Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02220/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02220-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE CONAGRA FOODS, INC.’S MOT. 

TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C 09-2220 CRB 

Robert B. Hawk (SBN 118054) 

Ryan D. Marsh (SBN 237259) 

HOGAN & HARTSON LLP 

525 University Avenue, 4th Floor 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 463-4000 

Facsimile: (650) 463-4199 

rbhawk@hhlaw.com; rdmarsh@hhlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CONAGRA FOODS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JULIE MEAUNRIT, Individually and on Behalf of 

All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CONAGRA FOODS, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 09-02220 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFING DIRECTED AT 

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

Case 3:09-cv-02220-CRB Document 47 Filed 01/25/10 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE CONAGRA FOODS, INC.’S MOT. 

TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C 09-2220 CRB 

 

WHEREAS pursuant to the Court’s December 11, 2009 minute order and consistent with 

the Court’s directions to the parties during the December 11, 2009 hearing on Defendant 

ConAgra Foods, Inc.’s (“ConAgra’s”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, 

the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend her complaint and file a Second Amended Complaint 

within (20) days of that hearing, and indicated that the parties could file supplemental briefs 

addressing issues relating to the amended allegations in such amended complaint, and that 

counsel should meet and confer over a briefing schedule; 

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint on December 31, 2009; 

WHEREAS Defendant intends to submit additional briefing consistent with the Court’s 

directions and minute order referenced above, and the parties have agreed to a stipulated briefing 

schedule; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant 

ConAgra, through their respective counsel, that 

(1) ConAgra’s supplemental brief shall be filed on January 29, 2010, 

(2) Plaintiff’s supplemental brief in response shall be filed on February 18, 2010, 

(3) Because the parties have not reached agreement regarding the filing of a supplemental 

reply brief, ConAgra reserves its rights to seek leave from the Court to file a supplemental reply 

brief, which if such brief is filed, shall be filed no later than February 25, 2010, and Plaintiff 

reserves her rights to oppose such an application; and 

(4) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss with respect to the First Amended Complaint and 

Second Amended Complaint shall be deemed submitted upon the filing of the supplemental 

briefing referenced above, and the Court will notify the parties if it wishes further oral argument. 

Case 3:09-cv-02220-CRB Document 47 Filed 01/25/10 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE CONAGRA FOODS, INC.’S MOT. 

TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C 09-2220 CRB 

 2

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 19, 2010 HOGAN & HARTSON LLP 

 By: /s/ Robert B. Hawk 

 Robert B. Hawk 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

CONAGRA FOODS, INC. 

 

Dated: January 19, 2010 THE CONSUMER LAW GROUP 

 By: /s/ Alan M. Mansfield 

 Alan M. Mansfield 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JULIE MEAUNRIT 

// 

// 

// 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: January ___, 2010 ________________________________________ 

 U.S District Judge, Charles R. Breyer 

22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-02220-CRB Document 47 Filed 01/25/10 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE CONAGRA FOODS, INC.’S MOT. 

TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C 09-2220 CRB 

 3

I, Robert B. Hawk, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Joint Stipulation Extending Time For Defendant ConAgra Foods, Inc. to Respond to Complaint. 

I hereby attest that plaintiff’s counsel, through Alan M. Mansfield, Esq., has concurred in this 

filing. 

DATED: January 19, 2010 HOGAN & HARTSON LLP 

By /s/ Robert B. Hawk 

 Robert B. Hawk 

Case 3:09-cv-02220-CRB Document 47 Filed 01/25/10 Page 4 of 4