Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00324/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00324-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD G. STINSON,

Petitioner,

 v.

BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, et al.,

Respondents. ______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. C 07-0324 MMC (PR)

ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Docket No. 8)

On January 18, 2007, petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the

above-titled petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a

2006 decision by the California Board of Prison Terms to revoke his parole. On February 26,

2007, petitioner wrote a letter informing the Court that the petition was the same as the

petition in an earlier-filed habeas action, Stinson v. Board of Prison Terms, et al., No. C 07-

0282 MMC (PR). On June 20, 2007, after reviewing the petitions filed in the two actions,

the Court concluded that the petitions were identical. Consequently, the Court dismissed the

instant action as duplicative of petitioner’s earlier action, and directed the Clerk of the Court

to close the file.

On August 8, 2007, petitioner filed in the above-titled action a document titled

“Notice of Motion Summary Judgment with Undisputed Facts.” Because this action is

closed, the motion is hereby STRICKEN. All documents concerning the claims petitioner

raised in the above-titled action must be filed by petitioner in Case No. 07-0282, the only

Case 3:07-cv-00324-MMC Document 10 Filed 11/08/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The Court notes that petitioner has filed a motion for summary judgment, and a

traverse, in Case No. C 07-0282.

2

action in which those claims are pending.1 

This order terminates Docket No. 8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 8, 2007 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-00324-MMC Document 10 Filed 11/08/07 Page 2 of 2