Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02211/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02211-39/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY RICHARD LOW,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2211 MCE DAD P

vs.

GARY R. STANTON, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Recent findings and recommendations issued by the court were served on

plaintiff's address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed

to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona

inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and

110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:05-cv-02211-MCE -DAD Document 214 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 22, 2010.

DAD:4

low2211.fca

Case 2:05-cv-02211-MCE -DAD Document 214 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 2