Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-218/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER 

SEAL

No. 07-5944-SC; MDL No. 1917

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION,

This Document Relates to:

Sharp Electronics Corp, et al. v. Hitachi, 

Ltd., et al., No. 13-cv-001173

No. 07-cv-5944-SC

MDL No. 1917

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL

Upon consideration of Thomson SA’s Administrative Motion to Seal portions of its 

Motion to Dismiss Newly Filed Direct Action Plaintiffs’ Complaints, the Declaration of Jeffrey S. 

Roberts in support thereof, and the Court’s Order Granting Administrative Motion to Seal 

Portions of Certain DAPs’ Amended Complaints [Dkt. No. 2310], and good cause appearing 

therefore:

The Court hereby GRANTS Thomson SA’s motion to seal and orders that the portions of 

Thomson SA’s Motion to Dismiss Newly Filed Direct Action Plaintiffs’ Complaints that 

reference previously sealed portions of ¶ 138 of Office Depot’s First Amended Complaint are 

properly sealable and shall be sealed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Hon. Samuel Conti

United States District Judge

2/12/2014

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2384 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 1