Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02903/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02903-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

Neeley v. Colvin Stipulation and Order for EAJA

E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-02903-KJN

JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND CSBN 154575

Attorney at Law

P.O. Box 4476

Sunriver, OR 97707

Telephone: 541-419-0074

Fax: 541-593-4452

Email: jaf@forslundlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JENNIFER F. NEELEY, )

) Case No. 2:14-cv-02903-KJN

Plaintiff, )

) STIPULATION AND

) ORDER FOR EAJA FEES

)

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, )

Acting Comm’r of Social Security, )

)

Defendant, )

__________________________________ )

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned 

counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees and 

expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount 

of SIX THOUSAND dollars and ZERO cents ($6,000.00). This amount represents 

compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of plaintiff by counsel in connection with 

this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government 

will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s 

attorney. The government’s ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and 

expenses are subject to an offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s 

Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). After the order of EAJA 

fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine if they are subject to an offset.

Case 2:14-cv-02903-KJN Document 27 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2
Neeley v. Colvin Stipulation and Order for EAJA

E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-02903-KJN

If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees and expenses are not subject to an offset 

under Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010) and The Department of Treasury’s Offset 

Program, then the check for EAJA fees and expenses shall be made payable to Jacqueline A. 

Forslund, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney. The parties 

agree that whether the EAJA check is made payable to Plaintiff or Jacqueline A. Forslund such 

check shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney at the following address: Jacqueline A. Forslund, 

Attorney at Law, P.O. Box 4476, Sunriver, OR 97707.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: January 19, 2016 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND

Attorney at Law

/s/Jacqueline A. Forslund

JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND

Attorney for Plaintiff

Date: January 19, 2016 BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

DEBORAH STACHEL

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

/s/Sharon Lahey

SHARON LAHEY

Special Assistant United States Attorney

*By email authorization

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2016

Case 2:14-cv-02903-KJN Document 27 Filed 01/29/16 Page 2 of 2