Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20718/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20718-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

1

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GARY KREMEN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

STEPHEN MICHAEL COHEN, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 98-20718 JW (PVT)

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS 

On April 10, 2007, Plaintiff filed evidentiary objections to Defendant Cohen’s

(“Defendant”) motions. Based on the objections filed and Defendant’s motion papers,

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s objections are overruled as MOOT in light of

this court’s ruling on Defendant’s motions, filed concurrently herewith. Plaintiff did not assert

any objections to the copies of the three subpoenas submitted with Defendant’s motions, and

Plaintiff has not contended they are not accurate copies of the subpoenas served by Plaintiff on

Walter Howard, the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services, and Southwest Airlines. In

light of the court’s finding that all three subpoenas are defective on their face, Plaintiff’s

objections to Defendant’s other assertions of fact are moot.

Dated: 4/16/07

_________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:98-cv-20718-JW Document 1274 Filed 04/16/07 Page 1 of 1