Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00348/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00348-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CORRECT CIV.S-03-0348 DFL DAD

THE RECORD ON APPEAL

BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General

 of the State of California

ARTHUR D. TAGGART, SBN 83057

 Lead Supervising Deputy Attorney General

JEFFREY M. PHILLIPS, SBN 154990

 Deputy Attorney General

Office of the Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

Post Office Box 944255

Sacramento, California 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 445-1989

Attorneys for Defendants 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL L. POTTS, D.D.S., and THE

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF IMPLANT

DENTISTRY,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KATHLEEN HAMILTON, in her Official

Capacity as Director, California Department of

Consumer Affairs; CYNTHIA GATLIN,

Executive Officer, California Dental Board;

and ALAN H. KAYE, D.D.S., President;

MICHAEL PINKERTON, Vice-President,

Public Member; LA DONNA DRURYKLEIN, R.D.A., Secretary; DAVID I.

BARON, Public Member; NEWTON

GORDON, D.D.S., Member; LAWRENCE

HYNDLEY, D.D.S., Member; PATRICIA

OSUNA, R.D.H., Member; GEORGE

SOOHOO, D.D.S., Member; ARIANE

TERLET, D.D.S., Member; and CHESTER

YOKOHAMA, D.D.S., Member, in their

Official Capacities with the California Dental

Board,

Defendants.

CIV.S-03-0348 DFL DAD

STIPULATION TO CORRECT THE

RECORD ON APPEAL; ORDER

DEFENDANTS present the following stipulation to correct the Record by adding

the following deposition testimony that was erroneously omitted from the Record: 

Case 2:03-cv-00348-JAM-DAD Document 133 Filed 05/10/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION TO CORRECT CIV.S-03-0348 DFL DAD

THE RECORD ON APPEAL

Omitted page/ Pinpoint cite

1. Potts Dep., p. 45-46

 (Potts Dep. 45:25-46:2)

2. Potts Dep., p. 97

 (Potts Dep. 97:4-13)

3. Shuck Dep., p. 10

 (Shuck Dep. 10:3-19)

4. Shuck Dep., p. 10-11.

 (Shuck Dep. 10:20- 

 11:20)

5. Shuck Dep., p. 55

 (Shuck Dep. 54:8-55:23)

6. Shuck Dep., p. 66

 (Shuck Dep. 66:2-7)

7. Shuck Dep., p. 195

 (Shuck Dep. 195:14-19)

8. Stokes Dep., p.56 attached

as Ex. 1 to Supplemental

Decl. of Fay

 (Stokes Dep. 56:5-13, 21- 

 25)

9. Cogan Dep., p. 28-29

attached as Ex. 4 to

Supplemental Decl. of Fay 

(Cogan dep. at 28:24-29:12) 

Citation in Record

Defendants’ Separate

Statement of Undisputed

Material Facts (“SSUMF”),

No. 2

Defendants’ SSUMF No. 7.

Defendants’ SSUMF No. 14.

Defendants’ SSUMF No. 15.

Defendants’ SSUMF No. 17;

Defendants’ MSJ at 13:10-11

Defendants’ SSUMF No. 18;

Defendants’ MSJ at 4:7

Defendants’ SSUMF No. 29

Defendants’ Opposition to

Plaintiffs’ MSJ at 14:7 and

Defendants’ Reply to

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to

Defendants’ Cross-MSJ at

9:11.

Defendants’ Reply to

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to

Defendants’ Cross-MSJ at

9:24

Plaintiff’s Response

“Admitted, but irrelevant”

(Pls. Response to Defs.

SSUMF)

“Admitted, but irrelevant. 

Potts could not remember. . .”

(Pls. Response to Defs.

SSUMF)

“Admitted [but wrong cite]”

(Pls. Response to Defs.

SSUMF.)

“Partially Admitted. . .” (Pls.

Response to Defs. SSUMF)

Partially Denied. Plaintiffs

note that AAID’s verification

process is more then is done

by the Dental Board to verify

CE. . . (Pls. Response to

Defs. SSUMF.)

“Admitted.” (Pls. Response

to Defs. SSUMF.)

“Partially Denied...”

(Pls. Response to Defs.

SSUMF.)

 Reason

Supplemental Declaration of

Fay was filed with the

District Court on 2/27/04 but

this document does not

appear in the lower court’s

docket.

Supplemental Declaration of

Fay was filed with the

District Court on 2/27/04 but

this document does not

appear in the lower court’s

docket.

Case 2:03-cv-00348-JAM-DAD Document 133 Filed 05/10/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION TO CORRECT CIV.S-03-0348 DFL DAD

THE RECORD ON APPEAL

Defendants request and Plaintiffs do not oppose correction of the record of this

action to include the deposition testimony cited in the foregoing references and attached hereto.

Specifically, the record should include the Deposition Testimony of Plaintiff, Michael Potts,

D.D.S., taken on October 22, 2003, at pages 45-46, 97 (attached as Ex. A), the Deposition

Testimony of James Vincent Shuck taken on November 13, 2003, at pages 10-11, 55, 66 and 195

(also attached as Ex. A), the Deposition Testimony of Lynne Stokes, taken on November 24,

2003, at page 56 (attached to Suppl Decl. of Fay as Ex. B), and the Deposition Testimony of

Sandra R. Cogan, Ph.D., taken on November 19, 2003, at pages 28-29 (attached to Suppl Decl.

of Fay as Ex. B), and that the Record should include the pinpoint citations, referenced above.

Dated: ______________________

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

ARTHUR D. TAGGART

Lead Supervising Deputy Attorney General

By: _______________________________

JEFFREY M. PHILLIPS

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated:_______________________ FRANK R. RECKER

FRANK R. RECKER & ASSOCIATES 

CO., L.P.A. and

McDONOUGH, HOLLAND & ALLEN

A Professional Corporation

By: _______________________________

ANN TAYLOR SCHWING

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED.

05/09/2006

/s/ David F. Levi 

JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:03-cv-00348-JAM-DAD Document 133 Filed 05/10/06 Page 3 of 3