Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06946/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06946-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS CASE NOS. C 06-6946, 07-6055 MHP 

REGARDING U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,402,324 & 6,664,817 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JAMES A. OLIFF (Pro Hac Vice) 

JOHN W. O'MEARA (Pro Hac Vice), 

WILLIAM J. UTERMOHLEN (Pro Hac Vice), 

OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLC 

277 South Washington St., Suite 500 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

Tel: (703) 836-6400; Fax: (703) 836-2787 

e-mails: joliff@oliff.com, jomeara@oliff.com, 

wutermohlen@oliff.com 

SUSAN VAN KEULEN 

CA Bar No. 136060, svankeulen@thelen.com 

CHRISTOPHER L. OGDEN 

CA Bar No. 235517, cogden@thelen.com 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER, LLP 

225 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 1200 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Tel: (408) 292-5800; Fax (408) 287-8040 

Attorneys for Seiko Epson Corporation, Epson 

Research and Development, Inc. and Epson 

America, Inc. 

YITAI HU 

CA Bar No. 248085, yhu@akingump.com 

ELIZABETH H. RADER 

CA Bar No. 184963 erader@akingump.com 

AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & 

FELD LLP 

Two Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

Telephone: (650) 838-2000; 

Fax: (650) 838-2001 

Attorneys for Coretronic Corporation and 

Optoma Technology, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CORETRONIC CORPORATION and 

OPTOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

 Defendants. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case Nos. C 06-6946, 07-6055 MHP 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING CLAIMS RELATING TO 

U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,402,324 & 6,644,817 

 

WHEREAS Seiko Epson Corporation (“SEC”) asserted in this case that Coretronic 

Corporation ("Coretronic") and Optoma Technology, Inc. ("Optoma") infringed U.S. Patent No. 

6,402,324 (“the 324 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,664,817 (“the 817 Patent”); and 

Case 3:06-cv-06946-MHP Document 214 Filed 07/15/08 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS CASE NOS. C 06-6946, 07-6055 MHP 

REGARDING U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,402,324 & 6,664,817 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS Coretronic and Optoma have denied infringing the 324 and 817 Patents and have 

asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment that those patents are invalid; and 

WHEREAS SEC has indicated its intent to withdraw its infringement assertions as to the 324 

and 817 Patents in this case; and 

WHEREAS the parties agree that in light of such withdrawal, the issue of the 324 and 817 

Patents' validity need not be litigated and resolved at this time; 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND ASK THE COURT FOR AN 

ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 

Dismissing without prejudice SEC's assertion of infringement of the 324 and 817 Patents 

against Coretronic and Optoma and dismissing without prejudice Coretronic's and Optoma's 

declaratory judgment actions seeking a declaration regarding the invalidity of the 324 and 817 

patents. 

DATED: July __, 2008 

 Respectfully submitted, 

_____________/s/______________________ Yitai Hu (CA Bar No. 248085) 

Elizabeth H. Rader (CA Bar No. 184963) 

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD 

LLP 

2 Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400 

Palo Alto, California 94306 

Telephone: (650) 838-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 838-2001 

Attorneys for Coretronic Corporation 

_____________/s/_______________________ James A. Oliff (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

John W. O'Meara (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

William J. Utermohlen (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLC 

277 South Washington Street, Suite 500 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

Telephone: 703-836-6400 

Facsimile: 703-836-2787 

Susan van Keulen (CA Bar No. 136060) 

Christopher L. Ogden (CA Bar No. 235517) 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER LLP 

225 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 1200 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Telephone: (408) 292-5800 

Facsimile: (408) 287-8040 

Attorneys for Seiko Epson Corporation, Epson 

Research & Development Corporation and 

Epson America, Inc. 

Case 3:06-cv-06946-MHP Document 214 Filed 07/15/08 Page 2 of 3
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS CASE NOS. C 06-6946, 07-6055 MHP 

REGARDING U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,402,324 & 6,664,817 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of 

perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Elizabeth H. Rader. 

Dated: July __, 2008 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Christopher L. Ogden, Esq. 

(State Bar No. 235517) 

Attorneys for Seiko Epson Corporation 

Having considered the parties’ statements and stipulations set forth above, and good cause 

appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

SEC's claims of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,402,324 and U.S. Patent No. 6,664,817 

against Coretronic and Optoma and Coretronic's and Optoma's declaratory judgment actions seeking 

a declaration regarding the invalidity of the 324 and 817 patents are DISMISSED without prejudice. 

Dated: _____________, 2008 _____________________________________ 

 Marilyn Hall Patel 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

July 14

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-06946-MHP Document 214 Filed 07/15/08 Page 3 of 3