Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02138/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02138-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL RENE PEREZ,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2138 LKK GGH P

vs.

DERRAL G. ADAMS, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 7, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-02138-LKK -GGH Document 27 Filed 08/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed Gaston v. Palmer, No. 01-56367, 2005 WL 1803261 (9th

Cir. Aug. 2, 2005) and finds that it does not change the outcome of the magistrate judge’s

findings and recommendations.

On July 28, 2005, petitioner filed a request for appointment of counsel. Because

the court orders this action dismissed, the request for appointment of counsel is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s July 28, 2005, request for appointment of counsel is denied;

2. The findings and recommendations filed July 7, 2005, are adopted in full; and

3. Respondent’s January 16, 2005, motion to dismiss is granted.

DATED: August 25, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/pere2138.805

Case 2:04-cv-02138-LKK -GGH Document 27 Filed 08/25/05 Page 2 of 2