Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00027/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00027-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

Bryan Cave LLP 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

C022167/0322255/1118191.1\0347502.2 

BRYAN CAVE LLP 

Daniel Rockey, California Bar Number 178604 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 675-3400 

Facsimile: (415) 675-3434 

E-Mail: daniel.rockey@bryancave.com 

Sharon K. Brown, California Bar Number 176706 

120 Broadway, Suite 300 

Santa Monica, CA 94105 

Telephone: (310) 576-2100 

Facsimile: (310) 576-2200 

Email: browns@bryancave.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., for itself and as successor by merger to Chase Home Finance LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO BRANCH 

Jeffrey Lanini and Krista Lanini

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

JP MORGAN CHASE, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION,; CHASE HOME 

FINANCE, LLC; CHASE 

FULFILLMENT SERVICES, 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:13-CV-00027-KJM-JFM

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 

ORDER 

Complaint Filed: January 5, 2013 

Trial Date: August 8, 2016 

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 74 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 11
Bryan Cave LLP 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

STIPULATION 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs 

JEFFREY LANINI and KRISTA LANINI (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., for itself and as successor by merger to Chase 

Home Finance LLC (“Chase”), through their counsel, that all documents and 

information produced in this action that are designated as “Confidential Materials” 

as defined in the Stipulated Protective Order and that are disclosed in discovery 

responses, depositions or by other means in this action, shall be used only for 

purposes of this action, and shall be kept confidential and shall not be published, 

used or made available for any other purpose. 

 Plaintiffs and Chase through their counsel of record, do hereby agree and 

stipulate with respect to the following facts: 

A. During this litigation, non-parties may be subpoenaed and parties may 

be requested to provide documents and testimony which non-parties or parties 

consider to be confidential or highly sensitive business information or trade secrets, 

or private financial or other highly personal information, the public disclosure of 

which may prejudice the competitive interests of businesses or unduly invade the 

privacy interests of individuals. 

NOW, THEREFORE it is hereby stipulated: 

1. “Confidential Materials” subject to protection under this Order shall be 

the documents, information and testimony designated by parties or non-parties as 

“CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” in accordance with 

paragraphs 2, 3 and 5 of this Order. The types of materials that may be so 

designated include, but are not limited to: 

(a) Loan documents or account information related to 8770 

Brockway Vista Avenue, Kings Beach, California 96148 that are 

not otherwise publicly available; 

(b) Certain documents, electronically stored information (“ESI”), 

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 74 Filed 04/27/16 Page 2 of 11
Bryan Cave LLP 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

and other things produced or otherwise disclosed, including all 

copies thereof that are not otherwise publicly available; 

(c) Certain interrogatory answers, discovery responses, affidavits, or 

other appendices or exhibits thereto, served or produced in this 

action, including all copies thereof; and 

(d) Certain testimony given in this action by any person at 

deposition, including all transcript copies thereof. 

2. Confidential Materials in documentary form shall be designated by 

writing or stamping “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” 

on the documents. Confidential Materials in ESI form shall be designated by either 

(a) electronically flagging them in an agreed field if such documents are produced in 

a litigation database format (and electronically watermarking them if the database 

software permits), or (b) designating them by individual bates-number in a separate 

letter or spreadsheet. If original documents or ESI are made available for 

inspection, the originals of Confidential Materials need not be marked 

“CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” but the copies of the 

originals that the inspecting party selected to be provided to the inspecting party 

shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” In 

the event that the producing party inadvertently fails to designate a document or ESI 

as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” prior to its 

production, the producing party may subsequently make such designation by 

notifying the other parties in writing as soon as practicable. Upon receiving such 

written notice, the other parties shall place the appropriate “CONFIDENTIAL –

 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” designation on the document or ESI and 

shall treat it as subject to this Order. 

3. Confidential Materials in the form of testimony shall be so designated 

as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” by counsel (or pro 

se Plaintiff) on the record prior to the time that the deposition is adjourned, or in 

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 74 Filed 04/27/16 Page 3 of 11
Bryan Cave LLP 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3

writing within thirty (30) days after counsel’s (or pro se Plaintiff’s) receipt of the 

transcript of the deposition. 

