Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01925/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01925-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL C. HAMILTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

J.A. YATES, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-001925-LJO-MJS PC 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S SURREPLY

(ECF Nos. 30, 31)

Plaintiff Paul C. Hamilton (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 14, 2008. 

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed on December 10,

2012. Plaintiff filed an opposition on December 26, 2012, Defendants filed a reply on

January 30, 2013. The motion has been submitted upon the record. Local Rule 230(l). 

However, on January 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed a sur-reply. (ECF No. 30.) Defendants filed

a motion asking that the Court strike Plaintiff’s sur-reply. (ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff filed a

reply (ECF No. 31) and Defendants filed an opposition (ECF No. 33).

No briefing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss is permitted beyond the opposition and

reply absent leave of court. The Court did not grant Plaintiff leave to file a sur-reply and

the Court does not desire any further briefing on the motion. Accordingly, Defendants’

1

Case 1:10-cv-01925-LJO-MJS Document 36 Filed 08/15/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

motion to strike Plaintiff’s sur-reply is HEREBY GRANTED and Plaintiff’s sur-reply is

STRICKEN from the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 15, 2013 /s/Michael J. Seng 

ci4d6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-01925-LJO-MJS Document 36 Filed 08/15/13 Page 2 of 2