Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01939/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01939-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

58947259.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS FAC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Maurice J. Curtis,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Coca-Cola Enterprises Bottling Companies, 

dba. Coca Cola Bottling Company of Los 

Angeles; and DOES One through Twenty, 

inclusive

Defendant.

CASE NO. 1:13-CV-01939 AWI (BAM)

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AND TO VACATE 

AUGUST 4, 2014 HEARING DATE

Case 1:13-cv-01939-AWI-BAM Document 19 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 2
58947259.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS FAC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended 

Complaint and Vacate August 4, 2014 Hearing Date, filed jointly by Plaintiff Maurice J. Curtis 

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, erroneously named 

as “Coca-Cola Enterprises Bottling Companies, dba. Coca Cola Bottling Company of Los 

Angeles” (“Defendant” or “BCI”) (collectively, the “Parties”), and good cause appearing, the 

Court hereby GRANTS the Stipulation as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (the “Motion 

to Dismiss”) is hereby deemed withdrawn without prejudice; and

2. The August 4, 2014 hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss is hereby vacated; and 

3. By virtue of entering into this Stipulation, the Parties do not waive and expressly 

reserve all claims, rights and defenses in this action with respect to Plaintiff’s 

Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 24, 2014 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01939-AWI-BAM Document 19 Filed 07/24/14 Page 2 of 2