Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00736/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00736-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED	STATES	DISTRICT	COURT

EASTERN	DISTRICT	OF	CALIFORNIA

ARCHIE CRANFORD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ANGELA BADAGON, et al.,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:11-cv-00736-LJO-BAM 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 

DENIAL OF MOTION FOR TEMPORARY 

RESTRAINING ORDER

(ECF Nos. 48, 70, 72)

Plaintiff Archie Cranfor (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On June 12, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 

Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order be denied. The Findings and 

Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be 

filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (ECF No. 70.) Plaintiff filed objections on June 20, 

2014. (ECF No. 72.) 

The Court has considered Plaintiff’s objections, but does not find any basis to reject the 

Magistrate Judge’s determination that Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on 

the merits, likelihood of irreparable harm, a balance of equities in his favor, or that an injunction 

is in the public interest. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

including Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Case 1:11-cv-00736-BAM Document 73 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, issued on June 12, 2014, are adopted in full; 

and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2014

 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00736-BAM Document 73 Filed 06/24/14 Page 2 of 2