Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02809/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02809-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMIE CURTIN, 

Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-2809-MCE-EFB PS

vs.

CYNTHIA CURTIN; AMADOR

COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE 

SERVICES; LORI MONI; JUDGE 

JUDY HARLIN; JESSE FONBUAYNA,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, is before the

undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1). On November 21, 2012, the undersigned dismissed plaintiff’s complaint pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), explained the deficiencies in the complaint, and provided plaintiff

thirty days to file an amended complaint. Dckt. No. 3. The order warned that failure to file an

amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 7. 

The deadline has now passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

////

////

1

Case 2:12-cv-02809-MCE-EFB Document 4 Filed 01/03/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R.

110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 3, 2013.

2

Case 2:12-cv-02809-MCE-EFB Document 4 Filed 01/03/13 Page 2 of 2