Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-35/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-13-3826 EMC 

ORDER REGARDING FILING OF

SECOND AMENDMENT COMPLAINT

On November 11, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation to file a revised second amended

complaint (SAC). Docket No. 201. The proposed SAC was attached to the stipulation as Exhibit A. 

The Court approved the stipulation on November 26, 2014, granting “The Parties’ request that

Plaintiffs be granted leave to file a revised Second Amended Complaint.” Docket No. 209. It does

not appear that a revised SAC was ever actually filed, however. The Plaintiffs are hereby directed to

formally file a copy of the approved operative complaint in this matter and label it appropriately on

the docket. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 2015

_________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 318 Filed 07/30/15 Page 1 of 1