Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00303/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00303-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Williams v. City of Oakland, et al. (C-06-0303-EDL)

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER P009.STIP

Russell A. Robinson, 163937

Law Office of Russell A. Robinson

345 Grove Street, First Floor

San Francisco CA 94102

TEL: 415.255.0462

FAX: 415.431.4526

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GREG WILLIAMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREG WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-06-0303-EDL

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

ORDER

Date: June 27, 2006

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Courtroom: 15th Floor, Courtroom E

[Jury Trial Demanded]

The parties hereto, through counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. All named Defendants have been served.

2. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

Rule 12(b)(6). Due to calendar conflicts and unavailability of Plaintiff's counsel for the month of

July 2006, the motion has been calendared for hearing on August 29, 2006.

3. Counsel for Defendants was recently informed of the Case Management

Conference date and is not available to attend the Conference on June 27, 2006 due to an

unavoidable scheduling conflict.

/ / /

Case 3:06-cv-00303-EDL Document 14 Filed 06/21/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Williams v. City of Oakland, et al. (C-06-0303-EDL)

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER - 2 - P009.STIP

4. Good cause exists for a continuance. In addition to unavailability of the parties'

counsel as stated above, matters related to the action's case management are pending in the

FRCP Rule 12(b)(6) motion presently scheduled to be heard on August 29, 2006, at 9:00 a.m.

Counsel have met and conferred as required and agree that it would serve judicial economy to

have the Case Management Conference take place following the hearing on the motion.

5. The parties therefore stipulate and request an Order from this Court, that the Case

Management Conference in this matter be continued to August 29, 2006, at 10:00 a.m.

Date: June __, 2006 Law Office of Russell A. Robinson, PC

 /s/ Russell A. Robinson

By: Russell A. Robinson

Attorney for Plaintiff

GREG WILLIAMS

Date: June __, 2006 JOHN A. RUSSO, City Attorney 

RACHEL WAGNER, Supervising Trial Attorney 

INÉS VARGAS FRAENKEL, Deputy City Attorney 

CHRISTOPHER KEE, Deputy City Attorney 

 /s/ 

By: INÉS VARGAS FRAENKEL

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF OAKLAND, OAKLAND FIRE DEPARTMENT

and CARTER

Case 3:06-cv-00303-EDL Document 14 Filed 06/21/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Williams v. City of Oakland, et al. (C-06-0303-EDL)

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER - 3 - P009.STIP

ORDER

Good cause appearing,

It is hereby ordered that upon stipulation of the parties the case management conference

in this matter shall be continued to August 29, 2006, at ____________, in Courtroom E. The

parties are ordered to file a joint statement on or before ____________.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: __________________ 

HONORABLE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

Mag. Judge, USDC, Northern Dist. Of Cal.

10:00 a.m.

August 22, 2006. June 21, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:06-cv-00303-EDL Document 14 Filed 06/21/06 Page 3 of 3