Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01469/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01469-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMMY ALLEN; BROOKE ALLEN (a )

minor), by and through her legal )

representative TOMMY ALLEN, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

FRESNO CITY POLICE OFFICERS )

DERIK KUMAGAI and VALERIE )

DUNN; FRESNO POLICE DETECTIVE )

ROBERT LINCOLN; FRESNO )

COUNTY SHERIFF DEPUTIES )

CHRISTIAN CURTICE, JARED )

WILLIAMSON, and ROMEO )

GRAJEDA; UNKNOWN LAW )

ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS; and )

COUNTY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, )

)

Defendants )

____________________________________)

CV F F-06-1469 AWI SMS

ORDER VACATING

HEARING DATE OF MARCH

26, 2007, AND TAKING

MATTER UNDER

SUBMISSION

In this action by plaintiffs Tommy Allen and Brooke Allen (“Plaintiffs”) for damages

for violation of civil rights against the County of Fresno and several individual law

enforcement officers (“Defendants”), Defendants have noticed for hearing and decision a

motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint or, in the alternative, for a more

definite statement. Plaintiff’s opposition, which was due not later than March 12, 2007, was

filed on March 20, 2007. Consequently, Plaintiffs may not oppose Defendants’ motion at

oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(b). The court has reviewed Defendants’ motion and

Case 1:06-cv-01469-AWI -SMS Document 35 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Plaintiffs opposition and finds the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. 

Local Rule 78-230(h). 

THEREFORE, the court HEREBY ORDERS that the hearing date for consideration

of Defendants’ motion to dismiss, currently set for March 26, 2007, is hereby VACATED,

and no party shall appear at that time. As of March 26, 2007, the court will take the matter

under submission and will thereafter issue its opinion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 21, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01469-AWI -SMS Document 35 Filed 03/22/07 Page 2 of 2