Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-03828/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-03828-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN SENDER,

Plaintiff,

v.

FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC,

Defendant.

Case No. 11-cv-03828-EMC 

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S 

OBJECTIONS TO FEBRUARY 18, 2016 

ORDER

Docket No. 194

On February 18, 2016, Judge Kim issued an order on Plaintiff John Sender’s motion to 

compel the production of documents that Defendant Franklin Resources, Inc. withheld or redacted 

on the basis of attorney-client privilege. Docket No. 188. Plaintiff then filed objections pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

1

 Docket No. 194. Defendant 

must file an opposition to Plaintiff’s objections by March 16, 2016, not to exceed nine pages (not 

including declarations and exhibits). No reply is permitted. Defendant should also lodge the 

documents at issue directly with the court for in camera inspection, and not file the documents 

with the clerk’s office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 8, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

 1 The Court notes that Plaintiff’s objections were filed in violation of Local Rule 72-2, which 

states that any objection must be made as a “Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order 

of Magistrate Judge” and may not exceed five pages.

Case 3:11-cv-03828-EMC Document 198 Filed 03/08/16 Page 1 of 1