Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03774/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03774-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:15-cv-03774-EMC

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION BRIEFING

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099

tboutrous@gibsondunn.com

THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570

tevangelis@gibsondunn.com

333 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197

Telephone: 213.229.7000

Facsimile: 213.229.7520

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557

jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921

Telephone: 415.393.8200

Facsimile: 415.393.8306

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and 

RASIER-CA LLC 

CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER (SBN 197117)

chamner@hamnerlaw.com

AMY T. WOOTTON (SBN 188856)

awootton@hamnerlaw.com

EVELINA SERAFINI (SBN 187137)

eserafini@hamnerlaw.com

HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC

555 W. 5th Street, 31st Floor

Los Angeles, California 90013

Telephone: (213) 533-4160

Facsimile: (213) 533-4167

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GREG FISHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREG FISHER, on behalf of himself and 

the proposed collective class,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, RASIER-CA LLC, 

a Delaware Limited Liability Company, 

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03774-EMC

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO 

COMPEL ARBITRATION BRIEFING

Case 3:15-cv-03774-EMC Document 30 Filed 10/30/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Pursuant to Rule 6-1(b) of the Local Rules of the United States District for the Northern 

District of California, Plaintiff GREG FISHER (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants UBER 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER-CA, LLC (“Defendants”) (collectively, “the Parties”), 

through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that the deadline for Plaintiff’s

Response to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration be extended from October 28, 2015 to 

November 11, 2015 and the deadline for Defendants’ Reply extended from November 4 to 

November 23 in order to provide Plaintiffs adequate time to prepare a Response to Defendants’ 

Motion to Compel Arbitration and to provide Defendants with adequate time to prepare a Reply in 

support of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration. 

There has been no previous request to extend the timing for the deadlines associated with 

Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration. This stipulation will not require the alteration of the 

hearing date already set by Court Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: October 30, 2015 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By: /s/

Joshua S. Lipshutz

Attorneys for Defendants UBER 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER-CA LLC

Dated: October 30, 2015 HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC

By: /s/

Christopher J. Hamner

Attorneys for Plaintiff GREG FISHER 

Case 3:15-cv-03774-EMC Document 30 Filed 10/30/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2.

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, I, Christopher J. Hamner hereby attest that concurrence in 

the filing of this document has been obtained from Joshua S. Lipshutz.

DATED: October 29, 2015 HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC 

By: /s/

Christopher J. Hamner

Attorneys for Plaintiff GREG FISHER 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: ________________________________ ______________________________________

HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

The hearing on the motion to compel is rescheduled from 12/7/15 to 

12/10/15 at 1:30 p.m. 10/30/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-03774-EMC Document 30 Filed 10/30/15 Page 3 of 3