Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05848/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05848-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1333 Admiralty

---

1

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Stip Re Amended TPC.doc STIP. RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED TPC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

ROBERTS & KEHAGIARAS LLP 

CAMERON W. ROBERTS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 176682) 

cwr@tradeandcargo.com

ANDREW D. KEHAGIARAS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 207767) 

adk@tradeandcargo.com

5777 West Century Boulevard, Suite 1410 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

Telephone: (310) 642-9800 

Facsimile: (310) 868-2923 

Attorneys for defendant and third-party plaintiff 

SEA TRADE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

SEA TRADE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________

SEA TRADE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

 Third-Party 

Plaintiff,

 vs. 

COSCO CONTAINER LINES CO., 

LTD.; COSCO CONTAINER LINES 

AMERICAS, INC.; COSCO LOGISTICS 

(AMERICAS) INC.; INTERMODAL 

BRIDGE TRANSPORT, INC.; UNION 

PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; and 

ROES 1 through 10, inclusive, 

 Third-Party 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV 07 5848 EDL 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: LEAVE FOR SEA TRADE 

INTERNATIONAL, INC. TO FILE A 

FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY 

COMPLAINT

[Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2)] 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 1 of 16
2

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Stip Re Amended TPC.doc STIP. RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED TPC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

 COME NOW defendant and third-party plaintiff Sea Trade 

International, Inc. (“Sea Trade”) and third-party defendants 

COSCO Container Lines Co., Ltd., COSCO Container Lines 

Americas, Inc., COSCO Logistics (Americas) Inc., and Intermodal 

Bridge Transport, Inc. (collectively, the “COSCO Entities”) and 

hereby stipulate to the Court’s grant of leave to Sea Trade to 

file a first amended third-party complaint. A true and correct 

copy of Sea Trade’s proposed first amended third-party 

complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” 

 As counsel for Sea Trade stated to the Court at the 

initial case management conference of February 26, 2008, Sea 

Trade investigated the propriety of the dismissal of then 

third-party defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“UP”), 

based on its counsel’s representations that UP did not 

transport the subject cargo. Counsel for Sea Trade learned 

that UP did not transport the subject cargo from Portland, 

Oregon to Tacoma, Washington, and that in fact, that 

transportation was not by rail at all. Counsel for Sea Trade 

learned that the aforementioned inland transportation was by 

truck, and that the motor carrier was proposed third-party 

defendant Edgmon & Son Trucking LLC (“Edgmon”). 

 Based on the foregoing, Sea Trade’s first amended thirdparty complaint set forth the identical causes of action and it 

will still name the COSCO Entities, and in addition, it will 

name Edgmon as a third-party defendant. UP will no longer be a 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 2 of 16
3

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Stip Re Amended TPC.doc STIP. RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED TPC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

third-party defendant, further to the parties’ stipulation to 

dismiss UP under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), which Sea Trade filed on April 14, 2008. 

Dated: April 16, 2008 ROBERTS & KEHAGIARAS LLP 

By: ____________________________ 

Andrew D. Kehagiaras 

Attorneys for defendant and 

third-party plaintiff SEA TRADE 

INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Dated: April 16, 2008 KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN

By: ____________________________ 

Margaret A. DeGooyer 

Attorneys for third-party 

defendants COSCO CONTAINER LINES 

CO., LTD., COSCO CONTAINER LINES 

AMERICAS, INC., COSCO LOGISTICS 

(AMERICAS) INC., and INTERMODAL 

BRIDGE TRANSPORT, INC. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Good cause appearing, the Court hereby grants leave to Sea 

Trade to file a first amended third-party complaint, which Sea 

Trade shall do within three Court days of this order. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________, 2008 ____________________________ 

Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 3 of 16
April 21 U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 4 of 16
EXHIBIT “A” 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 5 of 16
1

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Third-Party Complaint--ii.doc FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

ROBERTS & KEHAGIARAS LLP 

CAMERON W. ROBERTS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 176682) 

cwr@tradeandcargo.com

ANDREW D. KEHAGIARAS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 207767) 

adk@tradeandcargo.com

5777 West Century Boulevard, Suite 1410 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

Telephone: (310) 642-9800 

Facsimile: (310) 868-2923 

Attorneys for defendant and third-party plaintiff 

SEA TRADE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SOMPO JAPAN INSURANCE, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

SEA TRADE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________

SEA TRADE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

 Third-Party 

Plaintiff,

 vs. 

