Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00186/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00186-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE L. MURPHY, SR., )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

D.L. RUNNELS, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:05-cv-00186-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 16)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 8)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On February 22, 2005, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241 in this Court. (Doc. 1). On June 14, 2005, Petitioner filed an amended petition. 

(Doc. 8). 

On August 25, 2006, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and that

the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED having been filed beyond the

one-year limitations period provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). (Doc. 16). This Report and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed

Case 1:05-cv-00186-AWI-TAG Document 17 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed August 25, 2006 (Doc. 16), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 12) is GRANTED;

32. This amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 8), is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00186-AWI-TAG Document 17 Filed 09/26/06 Page 2 of 2