Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00479/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00479-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALVIN C. JOHNSON, No. 2:03-cv-0479-MCE-GGH-P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

TOM L. CAREY, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this application for a

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 26, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations as well as a request for leave to file late

objections. Good cause appearing, petitioner’s objections are deemed timely. Respondent has

also filed a reply to the objections.

///

Case 2:03-cv-00479-MCE -GGH Document 51 Filed 11/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304,

this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s October 18, 2006, application for leave to file late objections is granted;

petitioner’s objections are deemed timely;

2. The findings and recommendations filed September 26, 2006, are adopted in full; and

3 Petitioner’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a competency issue is

denied; and judgment is entered.

DATED: November 8, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-00479-MCE -GGH Document 51 Filed 11/08/06 Page 2 of 2