Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00852/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00852-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

CARL CAGLE, 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Commissioner of Social Security,

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:15-cv-00852-SKO

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to file her responsive pleading be 

extended until April 22, 2016. This is Defendant’s second request for an extension 

of time to file her responsive pleading. Defense counsel requires additional time to 

fully review the administrative record and consider the government’s position due to 

conflicting due dates, as well as a high workload during this time period. Defense 

counsel will be busy for the next several weeks working with a group of attorneys 

on a large discovery production. Plaintiff’s counsel does not object and agrees that 

all subsequent deadlines should be accordingly extended.

Case 1:15-cv-00852-SKO Document 17 Filed 03/22/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Respectfully submitted,

Date: March 21, 2016 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing

By: /s/ Monica Perales*

Monica Perales

 Attorney for Plaintiff Carl Cagle

(* By e-mail authorization on 03/21/16)

Dated: March 21, 2016 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

 By: /s/ Donna W. Anderson 

DONNA W. ANDERSON

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant shall file a responsive brief by no later than April 22, 2016; 

and

2. Plaintiff may file an optional reply brief by no later than May 12, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 21, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00852-SKO Document 17 Filed 03/22/16 Page 2 of 2