Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00423/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00423-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO HJ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Dial Up Services, Inc., d/b/a/ Simple.Net,

a Nevada Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

State of Oregon, State of Idaho, State of

North Dakota, State of Missouri, The

Honorable David E. Reich, Judge of the

South Central Judicial District of the State

of North Dakota, Kathryn Sticklen,

Honorable Judge of the Fourth Judicial

Distric of the State of Idaho, Various

States 1-XXX,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 07-00423-PHX-EHC

ORDER

Before the Court is “Plaintiff’s Motion to (1) Amend or Make Additional Factual

Fundings [sic] Under Rule 52(b); (2) To Alter or Amend the Judgment Under Rule 59(e); (3)

For a New Trial Under Rule 59(a); and (4) For Relief Under Rule 60" (Dkt. 60). Plaintiff

contends that the Court failed to consider the implications of footnote 12 in the case of

Sandpiper Village v. Louisiana-Pacific, 428 F.3d 831 (9th Cir. 2005). The Court has

considered Sandpiper. Nothing in the cited portions of Sandpiper changes the outcome of

this case. The Court’s continuing jurisdiction over the stipulated final judgment entered in

Civ. No. 01-00803-SMM is not at risk, nor is res judicata implicated.

//

Case 2:07-cv-00423-EHC Document 61 Filed 12/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion to (1) Amend or Make Additional

Factual Fundings [sic] Under Rule 52(b); (2) To Alter or Amend the Judgment Under Rule

59(e); (3) For a New Trial Under Rule 59(a); and (4) For Relief Under Rule 60" (Dkt. 60).

DATED this 3rd day of December, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-00423-EHC Document 61 Filed 12/04/07 Page 2 of 2