Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01418/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01418-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 140
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The caption has been amended according to the Dismissal of Doe 1

Defendants portion of this Order.

The failure of one or more of the parties to participate in 2

the preparation of the Joint Status Report does not excuse the other

parties from their obligation to timely file a status report in

accordance with this Order. In the event a party fails to participate

as ordered, the party timely submitting the status report shall include

a declaration explaining why it was unable to obtain the cooperation of

the other party or parties.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN C. HERNANDEZ, ) 2:09-cv-1418-GEB-EFB

)

Plaintiff, ) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

v. ) CONFERENCE AND RULE 4(M)

 ) NOTICE

AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, )

INC.; AMERICAN BROKERS CONDUIT; )

AHMSI DEFAULT SERVICES, INC.; )

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION )

SYSTEMS, INC.; DEUTSCHE BANK )

NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY; RAYMOND ) 

MCCOY; GURMIT SINGH; DOUGLAS TODD )

CECIL, )

) 

Defendants. )

1

)

Plaintiff’s Status Report filed on January 14, 2010 reveals

this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference (“status conference”) set for

February 1, 2010 is continued to March 15, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. A

further joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14)

days prior to the status conference.2

Case 2:09-cv-01418-GEB-EFB Document 26 Filed 01/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Further, Plaintiff is notified under Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure (“Rule”) 4(m) that Defendant Douglas Todd Cecil could be

dismissed as a defendant in this action under Rule 4(m) unless

Plaintiff provides proof of service and/or “shows good cause for the

failure” to serve this Defendant within Rule 4(m)’s 120 day prescribed

period, in a filing due no later than 4:00 p.m. on February 5, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:09-cv-01418-GEB-EFB Document 26 Filed 01/28/10 Page 2 of 2