Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00269/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00269-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Before the Court is the stipulation of the parties seeking to vacate the settlement 

conference. (Doc. 26) Counsel report that neither side is willing to offer a settlement on terms 

the opponent would accept. Id. at 2. Thus, the parties request the settlement conference be 

vacated. Id.

Good cause appearing, the Court VACATES the settlement conference set on January 22, 

2015. Should the parties agree in the future the matter is in a settlement posture, they may file a 

joint request for the Court to schedule a settlement conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 9, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JAMES WILLIAM NEAL III and 

CORDELIA NEAL,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CALIFORNIA CITY, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:14-CV-00269-AWI-JLT

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

VACATE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

(Doc. 26)

Case 1:14-cv-00269-CJC-JLT Document 27 Filed 12/09/14 Page 1 of 1