Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00595/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00595-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRYAN PATTERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE CITY OF VALLEJO CALIFORNIA, 

et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-0595 CKD P

ORDER &

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, commenced this action in March 2016. On March 29, 2016, the 

court ordered him to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee for this 

action. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4); 

however, it was incomplete. On April 11, 2016, the court directed him to file “a certified copy of 

his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the 

complaint and obtain[] the certification required” within thirty days, or face dismissal of this 

action. (ECF No. 5.) The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not submitted the 

required documents. Thus the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice.

////

////

Case 2:16-cv-00595-GEB-CKD Document 7 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to issue summons (ECF No. 6) is denied; and 

2. The Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 17, 2016

2 / patt0595.fifp

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-00595-GEB-CKD Document 7 Filed 05/17/16 Page 2 of 2