Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05547/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05547-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND 

HEARING DATE OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05547 (EMC) 

GARY D. FRIEDMAN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

gary.friedman@weil.com 

DANIEL J. VENDITTI (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

daniel.venditti@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153 

Telephone: (212) 310-8000 

Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 

CHRISTOPHER J. COX (Bar No. 151650) 

chris.cox@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP 

201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Telephone: (650) 802-3029 

Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TUESDAY MORNING, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CYNTHIA MCMAHON, on behalf of 

herself, all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TUESDAY MORNING, INC., a Texas 

corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05547 (EMC)

(Removed from Contra Costa Superior Court 

Case No. C-14-02113) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE OF 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

Case 3:14-cv-05547-EMC Document 36 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND 

HEARING DATE OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 1 CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05547 (EMC)

Defendant Tuesday Morning, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Cynthia McMahon 

(“Plaintiff”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, 

hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, on July 20, 2015, Plaintiff filed her Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave 

to File First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 34) (“Motion”), which Motion Plaintiff noticed to be 

heard on August 27, 2015; 

WHEREAS, due to previously scheduled conflicts, including long planned vacation —of 

which counsel for Defendant advised Plaintiff’s counsel in advance of the filing of Plaintiff’s 

Motion—Defendant is not available for Plaintiff’s Motion to be heard on August 27, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, due to these scheduling conflicts, Defendant has requested to continue the 

hearing date on Plaintiff’s Motion to October 1, 2015 at 1:30 p.m.; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has consented to Defendant’s request to continue the hearing date 

on Plaintiff’s Motion to October 1, 2015 at 1:30 p.m.; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 7-3, Defendant’s opposition 

to Plaintiff’s Motion is currently due on August 3, 2015 and Plaintiff’s reply is due on August 

10, 2015; 

WHEREAS, Defendant has requested to extend its deadline to file its opposition to 

Plaintiff’s Motion to August 28, 2015 and Plaintiff’s reply deadline to September 11, 2015; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to extend the deadline for Defendant to file its 

opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to August, 28, 2015 and Plaintiff’s reply to September 11, 2015; 

WHEREAS, in sum, the Parties have agreed to the following revised briefing and hearing 

schedule on Plaintiff’s Motion: 

 Due date for Defendant’s Opposition: August 28, 2015 

 Due date for Plaintiff’s Reply: September 11, 2015 

 Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion: October 1, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. 

 WHEREAS, the parties have not previously requested to modify the briefing schedule or 

hearing date on Plaintiff’s Motion; 

Case 3:14-cv-05547-EMC Document 36 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND 

HEARING DATE OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 2 CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05547 (EMC)

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, 

through their respective counsel and subject to the Court’s approval, that (1) Defendant’s 

deadline to file its opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion shall be August 28, 2015; (2) Plaintiff’s 

deadline to file her reply shall be September 11, 2015; and (3) the hearing date on Plaintiff’s 

Motion be continued from August 27, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. to October 1, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: July 30, 2015 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

By: /s/ Gary D. Friedman 

Gary D. Friedman (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Attorneys for Defendant 

TUESDAY MORNING, INC. 

DATED: July 30, 2015 SETAREH LAW GROUP 

By: /s/ Shaun Setareh 

Shaun Setareh 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CYNTHIA MCMAHON 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 

 

Case 3:14-cv-05547-EMC Document 36 Filed 08/03/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND 

HEARING DATE OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 3 CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05547 (EMC)

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: By: 

The Honorable Edward M. Chen

United States District Judge

August 3, 2015

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-05547-EMC Document 36 Filed 08/03/15 Page 4 of 4