Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00478/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00478-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

ANDREW S. TULUMELLO, SBN 196484

ATulumello@gibsondunn.com

1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20036-5306 

Telephone: 202.955.8500 

Facsimile: 202.467.0539

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

CHRISTOPHER CHORBA, SBN 216692

CChorba@gibsondunn.com

SAPNA D. PANDYA, SBN 266882

SPandya@gibsondunn.com

LAUREN M. BLAS, SBN 296823

LBlas@gibsondunn.com

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 

Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Facsimile: 213.229.7520

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 

TRENTON H. NORRIS, SBN 164781 

Trent.Norris@aporter.com 

SARAH ESMAILI, SBN 206053 

Sarah.Esmaili@aporter.com

Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415.471.3100 

Facsimile: 415.471.3400

Attorneys for Defendant PepsiCo, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

STACY SCIORTINO, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PEPSICO, INC., a North Carolina Corporation,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 14-CV-478-EMC,

consolidated for pre-trial purposes with 

Case Nos. 14-713, 14-1099, 14-1105, 

14-1192, 14-1193, 14-1316, 14-2023

PUTATIVE CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE-SETTING HEARING ON 

DEFENDANT PEPSICO, INC.’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 

CONSOLIDATED AMENDED 

COMPLAINT FROM JANUARY 29, 2015 

TO FEBRUARY 12, 2015

The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

Case 3:14-cv-00478-EMC Document 91 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, on August 25, 2014, Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2014, Defendant PepsiCo, Inc. filed its Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint 

is presently scheduled to be heard on January 29, 2015 at 1:30 p.m.;

WHEREAS, due to a scheduling conflict of certain defense counsel, the parties have agreed 

to seek to re-set the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss from January 29, 2015 to February 

12, 2015; and

WHEREAS, this stipulation will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already 

fixed by the Court or the parties;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate that, subject to Court approval, the hearing on 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint shall be re-set to 

February 12, 2015 at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court may order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: January 21, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP

By:/s/ Trenton H. Norris

TRENTON H. NORRIS

Attorneys for Defendant PepsiCo, Inc.

Dated: January 21, 2015 PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP

By: /s/ Daniel L. Warshaw

DANIEL L. WARSHAW

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP

By: /s/ Marc L. Godino

MARC GODINO

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 3:14-cv-00478-EMC Document 91 Filed 01/21/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, I, Trenton H. Norris, attest that all signatories listed, and 

on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.

/s/ Trenton H. Norris

Trenton H. Norris

Case 3:14-cv-00478-EMC Document 91 Filed 01/21/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

ORDER

Having considered the parties’ stipulation, the Court hereby orders that the hearing on 

Defendant PepsiCo, Inc’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint is re-set 

to February 12, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. The previously scheduled hearing date of January 29, 2015 for 

Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint is vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________________ ______________________________

Hon. Edward M. Chen

United States District Court Judge

1/21/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-00478-EMC Document 91 Filed 01/21/15 Page 4 of 4