Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01089/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01089-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSE LUIS MEJIA, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

ERIC HOLDER, et al., 

Respondents. 

No. 2:14-cv-1089-EFB P 

ORDER 

Petitioner proceeds without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2241. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to the parties’ consent. E.D. Cal. Local Rules, 

Appx. A, at (k). 

On April 23, 2015, respondents filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 

Petitioner has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition to respondent’s motion to 

dismiss. On June 2, 2015, the court warned petitioner that failure to respond to the motion could 

result in this action being dismissed.1

 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The time for acting has passed 

and petitioner has not filed an opposition, a statement of no opposition, or otherwise responded to 

 1

 Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of this order was returned, 

petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of 

his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record 

address of the party is fully effective. 

Case 2:14-cv-01089-EFB Document 18 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

the court’s order. Petitioner has disobeyed this court’s orders and failed to prosecute this action. 

The appropriate action is dismissal without prejudice. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110, 183(b). 

Dated: June 29, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-01089-EFB Document 18 Filed 06/30/15 Page 2 of 2