Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01510/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01510-104/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INDIVIDUAL DEFS.’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE SECTION 17200 CLAIM

MASTER FILE NO.: C-08-01510-WHA

sf-2837012

DARRYL P. RAINS (CA SBN 104802) 

EUGENE ILLOVSKY (CA SBN 117892)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018

Telephone: 650.813.5600

Facsimile: 650.494.0792

Email: DRains@mofo.com 

CRAIG D. MARTIN (CA SBN 168195)

DOROTHY L. FERNANDEZ (CA SBN 184266)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

Attorneys for defendants The Charles Schwab Corporation, 

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Charles Schwab Investment 

Management, Inc., Schwab Investments, Charles R. Schwab, 

Evelyn Dilsaver, Randall W. Merk, George Pereira, Matthew 

Hastings, Mariann Byerwalter, Donald F. Dorward, William A. 

Hasler, Robert G. Holmes, Gerald B. Smith, Donald R. 

Stephens, and Michael W. Wilsey 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE CHARLES SCHWAB CORP. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION

Master File No. C-08-01510-WHA

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS’

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE SECTION 

17200 CLAIM

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 750 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INDIVIDUAL DEFS.’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE SECTION 17200 CLAIM 

MASTER FILE NO.: C-08-01510-WHA

sf-2837012

1

Defendants Charles R. Schwab, Evelyn Dilsaver, Randall W. Merk, George Pereira, and 

Matthew Hastings (the “Individual Defendants”) have moved the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 56, to grant them summary judgment on Count IV of plaintiffs’ Second 

Consolidated Amended Complaint, for violation of section 17200 of California Business &

Professions Code. Plaintiffs do not oppose this motion. Having considered the papers filed in connection with their Motion, the Court hereby 

GRANTS the Individual Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count IV, for 

violations of section 17200 of the California Business & Professions Code. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________, 2010

 HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

May 6

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

The hearing on Monday, May 10, 2010, at 7:30 a.m. is Vacated.

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 750 Filed 05/06/10 Page 2 of 2