Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04018/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04018-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

LOCAL RULE 6-1(B) STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

LACA_801941.1 

John P. Bovich (SBN 150688) 

William R. Overend (SBN 180209) 

REED SMITH LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3922 

Telephone: 415.543.8700 

Facsimile: 415.391.8269 

William H. Manning (pro hac vice) 

Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) 

Eric S. Jackson (pro hac vice) 

Jacob S. Zimmerman (pro hac vice) 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 

2800 LaSalle Plaza, 800 LaSalle Avenue 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 

Telephone: 612.349.8500 

Facsimile: 612.339.4181 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company 

John J. Feldhaus (pro hac vice) 

Stephen M. Lobbin (SBN 181195) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

1530 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125 

Telephone: 650.856.3700 

Facsimile: 650.856.3710 

Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information 

Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Business 

Solutions, Inc. and Toshiba TEC America Retail Information Systems, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INTERGRAPH HARDWARE 

TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, a Nevada corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, a Japanese 

corporation, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

UNDER CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(B) AND 6-2

EXTENDING PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-4 AND

4-5(A) DEADLINES BY ONE DAY 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 78 Filed 04/25/07 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

LOCAL RULE 6-1(B) STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

LACA_801941.1 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule (N.D. Cal.) 6-1(a), by and between the parties—Plaintiff Intergraph 

Hardware Technologies Company (“Intergraph”) and Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba 

America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Business 

Solutions, Inc. and Toshiba TEC America Retail Information Systems, Inc. (collectively “Toshiba”)—IT 

IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 

1. This Court’s December 4, 2006 Order following the Case Management Conference set 

the following dates related to discovery and briefing on claim construction issues: 

 Claim Construction Discovery Cutoff Under PLR 4-4: April 26, 2007 

 Intergraph’s Claim Construction Brief Under PLR 4-5(a): May 11, 2007 

 Toshiba’s Claim Construction Brief Under PLR 4-5(b): May 25, 2007 

 Intergraph’s Reply Claim Construction Brief Under PLR 4-5(c): June 1, 2007 

2. Due to scheduling conflicts and in order to accommodate the convenience of the parties 

and witnesses, Intergraph has agreed to take the deposition of Toshiba’s expert witness on claim 

construction issues on April 27, 2007 (one day past the Claim Construction Discovery Cutoff date) in 

Washington, D.C. Toshiba has agreed that Intergraph’s opening Claim Construction Brief Under PLR 

4-5(a), currently due by Friday, May 11, 2007, shall instead be due by Monday, May 14, 2007, which is 

the next court day. 

3. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(1)-(3), this stipulated request is accompanied by the 

attached declaration setting forth (1) the reasons for the requested extension; (2) all previous time 

modifications in the case; and (3) the effect of the requested extension. No other dates set by this 

Court’s December 4, 2006 Order following the Case Management Conference require modification, nor 

does this stipulated extension alter any other deadline already fixed by the Court. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 78 Filed 04/25/07 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

LOCAL RULE 6-1(B) STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

LACA_801941.1 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: April 23, 2007 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP

/s/ Brad P. Engdahl 

William H. Manning (pro hac vice) 

Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 

2800 LaSalle Plaza, 800 LaSalle Avenue 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 

Telephone: 612.349.8500 

Facsimile: 612.339.4181 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Intergraph Hardware 

Technologies Company 

Dated: April 23, 2007 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

/s/ Stephen M. Lobbin 

John J. Feldhaus (pro hac vice) 

Stephen M. Lobbin (State Bar No. 181195) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

1530 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125 

Telephone: 650.856.3700 

Facsimile: 650.856.3710 

Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba 

America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America 

Medical Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Business 

Solutions, Inc. and Toshiba TEC America Retail 

Information Systems, Inc. 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________, 2007 ______________________________________________

Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

United States District Judge

April 25

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 78 Filed 04/25/07 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4 

LOCAL RULE 6-1(B) STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

LACA_801941.1 

I, Stephen M. Lobbin, declare and state as follows: 

1. I am an attorney with Foley & Lardner LLP, counsel for the Toshiba Defendants in the 

above-captioned action. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth below, and if called upon I 

could and would testify competently thereto. 

2. The reasons for the requested extension are stated in Paragraph 2 of the Stipulation 

herein, that is, “Due to scheduling conflicts and in order to accommodate the convenience of the parties 

and witnesses, Intergraph has agreed to take the deposition of Toshiba’s expert witness on claim 

construction issues on April 27, 2007 (one day past the Claim Construction Discovery Cutoff date) in 

Washington, D.C. Toshiba has agreed that Intergraph’s opening Claim Construction Brief Under PLR 

4-5(a), currently due by Friday, May 11, 2007, shall instead be due by Monday, May 14, 2007, which is 

the next court day.” 

3. No previous time modifications have been sought or entered in this case which have 

altered any date set by this Court’s December 4, 2006 Order following the Case Management 

Conference, or any other deadline already fixed by the Court. Other time modifications have been 

entered, for example, extending the time for Plaintiff to respond reply to the Defendants’ counterclaims, 

and extending the time for certain exchanges between the parties under this Court’s Patent Local Rules. 

4. The effect of the requested extension is only that, as stated herein, this Court’s Claim 

Construction Discovery Cutoff date of April 26, 2007 would be extended by one day to accommodate 

one deposition, and Intergraph’s opening Claim Construction Brief Under PLR 4-5(a), currently due by 

Friday, May 11, 2007, instead would be due by Monday, May 14, 2007, which is the next court day. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

Executed on this 23rd day of April, 2007 at Los Angeles, California. 

/s/ Stephen M. Lobbin 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 78 Filed 04/25/07 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

5 

LOCAL RULE 6-1(B) STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

LACA_801941.1 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that under General Order (N.D. Cal.) 45.X.B, concurrence in the filing of the 

foregoing document: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER UNDER CIVIL LOCAL RULE

6-1(B) AND 6-2 EXTENDING PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-4 AND 4-5(A) DEADLINES BY ONE

DAY has been obtained from each signatory thereto, and that on April 24, 2007 I filed this document via 

ECF and thus served it under General Order (N.D. Cal.) 45.IX.A on the following parties: 

William H. Manning 

Brad P. Engdahl 

Eric S. Jackson 

Jacob S. Zimmerman 

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP 

2800 LaSalle Plaza, 800 LaSalle Avenue 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 

John P. Bovich 

William R. Overend 

Reed Smith LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

/s/ Stephen M. Lobbin 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 78 Filed 04/25/07 Page 5 of 5