Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01707/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01707-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY GASTON, No. CIV S-03-1707-LKK-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

EDWARD CADEN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On March 23, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

Case 2:03-cv-01707-LKK -CMK Document 67 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 23, 2006, are adopted in

full;

2. Plaintiff’s request, entitled “Notice and Motion for Full Federal

Investigation on the Deliberate Destruction and/or Confiscation of all Plaintiff’s Legal Material

in This Matter,” is denied;

3. Plaintiff’s request, entitled “Motion for Default Judgment,” is denied;

4. Plaintiff’s request, entitled “Plaintiff Motion to Obtain Court Order to

Obtain Possession and Access to a Typewriter During Litigation of the Above-Entitled Matter,”

is denied;

5. Defendants “CDC” and “CMF” are dismissed as immune under the

Eleventh Amendment;

6. Defendants Cappell, Arceo, and Valdez are dismissed pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m); and

7. Defendants Caden, Aguirre, Haley, Manuel, and Prebula are directed to

file a response to the second amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this

order.

DATED: July 6, 2006.

 

Lawrence K. Karlton

Senior Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01707-LKK -CMK Document 67 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2