Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02853/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02853-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

356706 v 1 ERSIC’s Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 

(No. C 07 2853 SBA) 

Terrence R. McInnis (#155416) 

 (tmcinnis@rdblaw.com) 

Siavash Daniel Rashtian (#228644) 

 (drashtian@rdblaw.com) 

ROSS, DIXON & BELL, LLP 

5 Park Plaza, Suite 1200 

Irvine, California 92614-8529 

Telephone: (949) 622-2700 

Facsimile: (949) 622-2739 

Monique M. Fuentes (#205501) 

 (mfuentes@rdblaw.com) 

ROSS, DIXON & BELL, LLP 

2001 K Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20006-1040 

Telephone: (202) 662-2000 

Facsimile: (202) 662-2190 

Attorneys for Defendant Executive Risk Specialty 

Insurance Company 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LENSCRAFTERS, INC., and EYEXAM OF 

CALIFORNIA, INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY; EXECUTIVE RISK SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY; UNITED STATES 

FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; MARKEL 

AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and 

WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendants. 

No. C07-02853 SBA 

[Related Case No. C 04-01001 SBA] 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT EXECUTIVE RISK 

SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

 

WHEREAS, by notice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2) dated June 5, 2007, Plaintiffs 

requested that defendant Executive Risk Specialty Insurance Company (“ERSIC”) waive formal 

service of service of the summons and Complaint herein and ERSIC so agreed to waive formal 

service; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(3), ERSIC’s response to the Complaint is 

Case 4:07-cv-02853-SBA Document 44 Filed 08/13/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

356706 v 1

2 

ERSIC’s Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 

(No. C 07 2853 SBA) 

due August 6, 2007; 

WHEREAS, ERSIC has requested and Plaintiffs have agreed to a 25-day extension of 

time for ERSIC to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, no previous extensions of time have been requested or received by ERSIC in 

this matter; 

WHEREAS, on May 31, 2007 and June 29, 2007, the Court issued Case Management 

Scheduling Orders, and thus ERSIC and Plaintiffs agree that the dates set forth in those Orders 

remain notwithstanding the 25-day extension of time to respond to the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, notwithstanding the absence of a responsive pleading, ERSIC agrees to 

comply with all deadlines set by the Court in the Case Management Scheduling Orders; 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby STIPULATE to and REQUEST that the Court 

grant an extension of time, to and including September 4, 2007, for ERSIC to answer or otherwise 

respond to the Complaint. 

Date: August 3, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

 ROSS, DIXON & BELL, LLP 

 /s/ Terrence R. McInnis

Terrence R. McInnis 

and 

Monique M. Fuentes 

Siavash Daniel Rashtian 

Attorneys for Defendant Executive Risk 

Specialty Insurance Company 

Case 4:07-cv-02853-SBA Document 44 Filed 08/13/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

356706 v 1

3 

ERSIC’s Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 

(No. C 07 2853 SBA) 

 HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & McAULIFFE, LLP 

 ___/s/ Celia M. Jackson__________ 

 Celia M. Jackson 

 and 

 Richard DeNatale 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LensCrafters, Inc. and 

 EYEXAM of California, Inc. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Date: August 13, 2007 

Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 4:07-cv-02853-SBA Document 44 Filed 08/13/07 Page 3 of 3