Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-05530/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-05530-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS L. RUTLEDGE,

Plaintiff,

v.

P. LAM,

Defendant.

Case No. 18-cv-05530-HSG 

ORDER RESETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE

Plaintiff filed the instant pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 

2, 2019, defendant Lam filed a summary judgment motion. Dkt. No. 25. Based on plaintiff’s 

claim that he has been unable to obtain necessary discovery, the Court granted plaintiff multiple 

extensions of time to file his opposition. Dkt. Nos. 30, 32, 36. In its January 31, 2020 Order, the 

Court instructed plaintiff that if he believes that further discovery is necessary, he must file a 

motion to compel that complies with the local rules by February 24, 2020, and that if no discovery 

motion were filed within the time provided, the Court would set a new briefing schedule. Dkt. No. 

39. The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed any discovery motion. Accordingly, by

April 17, 2020, plaintiff shall file his opposition to defendant’s summary judgment motion. The 

reply brief shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after the date the opposition is filed. 

Defendant Lam’s summary judgment motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply 

brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 3/4/2020

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 4:18-cv-05530-HSG Document 40 Filed 03/04/20 Page 1 of 1