Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02225/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02225-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANNY GEROME YOUNG, 

Plaintiff, 02:03-cv-2225-GEB-KJM-P

vs.

J. PULSIPHER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On January 9, 2006, defendants filed a request for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order filed December 30, 2005, requiring defendants to produce privileged

documents. On January 19, 2006, plaintiff filed a document suggesting it was a response to

defendants’ request, but appears to be independent objections. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-

303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 

Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s

ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed December 30, 2005, is affirmed. 

Dated: January 31, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-02225-KJM Document 59 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 1