Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02774/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02774-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFS. TO RESPOND TO PLS.’ COMPLAINT

Case No. 07-CV-2774 (JF)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

David J. Miclean (CSB# 115098/miclean@fr.com)

Christina D. Jordan (CSB# 245944/cjordan@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello St., Suite 500

Redwood City, CA 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Attorneys for Defendants

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK OF

AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND

OPERATIONS, INC.

Robert A. Spanner, Esq. (CSB# 60308/ras@techtriallaw.com)

TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

545 Middlefield Road, Suite 220

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 324-2223

Facsimile: (650) 324-0178

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN JOSE DIVISION)

IP SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a National

Banking Association Member; BANK OF

AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND

OPERATIONS, INC., a Delaware

corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. 07-CV-2774 (JF)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH

DEFENDANTS MAY RESPOND TO

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

TO THE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES, AND TO THE PARTIES’ ATTORNEYS OF

RECORD:

**E-filed 7/16/07** ---------------

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 10 Filed 07/16/07 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFS. TO RESPOND TO PLS.’ COMPLAINT

Case No. 07-CV-2774 (JF)

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, IP SOLUTIONS,

INC. (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK OF AMERICA

TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONS, INC. (“Defendants”), that Defendants be granted an

additional fifteen (15) days in which to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint in the above-captioned

matter.

Based on this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order, the date by which Defendants must respond

to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended to Friday, July 27, 2007.

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and

Defendants that the time period for noticing a motion filed in response to the Complaint for hearing

pursuant to Local Rule 7-2 shall be extended to forty-two (42) days after service of the motion.

This Stipulation is not entered into for purposes of delay, and will not alter the date of any

event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. By entering into this stipulation, neither

Plaintiffs nor Defendants waive any rights, claims or defenses they may have in this action.

The Stipulation may be executed in counterparts and by facsimile signature, each of which,

when executed, shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same

stipulation. This Stipulation contains the entire agreement among the parties. The undersigned

hereby consent to the terms set forth in the foregoing Stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

Dated: July 9, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ David J. Miclean

David J. Miclean

Attorneys for Defendants

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK OF

AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND

OPERATIONS, INC.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 10 Filed 07/16/07 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFS. TO RESPOND TO PLS.’ COMPLAINT

Case No. 07-CV-2774 (JF)

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: July 9, 2007 TRIAL AND TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

By: /s/ Robert A. Spanner

Robert A. Spanner

Attorney for Plaintiff

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________,2007 _______________________________________

HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL

JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

50424977.doc

7/16/07

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 10 Filed 07/16/07 Page 3 of 3