Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00195/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00195-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LE ROI JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,

Defendant. /

No. C-07-0195 MMC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

SEPARATE COMPLAINT; DENYING

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

DISMISSAL OF JUDGE BERGER

(Docket No. 9)

Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion, filed January 30, 2007, for an extension of time

to file a separate complaint against the El Cerrito defendants. Included in plaintiff’s motion,

although not set forth in the caption, is a separate request for reconsideration of the Court’s

dismissal of plaintiff’s claims against the Honorable Peter Berger (“Judge Berger”).

In an order filed January 22, 2007, the Court dismissed the claims asserted against

the El Cerrito defendants due to improper joinder, without prejudice to plaintiff’s asserting

such claims in a separate action. The Court did not set a deadline by which plaintiff must

file any separate action against the El Cerrito defendants. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for

an extension of time is hereby DENIED as moot.

In a separate order filed January 22, 2007, the Court dismissed all claims against

Judge Berger on the basis of judicial immunity. Plaintiff has set forth no basis for

reconsideration of the Court’s dismissal of the claims asserted against Judge Berger. 

Case 3:07-cv-00195-MMC Document 10 Filed 01/31/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for reconsideration thereof is hereby DENIED. 

This order terminates Docket No. 9.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 31, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-00195-MMC Document 10 Filed 01/31/07 Page 2 of 2