Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01006/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01006-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07cv1006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT GARCIA,

Petitioner,

v.

JIMMY WALKER,

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 07-CV-1006-L(JMA)

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR STAY AND

ABEYANCE [doc. #5]; CASE TO

REMAIN CLOSED

Petitioner filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus on June 1, 2007. On June 8, 2007,

the Court dismissed the petition without prejudice for failure to pay the $5 filing fee or move to

proceed in forma pauperis. [doc. #2]. Thereafter, petitioner attempted to file a motion for stay

and abeyance of the claims [doc. #3] but the motion was rejected because the petitioner did not

comply with the Court’s June 8, 2007 Order. The July 30, 2007 Notice of Document

Discrepancy also note that compliance with the June 8, 2007 Order was required to reinstate the

action.

On September 14, 2007, petitioner filed a “corrected motion for stay and abeyance.) [doc.

#5]. The Court accepted the document even though there were discrepancies noted. Having

reviewed the file; however, the Court notes petitioner has not yet complied with the Court’s June

8, 2007 Order: “IN ORDER TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION PETITIONER MUST

NO LATER THAN AUGUST 6, 2007, (1) SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDER WITH

Case 3:07-cv-01006-L-JMA Document 6 Filed 09/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 07cv1006

THE $5 FEE OR WITH ADEQUATE PROOF OF HIS INABILITY TO PAY THE FEE; .

. .”

(Order filed June 8, 2007). 

Because petitioner has not paid the $5 fee or provided adequate proof of his inability to

pay the fee within the time provided in the Court’s Order, petitioner’s “corrected motion for stay

and abeyance” is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND AS MOOT for failure to comply

with the Court’s prior Order. This case remains closed pursuant to the Court’s Order of June 8,

2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 26, 2007

M. James Lorenz

United States District Court Judge

COPY TO: 

HON. JAN M. ADLER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ALL PARTIES/COUNSEL

Case 3:07-cv-01006-L-JMA Document 6 Filed 09/26/07 Page 2 of 2