Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02327/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02327-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

51078/1988612.1 Case No. CV 06-2327 RMW (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE: SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS IN 

CONNECTION WITH THE NOVEMBER 3, 2006 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP

Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737)

claudestern@quinnemanuel.com

Scott G. Lawson (Bar No. 174671)

scottlawson@quinnemanuel.com

Michael D. Powell (Bar No. 202850)

mikepowell@quinnemanuel.com

Jennie L. Wang (Bar No. 233392)

jenniewang@quinnemanuel.com

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 875-6600

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INTUIT INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

INTUIT INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

H&R BLOCK EASTERN ENTERPRISES, 

INC. H&R BLOCK ENTERPRISES, INC., 

H&R BLOCK AND ASSOCIATES, L.P., and 

HRB ROYALTY, INC.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CV 06-2327 RMW (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER RE: SUBMISSION OF 

ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS IN 

CONNECTION WITH THE NOVEMBER 

3, 2006 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' 

MOTION TO DISMISS

CIVIL L.R. 7-11, 7-12

JUDGE: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

Case 5:06-cv-02327-RMW Document 206 Filed 11/09/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

51078/1988612.1 -1- Case No. CV 06-2327 RMW (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE: SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS IN 

CONNECTION WITH THE NOVEMBER 3, 2006 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

STIPULATION

Plaintiff INTUIT INC. (“Intuit”) and Defendants H & R BLOCK ENTERPRISES, INC. 

(“Enterprises”), H & R BLOCK EASTERN ENTERPRISES, INC. (“Eastern”) (appearing 

specially), H & R BLOCK AND ASSOCIATES L.P. (“Associates”) (appearing specially), and 

HRB ROYALTY, INC. (“Royalty”) (appearing specially)1(collectively, “Moving Defendants”) 

hereby stipulate and move this Court for an Order adopting the following:

WHEREAS, on October 23, 2006 Intuit filed a Supplemental Brief in Opposition to 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction;

WHEREAS, on October 23, 2006 Associates and Eastern served supplemental 

interrogatory responses to Intuit’s First Set of Interrogatories Regarding Jurisdiction;

WHEREAS, on October 27, 2006 Royalty, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties,

produced documents in response to Intuit’s jurisdictional requests for production;

WHEREAS, on October 26, 2006 a telephonic hearing was held in H&R Block Eastern 

Enterprises, Inc. HRB Royalty, Inc., H&R Block Enterprises, Inc. and H&R Block and Associates, 

L.P. v. Intuit Inc., Case No. 06-0039-CV-SOW, pending in the Western District Court of Missouri, 

regarding Intuit’s desire to use certain documents produced by the Block defendants in that action 

in connection with its supplemental jurisdiction briefing in this action;

WHEREAS, at the October 26, 2006 hearing Magistrate Judge Knox ordered that Intuit 

could use certain documents produced in the Missouri action in connection with its opposition to 

Moving Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss;

WHEREAS, Moving Defendants do not object to Intuit's submitting these documents to 

the Court so long as any materials identified by Moving Defendants as confidential are filed under 

seal, as per the prior practice of the parties;

1

Special appearances are made by these parties for the limited purpose of this scheduling 

order. By entering into this stipulation, these entities do not knowingly or intentionally waive any 

objection to personal jurisdiction in this Court.

Case 5:06-cv-02327-RMW Document 206 Filed 11/09/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

51078/1988612.1 -2- Case No. CV 06-2327 RMW (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE: SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS IN 

CONNECTION WITH THE NOVEMBER 3, 2006 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

NOW, WHEREFORE, the parties agree that these documents may be submitted to the 

Court for consideration in connection with the supplemental briefing on Moving Defendants’ 

motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The documents shall be submitted with a 

supplemental declaration in support of Intuit's opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss for lack 

of personal jurisdiction. Where appropriate, documents will be filed under seal in compliance 

with the stipulated protective order entered by the Court in this action and the parties' prior 

practice in this case.

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES that the 

aforementioned documents may be submitted to the Court for its consideration in connection with 

the Moving Defendants' motion to dismiss. 

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: November 1, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER &

HEDGES, LLP

By /s/ Scott G. Lawson

Scott G. Lawson

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INTUIT INC.

DATED: November 1, 2006 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

By /s/ Jeff Bleich

Jeffrey L. Bleich

Attorneys for Moving Defendants

Case 5:06-cv-02327-RMW Document 206 Filed 11/09/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

51078/1988612.1 -3- Case No. CV 06-2327 RMW (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE: SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS IN 

CONNECTION WITH THE NOVEMBER 3, 2006 HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

[] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November __, 2006

Ronald M. Whyte

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-02327-RMW Document 206 Filed 11/09/06 Page 4 of 4