Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01586/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01586-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 423
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157
Cause of Action: 28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE MATTER OF:

TFS Electronic Manufacturing Services,

Inc., 

Debtor. 

TFS Electronic Manufacturing Services,

Inc., 

Plaintiff,

vs. 

Topsearch Printed Circuits (HK), Ltd. and

Avocent Corporation, 

Defendants. _________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-1586-PHX-SMM

BK-05-15403-PHX-RTV

ADV. No. 06-307

ORDER

Pending before the Court is non-party Duy Nguyen’s (“Nguyen”) Motion to Quash

Subpoena (the “Subpoena”). The Subpoena was served on January 25, 2007, and schedules

Nguyen’s deposition “on March 8, 2007 . . . in San Jose, California.” (Dkt. 50 at 1, Ex. A.)

Nguyen seeks to have this Court quash the Subpoena served by TFS Electronic

Manufacturing Services, Inc., on the grounds that he will be in Shenzhen, China on March

8, 2007, and thus the Subpoena requires unreasonable travel in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P.

45(c)(3)(A)(ii). (Dkt. 50 at 3.)

Case 2:06-cv-01586-SMM Document 51 Filed 03/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Controversies regarding depositions of non-parties are generally decided in the Court

which issued the Subpoena. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(c)(3)(A) (“On timely motion, the court by

which a subpoena was issued shall quash or modify the subpoena if it . . . (ii) requires a

person who is not a party or an officer of a party to travel to a place more than 100 miles

from the place where that person resides, is employed or regularly transacts business in

person. . . . ”). The Subpoena was issued by the United States District Court for the Northern

District of California. See Dkt. 50, Ex. A. Therefore, this Court denies Nguyen’s Motion

to Quash Subpoena.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING Duy Nguyen’s Motion to Quash Subpoena.

(Dkt. 50.)

DATED this 5th day of March, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-01586-SMM Document 51 Filed 03/06/07 Page 2 of 2