Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-3_12-cv-00653/USCOURTS-almd-3_12-cv-00653-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ZEBEDEE HAYES, #119920, )

)

Petitioner, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:12-cv-0653-TMH

) WO

CARTER F. DAVENPORT, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

O R D E R

After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE

of the court that:

1. The petitioner's objection (Doc. #7) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on September 10, 2012 is overruled;

2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4) filed on August 13, 2012

is adopted;

3. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Zebedee Hayes on

July 23, 2012 is DENIED.

4. This cause of action is DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(b)(3)(A) as Hayes has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit

Case 3:12-cv-00653-TMH-CSC Document 8 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 2
Court of Appeals authorizing this Court to consider his successive habeas application.

1

DONE this the 14th day of September, 2012.

/s/ Truman M. Hobbs

TRUMAN M. HOBBS

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 The court notes that any habeas claims the petitioner seeks to present are likewise 1

subject to the one-year period of limitation contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Moreover, the

court finds that there are no circumstances present in this case which “entitle [Hayes] in the

interest of justice to transfer [pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631] or stay ... because the limitations

period had already expired before he filed” the instant habeas action. Guenther v. Holt, 173 F.3d

1328, 1330-1331 (11th Cir. 1999).

2

Case 3:12-cv-00653-TMH-CSC Document 8 Filed 09/14/12 Page 2 of 2