Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00529/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00529-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NIRMAL SINGH, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

ALBERTO GONZALES, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:07-cv-00529 LJO-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 14)

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION (Doc. 13)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On January 29, 2008, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the instant petition on the

grounds of lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. 13). On May 20, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the

case issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Petitioner's motion be granted and

that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED. (Doc. 14). The Findings and

Recommendations was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. To date, none of the parties in this case

have filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Case 1:07-cv-00529-LJO-TAG Document 16 Filed 06/18/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued May 20, 2008 (Doc. 14), are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 13), is GRANTED;

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 17, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00529-LJO-TAG Document 16 Filed 06/18/08 Page 2 of 2