Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04187/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04187-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:07-cv-04187-JCS

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

NED N. ISOKAWA (SB# 66287)

nedisokawa@paulhastings.com

JASON K. SONODA (SB# 248105)

jasonsonoda@paulhasting.com

55 Second Street, Twenty-Fourth Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105-3441

Telephone: (415) 856-7000

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

THEORDORE STEVENSON, III (pro hac vice application to be filed)

tstevenson@mckoolsmith.com

SCOTT W. HEJNY (pro hac vice application to be filed)

shejny@mckooksmith.com

LUKE F. MCLEROY (pro hac vice application to be filed)

lmcleroy@mckoolsmith.com

300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500

Dallas, TX 75201

(214) 978-4000

(214) 978-4044 (fax)

www.mckoolsmith.com

Attorneys for Defendant

i2 Technologies, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, A 

German corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

i2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 3:07-cv-04187-JCS

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff SAP Aktiengesellschaft (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant i2 Technologies, Inc.

(“Defendant”) through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

Case 3:07-cv-04187-JCS Document 12 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 4:07-cv-04187-SBA Document 14 Filed 10/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:07-cv-04187-JCS

-2-

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, the date by which Defendant must respond to the First Amended 

Complaint is currently October 1, 2007; and

WHEREAS, Defendant has requested additional time to consider the allegations 

raised in the First Amended Complaint; 

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) the parties hereby stipulate that 

the date by which Defendant must file and serve a response to the First Amended Complaint be 

continued by fourteen (14) days, up to and including October 15, 2007. 

DATED: September 28, 2007 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

NED N. ISOKAWA

By: /s/ Ned N. Isokawa

Ned N. Isokawa

Attorneys for Defendant

i2 Technologies

DATED: September 28, 2007 FENWICK & WEST LLP

MICHAEL J. SACKSTEDER

By: /s/ Michael J. Sacksteder

Michael J. Sacksteder

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SAP Aktiengesellschaft

LEGAL_US_W # 57189203.1

Case 3:07-cv-04187-JCS Document 12 Filed 09/28/2007 Page 2 of 2

Dated: October 1, 2007 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 4:07-cv-04187-SBA Document 14 Filed 10/02/07 Page 2 of 2