Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01438/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01438-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIA DOE, a fictitious name; CLARA 

DOE, a fictitious name, and “I.D.,” a 

fictitious name, by and through her next 

friend, MARIA DOE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

OFFICE; DARRYL RODERICK; 

JAGDEEP SINGH, individually and as 

administrator of the Estate of Sushma 

Giri; V & N ASSOCIATES, LLC; and 

ALIDA ESTRADA, 

Defendants.

No. 2:21-cv-01438-MCE-CKD

ORDER

On September 15, 2022, this Court filed an order that, among other things, 

dismissed Plaintiffs’ third and fourth causes of action with leave to amend. The Court 

advised Plaintiffs that if no amended complaint was timely filed, those causes of action 

would be deemed dismissed with prejudice upon no further notice to the parties. 

///

///

///

///

Case 2:21-cv-01438-DC-CKD Document 35 Filed 10/19/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

No amended pleading has been filed. Accordingly, the third and fourth causes of 

action set forth in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint are hereby DISMISSED with 

prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 19, 2022

Case 2:21-cv-01438-DC-CKD Document 35 Filed 10/19/22 Page 2 of 2