Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01702/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01702-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 12:635 Breach of Insurance Contract

---

1000 G Street 2d Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

phone (916) 449-3800

fax (916) 449-3888

 ||

 1 | |

 ||

 2 | |

 ||

 3 | |

 ||

 4 | |

 ||

 5 | |

 ||

 6 | |

 ||

 7 | |

 ||

 8 | |

 ||

 9 | |

 ||

10 | |

 ||

11 | |

 ||

12 | |

 ||

13 | |

 ||

14 | |

 ||

15 | |

 ||

16 | |

 ||

17 | |

 ||

18 | |

 ||

19 | |

 ||

20 | |

 ||

21 | |

 ||

22 | |

 ||

23 | |

 ||

24 | |

 ||

25 | |

 ||

26 | |

 ||

27 | |

 ||

28 | |

 ||

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

C:\IFOLDE R\MENGLAN D\HOME\TO DOCKET CIVIL\05C V1702.O.0814.WPD NO. 2:05-CV-01702-MCE-GGH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDMENT OF

SCHEDULING ORDER RE TIME TO COMPLETE NON-EXPERT

DISCOVERY

1

DAVID L. PERRAULT, SBN 67109

HARDY ERICH BROWN & WILSON

A Professional Law Corporation

1000 G Street, Second Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

P.O. Box 13530

Sacramento, California 95853-4530

(916) 449-3800

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Crestwood 

Behavioral Health, Inc. and Helios 

Healthcare, LLC 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO

CRESTWOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH,

INC., a Delaware corporation,

and HELIOS HEALTHCARE, LLC, a

California limited liability

company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY, a New York

corporation, ATLANTIC RISK

SERVICES, INC., a New York

corporation, and DOES 1-50,

inclusive,

Defendants.

_______________________________

AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM

_________________________________

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

_)

No. 2:05-cv-1702-MCE-GGH

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 

AMENDMENT OF SCHEDULING ORDER

RE TIME TO COMPLETE NON-EXPERT

DISCOVERY AND EXPERT 

DISCLOSURE

Trial Date: 6/6/07

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto

through their respective attorneys of record that the Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Order of the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California signed November 4, 2005 in

this matter be modified as follows:

Case 2:05-cv-01702-MCE -GGH Document 24 Filed 08/14/06 Page 1 of 3
1000 G Street 2d Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

phone (916) 449-3800

fax (916) 449-3888

 ||

 1 | |

 ||

 2 | |

 ||

 3 | |

 ||

 4 | |

 ||

 5 | |

 ||

 6 | |

 ||

 7 | |

 ||

 8 | |

 ||

 9 | |

 ||

10 | |

 ||

11 | |

 ||

12 | |

 ||

13 | |

 ||

14 | |

 ||

15 | |

 ||

16 | |

 ||

17 | |

 ||

18 | |

 ||

19 | |

 ||

20 | |

 ||

21 | |

 ||

22 | |

 ||

23 | |

 ||

24 | |

 ||

25 | |

 ||

26 | |

 ||

27 | |

 ||

28 | |

 ||

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

C:\IFOLDE R\MENGLAN D\HOME\TO DOCKET CIVIL\05C V1702.O.0814.WPD NO. 2:05-CV-01702-MCE-GGH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDMENT OF

SCHEDULING ORDER RE TIME TO COMPLETE NON-EXPERT

DISCOVERY

2

1. That the deadline for completion of non-expert discovery

be continued from August 7, 2006 until October 13, 2006.

2. Good cause exists pursuant to FRCP 16(b) for the

requested extension in that:

a) Counsel for both parties have been diligent in

their discovery efforts; 

b) Counsel on both sides have had extensive

preparation for and scheduled trials in other

matters which have complicated their completion of

non-expert discovery by August 7, 2006. In

addition, complications in scheduling of very

critical witnesses on both the east and west

coasts due to vacation and business commitments

have made scheduling extremely difficult. Counsel

for both parties point out to the Court that

extensive written discovery has been completed and

additional written discovery is in process. In

addition, some depositions have been completed,

others are scheduled and, yet again, as noted,

others are being scheduled but are difficult to

arrange given the reasons noted above. All

efforts in scheduling have been cooperative among

counsel. Therefore, both counsel are mutually

agreeable to this deadline extension to October

13, 2006. 

5. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order be amended to permit non-expert

discovery up to and including October 13, 2006. 

Case 2:05-cv-01702-MCE -GGH Document 24 Filed 08/14/06 Page 2 of 3
1000 G Street 2d Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

phone (916) 449-3800

fax (916) 449-3888

 ||

 1 | |

 ||

 2 | |

 ||

 3 | |

 ||

 4 | |

 ||

 5 | |

 ||

 6 | |

 ||

 7 | |

 ||

 8 | |

 ||

 9 | |

 ||

10 | |

 ||

11 | |

 ||

12 | |

 ||

13 | |

 ||

14 | |

 ||

15 | |

 ||

16 | |

 ||

17 | |

 ||

18 | |

 ||

19 | |

 ||

20 | |

 ||

21 | |

 ||

22 | |

 ||

23 | |

 ||

24 | |

 ||

25 | |

 ||

26 | |

 ||

27 | |

 ||

28 | |

 ||

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

C:\IFOLDE R\MENGLAN D\HOME\TO DOCKET CIVIL\05C V1702.O.0814.WPD NO. 2:05-CV-01702-MCE-GGH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDMENT OF

SCHEDULING ORDER RE TIME TO COMPLETE NON-EXPERT

DISCOVERY

3

6. In view of the above, counsel for both parties mutually

request that the Court continue and extend expert disclosures from

October 6, 2006 to October 31, 2006. Both parties have engaged

and are consulting with various specialists, however, with the

requested completion of depositions, the additional two week

extension of expert disclosure will ease any pressures of having

to make expert disclosure adjustments given deposition testimony

yet to be provided by persons on either side of this litigation.

Dated: August 2, 2006

HARDY ERICH BROWN & WILSON

 /s/ David L. Perrault 

David L. Perrault

Dated: August 2, 2006

SELVIN WRAITH HALMAN LLP

 /s/ Gary R. Selvin 

Gary R. Selvin

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 14, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01702-MCE -GGH Document 24 Filed 08/14/06 Page 3 of 3