Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00757/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00757-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

N:\Pro - Se\8.29.2007\06-0757 Alexander757_dismiss-41b.wpd

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERMAINE LAMONT

ALEXANDER,

Petitioner,

 vs.

RAUL MARTINEZ, Warden,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-00746 JW (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On January 9, 2006, petitioner filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner sought to proceed in forma

pauperis. The court, by order filed September 21, 2006, denied the motion to

proceed in forma pauperis because the application was incomplete; instead of

including a certificate of funds signed by an authorized prison official, petitioner

signed the certificate himself. The court extended the time for petitioner to submit a

completed certificate of funds or pay the filing fee, and granted him thirty days from

the date of the order to do so. A copy of that order to petitioner was returned as

undeliverable on October 11, 2006, and it was indicated that petitioner was no

Case 5:06-cv-00757-JW Document 22 Filed 08/29/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

N:\Pro - Se\8.29.2007\06-0757 Alexander757_dismiss-41b.wpd 2

longer in custody. The court ordered petitioner on January 18, 2007 to file a notice

of his current address and his continued intent to prosecute no later than 30 days

from the date of the order. The court stated that failure to file would result in the

dismissal of the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 

On February 7, 2007, the post office returned the court’s mail to petitioner as

undeliverable. Because sixty (60) days have passed since the court’s mail to

petitioner was returned as undeliverable, and the court has received no written

communication from petitioner indicating a current address, the case is DISMISSED

without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 3-11(b).

DATED: August 27, 2007 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-00757-JW Document 22 Filed 08/29/07 Page 2 of 2