Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01002/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01002-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

-1-

JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF 

PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PHDATA 3313679_1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL M. CARLSON (CSBN 88048)

E-Mail: MCarlson@Schnader.com

SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP

One Montgomery Street, Suite 2200

San Francisco, California 94104-5501

Telephone: 415-364-6700

Facsimile: 415-364-6785

Attorneys for Plaintiff

REFLEX PACKAGING, INC.

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

RUSSELL B. HILL, Cal. Bar No. 190070

MARK L. BLAKE, Cal. Bar No. 253511

650 Town Center Drive, 4th Floor

Costa Mesa, California 92626-1993

Telephone: 714-513-5100

Facsimile: 714-513-5130

rhill@sheppardmullin.com

mblake@sheppardmullin.com

Attorneys for Defendant

LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REFLEX PACKAGING, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.

Defendant.

Case No. 5:10-cv-01002-JW

JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION 

OF PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Hon. James Ware

[Complaint Filed: March 9, 2010]

Case 5:10-cv-01002-EJD Document 24 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 3
-2-

JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF 

PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PHDATA 3313679_1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, 

JOINTLY REQUEST THE FOLLOWING: 

A modification of certain deadlines set in the Patent Scheduling Order, dated June 3, 

2010. 

I. BACKGROUND

This request is made to accommodate pre-planned vacations of counsel of record for the 

parties. These plans existed before the Patent Scheduling Order was entered on June 3. 2010. The 

deadlines in the Order were set without an appearance by counsel. The changes proposed below 

do not affect any court hearing dates set in the Patent Scheduling Order. 

II. PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE CASE SCHDULE

The parties propose modifying the case schedule as follows; all other provisions of the 

Patent Scheduling Order would remain unchanged: 

Current date Proposed date Event

07/16/2010 07/30/2010 Lenovo’s Invalidity Contentions due (Patent L.R. 3-3)

07/26/2010 08/02/2010 Each party to serve Proposed Terms and Claim 

Elements for Construction. (Patent L.R. 4-1; 

Scheduling Order ¶ 4.)

08/16/2010 08/30/2010 Parties to simultaneously exchange Preliminary Claim

Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence. (Patent L.R. 4-

2; Scheduling Order ¶ 5.)

09/17/2010 09/24/2010 Parties to file Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing 

Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3; Scheduling Order at page 

1, lines 26-27.) ).

10/22/2010 No change Close of Claim Construction Discovery (Patent L.R. 4-

4)

10/22/2010 No change Joint Case Management Statement for Interim Case 

Management Conference

11/1/2010 No change Interim Case Management Conference

Case 5:10-cv-01002-EJD Document 24 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 3
-3-

JOINT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF 

PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PHDATA 3313679_1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

02/04/2011 at 

9 am

No change Case Tutorial & Claim Construction Hearing

IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: July 16, 2010 SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP

By: /s/ Michael M. Carlson

MICHAEL M. CARLSON

Attorneys for Plaintiff

REFLEX PACKAGING, INC.

Dated: July 16, 2010 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

By: /s/ Russell B. Hill

RUSSELL B. HILL

Attorneys for Defendant

LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: _______________________

Hon. James Ware

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

July 22, 2010 

Case 5:10-cv-01002-EJD Document 24 Filed 07/22/10 Page 3 of 3