Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06153/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06153-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIE NANETTE LEGGITT ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CENTILLIUM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C-06-06153 (EDL)

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

OF “BLATANT REFUSAL OF DEFENSE

TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY”

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s “Complaint Regarding Blatant Refusal of Defense to

Conduct Discovery.” It is unclear what relief Plaintiff seeks from the Court. Plaintiff appears to be

seeking discovery, but it does not appear that Plaintiff has any pending requests for documents,

depositions, or other discovery that she has served upon Defendants. It is up to Defendant, not the

Court, to decide what discovery Defendant wishes to pursue to develop its defense, and Plaintiff’s

request is therefore DENIED. Plaintiff is encouraged to look at the District Court’s pro se

handbook, available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/. The handbook has a

chapter addressing the discovery process. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2008 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-06153-EDL Document 58 Filed 01/28/08 Page 1 of 1