Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00236/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00236-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW S. ANDERSEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARISELA MONTES et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:16-cv-00236-DAD-SAB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND 

MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW 

CAUSE

(Doc. Nos. 9, 10, 13)

Plaintiff Andrew S. Andersen is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On December 13, 2016, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 

recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s requests for injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. 

No. 13.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that 

objections thereto were to be filed within thirty days. Over thirty days have passed, and no 

objections have been filed. 

/////

Case 1:16-cv-00236-DAD-SAB Document 14 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 

and recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly,

1. The December 13, 2016 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 13) are adopted in 

full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 9) and motion for an order to 

show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be issued (Doc. No. 10) are 

denied without prejudice as premature.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 30, 2017 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00236-DAD-SAB Document 14 Filed 01/31/17 Page 2 of 2