Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05781/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05781-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATHANIEL HOLMES,

Plaintiff, No. C 09-5781 PJH

v. ORDER RE FURTHER BRIEFING

TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC, 

INC., et al., 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

On March 24, 2010, the court heard argument in connection with the motion to

dismiss filed by defendant Service Employees International Union, Local 1021. At the

hearing, the court raised the question whether plaintiff could assert a claim under Art. 1,

Sec. 8 of the California Constitution against the defendant Union, in view of the fact that the

Union is not, and has never been, plaintiff’s employer. 

On March 25, 2010, the Union filed a two-page supplemental brief, arguing that

plaintiff could not assert a claim against it under Art. 1, Sec. 8. Before considering the

matter further, the court would like to give plaintiff an opportunity to respond to the Union’s

arguments. Accordingly, no later than March 30, 2010, plaintiff may file a supplemental

brief, not to exceed three pages, addressing the issue discussed in the Union’s

supplemental brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 26, 2010 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:09-cv-05781-PJH Document 18 Filed 03/26/10 Page 1 of 1