Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01933/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01933-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRIS DOOP,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WOODFORD, et al., 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:14cv01933 DLB PC

ORDERTO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 

FAILURE TO FOLLOW A COURT ORDER 

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE 

Plaintiff Chris Doop (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff commenced this action by writing a letter to 

the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on October 10, 2014. He 

filed his complaint on October 24, 2014. On January 5, 2015, Plaintiff filed a First Amended 

Complaint (“FAC”) as a matter of right.1

On May 14, 2015, the Court screened Plaintiff’s FAC and dismissed it with leave to 

amend. Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days. Over thirty 

(30) days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 

communicated with the Court.

 

1

Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on December 12, 2014.

Case 1:14-cv-01933-DLB Document 17 Filed 07/06/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be 

dismissed for failure to follow a Court order and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff SHALL file a 

response to this order within twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of this order. Plaintiff 

may also comply with this order by filing an amended complaint.

Failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2015 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01933-DLB Document 17 Filed 07/06/15 Page 2 of 2