Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02150/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02150-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud

---

JOINT STIPULATION TO ADJUST CLASS CERTIFICATION 

OPPOSITION AND REPLY DEADLINES 

Civil Case No.: 3:15-cv-02150-RS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EMILY JOHNSON HENN (SBN 269482) 

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 

Redwood Shores, CA 94061 

Telephone: 650-632-4700 

Facsimile: 650-632-4800 

Email: ehenn@cov.com 

SONYA D. WINNER (SBN 200348) 

CORTLIN H. LANNIN (SBN 266488) 

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

One Front Street, 35th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Telephone: 415-591-6000 

Facsimile: 415-591-6091 

Email: swinner@cov.com 

Email: clannin@cov.com 

Attorneys for Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JAMIE PETTIT, an individual, on behalf of 

himself, the general public, and those 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY; AND 

DOES 1 THROUGH 50, 

 Defendants. 

Civil Case No.: 3:15-cv-02150-RS 

JOINT STIPULATION TO 

ADJUST CLASS 

CERTIFICATION OPPOSITION 

AND REPLY DEADLINES

ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-02150-RS Document 64 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION TO ADJUST CLASS CERTIFICATION 

OPPOSITION AND REPLY DEADLINES 

Civil Case No.: 3:15-cv-02150-RS 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, plaintiff Jamie Pettit and defendant The 

Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) respectfully submit this joint stipulation to adjust the opposition 

and reply deadlines related to plaintiff’s motion for class certification. 

WHEREAS, at the August 13, 2015 Case Management Conference and in a subsequent 

order, this Court set an initial briefing schedule for plaintiff’s motion for class certification (see Dkt. No. 

24);

WHEREAS, the parties filed joint stipulations on four subsequent occasions to extend the 

schedule for class certification, each of which was entered by the Court (see Dkt. Nos. 27, 29, 31 and 

41);

WHEREAS, the last such stipulation (see Dkt. No. 41) was entered on August 29, 2016 

and provided that plaintiff would file her motion for class certification by February 14, 2017; P&G 

would file its opposition by March 28, 2017; plaintiff would file her reply by April 25, 2017; and the 

hearing would be held at 1:30 p.m. on May 18, 2017. 

WHEREAS, plaintiff timely filed her motion for class certification on February 14, 2017; 

WHEREAS, to accommodate the parties’ agreed-upon schedule to depose various 

individuals, including the named plaintiff and the parties’ class certification experts, and for P&G to 

provide certain supplemental discovery on which the parties have agreed, the parties propose to add 

three days to both the opposition and reply periods, but leave unchanged the hearing date.

NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES BY COUNSEL HEREBY STIPULATE as follows: 

P&G shall provide certain agreed-upon supplemental discovery to plaintiff by March 17, 

2017; P&G shall file its opposition to plaintiff’s motion for class certification by March 31, 2017; P&G 

shall make available for deposition the week of April 17 any experts whose declarations are submitted in 

opposition to class certification; plaintiff shall file her reply by May 2, 2017, and the hearing shall 

remain on calendar for 1:30 p.m. on May 18, 2017, or another date convenient for the Court.

Case 3:15-cv-02150-RS Document 64 Filed 03/08/17 Page 2 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION TO ADJUST CLASS CERTIFICATION 

OPPOSITION AND REPLY DEADLINES 

Civil Case No.: 3:15-cv-02150-RS 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: March 8, 2017 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

By: /s/ Cortlin H. Lannin

 Cortlin H. Lannin 

Attorneys for Defendant 

The Procter & Gamble Company 

DATED: March 8, 2017 GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP 

By: /s/ Adam Gutride

 Adam Gutride 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE 

COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 

P&G shall provide certain agreed-upon supplemental discovery to plaintiff by March 17, 

2017; P&G shall file its opposition to plaintiff’s motion for class certification by March 31, 2017; P&G 

shall make available for deposition the week of April 17 any experts whose declarations are submitted in 

opposition to class certification; plaintiff shall file her reply by May 2, 2017, and the hearing shall 

remain on calendar for 1:30 p.m. on May 18, 2017, or another date convenient for the Court. 

DATED: 

 THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

3/8/17

Case 3:15-cv-02150-RS Document 64 Filed 03/08/17 Page 3 of 3