Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00528/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00528-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM J. WHITSITT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0528 JAM DAD PS

v.

CITY OF TRACY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, William Whitsitt, is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma

pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The case was referred to the undersigned in accordance

with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

By order filed August 9, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to submit to the United States

Marshal a properly completed USM-285 form, a properly completed summons form, and the

number of copies of the endorsed complaint and of the August 9, 2011 order required by the

United States Marshal. (Doc. No. 9 at 2.) Plaintiff was provided the address and phone number

for the United States Marshals Service. Plaintiff was further ordered that within ten days after

submitting the required materials to the United States Marshals Service, plaintiff was to file with

this court a declaration stating the date on which he submitted the required documents to the

United States Marshal. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file the declaration in a timely manner

1

Case 2:10-cv-00528-JAM-AC Document 10 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

may result in an order imposing appropriate sanctions. The forty-day period for plaintiff’s action

has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections

to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal

the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 7, 2011.

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.pro se\whitsitt0528.dism.f&rs

2

Case 2:10-cv-00528-JAM-AC Document 10 Filed 10/11/11 Page 2 of 2