Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-02350/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-02350-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Herve Holemen, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles Ryan, 

 Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV12-02350-PHX-SRB

ORDER

Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

on November 1, 2012 raising two grounds for relief: 1) ineffective assistance of counsel at

trial violating Petitioner's Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights; and 2) ineffective

assistance of counsel on appeal and in state post-conviction proceedings. On March 18, 2013

Respondent filed his Response to Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus . Petitioner

filed a reply on April 16, 2013. On June 19, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and

Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Case 2:12-cv-02350-SRB Document 13 Filed 07/15/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied

and dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability and leave to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a

plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 15th day of July, 2013.

Case 2:12-cv-02350-SRB Document 13 Filed 07/15/13 Page 2 of 2