Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-02442/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-02442-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Claudia Patricia Sosa-Casasola,

Petitioner, 

vs.

Eric H. Holder, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIV-13-2442-PHX-SRB (MHB)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

TO THE HONORABLE SUSAN R. BOLTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

Petitioner Claudia Patricia Sosa-Casasola (A205-415-708), who is represented by

counsel, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc.

1). Petitioner seeks an order granting her a bond hearing before an IJ as provided in

Rodriguez v. Robbins, 715 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2013).

On January 7, 2014, Respondents filed a Notice to Court and Suggestion of Mootness

demonstrating that on January 2, 2014, Petitioner was removed from the United States

pursuant to the IJ’s April 11, 2013 Order of Removal. (Doc. 11, Exh. 1.) Thus, it appearing

that Petitioner is no longer in custody and that there is no longer a live case or controversy

in this matter, the Court issued an Order to show cause requiring Petitioner to show cause

why this action should not be dismissed as moot.

Case 2:13-cv-02442-SRB Document 14 Filed 01/16/14 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

On January 15, 2014, Petitioner, through counsel, filed a Motion to Dismiss conceding

that, in light of Petitioner’s removal from the United States, her Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is now moot.

Accordingly, in light of Petitioner’s removal and it appearing that no case or

controversy remains, the Court will recommend that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus be dismissed as moot.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) be DISMISSED as moot and without

prejudice;

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13)

be DENIED as moot.

This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth

Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of

Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district court’s judgment. The

parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation

within which to file specific written objections with the Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);

Rules 72, 6(a), 6(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Thereafter, the parties have fourteen

days within which to file a response to the objections. Failure timely to file objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the Report

and Recommendation by the district court without further review. See United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Failure timely to file objections to any

factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered a waiver of a party’s right

to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the

Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. See Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

\\\

\\\

\\\

Case 2:13-cv-02442-SRB Document 14 Filed 01/16/14 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 3 -

DATED this 16th day of January, 2014.

Case 2:13-cv-02442-SRB Document 14 Filed 01/16/14 Page 3 of 3