Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-01423/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-01423-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 08-1423 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS

DM_US:21311587_1

HOWREY LLP

Henry C. Bunsow (SBN 60707) 

bunsowh@howrey.com

Denise M. De Mory (SBN 168076) 

demoryd@howrey.com

Brian A.E. Smith (SBN 188147) 

smithbrian@howrey.com

HOWREY LLP 

525 Market Street, Suite 3600 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 848-4900 

Facsimile: (415) 848-4999 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AUTHENTEC, INC. 

J. JAMES LI (SBN 202855) 

lij@gtlaw.com

DAVID J. PEREZ (SBN 238136) 

perezd@gtlaw.com

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 

1900 University Avenue, Fifth Floor 

East Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 328-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 328-8508 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ATRUA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Elizabeth Hoult Fontaine (SBN 207557) 

fontainee@howrey.com

HOWREY LLP 

4 Park Plaza, Suite 1700 

Irvine, California 92614 

Telephone: (949) 721-6900 

Facsimile: (949) 721-6910 

MARK L. HOGGE 

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

hoggem@gtlaw.com

SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI 

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

maheshwaris@gtlaw.com

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 

2101 L Street, N. W., Suite 1000 

Washington, D.C. 20037 

Telephone: (202) 331-3100 

Facsimile: (202) 331-3101 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

AuthenTec, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Atrua Technologies, Inc., a California 

corporation, 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. C 08-1423 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16 and ADR Local Rule 3, 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff AuthenTec, Inc., (“AuthenTec”) and 

defendant Atrua Technologies, Inc. (“Atrua”) that the parties to this action hereby select and stipulate 

to mediation as the selected ADR process in this case. 

/ / / / / / 

Case 4:08-cv-01423-PJH Document 28 Filed 06/27/08 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 08-1423 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS

-2- 

DM_US:21311587_1 

HOWREY LLP

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 26, 2008 HOWREY LLP 

By: /s/Denise M. De Mory 

Denise M. De Mory 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AUTHENTEC, INC. 

Dated: June 26, 2008 GREENBERG TAURIG, LLP 

By: /s/Shailendra K. Maheshwari 

Shailendra K. Maheshwari 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ATRUA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:__________________________ 

 

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton, Judge 

United States District Court – Northern District 

of California 

6/27/08

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

MEDIATION SHALL BE COMPLETED 

WITHIN 90 DAYS.

Case 4:08-cv-01423-PJH Document 28 Filed 06/27/08 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 08-1423 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS

-3- 

DM_US:21311587_1 

HOWREY LLP

CERTIFICATION BY DENISE M. DE MORY PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE NO. 45, 

SECTION X. RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California, and am a partner in 

the law firm of Howrey LLP, counsel for plaintiff AuthenTec, Inc. The statements herein are made on 

my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness I could and would testify thereto. 

2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that concurrence 

has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared document with the 

Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for 

subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party until one 

year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct on June 26, 2008. 

/s/Denise M. De Mory 

Denise M. De Mory 

Case 4:08-cv-01423-PJH Document 28 Filed 06/27/08 Page 3 of 3