Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05241/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05241-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 

94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQ FOR ORDER 

CHANGING TIME/CONSOLIDATING 

BRIEFING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05241 EMC

JOHN C. FISH, Jr., Bar No. 160620

jfish@littler.com

ROD M. FLIEGEL, Bar No. 168289

rfliegel@littler.com

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998

aspurchise@littler.com

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street, 20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

Telephone: 415.433.1940

Fax No.: 415.399.8490

Attorneys for Defendant

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD GILLETTE, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly-situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a 

California corporation; and DOES 1-20, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:14-cv-05241 EMC 

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER 

CHANGING TIME AND 

CONSOLIDATING MOTION TO 

COMPEL ARBITRATION BRIEFING; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING 

TIME AND CONSOLIDATING MOTION 

TO COMPEL ARBITRATION BRIEFING

Trial Date: None set.

Complaint Filed: November 26, 2014

Amended Complaint Filed: December 15, 2014

Case 3:14-cv-05241-EMC Document 20 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 5
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 

94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQ FOR ORDER 

CHANGING TIME/CONSOLIDATING 

BRIEFING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05241 EMC

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and 

Rasier, LLC1 through their counsel of record Littler Mendelson, P.C., Plaintiff Ronald Gillette, 

through his counsel of record Goldstein, Borgen, Dardarian & Ho and Plaintiff Abdul Kadir 

Mohamed (Plaintiff in the related action Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 14-

05200-EMC [“Mohamed”]) through his counsel of record Ahdoot & Wolfson, P.C. (collectively “the 

Parties”). Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the Parties hereby stipulate to a consolidated briefing 

schedule regarding Defendants’ motions to compel arbitration in Mohamed and the instant action 

(“Gillette”). The Parties also seek to continue the March 12, 2015 case management conference date 

and associated deadlines. 

This Stipulation is based on the following:

1. Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. filed a motion to compel arbitration in the Gillette 

action on January 23, 2015 and noticed the hearing for March 12, 2015. Plaintiff Gillette’s 

opposition is currently due for filing on February 6, 2015. 

2. Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC intend to file a motion to 

compel arbitration in Mohamed on February 6, 2015. 

3. The Court set a case management conference in Gillette for March 5, 2015, as well as 

associated case management and ADR deadlines, as set forth in the Court’s Order Setting Initial 

Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines. The Court subsequently continued the case 

management conference and associated deadlines to March 12, 2015. 

4. The Court set a case management conference in Mohamed for February 26, 2015, as 

well as associated case management and ADR deadlines, as set forth in the Court’s Order Setting 

Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines. The Court subsequently continued the 

case management conference and associated deadlines to March 12, 2015. 

5. Given the overlap in legal and factual issues in the Gillette and Mohamed actions, the 

Parties met and conferred regarding a consolidated briefing schedule regarding Defendants’ motions 

to compel arbitration. The Parties believe that consolidated briefing, hearing, and initial case 

 1 Rasier, LLC is a defendant only in the related action Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 14-05200-

EMC. 

Case 3:14-cv-05241-EMC Document 20 Filed 02/09/15 Page 2 of 5
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 

94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQ FOR ORDER 

CHANGING TIME/CONSOLIDATING 

BRIEFING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

2. CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05241 EMC

management schedules promote efficiency and will avoid undue repetition of facts, evidence and 

legal argument common to both actions. The Parties agree, however, that if consolidated briefs are 

filed, the page limits for the consolidated opposition and reply should be enlarged to ensure 

sufficient space to address factual and legal arguments specific to each Plaintiff. 

6. This request is not made for purposes of unnecessary delay and no party will be 

prejudiced by the granting of this request. Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. and Plaintiff Gillette 

previously stipulated to an extension of Defendant’s time to file a responsive pleading. Defendants 

Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC and Plaintiff Mohamed previously stipulated to two 

extensions of Defendants’ time to file a responsive pleading. 

THEREFORE, the parties to this Stipulation hereby stipulate and request as follows:

1. The Court order a consolidated opposition, reply and hearing with respect to 

Defendants’ motions to compel arbitration in the Gillette and Mohamed matters. 

2. The Court enlarge the consolidated opposition brief page limit to 40 pages and the 

consolidated reply brief page limit to 25 pages. 

3. The Court set the following consolidated briefing schedule for the motion to compel 

arbitration previously filed in the Gillette action and the motion to compel arbitration anticipated to 

be filed in the Mohamed action:

Plaintiffs’ deadline to file Consolidated 

Opposition to Defendants’ Motions to 

Compel Arbitration 

March 5, 2015

Defendants’ deadline to file Consolidated 

Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition March 23, 2015

Motion to Compel Arbitration Hearing April 9, 2015

4. The Court continue the March 12, 2015 case management conferences in the Gillette 

and Mohamed actions to April 9, 2015, and that the Court continue all associated deadlines 

accordingly.

20 20

Case 3:14-cv-05241-EMC Document 20 Filed 02/09/15 Page 3 of 5
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 

94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQ FOR ORDER 

CHANGING TIME/CONSOLIDATING 

BRIEFING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

3. CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05241 EMC

Dated: February 5, 2015

/s/Andrew M. Spurchise

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Dated: February 5, 2015

/s/ Andrew P. Lee

ANDREW P. LEE

GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN 

& HO

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RONALD GILLETTE

Dated: February 5, 2015 /s/ Tina Wolfson _

TINA WOLFSON

AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC

Attorneys for Plaintiff in Mohamed v. Uber, 

Technologies, Inc., et al. 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document.

DATED: February 5, 2015 /s/ Andrew M. Spurchise 

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE

Case 3:14-cv-05241-EMC Document 20 Filed 02/09/15 Page 4 of 5
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 

94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQ FOR ORDER 

CHANGING TIME/CONSOLIDATING 

BRIEFING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

4. CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05241 EMC

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, this ______ day of February 2015.

__________________________________________

JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN

Firmwide:130885982.1 073208.1047

9th

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-05241-EMC Document 20 Filed 02/09/15 Page 5 of 5