COSCO CONTAINER LINES CO., 

LTD.; COSCO CONTAINER LINES 

AMERICAS, INC.; COSCO LOGISTICS 

(AMERICAS) INC.; INTERMODAL 

BRIDGE TRANSPORT, INC.; EDGMON 

& SON TRUCKING LLC; and ROES 1 

through 10, inclusive, 

 Third-Party 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV 07 5848 EDL 

SEA TRADE INTERNATIONAL, INC.’S 

FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY 

COMPLAINT

[Fed. R. Civ. P. 14(a), (c)] 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 6 of 16
2

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Third-Party Complaint--ii.doc FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

 COMES NOW defendant and third-party plaintiff Sea Trade 

International, Inc. (“Sea Trade”) and alleges as follows: 

JURISDICTION

 1. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over this 

first amended third-party complaint because third-party 

defendants COSCO Container Lines Co., Ltd., COSCO Container 

Lines Americas, Inc., COSCO Logistics (Americas) Inc., 

Intermodal Bridge Transport, Inc., and/or Edgmon & Sons 

Trucking LLC are or may be liable to Sea Trade or Sompo Japan 

Insurance, Inc. (“Sompo”) for all or part of the claims 

asserted against Sea Trade in Sompo’s complaint (the 

“complaint”) in the above-captioned action. See Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 14(a) and (c), 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). 

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

 2. Sea Trade is, and at all material times herein was, a 

corporation duly organized and existing according to law. 

 3. Sea Trade is informed and believes, and thereon 

alleges, that third-party defendant COSCO Container Lines Co., 

Ltd. is, and at all times relevant herein, was a business 

entity authorized to do business or doing business in this 

Judicial District and/or in interstate and international 

commerce.

 4. Sea Trade is informed and believes, and thereon 

alleges, that third-party defendant COSCO Container Lines 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 7 of 16
3

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Third-Party Complaint--ii.doc FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

Americas, Inc. is, and at all times relevant herein, was a 

business entity authorized to do business or doing business in 

this Judicial District and/or in interstate and international 

commerce.

 5. Sea Trade is informed and believes, and thereon 

alleges, that third-party defendant COSCO Logistics (Americas) 

Inc. is, and at all times relevant herein, was a business 

entity authorized to do business or doing business in this 

Judicial District and/or in interstate and international 

commerce.

 6. Sea Trade is informed and believes, and thereon 

alleges, that third-party defendant Intermodal Bridge 

Transport, Inc. is, and at all times relevant herein, was a 

business entity authorized to do business or doing business in 

this Judicial District and/or in interstate and international 

commerce.

 7. Sea Trade is informed and believes, and thereon 

alleges, that third-party defendant Edgmon & Sons Trucking LLC 

is, and at all times relevant herein, was a business entity 

authorized to do business or doing business in this Judicial 

District and/or in interstate and international commerce. 

 8. Sea Trade does not know the true names and capacities 

of the third-party defendants sued herein as Roes 1 through 10, 

inclusive. Sea Trade will amend or seek leave to amend its 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 8 of 16
4

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Third-Party Complaint--ii.doc FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

third-party complaint to allege said third-party defendants’ 

true names and capacities as soon as Sea Trade ascertains the 

same.

 9. Sea Trade is informed and believes, and thereon 

alleges, that at all times mentioned herein, third-party 

defendants COSCO Container Lines Co., Ltd., COSCO Container 

Lines Americas, Inc., COSCO Logistics (Americas) Inc., 

Intermodal Bridge Transport, Inc., Edgmon & Sons Trucking LLC, 

and Roes 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them, were and 

have been agents, servants, employers, and/or employees of each 

of the other third-party defendants, and each of them, as such, 

were acting in the course and scope of their employment and/or 

agency at all times relevant to this action. 

 10. Sompo has filed its complaint in this Court against 

Sea Trade alleging that it has caused damage to Sompo. Sea 

Trade has responded to Sompo’s complaint by denying any 

liability on its part and by asserting various affirmative 

defenses.

