Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00407/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00407-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT APPLICATION FOR INITIAL FOUR-WEEK EXTENSION OF SUMMARY-JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE Page 1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194

Assistant U. S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2760

Attorneys for Federal Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAHOE TAVERN PROPERTY

OWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,

et al.,

Defendants.

CIV. S-06-407 LKK/GGH

JOINT APPLICATION FOR INITIAL

FOUR-WEEK EXTENSION OF

SUMMARY-JUDGMENT BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

Date: January 12, 2007

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

Defendants, with plaintiffs' concurrence, for the reasons stated in the Counsel

Declaration submitted herewith, apply to the Court for a four-week extension of the briefing

schedule set in the Minutes filed May 22, 2006, and of the date concerning project

implementation in the Stipulation and Order Concerning Project Implementation filed June

27, 2006, as detailed below. No previous extension of these times has been sought or granted.

1. That the date for filing cross-motions for summary judgment, currently October 22,

2006 (actually Monday, October 23, 2006), be extended by four weeks to November 20, 2006.

2. That the date for filing oppositions, currently November 22, 2006, be extended by

four weeks to December 20, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00407-LKK -GGH Document 30 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT APPLICATION FOR INITIAL FOUR-WEEK EXTENSION OF SUMMARY-JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE Page 2

3. That the date for filing replies, currently December 7, 2006, be extended by four

weeks plus the Christmas holiday week to January 11, 2007.

4. That the hearing date, currently January 12, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., be continued until

a date and time to be set by the Court. Four weeks after the currently-set January 12 date is

February 9, 2007. Because of Mr. Rossmann's planned vacation from February 17 to 27,

2007, the parties request that the date be set during the week of February 5 to 9.

5. That the date of January 12, 2007, in paragraphs 2 through 5 of the Stipulation and

Order Concerning Project Implementation, filed June 27, 2006, be amended to be the date set

in response to paragraph 4, above.

Dated: October 11, 2006 ROSSMANN AND MOORE, LLP

By: /s/ Roger B. Moore 

ROGER B. MOORE

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: October 11, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF 

RICHARD L. CRABTREE

By: /s/ Richard L. Crabtree 

RICHARD L. CRABTREE

Attorneys for Defendant

County of Placer

Dated: October 11, 2006 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Y H T Himel 

YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL

Assistant U. S. Attorney

Attorneys for Federal Defendants

ORDER

The Court has received the parties' stipulation and proposed order and a counsel

declaration in support of a four-week extension of the briefing and hearing schedule for crossmotions for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, it is ORDERED as follows:

Case 2:06-cv-00407-LKK -GGH Document 30 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT APPLICATION FOR INITIAL FOUR-WEEK EXTENSION OF SUMMARY-JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE Page 3

1. Cross-motions for summary judgment shall be filed by November 20, 2006.

2. Oppositions shall be filed by December 20, 2006.

3. Replies shall be filed by January 11, 2007.

4. The hearing shall be held March 2, 2007, at 10:00 a.m.

5. The date of January 12, 2007, in paragraphs 2 through 5 of the Stipulation and

Order Concerning Project Implementation, filed June 27, 2006, is AMENDED to be the same

date as that set in paragraph 4, above.

It is APPROVED and SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 12, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00407-LKK -GGH Document 30 Filed 10/13/06 Page 3 of 3