Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-03048/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-03048-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JUSTIN RYAN TERVEER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GENA JONES, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:23-cv-03048-SCR P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By order filed October 4, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was found not to state any claim and 

sixty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The time granted for that purpose has 

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s 

order. 

 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 

 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to 

state a claim, for the reasons set out in the order filed October 4; for failure to prosecute; and for 

failure to follow a court order. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 21 days after 

being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 

Case 2:23-cv-03048-DAD-SCR Document 11 Filed 12/13/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: December 12, 2024 

Case 2:23-cv-03048-DAD-SCR Document 11 Filed 12/13/24 Page 2 of 2