Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00761/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00761-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHC SERVICES INC. dba )

SUPPLEMENTAL HEALTH CARE, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

ALL HEALTH SERVICES CORP., ALL )

HEALTH SERVICES, LLC., ROBERT )

A. GARCIA, DEBORAH G. MACKEY, )

and NADINE M. PEREZ-TURRIETTA, )

)

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F 06-0761 AWI DLB

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND

SETTING DATE FOR

HEARING THEREON

[Document # 6]

In this action for damages, injunctive relief, and accounting, plaintiff SHC Services, Inc.

(“Plaintiff”) has applied ex parte for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to prevent defendants

All Health Services Corp., et al. (“Defendants”) from appropriating and using trade secrets

belonging to Plaintiff. Pursuant to Rule 65(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a temporary

restraining order may be granted without notice to the adverse party only if: 1) it clearly appears

from specific facts shown by affidavit or verified complaint that immediate and irreparable

injury, loss or damage will result before the adverse party can be heard in opposition, and 2) the

applicant’s attorney certifies the reasons that notice should not be required. 

While Plaintiff’s application alleges it will be harmed if Defendant’s practices are not

restrained, the application does not allege reasons sufficient to issue such an order without notice

Case 1:06-cv-00761-AWI-DLB Document 10 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

to the opposing party or an opportunity to be heard. However, recognizing that the ongoing

nature of the harm Plaintiff alleges implies an urgent need for injunctive relief, the court will

direct briefing and schedule a hearing on the issue at the earliest practicable time.

THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that Defendants may file and serve an opposition to

Plaintiffs request for TRO not later than 4:00 p.m. Monday, June 26, 2006. If Defendant does

not oppose Plaintiffs request, Defendant shall file and serve a notice of non-opposition not later

than 4:00 p.m. Monday, June 26, 2006. Plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief not later than

4:00 p.m. Friday, June 30, 2006. Hearing on Plaintiff’s application for TRO shall be held at 1:30

p.m. on Monday, July 3, 2006, in department 2.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00761-AWI-DLB Document 10 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2