Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03836/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03836-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NSIGHT, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

PEOPLESOFT, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. 3:04 CV 3836 MMC (MEJ)

ORDER REINSTATING IN PERSON

MEET AND CONFER REQUIREMENT

On January 17, 2006, the Court issued an order permitting the parties to meet and confer by

telephone for purposes of resolving discovery disputes. Given recent filings by plaintiff, it appears

that the spirit of the meet and confer requirement is not being honored. Accordingly, the Court

hereby REINSTATES the in person meet and confer requirement. The parties shall comply with the

undersigned's discovery standing order for all disputes. Further, all communication with the Court

must be in writing and e-filed, with a chambers copy of all filed documents provided by noon of the

next business day. The parties shall comply with Civil Local Rule 11-4(c) regarding ex parte

communications with the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 1, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03836-MMC Document 146 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 1