Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01029/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01029-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On August 7, 2016, the plaintiff and Ford Motor Company agreed that Ford could have until 

August 26, 2016 to file its responsive pleading. (Doc. 7) Despite the passage of more than a month 

since that deadline, Ford has not responded. Despite this, the plaintiff has failed to seek a default. 

Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. Within 14 days, the plaintiff SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions should not be 

imposed for her failure to prosecute this action or, within this same 14-day period, she SHALL seek an 

entry of default as Ford Motor Company.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 4, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MCKAYLA HOLLINS,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-01029 DAD JLT

ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR 

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS ACTION

Case 1:16-cv-01029-DAD-JLT Document 18 Filed 10/04/16 Page 1 of 1