Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-3_19-cv-00346/USCOURTS-ared-3_19-cv-00346-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud

---

IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

IN RE ELIJAH AND MARY 

STINY TRUSTS 

ORDER 

No. 3:19-cv-346-DPM 

The Court appreciates Mr. Lovett's attached letter, as well as Mr. 

House's professional courtesy. The duplicate motion, Doc. 216, will be 

disregarded. The brief, Doc. 222-1, is accepted as timely. And the 

adoption of the trustee's Rule 56.1 statement, Doc. 214, is approved. 

So Ordered. 

D.P. Marstall Jr. 

United States District Judge 

I 

Case 3:19-cv-00346-DPM Document 223 Filed 05/04/22 Page 1 of 3
Telephone 870-336-1900 

Law Offices of 

Glenn Lovett, Jr. PLC 

Attorney at Law 

256 Southwest Drive 

P. 0. Box 1575 

Jonesboro, Arkansas 72403-1575 

May 3, 2022 

Via email to: sherri_black@a.red.uscourts.gov 

Hon. D. Price Marshall, Jr. 

U. S. District Judge 

United States Courthourse 

600 West Capitol Ave. 

Little Rock, AR 72201 

Facsimile 870-336-1902 

RE: In the Matter of the Elijah G. and Mary Moore Stiny Trusts; 

U.S.D.C. Case No. 3:19-CV-00345-DPM 

Dear Judge Marshall: 

Opposing counsel, Mr. House, has today brought to my attention that late last Friday I 

electronically filed two Motions for Summary Judgment on behalf of my client, but failed to file a 

Memorandum Brief in Support of the Motion. I checked the file on PACER and he is correct. Both 

Document 215 and 216 are Motions for Summary Judgment and my Memorandum Brief was 

mistakenly not filed. I was out of state working on a laptop preparing the documents, and 

endeavoring to make the filing timely. Unfortunately I did not realize my error until Mr. House 

brought it to my attention today. I explained my mistake and emailed him this afternoon a copy of 

the Memorandum Brief that I intended to file Friday. 

He graciously understood my technical challenges and informed me I could advise the Court 

he had no objection to my taking whatever steps are necessary to correct the mistake. I am thus 

advising the Court of the situation by this letter and that I intend to file the Memorandum Brief as 

soon as possible, hopefully today. 

Mr. House also asked ifl had filed a separate Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute. 

In reply I explained that in my Motion I included a preliminary "Introduction", in which I explained 

that my client, Mr. Beauchamp, and I were aware that Petitioner Brant Perkins, Trustee, was in the 

process of preparing to file a Motion for Summary Judgment on his own behalf, that many of the 

points raised by Perkins in his motion and supporting exhibits were similar if not identical to the 

points we raise, and that I had included the following language: "we adopt and incorporate by 

reference those points, arguments and exhibits offered by Trustee Perkins as they are applicable to 

and supportive of this Motion for Summary Judgment..." 

In sum, I am asking the Court to accept my filing of the Memorandum Brief Support of 

Motion as being timely, and to accept my adoption and incorporation by reference of Trustee 

Perkins' filing as satisfactory as our Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute. 

Thank you very much for your consideration. 

Case 3:19-cv-00346-DPM Document 223 Filed 05/04/22 Page 2 of 3
cc: counsel of record. 

Very truly yours, 

Isl Glenn Lovett, Jr. 

Case 3:19-cv-00346-DPM Document 223 Filed 05/04/22 Page 3 of 3