Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05838/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05838-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26:7401 IRS: Tax Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation And [Proposed] Order 1

Case No. C-06-5939-PJH

PETER T. CHURCHILL, Esq.

A Professional Corporation

SB No. 219271 

1682 Novato, Boulevard

Novato, CA 94947

Telephone: (415) 898-2600

Facsimile: (415) 892-1470

Attorney for Defendants

KIMBERLEY ANN BEARY, 

KIMBERLEY ANN BEARY, TRUSTEE UDT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

No. C-06-5838-PJH

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

v. ORDER

LOUIS G. BEARY, et al., 

 

Defendants.

 /

UNITED STATES OF America, By and Through It’s Counsel Cynthia Steir, and Kimberley

Ann Beary and Kimberley Ann Beary Trustee of the Louis G. Beary and Kimberley Ann Beary

Trust, By and Through Their Counsel Peter T Churchill, Represent, Agree and Stipulate as

Follows:

1. The aforementioned parties have engaged in extensive Settlement discussions and

meetings, and agree that a settlement is likely. However, due to the nature of the litigation and the

requirements of governmental processes, it will take time for the details of settlement to be finally

agreed upon and the necessary approvals obtained. Kimberley Ann Beary has produced draft tax

returns for several of the years in question, and will produce the rest within two weeks. These must

be reviewed by the IRS before specific settlement numbers can be agreed upon. Proposed

Settlement documents would have to be reviewed by federal officials. This process will take time. 

Case 4:06-cv-05838-PJH Document 147 Filed 03/04/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation And [Proposed] Order 2

Case No. C-06-5939-PJH

2. In it’s minutes of November 1, 2007, the court has scheduled briefing upon the

Summary Judgment Motion filed by the United States. Yet, the Motion, and briefing, would be

rendered moot by Settlement. However, this briefing would take valuable time and resources which

would be better devoted to furthering the Settlement process of the dispute between these parties,

would interfere with the parties’ ability to come to Settlement at all, and/or, at the very least, would

cause delay in that process. 

3. Therefore, these parties, who are the moving and opposing parties to the Motion,

agree that the briefing and Motion should be continued for a period of 60 days, to enable the success

of their Settlement efforts. 

4. Accordingly, the parties agree to, and request the court to Order, that the Court’s

briefing schedule regarding the Summary Judgment Motion be amended by postponing briefing

dates by 60 days, so that the United States’ supplemental brief would be due by May 5, 2008, the

opposition would be due by May 26, 2008, reply would be due by June 2, 2008, and the hearing

would be continued to June 16, 2008. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

JOSEPH R. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

DATED: /S/ 

CYNTHIA L. STIER

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for the United States 

DATED: /S/ 

PETER T. CHURCHILL

Attorney for Kimberley Ann Beary and

Kimberley Ann Beary Trustee, UDT

Case 4:06-cv-05838-PJH Document 147 Filed 03/04/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation And [Proposed] Order 3

Case No. C-06-5939-PJH

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

1. That the Court’s briefing schedule regarding the Summary Judgment Motion be

amended by postponing briefing dates by 60 days, so that the United States’ supplemental brief

would be due by May 5, 2008, the opposition would be due by May 26, 2008, reply would be due by

June 2, 2008, and the hearing would be continued to June 16, 2008. 

Dated:

_______________________________

HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

3/4/08

Case 4:06-cv-05838-PJH Document 147 Filed 03/04/08 Page 3 of 3