Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06596/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06596-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

* 2

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP

Matthew P. Vafidis (California Bar No. 103578)

50 California Street, 28* Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415)743-6900

Facsimile: (415)743-6910

E-mail: matthew.vafidis(^hk]a.w.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendant on the Counterclaim

DQ TECHNOLOGY, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DQ TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Plaintiff,

vs.

)• No. C 06-06596 MHP

)

)

WILLIAM J. MURPHY, an individual; and ) STIPULATION AND

JERRY MCINNES, an individual, ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL

) OF ACTION WTTH PREJUDICE

Defendants. ) Rule 41(»X1)> Fed. R. Civ. P.

WILLIAM J. MURPHY, an individual;

Counter-Claimant,

vs.

DQ TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Counter-Defendant,

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff and

Defendant on the Counterclaim DQ Technology, Inc. ("DQ"), Defendant and Counter-Claimant

William J. Murphy ("Murphy") and Defendant Jerry Mclnnes ("Mclnnes") ("the Parties"

collectively, and "Party" individually) hereby stipulate and agree, as follows:

The Parties have agreed upon a confidential settlement of this entire action that is

satisfactory to all Parties. As such, the above-captioned action, including all of the claims and

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

No. C 06-06596 MHP

-ICase 3:06-cv-06596-MHP Document 26 Filed 05/04/07 Page 1 of 2
^ •?

-*•

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the counterclaim brought therein, shall be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Rule 41(a)(l). Each Party will bear its own costs and attorneys' fees in this action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: April$& 2007 HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP

-^^^ju, t

Dated: April 2 2007

Matthew P. Vafidis

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendant on

the Counterclaim

DQ TECHNOLOGY, INC.

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

Dated: Apri$Q> 2007

Attorneys for Defendant

JERRY MCINNES

BARNETT BROOKS & ASSOCIATES, LLC

Barnett Q. Brooks

Attorneys for Defendant and

Counterclaimant WILLIAM J. MURPHY

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: , 2007

The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel

United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OP ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

No. C 06-06596 MHP

— 2 -

May 3

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-06596-MHP Document 26 Filed 05/04/07 Page 2 of 2