Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04837/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04837-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GORDON SIMPSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

OFFICER NGUYEN, OFFICER

WAYBRIGHT, OFFICER CERRUTI, SGT.

STANLEY,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-06-4837 EMC

FINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS

JURY INSTRUCTIONS

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1 – INTRODUCTION INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING

CONDUCT OF THE JURY

I will now say a few words about your conduct as jurors.

First, keep an open mind throughout the trial, and do not decide what the verdict should be

until you and your fellow jurors have completed your deliberations at the end of the case. 

Second, because you must decide this case based only on the evidence received in the case

and on my instructions as to the law that applies, you must not be exposed to any other information

about the case or to the issues it involves during the course of your jury duty. Thus, until the end of

the case or unless I tell you otherwise:

Do not communicate with anyone in any way and do not let anyone else communicate with

you in any way about the merits of the case or anything to do with it. This includes

discussing the case in person, in writing, by phone or electronic means, via e-mail, text

messaging, or any Internet chat room, blog, Web site or other feature. This applies to

communicating with your fellow jurors until I give you the case for deliberation, and it

applies to communicating with everyone else including your family members, your

employer, and the people involved in the trial, although you may notify your family and your

employer that you have been seated as a juror in the case. But, if you are asked or

approached in any way about your jury service or anything about this case, you must respond

that you have been ordered not to discuss the matter and to report the contact to the court. 

Because you will receive all the evidence and legal instruction you properly may consider to

return a verdict: do not read, watch, or listen to any news or media accounts or commentary

about the case or anything to do with it; do not do any research, such as consulting

dictionaries, searching the Internet or using other reference materials; and do not make any

investigation or in any other way try to learn about the case on your own. 

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 2 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

The law requires these restrictions to ensure the parties have a fair trial based on the same

evidence that each party has had an opportunity to address. A juror who violates these restrictions

jeopardizes the fairness of these proceedings, and a mistrial could result that would require the entire

trial process to start over. If any juror is exposed to any outside information, please notify the court

immediately.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 3 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 2 – INTRODUCTION INSTRUCTIONS – 

NO TRANSCRIPT AVAILABLE TO JURY

During deliberations, you will have to make your decision based on what you recall of the

evidence. You will not have a transcript of the trial. I urge you to pay close attention to the

testimony as it is given.

If at any time you cannot hear or see the testimony, evidence, questions or arguments, let me

know so that I can correct the problem.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 4 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 3 – INTRODUCTION INSTRUCTIONS – TAKING NOTES

If you wish, you may take notes to help you remember the evidence. If you do take notes,

please keep them to yourself until you and your fellow jurors go to the jury room to decide the case. 

Do not let note-taking distract you. When you leave, your notes should be left in the envelope in the

jury room. No one will read your notes. They will be destroyed at the conclusion of the case.

Whether or not you take notes, you should rely on your own memory of the evidence. Notes

are only to assist your memory. You should not be overly influenced by your notes or those of your

fellow jurors.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 5 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 4 – INTRODUCTION INSTRUCTIONS – BENCH

CONFERENCES AND RECESSES

From time to time during the trial, it may become necessary for me to talk with the attorneys

out of the hearing of the jury, either by having a conference at the bench when the jury is present in

the courtroom, or by calling a recess. Please understand that while you are waiting, we are working. 

The purpose of these conferences is not to keep relevant information from you, but to decide how

certain evidence is to be treated under the rules of evidence and to avoid confusion and error.

Of course, we will do what we can to keep the number and length of these conferences to a

minimum. I may not always grant an attorney’s request for a conference. Do not consider my

granting or denying a request for a conference as any indication of my opinion of the case or of what

your verdict should be.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 6 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 5 – INTRODUCTION INSTRUCTIONS – OUTLINE OF TRIAL

Trials proceed in the following way: First, each side may make an opening statement. An

opening statement is not evidence. It is simply an outline to help you understand what that party

expects the evidence will show. A party is not required to make an opening statement.

The plaintiff will then present evidence, and counsel for the defendant may cross-examine. 

Then the defendants may present evidence, and counsel for the plaintiff may cross-examine.

After the evidence has been presented, I will instruct you on the law that applies to the case

and the attorneys will make closing arguments.

