Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05226/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05226-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

TRAVIS FRANCE PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-5226 

DEPUTY GRANT; DEPUTY 

DAPP; DR. HUSKINS;

and NURSE SUE McDONALD DEFENDANTS

ORDER

On April 17, 2008, the plaintiff filed two motions to compel (Doc. 44) and (Doc. 45).

In his first motion to compel (Doc. 44), he contends he served requests for the production of

documents on the defendants on January 22, 2008, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure and has received no response from the defendants. 

In the second motion to compel (Doc. 45), he contends he served interrogatories on the

defendants on January 22, 2008. Plaintiff states that on March 3, 2008, he received some

responses but did not receive responses to the interrogatories directed to Deputy Dapp. Instead,

he states counsel for defendants requested additional time to finalize Deputy Dapp's answers to

the interrogatories. To date, plaintiff states he has received no further response.

In response to the motions to compel (Doc. 46), defendants state they did receive the

interrogatories on January 28, 2008, but did not receive any requests for the production of

documents. Defendants state they first received the requests for the production of documents on

April 17th as an exhibit to the motion to compel. Defendants indicate they will respond to these

Case 5:06-cv-05226-JLH Document 47 Filed 05/12/08 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

-2-

requests within thirty days from the date they were received. Given this representation,

plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 44) is denied.

As to the second motion to compel (Doc. 45), defendants' counsel indicates he still has

not received Defendant Dapp's answers to interrogatories. Defendants' counsel states he is in the

process of attempting to locate Defendant Dapp. Defendants' counsel indicates Defendant Dapp

is no longer in the employ of the Benton County Detention Center. Plaintiff's motion to compel

(Doc. 45) is granted. Defendant Dapp is given until May 27, 2008, to provide his

interrogatory responses to the plaintiff. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of May 2008.

/s/ J. Marschewski 

HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-05226-JLH Document 47 Filed 05/12/08 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>