Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04068/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04068-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH GLASS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-06-4068 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS AND

DEFENDANTS TO LODGE CHAMBERS

COPIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On December 1, 2006, defendants electronically filed a Memorandum Requesting

the Court Allow Lawrence R. Kaufmann to Withdraw His Objections to the Settlement. On

December 1, 2006, plaintiffs electronically filed a Memorandum on Withdrawal of Lawrence

R. Kaufmann’s Motion to Intervene. On December 4, 2006, plaintiffs electronically filed a

Motion to Strike Anthony D’Aria’s Memorandum in Response to the Court’s Request for

Briefing on Lawrence R. Kaufmann’s Request to Withdraw Glass Objections. Plaintiffs and

defendants have violated General Order 45 and the Court’s standing orders, however, by

failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the

day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name,

case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also

Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiffs and defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45

Case 3:06-cv-04068-MMC Document 117 Filed 12/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and the Court’s standing orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of the abovereferenced documents. Plaintiffs and defendants are hereby advised that if they fail in the

future to comply with the Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed

documents, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the

record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely

provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 7, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-04068-MMC Document 117 Filed 12/07/06 Page 2 of 2