Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02612/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02612-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN K. DOUGLAS, 

an individual,

NO. CIV. S-09-2612 LKK/GGH

Plaintiff,

v.

O R D E R

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Pending in the above-captioned matter is a motion to dismiss

filed by defendants. (Doc. No. 7) Hearing for this matter was set

for December 21, 2009. Plaintiff did not file an opposition or

statement of non-opposition to this motion. Instead, plaintiff

filed a document titled “notice of intent to file an amended

complaint,” stating that an amended complaint would be filed prior

to the noticed hearing date. (Doc. No. 10.) 

The court then issued an order stating that if an amended

complaint was filed prior to December 21, 2009, the motion to

dismiss would be denied as moot, but that the motion to dismiss

would otherwise be granted as unopposed. This deadline passed more

Case 2:09-cv-02612-LKK -GGH Document 14 Filed 01/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

than two weeks ago. Plaintiff has neither filed an amended

complaint nor offered any explanation for her failure to do so. 

Accordingly the court GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss.

Dismissal is with prejudice. The clerk of the court is directed

to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 11, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02612-LKK -GGH Document 14 Filed 01/11/10 Page 2 of 2