Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01971/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01971-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

WORDTECH SYSTEMS, INC., a

California corporation,

No. 2:04-cv-1971-MCE-PAN

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS,

INC., a Nevada corporation,

dba INTEGRATED NETWORK

SOLUTIONS, CORP. aka

INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS

aka INTEGRATED SYSTEMS aka

INTEGRATED NETWORK STORAGE

COMPANY aka INSC; NASSER

KHATEMI, an individual; HAMID

ASSADIAN, an individual;

EHTERAM GHODSIAN, an

individual; SHOHREH JAVADI, an

individual; MICHAEL F.

ELLSWORTH, an individual;

BRIAN J. DEAN, an individual;

SAN JUAN UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT; and DOES 1-50,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

Plaintiff Wordtech Systems, Inc. (“Wordtech”) has filed a

Motion to Extend Discovery Cut-off in this matter, which is

Case 2:04-cv-01971-TLN-EFB Document 70 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Because oral argument would not be of material assistance, 1

this matter was deemed suitable for decision without oral

argument. E.D. Local Rule 78-230(h).

2

currently set to expire on January 20, 2006. According to

Wordtech, the Integrated Network Solutions Defendants, which

include both Integrated Networks and Defendants Khatemi and

Assadian (hereinafter “INSC Defendants”), have failed to respond

to previous discovery efforts in a forthcoming manner, thereby

necessitating an extension in order to complete the discovery

process. No previous extension of the discovery cut-off has been

sought.

The INSC Defendants, in response, indicate that they do not

oppose an extension of discovery by at least sixty (60) days,

stating that Wordtech has also failed to fully cooperate with

their discovery requests. In addition, Co-Defendant and CrossClaimant San Juan Unified School District has filed a joinder to

Wordtech’s continuance request on grounds that additional time to

complete discovery is indeed necessary.

Given the non-opposition to Wordtech’s request, and good

cause appearing therefor, the Motion to Extend Discovery is

GRANTED. Discovery shall be completed not later than March 20, 1

2006. Consistent with that extension, the deadlines for expert

designation and the hearing of dispositive motions are also

continued to May 19, 2006 and June 19, 2006, respectively. The

August 14, 2006 date for the Final Pretrial Conference, as well

as the September 20, 2006 trial date, remain unchanged pursuant

//

//

Case 2:04-cv-01971-TLN-EFB Document 70 Filed 01/11/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

to the Court’s Amended Pretrial (Status) Scheduling Order of July

15, 2005. No further extensions will be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 10, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01971-TLN-EFB Document 70 Filed 01/11/06 Page 3 of 3