Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965-120/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order

Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 60359)

ramittelstaedt@JonesDay.com

Patrick T. Michael (SBN 169745)

pmichael@jonesday.com

Krista S. Schwartz (SBN 303604)

ksschwartz@JonesDay.com

Joe C. Liu (SBN 237356)

jcliu@JonesDay.com

JONES DAY

555 California Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: +1.415.626.3939

Facsimile: +1.415.875.5700

Thomas W. Ritchie (pro hac vice)

twritchie@JonesDay.com

JONES DAY

77 W. Wacker Dr.

Chicago, IL 60601

Telephone: +1.312.782.3939

Facsimile: +1.312.782.8585

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SYNOPSYS, INC.

Paul Alexander (#49997)

Paul.Alexander@aporter.com

Martin R. Glick (#40187)

Marty.Glick@aporter.com

Sean M. Callagy (#255230)

Sean.Callagy@aporter.com

Willow White Noonan (#277584)

Willow.Noonan@aporter.com

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP

Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-4024

Telephone: (415) 471-3100

Facsimile: (415) 471-3400

Philip W. Marsh (#276383)

Philip.Marsh@aporter.com

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP

1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 110

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216

Telephone: (650) 798-2920

Facsimile: (650) 798-2999

Attorneys for Defendant

ATOPTECH, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ATOPTECH, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

JOINT STIPULATION OF PARTIAL 

DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 839 Filed 08/15/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order 

Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. 

(“Synopsys”) and Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”), by and through their respective 

counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Synopsys filed a Second Amended Complaint on November 25, 2013 alleging, 

inter alia, ATopTech infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348 (“the ’348 Patent”). ECF No. 43. 

Synopsys repeated those allegations in its First Supplemental Amended Complaint, filed on 

January 23, 2016. ECF No. 523. 

2. In its infringement contentions, Synopsys alleged that ATopTech infringes Claims 

1-5, 7-12, 15-19, and 22-26 of the ’348 Patent.

3. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court dismissed with prejudice Synopsys’ 

claim for infringement of Claims 15-19 of the ’348 Patent. ECF No. 763.

4. The parties agree that all of Synopsys’ claims for infringement of the remaining 

asserted claims of the ’348 Patent against ATopTech should be dismissed with prejudice as to all 

past and present products made, used, sold, offered for sale, or imported into the United States by 

ATopTech and that ATopTech’s defenses pertaining to the remaining asserted claims of the ’348 

Patent should be dismissed without prejudice.

5. The parties agree that each party will bear its own fees and costs with respect to 

Synopsys’ claims for infringement of the ’348 Patent.

Dated: August 15, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

JONES DAY

By: /s/ Patrick T. Michael

Patrick T. Michael

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SYNOPSYS, INC.

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in 

the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 839 Filed 08/15/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order 

Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

ARNOLD & PORTER

By: /s/ Philip W. Marsh

Philip W. Marsh

Attorneys for Defendant

ATOPTECH, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

IT SO ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 41(a)(2) and the Parties’ stipulation, 

that: 

1. Synopsys’ claim for infringement of Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent 

No. 6,405,348 is dismissed with prejudice.

2. ATopTech’s defenses pertaining to Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 22-26 of U.S. Patent No. 

6,405,348 are dismissed without prejudice.

3. Each party will bear its own fees and costs with respect to Synopsys’ claim for 

infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,405,348.

Dated: _________________________

By: 

Hon. Maxine Chesney 

United States District Judge 

NAI-1501963924v1

August 15, 2016

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 839 Filed 08/15/16 Page 3 of 3