Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-03240/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-03240-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT NANAL, INC.;

ORDER – Case No. 3:18-cv-03240-WHO - 1 -

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

GREGORY S. GILCHRIST (State Bar No. 111536)

RYAN T. BRICKER (State Bar No. 269100)

GIA L. CINCONE (State Bar No. 141668)

CALLA E. YEE (State Bar No. 306652)

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1900

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 576-0200

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300

E-Mail: ggilchrist@kilpatricktownsend.com

rbricker@kilpatricktownsend.com

gcincone@kilpatricktownsend.com

cyee@kilpatricktownsend.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LEVI STRAUSS & CO.

GEORGE E. ROBINSON (State Bar No. 236849)

LAW OFFICES OF P. STERLING KERR

2450 St. Rose Parkway, Suite 120

Henderson, Nevada 89074

Telephone: (702) 451-2055

Facsimile: (702) 451-2077

E-Mail: george@sterlingkerrlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant

NANAL, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,

Plaintiff,

v.

DORSAZ, INC. and NANAL, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:18-cv-03240-WHO

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

AS TO DEFENDANT NANAL, INC.; 

ORDER

Complaint filed May 31, 2018

Judge: Honorable William H. Orrick

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), in light of the settlement of all 

matters in controversy between Plaintiff Levi Strauss & Co. (“LS&Co.”) and Defendant Nanal, Inc. 

(“Nanal”), LS&Co. and Nanal hereby jointly stipulate to dismissal without prejudice of all claims in 

/ / /

Case 3:18-cv-03240-WHO Document 22 Filed 12/12/18 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT NANAL, INC.;

ORDER – Case No. 3:18-cv-03240-WHO - 2 -

this action asserted by LS&Co. against Nanal, and thereby move for an order dismissing Nanal from 

this action, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

Dated: December 12, 2018 Respectfully submitted,

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

By:

Ryan T. Bricker

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LEVI STRAUSS & CO.

Dated: December 12, 2018 LAW OFFICES OF P. STERLING KERR

By:

George E. Robinson

Attorneys for Defendant

NANAL, INC.

ATTESTATION REGARDING SIGNATURES

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory.

Ryan T. Bricker

/s/ Ryan T. Bricker

/s/ Ryan T. Bricker

/s/ George E. Robinson

Case 3:18-cv-03240-WHO Document 22 Filed 12/12/18 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT NANAL, INC.;

ORDER – Case No. 3:18-cv-03240-WHO - 3 -

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS ORDERED that all claims asserted by Plaintiff Levi Strauss & 

Co. against Defendant Nanal, Inc., are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its 

own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2018

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

71340684V.1

Case 3:18-cv-03240-WHO Document 22 Filed 12/12/18 Page 3 of 3