Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06524/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06524-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALONSO LIZARRAGA-RIOS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

)

v. )

)

)

)

R. D. ANDREWS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

____________________________________)

CV F 04 6524 AWI LJO HC

ORDER STAYING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF MARCH 16, 2005

[Doc. #8]

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER LEAVE

TO FILE OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO SERVE MOTION TO DISMISS ON

PETITIONER

[Doc. #6]

Petitioner is detained by the United States Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement

(“BICE”) and is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241. 

On January 28, 2005, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition.

On March 16, 2005, this Court issued a Findings and Recommendation which recommended

Respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted and the petition be dismissed.

On April 12, 2005, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

Petitioner states he did not receive Respondent’s motion to dismiss and thus did not have an

Case 1:04-cv-06524-AWI-LJO Document 10 Filed 04/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 2

opportunity to file an opposition. Review of the docket reveals that Petitioner may not have been

served with the motion to dismiss. Therefore, Petitioner will be granted leave to file an opposition to

the motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1) The Findings and Recommendation issued on March 16, 2005, is STAYED;

2) Petitioner is GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order to file an

opposition to Respondent’s motion to dismiss; and

3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of Respondent’s motion to dismiss

[Doc. #6] on Petitioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 21, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06524-AWI-LJO Document 10 Filed 04/21/05 Page 2 of 2