Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05569/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05569-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARL A. MOST, III, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

WARDEN ANDREWS, TCI, TAFT, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:03-cv-05569-REC-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 21)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On March 29, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and

Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DENIED, and that judgment be entered in favor of respondent. This

Report and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained

notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days

from the date of service of that order. On April 11, 2005,

Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

Case 1:03-cv-05569-REC-DLB Document 24 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the

Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed March 29, 2005, is

ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court ENTER judgment in favor of Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05569-REC-DLB Document 24 Filed 05/18/05 Page 2 of 2