Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02485/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02485-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT CRUZ, 2:06-cv-2485-GEB-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

DEL PRADO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s December 11, 2006, order.

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate

judge’s order shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the

entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

erroneous or contrary to law. Specifically, the order notes several defects in plaintiff’s complaint

and dismisses with leave to amend. To the extent plaintiff disagrees with the magistrate judge’s

characterization of the allegations in the complaint, plaintiff may clarify those allegations in his

amended complaint. The December 11, 2006, order is, therefore, affirmed.

Case 2:06-cv-02485-GEB-CMK Document 14 Filed 01/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion for reconsideration is denied; and

2. The magistrate judge’s December 11, 2006, order is affirmed.

Dated: January 25, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-02485-GEB-CMK Document 14 Filed 01/26/07 Page 2 of 2