Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05459/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05459-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

- 1 – 

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUTOFF... 

Boyd v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICES OF VICKI I. SARMIENTO 

VICKI I. SARMIENTO, SBN 134047 

333 North Garfield Avenue 

Alhambra, California 91801 

Telephone: (626) 308-1171 

SCHONBRUN, DeSIMONE, SEPLOW, 

HARRIS & HOFFMAN 

PAUL HOFFMAN, SBN 71244 

MICHAEL MORRISON, SBN 205320 

723 Ocean Front Walk 

Venice, California 90291 

Telephone: (310) 396-0731 

Attorneys for ISABEL GONZALEZ, and KANANI BOYD, Minors 

LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO 

Dale K. Galipo, SBN 144074 

21800 Burbank Blvd., Suite 310 

Woodland Hills, California 91367 

Telephone: (818) 347-3333 

Attorney for MARYLON BOYD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARYLON BOYD, individually and as 

Executor of the Estate of CAMMERIN BOYD, 

deceased, ISABEL GONZALEZ, a minor by 

and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Isela 

Gonzalez, and KANANI BOYD, a minor by 

and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Kamilah 

Boyd, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

HEATHER J. FONG, WILLIAM ELIEFF, 

GREGORY KANE, JAMES O’MALLEY, 

TIMOTHY PAINE, STEVEN STEARNS, and 

DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: 04-5459 MMC 

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 

DISCOVERY CUTOFF, INITIAL 

EXPERT AND REBUTTAL DISCLOSURE

DATES; [PROPOSED ORDER] 

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 182 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 4
- 2 – 

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUTOFF... 

Boyd v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order, discovery cut-off is presently 

scheduled for January 15, 2007, with initial expert disclosure scheduled for January 29, 2007, 

and rebuttal expert disclosure scheduled for February 12, 2007. 

WHEREAS, the parties stipulate to a short continuance of discovery cut-off to 

February 27, 2007, to complete pending depositions only (not for written discovery), and 

continuance of expert disclosures and reports to March 22, 2007, and rebuttal expert 

exchange to April 12, 2007. 

WHEREAS, the parties have encountered difficulty getting some witnesses to appear at 

depositions and there are pending depositions that have not taken place due to this problem 

coupled with scheduling problems which the parties attempted to resolve but are unable to 

accomplish prior to the present cutoff date. The pending depositions yet to be completed are 

those depositions that were noticed prior to the present cutoff. 

 WHEREAS, the completion of the pending depositions is necessary prior to 

completing expert disclosure as the experts will likely rely on the depositions yet to be 

completed. 

WHEREAS, the present dispositive motion cutoff will not be affected, and counsel for 

defendants agree to file dispostive motions on March 15, 2007, and no earlier than this date. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 182 Filed 01/11/07 Page 2 of 4
- 3 – 

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUTOFF... 

Boyd v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WHEREAS, the requested continuance will not disturb the pretrial conference and trial 

dates as presently set by the Court, and is in the interest of justice to all parties. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

 LAW OFFICES OF VICKI I. SARMIENTO 

DATED: January 10, 2007 By:____/s/______________________________ 

 VICKI I. SARMIENTO 

Attorney for Plaintiffs Isabel Gonzalez and 

Kanani Boyd, minors 

 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO 

 

DATED: January 10, 2007 By:____/s/______________________________ 

 DALE K. GALIPO 

Attorney for Plaintiff Marylon Boyd 

 DENNIS J. HERRERA 

 City Attorney 

 JOANNE HOEPER 

 Chief Trial Deputy 

 BLAKE P. LOEBS 

 SCOTT D. WIENER 

 Deputy City Attorneys 

DATED: January 10, 2007 By:__/s/_________________________________ 

 BLAKE P. LOEBS 

 Attorneys for all Defendants 

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 182 Filed 01/11/07 Page 3 of 4
- 4 – 

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUTOFF... 

Boyd v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Discovery cut-off is continued to February 27, 2007. Initial expert disclosure and 

exchange of expert reports is continued to March 22, 2007, and rebuttal expert exchange is 

continued to April 12, 2007. 

DATED: _______________ ____________________________________

 HONORABLE MAXINE CHESNEY 

January 11, 2007

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 182 Filed 01/11/07 Page 4 of 4