Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00679/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00679-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAUNDELLE DIAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANDRE MATEVOUSION, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:18-cv-00679-DAD-JDP (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

CASE

(Doc. No. 25)

Plaintiff Shaundelle Dial is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 

this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On July 3, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 

recommending that plaintiff’s case be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failures to prosecute and 

comply with court orders. (Doc. No. 25.) The findings and recommendations were served on 

plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) 

days after service. (Id. at 3.) On July 16, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge granted plaintiff’s 

first motion for extension of time and provided him an additional fourteen days to file objections. 

(Doc. No. 27.) On August 21, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge granted plaintiff’s second 

motion for extension of time and approved an additional fourteen days to file objections. (Doc. 

Case 1:18-cv-00679-DAD-JDP Document 30 Filed 01/14/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

No. 29.) No objections have been filed and the time in which to do so has now passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

Accordingly:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on July 3, 2019 (Doc. No. 25) are 

adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s action is dismissed without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2020 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:18-cv-00679-DAD-JDP Document 30 Filed 01/14/20 Page 2 of 2