Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01379/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01379-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

NB1:701667.1

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

PROPOSED ORDER - CASE NO. 2:05-CV-1379 

THOMAS M. RIORDAN (S.B. # 176364) 

REUBEN D. WILSON (S.B.# 212563) 

MOLLY J. MAGNUSON (S.B. # 229444) 

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

400 South Hope Street 

Los Angeles, California 90071-2899 

Telephone: (213) 430-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 

Attorneys for Defendant 

VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CAROLE TREW, on behalf of herself and 

all others similarly situated, and on behalf 

of the General Public as a Private 

Attorney General; LOREN FUNK, on 

behalf of himself and all others similarly 

situated; and JUDITH AND MATTHEW 

WESLEY MARX, on behalf of 

themselves and others similarly situated. 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

VOLVO CARS OF NORTH 

AMERICA, LLC, and DOES 1-100, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:05-CV-1379-DFL-EFB 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; ORDER 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto initially stipulated through their respective counsel 

that the deadline for defendant Volvo Cars of North America, LLC (“Volvo”) to respond 

to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint was extended up to and including May 26, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties subsequently participated in settlement negotiations with 

the assistance of a mediator, and began the process of negotiating and drafting a 

settlement agreement; 

Case 2:05-cv-01379-MCE -EFB Document 76 Filed 12/12/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

NB1:701667.1 2 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

PROPOSED ORDER - CASE NO. 2:05-CV-1379 

WHEREAS, in order to allow sufficient time to continue to negotiate a settlement, 

the parties stipulated to further extend the deadline for Volvo to respond to Plaintiffs’ First 

Amended Complaint to June 30, 2006, which deadline was subsequently extended to 

September 15, 2006, and then to October 31, 2006, all of which were approved by this 

Court; 

WHEREAS, with the consent of Volvo, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended 

Complaint on or about November 13, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties continue to work in cooperation on the preparation of a 

settlement agreement, most of the terms of which have been negotiated, and numerous 

drafts of which have been exchanged. The parties intend to file shortly a motion for 

preliminary approval of the settlement, which motion is currently set to be heard by this 

Court on January 24, 2007; 

THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rules 83-143 and 6-144, the parties hereto, 

through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate that Volvo shall have up to 

and including January 31, 2007 to respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. 

The parties hereby respectfully request an Order of the Court granting the extension to 

which they have agreed. 

Dated: December ___, 2006 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By 

Molly J. Magnuson 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Volvo Cars of North America, LLP 

Dated: December ___, 2006 

FAZIO | MICHELETTI LLP 

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & 

BERNSTEIN, LLP 

By 

Jeffrey L. Fazio 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed 

Class 

Case 2:05-cv-01379-MCE -EFB Document 76 Filed 12/12/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

NB1:701667.1 3 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

PROPOSED ORDER - CASE NO. 2:05-CV-1379 

ORDER 

In light of their current negotiation of a settlement agreement, of which final 

agreement is close to being reached, and in light of the fact that the parties intend to file a 

motion for preliminary approval of the settlement agreement, which is currently set to be 

heard by this Court on January 24, 2007, the parties have filed a stipulation extending the 

deadline for Defendant Volvo Cars of North America, LLC (“Volvo”) to respond to 

Plaintiffs’ recently filed Second Amended Complaint until January 31, 2007. After full 

consideration of the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS 

Volvo an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint up to 

and including January 31, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 11, 2006 

 

 /s/ David F. Levi 

The Honorable David F. Levi 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01379-MCE -EFB Document 76 Filed 12/12/06 Page 3 of 3