Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06443/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06443-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

G:\docs\ATimken\Orders To Be Signed\99cv6443.o.re.xiv.pretrial.doc 1 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

REQUEST FOR ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT IN SECTION XIV B 2 OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER 

AND ORDER THEREON 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Howard A. Sagaser #072492 

Michael S. Helsley #199103 

SAGASER, JONES & HELSLEY

2445 Capitol Street, 2nd Floor 

Post Office Box 1632 

Fresno, California 93717-1632 

Telephone: (559) 233-4800 

Facsimile: (559) 233-9330 

William C. Hahesy, #105743 

LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY

225 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 105 

Fresno, CA 93704 

Telephone (559) 579-1230 

Facsimile (559) 579-1231 

Email: bill@hahesylaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant Nibco, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARTHA RIVERA, MAO HER, 

ALICIA ALVAREZ, EVA ARRIOLA, 

PEUANG BOUNNHONG, CHHOM 

CHAN, BEE LEE, PAULA 

MARTINEZ, MARIA MEDINA, MAI 

MEEMOUA, MARGARITA 

MENDOZA, BAO NHIA MOUA, 

ISIDRA MURILLO, MARIA 

NAVARRO, VATH RATTANATAY, 

OFELIA RIVERA, SARA RIVERA, 

MARIA RODRIGUEZ, MARIA RUIZ, 

MARIA VALDIVIA, SY VANG, 

YOUA XIONG, and SEE YANG, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NIBCO, INC., an Indiana corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. CIV F-99 6443 OWW SMS 

ORDER RE REQUIREMENTS IN 

SECTION XIV B OF PRETRIAL 

CONFERENCE ORDER 

Trial Date: October 7, 2008 

Judge: Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 

/// 

/// 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Document 498 Filed 08/29/08 Page 1 of 2
G:\docs\ATimken\Orders To Be Signed\99cv6443.o.re.xiv.pretrial.doc 2 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

REQUEST FOR ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT IN SECTION XIV B 2 OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER 

AND ORDER THEREON 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to the conference call with the Court and counsel on August 26, 2008, 

defendant Nibco submits this proposed order: 

1. As set forth in the Joint Pretrial Conference Statement, in Section 21 at pages 

165 and 166, the parties set forth the procedure that they intended to use for marking of the 

exhibits and the Court has agreed to adopt those procedures for purposes of the trial. The 

relevant portion of Section 21 of the Joint Pretrial Conference Statement states as follows: 

“Defendant Nibco has already marked its exhibits. The exhibits are marked 

using Letters and, if appropriate, followed by a numerical reference (i.e, 

Defendant Exhibit A-1.) The Plaintiffs will mark their exhibits using 

Numbers and any further identifiers as they deem appropriate. The Parties 

have agreed to use this exhibit marking approach.” 

2. The Court has agreed to adopt the parties’ procedure for the marking of Exhibits 

and thus agrees that the provisions of Section XIV. B 1 and 2 of the Pretrial Conference Order 

shall be superseded by the provisions set forth above. The parties are still obligated to meet 

and conduct a joint exhibit conference and are currently seeking to schedule a time and place 

for that conference to examine each others’ exhibits and prepare a final exhibit list. 

3. The Court hereby orders that the provisions of Section XIV. B 1 and 2 are 

superseded by the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 above. 

DATED: August 28, 2008 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER

Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Document 498 Filed 08/29/08 Page 2 of 2