Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03717/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03717-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND 

CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER

 (No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

Terrence P. McMahon (State Bar No. 71910) 

tmcmahon@mwe.com 

Anthony de Alcuaz (State Bar No. 65599) 

adealcuaz@mwe.com 

Robert J. Blanch (State Bar No. 189632) 

rblanch@mwe.com 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: 650.813.5000 

Facsimile: 650.813.5100 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES 

AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED and 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Jeffrey S. Love (State Bar No. 195068) 

jeffrey.love@klarquist.com 

Samir N. Pandya (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

samir.pandya@klarquist.com 

Garth A. Winn (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

garth.winn@klarquist.com 

KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 

121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 

Portland, OR 97204-2988 

Telephone: 503.595.5300 

Facsimile: 503.595.5301 

Eric L. Wesenberg (State Bar No. 139696) 

ewesenberg@orrick.com 

Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015 

Telephone: (650) 614-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY 

and Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff IGT 

Complete list on signature page (L.R. 3-4(a)) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 1 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER 

 (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES 

AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED AND 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

INTERNATIONAL GAME 

TECHNOLOGY, 

Defendant, 

and IGT, 

Defendant and 

Counterclaimant-Plaintiff.

CASE NO. C-06-03717-MJJ 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER 

Department: Room 11, 19th floor, SF 

Judge: Martin J. Jenkins 

This Stipulated [Proposed] Protective and Confidentiality Order (“Order”) is entered into 

between Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited and 

Aristocrat Technologies, Inc., on the one hand, and Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs 

International Game Technology and IGT, on the other hand, to address the confidentiality of 

certain materials produced or to be produced by the parties and non-parties in this action. 

It is hereby stipulated and agreed that: 

1. “Confidential” material shall be defined as any information, document or thing 

produced in connection with this litigation including, without limitation, any information, 

document or thing produced by parties and third parties pursuant to subpoena or agreement in 

connection with this litigation, that is reasonably believed by the designating party to be nonpublic. 

2. “Highly Confidential” material shall be defined as any information, document or 

thing produced in connection with this litigation, including, without limitation, any information, 

document or thing produced by parties and third parties pursuant to subpoena or agreement in 

connection with this litigation, that is reasonably believed by the producing party to be 

competitively sensitive and/or a trade secret as defined in Nevada Revised Statue 600A.030. 

Materials comprising or containing source code produced by the parties shall be considered 

“Highly Confidential” material. Only those persons authorized to receive “Highly Confidential” 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 2 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 2 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-2- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

information and review source code under paragraph 7 below will be permitted access to the 

source code. The party disclosing the source code will produce paper copies of a reasonable 

number of relevant portions of the source code, but no electronic copies of the code will be 

produced. The non-disclosing party may make working paper copies of the source code, 

however, no electronic copies of the paper copies of the source code may be made. The nondisclosing party may share working paper copies of the source code with individuals authorized 

under paragraph 7 (except in-house counsel). After settlement or adjudication of this action the 

provisions of paragraph 16 below shall be complied with as to source code material. 

3. As used herein, “Confidential” and “Highly Confidential” material may include (a) 

all papers, tapes, documents (including responses to interrogatories, requests for admission or 

document requests), disks, diskettes, e-mails, and other tangible things produced by or obtained 

from any person in connection with this litigation; (b) transcripts of depositions herein and 

exhibits thereto; and (c) all copies, extracts, and complete or partial summaries prepared from 

such papers, documents or things. 

4. Documents shall be designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” by (i) 

marking or stamping each page of any such document “Confidential” or “highly Confidential”; or 

(ii) designating a document depository or other location in which documents are maintained as 

containing only “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” information. In lieu of marking the 

originals of documents, any party may mark the copies of such documents that are produced or 

exchanged. Each party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this 

Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualified under the 

appropriate standards, including FRCP Rule 26(c). Counsel for each party shall not designate any 

discovery material “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” without first making a good faith 

determination that protection is warranted. A designating or producing party must take care to 

designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written 

communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or 

communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the 

ambit of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 3 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 3 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-3- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

If it comes to a party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items that it 

designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of 

protection initially asserted, that party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is 

withdrawing the mistaken designation. 

