Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01573/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01573-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RALPH GRANT McHENRY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-1573 DFL DAD P

vs.

DR. VAN C. VONG, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On September 7, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order filed August 24, 2005, denying plaintiff’s December 10, 2004 second

motion to reinstate Dr. Van C. Vong as a defendant and denying plaintiff’s February 1, 2005

third motion for appointment of counsel.

A magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary

to law.” Local Rule 72-303(f). Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

appear that the magistrate judge’s rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:03-cv-01573-DFL-DAD Document 55 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed August 24, 2005, and docketed as #52 is affirmed. 

DATED: 11/11/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01573-DFL-DAD Document 55 Filed 11/14/05 Page 2 of 2