Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05884/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05884-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAFAEL ANTONIO ESPINA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JESUS MAGALLANES, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05884-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 49)

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS

HINZ, LAYPORT, ANDREWS, AND

HARRISON PURSUANT TO FEDERAL

RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(M)

Plaintiff Rafael Antonio Espina is proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v.

Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 1, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. To date,

the parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:04-cv-05884-LJO -LJO Document 52 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of

this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the

record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 1, 2006,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Defendants Hinz, Layport, Andrews, and Harrison are

DISMISSED from this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 16, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05884-LJO -LJO Document 52 Filed 09/19/06 Page 2 of 2