Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01176/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01176-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EDDIE DUNBAR,

aka ALAMIN SAMAD,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1176 GEB PAN P

vs.

A. K. SCRIBNER, et al., ORDER

Respondents.

-oOoOn June 28, 2005, the court dismissed this action as timebarred and denied petitioner’s motions for summary judgment and

the clerk of the court duly entered judgment. Petitioner moves

to amend the judgment to reflect consideration of his October 27,

2004, motion for an evidentiary hearing. 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a): 

Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts

of the record and errors therein arising from oversight

or omission may be corrected by the court at any time

of its own initiative or on the motion of any party and

after such notice, if any, as the court orders. During

the pendency of an appeal, such mistakes may be so

corrected before the appeal is docketed in the 

Case 2:04-cv-01176-GEB-PAN Document 22 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

appellate court, and thereafter while the appeal is

pending my be so corrected with leave of the appellate

court.

Through clerical oversight, the court did not mention the

motion for an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, plaintiff’s July

21, 2005, motion is granted and the order and judgment entered

June 28, 2005, are vacated.

The court hereby orders the following:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 2, 2005, are

adopted in full;

2. Respondents’ October 7, 2004, motion to dismiss is

granted;

3. Petitioner’s October 27, 2004, motion for an evidentiary

hearing and for summary judgment is denied;

4. Petitioner’s December 1, 2004, motion for summary

judgment is denied;

5. This action is dismissed as untimely.

So ordered.

Dated: August 15, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01176-GEB-PAN Document 22 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2