Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-00532/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-00532-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1

Case No. 16-CV-00532-RMW; Case No. 14-CV-01117-LHK

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RELATE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GARY MINOR,

Plaintiff,

v.

FEDEX OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES, 

INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-CV-00532-RMW

Case No. 14-CV-01117-LHK

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

RELATE

Re: Dkt. No. 361

Before the Court is an administrative motion to consider whether Minor v. FedEx Office & 

Print Services, et al., No. 16-CV-00532-RMW (the “2015 Action”),2should be related to Minor v.

FedEx Office & Print Services, et al., No. 14-CV-01117-LHK (the “2013 Action”).3 ECF No. 36. 

The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. The Court hereby GRANTS 

the motion to relate the 2015 Action to the 2013 Action.

 The 2015 Action shall be reassigned to the undersigned judge. All future filings are to 

 

1 All docket citations in this Order refer to Case No. 14-CV-01117-LHK unless otherwise noted. 

2

The 2015 Action was filed in Santa Clara Superior Court on December 27, 2015. The case was 

removed to federal court on February 1, 2016. No. 16-CV-00532-RMW, ECF Nos. 1 & 6. 

3

The 2013 Action was filed in Santa Clara Superior Court on February 8, 2013. The case was 

removed to federal court on March 10, 2014. ECF No. 1. 

Case 5:16-cv-00532-LHK Document 24 Filed 02/24/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 16-CV-00532-RMW; Case No. 14-CV-01117-LHK

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RELATE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

bear the initials “LHK.” Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are 

vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines 

set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management 

order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the 

newly assigned judge. A copy of this Order shall be filed in the docket of both the 2015 and 2013 

Actions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 24, 2016

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:16-cv-00532-LHK Document 24 Filed 02/24/16 Page 2 of 2