Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-3_06-cv-00082/USCOURTS-ared-3_06-cv-00082-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:206 Social Security Benefits

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

JONESBORO DIVISION

JAMES M. MULLINS PLAINTIFF

V. NO. 3:06cv00082JWC 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner, Social 

Security Administration DEFENDANT

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a motion for attorney's fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal

Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (doc. 19). He seeks an EAJA award for

work done at the district court level by his attorney (12.8 hours in 2006 at an hourly rate of

$162.00 and 1.1 hours in 2007 at an hourly rate of $167.00), and by paralegal assistants

(4 hours at an hourly rate of $75.00), for a total fee award of $2,557.30. Additionally, he

seeks reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $13.95. 

Under the EAJA, a prevailing social security claimant is entitled to an award of

reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses unless the Commissioner’s position in denying

benefits was “substantially justified” or special circumstances make an award unjust. 28

U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). A claimant who wins a sentence-four remand order, such as

Plaintiff did in this case (doc. 17, 18), is a prevailing party entitled to EAJA fees. Shalala

v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302 (1993). The Commissioner does not contest Plaintiff’s

entitlement to an award of fees and expenses under the EAJA, nor does he object to the

amount requested (doc. 21, 22). 

The EAJA provides that attorney fees "shall not be awarded in excess of $125.00

per hour unless the court determines that an increase in the cost of living or a special

Case 3:06-cv-00082-JWC Document 23 Filed 04/11/08 Page 1 of 3
2

factor, such as the limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved,

justifies a higher fee." 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A)(ii). See Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S.

552, 571 (1988). The increased rates requested by Plaintiff reflect an agreement between

Plaintiff’s counsel and the Office of General Counsel, Region VI, Social Security

Administration, to calculate attorney’s fees on an annualized basis using the mid-year

Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) (doc. 20-2, at 1-2). Plaintiff

submits the applicable CPI-U figures to support the increased rates (doc. 20-2, at 11). 

Paralegals are to be compensated at the market rate. Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S.

274, 289 (1989). Counsel submits affidavits to establish $75.00 an hour as the prevailing

market rate for paralegal work (doc. 20-2, at 8-10). 

No objection is made to the number of attorney or paralegal hours requested or to

the amount of expenses, and counsel’s itemization establishes that they were reasonably

expended in representation of Plaintiff (doc. 20-2, at 12-14). 

Therefore, the Court will approve the total requested fees for attorney work (12.8

hours at an hourly rate of $162.00 and 1.1 hours at an hourly rate of $167.00) and

paralegal work (4 hours at an hourly rate of $75.00), for a fee award of $2,557.30. The

Court will also approve the requested expenses of $13.95. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED 

(1) That Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal

Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (doc. 19) is granted; 

(2) That Plaintiff's attorney is entitled to an attorney's fee in the amount of

$2,557.30, together with expenses of $13.95, for a total of $2,571.25, all pursuant to the

EAJA; and

Case 3:06-cv-00082-JWC Document 23 Filed 04/11/08 Page 2 of 3
3

(3) That the Commissioner is directed to certify and pay to Anthony Bartels,

attorney for Plaintiff, the amount awarded pursuant to the EAJA. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2008.

 

 

 _________________________________

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00082-JWC Document 23 Filed 04/11/08 Page 3 of 3