Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00326/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00326-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN VLASICH, 

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

DR. NAREDDY, et al.,

 Defendants.

 1:13-cv-00326-LJO-GSA-PC

 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

 RECOMMENDATIONS

 (ECF No. 21.)

ORDER FOR THIS ACTION TO 

PROCEED ONLY AGAINST 

DEFENDANTS DR. BEREGOVSKAYA 

AND DR. NAREDDY ON PLAINTIFF’S 

EIGHTH AMENDMENT MEDICAL 

CLAIMS

ORDER DISMISSING ALL OTHER 

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Steven Vlasich (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case now proceeds on the Second 

Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff on August 18, 2014. (ECF No. 17.) The matter was 

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 

Rule 302. 

On October 27, 2015, the Court entered Findings and Recommendations, 

recommending that this action proceed only against defendants Dr. Beregovskaya and Dr. 

Nareddy on Plaintiff=s medical claims, and that all other claims and defendants be dismissed 

from this action based on Plaintiff=s failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff was 

Case 1:13-cv-00326-LJO-EPG Document 22 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

provided an opportunity to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations within twenty

days. To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the Findings and 

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 

analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on October 

27, 2015, are ADOPTED in full;

2. This action now proceeds with Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, filed on 

August 18, 2014, against defendants Dr. Beregovskaya and Dr. Nareddy, on 

Plaintiff=s medical claims;

3. All remaining claims and defendants are DISMISSED from this action;

4. Defendants Dr. C. McCabe, Dr. J. Wong, Dr. Williams, Nurse Kayun, and 

Nurse B. Morean are DISMISSED from this action with prejudice based on 

Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted against 

them; and

5. The Clerk is DIRECTED to reflect the dismissal of defendants McCabe, Wong, 

Williams, Kayun, and Morean from this action on the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 3, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00326-LJO-EPG Document 22 Filed 12/03/15 Page 2 of 2