Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-01141/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-01141-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE 

FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 

Arlene C. Helfrich, State Bar No. 096461 

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

The Waterfront Building - 2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

John A. Russo, City Attorney – State Bar No. 129729 

Randolph W. Hall, Assistant City Attorney – State Bar No. 080142 

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 

CITY OF OAKLAND 

One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 238-3701 

Facsimile: (510) 238-6500 

Kenneth Simoncini Esq. 

SIMMONCINI & ASSOCIATES 

Attorneys for CITY OF OAKLAND, et al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OLEWASAMI BROWN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY OF OAKLAND, OFFICERS JOHN L. 

GUTIERREZ, et al., 

 Defendants. 

_______________________________________

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 FILE: No. C-03-1141 TEH 

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER 

CONTINUING EXPERT DISCLOSURES 

AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND 

HEARING DATE FOR DISPOSITIVE 

MOTION 

Honorable Thelton E. Henderson 

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

The parties, acting by and through their respective legal counsel, stipulate to the following 

with regards to scheduling of any party’s dispositive Motion For Summary Judgment and 

Case 3:03-cv-01141-TEH Document 75 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 3
2 

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE 

FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

respectfully request that the Court amend its pre-trial order regarding the filing date of dispositive 

motions and hearing date: 

Good Cause exists for this Stipulation and Request for Order based on the Court’s February 

28, 2006 Order designating for disclosure certain OPD Internal Affairs Documents to be redacted by 

the Court and released to the parties subject to a stipulated protective order. The terms of the 

protective order have been agreed upon by the parties and submitted to the Court on March 9, 2006. 

The parties assume that the Court will produce the subject documents the week of March 13, 2006. 

 The Court’s Pre-Trial Order required Plaintiff to disclose experts on March 23, 2006, and 

Defendants to disclose 15 days later; and, required dispositive motions to be filed by March 13, 2006 

with a hearing date of April 17, 2006. Given the Court’s Order Re: disclosure of certain IAD 

documents and in order to provide adequate time for the parties to incorporate this discovery into 

their dispositive motion papers, it is hereby stipulated as follows: 

1. The parties have until March 23, 2006 to file their Motions for Summary Judgment, 

moved from the current due date of March 13, 2006. Opposition papers to be filed on or before April 

10, 2006. Reply briefs to be filed on or before April 17, 2006. 

 2. The parties stipulate that these motions be heard May 1, 2006, moved from the current 

hearing date of April 17, 2006. 

 3. Plaintiff shall disclose expert witnesses April 3, 2006, and Defendants shall disclose 

experts April 18, 2006.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 /s/ 

Dated: March ____ , 2006 ________________________________ 

 RUSSELL A. ROBINSON 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Olewasami Brown 

 

 /s/ 

Dated: March ____ , 2006 __________________________________ 

 GREGORY M. FOX 

 Attorney for Defendants City of Oakland et al. 

Case 3:03-cv-01141-TEH Document 75 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 3
3 

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE 

FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated:________________ ______________________________________ 

 THELTON E. HENDERSON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

ATTTORNEY ATTESTATION 

 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled document. 

 /s/ 

 _______________________________ 

 GREGORY M. FOX 

03/15/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:03-cv-01141-TEH Document 75 Filed 03/15/06 Page 3 of 3