Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00886/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00886-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Defendant was erroneously sued as The Travelers' Indemnity Company of Rhode Island.

ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE—C-04-00886 RMW

MAG

E-FILED on 9/29/05

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ROYAL INDEMNITY GROUP, THE

GREYSTONE GROUP, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY

OF RHODE ISLAND, STEDMAN

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DOES 1-100,

Defendants.

No. C-04-00886 RMW

ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER 30, 2005

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

[Re Docket No. 91]

On September 20, 2005 plaintiffs Royal Indemnity Group ("Royal") and Greystone Group, Inc.

("Greystone") and defendant Travelers' Indemnity Company of Connecticut1 ("Travelers") submitted a joint

request to vacate the case management conference currently scheduled for September 30, 2005. The

purpose of the case management conference was to discuss a new trial schedule for this action, as the

previously-scheduled trial date was vacated by the court at the parties’ request pending resolution of their

cross-motions for summary judgment. 

The court has now issued an order on the parties’ cross-motions. Both plaintiffs and defendant

have filed motions for leave to reconsider separate portions of the court’s order regarding the crossCase 5:04-cv-00886-RMW Document 92 Filed 09/29/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE—C-04-00886 RMW

MAG 2

motions for summary judgment. Until the court rules on the motions and resolves the issues raised therein,

the parties believe that case management conference to discuss the trial date would be premature. 

Furthermore, plaintiffs anticipate moving for leave to file an amended complaint to clarify and simplify their

pleadings.

To address the parties’ concerns, the court vacates the September 30, 2005 case management

conference date. It will reset the case management conference in an appropriate order regarding the

reconsideration requests. 

DATED: 9/26/05 /s/ Ronald M. Whyte

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:04-cv-00886-RMW Document 92 Filed 09/29/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE—C-04-00886 RMW

MAG 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff(s):

Michael Mathews mathewsesq@earthlink.net 

Counsel for Defendant(s):

David Hungerford dhungerford@morison-knox.com 

Michael D. Prough mdp@morison-knox.com 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for

e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 9/29/05 /s/ MAG

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:04-cv-00886-RMW Document 92 Filed 09/29/05 Page 3 of 3