Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01779/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01779-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

2 The Standing Order for Civil Practice in Cases Assigned for All Purposes to Magistrate

Judge Patricia V. Trumbull (rev. 4/25/03) requires that, within two weeks after any party files a

dispositive motion, all parties who have not already done so must file either a consent to Magistrate

Judge jurisdiction or else a requests for reassignment to a District Court Judge.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ROBERT A. BROWN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 05-1779 PVT

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON

MOTION TO DISMISS; AND SETTING

DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A

CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A

MAGISTRATE JUDGE, OR ELSE A

DECLINATION TO AND REQUEST FOR

REASSIGNMENT

On May 6, 2005, Defendants Google, Inc. and Marissa Mayer (“Defendants”) filed a motion

to dismiss.1 Pursuant to this court’s standing order each party was thus required to file either a

consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, or else a request for reassignment, no later than May 20,

2005.2 To date, no party has complied. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than June 15, 2005, all parties shall file either a

Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, or else a Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate

Judge and Request for Reassignment. Both forms are available from the clerk of the court, or from

Case 5:05-cv-01779-RMW Document 22 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

the “forms” section of the court’s website (www.cand.uscourts.gov).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss is continued

to 10:00 a.m. on July 12, 2005.

Dated: 6/2/05

 /s/ Patricia V. Trumbull 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01779-RMW Document 22 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2