Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03522/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03522-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

Case No. C05-3522 CW STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

Mark A. Flagel (Bar No. 110635) 

Robert Steinberg (Bar No. 126407) 

John D. Minton (Bar No. 223823) 

140 Scott Drive 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 328-4600 

Facsimile: (650) 463-2600 

Email: mark.flagel@lw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. 

SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P. 

 Nathan Lane, III (Bar No. 50961) 

 Joseph A. Meckes (Bar No. 190279) 

One Maritime Plaza, Suite 300 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 954-0200 

Facsimile: (415) 393-9887 

Email: nlane@ssd.com 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

TAIWAN SUMIDA ELECTRONICS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

TAIWAN SUMIDA ELECTRONICS, INC., 

a Taiwan corporation, 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 05-3522 CW 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [ORDER 

Date: n/a 

Courtroom: 2 

Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

Case 4:05-cv-03522-CW Document 128 Filed 11/01/07 Page 1 of 2
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

Case No. C05-3522 CW

1

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION

 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim Defendant Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Defendant and Counterclaimant 

Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc., through the signature of their counsel, stipulate herein to 

dismiss this action with prejudice, including all claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses 

between Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc. The Court shall 

retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement agreement entered into between the 

parties. 

Dated: October 31, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

By: /s/ 

Mark A. Flagel 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. 

Dated: October 31, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P. 

By: /s/ 

Nathan Lane III 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

TAIWAN SUMIDA ELECTRONICS, INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 11/1/07 

Dated: ________________ __________________________________________ 

Claudia Wilken 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:05-cv-03522-CW Document 128 Filed 11/01/07 Page 2 of 2