Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00046/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00046-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CAUSES OF ACTION OF FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFFS RACHEL DAVID AND MD 

David v. City of Fremont, et al. Case No.: C 05 00046 CW 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GREGORY M. FOX, ESQ., SBN 070876 

DANA L. SOONG, ESQ., SBN 168160 

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

HARVEY E. LEVINE, ESQ., SBN 61880 

MICHAEL BARRETT, ESQ., SBN 155968 

City of Fremont 

3300 Capitol Avenue 

P.O. Box 5006 

Fremont, CA 94537-5006 

Telephone: (510) 284-4030 

Facsimile: (510) 284-4031 

Attorneys for defendant CITY OF FREMONT, 

CRAIG STECKLER, AND MICHAEL CHINN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JENNIFER SAMSON DAVID, by and 

through her attorneys-in-fact ROBERT 

NOVAK and CONSTANT NOVAK, 

individually and in her representative capacity 

as successor in interest to Glenn P. David, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY OF FREMONT, a municipal 

corporation; CRAIG STECKLER, 

individually and in his capacity as Chief of 

Police for the City of Fremont: OFFICER 

MICHAEL CHINN, individually; DOES 1- 

10, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 05 00046 CW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN 

CAUSES OF ACTION OF FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY 

PLAINTIFFS RACHEL DAVID AND MD 

Case 4:05-cv-00046-CW Document 23 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CAUSES OF ACTION OF FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFFS RACHEL DAVID AND MD 

David v. City of Fremont, et al. Case No.: C 05 00046 CW 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RACHEL DAVID; M. D., by and through his

Guardian Ad Litem, LORI ALEMANIA, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY OF FREMONT, a municipal 

corporation; CRAIG STECKLER, in his 

capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF 

FREMONT; MICHAEL CHINN, individually, 

and in his capacity as a police officer for the 

CITY OF FREMONT; and DOES 1-25, 

inclusive, individually and in their capacities 

as police officers for the CITY OF 

FREMONT,

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES plaintiffs Rachel 

David (hereinafter “David”) and M.D., by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Lori Alemania 

(hereinafter “M.D.”), and defendants City of Fremont (hereinafter the “City”), ”), Police Chief 

Craig Steckler in his official capacity (hereinafter “Chief Steckler”) and Officer Michael Chinn 

(hereinafter “Officer Chinn”), by and through their attorneys of record, that pursuant to 

defendants’ FRCP Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss: 

1. Plaintiffs shall dismiss with prejudice all of their Fourth Amendment claims 

against defendants as asserted in the first, second and third causes of action of plaintiffs’ first 

amended complaint; 

2. Plaintiffs shall dismiss with prejudice their fourth cause of action against 

defendants for violation of California Civil Code section 52.1 in its entirety; and

3. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, scheduled for hearing on September 9, 2005 at 

10:00 a.m., shall be taken off calendar. 

Case 4:05-cv-00046-CW Document 23 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CAUSES OF ACTION OF FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFFS RACHEL DAVID AND MD 

David v. City of Fremont, et al. Case No.: C 05 00046 CW 

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: August 23, 2005 /s/ by Benjamin Nisenbaum for John Burris 

 

JOHN BURRIS 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: August 23, 2005 /s/ 

GREGORY M. FOX 

Attorney for Defendants

ORDER

 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

 1. Plaintiffs Rachel David and M.D’s Fourth Amendment claims against defendants 

asserted in the first, second and third causes of action of plaintiffs’ first amended complaint are 

dismissed with prejudice; 

 2. Plaintiffs’ fourth cause of action against defendants for violation of California 

Civil Code section 52.1 is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety; and 

 3. Defendants’ FRCP Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss scheduled for hearing on 

September 9, 2005 at 10:00 a.m., is taken off calendar 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________________________________ 

 Honorable Claudia Wilken 

Judge of the U.S. District Court 

is denied as moot.

8/31/05

/s/ CLAUDIA WILKEN

Case 4:05-cv-00046-CW Document 23 Filed 08/31/05 Page 3 of 3