Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02523/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02523-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

- 1 - 

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 

GUZE19446\stip-extend-3.doc C 07-2523 RS

Dylan Greiner, et al. v. City of Santa Cruz, et al.

Third Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rebecca Connolly, Esq., SBN 145482 

GRUNSKY, EBEY, FARRAR & HOWELL 

A Professional Corporation 

240 Westgate Drive 

Watsonville, CA 95076 

Phone: (831)722-2444; Fax: (831)722-6153 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ED GUZMAN, individually and dba CLUB ED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

DYLAN GREINER, individually and dba 

SANTA CRUZ SURF SCHOOL; ALIJAH K. 

CROWELL; DAVID M. AVARY; 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ; OFFICER JOHN 

ALEXIOU; DANETTEE SHOEMAKER; 

CAROL SCURICH; JOHN BARISONE; ED 

GUZMAN, individually and dba CLUB ED; 

and DOES ONE THROUGH TEN, 

 Defendants 

 

 On September 18, 2007, this Court granted the parties’ second stipulation to extend the time to 

respond to the complaint. Since that time, the parties have engaged in additional meet and confer 

efforts. Based upon those efforts, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate that plaintiffs’ counsel shall 

file an amended complaint on or before October 5, 2007 and all served defendants shall have until

October 24, 2007 to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint. The parties are not 

seeking to have the Case Management Conference date modified. 

CASE NO.C No. C 06 6417 VRW 07-2523 RS

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; 

[proposed] ORDER

The Honorable Richard Seeborg 

*E-FILED 10/3/07*

Case 5:07-cv-02523-RS Document 12 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 3
- 2 - 

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 

GUZE19446\stip-extend-3.doc C 07-2523 RS

Dylan Greiner, et al. v. City of Santa Cruz, et al.

Third Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

DATED: 10/2/07 

 

By /s/ 

 Kate Wells, Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DATED: 10/2/07 

 

By /s/ 

 Barbara H. Choi, Attorneys for Defendants City 

of Santa Cruz, Officer John Alexiou; Danettee 

Shoemaker; Carol Scurich; John Barisone 

DATED: 10/2/07 GRUNSKY, EBEY, FARRAR & HOWELL 

 

By /s/ 

 Rebecca Connolly, Attorneys for Defendant Ed 

Guzman 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs shall file an 

amended complaint on or before October 5 and the defendants shall have until October 24, 2007 to 

file their responsive pleading. 

DATED: ____________________ _______________________________________ 

 Richard Seeborg 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

October 3, 2007

Case 5:07-cv-02523-RS Document 12 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 3
- 3 - 

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 

GUZE19446\stip-extend-3.doc C 07-2523 RS

Dylan Greiner, et al. v. City of Santa Cruz, et al.

Third Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 

I, Rebecca Connolly, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained 

from each of the other signatories. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 2nd day 

of October, 2007, at Watsonville, California. 

By: /s/ Rebecca Connolly

Case 5:07-cv-02523-RS Document 12 Filed 10/03/07 Page 3 of 3