Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-02728/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-02728-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CARLOS S. CAMACHO,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-02728-BLF 

ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT, 

SCHEDULING, AND CONTINUING 

TRIAL DATES

[Re: ECF 42]

Both parties in the above-captioned action have moved for summary judgment or, in the 

alternative, summary adjudication of issues. The Court heard oral argument on Defendant’s 

motion on April 22, 2015, and is scheduled to hear oral argument on Plaintiff’s motion on May 21, 

2015. 

After Plaintiff filed his motion for summary judgment, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion 

for leave to amend his Complaint to assert a new theory of liability regarding his FDCPA and 

Rosenthal Act claims. See ECF 48. In his motion for leave to amend the Complaint, Plaintiff 

requested that the Court continue dates, including the presently scheduled August 3, 2015 trial 

date, and re-open discovery in this action, in light of his new theory of liability and because he 

believed Defendant was likely to assert a bona fide error defense to this theory. On May 14, 2015, 

Defendant answered the amended complaint and asserted a bona fide error defense. ECF 58. 

On May 7, 2015, the parties appeared for case management and the Court retained the 

schedule as presently set. But in light of the current posture of the case and Plaintiff’s previous

request to modify the case schedule, the Court HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The current trial date of August 3, 2015, is CONTINUED to March 21, 2016. The 

parties will appear for a pre-trial conference on February 18, 2016 at 2:30 p.m. 

Case 5:14-cv-02728-BLF Document 59 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

2. In light of the assertion of a bona fide error defense in Defendant’s Answer, the 

Court will entertain from Plaintiff a motion to re-open fact discovery. The parties are ORDERED 

to meet and confer regarding re-opening fact discovery no later than May 29, 2015, and if they 

are unable to reach an agreement, Plaintiff may file a motion to re-open fact discovery no later 

than June 12, 2015. 

3. The May 21, 2015 hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is 

VACATED, and the motion is submitted for adjudication without oral argument pursuant to Civil 

Local Rule 7-1(b). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 15, 2015

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-02728-BLF Document 59 Filed 05/15/15 Page 2 of 2