Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02245/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02245-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The caption has been amended according to the Dismissal of Doe 1

Defendants portion of this Order.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALETTA MCMURRAY, )

) 2:09-cv-02245-GEB-EFB

Plaintiff, )

) OSC AND ORDER SETTING STATUS

v. ) CONFERENCE

)

)

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SHERIFF )

JOHN MCGUINESS; DEPUTY SHERRIFFS )

JAVIER BUSTAMANTE, V. CANDIDO, L. )

CULP, )

) 

Defendants. )

1

)

Plaintiff and her lawyer were issued an Order to Show Cause

on November 25, 2009 (“November 25 OSC”), which required them to

explain why sanctions should not be imposed for Plaintiff’s failure to

file a timely status report. Since no timely status report was filed,

the status conference was rescheduled to January 19, 2010, and

Plaintiff was required to file a status report no later than fourteen

days prior to the January 19 status conference. 

Plaintiff’s counsel responded to the November 25 OSC, and 

indicated in that response that a hearing was requested on the OSC. 

However, Plaintiff failed to file a status report as required by the

November 25 OSC. Since Plaintiff failed to file a status report

again, Plaintiff and her lawyer are Ordered to Show Cause (“OSC”) in a

Case 2:09-cv-02245-GEB -EFB Document 9 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

writing to be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on January 22, 2010, why

sanctions should not be imposed against her and/or her counsel under

Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for that failure. 

 The hearing on this OSC will be held on March 1, 2010, at

9:00 a.m., at the same time as the hearing on the first OSC issued to

Plaintiff, which is rescheduled to that date and time. Since no

status report was filed the January 19, 2010 status conference is also

rescheduled to March 1, 2010, commencing at 9:00 a.m. In accordance

with the requirements set forth in the August 13, 2009 Initial

Scheduling Order (“August 13 Order”), a joint status report shall be

filed no later than fourteen days prior to the status conference since

review of the docket reveals the Defendants have filed an answer. 

Lastly, the Doe defendants are dismissed since timely 

justification has not been filed warranting Doe defendant allegations

remaining in this case. See August 13 Order, at 2 n.2 (indicating

that if justification for "Doe" defendant allegations not provided Doe

defendants would be dismissed).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

 

Case 2:09-cv-02245-GEB -EFB Document 9 Filed 01/15/10 Page 2 of 2