Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00160/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00160-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX

MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION

 /

This document relates to:

Paul Kahl 06-0159

Bennie Henderson 06-0159

Lula Eckols 06-0159

Melissa Griffin 06-0159

Maggie Mae Gross 06-0159

Jeffrey Dubose 06-0159

Lue Ella Jones 06-0159

Dorothy Clark 06-0159

Freddie Triplett 06-0159

Joe Lewis Brown 06-0159

E.Q. Eckford 06-0159

Dianne H. Baer 06-0159

Eone Virgil 06-0159

Antonientte Abram 06-0160

Sharon Johnson 06-0160

No. MDL 05-1699 CRB

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AND DISMISSING

PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS

The Court previously ordered the above plaintiffs to show cause why (1) The Gibson

Law Firm’s motion to withdraw as counsel should not be granted; and (2) each plaintiff’s

lawsuit should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. The Court

advised that if a plaintiff wished to contest the withdrawal of counsel and/or dismissal of the

plaintiff’s lawsuit for failure to prosecute, the plaintiff shall appear, either individually or

through new counsel, at a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on January 26, 2007 in Courtroom 8, 19th 

Case 3:06-cv-00160-CRB Document 9 Filed 01/26/07 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\showcauseorders\gibsonwithdrawalorder.wpd 2

Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102.

None of the plaintiffs appeared at the January 26 hearing and none of the plaintiffs has

otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, The Gibson Law Firm’s motion to

withdraw is GRANTED and the claims of the above plaintiffs are DISMISSED with

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00160-CRB Document 9 Filed 01/26/07 Page 2 of 2