Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01238/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01238-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

tanya@moorelawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Rachel Lobato

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RACHEL LOBATO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DILJEET S. KHAHRA, individually and dba 

HWY 46 QUICK STOP, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:15-cv-01238---JLT

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

OF ENTIRE ACTION; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

(Doc. 11)

Case 1:15-cv-01238---JLT Document 12 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 3
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the remaining Defendants Diljeet S. Khahra, individually and dba Hwy 46 

Quick Stop; and Mohinder Kaur Kahra, individually and dba Hwy 46 Quick Stop have not filed 

an answer or motion for summary judgment;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants Diljeet S. Khahra, individually and dba Hwy 46 

Quick Stop; and Mohinder Kaur Kahra, individually and dba Hwy 46 Quick Stop have settled 

the matter;

WHEREAS, no counterclaim has been filed;

Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests that this action be dismissed with prejudice as to 

Defendants Diljeet S. Khahra, individually and dba Hwy 46 Quick Stop; and Mohinder Kaur 

Kahra, individually and dba Hwy 46 Quick Stop, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(1)(A)(i), and the case closed in its entirety.

Date: November 13, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Rachel Lobato

ORDER

On November 13, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the entire action. 

(Doc. 11) The notice relies upon Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which “the 

plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the 

opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of 

dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a 

notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required for the dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). No defendant has 

answered or appeared in this action. 

Based upon the foregoing, the Court ORDERS:

Case 1:15-cv-01238---JLT Document 12 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 3
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice of 

dismissal with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01238---JLT Document 12 Filed 11/16/15 Page 3 of 3