Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03023/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03023-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Vincent P. Hurley, #111215 

Douglas F. Young, #84531 

LAW OFFICES OF VINCENT P. HURLEY 

A Professional Corporation 

38 Seascape Village 

Aptos, California 95003 

Telephone: (831) 661-4800 

Facsimile: (831) 661-4804 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DAMON KEEVE 

Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney #139669 

Elizabeth S. Salveson, Chief Labor Attorney #83788 

Stacey A. Lucas, Deputy City Attorney #154345 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 5th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3949 

Facsimile: (415) 554-4248 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

And HEATHER FONG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

DAMON KEEVE, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO

POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND 

HEATHER FONG, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 05-03023 SBA 

STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO 

CONTINUE HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN

THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT and 

[PROPOSED ORDER] 

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 

1. Hearing on the motion for summary judgment by defendants, presently set for 

hearing on December 12, 2006, at 1:00 p.m. in the above-entitled court shall be continued until 

Stipulation & Proposed Order Case No. C 05-03023 SBA 

XXXXXXXX

Case 4:05-cv-03023-SBA Document 45 Filed 11/28/06 Page 1 of 3
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

December 19, 2006, at 1:00 p.m. Plaintiff shall have until November 27, 2006 to file his 

opposition to the motion; Defendants shall have until December 5, 2006 to file their reply. 

2. The continuance is at the request of Plaintiff’s counsel in order that he may 

review approximately 300 pages of documents served on him today, November 20, 2006, for 

purposes of determining their relevance to the pending motion. 

Defense counsel attempted to advise Plaintiff's counsel regarding these documents last 

week but he was in trial for the entire week and was unable to respond. 

3. It is the position of Plaintiff only that it would be severely prejudicial to Plaintiff 

to have to respond to the motion for summary judgment without the benefit of the analysis of the 

documents and inclusion of or reference to relevant documents. 

It is Defendants' position that the existence of these documents was well-known to 

Plaintiff's counsel, the failure to produce them was an oversight, and Defendants did not rely on 

these documents in the preparation of the pending motion for summary judgment. 

4. There have been no previous applications for enlargement of time by any party 

for continuance of hearing on the motion for summary judgment. 

5. The settlement conference in the above-entitled matter is presently set for 

December 18, 2006; pre-trial conference is set for January 2, 2007; trial is set for February 5, 

2007. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: November 20, 2006 

LAW OFFICES OF VINCENT P. HURLEY 

A Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ 

 DOUGLAS F. YOUNG 

Attorneys for Plaintiff DAMON KEEVE 

Dated:; November 20, 2006 

By: /s/ 

STACEY A. LUCAS 

Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY 

OF SAN FRANCISCO and HEATHER FONG 

Stipulation & Proposed Order Case No. C 05-03023 SBA 

Case 4:05-cv-03023-SBA Document 45 Filed 11/28/06 Page 2 of 3
3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT hearing on the motion for summary judgment by 

Defendants, presently set for hearing on December 12, 2006, at 1:00 p.m. in the above-entitled 

court shall be continued until December 19, 2006, at 1:00 p.m. Plaintiff shall have until 

November 27, 2006 to file his opposition to the motion; Defendants shall have until December 5, 

2006 to file their reply. The scheduling order shall not otherwise be amended. 

Dated: 

The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong 

United States District Judge 

Stipulation & Proposed Order Case No. C 05-03023 SBA 

11/27/06

Case 4:05-cv-03023-SBA Document 45 Filed 11/28/06 Page 3 of 3