Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01635/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01635-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEVAN KAYAIAN, ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

CITY OF FRESNO ) 

 )

Defendant. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-1635-OWW-SMS 

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION

WITH PREJUDICE (DOCS. 1,7)

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a

civil action. 

On December 22, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings

and a recommendation that the action be dismissed without leave

to amend and with prejudice because 1) the complaint fails to

state facts constituting a basis for this Court’s subject matter

jurisdiction; 2) the complaint fails to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted; 3) Plaintiff’s complaint is legally

frivolous; and 4) any attempt at amendment would be futile. The

Court granted Plaintiff thirty days within which to file

objections. The findings and recommendation were served on

Plaintiff on the same date. Over thirty days have passed, but

Case 1:06-cv-01635-OWW -SMS Document 8 Filed 02/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff has not filed any objections or sought an extension of

time within which to do so.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo th

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the findings and recommendation are

supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation filed December 22, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The action IS DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and

3. The Clerk of Court IS DIRECTED to close this action

because this order terminates the action in its entirety.IT IS SO

ORDERED.

Emm0d6Dated: February 8, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01635-OWW -SMS Document 8 Filed 02/09/07 Page 2 of 2