Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04479/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04479-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

Case No. 09-CV-04479-JSW STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DATE 

FOR REDCATS USA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

@Zcc^\Vc( :ZccZii $ <dgbVc aae 

aVlnZgh 

adh Vc\ZaZh( XVa^[dgc^V 

HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

Roderick G. Dorman (SBN 96908) 

dormanr@hbdlawyers.com 

Alan P. Block (SBN 143783) 

blocka@hbdlawyers.com 

Marc Morris (SBN 183728) 

morrism@hbdlawyers.com

865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2900 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (213) 694-1200 

Fax: (213) 694-1234 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

SPEEDTRACK, INC., 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SPEEDTRACK, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AMAZON.COM, INC.; COSTCO 

WHOLESALE CORPORATION; 1-800-

FLOWERS.COM, INC.; 

BARNESANDNOBLE.COM, LLC; 

BARNESANDNOBLE.COM, INC.; THE 

HOME DEPOT, INC.; NIKE, INC.; 

NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT 

CATALOG CO., INC.; J & R 

ELECTRONICS, INC.; DELL, INC.; BEST 

BUY CO.; BEST BUY.COM, LLC; 

SYSTEMAX, INC.; OFFICEMAX, INC.; 

MACY’S, INC.; MACYS.COM, INC.; 

OVERSTOCK.COM, INC.; 

RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT, INC.; 

VALUE VISION INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

DBA SHOPNBC.COM; B &H FOTO & 

ELECTRONICS CORP.; HEWLETTPACKARD COMPANY; REDCATS USA, 

INC.; RETAIL CONVERGENCE, INC., 

DBA SMARTBARGAINS.COM, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.09-CV-04479-JSW 

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT 

REDCATS USA, INC. TO ANSWER OR 

OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE 

COMPLAINT 

[CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2] 

JUDGE: Hon. Jeffrey S. White 

Case 4:09-cv-04479-JSW Document 83 Filed 11/30/09 Page 1 of 3 Case3:09-cv-04479-JSW Document62 Filed11/20/09 Page1 of 3
-1- 

Case No. 09-CV-04479-JSW STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DATE 

FOR REDCATS USA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

@Zcc^\Vc( :ZccZii $ <dgbVc aae 

aVlnZgh 

adh Vc\ZaZh( XVa^[dgc^V 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff SpeedTrack, Inc. (“SpeedTrack”) filed this action for infringement of 

SpeedTrack’s U.S. Patent No. 5,544,360 (“the ‘360 patent”) on September 23, 2009; 

WHEREAS, SpeedTrack has served its Complaint on Defendant Redcats USA, Inc. 

(“Redcats USA”) on October 2, 2009; 

WHEREAS, SpeedTrack and Redcats USA previously filed a stipulation under Local Rule 

6-1(A) on October 20, 2009 (Docket No. 28) agreeing to extend the time for Redcats USA to answer 

or otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint by 30 days to November 23, 2009; 

WHEREAS SpeedTrack and each Defendant to this action including Redcats USA have filed 

a Joint Stipulation on November 16, 2009 asking the Court to stay this litigation until such time as 

both (i) the reexamination of the ‘360 patent is resolved and (ii) judgment in the Wal-Mart Action or 

an order dismissing the Wal-Mart Action is entered (Docket No. 48); 

WHEREAS, the Court has not yet acted on the parties’ Joint Stipulation to stay; 

WHEREAS, the resolution of both the reexamination of the ‘360 patent and Wal-Mart 

Action may substantially narrow the issues involved in this action; 

WHEREAS, Redcats USA has requested an extension of time to respond to SpeedTrack’s 

Complaint until at least 21 days after the date of the Court’s Order lifting any stay that may be 

granted in this action, without prejudice to Redcats USA seeking further extensions as appropriate; 

WHEREAS, Redcats USA’s request for an extension is not made for the purpose of delay; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through 

their respective counsel of record, THAT: 

The date by which Redcats USA must answer or otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s 

Complaint shall be extended as follows: If the Court grants a stay of this litigation pursuant to the 

parties’ Joint Stipulation or otherwise, then Redcats USA shall have 21 days to answer or otherwise 

respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint from the date of the Court’s order lifting the stay, without 

prejudice to Redcats USA seeking further extensions as appropriate. If the Court denies the parties’ 

request to stay, then Redcats USA shall have 21 days to answer or otherwise respond from the date 

of the Court’s order, without prejudice to Redcats USA seeking further extensions as appropriate. 

Case 4:09-cv-04479-JSW Document 83 Filed 11/30/09 Page 2 of 3 Case3:09-cv-04479-JSW Document62 Filed11/20/09 Page2 of 3
-2- 

Case No. 09-CV-04479-JSW STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DATE 

FOR REDCATS USA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

@Zcc^\Vc( :ZccZii $ <dgbVc aae 

aVlnZgh 

adh Vc\ZaZh( XVa^[dgc^V 

SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: November 20, 2009 HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

By /s/ Alan P. Block 

Roderick G. Dorman 

Alan P. Block 

Marc Morris 

Omer Salik 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

SPEEDTRACK, INC., 

DATED: November 20, 2009 TURNER BOYD LLP 

By /s/ Karen Boyd 

Karen Boyd 

Attorney for Defendant, 

REDCATS USA, INC. 

[Proposed] Order

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

The date by which Redcats must answer or otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint 

shall be extended as follows: If the Court grants a stay of this litigation pursuant to the parties’ Joint 

Stipulation or otherwise, then Redcats USA shall have 21 days to answer or otherwise respond to 

SpeedTrack’s Complaint from the date of the Court’s order lifting the stay, without prejudice to 

Redcats seeking further extensions as appropriate. If the Court denies the parties’ request to stay, 

then Redcats USA shall have 21 days to answer or otherwise respond from the date of the Court’s 

order, without prejudice to Redcats USA seeking further extensions as appropriate. 

DATED: 

By

Hon. Jeffrey S. White 

United States District Judge 

Case3:09-cv-04479-JSW Document62 Filed11/20/09 Page3 of 3

November 30, 2009

Case 4:09-cv-04479-JSW Document 83 Filed 11/30/09 Page 3 of 3