Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03832/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03832-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26:6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty

---

Dr 

STIPULATION RE: SEPTEMBER 2, 2005 CMC -1- 

Case No. C-04-03832 RMW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

KEVIN V. RYAN (California State Bar No. 118321) 

United States Attorney 

JAY R. WEILL (California State Bar No. 75434) 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Chief, Tax Division 

DAVID L. DENIER (California State Bar No. 95024) 

Assistant United states Attorney 

 10th Floor Federal Building 

 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 

 San Francisco, California 94102 

 Telephone: (415) 436-6888 

Attorneys for the United States of America 

THOMAS R. HOGAN, SBN 042048

LESLIE HOLMES, SBN 192608 

MARK V. BOENNIGHAUSEN, SBN 142147 

HOGAN HOLMES & USOZ LLP 

333 WEST SANTA CLARA STREET, SUITE 800 

SAN JOSE, CA 95113 

TELEPHONE: (408) 292-7600 

FACSIMILE: (408) 292-7611 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY CO., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. C-04-03832-RMW 

STIPULATION RE CONTINUING 

SEPTEMBER 2, 2005 CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

ORDER 

Though the parties have made substantial progress in reaching agreememnt on the 

*E-FILED - 9/1/05*

Case 5:04-cv-03832-RMW Document 43 Filed 09/01/05 Page 1 of 2
 Dr 

STIPULATION RE: SEPTEMBER 2, 2005 CMC -2- 

Case No. C-04-03832 RMW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

amount of damages in this action as contemplated by the Courtís August 5, 2005 order, they still 

need more time to complete their negotiations and analysis. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY 

AGREED AND STIPULATED between plaintiff and defendant, by their attorneys of record, that 

the date for the Case Management Conference in this action be continued from Friday, September 2, 

2005 until Friday, October 14, 2005. The parties now expect to complete a damage stipulation

prior to this new date, thereby allowing the court to vacate that date. 

Dated: 9/ _1__2005 

KEVIN V. RYAN 

United States Attorney 

__s/David Denier___ 

DAVID L. DENIER 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Tax Division 

Dated: 9/__1__/2005 

___s/Mark Boennighausen________ 

LESLIE HOLMES 

MARK V. BOENNIGHAUSEN 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties Case Management Conference is continued until 

October 14, 2005, unless the parties submit a stipulation on damages prior to that date in which

case the conference will be vacated and a judgment entered in the case. 

Dated: __________ ___________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

9/1/05

Case 5:04-cv-03832-RMW Document 43 Filed 09/01/05 Page 2 of 2