Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-02113/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-02113-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GABRIEL L. JORDAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ESPINOZA, ET AL., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 14-cv-02113-YGR 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO 

PROSECUTE

Plaintiff Gabriel L. Jordan, proceeding pro se, brings this action against certain officers 

from the San Francisco Police Department and the California Highway Patrol alleging the use of 

unconstitutionally excessive force. The Court previously dismissed this action for failure to 

prosecute, but withdrew the same after learning from plaintiff that he was currently incarcerated. 

(Dkt. No. 102.) The Court concurrently set a case management conference for Monday, February 

27, 2017, and instructed the parties to file a case management statement in compliance with the 

Local Rules and the Court’s Standing Order no later than February 20, 2017. (Id.) Defendants 

submitted a case management statement on February 17, 2017, indicating that they had not 

received any communications from plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 105.) Plaintiff has yet to file a case 

management statement. 

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his case should not be dismissed for 

failure to prosecute. No later than Friday, March 24, 2017, plaintiff must file a statement 

explaining his failure to comply with the Court’s order, expressing his intent to continue pursuit of 

this litigation, and providing the Court with any updates as to his current address. Failure to file 

such a statement will be deemed an admission that no good cause exists and that dismissal of the 

instant action for failure to prosecute is appropriate. The Court further reminds plaintiff that it is 

Case 4:14-cv-02113-YGR Document 106 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

his responsibility to communicate with the Court and update the Court on his current 

circumstances. 

The Court VACATES the case management conference currently set for Monday, February 

27, 2017. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

______________________________________ 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

February 22, 2017

Case 4:14-cv-02113-YGR Document 106 Filed 02/22/17 Page 2 of 2