Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01655/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01655-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

RACHELE GRINZI, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CURTIS BARNES, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 04-1655 PVT

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH

WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PROPERLY

NOTICED MOTION

On May 20, 2005, Defendants filed a “Notice of Intent to Quash Subpoena.”1 To the

extent Defendants intended this to be a motion to quash, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice to Defendants

bringing a properly noticed motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.

Dated: 6/3/05

 /s/ Patricia V. Trumbull 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:04-cv-01655-PVT Document 85 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 1