Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-01789/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-01789-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Dang, et. al., Case No. 5:14-cv-01789 EJD

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS VU NGUYEN’S

TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1

William F. Abbott

211 Gough Street, Suite 201

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone (415) 863-9337

Facsimile (415 863-9318

billabbott@earthlink.net

Attorney for Defendant VU NGUYEN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California ) Case No. 5:14-cv-01789 EJD 

Corporation and CISCO )

TECHNOLOGY, INC., a California ) STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME

Corporation, ) FOR FILING OF REPLY BRIEF 

) & ORDER

Plaintiffs, )

) 

v. ) DATE: April 28, 2016

) TIME: 9:00 A.M.

CUONG CAO DANG aka CALVIN ) PLACE: 280 South First Street

DANG, ET. AL. , ) San Jose, CA

) Courtroom 4, 5 Floor th

Defendants. ) JUDGE: Hon. Edward J. Davila

____________________________________)

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

1. The undersigned attorney for Defendant VU NGUYEN has requested, and the

attorneys for Plaintiffs have agreed to, an extension of time for Defendant VU NGUYEN to file

his Reply in Support of Motion for Stay.

2. The reason for the requested extension is so that Defendant’s attorney can

communicate with their client regarding the status of the case, the basis for the Reply and the

possibility of settlement.

4. There were two previous extensions in this matter prior to the filing of the

Motion. There has been no previous extension of the Reply Date since it was set.

5. The Extension will not interfere with any deadlines set by the Court.

Case 5:14-cv-01789-EJD Document 186 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 2 Case 5:14-cv-01789-EJD Document 188 Filed 02/18/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Dang, et. al., Case No. 5:14-cv-01789 EJD

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS VU NGUYEN’S

TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 2

6. The extension will not impair the timely hearing of the Motion, which is set for

hearing on April 28, 2016.

THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREIN, THROUGH THEIR UNDERSIGNED

ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(A), HEREBY

STIPULATE that the time for Defendant VU NGUYEN to file his Reply in Support of Motion

for Stay is extended until February 19, 2016.

Date: February 12, 2016 /s/ William F. Abbott 

WILLIAM F. ABBOTT

Attorney for Defendant VU NGUYEN

Date: February 12, 2016 Sideman & Bancroft, LLC

BY: /s/ Zachary J. Alinder 

ZACHARY J. ALINDER

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER

The time for Defendant VU NGUYEN to file his Reply In Support of Motion for Stay is

is hereby extended until February 19, 2016.

DATE: _______________________________

HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:14-cv-01789-EJD Document 186 Filed 02/12/16 Page 2 of 2

2/17/2016

Case 5:14-cv-01789-EJD Document 188 Filed 02/18/16 Page 2 of 2