Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00022/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00022-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on September 22, 2005, as 1

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: RETURN TO SENDER: DECEASED - 5/20/05.

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT E. PAPPIN, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00022-REC-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 14)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff Albert E. Pappin, Jr. (“plaintiff”) is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On September 7, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fifteen (15)

days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:05-cv-00022-REC-LJO Document 16 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 7,

2005, is ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED for plaintiff’s failure to

obey the court’s order of July 22, 2005, and for failure to state

a claim upon which relief may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 11, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00022-REC-LJO Document 16 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2