Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00574/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00574-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Luis Alonso Martinez, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al.,

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-0574-PHX-EHC (JRI)

 

ORDER

On March 19, 2007, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (Dkt. 1). On January 27, 2004, Petitioner was convicted by a jury in state

court of robbery, burglary and theft offenses. On March 11, 2004, the trial court sentenced

Petitioner to a total of 27 years of imprisonment. 

The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin who filed a Report and

Recommendation on September 19, 2008 recommending that the Petition be dismissed with

prejudice as untimely (Dkt. 23). Petitioner has not filed an Objection or otherwise responded

to the Report and Recommendation. 

 Standard of Review

The district court reviews de novo the portions of the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation to which there is a filed objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)("a judge of

the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report, ..., to which

Case 2:07-cv-00574-EHC Document 25 Filed 11/19/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

objection is made."); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.

2003). The district court is not required to review any issue that is not the subject of an

objection. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Ariz. 2003), citing Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

Discussion

In the absence of a filed objection by Petitioner, the Court adopts in full the Report

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates the same as a part of this

Order. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt.

23) is adopted in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (Dkt. 1) is dismissed with prejudice.

DATED this 18th day of November, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-00574-EHC Document 25 Filed 11/19/08 Page 2 of 2