Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04065/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04065-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK COTTER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LYFT, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-04065-VC 

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 

DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE NOTICE OF NEW 

AUTHORITY

Re: Dkt. No. 90

Because the Court has denied the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, Docket 

No. 94, Lyft's Motion for Administrative Relief to file a Notice of New Authority, Docket No. 90, 

is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2015

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-04065-VC Document 97 Filed 03/13/15 Page 1 of 1