Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-00444/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-00444-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 06cv0444

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAHOMY MARTINEZ, by his Guardian Ad

Litem Lucio Martinez,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 06cv0444 DMS (NLS)

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PETITION FOR

COMPROMISE OF DISPUTED

CLAIM OF MINOR 

vs.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a Public Entity

of the State of California; Mark Ritchie,

Shawn Aitken, San Diego County Sheriff’s

Deputies, individually and as County of San

Diego Sheriff’s Deputies; DOES 1 through

10,

Defendants.

On August 21, 2006, Lucio Martinez, Guardian ad Litem for Plaintiff Dahomy Martinez, filed

a Petition for Compromise of Disputed Claim of Minor. Defendants have not filed an opposition to

the petition, and their time for doing so has expired. The Court scheduled a hearing on the petition

for September 22, 2006. However, in the absence of any opposition, the Court finds the matter

suitable for submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Accordingly,

the hearing date of September 22, 2006, is vacated.

The Court has reviewed the Petition, and denies it without prejudice for failure to include the

following information: 

(1) Verification by Petitioner under penalty of perjury; 

(2) An original or a photocopy of all doctors’ reports containing a diagnosis for the injury,

Case 3:06-cv-00444-DMS-NLS Document 18 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 06cv0444

and a report of the claimant’s present condition;

(3) A statement of whether Petitioner is a claimant against the recovery of the minor and,

if so, whether the pendency or disposition of Petitioner’s claim on his own behalf has in any

way affected the proposed compromise of the claim; 

(4) The name and address of the proposed depository for the settlement funds; and

(5) A statement of whether notice of the action or claim has been given under Welfare and

Institutions Code Section 14124.73. See Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 7.950. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 15, 2006

DANA M. SABRAW

United States District Judge

cc: all parties

Judge Stormes

Case 3:06-cv-00444-DMS-NLS Document 18 Filed 09/15/06 Page 2 of 2