Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02945/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02945-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint case

management statement filed in connection with a case management conference. Because the instant

action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case management conference has not

been scheduled.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARLENE MARILYN RAZZARI,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Defendant. /

No. C 16-2945 JSW

ORDER RE CONSENT

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to

reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. 

See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). The parties are DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than June 24, 2016,

as to whether they consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant

action.1

 For the parties’ convenience, consent forms are available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov,

in the “Forms” section. The parties are further advised that they may jointly request assignment to a

specific magistrate judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 2, 2016 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-02945-JCS Document 6 Filed 06/03/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:16-cv-02945-JCS Document 6 Filed 06/03/16 Page 2 of 2