Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00039/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00039-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL LEE McKELLY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0039 GEB JFM P

vs.

STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT,

et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

In an order filed February 2, 2006, this court found that plaintiff has, on at least

three occasions, suffered dismissals of lawsuits filed in this district on the grounds that said

actions were frivolous or malicious or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,

and that plaintiff had not in this action alleged facts which suggest that he is under imminent

danger of serious physical injury. For those reasons, the court further found, in accordance with

the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), plaintiff was precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis

with this action. The court therefore denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and

directed plaintiff to pay within twenty days the $250.00 filing fee for this action. In addition, the

court cautioned plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed. The twenty day period has expired and plaintiff has not paid the

filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order

Case 2:06-cv-00039-GEB -JFM Document 8 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 1, 2006.

 

/mcke0039.fpf

Case 2:06-cv-00039-GEB -JFM Document 8 Filed 03/01/06 Page 2 of 2