Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02621/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02621-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLEO WESTERFIELD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-2621 MCE GGH P

vs.

DR. PENNER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On July 26, 2005, plaintiff filed a “separate statements of undisputed material

facts and referance [sic] to supporting Cleo Westerfield contentions.” That document was not

served on defendants. Plaintiff is advised that every document submitted to the court for

consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to be served

electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. If an attorney has filed a

document with the court on behalf of any defendants, then documents submitted by plaintiff must

be served on that attorney and not on the defendants. Every document submitted conventionally

to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate stating the date an

accurate copy of the document was mailed to defendants or their attorney and the address to

which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

/////

Case 2:02-cv-02621-MCE -GGH Document 94 Filed 08/04/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the date of

this order plaintiff shall serve a copy of his July 26, 2005 “separate statements of undisputed

material facts and referance [sic] to supporting Cleo Westerfield contentions” on counsel for

defendants and shall file proper proof of said service. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply

with this order will result in this document’s being placed in the file and disregarded and may

also result in the imposition of additional sanctions. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to serve

any documents subsequently filed in this action properly, and failure to include a proper

certificate of service with such filing, may result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed.

DATED: 8/3/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009/bb

west2621.35b

 

Case 2:02-cv-02621-MCE -GGH Document 94 Filed 08/04/05 Page 2 of 2