Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-00886/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-00886-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRANCISCO J. FIMBRES, LOREN 

MENDEZ, individuals 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CHAPEL MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 

CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY, SAXON 

MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., HSBC 

MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., DEUTSCHE 

BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as 

trustee for IXIS 2006-HE2, its successors and/or

assigns, & DOES 1 through 20 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 09cv0886 IEG POR 

 ORDER: 

 (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION 

 FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO 

 FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 

 PROCEDURE 41(a) (Doc. No. 19); and 

 (2) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT 

 HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES’S 

 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

 PLEADINGS (Doc. No. 9) 

 Presently before the Court are: (1) the joint motion by FRANCISCO J. FIMBRES and 

LOREN MENDEZ (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. (“HSBC”) 

to dismiss the action against HSBC with prejudice (Doc. No. 19); and (2) HSBC’s motion for 

judgment on the pleadings. (Doc. No. 9.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants the joint 

motion and denies the motion for judgment on the pleadings as moot. 

 Plaintiffs and HSBC, through their respective counsel, have filed a joint motion stipulating as 

follows: 

 1. On or about April 28, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a complaint against Defendant in the 

United States District Court for the Southern District of California, entitled Francisco J. Fimbres 

and Loren Mendez v. Chapel Mortgage Corp., et al., Case No. 09cv0886-IEG-POR (the “Action”). 

Case 3:09-cv-00886-IEG-POR Document 20 Filed 09/23/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 2. On or about May 6, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint in the Action. 

 3. On or about July 13, 2009, HSBC filed an Answer to the First Amended Complaint 

specifically denying Plaintiff’s causes of action, and asserting nine affirmative defenses. 

 4. The parties have entered into a settlement agreement and desire that the Action be 

dismissed with prejudice only as against HSBC. 

 5. The parties agree that each party shall bear their/its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 In accordance with the parties’ stipulated agreement, and good cause appearing, the Court 

GRANTS the joint motion. This action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to defendant 

HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., with each party to bear their/its own attorneys’ fees and 

costs. In light of HSBC’s dismissal, its motion for the judgment on the pleadings is DENIED AS 

MOOT, and the hearing on the motion, currently set for Monday September 28, 2009, is hereby 

VACATED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 23, 2009 _________________________________________ 

IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

______________________________________

IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:09-cv-00886-IEG-POR Document 20 Filed 09/23/09 Page 2 of 2