Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-06146/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-06146-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

RICHARD C. HENNING,

Plaintiff,

v.

FRY’S ELECTRONICS, INC.; 

FAIRNBARG I LP,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:12-cv-06146 HRL

ORDER RE PARTIES’ MOTIONS IN 

LIMINE

[Re: Dkt. 70, 71, 73]

For the reasons discussed at the March 3, 2015 final pretrial conference, the court rules on 

the parties’ respective motions in limine as follows:

Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 1 to exclude witnesses from the court and to preclude

witnesses from discussing their testimony with one another is GRANTED. Fed. R. Evid. 615.

Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 2 to exclude evidence defendants did not produce in 

discovery is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is DENIED with 

respect to documents that defendants offered for inspection during discovery, namely 

(1) architectural plans and building permits for the Fry’s Campbell store; and (2) invoices for 

improvements completed at that store in 2013. The motion is otherwise GRANTED as to any 

other matters that defendant did not produce in discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(1).

Defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 1 to exclude all evidence and testimony of any witness 

plaintiff did not produce in discovery is GRANTED. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(1).

Case 5:12-cv-06146-HRL Document 79 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 2 is DENIED AS MOOT because all parties have

waived a jury trial.

Defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 3 to exclude witnesses from the courtroom is 

GRANTED. Fed. R. Evid. 615.

Defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 4 to preclude evidence concerning any other lawsuit in 

which defendants were or are named is GRANTED. Additionally, plaintiff and his witnesses are 

precluded from testifying about, or inferring that, in the past, defendants may have been a party to 

any lawsuit or involved in any other alleged incidents. Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, 403, 404(b)(1).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2015

______________________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:12-cv-06146-HRL Document 79 Filed 03/03/15 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

5:12-cv-06146-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Anthony Zand azand@bortonpetrini.com

Irene Lenislav Karbelashvili irene@irenelawoffice.com

Samuel Lawrence Phillips sphillips@bortonpetrini.com

Theresa Ilze McFarland tim@i.frys.com

William H. Curtis whc@foleymcintosh.com

Case 5:12-cv-06146-HRL Document 79 Filed 03/03/15 Page 3 of 3