Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00021/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00021-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2729

Attorneys for Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANDIP KAUR,

Plaintiff,

v.

Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland

Security, et al.

 Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 08-CV-F-21 LJO GSA

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:

EXTENSION OF TIME

This is an immigration case in which plaintiff has challenged the delay in the adjudication of

his application to adjust status by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS). Defendants

respectfully inform the Court that the government is endeavoring to complete adjudication of the

application, and that it is expected that this adjudication will be complete shortly. Accordingly,

the government respectfully requests a 60-day extension of time for the filing of the

government’s answer to the complaint. Plaintiff’s counsel does not oppose this first request for

an extension of time.

The government therefore requests that the time for filing the government’s answer be

extended to May 7, 2008, and that the scheduling conference, currently set for April 3, 2008, be

reset to sometime after the new answer due date.

 

Case 1:08-cv-00021-LJO-GSA Document 14 Filed 03/12/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

Dated: March 7, 2008

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/Audrey Hemesath

Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

/s/ James Makasian

James Makasian

Attorney for the Plaintiff 

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the defendants’ Answer is due on May 7, 2008, and that the scheduling

conference is reset to June 4, 2008 at 8:15am Joint Scheduling Report due 5/28/08. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 12, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00021-LJO-GSA Document 14 Filed 03/12/08 Page 2 of 2