Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03709/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03709-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

DEADLINE TO PRESENT DISCOVERY ISSUES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

 Paul H. Dawes (Bar No. 55191) 

 Jay L. Pomerantz (Bar No. 209869) 

 John C. Tang (Bar No. 212371) 

 Michele D. Johnson (Bar No. 198298) 

 Kalama Lui-Kwan (Bar No. 242121) 

 Peter T. Snow (Bar No. 222117) 

140 Scott Drive 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 328-4600 

Facsimile: (650) 463-2600

Counsel For CV Therapeutics, Inc. and 

the Individual Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re CV THERAPEUTICS, INC. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: All Actions 

Master File No. C-03-3709-SI 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE: DEADLINE TO PRESENT DISCOVERY 

ISSUES 

WHEREAS, the Court’s April 3, 2006 Order Re: Discovery Motions (the “Discovery 

Order”) ordered Defendants to produce documents from six specific sources; 

WHEREAS, on June 2 and 9, 2006, Defendants produced a substantial number of 

documents pursuant to the Discovery Order; 

WHEREAS, the parties have been meeting and conferring regarding the timing and scope 

of Defendants’ production of any additional documents pursuant to the Discovery Order; 

WHEREAS, during the June 2, 2006 Case Management Conference, the Court ordered 

that discovery issues shall be presented to the Court by letter brief by June 16, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties just received important information and data from Defendants’ 

document vendor relevant to their ongoing meet and confer; 

WHEREAS, the parties believe that they will be unable to fully consider the information 

and data received from Defendants’ document vendor and complete their meet and confer 

Case 3:03-cv-03709-SI Document 320 Filed 06/16/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-03709-SI Document 322 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

DEADLINE TO PRESENT DISCOVERY ISSUES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

regarding Defendants’ production of documents pursuant to the Discovery Order by the June 16, 

2006 deadline to present discovery issues to the Court; 

WHEREAS, the parties believe that extending the deadline to present any issues 

related to Defendants’ production of documents pursuant to the Discovery Order would promote 

the most efficient use of the Court’s and the parties’ resources by providing the parties additional 

time to potentially resolve issues that would otherwise have to be submitted to the Court; 

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, and request the Court to order, that the 

deadline to present any issues related to Defendants’ production of documents, as set forth in the 

Court’s June 7, 2006 Minute Order, shall be extended to July 7, 2006. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 16, 2006 LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

 /S/ 

Jeffrey D. Friedman 

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

100 Pine Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

T: 415/288-4545 

F: 415/288-4534 

Dated: June 16, 2006 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

 /S/ 

Peter T. Snow 

Counsel for Defendants 

140 Scott Drive 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

T: 650/328-4600 

F: 650/463-2600 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B regarding signatures, I attest 

under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from 

Jeffrey D. Friedman. 

Case 3:03-cv-03709-SI Document 320 Filed 06/16/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-03709-SI Document 322 Filed 06/16/06 Page 2 of 3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

DEADLINE TO PRESENT DISCOVERY ISSUES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

* * * 

ORDER 

 Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ 

The Honorable Susan Illston 

United States District Judge 

 SV\510237.1 

Case 3:03-cv-03709-SI Document 320 Filed 06/16/2006 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-03709-SI Document 322 Filed 06/16/06 Page 3 of 3