Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_95-cv-02145/USCOURTS-cand-3_95-cv-02145-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

A. LEE and LINDA BIANCUR; LA RUE W. BEAN,

ALLEN J. MURPHY, and ROBERT and GAIL

SCHLENZIG, On Behalf Of Themselves And All

Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOHN A. HICKEY, MAMIE TANG, PILLSBURY

MADISON & SUTRO, ZRENDA, DUNN & SWAN,

and D.E. FREY, A Broker-dealership And Member

Of The National Association Of Securities Dealers,

On Behalf Of Itself And As A Representative Of A

Class Of Broker Dealers;

Defendants /

No. C 95-02145 WHA

ORDER OF REFERRAL

TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

All matters related to post-judgment collections, including the pending application for

order to appear for examination, are hereby referred to a magistrate judge. The pending

application will be heard and considered at the convenience of the magistrate judge’s calendar. 

Counsel will be advised of the date, time and place of the hearing by notice from the magistrate

judge’s chambers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 2, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:95-cv-02145-WHA Document 497 Filed 08/02/10 Page 1 of 1