After that, you will go to the jury room to deliberate on your verdict.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 7 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

8

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 6 – DUTY OF JURY (COURT READS AND PROVIDES

WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS AT END OF CASE)

Members of the Jury: Now that you have heard all of the evidence, it is my duty to instruct

you as to the law of the case.

A copy of these instructions will be sent with you to the jury room when you deliberate.

You must not infer from these instructions or from anything I may say or do as indicating

that I have an opinion regarding the evidence or what your verdict should be.

It is your duty to find the facts from all the evidence in the case. To those facts you will

apply the law as I give it to you. You must follow the law as I give it to you whether you agree with

it or not. And you must not be influenced by any personal likes or dislikes, opinions, prejudices, or

sympathy. That means that you must decide the case solely on the evidence before you. You will

recall that you took an oath to do so.

In following my instructions, you must follow all of them and not single out some and ignore

others; they are all important.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 8 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 7 – CLAIMS AND DEFENSES

To help you follow the evidence, I will give you a brief summary of the positions of the

parties:

The plaintiff, Gordon Simpson, claims that the defendant police officers, Messrs. Nguyen,

Waybright, Stanley, and Cerruti, unreasonably used excessive force in arresting him on May 16,

2004, in violation of his constitutional right to be free of seizure using excessive force. The plaintiff

has the burden of proving these claims.

The defendants deny the plaintiff’s claims. The officers contend that their use of force was

reasonable under the circumstances.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 9 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 8 – BURDEN OF PROOF – 

PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE

When a party has the burden of proof on any claim or affirmative defense by a

preponderance of the evidence, it means you must be persuaded by the evidence that the claim or

affirmative defense is more probably true than not true.

You should base your decision on all of the evidence, regardless of which party presented it.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 10 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 9 – TWO OR MORE PARTIES – 

DIFFERENT LEGAL RIGHTS

You should decide the case as to each defendant separately. Unless otherwise stated, the

instructions apply to all parties.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 11 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 10 – WHAT IS EVIDENCE

The evidence you are to consider in deciding what the facts are consists of:

1. the sworn testimony of any witness;

2. the exhibits which are received into evidence; and

3. any facts to which the lawyers have agreed.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 12 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

13

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 11 – WHAT IS NOT EVIDENCE

In reaching your verdict, you may consider only the testimony and exhibits received into

evidence. Certain things are not evidence, and you may not consider them in deciding what the facts

are. I will list them for you:

(1) Arguments and statements by lawyers are not evidence. The lawyers are not witnesses. 

What they have said in their opening statements, will say in their closing arguments, and at

other times is intended to help you interpret the evidence, but it is not evidence. If the facts

as you remember them differ from the way the lawyers have stated them, your memory of

them controls.

(2) Questions and objections by lawyers are not evidence. Attorneys have a duty to their clients

to object when they believe a question is improper under the rules of evidence. You should

not be influenced by the objection or by the court’s ruling on it.

(3) Testimony that has been excluded or stricken, or that you have been instructed to disregard,

is not evidence and must not be considered. In addition sometimes testimony and exhibits

are received only for a limited purpose; when I have given a limiting instruction, you must

follow it.

(4) Anything you may have seen or heard when the court was not in session is not evidence. 

You are to decide the case solely on the evidence received at the trial.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 13 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

14

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 12 – EVIDENCE FOR LIMITED PURPOSE

Some evidence may be admitted for a limited purpose only.

When I instruct you that an item of evidence has been admitted for a limited purpose, you

must consider it only for that limited purpose and for no other.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 14 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

15

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 13 – DIRECT AND INDIRECT EVIDENCE

Evidence may be direct or circumstantial. Direct evidence is direct proof of a fact, such as

testimony by a witness about what that witness personally saw or heard or did. Circumstantial

evidence is proof of one or more facts from which you could find another fact. You should consider

both kinds of evidence. The law makes no distinction between the weight to be given to either direct

or circumstantial evidence. It is for you to decide how much weight to give to any evidence.

By way of example, if you wake up in the morning and see that the sidewalk is wet, you may

find from that fact that it rained during the night. However, other evidence, such as a turned on

garden hose, may provide a different explanation for the presence of water on the sidewalk. 

