Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01619/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01619-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 891
Nature of Suit: Agricultural Acts
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ALL DATES RE THE PARTIES 

RESPECTIVE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGEMENT AND ORDER THEREON

BRIAN C. LEIGHTON, CA BAR # 090907

701 Pollasky Avenue

Clovis, California 93612

Telephone: (559) 297-6190

Facsimile: (559) 297-6194

Attorney for THE AMERICAN HONEY

PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

KRISTI C. KAPETAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

United States Courthouse, Suite 4401

2500 Tulare Street

Fresno, CA 93721

Telephone: (559) 497-4000

Facsimile: (559) 497-4099

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AT FRESNO

THE AMERICAN HONEY PRODUCERS ) CASE NO: 1:05-CV-01619-AWI-SMS

ASSOCIATION, INC., an Oklahoma )

corporation; et al ) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

) ALL DATES RE THE PARTIES

Plaintiffs, ) RESPECTIVE CROSS-MOTIONS

) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. ) AND ORDER THEREON

)

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF )

AGRICULTURE, )

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________)

This is the parties second stipulation to continue all dates re the parties respective cross-motions

for summary judgment and order thereon. The reason why the continuance of all dates is necessary now

is because of oversight in that the United States Department of Agriculture had not transmitted to the

Court or the parties the entire administrative record in this matter. The parties’ cross-motions for

summary judgment must refer to the administrative record, as new evidence is not permissible. The

Case 1:05-cv-01619-LJO -SMS Document 14 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ALL DATES RE THE PARTIES 

RESPECTIVE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGEMENT AND ORDER THEREON 2

parties spoke about this matter on September 14, 2006 after having noted that there is no administrative

record because one was not transmitted by USDA to the parties or the Court.

It is the parties’ understanding that USDA will forthwith transmit the administrative record to

the Court and to the parties so that the cross-motions for summary judgment can be filed. The parties

have agreed that all of the previous scheduling dates should be continued for a period of sixty (60) days.

THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE to the following briefing schedule

regarding cross-motions for summary judgment:

1. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment would be filed on or before November 15,

2006;

2. Defendant’s opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment would be filed on or

before December 20, 2006;

3. Plaintiffs’ reply and opposition to Defendant’s cross-motion would be filed on or before

January 12, 2007;

4. Defendant’s reply would be filed on or before February 16, 2007; and

5. The oral argument on said cross-motions would be heard before the Honorable Judge

Anthony W. Ishii on March 5, 2007 or as soon thereafter as the Court is available.

Dated: September 14, 2006

 /S/ BRIAN C. LEIGHTON 

BRIAN C. LEIGHTON, Attorney for

Plaintiffs

Dated: September 14, 2006

 /S/ KRISTI C. KAPETAN 

Kristi C. Kapetan, Attorney for

Defendant

ORDER

Based upon the parties stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the briefing and hearing

schedule be continued as follows:

Case 1:05-cv-01619-LJO -SMS Document 14 Filed 09/18/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ALL DATES RE THE PARTIES 

RESPECTIVE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGEMENT AND ORDER THEREON 3

1. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment would be filed on or before November 15,

2006;

2. Defendant’s opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment would be filed on or

before December 20, 2006;

3. Plaintiffs’ reply and opposition to Defendant’s cross-motion would be filed on or before

January 12, 2007;

4. Defendant’s reply would be filed on or before February 16, 2007; and

5. The oral argument on said cross-motions would be heard before the Honorable Judge

Anthony W. Ishii on March 5, 2007 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01619-LJO -SMS Document 14 Filed 09/18/06 Page 3 of 3