Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04156/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04156-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING & HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

MASTER FILE NO. C-04-4156-JW 

sf-2209982

MELVIN R. GOLDMAN (BAR NO. 34097) 

mgoldman@mofo.com 

JORDAN ETH (BAR NO. 121617) 

jeth@mofo.com 

MIA MAZZA (BAR NO. 184158) 

mmazza@mofo.com 

MARK FOSTER (BAR NO. 223682) 

mfoster@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

Attorneys for Defendants 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA 

CORP., ULRICH SCHUMACHER, PETER J. FISCHL, 

T. RUDD CORWIN, and HEINRICH FLORIAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re INFINEON TECHNONOGIES AG 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

________________________________________ 

This Document Relates To: 

 ALL ACTIONS. 

Master File No. C-04-4156-JW 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING 

SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING AND 

HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE 

SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS 

OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES 

LAWS 

 

Case 5:04-cv-04156-JW Document 128 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING & HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

MASTER FILE NO. C-04-4156-JW 

sf-2209982

1

The parties, through their respective counsel of record, submit the following Stipulation and 

[Proposed] Order: 

WHEREAS on September 11, 2006, the Court entered an Order granting defendants’ Motion 

for Partial Reconsideration of the Court’s May 22, 2006 Order, dismissing the Consolidated Amended 

Complaint, and granting plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the Order; 

WHEREAS on October 11, 2006, plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint for 

Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the “SAC”); 

WHEREAS defendants Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America 

Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, and Peter J. Fischl anticipate jointly filing a motion to dismiss the SAC 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6); 

WHEREAS, defendants Heinrich Florian and T. Rudd Corwin anticipate jointly filing a 

motion to dismiss the SAC pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6); 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed, subject to the approval of the Court, that plaintiffs may 

elect to file either a single 35-page opposition brief in response to defendants’ two motions to dismiss 

or two separate opposition briefs; and 

WHEREAS the parties have agreed that the schedule for briefing defendants’ anticipated 

motions to dismiss provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure should be adjusted in light of 

the complexity of the legal issues involved and the new allegations in the SAC; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2, 7-

4(b), and 7-12, that: 

1. Defendants shall file their motions to dismiss on or before November 17, 2006; 

2. Plaintiffs may elect to file either a single 35-page opposition brief in response to 

defendants’ two motions to dismiss or two separate opposition briefs, and shall file their opposition 

brief(s), if any, on or before December 29, 2006; 

3. Defendants shall file their reply briefs, if any, on or before January 22, 2006; 

4. The defendants’ motions to dismiss shall be noticed for hearing on February 26, 2007, 

at 9:00 a.m. 

Case 5:04-cv-04156-JW Document 128 Filed 10/25/06 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING & HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

MASTER FILE NO. C-04-4156-JW 

sf-2209982

2

DATED: October 23, 2006 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

MELVIN R. GOLDMAN 

JORDAN ETH 

MIA MAZZA 

MARK FOSTER 

By: /s/ Mia Mazza (e-filing signature) 

MIA MAZZA 

Attorneys for Defendants 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH 

AMERICA CORP., ULRIC SCHUMACHER, 

PETER J. FISCHL, T. RUDD CORWIN, and 

HEINRICH FLORIAN 

DATED: October 23, 2006 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

JOHN K. GRANT 

SYLVIA SUM 

By /s/ John K. Grant (e-filing signature) 

JOHN K. GRANT 

MURRAY, FRANK & SAILER LLP 

BRIAN P. MURRAY 

ERIC J. BELFI 

275 Madison Avenue, Suite 801 

New York, NY 10016 

Telephone: 212/682-1818 

212/682-1892 (fax) 

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 5:04-cv-04156-JW Document 128 Filed 10/25/06 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING & HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

MASTER FILE NO. C-04-4156-JW 

sf-2209982

ECF ATTESTATION

I, Mark Foster, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this: 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING 

AND HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES 

LAWS. 

In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Mia Mazza and John K. Grant 

have concurred in this filing. 

Dated: October 23, 2006 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Mark Foster [e-filing signature] 

Mark Foster 

Case 5:04-cv-04156-JW Document 128 Filed 10/25/06 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING & HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

MASTER FILE NO. C-04-4156-JW 

sf-2209982

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________, 2006 

_____________________________ 

The Honorable James Ware 

United State District Judge 

 10/25

Case 5:04-cv-04156-JW Document 128 Filed 10/25/06 Page 5 of 5