Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

DECHERT LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDERTO EXTEND MEDIATION DEADLINE; CASE NO: C-04-03923 MMC 1

9393236.1

Chris Scott Graham (State Bar No. 114498)

chris.scott.graham@dechert.com

Michael N. Edelman (State Bar No. 180948)

michael.edelman@dechert.com

DECHERT LLP

1117 California Avenue

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1106

Telephone: 650.813.4800

Facsimile: 650.813.4848

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,

SYNOPSYS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,

v.

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, a 

Delaware corporation,

Defendant and Counter-Claimant.

Case No. C-04-03923 MMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND MEDIATION

DEADLINE

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 140 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 2
DECHERT LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDERTO EXTEND MEDIATION DEADLINE; CASE NO: C-04-03923 MMC 2

9393236.1

WHEREAS, the current deadline for conducting mediation in this case is May 21, 2005; 

and

WHEREAS, the parties believe that mediation would not be productive at this time; 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the 

parties, through their counsel of record, to extend the deadline to conduct mediation to July 21, 

2005.

Dated: May 20, 2005 DECHERT LLP

By:/s/Chris Scott Graham

Chris Scott Graham

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,

SYNOPSYS, INC.

Dated: May 20, 2005 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By:/s/George Riley

George Riley

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant,

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____________________, 2005

_________________________________

United States District Court Judge

June 2

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 140 Filed 06/03/05 Page 2 of 2