Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-05398/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-05398-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1 [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. 5:08-CV-05398 JF 

Daniel J. O’Connor (Pro Hac Vice) 

Edward K. Runyan (Pro Hac Vice) 

BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP 

One Prudential Plaza 

130 East Randolph Drive 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Telephone: +1 312 861 8000 

daniel.j.oconnor@bakernet.com 

edward.k.runyan@bakernet.com 

Tod L. Gamlen (SBN 83458) 

BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP 

660 Hansen Way 

Palo Alto, CA 94303-1044 

Telephone: +1 650 856 2400 

tod.l.gamlen@bakernet.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BARCO N.V. 

John L. Cooper (SBN 050324) 

jcooper@fbm.com 

Jeffrey M. Fisher (SBN 155284) 

jfisher@fmb.com 

Farella Braun & Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 954-4400 

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 

Attorney for Defendants 

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED 

and ALLIACENSE LIMITED 

Charles T. Hoge, Esq. (SBN 110696) 

choge@knlh.com 

Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge 

35 Tenth Avenue 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: (619) 231-8666 

Facsimile: (619) 231-9593 

Attorney for Defendants 

PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

BARCO N.V., a Belgian corporation 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LTD., 

PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORP., and 

ALLIACENSE LTD., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 5:08-CV-05398 JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER 

WHEREAS on February 22, 2010 this Court entered an Order Following Case 

Management Conference (D.I. 148) establishing a schedule for this action (“Scheduling Order”); 

WHEREAS on February 26, 2010, the case styled Sirius XM Radio v. Technology 

Properties Limited et al, Case No. C10-00816 EDL (N.D. Cal.) (“Sirius Action”) was transferred 

to the Northern District of California from the Southern District of New York; 

------------------

Case 5:08-cv-05398-PSG Document 82 Filed 05/19/10 Page 1 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2 [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. 5:08-CV-05398 JF 

WHEREAS the Sirius Action involves all of the patents in this action; 

WHEREAS the parties in the Sirius Action have filed a joint motion under Civil 

Local Rule 3-12 to consider Whether Cases Should Be Related and Requesting Modification of 

Existing Case Schedule (“Motion”), seeking to have the Sirius Action deemed related to this 

action and assigned to the Honorable Jeremy Fogel for further proceedings; 

WHEREAS the Motion also seeks entry of a proposed schedule similar to the one 

adopted in the Scheduling Order, but with the dates adjusted by an average of 3-4 weeks; 

WHEREAS the parties to this action have met and conferred and have agreed 

that, in the interests of judicial economy and to conserve judicial and party resources, the 

Scheduling Order in this action should be modified to match the dates set forth in the schedule 

proposed for the Sirius Action, as follows: 

Event Scheduling Order 

Date 

New [Proposed] 

Date 

Last day to serve amended disclosure 

of asserted claims and infringement 

contentions (and related documents) 

for United States Patent No. 5,809,336 

(“the ‘336 patent”) 

April 19, 2010 April 30, 2010 

Last day to serve amended invalidity 

contentions (and related documents) 

June 3, 2010 June 30, 2010 

Last day to exchange list of “Proposed 

terms and Claim Elements for 

Construction” for the ‘336 patent 

June 25, 2010 July 23, 2010 

Last day to exchange “Preliminary 

Claim Constructions and Extrinsic 

Evidence” for the ‘336 patent 

June 25, 2010 August 30, 2010 

Last day to file joint claim construction 

and pre-hearing statement 

July 16, 2010 September 21, 2010 

Claim construction discovery cut-off August 13, 2010 October 19, 2010 

Defendants’ opening claim 

construction brief 

August 27, 2010 November 2, 2010 

Case 5:08-cv-05398-PSG Document 82 Filed 05/19/10 Page 2 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3 [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. 5:08-CV-05398 JF 

Event Scheduling Order 

Date 

New [Proposed] 

