Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00455/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00455-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID WAYNE WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

LURA MERRITT, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:22-cv-00455-JLT-CDB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTION 

ORDER

(Doc. 31)

The assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s

“Motion for Protection Order,” which the Court construed as a motion for temporary and/or 

permanent injunctive relief. (Doc. 31.) The Court advised the Plaintiff that any objections were 

due within 14 days of the date of service (Id. at 6) and that the “[f]ailure to file objections within 

the specified time may result in waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 

F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014); Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) 

Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so has expired. 

According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this 

case. Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court concludes the findings and 

recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on April 21, 2023 (Doc. 31) are 

ADOPTED in full.

Case 1:22-cv-00455-JLT-CDB Document 33 Filed 06/20/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 26) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 19, 2023 

Case 1:22-cv-00455-JLT-CDB Document 33 Filed 06/20/23 Page 2 of 2