Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-210/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

CERTAIN DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL 

Master File No. 3:07-md-05944-SC 

William A. Isaacson

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800

Washington, D.C. 20015

Telephone: (202) 237-2727

Facsimile: (202) 237-6131

Email: wisaacson@bsfllp.com

Philip J. Iovieno 

Anne M. Nardacci

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

30 South Pearl Street, 11th Floor

Albany, NY 12207

Telephone: (518) 434-0600

Facsimile: (518) 434-0665

Email: piovieno@bsfllp.com

Email: anardacci@bsfllp.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc., Electrograph Technologies, Corp., Office 

Depot, Inc., Interbond Corporation of America, P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, 

MARTA Cooperative of America, Inc., ABC Appliance, Inc., and Schultze Agency Services LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust 

Litigation

Master File No. 3:07-md-05944-SC

MDL No. 1917

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

CERTAIN DIRECT ACTION 

PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL PORTIONS OF 

AMENDED COMPLAINTS PURSUANT 

TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-

5(d)

This Document Relates To:

Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v.

Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05724-SC ;

Interbond Corporation of America v. 

Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05727-SC ;

Office Depot, Inc. v. Technicolor SA, et al.,

No. 13-cv-05726-SC ;

P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation,

et al. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv05725-SC ;

Schultze Agency Services, LLC v.

Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05668-SC

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2310 Filed 01/08/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

CERTAIN DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

- 1 -

Master File No. 3:07-md-05944-SC 

On December 20, 2013, Direct Action Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc., Electrograph 

Technologies Corp. (“Electrograph”), Interbond Corporation of America (“BrandsMart”), Office 

Depot, Inc. (“Office Depot”), P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation (“P.C. Richard”), 

MARTA Cooperative of America, Inc. (“MARTA”), ABC Appliance, Inc. (“ABC Warehouse”), 

and Schultze Agency Services, LLC (“Tweeter”) filed an Administrative Motion to Seal Portions 

of Amended Complaints Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(d) to file under seal the 

highlighted portions of the following documents:

 Electrograph’s First Amended Complaint

 BrandsMart’s First Amended Complaint;

 Office Depot’s First Amended Complaint;

 P.C. Richard’s, MARTA’s, and ABC Warehouse’s First Amended Complaint; and

 Tweeter’s First Amended Complaint.

Having read and considered the papers filed and arguments made by counsel, and good 

cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Seal 

Portions of Amended Complaints Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7-11 and 79-5(d) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: 

Hon. Samuel Conti

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

January 8, 2014

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2310 Filed 01/08/14 Page 2 of 2