Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_15-cv-00787/USCOURTS-almd-2_15-cv-00787-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12111 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DANIEL POSEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

HYUNDAI MOTOR 

MANUFACTURING ALABAMA, 

 

Defendant. 

 

 )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-787-WKW

ORDER

On March 11, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no 

timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 36.) Upon an independent review of the file 

and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that 

(1) The Recommendation is ADOPTED; 

(2) Defendant The Hartford’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 17) is DENIED as 

moot because Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed all of his claims against The Hartford 

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i);

(3) Defendant Hartford is DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action 

based on Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. # 31);

Case 2:15-cv-00787-ECM-WC Document 39 Filed 04/04/16 Page 1 of 2
(4) Defendant Hyundai’s Preliminary Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Class 

Allegations (Doc. # 21) and Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. # 20) are 

DENIED as moot;

(5) The claims against Defendant Hyundai omitted from the amended 

complaint, including Plaintiff’s class claims under the FMLA, ADA, and state law and 

Plaintiff’s individual claims under the FMLA and state law are DISMISSED without 

prejudice; and

(6) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings

DONE this 4th day of April, 2016.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00787-ECM-WC Document 39 Filed 04/04/16 Page 2 of 2