Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03345/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03345-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Guy Tortice,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio; et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-3345-PHX-MHM 

ORDER

Plaintiff, Guy Tortice, filed his Civil Rights Complaint on October 21, 2005. (Dkt.#1).

On March 30, 2006 the Court issued a screen order advising Plaintiff that "at all times during

the pendency of this action, Plaintiff shall immediately advise the Court and the United States

Marshal of any change of address and its effective date. (Dkt.#3). On April 3, 2006

Plaintiff's copy of the March 30, 2006 orders were returned by the post-office with the

notation "Return to Sender" and "Unable to Forward." (Dkt.#5,6). On April 17, 2006, the

Magistrate Judge directed the Plaintiff to show cause by May 15, 2006 why this action

should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) Fed.R.Civ.P.

(Dkt.#7). The copy of the Magistrate Judge's order was returned by the post-office.

(Dkt.#8).

The Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation on May 19, 2006

recommending that Plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule

83.3(d) LR Civ.P and Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. (Dkt.#9). The Court notes that the

Case 2:05-cv-03345-MHM Document 11 Filed 06/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Plaintiff's copy of the Report and Recommendation has been returned by the post-office.

(Dkt.#10). The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge. 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court. (Dkt.#9).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case for Plaintiff's failure to comply

with Rule 83.3(d), Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Court for the

District of Arizona and Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.

DATED this 12th day of June, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03345-MHM Document 11 Filed 06/14/06 Page 2 of 2