Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00624/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00624-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00624-SI 

Bruce J. Zabarauskas, SBN. 248601

THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP 

707 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 4100 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (310) 203-6902 

Facsimile: (310) 203-6980 

Email: bruce.zabarauskas@tklaw.com 

Justin S. Cohen (pro hac vice) 

Richard L. Wynne, Jr. (pro hac vice) 

THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP 

1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone: (214)969-1700 

Facsimile: (214)969-1751 

Email: justin.cohen@tklaw.com 

Email: richard.wynne@tklaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Richard L. Seabolt (SBN 67469)

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

One Market Plaza, Suite 2200 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: 415.957.3212 

Facsimile: 415.354.3317 

L. Norwood Jameson (admitted pro hac vice) 

Matthew S. Yungwirth (admitted pro hac vice) 

S. Neil Anderson (admitted pro hac vice) 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street, Suite 2000 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309 

Telephone: 404.253.6900 

Facsimile: 404.253.6901 

Arvind Jairam (admitted pro hac vice) 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

505 9th Street, N.W., Suite 1000 

Washington, DC 20004 

Telephone: 202.776.5252 

Facsimile: 202.403.3665 

E-Mail: rlseabolt@duanemorris.com 

E-Mail: wjameson@duanemorris.com 

E-Mail: msyungwirth@duanemorris.com 

E-Mail: ajairam@duanemorris.com 

E-Mail: snanderson@duanemorris.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NETGEAR, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC., et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

NETGEAR, INC., 

 Defendant. 

 

Case No. 3:16-cv-00624-SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

 In accordance with Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. and 

Case 3:16-cv-00624-SI Document 60 Filed 03/24/16 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00624-SI 

Chrimar Holding Company (collectively, “Chrimar”) and Defendant NETGEAR, Inc. 

(“NETGEAR”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

On July 1, 2015, Chrimar filed suit against various defendants in the Eastern District of 

Texas alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,155,012, 8,942,107, 8,902,760, and 9,019,838 

(collectively, the “Patents-in-Suit”). 

Four of the cases have been transferred to the Northern District of California, and are 

presently before this Court: Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., Case No. 3:16-

cv-00558-SI (N.D. Cal.); Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. Ruckus Wireless, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv186-SI (N.D. Cal.); Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. NETGEAR, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-624-SI 

(N.D. Cal.); Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. Fortinet, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-00897-SI (N.D. Cal.) 

(collectively, the “N.D. Cal. Chrimar Cases”). 

The Court has set the four N.D. Cal. Chrimar cases for case management conferences 

(“CMCs”) on four separate dates: April 15, 2016 (Case No. -897); April 22, 2016 (Case No. 186); 

May 6, 2016 (Case No. -558); and May 20, 2016 (Case No. -624). 

Counsel for the parties in all of the N.D. Cal. Chrimar Cases have conferred and believe 

that there would be benefits to the Court and the parties to schedule the CMCs for all of the cases 

scheduled on the same date, and at the Court’s convenience, at the same time if possible. 

Counsel for the parties in all of the N.D. Cal. Chrimar Cases are available for CMC on 

April 22, 2016, which is the date the Court had set the CMC for the Chrimar v. Ruckus case (No. 

3:16-cv-186). Accordingly, if the Court’s schedule permits, counsel for the parties in this action 

have agreed to reschedule the CMC currently set for May 20, 2016, to April 22, 2016, at or near 

2:30 p.m., when the Ruckus CMC is currently scheduled. 

No prior changes to the schedule have been made since this action was transferred to this 

Court. 

Because the Court has not entered a Scheduling Order in any of the four N.D. Cal. 

Chrimar Cases, the requested time modification will have no effect on the schedule for this or any 

of the cases. 

Case 3:16-cv-00624-SI Document 60 Filed 03/24/16 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00624-SI 

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED, that the CMC in this case shall be 

rescheduled to April 22, 2016, at 2:30 p.m. and the related deadline for filing a joint CMC 

statement is adjusted to April 15, 2016. 

Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr. 

Richard L. Wynne, Jr. 

Thompson & Knight LLP 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth w/perm. R. Wynne 

Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Duane Morris LLP 

Counsel for Defendant NETGEAR, Inc. 

Case 3:16-cv-00624-SI Document 60 Filed 03/24/16 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00624-SI 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Case No. 3:16-cv-00624-SI 

STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF DALLAS

 I am employed in the County of Dallas, State of Texas. I am over the age of 18 and not a 

party to the within action. My business address is 1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas 

75201. On April 21, 2015, I served documents described as follows: 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Reschedule Case Management Conference 

 I served the document listed above on the interested parties below, using the following 

means: 

 [X] (By Court’s CM/ECF System) Pursuant to Local Rule, I electronically filed 

the documents with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which 

sent notification of that filing to the persons listed on the CM/ECF service list. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury under 28 U.S.C. § 1746 that the foregoing is true and 

correct. 

Executed on March 18, 2016, at Dallas, Texas. 

/s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr. 

Richard L. Wynne, Jr. 

Case 3:16-cv-00624-SI Document 60 Filed 03/24/16 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-5-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00624-SI 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________, 2016 

THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

March 23

Case 3:16-cv-00624-SI Document 60 Filed 03/24/16 Page 5 of 5