Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05808/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05808-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S UNOPP. Case No.: 13-cv-05808-HSG

MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)

pandre@kramerlevin.com

LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)

lkobialka@kramerlevin.com 

JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)

jhannah@kramerlevin.com 

HANNAH LEE (State Bar No. 253197)

hlee@kramerlevin.com

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS

& FRANKEL LLP

990 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 752-1700

Facsimile: (650) 752-1800

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FINJAN, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

PROOFPOINT, INC., and ARMORIZE 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendants. 

Case No.: 13-cv-05808-HSG

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF 

FINJAN, INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION 

TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON 

FINJAN, INC.’s MOTION TO REQUIRE 

DEFENDANTS TO CONFORM TO THE 

COURT’S NOVEMBER 14, 2014 CASE 

MANAGEMENT ORDER AND STRIKE 

THEORIES NOT DISCLOSED IN 

INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 239 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 2
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S UNOPP. Case No.: 13-cv-05808-HSG

MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s (“Finjan”) Unopposed Motion to Shorten Time for Hearing on Finjan’s 

Motion to Require Defendants to Conform to the Court’s November 14, 2014 Case Management 

Order and Strike Theories Not Disclosed in Invalidity Contentions (“Finjan’s Motion”) was brought 

before this Court. Upon consideration of Finjan’s Motion, the Declaration of Hannah Lee filed in 

support of the motion, and the case file in this action, the Court finds there to be good cause to grant 

Finjan’s Motion. 

Therefore, Finjan’s Motion to Shorten Time is GRANTED. Finjan’s Motion will be heard on 

December 17, 2015, and the parties shall comply with the following briefing schedule:

 November 20, 2015: Finjan files Motion

 December 4, 2015: Deadline for Defendants’ Opposition to Motion

 December 7, 2015: Deadline for Finjan’s Reply to Motion

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 24, 2015 ___________________________

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 239 Filed 11/24/15 Page 2 of 2