Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03058/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03058-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1145 E.R.I.S.A.

---

-1- 

PLAINTIFFS’ CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STAEMENT AND (PROPOSED) ORDER [CASE NO. C-06-3058 CW (EMC)] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

James P. Watson, (SBN 46127) 

Bruce K. Leigh (SBN 129753) 

Anne Bevington (SBN 111320) 

STANTON, KAY & WATSON, LLP 

101 New Montgomery, Fifth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 512-3501 

Facsimile: (415) 512-3515 

Email: AnneB@skwsf.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND COURT HOUSE 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS 

HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS VACATIONHOLIDAY TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; and BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS TRAINING 

AND RETRAINING TRUST FUND FOR 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

CANYON SPRINGS ENTERPRISES dba RSH 

CONSTRUCTION, a Business Entity; ROBERT 

STANLEY HAMILTON, an Individual, 

GREGORY MAX CHEHEY, an Individual, and 

ROBERT KEITH CLARK, an Individual, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: C-06-3058 CW (EMC)

PLAINTIFFS’ CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE STATEMENT; 

ORDER 

DATE: Dec. 1, 2006 

TIME: 1:30 p.m. 

CTRM: 2, 4th Floor (Oakland) 

JUDGE: Hon. Claudia Wilken

This is an action by trustees of the Laborers Trust Funds against employer Canyon Springs 

Enterprises dba RSH Construction and its principals to recover unpaid contributions due pursuant to a 

collective bargaining agreement. The parties have agreed to settle the matter with the settlement 

payment to be made no later than December 20, 2006, and the settlement documents are being 

prepared. Accordingly, plaintiffs do not anticipate any need to set the matter for trial at this time and 

Case 4:06-cv-03058-CW Document 17 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 3
 -2- 

PLAINTIFFS’ CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STAEMENT AND (PROPOSED) ORDER [CASE NO. C-06-3058 CW (EMC)] 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

request that the court continue the Case Management Conference for a date in approximately 60 days. 

DATED: November 27, 2006. STANTON, KAY & WATSON, LLP 

 By: 

 Anne Bevington 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

ORDER 

 The Court having considered plaintiffs’ Case Management Conference Statement, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference scheduled for December 1, 2006, be 

continued to February 2, 2007, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 2 on the 4th Floor of the above-entitled 

Court, located at 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California. 

 11/29/06 

DATED: ______________________ _____________________________________ 

HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

F:\CASES\7000\7000.1055 Canyon Springs Ent. II\Pleadings\Admin Request to Vacate Default and Permit Amendment.doc

Case 4:06-cv-03058-CW Document 17 Filed 11/29/06 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

PROOF OF SERVICE

Pillar 

Tower & Column 

One Maritime Plaza, 

Suite 2800 

San Francisco, CA 

94111 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE

CASE NAME: Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for 

Northern California; et al. v. Canyon Springs Enterprisers.; et al. 

CASE NUMBER: United States District Court, Northern District of California 

 No. C-06-3058 CW (EMC) 

 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California. I am over the age 

of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 101 New Montgomery Street, Fifth 

Floor, San Francisco, California 94105. 

 On November 27, 2006, I served the following document(s) described as: 

PLAINTIFFS’ CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT; 

(PROPOSED) ORDER 

on the following party/parties: 

GREGORY MAX CHEHEY 

3001 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, #205 

Palm Springs, CA 92262-6901 

ROBERT KEITH CLARK 

3001 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, #205 

Palm Springs, CA 92262-6901 

CANYON SPRINGS ENTERPRISES, dba RSH 

CONSTRUCTION 

3001 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, #205 

Palm Springs, CA 92262-6901 

ROBERT STANLEY HAMILTON 

3001 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, #205 

Palm Springs, CA 92262-6901 

 X (BY MAIL) with postage thereon fully prepaid in the designated area for 

outgoing mail. I am readily familiar with STANTON, KAY & WATSON’S 

practice of collection and processing correspondence whereby mail is sealed, 

given the appropriate postage and placed in a designated mail collection area. 

Each day’s mail is collected and deposited with the United States Postal Service 

after the close of each day’s business. I am aware that on motion of the party 

served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter 

date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

above is true and correct and that this Declaration is executed on November 27, 2006 at 

San Francisco, California. 

 

 Carol M. Christensen 

Case 4:06-cv-03058-CW Document 17 Filed 11/29/06 Page 3 of 3