Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01827/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01827-1067/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

ROBINS 

KAPLAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

MINNEAPOLIS

Case No. 3:07-MD-1827 SI 

86802799.1 

AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR 

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] 

JUDGMENT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 

Roman M. Silberfeld, Bar No. 62783 

RSilberfeld@robinskaplan.com 

Bernice Conn, Bar No. 161594 

BConn@robinskaplan.com 

Michael A. Geibelson, Bar No. 179970 

MGeibelson@robinskaplan.com 

David Martinez, Bar No. 193183 

DMartinez@robinskaplan.com 

2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208 

Telephone: (310) 552-0130 

Facsimile: (310) 229-5800 

Attorneys For Plaintiffs Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy 

Purchasing LLC; Best Buy Enterprise Services, 

Inc.; Best Buy Stores, L.P.; BestBuy.com, L.L.C.; 

and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

Best Buy Co., Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp., et al., 

Case No. 10-CV-4572 SI 

Master File No. 07-MD-1827 SI

MDL No. 1827 

Individual Cases: 

Case No. 10-CV-4572 

AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND 

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

The Honorable Susan Illston 

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT AND ALL INTERESTED PERSONS AND 

PARTIES: 

WHEREAS the Best Buy Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Motion for Fees and Costs on 

September 18, 2013 (Dkt. 595 in Case No. 10-CV-4572; and its related papers Dkt. 594; Dkt. 

Nos. 8610, 8612 in Case No. 07-MD-1827 SI); 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 9538 Filed 06/06/16 Page 1 of 2
ROBINS 

KAPLAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

MINNEAPOLIS

Case No. 3:07-MD-1827 SI 

86802799.1 - 2 - 

AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR 

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] 

JUDGMENT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS the Court referred the matter for determination by the Special Master in the 

first instance (Dkt. 651 in Case No. 10-CV-4572); 

WHEREAS the Special Master concluded that the Best Buy Plaintiffs should be awarded 

$1.75 million in attorneys’ fees and $104,167.97 in costs; 

WHEREAS the Court adopted the Special Master’s recommendations in full and ordered 

that the Best Buy Plaintiffs should be awarded $1.75 million in attorneys’ fees and $104,167.97 

in costs (Dkt. 685 in Case No. 10-CV-4572); 

WHEREAS this award of attorneys’ fees and costs was affirmed by the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Dkt. 697 in Case No. 10-CV-4572); 

WHEREAS the Mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 

issued on March 28, 2016 (Dkt. 701 in Case No. 10-CV-4572); and 

WHEREAS the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted the Best Buy 

Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees on appeal, awarded the Best Buy Plaintiffs an 

additional $182,843.25 in attorneys’ fees, and amended its Mandate (April 25, 2016 Order [Dkt. 

62] in Ninth Circuit Case Nos. 13-17408, 13-17618); 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 

JUDGMENT shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy 

Purchasing LLC; Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.; Best Buy Stores, L.P.; Bestbuy.com, L.L.C.; 

and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc., and against Defendant HannStar Display Corporation, that the Best Buy 

Plaintiffs are entitled to recover attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $2,037,011.22. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: _______________, 2016 By: ______________ 

The Honorable Susan Illston 

Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 9538 Filed 06/06/16 Page 2 of 2