Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07715/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07715-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

ORDER – No. 18-cv-07715-LB

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

San Francisco Division 

MURAD REED, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CLEAR RECON CORP., et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 18-cv-07715-LB 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE 

On June 24, 2019, after the plaintiff failed to appear at the hearing on the motion to dismiss on 

March 7, 2019 and the initial case-management conference on June 20, 2019, the court issued an 

order to show cause why the court should not dismiss the case for the plaintiff’s failure to 

prosecute it, ordered the plaintiff to file a written status report by July 11, 2019, and directed the 

plaintiff to appear in person at a show-cause hearing on July 18, 2019 at 11:00 a.m.1

 (This order 

incorporates the earlier order by reference. It is attached to this order.) The plaintiff did not file a 

written report or appear at the July 18 hearing. As the earlier order shows, the court warned the 

plaintiff about the consequences of not appearing, including dismissal of his case.2 Defense 

 

1

 Order – ECF No. 51. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File (“ECF”); pinpoint 

citations are to the ECF-generated page numbers at the top of documents. 

2 Id. at 2–4 (setting forth legal standards and consequences). 

Case 3:18-cv-07715-LB Document 55 Filed 07/18/19 Page 1 of 2
ORDER – No. 18-cv-07715-LB 2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

counsel also said at the June 20 hearing that the plaintiff told him that he was no longer interested 

in pursuing the case because the loan had been transferred.3 Under the circumstances, the court 

dismiss the case with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 18, 2019 

______________________________________ 

LAUREL BEELER 

United States Magistrate Judge 

 

3 Id. at 3. 

Case 3:18-cv-07715-LB Document 55 Filed 07/18/19 Page 2 of 2