Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00231/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00231-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARREN CLEVELAND,

Plaintiff,

v.

GROCERYWORKS.COM, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-00231-JCS 

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT'S 

OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE

Re: Dkt. No. 89

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (dkt. 71) is currently pending before the Court. 

On April 27, 2016, Defendant filed its reply (dkt. 88) and a separate, twenty-nine-page 

compilation of objections (dkt. 89) to evidence submitted with Plaintiff’s opposition. This Court’s 

local rules provide that “[a]ny evidentiary and procedural objections to the opposition must be 

contained within the reply brief or memorandum.” Civ. L.R. 7-3(c). Defendant’s separate 

objections are therefore STRICKEN and will not be considered in the Court’s ruling on the 

pending motion.

The page limit for a reply brief is fifteen pages. Civ. L.R. 7-3(c), 7-4(b). Defendant’s 

reply is ten pages long—five pages under the limit. The Court therefore grants Defendant leave to

file narrowly tailored objections to evidence, formatted in a manner consistent with this Court’s 

rules and not exceeding five pages, no later than May 27, 2016. Defendant’s revised objections 

may not rely on or incorporate by reference the objections stricken by this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2016

______________________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

Chief Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-00231-JCS Document 90 Filed 05/18/16 Page 1 of 1