Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05589/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05589-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS, SBN SC 9990

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, 

Social Security Administration

GERALYN A.GULSETH, SBN 160872

Special Assistant United States Attorney

333 Market Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8923

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DALE CLARK, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of )

Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

CIVIL NO. C-06-05589-SI

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF REMAND

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the

approval of the Court, that this action be remanded to the Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security,

pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. 

On remand, the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review will remand this case to an 

Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and direct him to obtain evidence from a vocational expert regarding a

comparison between Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity and the mental and physical demands of

Plaintiff’s past relevant work, in accordance with 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(e) and Social Security Rulings

82-61 and 82-62. If the ALJ decides to consider “step five” of the sequential evaluation, he will obtain

evidence from a vocational expert to clarify the effect of Plaintiff’s assessed limitations on Plaintiff’s

occupational base. 

Case 3:06-cv-05589-SI Document 16 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-05589-SI Document 17 Filed 03/06/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Office of Disability Adjudication and Review and/or the ALJ will take any further action

deemed appropriate to develop the record and issue a new decision. 

Dated: March 1, 2007 /s/ harvey sackett 

 (As authorized via facsimile on 3/1/07)

HARVEY SACKETT

Attorney for Plaintiff

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney

Dated: March 1, 2007 By: /s/ geralyn a. gulseth 

GERALYN A. GULSETH

Special Assistant United States Attorney

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that this action is reversed and remanded to the

Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further

proceedings.

Dated: __________________ _____________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05589-SI Document 16 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-05589-SI Document 17 Filed 03/06/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DALE CLARK, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of )

Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CIVIL NO. C-06-5589-SI

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the agency’s final decision is reversed and remanded pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Commissioner of Social Security shall assume jurisdiction to

conduct further administrative proceedings as set forth in the parties’ Stipulation of Remand, filed

herein. This constitutes a final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. 

Dated: __________________ _____________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05589-SI Document 16 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-05589-SI Document 17 Filed 03/06/07 Page 3 of 3