Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00203/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00203-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRlCT OF CALIFORNIA

JOAN KUBOT A,

CASE NO. C 06-00203 11..

Plaintiff(s),

STIPULA 'I10N AND [pROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v.

CITY Of ~CHMOND, a municj~lity,

CHARLES WHITNEY, a.n individual, etaJ.

Dcfcnda1)t(s).

I

Counsel report that they have JDct and conforred regarding ADR and ha~ r~cl1ed the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5;

The partie~ agree to participate in tbe following ADR process

Conrt Pro(:esses:

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. S}

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: PartieJ who believe that 1218 early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge i.s

appreciably more Itkely to meet their needs than any other form Qf ADR. rnu..'i participate in an

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for

ADR Phone Conf(!r~nce. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Pri"atE Process;

, Private ADR (please identify proceas and provider) Mediation/jAMS

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

the presumptive deadline (The deadltne is 90 dQys from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR proce,fJ' unlus otherwiSe ordered. )

other reque~ted deadliae

Dated: 3121/06

Dated: 3/21/06

Case 3:06-cv-00203-JL Document 12 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
[rROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant 10 the Stipulation above, tl1e captioned matter is hereby referred to:

Non-binding Arbitration

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)

Mediation

Private ADR

Deadline for ADR sessjon

90 days from the date of this order,

other

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

UNlTED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00203-JL Document 12 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2