Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02818/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02818-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY YAGER,

Plaintiff, CIV S-09-2818 MCE KJM PS

v.

FIRST HORIZON HOME LOAN CORP.

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

As provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the court may dismiss an action where

service of summons is not made within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. In the order

setting status conference, filed October 9, 2009, the court cautioned plaintiff that this action may

be dismissed if service was not timely completed. This action was filed October 9, 2009 and

plaintiff has not yet served defendants with summons.

A status conference was held before the undersigned on March 3, 2010. Plaintiff

failed to appear. It appears plaintiff has abandoned this litigation.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

1

Case 2:09-cv-02818-MCE -KJM Document 5 Filed 03/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections shall be served and

filed within seven days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 10, 2010. 

006

yager.57

2

Case 2:09-cv-02818-MCE -KJM Document 5 Filed 03/11/10 Page 2 of 2