Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-00911/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-00911-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 06cv0911

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOUSTON ALVIS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 06 CV 0911 JM (WMc)

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

RECONSIDER JUNE 3, 2008

ORDER

(Doc. No. 72)

vs.

CITY OF OCEANSIDE, et al.,

Defendants.

On June 3, 2008, the court denied the parties’ joint motion to continue the deadline for filing

motions for summary judgment. Defendant now moves ex parte for reconsideration of that order.

Defendant represents that Plaintiff’s counsel does not oppose this request. The court finds that

Defendant fails to demonstrate good cause for the court at this time to modify or vacate its June 3,

2008 order. The court therefore DENIES the motion for reconsideration.

The motion cutoff date remains June 11, 2008. Thus, any party seeking to move for summary

judgment must have secured a motion hearing date of June 11, 2008, or earlier. Under the current

scheduling order, the parties can no longer secure a timely motion hearing date. The denial of the 

//

//

//

//

Case 3:06-cv-00911-JM-WMC Document 73 Filed 06/05/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 06cv0911

motion for reconsideration is without prejudice to a future application, predicated upon good cause,

to bring a specific motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 5, 2008

 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller

 United States District Judge

cc: All parties

Case 3:06-cv-00911-JM-WMC Document 73 Filed 06/05/08 Page 2 of 2