Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_07-cv-00335/USCOURTS-azd-4_07-cv-00335-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mary L. Loeffler-Boggia, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of

Social Security, 

Defendant

)

) No. CV 07-335-TUC-FRZ (JM)

)

) ORDER

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment pertaining to

the denial of disability benefits. Also pending before the Court is Defendant's Cross-Motion

for Summary Judgment regarding the same denial of disability benefits. 

United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Marshall issued a Report and

Recommendation on November 18, 2008. In that Report and Recommendation, Magistrate

Judge Marshall recommended denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and

granting Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment.

The Report and Recommendation indicated that any party could file written objections

within ten days after being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. The

parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. As such, the Court will

not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Marshall’s

recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72;

Case 4:07-cv-00335-FRZ Document 25 Filed 02/13/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14

F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) United States Magistrate Judge Marshall's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #24) is

ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED.

(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #14) is DENIED.

(3) Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #21) is GRANTED. This case

is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

(4) The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file

in this matter.

DATED this 11th day of February, 2009.

Case 4:07-cv-00335-FRZ Document 25 Filed 02/13/09 Page 2 of 2