Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00478/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00478-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELVIN LEE WILSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0478 GEB GGH P

vs.

SCOTT KERNAN, et al., ORDER AND

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed February 8, 2007, this court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial

statement on or before April 6, 2007. Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order. The court

will therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

16(f); Local Rule 11-110.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement.

2. The pretrial conference set for April 27, 2007, is vacated; the jury trial set for

July 24, 2007, before the Honorable Garland E. Burrell is vacated; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 11-110.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00478-GEB-GGH Document 42 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 4/27/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

wil478.fpt

Case 2:04-cv-00478-GEB-GGH Document 42 Filed 04/27/07 Page 2 of 2