Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06255/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06255-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 On May 17, 2005, the Report and Recommendation was returned to the Court with a notation “not deliverable

as addressed.” The Court reserved the documents on June 44, 2005, at Petitioner’s address of record. (Court Doc. 50.) 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REGGIE L. McCOY, CASE NO. CV-F-04-6255 OWW SMS HC

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION, DENYING 

vs. PETITIONER’S REQUESTS FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND/OR

PAUL M. SCHULTZ, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Respondent. [Docs. 16, 19, 20, 28, 40]

 /

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On April 26, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation that Petitioner’s

requests for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order be DENIED. This Report and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order.1 Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party

has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and

Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Case 1:04-cv-06255-OWW -SMS Document 52 Filed 08/03/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued April 26, 2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The requests for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 1, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06255-OWW -SMS Document 52 Filed 08/03/05 Page 2 of 2