Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01888/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01888-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WANXIA LIAO,

Plaintiff,

v.

RONALD QUIDACHAY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 05-1888 CW

ORDER FOR

PLAINTIFF TO FILE

PROOF OF SERVICE

On October 12, 2005, this Court issued an order granting

Defendants' motion to dismiss and denying Plaintiff's motions for

a stay. See October 12, 2005 Order (Docket # 27). In this order,

the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a second amended

complaint (SAC) within twenty days from the date of the Order. 

October 12, 2005 Order at 11. The Court stated, "If Plaintiff

chooses to file an amended complaint, she must properly serve the

SAC and summons on Defendants or ask Defendants to waive service. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c), (d)." Id.

On November 1, 2005, Plaintiff filed a SAC. To date,

Defendants have not filed an answer. Because Plaintiff did not

file proof of service of the SAC and summons or proof that she

Case 4:05-cv-01888-CW Document 32 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

asked Defendants to waive service, she may not have complied with

the Court's instructions to serve Defendants properly. Therefore,

within twenty days from the date of this order, Plaintiff must file

proof that she properly served Defendants or asked them to waive

service. If Plaintiff fails to file such proof, the SAC will be

dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Furthermore, under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, if Plaintiff did not serve the complaint within 120 days

after filing it, she must show good cause for failing to do so. 

See F. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Also, if Plaintiff did ask Defendants for

a waiver, but they did not agree to it, then she must serve them in

the appropriate manner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 9/11/06

 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-01888-CW Document 32 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIAO et al,

Plaintiff,

 v.

QUIDACHAY et al,

 Defendant. /

Case Number: CV05-01888 CW 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on September 11, 2006, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by

placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter

listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an

inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Kay K. Yu

State Attorney General's Office

455 Golden Gate Avenue

Suite 11000

San Francisco, CA 94102-3664

Wanxia Liao

7 Beatrice Street

Toronto, ON M6J 2T2

Dated: September 11, 2006

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Sheilah Cahill, Deputy Clerk

Case 4:05-cv-01888-CW Document 32 Filed 09/11/06 Page 3 of 3