Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-04969/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-04969-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 195
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

 Case No. C-08—04969 JF

Case No. C-09—01649 JF

MEISELMAN, DENLEA, PACKMAN,

CARTON & EBERZ P.C.

JEFFREY I. CARTON (pro hac vice) jcarton@mdpcelaw.com

MICHAEL A. BERG (pro hac vice) mberg@mdpcelaw.com

1311 Mamaroneck Avenue

White Plains, New York 10605

Telephone: (914) 517-5000

Facsimile: (914) 517-5055

CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC

ROBYN C. CROWTHER, State Bar No. 193840 crowther@caldwell-leslie.com

ERIC S. PETTIT, State Bar No. 234657 pettit@caldwell-leslie.com

1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 600

Los Angeles, California 90017-2463

Telephone: (213) 629-9040

Facsimile: (213) 629-9022

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Berenblatt, Personette,

Simpson, Miller and all others similarly situated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

REUBEN BERENBLATT, ANDREW

PERSONETTE, EARL C. SIMPSON, LAURA

MILLER, On behalf of themselves and

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. C-08-04969 JF (PVT)

Case No. C-09-01649 JF (PVT)

STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT

THOMAS WAGNER, SCOTT MEYERS, On

behalf of themselves and all others similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant.

-------------------

Case 5:08-cv-04969-JF Document 81 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

 Case No. C-08—04969 JF

Case No. C-09—01649 JF

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties, by and through their respective

counsel, hereby stipulate and request as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“Second

Amended Complaint”) on September 21, 2009;

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, Defendant’s deadline to

respond to the Second Amended Complaint was extended from October 5, 2009 to

November 5, 2009;

WHEREAS, Defendant moved to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on

November 5, 2009;

WHEREAS, the Court granted Defendant’s motion, with leave to amend as to

Plaintiffs’ claims under the UCL and for unjust enrichment, on April 7, 2010;

WHEREAS, the Court’s April 7, 2010 Order (“Order”) required Plaintiffs to file

any amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of the Order (i.e. May 7, 2010);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Administrative Relief pursuant to Local

Rule 7-11 on April 22, 2010, seeking leave to conduct targeted discovery prior to filing an

amended complaint;

WHEREAS, Defendant filed an Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for

Administrative Relief on April 26, 2010;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the current deadline for Plaintiffs to

file an amended complaint until May 28, 2010;

WHEREAS, the continuance of the deadline to file an amended complaint will not

affect any other deadlines in this action;

Case 5:08-cv-04969-JF Document 81 Filed 05/11/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

 Case No. C-08—04969 JF

Case No. C-09—01649 JF

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, SUBJECT

TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT:

1. Plaintiffs’ deadline to file an amended complaint is extended until May 28, 2010.

Dated: May 5, 2010 Caldwell Leslie & Proctor, PC

By: /s/ Robyn C. Crowther 

Robyn C. Crowther

Dated: May 5, 2010 Girard Gibbs, LLP

By: /s/ Eric H. Gibbs

Eric H. Gibbs

Dated: May 5, 2010 Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC

By: /s/ Douglas J. McNamara

Douglas J. McNamara

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: May 5, 2009 Morrison & Foerster LLP

By: /s/ Andrew D. Muhlbach

Andrew D. Muhlbach

Attorneys for Defendant

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45.1, I, Robyn C. Crowther attest that I

obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatories.

PROPOSED ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May__, 2010

 

 _________________________________

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel

United States District Judge

------------------

6

Case 5:08-cv-04969-JF Document 81 Filed 05/11/10 Page 3 of 3