Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04656/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04656-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA1 60136303.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITATION ON REPLY

Case No. C 05-4656 PJH

Robert F. Hinton, Bar No. 98110 

RFHinton@rkmc.com 

David Martinez, Bar No. 193183 

DMartinez@rkmc.com 

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 

2049 Century Park East, Suite 3700 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3211 

Telephone: 310-552-0130 

Facsimile: 310-229-5800 

Attorneys for Defendants 

BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC. and 

BEST BUY CO., INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IDENTITY ARTS, a California Limited 

Liability Company, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, 

INC., a Minnesota Corporation, BEST 

BUY CO., INC., a Minnesota Corporation 

and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 05-4656 PJH 

 related to 

Case No. C 06-1631 PJH 

[Assigned For All Purposes To The Honorable 

Phyllis J. Hamilton] 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

EXTEND PAGE LIMITATION ON REPLY 

Date: November 29, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 3 

 WHEREAS, Defendants Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and Best Buy Co., Inc. 

(collectively, “Best Buy”) have filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings seeking dismissal of 

all six claims for relief in the pending Second Amended Complaint; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Identity Arts has filed its Opposition thereto; 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 4:05-cv-04656-PJH Document 95 Filed 11/08/06 Page 1 of 3
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA1 60136303.1 - 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

PAGE LIMITATION ON REPLY

Case No. C 05-4656 PJH

 WHEREAS, Best Buy having advised Plaintiff of its position that the 15-page limitation 

normally applicable to a reply brief would be inadequate given the number of legal issues before 

the Court and the extensive case law raised in Plaintiff’s Opposition; 

 WHEREAS, Best Buy having requested a short extension of this page limitation to up to 

20 pages to allow it to adequately brief the issues raised in Plaintiff’s Opposition, Best Buy 

contending the grant of such an extension would be in the interests of justice, and Plaintiff having 

agreed to said extension request: 

 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, subject to Court approval, that Best Buy shall be 

allowed to file a Reply brief of up to 20 pages in length. 

DATED: November 6, 2006 BRADSHAW & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

By: /S/ Scott A. Freedman 

Scott A. Freedman 

 

DATED: November 6, 2006 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 

By: /S/ Robert F. Hinton _

Robert F. Hinton 

David Martinez 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. 

 Executed this 6th day of November 2006, at Los Angeles, California. 

 /S/ Robert F. Hinton 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 4:05-cv-04656-PJH Document 95 Filed 11/08/06 Page 2 of 3
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA1 60136303.1 - 3 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

PAGE LIMITATION ON REPLY

Case No. C 05-4656 PJH

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that Best Buy shall be allowed to file a 

Reply Brief of up to 20 pages in length. 

DATED: __________________________ ___________________________________ 

 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, 

 United States District Judge

11/8/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:05-cv-04656-PJH Document 95 Filed 11/08/06 Page 3 of 3