Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07694/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07694-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C06 07694 JW 

404360.01 

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

ELLIOT R. PETERS - #158708 

R. JAMES SLAUGHTER - #192813 

BENJAMIN B. AU - #237854 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

epeters@kvn.com

rslaughter@kvn.com

bau@kvn.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

GEORGE SAMENUK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

LARRY McINTOSH; YANGJIE CHENG; 

PING CHEN; STEVE HAEFFELE; LEBIN 

CHENG; VATSAL SONECHA; and 

JONATHAN WONG; individually and on 

behalf of all those similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

McAFEE, INC.; GEORGE SAMENUK; 

DALE FULLER; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 

Case No. C06 07694 JW 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Dept: 8 

Judge: Honorable James Ware 

Date Comp. Filed: December 15, 2006 

Trial Date: None set. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

10/18/2007

Case 5:06-cv-07694-JW Document 49 Filed 10/18/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C06 07694 JW 

404360.01 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 of the Northern District of California, it is hereby stipulated 

and agreed by Plaintiffs and defendant George Samenuk, by and through their attorneys, as 

follows: 

WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendant George Samenuk had previously stipulated that Mr. 

Samenuk would have up to and through November 5, 2007, within which to file a response to the 

Complaint in the above-captioned matter; 

WHEREAS the Court issued its Order on September 28, 2007 dismissed with prejudice 

Plaintiff’s Third and Fourth Causes of Action for Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation, 

respectively; dismissed with leave to amend Plaintiffs’ Second and Fifth Causes of Action for 

Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing and Unjust Enrichment; dismissed with 

prejudice all causes of action against Defendant Dale Fuller, and denied Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Cause of Action; 

WHEREAS the Court ordered Plaintiffs to file an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) 

days from the date of the Order; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Defendant George Samenuk shall have up to and 

through sixty (60) days following Plaintiff’s filing of its Amended Complaint to file a response 

to the Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter. Defendant George Samenuk shall not 

be obligated to reply to the Complaint that Plaintiffs filed on December 15, 2006. 

Dated: October 16, 2007 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ Benjamin B. Au 

Benjamin B. Au 

Attorneys for Defendant 

GEORGE SAMENUK 

Case 5:06-cv-07694-JW Document 49 Filed 10/18/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C06 07694 JW 

404360.01 

Dated: October 16, 2007 COTCHETT, PITRE, & MCCARTHY 

By: /s/ Mark C. Molumphy 

Mark C. Molumphy 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

I, Benjamin B. Au, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. In compliance with 

General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Mark C. Molumphy has concurred in this filing. 

Case 5:06-cv-07694-JW Document 49 Filed 10/18/07 Page 3 of 3