Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06525/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06525-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHONGYEE LENGNOU XIONG, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

ANN VENEMAN, Secretary of the )

U.S. Department of )

Agriculture, )

)

Defendant. )

)

 )

1: 02-CV-6525-SMS

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON

SEPTEMBER 9, 2005, ON DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(DOCS. 34, 26)

Plaintiff is proceeding with a civil action in this Court. 

The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge for all

proceedings, including the entry of final judgment, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b), and Local Rule 73-301.

The Court has received the Defendant’s position paper

regarding Plaintiff’s filing of late opposition. The Court has

determined that Pursuant to Rule 78-230(c) of the Local Rules of

Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District

of California, Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion for

summary judgment was untimely, and thus, Plaintiff is not

entitled to be heard in opposition to the motion at a hearing.

The Court is considering Defendant’s motion. However, pursuant to

Case 1:02-cv-06525-SMS Document 37 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Local Rule 78-230(c) and the Court’s exercise of its discretion,

the hearing on the motion for summary judgment previously set for

September 9, 2005, at 9:30 a.m. IS VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 30, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06525-SMS Document 37 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 2