Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00874/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00874-42/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Thad A. Davis (SBN 220503) 

Michael Li-Ming Wong (SBN 194130) 

Amy E. Craig (pro hac vice) 

ROPES & GRAY LLP 

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2200 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3711 

Telephone: (415) 315-6300 

Facsimile: (415) 315-6350 

Attorneys for Defendants 

James A. Hennefer (SBN 059490) 

HENNEFER, FINLEY & WOOD, LLP 

425 California Street, 19th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94194-2296 

Telephone: (415) 421-1815 

Facsimile: (415) 421-1815 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Richard B. Fox, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Good Samaritan Hospital, Good Samaritan 

Hospital Medical Staff, Good Samaritan 

Hospital LP, Samaritan, LLC, HCA Inc., 

William Piché, Paul N Beaupre, M.D., Arthur 

W Douville, M.D., Mark S McConnell, M.D., 

Kenneth I Tan, M.D.

 Defendants. 

______________________________________

AND CONSOLIDATED CASE 

Case No. C 04-00874 RS 

[Consolidated for all purposes with Case No. 

08 CV 01098 RS] 

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR A 

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Date: N/A 

Time: N/A 

Place: Courtroom 3, Seventeenth Floor 

Hon. Judge Richard Seeborg 

*E-Filed 4/6/10*

Case 5:04-cv-00874-RS Document 453 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 4
__________________________________________________1______________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

All parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request, 

pursuant to stipulation under Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, that the Court enter an order 

enlarging the time for Defendants to file a Motion for Attorney’s Fees pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2) and Civil Local Rule 54-5 and for Plaintiff to file a responsive 

motion. The changing of these dates will not change the date for trial as the Court entered 

judgment in favor of the Defendants on March 29, 2010 (Doc. No. 449) and will not change the 

date for Plaintiff to file a Notice of Appeal. 

The following background, supported, in compliance with Civil Local Rule 6-2 by the 

Declaration of Amy E. Craig filed herewith, sets forth the reasons for the requested change of 

dates, previous time modifications in the past, and the effect of the requested time modifications 

on the schedule for the case. Specifically, the Court is requested to issue the following Order: 

1. Defendants shall file a Motion for Attorney’s Fees pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 54(d)(2) and Civil Local Rule 54-5 on or before April 19, 2010. 

2. Plaintiff shall file a responsive motion to Defendants’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees 

on or before May 10, 2010. 

So stipulated and respectfully submitted: 

Dated: April 5, 2010 ROPES & GRAY LLP 

 By: _/s/ Thad A. Davis_________ 

 THAD A. DAVIS 

 Attorneys for All Defendants 

Dated: April 5, 2010 SHANNON, MARTIN, FINKELSTEIN & 

 ALVARADO, P.C. 

 By: _/s/ George A. Shannon, Jr.___ 

 GEORGE A. SHANNON, JR. 

 Attorneys for Defendant HCA Inc. 

Dated: April 5, 2010 HARDY ERICH BROWN & WILSON 

 By: _/s/ David L. Perrault_________ 

 DAVID L. PERRAULT 

Case 5:04-cv-00874-RS Document 453 Filed 04/06/10 Page 2 of 4
__________________________________________________2______________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Attorneys for All Defendants 

Dated: April 5, 2010 HENNEFER FINLEY & WOOD LLP 

 By: _/s/ James A. Hennefer_________ 

 JAMES A. HENNEFER 

 Attorneys for Richard B. Fox, M.D. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: ____________ _______________________________ 

 Honorable Richard Seeborg 

 United States District Court Judge 

4/6/10

Case 5:04-cv-00874-RS Document 453 Filed 04/06/10 Page 3 of 4
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CERTIFICATION BY THAD A. DAVIS PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE NO. 45, 

SECTION X. RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

 1. I am a lawyer licensed to practice law in the State of California, am a partner in the 

law firm of Ropes & Gray LLP, and represent all defendants in this action. The statements 

herein are made on my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness I could and would testify 

thereto. 

 2. The above e-filing document contains multiple signatures. I declare that 

concurrence has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this document with the 

Court. Pursuant to Northern District of California General Order 45(X), I shall maintain records 

to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for 

inspection upon request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including 

appeal, if any). 

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct on April 5, 2010. 

__/s/ Thad A Davis_______ 

 Thad A. Davis 

Case 5:04-cv-00874-RS Document 453 Filed 04/06/10 Page 4 of 4