Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06364/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06364-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN E. FIELDS, CASE NO. CV-F-03-6364 OWW DLB P

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUBPOENAS

[DOC 117]

vs.

WARDEN A. K. SCRIBNER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. On November 9, 2005, the Court issued an order granting in part,

plaintiff’s motions to compel production of documents from defendants. The Court ordered defendants

to produce redacted copies of defendants’ personnel files and maintenance logs for October 2002. The

Court also ordered defendants to produce plaintiff’s central file for inspection. On December 27, 2005,

defendants filed a notice of compliance with the Court’s order. 

On April 17, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court issue subpoenas to the

Warden of Corcoran State Prison for the documents ordered produced. Plaintiff states that defendants

had been “evasive and served incomplete disclosures.” 

On June 7, 2006, defendants filed an opposition to plaintiff’s motion. Defendants represent that

plaintiff was given the opportunity to review his Central File on December 5, 2005 and the documents

Case 1:03-cv-06364-LJO -DLB Document 131 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

ordered produced were served on plaintiff on December 27, 2005.

Plaintiff does not explain how defendants’ responses are evasive or incomplete. In light of

defendants’ representation that they have complied with the Court’s order and produced the requested

documents, plaintiff’s request for subpoenas is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 17, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06364-LJO -DLB Document 131 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2