Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01163/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01163-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

-1- CASE NO. CV 09-01163 MMC 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING DATES FOR MOTION FOR JUDGMENT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SF/1656964v1

Scott Kalkin 120791 

ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN 

A Professional Law Corporation 

369 Pine Street, Suite 610 

San Francisco, California 94104 

(415) 732-0282 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

The parties in the above-captioned matter, through their respective attorneys of record, 

enter into the following stipulation and request the Court to enter an order accordingly: 

1. At the case management conference on June 26, 2009, the Court ordered the 

parties to follow the briefing schedule set forth below in this ERISA governed denial of longterm disability benefits case: 

Plaintiff to file motion for judgment January 15, 2010 

Defendant to file motion for judgment 

and opposition to plaintiff’s motion February 12, 2010 

Plaintiff’s opposition and reply February 26, 2010 

Defendant’s Reply March 12, 2010 

Hearing date April 2, 2010 

PENNY BENDER, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY as Administrator and Fiduciary 

of the Bertelsmann, Inc., Employee 

Protection Plan Number 503; THE 

BERTELSMANN, INC., EMPLOYEE 

PROTECTION PLAN NUMBER 503, 

Defendants.

 CASE NO. CV 09-01163 MMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RESETTING DATES FOR 

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT 

Case 3:09-cv-01163-MMC Document 22 Filed 01/14/10 Page 1 of 3
 -2- CASE NO. CV 09-01163 MMC 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING DATES FOR MOTION FOR JUDGMENT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SF/1656964v1

2. On January 12, 2010, plaintiff’s counsel Scott Kalkin called defense counsel 

Dennis Rolstad in order to inform him that he would be having surgery on his right shoulder on 

January 21, 2010, and to request his consent to continue the briefing schedule and hearing date in 

order to accommodate this medical problem. The parties thereafter agreed to continue the 

briefing schedule and assert that good cause for the continuance exists due to plaintiff counsel’s 

medical problem and planned surgery. 

3. In light of the foregoing, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court 

enter an order changing the briefing schedule and hearing date as set forth below. Each of the 

dates set by the Court are proposed to be continued for six weeks. 

Plaintiff to file motion for judgment February 26, 2010 

Defendant to file cross-motion for judgment 

and opposition to plaintiff’s motion March 26, 2010 

Plaintiff to file opposition and reply April 9, 2010 

Defendant to file reply April 23, 2010 

Hearing date May 14, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. 

4. The parties further stipulate and agree that the discovery cut-off in this matter has 

passed, and that discovery in this matter shall remain closed. 

Respectfully submitted, 

ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN 

Dated: January 12, 2010 By: s/Scott Kalkin 

Scott Kalkin 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD, LLP 

Dated: January 12, 2010 By: s/Dennis G. Rolstad 

Dennis G. Rolstad

Attorneys for Defendant Hartford 

Life and Accident Insurance Company 

Case 3:09-cv-01163-MMC Document 22 Filed 01/14/10 Page 2 of 3
 -3- CASE NO. CV 09-01163 MMC 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING DATES FOR MOTION FOR JUDGMENT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SF/1656964v1

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: By: 

Judge of the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of California 

January 14, 2010

, and the deadlines set at the June 26, 2009 Case Management

Conference are hereby EXTENDED as set forth in the parties' stipulation.

Case 3:09-cv-01163-MMC Document 22 Filed 01/14/10 Page 3 of 3