Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alsd-1_12-cv-00566/USCOURTS-alsd-1_12-cv-00566-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DRAPER FRANK WOODYARD, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 12-0566-WS-N

 )

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF )

CORRECTIONS, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation (“R&R”) of the 

Magistrate Judge and the objections of the plaintiff thereto. (Docs. 67, 69).1 After due 

and proper consideration of all portions of the file deemed relevant to the issues raised, 

and after de novo review of the petitioner’s objections, the R&R made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(3) and dated August 22, 2014 is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ordered that:

1. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (29-31), is denied as to the 

plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure-to-protect claim against defendant David Leggett in 

his individual capacity;

2. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted as to all other 

claims, which are dismissed with prejudice; and

3. The plaintiff’s motion for order of judgment, (Doc. 47), construed as a motion 

for sanctions, is denied.

DONE and ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2014. 

 

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 1 The plaintiff has filed a motion to amend his objection. (Doc. 70). To the extent the 

plaintiff seeks to clarify that he does not object to the grant of summary judgment as to defendant 

Givens, (id. at 2), the motion is granted. To the extent the plaintiff seeks leave to file future, 

additional objections to the R&R, or seeks any other relief, the motion is denied. 

Case 1:12-cv-00566-WS-N Document 71 Filed 09/26/14 Page 1 of 1