Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00487/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00487-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOBBY GLOSS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

)

D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

CV F 05 0487 OWW LJO HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

[Doc. #12]

ORDER DISMISSING GROUND ONE

FROM THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS

[Doc. #1]

ORDER REFERRING MATTER BACK TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On June 17, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that

recommended Ground One of the petition be DISMISSED. The Findings and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days

of the date of service of the order. 

On July 25, 2005, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file and having considered the

Case 1:05-cv-00487-OWW -JMD Document 14 Filed 08/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 2

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is

supported by the record and proper analysis, and there is no need to modify the Findings and

Recommendations based on the points raised in the objections.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued June 17, 2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Ground One of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED; and

3. The matter is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 11, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00487-OWW -JMD Document 14 Filed 08/12/05 Page 2 of 2