Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-00037/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-00037-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. CV 09-0037-CW 

sf-2864502 

GORDON P. ERSPAMER (CA SBN 83364)

GErspamer@mofo.com 

TIMOTHY W. BLAKELY (CA SBN 242178) 

TBlakely@mofo.com 

ADRIANO HRVATIN (CA SBN 220909) 

AHrvatin@mofo.com 

STACEY M. SPRENKEL (CA SBN 241689) 

SSprenkel@mofo.com 

DANIEL J. VECCHIO (CA SBN 253122) 

DVecchio@mofo.com 

DIANA LUO (CA SBN 233712) 

DLuo@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Vietnam Veterans of America; Swords to Plowshares: 

Veterans Rights Organization; Bruce Price; Franklin D. 

Rochelle; Larry Meirow; Eric P. Muth; David C. Dufrane; 

and Wray C. Forrest 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. CV 09-0037-CW

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME & 

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 

Complaint filed January 7, 2009 

Case 4:09-cv-00037-CW Document 111 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. CV 09-0037-CW 1

sf-2864502 

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Enlarge Time and for Administrative Relief in CV 09-0037 came 

before this Court on June 29, 2010. 

After considering the moving papers, declarations and other submissions, and all other 

matters presented to the Court, this Court finds that FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN: Plaintiffs are 

granted a two-week enlargement of time to file their Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Leave to File Third Amended Complaint and a page-limit extension of five pages for that Reply. 

The hearing to address Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint is 

vacated. 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED. 

Dated: 7/1/2010

_______________ ____________

The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

Judge, United States District Court 

for the Northern District of California 

Case 4:09-cv-00037-CW Document 111 Filed 07/01/10 Page 2 of 2