Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923-56/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

DECHERT LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORD. GRANTING ADMIN. REQ. TO FILE UNDER SEAL PER CIV. L.R. 7-11 & 79-5 RE: OPPOS. TO MAGMA’S 

MSJ RE: 2ND THROUGH 6TH CAUSES OF ACTION IN 2ND AMENDED COMPL.; CASE NO: C 04-03923 MMC (JCS) 12280305.2 

Chris Scott Graham (State Bar No. 114498) 

chris.scott.graham@dechert.com 

Michael N. Edelman (State Bar No. 180948) 

michael.edelman@dechert.com 

DECHERT LLP 

1117 California Avenue

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: 650.813.4800 

Facsimile: 650.813.4848 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

SYNOPSYS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

v.

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, a 

Delaware corporation, 

Defendant and Counter-Claimant. 

Case No. C-04-03923 MMC (JCS) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

SYNOPSYS, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS 

UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL 

LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5 

RELATING TO OPPOSITION TO 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

AS TO THE SECOND THROUGH 

SIXTH CAUSES OF ACTION IN THE 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 905 Filed 12/29/05 Page 1 of 2
DECHERT LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORD. GRANTING ADMIN. REQ. TO FILE UNDER SEAL PER CIV. L.R. 7-11 & 79-5 RE: OPPOS. TO MAGMA’S 1

MSJ RE: 2ND THROUGH 6TH CAUSES OF ACTION IN 2ND AMENDED COMPL.; CASE NO: C 04-03923 MMC (JCS) 12280305.2 

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) filed an Administrative 

Motion, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, requesting to file under seal certain 

documents submitted in connection with Synopsys’ Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In 

Support Of Opposition To Magma Design Automation’s Motion For Summary Judgment As To 

The Second Through Sixth Causes Of Action In Synopsys, Inc.’s Second Amended Complaint. 

Having considered Synopsys’ Administrative Motion, and for good cause appearing 

therefore, the Court GRANTS Synopsys’ request and orders that the following documents be 

filed under seal: 

1. the entirety of Exhibit A to Synopsys’ Opposition To Magma Design Automation’s 

Motion For Summary Judgment As To The Second Through Sixth Causes Of Action In 

Synopsys, Inc.’s Second Amended Complaint; 

2. the entirety of the Declaration of Michael N. Edelman in Support of Synopsys, 

Inc.’s Opposition to Magma Design Automation, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment As To 

The Second Through Sixth Causes Of Action In The Second Amended Complaint (the “Edelman 

Declaration”);

3. the entirety of Exhibits 7, 28, 29, 30 36, 38, 39, 40,44, 59, 60, 61, 62, 65, 68, 69, 70, 

71, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 79, 81, 84, 86, 87, 89, and 90 to the Edelman Declaration. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________________ ______________________________________ 

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

December 29, 2005

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 905 Filed 12/29/05 Page 2 of 2