Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-02420/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-02420-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

Case No. 13-CV-02420-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING RENEWED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.,

TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., 

INC., AND TAKEDA 

PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

 v. 

TWI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 13-CV-02420-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING RENEWED 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO 

SEAL 

Before the Court are the parties’ renewed administrative sealing motions (ECF Nos. 181, 

182, 183), which were filed in connection with TWi’s summary judgment motion. According to 

the standards set forth in Kamakana v City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 

2006), In re Electronic Arts, Inc., 298 F. App’x 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008), and Apple, Inc. v. 

Samsung Electronics. Co., 727 F.3d 1214, 1228-29 (Fed. Cir. 2013), the Court reviews the parties’ 

sealing motions under the “compelling reasons” standard. 

With this standard in mind, the Court rules as follows: 

 

Case 5:13-cv-02420-LHK Document 190 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

Case No. 13-CV-02420-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING RENEWED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

Motion to Seal ECF No. Document to be Sealed Ruling 

181 181-3 TWi’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions. 

181 181-5 Mizerk Decl. Ex HH: Deposition 

of Dr. William N. Charman

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions. 

181 181-7 Mizerk Decl. Ex NN: Expert 

Report of Dr. William N. 

Charman on Infringement

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions. 

181 181-9 Mizerk Decl. Ex ZZ: Rebuttal 

Expert Report of Dr. Edmund J. 

Elder, Jr., on Non-Infringement

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions. 

182 182-3 Reply in Support of TWi’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions. 

183 183-3 Takeda’s Opposition to TWi’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment 

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions. 

183 183-5 Takahashi Decl. Ex. 3: Expert 

Report of Dr. Brian Fennerty

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions. 

183 183-8 Takahashi Decl. Ex. 49: Expert 

Report of Dr. William N. 

Charman

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions. 

183 183-11 Takahashi Decl. Ex. 50: Reply 

Expert Report of Dr. William N. 

Charman

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions. 

183 183-14 Takahashi Decl. Ex. 54: 

Declaration of Dr. William N. 

Charman

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions. 

The Court also GRANTS Takeda’s motion to file a corrected public redacted version of its 

Opposition to TWi’s Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 184. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 5, 2015 _________________________________ 

 LUCY H. KOH 

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:13-cv-02420-LHK Document 190 Filed 05/05/15 Page 2 of 2