Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01522/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01522-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JORDAN CORDELL HUDSON, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA REHABILITATION 

CENTER, Warden, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:19-cv-01522 KJM GGH P 

ORDER 

 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas 

corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as 

provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On December 11, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 14. Petitioner 

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 15 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

///// 

Case 2:19-cv-01522-KJM-GGH Document 16 Filed 03/09/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 11, 2019, are adopted in full; and 

 2. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied; 

 3. The clerk of court close this case; and 

4. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability as to either the outcome of 

straight sufficiency of evidence issue or the related ineffective assistance of appellate counsel 

issue, as neither issue is subject to any substantial doubt. 

DATED: March 9, 2020. 

Case 2:19-cv-01522-KJM-GGH Document 16 Filed 03/09/20 Page 2 of 2