Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01830/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01830-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE 

Case No.: C 04-01830 CRB (JL) 

1-DA/2028255.1 

1

DAVID C. BOHRER (SBN 212397) 

dbohrer@morganlewis.com 

MICHAEL J. LYONS (SBN 202284) 

mlyons@morganlewis.com 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

Two Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

Telephone: (650) 843-4000 

Facsimile: (650) 843-4001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD. 

DANIEL M. PRESS, ESQ. 

dpress@chung-press.com 

JUAN CHARDIET, ESQ. 

jchardiet@chung-press.com 

CHUNG & PRESS, P.C. 

6723 Whittier Ave., Suite 302 

McLean, VA 22101 

Telephone: (703) 734-3800 

Facsimile: (703) 734-0590 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

DAEWOO ELECTRONICS, et al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DAEWOO ELECTRONICS 

CORPORATION, et al. 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 04-01830 CRB (JL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR 

SUPPLEMENTATION OF DISCLOSURES 

AND RESPONSES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 

26(e) 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / /

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 257 Filed 07/13/06 Page 1 of 4
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE 

Case No.: C 04-01830 CRB (JL) 

1-DA/2028255.1 

2

WHEREAS, on July 5, 2006, the Court approved and adopted the Stipulated Scheduling 

Order submitted by Plaintiff Funai Electric Company, Ltd. (“Funai”) and Defendants Daewoo 

Electronics Corporation (“DEC”) and Daewoo Electronics America, Inc. (“DEAM”) 

(collectively, “the Parties”); 

WHEREAS, the deadline for “Supplementation of disclosures and responses under Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 26(e)” set forth in the Scheduling Order is July 21, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the deadline for completion of fact and expert discovery is March 30, 2007; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the Parties stipulate to extend the 

deadline for “Supplementation of disclosures and responses under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e)” to March 

30, 2007, so that the Parties will have the opportunity to resolve all outstanding discovery 

disputes and complete all necessary discovery prior to providing the required supplementation 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e); 

WHEREAS, notwithstanding the extension of the above deadline, the Parties 

acknowledge their duty under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 to timely supplement their disclosures and 

discovery responses with newly acquired information; 

WHEREAS, the requested time modification will not have any prejudicial effect on the 

remaining deadlines in the case; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have previously been granted time modifications in the case as set 

forth below: 

(i) Order granting Defendants’ motion to answer, respond or otherwise plead to the 

Complaint, dated July 6, 2004; 

(ii) Order granting continuance of deadlines through case management conference, 

dated August 31, 2004 (by stipulation); 

(iii) Order fixing deadline for Defendants’ answers, dated October 5, 2004 (by 

stipulation); 

(iv) Order extending time for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants’ answer and 

counterclaims, dated November 29, 2004 (by stipulation); and, 

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 257 Filed 07/13/06 Page 2 of 4
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE 

Case No.: C 04-01830 CRB (JL) 

1-DA/2028255.1 

3

(v) Order continuing hearing on motion to compel, dated March 14, 2005 (by 

stipulation); 

THEREFORE, good cause exists to extend the deadline for the Parties to supplement 

disclosures and responses under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) to March 30, 2007. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: July 11, 2006 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

By: /s/ David C. Bohrer

David C. Bohrer 

Michael J. Lyons 

Dated: July 11, 2006 CHUNG & PRESS, P.C. 

By: /s/ Daniel M. Press

Daniel M. Press 

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 257 Filed 07/13/06 Page 3 of 4
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE 

Case No.: C 04-01830 CRB (JL) 

1-DA/2028255.1 

4

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I, David C. Bohrer, 

attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 

signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that 

the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed this July 11, 2006, at Palo Alto. 

/s/ David C. Bohrer

David C. Bohrer 

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________ _________________________________________ 

 CHARLES R. BREYER 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

July 12, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 257 Filed 07/13/06 Page 4 of 4