/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00966-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1355 Petition for Return of Property

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 5:10-cv-00966-JF 

RICHARD B. GOETZ (State Bar No. 115666) 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

400 South Hope Street 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Telephone: (213) 430-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 

E-Mail: rgoetz@omm.com 

 

ROBERTA H. VESPREMI (State Bar No. 225067) 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

2765 Sand Hill Road 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 473-2600 

Facsimile: (650) 473-2601 

E-Mail: rvespremi@omm.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MCNEIL-PPC, INC. 

KATHRYN G. SPELMAN (State Bar No. 154512) 

DANIEL H. FINGERMAN (State Bar No. 229683) 

MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C. 

RiverPark Tower, Suite 1650 

333 West San Carlos Street 

San Jose, California 95110 

Telephone: (408) 279-7000 

Facsimile: (408) 998-1473 

E-Mail: kspelman@mount.com 

 dfingerman@mount.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

THE GLAD PRODUCTS COMPANY, et al. 

 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 5:10-cv-00966-JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT 

MCNEIL-PPC, INC.’S TIME TO 

ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE 

RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 

------------------

Case 5:10-cv-00966-JF Document 45 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 5:10-cv-00966-JF 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff San Francisco Technology Inc. 

(“plaintiff”) and defendant McNeil-PPC, Inc. (“defendant”), by and through their counsel of 

record as follows: 

 WHEREAS plaintiff filed its Complaint on March 5, 2010, and defendant was served on 

March 18, 2010; 

 WHEREAS the current deadline for defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to 

the Complaint is April 7, 2010; 

WHEREAS defendant has not previously sought to extend its time to answer, move or 

otherwise respond to the Complaint; 

 WHEREAS because defendant’s counsel requires additional time to adequately 

investigate the pertinent facts and applicable law, and to determine how to appropriately respond 

to the Complaint, the plaintiff and defendant respectfully request the Court to extend the 

defendant’s time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 14, 2010. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate 

as follows: Defendant’s last day to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint is May 

14, 2010. 

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: March 24, 2010 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: ___________________________________ 

Roberta H. Vespremi 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MCNEIL-PPC, INC. 

Dated: March 24, 2010 MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C. 

By: ___________________________________ 

Daniel H. Fingerman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

/s/ Roberta H. Vespremi

/s/ Daniel H. Fingerman

Case 5:10-cv-00966-JF Document 45 Filed 03/30/10 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 - 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 5:10-cv-00966-JF 

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE 

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from 

counsel for plaintiff, Daniel H. Fingerman. 

Dated: March 24, 2010 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: ___________________________________ 

Roberta H. Vespremi 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MCNEIL-PPC, INC. 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March ____, 2010 

______________________________________ 

The Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel 

United States District Judge 

MP1:1191666.1 

/s/ Roberta H. Vespremi

26

Case 5:10-cv-00966-JF Document 45 Filed 03/30/10 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 4 - 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 5:10-cv-00966-JF 

Certificate of Service

The undersigned certifies that on March 24, 2010, the foregoing document was filed with 

the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, using the court’s 

electronic filing system (ECF), in compliance with Civil L.R. 5-4 and General Order 45. The 

ECF system serves a “Notice of Electronic Filing” to all parties and counsel who have appeared 

in this action, who have consented under Civil L.R. 5-5 and General Order 45 to accept that 

Notice as service of this document. 

Date: March 24, 2010 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: ___________________________________ 

Roberta H. Vespremi 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MCNEIL-PPC, INC. 

/s/ Roberta H. Vespremi

Case 5:10-cv-00966-JF Document 45 Filed 03/30/10 Page 4 of 4