Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02479/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02479-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 10cv2479 BTM(WVG)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRACE L. SANDOVAL,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 10cv2479 BTM(WVG)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AS

MOOT; AND DISMISSING

COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

v.

SECURITY OFFICER TRAINING

CENTER,

Defendant.

Plaintiff Grace L. Sandoval, proceeding pro se, has filed a Complaint, along with a

Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), and a Request for Appointment Counsel.

Based on the information provided by Plaintiff, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court

GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP motion. The Court is obligated to review a complaint filed IFP sua

sponte and must dismiss the action if it determines that the complaint is frivolous, malicious,

or fails to state a claim for relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). After careful review, the Court

finds that Plaintiff’s complaint is frivolous and void of any plausible claims for relief. The

Complaint is but one in a series of frivolous complaints filed by Plaintiff. Because “it is

absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment,” the

Court DISMISSES the complaint WITH PREJUDICE. Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221,

1228 n.9 (9th Cir. 1984). As such, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s Request for

Appointment of Counsel. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 6, 2010

Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-02479-BTM-WVG Document 5 Filed 12/07/10 Page 1 of 1