Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01484/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01484-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Steven G. Rosales

Attorney at Law: 222224

Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing

12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115

Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670

Tel.: (562)868-5886

Fax: (562)868-5491

E-mail _steven.rosales@rohlfinglaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVEN R. CARLSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

STEVEN R. CARLSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:16-CV-01484 CKD

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

TO THE HONORABLE CAROLYN K. DELANEY, MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:

Plaintiff Steven R. Carlson (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), through their undersigned 

counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to extend 

the time for Plaintiff to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand 

to March 29, 2017; and that Defendant shall have until April 28, 2017, to file his 

opposition. Any reply by plaintiff will be due May 19, 2017. 

Case 2:16-cv-01484-CKD Document 18 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 3
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

As the Court is aware, after a 5 year battle with terminal stage 4 cancer 

Plaintiff’s Spouse passed away on September 30, 2016. The aftermath of this 

traumatic event on both Counsel and his 9 year old son and 7 year old daughter was 

immeasurable. Compounding the impact of this loss is the fact that Counsel’s 

spouse was a former employee at Counsel’s Law Firm and her death was far 

reaching in its impact on Counsel’s professional life as well. Due to the death, the 

subsequent holiday period, and the need to find a permanent caregiver and the 

required time to acclimate his children to that presence during his absence to meet 

his professional obligations, Counsel requires the additional time to prepare and 

file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand.

Counsel for plaintiff does not anticipate this extraordinary request for more 

time to become the rule and recognizes it is the extraordinary exception and 

sincerely apologizes to the court for any inconvenience this may have had upon it 

or its staff. 

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:16-cv-01484-CKD Document 18 Filed 03/10/17 Page 2 of 3
-3-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATE: March 8, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING

/s/ Steven G. Rosales

 BY: _________________________ 

 Steven G. Rosales

 Attorney for plaintiff

DATED: March 8, 2017 BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney 

*/S/- Sundeep Patel

_________________________________

Sundeep Patel 

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

[*Via email authorization]

 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff may have an extension of time, to and 

including March 29, 2017, in which to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment or Remand; Defendant may have an extension of time to April 28, 2017

to file his opposition, if any is forthcoming. Any reply by plaintiff will be due 

May 19, 2017. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2017

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-01484-CKD Document 18 Filed 03/10/17 Page 3 of 3