Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01826/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01826-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNITS

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

 /

This Order Relates To:

ALL ACTIONS

 /

No. C 06-07417 WHA

MDL No. 1826

REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

With respect to the prejudice issue, each side should submit a memorandum (up to three

pages) listing caselaw holdings involving a prior antitrust dismissal and affirmance where

discovery was requested and denied, eventually followed by an indictment and guilty pleas,

leading to a new round of antitrust complaints. The specific point of interest would be whether

the new complaint was allowed (or not) to reach back earlier than the normal limitations period. 

Please file by MONDAY, JULY 16, 2007, AT NOON (plaintiffs should file a single memo). Please

give cases exactly on point or advise that there are none.

Defendants are also requested to provide citations to the decision or decisions in which

they found the five-factor test for entering a stay of discovery mentioned during oral argument. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 11, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-md-01826-WHA Document 148 Filed 07/11/07 Page 1 of 1