Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02246/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02246-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 Petitioner sought an immediate release under supervision on the grounds that his

indefinite detention is not authorized by law because there is no prospect that he would be

removed in the reasonably foreseeable future. However, on February 2, 2010, Respondents

filed a Notice to the Court and Suggestion of Mootness, as well as a copy of an Order of

Supervision establishing that on January 22, 2010, Petitioner was released from custody

under an Order of Supervision. Respondents’ evidence demonstrates that Petitioner has

obtained the relief he sought in his petition. Therefore, this action is moot. See Picrin-Peron

v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773, 775 (9th Cir. 1991).

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sheng Qiang Liu, )

)

Petitioner, ) CV 09-2246-PHX-PGR (ECV)

)

v. ) ORDER

)

Katrina Kane, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Voss (Doc. 10) based on Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241. In his Petition, Petitioner alleged that immigration officials were holding him

in detention pending his removal from the United States to China, but that his removal was

not reasonably foreseeable. Having reviewed de novo1

 the Petition and the Report and

Recommendation, and no party having filed any objection to the Report and

Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge Voss’s Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 10) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by the Court. 

Case 2:09-cv-02246-PGR Document 12 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

(Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

DATED this 16th day of March, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02246-PGR Document 12 Filed 03/16/10 Page 2 of 2