Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01352/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01352-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 310
Nature of Suit: Airplane Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 48:1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELANIE C. LATRONICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MERRILL LYNCH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:16-cv-01352-LJO-SAB

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

(ECF No. 1)

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Melanie Latronica, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on 

September 12, 2016. For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses Plaintiff‟s complaint 

with leave to amend. 

I.

SCREENING STANDARD

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court must dismiss a case if at any time the Court 

determines that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In 

determining whether a complaint fails to state a claim, the Court uses the same pleading standard 

used under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). A complaint must contain “a short and plain 

statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). 

Detailed factual allegations are not required, but “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause 

of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 

662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). 

Case 1:16-cv-01352-LJO-SAB Document 5 Filed 09/26/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to „state a claim 

to relief that is plausible on its face.‟” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678 (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 

570). “[A] complaint [that] pleads facts that are „merely consistent with‟ a defendant‟s liability . 

. . „stops short of the line between possibility and plausibility of entitlement to relief.‟” Iqbal, 

556 U.S. at 678 (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 557). Further, although a court must accept as 

true all factual allegations contained in a complaint, a court need not accept a plaintiff‟s legal 

conclusions as true. Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678. 

II.

DISCUSSION

Plaintiff states in her complaint that she is seeking an order directing Defendants to stop 

their ongoing crimes against Plaintiff and Plaintiff‟s family. (Compl. at 31, ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff 

also seeks an injunction to restore her to her original self and asks the Court to apprehend and 

prosecute some of the defendants. (Compl. at 7, 9.) Plaintiff names numerous defendants, 

including many private companies. (Compl. at 1-2, 4.) Plaintiff alleges violations of the Fourth, 

Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. (Compl. at 5.) Plaintiff 

also alleges violations of 47 U.S.C. § 533, 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)1-4, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 

1985. (Compl. at 3.) Plaintiff cites 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 1365, 1512, 1581, 1584, 1590-1597, 

1801, 2340, and 3771. (Compl. at 3, 6.) 

Plaintiff alleges that the reason for the action is “[t]orture, life deprivation, solar torture in 

UX bodies for the purpose of suicide nonstop since the beginning of 2012 after defendants 

already stole and destroyed 40 years of Plaintiff(s) life.” (Compl. at 3.) Plaintiff contends that 

she was stolen as a baby. (Compl. at 4.) Plaintiff alleges that she and her family were being 

switched and traded while in Los Banos, Merced, Sacramento, Fresno, Contra Costa County, and 

out of state. (Compl. at 5.) 

Although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure adopt a flexible pleading policy, a 

complaint must give fair notice and state the elements of the claim plainly and succinctly. Jones 

 

1

Page numbers refer to CM/ECF page numbers that are stamped at the top of the pages. 

Case 1:16-cv-01352-LJO-SAB Document 5 Filed 09/26/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

v. Community Redev. Agency, 733 F.2d 646, 649 (9th Cir. 1984). Plaintiff must allege with at 

least some degree of particularity overt acts which Defendants engaged in that support Plaintiff's 

claim. Id. The Court finds that Plaintiff‟s allegations are largely incomprehensible, are fanciful, 

and fail to state a cognizable claim. Therefore, Plaintiff‟s complaint must be dismissed. 

However, the Court will grant Plaintiff the opportunity to amend her complaint. 

III.

ORDER

For the reasons stated, Plaintiff‟s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may 

be granted. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days. Noll 

v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1448-49 (9th Cir. 1987). Plaintiff may not change the nature of this 

suit by adding new, unrelated claims in her amended complaint. George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 

607 (7th Cir. 2007) (no “buckshot” complaints). 

Plaintiff‟s amended complaint should be brief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Plaintiff should 

clearly and briefly set forth the facts in support of each claim and should supply the facts 

necessary to link the alleged violation of her constitutional right to acts or omissions of the 

Defendants. Plaintiff must identify how each individual defendant caused the deprivation of 

Plaintiff‟s rights: “The inquiry into causation must be individualized and focus on the duties and 

responsibilities of each individual defendant whose acts or omissions are alleged to have caused 

a constitutional deprivation.” Leer v. Murphy, 844 F.2d 628, 633 (9th Cir. 1988). However,

Plaintiff should not argue and should not set forth a lengthy description of immaterial facts.

With respect to exhibits, while they are permissible if incorporated by reference, Fed. R.

Civ. P. 10(c), they are not necessary in the federal system of notice pleading, Fed. R. Civ. P. 

8(a). In other words, it is not necessary at this stage to submit evidence to prove the allegations 

in Plaintiff‟s complaint because at this stage Plaintiff‟s factual allegations will be accepted as 

true. Although Plaintiff‟s factual allegations will be accepted as true and “the pleading standard 

Rule 8 announces does not require „detailed factual allegations,‟” “a complaint must contain 

sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to „state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.‟” 

Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678 (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555). “A claim has facial plausibility 

Case 1:16-cv-01352-LJO-SAB Document 5 Filed 09/26/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference 

that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678 (citing Twombly, 

550 U.S. at 556). 

Plaintiff is advised that an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. 

Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997); King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 

567 (9th Cir. 1987). The amended complaint must be “complete in itself without reference to the 

prior or superseded pleading.” Local Rule 220. Plaintiff is warned that “[a]ll causes of action 

alleged in an original complaint which are not alleged in an amended complaint are waived.” 

King, 814 F.2d at 567 (citing London v. Coopers & Lybrand, 644 F.2d 811, 814 (9th Cir. 1981)); 

accord Forsyth, 114 F.3d at 1474. Finally, Plaintiff is warned that if she states incomprehensible 

and fanciful allegations in her amended complaint, she will not be provided another opportunity 

to amend her complaint. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff‟s complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim;

2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file 

an amended complaint; and

3. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint in compliance with this order, this 

action will be dismissed for failure to state a claim. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01352-LJO-SAB Document 5 Filed 09/26/16 Page 4 of 4