Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01954/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01954-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (#88625)

NORA FRIMANN, Chief Trial Attorney (#93249)

ROBERT FABELA, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (#148098)

DAVID ROLLO, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (#111998)

Office of the City Attorney

200 East Santa Clara Street 

San Jose, California 95113 

Telephone Number: (408) 535-1900 

Facsimile Number: (408) 998-3131 

Attorneys for CITY OF SAN JOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF SAN JOSE, 

 Defendant. 

Case Number: C 04-01954 JW

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL 

DISCOVERY RESPONSES 

The parties to the above-entitled action hereby stipulate as follows; 

(1) The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses currently

scheduled for hearing on September 6, 2005, shall be continued to September 13, 2005, at 

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2 of this Court; 

(2) Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(a), the City’s opposition papers must be filed and 

served no later than August 23, 2005; 

(3) Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(c), Plaintiff’s reply brief must be filed and served 

no later than August 29, 2005; 

/// 

/// 

/// 

– 1 – 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY C 04-01954JW

RESPONSES 319436

Case 5:04-cv-01954-JW Document 24 Filed 08/15/05 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(4) The City will not object to a continuance of the discovery cut-off (currently set 

for September 30, 2005) should the continuance in the motion to compel hearing require 

discovery to be conducted beyond the discovery cut-off.

Dated: August ___, 2005 

EQUAL EMPLOYEMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION

By: ______________________________ MARCIA MITCHELL

Attorney for Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 

Dated: August 12, 2005 

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY

By: ___/s/ Robert Fabela_________________ ROBERT FABELA 

Sr. Deputy City Attorney

Attorney for Defendant 

City of San Jose 

I attest that Plaintiff’s counsel has approved this document telephonically and given 

consent to the filing of the same with the court. 

Dated: August 12, 2005 

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY

By: ___/s/ Robert Fabela_______________ ROBERT FABELA 

Sr. Deputy City Attorney

Attorney for Defendant 

City of San Jose 

– 2 – 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY C 04-01954JW

RESPONSES 319436

Case 5:04-cv-01954-JW Document 24 Filed 08/15/05 Page 2 of 3
– 3 – 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY C 04-01954JW

RESPONSES 319436

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER

 The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties now orders as follows: 

(1) The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses currently 

scheduled for hearing on September 6, 2005, shall be continued to September 13, 2005, at 

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2 of this Court; 

(2) Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(a), the City’s opposition papers must be filed and 

served no later than August 23, 2005; 

(3) Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(c), Plaintiff’s reply brief must be filed and served 

no later than August 29, 2005. 

Dated: August __, 2005 __________________________________ 

HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD 

United State District Court Magistrate Judge 

Case 5:04-cv-01954-JW Document 24 Filed 08/15/05 Page 3 of 3