Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03364/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03364-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SARA B. BRODY (Bar No. 130222) 

HOWARD S. CARO (Bar No. 202082) 

MICHAEL E. LIFTIK (Bar No. 232430) 

MADELEINE LOH (Bar No. 233388) 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

333 Bush Street 

San Francisco, California 94104-2878 

Telephone: +1.415.772.6000 

Facsimile: +1.415.772.6268 

Attorneys for Defendants 

NETOPIA, INC., ALAN B. LEFKOF, 

and DAVID A. KADISH 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IN RE NETOPIA, INC. SECURITIES 

LITIGATION 

_______________________________________

This Document Relates to: All Actions 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 04-3364 RMW 

And Related Cases 

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER REGARDING 

DEFENDANTS TIME TO REPLY 

TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO 

DISMISS AND LENGTH OF BRIEF

*E-FILED - 11/16/05*

Case 5:04-cv-03364-RMW Document 98 Filed 11/16/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

 

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO REPLY TO OPPOSITION 

TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND LENGTH OF BRIEF – C-04-3364 (RMW) 

1

 WHEREAS, on August 29, 2005, Defendants Alan B. Lefkof, David A. Kadish, and 

Netopia, Inc. Filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative to Strike 

Allegations From, Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint; 

 WHEREAS, on August 29, 2005, Defendant Thomas A. Skoulis filed a Notice of Joinder 

and Joinder of Defendant Thomas Skoulis to Defendants’ Pending Notice of Motion and Motion to 

Dismiss and/or in the Alternative to Strike Allegations from Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended 

Complaint; 

 WHEREAS, on September 6, 2005, Defendant William D. Baker filed a Notice of Joinder 

and Joinder to Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative to Strike 

Allegations from, Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint, and a Notice of Motion and 

Motion to Dismiss Allegations from Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint and, 

Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof; 

 WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to the above-referenced Motions to Dismiss 

of Defendants Netopia, Lefkof, Kadish, Skoulis and Baker on October 13, 2005; 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to prior stipulation, Defendants’ Replies to Lead Plaintiffs’ 

Opposition to the Motions to Dismiss are presently due on November 14, 2005; 

 WHEREAS, a hearing for the Motions to Dismiss is scheduled before this Court on 

December 9, 2005. 

 WHEREAS, Defendants have requested, and Lead Plaintiffs have agreed that, in order to 

accommodate the schedules of Defendants’ counsel, Defendants’ Replies to Lead Plaintiffs’ 

Opposition to the Motions to Dismiss shall be due November 18, 2005, which date complies with 

Local Rule 7-3(c); 

 WHEREAS, Defendants have requested, and Lead Plaintiffs have agreed, that in order to 

preserve judicial resources and to avoid making duplicative arguments in multiple briefs, 

Defendants Netopia, Inc., Alan Lefkof and David Kadish may file a consolidated Reply in Further 

Support of their Motions do Dismiss that will not exceed 20 pages in length; 

 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the parties, 

subject to the Order of the Court, that Defendants’ Replies to Lead Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the 

Motions to Dismiss shall be filed on or before November 18, 2005, and that Defendants Netopia, 

Case 5:04-cv-03364-RMW Document 98 Filed 11/16/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

 

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO REPLY TO OPPOSITION 

TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND LENGTH OF BRIEF – C-04-3364 (RMW) 

2

Inc., Alan Lefkof, and David Kadish may file a single Reply Brief to Lead Plaintiffs’ Opposition to 

the Motions to Dismiss not to exceed 20 pages in length. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: November 10, 2005 By: /s/ (with express authorization) .

 SCHATZ & NOBEL, P.C. 

 ANDREW M. SCHATZ 

 JEFFREY S. NOBEL 

 JUSTIN S. KUDLER 

 One Corporate Center 

 20 Church Street, Suite 1700 

 Hartford, Connecticut 06103 

 (860) 493-6292 

 Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs 

Dated: November 10, 2005 By: __/s/________________________ 

 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

 SARA B. BRODY 

 HOWARD S. CARO 

 MICHAEL E. LIFTIK 

 333 Bush Street 

 San Francisco, CA 94104 

 (415) 772-6000 

 Counsel for Defendants Netopia, Inc., 

 Alan B. Lefkof, and David A. Kadish 

Dated: November 10, 2005 By: /s/ (with express authorization) .

 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

 SUSAN D. RESLEY 

 1000 Marsh Road 

 Menlo Park, California 94025 

 (650) 614-7400 

 Counsel for Defendant William D. Baker 

Dated: November 10, 2005 By: /s/ (with express authorization) .

 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 

 ANTHONY PACHECO 

 2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor 

 Los Angeles, California 90067-3206 

 (310) 557-2900 

 Counsel for Defendant Thomas A. Skoulis 

Case 5:04-cv-03364-RMW Document 98 Filed 11/16/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

 

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO REPLY TO OPPOSITION 

TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND LENGTH OF BRIEF – C-04-3364 (RMW) 

3

ORDER

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Replies to Lead Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motions 

to Dismiss shall be filed on or before November 18, 2005, and that Defendants Netopia, Inc., Alan 

Lefkof, and David Kadish may file a single Reply Brief to Lead Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the 

Motions to Dismiss not to exceed 20 pages in length. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

DATED: ____________, 2005 _________________________________ 

HON. RONALD M. WHYTE 

 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

11/16 /S/ RONALD M. WHYTE

Case 5:04-cv-03364-RMW Document 98 Filed 11/16/05 Page 4 of 4