Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01125/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01125-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

00443796.WPD

Barbara Thompson, SBN 199997

Plumas County Counsel

COUNTY OF PLUMAS

520 Main Street, Room 302

Quincy, CA 95971

(530) 283-6240

(530) 283-6116 (Fax)

Terence J. Cassidy, SBN 099180

Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494

PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

A Professional Corporation

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

Telephone: (916) 929-1481

Facsimile: (916) 927-3706

ATTORNEYS FOR Defendants COUNTY OF PLUMAS, CALIFORNIA, JOHN BANKS,

BILL POWERS, ROBERT MEACHER, WILLIAM N. DENNISON, ROSE COMSTOCK

AND OLE OLSEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT SCHMIDT,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF PLUMAS, CALIFORNIA, 

JOHN BANKS, CAROL LEE, BILL 

POWERS, ROBERT MEACHER, 

WILLIAM N. DENNISON, ROSE 

COMSTOCK and OLE OLSEN

Defendants.

 /

Case No.:2:05-cv-1125 MCE GGH

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

AMEND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING

ORDER

The Court amended the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order at the request of the Defendants

on May 12, 2006. The Pre-Trial Scheduling Order was amended largely due to Defendants

retaining new counsel. Since that time, the parties have engaged in discovery, including

numerous depositions of the parties, written discovery, and exchange of documents.

///

///

Case 2:05-cv-01125-MCE -GGH Document 32 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

00443796.WPD

On April 12, 2006, the parties engaged in mediation. That proceeding was not 

successful. Having conducted further discovery, the parties desire to engage in further 

mediation efforts. It is anticipated that the mediation will be scheduled in late August or 

mid-September.

On June 19, 2006, Plaintiff submitted a Motion to Amend his Complaint. The parties

have now agreed on a stipulation to allow that amendment. That stipulation will be filed

shortly.

Defendants have called the Court regarding a date for its dispositive motion. 

Defendants were advised that September 11 was the date closest to the September 25, 2006

deadline for filing dispositive motions as indicated in the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order. 

Based upon the foregoing, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to amend the PreTrial Scheduling Order. The amendment proposed only changes the date for filing 

dispositive motions. The parties hereby agree that dispositive motions must be heard by 

November 30, 2006. 

Dated: July 25, 2006 PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

A Professional Corporation

By / s / 

Carl L. Fessenden

Attorneys for Defendants

COUNTY OF PLUMAS, CALIFORNIA,

JOHN BANKS, BILL POWERS, ROBERT

MEACHER, WILLIAM N. DENNISON,

ROSE COMSTOCK AND OLE OLSEN

Dated: July 25, 2006 HAGER & HEARNE

By / s / 

Treva Hearne

Attorney for Plaintiff ROBERT

SCHMIDT

///

Case 2:05-cv-01125-MCE -GGH Document 32 Filed 07/25/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

00443796.WPD

ORDER

Based upon the Stipulation between the parties, and good cause being shown, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order be modified so that the last day

to file dispositive motions is changed to November 30, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: July 25, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01125-MCE -GGH Document 32 Filed 07/25/06 Page 3 of 3