Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01116/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01116-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 625
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 498-5700

Attorney for Claimant

DALE R. FRISBEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12711

HIGHWAY 89, SIERRAVILLE,

CALIFORNIA, SIERRA COUNTY, APN: 

018-050-03,

Defendant.

_______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 2:10-CV-01116 MCE-KJM

STIPULATION AND ORDER APPOINTING

COUNSEL FOR CLAIMANT DALE FRISBEY

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States

of America, and claimant, Dale Frisbey, as follows:

1. On November 20, 2009, the Magistrate Judge appointed the Office

of the Federal Defender to represent Dale R. Frisbey in United States v.

Frisbey et al., 2:09-CR-0513, to which the above case has been ordered

related. Mr. Frisbey submitted a financial affidavit demonstrating that

he was indigent and therefore financially unable to obtain representation

by counsel.

Case 2:10-cv-01116-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. & Order -2-

2. On May 5, 2010, the United States filed a verified complaint for

forfeiture in rem against the above property in Plumas County,

California.

3. Section 983(b)(1)(A) of Title 18, United States Code, provides:

If a person with standing to contest the forfeiture of property

in a civil judicial forfeiture proceeding under a civil

forfeiture statute is financially unable to obtain

representation by counsel, and the person is represented by

counsel appointed under section 3006A of this title in

connection with a related criminal case, the court may

authorize counsel to represent that person with respect to the

claim.

4. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 983(b)(1)(A), Mr. Frisbey asks the Court

to authorize the Federal Defender to represent him in the above

forfeiture case.

5. The United States has no objection to the appointment of the

Federal Defender as counsel. Since there has not been any discovery

undertaken in the case, the United States reserves the right oppose Dale

Frisbey’s claim and/or answer for any lack of standing on his part to

contest the forfeiture of property in a civil judicial forfeiture

proceeding under a civil forfeiture statute.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

Dated: June 24, 2010 /s/ T. Zindel 

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for DALE R. FRISBEY

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Dated: June 24, 2010 /s/ S. Ang-Olson 

SARALYN M. ANG-OLSON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Case 2:10-cv-01116-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 06/25/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. & Order -3-

O R D E R

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 983(b)(1)(A), the Office of the Federal

Defender is hereby authorized to represent Dale R. Frisbey in the above

case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 25, 2010

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-01116-MCE-EFB Document 13 Filed 06/25/10 Page 3 of 3