Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01969/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01969-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1969

THE COUNTY OF GRAYSON, VIRGINIA; RICHARD VAUGHN, in his 

Official Capacity as Sheriff of Grayson County; THE COUNTY 

OF CARROLL, VIRGINIA,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

JOHN T. SPANE; DALE W. SUTPHIN,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

RA-TECH SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief

District Judge. (7:13-cv-00384-GEC)

Submitted: June 19, 2015 Decided: July 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cullen Dennis Seltzer, SANDS ANDERSON PC, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellants. Gregory D. Habeeb, Monica Taylor Monday,

Appeal: 14-1969 Doc: 32 Filed: 07/02/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Daniel R. Sullivan, GENTRY, LOCKE, RAKES & MOORE, Roanoke, 

Virginia, for Appellee John T. Spane.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1969 Doc: 32 Filed: 07/02/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing 

their fraud in the inducement claims against John T. Spane and 

Dale W. Sutphin. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Cnty. Of Grayson v. Spane, No. 

7:13-cv-00384-GEC (W.D. Va. May 29, 2014). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-1969 Doc: 32 Filed: 07/02/2015 Pg: 3 of 3