Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01541/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01541-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

C10 1541 RMW PVT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Micha “Mitch” Danzig (SBN 177923)

mdanzig@mintz.com

Susie S. Yoo (SBN 243630)

ssyoo@mintz.com

MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO P.C.

3580 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300

San Diego, CA 92130

Telephone: (858) 314-1500

Facsimile: (858) 314-1501

Attorneys for Defendants URI BEN HUR and

THE SEVENTH MILLENNIUM, LTD.

COOLEY LLP

PATRICK P. GUNN (172258)

pgunn@cooley.com

CHARLES M. SCHAIBLE (173107)

cschaible@cooley.com

101 California Street; 5th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-5800

Telephone: (415)693-2000

Facsimile: (415) 693-2222

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

YES TO, LTD. and YES TO, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YES TO, LTD., an Israeli corporation,

and

YES TO, INC., an Illinois corporation,

and

YES TO, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

URI BEN HUR, an individual, and THE

SEVENTH MILLENIUM, LTD., an

Israeli corporation,

Defendants.

Case No.: C10 1541 RMW PVT

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

DATES RELATED TO

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT & ORDER

Judge: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

Courtroom: 6

No hearing requested

Action Filed: April 9, 2010

Trial Date: Not Set

*E-FILED - 1/6/11*

Case 5:10-cv-01541-RMW Document 33 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 6
2

STIPULATION RE: PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT C10 1541 RMW PVT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 and the agreement of the parties herein, plaintiffs

and defendants have agreed, subject to Court approval, to continue all dates related

to plaintiffs’ pending motion for default judgment by one week in this action

because should the Court grant defendants’ motion to set aside entry of default –

scheduled to be heard this Friday, January 7, 2011 – plaintiffs’ motion for default

judgment will be rendered moot. The parties request the entry of an order in

substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

WHEREAS defendants’ have filed a motion to set aside entry of default

scheduled to be heard by the Court this Friday, January 7, 2011;

WHEREAS plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment is scheduled to be heard

on January 28, 2011 and defendants’ opposition to that motion is due January 7,

2011;

WHEREAS should the Court grant defendants’ motion to set aside entry of

default judgment, plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment will be rendered moot;

WHEREAS, should the parties be forced to brief plaintiffs’ motion for

default judgment but the Court grants defendants’ motion to set aside entry of

default on January 7, 2011, it would result in an unreasonable waste of the parties’

and the Court’s resources;

THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties,

through their respective counsel, that the deadlines related to the motion for default

judgment be extended by one week as follows:

(a) The deadline for defendants’ opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for

default judgment, currently set for January 7, 2011, shall be continued to

January 14, 2011;

(b) The deadline for plaintiffs’ reply in support of its motion for default

judgment, currently set for January 14, 2011, shall be continued to January 21,

2011;

Case 5:10-cv-01541-RMW Document 33 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 6
3

STIPULATION RE: PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT C10 1541 RMW PVT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(c) The hearing date for plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment, currently

set for January 28, 2011, shall be continued to February 4, 2011.

Dated: January 4, 2011 Respectfully submitted,

MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,

GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.

s/Susie S. Yoo

Micha “Mitch” Danzig

Susie S. Yoo

Attorneys for Defendants

URI BEN HUR and THE SEVENTH

MILLENNIUM, LTD.

.

COOLEY LLP

PATRICK P. GUNN

CHARLES M. SCHAIBLE

/s/ Charles M. Schaible

Charles M. Schaible

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

YES TO, LTD. and YES TO, INC.

5278854v1

Case 5:10-cv-01541-RMW Document 33 Filed 01/06/11 Page 3 of 6
4

STIPULATION RE: PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT C10 1541 RMW PVT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Exhibit A

ORDER

Case 5:10-cv-01541-RMW Document 33 Filed 01/06/11 Page 4 of 6
[] ORDER C10 1541 RMW PVT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YES TO, LTD., an Israeli corporation,

and

YES TO, INC., an Illinois corporation,

and

YES TO, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

URI BEN HUR, an individual, and THE

SEVENTH MILLENIUM, LTD., an

Israeli corporation,

Defendants.

Case No.: C10 1541 RMW PVT

[] ORDER ON THE

PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO

CONTINUE DATES RELATED TO

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Judge: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

Courtroom: 6

No hearing requested

Action Filed: April 9, 2010

Trial Date: Not Set

The parties’ stipulation to continue by one week all dates related to

plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment in the above-captioned case has come

before the Court pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 and the agreement of the parties

herein. The Court, having read and considered the stipulation, and having found

good cause shown to continue dates related to plaintiffs’ motion for default

judgment considering defendants’ motion to set aside entry of default will be heard

this Friday, January 7, 2011:

NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERS THAT:

1. The stipulation is approved in all respects.

Case 5:10-cv-01541-RMW Document 33 Filed 01/06/11 Page 5 of 6
[PROPOSED] ORDER C10 1541 RMW PVT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. The deadline for defendants’ opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for

default judgment, currently set for January 7, 2011, shall be continued to

January 14, 2011;

3. The deadline for plaintiffs’ reply in support of its motion for default

judgment, currently set for January 14, 2011, shall be continued to January 21,

2011;

4. The hearing date for plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment, currently

set for January 28, 2011, shall be continued to February 4, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January ____, 2011 ____________________________________

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Court Judge

5278854v.1

6

Case 5:10-cv-01541-RMW Document 33 Filed 01/06/11 Page 6 of 6