Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01186/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01186-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANNY JAMES COHEA,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01186-LJO-SKO PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 2, 11, 25, 31)

Plaintiff Danny James Cohea (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 18, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which

was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and

Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. (Doc. #31.) Plaintiff filed an Objection to the

Findings and Recommendations on December 14, 2009. (Doc. #37.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 18, 2009, are adopted in full;

and

///

1

Case 1:08-cv-01186-LJO -BAM Document 42 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, filed on August 13, 2008, is

DENIED;

3. Plaintiff’s petitions for a writ of mandamus, filed on October 16, 2008 and

September 8, 2009, are DENIED; and

4. Plaintiff’s request for this action to be certified as a class action is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 22, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-01186-LJO -BAM Document 42 Filed 04/22/10 Page 2 of 2