Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-06185/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-06185-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REMOVE

FILED DOCUMENTS FROM CASE FILE AND DOCKET CASE NO.

4:18-CV-06185-HSG

Michael Liu Su (SBN 300590) 

michael.liu.su@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice) 

lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com 

Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice) 

bradford.schulz@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

Two Freedom Square 

11955 Freedom Drive 

Reston, VA 20190 

Telephone: (571) 203-2700 

Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ZTE (USA) Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

ZTE (USA) INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC, 

Defendants. 

 CASE NO. 4:18-cv-06185-HSG 

(Former Case No. 2:17-cv-00517-JRG) 

(E.D. Tex.) 

ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

REMOVE FILED DOCUMENTS 

FROM CASE FILE AND DOCKET 

 

 

 

Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 54 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REMOVE FILED 

DOCUMENTS FROM CASE FILE AND DOCKET CASE NO. 4:18-CV-06185-

HSG

ORDER

The Court has reviewed ZTE (USA) Inc.’s Administrative Motion to Remove Filed 

Documents from Case File and Docket and the Declaration of Bradford C. Schulz in Support of 

Administrative Motion to Remove Filed Documents from Case File and Docket. For good cause 

appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dkt. Nos. 42-4, 42-6, 42-7, 42-8, 42-9, 42-10, 42-11, 42-12, 42-13, and 42-14; the originally 

filed highlighted ZTE’s Response to Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (“Response”) 

(Dkt. Nos. 42-3, 43), the originally filed highlighted Declaration of Bradford C. Schulz in Support of 

the Response (Dkt. Nos. 42-5, 43-1), and the originally filed Exhibits 3 (Dkt. No. 43-4), 4 (Dkt. No. 

43-5), 5 (Dkt. No. 43-6), 6 (Dkt. No. 43-7), 8 (Dkt. No. 43-9), 10 (Dkt. No. 43-11), 14 (Dkt. No. 43-

15), and 34 (Dkt. No. 43-35) be permanently removed from the case file and docket. 

Dated: April 3, 2019 _________________________________ 

 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 54 Filed 04/03/19 Page 2 of 2