Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01093/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01093-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

LEA ANN CHRONES, et al.,

Defendants. 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:06-CV-01093-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER TO SUBMIT NEW APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH

PLAINTIFF'S SIGNATURE, OR PAY

FILING FEE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and a

certified copy of his prison trust account statement. However, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis did not include plaintiff's signature. Each document submitted for filing must include the

original signature of the filing party or parties. Local Rule 7-131. Plaintiff will be provided the

opportunity to submit a new application to proceed in forma pauperis with plaintiff's signature, or in the

alternative, pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to plaintiff the form for application to proceed in forma

pauperis.

2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit a

completed application to proceed in forma pauperis with plaintiff' s signature, or in the alternative, pay

Case 1:06-cv-01093-GSA Document 5 Filed 09/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the $350.00 filing fee for this action. Plaintiff is not required to submit another certified copy of his

prison trust account statement. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that

this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 27, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b6edp0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01093-GSA Document 5 Filed 09/27/06 Page 2 of 2