Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-05199/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-05199-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1

Case No.: 12-CV-05199-LHK

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JOHN BARRERA,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.,

Defendant.

Case No.:12-CV-05199-LHK 

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO 

VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

Re: Dkt. No. 106

On March 5, 2015, the parties filed a notice of settlement.1ECF No. 106. In the notice, the 

parties state that they “have reached an agreement to settle plaintiff’s claims in this action,” and 

further state that the parties are “working to finalize the language and terms of the settlement 

agreement.” Id. at 1. The parties request that the Court “take the case management conference, 

currently scheduled for March 11, 2015 at 2 p.m., off calendar.” Id. The parties do not state how 

long they need to finalize the language and terms of their settlement agreement. See id.

This is the second time the parties have requested a continuance of a case management 

conference to finalize the terms of their settlement. On February 4, 2015, the parties filed a 

 

1

The settlement pertains to Plaintiff John Barrera, Jr.’s individual claims against Defendant The 

Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. See ECF No. 99. Currently pending before the Court is final approval of 

related class claims against Defendant The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. See ECF No. 103.

Case 5:12-cv-05199-LHK Document 107 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 12-CV-05199-LHK

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

stipulation stating that they had “reached an agreement in principle to settle plaintiff’s claims in 

this action and are currently negotiating the language and terms of the settlement agreement.” ECF 

No. 97 at 1. The parties did not state how long they needed to finalize the settlement. See id.

However, the parties requested that the Court continue the case management conference, then 

scheduled for February 11, 2015, to March 11, 2015. Id. The Court granted the parties’ request on 

February 4, 2015. ECF No. 99.

The parties’ current request to vacate the case management conference, ECF No. 106, is 

DENIED. The parties shall file, by Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 2 p.m., a joint statement with a 

deadline by which the parties will file a joint stipulation of dismissal. The case management 

conference remains as set on March 11, 2015, at 2 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2015

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:12-cv-05199-LHK Document 107 Filed 03/09/15 Page 2 of 2