Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02042/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02042-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

James J. Arendt, Esq. Bar No. 142937

Brande L. Gustafson, Esq. Bar No. 267130

Weakley & Arendt, LLP

1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176

Fresno, California 93710

Telephone: (559) 221-5256

Facsimile: (559) 221-5262

James@walaw-fresno.com

Brande@walaw-fresno.com

Attorneys for Defendants, Kings County, Kings County Sheriff’s Department, Shawn McRae, 

and Marius Barsteceanu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN E. CRAWLEY, 

NORMA CRAWLEY, individually and as 

successor in interest to THE ESTATE OF

STEPHEN E. CRAWLEY, and JOHNNY 

CRAWLEY, individually, 

 Plaintiffs,

vs.

KINGS COUNTY, KINGS COUNTY 

SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, DAVE 

ROBINSON, in his individual and official 

capacity as Kings County Sheriff, and DOES 

1-50, inclusive,

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:13-cv-02042 LJO-SAB

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

AMENDING THE SCHEDULING 

ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR 

DESIGNATION OF EXPERT 

WITNESSES AND RULE 26 REPORTS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, through their respective counsel, 

that the Scheduling Order, Doc. No. 34, be amended as follows:

Current Deadline Proposed Deadline

Expert Disclosure May 14, 2015 June 4, 2015

There is good cause for extending these dates. First, the parties have expressed an 

interest in discussing settlement of this matter. Extending the expert designation will allow the 

parties to do so without incurring unnecessary costs of experts. Further, this will allow the 

Case 1:13-cv-02042-LJO-SAB Document 54 Filed 05/12/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

parties to complete non-expert discovery and ensure their experts have ample time to consider 

all information prior to preparing their Rule 26 expert reports.

This proposed extension will not affect any of the other deadlines in this matter.

DATE: May 11, 2015 WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP

By: /s/ James J. Arendt 

James J. Arendt

Brande L. Gustafson

Attorneys for Defendants

DATE: May 11, 2015 WILLIAM L. SCHMIDT, P.C.

By: /s/ William L. Schmidt 

William L. Schmidt

Attorney for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-02042-LJO-SAB Document 54 Filed 05/12/15 Page 2 of 2