Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03440/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03440-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 12:22 Securities Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ENLARGEMENT OF TIME C 06-3440 JF (PVT)

SARAH A. GOOD (No. 148742)

Email: sgood@howardrice.com

JIN H. KIM (No. 208676)

Email: jkim@howardrice.com

JASON S. TAKENOUCHI (No. 234835)

Email: jtakenouchi@howardrice.com

REBECCA M. KAHAN (No. 244423)

Email: rkahan@howardrice.com

HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY

FALK & RABKIN

A Professional Corporation

Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4024

Telephone: 415/434-1600

Facsimile: 415/217-5910

Attorneys for Defendants

JUNG-HERNG CHANG, PETER JEN, GERRY

LIU, JOHN LUKE, AMIR MASHKOORI,

W. STEVEN ROWE and specially appearing for

YASUSHI CHIKAGAMI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

In re TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.,

DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

ALL ACTIONS

No. C 06-3440 JF (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

ENLARGING TIME FOR INDIVIDUAL

DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSES TO

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel

**E-filed 5/29/07** --------------

Case 5:06-cv-03440-JF Document 57 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ENLARGEMENT OF TIME C 06-3440 JF (PVT)

-1-

WHEREAS, lead plaintiffs Viken Kalindjian and Gerald W. Keeney (“Lead Plaintiffs”)

filed their First Amended Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint (“Amended Complaint”) on

March 7, 2007 against Trident Microsystems, Inc. (“Trident” or “Company”) and certain former

and current officers and directors of the Company (“Individual Defendants”);

WHEREAS, by the parties’ stipulation and Court order dated March 22, 2007, Individual

Defendants’ responses to the Amended Complaint are due 45 days after the Company’s filing of

any response other than a motion to dismiss for failure to plead that making a demand would have

been futile;

WHEREAS, Trident filed on April 30, 2007 a Motion to Stay Action Pending Evaluation

of Shareholder Derivative Claims by Special Litigation Committee (“Motion to Stay”) with a

hearing date of July 20, 2007;

WHEREAS, Individual Defendants and Lead Plaintiffs agree that it would promote judicial

economy to have the Motion to Stay heard and resolved before Individual Defendants are required

to file any responses to the Amended Complaint;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned, subject to

the approval of the Court, that Individual Defendants shall have up to and including forty-five (45)

days after notice of the Court’s order denying Trident’s Motion to Stay to file their responses to the

Amended Complaint. In the event the Court grants Trident’s Motion to Stay, Individual Defendants

shall have up to and including forty-five (45) days after notice of the Court’s order lifting such a stay

to file their responses to the Amended Complaint.

Case 5:06-cv-03440-JF Document 57 Filed 05/29/07 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ENLARGEMENT OF TIME C 06-3440 JF (PVT)

-2-

DATED: May 25, 2007. SARAH A. GOOD

JIN H. KIM

JASON S. TAKENOUCHI

REBECCA M. KAHAN

HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK &

RABKIN

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/

JIN H. KIM

Attorneys for Defendants JUNG-HERNG CHANG,

PETER JEN, GERRY LIU, JOHN LUKE, AMIR

MASHKOORI, W. STEVEN ROWE and specially

appearing for YASUSHI CHIKAGAMI

DATED: May 25, 2007. CHARLES J. LANDY

WALTER J. ROBINSON

THOMAS G. ALLEN

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

By: /s/

WALTER J. ROBINSON

Attorneys for Defendant JOHN S. EDMUNDS

DATED: May 25, 2007. JEFFREY S. FACTER

JUSTIN S. CHANG

SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP

By: /s/

JUSTIN S. CHANG

Attorneys for Defendant FRANK C. LIN

Case 5:06-cv-03440-JF Document 57 Filed 05/29/07 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ENLARGEMENT OF TIME C 06-3440 JF (PVT)

-3-

DATED: May 25, 2007. SHAWN A. WILLIAMS

MONIQUE C. WINKLER

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN

& ROBBINS LLP

By: /s/

MONIQUE C. WINKLER

ERIC L. ZAGAR

ROBIN WINCHESTER

JAMES A. MARO

SCHIFFRIN BARROWAY TOPAZ

& KESSLER, LLP

Attorneys for LEAD PLAINTIFFS

DATED: May 25, 2007. DANIEL J. BERGESON

HWAY-LING HSU

BERGESON, LLP

By: /s/

HWAY-LING HSU

Attorneys for Defendants GLEN A. ANTLE and

MILLARD PHELPS

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __________, 2007.

By:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5/29 JEREMY FOGEL

Case 5:06-cv-03440-JF Document 57 Filed 05/29/07 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ENLARGEMENT OF TIME C 06-3440 JF (PVT)

-4-

I, JIN H. KIM, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR INDIVIDUAL

DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSES TO AMENDED COMPLAINT. In compliance with

General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that WALTER J. ROBINSON, JUSTIN S. CHANG,

MONIQUE WINKLER and HWAY-LING HSU have concurred in this filing.

DATED: May 25, 2007.

By: /s/

JIN H. KIM

Case 5:06-cv-03440-JF Document 57 Filed 05/29/07 Page 5 of 5