Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00176/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00176-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRY RENEE MCCLURE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PRISONER TRANSPORTATION 

SERVICES OF AMERICA, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:18-cv-0176-DAD-SKO

ORDER RE THE PARTIES’

STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE

SCHEDULING ORDER

(Doc. 121)

On January 31, 2020, pursuant to the Court’s order, (Doc. 119), the parties filed a 

“Stipulated Request to Modify Scheduling Order.” (Doc. 121.) The parties request that the Court 

extend the rebuttal expert disclosures deadline “as it pertains to Avalos’s expert disclosure only” 

until February 28, 2020; the expert discovery deadline until April 10, 2020; the non-dispositive 

motions filing and hearing deadlines to April 27, 2020 and May 29, 2020, respectively; and the 

dispositive motions filing and hearing deadlines to May 9, 2020 and June 29, 2020, respectively. 

(Id. at 2.) The parties request that the Court leave the settlement conference, pretrial conference, 

and trial dates unchanged. (Id.) 

The Court finds good cause to extend the deadlines in the scheduling order.

1

 As set forth 

during the informal discovery dispute conference on January 29, 2020 and in the Court’s order 

following the informal discovery dispute conference, (Doc. 119), the Court will allow the parties 

 

1 The Court will also continue the pretrial conference and trial dates to give the Court sufficient time to rule on 

dispositive motions and adjust certain of the parties’ dates to conform to the Court’s scheduling preferences. 

Case 1:18-cv-00176-ADA-SKO Document 122 Filed 02/03/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

additional time to complete expert discovery only as it relates to Dr. Wobrock, the expert disclosed 

by Defendants Leticia Monique Avalos and Fausto Avalos, and any rebuttal experts disclosed to 

rebut Dr. Wobrock.

2

 (See Doc. 119.) 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court will modify the scheduling order and enlarge 

the deadlines as follows: 

Event Prior Date Continued Date

Rebuttal Expert Disclosures

(pertaining to Dr. Wobrock and 

any rebuttal experts disclosed to 

rebut Dr. Wobrock only)

January 21, 2020 February 28, 2020

Expert Discovery Completion

(pertaining to Dr. Wobrock and 

any rebuttal experts disclosed to 

rebut Dr. Wobrock only)

January 30, 2020 April 10, 2020

Non-Dispositive Motion Filing February 18, 2020 April 27, 2020

Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing March 18, 2020 May 27, 2020

Dispositive Motion Filing March 2, 2020 May 8, 2020

Dispositive Motion Hearing April 21, 2020 June 16, 2020

Settlement Conference March 19, 2020 Unchanged 

Pretrial Conference June 29, 2020 August 24, 2020

Trial August 25, 2020 October 20, 2020

All other directives in the scheduling order, (Doc. 67), remain unchanged. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2020 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

2 As set forth during the informal discovery dispute conference, to the extent any party asserts that additional expert 

discovery is needed for any purpose other than discovery related to Dr. Wobrock and any rebuttal experts disclosed to 

rebut Dr. Wobrock, that party must submit a motion or stipulation establishing independent good cause for a 

modification of the scheduling order to permit such additional discovery. 

Case 1:18-cv-00176-ADA-SKO Document 122 Filed 02/03/20 Page 2 of 2