Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-02824/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-02824-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

Order 

Case No. 17-cv-02824-JST 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., 

RESOLUTE FP US, INC., RESOLUTE FP 

AUGUSTA, LLC, FIBREK GENERAL 

PARTNERSHIP, FIBREK U.S., INC., FIBREK 

INTERNATIONAL INC., and RESOLUTE FP 

CANADA, INC., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL (aka 

“GREENPEACE STICHTING COUNCIL”). 

GREENPEACE, INC., GREENPEACE FUND, 

INC., FORESTETHICS, DANIEL BRINDIS, 

AMY MOAS, MATTHEW DAGGETT, ROLF 

SKAR, TODD PAGLIA, and JOHN AND JANE 

DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 17-cv-02824-JST 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Date: 

Time: 

Location: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor: 

The Court has considered the parties’ Stipulation Regarding Defendants Filing Replies in 

Support of Their Motions to Dismiss and/or Strike the Amended Complaint in Excess of the Page 

Limit Imposed by Local Rule 7-4. For the reasons stated therein, the Stipulation is GRANTED and 

the Greenpeace Defendants’ reply in support of its motion to dismiss and/or strike the Amended 

Complaint may not exceed 30 pages; Greenpeace Fund’s reply in support of its motion to dismiss 

and/or strike the Amended Complaint may not exceed 20 pages; and Stand’s reply in support of 

its motion to dismiss and/or strike the Amended Complaint may not exceed 20 pages. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________, 2018 By: ________________________________ 

THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

April 7

Case 3:17-cv-02824-JST Document 212 Filed 05/08/18 Page 1 of 1