Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02314/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02314-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERNEST LAHTI, LINDA LAHTI

AND APPLIED RESERVE

ANALYSIS, LLC, a California

Corporation,,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

DAN BLOOMQUIST, REBECCA

BLOOMQUIST, HIGHLANDS

ELECTRONICS, LLC, and

Arizona Corporation and DOES

1 through 50 inclusive,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C08-2314 BZ

ISSUES FOR ARGUMENT AND

ORDER PERMITTING DEFENDANT

TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE

A hearing on plaintiffs’ application for a temporary

restraining order is scheduled for Friday, May 9, 2008 at 

9:00 a.m. in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450

Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102. IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that the parties should be prepared to address

whether the court has authority to issue an injunction without

first conducting a hearing and making findings regarding

jurisdiction in light of defendants’ motion to dismiss. The

parties should be prepared to discuss this issue in light of

Case 3:08-cv-02314-BZ Document 12 Filed 05/08/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the holding in Enterprise Intern., Inc. v. Corporacion Estatal

Petrolera Ecuatoriana, 762 F.2d 464, 470 - 72. (5th Cir. 1985)

and the summary set forth in Schwarzer, Tashima & Wagstaffe,

Federal Civil Procedure Before Trial (2008 ed.) 

§ 13:18 - 13:21.

It is further ORDERED that defendants, who are pro se and

reside in Arizona, are given leave to appear at the hearing by

telephone. Defendants shall call the court at (415) 522-4093

tomorrow, Friday, May 9, 2008 at 9:00 a.m.

Dated: May 8, 2008

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\LAHTI V. BLOOMQUIST\Issues for Arguement and Telephonic

Appearance.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-02314-BZ Document 12 Filed 05/08/08 Page 2 of 2