Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02211/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02211-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN M. HALL, No. 2:13-CV-2211-KJM-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

ANTHONY GRAMMATICO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 80) for the court to set an

in-person case management conference. According to plaintiff, he has various discovery related

issues he wishes to discuss with defendants’ counsel. Plaintiff has not shown good cause for

court intervention at this time, nor has plaintiff demonstrated the need for an in-person hearing. 

Should court intervention be required to resolve a discovery dispute, plaintiff must file a written

motion pursuant to the court’s scheduling order, issued herewith. 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

1

Case 2:13-cv-02211-KJM-CMK Document 83 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 80) for an

in–person case management conference is denied. 

DATED: January 20, 2017

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:13-cv-02211-KJM-CMK Document 83 Filed 01/23/17 Page 2 of 2