Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453-52/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARC OPPERMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PATH, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST (JCS)

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY 

DISPUTE

Re: Dkt. No. 662

For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, Plaintiffs request to compel Defendant 

Path and non-party Redpoint Ventures to produce documents is GRANTED IN PART AND 

DENIED IN PART. The request for Path to produce all communications and PowerPoint 

presentations related to Path’s Series B funding is overbroad and is therefore DENIED, except that 

it is GRANTED as to communications and PowerPoint (or similar) presentations regarding Series 

B funding that advertise to investors Path’s growth in users. Path shall produce such documents 

by May 31, 2016. Path may redact sensitive, non-responsive information in a narrowly-tailored 

manner consistent with the Court’s instructions and Path’s representations at the hearing.

Documents describing Path’s use of address book data in the context of Series B funding 

are also relevant and subject to discovery, but because Path has already searched for and 

represented that it has no such documents, Path need not conduct a duplicative search for those 

documents. Path shall, however, produce any such documents that it may uncover in the course of 

discovery. 

Plaintiffs’ request for documents from Redpoint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 29, 2016 ______________________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

Chief Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 705 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 1