Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01088/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01088-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAFAR AFSHAR,

NO. CIV. S-04-1088 LKK/JFM

Plaintiff,

v.

O R D E R

CITY OF SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO

POLICE DEPARTMENT; COUNTY OF

SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; and SHERIFF

LOU BLANAS, individually and in his

official capacity as Sheriff of the

Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department,

Defendants.

 /

The court is in receipt of defendants’ motion to strike

plaintiff’s supplemental disclosures as well as plaintiff’s motion

to amend the scheduling order. The motion to strike was originally

set for oral argument on May 30, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. On May 15,

2006, plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion to strike as well

as the motion to amend the scheduling order. Given that the two

motions present identical questions and given that defendants need

an opportunity to file an opposition to the motion to amend the

scheduling order, the court CONTINUES oral argument on both motions

Case 2:04-cv-01088-LKK -JFM Document 116 Filed 05/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

to June 12, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. Defendants shall file an opposition

to the motion to amend the scheduling order no later than May 30,

2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 17, 2006.

 /s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01088-LKK -JFM Document 116 Filed 05/18/06 Page 2 of 2