Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02850/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02850-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONDALEE MORRIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

G. MODHADDAM, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2: 18-cv-2850 MCE KJN P

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 9, 2019, the undersigned issued an order screening the 

second amended complaint. (ECF No. 21.) The undersigned found that the second amended 

complaint stated potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against defendants 

Modhaddam, Bishop and Tesluk based on their alleged denial of plaintiff’s requests to adjust his 

glaucoma medications to alleviate the side effects of headaches, eye pain, nausea and blurred 

vision. The undersigned dismissed the remaining claims and defendants with thirty days to file a

third amended complaint. 

On September 27, 2019, plaintiff filed objections to the September 9, 2019 order. (ECF 

No. 23.) On September 30, 2019, plaintiff filed a petition for rehearing of the September 9, 2019 

order. (ECF No. 24.) In his September 27, 2019 and September 30, 2019 pleadings, plaintiff 

objected to findings made by the undersigned in the September 9, 2019 order. 

Case 2:18-cv-02850-MCE-KJN Document 29 Filed 03/10/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On October 2, 2019, plaintiff filed a notice to proceed on those claims found potentially 

cognizable by the undersigned in the September 9, 2019 order. (ECF No. 25.) On January 6, 

2020, plaintiff filed a status request. (ECF No. 26.) In this request, plaintiff states that he agreed 

to proceed on those claims found potentially cognizable in the September 9, 2019 order.

Based on plaintiff’s representations in his October 2, 2019 and January 6, 2020 pleadings, 

the undersigned finds that plaintiff has withdrawn his objections to the September 9, 2019 order 

made in his September 27, 2019 and September 30, 2019 pleadings. Accordingly, the 

undersigned separately orders service of the second amended complaint as to those claims found 

potentially cognizable in the September 9, 2019 order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDER that plaintiff’s objections to the September 9, 2019 

order contained in his September 27, 2019 objections and September 30, 2019 petition for 

rehearing are deemed withdrawn.

Dated: March 9, 2020

Morr2850.obj

Case 2:18-cv-02850-MCE-KJN Document 29 Filed 03/10/20 Page 2 of 2