Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00035/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00035-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

RICO HAYES, )

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

C. MILLIGAN, et. al., )

) 

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 05-0035 AWI DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM 285 FORMS

Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an amended

complaint filed on December 6, 2005. The amended complaint appears to state cognizable claims

for relief for violation of due process against the named defendants. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for defendants C. Milligan, R. Brown and D. Edwards.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff three (3) USM-285 forms, three (3)

summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the amended complaint filed December 6, 2005.

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

Case 1:05-cv-00035-ALA Document 17 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

Court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Four (4) copies of the endorsed complaint filed December 6, 2005.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 27, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00035-ALA Document 17 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 2