Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02064/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02064-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Case No. C 06-2064 JW)

Lukens La

w

Group

One Mariti

me Plaza, Suite 1600

San Francisco, C

A 94111

LUKENS LAW GROUP

WILLIAM M. LUKENS (SBN 037196)

JENNIFER L. JONAK (SBN 191323)

One Maritime Plaza, Suite 1600

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 433-3000

Facsimile: (415) 781-1034

Attorneys for Plaintiff John C. Rezner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN C. REZNER, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

BAYERISCHE HYPO-UND VEREINSBANK

AG, a corporation; HVB STRUCTURED

FINANCE, INC., a corporation; RANDALL S.

BICKHAM, an individual; SKYLINE

ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC, a limited liability

corporation; and DOES ONE THROUGH

THIRTY, inclusive;

Defendants.

Case No. C 06-2064 JW

STIPULATION TO FILING OF

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED

COMPLAINT; PROPOSED

ORDER

WHEREAS, Plaintiff John C. Rezner has advised defendants Bayerische HypoUnd Vereinsbank AG and HVB U.S. Finance Inc. f/k/a Structured Finance, Inc.

(collectively, “HVB”) that he intends to seek leave to file a proposed Second Amended 

Complaint, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

WHEREAS, HVB does not oppose or object to the filing of Plaintiff’s proposed 

Second Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, the other defendants in this case are awaiting service or have not yet

responded to the currently operative complaint;

Case 3:06-cv-02064-VC Document 69 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Case No. C 05 1132 MMC)

2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between counsel for Plaintiff John C.

Rezner and counsel for HVB that: 1) there is no opposition or objection to Plaintiff filing 

his proposed Second Amended Complaint; 2) upon the Court’s approval of this

Stipulation and Order granting Plaintiff leave to file his amended complaint, Plaintiff shall

immediately file his Second Amended Complaint; and 3) HVB may, but need not, file an 

answer to the Second Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days from the filing of the

Second Amended Complaint.

The attorney for the filing party attests that concurrence in this document has been 

obtained from the other signatories.

DATED: May 28, 2007

LUKENS LAW GROUP

By__/s/_________________

Jennifer L. Jonak

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOHN C. REZNER

DATED: May 28, 207 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP

By: _/s/_________________

Joseph Park

Attorneys for HVB Defendants

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

HON. JAMES WARE

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Date: 5/29/2007

Case 3:06-cv-02064-VC Document 69 Filed 05/29/07 Page 2 of 2