Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01050/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01050-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOEL RIVERA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE

UNDER POOLING AND SERVICING

AGREEMENT DATED AS OF NOVEMBER

1, 2004, ASSET-BACKED PASS-THROUGH

CERTIFICATES SERIES 2004 WHQ2,

BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE d/b/a

HOMEQ SERVICING CORPORATION,

OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, ARGENT

MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC, THE HOME

LOAN GROUP, and DOES 1–100, Inclusive.

Defendants. /

No. C 10-01050 WHA

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee under pooling and servicing agreement

dated as of November 1, 2004, asset-backed pass-through certificates series 2004 WHQ2, and

Barclays Capital Real Estate d/b/a Homeq Servicing Corporation, filed a motion to dismiss

plaintiff’s complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to the motion

was due on April 8, 2010, but no such opposition has been received. Plaintiff was ordered to

respond by April 14, 2010, and show cause for his failure to respond to the motion in

accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or alternately to file a statement of nonopposition to

the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). Yet again, the deadline has passed and

plaintiff has not provided a response. 

Case 3:10-cv-01050-WHA Document 15 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

As described, plaintiff has repeatedly failed to respond in a timely fashion. Due to

plaintiff’s failure to prosecute, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. 

Judgment shall be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 19, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-01050-WHA Document 15 Filed 04/19/10 Page 2 of 2