Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00941/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00941-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAIYEZ AHMED,

 Plaintiff,

v.

M. MARTEL, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-00941-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

(ECF No. 17)

AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE WITHIN 

THIRTY (30) DAYS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States 

District Court for the Eastern District of California. 

On August 26, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued revised Findings and 

Recommendations recommending that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted. (ECF 

No. 29.) Defendants have filed objections. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff was granted leave to 

file objections on or before October 21, 2015. That deadline has passed, and Plaintiff 

has not filed his objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has 

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the revised findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 

and by proper analysis. 

Case 1:13-cv-00941-DAD-MJS Document 33 Filed 10/22/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court adopts the revised findings and recommendations, filed on 

August 26, 2015 (ECF No. 29), in full; 

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED; 

3. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the 

date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 22, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00941-DAD-MJS Document 33 Filed 10/22/15 Page 2 of 2