Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00200/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00200-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

1 

2 

3 

4 

6 

7 

8 

9 

11 

12 

13 

14 

16 

17 

18 

19 

21 

22 

23 

24 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STANFORD P. BRYANT CASE NO. 07cv0200 JM(PCL) 

vs. 

TIM OCHOA, Warden; et al. 

Plaintiff: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 

ALTER OR AMEND THE 

JUDGMENT 

Defendants. 

"Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered 

evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) ifthere is an 

intervening change in controlling law. There may also be other, highly unusual, circumstances 

warranting reconsideration." School Dist. No. 11 v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993) 

(citations omitted), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2742 (1994). Here, Plaintiff fails to identifY any newly 

discovered evidence, clear error, or intervening change in controlling law. Consequently, the motion 

for reconsideration, brought pursuant to Federal Rule ofCivil Procedure 59, is denied 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ~.1..( ,2011 

CC: All parties 

- 1 - 07cv0200 

Case 3:07-cv-00200-JM-PCL Document 216 Filed 02/01/11 Page 1 of 1