Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-03031/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-03031-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

PD.26966823.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

Elisabeth A. Madden (SBN 131172) 

emadden@maddenlynch.com 

LAW OFFICES OF MADDEN & LYNCH PC 

505 Sansome Street, Suite 1200 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 851-5900 

Direct Dial: (415) 273-2381 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FleetCor Technologies Operating Company, LLC 

(incorrectly sued as FleetCor Technologies) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALISA RUSSO, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, a business 

entity form unknown and DOES 1-50, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: 4:19-cv-03031-HSG 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

FOR STANDARD LITIGATION 

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, 

proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use 

for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties 

hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 

acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 

discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 

information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 

The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective 

Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth 

the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks 

permission from the court to file material under seal. 

Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 1 of 13
Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 2 of 13
Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 3 of 13
Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 4 of 13
Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 5 of 13
Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 6 of 13
Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 7 of 13
Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 8 of 13
Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 9 of 13
Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 10 of 13
Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 11 of 13
2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20 

21

22

23

24 

25

26

27

28

trial exhibits, expert reports. attorney work produd. and consultam and expert work product. even if

such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute

Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).

IT IS SO STIPULATED. THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

DATED: -�</ )j) /Jo/ o/ 1-r-'---1-7 __;:;;;____,_-1-, --

DATED://).],/. ---------- �O/q �l� 

Elisabeth Madd�n

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ---------- United States District Judge

12

l't>.26966823. I 

11/4/2019

Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 12 of 13
Case 4:19-cv-03031-HSG Document 25 Filed 11/04/19 Page 13 of 13