Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00925/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00925-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Edward Thomas (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 27, 2016. 

On January 27, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 

Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction and his related motion for an order to show cause be 

denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff, and contained notice that any 

objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (ECF No. 19 at 3). More than 

fourteen days have passed and no objections have been filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and 

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

EDWARD THOMAS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DAVE DAVEY, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00925-AWI-BAM (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR EMERGENCY 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MOTION 

FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

(ECF Nos. 7, 13, 14, 19)

Case 1:16-cv-00925-AWI-BAM Document 23 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on January 27, 2017 (Doc. No. 19) are 

adopted in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction, filed on July 15, 2016 (Doc. No. 7) and 

October 26, 2016 (Doc. No. 14), are DENIED; and 

3. Plaintiff’s motion for an order to show cause why a permanent injunction should not be 

issued, filed on October 26, 2016 (Doc. No. 13), is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 6, 2017 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00925-AWI-BAM Document 23 Filed 03/06/17 Page 2 of 2