Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06336/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06336-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALTON E. FITZGERALD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06336-AWI-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS,

AND DISMISSING ACTION, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO

EXHAUST (Docs. 32 and 37)

Plaintiff Alton E. Fitzgerald (“plaintiff”), a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this

civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On October 16, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. 

To date, the parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:04-cv-06336-AWI-LJO Document 38 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 16,

2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion, filed June

12, 2006, is GRANTED; and,

3. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on

plaintiff’s failure to exhaust the available administrative

remedies.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06336-AWI-LJO Document 38 Filed 01/11/07 Page 2 of 2