Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02659/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02659-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TIMOTHY O’KEEFE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JERRY BROWN, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:11-cv-2659 KJM KJN P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On January 23, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. 

On February 2, 2015 plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file objections. 

(ECF No. 177.) On February 6, 2015, plaintiff filed objections. (ECF No. 178.) Because 

plaintiff’s objections were timely filed, the motion for extension of time is denied as unnecessary. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court 

finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Case 2:11-cv-02659-KJM-KJN Document 191 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 177) is denied; 

2. The findings and recommendations filed January 23, 2015, are adopted in full; and 

 3. Defendants Hoffman, Heatsie, Bonilla, Brown and Beard and plaintiff’s claim alleging 

a violation of due process based on defendants’ failure to transfer him to RJDCF are dismissed. 

DATED: March 18, 2015. 

Case 2:11-cv-02659-KJM-KJN Document 191 Filed 03/19/15 Page 2 of 2