Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02569/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02569-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RODNEY DIAL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SCOTT HEATLEY, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:12-cv-2569 AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In response to this court’s order filed January 22, 

2015, defendants informed the court that plaintiff is now incarcerated at the California 

Correctional Health Care Facility (CHCF) in Stockton, California, and that his deposition was 

completed there on January 14, 2015. See ECF No. 57. Review of the Inmate Locator website 

operated by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation indicates that plaintiff 

remains incarcerated at CHCF.1 

//// 

//// 

 

1

 See http://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/. This Court may take judicial notice of facts that are 

capable of accurate determination by sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. 

Fed. R. Evid. 201; see also City of Sausalito v. O'Neill, 386 F.3d 1186, 1224 n.2 (9th Cir. 2004) 

(“We may take judicial notice of a record of a state agency not subject to reasonable dispute.”). 

Case 2:12-cv-02569-AC Document 59 Filed 03/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, although plaintiff has not filed a notice of change of address,2 the Clerk of 

Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to telephone CHCF forthwith to identify which facility plaintiff is 

assigned, and therefore the mailing address that the Clerk shall then note on the docket as 

plaintiff’s current address of record, including for purposes of serving the instant order. 

 Further, on February 12, 2015, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment in this 

action. Plaintiff’s opposition was due on or before March 5, 2015. See Local Rule 230(l). 

Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, 

within twenty-one days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve an 

opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to 

comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to 

prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

DATED: March 13, 2015 

 

2

 Parties proceeding in pro se are under a continuing duty to notify the court of any address 

change, and failure to do so provides grounds for dismissal. See Local Rules 182(f), 183(b). 

Case 2:12-cv-02569-AC Document 59 Filed 03/13/15 Page 2 of 2