Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00656/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00656-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Parnell Curtis is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

1983.

This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on August 12, 2014, 

against Defendants J.G. Garcia, R.F. Tablas, R.W. Catlin, D.M. Coontz, Camacho/Camario, Mendoza, 

L. Escalante, and I.M. Vera for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and against 

Defendants J.G. Garcia and R.F. Tablas for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. 

After a second attempt to serve Defendant Camario, previously identified by Plaintiff as 

Camacho, the United States marshal was not able to locate or identify Camario and service was 

returned un-executed on September 21, 2015. 

On September 22, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause within thirty days why 

Defendant Camario should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

PARNELL CURTIS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00656-AWI-SAB (PC)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT CAMARIO PURSUANT TO 

RULE 4(M) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE

[ECF Nos. 55, 56]

Case 1:14-cv-00656-AWI-SAB Document 61 Filed 11/19/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Procedure. (ECF No. 56.) The thirty day time frame has passed and Plaintiff has failed to respond to 

the order to show cause. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Defendant Camario be DISMISSED from 

the action pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

This Findings and Recommendation will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one (21)

days after being served with this Findings and Recommendation, the parties may file written 

objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendation.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-

39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 19, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00656-AWI-SAB Document 61 Filed 11/19/15 Page 2 of 2