Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01276/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01276-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The court deems this document filed the date plaintiff served it. See Houston v. Lack,

487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988) (notice of appeal by pro se litigant deemed filed when the prisoner

delivers it to prison authorities for delivery to the court).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHNATHAN CONRAD FULLER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1276 FCD EFB P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 4, 2007, the court denied plaintiff’s request to continue summary

judgment proceedings. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(f). On June 27, 20071

, plaintiff filed a request that

the court amend that order. The court construes plaintiff’s request as one for reconsideration. 

For the following reasons, the request is denied.

The ruling of a magistrate judge is final if no reconsideration is sought within ten (10)

court days calculated from the date of service of the ruling on the parties. Local Rule 72-303(b). 

////

Case 2:04-cv-01276-FCD-EFB Document 60 Filed 07/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court served its ruling on June 4, 2007. Including the three additional days required since

the court served the order by mail, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), plaintiff had until June 22, 2007, to

seek reconsideration. Plaintiff did not submit his motion to prison authorities until June 27,

2007. The court finds that plaintiff filed his motion for reconsideration after the June 4, 2007,

order became final. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for reconsideration is denied. The

Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate number 58 on the docket.

Dated: July 11, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-01276-FCD-EFB Document 60 Filed 07/11/07 Page 2 of 2