Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235-85/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-5235 MMC

ORDER STRIKING SEVEN SEPARATE

MOTIONS WITH LEAVE TO FILE AS

CONSOLIDATED MOTION

For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order Re: Post-Trial Briefing, filed May 13,

2014, and in accordance with the Court’s findings made at the Status Conference

conducted today’s date, the following motions, filed May 8 and May 9, 2014 by Fairchild

Semiconductor International, Inc. (“Fairchild”), are hereby STRICKEN and may be

consolidated in a single motion not to exceed forty-five pages in length:

1. Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Infringement of

the ’977 Patent, or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial (Dkt. No. 568)

2. Motion for New Trial on Damages (Dkt. No. 569)

3. Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative, New Trial on

Damages (Dkt. No. 570)

4. Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law that Patent No. 6,538,908

Is Invalid or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial (Dkt. No. 571)

5. Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Infringement of

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 593 Filed 06/13/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079 or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial (Dkt. No. 572)

6. Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding No Infringement

of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908 or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial (Dkt. No.

573)

7. Motion For Judgment as a Matter of Law that U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079 Is

Anticipated, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial (Dkt. No. 575)

Power Integrations, Inc.’s opposition thereto likewise may not exceed forty-five

pages in length, and Fairchild’s reply may not exceed twenty pages in length.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 13, 2014 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 593 Filed 06/13/14 Page 2 of 2