Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378-39/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING AND USE OF “JOINT” EXHIBITS 

DESIGNATED BY BOTH PARTIES, CASE NO. C 02 3378 EDL 

1

[Counsel Listed on Signature Page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, 

a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, 

v. 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA 

INTEGRATION, INC., formerly known as 

ACTA TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendant and Counterclaimant, 

 Case No. C 02 3378 EDL 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: FILING AND USE OF 

“JOINT” EXHIBITS DESIGNATED 

BY BOTH PARTIES

Pretrial Conference: 

February 20, 2007, 2:00 P.M. 

 

 Pursuant to the Court’s January 25, 2007 Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial 

(Docket No. 406), and the February 2, ,2007 Stipulation and Order Re: Pretrial Submissions (Docket 

No. 465), both parties are to lodge with the Court two sets of premarked and tabbed exhibits that each 

intends to use at trial. During the meet and confer process, in an effort to decrease the number of 

documents lodged with the Court, the parties have agreed to submit only one copy of those exhibits 

that both parties have identified as one they intend to use at trial. The parties have agreed that plaintiff 

Informatica Corporation (“Informatica”) will include a hard copy of each of these “joint” exhibits in 

the two sets that it lodges with the Court. Thus, defendant Business Objects Data Integration, Inc. 

(“BODI”) has not lodged hard copies of any “joint” exhibits with the Court, but has retained reference 

to each such exhibit in the exhibit list it will file with the Court by cross- referencing plaintiff’s exhibit 

number. 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 472 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 474 Filed 02/12/07 Page 1 of 3
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING AND USE OF “JOINT” EXHIBITS 

DESIGNATED BY BOTH PARTIES, CASE NO. C 02 3378 EDL 

2

 The parties have agreed that, although BODI is not required to lodge a hard copy of any “joint” 

exhibit with the Court, it is entitled to use any “joint” exhibit at trial without limitation, subject to 

Informatica’s objections, as though it had separately lodged that exhibit with the Court. The parties 

have agreed that BODI may offer any “joint” exhibit into evidence even if Informatica removes that 

exhibit from its exhibit list or does not offer that exhibit into evidence during the trial. This agreement 

does not withdraw or in any way affect each party’s objections to the other party’s use of any “joint” 

exhibit. 

 The parties respectfully request that the Court grant this stipulation. 

Dated: February 12, 2007 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Carolyn Chang 

Carolyn Chang 

 Lynn H. Pasahow (CSB NO. 054283) 

 e-mail: lpasahow@fenwick.com 

J. David Hadden (CSB NO. 176148) 

 e-mail: dhadden@fenwick.com 

Darren E. Donnelly (CSB NO. 194335) 

 e-mail: ddonnelly@fenwick.com 

Carolyn Chang (CSB NO. 217933) 

 e-mail: cchang@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB No. 223936) 

 e-mail: dschumann@fenwick.com 

DAVID M. LACY KUSTERS (CSB NO. 

241335) 

 e-mail: dlacykusters@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 472 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 474 Filed 02/12/07 Page 2 of 3
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING AND USE OF “JOINT” EXHIBITS 

DESIGNATED BY BOTH PARTIES, CASE NO. C 02 3378 EDL 

3

Dated: February 12, 2007 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

By: /s/ Robert D. Tadlock 

Robert D. Tadlock 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

Daniel J. Furniss (State Bar No. 73531), 

djfurniss@townsend.com 

Joseph A. Greco (State Bar No. 104476), 

jagreco@townsend.com 

Peter H. Goldsmith (State Bar No. 91294), 

phgoldsmith@townsend.com 

Robert J. Artuz (State Bar No. 227789), 

rjartuz@townsend.com 

Robert D. Tadlock (State Bar No. 238479), 

rdtadlock@townsend.com 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400 

Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

FOUNTAINHEAD LAW GROUP 

Chad R. Walsh (State Bar No. 214290), 

crwalsh@townsend.com 

900 Lafayette Street, Suite 509 

Santa Clara, California 95050 

Telephone: (408) 244-6319 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA 

INTEGRATION, INC. 

ORDER

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 12, 2007 .

 ________________________________ 

 Elizabeth D. Laporte 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 472 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 3 of 3

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 474 Filed 02/12/07 Page 3 of 3