5. “Confidential” and “Highly Confidential” material shall be used subject to the 

terms of this Order and solely in connection with, and only as necessary to, this litigation and the 

preparation and trial of this case, or any related appellate proceeding, and not for any other 

purpose, including any business, competitive or governmental purpose or function. 

6. “Confidential” material shall not be discussed with, shown, described or disclosed 

(hereinafter, collectively “Disclosed”) to any person other than (a) persons to whom the 

producing party previously has disclosed such discovery material and (b) the following persons, 

as to whom disclosure shall be limited to the extent reasonably necessary for the prosecution, 

defense, and/or appeal of this action: 

a. The Court, persons employed by the Court, jurors or potential jurors in this 

case or any appeal therefrom, and stenographers or videographers 

transcribing or recording the testimony or argument at hearing, trial or 

deposition in this action or any appeal therefrom; 

b. Counsel of record for the parties to this action, including in-house counsel, 

associates, legal assistants, paralegals, secretarial and clerical employees, 

and outside vendors providing services to such counsel (including without 

limitation, copy services, litigation consulting services, document 

management services and graphic services); 

c. Independent experts or consultants retained, employed or informally 

consulted by counsel or a party in connection with the prosecution, defense 

and/or appeal of this action, including their secretarial and clerical 

employees; 

d. The parties, including their officers, directors, employees and authorized 

agents; 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 4 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 4 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-4- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

e. Persons who were the authors or recipients of the documents in the 

ordinary course of business, provided that any review by such persons shall 

be for the sole purpose of this action and cannot in and of itself form the 

basis of any future trade secret misappropriation claim or any other claim; 

and 

f. Any other persons to whom the parties agree in writing, including persons 

to whom disclosure is agreed upon by the parties in any amendments to this 

Order (appropriately limited in time and/or scope) for the purposes of 

facilitating settlement discussions. 

7. “Highly Confidential” material shall not be Disclosed to any person except (a) 

persons to whom the producing party previously has disclosed such discovery material and (b) the 

following persons, as to whom disclosure shall be limited to the extent reasonably necessary for 

the prosecution, defense, and/or appeal of this action: 

a. The Court, persons employed by the Court, jurors or potential jurors in this 

case any appeal therefrom, and stenographers or videographers transcribing 

or regarding the testimony or argument at hearing, trial or deposition in this 

action or any appeal therefrom; 

b. Counsel of record to the parties to this action (but excluding in-house 

counsel), associates, legal assistants, paralegals, secretarial and clerical 

employees, and outside vendors providing services to such counsel 

(including without limitation, copy services, litigation consulting services, 

document management services and graphic services); 

c. Independent experts and consultants retained, employed or informally 

consulted by counsel in connection with the prosecution, defense and/or 

appeal of this action, including their secretarial and clerical employees; 

d. Persons who were the authors or recipients of the documents in the 

ordinary course of business, provided that any review by such persons shall 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 5 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 5 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-5- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

be for the sole purpose of this action and cannot in and of itself form the 

basis of any future trade secret misappropriation claim or any other claim; 

e. Each party to this litigation may designate one in-house counsel (1) who 

has no substantial or operational involvement in competitive decisionmaking or in patent prosecutions involving Mystery Progressive games 

including but not limited to IGT’s Fort Knox, Jackpot Hunter, Party Time!, 

and Wheelionaire products or Aristocrat’s Hyperlink products, (2) to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, and (3) who has 

signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A), 

except that the designated in-house counsel shall not have access to 

“Highly Confidential” source code or written or detailed technical 

description of the trigger disclosed in the source code. The party wishing 

to disclose documents to one in-house counsel shall inform all other parties 

in writing who it will designate as its in-house counsel designee; and 

f. Any other person to whom the parties agree in writing, including persons to 

whom disclosure is agreed upon by the parties in any amendments to this 

Order (appropriately limited in time and/or scope) for the purposes of 

facilitating settlement discussions. 

