Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02448/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02448-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2448

DORA L. ADKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

K. JOCHEM, Police Officer from George Mason University 

Police Department; EMILY ROSS, Sergeant from George Mason 

University Police Department; J. U. AGUILAR, Police Officer 

from George Mason University Police Department,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

CITY OF FAIRFAX - GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY CRIMESOLVERS, 

INC.; THE RECTORS AND VISITORS OF GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY, 

University’s Legal Counsel’s Office.

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:15-cv-00879-JCC-MSN)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-2448 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Dora Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. David Garnett Drummey, GEORGE 

MASON UNIVERSITY, Fairfax, Virginia, Matthew Robert McGuire, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2448 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Dora L. Adkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 

dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Adkins v. Jochem, No. 1:15-cv-00879-JCC-MSN (E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 

2015). We also deny Adkins’ motion for leave to add citations

and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 15-2448 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 3 of 3