Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00303/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00303-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIA BOLLINGER, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

Case No. 1:24-cv-00303-JLT-SAB

ORDER REQUIRING THAT PLAINTIFFS

FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 

NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 20, 2024

(ECF No. 41) 

DEADLINE: December 20, 2024 at 12 p.m. PST

On December 17, 2024, Defendant filed a motion for administrative relief seeking a 

seventeen day extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs’ December 13, 2024 motion for leave to 

file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 41.) Defendant’s opposition, if any, is currently due 

on December 27, 2024. See L.R. 230(c). Defendant proffers that the volume and nature of the 

Plaintiffs’ proposed amendments and the propriety of Plaintiffs’ motion requires additional time 

to formulate an opposition. Further, Defendant provides a declaration by counsel that explains 

the extension is sought to accommodate the upcoming holidays and vacation plans. (ECF No. 41-

2 at 2.) Despite this reasoning being relayed to Plaintiffs’ counsel on December 16, 2024, 

Plaintiffs’ counsel informed Defendants’ counsel that Plaintiffs oppose the extension. (Id. at 4.) 

Plaintiffs’ opposition or supporting statement to Defendant’s motion for administrative 

relief is currently due on December 23, 2024. L.R. 233(b); Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 6. The Court is 

closed on December 24, 2024 and December 25, 2024. Given Plaintiffs had notice of 

Defendant’s request for extension by December 16, 2024, Defendant’s proffer of the 

Case 1:24-cv-00303-JLT-SAB Document 42 Filed 12/18/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

unavailability of counsel, and the Court’s two-day closure, the Court finds it imprudent to issue 

an order regarding Defendant’s request for extension of time on December 26, 2024, the day 

before the deadline. Further, the Court does not independently find a reason to deny Defendants’ 

request for a seventeen-day extension of time to file an opposition, if any, to Plaintiffs’ motion for 

leave to file a second amended complaint. The Court shall therefore order Plaintiffs to file a 

supporting statement or opposition to Defendants’ request for an extension of time within a 

shortened timeframe. The opposition or supporting statement must otherwise conform with the 

requirements provided by Local Rule 233(b). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs file a supporting statement or 

opposition to Defendant’s request for an extension of time to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s 

motion for leave to amend to file a second amended complaint no later than 12:00 p.m. PST on 

December 20, 2024. Plaintiffs’ failure to do so shall be construed as a non-opposition to 

Defendant’s motion for a seventeen day extension of time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 18, 2024 

STANLEY A. BOONE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:24-cv-00303-JLT-SAB Document 42 Filed 12/18/24 Page 2 of 2