Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04302/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04302-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

EDWARD D. JOHNSON (SBN 189475) 

SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 205584) 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000

Facsimile: (650) 331-4537

wjohnson@mayerbrownrowe.com

sgupta@mayerbrownrowe.com

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

RICHARD J. FAVRETTO

1909 K Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20006

Telephone: (202) 263-3000

Facsimile: (202) 263-3300

rfavretto@mayerbrownrowe.com

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MICHAEL R. CARLSON, 

on behalf of himself and all others similarly

situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC, VIRGIN

ATLANTIC AIRWAYS LIMITED, and 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CV 06-04302-MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 

6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, in light of the transfer motion now pending before the 

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) captioned In re International Air

Transportation Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1793, Plaintiff Michael R. 

Carlson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants British Airways Plc, Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited, and 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-04302-MJJ

Case 3:06-cv-04302-MJJ Document 6 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 6 Case 3:06-cv-04302-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/08/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United Air Lines, Inc. (collectively, the “Defendants”), through their respective counsel, hereby 

stipulate and agree as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendants’ time to answer, move

or otherwise plead is enlarged until the later of (1) the date when the Defendants would 

otherwise be required to file a response pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, or (2) 45 

days after the JPML rules on the pending motion and consolidates each related action in a single 

court, and a consolidated complaint is filed by all plaintiffs in the single transferee Court and 

served on Defendants.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that each defense counsel designated 

below shall accept service on behalf of the Defendant represented by each such counsel of all 

complaints in the above-captioned matter, including any amended or consolidated complaints, 

and further, that such Defendant shall not contest sufficiency of process or service of process.

This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver of any other defense including, but not limited to, 

the defenses of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction or improper venue. Nothing in this 

paragraph shall obligate any Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to any complaint

until the time provided in the preceding paragraph. The above notwithstanding, should any 

Defendant, except pursuant to court order, respond to any complaint in a related matter filed in 

another United States District Court prior to the date contemplated by this stipulation, then such 

Defendant shall make a simultaneous response to the complaint in the above-captioned matter.

Respectfully submitted,

-2-

Dated: August 8, 2006 GANCEDO & NIEVES LLP

/s/ ______

Tina B. Nieves (SBN 134384) 

Hector G. Gancedo (SBN 132139) 

Amy M. Boomhouwer (SBN 221869) 

GANCEDO & NIEVES LLP

144 W. Colorado Boulevard 

Pasadena, CA 91105 

T: (626) 685-9800 

F: (626) 685-9808 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael R. Carlson

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-04302-MJJ

Case 3:06-cv-04302-MJJ Document 6 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 2 of 6 Case 3:06-cv-04302-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/08/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -3-

Dated: August 8, 2006 

Dated: August 8, 2006 

Dated: August 8, 2006 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP

/s/ ______

Edward D. Johnson (SBN 189475) 

Shirish Gupta (SBN 205584) 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

T: (650) 331-2000 

F: (650) 331-4537 

Richard J. Favretto

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP

1909 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006 

Attorneys for Defendant United Air Lines, Inc. 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

/s/

Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1870 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

T: (650) 461-5600 

F: (650) 461-5700 

Daryl A. Libow 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20006 

Attorneys for Defendant British Airways Plc 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

/s/

Harrison J. Frahn (SBN 206822) 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

2550 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

T: (650) 251-5000 

F: (650) 251-5002 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-04302-MJJ

Case 3:06-cv-04302-MJJ Document 6 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 3 of 6 Case 3:06-cv-04302-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/08/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Charles E. Koob (SBN 47349) 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

425 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10017 

Attorneys for Defendant Virgin Atlantic Airways

Limited

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), Shirish Gupta hereby attests 

that the signatories’ concurrences in the filing of this document have been obtained. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Date:

Honorable Judge Martin J. Jenkins 

-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-04302-MJJ

Case 3:06-cv-04302-MJJ Document 6 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 4 of 6

8/8/2006

Case 3:06-cv-04302-CRB Document 7 Filed 08/08/06 Page 4 of 4