Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04432/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04432-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LITTLER MENDELSON

GSOCahloinia Slteei

20lh Floor

415 433 1940

MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Bar No. 162496

JEREMY A. ROTH, Bar No. 129007

LITTLER MENDELSON

A Professional Corporation

650 California Street, 20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

Telephone: 415.433.1940

Facsimile: 415.399.8490

E-mail: mhoffrnan@littler.com

Attorneys for Defendant

AUTOZONE, INC.

JAMES A. KRUTCIK, Bar No. 140550

A. NICHOLAS GEORGGIN, Bar No. 170925

Members of BAILEY, PINNEY, GEORGGIN & KRUTCIK, LLP

26021 Acero

Mission Veja, CA 92691

Telephone: 949.367.8590

Facsimile: 949.367.8597

E-mail: jkrutcik@kglawoffices.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CLAUDIA MORENO and MICHELE MEDRANO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CLAUDIA MORENO;

MICHELE MEDRANO,

Plaintiffs,

V.

AUTOZONE, INC.,

Defendant.

STIP. AND ORDER TO CONTINUE

HEARING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTES

Case No. C 05-4432 MJJ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO CONTINUE HEARING ON

DISCOVERY DISPUTES

Former Date: July 1 9, 2006

Time: 1:30 p.m.

Ctrm: B

New Date: August 9, 2006

Time: 10:30 a.m.

Ctrm: B

Hon. Magistrate Judge Edward Chen

1 . CASE NO. C05-4432 M

Case 3:05-cv-04432-MJJ Document 54 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-04432-CRB Document 55 Filed 07/20/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant, through their

respective counsel and subject to Court approval, to the following:

1. The Court conducted a hearing on the parties' disputes over the scope of

document production as part of the initial disclosures in this proposed class action. At the hearing, the

Court ordered Defendant to produce specified categories of records for two Fresno stores where

Plaintiffs worked. Based in part on assumptions that the requested records involved easily retrievable

electronic files, the parties agreed to a production date of July 7, 2006. The Court ordered the parties to

provide a joint report on the production by July 17, and set a hearing on the disputed issues for July 19,

2006.

2. Defendant did not produce the requested records until July 14,2006. Among the

reasons for this delay, Defendant represents to Plaintiffs and the Court that the requested information

was not easily accessible in electronic form; some data needed to be retrieved and converted, and other

records were only retrievable in paper form and were retrieved from local facilities in California (not a

central location in Tennessee). The data provided to Plaintiffs included five disks of electronic

information and approximately 5,000 pages of documents.

3. Furthermore, Defendant represents to Plaintiffs and the Court that retrieval of the

requested security information has proven more difficult than originally anticipated. As of July 14,

2006, Defendant had not obtained or provided the requested security data to Plaintiffs.

4. In accordance with the Court's instructions, counsel for the parties have met and

conferred on the burden and expense of production, as well as the potential conversion of electronic

data. This is an ongoing process. After Plaintiffs have had an opportunity to review the initial

production, further conferences may be needed to reach agreements on whether an additional

production of documents or conversion of data is appropriate.

5. For all of the foregoing reasons, counsel for the parties contacted the Court's

Clerk on July 14 and requested a continuance of the hearing to August 9, 2006. The Court Clerk

LITTLER MENDELSON

A PROFESSIONAL COHPORATIO

650 California Stieel

20th Flooi

San Fiancisco CA 94108 2693

415 433 1940

STIP. AND ORDER TO CONTINUE

HEARING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTES

2. CASE NO. C05-4432 MJJ

Case 3:05-cv-04432-MJJ Document 54 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-04432-CRB Document 55 Filed 07/20/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1!

A, NICHOLAS GEOROG1N

BAILED PWNEY GEOROGIN & KRUTOK

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CLAUDIA MORENO, M1CMELE MEDRANO

12

!.:« «!,-£lSO'i

am

indicated that a hearing date was available on August 9,2006 at 10:30 am Plaintiffs and Defendant

request that the Court continue the hearing on this matter to August 9,2006 at 10:30

Dated; July jM!^_, 2006

^ALuA^^,

MICHAEL HOFFMAN

 L

L1TTL2R MENDELSON

Attonu.ys-for Defendant

AUTOZONE, INC.

Dated: July jjj^, 2006

QBflER

Puraiant to the above stipulation, the Court continues the hewing on this discover}'

matter to August 9,2006 at 10:30 a.m. The patties shall submit a joint report to die Court on or before

August 4,2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

13

14

(5

16

1?

18

19 M

JQ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE"

21 _

l''ma«(jdc:81 J06773 i »133»Z!e6

T>

24

25

26

2?

28

STIR AND ORDER TO CONTINUE - HEARING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTES V.U.-HIA.

Case 3:05-cv-04432-MJJ Document 54 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 3 of 3

July 20, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:05-cv-04432-CRB Document 55 Filed 07/20/06 Page 3 of 3