Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01114/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01114-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1114

JAMES LAMAR FRASIER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAROLINA CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

COUNTY OF CHARLESTON; CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; AL 

CANNON, JR., in his official capacity as Sheriff of Charleston 

County; CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; MITCH LUCAS, in 

his official capacity as Administrator of the Charleston 

County Detention Center; CORIZON HEALTH, INCORPORATED, f/k/a 

Prison Health Services, Incorporated; JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; 

JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE 4; JOHN DOE 5,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(4:11-cv-03431-DCN)

Submitted: January 19, 2017 Decided: February 24, 2017

Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 16-1114 Doc: 38 Filed: 02/24/2017 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Brian C. Duffy, Thomas A. Limehouse, Jr., DUFFY & YOUNG, LLC, 

Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Stephen L. Brown, 

Russell G. Hines, YOUNG CLEMENT RIVERS, LLP, Charleston, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1114 Doc: 38 Filed: 02/24/2017 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

James Lamar Frasier appeals the district court’s order 

denying his renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and 

motion for a new trial, following the jury verdict in favor of 

Carolina Center for Occupational Health, LLC, in Frasier’s medical 

malpractice action. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the 

record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Frasier v. 

Carolina Center for Occupational Health, LLC, No. 4:11-cv-03431-

DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1114 Doc: 38 Filed: 02/24/2017 Pg: 3 of 3