Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06100/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06100-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-C06-06100 CW 

SF1 1460772v.1

PETER H. KANG (SBN 158101) 

pkang@sidley.com

ROBERT B. MORRILL (SBN 35488) 

rmorrill@sidley.com

MATTHEW T. POWERS (SBN 124493) 

mpowers@sidley.com

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-7200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Attorneys for Defendant 

LG ELECTRONICS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LG ELECTRONICS, INC., 

Defendant. 

 Case No.: CV-C06-06100 CW 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT LG 

ELECTRONICS, INC. TO ANSWER, 

PLEAD OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT AND ORDER GRANTING 

REQUEST (CIVIL L.R. 6-2, 16-2(D))

 

 WHEREAS, plaintiff Silicon Graphics, Inc. (“SGI”), filed its Complaint in 

this action on September 28, 2006; 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Minute Order and Case Management Order of 

12/27/06 the Case Management Conference in the above captioned matter was set for 

February 2, 2007; 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the minute Order and Case Management Order of 

12/27/06, the time for Defendant LG Electronics, Inc. (“LGE”) to file a responsive 

pleading was extended to February 5, 2007; 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order Granting Stipulated Request to 

Continue Case Management Conference and Extend Time for Defendant LG Electronics, 

Case 4:06-cv-06100-CW Document 19 Filed 05/08/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-C06-06100 CW 

SF1 1460772v.1

Inc. to Answer, Plead or Otherwise Respond to Complaint of February 1, 2007, the time 

for LGE to file a responsive pleading was extended to April 6, 2007 and the Case 

Management Conference was continued to April 20, 2007; 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order Granting Stipulated Request to 

Continue Case Management Conference and Extend Time for Defendant LG Electronics, 

Inc. to Answer, Plead or Otherwise Respond to Complaint of April 9, 2007, the time for 

LGE to file a responsive pleading was extended to May 7, 2007, and the Case 

Management Conference was continued to June 5, 2007 at 2:00 p.m.;

 WHEREAS, the parties have been and continue to be actively discussing a 

resolution that would resolve the issues in the lawsuit, and have now decided to defer 

litigation of this matter by seeking a stay of this case pending the resolution of related 

cases No. C 01-01375, et al., and need additional time to formalize the terms of a 

stipulation to that effect; 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), the parties agree that LGE 

should be permitted a fourteen (14) day extension of time to answer, plead or otherwise 

respond to the Complaint, and respectfully request that the Court order LGE’s responsive 

pleading be due on or before May 21, 2007; 

 WHEREFORE, the parties, by and through their respective undersigned 

counsel, respectfully request the Court extend the date for LGE to file its responsive 

pleading as stipulated above. 

 

Case 4:06-cv-06100-CW Document 19 Filed 05/08/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-C06-06100 CW 

SF1 1460772v.1

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

 By: __/s/ Robert B. Morrill____________

Dated: May 7, 2007 

Attorneys for Defendant LG ELECTRONICS, INC., 

Dated: May 7, 2007 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

By: ___/s/ _Ronald S. Lemieux_______________ 

Attorneys for Plaintiff SILICON GRAPHICS, INC. 

Filer’s Attestation: Matthew T. Powers hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from all signatories. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 8 ,2007 ________________________________________________ 

 Honorable Judge Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Judge 

Case 4:06-cv-06100-CW Document 19 Filed 05/08/07 Page 3 of 3