Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00913/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00913-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT CRUZ, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0913 GEB DAD P

vs.

DR. S. HAND, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed October 27, 2005, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and

thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. On January 5, 2006, plaintiff

was granted an additional thirty days to file a second amended complaint and was cautioned that

no further extensions of time will be granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:05-cv-00913-GEB-DAD Document 25 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 15, 2006.

DAD:lg

cruz0913.fta

Case 2:05-cv-00913-GEB-DAD Document 25 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2