Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05137/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05137-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

YASMIN RAZZAK, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 14-cv-05137-EDL 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

On February 20, 2015, this Court issued an Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. # 29. The Order required Plaintiff to “file an amended 

complaint removing all allegations and claims relating to forced floor insurance or damage 

stemming therefrom, and providing more specificity and clarity regarding Chase’s alleged postlitigation conduct insofar as she can do so in good faith, by no later than March 4, 2015.” Id. at 7. 

Because Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss was untimely, and Plaintiff had also failed 

to appear for an ADR Phone Conference, the Order cautioned Plaintiff that “failure to make Court 

appearances at the time and date set by the Court . . . may result in monetary or other sanctions.” 

Id. at 8. 

Despite that warning, Plaintiff has failed to timely file an Amended Complaint as required 

by the Court’s Order. Defendant therefore filed a motion to dismiss this action with prejudice 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Dkt. # 30. Plaintiff has also failed to 

timely oppose this motion to dismiss. 

THE COURT hereby issues an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why Plaintiff's claims should 

not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. Plaintiff shall provide a written response to this Order to Show Cause regarding her 

Case 3:14-cv-05137-EDL Document 34 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

failure to timely file an amended complaint and failure to timely respond to Defendant’s motion to 

dismiss by no later than April 6, 2015. If plaintiff fails to timely respond to this Order to Show 

Cause, the case shall be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 30, 2015 

______________________________________ 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:14-cv-05137-EDL Document 34 Filed 03/30/15 Page 2 of 2