Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05124/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05124-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL ROWE, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

SCRIBNER, WARDEN, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:03-cv-05124-REC-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 28)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On March 4, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DENIED, and judgment be entered in favor of Respondent. These

Findings and Recommendation were served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty

(30) days from the date of service of that order. On April 6,

2005, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendation.

//

/

Case 1:03-cv-05124-REC -SMS Document 30 Filed 05/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendation are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed March 4, 2005, are

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court ENTER judgment in favor of Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 29, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05124-REC -SMS Document 30 Filed 05/02/05 Page 2 of 2