Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01185/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01185-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 751
Nature of Suit: Labor - Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

HOLDEN LAW

GROUP 

1522 LINCOLN WAY

AUBURN, CA 95603 

530.888.0901

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY 1 Case 2:14-CV-01185-WBS-EFB 

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

ANTHONY C. OCEGUERA, State Bar No. 259117

HOLDEN LAW GROUP 

1522 Lincoln Way 

Auburn, CA 95603-5015 

anthony@holdenlawgroup.com 

Telephone: 530.888.0901 

Facsimile: 530.888.0902 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CHILDREN’S RECEIVING HOME 

OF SACRAMENTO 

Robin K. Perkins, SBN: 131252 

Natalia D. Asbill, SBN: 281860 

PERKINS & ASSOCIATES 

300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: 916.446.2000 

Facsimile: 916.447.6400 

rperkins@perkins-lawoffice.com

nasbill@perkins-lawoffice.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TINA CANUPP 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TINA CANUPP 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CHILDREN’S RECEIVING HOME OF 

SACRAMENTO; and DOES 1 to 25, 

inclusive 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:14-CV-01185-WBS-EFB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY 

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

 This stipulation is made by and between Defendant Children’s Receiving Home of Sacramento 

(“Defendant”), through its counsel Anthony Oceguera, and Plaintiff Tina Canupp (“Plaintiff”), through 

her counsel Natalia D. Asbill, in light of the following facts: 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:14-cv-01185-WBS-EFB Document 16 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

HOLDEN LAW

GROUP 

1522 LINCOLN WAY

AUBURN, CA 95603 

530.888.0901

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY 2 Case 2:14-CV-01185-WBS-EFB 

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

RECITALS

 WHEREAS, this Court entered its Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order on September 11, 2014, 

Docket No. 10; 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Pretrial Scheduling Order was modified on 

August 27, 2015, extending the discovery deadlines through December 30, 2015, the dispositive motion 

filing deadline through February 29, 2016, the final pretrial conference to April 25, 2015, and the trial 

date to June 28, 2016 (see Stipulation and Order to Modify Pretrial Scheduling Order, Docket No. 14); 

 WHEREAS, both parties have completed a number of percipient witness depositions; 

 WHEREAS, plaintiff has noticed the depositions of several current employees of Defendant, 

and has or is attempting to serve deposition subpoenas on former employees, and the parties are 

meeting and conferring regarding the scheduling of these depositions and are having difficulties 

completing these deposition due to the holidays and the unavailability of witnesses; 

 WHEREAS, delays in obtaining medical records from a few of plaintiff’s treating doctors’ have 

prevented Defendant from taking those doctors’ depositions, and has further prevented Defendant 

from completing Plaintiff’s continued deposition; 

 WHEREAS, the parties are currently engaging in meaningful settlement negotiations (e.g., 

Defendant issued an offer of compromise and plaintiff recently issued a settlement demand), but need 

additional time to determine whether a settlement can be reached in this case; 

 WHEREAS, the parties desire to minimize expenditure of resources and reserve available 

moneys to settle their disputes rather than incur costs on discovery at this time; 

 WHEREAS, the parties have previously only obtained and/or requested a modification of the 

Court’s Scheduling Order one time, and at that time requested a brief extension of pertinent dates; 

 WHEREAS, the parties agree that it would be in their collective best interests to extend the 

current deadlines in the Order as follows: 

 1. The deadlines to complete discovery and file any discovery-related motions should be 

extended through January 31, 2016; 

 2. All other deadlines will remain as modified in Order to Modify Pretrial Scheduling 

Order, Docket No. 14. 

Case 2:14-cv-01185-WBS-EFB Document 16 Filed 12/14/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

HOLDEN LAW

GROUP 

1522 LINCOLN WAY

AUBURN, CA 95603 

530.888.0901

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY 3 Case 2:14-CV-01185-WBS-EFB 

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

Dated: December 14, 2015 HOLDEN LAW GROUP 

 

By: Anthony Oceguera /s/ 

ANTHONY C. OCEGUERA 

Attorneys for Defendant CHILDREN’S 

RECEIVING HOME OF SACRAMENTO 

Dated: December 14, 2015 PERKINS & ASSOCIATES 

 

By: Natalia Asbill /s/ 

NATALIA D. ASBILL 

Attorney for Plaintiff TINA CANUPP 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, THE 

COURT AMENDS THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The deadlines to complete discovery and file any discovery-related motions are extended 

to January 31, 2016.

 2. All other deadlines will remain as modified in Order to Modify Pretrial Scheduling 

Order, Docket No. 14. 

 

Dated: December 14, 2015 

 

Case 2:14-cv-01185-WBS-EFB Document 16 Filed 12/14/15 Page 3 of 3