Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-16-07088/USCOURTS-caDC-16-07088-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 16-7088 September Term, 2016

1:15-cv-02099-UNA

Filed On: October 19, 2016

Claire Morin,

Appellant

v.

University of Massachusetts, "UMass", et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Brown and Pillard, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on appellant’s brief and submissions. See Fed. R. App.

P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 13, 2016

be affirmed. Appellant has failed to show the district court abused its discretion in

denying her second post-judgment motion. See Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections of Illinois, 434 U.S. 257, 263 n.7 (1978) (court of appeals reviews denial of

Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion). The motion did not contain any grounds

warranting relief from the judgment. 

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Ken Meadows 

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #16-7088 Document #1641641 Filed: 10/19/2016 Page 1 of 1