Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00792/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00792-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SV #319892 v1 -1- 

STIPULATION REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES AND DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND 

[] ORDER 

Case No. C-07-00792 RMW

DANIEL J. MULLER, CA BAR NO. 193396 dmuller@thelen.com 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

225 West Santa Clara, 12th Floor 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Tel. 408.292.5800 

Fax: 408.287.8040 

ANN KANE SMITH, CA BAR NO. 72698 aksmith@thelen.com 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

333 South Hope Street, Suite 2900 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Tel. 213.576.8000 

Fax 213.576.8080 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LEXUS OF STEVENS CREEK; and 

PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. 

ROBERT DAVID BAKER, CA BAR NO. 87314 attyatlaw@earthlink.net 

ROBERT DAVID BAKER, INC. 

1611 The Alameda 

San Jose, CA 95126 

Tel. 408.292.8555 

Fax. 408.292.0703 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

DENISE DIETZMAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

LEXUS OF STEVENS CREEK; PENSKE 

AUTOMOTIVE GROUP; DOES 1-20, 

Defendants 

Case No.: C07-00792-RMW 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES 

AND DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND 

[] ORDER 

*E-FILED - 11/29/07*

Case 5:07-cv-00792-RMW Document 23 Filed 11/29/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -2- 

STIPULATION REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES AND DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND 

[] ORDER 

Case No. C-07-00792 RMW

The parties to the above-entitled actions and their counsel of record hereby state as follows: 

1. Per the scheduling order applicable to this case issued by the Court on June 27, 

2007, the parties are currently required to disclose their expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) by December 3, 2007. Pursuant to this Stipulation, the parties 

hereby request an extension of this deadline. 

2. The parties base their request on the fact that they have been actively attempting to 

settle this matter but that their efforts at settlement have been delayed pending the taking and 

completion of the deposition of a third party witness. The witness’ deposition was rescheduled 

with the agreement of counsel to accommodate his and his attorney’s schedule. The Parties are 

hopeful that once the deposition is completed, they can resume settlement discussions and resolve 

this case without the need for incurring expensive and time consuming expert discovery. 

Accordingly, they stipulate and propose that the Court order the following changes to the its 

scheduling order: 

 A. The date for Expert Witness Disclosure shall be changed from December 3, 

2007 to January 14, 2008. 

 D. The date that expert discovery shall close will change from January 7, 2008 

to February 18, 2008. 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ /

Case 5:07-cv-00792-RMW Document 23 Filed 11/29/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SV #319892 v1 -3- 

STIPULATION REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES AND DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND 

[] ORDER 

Case No. C-07-00792 RMW

In the event that this matter does not resolve in an agreed settlement, the parties are 

confident that, even with the above-requested changes to the expert discovery deadlines, they will 

be prepared for trial as scheduled on April 7, 2008. 

Dated: November 26, 2007 THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER 

By: /s/ 

 Daniel J. Muller 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: November 26, 2007 ROBERT DAVID BAKER, INC. 

By: /s/ 

 Robert David Baker 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

In accordance with General Order 45, part X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been obtained from Robert David Baker, the other signatory. 

 /s/ Daniel J. Muller______

ORDER 

Having reviewed the above stipulation, the Court hereby orders that its scheduling 

order be modified as stipulated by the parties. 

Dated: November 30, 2007 

 ___________________________ 

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:07-cv-00792-RMW Document 23 Filed 11/29/07 Page 3 of 3