Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05344/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05344-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

Case No. 14-cv-05344 BLF (NC) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ARISTA NETWORKS, INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 14-cv-05344 BLF (NC) 

ORDER ADVANCING BRIEFING 

ON ARISTA’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL DISCOVERY 

Re: Dkt. No. 278 

 Cisco must respond to Arista’s motion to compel discovery responses, Dkt. No. 

278, by 11:00 a.m. on June 16. The brief may not exceed five pages. Cisco must explain 

why I should not follow the approach of (former) Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal in 

granting an earlier Arista motion to compel in this case. Dkt. No. 83. No reply will be 

permitted without leave of court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 12, 2016 _____________________________________ 

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 300 Filed 06/12/16 Page 1 of 1