Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00152/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00152-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 29:0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

TERRY A. WILLS, ESQ. (SBN 133962)

COOK BROWN, LLP

555 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 425

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814

T. 916.442.3100 | F. 916.442.4227

twills@cookbrown.com

Attorneys for Defendants THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JANICE A. PARTEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

EDGAR GLOVER, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v. 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE 

UNIVERSITY, California public entity JANICE A. 

PARTEN, an individual in her individual capacity; 

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES UNION 

(CSUEU), a California corporation and labor 

organization; and DOES 1-150,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-CV-000152-SAB

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff EDGAR GLOVER (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants THE 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY (“Defendant California State University”) and 

JANICE A. PARTEN (“Defendant PARTEN”), and CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY EMPLOYER’S UNION 

(“Defendant CSUEU”) by and through their counsel of record, that the Scheduling Conference set for 

October 5, 2015 be continued for 30 days or as soon thereafter as the matter may be set. 

Case 1:15-cv-00152-SAB Document 35 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Good cause exists for the continuance as Plaintiff and Defendants California State University and 

Parten, by and through their counsel, have agreed to a two week extension of time to respond to the 

Second Amended Complaint to meet and confer in an effort to potentially avoid a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to 

dismiss. In addition, on August 31, 2015, Defendant CSUEU filed a Motion to Dismiss to the Second 

Amended Complaint for failure to state to a claim upon which relief can be granted. The motion is set to be 

heard before this court on September 30, 2015. The parties agree that the October 5, 2015 Scheduling 

Conference should be continued to allow for these operative pleading issues to be resolved. All other 

deadlines triggered by the Scheduling Conference should also be continued, to include the Rule 26(f) 

conference and Joint Scheduling Report. 

DATED: September 2, 2015 M.K. HAGEMANN, P.C.

CLAY R. WILKINSON, ESQ.

By: /s/ Clay Wilkinson

Attorneys for Plaintiff EDGAR GLOVER 

DATED: September 2, 2015 MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP 

JONATHAN YANK ESQ.

By: /s/ Jonathan Yank

Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA 

STATE UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES UNION

DATED: September 2, 2015 COOK BROWN, LLP

TERRY A. WILLS, ESQ. 

By: /s/ Terry A. Wills

Attorneys for Defendants THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF 

THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JANICE A. 

PARTEN 

Case 1:15-cv-00152-SAB Document 35 Filed 09/02/15 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, the Scheduling Conference set for October 5, 2015 will be continued for 30 days 

to November 9, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 2, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00152-SAB Document 35 Filed 09/02/15 Page 3 of 3