Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01620/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01620-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RALPH CERVANTES,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1620 DFL GGH P

vs.

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On March 7, 2006, petitioner was granted a thirty day period to file an application

for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2254, or a civil rights action, under 42

U.S.C. Section 1983. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an

application for writ of habeas corpus, a civil rights action, or otherwise responded to the court’s

order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 

See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

Case 2:05-cv-01620-DFL-GGH Document 12 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 6/8/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

cerv1620.ord3

Case 2:05-cv-01620-DFL-GGH Document 12 Filed 06/08/06 Page 2 of 2