Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06994/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06994-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 450
Nature of Suit: Interstate Commerce
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOTAN CORP., a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

BAP LOGISTICS, a California corporation,

BARRY A. PRATER, an individual, and

DOES 1–100, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-06994 WHA

ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL AND

VACATING HEARING

Plaintiff’s motion to compel is far too late to entertain under Local Rule 26-2, is

DENIED, and is taken off calendar. Good cause has not been shown to make an exception. 

Counsel should have anticipated the deadline and acted accordingly. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 10, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-06994-WHA Document 45 Filed 09/10/07 Page 1 of 1