Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02252/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02252-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FILING OF SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF WALMART’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO.: C 01-2252-CRB 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

Brad Seligman (SBN 083838) 

Jocelyn D. Larkin (SBN 110817) 

THE IMPACT FUND 

125 University Avenue 

Berkeley, CA 94710 

Telephone: 510.845.3473 

Facsimile: 510.845.3654 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. (SBN 132099) 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

TBoutrous@gibsondunn.com 

Attorney for Defendant

Joseph M. Sellers

Christine E. Webber 

Jenny R. Yang 

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL 

PLLC 

West Tower, Suite 500 

1100 New York Avenue 

Washington, DC 20005 

Telephone: 202.408.4600 

Facsimile: 202.408.4699 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

BETTY DUKES, PATRICIA SURGESON, 

EDITH ARANA, DEBORAH GUNTER and 

CHRISTINE KWAPNOSKI, on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO.: C 01-2252-CRB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING FILING OF 

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN 

SUPPORT OF WAL-MART’S MOTION 

TO DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Betty Dukes, Patricia Surgeson, Edith Arana, Deborah 

Gunter, and Christine Kwapnoski (“Named Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“WalMart”), hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, on January 3, 2012, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, this Court established 

a briefing schedule on Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint, see Dkt. 780; 

WHEREAS, on January 13, 2012, Wal-Mart filed its Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended 

Complaint and a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, see Dkt. 781; 

Case 3:01-cv-02252-CRB Document 788 Filed 03/23/12 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FILING OF SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF WALMART’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO.: C 01-2252-CRB 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

WHEREAS, Wal-Mart wishes to file a supplemental memorandum in support of its motion to 

dismiss, not to exceed five pages, to assert an argument regarding the timeliness of the plaintiffs’ 

class allegations; 

WHEREAS, Wal-Mart has agreed that Named Plaintiffs may have an additional five pages 

and seven days in which to respond to all of the arguments made in support of Wal-Mart’s motion to 

dismiss; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Named Plaintiffs have agreed to Wal-Mart’s proposal and consented 

to the filing of the supplemental memorandum on the terms stated; and 

WHEREAS, the stipulated changes to the briefing schedule described below do not alter the 

date by which any reply brief by Wal-Mart shall be filed, such that all briefing shall be completed by 

the same date as was previously ordered by the Court, see Dkt. 769, 780; 

THEREFORE, the Named Plaintiffs and Wal-Mart stipulate and agree as follows: 

1. Wal-Mart may file a Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support 

of its Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint no later than March 21, 2012 that shall not 

exceed 5 pages; 

2. Named Plaintiffs’ response to Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended 

Complaint shall be filed no later than March 30, 2012 and shall not exceed 50 pages; 

3. The deadline for the filing of Wal-Mart’s reply, if one is to be filed, shall remain 

unchanged as April 13, 2012; 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:01-cv-02252-CRB Document 788 Filed 03/23/12 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FILING OF SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF WALMART’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO.: C 01-2252-CRB 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

4. The hearing date set for Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss shall be May 7, 2012 at 

10:00 a.m.. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: March 21, 2012 

By: /s/ Brad Seligman _ By: /s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. 

Brad Seligman (SBN 083838) Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. (SBN 132099) 

Jocelyn D. Larkin (SBN 110817) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

THE IMPACT FUND 333 South Grand Avenue 

125 University Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Telephone: 510.845.3473 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

Facsimile: 510.845.3654 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant 

I, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., attest that 

concurrence in the filing of this document 

has been obtained from the other signatory.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 DATE: MARCH 23, 2012 

 ___________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 CHARLES R. BREYER 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:01-cv-02252-CRB Document 788 Filed 03/23/12 Page 3 of 3