Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03365/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03365-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

J:\1427\sf0001\P-STIP.CONTINUE.wpd Case No. C 07-03365 EDL

DALE L. ALLEN, JR., # 145279

DIRK D. LARSEN, # 246028

LOW, BALL & LYNCH

505 Montgomery Street, 7th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-2584

Telephone (415) 981-6630

Facsimile (415) 982-1634

Attorneys for Defendant

CITY OF CLEARLAKE

(erroneously named herein as CLEARLAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DAVID DAVIS and PAGE GEARHART-DAVIS

PRO-SE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CLEARLAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 07-03365 EDL

STIPULATION TO

CONTINUANCE OF CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

SET FOR TUESDAY, OCTOBER

23, 2007

COMES NOW Defendant City of Clearlake with the following representations and stipulation to

continue the case management conference scheduled for October 23, 2007, before The Honorable Magistrate

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, to Tuesday November 13, 2007.

On the filing of an answer on behalf of the City of Clearlake on October 18, 2007, counsel for the City

of Clearlake were informed that a case management conference was on schedule for October 23, 2007, before

The Honorable Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Due to a trial conflict by counsel for the City of

Clearlake, the court suggested that the parties stipulate to a continuance of the case management conference to

a more convenient date. 

Dale L. Allen, Jr., counsel for the City of Clearlake, contacted Ms. Page Davis, plaintiff in pro se, and

requested the stipulation to continue the case management conference. Ms. Davis stipulated on behalf of

herself and her husband, David Davis, also a plaintiff in pro se. It was agreed that a Tuesday would be the best

Case 3:07-cv-03365-EDL Document 13 Filed 10/22/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

J:\1427\sf0001\P-STIP.CONTINUE.wpd Case No. C 07-03365 EDL

day for the continued case management conference, and based on scheduling, November 13, 2007 was agreed

as the earliest and best available date.

COME NOW the parties with the stipulation to continue the case management conference from

Tuesday, October 23, 2007, and a request to have the case management conference rescheduled for Tuesday,

November 13, 2007, or the first available Tuesday convenient to the court’s calendar.

Dated: October _____, 2007.

LOW, BALL & LYNCH

 By /s/ Dale L. Allen, Jr. 

DALE L. ALLEN, JR.

DIRK D. LARSEN

Attorneys for Defendant

CITY OF CLEARLAKE

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October _____, 2007. ________________________________________

Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cv-03365-EDL Document 13 Filed 10/22/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

PROOF OF SERVICE

J:\1427\sf0001\P-STIP.CONTINUE.wpd

PROOF OF SERVICE

Action: David Davis and Page Gearhart-Davis v. Clearlake Police Department

U.S.D.C./Northern District Case No. C-07-03365 EDL

I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within action. I am employed at Low,

Ball & Lynch, 505 Montgomery Street, 7th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111.

On the date indicated below, I served the following documents enclosed in a sealed envelope on the

listed addresses:

DOCUMENT: STIPULATION TO CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE SET FOR TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2007

ADDRESSES:

David Davis and Page Gearhart -Davis

P.O. Box 3235

Clearlake, CA 95422

Tel: 707-995-0749

Plaintiffs In Pro Se

[X] (BY MAIL) I placed a true copy, enclosed in a sealed, postage paid envelope, and deposited same

for collection and mailing at San Francisco, California, following ordinary business practices, addressed

as set forth below.

[ ] (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused each such envelope to be delivered by hand to the

addressees noted above or on the attachment herein by Legal Services.

[ ] (BY FACSIMILE) I caused the said document to be transmitted by Facsimile transmission to the

number indicated after the addresses noted above or on the attachment herein.

[ ] (BY OVERNIGHT COURIER) I caused each such envelope addressed to the parties to be

deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained by the overnight courier or driver authorized by

the overnight courier to receive documents.

[ ] (BY CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED) I placed a true copy, enclosed

in a sealed, postage-paid envelope, and deposited same for collection and mailing at San Francisco,

California, following ordinary business practices, addressed as set forth below.

I am readily familiar with this law firm’s practice for the collection and processing of documents for

regular and certified mailing, overnight mail, and facsimile transaction, and said document(s) are deposited with

the United States Postal Service or overnight courier depository on the same day in the ordinary course of

business.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed at San Francisco, California on October 18, 2007.

 /s/ M. Kathryn Mansfield

Case 3:07-cv-03365-EDL Document 13 Filed 10/22/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

PROOF OF SERVICE

J:\1427\sf0001\P-STIP.CONTINUE.wpd

Case 3:07-cv-03365-EDL Document 13 Filed 10/22/07 Page 4 of 4