8. Before “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” material may be disclosed to any 

person not identified in Paragraphs 6 and/or 7 of this Order, the consent of the producing party 

must be obtained. The party seeking to disclose such material must provide written notification 

to the producing party of the identity of the person, including his or her business or government 

affiliation, who will be shown such material, after which the producing party shall have ten (10) 

business days to object to the disclosure in writing. In the case of an objection, the party seeking 

to disclose “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” material may apply for an order from the 

Court compelling disclosure. If the producing party consents to the disclosure or fails to object 

within ten (10) business days after receipt of written notice of the intended disclosure, counsel for 

the party intending to disclose “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” material shall furnish a 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 6 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 6 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-6- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

copy of this Order to the person being given access, and the person being given access shall 

execute a copy of the confidentiality agreement annexed hereto as Exhibit A. 

9. Each expert and consultant to whom any “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” 

materials is Disclosed, as described in paragraphs 6(b)(iii) and 7(b)(iii) above, shall, prior to the 

time such material is disclosed to him or her, be provided with a copy of this Order and shall 

certify that he or he or she had carefully read the Order, fully understands its terms, agrees to be 

bound by those terms, and consents to be subject to the personal jurisdiction of this Court with 

respect to any proceeding relating to any enforcement of this Order, including any proceeding 

relating to contempt of court. Such person shall also certify that he or she has had an opportunity 

to discuss this Order and its relevant requirements with the attorney who has provided such 

confidential or highly confidential materials to such expert or consultant. This acknowledgement 

and consent shall be evidenced by signing a copy of the confidentiality agreement, annexed as 

Exhibit A to this Order. Executed confidentiality agreements shall be retained by the attorneys of 

record for the party on whose behalf the expert or consultant is working until further order of the 

Court. 

a. A party that seeks to disclose to an expert or consultant any information or 

item that has been designated “Highly Confidential” first must make a 

written request to the producing party that: (1) sets forth his or her full 

name and the city and state of his or her primary residence, (2) attaches a 

copy of his or her current resume, (3) identifies his or her current 

employer(s), (4) identifies each person or entity for whom the expert or 

consultant has been employed during the preceding five years, and (5) 

identifies (by name of the case) any litigation in connection with which the 

expert or consultant has provided any professional services during the 

preceding five years. 

b. A party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the 

preceding paragraph may disclose the subject “Highly Confidential” 

information to the identified expert or consultant unless, within seven court 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 7 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 7 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-7- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

days of delivering the request, the party receives a written objection from 

the producing party. Any such objection must set forth in detail the grounds 

on which it is based. 

c. A party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with 

the producing party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to 

resolve the matter by agreement. If no agreement is reached, the party 

seeking to make the disclosure to the expert or consultant may file a motion 

as provided in Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 

79-5, if applicable) seeking permission from the court to do so. 

10. Provisions of this Order insofar as they restrict the communication and use of 

“Confidential” and “Highly Confidential” material shall continue to be binding on all persons 

subject to the terms of this Order until further order of this Court. 

11. The restrictions on the use of “Confidential” and “Highly Confidential” material 

established pursuant to this Order do not apply to the party, person, or entity producing such 

material. 

12. The foregoing is without prejudice to the right of any party to this Order: (a) to 

apply to the Court for a further protective order relating to any “Confidential” and “Highly 

Confidential” material or relating to any production of documents it considers not subject to 

discovery; (b) to challenge the confidential designation of any document or other information; 

and (c) to seek an order from the Court compelling production of documents or modification of 

this Order or for any order permitting disclosure of confidential material beyond the terms of this 

Order. A party shall not be obliged to challenge the propriety of a confidentiality designation at 

the time made, and failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge to such designation. 

In the event any party to these actions objects, at any stage of the proceedings, to the designation 

of a document or testimony as confidential, the parties shall try first to dispose of such dispute in 

good faith on an informal basis. If the dispute cannot be resolved informally, the objecting party 

may, on notice to all other parties, apply to the Court for appropriate relief. The supplying party 

seeking to maintain the confidentiality of the information shall have the burden of establishing 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 8 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 8 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-8- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

that the document or testimony is entitled to confidential treatment. If an application to the Court 

is made, the document or testimony shall continue to be treated as confidential until the Court 

enters an order determining otherwise. 

