Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_20-cv-00249/USCOURTS-cand-4_20-cv-00249-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DANIEL C. WONG, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 20-cv-00249-YGR 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CHANGE OF 

ADDRESS; SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING

Pro se plaintiff Daniel C. Wong is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action 

should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and to follow this Court’s Civil Local Rules. 

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11, a party proceeding pro se whose address 

changes while an action is pending must promptly file and serve upon all opposing parties a notice 

of change of address specifying the new address. See L.R. 3-11(a). The Court may, without 

prejudice, dismiss a complaint when: (1) mail directed to the attorney or the pro se party by the 

court has been returned to the Court as not deliverable, and (2) the Court fails to receive within 

sixty days of this return a written communication from the attorney or pro se party indicating a 

current address. See L.R. 3-11(b). 

Here, plaintiff filed the present lawsuit in state court on or about December 11, 2019. It 

was removed to federal court on January 13, 2020. On February 10, 2020, and again on March 17, 

2020, court mail that was sent to plaintiff’s address was returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff has 

not filed anything on the docket since the case was removed. 

Accordingly, the Court hereby SETS a compliance hearing for 9:01 a.m. on Friday, June 

26, 2020, in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland, 

California. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, plaintiff shall file a 

notice indicating his current address. To be clear, the Court DOES NOT expect the parties to 

appear on the date of the compliance hearing, but rather, it is scheduled to remind the Court of 

Case 4:20-cv-00249-YGR Document 15 Filed 04/16/20 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

plaintiff’s filing deadline. If compliance is complete, the compliance hearing will be taken off 

calendar. Failure to file the notice will result in dismissal of the action without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 16, 2020 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00249-YGR Document 15 Filed 04/16/20 Page 2 of 2