Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07358/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07358-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7358

STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections 

Director; BRYAN P. STIRLING; GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY; ATTORNEY 

GENERAL ALAN WILSON; DEPUTY DIRECTOR ROBERT WARD; SCDC GENERAL 

COUNSEL DAYNE HAILE; CHRISTOPHER FLORIAN; ANN HALLMAN, Agency 

Grievance Coordinator; MARIA LEGGINS, Agency Mailroom 

Coordinator; WILLIE EAGLETON, Evan Warden; ASSOCIATE WARDEN 

MCFADDEN; MAJOR C. WEST; BETHEA LT. MICHAEL TOMS; MS. BAKER, 

Mailroom Coordinator; MS. GRAVES, ECI Grievance Coordinator; 

PAMELA MCDOWELL, Mailroom Supervisor; LT. JAMES MARTIN; SGT. H. 

SIMS; ASSOCIATE WARDEN BUSH, Lee CI; ASSOCIATE WARDEN NOLAN; 

ASSOCIATE WARDEN DEAN; K. RIVERS, Lee CI Grievance Coordinator; 

JIMMY SLEIGH; DEPUTY WARDEN; LT. JACK BROWN; MS. CONYERS, Lee CI 

Officer; GENERAL COUNSEL TATARSKY; DEPUTY DIRECTOR MCCALL; AMY 

SMITH; D. EASTRIDGE; FELICIA MCQUEEN; SANDRA BOWIE; DEPUTY 

WARDEN DAVIS; CAPTAIN THOMAS; MS. WILSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(9:14-cv-01690-DCN)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 15-7358 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Lee Moultrie, Appellant Pro Se. Jerome Scott Kozacki, 

WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7358 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Lee Moultrie appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we 

confine our review to the issues raised in the appellant’s 

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Moultrie’s informal 

brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s 

disposition, Moultrie has forfeited appellate review of the 

court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-7358 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 3 of 3