Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01634/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01634-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1634

WASIM ATA BEY EX REL ERICK SEALEY, an individual, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

J. W. MITCHELL, 1709 VSP, an individual; DAVID A. PATRICK, 

0304 YCSO, an individual; THOMAS CHABOT, 5543 YCSO, an 

individual; JASON STUMP, 4318 YCSO, an individual; DONALD 

MICKET, 5583 YCSO, an individual; BYRON EVANS, 2231 YCSO, 

an individual; DONNA MAW, Deputy Commonwealth Attorney, an 

individual; JAMES LAMPRECHT, York Magistrate, an 

individual; STEPHEN A. HUDGINS, Chief Judge, an individual; 

JEFFREY SHAW, Circuit Judge, an individual; MICHAEL 

SOBERICK, SR., Judge, an individual, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, 

District Judge. (4:15-cv-00044-RAJ-LRL) 

Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Wasim Ata Bey ex rel Erick Sealey, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 15-1634 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/31/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Plaintiff Wasim Ata Bey ex rel Erick Sealey (Ata Bey) seeks 

to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) 

(2012) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be 

granted. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-47 (1949). Because the deficiencies identified by the 

district court may be remedied by the filing of an amended 

complaint, we conclude that the order Ata Bey seeks to appeal is 

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local 

Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED

Appeal: 15-1634 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/31/2015 Pg: 2 of 2