Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-02631/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-02631-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case Number: 10CV2631 LHK 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LIMITED DISCOVERY AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION

**E-Filed 8/9/2010**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

NANOEXA CORPORATION, a California

Corporation 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, an Illinois

Corporation, UCHICAGO ARGONNE LLC, an

Illinois limited liability company

 Defendants.

Case Number: 10CV2631 LHK

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR LIMITED

DISCOVERY AND DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

EXTENDED TIME TO FILE AN

OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

[re: dockets no. 30 and 31]

On July 30, 2010, Defendants moved for limited discovery to be heard on shortened

 time [dkt. #30] and moved for an extension of time to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for

a preliminary injunction [dkt. #31]. Having failed to show good cause, it is ORDERED that both 

motions shall be DENIED. Defendants must respond to Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary 

injunction by August 13, 2010 as agreed to in the parties joint stipulation [dkt. #20] and as

 required by the July 21, 2010 Order adopting the joint stipulation [dkt. #23]. Pursuant to the

joint stipulation and the July 21, 2010 Order, Plaintiff has waived its right to file a reply. 

Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction [dkt. #15] remains set for hearing on 

Thursday, August 26, 2010 at 1:30 PM. 

Case 5:10-cv-02631-LHK Document 42 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case Number: 10CV2631 LHK 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LIMITED DISCOVERY AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 9, 2010

 

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cv-02631-LHK Document 42 Filed 08/09/10 Page 2 of 2