Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00112/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00112-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA3

GEORGE SPITTAL, No. CIV-S-05-0112 MCE/DAD PS

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

JERRY HOUSEMAN, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled

action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On November 16, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings

and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and

which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. 

Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

///

Case 2:05-cv-00112-MCE -DAD Document 30 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 16,

2005, are adopted in full; 

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. no. 16) is granted;

3. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. no. 18) is

denied;

4. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is dismissed with

prejudice; and

5. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DATED: January 25, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00112-MCE -DAD Document 30 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 2