Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02296/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02296-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 423
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2296

In Re: CHRISTIE M. ADEMILUYI,

Debtor.

-----------------------------

CHRISTIE M. ADEMILUYI,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CITIMORTGAGE, INCORPORATED; PENNYMAC HOLDINGS, LLC, f/k/a 

PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings, I LLC, by 

PennyMac Loan Services, LLC its servicing agent; PENNYMAC 

CORP., by PennyMac Loan Services, LLC its servicing agent; 

PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC,

Defendants – Appellees,

TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN,

Trustee - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (8:15-cv-00777-JFM; 14-00806)

Submitted: March 28, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 15-2296 Doc: 29 Filed: 04/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

April T. Ademiluyi, LAW OFFICE OF APRIL T. ADEMILUYI, Bethesda, 

Maryland, for Appellant. Robert A. Scott, BALLARD SPAHR LLP, 

Baltimore, Maryland; John Lucian, BLANK ROME LLP, Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2296 Doc: 29 Filed: 04/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Christie M. Ademiluyi appeals from the district court’s 

orders dismissing her complaint for failure to state a claim, 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), because, among other things, she 

lacked standing to challenge the transfer of her mortgage note. 

She also appeals from the district court’s order denying her 

motion for leave to amend her complaint. The court determined 

that, because she lacked standing, amendment would be futile. 

We have reviewed the record and the arguments presented on 

appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Ademiluyi v. Citimortgage, Inc., No. 8:15-cv-00777-JFM (D. Md. 

Sept. 29, 2015 & Oct. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-2296 Doc: 29 Filed: 04/01/2016 Pg: 3 of 3