Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-01289/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-01289-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Nazreth Derboghossian, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles DeRosa, 

Respondent.

No. CV-14-01289-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 

United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). 

Docs. 1, 21. The R&R recommends that the Court deny and dismiss the Petition with 

prejudice. Doc. 21 at 7. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen 

days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be 

considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 7 (citing Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)). 

 The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to 

review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 

(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is 

not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must 

determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly 

objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is welltaken. The Court will accept the R&R and deny and dismiss the Petition with prejudice. 

Case 2:14-cv-01289-GMS Document 22 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in 

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended 

disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with 

instructions.”). 

IT IS ORDERED:

 1. Magistrate Judge Aspey’s R&R (Doc. 21) is accepted. 

 2. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and 

dismissed with prejudice. 

 3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. 

 4. Because this case arises under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, no ruling on a certificate 

of appealability is required. 

 Dated this 29th day of January, 2015. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

Case 2:14-cv-01289-GMS Document 22 Filed 01/29/15 Page 2 of 2