Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-02016/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-02016-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 On April 13, 2009 Defendant filed a “Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for

Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant’s Counterclaim.” (Doc. No. 73.) However, Plaintiff has not filed

a motion for dismissal of Defendant’s counterclaim. In fact, no counterclaim has been filed in this

case. The Court therefore construes Defendant’s Statement of Non-Opposition as a response to

Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Counts I-IV of the complaint. 

- 1 - 07cv2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN SCHUSSLER and SCHUSSLER

CREATIVE, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 07cv2016 IEG (AGB)

ORDER GRANTING

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

[Doc. No. 71.]

vs.

J. FRANK WEBSTER,

Defendant.

On March 9, 2009, the Court entered an amended declaratory judgment in favor of Plaintiffs,

and granted Plaintiffs’ motion for a permanent injunction consistent with the declaratory judgment.

(Doc. No. 70.) Presently before the court is Plaintiffs’ notice of voluntary dismissal of the remaining

claims (Counts I-IV) of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). (Doc. No. 71.) Defendant

does not oppose the motion.1 The Court accordingly finds good cause and GRANTS Plaintiffs’

motion to dismiss this matter without prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 30, 2009

IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Case 3:07-cv-02016-IEG-AJB Document 75 Filed 04/30/09 Page 1 of 1