Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01724/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01724-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TUVALU TUTNILA F.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1724 DFL KJM P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On December 23, 2004, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying

appointment of counsel and dismissing the complaint with leave to amend some claims, but

without leave to amend others. The order also directed plaintiff to limit his amended complaint

to twenty pages. On January 13, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, including the

motion for reconsideration, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s

ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 ////

////

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 32 Filed 09/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed December 23, 2004, is affirmed. 

DATED: 9/9/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 32 Filed 09/13/05 Page 2 of 2