Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04183/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04183-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELIZABETH LLOYD,

Plaintiff,

v.

VIPUL GUPTA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-04183-MEJ 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On February 2, 2016, Plaintiff Elizabeth Lloyd filed a Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment, with a noticed hearing date of March 31, 2016. Dkt. No. 33. However, Defendants

failed to file any opposition(s) pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7. Accordingly, the Court hereby 

VACATES the motion hearing and ORDERS Defendants to show cause why sanctions should not 

be imposed, including granting Plaintiff’s motion, for failure to comply with court deadlines. 

Defendants shall file declaration(s) in response by February 25, 2016. If responsive declaration(s) 

are filed, the Court shall either issue an order based on the declaration(s) or conduct a hearing on 

March 10, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San 

Francisco, California. Notice is hereby given to Defendants that the Court may grant Plaintiff’s 

motion without a hearing if no responsive declaration is filed. Thus, it is imperative that the Court 

receive a written response by the deadline above.

No chambers copies are required.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18, 2016

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-04183-MEJ Document 36 Filed 02/18/16 Page 1 of 1