Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01791/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01791-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 150
Nature of Suit: Overpayments &amp; Enforcement of Judgments
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 

STIPULATION TO ALLOW DEPOSITIONS IN TWO CASES 

Herrig & Vogt, LLP Attorneys at Law 

4210 Douglas Blvd., Ste. 100, Granite Bay, CA 95746-5902

GEORGE F. VOGT, JR. (State Bar #107310) 

RYAN P. MOORE (State Bar #252716) 

HERRIG & VOGT, LLP 

4210 Douglas Blvd., Ste 100 

Granite Bay, CA 95746 

Telephone: (916) 960-1000 

Facsimile: (916) 960-1005 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, PERFORMANCE 

EXCAVATORS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PERFORMANCE EXCAVATORS, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, TENAX 

CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 20, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. CV 07-01791-LEW-JFM 

STIPULATION TO ALLOW DEPOSITIONS 

IN TWO CASES 

 Plaintiff PERFORMANCE EXCAVATORS, INC. (hereinafter “PEI”) and Defendants ARCH 

INSURANCE COMPANY (“hereinafter “ARCH”) and TENAX CORPORATION (hereinafter 

“TENAX”), by and through their attorneys hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

 Whereas on or about May 21, 2007, PEI filed an Arbitration complaint with the State of 

California, Office of Administrative Hearings (the Arbitration), in which it named CHICO 

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (hereinafter “RDA”) and THE BARBER-WEBB COMPANY 

(hereinafter “BARBER- WEBB”) as Respondents. 

 Whereas, PEI is a Plaintiff in the instant lawsuit in which TENAX and ARCH are Defendants. 

 Whereas, the parties agree that the Arbitration and the Federal Court action may involve the 

Case 2:07-cv-01791-JAM -JFM Document 35 Filed 04/14/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 - 2 -

STIPULATION TO ALLOW DEPOSITIONS IN TWO CASES 

same and/or similar operative facts and therefore, in the interests of judicial economy, desire to take 

the deposition of TENAX in both actions and the deposition of one of TENAX’s employees in both 

action, and review their documents in both actions. 

 Whereas, the parties are willing to allow a single deposition be taken of TENAX and a single 

one of its employees. 

 Now, therefore, it is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between the parties herein, through 

their respective attorneys of record, as follows: 

1. The parties shall be permitted to take the deposition of TENAX and one of its 

employees on April 22, 2008, and April 23, 2008, at Saul Ewing law office, located at 

500 East Pratt Street, Suite 900, Baltimore, Maryland, pursuant to the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California. 

(CAN BE SIGNED IN COUNTERPARTS VIA FACSIMILE OR E-MAIL) 

 

DATED: _________________ Herrig & Vogt, LLP 

By:___________/s/__________________________ 

 George F. Vogt, Jr. 

 Attorneys for Performance Excavators, Inc. and 

 Zurich North American

DATED: _________________ 

/// 

Treadwell & Anderson

By:_____________/s/________________________

 Mark A. Treadwell 

 Attorney for Defendant Barber-Webb Company, 

 Incorporation and Arch Insurance Company 

DATED: _________________ Keesal, Young & Logan 

By:______________/s/_______________________

 Gordon C. Young 

 Attorneys for Tenax Corporation 

Case 2:07-cv-01791-JAM -JFM Document 35 Filed 04/14/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 - 3 -

STIPULATION TO ALLOW DEPOSITIONS IN TWO CASES 

ORDER

 IT IS SO ORDRED. 

Dated: April 11, 2008 

/s/ Ronald S. W. Lew________________

 Judge of the United States District Court 

 Eastern District of California 

Case 2:07-cv-01791-JAM -JFM Document 35 Filed 04/14/08 Page 3 of 3