Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-01299/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-01299-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEPEHR TORABI,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO.12cv1299-WQHBLM

vs. ORDER

DEUTSCHE BANK, CITIBANK, and

DOES 1-2, inclusive,

Defendants.

HAYES, Judge: 

On May 30, 2012, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Complaint in this

Court. (ECF No. 1). On July 9, 2013, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. 

(ECF No. 18). On November 5, 2013, the Court issued an Order stating that it would

dismiss the action without prejudice as to Defendants Deutsche Bank and Citibank on

November 25, 2013, unless, before that date, Plaintiff files proof that service of the First

Amended Complaint was effectuated upon Defendants Deutsche Bank and Citibank. 

(ECF No. 24). On November 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed certificates of service indicating

that Defendants Deutsche Bank and Citibank were both served via mail. (ECF Nos. 25,

26). The docket reflects that no action has been taken by Plaintiff in this case since

November 25, 2013. 

- 1 - 13cv1299-WQH-BLM

Case 3:12-cv-01299-WQH-BLM Document 30 Filed 07/01/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On May 29, this Court issued an Order stating: 

Pursuant to Local Rule 41.1, “[a]ctions or proceedings which have been pending in this court for more than six months, without any proceeding or discovery having been taken therein during such period, may, after notice, be dismissed by the court for want of prosecution.” S.D. Cal. Civ. Local

Rule 41.1; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). It appearing to the Court that dismissal for want of prosecution may be appropriate in this case, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Plaintiff shall file a written response to this ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

no later than twenty-one (21) days from the date this Order is filed. If

Plaintiff does not respond, the Court will dismiss this case without

prejudice.

(ECF No. 29 at 1-2). To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the Order to Show

Cause. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without

prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. 

DATED: July 1, 2014

WILLIAM Q. HAYES

United States District Judge

- 2 - 13cv1299-WQH-BLM

Case 3:12-cv-01299-WQH-BLM Document 30 Filed 07/01/14 Page 2 of 2