Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00817/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00817-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Order Granting Defendants’ Ex Parte Application For An Order Granting Leave To Exceed Page Limit On 

Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment Or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication

(2:13-cv-00817-TLN-AC)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK PINDER,

Plaintiff,

v.

EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 

DEPARTMENT; RICHARD ROGERS; 

DAVID DERKS; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:13-cv-00817-TLN-AC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX 

PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER 

GRANTING LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE 

LIMIT ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, 

ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY 

ADJUDICATION

On July 27, 2015, Defendants Employment Development Department (“EDD”), Richard 

Rogers (“Rogers”), and David Derks (“Derks,” collectively “Defendants”) filed an Ex Parte 

Application For An Order Granting Leave To Exceed Page Limit On Defendants’ Motion For 

Summary Judgment Or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication. 

The Court, having read THE application and supporting papers, and for good cause 

appearing, hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Ex Parte Application For An Order Granting Leave To 

Exceed Page Limit On Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment Or, Alternatively, Summary 

Adjudication.

Case 2:13-cv-00817-TLN-DB Document 49 Filed 07/29/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Order Granting Defendants’ Ex Parte Application For An Order Granting Leave To Exceed Page Limit On 

Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment Or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication

(2:13-cv-00817-TLN-AC)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants may file an opening brief to their 

dispositive motion not to exceed 25 pages, and may file a reply brief not to exceed 15 pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2015

Case 2:13-cv-00817-TLN-DB Document 49 Filed 07/29/15 Page 2 of 2