Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01024/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01024-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MTD BRIEFING SCHEDULE

16-CV-01024 JST 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

United States Attorney

SARA WINSLOW (DCBN 457643)

Chief, Civil Division

WENDY M. GARBERS (CABN 213208)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-6475

FAX: (415) 436-7234

wendy.garbers@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES

OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY; and TRANSPORTATION 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SAI,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID SMITH, et al.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-01024-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

MTD BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Date: July 27, 2017

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

Case 3:16-cv-01024-JST Document 80 Filed 06/01/17 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MTD BRIEFING SCHEDULE

16-CV-01024 JST 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by Plaintiff and the Federal Defendants, that Plaintiff’s opposition 

to the Federal Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss shall now be due on June 16, 2017; the Federal 

Defendant’s reply will be due on June 23, 2017.

DATED: May 31, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN J. STRETCH

United States Attorney

 /s/ Wendy M. Garbers

WENDY M. GARBERS

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants UNITED 

STATES OF AMERICA; 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY; and 

TRANSPORTATION SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION

DATED: May 31, 2017 PLAINTIFF SAI

 /s/ Sai *

SAI

Plaintiff Pro Se

*In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests under penalty of perjury 

that plaintiff has concurred in the filing of this document.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR

June 1, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-01024-JST Document 80 Filed 06/01/17 Page 2 of 2