Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04615/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04615-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE

HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. C05-04615 JF (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Katherine D. Prescott (CSB No. 215496/prescott@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello St., Suite 500

Redwood City, CA 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Nagendra Setty (Admitted Pro Hac Vice/setty@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

1230 Peachtree Street, 19th Floor 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309 

Telephone: (404) 892-5005

Facsimile: (404) 892-5002

Attorneys for Plaintiff

AIRDEFENSE, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN JOSE DIVISION)

AIRDEFENSE, INC., a Georgia corporation,

 Plaintiff,

v.

AIRTIGHT NETWORKS, INC.,

 Defendant.

Case No. C05-04615 JF (HRL)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO RESCHEDULE HEARING 

ON MOTION TO DISMISS 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN the parties and their respective 

counsel that, subject to the approval of this Court, the Hearing on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss 

Complaint currently scheduled for February 10, 2006, 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable Jeremy 

Fogel be continued to April 28, 2006 at 9:00 a.m.

Dated: January 26, 2006

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Katherine D. Prescott___________ 

 Katherine D. Prescott

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 AIRDEFENSE, INC.

Dated: January 26, 2006

WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH, & ROSATI

By: ____/s/ Tait Graves_____________________

 Tait Graves

 Attorneys for Defendant

 AIRTIGHT NETWORK, INC.

**E-filed 1/30/06**

Case 5:05-cv-04615-JF Document 21 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 2
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE

HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. C05-04615 JF (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel

United States District Court Judge

DECLARATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Tait 

Graves. 

Dated: January 26, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Katherine D. Prescott

Katherine D. Prescott

Attorneys for Plaintiff

AIRDEFENSE, INC.

50325919

1/30/06

Case 5:05-cv-04615-JF Document 21 Filed 01/30/06 Page 2 of 2