Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00675/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00675-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Manuel Franco Ballesteros, )

 )

 Petitioner, ) CIV 06-675-PHX-EHC (MEA)

 )

vs. ) O R D E R

 ) 

Dora Schriro, et al., )

)

 )

 Respondents. )

 )

On March 8, 2006, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant

 to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. 1). A Response/Answer was filed September 5, 2006 (Dkt.

9) with Exhibits filed September 6, 2006. (Dkt. 10). On November 16, 2006, Petitioner

filed a Traverse/ Reply. (Dkt. 13). Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey issued a Report and

Recommendation on November 29, 2006. (Dkt. 14). Petitioner timely filed Objections

(Dkt. 16) to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation on January 25, 2007. (Dkt. 17).

STANDARD OF REVIEW

A district court judge reviews de novo the Report and Recommendation of a

Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Case 2:06-cv-00675-EHC Document 18 Filed 02/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

DISCUSSION

The Court having reviewed the record de novo, including the Objections filed by

Petitioner, adopts in full the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and

incorporates the same as a part of this Order.

Accordingly,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. 

(Dkt. 1).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. 14).

DATED this 26th day of February, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00675-EHC Document 18 Filed 02/28/07 Page 2 of 2