Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01301/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01301-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

TRI-DAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

RANDAL YICK,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:11-CV-01301-AWI-SMS

STIPULATED JUDGMENT

On July 28, 2016, this Court granted plaintiff Tri-Dam’s (“Tri-Dam”) motion for partial 

summary judgment on Tri-Dam’s two nuisance claims and entered a permanent injunction 

prohibiting defendant Randal Yick (“Yick”) from maintaining his dock on Tulloch Reservoir 

without a permit from Tri-Dam. 

That ruling did not resolve three of the five claims asserted in Tri-Dam’s Second 

Amended Complaint which essentially seek the same relief as the two nuisance claims which the 

Court adjudicated through its summary judgment ruling. Subsequently the parties entered into a 

stipulation to dismiss the remaining claims and have judgment entered pursuant to the Court’s 

ruling on the motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 107). Accordingly, the Court enters 

final judgment on Tri-Dam’s Second Amended Complaint as follows.

Case 1:11-cv-01301-AWI-SMS Document 110 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS HERBY ORDERED that Yick’s dock cannot be permitted as it presently exists 

because it extends outside of his property line in violation of the Shoreline Management Plan 

(“SMP”). Yick will be afforded the opportunity to remedy his violation of the SMP and apply for 

an encroachment permit from Tri-Dam by submitting an application on or before August 18, 

2016. Yick’s dock may be maintained only if Tri-Dam approves a permit application submitted 

as set forth above. Otherwise, Yick’s dock must be removed from Tulloch Reservoir no later 

than the later of: (1) 15 days after the date of denial of his permit application, or (2) August 27, 

2016, if no application is submitted by August 18, 2016.

Tri-Dam is the prevailing party in this matter.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter this Judgment pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Court will retain continuing jurisdiction over this matter to enforce this Judgment. 

If Yick fails to remove the dock by the time frame set forth above then Tri-Dam is 

authorized, pursuant to Rule 70(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to remove the dock at 

Yick’s expense. 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 16, 2016 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01301-AWI-SMS Document 110 Filed 08/16/16 Page 2 of 2