Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01527/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01527-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

[TCDOC:2672-13-325625.1] CIV. S-02-1527 DAD 

STIPULATION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HANCOCK ROTHERT &

BUNSHOFT LLP 

P.O. BOX 7199 

TAHOE CITY, CA 96145 

(530) 583-7767

JOHN E. FAGAN, ESQ. (SBN: 107974) 

JILL HALEY PENWARDEN, ESQ. (SBN: 178561) 

MICHAEL L. REITZELL, ESQ. (SBN: 215272) 

HANCOCK ROTHERT & BUNSHOFT LLP 

The Lighthouse Center 

850 North Lake Boulevard, Suite 15 

Post Office Box 7199 

Tahoe City, California 96145-7199 

Telephone: (530) 583-7767 

Facsimile: (530) 581-3215 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SQUAW VALLEY SKI CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MATTHEW P. PAXTON, KRIS MILLER 

PAXTON, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SQUAW VALLEY SKI CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No. CIV. S-02-1527 DAD 

STIPULATION TO STAY 

ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT 

Action Filed: July 12, 2002 

Trial Date: May 9, 2005 

Judgment Entered: May 26, 2005 

 

Plaintiffs Matthew P. Paxton and Kris Miller Paxton (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant 

Squaw Valley Ski Corporation (“Squaw Valley”), through their respective counsel, stipulate as 

follows: 

1. The district court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiffs on May 26, 2005. 

2. Squaw Valley filed a Motion for New Trial on June 10, 2005. 

3. The district court heard Squaw Valley’s Motion for New Trial on July 15, 

2005. 

4. On August 19, 2005, the trial court entered an order denying Squaw 

Valley’s Motion for New Trial. 

5. Plaintiffs will not enforce the judgment until September 19, 2005. See Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 62(c) 

Case 2:02-cv-01527-DAD Document 157 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 2
CIV. S-02-1527 DAD 

STIPULATION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT

[TCDOC:2672-13-325625.1] 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HANCOCK ROTHERT &

BUNSHOFT LLP 

P.O. BOX 7199 

TAHOE CITY, CA 96145 

(530) 583-7767

6. Defendant intends to file a Notice of Appeal on or before September 19, 

2005. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 

DATED: August 25, 2005 HANCOCK ROTHERT & BUNSHOFT LLP 

By: /s/ Michael L. Reitzell 

Michael L. Reitzell 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 SQUAW VALLEY SKI CORPORATION 

DATED: August 25, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE S. OSTERMAN 

By: /s/ David A. May 

David A. May 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

MATTHEW P. PAXTON AND KRIS 

MILLER PAXTON 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(c) and the above stipulation of the 

parties, the district court hereby stays execution of, or any proceedings to enforce, the judgment 

until September 19, 2005. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(c); Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal Practice & 

Procedure: Civil 2d § 2904 (“When there is reason to believe that an appeal will be taken, there is 

no reason why the court should not make an order preserving the status quo during the expected 

appeal. The order can be conditioned on an appeal being taken by a stated date.”). 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 2, 2005

Ddad1/orders.consent/paxton1527.stipord 

Case 2:02-cv-01527-DAD Document 157 Filed 09/02/05 Page 2 of 2