Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01125/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01125-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRANDON ALEXANDER 

FERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTION & REHABILITATION, et 

al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:11-cv-01125 MCE KJN (PC)

ORDER

On December 9, 2013 defendant filed a motion to quash subpoenas pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 45. ECF No. 52. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. 

Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 

opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 

the granting of the motion . . . .” On February 7, 2012 plaintiff was advised of the requirements 

for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a 

waiver of opposition to the motion.1 ECF No. 11.

////

 

1

See also ECF No. 36 at 5 (“If disputes arise about the parties’ obligations to respond to requests 

for discovery, the parties shall comply with all pertinent rules including Rules 5, 7, 11, 26, and 37 

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules 134, 135, 130, 131, 110, 142, and 230(l) of the 

Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California; unless 

otherwise ordered, Local Rule 251 shall not apply.”).

Case 2:11-cv-01125-MCE-KJN Document 53 Filed 01/07/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for 

imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of 

the Court.” In the order filed February 7, 2012, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with 

the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one days of the 

date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion to quash subpoenas. 

Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a 

order quashing the subpoenas.

Dated: January 7, 2014

fern1125.ord

Case 2:11-cv-01125-MCE-KJN Document 53 Filed 01/07/14 Page 2 of 2