Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

AMENDED STIP. & ORDER RE DAMAGES 

DISCOVERY SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 02-3378 JSW 

LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB No. 054283) 

 e-mail: lpasahow@fenwick.com 

J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148) 

 e-mail: dhadden@fenwick.com 

DARREN E. DONNELLY (CSB No. 194335) 

 e-mail: ddonnelly@fenwick.com 

CAROLYN CHANG (CSB No. 217933) 

 e-mail: cchang@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center, 801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, a 

Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA 

INTEGRATION, INC., formerly known as 

ACTA TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendant. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case No. C 02-03378 JSW 

AMENDED STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DAMAGES 

DISCOVERY SCHEDULE 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 222 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

AMENDED STIP. & ORDER RE DAMAGES 

DISCOVERY SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 02-3378 JSW 

Opening expert reports on damages are currently scheduled to be due on May31, 2006, 

with rebuttal expert reports scheduled to be due on June 21, 2006. Informatica only just took the 

deposition of BODI pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) on May 26, 2006. In addition, BODI is still in the 

process of identifying a 30(b)(6) witness to speak on topics relating to BODI’s finances, which is 

highly relevant to a damages analysis. Informatica is entitled to depose BODI before preparation 

and exchange of its opening damages expert report. Also, Informatica is currently still producing 

documents relevant to damages, and is investigating the availability of a 30(b)(6) witness to 

testify on damages topics designated by BODI. BODI is entitled to depose Informatica before 

preparation and exchange of its opening damages expert report. As both parties are still engaging 

in damages discovery, the parties have agreed to extend the dates for the damages expert report, 

with a corresponding extension for damages discovery cut-off. The schedule for dispositive 

motions remains unchanged. The parties hereby respectfully request the Court adopt the schedule 

set forth below. 

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), attached hereto is a Declaration of Carolyn 

Chang setting forth (i) the reasons for the requested enlargement, (ii) a disclosure of all previous 

modifications in the case, and (iii) a description of the effect of the requested time modification 

on the schedule for the case. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel that: 

Event Date 

Parties to comply with Rule 26(a)(2)(B) with respect to 

damages issues on which that party bears the burden of proof 

(“Opening Damages Expert Reports”) 

June 16, 2006 

Parties to comply with Rule 26(a)(2)(B) in rebuttal/opposition 

with respect to damages issues on which the other party bears 

the burden of proof (“Rebuttal Damages Expert Reports”) 

July 7, 2006 

Damages Discovery cut-off July 21, 2006 

Dispositive motions filed June 16, 2006 (unchanged) 

Hearing on dispositive motions August 4, 2006 (unchanged) 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 222 Filed 06/02/06 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

AMENDED STIP. & ORDER RE DAMAGES 

DISCOVERY SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 02-3378 JSW 

2

Dated: May 30, 2006 Respectfully submitted 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Carolyn Chang 

Carolyn Chang 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

Dated: May 30, 2006 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

By: /s/ Robert D. Tadlock 

Robert D. Tadlock 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA INTEGRATION, INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________, 2006 

Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

United States District Court Judge 

Northern District of California 

June 2

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 222 Filed 06/02/06 Page 3 of 3