Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03125/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03125-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HOBIE H. TRIVITTE, Administrator of the

Estate of Eleanor Ann Trivitte,

Plaintiff,

v.

HEALTHCOMP, INC., et al.,

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C04-3125 PVT

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE; SETTING DEADLINE FOR

PARTIES TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

STATEMENT; AND STRIKING DEFENDANTS’

NOVEMBER 10, 2005 CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE STATEMENT FROM COURT

FILE

On June 2, 2005, based on the parties’ representation that they had “agreed to an outline for

the proposed resolution of this lawsuit,” the court signed off a Stipulation & Order to Vacate Pretrial

Conference and Bench Trial and Schedule Case Management Conference, setting a case

management conference for November 15, 2005.1 On November 10, 2005 Defendants filed a Case

Management Conference Statement which the court is informed by staff improperly reveals the

substance of the parties’ confidential settlement discussions. The court has thus not reviewed

Defendants’ Case Management Conference Statement. The court is informed that Defendants are

requesting that the court proceed with trial setting. Because neither a stipulated dismissal nor a

consent judgment has been filed, the court assumes the parties failed to reach a final settlement

Case 5:04-cv-03125-PVT Document 56 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If Plaintiff contends a final settlement was reached, he shall so state in the parties’ Joint

Supplemental Case Management Conference Statement, in which case the parties shall each set forth

their respective positions regarding what procedural steps are appropriate at this time. However, neither

party shall reveal the substance of anyconfidential settlement discussions in the Joint Supplemental Case

Management Conference Statement.

ORDER, page 2

agreement.2 The Plaintiff has not filed any Case Management Conference Statement. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case management conference is continued to November

29, 2005. No later than November 22, 2005 the parties shall file a Joint Supplemental Case

Management Conference Statement setting forth their proposal(s) for pretrial hearing and trial dates. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Case Management Conference Statement filed by

Defendants on November 10, 2005 is hereby STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD, and shall be

removed from the court’s electronic filing system, because it reveals the substance of confidential

settlement discussions.

Dated: 11/14/05

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:04-cv-03125-PVT Document 56 Filed 11/14/05 Page 2 of 2