Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01690/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01690-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

– 1 – 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT FROM JANUARY 7 UNTIL JANUARY 31, 2007

Case No: 2:05 CV-1690 LKK DAD

Kelli L. Taylor, SBN 186100 

John E. Spomer III, SBN 204938 

Tiffany L. King, SBN 221151 

BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC 

1415 L Street, Suite 1000 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: 916.930.2500 

Facsimile: 916.930.2501 

E-mail: kelli.taylor@bullivant.com

E-mail: john.spomer@bullivant.com

E-mail: tiffany.king@bullivant.com

Attorneys for Defendant, 

THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, 

erroneously sued herein as SHERWIN-WILLIAMS, 

INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ASUNCION LOPEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE CITY OF CHICO; SHERWINWILLIAMS, INC.; DOES 1 through 100, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No.: CIV-S-05-1690 LKK DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND TIME FOR HEARING ON 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

FROM JANUARY 7 UNTIL JANUARY 

31, 2007 

Pre-Trial Conf.: April 9, 2007 

Trial: August 14, 2007 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel, that the time for hearing Rule 56 Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication shall 

be briefly extended from the January 7, 2007 date specified in the scheduling order until January 

31, 2007. This extension is necessitated by the fact that when Sherwin-Williams went to file its 

Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication on November 22, 2006, it was advised that the 

soonest available January hearing date was January 16, 2007 and that the latest available 

December hearing date was December 11, 2006. 

Sherwin-Williams was diligent in its efforts to secure a hearing date and attempt to file 

its Motion well in advance of the January 7, 2007 specified completion date. Specifically, 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01690-LKK -DAD Document 20 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

– 2 – 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT FROM JANUARY 7 UNTIL JANUARY 31, 2007

Case No: 2:05 CV-1690 LKK DAD

discovery in this case closed on November 7, 2006 and Sherwin-Williams promptly prepared its 

Rule 56 Motion within the following two weeks so that it would be ready for filing on or before 

November 22, 2006, well in advance of the January 7th hearing deadline. Pursuant to the 

Court’s rules a hearing date is scheduled when the Motion is filed and cannot be reserved in 

advance. Sherwin-Williams was also previously unaware that hearings would not be conducted 

throughout the end of December or early January because of the holidays. 

No prejudice will result to the parties or the Court for this brief stipulated extension. 

Significantly, no other dates on the scheduling order need to be extended and the April 9, 2007 

Pre-Trial Conference and August 14, 2007 Trial dates will not be impacted. Additionally, no 

other dates in the scheduling order need to be extended. 

Sherwin-Williams is currently ready to file its Motion and thus, contingent upon the 

prompt execution and approval of this Stipulation, it should be able to obtain the January 16, 

2007 hearing date. Accordingly, this would result in merely a nine (9) day extension of the 

current January 7th deadline. Nonetheless, in an abundance of caution an extension until 

January 31st is requested in the event the January 16th hearing date is no longer available upon 

approval of this stipulation. 

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts and as executed shall constitute one 

stipulation that is binding on all parties hereto. The parties further stipulate that faxed 

signatures may be filed with the Court. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

DATED: November 27 , 2006 BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC 

By s/s Taylor

Kelli L. Taylor 

Attorneys for Defendant Sherwin-Williams 

Company, erroneously sued herein as SherwinWilliams Corp. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01690-LKK -DAD Document 20 Filed 11/29/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

– 3 – 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT FROM JANUARY 7 UNTIL JANUARY 31, 2007

Case No: 2:05 CV-1690 LKK DAD

DATED: November 27 , 2006 

By s/s Baumbach

Larry Baumbach 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 

DATED: November 27 , 2006 

By s/s Kilday

Bruce Kilday 

Attorney for defendant The City of Chico 

 

O R D E R

It is so ordered. 

DATED: November 28, 2006 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01690-LKK -DAD Document 20 Filed 11/29/06 Page 3 of 3