Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04290/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04290-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 2889507_1.DOC 

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS 

Case No. CV-05-4290-JSW 

BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838 (boris.feldman@wsgr.com) 

DOUGLAS J. CLARK, State Bar No. 171499 (dclark@wsgr.com) 

CHERYL W. FOUNG, State Bar No. 108868 (cfoung@wsgr.com) 

KELLEY E. MOOHR, State Bar No. 216823 (kmoohr@wsgr.com) 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Defendants 

PIXAR, STEVEN P. JOBS, 

EDWIN E. CATMULL and SIMON T. BAX 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE PIXAR SECURITIES LITIGATION 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 

ALL ACTIONS 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV-05-4290-JSW 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE 

LIMITS RE BRIEFING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

Case 3:05-cv-04290-JSW Document 62 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -1- 2889507_1.DOC 

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS 

Case No. CV-05-4290-JSW

WHEREAS, on May 26, 2006, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint for Violations of 

Federal Securities Laws (the “Amended Complaint”) in the above-entitled matter; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s March 23, 2006 and May 17, 2006 orders, and 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2)(D) and 6(a) and (e), defendants’ Pixar, Steven P. Jobs, 

Edwin E. Catmull and Simon T. Bax (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss is currently 

due June 29, 2006, plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss is currently due August 3, 

2006, and Defendants’ reply in support of Defendants’ motion to dismiss is currently due August 

28, 2006; 

WHEREAS, given the anticipated complex nature of the motion to dismiss the Amended 

Complaint under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, it is appropriate to follow Local 

Rules 7-2(b), 7-3(a), 7-3(c), and 7-4(b) concerning page limitations, rather than this Court’s 

Standing Order which limits opening, opposition, and reply briefs to 15 pages; 

WHEREAS, the parties hereby seek an extension to the page limits applicable under this 

Court’s standing order; and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Local Rules, Defendants’ memorandum in support of their 

motion to dismiss would not exceed 25 pages, plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss 

would not exceed 25 pages, and Defendants’ reply memorandum would not exceed 15 pages. 

THEREFORE, for the reasons described above, Defendants respectfully request that the 

Court allow the parties the additional pages provided under Local Rules 7-2(b), 7-3(a), 7-3(c), 

and 7-4(b). 

Dated: June 2, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. 

By: /s/ Kelley E. Moohr _______ 

 Kelley E. Moohr 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 3:05-cv-04290-JSW Document 62 Filed 06/02/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -2- 2889507_1.DOC 

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS 

Case No. CV-05-4290-JSW

Dated: June 2, 2006 MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD & SCHULMAN LLP 

By: /s/Karen T. Rogers_______ _______

 Karen T. Rogers 

 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss due June 29, 2006, shall not exceed 25 pages, plaintiff’s 

opposition to the motion to dismiss due August 3, 2006, shall not exceed 25 pages, and 

Defendants’ reply in support of Defendants’ motion to dismiss, due August 28, 2006, shall not 

exceed 15 pages. 

Dated: ____________ By: 

 THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

June 2, 2006

Case 3:05-cv-04290-JSW Document 62 Filed 06/02/06 Page 3 of 3