Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-02168/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-02168-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 In her Report and Recommendation. Magistrate Judge Burns correctly determined

that Petitioner’s habeas petition is untimely and, alternatively, that his claims are

procedurally defaulted. (Doc. 14.)

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Roman Robaina,

Petitioner, 

v.

Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 11-CV-2168-PHX-PGR (MHB)

 ORDER

The Court having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Burns, and no party having filed an objection,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 14) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by the Court.1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s First Amended Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus (Doc. 5) is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the dismissal of the Petition is

justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling

debatable.

Case 2:11-cv-02168-PGR Document 15 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

DATED this 14th day of May, 2013.

Case 2:11-cv-02168-PGR Document 15 Filed 05/14/13 Page 2 of 2