Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00603/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00603-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE 

CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL CASE 

Theresa L. Pfeiffer SBN 85528 

202 University Avenue 

Los Gatos, California 95030 

Telephone: (408) 354-8384 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Tito Dhanota 

Suzanne B. Gifford SBN 34893 

General Counsel 

Richard A. Katzman SBN 91349 

Assistant General Counsel 

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority 

3331 North First Street, C-2 

San Jose, California 95134 

Telephone: (408) 321-5550 

Attorneys for Defendant Santa Clara 

Valley Transportation Authority 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

Khushvinder “Tito” Dhanota, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. C05 00603 RMW 

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF 

HEARING DATE FOR INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

 

 Plaintiff Tito Dhanota and Defendant Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority by and 

through their respective counsel, jointly ask the Court to continue the initial case management 

conference set for June 17, 2005 at 10:30 a.m. 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE 

C05 00603 RMW 

*E-FILED - 6/16/05*

Case 5:05-cv-00603-RMW Document 9 Filed 06/16/05 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE 

CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL CASE 

 The reason for the request for continuance is that all necessary parties have not yet answered, 

since two of such parties were only recently served, and the other two have not yet been served. 

The parties made an attempt to settle the case prior to the service of the other parties, and Plaintiff 

only sent the papers out for service on the other parties when the attempt to settle the matter failed. 

Thus this request for a continuance of the case management conference to a date two to three 

months away, at the Court’s convenience, when all parties will be before the Court. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: _______________________________________ 

 Theresa L. Pfeiffer 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Frank Salinas 

Dated: _______________________________________ 

 Richard A. Katzman 

 Attorney for Defendant Santa Clara Valley 

 Transportation Authority 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE 

C05 00603 RMW 

Case 5:05-cv-00603-RMW Document 9 Filed 06/16/05 Page 2 of 3
ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the initial case 

management conference in the above case is continued from June 17, 2005 at 10:30 a.m. to 

________________________________________________________ at ______________ 

before this Court. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 Ronald M. Whyte 

 Judge 

 United States District Court 

 San Jose Division 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE 

CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE 

C05 00603 RMW 

July 29, 2005 1030 a.m.

6/16/05 /s/ Ronald M. Whyte

Case 5:05-cv-00603-RMW Document 9 Filed 06/16/05 Page 3 of 3