Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-02123/USCOURTS-ca4-16-02123-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2123

KEVIN ROBERTSON,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND,

Creditors – Appellees,

and

MARK J. FRIEDMAN; U.S. TRUSTEE-BALTIMORE, II,

Trustees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:16-cv-01109-JFM; 14-10434)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Ciamporcero Avetta, 

Kavitha Bondada, Bruce R. Ellisen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Michael Joseph Salem, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Annapolis, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Appeal: 16-2123 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-2123 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Robertson appeals the district court’s order 

affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to 

reopen his prior Chapter 7 proceeding. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. United 

States, No. 1:16-cv-01109-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 14, 2016). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-2123 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 3 of 3