Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01668/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01668-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

Case Nos. 05-CV-01668 and 05-CV-01766 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Juanita Brooks (CA No. 75934, brooks@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

12390 El Camino Real

San Diego, California 92130

Telephone: (858) 678-5070

Facsimile: (858) 678-5099

John M. Farrell (CA No. 99649, jfarrell@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

Redwood City, California 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Ruffin B. Cordell (pro hac vice - cordell@fr.com)

Joseph V. Colaianni (pro hac vice - colaianni@fr.com)

Timothy W. Riffe (pro hac vice - riffe@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

1425 K Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005

Telephone: (202) 783-5070

Facsimile: (202) 783-2331

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant

INTEL CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN JOSE DIVISION)

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (USA),

Defendants and CounterClaimants.

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant and Counter-Claimant.

Case No. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL)

Case No. 05-01766 RMW (HRL)

(Consolidated Through Claim Construction)

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND

ORDER RE: BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 89 Filed 05/04/06 Page 1 of 5
2

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

Case Nos. 05-CV-01668 and 05-CV-01766 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Following the Case Management Conference held on March 24, 2006, the Court adopted a

briefing schedule for summary judgment motions which implicate claim construction issues. The

parties have encountered unexpected difficulties in scheduling several depositions and therefore

request all dates in the briefing schedule be extended by two weeks, as shown in the table below.

The parties also request that the date for the hearing on the summary judgment motions

and claim construction be rescheduled for either August 22 or August 29, 2006, to accommodate

vacation schedules in the first two weeks in August. All counsel prefer the August 29, 2006 date.

Additionally, the Technology Tutorial could not go forward on April 25, 2006 because

plaintiff’s counsel suffered a broken ankle. In light of that injury and to accommodate other

counsel’s trial schedule, the parties request that the Technology Tutorial take place on July 25,

2006 at 1:30 p.m.

Event Former Date Proposed New Date

Deadline for filing dispositive summary

judgment motions which implicate claim

construction issues.

May 5, 2006 May 19, 2006

Deadline for filing any motions pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f) in response to the

above summary judgment motions

May 26, 2006 June 9, 2006

Deadline for filing oppositions to the above

summary judgment motions

June 16, 2006 June 30, 2006

Deadline for filing reply briefs in support of

the above summary judgment motions

June 30, 2006 July 14, 2006

Technology Tutorial April 25, 2006 at

1:30 p.m.

August 15, 2006 at 

1:30 p.m.

Hearing on summary judgment motions and

claim construction

July 25, 2006 at

9:00 a.m 

Further CMC after claim construction ruling To be set in ruling Same 

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 89 Filed 05/04/06 Page 2 of 5
3

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

Case Nos. 05-CV-01668 and 05-CV-01766 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 27, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ John M. Farrell

John M. Farrell

Juanita Brooks

Timothy W. Riffe (pro hac vice)

Ruffin B. Cordell (pro hac vice)

Joseph V. Colaianni (pro hac vice)

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant

INTEL CORPORATION

Dated: April 27, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Jennifer Ochs

Robert P. Feldman

Jennifer Ochs

Maura Rees

Matthew R. Reed

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Claimants

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., USA

Dated: April 27, 2006 HENNIGAN BENNETT & DORMAN LLP

By: /s/ Lawrence M. Hadley

Lawrence M. Hadley

Omer Salik

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY

CORPORATION

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 89 Filed 05/04/06 Page 3 of 5
4

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

Case Nos. 05-CV-01668 and 05-CV-01766 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that:

1. The “new dates” for the briefing schedule described above is adopted.

2. The date for the hearing on summary judgment motions and claim construction

shall be: .

Dated:

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 89 Filed 05/04/06 Page 4 of 5
5

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

Case Nos. 05-CV-01668 and 05-CV-01766 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45.X

I, John M. Farrell, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

obtained from each of the signatories.

Dated: April 27, 2006 By: /s/ John M. Farrell

John M. Farrell

50344924.doc

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 89 Filed 05/04/06 Page 5 of 5