Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02578/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02578-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement

---

- 1 -

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION

14176520v.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PALMER, LOMBARDI & DONOHUE LLP

515 South Flower Street, Suite 2100

Los Angeles, California 90071

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY f/k/a CHARTIS SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY f/k/a 

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL 

SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE CO.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PHOENICIAN LLC, PHOENICIAN 

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, and 

EVEREST INDEMNITY INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:13-CV-02578-WBS-DAD

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART AIG SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY’S EX PARTE 

APPLICATION FOR ORDER DEEMING 

THE DECLARATION OF RODRICK REED 

AND EXHIBITS [1-69] IN SUPPORT OF 

OPPOSITION TO EVEREST INDEMNITY 

INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO 

DISMISS FILED UNDER SEAL

The Court, having read and considered plaintiff AIG Specialty Insurance Company’s 

(“AIG Specialty”) Ex Parte Application for an Order deeming the Declaration of Rodrick Reed 

and Exhibits 1–69, (thereto in support of AIG Specialty’s Opposition to Everest Indemnity 

Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss) filed under seal, as well as the Declaration of Eric B. 

Hermanson and Declaration of Michael Houshmand in support thereof, and for good cause 

appearing, 

Case 2:13-cv-02578-WBS-CKD Document 33 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION

14176520v.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PALMER, LOMBARDI & DONOHUE LLP

515 South Flower Street, Suite 2100

Los Angeles, California 90071

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, 

1. That AIG Specialty’s Ex Parte Application is GRANTED IN PART as to Exhibits 

1–5, 8–33, 35, 37–50, and 63–66 and DENIED IN PART as to the remaining Exhibits and 

Rodrick Reed’s affidavit. The remaining documents appear to make no reference to information

that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise sensitive. 

2. That Exhibits 1–5, 8–33, 35, 37–50, and 63–66, submitted on August 22, 2014, are 

deemed filed under seal. 

Dated: September 5, 2014

Case 2:13-cv-02578-WBS-CKD Document 33 Filed 09/05/14 Page 2 of 2