Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01896/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01896-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

DR. WANG, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:08-cv-01896-LJO-GSA-PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME

(Doc. 82.)

ORDER WITHDRAWING MOTION FROM 

COURT’S CALENDAR

(Doc. 80.)

Jamisi Jermaine Calloway (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this 

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this 

action on December 10, 2008. (Doc. 1.) This action now proceeds on the Third Amended 

Complaint filed on October 5, 2009, on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims, against 

defendant Dr. Wang for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs, and against 

defendants C/O Hayward and C/O Oaks for use of excessive force.1 (Doc. 20.) 

On March 19, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for a ninety-day extension of time to file 

objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations issued on February 15, 

2013. (Doc. 80.) On March 21, 2013, Defendants filed a response to the motion for extension 

of time, opposing a ninety-day extension of time as excessive. (Doc. 81.)

 

1On March 17, 2011, the Court dismissed all other claims and defendants from this action, under Rule 18(a) or for 

Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim. (Doc. 24.)

Case 1:08-cv-01896-LJO-GSA Document 83 Filed 04/18/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On April 17, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw the motion for extension of 

time. (Doc. 82.) Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw shall be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his motion for extension of time is GRANTED; 

and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time, filed on March 19, 2013, is 

WITHDRAWN from the Court’s calendar.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 18, 2013 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

6i0kij8d

Case 1:08-cv-01896-LJO-GSA Document 83 Filed 04/18/13 Page 2 of 2