Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01207/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01207-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-1207 GEB KJM P

vs.

J. KREJCHA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil

rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a number of documents asking that the court

assist him in obtaining the address of defendant Krejcha. From documents filed on September 6,

2005, it appears plaintiff has obtained defendant Krejcha’s address. Therefore plaintiff’s request

for assistance will be denied. Plaintiff has also filed a number of frivolous motions. Those will

be denied as well.

The court finds that plaintiff has abused the court process by filing several other

documents that either present repetitive material, include requests without a legal basis for the

request, or are simply inappropriate and not provided for by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

or this court’s Local Rules. Plaintiff is hereby warned that if he continues to abuse the court

process by filing repetitive, irrelevant or legally unsupported requests, he will be 

Case 2:03-cv-01207-GEB -KJM Document 53 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

sanctioned. Sanctions might include dismissal of this action, monetary fines or limitations on

plaintiff’s filings in this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s June 20, 2005 “discovery request” is denied;

2. Plaintiff’s June 20, 2005 “motion to enter local rule 34-250 . . .” is denied;

3. Plaintiff’s July 18, 2005 “motion to enter local rule 5-133(D) . . .” is denied;

4. Plaintiff’s July 22, 2005 “motion to enter local rule 5-133(D). . .” is denied; 

5. Plaintiff’s July 27, 2005 “motion for court order . . .” is denied;

6. Plaintiff’s August 8, 2005 “motion to enter local rule 43-142 . . .” is denied;

7. Plaintiff’s August 17, 2005 “motion to enter local rule 78-230(M) . . .” is

denied; and

8. Plaintiff’s September 6, 2005 “motion to enter local rule 4-210 . . .” is denied. 

DATED: October 25, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-01207-GEB -KJM Document 53 Filed 10/26/05 Page 2 of 2