Date 

Plaintiffs’ responsive claim 

construction brief 

September 10, 2010 November 30, 2010 

Defendants’ reply claim construction 

brief 

September 17, 2010 December 14, 2010 

Patent Technology Tutorial* *If requested by the 

Court 

Approximately 20 days 

after reply claim 

construction brief 

*If requested by the 

Court 

Approximately 20 

days after reply claim 

construction brief 

Claim construction hearing To be determined To be determined 

Status conference Three weeks after the 

claim construction 

hearing 

Three weeks after the 

claim construction 

hearing 

Defendants to serve willfulness 

documents; opinion of counsel 

50 days after the claim 

construction ruling 

50 days after the claim 

construction ruling 

Close of fact discovery Six months after the 

final invalidity 

contentions 

Six months after the 

final invalidity 

contentions 

Initial expert reports 30 days after the close 

of fact discovery 

30 days after the close 

of fact discovery 

Rebuttal expert reports 30 days after the initial 

expert reports 

30 days after the initial 

expert reports 

Close of expert discovery Two weeks after the 

rebuttal expert reports 

Two weeks after the 

rebuttal expert reports 

Trial To be determined To be determined 

Case 5:08-cv-05398-PSG Document 82 Filed 05/19/10 Page 3 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 4 [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. 5:08-CV-05398 JF 

THEREFORE, the parties hereby respectfully request that the Court adopt the 

following schedule for this action:: 

Event Date 

Last day to serve amended disclosure of asserted 

claims and infringement contentions (and related 

documents) for United States Patent No. 5,809,336 

(“the ‘336 patent”) 

April 30, 2010 

Last day to serve amended invalidity contentions 

(and related documents) 

June 30, 2010 

Last day to exchange list of “Proposed terms and 

Claim Elements for Construction” for the ‘336 

patent 

July 23, 2010 

Last day to exchange “Preliminary Claim 

Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence” for the ‘336 

patent 

August 30, 2010 

Last day to file joint claim construction and prehearing statement September 21, 2010 

Claim construction discovery cut-off October 19, 2010 

Defendants’ opening claim construction brief November 2, 2010 

Plaintiffs’ responsive claim construction brief November 30, 2010 

Defendants’ reply claim construction brief December 14, 2010 

Patent Technology Tutorial* *If requested by the Court 

Approximately 20 days after reply 

claim construction brief 

Claim construction hearing To be determined 

Status conference Three weeks after the claim 

construction hearing 

Defendants to serve willfulness documents; opinion 

of counsel 

50 days after the claim construction 

ruling 

Close of fact discovery Six months after the final invalidity 

Case 5:08-cv-05398-PSG Document 82 Filed 05/19/10 Page 4 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 5 [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. 5:08-CV-05398 JF 

Event Date 

contentions 

Initial expert reports 30 days after the close of fact 

discovery 

Rebuttal expert reports 30 days after the initial expert 

reports 

Close of expert discovery Two weeks after the rebuttal expert 

reports 

Trial To be determined 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 30, 2010 BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP 

By: /s/ Edward Runyan 

Edward K. Runyan 

Attorney for Plaintiff Barco NV 

Dated: April 30, 2010 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP 

By: /s/ John Cooper

John L. Cooper 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED 

and ALLIACENSE LIMITED 

Case 5:08-cv-05398-PSG Document 82 Filed 05/19/10 Page 5 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 6 [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. 5:08-CV-05398 JF 

Dated: April 30, 2010 KIRBY NOONAN LANCE & HOGE 

By: /s/ Charles Hoge

Charles T. Hoge 

Attorneys for Defendants 

PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED: 

 

Dated: 

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

United States District Judge 

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that 

all parties have concurred in the filing of this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] AMENDED 

SCHEDULING ORDER. 

DATED: April 30, 2010 BAKER & MCKENZIE, LLP 

By: s/ Edward Runyan

 Edward K. Runyan 

5/17/10

Case 5:08-cv-05398-PSG Document 82 Filed 05/19/10 Page 6 of 6