Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-03098/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-03098-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a

Korean corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 PANASONIC CORPORATION, a Japanese

corporation, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 10-03098 JSW

ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTIONS

Docket Nos. 178, 180

On October 14, 2015, Toshiba Corporation filed a motion to intervene and stay proceedings

pending arbitration. The motion was accompanied by an administrative motion to file portions of

the motion, as well as two exhibits, under seal. On October 19, 2015, Panasonic Corporation and

Panasonic Corporation of North America filed a memorandum in opposition to Toshiba’s

administrative motion to file under seal. 

Now before the Court are: (1) Toshiba’s motion for leave to file a reply in support of its

motion to seal (Docket No. 178) and (2) Samsung Electronics Co.’s motion for leave to file a

response in support of Toshiba’s motion to seal (Docket No. 180). These administrative motions are

GRANTED. Toshiba’s reply and Samsung’s response are now due October 28, 2015. In addition to

any other issues that Toshiba and Samsung may address in the reply and response, Toshiba and

Samsung shall address whether the Court should order disclosure pursuant to a protective order.

The Court notes that neither Toshiba’s motion for leave to file a reply nor Samsung’s motion

for leave to file a response is accompanied by a stipulation or by a declaration reflecting an attempt

to meet and confer regarding these administrative motions. Counsel for Toshiba and Samsung are

Case 4:10-cv-03098-JSW Document 182 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

admonished for their failure to comply with Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 7-11(a). 

In the future, all motions for administrative relief “must be accompanied . . . by either a stipulation

under Civil L.R. 7-12 or by a declaration that explains why a stipulation could not be obtained.” 

Civil L.R. 7-11(a).

All other pending motions shall be addressed by separate order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 26, 2015 

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

for

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:10-cv-03098-JSW Document 182 Filed 10/26/15 Page 2 of 2