Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03213/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03213-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:552 Right to Privacy Act

---

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FE

PA

sub

app

De

No

res

pre

Da

ERNANDO 

v. 

ATRICK R. 

On Oct

bmit a writte

pear at the ca

efendants. [D

ovember 17, 

sponded to th

ejudice for fa

IT IS S

ated: March 

MATTO, 

Plaintiff, 

DONAHOE

Defendants

tober 30, 201

en statement 

ase managem

Docket No. 6

2014 “may r

he Order to S

ailure to pros

SO ORDER

24, 2015 

UNITED

NORTHER

E, et al., 

s. 

14, the court

by no later t

ment confere

6.] The Ord

result in dism

Show Cause

secute. 

RED. 

D STATES D

RN DISTRIC

t issued an O

than Novem

ence held on

der to Show C

missal of thi

. According

___

DISTRICT C

CT OF CALI

Case No. 1

ORDER O

PREJUDI

PROSECU

Order to Show

mber 17, 2014

n October 29

Cause stated

is action.” Id

gly, this matt

__________

 Un

COURT 

IFORNIA 

14-cv-03213

OF DISMISS

CE FOR FA

UTE 

w Cause, ins

4 explaining

9, 2014 and f

d that failure 

Id. To date, P

ter is hereby

___________

Donna M. 

nited States M

3-DMR 

SAL WITH

AILURE TO

structing Pla

g Plaintiff’s f

failure to ser

to respond b

Plaintiff has

y dismissed w

__________

Ryu 

Magistrate J

HOUT 

O

aintiff to 

failure to 

rve 

by 

s not 

without 

________ 

Judge 

Case 4:14-cv-03213-DMR Document 8 Filed 03/24/15 Page 1 of 1