Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-01673/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-01673-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. C02-01673 JCS 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, an Illinois 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

FUJITSU LIMITED, a foreign corporation, 

FUJITSU GENERAL LIMITED, a foreign 

corporation, FUJITSU HITACHI PLASMA 

DISPLAY LIMITED, a foreign corporation, 

FUJITSU GENERAL AMERICA, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, FUJITSU 

MICROELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a 

California corporation,Defendants. Case No. C02-01673 JCS

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED 

ORDER SETTING THE

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON THE 

UNIVERSITY'S POST-APPEAL 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

FUJITSU'S COUNTERCLAIMS

AND COUNTERCLAIMS.

The parties to this action, through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as 

follows:

WHEREAS, the Court has previously set the University s Post-appeal Motion to Dismiss 

Fujitsu's Counterclaims and further case management conference for hearing on February 16, 

2007, at 9:30 a.m.;

Case 3:02-cv-01673-JCS Document 724 Filed 12/05/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. C02-01673 JCS

WHEREAS, the Court has previously ordered that the last brief on the Motion to Dismiss 

shall be due three (3) weeks prior to the hearing date;

WHEREAS, the Court has previously ordered that an updated joint case management 

conference statement shall be due by February 9, 2007;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, 

that:

1. Any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be due by January 12, 2007. 2. Any reply to an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be due by January 26, 2007. Dated: December 4, 2006 IRELL & MANELLA LLP

By: /s/

Reynaldo C. Barceló

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counterdefendant THE BOARD OF

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY

OF ILLINOIS

Dated: December 4, 2006 KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART 

NICHOLSON GRAHAM LLP

By: /s/

John J. Cotter

Attorneys for Counterdefendant

COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case 3:02-cv-01673-JCS Document 724 Filed 12/05/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. C02-01673 JCS

Dated: December 4, 2006 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/

Karl J. Kramer

Attorneys for Defendants and

Counterclaimants FUJITSU LIMITED,

FUJITSU HITACHI PLASMA 

DISPLAY LIMITED, FUJITSU 

GENERAL LIMITED, FUJITSU 

GENERAL AMERICA, INC., FUJITSU MICROELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: , 2006

____________________________________ Hon. Joseph C. Spero

United States Magistrate Judge

December 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:02-cv-01673-JCS Document 724 Filed 12/05/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. C02-01673 JCS

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures and/or written concurrences for 

any signature indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this electronically filed document.

_____________/s/_______________

Reynaldo C. Barceló

Case 3:02-cv-01673-JCS Document 724 Filed 12/05/06 Page 4 of 4