Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-02061/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-02061-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISHNA REDDY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PRECYSE SOLUTIONS LLC,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-02061-AWI-SAB

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S EX 

PARTE APPLICATION SHORTENING 

TIME TO HEAR DEFENDANT’S 

AMENDED MOTION TO AMEND THE 

SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendant Precyse Solutions LLC filed an ex parte motion to amend the scheduling order 

on April 10, 2015. The Court issued an order on April 13, 2015, advising the parties that 

amendment of the scheduling order would be addressed at the May 6, 2015 hearing on Plaintiff’s 

motion for a protective order. On April 14, 2015, Defendant filed an amended motion to amend 

the scheduling order and an ex parte application for an order shortening time for the hearing. 

As the Court has previously ordered that Defendant’s request to amend the scheduling 

order shall be considered at the May 6, 2015 hearing, the Court will grant Defendant’s ex parte

application for an order shortening time.

According, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant’s amended motion to amend the scheduling order shall be heard on 

Case 1:12-cv-02061-AWI-SAB Document 76 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

May 6, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9; 

2. Plaintiff’s opposition to the amended motion shall be filed on or before April 

27, 2015; and 

3. Defendant’s reply, if any shall be filed on or before May 4, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-02061-AWI-SAB Document 76 Filed 04/15/15 Page 2 of 2