Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06373/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06373-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRY CRANDALL MINCEY, )

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

)

No. CV-F-04-6373 REC

(No. CR-F-97-5266 OWW)

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S

EX PARTE MOTION TO UNSEAL

ORDER IN NO. CR-F-97-5266

FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF

PROVIDING COPY TO RESPONDENT

The ex parte motion of the United States to unseal the

"ORDER UNDER SEAL DENYING DEFENDANT MINCEY'S SECOND MOTION FOR

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL" filed in No. CR-F-97-5266 on November

29, 2000 as document no. 441 is granted subject to the following

conditions.

The Clerk of the Court is authorized to unseal the Order for

the sole and limited purpose of providing a copy to the United

States. In all other respects, the Order is to remain sealed.

The United States may refer to the Order for the sole 

purpose of responding to petitioner's application for a

Case 1:04-cv-06373-REC Document 6 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

certificate of appealability presenting pending before the Ninth

Circuit Court of Appeal and, if the certificate of appealability

is granted by the Ninth Circuit, for the purpose of responding to

the merits of petitioner's appeal of the denial of his motion to

vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255. The United States is precluded from using the Order or any

representations made therein for any other purpose or from

disclosing the contents of the Order to any other persons or

offices. See Bittaker v. Woodford, 331 F.3d 715 (9th Cir.),

cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1013 (2003).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 23, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06373-REC Document 6 Filed 06/23/06 Page 2 of 2