Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-06360/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-06360-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JUANA MAMISAY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., 

Defendants. 

JAMIE TROUT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., 

 Defendants. 

KATHERINE KING, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., 

 Defendants. 

SALESHNI CHAND, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-05684-YGR 

Case No. 16-cv-05698-YGR 

Case No. 16-cv-05711-YGR 

Case No. 16-cv-06311-YGR 

 

Case 4:16-cv-06360-YGR Document 19 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 4
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

TO ALL PARTIES IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASES AND THE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

To manage efficiently the various similar issues raised in the captioned cases, the Court 

issues this case management order. All local and federal rules shall be followed except as 

otherwise set forth herein. 

Defendants in the above-captioned cases shall file a responsive pleading, including any 

motions to dismiss by no later than December 27, 2016. In their motions, defendants shall not 

raise the same arguments already advanced by Experian and Chase in their previously-field 

motions to dismiss in cases 16-5684, 16-5698, and 16-5711. Defendants may adopt those 

arguments by referencing the previously-filed motion(s) and attaching the motion(s). 

Plaintiffs’ oppositions to the motions to dismiss are due on January 17, 2017. In their 

oppositions, plaintiffs shall not raise the same arguments already advanced in the earliest-filed 

GLENNDA GATCHALIAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EQUIFAX, INC., ET AL., Defendants. 

JUSTIN PETRIE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., Defendants. 

KRISTIN ETHRIDGE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., Defendants. 

 

Case No. 16-cv-06334-YGR 

 Case No. 16-cv-06348-YGR 

Case No. 16-cv-06360-YGR 

 ORDER 

Case 4:16-cv-06360-YGR Document 19 Filed 12/15/16 Page 2 of 4
3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

opposition. Plaintiffs may adopt those arguments by referencing the earliest-filed opposition(s) 

and attaching the opposition(s). 

Defendants shall file one consolidated reply in each case by February 7, 2017. Defendant 

Experian shall indicate in each reply whether new arguments are being raised, or whether the reply 

is adopting the same arguments as the earliest-filed reply. 

No chamber copies shall be sent except, within two business days of the last filing, 

Defendants shall deliver one comprehensive binder including all of the various filings. The Court 

does not require multiple copies of the identical attachments (see lines 2:26 and 3:2). Rather, the 

binder may include the first page of the attachment only. In addition, it shall include an index 

which separates the actions from the motion work, e.g. Tab 1 shall be for case no. 16-cv-5684, 

with subtabs, A, B, and C for the motion, opposition and reply. All chambers copies shall have 

ECF headers. 

A hearing shall be held on all motions to dismiss on February 28, 2017 on the Court’s 

1:00 p.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in 

Courtroom 1. 

The Court further understands, based upon the representations of the parties at the case 

management conference on December 12, 2016, that defendants Citibank, Bank of America, and 

Transunion are in the process of finalizing settlement agreements with plaintiffs. By January 6, 

2017, the parties shall file either (a) a Stipulation of Dismissal; or (b) a one-page JOINT 

STATEMENT setting forth an explanation regarding the failure to comply. A compliance hearing 

shall be held on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar on Friday, January 13, 2017, in Courtroom 1 of 

the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland, California. If compliance is 

complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. 

Plaintiffs shall also serve all defendants in the above-captioned cases no later than 

January 6, 2017. A compliance hearing shall be held on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar on 

Friday, January 13, 2017, in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay 

Street in Oakland, California. By January 6, 2017, plaintiffs shall file a one-page STATEMENT

confirming that all remaining defendants have been served or setting forth an explanation 

Case 4:16-cv-06360-YGR Document 19 Filed 12/15/16 Page 3 of 4
4 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

regarding the failure to comply. If compliance is complete, plaintiffs need not appear and the 

compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. 

All currently pending motions and stipulations for extensions of time in the abovecaptioned cases are DENIED AS MOOT. All currently pending motions and stipulations for 

dismissal are GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 15, 2016 

______________________________________ 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:16-cv-06360-YGR Document 19 Filed 12/15/16 Page 4 of 4