Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01047/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01047-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORENZO HALL,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-09-1047 MMC

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO

CHANGE PRETRIAL ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ stipulation, filed April 22, 2010, to continue the trial in

the above-titled action from September 13, 2010 to February 28, 2011, and for various

extensions of all pretrial deadlines and dates in connection therewith.

The asserted grounds are a trial in which counsel for the parties presently are

engaged, and upcoming trials in which plaintiff’s counsel anticipates he will be engaged

during the month of April and “part of” the month of May 2010. (See Stipulation at 1:26 -

2:3.)

The current trial date and pretrial schedule herein were set at a Case Management

Conference conducted on August 7, 2009, well over a year before the scheduled trial date;

counsel for both parties appeared at that time and no party voiced any concern about or

identified any conflict with the dates selected. Nor have the parties made any showing as

to their diligence in conducting discovery in the months prior to the filing of the instant

Case 3:09-cv-01047-MMC Document 26 Filed 04/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

stipulation.

Accordingly, good cause not having been shown, the stipulation is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01047-MMC Document 26 Filed 04/26/10 Page 2 of 2