Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-01669/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-01669-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KYREE BREEDLOVE,

Plaintiff,

v.

FIGUEROA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:18-cv-01669-DAD-BAM (PC)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(ECF No. 40)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Kyree Breedlove (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against 

Defendant Figueroa for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

On April 30, 2021, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that 

(1) Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as to his Eighth Amendment claim; and 

(2) Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Figueroa is barred by the favorable 

termination rule. (ECF No. 37.) In the motion, Plaintiff was provided with notice of the 

requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th 

Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 

409, 411–12 (9th Cir. 1988). (ECF No. 37-1.)

///

Case 1:18-cv-01669-JLT-BAM Document 41 Filed 08/02/21 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On June 8, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file his 

opposition to the summary judgment motion. (ECF No. 40.) Pursuant to that order and Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d), Plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition was due on or 

before July 12, 2021. The deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s motion for summary 

judgment has expired, and Plaintiff has not otherwise been in contact with the Court. Plaintiff 

will be permitted one final opportunity to show cause why this action should not be dismissed 

with prejudice.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause by WRITTEN 

RESPONSE within twenty-one (21) days of service of this order why this action should not be 

dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff may comply with the Court’s order 

by filing an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s April 30, 2021 motion for 

summary judgment. Plaintiff is warned that if he fails to comply with the Court’s order, this 

matter will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 2, 2021 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:18-cv-01669-JLT-BAM Document 41 Filed 08/02/21 Page 2 of 2