Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-01777/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-01777-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOHAMMAD SARABRI, Individually and

on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO.,

L.P.A.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No.10cv1777 AJB (NLS)

ORDER (1) ADOPTING SPECIAL

MASTER’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AND

(2) GRANTING JOINT MOTION

CERTIFYING CLASS AND

PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT

[Doc. Nos. 24, 28]

On April 12, 2012, at the Parties’ request, the Court appointed Judge Herbert B. Hoffman (Ret.)

to serve as a Special Master per Fed. R. Civ. P. 53. Judge Hoffman was appointed to assist with all

settlement issues, including necessary reports and recommendations on proposed findings and orders in

the case. 

On April 6, 2012, after the extensive arms-length negotiations, and mediation before Special

Master Hoffman, Plaintiff and Defendant (herein jointly referred to as the “Parties”) entered into a Class

Action Settlement Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”), which is subject to review

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, for the monetary damages as set forth in the Agreement. Further, Defendant

agreed to an 18 month Stipulation and Order for Injunction (hereinafter referred to as the “Stipulated

Injunction”). 

Pursuant to their Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement Agreement

1 10cv1777

Case 3:10-cv-01777-AJB-NLS Document 29 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(hereinafter referred to as the “Preliminary Approval Motion”), the Parties now request preliminary

certification of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) settlement class and preliminary approval of the

proposed class action settlement. 

Special Master Hoffman has issued a report and recommendation, recommending that the Court

preliminarily certify this Lawsuit as a class action and preliminarily approves the proposed class action

settlement. 

The Court has read and considered the Agreement, Preliminary Approval Motion, Special

Master Hoffman’s Report and Recommendation and the record. All capitalized terms used herein have

the meanings defined herein and/or in the Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. JURISDICTION: The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Lawsuit and

over all settling parties hereto. 

2. PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT: The Court preliminarily finds that the settlement of the Lawsuit, on the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement, and

the Exhibits thereto, is in all respects fundamentally fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests

of the Settlement Class members, especially in light of the benefits to the Settlement Class members, the

strength and weaknesses of the Plaintiffs case, the complexity, expense and probable duration of further

litigation, the risk and delay inherent and possible appeals. The class list will also be provided to Class

Counsel as per the Settlement Agreement. The Court also preliminarily approves the Stipulated

Injunction attached to the Agreement as Exhibit 5. Provided that the Settlement is finally approved, the

Court will enter the Stipulated Injunction upon entry of the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with

Prejudice. The Court finds that the Agreement is sufficient to warrant notice of the Settlement to the

persons in the Settlement Class and a full hearing on the approval of the Settlement.

3. CAFA NOTICE: In compliance with the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, Pub. L. No.

109-2, 119 Stat. 4, and as set forth in the Agreement, Defendant shall be ultimately responsible for

serving written notice of the proposed class action settlement on the U.S. attorney general and the

attorney general of each state, with the parties agreeing such notices to be given by the Claims

2 10cv1777

Case 3:10-cv-01777-AJB-NLS Document 29 Filed 09/04/12 Page 2 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Administrator under the direction of the Defendant. 

4. CLASS MEMBERS: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2) and (b)(3), the Lawsuit is

hereby preliminarily certified, for settlement purposes only, as a class action on behalf of the “Settlement Class” shall mean all persons with unique cell phone numbers within the United States who were

called by Defendant as identified in Defendant’s records, between August 25, 2006, through August 25,

2010, on their paging service, cellular telephone service, mobile radio service, radio common carrier

service, or other service for which they were charged for the call, through the use of any automatic

telephone dialing system as set forth in 47 U.S.C. Section 227(b)(1)(A)(iii) or artificial or prerecorded

voice , which resulted in a contact, i.e., a live connection or a prerecorded voice message, identified by

Defendant from their records in discovery and confirmatory discovery as one of the approximately

600,000 unique cell phones they called, and as identified in Defendant’s records to be provided to the

Claims Administrator (hereinafter referred to as the “Settlement Class”). The Settlement Class shall not

include any officer, director, attorney, or heir or assign of Defendant. Further, the Settlement Class shall

not include any officer or juror who may consider the case. 

5. CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AND CLASS COUNSEL APPOINTMENT: Pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, the Court preliminarily certifies Plaintiff Mohammed Sarabri as the Class Representative and Hyde & Swigart and the Law Offices of Douglas J. Campion as Class Counsel. 

6. NOTICE AND CLAIMS PROCESS: The Court approves the form and substance of the

proposed notice procedure set forth in the Agreement. As provided in that Agreement, Defendant shall

provide the most current addresses and (if available) social security numbers for the Settlement Class

members obtained from its databases to Claims Administrator ILYM Group, who shall mail a postcardtype Notice to each Class Member at their last known address as provided by Defendant, and update

those addresses for which a more current address can be obtained. The postcard shall reference a

website established for this Settlement, and that website shall contain the full details of the Settlement. 

The postcard shall also contain the Claims Administrator’s toll free telephone number so that the Class

Members can inquire about the Settlement and also make a claim over the telephone. At least ten (10)

days prior to the Final Approval Hearing, the Claims Administrator shall file a declaration of compli3 10cv1777

Case 3:10-cv-01777-AJB-NLS Document 29 Filed 09/04/12 Page 3 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ance with the notice procedures as set forth in the Agreement. The form and method for notifying the

Class Members of the Settlement and its terms and conditions satisfies the requirements of Fed. R. Civ.

P. 23(c)(2)(B) and due process, and constitutes the best notice process is designed to advise the Class

Members of their rights. Further, the Court finds that the claims process set forth in the Agreement is

the best practicable procedure under the circumstances. 

7. CLAIMS PROCESS, CY PRES AND REVERSION: The Court preliminarily approves

the process set forth in the Agreement for submitting, reviewing, approving and paying all claims from

the $525,000 Settlement Fund, and for paying the class counsels costs of litigation and incentive

payment from the Settlement Fund. The Court preliminarily approves of the reversion to Defendant of

any amounts of the Settlement Fund not paid out, after all claims, the cy pres amounts, if necessary, the

Incentive Payment and the plaintiffs, costs of litigation are fully paid from that fund. Such reversion

amount shall be paid only after Defendant pays a $150,000 minimum for claims, or if not, the difference

between the claims paid and $150,000 being a cy pres award to be paid to a charity chosen jointly by the

parties and approved by the Court. 

8. CLASS CERTIFICATION: The Court preliminarily finds that the Lawsuit satisfies the

applicable prerequisites for class action treatment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, namely:

A. The Settlement Class members are so numerous that joinder of all of them in 

the Lawsuit would be impracticable;

B. There are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class 

members, which predominate over any individual questions;

C. The claims Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class; 

D. The Plaintiff and Class Counsel have fairly and adequately represented and 

protected the interests of all Settlement Class members; and 

E. Class treatment of these claims will be efficient and manageable, thereby 

achieving an appreciable measure of judicial economy, and a class action is 

superior to other available methods for a fair and efficient adjudication of this 

controversy. 

4 10cv1777

Case 3:10-cv-01777-AJB-NLS Document 29 Filed 09/04/12 Page 4 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9. EXCLUSIONS: Any Settlement Class member who desires to be excluded from the

class must send a written request for exclusion to the Claims Administrator, with a postmark date no

later than ten (10) days after the last date to file claims during the Claims Period. The Claims Administrator’s address shall be provided in the notice mailed to the Class Members and also shall be posted on

the website. The Claims Administrator shall provide a list of those persons requesting exclusion to

Class Counsel and to Defendant’s counsel after the deadline for exclusion passes, but no later than then

(10) days prior to the Final Approval Hearing. A copy of that list will be filed with the Parties’ Motion

for Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement.

