Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00773/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00773-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICIA A. McCOLM,

Plaintiff,

v.

TRINITY COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-0773 KJM CKD (PC)

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff commenced this action in March 2014. On May 29, 2014, the undersigned 

dismissed the complaint and granted thirty days’ leave to amend. On June 24, 2014, plaintiff was 

granted a 90-day extension of time to file an amended complaint. On September 24, 2014, 

plaintiff was granted a further extension of time, until December 23, 2014, to file an amended 

complaint. That order notified plaintiff that “no further extensions of time will be granted.” The 

docket indicates that plaintiff was served with the order. To date, plaintiff has not filed an 

amended complaint; rather, she seeks yet another extension of time (ECF No. 20).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for extension of time 

(ECF No. 20) is denied.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Local Rule 110; 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:14-cv-00773-KJM-CKD Document 21 Filed 01/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 6, 2015

2/ mcco0773.fta

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-00773-KJM-CKD Document 21 Filed 01/06/15 Page 2 of 2