Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01610/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01610-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07-1610 Best Deals v Naveed (Preliminary Injunction).wpd

1

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

FRED M. BLUM, ESQ. (SBN 101586–FBlum@bmeblaw.com)

JOSEPH B. ADAMS, ESQ. (SBN 194964–JAdams@bmeblaw.com)

REBECCA K. KIMURA, ESQ. (SBN 220420–RKimura@bmeblaw.com)

BASSI, MARTINI, EDLIN & BLUM LLP

351 California Street, Suite 200

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 397-9006

Facsimile: (415) 397-1339

Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS

BEST DEALS ON TV, INC., REGALCOM, INC., 3ZNET, INC., SONDOS FUND

MANAGEMENT, LLC, AND MUHAMMAD ASLAM MUGHAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

BEST DEALS ON TV, INC., A California

Corporation; REGALCOM, INC., A California

Corporation; 3ZNET, INC., A California

Corporation; SONDOS FUND

MANAGEMENT, LLC, A California Limited

Liability Company; MUHAMMAD ASLAM

MUGHAL, An Individual,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

MOHTASHIM NAVEED, An Individual;

QAMAR ALI KHAN, An Individual;

ASMATULLAH KHAN, An Individual; MIAN

NAEEM UDDIN, An Individual, 

Defendants. ______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 07-1610 (SBA)

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Case 4:07-cv-01610-SBA Document 38 Filed 04/12/07 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07-1610 Best Deals v Naveed (Preliminary Injunction).wpd

2

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I. INTRODUCTION.

The Petition filed by plaintiffs BEST DEALS ON TV, INC. (“BEST DEALS”), 

REGALCOM, INC. (“REGALCOM”), 3ZNET, INC. (“3ZNET”), SONDOS FUND

MANAGEMENT, LLC (“SONDOS”), and MUHAMMAD ASLAM MUGHAL (“MUGHAL”)

(collectively the Plaintiffs will be referred to herein as the “PLAINTIFFS”), for a Preliminary

Injunction came on for hearing on April 12, 2007, at 9:00 a.m.

II. ISSUES RAISED AND RELIEF SOUGHT.

PLAINTIFFS allege that defendants MOHTASHIM NAVEED, QAMAR ALI KHAN,

ASMATULLAH KHAN, and MIAN NAEEM UDDIN, (hereinafter these Defendants, along

with their agents, servants, employees, and anyone acting on concert with them, are collectively

referred to as the “DEFENDANTS”) and each of them, are in unlawful possession of

PLAINTIFFS’ business premises, facilities, web sites, inventory, computers and other assets–at

the exclusion and detriment of PLAINTIFFS.

PLAINTIFFS seek an order enjoining DEFENDANTS and restoring possession of the

business premises and all assets therein to PLAINTIFFS, including but not limited to:

A. Prohibiting DEFENDANTS from entering, or coming within one-thousand

(1000) feet, of the business offices of BEST DEALS, REGALCOM, 3ZNET,

and/or SONDOS, located at: 5696 Stewart Avenue, Fremont, California

(collectively referred to hereinafter as “The Businesses”); 

B. Prohibiting DEFENDANTS from using–or accessing remotely–any business

machines, computers, web sites, servers, on-line accounts, trade secrets,

marketing materials, or other business facilities, assets and information

technologies of The Businesses;

C. Ordering DEFENDANTS to return and refund immediately–within 24 hours of

entry of this Order–any and all business property DEFENDANTS have in their

possession, including, but not limited to: security passwords, copyrighted

materials, customer lists, marketing materials, software and/or programming

Case 4:07-cv-01610-SBA Document 38 Filed 04/12/07 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07-1610 Best Deals v Naveed (Preliminary Injunction).wpd

3

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

code, office keys, parking permits, identification/access cards, corporate vehicles,

corporate credit cards for The Businesses, and any other property of

PLAINTIFFS issued to DEFENDANTS as employees of PLAINTIFFS, or to

which DEFENDANTS had access;

D. Granting PLAINTIFFS possession and custody of the entire property and/or

assets of The Businesses, to be held by PLAINTIFFS or PLAINTIFFS’ nominee;

E. Granting PLAINTIFFS and their attorneys Bassi, Martini, Edlin & Blum, LLP,

and/or their agents, access to, and control over, BEST DEALS and

REGALCOM’S post office boxes, as well as any and all mail, post, and/or other

parcels delivered or remaining therein, located at:

(1) PostNet Postal & Business Services

5178 Mowry Ave., Box #2100

Fremont, California 94538

and

(2) Post Office Box #3385

Fremont, California, 94539

F. Relieving PLAINTIFFS of the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Rule 26, for the purpose of immediately serving discovery upon third party financial institutions.

