Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02070/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02070-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Randall Bell, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-2070-PHX-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate

Judge (R&R) recommending that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with court

orders. 

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts

the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not

required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”

(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en

banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s

findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis

in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #7)

is ACCEPTED; and

Case 2:05-cv-02070-JAT Document 9 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE for failure to comply with orders of the court (See Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(b)) and

the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. 

DATED this 10th day of May, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02070-JAT Document 9 Filed 05/11/06 Page 2 of 2