Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01625/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01625-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MADIHA MINER,

Plaintiff,

v.

PROPERTY CONCEPTS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:19-cv-01625-MCE-CKD PS

ORDER

On November 14, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. ECF No. 6. No objections were 

filed.

Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

1983). 

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations, ECF No. 6, are ADOPTED in full; 

Case 2:19-cv-01625-MCE-CKD Document 7 Filed 02/05/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. This action is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2020

Case 2:19-cv-01625-MCE-CKD Document 7 Filed 02/05/20 Page 2 of 2