Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00512/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00512-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Will Moses Palmer, III, (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on 

April 28, 2006. (ECF No. 1.) This action now proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint 

against Defendants Lopez, Jordnt, and Bardonnex for retaliation and denial of access to the courts. 

(ECF Nos. 111, 112.) 

On July 5, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations that Defendant

Lopez be dismissed from this action, without prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to effect service of 

summons and complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The findings and 

recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections should be filed within 

thirty (30) days after service. More than thirty (30) days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed any 

objections. 

WILL MOSES PALMER, III,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JORDNT, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:06-cv-00512-LJO-BAM PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT LOPEZ FOR 

FAILURE TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE OF 

PROCESS

(ECF No. 111, 112, 120, 121)

Case 1:06-cv-00512-LJO-BAM Document 122 Filed 08/12/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and 

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on July 5, 2013, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant Lopez is DISMISSED from this action, without prejudice, based on 

Plaintiff’s failure to effect service of summons and complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 4(m). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 12, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

b9ed48bb

Case 1:06-cv-00512-LJO-BAM Document 122 Filed 08/12/13 Page 2 of 2