Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01615/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01615-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN VLASICH, 1:05-cv-01615-LJO-GSA-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS &

Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 23)

vs. ORDER FOR THIS ACTION TO PROCEED 

AGAINST DEFENDANTS FISHBACK, JUAREZ, 

DR. TIMOTHY FISHBACK, et al., AND VILLA FOR VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH

AMENDMENT, AND DISMISSING OTHER

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANT CDCR

Defendants.

_____________________________/

Steven Vlasich (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

 On September 5, 2007, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending

that this action proceed against defendants Fishback, Juarez, and Villa for violation of the Eighth

Amendment, and recommending dismissal of other claims and defendant CDCR. Plaintiff was

provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. 

To date, plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and

recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-

305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

Case 1:05-cv-01615-LJO -GSA Document 28 Filed 11/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on

September 5, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. This action now proceeds on plaintiff’s complaint, filed December 20, 2005,

against defendants Fishback, Juarez, and Villa on plaintiff’s Eighth

Amendment medical care claim;

3. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim against CDCR, and due process, ADA,

RA, and state law tort claims are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted; and

4. Defendant CDCR. is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted against it.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 4, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01615-LJO -GSA Document 28 Filed 11/05/07 Page 2 of 2