Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05696/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05696-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEANDRE BROWN, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF )

CALIFORNIA, )

)

)

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:04-cv-05696-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 25)

ORDER DENYING AMENDED PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 8)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On May 13, 2004, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254 in this Court.

On September 28, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED on the

merits. (Doc. 25). This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained

notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of that

order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

Case 1:04-cv-05696-OWW -TAG Document 27 Filed 11/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed September 28, 2007 (Doc. 25), is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Th amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 8), is DENIED with

prejudice; and,

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 6, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05696-OWW -TAG Document 27 Filed 11/07/07 Page 2 of 2