Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04898/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04898-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The Court also DENIES Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Motion For Order Shortening Time For Hearing On Plaintiffs’ Motion

To Reconsider Court Order Allowing GEICO To File Counterclaim. (Docket No. 245.) 

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

G&C AUTO BODY INC,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant. /

No. C06-04898 MJJ

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO RECONSIDER COURT

ORDER ALLOWING GEICO TO FILE

COUNTERCLAIM

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion To Reconsider Court Order Allowing GEICO To File

Counterclaim. (Docket No. 245.) The issues raised by Plaintiffs’ motion – specifically, the allegation

that Defendant filed a counterclaim that exceeded the scope of the leave granted by the Court – do not

provide a basis upon which this Court would reconsider its decision to grant leave in the first place.

Plaintiffs’ separate motion to strike the portions of the counterclaim that were not contained in the

proposed counterclaim previously reviewed by this Court, which is noticed for hearing on January 8,

2008, provides an adequate remedy for the conduct of which Plaintiffs complain. Accordingly, the

Court DENIES the motion to reconsider.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2007 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-04898-JSW Document 288 Filed 12/12/07 Page 1 of 1