Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00475/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00475-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

ALSCHULER 

GROSSMAN 

STEIN & 

KAHAN LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

837842_1.DOC 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL;

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP 

Mark A. Neubauer (No. 73728) 

Katessa C. Davis (No. 146922) 

1620 26th Street 

Fourth Floor, North Tower 

Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060 

MNeubauer@agsk.com

KDavis@agsk.com

Telephone: 310-907-1000 

Facsimile: 310-907-2000 

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant 

DePUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., an Indiana Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

JENNIFER BRONSON, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DePUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., an 

Indiana Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

DePUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., an 

Indiana Corporation, 

 Cross-Claimant 

vs. 

JENNIFER BRONSON, an individual, 

 Cross-Defendant. 

CASE NO. CIV.S-04-0475 WBS GGH 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 

Case 2:04-cv-00475-WBS-GGH Document 26 Filed 06/08/05 Page 1 of 3
ALSCHULER 

GROSSMAN 

STEIN & 

KAHAN LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

837842_1.DOC 2 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL;

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and CrossDefendant Jennifer Bronson and Defendant and Cross-Claimant DePuy Orthopaedics, 

Inc., through their respective counsel of record, that the above action is dismissed with 

prejudice, each party to bear their own fees and costs. 

DATED: May ___, 2005 ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP

MARK N. NEUBAUER 

KATESSA C. DAVIS 

By 

MARK N. NEUBAUER 

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant 

DePUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., an Indiana 

corporation 

DATED: May ___, 2005 WILLIAMS WESTER & HALL, LLP 

BARRY WESTER 

SCOTT WILLIAMS 

MATTHEW D. BREKHUS 

By 

BARRY WESTER 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant 

JENNIFER BRONSON 

ORDER

Based upon the Stipulation between the Parties and good cause appearing 

there, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE ACTION IS DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE, EACH PARTY TO BEAR HER OR ITS OWN FEES AND 

COSTS. 

Dated: June 7, 2005 

Case 2:04-cv-00475-WBS-GGH Document 26 Filed 06/08/05 Page 2 of 3
ALSCHULER 

GROSSMAN 

STEIN & 

KAHAN LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

837842_1.DOC 3 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL;

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and 

not a party to the within action. My business address is Alschuler Grossman Stein & 

Kahan LLP, The Water Garden, 1620 26th Street, Fourth Floor, North Tower, Santa 

Monica, California 90404-4060. On June 7, 2005, I served a true copy of the within 

documents: 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER THEREON 

 ̈ by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax 

number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. 

ý by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage 

thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Santa Monica, California, 

addressed as set forth below. 

 ̈ by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope, with the 

overnight delivery charge prepaid, addressed as set forth below, and 

deposited in a box or facility regularly maintained by the overnight delivery 

service carrier, . 

 ̈ by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the 

address(es) set forth below. 

Scott Williams, Esq. 

Matthew D. Brekhus, Esq. 

Williams Wester & Hall, LLP 

755 Baywood Drive 

Suite 185 

Petaluma, CA 94954 

Fax (707) 769-2999 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CrossDefendant Jennifer Bronson 

I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing 

correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. 

Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course 

of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if 

postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit 

for mailing in affidavit. 

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this 

court at whose direction the service was made. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California 

that the above is true and correct. 

Executed on this June 7, 2005. 

Susan McLoughlin 

Case 2:04-cv-00475-WBS-GGH Document 26 Filed 06/08/05 Page 3 of 3