Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02212/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02212-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CLARIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF STAY 

CASE NO. C 03-2212 SI 

Peter H. Kang (SBN 158101) <pkang@sidley.com> 

Hae-Won Min Liao (SBN 234105) <hminliao@sidley.com> 

Kevin P. Burke (SBN 241972) <kburke@sidley.com> 

Duy D. Nguyen (SBN 246271) <ddnguyen@sidley.com> 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Attorneys For Plaintiff 

Romirico Remeidio 

EDMUND G. BROWN JR. 

Attorney General of the State of California 

DAVID S. CHANEY 

Chief Assistant Attorney General 

FRANCES T. GRUNDER 

Senior Assistant Attorney General 

THOMAS S. PATTERSON 

Supervising Deputy Attorney General 

JAY C. RUSSELL (SBN 122626) <jay.russell@doj.ca.gov> 

Deputy Attorney General 

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 

San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 

Telephone: (415) 703-5717 

Facsimile: (415) 703-5843 

Attorneys for Defendants J. Woodford, I. Nienhuis, 

D. Wooten, D. Dacanay, and A. Kane 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ROMIRICO REMEIDIO, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

J. WOODFORD, et. al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 03-2212 SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR CLARIFICATION AND EXTENSION 

OF STAY PENDING EXECUTION OF 

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

Case 3:03-cv-02212 Document 66 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-02212-SI Document 67 Filed 04/06/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CLARIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF STAY 

CASE NO. C 03-2212 SI 

Plaintiff Romirico Remeidio and Defendants Jeanne Woodford, Ido Nienhuis, Dewey 

Wooten, Donald Dacanay, and Anthony Kane, through their respective counsel of record, stipulate 

and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, an order of dismissal was entered by this Court on March 2, 2007, giving the 

parties ninety (90) days to prepare and execute a formal settlement agreement; 

WHEREAS, the parties’ stipulation to a stay pending execution of a settlement agreement 

was entered by this Court on March 7, 2007, giving the parties one hundred twenty (120) days to 

prepare and execute a formal settlement agreement; 

WHEREAS, an essential term of the formal settlement agreement is delivery of a signed 

dismissal by Plaintiff to Defendants and filing of the dismissal by Defendants only upon satisfaction 

of certain terms and conditions of the agreement; 

WHEREAS, the parties require additional time to agree on the prerequisite terms and 

conditions for delivery of the signed dismissal, and good cause exists for an extension of the stay of 

the action for an additional thirty (30) days; 

THEREFORE, it is hereby STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, by and through 

their respective counsel of record, as follows: 

1. The order of dismissal of March 2, 2007 is vacated; and 

2. The stay pending execution of a settlement agreement of March 7, 2007 shall be 

effective and shall be extended an additional thirty (30) days, and shall expire on August 6, 2007. 

Case 3:03-cv-02212 Document 66 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-02212-SI Document 67 Filed 04/06/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CLARIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF STAY 

CASE NO. C 03-2212 SI 

AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD: 

Respectfully submitted, 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

By: /s/ Duy D. Nguyen 

Dated: April 5, 2007 

Peter H. Kang 

Hae-Won Min Liao 

Kevin Burke 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Romirico Remeidio 

Dated: April 5, 2007 OFFICE OF THE CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY 

GENERAL

By: /s/ Thomas S. Patterson 

Edmund G. Brown Jr. 

David S. Chaney 

Frances T. Grunder 

Thomas S. Patterson 

Attorneys for Defendants 

J. Woodford, I. Nienhuis, D. Wooten, D. 

Dacanay, and A. Kane 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________________ ________________________________________ 

 SUSAN ILLSTON 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-02212 Document 66 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 3 of 3

4/6/07

Case 3:03-cv-02212-SI Document 67 Filed 04/06/07 Page 3 of 3