Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01548/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01548-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael L. Shoen, a resident of Arizona, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Richard Symons, a resident of Great

Britain, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV09-1548 PHX DGC

ORDER

On today’s date, Defendants moved for dismissal, arguing that the Court should

decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claim. Doc. 67.

The contract at issue in this case was the basis for a permanent injunction issued by this

Court in a related case, and Defendants have not shown a non-existent federal interest in

adjudicating the contract claim. Moreover, Plaintiff’s complaint alleges diversity as an

alternative basis for jurisdiction.

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (Doc. 67) is denied.

DATED this 22nd day of August, 2011.

Case 2:09-cv-01548-DGC Document 68 Filed 08/22/11 Page 1 of 1