Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00274/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00274-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD VICTOR SEVILLA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

TERHUNE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-00274-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 13)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Ronald Victor Sevilla (“plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On April 10, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation that recommended this action be dismissed as

duplicative. The Findings and Recommendation was served on

Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On May 1, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

Case 1:06-cv-00274-AWI-DLB Document 18 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Plaintiff’s

objections do not provide a basis to not dismiss this action.

While the objections address Plaintiff’s underlying claims, the

objections fail to address the fact that this action is

duplicative of an earlier filed action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed April 10, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED as DUPLICATIVE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00274-AWI-DLB Document 18 Filed 06/27/06 Page 2 of 2