Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00191/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00191-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SCOTT JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SHAHNAZ PARVEEN IQBAL, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-00191-KJM-AC 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff commenced this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 

1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., on January 25, 2015. (ECF No. 1.) On June 25, 2015, this 

court issued a minute order directing the parties to meet and confer to discuss settlement of the 

case. (ECF No. 12.) The court also directed the parties to “file a joint status report advising the 

court whether they have reached settlement or exhausted their efforts to settle within sixty (60) 

days.” (Id.) “If the parties believe they have exhausted their efforts to settle, they shall provide a 

report on the status of their settlement discussions, including the dates on which they have 

exchanged offers and the date settlement discussions concluded.” (Id.) 

 Here, the parties have not complied with the court’s order. On August 21, 2015, 

the parties filed a report stating: “The parties have been unable to reach a settlement in this case.” 

(ECF No. 13 at 1.) The case “still remains unresolved.” (Id.) The report says nothing about the 

parties’ efforts to exhaust settlement discussions, the dates on which the parties exchanged offers, 

Case 2:15-cv-00191-KJM-AC Document 14 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

and the date settlement discussions concluded. Hence, the status report does not meet the criteria 

set forth in this court’s order. Accordingly, the court STRIKES the parties’ status report (ECF 

No. 13) and DIRECTS the parties to file a new status report in compliance with the court’s order 

within seven (7) days of the date of this order. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 27, 2015. 

Case 2:15-cv-00191-KJM-AC Document 14 Filed 08/28/15 Page 2 of 2