Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08119/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08119-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 The instant motion also improperly requests that the Court dismiss the complaint

with prejudice, relief not available under Rule 12(e). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e).

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kendel Jensen, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

Kelley Douglas, et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-8119-PCT-SMM

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Brett Harris’s (“Defendant”) Motion for More

Definite Statement (Dkt. 17). A motion for a more definite statement “must be made

before filing a responsive pleading . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e). Defendant filed a

responsive pleading—his answer to the complaint—three months before filing the Motion

for a More Definite Statement. (Dkt. 5, Def.’s Answer.) The motion will therefore be

denied.1

 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying Defendant’s Motion for a More Definite

Statement (Dkt. 17).

DATED this 4th day of September, 2008.

Case 3:07-cv-08119-SMM Document 26 Filed 09/04/08 Page 1 of 1