Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02774/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02774-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATHAN VARGAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS BANSURIE, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2: 18-cv-2774 TLN KJN P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed November 14, 2019, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended 

complaint. (ECF No. 38.) On November 22, 2019, the November 14, 2019 order was re-served 

at plaintiff’s new address. Thirty days passed from November 22, 2019, and plaintiff did not file 

an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 

////

Case 2:18-cv-02774-TLN-KJN Document 40 Filed 01/03/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: January 3, 2020

Varg2774.fta

Case 2:18-cv-02774-TLN-KJN Document 40 Filed 01/03/20 Page 2 of 2