Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00726/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00726-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Gabriel Gomez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 17, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and 

Recommendations recommending that this action proceed on Plaintiff’s claims for damages under the 

Fourth and Eighth Amendments of the United States Constitution, and all other forms of relief be 

dismissed. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that 

objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On July 21, 2016, Plaintiff filed objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

GABRIEL GOMEZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

C. GIPSON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-00726-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, ALLOWING ACTION 

TO PROCEED ON CLAIM FOR DAMAGES 

AGAINST DEFENDANT BORGES, AND 

DISMISSING ALL OTHER FORMS OF RELIEF

[ECF Nos. 18 & 20]

Case 1:15-cv-00726-LJO-SAB Document 22 Filed 08/29/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on June 17, 2016, are adopted in full;

2. This action proceed on Plaintiff’s claims for damages against Defendant Borges for 

violations of the Fourth and Eighth Amendments; and

 3. Plaintiff’s requests for injunctive relief are DISMISSED from the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 26, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00726-LJO-SAB Document 22 Filed 08/29/16 Page 2 of 2