Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453-59/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

David M. Given (State Bar No. 142375) 

Nicholas A. Carlin (State Bar No. 112532) 

Conor H. Kennedy (State Bar No. 281793) 

PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP 

39 Mesa Street, Suite 201 

San Francisco, CA 94129 

Tel: 415-398-0900 

Fax: 415-398-0911 

Email: dmg@phillaw.com 

nac@phillaw.com 

chk@phillaw.com 

James M. Wagstaffe (State Bar No. 95535) 

Michael J. von Loewenfeldt (State Bar No. 178665) 

Frank Busch (State Bar No. 258228) 

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 

100 Spear Street, 18th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Tel: 415-371-8500 

Fax: 415-371-0500 

Email: wagstaffe@kerrwagstaffe.com 

mvl@kerrwagstaffe.com 

busch@kerrwagstaffe.com 

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MARK OPPERMAN, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

PATH, INC., et al., 

 

Defendants. 

 Case No: 13-cv-00453-JST 

CLASS ACTION 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND 

TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO 

CASES: 

Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST 

Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST 

Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST 

 

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 757 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 6
 

1 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 6-2, Plaintiffs and Defendant Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) 

(collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and seek leave from the Court to continue Plaintiffs’ 

deadline to file and serve their Opposition to Twitter’s Motion for Summary Judgment as well 

as Twitter’s Reply deadline and this Court’s hearing on the Motion. 

The Parties hereby stipulate to continue the briefing schedule for Twitter’s Motion (ECF 

No. 725) as follows: 

EVENT DEADLINE 

Plaintiff’s Opposition Brief 

Twitter’s Reply Brief 

Hearing on Motion 

August 11, 2016 

September 8, 2016 

September 22, 2016 

The reason for the Parties’ request is that they are engaged in discovery-related 

conversations that Plaintiffs contend are relevant to Twitter’s pending Motion for Summary 

Judgment. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: July 5, 2016 /s/ Conor H. Kennedy 

David M. Given 

Nicholas A Carlin 

Conor H. Kennedy 

PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP 

39 Mesa Street, Suite 201 

San Francisco, CA 94129 

Tel: (415) 398-0900 

Fax: (415) 398-0911 

Michael von Loewenfeldt 

James M. Wagstaffe 

Frank Busch 

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 

101 Mission Street, 18th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Tel: (415) 371-8500 

Fax: (415) 371-0500 

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

(Additional counsel listed on following page.)

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 757 Filed 07/07/16 Page 2 of 6
 

2 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Carl F. Schwenker (admitted pro hac vice) 

LAW OFFICES OF CARL F. SCHWENKER 

1101 East 11th Street 

Austin, TX 78702 

Tel: (512) 480-8427 

Fax: (512) 857-1294 

Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel

Jeff Edwards (admitted pro hac vice) 

EDWARDS LAW 

1101 East 11th Street 

Austin, TX 78702 

Tel: (512) 623-7727 

Fax: (512) 623-7729 

Jennifer Sarnelli (SBN 242510) 

GARDY & NOTIS, LLP 

Tower 56 

126 E. 56th Street, 8th Floor 

New York, NY 10022 

Tel: (212) 905-0509 

Fax: (212) 905-0508 

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee 

Dated: July 5, 2016 /s/ James G. Snell 

James G. Snell 

Julie E. Schwartz 

Lauren B. Cohen 

PERKINS COIE LLP 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Tel: (650) 838-4300 

Fax: (650) 838-4350 

Ryan T. Mrazik 

John R. Tyler 

PERKINS COIE LLP 

1201 Third Ave, Suite 4900 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Tel: (206) 359-8000 

Fax: (206) 359-9000 

Counsel for Defendant Twitter, Inc. 

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 757 Filed 07/07/16 Page 3 of 6
 

3 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION 

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other 

signatories listed above. 

Dated: July 5, 2016 /s/ Conor H. Kennedy 

Conor H. Kennedy 

 

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 757 Filed 07/07/16 Page 4 of 6
 

4 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The stipulation between Plaintiffs and Defendants Twitter, Inc. regarding timing of 

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant Twitter, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is 

GRANTED, to be scheduled as follows: 

EVENT DEADLINE 

Plaintiff’s Opposition Brief 

Twitter’s Reply Brief 

Hearing on Motion 

August 11, 2016 

September 8, 2016 

September 22, 2016 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: __________________, 2016 

 By: __________________________ 

 Hon. JON S. TIGAR 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 757 Filed 07/07/16 Page 5 of 6
 

5 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on this day, July 5, 2016, I caused a copy of the foregoing document, 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS 

TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, to 

be served on all counsel of record via the CM/ECF system. 

Dated: July 5, 2016 /s/ Conor H. Kennedy 

Conor H. Kennedy 

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 757 Filed 07/07/16 Page 6 of 6