Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04689/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04689-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOURDES A. ACASIO,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAN MATEO COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-04689-JSC 

ORDER FOLLOWING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Following the Case Management Conference held on January 28, 2016, it is ORDERED 

that: 

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE

The following deadlines shall govern:

Discovery Cut-Off: May 31, 2016

Summary Judgment Motion Filing Deadline: July 14, 2016

Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment: August 18, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT WARNING TO PLAINTIFF

Plaintiff is advised that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. Rule 56 tells you what you must 

do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be 

granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact—that is, if there is no real dispute about 

any fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is 

entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing 

makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn 

Case 3:14-cv-04689-JSC Document 51 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your Complaint says. Instead, you must set out 

specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, 

as provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in Defendants’ declarations and 

documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit 

your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. 

If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. Rand v. 

Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) (App. A).

If Plaintiff files a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff must (1) provide admissible

evidence, which includes things like sworn statements, medical records, and physical objects and

(2) show that the defendant does not have any admissible evidence that, if true, would prove any 

of the defendant’s defenses to the plaintiff’s claims. To support a motion for summary judgment, 

Plaintiff must file copies of the evidence you want the Court to consider and refer to the evidence 

throughout your papers. 

The Court reminds Plaintiff that she may seek assistance from the Northern District’s Pro 

Se Help Desk, United States Courthouse, San Francisco, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, 

Room 2796, San Francisco, CA 94102 or the Help Desk at the Oakland Federal Courthouse, 1301 

Clay Street, 4th Floor, Room 470S, Oakland, CA 94612. Appointments can be made in person or 

by calling 415-782-8982.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2016

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-04689-JSC Document 51 Filed 01/29/16 Page 2 of 2