Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05584/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05584-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 196
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

THE DEADLINE FOR FILING RESPONSES TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SEAN D. BAKER CO BAR # 25949 

ANDREW M. UNTHANK, CO BAR #36832 

WHEELER TRIGG O'DONNELL LLP

1801 California Street, Suite 3600 

Denver, Colorado 80202 

Telephone: (303) 244-1800 

Facsimile: (303) 244-1879 

Attorneys for Defendants Jungle Quest Franchising, LLC; 

William E. Gabbard; Kevin P. Hein; James S. Molloy; and 

Douglas W. Root 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Ian Inman, an individual; Richard Inman, an 

individual; Diane Inman, an individual; and 

Jungle Pulse, Inc., a California Corp., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

Jungle Quest Franchising, LLC; William E. 

Gabbard; Kevin P. Hein; James S. Molloy; 

Douglas W. Root; and Preti Flatherty 

Believeau Pachios & Halley, LLP, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 09-05584 CW 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

JUDGE: Hon. Claudia Wilken 

FILE DATE: April _______, 2010 

TRIAL DATE: Not Set Yet 

 Having considered the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice, and good cause 

appearing therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice between Defendants JUNGLE 

QUEST FRANCHING LLC, WILLIAM E. GABBARD, KEVIN P. HEIN, JAMES S. 

MOLLOY, and DOUGLAS W. ROOT (collectively “JUNGLE QUEST”), on the one hand, and 

Case 4:09-cv-05584-CW Document 25 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

THE DEADLINE FOR FILING RESPONSES TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 

 - 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Plaintiffs IAN INMAN, RICHARD INMAN, DIANE INMAN, and JUNGLE PULSE, INC. 

(collectively “PLAINTIFFS”), on the other hand, is GRANTED, and PLAINTIFFS’ claims 

against JUNGLE QUEST are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

2. This Order of Dismissal With Prejudice does not dismiss PLAINTIFFS’ claims 

against Prety Flatherty Believeau Pachios & Halley, LLP. 

Dated: 4/30/2010 

 ____________________________________

 Hon. Claudia Wilken 

Case 4:09-cv-05584-CW Document 25 Filed 04/30/10 Page 2 of 2