Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02136/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02136-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Brady Armstrong,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-2136 GEB PAN P

vs. Order

D. L. Runnels, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis and

without counsel in a civil rights action. 

The United States Marshal has returned process directed to

defendants Rumble and Mangis unserved because they could not be

found. Plaintiff must provide new information about where these

defendants may be served with process. Plaintiff may seek such

information through discovery, the California Public Records Act,

California Government Code § 6250, et seq., or any other means 

available but must proceed with haste because Fed. R. Civ. P. 

Case 2:04-cv-02136-GEB-EFB Document 77 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

4(m) requires an action be dismissed as to a defendant not served

within 120 days after filing the complaint unless the time is

enlarged based upon a demonstration of good cause. If

plaintiff’s access to the required information is denied or

unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may seek judicial intervention.

Accordingly:

1. The clerk of the court shall mail plaintiff two forms

USM-285 and a copy of the pleading filed June 14, 2005. 

2. Within 90 days from the date this order is signed,

plaintiff may submit the attached Notice of Submission of

Documents with the completed forms USM-285 providing instructions

for service of process upon defendants Rumble and Mangis and two

copies of the pleading provided to plaintiff. 

3. If plaintiff does not provide new instructions for

service of process upon defendants Rumble and Mangis within the

time allowed or show good cause for such failure I will recommend

this action be dismissed as to the defendant who is not served.

So ordered.

Dated: January 24, 2006. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02136-GEB-EFB Document 77 Filed 01/25/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Brady Armstrong,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S-04-2136 GEB PAN P

vs. Notice of Submission of Documents

D. L. Runnels, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff hereby submits the following documents in

compliance with the court's order filed :

 0 completed summons form

 2 completed forms USM-285 

 2 copies of the June 14, 2005 

 Amended Complaint

Dated: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-02136-GEB-EFB Document 77 Filed 01/25/06 Page 3 of 3