Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01916/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01916-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

EDWARD D. JOHNSON (SBN 189475) 

SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 205584) 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW, LLP 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 331-4537 

wjohnson@mayerbrownrowe.com

Richard J. Favretto 

Andrew A. Nicely 

John Roberti 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW, LLP 

1909 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006 

Telephone: (202) 263-3000 

Facsimile: (202) 263-3300 

rfavretto@mayerbrownrowe.com

Attorneys for Defendants UNITED AIR LINES, INC. 

and UAL CORP. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

Y. HATA & CO., LIMITED, on behalf of itself

And all others similarly situated 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

AIR FRANCE-KLM; BRITISH AIRWAYS, 

PLC; ASIANA AIRLINES CO., LTD.; JAPAN 

AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.; 

CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD.; 

DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AG; 

SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES SYTEMS; 

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.; UAL CORP.; 

CARGOLUX AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL 

SA; LAN AIRLINES SA; POLAR AIR 

CARGO, INC.; ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE 

HOLDINGS, INC.; KOREAN AIRLINES CO., 

LTD.; SINGAPORE AIRLINES, LTD.; ACE 

AVIATION HOLDINGS, INC.; AIR CANADA; 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.; AMR 

CORPORATION; SINGAPORE AIRLINES 

CARGO PTE LTD.; and VIRGIN ATLANTIC 

AIRWAYS LTD., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. CV 06-01916-SC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

 The Honorable Samuel Conti 

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(A)

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV 06-01916

PADB01 44022181.1 02-AUG-06 17:08 

Case 3:06-cv-01916-SC Document 57 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 3
- 2 - 

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(A)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendants United Air Lines, Inc., and UAL Corp., 

respectfully request that this Court enter an order extending the time in which Defendants must 

answer, move or otherwise plead to this matter until the later of (1) the date when the Defendant 

would otherwise be required to file a response pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, or (2) 

45 days after a consolidated complaint is filed by Plaintiffs in the single transferee Court and served 

on Defendants. Plaintiff Y. Hata & Co., Limited has consented to the requested extension. In 

support of this motion, Defendants state: 

1. The Complaint in this matter was filed on March 13, 2006. It seeks relief under the 

Sherman Act and the Clayton Act against 20 defendants on behalf of a putative class. 

2. More than 80 similar actions have been filed in various jurisdictions around the country. 

3. Plaintiffs in a number of related cases filed motions to consolidate and transfer before the 

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) under the matter captioned In re Air Cargo 

Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1775. On June 20, 2006, the JPML ordered all 

cases, including this case, to be transferred to the U.S. District Court for Eastern District of New 

York. 

WHEREFORE, the Defendants request that this Court grant an extension of the Defendants’ 

time to answer, move or otherwise plead in response to the complaint until the later of: (1) the date 

when the Defendant would otherwise be required to file a response pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12, or (2) 45 days after a consolidated complaint is filed by Plaintiffs in the single 

transferee Court and served on Defendants. 

Dated: August 2, 2006 KERSHAW, CUTTER & RATINOFF LLP 

/s/ C. Brooks Cutter 

C. Brooks Cutter (SBN 121407) 

Kershaw, Cutter & Ratinoff LLP 

980 9th Street, Suite 1900 

Sacramento, California 95814 

T: (916) 448-9800 

F: (916) 669-4499 

Attorney for Plaintiff Y. Hata & Co., Limited 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV 06-01916

PADB01 44022181.1 02-Aug-06 17:08 

Case 3:06-cv-01916-SC Document 57 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 3
- 3 - 

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(A)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: August 2, 2006 MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW, LLP 

/s/ Shirish Gupta 

Shirish Gupta 

Attorneys for Defendants United Air Lines, Inc. and 

UAL Corp. 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), Shirish Gupta hereby attests 

that the signatories’ concurrences in the filing of this document have been obtained. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED:__________________ 

 The Honorable Samuel Conti 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV 06-01916

PADB01 44022181.1 02-Aug-06 17:08 

August 4, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:06-cv-01916-SC Document 57 Filed 08/04/06 Page 3 of 3