Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01541/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01541-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1541

ICILMA BURROUGHS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SCOTTMADDEN, INCORPORATED,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:07-cv-00193-F)

Submitted: March 29, 2010 Decided: April 19, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angela Newell Gray, GRAY NEWELL, Greensboro, North Carolina, for 

Appellant. Gregory W. Brown, BROWN LAW, LLP, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-1541 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/19/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Icilma Burroughs appeals the district court’s order 

granting ScottMadden’s motion to dismiss Burroughs’ complaint 

alleging claims of employment discrimination and retaliation in 

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as 

amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e – 2000e-17 (2006) and 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1981 (2006) and negligent and intentional infliction of 

emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Burroughs v. ScottMadden, Inc., No. 

5:07-cv-00193-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-1541 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/19/2010 Pg: 2 of 2