Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00505/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00505-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1319 Clean Water Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO. 2:06-cv-00505-MCE-GGH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 1

ANDREW L. PACKARD (Cal. Bar No. 168690) 

MICHAEL P. LYNES (Cal. Bar No. 230462) 

Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard 

319 Pleasant Street 

Petaluma, CA 94952 

Tel: (707) 763-7227 

Fax: (707) 763-9227 

E-mail: andrew@packardlawoffices.com 

MICHAEL R. LOZEAU (Cal. Bar No. 142893) 

Law Office of Michael R. Lozeau 

1516 Oak Street, Suite 216 

Alameda, CA 94501 

Tel: (510) 749-9102 

Fax: (510) 749-9103 

E-mail: mrlozeau@lozeaulaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA 

SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING 

PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non profit 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MATHEWS READY MIX, LLC, EAGLE 

MATERIALS, INC. 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:06-cv-0505-MCE-GGH 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITH 

PREJUDICE; ORDER GRANTING 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 

41(a)(2)] 

 

WHEREAS, on December 16, 2005, Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance 

(“CSPA”) provided Defendants Mathews Readymix LLC and Eagle Materials Inc. 

(“Defendants”) with a Notice of Violations and Intent to File Suit (“Notice”) under Clean Water 

Act §505, 33 U.S.C. §1365. 

WHEREAS, on March 9, 2006 CSPA filed its Complaint against Defendants in this 

Court, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Mathews Ready Mix LLC and Eagle 

Case 2:06-cv-00505-MCE -GGH Document 15 Filed 02/12/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO. 2:06-cv-00505-MCE-GGH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 2

Materials, Inc. Case No. 2:06-cv-00505-MCE-GGH. Said Complaint incorporates by reference 

all of the allegations contained in CSPA’s Notice. 

WHEREAS, CSPA and Defendants, through their authorized representatives and without 

either adjudication of CSPA’s claims or admission by Defendants of any alleged violation or 

other wrongdoing, have chosen to resolve in full by way of settlement the allegations of CSPA as 

set forth in the Notice and Complaint, thereby avoiding the costs and uncertainties of further 

litigation. A copy of the [Proposed] Consent Agreement entered into by and between CSPA and 

Defendants is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference. 

WHEREAS, on November 23, 2006, the parties submitted the Settlement Agreement via 

certified mail, return receipt requested, to the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice and 

the 45-day review period set forth at 40 C.F.R. § 135.5 has been completed. In a letter to the 

Court Clerk, dated December 28, 2006, the Department of Justice stated that it does not oppose 

the proposed consent agreement. 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the 

parties that CSPA’s claims, as set forth in the Notice and Complaint, be dismissed with prejudice 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The parties respectfully request an order 

from this Court dismissing such claims with prejudice. In accordance with paragraph 14 of the 

Consent Agreement, the parties also request that this Court retain and have jurisdiction over the 

Parties with respect to disputes arising under the agreement. 

Dated: February 2, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD 

By:/s/ Michael Lynes______________________

Michael P. Lynes 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: February 2, 2007 JEFFER, MANGELS, BULTER & MARMARO LLP 

By:/s/ Scott Castro________________________ 

Scott N. Castro 

Attorney for Defendants 

[Electronically signed with consent of counsel] 

Case 2:06-cv-00505-MCE -GGH Document 15 Filed 02/12/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO. 2:06-cv-00505-MCE-GGH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 3

ORDER 

Good cause appearing, and the parties having stipulated and agreed, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance’s 

claims against Defendants Mathews Readymix LLC and Eagle Materials Inc., as set forth in the 

Notice and Complaint filed in Case No. 2:06-cv-00505-MCE-GGH, are hereby dismissed with 

prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain and have jurisdiction over the 

Parties with respect to disputes arising under the agreement attached to the parties’ Stipulation to 

Dismiss as Exhibit D. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA 

Dated: February 9, 2007 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00505-MCE -GGH Document 15 Filed 02/12/07 Page 3 of 3