Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-03169/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-03169-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C-02-03169 JF (RS)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

(JFLC3)

 **E-filed 11/19/07**

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DANIEL MYERS, et al., 

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

JANE AIELLO, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case Number C-02-03169 JF (RS)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS'

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF

TIME

[re: docket no. 35]

Plaintiffs filed the instant action on July 2, 2002. On October 29, 2002, this Court

granted Defendants' motion to dismiss with leave to amend. On January 9, 2003, the Court

granted Plaintiffs' request for an extension of time within which to file their amended complaint,

but Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint. On March 5, 2003, the Court granted

Defendants' motion for entry of judgment. Judgment was entered on March 11, 2003. On June

12, 2003, the Court denied Plaintiffs' request for inclusion of additional parties and for sanctions. 

Plaintiffs gave notice of intent to file a notice of appeal on July 14, 2003, but they never filed a

notice of appeal or paid the filing fee. On October 29, 2003, Plaintiffs filed a supplemental

motion to vacate. This motion was terminated on August 6, 2004. 

Case 5:02-cv-03169-JF Document 36 Filed 11/19/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C-02-03169 JF (RS)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

(JFLC3)

On September 17, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a document entitled "Motion to Re-open." On

October 23, 2007, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ request to re-open the case. Plaintiffs now seek a

thirty (30) day extension of time to file an appeal. This is more than four years after the entry of

final judgment in this case. As such, Plaintiffs’ request is untimely, and the motion will be

denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 19, 2007

_________________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:02-cv-03169-JF Document 36 Filed 11/19/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case No. C-02-03169 JF (RS)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

(JFLC3)

Copies of this Order have been served upon the following persons:

Plaintiff:

Daniel Myers

P.O. Box 213

Palo Alto, CA 94302

Counsel for Defendants:

Melissa R. Kiniyalocts 

Office of the County Counsel

70 West Hedding Street, Ninth Floor, East Wing

San Jose, CA 95110-1770

 

Case 5:02-cv-03169-JF Document 36 Filed 11/19/07 Page 3 of 3