Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02774/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02774-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

\ 

PtLltb 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSUoited Statet to~rc ~f Appeals Tenth Cm:mt 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT APR .. 4 1990 

RICHARD RALPH MARTINEZ, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v. 

JUDGE HENSLEY, 9th Judicial 

District Court; CLERK, 9th Judicial 

District Court; ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

STATE OF NEW MEXICO; CALVIN NEUMAN, 

Public Defenders Office, in their 

official and individual capacity, 

Respondents-Appellees. 

.ROBERT L. HOECKER 

) Clerk 

) 

) 

) 

) No. 88-2774 

) (D.C. No. 88-1156-M) 

) (D. N.M.) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

LOGAN, MOORE, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

The issue in this case is exactly the same as that disposed 

of in Martinez v. State of New Mexico, No. 89-2123 (10th Cir. 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 88-2774 Document: 01019970791 Date Filed: 04/04/1990 Page: 1 
I 

\ 

Mar. 20, 1989), in which plaintiff claimed his constitutional 

rights were violated by the state's refusal to provide him a free 

copy of his trial transcript. 

On the basis of our order and judgment in No. 89-2123, the 

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

Appellate Case: 88-2774 Document: 01019970791 Date Filed: 04/04/1990 Page: 2