Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01695/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01695-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA m 

YASIR MEHMOOD,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL CHAVEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-1695 JAM CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a federal pretrial detainee proceeding pro se with a complaint pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On October 26, 2015, plaintiff’s original complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff 

was granted leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff’s amended complaint is 

now before the court for screening. (ECF No. 14.) See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). 

The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that 

are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or 

that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 

1915A(b)(1), (2). Having reviewed the amended complaint, the undersigned concludes that it 

fails to cure the defects of the original complaint, discussed in the October 26, 2015 screening 

order, or state a claim for relief against any defendant. Because it appears that another round of 

amendment would be futile, the undersigned will recommend dismissal of this action.

////

Case 2:15-cv-01695-KJM-CKD Document 15 Filed 05/23/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with 

prejudice and this case closed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: May 20, 2016

2 / mehm1695.fac_fr

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-01695-KJM-CKD Document 15 Filed 05/23/16 Page 2 of 2