Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00923/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00923-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HA’SHONEE SOLOMON, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

MATHEW C. KRAMER, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:05-cv-00923-REC-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

(Doc. 9)

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 8)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Petitioner filed the instant petition on June 27, 2005. (Doc. 1). On July 27, 2005, Petitioner

filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss his petition. (Doc. 8). On August 2, 2005, the Magistrate Judge

issued a Report and Recommendation that Petitioner’s motion be GRANTED. (Doc. 9). This Report

and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the

Report and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty days of the date of service of the order. 

Over thirty days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Report

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation issued August 9, 2005 (Doc. 9), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. Petitioner’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 8), is GRANTED; 

Case 1:05-cv-00923-REC-TAG Document 10 Filed 09/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 13, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00923-REC-TAG Document 10 Filed 09/14/05 Page 2 of 2