Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05566/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05566-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1001 E.R.I.S.A.

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 06-5566 CRB – EDL

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

D. Ward Kallstrom, State Bar No. 76937

Nicole A. Diller, State Bar No. 154842

Christopher M. Ahearn, State Bar No. 239089

One Market, Spear Street Tower

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126

Tel: 415.442.1000

Fax: 415.442.1001

Attorneys for Defendants

Bechtel Corporation, The Bechtel Trust & Thrift 

Plan Administrative Committee, and Peggi Knox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

BEVERLY KANAWI AND SALVADOR 

AQUINO,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BECHTEL CORPORATION, THE 

BECHTEL TRUST & THRIFT PLAN 

ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, AND 

PEGGI KNOX, 

Defendants.

Case No. C 06-5566 CRB - EDL

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SEAL 

DOCUMENTS DESIGNATED BY 

DEFENDANTS AS CONFIDENTIAL 

RELATED TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO 

CONFIRM FOCUS TOPICS AND TO 

CLARIFY TIME FRAME FOR 

DISCOVERY

The Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:06-cv-05566-CRB Document 121 Filed 10/29/07 Page 1 of 2
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 06-5566 CRB – EDL

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

On October 1, 2007, Plaintiffs filed an administrative application to seal documents (the 

“Administrative Application”) related to Plaintiffs’ Motions to Confirm Focus Topics and to 

Clarify Time Frame for Discovery, filed on October 1, 2007 (the “Motions”). Plaintiffs requested

that certain documents marked “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by 

Defendants be sealed, which Plaintiffs have lodged with the Court.

The parties stipulated to the entry of a protective order in this case, which the Court 

entered on May 29, 2007 (the “Protective Order”). In connection with the Joint Initial Discovery

Plan and Order in this case and Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ First Request for Production, 

Defendants produced a number of documents which they designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” under the Protective Order, including the documents identified in 

the Administrative Applications. Defendants filed the Declaration of D. Ward Kallstrom in 

Support of Plaintiffs’ Application to File Documents Under Seal Re Motion to Confirm Focus 

Topics and to Clarify Time Frame for Discovery, which showed that good cause exists for filing 

under seal the documents indentified in the Administrative Application.

For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the documents listed in the 

Administrative Applications be filed under seal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________, 2007

Elizabeth D. Laporte

Magistrate Judge of the United StatesDistrict 

Court

1-SF/7621136.1

October 29

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:06-cv-05566-CRB Document 121 Filed 10/29/07 Page 2 of 2