Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03665/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03665-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHANIE BABA, O.D.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Secretary,

Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendant.

 /

No. C-04-3665 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT

TO COMPLY WITH GENERAL

ORDER 53

The above-titled action was reassigned to the undersigned on April 5, 2005. On the

preceding day, April 4, 2005, defendant lodged the administrative record with the Court,

accompanied by a cover sheet which states: “Pursuant to General Order 53, the attached

document is filed under seal.”

Defendant has not complied with the requirements of General Order 53. General

Order 53 generally precludes parties from filing documents that contain social security

numbers, names of minor children, dates of birth, and financial account numbers. See

Gen. Order 53(A). It also provides, however, that a party wishing to file a document

containing such information “may file an unredacted document under seal by following the

procedures prescribed in Civil L.R. 79-5.” See Gen. Order 53(B). The party also “must file

a redacted copy for the public file.” See id.

Case 3:04-cv-03665-MMC Document 9 Filed 04/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

To comply with Civil L.R. 79-5, a party must file an administrative motion to file under

seal, accompanied by a declaration establishing that the entire document is sealable. See

Civil L.R. 79-5(b). Defendant has not done so. Moreover, defendant has not filed a

redacted copy of the administrative record, as further required by General Order 53.

Accordingly, defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 53 by

filing, no later than April 21, 2005, an administrative motion to file the administrative record

under seal, pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5, and a redacted copy of the administrative record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 7, 2005 

/s/ Maxine M. Chesney 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03665-MMC Document 9 Filed 04/20/05 Page 2 of 2