Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-10-01911/USCOURTS-ca8-10-01911-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1911

___________

Calvin C. Hollowell, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Bryan E. Hosto, Attorney, Hosto, *

Buchan, Prater, and Lawrence P.L.L.C.; *

Charles J. Buchan, Attorney; Mark *

Sexton, Attorney; Paul Andrew *

Prater, Attorney; Beth Collier, Deputy * [UNPUBLISHED]

Clerk Sherwood District Court; Hosto *

Buchan Prater & Lawrence, PLLC, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: August 9, 2010

Filed: August 12, 2010

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 10-1911 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/12/2010 Entry ID: 3692898
1

The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

2

We do not construe the complaint as asserting an independent claim under 42

U.S.C. § 407. 

-2-

Calvin Hollowell appeals an order of the District Court1

 dismissing his civil

action related to state garnishment proceedings. Upon careful de novo review, see

Carter v. Arkansas, 392 F.3d 965, 968 (8th Cir. 2004), we conclude that based on the

allegations in Hollowell’s complaint, he can prove no set of facts that would entitle

him to relief on the claims he asserted under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, as

well as the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692–1692p,2

 see Bell

Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (holding that a complaint must

contain sufficient factual matter to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face;

plaintiff’s obligation to provide grounds of entitlement to relief requires more than

labels and conclusions). Accordingly, we modify the District Court’s order to reflect

that all of the claims asserted in the complaint are dismissed with prejudice, and we

affirm the order as modified. 

______________________________

Appellate Case: 10-1911 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/12/2010 Entry ID: 3692898