Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-04236/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-04236-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

Case No. 13-cv-04236-BLF

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW ENTERPRISE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHRYSLER GROUP LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-04236-BLF

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL

(Re: Docket No. 192)

Before the court is a motion to seal by Defendant Chrysler Group LLC.

1

Each document 

that Chrysler seeks to seal was designated as confidential by Plaintiff Mathew Enterprise, Inc.2 

Where a party seeks to seal documents that its opponent has designated as confidential, “the 

Submitting Party’s declaration in support of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal must 

identify the document or portions thereof which contain the designated confidential material.”3 

Within four days, the party designating material as sealable—here, MEI—then “must file a 

declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material 

is sealable.”4 MEI has not filed such a declaration. The motion to seal therefore is DENIED.

 

1

See Docket No. 192.

2

See Docket No. 192-1 at ¶¶ 2-3.

3 Civ. L.R. 79-5(e).

4 Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

Case 5:13-cv-04236-BLF Document 224 Filed 05/16/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 13-cv-04236-BLF

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 16, 2016

_________________________________

PAUL S. GREWAL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:13-cv-04236-BLF Document 224 Filed 05/16/16 Page 2 of 2