Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05535/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05535-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DATEL HOLDINGS LTD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant. /

No. C-09-05535 EDL

ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

On July 13, 2010, Plaintiff filed a request to set a further case management conference on the

Court’s earliest convenient date. On July 15, 2010, Defendant filed a response to Plaintiff’s request,

arguing that a further case management conference should be held on or after the hearing on

Defendant’s Motion to Bifurcate, which Defendant intends to file on July 23, 2010 and set for

hearing at the end of August. 

As noted by Defendant, at the June 2, 2010 further case management conference, the Court

approved the suggestion by counsel that another further case management conference should be held

on the same date as the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Bifurcate. See Def.’s Response at Ex. A

at 23. Therefore, in accord with the Court’s statement on June 2, 2010, a further case management

conference shall be held in conjunction with the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Bifurcate. A

joint updated case management conference statement shall be filed no later than one week before the

further case management conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 20, 2010 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05535-EDL Document 45 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 1