Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00809/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00809-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KELLYE C. BROTHERS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF )

CALIFORNIA, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-00809-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 20)

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 15)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 10)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On April 25, 2007, Petitioner filed an amended petition. (Doc. 10). On February 4, 2008,

Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the amended petition. (Doc. 15). On July 24, 2008, the

Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and Recommendations recommending that the

motion to dismiss be granted and that the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus be

DISMISSED as untimely pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). (Doc. 20). The Findings and

Recommendations was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

Case 1:05-cv-00809-AWI-TAG Document 21 Filed 08/20/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. To date, Petitioner has not filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis.

Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued July 24, 2008 (Doc. 20), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 15), is GRANTED;

3. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 10) is DISMISSED as

untimely; and,

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 18, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00809-AWI-TAG Document 21 Filed 08/20/08 Page 2 of 2