Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00709/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00709-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation Extending Time for Board and State of California to Respond to Complaint (2:16-cv-00709-MCE-EFB)

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

MOLLY K. MOSLEY

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

NHAN T. VU, State Bar No. 189508

MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW, State Bar No. 242640

Deputy Attorneys General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (213) 897-2484

Fax: (213) 897-5775

E-mail: Nhan.Vu@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

California Board of Equalization

and State of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALINA BEKKERMAN; BRANDON 

GRIFFITH; JENNY LEE and 

CHARLES LISSER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CALIFORNIA BOARD OF 

EQUALIZATION; STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA; AT&T, INC.; SPRINT 

CORPORATION; T-MOBILE US, 

INC.; VERIZON COMMUNICA- TIONS, INC.; AND DOES 1 TO 20,

INCLUSIVE

Defendants.

2:16-cv-00709-MCE-EFB 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 

FOR DEFENDANTS CALIFORNIA 

BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

PETITION; ORDER THEREON

Trial Date: Not Set

Action Filed: February 5, 2016

Action Removed: April 4, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-00709-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 05/27/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation Extending Time for Board and State of California to Respond to Complaint (2:16-cv-00709-MCE-EFB)

Plaintiffs Alina Bekkerman, Brandon Griffith, Jenny Lee, and Charles Lisser

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants California Board of Equalization and 

State of California (collectively, “State Defendants”), by and through their 

respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows, pursuant to Rule 144 of the Local 

Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(“Local Rules”):

A. Whereas, Plaintiffs served the Complaint and Petition (“Complaint”) 

in this action upon the State Defendants on April 4, 2016;

B. Whereas, Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC, removed this action to 

this Court on April 4, 2016;

C. Whereas, pursuant to Rule 81(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, the State Defendants’ response to the Complaint was initially due on 

April 25, 2016;

D. Whereas, the State Defendants required additional time to prepare 

their response to the Complaint;

E. Whereas, the Plaintiffs and the State Defendants previously stipulated, 

pursuant to Rule 144(a) of the Local Rules, to extend State Defendants’ deadline to 

respond to the Complaint from April 25, 2016 to May 23, 2016;

G. Whereas, the State Defendants continue to require additional time to 

prepare their response to the Complaint;

H. Whereas, the Plaintiffs and Defendants AT&T Mobility LLC, Sprint 

Solutions, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon 

Wireless (collectively, “Carrier Defendants”) have stipulated that the Carrier 

Defendants’ time to respond to the Complaint may be extended to June 6, 2016,

and the Court has approved that stipulation; and

H. Whereas, Plaintiffs have agreed that the State Defendants’ deadline to 

respond to the Complaint may also be extended to June 6, 2016;

/ / /

Case 2:16-cv-00709-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 05/27/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Stipulation Extending Time for Board and State of California to Respond to Complaint (2:16-cv-00709-MCE-EFB)

NOW, THEREFORE, PLAINTIFFS AND THE STATE DEFENDANTS

STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT:

The State Defendants’ deadline to file their response to the Complaint may

be extended from May 23, 2016, to June 6, 2016.

Dated: May 19, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California MOLLY K. MOSLEY

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

By: /s/ Nhan T. Vu

NHAN T. VU

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

California Board of Equalization

and State of California

Dated: May 19, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, 

HATTIS LAW

By: /s/ Daniel M. Hattis (as authorized on

 05/19/16)

DANIEL M. HATTIS

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Alina Bekkerman, 

Brandon Griffith, Jenny Lee, and Charles 

Lisser

SA2016100911

52103774.doc

Case 2:16-cv-00709-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 05/27/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[Proposed] Order (2:16-cv-00709-MCE-EFB)

ORDER

Good cause having been shown pursuant to the Stipulation Extending Time 

for Defendants California Board of Equalization and State of California to Respond 

to Complaint and Petition, the time for the State Defendants to respond to the 

Complaint shall be extended from May 23, 2016 to June 6, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 26, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-00709-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 05/27/16 Page 4 of 4