Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01225/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01225-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Plaintiff's request for production stated, "All documents referring or relating to

paper pricing for Defendant's sticky notes."

2

 Regrettably, neither party found itself able to comply with the court's direction that

the letter briefs be limited to two pages. 

*E-filed 10/18/07*

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

3M COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MAURICE KANBAR, MK

ENTERPRISES, INC., ROLLIT, LLC, and

REX PRODUCTS, INC.

Defendants. /

Case No. C06-01225 JW (HRL)

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER ON

OCTOBER 10, 2007 DISCOVERY

ORDER

Re: Docket No. 350

In Plaintiff's motion to compel, it sought paper pricing information related to the

production of Defendants' current product, Zip Notes.1

 Defendants refused to produce such

information on the grounds of irrelevance. In ruling on this issue, the court ordered Defendants

"to produce all responsive, non-privileged paper pricing information about Zip Notes." (Docket

No. 350). 

The parties now dispute the scope of the order on the motion as it pertains to paper

pricing information. The court permitted supplemental briefing on this issue2

 and clarifies the

October 10, 2007 discovery order as follows: 

Case 5:06-cv-01225-JW Document 362 Filed 10/18/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants shall produce within 7 days of the date of this order: 

(A) any communications between themselves, as well as between any of them and actual

or potential paper suppliers which concern any of the following:

(1) the pricing of paper suitable for Zip Notes,

(2) the relationship between cost and color for Zip Notes paper;

(B) documents sufficient to show the colors and respective actual prices paid for Zip

Notes paper. 

Such information shall be produced subject to the protective order already in place. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 10/18/07 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-01225-JW Document 362 Filed 10/18/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS ORDER WILL BE ELECTRONICALLY

MAILED TO:

John Cameron Adkisson jca@fr.com, mla@fr.com 

Juanita R. Brooks brooks@fr.com, njohnson@fr.com 

Ann N. Cathcart Chaplin cathcartchaplin@fr.com, lindstedt@fr.com 

Robert Reeves Cross rcross@sideman.com, jcuago@sideman.com, ldinglasan@sideman.com,

mthomas@sideman.com 

Michael L. Gannon mgannon@mmm.com 

Michelle Lee Landry mlandry@kanbar.com 

Joel D. Leviton leviton@fr.com, lindner@fr.com 

David James Miclean miclean@fr.com, arceo@fr.com 

Kevin H. Rhodes krhodes@mmm.com 

Constance Jiun-Yee Yu cyu@sideman.com 

Counsel are responsible for transmitting this order to co-counsel who have not signed up

for e-filing.

Dated: 10/18/07 /s/ KRO 

 Chambers of Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd

Case 5:06-cv-01225-JW Document 362 Filed 10/18/07 Page 3 of 3