Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05618/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05618-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The Court notes that the time for the Salyer Defendants to serve responsive pleadings has

passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). Accordingly, on or before April 12, 2010, Plaintiffs shall file

the appropriate motion for entry of default as to the Salyer Defendants if they have not yet made an

appearance in the action.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Felisa Estrada, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

Salyer American Fresh Foods, et al.,

Defendants. /

NO. C 09-05618 JW 

ORDER VACATING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

This case is scheduled for a Case Management Conference on March 29, 2010. Pursuant to

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules of this Court, the parties conferred and duly

submitted a Joint Case Management Statement. (hereafter, “Statement,” Docket Item No. 92.) In

the Statement, Plaintiffs represent that the following parties were served on February 27, 2010, but

have yet to file responsive pleadings: (1) Salyer American Fresh Foods, Inc., (2) SK Frozen Foods,

LLC, (3) The Scott Salyer Revocable Trust, (4) Scott Salyer, individually and dba Salyer American

(collectively, “Salyer Defendants”). (Statement at 2.) Plaintiffs further represent that due to the

Salyer Defendants’ failure to appear,1

 the parties have not been able to conclude meaningful

discussions about issues pertaining to discovery, narrowing of issues, ADR, scheduling and trial. 

(Id.) The parties jointly request a continuance of the Case Management Conference until a date after

the Salyer Defendants have appeared. (Id.) 

Case 5:09-cv-05618-LHK Document 96 Filed 03/25/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

In light of the Salyer Defendants’ failure to appear, the Court VACATES the Case

Management Conference. In its Order addressing the pending Motions to Dismiss, the Court will set

a new Case Management Conference, if necessary, as to the Defendants who have made

appearances. 

Dated: March 24, 2010 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:09-cv-05618-LHK Document 96 Filed 03/25/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Bernard James Fitzpatrick bjfitzpatrick@fandslegal.com

Charles Swanston cswanston@fandslegal.com

Daniel F. Wake dwake@siwlegal.com

Joseph N. Demko JND@JMBM.com

Robert B. Kaplan rbk@jmbm.com

Robert E. Schaberg rschaberg@sflaw.com

Stephen Kirk Ingebretsen kirk@siwlegal.com

William G. Gaede wgaede@mwe.com

William Martin Woolman wwoolman@aalrr.com

Dated: March 24, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: /s/ JW Chambers 

Elizabeth Garcia

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:09-cv-05618-LHK Document 96 Filed 03/25/10 Page 3 of 3