Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00201/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00201-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 423
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157
Cause of Action: 28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

GABRIEL DICK and DEBORAH JILL 

DICK,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE 

SERVICING, INC.; TOWN AND 

COUNTRY TITLE SERVICES; 

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE, CO.; 

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST; 

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE 

SECURITIES, INC.; CITI 

RESIDENTIAL LENDING, as 

attorney in fact for 

Ameriquest Home Mortgage 

Securities, Inc.; POWER 

DEFAULT SERVICES; and DOES 1-

50, inclusive,

Defendants.

CIV. NO. 2:13-00201 WBS CKD

NINTH CIR. NO. 14-15203

ORDER

----oo0oo----

Plaintiffs Gabriel and Jill Dick initiated this suit 

against defendants alleging three causes of action for wrongful 

foreclosure of their home, fraud, and cancellation of 

Case 2:13-cv-00201-WBS-CKD Document 106 Filed 05/27/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

instruments. (Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”) (Docket No. 41).) On 

January 14, 2014, this court dismissed plaintiffs’ SAC with 

prejudice, (Jan. 14, 2014 Order (Docket No. 72)), and plaintiffs 

appealed, (Docket No. 74). The Ninth Circuit remanded the case 

for reconsideration in light of the California Supreme Court’s 

decision in Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp., 62 Cal. 4th 

919 (2016). (Docket No. 79.) 

In light of Yvanova,

1 this court hereby VACATES its 

dismissal of plaintiffs’ wrongful foreclosure and cancellation of 

instruments claims. The court does not amend or vacate its 

dismissal of plaintiffs’ fraud claim. The Clerk of this court 

shall forward a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 26, 2016

 

1 See also Sciarratta v. United States Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 

No. D069439, 2016 WL 2941194, at *1 (4th Dist. May 18, 2016) 

(applying Yvanova and concluding “that a homeowner who has been 

foreclosed on by one with no right to do so--by those facts 

alone--sustains prejudice or harm sufficient to constitute a 

cause of action for wrongful foreclosure”). 

Case 2:13-cv-00201-WBS-CKD Document 106 Filed 05/27/16 Page 2 of 2