Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04178/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04178-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. C 07-04178 JCS 

RODGER R. COLE (CSB NO. 178865) 

rcole@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

JENNIFER L. KELLY (CSB NO. 193416) 

jkelly@fenwick.com 

RACHAEL G. SAMBERG (CSB NO. 223694) 

rsamberg@fenwick.com 

BRIAN W. CARVER (CSB NO. 244878) 

bcarver@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

Attorneys for Defendant Intuit Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INTER-MARK USA, INC., individually 

and on behalf of all persons similarly 

situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTUIT INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 07-04178 JCS 

PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to 

participate in mediation but have not yet agreed on private versus Court-appointed processes. 

Case 3:07-cv-04178-JCS Document 24 Filed 11/16/07 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1 CASE NO. C 07-04178 JCS 

Dated: November 14, 2007 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Rachael G. Samberg 

 Rachael G. Samberg 

Attorneys for Defendant INTUIT INC. 

Dated: November 14, 2007 Max Folkenflik, Esq. 

Margaret McGerity, Esq. 

FOLKENFLIK & MCGERITY 

By: /s/ Max Folkenflik 

 Max Folkenflik 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff INTER-MARK USA, 

INC. 

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 

 I, Rachael G. Samberg, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from any signatories indicated by a “conformed” signature (/S/) within this e-filed 

document. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 14th day of November, 2007 at San Francisco, 

California. 

Dated: November 14, 2007 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Rachael G. Samberg 

 Rachael G. Samberg 

Attorneys for Defendant INTUIT INC. 

Case 3:07-cv-04178-JCS Document 24 Filed 11/16/07 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS

2 CASE NO. C-07 4178 JCS 

[PROPOSED ORDER]

 Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

_______________. 

 The deadline for ADR session is _________________. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________ _________________________________ 

 Honorable Joseph C. Spero 

16319/40029/LIT/1276080.2 

Mediation. The parties shall decide by 11/30/7 on type of ADR process and advise the Court at Ninety days (90) from the date of this Order. 11/15/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

the case management conference on 11/30/7.

Case 3:07-cv-04178-JCS Document 24 Filed 11/16/07 Page 3 of 3