Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02399/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02399-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 150
Nature of Suit: Overpayments &amp; Enforcement of Judgments
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION 

14-CV-2399-JAM-KJN 

PAUL D. TRIPODI II, State Bar No. 162380 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

633 West Fifth Street 

Suite 1550 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (323) 210-2900 

Facsimile: (866) 974-7329 

Email: ptripodi@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ZIPMARK, INC. and JAY BHATTACHARYA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MYECHECK, INC. a California Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ZIPMARK, INC., JAY BHATTACHARYA, and 

Does 1 – 20, Inclusive, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 14-CV-2399-JAM-KJN 

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING 

THE TIME TO ANSWER 

Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez 

Case 2:14-cv-02399-JAM-KJN Document 22 Filed 03/31/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION 

14-CV-2399-JAM-KJN 

Pursuant to L.R. 143 and L.R. 144, the parties jointly submit this Stipulation. 

WHEREAS, on October 10, 2014, plaintiff MyECheck, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed the abovecaptioned complaint against Zipmark, Inc. and Jay Bhattacharya (collectively “Defendants”) 

(ECF No.1); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff did not serve a copy of the Complaint on Defendants, but 

Defendants subsequently agreed to waive service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d); 

WHEREAS, on December 23, 2014, the parties submitted a joint stipulation waiving 

service and setting a date of January 8, 2015 for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise 

respond to the Complaint (ECF No. 5); 

WHEREAS, on January 8, 2015, Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint in its 

entirety (ECF No. 6); 

WHEREAS, on March 17, 2015, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ 

motion to dismiss the Complaint, and, inter alia, dismissed all claims against Defendant Jay 

Bhattacharya (ECF No. 19); 

WHEREAS, Defendant Zipmark, Inc. (“Zipmark”) has not yet filed an Answer to the 

Complaint; 

WHEREAS, Zipmark’s Answer is presently due March 31, 2015; 

WHEREAS, the parties would like to have additional time to engage in settlement 

discussions prior to Zipmark’s Answer being filed; 

It is hereby STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned counsel for 

the parties that Zipmark’s time to further respond to the Complaint shall be extended by thirty 

(30) days, and Zipmark’s Answer shall be due no later than April 30, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-02399-JAM-KJN Document 22 Filed 03/31/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION 

CV-00543-JAM-KJN 

-2- 

Dated: March 27, 2015 

By: /s/ Brian R. Katz 

Brian R. Katz 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

MyECheck, Inc. 

Dated: March 27, 2015 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Paul D. Tripodi, II 

Paul D. Tripodi, II 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Zipmark, Inc. and Jay Bhattacharya 

Dated: March 30, 2015 IT IS SO ORDERED 

/s/ John A. Mendez____________ 

 Honorable Judge John A. Mendez 

Case 2:14-cv-02399-JAM-KJN Document 22 Filed 03/31/15 Page 3 of 3