Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01404/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01404-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Jesse Washington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 20, 2015, the assigned Magistrate Judge filed a 

Findings and Recommendations recommending that the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment 

be denied. Those Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that 

any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. On 

November 2, 2015, plaintiff filed objections. Local Rule 304(b).

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including plaintiff’s objection, the 

court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper legal 

analysis.

JESSE WASHINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

v.

R. SAMUELS,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-01404-DAD-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

AND DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

[ECF Nos. 49, 51, 73]

Case 1:12-cv-01404-SAB Document 78 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on October 20, 2015, are adopted in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED;

3. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and

4. The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings regarding 

the schedule and procedures for trial in this civil action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2016 

 DALE A. DROZD

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 1:12-cv-01404-SAB Document 78 Filed 01/05/16 Page 2 of 2