Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03039/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03039-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LILIANA SOLIS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 THE REGIS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 05-03039 CRB

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is defendants’ motion to strike. After carefully

considering the papers filed by the parties, the Court concludes that oral argument is

unnecessary, and GRANTS defendants’ motion.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 provides that once a party has amended its

complaint, future amendments may be made “only by leave of court or by written consent of

the adverse party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Plaintiff did not obtain leave of court or

defendants’ consent before adding the paragraphs challenged by defendants; thus the

paragraphs must be stricken. If plaintiff believes she has good cause for adding claims which

she has not been previously granted leave to add, she should file a motion for leave to amend. 

//

//

//

Case 3:05-cv-03039-CRB Document 98 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\3039\orderreamend2.wpd 2

The Federal Rules apply to all litigants, including plaintiff. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 17, 2006

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-03039-CRB Document 98 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2