Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01299/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01299-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CURTIS LEE MORRISON (CSBN 321106) 

Red Eagle Law LC 

5256 S. Mission Road, Suite 135 

Bonsall, CA 92003 

Phone: (714)661-3446 

Email: curtis@redeaglelaw.com 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney 

ELLIOT C. WONG 

Assistant United States Attorney 

501 I St., Ste. 10-100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2764 

E-mail: elliot.wong@usdoj.gov 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LAILAA IQBAL, ET AL., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

ANTONY BLINKEN, ET AL., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-01299-KJM-KJN 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME OF PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 143 

District Court Judge Kimberly J. Mueller 

Defendants filed their Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment, Points and 

Authorities on December 11, 2023. ECF No. 24. Under Defendants’ view, looking at LR 230 and 260, 

Plaintiffs’ deadline to file an opposition to the motion is December 25, 2023. Under Plaintiffs’ view, 

looking to LR 261, Plaintiffs’ deadline to file an opposition to the motion is January 25, 2024. Basically, 

the parties disagree on whether this is an administrative record case. 

Case 2:23-cv-01299-KJM-CSK Document 29 Filed 01/05/24 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

However, Defendants have already interviewed one Beneficiary Plaintiff, and scheduled the 

remaining Beneficiary Plaintiffs for interviews on January 29, 2024 at US Embassy Islamabad, making it 

extremely likely that the matter will be moot before the briefing would be completed under either view. 

Thus, the parties stipulate to continuing Plaintiffs' deadline to respond to Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment until February 24, 2024. 

Dated: December 22, 2023 

/s/ Curtis Lee Morrison

Dated: December 22, 2023 

CURTIS LEE MORRISON 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

/s/ ELLIOT C. WONG 

ELLIOT C. WONG 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Counsel for Defendants

ORDER 

In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is 

extended to February 24, 2024. The motion hearing set for February 16, 2024, and Status (Pretrial 

Scheduling) Conference set for January 25, 2024, are hereby continued to March 29, 2024, at 10:00 AM 

in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before the undersigned, with the filing of a joint status report due 14 days prior. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 4, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-01299-KJM-CSK Document 29 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 2