Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00574/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00574-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARRISON S. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS VORD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00574-AWI-SMS PC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

SULLIVAN’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION

OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE

COMPLAINT, TO COMMENCE FOLLOWING

SCREENING BY COURT

(Doc. 2)

Plaintiff Garrison S. Johnson (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action. Defendant Sullivan (“defendant”) removed the action from Kern County Superior

Court to this court on April 13, 2007. In conjunction with his notice of removal, defendant moves

for a thirty-day extension of time to respond to the complaint, commencing once the complaint has

been screened by the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 

Good cause having been found, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant’s request for an extension of time to respond to the complaint is

GRANTED; and

///

///

///

///

///

Case 1:07-cv-00574-ROS Document 5 Filed 04/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The court has a large number of cases pending before it and will screen the complaint in due course. 1

2

2. Defendant is relieved of his obligation to respond to the complaint until directed to

do so by the court, at which time defendant will be provided with thirty days to

respond.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 16, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00574-ROS Document 5 Filed 04/16/07 Page 2 of 2