Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00658/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00658-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GILBERT G. AMBALONG,

Plaintiff,

v.

F. IGBINOSA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00658-AWI-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 15)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (ECF No.

17)

RESPONSIVE PLEADING DUE JULY 2,

2013

Plaintiff Gilbert Ambalong (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2013, Plaintiff filed his First

Amended Complaint. ECF No. 13. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 13, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was

served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and

Recommendations was to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 15. No party filed a timely

Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

1

Case 1:12-cv-00658-AWI-DLB Document 19 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 13, 2013, is adopted in full;

2. This action proceeds against Defendants Igbinosa, Trimble, Jardini, and Green for

deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth

Amendment;

3. Defendants Allen and Yates are dismissed from this action with prejudice for failure

to a claim;

4. Defendants’ Motion for extension of time to file a responsive pleading, filed June 5,

2013 (Doc. No. 17), is granted; and

5. Defendants are granted up to and including July 2, 2013 by which to file their

responsive pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 20, 2013 

0m8i78 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:12-cv-00658-AWI-DLB Document 19 Filed 06/21/13 Page 2 of 2