Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05133/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05133-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RHODES TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

Case No. CV-09-5133 JF 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DAVID R. BURTT, State Bar No. 201220 

 dburtt@ongaroburtt.com ONGARO BURTT LLP 

595 Market Street, Suite 610 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 433-3900 

Facsimile: (415) 433-3950 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TIM RHODES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

QUALITY TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 

HOLDING, LLC, a Delaware Limited 

Liability Company, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHRISTIAN KOCH, an individual, DAVID 

BUCIAK, an individual, DATAPIPE, INC., a 

California Corporation, TIM RHODES, an 

individual, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. CV-09-5133 JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT TIM RHODES TO 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT 

WHEREAS on October 29, 2009, Plaintiff Quality Technology Services Holding, LLC 

filed its Complaint in the above-captioned matter; 

WHEREAS on November 18, 2009, Plaintiff filed its Certificate of Service of Summons, 

Complaint & Other Pleadings on Defendant Tim Rhodes; 

WHEREAS Plaintiff and Rhodes hereby stipulate and agree to extend the date of 

Rhodes’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint until March 5, 2010; 

-------------------

Case 5:09-cv-05133-JF Document 38 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 3
- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDERTO EXTEND TIME FOR RHODES TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

Case No. CV-09-5133 JF 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff and Rhodes acknowledge and 

agree that the new response date will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed 

by Court order in this case; 

NOW THEREFORE Plaintiff and Rhodes, by and through their respective counsel, 

hereby stipulate and inform the Court that the date of Rhodes’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint 

is extended to March 5, 2010. 

 

DATED: January 15, 2010 ONGARO BURTT LLP 

By: /s/ David R. Burtt 

 David R. Burtt 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TIM RHODES 

DATED: January 15, 2010 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 

By: /s/ Amber Rye Brumfiel 

Amber Rye Brumfiel 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

QUALITY TECHNOLOGY SERVICES HOLDING, LLC 

 

Case 5:09-cv-05133-JF Document 38 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 3
- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDERTO EXTEND TIME FOR RHODES TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

Case No. CV-09-5133 JF 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FILER’S ATTESTATION

 Pursuant to General Order 45, section X(B), I hereby attest that on January 15, 

2010, I, David R. Burtt, received the concurrence of Amber Brumfiel in the filing of this 

document. 

 /s/ David R. Burtt 

 David R. Burtt 

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January ___, 2010 

By: 

 Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

 United States District Judge 

19

Case 5:09-cv-05133-JF Document 38 Filed 01/27/10 Page 3 of 3