Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02474/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02474-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 The stricken amended complaint was duplicative of the amended complaint, filed on 1

March 2, 2006, on which this matter proceeds, the only difference being that one page of exhibits

was omitted from the stricken version.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN ADAMS, No. 2:04-cv-2474-MCE-GGH-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

TERESA SCHWARTZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

On February 2, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued an order striking plaintiff’s amended

complaint, filed on February 28, 2006 ; a duplicative summary judgment motion, filed on April 1

21, 2006; and disregarding/vacating his motion for summary judgment, filed on April 12, 2006,

as defective. Plaintiff has filed what the court construes as a request for reconsideration of that

order with regard to his summary judgment motion having been disregarded/vacated as defective. 

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-02474-MCE -GGH Document 33 Filed 03/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge, filed February 2, 2007, is affirmed. 

Dated: February 28, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02474-MCE -GGH Document 33 Filed 03/01/07 Page 2 of 2