Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01213/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01213-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD L. EVANS,1

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-1213 JAM GGH PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

By order filed November 5, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight 

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff 

of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff 

has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

 Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the reasons given 

in the November 5, 2015, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed 

with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

 

1

 Some of the filings refer to Christine Evans as a plaintiff; however, her name is crossed out on 

the signature line of the complaint and she has not signed the complaint. (ECF No. 1 at 23.) Nor 

has she signed the amended complaint. (ECF No. 15 at 12.) Therefore, this individual is not 

considered a party. 

Case 2:15-cv-01213-JAM-GGH Document 17 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: December 14, 2015 

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

GGH:076/Evans1213.fta 

Case 2:15-cv-01213-JAM-GGH Document 17 Filed 12/14/15 Page 2 of 2