Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00796/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00796-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERNEST MILLER,

Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-0796-JFM (PC)

vs.

K. TERRY, et al., ORDER AND

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. By an order filed July 21, 2010, this court found that on at least three

occasions lawsuits filed by plaintiff have been dismissed on the grounds that they were frivolous

or malicious or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and, therefore, that

plaintiff was precluded from proceeding with this action in forma pauperis unless he is “under

imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The court further found that

plaintiff has not alleged any facts which suggest that he faces such danger. Accordingly, the

court ordered plaintiff to pay the appropriate filing fee for this action within twenty days. 

On August 4, 2010, plaintiff filed objections to the July 21, 2010 order, and on

August 5, 2010, plaintiff filed a document styled as a motion for injunctive relief precluding 

/////

Case 2:10-cv-00796-GEB -JFM Document 14 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

enforcement of the order. Neither has merit. The twenty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not paid the filing fee as required by the court’s July 21, 2010 order. 

Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of

the Court is directed to assign this action to a United States District Judge; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served

within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 9, 2010.

12

mill0796.fpf

Case 2:10-cv-00796-GEB -JFM Document 14 Filed 08/10/10 Page 2 of 2