Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00431/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00431-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26:7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

)

GEORGE LOREN REED, et al., )

)

)

Defendant. )

)

)

)

No. CV-F-05-431 REC/LJO 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT FROM

DECEMBER 19, 2005 TO MONDAY,

JANUARY 9, 2006 AT 1:30

P.M., CONTINUING STATUS

CONFERENCE FROM DECEMBER 20,

2005 TO TUESDAY, JANUARY 10,

2006 AT 8:30 A.M. AND

DENYING DEFENDANT GEORGE

LOREN REED’S MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

Defendants George Loren Reed, Duane Reed, and Shirley Lundy,

each of whom has had defaults entered against them by the Clerk,

did not receive notice from the court that the hearing on

plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, Final Judgment and Order

of Foreclosure was continued from December 9, 2005 to December

19, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. Because the defendants in default are

entitled to notice of hearing on plaintiff’s motion pursuant to

Rule 55, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court continues

the hearing on plaintiff’s motion from December 19, 2005 to

Monday, January 9, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Robert E. Coyle

in Courtroom One. The court also continues the status conference

set for December 20, 2005 to Tuesday, January 10, 2006 at 8:30

Case 1:05-cv-00431-OWW -LJO Document 46 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

a.m. before Magistrate Judge O’Neill in Courtroom Six. 

The court denies the motion for extension of time filed by

defendant George Loren Reed wherein he requests a 60 day

extension of time to seek counsel. Defendant has had ample time

to obtain counsel in this matter. The court further advises

defendants that Rule 83-183(a), Local Rules of Practice, provides

in pertinent part:

Any individual who is representing himself or

herself without an attorney must appear

personally or by courtesy appearance by an

attorney admitted to the Bar of this Court

and may not delegate that duty to any other

individual, including husband or wife, or any

other party on the same side appearing

without an attorney. Any individual

representing himself or herself without an

attorney is bound by the Federal Rules of

Civil ... Procedure and by these Local Rules. 

All obligations placed on ‘counsel’ by these

Local Rules apply to individuals appearing in

propria persona. Failure to comply therewith

may be ground for dismissal, judgment by

default, or any other sanction appropriate

under these Rules. A corporation or other

entity may appear only by an attorney.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 13, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00431-OWW -LJO Document 46 Filed 12/13/05 Page 2 of 2