Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00781/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00781-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend their First Amended Complaint, 

filed on April 1, 2014.1 (Doc. 23.) Plaintiffs aver they have acquired information during the 

discovery process that requires amendment to the complaint in order to correct factual allegations and 

replace “doe” defendants with named defendants. (Doc. 23.) Defendants filed a statement of nonopposition to Plaintiff’s Motion. (Doc. 26.)

Having considered Plaintiffs’ Motion and Defendants’ non-opposition, as well as the Court’s 

obligation to “freely give leave to amend when justice so requires,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), this Court 

GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to amend their amended complaint. Within two (2) days of the date of 

 

1

The deadline to file a stipulation or motion to amend the pleadings was April 1, 2014. (Doc. 22.)

GEORGE V. RAMIREZ, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., 

Defendants.

/

Case No. 1: 13-cv-00781-LJO-BAM

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Case 1:13-cv-00781-LJO-BAM Document 27 Filed 04/18/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

this Order, Plaintiffs shall file the Second Amended Complaint which was attached to Plaintiffs’ 

Motion to Amend the First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 23, Attach. 2.) 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 18, 2014 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00781-LJO-BAM Document 27 Filed 04/18/14 Page 2 of 2