Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02667/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02667-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUTH LaTOURELLE, No. CIV S-10-2667-MCE-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

TERRY BARBER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. Pending before

the court is defendants’ request (Doc. 30) for an extension of time to respond to any second

amended complaint plaintiff may file in compliance with the court’s March 29, 2012, order. In

that order, the District Judge dismissed the operative pleading and directed plaintiff to file a

second amended complaint within 30 days of the date of the order setting forth all remaining

claims in a single pleading. Good cause appearing therefor, defendants’ request for an extension

of time will be granted. If plaintiff files a second amended complaint by the deadline imposed in

the March 29, 2012, order, defendants’ response shall be due by May 31, 2012. If plaintiff does

not file a timely second amended complaint as directed, defendants shall not be required to take

any further action unless otherwise ordered. 

Case 2:10-cv-02667-DOC Document 31 Filed 04/26/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, if plaintiff filed a timely second

amended complaint, defendants’ response thereto shall be due by May 31, 2012. 

DATED: April 25, 2012

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-02667-DOC Document 31 Filed 04/26/12 Page 2 of 2