Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03285/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03285-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT N. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-3285 EFB 

vs.

CARMASSI FAMILY LIMITED ORDER

PARTNERSHIP,

Defendant. 

 /

On May 26, 2010, this action was reassigned to the undersigned based on the consent of

the parties, and all hearing dates then set before the district judge were vacated. See E.D. Cal.

L.R. 305; 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Because this case has not yet been scheduled pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), a status (pretrial scheduling) conference will be set before the

undersigned. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for July 14, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. in

Courtroom No. 24 before the undersigned.

////

////

////

Case 2:09-cv-03285-EFB Document 16 Filed 06/02/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 1

 The parties are encouraged, when possible, to file a joint status report.

2

2. Not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference, the parties shall file

status reports1

 briefly describing the case and addressing the following:

a. Progress in service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Expected or desired amendment of pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and their scheduling;

f. The report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 outlining the

proposed discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Cut-off dates for discovery and law and motion, and dates for pretrial

conference and trial;

h. Special procedures, if any;

I. Estimated trial time;

j. Modifications of standard pretrial procedures due to the simplicity or

complexity of the proceedings;

k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including bankruptcy;

l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled;

m. Whether counsel will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this matter

acting as settlement judge and waiving disqualification by virtue of his so acting, or whether they

prefer to have a settlement conference conducted before another judge;

n. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this

matter.

3. Failing to obey federal or local rules, or order of this court, may result in dismissal of

this action. Even though the court will construe pro se pleadings liberally, pro se litigants must

Case 2:09-cv-03285-EFB Document 16 Filed 06/02/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

comply with the procedural rules.

4. Plaintiff and counsel are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers

immediately of any settlement or other disposition. See L.R. 160. In addition, the parties are

cautioned that pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), opposition to granting of a motion must be filed

fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Local Rule further provides that

“[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written

opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” Moreover, Local Rule 230(I)

provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may

result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules

“may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within

the inherent power of the Court.”

DATED: June 2, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-03285-EFB Document 16 Filed 06/02/10 Page 3 of 3