Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-05325/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-05325-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

1

Case No.: 5:12-cv-05325-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JESUS CORTES DIAZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DAWS MANUFACTURING COMPANY 

INC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:12-cv-05325-EJD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On October 25, 2016, the court issued an order requiring the parties to meet and confer in 

order to reach an agreement on an ADR process and file, within 10 days, either (1) a stipulation 

embodying their agreement, or (2) the form entitled “Notice of Need of ADR Phone Conference.” 

Dkt. No. 90. As of the date and time this was order was filed, the parties have not complied and 

the time for compliance has expired.

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to appear before the Honorable Edward J. Davila on 

December 15, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 4, 5th Floor, United States District Court, 

280 S. First Street, San Jose, California, 95113, to show cause why the court should not impose 

any and all appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of this action, on 

the parties, or any of them, for willful disobedience of a court order.

The parties may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions 

should not be imposed on or before December 8, 2016. In doing so, however, they must (1)

Case 5:12-cv-05325-EJD Document 91 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:12-cv-05325-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

explain their failure to comply with the original deadline to file one of the ADR forms, and (2) 

must also file one of the forms contemplated by the August 15th Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 18, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:12-cv-05325-EJD Document 91 Filed 11/18/16 Page 2 of 2