Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-14-03396/USCOURTS-ca8-14-03396-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3396

___________________________

Detrick Lockridge

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Per Mar Security & Research Corp.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: May 6, 2015

Filed: May 13, 2015 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, BYE and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Detrick Lockridge appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary 1

judgment in his action against his former employer, in which he asserted claims of

The Honorable MichaelJ. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the District of Minnesota. 

Appellate Case: 14-3396 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/13/2015 Entry ID: 4274605 
unlawful discrimination and retaliation. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude

that the district court’s decision was correct. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643

F.3d 1031, 1042-43 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (standard of review); see also Moody

v. Vozel, 771 F.3d 1093, 1097 (8th Cir. 2014) (discussing standards applicable to

claim of discriminatory termination), petition for cert. filed, –– U.S.L.W. –– (U.S.

Apr. 23, 2015) (No. 14-1271); Alvarez v. Des Moines Bolt Supply, Inc., 626 F.3d

410, 416-18 (8th Cir. 2010) (discussing standards applicable to claim of unlawful

retaliation).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 14-3396 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/13/2015 Entry ID: 4274605