Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00727/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00727-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE L. YOUNGBLOOD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0727 LKK DAD P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On March 28, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed March 6, 2006, denying plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel,

requests for extension of time, requests for USM-285 forms, request for a speedy trial, and

application for a writ of possession. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s

orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire

file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00727-LKK -DAD Document 35 Filed 04/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed March 6, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: April 20, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/youn727.850

Case 2:05-cv-00727-LKK -DAD Document 35 Filed 04/20/06 Page 2 of 2