Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00888/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00888-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

HERBERT KNAUSS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF PHOENIX 

Neighborhood Services Department

Neighborhood Preservation Division

Defendant.

No. CV-06-00888-PHX-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Herbert Knauss's Motion for Summary

Judgment (doc. # 15). Local Rule of Civil Procedure 56.1 provides that a party filing for

summary judgment must set forth separate from the memorandum of law, and in full, the

separate facts on which that party relies in support of the motion. The specific facts must

be set forth in serial fashion and not in narrative form. For each fact, the statement must

refer to a specific portion of the record where the fact may be found (i.e., affidavit,

deposition, etc.). Mr. Knauss did not file with his motion for summary judgment a

separate statement of facts supported by the record as required by Rule 56.1. The court

will therefore deny his motion without prejudice to re-file.

Case 2:06-cv-00888-JAT Document 17 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's Motion for

Summary Judgment (doc. #15).

DATED this 16th day of November, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00888-JAT Document 17 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 2