Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03889/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03889-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Litigation of the ADA claim will include the threshold issue of whether Plaintiff fits within

Title II’s “direct threat” exception, 28 C.F.R. § 35.139.

G:\CRBALL\2009\3889\order re 2nd MSJ.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERESA SHEEHAN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO, ET AL.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-03889 CRB

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff

Teresa Sheehan’s remaining claims following remand from the United States Supreme Court

(dkt. 93). As the Court indicated at the motion hearing on April 19, 2016, the motion is

GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is GRANTED as to the negligence claim, the

assault and battery claim, and the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, and it is

DENIED as to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claim and the Bane Act claim. 

Trial will commence on the ADA claim1

 and the Bane Act claim on August 22, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2016 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-03889-CRB Document 108 Filed 04/20/16 Page 1 of 1