Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03952/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03952-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Page 1

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO -- #084965 (CA)

JONATHAN T. PECK -- #12303 (VA)

SANYA HILL MAXION -- # 18739 (WA)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

San Francisco District Office

350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 625-5650

Facsimile: (415) 625-5657

Attorneys for Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHER DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

TAYLOR MADE DIGITAL SYSTEMS, INC.

Defendant. _______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. C 05 3952 JCS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Now on this ____ day of November, 2005, the Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend

time for the Defendant to Respond to the Complaint comes on before this Court. Plaintiff

appeared by and through its attorney of record, Sanya Hill Maxion of the Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission. There were no other appearances.

The Court, after examining the Court file herein and being duly advised in the premises

hereof finds that Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to respond to the Complaint

should be and is hereby granted and Defendant shall have until December 27, 2005, to file its

responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

///

///

///

///

Case 3:05-cv-03952-JCS Document 8 Filed 11/28/2005 Page 1 of 2

30th

Case 3:05-cv-03952-MMC Document 9 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Page 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above findings

of the Court should be and are hereby made by order of the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____________________, 2005 ___________________________________

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-03952-JCS Document 8 Filed 11/28/2005 Page 2 of 2

November 30

JOSEPH C. SPERO

Case 3:05-cv-03952-MMC Document 9 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2