Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03946/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03946-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1 David M. Bass (State Bar No. 117199)

Peter M. Cho (State Bat' No. 213870)

2 DAVI M. BASS & ASSOCIATES

2029 Centu Park East, 14th Floor

3. Los Angeles, Californa 90067

Telephone: (310) 789-1152

4 Facsimile: (310) 789- i 149

Eroail: dbass(íbaslawla.com

5

Attorneys for Defendat and Counterclai

6 Plainti TEAK WAREHOUSE, INc.

7

8

9

10

11

UND STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTIRN DISTRCT OF CALIFORN

SAN JOSE DMSION

12 KIGSLEY-BATE LTD., a Delaware

Corporàtion,

13

Case No. C~06-3946-RM (PVTx)

Plaitif, STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WIH

PREICE OF COMPLAI AN COUNRCLAI

.14

vs.

15 TEAK WAREHOUSE, INC., a California

16 Corporation,

17

Defendant. Complaint Filed: June 26, 2006

18 IEAK WAROUSE, INC., a Californa Corporation, .

19

20

Counterclaim Plaintiff,

vs.

21 KIGSLEY-BATE 

LTD., a Delaware

22 Corporation,

23

24 III

25 III

26 II i.

27 III

28 III

Counterclaim Defendat.

STIULATION OF D-i~1\SSAL WIll PREICE OF COMPLAI AN COUNRCLAIM

rC-06-3946-RM (PVTx))

AND ORDER *E-FILED - 1/10/08*

Case 5:06-cv-03946-RMW Document 45 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 4
I TO THE COURT AN TO ALL PARTmS AND THEIR ATTORNYS OF

2 RECORD:

3 This Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of Complaint and Counterclaim (the

4 "Stipulation") is made between Defendant and Counterclai Plaitiff TEAK WARHOUSE..

5 INC. ("Teak") and Plainti and Counterclaim Defendant KINGSLEY-BATE, LID.

6 ("Kigsley"), thugh their undersigned counsel of record, ptUant to Rules 41 (a)(1) and 41(c)

7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with reference to the following:

8 A. On Augus 29, 2007, Teak and Kisley paricipated in an Early Neutl

9 Evaluation Conference (the e'Ee") with Ealy Neutral Evaluator, Nathan Lane, III, Esq.

i 0 (Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, LLP, One Matime Plaza, Suite 300, San Fracisco, California

1 1 94111). The pares reached a conditional settement agre~ment at the ENEC.

12 B. Subsequent to the ENC; the paies fuer negotiated the terms of settlement,

13 and reached a formal agreement to sette the action in its entiety, including the Complaint and

14 Counterclaim.

15 c. On Janua -- 2008, Teak and Kingsley executed a ~tten Agreement of

16 Settlement and Mutu Release (the "Settlement Agreme!1t).

17 D. Puuat to pargrph 13 oftbe Settlement Agrement. the paries expressly

18 agred that the U.nited States Distrct Cour NOrem Distrct ofCaliforna, shall retain

19 jurisdcton over the pares to enforce the Settlement Agrement.

20 III

21 III

22 III

23 1/ I

24 III

2S III

26 / / I

27 I / I

28 III

1

STWULATION OF DISMISSAL WI PREICE OF COMPLAIT AN COUNTERCLAI

re-06-3946-RM (PVTx)) .

Case 5:06-cv-03946-RMW Document 45 Filed 01/10/08 Page 2 of 4
1 AccordinglYi IT is HEREBY STIULATED by and between the paies, though their

2. designated counsel, that the above-captioned action, including the Complaint and Counterclaim,

3 be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice puruant to Rules 41(a)(1) and 41(c) of the Federa

4 Rules of Civil Procedur.

S

6 Dated: Januar _, 2008

7

8

9

10

11 Dated: Januar !J, 2008

12

13

14

15

16

DAVI M. BASS & ASSOCIATES

By:

David M. Bass

Attorneys for Defendat and Counterclaim

Plaitif TE WARHOUSE, INC.

ASKEW & ASSOCIATES

Ú ~kl&

James A. Askew

omeys for Plaintif and Counterclaim

efenda!it KIGSLEY-BATE, LID.

17

18 IT is SO ORDERED:

19

20 January _,2008

Judge Ronald M. Whyte 21 United States District Court

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIULATION OF DISMISA wrr PREUDICE OF COMPLA AN COUNTERCLAI

rC-06-3946-RM (PVTx))

Case 5:06-cv-03946-RMW Document 45 Filed 01/10/08 Page 3 of 4
1 Accordingly, IT is HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the pares, through their

2 designated counsel. that the above-captioned action, inclu~ng the Complaint-and Counterclaim,

3 be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rules 41(a)(1) and 41(c) of the Federl

4. Rules of Civil Procedure.

S

6 Dated: January æ 2008

7

8

9

10

11 Dated: January _, 2008

12

13

14

15

16

17

DAVID M. BASS & ASSOCIATES

By:

~

David M. Bas

Attrneys for Defendant and Counterclaim

Plaintiff TEAK WARHOUSE, INc.

ASKEW & ASSOCIATES

By:

James A. Askew

Attorneys fOT Plaitiff and C01.terclaim

Defendant KINGSLEY.BA TE, LID.

18

19

20

21

IT is SO ORDERED:

January _,2008

Judge Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Court

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

S'flPULATlON OF DISMISSAL WITH PREICE OF COMPLAIT AND COUNRCLAIM

(C-06-3946-RM (PVTh))

10

Case 5:06-cv-03946-RMW Document 45 Filed 01/10/08 Page 4 of 4