Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00408/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00408-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUKOR CAR CARRIERS INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CHEMOIL CORPORATION,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C10-0408 BZ

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFING

By Thursday, April 8, 2010, Eukor shall file a

supplemental brief limited to 5 pages addressing only the

following two issues:

1. The relationship between Eukor and Wilhelmsen

including an explanation for why Eukor appears on Wilhelmsen’s

website as averred by Mr. Tolson.

2. Eukor’s standing to bring this action if the Court

concludes that it is not a party to the contract between

Wilhelmsen and Chemoil, as Eukor asserts, given the rule

established in Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S.

at 309, 48 S.Ct. 134 (citations omitted) and recently affirmed

Case 3:10-cv-00408-BZ Document 17 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

by the Ninth Circuit in Nautilus Marine, Inc. v. Niemela, 170

F.3d 1195, 1196 (9th Cir. 1999). 

Dated: April 5, 2010

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\EUKOR V. CHEMOIL\FURTHER BRIEFING ORDER.wpd

Case 3:10-cv-00408-BZ Document 17 Filed 04/05/10 Page 2 of 2