Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02154/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02154-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES SANFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEL TACO, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

CIV. S-04-2154 GEB PAN 

ORDER

—NFN—

On May 10, 2005, plaintiff filed a “Notice of Motion and

Motion to Compel Discovery and Determine the Sufficiency of

Defendants’ [O]bjection[s]” to plaintiff’s interrogatories and 

document request, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, 33 and 34. As

oral argument is unnecessary to resolve this matter, the hearing

scheduled for June 15, 2005, is vacated.

The court has reviewed the parties’ stipulation and

separate filings and finds that the meet and confer requirements

of E. D. Cal. L. R. 37-251(b) have not been met.

Case 2:04-cv-02154-GEB-EFB Document 25 Filed 06/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion is denied without

prejudice. Plaintiff may renew the motion after meeting

personally with counsel for defendant to attempt to resolve their

differences. 

So ordered. 

Dated: June 15, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02154-GEB-EFB Document 25 Filed 06/16/05 Page 2 of 2