Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01799/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01799-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONIQUE MILES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C-15-1799 MMC

ORDER DENYING PARTIES’ REQUEST

TO ENTER CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

AS TO DEFENDANT CITY OF

OAKLAND; VACATING CONDITIONAL

DISMISSAL AS TO SAN LEANDRO

DEFENDANTS

Before the Court is the parties’ “Stipulated Notice of Settlement Between Plaintiffs

and City of Oakland, and Request for Order of Conditional Dismissal,” filed March 10, 2016,

in which the parties request the Court enter a conditional dismissal of the City of Oakland,

the only defendant remaining in the case. 

In light of the parties’ anticipated filing of a motion for a minors’ compromise, the

Court finds it appropriate to defer entry of such dispositive order until said motion has been

resolved, and, accordingly, the parties’ request for a conditional dismissal is hereby

DENIED without prejudice. For the same reasons, the Court finds it appropriate to vacate

its Order of Conditional Dismissal, filed January 4, 2016, as to the San Leandro

defendants, and said order is hereby VACATED pending resolution of the anticipated

motion for a minor’s compromise as to said defendants. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 14, 2016 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01799-MMC Document 61 Filed 03/14/16 Page 1 of 1