Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-02525/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-02525-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Angel David Smiley, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-12-2525-PHX-FJM

ORDER

Before the court is Petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 6), Respondents’ response (doc. 20) and supplemental responses

(docs. 24, 30 and 36), and Petitioner’s reply (doc. 21) and supplemental replies (doc. 28 and

39). We also have before us the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge concluding that Petitioner’s claims are procedurally defaulted or procedurally barred

and recommending that the amended petition be dismissed with prejudice (doc. 40).

Petitioner has not objected to the report and recommendation and the time for doing so has

expired.

Pursuant to Rule 8(b), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, we accept the recommended

decision of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 40). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED DENYING and

DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc.

6). 

Case 2:12-cv-02525-FJM Document 41 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING a certificate of appealability and leave

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because dismissal of the habeas petition is justified

by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable.

DATED this 17th day of December, 2014.

Case 2:12-cv-02525-FJM Document 41 Filed 12/18/14 Page 2 of 2