Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00242/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00242-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 625
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

1933 FORD COUPE

ROADSTER, et al., 

 Defendant(s).

___________________________/

No. C 05-0242 WDB

 

ORDER FOLLOWING 

MAY 11, 2006, FURTHER CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

On May 11, 2006, the Court held a Further Case Management Conference in

the above-referenced case. For reasons articulated more thoroughly on the record,

the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. Given the posture of the case and of related investigations, the Court has

decided to put this matter over for an additional three months. Accordingly, on

August 3, 2006, at 4:00 p.m., the parties must appear for a further Case Management

Conference by phone. Plaintiff must initiate the call, get all parties on the line, then

call the Court at 510-637-3326. In addition, by August 1, 2006 at noon, the parties

must file individual statements or, if possible, a joint statement, updating the Court

on the status of any matters that may be relevant for the Court to assess in deciding

whether to open discovery and to set a date for trial. 

Case 4:05-cv-00242-WDB Document 47 Filed 05/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. By June 28, 2006, Defendant's counsel must e-file one of the following:

(a) a substituted Answer for the Answer currently on file (which asserts only that

Defendant invokes his rights under the Fifth Amendment); or (b) A statement that

Defendant's counsel has reached agreement with Ms. Hinds, counsel for the United

States, that Defendant does not need to file a substituted Answer; or (c) A motion

seeking relief from filing a substituted Answer, should Defendant believe appropriate

grounds exist for such a motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Wayne D. Brazil

Dated: May 12, 2006 

WAYNE D. BRAZIL

United States Magistrate Judge

Copies to:

Parties, WDB, Stats.

Case 4:05-cv-00242-WDB Document 47 Filed 05/12/06 Page 2 of 2