Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06476/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06476-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS, SBN SC 9990

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX,

Social Security Administration

THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, SBN CA189450

Special Assistant United States Attorney

 333 Market Street, Suite 1500

 San Francisco, California 94105

 Telephone: (415) 977-8943

 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SHAWNA PANZICA, )

)

 Plaintiff, ) CIVIL NO. C-06-6476 PVT

)

v. ) STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY

) REMAND PURSUANT TO

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C.

Commissioner of Social Security, ) § 405(g) AND TO ENTRY OF

) JUDGMENT

 Defendant. )

______________________________)

IT IS STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Shawna Panzica (Plaintiff) and defendant Michael

J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), through their undersigned counsel of record, that

the above-entitled action shall be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further

administrative proceedings.

The parties have agreed to a voluntary remand of this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.

§ 405(g). On remand, the administrative law judge should: 1) re-evaluate the opinions of all the medical

sources and discuss the weight assigned to each opinion and in particular, the ALJ should explain the weight

given to the opinions of Drs. Smith, Murillo, and Hutchins; 2) provide a function by function analysis of

the claimant’s mental and physical residual functional capacity on and after July 17, 2004; 3) obtain

supplemental vocational expert testimony and, if warranted, pose a supplemental hypothetical question that

includes all of the claimant’s limitations; and 4) otherwise develop the record as needed and fully articulate

ORDER ON

Case 5:06-cv-06476-PVT Document 13 Filed 05/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the basis for the decision.

This stipulation constitutes a remand under the fourth sentence of § 205(g) of the Social Security

Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

Dated: May , 2007 ___/s/_____________________________

(Authorized via fax)

HARVEY P. SACKETT

Attorney for plaintiff

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney

Dated: May 3, 2007 By: /s/ Theophous Reagans

THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS

Special United States Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that this action is reversed and remanded to the 

Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings.

Dated: ___________________________ _________________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBELL

United States Magistrate Judge

5/7/07

Case 5:06-cv-06476-PVT Document 13 Filed 05/07/07 Page 2 of 2