Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06139/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06139-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LARRY TYRONE BRANTLEY, SR., ELLEN 

BRANTLEY, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

GARRETT BOYD, MODO REALTY, INC., 

PRAVEEN CHANDRA, ACADEMY ESCROW, 

SCHWARTZ & FENSTER, P.C., and 

DOES 1-10, 

Defendants. 

_________________________________

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 07-6139 SC 

ORDER 

 The Court held a Status Conference in this case on July 9, 

2010. On February 3, 2010, Defendant Schwartz & Fenster, P.C., 

filed a Declaration of Trustee's Non-Monetary Status. Docket No. 

136. California Civil Code section 2924l(d) provides that "[i]n 

the event that no objection is served within the 15-day objection 

period, the trustee shall not be required to participate any 

further in the action or proceeding." No party has objected. 

Accordingly, Defendant Schwartz & Fenster, P.C., is DISMISSED from 

this case. 

In its November 19, 2009 Order, the Court explained the 

circumstances under which it would enter Judgment in favor of 

Praveen Chandra and against Academy Escrow in the amount of 

Case 3:07-cv-06139-MMC Document 146 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

$180,000. See Docket No. 129. This offer to Praveen Chandra 

remains in effect. 

The Court ORDERS that the parties must complete mediation of 

this case within thirty (30) days. Although the Court granted 

Plaintiffs Larry and Ellen Brantley ("Plaintiffs") leave to file an 

Amended Complaint, see Docket No. 122, the Amended Complaint was 

filed twenty seven days late on November 13, 2009, and a number of 

Defendants objected. Docket Nos. 125, 126, 127. If this case does 

not settle during mediation, Plaintiffs should request a hearing 

date to address this issue after mediation has been completed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 9, 2010 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-06139-MMC Document 146 Filed 07/09/10 Page 2 of 2