Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00949/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00949-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERENCE BROWNLEE, )

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

A.P. KANE, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

)

No. CV-F-05-949 OWW

ORDER FOLLOWING NINTH

CIRCUIT LIMITED REMAND

DECLINING TO ISSUE

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 

The court hereby declines to issue a certificate of

appealability in connection with Petitioner's appeal of the

denial of his motion to set aside ruling pursuant to Rule

60(b)(3), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Petitioner's motion was denied for lack of jurisdiction as a

second or successive Section 2254 motion not authorized by the

Ninth Circuit. Petitioner's claim for fraud pursuant to Rule

60(b)(3) and Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524 (2005) is not based

on any defect in the prior habeas corpus proceedings. 

Petitioner has not made a showing that jurists of reason

Case 1:05-cv-00949-OWW -SMS Document 32 Filed 07/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

would find it debatable that the motion states a valid claim for

denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would

find it debatable that the court was correct in its procedural

ruling.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00949-OWW -SMS Document 32 Filed 07/06/07 Page 2 of 2