Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02182/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02182-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION; DECLARATION OF JOHN K. TEHIS; AND ORDER

RILEY SAFER HOLMES & CANCILA LLP

JEFFREY R. WILLIAMS (CSB No. 084156)

jwilliams@rshc-law.com

JOHN K. THEIS (Pro Hac Vice)

jtheis@rshc-law.com

RACHEL S. CHRISTENSON (CSB No. 340898)

rchristenson@rshc-law.com

456 Montgomery Street, 16th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 275-8550

Facsimile: (415) 275-8551

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DALTON EDWARD DYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DALTON EDWARD DYER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF AUBURN, JOSHUA EAGAN, 

and MATTHEW NICHOLS,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:21-cv-02182-JAM-JDP

JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION; 

DECLARATION OF JOHN K. TEHIS; 

AND ORDER

Case 2:21-cv-02182-JAM-JDP Document 76 Filed 12/04/24 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 -

JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION; DECLARATION OF JOHN K. TEHIS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION

Plaintiff Dalton Edward Dyer (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants City of Auburn, Joshua Eagan, 

and Matthew Nichols (“Defendants”) (collectively “the Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Parties settling in principle at the Settlement Conference, the 

Court ordered the Parties to file Dismissal Documents by December 2, 2024 (ECF 74); 

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to the terms of a Release Agreement, but the 

settlement funds have not yet been sent to Plaintiff’s counsel; 

WHEREAS, the Parties intend to file the stipulation of dismissal as soon as Plaintiff is in 

receipt of the settlement funds.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as 

follows: 

(1) The deadline for the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal is extended until 

December 20, 2024. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: December 2, 2024 /s/ _John K. Theis__________________ 

 Counsel for Plaintiff 

Dated: December 2, 2024 /s/ _John Whitefleet_________________ 

 Counsel for Defendants 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 3, 2024 

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:21-cv-02182-JAM-JDP Document 76 Filed 12/04/24 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 -

JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION; DECLARATION OF JOHN K. TEHIS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

DECLARATION OF JOHN K. THEIS

I, John K. Theis, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney admitted pro hac vice to practice before this Court. I am a partner at the 

law firm Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP, and I am an attorney of record for Plaintiff Dalton 

Edward Dyer. 

2. The Parties’ Joint Stipulation requests an order extending the deadline for the Parties to 

file Dismissal Documents. 

3. Good cause exists for this extension for the following reasons: 

a. The Parties have agreed to the terms of the Release Agreement; 

b. The settlement funds have yet been received by Plaintiff’s counsel; and 

c. The Parties intend to file the Dismissal Documents as soon as Plaintiff is in receipt 

of the settlement funds. 

4. In light of the parties near complete settlement, good cause exists for extending the 

deadline to file a stipulation of dismissal.

I declare under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: December 2, 2024 By: /s/ John K. Theis

Jeffrey R. Williams

John K. Theis 

Rachel S. Christenson 

Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DALTON EDWARD DYER

Case 2:21-cv-02182-JAM-JDP Document 76 Filed 12/04/24 Page 3 of 3