Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03961/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03961-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIK DAVID SEGELSTROM, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TFLG, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-03961-JST 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

REMAINING DEFENDANTS SHOULD 

NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO 

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE 4(M)

This complaint in this case was filed on September 2, 2014. ECF No. 1. Defendant 

Nationstar, LLC appeared and filed a motion to dismiss, which the Court has granted. ECF No. 

39. The remaining Defendants named in the complaint have not been served and have not 

appeared in this action. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) instructs that “[i]f a defendant is not 

served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice 

to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that 

service be made within a specified time.” More than 120 days have elapsed since the filing of the 

complaint. 

Accordingly, good cause appearing, Plaintiffs are now ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE 

why this action should not be dismissed as to all Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 4(m). Plaintiff shall file a written response to this order by May 15, 2015. If Plaintiff 

fails to file a response, the action will be dismissed in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-03961-JST Document 48 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 1