Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00182/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00182-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U N ITED STATES DISTRICT COU RT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY H. SOLVEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES TILTON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00182-LJO-GSA PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

DEFENDANT VOSS FROM ACTION

PURSUANT TO RULE 4(M)

(Doc. 97)

Plaintiff StanleyH. Solvey, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and California law. The action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s amended complaint,

filed June 20, 2007, on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment and state law tort claims arising from his

exposure to and illness from Valley Fever, and the treatment of his subsequent medical issues and

complaints by prison staff members. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302, and on November 20, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a

Findings and Recommendations recommending dismissal of M. C. Voss, an unserved defendant,

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Plaintiff filed an Objection on December 21,

2009. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, it is

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1

Case 1:07-cv-00182-LJO-GSA Document 103 Filed 01/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 20, 2009, is adopted in full;

and

2. Defendant Voss is dismissed from this action based on Plaintiff’s failure to provide

information sufficient for the United States Marshal to effect service of process. Fed.

R. Civ. P. 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:07-cv-00182-LJO-GSA Document 103 Filed 01/06/10 Page 2 of 2