Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-90-06083/USCOURTS-ca10-90-06083-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 

---

• I FILED 

United States Coun of Appeals 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 'rl"nth (fr,-,1ir 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

JONEY JOE LUSTY, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v. 

RON CHAMPION, Warden, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

MAR 2 2 1991 

&OBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 90-6083 

(D.C. No. CIV 88-1078-R) 

(W.D. Oklahoma) 

Before LOGAN, MOORE, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

Petitioner Joney Joe ~-usty, a state prisoner, appeals from 

the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of 

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 u.s.c. S 2254. In his request for 

habeas relief, petitioner sought to have his conviction overturned 

because (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to 

* 

be 

for 

res 

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Appellate Case: 90-6083 Document: 010110031298 Date Filed: 03/22/1991 Page: 1 
prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; and (2) he failed to 

receive effective assistance of counsel. 

The district court's memorandum opinion filed January 31, 

1990, dealt fully, fairly, and correctly with each of the issues 

raised by petitioner. Upon our review of the record, we affirm 

for substantially the reasons stated therein. 

AFFIRMED. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

-2-

Entered for the Court 

James K. Logan 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 90-6083 Document: 010110031298 Date Filed: 03/22/1991 Page: 2