Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-01995/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-01995-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4816-8911-1549.1 Case No. 2:20-cv-01995-KJM-DMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BETTY ABBIE, individually and as 

successor-in-interest and as successor- in-interest; AARON ABBIE, individually and as successor-in- interest; and, AMANDA VARNER, 

individually and as successor-in- interest,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SHASTA COUNTY, a public entity,

SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF

DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF TOM

BOSENKO, an Individual;

CAPTAIN DAVE KENT, an 

Individual; DEPUTY VAN GERWEN, an Individual; DEPUTY VORHIS, an Individual; DEPUTY SCHRITTER, an Individual and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:20-cv-01995-KJM-DMC

District Judge, Kimberly J. Mueller; Magistrate Judge, Dennis M. Cota

ORDER CONTINUING COURT'S 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

DEADLINES

///

///s

Case 2:20-cv-01995-DC-DMC Document 62 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4816-8911-1549.1 2 Case No. 2:20-cv-01995-KJM-DMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, and pursuant to 

the Court’s inherent and statutory authority, including but not limited to the Court’s 

authority under the applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the United States 

District Court, Eastern District of California Local Rules; after due consideration of 

all of the relevant pleadings, papers, and records in this action; and upon such other 

evidence or argument as was presented to the Court; Good Cause appearing therefor, 

and in furtherance of the interests of justice, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court hereby orders that the operative scheduling order deadlines 

[see Doc. 33, 45, 47] are continued as follows:

 2. Except as specified herein above, all other dates and deadlines operative 

as of the Court’s prior scheduling order [e.g. Doc. 33, 45, 47] shall remain unchanged

and unaffected by the parties’ stipulation. 

///

///

EVENT CURRENT DEADLINE NEW DEADLINE

Initial Expert 

Disclosures

01/31/23 04/28/23

Rebuttal Expert 

Disclosures

02/28/23 05/30/23

Non-Expert Discovery 

Cut-Off

01/17/23 04/18/23

Expert Discovery CutOff04/28/23 07/28/23

MSJ Hearing Deadline 08/04/23 11/03/23

Settlement Conference 05/11/23 08/10/23

Case 2:20-cv-01995-DC-DMC Document 62 Filed 10/24/22 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4816-8911-1549.1 3 Case No. 2:20-cv-01995-KJM-DMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2022

________________________________

____

DENNIS M. COTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE

Case 2:20-cv-01995-DC-DMC Document 62 Filed 10/24/22 Page 3 of 3