Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02058/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02058-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH TREJO, on behalf of himself, CASE NO. 15-CV-02058-HSG

all others similarly situated, and the

general public,

Plaintiff(s), 

 

v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

SIMMONS BEDDING COMPANY,

LLC, a Delaware limited Liability

Corporation; and DOES 1-50 inclusive,

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

☐ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process:

 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediation with Jeffrey A.

Ross, Oakland, CA 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

 other requested deadline: March 2016

Dated: July 31, 2015 /s/ Shaun Setareh

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: July 31, 2015 /s/ Ellen Connelly Cohen

Attorney for Defendant

The filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other 

signatory.

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case 4:15-cv-02058-HSG Document 16 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER

☐ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

☐ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11

Page 2 of 2

DISTRICT 7/31/2015 X

Case 4:15-cv-02058-HSG Document 16 Filed 07/31/15 Page 2 of 2