Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05584/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05584-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 196
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1 SEAN D. BAKR CO BAR # 25949

ANREW M. UNTHA, CO BAR #36832

2 WHELER TRIGG O'DONNLL LLP

1801 Californa Street, Suite 3600

3 Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 244-1800

4 Facsimile: (303) 244-1879

5 Attorneys for Defendants Jungle Quest Franchising, LLC;

Wiliam E. Gabbard; Kevin P. Hein; James S. Molloy; and

6 Douglas W. Root

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

7

8

9

10

11

12

UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

13 Ian Inan, an individual; Richard Inan, an CASE NO. C 09-05584 CW

individual; Diane Inan, an individual; and

14 Jungle Pulse, Inc., a Californa Corp., STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUICE

15

16

Plaitiffs,

JUGE: Hon. Claudia Wilken

vs.

FILE DATE: April 26, 2010

17 Jungle Quest Franchising, LLC; Wiliam E. TRIL DATE: Not Set Yet

Gabbard; Kevin P. Hein; James S. Molloy;

18 Douglas W. Root; and Preti Flathert

Believeau Paclios & Halley, LLP,

19

Defendants.

20

21

22 TO TilS HONORALE COURT:

23 SUBJECT TO COURT AFPROV AL, Plaintiffs IAN IN, RICHAR IN,

24 DIA INMA, and JUGLE PULSE, INC. ("PLAITIFFS") Defendants JUGLE QUEST

25 FRACHIG LLC, WILLIA E. GABBAR, KEVIN P. HEIN, JAMS S. MOLLOY, and

26 DOUGLAS W. ROOT (collectively "JUGLE QUEST") (collectively "the Paries"), though

27 their respective attorneys ofrecord, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

28

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 4:09-cv-05584-CW Document 24 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 3
1 WHREAS, PLAINTIFFS filed their Complait in ths Cour on November 24,2009

2 ("Complaint") alleging causes of action for violations of the Californa franchise investment law

3 and the Californa unair business practices law, fraud and deceit, negligent misrepresentation,

4 breach of contract, and for declaratory relief agaist JUGLE QUEST.

5 WHREAS, the PLAINTIFFS and JUGLE QUEST have reached an agreement to

6 settle the causes of action asserted by PLAINTIFFS agaist JUGLE QUEST in the Complait.

7 WHREAS, the Paries have agreed to a dismissal of ths matter with prejudice.

8 This Stipulation of Dismissal does not dismiss PLAITIFFS' clais against Preti

9 Flatherty Believeau Pachios & Halley, LLP.

10

11 IT is SO STIPULATED.

12

13 DATED: April 23, 2010

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21 DATED: April~2010

22

Respectfly submitted,

WHELER TRIGG O'DONNLL LLP

B/!l~

Attorneys for JUNGLE QUEST FRANCHISING LLP,

WILLIAM E. GABBAR, KEVIN P. HEIN, JAMES S.

MALLOY AND DOUGLAS W. ROOT

LAGARS & BOULTER, LLP

23

By

Robert S. Boulter

Attorneys for Plaitiffs IAN INMAN, RICHARD

INN, DIANE INMAN, AND JUGLE PULSE, INC.

4~

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - 2 -

Case 4:09-cv-05584-CW Document 24 Filed 04/30/10 Page 2 of 3
ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

Having considered the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearg therefore IT is

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice between Defendants JUGLE

QUEST FRACHIG LLC, WILLIA E. GABBAR, KEVIN P. HEIN, JAMS S.

MOLLOY, and DOUGLAS W. ROOT (collectively "JUGLE QUEST"), on the one hand, and

Plaitiffs IA IN, RICHA IN, DIA IN, and JUGLE PULSE, INC.

(collectively "PLAITIFFS"), on the other hand, is GRATED, and PLAITIFFS' clais

agaist JUGLE QUEST are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUICE.

6

7

8

9

10

2. This Order of Dismissal With Prejudice does not dismiss PLAINTIFFS' claims

against Preti Flathert Believeau Pachios & Halley, LLP.

11

12 Dated:

13

14

15

Hon. Claudia Wilcin

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - 3 -

4/30/2010

Case 4:09-cv-05584-CW Document 24 Filed 04/30/10 Page 3 of 3