Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01027/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01027-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN CARD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1027 GEB GGH P

vs.

TOM L.CAREY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 2, 2008, defendant Nunez filed a summary judgment motion. On

January 10, 2008, plaintiff filed a response to this motion. Plaintiff states that he does not

oppose the motion, but reserves the right to re-file charges against defendant Nunez.

The court does not construe plaintiff’s January 10, 2008, pleading as a statement

of non-opposition to defendant’s motion based on plaintiff’s request that he be allowed to “refile” charges against defendant Nunez. If the court grants defendant’s motion for summary

judgment, plaintiff will most likely be precluded from refiling his claims against defendant. 

For these reasons, the court construes plaintiff’s response as a request to voluntarily dismiss the

claims against defendant Nunez. 

/////

Case 2:06-cv-01027-GEB-GGH Document 30 Filed 02/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Nunez shall notify this

court, within ten days, whether he has any objection to the dismissal of the claims against him. 

Should defendant fail to respond, plaintiff's request will be granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(a)(2).

DATED: 02/04/08

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

card.ord

Case 2:06-cv-01027-GEB-GGH Document 30 Filed 02/04/08 Page 2 of 2