Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY BOWOTO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CHEVRON CORP., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 99-02506 SI

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO FILE A

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL EXPERT

DISCOVERY

On February 7, 2006, defendants filed a letter brief seeking to compel two of plaintiffs’ experts

to produce email correspondence regarding the subject matter of their expert testimony. Plaintiffs

promptly responded, requesting that the Court deny the motion as untimely or, in the alternative, grant

them an extension to file their response until after the Court hears two motions in limine concerning the

admissibility of the expert testimony.

Having considered the matter and for good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS plaintiffs’

request for an extension (Docket No. 965). Plaintiffs may have until March 17, 2006, to file their

response to defendants’ letter brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 17, 2006

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1054 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1054 Filed 02/22/06 Page 2 of 2