Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171-49/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE EXPERT DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P. 

WILLEM G. SCHUURMAN (admitted pro hac vice) 

DAVID E. KILLOUGH (State Bar No. 110719) 

DAVID P. BLANKE (admitted pro hac vice) 

ADAM V. FLOYD (admitted pro hac vice) 

CHRISTOPHER V. RYAN (admitted pro hac vice) 

GENTRY C. MCLEAN (admitted pro hac vice) 

The Terrace 7 

2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100 

Austin, TX 78746 

Tel: (512) 542-8428 

Fax: (512) 236-3253 

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP 

JAMES P. MARTIN (Bar #170044) 

One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Tel: (415) 421-6500 

Fax: (415) 421-2922 

Attorneys for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

OKI AMERICA, INC., ET AL., 

 PLAINTIFF, 

VS. 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 DEFENDANT. 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE EXPERT 

DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 COUNTERCLAIMANT, 

VS. 

OKI AMERICA, INC., OKI ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRY CO., LTD., OKI DATA 

CORPORATION AND OKI DATA AMERICAS,

INC., 

 COUNTER-DEFENDANTS. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 525 Filed 10/20/06 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE EXPERT DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On September 12, 2006, the Court issued an order prohibiting parties from filing 

“additional expert supplemental discovery” without leave of Court (Doc. 396). While the 

parties do not agree whether the Court’s order extends to the submission and consideration 

of expert declarations in support of Daubert and Summary Judgment motions, in order to 

resolve any ambiguity on the question, the parties hereby request leave of Court to file 

expert declarations in support of recently filed motions. 

On September 14, 2006, Oki filed a declaration of Dr. Richard Fair (Doc. 442) in 

support of its Motion to Grant Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of the ‘678 

Patent (Doc. 440) and in support of its Motion to Strike Smith Report and Portions of 

Neikirk Report Under Daubert (Doc. 436). 

Contemporaneous with this motion AMD is filing opposition briefs to both of Oki’s 

above mentioned motions. AMD seeks to have the declaration of Dr. Bruce Smith 

considered in support of its oppositions. Dr. Smith’s declaration is submitted in rebuttal to 

Dr. Fair’s declaration. 

The parties have previously agreed that AMD would not move to strike Dr. Fair’s 

declaration filed September 14, provided that Dr. Smith could submit a responsive declaration, and 

Oki would not oppose filing of a declaration by Dr. Smith, provided that the declaration is limited 

to the points raised in Dr. Fair’s declaration. For the express purpose of allowing Dr. Smith 

additional time to coordinate filing a declaration in rebuttal to Dr. Fair’s declaration, the parties 

have previously stipulated (Doc. 471), and this Court has already approved (Doc. 487) a 1-week 

extension of the deadline for filing AMD’s oppositions and Oki’s replies concerning the two 

above-referenced motions.

Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, the parties hereby request that the Court 

grant Oki leave to file the declaration of Dr. Fair in support of its above-referenced 

motions, and that it grant AMD leave to file a declaration of Dr. Smith in support of its 

oppositions to said motions. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 525 Filed 10/20/06 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE EXPERT DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: October 12, 2006 VINSON & ELKINS, LLP 

/s/ Adam V. Floyd

 Adam V. Floyd 

Attorney for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD & 

EVANS, PLLC 

/s/ J. C. Rozendaal

 J.C. Rozendaal 

Attorney for Oki America, et al. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:__________________________ _______________________________________ 

 Charles R. Breyer 

 United States District Judge 

October 19, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 525 Filed 10/20/06 Page 3 of 3