Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-02347/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-02347-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Nirobia G. Bracy, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Phoenix, City of, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-02347-PHX-JAT

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for screening pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e) which includes an argument for why this Court should dismiss this case 

at the screening stage. Because the filing fee was paid before the Federal Court, and 

because Plaintiff is not in custody, this Court finds no basis to screen the complaint 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Accordingly, the motion will be denied. Defendants 

shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint (including filing a motion to dismiss 

on the same or different grounds as those identified in the motion for screening if they 

deem that to be the appropriate course) as set forth below. 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for screening (part of Doc. 4) is denied. The 

motion to dismiss (part of Doc. 4) is denied without prejudice. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:15-cv-02347-JAT Document 8 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond 

to the complaint by January 12, 2016. 

 Dated this 23rd day of December, 2015. 

Case 2:15-cv-02347-JAT Document 8 Filed 12/23/15 Page 2 of 2