Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01224/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01224-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

Case No.: 15-cv-01224 NC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROY A. DAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE INC., and LARRY PAGE,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-01224 NC 

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF ROY A. 

DAY’S EMAILS TO COURT AND 

REQUESTING PLAINTIFF TO 

CEASE IMPROPER SUBMISSIONS 

TO COURT

On April 6, 2015, this Court dismissed plaintiff Roy A. Day’s complaint without 

leave to amend, finding that the federal court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider 

his frivolous complaint about Google’s technical support for a Google Nexus 9 tablet. 

Dkt. No. 8. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, after finding Day’s appeal to be frivolous, 

dismissed it for his failure to pay the docketing/filing fee. Dkt. Nos. 15, 17. To 

summarize: the complaint and appeal have been dismissed and this case is closed.

The Court has received two emails from Mr. Day since his case was dismissed. The 

emails are dated June 26 and June 30, 2015. The clerk of court will file the emails in this 

case to preserve the record. The emails attach images of notices Mr. Day received from 

the clerk’s office for this Court advising “NOTICE OF PAYMENT DUE” for the filing 

fees of his lawsuit and appeal. Given that the case has now been terminated, additional 

notices are not anticipated.

/

Case 5:15-cv-01224-NC Document 19 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 15-cv-01224 NC 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Mr. Day’s emails insist that he needs a reply, and given that he is representing 

himself, the Court responds as follows. Requests for a court order must be made by a 

written motion filed through the clerk’s office. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b); N.D. Cal. Local Rule 

7-1. The Court does not rule on requests made by email, especially emails about closed 

cases.

As this case is closed and the appeal is dismissed, the Court orders that Mr. Day 

cease emailing the Court about this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 7, 2015 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:15-cv-01224-NC Document 19 Filed 07/07/15 Page 2 of 2