Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02309/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02309-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

06cv2309

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS GRIMES,

CDCR #V-90377,

Civil No. 06-2309 BTM (LSP)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISSOLVING STAY AND

vs. ISSUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

JAMES E. TILTON; A. FAVILA;

S. JUAREZ; REVEREND STEVE

FRANCIS; ALAN HERNANDEZ;

GEORGE GIURBINO; V.M. ALMAGER;

Defendants.

On May 18, 2009, this Court issued an Order granting an application to stay the action

pending Defendants’ interlocutory appeal of the Court’s order denying Defendants’ motion for

summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. 

On June 17, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a memorandum affirming

the District Court’s denial of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity

grounds based on Plaintiff’s claim under the Religious Land Use and Personalized Persons Act

(“RLUIPA”). The Ninth Circuit remanded the issue of whether Defendants are entitled to

qualified immunity on Plaintiff’s First Amendment claim. The formal mandate was issued on

July 9, 2010.

/ / /

Case 3:06-cv-02309-BTM-WVG Document 162 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 06cv2309

The Court hereby DISSOLVES the stay in this matter issued on May 18, 2009.

Defendants are ordered to file supplemental briefing to their original motion for summary

judgment relating to the issue of qualified immunity on Plaintiff’s First Amendment claims only.

This supplemental briefing must by filed with the Court and served on Plaintiff no later than

Friday, August 28, 2010. Plaintiff must then file and serve either an Opposition or a Notice of

Non-Opposition no later than Friday, September 17, 2010. Plaintiff is also directed to refer to

the Court’s Order dated August 7, 2008 providing Plaintiff with notice of the rules and

ramifications of a Rule 56 motion pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998)

(en banc) and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988). No reply brief is necessary.

The Court will then take the matter under submission and will issue its written opinion soon

thereafter. Thus, unless otherwise ordered, no appearances are required and no oral argument

will be heard. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 12, 2010

Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-02309-BTM-WVG Document 162 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 2