Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-04-03665/USCOURTS-ca8-04-03665-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3665

___________

Berry Allen Willis, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Centennial Mortgage & Funding, Inc.; *

Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel; Wells * [UNPUBLISHED]

Fargo Bank of Minnesota; James C. *

Bernstein; Bonnie J. Polta; Daniel M. *

Gallatin; Chris Lubin; Minnesota *

Department of Commerce; Hennepin *

County District Court; State of *

Minnesota Office of Administrative *

Hearings; Sharon Denise Atkinson; *

RSKCO, a CNA Company of *

Minnesota; Trent E. Bowman; Al *

Gelschus; Apex Appraisal Services, *

Inc., c/o Kathleen A. Midthum; *

Forsythe Appraisal, c/o Tim Forsythe; *

Holly Hollister; Kathleen A. Midthum; *

Tim Forsythe; Shara Mras, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 7, 2006

Filed: April 11, 2006

___________

Appellate Case: 04-3665 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/11/2006 Entry ID: 2031182
1

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 

-2-

Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Berry Allen Willis appeals the district court’s1

 judgment, in part dismissing for

failure to state a claim and in part granting summary judgment against him, in his

action under federal civil rights provisions and state law. Having conducted de novo

review of the record, see S.J. v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 294 F.3d 1025, 1027

(8th Cir. 2002) (summary judgment); Atkinson v. Bohn, 91 F.3d 1127, 1128 (8th Cir.

1996) (per curiam) (dismissal for failure to state claim), we find the district court’s

analysis to be thorough and well reasoned, and we reject Willis’s baseless arguments

for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Willis’s

pending motion.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 04-3665 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/11/2006 Entry ID: 2031182