Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02140/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02140-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLAUDIA FABIANI,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ORECK CORPORATION,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 05-02140 JSW

NOTICE OF TENTATIVE

RULING AND QUESTIONS

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, PLEASE TAKE

NOTICE OF THE FOLLOWING TENTATIVE RULING AND QUESTIONS FOR THE

HEARING SCHEDULED ON MAY 12, 2006: 

The Court tentatively GRANTS the parties’ request for final approval of class action

settlement. The Court has reviewed the papers filed by the parties and, thus, does not wish to

hear the parties reargue matters addressed in those documents. If the parties intend to rely on

authorities not cited in their briefs, they are ORDERED to notify the Court and opposing

counsel of these authorities reasonably in advance of the hearing and to make copies available at

the hearing. If the parties submit such additional authorities, they are ORDERED to submit the

citations to the authorities only, without argument or additional briefing. Cf. Civ. L.R. 7-3(d). 

The parties will be given the opportunity at oral argument to explain their reliance on such

authority.

The parties shall have fifteen minutes to address the following questions: 

(1) Do the parties have any objection to Cheri Mariotti’s notice that she seeks to be excluded

from the class?

Case 3:05-cv-02140-JSW Document 69 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

(2) Is there anyone present who objects to the proposed settlement or wishes to be excluded

from the class?

(3) Do the parties have anything further to add?

Dated: May 11, 2005 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-02140-JSW Document 69 Filed 05/11/06 Page 2 of 2