Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_05-cv-00497/USCOURTS-ared-4_05-cv-00497-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

In re: 

PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

HELENE RUSH

v.

WYETH

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: 

MDL Docket No. 4:03CV1507-WRW

 4:05CV00497

PLAINTIFF

 

 DEFENDANT

ORDER

For exhibits that the Court did not rule admissible or inadmissible at the pretrial hearing

because the proponent “held” the exhibits, the proponent will not show the exhibit to a witness

without first notifying the opposing party that it intends to use the exhibit and obtaining a ruling

on admissibility from the Court.

Each party will notify the other 48 hours in advance of the witnesses it intends to call and

36 hours in advance of the documents it intends to use, except for documents to be used solely

for cross-examination or impeachment. For example, a party will notify the other at the

beginning of court on Monday morning of the witnesses it intends to call on Wednesday and at

the end of court on Monday afternoon of the documents it intends to use on Wednesday. 

This applies only to direct examination of witnesses and does not apply to crossexamination of witnesses.

The Court anticipates that it will rule on the admissibility of “held” documents on the day

before a party intends to use them.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2006.

/s/ Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:05-cv-00497-BRW Document 416 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 1