Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01058/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01058-37/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Christopher I. Simmons is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to seal documents and issue a protective 

order precluding Plaintiff from using confidential information or documentation for any purpose, filed 

April 15, 2016.

I.

DISCUSSION

Current Deputy Attorney General, Kelly A. Samson declares that on April 7, 2016, she became 

aware that a prior Deputy Attorney General had disclosed materials in the course of discovery on 

November 6, 2014, that are privileged, private, and confidential. (ECF No. 171-2, Decl. of Kelly A. 

Samson ¶ 2.) Counsel Samson declares the following:

CHRISTOPHER I. SIMMONS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

GRISSOM, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:07-cv-01058-DAD-SAB (PC)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST 

TO SEAL DOCUMENTS AND ISSUE OF 

PROTECTIVE ORDER PRECLUDING 

PLAINTIFF FROM USING INFORMATION OR 

DOCUMENTATION FOR ANY PURPOSE

[ECF No. 171]

Case 1:07-cv-01058-DAD-SAB Document 175 Filed 05/11/16 Page 1 of 5
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

After determining that these records were not part of the public record in the case that they 

referenced, Armstrong v. CDCR, 1:10-CV-01856 LJO JLT, I determined that they were 

obtained out of the Attorney General’s Office’s internal case-management system from case 

opening documents. 

These documents are not relevant or responsive to Plaintiff’s discovery request and should 

promptly be returned.

After I was assigned to represent Defendants in this action, I filed the discovery responses 

prepared by the prior counsel in support of Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to 

extend the discovery deadline, believing that the exhibits only contained complaints, which are 

public record.

The Attorney General’s Office is working in connection with the California Department of 

Corrections and Rehabilitation and the California Correctional Health Care Services, to notify 

these current and former employees of this inadvertent disclosure and filing.

Due to the sensitive nature of the information, the relationship between Plaintiff in this action 

and the employment status of the individuals whose information was disclosed, Defendants 

request that the Court issue a prompt protective order precluding Plaintiff from using this 

information for any purpose.

I prepared a letter under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B), requesting the prompt 

return of the documents identified in this request to redact and seal; and motion for protective 

order. Along with the letter, I provided plaintiff with a postage paid envelope. A copy of this 

letter will be served contemporaneously with this request. 

(ECF No. 171-2, Declaration of Kelly A. Samson ¶¶ 2-8.)

Local Rule 141.1(a)(1) states that “[a]ll information provided to the Court in a specific action 

is presumptively public, but may be sealed in conformance with Local Rule 141. Confidential 

information exchanged through discovery, contained in documents to be filed in an action, or 

presented at a hearing or trial otherwise may be protected by seeking a protective order as described 

herein.” Local Rule 141(b) states that a “Notice of Request to Seal Documents” shall be presented to 

the court for determination, setting forth the statutory or other authority for sealing, the requested 

duration, the identity, by name or category, of persons to be permitted access to the documents, and all 

other relevant information. 

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a), certain private information, such as social 

security numbers and birth-dates, must be redacted from court filings. In addition, Local Rules 140(a) 

Case 1:07-cv-01058-DAD-SAB Document 175 Filed 05/11/16 Page 2 of 5
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and 140(b) require that all dates of birth, with the exception of the year, and home addresses in 

criminal actions, be redacted in Court filings. “For good-cause, the court may by order in a case 

require reaction of additional information.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e)(1). This Court has previously 

maintained the confidentiality of CDCR employees private home addresses for service, based on the 

sensitivity of inmate litigation. See Jensen v. Knowles, 621 F.Supp.2d 921, 930-931 (E.D. Cal. 2008) 

(“If necessary to maintain the confidentiality of information provided by the CDCR pursuant to this 

Order, the Marshal may file the response under seal.”) see also Holtsinger v. Briddle, No. 

CIVS030732 MCE CMK, 2005 WL 2089846, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2005) (“The United States 

Marshal shall maintain the confidentiality of all information provided by the CDC pursuant to this 

order”); Cyprian v. Givens, No. 2:09-CV-2704 JAM JFM, 2011 WL 2225598, at *2 (E.D. Cal. June 7, 

2011) (“The U.S. Marshal shall maintain the confidentiality of any service address information 

provided by counsel for said defendants”). 

