Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-00223/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-00223-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES MARTIN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-99-0223 WBS GGH P

vs.

S.L. HUBBARD, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

On October 5, 2006, this court filed an order setting the briefing schedule upon a 

Ninth Circuit mandate, filed in this court on September 29, 2006. On December 6, 2006,

respondent filed a motion to vacate the order, attaching exhibits demonstrating that the Ninth

Circuit had withdrawn the mandate as issued in error, by a filing dated September 28, 2006, but

not filed in this court’s docket of the case. Respondent’s exhibits also included a copy of the

Ninth Circuit’s October 10, 2006, grant of a stay of the mandate, also not separately filed in this

court’s docket. Respondent is correct that the withdrawal and stay of the mandate removed

jurisdiction from this court, which necessarily had the effect of vacating this court’s briefing

order. 

On December 15, 2006, the Ninth Circuit mandate remanding this matter was refiled in this court, renewing the previously withdrawn/stayed mandate. 

Case 2:99-cv-00223-WBS-GGH Document 83 Filed 02/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Respondent’s December 6, 2006, motion to vacate the briefing order, filed on

October 6, 2006, is granted, nunc pro tunc;

2. Pursuant to a renewed mandate from the Ninth Circuit, filed in this court on

December 15, 2006, respondent is now directed to file a response to those issues which remain,

Claims 3, 4, and two of the three subparts of Claim 6, of the Fourth Amended Petition, within 60

days;

3. If respondent’s response is in the form of an answer, petitioner must file any

reply (traverse) within 45 days of the filing of the answer; if it is in the form of a motion, the

opposition is due within 45 days of the filing thereof. If an opposition is filed to a motion, any

reply by respondent is due within 30 days thereafter. 

DATED: 2/5/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

mart0223.rmd2

Case 2:99-cv-00223-WBS-GGH Document 83 Filed 02/05/07 Page 2 of 2