Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01044/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01044-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TODD W. AVARA, No. CIV S-04-1044 MCE DAD P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

WARDEN ADAMS, et al.,

Respondents.

_________________________/

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an

application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On March 24, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-01044-ALA Document 19 Filed 05/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Neither party has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 24, 2005,

are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner’s November 15, 2004 motion requesting a stay

is granted;

3. Petitioner is ordered to present all unexhausted claims

to the California Supreme Court in a state habeas corpus petition

to be filed within thirty days;

4. This action is stayed and the Clerk of the Court is

directed to administratively close the case;

5. Petitioner is ordered to file and serve a status report

in this case on the first court day of each month; and

6. Petitioner is ordered to file and serve a motion to lift

the stay of this action, along with a proposed amended petition

containing all of petitioner’s exhausted claims, within thirty

days after petitioner is served with the California Supreme

Court’s order disposing of petitioner’s state exhaustion

petition.

DATED: May 5, 2005

__________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01044-ALA Document 19 Filed 05/06/05 Page 2 of 2