Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01839/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01839-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES FOR FILING OF ADR CERTIFICATION

AND SELECTION OF ADR PROCESS — CASE NO. 3:06-CV-01839 CRB 1

pa-1077637

KARL J. KRAMER (CA SBN 136433)

Email: KKramer@mofo.com

ROBERT L. McKAGUE (CA SBN 187461)

Email: RMcKague@mofo.com

ERIKA L. LABIT (CA SBN 234919)

Email: ELabit@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018

Telephone: (650) 813-5600

Facsimile: (650) 494-0792

Attorneys for Defendant

SYNAPTICS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ELANTECH DEVICES CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

SYNAPTICS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:06-CV-01839 CRB

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING DEADLINES FOR 

FILING OF ADR 

CERTIFICATION AND 

SELECTION OF ADR PROCESS

Having reviewed the Stipulation To Continue Deadlines For Filing Of ADR Certification 

And Selection Of ADR Process submitted by plaintiff Elantech Devices Corporation (“Elantech”) 

and defendant Synaptics, Inc. (“Synaptics”), and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines for Elantech and Synaptics to (1) file the 

ADR Certification required by ADR Local Rule 3-5(b) and (2) file a Stipulation and [Proposed] 

Order Selecting ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference required by ADR 

Local Rule 3-5(c) are continued until July 19, 2006.

Dated: ______________, 2006

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

U.S. District Court Judge

July 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 5:06-cv-01839-PVT Document 27 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 1