4. Confidential Materials designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT 

TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” shall not be given, shown, made available, 

communicated, or disclosed by anyone other than the person or entity producing the 

Confidential Materials to persons or entities other than: 

(a) The attorneys of record in this action, the associated attorneys at 

their firms, their staff members working on the action, and inside 

counsel; 

(b) The named parties to this action, including their officers and 

employees; 

(c) The Court, in accordance with paragraphs 7 of this Order; 

(d) Stenographic reporters engaged for depositions or other 

proceedings necessary to the conduct of the action; 

(e) Third-party reprographic service providers retained to facilitate 

production of documents for discovery, reproduction of 

pleadings for service and filing in this action, or for preparation 

of exhibits for trial, provided however that a confidentiality 

agreement providing the same or broader protection as this Order 

exists between the parties, or the third-party reads a copy of this 

Order and agrees in writing to abide by it, by executing a copy of 

the Agreement that is Exhibit A to this Order; 

(f) For deposition witnesses designated pursuant to Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure Rule 30(b)(6), Confidential Materials that were 

produced by the organization or entity by which the witness has 

been designated, and that concern the subjects for which the 

witness has been designated; 

(g) Deposition witnesses who produced, created, or received the 

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 74 Filed 04/27/16 Page 4 of 11
Bryan Cave LLP 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4

Confidential Materials that are shown to such witness; 

(h) Other deposition witnesses, but only if counsel (or pro se 

Plaintiffs) believe that it is necessary to show Confidential 

Materials to such a witness, and only on the condition that before 

any such witness is shown or receives any Confidential 

Materials, s/he must read a copy of this Order and agree in 

writing to abide by it, by executing a copy of the Agreement that 

is Exhibit A to this Order; 

(i) Independent consultants and/or experts retained by a party to 

work on the action, provided, however, that before any such 

consultant or expert is shown or receives any Confidential 

Materials, s/he must read a copy of this Order and agree in 

writing to abide by it, by executing a copy of the Agreement that 

is Exhibit A to this Order; and 

(j) Such persons as the undersigned counsel shall mutually consent 

to in writing prior to the proposed disclosure. 

5. The parties agree to use the designation of confidentiality judiciously 

and in good faith. If after receipt of a production of documents a receiving party 

determines that a document or ESI contains that party’s Confidential information 

but has not been so designated by the producing party, the receiving party may 

subsequently make such designation by notifying the other parties in writing as soon 

as practicable. Upon receiving such written notice, the other parties shall place the 

appropriate “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” 

designation on the document or ESI and shall treat it as subject to this Order. 

6. If a party disputes the designation of confidentiality made pursuant to 

the provisions set forth herein, the party may request a release of confidentiality 

from the designating party. If confidentiality is not released in writing within ten 

days, the receiving party may apply to the Court pursuant to paragraph 14 for an 

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 74 Filed 04/27/16 Page 5 of 11
Bryan Cave LLP 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

5

order releasing confidentiality. 

7. If a party files or lodges with the Court any Confidential Materials that 

reveal or contain the Confidential information of any party, the documents shall be 

filed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 141, in sealed envelopes that set out the 

information required by Civil Local Rule 141, shall prominently display the notation 

“DOCUMENT SUBMITTED UNDER SEAL,” and shall contain a statement that 

the contents are subject to the terms of this Protective Order. To the extent that a 

conflict exists between the procedures for filing or lodging sealed records set forth 

in Local Rule 141 and this Order, the Local Rules shall govern. 

 This protective order does not entitled the parties to file confidential 

information under seal. Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be 

followed and the standard that will be applied when a party seeks permission from 

the court to file material under seal. 

8. Confidential Materials shall be used solely for the preparation, trial, 

appeal, and/or settlement of this action, and shall not be communicated or used for 

any other purpose whatsoever. Furthermore, no person or entity shall give, disclose, 

make available, or communicate Confidential Materials to any person or entity not 

expressly authorized by this Order to receive such Confidential Materials. A party’s 

use for any purpose of his/her/its own documents and other information which the 

party produces or discloses in this action shall not be considered a violation of this 

Order. 

9. Where only a portion of a document or deposition transcript contains 

Confidential material, the discovering party shall cooperate to the extent reasonable 

and practical to segregate the Confidential portion in a separate document or 

transcript. Any deposition testimony that is to be deemed Confidential must be 

designated as such, in writing, no more than 15 days after receipt of the deposition 

transcript. 

10. Counsel for any party may exclude from the room during a deposition 

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 74 Filed 04/27/16 Page 6 of 11
Bryan Cave LLP 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

6

or request that the Court exclude from the room during a hearing, trial or other 

proceeding, any person (other than the witness who is then testifying) who is not 

entitled under this Order to receive Confidential Materials. Confidential Materials 

shall not be disclosed to the witness then testifying except in strict conformity with 

the provisions of this Order. 

