Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05078/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05078-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIBROM MOSAZGI, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

JOHN ASHCROFT, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:04-cv-05078 AWI TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION GRANTING MOTION

TO DISMISS FOR MOOTNESS

(Doc. 25)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is detained by the United States Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement

("ICE") and is proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On February 28, 2005, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be granted and the petition

for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED as moot because Petitioner was no longer in ICE custody. 

(Doc. 25). The Report and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. Petitioner's

copy of the Report and Recommendation was returned to the Court as "undeliverable" on March 14,

2005, with a stamp indicating "Not in Custody." (Doc. 26). Neither party has filed objections to the

Case 1:04-cv-05078-AWI-TAG Document 27 Filed 04/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation issued February 28, 2005, (Doc. 25) is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is Dismissed; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05078-AWI-TAG Document 27 Filed 04/21/05 Page 2 of 2