Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02368/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02368-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Jay L. Sellers,

 

 Plaintiff,

v.

City of Davis Police

Department, et al.

 

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 07-2368 LEW (GGH) 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO VACATE

On March 25, 2008, Plaintiff filed a Motion to

Vacate the Judgment entered by the Court on March 3,

2008. The Court hereby takes the matter under

submission without opposition.

 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) permits

relief from a final judgment or order for the following

reasons: “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or

excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which

by due diligence could not have been discovered in time

Case 2:07-cv-02368-JAM-GGH Document 25 Filed 10/02/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud . .

., misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse

party; (4) the judgment is void; . . . or (6) any other

reason justifying relief from the operation of the

judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). 

Plaintiff provides no new evidence or argument

which would alter this Court’s decision to adopt the

report and recommendation of the magistrate judge. The

Court, having reviewed Plaintiff’s motion and the

applicable legal standards hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s

motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

 HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW

Senior, U.S. District Court Judge

DATE: October 1, 2008

Case 2:07-cv-02368-JAM-GGH Document 25 Filed 10/02/08 Page 2 of 2