Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03527/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03527-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD E. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff,

 v.

AMR THE PARENT OF AMERICAN

AIRLINES INC., and DOES 1 through 5,

inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-03527 WHA

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S

CORRECTED OPPOSITION

The Court has been informed that defense counsel called the Court’s deputy clerk to

request an extension to file their reply brief in light of plaintiff’s improper filing of a corrected

opposition. Defendants’ request is DENIED. Defendants reply brief remains due as scheduled

on MAY 23 AT NOON. Any yet further untimely evidence submitted by plaintiff, however, will

not be considered. 

Dated: May 21, 2008. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-03527-WHA Document 43 Filed 05/21/08 Page 1 of 1