Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02441/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02441-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

---

FOLGER LEVIN &

KAHN LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 ORDER DISMISSING 

CERTAIN DEFENDANTS WITH PREJUDICE; 

CASE NO. CIV-S-00-2441 FCD KJM 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CITY OF LODI, CALIFORNIA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

M&P INVESTMENTS, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. CIV-S-00-2441 FCD KJM 

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN 

DEFENDANTS WITH PREJUDICE 

UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE 41(a)(2) 

AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS, 

COUNTERCLAIMS, THIRD-PARTY 

CLAIMS AND FOURTH-PARTY 

CLAIMS. 

Having considered the City’s Motion for Order Dismissing Certain Defendants with 

Prejudice Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the Declaration of Margaret R. 

Dollbaum in Support of Motion for Order Dismissing Certain Defendants with Prejudice Under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), and the record as a whole, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

that the City’s Motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER OREDERED that: 

1. Defendants Robert Spiekerman is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

2. Defendant Dolores Grace is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

3. Defendant Louverna Harrison is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

4. Defendant Siu Yin Kong is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

5. Defendant Lodi Unified School District is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Case 2:00-cv-02441-FCD-KJM Document 3036 Filed 08/13/08 Page 1 of 2
FOLGER LEVIN &

KAHN LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -2- 

ORDER DISMISSING 

CERTAIN DEFENDANTS WITH PREJUDICE; 

CASE NO. CIV-S-00-2441 FCD KJM 

6. Defendant Lodi Avenue Centers Limited Partnership is hereby dismissed with 

prejudice. 

7. Defendant California Pallet Corporation is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

8. Defendant Tokay Foundry Corp. is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

9. Each party is to bear its own costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 12, 2008 By ______________________________ 

 HON. FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:00-cv-02441-FCD-KJM Document 3036 Filed 08/13/08 Page 2 of 2