Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05501/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05501-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VERINATA HEALTH, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC,

Defendant.

Case No. 12-cv-05501-SI 

ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL

Re: Dkt. Nos. 236, 238

On April 24, 2015, the Court granted in part and denied in part the parties motions to seal 

twenty-nine separate documents. Docket No. 231. In its order, the Court denied the parties’ 

motion as to three documents, and provided specific reasons as to why each document was not 

sealable. The Court also ordered four documents stricken and refiled as they contained redacted

portions that did not match the redactions referenced in the supporting declarations. Id. The parties 

now renew their motions to file under seal in light of the Court’s prior order. 

The Court finds that the parties have adequately remedied the defects outlined in the 

Court’s prior order, and therefore GRANTS their motions to seal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 14, 2015

________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:12-cv-05501-SI Document 244 Filed 05/14/15 Page 1 of 1