Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01522/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01522-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUVENAL DEANDA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

JEFF WRIGLEY, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-01522-AWI-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 5)

ORDER GRANTING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER THAT RESPONDENT

CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATENESS

OF TRANSFERRING PETITIONER

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On February 8, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

GRANTED, and Respondent be ORDERED to consider the appropriateness

of transferring Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set

forth in § 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed

appropriate by the BOP, without reference to the BOP policy

promulgated in December 2002 and without reference to the BOP's

February 14, 2005, amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. These Findings

and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice

Case 1:06-cv-01522-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 05/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

that any objections were to be filed within twenty (20) days from

the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not

filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 8, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED; and,

3. Respondent, within three months from the date of this

order, consider the appropriateness of transferring Petitioner to

an RRC in light of the factors set forth in § 3621(b), not

excluding any other factors deemed appropriate by the BOP, without

reference to the BOP policy promulgated in December 2002 and

without reference to the BOP's February 14, 2005, amendment to 28

C.F.R. § 570.21. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 17, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01522-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 05/18/07 Page 2 of 2