Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02396/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02396-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

CASE NO. C-07-02396 WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER 

E. JEFFREY GRUBE (SB# 167324) 

jeffgrube@paulhastings.com 

JOHN POST (SB# 233236) 

johnpost@paulhastings.com 

ANDREA M. LINDEMANN (SB# 244937) 

andrealindemann@paulhastings.com 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

55 Second Street 

Twenty-Fourth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 

Telephone: (415) 856-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 

Attorneys for Defendant 

United Parcel Service, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TERESA PADILLA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 

COMPANY, dba, UNITED PARCEL 

SERVICE CO. (AIR) and Does 1-50, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C-07-02396 WHA 

DISCOVERY HEARING; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Date: October 17, 2007 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

Courtroom: 9, 19th Floor 

Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup 

Case 3:07-cv-02396-WHA Document 24 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:07-cv-02396-WHA Document 26 Filed 10/22/07 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. C-07-02396 WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Court, having considered the papers submitted by the Defendant, the 

arguments of counsel during the hearing on October 17, 2007, and good cause appearing, hereby 

orders the following: 

Plaintiff is to appear at the offices of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky, & Walker, LLP, 55 

2nd Street, Twenty-Fourth Floor, San Francisco, California 94105, on November 1, 2007, at 9:00 

a.m. At this date and time, Plaintiff is ordered to bring for inspection and copying the documents 

that she has failed to produce to Defendant to date: the initial disclosures, due August 31, 2007, 

and the responses to Defendant’s first request for production of documents, due August 29, 2007. 

Plaintiff shall submit to her deposition at that time. The parties are to state on the record what 

documents Plaintiff has produced and what, if any, documents she has not produced. The 

Defendant may take a recess to examine and copy said documents and is then to resume the 

deposition. If the Defendant needs additional time to complete the deposition, the deposition may 

continue on November 2, 2007, resuming at 9:00 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October ___, 2007 By: 

JUDGE WILLIAM H. ALSUP 

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

LEGAL_US_W # 57337742.1 

Case 3:07-cv-02396-WHA Document 24 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 2 of 2

22

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:07-cv-02396-WHA Document 26 Filed 10/22/07 Page 2 of 2