Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01953/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01953-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

32

1

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ASSOCIATED DEADLINES ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Martinez v. County of Sonoma; United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 3:15-cv-01953-JST 

Mark E. Merin (State Bar No. 043849) 

Paul H. Masuhara (State Bar No. 289805) 

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN

1010 F Street, Suite 300 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 443-6911 

Facsimile: (916) 447-8336 

E-Mail: mark@markmerin.com 

 paul@markmerin.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Bonnie A. Freeman, Esq. (SB 180502) 

SENNEFF FREEMAN & BLUESTONE, LLP 

50 Old Courthouse Square, Suite 401 

P.O. Box 3729 

Santa Rosa, CA 95402-3729 

Telephone: 707-526-4250 

Facsimile: 707-526-0347 

bfreeman@sennefflaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MYRAH MARTINEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-cv-01953-JST

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ASSOCIATED 

DEADLINES ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO 

STRIKE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

 

 WHEREAS, plaintiffs have filed an amended notice on plaintiffs’ motion to strike affirmative 

defenses from defendants’ joint answer which is currently scheduled for a hearing based upon the before 

the Court on March 31, 2016. See ECF No. 62. 

 WHEREAS, defendants’ counsel Bonnie Freeman is currently on vacation and is unavailable to 

meet the associated deadline to respond to said motion on February 23, 2016; 

 WHEREAS, the parties, through their representatives, have agreed to stipulate to continue the 

opposition and reply dates for said motion from the new hearing date based upon Ms. Freeman’s 

unavailability the parties hereby STIPULATE to the following: 

Case 3:15-cv-01953-JST Document 65 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1. the Court's rescheduling of the associated deadline for defendants to respond to said 

motion to be continued to March 8, 2016; and 

2. the Court's rescheduling of the associated deadline for plaintiffs to reply to said motion to 

be continued to March 15, 2016. 

Dated: February 17, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, 

Dated: February 17, 2016 

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 

BY:l~ Ma-;k E. Merin 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

MYRAH MARTINEZ, KlTARA MCCRAY, 

MADISON MARLENE MARVEL, STAR SMITH, 

andR.M. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

SENNEFF FREEMAN & BLUESTONE, LLP 

/S/ Bonnie A. Freeman 

By: --------------------------------

Bonnie A. Freeman 

Attorneys for Defendants County of Sonoma (also sued as 

Sonoma County Human Services Department and Sonoma 

County Family, Youth and Children's Services), Jerry 

Dunn, Nick Honey and Stacie Kabour 

2 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ASSOCIATED DEADLINES ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Martinez v. County o/Sonoma; United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 3:l5-cv-OI953-JST 

Case 3:15-cv-01953-JST Document 65 Filed 02/17/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

32

3

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ASSOCIATED DEADLINES ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Martinez v. County of Sonoma; United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 3:15-cv-01953-JST 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and finding good cause, the Court hereby ORDERS the 

following: 

1. the associated deadline for defendants to respond to said motion is continued to March 8, 

2016; and 

2. the associated deadline for plaintiffs to reply to said motion is continued to March 15, 

2016.

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 17, 2016

_________________________________________ 

JON S. TIGAR, DISTRICT JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:15-cv-01953-JST Document 65 Filed 02/17/16 Page 3 of 3