Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02943/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02943-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL ROBINS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2943 JKS DAD P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed March 11, 2008, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and

plaintiff was granted until April 21, 2008 to file an amended complaint along with a completed

application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee. On May 13, 2008,

plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days to comply with the court’s order. Plaintiff was

cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

The time period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, has not filed

a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, has not paid the appropriate filing fee, and

has not otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110 (E.D. Cal. 1997); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

/////

Case 2:06-cv-02943-JKS-DAD Document 20 Filed 06/30/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 30, 2008.

DAD:lg

robi2943.fifp.fta(2)

Case 2:06-cv-02943-JKS-DAD Document 20 Filed 06/30/08 Page 2 of 2