Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01468/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01468-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IMHOTEP SALAT,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL PIROTTO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-01468 MCE AC

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On January 13, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 41. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 13, 2015, ECF No. 41, are adopted in 

full; and

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 24, is granted without leave to amend as to 

Case 2:14-cv-01468-MCE-AC Document 43 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

plaintiff’s claims for violation of the Federal Financial Privacy Act, 12 U.S.C. § 3400 et seq., and 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on Defendant Pirotto’s investigation of D & I Special Care Services, LLC 

and D & I Special Care Services.

Dated: February 12, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-01468-MCE-AC Document 43 Filed 02/13/15 Page 2 of 2