Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-mc-00072/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-mc-00072-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 26:7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner,

v.

KYLE W. STORKS,

Respondent.

Case No. MC-06-0072-PHX-SMM

ORDER ENFORCING SUMMONS 

Based upon the Petition filed by the United States (dkt. 1), the pleadings with respect

thereto, the oral stipulation of the parties before the Court on August 28, 2006, and good

cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING Enforcement of Petitioner's Summons

issued to Respondent Kyle W. Storks based upon Petitioner having met the United States

v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48 (1964), criteria for summons enforcement and Respondent, although

having failed to file a formal pleading, stipulating to turning over the summoned documents

and testimony to the IRS. (Dkt. 1.) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Kyle W. Storks shall produce the

documents and testimony required in the Summons on or before October 20, 2006 to the

U.S. Attorney's Office, Two Renaissance Square, 40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200,

Phoenix, AZ 85004-4408, or Respondent shall contact Revenue Officer Russell Nelson, 40

Case 2:06-mc-00072-SMM Document 7 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

-2-

West Baseline Road, Suite 213, Tempe, AZ 85283 or at (602) 207-8376 to schedule a time

and place to produce the documents and testimony identified in the Summons on or before

October 20, 2006. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent may comply within this order by

providing the testimony, and all documents and records specified in the Summons issued

on January 12, 2006, that he possesses or controls regarding his federal tax liability for the

tax periods ending on December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1997.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent’s non-compliance with the terms

and conditions of this order may serve as grounds for a finding of civil contempt against

him.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall remove the Motion for

Order to Show Cause (dkt. 2) from the pending motions report, as that motion was disposed

of on June 27, 2006. See Dkt. 3.

DATED this 29th day of August, 2006.

Case 2:06-mc-00072-SMM Document 7 Filed 08/30/06 Page 2 of 2