Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00751/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00751-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Hookano v WAMU Proposed Order Re Hrg. On Motion Case No.2:08-CV-00751 LKK JFM

Thomas E. Ho’okano, No. 52477

LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS E. HO’OKANO

2170 Promontory Point Lane

Gold River, California 95670

Telephone: (916) 706-3354

Facsimile: (916) 706-2004 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Sandra D. Hookano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SANDRA D. HOOKANO

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Inc., 

a Washington State Corporation, JANIS

WATSON, an individual, FDIC -R, as

receiver for Defendant Washington

Mutual Bank, JP MORGAN CHASE

BANK, CALIFORNIA

RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, DOES

1-50,

Defendants

/

Case No. 2:08-CV-00751 LKK JFM

ORDER ALLOWING THE

CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING

ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT

AND ADJUSTING THE BRIEFING

SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO THE

STIPULATION OF COUNSEL. 

The Court has reviewed the Stipulation of Counsel Continuing The Hearing On

Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Second Amended Complaint And Extending The

Briefing Schedule Pursuant To Local Rule 143. The Court now issues its Order as

follows:

The hearing on Defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank and California Reconveyance

Company’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Verified Complaint shall be

continued from August 30, 2010 at 10:00 a.m to September 13, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in

Courtroom 4. The briefing schedule in regard defendants’ motion shall be adjusted in

Case 2:08-cv-00751-LKK -JFM Document 70 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Hookano v WAMU Proposed Order Re Hrg. On Motion Case No.2:08-CV-00751 LKK JFM - 2 -

accordance with the local rules with the due dates for plaintiff’s opposition and

defendants’ reply brief, if any, calculated from the September 13, 2010 continued hearing

date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: August 13, 2010

Case 2:08-cv-00751-LKK -JFM Document 70 Filed 08/13/10 Page 2 of 2