Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02297/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02297-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO SAC

MASTER FILE NO. 04-2297-SC

1 C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\CNM\2717833_1.DOC 

DOUGLAS J. CLARK, State Bar No. 171499 

CYNTHIA A. DY, State Bar No. 172761 

CAMERON P. HOFFMAN, State Bar No. 229316 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

JENNY L. DIXON, State Bar No. 192638

CLAUDIA MAIN, State Bar No. 212200 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

One Market Street, Spear Tower, Suite 3300 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 947-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 947-2099 

Attorneys for Defendants 

OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

SHAW HONG, RAYMOND WU, H. GENE 

McCOWN and JOHN T. ROSSI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

This Document Relates To: 

CASE NOS. 04-2297-SC; 04-2298-SC; 04-2385-

SC; 04-2410-SC; 04-2419-SC; 04-2425-SC; 04-

2433-SC; 04-2474-SC; 04-2514-SC; 04-2525-

SC; and 04-2570-SC 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MASTER FILE NO.: C-04-2297 SC 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND 

TO SECOND CONSOLIDATED 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

)

)

Case 3:04-cv-02297-SC Document 146 Filed 09/06/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO SAC

MASTER FILE NO. 04-2297-SC

2 C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\CNM\2717833_1.DOC 

WHEREAS, on July 29, 2005, the Court issued its Order denying the Motion to Dismiss 

the Second Amended Consolidated Complaint (the “SAC”) filed by Defendants OmniVision 

Technologies, Inc., Shaw Hong, Raymond Wu, H. Gene McCown and John T. Rossi 

(collectively, “Defendants”);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Order dated August 3, 2005, Defendants’ response 

to the SAC is due on September 2, 2005; 

WHEREAS, Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs has agreed to extend the time within which 

Defendants’ response to the SAC shall be due; 

THEREFORE, the parties to this action, by and through their attorneys, hereby 

STIPULATE AND AGREE, subject to approval of the Court, that Defendants shall have until 

and including September 7, 2005 to respond to the SAC. 

Dated: September 2, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Claudia Main 

CLAUDIA MAIN 

Attorneys for Defendants OMNIVISION 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SHAW HONG, 

RAYMOND WU, H. GENE McCOWN and 

JOHN T. ROSSI 

Dated: September 2, 2005 MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD & 

SCHULMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Elizabeth P. Lin 

ELIZABETH P. LIN 

355 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 4170 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

 Telephone: (213) 617-1200

Facsimile: (213) 617-1975 

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Case 3:04-cv-02297-SC Document 146 Filed 09/06/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO SAC

MASTER FILE NO. 04-2297-SC

3 C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\CNM\2717833_1.DOC 

I, Claudia Main, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file this STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND 

CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with 

General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Elizabeth P. Lin has concurred in this filing.

By: /s/ Claudia Main 

CLAUDIA MAIN 

IT IS SO ORDERED:

 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court hereby orders: Defendants OmniVision 

Technologies, Inc., Shaw Hong, Raymond Wu, H. Gene McCown and John T. Rossi shall have 

until and including September 7, 2005 to respond to the Second Consolidated Amended 

Complaint. 

Dated: _____________________ ________________________________________ 

 Samuel Conti 

United States District Court Judge 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Samuel Conti

September 9, 2005

Case 3:04-cv-02297-SC Document 146 Filed 09/06/05 Page 3 of 3