Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-164/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

SMRH:410051888.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

 Case No. 07-5944 SC 

MDL No. 1917 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

LODGED IN OPPOSITION TO DIRECT 

PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ CLASS 

CERTIFICATION MOTION 

This Document Relates to: 

 ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS 

 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1942 Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 3
-1-

SMRH:410051888.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On September 11, 2013, Defendants Samsung SDI America, Inc.; Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.; 

Samsung SDI (Malaysia) SDN. Bhd.; Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. De C.V.; Samsung SDI Brasil 

Ltda.; Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi 

Displays, Ltd. (n/k/a Japan Display East, Inc.); Hitachi Asia, Ltd.; Hitachi America, Ltd.; and 

Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) jointly lodged the following 

documents: 

1. Defendants’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Direct 

Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (the “Opposition”); 

2. Expert Report of Robert D. Willig (“Willig Report”) and the exhibits thereto; 

3. Declaration of Mona Solouki in Support of Defendants’ Opposition to Direct 

Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (“Solouki Declaration”) and the exhibits 

thereto. 

With respect to these documents, Defendants also filed a joint Administrative Motion to 

Seal Documents pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(c) and (d) (“Motion to Seal”), 

seeking leave to file these documents, or portions thereof, under seal. Each Defendant also filed a 

declaration in support of the Motion to Seal. 

After due consideration of the papers submitted, the Court’s previously entered Protective 

Order, and the Court’s file in this matter, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the Motion to Seal is GRANTED. 

Defendants shall file under seal the following documents: 

(a) The Opposition; 

(b) The Willig Report and exhibits thereto; 

(c) The Solouki Declaration and exhibits thereto. 

The Clerk shall place in the public record the following documents: 

(a) The redacted version of the Opposition as lodged by Defendants on 

September 11, 2013; 

(b) The redacted version of the Willig Report and exhibits, as lodged by 

Defendants

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1942 Filed 09/18/13 Page 2 of 3
-2-

SMRH:410051888.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendants on September 11, 2013; 

(c) The redacted version of the Solouki Declaration and exhibits, as lodged by 

Defendants on September 11, 2013. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: __________, 2013 

Hon. Samuel Conti 

United States District Judge 

Sept. 18

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1942 Filed 09/18/13 Page 3 of 3