Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00531/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00531-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADRIENNE HENNING, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0531 FCD KJM PS

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On November 17, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections

to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 17, 2006, are adopted in

full;

Case 2:05-cv-00531-FCD-KJM Document 37 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The motion for summary judgment of defendants Sacramento County and

Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department is granted; and

3. The motion for summary judgment of the individual defendants is denied.

DATED: January 19, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-00531-FCD-KJM Document 37 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 2