Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01064/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01064-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Tony Hernandez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On November 12, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation to deny 

Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiff’s surreply, deny Defendants’ motion for judgment on the 

pleadings, and deny Defendants’ motion for severance. (ECF No. 42.) The Findings and 

Recommendations were served on both parties and contained notice that objections were to be filed 

within thirty days. The thirty day time frame has expired and no objections were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

TONY HERNANDEZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

M. MARTINEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01064-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE 

SURREPLY, DENYING MOTION FOR 

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, DENYING 

MOTION FOR SEVERANCE, AND DIRECTING 

DEFENDANTS TO FILE FURTHER RESPONSE 

TO COMPLAINT WITHIHN THIRTY DAYS

[ECF Nos. 32, 34, 41, 42]

Case 1:10-cv-01064-SAB Document 43 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on November 12, 2014, is adopted in full; 

and

2. Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiff’s surreply is DENIED;

3. Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED, to renewal by way of a 

motion for summary judgment; 

4. Defendants’ motion for severance is DENIED, without prejudice; and

5. Defendants shall file a further response to the operative complaint within thirty (30) 

days from the date of service of this order. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 31, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01064-SAB Document 43 Filed 01/05/15 Page 2 of 2