 11. Sea Trade is informed and believes, and thereon 

alleges, that third-party defendants COSCO Container Lines Co., 

Ltd., COSCO Container Lines Americas, Inc., COSCO Logistics 

(Americas) Inc., Intermodal Bridge Transport, Inc., Edgmon & 

Sons Trucking LLC, and Roes 1 through 10, inclusive 

(collectively, the “Third-Party Defendants”), were negligent or 

in breach of contract or in some other actionable manner 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 9 of 16
5

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Third-Party Complaint--ii.doc FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

legally responsible for the events and happenings referred to 

in Sompo’s complaint, and for proximately causing the damages 

and/or loss incurred by Sompo, as it has alleged in its 

complaint. Accordingly, Sea Trade demands relief for itself, 

as set forth herein and/or judgment against the Third-Party 

Defendants and in favor of Sompo. 

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

Indemnification Against the Third-Party Defendants

 12. Sea Trade realleges and incorporates by reference 

paragraphs 1 through 11, inclusive, of its first amended thirdparty complaint. 

 13. Sea Trade is informed and believes, and thereon 

alleges, that it is in no way responsible for the injuries or 

damages alleged in Sompo’s complaint. But if Sea Trade is 

nevertheless found liable under any legal theory for any 

damages or injuries alleged in the complaint, then Sea Trade is 

informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the negligent 

or other actionable conduct or activity of the Third-Party 

Defendants, and each of them, was active, primary, and 

affirmative, and that any negligent or other actionable conduct 

or activity on the part of Sea Trade, if any, was, at most, 

only passive, derivative, and secondary. 

 14. Accordingly, if Sea Trade is held liable for any part 

of the claims asserted against it, Sea Trade is entitled to 

total indemnification from the Third-Party Defendants, and each 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 10 of 16
6

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Third-Party Complaint--ii.doc FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

of them, so that Sea Trade can recoup from and be reimbursed by 

the Third-Party Defendants, and each of them, any sum or sums 

that Sea Trade must pay to Sompo or to any other party to this 

action.

 15. By reason of the foregoing allegations, Sea Trade has 

incurred and/or paid expenses for the defense of the abovecaptioned lawsuit, including, but not limited to, attorneys’ 

fees, court costs, expenses, and damages. Sea Trade will also 

likely incur future additional attorneys’ fees, court costs, 

expenses, and damages by reason of any judgment or settlement 

with any party to this action. Based on the foregoing, Sea 

Trade seeks and is entitled to be indemnified and held harmless 

by the Third-Party Defendants, and each of them, for Sea 

Trade’s attorneys’ fees, court costs, expenses, and damages 

incurred, paid, and/or owing. The aforementioned expenses are 

continuing and the aggregate amount is not presently known to 

Sea Trade, which prays for leave to amend its third-party 

complaint to assert the true amount of such expenses when Sea 

Trade has finally ascertained the same. 

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

Partial Equitable Indemnification

Against the Third-Party Defendants

 16. Sea Trade realleges and incorporates by reference 

paragraphs 1 through 15, inclusive, of its first amended thirdparty complaint. 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 11 of 16
7

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Third-Party Complaint--ii.doc FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

 17. Sea Trade is informed and believes, and thereon 

alleges, that it is in no way responsible for the injuries or 

damages alleged in Sompo’s complaint. But if Sea Trade is 

nevertheless found liable under any legal theory for any 

damages or injuries alleged in the complaint, then Sea Trade is 

informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the negligent 

or other actionable conduct or activity of the Third-Party 

Defendants, and each of them, was, at least in part, the 

contributing and substantial proximate cause of Sompo’s damages 

and injuries, if any. 

 18. By reason of the foregoing allegations, Sea Trade 

will be damaged to the extent that it must pay any sum, or any 

sum in excess of its proportionate share of liability, if any, 

as assessed by the trier of fact. 

 19. Accordingly, if Sea Trade were to be held liable for 

any part of the claims asserted against it, Sea Trade would be 

entitled to partial equitable indemnification by the ThirdParty Defendants, and each of them, in proportion those 

parties’ share of the liability, so that Sea Trade would avoid 

payment of any sum or sums to Sompo or any other party, or any 

sum in excess of Sea Trade’s proportionate share of liability, 

if any. 

