Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01636/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01636-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES W. WINDHAM,

 Plaintiff,

v.

M. MARIN, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:14-cv-01636-LJO-BAM (PC)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE 

DAYS

(ECF No. 49)

Plaintiff Charles W. Windham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth 

Amendment claims of excessive force against Defendants M. Marin, D. Uribe, W. Rasley, J. 

Contreras, A. Capano, R. Rubio, and Doe #1, and for deliberate indifference to serious medical 

needs against Defendants C. Navarro, V. Morales, M. Marin, and S. Shiver. 

On September 2, 2015, Defendants filed a combined motion for summary judgment or 

partial summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff was provided with notice of the 

requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 49-7.) Plaintiff was 

granted several extensions of time to file his opposition to Defendants’ motion. However, even 

under the extended deadline, Plaintiff’s opposition was due on or before November 9, 2015. To 

date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a 

statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff is 

Case 1:14-cv-01636-DAD-BAM Document 56 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action, with 

prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 25, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01636-DAD-BAM Document 56 Filed 11/30/15 Page 2 of 2