Good cause having been presented to the Court based on the information provided in the 

declaration of Deputy Attorney General, Kelly A. Samson, the documentation at ECF No. 159-3, Ex. 

2, pages. 25-511 will be sealed, and Defendants’ request for a protective order is granted in that 

Plaintiff is precluded from using the following documents for any purpose:

1. Memorandum dated June 20, 2011, to M.N., Senior Registered Nurse II, entitled “Request 

for Legal Representation/Reservation of Rights, case number 1:10-cv-01856-OWW-JLT 

(3 pages);

2. Memorandum dated June 20, 2011, to M.S., M.D., entitled “Request for Legal 

Representation/Reservation of Rights, case number 1:10-cv-01856-OWW-JLT (3 pages);

3. Memorandum dated June 20, 2011, to L.V., Registered Nurse, entitled “Request for Legal 

Representation/Reservation of Rights, case number 1:10-cv-01856-OWW-JLT (3 pages);

4. Letter dated June 20, 2011, to Supervising Deputy Attorney General M. Anderson, for 

M.S., M.D., regarding case number 1:10-cv-01856-OWW-JLT (1 page);

 

1

References herein to page numbers are to the Court’s ECF pagination headers.

Case 1:07-cv-01058-DAD-SAB Document 175 Filed 05/11/16 Page 3 of 5
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5. Letter dated June 20, 2011, to Supervising Deputy Attorney M. Anderson, for L.V., R.N., 

regarding case number 1:10-cv-01856-OWW-JLT (1 page);

6. Employee personnel information for C.A. (2 pages);

7. Employee personnel information for M.S. W-P (2 pages);

8. Employee personnel information M.N. (2 pages);

9. Employee personnel information W.D. (2 pages);

10. Employee personnel information for J.A. (2 pages);

11. Employee personnel information for I.P. (2 pages);

12. Employee personnel information for L.V. (2 pages);

13. Letter dated June 17, 2011, to Supervising Deputy Attorney General M. Anderson, 

regarding case number 1:10-cv-01918-OWW-DLB (1 page); and

14. Verification dated June 17, 2011 from KVSP litigation coordinator (1 page).

(ECF No. 159-3, Ex. 2, at pgs. 25-512.) 

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B), Plaintiff must promptly return the aboveidentified documents, all copies of these documents, and all notes, photographs and writings 

containing any of the personal data contained in these documents. In the event, Plaintiff does not 

presently have such documentation, he must explain why he does not have such documentation and 

where such documentation is located. In addition, if Plaintiff has distributed this information to any 

individuals, Plaintiff is ordered to advise counsel and the Court of the name and address of any 

individual who is in possession of the information contained in these confidential documents. 

II.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ motion to seal and issue a protective order is GRANTED; 

2. The Court shall seal the documents at ECF No. 159-3, Ex. 2, pages 25-513;

 

2

References herein to page numbers are to the Court’s ECF pagination headers.

Case 1:07-cv-01058-DAD-SAB Document 175 Filed 05/11/16 Page 4 of 5
5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. Plaintiff is precluded from using the documentation referenced above in numbers 1 

through 14 for any purpose; and

4. Within fifteen (15) days, Plaintiff shall return the above-identified documents 

referenced in numbers 1 through 14, all copies of these documents, and all notes, 

photographs and writings containing any of the personal data contained in these 

documents, if he has not already done so. In the event, Plaintiff does not presently have 

such documentation, he must explain why he does not have such documentation and 

where such documentation is located. In addition, if Plaintiff has distributed this 

information to any individuals, Plaintiff is ordered to advise counsel and the Court of 

the name and address of any individual who is in possession of the information 

contained in these confidential documents. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

 

3

References herein to page numbers are to the Court’s ECF pagination headers.

Case 1:07-cv-01058-DAD-SAB Document 175 Filed 05/11/16 Page 5 of 5