Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02834/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02834-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVIN SHADD, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:12-cv-02834-MCE-KJN

ORDER

On February 27, 2014, this Court granted in part and denied in part with leave to 

amend Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 59. Order, Feb. 27, 2014, ECF No. 67. 

Plaintiffs were given one final opportunity to file an amended consolidated Complaint 

and were instructed that the failure to timely file a Fourth Amended Complaint would 

result, without further notice to the parties, in the dismissal of certain parties and claims 

with prejudice. See id. Plaintiffs failed to file an amended Complaint within the time 

permitted. Therefore, the parties and causes of actions dismissed in that Order are 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

Those Defendants who have not yet responded to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended 

Complaint, ECF No. 55, are ordered to do so within fourteen (14) days of the electronic 

filing of this Order. In addition, within thirty (30) days of the electronic filing of this Order, 

all parties are ordered to prepare and submit to the Court one consolidated joint status 

Case 2:12-cv-02834-MCE-KJN Document 68 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

report that includes a Rule 26(f) discovery plan, as well as the other information required 

by this Court’s November 20, 2012 Order Requiring Joint Status Report. See ECF No. 5 

at 2-3.1 Upon receipt of that status report, the Court will issue a Pretrial Scheduling 

Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 25, 2014

 1 As the parties are well aware, four separate actions (Ford, Costa, Fields, and Shadd) have been 

consolidated for pretrial purposes. See Order, ECF No. 28. The parties were directed that all pretrial 

documents for the four matters are to be filed on the Shadd docket. Id. Thus, the parties are directed to 

file a single consolidated status report encompassing all four actions. However, to the extent that any 

information provided in the status report does not pertain to all four cases, the parties must clearly indicate

to which action it pertains, including, but not limited to, the parties’ Rule 26(f) discovery plan and proposed 

dates for final pretrial conferences and trials.

Case 2:12-cv-02834-MCE-KJN Document 68 Filed 03/26/14 Page 2 of 2