Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-md-01486/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-md-01486-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS No. M-02-1486 PJH (JCS)

MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST

LITIGATION,

___________________________________ AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

DISCOVERY PLAN

This document relates to:

ALL ACTIONS.

___________________________________/

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

Pursuant to the agreement of counsel, the Discovery Plan is amended as follows:

1. The direct and indirect plaintiffs collectively may depose up to 75 percipient

witnesses as part of the joint, coordinated discovery in this case, subject to the

limitation in Paragraph 2 below.

2. The direct and indirect plaintiffs collectively may depose up to 15 current or former

employees of each Defendant Group. For this purpose, defendants that are part of the

same corporate family constitute a single Defendant Group, so for example Hynix

Semiconductor, Inc. and Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc. constitute a single

Defendant Group and likewise Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor

Products, Inc., and Crucial Technology, Inc. constitute a single Defendant Group.

3. The defendants collectively may take up to 40 depositions, in addition to the

depositions of class representatives.

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 731 Filed 03/08/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. The direct and indirect plaintiffs collectively may take up to 14 hours of 30(b)(6)

depositions of each Defendant Group as part of the joint, coordinated discovery. The

parties are meeting and conferring about 30(b)(6) topics and witnesses.

5. The defendants and counsel for the indirect purchaser plaintiffs will meet and confer

on limits for separate depositions on issues unique to the indirect purchaser claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2006 

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 731 Filed 03/08/06 Page 2 of 2