Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00134/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00134-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD HAYES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES; CREDIT ONE 

BANK; and FISHES & LOAVES, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:19-cv-134-KJM-EFB PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

On February 6, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2).1

 The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, explained the 

deficiencies therein, and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to 

cure the deficiencies. ECF No. 3. The order warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended 

complaint could result in the dismissal of this action. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff 

has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.2

1

 This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 

undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

2

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, 

plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his 

current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record 

address of the party is fully effective. 

Case 2:19-cv-00134-KJM-EFB Document 4 Filed 03/31/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice 

for failure to state a claim as set forth in the February 6, 2020 order (ECF No. 3). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right 

to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: March 30, 2020. 

Case 2:19-cv-00134-KJM-EFB Document 4 Filed 03/31/20 Page 2 of 2