Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01612/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01612-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

KAREN JOHNSON-McKEWAN (SBN 121570) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

The Orrick Building 

405 Howard Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2669 

Telephone: 1-415-773-5700 

Facsimile: 1-415-773-5759 

ROBERT L. SILLS (pro hac vice)

rsills@orrick.com 

OLGA N. SIRODOEVA (pro hac vice) 

osirodoeva@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

51 W 52nd Street 

New York, New York 10019-6142 

Telephone: 1-212-506-5000 

Facsimile: 1-212-506-5151 

Attorneys for DEFENDANTS OJSC RUSNANO; RUSNANO MANAGEMENT COMPANY, 

LLC; RUSNANO CAPITAL, A.G.; RUSNANO CAPITAL, LLC; FONDS RUSNANO 

CAPITAL, S.A.; ANATOLY CHUBAIS; OLEG KISELEV; IRINA RAPOPORT; SERGEY 

POLIKARPOV; AND VALERY ROSTOKIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

NEAS LIMITED, individually in its own right 

and derivatively on behalf of NITOL SOLAR 

LIMITED; and ANDREY TRETYAKOV, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

OJSC RUSNANO; RUSNANO 

MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC; 

RUSNANO CAPITAL, A.G.; RUSNANO 

CAPITAL, LLC; RUSNANO USA, INC.; 

FONDS RUSNANO CAPITAL, A.G.; 

ANATOLY CHUBAIS; OLEG KISELEV; 

IRINA RAPPAPORT; SERGEY 

POLIKARPOV; VALERY ROSTOKIN; 

SHERIGO RESOURCES LIMITED; and 

JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10, 

Defendants, 

 and 

NITOL SOLAR LIMITED, 

Nominal Defendant.

Case No. 5:15-cv-01612-LB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE IN 

CONNECTION WITH PLAINTIFFS’ 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO 

DISMISS AND TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Present conference date: February 16, 2017

Case 3:15-cv-01612-LB Document 97 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

WHEREAS, on September 30, 2016, the Court granted in part Plaintiffs’ Motion 

for Relief from Non-Dispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 82) (the “Discovery 

Order”) and authorized Plaintiffs to pursue specified jurisdictional discovery directed toward 

Defendants OJSC RUSNANO, Anatoly Chubais and Oleg Kiselev; 

WHEREAS, on November 11, 2016, the Court issued its order scheduling a case 

management conference for December 22, 2016 and asking the parties to provide by December 

15, 2016 an update regarding their next steps, including those for the pending motions to dismiss 

Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Dkt. Nos. 46 and 50) (the “Motions”); 

WHEREAS, by Stipulated Order, dated December 13, 2016, the Court extended 

the deadline for submission of the parties’ update to February 6, 2017 and continued the case 

management conference to February 16, 2017 (Dkt. No. 94); 

WHEREAS, following the deposition of Anatoly Chubais held on January 31, 

2017, the parties met and conferred regarding their next steps including, without limitation, 

amendments to the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 43) following the completion of 

jurisdictional discovery and the impact of said amendment on the pending Motions; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that on or before February 28, 2017, Plaintiffs 

will either (i) file a Second Amended Complaint, or (ii) inform Defendants that Plaintiffs will rest 

on their First Amended Complaint, in either of which cases Defendants will file new motions to 

dismiss the First or the Second Amended Complaint, as the case may be, and Defendants’ 

pending Motions will be considered withdrawn; 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to agree on a schedule to govern further briefing in 

this matter; 

WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the parties believe that the case management 

conference should be continued until after the Court resolves Defendants’ anticipated motions to 

dismiss; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 

and 6-2, as follows: 

1. On or before February 28, 2017, Plaintiffs will either file a Second Amended 

Case 3:15-cv-01612-LB Document 97 Filed 02/07/17 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

- 2 - 

Complaint or inform Defendants’ counsel in writing that Plaintiffs will rest on the First Amended 

Complaint; 

2. On or before March 24, 2017, Defendants will move to dismiss the First Amended 

Complaint or will move or answer with respect to the Second Amended Complaint, as the case 

may be, and Defendants’ pending Motions will be considered withdrawn; 

3. If Defendants move to dismiss, Plaintiffs shall serve their papers in response to 

Defendants’ motions to dismiss on or before April 24, 2017, and Defendants shall serve their 

reply papers on or before May 12, 2017. No surreply papers shall be filed on any such motion, 

except by leave of Court granted on motion for good cause shown, on such terms and conditions 

as the Court deems appropriate. 

4. The case management conference currently scheduled for February 16, 2017 shall 

be taken off calendar and rescheduled on a date convenient for the Court. 

5. This stipulation is without prejudice to all claims, rights, defenses and positions of 

each of Plaintiffs and each of Defendants. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: February 6, 2017 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP

By: /s/ Robert L. Sills n

Karen Johnson-McKewan

Robert L. Sills 

Olga N. Sirodoeva 

Attorneys for OJSC Rusnano; Rusnano 

Management Company, LLC; Rusnano Capital, 

A.G.; Rusnano Capital, LLC; Fonds Rusnano 

Capital, S.A.; Anatoly Chubais; Oleg Kiselev; 

Irina Rapoport; Sergey Polikarpov; and Valery 

Rostokin 

DATED: February 6, 2017 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC

By: /s/ Rodney Grant Strickland, Jr.

Rodney Grant Strickland, Jr. 

Attorneys for Defendant Rusnano USA, Inc. 

Case 3:15-cv-01612-LB Document 97 Filed 02/07/17 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

- 3 - 

DATED: February 6, 2017 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP

By: /s/ Ely Goldin

Ely Goldin

W. Christain Moffitt 

Michael A. Sweet 

Jack Praetzellis 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs NEAS Limited, 

individually and in its own right and derivatively 

on behalf of Nitol Solar Limited, and Andrey 

Tretyakov

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, 

Dated: ___________________ ________________________________ 

Hon. Laurel Beeler 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

To avoid losing track of the case, the court calendars a Case Management

Conference for June 8, 2017 at 11 A.M.

02/07/2017

Case 3:15-cv-01612-LB Document 97 Filed 02/07/17 Page 4 of 4