Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02762/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02762-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MALAD BALDWIN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JAMES COLLEY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-02762-KAW 

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 33

On March 8, 2016, the parties filed a proposed stipulated protective order. They did not, 

however, indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order 

as required by the Court’s Standing Order. (See Judge Westmore’s General Standing Order ¶ 11.)

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration 

stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders, (b) a declaration explaining 

each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed 

protective order with the model order, available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/modelprotective-orders, or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not 

practicable.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 03/15/16

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:15-cv-02762-KAW Document 34 Filed 03/15/16 Page 1 of 1