Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL

CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff

 v.

MEDIATEK, INC., et al.,

Defendants /

No. C 05-3148 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On May 8, 2006, defendants, on behalf of all parties, electronically filed the

Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement. Defendants have violated General Order 45

and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later

than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one

paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and .

. . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” 

See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Defendants are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply with the

Court’s Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 90 Filed 05/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 90 Filed 05/18/06 Page 2 of 2