Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05681/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05681-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

GOODIN, MAC

BRIDE, SQUERI, DAY 

&

LAMPREY, LLP

ATTORNEYS 

AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 

Case No. C 06-05681 JCS

GOODIN, MACBRIDE, SQUERI, DAY & LAMPREY, LLP 

ROBERT A. GOODIN, State Bar No. 061302 

FRANCINE T. RADFORD, State Bar No. 168269 

KEITH E. JOHNSON, State Bar No. 202321 

505 Sansome Street, Suite 900 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 392-7900 

Facsimile: (415) 398-4321 

LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM D. ROSS 

A Professional Corporation 

WILLIAM D. ROSS, State Bar No. 64538 

520 South Grand Avenue, Suite 300 

Los Angeles, California 90071-2610 

Telephone: (213) 892-1592 

Facsimile: (213) 892-1519 

Attorneys for Defendants City of American Canyon, and 

Robert Weil in his official capacity as Director of Public Works of 

the City of American Canyon 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DR. PAUL MAGUIRE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON, ET AL., 

Defendants. 

No. C 06-05681 JCS 

[Assigned to the Honorable Joseph C. 

Spero, Magistrate] 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

BRIEFING DEADLINES ON 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REOPEN 

CASE AND FOR AWARD OF 

ATTORNEY’S FEES; AND PROPOSED 

ORDER 

Case 3:06-cv-05681-JCS Document 77 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:06-cv-05681-JCS Document 79 Filed 10/10/07 Page 1 of 3
GOODIN, MAC

BRIDE, SQUERI, DAY 

&

LAMPREY, LLP

ATTORNEYS 

AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 

-1- Case No. C 06-05681 JCS

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Dr. Paul Maguire and defendants City of 

American Canyon and Robert Weil, in his capacity as the Director of Public Works for the City 

of American Canyon, have stipulated to a two-week extension of Defendants’ briefing deadline 

on Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen Case and for Award of Attorney’s Fees to permit the parties to 

explore resolution without incurring the burden and expense of further motion practice, as set 

forth herein, and hereby request the Court to grant continue that extension accordingly. 

1. Reason for extension. 

Plaintiff filed his Notice of Motion and Motion to Reopen Case and for Award of 

Attorney’s Fees on September 26, 2007 (“the Motion”). He set the hearing for 9:30 a.m. on 

November 2, 2007, before this Court. Consequently, Defendants’ deadline to file their opposition 

to the Motion is October 12, 2007, and Plaintiff’s deadline to file his reply is October 19, 2007. 

On September 30, 2007, the Court issued notice that the hearing had been 

continued until January 25, 2008, but ordered that the briefing deadlines would remain the same. 

Since then, the parties in good faith decided to explore a resolution of the Motion 

to avoid the burden and expense of engaging in full-blown motion practice. To do so, however, 

Defendants asked, and Plaintiff agreed, to extend the opposition deadline by two weeks to Friday, 

October 26, 2007, with Plaintiff’s reply deadline to fall on Friday, November 2, 2007, assuming

the Court approved the Stipulation. 

2. Two previous time modifications. 

Discovery and trial of this matter were completed on an expedited basis. There 

were only two previous time modifications, including a request for a one-week hearing

continuance to accommodate counsel’s surgical recovery schedule. 

3. Effect of the extension. 

The extension would delay Defendants’ filing deadline two weeks (with Plaintiff’s 

reply deadline falling the following week). But because the hearing is not scheduled until 

January 25, 2008, this extension presumably would not interfere with the Court’s preparation for 

the hearing. 

/// 

Case 3:06-cv-05681-JCS Document 77 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:06-cv-05681-JCS Document 79 Filed 10/10/07 Page 2 of 3
GOODIN, MAC

BRIDE, SQUERI, DAY 

&

LAMPREY, LLP

ATTORNEYS 

AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 

-2- No. C 06-05681 JCS

Dated: October 5, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

GOODIN, MACBRIDE, SQUERI, 

DAY & LAMPREY, LLP 

By /s/Keith E. Johnson 

 Keith E. Johnson 

 Attorneys for Defendants City of American 

 Canyon, and Robert Weil in his official 

 capacity as Director of Public Works of the 

 City of American Canyon 

Dated: October 4, 2007 By /s/Arlo Hale Smith 

 Arlo Hale Smith 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 Dr. Paul Maguire 

Filer’s Attestation: I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures 

indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________ ___________________________________ 

 JOSEPH C. SPERO 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

3086/002/X93175.v1 

Case 3:06-cv-05681-JCS Document 77 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 3 of 3

10/09/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:06-cv-05681-JCS Document 79 Filed 10/10/07 Page 3 of 3