Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_13-cv-00685/USCOURTS-almd-2_13-cv-00685-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1001 E.R.I.S.A.

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

GARNET TURNER

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated, et al.,

)

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

CASE NO. 2:13-CV-685-WKW

(WO)

ALLSTATE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

)

)

)

Defendant. )

JOHN E. KLAAS

on behalf of himself and all others 

similarly situated, et al.,

)

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-406-WKW

(WO)

ALLSTATE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

)

)

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the parties’ joint motion to extend deadlines for expert 

disclosures (Doc. # 181) is GRANTED. 

Further, it is ORDERED that Sections 2 and 8 of the Uniform Scheduling 

Order (Doc. # 149), as amended (Doc. # 172), are amended as follows:

Case 2:13-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 185 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 3
2

SECTION 2: Dispositive Motions. Dispositive motions, e.g., 

motions for summary judgment, shall be filed no later than 

September 20, 2017. A brief and all supporting evidence shall be 

filed with any such motion. In all briefs filed by any party relating to 

the motion, the discussion of the evidence in the brief must be 

accompanied by a specific reference, by page and line, to where the 

evidence can be found in a supporting deposition or document. Failure 

to make such specific reference may result in the evidence not being 

considered by the court. 

Daubert motions shall be filed on or before June 19, 2017, unless the 

deadline is modified by the court upon motion of a party 

demonstrating good cause.

SECTION 8: Expert Witness Disclosures. The parties shall disclose 

to each other the identity of ANY person who may be used at trial to 

present evidence under Rules 701, 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal 

Rules of Evidence, and provide the reports of retained experts or 

witnesses whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involved 

giving expert testimony, as required by Rule 26(a)(2)(A), (B), and (C) 

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as follows:

from the plaintiff(s), on or before April 19, 2017, and

from the defendant(s), on or before April 19, 2017.

Expert rebuttal reports within the meaning of Fed. R. Civ. P. 

26(a)(2)(D), i.e., expert reports that solely contradict or rebut evidence 

on the same subject matter identified by an opposing party’s expert 

disclosure under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) or (C), shall be disclosed no later 

than May 19, 2017.

The parties shall comply fully with all requirements of Rule 26(a)(2) 

in regard to disclosure of expert testimony. Unless an objection is 

filed within 14 days after disclosure of any expert witness, the 

disclosure shall be deemed to be in full compliance with the Rule.

Case 2:13-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 185 Filed 02/14/17 Page 2 of 3
3

All other provisions of the Uniform Scheduling Order (Doc. # 149), as amended 

(Doc. # 172), remain in full force and effect.

DONE this 14th day of February, 2017. 

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:13-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 185 Filed 02/14/17 Page 3 of 3