Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00427/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00427-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 423
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157
Cause of Action: 28:1334 Bankruptcy cases and proceedings under title 11

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CARLYLE’S MOTION FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME – Case No. 05-00427 JW

DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP 

Betty M. Shumener (SBN 137220) 

Henry H. Oh (SBN 187127) 

550 S. Hope Street, Suite 2300 

Los Angeles, California 90071-2631 

Telephone: 213 330-7700 

Facsimile: 213 330-7701 

E-mail: henry.oh@dlapiper.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CARLYLE FORTRAN TRUST 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re: 

3DFX INTERACTIVE, INC., a California 

corporation, 

Debtor, 

EIN: 77-0390421 

______________________________________

CARLYLE FORTRAN TRUST, a Maryland 

real estate investment trust, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

NVIDIA CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation; NVIDIA US INVESTMENT 

COMPANY, f/k/a TITAN ACQUISITION 

CORP. NO. 2, a Delaware corporation; 3DFX 

INTERACTIVE, INC., a California 

corporation; JEN-HSUN HUANG, an 

individual; JAMES C. GAITHER, an 

individual; A. BROOKE SEAWELL, an 

individual; WILLIAM J. MILLER, an 

individual; TENCH COXE, an individual; 

MARK A. STEVENS, an individual; HARVEY 

C. JONES, JR., an individual; STEPHEN H. 

PETTIGREW, an individual; CHRISTINE B. 

HOBERG, an individual; RICHARD A. 

HEDDLESON, an individual; GORDON A. 

CAMPBELL, an individual; JAMES WHIMS, 

an individual; JAMES L. HOPKINS, an 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 05-00427 JW 

Bankruptcy Case No. 02-55795 JRG 

Adversary Proceeding No. 03-5010 

Chapter 11 

[PROPOSED] ORDER (A) 

ENLARGING TIME TO FILE MOTION 

OPPOSING BILL OF COSTS, AND (B) 

ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

NVIDIA DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES 

[Civil Local Rule 6-3] 

Date: TBD 

Time: TBD 

Ctrm: 8 

Judge: Hon. James Ware 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:05-cv-00427-JW Document 197 Filed 12/28/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CARLYLE’S MOTION FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME – Case No. 05-00427 JW 

individual; SCOTT D. SELLERS, an 

individual; ALEX M. LEUPP, an individual, 

and DOES 14, 15, and 18 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants. 

______________________________________

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case 5:05-cv-00427-JW Document 197 Filed 12/28/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CARLYLE’S MOTION FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME – Case No. 05-00427 JW

ORDER

After reviewing the papers, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby 

GRANTS the Motion of Carlyle Fortran Trust (“Carlyle”) For (A) Order Enlarging Time To File 

Motion Opposing Bill Of Costs, And (B) Order Enlarging Time To Respond To nVidia 

Defendants’ Motion For Attorneys’ Fees. 

The Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule: 

• ______________________: Last day for Carlyle to file a Motion 

contesting the nVidia Defendants’ Bill of Costs. 

• ______________________: Last day for Carlyle to file an Opposition to 

nVidia Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and for the nVidia 

Defendants to file an Opposition to Carlyle’s Motion contesting the nVidia 

Defendants’ Bill of Costs. 

• ______________________: Last day for Carlyle to file a Reply to the 

nVidia Defendants’ Opposition to Carlyle’s Motion contesting the nVidia 

Defendants’ Bill of Costs and for the nVidia Defendants to file a Reply to 

Carlyle’s Opposition to the nVidia Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ 

Fees. 

• ______________________ at 9 a.m.: Hearing of the nVidia Defendants’ 

Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Carlyle’s Motion contesting the nVidia 

Defendants’ Bill of Costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: 

 United States District Court Judge 

March 5, 2007 March 19, 2007 March 26, 2007 April 9, 2007 December 28, 2006

Case 5:05-cv-00427-JW Document 197 Filed 12/28/06 Page 3 of 3