Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00971/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00971-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MIL HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JANENE P. BASSETT, Cal. Bar No. 197722 

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600 

Los Angeles, California 90067-6017 

Telephone: 310-228-3700 

Facsimile: 310-228-3701 

E-mail: jbassett@sheppardmullin.com

(Designated Counsel for Service) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

CALPHALON CORPORATION 

K. LYNN FINATERI, Cal. Bar No. 196488 

DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP

150 South Los Robles Avenue, Suite 400 

Pasadena, California 91101 

Telephone: (626) 449-3750 

Facsimile: (626) 449-5705 

E-mail: LFinateri@dykema.com

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant MEYER 

CORPORATION, U.S. and Cross-Claimant MEYER 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES LIMITED 

[Additional Counsel Listed on Last Page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

CALPHALON CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MEYER CORPORATION, U.S., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:05-CV-00971-WBS-DAD 

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SETTING HEARING ON 

CERTAIN MOTIONS IN LIMINE

MEYER CORPORATION, U.S. and MEYER 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES LIMITED, 

Counterclaimants, 

v. 

CALPHALON CORPORATION, 

Counterdefendant. 

Hearing

Date: May 7, 2007 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Ctrm.: 5, Hon. William B. Shubb 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00971-WBS -DAD Document 198 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 6
-1- 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MIL HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

WHEREAS on August 29 and 30, 2006 the parties filed their respective motions in 

limine with this Court [Docket Nos. 125, 128, 134, 136, 138, 140, 142, 144, 148, 152] , which 

have been fully briefed; 

WHEREAS on March 26, 2007, this Court set a new trial date for June 5, 2007 and 

ordered the parties to review their respective motions in limine and determine which of those 

motions should be set for hearing on May 7, 2007 [Docket No. 195]; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their respective counsel, this 

Honorable Court consenting, that the following motions in limine will be set for hearing on May 7, 

2007 at 1:30 p.m.: 

Plaintiff Calphalon's Motions In Limine:

• Motion In Limine # 1 To Preclude Meyer Corporation, U.S. From 

Presenting Evidence Of And From Referring To Late Produced Financial 

Documents, Late Produced Report Of Meyer's Designated Damages Expert, 

Arthur Cobb, And Testimony Thereon [Docket No. 144] 

• Motion In Limine # 2 To Limit Meyer Corporation, U.S.'S Use Of Expert 

Testimony [Docket No. 148] 

Defendant Meyer's Motions In Limine:

• None. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00971-WBS -DAD Document 198 Filed 04/10/07 Page 2 of 6
-2- 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MIL HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Good cause exists for having the above-listed motions in limine heard on May 7, 

2007 as the resolution of these issues will impact the parties' trial preparation. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by the parties, through their respective counsel, 

this Honorable Court consenting, that the following motions in limine are hereby withdrawn 

without prejudice to being renewed before trial based on the papers currently on file and without 

additional briefing: 

Plaintiff Calphalon's Motions In Limine:

• Motion In Limine # 3 To Preclude Meyer Corporation, U.S. From 

Presenting Evidence Of And From Referring To Matters Not Relevant To 

Design Patent Infringement [Docket No. 142]; 

• Motion In Limine # 4 To Preclude Meyer Corporation, U.S. From 

Presenting Evidence Of And From Referring To Matters Related To Its Cal. 

Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 Counterclaim [Docket No. 134]; 

• Motion In Limine # 5 To Preclude Meyer Corporation, U.S. From 

Presenting Evidence Of And From Referring To Matters Related To 

Alleged Invalidity Of Calphalon's Design Patent [Docket No. 136]; 

• Motion In Limine # 6 To Preclude Meyer Corporation, U.S. From 

Presenting Evidence Of And From Referring To An Alleged Conflict Of 

Interest Of Julie Davis, Calphalon's Damages Expert [Docket No. 140]; 

And 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00971-WBS -DAD Document 198 Filed 04/10/07 Page 3 of 6
-3- 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MIL HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

• Motion In Limine # 7 To Preclude Meyer Corporation, U.S. From 

Presenting Evidence Of And From Referring To An Investigation Of Meyer 

By The International Trade Commission [Docket No. 138].

Defendant Meyer's Motions In Limine:

• Motion In Limine To Preclude Calphalon From Presenting Damages Claims 

Under Both Sections 284 and 289 Of The Patent Act [Docket No. 125]; 

• Motion In Limine To Bar Calphalon’s Request For Prejudgment Interest 

Under 35 U.S.C. § 289 And Julie Davis’ Testimony Regarding Same 

[Docket No. 152]; and 

• Motion In Limine To Bar Reasonable Royalty Testimony Of Julie Davis 

[Docket No. 128]. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

By /s/ Janene P. Bassett 

Dated: April 9, 2007 

JANENE P. BASSETT 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

CALPHALON CORPORATION 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00971-WBS -DAD Document 198 Filed 04/10/07 Page 4 of 6
-4- 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MIL HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC 

By /s/ Dean A. Dickie 

Dated: April 9, 2007 

DEAN A. DICKIE 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

MEYER CORPORATION, U.S. and 

Cross-Claimant MEYER INTELLECTUAL 

PROPERTIES LIMITED 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00971-WBS -DAD Document 198 Filed 04/10/07 Page 5 of 6
-5- 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MIL HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 9, 2007 

Additional Counsel:

GREGORY A. LONG, Cal. Bar No. 57642 

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

333 South Hope Street, 48th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071-1448 

Telephone: 213-620-1780 

Facsimile: 213-620-1398 

E-mail: glong@sheppardmullin.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

CALPHALON CORPORATION 

DEAN A. DICKIE (pro hac vice) 

NAHRIN S. MARINO 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC 

10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2300 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

Telephone: (312) 876-1700 

Facsimile: (312) 876-1155 

E-mail: ddickie@dykema.com

E-mail: nmarino@dykema.com

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

MEYER CORPORATION, U.S. and 

Cross-Claimant MEYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES LIMITED 

CHICAGO\2305274.1 

ID\AJST 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00971-WBS -DAD Document 198 Filed 04/10/07 Page 6 of 6