Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05085/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05085-59/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50750/2132033.1 Case No. 03 05085 (WWS)

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING: (1) THE IDENTIFICATION OF NEW WITNESSES BY DEFENDANTS; 

AND (2) DEFENDANTS' SUBPOENA TO MICROSOFT

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502) 

 Deepak Gupta (Bar No. 226991) 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

 Evette D. Pennypacker (Bar No. 203515) 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Telephone: (650) 501-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 501-5001 

Attorneys for Defendants 

REALNETWORKS, INC. AND LISTEN.COM 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

FRISKIT, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

REALNETWORKS, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

 CASE NO. 03 05085 (WWS) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING: (1) 

THE IDENTIFICATION OF NEW 

WITNESSES BY DEFENDANTS; AND (2) 

DEFENDANTS' SUBPOENA TO 

MICROSOFT 

Case 3:03-cv-05085-WWS Document 688-2 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-05085-WWS Document 694 Filed 06/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50750/2132033.1 -2- Case No. 03 05085 (WWS)

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING: (1) THE IDENTIFICATION OF NEW WITNESSES BY DEFENDANTS;

AND (2) DEFENDANTS' SUBPOENA TO MICROSOFT

By letter brief dated April 17, 2007 Plaintiff Friskit raised issues concerning Defendants’ 

April 12, 2007 service of Supplemental Initial Disclosures and Defendants’ service on April 13, 

2007 of a subpoena for the production of documents and a deposition of Microsoft Corporation on 

April 24 and April 27, respectively. On April 23, 2007, the Court notified the parties it would 

hold a hearing on Plaintiff's letter brief on April 24 at 10:00 a.m. Defendants responded to 

Plaintiff’s letter brief the evening of April 23, 2007. On April 24, 2007, the Court conducted the 

telephonic conference concerning the issues raised in the letters. At the April 24, 2007 telephonic 

conference, Friskit requested an extension of time in which to file its statements of expert 

testimony due April 27, 2007. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Plaintiffs' request to bar Defendants from calling Anu Kirk and Bob Kimball at trial 

is granted. 

2. Plaintiff's request for a protective order as to Defendants’ April 2007 subpoena on 

Microsoft Corporation is granted. Defendants counsel shall notify Microsoft Corporation of the 

issuance of the Protective Order. 

3. Friskit’s request for a two week extension to file its statements of expert testimony 

due April 27, 2007 is denied without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________, 2007 ________________________

WILLIAM W. SCHWARZER 

Senior United States District Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-05085-WWS Document 688-2 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 2 of 2

June 1

Case 3:03-cv-05085-WWS Document 694 Filed 06/01/07 Page 2 of 2