Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235-49/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

[PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C 09-5235-MMC (MEJ) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation, FAIRCHILD 

SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a 

Delaware Corporation, and SYSTEM 

GENERAL CORPORATION, a Taiwanese 

corporation, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 09-5235-MMC (MEJ) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING POWER 

INTEGRATIONS’ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

Fairchild requests the following documents be placed under seal: 

• The redacted portions of Power Integrations’ Opposition to Fairchild’s Motion to Exclude 

the Opinions and Testimony of Jonathan D. Putnam ; 

• Exhibits 1 and 5to the Declaration of Michael R. Headley in Support of Power 

Integrations’ Opposition to Fairchild’s Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of 

Jonathan D. Putnam; 

• The redacted portions of Power Integrations’ Opposition to Fairchild’s Motion to Strike 

Portions of Dr. Kelley’s Infringement Report; 

In response to Plaintiff's motions filed October 11, 2013 (Dkt. Nos. 275, 276, 278), Defendants ^

IN PART

 ; 

DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 314 Filed 11/04/13 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER - 2 - Case No. C 09-5235-MMC (MEJ) 

• Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11, and 14to the Declaration of Michael R. Headley in Support of 

Power Integrations’ Opposition to Fairchild’s Motion to Strike Portions of Dr. Kelley’s 

Infringement Report; 

• The redacted portions of Power Integrations’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment; and 

• Exhibits 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10 to the Declaration of Michael R. Headley in Support of 

Power Integrations’ Opposition to Fairchild’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 

The Court, having considered this request and the papers submitted in support of this 

request, finds good cause to maintain the confidentiality of these documents and hereby 

GRANTS Defendants’ Motion. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the documents and redactions enumerated above shall 

be sealed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 request to the extent it pertains to the above-referenced material. 

To the extent plaintiff seeks to file under seal Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Michael R. Headley 

in Support of Power Integrations’ Opposition to Fairchild’s Motion to Strike and Exhibits 2, 3, 9, 

15, and 17 to the Declaration of Michael R. Headley in Support of Power Integrations’ 

Opposition to Fairchild’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff's administrative motions are 

hereby DENIED, for the reason that Defendants do not contend the material is sealable, and, 

accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to file said documents in the public record no later 

than November 8, 2013.

November 4, 2013

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 314 Filed 11/04/13 Page 2 of 2