Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01518/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01518-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

-1- 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

TODD A. NOAH (State Bar No. 152328) 

DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP 

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 705-6377 

Facsimile: (415) 705-6383 

E-mail: tnoah@dergnoah.com 

C. DALE QUISENBERRY (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

POLASEK, QUISENBERRY & ERRINGTON, L.L.P. 

6750 West Loop South, Suite 920 

Bellaire, Texas 77401 

Telephone: (832) 778-6000 

Facsimile: (832) 778-6010 

E-mail: dquisenberry@pqelaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ENNOVA DIRECT, INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

 ENNOVA DIRECT, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

A-DATA TECHNOLOGY (U.S.A.) CO.,LTD., 

KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY 

CORPORATION, PHILIPS ELECTRONICS 

NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, 

PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SONY 

ELECTRONICS, INC., THOMSON INC., 

TRANSCEND INFORMATION INC., and 

VERBATIM AMERICAS LLC, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT 

PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH 

AMERICA 

CORPORATION 

Case3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document218-1 Filed06/21/10 Page1 of 2 Case 3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document 222 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, and as a result of an agreement reached between plaintiff Ennova 

Direct, Inc. (“Ennova”) and defendant Philips Electronics North American Corporation (“Philips”), IT 

IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 

 1. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Ennova and Philips, and over the subject matter 

of this action. 

 2. Each claim made by Ennova against Philips, and each counterclaim made by Philips 

against Ennova, in this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice on the basis of the settlement reached, 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. 

 3. Philips has the right to assert any claims, counterclaims, or defenses, including but not 

limited to patent invalidity and unenforceability, if Ennova asserts U.S. Patent No. 6,979,210 or any 

claims thereof against Philips based on any of its products in the future. 

 4. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

 5. Ennova’s claims against the other defendants in this action shall remain pending. 

 6. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to ensure that the terms and conditions 

of the parties’ settlement agreement are honored and enforced. 

Dated: _______ _____________________________________ 

 JUDGE JOSEPH C. SPERO 

 

Case3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document218-1 Filed06/21/10 Page2 of 2

6/24/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document 222 Filed 06/25/10 Page 2 of 2