Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_17-cv-00309/USCOURTS-cand-5_17-cv-00309-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

INSIGHT GLOBAL, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEACON HILL STAFFING GROUP, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00309-BLF 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S NONDISPOSITIVE PRE-TRIAL ORDER

[Re: ECF 47]

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Order 

of Magistrate Judge (ECF 46). ECF 47. A magistrate judge’s non-dispositive pre-trial order may 

be modified or set aside if it is “clearly erroneous or is contrary to law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). 

“[T]he magistrate’s factual determinations are reviewed for clear error, and the magistrate’s legal 

conclusions are reviewed to determine whether they are contrary to law.” Perry v. 

Schwarzenegger, 268 F.R.D. 344, 348 (N.D. Cal. 2010). 

Having reviewed Defendant’s motion and the magistrate judge’s pre-trial order (ECF 46), 

the Court finds no “clear error” in the magistrate judge’s factual determinations and does not find 

that the magistrate judge’s legal conclusions are “contrary to law.” See Perry, 268 F.R.D. at 348. 

Accordingly, Defendant’s motion at ECF 47 is hereby DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 9, 2019

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00309-BLF Document 48 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 1