Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00069/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00069-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC 

Harrison J. Frahn IV (Bar No. 206822) 

hfrahn@stblaw.com 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 251-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 

Attorney for Defendant Light In The Box Limited 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

E & E CO., LTD., a California corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

LIGHT IN THE BOX LIMITED, a Hong 

Kong corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC 

Judge Edward M. Chen 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Second Amended Complaint Filed: 

October 14, 2015 

Current CMC Date: January 21, 2015 

Plaintiff E & E Co., Ltd., (“Plaintiff” or “E & E”) and Defendant Light In The Box 

Limited (“Defendant” or “LITB Limited”) (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate to a 

thirteen day extension of Defendant LITB Limited’s time to answer, move against, or otherwise 

respond to the Second Amended Complaint from December 15, 2015, to and including December 

28, 2015. The Parties’ stipulation is based on the following facts: 

1. Plaintiff E & E filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) in the above 

captioned case against Defendant LITB Limited on October 14, 2015 (Dkt. No. 60); 

2. The Parties conferred and jointly stipulated to enlarge the time for LITB Limited to 

respond to the SAC to thirty (30) days, to and including November 13, 2015 (Dkt. No. 59); 

Case 3:15-cv-00069-EMC Document 71 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC

3. After ongoing settlement discussions, the Parties entered into a joint stipulation and 

proposed order continuing the Case Management Conference scheduled for December 10, 2015, 

and extending Defendant LITB Limited’s time to respond to the SAC from November 13, 2015 to 

December 1, 2015 (Dkt. No. 66), which order was entered by the Court on November 16, 2015 

(Dkt. No. 67); 

4. On November 30, 2015, the Parties again entered a joint stipulation to extend the 

time for LITB to respond to the SAC from December 1, 2015 to and including December 15, 2015 

(Dkt. No. 68), which order was entered by the Court on December 2, 2015 (Dkt. No. 69); 

5. The Parties continue to engage in settlement discussions and would like time to 

continue their settlement talks before taking the time and expense of responding to the SAC; 

6. The Parties submit that this agreement was made in the spirit of conserving judicial 

resources and is in the best interests of the Parties; 

7. The agreed upon extension will have no impact on the timing for the Case 

Management Conference currently scheduled for January 21, 2016, or any related events; 

8. The Parties, therefore, respectfully request that Defendant LITB Limited’s time to 

answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the SAC be extended from December 15, 2015, to 

and including December 28, 2015. 

Dated: December 15, 2015 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV Harrison J. Frahn IV 

 hfrahn@stblaw.com 

 Attorney for Defendant, Light In The Box Limited

 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 

By: /s/ John Shaeffer John Shaeffer 

jshaeffer@foxrothschild.com 

Ashe Puri 

apuri@foxrothschild.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, E & E CO., LTD. 

Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing 

of this document has been obtained from the signatories to this document. 

Case 3:15-cv-00069-EMC Document 71 Filed 12/18/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

1. Defendant LITB Limited’s time to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to 

the Second Amended Complaint is extended by thirteen days, from December 15, 2015, to and 

including December 28, 2015. 

Dated: December ___, 2015 _________________________________ 

 Hon. Edward M. Chen, 

 United States District Judge 

18

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00069-EMC Document 71 Filed 12/18/15 Page 3 of 3