Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00150/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00150-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CEDRIC GREENE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NORTH KERN STATE PRISON,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00150-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS,

AND DISMISSING ACTION, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO

EXHAUST (Docs. 27 and 37)

Plaintiff Cedric Greene (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On October 25, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. 

On November 16, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:05-cv-00150-AWI -SMS Document 40 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis. The appeal that

Plaintiff claims exhausted his administrative remedies do not

properly grieve the retaliation claim at issue in this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 25,

2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion, filed

September 18, 2006, is GRANTED; and,

3. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on

plaintiff’s failure to exhaust the available administrative

remedies.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00150-AWI -SMS Document 40 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 2