Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00010/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00010-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTINA SMITH, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL

PARTNERS, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 10-00010 JSW

ORDER VACATING HEARINGS

ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

FOR LEAVE TO FILE

Defendants have filed two motions for leave to file supplemental requests for judicial

notice, Docket Nos. 175 and 185. The Court recognizes those motions for leave to file as

motions for administrative relief pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11. On December 3, 2010,

Plaintiffs filed their response to Defendants motion filed on December 2, 2010. Plaintiffs must

file any opposition to or support for the motion filed on January 4, 2011, within the time

permitted by Civil Local Rule 7-11, after which the motion will be deemed submitted. The

hearings on the motions that Defendants have noticed for January 28, 2011 and February 11,

2011, are VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2011 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document 187 Filed 01/05/11 Page 1 of 1