Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04996/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04996-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING & EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE ADR NON-BINDING ARBITRATION

Brett A. Pedersen, SBN 146341 

Brett Pedersen & Associates 

Attorneys At Law 

One Maritime Plaza, Suite 400 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 434-3101 

Facsimile: (415) 434-6336 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AIRBORN OPERATING, L.P. 

VAUGHT & BOUTRIS, LLP 

John R. Vaught, SBN 114590 

Basil J. Boutris, SBN 122758 

Attorneys at Law 

80 Swan Way, Suite 320 

Oakland, CA 94621 

Telephone: (510) 430-1518 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MARVIN WILCHER and SHARISSE LANAUX 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AIRBORN OPERATING, L.P., a Texas 

limited partnership, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

ERIK-A ELECTRONICS., a California 

corporation; TAYLOR ELECTRONICS, 

INC., a business entity, form unknown; 

SHARISSE LANAUX; SHARISSE 

LANAUX; and DOES 1 through 10, 

Defendants.

Case No. C 04-04996 JL ARB 

STIPULATION REQUESTING AN ORDER 

CHANGING & EXTENDING TIME TO 

COMPLETE ADR NON-BINDING 

ARBITRATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Judge: Hon. James Larson 

Dept: Courtroom F, 15th Floor 

Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 74 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 76 Filed 08/12/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING & EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE ADR NON-BINDING ARBITRATION

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, 

Plaintiff AIRBORN OPERATING L.P. and Defendants SHARISSE LANAUX and MARVIN 

WILCHER submit the following Stipulation Requesting An Order Changing & Extending Time 

To Complete ADR Non-Binding Arbitration.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff AIRBORN OPERATING L.P. 

(“AirBorn”) and Defendants SHARISSE LANAUX (“Lanaux”) and MARVIN WILCHER 

(“Wilcher”) by and through their respective attorneys of record in order to extend the time for all 

non-defaulting parties to complete Court ordered non-binding Arbitration, as follows: 

1. The underlying Complaint for Damages (Demand for Jury Trial) was filed on 

November 24, 2004. 

3. On June 8, 2005, Plaintiff AIRBORN OPERATING L.P. filed a motion to amend 

its original complaint to join newly discovered additional parties Premier Capital Investors, 

Premier Financial Associates, Ambassador Electronics, Summit Financial Resources, and 

Charisse Lanaux. Such motion noticed a hearing date of July 20, 2005.

4. Because of court scheduling conflicts, the hearing on Plaintiff AIRBORN’s June 8, 

2005 motion to amend its complaint was moved from July 20, 2005 to August 10, 2005 by 

Clerk’s Notice dated June 27, 2005.

5. As no opposition was filed, on August 2, 2005, Judge Larson granted Plaintiff’s 

motion to amend without the necessity of hearing. 

6. The current ADR non-binding Arbitration deadline in the above captioned matter 

is August 30, 2005 and Arbitration is currently scheduled for August 24- 25, 2005.

7. Under the current ADR order, the parties’ Arbitration briefs for the August 24, 

2005 non-binding Arbitration are due on August 15, 2005.

8. The proposed new parties can not reasonably be served with the amended 

complaint by August 15, 2005 and participation in Arbitration without all the interested or 

necessary parties will not be effective or judicially efficient. Even if all proposed new parties 

could be served, their respective responses to Plaintiff AIRBORN’s amended complaint would 

not be due until after the current August 30, 2005 Arbitration completion date, approximately 40 

Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 74 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 76 Filed 08/12/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING & EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE ADR NON-BINDING ARBITRATION

to 50 days under FRCP 4(e), FRCP 12, and CCP § 415.10 et al (some parties which Plaintiff 

seeks to add are out of state). 

9. Because of the issues surrounding the various individual and business entity 

defendants and various motions, 1) the parties have not yet participated in a case management 

conference, 2) the parties’ June 1, 2005 Joint Case Management Statement and Proposed Order 

are out-dated; 3) no current case management order is in place, 4) the parties proposed discovery 

plan has not been approved and ordered by the Court, and 5) as a result no formal discovery has 

taken place. 

10. A stipulation requesting an order changing time for completion of the ADR nonbinding Arbitration deadline is necessary because of calendaring, case management, and 

discovery issues detailed in Paragraphs 1-9 of this stipulation.

11. The undersigned Plaintiff and Defendants do freely stipulate to complete Court 

ordered non-binding Arbitration before January 31, 2006. 

12. The undersigned Plaintiff and Defendants do freely stipulate to participate in Court 

ordered non-binding Arbitration on December 14-15, 2005. 

13. The undersigned Plaintiff and Defendants do freely stipulate to December 7-8, 

2005 and January 18-19, 2006 as alternative dates for participation in Court ordered non-binding 

Arbitration.

14. The undersigned Plaintiff and Defendants do freely stipulate that Arbitration 

Briefs shall be submitted 10 calendar days before the date of the Court ordered non-binding 

Arbitration.

15. This stipulation to request an extension of time for all non-defaulting parties to 

complete Court ordered non-binding Arbitration shall have no other effect on the continued 

prosecution of this matter. 

///

///

///

///

Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 74 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 3 of 4 Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 76 Filed 08/12/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING & EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE ADR NON-BINDING ARBITRATION

Dated: August 8, 2005 BRETT PEDERSEN & ASSOCIATES 

By: /s/ Brett A. Pedersen 

Brett A. Pedersen 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AIRBORN OPERATING, L.P. 

Dated: August 8, 2005 VAUGHT & BOUTRIS, LLP 

By: /s/ Jon R. Vaught 

Jon R. Vaught 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MARVIN WILCHER and SHARISSE 

LANAUX.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the attached stipulation, it is ORDERED, that the said stipulation 

be and hereby is approved and that the time for all non-defaulting parties to complete Court 

ordered non-binding Arbitration is hereby extended to and including the day of January 31, 2006.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:______________

Honorable James Larson 

United States District/ Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 74 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 4 of 4

August 12, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge James Larson

Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 76 Filed 08/12/05 Page 4 of 4