Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00014/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00014-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Steven G. Rosales

Attorney at Law: 222224

12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115

Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670

Tel: (562)868-5886

Fax: (562)868-5491

E-Mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JOSE A. RODRIGUEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE A. RODRIGUEZ

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security.

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00014-GSA 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE 

SUMMONS, COMPLAINT AND 

OTHER DOCUMENTS

TO THE HONORABLE GARY S. AUSTIN, UNITED STATES 

DISTRICT COURT, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate, 

subject to the Court’s approval, that the deadline in which Plaintiff must serve the 

summons, complaint and other documents in accordance with paragraph 1 of the 

Court’s Scheduling Order, shall be extended to July 11, 2014, and that all 

subsequent deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order shall be extended 

accordingly. 

Counsel for plaintiff has caused the need for this extension request. 

Although counsel for plaintiff did attempt to comply with paragraph 1 of the 

Scheduling Order in good faith (See, Docket No. 6 , Summons Returned Executed) 

counsel for plaintiff made the mistake of mailing the Summons and Complaint to 

Case 1:14-cv-00014-GSA Document 12 Filed 07/17/14 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the incorrect Office of Regional Counsel and United States Attorney’s Office. See 

Docket No. 6 page 4. This caused the confusion that led to this delay. Counsel for 

plaintiff apologizes to the Court and to all those involved for this oversight. The 

parties respectfully request that the Court grant this extension request for the 

proper briefing of this claim.

DATE: July 10, 2014 Respectfully submitted,

 LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING

/s/ Steven G. Rosales

 BY: _______________________

 Steven G. Rosales

 Attorney for plaintiff Mr. Jose A. Rodriguez 

 

DATE: July 10, 2014 BENJAMIN WAGNER.

 United States Attorney 

 

 

/s/ Peter Thompson

 BY: ____________________________

Peter Thompson

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for defendant Carolyn W. Colvin

 (*authorized by e-mail)

 

ORDER

Based on the parties’ stipulation set forth above and in light of the proof of 

service filed Plaintiff at Docs. 10 and 11, the deadline for Plaintiff to serve the 

Defendant is hereby extended to July 11, 2014 nunc pro tunc.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 17, 2014 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00014-GSA Document 12 Filed 07/17/14 Page 2 of 2