Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02385/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02385-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES HINES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-2385 GEB PAN P

vs.

SERGEANT NUCKLE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed August 20, 2004, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

return to the court, within ninety days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on

defendant Roberts. On February 3, 2006, plaintiff was granted an additional sixty days in which

to provide said documents. That sixty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not

responded in any way to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant

Roberts be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

Case 2:03-cv-02385-GEB-EFB Document 73 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 13, 2006. 

/001; hine2385.fus

Case 2:03-cv-02385-GEB-EFB Document 73 Filed 04/13/06 Page 2 of 2