Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-13-3826 EMC 

ORDER CLARIFYING DECEMBER 20,

2013 ORDER APPROVING PARTIES’

STIPULATION

(Docket No. 68)

On December 20, 2013, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation staying the requirement

contained in the Court’s December 6 order that the parties meet and confer regarding the form,

content, and procedure for issuance of a corrective notice. Docket No. 67. Last week, Defendants

requested the Court clarify the scope of the stay. Docket No. 68.

The Court hereby issues this clarification. The court-approved stipulation prepared by the

parties only requested the Court defer any issuance of a corrective notice. It does not stay

Defendants’ obligation to refrain from promulgating new arbitration agreements. Until a corrective

notice is approved by the Court and available for distribution or further order, that obligation shall

remain in effect.

This order disposes of Docket No. 68.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2014

_________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 69 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 1