Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00508/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00508-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LISA BELYEW, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

KORY L. HONEA, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:17-cv-0508 KJM AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a former pretrial detainee and current state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed 

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On March 30, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 

served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. ECF No. 26. Plaintiff has not filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 

602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 

de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 

by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 

///// 

Case 2:17-cv-00508-KJM-AC Document 31 Filed 06/04/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 30, 2020 (ECF No. 26), are adopted in 

full; 

 2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Honea are dismissed without leave to amend; and 

3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 

proceedings. 

DATED: June 3, 2020. 

Case 2:17-cv-00508-KJM-AC Document 31 Filed 06/04/20 Page 2 of 2