Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02336/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02336-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT D. REESE, 

Plaintiff, 2:05-cv-2336-GEB-KJM-P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, Warden, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On February 28, 2008, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order filed February 15, 2008, finding service of the amended complaint

appropriate for defendants Kofed, Traquina and Kanan, but not appropriate for defendants Carey,

Tilton, Vahdatyar, Johnson, Mathias, Luttray, Goller, Noriega, Pearson and Grannis. Pursuant to

Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or

contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 /////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-02336-GEB-CKD Document 36 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed February 15, 2008, is affirmed. 

Dated: March 12, 2008

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02336-GEB-CKD Document 36 Filed 03/13/08 Page 2 of 2