Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00707/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00707-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)

---

STOEL RIVES LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

AMENDED STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

-1- 1:05-CV-00707-OWW-SMS

Portlnd3-1595506.1 0060014-00004

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

DAVID R. ALBERS (SB #201423) 

ALBERS, BARNES & KOHLER, LLP 

1401 Commercial Way, Suite 220 

Bakersfield, CA 93309 

Telephone: (661) 716-3900 

Facsimile: (661) 716-3899 

DAVID DOUGLAS DOYLE (SB#100595) 

DOYLE, FIKE & WATSON 

1233 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 106 

Fresno, CA 93711 

Telephone: (559) 229-2200 

Facsimile: (559) 225-5504 

LEE N. SMITH (SB #138071) 

MELISSA A. FOSTER (SB #226755) 

STOEL RIVES LLP

770 L Street, Suite 800 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 447-0700 

Facsimile: (916) 447-4781 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION 

ASSOCIATION OF IRRITATED 

RESIDENTS, an unincorporated association, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FRED SCHAKEL DAIRY, a California 

Proprietorship; FRED SCHAKEL, owner and 

operator; SCHAKEL FAMILY 

PARTNERSHIP, a California Limited 

Partnership, owner and operator; AG 

RESOURCES III, a California Limited 

Liability Company, owner; and SOUTH 

LAKES DAIRY, a California general 

partnership, owner and operator, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 1:05-cv-00707-OWW-SMS 

AMENDED STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

ORDER 

Complaint 

filed: 06/01/05 

 Judge: Hon. Sandra M. Snyder 

Pursuant to Court Order dated July 3, 2007, Plaintiff was required to file its Fourth 

Amended Complaint on or about July 6, 2007. Defendants, in turn, were scheduled to respond on 

or about August 6, 2007. On or about July 18, 2007, Defendants associated additional counsel 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00707-LJO-SMS Document 159 Filed 08/03/07 Page 1 of 2
STOEL RIVES LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

AMENDED STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO FOURTH 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

-2- 1:05-CV-00707-OWW-SMS 

Portlnd3-1595506.1 0060014-00004

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

that require time to review the extensive documents and pleadings related to this matter prior to 

responding to the Fourth Amended Complaint. Therefore, the parties to this stipulation, through 

their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate and respectfully request as follows: 

Defendants have up to and including until August 20, 2007 to answer or otherwise 

respond to Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint. 

DATED: August 2, 2007 STOEL RIVES LLP 

By:/S/ ____________________

 LEE N. SMITH 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

DATED: August 2, 2007 CENTER ON RACE, POVERTY & 

 THE ENVIRONMENT 

 By: /S/_______________ __

 LUKE W. COLE 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 8/3/2007 

 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

 Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00707-LJO-SMS Document 159 Filed 08/03/07 Page 2 of 2