Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01365/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01365-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY STEVEN WRIGHT, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al, )

)

)

Respondents. )

 )

CV- F- 06- 1365- LJO- DLB- HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

ORDER DISMISSING WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS

While reviewing and researching the instant Petition, it became clear to this Court that a

document attached to the Petition and relied upon by the petitioner had questionable authenticity. (Letter

dated June 9, 2006, purportedly from the Clerk of Court of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals). It is

not the Court's function to pursue the matter, but it is the duty of the Court to report such suspicious

activity to the proper governmental agency for their independent analysis. That has been done. 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 2254. 

On January 16, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation that the

Case 1:06-cv-01365-LJO -DLB Document 32 Filed 03/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim and that all pending

motions should be DENIED as MOOT. This Report and Recommendation was served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections to the Report and Recommendation were to be filed within fifteen

(15) days of the date of service of the order. On February 7, 2007, Petitioner filed objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Report and

Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation issued January 16, 2007 is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim;

3. All pending motions should be DENIED as MOOT (Docs. 14, 15, 19, 21, 22, 23); and

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Respondent. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 2, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01365-LJO -DLB Document 32 Filed 03/05/07 Page 2 of 2