Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02154/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02154-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD KIMBRO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MIRANDA, et al., 

Defendant. 

No. 2: 12-cv-2154 MCE KJN P 

ORDER 

 On October 13, 2015, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate 

judge’s order filed September 17, 2015 finding that a settlement conference would not 

be scheduled in this action.1 ECF No. 128. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a 

magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 

Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the 

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

 

1

 Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration does not contain a proof of service. However, plaintiff 

signed his motion on September 27, 2015. Giving plaintiff the benefit of the doubt, the 

undersigned finds that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is timely filed pursuant to the 

mailbox rule. 

Case 2:12-cv-02154-MCE-KJN Document 133 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the 

magistrate judge filed September 17, 2015 (ECF No. 124) is AFFIRMED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 9, 2015 

Case 2:12-cv-02154-MCE-KJN Document 133 Filed 11/10/15 Page 2 of 2