Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00310/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00310-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES E. SMITH,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCRIBNER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-00310-AWI-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL

(Doc. 25)

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF,

FOR MANDAMUS, AND TO COMPEL

(Doc. 13, 14, 18, 20, 28)

Plaintiff James E. Smith (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 25, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the

Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. 

To date, plaintiff has not filed any objection to the Magistrate

Case 1:06-cv-00310-AWI-LJO Document 30 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis. It shall be

adopted in full, and plaintiff’s motions for preliminary

injunctive relief, for mandamus, and to compel shall be denied.

On March 15, 2007, plaintiff filed another motion seeking a

writ to sue the State of Washington, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1651. Plaintiff’s motion is groundless and shall be denied. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 25,

2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief,

for mandamus, and to compel, filed September 20, 2006, December

11, 2006, December 26, 2006, and March 15, 2007, are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00310-AWI-LJO Document 30 Filed 03/22/07 Page 2 of 2