Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02463/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02463-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. and Order Ext. Time re Mot. to Dismiss CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02463-WHO

Computerlaw Group LLP

www.computerlaw.comsm

Jack Russo (Cal. Bar No. 96068)

Christopher Sargent (Cal. Bar No. 246285)

COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP

401 Florence Street

Palo Alto, CA 94301

(650) 327-9800

(650) 618-1863 fax

jrusso@computerlaw.com

csargent@computerlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GEOVECTOR CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GEOVECTOR CORPORATION, a California 

corporation,

Plaintiff;

v.

SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., a New 

Jersey corporation;

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 

Korean corporation;

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

a New York corporation;

SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS 

AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company; and

SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA, INC., a 

California corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:16-cv-02463-WHO

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME 

TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY REGARDING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Date: October 19, 2016

Time: 2:00 PM

Presiding: Hon. William H. Orrick

Complaint Filed: May 5, 2015

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 3:16-cv-02463-WHO Document 25 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. and Order Ext. Time re Mot. to Dismiss 1 CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02463-WHO

Computerlaw Group LLP

www.computerlaw.comsm

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

This Stipulation is entered into by Plaintiff GeoVector Corporation (originally CritiCom 

Corporation, hereinafter “GeoVector,” or “Plaintiff,”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., 

Ltd. (“SEC”), Samsung International, Inc. (“SII”), Samsung Research America, Inc. (“SRA”), 

and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”) (collectively, “Samsung,” or “Defendants”) by 

their respective counsel.1

RECITALS

1. On May 5, 2016, Plaintiff filed its Original Complaint in the instant action. 

2. On May 6, 2016, the Court scheduled the initial case management conference for 

August 3, 2016. 

3. On May 13, 2016, Plaintiff served SEA with the Summons and Original 

Complaint. 

4. On June 7, 2016, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint. 

5. Plaintiff agreed to an extension of time for the Defendants to respond to the 

Complaint by 90 days in exchange for SEC’s agreement to accept or otherwise waive service of 

the Summons and Complaint such that the Defendants’ response to the First Amended Complaint 

is due on the same date. 

6. On June 13, 2016, the Honorable Donna M. Ryu signed a Stipulation and Order 

that contained the 90-day extension and continued the Case Management Conference from 

August 3, 2016 to September 21, 2016. 

7. On September 2, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss First Amended 

Complaint in Part (the “Motion”). 

8. For the past two weeks, lead counsel for Plaintiff, Mr. Jack Russo, has been ill and 

is overseas. 

 

1

The First Amended Complaint also lists Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (“STA”) 

as a Defendant. Samsung has moved to dismiss STA as an improperly named Defendant, as STA 

merged into SEA prior to the filing of the Original Complaint. [Dkt. No. 14]. Samsung reserves 

the right to move to remove any other improperly-named parties at a later date. 

Case 3:16-cv-02463-WHO Document 25 Filed 09/16/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. and Order Ext. Time re Mot. to Dismiss 2 CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02463-WHO

Computerlaw Group LLP

www.computerlaw.comsm

STIPULATION

In light of Mr. Russo’s illness, the parties agree that time schedule for the Opposition and 

Reply on the Motion be modified as follows: 

A. The Deadline to File the Opposition to the Motion be changed from September 16, 

2016 to September 23, 2016: 

B. The Deadline to file the Reply in Support of the Motion be changed from 

September 23, 2016 to October 7, 2016. 

Respectfully submitted,

COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP

Dated: September 14, 2016 By: /s/ Christopher Sargent 

Jack Russo

Christopher Sargent

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GEOVECTOR CORPORATION

PAUL HASTINGS LLP

Dated: September 14, 2016 By: /s/ Elizabeth L. Brann 

Elizabeth L. Brann

On Behalf of Defendants

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC. and

SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA, INC.

Case 3:16-cv-02463-WHO Document 25 Filed 09/16/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. and Order Ext. Time re Mot. to Dismiss 3 CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02463-WHO

Computerlaw Group LLP

www.computerlaw.comsm

ORDER

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint in Part 

shall be filed no later than September 23, 2016. 

Defendants’ Reply in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss First Amended 

Complaint in Part shall be filed no later than October 7, 2016. 

Dated: September 16, 2016 ______________________________________ 

Hon. William H. Orrick 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:16-cv-02463-WHO Document 25 Filed 09/16/16 Page 4 of 4