Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-02024/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-02024-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Liberty Life Insurance Company,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Eric LungMyers, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV 10-2024-PHX-JAT 

ORDER

 Pending before the Court is pro se Defendant Eric LungMyers’ (“Defendant”) 

Motion for Leave to provide the Court with an itemized list of items requiring redaction in 

Court docket documents 228 & 229. (Doc. 278). 

 Defendant wants to provide the Court with an itemized list of thirty-five items that 

Plaintiff did not redact in Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 228) and 

Plaintiff’s statement of facts in support of the motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 

229). On the same day that Defendant filed this pending motion, he filed an itemized list 

of the unredacted items in Plaintiff’s filings. (Doc. 279). 

 Prior to Defendant filing the pending motion, on April 19, 2012, Defendant filed a 

motion to strike (Doc. 245) Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and the 

statement of facts because Defendant accused Plaintiff of filing these motions without 

following the redaction requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. On February 

11, 2013, the Court entered orders granting Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary 

judgment in its entirety (Doc. 280) and denying Defendant’s motion to strike (Doc. 276). 

Case 2:10-cv-02024-JAT Document 295 Filed 09/17/13 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 -

On the same day, almost ten months after filing the motion to strike, Defendant filed the 

pending motion. 

 Defendant’s pending motion asks the Court for no more than permission to 

provide the Court with a list of items that Defendant believes Plaintiff should have 

redacted. To the extent that this is all Defendant’s motion is asking, the motion is granted. 

Defendant has provided the Court with such a list (Doc. 279). The Court has already 

denied Plaintiff’s motion to strike and explained the reasons for doing so. See (Doc. 276). 

 Based on the foregoing, 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Eric LungMyers Motion for Leave to Provide 

an Itemized List of Items Requiring Redaction (Doc. 278) is granted. The Clerk of the 

Court shall file the lodged proposed itemized list (Doc. 279); however, the Clerk of the 

Court need not take any further action on the list. 

 Dated this 17th day of September, 2013. 

Case 2:10-cv-02024-JAT Document 295 Filed 09/17/13 Page 2 of 2