Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00330/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00330-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODOLFO MOLINA, JR., )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

JEFF WRIGLEY, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:07-cv-00330-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 4)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On February 28, 2007, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241 in this Court.

On June 6, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendations recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed because

Petitioner’s claim did not allege grounds that would entitle him to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

(Doc. 4). This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. On

June 15, 2007, Petitioner filed his objections. (Doc. 5). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

Case 1:07-cv-00330-OWW -TAG Document 6 Filed 07/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner’s

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is

supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed June 6, 2007 (Doc. 4), are ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00330-OWW -TAG Document 6 Filed 07/26/07 Page 2 of 2