Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03540/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03540-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

Stipulation on WRIT OF MANDAMUS Yassine v. Gonzalez c-06-3540 JSW 1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

LAW OFFICE OF RICCI & SPROULS 

Attorneys at Law 

445 Washington Street 

San Francisco, California 94111 

(415) 391 2100 

FAX (415) 391 4678 

FRANK P. SPROULS State Bar #166019 

Attorney for Petitioner 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

Petitioner, 

Mohammed Yasine 

v. 

ALBERTO GONZALEZ, ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES 

AND 

CHARLES De Moore, 

Acting District Director, 

San Francisco Office, U.S. 

BUREAU OF CITIZENSHIP AND 

IMMIGRATION SERVICES 

Respondents 

 

Stipulation to Hold 

Writ of Mandamus in 

abeyance pending renewed 

fingerprint check by 

Respondents 

C-06-3540 JSW 

 

1) Petitioner’s spouse was granted poltical asylum on July 

1, 2003. 

2) She filed an application with the Respondents on July 14, 

2003 to afford the Petitioner derivative asylee status. 

3) Nearly three years later, on June 2, 2006, Petitioner 

filed a writ of mandamus compelling the Respondents to 

adjudicate the above application. 

Case 3:06-cv-03540-JSW Document 10 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-03540-JSW Document 12 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 3
Stipulation on WRIT OF MANDAMUS Yassine v. Gonzalez c-06-3540 JSW 2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

4) A Joint Case Management Statement must be filed by 

09/28//06 with an Initial Case Management Conference set 

for 10/05/06. 

5) The Court issued an Order to Show Cause on July 26, 2006. 

The Government has responded to the OSC and the 

Petitioner’s response is due on 09/01/06. A hearing is set 

for 09/22/06 

6) In filing the Response, a dispute arose between the 

parties as to whether or not the Petitioner had his 

fingerprints taken on January 31 of this year. The 

background check is an essential predicate to the granting 

of the petition. 

7) The Respondents claim that he did not, the Petitioner 

claims that he did and that he provided a fingerprint 

receipt. 

8) In any event, the Respondents have agreed to provide the 

Petitioner with another appointment to have his prints 

taken. 

9) They aver that this is the final impediment to the 

resolution of the petition filed by Petitioner’s wife. 

10)In the interest of judicial economy the parties hereby 

stipulate and agree to hold this case in abeyance pending 

the resolution of the fingerprint check. 

Case 3:06-cv-03540-JSW Document 10 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-03540-JSW Document 12 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 3
Stipulation on WRIT OF MANDAMUS Yassine v. Gonzalez c-06-3540 JSW 3

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

11)We move to vacate the Petitioner’s response and the 

hearing on the Motion scheduled for 09/22/06 as well as 

the Case Management Conference and Status Report. 

12)The parties will provide the Court with a status report 

(90) ninety days from today's date on November 28, 06. 

13)If the matter is adjudicated prior to that date, 

Petitioner will voluntarily dismiss the writ. 

 

Dated:______________ 2006 

_________/s/_______________ ________/s/____________ 

Frank P. Sprouls Edward Olsen 

Attorney for Petitioner US Attorney 

______________________ 

US District Court Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-03540-JSW Document 10 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 3 of 4

September 1, 2006

Case 3:06-cv-03540-JSW Document 12 Filed 09/05/06 Page 3 of 3