Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-00282/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-00282-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

HIGGS FLETCHER &

MACK LLP 

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

SA N DIEG O

8960275.1 1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION 

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS, CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00282-VC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LEANA TELLEZ,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

O’REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC, 

f/k/a CSK AUTO, INC. d/b/a O’REILLY 

AUTO PARTS; and Does 1-50, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:18-CV-00282-VC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO 

DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS 

DEPT: 4 

JUDGE: Hon. Vince Chhabria 

TRIAL DATE: June 10, 2019 

Plaintiff LEANA TELLEZ (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant O’REILLY AUTO 

ENTERPRISES, LLC (“O’Reilly”) have filed a Stipulation and Joint Motion to Dismiss Certain 

Claims. Upon consideration of the parties’ stipulation and joint motion and finding good cause 

therefore, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ stipulation and ORDERS that: 

1. Plaintiff’s First Cause of Action for Disability Discrimination (Violation of FEHA, 

Govt. Code § 12940 et seq.) as asserted in her Complaint against O’Reilly is dismissed with 

prejudice; 

2. Plaintiff’s Second Cause of Action for Violation of California’s Healthy 

Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014 (Sick Pay Act) as asserted in her Complaint against 

O’Reilly is dismissed with prejudice; 

/ / / 

Case 3:18-cv-00282-VC Document 39 Filed 03/29/19 Page 1 of 2
HIGGS FLETCHER &

MACK LLP 

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

SA N DIEG O

8960275.1 2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION 

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS, CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00282-VC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

3. Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action for Retaliation (Violation of FEHA, Govt. Code 

§ 12940 et seq.) as asserted in her Complaint against O’Reilly is dismissed with prejudice; 

4. Plaintiff’s Fourth Cause of Action for Failure to Maintain Environment Free from 

Discrimination, and Retaliation and Aiding, Abetting, or Inciting the Doing of Such Acts as 

asserted in her Complaint against O’Reilly is dismissed with prejudice; 

5. Plaintiff’s Sixth Cause of Action for Negligence as asserted in her Complaint 

against O’Reilly is dismissed with prejudice; 

6. Plaintiff’s Seventh Cause of Action for Negligent Hiring, Retention, and/or 

Supervision as asserted in her Complaint against O’Reilly is dismissed with prejudice; 

7. Plaintiff’s Ninth Cause of Action for Breach of Implied Contract as asserted in her 

Complaint against O’Reilly is dismissed with prejudice; 

8. Plaintiff’s Thirteenth Cause of Action for Unlawful Business Practices (Violation 

of Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq.) as asserted in her Complaint against O’Reilly is dismissed 

with prejudice; and 

9. Plaintiff’s prayer for punitive damages as asserted in her Complaint against 

O’Reilly is dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: March ___, 2019

Hon. Vince Chhabria 

United States District Judge

29

Case 3:18-cv-00282-VC Document 39 Filed 03/29/19 Page 2 of 2