Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00401/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00401-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANITA CONCEPCION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WORLD SAVINGS FINANCIAL, FSB, nka

WACHOVIA FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.;

WACHOVIA FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., A

WELLS FARGO COMPANY; WELLS FARGO

N.A., et al.

Defendants. /

No. C-10-CV-00401 EDL

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On February 4, 2010, Defendants Wachovia Financial Services, Inc., Wachovia Mortgage,

FSB (formerly known as World Savings Bank, FSB) and Wells Fargo N.A. filed a Motion to

Dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint and Motion to Strike portions of the complaint. These motions are set

for hearing on March 16, 2010. Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff’s

opposition briefs were due twenty-one days before the hearing date. Plaintiff has failed to file any

opposition. Further, Plaintiff has failed to either consent to this Court’s jurisdiction, or decline and

request reassignment to a district court judge, despite repeated requests to do so by Court staff.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed

for failure to prosecute or why the motions should not be granted as unopposed. Plaintiff’s response

to this Order to Show Cause shall be due no later than Thursday, March 4, 2010. If Plaintiff seeks to

file oppositions to Defendants’ motions, she must demonstrate good cause for her failure to comply

with the Local Rules and any request to file late opposition briefs also must be filed no later than

Case 3:10-cv-00401-EDL Document 10 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

March 4, 2010. Plaintiff is further ordered to file either a consent or declination to this Court’s

jurisdiction by no later than March 4, 2010.

It is further ordered that if Plaintiff fails to file a response to this Order to Show Cause by

March 4, 2010, the Court will recommend dismissal of the action without prejudice for failure to

prosecute. If Plaintiff files oppositions to Defendants’ Motions and consents to this Court’s

jurisdiction, any replies shall be filed no later than March 11, 2010 and a hearing on the motions will

be held on March 30, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 25, 2010 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:10-cv-00401-EDL Document 10 Filed 02/26/10 Page 2 of 2