Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00688/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00688-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

3:17-cv-688-JM-NLS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ATLEY HENRY, LAURA HENRY,

Plaintiff,

v.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:17-cv-688-JM-NLS

ORDER

(1)DENYING AS MOOT JOINT 

MOTION FOR 

DETERMINATION OF 

DISCOVERY DISPUTE NO. 1 

[ECF No. 38]; and 

(2)GRANTING IN PART JOINT 

MOTION TO CONTINUE 

DISCOVERY DISPUTE NO. 1 

[ECF No. 45]

Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Continue Joint Motion for 

Determination of Discovery Dispute No. 1. ECF No. 45. In light of additional 

documents that were located and the pending production which will alter the substance of 

Discovery Dispute No. 1, the parties request the Court defer ruling and grant additional 

time to submit a “supplemental joint statement” on or before April 27, 2018. Id. 

Having reviewed the Discovery Dispute No. 1, the Court finds it contains 

arguments which have been addressed by the entry of a protective order (see ECF No. 44) 

Case 3:17-cv-00688-JM-NLS Document 46 Filed 04/16/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

3:17-cv-688-JM-NLS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and are otherwise rendered moot or modified so significantly as to require revised 

briefing due to the location and pending production of additional documents. 

In light of these circumstances, the Court finds it appropriate to: 

1. DENY AS MOOT the Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute 

No. 1; 

2. GRANT an extension of time until April 27, 2018, for the parties to submit a 

Discovery Dispute regarding Request for Production of Documents (Set One) 

propounded by Laura Henry. This Discovery Dispute, if it cannot be resolved

by the parties following production of documents, shall be filed as Joint Motion 

for Determination of Discovery Dispute No. 3 (or next in order) and must 

remove any arguments previously addressed by the Court in any Order. 

3. The Court will rule on Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute 

No. 3 at its earliest convenience. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 16, 2018

Case 3:17-cv-00688-JM-NLS Document 46 Filed 04/16/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2