Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00464/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00464-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James Michael Morgan, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Maricopa County Adult Probation Dept.,

et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-12-00464-PHX-ROS

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf’s Report and

Recommendation. (Doc. 16). Neither party filed objections.

A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has

filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the district

court’s review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are

filed, the district court need not conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp.

2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo

review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.”)

(internal quotations and citations omitted). Because no objections were filed, the report and

recommendation will be adopted in full.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is ADOPTED in full.

Case 2:12-cv-00464-ROS Document 18 Filed 10/11/12 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff’s equal protection claims are DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service on Defendants MCAPD, Broderick,

Thompson, and Johnson be made and they must respond to the First Amended Complaint.

The Court directs the following:

(1) The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a service packet including both

summons and request for waiver forms for said Defendants.

(2) Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of the Court

within 20 days of the date of the filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not

provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order.

(3) The United States Marshal shall retain the Summons, a copy of such amended

complaint, and a copy of this Order for future use.

(4) The United States Marshal shall notify said Defendants of the commencement of

this action and request waiver of service of the summons pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure. The notice to Defendants shall include a copy of this Order. The

Marshal shall file waivers of service of the summons or requests for waivers that were

returned as undeliverable as soon as they are received. If a waiver of service of summons

is not returned by Defendants within thirty days from the date the request for waiver was sent

by the Marshal, the Marshal shall:

a. Personally serve copies of the Summons, such amended Complaint and this Order

upon Defendants pursuant to Rule 4(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

b. Within ten days after personal service is effected, file the return of service for the

Defendants, along with evidence of the attempt to secure a waiver of service of the summons

and of the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service upon the Defendants. The costs

of service shall be enumerated on the return of service form (USM-285) and shall include the

costs incurred by the Marshal for photocopying additional copies of the Summons, such

amended complaint, or this Order and for preparing new process receipt and return forms

(USM-285), if required. Costs of service will be taxed against the personally served

Case 2:12-cv-00464-ROS Document 18 Filed 10/11/12 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

Defendant pursuant to Rule 4(d)(2) and (5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless

otherwise ordered by the Court.

(5) Defendants who agree to waive service of the Summons and such amended

complaint shall return signed waiver forms to the United State Marshal, and not to Plaintiff.

(6) Said Defendants shall answer such amended complaint or otherwise respond by

appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(7) Any answer or responsive pleading shall state the specific Defendant(s) by name

on whose behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, responsive pleading, or other

motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant(s) by name on whose behalf

it is filed.

DATED this 11th day of October, 2012.

Case 2:12-cv-00464-ROS Document 18 Filed 10/11/12 Page 3 of 3