Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_24-cv-00306/USCOURTS-azd-4_24-cv-00306-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ernesto Manuel Mejia,

Petitioner,

v. 

Unknown Hudson,

Respondent.

No. CV-24-00306-TUC-JCH

ORDER 

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau's Report and 

Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 11). Judge Rateau recommends denying Petitioner's

Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal 

Custody (the "Petition"). See id. at 12. No objections to the R&R were filed. See generally 

Docket. 

A district court reviews objected-to portions of an R&R de novo. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Remsing, 874 F.2d 614, 617 

(9th Cir. 1989). Failure to timely object may be considered a waiver of a party's right to de 

novo consideration of the issues. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121–22 

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The advisory committee's notes to Rule 72(b) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure state that, "[w]hen no timely objection is filed, the court need only 

satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the 

recommendation" of a magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note to 

1983 addition; see also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

Case 4:24-cv-00306-JCH Document 12 Filed 12/11/24 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

After independent review, the Court is satisfied that Judge Rateau's 

recommendation is sound. The Court will adopt the R&R in full. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED adopting in full the R&R (Doc. 11). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petition (Doc. 1). The Clerk of the 

Court shall enter judgment and close this case. 

Dated this 10th day of December, 2024.

Case 4:24-cv-00306-JCH Document 12 Filed 12/11/24 Page 2 of 2