Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-02231/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-02231-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JENNIFER ALLAN, )

) NO. CV S-01-2231 GEB GGH

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 

) ORDER

CITY OF MARYSVILLE, et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

)

Plaintiff’s request for a continuance of the motion

Defendants filed on April 18, 2005, is denied. Defendants oppose the

request. The basis of the request is twofold: Plaintiff argues her

counsel will not be able to attend the May 31, 2005, scheduled hearing

on the motion and Plaintiff’s counsel will not have reasonable access

to a law library or the file in this case until he completes a trial

in Southern California.

The first basis is not a reason for the continuance because

the motion is determined to be suitable for decision without oral

argument. L.R. 78-230(h). The second basis is an unsupported

conclusory assertion, and therefore is insufficient to justify the

requested continuance.

Case 2:01-cv-02231-GEB -KJM Document 279 Filed 05/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the request is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 6, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:01-cv-02231-GEB -KJM Document 279 Filed 05/06/05 Page 2 of 2