Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00986/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00986-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOVA MEASURING INSTRUMENTS LTD.,

Plaintiff

 v.

NANOMETRICS INC.,

Defendant /

No. C 05-0986 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On May 1, 2006, plaintiff, on behalf of both parties, electronically filed the Joint Claim

Construction Statement. Plaintiff has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing

Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the

business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of

each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly

marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See

General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the Court’s

Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court

Case 3:05-cv-00986-MMC Document 142 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 9, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00986-MMC Document 142 Filed 05/09/06 Page 2 of 2