Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01079/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01079-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 16:1538 Endangered Species Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARUK TRIBE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WILLIAM STELLE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-01079-MMC 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 68

Before the Court is federal defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time, filed May 19, 

2016, by which motion federal defendants seek a thirty-day extension of their May 20, 

2016 deadline to respond to plaintiffs’ complaint. The motion, however, is not filed in 

accordance with the Civil Local Rules of this district, which (1) require a supporting 

declaration setting forth, inter alia, “the efforts the party has made to obtain a stipulation 

to the time change,” and (2) provide for opposition to be filed within four days of the date 

the motion is filed. See Civil L.R. 6-3(a)(2), (b).

Accordingly, the motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice to federal defendants’

filing a motion or stipulation that complies with the Civil Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 19, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-01079-MMC Document 69 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 1