Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05564/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05564-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES

Case No.: C 09-05564 MHP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Michele Ballard Miller (SBN 104198)

 mbm@millerlawgroup.com

Janine S. Simerly (SBN 102361)

 jss@millerlawgroup.com

Claudia J. Castillo (SBN 215603)

 cjc@millerlawgroup.com

MILLER LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

111 Sutter Street, Suite 700

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel. (415) 464-4300

Fax (415) 464-4336

Attorneys for Defendant

McCORMICK & SCHMICK RESTAURANT 

CORP. (also erroneously sued as “SPENGER’S 

FRESH FISH GROTTO”)

Robert Salinas (SBN 184260)

 bob@ssrplaw.com

Jorge Aguilar II (SBN 238111)

 jaguilar@ssrplaw.com

SUNDEEN SALINAS & PYLE

1330 Broadway Street, Suite 1830

Oakland, CA 94612

Tel. (510) 663-9240

Fax (510) 663-9241

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IVAN CORNEJO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IVAN CORNEJO,

Plaintiff,

v.

SPENGER’S FRESH FISH GROTTO, 

MCCORMICK AND SCHMICK 

RESTAURANT CORP., and DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

Case No.: C 09-05564 MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES

Date: March 8, 2010

Time: 4:00 p.m.

Courtroom: 15

Judge: Honorable Marilyn H. Patel

Complaint filed: October 22, 2009

Case 3:09-cv-05564-MHP Document 21 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 5
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES

Case No.: C 09-05564 MHP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff IVAN CORNEJO ("Plaintiff") and Defendant McCORMICK & 

SCHMICK RESTAURANT CORP. (also erroneously sued as “SPENGER’S FRESH FISH 

GROTTO”) ("Defendant"), by and through their respective undersigned attorneys, hereby 

stipulate and agree to continue the date of the Court’s Initial Case Management Conference 

and all related dates, as well as the dates of the meet and confer and disclosures required 

by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26, as set forth below. 

WHEREAS, on November 24, 2009, the Court filed its Order Setting Initial 

Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines;

WHEREAS, on January 27, 2010, Defendant filed a Notice of Motion and 

Motion to Compel Arbitration, currently set for hearing on March 8, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. before 

the Honorable Marilyn H. Patel (Docket Nos. 8-14);

WHEREAS, on February 15, 2010,Plaintiff filed a Memorandum of Points and 

Authorities in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration, currently set for 

hearing on March 8, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. before the Honorable Marilyn H. Patel (Docket Nos. 

15-16);

WHEREAS, the parties have not previously sought to continue or extend any 

of the deadlines in this action related to the Initial Case Management Conference and 

related dates, or disclosures required by Rule 26; 

WHEREAS, the Court’s Order on Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration 

may render the Rule 26 requirements moot if the parties are required to arbitrate this matter, 

and counsel for the parties agree that it would facilitate efficient and expeditious Rule 26 

disclosures, consideration of ADR options, and general scheduling in this action, to modify 

Case 3:09-cv-05564-MHP Document 21 Filed 02/18/10 Page 2 of 5
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES

Case No.: C 09-05564 MHP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

the current deadlines including the date set for the Initial Case Management Conference 

and related dates.

NOW, THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and 

Defendant, by and through their respective undersigned attorneys of record, to continue the 

date set by the Court for the Initial Case Management Conference as well as all related 

dates, including the dates related to the parties’ meet and confer in accordance with FRCP 

Rule 26 and the parties’ consideration and selection of an ADR process, as follows:

March 15, 2010 Last day for parties to meet and confer re initial 

disclosures, early settlement, ADR process 

selection, and discovery plan;

March 29, 2010 Last day for parties to file Rule 26(f) Report, 

complete initial disclosures or state objection in 

Rule 26(f) Report and file Joint Case Management 

Conference Statement per Standing Order.

April 5, 2010

4:00 p.m.

Initial Case Management Conference in 

Courtroom 15, San Francisco at 4:00 p.m.

Good cause exists for this continuance of the existing date of the Initial Case 

Management Conference and related deadlines, including the date of the parties’ meet and 

confer in accordance with FRCP Rule 26 and the parties’ consideration and selection of an 

ADR process Rule, as set forth above. 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:09-cv-05564-MHP Document 21 Filed 02/18/10 Page 3 of 5
4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES

Case No.: C 09-05564 MHP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February 16, 2010 SUNDEEN SALINAS & PYLE

By: /s/

Jorge Aguilar II

Attorneys for Plaintiff IVAN CORNEJO

Dated: February 16, 2010 MILLER LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/

Janine S. Simerly

Attorneys for Defendant 

McCORMICK & SCHMICK RESTAURANT 

CORP. (also erroneously sued as 

“SPENGER’S FRESH FISH GROTTO”)

Case 3:09-cv-05564-MHP Document 21 Filed 02/18/10 Page 4 of 5
5

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES

Case No.: C 09-05564 MHP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

ORDER

Having reviewed the Stipulation executed by Plaintiff IVAN CORNEJO and 

Defendant McCORMICK & SCHMICK RESTAURANT CORP., and good cause appearing, 

the Court hereby orders that the Initial Case Management Conference and associated 

dates, including the deadlines for the parties’ meet and confer in accordance with FRCP 

Rule 26 and the parties’ consideration and selection of an ADR process, are VACATED, 

and are rescheduled as set forth below. 

March 15, 2010 Last day for parties to meet and confer re initial 

disclosures, early settlement, ADR process 

selection, and discovery plan;

March 29, 2010 Last day for parties to file Rule 26(f) Report, 

complete initial disclosures or state objection in 

Rule 26(f) Report and file Joint Case Management 

Conference Statement per Standing Order.

April 5, 2010

4:00 p.m.

Initial Case Management Conference in 

Courtroom 15, San Francisco at 4:00 p.m.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

The Honorable Marilyn H. Patel

United States District Court Judge

4850-3492-8133, v. 1

2/17/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-05564-MHP Document 21 Filed 02/18/10 Page 5 of 5