Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01947/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01947-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROMEO BRAVO, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs, CIV. NO. S-06-1947 LKK GGH

vs.

LYCOMING ENGINES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Presently before the court is defendants’ December 17, 2007 ex parte application

for extension of time to respond to discovery requests. Although defendants improperly noticed

this matter for hearing on December 20, 2007, the court will hear the matter in conjunction with

its plan to set for hearing a discovery conference, and a hearing on defendants’ motion for

reconsideration of this court’s order of October 31, 2007, as referred to this court by Judge

Karlton on December 13, 2007.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that hearing is set for December 20, 2007, at 10:00

a.m. to address: defendants’ motion for reconsideration of this court’s October 31, 2007

discovery order, defendants’ ex parte application for extension of time to respond to discovery

requests, filed December 17, 2007, and to hold a discovery conference. Counsel for plaintiff may

appear by telephone, but the undersigned discourages such an appearance as much work needs to

Case 2:06-cv-01947-LKK -GGH Document 143 Filed 12/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

be done if this case is to move forward. Telephone appearances are not as useful as in person

appearances.

DATED: 12/18/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

 U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:076/RomeoBravo1947.mtns.wpd

Case 2:06-cv-01947-LKK -GGH Document 143 Filed 12/18/07 Page 2 of 2