Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01507/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01507-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MEDIATION Case No. C 05-01507 WHA 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50637/90044.1 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

David Eiseman (Cal. Bar No. 114758) 

Albert P. Bedecarre (Cal. Bar No. 148178) 

Helen E. Dutton (Cal. Bar No. 235558) 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile (415) 875-6700 

davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com 

albedecarre@quinnemanuel.com 

helendutton@quinnemanuel.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SILICONIX INCORPORATED 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Brent Caslin (Cal. Bar No. 198682) William A. Streff, Jr. (Ill. Bar No. 2753979) 

Emily Terrell (Cal. Bar No. 234353) Paul R. Steadman (pro hac vice)

777 South Figueroa Street, Floor 37 Tomoko Itogo (Cal. Bar No. 207097) 

Los Angeles, California 90017 200 East Randolph Drive 

Telephone: (213) 680-8400 Chicago, Illinois 60601-6636 

Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 Telephone: (312) 861-2000 

bcaslin@kirkland.com Facsimile: (312) 861-2200 

eterrell@kirkland.com wstreff@kirkland.com 

 psteadman@kirkland.com 

 titoga@kirkland.com 

Attorneys for Defendants DENSO CORPORATION and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC. 

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SILICONIX INCORPORATED, a Delaware 

corporation,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

DENSO CORPORATION, a Japanese 

corporation, and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC., a 

Michigan corporation, 

 Defendants; 

AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIMS. 

Case No. C 05-01507 WHA 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING THE 

MEDIATION DEADLINE FOR CASE 

NO. C 05-01507 TO MARCH 10, 2006 

The Honorable William H. Alsup 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 45 Filed 11/02/05 Page 1 of 3
 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MEDIATION Case No. C 05-01507 WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50637/90044.1 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Judge Patel’s October 3, 2005 order addressing ADR issues in 

this action, Siliconix, DENSO, and TD SCAN are required to engage in a private mediation 

before January 31, 2006; 

WHEREAS counsel for Siliconix, on the one hand, and counsel for DENSO and TD 

SCAN, on the other, have agreed that the Honorable Layn R. Phillips (retired) will mediate this 

action;

WHEREAS, lead counsel for DENSO and TD SCAN will be in trial for the first half of 

December 2005 and lead counsel for Siliconix will be in trial for much of January 2006; and 

WHEREAS, Siliconix, DENSO, and TD SCAN have tentatively scheduled the mediation 

in this action to take place with the Honorable Layn R. Phillips (retired) on February 24, 2006. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Siliconix on the one hand, 

and DENSO and TD SCAN on the other hand, through their respective counsel, as follows: 

1. The parties select as their mediator the Honorable Layn R. Phillips (retired) of 

Irell & Manella LLP, Newport Beach, California. 

2. The deadline for private mediation to take place in this action is, subject to Court 

approval, extended to March 10, 2006. 

Dated: November 1, 2005 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

 OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

 BY /s/ David Eiseman 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 SILICONIX INCORPORATED 

Dated: November 1, 2005 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

 BY: /s/ Brent Caslin 

 Attorneys for Defendants DENSO 

 CORPORATION and TD SCAN (U.S.A.) INC. 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 45 Filed 11/02/05 Page 2 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MEDIATION Case No. C 05-01507 WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50637/90044.1 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The mediation in this action 

must be completed by March 10, 2006. The parties to that mediation, Siliconix, DENSO, and 

TD SCAN, shall file a status report regarding the mediation five days after the mediation takes 

place. 

Dated: November ____, 2005 

 THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

2

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 45 Filed 11/02/05 Page 3 of 3