Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00665/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00665-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY F. DUNLAP, 

Plaintiff,

 v.

C. O. RANDOW, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. C 05-0665 JSW (PR)

SCHEDULING ORDER

Plaintiff, a former state prisoner at Pelican Bay State Prison in Crescent City,

California, filed this civil rights complaint. On May 31, 2006, the Court ordered service

of the amended complaint on Defendant and ordered that Defendant file a dispositive

motion within sixty days of the Court’s order (docket no. 11). On July 21, 2006,

Defendant requested an extension of time to file a dispositive motion until September 28,

2006, which was granted (docket no. 16). On August 18, 2006, Defendant filed a notice

of substitution of counsel and on September 26, 2006, a further motion seeking an

extension of time to file a dispositive motion. The Court granted the motion and

Defendant was provided until December 22, 2006 to file a dispositive motion. 

Thereafter, on December 13, 2006, Defendant filed a “notice” that no dispositive motion

would be filed and that Defendant “reserves his right” to file such a motion on

completion of discovery. 

More than one year has passed since Defendant filed his last motion seeking an

extension of time and no dispositive motion has been filed in this case. Defendant will

be provided with one further opportunity to file a dispositive motion in this matter within

sixty days of the date of this order. No further extensions will be considered, except

Case 3:05-cv-00665-JSW Document 27 Filed 10/30/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

upon a showing of exceptional circumstances. If Defendant does not wish to file a

dispositive motion, the Court will reconsider it’s earlier order denying Plaintiff’s motion

for counsel and the case will be set down for trial. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 30, 2007 JEFFREY S. WHITE

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00665-JSW Document 27 Filed 10/30/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUNLAP,

Plaintiff,

 v.

RANDOW et al,

Defendant. /

Case Number: CV05-00665 JSW 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District

Court, Northern District of California.

That on October 30, 2007, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing

said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office

delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Henry F. Dunlap

238 West Lowell Street

Stockton, CA 95206

Timothy Patrick Murphy

Edrington Schirmer & Murphy

The Terraces

2300 Contra Costa Boulevard

Suite 450

Pleasant Hill, CA 94523

Dated: October 30, 2007

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:05-cv-00665-JSW Document 27 Filed 10/30/07 Page 3 of 3