Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01544/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01544-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18:1836(a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

EDWARD ROE, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:19–cv–1544–WBS–KJN

ORDER LIFTING STAY OF DISCOVERY

(ECF No. 57)

On November 13, the undersigned stayed discovery in this case (with minor exceptions), 

as the operative pleadings were in flux.1 On January 30, 2020, District Judge Shubb ruled on 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, granting it in part as to two claims, but otherwise denying the 

motion. (See ECF No. 84.) Thus, Plaintiff now proceeds on nine claims against Defendants––

sounding in breach of contract, interference with contractual relations, trade secret, computer 

fraud, and breach of fiduciary duties. (See Id.) 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay of discovery (ECF No. 57) is 

LIFTED. Further, since Defendants have withdrawn their related Motion to Quash (ECF No. 76, 

85), the February 6, 2020 hearing on that motion is VACATED.

Dated: January 31, 2020

 

1 See ECF No. 53, “Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to dismiss”; 

ECF No. 57, “Order Granting in Part Motion to Stay Discovery”; ECF No. 61, the “First 

Amended Complaint”; ECF No. 68, “Defendants’ Second Motion to Dismiss”

Case 2:19-cv-01544-WBS-KJN Document 87 Filed 01/31/20 Page 1 of 1