Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00005/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00005-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PADB 44007495.1 STIPULATION TO RESET HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULES FOR PENDING AND 

ANTICIPATED MOTIONS, AND TO MODIFY PAGE LIMITS, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO: CV 04-0005 MHP (E-FILE) 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

IAN N. FEINBERG (SBN 88324) 

MICHAEL A. MOLANO (SBN 171057) 

JOSHUA M. MASUR (SBN 203510) 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC. 

KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN 71450) 

CHRISTOPHER T. HOLLAND (SBN 164053) 

MICHAEL D. LISI (SBN 196974) 

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP 

114 Sansome Street, 4th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 249-8330 

Facsimile: (415) 249-8333 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE QUEST GROUP, d/b/a AUDIOQUEST 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

THE QUEST GROUP d/b/a AUDIOQUEST, 

 Defendant. 

Civil Action No. CV 04-0005 MHP (E-File) 

STIPULATION TO RESET HEARING 

AND BRIEFING SCHEDULES FOR 

PENDING AND ANTICIPATED 

MOTIONS, AND TO MODIFY PAGE 

LIMITS, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

Case 3:04-cv-00005-MHP Document 73 Filed 05/27/2005 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:04-cv-00005-MHP Document 77 Filed 06/01/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 

STIPULATION TO RESET HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULES FOR PENDING AND 

ANTICIPATED MOTIONS, AND TO MODIFY PAGE LIMITS, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO: CV 04-0005 MHP (E-FILE 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Plaintiff Monster Cable Products, 

Inc. (“Monster Cable”) and Defendant The Quest Group d/b/a AudioQuest (“AudioQuest”), 

through their respective counsel and subject to the approval of this Court, that the briefing and 

hearing schedule set forth below shall apply to the following pending and anticipated motions:

(1) AudioQuest’s Motion for Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication 

of Non-Infringement (“AudioQuest’s Motion”) (Docket No. 59); (2) Monster Cable’s Motion for 

Leave to Amend Its Infringement Claim Charts (“Motion to Amend”)(Docket No. 70); and (3) 

Monster Cable’s anticipated motion for summary judgment or adjudication. The first two 

motions are currently set for hearing on June 27, 2005. The parties have agreed to continue the 

current briefing and hearing schedule for those pending motions so that all of the motions may be 

heard at the same time, thereby conserving the resources of both the Court and the parties.

The parties further stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that the page limit for 

Monster Cable’s anticipated motion for summary judgment or adjudication, and for AudioQuest’s 

opposition thereto, shall be increased to no more than 45 pages, and that the page limit for 

Monster Cable’s reply in support of its motion for summary judgment or adjudication shall be 

increased to no more than 25 pages. These are the same page limits allowed by the Court in 

connection with AudioQuest’s pending summary judgment/adjudication motion. 

The proposed briefing and hearing dates, as well as the proposed modifications to the 

pages limits, as follows: 

ACTION DEADLINE TO FILE 

Monster Cable’s Amended Motion to Amend Its 

Infringement Charts 

May 31, 2005 

Monster Cable’s Opposition to AudioQuest’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment/Adjudication (not to exceed 45 

pages, per previous Court Order) 

June 7, 2005 

Monster Cable’s affirmative motion for summary 

judgment/adjudication (not to exceed 45 pages) 

June 8, 2005 

AudioQuest’s Opposition to Monster Cable’s Motion to 

Amend 

June 17, 2005 

Case 3:04-cv-00005-MHP Document 73 Filed 05/27/2005 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:04-cv-00005-MHP Document 77 Filed 06/01/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3 

STIPULATION TO RESET HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULES FOR PENDING AND 

ANTICIPATED MOTIONS, AND TO MODIFY PAGE LIMITS, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO: CV 04-0005 MHP (E-FILE 

Monster Cable’s Reply in Support of Its Motion to 

Amend 

June 24, 2005 

 • AudioQuest’s Opposition to Monster Cable’s 

motion for summary judgment/adjudication (not to 

exceed 45 pages) 

 • AudioQuest’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for

Summary Judgment/Adjudication (not to exceed 

25 pages, per previous Court Order) 

June 27, 2005 

Monster Cable’s Reply in support of Its Motion for 

Summary Judgment/Adjudication (not to exceed 25 

pages)

July 5, 2005 

Hearing on All Motions July 18, 2006 

This stipulation is not entered into for purposes of delay on behalf of either party. Other 

than the proposed modifications described above, the parties do not believe that the proposed 

schedule will affect or delay any of the other deadlines in this case. In addition, the parties agree 

that by entering into this stipulation, neither party is conceding the validity of any argument 

offered by the other party in its briefs, nor waiving any rights with respect to the arguments raised 

in its own briefs. 

Case 3:04-cv-00005-MHP Document 73 Filed 05/27/2005 Page 3 of 4

July 25, 2005 at 2:00 pm

Case 3:04-cv-00005-MHP Document 77 Filed 06/01/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 4 

STIPULATION TO RESET HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULES FOR PENDING AND 

ANTICIPATED MOTIONS, AND TO MODIFY PAGE LIMITS, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO: CV 04-0005 MHP (E-FILE 

Dated: May 26, 2005 MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

By: /s/ 

Ian N. Feinberg 

 Michael A. Molano 

 Joshua M. Masur 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Monster Cable Products, Inc. 

Dated: May 26, 2005 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP 

By: /s/ 

Kenneth E. Keller 

 Christopher T. Holland 

 Michael D. Lisi 

 Lori Behun 

Attorneys for Defendant 

The Quest Group d/b/a AudioQuest 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: , 2005 

Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

Chief Judge, United States District Court 

Case 3:04-cv-00005-MHP Document 73 Filed 05/27/2005 Page 4 of 4

May 31,

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:04-cv-00005-MHP Document 77 Filed 06/01/05 Page 4 of 4