Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alsd-1_05-cv-00490/USCOURTS-alsd-1_05-cv-00490-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation

---

1

 The court dismissed Sledge and Wheatley as defendants because they were not properly

served. (Doc. 54). The court also found that plaintiff has failed to state a claim for which relief

can be granted for (1) violation of the 1st Amendment, (2) conspiracy, (3) wrongful termination,

and (4) slander. (Doc. 54). 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PATRICK HENRY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-0490-CG-C

)

ARAMARK CORP., )

)

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for “a speedy ruling on complaint.” 

(Doc. 78). Plaintiff seeks a ruling on the claims asserted in his complaint and argues that

Aramark Corp. is the proper defendant. However, summary judgment was previously granted in

favor of defendant. (Doc. 67). This court found that plaintiff’s age discrimination claim failed

because plaintiff had failed to satisfy the administrative prerequisites to suit. (Doc. 67). 

Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend judgment was also denied by this court. (Doc. 72). Prior to

the summary judgment ruling, all of plaintiff’s other claims were dismissed from the case.1 As

such, this case is now closed. The complaint has been ruled on and been found to be lacking as a

matter of law. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion for speedy ruling on the complaint is MOOT.

DONE and ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2007. 

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00490-CG-C Document 79 Filed 07/18/07 Page 1 of 1