Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05420/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05420-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S JANUARY 3, 2007 ORDER—C-03-05420 RMW

MAG

E-filed on: 2/1/07

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JAMAR EVANS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

No. C-03-05420 RMW

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S

OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S

JANUARY 3, 2007 ORDER

[Re Docket No. 104]

Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows parties to file timely objections to

rulings of a magistrate judge in nondispositive matters. Such objections are sustained if the

magistrate judge's order is "found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

On January 16, 2007 plaintiff filed his objection to the magistrate judge's January 3, 2007

Order (1) Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions; and

(2) Permitting Limited Expedited Discovery. The court has reviewed the magistrate judge's order

and finds it to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. 

DATED: 1/26/07

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:03-cv-05420-RMW Document 106 Filed 02/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S JANUARY 3, 2007 ORDER—C-03-05420 RMW

MAG 2

A copy of this order was mailed on 2/1/07 to:

Plaintiff:

Jamar Evans 

Post Office Box 25 

Atwater, CA 95301 

Counsel for Defendant(s):

Neysa A. Fligor 

Office of the County Counsel 

70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 9th Fl 

San Jose, CA 95110 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this order to co-counsel, as necessary.

Dated: 2/1/07 /s/ MAG

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:03-cv-05420-RMW Document 106 Filed 02/01/07 Page 2 of 2