Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04232/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04232-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

STIPULATION EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND HEARING DATES Case No. C-05-4232 JF (HRL) 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAURA THOMPSON, ESQ. (State Bar No. 219999)

2370 Market Street, Suite 318

San Francisco, CA 94114

Telephone: (415) 264-8423

Facsimile: (415) 558-9688

Email: lthompsonesq@comcast.net

MATTHEW STAVISH

BERENATO, WHITE & STAVISH, LLC

6550 Rock Spring Drive, Suite 240

Bethesda, Maryland 20817

Telephone: (301) 896-0600

Facsimile: (301) 

Email: mstavish@bwsiplaw.com

LEAD ATTORNEY – PRO HAC VICE

Attorneys for Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

PHASE FORWARD INCORPORATED,

a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MARY NOEL ADAMS, individually and 

d/b/a PHASE FORWARD,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 05-4232 JF (HRL)

APPLICATION, STIPULATION, 

DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND 

MOTION CUT OFF DATES

APPLICATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, plaintiff Phase Forward Incorporated and defendant 

Mary Noel Adams (hereinafter, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby 

request that the Court amend the existing Scheduling Order adopted on June 2, 2006, and extend 

by 30 days (1) the date on which discovery in this action is to be completed; (2) the last day for 

the parties to file expert reports; (3) the last day for the parties to file rebuttal expert reports; (4) 

**E-filed 7/7/06**

Case 5:05-cv-04232-JF Document 41 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 5
STIPULATION EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND HEARING DATES Case No. C-05-4232 JF (HRL) 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the date on which expert discovery will close; (5) the last day for the filing of motions for 

summary judgment or partial summary judgment; and (6) the date set for motion hearing.

DECLARATION

I, LAURA THOMPSON, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the state of California. I have personal 

knowledge of the facts set forth herein, unless otherwise indicated, and if called as a witness 

could and would so testify.

2. On June 2, 2006, the Court adopted the Parties’ discovery schedule proposed in its 

stipulated motion to extend discovery dates by 30-days, and issued an Order re-setting the 

motion hearing date, as follows:

Task/Action Adopted Schedule

Close of Fact Discovery July 3, 2006

Last Day to File Expert Reports August 1, 2006

Last Day to File Rebuttal Expert Reports August 31, 2006

Close of Expert Discovery October 31, 2006

Motion Hearing Date January 19, 2007 at 9 a.m.

3. The Parties identified and conferred about deposition scheduling early in the discovery 

schedule, but have experienced ongoing difficulties coordinating counsel and witness availability 

despite diligent efforts. Defendant has yet to depose Plaintiff’s Rule 26(a) witnesses, namely, 

Robert K. Weiler, Paul Bleicher, Ari Buchler, William Porter, Steve Powell and Lynette 

Herscha. Matthew Stavish (Defendant’s lead attorney) is informed that Kelly Tillery (Plaintiff’s 

counsel) is available to attend these depositions is the week of July 17, 2006, earliest, and that 

Plaintiff has asked his client to provide dates/times starting that week in which these witnesses 

will be available. Observing the July 3, 2006 discovery cut-off and Civil Local Rule 26-2, the 

Parties agreed to a further 30-day discovery extension so that Defendant is afforded the 

Case 5:05-cv-04232-JF Document 41 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 5
STIPULATION EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND HEARING DATES Case No. C-05-4232 JF (HRL) 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

opportunity to depose the witnesses identified, and provide both Parties the time needed to 

complete their factual investigations.

4. Due to the extended weekend afforded the July 4th holiday, and July 3rd office closures, I 

was unable to reach Plaintiff’s counsel of record or person of similar authority to formally 

execute this stipulated motion. However, I have been informed of the Parties’ agreement as set 

forth in this Declaration, and so signed and timely filed to carry out our mutual intent.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 

true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and that this Declaration was executed at San 

Francisco, California, on this 3rd day of July, 2006.

Laura Thompson

STIPULATION

For the reasons set forth above, the Parties stipulate to a 30 day extension of the 

discovery and motion cut-off dates adopted by the Court on June 2, 2006, and June 5, 2006, 

respectively, and jointly request that this Court approve the following modified schedule:

Task/Action Adopted Schedule Modified Schedule

Close of Fact Discovery July 3, 2006 August 2, 2006

Last Day to File Expert Reports August 1, 2006 September 1, 2006

Last Day to File Rebuttal Expert reports August 31, 2006 October 2, 2006

Close of Expert Discovery October 31, 2006 November 30, 2006

Last day to File Motions for Summary 

Judgment and Partial Summary Judgment December 1, 2006 January 2, 2007

Motion Hearing Date January 19, 2007 at 

9 a.m.

30 day extension, in 

deference to the 

Court’s calendar

Case 5:05-cv-04232-JF Document 41 Filed 07/07/06 Page 3 of 5
STIPULATION EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND HEARING DATES Case No. C-05-4232 JF (HRL) 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: July 3, 2006 LAURA THOMPSON, ESQ.

By:/s/Laura Thompson

Laura Thompson

Attorney for Defendant

MARY NOEL ADAMS

Dated: July ___, 2006 PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP

By:/s/

Spencer Martinez

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PHASE FORWARD INCORPORATED

Case 5:05-cv-04232-JF Document 41 Filed 07/07/06 Page 4 of 5
PROOF OF SERVICE [STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND] – Case No. C-05-4232 JF (HRL) 5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

July ___, 2006

United States District Court Judge

Judge Jeremy Fogel

7

Case 5:05-cv-04232-JF Document 41 Filed 07/07/06 Page 5 of 5