Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00124/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00124-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS R. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DERRAL G. ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-00124-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

(Doc. 22)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF A THIRTYDAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN

OBJECTION TO THE FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS 

(Doc. 21)

Plaintiff Marcus R. Williams (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 9, 2006, the undersigned

issued a Findings andRecommendationsrecommending dismissal of certain claims and defendants,

with prejudice. On June 27, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion seeking an extension of time to file a

second amended complaint amending his claims.

Plaintiff was not directed to file a second amended complaint and may not have an extension

of time within which to do so. The Court has issued a Findings and Recommendations and

plaintiff’s recourse at this juncture is to file an objection. If plaintiff files a second amended

complaint, it will be stricken from the record.

///

///

Case 1:05-cv-00124-AWI-SMS Document 23 Filed 06/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a second amended complaint is

DENIED;

2. If plaintiff files a second amended complaint, it will be stricken from the record; and

3. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order to file an

objection, if any, to the Findings and Recommendations issued on June 9, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 29, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00124-AWI-SMS Document 23 Filed 06/29/06 Page 2 of 2