Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-02903/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-02903-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

KHALID MOHAMMAD,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE KING CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-02903-BLF 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

On October 27, 2016, this Court granted Defendant’s motion to quash and motion to 

dismiss with leave to amend, and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint on or before 

November 28, 2016. ECF 22. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed an appeal to the Ninth Circuit. ECF 23. 

On December 13, 2016, the Ninth Circuit dismissed Plaintiff’s appeal for a lack of jurisdiction. 

ECF 25. The Court subsequently extended the deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint 

to January 12, 2017. ECF 26. Because the Ninth Circuit did not issue its formal mandate until 

January 4, 2017, however, the Court further extended Plaintiff’s deadline to file an amended 

complaint to February 3, 2017. ECF 29. The Court explained that failure to file an amended 

complaint would result in dismissal. Id. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 

Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058, 1065 (9th Cir. 2004) (“The failure of the plaintiff 

eventually to respond to the court’s ultimatum . . . is properly met with the sanction of a Rule 

41(b) dismissal.”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 7, 2017

 ______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:16-cv-02903-BLF Document 30 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 1