Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01556/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01556-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS HAUSCHILD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF RICHMOND AND

CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-01556 WHA

ORDER RE DATES FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTIONS

Plaintiff Thomas Hauschild has filed a motion for partial summary judgment and noticed

a hearing for May 19, 2016. In response, defendants City of Richmond and Christopher

Magnus filed an administrative motion to continue the hearing date for plaintiff’s motion. The

reason given is that defendants plan on filing cross motions for summary judgment on the same

claims and it would be most efficient to conduct the hearing on the cross motions at the same

time. Furthermore, as fact discovery does not close for several weeks, defendants aver that they

have additional depositions scheduled which will provide evidence needed to oppose plaintiff’s

summary judgment motion and also to support their own summary judgment motion. 

Specifically, defendants assert they will be deposing plaintiff, and this deposition testimony is

needed to rebut plaintiff’s declaration submitted with his summary judgment motion.

Good cause shown, defendants’ motion is GRANTED as follows. As stated in their

filing, defendants shall file their summary judgment motion by MAY 19, noticed on the normal

Case 3:15-cv-01556-WHA Document 59 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 35-day track, with a hearing set for EIGHT A.M. ON JUNE 23, 2016. Defendants’ opposition to

plaintiff’s summary judgment shall be due on JUNE 2. Plaintiff’s reply to defendants’

opposition is due on JUNE 9. The hearing on plaintiff’s summary judgment motion shall also be

set for JUNE 23 AT EIGHT A.M.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 21, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-01556-WHA Document 59 Filed 04/21/16 Page 2 of 2