Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02488/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02488-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1137P204 -1-

STIPULATION AND ORDER (05-02488 EDL)

PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)

P. BOBBY SHUKLA, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 229736)

PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

1617 Clay Street

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-0292

Facsimile: (510) 452-5625

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JORITA ADANANDUS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JORITA ADANANDUS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SAFWAY SCAFFOLDING COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. 05-02488 EDL

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15(a), the parties to the above-entitled

action stipulate to the following:

1. Plaintiff may file and serve a Second Amended Complaint with the Court

on October 13, 2005.

2. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading to the Plaintiff’s Second

Amended Complaint on or before October 19, 2005.

3. All deadlines previously set by the Court will remain intact. The parties

have met the first deadlines set by the Court by submitting a Stipulation and Proposed Order

Selecting ADR Process on September 27, 2005. Plaintiff served initial disclosures on October

Case 3:05-cv-02488-EDL Document 12 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1137P204 -2-

STIPULATION AND ORDER (05-02488 EDL)

11, 2005. Defendants will serve initial disclosures shortly after filing their responsive pleading.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: October 13, 2005 PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

___/s/ P. Bobby Shukla__________________

P. BOBBY SHUKLA, Attorneys for Plaintiff

JORITA ADANANDUS

Dated: October 13, 2005 JACKSON LEWIS, LLP

____/s/ Scott Oborne___________________

SCOTT OBORNE, Attorneys for Defendants

SAFWAY SCAFFOLDING COMPANY,

OSIA LNU, and EDWIN ASCENIO

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff may file and serve a Second Amended Complaint with the Court

on October 13, 2005.

2. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Second

Amended Complaint on or before October 19, 2005.

3. All deadlines previously set by the Court will remain intact. 

Dated: _________________ _____________________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

October 24, 2005 U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:05-cv-02488-EDL Document 12 Filed 10/24/05 Page 2 of 2