Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02151/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02151-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2729

Attorneys for Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AHMED SHADKAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland

Security, et al.

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 07-S-CV-2151 LKK JFM

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER

This is an immigration case in which plaintiff has filed to challenge U.S. Citizenship and

Immigration Services’ (CIS) failure to timely adjudicate his application to adjust status to that of

lawful permanent resident. At the time of this filing, the Federal Bureau of Investigations’ (FBI)

background name check is complete, but a further interview is required to determine eligibility

to adjust status. CIS is in the process of scheduling that interview; once the interview is

completed, the agency will complete the adjudication of the application. Toward the end of

resolving the matter at the agency level, the parties therefore stipulate to a 60-day extension of

time for the filing of the government’s answer. 

The parties stipulate that the time for filing the government’s answer be extended to March 3,

2008, and that the scheduling conference, currently set for January 7, 2008, be reset to sometime

after the new answer due date.

Case 2:07-cv-02151-LKK -JFM Document 8 Filed 01/03/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

 

Dated: January 2, 2008

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/Audrey Hemesath

Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

By: /s/ Dina Marie Sokhn

Dina Marie Sokhn

Attorney for the Plaintiff

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the defendants’ Answer is due on March 3, 2008, and that the scheduling

conference is reset to March 31, 2008 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 3, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02151-LKK -JFM Document 8 Filed 01/03/08 Page 2 of 2