Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01807/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01807-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANTOS HATFIELD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1807 MCE EFB P

vs.

L. KARLTON,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed September 24, 2007, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis

affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do

so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has

now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma

pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

Case 2:07-cv-01807-MCE -EFB Document 5 Filed 11/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 19, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-01807-MCE -EFB Document 5 Filed 11/20/07 Page 2 of 2