Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04748/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04748-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

Stipulated Order Continuing CMC Case No. 3:14-cv-04748-TEH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARA E. ROSALES, State Bar No. 104844 

mara@rosaleslawpartners.com

ROBERT D. SANFORD, State Bar No.129790 

dusty@rosaleslawpartners.com

ROSALES LAW PARTNERS LLP 

433 California Street, Suite 630 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 986-4760 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PACIFIC GATEWAY CONCESSIONS LLC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RACHEL HOCHSTETLER, 

CIRENA TORRES, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

PACIFIC GATEWAY CONCESSIONS LLC, et 

al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________

PACIFIC GATEWAY CONCESSIONS LLC, et 

al.,

Cross-Claimant, 

vs.

POINT SOLUTIONS, LLC, 

Cross-Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-04748-TEH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING OR 

VACATING AUGUST 31, 2015

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Date: August 31, 2015 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Courtroom: 12 

Case 3:14-cv-04748-TEH Document 34 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 4
1

Stipulated Order Continuing CMC Case No. 3:14-cv-04748-TEH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION 

Plaintiffs Rachel Hochstetler and Cirena Torres, Defendant and Cross-Claimant 

Pacific Gateway Concessions LLC ("PGC"), and Cross-Defendant Point Solutions, LLC 

("PS") hereby stipulate as follows: 

Recitals 

1. The Initial Case Management Conference in this action has been continued 

three times to allow the parties an opportunity to negotiate settlement. (Docket 24, 29, 

32.) Plaintiffs and PGC reached agreement on settlement of the putative class action, 

which was memorialized in a Memorandum of Understanding of Settlement ("MOU") 

signed on June 8, 2015. Plaintiffs and PGC have since negotiated and executed a detailed 

Stipulated Settlement Agreement and Release ("Class Settlement Agreement"). Pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), Plaintiffs will shortly file a motion seeking the 

Court's preliminary approval of the Class Settlement Agreement. 

2. PGC and PS have reached agreement on the major details of the settlement 

of PGC's cross-claim for indemnity and contribution and for breach of contract. PGC and 

PS anticipate that a formal settlement agreement should be signed shortly, pursuant to 

which PGC's cross-claim would be dismissed in conjunction with the Court's final 

approval of the Class Settlement Agreement. 

3. In the interest of efficient case management and minimizing the burden of 

the action on the Court's resources, the parties agree that the August 31, 2015 Case 

Management Conference should be, at the Court's discretion, either: (i) continued from 

August 31, 2015 for 60 days in order to permit Plaintiffs to file the motion for preliminary 

approval of the Class Settlement Agreement, then vacated once the motion is filed; or (ii) 

vacated now. 

///

///

Case 3:14-cv-04748-TEH Document 34 Filed 08/26/15 Page 2 of 4
2

Stipulated Order Continuing CMC Case No. 3:14-cv-04748-TEH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation

4. Based on the foregoing recitals, the parties stipulate that the Initial Case 

Management Conference of August 31, 2015 should be, at the Court's discretion, either 

continued for 60 days to allow the motion for preliminary approval of the Class Settlement 

Agreement to be filed, then vacated once the motion is filed, or vacated immediately. 

So Stipulated. 

Dated: August 24, 2015 CHANT & COMPANY 

 A Professional Law Corporation 

By: /s/ Chant Yedalian 

CHANT YEDALIAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

RACHEL HOCHSTETLER and CIRENA 

TORRES

Dated: August 24, 2015 ROSALES LAW PARTNERS LLP 

By: /s/ Robert D. Sanford 

ROBERT D. SANFORD 

Attorney for Defendant and Cross-Claimant 

PACIFIC GATEWAY CONCESSIONS LLC 

Dated: August 24, 2015 HUDDLESTON & SIPOS LAW GROUP 

LLP

By: /s/ Robert A. Huddleston 

ROBERT A. HUDDLESTON 

Attorney for Cross- Defendant 

POINT SOLUTIONS, LLC 

Case 3:14-cv-04748-TEH Document 34 Filed 08/26/15 Page 3 of 4
3

Stipulated Order Continuing CMC Case No. 3:14-cv-04748-TEH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 Pursuant to stipulation, it is ordered as follows:

 The Initial Case Management Conference shall occur on _________, 2015 at 

_____ in Courtroom 12 on the 19th floor, United States District Courthouse, 450 Golden 

Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. Not less than seven days prior, counsel shall 

submit a joint case management conference statement, and all other deadlines are 

continued according to the new date of the Initial Case Management Conference. Once 

Plaintiffs file a motion for preliminary approval of the Class Settlement Agreement, the 

Initial Case Management Conference shall be vacated. 

 [OR] 

 The August 31, 2015 Initial Case Management Conference is vacated pending 

Plaintiffs' filing of a motion for preliminary approval of the Class Settlement Agreement. 

Dated: August ___, 2015 

 _________________________________ 

 Honorable Thelton E. Henderson 

 United States District Court Judge 

10/26

1:30 PM

25

Case 3:14-cv-04748-TEH Document 34 Filed 08/26/15 Page 4 of 4