Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00664/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00664-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM JAMES, No. 2:10-cv-0664 MCE DAD P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 11, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1

Case 2:10-cv-00664-MCE-AC Document 44 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1. The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 43) filed June 11, 2012, are

adopted in full; 

2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31) is GRANTED as follows:

a. Defendants’ motion to dismiss defendants McGinness and Maness in

their official capacity from plaintiff’s fourth and fifth claims is

GRANTED;

b. Defendants’ motion to dismiss defendants Nurse Necoechea and Dr.

Sotak from plaintiff’s second claim is GRANTED;

c. Defendants’ motion to dismiss defendants McGinness, Maness, Nurse

Necoechea, Dr. Sotak and Filer from plaintiff’s third claim is GRANTED;

d. Defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s sixth, seventh, eighth, and

ninth claims based on state law as barred by the statute of limitations is

GRANTED; and

3. Defendants are directed to file an answer to plaintiff’s remaining claims within

thirty days.

Dated: August 6, 2012

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 2:10-cv-00664-MCE-AC Document 44 Filed 08/07/12 Page 2 of 2