Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01441/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01441-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL STEVEN DIXON,

Plaintiff,

v.

S. LaROSA,

Defendant.

No. 2:10-cv-1441 TLN KJN P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 19, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The findings and

recommendations were adopted in full on March 31, 2014, and judgment was entered. 

Plaintiff sought reconsideration, and by order filed January 29, 2015, the action was 

reopened for the limited purpose of allowing plaintiff to file objections to the findings and 

recommendations. After receiving an extension of time, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings 

and recommendations on February 27, 2015. On March 13, 2015, Defendant filed a reply.

////

Case 2:10-cv-01441-TLN-KJN Document 141 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 19, 2014, are adopted in full; 

2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 108) is granted; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2015

Case 2:10-cv-01441-TLN-KJN Document 141 Filed 03/27/15 Page 2 of 2