Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-01407/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-01407-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 10cv1407-IEG (AJB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID CARAVANTES, an individual,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 10-CV-1407 - IEG (AJB)

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

vs.

CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE

COMPANY, a California corporation;

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., a

Federal Savings Bank organied and existing

under the laws of the United States;

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a

National Banking Association organized and

exisitng under the laws of the United States;

CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, a Delaware

Limited Liability Company; VREJ

JOUKADARIAN, an individual; CLEMENT

J. DURKIN, an individual; DEBORAH

BRIGNAC, an individual; ANN THORN, an

indiviudal; and DOES 1-20, inclusive,

Defendants.

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order

and Order to Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction (“TRO Motion”), filed on July 6, 2010 at 12:53

p.m., seeking this Court’s order enjoining Defendants from proceeding with the Trustee’s Sale of

Plaintiff’s property. According to Plaintiff, the Trustee Sale was scheduled for July 6, 2010 at 10:00

a.m. (TRO Motion, Ex. 9.)

Case 3:10-cv-01407-CAB-MDD Document 3 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 10cv1407-IEG (AJB)

Rule 65(b)(1) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a temporary restraining order

may be issued without written or oral notice to the adverse party or its counsel only if there is a clear

showing of an “immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage.” In the present case, seeing as the

scheduled time for the Trustee’s Sale had already passed by the time Plaintiff filed his TRO Motion,

there is clearly no immediate injury or damage that can be prevented by issuance of a Temporary

Restraining Order. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s TRO Motion is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 6, 2010

IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Case 3:10-cv-01407-CAB-MDD Document 3 Filed 07/06/10 Page 2 of 2