Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01361/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01361-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY CHARLES BOWLIN, II,

Petitioner,

v.

C. CHRONES, WARDEN,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 06-1361 LJO DLB HC

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

TO STAY PROCEEDING AND GRANTING

PETITION ER A FOURTH EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE

[Doc. 24]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s motion to stay the proceedings, filed on October

19, 2007. (Court Doc. 24.) Petitioner has previously filed three extensions of time, which have

been granted. (Court Docs. 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23.) 

In his current motion to stay the proceedings, Petitioner contends that he not been

provided access to the law library in order to prepare and file his traverse. (Court Doc. 24.) 

Petitioner requests that the Court stay the proceedings or grant him an extension of time. (Id.) 

Petitioner is advised that the Court will not stay the proceedings, the Court will however grant

Petitioner an extension of time in order for him to can access to the law library to assist him in

preparing his traverse. 

///

///

Case 1:06-cv-01361-LJO-DLB Document 25 Filed 11/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Although Petitioner contends that his access to the law library has been impeded, Petitioner does not 1

provide pecific details of his efforts to obtain access to the law library and his resulting impediments. Should a

further extension of time be necessary, Petitioner must accompany such motion with sufficient details of such

circumstances. 

2

On the basis of GOOD CAUSE, Petitioner’s fourth request for an extension of time is

GRANTED, and Petitioner is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order to

file his traverse. 

1

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 2, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

ah0l4d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01361-LJO-DLB Document 25 Filed 11/02/07 Page 2 of 2