Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00674/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00674-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 490
Nature of Suit: Cable/ Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 47:553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., CASE NO. CV F 11-0674 LJO SKO

Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS 

SHOULDNOTBEIMPOSEDFORFAILURETO

vs. OBEY ORDER

(Doc. 19.)

MANUEL CANO CANO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

This Court’s November 29, 2011 order and Local Rule 281(a)(2) required the parties, no later

than January 2, 2013, to file a joint pretrial statement. The parties have disobeyed the November 29,

2011 order and Local Rule 281(a)(2) in failing to file a joint pretrial statement. The parties failed to seek

an extension to file a joint pretrial statement, and this Court will entertain no extension of dates set by

the November 29, 2011 order.

This Court’s Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with an order of this Court “may

be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within

the inherent power of the Court.”

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than January 7, 2013, to file papers to

show cause why sanctions, including dismissal of claims or monetary sanctions, should not be imposed

for failure to comply with the November 29, 2011 order and Local Rule 281(a)(2). At this point, this

Court contemplates dismissing this case and/or imposing a $750 sanction on each parties’ counsel.

This Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they are required to observe and comply

1

Case 1:11-cv-00674-LJO-JLT Document 21 Filed 01/03/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders and are subject to

sanctions as this Court deems appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 66h44d

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:11-cv-00674-LJO-JLT Document 21 Filed 01/03/13 Page 2 of 2