Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00520/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00520-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John C. Kiehlmeier, Esq. (SBN: 124083)

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN C. KIEHLMEIER

P. O. Box 1144

Corona del Mar, California 92625

Telephone: (949) 274-4614

Attorney for defendants (see signature page)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

a Pennsylvania corporation,

 Plaintiffs,

vs.

TECH LOGISTICS CORPORATION d/b/a

SYSTEMS LOGISTICS SERVICES, a Texas

corporation; SYSTEMS LOGISTICS, INC.;

AGRI-COMM EXPRESS, INC., a California

corporation; TRUCKING EQUIPMENT

COMPANY, INC., a Wisconsin corporation and

ELISEO ONTIVEROS VALDEZ, an individual,

 Defendants.

_________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: 1:10-CV-00520

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF

TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;

PROPOSED ORDER

[Local Rule 144, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Mark J. Hancock of Sedgwick, Detert,

Moran & Arnold LLP, counsel for Plaintiff ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, (hereinafter

“ACE” or “Plaintiff”), and John C. Kiehlmeier, Esq., Law Offices of John C. Kiehlmeier, counsel for

Defendants TECH LOGISTICS CORPORATION d/b/a SYSTEMS LOGISTICS SERVICES,

SYSTEMS LOGISTICS, INC., AGRI-COMM EXPRESS, INC., TRUCKING EQUIPMENT

COMPANY, INC., and ELISEO ONTIVEROS VALDEZ (hereinafter collectively “Defendants”) , as

 1 

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

[Local Rule 144, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6]

Case 1:10-cv-00520-AWI -MJS Document 15 Filed 04/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

follows:

1. All defendants shall have an extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s complaint up to 

and including May 4, 2010.

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 12, 2010. SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

By: /s/ Mark. J. Hancock

MARK J. HANCOCK, ESQ.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Dated: April 12, 2010. LAW OFFICES OF JOHN C. KIEHLMEIER

By: /s/ John C. Kiehlmeier

JOHN C. KIEHLMEIER, ESQ.

attorney for Defendants,

TECH LOGISTICS CORPORATION d/b/a SYSTEMS

LOGISTICS SERVICES, SYSTEMS LOGISTICS, INC.,

AGRI-COMM EXPRESS, INC., TRUCKING

EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., and ELISEO

ONTIVEROS VALDEZ

ORDER

In accord with the terms of the Stipulation of the parties set forth above, the time for defendants 

TECH LOGISTICS CORPORATION d/b/a SYSTEMS LOGISTICS SERVICES, SYSTEMS

LOGISTICS, INC., AGRI-COMM EXPRESS, INC., TRUCKING EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.,

and ELISEO ONTIVEROS VALDEZ to respond to plaintiff’s complaint on file in the instant matter is

hereby extended up to and including May 4, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 2 

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

[Local Rule 144, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6]

Case 1:10-cv-00520-AWI -MJS Document 15 Filed 04/16/10 Page 2 of 2