Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235-154/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 09-cv-05235-MMC 

ORDER SETTING SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Re: Dkt. No. 980

Before the Court is the parties’ “Joint Status Report and [Proposed] Supplemental 

Briefing Schedule,” filed June 24, 2016, in which each party proposes a schedule for 

briefing the issue of how the Supreme Court’s decision in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse 

Electronics, Inc., 579 U.S. __ (2016) impacts plaintiff’s pending “Renewed Motion 

Requesting a Declaration that this Case is Exceptional and for Award of Enhanced 

Damages and Attorneys’ Fees,” filed January 4, 2016. Having read and considered the 

parties’ respective proposals, the Court hereby sets the following supplemental briefing 

schedule:

1. Each party shall file, no later than twenty days after the Court rules on 

defendants’ “Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, New Trial, and/or 

Remittitur,” filed February 12, 2016, an opening brief not to exceed ten pages in length.

2. Each party shall file, no later than fourteen days after the deadline for opening 

briefs, a responsive brief not to exceed ten pages in length.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 28, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 981 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 1