Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02177/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02177-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation re Mtn to Remand 1

Laurence F. Padway, #89314

Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway

1516 Oak Street, Suite 109

Alameda, California 94501

Telephone: (510)814-0680

Facsimile : (510)814-0650

Attorneys for plaintiff

Marylyn Beaver

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran and Arnold

Rebecca A. Hull, #99802

Cari A. Cohorn, #249056

rebecca.hull@sdma.com

cari.cohorn@sdma.com

One Market Plaza

Stuart Towner, 8th Floor

San Francisco, California 94501

Telephone: (415) 781-7900

Facsimile: (415) 781-2635

Attorneys for Defendant Kaiser Foundation

Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan and

Real Party in Interest Metropolitan Life Insurance 

Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARYLYN BEAVER, No. C09-02177 WHA

Plaintiff,

vs. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING

BANK OF THE WEST SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN, and ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 

BANCWEST CORPORATION REMAND

WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, 

Defendants. Hon. William H. Alsup

______________________________/

METROPOLITAN LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Real Parties in Interest.

______________________________/

Case 3:09-cv-02177-WHA Document 35 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation re Mtn to Remand 2

Whereas, Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's motion to remand is due on January 28, 2010;

and

Whereas, counsel for plaintiff requires additional time because counsel for plaintiff is

working a reduced schedule for health and personal reasons,

Now, therefore, the parties stipulate to the following briefing schedule and hearing date:

February 4, 2010: Deadline for Plaintiff to file its opposition to Defendant's 

 Motion to Remand

February 11, 2010: Deadline for Defendant to file its Reply

February 25, 2010: Hearing Date

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: January 28, 2010

/s/_________________ /s/ ________________

Laurence F. Padway Rebecca A. Hull

Attorney for plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant and Real

Party in Interest

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: By: 

Honorable William H. Alsup

United States District Court Judge

January 29, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-02177-WHA Document 35 Filed 01/29/10 Page 2 of 2