Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00137/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00137-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 362
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1402 Medical Malpractice

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSICA BUCKLEY, NO. CIV.S-06-0137 LKK DAD PS

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

This action has been assigned to United States District

Judge Lawrence K. Karlton and pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21)

has been referred to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for all purposes

encompassed by that provision. 

This matter came before the court on May 12, 2006, at 11:00

a.m. for a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference. There was no

appearance on behalf of plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se. Bobbie

J. Montoya appeared on behalf of defendant United States of America,

who has been substituted in the place of Jagdeep Bal and Del Norte

Health Center, who are no longer defendants and out of this case. 

Case 2:06-cv-00137-LKK -DAD Document 13 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Defendant Walgreen’s Pharmacy was dismissed from this action 1

prior to its removal to federal court.

2

See 28 U.S.C. 2679(d)(1); United States v. Adams, 420 F.3d 1049, 1051

(9th Cir. 2005). There was no appearance on behalf of defendant

Oroville Hospital, the only other remaining defendant in this

action.1

There is no indication in the court file that plaintiff has

completed service of process on defendant Oroville Hospital and

plaintiff has not filed a status report. As noted, plaintiff also

failed to appear at the status conference despite having been served

with the order setting status conference.

Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in

writing within twenty (20) days why this case should not be dismissed

for failure to prosecute. Failure to timely file the required

writing may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not

limited to dismissal of this action.

DATED: May 12, 2006.

DAD:th

Ddad1\orders.prose\buckley0137.osc

Case 2:06-cv-00137-LKK -DAD Document 13 Filed 05/15/06 Page 2 of 2