Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01807/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01807-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT “BOSTON” WOODARD, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JOHN W. HAVILAND, et al., 

Defendant. 

No. 2:11-cv-1807 LKK JFM (PC) 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On September 19, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within seven days. (ECF No. 52.) Plaintiff has 

filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 53.) 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis. 

///// 

Case 2:11-cv-01807-KJN Document 54 Filed 10/08/13 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 19, 2013 are ADOPTED in full, 

except that the magistrate judge may modify the relocation order on a showing by 

plaintiff’s counsel that a different location and/or amount of time is required to 

properly prepare for trial; and 

2. Plaintiff’s September 17, 2013 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 

49) and September 18, 2013 Request for Hearing on Application for Temporary 

Restraining Order (ECF No. 50) are DENIED. 

DATED: October 7, 2013. 

Case 2:11-cv-01807-KJN Document 54 Filed 10/08/13 Page 2 of 2