Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02045/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02045-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAMONT A. HOUZE, II, No. 2:06-cv-2045-MCE-GGH-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

On October 6, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the September 28, 2006, order by the

magistrate judge. The court construes plaintiff objections as a request for reconsideration.

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does

not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed September 28, 2006, is

affirmed;

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-02045-MCE -GGH Document 7 Filed 11/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Within twenty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a complaint that

complies with the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of

Practice.

DATED: October 31, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-02045-MCE -GGH Document 7 Filed 11/01/06 Page 2 of 2