Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01141/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01141-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRANDON EUGENE HUNTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRENNEMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:22-cv-1141 DJC CKD P

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a motion asking that the court compel defendants to respond to requests 

for discovery. However, plaintiff does not identify which responses are inadequate. Instead, he 

complains about the defendants’ responses in general terms. Because plaintiff has not shown that 

any particular response by defendants to any particular request for discovery is inadequate, 

plaintiff’s motion to compel will be denied.

While not entirely clear, it also appears plaintiff asserts that certain responses were not 

timely. Plaintiff appears to be under the misimpression that defendants had 30 days to respond to 

his requests for discovery. However, in the court’s April 21, 2023 order, the parties were advised 

that any response to any request for discovery is due 45 days after the request is served. 

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:22-cv-01141-DC-CKD Document 45 Filed 01/10/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

For all the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to 

compel (ECF No. 37) is denied. 

Dated: January 10, 2024

1

hunt1141.mtc

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-01141-DC-CKD Document 45 Filed 01/10/24 Page 2 of 2