Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00896/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00896-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1. Non-expert discovery SHALL be completed no later than March 3, 20171;

2. Expert discovery SHALL be completed no later than July 31, 2017;

3. The parties SHALL disclose all expert witnesses no later than May 12, 2017and rebuttal 

experts no later than June 14, 2017;

4. The further mid-discovery status conference is set on January 17, 2017 at 8:30 a.m.;

5. Non-dispositive motions may be filed no later than June 30, 2017 and heard no later 

than July 28, 2017;

6. Dispositive motions may be filed no later than August 11, 2017 and heard no later than 

 

1 At the conference, counsel for the plaintiffs indicated that they plaintiffs have not conducted written 

discovery. This is contrary to the statement provided by their previous counsel in July 2015 which 

represents that the plaintiffs propounded and the County responded to two sets of requests for production of 

documents. (See Doc. 25 at 3) Likewise, this is contrary to representations made by plaintiffs’ counsel in 

March 2015. (See Doc. 18 at 3) In addition, at the hearing defendants’ counsel indicated that medical 

records for the plaintiffs have not been received. However, this is contrary to the representation made in 

July 2015 that “County served records subpoenas on medical providers, employers and educational 

institutions relating to records of each of the eight plaintiffs. County received approximately 16 sets of 

records in response to the various subpoenas between March 30 and June 16 of 2015.” (Doc. 25 at 2) 

BRIAN DORA, JR., et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1: 14-CV-0896 - LJO - JLT

FURTHER SCHEDULING ORDER

 

Case 1:14-cv-00896-LJO-JLT Document 44 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

September 26, 2017;

7. The pretrial conference is set on November 7, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before 

Chief Judge O'Neill;

8. The trial is set on January 9, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Chief Judge 

O'Neill;

9. Counsel SHALL meet and confer no later than the end of the day today related to the 

responses the plaintiffs made to discovery requests propounded in late 2014 (See Doc. 25 at 2);

10. All other requirements set forth in the scheduling order (Doc. 14) remain in effect.

The dates set in this Order are firm and will not be modified absent a showing of good 

cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations extending the deadlines 

contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, 

and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish extraordinary good cause for granting 

the relief requested.

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 28, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00896-LJO-JLT Document 44 Filed 10/28/16 Page 2 of 2