Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-122/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL No. 1917

Case No. C-07-5944-SC

ORDER DENYING PHILIPS 

DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 

RULES 7-11 and 79-5(d)

This Order Relates To:

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

HITACHI LTD., et al.,

 Defendants.

On May 9, 2013, the Philips Defendants filed an Administrative 

Motion to Seal Documents Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-

5(d). ECF No. 1667 ("Philips Mot."). The Philips Defendants filed 

their motion under Local Rule 79-5(d), which in this case requires 

them to file certain documents under seal because Plaintiff Costco 

Wholesale Corporation ("Costco") marked them confidential per this 

case's protective order. Rule 79-5(d) gave Costco seven days after 

the Philips Motion's filing to file a declaration establishing that 

the designated documents meet the requirements for sealing. Costco 

did not file the required declaration.

///

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1697 Filed 05/29/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

Accordingly, per Local Rule 79-5(d), the Court DENIES the 

Philips Motion. The Court STAYS this order for fifteen days after 

its signature date to allow Costco time to file a declaration, if 

it so chooses. If that date passes, the Philips Defendants are to 

file the documents as part of the public record per Local Rule 79-

5(d).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 29, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1697 Filed 05/29/13 Page 2 of 2