Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01065/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01065-48/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL D. HARRISON, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

T. MOORE, et al., 

 Defendants.

 Case No. 1:08-cv-1065-AWI-MJS (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR A SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 

243)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 

rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s 

Eighth Amendment claims against numerous defendants. (ECF No. 160.)

On June 5, 2015, Plaintiff moved for a “new scheduling Order [to] be put in place,” 

so that Plaintiff would have additional time to serve Defendants. (ECF No. 243.) The 

Court will deny this motion. 

Of the remaining unserved defendants, Defendants have been ordered to provide 

more information about Zakari, Bastianon, Edmonds and Raygoza (ECF No. 238), 

Case 1:08-cv-01065-AWI-HBK Document 246 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

service has been reattempted on Johnson (ECF No. 245), and Campos has already 

been dismissed (ECF Nos. 236 & 244). The Court anticipates that service issues will be 

resolved without the necessity of changing longstanding case deadlines.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 243) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 17, 2015 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-01065-AWI-HBK Document 246 Filed 06/18/15 Page 2 of 2