Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-03962/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-03962-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Winans v. Emeritus Corp., Case No. 3:13-cv-03962-SC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kathryn A. Stebner, State Bar No. 121088

Sarah Colby, State Bar No. 194475 

George Kawamoto, State Bar No. 280358 

STEBNER AND ASSOCIATES 

870 Market Street, Suite 1212 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Tel: (415) 362-9800 

Fax: (415) 362-9801 

Guy B. Wallace, State Bar No. 176151 

Mark T. Johnson, State Bar No. 76904 

SCHNEIDER WALLACE 

COTTRELL KONECKY LLP 

180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Tel: (415) 421-7100 

Fax: (415) 421-7105

Michael D. Thamer, State Bar No. 101440

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D. THAMER 

Old Callahan School House 

12444 South Highway 3 

Post Office Box 1568 

Callahan, California 96014-1568 

Tel: (530) 467-5307 

Fax: (530) 467-5437 

W. Timothy Needham, State Bar No. 96542

JANSSEN MALLOY LLP 

730 Fifth Street 

Eureka, CA 95501 

Tel: (707) 445-2071 

Fax: (707) 445-8305 

Robert S. Arns, State Bar No. 65071

THE ARNS LAW FIRM 

515 Folsom Street, 3rd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Tel: (415) 495-7800 

Fax: (415) 495-7888

Christopher J. Healey, State Bar No. 105798

McKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE, LLP

600 West Broadway, Suite 2600 

San Diego, CA 92101-3372

Telephone No.: 619.235.3491 

Facsimile No.: 619.645.5328 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the proposed Class 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Arville Winans, by and through his Guardian ad litem, 

Renee Moulton, on his own behalf and on behalf of others 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs.

Emeritus Corp. and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-03962-SC 

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

RESET THE CASE 

MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Judge: Hon. Samuel Conti 

CMC: January 9, 2015

10:00 a.m. 

Courtroom 1

Case 4:13-cv-03962-HSG Document 82 Filed 01/02/15 Page 1 of 3
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Winans v. Emeritus Corp., Case No. 3:13-cv-03962-SC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION 

The Parties hereby provide notice of their stipulation to reset the Case Management 

Conference, currently scheduled for January 9, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., with the Honorable Samuel 

Conti.

WHEREAS, the parties filed a Joint Initial Case Management Statement and Joint Rule 

26(f) Conference Report on December 13, 2013; 

WHEREAS, on March 5, 2014, the Court denied Defendants’ Motion to Strike the First 

Amended Complaint, and the Court granted in part and denied part Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss the First Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, the parties filed an Amended Joint Initial Case Management Statement on 

April 11, 2014;

WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference occurred on April 18, 2014, with 

the Honorable Samuel Conti; 

WHEREAS, on June 9, 2014, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff’s 

Motion for Clarification; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff is preparing his Second Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, the Parties, upon meeting and conferring, have agreed to reset the Case 

Management Conference currently set for January 9, 2015, to February 20, 2015, so that the Case 

Management Conference may occur after the Plaintiff files or seeks leave to file his Second 

Amended Complaint; 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their counsel of record and subject to 

Court approval, hereby stipulate that:

1. The Case Management Conference set for January 9, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., should be 

reset to February 20, 2015, or a later date pursuant to the Court’s availability; and 

2. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement on or before February 13, 

2015.

//

Case 4:13-cv-03962-HSG Document 82 Filed 01/02/15 Page 2 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Winans v. Emeritus Corp., Case No. 3:13-cv-03962-SC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: December 30, 2014 

STEBNER AND ASSOCIATES 

/s/ Kathryn A. Stebner

Kathryn A. Stebner 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the proposed Class 

DATED: December 30, 2014 

 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP

 /s/ Thomas J. Nolan 

Thomas J. Nolan 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

I, Kathryn A. Stebner, hereby declare, pursuant to the Northern District of California 

Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from 

Thomas J. Nolan. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on December 30, 2014, in the City of San Francisco, California. 

 /s/ Kathryn Stebner 

Kathryn A. Stebner 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED. A 

FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD ON 

______________________, 2015 AT _________. 

Dated: ______________________ _________________________________________ 

 Honorable Samuel Conti 

 United States District Judge 

February 20 10:00 AM

01/02/2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 4:13-cv-03962-HSG Document 82 Filed 01/02/15 Page 3 of 3