Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01920/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01920-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRITTA BURKE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1920 GEB GGH

vs.

STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

This court has considered the Parties’ Proposed Stipulated Protective Order.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties’

Stipulated Protective Order is GRANTED with the following modifications. The substantive

standards set forth by the Ninth Circuit for filing documents under seal are found in Pintos v.

Pacific Creditors Ass’n., 565 F.3d 1106, 1115 (9th Cir. 2009) and Phillips v. General Motors

Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2002).

Procedurally, the parties must comply with E. D. Local Rules 141 and 141.1

regarding the sealing of documents.

Any confidential material filed with the court, sealed or otherwise, will not be

returned at the conclusion of the litigation. 

////

Case 2:09-cv-01920-GEB-GGH Document 15 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

This order does not purport to bind other courts in the conduct of their business.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 29, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Burke1920.mod.wpd

Case 2:09-cv-01920-GEB-GGH Document 15 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 2