Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00909/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00909-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

-1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00909-WBS-KJN

716294783.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MAYER BROWN LLP

JOHN NADOLENCO (SBN 181128)

jnadolenco@mayerbrown.com

STEVEN E. RICH (SBN 198412)

srich@mayerbrown.com

350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503

Telephone: (213) 229-9500

Facsimile: (213) 625-0248

Attorneys for Defendant

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID T. HEYDT and JENNIFER 

F. HEYDT, individually, and on 

behalf of the general public,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITIMORTGAGE, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:15-CV-00909-WBS-KJN

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

 

Case 2:15-cv-00909-WBS-KJN Document 11 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 3
-2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00909-WBS-KJN

716294783.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Defendant CitiMortgage, 

Inc. (“Citi”), and Plaintiffs David T. Heydt and Jennifer F. Heydt (the “Plaintiffs,” 

and collectively with Citi, the “Parties”), as follows:

RECITALS

A. On April 27, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint (the “Complaint”) 

against Citi and others.

B. On May 15, 2015, Plaintiffs served their Complaint on Citi’s 

registered agent, making June 5, 2015 Citi’s present deadline to respond to the 

Complaint.

C. Given the number of issues in the 157-paragraph, 6-count Complaint 

and the schedule of counsel for the Parties, the Parties have conferred and agreed 

to extend Citi’s time for responding to the Complaint through and including July 

20, 2015. 

D. Citi has not previously requested any extensions of time in this case, 

and except as described herein, this Stipulation will have no effect on the schedule 

for this case. 

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing and subject to Court 

approval, the Parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Parties incorporate by reference each of the Recitals contained in 

paragraphs A through D hereinabove as if set forth in full herein.

2. The time for Citi to move, answer or otherwise respond to the 

Complaint is extended to and includes July 20, 2015.

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:15-cv-00909-WBS-KJN Document 11 Filed 05/28/15 Page 2 of 3
-3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00909-WBS-KJN

716294783.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. The Parties agree that by entering into this Stipulation, neither Party 

waives any right or remedy. 

Dated: May 27, 2015 MAYER BROWN LLP

By: /s/ Steven E. Rich

Steven E. Rich

Attorneys for Defendant

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

Dated: May 27, 2015 CONSUMERS FIRST ATTORNEYS, LLP

By:/s/ Jeremy K. Heeber (as authorized on 

5/27/15) 

Jeremy K. Heebner

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DAVID T. HEYDT and JENNIFER F. 

HEYDT

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 28, 2015

Case 2:15-cv-00909-WBS-KJN Document 11 Filed 05/28/15 Page 3 of 3