Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-00118/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-00118-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Scottsdale Insurance Company, an Ohio

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

Market Finders Insurance Corporation, a

Kentucky corporation,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-04-118-PHX-SMM

 ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant Market Finder Insurance Corporation’s Motion

to Strike Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company's Expert, or in the Alternative, to Extend

Defendant's Expert Deadline. (Doc. 92). It is this Court's policy to address issues pertaining

to discovery disputes via telephonic conference. In the Court's Order dated May 22, 2006,

the Court stated the following:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event of a discovery dispute, the parties

shall contact the Court to request a telephonic conference prior to filing any discovery

motions. The parties shall not contact the Court regarding a discovery dispute unless they

have been unable to resolve the dispute themselves, despite personal consultation and sincere

efforts to do so. The parties shall not file any written materials related to a discovery dispute

or discovery motion without express leave of Court. If the Court does order written

submissions, the movant shall include a statement certifying that counsel could not

Case 2:04-cv-00118-SMM Document 107 Filed 03/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

satisfactorily resolve the matter despite personal consultation and sincere efforts to do so, in

accordance with LRCiv 7.2(j) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for

the District of Arizona. (Doc. 75).

Pursuant to the Court's previous Order, the parties are advised to contact the Court

regarding the issues raised in Defendant Market Finder Insurance Corporation’s Motion to

Strike Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company's Expert and the corresponding Opposition

filed by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company. 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Strike (Doc. 92) is DENIED

without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the Court's decision regarding the

Defendants Motion to Strike, Plaintiff's Motion to for a Hearing (Doc. 99) on the Motion to

Strike is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

DATED this 20th day of March, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-00118-SMM Document 107 Filed 03/20/07 Page 2 of 2