Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03836/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03836-43/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NSIGHT, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

PEOPLESOFT, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 04-3836 MMC (MEJ)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S

MOTION RE: CASE DEADLINES

Before the Court is Defendant's motion, filed October 4, 2006, titled "Motion of Oracle USA,

Inc. Regarding Case Deadlines; Expert Discovery; and Plaintiff's Refusal to Permit Disclosure

Information Relevant to Its Damage Claim." (Doc. #185.) On October 11, 2006, the Honorable

Maxine M. Chesney granted Defendant's request to modify the Amended Scheduling Order, filed

August 9, 2006, to extend the deadline for completion of expert discovery from October 6, 2006 to

October 13, 2006, for the purpose of deposing Plaintiff's expert, Anu Maitra. Judge Chesney

referred the remaining two issues in Defendant's motion to the undersigned. (Doc. #190.) 

Having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court

hereby rules as follows:

1) Defendant's request regarding its rebuttal expert on damages is hereby GRANTED.

Defendant may offer the rebuttal expert opinion of Mark Stepka, for the purpose of rebutting

Dr. Maitra's damage opinion, and the parties shall agree on a mutually convenient date for

Mr. Stepka's deposition.

Case 3:04-cv-03836-MMC Document 191 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

2) Defendant's request regarding CSC "Letter of Interest" discovery is hereby GRANTED. 

Unless Plaintiff authorizes Paul Tucker to make disclosures regarding CSC's discussions

with nSight within four days from the date of this Order, Defendant may subpoena Mr.

Tucker for a deposition. The deposition shall take place on or before November 10, 2006. 

Whether Plaintiff authorizes Mr. Tucker to make disclosures or Defendant deposes him, Mr.

Tucker may make the disclosures without fear of being accused of breaching the

Nondisclosure Agreement between Plaintiff and CSC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 17, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03836-MMC Document 191 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 2