Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03546/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03546-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE OPP’N & REPLY DEADLINES – Case No. 14-CV-03546

1

JAURIGUE LAW GROUP 

Michael J. Jaurigue (SBN 208123) 

Abigail A. Zelenski (SBN 228610) 

David Zelenski (SBN 231768) 

114 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 200 

Glendale, California 91203 

michael@jlglawyers.com 

abigail@jlglawyers.com 

david@jlglawyers.com 

Telephone: (818) 630-7280

Facsimile: (888) 879-1697 

GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP 

Lionel Z. Glancy (SBN 134180) 

Marc L. Godino (SBN 182689) 

Mark S. Greenstone (SBN 199606) 

1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Telephone: (310) 201-9150 

Facsimile: (310) 201-9160 

E-mail: mgreenstone@glancylaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Sunil Daniel 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SUNIL DANIEL, individually, and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

FIVE STARS LOYALTY, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-CV-03546-WHO

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE THE OPPOSITION AND 

REPLY DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND STAY

Assigned to Hon. William H. Orrick

Hearing Date: November 18, 2015

Hearing Time: 2:00 p.m.

Hearing Location: Courtroom 2

Case 3:15-cv-03546-WHO Document 33 Filed 10/09/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE OPP’N & REPLY DEADLINES – Case No. 14-CV-03546

2

 Pursuant to rules 6-1, 6-2, 7-7, and 7-12 of the Northern District of California’s Local Rules, 

Plaintiff Sunil Daniel and Defendant Five Stars Loyalty, Inc. stipulate to continue the opposition and 

reply deadlines for Five Stars’ Motion to Dismiss and Stay. The Stipulation is based on the following 

facts: 

 1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Stay was filed on October 2, 2015. (See generally 

Five Stars’ Notice of Mot. & Mot. to Dismiss First Am. Compl., & in the Alternative, to Stay the Case 

(“Def.’s Mot.”) [ECF 28].) The Motion selected a hearing date of November 18, 2015 (see Def.’s Mot. 

[ECF 28] at 1:24), which provides approximately two weeks more notice than is required under the 

Northern District’s Local Rules, see N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 7-2.

 2. Under rule 7-3 of the Local Rules, Plaintiff’s opposition papers to the Motion are due on 

October 16, 2015, and Defendant’s reply papers are due on October 23, 2015 . See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 7-

3(a). 

 3. On account of preexisting commitments, those of Plaintiff’s counsel who are principally 

tasked with handling law-and-motion matters—David Zelenski, Abigail Zelenski, and Mark 

Greenstone—have insufficient time to duly oppose Defendant’s Motion. Mr. Greenstone’s wife recently 

gave birth to their first child, and Mr. Zelenski and Ms. Zelenski are scheduled to be out of the office 

from October 10 through October 16, 2015, for a preplanned vacation. 

 4. In light of the commitments set forth in paragraph 3, Plaintiff and Defendant agree that 

the opposition deadline should be continued to October 23, 2015, and that the reply deadline should be 

continued to November 4, 2015. The hearing date will remain as set, for November 18, 2015. 

 5. The requested continuance will not affect any other matters currently scheduled by the 

Court. Adopting the above schedule for the opposition and reply papers still provides the Court with 

fourteen days from the close of all briefing to review all papers prior to the hearing—the amount of time 

contemplated by the Local Rules. See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 7-3(c). In addition, the Initial Case 

Management Conference has not yet taken place, and no scheduling order has yet been entered. 

 6. The only other continuance requested by the parties was a Stipulation extending the time 

for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s initial Complaint. (See generally Joint Stipulation to Extend 

Time to Respond to Compl. [ECF 11].) The Court granted that Stipulation on August 7, 2015. (Joint 

Case 3:15-cv-03546-WHO Document 33 Filed 10/09/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE OPP’N & REPLY DEADLINES – Case No. 14-CV-03546

3

Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Compl. [ECF 11] at 3:7–18.) 

 Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff and Defendant HEREBY STIPULATE as follows: 

 1. Plaintiff’s opposition papers to the Motion to Dismiss and Stay must be filed and served 

by October 23, 2015. 

2. Defendant’s reply papers for the Motion to Dismiss and Stay must be filed and served by 

November 4, 2015. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: October 8, 2015 JAURIGUE LAW GROUP 

 GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP 

 /s/ David Zelenski 1 

 Lionel Z. Glancy 

 Marc. L. Godino 

 Mark S. Greenstone 

Michael J. Jaurigue 

 Abigail A. Zelenski 

David Zelenski 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Sunil Daniel

Dated: October 9, 2015 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 

 /s/ Lauri Mazzuchetti 

 Lauri A. Mazzuchetti 

 Lee S. Brenner 

 Edward J. Mullins III 

 Catherine D. Lee 

Attorneys for Defendant Five Stars Loyalty, Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 9, 2015 

 Hon. William H. Orrick 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

 

1

Pursuant to rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Northern District’s Local Rules, I hereby attest that all of the 

signatories listed below, and on whose behalf the within filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s 

content and have authorized its filing. 

Case 3:15-cv-03546-WHO Document 33 Filed 10/09/15 Page 3 of 3