Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01052/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01052-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH A. SHERMAN, No. 2:05-cv-1052-MCE-DAD-PS

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

COUNTY OF YOLO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled

action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On April 26, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. 

Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

///

Case 2:05-cv-01052-MCE -DAD Document 17 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by

the record and by proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 26, 2006,

are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s Rule 60(b)(6) motion (Doc. nos. 10 & 11) are

denied.

DATED: June 1, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01052-MCE -DAD Document 17 Filed 06/01/06 Page 2 of 2