Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04996/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04996-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING & EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE ADR NON-BINDING ARBITRATION

Brett A. Pedersen, SBN 146341 

BRETT PEDERSEN & ASSOCIATES 

Attorneys At Law 

One Maritime Plaza, Suite 400 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 434-3101 

Facsimile: (415) 434-6336 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AIRBORN OPERATING, L.P. 

VAUGHT & BOUTRIS, LLP 

John R. Vaught, SBN 114590 

Basil J. Boutris, SBN 122758 

Attorneys at Law 

80 Swan Way, Suite 320 

Oakland, CA 94621 

Telephone: (510) 430-1518 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MARVIN WILCHER, SHARISSE LANAUX, 

PREMIER FINANCIAL ASSOCIATES, and 

PREMIER CAPITAL INVESTORS 

Amy F. Sorenson, Esq. 

Timothy B. Schade, Esq. 

SNELL & WILMER LLP 

15. W. South Temple, Suite 1200 

Salt Lake City, UT 84101

Telephone: (801) 257-1900 

Facsimile: (801) 257-1800 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SUMMIT FINANCIAL RESOURCES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AIRBORN OPERATING, L.P., a Texas 

limited partnership, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

ERIK-A. ELECTRONICS, a California 

Corporation; TAYLOR ELECTRONICS, 

Inc., a business entity; form unknown; 

SHARISSE LANAUX; MARVIN 

WILCHER; PREMIER CAPITAL 

INVESTORS, a California Corporation; 

PREMIER FINANCIAL ASSOCIATES, 

a business entity, form unknown; 

SUMMIT FINANCIAL RESOURCES, 

L.P., a business entity, form unknown; 

CHARISSE LANAUX; and DOES 5 

through 10 

Defendants.

Case No. C 04-04996 JL ARB 

STIPULATION REQUESTING AN ORDER 

CHANGING & EXTENDING TIME TO 

COMPLETE ADR NON-BINDING 

ARBITRATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Judge: Hon. James Larson 

Dept: Courtroom F, 15th Floor 

Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 97 Filed 02/07/06 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING & EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE ADR NON-BINDING ARBITRATION

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, 

Plaintiff AIRBORN OPERATING L.P., Defendants SHARISSE LANAUX, MARVIN 

WILCHER, PREMIER FINANCIAL ASSOCIATES, PREMIER CAPITAL INVESTORS, and 

SUMMIT FINANCIAL RESOURCES submit the following Stipulation Requesting An Order 

Changing & Extending Time To Complete ADR Non-Binding Arbitration.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff AIRBORN OPERATING L.P. 

(“AirBorn”), Defendant SHARISSE LANAUX, Defendant MARVIN WILCHER, Defendant 

PREMIER FINANCIAL ASSOCIATES, Defendant PREMIER CAPITAL INVESTORS, and 

Defendant SUMMIT FINANCIAL RESOURCES by and through their respective attorneys of 

record in order to extend the time for all non-defaulting parties to complete Court ordered nonbinding Arbitration, as follows: 

1. The underlying Complaint for Damages (Demand for Jury Trial) was filed on 

November 24, 2004. 

2. The parties were assigned to mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution at the 

outset of this litigation in November 2004. 

3. On June 8, 2005, Plaintiff AIRBORN OPERATING L.P. filed a motion to amend 

its original complaint to join newly discovered additional party Defendants PREMIER CAPITAL 

INVESTORS, PREMIER FINANCIAL ASSOCIATES, AMBASSADOR ELECTRONICS, 

SUMMIT FINANCIAL RESOURCES, and CHARISSE LANAUX. Such motion noticed a 

hearing date of July 20, 2005.

4. On August 2, 2005, Judge Larson granted Plaintiff’s AIRBORN’s motion to 

amend without the necessity of hearing. Defendants PREMIER CAPITAL INVESTORS, 

PREMIER FINANCIAL ASSOCIATES, SHARISSE LANAUX, and MARVIN WILCHER filed 

answers to the first amended complaint on November 7, 2005 and Defendant SUMMIT 

FINANCIAL RESOURCES answered on December 12, 2005.

