Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06730/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06730-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The court notes that Petitioner’s copy of the findings and recommendation was returned by the United States Postal 1

Service as undeliverable. However, pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(e), service on a petitioner at the address of record is fully

effective.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JON R. SIMPSON, CASE NO. CV-F-03-6730 OWW WMW HC

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RE

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

[Doc. 40]

RAYMOND ANDREWS, 

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On August 1, 2006, the Magistrate Judge entered findings and

recommendations herein. These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed

within thirty days. No objections were filed.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a de novo

review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983). th

Case 1:03-cv-06730-OWW -WMW Document 42 Filed 09/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

August 1, 2006, are a adopted in full;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 22, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06730-OWW -WMW Document 42 Filed 09/25/06 Page 2 of 2