Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01391/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01391-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1391

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR 

CARRINGTON MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2005-OPT2, ASSET 

BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-OPT 2,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

IVY K. INOCENCIO; MARISSA P. GOMEZ; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior

District Judge. (1:15-cv-00015-TSE-MSN)

Submitted: December 29, 2015 Decided: January 7, 2016

Before GREGORY and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

S. Mohsin Reza, Mary C. Zinsner, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Tysons 

Corner, Virginia, for Appellant. Carolina D. Ciraolo, Acting 

Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Clark, Regina S. Mariarty, 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1391 Doc: 22 Filed: 01/07/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. brought suit in Virginia 

state court seeking rescission of a foreclosure sale that took 

place approximately four years earlier. The United States 

removed the action to district court and moved to dismiss

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6). The district court 

granted the motion to dismiss as to the United States, based on 

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because there were no 

viable remaining claims as against the remaining defendants, the 

court also dismissed the action in its entirety. We have 

reviewed the parties’ briefs, as well as the record on appeal,

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED 

Appeal: 15-1391 Doc: 22 Filed: 01/07/2016 Pg: 2 of 2