Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01612/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01612-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:7413(b) Clean Air Act

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING PAGE LIMITS ON 

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, CROSS-MOTIONS AND REPLIES - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

HOLLAND 

&

HART LLP

222 SO. MAIN STREET, SUITE 2200

SALT 

LAKE 

CITY, UTAH 84101

MATTHEW B. HIPPLER (Cal. Bar No. 212036)

HOLLAND & HART LLP

5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor

Reno, NV 89511

Tel: (775) 327-3000

Fax: (775) 786-6179

mbhippler@hollandhart.com

STEVEN G. JONES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

EMILY C. SCHILLING (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

HOLLAND & HART LLP

222 So. Main Street, Suite 2200

Salt Lake City, UT 84101

Tel: (801) 799-5800

Fax: (801) 799-5700

sgjones@hollandhart.com

ecschilling@hollandhart.com

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLOBAL COMMUNITY MONITOR, a 

California nonprofit corporation; 

LABORERS’ INTERNATIONAL UNION 

OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL UNION 

NO. 783, an organized labor union; 

RANDAL SIPES, JR., an individual; 

RUSSEL COVINGTON, an individual; 

Plaintiffs,

v.

MAMMOTH PACIFIC, L.P., a California 

Limited Partnership; ORMAT NEVADA, 

INC., a Delaware Corporation; ORMAT 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware 

Corporation; and DOES I-X, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING 

PAGE LIMITS FOR DISPOSITIVE 

MOTIONS, CROSS-MOTIONS AND 

REPLIES

Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. 

2

Case 2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN Document 98 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING PAGE LIMITS ON 

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, CROSS-MOTIONS AND REPLIES - 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

HOLLAND 

&

HART LLP

222 SO. MAIN STREET, SUITE 2200

SALT 

LAKE 

CITY, UTAH 84101

RECITALS

On June 20, 2016, the Court entered an Order (Dkt No. 63) setting the briefing schedule for 

dispositive motions in this matter, ordering that the parties’ dispositive motions are to be filed on 

August 11, 2016.

Per the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt No. 31), page limits for points and authorities

are set at 20 pages for opening papers and responses and 10 pages for replies. Dkt. 31 at 5:3-5. The 

Pretrial Scheduling Order also requires that “all issues the parties with to resolve on summary 

judgment must be raised together in one (1) motion or cross-motion.” Id. at 4:13-14.

STIPULATION

In order to comply with the Court’s Order to present all issue capable of resolution in a single 

dispositive motion, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court extend the page limits on all 

dispositive motions, any cross-motions and any responses to such motions to thirty (30) pages, and to 

extend the page limits on reply memoranda to 15 pages, exclusive of exhibits and supporting 

documentation and exclusive of the Statements of Undisputed Facts required under Local Rule 260(a).

SO STIPULATED this 4th day of August, 2016.

HOLLAND & HART LLP

s/ Steven G. Jones 

MATTHEW HIPPLER

STEVEN G. JONES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

EMILY C. SCHILLING (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Attorneys for Defendants

LOZEAU DRURY LLP

s/ Douglas J. Chermak

RICHARD L. DRURY

DOUGLAS J. CHERMAK

MEREDITH WILENSKY

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN Document 98 Filed 10/05/16 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING PAGE LIMITS ON 

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, CROSS-MOTIONS AND REPLIES - 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

HOLLAND 

&

HART LLP

222 SO. MAIN STREET, SUITE 2200

SALT 

LAKE 

CITY, UTAH 84101

ORDER

Based on the parties’ stipulation above, and good cause being shown, namely, the need to 

allow the presentation of all issues capable of resolution by dispositive motion in a single motion, the 

Court hereby orders that the page limits on all dispositive motions, any cross-motions and any 

responses to such motions are set at thirty (30) pages, and the page limit on reply memoranda is set at 

15 pages, exclusive of exhibits and supporting documentation and exclusive of the Statements of 

Undisputed Facts required under Local Rule 260(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 4, 2016

Case 2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN Document 98 Filed 10/05/16 Page 3 of 3