Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-3_06-cv-00091/USCOURTS-almd-3_06-cv-00091-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

GEORGE D. McCARLEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-0091-MEF

)

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE ) (WO)

CORPORATION III, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

After an independent review of the file, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 53) is ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice (Doc. # 54), construed as an objection to the

Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, is OVERRULED.

3. Plaintiff’s Brief in Support of ALMD Jurisdiction for 12 USC 1833a (Doc. # 68),

construed as a supplemental objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, is

OVERRULED.

4. Plaintiff’s claims arising under 12 U.S.C. §§ 1831b, 1831n, 1831o, and 1833a are

DISMISSED.

5. Plaintiff’s claim arising under unnamed provisions of Title 15 of the United States

Code is DISMISSED.

6. Plaintiff’s claims arising under 18 U.S.C. §§ 656, 1001, 1005, 1010, 1014, 1016,

1032, and 1621 are DISMISSED.

Case 3:06-cv-00091-MEF-WC Document 69 Filed 05/11/07 Page 1 of 2
7. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 38) is DENIED.

8. This case is hereby REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate

action or recommendation on all pretrial matters.

DONE this the 11 day of May, 2007. th

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00091-MEF-WC Document 69 Filed 05/11/07 Page 2 of 2