Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01738/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01738-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-01-1738 GEB CMK P

vs.

MARGARITA PEREZ, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 16, 2005, plaintiff filed a “Motion Objecting to

Magistrate Judge Kellison’s Re-Screening of the Complaint. . . .” 

The court construes plaintiff’s motion as a request for

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed April 27,

2005, which vacated the findings and recommendations recommending

dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint and dismissed plaintiff’s

complaint with leave to amend. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-

303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the

entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

Case 2:01-cv-01738-GEB-CMK Document 70 Filed 06/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to

law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon

reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed

April 27, 2005, is affirmed. 

Dated: June 9, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:01-cv-01738-GEB-CMK Document 70 Filed 06/09/05 Page 2 of 2