Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-18-02115/USCOURTS-ca4-18-02115-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2115

MISSIONS TO MILITARY ACCOUNT NO. 1 AND ACCOUNT NO. 2; SAFE 

HARBOR CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION; CCR DATA SYSTEMS, INC.; KEITH 

DAVEY,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

and

ALBERT YALE; NORMAN REGISTER; VALERIE REGISTER; MARILYN 

YALE; MARY LYNN VAN HORN; MARCIA CANADAY; JIMMY CANADAY; 

PAULA CANADAY; EDWARD ESTES, III; EDWARD ESTES, IV; CLAGGETT 

AND SONS, INC.; P3T, LTD.; THADDEUS CLAGGETT; EMILY CLAGGETT; 

ERIC LEHNER; DAVID ABEL; JUDY ABEL; JOHN MCFERREN, JR.; ALICE 

MCFERREN; HENRY TURNER; TOM PRINSEN; GERALD WEBBER; ROGER 

PETERSON; TIMOTHY VALENTINE; ROXANNE WYMER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMMUNITYONE BANK, N.A.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00403-RJC-DSC)

Submitted: January 28, 2020 Decided: February 11, 2020

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

USCA4 Appeal: 18-2115 Doc: 51 Filed: 02/11/2020 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sebastian Rucci, LAW OFFICES OF SEBASTIAN RUCCI, Youngstown, Ohio, for 

Appellants. Bradley R. Kutrow, T. Richmond McPherson, III, MCGUIREWOODS LLP, 

Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 18-2115 Doc: 51 Filed: 02/11/2020 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Missions to Military Account No. 1 and Account No. 2, Safe Harbor Christian 

Foundation, CCR Data Systems, Inc., and Keith Davey (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal 

the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant CommunityOne Bank, 

N.A., on Appellants’ claims that CommunityOne Bank violated North Carolina’s Uniform 

Fiduciaries Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 32-1 to 13 (2019). Appellants also contend that the 

court erred in denying leave to file a second amended complaint. We have reviewed the 

parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Yale v. CommunityOne Bank, N.A., No. 3:15-

cv-00403-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 20, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 18-2115 Doc: 51 Filed: 02/11/2020 Pg: 3 of 3