Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03114/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03114-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 *E-FILED 9/5/06*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ISMART INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

Plaintiff, 

vs.

I-DOCSECURE, LLC, a California limited liability

company; E-NETSECURE SERVICES, INC., a

California corporation; INTEGRITY DATA

APPLICATION CONSULTING, LLC, a California

limited liability company; ISMART SECURE LLC, a

Delaware limited liability company; JOSEPH BAGGIO,

an individual; JONATHAN BALZORA, an individual,

Defendants. ______________________________________________

CASE NO. C 04-03114 RMW (RS)

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION

OF TIME

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.

______________________________________________

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for additional time to comply with the order filed

August 8, 2006, requiring further document production. The Court has reviewed the declaration of

Christopher J. Keller, filed September 1, 2006 and is satisfied that counsel acted in good faith in not

previously notifying the Court about the fire in plaintiff’s offices. The Court has disregarded the

declaration of Shanee Y. Williams filed on September 1, 2006 because the Court’s order dated

August 8, 2006, expressly directed that no responsive materials were to be filed by defendants

Case 5:04-cv-03114-RMW Document 287 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

absent further order of court. The Court has also disregarded the supplemental declaration of

Joseph Kouri, filed September 1, 2006, which largely is a response to the Williams declaration. 

The parties are directed to renew their efforts to carry out their duties of vigorous advocacy on

behalf of their respective clients without unnecessary invective.

Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that plaintiff shall produce the “secondary copies

of bank and tax documents” referred to in the Keller declaration as soon as practicable but no later

than September 9, 2006 and shall produce that the “tax documents” referred to in the Keller

declaration as soon as practicable but no later than September 17, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 9/5/06 

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:04-cv-03114-RMW Document 287 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Michael N. Edelman michaeledelman@paulhastings.com,

christinahenderson@paulhastings.com; marcosvera@paulhastings.com;

lauriepaffhausen@paulhastings.com

Christopher James Keller christopher.keller@sdma.com, sdmacalendaring@sdma.com

Marc A. Koonin marc.koonin@sdma.com

Joseph Kouri joseph.kouri@sdma.com

Shanee Y. Williams shaneewilliams@paulhastings.com,

rosemaryjonesshine@paulhastings.com

Dated: 9/5/06 Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg

By: /s/ BAK 

Case 5:04-cv-03114-RMW Document 287 Filed 09/05/06 Page 3 of 3