Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00832/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00832-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ULYSSES DAVIS, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-0832 FCD KJN P

vs.

CHAPLAIN JUMAH, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 16, 2010, plaintiff’s claims against defendants Walker and

Beoke were dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff was granted the option to file an amended

complaint or, if he failed to file an amended complaint, his election to proceed forthwith would

be construed as consent to an order dismissing his defective claims against defendants Walker

and Beoke without prejudice. On March 15, 2010, plaintiff filed the notice of submission of

documents and provided service documents, thereby opting to proceed forthwith and consenting

to the dismissal of defendants Walker and Beoke without prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants Walker and

Beoke be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. 

Case 2:09-cv-00832-FCD-KJN Document 20 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 21, 2010

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

davi0832.56

Case 2:09-cv-00832-FCD-KJN Document 20 Filed 05/24/10 Page 2 of 2