Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02870/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02870-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHIRLEY V. REMMERT,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 01-2870 MHP

ORDER DENYING

MOTION FOR

LEAVE 

Plaintiff has submitted a motion for leave to file an application for a pre-filing order

permitting her to file a motion for a temporary restraining order. An order was entered on August 15,

2001 ordering pre-filing review. Despite that order plaintiff has filed or attempted to file over forty

(40) actions in this court. Nearly all of these actions involve the same issues and relate to matters

pending before or conducted by the state court and over which this court has no jurisdiction. The

current attempt is no different. 

Plaintiff Shirley Remmert continues to complain of mistreatment of herself, her daughter

and, in this present effort, her mother. For all the reasons this court has set forth before, this court

lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims. Complaints about the state court and its personnel and

judges is properly addressed on appeal within the state court system. The motion made in this

action, which was dismissed long ago, is yet another sequence in the string of plaintiff’s vexatious

and frivolous litigation.. 

Case 3:01-cv-02870-MHP Document 18 Filed 01/04/11 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

This court has repeatedly advised plaintiff to cease filing actions in this court over which this

court has no jurisdiction and which merely are other versions of the same complaints that have been

previously dismissed or were barred by the pre-filing review order.

Plaintiff Shirley V. Remmert has abused the court system and has by her conduct since the

filing of the pre-filing review order demonstrated that she truly is a vexatious litigant. Therefore, the

motion for leave to file a motion to for a temporary restraining order is DENIED. The Clerk of

Court shall not file the motion and other accompanying papers. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: January 4, 2011 

MARILYN HALL PATEL

Judge, United States District Court

Northern District of California

Case 3:01-cv-02870-MHP Document 18 Filed 01/04/11 Page 2 of 2