Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08159/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08159-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Julie Yost 

Plaintiff,

vs.

Marcus Zihlmann,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-8159-PCT-PGR

 

 ORDER

On November 30, 2007, the Honorable Cindy K. Jorgenson entered a

Scheduling Order (doc. #9 in CV-07-229-TUC-CKJ). On January 28, 2008,

subsequent to the transfer and reassignment of this action, the Court entered an

Amended Scheduling Order (doc. #16). The Court informed the parties in that

order that it was amending the original scheduling order because it used a

standard scheduling order in a different format than Judge Jorgensen’s, and the

Court directed the parties to take notice of the changes made in the Amended

Scheduling Order. 

On February 28, 2008, the parties filed a Joint Settlement Status Report

“[p]ursuant to the Court’s Order dated November 30, 2007[.]” The deletion of the

requirement for settlement status reports was one of the changes made in the

Amended Scheduling Order, and that change was carried over to the Second

Case 3:07-cv-08159-PGR Document 26 Filed 03/03/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The parties are advised that the complete capitalization of the parties’

names in the caption of any document filed with the Court violates LRCiv

7.1(a)(3).

- 2 -

Amended Scheduling Order (doc. #23). To the extent that it was not clear before,

the parties are directed to follow the requirements of the Second Amended

Scheduling Order (doc. #23), not the requirements of the original Scheduling

Order. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the original Scheduling Order (doc. #9 in CV-07-229-

TUC-CKJ) is vacated in its entirety, and the parties shall instead comply with the

requirements of the Second Amended Scheduling Order (doc. #23).1

DATED this 29th day of February, 2008.

Case 3:07-cv-08159-PGR Document 26 Filed 03/03/08 Page 2 of 2