Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00706/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00706-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUKIT N. KUMVACHIRAPITAG,

Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-00706-JST 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH 

PREJUDICE

Re: ECF No. 31

On May 13, 2016, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why this case should not 

be dismissed with prejudice. ECF No. 31. It noted that a prior motion to dismiss filed by 

Defendant had been granted on April 25, 2016 and that while Plaintiff had filed multiple 

documents since that date, none of them offered any amended allegations to support his claims. 

Id. Accordingly, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause, by May 27, 2016, why this case 

should not be dismissed with prejudice. Id.

Plaintiff responded by filing a document entitled “Motion to Show Cause,” on May 23, 

2016. ECF No. 33. As with Plaintiff’s prior filings, however, the motion is difficult to discern 

and contains no factual allegations, legal arguments, or conclusions. Instead, it refers to “ENTIRE 

INTERNETS BANKING AND MOBILES BANKING OF THE STOLEN AND THEFTS OF 

ENTIRE DIGITAL PRODUCTS TECHNOLOGIES, THE INFRINGEMENT OF MY 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES AND ENTIRE GREENS TECHNOLOGIES, ET. AL.,” and 

appears to request an order for the “entire banking systems,” the U.S. Federal Reserve, and the 

federal government to pay “$1,000,000,000,000.00+” into Plaintiff’s bank account. Id.

The Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to show cause why this case should not be 

dismissed. Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall close the file.

Case 3:16-cv-00706-JST Document 36 Filed 06/08/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 7, 2016

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-00706-JST Document 36 Filed 06/08/16 Page 2 of 2