Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01792/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01792-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARLENE PEREZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOHN MUIR HEALTH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-01792-HSG 

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO 

CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING 

ORDER

Re: Dkt. Nos. 71, 73

Pending before the Court are two motions brought by Plaintiffs Marlene Perez and Rosa 

Cerisano: (1) motion to continue the hearing date on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, 

Dkt. No. 71, and (2) motion to modify the scheduling order, Dkt. No. 73. The court heard oral 

argument on the motions on April 14, 2016. 

As stated on the record during the hearing, the Court sets May 14, 2016, as the deadline by 

which all discovery must be completed. The parties are ORDERED to fully frame any remaining

discovery disputes early enough such that Magistrate Judge James can resolve all disputes, and all 

discovery can be completed, prior to the May 14, 2016, deadline. This is the parties’ 

responsibility: waiting until near the deadline to bring issues to Judge James’s attention will not 

excuse a failure to fully complete discovery by May 14. Further, absent extraordinary 

circumstances, the parties are precluded from raising any new discovery disputes that were not 

brought to Judge James’s attention prior to the March 29, 2016, deadline to bring motions to 

compel.

The parties shall not issue any further written discovery in this action.

Plaintiffs seek to reopen three depositions and take one additional deposition in excess of 

the ten deposition limit. Dkt. No. 73 at 5. Plaintiffs are not permitted to reopen or notice the four 

Case 4:15-cv-01792-HSG Document 82 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

depositions in dispute absent prior leave from Judge James. 

The remainder of the scheduling order is as follows:

Event Date

Deadline to File Oppositions to Dispositive 

Motions

May 26, 2016

Deadline to File Replies in Support of Dispositive 

Motions

June 2, 2016

Deadline to Exchange Initial Expert Reports June 13, 2016

Deadline for Hearing on Dispositive Motion June 16, 2016 — 2:00 p.m.

Expert Discovery Cutoff June 24, 2016

Pretrial Conference August 2, 2016 — 3:00 p.m.

Jury Trial August 22, 2016 — 8:30 

a.m. / 10 days

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 4/18/2016

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cv-01792-HSG Document 82 Filed 04/18/16 Page 2 of 2