Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01110/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01110-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 120
Nature of Suit: Marine Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTHUR DIAMOND,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1110 MCE DAD PS

vs.

STATE FARM MUTUAL

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE

COMPANY, et al., ORDER

Defendants.

 /

On March 31, 2010, the undersigned issued findings are recommendations in this

action recommending that plaintiff’s motion for remand (Doc. No. 18) be granted and that

defendant State Farm’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 14) be denied as moot. An objection period

was inadvertently omitted from those findings and recommendations.

The March 31, 2010 findings and recommendations will be submitted to the

United States District Judge assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with those findings and

recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. A document containing

objections should be titled “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” 

Any reply to objections shall be filed within seven (7) days after the objections are served. The

1

Case 2:09-cv-01110-MCE -DAD Document 59 Filed 04/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may, under certain

circumstances, waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 1, 2010.

Ddad1\orders.prose\diamond1110.o.objections

Case 2:09-cv-01110-MCE -DAD Document 59 Filed 04/01/10 Page 2 of 2