Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00836/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00836-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAAHDI COLEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DERRAL G. ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00836-AWI-GBC (PC) 

AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL

ORDER - NOTICE AND WARNING OF

REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

I. Procedural History, Woods v. Carey, and Contemporaneous Notice

Plaintiff Saahdi Coleman (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 6, 2011, the Court issued a second informational

order, advising Plaintiff that Defendants may file a motion for summary judgment and how Plaintiff

must oppose the motion in order to avoid dismissal, pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th

Cir. 1998). Doc. 24. On October 6, 2011, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Doc.

70. March 9, 2012, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the supplemental motion for summary judgment. 

Doc. 75; Doc. 76; Doc. 77; Doc. 79. On Mar 26, 2012, Defendants filed a reply. Doc. 82.

On July 6, 2012, the Ninth Circuit found that the notice and warning of requirements for

opposing a defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be issued contemporaneously when

a defendant files a motion for summary judgment, as opposed to a year or more in advance. Woods

v. Carey, --- F.3d ---, 2012 WL 2626912, at * 4 (9th Cir. Jul. 6, 2012). In order to address the time

Page 1 of 4

Case 1:06-cv-00836-AWI-SAB Document 88 Filed 08/08/12 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

delay between providing notice and the filing of Defendants’ motion, the Court will issue this

amended second informational order to Plaintiff, in accordance with Woods.

II. Notice and Warning of Requirements for Opposing a Motion for Summary Judgment,

Pursuant to Woods and Rand

Pursuant to Woods, Rand, and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the

Court hereby notifies Plaintiff of the following rights and requirements for opposing a motion for

summary judgment:

1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summaryjudgment are briefed pursuant to Local

Rule 230(l). 

2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’

motion for summary judgment. Local Rule 230(l). If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a

statement of non-opposition to the motion, this action may be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure

to prosecute. The opposition or statement of non-opposition must be filed not more than 21 days

after the date of service of the motion. Id. 

3. A motion for summary judgment is a request for judgment on some or all of Plaintiff’s

claims in favor of Defendants without trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Defendants’ motion sets forth the

facts which they contend are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle them to judgment as

a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). This is called the Statement of Undisputed Facts. Local Rule

260(a).

Plaintiff has the right to oppose a motion for summary judgment. To oppose the motion,

Plaintiff must show proof of his claims. Plaintiff may agree with the facts set forth in Defendants’

motion but argue that Defendants are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 

In the alternative, if Plaintiff does not agree with the facts set forth in Defendants’ motion,

he may show that Defendants’ facts are disputed in one or more of the following ways: (1) Plaintiff

may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the complaint or the opposition if (a)

the complaint or opposition shows that Plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and

(b) Plaintiff calls to the Court’s attention those parts of the complaint or opposition upon which

Page 2 of 4

Case 1:06-cv-00836-AWI-SAB Document 88 Filed 08/08/12 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff relies; (2) Plaintiff may serve and file declarations setting forth the facts which Plaintiff

believes prove his claims; (3) Plaintiff may rely upon written records but Plaintiff must prove that 1

the records are what he claims they are; or (4) Plaintiff may rely upon all or any part of the transcript 2

of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions obtained in this proceeding. 

Should Plaintiff fail to contradict Defendants’ motion with declarations or other evidence,

Defendants’ evidence will be taken as truth, and final judgment may be entered without a full trial. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).

In opposing Defendants’ motion for summaryjudgment, Local Rule 260(b) requires Plaintiff

to reproduce Defendants’ itemized facts in the Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit those facts

which are undisputed and denythose which are disputed. If Plaintiff disputes (denies) a fact, Plaintiff

must cite to the evidence used to support that denial (e.g., pleading, declaration, deposition,

interrogatory answer, admission, or other document). Local Rule 260(b).

4. If discovery has not yet been opened or if discovery is still open and Plaintiff is not yet

able to present facts to justify the opposition to the motion, the Court will consider a request to

postpone consideration of Defendants’ motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). Any request to postpone

consideration of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment must include the following: (1) a

declaration setting forth the specific facts Plaintiff hopes to elicit from further discovery, (2) a

showing that the facts exist, and (3) a showing that the facts are essential to opposing the motion for

summary judgment. Blough v. Holland Realty, Inc., 574 F.3d 1084, 1091 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009); Tatum

v. City and County of San Francisco, 441 F.3d 1090, 1100-01 (9th Cir. 2006); State of California

v. Campbell, 138 F.3d 772, 779 (9th Cir. 1998). The request to postpone the motion for summary

judgment must identify what information is sought and how it would preclude summary judgment. 

A declaration is a written statement setting forth facts (1) which are admissible in evidence, (2) which are based

1

on the personal knowledge of the person giving the statement, and (3) to which the person giving the statement is

competent to testify. 28 U.S.C. § 1746; Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(4). A declaration must be dated and signed under penalty

of perjury as follows: “I declare (or certify, verify or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on (date). (Signature).” 28 U.S.C. § 1746.

Sworn or certified copies of all papers referred to in the declaration must be included and served on the

2

opposing party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).

Page 3 of 4

Case 1:06-cv-00836-AWI-SAB Document 88 Filed 08/08/12 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Blough, 574 F.3d at 1091 n.5; Tatum, 441 F.3d at 1100-01; Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 853 (9th

Cir. 1998); Local Rule 260(b). 

5. Unsigned declarations will be stricken, and declarations not signed under penalty of

perjury have no evidentiary value.

6. The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

or the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California may result in the imposition of sanctions

including but not limited to dismissal of the action or entry of default.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 7, 2012 

0jh02o UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Page 4 of 4

Case 1:06-cv-00836-AWI-SAB Document 88 Filed 08/08/12 Page 4 of 4