Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01071/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01071-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1071

AARON HOLSEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SUNTRUST BANK, INCORPORATED; KOONS FORD OF BALTIMORE, 

INCORPORATED; JAMES E. KOONS, individually and as President 

of Koons Ford Inc.; WILLIAM R. HAGEN, individually and as 

Vice President for SunTrust Bank, Inc.; JOHNNY HARBUCK, 

individually and as Director of Consumer Lending Services; 

WENDY LINTON, individually and as general Sales Manager for 

Koons Ford; GOLDIE CAMPBELL, individually and as Business 

Manager for Koons Ford; PHIL CRUMP, individually and as 

Sales Consultant for Koons Ford, 

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District 

Judge. (1:09-cv-01717-WMN)

Submitted: March 31, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se. Bradford Scott Bernstein, MILES 

& STOCKBRIDGE, Rockville, Maryland; Brian M. Boyle, NEUBERGER,

Appeal: 10-1071 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/28/2010 Pg: 1 of 3
2

QUINN, GIELEN, RUBIN & GIBBER, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-1071 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/28/2010 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Holsey appeals the district court’s orders 

dismissing this action and denying Holsey’s motion for 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Holsey v. SunTrust Bank, Inc., No. 1:09-

cv-01717-WMN (D. Md. Dec. 16, 2009 & Jan. 7, 2010). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-1071 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/28/2010 Pg: 3 of 3