Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01291/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01291-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH W. MILLS, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1291 GEB KJM P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28

U.S.C. § 1915. However, the request is not on this district’s current form, which includes a

certification that must be completed by plaintiff’s institution of incarceration. Also, plaintiff has

not filed a certified copy of his prisoner trust account statement for the six month period

immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff will be

provided the opportunity to submit a completed in forma pauperis application and a certified

copy of his prisoner trust account statement in support of his application.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01291-GEB -KJM Document 11 Filed 07/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a 

completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided

by the Clerk of Court; 

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to

Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and

3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a certified

copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the

filing of the complaint. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: June 30, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

mill1291.3c

Case 2:05-cv-01291-GEB -KJM Document 11 Filed 07/01/05 Page 2 of 2