Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02752/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02752-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor

San Jose, CA 95113.2303

408.998.4150

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. CASE NO. 5-15-CV-2572(EJD)

Fourth Joint Stipulation To Continue Deadline For Defendant 

Motorola Mobility, LLC To Respond To Plaintiff’s Complaint

BENJAMIN A. EMMERT, Bar No. 212157

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

A Professional Corporation

50 West San Fernando Street

15th Floor

San Jose, CA 95113.2303

Telephone: 408.998.4150

Fax No.: 408.288.5686

Attorneys for Defendant 

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NIA MUJADADI-TYRAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC; 

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 5:15-CV-2752 (EJD)

FOURTH JOINT STIPULATION TO 

CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR 

DEFENDANT MOTOROLA MOBILITY, 

LLC TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward J. Davila

DATED: 11/10/2015

Case 5:15-cv-02752-EJD Document 32 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 3
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor

San Jose, CA 95113.2303

408.998.4150

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. CASE NO. 5-15-CV-2572(EJD)

Fourth Joint Stipulation To Continue Deadline For Defendant 

Motorola Mobility, LLC To Respond To Plaintiff’s Complaint

JOINT STIPULATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Nia Mujadadi-Turan (“Plaintiff”) and 

Defendant Motorola Mobility, LLC (“Motorola”) (Plaintiff and Motorola are referred to as the 

“Parties”), hereby jointly stipulate to a fourth extension of time for Motorola to respond to Plaintiff’s 

Complaint. Pursuant to the Parties Agreement, Motorola will respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or 

before December 9, 2015. In support of this Stipulation, the Parties agree and stipulate as follows: 

1. On June 18, 2015, Plaintiff initiated the present action against Motorola in the 

United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (See ECF, Doc. No. 1.) 

2. Motorola was served with the Summons and Complaint in this action on July 

21, 2015.

3. On August 11, 2015, the Parties agreed to a thirty (30) day extension for 

Motorola to respond to the Complaint. Pursuant to the stipulation, Motorola’s response to the 

Complaint was due on or before September 10, 2015.

4. On September 10, 2015, the Parties agreed to a second thirty (30) day 

extension for Motorola to respond to the Complaint. Pursuant to the stipulation, Motorola’s 

response to the Complaint was due on or before October 10, 2015.

5. On October 9, 2015, the Parties agreed to a third thirty (30) day extension for 

Motorola to respond to the Complaint. Pursuant to the stipulation, Motorola’s response to the 

Complaint was due on or before November 9, 2015.

6. On November 6, 2015, the Parties have agreed to a fourth thirty (30) day 

extension of time for Motorola to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Accordingly, Motorola’s 

response to the Complaint is now due on or before December 9, 2015.

7. This Stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already 

fixed by Court order. 

///

///

///

///

Case 5:15-cv-02752-EJD Document 32 Filed 11/10/15 Page 2 of 3
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor

San Jose, CA 95113.2303

408.998.4150

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. CASE NO. 5-15-CV-2572(EJD)

Fourth Joint Stipulation To Continue Deadline For Defendant 

Motorola Mobility, LLC To Respond To Plaintiff’s Complaint

8. This is the fourth extension of time sought in this matter.

We hereby attest that we have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any 

signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

Dated: November 9, 2015 /s/ Beth A. Davis Beth A. Davis

Attorneys for Plaintiff

NIA MUJADADI-TURAN

Dated: November 9, 2015

 /s/ Benjamin A. Emmert BENJAMIN A. EMMERT

LITTLER MENDELSON

Attorneys for Defendant 

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC

Firmwide:136860368.2 071264.1013

Case 5:15-cv-02752-EJD Document 32 Filed 11/10/15 Page 3 of 3