Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02008/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02008-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD A. MOTEN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-2008 FCD PAN P

vs.

TOM CAREY, Warden,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed February 17, 2006, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within

twenty days, why respondent’s December 21, 2005 motion to dismiss should not be granted. 

Petitioner was warned that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(m). The twenty day period has now expired, and

petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Case 2:05-cv-02008-FCD-EFB Document 10 Filed 07/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 25, 2006.

/001;mote2008.fsc

Case 2:05-cv-02008-FCD-EFB Document 10 Filed 07/26/06 Page 2 of 2