Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00805/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00805-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT TUNSTALL,

Plaintiff, CV F 05 0805 OWW WMW P 

vs. FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION 

 RE MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE 

 RELIEF (DOC 13)

K. MENDOZA-POWERS, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for injunctive relief, requesting an order directing

prison officials at the California Medical Facility at Vacaville to provide Plaintiff access to

the law library, and his legal materials. Plaintiff is currently housed in Administrative

Segregation at CMF Vacaville.

This action proceeds against defendant correctional officials at CSP

Corcoran for conduct that occurred while Plaintiff was housed at CSP Corcoran. The court

must have personal jurisdiction over the parties to be enjoined; it may not enjoin defendants not

yet served or before the court. Zepeda v. United States I.N.S., 753 F.2d 719, 727 (9 Cir. 1983). th

The Court does not have jurisdiction over any of the individuals against whom which Plaintiff

seeks injunctive relief.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s motion for

Case 1:05-cv-00805-OWW -WMW Document 15 Filed 08/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

injunctive relief be denied.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9 Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the th

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 2, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00805-OWW -WMW Document 15 Filed 08/03/07 Page 2 of 2