Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05077/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05077-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOUIS FRANCIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

H.L. BRYANT, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 04 5077 REC SMS P 

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RETURN

TO THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Doc.

103) 

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO

OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

(Doc. 104.) 

Louis Frances (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 15,2006, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause why the Motion to

Dismiss for failure to exhaust should not be granted. Pending at the time was a Motion for

Sanctions filed by Plaintiff on December 6, 2006, and Opposed by Defendants on December 19,

2006. Plaintiff field a Motion to extend time to respond to Defendant’s Opposition on January 3,

2007. 

Good cause having been presented, the Court HEREBY ORDERS: 

1. Plaintiff’s Requests for extension of time to file a Return to the Order to Show

Case 1:04-cv-05077-LJO -SMS Document 105 Filed 01/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Cause and Reply to the Opposition to Motion for Sanctions are GRANTED. 

Plaintiff shall file the Return and Reply within thirty (30) days of the date of

service of this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05077-LJO -SMS Document 105 Filed 01/10/07 Page 2 of 2