Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-02120/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-02120-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANITY.COM, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

VANITY SHOP OF GRAND FORKS, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 12-2912 SI

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

On August 2, 2012, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for lack of personal

jurisdiction, or in the alternative, to transfer venue. Dkt. 7. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for

September 14, 2012. Pursuant to Civ. L. R. 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition was due on August 16, 2012. On

August 16, 2012, rather than filing an opposition, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. Defendant has

informed the Court via telephone message that its motion to dismiss is unaffected by the Amended

Complaint and that it wants its motion heard as scheduled. 

The Court considers the Amended Complaint the operative complaint in this case. As defendant

has informed the Court that its currently filed motion to dismiss applies to the Amended Complaint, the

hearing will remain on as scheduled. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss no later

than August 24, 2012. A reply shall be filed by August 31, 2012. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 17, 2012 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 2:12-cv-02120-JAT Document 16 Filed 08/17/12 Page 1 of 1