Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05327/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05327-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CURTIS OWENS, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

E. ROE, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:03-cv-05327-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 38)

ORDER DENYING FIRST AMENDED

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 11)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On March 17, 2003, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254 in this Court. (Doc. 1). On June 26, 2003, Petitioner filed a First Amended

Petition. (Doc. 11). 

On February 12, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED on the

merits. (Doc. 38). This Report and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained

notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of that

order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

Case 1:03-cv-05327-LJO-TAG Document 44 Filed 03/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed February 12, 2007 (Doc. 38), is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 11), is DENIED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05327-LJO-TAG Document 44 Filed 03/12/07 Page 2 of 2