Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00025/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00025-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

TRULIA, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-00024-JD 

SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL

TO DETERME CASE RELATIONSHIP 

AND SETTING DATE FOR PARTIES’

CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

JURISDICTION

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the Court refers the above-captioned case, 

Case No. 15-cv-00024-JD, Arunachalam v. Trulia, Inc., as well as Case No. 15-cv-00025-JD, 

Arunachalam v. Trinet, Inc., to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, to determine whether they 

are related to Case No. 15-cv-00023-EDL, Arunachalam v. Fremont Bancorporation.

In the event Magistrate Judge Laporte finds the cases are related, the defendants in the 

Trulia and Trinet cases are ordered to each file a statement indicating their consent or declination 

to Magistrate Judge Laporte’s jurisdiction within one week from the date of her order finding the 

cases are related.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 11, 2015

______________________________________

James Donato

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00025-EDL Document 32 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 1