10. To be effective, the written request for exclusion must contain the person’s full name and

address and be signed by the Settlement Class member. They must also state generally that they wish to

be excluded from the settlement. 

11. Any Settlement Class member who submits a valid and timely request for exclusion shall

not be bound by the Agreement or settlement. 

12. OBJECTIONS: Any Settlement Class member who intends to object to the fairness of

the Settlement must file a written objection with the Court, at United States District Court, Southern

District of California, Office of the Clerk, 880 Front Street, Suite 4290, San Diego, CA, 92101, no later

than ten (10) days after the last date to file claims during the Claims Period. Further, any such

Settlement Class member must, within the same time period, provide a copy of the written objection to

Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, whose addresses shall be set forth in the website’s notice advising

the Settlement Class members about objections. 

13. To be considered, the written objection must be signed by the Settlement Class member and

state: the Settlement Class member’s full name, address and telephone number, the reasons for the

objection, and whether the objector intends to appear at the Final Approval Hearing on their own behalf

or through counsel. Further, the Settlement Class member must attach to the written objection

documents supporting the objection. 

14. Any Settlement Class member who does not file a valid and timely objection to the

Settlement shall be barred from seeking review of the Settlement by appeal or otherwise. 

5 10cv1777

Case 3:10-cv-01777-AJB-NLS Document 29 Filed 09/04/12 Page 5 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

15. FINAL APPROVAL HEARING: Judge Battaglia shall conduct a hearing (hereinafter the

“Final Approval Hearing”) on Friday, January 18, 2013, at 1:30 p.m., at 940 Front Street, Court Room

12, San Diego, CA 92101 to review the following issues:

A. Whether, this action satisfies the applicable prerequisites for class action treatment 

for settlement purposes under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23;

B. Whether the proposed settlement is fundamentally fair, reasonable, adequate, and in 

the best interest of the Settlement Class members and should be approved by the 

Court; 

C. Whether the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal With Prejudice, as provided 

under the Agreement, should be entered, dismissing the Lawsuit with prejudice and 

releasing the Released Claims against Released Parties; 

D. To discuss and review other issues deemed appropriate. 

16. Attendance at the Final Approval Hearing is not necessary. Settlement Class members

need not appear at the hearing or take any other action to indicate their approval of the proposed class

action settlement. Settlement Class members wishing to be heard are, however, required to indicate in

their written objection whether they intend to appear at the Final Approval Hearing. 

17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS: The Agreement and this Order shall be null and

void if any of the following occur:

A. The Agreement is terminated by any of the Parties for failure of any 

consideration under the Agreement, or any specified condition to the 

settlement set forth in the Agreement is not satisfied and the satisfaction of 

such condition is not waived in writing by the Parties;

B. The Court rejects, in any material respect, the Final Judgment and Order of

Dismissal With Prejudice substantially in the form and consent to the entry of 

another form thereof; 

C. The Court rejects any component of the Agreement, including any 

amendment thereto approved by the Parties; 

6 10cv1777

Case 3:10-cv-01777-AJB-NLS Document 29 Filed 09/04/12 Page 6 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

D. The Court approves the Agreement, including any amendment thereto 

approved by the Parties, but such approval is reversed on appeal and such 

reversal becomes final by lapse of time or otherwise; 

18. If the Agreement and this Order are voided under paragraph 18, then the Agreement shall

have no force and effect and the Parties’ rights and defenses shall be restored, without prejudice, to their

respective positions as if the Agreement had never been executed and this order never entered. 

19. The Court retains continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over the action to consider all

further matters arising out of or connected with the settlement, including the administration and

enforcement of the Agreement. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 4, 2012

Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia

U.S. District Judge

I:\Chambers Battaglia\DJ CASES\2 Orders to be filed\10cv1777 order approving settlement.wpd 7 10cv1777

Case 3:10-cv-01777-AJB-NLS Document 29 Filed 09/04/12 Page 7 of 7