Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-04558/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-04558-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -1- Case No. 4:14-cv-04558-YGR: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

BALL LAW CORPORATION

JONATHAN BALL, SBN 264107

jb@ball-lawcorp.com

One Market, Spear Tower, 36th Fl.

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 349-0721

Facsimile: (415) 520-6864

Attorneys for Plaintiff

iTALENT CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

iTALENT CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

iTALENT INC. dba iTALENT-DWISE, 

INC.,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 4:14-cv-04558-YGR

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO 

CONTINUE INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Date: January 26, 2015

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

Plaintiff iTALENT CORPORATION ("Plaintiff") respectfully requests that this Court 

reschedule the Initial Case Management Conference, currently set for January 26, 2015, 

to March 23, 2015 or the next available date convenient to the Court. Plaintiff makes this 

request because Plaintiff believes that Plaintiff and iTalent Inc. (“Defendant”) are close to 

resolving this dispute outside of this Court and because, on account of the ongoing 

settlement discussions between the parties, Plaintiff has not yet served its Complaint 

upon Defendant.

Desiring to avoid unnecessarily taxing this Court’s resources, Plaintiff has delayed

serving its Complaint on Defendant in order to provide time for settlement discussions to 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

Case 4:14-cv-04558-YGR Document 14 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -2- Case No. 4:14-cv-04558-YGR: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

proceed before the Defendant is forced to file an Answer and before the parties engage 

in motion practice, discovery, and further litigation. Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, the deadline for Plaintiff to serve its Complaint on Defendant is 

120 days after Plaintiff filed its Complaint. That deadline has not yet passed; in this case, 

that deadline is February 10, 2015. Plaintiff believes that it is likely that the parties will 

resolve their dispute before February 10, 2015, in which case a Case Management 

Conference will not be necessary. 

If the parties do not resolve their dispute before February 10, 2015, then Plaintiff 

intends to serve the Defendant on or before the February 10 deadline, in which case 

scheduling the Case Management Conference for March 23, 2015, would allow sufficient 

time for the parties to prepare and file one or more Case Management Statements and 

otherwise to prepare for the Case Management Conference.

Accordingly, in order to avoid unnecessary use of the Court’s resources, Plaintiff

respectfully requests that the Court continue the conference until March 23, 2015 or the 

next available date convenient to the Court.

DATED: January 19, 2015 BALL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ JONATHAN S. BALL

JONATHAN S. BALL

Attorneys455 for Plaintiff

iTALENT CORPORATION

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:________________, 2015 ______________________________________

THE HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

United States District Judge

January 21 The case management conference shall be continued to March 30, 2015.

Case 4:14-cv-04558-YGR Document 14 Filed 01/21/15 Page 2 of 2