Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-md-01486/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-md-01486-154/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS 

MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST

LITIGATION,

_____________________________________/

This Document Relates to:

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL., Master File No. M-02-01486 PJH (JCS)

MDL No. 1486

Plaintiffs,

Case No. C-06-04333 PJH (JCS)

v.

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, ET AL., ORDER FOLLOWING SEPTEMBER 5, 2008 

DISCOVERY CONFERENCE

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

STATE OF NEW YORK, Case No. C-06-06436 PJH (JCS)

Plaintiff,

v.

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

The Court held a further discovery conference on September 5, 2008. The following counsel

appeared: Emilio Varanini (State of California), Timothy Nord (State of Illinois), Lizabeth Leeds

(State of Florida), Nancy Bonnell (State of Arizona), Richard Schwartz (State of New York),

Steven Bergman (Hynix), Gabriel Rubin (Elpida), Jane Chang (Hynix), David Brownstein (Mosel),

Sangee Ragunathan (State of Florida), Blake Harrop (State of Illinois), John Tennis (State of

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 1908 Filed 09/08/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Maryland), Jonathan Swartz (NEC Electronics), G. Charles Nierlich (Micron), and Howard Ullman

(Nya Technology) .

For the reasons stated on the record, with the agreement of counsel, and good cause

appearing, it is hereby ordered as follows:

1. The plaintiffs shall complete the collection of all data to be used in their damages

survey, along with the creation of a database using that data, not later than October

31, 2008. All gathered information, along with the data that has been inputted into

the database, shall also be produced to defendants not later than October 31, 2008.

2. Not later than January 31, 2009, defendants shall complete the following discovery:

a. A rule 30 (b) (6) deposition of Macro International regarding the collection of

information and data in the survey and assembly of that data into a database,

along with communications with the surveyed entities, and production of

documents related to these items; and

b. Rule 30 (b) (6) depositions of 10 entities that have either failed to respond to

the survey or have responded that they have no relevant documents; and

c. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the topics for examination at these

depositions

3. A further discovery conference is scheduled for December 5, 2008 at 1:30 p.m.. A

joint updated discovery statement shall be filed by December 1, 2008.

 It is so ordered.

Dated: September 8, 2008 

Joseph c. spero

United states magistrate judge

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 1908 Filed 09/08/08 Page 2 of 2