Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-02729/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-02729-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COBBLER NEVADA, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOE-68.8.213.203,

Defendant.

 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15-CV-2729-GPC (JMA)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

SECOND EX PARTE MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO ISSUE A FRCP

45 SUBPOENA AND

SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION

THEREON

[ECF Nos. 10, 11]

Before the Court is a Second Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Issue a

Subpoena pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, and a Supplemental Motion

thereon, filed by Plaintiff Cobbler Nevada, LLC (“Plaintiff”). (ECF Nos. 10,

11.) The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff file supplemental briefing

addressing the following:

1. The discrepancy between the document filed at ECF No. 10-3,

which reflects Plaintiff’s motion picture, The Cobbler, was associated with

BitTorrent activity at Defendant IP address 68.8.213.203 on thirteen (13)

occasions and the document filed as Exhibit 1 to Plaintiff’s Complaint (see

ECF No. 1-2), which reflects 107 instances of BitTorrent activity involving

The Cobbler at Defendant IP address.

15cv2729

Case 3:15-cv-02729-GPC-JMA Document 12 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to refer to motion

pictures, television programming, and other works not at issue in this

lawsuit in its communications with the subscriber of Defendant IP address

and/or the alleged infringer of the only copyrighted work at issue in this

litigation, The Cobbler.

3. Plaintiff’s supplemental brief, not exceeding five (5) pages, shall

be filed by no later than March 11, 2016. 

Additionally, the Clerk of Court shall terminate the motion docketed at

ECF No. 8, which was withdrawn by Plaintiff (see ECF No. 9), and the

document filed at ECF No. 9, which was erroneously filed as a motion by

Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 3, 2016

Jan M. Adler

U.S. Magistrate Judge

2 15cv2729

Case 3:15-cv-02729-GPC-JMA Document 12 Filed 03/03/16 Page 2 of 2