Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-00582/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-00582-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

G. SPANGLER, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:24-cv-00582 KJM AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On May 21, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 

served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 

findings and recommendations. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:24-cv-00582-KJM-AC Document 10 Filed 09/10/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 8) are adopted in full; 

 2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 6) is denied; 

 3. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee in 

its entirety in order to proceed as a result of being declared a three-strikes litigant within the 

meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and 

 4. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (ECF 

No. 1) is denied as premature. 

DATED: September 9, 2024. 

Case 2:24-cv-00582-KJM-AC Document 10 Filed 09/10/24 Page 2 of 2