Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00275/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00275-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sammy Williams, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Perkins, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-00275-PHX-EHC

ORDER

On January 23, 2006, Petitioner Sammy Williams ("Petitioner") filed a timely Petition

for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. 1). Respondents filed an

Answer to Petitioner's Petition on June 29, 2006. (Dkt. 13). On August 16, 2006, Magistrate

Judge Mark E. Aspey issued a Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. 14). Petitioner filed his

Objections to the Report and Recommendation on September 5, 2006. (Dkt. 15). 

Standard of Review

A district court judge reviews a Report and Recommendation of a Magistrate Judge

de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Discussion

The Court having reviewed the record de novo, including the Objections filed by the

Petitioner, adopts in full the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and

incorporates the same as part of this Order.

Case 2:06-cv-00275-EHC Document 16 Filed 02/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is

ADOPTED in full. (Dkt. 14). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petitioner's Objections to the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are DENIED. (Dkt. 15). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DENIED. (Dkt. 1)

DATED this 31st day of January, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00275-EHC Document 16 Filed 02/06/07 Page 2 of 2