Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01004/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01004-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Louis T. Cervantes, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Richard Pratt, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV04-1004-PHX-SRB

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

recommending that Defendant Jabczenski’s motion that the Court order Plaintiff to cease

serving him with pleadings and documents be granted. On January 28, 2008, Plaintiff filed

objections to the Report and Recommendation and a request for oral argument. The

objections will be overruled. The request for oral argument is denied. 

 Defendant Jabczenski was first dismissed from this case in 2004. Plaintiff filed an

amended complaint renaming him in January 2005. Later, the Court granted summary

judgment in favor of Defendant Jabczenski dismissing Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims

of improper medical care against him. This ruling was affirmed on appeal. 

After remand from the Court of Appeals, this Court held a status conference and

confirmed to the Plaintiff that the only matters pending before the Court were a retaliation

claim against Defendants Schriro, Baird, Macabuhay, Stapler, Sloan, Pratt and Jones and an

excessive force claim against Defendant Karkhoff. Although no longer a party, Plaintiff has

Case 2:04-cv-01004-SRB-MEA Document 343 Filed 02/07/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

continued to deluge Defendant Jabczenski with paper and to assert that he is still a Defendant

in this case liable for retaliation. He is not. 

In his objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation Plaintiff states

that the Magistrate is biased and highly prejudiced against him because the Report and

Recommendation notes that Plaintiff is a potentially vexatious litigant who has filed

excessive and frivolous motions. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that the

Plaintiff is a potentially vexatious litigant and that he has filed excessive and clearly frivolous

motions as well as frivolous objections to other rulings of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff’s

objections are without merit and will be overruled.

IT IS ORDERED overruling Plaintiff’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court. (Doc. 313).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Felix Jabczenski, M.D.’s Motion Requesting

the Court to Order Plaintiff to Cease Serving Felix Jabczenski, M.D., With Discovery and

Other Documents in This Matter. (Doc. 300).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve no further pleadings, papers or

documents on Dr. Jabczenski or his counsel in this matter. If Plaintiff does not cease such

service as directed by this order Plaintiff shall be subject to sanctions up to and including the

dismissal of Plaintiff’s case.

DATED this 6th day of February, 2008.

Case 2:04-cv-01004-SRB-MEA Document 343 Filed 02/07/08 Page 2 of 2