Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01455/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01455-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY W. CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. KATHLEEN BUTZ, et al.,

Defendants.

CIV S-03-1455 LKK PAN PS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

—NFN—

 On July 20, plaintiff filed a brief wherein plaintiff states

he “must withdrew [sic] [h]is civil rights claim before Judge

Peter Nowinski” because plaintiff should “try to save the sight

of his left eye rather than try to press his claim in [this]

court” and “each Defendant would be best served for Plaintiff to

re-file in State court, since it appears to plaintiff such is the

correct route to CERT.” There is no opposition to the request.

 The court recommends that plaintiff’s request to dismiss

this action be granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

Case 2:03-cv-01455-LKK -PAN Document 44 Filed 08/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the

Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton, the United States District Judge

assigned to this case. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Written

objections may be filed within ten days after being served with

these findings and recommendations. The document should be

captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” The failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s

order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: August 4, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01455-LKK -PAN Document 44 Filed 08/05/05 Page 2 of 2