Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05360/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05360-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 09-05360 VRW US_ACTIVE-103432118.1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Scott D. Baker (SBN 84923) 

Email: sbaker@reedsmith.com 

John P. Bovich (SBN 150688) 

Email: jbovich@reedsmith.com 

Jonah D. Mitchell (SBN 203511) 

Email: jmitchell@reedsmith.com 

James A. Daire (SBN 239637) 

Email: jdaire@reedsmith.com 

REED SMITH LLP

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3659 

Telephone: +1 415 543 8700 

Facsimile: +1 415 391 8269 

Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants 

Sybase, Inc. and Informatica Corporation 

Robert E. Rohde 

Washington Bar No. 12809 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

Gregory G. Schwartz 

Cal. State Bar No. 206134 

Email:gschwartz@rohdelaw.com 

ROHDE & VAN KAMPEN PLLC

1001 Fourth Ave., Suite 4050 

Seattle, WA 98154-1000 

Phone: 206-386-7349 

Fax: 206-405-2825

Michael James Cronen 

Cal. State Bar No. 22653 

Zimmerman & Cronen, LLP 

1330 Broadway, Suite 710 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Tel: (510) 465-0828 

Fax: (510) 465-2041 

Email : mcronen@zimpatent.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim 

Defendants Data Retrieval Technology LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DATA RETRIEVAL TECHNOLOGY LLC, a 

Delaware Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SYBASE, INC., a Delaware corporation, and 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, a Delaware 

Corporation, 

 Defendants 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case No. C 09-05360 VRW 

Related Case No.: C08-05481 VRW 

Related Case No.: C09-1909 VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Compl. Filed: Nov. 13, 2009 

Trial Date: N/A 

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

Case 3:09-cv-05360-JCS Document 31 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 3
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 09-05360 VRW – 1 – US_ACTIVE-103432118.1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes: 

 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process: 

X Private ADR (please identify process and provider): The parties already attempted 

to mediate this dispute as well as the related cases Nos. C08-05481 VRW and C09-1909 VRW, 

before Judge Infante on February 2, 2010 in the San Francisco JAMS office. In addition, the 

parties have agreed to reconvene with Judge Infante in approximately six months. 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

 referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

X other requested deadline: The parties request no deadline because they already 

attempted to mediate this dispute. 

DATED: March 25, 2010. REED SMITH LLP

 By: /s/ James A. Daire

 James A. Daire 

Attorneys for 

Sybase, Inc. and Informatica Corporation 

DATED: March 25, 2010. ROHDE & VAN KAMPEN PLLC 

 By: /s/ Greg G. Schwartz*

 Gregory G. Schwartz 

Attorneys for 

Data Retrieval Technology LLC 

*Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, 

James A. Daire hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 

Case 3:09-cv-05360-JCS Document 31 Filed 03/30/10 Page 2 of 3
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 09-05360 VRW – 2 – US_ACTIVE-103432118.1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

 X Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session 

 X The parties already attempted to mediate this dispute as well as related case Nos. 

C08-05481 VRW and C09-1909 VRW, before Judge Infante on February 2, 2010 in the San 

Francisco JAMS office. In addition, the parties have agreed to reconvene with Judge Infante in 

approximately six months. Accordingly, the Court declines to order an additional deadline for ADR 

in this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ________, 2010. 

By 

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

Unites States District Court Chief Judge 

3/30 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:09-cv-05360-JCS Document 31 Filed 03/30/10 Page 3 of 3