Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01063/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01063-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

-1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE 

ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, AND RELATED DEADLINES FOR FILING THE REPLY 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Laurence L. Angelo. SBN 34528 (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY)

Allison E. Goldsmith, SBN 238263 

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF 

Attorneys at Law 

601 University Ave. Suite 150 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Telephone: (916) 564-6100 

Telecopier: (916) 564-6263 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COUNTY OF AMADOR, 

A subdivision of the State 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT WOMACK, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF AMADOR, RUSSELL 

MOORE, in his individual capacity, 

DAVID J. IREY, in his individual 

capacity and in his official capacity, 

TODD D. RIEBE, in his individual 

capacity and in his official capacity as 

District Attorney, RON HALL, in his 

individual and official capacities, RICH 

DULOP, in his individual capacity, JIM 

WALSHAW in his individual and 

official capacities, ROBERT 

WERTMAN, in his individual capacity, 

JAMES GARCIA, in his individual 

capacity and DOES 1-10, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: CIV S 02- 1063 DFL DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE THE HEARING OF 

DEFENDANT COUNTY OF 

AMADOR’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN 

THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY 

ADJUDICATION, AND RELATED 

DEADLINES FOR FILING THE 

REPLY 

Trial Date: None 

Judge: The Honorable Ralph R. 

Beistline 

/// 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01063-JAM -DAD Document 79 Filed 10/29/07 Page 1 of 4
-2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE 

ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, AND RELATED DEADLINES FOR FILING THE REPLY 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST AND THEIR 

ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT THIS Stipulation continuing the hearing 

of defendant County of Amador’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the 

Alternative, Summary Adjudication (“Motion for Summary Judgment”), and 

Related Deadline for Filing the Reply (“Stipulation”) is made by and between 

plaintiff Robert Womack (“Womack” or “Plaintiff”) and the defendant County of 

Amador (“Defendant” (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective 

attorneys of record. 

STIPULATION

 

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant’s pending Motion for Summary 

Judgment is set for November 7, 2007, and Defendant’s Reply is due on or before 

October 31, 2007; 

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that a continuance of the November 7, 2007 

hearing date for the Motions for Summary Judgment is necessary in order to allow 

sufficient time for full briefing; 

WHEREAS, the Courtroom Deputy Clerk informed the Defendant’s 

counsel that December 19th is an available date for continuance of the hearing for 

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; 

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the 

parties as follows: 

(1) Defendant’s pending Motions for Summary Judgment shall be set for 

hearing on December 19, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. All filing deadlines calculated by 

reference to the hearing date shall be calculated based on this date; 

(2) Defendant’s counsel shall file this stipulation with the Court 

electronically, in accordance with local rules. The signatories below will transmit 

facsimile or e-mail copies of their handwritten signatures of all counsel on the 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01063-JAM -DAD Document 79 Filed 10/29/07 Page 2 of 4
-3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE 

ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, AND RELATED DEADLINES FOR FILING THE REPLY 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

document filed with the Court according to local rules regarding electronic filing 

of signatures. 

Dated: October 23, 2007 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF 

By:____________________________ 

 Laurence L. Angelo, Esq. 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COUNTY OF AMADOR 

Dated: October ___, 2007 MOLDO DAVIDSON FRAIOLI SEROR & 

SESTANOVICH, LLP 

By: ___________________________ 

 Steven E. Moyer, Esq. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 Robert Womack 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01063-JAM -DAD Document 79 Filed 10/29/07 Page 3 of 4
-4- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE 

ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, AND RELATED DEADLINES FOR FILING THE REPLY 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

1. Defendant County of Amador’s (“Defendant”) Motions for Summary 

Judgment shall be set for hearing on December 19, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. 

2. Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff Robert Womack’s Opposition to Defendant’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment must be filed and served on or before 

December 12, 2007. 

DATED: October 29, 2007 

 /s/ Ralph R. Beistline__________

RALPH R. BEISTLINE, JUDGE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

 COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT 

 OF CALIFORNIA 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01063-JAM -DAD Document 79 Filed 10/29/07 Page 4 of 4