Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04401/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04401-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 NETBLUE, INC. ET AL,

Defendants. /

No. C-05-04401 SC (EDL)

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO SEAL

Having considered the Administrative Motion of Plaintiff for an order permitting the filing

under seal certain documents submitted in support of Plaintiff’s Reply to Opposition to Motion to

Strike (Doc. No. 136), it is hereby ordered that Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion is DENIED.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), within five days after a party has lodged with the Court

a document another party has designated confidential, the designating party must file with the Court

and serve a declaration establishing that the designated information is sealable, or must withdraw the

designation of confidentiality. Civ. L.R. 79-5(d). If the designating party fails to file a declaration

in accordance with this rule, the document or proposed filing will be made part of the public record. 

Id.

Here, Plaintiff lodged with the Court documents designated confidential by Defendants as

Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Richard E. Grabowski (Doc. No. 136-1) filed in support of

Plaintiff’s Reply in support of its motion captioned Motion to Strike Designation of Defendants’

Corporate Information Regarding Affiliates and List Managers as “Confidential” or “Highly

Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Under the Protective Order (Doc. No. 110) (“Motion to

Strike”). Defendants failed to file a declaration establishing that the designated information is

sealable. Therefore, Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Richard E. Grabowski (Doc. No. 136-1)

Case 3:05-cv-04401-SC Document 183 Filed 01/23/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 will be made part of the public record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2007 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-04401-SC Document 183 Filed 01/23/07 Page 2 of 2