Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05352/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05352-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 12:22 Securities Fraud

---

COOLEY GODWARD 

KRONISH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

768150 v1/PA 1. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

C 06-05352-JW 

COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP 

WILLIAM S. FREEMAN (82002) (freemanws@cooley.com) 

JOHN C. DWYER (136533) (dwyerjc@cooley.com) 

JAMES M. PENNING (229727) (jpenning@cooley.com) 

Five Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 

Telephone: (650) 843-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 857-0663 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

Actel Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IN RE ACTEL DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Case No. C 06-05352-JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE: TIME TO RESPOND TO

VERIFIED CONSOLIDATED

SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE

COMPLAINT 

WHEREAS, the Court previously ordered that defendants respond to the Verified 

Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint ("Complaint") in this action on or before 

February 20, 2008, and noted that there would be no further extensions of time with respect to 

such responses; 

WHEREAS, Defendants were prepared to file motions to dismiss the Complaint within 

the time ordered by the Court; 

WHEREAS, the parties to this Action have, within the last few days, reached a tentative 

oral agreement to settle this action, and anticipate that they will shortly reduce this agreement to a 

written Memorandum of Understanding, to be followed by a Stipulation of Settlement that will be 

submitted to the Court for approval; and 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge James Ware

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION 

IN PART; SETTING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case 5:06-cv-05352-JW Document 50 Filed 02/28/08 Page 1 of 5
COOLEY GODWARD 

KRONISH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

768150 v1/PA 2. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

C 06-05352-JW

WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid unnecessary expense to themselves and waste of the 

Court's resources that would result from proceeding with briefing and argument of the 

Defendants' anticipated motions to dismiss while they are reducing their tentative settlement 

agreement to writing; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE, 

subject to the Court's approval, as follows: 

1. Defendants' responses to the Complaint shall not be required to be filed by 

February 20, 2008. 

2. This matter shall be set for further status conference in approximately 90 days, at a 

date and time to be determined by the Court. 

3. As soon as practicable, and in any event prior to the status conference referenced 

in the preceding paragraph, the parties shall submit a formal Stipulation of Settlement for 

consideration by the Court. 

4. If for any reasons the parties' tentative settlement breaks down, the parties shall 

promptly notify the Court, and defendants' responses to the Complaint shall be filed within 10 

days of such notification. 

Dated: February 19, 2008 

// 

// 

// 

COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP 

WILLIAM S. FREEMAN (82002) 

JOHN C. DWYER (136533) 

JAMES M. PENNING (229727) 

 /s/ 

William S. Freeman (82002) 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

Actel Corporation 

Case 5:06-cv-05352-JW Document 50 Filed 02/28/08 Page 2 of 5
COOLEY GODWARD 

KRONISH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

768150 v1/PA 3. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

C 06-05352-JW

Dated: February 19, 2008 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

NINA F. LOCKER (123838) 

CAZ HASHEMI (210239) 

BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR (203244) 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 

 /s/ 

Bahram Seyedin-Noor (203244) 

Attorney for Individual Defendants 

JOHN C. EAST, ESMAT Z. HAMDY, PAUL V. 

INDACO, FARES N. MUBARAK, DENNIS G. 

KISH, DOUGLAS D. GOODYEAR, JEFFREY 

SCHLAGETER, DAVID M. SUGISHITA, 

DENNIS F. NYE, CARL N. BURROW, 

ROBERT J. SMITH, ROBERT G. SPENCER, 

JON A. ANDERSON, DAVID L. VAN DE 

HEY, BARBARA MCARTHUR, SUZANNE 

KINNER, MICHELLE BEGUN, ANTHONY 

FARINARO, AND JACOB JACOBSON 

Dated: February 19, 2008 

// 

// 

// 

GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

JONATHAN C. DICKEY (88226) 

1881 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125 

Telephone: (650) 849-5300 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 

 /s/ 

Jonathan C. Dickey (88226) 

Attorney for Individual Defendant 

HENRY L. PERRET 

Case 5:06-cv-05352-JW Document 50 Filed 02/28/08 Page 3 of 5
COOLEY GODWARD 

KRONISH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

768150 v1/PA 4. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

C 06-05352-JW

Dated: February 19, 2008 SCHIFFRIN BARROWAY TOPAZ & KESSLER, 

LLP 

ALAN R. PLUTZIK (077785) 

ROBERT M. BRAMSON (102006) 

L. TIMOTHY FISHER (191626) 

NICHOLE BROWNING 

2125 Oak Grove Road, Suite 120 

Walnut Creek, CA 94598 

Telephone: (925) 945-0770 

Facsimile: (925) 945-8792 

-andLEE D. RUDY 

J. DANIEL ALBERT 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

Telephone: (610) 667-7706 

Facsimile: (610) 667-7056 

 /s/ 

Alan R. Plutzik (077785) 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For good cause, and upon the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. Defendants' responses to the Complaint shall not be required to be filed by 

February 20, 2008. 

2. This matter shall be set for further status conference on _______________, 2008, 

at _____ _.m. 

3. As soon as practicable, and in any event prior to the status conference referenced 

in the preceding paragraph, the parties shall submit a formal Stipulation of Settlement for 

consideration by the Court. 

4. If for any reasons the parties' tentative settlement breaks down, the parties shall 

promptly notify the Court, and defendants' responses to the Complaint shall be filed within 10 

days of such notification. 

Dated: February __, 2008 

 HONORABLE JAMES WARE

March 31, 2008.

March 17 10 a.m

 The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement on or before March 10, 2008. 

Dated: February 27, 2008 ________________________________ 

 JAMES WARE 

 United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-05352-JW Document 50 Filed 02/28/08 Page 4 of 5
COOLEY GODWARD 

KRONISH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

768150 v1/PA 5. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

C 06-05352-JW

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that 

all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed Order]. 

Dated: February 19, 2008 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Jeffrey M. Kaban (235743) 

Case 5:06-cv-05352-JW Document 50 Filed 02/28/08 Page 5 of 5