Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04435/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04435-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER, CASE NO. C 06-04435 CRB 

3018048_4.DOC 

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838 

STEVEN D. GUGGENHEIM, State Bar No. 201386 

CAZ HASHEMI, State Bar No. 210239 

CAMERON P. HOFFMAN, State Bar No. 229316 

MARK T. OAKES, State Bar No. 234598 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Email: moakes@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Third Party 

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GREGORY L. REYES, STEPHANIE JENSEN 

and ANTONIO CANOVA, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C 06-04435 CRB 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED 

CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER 

AS AMENDED

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 70 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER, CASE NO. C 06-04435 CRB 

-1- 3018048_4.DOC 

In order to protect the confidentiality of confidential information subpoenaed by 

defendant Gregory L. Reyes in this case, third party Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 

(“Brocade”) and defendant Gregory L. Reyes hereby agree as follows: 

1. Brocade may designate as “confidential” (by stamping the relevant page or as 

otherwise set forth herein) any document or response to a subpoena which it considers in good 

faith to: (i) contain information involving trade secrets, or confidential business or financial 

information, subject to protection under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or California law; 

or (ii) contain confidential information of a person that is protected by a right of privacy under 

applicable law. Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and 

each page on which confidential information appears shall be so designated. 

2. Brocade may designate information disclosed during a deposition as 

“confidential” by so indicating on the record at the deposition and requesting the preparation of a 

separate transcript of such material. Additionally, Brocade may designate in writing, within 

twenty (20) days after receipt of the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, 

that specific pages of the transcript be treated as "confidential" information. Any party may 

object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the procedures 

described in paragraph 7 below shall be followed. After any designation made according to the 

procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be treated 

according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures described in 

paragraph 7 below. 

3. All information produced by third party Brocade to defendant Gregory L. Reyes 

in the course of this case (other than information that is publicly available) shall be used solely 

for the purpose of this case and any related criminal or civil proceedings currently pending. 

4. Except with the prior written consent of Brocade, or upon prior order of this Court 

obtained upon notice to Brocade, anything designated as confidential pursuant to the terms of 

this Order (“Confidential Information”) shall not be disclosed to any person other than: 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 70 Filed 01/11/07 Page 2 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER, CASE NO. C 06-04435 CRB 

-2- 3018048_4.DOC 

(a) counsel for the respective parties to this litigation who have agreed to be 

bound by the terms of this Order, including defendants’ counsel and 

counsel for the Securities and Exchange Commission; 

(b) employees of such counsel; 

(c) individual defendants, to the extent deemed necessary by counsel for the 

prosecution or defense of this litigation; 

(d) consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of 

this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the 

Certification annexed to this Order (which shall be retained by counsel to 

the party so disclosing the Confidential Information and made available 

for inspection during the pendency or after the termination of the action 

upon good cause shown and upon order of the Court) before being shown 

or given any Confidential Information and provided that if the party 

chooses a consultant or expert employed by one of Brocade 

Communications Systems, Inc’s competitors or customers, the party shall 

notify Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. before disclosing any 

Confidential Information to that individual and shall give Brocade 

Communications Systems, Inc. an opportunity to move for a protective 

order preventing or limiting such disclosure; 

(e) any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information; 

(f) the Court, Court personnel and court reporters; and 

(g) witnesses, at deposition and/or trial, only to the extent necessary to give 

their testimony. At the request of any party, the portion of the transcript 

involving the Confidential Information shall be designated "Confidential" 

pursuant to paragraph 2 above. Witnesses shown Confidential 

Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 70 Filed 01/11/07 Page 3 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER, CASE NO. C 06-04435 CRB 

-3- 3018048_4.DOC 

5. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such 

information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set 

forth herein. 

6. For applications and motions to the Court on which a party submits Confidential 

Information, all documents and chamber copies containing Confidential Information which are 

submitted to the Court shall be filed with the Court in sealed envelopes or other appropriate 

sealed containers. On the outside of the envelopes, a copy of the first page of the document shall 

be attached. If Confidential Information is included in the first page attached to the outside of 

the envelopes, it may be deleted from the outside copy. The word “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be 

stamped on the envelope and a statement substantially in the following form shall also be printed 

on the envelope: 

This envelope is sealed pursuant to order of the Court, contains 

Confidential Information and is not to be opened or the contents 

revealed, except by Order of the Court or agreement by the parties. 

