Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-00130/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-00130-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

TSVETEN S TORBOV,

Plaintiff,

v.

CENLAR AGENCY, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-00130-BLF 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS; AND 

ADDRESSING BRIEFING OF MOTION

Defendants’ motion to dismiss was filed on December 19, 2014 and set for hearing on 

April 2, 2015. Under the Court’s Civil Local Rules, any opposition was due within fourteen days 

after the filing of the motion. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). Plaintiff filed opposition approximately three 

and one-half months after that deadline, on March 24, 2015. See Pl.’s Opp., ECF 98-99. The 

opposition indicates that Plaintiff retained new counsel earlier in March and that counsel 

submitted the opposition after researching the facts of the case and obtaining relevant documents.

Defendants are granted until April 3, 2015 to file a reply brief responding to the 

substantive arguments raised in Plaintiff’s opposition. Defendants are not precluded from arguing

in the reply brief that the Court should not consider Plaintiff’s untimely opposition.

The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss is continued from April 2, 2015 to April 9, 

2015 at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2015

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-00130-BLF Document 101 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 1