Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00060/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00060-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672

Attorney General of California

JON S. ALLIN, State Bar No. 155069

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

MAUREEN C. ONYEAGBAKO, State Bar No. 238419

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 322-7119

Fax: (916) 324-5205

E-mail: Maureen.Onyeagbako@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendants Schwarzenegger, Beard, 

Brazelton, Cate, Hartley, Hubbard, Hysen, Kernan, 

Meyer, Rothchild, Schwartz-Reagle, and Yates

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

COREY LAMAR SMITH, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants.

1:14-cv-00060-LJO-SAB

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO 

RESPOND TO REQUEST FOR 

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

The parties stipulate as follows:

1. This action is currently on appeal before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals as 

No. 15-17155.

2. On June 14, 2016, this Court ordered the perpetuation of Plaintiff Garland Baker’s 

testimony under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 27(b). (ECF No. 211.)

3. All parties desire to conduct a meaningful deposition to perpetuate Baker’s testimony.

4. In order to facilitate a meaningful deposition, Baker agrees to respond to Defendants’ 

Requests for Production of Documents under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34. Baker has 

represented that he will provide meaningful responses; however, if any Defendant is dissatisfied 

Case 1:14-cv-00060-LJO-SAB Document 214 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

with the responses and/or corresponding production, this will not entitle that party to file 

emergency motions seeking additional information, or otherwise upset or delay the scheduled 

deposition set for September 22, 2016. Defendants are not precluded from taking up these issues; 

they are simply agreeing to address such issues without delaying the deposition.

5. Baker has represented that he will provide the responses and the documents via a 

flash drive that will be deposited with Federal Express on September 7, 2016, for next-day 

delivery. As indicated, the deposition is scheduled for September 22, 2016. 

6. The parties are engaging in the deposition and document production solely for the 

purpose of perpetuating Baker’s testimony. No discovery is permitted as to any other individual 

or issue in this case.

So stipulated.

Dated: September 2, 2016 OFFICES OF PAVONE & FONNER, LLP

/s/ Benjamin Pavone

(as authorized on September 2, 2016)

____________________________________________

BENJAMIN PAVONE

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: September 2, 2016 KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

JON S. ALLIN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

/s/ Maureen C. Onyeagbako

_____________________________________________

MAUREEN C. ONYEAGBAKO

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants Schwarzenegger,

Beard, Brazelton, Cate, Hartley, Hubbard, 

Hysen, Kernan, Meyer, Rothchild, SchwartzReagle, and Yates

Dated: September 2, 2016 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP

/s/ Kristina D. Gruenberg

(as authorized on September 2, 2016)

_____________________________________________

SUSAN E. COLEMAN

KRISTINA D. GRUENBERG 

Attorneys for Defendants Winslow and Igbinosa

Case 1:14-cv-00060-LJO-SAB Document 214 Filed 09/06/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 2, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00060-LJO-SAB Document 214 Filed 09/06/16 Page 3 of 3