Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_19-cv-05295/USCOURTS-azd-2_19-cv-05295-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Plaintiff filed a complaint commencing this action on October 1, 2019 (Doc. 1). On 

December 25, 2019, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11). In an Order dated 

October 28, 2019 (Doc. 15), the Court directed that Plaintiff Hanming Wang had until 

November 27, 2019 to file a response, and was warned that his failure “to respond to the 

Motion to Dismiss may in the discretion of the Court be deemed as consent to the granting 

of that Motion without further notice, and judgment may be entered dismissing the 

complaint and action with prejudice pursuant to LRCiv 7.2(i).” Plaintiff was subsequently 

given an extension until January 6, 2020 (Doc. 20). When Plaintiff failed to respond and 

the time to do so had passed, on February 13, 2020, the Motion to Dismiss was granted and 

the action was dismissed (Doc. 25). On March 3, 2020, this Court further denied (Doc. 27) 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. 26). 

On March 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Motion entitled “I Request to Proceed,” in which 

he requests to file an amended complaint within one week (Doc. 28). The Court will thus 

construe it as a Motion to Amend. Because this case is closed, the underlying action has 

Hanming Wang,

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GoDaddy.com LLC,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-19-05295-PHX-SPL

ORDER

Case 2:19-cv-05295-SPL Document 29 Filed 03/05/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

been dismissed, and Petitioner has failed to identify any legitimate authority which permits 

such a filing, the motion will be denied. Plaintiff is advised that any future filings that are 

not authorized by the local and federal rules will likewise be denied. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Doc. 28) is denied.

Dated this 5th day of March, 2020.

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge

Case 2:19-cv-05295-SPL Document 29 Filed 03/05/20 Page 2 of 2