Therefore, before you decide that a fact has been proved by circumstantial evidence, you must

consider all the evidence in the light of reason, experience, and common sense.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 15 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

16

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 14 – RULING ON OBJECTIONS

There are rules of evidence that control what can be received into evidence. When a lawyer

asks a question or offers an exhibit into evidence and a lawyer on the other side thinks that it is not

permitted by the rules of evidence, that lawyer may object. If I overrule the objection, the question

may be answered or the exhibit received. If I sustain the objection, the question cannot be answered,

and the exhibit cannot be received. Whenever I sustain an objection to a question, you must ignore

the question and must not guess what the answer might have been.

Sometimes I may order that evidence be stricken from the record and that you disregard or

ignore the evidence. That means that when you are deciding the case, you must not consider the

evidence that I told you to disregard.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 16 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

17

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 15 – CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES

In deciding the facts in this case, you may have to decide which testimony to believe and

which testimony not to believe. You may believe everything a witness says, or part of it, or none of

it. Proof of a fact does not necessarily depend on the number of witnesses who testify about it.

In considering the testimony of any witness, you may take into account:

(1) the opportunity and ability of the witness to see or hear or know the things testified to;

(2) the witness’s memory;

(3) the witness’s manner while testifying;

(4) the witness’s interest in the outcome of the case and any bias or prejudice;

(5) whether other evidence contradicted the witness’s testimony;

(6) the reasonableness of the witness’s testimony in light of all the evidence; and

(7) any other factors that bear on believability.

The weight of the evidence as to a fact does not necessarily depend on the number of

witnesses who testify about it.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 17 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

18

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 16 – STIPULATIONS OF FACT

The parties have agreed to certain facts that will be read to you. You should therefore treat

these facts as having been proved.

Sergeant Stanley and Officers Nguyen, Waybright and Cerruti were employed by the

City of Hayward at the time of the events in question (May 15-16, 2004), and acting

in that capacity.

On the morning of May 16, 2004, Officer Nguyen sprayed pepper spray (OC spray)

into the facial area of Plaintiff Simpson.

On the morning of May 16, 2004, Officers Waybright and Nguyen each struck

Plaintiff Simpson with a collapsible baton, on his left wrist and on portions of his left

leg.

On the morning of May 16, 2004, Officer Cerruti twice ordered a police service dog

to bite and restrain Plaintiff Simpson. The dog complied on both occasions, biting

Plaintiff on his left wrist and on portions of his leg.

Following the events set forth above, Plaintiff Simpson was taken to St. Rose

Hospital for medical attention.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 18 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

19

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 17 – IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE – WITNESS

The evidence that a witness has been convicted of a crime may be considered, along with all

other evidence, in deciding whether or not to believe the witness and how much weight to give to the

testimony of the witness and for no other purpose.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 19 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

20

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 18 – EXPERT OPINION

Some witnesses, because of education or experience, are permitted to state opinions and the

reasons for those opinions.

Opinion testimony should be judged just like any other testimony. You may accept it or

reject it, and give it as much weight as you think it deserves, considering the witness’s education and

experience, the reasons given for the opinion, and all the other evidence in the case.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 20 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

21

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 19 – SECTION 1983 CLAIM – 

INTRODUCTORY INSTRUCTION

At this point, I will instruct you on the nature of the claim and defenses in this case.

The plaintiff brings his claim under the federal statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which provides that

any person or persons who, under color of law, deprives another of any rights, privileges, or

immunities secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States shall be liable to the injured

party. 

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 21 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

22

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 20 – CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AT ISSUE

The federal civil rights act under which plaintiff brings this suit was enacted by Congress to

enforce the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment

to the Constitution provides that:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the

privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any

State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due

process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal

protection of the laws.

As a matter of law, under the Constitution of the United States every person has the

constitutional right not to be subjected to unreasonable force while being arrested by a law

enforcement officer, even though such arrest is otherwise made in accordance with the law.

