Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_02-cv-05193/USCOURTS-arwd-5_02-cv-05193-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

YORAM RAZ PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 02-5184

ROBERT MUELLER, FBI DIRECTOR DEFENDANT

and

YORAM RAZ PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 02-5193

UNITED STATES DEFENDANT

O R D E R

Now on this 2 day of September, 2005, come on for nd

consideration the following motions pending in case number 02-

5193:

* plaintiff’s Motion To Compel Defendants To Answer

Revised Interrogatory 21 And Request For Production 26

(document #192);

* defendants’ Motion In Limine To Bar Testimony Regarding

Any Damages Related To The October 2, 2004, Incident In

Jay, Oklahoma (document #199);

* defendants’ Motion In Limine Seeking Clarification As To

The Status Of Claims Against Defendant, FBI Director

Robert Mueller, Or In The Alternative, For Summary

Judgment (document #201); and

* plaintiff’s Urgent Motion To Reconsider Rule 50(a)

Case 5:02-cv-05193-JLH Document 204 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: <pageID>
-2-

Dismissal (document #202),

and with regard to those motions, the Court finds and orders as

follows:

The captioned cases were brought on the basis of essentially

the same factual allegations, although they sought different

relief against different parties. During the discovery phase of

the cases, they were consolidated for purposes of discovery only.

On the first day of trial, July 18, 2005, they were consolidated

for all purposes. The consolidated case then proceeded to trial

as case number 02-5184.

The Court has today entered a Memorandum Opinion And Order,

three additional Orders, and a Judgment, disposing of all pending

issues in the consolidated case. It has come to the attention of

the Court, however, that the motions listed above, which were

pending in case number 02-5193 under separate docket entry

numbers, appear (on the face of the docket) to remain unresolved.

That is not the case. All issues in these motions are addressed

and resolved in the Memorandum Opinion And Order, the additional

three Orders, and the Judgment entered this date in 02-5184. In

order to clarify the record, the Court enters this Order,

disposing of the motions in the manner stated below, for the

reasons set forth in the Orders and Memorandum Opinion And Order

and Judgment entered this date.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion To Compel

Case 5:02-cv-05193-JLH Document 204 Filed 09/02/05 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: <pageID>
-3-

Defendants To Answer Revised Interrogatory 21 And Request For

Production 26 (document #192) is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ Motion In Limine To

Bar Testimony Regarding Any Damages Related To The October 2,

2004, Incident In Jay, Oklahoma (document #199) is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ Motion In Limine

Seeking Clarification As To The Status Of Claims Against

Defendant, FBI Director Robert Mueller, Or In The Alternative, For

Summary Judgment (document #201) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s Urgent Motion To

Reconsider Rule 50(a) Dismissal (document #202) is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims in case number

02-5193 are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren 

JIMM LARRY HENDREN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:02-cv-05193-JLH Document 204 Filed 09/02/05 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: <pageID>