Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02270/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02270-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC GUNDERSEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

LENNAR ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT

LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-2270 CRB (MEJ)

DISCOVERY ORDER RE CONTACT

INFORMATION DISPUTE

(DKT #65)

The Court is in receipt of the parties’ joint letter, filed May 5, 2010, regarding Plaintiff’s

request for Defendant Lenmar Associates Management (“Lenmar”) to disclose contact information

for putative class members in this alleged overtime misclassification case. (Dkt. #65.) Plaintiff

seeks the name, home address, and telephone number for all 462 current and former Lenmar

Assistant Construction Managers (“ACMs”) in California. Defendant argues that it has already

produced contact information for 47 ACMs, but Plaintiff has made little effort to substantiate his

allegations by contacting these putative class members.

Upon review of the parties’ arguments, the Court finds that Plaintiff has not shown why a

representative sample of 47 ACMs is not sufficient to substantiate his allegations. However, the

Court notes that the contact information for some of the 47 ACMs may no longer be valid. 

Accordingly, the Court shall permit Plaintiff the opportunity to obtain the contact information for a

representative sample of ACMs whose contact information is still valid. To facilitate this, the Court

ORDERS as follows: Plaintiff shall provide a list of those ACMs out of the 47 already provided

whose contact information is no longer valid, and Lenmar shall then provide contact information for

the same number of ACMs. The parties shall meet and confer to determine which ACMs’ contact

information shall be provided. Said production shall be on a statewide basis. 

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: May 26, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-02270-CRB Document 66 Filed 05/26/10 Page 1 of 1