Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00949/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00949-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EL DORADO IRRIGATION DISTRICT,

a political subdivision of the

State of California,

NO. CIV. S-03-949 LKK/GGH

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

TRAYLOR BROS., INC., an 

Indiana corporation,

Defendant.

 /

AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIMS.

 /

On June 12, 2006 a Pretrial Conference was scheduled in the

above-captioned case. The court could not conduct a full Pretrial

Conference given a number of complications raised by both parties.

Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows:

1. The following dates are SET for the motions in limine and

Daubert hearing:

Motions in limine due: July 31, 2006.

Case 2:03-cv-00949-LKK -GGH Document 441 Filed 06/15/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The court also requests that the parties bring a copy of the

new joint statements and lists on cd or disc. 

2

Oppositions to the motions in limine due: August 14, 2006.

Reply briefs due: August 21, 2006.

Hearing on the motions in limine and the Daubert hearing:

September 5, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 4.

2. Given the scheduling of the motions in limine, the trial

date originally set for September 12, 2006 is CONTINUED to

September 19, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. Trial will be by jury and parties

estimate that trial should take approximately twenty-five (25)

days.

3. Plaintiff has requested a separate hearing on contract

interpretation. Plaintiff shall file an offer of proof on June 19,

2006. Defendants shall file a responsive offer of proof on June

26, 2006. The offers of proof must be no longer than ten (10)

pages and must set forth what the hearing would encompass. The

offer of proof must also include a list of witnesses and a brief

summary of what the witnesses will say. 

4. The court will conduct a full Pretrial Conference on June

23, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. At that time, the parties are instructed

to file with the court and bring a paper copy of the following:1

(a) A revised joint statement of the undisputed facts. This

statement will be read to the jury.

(b) One joint list of all the exhibits and one joint list of

all witnesses that both parties intend to rely on in their case in

chief. The parties should indicate on these lists whether or not

Case 2:03-cv-00949-LKK -GGH Document 441 Filed 06/15/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

there is an objection to the exhibit, which party raises the

objection and the grounds for the objection. The court will mark

into evidence the exhibits to which no objection is raised and will

mark for identification only those exhibits to which an objection

has been raised. 

(c) One joint list of all the exhibits and one joint list of

all the witnesses that both parties intend to use in rebuttal. The

parties should indicate on this list whether or not there is an

objection to the exhibit, which party raises the objection and the

grounds for the objection. The court will rule upon the

admissibility of these exhibits at the time they are tendered. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 13, 2006.

Case 2:03-cv-00949-LKK -GGH Document 441 Filed 06/15/06 Page 3 of 3