Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06827/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06827-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FEDERAL OVERTIME CLAIMS & RELATED DAMAGES

BETH W. MORA, CSB NO. 208859

COOPER & MORA

A Professional Corporation

18 Crow Canyon Court, Suite 145

San Ramon, California 94583

Telephone: (925) 820-8949

Facsimile: (925) 820-0278 

E-Mail: bmora@cooperlawoffice.com

Attorney for PLAINTIFFS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEANETTE EBERHART; HAMILTON BEAUX

O’KEADY-ELICOCK; HOWARD HILL; and, PHILIP

MARC ORLOW,

Plaintiff,

v.

FRYE CLAIMS CONSULTATION AND

ADMINISTRATION, INC., a California Corporation;

and DOES 1 through 25,

 

___________________________________________ Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 06-06827 MEJ

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS

WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’

FEDERAL OVERTIME CLAIMS &

RELATED DAMAGES

 

 

Whereas, following the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruling in Miller v.

Farmers Insurance Exchange on October 26, 2006, Plaintiffs formally request the Court grant their

proposed order to dismiss without prejudice the following portions of their complaint: 

1. “& Federal” from the Heading on page 1 of the Complaint;

2. “AND FEDERAL” from the caption in the Second Cause of action, page 10, line 2;

3. “, and under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §216 et. seq.,”, from the Second

Cause of action, page 10, lines 5 - 6;

4. “liquidated damages under said federal overtime wage laws;”; from the Second Cause of

Action, page 10, line 16, sub-section c; and, 

5. “and/or liquidated damages ......and federal.....” from the Prayer for Relief on page 14, line 11.

Case 3:06-cv-06827-MEJ Document 7 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FEDERAL OVERTIME CLAIMS & RELATED DAMAGES 2

(Said sections have been noted in a “Strike Through” Amended Complaint attached hereto as

Exhibit A.) 

Whereas, Plaintiffs’ counsel offered a Joint Stipulation to Defendant’s Counsel, which was rejected.

Therefore, Plaintiffs request that they are granted the right to file a First Amended Complaint absent

said sections, dismissed without prejudice within ten (10) days from execution of this Order. (Example of

an Amended Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit B.) 

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL

DATED: November 17, 2006

COOPER & MORA

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ 

BETH W. MORA

Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiffs shall file a First Amended Complaint consistent with this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________

By:________________________________________

U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Maria-Elena James

November 29, 2006

Case 3:06-cv-06827-MEJ Document 7 Filed 11/29/06 Page 2 of 2