Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04375/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04375-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FURTHER STIP. RE CMC DATE & REL. DATES, & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C 03-4375 JW (RS) 

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649 

RAGESH K. TANGRI - #159477 

ASHOK RAMANI - #200020 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

XIANGFENG "SEAN" CHEN, an individual; 

CHUN XIA, an individual; and VASTA 

TECHNOLOGIES, a California corporation, 

Defendants.

Case No. C 03-4375 JW (RS) 

FURTHER STIPULATION REGARDING 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

DATE AND RELATED DATES, AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:03-cv-04375-JW Document 76 Filed 08/15/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

FURTHER STIP. RE CMC DATE & REL. DATES, & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C 03-4375 JW (RS) 

324425.09

Plaintiff Cadence Design Systems, Inc., Defendants Xiangfeng “Sean” Chen, Chun Xia, 

and Vasta Technologies move the Court to continue the case-management conference presently 

scheduled for August 29, 2005, as well as the associated obligations to serve initial disclosures 

and file and serve a case-management conference statement, Rule 26(f) report, and Joint ADR 

Certification and Stipulation. The parties have exchanged draft settlement documents, and have 

agreed on many material settlement terms, but need additional time to come to final resolution. 

This modification would have no discernable effect on the case schedule. The prior time 

modifications in this case are: (1) the parties’ stipulation, entered by the Court, to extend the 

Defendants’ time to respond to the Complaint; (2) the parties’ stipulation, entered by the Court, 

postponing the preliminary-injunction briefing schedule seventy days to accommodate discovery 

issues; (3) the parties’ stipulation, entered by the Court, resetting the case-managementconference date; (4) the parties’ stipulation, note entered by the Court, further postponing the 

preliminary-injunction briefing schedule in light of the parties’ negotiation of the stipulation 

subsequently filed and entered by the Court; and (5) the parties’ six further stipulations, entered 

by the Court, resetting the case-management-conference date. 

The parties therefore stipulate and agree, as required by Local Rules 6-2, 7-11, and 16-

2(e), that the Court should modify its Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference as 

follows: 

1. The case-management-conference shall occur in Courtroom #8 at 10:00 A.M. on 

December 19, 2005. 

2. The parties’ last day to complete initial disclosures or state objections to such 

disclosures in their Rule 26(f) report, and to file and serve their case-management 

statement and Rule 26(f) report shall be December 5, 2005. 

3. The parties’ last day to file their Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR 

process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference shall be December 5, 

2005.

Case 5:03-cv-04375-JW Document 76 Filed 08/15/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

FURTHER STIP. RE CMC DATE & REL. DATES, & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C 03-4375 JW (RS) 

324425.09

4. The parties’ last day to meet and confer as to initial disclosures, early settlement, 

ADR process selection, and their discovery plan shall be November 28, 2005. 

5.

Dated: August 12, 2005 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ Ashok Ramani______________

ASHOK RAMANI 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. 

Dated: MANCHESTER WILLIAMS & SEIBERT

By: /s/ Steven Rowe Manchester ____ _

STEVEN ROWE MANCHESTER 

Attorneys for Defendants 

VASTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND 

CHUN XIA 

Dated: NOLAN, ARMSTRONG & BARTON, 

LLP

By: /s/ Thomas J. Nolan___________ _

THOMAS J. NOLAN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

XIANGFENG “SEAN” CHEN 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:

By: __________________________________

THE HON. JAMES WARE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

/s/ James Ware

August 15, 2005

Case 5:03-cv-04375-JW Document 76 Filed 08/15/05 Page 3 of 3