Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05440/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05440-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CECIL A. VANN,

Plaintiff, CV F 04 5440 REC WMW P

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

R. RIMMER, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On March 25, 2005, the complaint

was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint and the

court recommended dismissal. Prior to the entry of the recommendation of dismissal, plaintiff

sought an extension of time to file an amended complaint. Accordingly the recommendation of

dismissal was vacated, and plaintiff was granted an extension of time to July 5, 2005, in which to

file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

Case 1:04-cv-05440-REC-WMW Document 18 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2005 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05440-REC-WMW Document 18 Filed 10/31/05 Page 2 of 2