Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02753/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02753-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVE WHITE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

EMIL VILLA’S CALIFORNIA BBQ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-05-2753 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING EMIL VILLA’S

CALIFORNIA BBQ, MIN SOO CHANG,

AND CHIN HUI CHANG TO LODGE

CHAMBERS COPIES IN COMPLIANCE

WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On September 7, 2005, defendants Emil Villa’s California BBQ, Min Soo Chang, and

Chin Hui Chang dba Emil Villa’s California BBQ electronically filed an answer. On

September 13, 2005, said defendants electronically filed an amended answer. Said

defendants have violated General Order 45 and the Court’s standing orders, however, by

failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the

day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name,

case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also

Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Accordingly, Emil Villa’s California BBQ, Min Soo Chang, and Chin Hui Chang dba

Emil Villa’s California BBQ are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the

Court’s standing orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of the aboveCase 3:05-cv-02753-MMC Document 17 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

referenced documents. The parties are hereby advised that if either party fails in the future

to comply with the Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed

documents, the Court may impose sanctions on the noncomplying party, including, but not

limited to, striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers

copy has not been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 19, 2005 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-02753-MMC Document 17 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 2