Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00213/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00213-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

Case No. 3:16-cv-00213-WHO Stipulation and Order Continuing 

CMC, Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, and 

Briefing Deadlines

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

L. TIMOTHY FISHER (CA SBN 191626)

ltfisher@bursor.com 

JULIA A. LUSTER (CA SBN 295031) 

jluster@bursor.com 

BURSOR & FISHER

1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: (925) 300-4455 

Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 

SCOTT A. BURSOR (CA SBN 276006) 

scott@bursor.com 

BURSOR & FISHER

888 Seventh Avenue 

New York, NY 10019 

Telephone: (925) 300-4455 

Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

TAMARA FIELDS, et al.

SETH P. WAXMAN (pro hac vice)

seth.waxman@wilmerhale.com

PATRICK J. CAROME (pro hac vice) 

patrick.carome@wilmerhale.com

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING

 HALE AND DORR LLP

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Telephone: (202) 663-6800 

Facsimile: (202) 663-6363 

MARK D. FLANAGAN (CA SBN 130303) 

mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING

 HALE AND DORR LLP

950 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 858-6000 

Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TWITTER, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

TAMARA FIELDS, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TWITTER, INC.

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:16-cv-00213-WHO

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 

HEARING ON TWITTER’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND 

BRIEFING DEADLINES

Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick

[N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 6-2] 

Case 3:16-cv-00213-WHO Document 30 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 4
Case No. 3:16-cv-00213-WHO 2 Stipulation and Order Continuing 

CMC, Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, and 

Briefing Deadlines 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Fields filed the present lawsuit on January 13, 2016 (Dkt. No. 1); 

WHEREAS, the Parties filed a Stipulation on February 3, 2016 for Defendant Twitter, Inc. 

(“Twitter”) to File its Response to the Complaint, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), which 

extended Twitter’s time to respond to the Complaint until March 10, 2016, and which did not require 

a Court order (Dkt. No. 17); 

WHEREAS, on March 10, 2016, Twitter filed its Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Dkt. No. 

20); 

WHEREAS, on March 24, 2016, Plaintiffs Fields, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) filed the Amended 

Complaint (Dkt. No. 21); 

WHEREAS, on April 5, 2016, the Parties filed the Joint Case Management Statement (Dkt. 

No. 25); 

WHEREAS, on April 6, 2016, the Parties filed a Joint Statement Regarding Twitter’s 

Request to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended 

Complaint (Dkt. No. 26); 

WHEREAS, also on April 6, 2016, Twitter filed its Motion to Dismiss the Amended 

Complaint (Dkt. No. 27); 

WHEREAS, on April 7, 2016, the Court entered an order granting Twitter’s Request to Stay 

Discovery Pending Resolution of Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint and 

continuing the Case Management Conference from April 12, 2016 until May 18, 2016, to be held in 

conjunction with the hearing on Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 28); 

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the 

Amended Complaint is April 20, 2016; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs have requested a two-week extension of time within which 

to file Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, such that 

Plaintiffs’ extended deadline would be May 4, 2016; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Twitter wish to accommodate Plaintiffs’ request for an extension 

but have several other obligations that would coincide with the adjusted deadline for Twitter’s Reply 

Case 3:16-cv-00213-WHO Document 30 Filed 04/11/16 Page 2 of 4
Case No. 3:16-cv-00213-WHO 3 Stipulation and Order Continuing 

CMC, Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, and 

Briefing Deadlines 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

in Support of Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint that would make preparation of 

Twitter’s Reply difficult absent an extension of time; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Twitter have accordingly requested a two-week extension of time 

within which to file Twitter’s Reply in Support of Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended 

Complaint, such that Twitter’s extended deadline would be May 25, 2016; 

WHEREAS, these extensions of time would require altering the date of the Case 

Management Conference and hearing on Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, such 

that the Conference and hearing would be held on June 15, 2016; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have consented to each of the requested two-week extensions, and 

have agreed that a corresponding 28-day continuance of the Case Management Conference and 

hearing on Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint would be appropriate and mutually 

convenient; 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the Parties hereby stipulate and 

agree, through their respective counsel, as follows: 

1. The May 18, 2016 Case Management Conference and hearing on Twitter’s Motion to 

Dismiss the Amended Complaint shall be rescheduled twenty-eight (28) days later on 

June 15, 2016, or on another date that is convenient for the Court. 

2. Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their Opposition to Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the 

Amended Complaint shall be extended by fourteen (14) days, to and including May 

4, 2016, and Twitter’s deadline to file a Reply in Support of Twitter’s Motion to 

Dismiss shall be extended to and including May 25, 2016. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

//

//

//

//

//

Case 3:16-cv-00213-WHO Document 30 Filed 04/11/16 Page 3 of 4
Case No. 3:16-cv-00213-WHO 4 Stipulation and Order Continuing 

CMC, Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, and 

Briefing Deadlines 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: April 8, 2016 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ L. Timothy Fisher

L. TIMOTHY FISHER (CA SBN 191626) 

ltfisher@bursor.com 

JULIA A. LUSTER (CA SBN 295031) 

jluster@bursor.com 

BURSOR & FISHER

1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: (925) 300-4455 

Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 

SCOTT A. BURSOR (CA SBN 276006) 

scott@bursor.com 

BURSOR & FISHER

888 Seventh Avenue 

New York, NY 10019 

Telephone: (925) 300-4455 

Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

TAMARA FIELDS, et al.

/s/ Seth P. Waxman

SETH P. WAXMAN (pro hac vice) 

seth.waxman@wilmerhale.com

PATRICK J. CAROME (pro hac vice) 

patrick.carome@wilmerhale.com

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING

 HALE AND DORR LLP

1875 Pennsylvania Avenue 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Telephone: (202) 663-6800 

Facsimile: (202) 663-6363 

MARK D. FLANAGAN (CA SBN 130303) 

mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING

 HALE AND DORR LLP

950 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 858-6000 

Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 

Attorneys for Defendant

TWITTER, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:____________ _________________________________________ 

 WILLIAM H. ORRICK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-00213-WHO Document 30 Filed 04/11/16 Page 4 of 4