Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02714/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02714-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -1-

PROPOSED ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR DISCOVERY IN ADVANCE OF MSJ 

FLANAGAN V CITY OF RICHMOND ET AL, CASE NO. 14-CV-02714 EMC 

David M. Poore, SBN 192541 

Scott A. Brown, SBN 177099 

BROWN | POORE LLP 

1350 Treat Blvd., Suite 420 

Walnut Creek, California 94597 

Telephone: (925) 943-1166 

dpoore@bplegalgroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LOUDESIA FLANAGAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LOUDESIA FLANAGAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF RICHMOND; CHRISTOPHER 

MAGNUS; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 14-CV-02714 EMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFF LOUDESIA FLANAGAN’S 

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR 

DISCOVERY IN ADVANCE OF THE DUE 

DATE FOR THE OPPOSITION TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; REQUEST FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF MOTION FOR 

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

[F.R.C.P. 56; LOCAL RULES 6-1, 6-3] 

Hon. Edward Chen 

Courtroom 5, 17th Floor 

AMENDED

Case 3:14-cv-02714-EMC Document 44 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -2-

PROPOSED ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR DISCOVERY IN ADVANCE OF MSJ 

FLANAGAN V CITY OF RICHMOND ET AL, CASE NO. 14-CV-02714 EMC 

Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Discovery was presented to this Court. The matter is 

suitable for an order without a hearing or argument. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion is GRANTED. 

Plaintiff is permitted to take the deposition in advance of submitting an Opposition to 

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 39). Defendants’ Motion for Summary 

Judgment is continued to _____________________, 2015, with Opposition and Reply deadlines 

to fall in accordance with the new hearing date. 

SO ORDERED. 

Date: July __, 2015 ______________________________ 

 HON. EDWARD CHEN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

September 24

Opposition Brief Due: August 27, 2015. 

Reply Brief Due: Sepember 10, 2015. 31

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-02714-EMC Document 44 Filed 07/31/15 Page 2 of 2