Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-00223/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-00223-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES MARTIN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-99-0223 WBS GGH P

vs.

S.L. HUBBARD, et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

In response to the order, filed on April 27, 2010, directing the parties to inform the

undersigned as to the status of respondent’s application for a writ of certiorari, counsel for both

parties confirm respondent filed a petition for a writ of cert. on February 17, 2010, with a

response due from petitioner on May 19, 2010. Counsel mutually seek a temporary stay of

proceedings in the district court while the petition for writ of certiorari is being briefed and

considered.

Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that a temporary stay of proceedings in

this court be granted pending the outcome of respondent’s petition for writ of certiorari before

the United States Supreme Court. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

Case 2:99-cv-00223-WBS-GGH Document 124 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within seven days after service of the objections. The parties are

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 10, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

mart0223.sta

Case 2:99-cv-00223-WBS-GGH Document 124 Filed 05/10/10 Page 2 of 2