Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02171/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02171-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE SMITH, SR.,

Plaintiff, 2:06-cv-2171-GEB-GGH-PS

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

__________________________________/

On February 26, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-02171-GEB-GGH Document 6 Filed 05/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 26, 2007, are ADOPTED;

and

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: May 1, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-02171-GEB-GGH Document 6 Filed 05/01/07 Page 2 of 2