Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05977/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05977-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDELINA ROYBAL-DE-AGUERO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WELLS FARGO NA,

Defendant. /

No. CV 12-05977 CRB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO REOPEN CASE

Two years ago, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s case with prejudice pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), see Order (dkt. 21); Judgment (dkt. 22), and granted

Defendant’s unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees, see Order (dkt. 28). Shortly thereafter,

the Court denied Plaintiff’s first Motion to Reopen. See Order (dkt. 36). Plaintiff has now

filed a document entitled “EX PARTE APPLICATION TO RE-OPEN AND CLERKS[’]

REMAND CORRECT PARTIES AS LISTED ON CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Case

Management Conference Ex Parte Motion to Consolidate [Proposed] Order.” 

See Application (dkt. 38).

The Court cannot discern any legal basis for reopening the case or for making the 

//

//

//

Case 3:12-cv-05977-CRB Document 39 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

changes Plaintiff requests. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Application. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2015 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:12-cv-05977-CRB Document 39 Filed 03/19/15 Page 2 of 2