Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06345/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06345-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2003 Job Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Eugene T. Franklin [SBN: 124881]

Barbara F. Green [SBN: 150320]

Franklin Employment Law Group

Attorneys at Law

22762 Main Street

Hayward, California 94541

(510) 538-0969

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Kirk Cooper 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Kirk M. Cooper, 

Plaintiff,

v.

Alameda Contra Costa County Transit

District and Does 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 06-06345 MHP 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

 Plaintiff Kirk M. Cooper (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and Defendant Alameda Contra Costa County

Transit District (hereinafter “Defendant”) through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

 1. The original case management dates were issued based on the original complaint filed by plaintiff

on October 10, 2006;

 2. Plaintiff retained counsel, and counsel filed a first amended complaint on November 29, 2006;

 3. Defendant filed its answer timely on February 27, 2007.

Given that defendant has only recently filed its answer, the parties request that the scheduled March 5,

2007, case management conference be continued to one of the below dates at the convenience of the

court:

 April 23th, April 30 , May 7 or June 4. th th

Case 3:06-cv-06345-MHP Document 8 Filed 03/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

THE PARTIES RESPECTFULLY request that the court continue the March 5, 2007, case

management conference to one of the above dates. 

Dated: March 1, 2007 FRANKLIN EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP

 /s/

 By: _________________________________

 Eugene T. Franklin

 Attorney For Plaintiff

Dated: March 1, 2007 ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTS TRANSIT DISTRICT

 /s/ 

 By: 

CATHLEEN A. WADHAMS 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 

 ORDER

 Good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED that the case management conference is herewith

continued to _______________________.

Dated: ___________________

 _______________________________

 MARILYN HALL PATEL

 U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

4/30/2007 at 4:00 p.m. 3/2/2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-06345-MHP Document 8 Filed 03/02/07 Page 2 of 2