Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03554/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03554-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. C 07 03554 EMC 

#33119 v1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Matthew Franklin Jaksa (CA State Bar No. 248072) 

HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 

Telephone: (415) 268-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 

Email: matt.jaksa@hro.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 

WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC.; 

VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC.; 

UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; SONY BMG 

MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT; ARISTA 

RECORDS LLC; and FONOVISA, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., a Delaware 

corporation; VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, 

INC., a California corporation; UMG 

RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation; 

SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a 

Delaware general partnership; ARISTA 

RECORDS LLC, a Delaware limited liability 

company; and FONOVISA, INC., a California 

corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

JOSE GONZALEZ, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 07-03554 EMC 

Honorable Edward M. Chen 

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case 3:07-cv-03554-EMC Document 7 Filed 10/15/07 Page 1 of 3
 1 

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. C 07 03554 EMC 

#33119 v1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Plaintiffs hereby request that the Court continue the case management conference currently 

set for October 17, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. to January 16, 2008. Plaintiffs filed the Complaint against 

Defendant on July 10, 2007. Defendant has not yet been served. Plaintiffs have attempted personal 

service on Defendant, but have discovered that the address Plaintiffs have on file for Defendant is 

not, or is no longer, correct. Plaintiffs are still attempting personal service on Defendant, and are 

attempting to determine Defendant’s correct address. If Plaintiffs are unable to effect personal 

service on Defendant, Plaintiffs will attempt alternative forms of service. Plaintiffs therefore 

respectfully request to continue the case management conference so that Plaintiffs may continue to 

attempt to serve Defendant. 

DATED: October 10, 2007 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 

 By: ___/s/ Matthew Franklin Jaksa____

 Matthew Franklin Jaksa 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

ORDER

 Good cause having been shown: 

IT IS ORDERED that the case management conference currently scheduled for 

October 17, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. to January 16, 2008. 

Dated: _______________ By; _____________________________ 

 Honorable Edward M. Chen 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

October 15, 2007 A CMC Statement shall be filed by 1/9/08.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:07-cv-03554-EMC Document 7 Filed 10/15/07 Page 2 of 3
 1 

Proof of Service 

Case No. C 07-03554 EMC 

#31048 v1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

I am employed in the office of Holme Roberts & Owen in San Francisco, California. I am 

over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 560 

Mission Street, 25th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. 

On October 10, 2007, I served the foregoing documents described as: 

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

on the interested party in this action by placing a true and correct copy thereof enclosed in a sealed 

envelope addressed as follows: 

Jose Gonzalez 

2548 Camara Circle 

Apt. C 

Concord, CA 94520 

XX BY MAIL: I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and 

processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal 

service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Francisco, California in the 

ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed 

invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for 

mailing in affidavit. 

XX (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this 

court at whose direction the service was made. 

Executed on October 10, 2007 at San Francisco, California. 

Molly Morris 

Case 3:07-cv-03554-EMC Document 7 Filed 10/15/07 Page 3 of 3