Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00686/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00686-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-PA/3582343.1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: MOTION 

TO COMPEL HEARING (NO. C05 00686 SBA (EMC))

FRANKLIN BROCKWAY GOWDY, SBN 

47918 

THOMAS D. KOHLER, SBN 207917 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

DAVID C. BOHRER, SBN 212397 

MICHAEL J. LYONS, SBN 202284 

DION M. BREGMAN, SBN 208393 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

2 Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2122 

Tel: 650.843.4000 

Fax: 650.843.4001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

NIDEC CORPORATION 

MARTIN R. GLICK, SBN 40187 

SIMON J. FRANKEL, SBN 171552 

HOWARD RICK NEMEROVSKI 

CANADY FALK & RABKIN 

A Professional Corporation 

Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 

Tel: 415.434.1600 

Fax: 415.217.5910 

MORTON AMSTER (pro hac vice) 

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO (pro hac vice) 

CHARLES R. MACEDO (pro hac vice) 

AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP

90 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10016 

Tel: 212.336.8000 

Fax: 212.336.8001 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

JVC COMPONENTS (THAILAND) CO., 

LTD., AGILIS, Inc., and AGILIS 

TECHNOLOGY INC. and Defendant and 

Counter-Claimant, 

VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

NIDEC CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD., 

JVC COMPONENTS (THAILAND) CO., 

LTD., AGILIS, INC., and AGILIS 

TECHNOLOGY INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. C05 00686 SBA (EMC) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON 

MOTIONS TO COMPEL FROM 

APRIL 19, 2006 TO APRIL 26, 2006 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 83 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 1 of 5

May 3, 2006

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 84 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-PA/3582343.1 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: MOTION 

TO COMPEL HEARING (NO. C05 00686 SBA (EMC))

Plaintiff Nidec Corporation “Nidec”) and Defendants Victor Company of Japan, Ltd., 

JVC Components (Thailand) Co., Agilis Inc. and Agilis Technology Inc. (collectively, 

“Defendants”) respectfully submit this Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Continuing Hearing On 

Motions To Compel From April 19, 2006 To April 26, 2006, as follows: 

WHEREAS, on March 1, 2006, the Defendants filed a Motion To Compel Plaintiff Nidec 

Corporation To Provide Complete Preliminary Infringement Contentions Under Patent L.R. 3-1 

And To Preclude Nidec Corporation’s Belated And Unauthorized Assertion Of Additional Claim 

Of Infringement (“Defendants’ Motion To Compel”) [D.I. 38]; 

WHEREAS, on March 8, 2006, Nidec filed a Motion To Compel Defendants To Provide 

Complete Preliminary Infringement Contentions Pursuant To Patent L.R. 3-1 (“Nidec’s Motion 

To Compel”) [D.I. 53]; 

WHEREAS, the Defendants’ Motion To Compel and Nidec’s Motion To Compel are 

currently scheduled for hearing before the Court on April 19, 2006 at 10:30 am; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to continue the hearing of their Motions To Compel 

to April 26, 2006 at 10:30 am; 

WHEREAS, the parties have further agreed to file oppositions to the Motions To Compel 

by April 5, 2006 and replies if the Court finds that the Defendants’ infringement contentions are 

deficient for failure to identify the shape of fixtures used in the manufacture of components of the 

accused products, then the Court should order Nidec to produce documents providing that 

information before Defendants are required to supplement their Preliminary Infringement 

Contentions; 

WHEREAS, Nidec has no objection to the Defendants’ inclusion of its request in its 

opposition and of the Court’s consideration of the Defendants’ request at the April 26, 2006 

hearing; 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, Nidec and the Defendants 

hereby agree that: (1) the hearing of their respective Motions To Compel shall be continued to 

April 26, 2006; (2) oppositions to the Motions To Compel shall be due by April 5, 2006; (3) 

replies in support of the Motions To Compel shall be due by April 12, 2006; (4) the Defendants 

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 83 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 2 of 5

May 3, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. April 12, 2006 April 19, 2006

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 84 Filed 03/29/06 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-PA/3582343.1 3 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: MOTION 

TO COMPEL HEARING (NO. C05 00686 SBA (EMC))

may request in their opposition to Nidec’s Motion To Compel that, if the Court finds that the 

Defendants’ infringement contentions are deficient for failure to identify the shape of fixtures 

used in the manufacture of components of the accused products, that the Court should order 

Nidec to produce documents providing that information before Defendants are required to 

supplement their Preliminary Infringement Contentions; and (5) the Court may consider the 

Defendants’ request at the April 26, 2006 hearing. 

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. 

Dated: March 29, 2006 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

FRANKLIN BROCKWAY GOWDY 

THOMAS D. KOHLER 

DAVID C. BOHRER 

MICHAEL J. LYONS 

By: /s/ David C. Bohrer 

 David C. Bohrer 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant 

NIDEC CORPORATION 

Dated: March 29, 2006 HOWARD RICK NEMEROVSKI CANADY 

FALK & RABKIN 

MARTIN R. GLICK 

SIMON J. FRANKEL 

AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP

MORTON AMSTER (pro hac vice) 

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO (pro hac vice) 

CHARLES R. MACEDO (pro hac vice) 

By: /s/ Anthony F. Lo Cicero 

 Anthony F. Lo Cicero 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JVC Components (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Agilis 

Inc., and Agilis Technology Inc., and 

Defendant and Counter-plaintiff Victor 

Company Of Japan, Ltd. 

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 83 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 3 of 5

May 3, 2006

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 84 Filed 03/29/06 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-PA/3582343.1 4 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: MOTION 

TO COMPEL HEARING (NO. C05 00686 SBA (EMC))

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: HON. EDWARD M. CHEN 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 83 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 4 of 5

March 29, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 84 Filed 03/29/06 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-PA/3582343.1 5 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: MOTION 

TO COMPEL HEARING (NO. C05 00686 SBA (EMC))

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I, David C. Bohrer, 

attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 

signatories. 

I declare under penalty of perjury foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 29th day of 

March 2006. 

 /s/ David C. Bohrer 

David C. Bohrer 

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 83 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 5 of 5
 Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 84 Filed 03/29/06 Page 5 of 5