Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02052/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02052-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK WALKER and LINDA WALKER,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

 AMERICAN SERVICING COMPANY,

Defendant. /

No. C 07-2052 PJH 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On June 27, 2007, this Court issued an order to show cause why plaintiffs’ claims

should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as the plaintiffs’ complaint

(styled as a Motion for Extension of Time to Foreclosure [sic]) did not contain allegations

stating a federal cause of action. The court ordered plaintiffs to respond to the order to

show cause by July 30, 2007, noting that the court would dismiss the case if plaintiffs did

not respond. Plaintiffs have not responded to the order to show cause. Accordingly, the

complaint is HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 2, 2007 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:07-cv-02052-PJH Document 17 Filed 08/02/07 Page 1 of 1