Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01033/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01033-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Kenneth G. Johnson,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 01-1033 FCD PAN P

vs. Order

Cal A. Terhune, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner without counsel prosecuting a

civil rights action. 

March 4, 2005, CDC defendants submitted personnel documents

for in camera review. Having reviewed the documents in light of

the pleading, the court finds they are not reasonably likely to

lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Good cause appearing, the court hereby orders that:

1. CDC defendants are not required to produce personnel

documents to plaintiff.

Case 2:01-cv-01033-FCD-EFB Document 215 Filed 06/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Plaintiff’s April 1 and May 9, 2005, requests for

sanctions for CDC defendants’ failure to submit documents for in

camera review are denied.

3. Plaintiff’s March 10 and 30, 2005, requests for

sanctions are denied because defendants’ April 12, 2005,

opposition shows plaintiff has received the $221.37 ordered and

delay in that regard was inadvertent.

4. Plaintiff’s April 1, 2005, request for an extension to

oppose summary judgment is granted and plaintiff’s May 13, 2005,

opposition is deemed timely. 

5. To challenge the sufficiency of defendants’ supplemental

responses to requests for production of documents (see April 1,

2005, request for sanctions), plaintiff may file and serve a

motion within ten days. The deadline for completing discovery is

extended for that sole purpose. If plaintiff serves and files

such a motion he may seek leave to supplement his opposition to

summary judgment to include materials yet to be produced.

6. CDC defendants shall not file or serve a reply to the

opposition to summary judgment until so directed by the court. 

Dated: June 7, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:01-cv-01033-FCD-EFB Document 215 Filed 06/08/05 Page 2 of 2