11. Any court reporter or transcriber who reports or transcribes testimony 

in this action that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO 

PROTECTIVE ORDER” shall agree that such testimony is and shall remain 

confidential, that such testimony shall not be disclosed by such reporter or 

transcriber except to counsel and any other persons who are present while such 

testimony is being given, and that any transcript, reporter’s notes or any other 

transcription records shall be held in absolute confidentiality and safekeeping by 

such reporter or transcriber. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, paragraph 11 

does not apply to the reporting of proceedings before the Court. 

12. Nothing herein shall prevent disclosure beyond the terms of this Order 

if the parties consent to such disclosure or if the Court, after notice to all affected 

parties, orders such disclosure. 

13. Within 60 days after the final termination of the action, including all 

appeals, all Confidential Materials, all copies of the same, and all excerpts 

therefrom, shall be returned to the producing party, or destroyed by the receiving 

party; provided, however, that counsel for the parties may retain for their files a 

copy of any pleadings, memoranda, affidavits, orders, transcripts, discovery 

responses, and work product containing or reflecting Confidential Materials. If a 

receiving party elects to destroy Confidential Materials as provided in this paragraph 

rather than return them to the producing party, the receiving party shall certify that 

fact in a writing that is served upon the producing party within the 60-day time 

period. 

14. This Order is without prejudice to the rights of any party to seek 

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 74 Filed 04/27/16 Page 7 of 11
Bryan Cave LLP 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

7

modification of its provisions, or different or additional protections for specific 

materials, upon motion duly noticed and served. Upon motion duly noticed and 

served, any party may seek judicial review of any designation made pursuant to 

paragraphs 2, 3 or 5, above. Upon such a motion, it shall be the burden of the party 

making the designation to show that the Confidential Material at issue was properly 

designated. 

15. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this Order 

and to make such modifications and additions to this Order as the Court may from 

time to time deem appropriate. 

16. Any party may move the Court to alter or enlarge this order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: __January 27, 2016 

__________________ BRYAN CAVE LLP 

Daniel Rockey 

Sharon K. Brown 

 By: Sharon K. Brown 

 Sharon K. Brown 

 Attorneys for Defendant

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 

Dated: ____________________ LAW OFFICE OF GILBERT E. 

MAINES 

Gilbert E. Maines 

 By:

 Gilbert E. Maines 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

JEFFREY LANINI AND KRISTA 

LANINI 

signature on original

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 74 Filed 04/27/16 Page 8 of 11
Bryan Cave LLP 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

C022167/0322255/1118191.1\0347502.2 

EXHIBIT A 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 

I, _________________________, declare under penalty of perjury that I have 

read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by 

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on 

[_____________, 2015] in the case of Jeffrey Lanini v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, 

National Association et al., Case No. 32:13-cv-00027-KJM-JFM. I agree to comply 

with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I 

understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions 

and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not 

disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated 

Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the 

provisions of this Order. 

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this 

Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after 

termination of this action. 

Date: _____________________________ 

City and State where sworn and signed: 

_______________________________________ 

Printed name: 

 [printed name] 

Signature: 

 [signature]

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 74 Filed 04/27/16 Page 9 of 11
Bryan Cave LLP 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

BRYAN CAVE LLP 

Daniel Rockey, California Bar No. 178604 

Thomas S. Lee, California Bar. No. 275706 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 675-3400 

Facsimile: (415) 675-3434 

Email: daniel.rockey@bryancave.com 

 tom.lee@bryancave.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., for itself and as successor by merger to Chase Home 

Finance LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO BRANCH 

Jeffrey Lanini and Krista Lanini,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA 

RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, A 

CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; CHASE 

HOME FINANCE, LLC; CHASE 

FULFILLMENT SERVICES, FEDERAL 

DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, A 

FEDERAL CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER 

FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:13-CV-00027-KJM-JFM

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Complaint Filed: January 5, 2013 

Trial Date: November 7, 2016 

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 74 Filed 04/27/16 Page 10 of 11
Bryan Cave LLP 

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation for Protective Order between Plaintiffs 

Jeffrey Lanini and Krista Lanini and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., for itself and as 

successor by merger to Chase Home Finance LLC, filed on January 28, 2016 (ECF No. 71), the 

Court hereby rules as follows: 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 26, 2016 

 

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 74 Filed 04/27/16 Page 11 of 11