Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04303/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04303-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 320
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING

TIME FOR DEFENDANT MCAFEE TO FILE

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

CASE NO. CV-09-4303

LYNNE C. HERMLE (STATE BAR NO. 99779)

lchermle@orrick.com

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: +1-650-614-7400

Facsimile: +1-650-614-7401

KENNETH P. HERZINGER (STATE BAR NO. 209688)

kherzinger@orrick.com

BROOKE D. ARENA (STATE BAR NO. 238836)

barena@orrick.com

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

The Orrick Building

405 Howard Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-2669

Telephone: +1-415-773-5700

Facsimile: +1-415-773-5759

Attorneys for Defendant

McAfee, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

KENT H. ROBERTS

Plaintiff,

v.

McAFEE, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. CV-09-4303

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR

DEFENDANT MCAFEE, INC. TO FILE

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND

COSTS

Case 4:09-cv-04303-PJH Document 69 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

ENLARGING TIME FOR DEFENDANT MCAFEE TO

FILE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

CASE NO. CV-09-4303

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between plaintiff Kent Roberts

(“Roberts”) and defendant McAfee, Inc. (“McAfee”), through their undersigned counsel of

record, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 as follows:

On March 8, 2010, the Court entered an order granting in part McAfee’s motion to strike

Roberts’s complaint pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16 (“AntiSLAPP Motion”). McAfee has submitted a pleading stating that it intends to file a motion for

attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with its Anti-SLAPP Motion. Pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 54, McAfee’s deadline to file its motion for fees is March 22, 2010, 14 days

following the Court’s order granting in part the Anti-SLAPP Motion.

The parties seek to enlarge by two weeks the time in which McAfee must file its motion

for fees. This two-week extension will permit McAfee to file its motion for fees on or before

April 5, 2010. As set forth in the accompanying Declaration of Kenneth P. Herzinger in Support

of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order, Roberts requested this two-week extension in order to

have adequate time to assess McAfee’s claim of entitlement to attorneys’ fees in connection with

the Anti-SLAPP Motion and to give the parties additional time to meet and confer regarding

McAfee’s motion for fees.

Extending the foregoing deadline will have no additional impact on the schedule for the

case as no other deadlines need rescheduling at this time. Accordingly, the parties stipulate to

extend the deadline as set forth above, and respectfully request that the Court so order.

/ /

/ /

/ /

/ /

/ /

/ /

/ /

/ /

Case 4:09-cv-04303-PJH Document 69 Filed 03/23/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

ENLARGING TIME FOR DEFENDANT MCAFEE TO

FILE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

CASE NO. CV-09-4303

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: March 19, 2010 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

/s/ Kenneth P. Herzinger

LYNNE C. HERMLE

KENNETH P. HERZINGER

BROOKE D. ARENA

Attorneys for Defendant

McAfee, Inc.

Dated: March 19, 2010 GILLESPIE, ROZEN & WATSKY P.C.

/s/ Hal S. Gillespie

HAL K. GILLESPIE

JAMES D. SANFORD

TIFFANY C. ALVOID

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Kent Roberts

ORDER

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN AND PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO

ORDERED.

Dated: March __, 2010 _______________________________________

THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:09-cv-04303-PJH Document 69 Filed 03/23/10 Page 3 of 3