Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06770/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06770-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM PLUMMER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

WARDEN EDWARD CADEN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F 04-6770 AWI DLB P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AS MOOT

(Documents #3, #4, #5, #7, #8 & #9)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

On September 13, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations that

recommended the court deny Plaintiff’s pending motions, which request injunctive relief,

because these motions are premature. The Findings and Recommendations gave notice to the

parties that any objections could be filed within ten (10) days. No party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

(9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the Findings and

Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Case 1:04-cv-06770-AWI-DLB Document 30 Filed 09/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 13, 2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Plaintiff’s motions filed January 20, 2005, January 24, 2005, February 7, 2005, and

February 9, 2005 are DENIED; and

3. This action is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 28, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06770-AWI-DLB Document 30 Filed 09/30/05 Page 2 of 2