Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-04191/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-04191-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

38072585.1

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

NOS. 17-CV-04006, 17-CV-04191, 17-CV-04192

KELLY M. KLAUS (SBN 161091)

kelly.klaus@mto.com

ROHIT K. SINGLA (SBN 213057)

rohit.singla@mto.com

ELIA HERRERA (SBN 293278)

elia.herrera@mto.com

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

560 Mission Street, 27th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105-2907

Telephone: (415) 512-4000

Facsimile: (415) 512-4077

STEVE W. BERMAN (pro hac vice)

steve@hbsslaw.com

MARK S. CARLSON (pro hac vice)

markc@hbsslaw.com

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300

Seattle, Washington 98101

Telephone: (206) 623-7292

Facsimile: (206) 623-0594

GLENN D. POMERANTZ (SBN 112503)

glenn.pomerantz@mto.com

JOHN L. SCHWAB (SBN 301386)

john.schwab@mto.com

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

350 South Grand Avenue, 50th Floor

Los Angeles, California 90071-3426

Telephone: (213) 683-9100

Facsimile: (213) 687-3702

Attorneys for Defendants

RIO S. PIERCE (SBN 298297)

riop@hbsslaw.com

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202

Berkeley, California 94710

Telephone: (510) 725-3000

Facsimile: (510) 725-3001

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

REARDEN LLC and REARDEN MOVA 

LLC,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, WALT 

DISNEY MOTION PICTURES GROUP, 

INC., BUENA VISTA HOME 

ENTERTAINMENT, INC., MARVEL 

STUDIOS, LLC, and MANDEVILLE 

FILMS, INC.,

Defendants.

Case Nos. 3:17-cv-04006-JST

3:17-cv-04191-JST

3:17-cv-04192-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

PLAINTIFFS’ FILING OF FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINTS AND 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS 

TO DISMISS THE SAME

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Case 3:17-cv-04191-JST Document 42 Filed 03/07/18 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

38072585.1

 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

NOS. 17-CV-04006, 17-CV-04191, 17-CV-04192

REARDEN LLC and REARDEN MOVA 

LLC,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM 

CORPORATION and TWENTIETH 

CENTURY FOX HOME 

ENTERTAINMENT LLC,

Defendants.

REARDEN LLC and REARDEN MOVA 

LLC,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

PARAMOUNT PICTURES 

CORPORATION and PARAMOUNT 

HOME ENTERTAINMENT 

DISTRIBUTION INC.

Defendants.

Case 3:17-cv-04191-JST Document 42 Filed 03/07/18 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

38072585.1

 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

NOS. 17-CV-04006, 17-CV-04191, 17-CV-04192 conCO

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs and Defendants in the above-captioned action, by and through their counsel of 

record, stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on February 22, the Court granted Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ 

original complaints in theabove-captioned cases in part, and dismissed certain claims without 

prejudice (No. 17-cv-04006, Dkt. 60);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have provided Defendants with proposed amended complaints after 

the Court’s decision;

WHEREAS, Defendants do not object to the filing of the amended complaints, based on 

Plaintiffs’ agreement and the Court’s approval of a stipulated schedule on motions to dismiss the 

amended complaints that Defendants intend to file;

NOW THEREFORE, for good cause, the parties stipulate as follows:

[1] Defendants do not oppose Plaintiffs’ filing of the proposed First Amended 

Complaints in the above-captioned cases. The Parties agree that by entering this Stipulation,

Defendants do not waive any objections to the amendments that may be asserted in motions to 

dismiss or other appropriate motions.

[2] The Defendants in each case shall have 30 days from the date Plaintiffs file each 

First Amended Complaint to file motions to dismiss them.

[3] Plaintiffs shall have 21 days from the date each such motion to dismiss is filed to 

file their opposition.

[4] Defendants in each case shall have 21 days from the date the opposition brief is 

filed to file their reply.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 3:17-cv-04191-JST Document 42 Filed 03/07/18 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

38072585.1

 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

NOS. 17-CV-04006, 17-CV-04191, 17-CV-04192 conCO

DATED: March 6, 2018 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

By: /s/ Steve Berman

STEVE BERMAN

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED: March 6, 2018 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

By: /s/ Kelly M Klaus

KELLY M. KLAUS

Attorneys for Defendants 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION

I, Steve Berman, am the ECF user whose credentials were utilized in the electronic filing 

of this document. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Kelly M. 

Klaus concurred in the filing of this document.

 /s/ Steve Berman 

Steve Berman

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _______________, 2018

The Honorable Jon S. Tigar

March 7

Case 3:17-cv-04191-JST Document 42 Filed 03/07/18 Page 4 of 4