Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02159/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02159-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRIS CRISTOBAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 2:21-cv-02159-MCE-CKD

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT 

TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42. U.S.C. § 

405(g)

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

PETER K. THOMPSON

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

CASPAR CHAN, CSBN 294804

Special Assistant United States Attorney

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: 510-970-4810

Facsimile: 415-744-0134

Email: caspar.chan@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

 

 

Case 2:21-cv-02159-MCE-CKD Document 12 Filed 07/26/22 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their undersigned 

attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that the Commissioner of Social Security has agreed to a 

voluntary remand of this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The purpose of the 

remand is to offer Plaintiff a new decision.

On remand, the Commissioner will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to: conduct a new 

hearing pursuant to which the Plaintiff may testify and submit additional evidence; consider all of the 

Plaintiff's medically determinable impairments; re-evaluate the medical evidence and opinions and all 

of the other evidence of record; evaluate the Plaintiff's subjective allegations; further develop the record 

as necessary to complete the administrative record; conduct the sequential evaluation process by 

reassessing the Plaintiff's residual functional capacity; obtain additional vocational expert testimony if 

necessary; and issue a new decision. The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed 

to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the 

Commissioner.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: July 26, 2022 LAW OFFICE OF BARBARA M. RIZZO

By: /s/ Caspar Chan for Barbara Marie Rizzo *

BARBARA MARIE RIZZO

*Authorized by email on July 26, 2022 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Date: July 26, 2022 PHILIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

Eastern District of California

Case 2:21-cv-02159-MCE-CKD Document 12 Filed 07/26/22 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

By: /s/ Caspar Chan

CASPAR CHAN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

 Dated: July 26, 2022

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:21-cv-02159-MCE-CKD Document 12 Filed 07/26/22 Page 3 of 3