Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02555/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02555-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANDRE JAMAL ROBINSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MATTHEW CATE, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:11-cv-2555 MCE AC P 

ORDER 

 By order filed January 24, 2017, plaintiff was accorded until February 10, 2017 to file and 

serve an opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. See ECF No. 103. This 

extended date has passed but plaintiff has not filed an opposition or otherwise communicated with 

the court. The court has reviewed petitioner’s January 11, 2017 request for extended time which 

provides in part, ECF No. 102 at 2-3: 

Plaintiff did file an untimely opposition to defendant’s second 

motion for summary judgment on or about December 18, 2016, and 

was unable to access the law library to make a copy and serve on 

the defendant. . . . Plaintiff respectfully requests this court to . . . 

Accept untimely opposition to defendant’s second motion for 

summary judgment. 

Plaintiff is informed that the court is not in receipt of his opposition. Plaintiff’s last filing, prior 

to January 11, 2017, was on March 30, 2016 (ECF No. 95). 

 Due to the importance of the issues presented in this case, plaintiff will be accorded one 

Case 2:11-cv-02555-MCE-AC Document 105 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

final opportunity to oppose defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Failure to timely file 

such opposition will result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice for failure to prosecute. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. On or before March 10, 2017, plaintiff shall file his opposition to defendant’s pending 

motion for summary judgment (plaintiff need not serve a copy of his opposition on defendant). 

2. Within seven (7) days after plaintiff’s opposition has been filed in CM/ECF (see Local 

Rule 230(l)), defendant: (a) may file and serve a reply, and (b) shall file and serve a statement 

indicating whether he is amenable to convening a settlement conference to resolve plaintiff’s 

remaining requests for injunctive relief. 

3. Should plaintiff fail to timely file an opposition to defendant’s pending motion for 

summary judgment, this action will be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(b). 

SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 22, 2017 

Case 2:11-cv-02555-MCE-AC Document 105 Filed 02/23/17 Page 2 of 2