Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-01890/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-01890-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\BTM\10cv1890-Ext SAC #3.wpd -1- 10cv1890 BTM (BGS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN WOODALL,

CDCR #F-91270,

Civil No. 10cv1890 BTM (BGS)

Plaintiff, ORDER

(1) DENYING MOTION TO

REOPEN CASE; 

(2) GRANTING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

(3) GRANTING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE EXCESS PAGES;

AND 

(4) DENYING MOTION FOR COPY

OF FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

 [ECF Nos. 21-24]

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 

Defendants.

On May 16, 2011, this Court granted Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file

his Second Amended Complaint. See May 16, 2011 Order at 2. That Order was returned to the

Court as “undeliverable” with the notation that Plaintiff had been paroled [ECF No. 18].

Plaintiff has now filed four additional motions including: (1) Motion to Reopen Case Pursuant

Case 3:10-cv-01890-BTM-BGS Document 25 Filed 07/08/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\BTM\10cv1890-Ext SAC #3.wpd -2- 10cv1890 BTM (BGS)

to Rule 15(c)(2) or 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (2) Motion for Enlargement

of Time to File Second Amended Complaint; (3) Motion for Permission to Exceed Page

Limitation; and (4) Motion for Order Directing Clerk of Court to Send Plaintiff a Copy of his

First Amended Complaint. In these Motions Plaintiff indicates that his parole has been revoked

again and he is currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility.

First, Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen the case is DENIED as moot. No judgment has been

entered in this matter and the case will proceed once Plaintiff files his Second Amended

Complaint. Second, because it appears that Plaintiff did not receive the Court’s May 16, 2011

Order, Plaintiff’s Motion for an Extension of Time to File his Second Amended Complaint is

GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of the Court’s May 16, 2011

Order. The Court will provide Plaintiff an additional sixty (60) days from the date this Order

is “Filed” to submit his Second Amended Complaint. In addition, Plaintiff’s Motion for

Permission to Exceed Page Limitation is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint

is not to exceed fifty (50) pages. Finally, Plaintiff’s Motion for a Copy of his First Amended

Complaint is DENIED. This request is denied as Plaintiff has no constitutional right to free

photocopying services. See Sands v. Lewis, 886 F.2d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1990) (per curiam).

As the Court stated in the May 16, 2011 Order, Plaintiff may contact the Clerk of Court to

arrange for a copy at the standard rate of $0.50 per page.

The Court cautions that if Plaintiff continues to fail to apprise the Court of his current

address, this action may be subject to dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See

SD CIVLR 83.11(b). Plaintiff is also reminded that he must correct all the deficiencies of

pleading noted in the Court’s March 9, 2011 Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 8, 2011

Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-01890-BTM-BGS Document 25 Filed 07/08/11 Page 2 of 2