Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-01660/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-01660-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

00087130-1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT FRESNO DEPUTY 

SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Gary M. Messing, Bar No. 75363

 gary@majlabor.com

Jason H Jasmine, Bar No. 215757

 jason@majlabor.com

Monique Alonso, Bar No. 127078

 monique@majlabor.com

MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP

980 9th Street, Suite 380

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: 916.446.5297

Facsimile: 916.448.5047

Attorneys for Defendant

FRESNO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

CESAR CAMPOS and LATANA M. 

CHANDAVONG, on behalf of themselves and

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FRESNO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S 

ASSOCIATION, COUNTY OF FRESNO; 

XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity 

as Attorney General of the State of California; 

ERIC BANKS, PRISCILLA WINSLOW, 

ERICH SHINERS, and ARTHUR A. 

KRANTZ, in their official capacities as chair 

and members of the California Public 

Employment Relations Board,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:18-cv-01660 AWI-EPG

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR 

DEFENDANT FRESNO DEPUTY 

SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION TO 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

(ECF No. 63)

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, plaintiffs filed their “Class-Action Complaint” on December 6, 2018;

WHEREAS, defendant Fresno Deputy Sheriff’s Association (the “FDSA”) filed its 

response on April 29, 2019;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on May 12, 2019;

Case 1:18-cv-01660-AWI-EPG Document 64 Filed 04/27/20 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

00087130-1 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT FRESNO DEPUTY 

SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

WHEREAS, defendants FDSA and the State of California filed Motions to Dismiss on 

June 24, 2019, and the FDSA filed an Amended Motion to Dismiss on June 29, 2019;

WHEREAS, on February 27, 2020, the Court ruled on defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, 

granting plaintiffs leave to amend the first and second causes of action in the FAC, dismissing the 

fourth, fifth and sixth causes of action in the FAC, and dismissing defendant State of California

(the “Order”);

WHEREAS, plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on March 19, 

2020;

WHEREAS, the FDSA’s response to the SAC was originally due on April 2, 2020;

WHEREAS, due to the COVID 19 emergency shelter in place in the Bay Area and 

generally, due to the nationwide disruption caused by the pandemic, the parties agreed to a onemonth extension of time within which the FDSA would respond to the SAC;

WHEREAS, on March 25, 2020, the Court approved the parties’ Stipulation for a onemonth extension to May 2, 2020 for the FDSA to respond to the SAC;

WHEREAS, since that time defendant’s counsel, Monique Alonso, has been ill and has 

been unable to attend to preparing the FDSA’s response to the SAC;

WHEREAS, the parties are also meeting and conferring regarding whether motion practice 

may be avoided; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a further one-month extension of time within which 

the FDSA may respond to the SAC;

IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs and the FDSA, 

and an order of this Court is requested, that the FDSA’s deadline to respond to the SAC be

extended to June 2, 2020.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 1:18-cv-01660-AWI-EPG Document 64 Filed 04/27/20 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

00087130-1 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT FRESNO DEPUTY 

SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Dated: April 24, 2020 MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP

By /s/ Monique Alonso

Monique Alonso

Attorneys for Defendant 

FRESNO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION

Dated: April 24, 2020 MITCHELL LAW PLLC

By /s/ Jonathan Mitchell

Jonathan Mitchell

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CESAR CAMPOS, et al. 

Case 1:18-cv-01660-AWI-EPG Document 64 Filed 04/27/20 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

00087130-1 4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT FRESNO DEPUTY 

SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 63), and finding good cause exists, 

IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant FRESNO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S 

ASSOCIATION to file a response to the Second Amended Complaint is extended to June 2, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2020 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:18-cv-01660-AWI-EPG Document 64 Filed 04/27/20 Page 4 of 4