Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05411/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05411-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 In his attempts to contact Tokarczyk, defense counsel was notified that the address

of record had been vacated and that the phoneline had been disconnected. Tokarczyk has not

responded to his emails. (Cimmarusti Declaration, Docket No. 75).

*E-filed 10/18/06* 

 

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MARIA VALENCIA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

BY THE BAY INVESTMENTS, INC., et al,

Defendants. /

No. C05-05411 HRL

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

SETTLEMENT

The court is informed that this action has settled. In light of this, all trial and pretrial

dates are VACATED. However, it appears that plaintiff's counsel, Gregory Tokarczyk, has

been delinquent in responding to defense counsel's attempts to finalize settlement.1

 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

• On or before November 6, 2007, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal

pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a). 

• If a dismissal is not filed by November 6, counsel for all parties (including

associated counsel, Richard Hamm) shall appear in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor of the

United States District Court, San Jose, CA on November 27, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.

and show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a). 

Case 5:05-cv-05411-HRL Document 76 Filed 10/18/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

• The parties shall file a statement (either jointly or separately) in response to this

Order to Show Cause no later than November 20, 2007. The statement shall

state (1) the status of the activities of the parties in finalizing settlement; and (2)

how much additional time, if any, is requested to finalize the settlement and file

the dismissal.

If a voluntary dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be

automatically vacated and the parties need not file a joint statement in response to this Order.

Dated: ________________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10/18/07

Case 5:05-cv-05411-HRL Document 76 Filed 10/18/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:05-cv-5411 Notice has been electronically mailed to: 

Patrick John Cimmarusti pjcimmar@yahoo.com 

Curtis Llloyd Metzgar ecwlg7@earthlink.net 

Gregory John Tokarczyk gtokarczyk@sbcglobal.net 

5:05-cv-5411 Notice has been delivered by other means to: 

Richard Hamm 

Law Offices of Richard Hamm

12 S. First Street

Suite 809

San Jose, CA 95113

* Counsel are responsible for providing copies of this order to co-counsel.

Date: 10/18/07 /s/ KRO 

 Chambers of Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd

Case 5:05-cv-05411-HRL Document 76 Filed 10/18/07 Page 3 of 3