Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02281/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02281-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOTAL RECALL TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

 v.

PALMER LUCKEY and OCULUS VR,

LLC, as successor-in-interest to Oculus

VR, Inc.,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-02281 WHA

ORDER REFERRING FURTHER

DISCOVERY DISPUTES

TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

We have already had four discovery disputes in this matter, and now there are two more

pending. The two further motions for discovery relief relating to transcripts from the Zenimax

case, unlogged redactions, and privilege assertions over communications between Igra and Seidl

are hereby REFERRED to a magistrate judge for assignment at random by the Clerk of Court. It

is the responsibility of counsel to make sure these issues are pursued before the magistrate

judge in a timely manner and in accordance with that judge’s procedure. All future discovery

problems are likewise referred to the magistrate judge. The Court does not intend to extend the

discovery deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 4, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-02281-WHA Document 126 Filed 04/04/16 Page 1 of 1