Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01007/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01007-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON E. McMURRAY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MERCK & CO., INC.,

Defendant /

No. C-07-1007 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPY IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS; DIRECTING

DEFENDANT TO NOTICE MOTION FOR

HEARING DATE

On August 17, 2007, defendant electronically filed a motion to dismiss the instant

action. Defendant has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s standing orders,

however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day

following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document

that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the

judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45

§ VII.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M.

Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Defendant is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the

Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

Case 3:07-cv-01007-MMC Document 30 Filed 08/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

Additionally, defendant has not noticed its motion for a hearing date. Pursuant to the

Civil Local Rules of this District, “all motions must be . . . noticed in writing on the motion

calendar of the assigned Judge for hearing not less than 35 days after service of the

motion.” See Civil L.R. 7-2(a). If defendant would like the Court to consider its motion, it

must notice the motion for a hearing date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-01007-MMC Document 30 Filed 08/28/07 Page 2 of 2