Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00889/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00889-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 1

 Hally v. Scribner, CIV-S-04-0828 RRB CMK P.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JABAR HALLY,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0889 MCE KJM P

vs.

T. FELKER,

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Court records reveal that petitioner has previously

filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus attacking the conviction and sentence challenged

in this case.1

 The previous application was filed on March 29, 2004, and was denied on the

merits on April 2, 2007. Before petitioner can proceed with the instant application he must move

in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for an order authorizing the district

court to consider the application. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). Therefore, petitioner's application

must be dismissed without prejudice to its refiling upon obtaining authorization from the United

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Case 2:07-cv-00889-MCE -KJM Document 3 Filed 05/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 17, 2007. 

1

hall0889.suc

Case 2:07-cv-00889-MCE -KJM Document 3 Filed 05/18/07 Page 2 of 2