Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01563/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01563-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1563

DOREEN SHING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WAL MART CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District 

Judge. (1:16-cv-00322-CCB)

Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 1, 2016

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Doreen Shing, Appellant Pro Se. Rachelle Elizabeth Hill, Kevin 

Michael Kraham, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1563 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Doreen Shing appeals the district court’s order dismissing 

her complaint alleging violations of the Americans with 

Disabilities Act for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Shing v. Wal Mart Corp., No. 1:16-cv-00322-CCB (D. Md. 

May 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1563 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 2