Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01268/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01268-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

EDWARD R. REINES (Bar No. 135960)

PAUL T. EHRLICH (Bar No. 228543)

BRANDON CONARD (Bar. No. 234824)

WElL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

Silicon Valley Office

201 Redwood Shores Parkway

Redwood Shores, CA 94065

Telephone: (650) 802-3000

Facsimile: (650) 802-3100

Of Counsel:

SCOTT HOVER-SMOOT (Bar No. 111627)

TSMC NORTH AMERICA

2685 Junction A venue

San Jose, CA 95134

Telephone: (408) 382-7971

Facsimile: (408) 382-8166

Attorneys for Defendants

T AIW AN SEMICONDUCTOR

MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD. , and

TSMC NORTH AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO

UniRAM TECHNOLOGY, INc., a California

corporation

Plaintiff

MONOLITHIC SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, a

Delaware corporation; T AIW AN

SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING

COMPANY LTD. , a Taiwan corporation, and

TSMC NORTH AMERICA, a California

corporation

Defendants.

Case No. CV 04-01268-VRW

STIPULA TION AND (PROPOSED)

ORDER RE: FINAL CONTENTIONS

AND REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORTS

STIPULATION RE: FINAL CONTENTIONS

AND REBUTTAL REPORTS

Case No. CV-O4-01268 VRW

SYJ :\247576\O2\SbI402!.DOC\76835.0003

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 189 Filed 06/22/06 Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS , the parties agreed in their Joint Case Management Statement to tie

the deadlines for filing Final Infringement Contentions and Final Invalidity Contentions to the

completion of Rule 30(b)(6) depositions concerning the accused products

WHEREAS , the parties desire to consolidate the deadlines for filing Final

Invalidity Contentions under Patent Local Rules 3-6(b)(l) and (2),

WHEREAS , the parties desire to amend the Case Management Order to

incorporate additional time for rebuttal expert reports based on the complex subject matter in this

case

In view of the foregoing, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

The date for UniRAM to submit Final Infringement Contentions under Patent Local Rule

6(a) is extended to fifteen days after completion of UniRAM' s depositions of TSMC

and MoSys pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) on the subject of the accused products.

The dates for TSMC and MoSys to submit Final Invalidity Contentions under Patent

Local Rules 3-6(b)(l) and (2) are consolidated and extended to twenty days after either

the day UniRAM submits its Final Infringement Contentions or the last day the parties

agree UniRAM is allowed to submit its Final Infringement Contentions , whichever is

earlier.

The date for the parties to serve rebuttal expert reports is extended to and includes October

, 2006.

The date by which discovery from experts must be concluded is extended to and includes

November 17, 2006.

STIPULATION RE: FINAL CONTENTIONS

AND REBUTTAL REPORTS

Case NoCV 04-01268 VRW

SYJ :\247576\O2\SbI402!.DOC\76835. 0003.

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 189 Filed 06/22/06 Page 2 of 3
Dated: May 26, 2006

Dated: May 26, 2006

Dated: May 26, 2006

By: Isl

Edward R. Reines

Attorneys for Defendants

Taiwan Semiconductor

Manufacturing Company, Ltd, and

TSMC North America

By: Isl

Mark Scarsi

Attorneys for Defendant

Monolithic System Technology

By: Isl

Joseph Grinstein

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UniRAM Technology Inc.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May -, 2006 By:

Honorable Vaughn R. Walker

STIPULATION RE: FINAL CONTENTIONS

AND REBUTTAL REPORTS

Case NoCV 04-01268 VRW

SV I :\247576\02\5bJ402!.DOC\76835.0003.

June 22, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 189 Filed 06/22/06 Page 3 of 3