Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01833/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01833-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VARIOUS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JEDI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 16-01833 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO

HAC VICE APPLICATION

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Brian Haan (Dkt. No. 45) is DENIED for failing

to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he or she

is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court

of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out

the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar

membership — such as “the bar of the State of Illinois” — is inadequate under the local rule

because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fees do not need to be paid

again, the applications cannot be processed until corrected forms are submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 12, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-01833-WHA Document 46 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 1