Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03624/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03624-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

ADR Stip & Order 1 n:\lit\li2007\070567\00440885.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ESTATE OF NICHOLAS TORRICO 

deceased, BONNIE JEAN TORRICO 

individually and as successor in interest to 

the Estate Of Nicholas Torrico and

CARLOS TORRICO, individually and as 

successor in interest to the ESTATE OF 

NICHOLAS TORRICO, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, VICTOR WYRSCH and 

JOANNE HAYES-WHITE in her official 

capacity as Chief of the San Francisco 

Fire Department, and DOES 1 through 20,

 Defendants. 

Case No. 07-CV-03624-JCS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

 The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

 Court Processes: 

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

 (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR 

phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone 

Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

 Private Process: 

 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ 

_____________________________________________________________________________

USDC No.:07-03624-JCS

Case 3:07-cv-03624-JCS Document 12 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 2
ADR Stip & Order 2 n:\lit\li2007\070567\00440885.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

 other requested deadline: Upon completion of fact discovery.

Dated: October 1, 2007 /s/ Michael D. Meadows 

 Michael D. Meadows 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: October 1, 2007 /s/ Kimberly A. Bliss

 Kimberly A. Bliss 

 Attorney for Defendants

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

 Non-binding Arbitration 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 

 Mediation 

 Private ADR 

 Deadline for ADR session 

 90 days from the date of this order. 

 other ___________________ 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:________________ ___________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

USDC No.:07-03624-JCS

X

10/2/7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:07-cv-03624-JCS Document 12 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 2