Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01511/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01511-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENTE SOLOMON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CARRASCO, et al,

Defendants.

1:11-cv-01511-LJO-SKO (PC)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

(Doc. 36, 42, 51)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

' 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s amended complaint against Defendants Carrasco 

and Dailo (“Defendants”) for depriving Plaintiff of outdoor exercise, in violation of the Eighth 

Amendment of the United States Constitution. 

On July 22, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment which included notice

to Plaintiff of the requirements to oppose the motion. (Doc. 36.) Despite requesting and 

receiving two sixty (60) day extensions of time (Docs. 42, 51), Plaintiff has not filed an 

opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion despite lapse of the requisite time. 

Local Rule 230(l). 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion 

within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order;1and

 

1 A Second Informational Order which identifies the requirements to oppose a motion for summary judgment is 

Case 1:11-cv-01511-LJO-SKO Document 55 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result 

dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 12, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

concurrently issued herewith.

Case 1:11-cv-01511-LJO-SKO Document 55 Filed 01/12/16 Page 2 of 2