Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923-58/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

DECHERT LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF SYNOPSYS, INC.’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCS. UNDER SEAL PURSUANT 1

TO CIV. LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5 RELATING TO SYNOPSYS’ MEMO. IN OPP. TO MAGMA’S MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION AND LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER TO 3rd AMENDED COMPLAINT; CASE NO.: C-04-03923 MMC (JCS) 10324812

Chris Scott Graham (State Bar No. 114498) 

chris.scott.graham@dechert.com 

Michael N. Edelman (State Bar No. 180948) 

michael.edelman@dechert.com 

DECHERT LLP 

1117 California Avenue

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1013 

Telephone: 650.813.4800 

Facsimile: 650.813.4848 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

SYNOPSYS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

v.

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, a 

Delaware corporation, 

Defendant and Counter-Claimant. 

Case No. C 04-03923 MMC (JCS) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFF SYNOPSYS, INC.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 

7-11 AND 79-5 RELATING TO 

SYNOPSYS’ MEMORANDUM IN 

OPPOSITION TO MAGMA DESIGN 

AUTOMATION INC.’S MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION AND LEAVE TO 

AMEND ANSWER TO THIRD 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) filed an Administrative 

Motion, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, requesting to file under seal certain 

documents submitted in connection with Synopsys’ Memorandum in Opposition to Magma 

Design Automation Inc.’s Motion for Reconsideration and Leave to Amend Answer and 

Counterclaims. 

Having considered Synopsys’ Administrative Motion, and for good cause appearing 

therefore, the Court GRANTS Synopsys’ request and orders that the following documents are to 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 922 Filed 01/06/06 Page 1 of 2
DECHERT LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF SYNOPSYS, INC.’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCS. UNDER SEAL PURSUANT 2

TO CIV. LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5 RELATING TO SYNOPSYS’ MEMO. IN OPP. TO MAGMA’S MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION AND LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER TO 3rd AMENDED COMPLAINT; CASE NO.: C-04-03923 MMC (JCS) 10324812

be filed under seal: the entirety of Exhibits 4-9 and 16-18 to the Declaration of Michael N. 

Edelman. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________________ ______________________________________ 

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

January 6, 2006

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 922 Filed 01/06/06 Page 2 of 2