Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01218/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01218-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Antolin Andrews,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 03-1218 WBS PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

S. Cervantes,

Defendant.

-oOoDecember 2, 2004, the court denied plaintiff’s request for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and closed the file upon the

ground he was in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). December 9,

2004, plaintiff appealed. February 23, 2005, plaintiff filed a

paper styled, “Motion to Reopen,” requesting this court set aside

the judgment based upon the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Andrews

v. King, 398 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2005). Plaintiff asserts this

court should entertain his motion because he has withdrawn the

appeal. Court records, however, do not show that the appeal has

Case 2:03-cv-01218-EFB Document 20 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

been dismissed. Accordingly, this court should decline to

entertain plaintiff’s February 23, 2005, motion.

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: May 26, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01218-EFB Document 20 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 2