Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-547/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL No. 1917

Case No. 07-cv-5944 JST

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

This Order Relates To:

ALL INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS

Pursuant to the proceedings conducted on August 8, 2019, the Court now orders as 

follows:

1. Omitted Repealer States (“ORS”) and Non-Repealer States (“NRS”) Motions. 

Briefing on the anticipated motions to amend and intervene by the ORS and NRS plaintiffs shall 

proceed as follows:

Opening brief(s) due August 23, 2019;

Opposition brief(s) due September 20, 2019; 

Reply brief(s) due October 4, 2019; and

Hearing October 23, 2019.

The Court will set a further schedule for the NRS and ORS actions following resolution of 

these motions. 

2. Liaison Counsel. Without objection from any party, Francis Scarpulla is appointed 

liaison counsel for the ORS Plaintiffs and Tracy Kirkham is appointed liaison counsel for the NRS 

Plaintiffs. Their first responsibility shall be to circulate to all parties by August 15, 2019 a 

proposed order setting forth the functions of liaison counsel, “inform[ing] other counsel and 

parties of the scope of designated counsel’s authority and . . . responsibilities.” Manual for 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 5551 Filed 08/09/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Complex Litigation (Fourth) § 10.222 (2004). Any objections must be served on Mr. Scarpulla 

and Ms. Kirkham by August 22, 2019 and must be accompanied by a competing proposed order. 

By September 4, 2019, either Mr. Scarpulla and Ms. Kirkham will file a stipulated proposed order 

of appointment, or they will file a proposed order of appointment and any objecting party will file 

a competing proposed order. In the latter case, any party filing a proposed order may file a brief 

of no more than 3 pages arguing in favor of its proposal. 

3. Transfer of Discovery Materials. The IPP Plaintiffs shall immediately meet and 

confer with the ORS and NRS plaintiffs regarding the transfer or sharing of discovery materials. 

Meet and confer discussions shall be facilitated by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Corley, who has 

agreed to serve in that role. If these discussions do not succeed in resolving all disputes between 

the parties, the ORS and/or NRS Plaintiffs shall file a motion seeking relief by September 27, 

2019. Any opposition shall be due October 8, 2019. Any reply shall be due October 15, 2019. 

The motion and opposition shall be not longer than 12 pages in length; the reply shall be limited to 

6 pages. 

4. Motion to Vacate Settlement. The Motion to Vacate Orders and Judgment 

Certifying Settlement Class, Approving Settlement and Awarding Attorneys' Fees, ECF No. 5527, 

is administratively terminated. The moving parties may revive that motion, if necessary, by filing 

a notice of motion incorporating their memorandum of points and authorities. 

5. Amended IPP Settlement. The IPPs having indicated that they have reached a 

settlement in principal on behalf of the 22 repealer states that were not omitted from the prior 

settlement, their motion for preliminary approval of an amended settlement, or an equivalent 

motion, is due by August 30, 2019. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2019

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 5551 Filed 08/09/19 Page 2 of 2