Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04321/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04321-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS 

BARBARA J. PARKER (SBN 69722) 

bjparker@oaklandcityattorney.org 

OAKLAND CITY ATTORNEY 

200 N. Main Street, Room 800 

One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6TH Floor 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 238-6512 

Facsimile: (510) 238-6500 

JOEL LIBERSON (SBN 164857) 

joel@taresources.com 

TRIAL & APPELLATE RESOURCES, P.C. 

400 Continental Blvd., 6th Floor 

El Segundo, CA 90245 

Telephone: (310) 426-2361 

Facsimile: (310) 426-2001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY OF OAKLAND 

BART H. WILLIAMS (SBN 134009) 

bart.williams@mto.com 

TERRY E. SANCHEZ (SBN 101318) 

terry.sanchez@mto.com 

DANIEL P. COLLINS (SBN 139164) 

daniel.collins@mto.com 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071-1560 

Telephone: (213) 683-9100 

Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NOTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

WELLS FARGO & CO. and WELLS FARGO 

BANK, N.A. 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:15-cv-04321-SK

[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING 

SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS 

 

Case 3:15-cv-04321-EMC Document 20 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION submitted by Plaintiff City of Oakland and Defendants 

Wells Fargo & Co, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., IT IS SO ORDERED as follows: 

(1) Plaintiff shall file and serve its opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss on or 

before Monday, December 14, 2015. 

(2) Defendants shall file and serve their reply in support of the motion to dismiss on or 

before January 8, 2015. 

(3) All dates established in the September 22, 2015 Order are vacated. The Initial Case 

Management Conference provided for by Local R. 16-2, all disclosures by both sides pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a), and the ADR Certifications provided for by Local R. 16-8 are deferred until 

the Court has issued a ruling upon Defendants’ motion to dismiss. 

DATED: October ___, 2015 

 _________________________________ 

 

14

Case 3:15-cv-04321-EMC Document 20 Filed 10/14/15 Page 2 of 2