Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-03415/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-03415-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Fibertrek, Inc., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

Preferred Corporate Services, Inc., et al.,

Defendants. /

NO. C 08-03415 JW 

ORDER VACATING PRELIMINARY

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE;

MAINTAINING HEARING ON ORDER

TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT

ON MARCH 29 CALENDAR

This case is scheduled for a hearing on an Order to Show Cause Re: Settlement and a

Preliminary Pretrial Conference as to a non-settling Defendant on March 29, 2010. The settling

parties were required to file a Stipulated Dismissal or Joint Statement on or before March 19, 2010,

but to date, have failed to do so. (See Order Continuing Order to Show Cause Re: Settlement and

Preliminary Pretrial Conference, hereafter, “OSC Re: Settlement,” Docket Item No. 84.) In its OSC

Re: Settlement, the Court made clear that the parties would be granted no further continuances, and

that failure to comply with the Order may result in sanctions. (Id.)

Although the parties failed to file a Stipulated Dismissal or Joint Statement as ordered,

Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Substitute Personal Representative of Defendant Douglas Gregg,

Deceased on March 19, 2010. (hereafter, “Motion,” Docket Item No. 87.) Finding good cause, the

Court VACATES the Preliminary Pretrial Conference as to the non-settling Defendant pending the

Court’s consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion. 

However, in light of the parties’ failure to file a Stipulated Dismissal or Joint Statement to

update the Court on the progress of their settlement, the settling parties shall appear on March 29,

Case 5:08-cv-03415-JW Document 90 Filed 03/25/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

2010 at 9 a.m. to show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 41(b). 

Dated: March 25, 2010 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:08-cv-03415-JW Document 90 Filed 03/25/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Brian Michael Affrunti baffrunti@bwslaw.com

Claudia Carolina Bohorquez ccblaw@aol.com

Douglas W. Dal Cielo ddalcielo@bwslaw.com

Robert John Huston bob_huston@yahoo.com

Dated: March 25, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: /s/ JW Chambers 

Elizabeth Garcia

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:08-cv-03415-JW Document 90 Filed 03/25/10 Page 3 of 3