Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05998/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05998-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 )

JOHN KING, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CAPTAIN SEDELY, et al., )

) 

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 04-5998 AWI DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM-285 FORMS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro per and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. Pending before the Court is the amended complaint, filed July

22, 2004. The complaint appears to state a cognizable claim for failure to protect plaintiff from

risk of serious harm in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for defendants Sedely, Diego, Padilla and Butts.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff four (4) USM-285 forms, four (4)

summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the complaint filed July 22, 2004.

3. Within TWENTY (20) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

Case 1:04-cv-05998-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

Court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Five (5) copies of the endorsed complaint filed July 22, 2004.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendant and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 5, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05998-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 10/05/06 Page 2 of 2