Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-01381/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-01381-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Dean Haller, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Wells Fargo Bank NA; World Savings

Bank, FSB; MTC Financial Inc., dba

Trustee Corps, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CV 11-1381-PHX-FJM

ORDER

The court has before it plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (doc. 20). This case

arises out of a notice of trustee sale that was executed by defendant Wells Fargo for a

property owned by plaintiff. On September 29, 2011 we granted defendants' motions to

dismiss all claims (doc. 15). Plaintiff moves the court to reconsider our ruling. 

Under LR Civ 7.2(g), a court should deny a motion for reconsideration "absent a

showing of manifest error or a showing of new facts or legal authority that could not have

been brought to its attention earlier with reasonable diligence." Plaintiff argues that we

dismissed the case in part because we stated that plaintiff failed to respond to defendant

Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is mistaken. We noted in our order that plaintiff's

response to the motion to dismiss (doc. 12) was among the items before the court. Order at

1. In addition to its motion to dismiss, Wells Fargo filed a separate request for judicial notice

(doc. 10). As we stated in our order, plaintiff did not file an opposition or other response to

Case 2:11-cv-01381-FJM Document 23 Filed 11/01/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Wells Fargo's request for judicial notice. Id. at 1. In addition, we noted that plaintiff did not

respond to MTC Financial's motion to renew its state court motion to dismiss (doc. 8). Id.

at 3. We indicated that the request for judicial notice and MTC Financial's motion to dismiss,

not Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss, were unopposed. 

We carefully considered plaintiff's arguments before ruling on Wells Fargo's motion

to dismiss. Plaintiff has not brought forth new facts or legal authority, and has made no

showing that our order committed manifest error. Accordingly, we deny plaintiff's motion.

IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (doc. 20).

DATED this 1st day of November, 2011.

Case 2:11-cv-01381-FJM Document 23 Filed 11/01/11 Page 2 of 2