Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05378/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05378-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PEYTON SHOTWELL,

Plaintiff, CV F 04 5378 REC WMW P

vs. ORDER 

OFFICER STEVENSON, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on the November 9, 2005, second amended

complaint. The court has screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and

finds that it appears to state cognizable claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against

defendants Stevenson and Fergerson. in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Accordingly, it is

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

OFFICER STEVENSON

OFFICER FERGERSON

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff two USM-285 forms, two summonses,

a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

Case 1:04-cv-05378-LJO -WMW Document 24 Filed 12/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

second amended complaint filed November 9, 2005.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to

the court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Three copies of the endorsed second amended complaint filed November

9, 2005. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 8, 2005 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05378-LJO -WMW Document 24 Filed 12/08/05 Page 2 of 2