Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00899/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00899-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Ken I. Karan, Esq., California State Bar No. 204843

kkaran.law@gmail.com

LAW OFFICE OF KEN I. KARAN

3631-D Village Circle

Carlsbad, CA 92008

(760) 420-5488

Fax (866) 841-5420

Attorney for Plaintiff Steven C. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN C. MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Derral G. ADAMS, Warden, Corcoran

State Prison, William J. MCGUINNESS,

M.D., Chief Medical Officer, Corcoran

State Prison, Frances GARZA, nurse,

Emily VARGAS, nurse, Catherine NACAR

, nurse, Michael VAN NATTA, nurse,

Mark SMITH, nurse, Cornelio GARCIA,

correctional officer, Paul SENA,

correctional officer, and DOES 1 through

50, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 1:09!CV!00899!LJO!DLB

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO

CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

Hearing Date: March 2, 2010

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Location: Department 9

Judge: Hon. Dennis L. Beck

Plaintiff, by and through counsel, Ken I. Karan, and Defendants, by and through counsel

David A. Carrasco, stipulate as follows:

1. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the above captioned case.

2. The hearing on the motion is set for March 11, 2010.

3. The Court has set the Mandatory Scheduling Conference for March 2, 2010.

4. The parties’ input to the Joint Scheduling Conference Report will be affected by the

outcome of the motion.

5. In order to make the best use of the Court’s time, the parties agree to continue the

1

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Case 1:09-cv-00899-LJO-DLB Document 21 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mandatory Scheduling Conference to a date 30 days after the March 2 hearing, or to a date the

Court finds appropriate given the need to meet and confer and draft the Joint Scheduling

Conference Report.

So stipulated,

Dated: February 10, 2010 Signed: /s/

Ken I. Karan, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: February 10, 2010 Signed: /s/

David A. Carrasco, Esq.

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

Having reviewed the stipulation to modify the Court’s order, and having found good

cause therefore, the stipulation is the order of the court. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference

is continued to April 22, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Case 1:09-cv-00899-LJO-DLB Document 21 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 2