Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01104/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01104-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION

Bingham McCutchen LLP

JASON A. YURASEK (SBN 202131)

MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE (SBN 223240)

ELIZABETH MILLER (SBN 239291)

Three Embarcadero Center

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067

Telephone: (415) 393-2000

Facsimile: (415) 393-2286

Attorneys for Plaintiff

BRENDA ALLEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

BRENDA ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:05-CV-01104-OWW-LJO

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO

EXTEND TIME TO OPPOSE

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO

DISMISS AND RELATED DATES, TO

FILE ONE OPPOSITION TO ALL

MOTIONS TO DISMISS, AND FOR

EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMIT

Based on the ex parte application of Plaintiff Brenda Allen for an extension

of time, to consolidate the opposition, and for an extension of the page limitation, and good

cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Hearing Date for all Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss now set for 10:00

a.m. on March 13, 2006 before Judge Wanger in Courtroom Three is continued to April 10,

2006 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge Wanger in Courtroom Three.

2. Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss will be filed no later

than March 17, 2006.

Case 1:05-cv-01104-OWW -GSA Document 47 Filed 02/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION

3. Defendants’ reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss

will be filed no later than March 31, 2006.

4. Plaintiff may file one consolidated opposition to all Defendants’ Motions to

Dismiss.

5. Plaintiff may exceed the 25 page page-limit in their consolidated opposition

to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss.

The brief shall not exceed __40______ pages.

DATED: _Feb. 13, 2006___ __/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER_____________

Oliver W. Wanger

United States District Court Judge

Case 1:05-cv-01104-OWW -GSA Document 47 Filed 02/16/06 Page 2 of 2