Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00985/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00985-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION SCHEDULE AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE Case No. CV-08-0985-MHP

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

THERESA L. MUELLER, State Bar #172681

Chief Energy and Telecommunications Deputy 

WILLIAM K. SANDERS, State Bar #154156 

THOMAS J. LONG, State Bar #124776

Deputy City Attorneys 

City Hall, Room 234 

1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place 

San Francisco, California 94102-4682 

Telephone: (415) 554-6548 

Facsimile: (415) 554-4757 

E-Mail: thomas.long@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendants 

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and 

THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, 

INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO and THE DEPARTMENT 

OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE CITY OF 

SAN FRANCISCO, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. CV-08-0985-MHP 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

MOTION SCHEDULE AND 

[PROPOSED[ ORDER CONTINUING 

CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff NextG Networks of California, Inc. (“NextG”) filed a Motion for 

Judgment on the Pleadings on April 3, 2008 and noticed the motion for a hearing on May 12, 2008; 

and 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:08-cv-00985-MHP Document 12 Filed 04/25/08 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION SCHEDULE AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE Case No. CV-08-0985-MHP

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Defendants the City and County of San Francisco and the Department of Public 

Works (“the City”) informed NextG that, in response to the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, 

Defendants intend to file a Motion for Summary Judgment; 

WHEREAS, the Court has set a Case Management Conference (CMC) for May 19, 2008, and 

the parties agree that judicial economy would be served if the CMC were postponed until after the 

resolution of these potentially case-dispositive motions; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 

(1) No later than April 28, 2008, Defendants will file their Motion for Summary 

Judgment; 

(2) No later than May 2, 2008, Plaintiff may, if it so elects, file a Cross-Motion for 

Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff will indicate whether it still wishes its Motion for Judgment on the 

Pleadings to be heard; 

(3) No later than May 16, 2008, Defendants will file their papers in opposition to the 

pending motion(s) submitted by Plaintiff, and Plaintiff will file its papers in opposition to 

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 

(4) No later than May 23, 2008, both parties will file reply papers in support of their 

pending motions; and 

(5) On June 9, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. in the Courtroom of the Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel, 

all pending motions will be heard. 

(6) The parties respectfully submit that the Case Management Conference should be 

continued to a date to be determined by the Court after the June 9, 2008 hearing, and so request. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:08-cv-00985-MHP Document 12 Filed 04/25/08 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION SCHEDULE AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE Case No. CV-08-0985-MHP

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: April 24, 2008 DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

THERESA L. MUELLER 

Chief Energy and Telecommunications Deputy 

WILLIAM K. SANDERS 

THOMAS J. LONG 

Deputy City Attorneys 

By: /S/ 

THOMAS J. LONG 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: April 24, 2008 MARTIN L. FINEMAN 

SUZANNE TOLLER 

T. SCOTT THOMPSON 

JOHN R. EASTBURG 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

By: /S/ 

MARTIN L. FINEMAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NextG Networks of California, Inc. 

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall 

follow the briefing schedule described above and that the Case Management Conference currently 

scheduled for May 19, 2008 be continued to a date to be determined by the Court after June 9, 2008. 

Dated: __________________________________ 

The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

United States District Judge 

4/28/2008

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:08-cv-00985-MHP Document 12 Filed 04/25/08 Page 3 of 3