In the event that the Clerk’s Office refuses to accept a document filed under seal, the 

filing party shall, not later than the next business day, file a notice indicating which documents 

the party attempted to file. The filing party shall also serve a copy of the rejected filing by 

overnight mail on Brocade. If Brocade wishes to contest the public filing of the document it 

must file a motion to that effect within five (5) business days of the initial filing date. If no 

motion is received, the filing party may file the document publicly within seven (7) business 

days of the initial filing. If a motion is filed to permit the filing to be made under seal, the filing 

party may not file the document with the confidential material included therein until the motion 

is resolved. This procedure shall not affect any Court order or other rule regarding the 

scheduling for future filings. 

7. If a party contends that any material is not entitled to confidential treatment, such 

party may at any time give written notice to Brocade. Brocade shall have twenty-five (25) days 

from the receipt of such written notice to apply to the Court for an order designating the material 

as confidential. 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 70 Filed 01/11/07 Page 4 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER, CASE NO. C 06-04435 CRB 

-4- 3018048_4.DOC 

8. Notwithstanding any challenge to the designation of material as Confidential 

Information, all documents designated as confidential shall be treated as such and shall be 

subject to the provisions hereof unless and until one of the following occurs: 

(a) Brocade withdraws such designation in writing; or 

(b) Brocade fails to apply to the Court for an order designating the material 

confidential within the time period specified above after receipt of a 

written challenge to such designation; or 

(c) the Court rules the material is not Confidential Information. 

9. All provisions of this Order restricting the communication or use of Confidential 

Information shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of this action, unless otherwise 

agreed or ordered. Upon conclusion of the litigation, a party in the possession of Confidential 

Information, other than that which is contained in pleadings, correspondence and transcripts, 

shall either (a) return such documents to counsel for the party or non-party who provided such 

information no later than thirty (30) days after a request by such counsel, or (b) destroy such 

documents within ninety (90) days following the conclusion of this action and all appeals and 

certify in writing within thirty (30) days following destruction that the documents have been 

destroyed. 

10. If confidential information is inadvertently produced without marking it as such, it 

may be disclosed to others until the receiving party becomes aware of the error. As soon as the 

receiving party becomes aware of the inadvertent production, the information must be treated as 

though it had been timely designated under this Confidentiality Order, and the receiving party 

must endeavor in good faith to obtain all copies of the documents that it distributed or disclosed 

to persons not authorized by Paragraphs 4 herein, as well as any copies made by such persons. 

11. Nothing herein shall be deemed to waive any applicable privilege or work product 

protection, or to affect the ability of a party to seek relief for an inadvertent disclosure of material 

protected by privilege or work product protection. 

12. This Order shall not apply to or affect the use of information already in the 

possession of a party or obtained by a party outside the course of discovery in this litigation. 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 70 Filed 01/11/07 Page 5 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER, CASE NO. C 06-04435 CRB 

-5- 3018048_4.DOC 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: January 10, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Caz Hashemi 

Caz Hashemi 

Attorneys for Third Party 

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 

Dated: January 10, 2007 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & 

FLOM LLP 

300 South Grand, Suite 3400 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 687-5000 

Facsimile: (213) 687-5600 

By: /s/ Jack DiCanio 

 Jack DiCanio 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Gregory L. Reyes 

THE FOREGOING STIPULATION 

IS APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________, 2007 ________________________________________ 

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Judge

January 11

Provided that all request to file any materiall under seal comports with 

Local Rule 79-5.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 70 Filed 01/11/07 Page 6 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER, CASE NO. C 06-04435 CRB 

-6- 3018048_4.DOC 

APPENDIX A

CERTIFICATION

 I hereby certify my understanding that Confidential Information is being provided to me 

pursuant to the terms and restrictions of the Confidentiality Stipulation and Order dated 

_______________________ in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gregory L. Reyes, 

Stephanie Jensen and Antonio Canova, Case No. C 06-04435 CRB (N.D. Cal.). I have been 

given a copy of that Order and read it. I agree to be bound by the Order. I will not reveal the 

Confidential Information to anyone, except as allowed by the Order. I will maintain all such 

Confidential Information -- including copies, notes or other transcriptions made therefrom -- in a 

secure manner to prevent unauthorized access to it. No later than thirty (30) days after the 

conclusion of this action, I will return the Confidential Information -- including copies, notes or 

other transcriptions made therefrom -- to the counsel who provided me with the Confidential 

Information. I hereby consent to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the Confidentiality Order. 

SIGNATURE: 

DATED: 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 70 Filed 01/11/07 Page 7 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER, CASE NO. C 06-04435 CRB 

-7- 3018048_4.DOC 

I, Mark T. Oakes, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file this [PROPOSED] STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. In compliance with 

General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Jack DiCanio has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: January 10, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Mark T. Oakes 

Mark T. Oakes 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 70 Filed 01/11/07 Page 8 of 8