Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06443/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06443-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTHA RIVERA, MAO HER, ALICIA

ALVAREZ, EVA ARRIOLA, PEUANG

BOUNNHONG, CHHOM CHAN, BEE

LEE, PAULA MARTINEZ, MARIA

MEDINA, MAI MEEMOUA,

MARGARITA MENDOZA, BAO NHIA

MOUA, ISIDRA MURILLO, MARIA

NAVARRO, VATH RATTANATAY,

OFELIA RIVERA, SARA RIVERA,

MARIA RODRIGUEZ, MARIA RUIZ,

MARIA VALDIVIA, SY VANG, YOUA

XIONG, and SEE YANG, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

NIBCO, INC., an Indiana corporation,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV F-99-6443 AWI SMS

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE

CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT OR SUMMARY

ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES, ETC.

Trial Date: February 14, 2006

On October 12, 2005, the parties filed the following stipulation:

1. The briefing schedule relating to the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment

or summary adjudication of issues currently requires that opposition briefs be filed on or before

October 21, 2005; that reply briefs be filed on or before November 4, 2005; and that the motions

be heard on November 21, 2005.

2. In view of the scheduling considerations of counsel for both parties, the parties

stipulate that the above schedule may be modified so that the parties’ opposition briefs are to be

filed on or before October 28, 2005; that reply briefs are to be filed on or before November 18,

2005; and that the cross-motions will be heard on December 5, 2005.

3. The parties further stipulate that the hearing on plaintiffs’ pending motion for

separate trial of plaintiffs’ claims for backpay, currently set for November 21, 2005, be reset to

Case 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Document 321 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 3
December 5, 2005, in order to coincide with the hearing on the cross-motions for summary

judgment.

4. The parties further stipulate that the date for initial damages expert disclosures,

currently set for October 17, 2005, be extended to October 24, 2005, and that the date for

supplemental damages expert disclosures, currently set for November 11, 2005, be extended to

November 14, 2005.

Dated: October 12, 2005 Respectfully submitted,

Christopher Ho

William N. Nguyen

Lewis Bossing

The LEGAL AID SOCIETY – 

 EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER

William J. Smith

Tina R. Griffin

W.J. SMITH & ASSOCIATES

Marielena Hincapié

NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER

Joannie C. Chang

ASIAN LAW CAUCUS

Lisa Duarte

MINAMI, LEW & TAMAKI LLP

By: /S/ Christopher Ho 

CHRISTOPHER HO

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: October 12, 2005 SAGASER, JONES & HAHESY

 By: /S/ William Hahesy 

 William Hahesy

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Document 321 Filed 10/19/05 Page 2 of 3
ORDER

Good cause appearing, the parties’ opposition briefs regarding their cross-motions for

summary judgment shall be filed on or before October 28, 2005; reply briefs shall be filed on or

before November 18, 2005; and the cross-motions shall be heard on December 5, 2005. The

hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for separate trial of plaintiffs’ claims for backpay, currently set for

November 21, 2005, shall be reset to December 5, 2005. The date for initial damages expert

disclosures, currently set for October 17, 2005, shall be reset to October 24, 2005, and the date

for supplemental damages expert disclosures, currently set for November 11, 2005, be extended

to November 14, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 18, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Document 321 Filed 10/19/05 Page 3 of 3