Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02933/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02933-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROLANDO CASTILLO, 

 

Petitioner,

 v.

R.J. SUBIA,

 

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CV-06-2933 RHW JPH

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

TO TERMINATE STAY AND GRANT

MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION

AS MOOT 

BEFORE THE COURT is Respondent’s March 11, 2010, notice of

Mr. Castillo’s release on parole (Ct. Rec. 18). 

The court has considered the notice and the file herein. 

The court finds the petition is moot because Mr. Castillo 

has been granted the relief requested in his petition. He was 

granted parole and released from prison on February 22, 2010 (Ct.

Rec. 18). Accordingly, 

For the reasons stated above, IT IS RECOMMENDED, the

temporary stay (Ct. Rec. 17) be terminated and the Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus (Ct. Rec. 1) be DENIED as moot. 

 OBJECTIONS

 Any party may object to the magistrate judge’s proposed

findings, recommendations or report within fourteen (14) days

following service with a copy thereof. Such party shall file with

the Clerk of the Court all written objections, specifically

identifying the portions to which objection is being made, and the

basis therefor. Attention is directed to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e),

which adds another three (3) days from the date of mailing if

service is by mail. A district judge will make a de novo

determination of those portions to which objection is made and may

Case 2:06-cv-02933-RHW-JPH Document 19 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2

accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s determination.

The district judge need not conduct a new hearing or hear

arguments and may consider the magistrate judge’s record and make

an independent determination thereon. The district judge may also

receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate

judge with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(CC), and Fed.

R. Civ. P. 73. A magistrate judge’s recommendation cannot be

appealed to a court of appeals; only the district judge’s order or

judgment can be appealed.

The District Court Executive SHALL FILE this report and

recommendation and serve copies of it on the referring judge and

the parties.

 DATED this 15th day of March, 2010. 

s/ James P. Hutton 

 JAMES P. HUTTON

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-02933-RHW-JPH Document 19 Filed 03/16/10 Page 2 of 2