Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00971/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00971-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MEYER’S PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE INSTANTER MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR CALPHALON’S REQUEST 

FOR PREJUDGMENT INTEREST UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 289 AND JULIE DAVIS’ TESTIMONY REGARDING SAME 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-00971-WBS-DAD 

D

y

kem

a

G

ossett

333 S. Gran

d

Aven

ue, Suite 2100

Los A

ngeles, California 90071

DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP 

K. LYNN FINATERI, SBN: 196488 

DEAN A. DICKIE, admitted pro hac vice 

ALLAN J. STERNSTEIN, admitted pro hac vice 

333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Telephone: (213) 457-1800 

Facsimile: (213) 457-1850 

lfinateri@dykema.com

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimants 

MEYER CORPORATION, U.S. and 

MEYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES LIMITED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION – ECF PROGRAM 

CALPHALON CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MEYER CORPORATION, U.S., 

Defendant. 

MEYER CORPORATION, U.S. and MEYER 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES LIMITED, 

 Counterclaimants, 

vs. 

CALPHALON CORPORATION, 

 Counterdefendant. 

Case No.: 2:05-CV-00971-WBS-DAD 

Assigned to the Honorable William B. Shubb 

ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANTS’ 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

INSTANTER THEIR MOTION IN LIMINE

TO BAR CALPHALON’S REQUEST FOR 

PREJUDGMENT INTEREST UNDER 35 

U.S.C. § 289 AND JULIE DAVIS’ 

TESTIMONY REGARDING SAME 

Trial

Date: September 12, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Ctrm: 5, Hon. William B. Shubb 

On August 30, 2006, Defendant/Counterclaimants Meyer Corporation, U.S. and Meyer 

Intellectual Properties Limited (“Meyer”) requested leave to file instanter their Motion In Limine

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00971-WBS -DAD Document 158 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 

MEYER’S PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE INSTANTER MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR CALPHALON’S REQUEST 

FOR PREJUDGMENT INTEREST UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 289 AND JULIE DAVIS’ TESTIMONY REGARDING SAME 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-00971-WBS-DAD 

D

y

kem

a

G

ossett

333 S. Gran

d

Aven

ue, Suite 2100

Los A

ngeles, California 90071

To Bar Calphalon’s Request For Prejudgment Interest Under 35 U.S.C. § 289 And Julie Davis’ 

Testimony Regarding Same. 

Good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

Meyer’s request to file instanter their Motion In Limine To Bar Calphalon’s Request For 

Prejudgment Interest Under 35 U.S.C. § 289 And Julie Davis’ Testimony Regarding Same is 

granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED this 31st day of August, 2006. 

Presented by: 

DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP 

/s/ Dean A. Dickie 

K. Lynn Finateri, Esq. 

Dean A. Dickie, Esq. 

Allan J. Sternstein, Esq. 

Attorneys For Defendant/Counterclaimants 

Meyer Corporation, U.S. and Meyer Intellectual 

Properties Limited 

CHICAGO\2233164.1 

ID\RKV 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00971-WBS -DAD Document 158 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 2