Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02389/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02389-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:6901 Resource &amp; Recovery Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GREBEN & ASSOCIATES

1332 ANACAPA STREET, SUITE 110

SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101

TELEPHONE: (805) 963-9090

FACSIMILE: (805) 963-9098

Jan A. Greben, State Bar No. 103464

jan@grebenlaw.com

Jenna L. Motola, State Bar No. 246738

jenna@grebenlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant RICHARD C. PETERS 

and RAMONA W. PETERS, individually and as Trustee

of the PETERS FAMILY TRUST.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC

SUBSTANCES CONTROL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PAYLESS CLEANERS, COLLEGE

CLEANERS, HEIDINGER CLEANERS,

NORGE VILLAGE CLEANERS, CAVA,

INC., a California corporation, LOBDELL

CLEANERS, CITY OF CHICO, NORVILLE

R. WEISS, JANET L. WEISS, PAUL

HEIDINGER, INEZ N. HEIDINGER, 5TH

AND IVY, a General Partnership, RICHARD

C. PETERS and RAMONA W. PETERS,

individually and as trustees of the Peters

Family Trust, BETTY M. ROLLAG,

RANDALL ROLLAG, and TAMI ROLLAG,

Defendants

Case No. CIVS-02-2389 LKK DAD

ASSIGNED TO

HON. LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

COURTROOM 4

COMPLAINT FILED: 10/31/02

TRIAL DATE: 09/23/08

ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST

RICHARD AND RAMONA PETERS,

Individually and as co-trustees of the Peters

Family Trust, 

Third Party Plaintiffs

vs. 

NORGE DIVISION OF BORG-WARNER

CORPORATION, et al.

Third Party Defendants.

Case 2:02-cv-02389-LKK -DAD Document 400 Filed 03/07/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

On March 5, 2008, Richard and Ramona Peters, individually and as co-trustees of the

Peters Family Trust (“the Peters”); Plaintiff Department of Toxic Substances Control

(“Plaintiff”); the City of Chico (“City”) and Maytag Corporation (“Maytag”), submitted a joint

request to extend the law and motion cutoff date in this case by one week, from April 15, 2008 to

April 22, 2008 or to allow the hearing on Maytag’s motion for summary judgment to be

scheduled after the law and motion cutoff on April 21, 2008. In the alternative, the parties

requested that the Court vacate the current case deadlines set on September 25, 2007 and set a

Case Management Conference for April 21, 2008. The Court has read the papers submitted,

reviewed the authorities cited, and considered the argument of counsel. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The motion is GRANTED;

2. [The Law and Motion cutoff in this case is extended to April 22, 2008.]/[The hearing on 

 Maytag’s motion for summary judgment may be scheduled for April 21, 2008 at 10 am.]

DATED: March 6, 2008.

Case 2:02-cv-02389-LKK -DAD Document 400 Filed 03/07/08 Page 2 of 2