Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00031/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00031-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 07cv0031

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY K. RAVET, an individual,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 07 CV 0031 JM (CAB)

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S EX

PARTE APPLICATION FOR

CONTINUANCE

(Docket No. 88)

vs.

SOLOMON WARD SEIDENWURM &

SMITH, LLP, A California limited liability

company; ASHWORTH, BLANCHET,

CHRISTENSON, & KALEMKIARIAN,

LLC., a California limited liability company;

PAUL METSCH, an individual; EDWARD

McINTYRE, an individual; LESA

CHRISTENSON, an individual; MARC O.

STERN, an individual; JOEL WOHLFEIL,

an individual; MERYL ZENN, an individual;

and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

On October 9, 2007, Plaintiff filed an ex parte application for a continuance. Plaintiff’s request

is hereby DENIED without prejudice, as a result of Plaintiff’s failure to substantiate his request by

setting forth the particulars concerning his other commitments. Should Plaintiff immediately advise

the court as to his particular involvement in “preparation for a trial scheduled to commence on

November 5, 2007, including participating in several out-of-state depositions” (Ex Parte Appl. at 2),

//

//

Case 3:07-cv-00031-JLS-WMC Document 90 Filed 10/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 07cv0031

and should it appear that a short continuance is justified, the court would consider the request upon

such a showing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 10, 2007

 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller

 United States District Judge

CC: All parties

Case 3:07-cv-00031-JLS-WMC Document 90 Filed 10/10/07 Page 2 of 2