Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-4_04-cv-04035/USCOURTS-arwd-4_04-cv-04035-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

ANTHONY M. HARRIS PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 04-4035

 

DANIEL McGUINNESS, Center

Supervisor, Southwest Arkansas

Community Corrections Center;

MRS. HOUFF, Captain of Security;

SGT. CLARK; and MR. SMITH DEFENDANTS

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Anthony Harris filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on March

1, 2004. His complaint was filed in forma pauperis (IFP). 

On August 31, 2005, defendants filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 18). On September 13,

2005, the undersigned entered an order (Doc. 21) directing Harris to complete, sign and return

an attached questionnaire that would serve as his response to the motion to dismiss.

The plaintiff’s response to the questionnaire was to be returned by October 13, 2005. 

On September 19, 2003, mail sent to Harris by the court was returned as undeliverable. On

October 3, 2005, mail sent to Harris by the court was again returned as undeliverable. This mail

included the court’s order and attached questionnaire. 

No other address appears in the file for Harris. Plaintiff has not informed the court of any

change in his address. Plaintiff has not communicated with the court. 

I therefore recommend Harris’ claims be dismissed on the grounds he has failed to

prosecute this action and comply with the order of the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Further,

the plaintiff has failed to keep the court informed of his current address as required by Rule

5.5(c)(2) of the Local Rules for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas. Rule 5.5(c)(2)

Case 4:04-cv-04035-HFB Document 24 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

provides in relevant part that: “It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly

notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address.” 

The parties have ten days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which

to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely

objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are

reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the

district court.

DATED this 25th day of October 2005.

 

/s/ Bobby E. Shepherd 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:04-cv-04035-HFB Document 24 Filed 10/25/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>