Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01129/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01129-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\L\07cv1129-Dismiss2.wpd, 7107 -1- 07cv1129

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOMCHIT J. NASIRICHAMPANG, Civil No. 07cv1129-L (AJB)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING IN FORMA

PAUPERIS APPLICATION AND

DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

v.

VICTOR M. ALMAGER, Warden,

Respondent.

On June 21, 2007, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ

of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma

pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). On June 26, 2007, the Court denied the request to

proceed in forma pauperis because Petitioner had not provided the Court with sufficient information to determine Petitioner’s financial status. The denial was without prejudice to Petitioner to

either paying the filing fee or submitting an application to proceed in forma pauperis which

included a certificate from the warden or other appropriate officer showing the amount of money

or securities Petitioner has on account in the institution. See Rule 3(a)(2), 28 U.S.C. foll.

§ 2254; Local Rule 3.2. 

Petitioner has now filed a second Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. No. 5.)

However, Petitioner has once again failed to provide the Court with the required Prison

Certificate. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the request to proceed in forma pauperis, and

Case 3:07-cv-01129-L-AJB Document 6 Filed 07/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K:\COMMON\EVERYONE\_EFILE-PROSE\L\07cv1129-Dismiss2.wpd, 7107 -2- 07cv1129

DISMISSES the case without prejudice. To have the case reopened, Petitioner must, no later

than September 10, 2007, provide the Court with: (1) a copy of this Order together with the

$5.00 filing fee; or (2) a copy of this Order together with adequate proof that Petitioner cannot

pay the $5.00 filing fee.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 10, 2007

M. James Lorenz

United States District Court Judge

CC: ALL PARTIES

Case 3:07-cv-01129-L-AJB Document 6 Filed 07/10/07 Page 2 of 2