Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01083/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01083-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON MICHAEL JUDD,

Petitioner,

vs.

ANTHONY LAMARQUE, Warden,

Respondent.

No. 2:02-cv–1083-JKS

FINAL JUDGMENT

The court having entered its Memorandum Decision of even date herewith disposing of

all the issues raised by the Petitioner,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the Petition Under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the court declines to issue a Certificate of

Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (“reasonable

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been

resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve

encouragement to proceed further” (internal quotation marks omitted)). All federal

constitutional issues properly raised in the petition were either addressed by the California Court

of Appeal in its decision, the California Superior Court on the first round of state habeas

petitions, or deemed addressed by the California Supreme Court in denying Petitioner’s second

petition for habeas relief before that court and no reasonable jurist could find that those decisions

were “objectively unreasonable.”

Dated: March 27, 2007.

s/ James K. Singleton, Jr.

JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:02-cv-01083-JKS Document 60 Filed 03/27/07 Page 1 of 1