Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02043/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02043-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRELL WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-2043 JAM DAD P

vs.

JOHN HAVLIN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 12, 2012, the undersigned issued findings and

recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied. On

June 15, 2012, the assigned district judge adopted those findings and recommendations in full

and denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The time for filing dispositive motions in

this case has expired.

In due course, the court will issue a further scheduling order setting dates for

pretrial statements, pretrial conference, and jury trial. However, before issuing the scheduling

order, the court will set a mandatory settlement conference in this case. If available, the court

may order that plaintiff participate in the settlement conference by way of video-conferencing.

Pursuant to Local Rule 270(b), the parties will be directed to inform the court in writing as to

1

Case 2:10-cv-02043-JAM-DB Document 38 Filed 06/26/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

whether they wish to proceed with the settlement conference before the undersigned magistrate

judge or if they wish to be referred to the court’s mediation program. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within twenty-one days of the date of this order, each party shall inform the

court in writing as to whether they wish to proceed with the settlement conference before the

undersigned magistrate judge or if they wish to wish to be referred to the court’s mediation

program. If the parties wish to proceed before the undersigned magistrate judge, each party shall

return to the court the consent form for settlement conferences provided with this order. If the

parties do not wish the undersigned magistrate judge to preside at the settlement conference, each

party shall file a declaration stating he wishes to be referred to the court’s mediation program;

and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send each party the consent form for

settlement conferences.

DATED: June 25, 2012.

DAD:9

will2043.sc

2

Case 2:10-cv-02043-JAM-DB Document 38 Filed 06/26/12 Page 2 of 2