Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03189/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03189-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1443(1) Rent, Lease &amp; Ejectment

---

Case No. 15-cv-03189 NC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAKIT TSUI,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELSO J. SANCHEZ, and FRANCES R. 

SANCHEZ,

Defendants.

Case No.15-cv-03189 NC 

REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION TO REMAND

TO STATE COURT; REQUEST FOR 

REASSIGNMENT TO DISTRICT 

COURT JUDGE

Re: Dkt. No. 6

On July 24, 2015, the Court ordered pro se defendants Celso J. Sanchez and Frances 

R. Sanchez to show cause why this case should not be remanded to state court for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction. The Court gave defendants until August 13, 2015, to respond 

to the Order to Show Cause; otherwise, the Court would remand the action to state court. 

Dkt. No. 6 at 3. Defendants have failed to respond. 

Accordingly, the Court recommends that the district court remand this case to the 

Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara. 

While plaintiff Kakit Tsui consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge, Dkt. 

No. 8, defendants have not. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Because the undersigned magistrate 

judge lacks jurisdictional authority, the clerk must reassign this case to a district court 

judge. Any party may object to the recommendation to remand within 14 days. Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 72.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 14, 2015 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:15-cv-03189-EJD Document 10 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 1