Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL MANRIQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

HUCHINS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00456-LJO-BAM PC

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS’

OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY

J U D G M E N T , D E C L A R A T I O N O F

DEFENDANT HACKER, AND STATEMENT

OF DISPUTED FACTS, AND RESPONSE AND

PLAINTIFF’S EVIDENTIARYOBJECTIONS TO

DEFENDANTS’ EVIDENCE, DECLARATION

IN SUPPORT, AND OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS

(ECF Nos. 202, 203, 204, 205, 216, 217, 218)

Plaintiff Daniel Manriquez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed

a motion for summary judgment, statement of undisputed facts, declaration in support of his motion,

and request for judicial notice. (ECF Nos. 191-194.) On June 14, 2012, Defendants filed an

opposition to the motion for summary judgment, declaration of Defendant Hacker, statement of

disputed facts, response to Plaintiff’s statement of undisputed facts, and objections to Plaintiff’s

motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 202-206.) On June 27, 2012, Defendants filed an

amended opposition to the motion for summary judgment, amended declaration of Defendant

Hacker, amended statement of disputed facts, and amended response to Plaintiff’s statement of

undisputed facts to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 209-212.) On July 9,

2012, Plaintiff filed evidentiary objections to Defendants’ evidence submitted in support of the

motion for summary judgment, a declaration in support of Plaintiff’s evidentiary objections, and an

1

Case 1:09-cv-00456-BAM Document 244 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

opposition to Defendant’s objections to the evidence submitted in support of the motion forsummary

judgment. (ECF Nos. 216-218.) After receiving an extension of time, on July 31, 2012, Plaintiff

filed a reply to opposition to the motion for summary judgment and objections to Defendants

amended evidence in support of Defendants’ opposition. (ECF Nos. 227, 228.) 

Based upon the filing of the amended documents, Defendants’ opposition to the motion for

summary judgment, declaration of Defendant Hacker, statement of disputed facts, and response, 

filed June 14, 2012, and Plaintiff’s evidentiary objections to Defendant’s evidence, declaration in

support, and opposition to Defendants’ objections, filed July 9, 2012, are HEREBY ORDERED

STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 31, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

cm411 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-00456-BAM Document 244 Filed 11/02/12 Page 2 of 2