Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520-187/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 On September 21, 2007, defendants filed a motion for an extension of time to file

objections to the findings and recommendations. On September 28, 2007, defendants filed

objections to the findings and recommendations. Good cause appearing, defendants’ motion for

extension of time will be granted and defendants’ objections deemed timely filed. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiffs are state prisoners proceeding through counsel with this class action

lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 11, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Defendants

have filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and plaintiffs have filed a response to

defendants’ objections.1

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 2451 Filed 10/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ September 21, 2007 motion for extension of time is granted;

2. Defendants’ September 28, 2007 objections to the September 11, 2007

findings and recommendations are deemed timely filed; 

3. The findings and recommendations filed September 11, 2007, are adopted in

full;

4. Plaintiffs’ July 25, 2007 motion to compel disputed fees and costs is granted in

part and denied in part; and

5. Within thirty days from the date of this order the parties shall meet and confer

concerning payment of attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by plaintiffs in connection with their

November 13, 2006 motion to convene a three-judge panel and their November 2, 2006 motion

for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction but not in connection with their July

13, 2006 motion to compel discovery. 

DATED: October 5, 2007.

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 2451 Filed 10/05/07 Page 2 of 2