Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00916/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00916-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT E. GORDON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0916 GEB EFB P

vs.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

SACRAMENTO COUNTY,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. §

2254. On June 16, 2006, the court dismissed the petition, gave petitioner 30 days to file an

amended petition and directed petitioner either to file a completed application for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee. On July 26, 2006, and August 29, 2006, the

court granted petitioner’s requests for extensions of time until September 29, 2006, to comply

with the June 16, 2006, order. 

The time for complying with the order has passed and petitioner has not complied with

the order or responded to the order in any way. 

////

////

////

Case 2:06-cv-00916-JKS Document 13 Filed 10/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 17, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00916-JKS Document 13 Filed 10/18/06 Page 2 of 2