Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04187/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04187-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

14-cv-04187-RMW

ORDER RE MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

BRAD GREENSPAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

IAC/INTERACTIVECORP, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-04187-RMW 

ORDER RE MOTION TO SET ASIDE 

JUDGMENT

Dkt. No. 39

This case was dismissed with prejudice for failure to diligently prosecute on May 15, 2015. 

Dkt. No. 29. Judgment was entered on the same day. Dkt. No. 30. On July 1, 2015, plaintiff

moved to set aside the judgment. Dkt. No. 39. On September 18, 2015, this court held a hearing on 

plaintiff’s motion. Dkt. No. 67. After the hearing, the court deferred ruling on plaintiff’s motion, 

indicating that the court would grant relief from judgment once plaintiff 1) obtained new class 

counsel and 2) reimbursed defendants for costs and expenses incurred following entry of 

judgment. Dkt. No. 66. 

New counsel for plaintiff filed a notice of appearance on November 2, 2015. On November 

10, 2015, the court issued an order setting reimbursement amount of $20,000 for Google and 

$25,000 for IAC. Dkt. No. 83. In the order, the court instructed plaintiff to file a declaration 

attesting that payment had been made within five days of making the payments. Id. The court

Case 5:14-cv-04187-RMW Document 84 Filed 03/15/16 Page 1 of 2
2

14-cv-04187-RMW

ORDER RE MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

anticipated that payment would be made within a reasonable time. However, it has been over four 

months, and no payment has been made. 

Unless plaintiff makes the required payments by March 25, 2016, the court will conclude 

that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with reimbursement and will no longer be willing to set 

aside the judgment. If plaintiff does not make the required payments by March 25, 2016, 

plaintiff’s motion will be denied and the default judgment will stand. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2016

______________________________________

Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-04187-RMW Document 84 Filed 03/15/16 Page 2 of 2