Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02755/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02755-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIP. 

REQUESTING EXT. OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. CV-13-2755 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DESHON MARMAN

Plaintiffs,

v.

US AIRWAYS, an Arizona Corporation; 

DOMINIC CURRIERI, PHYLLIS GUSSDAVIS, JOHANNA ELLISON and John & 

Jane Does 3-10 (airline employees); Officer 

CALVIN TOM, #821, police officer, John 

& Jane DOES 11-30 (police officers and/or 

municipalities), and the CITY AND 

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Defendants.

Case No. CV-13-2755 CRB 

ORDER GRANTING SECOND JOINT 

STIPULATION REQUESTING 

EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

ON DEFENDANTS US AIRWAYS, INC., 

DOMINIC CURRIERI, PHYLLIS GUSSDAVIS AND JOHANNA ELLISON’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:13-cv-02755-CRB Document 56 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIP. 

REQUESTING EXT. OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. CV-13-2755 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This Court has reviewed the Parties’ Second Joint Stipulation Requesting Extension of 

Briefing Schedule on Defendants US Airways, Inc., Dominic Currieri, Phyllis Guss-Davis and 

Johanna Ellison’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Good cause appearing therein, it is hereby 

ordered that the schedule is revised as follows:

Airline Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment

Due March 27, 2015

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion for 

Summary Judgment

April 17, 2015.

Airline Defendants’ Reply in 

Support of Summary Judgment

May 1, 2015.

Hearing on Airline Defendants’ 

Motion for Summary Judgment

May 15, 2015, or as soon thereafter 

as the Court may decide.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2015 ______________________________________

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:13-cv-02755-CRB Document 56 Filed 03/11/15 Page 2 of 2