Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00570/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00570-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] DEFAULT JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00570-AWI-DLB

JOHN G. MICHAEL #106107

BAKER, MANOCK & JENSEN

5260 N. Palm Avenue

Fourth Floor

Fresno, California 93704

Telephone: 559-432-5400

Facsimile: 559-432-5620

E-Mail: jgm@bmj-law.com

KAREN R. THORLAND #172092

W. ALLAN EDMISTON #228246

LOEB & LOEB LLP

10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2200

Los Angeles, California 90067-4164

Telephone: 310-282-2000

Facsimile: 310-282-2200

Email: kthorland@loeb.com

Email: aedmiston@loeb.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEW LINE PRODUCTIONS, INC., a

Delaware corporation; WARNER BROS.

ENTERTAINMENT INC., a Delaware

corporation ; PARAMOUNT PICTURES

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and

DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., a Delaware

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KEITH CARTER,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:06-cv-00570-AWI-DLB

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RE: DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND

PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Based upon Plaintiffs' Application For Default Judgment By The Court, and good cause

appearing therefore, it is hereby Recommended that the Court Order and Adjudge that: 

Case 1:06-cv-00570-AWI-DLB Document 15 Filed 12/01/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] DEFAULT JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00570-AWI-DLB

2

1. Defendant shall pay damages to Plaintiffs for infringement of Plaintiffs' 

copyrights in the motion pictures listed on Exhibit A to the Complaint, in the total 

principal sum of Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000.00).

2. Defendant shall pay Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and costs of suit herein in the 

amount of One Thousand Six Hundred Ninety-nine Dollars and Eighty Cents

($1,699.80).

3. Defendant shall be and hereby is enjoined from directly or indirectly 

infringing Plaintiffs' rights under federal or state law in the following copyrighted 

motion pictures: 

• The lncredibles;

• National Treasure;

• Elf;

• Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow;

• Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban; and 

any other motion picture, whether now in existence or later 

created, that is owned or controlled by Plaintiffs (or any parent, 

subsidiary, or affiliate of Plaintiffs) ("Plaintiffs' Motion 

Pictures"), including without limitation by using the Internet or any 

online media distribution system to reproduce (i.e., download) 

any of Plaintiffs' Motion Pictures, to distribute (i.e., upload) any of Plaintiffs' 

Motion Pictures, or to make any of Plaintiffs' Motion 

Pictures available for distribution to the public, except pursuant to 

a lawful license or with the express authority of Plaintiffs.

Defendant also shall destroy all copies of Plaintiffs' Motion 

Pictures that Defendant has downloaded onto any computer hard 

drive or server without Plaintiffs' authorization and shall destroy 

Case 1:06-cv-00570-AWI-DLB Document 15 Filed 12/01/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] DEFAULT JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00570-AWI-DLB

3

all copies of those downloaded recordings transferred onto any 

physical medium or device in Defendant's possession, custody, or 

control. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 10 days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.

1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 1, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00570-AWI-DLB Document 15 Filed 12/01/06 Page 3 of 3