Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03626/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03626-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

-1- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Allan J. Cory SBN: 224289 

Email: cory@sonic.net 

LAW OFFICE OF ALLAN J. CORY 

740 4th Street, 

Santa Rosa, CA 95404 

Office: 707-527-8810 

Fax: 707-569-1547 

Attorney for Plaintiff, 

Jose Vera 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSE VERA 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC; 

CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE 

CORPORATION; 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY 

AMERICAS, IN TRUST FOR, RESIDENTIAL

ACCREDIT LOANS, INC. MORTGAGE 

ASSET-BACKED PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-QO4; 

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; 

HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC; 

HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL NETWORK, 

INC., a business organization, form unknown; 

TRIMERICA MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 

a business organization, form unknown. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: CV 09-03626-CW 

Hon. Claudia Wilken 

 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

RE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ORIGINALLY 

SET FOR HEARING ON FEBRUARY 18, 

2010) 

 

)

Case 4:09-cv-03626-CW Document 87 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 4
-2- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Plaintiff Jose Vera (“Plaintiff”), by and through counsel of record, and Defendants 

Homecomings Financial, LLC (“Homecomings”), GMAC Mortgage Corporation (“GMAC”), 

Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation (“Cal-Western”), and Mortgage Electronic Registration 

System (“MERS”), by and through their respective counsel of record stipulate as follows: 

 WHEREAS all parties have in principal agreed on a proposed settlement in the above 

action and are making a good faith effort to dedicate the resolution to a final writing; 

 WHEREAS it is believed by all parties that such settlement may be achieved without 

further involvement by the court; 

 WHEREAS it is believed by all parties that such settlement will result in the dismissal 

of all parties to the action; 

 WHEREAS Homecomings, GMAC, and MERS have a reply due to Plaintiff’s 

Opposition Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint by February 4, 

2010; 

 WHEREAS all parties believe justice will be furthered and judicial resources conserved 

if Homecomings, GMAC, and MERS are allowed additional time to reply to Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint; 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, and the parties request that the Court Order that any 

reply by Homecomings, GMAC, and MERS to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint be filed no later than February 18, 2010. Alternatively, 

the parties request that the Court continue the hearing date at least 2 weeks to March 4, 2010, 

making Homecomings, GMAC, and MERS’ Reply due on February 18, 2010. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 4:09-cv-03626-CW Document 87 Filed 02/03/10 Page 2 of 4
-3- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: February 1, 2010 

LAW OFFICE OF ALLAN J. CORY 

By: /S/ Allan Cory 

Allan J. Cory 

Attorney for Plaintiff JOSE VERA 

DATED: February 1, 2010 

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP 

By: /S/ Robin P. Wright 

Robin P. Wright 

Attorney for Defendant CAL-WESTERN 

RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION 

DATED: February 1, 2010 

HOUSER AND ALLISON 

By: /S/ Robert L. Driessen 

Robert L. Driessen 

Attorneys for Defendant MORTGAGE 

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, 

INC. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 4:09-cv-03626-CW Document 87 Filed 02/03/10 Page 3 of 4
-4- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: February 1, 2010 

PALMER, LOMBARDI & DONOHUE LLP 

By: /S/ Frederick A. Haist 

Frederick A. Haist 

Attorneys for Defendant GMAC MORTGAGE, 

LLC (f/k/a GMAC MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION) and HOMECOMINGS 

FINANCIAL, LLC (f/k/a HOMECOMINGS 

FINANCIAL NETWORK, INC.) 

ORDER

 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, any reply by 

Homecomings, GMAC, and MERS to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

the Second Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than February 18, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 2/3/10 

Dated:_______________ ________________________________ 

 Hon. Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Court Judge

Case 4:09-cv-03626-CW Document 87 Filed 02/03/10 Page 4 of 4