Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01021/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01021-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL N:\PTC\LI2006\061009\00479465.DOC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Deputy 

KRISTINE A. POPLAWSKI, State Bar #160758

Deputy City Attorney 

1390 Market Street, Seventh Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3878 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3985 

E-Mail: kristine.poplawski@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Cross-Claimant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

MATTHEW F. GRAHAM, ESQ., State Bar #95194

mgraham@wendel.com 

TAMMY A. BROWN, ESQ., State Bar #172612

tbrown@wendel.com 

WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP 

1111 Broadway, 24th Floor 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Telephone: (510) 834-6600 

Facsimile: (510) 834-1928 

Attorneys for Cross-Defendant Neoplan USA 

Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND 

SURETY COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, a California municipal 

corporation; GENERAL MOTORS 

CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation; LORONIX, INC., a 

California corporation; VERINT 

SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C06-1021 PJH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO'S CLAIMS AGAINST 

NEOPLAN USA CORPORATION 

Date Action Filed: February 14, 2006 

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. 

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), and the parties’ Stipulation of 

Dismissal, cross-claimant City and County of San Francisco (the "City") moves for dismissal with 

prejudice of all causes of action asserted by it against cross-defendant Neoplan USA Corporation. 

CASE NO. C06-1021 PJH

Case 4:06-cv-01021-PJH Document 163 Filed 04/22/08 Page 1 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 N:\PTC\LI2006\061009\00479465.DOC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Upon consideration whereof and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all 

causes of action asserted by the City against Neoplan be, and the same hereby are, DISMISSED, with 

prejudice, with the parties bearing their own costs, attorneys’ fees, and expenses related to those 

claims. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: _______________________, 2008 

Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton 

United States District Court Judge 

Northern District of California 

CASE NO. C06-1021 PJH

April 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-01021-PJH Document 163 Filed 04/22/08 Page 2 of 3
PROOF OF SERVICE n:\ptc\li2006\061009\00479465.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Martina Hassett, declare as follows: 

I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the aboveentitled action. I am employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building, 

1390 Market Street, Seventh Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102. 

On April 21, 2008, I served the following document(s): 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO'S CLAIMS AGAINST NEOPLAN USA CORPORATION 

on the following persons: 

Matthew F. Graham, Esq. 

Tammy A. Brown, Esq. 

Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP 

1111 Broadway, 24th Floor 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Telephone: (510) 834-6600 

Facsimile: (510) 834-1928 

(Counsel for Neoplan USA Corporation)

Patricia M. Coleman, Esq. 

K. Lynn Finateri, Esq. 

Dykema Gossett LLP 

333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 457-1800 

Facsimile: (213) 457-1850 

(Counsel for Defendant General 

Motors Corp.) 

in the manner indicated below: 

BY E-FILING: Via the court-mandated e-filing service. 

I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed April 21, 2008, at San Francisco, California. 

 /s/ 

 Martina Hassett 

CASE NO. C06-1021 PJH

Case 4:06-cv-01021-PJH Document 163 Filed 04/22/08 Page 3 of 3