Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-00017/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-00017-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

06cv17 BTM (WMc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANTIC ASHANTI’S CAUSE, et al.,

Plaintiff,

v.

GARY M. SAUTER, et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06cv17 BTM (WMc)

ORDER FOLLOWING EARLY

NEUTRAL EVALUATION

CONFERENCE, SETTING RULE 26

COMPLIANCE AND NOTICE OF

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

On November 13, 2007, the Court convened a telephonic Status Conference in the above

entitled action. Appearing for Plaintiff was David Wakefield. Appearing for Defendant was

David Peters.

The Court discussed compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and based thereon, issues the

following orders:

1. The Rule 26(f) conference shall be completed before December 5, 2007;

2. A discovery plan shall be lodged with Magistrate Judge McCurine, Jr. on or

before December 17, 2007. Regarding each witness, the discovery plan will

include the name, most current address, most current phone number, and a brief

description of the subject matter of his/her testimony. The discovery plan will

also include the anticipated dates for the completion of both non-expert discovery

and expert discovery; and,

Case 3:06-cv-00017-BTM-WMC Document 19 Filed 11/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 06cv17 BTM (WMc)

3. The date of initial disclosure pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) shall occur before

December 21, 2007;

4. Counsel and parties with full settlement authority are ordered to appear on

January 4, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. in the chambers of United States Magistrate Judge

William McCurine, Jr., 940 Front Street, Courtroom C, San Diego, California,

92101, for a Case Management Conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 16(b). Full authority to settle means that the individual present at

the settlement conference has the unfettered discretion and authority to: 1)

fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement

options; 2) agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the

parties; 3) change the settlement position of a party; and 4) negotiate

monetary awards without being restricted to a specific sum certain.

Failure of any counsel or party to comply with this Order will result in the imposition of

sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 14, 2007

Hon. William McCurine, Jr.

U.S. Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court

COPY TO:

HONORABLE BARRY T. MOSKOWITZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case 3:06-cv-00017-BTM-WMC Document 19 Filed 11/14/07 Page 2 of 2