Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05245/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05245-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS MACIAS, et al., )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

)

WACKENHUT CORRECTIONS )

CORPORATION, et al., )

)

)

Defendant. )

)

)

No. CV-F-03-5245 REC/DLB

ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANTS'

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FROM OCTOBER 17, 2005 TO

MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2005 AT

1:30 P.M.

Because plaintiffs have not filed a timely opposition or

statement of non-opposition to defendants' motion for summary

judgment, the motion for summary judgment is continued from

October 17, 2005 to Monday, December 5, 2005 at 1:30 p.m.

Plaintiffs are advised that their opposition or statement of

non-opposition to the motion for summary judgment must be filed

in accordance with the requirements set forth in Rule 56-260,

Local Rules of Practice. In addition, plaintiffs opposition or

statement of non-opposition must be filed and served within the

Case 1:03-cv-05245-REC-DLB Document 143 Filed 10/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time prescribed in Rule 78-230(c), Local Rules of Practice, i.e.,

on or before Monday, November 21, 2005. Failure to comply with

these rules and this order will result in the granting of

defendants' motion for summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 6, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05245-REC-DLB Document 143 Filed 10/07/05 Page 2 of 2