Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00491/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00491-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Tommy Don Drew, 

Petitioner,

vs.

Dora Schriro, et al.,

Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-0491-PHX-PGR (GEE)

 

 ORDER

Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Edmonds notwithstanding that no party has filed any objection to the

Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly

concluded that the petitioner did not file his habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 until almost ten years after the expiration of the limitations period

mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(doc. #18) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner Drew’s Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is

denied as time-barred and that this action is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court

/ / /

Case 2:07-cv-00491-PGR Document 19 Filed 03/24/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

- 2 -

shall enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 24th day of March, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-00491-PGR Document 19 Filed 03/24/08 Page 2 of 2