Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01039/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01039-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

YATES, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 05 1039 AWI SMS P 

ORDER DISREGARDING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT

SANCTIONS (Doc. 6.) 

 William Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On November 7, 2006, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint with leave to amend

and granted Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to comply. On December 12, 2006, Plaintiff

submitted an Amended Complaint and also moved to proceed without sanctions for what he

deemed an untimely submission. 

Case 1:05-cv-01039-SMS Document 7 Filed 12/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff’s motion is unnecessary. First, the Court did not issue an Order to show cause

why sanctions should not be imposed. Second, should Plaintiff need more time, he need only

move for an extension of time, even if he submits the expected pleading at the same time. This

would serve to extend the deadline for however many days needed to make the submission

timely. 

In light of the above, the Court HEREBY ORDERS the Motion for Leave to Proceed

Without Sanctions is DISREGARDED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 13, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01039-SMS Document 7 Filed 12/13/06 Page 2 of 2