Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_07-cv-00272/USCOURTS-azd-4_07-cv-00272-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Maria Diamantoulis, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Qwest Communications, Inc.

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-272-TUC-FRZ (JCG)

ORDER

Pending before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge recommending that the Court grant Defendant Quest Communications,

Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Guerin for pretrial proceedings

and report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)

and LRCiv 72.1 and LRCiv 72.2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona, Local Rules of Civil Procedure.

Magistrate Judge Guerin issued her Report and Recommendation on July 1, 2010,

recommending that this Court, after an independent review of the record, grant summary

judgment in favor of Defendant Qwest Communications and dismiss this action with

prejudice.

Before the Court for review, in addition to the Report and Recommendation,

Plaintiff’s objections thereto and Defendant’s response to the objections, are Defendant’s

motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff’s response in opposition and Defendant’s reply. 

Case 4:07-cv-00272-FRZ Document 67 Filed 09/30/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Report and Recommendation includes a thorough history and factual background

of the adverse actions at issue and an in-depth analysis of the legal issues and authority

presented. 

Magistrate Judge Guerin specifically found that Defendant is entitled to summary

judgment on Plaintiff’s claim for gender discrimination because, even though the actions

complained of by Plaintiff may constitute adverse employment actions under controlling law,

Defendant has articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for those actions which

Plaintiff has failed to prove are a pretext for discrimination.

In regard to Plaintiff’s claim of retaliation, Magistrate Judge Guerin also found that

Defendant articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for denying Plaintiff overtime

and failing to provide a light duty assignment in the office and Plaintiff has failed to

demonstrate that those stated reasons are pretextual, and thus, Plaintiff has failed to

demonstrate a genuine issue of fact with respect to her retaliation claim.

Plaintiff filed her objections to the Report and Recommendation, disputing the

findings of the Magistrate Judge, and contend, summarily, that the “legitimate reasons” for

the Defendant’s actions do not withstand scrutiny and that Magistrate Judge Guerin applied

the incorrect analysis in her determinations. 

The Court finds, after careful consideration of the matters presented and an

independent review of the record herein, including Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate’s

Report and Recommendation and Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Objections to

Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation, that Plaintiff has failed to prove a pretext for

discrimination and to demonstrate genuine issues of material fact with respect to her claim

of retaliation, and that Defendant’s are accordingly entitled to summary judgment as a matter

of law.

Based on the foregoing, 

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Guerin’s Report and Recommendation [Doc.

64] is hereby ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law

by this Court;

Case 4:07-cv-00272-FRZ Document 67 Filed 09/30/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Qwest’s Motion for Summary Judgment

[Doc. 58] is GRANTED; Judgment shall enter accordingly. 

DATED this 30th day of September, 2010.

Case 4:07-cv-00272-FRZ Document 67 Filed 09/30/10 Page 3 of 3