Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03909/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03909-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTON - 1 - Case No. 4:14-cv-3909-DMR

Deborah E. Fishman (SBN 197584)

Krista M. Carter (SBN 225229)

KAYE SCHOLER LLP

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 400

Palo Alto, CA 94306

Telephone: (650) 319-4500

Facsimile: (650) 319-4700

Email: deborah.fishman@kayescholer.com

Email: krista.carter@kayescholer.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

AAT BIOQUEST, INC.

Rick B. Yeager (Texas SBN 22146500)

10805 Mellow Lane

Austin, TX 78759

Telephone: (512) 779-9525

Email: rveager@teflabs.com

Attorney for Defendant

TEXAS FLUORESENCE

LABORATORIES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

AAT BIOQUEST, INC., a Delaware

corporation

Plaintiff,

v.

TEXAS FLUORESENCE

LABORATORIES, INC.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 4:14-cv-3909-(DMR)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT

INJUNCTION

Judge: Hon. Donna M. Ryu

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, as well as Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, Plaintiff AAT Bioquest, Inc.

(“AAT Bioquest”) and Defendant Texas Fluorescence Laboratories, Inc. (“TEFLabs” or

“Defendant”) jointly submit the following Stipulation and proposed Order for a permanent

injunction against any further infringement by Defendant of AAT Bioquest’s patent rights:

Case 4:14-cv-03909-DMR Document 50 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 3 Case4:14-cv-03909-DMR Document47-1 Filed04/28/15 Page2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTON - 2 - Case No. 4:14-cv-3909-DMR

WHEREAS, this patent infringement action commenced on August 28, 2014 by AAT

Bioquest against TEFLabs involving U.S. Patent No. 8,779,165 (the “’165 Patent”);

WHEREAS, AAT Bioquest is the owner of all right, title, and interest in the ’165 patent;

WHEREAS, AAT Bioquest and TEFLabs filed a Joint Case Management Statement (D.N.

21) on November 26, 2014, wherein the Parties agreed that TEFLabs’ Fluo-2 MA AM product

infringed Claim 1 of the ’165 Patent, and that TEFLabs would be enjoined if that claim were held

valid and enforceable;

WHEREAS, the Court issued an Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

and Denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.N. 46) on April 13, 2015, wherein the

Court denied TEFLabs’ Motions for Summary Judgment regarding invalidity and unenforceability

of the ‘165 Patent, and granted AAT Bioquest’s Motions of Summary Judgment for no invalidity

and no inequitable conduct;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby STIPULATE to this Injunction and IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

a. Subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and venue are all proper in this

Court.

b. Defendant TEFLabs is permanently restrained, enjoined and prohibited from further

infringement of the ’165 Patent, and from manufacturing, using, selling, importing,

and/or offering for sale fluo indicators which have the same structure as the indicator

claimed in Claim 1 of the ’165 Patent in the United States for the life of the ’165

Patent.

c. This injunction applies to TEFLabs, its present or future members, its present or

future managers, and its present or future employees, agents, and contractors, and any

successors-in-interest.

d. Nothing in this injunction shall be construed as granting TEFLabs a license to the

’165 Patent or otherwise permitting TEFLabs to infringe AAT Bioquest’s patent

rights, past, present, or future.

e. This injunction shall expire on January 5, 2029.

Case 4:14-cv-03909-DMR Document 50 Filed 05/01/15 Page 2 of 3 Case4:14-cv-03909-DMR Document47-1 Filed04/28/15 Page3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTON - 3 - Case No. 4:14-cv-3909-DMR

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: April 28, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

KAYE SCHOLER LLP

By: /s/ Krista Carter

Krista M. Carter (SBN 225229)

Attorney for Plaintiff

AAT BIOQUEST, INC.

By: /s/ Rick B. Yeager

Rick B. Yeager (Texas SBN 21146500)

Attorney for Defendant

TEXAS FLUORESENCE LABORATORIES, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDRED.

Dated: ________________________

HON. DONNA M. RYU

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case4:14-cv-03909-DMR Document47-1 Filed04/28/15 Page4 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

May 1, 2015

Case 4:14-cv-03909-DMR Document 50 Filed 05/01/15 Page 3 of 3