Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00975/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00975-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRED WALDROP, No. 2:06-cv-0975-MCE-DAD-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

KENTON DEWARD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On July 24, 2006, the magistrate judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which

contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. 

///

Case 2:06-cv-00975-MCE -DAD Document 12 Filed 01/09/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On December 1, 2006, the Findings and Recommendations were reserved on Plaintiff at his last known address and Plaintiff was

granted an additional twenty (20) days to submit a proper notice

of change of address, any objections to the July 24, 2006

Findings and Recommendations, and a non-prisoner in forma

pauperis application. Plaintiff was forewarned that failure to

comply with the Order would result in the Findings and

Recommendations being submitted to the district judge. The time

period has now expired and Plaintiff has not filed a proper

notice of change of address, has not filed objections to the

Findings and Recommendations, has not filed a non-prisoner in

forma pauperis application, and has not otherwise responded to

the Court’s Order.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that: 

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 24, 2006,

are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure

to file a properly completed application to proceed in forma

pauperis and for failure to comply with Court Orders.

DATED: January 9, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00975-MCE -DAD Document 12 Filed 01/09/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

Case 2:06-cv-00975-MCE -DAD Document 12 Filed 01/09/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

4

Case 2:06-cv-00975-MCE -DAD Document 12 Filed 01/09/07 Page 4 of 4