Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00838/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00838-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OCTAVIO HINOJOS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UEKERT, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00838-LJO-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY

DAYS WITHIN WHICH TO COMPLY WITH

THE COURT’S ORDER OF FEBRUARY 27,

2007, OR THE FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS THIS

ACTION WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE

DISTRICT JUDGE

(Doc. 12)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

SEND COURTESY COPY OF ORDER 10

AND COMPLAINT FORM TO PLAINTIFF

Plaintiff Octavio Hinojos (“plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 27, 2007, the court ordered

plaintiff to either file an amended complaint or notify the court of his willingness to proceed only

against defendants Broderick, Uekert, Alfaro, and Hope for the use of excessive physical force, in

violation of the Eighth Amendment. On April 20, 2007, after plaintiff failed to comply with or

otherwise respond to the order, the court issued findings and recommendations recommending

dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order. On May 9, 2007, plaintiff filed a notice of

change of address and request for an extension of time.

In the notice, plaintiff states that the court should send any correspondence to his mother’s

address in Long Beach. Plaintiff is required to keep the court informed of his current address of 

///

Case 1:06-cv-00838-LJO -LJO Document 13 Filed 06/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

record, which is the Los Angeles County Jail. The court will not mail correspondence concerning

this case to an address at which plaintiff is not located. 

The court will provide plaintiff with thirty additional days to respond to the court’s order of

February 27, 2007. If plaintiff fails to comply with the order, the findings and recommendations

issued on April 20, 2007, will be submitted to the district judge in this case for consideration. If

plaintiff complies with the court’s order of February 27, 2007, the court will vacate the findings and

recommendations.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff a courtesy copy of order number 10 and

a complaint form;

2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall comply

with the court’s order of February 27, 2007, by either filing an amended complaint

or notifying the court of his willingness to proceed only against defendants

Broderick, Uekert, Alfaro, and Hope for the use of excessive physical force; and

3. If plaintiff fails to comply with the court’s order of February 27, 2007, the findings

and recommendations recommending dismissal of this action will be submitted to the

district judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 14, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00838-LJO -LJO Document 13 Filed 06/14/07 Page 2 of 2