Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02650/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02650-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL JAMES LONGORIO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2650 RRB KJM P

vs.

B. JACOT, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On August 14, 2007, plaintiff filed a motion to modify the scheduling order

issued April 25, 2007. Defendants have opposed the request.

A scheduling order may be modified upon a showing of good cause, which in turn

requires a showing of diligence. Jackson v. Laureate, Inc., 186 F.R.D. 605, 607 (E.D. Cal.

1999). In his motion, plaintiff says only that he has not had access to the law library and so

needs additional time “to further his motions.” He has not shown what steps, if any, he has taken

since the issuance of the scheduling order. Because he has not demonstrated his diligence, he

has not established good cause. 

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM Document 32 Filed 08/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s August 14, 2007 motion for an

extension of time is denied without prejudice.

DATED: August 30, 2007. 

2

long2650.sch

Case 2:04-cv-02650-JAM -KJM Document 32 Filed 08/30/07 Page 2 of 2