Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06338/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06338-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 The Court will arrange for the transportation of plaintiff to the courthouse.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRI BROTHER,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEHACHAPI PRISON MEDICAL

PROVIDER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. CV-F-03-6338 REC SMS P

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SUBMIT

FURTHER BRIEFING, AND SETTING

EVIDENTIARY HEARING

(Doc. 76)

Defendants’ Brief Due: June 6, 2005

Plaintiff’s Brief Due: June 27, 2005

Hearing Date: June 30, 2005

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Location: Courtroom 4

(SMS)

Pursuant to the Court’s order of May 19, 2005, the parties shall submit further briefing on

the issue of whether or not plaintiff exhausted the available administrative remedies with respect to

his excessive force claim against defendant Granillo. Defendants shall file a supplemental brief

specifically addressing plaintiff’s allegation that on three occasions he submitted an appeal grieving

the excessive force incident and the appeal disappeared each time. Defendants’ attention is directed

to Ngo v. Woodford, 403 F.3d 620 (9th Cir. 2005) and to the line of cases set forth in the March 23,

2005 Findings and Recommendations on page 3 at beginning at line 26. After defendants have filed

their supplemental brief, plaintiff may, if he chooses, file a reply brief. Following the submission

of the briefs, an evidentiary hearing at which the parties must personally appear shall be held.1 Wyatt

Case 1:03-cv-06338-AWI -SMS Document 77 Filed 05/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1119-120 (9th Cir. 2003) (In deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to

exhaust administrative remedies, the court may look beyond the pleadings and decide disputed issues

of fact.) 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants shall file a supplemental brief on or before June 6, 2005;

2. Plaintiff’s reply brief, if any, is due on or before June 27, 2005; and

3. This matter is set for an evidentiary hearing on June 30, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. before

the undersigned in Courtroom 4.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06338-AWI -SMS Document 77 Filed 05/20/05 Page 2 of 2