Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01409/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01409-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JASON MARCEL DAVIS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:19-cv-1409-TLN-EFB P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On December 16, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A. The court found service appropriate as to defendant Fields, and granted plaintiff 

thirty days to either return documents necessary to effect service of process on that defendant, or 

to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in the other claims. ECF No. 8. 

The order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this 

action be dismissed. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not submitted the 

appropriate materials necessary for service or an amended complaint. 

 Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED. Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(b); E. D. Cal. Local Rule 110. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:19-cv-01409-TLN-EFB Document 11 Filed 01/29/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: January 29, 2020. 

Case 2:19-cv-01409-TLN-EFB Document 11 Filed 01/29/20 Page 2 of 2