Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01515/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01515-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The failure of one or more of the parties to participate in the preparation of the Joint

Status Report does not excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file a status report

in accordance with this Order. In the event a party fails to participate as ordered, the party timely

submitting the status report shall include a declaration explaining why it was unable to obtain the

cooperation of the other party or parties.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT N. JOHNSON )

) 2:07-cv-01515-GEB-GGH

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION, ) CONFERENCE

BENCHMARK PROPERTIES, LLC )

)

Defendants. )

)

Plaintiff’s Status Report filed October 10, 2007, reveals

this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for October 29, 2007, is

continued to December 10, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status

report shall be filed no later than November 26, 2007.1

Plaintiff is hereby notified that this action may be

dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) if Defendant

Benchmark Properties, LLC, is not served by November 23, 2007. To

avoid dismissal, a proof of service shall be filed for Defendant Young

no later than November 26, 2007. 

If Plaintiff believes it has good cause to justify extension

Case 2:07-cv-01515-GEB-GGH Document 9 Filed 10/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

of Rule 4(m)’s 120-day service period for Defendant Benchmark

Properties, LLC, it shall file a declaration no later than November

23, 2007, showing "good cause" why the action should not be dismissed

without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-01515-GEB-GGH Document 9 Filed 10/25/07 Page 2 of 2