Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01114/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01114-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERNARD ANDREW WHITE,

Plaintiff,

v.

SANDRA M. SNYDER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01114-AWI DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF

MAY BE GRANTED

(Doc. 1)

THIS DISMISSAL SHALL COUNT AS A

STRIKE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(g)

Plaintiff Bernard Andrew White (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 13, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein

which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the

Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within fifteen days. Plaintiff filed an Objection to

the Findings and Recommendations on August 22, 2008.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. While Plaintiff objects

to the Magistrate Judge’s finding that the Defendant Judges are entitled to immunity because Judges

can be sued when they act without jurisdiction, nothing in the objections or complaint allege or show

how Defendant Judges were without jurisdiction in his prior action.

Case 1:08-cv-01114-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 09/23/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 13, 2008, is adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may

be granted; and

3. This action shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) because it is being

dismissed for failure to state a claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 20, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-01114-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 09/23/08 Page 2 of 2