Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03249/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03249-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S LABOR CODE § 201 CLAIM

MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN: 166805)

MARCIE S. ISOM (SBN: 226906)

GORDON & REES LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 986-5900

Facsimile: (415) 986-8054

Attorneys for Defendants

WELLS FARGO & CO., GREATER BAY BANCORP,

THE GREATER BAY BANCORP CHANGE

IN CONTROL PLAN I

HARRY G. LEWIS (SBN: 157705)

BRIAN DONNELLY (SBN: 162987)

EVELYN LOW (SBN: 66636)

CORNERSTONE LAW GROUP

595 Market Street, Suite 2360

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 974-1900

Facsimile: (415) 974-6433

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SUSAN BIBA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN BIBA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware

Corporation; GREATER BAY BANCORP, a

California Corporation; THE GREATER BAY

BANCORP CHANGE IN CONTROL PLAN I,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CV093249MEJ

STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE

PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH CLAIM

FOR VIOLATION OF LABOR

CODE § 201 CLAIM

Case 3:09-cv-03249-MEJ Document 22 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gordon

&

Rees L

L

P

2

75 B

attery

Street, S

uite 2

0

0

0

S

a

n

Fra

ncisco, C

A 94111

- 2 -

STIPULATED JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S LABOR CODE § 201 CLAIM

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff SUSAN BIBA (“Plaintiff”) and

Defendant WELLS FARGO & CO. (“Defendant”) that judgment shall be entered in favor of

Plaintiff against Defendant with respect to the Fourth Claim of Plaintiff’s Complaint for

Damages which alleges Defendant’s violation of California Labor Code Section 201. Defendant

has paid Plaintiff all penalties and interest related to this Claim. Plaintiff shall be awarded her

reasonable costs and fees related to this Claim pursuant to Labor Code Section 218.5. The

amount of fees and costs to be awarded to Plaintiff shall be determined by agreement of the

parties or by post-judgment motion.

Dated: May 20, 2010 CORNERSTONE LAW GROUP

By: /s/

HARRY LEWIS

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: May 20, 2010 GORDON & REES, LLP

By: /s/

MARCIE S. ISOM

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

The Honorable Maria-Elena James

United States Chief Magistrate Judge

WFB/1059244/7906991v.1

May 24, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-03249-MEJ Document 22 Filed 05/24/10 Page 2 of 2