Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01632/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01632-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF 

FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01632 WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985) 

nchatterjee@orrick.com 

ANDREW S. ONG (STATE BAR NO. 267889) 

aong@orrick.com 

CATHY C. SHYONG (STATE BAR NO. 288537) 

cshyong@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: +1-650-614-7400 

Facsimile: +1-650-614-7401 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LOGITECH EUROPE S.A. 

MING-TAO YANG (STATE BAR NO. 221295) 

ming-yang@finnegan.com 

GREGORY K. STOREY (STATE BAR NO. 211792) 

greg.storey@finnegan.com 

JUSTIN A. HENDRIX (STATE BAR NO. 301057) 

justin.hendrix@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ACROX TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

LOGITECH EUROPE S.A., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ACROX TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01632-WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE 

Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup 

Case 3:15-cv-01632-WHA Document 58 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF 

FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01632 WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff Logitech 

Europe S.A. and Defendant Acrox Technologies Co., Ltd., pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), that 

all claims asserted by and between them in the above-captioned matter be, and upon approval are, 

dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees. 

The Court will retain jurisdiction over this matter for the limited purpose of enforcing the parties’ 

settlement agreement. 

Dated: November 5, 2015 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

By: /s/ I. Neel Chatterjee 

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LOGITECH EUROPE S.A.

Dated: November 5, 2015 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT 

& DUNNER, LLP 

By: /s/ Ming-Tao Yang 

MING-TAO YANG 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ACROX TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury 

that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory. 

Dated: November 5, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ I. Neel Chatterjee 

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________, 2015 ____________________________ 

Honorable William H. Alsup 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-01632-WHA Document 58 Filed 11/10/15 Page 2 of 2