Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00224/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00224-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1Plaintiff indicates that date of the order is June 10, 2005, which is the date the order was

signed, rather than filed.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TYRRALL FARROW CANNON, et al,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S- 05-0224 FCD GGH P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On July 18, 2005, plaintiff filed a document objecting to the magistrate’s order

filed on June 13, 2005.1 The court construes the objection as a request for reconsideration of the

order, wherein plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, with leave to file either an amended

complaint or a habeas petition, as appropriate, and wherein a prematurely filed notice of appeal

as well as a Rule 60(b) motion directed at another case were stricken. Pursuant to E.D. Local

Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary

to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate

judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:05-cv-00224-FCD-GGH Document 14 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed June 13, 2005, is affirmed. 

DATED:July 29, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00224-FCD-GGH Document 14 Filed 07/29/05 Page 2 of 2