Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00341/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00341-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LISA REGINA VIRGEN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0341 FCD DAD PS

vs.

SALLIE MAE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this action concerning her student loan. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local

Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On May 23, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. None of the

parties have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00341-FCD-DAD Document 53 Filed 06/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 23, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. The February 7, 2007 motion to dismiss filed by defendants Sallie Mae, Inc.

and General Revenue Corporation is granted and their motion in the alternative for more definite

statement is denied as moot;

3. Defendant Edfund’s February 7, 2007 motion to dismiss is granted and its

motion in the alternative for more definite statement is denied as moot;

4. To the extent that plaintiff has alleged any supplemental state claims not

preempted by the federal statutes relied upon by plaintiff, such claims are dismissed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3); and

5. This action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state any federal claim

upon which relief may be granted.

DATED: June 22, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00341-FCD-DAD Document 53 Filed 06/25/07 Page 2 of 2