Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STORUS CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

AROA MARKETING, INC., et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-06-2454 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On February 19, 2008, plaintiff electronically filed a voluminous document titled

“Storus’ Proposed Jury Instructions.” Plaintiff has violated General Order 45 and the

Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than

noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one

paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and

. . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not

File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to

the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2. Although compliance with said orders is always

required, compliance is particularly crucial when a party electronically files a document in

connection with a rapidly-approaching court appearance; the instant document was filed in

connection with the February 26, 2008 Pretrial Conference.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 240 Filed 02/21/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the Court’s

Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed document, the Court

may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 21, 2008 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 240 Filed 02/21/08 Page 2 of 2