Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04855/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04855-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

E-Filed 11/18/15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COURTNEY ANN SCHMIDT,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-04855-HRL 

ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENT OF 

THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

Re: Dkt. No. 6

The Clerk of Court issued a procedural order on November 17, 2015. Dkt. No. 6. The 

court now modifies the procedural requirements in this case.

Joint Statement of the Administrative Record

The parties, within 21 days of service of Defendant’s answer, shall meet and confer to 

determine whether the parties are able to file a joint statement of the administrative record. If the 

parties are able to file a joint statement, it shall be due by the same deadline as Plaintiff’s motion 

for summary judgment or for remand. The joint statement must list all facts relevant to the 

parties’ arguments, including medical evidence and testimony, in separately numbered paragraphs. 

Each fact must be supported by at least one citation to the administrative record.

Separate Statements of the Administrative Record

The parties shall file separate statements of the administrative record if they are unable to 

file a joint statement. 

Plaintiff’s Statement

Plaintiff’s separate statement would be due by the same deadline as Plaintiff’s motion for 

summary judgment or remand, and the statement would be filed separately from Plaintiff’s motion 

and memorandum of law. The statement would contain all the facts relevant to Plaintiff’s motion 

in separately numbered paragraphs, and each fact must be supported by at least one citation to the 

Case 4:15-cv-04855-DMR Document 8 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

administrative record. 

Defendant’s Statement

Defendant’s separate statement would be due by the same deadline as Defendant’s crossmotion for summary judgment or remand, and the statement would be filed separately from 

Defendant’s cross-motion and memorandum of law. Defendant’s statement would include: (a) for 

each paragraph of Plaintiff’s statement, a correspondingly numbered paragraph that states whether 

Defendant disputes Plaintiff’s factual characterizations, and with at least one citation to the 

administrative record to support any factual dispute; (b) if necessary, separately numbered 

paragraphs that state any additional facts relevant to Defendant’s cross-motion, and with at least 

one citation to the administrative record to support each additional fact.

Plaintiff’s Reply Statement

If Defendant states any additional facts to support the cross-motion, Plaintiff shall file a 

reply statement that contains, for each paragraph of additional facts in Defendant’s statement, a 

correspondingly numbered paragraph that states whether Plaintiff disputes Defendant’s factual 

characterizations. Each factual dispute shall be supported by at least one citation to the 

administrative record. This reply statement shall be filed separately from Plaintiff’s opposition 

brief and by the same deadline as the opposition brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 11/18/15

________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:15-cv-04855-DMR Document 8 Filed 11/18/15 Page 2 of 2