Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01202/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01202-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY RICHARD LAWMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-01202-DMR 

ORDER TO SUBMIT FURTHER 

INFORMATION RE PLAINTIFF’S 

POLICE PRACTICES EXPERT

The reports of Plaintiff’s police practices expert, David Dusenbury, contain many 

references to Office of Citizen Complaints (“OCC”) materials. However, in Plaintiff’s motion in 

limine no. 6, Plaintiff takes the position that Dusenbury’s reliance on the OCC materials will be 

limited “to the extent [the materials] reveal that the SFPD either failed to advise the complainant 

he could arrange for blood-alcohol testing, or that requests to arrange for such tests were 

repeatedly refused by the SFPD, despite a stated SFPD policy to facilitate those tests when 

requested.” See Docket No. 137 at 2. Therefore, by no later than 12:00 p.m. on August 1, 2016, 

Plaintiff shall file a letter to the court confirming that Dusenbury’s testimony regarding the OCC 

materials will be limited to the subject matter described above. He shall also confirm that Plaintiff 

is withdrawing any other opinions by Dusenbury based on the OCC materials that are outside the 

scope of the subject matter described above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2016

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:15-cv-01202-DMR Document 212 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 1