Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-01300/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-01300-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CISCO SYSTEMS INC, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 13-cv-01300-JSW 

ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, 

STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE 

SCHEDULE AND BRIEFING LIMITS 

Re: Docket No. 343 

The Court has received and considered the parties’ stipulation to modify the case schedule 

and to enlarge the page limits on the parties’ anticipated motions for summary judgment. 

The Court GRANTS the request to depose Dr. Madisetti on March 22, 2016, although the 

deadline to complete expert discovery has passed. 

The Court also GRANTS the request to enlarge the page limits on motions for summary 

judgment. The parties shall have thirty (30) pages for opening briefs and opposition briefs, and 

shall have twenty (20) pages for the reply briefs. 

The Court also is willing to extend the deadlines for filing motions for summary judgment. 

However, it is not clear from the parties’ stipulation whether Plaintiffs also intend to file a motion 

for summary judgment. If that is the case, the Court still prefers to resolve any motions for 

summary judgment through a four brief process, especially if the issues, or claims, on which the 

parties are going to move overlap. In addition, the Cisco Defendants have moved to amend their 

Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses to include a claim for inequitable conduct. The hearing 

on that motion is not scheduled to be heard until April 22, 2016, which is after the parties’ 

proposed deadline to file motions for summary judgment. 

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS the parties to meet and confer further on the 

Case 4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document 344 Filed 03/21/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ant

det

cro

ope

tha

thr

ma

file

201

and

Da

ticipated issu

termine if th

oss-motions o

ening brief. 

If the P

at are unrelat

ee brief form

Finally,

akes sense in

The par

e motions for

16. The Cou

d it VACAT

IT IS S

ated: March 2

ues and claim

ere are any o

on a four bri

Plaintiffs do i

ted to the iss

mat. 

, the parties 

n light of the 

rties shall su

r summary j

urt VACATE

TES the May 

SO ORDER

21, 2016 

ms that will b

overlapping 

ief schedule,

intend to file

sues raised b

should meet

pending mo

ubmit a furth

udgment, an

ES the deadl

20, 2016 he

RED. 

2

be addressed

issues or cla

, and the par

e a motion fo

y Defendant

t and confer 

otions. 

her stipulatio

nd a date for 

line of April

earing date. 

d in a motion

aims. If so, t

rty who bear

or summary 

ts’ motion, t

on a filing d

on and propo

r hearing, tha

l 8, 2016 to f

JE

Un

n for summa

the parties s

rs the burden

judgment, b

the Court wi

deadline and

osed order re

at clarifies th

file motions 

EFFREY S. W

nited States D

ary judgmen

hall proceed

n of proof sh

but on issues

ll follow a tr

d a hearing d

egarding the 

hese issues b

for summar

WHITE 

District Judg

nt to 

d by filing 

hould file the

s or claims 

raditional 

date that 

deadlines to

by April 1, 

ry judgment 

ge 

e

o

Case 4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document 344 Filed 03/21/16 Page 2 of 2