Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-2_06-cv-02142/USCOURTS-arwd-2_06-cv-02142-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FORT SMITH DIVISION

CRAIG ALLEN HARRIS PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-2142

THURMAN RAGAR, JR., Public Defender;

SCOTT HOUSTON, Prosecuting Attorney;

and GARY COTTRELL, Circuit Judge DEFENDANTS

O R D E R

Now on this 11th day of December, 2006, comes on for consideration

the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6) herein and the

Plaintiffs’ Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation (Docs. 7, 9).

The Court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and

sufficiently advised, finds that the plaintiff’s objections offer

neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and

Recommendation and the same should be, and it hereby is, adopted in

toto. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report And Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge is adopted in toto and the plaintiff’s complaint is

DISMISSED on the grounds that the claims are frivolous, fail to state

claims upon which relief can be granted, are asserted against

individuals immune from suit, or are not presently cognizable under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of

Counsel (Doc. 8) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/Jimm Larry Hendren

HON. JIMM LARRY HENDREN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-02142-JLH Document 10 Filed 12/11/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>