Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04143/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04143-38/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-04143-JW (HRL) 

44044924

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IAN N. FEINBERG (SBN 88324) 

ifeinberg@mayerbrown.com

W. JOSEPH MELNIK (pro hac vice) 

jmelnik@mayerbrown.com

BRANDON BAUM (SBN 121318) 

bbaum@mayerbrown.com 

MICHAEL A. MOLANO (SBN 171057) 

mmolano@mayerbrown.com 

JOSHUA M. MASUR (SBN 203510) 

jmasur@mayerbrown.com 

ERIC B. EVANS (SBN 232476) 

eevans@mayerbrown.com 

CLIFF A. MAIER (SBN 248858) 

cmaier@mayerbrown.com 

MAYER BROWN LLP

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE 

ASSOCIATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CRYPTOGRAPHY RESEARCH, INC., 

Plaintiff and 

Counterdefendant, 

v. 

VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE 

ASSOCIATION, 

Defendant and 

Counterclaimant, 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case No. CV 04-4143-JW (HRL) 

[PROPOSED] THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

*E-filed 2/25/08*

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 436 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 6
 

- 1 -

 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-04143-JW (HRL) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Whereas, Defendant Visa International Service Association (“Visa International”) sought 

from Plaintiff Cryptography Research, Inc. (“CRI”) information developed in relation to CRI’s 

licensing of technology to the entity referred to as Doe Corporation in the February 7, 2008 

Order on Defendant’s Motion to Compel and for Sanctions (Docket No. 429) (referred to herein 

as “Doe Corp. Materials”); and 

Whereas, the Doe Corp. Materials may include information relating to the 

implementation and testing of the technology licensed by CRI to Doe Corporation, which 

implementation materials may include, but are not limited to, software source code, Hardware 

Description Language (HDL) source code (VHDL), test vectors, circuit netlists or schematics, or 

semiconductor layouts (“Implementation Materials”). 

Now, therefore, pursuant to the February 7, 2008 Order on Defendant’s Motion to 

Compel and for Sanctions (Docket No. 429), CRI and Defendant Visa International Service 

Association (“Visa International”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as 

follows: 

The production, discovery and use of the Doe Corp. Materials shall be subject to all the 

provisions in the protective order entered in this case on March 21, 2005 (the “Protective 

Order”), as may be amended or modified by the Court. In addition, information designated 

“Implementation Materials” shall be treated in accordance with Section 7.3 of the Protective 

Order and subject to the following additional provisions:1

1. CRI or Doe Corp. may designate any documents, materials or information as 

“Implementation Materials.” Section 6 of the Protective Order shall apply to challenges to any 

disputes over CRI or Doe Corp.’s designation of materials as Implementation Materials. 

2. Outside Counsel for the Receiving Party shall retain exclusive possession at its 

offices of the Implementation Materials and agrees to maintain only one copy of the media via 

which the Implementation Materials were produced at a single facility of Receiving Party’s 

Outside Counsel. When the Implementation Materials are not in use, they will be stored in a 

1

 This document incorporates the Protective Order by reference, and all definitions provided in 

Section 2 of the Protective Order likewise apply to this document. 

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 436 Filed 02/25/08 Page 2 of 6
 

- 2 -

 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-04143-JW (HRL) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

secure, locked area with access limited to those persons who may view the Implementation 

Materials under the Protective Order. 

3. Notwithstanding the prior paragraph, Outside Counsel for the Receiving Party 

may copy any electronic Implementation Materials into memory or disk storage of a single 

computer at a facility of Outside Counsel or, if reasonably necessary, at a facility of Receiving 

Party’s Expert, provided that such computer is password-protected. If the facility is that of 

Receiving Party’s Expert, a representative of the Outside Counsel shall be present at said facility 

while said copy is present, whether or not the Implementation Materials are being viewed or 

analyzed at the time. Said computer shall be non-networked whether or not the electronic code is 

being viewed or analyzed at the time. Whereas viewing or analysis of certain of the 

Implementation Materials, such as chip implementation details, may require the use of 

commercial software which requires a network connection for activation or licensing purposes, 

nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the networking of a computer containing the 

Implementation Materials from being networked to the extent that networking is required in 

order for such viewing or analysis. If networking is required, it shall be enabled only when 

required by the analysis or viewing software and only for the length of time so required. In such 

cases, the Implementation Materials shall not be present on a networked computer except when 

being viewed or analyzed, and no part of the Implementation Materials shall be transferred over 

any network connection. Nothing in the prior paragraph prevents incidental copying into 

memory of the electronic code (or any portion of it) as part of its investigation, analysis, or 

review, such as in a smart card, emulator, simulator, or debugger. 

