Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01833/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01833-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VARIOUS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JEDI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 16-01833 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO

HAC VICE APPLICATIONS

The pro hac vice applications of Attorneys Ralph A. Dengler (Dkt. No. 10), Frank M.

Gasparo (Dkt. No. 11), and Gianna E. Cricco-Lizza (Dkt. No. 12), are DENIED for failing to

comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he or she is

an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of

another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out the

pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar

membership — such as “the bar of the State of New York” — is inadequate under the local rule

because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fees do not need to be paid

again, the applications cannot be processed until corrected forms are submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 19, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-01833-WHA Document 14 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 1