Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01152/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01152-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL CRAIG COURTOIS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

C.D.C., et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:05-cv-01152-OWW-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 12)

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIM

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO

AMEND PETITION

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On February 17, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that Petitioner's claim challenging his conviction

arising from Humboldt County be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction;

that Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel be DENIED;

and, that Petitioner be granted leave to amend the petition

regarding his parole hearing claim. These Findings and

Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice

that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from

the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not

filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:05-cv-01152-OWW -SMS Document 16 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 17,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Petitioner’s claim challenging his conviction arising

from Humboldt County is DISMISSED from this action for lack of

jurisdiction;

3. Petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel is

DENIED; and,

4. Petitioner is GRANTED leave to amend the petition

regarding his parole hearing claim, within thirty (30) days from

the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 6, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01152-OWW -SMS Document 16 Filed 04/07/06 Page 2 of 2