Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_16-cv-02408/USCOURTS-casd-3_16-cv-02408-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 20:1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination

---

1 

16cv2408-BTM (LL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KATHERINE PRESCOTT, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

RADY CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL – 

SAN DIEGO, 

Defendant.

 Case No.: 16cv2408-BTM (LL) 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT 

MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE 

ORDER WITH MODIFICATION 

[ECF No. 51] 

 On November 1, 2018, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the Court enter 

the parties’ Protective Order. ECF No. 51. The Court has considered the stipulated 

Protective Order and, for good cause shown, the joint motion is GRANTED with the 

following modification: 

 Paragraph 11 should read as follows: “Before any materials produced in discovery, 

answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admissions, deposition transcripts, or 

other documents which are designated as confidential information are filed with the Court 

for any purpose, the party seeking to file such material must seek permission of the Court 

by filing a motion requesting to file the material under seal. No document may be filed 

under seal (i.e., closed to inspection by the public) except pursuant to a Court order that 

authorizes the sealing of the particular document, or portions of it. A sealing order may 

Case 3:16-cv-02408-BTM-LL Document 52 Filed 11/06/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2 

16cv2408-BTM (LL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

issue only upon a showing that the information is privileged or protectable under the law. 

The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of the confidential or privileged 

material. To file a document under seal, the parties must comply with the procedures 

explained in Section 2.j of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and 

Procedures Manual for the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

California and Civil Local Rule 79.2. In addition, in accordance with Judge Lopez’s 

preferences, a party must file a ‘public’ version of any document that it seeks to file under 

seal. In the public version, the party may redact only that information that is deemed 

‘Confidential.’ The party should file the redacted document(s) simultaneously with a joint 

motion or ex parte application requesting that the confidential portions of the document(s) 

be filed under seal and setting forth good cause for the request.” 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 6, 2018 

Case 3:16-cv-02408-BTM-LL Document 52 Filed 11/06/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2