Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01106/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01106-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN McMILLAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

TIM V. VIRGA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-1106 TLN CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on the first amended complaint against defendant Ma. (ECF 

Nos. 9 & 12.) On February 25, 2016, defendant Ma filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF 

No. 35.) On April 1, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of nonopposition to the pending motion by April 30, 2016. Plaintiff was informed that failure to do so 

would result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (ECF No. 36.) After 

plaintiff filed a Notice of Change of Address on April 18, 2016, this order was re-served on 

plaintiff. Plaintiff has not responded to the order. 

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 

dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:14-cv-01106-TLN-CKD Document 39 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 19, 2016

2 / mcmi1106.46fr

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-01106-TLN-CKD Document 39 Filed 05/19/16 Page 2 of 2