Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05897/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05897-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOWARD EALY,

Plaintiff, CV F 02 5897 AWI WMW P

vs. ORDER 

DR. ZOLLER, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on the February 18, 2005, third amended

compliant. The third amended complaint states a claim against defendants Zoller, Rhodes, Kim

and Sinclare for deliberate indifference to his medical needs, in violation of the Eighth

Amendment. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

DR. ZOLLER

DR. RHODES

DR. KIM

MTA SINCLAIR

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff four USM-285 forms, four summonses,

Case 1:02-cv-05897-AWI-WMW Document 31 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

third amended complaint filed February 18, 2005.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to

the court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Five copies of the endorsed third amended complaint filed February 18,

2005. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 29, 2005 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05897-AWI-WMW Document 31 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 2