Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02659/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02659-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY O’KEEFE,

Plaintiff,

v.

JERRY BROWN, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2: 11-cv-2659 KJM KJN P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The undersigned separately issued an order screening plaintiff’s fifth 

amended complaint. In this order, the undersigned found that defendants Hoffman, Heatsie, 

Bonilla, Brown and Beard should be dismissed. The undersigned also found that plaintiff’s claim 

alleging that defendants’ failure to transfer him to the R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility 

(“RJDCF”) violated his right to due process did not state a potentially colorable claim for relief.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the separately issued order, IT IS HEREBY 

RECOMMENDED that defendants Hoffman, Heatsie, Bonilla, Brown and Beard and plaintiff’s 

claim alleging a violation of due process based on defendants’ failure to transfer him to RJDCF 

be dismissed. 

////

////

Case 2:11-cv-02659-KJM-KJN Document 174 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: January 23, 2015

Ok2659.fr(2)

Case 2:11-cv-02659-KJM-KJN Document 174 Filed 01/23/15 Page 2 of 2