Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00636/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00636-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 690
Nature of Suit: Other Forfeiture and Penalty Suits
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 725 

MAIN STREET, MARTINEZ, 

CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 

APN: 373-192-007-4, INCLUDING 

ALL APPURTENANCES AND 

IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, ET AL.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:19-CV-00247 JAM-DB

RELATED CASE ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RYAN GUIDRY,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:20-CR-00003 KJM

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH BAYLISS and RONALD ROACH,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:19-CV-02140 JAM-DB

Case 2:19-cv-00636-DAD-DB Document 61 Filed 01/09/20 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT A. KARMANN,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:19-CV-02531 JAM-DB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

APPROXIMATELY $6,567,897.50 

SEIZED FROM CTBC BANK, ACCOUNT 

NUMBER 3800191916, ET AL.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:19-CV-00485 JAM-DB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

5383 STONEHURST DRIVE, MARTINEZ, 

CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 

APN: 367-230-018-7, INCLUDING 

ALL APPURTENANCES AND 

IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, ET AL.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:19-CV-00636 JAM-DB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RONALD J. ROACH and JOSEPH W. 

BAYLISS,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:19-CR-00182 JAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT A. KARMANN,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:19-CR-00222 JAM

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these 

Case 2:19-cv-00636-DAD-DB Document 61 Filed 01/09/20 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 

2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same 

judge and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial 

savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for 

the parties.

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under 

Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are 

assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation 

of the actions is effected. Under the regular practice of this 

court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and 

magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated 

2:20-CR-00003 KJM be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez for all 

further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned 

case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents 

filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:20-CR-00003 JAM.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make 

appropriate adjustment in the assignment of criminal cases to 

compensate for this reassignment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 9, 2020

/s/ John A. Mendez________________

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:19-cv-00636-DAD-DB Document 61 Filed 01/09/20 Page 3 of 3