Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00393/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00393-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1241046.2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

CASE NO. C 07-00393 (SC)

JEROME C. ROTH (SBN 159483)

MATTHEW J. SPENCE (SBN 247145)

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

560 Mission Street

Twenty-Seventh Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105-2907

Telephone: (415) 512-4000

Facsimile: (415) 512-4077

jerome.roth@mto.com

matthew.spence@mto.com

Attorneys for Defendant

LG. PHILIPS LCD AMERICA, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ART S TV & APPLIANCE, individually and 

on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiff,

vs.

LG. Philips LCD Co. Ltd., LG. Philips LCD 

America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.; 

Sharp Corporation; Sharp Electronics 

Corporation; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba 

Matsushita Display Technology Co., Ltd.; 

Hitachi Ltd.; Hitachi Displays, Ltd.; Hitachi 

America Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic Devices 

(USA), Inc.; Sanyo Epson Imaging Devices 

Corporation; NEC Corporation; NEC LCD 

Technologies, Ltd.; NEC Electronics America, 

Inc.; IDT International Ltd.; AU Optronics; 

International Display Technology Co., Ltd.; 

International Display Technology USA Inc.; 

AU Optronics Corporation America; Chi Mei 

Optoelectronics; Chi Mei Optoelectronics 

USA, Inc.; Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.; 

Hannstar Display Corporation;

Defendants. CASE NO. C 07-00393 (SC)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Honorable Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-00393-SC Document 5 Filed 02/05/2007 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:07-cv-00393-SI Document 10 Filed 02/12/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1241046.2 - 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

CASE NO. C 07-00393 (SC)

WHEREAS plaintiff filed a complaint in the above-captioned case on or about 

January 19, 2007;

WHEREAS plaintiff alleges antitrust violations by manufacturers of Liquid 

Crystal Display ( LCD ) products;

WHEREAS more than fifteen complaints have been filed to date in federal district 

courts throughout the United States by plaintiffs purporting to bringing class actions on behalf of 

indirect purchasers alleging antitrust violations by manufacturers of LCD products (collectively, the LCD Cases );

WHEREAS there is a motion pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict 

Litigation to transfer the LCD Cases to the Northern District of California for coordinated or 

consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407;

WHEREAS plaintiff anticipates the possibility of Consolidated Amended 

Complaints in the LCD Cases;

WHEREAS plaintiff and LG. Philips LCD America, Inc. ( LPL America ) have

agreed that an orderly schedule for any response to the pleadings in the LCD Cases would be 

more efficient for the parties and for the Court;

WHEREAS plaintiff agrees that the deadline for LPL America to respond to the 

Complaint shall be extended until the earlier of the following two dates: (1) forty-five days after 

the filing of a Consolidated Amended Complaint in the LCD Cases; or (2) forty-five days after 

plaintiff provides written notice to LPL America that he does not intend to file a Consolidated 

Amended Complaint, provided that such notice may be given only after the initial case

management conference in the MDL transferee court in this case;

WHEREAS plaintiff further agrees that this extension is available, without further 

stipulation with counsel for plaintiff, to all named defendants who notify plaintiff in writing of 

their intention to join this extension;

WHEREAS this Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by LPL America or any 

defendant of any defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal or subject 

Case 3:07-cv-00393-SC Document 5 Filed 02/05/2007 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:07-cv-00393-SI Document 10 Filed 02/12/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1241046.2 - 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

CASE NO. C 07-00393 (SC)

matter jurisdiction, insufficiency of process, insufficiency of service of process, or improper 

venue.

PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT LPL AMERICA, BY AND THROUGH THEIR 

RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The deadline for LPL America to respond to the Complaint shall be 

extended until the earlier of the following two dates (1) forty-five days after the filing of a 

Consolidated Amended Complaint in the LCD Cases; or (2) forty-five days after the plaintiff 

provides written notice that he does not intend to file a Consolidated Amended Complaint, 

provided that such notice may be given only after the initial case management conference in the 

MDL transferee court in this case.

2. This extension is available, without further stipulation with counsel for 

plaintiff or further order of the Court, to all named defendants who notify plaintiff in writing of 

their intention to join this extension.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: February 5, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

By: /s/ Matthew J. Spence

JEROME C. ROTH

MATTHEW J. SPENCE

Attorneys for Defendant

LG PHILLIPS LCD AMERICA, INC

Of Counsel:

Michael R. Lazerwitz

Jeremy J. Calsyn

Lee F. Berger

CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN &

 HAMILTON LLP

2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: (202) 974-1500

Facsimile: (202) 974-1999

Case 3:07-cv-00393-SC Document 5 Filed 02/05/2007 Page 3 of 4
 Case 3:07-cv-00393-SI Document 10 Filed 02/12/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1241046.2 - 3 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

CASE NO. C 07-00393 (SC)

DATED: February 5, 2007 FURTH LEHMANN & GRANT LLP

By: /s/ Jon T. King

MICHAEL P. LEHMANN

THOMAS P. DOVE

CHRISTOPHER L. LEBSOCK

JON T. KING

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ART S TV & APPLIANCE

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO 

ORDERED:

Dated: _____________________ ______________________________________ Honorable Samuel Conti

Judge of the United States District Court

CERTIFICATION

I, Matthew J. Spence, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file 

this Stipulation For Extension Of Time. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby 

attest that Jon T. King has concurred in this filing.

Case 3:07-cv-00393-SC Document 5 Filed 02/05/2007 Page 4 of 4

2/9/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-00393-SI Document 10 Filed 02/12/07 Page 4 of 4