Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00219/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00219-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case Nos. C 06 219 JF RS & C 06 926 JF RS

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING ON MOTIONS FOR STAYS OF AND OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL

(DPSAGOK)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Michael Angelo MORALES,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

James E. TILTON, Acting Secretary of the

California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation, and Robert L. Ayers Jr., Acting

Warden of San Quentin State Prison,

 Defendants.

Case Number C 06 219 JF RS

Case Number C 06 926 JF RS

DEATH-PENALTY CASE

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING

ON MOTIONS FOR STAYS OF AND

OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S ORDER REGARDING

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO

COMPEL

[]

On Tuesday, September 12, 2006, the magistrate judge to whom the above-entitled action

is referred for discovery disputes issued an order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff’s

second motion to compel. The order compelled Defendants, nonparty witness Office of

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger of California, and nonparty witness California Office of the

Inspector General to produce documents, inter alia, by Friday, September 22, 2006, in light of the

evidentiary hearing in this action that is scheduled to commence on Tuesday, September 26,

2006.

Good cause appearing therefor, any motions for stays of or objections to the magistrate

judge’s order shall be filed not later than 9:00 a.m., Monday, September 18, 2006; any responses

to such motions or objections shall be filed not later than 5:00 p.m., Monday, September 18,

Case 3:06-cv-00219-RS Document 212 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case Nos. C 06 219 JF RS & C 06 926 JF RS

ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING ON MOTIONS FOR STAYS OF AND OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL

(DPSAGOK)

2006; any replies shall be filed not later than 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, September 19, 2006. Any party

or nonparty witness filing a motion for stay of or objection to the magistrate judge’s order shall

lodge with the Court the documents at issue for review in camera by emailing such documents to

the Court’s Death Penalty Staff Attorney at g_o_kolombatovich@cand.uscourts.gov not later

than 9:00 a.m., Monday, September 18, 2006. “The district judge to whom the case is assigned

shall consider such objections and shall modify or set aside any portion of the magistrate judge’s

order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Fed. R.Civ. P. 72(a); see also 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(A) (2006). Unless otherwise ordered, such motions for stays and objections shall be

deemed submitted at 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, September 19, 2006, without oral argument, pursuant to

Civil Local Rule 7-1(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 15, 2006 __________________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-00219-RS Document 212 Filed 09/15/06 Page 2 of 2