Section 1983, the federal civil rights statute under which the plaintiff sues, provides that a

person may seek relief in this Court by way of damages against any person or persons who, under

color of any state law or custom, subjects such person to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or

immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 22 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

23

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 21 – SECTION 1983 CLAIM AGAINST OFFICER IN

INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY – ELEMENTS AND BURDEN OF PROOF

In order to prevail on his § 1983 claim against each of the officer defendants, the plaintiff

must prove each of the following elements by a preponderance of the evidence: 

1. the officer defendant acted under color of law; and

2. the acts of the officer defendant deprived the plaintiff of his particular rights under the

United States Constitution as explained in later instructions.

The parties have stipulated that each of the officer defendants acted under color of law.

If you find the plaintiff has proved each of these elements, and if you find that the plaintiff

has proved all the elements he is required to prove under Instruction No. 23, your verdict should be

for the plaintiff. If, on the other hand, the plaintiff has failed to prove any one or more of these

elements, your verdict should be for the officer defendants.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 23 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

24

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 22 – REMOVED

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 24 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

25

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 23 – PARTICULAR RIGHTS – FOURTH AMENDMENT –

UNREASONABLE SEIZURE OF PERSON – EXCESSIVE FORCE

In general, a seizure of a person is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment of the United

States Constitution if a police officer uses excessive force in making a lawful arrest. Thus, in order

to prove an unreasonable seizure in this case, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the

evidence that the officer[s] used excessive force when they subdued and then arrested the plaintiff.

Under the Fourth Amendment, a police officer may only use such force as is “objectively

reasonable” under all of the circumstances. In other words, you must judge the reasonableness of a

particular use of force from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene and not with the

20/20 vision of hindsight. 

In determining whether the officer[s] used excessive force in this case, consider all of the

circumstances known to the officer[s] on the scene, including:

1. The severity of the crime or other circumstances to which the officers were responding;

2. Whether the plaintiff posed an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or to others;

3. Whether the plaintiff was actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight;

4. The amount of time and any changing circumstances during which the officer had to 

determine the type and amount of force that appeared to be necessary;

5. The type and amount of force used.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 25 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

26

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 24 – CAUSATION

In order to establish that the acts of the defendants deprived the plaintiff of his particular

rights under the United States Constitution as explained in earlier instructions, the plaintiff must

prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the acts were so closely related to the deprivation of

the plaintiff’s rights as to be the moving force that caused the ultimate injury.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 26 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

27

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 25 – DAMAGES – PROOF

It is the duty of the Court to instruct you about the measure of damages. By instructing you

on damages, the Court does not mean to suggest for which party your verdict should be rendered.

If you find for the plaintiff on his claim against the officer defendants, you must determine

the plaintiff’s damages. The plaintiff has the burden of proving damages by a preponderance of the

evidence. Damages means the amount of money that will reasonably and fairly compensate the

plaintiff for any injury you find was caused by the defendant.

I will describe in the next instruction the types of damages you may consider.

It is for you to determine what damages, if any, have been proved.

Your award must be based upon evidence and not upon speculation, guesswork or

conjecture.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 27 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

28

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 26 – MEASURES OF TYPES OF DAMAGES

In determining the measure of damages, you should consider:

The nature and extent of the injuries;

The mental, physical, emotional pain and suffering experienced;

The reasonable value of necessary medical care, treatment, and services received to the

present time;

The reasonable value of wages, employment, and employment opportunities lost to the

present time;

The reasonable value of wages, employment, and employment opportunities which with

reasonable probability will be lost in the future.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 28 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 27 – DAMAGES – MITIGATION

The plaintiff has a duty to use reasonable efforts to mitigate damages. To mitigate means to

avoid or reduce damages.

The defendant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence:

1. that the plaintiff failed to use reasonable efforts to mitigate damages; and

2. the amount by which damages would have been mitigated.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 29 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 28 – DAMAGES ARISING IN THE FUTURE – 

DISCOUNT TO PRESENT CASH VALUE

Any award for future economic damages must be for the present cash value of those

damages.

Noneconomic damages such as pain and suffering are not reduced to present cash value.

Present cash value means the sum of money needed now, which, when invested at a

reasonable rate of return, will pay future damages at the times and in the amounts that you find the

damages will be incurred or would have been received.

