Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01740/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01740-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

-1-

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Case No. C 06-01740 JW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERT B. NICHOLS (SB# 224763)

nichols@nicholslawgroup.com

300 South First Street, Suite 205

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone: (408) 298-9755

Facsimile: (408) 298-9699

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DAVID DAY

STEPHEN H. HARRIS (SB# 184608)

stephenharris@paulhastings.com

CAROLINE L. ELKIN (SB# 209156)

carolineelkin@paulhastings.com

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

515 South Flower Street

Twenty-Fifth Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228

Telephone: (213) 683-6000

Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 Attorneys for Defendant

AT&T DISABILITY INCOME PLAN

(formerly known as SBC DISABILITY INCOME PLAN)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAVID DAY, )

Plaintiff, ) Case No. C 06 01740 JW

)

vs. )

) JOINT STIPULATION TO 

) EXTEND TIME FOR FILING 

) FEE APPLICATION

SBC DISABILITY INCOME PLAN )

Defendant. )

__________________________________________

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OT TIME

TO FILE APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

WHEREAS, The Court on March 21, 2008, issued an Order Denying Defendant’s 

Motion For Summary Judgment; Granting and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment; and Remanding for a determination of Plaintiff’s Short Term Benefits.

WHEREAS, former Plaintiff Counsel filed a fee application on Thursday, April 3, 2008; 

but current Plaintiff Counsel and Defendant are still discussing his fees and costs. 

WHEREAS, present Plaintiff Counsel and Defendant may be able to resolve attorney’s 

fees and costs without burdening the Court with a motion.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:06-cv-01740-JW Document 79 Filed 04/10/08 Page 1 of 2
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Case No. C 06-01740 JW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THEREFORE, all parties and their counsel stipulate to and request the Court’s approval 

of the following matter.

1. To the extent they exist, any time limits on Plaintiff’s Counsel for submitting 

an application for fees and costs are extended for 30 days.

Dated: April 3, 2008 /s/ Robert B. Nichols 

Robert B. Nichols

Attorneys for David Day

Dated: April 3, 2008 /s/ Caroline L. Elkin

Stephen H. Harris

Caroline L. Elkin

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. To the Extent they exist, any time limits on Plaintiff’s Counsel for submitting 

an application for fees and costs are extended for 30 days.

San Jose, California, this _____ day of ________________, 2007.

_________________________________________

JAMES WARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10 April

Case 5:06-cv-01740-JW Document 79 Filed 04/10/08 Page 2 of 2