Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02674/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02674-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2:13-cv-02674-MCE-CKD 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO MOVE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

DATE 

Nandini K. Iyer (State Bar No. 271289)

niyer@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY 

Silicon Valley Office 

1755 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Telephone: +1.650.739.3939 

Facsimile: +1.650.739.3900 

Attorneys for Defendant 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

Jesse James Thomas III and Tiffany F. 

Thomas, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., an Ohio 

corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:13-cv-02674-MCE-CKD 

REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO MOVE SETTLEMENT 

CONFERENCE DATE 

Magistrate Judge Allison Claire 

Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), requests this Court to enter 

an Order moving the settlement conference date, currently scheduled for March 17, 2016, so that 

Experian and Plaintiff can resolve discovery issues and engage in settlement discussions. As 

grounds, Experian states as follows: 

1. Plaintiffs’ former attorney has withdrawn as counsel and plaintiffs now appear pro 

se;

2. Plaintiffs asked and received an extension from Defendant Experian Information 

Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) on their discovery responses; 

Case 2:13-cv-02674-MCE-CKD Document 54 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2:13-cv-02674-MCE-CKD 

- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

DEADLINE 

3. Plaintiffs have not yet responded to all of Experian’s discovery requests; 

4. Plaintiffs provided Experian with a settlement demand; 

5. Experian’s counsel has attempted to contact plaintiffs at their mailing address, by 

email, and by telephone to further discuss outstanding discovery and settlement, 

but has not been able to reach plaintiffs. 

6. Plaintiffs stated that they were moving and have been delayed in responding to 

Experian. 

7. Parties have a settlement conference date before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire 

on March 17, 2016. 

8. Parties need more time to prepare for the settlement conference and engage in 

settlement negotiations. 

9. Moving the settlement conference date to the next available date in August 2016 

will not impact other dates in the case calendar. 

WHEREFORE, good cause shown, Experian requests that this Court grant its request to 

vacate the current settlement conference date and move the settlement conference date. 

Date: January 29, 2016 /s/ Nandini Iyer

Nandini Iyer (SBN 271289) 

JONES DAY 

1755 Embarcadero Center 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Phone: 650.739.3939 

Fax: 650.739.3900 

niyer@jonesday.com 

Counsel for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 

ORDER 

Based upon Experian’s request and for good cause shown, the settlement conference date 

of March 27, 2016 is vacated, and is continued to August 25, 2016. 

Date: February 1, 2016 

Case 2:13-cv-02674-MCE-CKD Document 54 Filed 02/02/16 Page 2 of 2