Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-324/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-03561 WHA

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE

Oracle is hereby requested to respond to Google’s contention that “Oracle simply

misrepresents what Google’s experts have said” regarding alleged inconsistencies between the

respective positions taken by Google’s experts on fair use and damages (Dkt. No. 1543 at 2). 

Oracle’s response shall include as attachments the reports in question and shall set forth the

quotations demonstrating the specific inconsistencies alleged and pincites for the quoted

language. The response is due by FRIDAY, MARCH 25 AT NOON. Oracle’s response shall not

include any replies to any other issues.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2016. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1544 Filed 03/22/16 Page 1 of 1