Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05588/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05588-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1. 

37202B.DOC 6611-00 Case No. 07-5588 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Lee S. Harris (SBN 76699) 

Michael W. Flynn (SBN 247501) 

GOLDSTEIN, GELLMAN, MELBOSTAD, GIBSON & HARRIS, LLP 

1388 Sutter Street, Suite 1000 

San Francisco, CA 94109-5494 

Telephone: (415) 673-5600 

Facsimile: (415) 673-5606 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

SEAN MICHAEL CARTER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA- SAN FRANCISCO 

SEAN MICHAEL CARTER 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

K&K INSURANCE GROUP, INC., dba 

SPECIALTY BENEFITS ADMINISTRATOR, 

INC.; NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY; AON 

CORPORATION; and DOES 1 through 100, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 07 5588 CRB 

Stipulation to extend time for filing of 

Opposition and Reply briefs for K&K’s 

Motion to Dismiss

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, the parties hereby submit a Stipulated Request for 

Order Changing Time. Defendant K&K’s motion to dismiss is scheduled for hearing on January 18, 

2008. Thus, Plaintiff’s Opposition brief to Defendant K&K’s Motion to Dismiss is due December 28, 

2007, and the Reply brief is due January 4, 2008. 

The parties stipulate to extend those filing deadlines by 5 days such that the Opposition brief is 

now due on January 2, 2008, and the Reply brief is now due on January 9, 2008. 

The reason for this enlargement of time to file Opposition and Reply briefs is that the parties 

are on the verge of a settlement, which would render K&K’s motion moot. The parties have engaged 

in good faith efforts to effect this settlement, but due to various holiday travel schedules of the 

attorneys and parties involved, the settlement could not be finalized. The additional 5 days will permit 

Case 3:07-cv-05588-CRB Document 30 Filed 01/02/08 Page 1 of 3
 

 2. 

37202B.DOC 6611-00 Case No. 07-5588 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the parties to finalize this settlement and to enter a mutual dismissal of the case. 

No previous time modifications have been made in this case. 

If the Court grants the requested time change, there would be no effect on the schedule for the 

case. The hearing would still take place on January 18, 2008. 

It is so stipulated: 

 ___________/s/_______________

 Michael W. Flynn 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 

 ___________/s/_______________

 Bess Kennedy 

 Attorney for Defendant K&K 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

 ____________________________ 

 The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

Dated: January 2, 2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:07-cv-05588-CRB Document 30 Filed 01/02/08 Page 2 of 3
 

 3. 

37202B.DOC 6611-00 Case No. 07-5588 

1 

3 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

4 

I, Michael Flynn, declare: 

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law before this Court, and am an attorney for Plaintiff 

Sean Michael Carter. 

2. The reason for this enlargement of time to file Opposition and Reply briefs is that the parties 

are on the verge of a settlement, which would render K&K’s motion moot. The parties have 

engaged in good faith efforts to effect this settlement, but due to various holiday travel 

schedules of the attorneys and parties involved, the settlement could not be finalized. The 

additional 5 days will permit the parties to finalize this settlement and to enter a mutual 

dismissal of the case. 

3. No previous time modifications have been made in this case. 

4. If the Court grants the requested time change, there would be no effect on the schedule for the 

case. The hearing would still take place on January 18, 2008. 

5. I declare under penalty of perjury under the Laws of the State of California that the foregoing 

is true and correct, that if called upon I could competently testify thereto, and that this 

declaration was executed at San Francisco, California, on December 28 , 2007. 

 ___________/s/_______________

 Michael W. Flynn 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 3:07-cv-05588-CRB Document 30 Filed 01/02/08 Page 3 of 3