Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-mc-80059/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-mc-80059-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

Alan M. Mirman, Esq., State Bar No. 66883

Michael E. Bubman, Esq., State Bar No. 143468

Scott C. Timpe, Esq., State Bar No. 278529

MIRMAN, BUBMAN & NAHMIAS, LLP 

21860 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 360

Woodland Hills, California 91367

Telephone: (818) 451-4600

Facsimile: (818) 451-4620

Email: amirman@mbnlawyers.com mbubman@mbnlawyers.com stimpe@mbnlawyers.com

{00413187} 

3:16-mc-80059-EMC: Stipulation to continue Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 

Pursuant To FRCP Rule 59, or Alternatively, Relief From Judgment Pursuant to 

FRCP Rule 60; and Order thereon

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Attorneys for Respondent,

Associated Third Party Administrators

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RICHARD STIERWALT,

 Petitioner,

v.

ASSOCIATED THIRD PARTY 

ADMINISTRATORS, et al.

Respondent.

Case No. 3:16-mc-80059-EMC

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION OF 

ASSOCIATED THIRD PARTY 

ADMINISTRATORS TO ALTER, AMEND

AND/OR RECONSIDER JUDGMENT 

PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. RULE 59(e), OR IN 

THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR RELIEF FROM 

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. RULE 

60(b)(6);

DECLARATION OF ALAN M. MIRMAN RE 

SIGNATORY'S CONCURRENCE IN 

ELECTRONIC FILING;

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION

Petition Filed: April 20, 2016

Hearing: July 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.

Crtrm.: 5, 17th Floor

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

Respondent ASSOCIATED THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATORS ("ATPA") and Petitioner

RICHARD STEIRWALT ("Stierwalt"), through their respective counsel undersigned, stipulate as set 

forth herein:

RECITALS

A. On May 24, 2016, the Court entered in the above-captioned action its Order Re ThirdCase 3:16-mc-80059-EMC Document 34 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 3
{00413187} 2 

3:16-mc-80059-EMC: Stipulation to continue Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 

Pursuant To FRCP Rule 59, or Alternatively, Relief From Judgment Pursuant to 

FRCP Rule 60; and Order thereon

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Party Claim Of Security Interest (the "Original Order") [Docket No. 23] and a Judgment (the 

"Original Judgment") [Docket No. 24], adjudicating the third-party claim (the "Third-Party Claim") 

of CAMOFI Master LDC and CAMHZN Master LDC in favor of Stierwalt.

B. On May 25, 2016, the Court entered a Corrected Order Re Third-Party Claim Of 

Security Interest (the "Corrected Order") [Docket No. 25], and a corrected Judgment [Docket No. 26]

which referred to the Corrected Order instead of the Original Order as the basis therefor.

C. On June 22, 2016 ATPA filed a Motion to Alter, Amend and/or Reconsider Judgment 

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 59(e), or in the Alternative, for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 

Rule 60(b)(6) (the, "Motion") and set the hearing for its Motion for July 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.

D. Counsel for Stierwalt has advised counsel for ATPA that the former will be out of 

state on July 28, 2016 and has asked for a short continuance of the Court's hearing on the Motion to 

accommodate the travel schedule of counsel for Stierwalt, with no change in the parties' briefing 

schedule. Counsel for ATPA has agreed to the requested continuance.

STIPULATION

Based on the foregoing recitals, the parties through their respective counsel undersigned 

hereby stipulate to continue the hearing on ATPA's Motion to Alter, Amend, and/or reconsider 

Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 59(e), or in the Alternative, for Relief from Judgment Pursuant 

to F.R.C.P. Rule 60(b)(6) from July 28, 2016 to August 4, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. or soon thereafter as the 

Court may schedule per further conference between the Court, Stierwalt, and ATPA. The parties' 

briefing deadlines in connection with the Motion remain as currently scheduled.

Dated: July 6, 2016 DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP

By: /s/ Eric A. Handler_________________ 

Attorneys for Petitioner, Richard Stierwalt

Dated: July 6, 2016 MIRMAN, BUBMAN & NAHMIAS, LLP

By: /s/ Alan M. Mirman ________________ 

Attorneys for Respondent, Associated Third Party 

Administrators

Case 3:16-mc-80059-EMC Document 34 Filed 07/07/16 Page 2 of 3
{00413187} 3 

3:16-mc-80059-EMC: Stipulation to continue Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 

Pursuant To FRCP Rule 59, or Alternatively, Relief From Judgment Pursuant to 

FRCP Rule 60; and Order thereon

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF ALAN M. MIRMAN

I, Alan M. Mirman, declare:

1. I am an attorney at Mirman, Bubman & Nahmais, LLP, attorneys of record in the 

above-captioned action for respondent Associated Third Party Administrators. I am admitted to 

practice law before this Court. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein and if called 

as a witness could and would competently testify thereto.

2. This declaration is filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) in support of the parties'

stipulation set forth above (the "Stipulation").

3. I have obtained concurrence in the parties' filing of the Stipulation in this action from 

Eric A. Handler, one of the attorneys of record in this action for petitioner Richard Stierwalt, and Mr. 

Handler's electronic signature is given in the Stipulation in accordance with his concurrence.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United 

States of America that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration has been executed on 

July 6, 2016 in Woodland Hills, California.

/s/ Alan M. Mirman

Alan M. Mirman

ORDER

Based on the foregoing Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, it is 

hereby ordered that the Court's hearing on the Motion of Respondent Associated Third Party 

Administrators to Alter, Amend, and/or Reconsider Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 59(e), or in 

the Alternative, for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 60(b)(6) is continued from July 

28, 2016 to _____________________________ at _:__ _.m. The briefing deadlines remain as 

currently scheduled.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________________ ______________________________

Edward M. Chen, 

United States District Judge

August 4, 2016 1 30p 7/7/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-mc-80059-EMC Document 34 Filed 07/07/16 Page 3 of 3