Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00101/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00101-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

15cv101.o.grnt.stip cont MSC.In't Fruit.MCE.JLT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO 

CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

BARRY L. GOLDNER, SBN 107126

CHRISTOPHER E. DOMINGUEZ, SBN 193850

KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER,

COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP

4550 California Ave., Second Floor

Bakersfield, CA 93309

Telephone: 661-395-1000

Facsimile: 661-326-0418

Email: bgoldner@kleinlaw.com;

cdominguez@kleinlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants R.B. SANDRINI, INC., 

R.B. SANDRINI FARMS, L.P. d/b/a RB 

SANDRINI FARMS AND RICHARD B. 

SANDRINI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

R.B. SANDRINI, INC., R.B. SANDRINI 

FARMS, L.P. D/B/A RB SANDRINI FARMS, 

AND RICHARD B. SANDRINI,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-CV-00101-MCE-JLT

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT 

CONFERENCE

(Doc. 28)

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

This Stipulation to Continue the Settlement Conference in the above-referenced matter is 

made and entered into by and between defendants R.B. SANDRINI, INC., R.B. SANDRINI 

FARMS, L.P. D/B/A RB SANDRINI FARMS, AND RICHARD B. SANDRINI (“SANDRINI”), 

and plaintiff INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC (“IFG”), through their attorneys of 

record. 

///

Case 1:15-cv-00101-MCE-JLT Document 29 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

2

15cv101.o.grnt.stip cont MSC.In't Fruit.MCE.JLT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO 

CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

RECITALS

1. WHEREAS, the Settlement Conference in the above-entitled action is currently set 

for December 3, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6 at the Robert E. Coyle Federal Courthouse.

2. WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants is unavailable on the date currently scheduled 

for the Settlement Conference.

3. WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to continue the Settlement Conference to a 

future date.

4. WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred, and have agreed that they will be 

available to participate in a Settlement Conference during the first three weeks of January 2016, 

or the last two weeks of February 2016, to be scheduled at the Court’s convenience. 

STIPULATION

1. The current date scheduled for the Settlement Conference shall be vacated;

2. A new date for the Settlement Conference will be set for a date during the first 3 

weeks of January 2016, or the last two weeks of February 2016, at the Court’s convenience.

3. All deadlines associated with the Settlement Conference shall be extended to 

correspond with the new Settlement Conference date set by the Court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, through counsel of record.

Dated: November 11, 2015

By:

KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER

COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP

/s/ Barry L. Goldner

BARRY L. GOLDNER

Attorneys for Defendants R.B. SANDRINI, 

INC., R.B. SANDRINI FARMS, L.P. d/b/a 

RB SANDRINI FARMS AND RICHARD 

B. SANDRINI

Dated: November 11, 2015

By:

CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP

/s/ Richard C. O’Hare

RICHARD C. O’HARE

JOHN B. DAWSON

Attorneys for Plaintiff INTERNATIONAL 

FRUIT GENETICS, LLC

Case 1:15-cv-00101-MCE-JLT Document 29 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

3

15cv101.o.grnt.stip cont MSC.In't Fruit.MCE.JLT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO 

CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of counsel, the Court ORDERS:

1. The Settlement Conference for this Action is continued to January 7, 2016 at 9:30 

a.m. in Courtroom 6 at the Robert E. Coyle Courthouse in Fresno, California;

2. The Order re Settlement Conference (Doc. 26) applies to the continued settlement 

conference and the parties SHALL comply with it.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00101-MCE-JLT Document 29 Filed 11/16/15 Page 3 of 3