Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_11-cv-00693/USCOURTS-azd-4_11-cv-00693-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

David A. Lipinski, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Carolyn W. Colvin, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-693-TUC-RCC (JR)

ORDER

Plaintiff David A. Lipinski filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the

Social Security Act for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the

Social Security Administration, denying his application for disability insurance benefits. 

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau for

all pretrial proceedings and report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions

of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LRCiv 72.1 and LRCiv 72.2, Rules of Practice of the United

States District Court for the District of Arizona. 

On March 7, 2013, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau issued her Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 17), recommending that the District Court, after its independent

review of the record herein, remand this matter to the Administrative Law Judge to consider

and further evaluate the medical records and lay witness testimony. 

The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that they may file written

objections within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and

Case 4:11-cv-00693-RCC Document 18 Filed 03/27/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. No objections were filed.

The Court considers the Report and Recommendation to be thorough and wellreasoned. After a thorough and de novo review of the record, the Court will ADOPT the

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Rateau. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 17) is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact

and conclusions of law by this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claim for benefits is REMANDED to

the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings in accordance with the Report and

Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment be entered accordingly.

DATED this 27th day of March, 2013.

Case 4:11-cv-00693-RCC Document 18 Filed 03/27/13 Page 2 of 2