Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06723/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06723-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS E. ECHEVERRIA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

C/O MS. VONSAVOYE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06723-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 5)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Luis E. Echeverria (“plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On February 16, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On February 25, 2005, plaintiff filed a Notice of Change

of Address. On April 1, 2005, the court re-served plaintiff with

the Findings and Recommendation at his new address. On April 18,

Case 1:04-cv-06723-OWW -LJO Document 11 Filed 07/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2005 plaintiff filed objections, erroneously titled as a

“Return,” to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

In light of Plaintiff’s filing, the Court, on June 3, 2005,

reissued the Order requiring Plaintiff to file his Application to

Proceed In Forma Pauperis or pay the filing fee. On June 16,

2005, the Order was returned to the Court as “undeliverable.” 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed February 16,

2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on plaintiff’s failure

to obey the court’s order of January 7, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 7, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06723-OWW -LJO Document 11 Filed 07/08/05 Page 2 of 2