Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00029/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00029-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLORIA SALTER,

NO. CIV. S-04-29 LKK/DAD

Plaintiffs,

v. O R D E R

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI; and

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN’S 

AFFAIRS,

Defendants.

 /

A hearing in the above-captioned case was scheduled for July

18, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., on the Law and Motion Calendar of this

court pursuant to defendant’s motion for summary judgment or

summary adjudication. 

Counsel for plaintiff has filed an opposition brief. Local

Rule 56-260(b) for the Eastern District of California specifies

that any party opposing a motion for summary judgment or summary

adjudication “shall reproduce the itemized facts in the Statement

of Undisputed Facts and admit those facts that are undisputed and

Case 2:04-cv-00029-LKK -DAD Document 24 Filed 06/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 The court notes that it has already been forced to continue 1

one hearing date because of plaintiff’s counsel’s failure to file

a timely opposition in accordance with Local Rule 78-230.

Plaintiff’s counsel is admonished that failure to comply with Local

Rule 56-260(b) by the specified date may result in further

sanctions.

2

deny those that are disputed, including with each denial a citation

to the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit, deposition,

interrogatory answer, admission or other document relied upon in

support of that denial.” Plaintiff’s counsel has failed to

reproduce the Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit those that

are undisputed and deny those that are disputed (otherwise known

as a “Response SUF”). 

Accordingly, plaintiff’s counsel is ORDERED to file a Response

SUF which complies with Local Rule 56-260(b) by 4:00 p.m. on

Thursday, June 30, 2005.1

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 28, 2005.

Case 2:04-cv-00029-LKK -DAD Document 24 Filed 06/29/05 Page 2 of 2