Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05469/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05469-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOBBY JONES,

Plaintiff, CV F 03 5469 OWW WMW P 

vs. ORDER RE: FINDINGS & 

 RECOMMENDATIONS (#20)

GAI L LEWIS, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302. 

 On April 25, 2006, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending

dismissal of defendants Lewis, Brewer and Johnson for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff was

provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file objections to

the findings and recommendations. On June 7, 2006, and order suggesting death upon the record

was entered, suggesting the death upon the record of Defendant Klarich, the remaining

defendant. The ninety day period within which to file a response has expired, and Plaintiff has

not filed a response.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

Case 1:03-cv-05469-OWW -WMW Document 25 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

proper analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April

25, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants Lewis, Brewer and Johnson are dismissed for failure to state a

claim upon which relief can be granted. 

3. Defendant Klarich is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 25, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05469-OWW -WMW Document 25 Filed 02/26/07 Page 2 of 2