Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03181/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03181-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -1- 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER 

Jaegel, et al. vs. The County of Alameda, et al.; USDC – Nor. Dist. Case No. 09-0242 CW 

Jaegel v. County of Alameda, et al.; USDC – Nor. Dist. Case No. 09-03181 CW 

GREGORY J. ROCKWELL, ESQ. (SBN 67305) 

grockwell@bjg.com

JILL P. SAZAMA, ESQ. (SBN 214215) 

jsazama@bjg.com

BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 

A Professional Corporation 

555 12th Street, Suite 1800 

P. O. Box 12925 

Oakland, CA 94604-2925 

Telephone: (510) 834-4350 

Facsimile: (510) 839-1897 

Attorneys for Defendants 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, GREGORY J. 

AHERN and JASON LUNA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARK ANTHONY JAEGEL SR, MARK 

ANTHONY JAEGEL JR., Individually and 

on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs.

THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 09-0242 CW 

Related Case No.: 09-03181 CW 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND

ORDER

Complaint Filed: January 20, 2009 

The undersigned hereby stipulate and jointly request the Court to order as follows: 

That this is a complex class action, which involves issues related to the search practices of 

the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office at its jail facilities over a period of years. 

That counsel for the plaintiffs have recently received over 4000 pages of documents from 

the defendant, and it is anticipated that the defendant will be producing a large volume of 

additional documents in the near future. 

That review of these documents must be completed before meaningful depositions of the 

defendant’s witnesses can be taken.

That the parties have agreed that initial depositions of the defendant’s witnesses will be 

taken on August 3, 4 and 5, 2010, and that it will likely take several months before plaintiffs’ 

Case 4:09-cv-03181-CW Document 20 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -2- 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER 

Jaegel, et al. vs. The County of Alameda, et al.; USDC – Nor. Dist. Case No. 09-0242 CW 

Jaegel v. County of Alameda, et al.; USDC – Nor. Dist. Case No. 09-03181 CW 

counsel will be able to conclude all necessary depositions. 

That the case management conference in both of the above actions set for July 13, 2010 

may be continued to September 14, 2010 at 2:00 p.m., or such other date and time as the court my 

order.

That the parties shall file a joint case management conference statement no later than 

September 7, 2010. 

DATED: July 6, 2010 

BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 

A Professional Corporation 

By: /s/Gregory J. Rockwell____________

GREGORY J. ROCKWELL, ESQ. 

Attorneys for Defendants 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, 

GREGORY J. AHERN and JASON 

LUNA

DATED: July 7, 2010 

JOHN R. COGORNO, Attorney At Law 

By: /s/ John R. Cogorno_____________

JOHN R. COGORNO, ESQ. 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ORDER

Good Cause appearing therefore, the Case Management Conference set for July 13, 2010 in 

actions 09-0242CW and 09-03181CW is hereby continued to September 14, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. 

The parties shall file a joint case management conference statement no later than September 7, 

2010.

Dated: 7/9/2010 ____________________________________

CLAUDIA WILKEN 

United States District Judge 

25913\507904 

Case 4:09-cv-03181-CW Document 20 Filed 07/09/10 Page 2 of 2