Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00611/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00611-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELVIN JOHN CABRERA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS M. MADDOCK, et al., 

 Defendants.

Case No. 1:10-cv-00611-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO 

FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS

(ECF No. 28)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 

rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Plainitff’s 

Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claim against Defendants Gentry, Sanchez, 

Sigsten, Buechner, Jakabusky, and Kingston. (ECF No. 23.)

On December 28, 2015, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a 

claim. (ECF No. 28.) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition

to Defendant’s motion, and the time for doing so has passed. Local Rule 230(l). The 

Court will give Plaintiff one further opportunity to respond to the motion: Plaintiff must 

file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss

within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file 

Case 1:10-cv-00611-LJO-MJS Document 31 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion, this action may be 

dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2016 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00611-LJO-MJS Document 31 Filed 02/12/16 Page 2 of 2