Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05295/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05295-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BALTAZAR GODOY-AGUIRRE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHARLES GILKEY, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 03 5295 OWW LJO P 

ORDER VACATING SECOND ORDER

DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE

DEFENDANT PITZER

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

SERVE COPY OF THIS ORDER ON U.S.

MARSHAL 

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint against

Defendants Gilkey, Williams and Pitzer. Defendants Gilkey and Williams waived service on

July 19, 2004. However, the Summons on Defendant Pitzer was returned to the Court

unexecuted. Thus, on January 23, 2006, the Court issued a Second Order directing service by the

U.S. Marshal. A review of the Court record, however, shows that Counsel for Defendants Gilkey

and Williams filed a formal Answer on January 10, 2006, and January 11, 2006, on behalf

Defendants Gilkey, Williams and Pitzer. In light of Counsel’s appearance in the action on

behalf of Defendant Pitzer, the Court Order directing service by the U.S. Marshal for the second

time is VACATED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Order on the U.S.

Marshall forthwith. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05295-OWW -LJO Document 58 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 1