Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00988/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00988-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD E. WILMSHURST, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0988 DFL KJM PS

vs.

BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

On April 22, 2005, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, which currently is calendared for

hearing on June 8, 2005. No opposition to the motion to dismiss has been filed. 

Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party

will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to

the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may

be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.”

Case 2:04-cv-00988-DFL -KJM Document 64 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of June 8, 2005 is vacated. Hearing on defendants’ motion to

dismiss is continued to June 29, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than

June 15, 2005. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement

of non-opposition and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: June 1, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

wilmshurst.nop

Case 2:04-cv-00988-DFL -KJM Document 64 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2