Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02496/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02496-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RENEE’ L. MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE

ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA NEVADA AND UTAH, et

al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-2496-TLN-EFB PS

ORDER

On June 15, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 15, 2016, are ADOPTED; 

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 6) is granted as follows: 

a. Plaintiff’s claims for breach of contract, violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and 

intentional infliction of emotional distress are dismissed with leave to amend. 

Case 2:15-cv-02496-TLN-EFB Document 20 Filed 07/22/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

b. Plaintiff’s claims for violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1982, 1983, 28 U.S.C. § 1343, 

and punitive damages are dismissed without leave to amend. 

3. As Plaintiff filed her amended complaint on July 15, 2016, the portion of the 

magistrate judge’s recommendation that Plaintiff be granted thirty days to file an 

amended complaint is not adopted as moot.

Dated: July 22, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-02496-TLN-EFB Document 20 Filed 07/22/16 Page 2 of 2