Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00028/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00028-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No. 1:16-cv-00028-DAD-BAM 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Joseph E. Addiego III (CA SBN 169522) 

Mary McNeill (CA SBN 261500) 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 276-6500 

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 

Email: marymcneill@dwt.com 

 joeaddiego@dwt.com 

 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION 

CATHLEEN C. EMLER and ROBERT W. 

EMLER, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 1:16-cv-00028-DAD-BAM

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR

DEFENDANT JP MORGAN CHASE 

BANK, N.A TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT; ORDER 

[Civ. L.R. 6-1] 

Complaint Filed December 9, 2015 

Complaint Served December 11, 2015

 

Case 1:16-cv-00028-DAD-BAM Document 7 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 3
2 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No. 1:16-cv-00028-DAD-BAM 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, on January 8, 2016, Defendant JP Morgan Chase N.A. (“Chase”) removed this 

matter from state court; 

WHEREAS, Chase’s original deadline to respond to the complaint is January 15, 2016; and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff granted Chase a 30-day extension to respond to the complaint. 

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant Chase HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE 

AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The deadline for Chase to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ 

complaint shall be extended up to and including February 15, 2016. 

2. This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by 

Court order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED January 25, 2016. 

 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

Joseph E. Addiego, III 

Sanjay M. Nangia 

 

By: /s/ Joseph E. Addiego III 

 Joseph E. Addiego III 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 

KETTNER LAW CORPORATION 

Marc S. Applbaum 

 By:/s/ Marc S. Applbaum 

Marc S. Applbaum 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

CATHLEEN C. EMLER and ROBERT W. 

 EMLER 

 

Case 1:16-cv-00028-DAD-BAM Document 7 Filed 01/26/16 Page 2 of 3
3 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No. 1:16-cv-00028-DAD-BAM 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ATTESTATION 

I, Joseph E. Addiego, III, hereby attest that concurrences in the filing of this document have 

been obtained from each of the signatories. 

 /s/ Joseph E. Addiego III Joseph E. Addiego III 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 25, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:16-cv-00028-DAD-BAM Document 7 Filed 01/26/16 Page 3 of 3