Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_18-cv-00793/USCOURTS-ared-4_18-cv-00793-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

CENTRAL DIVISION 

STRATHCLYDE PENSION FUND, 

Lead Plaintiff 

v. No. 4:18-cv-793-DPM 

BANKOZKand 

PLAINTIFF 

GEORGE GLEASON DEFENDANTS 

ORDER 

The Court has received the revised draft protective order and 

agreement. Please make the attached changes, insert the date of 

counsel's approval, and send the final to chambers for entry. The Court 

declines to have two rounds of briefing on sealing issues. The parties 

must make their best arguments the first time around. As with any 

motion, if the Court needs additional information, it will request it. 

So Ordered. 

D.P. Marshall Jr. 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:18-cv-00793-DPM Document 64 Filed 09/17/20 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

STRATHCLYDE PENSION FUND, 

Individually and on Behalf of All Others 

Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BANK OZK, et al., 

Defendants. 

) No. 4:18-cv-00793-DPM 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CLASS ACTION 

~TIPULA TED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case 4:18-cv-00793-DPM Document 64 Filed 09/17/20 Page 2 of 3
privilege. For any Discovery Material used for the first time in the summary judgment 

motions, where the Receiving Party had no notice that the Discovery Material was subject 

to a claim of attorney client privilege or work product protection, then the Producing Party 

has 45 days from the filing of the reply brief in support of summary judgment to assert that 

the attorney client privilege or work product protection should have applied to the 

Discovery Material. Thereafter, the producing party must meet the requirements of Federal 

Rule of Evidence 502(b) in order to protect the privilege. 

XII. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL 

Information designated as "Confidential" must not be filed on the public docket. If 

practicable, it should be redacted. Fed. R Civ. P. 5.2. If an entire page contains 

information designated as "Confidential," substituting a page marked "Redacted" is an 

acceptable redaction method. If redaction is impracticable, a party must move for 

permission to file any information designated as "Confidential" and a related motion, brief, 

or paper, containing that material under seal. The moving party must justify sealing with 

specific and solid reasons, including an explanation about why redaction cannot be done. 

-1.f the material req1:1ested to be filed ttndet seal was designated ~onfidential by the nool----' 

mtttting party and the Court has a eoncem regarding the confidentiality dcsigntttion---ttft«:_ ✓ 

the mo· ing party h88-provided its justification for filing ondet seal, the Court will infortfL_ 

the pa.Fties of its concern and allow the designating party to provide fuffherjustifieation fee_,. 

w~hc document is eonfidenttal and should be filed under scfr? 

XIII. RIGHT TO FURTHER RELIEF 

Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by 

the Court in the future. 

- 15 -

Case 4:18-cv-00793-DPM Document 64 Filed 09/17/20 Page 3 of 3