Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02130/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02130-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 10cv2130

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

O’M AND ASSOCIATES, LLC, an

Illinois limited liability company, d/b/a

O’Malley and Associates; PRESERVE

CAPITAL, LLC, an Illinois limited

liability company; and MBM

SETTLEMENTS, LLC, an Illinois limited

liability company,

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 10-CV-2130 H (RBB)

ORDER DENYING

DEFENDANT MATTHEW

STOEN’S MOTION TO

DISMISS WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

[Doc. No. 104]

vs.

BRENDAN K. OZANNE, BRIAN C.

DAWSON, AND DAWSON &

OZANNE, a California general

partnership, as escrow agent; MATTHEW

STOEN, individually and as manager and

agent for KODIAK FAMILY, LLC, a

Nevada limited liability company;

KODIAK FAMILY, LLC, individually

and as agent for XYZ CORPORATION,

Defendants.

On January 31, 2011, Defendant Matthew Stoen (“Stoen”) filed a motion to dismiss

Counts I, III, IV, V, VI, VIII, and IX of Plaintiffs’ complaint. (Doc. No. 104.) On February

23, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend complaint in lieu of response to the

motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 23.) On February 25, 2011, the Court, recognizing that leave

to amend is freely granted, issued a tentative order stating it was inclined to grant the motion

Case 3:10-cv-02130-AJB-MDD Document 123 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 10cv2130

for leave to amend the complaint, which would render Defendant Stoen’s motion to dismiss

as moot. (Doc. No. 113.) The Court directed Defendants to file any opposition to the tentative

order by March 4, 2011. (Id.) Defendants did not file any opposition. On March 8, 2011, the

Court adopted its tentative order and granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the

complaint. (Doc. No. 121.) In light of granting leave to file an amended complaint, the Court

DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant Stoen’s motion to dismiss the original

complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2011

________________________________

MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:10-cv-02130-AJB-MDD Document 123 Filed 03/15/11 Page 2 of 2