Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00328/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00328-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:185 Employee Pension Plan

---

-1- 

 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT OF DATES FOR ADR PROCESS SELECTION, INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

 AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [CASE NO. C-06-0328 WDB] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

James P. Watson (SBN 046127) 

Bruce K. Leigh (SBN 129753) 

Anne Bevington (SBN 111320) 

STANTON, KAY & WATSON, LLP 

101 New Montgomery, Fifth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 512-3501 

Facsimile: (415) 512-3515 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 JOSE MORENO as CHAIRMAN and LARRY 

 TOTTEN as CO-CHAIRMAN of the BOARD OF 

 TRUSTEES FOR THE LABORERS HEALTH 

 AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR 

 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; LABORERS 

 VACATION-HOLIDAY TRUST FUND FOR 

 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; LABORERS 

 PENSION TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN 

 CALIFORNIA; and LABORERS TRAINING AND 

 RETRAINING TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN 

 CALIFORNIA, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

CRUTCHFIELD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., 

a California corporation; and HAROLD D. 

CRUTCHFIELD, an individual, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: C-06-0328 WDB

 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR 

 POSTPONEMENT OF DATES FOR ADR 

 PROCESS SELECTION, INITIAL 

 DISCLOSURES AND CASE 

 MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

 ORDER 

 Now come the plaintiffs, hereinabove named, and request that the court postpone the dates 

herein for ADR process selection, initial disclosures and case management conference for 

approximately 45 days. 

 The reason for the postponement is that, through inadvertence, plaintiffs served the wrong 

party as individual corporate representative; an Amended Complaint has been filed identifying the 

correct corporate representative and the Summons and Amended Complaint were only served on 

March 17, 2006. 

Case 4:06-cv-00328-WDB Document 9 Filed 03/23/2006 Page 1 of 5
 Case 3:06-cv-00328-JSW Document 10 Filed 03/24/06 Page 1 of 5
 -2- 

 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT OF DATES FOR ADR PROCESS SELECTION, INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

 AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [CASE NO. C-06-0328 WDB] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Plaintiffs recommend that the court reschedule the applicable dates as follows: 

Date Event Proposed Date 

3/28/2006 

4/11/2006 

4/18/2006 

Last day to: 

• Meet and confer re: initial disclosures, 

early settlement, ADR process 

selection, and discovery plan 

• File Joint ADR Certification with 

Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice 

of Need for ADR Phone Conference 

Last day to complete initial disclosures or state 

objection in Rule 26(f) Report, file Case 

Management Statement and file/serve Rule 

26(f) Report 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

(CMC) in Courtroom 4, Oakland at 4:00 p.m. 

5/11/2006 

5/25/2006 

6/1/2006 

 WHEREFORE, plaintiffs pray that the case schedule be modified as indicated above. 

DATED: March 23, 2006 STANTON, KAY & WATSON, LLP 

 By /s/ James P. Watson

JAMES P. WATSON 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 4:06-cv-00328-WDB Document 9 Filed 03/23/2006 Page 2 of 5
 Case 3:06-cv-00328-JSW Document 10 Filed 03/24/06 Page 2 of 5
 -3- 

 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT OF DATES FOR ADR PROCESS SELECTION, INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

 AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [CASE NO. C-06-0328 WDB] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER 

 Upon application of plaintiffs, it is hereby ORDERED that the following case schedule dates 

are modified: 

Date Event New Date 

3/28/2006 

4/11/2006 

4/18/2006 

Last day to: 

• Meet and confer re: initial disclosures, 

early settlement, ADR process 

selection, and discovery plan 

• File Joint ADR Certification with 

Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice 

of Need for ADR Phone Conference 

Last day to complete initial disclosures or state 

objection in Rule 26(f) Report, file Case 

Management Statement and file/serve Rule 

26(f) Report 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

(CMC) in Courtroom 4, Oakland at 4:00 p.m. 

5/11/2006 

5/25/2006 

6/1/2006 

 Plaintiffs’ counsel is directed to serve a copy of this Order on all defendants or defendants’ 

counsel. 

DATED: ___________________ _______________________________ 

 Hon. Wayne D. Brazil 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

F:\CASES\7000\7000.1048 Crutchfield\PLEADINGS\Request for Postponement.doc 

Case 4:06-cv-00328-WDB Document 9 Filed 03/23/2006 Page 3 of 5

3/23/06 

Case 3:06-cv-00328-JSW Document 10 Filed 03/24/06 Page 3 of 5
 -4- 

 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT OF DATES FOR ADR PROCESS SELECTION, INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

 AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [CASE NO. C-06-0328 WDB] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE

CASE NAME: Jose Moreno; et al. v. Crutchfield Construction Co., Inc.; et al. 

CASE NUMBER: United States District Court, Northern District of California 

 No. C-06-0328 WDB

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California. I am over the age 

of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 101 New Montgomery Street, Fifth 

Floor, San Francisco, California 94105. 

On March 23, 2006, I served the following document(s) described as: 

 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT OF DATES FOR ADR 

 PROCESS SELECTION, INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND CASE MANAGEMENT 

 CONFERENCE 

on the following party/parties: 

Crutchfield Construction Co., Inc. 

2655 East Miner Avenue, Suite A 

Stockton, CA 95205 

Harold D. Crutchfield 

2655 East Miner Avenue, Suite A 

Stockton, CA 95205 

 X (BY MAIL) with postage thereon fully prepaid in the designated area for 

outgoing mail. I am readily familiar with STANTON, KAY & WATSON’s 

practice of collection and processing correspondence whereby mail is sealed, 

given the appropriate postage and placed in a designated mail collection area. 

Each day’s mail is collected and deposited with the United States Postal Service 

after the close of each day’s business. I am aware that on motion of the party 

served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter 

date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 

 (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) 

 By personally delivering copies to the person served. 

 I delivered such envelope by hand to the offices of the addressee pursuant to 

C.C.P. §1011. 

 I caused such envelope to be delivered by hand to the office of the addressee. 

 (BY FACSIMILE) AND U.S. MAIL 

 on the party(ies) named below in this action by sending via facsimile to the 

telephone facsimile number shown below, a true copy thereof following ordinary 

business practices. After transmission of the document, the facsimile machine 

indicated the document as having been sent complete and without error. The 

transmission report was properly issued by the transmitting machine and the 

original transmission report is attached to the original proof of service.

Case 4:06-cv-00328-WDB Document 9 Filed 03/23/2006 Page 4 of 5
 Case 3:06-cv-00328-JSW Document 10 Filed 03/24/06 Page 4 of 5
 -5- 

 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT OF DATES FOR ADR PROCESS SELECTION, INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

 AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [CASE NO. C-06-0328 WDB] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 (COURIER SERVICE) 

 by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope, with delivery fees 

provided for, for pick up at this office and overnight delivery by Golden State 

Overnight courier service. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

above is true and correct and that this Declaration is executed on March 23, 2006 at San Francisco, 

California. 

 /s/ Carol M. Christensen

 Carol M. Christensen 

Case 4:06-cv-00328-WDB Document 9 Filed 03/23/2006 Page 5 of 5
 Case 3:06-cv-00328-JSW Document 10 Filed 03/24/06 Page 5 of 5