Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00496/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00496-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BETTS, RUBIN & McGUINNESS, A Professional Corporation

Attorneys at Law

907 Santa Fe Avenue, Suite 201

Fresno, California 93721

Telephone: (559) 438-8500

Facsimile: (559) 438-6959

Joseph D. Rubin (State Bar #149920)

Brady K. McGuinness (State Bar #172548)

Attorneys for Defendants Christine L. Tanner, Jerry W. Tanner, Shazad Bhai dba Z=s 

Smoke Shop, Hussain Kulsum dba Z=s Smoke Shop

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RONALD MOORE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHRISTINE L. TANNER; JERRY W. 

TANNER; SHAZAD BHAI dba Z=S SMOKE 

SHOP; HUSSAIN KULSUM dba Z=S 

SMOKE SHOP;

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 Case No. 1:15-CV-00496- SAB

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND THE TIME FORDEFENDANTS TO 

RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 

Complaint Served on: 4/10/2015

 

Case 1:15-cv-00496-SAB Document 11 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28  2 

Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants Christine L. Tanner, Jerry W. Tanner, 

Shazad Bhai dba Z=s Smoke Shop, Hussain Kulsum dba Z=s Smoke Shop, by and 

through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate to an extension of time so that 

Defendants shall have until June 30, 2015, to respond to the Complaint. 

Good cause exists for this extension because a Certified Access Specialist 

inspected the property in question on May 15, 2015, and the parties are in the process of 

reviewing the CASp Inspection Report, evaluating the alleged access barriers set forth in 

Plaintiff's Complaint, and discussing the possibility of an informal, global resolution of this 

dispute without the time and expense of further litigation. In particular, permitting this 

extension of time to respond to the Complaint will allow Defendants avoid the cost of 

preparing a formal response to the Complaint if the parties are able to resolve this dispute 

prior to June 30, 2015.

Dated: May 29, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

By /s/ Tanya E. Moore 

Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff, Ronald Moore

Dated: May 29, 2015 BETTS, RUBIN & McGUINNESS

By /s/ Brady K. McGuinness 

Brady K. McGuinness

Attorneys for Defendants Christine L. Tanner, 

Jerry W. Tanner, Shazad Bhai dba Z=s Smoke 

Shop, Hussain Kulsum dba Z=s Smoke Shop

Case 1:15-cv-00496-SAB Document 11 Filed 05/29/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28  3 

In accordance with the foregoing, the stipulation of the parties is approved.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 29, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00496-SAB Document 11 Filed 05/29/15 Page 3 of 3