Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00990/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00990-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOBBY W. ENDSLEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S- 04-O990 FCD GGH P

vs.

YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983. Plaintiff is proceeding against in this action against the Yolo County Sheriff’s Department

and several individual employees of that department. On June 17, 2005, the court ordered

plaintiff to send further information as to one of the defendant’s, Yolo County Sheriff’s Dept.

Correctional Officer Banuelos, because process directed to that individual had been returned

unserved as “undeliverable.” Plaintiff was given 60 days to return the completed USM-285

form as to defendant Banuelos as well as two copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed on

October 18, 2004. On June 17, 2005, three of the defendants filed their answer, the County of

Yolo, and defendants Fristoe and Gaines.

On August 25, 2005, plaintiff sent a letter asking that his case be dropped until he

is out of prison due to apparent difficulties he is having in responding to the court’s June 17,

Case 2:04-cv-00990-FCD-GGH Document 23 Filed 09/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2005 order. He seeks dismissal without prejudice of this action; however, plaintiff appears not to

realize that once his action is voluntarily dismissed, he may only proceed by filing a new action. 

The court will grant plaintiff an additional 60 days to respond to the June 17, 2005

order. If he is unable to access the required information with respect to defendant Banuelos by

way of discovery, the California Public Records Act, Cal. Govt. Code, § 6250, or any other

available means and his access is denied or unreasonably delayed, he may seek judicial

intervention, as he was informed in the court’s earlier order on this subject. If he seeks to

proceed only against those defendants who have been served and have answered, he may proceed

in this action and defendant Banuelos can be dismissed without dismissal of the entire action.

Should plaintiff seek voluntary dismissal without prejudice of the entire action, he

must so inform the court within 30 days. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 9/12/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

ends0990.ord

Case 2:04-cv-00990-FCD-GGH Document 23 Filed 09/12/05 Page 2 of 2