Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01234/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01234-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD KUNKEL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1234 MCE KJM PS

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF TRANSPORTATION, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed November 6, 2006, plaintiff's second amended complaint was

dismissed and thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. The thirty day

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint or otherwise

responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:06-cv-01234-MCE -KJM Document 23 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 19, 2007. 

kunkel1234.fta

Case 2:06-cv-01234-MCE -KJM Document 23 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 2