Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00353/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00353-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned,

plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY C. BONTEMPS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0353 MCE EFB P

vs.

DAY, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42

U.S.C. § 1983. He filed his complaint on February 22, 2007. On December 4, 2007, the court

found that the complaint stated cognizable claims as to defendants Day and Yearwood, but not as

to defendants Skinner, Kramer, Win or Tuggle. The court gave plaintiff 20 days to submit

materials for service of process on defendants Day and Yearwood, or, alternatively, 30 days to

file an amended complaint.

The times for acting have passed and plaintiff has not submitted the materials necessary

to serve process on defendants Day and Yearwood, nor has he filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the December 4, 2007, order.1

Case 2:07-cv-00353-MCE -EFB Document 9 Filed 01/31/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the

record address of the party is fully effective.

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 31, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-00353-MCE -EFB Document 9 Filed 01/31/08 Page 2 of 2