Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-01799/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-01799-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

 ORDER 

Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01761-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Vega, et al. No. 14-01762-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Hall, et al. No. 14-01763-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Deebom, et al. No. 14-01764-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Hoyt, et al. No. 14-01765-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Bonorand, et al. No. 14-01766-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01774-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01775-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Forester, et al. No. 14-01776-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Monson, et al. No. 14-01777-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01778-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. State of Arizona, et al. No. 14-01779-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Zevallos, et al. No. 14-01780-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01781-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01782-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01783-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01784-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01785-TUC-RCB 

 

Case 4:14-cv-01799-RCB-PSOT Document 3 Filed 04/11/14 Page 1 of 6
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food 

Servs., et al. No. 14-01786-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Hoyt, et al. No. 14-01787-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Vega, et al. No. 14-01788-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Deebom, et al. No. 14-01798-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. State of Arizona, et al. No. 14-01799-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01800-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Canteen/Trinity Corr. Food 

Servs. Inc., et al. No. 14-01801-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food 

Servs., et al. No. 14-01802-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01803-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01804-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01805-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Hoyt, et al. No. 14-01806-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01807-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01808-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01809-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01810-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food 

Servs., et al. No. 14-01811-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. State of Arizona, et al. No. 14-01812-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01813-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Canteen/Trinity Corr. Food 

Servs. Inc., et al. No. 14-01814-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01815-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01816-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01817-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01818-TUC-RCB 

 

Case 4:14-cv-01799-RCB-PSOT Document 3 Filed 04/11/14 Page 2 of 6
- 3 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01819-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Vega, et al. No. 14-01820-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Canteen/Trinity Corr. Food 

Servs. Inc., et al. No. 14-01821-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. State of Arizona, et al. No. 14-01822-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food 

Servs., et al. No. 14-01823-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01824-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01825-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01826-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Deebom, et al. No. 14-01827-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01828-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01829-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01830-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01831-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01832-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01833-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01834-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01835-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01836-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01837-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01838-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01839-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01840-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01841-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. State of Arizona, et al. No. 14-01842-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food 

Servs., et al. No. 14-01843-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Hoyt, et al. No. 14-01844-TUC-RCB 

Case 4:14-cv-01799-RCB-PSOT Document 3 Filed 04/11/14 Page 3 of 6
- 4 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Maisano v. Hall, et al. No. 14-01845-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01846-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01847-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01848-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01849-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01850-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01851-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Canteen/Trinity Corr. Food 

Servs. Inc., et al. No. 14-01852-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. State of Arizona, et al. No. 14-01853-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food 

Servs., et al. No. 14-01854-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01855-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Hoyt, et al. No. 14-01856-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01857-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01858-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01859-TUC-RCB 

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01860-TUC-RCB 

 With the undersigned’s consent, United States District Court Chief Judge Raner C. 

Collins has directed that the above-captioned cases be reassigned to the undersigned 

pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 42.1(e)(3). 

 Plaintiff Dale Maisano, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison ComplexLewis in Buckeye, Arizona, has so often and egregiously abused the legal process in the 

past that on August 11, 1992, Senior United States District Judge Stephen M. McNamee 

entered an Order and Restraining Order enjoining him from filing any civil action in this 

or any other federal court without first obtaining leave of the court. See August 11, 1992 

Order and Restraining Order in Maisano v. Lewis, CV 92-1026-PHX-SMM (MS). 

 Pursuant to the Restraining Order, to obtain leave to file, Plaintiff must file an 

“Application Pursuant to Court Order Seeking Leave to File” accompanied by an 

Case 4:14-cv-01799-RCB-PSOT Document 3 Filed 04/11/14 Page 4 of 6
- 5 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

affidavit certifying: (1) “that the claim or claims he wishes to present are new and have 

never been raised and disposed of on the merits by any federal court”; and (2) “that to the 

best of his knowledge the claim or claims are not frivolous or taken in bad faith.” 

Additionally, any application seeking leave to file must be accompanied by a copy of the 

August 11, 1992 Order and Restraining Order in Maisano v. Lewis, CV 92-1026-PHXSMM (MS).1

 In addition, Plaintiff “must attach to future complaints a list of all cases 

previously filed involving similar or related causes of action.” “Failure to comply 

strictly with the terms of the [Restraining Order] will be sufficient ground to deny 

leave to file.” (Emphasis added.) 

 Plaintiff lodged a civil rights Complaint (Doc. 1)2

 in each of the above-captioned 

cases. Plaintiff did not file an Application Pursuant to Court Order Seeking Leave to 

File, a copy of the August 11, 1992 Order and Restraining Order, or a list of his 

previously filed cases involving similar or related causes of action. Plaintiff, therefore, 

has failed to comply strictly with the Court-mandated pre-filing requirements. Thus, 

these actions will be dismissed without prejudice. 

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Clerk of Court must reassign these cases to the undersigned pursuant 

to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 42.1(e)(3). 

(2) These cases are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must 

 

1

 Plaintiff appealed the final judgment in CV 92-1026-PHX-SMM (MS) to the 

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On March 17, 1993, the Court lodged a certified copy of the Ninth Circuit’s mandate dismissing the appeal. 

2

 In light of Plaintiff’s history of vexatious litigation and the frequency with which he lodges complaints, the Clerk of Court has been directed to docket only the name of the first named Defendant in each case because entering onto the docket all of the Defendants 

named in each lodged Complaint needlessly wastes the Court’s limited resources. The Clerk of Court has made a notation on the docket that the list of defendants on the docket 

sheet is only a partial list. Similarly, the Clerk of Court has also been directed to cease 

sending Plaintiff a Notice of Assignment in each new case he files because Plaintiff’s 

new lawsuits filed in the Tucson Division of the District of Arizona are initially directly assigned to Chief Judge Collins, see Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.8(e); given his litigation history, Plaintiff is well aware of the warnings contained in the Notice of Assignment; and sending a Notice of Assignment in each of Plaintiff’s new cases wastes 

the Court’s limited resources. 

Case 4:14-cv-01799-RCB-PSOT Document 3 Filed 04/11/14 Page 5 of 6
- 6 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

file this Order in each case, enter judgment accordingly, and close these cases. 

(3) The Clerk of Court must accept no further documents for filing in 

these cases, other than those in furtherance of an appeal. 

DATED this 8th day of April, 2014. 

Case 4:14-cv-01799-RCB-PSOT Document 3 Filed 04/11/14 Page 6 of 6