Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01831/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01831-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT P. AMATRONE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-1831 MCE DAD PS

vs.

STEVE MESSINA, et al., 

ORDER

Defendants.

 /

This matter came before the court on July 16, 2010, for hearing of defendants’

June 15, 2010 motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for summary adjudication. 

Plaintiff Robert P. Amatrone, proceeding with this action pro se, appeared on his own behalf. 

Deborah J. Fox, Esq. appeared on behalf of the City of Benicia defendants.

For the reasons stated in open court, the undersigned denied plaintiff’s unnoticed

motion to remove Deborah Fox as one of defendants’ attorneys of record and overruled

plaintiff’s objection to defendants’ summary judgment motion. The hearing of defendants’

motion was continued, as set forth below.

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to remove Deborah Fox as an attorney of record (Doc. No.

44) is denied;

Case 2:08-cv-01831-MCE -DAD Document 47 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Plaintiff’s untimely objections to defendants’ motion for summary judgment

(Doc. No. 45) are overruled;

3. The hearing of defendants’ motion for summary judgment or, in the

alternative, for summary adjudication (Doc. No. 35) is continued to September 3, 2010, at 10:00

a..m. before the undersigned with telephonic appearance authorised;

4. Plaintiff’s opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment or

summary adjudication shall be filed and served on or before August 13, 2010; the filing must be

titled “Opposition,” must include proof of service on defendants’ counsel, and must comply fully

with the requirements of Local Rule 260(b); and

5. Any reply to plaintiff’s opposition shall be filed and served on or before

August 23, 2010.

DATED: July 16, 2010.

DAD:kw

Ddad1\orders.prose\amatrone1831.oah.071610

Case 2:08-cv-01831-MCE -DAD Document 47 Filed 07/19/10 Page 2 of 2