Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-03725/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-03725-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND 

PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case No. C03-3725 JW (HRL) 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758) 

Albert P. Bedecarré (Bar No. 148178) 

Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927) 

Emily C. O'Brien (Bar No. 240072) 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Email: davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com 

 albedecarre@quinnemanuel.com 

 carlanderson@quinnemanuel.com 

 emilycobrien@quinnemanuel.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim Defendant 

ZiLOG, Inc. 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

G. Hopkins Guy, III (State Bar No. 124811) 

Kevin Jones (State Bar No. 240205) 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 614-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 

Email: hopguy@orrick.com 

 kjones@orrick.com 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

QuickLogic Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ZiLOG, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

QUICKLOGIC CORPORATION, 

a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 03-3725 JW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO AMEND PATENT 

SCHEDULING ORDER

Judge: The Honorable James Ware 

Case 5:03-cv-03725-JW Document 88 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND 

PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case No. C03-3725 JW (HRL) 

-1- 

50715/1973824.1

STIPULATION

WHEREAS: 

A. The Court issued a Patent Scheduling Order dated September 14, 2006; 

B. The Court’s Patent Scheduling Order contains dates that are inconsistent with the 

Patent Local Rules and the Claim Construction Hearing date, set by the Court at the Case 

Management Conference on September 11, 2006. For example, the Joint Claim Construction and 

Prehearing Statement is currently due two days after Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction 

Brief; and 

C. Plaintiff ZiLOG, Inc. ("ZiLOG") and Defendant QuickLogic Corporation 

("QuickLogic") wish to alleviate these apparent inconsistencies; 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between ZiLOG and QuickLogic, 

through their respective counsel of record, that the following amended schedule be set for Claim 

Construction in this matter: 

AMENDED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE 

DATE ACTION 

October 17, 2006 P.L.R. 4-1(a): Exchange of terms and 

identification of § 112(6) limitations 

October 31, 2006 P.L.R. 4-2(a) and (b): Exchange preliminary 

proposed constructions and supporting extrinsic 

evidence 

November 27, 2006 P.L.R. 4-3: File Joint Claim Construction and 

Prehearing Statement 

December 29, 2006 P.L.R. 4-4: Deadline for Claim Construction 

Discovery 

January 5, 2007 P.L.R. 4-5(a): ZiLOG opening brief and 

supporting evidence 

January 19, 2007 P.L.R. 4-5(b): QuickLogic responsive brief and 

supporting evidence 

January 26, 2007 P.L.R. 4-5(c): ZiLOG reply brief and 

supporting evidence 

February 9, 2007 P.L.R. 4-6: Claim Construction Hearing 

Case 5:03-cv-03725-JW Document 88 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND 

PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case No. C03-3725 JW (HRL) 

-2- 

50715/1973824.1

Dated: October 12, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

By: /s/ Albert P. Bedecarré Albert P. Bedecarré 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

ZiLOG, Inc. 

Dated: October 12, 2006 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

By: /s/ Kevin C. Jones 

 Kevin C. Jones 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

QuickLogic Corporation 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October , 2006 

By: 

 Honorable James Ware 

 United States District Judge 

13

Case 5:03-cv-03725-JW Document 88 Filed 10/13/06 Page 3 of 3