Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-02349/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-02349-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 245
Nature of Suit: Real Property Product Liability
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DONNELL BLEDSOE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GUILIANI, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:19-cv-02349-TLN-CKD PS 

ORDER & FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s complaint was filed with 

the court on November 20, 2019. The court’s records reveal that on October 5, 2018, plaintiff 

filed a complaint containing virtually identical allegations. (2:18-cv-02710-KJN).1

 Due to the 

duplicative nature of the present action, the court will vacate its order directing the United States 

Marshal to serve the first amended complaint and recommend that the complaint be dismissed. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the order directing service (ECF No. 8) 

is VACATED; and (2) the Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on the United States 

Marshal, 501 “I” Street, Sacramento, Ca., 95814, Tel. No. (916) 930-2030. 

 Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 

1

 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 

500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980). 

Case 2:19-cv-02349-TLN-CKD Document 9 Filed 01/24/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the District Judge assigned to this 

case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served 

with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. 

The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991). 

Dated: January 24, 2020 

15 bledsoe2349.f&r.dismiss

Case 2:19-cv-02349-TLN-CKD Document 9 Filed 01/24/20 Page 2 of 2