Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-08193/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-08193-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 367
Nature of Suit: TORTS - Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES

PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITYLITIGATION MDL No. 2738

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -193)

On October 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court forthe District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1407. See 220 F.Supp.3d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,843 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have

been assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that arecommon to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to JudgeWolfson.Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of October 4, 2016, and, with the consent

of that court, assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall bestayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is

pending at this time, the

stay is lifted. FOR THE PANEL:

Jan 21 2020

CLERKS OFFICE

UNITED STATES

JUDICIAL PMEL ON

MULTIDISTRICTLITISATION

John W. Nichols

Clerk of the Panel

11 TZi.BY CERIIFY that the aho i’d

1oregoirg is a true and correct co27 of the oii ile in my office

ED STATE 1ST CC T
SCHEDULE CTO-193 -TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA CENTRAL

CAC 5 19—02425 Hansi E. Tietge et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 2 19—02520 Gaskins v. Johnson & Johnson et al

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 19—08 193 Charles E. Brandner v. Johnson & Johnson et al

CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN

CA$ 3 19—02409 Bailey v. Johnson & Johnson et a!

MASSACHUSETTS

MA 1 20—10008 Bonta v. Johnson & Johnson et al

NEW YORK EASTERN

NYE 2 19—07117 Zaleski v. Johnson & Johnson et. a!.NYE 2 20—00086 Gallagher et a! v. Johnson & Johnson et a!

NEW YORK NORTHERN

NYN 5 19—0 1540 Pattit v. Johnson & Johnson, et al.