Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01064/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01064-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Tony Hernandez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 4, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation 

recommending denial of Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 62.) The Findings and 

Recommendation contained notice that objections were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day 

time frame has expired and no objections were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

///

TONY HERNANDEZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

A. MARTINEZ,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01064-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[ECF Nos. 49, 62]

Case 1:10-cv-01064-SAB Document 67 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on December 4, 2015, is adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 16, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01064-SAB Document 67 Filed 01/19/16 Page 2 of 2