Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05085/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05085-49/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50750/1920448.1 Case No. 03 05085 (WWS)

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING FRISKIT'S OBJECTIONS TO SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

FRISKIT, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

REALNETWORKS, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

 CASE NO. 03 05085 (WWS) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING 

FRISKIT'S OBJECTIONS TO PORTIONS 

OF DR. SMITH'S JUNE 28, 2006, 

SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT 

Case 3:03-cv-05085-WWS Document 479 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-05085-WWS Document 480 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50750/1920448.1 -2- Case No. 03 05085 (WWS)

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING FRISKIT'S OBJECTIONS TO SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT

THE COURT, having considered Friskit's Objections to Portions of Dr. Smith's June 28, 

2006, Supplemental Expert Report (the "Motion"); the supporting documentation thereto; 

Defendants' opposition and supporting documentation thereto; all parties having been given notice 

and an opportunity to be heard; and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefor; HEREBY ORDERS 

THAT: 

1. Friskit's Objections to Portions of Dr. Smith's June 28, 2006, Supplemental 

Expert Report and request to strike portions thereof (#471) is Denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 Honorable Judge William W. Schwarzer 

Northern District of California 

Case 3:03-cv-05085-WWS Document 479 Filed 07/17/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-05085-WWS Document 480 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2