Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06408/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06408-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHRYN HOGAN, et al., CASE NO. CV-F-03-6408 AWI LJO

 

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE DEPOSITION SCHEDULE,

PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MODIFYING

vs. THE SCHEDULING ORDER

FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPUTY MICHAEL ROBINSON,

et al.,

Defendants.

 / 

This Court conducted an informal discovery conference on November 28, 2006 in Department

8 pursuant to the stipulation of the parties. Plaintiffs Kathryn Hogan, Charlotte-Marie Hogan and

Thomas Slade Hogan appeared by counsel Kevin G. Little. Defendants County of Fresno and County

Sheriff’s Deputy Michael Robinson appeared by counsel James Weakley, Weakley, Ratliff, Arendt &

McGuire, LLP. Defendant Patricia Towne appeared by counsel Jerry D. Casheros, McCormick,

Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, LLP. The parties sought to resolve conflicts in setting certain

depositions and modifying the scheduling order. Having considered the parties’ moving papers, as well

as the arguments of counsel and the Court’s file, the Court issues the following order.

Deposition dates. The depositions are set as follows. The deposition for defendant Michael

Robinson is SET for December 27, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. in the law office of Weakley, Ratliff, Arendt &

McGuire. The deposition for Kathryn Hogan is SET for January 3 and January 4, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. at

a Court reporter’s office in the Sacramento area. The deposition of Charlotte-Marie Hogan is SET for

January 5, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. at a Court reporter’s office also in the Sacramento area. Notice as to the

Case 1:03-cv-06408-LJO-GSA Document 108 Filed 11/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Sacramento area depositions is to be provided by counsel for Ms. Towne within five days of November

28, 2006. The notice should include not only the Court reporter’s address but also driving directions.

Video Deposition of Defendant Robinson. The Court has been informed that the deposition

of Defendant Robinson has been noticed for videotaping. Should plaintiffs elect to videotape the

deposition, Defendant Robinson has requested a protective order. 

Based on the parties’ stipulation at the time of the hearing and good cause shown, the Court

issues a protective order as follows. The videotaped deposition of defendant Robinson may only be used

by the parties and counsel solely for purposes of this litigation. Should the deposition be lodged with

the Court, the video shall be lodged with the Court with an indication that it is to be lodged under seal.

Modification of the Scheduling Order. For good cause shown, the Court modifies the

scheduling order as follows:

Non-expert discovery cut-off February 12, 2007 (new date)

Expert discovery cut-off April 2, 2007 (new date)

Dispositive motion filing deadline April 20, 2007 (unchanged)

Trial July 17, 2007 (unchanged).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 28, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06408-LJO-GSA Document 108 Filed 11/28/06 Page 2 of 2