Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01598/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01598-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL BREINER, No. CIV.S-06-1598 GEB DAD PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

THE REGENTS OF THE

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

dba U.C. DAVIS MEDICAL 

CENTER, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

This matter came before the court on October 13, 2006, for

hearing on the following motions: (1) defendants Regents of the

University of California, Humberto Contreras, Wanda Brown and Rose

Kanta’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

12(b)(6), or in the alternative for a more definite statement, and to

strike punitive damages; and (2) defendants Duane Hicks and Kim

Crawford’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), or in the

alternative for a more definite statement. Becki Graham appeared on

Case 2:06-cv-01598-GEB-DAD Document 28 Filed 10/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

behalf of defendants. There was no appearance on behalf of

plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se. Nor has plaintiff filed any

opposition or other response to defendants’ motions.

Having considered all written materials filed in connection

with the motions, and in light of plaintiff’s failure to appear and

oppose the motions, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff is directed to show cause in writing within

ten (10) days of the date of this order why this matter should not be

dismissed for failure to prosecute.

2. The required writing shall also address why this court

should not grant defendants’ motions to dismiss.

3. The court will issue such further orders as necessary

following plaintiff’s response to this order to show cause.

4. Plaintiff is forewarned that the failure to timely

comply with the terms of this order will result in a recommendation

of dismissal. 

DATED: October 13, 2006.

DAD:th

DDad1/orders.prose/breiner1598.osc

Case 2:06-cv-01598-GEB-DAD Document 28 Filed 10/16/06 Page 2 of 2