Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00960/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00960-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARNOLD J. FLEMING, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

ROSANNE FAUL, et al., ) 

 )

Defendants. )

)

 )

1: 05-CV-00960-AWI-SMS 

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH A COURT ORDER AND PROSECUTE

(DOC. 4)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with what

appears to be an action for damages and other relief concerning

alleged civil rights violations. The matter has been referred to

the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local

Rules 72-302 and 72-304.

On October 14, 2005, the Court filed findings and a

recommendation that the action be dismissed for Plaintiff’s

failure to comply with an order of the Court and for failing to

prosecute this action. The order was served on Plaintiff by mail

on the same date and contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days of the date of service of the order. No party has filed any

Case 1:05-cv-00960-AWI -SMS Document 5 Filed 12/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the report and recommendation are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation filed October 14, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The action IS DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to

follow an order of the Court and failure to prosecute; and

3. The Clerk of Court IS DIRECTED to close this action

because this order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 5, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00960-AWI -SMS Document 5 Filed 12/06/05 Page 2 of 2