Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_99-cv-20736/USCOURTS-cand-5_99-cv-20736-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

This order amends the Court’s July 19, 2006 scheduling order to correct typographical errors.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Raphael E. CALIX,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

C.A. TERHUNE, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

No. C-99-20736 JF

AMENDED ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR

ENFORCEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

AGREEMENT [Docket No. 163]

On June 22, 2006, Plaintiff Raphael Calix filed a letter that the Court has construed as a

motion for enforcement of the settlement agreement in this action (“the Motion”). Pursuant to the

stipulation of the parties in the settlement agreement, the Motion has been referred to the

undersigned for disposition. The Court sets the following briefing schedule on the Motion: 

Defendants shall file an Opposition to the Motion no later than Friday, September 1, 2006. 

Plaintiff may file a responsive brief no later than Friday, September 22, 2006. If the Court

determines, after the Motion has been fully briefed, that oral argument on the Motion is necessary, a

hearing will be set at that time.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 20, 2006

 JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:99-cv-20736-JF Document 166 Filed 07/20/06 Page 1 of 1