Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01705/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01705-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEROY HAWKINS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:09-cv-01705-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

DEFENDANT BACHER’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS

ECF Nos. 28, 45

Plaintiff Leroy Hawkins (“Plaintiff”), a California state prisoner, filed this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 28, 2009. The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 15, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations, 

recommending that Defendant Bacher’s motion to dismiss be denied. (ECF No. 45.) Defendant 

Bacher has filed objections. (ECF No. 49.)

///

///

///

///

Case 1:09-cv-01705-LJO-MJS Document 53 Filed 02/06/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 15, 2013, are adopted in full; 

2. Defendant Bacher’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 28) is DENIED, without 

prejudice; and

3. Defendant Bacher should file a response to Plaintiff’s Second Amended 

Complaint within thirty days of entry of this order.

4.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 5, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5.

Case 1:09-cv-01705-LJO-MJS Document 53 Filed 02/06/14 Page 2 of 2