Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-00180/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-00180-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL JAMES,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:18-cv-0180 TLN DB PS

ORDER

On January 26, 2018, Daniel James commenced this action proceeding pro se. (ECF No. 

1.) The matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 

302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 12, 2020, attorney Dennise Henderson

substituted in on plaintiff’s behalf. (ECF No. 20.) 

Because plaintiff is no longer proceeding pro se in this action, Local Rule 302(c)(21) no 

longer applies and the case will be referred back to the assigned District Judge. Therefore, all 

pretrial motions, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed for hearing before the 

District Judge assigned to this action. The assigned magistrate judge shall continue to perform all 

duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20).

////

////

////

Case 2:18-cv-00180-DAD-DB Document 21 Filed 03/16/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action pursuant to 

Local Rule 302(c)(21);

2. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; and

3. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be 

No. 2:18-cv-0180 TLN DB with the “PS” designation being eliminated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 15, 2020 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:18-cv-00180-DAD-DB Document 21 Filed 03/16/20 Page 2 of 2