Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02064/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02064-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD DEWAYNE BASSETT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JEFF MACOMBER, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-2064-KJM-EFB P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2016, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A. The court found service appropriate as to defendant Alcazar, and granted 

plaintiff thirty days to either return documents necessary to effect service of process on defendant 

Alcazar, or to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in the other claims. 

ECF No. 10. The order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation 

that this action be dismissed. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not submitted the 

materials necessary for service, has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to 

the court’s order. 

///// 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-02064-KJM-EFB Document 14 Filed 03/24/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED. Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 41(b); E. D. Cal. Local Rule 110, 183(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: March 23, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-02064-KJM-EFB Document 14 Filed 03/24/16 Page 2 of 2