 20. By reason of the foregoing allegations, Sea Trade has 

incurred and/or paid expenses for the defense of the abovecaptioned lawsuit, including, but not limited to, attorneys’ 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 12 of 16
8

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Third-Party Complaint--ii.doc FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

fees, court costs, expenses, and damages. Sea Trade will also 

likely incur future additional attorneys’ fees, court costs, 

expenses, and damages by reason of any judgment or settlement 

with any party to this action. Based on the foregoing, Sea 

Trade seeks and is entitled to be indemnified and held 

harmless, at least in part, by the Third-Party Defendants, and 

each of them, for Sea Trade’s attorneys’ fees, court costs, 

expenses, and damages incurred, paid, and/or owing. The 

aforementioned expenses are continuing and the aggregate amount 

is not presently known to Sea Trade, which prays for leave to 

amend its third-party complaint to assert the true amount of 

such expenses when Sea Trade has finally ascertained the same. 

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

Contribution Against the Third-Party Defendants

 21. Sea Trade realleges and incorporates by reference 

paragraphs 1 through 20, inclusive, of its first amended thirdparty complaint. 

 22. Sea Trade is informed and believes, thereon alleges, 

that it is in no way responsible for the injuries or damages 

alleged in Sompo’s complaint. But if Sea Trade is nevertheless 

found liable under any legal theory for any damages or injuries 

alleged in the complaint, then Sea Trade is informed and 

believes, and thereon alleges, that the negligent or other 

actionable conduct or activity of the Third-Party Defendants, 

and each of them, was the contributing and substantial 

proximate cause of Sompo’s damages and injuries, if any. 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 13 of 16
9

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Third-Party Complaint--ii.doc FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

 23. By reason of the foregoing allegations, Sea Trade 

will be damaged to the extent that it must pay any sum, or any 

sum in excess of its proportionate share of liability, if any, 

as assessed by the trier of fact. 

 24. Accordingly, if Sea Trade were to be held liable for 

any part of the claims asserted against it, Sea Trade would be 

entitled to contribution by the Third-Party Defendants, and 

each of them, in proportion those parties’ share of the 

liability, so that Sea Trade would avoid payment of any sum or 

sums to Sompo’s or any other party, or any sum in excess of Sea 

Trade’s proportionate share of liability, if any. 

 25. By reason of the foregoing allegations, Sea Trade has 

incurred and/or paid expenses for the defense of the abovecaptioned lawsuit, including, but not limited to, attorneys’ 

fees, court costs, expenses, and damages. Sea Trade will also 

likely incur future additional attorneys’ fees, court costs, 

expenses, and damages by reason of any judgment or settlement 

with any party to this action. Based on the foregoing, Sea 

Trade seeks and is entitled to be indemnified and held harmless 

by the Third-Party Defendants, and each of them, for Sea 

Trade’s attorneys’ fees, court costs, expenses, and damages 

incurred, paid, and/or owing. The aforementioned expenses are 

continuing and the aggregate amount is not presently known to 

Sea Trade, which prays for leave to amend its third-party 

complaint to assert the true amount of such expenses when Sea 

Trade has finally ascertained the same.

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 14 of 16
10

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Third-Party Complaint--ii.doc FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

 WHEREAS, Sea Trade prays for judgment on its first amended 

third-party complaint as follows: 

 1. For a judgment against the Third-Party Defendants, 

and each of them, and in favor of Sompo; 

 2. For a judgment against the Third-Party Defendants, 

and each of them, by way of total indemnification for any sum 

adjudged against Sea Trade, if any, in favor of Sompo or any 

other party herein; 

 3. For a judgment against the Third-Party Defendants, 

and each of them, by way of contribution and/or partial 

equitable indemnification, according to proof of contributory 

and/or comparative liability for any sum adjudged against Sea 

Trade, if any, in favor of Sompo, or any other parties herein, 

which sum is in excess of the proportionate share of Sea 

Trade’s liability, if any, as assessed by the trier of fact; 

 4. For a judgment against the Third-Party Defendants, 

and each of them, for Sea Trade’s attorneys’ fees, court costs, 

expenses, and damages incurred in the litigation against Sompo 

and other parties, and expense and other costs of suit incurred 

herein; and 

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 15 of 16
11

Z:\Sea Trade\Bremen Bridge\Third-Party Complaint--ii.doc FIRST AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERTS 

&

KEHAGIARAS LLP 

www.tradeandcargo.com

 5. For such other and further relief as the Court deems 

just and proper. 

Dated: April __, 2008 ROBERTS & KEHAGIARAS LLP

By: ____________________________ 

Andrew D. Kehagiaras 

Attorneys for defendant and 

third-party plaintiff SEA TRADE 

INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Case 3:07-cv-05848-EDL Document 34 Filed 04/21/08 Page 16 of 16