5. The ADR non-binding Arbitration deadline in the above captioned matter was 

January 31, 2006.

6. Pursuant to the January 24, 2006 teleconference coordinated and initiated by this 

Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 97 Filed 02/07/06 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING & EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE ADR NON-BINDING ARBITRATION

Court’s ADR Unit, the undersigned Plaintiff and Defendants and Arbitrator Thomas LoSavio 

stipulated to continue the deadline to complete the Court ordered non-binding Arbitration and to 

file such Stipulation with the Court before February 3, 2006.

7. Because of the issues surrounding the various individual and business entity 

defendants, assorted motions, and the recent joinder of Defendants PREMIER FINANCIAL 

ASSOCIATES, PREMIER CAPITAL INVESTORS, CHARISSE LANAUX and SUMMIT 

FINANCIAL RESOURCES, 1) the parties have not yet participated in a case management 

conference, 2) the original parties’ June 1, 2005 Joint Case Management Statement and Proposed 

Order are out-dated; 3) no current case management order is in place, 4) the parties proposed 

discovery plan has not been approved and ordered by the Court, and 5) as a result no formal 

discovery has taken place.

8. A stipulation requesting an order changing time for completion of the ADR nonbinding Arbitration deadline is necessary because of calendaring, case management, and 

discovery issues detailed in Paragraphs 1-7 of this Stipulation.

9. The undersigned Plaintiff and Defendants do freely stipulate to complete Court 

ordered non-binding Arbitration before July 31, 2006.

10. The undersigned Plaintiff and Defendants do freely stipulate to cooperate in 

choosing acceptable dates for participation in Court ordered non-binding Arbitration and 

coordinating such dates with Arbitrator Thomas LoSavio by February 16, 2006, 1 calendar day 

after the current February 15, 2006 case management conference. 

11. The undersigned Plaintiff and Defendants do freely stipulate that Arbitration 

Briefs shall be submitted 10 calendar days before the date chosen for participation in the Court 

ordered non-binding Arbitration.

12. This Stipulation to request an extension of time for all non-defaulting parties to 

complete Court ordered non-binding Arbitration shall have no other effect on the continued 

prosecution of this matter. 

///

///

Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 97 Filed 02/07/06 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING & EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE ADR NON-BINDING ARBITRATION

Dated: February _3_, 2006 BRETT PEDERSEN & ASSOCIATES 

By: Brett A. Pedersen 

Brett A. Pedersen 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AIRBORN OPERATING, L.P. 

Dated: February _2_, 2006 VAUGHT & BOUTRIS, LLP 

By: /s/ Jon R. Vaught 

Jon R. Vaught 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MARVIN WILCHER, SHARISSE LANAUX, 

PREMIER FINANCIAL ASSOCIATES, and 

PREMIER CAPITAL INVESTORS. 

Dated: February _3, 2006 SNELL & WILMER 

By: /s/ Amy F. Sorenson 

Amy F. Sorenson 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SUMMIT FINANCIAL RESOURCES. 

Dated: February 2, 2006 Thomas J. LoSavio, Esq.

By: /s/ Thomas J. LoSavio 

Thomas J. LoSavio, Esq. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of the attached stipulation, it is ORDERED, that the said stipulation 

be and hereby is approved and that the time for all non-defaulting parties to complete Court 

ordered non-binding Arbitration is hereby extended to and including the day of July 31, 2006.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:______________

Honorable James Larson 

United States District/ Magistrate Judge 

2/7/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Larson

Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 97 Filed 02/07/06 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING & EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE ADR NON-BINDING ARBITRATION

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

"conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 

Dated: February 3, 2005 BRETT PEDERSEN & ASSOCIATES 

By: Brett A. Pedersen 

Brett A. Pedersen 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AIRBORN OPERATING, L.P. 

Case 3:04-cv-04996-JL Document 97 Filed 02/07/06 Page 5 of 5