Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01910/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01910-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1910

YURI J. STOYANOV,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES BEHRLE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as 

the Head of the Carderock Division; GARY M. JEBSEN, 

Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of 

Code 70; KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in his Official 

Capacity as the Head of Code 74; BRUCE CROCK, Individually 

and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 743; DAVID 

CARON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as 

Assistant Counsel Code 39; CATHERINE KISSMEIER, Individually 

and in her Official Capacity as Counsel Code 40; GARTH 

JENSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy 

Head Code 70; MARY (CATHY) FOWLER, Individually and in her 

Official Capacity as Administrative Officer Code 70; KENNETH 

FORMAN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of 

Code 73; KENNETH GOLDMAN, Individually and in his Official 

Capacity as Head of Code 71; ARCHER MACY, Individually and 

in His Official Capacity as the Head of Naval Surface 

Warfare Center; RAY MABUS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District 

Judge. (1:07-cv-01985-DKC)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 16-1910 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1910 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Yuri J. Stoyanov appeals the district court’s orders

entered after the district court dismissed Stoyanov’s claims 

against Defendants, including claims brought pursuant to Title 

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and the Age Discrimination in 

Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See

Stoyanov v. Behrle, No. 1:07-cv-01985-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2015 

& June 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1910 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 3 of 3