Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03605/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03605-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. C 05-03605 JW -1-

KEVIN V. RYAN (CSBN 118321)

United States Attorney

JOANN M.. SWANSON (CSBN 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

CLAIRE T. CORMIER (CSBN 154364)

Assistant United States Attorney

150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900

San Jose, California 95113

Telephone: (408) 535-5082

FAX: (408) 535-5081

claire.cormier@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Federal Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

INDEPENDENT ROOFING

CONTRACTORS COUNCIL

APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING TRUST

FUND ex rel, ROYAL ROOFING, INC.,

Petitioner,

v.

ELAINE CHAO, in her official capacity as

Secretary of Labor, and the UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

 

Respondents,

ROOFERS UNION LOCAL NO. 81,

Intervenor.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 05-03605 JW (HRL)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REVISING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE 

The parties to this action hereby stipulate and request as follows:

Plaintiff filed this action on September 7, 2005. The parties previously stipulated to a

briefing schedule that included an August 7, 2006 due date for the filing of reply memoranda in

support of summary judgment motions. Defendant has requested a one week extension to that

deadline due to the unavailability of certain personnel involved in preparing the motion. 

According, the parties request the following changes to the briefing schedule for this case.

Case 5:05-cv-03605-JW Document 26 Filed 07/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. C 05-03605 JW -2-

August 14, 2006 (previously August 7, 2006): File reply, if desired, to defendant’s

motion. File oppositions to counter-motions, if any.

August 28, 2006 (previously August 21, 2006): File optional replies to counter-motions,

if any.

As anticipated by Rule 16-5, the matter would then be deemed submitted unless the Court

requests further briefing or oral argument.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: July 21, 2006 KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

 /s/ 

CLAIRE T. CORMIER

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: July 21, 2006 THIERMAN LAW FIRM

 /s/ 

MARK THIERMAN

Attorneys for Petitioner

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD

DATED: July 21, 2006 /s/ 

CAREN P. SENCER

DAVID ROSENFELD

Attorneys for Intervenor

PROPOSED ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: July 26, 2006 _________________________________________

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-03605-JW Document 26 Filed 07/26/06 Page 2 of 2