Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01788/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01788-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

In the United States District Court 

For the District of Arizona

Park and Company Marketing )

Communications, Inc., Aka Park & Co, an )

Arizona Corporation, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

Godec, Randall & Associates, Inc., an )

Arizona Corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

________________________________________)

Case No. CV 07-1788-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel (Doc. 6) for

Plaintiffs wherein they notify the Court that “the firm of Roshka, DeWulf & Patten, PLC,

by and through John E. DeWulf and Darlene M. Wauro, be and are substituted in place and

stead of Andrew Abraham and Ralph D. Harris of the firm of Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A., as

attorneys for Plaintiff Park and Company Marketing Communications, Inc., aka Park&Co.,

an Arizona corporation.”

However, according to the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the

District of Arizona, 

(b) Withdrawal and Substitution. No attorney shall be permitted to withdraw

or be substituted as attorney of record in any pending action except by formal

written order of the Court, supported by written application setting forth the

reasons therefor together with the name, last known residence and last known

telephone number of the client, as follows:

(1) Where such application bears the written approval of the client, it shall be

accompanied by a proposed written order and may be presented to the Court

ex parte. The withdrawing attorney shall give prompt notice of the entry of

Case 2:07-cv-01788-SMM Document 12 Filed 10/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

such order, together with the name, last known residence and last known

telephone number of the client, to all other parties or their attorneys.

(2) Where such application does not bear the written approval of the client, it

shall be made by motion and shall be served upon the client and all other

parties or their attorneys. The motion shall be accompanied by a certificate of

the attorney making the motion that (A) the client has been notified in writing

of the status of the case including the dates and times of any court hearings or

trial settings, pending compliance with any existing court orders and the

possibility of sanctions, or (B) the client cannot be located or for whatever

other reason cannot be notified of the pendency of the motion and the status

of the case. LRCiv 83.3(b)

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file the appropriate documents with

the Court pursuant to LRCiv 83.3(b) to request an Order ensuring that Andrew Abraham and

Ralph D. Harris of the firm of Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A., are properly withdrawn and the

firm of Roshka, DeWulf & Patten, PLC, by and through John E. DeWulf and Darlene M.

Wauro, are properly substituted as new counsel.

DATED this 9th day of October, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-01788-SMM Document 12 Filed 10/09/07 Page 2 of 2