Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01334/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01334-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY P. BARNES, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

THE HERSHEY COMPANY,

Defendant. /

No. 3:12-cv-01334-CRB

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

REQUEST TO FILE A SURREPLY BY

DECEMBER 9, 2015

Plaintiffs have objected to declarations that Defendant filed in connection with its

reply in support of Defendant’s summary judgment motions. See Objections (dkt. 321). 

Plaintiffs argue that they should be given a chance to respond to any new evidence

introduced. See Provenz v. Miller, 102 F.3d 1478, 1483 (9th Cir. 1996); Miller v. Glenn

Miller Productions, Inc., 454 F.3d 975, 979 n.1 (9th Cir. 2006). For good cause shown, the

Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs submit a surreply that is (1) confined in scope to any new

evidence submitted by Defendant, (2) no longer than 10 pages in length, and (3) filed no later

than Wednesday, December 9, 2015. The Court further orders that the December 11, 2015

hearing on the summary judgment motions be VACATED and reset for December 18, 2015.

IT SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 2, 2015 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:12-cv-01334-CRB Document 322 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 1