Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02607/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02607-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUNE JONES,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHEVRON TEXACO STANDARD OIL

COMPANY,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 05-02607 JSW

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

On August 25, 2005, Defendant Chevron Texaco Standard Oil Company (“Defendant”)

filed and served a motion for summary judgment and set a hearing for November 4, 2005 at

9:00 a.m. On August 26, 2005, this Court issued an order informing Plaintiff that she had an

obligation to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion and that failure to do so may result in the

dismissal of this case. Plaintiff was informed that a motion for summary judgment under Rule

56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure would, if granted, end Plaintiff’s case. See Rand v.

Rowland 154 F.3d 952, 953-54 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc). The Court allowed Jones up until

September 30, 2005, to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and

was told that if no opposition is filed, summary judgment may be granted and Plaintiff’s case

will be dismissed. 
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court has received no opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 

Further, the Court has reviewed the motion and hereby finds that there is no genuine issue as to

any material fact and that Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Therefore, the

Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The hearing date of

November 4, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. is HEREBY VACATED. The action is dismissed with

prejudice. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 14, 2005 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE