Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04473/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04473-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The Court issued an Order to Show cause on November 7, 2005. That order was apparently never

served on respondent. Counsel for petitioner is ordered to serve a copy of this Orderto Show Cause

on respondent on or before January 9, 2006.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAJESTY IBAY GALI,

Petitioner,

 v.

ALBERTO R. GONZALEZ, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

No. C 05-04473 SI

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Majesty Ibay Gali has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Gali’s

petition states that he has been ordered removed by the Board ofImmigrationAppeals, and that he is currently

seeking review of the order of removal at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Gali’s petition states that he is

currently detained at an Immigration detention facility in Eloy, Arizona. Gali alleges that he has been detained

for more than six months, and that because his removalis not immediately foreseeable, his continued detention

violates 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(6) and 8 C.F.R. § 241.4. 

The Court concludes that the petitionwarrants a response fromrespondent.1 Respondent must file and

serve upon petitioner, on or before February 1, 2006, an answer showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus

should not be issued. Respondent must file with the answer a copy of all portions of the administrative

proceedings that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented in the petition. If petitioner wishes to

respond to the answer, he must do so by filing a traverse with the Court and serving it on respondent on or

before February 22, 2005. 

If the parties wish to modify this schedule, they may do so by joint stipulation. If, after review of the

Case 3:05-cv-04473-SI Document 5 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

parties’ answer and traverse, the Court determines that oral argument is necessary, the Court shall so notify

the parties.

Petitioner’s counsel shall serve a copy of this order upon respondent on or before January

9, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2006

 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-04473-SI Document 5 Filed 01/04/06 Page 2 of 2