4. CRI and/or Doe Corporation may redact or substitute any static master keys. If 

such master keys are removed they must be replaced with substitute data so as to not prevent 

ordinary operation. CRI and/or Doe Corporation shall identify to Visa International the location 

of all such redactions or substitutions. In the event Visa International determines it is impractical 

or burdensome to evaluate the Implementation Materials by virtue of such redactions or 

substitutions, the parties shall meet and confer in good faith to determine an alternate approach 

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 436 Filed 02/25/08 Page 3 of 6
 

- 3 -

 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-04143-JW (HRL) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

that would allow Visa International to evaluate the unredacted Implementation Materials under 

conditions intended to protect Doe Corporation’s confidentiality interests. 

5. CRI and Visa International acknowledge that any Expert retained and approved 

pursuant to the Protective Order may not take and maintain actual possession of the media on 

which the electronic code is produced or the computer on which the electronic code is loaded, 

except at the locations and under the conditions provided for above. 

6. If electronic code comprising part of the Implementation Materials is produced in 

encrypted form, when not in use, it must be stored in encrypted form. 

7. Unencrypted excerpts of the electronic code may be included in electronic 

documents such as legal memoranda, exhibits, reports, declarations, or other word processing or 

presentation documents provided that electronic versions of such documents are password 

protected. 

8. If any document is filed with the Court that contains the electronic code (or 

portions thereof), an application to file the document under seal will be made as set forth in the 

Protective Order. The filing party agrees to immediately notify Doe Corporation so that the 

appropriate declaration establishing that the designated information is sealable can be filed by 

Doe Corporation pursuant to the requirements of Civil L.R. 79-5. 

9. CRI and Visa International will each provide to Doe Corporation a list of their 

respective Experts to whom they intend to provide access to Disclosure or Discovery Material 

that Doe Corporation has designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes 

Only,” or CRI has designated “Implementation Materials.” The list will for each expert set forth 

the information required by section 7.4(a) of the Protective Order and Doe Corporation shall 

have the opportunity to object to any proposed expert as provided in section 7.4(b). 

10. Section 11 of the Stipulated Protective Order (“Final Disposition”) shall apply to 

the electronic code except that compliance shall be within thirty days after termination and, if the 

electronic code is returned, shall be returned in encrypted form and the returning party shall 

certify that the media containing all electronic copes have been either destroyed or securely 

erased using at least three passes of random data. 

, ,

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 436 Filed 02/25/08 Page 4 of 6
 

- 4 -

 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-04143-JW (HRL) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

11. Except for paragraph 8 above, excerpts of electronic Implementation Materials 

may be printed using printers attached to the single computer referenced in paragraph 3 only for 

the purpose of facilitating the review thereof or for compiling deposition or Court filing exhibits. 

 The parties shall endeavor to keep to a minimum the amount of electronic Implementation 

Materials that is so printed and shall promptly destroy any printed excerpts that are determined 

not to be relevant to any claim or defense of any party. Every such printed page must be affixed 

with a legend “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY – 

IMPLEMENTATION MATERIALS” and shall be treated as such in accordance with section 7.3 

of the provisions of the Protective Order, as amended. At no point may the entire electronic 

Implementation Materials, or any substantial portions thereof, be printed or included in 

electronic documents such as legal memoranda, exhibits, reports, declarations, or other word 

processing or presentation documents. Any authorized paper copies of limited portions of the 

electronic Implementation Material retained by either party must be kept in a secured container 

or location at all times. Paper copies of electronic Implementation Materials may not be copied 

and may not be removed from a secured container unless in a secured, private area. Both parties 

shall maintain a complete log of bates numbered pages of printed Implementation Materials.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD 

For Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant 

CRYPTOGRAPHY RESEARCH, INC. 

___/s/ Ryan A. Tyz______________________ Ryan A. Tyz 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB No. 054283) 

lpasahow@fenwick.com 

J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148) 

dhadden@fenwick.com 

JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB No. 178058) 

jwakefield@fenwick.com 

DARREN E. DONNELLY (CSB No. 

194335) ddonnelly@fenwick.com 

DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB No. 223936) 

dschumann@fenwick.com 

RYAN A. TYZ (CSB No. 234895) 

rtyz@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley 

Center 801 California Street 

For Defendant/Counterclaimant 

VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE 

ASSOCIATION 

____/s/ Eric B. Evans___________________

Eric B. Evans 

MAYER BROWN LLP 

IAN N. FEIBERG (SBN 88324) 

ifeinberg@mayerbrownrowe.com 

BRANDON BAUM (SBN 121318) 

bbaum@mayerbrownrowe.com 

MICHAEL A. MOLANO (SBN 171057) 

mmolano@mayerbrownrowe.com 

ERIC B. EVANS (SBN 232476) 

eevans@mayerbrownrowe.com 

CLIFF A. MAIER (SBN 248858) 

cmaier@mayerbrown.com 

MAYER BROWN LLP 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 436 Filed 02/25/08 Page 5 of 6
 

- 5 -

 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-04143-JW (HRL) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the filer hereby attests that 

the signatories’ concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated_____________________ 

 U

The Honorable Harold R. Lloyd 

United States Magistrate Judge 

HOWARD R. LLOYD 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2/25/08

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 436 Filed 02/25/08 Page 6 of 6