Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-00420/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-00420-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIFFANY PON

Plaintiff, No.09-0420-PJH (EDL)

v. ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON 

DISCOVERY MOTIONS

PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC.

Defendant.

___________________________________/

The Court is currently scheduled to hear: (1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Quash Subpoena

and that Deposition Not Be Held; (2) Defendant’s Motion Challenging the Sufficiency of Plaintiff’s

Responses to Defendant’s Requests for Admission; and (3) Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery

Responses and Production of Documents on Friday, April 2, 2010. On March 22, 2010, Counsel for

Plaintiff filed a request for a 30 day extension of time to oppose Defendant’s motions, to allow him time

to recover from very recent heart surgery. Upon consideration of the request, the Court finds good cause

for extending the briefing schedule and continuing the hearings on all three motions. 

Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that a hearing will be held on (1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Order

to Quash Subpoena and that Deposition Not Be Held; (2) Defendant’s Motion Challenging the

Sufficiency of Plaintiff’s Responses to Defendant’s Requests for Admission; and (3) Defendant’s

Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Production of Documents on April 28, 2010. Plaintiff’s

Oppositions to Defendant’s motions and Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s motion shall be

due on April 20, and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Oppositions shall be due on April 23.

Enforcement of the subpoena of Kimberly Foreman is hereby stayed pending the Court’s ruling on

Plaintiff’s motion to quash. To the extent possible, the parties are ordered to meet and confer regarding

Case 4:09-cv-00420-PJH Document 57 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the issues raised in Defendant’s motions to determine if each of them requires resolution by this Court,

and will notify the Court as soon as possible if any issues become moot in the interim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 23, 2010 _______________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:09-cv-00420-PJH Document 57 Filed 03/23/10 Page 2 of 2