Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00497/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00497-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANGEL LUIS POYE, ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

PUBLIC DEFENDER AREA PARKER, )

et al., ) 

 )

Defendants. )

)

 )

1:08-cv-00497-OWW-SMS 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR A THIRTY-DAY EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT (DOCS. 6, 8)

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis with a civil action. The matter has been referred

to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local

Rules 72-302 and 72-304.

On April 22, 2008, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint

with leave to amend and directed Plaintiff to file a first

amended complaint within thirty days of the date of service of

the order; the Court’s order was served by mail on the same date.

On June 10, 2008, Plaintiff filed a request for an extension

of time that had been signed on May 21, 2008. Again on June 18,

2008, Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time. 

Case 1:08-cv-00497-OWW -SMS Document 8 Filed 06/24/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request

for an extension of time IS GRANTED. Plaintiff SHALL FILE an

amended complaint no later than thirty days after the date of

service of this order. 

Plaintiff IS INFORMED that the failure to file an amended

complaint in accordance with this order will be considered to be

a failure to comply with an order of the Court pursuant to Local

Rule 11-110 and will result in dismissal of this action. Further,

failure to file an amended complaint that states a claim upon

which relief may be granted will be considered to be grounds for

dismissing the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and

will result in dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 23, 2008 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00497-OWW -SMS Document 8 Filed 06/24/08 Page 2 of 2