Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00360/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00360-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAKESH DHINGRA,

Plaintiff,

v.

USA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-00360-JCS 

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 

MOTION TO DISMISS ORIGINAL 

COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 17

After Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff Rakesh Dhingra’s original complaint, Dhingra 

filed an amended complaint as permitted by Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. The amended complaint supersedes the original complaint, and the motion to dismiss 

the original complaint is therefore DENIED AS MOOT, without prejudice to Defendants bringing 

a new motion in response to the amended complaint.

Although Dhingra’s motion to stay this action remains on calendar for June 28, 2019, the 

parties are advised that if Defendants file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, the hearing 

on the motion to stay will be continued to coincide with that motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 11, 2019

______________________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

Chief Magistrate Judge

Case 3:19-cv-00360-JCS Document 24 Filed 06/11/19 Page 1 of 1