Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06639/USCOURTS-ca4-16-06639-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6639

ROBBIE SHERRON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TODD PINION, Region Director; DESTER GIBBS, Superintendent 

of Program’s Health Services; CINDY HAYNS, Coordinator for 

Mountain View Corr.; JENNIE SALTER, Psychologist; FRANK 

PERRY, Secretary of Public Safety, NCDPS/DAC-Prisons; DR. 

PAULA Y. SMITH, MD, Chief of Health Services, NCDPS/DAC 

Prisons; MIKE SLAGLE, Prison Unit #4855 Mountain View 

Administrator, NCDPS/DAC; NORMA MELTON, Supervisor over 

Medical Services at Mountain View Prison, NCDPS/DAC Prisons; 

KEITH C. DAMICO, PA Medical Doctor Assistant at 4855 

Mountain View Prison Unit; DEXTER GIBBS, Assistant 

Superintendent of Programs Services, etc., at 4855 Mountain 

View Corr.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney,

Chief District Judge. (1:15-cv-00181-FDW)

Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 30, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 16-6639 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/30/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Robbie Sherron, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6639 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/30/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Robbie Sherron appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without 

prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.∗ We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Sherron v. Pinion, No. 1:15-cv-00181-FDW (W.D.N.C. Mar. 

9, 2016). We deny Sherron’s motions to appoint counsel. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 ∗ We conclude that the order is “final and appealable 

because no amendment to the complaint could cure [the] 

procedural shortcoming [identified by the district court].” 

Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 624 (4th 

Cir. 2015).

Appeal: 16-6639 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/30/2016 Pg: 3 of 3