Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-04000/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-04000-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CIRCLE CLICK MEDIA LLC, a

California limited liability 

company, METRO TALENT, LLC, a 

California limited liability 

company, and CTNY INSURANCE 

GROUP LLC, a Connecticut limited 

liability company, on behalf of 

themselves and all others 

similarly situated,

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

REGUS MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, a 

Delaware limited liability 

company; REGUS BUSINESS CENTRE 

LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company; REGUS plc, a 

Jersey, Channel Islands public 

limited company; HQ GLOBAL 

WORKPLACES LLC, a Delaware 

limited liability company, and 

DOES 1 through 50, 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 3:12-CV-04000-SC

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' 

MOTION TO SEAL 

Plaintiffs filed a motion to seal unredacted versions of 

Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support 

of Motion for Class Certification ("Reply") and Reply Declaration 

of S. Chandler Visher in Support of Motion for Class Certification 

("Reply Declaration"). ECF No. 294. Plaintiffs' Reply and Reply 

Case 3:12-cv-04000-EMC Document 313 Filed 08/24/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

Declaration contain information that Defendants have designated as 

confidential pursuant to a protective order. Pursuant to Local 

Rule 79-5(e), Defendants submitted a response supporting some of 

the confidentiality designations. ECF No. 310. Defendants note, 

however, that certain redacted excerpts do not contain confidential 

information. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion to seal is GRANTED IN 

PART and DENIED in part as described in the table below. 

ECF No. (Description) Ruling on Motion to File Under Seal 

34-4 (unredacted Reply) DENIED as to page 3, lines 1, 4, 7, 

and 9; page 6, line 14; page 12, lines 

12 and 15; page 11, line 8; page 15, 

lines 22-23 

GRANTED IN PART as to all other 

redactions 

34-6 (unredacted Reply 

Declaration of S. Chandler 

Visher) 

DENIED as to page 7, lines 20-11; and 

page 9, lines 6 and 20-24 

GRANTED IN PART as to all other 

redactions 

 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Dated: August 25, 2015 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:12-cv-04000-EMC Document 313 Filed 08/24/15 Page 2 of 2