Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-01112/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-01112-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:405 Fair Housing Act

---

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kyra Kazantzis, Bar # 154612 (kyrak@lawfoundation.org) 

James Zahradka, Bar # 196822 (jamesz@lawfoundation.org) 

PUBLIC INTEREST LAW FIRM 

Law Foundation of Silicon Valley 

111 West Saint John Street, Suite 315 

San Jose, California 95113 

Telephone: 408-280-2401 

Facsimile: 408-293-0106 

Michael Allen, pro hac vice (mallen@relmanlaw.com) 

RELMAN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 

1225 Nineteenth Street, N.W., Suite 600 

Washington, D. C. 20036 

Telephone: (202) 728-1888 

Facsimile: (202) 728-0848 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN JOSE DIVISION) 

ALYSSA C., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

PALO ALTO HOUSING CORP., PALO 

ALTO HOUSING SERVICES, LLC, AND 

THE CITY OF PALO ALTO 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: C07 01112 JW/RS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE 

PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT 

WHEREAS the parties in this action (“Action”) have met and agreed to voluntarily 

participate in negotiations in a good faith effort to achieve an informal resolution of the Action; 

WHEREAS the parties have entered into a previous Stipulation, which was signed and 

entered by the Court, extending Defendants CITY OF PALO ALTO, PALO ALTO HOUSING 

CORPORATION AND PALO HOUSING SERVICES, LLC’S time to respond to the Complaint 

to October 12, 2007, and moving the Initial Case Management Conference and hearing of 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss to November 26, 2007; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:07-cv-01112-JW Document 23 Filed 09/20/07 Page 1 of 3
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ put forth a settlement offer in the beginning of July 2007, and 

Defendants presented a counter-offer on August 16, 2007; 

WHEREAS the parties intend to continue settlement negotiations, but that the discussions 

have been temporarily suspended due to Ms. Croft’s ill health, which has prevented her from 

participating in settlement negotiations and giving guidance to her counsel; 

WHEREAS the parties believe that extending the time for Defendants to file a responsive 

pleading again will facilitate the parties’ efforts to achieve an informal resolution of the Action; 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between 

Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, that Defendants 

will have until January 10, 2008, to file their motion to dismiss to the Complaint. Said Motion 

shall be heard after February 25, 2008, subject to the Court’s availability. 

Moreover, the parties request that the Court reset the Case Management Conference in 

this Action to correspond to the date of the hearing of Defendants’ motion to dismiss, which will 

be no earlier than February 25, 2008. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: September _11__, 2007 STUBBS & LEONE 

 ___/S/__________________________________ 

 LOUIS A. LEONE, ESQ. 

KATHERINE A. ALBERTS, ESQ. 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 CITY OF PALO ALTO, PALO ALTO HOUSING 

 CORPORATION and PALO HOUSING 

 SERVICES, LLC 

Dated: September _18___, 2007 PUBLIC INTEREST LAW FIRM

 ___/S/__________________________________ 

 KYRA KAZANTZIS 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 ALYSSA C. 

Case 5:07-cv-01112-JW Document 23 Filed 09/20/07 Page 2 of 3
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Signature Attestation

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 

 

Dated: July 19, 2007 /S/ Kyra Kazantzis________________ 

Kyra Kazantzis 

Attorney for plaintiffs 

 

ORDER 

For the reasons set forth above, 

Defendants will have until January 10, 2008, to file their motion to dismiss to the 

Complaint. 

The Case Management Conference and hearing regarding Defendants’ anticipated 

Motion to Dismiss are hereby continued from November 26, 2007. Defendants’ anticipated 

motion to dismiss shall be heard on _____________________ at ________; the Case 

Management Conference is now set for __________________ at ________. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________________ _____________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE 

 United States District Judge

motion to dismiss shall be heard on February 25, 2008 at 9 AM. The Court will set a case 

management conference in its Order addressing Defendants' putative motion to dismiss. In 

the event Defendants do not file a motion to dismiss on January 10, 2008, the Court will 

conduct a Case Management Conference on February 25, 2008 at 10 a.m. Pursuant to the 

Civil Local Rules, the parties shall file a joint case management conference statement ten (10) 

days before the date of the conference. 

 

 This is the parties' final continuance. 

Dated: September 20, 2007 _______________________________ 

 JAMES WARE 

United States District Judge 

Case 5:07-cv-01112-JW Document 23 Filed 09/20/07 Page 3 of 3