Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02658/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02658-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY—No. C-08-02658 RMW

CCL

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 5/10/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MANDANA D. FARHANG and M.A.

MOBILE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,

KHARAGPUR; TECHNOLOGY

ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND TRAINING

SOCIETY; PARTHA P. CHAKRABARTI;

PALLAB DASGUPTA; GURASHISH S.

BRAR; RAKESH GUPTA; PRAVANJAN

CHOUDHURY; SUBRAT PANDA;

ANIMESH NASKAR,

Defendants.

No. C-08-02658 RMW

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY

[Re Docket No. 128]

The court has received the parties' proposals for limited discovery pending the outcome of

defendants' motions. The court notes that plaintiffs have failed to specify when they anticipate that

all defendants will have been served, despite the court's order to do so. The court hereby orders the

following:

1. Plaintiffs shall serve defendants with a trade secret disclosure list, identifying the

trade secrets at issue pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2019.210, within 14 days of

this order. 

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 135 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY—No. C-08-02658 RMW

CCL 2

2. The parties shall exchange their Rule 26 Initial Disclosures within 30 days after the

trade secret disclosure list has been served. 

3. All other discovery is stayed until the court rules on the various motions currently

pending. See Dkt. Nos. 112, 120, 124, 126. 

DATED: 5/10/10

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 135 Filed 05/10/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY—No. C-08-02658 RMW

CCL 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

Micah R. Jacobs mjacobs@mbvlaw.com 

Counsel for Defendant IIT:

I. Neel Chatterjee nchatterjee@orrick.com 

Nitin Gambhir ngambhir@orrick.com 

Theresa Ann Sutton tsutton@orrick.com 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 5/10/10 CCL

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 135 Filed 05/10/10 Page 3 of 3