Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00504/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00504-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY A. AUSTIN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant. /

Nos. 3:15-cv-00504-CRB

3:15-cv-00505-CRB

3:15-cv-00508-CRB

3:15-cv-00510-CRB

3:15-cv-00511-CRB

3:15-cv-00512-CRB

3:15-cv-00513-CRB

3:15-cv-00514-CRB

3:15-cv-00516-CRB

3:15-cv-00526-CRB

3:15-cv-00528-CRB

3:15-cv-00533-CRB

3:15-cv-00535-CRB

3:15-cv-01717-CRB

ORDER DENYING REDRESS

On April 1, 2015, the Court dismissed each and every one of the above cases with

prejudice and then entered judgment against Plaintiff. See IFP Order (dkt. 22) at 12;

Judgment (dkt. 23). That was no April Fool’s joke. So to the extent Plaintiff’s “Writ of

Certiorari,” “Plead to Waive Time Limit,” “Stance on Marital Dissolution,” and “Initial

Grievance Petition Attachment” can be read to seek redress of some kind, they are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 12, 2017 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-00504-CRB Document 26 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 1