Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02928/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02928-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

REVISED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -1- Printed on Recycled Paper 

MARKMAN BRIEF DATES

Case No.: C 04-2928 JW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL J. BETTINGER (State Bar No. 122196) ROBERT F. MCCAULEY (State Bar No. 162056)

PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP LILY LIM (State Bar No. 214536)

55 Second Street, Suite 1700 FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW 

San Francisco, CA 94105 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

Phone: (415) 882-8200 Stanford Research Park 

Fax: (415) 882-8220 700 Hansen Way 

 Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Attorneys for Defendant Phone: (650) 849-6600 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION Fax: (650) 849-6666

ERIC R. LAMISON (State Bar No. 178262) Attorneys for Plaintiff. 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP TELESHUTTLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

555 California Street TELESHUTTLE CORPORATION, and BTG 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1501 INTERNATIONAL INC. 

Phone: (415) 439-1400 

Fax: (415) 439-1500 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE COMPUTER, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION

TELESHUTTLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

TELESHUTTLE CORPORATION, and BTG 

INTERNATIONAL INC., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION and APPLE 

COMPUTER, INC. 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: C04-2928 JW (HRL) 

REVISED STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

DUE DATE FOR MARKMAN REPLY

BRIEF

This Court, pursuant to an Order Continuing Claims Construction Proceedings dated 

September 22, 2005, continued the claims construction proceedings to January 13, 20 and 27, 2006.

Case 5:04-cv-02928-JW Document 132 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 3
REVISED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -2- Printed on Recycled Paper 

MARKMAN BRIEF DATES

Case No.: C 04-2928 JW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

By Order dated October 5, 2005 approving the parties’ September 28, 2005 stipulation, the 

due date for Plaintiff’s Reply Markman Brief was changed from October 4, 2005 to October 11, 

2005.

In the interest of efficient case management, the parties stipulate as follows: 

Plaintiffs’ Reply Markman Brief, which was previously ordered due on October 11, 2005, 

shall now be due on October 12, 2005. 

By her signature below, counsel for plaintiffs attests under penalty of perjury that counsel for 

defendants concurred in the filing of this document. 

DATED: October 7, 2005 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP

 By /s/ 

 MICHAEL J. BETTINGER 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 

DATED: October 7, 2005 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

 By: /s/ 

 ERIC R. LAMISON 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 APPLE COMPUTER, INC. 

DATED: October 7, 2005 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &

 DUNNER, LLP 

 By: ______/s/____________________________

 LILY LIM

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 TELESHUTTLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 

 TELESHUTTLE CORPORATION, and BTG 

 INTERNATIONAL INC. 

Case 5:04-cv-02928-JW Document 132 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 3
REVISED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -3- Printed on Recycled Paper 

MARKMAN BRIEF DATES

Case No.: C 04-2928 JW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: ______

 United States District Judge 

10/12/05

Case 5:04-cv-02928-JW Document 132 Filed 10/12/05 Page 3 of 3