Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02299/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02299-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Contitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. 2:05-CV-02299-MCE-EFB 

18177-0148/LEGAL13748726.1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DAVID R. ONGARO, State Bar No. 154698 

DAVID R. BURTT, State Bar No. 201220 

JONMI N. KOO, State Bar No. 233136 

PERKINS COIE LLP

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 344-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 344-7050 

Attorneys for Defendant 

STARBUCKS CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAMELA LYNN RUX, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a 

Washington corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:05-CV-02299-MCE-EFB 

ORDER MODIFYING SECOND 

AMENDED FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER 

Local Rule 16-283 

Action filed: November 14, 2005 

Trial date: February 4, 2008 

Defendant Starbucks Corporation’s (“Starbucks”) Ex Parte Application for Order 

Modifying Second Amended Final Pretrial Order came before this Court on November 27, 2007. 

Upon consideration of this Application, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support 

thereof, and the supporting declaration, the Court finds good cause exists to modify the Pretrial 

Order. Good cause having been shown, the Court orders as follows: 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:05-cv-02299-MCE -EFB Document 87 Filed 11/29/07 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL ORDER 

Case No. 2:05-CV-02299-MCE-EFB 

18177-0148/LEGAL13748726.1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to file her opposition to the Starbucks Motion 

in Limine Regarding the Admissibility of Certain Evidence Regarding its Alleged Preferential 

Treatment of Similarly Situated Heterosexual Employees by December 7, 2007, Starbucks is to 

file its reply by December 14, 2007, and the Court shall hold a hearing (to the extent the Court 

deems necessary) on January 11, 2008 at 9:00 a.m.. 

Dated: November 28, 2007 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cv-02299-MCE -EFB Document 87 Filed 11/29/07 Page 2 of 2