Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01341/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01341-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAGDALENO MEDINA, JR.,

Petitioner,

v.

ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN,

Respondent.

1:15-cv-01341-GSA-HC

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S 

MOTION FOR EXPEDITED JUDGMENT

(ECF No. 3)

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2241. 

On September 2, 2015, Petitioner filed a motion for expedited judgment. (ECF No. 3). 

The Court notes that it does not have an expedited calendar. Petitioner is advised that the Court 

acts to resolve all pending cases in the most efficient manner possible. The Court is aware of 

Petitioner’s pending petition. On September 9, 2015, the Court issued an order for Respondent 

to respond to the petition and set a briefing schedule. (ECF No. 6). Respondent shall file a 

response within sixty days and Petitioner may file a traverse, or an opposition or statement of 

non-opposition to a motion to dismiss according to the briefing schedule. If Petitioner files an 

opposition to a motion to dismiss, Respondent may file a reply to the opposition. Once the 

matter is deemed submitted, the Court will then review the parties submissions. 

The Court notes that the Court’s docket of pending cases is substantial, and the Court 

Case 1:15-cv-01341-DAD-EPG Document 9 Filed 09/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

must act first on those matters that have been pending the longest. In addition, Petitioner has not 

shown exceptional circumstances for expedited review. Therefore, Petitioner’s motion to 

expedite must be denied. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to expedite the 

pending petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 9, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01341-DAD-EPG Document 9 Filed 09/09/15 Page 2 of 2