Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02660/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02660-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING

OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 6-2(A) 

COUNSEL LISTED ON NEXT PAGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAVID HALTERMAN

Plaintiff,

v.

LEGATO SOFTWARE, a Division of

EMC Corporation; EMC Corporation,

dba EMC PERIPHERALS INC.; and

DOES I - X,

Defendants.

_______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C04-2660 JW (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING

OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE

PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 6-2(A)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:04-cv-02660-JW Document 291 Filed 04/17/06 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING

OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 6-2(A) 

KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON (State Bar # 70636)

DICKSON - ROSS LLP

1970 Broadway, Suite 1045

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 268-1999

Facsimile: (510) 268-3627

DAVID ANGLE (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

ANGLE & ANGLE LLC

1920 13th Street, Suite C

Boulder, CO 80302

Phone: 303-443-2200

Facsimile 303-443-2229

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DAVID HALTERMAN

GARY SINISCALCO (State Bar # 64770)

MICHAEL D. WEIL (State Bar # 209056)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE

The Orrick Building

405 Howard Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-2669

Telephone: 415-773-5700

Facsimile: 415-773-5759

LYNNE C. HERMLE (State Bar # 99799)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025-1021

Telephone: 650-614-7400

Facsimile: 650-614-7401

LEANNE FITZGERALD (admitted Pro Hac Vice)

EMC CORPORATION

2350 West El Camino Real

Mountain View, CA 94040

Attorneys for Defendant

EMC CORPORATION

Case 5:04-cv-02660-JW Document 291 Filed 04/17/06 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING

OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 6-2(A) 1

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2(a), Plaintiff David Halterman and Defendant EMC

Corporation (collectively, “the parties”) stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the November 29, 2005 Order Following Preliminary Pretrial Conference

provided that in limine motions be filed on March 31, 2006, and that any opposition be filed three

weeks later on April 21, 2006;

WHEREAS, on March 30, 2006, the Court issued an Order Continuing Deadline For Filing

Motions In Limine, continuing the deadline for filing motion in limine from March 31, 2006 to April

7, 2006, in light of a pending motion before the Court;

WHEREAS, the Court’s March 30, 2006 Order had the effect of reducing the time for the

parties to prepare and file any opposition to motions in limine, from three weeks to two weeks;

WHEREAS, on April 7, 2006, Defendant filed nine motions in limine (many of which

address several different categories of evidence), and Plaintiff filed four motions in limine;

WHEREAS, the schedule of Plaintiff’s counsel, both in this case and in other pending

matters, will make it virtually impossible for Plaintiff’s counsel to fully and properly respond to

Defendant’s motions in limine in the shortened two week period;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel believes that having an additional weekend to work on the

preparation of their opposition briefs will greatly assist them in completing those briefs, and in

presenting their arguments in a manner that will ultimately assist the Court in reviewing and ruling

upon the motions in limine;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their

designated counsel, that the parties respectfully request this Court to modify the November 29,

2005 Order Following Preliminary Pretrial Conference, by continuing the deadline for filing

oppositions to motions in limine from Friday, April 21, 2006, to Monday, April 24, 2006.

//

//

//

//

//

Case 5:04-cv-02660-JW Document 291 Filed 04/17/06 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING

OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 6-2(A) 2

DICKSON-ROSS LLP

/s/ electronically

Date: April 12, 2006, 2005

Jeffrey A. Ross

Attorneys for Plaintiff

David Halterman

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE

SIGNED IN COUNTERPART

Date:

Michael D. Weil

Attorneys for Defendant

EMC Corporation

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

 JAMES WARE

 United States District Judge

04/17/06

Case 5:04-cv-02660-JW Document 291 Filed 04/17/06 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR FILING

OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 6-2(A) 3

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X.B., I attest that concurrence in the

electronic filing of this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING

DEADLINE FOR FILING OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE PURSUANT TO

CIV. L.R. 6-2(A) was obtained from Michael D. Weil.

/s/ electronically

Date: April 12, 2006

Jeffrey A. Ross

Attorneys for Plaintiff

David Halterman

Case 5:04-cv-02660-JW Document 291 Filed 04/17/06 Page 5 of 5