Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02789/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02789-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 441
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Voting
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT WOOTEN,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-06-2789 FCD EFB PS

vs.

THE CITY OF STOCKTON,

Defendant. ORDER

__________________________________/

On February 11, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-02789-FCD-EFB Document 23 Filed 03/03/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed February 11, 2008, are

ADOPTED; 

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied;

3. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted;

4. Plaintiff’s request for a three-judge court is denied; and,

5. The Clerk is directed to close the case.

DATED: February 29, 2008.

Case 2:06-cv-02789-FCD-EFB Document 23 Filed 03/03/08 Page 2 of 2