Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04374/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04374-57/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY’S 

AND ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS’ COUNTERCLAIM OF INEQUITABLE CONDUCT 

Lead Case No. 05-CV-04374 MMC; Consolidated with No. 05-CV-03560 MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAUL J. ANDRE, Bar No. 196585 

pandre@perkinscoie.com

LISA KOBIALKA, Bar No. 191404 

lkobialka@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

101 Jefferson Drive 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 838-4300 

Facsimile: (650) 838-4350 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS AND 

SERVICE, INC., and Defendant ULTRA CLEAN 

HOLDINGS, INC. 

KEITH L. SLENKOVICH, CA BAR NO. 129793 

kslenkovich@thelen.com

ROBERT E. CAMORS, JR., CA BAR NO. 121204 

bobcamors@thelen.com

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

225 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 1200 

San Jose, CA 95113-1723 

Tel. 408.292.5800 

Fax 408.287.8040 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

CELERITY, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CELERITY, INC. 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 

 v. 

ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 

AND SERVICE, INC. 

 Defendant/Counterclaimant 

 and 

ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC. 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 05-CV-04374 MMC 

(consolidated with No. C-05-CV-03560 MMC)

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY 

SYSTEMS AND SERVICE, INC.’S AND 

ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC.’S 

COUNTERCLAIM OF INEQUITABLE 

CONDUCT ; SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

Case 3:05-cv-04374-MMC Document 493 Filed 09/27/07 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY’S 1

AND ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS’ COUNTERCLAIM OF INEQUITABLE CONDUCT 

Lead Case No. 05-CV-04374 MMC; Consolidated with No. 05-CV-03560 MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Celerity, Inc. (“Celerity”) obtained a verdict that Ultra Clean Technology 

Systems and Service, Inc.’s (“Ultra Clean Technology”) Predator product infringes U.S. Patent 

No. 6,435,215 (“the ‘215 patent”). 

WHEREAS, Ultra Clean Technology’s and Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.’s (“Ultra Clean 

Holdings”) counterclaim alleging inequitable conduct during the prosecution of the ‘215 patent 

and U.S. Patent Nos. 6,142,539; 6,189,570; 6,192,938; 6,293,310; 6,394,138; and 6,474,700 

remains pending before the Court; 

WHEREAS, the Court has set a trial date of October 22-23, 2007 on Ultra Clean 

Holdings’ inequitable conduct claims; 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between 

Celerity, Ultra Clean Technology, and Ultra Clean Holdings, by and through their respective 

attorneys of record, that: 

 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Ultra Clean Technology’s 

and Ultra Clean Holdings’ counterclaim of inequitable conduct against Celerity shall be dismissed 

with prejudice. 

 2. The trial date of October 22-23, 2007 is hereby vacated, and the parties are hereby 

directed to appear at a case management conference to discuss further proceedings on this case, at 

the following date/time: ____________________________________________. 

PERKINS COIE LLP 

Dated: September 26, 2007. By: /s/ 

Paul J. Andre 

Lisa Kobialka 

James R. Hannah 

Amy Sun 

Sean M. Boyle 

Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimant 

ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY 

SYSTEMS AND SERVICE, INC., AND 

ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC. 

Case 3:05-cv-04374-MMC Document 493 Filed 09/27/07 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY’S 2

AND ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS’ COUNTERCLAIM OF INEQUITABLE CONDUCT 

Lead Case No. 05-CV-04374 MMC; Consolidated with No. 05-CV- 03560 MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER LLP 

Dated: September 26, 2007. By: /s/ 

Keith L. Slenkovich 

Robert E. Camors, Jr. 

Richard S. Swope 

Samuel J. Maselli 

Karin M. Frenza 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

CELERITY, INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September ___, 2007. By: 

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Court Judge 

SV #310221 v1 

The parties shall appear at a Case Management Conference to be conducted on

September 28, 2007, at 10:30 a.m. All parties shall appear telephonically.

27

Case 3:05-cv-04374-MMC Document 493 Filed 09/27/07 Page 3 of 3