Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04669/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04669-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICOH COMPANY, LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-03-4669 MJJ (EMC)

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS'

MOTION TO MOVE SANCTIONS

MOTION HEARING DATE

(Docket No. 394)

The Court, having reviewed the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion,

and good cause appearing therefor, hereby denies Defendants’ motion to move the hearing date on

Plaintiff Ricoh's motion for sanctions, set for April 19, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. Defendants have failed to

show good cause to continue the hearing. Neither party has asked for an evidentiary hearing and so

Ms. Fink’s testimony is not needed at that hearing. Furthermore, Defendants have had ample

opportunity to submit testimonial evidence from Ms. Fink by way of declaration. Defendants have

not demonstrated why other counsel from Howrey LLP can not argue the motion

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 28, 2006 EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:03-cv-04669-JW Document 399 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 1