Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00700/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00700-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

APPLICATION/ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

Peter M. de Jonge (Utah SBN 7185) 

Gordon K. Hill (California SBN 218999) 

Jed H. Hansen (Utah SBN 10,679) 

THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, LLP 

8180 South 700 East, Suite 200 

Sandy, Utah 84070 

Telephone: (801) 566-6633 

Facsimile: (801) 566-0753 

Mark M. Bettilyon (Utah SBN 4798) 

RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER 

36 South State Street, Suite 1400 

Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 

Telephone: (801) 532-1500 

Facsimile: (801) 532-7543 

Glenn W. Peterson (California SBN 126173) 

MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210 

Roseville, CA 95661 

Telephone: (916) 780-8222 

Facsimile: (916) 780-8775 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, CYTOSPORT, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CYTOSPORT, INC., a California 

Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CYTOGENIX SPORTS LABORATORIES, 

SRL, a Barbados Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: 2:10-CV-00700-WBS-KJM 

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND 

DEADLINE FOR SERVING COMPLAINT 

AND TO CONTINUE JOINT STATUS 

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) 

CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEADLINE TO SERVE COMPLAINT 

AND CONTINUING JOINT STATUS 

CONFERENCE 

______________________________________

Date: September 20, 2010 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

Courtroom: 5 

Honorable William B. Shubb 

Case 2:10-cv-00700-WBS -EFB Document 7 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

APPLICATION/ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

APPLICATION

Plaintiff hereby applies ex parte for postponement of the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) 

Conference (and a corresponding 60-day extension of the time allotted under Local Rule 210 to 

serve the Complaint). 

This application is supported by the concurrently-filed declaration of Gordon K. Hill. 

By order dated March 24, 2010 [Document 5], this matter was scheduled for an Initial 

Scheduling Conference to be heard on September 20, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. 

The Complaint has not been served upon the Defendant in order to give the parties an 

opportunity to resolve this matter without the Court’s assistance. 

As set forth in the concurrently-filed declaration of Gordon K. Hill (co-counsel for plaintiff), 

the parties have been in regular communication since the filing of the Complaint and have earnestly 

discussed various settlement opportunities. Settlement negotiations are continuing between the 

parties. 

Draft settlement documents have been exchanged. (Hill Decl., ¶¶ 3, 4) 

Because the prospect of settlement appears favorable, we wish to economize the costs 

associated with pleading and preparation of the joint status report, and the associated court 

appearance. 

For these reasons, we now seek an additional continuance of the scheduling conference in 

order to continue negotiations (and hopefully execution) of a settlement agreement. We also seek a 

60-day extension of the time allotted under Local Rule 210 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) to serve the 

Complaint, which would make the new deadline for serving the Complaint September 19, 2010. 

 While recognizing that we are in arrears of the court-ordered schedule, we believe that these 

circumstances warrant an additional postponement of the Pretrial Scheduling Conference, an 

extension of the deadline for serving the Complaint, and respectfully request that the Court order that 

the scheduling conference (currently set for September 20, 2010) be continued for approximately 60 

days. We are hopeful that a voluntary dismissal will precede the new conference date. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:10-cv-00700-WBS -EFB Document 7 Filed 07/21/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

APPLICATION/ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

DATED: July 20, 2010 

 THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, L.L.P. 

 RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER P.C. 

 -andMILLSTONE, PETERSON & WATTS, LLP 

 

 By: /s/ Glenn W. Peterson 

 GLENN W. PETERSON

 Attorneys for Plaintiff CytoSport, Inc. 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

"conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 

MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

/s/ Glenn W. Peterson 

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing application, and good cause appearing, the deadline for serving the 

Complaint in this matter is extended to September 19, 2010, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) 

Conference in this matter is continued to November 15, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. If joint scheduling 

remains an issue at that time, a joint scheduling report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days

prior to the conference date. 

SO ORDERED. 

DATED: July 20, 2010 

Case 2:10-cv-00700-WBS -EFB Document 7 Filed 07/21/10 Page 3 of 3