Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02518/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02518-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES NEUMANN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2518 FCD GGH P

vs.

GOVERNOR ARNOLD

SCHWARZENEGGER,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed February 8, 2005, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On April 1, 2005, plaintiff was granted an

additional 30 days to amend the complaint. That period has now expired, and plaintiff has not

filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

Case 2:04-cv-02518-FCD-GGH Document 11 Filed 06/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 6/10/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

neum2518.fta

Case 2:04-cv-02518-FCD-GGH Document 11 Filed 06/13/05 Page 2 of 2