Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_04-cv-00749/USCOURTS-almd-2_04-cv-00749-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

MELISSA A. HUNTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:04cv749-T

) (WO)

BARBOUR COUNTY, ALABAMA, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

For the reasons given by court on-the-record on August

4, 2005, it is ORDERED that defendants' motions to dismiss

(Doc. Nos. 5 and 21) and motion for summary judgment (Doc.

No. 36) are granted and denied as follows:

(1) Defendants Barbour County, Alabama and Barbour

County Commission are dismissed in their entirety.

(2) All three of plaintiff Melissa Hunter’s claims (for

sexual harassment, retaliation, and disparate treatment)

shall proceed under Title VII but only against defendant

Marshall Williams in his official capacity; otherwise

defendants in their various capacities are dismissed as

Case 2:04-cv-00749-MHT-VPM Document 96 Filed 08/05/05 Page 1 of 3
2

these claims to the extent the claims are brought under

Title VII.

(3) Plaintiff Hunter's harassment claim shall proceed

under § 1983 but only against defendant George Parham in his

individual capacity; otherwise defendants in their various

capacities are dismissed as this claim to the extent it is

brought under § 1983.

(4) Plaintiff Hunter's disparate-treatment claim shall

proceed under § 1983 but only against defendants Williams,

Parham, and Jean Hartzog in their individual capacities;

otherwise defendants in their official capacities are

dismissed as this claim to the extent it is brought under

§ 1983.

(5) Plaintiff Hunter's retaliation-transfer claim shall

proceed under § 1983 but only against defendants Parham and

Hartzog in their individual capacities; otherwise defendants

in their various capacities are dismissed as this claim to

the extent it is brought under § 1983.

Case 2:04-cv-00749-MHT-VPM Document 96 Filed 08/05/05 Page 2 of 3
(6) Plaintiff Hunter's retaliation-suspension claim

shall proceed under § 1983 but only against defendants

Williams, Parham, and Hartzog in their individual

capacities; otherwise defendants in their official

capacities are dismissed as this claim to the extent it is

brought under § 1983. 

DONE, this the 5th day of August, 2005.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:04-cv-00749-MHT-VPM Document 96 Filed 08/05/05 Page 3 of 3