Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00302/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00302-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 540
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK D. LESLIE, 

Petitioner, 2:06-cv-0302-GEB-CMK-P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

AND REHABILITATION, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a “Petition for Writ of

Mandamus/Prohibition,” which the court construes as an application for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 14, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00302-GEB-CMK Document 6 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 14, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner’s application of a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed without

prejudice.

Dated: October 17, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00302-GEB-CMK Document 6 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 2