Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02595/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02595-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHEILA GOODEN, an individual,

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD

v.

SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., a ORDER

Virginia Corporation; and 

SUNTRUST BANK, INC., a Georgia

Corporation,

Defendants.

 /

This matter came before the court on January 4, 2013, for hearing of plaintiff

Sheila Gooden’s motion to compel discovery. (Doc. No. 41.) Attorney Eric Buescher appeared

on behalf of plaintiff Sheila Gooden and attorney Philip Barilovits appeared on behalf of

defendant Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.

Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments on file and at the hearing, and for

the reasons set forth in detail on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s December 5, 2012 motion to compel, (Doc. No. 41), is granted

subject to the protective order already in place, except as to the redacted account numbers which

may remain redacted;

1

Case 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD Document 44 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2. Defendant shall have ten days from the date of service of this order to produce

the discovery responses at issue; and

3. Plaintiff’s request for sanctions is denied.

DATED: January 4, 2013.

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.civil\gooden2595.oah.010413

2

Case 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD Document 44 Filed 01/07/13 Page 2 of 2