Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02921/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02921-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

-1-

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BIGELOW TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KEVIN J. DEHOFF, ESQ., SB No. 252106

 Email: kdehoff@akk-law.com

AMIE MCTAVISH, ESQ., SB No. 242372

 Email: amctavish@akk-law.com

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

Attorneys at Law

601 University Avenue, Suite 150

Sacramento, CA 95825

Telephone: (916) 564-6100

Telecopier: (916) 564-6263

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF YOLO (also sued erroneously herein as YOLO 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT and YOLO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT), 

L. GARCIA, J. CEJA, J. LAZARO, M. NEVIS, and V. BIGELOW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THERESA MARIE NIESEN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

L. GARCIA, YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPUTY; J. CEJA, YOLO COUNTY 

SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; J. LAZARO, YOLO 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; M. NEVIS, 

YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; 

OFFICER BIGELOW, ANIMAL CONTROL 

OFFICER FOR YOLO COUNTY; YOLO 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; 

YOLO COUNTY PROBATION 

DEPARTMENT, and Does 1 through 50, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:14-cv-02921-WBS-DAD

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT BIGELOW TO RESPOND 

TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

WHEREAS Defendants COUNTY OF YOLO (also sued erroneously herein as YOLO 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT and YOLO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT), 

L. GARCIA, J. CEJA, J. LAZARO, and M. NEVIS responded to the complaint by filing a 

motion to dismiss, which is set to be heard on April 20, 2015.

///

Case 2:14-cv-02921-WBS-DB Document 11 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 3
-2-

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BIGELOW TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS Defendant V. BIGELOW was served with the complaint after the other 

Defendants and thus is not a party to the motion.

WHEREAS Defendant V. BIGELOW’S response date to the complaint is April 16, 2015.

WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel has agreed to give Defendant BIGELOW a response time 

to the complaint that is contemporaneous with the other Defendants and based upon the Court’s 

ruling on the motion to dismiss. 

WHEREAS this is the parties’ first request for an extension.

THE PARTIES THEREFORE, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE 

ATTORNEYS OF RECORD MAKE THE FOLLOWING STIPULATED REQUEST:

1. If the motion to dismiss is denied, Defendant BIGELOW will respond 

concurrently with the other Defendants in the same answer within the statutory time period after 

a denial of the motion.

2. If the motion to dismiss is granted, Defendant BIGELOW will respond to any 

amended complaint simultaneously with the other Defendants. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2015

Dated: April 10, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF JULIA M. YOUNG

 /s/ Julia M. Young

 [as authorized on 4/10/15]

By:_________________________________

JULIA M. YOUNG

Attorney for Plaintiff THERESA MARIE 

NIESEN

Case 2:14-cv-02921-WBS-DB Document 11 Filed 04/15/15 Page 2 of 3
-3-

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT BIGELOW TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: April 14, 2015 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

 /s/ Kevin J. Dehoff

By:_________________________________

KEVIN J. DEHOFF

AMIE McTAVISH

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF 

YOLO, L. GARCIA, J. CEJA, J. 

LAZARO, M. NEVIS, and V. 

BIGELOW

Case 2:14-cv-02921-WBS-DB Document 11 Filed 04/15/15 Page 3 of 3