Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-02753/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-02753-35/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUZANNE D. JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM FISCHER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 11-cv-2753-PJH 

ORDER OF REFERENCE TO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to Local Rule 72-1, this matter is referred to a Magistrate Judge for 

resolution of defendants' motion to compel discovery, and for all further discovery

disputes. Any date for hearing on discovery motions previously noticed on the 

undersigned's calendar is VACATED.

After the parties have met and conferred, they shall prepare a joint letter of not 

more than 5 pages explaining the dispute. Up to 12 pages of attachments may be 

added. The joint letter must be electronically filed under the Civil Events category of 

"Motions and Related Filings > Motions--General > Discovery Letter Brief." The 

Magistrate Judge to whom the matter is assigned will advise the parties of how that 

Judge intends to proceed. The Magistrate Judge may issue a ruling, order more formal 

briefing, or set a telephone conference or a hearing. After a Magistrate Judge has been 

assigned, all further discovery matters shall be filed pursuant to that Judge's procedures.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2016

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

cc: MagRef, Assigned M/J, counsel of record

Case 4:11-cv-02753-PJH Document 324 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 1