Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02333/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02333-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Service of this complaint has been deemed appropriate for defendant Spaulding, 1

who filed an answer on July 2, 2004.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AHMED KADIL, No. CIV S-03-2333-MCE-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, JR.,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 29, 2005, the court granted plaintiff leave to file an amended

complaint within 30 days to allege a constitutional violation as against defendant Alameida.1

Plaintiff was advised that, if he chose not to file an amended complaint, the court would

recommend dismissal of defendant Alameida for failure to state a claim and that this action

would proceed as against defendant Spaulding only. Plaintiff has not filed an amended

complaint.

Case 2:03-cv-02333-MCE -CMK Document 28 Filed 01/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Based on the foregoing, and for the substantive reasons outlined in the court’s

March 24, 2004, order, the undersigned recommends that defendant Alameida be dismissed and

that this action proceed as against defendant Spaulding only. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive

the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 9, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-02333-MCE -CMK Document 28 Filed 01/09/06 Page 2 of 2