Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01810/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01810-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

QUIANA LA NAY CHASE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 16-cv-01810-JSW 

ORDER RE CONSENT 

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to 

reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. 

See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). Defendant has filed a notice that she consents to having this action tried 

before a Magistrate Judge for all purposes. Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY DIRECTED to 

advise the Court, no later than July 22, 2016, as to whether she consents to have a magistrate judge 

conduct all further proceedings in the instant action.1 Consent forms are available at 

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

 

1

 Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint case 

management statement filed in connection with a joint case management conference. Because the 

instant action involves review of an administrative record, however, a case management 

conference has not been scheduled. 

Case 4:16-cv-01810-JSW Document 12 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ma

Da

 

2

 

Ch

The par

agistrate judg

IT IS S

ated: July 15,

 

The Co

ase v. Comm

rties are furth

ge.

2

SO ORDER

, 2016. 

 

ourt notes tha

missioner, 13

her advised 

RED. 

 

at Plaintiff h

3-cv-1816. 

2

that they ma

___

JEF

Un

had a prior ca

ay jointly req

__________

FFREY S. W

nited States D

ase pending 

quest assignm

___________

WHITE 

District Judg

before Magi

ment to a sp

__________

ge 

istrate Judge

pecific 

________ 

 Westmore,

Case 4:16-cv-01810-JSW Document 12 Filed 07/15/16 Page 2 of 2