Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00463/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00463-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARC EDWARD BOWMAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0463 JAM EFB PS

vs.

ASSOCIATES HOME EQUITY ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

SERVICE, et al., 

Defendants. 

 /

This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, was referred to the undersigned

pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Findings and 

Recommendations were issued on February 20, 2008, recommending that plaintiff’s claim for

conversion be dismissed and that portions of the complaint related to punitive damages be

stricken. Filed with the February 20, 2008, findings and recommendations was an order

directing the parties to file status reports within twenty days of the district judge’s ruling on the

findings and recommendations. Further, that order specified that “should the district judge adopt

[the] findings and recommendations in full, plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint

consistent with that order, within ten days from the date of service of that order.” See February

20, 2008, Order and Findings and Recommendations. On April 4, 2008, the district judge

adopted those findings and recommendation. 

Case 2:06-cv-00463-JAM-EFB Document 39 Filed 05/29/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Defendant timely filed a status report on April 24, 2008. However, plaintiff has failed to

file the second amended complaint or status report as ordered. According, plaintiff is ordered to

show cause, in writing, within ten days from the date of service of this order why this case

should not be dismissed for failure to obey court orders and for failure to prosecute. See Local

Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Failure to timely respond to this order, in writing, will result

in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 29, 2008.

Case 2:06-cv-00463-JAM-EFB Document 39 Filed 05/29/08 Page 2 of 2