Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00518/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00518-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICOLAS GONZALEZ-CAYETANO, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF )

AMERICA, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

)

1:05-cv-00518-OWW-LJO-P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(Doc. 12) 

Plaintiff Nicolas Gonzalez-Cayetano (“plaintiff”) is a federal

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)

and Local Rule 72-302.

On December 16, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that an objections to the Findings and

Recommendations, if any, was to be filed within thirty (30) days. To

date, plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:05-cv-00518-OWW -LJO Document 15 Filed 02/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and

Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this

case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 16, 2005,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s complaint, filed

April 20, 2005, against defendants Robertson, Garcia, and Juarez for

use of excessive force, and against defendant Robertson for

retaliation;

3. The following claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice, for

plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted:

a. Plaintiff’s claim based on the failure to report the

incident of excessive force, and the failure to document plaintiff’s

injuries;

b. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical care claims;

c. Plaintiff’s state law claims for oppression, fraud, and

misrepresentation;

d. Plaintiff’s conspiracy claim; and,

e. Plaintiff’s claim based on the failure to investigate,

supervise, and train; and,

4. Defendants Corrections Corporation of America, California

City Correctional Center, Pluta, Carpenter, Wong, Gilkey, Ramos, and

///

///

///

Case 1:05-cv-00518-OWW -LJO Document 15 Filed 02/16/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Lujano are DISMISSED from this action based on plaintiff’s failure to

state any claims upon which relief may be granted against them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00518-OWW -LJO Document 15 Filed 02/16/06 Page 3 of 3