Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06893/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06893-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

ORANGE COUNTY

 OC\856335.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

Perry J. Viscounty (Bar No. 132143) (petition for 

admission to be filed) 

Jordan B. Kushner (Bar No. 229477) 

650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor 

Costa Mesa, California 92626-1925 

Telephone: (714) 540-1235 

Facsimile: (714) 755-8290 

Email: jordan.kushner@lw.com

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

Jim Day (Bar No. 197158) 

505 Montgomery St., Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111-2562 

Telephone: (415) 391-0600 

Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 

Email: jim.day@lw.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

CUSTOM HOUSE HOTEL, L.P. dba PORTOLA 

PLAZA HOTEL; CUSTOM HOUSE, INC. and 

CDT INVESTMENTS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WOODSIDE HOTELS AND RESORTS 

GROUP SERVICES CORPORATION and 

MONTEREY PLAZA HOTEL, L.P., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CUSTOM HOUSE HOTEL, L.P. doing 

business as PORTOLA PLAZA HOTEL; 

CUSTOM HOUSE, INC., and CDT 

INVESTMENTS, INC., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 06-06893 WHA 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

Case 3:06-cv-06893-WHA Document 11 Filed 11/25/2006 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:06-cv-06893-WHA Document 12 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

ORANGE COUNTY

 OC\856335.1 

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, plaintiffs Woodside Hotels and Resorts Group Services Corporation, 

et al. (“Plaintiffs”) filed their Complaint for False Advertising and Trademark Infringement; 

Unfair Competition; Trademark Dilution; and Unjust Enrichment (“Complaint”) on November 3, 

2006;

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2006, counsel for defendants Custom House Hotel, 

L.P., et al. (“Defendants”) agreed to accept service on behalf of all Defendants; 

WHEREAS, the current date by which Defendants must respond to the Compliant 

is November 29, 2006; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants will be preparing for and in trial during the 

final weeks of November 2006, including November 29; and 

WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs have agreed to an extension of time for the Defendants 

to respond to the Complaint up to and including December 13, 2006. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their attorneys of record, hereby 

stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that Defendants’ deadline to answer or otherwise 

respond to the Complaint be extended fourteen (14) days to December 13, 2006. 

ATTESTATION OF FILER CONCERNING SIGNATURE 

In accordance with general Order No. 45, Section X, the filer of this document 

hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the 

signatories listed below. 

Dated: November 22, 2006 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

By /s/ 

Jordan B. Kushner 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CUSTOM HOUSE HOTEL, L.P., dba 

PORTOLA PLAZA HOTEL; CUSTOM 

HOUSE, INC.; and CDT INVESTMENTS, 

INC.

Case 3:06-cv-06893-WHA Document 11 Filed 11/25/2006 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:06-cv-06893-WHA Document 12 Filed 11/27/06 Page 2 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

ORANGE COUNTY

 OC\856335.1 

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: November 22, 2006 HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI 

CANADY FALK & RABKIN 

By /s/ 

Jeffrey E. Faucette 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

WOODSIDE HOTELS AND RESORTS 

GROUP SERVICES CORPORATION and 

MONTEREY PLAZA HOTEL, L.P. 

ORDER

 Pursuant to stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Defendants’ deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to December 13, 

2006.

Dated:

Hon. William H. Alsup 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-06893-WHA Document 11 Filed 11/25/2006 Page 3 of 4

November 27, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:06-cv-06893-WHA Document 12 Filed 11/27/06 Page 3 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

ORANGE COUNTY

 OC\856335.1 

4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 

18 years and not a party to this action. My business address is Latham & Watkins LLP, 650 

Town Center Drive, 20th Floor, Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1925. 

On November 22, 2006, I served the following document described as: 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

by serving a true copy of the above-described document in the following manner: 

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL 

I am familiar with the office practice of Latham & Watkins LLP for collecting 

and processing documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Under that practice, 

documents are deposited with the Latham & Watkins LLP personnel responsible for depositing 

documents with the United States Postal Service; such documents are delivered to the United 

States Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business, with postage thereon 

fully prepaid. I deposited in Latham & Watkins LLP’ interoffice mail a sealed envelope or 

package containing the above-described document and addressed as set forth below in 

accordance with the office practice of Latham & Watkins LLP for collecting and processing 

documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service: 

Jeffrey E. Faucette 

HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKIN 

Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of, or permitted 

to practice before, this Court at whose direction the service was made and declare under penalty 

of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on November 22, 2006, at Costa Mesa, California. 

 /s/ 

Jordan B. Kushner 

Case 3:06-cv-06893-WHA Document 11 Filed 11/25/2006 Page 4 of 4 Case 3:06-cv-06893-WHA Document 12 Filed 11/27/06 Page 4 of 4