Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01589/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01589-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT PAUL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1589 DFL GGH P

vs.

T. GUZMAN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 12, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed April 11, 2005, dismissing plaintiff’s claims challenging the indigent inmate

postage policy and the delay in the processing of his legal mail and granting plaintiff thirty days

to file a second amended complaint. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s

orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire

file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed April 11, 2005, is

affirmed;

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01589-DFL-GGH Document 20 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is due thirty days from the date of this

order.

DATED: 6/23/2005

 /s/ David F. Levi 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/paul1589.850

Case 2:04-cv-01589-DFL-GGH Document 20 Filed 06/24/05 Page 2 of 2