Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05555/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05555-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.

---

Trucker

Ø Huss

A Professional Corporation

100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE ADR TO JULY 

22, 2010, 2010; Case No. C09-05555 RS

1

#1087022 

R. Bradford Huss, SBN 71303 

Clarissa A. Kang, SBN 210660 

Michelle L. Schuller, SBN 255787 

TRUCKER Ø HUSS 

A Professional Corporation 

100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 788-3111 

Facsimile: (415) 421-2017 

E-mail: bhuss@truckerhuss.com 

 ckang@truckerhuss.com 

 mschuller@truckerhuss.com 

Attorneys for DLA Piper LLP (US) Profit Sharing 

and 401(k) Savings Plan Committee, 

Carol Buss, Lawrence A. Robins

and Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD FALCONE, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

DLA PIPER US LLP PROFIT SHARING 

AND 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN 

COMMITTEE; CAROL BUSS; LAWRENCE 

A. ROBINS; BANK OF OKLAHOMA, N.A.; 

and DOES 1-100, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C09-05555 RS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO 

COMPLETE ADR TO JULY 22, 2010 

Plaintiff RICHARD FALCONE (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants DLA PIPER US LLP 

PROFIT SHARING AND 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN COMMITTEE, CAROL BUSS, 

LAWRENCE A. ROBINS and BANK OF OKLAHOMA, N.A. (“Defendants”) hereby stipulate, 

by and through their respective counsel, to continue to July 22, 2010, the deadline to complete 

mediation through the Court’s ADR program as set by the Court’s April 8, 2010 Case Management 

Scheduling Order (Docket #26).

1. Plaintiff and Defendants earlier agreed to participate in mediation pursuant to the 

Court’s rules regarding alternative dispute resolution. 

/RS

Case 3:09-cv-05555-RS Document 40 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 3
Trucker

Ø Huss

A Professional Corporation

100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE ADR TO JULY 

22, 2010, 2010; Case No. C09-05555 RS

2

#1087022 

2. Pursuant to the April 8, 2010 Case Management Scheduling Order, the Court 

referred the parties to mediation, which was to be completed within 90 days from the date of the 

Case Management Scheduling Order. The current deadline for holding the mediation in this case is 

July 7, 2010.

3. On April 19, 2010, the Court notified the parties and counsel that Katherine Ritchey 

was assigned to conduct the mediation to be held in this case. The case was later reassigned to 

mediator James P. Baker on May 13, 2010. 

4. Pursuant to ADR Local Rule 6-4(a), counsel for Plaintiff, counsel for Defendant, 

and the mediator participated in a premediation conference call on June 4, 2010 to discuss the case 

and the scheduling of the mediation. Counsel for both parties and the mediator agreed that 

mediation should take place after the court ruled on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, which at the 

time of the premediation call was pending before the Court. The parties and mediator discussed 

their respective schedules for possible mediation dates after July 7, 2010. Counsel for both parties 

had scheduling conflicts in late June and early July. Counsel for both parties and the mediator 

tentatively reserved July 21 and July 22 as possible mediation dates, subject to confirmation of the 

parties’ availability.

5. Counsel for the parties have now determined that July 22, 2010 is a mutually 

convenient deadline for all counsel and parties to hold mediation in this matter. Holding a 

mediation on that date would also provide all parties with sufficient time to prepare and submit a 

mediation statement in advance of the mediation. 

6. The parties therefore hereby stipulate that, subject to Court approval of this 

Stipulation and final confirmation of the date with the mediator, a mediation of this action shall be 

conducted on or before July 22, 2010. 

DATED: June 10, 2010 LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & 

 JACKSON, P.C. 

 

 By: /s/Margaret Hasselman_______________ 

 Margaret Hasselman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Richard Falcone 

Case 3:09-cv-05555-RS Document 40 Filed 06/11/10 Page 2 of 3
Trucker

Ø Huss

A Professional Corporation

100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE ADR TO JULY 

22, 2010, 2010; Case No. C09-05555 RS

3

#1087022 

DATED: June 10, 2010

TRUCKER Ø HUSS 

By: /s/Clarissa Kang 

Clarissa A. Kang 

Attorneys for Defendants

DLA Piper LLP (US) Profit Sharing and 401(k) 

Savings Plan Committee, Carol Buss, Lawrence 

A. Robins and Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. 

I attest that my firm has obtained Ms. Hasselman’s concurrence in the filing of this document. 

DATED: June 10, 2010 

/s/Clarissa A. Kang 

Clarissa A. Kang 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

United States District Court Judge 

6-10-10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Richard Seeborg

Case 3:09-cv-05555-RS Document 40 Filed 06/11/10 Page 3 of 3