Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05671/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05671-35/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTOR GUERRERO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION;

STATE PERSONNEL BOARD; et al., 

Defendants. /

No. C 13-05671 WHA

REQUEST FOR MORE

BRIEFING

At the time the parties submit responses to the opposing side’s proposed findings of fact

and conclusions of law, please add one page and address the following: What does our trial

record show as to what notices or other reaction the IRS sends an employer after the employer

reports wages and withholding to the IRS under a SSN not validly issued to the employee? One

reading of Professor Caroline Chen’s trial testimony is that the IRS does not notify the employer

of the invalid SSN (but this is an inference, not a direct statement). Furthermore, what does our

trial record show concerning the extent to which an employer typically learns that one of its

employees is reporting taxes under an ITIN, and when it does learn, is this a tip off that the

employee is using an invalid SSN?

Dated: July 7, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:13-cv-05671-WHA Document 250 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 1