Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-01670/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-01670-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 In its request, Ariba erroneously requested twice that Exhibit 21 be filed under seal. 

A review of the exhibits submitted in hard copy to the Court make clear that one of these

exhibits, Deposition Exhibit 47 (Bates numbers ARIBA00002834-2843), is actually Exhibit

4 to the Gallo Declaration.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEORIS DE MEXICO, S.A. De C.V.,

formerly known as CEMTEC, S.A., DE C.V.,

Plaintiff and CounterDefendant,

 v.

ARIBA INC,

Defendant and CounterClaimant.

 /

No. C 02-01670 JSW

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND RESERVING IN PART

DEFENDANT ARIBA, INC.’S

REQUEST TO FILE

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

On December 13, 2005, defendant Ariba, Inc. (“Ariba”) filed a request to file under seal

exhibits 3, 4,1 9-12, 21, 26, and 27 attached to the Declaration of Michael L. Gallo in support of

its Motions in Limine. Ariba established good cause to file under seal exhibits 4, 9-12, 21, 26,

and 27. As to these documents, the request is GRANTED. 

The Court RESERVES ruling on exhibit 3. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 79-5(d), when

a party files a motion to file a document under seal that has been designated as confidential by

another party, the designating party must file within five days of the motion to seal a declaration

establishing that the designated information is sealable, or must withdraw the designation of

Case 3:02-cv-01670-JSW Document 348 Filed 12/14/05 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

confidentiality. If the designating party fails to file the required declaration, the documents will

be made part of the public record. Civ. L.R. 79-5(d). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 14, 2005 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:02-cv-01670-JSW Document 348 Filed 12/14/05 Page 2 of 2