Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01605/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01605-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 On December 4, 2006, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Objections to Magistrate 1

Judge’s Order filed November 14, 2006,” which was construed as a request for reconsideration

of the magistrate judge’s order denying plaintiff’s request for partial summary judgment and

request for appointment of counsel. However, those objections did not address the

recommendation that claims against defendants Farris, Singletary, and Hansen be dismissed

without prejudice. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW R. LOPEZ,

Plaintiff, 2:03-cv-1605-GEB-DAD-P

vs.

 S. COOK, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 14, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

1

Case 2:03-cv-01605-KJM-DB Document 89 Filed 12/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 14, 2006 are adopted in

full; and 

2. The claims against defendants Farris, Singletary, and Hansen are dismissed

without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Dated: December 22, 2006

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01605-KJM-DB Document 89 Filed 12/22/06 Page 2 of 2