Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00856/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00856-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH BLACKWELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00856-AWI-SMS PC

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SET ASIDE

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

WITH PREJUDICE

(Doc. 101)

On June 9, 2008, Plaintiff filed a motion to set aside the Findings and Recommendations

filed on March 3, 2008, on the ground that his Objection was not considered by the Court. (Docs.

90, 101.) Plaintiff misstates the record, and his request is without merit.

Plaintiff obtained a thirty-day extension of time to file an Objection on April 30, 2008, and

his Objection was received and filed on May 12, 2008. (Docs. 94, 96.) This fact is documented in

the Court’s order adopting the Findings and Recommendations, filed on May 27, 2008. (Doc. 97.)

Further, the Court conducted a de novo review in making its determination to adopt the Findings and

Recommendations, as documented in the order. (Id.) To the extent that Plaintiff is claiming he still

had further time in which to file additional objections, Plaintiff is incorrect. A party may file an

Objection. Plaintiff did so, and as a result, the Findings and Recommendations became ready for

submission to the Court. A party may not separately file multiple Objections.

///

///

Case 1:05-cv-00856-AWI -SMS Document 102 Filed 06/16/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff’s Objection received consideration, and his motion to set aside the Findings and

Recommendations on the ground that his Objection was not considered is denied, with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 13, 2008 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00856-AWI -SMS Document 102 Filed 06/16/08 Page 2 of 2