Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02044/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02044-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

MINUTES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Randal Scot Combs v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, et al. 

THE HONORABLE JOHN W. SEDWICK CASE NO. 2:06-cv-02044-JWS

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER FROM CHAMBERS Date: April 10, 2007

This order addresses the report at docket 36, and the motions at dockets 33 and

35.

Magistrate Judge Aspey filed a thorough report at docket 36 in which he

recommends that plaintiff Combs' motion at docket 33 to amend his complaint and to

consolidate cases be granted in part and denied in part. No objections have been filed. 

This court reviews the report from the magistrate judge as follows: Recommended

findings of fact as to which a party objects and all conclusions of law are reviewed de

novo, and recommended findings of fact as to which no objection is filed are reviewed

for clear error. Having applied that standard to its review of the report at docket 36, this

court finds the report's recommendations correct in all respects and hereby APPROVES

the report at docket 36, and adopts the recommended findings and conclusions stated

therein. 

Based on the above, the request in the motion at docket 33 to amend the

complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: Plaintiff's request to

amend his complaint is granted, but only to the extent set forth in the recommendations

by the magistrate judge at docket 36.

Based on the above, the request in the motion at docket 33 to consolidate this

case with plaintiff's other litigation is DENIED. 

At docket 35 plaintiff moves for permission to file an amended complaint which is

not on the court's standard form. The motion at docket 35 is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: Plaintiff shall file and serve his amended complaint

to be entitled "Fourth Amended Complaint" within 30 days from the date of this order. 

The Fourth Amended Complaint shall scrupulously comply with the report at docket 36

as to what parties it names and what claims it includes. Failure to conform the Fourth

Amended Complaint to the limitations in the report at docket 36 shall subject plaintiff's

case to dismissal.

This matter is returned to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

 

Case 2:06-cv-02044-JWS Document 38 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 1