Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02322/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02322-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO STAY

Case No.: 3:15-cv-02322-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John F. Hyland (SBN 178875)

jhyland@rhdtlaw.com

Jessica Riggin (SBN 281712)

jriggin@rhdtlaw.com

RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL LLP

100 Pine Street, Suite 2150

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 421-1800

Facsimile: (415) 421-1700

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CHRISTOPHER WADSWORTH, M.D.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Upon review of the Parties’ Stipulation to Stay, the Court hereby orders as follows: 

1. The above-captioned case is hereby stayed;

2. All currently scheduled dates and deadlines are removed from the Court’s calendar;

and

3. The Parties shall file a status report within fifteen (15) days of the date on which the 

State Personnel Board issues its final decision pursuant to Government Code 19582 in the matters

of In the Matter of Alleged Retaliation by Timothy Belavich, Eureka Daye, Andrew Deems, and 

CHRISTOPHER S. WADSWORTH, M.D.,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFREY BEARD; J. CLARK KELSO; 

TIMOTHY BELAVICH; RACHEL CHEN; 

COURTNEY CORRADO; EUREKA DAYE; 

ANDREW DEEMS; ERIC MONTHEI; CHERA 

VAN BURG; LAURA WHYTE; and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-cv-02322-EMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION TO STAY

[Civil Local Rule 7-12]

Date Action Filed: 5/22/2015

First Amended Complaint Filed: 6/3/2015

Case 3:15-cv-02322-EMC Document 36 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO STAY

Case No.: 3:15-cv-02322-EMC

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Eric Monthei (Case No. 15-0365WE) and Christopher Wadsworth v. California Department of 

Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Correctional Health Care Services, et al. (Case No. 15-

0355N) (or in the event the matters are not consolidated, within fifteen (15) days of the later 

decision) in which the Parties shall (a) apprise the Court of the outcome of the proceeding(s) and

(b) propose dates for the filing of Plaintiff Wadsworth’s Second Amended Complaint in this Case, 

for the filing of Defendants’ responsive pleadings, and for the Case Management Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________, 2015 ___________________________

Hon. Edward M. Chen

Judge of the United States District Court

Northern District of California

The 1/28/16 CMC is reset for 3/17/16 at 9:30 a.m. A joint CMC statement 

to confirm that the state board proceedings are moving forward and/or when 

parties expect a decision to be rendered shall be filed by 3/10/16. 12/23

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-02322-EMC Document 36 Filed 12/23/15 Page 2 of 2