Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-310/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING DISCOVERY TO OCCUR AFTER SEPTEMBER 5, 2014

Case No. 07-5944 SC

MDL No. 1917

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Richard Alan Arnold, Esquire

William J. Blechman, Esquire

Kevin J. Murray, Esquire

Samuel J. Randall, Esquire

KENNY NACHWALTER, P.A.

201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1100

Miami, Florida 33131

Tel: (305) 373-1000

Fax: (305) 372-1861

E-mail: rarnold@knpa.com

wblechman@knpa.com

kmurray@knpa.com

srandall@knpa.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case No. 07-5944 SC

MDL No. 1917

This Document Relates to: 

ALL DIRECT ACTION CASES

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING DISCOVERY TO 

OCCUR AFTER SEPTEMBER 5, 

2014

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2943 Filed 10/22/14 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING DISCOVERY TO OCCUR AFTER SEPTEMBER 5, 2014

Case No. 07-5944 SC

MDL No. 1917

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendants Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd., Hitachi Electronics Devices (USA) 

Inc., Hitachi Asia Ltd., and Hitachi Displays, Ltd., (collectively, “Hitachi”) and the Direct 

Action Plaintiffs1(the “DAPs”) have conferred by and through their counsel and, subject to 

the Court’s approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, September 5, 2014, was the deadline to complete fact discovery.

WHEREAS, on September 5, 2014, this Court approved a stipulation between the 

parties that extended the deadline for the DAPs to take a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Hitachi 

until October 17, 2014.

WHEREAS, the parties have continued to meet and confer to determine the scope and 

the date of a deposition. As part of that process, the DAPs submitted to Hitachi in writing the 

proposed questions that would be asked at the deposition, and Hitachi Ltd. has agreed to 

produce a witness for the deposition.

WHEREAS, due to scheduling conflicts between the witness and counsel, the parties 

were unable to find a date prior to October 17, 2014, on which to conduct the deposition. 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, to conduct the 

deposition on November 4, 2014, at 1:00 PM local time at Kirkland & Ellis LLP’s office in 

New York.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel of record, that: 

 

1 The Direction Action Plaintiffs are Electrograph Systems, Inc.; Electrograph Technologies, Corp.; Alfred H. 

Siegel (as trustee of the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust); Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy Purchasing LLC; 

Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.; Best Buy Stores, L.P.; BestBuy.com, L.L.C.; Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc.; Interbond 

Corporation of America; Office Depot, Inc.; Costco Wholesale Corporation; P.C. Richard & Son Long Island 

Corporation; ABC Appliance, Inc.; MARTA Cooperative of America, Inc.; Schultze Agency Services, LLC,

(on behalf of Tweeter Opco, LLC, and Tweeter Newco, LLC); Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corp.; Target 

Corp., Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc., Tech Data

Corporation, Tech Data Product Management, Inc., Dell Inc., and Dell Products L.P.

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2943 Filed 10/22/14 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING DISCOVERY TO OCCUR AFTER SEPTEMBER 5, 2014

Case No. 07-5944 SC

MDL No. 1917

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(1) the DAPs may conduct the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Hitachi Ltd. on November 4, 

2014.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:___________________ ___________________________________

Hon. Samuel Conti 

United States District Judge 

October 22, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2943 Filed 10/22/14 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING DISCOVERY TO OCCUR AFTER SEPTEMBER 5, 2014

Case No. 07-5944 SC

MDL No. 1917

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: October 10, 2014 By: /s/ Eliot Adelson

Eliot Adelson, Esq.

Counsel to Defendants Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi 

America, Ltd., Hitachi Electronics Devices 

(USA) Inc., Hitachi Asia Ltd., and Hitachi 

Displays, Ltd.

/s/Samuel J. Randall _________

Richard Alan Arnold, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)

William J. Blechman, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)

Kevin J. Murray, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)

Samuel J. Randall, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)

Kenny Nachwalter, P.A.

201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1100

Miami, Florida 33131

Tel: (305) 373-1000

Fax: (305) 372-1861

E-mail: rarnold@knpa.com

wblechman@knpa.com

kmurray@knpa.com

srandall@knpa.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co.

and Kmart Corporation

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2943 Filed 10/22/14 Page 4 of 4