Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01283/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01283-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The failure of one or more of the parties to

participate in the preparation of the Joint Status Report does

not excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file

a status report in accordance with this Order. In the event a

party fails to participate as ordered, the party timely

submitting the status report shall include a declaration

explaining why it was unable to obtain the cooperation of the

(continued...)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROLINE RECORDS, INC., a New York )

corporation; VIRGIN RECORDS ) 2:05-cv-01283-GEB-PAN

AMERICA, INC., a California )

corporation; ARISTA RECORDS LLC, )

a Delaware limited liability )

company; UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a )

Delaware corporation; ELEKTRA )

ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., a )

Delaware corporation; and )

INTERSCOPE RECORDS, a California )

general partnership, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

KRISTI SUBHANSEN, ) CONFERENCE

)

Defendant. )

)

On August 5, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a request to continue

the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference currently scheduled on

August 22, 2005. The Status Conference is continued to November 14,

2005, 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report shall be filed no later

than October 31, 2005.1

Case 2:05-cv-01283-GEB-EFB Document 9 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1(...continued)

other party or parties.

2

Plaintiffs are hereby notified that this action may be

dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) if Defendant is

not served by October 24, 2005. To avoid dismissal, a 

proof of service shall be filed no later than October 24, 2005. 

If Plaintiffs believe they have good cause to justify

extension of Rule 4(m)’s 120-day service period, they shall file a

declaration no later than October 24, 2005, showing "good cause" why

the action should not be dismissed without prejudice as to that

defendant. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 12, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01283-GEB-EFB Document 9 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2