The rate of return to be applied in determining present cash value should be the interest that

can reasonably be expected from safe investments that can be made by a person of ordinary

prudence, who has ordinary financial experience and skill. You should also consider decreases in

the value of money which may be caused by future inflation.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 30 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

31

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 29 – PUNITIVE DAMAGES

If you find for the plaintiff, you may, but are not required to, award punitive damages. The

purposes of punitive damages are to punish a defendant and to deter similar acts in the future. 

Punitive damages may not be awarded to compensate a plaintiff.

The plaintiff has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that punitive

damages should be awarded, and, if so, the amount of any such damages.

You may award punitive damages only if you find that the defendant’s conduct that harmed

the plaintiff was malicious, oppressive or in reckless disregard of the plaintiff’s rights. Conduct is

malicious if it is accompanied by ill will, or spite, or if it is for the purpose of injuring the plaintiff. 

Conduct is in reckless disregard of the plaintiff’s rights if, under the circumstances, it reflects

complete indifference to the plaintiff’s safety or rights, or if the defendant acts in the face of a

perceived risk that its actions will violate the plaintiff’s rights under federal law. An act or omission

is oppressive if the defendant injures or damages or otherwise violates the rights of the plaintiff with

unnecessary harshness or severity, such as by the misuse or abuse of authority or power or by the

taking advantage of some weakness or disability or misfortune of the plaintiff.

If you find that punitive damages are appropriate, you must use reason in setting the amount. 

Punitive damages, if any, should be in an amount sufficient to fulfill their purposes but should not

reflect bias, prejudice or sympathy toward any party. In considering the amount of any punitive

damages, consider the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant’s conduct. In addition, you may

consider the relationship of any award of punitive damages to any actual harm inflicted on the

plaintiff.

You may impose punitive damages against one or more of the defendants and not others, and

may award different amounts against different defendants. Punitive damages may be awarded even

if you award plaintiff only nominal, and not compensatory, damages.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 31 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

32

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 30 – NOMINAL DAMAGES

The law which applies to this case authorizes an award of nominal damages. If you find for

the plaintiff but you find that the plaintiff has failed to prove damages as defined in these

instructions, you must award nominal damages. Nominal damages may not exceed one dollar.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 32 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

33

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 31 – INTRODUCTION TO SPECIAL-VERDICT FORM

A verdict form has been prepared for you. After you have reached unanimous agreement on

a verdict, your presiding juror will fill in the form that has been given to you, sign and date it, and

advise the court that you are ready to return to the courtroom.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 33 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

34

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 32 – SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES

In the event you find any of the individual defendants violated plaintiff’s constitutional

rights, the Court is required to make additional determinations.

To assist in those determinations, the verdict form contains special interrogatories (i.e.,

questions) that the jury must answer. There must be unanimous agreement on each of the answers.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 34 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

35

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 33 – DUTY TO DELIBERATE

When you begin your deliberations, you should elect one member of the jury as your

presiding juror. That person will preside over the deliberations and speak for you here in court.

You will then discuss the case with your fellow jurors to reach agreement if you can do so. 

Your verdict must be unanimous.

Each of you must decide the case for yourself, but you should do so only after you have

considered all of the evidence, discussed it fully with the other jurors, and listened to the views of

your fellow jurors.

Do not hesitate to change your opinion if the discussion persuades you that you should. Do

not come to a decision simply because other jurors think it is right.

It is important that you attempt to reach a unanimous verdict but, of course, only if each of

you can do so after having made your own conscientious decision. Do not change an honest belief

about the weight and effect of the evidence simply to reach a verdict.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 35 of 36
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

36

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 34 – COMMUNICATION WITH COURT

If it becomes necessary during your deliberations to communicate with me, you may send a

note through the clerk, signed by your presiding juror or by one or more members of the jury. No

member of the jury should ever attempt to communicate with me except by a signed writing; I will

communicate with any member of the jury on anything concerning the case only in writing, or here

in open court. If you send out a question, I will consult with the parties before answering it, which

may take some time. You may continue your deliberations while waiting for the answer to any

question. Remember that you are not to tell anyone – including me – how the jury stands,

numerically or otherwise, until after you have reached a unanimous verdict or have been discharged. 

Do not disclose any vote count in any note to the court.

Case 3:06-cv-04837-EMC Document 177 Filed 05/13/10 Page 36 of 36