Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_07-cv-00751/USCOURTS-almd-2_07-cv-00751-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

SUE-ZANNE MANN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:07cv751-MHT

) (WO) 

JAMES A. DARDEN, ) 

)

Defendant. )

CORRECTED JUDGMENT

On the 23rd day of August 2011, after this cause

had been presented to a jury, a verdict was returned as

follows:

I. Tasing Incident

(1) Stage One: Do you find that defendant James

A. Darden is entitled to prevail at stage one?

Yes X 

No _____

If you find that Darden prevails at stage one, you

need not go any further. If you find that he does not

prevail at stage one, then you should continue to stage

two.

XXX

Case 2:07-cv-00751-MHT-SRW Document 146 Filed 08/24/11 Page 1 of 2
SO SAY WE ALL.

 /s/ Keith Judy 

 Foreperson

It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of

the court that judgment is entered in favor of

defendant James A. Darden and against plaintiff SueZanne Mann, with plaintiff Mann taking nothing by her

complaint.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against

plaintiff Mann, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this

document on the civil docket as a final judgment

pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 24th day of August, 2011.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00751-MHT-SRW Document 146 Filed 08/24/11 Page 2 of 2