Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02257/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02257-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

Mirabal v. Ornoski 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Filing Traverse C 06-02257 MMC 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL SATRIS, SBN 067413 

MARGARET LITTLEFIELD, SBN 110938 

Law Offices of Michael Satris

Post Office Box 337 

Bolinas, CA 94924 

Telephone: (415) 868-9200 

Facsimile: (415) 868-2658 

Email: satris@earthlink.net 

Attorneys for Petitioner

Michael Reyes Mirabal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MICHAEL REYES MIRABAL, 

 Petitioner, 

 vs.

S. W. ORNOSKI, 

 Warden, San Quentin State Prison, Respondent.

No. C 06-02257 MMC 

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR A

FIVE-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME

FOR PETITIONER MIRABAL TO

FILE HIS TRAVERSE

Petitioner MICHAEL REYES MIRABAL, pursuant to the Court’s order of 

June 15, 2006, Civil Local Rules 6-1, subdivision (b), 6-2, and 7-11, through counsel, 

submits the following stipulation between the parties for extending the time for filing 

the traverse in this case by five (5) days from September 8, 2006, until September 13, 

2006, upon agreement and order by the Court. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:06-cv-02257-MMC Document 7 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 3
 Mirabal v. Ornoski 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Filing Traverse C 06-02257 MMC 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF COUNSEL IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATED REQUEST

I, Margaret Littlefield, declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State 

of California and of the United States: 

1. I am one of the attorneys for Petitioner MICHAEL REYES MIRABAL 

(“Mirabal”), who has retained the Law Offices of Michael Satris to represent him in

the within proceedings. I have been preparing the traverse in this case on behalf of 

Mirabal. 

2. By order of the district court filed June 15, 2006, Respondent Ornoski

(“Ornoski”) was directed to file an answer in this case on or before August 14, 2006, 

and Mirabal his traverse within thirty days of the filing of the answer. The answer

was filed on August 9, 2006, making Mirabal’s traverse due on September 8, 2006. 

3. The week of August 28, 2006, I began suffering from pain that I believed 

was related to sinus problems. As the week wore on the pain became so severe that I 

was unable to work consistently. At the beginning of the week I was diagnosed with 

a tooth infection requiring a root canal, which is scheduled for today. Because of my 

inability to work consistently in the last week and a half, I have been unable to

complete the traverse in Mirabal’s case so that it can be filed by September 8, 2006. 

4. I have spoken to Denise Yates, Deputy Attorney General representing 

Ornoski (Patricia Heim is out of the office this week), who has no objection to a few 

days’ extension of time for Mirabal to file his traverse. 

5. This stipulated agreement for extension of time is not made for purposes of 

delay. Mirabal meanwhile remains incarcerated pursuant to the judgment challenged 

in this action, and he has every incentive to timely prosecute his petition.

Dated: September 7, 2006 

/s/ Margaret Littlefield 

MARGARET LITTLEFIELD 

Case 3:06-cv-02257-MMC Document 7 Filed 09/08/06 Page 2 of 3
 Mirabal v. Ornoski 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Filing Traverse C 06-02257 MMC 

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, under the provisions of the Court’s order of June 15, 2006, and 

Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-11 COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER AND 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT HEREBY STIPULATE that Mirabal may file his

traverse to the answer on or before September 13, 2006. 

Dated: September 7, 2006 /s/ Margaret Littlefield MARGARET LITTLEFIELD 

Attorney for Petitioner

Dated: September 7, 2006 /s/ Denise Yates DENISE YATES 

Deputy Attorney General

Attorney for Respondent 

—————————————————————————————————— 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September ___, 2006 

 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

United States Judge 

8

Case 3:06-cv-02257-MMC Document 7 Filed 09/08/06 Page 3 of 3