Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-00753/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-00753-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDDIE LINDSEY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UNITED AIRLINES, INC., et al.,

Defendant. /

No. C 17-00753 WHA

ORDER SETTING

SCHEDULE FOR MOTION

TO TRANSFER VENUE

This action was originally assigned to Judge Donna Ryu. On March 14, defendants

declined magistrate judge jurisdiction and moved to transfer venue (Dkt. Nos. 17–18). The

order reassigning the case to the undersigned judge stated “All hearing and trial dates presently

scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. 

Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned”

(Dkt. No. 21) (emphasis added). Defendants have not renoticed their motion to transfer venue,

but they now make a stipulated request to adjust the briefing schedule. This order treats the

request as renoticing the motion and sets the following schedule:

• Plaintiff’s opposition is due MARCH 31 AT NOON.

• Defendants’ reply is due APRIL 7 AT NOON.

• A hearing is set for MAY 4 AT 8:00 A.M.

Case 3:17-cv-00753-WHA Document 26 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants shall promptly lodge courtesy copies of their motion and supporting papers

with chambers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00753-WHA Document 26 Filed 03/27/17 Page 2 of 2