Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_00-cv-05103/USCOURTS-caed-1_00-cv-05103-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN T. HILL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPT. CORRECTIONS,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:00-cv-05103-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 138)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 135)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Brian T. Hill (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro

se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 28, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein that recommended Defendants’ motion for

summary judgment be granted. The Findings and Recommendations

were served on the parties and contained notice to the parties

that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to

be filed within thirty (30) days. To date, the parties have not

Case 1:00-cv-05103-AWI -SMS Document 140 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 28, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed November

7, 2005, is GRANTED on Plaintiff’s First Amendment claims against

Defendants Terhune and Galaza; and,

3. This order having resolved the last remaining claims in

this action, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment

for Defendants and close this file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:00-cv-05103-AWI -SMS Document 140 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2