Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-90-06351/USCOURTS-ca10-90-06351-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

. ~ 

FI LED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

A. R 1 7 1991 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

JOHN FRANCIS ROURKE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

SAME. CRAVEN, RODNEY SHARP, 

and RAY BUNTROCK, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 90-6351 

(D.C. No. CIV-90-909-T) 

(W.D. Oklahoma) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before LOGAN, MOORE, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34. 1. 9. The cause is therefore ordered 

submitted without oral argument. 

John Francis Rourke appeals from the district court's 

dismissal of his action against several prison officials under 

*This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Appellate Case: 90-6351 Document: 010110034218 Date Filed: 04/17/1991 Page: 1 
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 

403 U.S. 388 (1971). Specifically, Mr. Rourke alleges that these 

officials verbally and physically assaulted him at various times 

during the fall of 1989 and the winter of 1990. The district 

court dismissed Mr. Rourke's claims due to his failure to exhaust 

administrative remedies. 

After reviewing the record, we conclude the district court 

committed no reversible error, and on the basis of the reasoning 

set forth in its Order of September 25, 1990, and on the basis of 

our reasoning in the related case of Rourke v. Beeler, No. 

90-6353, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See 

McCarthy v. Maddiqan, 914 F.2d 1411, 1412 (10th Cir. 1990); 

Brice v. Day, 604 F.2d 664, 666-68 (10th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 

444 U.S. 1086 (1980). The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

Entered for the Court 

John P. Moore 

Circuit Judge 

-2-

Appellate Case: 90-6351 Document: 010110034218 Date Filed: 04/17/1991 Page: 2