Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05169/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05169-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Stip and Prop. Order Continuing CMC

Taylor v. City of Oakland, et al. C06-05169 WHA 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JAMES B. CHANIN (SBN# 76043)

JULIE M. HOUK (SBN# 114968)

LAW OFFICES OF JAMES B. CHANIN

3050 Shattuck Avenue

Berkeley, California 94705

Telephone: (510) 848-4752, Ext. 2

Facsimile: (510) 848-5819

Email: jbcofc@aol.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SUE ROSANNE TAYLOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUE ROSANNE TAYLOR,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF OAKLAND; DAVID LARSON;

DOES 1-20,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: C06-05169 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

)

WHEREAS, the Court continued the Case Management Conference from November 30,

2006, to December 7, 2006;

WHEREAS, plaintiff’s counsel has a pre-existing scheduling conflict on December 7,

2006,

WHEREAS, the first Thursday thereafter that all counsel are available for a Case

Management Conference is January 4, 2007 at 11:00 a.m.,

WHEREAS, counsel for defendant DAVID LARSON was recently retained and requests

additional time to prepare for the Case Management Conference, and,

Case 3:06-cv-05169-WHA Document 12 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 2
Stip and Prop. Order Continuing CMC

Taylor v. City of Oakland, et al. C06-05169 WHA 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, no previous request for a continuance of the Case Management Conference

have been made by any party,

THE PARTIES DO HEREBY AGREE, STIPULATE AND RESPECTFULLY

REQUEST THAT the Case Management Conference in the above-entitled action be continued to

January 4, 2007, at 11:00 a.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: November 18, 2006 ___________/s/________________

JAMES B. CHANIN

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: November 20 2006 _________/s/__________________

ARLENE M. ROSEN

Attorney for Defendant

City of Oakland

Dated: November 17, 2006 ________/s/___________________

MICHAEL S. TREPPA

Attorney for Defendant

David Larson

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: November ___, 2006 ______________________________

WILLIAM H. ALSUP

Judge of the United States

District Court

29 There will be no further continuances.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:06-cv-05169-WHA Document 12 Filed 11/29/06 Page 2 of 2