Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01809/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01809-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 31:3731 Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 On November 27, 2006, plaintiff filed, without any accompanying explanation, a copy of 1

a receipt from a collection agency regarding plaintiff’s payment on a debt. This filing contains no

indication that plaintiff objects to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKA CHRISTINA ALFARO,

Plaintiff, 2:06-cv-1809-GEB-EFB-PS

vs.

U.S. BANK,

Defendant. ORDER

__________________________________/

On November 8, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.1

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-01809-GEB-EFB Document 10 Filed 12/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed November 8, 2006, are

ADOPTED; and,

2. This action is dismissed without leave to amend.

Dated: December 4, 2006

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01809-GEB-EFB Document 10 Filed 12/05/06 Page 2 of 2