Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-07160/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-07160-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 

---

-1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., 

LTD., a Taiwan R.O.C. corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ASETEK DANMARK A/S,

Defendant.

Case No.: 3:16-CV-07160-JST

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 

DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Claim Construction Hearing:

Date: December 19, 2017

Time: 1:30 p.m.

Courtroom 9

AND ALL RELATED 

COUNTERCLAIMS

Hubert H. Kuo (SBN 204036) William L. Buus (SBN 180059)

ARDENT LAW GROUP, PC SCHIFFER & BUUS, APC

2301 Dupont Dr., Ste. 510 3070 Bristol St., Ste. 530

Irvine, CA 92612 Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Tel: (949) 863-9782 Tel: (949) 825-6140

Fax: (949) 863-9783 Fax: (949) 825-6141

Email: hkuo@ardentlawgroup.com Email: wbuus@lexopusfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD.

Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)

Robert.McCauley@Finnegan.com

Arpita Bhattacharyya (pro hac vice)

Arpita.Bhattacharyya@finnegan.com

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

3300 Hillview Ave.

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203 

Tel: (650) 849-6600 

Fax: (650) 849-6666

Attorneys for Defendant ASETEK DANMARK A/S

Case 3:16-cv-07160-JST Document 90 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 4
-2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

At the request of Plaintiff and Counter-defendant Asia Vital Components 

Co., Ltd.’s (“AVC”) counsel, AVC and Defendant and Counterclaimant Asetek 

Danmark A/S’s (“Asetek”) respectfully stipulate, with the Court’s permission, to 

extend the remaining briefing due dates for AVC’s Responsive Claim Construction 

Brief and Asetek’s Reply to AVC’s Claim Construction Brief, as provided for in the 

following table (“Deadlines Table”). These proposed changes will not affect the 

claim construction hearing date and will provide the Court with over one month to 

consider the fully briefed claim construction positions: 

Event Current Date Proposed New 

Date

Deadline to file Responsive Claim 

Construction Brief (Local Rule - 14 Days 

after Opening Brief)

October 13, 

2017

October 27, 

2017

Deadline to file Reply in Support of 

Opening Claim Construction Brief (Local 

Rule - 7 days after Responsive Brief)

October 20, 

2017

November 10, 

2017

Claim Construction Hearing (continued by 

the Court per Dkt. No. 88) December 19, 

2017 – 1:30 p.m.

Unchanged.

This Court recently continued the Claim Construction Hearing from 

November 17, 2017 to December 19, 2017. AVC’s counsel is currently in the 

process of moving offices to a new location. The extended deadline will allow 

counsel to have more time to properly draft AVC’s claim construction brief. 

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and request through their respective 

counsel of record to extend the due dates as set forth in the Deadlines Table. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that the remaining 

due dates for the claim construction briefing shall be extended as provided for in 

the Deadlines Table. 

Case 3:16-cv-07160-JST Document 90 Filed 10/05/17 Page 2 of 4
-3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

//

//

//

ATTESTATION 

 Counsel for AVC hereby attests by his signature below that concurrence in 

the filing of this document was obtained from counsel for Asetek Danmark A/S. 

SCHIFFER & BUUS, APC 

Dated: October 4, 2017 By: /s/ William L. Buus 

William L. Buus 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant 

ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD. 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

Dated: October 4, 2017 By: /s/ Arpita Bhattacharyya 

 

Robert F. McCauley 

Arpita Bhattacharyya 

Attorneys for Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant ASETEK DANMARK A/S 

Case 3:16-cv-07160-JST Document 90 Filed 10/05/17 Page 3 of 4
-4- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

October 5, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-07160-JST Document 90 Filed 10/05/17 Page 4 of 4