Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02273/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02273-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 06cv2273

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

A. J. OLIVER,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 06CV2273 JLS (BLM) 

ORDER (1) GRANTING RULE

56(f) CONTINUANCE OF CROSSMOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT and (2) DENYING

DEFENDANT’S ORIGINAL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

(Doc. Nos. 26, 45)

vs.

KFC CORPORATION d/b/a KFC

#Y450025; PURCELL WEBB, TRUSTEE of

that certain REVOCABLE TRUST dated

NOVEMBER 10, 1982,

Defendant.

Presently before the Court is the declaration of Lynn Hubbard, III, counsel for A. J. Oliver

(“plaintiff”). Defendant KFC Corporation previously filed a motion for summary judgment on

September 24, 2007. (Doc. No. 26.) Plaintiff filed his cross-motion on October 1, 2007. (Doc.

No. 35.) The case was then reassigned from the Hon. John A. Houston to the Hon. Janis L.

Sammartino on October 5, 2007, and the hearing date on the motion was subsequently reset. On

January 4, 2008, defendant KFC Corporation (“KFC”) filed, without warning, a much larger

“amended motion” for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 41.) The amended motion includes factual

allegations that KFC re-modeled its restaurant and legal arguments that plaintiff’s Americans with

Disabilities Act claim now fails for mootness. Plaintiff seeks relief under Rule 56(f) to allow

additional time for his expert to return to KFC’s restaurant to conduct an inspection of the

Case 3:06-cv-02273-JLS-BLM Document 50 Filed 01/25/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 06cv2273

remodeled restaurant. KFC and co-defendant Purcell Webb have filed oppositions to the request. 

(Doc. Nos. 46-47.)

Having reviewed the declaration of plaintiff’s counsel and defendants’ oppositions, the

Court hereby ORDERS the following:

—KFC’s original motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 26) is denied as moot. KFC’s

amended motion is now the operative motion.

—The Court grants plaintiff’s request and orders plaintiff’s expert to conduct a site inspection of

KFC’s restaurant within four (4) weeks of the date this Order is docketed. 

—Plaintiff shall file his opposition to KFC’s amended motion no later than Friday, March 7, 2008. 

—KFC shall file its reply in support of its amended motion no later than Friday, March 14, 2008.

—The Court hereby vacates the hearing on the cross-motions previously set for Friday, February

8, 2008. When the Court has received KFC’s reply, the Court shall set a new hearing date at that

time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 25, 2008

Honorable Janis L. Sammartino

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-02273-JLS-BLM Document 50 Filed 01/25/08 Page 2 of 2