Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02658/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02658-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL—No. C-08-02658 RMW

CCL

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 7/22/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MANDANA D. FARHANG and M.A.

MOBILE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,

KHARAGPUR; TECHNOLOGY

ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND TRAINING

SOCIETY; PARTHA P. CHAKRABARTI;

PALLAB DASGUPTA; GURASHISH S.

BRAR; RAKESH GUPTA; PRAVANJAN

CHOUDHURY; SUBRAT PANDA;

ANIMESH NASKAR,

Defendants.

No. C-08-02658 RMW

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL

[Re Docket No. 146]

Plaintiffs move to file under seal Exhibits S1 to S6 to the Third Amended Complaint. A

request to seal must establish that the document, or portions thereof, is privileged or protectable as a

trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. Civ. L. R. 79-5(a). The request must

be narrowly tailored to seek sealing of only sealable material. Id. 

Having reviewed the material that plaintiffs seek to file under seal, the court does not see a

basis for sealing Exhibit S6 and thus denies the motion to seal with respect to this exhibit. The

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 178 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL—No. C-08-02658 RMW

CCL 2

motion to file Exhibits S1 to S5 under seal is granted. Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e), plaintiffs

have 4 days to resubmit the documents in a manner that conforms to this order. 

DATED: 7/22/10

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 178 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 2