Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01451/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01451-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO CORTEZ BUCKLEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-1451 DFL KJM P

vs.

EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, JR., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 23, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed May 10, 2005, denying petitioner’s April 29, 2005 motion to compel. 

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed May 10, 2005 is affirmed. 

DATED: 9/26/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:02-cv-01451-JKS-KJM Document 76 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:02-cv-01451-JKS-KJM Document 76 Filed 09/27/05 Page 2 of 2