Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01403/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01403-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT MEE FONG YU TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs CRAIG YATES 

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CRAIG YATES, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES:HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NEW TIN’S MARKET; MEE FONG YU;

SUNG TING SUNG SUPERMARKET,

INC.; P&L INTERNATIONAL TRADING

CO., INC.

Defendant. ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C07-1403-MJJ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANT MEE FONG YU TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs Craig Yates and Disability Rights Enforcement, Education Services, through

their undersigned counsel, and defendant Mee Fong Yu, through her undersigned counsel,

stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant Mee Fong Yu, is granted an extension of time to and including June

18, 2007, to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ complaint.

2. In the event defendant Mee Fong Yu, files a motion in lieu of an answer to

plaintiffs’ complaint, the hearing on such motion shall be set on a date no sooner than 45 days

from the date of service of said motion.

Case 3:07-cv-01403-MJJ Document 4 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:07-cv-01403-MHP Document 5 Filed 05/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT MEE FONG YU TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 2

3. Defendant’s counsel further stipulates that defendant will comply with any and all

due dates dictated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Court, and/or any

scheduling order issued by the court prior to the date on which defendants’ responsive pleading

is due hereunder.

This Stipulation may be executed in faxed counterparts, all of which together shall

constitute one original document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: May 10, 2007 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ 

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for CRAIG YATES and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

Dated: May 9, 2007 MICHAEL DEVIN, ATTORNEY AT LAW

By: /s/ 

Michael Devin

Attorney for Defendant MEE FONG YU

O R D E R 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2007

______________________________________________

Martin J. Jenkins

United States District Court Judge

Case 3:07-cv-01403-MJJ Document 4 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 2 of 2

May 13

Case 3:07-cv-01403-MHP Document 5 Filed 05/15/07 Page 2 of 2