Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00281/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00281-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH GOMEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W COLVIN,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-00281-MEJ 

ORDER RE: STATEMENTS OF FACTS

As set forth in the Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions (Dkt. No. 8), this 

matter will be deemed submitted for decision without oral argument based on the parties’ motions 

for summary judgment and/or remand. In connection with their motions, the parties shall file

either a joint statement or separate statements of facts setting forth all relevant medical evidence 

and written and oral testimony in the Administrative Record. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS 

the parties to meet and confer within 21 days of service of Defendant’s answer for the purpose of 

determining whether they are able to file a joint statement of facts in the record, or whether it is 

necessary for the parties to file separate statements of facts.

A. Joint Statement of Facts

If the parties are able to agree on a joint statement of facts, the statement shall be signed by 

both parties and filed by the same deadline as Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment or for 

remand. Each fact must be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and cite to a specific 

portion of the Administrative Record where the fact finds support. 

B. Separate Statements of Facts

If the parties are unable to agree on a joint statement of facts, they shall comply with the 

following requirements for separate statements of facts.

1. Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of Facts 

At the time Plaintiff files the motion for summary judgment or for remand, Plaintiff must 

also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting forth each fact 

Case 3:15-cv-00281-MEJ Document 9 Filed 02/04/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

from the Administrative Record on which Plaintiff relies in support of the motion, including all 

relevant medical evidence and written and oral testimony in the Administrative Record. Each fact 

must be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the 

Administrative Record where the fact finds support. A failure to submit a separate statement of 

facts in this form may constitute grounds for denial of the motion.

2. Defendant’s Statement of Facts 

At the time Defendant files the cross-motion for summary judgment or for remand, 

Defendant must also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting 

forth: (a) for each paragraph of Plaintiff’s separate statement of facts, a correspondingly numbered 

paragraph indicating whether Defendant disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Plaintiff and, 

if disputed, a reference to the specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting 

Defendant’s position; and (b) any additional facts from the Administrative Record on which 

Defendant relies in support of the motion. Each additional fact must be set forth in a separately 

numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where the fact 

finds support.

3. Reply Statement of Facts 

If Defendant sets forth additional facts in the cross-motion, Plaintiff shall file a statement, 

separate from the reply brief, with correspondingly numbered paragraphs indicating whether 

Plaintiff disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Defendant and, if disputed, a reference to the 

specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting Plaintiff’s position. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2015

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00281-MEJ Document 9 Filed 02/04/15 Page 2 of 2