Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca9-06-55678/USCOURTS-ca9-06-55678-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 

---

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

FilED 

JUL 202007 

CATHY A. CATIERSONI-QLERK U.S. COURT OF APPCALS 

TIMOTHY C. GANTT, No. 06-55678 

Petitioner - Appellee, D.C. No. CV-98-0l487-DSF 

v. 

MEMORANDUM * 

A.K. SCRIBNER, Warden, 

Before: 

Respondent - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Central District of California 

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding 

Argued and Submitted July 13,2007 

Pasadena, California 

KOZINSKI and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and SANDOVAL, ** 

District Judge. 

1. The -district court didn't clearly err in finding that the state failed to 

disclose the disputed evidence at a time when it would have been useful, as 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not 

precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. 

** The Honorable Brian E. Sandoval, United States District Judge for 

the District of Nevada, sitting by designation. 

Case: 06-55678 07/20/2007 ID: 6236923 DktEntry: 36 Page: 1 of 2
page 2 

required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). See Anderson v. City of 

Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573 (1985). 

2. Respondent doesn't offer any substantial reason for departing from the 

law of the case and reversing Gantt v. Roe, 389 F.3d 908 (9th Cir. 2004). See 

Milgard Tempering, Inc. v. Selas Corp. of America, 902 F.2d 703, 715 (9th Cir. 

1990). 

AFFIRMED. 

Case: 06-55678 07/20/2007 ID: 6236923 DktEntry: 36 Page: 2 of 2