Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00200/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00200-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANPREET SINGH BAWA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-00200 WHA

REQUEST FOR 

FURTHER RESPONSE

The government has indicated that it does not oppose plaintiff’s request for dismissal

without prejudice. The Court is concerned, however, that dismissing the instant action may

render some of plaintiff’s claims, including the civil-rights claim, barred by the statute of

limitations. The Court further notes that plaintiff has, to date, filed administrative tort claims

with only U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 

He has not filed a claim with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the third agency

purportedly involved in the alleged conduct. If plaintiff files a claim with U.S.C.I.S., this may

necessitate further delay in bringing a new action. With these concerns in mind, plaintiff must

state by FRIDAY, JUNE 8, 2007, whether it remains his intent to dismiss the entire action without

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 5, 2007. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-00200-WHA Document 50 Filed 06/05/07 Page 1 of 1