Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05790/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05790-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

JT. STIP RE PLTFS’ EMERGENCY RULE 

56(E) MTN

FIRMWIDE:146262793.2 064752.1003

1 CASE NO. 3:12-CV-05790-JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Timothy J. Becker (MN Bar No. 256663)

tbecker@johnsonbecker.com

Jacob R. Rusch (MN Bar No. 391892)

jrusch@johnsonbecker.com

JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC

33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4530

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

Telephone: (612) 436-1800 

Fax: (612) 436-1801

Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs

Robert G. Hulteng, Bar No. 071293

rhulteng@littler.com

Aurelio J. Pérez, Bar No. 282135

aperez@littler.com

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

333 Bush, 34th Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 433-1940

Fax: (415) 399-8490

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PHILLIP FLORES and DARAH DOUNG,

individually and on behalf of all similarly

situated individuals,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC, a 

wholly-owned subsidiary of Dynamex 

Operations East, LLC1, TRANSFORCE, INC., 

and DYNAMEX OPERATIONS EAST, LLC, 

Defendants,

Case No. 3:12-cv-05790-JST

Assigned for all purposes to the Honorable Jon 

S. Tigar

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING 

PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY MOTION

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P 56(E) 

[DKT 247]

Complaint Filed: November 9, 2012

FAC Filed: January 8, 2013

SAC Filed: July 17, 2013

TAC Filed: March 28, 2013

4

th AC Filed: June 26, 2014

 

1

Formerly Dynamex Operations East, Inc.

Case 3:12-cv-05790-JST Document 252 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 3
JT. STIP RE PLTFS’ EMERGENCY RULE 

56(E) MTN

FIRMWIDE:146262793.2 064752.1003

2 CASE NO. 3:12-CV-05790-JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Following the telephonic Case Management Conference held on March 8, 2017, the Parties 

further discussed the evidentiary issues raised in Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Partial Summary Judgment as to Misclassification and Willfulness that were raised during the case 

management conference. See generally Dkt. Nos. 241-250. In order to streamline the remaining 

evidentiary disputes, the Parties stipulate as follows:

1. Exhibits 1 and 4 (the archived websites) to the Declaration of Timothy J. Becker 

(“Becker Dec.”) are not properly authenticated;

2. The deposition excerpts attached to the Becker Dec. are authentic copies of the 

transcripts created and produced in this case;

3. The deposition exhibits attached to the Becker Dec. are true and correct copies of 

the documents submitted during the depositions cited in the Becker Dec.; and

4. Defendants retain all other evidentiary objections raised in its opposition to the 

deposition transcripts and deposition exhibits including remaining disputes regarding 

foundation.

5. The parties further agree that, upon entry of order, no further action—including any 

further briefing by either party or hearing—is needed with regard to Plaintiffs’ 

emergency motion [Dkt No. 248].

SO STIPULATED.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:12-cv-05790-JST Document 252 Filed 03/09/17 Page 2 of 3
JT. STIP RE PLTFS’ EMERGENCY RULE 

56(E) MTN

FIRMWIDE:146262793.2 064752.1003

3 CASE NO. 3:12-CV-05790-JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Dated: March 8, 2017 /s/ Jacob R. Rusch

Timothy J. Becker

Jacob R. Rusch

JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC

Trial Counsel for Plaintiffs

Dated: March 8, 2017 /s/ Aurelio J. Perez

Robert G. Hulteng

Aurelio J. Perez

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, this ___ of March 2017.

HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR

9

Case 3:12-cv-05790-JST Document 252 Filed 03/09/17 Page 3 of 3