Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07491/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07491-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PL.’S MOT. TO COMPEL AND DEF.’S 

MOT. FOR PROT. ORDER

Case No. C sf-2380287-06-7491-CRB

ANGELA L. PADILLA (CA SBN 154863)

APadilla@mofo.com

LINDSAY T. BRAUNIG (CA SBN 244125)

LBraunig@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268-7000

Facsimile: 415.268-7520

JAMES R. STEFFEN (Pro Hac Vice)

JRSteffen@faegre.com

MICHAEL A. PONTO (Pro Hac Vice)

Mponto@faegre.com

Faegre & Benson LLP

2200 Wells Fargo Center

90 South Seventh Street

Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901

Telephone: 612.766.7000

Facsimile: 612.766.1600

Attorneys for Defendant

TARGET CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC., a California 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota 

corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. C-06-7491-CRB

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL AND

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 3:06-cv-07491-CRB Document 55 Filed 12/11/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PL.’S MOT. TO COMPEL AND DEF.’S 

MOT. FOR PROT. ORDER

Case No. C sf-2380287-06-7491-CRB

1

On December 7, 2007, Plaintiff Williams-Sonoma, Inc. will file a Motion to Compel and 

Defendant Target Corporation will file a Motion for Protective Order. Both motions will be 

noticed for a hearing on January 18, 2008. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties, through 

their counsel, make the following stipulations:

1. In order to avoid filing briefs during the period between Christmas and New 

Year’s, during which time some or all of counsel will be out of the office, the 

parties have agreed to a briefing schedule different than that imposed by the Civil 

Local Rules.

2. Under the briefing schedule to which the parties have agreed, the Court will 

receive the parties’ briefs either earlier than required by the Local Rules, or on the 

same day as required by the Local Rules. 

3. The parties have stipulated that they will each file an opposition to the other’s 

motion on Friday, December 21, 2007; and that they will each file a reply to the 

other’s opposition on Friday, January 4, 2008.

Dated: December 7, 2007 ANGELA L. PADILLA

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Angela L. Padilla

Angela L. Padilla

Attorneys for Defendant

TARGET CORPORATION

Dated: December 7, 2007 TALI L. ALBAN

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND 

CREW LLP

/s/ Tali L. Alban

 Tali L. Alban

Attorneys for Plaintiff

WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.

Case 3:06-cv-07491-CRB Document 55 Filed 12/11/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PL.’S MOT. TO COMPEL AND DEF.’S 

MOT. FOR PROT. ORDER

Case No. C sf-2380287-06-7491-CRB

2

GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION

I, Angela L. Padilla, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel and 

Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order. In compliance with General Order 45, concurrence in 

the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories and I shall 

maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered 

or for inspection upon request by a party.

Dated: December 7, 2007.

/s/ Angela L. Padilla

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS 

THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties each file an opposition to the other’s discovery 

motion, which motions are being filed on December 7, 2007, on Friday, December 21, 2007; and 

that each party file a reply to the other’s opposition on Friday, January 4, 2008.

Dated: , 2007 

The Hon. Charles R. Breyer

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-07491-CRB Document 55 Filed 12/11/07 Page 3 of 3