Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-360/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF SDI DEFENDANTS 

Case Nos. 13-cv-1173-SC and 13-cv-2766-SC 

Master File No. 07-cv-5944, MDL No. 1917 

Kenneth A. Gallo (pro hac vice)

Joseph J. Simons (pro hac vice)

Craig A. Benson (pro hac vice)

PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP

2001 K Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20006-1047 

Telephone: (202) 223-7300 

Facsimile: (202) 223-7420 

Email: kgallo@paulweiss.com 

Email: jsimons@paulweiss.com 

Email: cbenson@paulweiss.com 

Stephen E. Taylor (SBN 058452) 

Jonathan A. Patchen (SBN 237346) 

TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP

One Ferry Building, Suite 355 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 788-8200 

Facsimile: (415) 788-8208 

Email: staylor@tcolaw.com 

Email: jpatchen@tcolaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corporation and

Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al.,

Case No. 13-cv-1173 SC 

and

Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. v. Koninklijke Philips 

Electronics N.V., et al., Case No. 13-cv-2776 SC. 

 Case No. 07-cv-5944-SC 

MDL NO. 1917 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL OF SDI DEFENDANTS 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3927 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 2
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF SDI DEFENDANTS 

Case Nos. 13-cv-1173-SC and 13-cv-2766-SC 

Master File No. 07-cv-5944, MDL No. 1917 

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing

therefor, orders as follows: 

1. Claims asserted by Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corporation and Sharp

Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. (collectively, “Sharp”) against 

Defendants Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.; Samsung SDI America, Inc.; Samsung SDI (Malaysia) 

Sdn Bhd.; Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. de C.V.; Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda.; Shenzhen Samsung 

SDI Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.; and Samsung SDI (Hong Kong), Ltd. 

(collectively, “SDI”) in the underlying actions are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

DATED: , 2015 _________________________________

HON. SAMUEL CONTI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

07/20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3927 Filed 07/20/15 Page 2 of 2