Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06524/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06524-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALONSO LIZARRAGA-RIOS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

R. D. ANDREWS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

CV F 04 6524 AWI LJO HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #13]

ORDER TRANSFERRING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO THE

NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AS

A PETITION FOR REVIEW

Petitioner is detained by the United States Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement

(“ICE”) and is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2241. 

On May 27, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition be transferred to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, because the “Real ID

Act of 2005,” enacted May 11, 2005, requires removal of all petitions challenging orders of removal,

deportation or exclusion to the Ninth Circuit. This Findings and Recommendation was served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be

filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and

Case 1:04-cv-06524-AWI-LJO Document 14 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 2

no party has filed objections. In addition, Petitioner has not sought a stay of removal. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued May 27, 2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; and 

2. The petition is TRANSFERRED to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals as a petition for

review.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06524-AWI-LJO Document 14 Filed 07/27/05 Page 2 of 2