Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01397/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01397-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WILLIAM V. STICKLE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

R. COOK, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:12-cv-1397-KJM-EFB P 

ORDER 

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On February 27, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. On March 31, 2014, this court adopted the 

findings and recommendations and denied summary judgment as to defendant Wohlers but 

granted summary judgment to defendant Williams. On April 3, 2014, plaintiff filed belated 

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:12-cv-01397-KJM-EFB Document 66 Filed 05/15/14 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 In an abundance of caution, the court now reconsiders its March 31, 2014 order adopting 

the findings and recommendations in light of plaintiff’s objections. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 

60(b). 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, the 

court has now conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

proper analysis. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order entered on March 31, 2014 (ECF 

No. 55) adopting in full the findings and recommendations, denying summary judgment as to 

defendant Wohlers and granting summary judgment to defendant Williams, is CONFIRMED. 

DATED: May 14, 2014. 

Case 2:12-cv-01397-KJM-EFB Document 66 Filed 05/15/14 Page 2 of 2