Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02468/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02468-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP. 

701 University Ave., #110 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

(916) 443-4443 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 

Case No. 2:15-cv-02468 JAM EFB 

 1 

CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

ROBERT L. CHALFANT, SBN 203051 

Email: rlc@creggerlaw.com 

ALEXANDER L. NOWINSKI, SBN 304967 

Email: anowinski@creggerlaw.com 

701 University Avenue, Suite 110 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Phone: 916.443-4443 

Fax: 916.443-2124 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT 

KEVIN W. HARRIS SBN 133084 

Attorney at Law 

1387 Garden Hwy., Ste. 200 

Sacramento, CA 95833 

Tel.: (916) 271-0688 

Fax: (855) 800-4454 

Attorney for Plaintiff, 

CHONG VANG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHONG VANG, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT; SGT. ERIN McATEE; 

DEPUTY RYAN TRAPANI (BADGE No. 

1395); DEPUTY NICK SHEEHAN 

(BADGE No. 524); DEPUTY WRIGHT 

(BADGE No. 32); DEPUTY JACOB 

THRALL (BADGE No. 1215); DEPUTY 

CHILANG (BADGE No. 1399) and DOES 

1 – 40, 

Defendants. 

No.: 2:15-cv-02468 JAM EFB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

DEFENDANT COUNTY OF 

SACRAMENTO’S TIME TO RESPOND 

TO THE COMPLAINT 

 WHEREAS on May 26, 2015, an action was commenced in the Superior Court of the 

State of California for the County of Sacramento, entitled Chong Vang, Plaintiff vs. County of 

Case 2:15-cv-02468-JAM-EFB Document 6 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 3
CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP. 

701 University Ave., #110 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

(916) 443-4443 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 

Case No. 2:15-cv-02468 JAM EFB 

 2 

Sacramento, et al., Defendants, Case No. 34-2015-00179654; 

WHEREAS on November 30, 2015, Plaintiff’s complaint was removed to this Court by 

Defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); 

WHEREAS the case was assigned to United States District Judge John A. Mendez; 

WHEREAS Judge Mendez’s standing order on filing requirements requires counsel 

contemplating the filing of any motion to meet and confer on substance and potential resolution; 

WHEREAS Defendant’s counsel Alexander Nowinski and Wendy Motooka contacted 

Plaintiff’s counsel Kevin Harris by phone on the afternoon of November 30, 2015, to discuss 

Defendant’s contemplated response; 

WHEREAS counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant County agreed on a desire to avoid 

unnecessary motions practice, assess and review the pleadings, and discuss resolution of the case; 

WHEREAS the deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint was originally 

December 7, 2015; 

 THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, by and through their counsel of record, as 

follows: 

1. Upon the Court’s approval of this stipulation, Defendant shall have thirty (30) days in 

which to file a responsive pleading in any manner authorized by Rule 12 of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants’ deadline to file a response is extended until 

January 6, 2016. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATE: December 1, 2015 CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP 

 /s/ Alexander L. Nowinski 

ROBERT L. CHALFANT 

ALEXANDER L. NOWINSKI 

Attorneys for Defendants County of Sacramento and 

Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department 

DATE: December 1, 2015 /s/ Kevin W. Harris 

 KEVIN W. HARRIS 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Chong Vang 

Case 2:15-cv-02468-JAM-EFB Document 6 Filed 12/02/15 Page 2 of 3
CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP. 

701 University Ave., #110 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

(916) 443-4443 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 

Case No. 2:15-cv-02468 JAM EFB 

 3 

ORDER 

After considering the Stipulation by and between the parties through their counsel of record, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Defendant County of Sacramento shall have until January 6, 2016, to respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint in any manner authorized by Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE: 12/1/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ 

 HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 2:15-cv-02468-JAM-EFB Document 6 Filed 12/02/15 Page 3 of 3