Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00880/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00880-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

BENJAMIN LEMUS, on behalf of himself and

similarly situated others,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DOUGLAS CLARK dba CLARK’S

HARDWOOD FLOORS and DOES 1-10,

Defendants. /

No. C10-00880 HRL

ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

SANCTIONS

Plaintiff filed this action on March 2, 2010. On May 21, 2010, the court granted

defendant’s unopposed request to continue the case management conference to June 22, 2010

and directed the parties to file their joint case management statement by June 15, 2010. (See

Docket No. 10). On June 16, 2010, defendant filed a separate case management statement in

which he advises that plaintiff’s counsel failed to respond to efforts to prepare a joint case

management statement, among other things. To date, plaintiff has failed to file a case

management statement as required by Civil Local Rule 16-9 and this court’s May 21, 2010

order.

Accordingly, the initial case management conference set for June 22, 2010 is continued

to June 29, 2010, 1:30 p.m. The parties’ joint case management statement shall be filed no

later than June 22, 2010.

*E-FILED 06-17-2010*

Case 5:10-cv-00880-HRL Document 13 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Additionally, plaintiff’s counsel, Adam Wang, shall appear at the June 29, 2010 case

management conference and show cause, if any, why he should not be sanctioned or why this

case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with this court’s

order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated:

 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

June 17, 2010

Case 5:10-cv-00880-HRL Document 13 Filed 06/17/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:10-cv-00880-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Adam Wang adamqwang@gmail.com, alpedersen@gmail.com, rosilenda@gmail.com

Pascal Anastasi pascal@anastasiesq.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not

registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Case 5:10-cv-00880-HRL Document 13 Filed 06/17/10 Page 3 of 3