Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-05468/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-05468-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934

---

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE; and ORDER (Proposed) 

CASE NO. 4:08-cv-05468 CW 

PAGE 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 VS. 

HECTOR ANTONIO ORELLANA , et al. 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 4:08-cv-05468-CW 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ADR 

DEADLINE; and ORDER 

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT: 

 By and through their counsel, Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc., and Defendants 

Hector Antonio Orellana, Oscar A. Orellana, and 1 Production SF, LLC hereby agree, stipulate, and 

respectfully request that this Honorable Court continue the ADR deadline in the above-entitled 

action from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2010. 

The brief extension of time to continue the ADR deadline is mutually requested by the 

Parties for the following reasons: 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706 

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. 

First Library Square 

1114 Fremont Avenue 

South Pasadena, CA 91030-3227 

Tel: 626-799-9797 

Fax: 626-799-9795 

TPRLAW@att.net 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. 

Case 4:08-cv-05468-CW Document 32 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE; and ORDER (Proposed) 

CASE NO. 4:08-cv-05468 CW 

PAGE 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Plaintiff’s counsel and defense counsel have been working together and 

actively discussing resolving this lawsuit short of trial. Counsel for the Parties are most confident 

that they will be able to reach a settlement of all claims involved in this action independent of any 

intervention that may be necessary by this Honorable Court. 

2. In the unlikely event that the Parties’ attempts to reach a settlement are 

unsuccessful, Plaintiff’s counsel and defense counsel are working together to reset depositions for 

mutually convenient dates later this month. The Parties believe that for any ADR to be successful, 

the depositions contemplated would need to be conducted as they will reach core issues central to 

the Parties’ legal positions at this time. 

 WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED 

BY THE PARTIES that this Honorable Court continue the ADR deadline in this action pursuant to 

the Proposed Order attached hereto.

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: February 10, 2010 /s/ Thomas P. Riley 

 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. 

 By: Thomas P. Riley 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

J & J Sports Productions, Inc. 

Dated: February , 2010 

TINGLEY, PIONTKOWSKI, LLP 

 By: Bruce C. Piontkowski 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 Hector Antonio Orellana, Oscar A. Orellana 

 and 1 Production SF, LLC 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 4:08-cv-05468-CW Document 32 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE; and ORDER (Proposed) 

CASE NO. 4:08-cv-05468 CW 

PAGE 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 

IT IS HEREBY ordered that the ADR deadline in the above-entitled action is hereby 

continued from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

 2/12/10 

__________________________________ Dated: 

Honorable Claudia Wilken 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California

Case 4:08-cv-05468-CW Document 32 Filed 02/12/10 Page 3 of 3