Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02815/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02815-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MODESTA JACINTO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 16-2815 MMC

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS;

VACATING HEARING

Before the Court is defendants Ditech Financial LLC and Mortgage Electronic

Registration Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss, filed June 1, 2016. On June 28, 2016,

however, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), and defendants have

responded by filing a Motion to Dismiss the FAC.

“[A]n amended pleading supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter

as non-existent.” Bullen v. De Bretteville, 239 F.2d 824, 833 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied,

353 U.S. 947 (1957).

Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES as moot defendant’s motion to dismiss the

initial complaint, and VACATES the July 29, 2016 hearing scheduled thereon.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 18, 2016 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-02815-MMC Document 30 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 1