Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-05696/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-05696-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:17íCVí05696íRS 1

STIPULATION OF 14-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Geri N. Kahn (State Bar Number 148536) 

geri@gerinkahn.com 

Law Office of Geri N. Kahn 

465 California Street, Suite 609 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 397-5446 

(800) 375-5956 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Joey Chan Ma, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social 

Security, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 3:17íCVí05696íRS

Stipulation of 14-Day Extension of Time for 

Plaintiff to file brief in support of Motion for 

Summary Judgment; [Proposed] Order 

Plaintiff, by and through her attorney of record, and Defendant, by and through her attorney of 

record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 14-day extension of time for Plaintiff’s 

counsel to file a brief in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment, in light of the following: 

1. Counsel for Plaintiff had a family emergency arise last week which caused her to be out of 

the office all week. Counsel does not anticipate needing to ask for further extensions in 

this case. 

2. Plaintiff’s counsel has emailed Francesco Benavides, Esq., defendant’s counsel. Mr. 

Benavides has indicated that he is agreeable to a 14- day extension of time for counsel to 

prepare her brief. 

Case 3:17-cv-05696-RS Document 14 Filed 07/09/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:17íCVí05696íRS 2

STIPULATION OF 14-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

3. Should the request be granted, Plaintiff’s brief will be due on July 24, 2018, Defendant’s 

reply brief on August 23, 2018, and Plaintiff’s optional response brief on September 6, 

2018. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: July 9, 2018 /s/ Geri N. Kahn 

 GERI N. KAHN 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: July 9, 2018 /s/ Francesco Benavides 

 FRANCESCO BENAVIDES 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 (*By email authorization on July 9, 2018) 

ORDER 

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 

 Richard Seeborg 

 United States District Judge 

7/9/18

Case 3:17-cv-05696-RS Document 14 Filed 07/09/18 Page 2 of 2