Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02905/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02905-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 230
Nature of Suit: Rent, Lease, Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MP APW LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

 EDWARD MADRIGAL, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-2905 KJM CKD PS 

ORDER 

 Defendants, proceeding pro se, removed the above-entitled action from state court. The 

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

 On January 8, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 

served on defendants and which contained notice to defendants that any objections to the findings 

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have not filed objections 

to the findings and recommendations. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 

the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

the proper analysis. 

///// 

Case 2:14-cv-02905-KJM-CKD Document 8 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 8, 2015 are adopted in full; and 

 2. The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, 

County of Sacramento. 

DATED: February 6, 2015 

Case 2:14-cv-02905-KJM-CKD Document 8 Filed 02/06/15 Page 2 of 2