Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01937/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01937-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL LOUTZENHISER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1937 LKK PAN P

vs.

ALVARO C. TRAQUINA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner prosecuting a civil rights action. The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On August 22, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Defendant

Franklin and plaintiff have filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Defendant

Franklin filed a reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

Case 2:04-cv-01937-LKK -PAN Document 53 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 22, 2005 are adopted in full;

2. Defendant Franklin’s December 20, 2004, motion to dismiss is denied;

3. Plaintiff’s February 1, 2005, motion for summary judgment is denied;

4. The May 23, 2005, cross-motion for summary judgment of defendants

Traquina, Webster and Cervantes is denied, except as to plaintiff’s due process claims which are

dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and

5. Defendant Franklin’s May 25, 2005, cross-motion for summary judgment is

denied.

DATED: September 16, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01937-LKK -PAN Document 53 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 2