Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-131/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

THIS ORDER PERTAINS TO ALL CASES.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL No. 1917

Case No. C-07-5944-SC

ORDER SETTING STATUS

CONFERENCE

Given the scale and history of this case, the Court finds it 

necessary to convene the principal parties and lawyers for a 

hearing on the progress of the case and the prospects for its 

efficient resolution.

All principal parties and lawyers are hereby ORDERED to appear 

before the undersigned at 10:00 AM on September 13, 2013, at the 

United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California, Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San 

Francisco, California 94102. 

No later than one week before the hearing date, the parties 

should file with the Court statements of no more than five pages, 

briefly discussing their positions in this case (e.g., whom they 

are suing or defending against, in which related or consolidated 

cases they are involved, and the postures of any relevant motions, 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1758 Filed 07/02/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

progress of settlement discussions, etc.). 

Attendance is mandatory. Joint statements and court 

appearances are acceptable if the relevant parties agree to them. 

If a party believes it has a valid excuse for not being present and 

represented at the hearing, it should file a notice explaining the 

reasons for its absence, no later than one week before the hearing 

date. The Court will rule on these notices' sufficiency.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 2, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1758 Filed 07/02/13 Page 2 of 2