Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02333/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02333-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 362
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Orlonzo Hedrington, et al., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Veteran’s Administration of the United 

States of America, et al., 

Defendants. 

___________________________________ 

Orlonzo Hedrington, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

County of Solano, et al., 

Defendants. 

___________________________________ 

Orlonzo Hedrington, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Veteran’s Administration of the United 

States of America, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:18-cv-02333-KJM-DB 

ORDER 

No. 2:21-cv-00414-KJM-DB 

No: 1:22-cv-01425-KJM-DB 

Case 2:18-cv-02333-KJM-DB Document 88 Filed 05/31/24 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Orlonzo Hedrington, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

David Grant Medical Center, et al., 

Defendants. 

___________________________________ 

Orlonzo Hedrington, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

David Grant Medical Center, et al., 

Defendants. 

___________________________________ 

Orlonzo Hedrington, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

United States of America, 

Defendant. 

___________________________________ 

Orlonzo Hedrington, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

United States of America, et al., 

Defendant. 

No: 2:22-cv-00074-KJM-DB 

No: 2:23-cv-00801-TLN-CKD

No: 1:24-cv-00497-KES-SKO 

No: 2:24-cv-01224-DAD-DB 

The court has reviewed the notice of related cases in the above-captioned actions. All 

four cases that were before the undersigned are now closed. The assigned District Judge and 

Magistrate Judge in case no. 2:23-cv-00801-TLN-CKD have already resolved several pending 

Case 2:18-cv-02333-KJM-DB Document 88 Filed 05/31/24 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

motions and that case is also closed. Although all the actions involve the same parties and are 

based on similar claims, the court finds assignment of the actions to a single judge is not “likely 

to effect a savings of judicial effort or other economies” in this case. E.D. Cal. L.R. 123(c). The 

court therefore declines to relate the above-captioned actions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 30, 2024. 

Case 2:18-cv-02333-KJM-DB Document 88 Filed 05/31/24 Page 3 of 3