Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04723/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04723-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes

---

NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C-05-4723 (MMC) 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KIRK E. TROST (State Bar # 127097) 

MADELINE E. MILLER (State Bar # 221568) 

MILLER, OWEN & TROST 

A Professional Corporation 

428 J Street, Suite 400 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 447-7933 

Facsimile: (916) 447-5195 

trost@motlaw.com 

madelinemiller@motlaw.com 

PAUL VALLE-RIESTRA, City Attorney (State Bar # 119321) 

MARGARET L. KOTZEBUE, Assistant City Attorney (State Bar # 148592) 

City of Walnut Creek 

P.O. Box 8039 

1666 North Main Street 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: (925) 943-5813 

Facsimile: (925) 256-3501 

VALLE-RIESTRA@ci.walnut-creek.ca.us 

Kotzebue@ci.walnut-creek.ca.us 

Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a 

California corporation doing business as SBC 

CALIFORNIA,

 Plaintiff and Petitioner, 

 v. 

THE CITY OF WALNUT CREEK and THE 

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 

WALNUT CREEK, 

 Defendants and Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 05 4723 MMC 

NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF HEARING 

ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

Original Hearing 

Date: October 13, 2006 

Continued Hearing

Date: December 8, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Court: Courtroom 7 

Judge: Maxine M. Chesney 

Dated: September 21, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Maxine M. Chesney

Case 3:05-cv-04723-MMC Document 88 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C-05-4723 (MMC) 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Pursuant to Local Rule 7-7 (a), the City of Walnut Creek and City Council of the City of Walnut 

Creek (referred to collectively as the “City”) hereby files this Notice of Continuance of the hearing date 

for the City’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. No opposition to the motion has 

been filed yet. The City is continuing the hearing and briefing on the motion in light of the legislation 

currently before Governor Schwarzenegger which, if signed into law, may affect the outcome of 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. The City seeks to conserve judicial 

resources, as well as the resources of all parties to this action, by continuing the hearing date. 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT the continued hearing will be held on December 8, 2006, at 

9:00 a.m., in courtroom 7 of the United States District Court, Northern District, located at 450 Golden 

Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Defendants City of Walnut Creek and City Council of the City 

of Walnut Creek (collectively, the “City”) will move, and hereby do move, the Court to dismiss 

Plaintiff’s First Claim for Relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The Motion 

seeks the following relief: that the Court dismiss the First Claim for Relief stated in the First Amended 

Complaint for failure to state a cause of action. 

DATED: September 21, 2006 

 Respectfully submitted, 

MILLER, OWEN & TROST 

 A Professional Corporation 

 s/Kirk E. Trost 

 Kirk E. Trost 

 Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents

Case 3:05-cv-04723-MMC Document 88 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 2