Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-05-03693/USCOURTS-ca8-05-03693-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

Nos. 05-3693, 06-2054/2055/2056/2564

___________

Jimmy Shane Cantrell, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeals from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Grant Harris, Warden, Varner Unit, *

ADC; Larry Norris, Director, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Arkansas Department of Correction; *

G. Moore, Captain, Varner Unit, ADC; *

John Doe; Marshall Gender, Varner *

Unit, ADC; Teresa Conrad, Ms., Varner *

Unit, ADC; Janice Metcalf, Varner Unit,*

ADC; Tamara Hammock, Ms., Varner *

Unit, ADC; Tim Moncrief, Assistant *

Warden, Varner Unit, ADC; James, *

Mr., Varner Unit, ADC; Judy *

Hathaway, Grievance Office, Varner *

Unit, ADC; Thomas Hurst, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: March 29, 2007

Filed: April 10, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 05-3693 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/10/2007 Entry ID: 3297251
1

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Arkansas, as to some orders adopting the report and

recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge

for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

-2-

In these five consolidated appeals, Arkansas inmate Jimmy Shane Cantrell

(Cantrell) appeals several of the district court’s1

 prejudgment orders and the ultimate

dismissal order entered after an evidentiary hearing in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.

He also moves for appointment of counsel. After a de novo review, see Randle v.

Parker, 48 F.3d 301, 303 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review), we conclude the

dismissal of Cantrell’s complaint was proper. We further conclude the other orders

resulted in no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm in all five appeals. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny the

pending motions for counsel. 

______________________________

Appellate Case: 05-3693 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/10/2007 Entry ID: 3297251