Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03723/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03723-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1120.02P216PYP -1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-2800/C03-3723 TEH)

PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)

PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

The Latham Square Building

1611 Telegraph Ave., Suite 1450

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-0292

Facsimile: (510) 452-5625

HOWARD MOORE, JR., ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 55228)

MOORE & MOORE

445 Bellevue, Suite 202

Oakland, CA 94610

Telephone: (510) 451-0104

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CLARK WALKER

SILVANO B. MARCHESI (SBN 42965)

County Counsel

GREGORY C. HARVEY (SBN 47974)

Deputy County Counsel

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

651 Pine Street, 9th Floor

Martinez, California 94553

Telephone: (925) 335-1800

Facsimile: (925) 335-1866

Email: bknap@cc.cccounty.us

Attorneys for Defendants

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, ET AL.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARK WALKER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, KEITH

RICHTER, and RICHARD GRACE,

Defendants.

 

AND RELATED CASE.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NOS. C05-2800 TEH 

C03-3723 TEH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE

OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ BILL

OF COSTS 

Case 3:03-cv-03723-TEH Document 298 Filed 03/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1120.02P216PYP -2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-2800/C03-3723 TEH)

Plaintiff CLARK WALKER (“Chief Walker”) and Defendants CONTRA COSTA

COUNTY, KEITH RICHTER, and RICHARD GRACE, by and through their respective counsel,

hereby stipulate pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, to enlarge the time for Chief Walker to file his

Objections to Defendants’ Bill of Costs by one business day from March 2, 2007 to March 5, 2007.

Good cause exists to enlarge the date to file Chief Walker’s Objections to

Defendants’ Bill of Costs in that allow counsel additional time to exchange authorities and continue

the process of meeting and conferring on the objections. This additional time will facilitate the

Court’s review of any remaining objections to be filed by Chief Walker. Therefore, the parties

jointly respectfully request that the Court issue an Order enlarging the time to file Chief Walker’s

objections from March 2, 2007 to March 5, 2007.

DATED: March 2, 2007 PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

 /s/

 

PAMELA Y. PRICE, Attorneys for 

Plaintiff CLARK WALKER

DATED: March 2, 2007 SILVANO B. MARCHESI, County Counsel

 /s/

 

GREGORY C. HARVEY, Deputy County Counsel,

Attorneys for Defendants CONTRA COSTA

COUNTY, KEITH RICHTER, and RICHARD

GRACE

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Chief Walker to file his Objections to Defendants’ Bill of

Costs shall be enlarged by one business day from March 2, 2007 to March 5, 2007

Date: _____________ 

HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

03/02/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:03-cv-03723-TEH Document 298 Filed 03/06/07 Page 2 of 2