Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06556/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06556-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOLLY LOUEN, ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

FRESNO POLICE OFFICER BRIAN )

TWEDT; THE CITY OF FRESNO, )

CALIFORNIA, )

 )

Defendants. )

)

) 

No. CV-F-04-6556 REC SMS

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION. 

(Doc. 98)

On April 28, 2006, Plaintiff filed a Request for

Clarification Re: Court’s Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for

Abstention Pending Resolution of Parallel State Court

Proceedings. Plaintiff asks whether changes in the timing of the

state court proceedings or this Court’s proceedings “could impact

the Court’s decision and permit plaintiff’s obtaining

reconsideration of the Court’s ruling, . . . .” Request for

Clarification 1. Plaintiff also asks whether the Court “intended

its decision on this matter to be final or provisional, . . . .” 

Id.

Case 1:04-cv-06556-OWW -SMS Document 99 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The Court has reviewed its order regarding abstention that

it issued April 19, 2006 (the “Order”). The Order appears to

unambiguously state the grounds for the Court’s decision on this

issue. The Court will not address the merits of a motion for

reconsideration in the absence of such a motion. See L.R. 78-

230(k). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 1, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

810ha4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06556-OWW -SMS Document 99 Filed 05/03/06 Page 2 of 2