Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04350/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04350-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 8:1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ADR CERTIFICATION

C07-4350 CRB 1

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS, SC SBN 9990

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143

Assistant United States Attorney

Chief, Civil Division

MELANIE L. PROCTOR, CSBN 228971

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6730

FAX: (415) 436-6927

Attorneys for Respondents

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LYUBOV MOROZOVA, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

Department of Homeland Security, MICHAEL )

CHERTOFF, Secretary; United States )

Citizenship and Immigration Services, EMILIO )

T. GONZALEZ, Director; United States )

Citizenship and Immigration Services, )

ROSEMARY MELVILLE, District Director; )

U.S. Attorney General, ALBERTO GONZALES; )

Federal Bureau of Investigation, ROBERT S. )

MUELLER, III, Director, )

)

Respondents. )

________________________________________)

No. C 07-4350 CRB

FORMAL REQUEST TO BE EXEMPT

FROM ADR PROCESS; PROPOSED

ORDER

Each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has read either the handbook entitled “Dispute

Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California,” or the specified portions of the ADR

Unit’s Internet site <www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov>, discussed the available dispute resolution options

provided by the court and private entities, and considered whether this case might benefit from any of

them. 

Here, the parties agree that referral to a formal ADR process will not be beneficial because this

mandamus action is limited to Petitioner’s request for relief pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b). Given the

Case 3:07-cv-04350-JL Document 17 Filed 11/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

I, Melanie L. Proctor, hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any

signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/S/) within this efiled document.

ADR CERTIFICATION

C07-4350 CRB 2

substance of the action and the lack of any potential middle ground, ADR will only serve to multiply

the proceedings and unnecessarily tax court resources. Accordingly, pursuant to ADR L.R. 3-3(c),

the parties request the case be removed from the ADR Multi-Option Program and that they be excused

from participating in the ADR phone conference and any further formal ADR process.

Dated: November 16, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney

 /s/ MELANIE L. PROCTOR1

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Respondents

Dated: November 16, 2007 /s/ 

CARRIE ROSENBAUM

Attorney for Petitioner

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

November 20, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:07-cv-04350-JL Document 17 Filed 11/20/07 Page 2 of 2