Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01145/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01145-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEHEMIAH JEFF FISHER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1145 LKK DAD P

vs.

DOCTOR RAUL MISCHIU, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed October 25, 2005, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

return to the court, within sixty days, the documents necessary to effect service on defendant

Smith. That sixty-day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the

court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant

Smith be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:05-cv-01145-LKK -DAD Document 26 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 11, 2006.

DAD:lg

fish1145.fusm

Case 2:05-cv-01145-LKK -DAD Document 26 Filed 01/11/06 Page 2 of 2