Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03466/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03466-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

[Proposed] Order. 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

S. R. Mitchell (SBN 172664) 

The Making a New Reality, Inc 

1300 Clay Street Suite 600 

Oakland, CA 94612 

510.836.2097 (ph) 

510.380.6431 (fax) 

raye@ichope2.com

Attorney for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THE MITCHELL LAW GROUP, a 

California Professional Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

OCC VENTURE LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company, Shorenstein Reality 

Services, a California Corporation, and Bell 

Rosenberg and Hughes, LLP, a California 

limited liability partnership; Does 1-10. 

 Defendants. 

Civil Case No.: C09-03466 MMC ADR 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GRANTING PLAINTIFF THE 

MITCHELL LAW GROUP’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.

Date: April 2, 2010 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Dept.: Courtroom 7 

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

OCC VENTURE LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company, 

 Counterclaimant. 

 vs. 

THE MITCHELL LAW GROUP, a California 

professional corporation; and Roes 1-10. 

 Counterdefendants.

;

DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF

Case 3:09-cv-03466-MMC Document 52 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

[Proposed] Order. 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Haven considered Plaintiff The Mitchell Law Group, APC’s Motion for Leave to File 

Second Amended Complaint, and having found good cause, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended 

Complaint is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Proposed Second Amended Complaint attached to 

Plaintiff’s motion is DEEMED FILED. 

Date: _____________________ ______________________________ 

 Judge Maxine M. Chesney 

and no opposition having been filed,

Plaintiff shall file the Second Amended Complaint no

later than April 2, 2010.

March 23, 2010

The April 2, 2010 hearing is VACATED.

Case 3:09-cv-03466-MMC Document 52 Filed 03/23/10 Page 2 of 2