Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05122/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05122-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

Case Number C-05-5122 JF 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN: 71450) (kkeller@kksrr.com)

ANNE E. KEARNS (SBN: 183336) (akearns@kksrr.com)

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP

114 Sansome Street, 4

th

Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 249-8330

Facsimile: (415) 249-8333

Attorneys for Plaintiff BERCUT-VANDERVOORT

& CO.

KENNETH B. WILSON (SBN 130009) (kwilson@perkinscoie.com)

K.C. ALLAN (SBN 231866) (kallan@perkinscoie.com)

PERKINS COIE LLP

180 Townsend Street, Third Floor

San Francisco, CA 94107-1909

Telephone: (415) 344-7000

Facsimile: (415) 344-7050

Attorneys for Defendant MAISON TARRIDE

LEDROIT & CIE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

BERCUT-VANDERVOORT & CO., a

California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAISON TARRIDE LEDROIT & CIE, a

French company,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C-05-5122 JF

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

CMC: May 5, 2006

Time: 10:30 a.m.

Judge: The Honorable Jeremy Fogel

Courtroom: 3

**E-filed 4/28/06**

Case 5:05-cv-05122-JF Document 20 Filed 04/28/06 Page 1 of 4
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

Case Number C-05-5122 JF 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff BERCUT-VANDERVOORT & CO. and Defendant MAISON TARRIDE

LEDROIT & CIE, by and through their respective counsel, hereby report that they have met and

conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R.,

Rule16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in mediation (ADR L.R. 6).

The parties agree to hold the mediation within120 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.

Dated: April 17, 2006 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILEY& ROMAN LLP

By:__________________/S/______________________

ANNE E. KEARNS

Attorneys for Plaintiff BERCUT-VANDERVOORT & CO.

Dated: April 17, 2006 PERKINS COIE LLP

By:__________________/S/______________________

K.C. ALLAN

Attorneys for Defendant MAISON TARRIDE LEDROIT & CIE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to mediation. The

deadline for mediation is 120 days from the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Date: __________________________________

THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

71749

4/26/06

Case 5:05-cv-05122-JF Document 20 Filed 04/28/06 Page 2 of 4
Case 5:05-cv-05122-JF Document 20 Filed 04/28/06 Page 3 of 4
Case 5:05-cv-05122-JF Document 20 Filed 04/28/06 Page 4 of 4