Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02268/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02268-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

MICHAEL B. BIGELOW 

Attorney at Law - SBN 65211 

331 J Street, Suite 200 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 443-0217 

Email: LawOffice.mbigelow@gmail.com 

Attorney for Defendant 

Racardo Jackson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RACARDO JACKSON )

 )

 Petitioner ) 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) 

 ) 

WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA STATE ) 

PRISON, SOLANO )

 ) 

 Respondent ) 

 ) 

No. 14-cv-2268-MCE-EFB (TEMP) P

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE AMENDED FEDERAL 

PETITION AND MOTION TO STAY 

AND ABEY; ORDER 

Background 

By this Court’s previous Order a joint status report was filed on May 29, 2016. 

As set forth in detail in that report, this is not the “run of the mill” habeas case and raises 

myriad complicated issues. 

Petitioner had also indicated there that the he wishes to file an amended petition, and that 

is still his intent. As also set forth, petitioner intends to file a motion to stay and abey the federal 

petition pending exhaustion of certain federal claims not raised on appeal or by post conviction 

relief counsel. (The Court will recall that undersigned’s CJA appointment was expanded to 

include the preparation and filing of a state habeas corpus petition in an effort to exhaust federal 

constitutional claims.) 

It had been the intent of undersigned to complete all work on the state habeas petition by 

Case 2:14-cv-02268-MCE-DB Document 34 Filed 07/13/16 Page 1 of 3
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

this week, and that has been accomplished. But, undersigned has not been able to complete the 

proposed amended federal petition and motion to stay and abey as had been anticipated. In 

addition, and complicating matters, undersigned is leaving today to begin a 10-day, long standing 

family vacation. I will return the first week of July. 

The parties have met and conferred and respondent’s counsel has graciously agreed to 

permit petitioner additional time to file an amended petition for habeas corpus and a motion stay 

to abey the pending federal petition until such time as the federal claims are exhausted. 

Stipulation

For the above reasons, the parties stipulate that petitioner’s amended petition and motion 

to stay and abey may be filed on July 22, 2016. 

It is further stipulated that, in addition to the forgoing agreement with respect filing dates, 

the parties also agree that none of respondent’s defenses to the amended petition will be waived 

by this stipulation. Possible defense include, but are not limited to, respondent’s possible defense 

that one or more of petitioner’s federal claims, as may be set forth in the amended petition, are 

untimely and therefore time barred. Nor does this stipulation waive respondent’s right to object 

to petitioner’s motion to stay and abey the presently pending federal petition. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Dated: June 14, 2016 /S/MICHAEL B. BIGELOW 

Michael B. Bigelow 

Attorney for Petitioner 

Dated: June 14, 2016 /S/GREGORY OTT 

Greg Ott 

Attorney for Respondent 

Case 2:14-cv-02268-MCE-DB Document 34 Filed 07/13/16 Page 2 of 3
3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ORDER 

 IT IS ORDERED: that pursuant to agreement between the parties, the stipulation as set 

forth above is granted. 

Dated: July 13, 2016. 

 

 Hon. Edmund F. Brennan 

 U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:14-cv-02268-MCE-DB Document 34 Filed 07/13/16 Page 3 of 3