Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01088/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01088-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERNARD MARTINEZ, 

Plaintiff,

v.

DR. L. A. DELIO, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

CASE No. 1:11-cv-01088-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS FINDING

COGNIZABLE CLAIMS AND DISMISSING

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 16)

ACTION TO REMAIN OPEN

On July 1, 2011, Plaintiff Bernard Martinez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se

and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF

No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of California. Plaintiff declined to extend Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

all matters and for all purposes in this case. (ECF No. 5.)

On August 30, 2012, Findings and Recommendations Finding Cognizable Claims

and Dismissing of Certain Claims and Defendants (ECF No. 16) were filed. There the

-1-

Case 1:11-cv-01088-LJO-MJS Document 17 Filed 10/18/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Magistrate Judge recommended that all claims in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint

except for his Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Martha, Sonia, and

Nguyen, and all Defendants named in this action except for Defendants Martha, Sonia,

and Nguyen should now be dismissed with prejudice by the District Judge. 

The parties were notified that objection, if any, was due within fourteen days. No party

filed an objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court adopts the Findings and Recommendations filed August 30,

2012, in full, 

2. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint except for his Eighth Amendment

claims against Defendants Martha, Sonia, and Nguyen is DISMISSED with

prejudice, 

3. All Defendants named in this action except for Defendants Martha, Sonia,

and Nguyen are DISMISSED with prejudice, and

4. This action shall remain open. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 18, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

Case 1:11-cv-01088-LJO-MJS Document 17 Filed 10/18/12 Page 2 of 2