Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04410/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04410-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT IN ITS

ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE/PROPOSED ORDER

CASE NO. CV07-01444 (EFMX)

Robert E. Freitas, Esq. (SBN 77181)

Jason Angell, Esq. (SBN 221607)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTTCLIFFE, LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, California 94025

Telephone: 1 (650) 614-7400

Facsimile: 1 (650) 614-7401

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IA GLOBAL, INC. and MARK SCOTT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IA GLOBAL, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; MARK E. SCOTT, an 

individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HARTFORD CASUALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a New 

Jersey corporation, and DOES 1 

through 100, inclusive,

Case No. C06 4410 (MMC)

The Hon. Maxine Chesney

STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF 

LAWSUIT IN ITS ENTIRETY 

WITH PREJUDICE;

[PROPOSED]

ORDER THEREON

WHEREAS Plaintiffs IA Global, Inc. and Mark Scott commenced this 

lawsuit against defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company;

WHEREAS the parties agreed to settle their disputes during a mediation held 

on January 16, 2007;

WHEREAS the Court dismissed this lawsuit without prejudice on February 

7, 2007 after the mediator advised the parties had settled the case at the mediation; 

and

WHEREAS Hartford paid the agreed-upon settlement payment and the 

parties and their lawyers have executed a settlement and release agreement;

Case 3:06-cv-04410-MMC Document 18 Filed 05/07/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT IN ITS

ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE/PROPOSED ORDER

CASE NO. CV07-01444 (EFMX)

IA Global, Inc., Mark Scott, and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company , 

through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and respectfully request 

that the Court enter the attached order:

1. Vacating its dismissal of the lawsuit without prejudice;

2. Dismissing the lawsuit in its entirety with prejudice; and

3. Retaining jurisdiction over this matter for the sole purpose of 

adjudicating any dispute that may arise over the enforcement of the parties’ 

settlement agreement.

4. Counsel for IA Global and Mark Scott (Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe) 

has the authority to electronically file this stipulation and proposed order on behalf 

of Hartford Casualty Insurance Company.

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: May 4, 2007 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTTCLIFFE, 

LLP

By: /s/ Jason S. Angell /s/

ROBERT E. FREITAS,

JASON ANGELL

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IA GLOBAL, INC. and MARK SCOTT

DATED: May 4, 2007 MICHELMAN & ROBINSON, LLP

By: /s/Robin James /s/

DEAN B. HERMAN,

CATHERINE L. RIVARD,

ROBIN JAMES

Attorneys for Defendant

HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY

Case 3:06-cv-04410-MMC Document 18 Filed 05/07/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3- STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT IN ITS

ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE/PROPOSED ORDER

CASE NO. CV07-01444 (EFMX)

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B., I, Jason S. Angell, hereby attest that Ms. Robin 

James, counsel for Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, has concurred in the 

filing of this document.

/s/

Jason S. Angell

Case 3:06-cv-04410-MMC Document 18 Filed 05/07/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4- STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT IN ITS

ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE/PROPOSED ORDER

CASE NO. CV07-01444 (EFMX)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Having reviewed the stipulation to dismissal with prejudice executed by 

counsel for all parties in this lawsuit, the Court issues the following order pursuant 

to the stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the dismissal without prejudice entered by 

this Court on February 2, 2007 is vacated.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its 

entirety with prejudice.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain 

jurisdiction over this matter for the sole purpose of adjudicating any dispute that 

may arise over the enforcement of the parties’ settlement agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 

HONORABLE MAXINE CHESNEY

U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

May 7, 2007

Case 3:06-cv-04410-MMC Document 18 Filed 05/07/07 Page 4 of 4