Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00916/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00916-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELONZA JESSE TYLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. SMITH, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00916-OWW-SMS PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF

MAY BE GRANTED

(Doc. 14) 

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL COUNTS AS A

STRIKE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G)

Plaintiff Elonza Jesse Tyler (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On February 22, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein

which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the

Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Objection to the

Findings and Recommendations on March 20, 2007.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

Case 1:05-cv-00916-OWW -SMS Document 16 Filed 03/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 22, 2007, is adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state any claims upon which

relief may be granted; and

3. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 26, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00916-OWW -SMS Document 16 Filed 03/27/07 Page 2 of 2