Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-2_12-cv-02734/USCOURTS-alnd-2_12-cv-02734-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KD, a minor child, by and through her )

parents and guardians, JD and SD, )

)

Plaintiff )

)

vs. ) Case No. 2:12-cv-02734-HGD

)

MICHAEL WAYNE WOOTEN, et al., )

)

Defendants )

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendants Birmingham Board of Education (Board) and Aaron Moyana filed

a Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. (Doc. 23). Plaintiff filed a response

to the motion (Doc. 27), in which it is conceded that the motion is due to be granted. 

Based on plaintiff’s concession, it is RECOMMENDED that defendants’

Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings be GRANTED as to:

(1) all state law claims against the Board for negligent, wanton and/or

reckless hiring, training, supervision and retention, outrage and

defamation, based on immunity;

(2) all claims for punitive damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the

Board; and

(3) all official capacity claims against Moyana, including all claims for

punitive damages against Moyana in his official capacity.

FILED

 2013 Jan-02 PM 01:59

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 2:12-cv-02734-SGC Document 29 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT

The parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to this Report and

Recommendation within a period of fourteen (14) days from the date of entry. Any

objections filed must specifically identify the findings in the magistrate judge’s

recommendation objected to. Frivolous, conclusive, or general objections will not be

considered by the district court. 

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations

of the magistrate judge’sreport shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the

district court of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on

appeal factual findings in the report accepted or adopted by the district court except on

grounds of plain error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th

Cir. Unit B 1982). See Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11th Cir. 1982). 

See also Bonner v. Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopting as

binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior

to the close of business on September 30, 1981.

DONE this 2nd day of January, 2013.

 

HARWELL G. DAVIS, III

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Page 2 of 2

Case 2:12-cv-02734-SGC Document 29 Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 2