Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05025/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05025-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLORIA GRENING WOLK,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PHILIP R. GREEN,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-5025 BZ

ORDER DENYING EXPEDITED

BRIEFING AND HEARING

Plaintiff’s request for an expedited briefing schedule

and hearing on her motion to strike defendant’s affirmative

defenses is DENIED. Having read plaintiff’s motion, plaintiff 

appears to seek summary adjudication of the sufficiency of

many of the affirmative defenses on the grounds they are

“factually and legally insufficient.” Her motion appears to

rely on defendant’s responses to discovery as well as matters

contained in her affidavit. Such a motion is more properly

decided under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, Local Rule

56 and this court’s order on summary judgment motions

contained in Section 3 of the Pretrial Scheduling Order. 

Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to re-file her motion to comply

Case 3:06-cv-05025-BZ Document 131 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

with the governing rules and this court’s scheduling order so

that the matter may be heard on either March 5 or March 19,

2008, the latter being the last day to hear dispositive

motions. All efforts to meet and confer about filing a joint

statement of undisputed facts shall be recorded, either by an

audio recording or by the use of a shorthand reporter.

Dated: January 10, 2008

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\WOLK\ORDER RE MOTION TO STRIKE.wpd

Case 3:06-cv-05025-BZ Document 131 Filed 01/10/08 Page 2 of 2