Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00630/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00630-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property

---

Stip. and [Proposed] Order Re Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN D. SCHEMA,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-0630-MCE-DAD PS

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND 

TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

The United States filed its motion to dismiss on or about May 27, 2014. (Dkt. No. 9.) Magistrate 

Judge Delaney entered Findings and Recommendations recommending that the Complaint be dismissed. 

(Dkt. No. 23). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations, which were sustained in 

part on September 4, 2014. (Dkt. No. 31). The matter was thereupon re-assigned to Judge Drozd. (See 

id.) Defendants’ response to the Complaint is currently due September 18, 2014. The parties have met 

and conferred to discuss potential resolution, and hereby stipulate that Defendants shall have an extension 

up to and including October 16, 2014, to respond to the Complaint.

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: September 17, 2014 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

/s/ Gregory T. Broderick

GREGORY T. BRODERICK

Assistant United States Attorney

/s/ Robert Wilson (authorized on 09/17/2014)

ROBERT WILSON, 

Attorney for Plaintiff

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

GREGORY T. BRODERICK

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for the United States

Case 2:14-cv-00630-MCE-DAD Document 34 Filed 09/19/14 Page 1 of 2
Stip. and [Proposed] Order Re Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 18, 2014

Ddad1\orders.pro se

schema0630.stip.eot.ord.doc

Case 2:14-cv-00630-MCE-DAD Document 34 Filed 09/19/14 Page 2 of 2