Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01761/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01761-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 This action, originally and erroneously filed as a habeas application, was dismissed with 1

leave granted petitioner, as plaintiff, to file a civil rights action which, despite generous

extensions of time, petitioner/plaintiff failed to do.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE HAMILTON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1761 DFL GGH P

vs.

J. S. WOODFORD, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

On August 23, 2006, petitioner/plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the 1

magistrate judge’s order filed August 14, 2006, denying petitioner/plaintiff’s request to vacate

the June 21, 2006, findings and recommendations and denying his request for an extension of

time to file objections to those findings and recommendations. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-

303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 

Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s

ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01761-DFL-GGH Document 39 Filed 12/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed August 14, 2006, is affirmed, the findings and recommendations filed June

21, 2006, are adopted, and this action is dismissed.

DATED: December 12, 2006

/s/ David F. Levi 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/hami1761.850

Case 2:05-cv-01761-DFL-GGH Document 39 Filed 12/12/06 Page 2 of 2