Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01373/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01373-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 07cv1373

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODNEY BERNARD BARNO, CDCR #V69078,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 07-CV-1373 JM (WMC)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO AMEND AS MOOT

AND DIRECTING FILING OF

SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Doc. No. 57

vs.

STUART RYAN; JEAN WOODFORD;

CORTEZ, Correctional Counselor; HOMER,

Correctional Counselor,

Defendants.

Rodney Bernard Barno (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,

filed a First Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of

the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. (Doc. No. 11.) Following

Defendants motion to dismiss filed April 28, 2008, the court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims but gave

Plaintiff leave to amend to file a Second Amended Complaint directed only to his Fourteenth

Amendment due process claim. (Doc. No. 55.) Plaintiff now moves for leave to amend to file a

Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 57.)

Because the court granted Plaintiff leave to amend in its previous order, Plaintiff’s motion for

leave to amend (Doc. No. 57) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiff’s

Case 3:07-cv-01373-WMC Document 58 Filed 11/24/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 07cv1373

Second Amended Complaint, which was attached to his moving papers.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 24, 2008

 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller

 United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-01373-WMC Document 58 Filed 11/24/08 Page 2 of 2