Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-01546/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-01546-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 625
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, ║ ║ Plaintiff, ║ CV 12-01546-PHX-JAT ║ v. ║ STIPULATION JUDGMENT ║ CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE

1. $14,000.00 in United States Currency; ║ CAUSE ║ 2. $40,000.00 in United States Currency, ║ ║ Defendants, ║ ║ Regarding the Interest of Danny Murray, ║ ║ Claimant. ║ ║

Pursuant to written stipulation filed herein by the Parties regarding an interest in 

the property identified as defendants herein, and there being no objection, and the Court 

finding good cause, it is hereby ordered that the Stipulation for Compromise Settlement, 

and the facts contained therein, are adopted by the Court. The parties have stipulated to 

the following orders by the Court, and the Court orders as follows pursuant to the parties’ 

stipulation: 

IT IS ORDERED that the sum of the $27,000 shall be forfeited to the United 

States, and shall be disposed of according to law. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the remaining sum of defendants 1 and 2 shall be 

released to claimants. No interest is awarded. Each party shall pay its own costs and 

attorneys’ fees, 

Case 2:12-cv-01546-JAT Document 36 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Claimants release and forever discharge the 

United States Department of Justice; the United States Marshals Service; the Drug 

Enforcement Administration and all officers, employees, contract employees, agents, task 

force agents and any other law enforcement official from any and all actions, causes of 

actions, suits, proceedings, debts, dues, contracts, judgments, damages, claims, and/or 

demands whatsoever in law or equity which the Claimants, their successors, or assigns 

ever had, now have, or nay have in the future related to the seizure, detention, and 

forfeiture of defendants 1 and 2. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the terms of 28 U.S.C. 2465, 

Claimant has not substantially prevailed as the result of this settlement agreement. 

 Dated this 23rd day of April, 2014. 

Case 2:12-cv-01546-JAT Document 36 Filed 04/23/14 Page 2 of 2