Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00756/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00756-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANNE DELANEY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant. /

No. C 05-00756 SI

ORDER REOPENING CASE

On February 22, 2005, plaintiff filed this action, seeking review of a November 15, 2002,

decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Defendant, however, was unable to locate the

recording of plaintiff’s hearing. Accordingly, the parties stipulated to remand this case to the Social

Security Administration for a de novo hearing. The recording was subsequently found, and on May 5,

2006, the Commissioner reinstated her November 15, 2002, decision as the final agency decision in this

case.

Plaintiff now moves to reopen this case. The Court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion. Pursuant to

Civil Local Rule 16-5, within 90 days of this order, the defendant must serve and file an answer,

together with a certified copy of the transcript of the administrative record. Within 30 days of receipt

of defendant’s answer, plaintiff must file a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Civil Local Rule

7-2 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Defendant must serve and file any opposition or countermotion within 30 days of service of plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff may serve and file a reply within 14

days after service of defendant’s opposition or counter-motion. Unless the Court orders otherwise, upon

the conclusion of this briefing schedule, the matter will be deemed submitted for decision by the District

Case 3:05-cv-00756-SI Document 15 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Court without oral argument.

Plaintiff’s motion to reopen this case is GRANTED (Docket No. 14).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 30, 2006 

 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00756-SI Document 15 Filed 07/05/06 Page 2 of 2