Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02904/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02904-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LATASHA MCLAUGHLIN, on behalf of

herself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,

Defendant. /

No. C 15-02904 WHA

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE

FROM PLAINTIFF RE

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

STAY

Defendant Wells Fargo has filed a motion to stay our case pending the Supreme Court’s

ruling in Spokeo v. Robbins, in which oral argument took place on November 2, 2015. In

Spokeo, the question pending before the Supreme Court is:

Whether Congress may confer Article III standing upon a plaintiff

who suffers no concrete harm, and who therefore could not

otherwise invoke the jurisdiction of a federal court, by authorizing

a private right of action based on a bare violation of a federal

statute. 

Plaintiff is requested to respond to defendant’s motion to stay by NOON ON FEBRUARY 16, 2016.

Dated: February 9, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-02904-WHA Document 74 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 1