Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_97-cv-00152/USCOURTS-caed-2_97-cv-00152-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LANCE IAN OSBAND,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-97-0152 WBS KJM

vs. DEATH PENALTY CASE

STEVEN W. ORNOSKI, 

 Acting Warden of San Quentin 

 State Prison, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

The parties have submitted a joint statement regarding pre-evidentiary hearing

matters. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The February 6, 2006 scheduling order is modified as follows:

a. By May 10, 2006, the parties shall file a joint statement outlining

all agreements on the submission of documents under Rule 7. 

b. Also by May 10, the parties shall file briefs regarding any

disagreements set out in the March 16 joint statement. Those

briefs shall include the parties’ positions on: (i) the submission of

documents under Rule 7, (ii) the taking of witness testimony by

declaration or deposition in lieu of in-court testimony, 

(iii) respondent’s obligation to provide petitioner with discovery, 

Case 2:97-cv-00152-KJM-CSK Document 249 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and (iv) any other disagreements between the parties regarding

preparation for the evidentiary hearing. The parties shall file

responsive briefs by May 17 and any reply briefs by May 24, 2006. 

On June 7, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. the undersigned will hold a hearing

on these disputes in courtroom # 26.

2. Petitioner requests shortening the time by which respondent must provide

exhibit and witness lists and a summary of lay witness testimony. 

Petitioner provides no reasons for this request. It is denied.

3. By May 24, 2006, the parties shall submit a joint statement suggesting any

agreed-upon changes to the protective order or describing any

disagreements regarding changes to the protective order. The parties shall

be prepared to discuss issues involving the protective order at the June 7

hearing. 

DATED: March 20, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

osbandpreevi.or

Case 2:97-cv-00152-KJM-CSK Document 249 Filed 03/21/06 Page 2 of 2