Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04525/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04525-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO 05 4525 EMC

Amanda J. Gallagher (pro hac vice)

Thomas A. McGrath (pro hac vice)

Brenda D. DiLuigi (pro hac vice)

LINKLATERS

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10105

Phone: (212) 903-9000

Fax: (212) 903-9100

amanda.gallagher@linklaters.com

thomas.mcgrath@linklaters.com

brenda.diluigi@linklaters.com

Jerome B. Falk, Jr. (State Bar No. 39087)

Dirk M. Schenkkan (State Bar No. 72533)

HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKIN,

A Professional Corporation

Three Embarcadero Center

Seventh Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4024

Phone: (415) 434-1600

Fax: (415) 217-5910

jfalk@howardrice.com

dschenkkan@howardrice.com

Attorneys for Defendants Richemont North America, Inc.

and Cartier International

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ANDRÉ FLEURY, d/b/a SWISS WATCH

CO., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CARTIER INTERNATIONAL, a French

company, and RICHEMONT NORTH

AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation

and successor to Cartier, Inc.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C-05-4525 EMC

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST

AMENDED CLASS ACTION

COMPLAINT

Case 3:05-cv-04525-EMC Document 43-1 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 1 of 3

; ORDER

Case 3:05-cv-04525-EMC Document 44 Filed 05/25/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO 05 4525 EMC

2

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), the parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby

stipulate to extend the time for Defendants Cartier International and Richemont North America,

Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Class Action Complaint to and

including June 7, 2006.

DATED this _____ day of May, 2006.

Amanda J. Gallagher (pro hac vice)

Thomas A. McGrath (pro hac vice)

Brenda D. DiLuigi (pro hac vice)

LINKLATERS

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10105

Jerome B. Falk, Jr. (State Bar No. 39087)

Dirk M. Schenkkan (State Bar No. 72533)

HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKIN,

A Professional Corporation

Three Embarcadero Center

Seventh Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4024

By________________________/s/____________________________

Counsel for Defendants Richemont North America, Inc.

and Cartier International

Case 3:05-cv-04525-EMC Document 43-1 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-04525-EMC Document 44 Filed 05/25/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO 05 4525 EMC

3

DATED this _____ day of May, 2006.

Bruce L. Simon (State Bar No. 96241)

Esther L. Klisura (State Bar No. 221171)

COTCHETT, PITRE, SIMON & McCARTHY

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200

Burlingame, CA 94010

Geoffrey Spellberg (State Bar No. 121079)

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON

50 California Street, Suite 3050

San Francisco, CA 94111

By_________________________/s/___________________________

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 3:05-cv-04525-EMC Document 43-1 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 3 of 3

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

_________________ 

Edward M. Chen 

U.S. Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Date: May 25, 2006

Case 3:05-cv-04525-EMC Document 44 Filed 05/25/06 Page 3 of 3