Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-01504/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-01504-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jack Cantrell, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Patrick Pogue, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-14-1504-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

 Petitioner filed his Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 on August 15, 2014 raising three grounds for relief: 1) that Respondents 

violated his due process rights under the 5th and 14th Amendments; 2) that Respondents 

violated his speedy trial right under the 6th Amendment; and 3) that Respondents violated 

Petitioner’s equal protections rights under the 14th Amendment. Respondents filed their 

Response to Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on December 18, 2014. 

Petitioner filed his reply on January 16, 2015. On September 11, 2015, the Magistrate 

Judge issued her Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied 

and dismissed with prejudice. 

 In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time 

to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation 

have been filed. 

Case 2:14-cv-01504-SRB Document 17 Filed 10/02/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. 

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the order of this Court. (Doc. 16) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

and dismissing it with prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because dismissal of the Amended Petition is 

justified by a plain procedural bar and because Petitioner has not made a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

 Dated this 2nd day of October, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-01504-SRB Document 17 Filed 10/02/15 Page 2 of 2