Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02834/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02834-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID G. VELEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BANK OF AMERICA , N.A., et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 13-cv-02834-EDL 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS 

PERMISSION TO FILE 

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF 

Re: Dkt. No. 118 

This is a mortgage case on remand from the Ninth Circuit for the Court to reconsider a 

prior order dismissing the case in light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Yvanova v. 

New Century Mortgage Corp., 62 Cal. 4th 919 (Feb. 18, 2016). In the parties’ recent case 

management conference statement, they agreed that they previously briefed the issue of Yvanova's 

impact on the case and “agree[d] that their respective positions are set forth in the briefs 

previously filed with the Ninth Circuit.” They jointly requested that “the Court order the parties to 

simply re-file their previously submitted briefs via ECF.” In light of this agreement, the Court 

ordered the parties to file the briefs previously submitted to the Ninth Circuit with this Court. Dkt. 

No. 111. 

 All parties filed their Ninth Circuit briefs in this Court. However, Plaintiff also filed what 

appears to be a Reply brief recently filed by counsel in another case before the Ninth Circuit 

addressing Yvanova. Defendants object to Plaintiff’s unauthorized supplemental filing, and seek 

to have the supplemental brief from the other case stricken, or alternatively request an opportunity 

to respond. 

The Court will not strike Plaintiff’s unauthorized supplemental brief. Each group of 

Defendants is permitted to file a supplemental brief of no more than five pages, within one week 

Case 3:13-cv-02834-EDL Document 119 Filed 07/13/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

of the date of this Order, responding to any new arguments presented in Plaintiff’s supplemental 

filing relating to Yvanova. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 13, 2016 

 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:13-cv-02834-EDL Document 119 Filed 07/13/16 Page 2 of 2