Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05783/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05783-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Second Stipulation by the Parties to Extend the Dispositive Motions’ Deadline; Order

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

JAMES E. FLYNN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

MARIA G. CHAN, State Bar No. 192130

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 323-1940

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Alameida, and Tristan

SF2003200498

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS GAETANO LUPARELLO,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.,

Defendants.

NO. CIV F 02-5783 AWI SMS P

SECOND STIPULATION BY THE

PARTIES TO EXTEND THE

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS’

DEADLINE; ORDER

On September 14, 2005, the parties entered into a stipulation to extend the dispositive

motions’ deadline from September 18, 2005 to October 18, 2005. The parties entered into the

stipulation based on the fact that they were engaged in settlement negotiations. On September

15, 2005, the Court issued an order extending the dispositive motions’ deadline to October 18,

2005, in light of the stipulation. 

The parties hereby stipulate to extend the dispositive motions’ deadline an additional

thirty days. The parties are engaged in settlement negotiations, however, those negotiations have

not been concluded. The parties intend to continue with the settlement negotiations. If

Case 1:02-cv-05783-AWI -SMS Document 87 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Second Stipulation by the Parties to Extend the Dispositive Motions’ Deadline; Order

2

settlement negotiations are fruitful, concluding the case prior to the filing of dispositive motions

will reduce the economic burden on the parties and the Court. 

For these reasons, the parties wish to extend the dispositive motions deadline an

additional thirty days, to and including, November 17, 2005.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: October 14, 2005 /s/ Maria G. Chan 

MARIA G. CHAN

Deputy Attorney General

Attorney for Defendants

Dated: October 14, 2005 /s/ Mark A. Kleiman 

MARK A. KLEIMAN

Attorney for Plaintiff Luparello

The dispositive motions deadline is extended to November 17, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 17, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05783-AWI -SMS Document 87 Filed 10/19/05 Page 2 of 2