Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02034/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02034-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2034

JULIA E. SOUTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF WARREN, a Political Subdivision of Virginia; 

WARREN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; BLAIR MITCHELL, Warren 

County Attorney; DAN WHITTEN, Assistant Warren County 

Attorney; ERIK MOORE, Warren County Zoning Administrator; 

DOUGLAS STANLEY, Warren County Executive/Administrator,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

JOHN KULNIS, Warren County Zoning Administrator,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, 

District Judge. (5:13-cv-00061-MFU-JGW)

Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julia E. Souter, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Kathleen Bardot, 

Julia Bougie Judkins, BANCROFT, MCGAVIN, HORVATH & JUDKINS, PC, 

Appeal: 14-2034 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/18/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2034 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/18/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Julia E. Souter appeals the district court’s order

denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking relief from the 

district court’s orders dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) 

action and denying her motion to amend the court’s judgment 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Souter v. Cnty. of 

Warren, No. 5:13-cv-00061-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. Aug. 28, 2014). We

deny Souter’s motion to appoint counsel, and dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-2034 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/18/2015 Pg: 3 of 3