Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05091/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05091-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLIFTON JEROME McDANIEL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GEORGE ORTIZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:02-cv-05091-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 78)

ORDER GRANTING UNENUMERATED

RULE 12(b) MOTION TO DISMISS

(Doc. 65)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Clifton Jerome McDaniel (“plaintiff”), a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this

civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 25, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

//

Case 1:02-cv-05091-AWI -SMS Document 79 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed January 25,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendant’s unenumerated Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss,

filed March 2, 2005, is GRANTED; and,

3. This action is therefore DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05091-AWI -SMS Document 79 Filed 03/06/06 Page 2 of 2