Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04791/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04791-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

Ex Parte Application to Continue Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order 

Case No. 5:07-CV-04791-JF 

#35535 v1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Matthew Franklin Jaksa (CA State Bar No. 248072) 

HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 

Telephone: (415) 268-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 

Email: matt.jaksa@hro.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 

INTERSCOPE RECORDS; SONY BMG 

MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT; UMG 

RECORDINGS, INC.; ELEKTRA 

ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC.; 

WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC.; 

PRIORITY RECORDS LLC; and 

MOTOWN RECORD COMPANY, L.P. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

INTERSCOPE RECORDS, a California general 

partnership; SONY BMG MUSIC 

ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general 

partnership; UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a 

Delaware corporation; ELEKTRA 

ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC., a Delaware 

corporation; WARNER BROS. RECORDS 

INC., a Delaware corporation; PRIORITY 

RECORDS LLC, a California limited liability 

company; and MOTOWN RECORD 

COMPANY, L.P., a California limited 

partnership, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

JOE PETELLE, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 5:07-CV-04791-JF 

Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

*efiled 2/27/08

--------------------

Case 5:07-cv-04791-JF Document 15 Filed 02/27/08 Page 1 of 3
 1 

Ex Parte Application to Continue Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order 

Case No. 5:07-CV-04791-JF 

#35535 v1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Plaintiffs hereby request that the Court continue the case management conference currently 

set for March 14, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. to June 13, 2008. The Court previously continued the case 

management conference from January 11, 2008 to the presently scheduled date. Plaintiffs filed their 

complaint in this matter on September 18, 2007. Defendant was served with the summons and 

complaint on October 22, 2007, by substitute service. Defendant failed to answer or otherwise 

respond to the complaint. The clerk of this Court entered default against Defendant on December 

18, 2007. Accordingly, along with this application, Plaintiffs have filed their motion for default 

judgment by the Court. Therefore, no case management conference is necessary on the scheduled 

date. Plaintiffs therefore respectfully request that the Court continue the case management 

conference to June 13, 2008. 

Dated: February 22, 2008 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 

 By: _________/s/ Matthew Franklin Jaksa____

Matthew Franklin Jaksa 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

ORDER

 Good cause having been shown: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Case Management conference currently scheduled for March 14, 

2008 at 10:30 a.m. be continued to June 13, 2008. 

Dated: __________________ By: _______________________________ 

Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

United States District Judge

2/27/08

Case 5:07-cv-04791-JF Document 15 Filed 02/27/08 Page 2 of 3
 1 

Ex Parte Application to Continue Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order 

Case No. 5:07-CV-04791-JF 

#35535 v1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

I am employed in the office of Holme Roberts & Owen in San Francisco, California. I am 

over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 560 

Mission Street, 25th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. 

On February 22, 2008, I served the foregoing documents described as: 

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

on the interested party in this action by placing a true and correct copy thereof enclosed in a sealed 

envelope addressed as follows: 

Joe Petelle 

131 Senter Road 

San Jose, CA 95111 

 BY MAIL: I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and 

processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal 

service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Francisco, California in the 

ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed 

invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for 

mailing in affidavit. 

 (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this 

court at whose direction the service was made. 

Executed on February 22, 2008 at San Francisco, California. 

Case 5:07-cv-04791-JF Document 15 Filed 02/27/08 Page 3 of 3