Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00338/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00338-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 12:1461 Homeowners Loan Act

---

Stipulation and Order on Motion to Dismiss 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Charles D. Chalmers, Esq. (State Bar No. 50263) 

ALLEGIANCE LITIGATION 

851 Irwin Street, Suite 200 

Fairfax, California 94901 

Tel: (415) 860-8134 

Fax: (801) 382-2469 

cchalmers@allegiancelit.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff Claudine Chalmers 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

CLAUDINE CHALMERS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

SOLUTIONS PROCESSING, LLC; CRAIG 

M. LAVERTY, ESQ.; RYAN LAW FIRM; 

INDY MAC BANK, F.S.B.; KEYER 

NAGRIK; KATHERINE McCOLL; TONY 

FIGUEROA; PARK PLACE PROPERTY; 

NEW PHASE GROUP, LLC; MTC 

FINANCIAL INC. dba TRUSTEE CORPS; 

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; 

FEDERAL LOAN MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION; HOMESTEPS; and DOES 

1 – 10, inclusive 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:10-cv-00338-GEB-DAD 

STIPULATION TO ORDER ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

WHEREAS: 

1. A motion to dismiss filed by defendants FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION, HOMESTEPS, and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION 

SYSTEMS, INC. (“MERS”) is presently set for hearing on June 21, 2010, and 

Case 2:10-cv-00338-GEB-DAD Document 18 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation and Order on Motion to Dismiss 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Plaintiff concedes the motion is meritorious as to the First Cause of Action; resists 

dismissal of MERS from the Second Cause of Action with prejudice, and opposes the motion as 

directed to the Third Cause of Action in part because plaintiff states an ability to replead that 

cause of action; and 

3. Plaintiff seeks leave to file an amended complaint addressing all presently 

pleaded causes of action; and 

4. The moving defendants and plaintiff wish to provide for the efficient and 

expeditious advancement of this matter. 

NOW THEREFORE IT IS STIPULATED by the moving parties and plaintiff, by their 

counsel, subject to this Court’s approval, that the motion of dismissal is granted, without 

prejudice. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. 

Dated: June 15, 2010 

 _________S/_____________________ 

 Charles D. Chalmers 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: June 15, 2010 

 __________S/____________________ 

 Anthony C. Haynes 

 MALCOLM CISNEROS 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: 6/16/10 

Case 2:10-cv-00338-GEB-DAD Document 18 Filed 06/17/10 Page 2 of 2