Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00412/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00412-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KEITH J. PONTHIEUX, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BANK OF AMERICA; BANK OF NEW 

YORK MELLON, fka THE BANK OF 

NEW YORK; SPECIALIZED LOAN 

SERVICING, LLC; STRUCTURED 

ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENT 

TRUST II, Trust 2006-AR8, aka 5209 

SAMI 2006-AR8-BAC; MORTGAGE 

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION, INC., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-412-KJM-EFB PS 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The action was referred to the 

undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On March 13, 2014, all defendants except Bank 

of America filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 7. That motion was set for hearing on April 23, 

2014. On April 4, 2014, Bank of America filed its motion to dismiss, ECF No. 15, and set that 

motion for hearing on May 14, 2014. Plaintiff seeks an extension of time to file his opposition to 

the March 13 motion to dismiss. ECF No. 13. 

 Pursuant to Local Rule 230(e), the court will continue the hearing on the March 13 motion 

to dismiss so that it may be heard concurrently with the April 4 motion to dismiss. Accordingly, 

plaintiff’s request for an extension of time will be denied as unnecessary. 

Case 2:14-cv-00412-KJM-EFB Document 19 Filed 04/08/14 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

 1. Hearing on both motions to dismiss, ECF Nos. 7 & 15, is now set for May 14, 2014 at 

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 8. 

 2. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time, ECF No. 13, is denied as unnecessary. 

 3. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), plaintiff’s oppositions or statements of non-opposition 

to both motions to dismiss shall be filed not later than fourteen (14) days preceding the May 4, 

2014 hearing. 

DATED: April 8, 2014. 

Case 2:14-cv-00412-KJM-EFB Document 19 Filed 04/08/14 Page 2 of 2