Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00886/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00886-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 896
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Arbitration
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH NEWBY, et al.,

Petitioners,

v.

TREYLED LIFE SETTLEMENTS LLC,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:24-cv-00886-JLT-SAB

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONERS’

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

(ECF No. 14)

On August 16, 2024, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss Petitioners’ petition to vacate 

the arbitration award. (ECF No. 9.) On August 26, 2024, Petitioners filed a motion for an 

extension of time until September 10, 2024 to file an opposition to Respondent’s motion.

1

 (ECF 

No. 14.) Petitioners’ counsel proffers the request is due to a pre-planned vacation and the 

substantial complexity of the issues presented. Petitioners assert that Respondent’s counsel has 

been contacted and does not oppose extending the deadline for Petitioners to file their 

opposition. (Id. at 2.) 

The Court finds good cause to grant Petitioners’ request for an extension. However, 

where the request to extend time is agreed upon by the parties, counsel is advised that a 

stipulation should be filed that is signed by all parties who are affected. (See L.R. 144.) 

1 Petitioners’ motion states they seek a seven-day extension of time. However, this request is based upon a 

miscalculation of the current deadline of Petitioners’ opposition. Respondent’s motion to dismiss was filed on 

August 16, 2024. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Petitioners’ opposition is due fourteen days after the motion was 

filed, or August 30, 2024. Thus, Petitioners request an eleven-day extension of time to file their opposition. 

Case 1:24-cv-00886-JLT-SAB Document 16 Filed 08/27/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioners’ unopposed motion to extend the time to file an opposition to 

Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED;

2. Petitioners shall file an opposition to Respondent’s motion to dismiss on or 

before September 10, 2024; and 

3. Respondent’s reply, if any, shall be filed no later than ten (10) days after the 

opposition is filed pursuant to Local Rule 230(d). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 27, 2024 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:24-cv-00886-JLT-SAB Document 16 Filed 08/27/24 Page 2 of 2