Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-01544/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-01544-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 29:1104 E.R.I.S.A.: Recovery of Benefits to Employee

---

1 

2 

~~w,., '~ _\- l / t~ ....... 

11'~~~ ~--~·~ !:\i t> JW:.~ ':f,1:,,._1' 1-.:M;:.JJ 

.•.... - -----~ 

EC 0 4 20iB 

-- -

3 

4 

5 

CLERK US DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHcRN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT c __ l::\jy\6 DEPUTY 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

6 GAYLE M. FOWLER, a 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

California individual, 

v. 

THE UNIVERSITY OF 

PHOENIX, INC., an AZ 

corporation, et al., 

13 HAYES, Judge: 

Case No.: 18cv1544-WQH-MSB 

Plaintiff, ORDER 

Defendants. 

14 

15 

On November 28, 2018, Plaintiff Gayle Fowler, proceeding prose, filed a Motion 

(ECF No. 51) for leave to file a second surreply to the Motions to Dismiss filed by 

16 Defendants (ECF Nos. 25, 28). The Court has reviewed the filings of the parties. 

17 Defendants' Response (ECF No. 50) to Plaintiffs first surreply (ECF No. 45) does not 

18 raise new arguments in support of the motions to dismiss. Plaintiff has not shown cause 

19 upon which the Court should exercise its discretion to permit the filing of a surreply. 

20 Plaintiffs Motion (ECF No. 51) for leave to file a second surreply is denied. See Garcia 

21 

v. Biter, 195 F. Supp. 3d 1131, 1134 (E.D. Cal. 2016) (denying prose plaintiff leave to file 

22 surreply where reply did not raise new evidence or arguments). 

23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second surreply 

24 is denied. (ECF No. 51 ). 

25 

26 DATED: 

27 

28 

I 

United States District Judge 

18cvl544-WQH-MSB 

Case 3:18-cv-01544-WQH-MSB Document 55 Filed 12/04/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 1