Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00475/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00475-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMANDA AJULUCHUKU, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

IRS, )

Defendant. )

)

 )

1:05-CV-00475-OWW-SMS 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 4)

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an

action alleging violation of her civil rights pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and

72-304. On April 13, 2005, Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck filed

findings and a recommendation that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s

complaint without leave to amend because it was legally

frivolous. Plaintiff was granted thirty days within which to file

objections. The findings and recommendation were served on all

parties on April 13, 2005.

On April 21 and 22, 2005, Plaintiff filed objections to the

findings and recommendations. The undersigned has considered the

Case 1:05-cv-00475-OWW -SMS Document 7 Filed 05/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections and has determined there is no need to modify the

findings and recommendations based on the points raised in the

objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the findings and recommendation are

supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 13, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The action IS DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted; and

3. The Clerk of Court IS DIRECTED to close this action

because this order terminates the action in its entirety.IT IS SO

ORDERED.

Emm0d6Dated: May 2, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00475-OWW -SMS Document 7 Filed 05/06/05 Page 2 of 2