Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00280/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00280-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Liberty Media Holdings, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Vinigay.com; Gustavo Paladeski; Vinicius

Alves, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-11-0280-PHX-LOA

ORDER

The Court has received Plaintiff’s timely Response to Order to Show Cause. (Doc.

39) Upon review of Plaintiff’s Response, the Court construes it also be a request for

leave to supplement the record.

A district court has wide discretion to grant a party leave to supplement the record

upon request in order that the court may obtain accurate information when making its

ruling. LimoStars, Inc. v. New Jersey Car and Limo, Inc., 2011 WL 3471092, * 3 n. 5

(D.Ariz. August 8, 2011) (granting leave to supplement record after default damages

hearing) (citing United States v. Maris, 2011 WL 468554, * 5 n. 5 (D.Nev. Feb. 4, 2011)

(granting leave to file supplemental materials after motions were filed and a hearing held

on a motion for summary judgment); Mitchel v. Holder, 2010 WL 816761, * 1 n. 1

(N.D.Cal. Mar. 9, 2010) (granting leave to file supplemental memorandum concerning

newly obtained evidence); Lumsden v. United States, 2010 WL 2232946, * 1 (E.D.N.C.

June 3, 2010) (granting party leave to submit additional newly discovered evidence).

Case 2:11-cv-00280-LOA Document 41 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

With dual goals of determining the truth and achieving justice when Plaintiff has

been denied any discovery due to Defendants’ default, the Court finds good cause to grant

Plaintiff’s request for leave to supplement the record herein.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s Order to Show Cause, issued November 21,

2011, doc. 38, is hereby DISCHARGED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for leave to supplement the

record, doc. 39, is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Response to Order to Show Cause and the

attached Declaration of Brian Dunlap, doc. 39-1 at 1-2, are hereby deemed part of the

default damages record.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application for Entry of Default

Judgment, doc. 24, remains under advisement for ruling.

Dated this 30th day of November, 2011.

Case 2:11-cv-00280-LOA Document 41 Filed 11/30/11 Page 2 of 2