Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02116/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02116-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 A court may take judicial notice of its own records in other cases. United States v.

Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119-20 (9th Cir. 1980).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY JERE SIMPSON, JR.,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-2116 FCD EFB P

vs.

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS,

Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28

U.S.C. § 2254. On October 9, 2007, petitioner submitted two identical applications for a writ of

habeas corpus.1

 They were given different case numbers. See Simpson v. County of Stanislaus,

Case No. 07-2107 LKK CMK P; Simpson v. County of Stanislaus, Case No. 07-2116 FCD EFB

P. Because the actions are duplicative, petitioner should proceed on the action with the lower

case number.

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

Case 2:07-cv-02116-FCD-EFB Document 4 Filed 10/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: October 25, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-02116-FCD-EFB Document 4 Filed 10/26/07 Page 2 of 2