Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-00172/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-00172-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

Case No. 16-CV-00172-LHK 

ORDER REQUESTING JOINT RESPONSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JOSE VELASCO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF SALINAS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-CV-00172-LHK 

ORDER REQUESTING JOINT 

RESPONSE

Re: Dkt. No. 15

On April 12, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to stay the instant case pending the 

outcome of criminal charges against Plaintiff Jose Velasco. ECF No. 15. According to the 

parties, the criminal charges arise out of the incident giving rise to the instant case. See id. In the 

interest of managing the Court’s caseload, the Court requests that the parties instead consider 

dismissing the instant case without prejudice, with a tolling agreement as to any claims and 

counterclaims. By April 20, 2016, the parties are ORDERED to file a joint response indicating 

whether the parties are amenable to such a dismissal and, if so, when such a dismissal could be 

filed. This response may be included in the parties’ joint case management statement, which also 

must be filed by April 20, 2016. 

Case 5:16-cv-00172-LHK Document 16 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 16-CV-00172-LHK 

ORDER REQUESTING JOINT RESPONSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2016

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:16-cv-00172-LHK Document 16 Filed 04/14/16 Page 2 of 2