Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-15-40916/USCOURTS-ca5-15-40916-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40916

Summary Calendar

ROBERTA COSGROVE; CONNIE COSGROVE, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

CITY OF PLANO, TEXAS, 

 Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CV-660

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the following reasons.

Plaintiffs have not identified any due process right violated by the City. 

No objection is made to the No. 2012-8-16 ordinance itself. It limits to eight 

children the number cared for by the Plaintiffs. They were not entitled to care 

for 12 children because they had no permit. The City Council denied further 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 8, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40916 Document: 00513299442 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2015
No. 15-40916

2

action because “more than eight is simply too many.” The judgment of the 

district judge, based upon the explanations of the magistrate judge, is correct. 

Any pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-40916 Document: 00513299442 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2015