Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00466/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00466-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRAKASH NARAYAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:19-cv-00466-TLN-CKD

ORDER

This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 

302(c)(21).

On January 3, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Objections to the 

findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

///

///

Case 2:19-cv-00466-TLN-CKD Document 61 Filed 02/12/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 3, 2020, are adopted in full; 

2. Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and

3. Plaintiff’s claims against Wells Fargo are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE.

Dated: February 11, 2020

Case 2:19-cv-00466-TLN-CKD Document 61 Filed 02/12/20 Page 2 of 2