Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05229/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05229-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

A.K. PARDEEP, RATNAKAR CASE NO. 15-cv-05229-EMC 

DEV, THOMAS ROBBINS, 

and MOODCAST, INC., STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

 v. 

 

SENTINEL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, LIMITED, 

 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________/ 

 

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

 Court Processes:

☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

☐ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

 Private Process:

 X Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediation at JAMS 

 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

 

 X other requested deadline June 30, 2016 

Dated: Jan. 29, 2016 /s/Brian R. Blackman__________ 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: Jan. 29, 2016 /s/ Ann K. Johnston_____________ 

 Attorney for Defendant 

Case 3:15-cv-05229-EMC Document 19 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER

☐ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

☐ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: __________________________________ 

 EDWARD M. CHEN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

x

2/9/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-05229-EMC Document 19 Filed 02/09/16 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION 

I, Brian R. Blackman, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being 

used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process. In compliance with 

Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Ann K. Johnston has concurred in this filing. 

DATED: January 29, 2016 BLAXTER | BLACKMAN LLP 

By:_________/s/Brian R. Blackman_____________ 

BRIAN R. BLACKMAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

A.K. PRADEEP, RATNAKAR DEV, THOMAS 

ROBBINS and MOODCAST, INC. 

Case 3:15-cv-05229-EMC Document 19 Filed 02/09/16 Page 3 of 3