Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01507/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01507-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

50943/183638.2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME

CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

 David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758) 

 Albert P. Bedecarré (Bar No. 148178) 

 Diane M. Doolittle (Bar No. 142046) 

 Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927) 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Email: davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com 

 albedecarre@quinnemanuel.com 

 dianedoolittle@quinnemanuel.com 

 carlanderson@quinnemanuel.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Siliconix incorporated 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS AND COUNTERCLAIMANTS IDENTIFIED ON 

SIGNATURE PAGE PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-4. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SILICONIX INCORPORATED, a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DENSO CORPORATION, a Japanese 

corporation, and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC., a 

Michigan corporation, 

Defendants. 

AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS 

NOS. C 04-00344 WHA AND 

C 05-03617 WHA. 

 CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING SILICONIX'S TIME 

TO AMEND ITS PATENT LOCAL RULE 

3-1 DISCLOSURE IN RESPONSE TO THE 

COURT'S FEBRUARY 15, 2006 ORDER 

RE DISPUTE OVER DISCLOSURE 

UNDER LOCAL PATENT RULES 

Judge: The Honorable William H. Alsup 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 72 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

50943/1836368.2 -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME

CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS

STIPULATION

WHEREAS: 

A. The Court's February 15, 2006 Order Re Dispute Over Disclosure Under Local 

Patent Rules (the "February 15 Order") provides that Plaintiff Siliconix incorporated ("Siliconix") 

shall have seven calendar days within which to amend Siliconix's Patent Local Rule 3-1 

Disclosure in response to the February 15 Order. 

B. Siliconix is reviewing this Court's prior claim construction ruling and prior 

positions taken by defendants in other actions involving U.S. Patent No. 5,034,785 in an attempt 

to determine in good faith whether and to what extent Siliconix should amend its Patent Local 

Rule 3-1 Disclosure in response to the Court's February 15 Order. 

C. Given the large amount of information to be reviewed and analyzed, Siliconix has 

requested that defendants in this action and in the consolidated actions, Defendants DENSO 

CORPORATION, TD SCAN (U.S.A.), Inc., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Panasonic 

Corporation of North America, and Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc. (collectively 

"Defendants"), agree to a two week extension of time for Siliconix to amend its Patent Local Rule 

3-1 Disclosure and Defendants have agreed to such an extension. 

D. The requested extension will not affect any other event or deadline already fixed by 

Court order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Siliconix and Defendants, 

through their respective counsel of record, that Siliconix shall have a two week extension of time, 

through and including March 8, 2006, to amend Siliconix's Patent Local Rule 3-1 Disclosure in 

response to the Court's February 15 Order. 

DATED: February 21, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

 By /s/ David Eiseman 

 David Eiseman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Siliconix incorporated 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 72 Filed 02/22/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

50943/1836368.2 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME

CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS

DATED: February 21, 2006 KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP 

 By /s/ Nick Saros 

 Nick Saros 

Attorneys for Defendants DENSO 

CORPORATION and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), Inc. 

DATED: February 21, 2006 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

 By /s/ Peter Chen 

 Peter P. Chen 

Attorneys for Defendants Matsushita Electric 

Industrial Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Corporation of 

North America 

DATED: February 21, 2006 DECHERT LLP 

 By /s/ Chris Scott Graham 

 Chris Scott Graham 

Attorneys for Defendant Advanced Analogic 

Technologies, Inc. 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 72 Filed 02/22/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

50943/1836368.2 -3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME

CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 22_, 2006 

 

 The Honorable William H. Alsup 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 72 Filed 02/22/06 Page 4 of 4