Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07521/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07521-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 MICHELE KENNY,

Plaintiff, No. C 06-07521 (EDL)

v. ORDER RE DISCOVERY MOTIONS 

 REGIS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

There are three motions pending before the Court: (1) Defendant’s Motion for a Protective

Order; (2) Defendant’s Motion for Order Compelling Plaintiff’s Deposition; and (3) Plaintiff’s Motion

to Compel Production of Documents and to Compel Defendants to Proceed with Noticed Depositions.

For the reasons stated at the November 9, 2007 hearing, Defendants’ motion for a protective order is

GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Defendants’ motion to compel Plaintiff’s deposition is

GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in

part as follows:

1) Plaintiff shall appear for deposition on November 14, 2007. Defendants may depose

Plaintiff for up to seven hours as needed (of examination time). Defendants are to conduct this

deposition in good faith and may not unnecessarily prolong the examination, but they may use the full

seven hours if needed. 

2) Defendants’ request for monetary sanctions is DENIED. 

3) The deposition of Defendant’s witness shall go forward as noticed on November 15,

2007. Defendants shall make all good faith efforts to produce their other witness by November 21,

Case 3:06-cv-07521-CRB Document 61 Filed 11/13/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2007. If this proves impossible, Defendants shall produce their witness for deposition no later than

November 30, 2007.

4) Defendants shall produce a copy of the Vicki Langan deposition transcript with exhibits

so that Plaintiff receives it by November 12, 2007.

5) Defendants shall make a maximum good faith effort to produce documents responsive

to Plaintiff’s Document Request No. 38 regarding the bank records before Plaintiff deposes Defendants’

Rule 30(b)(6) witness.

6) Defendants immediately shall produce a declaration in accordance with this Court’s

Standing Order Re Discovery Procedures. Defendants shall state specifically that they have not

withheld any documents responsive to the document requests, or if they have withheld any documents,

they shall state specifically what types of documents have been withheld and on what basis.

Dated: November 13, 2007 _______________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-07521-CRB Document 61 Filed 11/13/07 Page 2 of 2