Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-05114/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-05114-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 – 1 – 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT 

CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

Abraham J. Colman (SBN 146933)

Cristyn N. Chadwick (SBN 280705) 

REED SMITH LLP 

355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514 

Telephone: (213) 457-8000 

Facsimile: (213) 457-8080 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT 

CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MARK CONKLIN, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

EQUIFAX, INC.; TOYOTA MOTOR 

CREDIT CORPORATION; and DOES 1 

through 100 inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 5:15-CV-05114-EJD-NMC

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

FOR TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT 

CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

[L.R. 6-1] 

Compl. Filed: November 9, 2015 

Trial Date: None set 

The Hon. Edward J. Davila 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Mark Conklin (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 

Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (“TMCC”) by and through their respective counsel 

of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on November 9, 2015; 

WHEREAS, on December 8, 2015, TMCC was served with the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A), TMCC’s 

final day to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint was December 29, 

2015; 

Case 5:15-cv-05114-EJD Document 15 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward J. Davila

DATED: 1/15/2016

Case 5:15-cv-05114-EJD Document 16 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 – 2 – 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT 

CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

WHEREAS, TMCC’s counsel was recently retained in this matter and, due to 

an administrative error, the undersigned did not receive notice of the lawsuit or a copy 

Complaint until after the time to respond had passed; 

WHEREAS, TMCC requires additional time to review the allegations before 

responding to the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to grant TMCC an extension of time, until 

January 15, 2016, to respond to the Complaint, 

WHEREAS, an Initial Case Management Conference has been set for April 21, 

2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4, and a Joint Case Management Statement is due for 

filing by April 14, 2016. 

WHEREAS, extending TMCC’s time to respond to the complaint until January 

15, 2016 will not alter the date of any deadline fixed by Court order; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate that TMCC shall have up to 

and including January 15, 2016, to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: January 12, 2016 SAGARIA LAW. P.C. 

By /s/ Elliot W. Gale 

Elliot W. Gale 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Mark Conklin 

DATED: January 12, 2016 REED SMITH LLP 

By /s/ Cristyn N. Chadwick1

Cristyn N. Chadwick 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Toyota Motor Credit Corporation

 1

 Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), filing counsel attests that all other 

signatories listed and on whose behalf this filing is submitted concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 

Case 5:15-cv-05114-EJD Document 15 Filed 01/12/16 Page 2 of 2 Case 5:15-cv-05114-EJD Document 16 Filed 01/15/16 Page 2 of 2