Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_19-cv-01290/USCOURTS-azd-2_19-cv-01290-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ugly Pools USA Incorporated,

Plaintiff,

v. 

We Can Fix It Remodeling LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-19-01290-PHX-ESW

ORDER 

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. (Doc. 24.) The matter 

was referred to Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett for a Report and Recommendation. 

(Doc. 25.) On November 7, 2019, Magistrate Judge Willett filed a Report and 

Recommendation with this Court, recommending the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Default Judgment and enter an order permanently enjoining Defendants from using “We 

Fix Ugly Pools,” “We Fix Ugly Houses,” or any variation or combination of “We Fix Ugly” 

as a corporate name, company name, trade name, trademark, or service mark. (Id.) To date, 

no objections have been filed. 

I. STANDARD OF REVIEW 

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 

recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see Baxter v. 

Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). Parties have fourteen days from the service 

of a copy of the magistrate’s recommendation within which to file specific written 

objections to the Court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. Failure to object 

Case 2:19-cv-01290-ESW Document 26 Filed 01/07/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to a magistrate’s recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of the 

magistrate’s factual findings and waives all objections to those findings on appeal. See

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). A failure to object to a magistrate’s 

conclusion “is a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an 

issue on appeal.” Id.

II. DISCUSSION 

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Willett, and 

no objections having been made by any party thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and 

adopts Magistrate Judge Willett’s Report and Recommendation. 

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of 

Magistrate Judge Willett. (Doc. 25.) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. 

(Doc. 24.) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED permanently enjoining Defendants from using “We 

Fix Ugly Pools,” “We Fix Ugly Houses,” or any variation or combination of “We Fix Ugly” 

as a corporate name, company name, trade name, trademark, or service mark. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment 

accordingly. 

Dated this 6th day of January, 2020. 

Honorable Stephen M. McNamee

Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:19-cv-01290-ESW Document 26 Filed 01/07/20 Page 2 of 2