Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05118/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05118-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 Case No. C06-05118 JF 

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT,

DISCOVERY, AND HEARING DATES

A/72456877.1 

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

JAMES B. LEWIS (SBN 71669) 

WILLIAM F. ABRAMS (SBN 88805) 

RUBY M. WAYNE (SBN 229538) 

1900 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, California 94303-2223 

Telephone: (650) 849-4400 

Facsimile: (650) 849-4800 

james.lewis@bingham.com 

william.abrams@bingham.com 

ruby.wayne@bingham.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

TOWNSHEND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, L.L.C., 

A California L.L.C. 

Morrison & Foerster LLP 

JAMES POOLEY (SBN 058041) 

L. SCOTT OLIVER (SBN 174824) 

DIANA LUO (SBN 233712) 

755 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 

Telephone: (650) 813-5600 

Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 

jpooley@mofo.com 

soliver@mofo.com 

dluo@mofo.com 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterplaintiff 

BROADCOM CORPORATION, 

A California Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

TOWNSHEND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 

L.L.C., a California L.L.C., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BROADCOM CORPORATION, a California 

corporation, 

Defendant, 

and related counterclaims. 

No. C06-05118 JF (RS) 

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

CONTINUANCE OF CASE 

MANAGEMENT, DISCOVERY, AND 

HEARING DATES 

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 7-12, Townshend Intellectual Property, L.L.C. 

and Broadcom Corporation (collectively “the Parties”) hereby jointly submit this Supplemental 

**E-filed 3/14/08**

Case 5:06-cv-05118-JF Document 106 Filed 03/14/08 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 Case No. C06-05118 JF 

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT,

DISCOVERY, AND HEARING DATES

A/72456877.1 

Stipulation regarding a further 15-day continuance of case management, discovery, and hearing 

dates so that the parties may continue to focus on settlement efforts and request that the Court 

adopt it as a Continuance Order: 

WHEREAS, on February 15, 2008, the Parties submitted a Stipulation to continue case 

management, discovery, and hearing dates by 14 days so that the parties could focus on 

settlement efforts; 

On February 22, 2008, the Court adopted this Stipulation as its Continuance Order; 

On February 28, 2008, the Parties submitted a stipulation to continue case management, 

discovery, and hearing dates by 7 days so that the parties could focus on settlement efforts; 

The Parties are working to finalize and execute a written settlement agreement by March 

21, 2008; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, and through their respective 

attorneys of record, as follows: 

The Parties will continue to endeavor in good faith to finalize and execute a written 

settlement agreement by March 21, 2008; 

To allow the parties to focus on completing a written settlement agreement by March 21, 

2008, and avoid further costs, the Court shall further continue by 15 days all case management, 

discovery, and hearing dates, including but not limited to those identified in the February 15, 

2008 Stipulation, or to later dates, subject to the Court’s calendar; 

The Parties further request that Magistrate Judge Seeborg continue to suspend his 

consideration of the Parties’ February 11, 2008 Joint Letter Brief until after March 21, 2008; and 

The Parties will report to the Court by March 21, 2008 the result of their settlement 

efforts. 

///

Case 5:06-cv-05118-JF Document 106 Filed 03/14/08 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 Case No. C06-05118 JF 

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT,

DISCOVERY, AND HEARING DATES

A/72456877.1 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ____________________ _________________________________ 

Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

United States District Court Judge 

 

DATED: March 6, 2008 

By: /s/ Ruby M. Wayne 

Ruby M. Wayne 

ruby.wayne@bingham.com 

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TOWNSHEND INTELLECTUAL 

PROPERTY, LLC 

DATED: March 6, 2008 

By: /s/ Diana Luo 

Diana Luo 

dluo@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BROADCOM CORPORATION

3/14/08

Case 5:06-cv-05118-JF Document 106 Filed 03/14/08 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4 Case No. C06-05118 JF 

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT,

DISCOVERY, AND HEARING DATES

A/72456877.1 

CERTIFICATION BY RUBY M. WAYNE PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE NO. 45, 

SECTION X. RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

1. I am a lawyer licensed to practice law in the State of California, and am an 

associate in the law firm of Bingham McCutchen LLP, counsel for plaintiff Townshend 

Intellectual Property LLC. The statements herein are made on my personal knowledge, and if 

called as a witness I could and would testify thereto. 

2. The above e-filed document contains another signatory. I declare that 

concurrence has been obtained from the other signatory to file this jointly prepared document 

with the Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support this 

concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request 

by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 

3. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct on March 6, 2008. 

By: /s/ Ruby M. Wayne 

Ruby M. Wayne 

ruby.wayne@bingham.com 

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TOWNSHEND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC 

Case 5:06-cv-05118-JF Document 106 Filed 03/14/08 Page 4 of 4