Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_14-cv-01691/USCOURTS-casd-3_14-cv-01691-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCOS CAVALIER, Civil No. 14cv1691 WQH (DHB)

Plaintiff, ORDER

vs.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; 

WILLIAM GORE, Sheriff; 

SGT. KAMOSS, Deputy Sheriff; 

LT. MONTGOMERY, Lt. Sheriff;

BABCOCK #0106, Deputy Sheriff; 

EDGE #4706, Deputy Sheriff; 

LUSARDI, #0159, Deputy Sheriff;

MARTINEZ, #3156, Deputy Sheriff;

SOBASZEK, #3209, Deputy Sheriff;

TALAMANTEZ, # 6351, Deputy Sheriff; 

J. NAVARRO, #4431, Deputy Sheriff;

SPALSBURY, #0508, Deputy Sheriff; and

GONZALEZ #0109, Deputy Sheriff,

Defendants.

HAYES, Judge:

On September 25, 2014, Defendants Babcock, Edge, Gonzalez, Kamoss, Lusardi,

Martinez, Montgomery, Navarro, Sobaszek, Spalsbury, and Talamantez (“Moving

Defendants”) filed the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 18). The

docket reflects that Plaintiff Marcos Cavalier did not file an opposition. On May 13,

2015, United States Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick issued the Report and

1 14cv1691 WQH (DHB)

Case 3:14-cv-01691-WQH-DHB Document 25 Filed 06/22/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Recommendation, recommending that the motion to dismiss be granted, that the

Complaint be dismissed, that Plaintiff be granted leave to amend, and that Plaintiff be

ordered to show cause for failure to serve Defendant County of San Diego and Defendant

Gore. (ECF No. 24). The magistrate judge gave the parties until June 10, 2015 to file

any objections to the Report and Recommendation. The docket reflects that no objections

have been filed. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 24)

is ADOPTED as follows: page one to page fifteen, line nine, and page forty-four, line

eighteen, through page forty-six. The motion to dismiss (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED. 

The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice as to the Moving Defendants. Plaintiff

is granted leave to amend. No later than forty-five (45) days from the date this Order is

filed, Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff does not file a First

Amended Complaint within that time, the Clerk of the Court shall close the case without

further Order of the Court. 

This Order constitutes notice to Plaintiff that the Court will dismiss this action

without prejudice with respect to Defendants County of San Diego and Gore forty-five

(45) days from the date of this Order, unless, before that date, Plaintiff files proof that

service of the Summons and Complaint has been effectuated upon Defendants County of

San Diego and Gore. 

DATED: June 19, 2015

WILLIAM Q. HAYES

United States District Judge

2 14cv1691 WQH (DHB)

Case 3:14-cv-01691-WQH-DHB Document 25 Filed 06/22/15 Page 2 of 2