Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00046/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00046-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TYRRALL F. CANNON, No. CIV-S-05-0046 MCE/DAD P

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On August 29, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:05-cv-00046-MCE -DAD Document 18 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations. In addition, plaintiff has filed a request for

a three-judge panel and a request to add as defendants three

individuals whose positions are not described, the National Rifle

Association, the California Correctional Peace Officers

Association, the Attorney General for the State of California,

the California Commission on Judicial Performance, and an

unspecified number of persons whose names are not provided. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s September 15, 2005 request to add defendants

is denied;

2. Plaintiff’s September 15, 2005 request for a three-judge

panel is denied;

3. The findings and recommendations filed August 29, 2005,

are adopted in full; 

4. Plaintiff’s January 10, 2005 motion to proceed in forma

pauperis is denied; and 

///

///

///

///

Case 2:05-cv-00046-MCE -DAD Document 18 Filed 09/28/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

5. All claims alleged in this action are dismissed without

prejudice to pursuit in the proper form of action in the proper

court.

DATED: September 28, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00046-MCE -DAD Document 18 Filed 09/28/05 Page 3 of 3