Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04149/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04149-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Copyright Infringement

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TEESPRING, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRADLEY JOHN PUETZ,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-04149-VC 

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Re: Dkt. No. 51

Regarding the discovery dispute between the parties (Docket. No. 51), the Court rules as 

follows: 

Teespring's response to Interrogatory No. 3 is inadequate. The Interrogatory does not 

merely seek documents; it seeks information. Teespring is ordered to serve a comprehensive 

supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 3 on Puetz by Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. 

In addition, Teespring must provide Puetz with the documents requested in Interrogatory No. 3 

by that time. 

With respect to the remaining interrogatories, the Court assumes Teespring will fully 

respond within 60 days of February 29, 2016 and therefore orders no further relief.

Each side shall bear its own costs in this discovery dispute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 22, 2016

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-04149-VC Document 55 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 1