Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01789/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01789-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES

PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 273$

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -192)

On October 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for

the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 220 F.Supp.3d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,843 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have

been assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge Wolfson.Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of October 4, 2016, and, with the consent

of that court, assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is

pending at this time, the

stay is lifted. FOR THE PANEL:

Jan 13, 2020

CLERK’S OFFICE 

UNITED STATES

JUDICIAL PANEL ON

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

John W. Nichols

Clerk of the Panel

EBY CERTIFY that th above and is a true andoorrect copy

c the on i

in office.

D’RICT

C

WH..LIAM,Z • RK

/utCk
SCHEDULE CTO-192 -TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA CENTRAL

CAC 2 19—1082 1 Maria Morirnitsu v. Johnson & Johnson et al

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 1 19—0 1789 Blackmon v. Johnson & Johnson, et al.