Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04387/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04387-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

3074780_1.DOC 

1 JEROME F. BIRN, JR., State Bar No. 128561 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LLOYD WINAWER, State Bar No. 157823 

NICOLE M. HEALY, State Bar No. 157417 

MERAV A. MAGEN, State Bar No. 236144 

CHRISTOPHER R. HOWALD, State Bar No. 243598 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Email: chowald@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC., 

KONG YEU HAN, PAUL JEI-ZEN SONG, 

MICHAEL D. McDONALD, THOMAS C. 

DOCZY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, 

INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE 

LITIGATION, 

Master File No. C-06-04387 RMW 

STIPULATION AND 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL MATTERS 

 

STIPULATION AND SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C-06-04387 

*E-FILED - 3/14/07*

Case 5:06-cv-04387-RMW Document 31 Filed 03/14/07 Page 1 of 5
-1- 3074780_1.DOC 

WHEREAS, this is a consolidated shareholder derivative action brought on behalf of 

Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. (“ISSI”) against certain officers and directors of ISSI; 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint in 

the instant action on November 27, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the deadline for Defendants’ responses to the Consolidated Shareholder 

Complaint was extended by stipulation and order to March 14, 2007; 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding the scheduling of the 

Defendants’ responses to the Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, subject 

to the approval of the Court, that the Defendants shall have an additional sixty (60) days to file 

their response to the Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint; and 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendants’ responses to the 

Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint currently on file with the Court shall be filed on 

or before May 14, 2007; Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to any motions filed by the Defendants shall be 

filed on or before June 12, 2007; and Defendants’ reply briefs shall be filed on or before July 13, 

2007. 

Dated: March 9, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

 s/ Nicole M. Healy 

Nicole M. Healy 

 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Kong Yeu 

Han, Paul Jei-Zen Song, Michael D. 

McDonald, Thomas C. Doczy 

Dated: March 9, 2007 BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & 

BIRKHAEUSER, LLP 

 s/ Alan R. Plutzik 

 Alan R. Plutzik 

 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

STIPULATION AND SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C-06-04387 

Case 5:06-cv-04387-RMW Document 31 Filed 03/14/07 Page 2 of 5
-2- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: March 9, 2007 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 s/ William H. Kimball 

William H. Kimball 

 

Attorneys for Defendant Jimmy S.M. Lee 

Dated: March 9, 2007 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP 

 s/ William S. Freeman 

William S. Freeman 

 Attorneys for Defendant Gary L. Fischer 

Dated: March 9, 2007 BERGESON, LLP

 s/ Daniel J. Bergeson 

Daniel J. Bergeson Attorneys for Defendant Lip-Bu Tan 

Dated: March 9, 2007 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

AND DORR 

 s/ Mark D. Flanagan 

Mark D. Flanagan Attorneys for Defendant Hide Tanigami 

STIPULATION AND SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C-06-04387 

Case 5:06-cv-04387-RMW Document 31 Filed 03/14/07 Page 3 of 5
 -3- 3074780_1.DOC 

 1 ORDER 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the Defendants shall have an 

additional sixty (60) days to file their response to the Consolidated Shareholder Derivative 

Complaint. 

Defendants’ response to the Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint shall be filed 

on or before May 14, 2007; 

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to any motions filed by the Defendants shall be filed on or before 

June 12, 2007; and 

Defendants’ reply briefs shall be filed on or before July 13, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

_______________________________ 

 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

STIPULATION AND SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C-06-04387 

DATE: 3/14/07

Case 5:06-cv-04387-RMW Document 31 Filed 03/14/07 Page 4 of 5
 -4- 3074780_1.DOC 

1 ECF CERTIFICATION

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

I, Christopher R. Howald, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being 

used to file this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order. In compliance with General 

Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that all parties have concurred in this filing. 

Dated: March 9, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: s/ Christopher R. Howald 

Christopher R. Howald 

STIPULATION AND SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C-06- 04387 

Case 5:06-cv-04387-RMW Document 31 Filed 03/14/07 Page 5 of 5