Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04324/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04324-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

POLLACK SOLOMON DUFFY LLP

JOSHUA L. SOLOMON (admitted pro hac vice) 

133 Federal Street

Boston, MA 02110

Telephone: (617) 439-9800

Email: jsolomon@psdfirm.com

ROPES & GRAY LLP

ROCKY C. TSAI (CA Bar No. 221452)

Three Embarcadero Center, Ste. 300

San Francisco, CA 94111-4006

Telephone: (415) 315-6300

Facsimile: (415) 315-6350

Email: rocky.tsai@ropesgray.com

Attorneys for Defendant Late July Snacks LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MARY SWEARINGEN and ROBERT FIGY, 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LATE JULY SNACKS LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT LATE JULY SNACKS 

LLC TO RESPOND TO AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

Case 3:13-cv-04324-EMC Document 29 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 4
-1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ original complaint in the above-entitled action was served on 

Defendant Late July Snacks LLC (“Defendant”) on October 9, 2013;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendant previously agreed, by stipulation filed on October 

14, 2013, to extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 

November 29, 2013; 

WHEREAS, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint on November 27, 

2013;

WHEREAS, on November 27, 2013, the Court issued a notice setting the following 

dates: Plaintiffs’ reply to Defendant’s motion to dismiss due on December 18, 2013; hearing on 

motion to dismiss set for February 6, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.; Case Management Statement due by 

February 20, 2013; and Case Management Conference reset from January 2, 2013 to February 

27, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.; 

WHEREAS, on November 4, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a notice of intent to file an amended 

complaint (the “Amended Complaint”); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint on December 18, 2013, in lieu of 

a response to Defendant’s motion to dismiss;

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint is nearly three times as long as the original 

complaint and contains thirteen causes of action, in contrast to the original complaint’s two 

causes of action;

WHEREAS, in light of the expanded length and added legal complexity of the Amended 

Complaint, as well as the upcoming holidays and counsel’s pre-existing travel plans related to 

the holidays, Plaintiffs and Defendant have agreed to extend the time for Defendant to answer or 

otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint to February 3, 2014; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED pursuant to Civil 

Local Rule 6-1(a), by and between the parties to this action per their undersigned counsel, that 

the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is hereby 

extended to February 3, 2014. 

Case 3:13-cv-04324-EMC Document 29 Filed 01/02/14 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

-2-

Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: December 20, 2013 By: /s/ Rocky C. Tsai

Rocky C. Tsai 

Attorneys for Defendant

LATE JULY SNACKS LLC

Dated: December 20, 2013 By: /s/ Ben F. Pierce Gore

Ben F. Pierce Gore 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 3:13-cv-04324-EMC Document 29 Filed 01/02/14 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

-3-

Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________________ ______________________________

Honorable Edward M. Chen

U.S. District Court Judge 

1/2/14

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-04324-EMC Document 29 Filed 01/02/14 Page 4 of 4