Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04793/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04793-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY WAYNE CHISMAN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

COUNTY OF DEL NORTE, CALIFORNIA, et

al.,

Defendants

 /

No. C-08-4793 MMC

SECOND ORDER DIRECTING

PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS

COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On January 29, 2010, plaintiff electronically filed his opposition to defendants’ motion

for summary judgment, as well as two declaration in support thereof. Plaintiff has violated

General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the

Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are

filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically

. . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number,

and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing

Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

documents.

Case 3:08-cv-04793-MMC Document 27 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court has previously advised plaintiff of his failure to comply with General Order

45 and the Court’s Standing Order in connection with earlier-filed documents. (See Order,

filed December 10, 2008.) Such reminder appears to have had little to no effect on

compelling compliance therewith.

Parties are expected to comply with court rules without repeated reminders. 

Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby advised that the Court will impose sanctions, including, but

not limited to, striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a

chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04793-MMC Document 27 Filed 02/03/10 Page 2 of 2