III. FINDINGS.

The Court having read the Petition, Response papers, and the Reply memorandum, and

having considered the evidence presented therein, makes the following findings in support of

GRANTING the Preliminary Injunction:

(1) DEFENDANTS hold no proprietary interest or occupancy rights to The Business

premises located at 5696 Stewart Avenue, Fremont, California;

(2) DEFENDANTS hold no proprietary interest in BEST DEALS, REGALCOM,

3ZNET, or SONDOS;

(3) MUGHAL has demonstrated his proprietary interest in BEST DEALS,

REGALCOM, 3ZNET, or SONDOS;

Case 4:07-cv-01610-SBA Document 38 Filed 04/12/07 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07-1610 Best Deals v Naveed (Preliminary Injunction).wpd

4

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

(4) Best Deals on TV, Inc. and Regalcom, Inc. have demonstrated occupancy rights

to the premises located at 5696 Stewart Avenue, Fremont, California;

(5) PLAINTIFFS have demonstrated a prima facie showing of a likelihood of success

on the merits of their Trespass claims against DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS PLAINTIFFS’ petition for Preliminary

Injunction and enjoins DEFENDANTS as follows: 

A. DEFENDANTS are prohibited from entering the business offices of BEST

DEALS, REGALCOM, 3ZNET, and/or SONDOS, located at: 5696 Stewart

Avenue, Fremont, California (collectively referred to hereinafter as “The

Businesses”); 

B. DEFENDANTS are prohibited from using–or accessing remotely–any business

machines, computers, web sites, servers, on-line accounts, trade secrets,

marketing materials, or other business facilities, assets and information

technologies of The Businesses;

C. DEFENDANTS are ordered to return immediately–within 24 hours of entry of

this Order–any and all business property DEFENDANTS have in their

possession, including, but not limited to: security passwords, copyrighted

materials, customer lists, marketing materials, software and/or programming

code, office keys, parking permits, identification/access cards, corporate vehicles,

corporate credit cards for The Businesses, and any other property of

PLAINTIFFS issued to DEFENDANTS as employees of PLAINTIFFS, or to

which DEFENDANTS had access. As to American Express Business Platinum

Card number 372714012191009 issued to Mian Naeem Uddin and 3ZNet, Inc.,

said card shall be cancelled no later than 1 P.M. on April 12, 2007.

The Court further order as follows:

D. PLAINTIFFS are granted possession and custody of the entire property and/or

Case 4:07-cv-01610-SBA Document 38 Filed 04/12/07 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07-1610 Best Deals v Naveed (Preliminary Injunction).wpd

5

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

assets of The Businesses, to be held by PLAINTIFFS or PLAINTIFFS’ nominee,

as Custodians for the property during the entire pendency of this Order;

E. PLAINTIFFS, or PLAINTIFFS’ nomine, are granted access to, and control over,

BEST DEALS and REGALCOM’S post office boxes, as well as any and all mail,

post, and/or other parcels delivered or remaining therein, located at:

(1) PostNet Postal & Business Services

5178 Mowry Ave., Box #2100

Fremont, California 94538

and

(2) Post Office Box #3385

Fremont, California, 94539

F. The Parties are hereby relieved of the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure Rule 26, for the purpose of immediately obtaining discovery from third

party financial institutions.

This Order shall remain in effect for the pendency of this action, or until such time

as the Court deems fit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 12, 2007 ___________________________________

HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES

DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:07-cv-01610-SBA Document 38 Filed 04/12/07 Page 5 of 5