Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-01402/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-01402-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOHNNIE L. COCHRAN, JR. (SBN 33334) 

BRIAN T. DUNN (SBN 176502) 

COCHRAN, CHERRY, GIVENS, SMITH & STEWART 

4929 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1010 

Los Angeles, California 90010-3856 

Telephone: (323) 931-6200; Fax: (323) 931-9521 

Attorneys for all Plaintiffs 

MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114) 

JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268) 

HADDAD & SHERWIN 

505 Seventeenth Street 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 452-5500; Fax: (510) 452-5510 

Co-counsel for all Plaintiffs 

EDWIN J. WILSON, JR. (State Bar No. 48881) 

TODD BOLEY (State Bar No. 68119) 

ERICKSON, BEASLEY, HEWITT & WILSON 

483 Ninth Street, Suite 200 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Tel: (510) 839-3448; Fax: (510) 839-1622 

Attorneys for all Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KELY WILKINS, Individually and as 

Successor in Interest to Decedent 

WILLIAM ALBERTO WILKINS, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

 

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. C 01-01402 MMC 

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING 

DATE AND COORDINATE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO BIFURCATE 

No. C 01-01402 MMC: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE AND 

COORDINATE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO BIFURCATE 1

Case 3:01-cv-01402-MMC Document 133 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

All parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the 

following: 

Defendants’ Motion to Bifurcate Trial, currently scheduled for hearing on February 

3, 2006, was calendared by Defendants without consultation with Plaintiffs’ counsel. Due 

to the previously scheduled vacation plans of Plaintiffs’ counsel, Michael Haddad and Julia 

Sherwin, the parties agree to continue the hearing date for the motion to bifurcate by one 

week, to February 10, 2006, with the briefing schedule to conform to the new hearing date. 

COCHRAN, CHERRY, GIVENS, & SMITH 

/s/___________________________ Dated:January 11, 2006 

BRIAN T. DUNN 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

HADDAD & SHERWIN 

/s/___________________________ Dated: January 11, 2006 

MICHAEL J. HADDAD 

Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs 

ERICKSON, BEASLEY, HEWITT & WILSON 

/s/___________________________ Dated: January 11, 2006 

TODD BOLEY 

Attorneys for Defendants 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. Dated: January 11, 2006. 

 /s/ 

 MICHAEL J. HADDAD 

No. C 01-01402 MMC: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE AND 

COORDINATE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO BIFURCATE 2

Case 3:01-cv-01402-MMC Document 133 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

THIS COURT, having considered the above stipulation, and finding good cause 

therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the hearing date for Defendants’ Motion to 

Bifurcate Trial is continued to February 10, 2006, with the briefing schedule under the Civil 

Local Rules to conform to the new hearing date. 

BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

_______________ ____________________________ 

DATE HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

No. C 01-01402 MMC: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE AND 

COORDINATE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO BIFURCATE 3

January 12, 2006

Case 3:01-cv-01402-MMC Document 133 Filed 01/12/06 Page 3 of 3