Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES LATHROP, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-05678-JST 

MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL

Re: ECF No. 123

Plaintiff Julie McKinney and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. have filed a stipulation of 

dismissal dated February 2, 2016, stating that they stipulate to dismiss with prejudice all claims 

McKinney asserted in this action. ECF No. 123. Dismissal is effective without court order 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

All claims between Plaintiff McKinney and Defendant Uber have been dismissed with

prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate Plaintiff McKinney as a party in this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2016

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 125 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 1