Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00048/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00048-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN O’CONNELL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0048 LKK KJM PS

vs.

UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS

ADMINISTRATION, et al.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned based on Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Calendared for hearing on July 12, 2006 is defendants’ motion to dismiss. No opposition to the

motion has been filed. 

Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party

will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to

the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may

be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

Case 2:06-cv-00048-LKK -KJM Document 21 Filed 06/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

inherent power of the Court.”

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of July 12, 2006 is vacated. Hearing on defendants’ motion is

continued to August 9, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion no later than July 26, 2006. 

Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of nonopposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: June 29, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

oconnell.nop

Case 2:06-cv-00048-LKK -KJM Document 21 Filed 06/29/06 Page 2 of 2