Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-03752/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-03752-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

Case No. 4:18-CV-03752-HSG

1288258 

KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP

BENEDICT Y. HUR - # 224018 

bhur@keker.com 

TRAVIS SILVA - # 295856 

tsilva@keker.com 

633 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 

Telephone: 415 391 5400 

Facsimile: 415 397 7188 

Attorneys for Defendant 

POPSUGAR INC. 

GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP

JONATHAN M. ROTTER - #234137 

jrotter@glancylaw.com 

1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: 310 201 9150 

Facsimile: 310 201 9160 

COHEN IP LAW GROUP, PC 

MICHAEL N. COHEN - #225348 

mcohen@cohenip.com 

9025 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 301 

Beverly Hills, CA 90211 

Telephone: 310 288 4500 

Facsimile: 310 246 9980 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NITA BATRA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

NITA BATRA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

POPSUGAR INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 4:18-CV-03752-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND THE PARTIES’ DEADLINES 

WITH RESPECT TO THE BRIEFING OF 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 

Date: November 8, 2018 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

Courtroom: 2, 4th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr 

Date Filed: June 25, 2018 

Trial Date: Not Yet Set 

Case 4:18-cv-03752-HSG Document 26 Filed 08/24/18 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

Case No. 4:18-CV-03752-HSG

1288258 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties stipulate and agree that Plaintiff Nita Batra’s 

time to oppose Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is 

extended by 14 days up to and including September 14, 2018. The parties further stipulate and 

agree that Defendant POPSUGAR Inc.’s time to file a reply in support of its motion to dismiss is 

extended by 7 days to September 28, 2018. This stipulation does not alter any other date or any 

event or deadline already fixed by Court order or rule. The reasons for the request are set forth in 

the attached Declaration of Stan Karas. 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that all signatories 

have concurred in its filing. 

Dated: August 23, 2018 

By:

GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP

/s/ Jonathan M. Rotter Jonathan M. Rotter

Lesley F. Portnoy 

Stan Karas 

 COHEN IP LAW GROUP, PC

Michael N. Cohen 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Nita Batra

Dated: August 23, 2018 

By:

KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP

/s/ Benedict Y. Hur BENEDICT Y. HUR

TRAVIS SILVA 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

POPSUGAR INC. 

 

Case 4:18-cv-03752-HSG Document 26 Filed 08/24/18 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

Case No. 4:18-CV-03752-HSG

1288258 

DECLARATION OF STAN KARAS 

I, Stan Karas, declare as follows: 

1. I am a member in good standing of the California State Bar and of counsel at the 

law firm of Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, counsel for Plaintiff in this action. I make this 

declaration based on my personal knowledge, and if called to testify to the contents thereof, I 

could and would competently do so. 

2. On August 17, 2018, Defendant PopSugar Inc. filed a motion to dismiss the 

Complaint in this action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). The motion is set for hearing on November 8, 

2018. 

3. Pursuant to N.D. Cal. L. R. 7-3(a), (c), Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion is 

currently due on August 31, 2018, and Defendant’s reply is due on September 7, 2018. 

4. The parties agree that due to counsel’s schedule and the complexity of issues 

presented by the motion a modification of the briefing schedule is appropriate. Specifically, the 

parties agree that Plaintiff’s time to oppose Defendant’s motion to dismiss should be extended by 

14 days up to and including September 14, 2018. The parties further agree that Defendant 

PopSugar Inc.’s time to file a reply in support of its motion should be extended by 7 days to 

September 28, 2018. 

5. The only prior time modification in the case was a stipulation to allow Defendant 

an additional 30 days to respond to the Complaint. The requested time modification would not 

have any impact on the schedule for the case. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing facts are true and correct and this declaration was executed this 23rd day of August, 

2018 in Los Angeles, California. 

s/ Stan Karas 

 Stan Karas

Case 4:18-cv-03752-HSG Document 26 Filed 08/24/18 Page 3 of 4
12882

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

258 

C

D

to

o

D

STIPULAT

TO A

The C

CAUSE APP

Defendant’s m

o and includi

f its motion 

SO OR

Dated: Augu

TION TO EXTE

LL PARTIE

Court has con

PEARING gr

motion to di

ing Septemb

to dismiss is

RDERED. 

ust 24, 2018 

 

END THE BR

PUR

C

ES AND TH

nsidered the 

rants the reli

smiss the Co

ber 14, 2018

s extended b

3

RIEFING SCHE

RSUANT TO L

Case No. 4:18-C

ORD

EIR COUNS

parties’ stip

ief sought th

omplaint pur

. Defendant

by 7 days to S

3

EDULE ON D

LOCAL RULE

CV-03752-HS

DER

SEL OF RE

pulation date

herein. Plain

rsuant to Ru

t PopSugar I

September 2

 Hon.

 Unite

DEFENDANT’

E 6-1 

G

ECORD, 

d August 23

ntiff Nita Bat

ule 12(b)(6) i

Inc.’s time to

28, 2018. 

 

. Haywood S

ed States Di

S MOTION TO

3, 2018 and G

tra’s time to

is extended b

o file a reply

 

S. Gilliam, Jr

istrict Judge

O DISMISS 

GOOD 

o oppose 

by 14 days u

y in support 

r

up 

Case 4:18-cv-03752-HSG Document 26 Filed 08/24/18 Page 4 of 4