Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04646/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04646-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT NANCY L. HOLM, dba A.W. SHUCKS, 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. C04-04646 PVT

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

JESSICA A. DAYTON (State Bar No. 231698)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JAREK MOLSKI

and DISABILITY RIGHTS 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION, 

SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK MOLSKI, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES:HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

A.W. SHUCKS; NANCY L. HOLM, dba

A.W. SHUCKS, 

Defendant. ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-04646 PVT

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANT NANCY L. HOLM, dba A.W.

SHUCKS, TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

XXXXXXXXXX

Case 5:04-cv-04646-JF Document 16 Filed 10/04/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT NANCY L. HOLM, dba A.W. SHUCKS, 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. C04-04646 PVT

2

Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI and DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES:HELPING YOU HELP OTHERS, and defendant NANCY L.

HOLM, dba A.W. SHUCKS, through their undersigned counsel stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant NANCY L. HOLM, dba A.W. SHUCKS is granted an extension of

time to and including October 14, 2005 to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ complaint.

2. In the event defendant NANCY L. HOLM, dba A.W. SHUCKS files a motion in

lieu of an answer to plaintiffs’ complaint, the hearing on such motion shall be set on a date no

sooner than 45 days from the filing of said motion.

3. Defendant’s counsel further stipulates that defendant will comply with any and all

due dates dictated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Court, and/or any

scheduling order issued by the court prior to the date on which defendant’s responsive pleading

is due hereunder.

This Stipulation may be executed in faxed counterparts, all of which together shall

constitute one original document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: September 30, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Jennifer L. Steneberg

Jennifer L. Steneberg 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI and

DISABILITY RIGHTSENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES:HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

DATED: September 30, 2005 PRO PER 

By: _______/s/ Nancy L. Holm__________

Nancy L. Holm, dba A.W. SHUCKS 

Case 5:04-cv-04646-JF Document 16 Filed 10/04/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT NANCY L. HOLM, dba A.W. SHUCKS, 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. C04-04646 PVT

3

ORDER

Defendant NANCY L. HOLM, dba A.W. SHUCKS is hereby granted an extension of

time to and including October 14, 2005 to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:___________, 2005 

Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull 

United States Magistrate Judge

 10/3

Case 5:04-cv-04646-JF Document 16 Filed 10/04/05 Page 3 of 3