Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00747/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00747-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Randolph

Cregger & 25

Chalfant

26

 1

STIPULATION RE PROPER IDENTIFICATION AND CAPACITY OF DEFENDANTS

RANDOLPH, CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

THOMAS A. CREGGER, State Bar No. 124402

1030 G Street

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 443-4443

Facsimile: (916) 443-2124

Attorneys for Defendants

SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, sued herein as SACRAMENTO

CITY AND COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; ANNE MOORE,

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES BRYANT PHIFER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SACRAMENTO CITY AND COUNTY HOUSING

AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; MS. ANNE

MOORE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,

Defendants.

 /

No. 2:07-CV-0747 LKK DAD PS

STIPULATION RE PROPER

IDENT IFICATION AND

CAPACITY OF DEFENDANTS

AND ORDER

Plaintiff, JAMES BRYANT PHIFER, in pro per, and Defendants SACRAMENTO

HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, and ANNE MOORE, by and through their attorney

Thomas A. Cregger, hereby stipulate to the following facts and request that the Court issue an order

as set forth herein: 

When the Complaint was initially filed, it listed as defendants “Sacramento City and County

Housing, and Redevelopment Agency, Ms. Anne Moore, Executive Director, et al.”. 

JAMES BRYANT PHIFER has been informed by the Clerk of the Court that it considers

that three separate defendants have been named. 

At the time of the filing of the Complaint, Plaintiff JAMES BRYANT PHIFER intended

to name as defendants the SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY and

Case 2:07-cv-00747-LKK -DAD Document 29 Filed 01/23/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Randolph

Cregger & 25

Chalfant

26

 2

STIPULATION RE PROPER IDENTIFICATION AND CAPACITY OF DEFENDANTS

ANNE MOORE, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the SACRAMENTO

HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. 

To avoid any confusion with the identity or capacities of the defendants, the parties request

that the Court issue an order as follows:

1. There are two defendants in this case, being: the SACRAMENTO HOUSING &

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY and ANNE MOORE, in her official capacity as Executive

Director of the SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. 

2. That the Answer filed by defendants SACRAMENTO HOUSING &

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, sued herein as Sacramento City and County Housing and

Redevelopment Agency, and ANNE MOORE, Executive Director of SACRAMENTO HOUSING

& REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY shall be deemed to be an Answer filed on behalf the

SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY and ANNE MOORE, in her

official capacity as Executive Director of SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT

AGENCY. 

Dated: January 18, 2008 RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

/s/ Thomas A. Cregger 

THOMAS A. CREGGER

Attorneys for Defendants SACRAMENTO HOUSING &

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; ANNE MOORE,

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR of SACRAMENTO HOUSING

& REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Dated: January 18, 2008

/s/ James B. Phifer 

JAMES BRYANT PHIFER

Plaintiff in Pro Per

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 22, 2008.

Ddad1/orders.prose/phifer0747.stipord

Case 2:07-cv-00747-LKK -DAD Document 29 Filed 01/23/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Randolph

Cregger & 25

Chalfant

26

 3

STIPULATION RE PROPER IDENTIFICATION AND CAPACITY OF DEFENDANTS

PROOF OF SERVICE

CASE: James Bryant Phifer v. Sacramento City and County Housing and Redevelopment

Agency, et al.

NO: U. S. District Court, Eastern District of California, No. 2:07-CV-0747 LKK DAD PS

The undersigned declares:

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County of Sacramento. I am

over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within above-entitled action; my business address is

1030 G Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.

I am readily familiar with this law firm's practice for collection and processing of

correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service; said correspondence will be

deposited with the United States Postal Service the same day in the ordinary course of business.

On the date indicated below I served the within STIPULATION RE PROPER

IDENTIFICATION AND CAPACITY OF DEFENDANTS on all parties in said action as

addressed below by causing a true copy thereof to be:

xx placed in a sealed envelope with first class postage thereon fully

prepaid in the designated area for outgoing mail:

 delivered by hand:

 telecopied by facsimile:

 express mailed:

Plaintiff in Pro Per

James Bryant Phifer

1017 L St., PMB 124

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (302) 397-1428

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the

foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this January 18, 2008 at Sacramento, California.

 /s/ Beverly J. Murch 

Beverly J. Murch

G:\DOCS\DAD\DDAD1\ORDERS.PRO SE\phifer0747.stipord.wpd

Case 2:07-cv-00747-LKK -DAD Document 29 Filed 01/23/08 Page 3 of 3