Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05387/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05387-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP

IAN FEINBERG (SBN 88324)

ERIC B. EVANS (SBN 232476)

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 331-4555 

ifeinberg@mayerbrownrowe.com

Attorneys for Defendant, Counterclaimant, and

Third-Party Plaintiff

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AG,

a German Corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation,

 Defendant,

Civil Action No. C 06-5387 RMW (RSx)

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, 

a Delaware Corporation,

Counterclaimant,

 v.

HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AG, a German Corporation,

 

 Counterdefendant,

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, 

a Delaware Corporation,

Third-party Plaintiff,

 v.

LINOTYPE GmbH,

 a German Corporation,

 Third-party Defendant.

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

CASE NO. C06 05387 44032010

*E-FILED - 2/6/07*

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 13 Filed 02/06/07 Page 1 of 3
 

 -2- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pursuant to Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2, Defendant, Counterclaimant, and Third-party

Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated (“Adobe”) and Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant

Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG (“Heidelberger”) respectfully request that this Court enter an

order continuing the Initial Case Management Conference (“CMC”) until March 2, 2007. This

extension is to accommodate a scheduling conflict which prevents counsel for Adobe from

attending the CMC, which is presently on calendar for February 16, 2007.

Good cause exists for this Court to continue the CMC for at least the following reasons:

(1) Heidelberger filed the complaint in this action (“the Complaint”) on August 31, 2006;

(2) Heidelberger served the Complaint on Adobe on September 20, 2006;

(3) As the basis for its claims against Adobe, Heidelberger alleges that Linotype assigned 

its claims against Adobe that accrued through March 31, 2006 to Heidelberger;

(4) Adobe answered the Complaint, brought counterclaims against Heidelberger, and 

brought third-party claims against Linotype on October 30, 2006;

(5) The parties requested, and were granted, a continuance of the CMC until February 9,

2007;

(6) On January 11, 2007, this Court continued the CMC to February 16, 2007;

(7) Counsel for Adobe cannot attend on February 16, 2007 because of a scheduling 

conflict;

(8) Counsel for Adobe and Heidelberger therefore jointly request that the CMC be

continued until March 2, 2007; and 

(9) Counsel for Adobe and Heidelberger have conferred, as required by Civil L.R. 16-

2(d)(2), and affirm that both Adobe and Heidelberger support this request for relief.

January 24, 2007 MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

Ian N. Feinberg

Eric B. Evans

By: /s/ 

Ian N. Feinberg

Attorneys for Defendant

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

CASE NO. C06 05387 

44032010 

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 13 Filed 02/06/07 Page 2 of 3
 

 -3- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

January 24, 2007 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER &

HAMPTON LLP

Steven B. Sacks

M. Elizabeth McDaniel

David DeGroot

By: /s/ 

Steven B. Sacks

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), Ian Feinberg hereby 

attests that the signatories’ concurrences in the filing of this document have been obtained.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

The CMC is continued until March 2, 2007.

As set forth in this Court’s Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and 

Deadlines, all other deadlines are continued accordingly.

DATED: _________________________ ________________________________ 

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

CASE NO. C06 05387 

44032010 

2/6/07

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 13 Filed 02/06/07 Page 3 of 3