Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00281/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00281-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY JOSEPH CASTILLO, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

M. S. EVANS, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-00281-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 19)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 14)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On January 18, 2008, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as successive. 

(Doc. 14). On July 8, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as

successive. (Doc. 19). This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service

of that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and

Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

Case 1:06-cv-00281-OWW -TAG Document 20 Filed 08/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed July 8, 2008 (Doc. 19), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED as successive;

and,

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 15, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00281-OWW -TAG Document 20 Filed 08/15/08 Page 2 of 2