Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01674/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01674-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BANQUO D. YOUNG,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-03-1674 MCE CMK P

vs.

JOE McGRATH, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

On July 11, 2005, petitioner submitted a “motion to request leave to file a second

amended petition for writ of habeas corpus.” That document was not served on respondent. 

Petitioner is advised that every document submitted to the court for consideration must be served

on respondent. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5; Rule 11, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. Documents not to

be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. Mail. If an attorney has

filed a document with the court on behalf of respondent, then documents submitted by petitioner

must be served on that attorney and not on the respondent himself. Every document submitted

conventionally to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate

stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to respondent or his attorney and

the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

/////

Case 2:03-cv-01674-MCE -CMK Document 27 Filed 07/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s July 11, 2005 “motion

to request leave to file a second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus” will be placed in the

court file and disregarded. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to properly serve any documents

subsequently filed in this action, and failure to include a proper certificate of service with such

filing, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

DATED: July 15, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-01674-MCE -CMK Document 27 Filed 07/18/05 Page 2 of 2