Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01215/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01215-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 8:1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

MARIANNE A. PANSA

Assistant United States Attorney

Federal Building, Room 3654

1130 O Street

Fresno, California 93721

Telephone: (559) 498-7272

Attorneys for Respondents

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Gurpreet Kaur et al., ) 1: 05 CV 0215 REC DLB

)

Petitioners, ) STIPULATION RE :

) RESPONDENTS’ ANSWER

v. ) AND ORDER

)

)

Michael Chertoff, et al., )

)

)

Respondents. )

__________________________________________)

On September 30, 2005, the petitioners Gurpreet Kaur et al., through their attorneys

James M. Makasian, and Steve Simonian, served a Complaint on the respondents, Michael

Chertoff et al., requesting that the court adjudicate their naturalization applications. The

respondents Answer to the Complaint is due on November 29, 2005. The parties through

undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that the respondents’ Answer can be filed by January 30,

2006. Good cause exits for this stipulation because the respondents are working to adjudicate the

petitioners’ applications for citizenship and the matter may be resolved if given the extra time. If

the issue is not resolved, the parties stipulate that the respondents will file an Answer on the date

above and that the Joint Scheduling Conference Report will be filed on February 7, 2006. The

Case 1:05-cv-01215-REC-DLB Document 18 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The court changed the scheduling conference which was initially set for December 15, 1

2005 to February 14, 2006.

2

Scheduling Conference is currently scheduled for February 14, 2006, at 8 :45 am.1

Dated: November 29, 2005 Respectfully Submitted,

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Marianne A. Pansa

Marianne A. Pansa

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Respondents

By: /s/ James M. Makasian

James M. Makasian

Attorney for the Petitioners

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the respondents’ Answer is due on January 30, 2006. The Joint Scheduling

Conference Report is due on February 7, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 30, 2005 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01215-REC-DLB Document 18 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2