Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-00498/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-00498-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

---

1

3:18-cv-00498-H-JLB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAIME REYES,

Plaintiff,

v.

SNOOZETOWN, LLC doing business as 

SNOOZE AN A.M. EATERY also known 

as SNOOZE DEL MAR; DEL MAR 

HIGHLANDS TOWN CENTER 

ASSOCIATES II, LLC; and DOES 1-10, 

Inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:18-cv-00498-H-JLB

ORDER:

(1) DENYING AS MOOT 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS

[Doc. No. 7]

(2) VACATING MOTION HEARING 

DATE

On March 7, 2018, Plaintiff Jaime Reyes (“Plaintiff”), represented by counsel, filed 

a complaint against Defendant Snoozetown, LLC doing business as Snooze an A.M. Eatery

also known as Snooze Del Mar, and Defendant Del Mar Highlands Town Center 

Associates II, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Americans with 

Disabilities Act and California state law. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff also filed a motion for 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, which the Court granted on March 12, 2018. (Doc. 

Nos. 2, 4.)

Case 3:18-cv-00498-H-JLB Document 13 Filed 05/17/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

3:18-cv-00498-H-JLB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On May 3, 2018, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, which is set for a hearing on 

June 11, 2018. (Doc. No. 7.) Rather than oppose Defendants’ motion, Plaintiff filed an

amended Complaint on May 16, 2018. (Doc. No. 7.) See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B)

(permitting plaintiffs to file an amended complaint as a matter of right within “21 days 

after the service of a motion under Rule 12(b)”).

Because Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint supersedes his original complaint, the 

Court DENIES AS MOOT Defendants’ motion to dismiss the original complaint. See

Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). The Court 

directs the Clerk to VACATE the hearing on Defendants’ motion, currently scheduled for 

June 11, 2018. Defendants shall file any response to the Amended Complaint on or before 

May 30, 2018. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 17, 2018

 

MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:18-cv-00498-H-JLB Document 13 Filed 05/17/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2