Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05594/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05594-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN R. MCLEAN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WORLD SAVINGS FSB, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-05594 JSW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The motion to dismiss filed by Wachovia Mortgage FSB, and Golden West Savings

Association Service Company’s (collectively, the “Bank Defendants”) is scheduled to be heard

on March 28, 2008. On January 17, 2008, this Court issued a briefing schedule on this motion

and informed plaintiff Kevin R. McLean (“Plaintiff”) that his opposition to the motion was due

to be filed by no later than January 31, 2008. To date, no opposition has been filed. 

Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE (“OSC”) in writing, by February

8, 2008, why the Bank Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss should not be granted in light of

his failure to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. If Plaintiff seeks to file a

substantive response to the Bank Defendants’ motion, Plaintiff must demonstrate good cause for

failing to file his opposition brief in a timely fashion. In his response to this OSC, Plaintiff is

also directed to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

Plaintiff is admonished that his failure to respond this Order by February 8, will result in a

dismissal of this action against the Bank Defendants.

Case 3:07-cv-05594-JSW Document 32 Filed 02/05/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If Plaintiff seeks to file a substantive response to the Bank Defendant’s motion and

demonstrates good cause for his delay, the Court will provide the Bank Defendants an

opportunity to file a reply brief. The hearing on this motion remains set for March 28, 2008,

unless otherwise ordered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 5, 2008 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-05594-JSW Document 32 Filed 02/05/08 Page 2 of 2