Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01807/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01807-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Carolann Grey, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

First American Title Insurance Company;

America’s Servicing Company; US Bank

National Association; Bank of America

Funding 2007-6 Trust, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 09-1807-PHX-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ request for clarification (Doc. #16).

Defendants ask the Court to tell them whether this case is stayed because, prior to filing this

case, Plaintiff filed for bankruptcy. A Plaintiff filing bankruptcy does not trigger the

automatic stay provisions of the bankruptcy rules. See Martin-Trigona v. Champion Federal

Savings & Loan, 1988 WL 46596, *2 (N.D. Ill. 1988). Thus, the Court will not automatically

stay this case. This order is without prejudice to either party moving to stay the case if cause

can be shown or moving to dismiss the case if appropriate. See Suniga v. America’s

Servicing Company, 2009 WL 2358973 (D. Ariz. 2009).

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:09-cv-01807-JAT Document 17 Filed 10/22/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the request for clarification (Doc. #16) is granted to the limited

extent that the Court advises the parties that this case is not stayed.

DATED this 21st day of October, 2009.

Case 2:09-cv-01807-JAT Document 17 Filed 10/22/09 Page 2 of 2