Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00328/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00328-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CESAR ALFREDO TORRES, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

)

JAMES A. YATES, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-CV-00328 LJO SMS HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #16]

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS [Doc. #14]

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On July 10, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended Respondent’s motion to dismiss be GRANTED and the petition for writ of habeas

corpus be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. Petitioner was given

an opportunity to withdraw the unexhausted claims and proceed with exhausted claims, but opted not

to do so. This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date

of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

Case 1:07-cv-00328-CW Document 17 Filed 08/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued July 10, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 24, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00328-CW Document 17 Filed 08/27/07 Page 2 of 2