Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00476/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00476-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON DAVID YONAI,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0476 FCD DAD P

vs.

S.V.S.P. EMPLOYEES, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this action without paying the

required filing fee or submitting an application to proceed in forma pauperis. On April 26, 2006,

plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee or submit an in forma pauperis application. On May 3,

2006, plaintiff submitted an incomplete in forma pauperis application on a form he had been

instructed not to use. On May 30, 2006, plaintiff was granted thirty days to submit a properly

completed in forma pauperis application on the correct form. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure

to submit a properly completed application on the correct form will result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with court orders.

On June 8, 2006, plaintiff submitted an incomplete application dated June 5,

2006. It does not appear that the application was submitted in response to the court’s order

served May 30, 2006. The thirty-day period granted by that order has expired, and plaintiff has

Case 2:06-cv-00476-FCD-DAD Document 12 Filed 07/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

not complied with the court’s orders. This action should be dismissed with prejudice for failure

to comply with court orders. See Local Rule 11-110.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

with prejudice for failure to comply with court orders.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections

to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal

the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 11, 2006.

DAD:13

yona0476.fifp

Case 2:06-cv-00476-FCD-DAD Document 12 Filed 07/11/06 Page 2 of 2