Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01063/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01063-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGY

INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SYMANTEC CORPORATION,

Defendant /

No. C-09-1063 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF

DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On February 16, 2010, defendant electronically filed its Responsive Claim

Construction Brief. Thereafter, on February 17, 2010, defendant, on behalf of both parties,

electronically filed a proposed Stipulated Protective Order. In both instances, defendant

has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to

deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that

the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name,

case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also

Standing Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

Case 3:09-cv-01063-MMC Document 99 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

documents. Defendant is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each

electronically-filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01063-MMC Document 99 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 2