Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-02855/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-02855-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALANY JEAN HELMANTOLER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF CONCORD, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-02855-HSG 

ORDER

Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Statement of Remaining Claims (Dkt. No. 50), the 

Court advises that it will not continue or vacate the currently-scheduled June 29, 2015 trial date, or 

certify any issue for immediate appeal. The Court’s order granting in part and denying in part 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment may not be appealed on an interlocutory basis. 

Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 335 (9th Cir. 1990) (order dismissing § 1983 claim 

on immunity grounds may be fully and effectively reviewed after final judgment and accordingly

does not fall under the collateral order doctrine); see also Baird v. Palmer, 114 F.3d 39, 43 (4th 

Cir. 1997) (holding that “the collateral order doctrine does not confer appellate jurisdiction over an 

order dismissing claims against a defendant on the basis of qualified immunity, where other claims 

remain pending in the district court”) (collecting cases). The parties should come to the June 16, 

2015 pretrial conference prepared to discuss all remaining trial issues. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

6/15/2015

Case 4:14-cv-02855-HSG Document 51 Filed 06/15/15 Page 1 of 1