13. Without written permission from the producing party or a court order secured after 

appropriate notice to all interested persons, a party may not file in the public record in this action 

any document that reveals any “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” material. A party that 

seeks to file under seal any “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” material must comply with 

Civil Local Rule 79-5. Each party or non-party that designates information or items for 

protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 

qualifies under appropriate standards. A producing or designating party must take care to 

designate for protection only those parts of material that qualify so that other portions of the 

material for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably with the ambit of this 

Order. To the extent any briefs, interrogatory responses or expert reports in this action are 

designated “Highly Confidential” pursuant to this Order, the producing or designating party shall 

serve with the designated version (or within the next forty-eight hours), redacted versions such 

that non-highly confidential information may be promptly reviewed by appropriate party 

personnel consistent with this Order. To the extent a receiving party is dissatisfied with the extent 

of the redactions, a receiving party may propose a revised redacted version to the producing 

party’s counsel, and the producing or designating party must respond within two days with either 

an acceptance of the revised redacted version or an explanation as to why the revised redacted 

version is not accepted (the explanation may include an acceptance of some but not all proposed 

revisions to the redactions). If the resulting redacted materials are not believed sufficient, and 

good faith meet/confer negotiations do not resolve the dispute, the receiving party may apply for 

relief from the Court, and the producing or designating party shall bear the burden of persuasion 

with respect to the justification for maintaining redactions that are challenged. In addition to the 

requirements set forth under Civil Local Rule 79-5, a party seeking to file under seal any 

information under a “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” designation must: (a) place said 

information in a sealed envelope; (b) include instructions that the document is filed pursuant to 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 9 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 9 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-9- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

the Stipulated Protective and Confidentiality Order and that the envelope is not to be opened 

absent further order of the court; and (c) label the envelope to identify the title of the case, the 

case number, and the title of the document. 

14. If “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” material is disclosed at a deposition, 

only those persons who are authorized by the terms of this Order to receive such material may be 

present at the deposition. A party, person, or entity wishing to designate deposition testimony as 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” may so designate it on the record during the deposition 

or within thirty (30) days after the designating party, person, entity, or his or her counsel, receives 

the written deposition transcripts, the portions of the deposition transcripts of all testimony so 

designated may be bound separately by the reporter in booklets bearing the appropriate 

designation. Access to such portions of this deposition record shall be limited pursuant to the 

terms of this Order. In addition, the portion of any deposition in which documents designated as 

containing “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” information are marked as exhibits or shown 

to the deponent or otherwise employed shall be considered confidential and subject to the 

provisions of this Order to the extent that such portion of the transcript contains “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential” information. 

15. The inadvertent or unintentional disclosure by the supplying party of confidential 

information, regardless of whether the information was so designated at the time of the 

disclosure, shall not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of a party’s claim of confidentiality, 

either as to the specific information disclosed or as to any other information relating thereto on 

the same or related subject matter. The inadvertent or unintentional disclosure by the supplying 

party of information covered by the attorney-client of attorney work product privileges, shall not 

be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of a party’s claim of privilege, provided that if a dispute 

arises as to whether a privilege attaches to the information at issue, the supplying party shall bear 

the burden of establishing that such privilege attaches. 

16. Within thirty (30) days after the settlement or final adjudication, including appeals, 

of the action or actions in which the documents have been produced, all “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential” material supplied by the parties and non-parties and all copies thereof shall 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 10 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 10 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-10- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

be returned to the producing party or non-party (if the supplying party so requests within fifteen 

(15) days of the conclusion of the actions and pays the reasonable costs of such return) or shall be 

certified to have been destroyed; provided, however, that each party’s outside counsel may retain 

a complete file of all litigation documents filed with the Court in these actions. 

17. In order to facilitate third-party discovery, the protections afforded herein shall 

extend to documents or other things and to testimony provided by or originating from persons, 

firms, corporations or other entities not a party to this action who designate materials as 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” in the manner provided in paragraph 4. Any third-party 

seeking to obtain these protections must sign a copy of the confidentiality agreement annexed to 

this Order as Exhibit A. 

