Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05642/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05642-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS; CASE NO. 

C-03-5642 JF (HRL) 

C:\NrPortbl\LEGAL\LSOBOCINSKI\236541_1.DOC 

Stuart M. Grant (pro hac vice) 

John C. Kairis (pro hac vice) 

Kimberly L. Wierzel (pro hac vice) 

Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. 

Chase Manhattan Centre 

1201 North Market Street 

Wilmington, DE 19801 

Tel: 302.622.7000 

Fax: 302.622.7100 

sgrant@gelaw.com 

Merrill Glen Emerick (State Bar No. 117248) 

Anderlini, Finkelstein, Emerick & Smoot 

400 S. El Camino Real - Suite 700 

San Mateo, CA 94402 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff 

The Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IN RE: 

REDBACK NETWORKS, INC. SECURITIES 

LITIGATION. 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case Number C 03-05642 JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS 

**E-filed 7/24/06**

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 241 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS; CASE NO. 

C-03-5642 JF (HRL) 

-1- C:\NrPortbl\LEGAL\LSOBOCINSKI\236541_1.DOC 

STIPULATION 

WHEREAS, on March 20, 2006, the Court entered an Order dismissing plaintiffs’ third 

amended consolidated complaint and granting plaintiffs leave to amend (the “Order”); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order, plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Consolidated Complaint 

for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (the “Complaint”) was filed on May 19, 2006; 

WHEREAS, on June 5, 2006 the Court entered an Order pursuant to which defendants’ 

motions to dismiss the Complaint are due to be filed on July 7, 2006, plaintiffs’ oppositions to 

any motions to dismiss the Complaint are due to be filed on August 4, 2006, and defendants’ 

replies in further support of their motions to dismiss the Complaint are due to be filed on August 

25, 2006; 

WHEREAS, this Court approved the stipulation between Plaintiffs and defendants Kevin 

DeNuccio, Pierre Lamond, Thomas Cronan, Vinod Khosla, Dennis Wolf, Vivek Ragavan, 

Dennis Barsema, Gaurav Garg, William Kurtz, Craig Gentner, Promod Haque and Randall 

Kruep (collectively, the “Redback Defendants”) allowing: 

a. The Redback Defendants to file a Joint Memorandum of Law in Support of their 

Motion to Dismiss on July 10, 2006 not to exceed 35 pages; 

b. Plaintiffs to file an opposition to the Redback Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss 

the Complaint on August 7, 2006 exceeding the twenty-five page limit imposed 

by Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), but not exceeding a total of thirty-five (35) pages, 

exclusive of caption page, table of contents, table of authorities, declarations and 

exhibits, and allowing plaintiffs to file one omnibus brief in opposition to all 

motions to dismiss, and such opposition shall be no more than the combined total 

of the pages (exclusive of caption page, tables of contents and authorities, 

declarations and exhibits) of all defendants’ motions to dismiss; and 

c. The Redback Defendants until August 25, 2006 to file a Reply in Further Support 

of the Motion to Dismiss not to exceed twenty (20) pages (exclusive of caption 

page, tables of contents and authorities, declarations and exhibits). 

WHEREAS, this Court entered an order approving the parties stipulation on July 6, 2006; 

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 241 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS; CASE NO. 

C-03-5642 JF (HRL) 

-2- C:\NrPortbl\LEGAL\LSOBOCINSKI\236541_1.DOC 

WHEREAS, Defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLC (“PwC”) filed a Motion to 

Dismiss on July 7, 2006 consisting of four (4) pages, exclusive of caption page, table of contents, 

table of authorities, declarations and exhibits; 

WHEREAS, PwC has no objection to Plaintiffs’ request to file an omnibus response to 

all motions to dismiss of thirty-nine (39) pages, exclusive of caption page, table of contents, table 

of authorities, declarations and exhibits, on August 7, 2006; and 

WHEREAS, the parties do not desire to change the scheduled hearing date. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, 

subject to approval of the Court, that: 

1. Plaintiffs shall have until and including August 7, 2006 to serve and file an 

omnibus memorandum of law in support of their opposition to defendants’ motions to dismiss. 

2. PwC shall have until and including August 25, 2006 to serve and file any replies 

in support of its motions to dismiss. 

3. The case management conference and the hearing on defendants’ motion to 

dismiss shall remain set for September 15, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 

4. Plaintiffs’ omnibus memorandum of law in opposition to the Redback 

Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss the Complaint and PWC’s motion to dismiss the Complaint 

may exceed the twenty-five page limit imposed by Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), but may not exceed a 

total of thirty-nine (39) pages, exclusive of caption page, table of contents, table of authorities, 

declarations and exhibits. 

Dated: July 20, 2006 GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 

By: /s/_Stuart M. Grant______________

Stuart M. Grant 

John C. Kairis 

Kimberly L. Wierzel 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff 

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 241 Filed 07/24/06 Page 3 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS; CASE NO. 

C-03-5642 JF (HRL) 

-3- C:\NrPortbl\LEGAL\LSOBOCINSKI\236541_1.DOC 

Dated: July 20, 2006 CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 

By: /s/_Rowan D. Wilson ________________

Rowan D. Wilson 

Thomas G. Rafferty 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 241 Filed 07/24/06 Page 4 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS; CASE NO. 

C-03-5642 JF (HRL) 

-4- C:\NrPortbl\LEGAL\LSOBOCINSKI\236541_1.DOC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing: 

1. Plaintiffs shall have until and including August 7, 2006 to serve and file an 

omnibus memorandum of law in support of their opposition to defendants’ motions to dismiss. 

2. PwC shall have until and including August 25, 2006 to serve and file any replies 

in support of its motions to dismiss. 

3. The case management conference and the hearing on defendants’ motion to 

dismiss shall remain set for September 15, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 

4. Plaintiffs’ omnibus memorandum of law in opposition to the Redback 

Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss the Complaint and PWC’s motion to dismiss the Complaint 

may exceed the twenty-five page limit imposed by Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), but may not exceed a 

total of thirty-nine (39) pages, exclusive of caption page, table of contents, table of authorities, 

declarations and exhibits. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________________ _______________________________ 

THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL 

United States District Judge 

7/24/06

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 241 Filed 07/24/06 Page 5 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS; CASE NO. 

C-03-5642 JF (HRL) 

-5- C:\NrPortbl\LEGAL\LSOBOCINSKI\236541_1.DOC 

 I, Stuart M. Grant, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Page Limits. In compliance with General 

Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Rowan D. Wilson has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: July 20, 2006 GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 

By: /s/ Stuart M. Grant__________________

Stuart M. Grant 

Attorney for Lead Plaintiff 

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 241 Filed 07/24/06 Page 6 of 6