Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01710/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01710-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CECIL SHAW,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HANG YAN FOU, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:14-cv-01710-SKO

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

ACTION; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Cecil Shaw and Defendants

Hang Yan Fou, Ratha Minn, Rosa Maria Vasquez dba La Mejor Mexican Food, and Sukha 

Singh dba JCM Mini Mart #2, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, 

that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be 

dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

Date: March 3, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

 Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Cecil Shaw

Case 1:14-cv-01710-SKO Document 20 Filed 03/04/15 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Date: March 3, 2015 WILLIAMS, BRODERSEN & PRITCHETT LLP

/s/ Steven R. Williams

Steven R. Williams

Attorneys for Defendants

Hang Yan Fou, Ratha Minn, Rosa Maria Vasquez 

dba La Mejor Mexican Food, and Sukha Singh dba 

JCM Mini Mart #2

ORDER

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, 

after service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed by all of the parties 

who have appeared, although an oral stipulation in open court will also suffice. See Eitel v. 

McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1472-73 (9th Cir. 1986). 

Once the stipulation between the parties who have appeared is properly filed or made in 

open court, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal. Caselaw concerning 

stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of 

dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval. Commercial Space 

Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999).

Because the parties have filed a stipulation for dismissal of this case with prejudice 

under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) signed by all parties who have made an appearance, this case has 

terminated. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 

Clerk of the Court is to administratively close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 4, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01710-SKO Document 20 Filed 03/04/15 Page 2 of 2