Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-05750/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-05750-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ABANTE ROOTER AND PLUMBING INC.,

individually and on behalf of all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

LEAD EXCEL, INC., RON TAYLOR, and

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of

them.

Defendants. /

No. C 18-05750 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On February 11, an order issued to the parties granting an extension to file the answer

and partially staying the case pending the individual defendant’s Chapter 13 bankruptcy (Dkt.

No. 24). The order specifically requested a status report from both parties by February 28 that

indicated whether or not the corporate defendant in this action is directly implicated by the

individual defendant’s Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding or whether or not the corporate

defendant is undergoing its own bankruptcy proceeding. Since then, the only filing has been

from the individual defendant advising that he has filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy (Dkt. No.

25). No one has complied with the prior order’s request. 

To that end, by MARCH 12, 2019, both plaintiff and the corporate defendant must file a

status report as to whether the corporate defendant in this action is directly implicated by the

individual defendant’s Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding or whether or not the corporate 

Case 3:18-cv-05750-WHA Document 27 Filed 03/05/19 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

defendant is undergoing its own bankruptcy proceeding and SHOW CAUSE why the prior order

had not been complied with by the original date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 5, 2019. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:18-cv-05750-WHA Document 27 Filed 03/05/19 Page 2 of 2