Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00389/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00389-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID LUNA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0389 MCE JFM P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed June 16, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to file within thirty days an

in forma pauperis application on the form used by this court and was cautioned that failure to do

so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed the required application or responded in any other way to

the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:06-cv-00389-MCE -JFM Document 9 Filed 07/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 27, 2006.

12

luna0389.fifp

Case 2:06-cv-00389-MCE -JFM Document 9 Filed 07/27/06 Page 2 of 2