Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00650/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00650-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEAVON PIERCE,

Plaintiff,

v.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:15-cv-00650 LJO DLB PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF 

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A 

CLAIM

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

Plaintiff Seavon Pierce (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on 

November 12, 2014, in the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of California. The matter was designated as a civil rights action. Plaintiff filed a First 

Amended Complaint on December 9, 2014. He filed a Second Amended Complaint on December 

15, 2014. On April 28, 2015, the case was transferred to the Fresno Division. In his Second 

Amended Complaint, Plaintiff named as Defendants: President Barack Obama, the U.S. 

Government, California Department of Corrections, California Inspector General, California 

Internal Affairs, and California Director of Corrections. 

On October 5, 2015, the Court screened the Second Amended Complaint and determined it 

failed to state a claim. The Second Amended Complaint was dismissed with leave to file a Third 

Amended Complaint. Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file the Third Amended Complaint. 

Case 1:15-cv-00650-DAD-DLB Document 33 Filed 11/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Over thirty (30) days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Plaintiff was 

forewarned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in the action being dismissed 

with prejudice for failure to state a claim.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the case be DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. 

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District 

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

fourteen (14) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may 

file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 13, 2015 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00650-DAD-DLB Document 33 Filed 11/13/15 Page 2 of 2