Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04086/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04086-39/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

PIOTR J. GARDIAS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant.

 /

No. C04-04086 HRL

Consolidated With: C04-04768 HRL

C05-01242 HRL

C05-01833 HRL

C06-04695 HRL

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

[Docket No. 288]

On September 10, 2007, plaintiff filed a document entitled “Motion to Compel, Request

for Ruling that Cain-Simon committed fraud.” It is not entirely clear what relief plaintiff seeks

by this motion. However, he says that, before this court granted his motion to quash, several of

his health care providers produced documents in response to defendant’s various subpoenas for

his medical records. He seems to assert that Cain-Simon “committed fraud” because she failed

to advise the court of this fact at the hearing on his motion to quash. Plaintiff also insists that he

has not waived all claims concerning his health.

Plaintiff appears to be upset that his health care providers responded to defendant’s

subpoenas before the court had a chance to rule on his motion to quash. But the court finds no

grounds on the record presented to conclude that defense counsel perpetrated a fraud.

*E-FILED: 10/3/2007*

Case 5:04-cv-04086-HRL Document 306 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Moreover, at the motion hearing on plaintiff’s motion to quash, in an effort to convince this

court that defendant was not entitled to any discovery of his medical records, plaintiff

disclaimed any intent to inject issues concerning his health or medical condition in this lawsuit. 

He also confirmed that his lawsuits concerned only alleged discrimination based on his age and

national origin. As such, the court agreed that defendant’s requested discovery was irrelevant. 

Plaintiff’s instant motion to compel is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

October 3, 2007

Case 5:04-cv-04086-HRL Document 306 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

A copy of this document will be mailed to:

Piotr J. Gardias 

72 Floyd Street

San Jose, CA 95110 

Plaintiff (Pro Se)

Notice has been electronically mailed to: 

Mary Susan Cain-Simon Mary.CainSimon@doj.ca.gov, David.Moss@doj.ca.gov 

Fiel D. Tigno fiel.tigno@doj.ca.gov 

Case 5:04-cv-04086-HRL Document 306 Filed 10/03/07 Page 3 of 3