Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02306/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02306-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PACIFIC INFORMATION

RESOURCES, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

DIANA MUSSELMAN, et al.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-2306 MMC (BZ)

SECOND DISCOVERY ORDER

I held a telephonic conference on June 13, 2007, to

discuss the discovery dispute outlined in the Airon

Defendants’ Motion to Compel Discovery. All affected parties

were present and represented by counsel. For the reasons

articulated on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff and the Airon defendants shall meet and

confer in accordance with my Initial Discovery Order by June

22, 2007 in an effort to resolve their discovery disputes

consistent with the views expressed during the conference. 

2. Any supplemental responses to defendants’

interrogatories and requests for production must be served by

July 6, 2007.

Case 3:06-cv-02306-MMC Document 150 Filed 06/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. If defendants are not satisfied with plaintiff’s

supplemental responses, they may re-notice their Motion to

Compel Discovery no later than July 13, 2007. Defendants’

Motion to Compel must comply fully with Local Civil Rule 37-2

and specify which responses to interrogatories and requests

for production they wish to compel. 

4. Plaintiff’s opposition shall be filed by July 27,

2007. 

5. Defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed by August

3, 2007.

6. A hearing on the re-noticed motion will be held

August 15, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom G, 15th Floor,

Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,

California 94102.

7. If defendants choose not to re-notice the motion but

to supplement or modify their interrogatories the deadlines

established by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33 shall apply

and the pending motion will be denied as moot.

8. Defendants’ Motion To Compel Discovery (Docket No.

140) is DENIED AS MOOT. 

Dated: June 14, 2007

 Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\PACIFIC INFORMATION\DISC.ORD.2.wpd

Case 3:06-cv-02306-MMC Document 150 Filed 06/15/07 Page 2 of 2