Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01778/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01778-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIRENA TORRES, on behalf of herself and 

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PET EXTREME,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:13-cv-01778-LJO-SAB

ORDER AMENDING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF No. 25)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN 

DAYS

On January 15, 2015, this Court issued a findings and recommendations recommending 

granting final approval of the class action settlement in this action, and granting Plaintiff’s 

motion for attorney fees, costs, and class representative incentive award. In reviewing the 

findings and recommendations, the Court has found that although the caption advised the parties 

that objections were due within fourteen days, the Court inadvertently omitted the paragraph 

informing the parties within the document of the right to file objections. Accordingly, the 

findings and recommendations filed January 15, 2015 are HEREBY AMENDED at 23:6 to 

include the following.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the district judge assigned to this 

action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and this Court’s Local Rule 304. Within fourteen 

(14) days of service of this recommendation, any party may file written objections to these 

Case 1:13-cv-01778-LJO-SAB Document 26 Filed 02/05/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

findings and recommendations with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document 

should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The 

district judge will review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th 

Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01778-LJO-SAB Document 26 Filed 02/05/15 Page 2 of 2