Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-06196/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-06196-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BILL LIETZKE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF MONTGOMERY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:18-cv-06196-WHO 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Re: Dkt. Nos. 12, 13

On February 20, 2019, I ordered plaintiff Bill Lietzke to show cause why this case should 

not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 13. On February 27, Lietzke mailed a profane 

letter that failed to respond to my Order or otherwise establish jurisdiction over his claims. See 

Dkt. No. 14. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling it in a 

court that has jurisdiction over these defendants and these claims. Lietzke’s motion to proceed in 

forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. See Dkt. No. 12. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 8, 2019 

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

Case 3:18-cv-06196-WHO Document 16 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 1