Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01219/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01219-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The plaintiff named his filing “Delete & Stay Unexhausted Claim & Amended

Petition.” (See Docket No. 23.) The text of this document describes plaintiff’s non-opposition

to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations filed March 28, 2005.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHANDRA KISHOR,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-03-1219 LKK CMK 

vs.

TOM L. CAREY,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 28, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Instead, both parties have filed

statements of non-opposition.1

Case 2:03-cv-01219-LKK -CMK Document 25 Filed 09/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 28, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed without

prejudice.

DATED: September 16, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-01219-LKK -CMK Document 25 Filed 09/16/05 Page 2 of 2