Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05094/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05094-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REMBRANDT PATENT

INNOVATIONS, LLC, and

REMBRANDT SECURE COMPUTING,

L.P.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

APPLE INC,

Defendant. /

No. C 14-05094 WHA (lead case)

No. C 14-05093 WHA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART

APPLE’S SEALING MOTION

Apple seeks to file under seal portions of the exhibits to its motion to compel because

portions of those exhibits have been designated “Restricted — Attorney’s Eyes Only” by

Rembrandt pursuant to the protective order in this action (Dkt. No. 141). Rembrandt has filed a

supporting declaration averring that certain information in the documents sought to be redacted

reflects confidential business information, such as the personal addresses of the inventors of the

patents-in-suit, deposition testimony describing Rembrandt’s business model, and the amounts

of royalty payments negotiated in licenses for the patents-in-suit (Dkt. No. 143). The exhibits

to the supporting declaration are new versions of the exhibits that Apple seeks to redact with

only the sensitive information redacted, rather than the entire documents. Good cause shown,

Apple’s sealing motion is GRANTED as to the information redacted in the exhibits to

Rembrandt’s supporting declaration and otherwise DENIED.

Case 3:14-cv-05094-WHA Document 144 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

If they have not already, the parties should not lodge further chambers copies of the

redacted versions documents for the purpose of this sealing motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 12, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-05094-WHA Document 144 Filed 01/12/16 Page 2 of 2