Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01099/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01099-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

Stipulation to Augment the Scheduling Order

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JILL L. RYTHER

MICHELLE V. PAUL

RYTHER LAW GROUP

8560 W. Sunset Blvd., Ste. 500

West Hollywood, CA 90069

Telephone 424-272-4706

Fax 310-773-9192

Attorneys for Plaintiff Trisha Newman

James D. Weakley, Esq. Bar No. 082853

Leslie M. Dillahunty, Esq. Bar No. 195262

Weakley & Arendt, LLP

1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176

Fresno, California 93710

Telephone: (559) 221-5256

Facsimile: (559) 221-5262

Jim@walaw-fresno.com

Leslie@walaw-fresno.com

Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF FRESNO, also erroneously separately sued as 

FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, and FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

OFFICER HERNANDEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRISHA NEWMAN,

Plaintiff,

v. 

COUNTY OF FRESNO, a public entity; 

FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT, a public entity; and 

FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

OFFICER HERNANDEZ, individually and 

in his official capacity,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-01099-DAD-MJS

STIPULATION TO AUGMENT 

SCHEDULING ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Case 1:16-cv-01099-DAD-BAM Document 17 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 3
2

Stipulation to Augment the Scheduling Order

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This stipulation is entered into by and between the plaintiff and the defendants, by and 

through their respective counsel.

1. The parties have been diligent in their efforts to move this case forward. 

Several depositions have been completed and discovery has been propounded and responded 

to. Nevertheless, the parties have agreed that they need some additional time to complete 

discovery and to submit their expert witness declarations. 

2. This is the parties’ first request to augment the scheduling order.

3. Based on the foregoing, the parties seek leave to augment the scheduling order 

as follows:

Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff from February 28, 2017, to March 14, 2017.

Expert Disclosure from March 7, 2017, to March 21, 2017.

Supplemental/Rebuttal Expert Report from April 7, 2017, to April 21, 2017

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, subject to approval 

by this Court, that the Scheduling Order be augmented as set forth above.

DATED: February 28, 2017 LAW OFFICE OF JILL L. RYTHER

By: /s/ Jill L. Ryther _

 Jill L. Ryther 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Trisha Newman

DATED: February 28, 2017 WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP

By: /s/ Leslie M. Dillahunty__________ 

Leslie M. Dillahunty

James D. Weakley

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 1:16-cv-01099-DAD-BAM Document 17 Filed 03/01/17 Page 2 of 3
3

Stipulation to Augment the Scheduling Order

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the STIPULATION TO AUGMENT SCHEDULING 

ORDER in Case No.: 1:16-cv-01099-DAD-MJS is accepted and its terms adopted as 

the Order of this Court, as follows:

1. The deadline for non-expert discovery is extended to March 14, 2017.

2. The deadline for initial disclosure of experts is extended to March 21, 2017.

3. The deadline for Supplemental/Rebuttal Expert disclosures is extended to 

April 21, 2017

4. All other dates and deadline shall remain as set forth in the Scheduling 

Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 1, 2017 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01099-DAD-BAM Document 17 Filed 03/01/17 Page 3 of 3