Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80102/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80102-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY BAUMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

V THEATER GROUP, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-mc-80102-JSC 

ORDER RE: APPLICATION FOR 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO 

TWILIO, INC., RE: SUBPOENA

Re: Dkt. No. 1

Now pending before the Court is Jeremy Bauman and Bijan Razilou’s Application for an 

Order to Show Cause Why Twilio, Inc., Should Not Be Held in Contempt. (Dkt. No. 1.) Messrs. 

Bauman and Razilou are plaintiffs in two actions pending the United States District Court for the 

District of Nevada. See Bauman c. V. Theater Group, LLC, at al., No. 14-1125 RBF-PAL (D. 

Nev.); Razilou v. V. Theater Group, LLC, et al., No. 14-1160 RBF-PAL (D. Nev.). On February 

12, 2015, Bauman and Razilou served a third-party subpoena in this District on Twilio, Inc. 

(“Twilio”) seeking production of documents by March 16, 2015. (Dkt. Nos. 2-4 & 2-5.) Bauman 

and Razilou contend that third-party Twilio failed to respond to the subpoena and seek an order to 

show cause as to why Twilio should not be held in contempt until it responds to the subpoena. 

The Court thereafter issued an Order to Show Cause as to why Twilio should not be held in 

contempt. (Dkt. No. 3.) Twilio’s response contends that it was never served with the subpoena. 

(Dkt. No. 4.) Plaintiffs and third-party Twilio appeared for a hearing on April 16, 2015. As stated 

on the record, the parties are ordered to meet and confer in person regarding Twilio’s compliance 

with the subpoena. The Court also established the following schedule for any further disputes 

regarding the subpoena.

If the parties are unable to resolve the issue through a good faith in person meet and confer, 

Case 3:15-mc-80102-JSC Document 9 Filed 04/17/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

the parties shall file a joint letter brief regarding the dispute by April 29, 2015 in accordance with 

the Court’s Standing Order. Unless the parties agree otherwise, Plaintiffs shall provide Twilio 

with their portion of the joint letter brief by April 22, 2015, Twilio shall provide its responsive 

portion of the joint letter by April 27, 2015, and Plaintiffs shall file the joint letter brief combining 

the two sections and adding an optional reply by the close of business April 29, 2015. Upon 

receipt of the letter brief, the Court will take the matter under submission and notify the parties if 

further argument is required.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 17, 2015

________________________

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-mc-80102-JSC Document 9 Filed 04/17/15 Page 2 of 2