Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_03-cv-01617/USCOURTS-casd-3_03-cv-01617-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

03cv1617

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ILENE BUCHHOLZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVE HUMPHREY, et al., 

Defendants.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 03cv1617-L(WMc)

ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT

FROM THE RECORD

On November 13, 2006, Defendants filed a Notice of Motion by Defendants for Attorney

Fees, Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion by Defendants for Attorney

Fees, Declaration of Stephen D. Lucas in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Attorney Fees, and

Notice of Lodgment in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Attorney Fees (docket no. 141). 

Defendants filed essentially the same pleadings on October 11, 2006 (docket no. 138). By order

filed October 31, 2006, the court struck a pleading styled as “Defendant’s Motion for Attorney

Fees” (docket no. 138, attachment no. 1) for failure to comply with Civil Local Rule 7.1(f)(1)

and (h). Defendants were granted leave to replace the stricken pleading with one in compliance

with all pertinent Civil Local Rules. Instead of replacing only the stricken pleadings, Defendants

attempted to replace all of their pleadings filed October 11. Accordingly, the Court hereby

Case 3:03-cv-01617-L-WMC Document 143 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 03cv1617

strikes those pleadings as to which leave to refile had not been granted.

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to STRIKE FROM THE RECORD Declaration

of Stephen D. Lucas in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Attorney Fees and Notice of

Lodgment in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Attorney Fees (docket no. 141, attachments no.

2-4) filed November 13, 2006. 

2. In light of the parties’ continued disregard for the Court’s orders (see, e.g., orders filed

6/27/06 and 10/31/06) and local rules, they are hereby ADMONISHED that monetary sanctions

may be imposed for any future failure to comply will all applicable rules and orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 16, 2006

M. James Lorenz

United States District Court Judge

COPY TO: 

HON. LOUISA S. PORTER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ALL PARTIES/COUNSEL

Case 3:03-cv-01617-L-WMC Document 143 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 2