Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00130/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00130-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT (PROPOSED) FORM OF ORDER AND ORDER 

GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME; Case No. 1:12-CV-00130-LJO-DLB

ROBERT J. ROSATI, No. 112006

robert@erisalg.com

THORNTON DAVIDSON, No. 166487

thornton@erisalg.com

ERISA Law Group LLP

6485 Palm Avenue, Suite 105

Fresno, California 93704

Telephone: 559-478-4119

Telefax: 559-478-5939

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

WILLIAM BARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION

WILLIAM BARNETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 

EDISON COMPANY LONG TERM 

DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:12-CV-00130-LJO-DLB 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO FILE JOINT (PROPOSED) 

FORM OF ORDER AND ORDER 

GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

A Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Attorney’s Fees, Benefits and Interest was filed by the Court for the above-captioned 

matter on July 5, 2016. Within that decision, the Court ordered the parties to submit 

to the court, by not later than July 27, 2016, a joint proposed form of order. The 

parties are currently trying to resolve the case in its entirety and, if necessary agree 

upon the language to be contained in the joint proposed order and request a 14-day 

extension to do so.

///

///

Case 1:12-cv-00130-LJO-SAB Document 95 Filed 07/27/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT (PROPOSED) FORM OF ORDER AND ORDER 

GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME; Case No. 1:12-CV-00130-LJO-DLB

2

No extension of time has been previously requested. No parties are prejudiced 

through an extension of time.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: July 27, 2016 ERISA LAW GROUP, LLP

/s/ Robert J. Rosati

THORTON DAVIDSON

Attorney for Plaintiff,

WILLIAM BARNETT

Attorneys for Plaintiff WILLIAM BARNETT

Dated: July 27, 2016 LITTLER MENDELSON

By: /s/ Keith A. Jacoby

KEITH A. JACOBY

DEMERY RYAN

Attorneys for Defendant 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 

LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, it is ordered as 

follows:

1. A 14-day extension to submit the joint proposed order is granted. The new deadline 

to file the report is August 10, 2016.

2. If the parties cannot settle the issues, they shall submit a joint status report on or 

before August 10, 2016, laying out their positions and proposals for further proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00130-LJO-SAB Document 95 Filed 07/27/16 Page 2 of 2