Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-03441/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-03441-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL R. PEEVEY, et al.,

Defendants. /

PAC-WEST TELECOMM, INC,

Counterclaimant,

v.

VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.,

Counterdefendant. 

 /

No. C 03-3441 CW

ORDER SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Plaintiff Verizon California, Inc. appealed this Court's

decision that the Commissioners of the Public Utilities Commission's

decision was not arbitrary or capricious. See June 17, 2004 Order

Resolving Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. The Ninth Circuit

affirmed all the Court's rulings, except for the Court's ruling on

Case 4:03-cv-03441-CW Document 85 Filed 09/14/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

calls to paging customers. Verizon California, Inc. v. Peevey, __

F.3d ___, 2006 WL 2563879, *1 (9th Cir. 2006). As to that issue,

the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded.

Defendants Michael R. Peevey, Loretta M. Lynch, Carl W. Woods,

Goeffrey F. Brown and Susan P. Kennedy, in their official capacities

as Commissioners of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of

California, are ordered to file a brief, by October 6, 2006, on

whether more briefing in this case is necessary or whether the Court

should remand this case, and the outstanding calls to paging

customers issue, to the CPUC. Plaintiff and Counterclaimant PacWest Telecomm, In. may file a response within one week of

Defendants' brief. If the mandate has not issued by October 6,

2006, Defendants shall submit their brief one week after the mandate

is issued; Plaintiff and Counterclaimant will continue to have a

week to file their responses. 

The Court will review the parties' papers and issue an order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 9/14/06 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cv-03441-CW Document 85 Filed 09/14/06 Page 2 of 2