Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00925/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00925-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELISSA WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

No. 2:16-cv-0925 TLN CKD PS

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a document that she characterizes as a motion for summary judgment. 

Plaintiff was previously advised that while the court looks at the entirety of the administrative 

record in reviewing plaintiff’s challenge to the Commissioner’s decision, it is incumbent on 

plaintiff to set forth what errors she believes were committed by the Administrative Law Judge in 

reaching the determination of nondisability. Other than generic statements to the effect that the 

Administrative Law Judge did not take into consideration plaintiff’s prior work history and 

current medical condition, plaintiff sets forth no specific errors committed by the ALJ. Plaintiff’s 

motion is simply insufficient for meaningful review of the ALJ’s decision by this court. Plaintiff 

will be granted one final opportunity to file a motion for summary judgment that complies with 

the requirements set forth in the court’s initial scheduling order. See ECF No. 6 at p. 3.

/////

Case 2:16-cv-00925-CKD Document 24 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment that complies with the scheduling 

order no later than February 10, 2017. Failure to comply with this order shall result in a 

recommendation that the action be dismissed without prejudice.

2. The time for filing opposition and reply shall be adjusted accordingly.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to re-serve a copy of the scheduling order (ECF No. 6) 

on plaintiff.

Dated: January 4, 2017

4 washington0925.ss.msj.2

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-00925-CKD Document 24 Filed 01/04/17 Page 2 of 2