Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04065/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04065-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:13-cv-04065-VC

955374

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

RACHAEL E. MENY - # 178514

rmeny@kvn.com

R. JAMES SLAUGHTER - # 192813

rslaughter@kvn.com

MICHELLE YBARRA - # 260697

mybarra@kvn.com

ALEXANDER DRYER - # 291625

adryer@kvn.com

633 Battery Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-1809

Telephone: 415 391 5400 

Facsimile: 415 397 7188

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

THOMAS M. MCINERNEY - # 162055

tmm@ogletreedeakins.com

CHRISTOPHER M. AHEARN - # 239089

chris.ahearn@ogletreedeakins.com

Steuart Tower, Suite 1300

One Market Plaza

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: 415 442 4810

Facsimile: 415 442 4870

Attorneys for Defendant 

LYFT, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK COTTER and ALEJANDRA 

MACIEL, on behalf of themselves and all 

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LYFT, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:13-cv-04065-VC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING CLASS 

CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria

Date Filed: September 3, 2013

Trial Date: None Set

Case 3:13-cv-04065-VC Document 136 Filed 06/16/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:13-cv-04065-VC

955374

The undersigned parties, by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate1:

WHEREAS, on April 9, 2015, the Court issued the Amended Case Management Order 

(Dkt. 110) requiring all discovery relating to class certification to be completed by no later than 

September 24, 2015;

WHEREAS, the Court set the hearing for plaintiffs’ anticipated motion for class 

certification for December 17, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.;

WHEREAS, the Court ordered the parties to confer and submit a stipulated proposed 

briefing schedule in which the plaintiffs’ reply brief is filed no later than two weeks before the 

hearing;

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and jointly request that the Court enter the 

following order:

Plaintiffs shall file their Motion for Class Certification on October 8, 2015;

Defendant shall file its Opposition to the Motion for Class Certification on November 17, 

2015; and

Plaintiffs shall file their Reply in Support of the Motion for Class Certification on 

December 3, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 12, 2015

By:

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

/s/ Michelle Ybarra

RACHAEL E. MENY

R. JAMES SLAUGHTER

MICHELLE YBARRA

ALEXANDER DRYER

Attorneys for Defendant 

LYFT, INC.

 1 As discussed at the hearing held on June 4, 2015, Plaintiffs may renew their request for an 

accelerated hearing and briefing schedule on their motion for class certification if the Price v. Lyft

case is not stayed by the state court. Plaintiffs have agreed to this schedule on the assumption that 

the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in this case will remain December 17, 

2015.

Case 3:13-cv-04065-VC Document 136 Filed 06/16/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:13-cv-04065-VC

955374

Dated: June 12, 2015

By:

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK 

& STEWART, P.C.

/s/ Thomas M. McInerney

THOMAS M. MCINERNEY

CHRISTOPHER M. AHEARN

Attorneys for Defendant 

LYFT, INC.

Dated: June 12, 2015

By:

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

PATRICK COTTER and ALEJANDRA 

MACIEL, on behalf of themselves and all 

others similarly situated

Dated: June 12, 2015

By:

CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES

/s/ Matthew D. Carlson

MATTHEW D. CARLSON

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

PATRICK COTTER and ALEJANDRA 

MACIEL, on behalf of themselves and all 

others similarly situated

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________ _____________________________________

HONORABLE VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

June 16, 2015

Case 3:13-cv-04065-VC Document 136 Filed 06/16/15 Page 3 of 3