Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02201/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02201-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1

BARRY MORRIS, SBN #48368 

Attorney at Law 

1220 Oakland Blvd. #200 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

(925) 934-1100 

fax: (925) 934-1122 

barrymorris@mac.com

Attorney for Petitioner 

WILLIAM R. DYE 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

WILLIAM R. DYE, No. 2:12-cv-2201 TLN-EFB 

 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

 

FRED FOULK, Warden, 

 Respondent./ 

 

Stipulation and Order 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between BARRY MORRIS, attorney for 

petitioner, WILLIAN R. DYE, and MAX FEINSTAT, attorney for respondent FRED 

FOULK, that the hearing on respondent’s Motion to Dismiss be continued until 

October 8, 2014. This stipulation is based upon the attached declaration of 

BARRY MORRIS. 

Dated: August 7, 2014 

/s/ Barry Morris 

Attorney for Petitioner 

WILLIAM R. DYE 

 

/s/Max Feinstat 

Attorney for Respondent 

FRED FOULK 

Case 2:12-cv-02201-TLN-EFB Document 67 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 2
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2

Declaration of Barry Morris 

 I, BARRY MORRIS, do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the 

following is true and correct: 

 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the United States District 

Court for the Northern, Central, and Eastern Districts of California and the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and the United States 

Supreme Court. I represent the petitioner in the above-entitled action; 

 2. After counsel for Respondent and Petitioner set the date for the 

hearing of Respondent’s motion, counsel for petitioner realized that he had too 

many conflicting obligations to draft a response to the motion in the next two 

weeks, principally counsel must [1] finish reading and outlining the transcript in 

a death penalty appeal and [2] draft a reply brief in another death penalty case. 

Consequently counsel for Respondent agreed to continue the hearing on the 

motion for approximately 30 days. 

 Dated: August 7, 2014 

__________________________ 

BARRY MORRIS 

Attorney for Petitioner 

WILLIAM R. DYE 

Order 

 It is hereby ordered that the hearing on Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss in 

the above-entitled case be continued until October 8, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. 

Dated: August 7, 2014. 

Case 2:12-cv-02201-TLN-EFB Document 67 Filed 08/08/14 Page 2 of 2