Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-01275/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-01275-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joseph Aaron Romero-Mendoza, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Katrina Kane, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-1275-PHX-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) (Doc. 16) recommending that the Petition be denied at moot.

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts

the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not

required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”

(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en

banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s

findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis

in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16)

is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED;

Case 2:11-cv-01275-JAT Document 18 Filed 12/01/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1)

is denied, without prejudice, as moot; the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment

accordingly.

DATED this 1st day of December, 2011.

Case 2:11-cv-01275-JAT Document 18 Filed 12/01/11 Page 2 of 2