Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05983/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05983-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND J. MANZANILLO,

Plaintiff,

v.

GREGORY D. LEWIS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 12-cv-05983-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings August 24, 20151

Fact discovery cut-off March 4, 2016

Expert disclosures March 25, 2016

Expert rebuttal April 8, 2016

Expert discovery cut-off April 29, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions June 17, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due September 13, 2016

 

1

This deadline having already passed, any amendment to the pleadings will require a showing of 

good cause. 

Case 3:12-cv-05983-JST Document 168 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Pretrial conference September 23, 2016

at 2:00 p.m.

Trial October 17, 2016 at 

8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) Six

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

A further case management conference is scheduled for January 20, 2016 at 2:00PM. The 

parties shall file an updated case management statement by January 6, 2016.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 23, 2015

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:12-cv-05983-JST Document 168 Filed 09/23/15 Page 2 of 2