Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02758/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02758-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANNY CHARLES HARE, No. CIV S-06-2758-GEB-CMK-P

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

THOMAS CAREY, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is petitioner’s application for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 21). Petitioner’s first application for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis (Doc. 19) was not properly received by the court due to an error in the electronic filing. 

Petitioner has remedied that error by filing the new application. However, petitioner’s new

application is not complete.

Petitioner’s application does have the certificate paragraph on the application

completed by an authorized officer of the prison. However, in addition to the certificate

paragraph, the application must contain an inmate trust account statement, certified by the prison. 

A “. . . certification from the warden or other appropriate officer of the place of confinement

Case 2:06-cv-02758-GEB-CMK Document 22 Filed 08/24/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

showing the amount of money or securities that the petitioner has in any account in the

institution” is required by Rule 3(a)(2) of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. 

Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to submit the required certified trust account

statement. Petitioner and counsel are warned that until petitioner is granted in forma pauperis

status, no attorney fees will be paid. failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal

of this action. See Local Rule 11-110. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall submit within 30

days of the date of this order, a complete application and certification as required by Rule 3(a)(2).

DATED: August 23, 2007.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-02758-GEB-CMK Document 22 Filed 08/24/07 Page 2 of 2