Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00602/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00602-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GOLDYN COOPER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SCOTT HEATLEY, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:12-cv-0602 KJM DAD P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On January 7, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 

filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 

the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

the proper analysis. 

///// 

Case 2:12-cv-00602-KJM-KJN Document 62 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 7, 2015 are adopted in full. 

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 50) is denied without prejudice 

to its re-filing in compliance with the new April 15, 2015 deadline for the filing of 

pretrial motions. 

3. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. 

 SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 11, 2015. 

Case 2:12-cv-00602-KJM-KJN Document 62 Filed 02/12/15 Page 2 of 2