Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228-46/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

Case No. 13-cv-00228-RMW

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR MULTIPLE RELIEF

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADIL HIRAMANEK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

L. MICHAEL CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-00228-RMW

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX 

PARTE MOTION FOR MULTIPLE 

RELIEF

(Re: Docket No. 381)

The court has ordered that any further discovery motions from any party to this case are to 

be filed as noticed motions and will be briefed on the court’s regular schedule pursuant to Civ. 

L.R. 7-2(a).1 Plaintiff Adil Hiramanek nevertheless has filed another ex parte motion for 

discovery relief.2 In part, Hiramanek asks the court to issue a third-party subpoena on Sylvia 

Sanchez as a way to obtain documents from Defendant Beth Miller. This belongs in a noticed 

motion to compel production from Miller. Similarly, Hiramanek can pursue the other relief he 

seeks in a motion to compel. Consistent with its previous order, the court DENIES the instant 

motion.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 18, 2015

_________________________________

PAUL S. GREWAL

United States Magistrate Judge

 

1

See Docket No. 340.

2

See Docket No. 381.

Case 3:13-cv-00228-JD Document 383 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 1