Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06387/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06387-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6387

JOE RANGEL,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA STANSBERRY,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate 

Judge. (3:08-cv-00782-MHL)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: July 1, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joe Rangel, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6387 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/01/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Joe Rangel, a federal prisoner, appeals the magistrate 

judge’s order*

AFFIRMED

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 

2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Rangel v. Stansberry, 

No. 3:08-cv-00782-MHL (E.D. Va., Jan. 12, 2010). We deny 

Rangel’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

 * The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by 

the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).

Appeal: 10-6387 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/01/2010 Pg: 2 of 2