Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-00988/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-00988-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. C-01-0988-MJJ 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

Donald M. Falk (SBN 150256)

Lee H. Rubin (SBN 141331) 

Shirish Gupta (SBN 205584) 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

Palo Alto, California 94306 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 

lrubin@mayerbrownrowe.com 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

Shawn A. Williams (SBN 213113) 

Willow E. Radcliffe (SBN 200087) 

Eli R. Greenstein (SBN 217945) 

100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 288-4545 

Facsimile: (415) 288-4534 

shawnw@lerachlaw.com

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

Alan N. Salpeter (admitted pro hac vice)

Javier Rubinstein (admitted pro hac vice)

Vincent P. Schmeltz III (admitted pro hac vice)

190 South LaSalle Street 

Chicago, IL 60603-3441 

Telephone: (312) 782-0600 

Facsimile: (312) 701-7711 

jrubinstein@mayerbrownrowe.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Oracle 

Corporation, Lawrence J. Ellison, Jeffrey O. 

Henley, and Edward J. Sanderson 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

William S. Lerach (SBN 68581) 

Mark Solomon (SBN 151949) 

Douglas R. Britton (SBN 188769) 

401 B Street, Suite 1600 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: (619) 231-1058 

Facsimile: (619) 231-7423 

dougb@lerachlaw.com 

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

ORACLE CORPORATION 

Dorian Daley (SBN 129049) 

James C. Maroulis (SBN 208316) 

500 Oracle Parkway, Mailstop 5OP7 

Redwood Shores, California 94065 

Telephone: (650) 506-5200 

Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 

jim.maroulis@oracle.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Oracle Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA—SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE ORACLE CORPORATION 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

Case No. C-01-0988-MJJ 

(Consolidated)

Case 3:01-cv-00988-SI Document 281 Filed 06/16/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. C-01-0988-MJJ 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

DISCOVERY MATTER 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING REMAINING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE CONCERNING 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL (1) 

THE REPORT OF ORACLE 

CORPORATION’S SPECIAL 

LITIGATION COMMITTEE (SLC) AND 

(2) ALL INTERVIEW MEMORANDA 

AND/OR NOTES THAT WERE 

CONSIDERED BY THE SLC IN 

PREPARING THE REPORT 

Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and Civil L.R. 7-12, Plaintiffs and Defendants stipulate as 

follows: 

1. This stipulation and proposed order addresses the schedule for additional briefing 

with respect to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel (1) The Report of Oracle Corporation’s Special 

Litigation Committee (“SLC”) and (2) All Interview Memoranda And/Or Notes That Were 

Considered By The SLC In Preparing The Report (“Motion”).

2. Pursuant to the Court’s Order of June 7, 2005, Defendants are to submit a brief in 

opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion by June 17, 2005, and Plaintiffs are to file their reply by 

June 24, 2005. The hearing on the Motion is scheduled for July 29, 2005.

3. Because of the press of other work in this matter and related matters and the 

complexity of the issues raised in Plaintiffs’ Motion, Defendants need additional time to respond 

to the Motion. Plaintiffs have agreed to grant Defendants additional time to respond to the 

Motion and Defendants, in turn, have agreed to extend the time for Plaintiffs to submit a reply 

brief in support of the Motion.

Case 3:01-cv-00988-SI Document 281 Filed 06/16/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. C-01-0988-MJJ 

4. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to modify the schedule for the 

remainder of the briefing on the Motion as follows: 

x Defendants will submit a memorandum in opposition to the Motion by June 29, 2005. 

x Plaintiffs will submit a reply in support of their Motion by July 13, 2005. 

5. The parties note that, pursuant to this stipulation, briefing on the Motion will be 

complete 16 days before the Court has scheduled a hearing on the motion. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 15, 2005 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

By:____/s/ Douglas R Britton____________

 Douglas R Britton 

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Dated: June 15, 2005 MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

By: /s/ Lee H. Rubin_________________ 

 Lee H. Rubin 

Attorneys for Defendants Oracle Corporation,

Lawrence J. Ellison, Jeffrey O. Henley and 

Edward J. Sanderson 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), Lee H. Rubin hereby attests 

that the signatory’s concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 

ORDER

 Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero

June 16, 2005 /s/ Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:01-cv-00988-SI Document 281 Filed 06/16/05 Page 3 of 3