Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03749/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03749-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED 

PAGE LIMITS FOR REPLY BRIEFS

Case No. C 06-3749 JSW

18972\2233987.1

James A. Bruen (State Bar No. 43880)

Charles M. Sink (State Bar No. 78168)

Thomas B. Mayhew (State Bar No. 183539)

Carl E. Switzer (State Bar No. 211858)

Arjun Agarwal (State Bar No. 233576)

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 954-4400

Facsimile: (415-954-4480

E-Mail: jbruen@fbm.com

E-Mail: csink@fbm.com

E-Mail: tmayhew@fbm.com

E-Mail: cswitzer@fbm.com

E-Mail: aagarwal@fbm.com

Ned N. Isokawa (State Bar No. 66287)

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky& Walker LLP

55 Second Street

Twenty-Fourth Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: 415-856-7000

Facsimile: 415-856-7100

E-Mail: nedisokawa@paulhastings.com

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

GE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS 

GLOBAL SIGNALING, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID 

TRANSIT DISTRICT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS 

GLOBAL SIGNALING, LLC,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C 06-3749 JSW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR REPLY 

BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Date: May 14, 2010

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Courtroom: 11, 19th Floor

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White

Complaint Filed: June 13, 2006

Trial Date: August 30, 2010

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.

Case 3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document 173 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document171 Filed04/14/10 Page1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED 

PAGE LIMITS FOR GETS’ REPLY BRIEF 

Case No. C 06-3749 JSW

-2- 18972\2233987.1

WHEREAS, the parties’ reply briefs in support of their motions for summary judgment 

are due to be filed by April 16, 2010;

WHEREAS defendant GE Transportation Systems Global Signaling, LLC (“GETS”) 

submits that good cause exists to allow the reply briefs to exceed the otherwise applicable limit of 

15 pages for such reply briefs by up to 10 pages because (1) arguments raised in the opposition 

briefs were not addressed in the opening briefs, (2) BART filed eight declarations in support of its 

opposition brief, (3) 15 pages is otherwise insufficient because of the complexity of the case and 

the importance of the issues within the case; and (4) plaintiff San Francisco Bay Area Rapid 

Transit District has agreed to stipulate to an increase in the number of pages permitted as an 

accommodation to GETS, and for the sake of reciprocity asks that any increase in the number of 

pages permitted apply to both parties;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court 

so order, that the parties may file reply briefs in support of their motions for summary judgment 

of up to 25 pages in length.

DATED: April 14, 2010 FARELLA, BRAUN & MARTEL, LLP

:______________________________________

THOMAS B. MAYHEW

Attorneys for Defendant 

GE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS GLOBAL 

SIGNALING, LLC

DATED: April 14, 2010 CROWLEY, STRINGER & FENSKE LLP

______________________________________

ROBERT B. STRINGER

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT 

DISTRICT

Case 3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document 173 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document171 Filed04/14/10 Page2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXCEED 

PAGE LIMITS FOR GETS’ REPLY BRIEF 

Case No. C 06-3749 JSW

-3- 18972\2233987.1

ORDER

Based on the parties’ foregoing stipulation, and for good cause showing, the Court hereby 

orders that the parties may file reply briefs in support of their motions for summary judgment of 

up to 25 pages in length.

Dated: April ___, 2010

Jeffrey S. White

United States District Judge

Case3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document171 Filed04/14/10 Page3 of 3

15

Case 3:06-cv-03749-JSW Document 173 Filed 04/15/10 Page 3 of 3