Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02135/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02135-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID EMERSON SLAUGHTER,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-2135 MCE KJM P

vs.

D.K. SISTO, Warden,

Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed October 22, 2007, petitioner was ordered to file a request to

proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure

to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period

has now expired, and petitioner has not filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the

filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that 

/////

Case 2:07-cv-02135-MCE -KJM Document 7 Filed 01/11/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 10, 2008. 

1

slau2135.fifp

Case 2:07-cv-02135-MCE -KJM Document 7 Filed 01/11/08 Page 2 of 2