Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00620/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00620-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDERICK MARCELES COOLEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-620-TLN-KJN PS

ORDER

On June 20, 2014, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations (ECF No. 

29), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were 

filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

1983). 

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 29) are adopted. 

Case 2:14-cv-00620-TLN-KJN Document 33 Filed 07/23/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 27) is denied. 

Dated: July 21, 2014

Case 2:14-cv-00620-TLN-KJN Document 33 Filed 07/23/14 Page 2 of 2