Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04533/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04533-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

DAVID BURKE, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No: C 06-4533 SBA 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO 

FILE A RESPONSE TO 

DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO 

EVIDENCE

 In his reply brief filed on April 6, 2010, Defendant objected to Exhibit F to the Declaration 

of Robert Powell. (Def.’s Reply at 2:11-3:25, Docket 159.) By no later than June 30, 2010, 

Plaintiff shall file a written response to Defendant’s objection. The hearing on Defendant’s motion 

for summary judgment shall be continued from June 22, 2010, to July 21, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. The 

Court, in its discretion, may resolve the motion for summary judgment, without argument. The 

parties are advised to check the Court’s website to determine whether an appearance on the motion 

is required. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 17, 2010 ____________________________ 

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:06-cv-04533-SBA Document 161 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 1