Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01724/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01724-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TUTUILA TUVALU, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1724 JAM KJM P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On June 18, 2007, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed June 6, 2007, denying plaintiff’s motions to compel discovery, motions for

discovery, request for the issuance of subpoenas and motion to amend the complaint. Pursuant to

E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous

or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

/////

////

/////

/////

///// 

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 173 Filed 07/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed June 6, 2007, is affirmed. 

DATED: July 15, 2008

/s/ John A. Mendez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/tuva1724.850

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 173 Filed 07/15/08 Page 2 of 2