Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02652/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02652-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: RELATED CASES

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838 

E-MAIL: nlocker@wsgr.com 

STEVEN D. GUGGENHEIM., State Bar No. 201386 

E-MAIL: sguggenheim@wsgr.com 

CAZ HASHEMI, State Bar No. 210239 

E-MAIL: chashemi@wsgr.com 

DAVID A. MCCARTHY, State Bar No. 226415 

E-MAIL: dmccarthy@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Defendants 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC. and ANTONIO CANOVA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PRENA SMAJLAJ, Individually and On Behalf 

of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs.

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC., GREGORY L. REYES and ANTONIO 

CANOVA,

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:05-cv-2042 CRB 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING RELATED 

CASES
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: RELATED CASES

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 1 C:\NRPORTBL\PALIB1\VM3\2686325_1.DOC

WHEREAS, the Court entered an Order dated June 23, 2005 designating this action 

“related” under Local Rule 3-12 to numerous class actions and derivative actions filed in this 

District;

WHEREAS, there are other similar cases currently pending in this District; 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties to this stipulation agree, and the Court hereby orders, the 

following cases are also related to this action within the meaning of Local Rule 3-12: 

• Buddareddyhalli Sreenivas v. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., et al., No.

3:05-CV-02374 (Class Action); 

• Frederick Witt v. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., et al., No. 3:05-CV02692 (Class Action); 

• Najani K. Jha v. Gregory Reyes, et al., No. 3:05-CV-02652 (Derivative Action). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: July 8, 2005 Respectfully Submitted, 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/David A. McCarthy 

David A. McCarthy 

Attorneys for Defendants 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC. and ANTONIO CANOVA 

Dated: July 8, 2005 SCOTT & SCOTT 

Arthur L. Shingler, III 

401 B Street, Suite 307 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: (619) 233-4565 

Facsimile: (619) 233-0508 

By: /s/Arthur L. Shingler, III 

 Arthur L. Shingler, III 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BUDDAREDDYHALLI SREENIVAS 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: RELATED CASES

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 2 C:\NRPORTBL\PALIB1\VM3\2686325_1.DOC

Dated: July 8, 2005 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

Lee M. Gordon 

700 South Flower St., Suite 2940 

Los Angeles, CA 90017-4101 

Telephone: (213) 33-7150 

Facsimile: (213) 330-7152 

By: /s/Lee M. Gordon 

Lee M. Gordon 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

FREDERICK WITT 

Dated: July 8, 2005 MARY ALEXANDER & ASSOCIATES 

Mary E. Alexander 

 Gary W. Loftis 

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1303 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-4440 

Facsimile: (415) 433-5440 

By: /s/Mary E. Alexander 

 Mary E. Alexander 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NAJANI K. JHA 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: RELATED CASES

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 3 C:\NRPORTBL\PALIB1\VM3\2686325_1.DOC

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 

I, David A. McCarthy, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of 

the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 8th day of July 

2005 at Palo Alto, California. 

 /s/David A. McCarthy 

David A. McCarthy 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: RELATED CASES

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 4 C:\NRPORTBL\PALIB1\VM3\2686325_1.DOC

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Upon Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________________________

THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

July 21, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer