Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01510/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01510-44/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES

MASTER FILE NO. C-08-01510-WHA

sf-2788202

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE CHARLES SCHWAB CORP. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION

Master File No. C-08-01510-WHA

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ 

SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO 

INTERROGATORIES

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 340 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES

MASTER FILE NO. C-08-01510-WHA

1

sf-2788202

On January 4, 2010 defendants filed a letter brief requesting an order compelling plaintiffs 

to supplement their responses to Schwab Investments’ Second Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff 

Robert Dickson, Defendant Charles Schwab & Co.’s First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff Kevin 

O’Donnell, and Defendant Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.’s First Set of 

Interrogatories to Plaintiff David Mikelonis (the “Interrogatories”). Plaintiffs filed their 

opposition on January 6, 2010. The matter came for hearing before the Court on January 7, 2010. 

Upon considering the papers filed with the Court and the arguments of the parties, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Schwab defendants shall inform plaintiffs of the specific Interrogatories, not 

to exceed 50, as to which they seek supplemental response, at or before noon, January 8, 2010.

2. Plaintiffs shall supplement their responses to those Interrogatories, consistent with 

the Court’s instructions at the January 7, 2010 hearing. Plaintiffs shall serve the supplemental 

responses on or before January 25, 2010.

3. The Schwab defendants shall have 10 days from plaintiffs’ service of the 

supplemental responses to seek any related relief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2010 ___________________________________________

The Honorable William Alsup

United States District Judge

Form of [Proposed] Order agreed upon by all parties. 

January 19

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 340 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 2