Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-1_15-cv-02995/USCOURTS-cand-1_15-cv-02995-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint case

management statement filed in connection with a case management conference. Because the instant

action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case management conference has not

been scheduled.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASHELLA BENJAMIN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant. /

No. C 15-02995 JSW

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

INFORM COURT WHETHER SHE

CONSENTS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FOR ALL PURPOSES

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to

reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. 

See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). Defendant has filed consent. Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to advise the

Court, no later than July 27, 2015, as to whether she consents to have a magistrate judge conduct all

further proceedings in the instant action.1

 For the parties’ convenience, consent forms are available

at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section. The parties are further advised that they

may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 16, 2015 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-02995-NJV Document 11 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:15-cv-02995-NJV Document 11 Filed 07/16/15 Page 2 of 2