Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02406/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02406-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CMC

CASE NO.: C06-24-6 MJJ

P:\CLIENTS\GLACL\Franks Glass\Pleadings\Request for Continuance of CMC 021207.DOC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN: 124607)

Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN: 172509)

SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION

120 Howard Street, Suite 520

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 882-7900

Facsimile: (415) 882-9287

mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com

mstafford@sjlawcorp.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs,

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GLAZIERS,

et al. PENSION PLAN, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GLAZIERS, 

ARCHITECTURAL METAL AND GLASS 

WORKERS PENSION PLAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOHN CORTEZ dba FRANK’S GLASS,

Defendant.

Case No.: C 06-2406 MJJ

PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR

CONTINUANCE OF CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

Date: February 20, 2007

Time: 2:00 p.m.

(PROPOSED) ORDER

Plaintiffs again submit a Request for Continuance of the Case Management Conference 

currently scheduled for February 20, 2007 at 2:00 p.m., to allow them to file a Motion for Default 

Judgment.

1. The complaint in this action was filed on April 6, 2006 to compel defendant to 

allow plaintiffs to audit its records in accordance with its collective bargaining agreement, and for 

payment of any amount found due upon audit.

2. The Defendants did not make an appearance in this action, but agreed to an 

audit date of July 17, 2006. Plaintiffs therefore requested, and the Court ordered, that the Case 

Management Conference set for July 18, 2006 be continued, to October 3, 2006.

Case 3:06-cv-02406-MJJ Document 14 Filed 02/14/07 Page 1 of 2
PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CMC

CASE NO.: C06-24-6 MJJ

P:\CLIENTS\GLACL\Franks Glass\Pleadings\Request for Continuance of CMC 021207.DOC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. On September 20, 2006, the Court vacated that conference and rescheduled it for 

October 17, 2006. The Court then continued that conference to December 19, 2006, to allow 

Plaintiffs’ auditors time to complete their report. 

4. Just prior to that date Plaintiffs’ auditors completed their report, and the Court 

again reset the conference date, to February 20, 2007, to allow the report to be sent to Defendant 

for a 10 day review or response, followed by billing for payment to be made. 

5. The audit report, then billing, was sent to Defendant’s accountant, with whom the 

auditors dealt. In the absence of any response the billing was again sent, directly to Defendant, 

with a response date of February 5, 2007. There has been no response and no payment of the 

amounts found due on audit.

6. Plaintiffs therefore again request a continuance of the Case Management 

Conference for a period of approximately 60 days to allow for their preparation and service of a

Motion for Default Judgment.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: February 12, 2007 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION

By: ________________/s/________________

Muriel B. Kaplan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER

The Case Management Conference scheduled in this matter for February 20, 2007, at 2:00 

p.m. is hereby continued to at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________________ ________________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

April 24, 2007 02/14/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

Case 3:06-cv-02406-MJJ Document 14 Filed 02/14/07 Page 2 of 2