Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01758/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01758-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEE EDWARD PEYTON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PAT L. VASQUEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-01758-OWW-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 8)

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Docs. 7, 11, 14, and 15)

Plaintiff Lee Edward Peyton (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking

relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and

Local Rule 72-302.

On January 26, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. To date,

plaintiff has not filed any objection to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:06-cv-01758-OWW -GSA Document 19 Filed 03/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of

this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the

record and by proper analysis, and it shall be adopted in full.

On February 21, 2007, plaintiff filed another motion seeking

preliminary injunctive relief. For the reasons set forth in detail

in the Findings and Recommendations filed on January 26, 2007, and

the Order filed on February 15, 2007, plaintiff’s motion for relief

concerning his current conditions of confinement at High Desert

State Prison shall be denied. City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461

U.S. 95, 102, 103 S.Ct. 1660, 1665 (1983); Valley Forge Christian

Coll. v. Ams. United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454

U.S. 464, 471, 102 S.Ct. 752, 757-58 (1982); Jones v. City of Los

Angeles, 444 F.3d 1118, 1126 (9th Cir. 2006). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 26, 2007,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief,

filed January 16, 2007, and supplemented on January 29,

2007, is DENIED; and

3. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief,

filed on February 21, 2007, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 20, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01758-OWW -GSA Document 19 Filed 03/21/07 Page 2 of 2