Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02471/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02471-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JAREK MOLSKI

and DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION

SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK MOLSKI, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING

YOU HELP OTHERS, a California public

benefit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SUNRISE CAFÉ; MOTEL 6 OPERATING

L.P., a Delaware limited partnership;

MARIA DIVA, INC., a California

corporation,

Defendants. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

ORDER THEREON

CASE NO. 04-2471 JW

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this

action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own costs and

attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over

enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994)

(empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements).

Case 5:04-cv-02471-JW Document 21 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:04-cv-02471-JW Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through

their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

DATED: January 17, 2006 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Jennifer L. Steneberg

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

DATED: January 17, 2006 CAMPBELL, WARBURTON, FITZSIMMONS,

SMITH, MENDELL & PASTORE

By: /s/ Kelly Laughrin

Kelly Laughrin

Attorneys for Defendant MOTEL 6 OPERATING

L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

DATED: January 16, 2006 ALLMAN & NIELSEN, P.C. 

By: /s/ Sara B. Allman

Sara B. Allman

Attorneys for Defendant MARIA DIVA, INC. dba

SUNRISE CAFÉ

Case 5:04-cv-02471-JW Document 21 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 2 of 3 Case 5:04-cv-02471-JW Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 3

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Mutual Settlement Agreement and Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: January 18, 2006

Hon. James Ware

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:04-cv-02471-JW Document 21 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 3 of 3 Case 5:04-cv-02471-JW Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 3 of 3