Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06436/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06436-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS No. M-02-01486 PJH (JCS)

MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST

LITIGATION,

___________________________________

This document relates to:

STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., No. C-06-06436 PJH (JCS)

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER FOLLOWING 

OCTOBER 19, 2007 CASE

MICRON, ET AL., MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Defendants.

___________________________________/

Pursuant to the Order of the Court, a Case Management Conference regarding discovery was

held on October 19, 2007. The following counsel appeared: Emilio Varanini (State of California),

Jeremy Kasha and Richard Schwartz (State of New York), Eli Freedman (State of Florida), John

Tennis (State of Maryland), Blake Harrop (State of Illinois), Steven H. Bergman and Jane Chang

(Hynix), Charlies Nierlich (Micron), Gabriel Rubin (Elpida), Eva Chan (NEC Electronics), Josh

Stambaugh (Infineon), David Brownstein (Mosel), and Howard Ullman (Nanya). Good cause

appearing, and for the reasons stated on the record, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. Documents produced by the surveyed entities to Plaintiffs shall be provided to

defense counsel on the 15th and 30th of each month. On the 15th, all documents

produced by the surveyed entities to Plaintiffs during the second half of the previous

Case 4:06-cv-06436-PJH Document 93 Filed 10/23/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

month shall be produced. Documents produced during the first half of any month

shall be produced to Defendants’ counsel on the 30th of that same month. 

2. The depositions of Salt Lake County, Boise State University, and the Maryland

entities shall all be taken by the end of November, 2007. The depositions of the

Pennsylvania entities shall be taken by October 30, 2007.

3. Not later than October 26, 2007, the parties shall provide a stipulation setting a time

for Plaintiffs to respond to the contention interrogatories propounded by Defendants.

4. Plaintiffs shall provide to Defendants an updated list of all of the entities that

received a survey not later than October 31, 2007. In the event that any additional

entities are provided with surveys, they shall be identified promptly to Defendants.

5. By October 26, 2007, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands shall

provide the information required in this Court’s Order of August 6, 2007, to wit,

“Plaintiffs shall provide Defendants in writing citations to generally applicable state

laws and regulations that govern the purchasing and/or procurement in each state.”

6. Plaintiffs indicated on the record that they have no objection to discovery by

Defendants on the subject matter of the feedback obtained from the pre-test

distribution of the survey to a small number of survey participants.

The next Case Management Conference is set for December 7, 2007, at 9:30 a.m. One

week in advance of the conference, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement

regarding discovery.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 23, 2007 

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:06-cv-06436-PJH Document 93 Filed 10/23/07 Page 2 of 2