Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02325/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02325-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY BARGER,

Plaintiff,

v.

DIRECTOR CDCR,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-2325 KJN P

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff Gary Barger, also known as Gary Francis Fisher, is a state prisoner proceeding 

without counsel. By an order filed December 8, 2014, plaintiff was ordered to submit, within 

twenty-one days, the appropriate filing fee in order to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 7, 

citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).) Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-one day period has now expired, and 

plaintiff has not paid the appropriate filing fee or responded to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign 

a district judge to this case; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

Case 2:14-cv-02325-KJM-KJN Document 8 Filed 01/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 8, 2015

/barg2325.fpf

Case 2:14-cv-02325-KJM-KJN Document 8 Filed 01/09/15 Page 2 of 2