Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03723/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03723-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1120.02P230 -1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-2800/C03-3723 TEH)

PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)

OK-HEE SHIM, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 240998)

PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

The Latham Square Building

1611 Telegraph Ave., Suite 1450

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-0292

Facsimile: (510) 452-5625

HOWARD MOORE, JR., ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 55228)

MOORE & MOORE

445 Bellevue, Suite 202

Oakland, CA 94610

Telephone: (510) 451-0104

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CLARK WALKER

SILVANO B. MARCHESI (SBN 42965)

County Counsel

BERNARD L. KNAPP (SBN 111720)

Deputy County Counsel

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

651 Pine Street, 9th Floor

Martinez, California 94553

Telephone: (925) 335-1800

Facsimile: (925) 335-1866

Email: bknap@cc.cccounty.us

Attorneys for Defendants

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, ET AL.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARK WALKER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, KEITH

RICHTER, and RICHARD GRACE,

Defendants.

 

AND RELATED CASE.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NOS. C05-2800 TEH 

C03-3723 TEH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO ENLARGE EXPERT

WITNESS DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 

Case 3:03-cv-03723-TEH Document 168 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1120.02P230 -2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-2800/C03-3723 TEH)

1. Plaintiff CLARK WALKER (“Chief Walker”) and Defendants CONTRA

COSTA COUNTY, KEITH RICHTER, and RICHARD GRACE, by and through their respective

counsel, jointly apply for an Order, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, to enlarge expert witness

discovery cut-off from October 24, 2006 to November 10, 2006 for the sole purpose of taking the

depositions of Dr. Mark D. Nathan and Ronn Coleman.

2. The parties have been diligent in conducting expert witness discovery. In the

first action, Plaintiff disclosed five (5) expert witnesses and one rebuttal expert witness, who have

all been deposed by Defendants. Defendants disclosed also disclosed five (5) expert witnesses, one

of whom was Ronn Coleman. Defendants subsequently withdrew one expert. Plaintiff has deposed

the remaining four (4) expert witnesses. Plaintiff deposed Mr. Coleman on January 6, 2006. 

3. In the related case, Plaintiff disclosed but withdrew one (1) expert witness. 

On September 28, 2006, Defendants disclosed three (3) expert witnesses, one of whom was

disclosed by Plaintiff in the first action. Ronn Coleman was disclosed again in the related case. On

October 20, 2006, Defendants served expert witness reports of Dr. Nathan and Ronn Coleman.

4. Good cause exists to enlarge the date to expert witness discovery cut-off,

because defense counsel has confirmed that neither Dr. Nathan or Ronn Coleman are available prior

to expert witness discovery dut-off on October 24, 2006. The parties request an extension of time to

permit Plaintiff to depose Dr. Nathan and Ronn Coleman based on their expert reports served on

October 20, 2006. The parties are continuing to meet and confer regarding the deposition dates.

5. Therefore, the parties respectfully request that expert witness discovery cutoff be enlarged from October 24, 2006 to November 10, 2006, solely to permit Plaintiff to depose

Dr. Nathan and Ronn Coleman.

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:03-cv-03723-TEH Document 168 Filed 10/25/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1120.02P230 -3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-2800/C03-3723 TEH)

DATED: October 24, 2006 PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

 /s/

 

OK-HEE SHIM, Attorneys for 

Plaintiff CLARK WALKER

DATED: October 24, 2006 SILVANO B. MARCHESI, County Counsel

 /s/

 

BERNARD L. KNAPP, Deputy County Counsel,

Attorneys for Defendants CONTRA COSTA

COUNTY, KEITH RICHTER, and RICHARD

GRACE

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that expert witness discovery cut-off for the sole purpose of taking the

depositions of Dr. Nathan and Ronn Coleman be enlarged from October 24, 2006 to November 10,

2006. NO OTHER TRIAL OR PRETRIAL DEADLINES OR DATES SHALL BE MODIFIED

 OR CHANGED AS A RESULT OF THIS ORDER. 

 Date: _____________ 

 HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

10/25/06

Case 3:03-cv-03723-TEH Document 168 Filed 10/25/06 Page 3 of 3