Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01282/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01282-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Suzanne D. McGuire #203888

Sherrie M. Flynn #240215

STIPULATION AND ORDER ON RESPONSES TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

 BAKER, MANOCK & JENSEN

 A PROFES SIONA L CO RP ORA TION

 F IG GARDE N F INAN C IAL C ENT E R

 5 2 6 0 N O R T H PA L M AV E N U E , F O U R T H F L OOR

 FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93704-2209

 T E L EPHONE (559) 432-5400

 T E L E C OPI E R (559) 432-5620

Attorneys for

Defendant MUHAMMAD ANWAR, M.D.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

GENEA SCOTT, REGINA BOYCE, AND

JULIE HOLMES,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RODERICK HICKMAN; FRENCHIE SELLF;

JEANNE WOODFORD; RICHARD

RIMMER; ROSANNE CAMPBELL; PETER

SZEKRENYI; DEBRA JACQUEZ;

GWENDOLYN MITCHELL; SAMPATH

SURYADEVARA, M.D.; JUAN JOSE TUR,

M.D.; MUHAMMAD ANWAR, M.D.;

SUSAN HOGELUND, R.N.; and MADERA

COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a California

Corporation,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:05-CV-01282-OWW-NEW

(WMW)

STIPULATION AND ORDER ON

RESPONSES TO THIRD AMENDED

COMPLAINT

As authorized by Rule 6-144 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California, the parties, by and through their respective attorneys of

record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. In order that the parties may have the benefit of the Court’s rulings on

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File [Proposed] Third Amended Complaint and Motion for

Reconsideration, all parties agree that Responses to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint will be

filed no later than April 19, 2007. 

2. If the Court has not issued a written ruling on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to

Case 1:05-cv-01282-OWW -GSA Document 64 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER ON RESPONSES TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

File [Proposed] Third Amended Complaint and Motion for Reconsideration at least five days prior

to April 19, 2007, the parties may further stipulate to a new date for responses to be filed. 

All parties who have appeared in this action have signed below, indicating their

agreement to this stipulation.

Dated: February 22, 2007

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

By: /s/ Elizabeth P. Miller

Jason A. Yurasek

Daniel A. Feldstein

Elizabeth P. Miller

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Genea Scott, Regina Boyce and Julie Holmes

Dated: February 22, 2007

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

By: /s/ William A. Krabbenhoft

Thomas McCrackin 

William A. Krabbenhoft

Attorneys for Defendants

Roderick Hickman; Frenchie Sellf; Jeanne

Woodford; Richard Rimmer; Rosanne

Campbell; Peter Szekrenyi; Debra Jacquez;

Gwendolyn Mitchell; Sampath Suryadevara,

M.D.; Juan Jose Tur, M.D.; Shelly Krus, M.D.

Dated: February 22, 2007

BAKER, MANOCK & JENSEN

By: /s/ Sherrie M. Flynn

Suzanne D. McGuire

Sherrie M. Flynn

Attorneys for Defendant

Muhammad Anwar, M.D.

Dated: February 21, 2007

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,

WAYTE & CARRUTH

By: /s/ Daniel L. Wainwright

Mario L. Beltramo, Jr.

Daniel L. Wainwright

Attorneys for Defendants

Susan Hogelund, R.N.;

Madera Community Hospital

Case 1:05-cv-01282-OWW -GSA Document 64 Filed 02/26/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER ON RESPONSES TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 25, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01282-OWW -GSA Document 64 Filed 02/26/07 Page 3 of 3