Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00827/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00827-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rule 41 Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Claims Against DGS

1

EDMUND G. BROWN JR.

Attorney General of the State of California

JACOB A. APPELSMITH

Senior Assistant Attorney General

ALICIA FOWLER

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

WILLIAM T. DARDEN, State Bar No. 155079

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 323-3830

Fax: (916) 324-5567

Attorneys for Defendant DEPARTMENT OF

GENERAL SERVICES

LAWRENCE J. KING, State Bar #120805

6 “C” Street 

Petaluma, CA 949

(707) 769-9791

(707) 769-9253

Attorney for Plaintiff Sharon Paterson

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHARON PATERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL

SERVICES, RAYMOND ASBELL and

INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-0827-MCE-JFM

RULE 41 STIPULATION OF

DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S

CLAIMS AGAINST DEPARTMENT

OF GENERAL SERVICES

Trial Date: March 14, 2007

Courtroom: 3 

Honorable . 

Morrison England

Case 2:05-cv-00827-MCE -JFM Document 61 Filed 02/16/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rule 41 Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Claims Against DGS

2

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD AND THEIR COUNSEL

OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, Plaintiff Sharon Paterson and Defendant the Department of General Services (“DGS”

or the “Department”) (the “Parties”) hereby stipulate and agree that DGS may be dismissed as a

Defendant in this case under the following conditions:

1. Each side is to bear its own fees and costs;

2. Upon delivery of the settlement proceeds to Plaintiff in accordance with the

Settlement Agreement between Plaintiff and DGS, and the filing by counsel for the Department

of General Services with this Court of a “Notice of Payment of Settlement Proceeds,” the

dismissal of DGS shall be WITH PREJUDICE;

3. Until the settlement proceeds are delivered to Plaintiff, the action is

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff’s right to reinstate the action in the event

DGS notifies her that the settlement cannot be consummated by payment to Plaintiff;

4. Until the Department is deemed dismissed with prejudice in accordance

with the terms of this stipulation, the Parties agree that the Court may retain jurisdiction over this

matter with respect to the Parties. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: 2/13/07

 /s/ William T. Darden 

WILLIAM T. DARDEN

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendant DGS 

FOR

EDMUND G. BROWN JR.

Attorney General of the State of California

///

///

///

///

Case 2:05-cv-00827-MCE -JFM Document 61 Filed 02/16/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rule 41 Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Claims Against DGS

3

Dated: 2/8/07 /s/ Lawrence King 

LAWRENCE KING

Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: February 15, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00827-MCE -JFM Document 61 Filed 02/16/07 Page 3 of 3