Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-06230/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-06230-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

- 1 -

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

Case No. 19-cv-06230-YGR 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

W. Scott Holleman (#310266)

Marion C. Passmore (#228474)

BRAGAR EAGEL & SQUIRE, P.C.

101 California Street, Suite 2710

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 365-714

Email: holleman@bespc.com

passmore@bespc.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff James Carlson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES CARLSON, Derivatively on Behalf of 

AMYRIS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JOHN DOERR, JOHN G. MELO, FRANK 

KUNG, KATHLEEN VALIASEK, 

GEOFFREY DUYK, CAROLE PIWNICA, R. 

NEIL WILLIAMS, PATRICK YANG, 

PHILIP EYKERMAN, CHRISTOPH 

GOPPELSROEDER, STEVEN MILLS, 

ABDULLAH BIN KHALIFA AL THANI, 

CHRISTOPHE VUILLEZ, and 

FERNANDO DE CASTRO REINACH, 

Defendants, 

-andAMYRIS, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Nominal Defendant. 

Case No.: 19-cv-06230-YGR

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Judge: Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 

Courtroom: 4, 3rd Floor 

ORDER GRANTING

Case 4:19-cv-06230-YGR Document 24 Filed 12/13/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

Case No. 19-cv-06230-YGR 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO: ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE plaintiff James Carlson (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of 

Amyris, Inc. (“Amyris”), hereby voluntarily dismisses, without prejudice, all claims and causes of 

action against all defendants in this action. No defendant has filed or served an answer or a motion 

for summary adjudication. Notice of voluntary dismissal to shareholders (see Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure Rule 23.1(c)) is not required here because: (i) there has been no settlement or 

compromise of the action; (ii) there has been no collusion among the parties; (iii) neither plaintiff 

nor his counsel have received or will receive directly or indirectly any consideration from 

defendants for the dismissal; and (iv) the dismissal is without prejudice – Plaintiff and Amyris 

shareholders remain free to pursue these claims in the same or a similar action in the future. 

Dated: December 10, 2019 Respectfully submitted, 

BRAGAR EAGEL & SQUIRE, P.C. 

/s/ W. Scott Holleman

W. Scott Holleman (#310266)

Marion C. Passmore (#228474)

101 California Street, Suite 2710

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 365-714

Email: holleman@bespc.com

 passmore@bespc.com 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 13, 2019 __________________________________

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:19-cv-06230-YGR Document 24 Filed 12/13/19 Page 2 of 2