Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02993/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02993-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RODERICK L. MITCHELL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

KAMALA D. HARRIS, ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA; and 

JAMES C. SANCHEZ, CITY 

ATTORNEY OF SACRAMENTO, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-2993 MCE AC (PS) 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This proceeding was 

referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). This action is proceeding on plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) (ECF No. 24). 

 On January 29, 2016, the court order plaintiff to show cause why his complaint should not 

be dismissed, in light of his failure to respond to defendants’ motion to dismiss. ECF No. 33. 

Plaintiff has now filed his Opposition to the motion to dismiss. ECF No. 34. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The Order To Show Cause (ECF No. 33) is DISCHARGED. 

 2. Defendants’ Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than February 17, 2016 at 4:30 p.m. 

//// 

//// 

Case 2:14-cv-02993-MCE-AC Document 35 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 3. Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss shall be heard before the undersigned on February 24, 

2016 at 10:00 a.m. 

DATED: February 9, 2016 

Case 2:14-cv-02993-MCE-AC Document 35 Filed 02/10/16 Page 2 of 2