Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03136/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03136-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MARILYN JO CHINIVASAGAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUILON ENTERPRISES, LLC, 

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 09- 3136 JW (PVT)

INTERIM ORDER re Parties Proposed

Form of Protective Order

Currently pending before the court is the parties proposed form of protective order to govern

the handling of confidential information produced or used in connection with this case. Based on the

parties’ proposed form of order,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than February 26, 2010, the parties shall file a

revised form of protective order that: 

1. Adds to the language of the “Agreement to Comply With Protective Order” at

page 7, lines 4-10, a space for the date and docket number of the protective

order;

2. Conforms Paragraph 17 to Paragraph 8 of this court’s model form of

stipulated protective order (copies of the model form of stipulated protective

order are available from the clerk of the court or the court’s website at

www.cand.uscourts.gov);

3. Replaces Paragraphs 18 and 19 with Paragraph 10 of the court’s model form

of stipulated protective order. Absent a court order with regard to a specific

document, all documents submitted to the court in connection with any kind

Case 5:09-cv-03136-JW Document 31 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

of motion, application, petition or other pretrial proceeding must be filed, not

lodged.

4. Eliminates Paragraph 28. If a party believes a document fits the categories set

forth in that paragraph, the procedure set forth in Paragraph 24 should be

followed. 

5. Eliminates Paragraph 29. If a party believes that someone already has or has

obtained legitimate possession of a Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only

information, the party shall seek the designating party’s written permission, or

a court order, allowing the party or counsel to discuss the information with

that individual;

6. Revises Paragraph 30 to require notification by at least one other means in

addition to facsimile transmission;

7. Eliminates Paragraph 35. All materials filed under seal become part of the

official court record and will not be returned to the parties.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending entry of the final form of protective order, the

provisions of the parties’ proposed form of protective order, as modified herein, shall govern the

handling of confidential information produced or disclosed during discovery in this case.

Dated: 1/27/10

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:09-cv-03136-JW Document 31 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2