Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00202/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00202-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

El Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

E] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform ofADR, must participate in an

ADR phone conference and may notfile thisform. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeedforADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 andADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:El Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

El the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrom the date ofthe order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

The Court ordered the parties to complete ADR before August 27,

other requested deadline 2010 (date of continued Case Management Conference).

Dated:July 12, 2010

Attorney for aintiff

Dated:_____

Attorney for tcendants

Impero Technologies, Inc., Nicholas Steigelman,

Joseph Zhang, Mitchell Heinlein, and Michelle

Dover

Dated:

Attorney for DefendantsRonald Lesniak and David Lesniak

Dated: 

American LegalNet, Inc

www.USCourlForms.com
(

)

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

Q Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge isappreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform ofADR, must participate in an

ADR phone conference and may notfile thisform. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeedforADR Phone ‘onference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

Q Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

D the presumptive deadline (The deadline ix 90 daysfrom the date ofthe order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

The Court ordered the parties to complete ADR before August 27,

other requested deadline 2010 (daceof continued Case Management Conference).

Dated:July 12,2010 j.2

Attorney for&[aintiff

TMX Funding, Inc.

Dated: 

Attorney for Defendants

Impero Techno gies, Inc., Nicholas Steigelman,

Josep ang, itchell Heinlein, and Michelle

Dated: 1

DoAtto ey for efendants

Ro Id Lesniak and David Lesniak

Dated: 

Am.*c.n Leg&N.I, Inc.www.USCcurtFonne.com
Deadline for ADR session

El 90 days from the date of this order.

other August 26, 2010

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Asn.,icn 1.gINat, Inc.

www.USCoudFomlLcom

7/23/10

------------------

DISTRICT