Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-03577/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-03577-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

Case No.: 5:12-cv-03577-EJD

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DANETTE M. MOORE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PETSMART, INC,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:12-cv-03577-EJD 

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS 

FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

Re: Dkt. Nos. 91, 92

Presently before the court are Plaintiffs Jeanette Negrete, Alanna Harrison, Alisa Valdez, 

Danette Moore, and Latresa Myers’ Motions for Attorneys’ Fees. See Dkt. Nos. 91, 92. Pursuant 

to local guidelines, requests for approval of attorneys’ fees awards must include detailed lodestar 

information, even if the requested amount is based on a percentage of the settlement fund. See

Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements, United States District Court, Northern District 

of California, http://cand.uscourts.gov/ClassActionSettlementGuidance.

Accordingly, on or before March 9, 2015 at 2:00 p.m., Plaintiffs shall lodge with the 

court, but shall not file, a copy of all billing records supporting the request for attorneys’ fees. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 5, 2015 

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:12-cv-03577-EJD Document 108 Filed 03/05/15 Page 1 of 1