18. The Court retains jurisdiction even after final disposition of this action for a period 

of 6 months to enforce this Order and to make such amendments, modifications, deletions or 

additions to this Order as the Court may from time to time deem appropriate. The parties hereto 

reserve all rights to apply to the Court at any time, before or after termination, for an order: (a) 

modifying this Order; (b) seeking further protection against discovery or other use of 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” information; or (c) seeking further production, 

discovery, disclosure or use of claimed “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” information. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 11 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 11 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-11- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

Dated: February 1, 2007 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

By: /s/ Robert J. Blanch 

Terrence P. McMahon 

Anthony de Alcuaz 

Robert J. Blanch 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES 

AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED AND 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 

By: /s/ Jeffrey S. Love 

Jeffrey S. Love 

Samir N. Pandya 

Garth A. Winn 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INTERNATIONAL GAME 

TECHNOLOGY and 

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Plaintiff 

IGT 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE 

LLP 

By: /s/ Eric L.Wesenberg 

 Eric L. Wesenberg 

Attorney for Defendant 

INTERNATIONAL GAME 

TECHNOLOGY and 

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Plaintiff 

IGT 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 12 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 12 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-12- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

ATTESTATION 

CERTIFICATION BY ROBERT J. BLANCH PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE NO. 45, 

SECTION X. RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES 

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California, and am a 

[associate/partner] in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP, counsel for plaintiff[s] 

Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.. The statements 

herein are made on my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness I could and would testify 

thereto. 

2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that 

concurrence has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared 

document with the Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support 

this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon 

request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct on this 1st day of February, 2007. 

 /s/Robert J. Blanch 

 Robert J. Blanch 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 13 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 13 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-13- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

EXHIBIT A 

I, _______________________, state that: 

1. My home address is __________________________________________________ 

________________________________________________________________________. 

2. My present employer is _______________________________________________ 

________________________________________________________________________. 

3. My present occupation or job description is _______________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

________________________________________________________________________. 

4. I am not working or consulting for any party in the above-captioned lawsuit, 

except as follows: _______________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

________________________________________________________________________. 

5. I have received a copy of the Stipulated Protective and Confidentiality Order (the 

“Stipulated Protective Order”) in the above-captioned lawsuit and I have carefully read and 

understand the provisions of the Stipulated Protective Order, a copy of which is appended hereto. 

6. Counsel for ________________________________________________________ 

has explained to me my obligations under the Stipulated Protective Order. 

7. I will comply with all of the provisions of the Stipulated Protective Order. 

8. I will advise any necessary assistant of mine if authorized to receive confidential 

information under this Protective Order on the nature of any “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL” information which I disclose to such assistant and will be responsible for 

assuring that such assistant complies with the same obligations of confidentiality to which I am 

hereby agreeing. 

9. Upon completion of my work, I will return all “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL” information which comes into my possession to counsel for the party by 

whom I am employed or retained. 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 14 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 14 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-14- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

10. I further acknowledge that any failure to comply with the Stipulated Protective 

Order may be punishable as contempt of Court and/or give rise to a claim against me by the party 

or parties who designated the information as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL.” 

11. I hereby submit to the jurisdiction of this Court for the purpose of enforcement of 

this Declaration and Acknowledgement pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order. If my 

primary residence is outside the United States, I hereby appoint 

________________________________ [print or type full name] of 

_________________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone 

number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any 

proceedings related to enforcement of this Protective Order. The appointment of [print or type 

full name] as my California agent for service of process shall terminate at the time this litigation 

concludes. 

12. I declare that all statements made herein are true and correct and understand that 

any willful false statement is punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. 

Executed on _________________ at _________________________. 

 ________________________________ 

 Signature 

 ________________________________ 

 Name (typed / printed) 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 15 of 16
 Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 15 of 16
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE AND CONFIDENTIALITY 

ORDER

-15- (Case No. C-06-3717-MJJ) 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February ____, 2007 ________________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 MARTIN JENKINS 

MPK 121624-1.074272.0016 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 117 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 16 of 16

5

Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 120 Filed 02/05/07 Page 16 of 16