Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00027/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00027-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CHARLES I. IKEKWERE,

Plaintiff,

v.

SOUTHWALL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 04-0027 JF (PVT)

ORDER DEEMING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR “ADMINISTRATIVE

RELIEF” TO BE A MOTION FOR

RELIEF FROM THE DISCOVERY

CUTOFF TO TAKE DEPOSITION,

AND MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

ON SAID MOTION, AND SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

On June 30, 2006, Defendant filed a document entitled “Motion for Administrative Relief for

an Order Permitting Southwall to Take Martha Minor’s Videotaped Deposition on or Before July 10,

2006, Due to Serious Illness.” Defendant cites no authority for failing to comply with the notice

requirements of Civil Local Rule 7-2(a) along with either a stipulation or a motion to shorten time

under Civil Local Rule 6-2 or 6-3. However, in light of the circumstances set forth in the moving

papers, the court will deem the motion to be a motion for leave from the discovery cutoff in order to

take the deposition of Martha Minor on or before July 10, 2006, and a motion to shorten time for

hearing that motion. Based on the moving papers,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to shorten time is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than 10:00 a.m. on July 7, 2006, Plaintiff shall file

any opposition to Defendant’s motion for leave from the discovery cutoff in order to take the

Case 5:04-cv-00027-JF Document 92 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

deposition of Martha Minor. Plaintiff’s opposition, if any, shall include detailed information about

Plaintiff’s counsel’s scheduling conflict. The court will rule on the motion without oral argument. 

Although this briefing schedule is short, Plaintiff was sent notice of the motion through the court’s

ECF system on June 30, 2006, and the issue presented is not complex.

Dated: 7/5/06

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:04-cv-00027-JF Document 92 Filed 07/05/06 Page 2 of 2