Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00056/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00056-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1640 Truth in Lending

---

SHARTSIS 

FRIESE LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA

EIGHTEENTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 9 4111

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

Case No. CV

08-0056 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH NEW

CENTURY TITLE COMPANY MAY FILE ITS ANSWER TO THE FAC

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

JOEL ZELDIN (Bar #51874)

SIMONE M. KATZ (Bar #246490)

One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 421-6500

Facsimile: (415) 421-2922

Email: jzeldin@sflaw.com; skatz@sflaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant

NEW CENTURY TITLE COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RICARDO MARCELOS,

Plaintiff,

v.

EDWIN MAURICIO PARADA 

DOMINGUEZ, GLENDA PARADA, 

LORENZO PARADA, COUNTRYWIDE 

HOME LOANS, ARGENT MORTGAGE 

COMPANY, LLC, ND FINANCIAL 

SERVICES d/b/a/ PRIMESTAR 

FINANCIAL SERVICES, SHOAIB 

MAHMUD, NEW CENTURY TITLE 

COMPANY, RECONTRUST 

COMPANY, N.A., AND DOES 1 through 

100,

Defendants.

Case No. CV08-0056 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH 

NEW CENTURY TITLE COMPANY MAY 

FILE ITS ANSWER TO THE AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup

Complaint Filed: January 4, 2008

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Ricardo Marcelos (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant

New Century Title Company (“New Century”) by and through they respective counsel, all subject 

to the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate that New Century will file its answer to the 

allegations of the operative pleadings within ten (10) days of this Court’s Order on New 

Century’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, which New Century intends to file 

on or before May 22, 2008, based upon the following facts and circumstances:

Case 3:08-cv-00056-WHA Document 116 Filed 05/20/08 Page 1 of 6
SHARTSIS 

FRIESE LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA

EIGHTEENTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 9 4111

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Case No. CV

08-0056 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH NEW

CENTURY TITLE COMPANY MAY FILE ITS ANSWER TO THE FAC

1. Plaintiff filed his Complaint on January 4, 2008.

2. New Century filed its Motion to Dismiss the Complaint on February 25, 2008.

3. The Court heard oral argument on New Century’s Motion to Dismiss the 

Complaint on April 10, 2008.

4. The Court issued its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss on April 21, 2008. The Court granted New Century’s Motion 

to Dismiss without leave to amend as to the claim under the Real Estate Settlement 

Procedures Act (“RESPA”), and with leave to amend as to the claim under 

California Civil Code Section 1632, the claim for fraud and deceit, the claim for 

rescission and restitution, the claim under California Business & Professions Code 

Section 17200, and the claim for punitive damages. The Court denied New 

Century’s Motion to Dismiss as to the breach of contract and breach of fiduciary 

duty claims. The Court allowed Plaintiff until May 12, 2008, at noon, to file an 

amended complaint and allowed Defendants until May 22, 2008, to respond to the 

amended complaint.

5. On May 12, 2008, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).

6. New Century intends to file a Motion to Dismiss various claims of the FAC on or 

before May 22, 2008.

7. The parties believe that judicial efficiency and economy will be promoted if New 

Century files its answer to the allegations of the operative pleadings, at the same 

time, once the pleadings are settled.

8. This extension does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by 

Court Order.

9. Local Rule 6-1(a) does not require a Court order when the change in the date for a 

responsive pleading will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already

fixed by Court order.

10. The parties nevertheless want to ensure that the extension of time is acceptable to 

the Court.

Case 3:08-cv-00056-WHA Document 116 Filed 05/20/08 Page 2 of 6
SHARTSIS 

FRIESE LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA

EIGHTEENTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 9 4111

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

Case No. CV

08-0056 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH NEW

CENTURY TITLE COMPANY MAY FILE ITS ANSWER TO THE FAC

Now therefore, based upon the foregoing, the parties hereto stipulate as follows:

The time within which New Century may file its answer to the operative pleadings will be

within ten (10) days of this Court’s Order on New Century’s Motion to Dismiss the First 

Amended Complaint, which New Century intends to file on or before May 22, 2008.

DATED: May __, 2008 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

By: /s/ Simone M. Katz

SIMONE M. KATZ

Attorneys for Defendant

NEW CENTURY TITLE COMPANY

DATED: May __, 2008 LIUZZI, MURPHY & SOLOMON, LLP

By: /s/ Michael E. Hale

MICHAEL E. HALE

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RICARDO MARCELOS

Case 3:08-cv-00056-WHA Document 116 Filed 05/20/08 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:08-cv-00056-WHA Document 116 Filed 05/20/08 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:08-cv-00056-WHA Document 116 Filed 05/20/08 Page 5 of 6
SHARTSIS 

FRIESE LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA

EIGHTEENTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 9 4111

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 4 -

Case No. CV

08-0056 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH NEW

CENTURY TITLE COMPANY MAY FILE ITS ANSWER TO THE FAC

ORDER

Having read the foregoing stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, it 

is hereby ordered the time within which New Century may file its answer to the operative 

pleadings will be within ten (10) days of this Court’s Order on New Century’s Motion to Dismiss 

the First Amended Complaint, which New Century intends to file on or before May 22, 2008.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: _____________________, 2008

HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP

5982\004\SKATZ\1510916.1

May 20

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:08-cv-00056-WHA Document 116 Filed 05/20/08 Page 6 of 6