Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00593/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00593-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERTA MUNDAY,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S- 04-0593 FCD/PAN

v. ORDER

PACIFIC BELL DIRECTORY, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

On December 9, 2005, plaintiff’s counsel, Roxanne R. Fritz, 

was ordered to pay sanctions in the amount of $300.00 and to show

cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to

prosecute. The court ordered counsel to pay the sanctions by

December 23, 2005 and to file her response to the Order to Show

Cause on or before January 6, 2006, and to appear at a hearing

set for January 13, 2006 at 10:00 a.m.

A review of the docket shows that Ms. Fritz neither paid the

ordered sanctions nor filed a response to the order to show

cause. 

Accordingly, the court makes the following orders:

1. The Order to Show Cause hearing set for January 13,

2006 is VACATED; and

Case 2:04-cv-00593-FCD-PAN Document 56 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiff's case is dismissed for failure to prosecute,

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), and for repeated failures to

respond to this court's orders, Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963

F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992). With respect to

dismissal for failure to follow court orders, the court

has reviewed the five factors set forth in Ferdik and

finds that each warrants dismissal of plaintiff's case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 11, 2006.

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00593-FCD-PAN Document 56 Filed 01/11/06 Page 2 of 2