Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01570/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01570-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

Case No. 3:15-cv-01570-JCS 

Joint Stipulation 

LA 132257621 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 

Mark D. Kemple (SBN 145219) 

KempleM@gtlaw.com 

Adil M. Khan (SBN 254039) 

KhanAd@gtlaw.com 

Rachel G. Paul (SBN 300850) 

PaulRa@gtlaw.com 

1840 Century Park East, 19th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Tel: 310-586-7700; Fax: 310-586-7800 

Attorneys for Defendant 

GATE GOURMET, INC. 

MAYALL HURLEY 

A Professional Corporation 

2453 Grand Canal Boulevard 

Stockton, California 95207 

Telephone (209) 477-3833 

Facsimile (209) 473-4818 

WILLIAM J. GORHAM III 

CA State Bar No. 151773 

NICHOLAS J. SCARDIGLI 

CA State Bar No. 249947 

Attorneys for Plaintiff ANDREW ACHAL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ANDREW ACHAL, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GATE GOURMET, INC., and DOES 1-100, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-01570-JCS 

JOINT STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Judge: Joseph C. Spero 

Courtroom: G – 15th Floor 

Filed: March 9, 2015 (State Court) 

Removed: April 6, 2015 

Trial Date: September 19, 2016 

Case 3:15-cv-01570-JCS Document 34 Filed 08/24/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

Case No. 3:15-cv-01570-JCS 

Joint Stipulation

LA 132257621 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Andrew Achal (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Gate Gourmet, Inc. (“Defendant” and 

collectively, the “Parties”), having met and conferred, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS: 

1. On July 14, 2015, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (the “FAC”), including Plaintiff’s 

requests for punitive damages, and injunctive and declaratory relief (Dkt. No. 28); 

2. In doing so, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend certain portions of the FAC on or 

before August 4, 2015, but Plaintiff opted not to amend the First Amended Complaint; 

3. Since the Court issued its order, the Parties have continued to exchange discovery and 

participate in the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Program; 

4. Defendant has requested additional time to file an Answer to the First Amended 

Complaint. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE that Defendant’s deadline 

to file an Answer to the First Amended Complaint shall be extended to September 4, 2015. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: August 20, 2015 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 

By: /s/ Adil M. Khan 

DATED: August 20, 2015 MAYALL HURLEY 

By: /s/ Vladimir J. Kozina 

Dated: 8/24/15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:15-cv-01570-JCS Document 34 Filed 08/24/15 Page 2 of 2