Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03662/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03662-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. RE: MOT. TO TRANSFER SCHEDULE & EXT. TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 

Case No. 3:16-cv-03662-LB 

sf-3686993 

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607) 

PPreovolos@mofo.com 

GRANT C. SCHRADER (CA SBN 273498) 

GSchrader@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CPA GLOBAL NORTH AMERICA, LLC, AND CPA 

GLOBAL LIMITED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RUN THEM SWEET, LLC, a California 

limited liability company, on behalf of 

themselves and those similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CPA GLOBAL LIMITED, a foreign entity 

formed under the laws of the Island of Jersey, 

Channel Islands, and CPA GLOBAL NORTH 

AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability 

company, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:16-cv-03662-LB

STIPULATION REGARDING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

TRANSFER AND EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL 

COMPLAINT 

JST

Case 3:16-cv-03662-JST Document 23 Filed 08/24/16 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. RE: MOT. TO TRANSFER SCHEDULE & EXT. TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 

Case No. 3:16-cv-03662-LB 1

sf-3686993 

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, plaintiff Run Them Sweet, LLC (“Plaintiff”), and 

defendants CPA Global North America, LLC, and CPA Global Limited (collectively, 

“Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this case on June 29, 2016; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties’ July 20, 2016 stipulation (Dkt. 12), Defendants’ 

current deadline to respond to the Complaint is September 6, 2016; 

WHEREAS, on August 18, 2016, Defendants filed a motion to transfer this action to the 

Eastern District of Virginia (Dkt. 20); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to Defendants’ motion to transfer is 

September 1, 2016, Defendants’ reply deadline is September 8, 2016, and the hearing on the 

motion is set for September 29, 2016, at 2 p.m. (Dkt. 21); 

WHEREAS, to accommodate the parties’ schedules and provide sufficient time to 

evaluate the venue issues presented by the motion to transfer, the parties have agreed on a revised 

briefing schedule on Defendants’ motion to transfer; 

WHEREAS, in order to promote the most efficient use of the Court’s and the parties’ 

resources, the parties have further agreed to extend Defendant’s deadline to respond to the 

Complaint until 30 days after the Court resolves Defendants’ motion to transfer, 

WHEREAS, the July 20 stipulation to extend the time to respond to the Complaint (Dkt. 

12) is the only previous modification of the deadlines in this case; 

WHEREAS, this stipulated extension does not affect any other existing date or deadline; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their counsel, that: 

1. Plaintiff’s time to respond to the motion to transfer is extended to September 8, 

2016, and Defendants’ time to file any reply papers on the motion to transfer is 

extended to September 22, 2016. 

2. The hearing on the motion to transfer shall remain September 29, 2016, at 2 p.m., 

or as soon thereafter as the Court may hear the motion. 

3. Defendants’ deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended 

until 30 days after the Court’s order on the motion to transfer. 

Case 3:16-cv-03662-JST Document 23 Filed 08/24/16 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. RE: MOT. TO TRANSFER SCHEDULE & EXT. TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT 

Case No. 3:16-cv-03662-LB 1

sf-3686993 

Dated: August 24, 2016 PENELOPE PREOVOLOS 

GRANT C. SCHRADER 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By: /s/ Grant C. Schrader 

 Grant C. Schrader 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CPA GLOBAL NORTH AMERICA, 

LLC AND CPA GLOBAL LIMITED 

Dated: August 24, 2016 ETHAN J. BROWN

GEOFFREY A. NERI 

BROWN, NERI, SMITH & KHAN LLP 

By: /s/ Geoffrey A. Neri 

 Geoffrey A. Neri 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

RUN THEM SWEET, LLC 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 24, 2016 _____________________________ 

 Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

 United States District Judge 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:16-cv-03662-JST Document 23 Filed 08/24/16 Page 3 of 3