Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-02276/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-02276-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Regional Chief Counsel

DANIEL P. TALBERT

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Social Security Administration

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8995

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER RODGERS,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANDREW SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

No. 2:19-cv-02276-DMC

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND 

FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT 

TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), 

AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN 

FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF

The parties stipulate by counsel that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of 

Social Security for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security 

Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four.

Upon remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to apply 

the regulations and rulings applicable for claims filed on or after May 27, 2017, including 20 

C.F.R. § 404.1520c; re-evaluate Plaintiff’s mental impairments in accordance with the special 

technique; re-evaluate Plaintiff’s alleged symptoms with specific citations to the record; reevaluate the opinion evidence of record; reassess Plaintiff’s maximum residual functional 

capacity; and, if warranted by the expanded record, obtain supplemental vocational expert 

Case 2:19-cv-02276-DMC Document 10 Filed 01/29/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

evidence to clarify the effect of the assessed limitations on Plaintiff’s ability to perform other 

work in the national economy.

The parties further stipulate that judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against 

Defendant.

Respectfully submitted January 21, 2020.

DATED: January 21, 2020 /s/ Shellie Lott

SHELLIE LOTT

(as authorized by email)

Attorney for Plaintiff

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

DATED: January 21, 2020 By s/ Daniel P. Talbert 

DANIEL P. TALBERT

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.

Dated: January 29, 2020

____________________________________

DENNIS M. COTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:19-cv-02276-DMC Document 10 Filed 01/29/20 Page 2 of 2