Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00069/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00069-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal as Moot

P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Jf\HC.05\Rogers069ifpapp.wpd

 NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES A. ROGERS,

Petitioner,

 v.

 DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden,

Respondents. /

No. C 05-0069 JF (PR)

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS ON APPEAL AS MOOT

(Docket No. 32)

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 19, 2008, the Court denied the petition on the merits and

entered judgment in favor of Respondent. On March 3, 2008, Petitioner filed a notice of appeal and

a motion for a certificate of appealability. The Court denied Petitioner’s motion for a certificate of

appealability on March 19, 2008. On March 27, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal. However, the Court notes that Petitioner was granted leave to proceed in forma

pauperis on July 8, 2005. Petitioner’s in forma pauperis status will continue on appeal. 

Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (docket no. 32) is DENIED

as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

4/22/08

Case 5:05-cv-00069-JF Document 36 Filed 04/23/08 Page 1 of 1