Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02263/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02263-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT A. GIBBS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SHASTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:18-cv-2263 MCE AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff proceeds pro se with a civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 

alleging a denial of his due process rights, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Plaintiff seeks to challenge conditions of his prior confinement in the Shasta County Jail. 

However, plaintiff has filed a notice of address change indicating that he is no longer 

incarcerated.1

 Therefore, he must therefore complete and submit a non-prisoner application to 

1

 The inmate locator website operated by the Shasta County Jail indicates that plaintiff is not 

presently incarcerated in that facility. See https://www.co.shasta.ca.us/index/sheriff/custody

The court has also verified that plaintiff is not incarcerated under the authority of the California 

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. See http://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/search.aspx. 

See also Fed. R. Evid. 201 (court may take judicial notice of facts that are capable of accurate 

determination by sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned); see also City of 

Sausalito v. O’Neill, 386 F.3d 1186, 1224 n.2 (9th Cir. 2004) (“We may take judicial notice of a 

record of a state agency not subject to reasonable dispute.”). 

Case 2:18-cv-02263-MCE-AC Document 8 Filed 05/12/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided herewith. See e.g. Adler v. Gonzalez, 2015 WL 

4041772, at *1, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85909 (E.D. Cal. July 1, 2015), report and 

recommendation adopted, 2015 WL 4668668, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103386 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 

2015) (payment of fee not required if plaintiff remains indigent after release from prison), and 

cases cited therein. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Within thirty (30) days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and 

file the attached application to proceed forma pauperis used by non-prisoners in this district; 

failure to timely submit the completed application will result in a recommendation that this action 

be dismissed without prejudice. 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff, together with a copy of this order, a 

blank application to proceed forma pauperis used by non-prisoners in this district. 

DATED: May 12, 2020 

 

Case 2:18-cv-02263-MCE-AC Document 8 Filed 05/12/20 Page 2 of 2