Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-00236/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-00236-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 2 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 3 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 4 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 5 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 6 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 7 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 8 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 9 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 10 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 11 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 12 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 13 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 14 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 15 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 16 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 17 of 19
Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 18 of 19
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

B. Merits of the Petition 

Due to this Court's detennination that no tolling - statutory or equitable - can 

save this Petition from a finding that it is time-barred under AEDPA's one-year 

statute oflimitations, this Court will refrain from addressing the merits <j)f the claims 

presented in petitioner' s Federal Petition. See supra. pp. 10-11. 

IV. CONCLUSION 

Petitioner filed his Federal Petition on January 28,2013. [Doc. No.1] 

However, the AEDP A statute of limitations, including all applicable statutory 

tolling, ended on September 11, 2000. Further, petitioner has failed to darry his 

burden ofestablishing that he qualifies for equitable tolling based on his theory of 

"actual innocence." Accordingly, this Court RECOMMENDS that respondent's 

Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 10] be GRANTED and that the Petition [Doc. No.1] 

be DISMISSED as time-barred by AEDPA. 

With respect to the recommendations made herein, this Report and 

Recommendation of the undersigned Magistrate Judge is submitted to the United 

States District Judge assigned to this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(I). 

IT IS ORDERED that no later than 30 days from issuance of this Order, 

any party to this action may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy 

on all parties. The document should be captioned "Objections to Report and 

Recommendation Re: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss." 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any reply to the objections shall be filed 

with the Court and served on all parties no later than ten days after beiD2 served 

with the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within 

the specified time may waive the right to raise those objections on appeal ofthe 

Court's Order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9 

IT IS SO ORDERED . ...­

Dated: January 16 ,2014 

United States Magistrate Judge 

- 19- 13cv0236-DMS(KSC) 

Case 3:13-cv-00236-DMS-KSC Document 15 Filed 01/15/14 Page 19 of 19