Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_07-cv-05019/USCOURTS-arwd-5_07-cv-05019-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

DAVID L. DANIELS PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 07-5019

BRADLEY L. KARREN, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

NOW on this 2nd day of May 2007, comes on for consideration

the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document #7,

filed on March 8, 2007), and plaintiff’s Objection to Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document #8, filed

March 27, 2007). The Court, being well and sufficiently advised,

finds and orders as follows:

1. That plaintiff’s objections raise nothing either in law or

fact which would require the Court to not accept the findings and

recommendations contained in the said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, those objections are overruled and the said Report and

Recommendation will be approved and adopted in toto. 

2. It follows from the foregoing, that plaintiff is not

eligible to proceed in forma pauperis because of the provisions of

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). However, since plaintiff has already filed

this action, he remains liable for the $350.00 filing fee. In re

Tyler 110 F.3d 528 (8th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, plaintiff will be

ordered to pay to the clerk of court the filing fee of $350.00.

Case 5:07-cv-05019-JLH Document 9 Filed 05/02/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
-2-

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth

herein, plaintiff’s objections to the said Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are overruled and the said

Report and Recommendation is adopted in toto. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g),

plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application (document #2) is hereby

denied and plaintiff is directed to pay to the clerk of court the

$350.00 filing fee associated with the filing of his complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the said Report and

Recommendation, plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed on the grounds

that the claims stated therein are frivolous, fail to state a claim

upon which relief can be granted, and seek relief against

defendants who are immune from suit. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jimm Larry Hendren

JIMM LARRY HENDREN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:07-cv-05019-JLH Document 9 Filed 05/02/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>