Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00357/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00357-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Darnell Hines (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action against Defendants Ashrafe Youseff, Joshua 

Garza, Godwin Ugueze, Lynn Carmichael, and Barbara Newkirk on March 12, 2013. (Doc.1.) 

Because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute his claims against Lynn Carmichael and Barbara Newkirk, the 

Magistrate Judge recommended these defendants be dismissed. (Doc. 29.)

The parties were granted fourteen days from the date of service, or until February 14, 2014, to 

file objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 29 at 3.) In addition, Plaintiff was

“advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 

District Court’s order.” (Id. at 4, citing Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)). However, no 

objections were filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi 

Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo 

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and 

Recommendation are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

///

DARNELL T. HINES,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ASHRAFE E. YOUSEFF, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00357 - AWI - JLT

ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING 

DEFENDANTS LYNN CARMICHAEL AND 

BARBARA NEWKIRK 

Case 1:13-cv-00357-AWI-JLT Document 32 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January31, 2014 (Doc. 29) are ADOPTED 

IN FULL; 

2. Lynn Carmichael and Barbara Newkirk are DISMISSED as defendants; and

3. Plaintiff’s claims against Lynn Carmichael and Barbara Newkirk are DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the 

Court’s orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 19, 2014 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00357-AWI-JLT Document 32 Filed 02/19/14 Page 2 of 2