Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03879/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03879-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:631 Small Business Act

---

SCHNADER 

HARRISON SEGAL 

&

LEWIS LLP

ONE 

MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 2200

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-5501

TELEPHONE: 415-364-6700

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHDATA 3012318_1 Stipulation re Admin. Motion to Determine Whether Cases Should be Related

Gregory C. Nuti (Bar No. 151754)

Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP

One Montgomery Street, Suite 2200

San Francisco, CA 94104-5501

Telephone: 415-364-6700

Facsimile: 415-364-6785

Arlene P. Messinger

Assistant General Counsel for SBIC Enforcement

U.S. Small Business Administration 

409 3rd Street, S.W., Seventh Floor

Washington, D.C. 20416 

Telephone (202) 205-6857

Facsimile (202) 481-0325

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

United States Small Business Administration 

in its capacity as Receiver for Alto Tech II, L.P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

United States Small Business Administration in 

its capacity as Receiver for Alto Tech II, L.P.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Alto Tech II, LLP,

Defendant.

Case No. C06 3879 EMC

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE 

OPPOSITION TO ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO DETERMINE WHETHER 

CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

No Hearing Required

Judge: Magistrate Edward M. Chen

On September 20, 2007, the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) in its 

capacity as Receiver for Alto Tech II, L.P. (“Alto Tech”) filed an Administrative Motion to 

Determine Whether Cases Should be Related pursuant to Civil Local Rules 3-12 and 7-11

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11(b), Defendants’ response to the Administrative Motion 

“must be filed no later than the third day after the motion has been filed” which would be 

September 25, 2007.

Because the SBA served the Administrative Motion by mail, the attorneys for defendants 

Gloria Wahl and Walter Lee in the action captioned United States Small Business 

; ORDER

Case 3:06-cv-03879-SC Document 36 Filed 09/28/07 Page 1 of 2
SCHNADER 

HARRISON SEGAL 

&

LEWIS LLP

ONE 

MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 2200

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-5501

TELEPHONE: 415-364-6700

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

PHDATA 3012318_1 Stipulation re Admin. Motion to Determine Whether Cases Should be Related

Administration, in its capacity as Receiver of Alto Tech, II, LP v. Alto Tech Ventures, LLC et 

al., Case No. 07-4530 SC, did not receive the Administrative Motion until September 25, 2007.

Defendants Gloria Wahl and Walter Lee request additional time to respond to the 

Administrative Motion. The Receiver does not object to granting defendants additional time to 

respond to the Administrative Motion.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that Defendants Gloria Wahl 

and Walter Lee are granted additional time until September 28, 2007 to file its response to the 

Receiver’s Administrative Motion.

Dated: September 26, 2007 SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP

By: /s/ Gregory C. Nuti

Gregory C. Nuti

Attorneys for Plaintiff, the United States 

Small Business Administration in its 

capacity as Receiver for Alto Tech II, L.P.

Dated: September 26, 2007 Wildman Harrold Allen & Dixon, LLP

By: /s/ Chung-Han Lee

Chung-Han Lee

Attorneys for Defendants Gloria Wahl and 

Walter Lee

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: ________________

____________________________________

Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen

9/28/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:06-cv-03879-SC Document 36 Filed 09/28/07 Page 2 of 2