Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01799/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01799-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW CEJAS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1799 LKK GGH P

vs.

LOU BLANAS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed November 3, 2006, the court granted plaintiff a thirty day extension

of time to file a third amended complaint. In the September 20, 2006 order, the court informed

plaintiff of the deficiencies in his second amended complaint. The thirty day period has now

expired, and plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

court’s order.

For the reasons given in the September 20, 2006, order, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

Case 2:05-cv-01799-LKK -GGH Document 26 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

DATED: 1/19/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

ceja1799.fta

Case 2:05-cv-01799-LKK -GGH Document 26 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 2