Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05642/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05642-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMITS AND ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT 

 Case Number C03-05642JF 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stuart M. Grant (pro hac vice) 

John C. Kairis (pro hac vice) 

Lauren E. Wagner (pro hac vice) 

Kimberly L. Wierzel (pro hac vice) 

Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. 

Chase Manhattan Centre 

1201 North Market Street 

Wilmington, DE 19801 

Tel: 302.622.7000 

Fax: 302.622.7100 

sgrant@gelaw.com 

Merrill Glen Emerick (State Bar No. 117248) 

Anderlini, Finkelstein, Emerick & Smoot 

400 S. El Camino Real - Suite 700 

San Mateo, CA 94402 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff 

The Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IN RE REDBACK NETWORKS, INC, 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

_______________________________________

 

This Document Relates to: All Actions 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case Number C 03-05642 JF 

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMITS 

AND ESTABLISHING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST 

AMENDED CONSOLIDATED 

COMPLAINT 

Date: N/A 

Time: N/A 

Place: N/A 

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

WHEREAS, on June 8, 2005 the Court entered an Order pursuant to which 

Defendants’ motions to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Complaint in this action were 

filed on June 10, 2005, and Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motions is due to be filed on July 15, 

2005 and defendants’ reply memoranda in further support of their motions to dismiss are due to 

be filed on August 5, 2005; 

**E-filed 7/19/05**

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 212 Filed 07/19/05 Page 1 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 2 

FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSES TO THE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

Case Number C03-05642JF

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 7-3 provides for a twenty-five (25) page limit for 

any opposition to a motion and supporting memorandum; 

WHEREAS, in order to promote the interests of judicial efficiency, Plaintiffs 

intend to file one Omnibus Brief In Opposition To Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss The First 

Amended Consolidated Complaint (“Omnibus Brief”); 

WHEREAS given the complexity of the Defendants’ combined 80-page motions 

to dismiss, as well their references to previously filed memoranda in this case, Plaintiffs believe 

it is appropriate to request that the Court permit them to file a brief in excess of the twenty-five 

page limit provided by the Local Rules, and to permit Plaintiffs to present their points and 

authorities in one Omnibus Brief; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs believe that they will need no more than a total of onehundred (100) pages for their Omnibus Brief; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs request approximately one (1) additional business day to 

file their Omnibus Brief, which extends Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their opposition to 

defendants’ motions to dismiss to Tuesday, July 19, 2005, no later than 9:00 a.m. (Pacific DayLight Savings Time); 

WHEREAS Defendants consent to Plaintiffs’ proposed page limits and request 

for additional time to file the Omnibus Brief; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the 

undersigned, subject to approval of the Court that: 

1. Plaintiffs may file an Omnibus Brief in opposition to Defendants motion 

to dismiss on July 19, 2005, no later than 9:00 a.m. (Pacific Day-Light Savings Time);. 

2. Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Brief may exceed the twenty-five (25) page limit 

imposed by Civil Local Rule 7-3, but may not exceed a total of one hundred (100) pages, 

exclusive of the caption page, table of contents, table of authorities, declarations and exhibits. 

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 212 Filed 07/19/05 Page 2 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 3 

FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSES TO THE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

Case Number C03-05642JF

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: July 15, 2005 /s/ Lauren E. Wagner________

Stuart M. Grant (pro hac vice) 

John C. Kairis (pro hac vice) 

Lauren E. Wagner (pro hac vice) 

Kimberly L. Wierzel (pro hac vice) 

GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 

Chase Manhattan Centre 

1201 North Market Street 

Wilmington, DE 19801 

Telephone: (302) 622-7000 

Facsimile: (302) 622-7100 

Merrill Glen Emerick (State Bar No. 

117248) 

Anderlini, Finkelstein, Emerick & Smoot 

400 S. El Camino Real – Suite 700 

San Mateo, CA 94402 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff 

The Connecticut Retirement Plan and 

Trust Funds 

 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & 

ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

Dated: July 15, 2005 By: /s/ John P. Stigi III 

Terry T. Johnson 

John P. Stigi III 

Kristin A. Dillehay 

Laura R. Smith 

Cameron P. Hoffman 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 

Attorneys for the Redback Defendants 

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 212 Filed 07/19/05 Page 3 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 4 

FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSES TO THE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

Case Number C03-05642JF

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: July 15, 2005 CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 

By:___/s/ LaShann M. DeArcy_________

Rowan D. Wilson (State Bar No. 118488) 

LaShann M. DeArcy 

Worldwide Plaza, 825 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10019 

Telephone: (212) 474-1000 

Facsimile: (212) 474-3700 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________ 

United States District Court Judge 

7/19/05 Jeremy Fogel /s/electronic signature authorized

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 212 Filed 07/19/05 Page 4 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 5 

FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSES TO THE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

Case Number C03-05642JF

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Attestation Of Filer Concerning Signature 

I, Lauren E. Wagner, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being 

used to file this Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Regarding 

Page Limits And Establishing Briefing Schedule For Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Defendants’ 

Motion To Dismiss The First Amended Consolidated Complaint. In compliance with General 

Order 45.X.B and as the filer of this document, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from each of the counsel/signatories listed above. 

Dated: July 15, 2005 GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 

 By: /s/ Lauren E. Wagner 

 Lauren E. Wagner (pro hac vice) 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff 

The Connecticut Retirement Plan and Trust Funds 

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 212 Filed 07/19/05 Page 5 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 6 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify the foregoing was served upon the following counsel of record by electronic 

case filing on July 15, 2005: 

Robert A. Jigarjian 

Robert S. Green 

Green & Jigarjian LLP 

235 Pine Street, 15th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Mark C. Gardy 

Charles H. Dufresne 

Abbey Gardy, LLP 

212 East 39th Street 

New York, NY 10016 

Luke O. Brooks 

100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Lionel Z. Glancy 

Michael M. Goldberg 

Glancy & Binkow LLP 

1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Thomas G. Rafferty 

Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP 

Worldwide Plaza, 825 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10019 

John M. Richilano 

Richilano & Ridley, P.C. 

1800 – 15th Street, Suite 101 

Denver, CO 80202-1185 

Marc L. Godino 

Braun Law Group, P.C. 

12400 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 920 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

Terry T. Johnson 

John P. Stigi III 

Kristin Anne Dillehay 

Laura R. Smith 

Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Darren J. Robbins 

Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman 

 & Robbins LLP 

401 B Street, Suite 1700 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Betsy C. Manifold 

Rachele R. Rickert 

Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 

Symphony Towers 

750 B Street, Suite 2770 

San Diego, CA 92101 

David A. Zisser 

Isaacson, Rosenbaum, Woods & Levy, P.C. 

633 17th Street, Suite 2200 

Denver, CO 80202 

 By: /s/ Lauren E.Wagner Lauren E. Wagner 

Case 5:03-cv-05642-JF Document 212 Filed 07/19/05 Page 6 of 6