Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01371/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01371-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VIOLET RAMIREZ, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:07-cv-01371-OWW-SMS

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 7)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Violet Ramirez (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se with an action for damages and other relief

concerning alleged civil rights violations. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304.

On December 11, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and a Recommendation herein which were served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

//

Case 1:07-cv-01371-OWW -SMS Document 8 Filed 01/23/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed December 11,

2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, pursuant to

Local Rule 11-110 for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the

Court’s order of October 17, 2007, and for the reason(s) set

forth therein, namely, for failure to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01371-OWW -SMS Document 8 Filed 01/23/08 Page 2 of 2