Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02232/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02232-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO ANGUIANO,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

RICHLEN CONSTRUCTION,

Defendant. /

No. C06-02232 MJJ

[AMENDED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On September 6, 2006, the Defendant United States filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #37), and

noticed the Motion for hearing on October 17, 2006. Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7-3, any

opposition or notice of non-opposition to a motion must be served and filed no less than 21 days before

the hearing date. To date, Plaintiff has failed to file any response to Defendant’s Motion. Accordingly,

the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause as to why he failed to file a timely opposition or notice of nonopposition and why the Court should consider any late-filed opposition. Plaintiff shall file his response

to this Order, along with any opposition, by 5:00 p.m., October 3, 2006. Plaintiff’s failure to response

to this Order may result in imposition of sanctions, including the granting of Defendant’s Motion.

Defendant may file a reply one week after Plaintiff files his response to this Order and his opposition,

if any. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 10/2/2006 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-02232-MJJ Document 46 Filed 10/02/06 Page 1 of 1