Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04518/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04518-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD SIEMERS, Individually, And on

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, H.D. VEST

INVESTMENT SERVICES, LLC, WELLS

FARGO INVESTMENTS, LLC, WELLS

FARGO FUNDS MANAGEMENT, LLC,

WELLS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.,

STEPHENS INC., WELLS FARGO FUNDS

DISTRIBUTOR, LLC, and WELLS FARGO

FUNDS TRUST,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-04518 WHA

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

AND RELATED DATES

WHEREAS on September 11, 2006, the Clerk of the Court issued a notice that this

Court had scheduled a case management conference for September 21, 2006 at 11:00 a.m.

(“CMC Notice”);

WHEREAS, the CMC Notice states that “Parties requesting a continuance shall submit a

stipulation and proposed order”;

WHEREAS, lead counsel for Lead Plaintiff has a scheduling conflict on September 21,

2006 in that the partner-in-charge, Mr. Michael Reese, has non-refundable airline tickets

purchased prior to issuance of the CMC Notice in order to travel to his mother that day to aide

and assist her as she receives chemotherapy treatment for cancer;

Case 3:05-cv-04518-WHA Document 124 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

WHEREAS counsel for all parties are available to conduct a case management

conference on September 28, 2006, which appears to be a date available to the Court; and

WHEREAS, counsel for all Defendants has agreed to Mr. Reese’s request for a

continuance of the case management conference in light of the circumstances described above.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree, and the Court hereby orders, as

follows:

1. The Case Management Conference currently set for September 21, 2006 at

11:00 a.m. shall be continued until September 28, 2006 at 11:00 a.m.; and

2. The parties shall submit a joint case management conference statement not less

than three days prior to the case management conference.

Dated: September 14, 2006 GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP

By: /s/ Michael R. Reese 

Michael R. Reese

230 Park Avenue, Suite 963

New York, New York 10169

- and - 

GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP

Adam M. Gutride

835 Douglass Street

San Francisco, California 94119

Court Appointed Lead Counsel

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45, §X.B

I, Michael R. Reese, hereby declare pursuant to General Order 45, § X.B, that I have

obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from Mr. Bruce Ericson, the signatory

listed below. 

Case 3:05-cv-04518-WHA Document 124 Filed 09/15/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on September 14, 2006 at New York, New York.

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

By: /s/ Bruce A. Ericson 

Bruce A. Ericson

50 Fremont Street

Post Office Box 7880

San Francisco, California 94120

Attorney for Defendants

ORDER

The case management conference is hereby CONTINUED to SEPTEMBER 28, 2006, AT

11:00 A.M. Please file a joint case management statement at least seven days prior. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2006. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-04518-WHA Document 124 Filed 09/15/06 Page 3 of 3