Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00347/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00347-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

1182428_1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN 

 & DOWD LLP 

SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113) 

WILLOW E. RADCLIFFE (200087) 

MATTHEW S. MELAMED (260272) 

Post Montgomery Center 

One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415/288-4545 

415/288-4534 (fax) 

shawnw@rgrdlaw.com 

willowr@rgrdlaw.com 

mmelamed@rgrdlaw.com 

MOTLEY RICE LLC 

JAMES M. HUGHES (pro hac vice) 

WILLIAM S. NORTON 

CHRISTOPHER F. MORIARTY 

28 Bridgeside Blvd. 

Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 

Telephone: 843/216-9000 

843/216-9450 (fax) 

jhughes@motleyrice.com 

bnorton@motleyrice.com 

cmoriarty@motleyrice.com 

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re LEAPFROG ENTERPRISES, INC. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Master File No. 3:15-cv-00347-EMC 

CLASS ACTION 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case 3:15-cv-00347-EMC Document 96 Filed 09/02/16 Page 1 of 6
1182428_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER - 3:15-cv-00347-EMC -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the parties – lead plaintiff KBC Asset Management NV 

(“Lead Plaintiff”) and defendants LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc., John Barbour, and Raymond L. Arthur 

(“Defendants”) – by and through their undersigned counsel of record, submit the following 

stipulation and proposed order: 

WHEREAS, on May 26, 2015, the Court previously granted the parties’ stipulated request to 

continue the scheduled case management conference from September 24, 2015 to October 8, 2015 

(Dkt. No. 49); 

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2015, the Court previously granted the parties’ stipulated 

request to continue the scheduled case management conference from January 14, 2016 to March 24, 

2016, and entered the proposed schedule for Lead Plaintiff to file an amended complaint and a 

briefing schedule for Defendants anticipated motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 69); 

WHEREAS, on December 4, 2015, Lead Plaintiff filed the First Amended Consolidated 

Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws against Defendants 

(“Complaint”) (Dkt. No. 70); 

WHEREAS, on January 15, 2016, Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint (Dkt. No. 

72); 

WHEREAS, on August 2, 2016, the Court entered an Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss (“MTD Order”) and permitting Lead Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint within 30 

days (Dkt. No. 88); 

WHEREAS, on August 19, 2016, Lead Plaintiff filed Lead Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion and 

Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration concerning certain aspects of the MTD Order 

(Dkt. No. 90); 

WHEREAS, on August 31, 2016, the Court entered an Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration (“Reconsideration Order”), in which it stated that 

reconsideration at this time “would not comport with ‘conservation of judicial resources’” in light of 

the anticipated second amended complaint and ability to address the issues Lead Plaintiff raised in 

the anticipated next round of motion to dismiss briefing (Dkt. No. 93); 

Case 3:15-cv-00347-EMC Document 96 Filed 09/02/16 Page 2 of 6
1182428_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER - 3:15-cv-00347-EMC -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the second amended complaint must be filed within 30 days of the MTD Order 

(Dkt. No. 88); 

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff requests time to analyze the Reconsideration Order; and 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and have agreed to a schedule whereby: 

1. If Lead Plaintiff decides to file a second amended complaint, it shall do so no later 

than September 20, 2016; 

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss a second amended complaint shall be due on or before 

November 4, 2016, and shall be noticed for hearing on February 2, 2017; 

3. Lead Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be due on 

December 19, 2016; and 

4. Defendants’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss shall be due on January 20, 

2017. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate that: 

1. Lead Plaintiff shall have until September 20, 2016 to file a second amended 

complaint; 

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss a second amended complaint shall be due on or before 

November 4, 2016, and shall be noticed for hearing on February 2, 2017; 

3. Lead Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be due on 

December 19, 2016; and 

4. Defendants’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss shall be due on January 20, 

2017. 

DATED: September 1, 2016 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN 

 & DOWD LLP 

SHAWN A. WILLIAMS 

WILLOW E. RADCLIFFE 

MATTHEW S. MELAMED 

s/ Matthew S.Melamed

 MATTHEW S. MELAMED

19

Case 3:15-cv-00347-EMC Document 96 Filed 09/02/16 Page 3 of 6
1182428_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER - 3:15-cv-00347-EMC -3-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Post Montgomery Center 

One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415/288-4545 

415/288-4534 (fax)

MOTLEY RICE LLC 

JAMES M. HUGHES 

WILLIAM S. NORTON 

CHRISTOPHER F. MORIARTY 

28 Bridgeside Blvd. 

Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 

Telephone: 843/216-9000 

843/216-9450 (fax)

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

DATED: September 1, 2016 MORRISON & FOERSTER 

JORDAN ETH 

MARK R.S. FOSTER

s/ Mark R.S. Foster

 MARK R.S. FOSTER

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415/268-7000 

416/268-7522 (fax)

Attorneys for Defendants 

I, Matthew S. Melamed, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I 

hereby attest that Mark R.S. Foster has concurred in this filing. 

s/ Matthew S.Melamed

MATTHEW S. MELAMED

* * * 

O R D E R 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _________________________ ____________________________________ 

THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

(as modified on p. 2, 

line 20) 9/2/2016

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00347-EMC Document 96 Filed 09/02/16 Page 4 of 6
1182428_1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on September 1, 2016, I authorized the electronic filing of the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to 

the e-mail addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I 

caused to be mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the nonCM/ECF participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List. 

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 1, 2016. 

 s/ Matthew S. Melamed

 MATTHEW S. MELAMED 

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN 

 & DOWD LLP 

Post Montgomery Center 

One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415/288-4545 

415/288-4534 (fax) 

E-mail: mmelamed@rgrdlaw.com

Case 3:15-cv-00347-EMC Document 96 Filed 09/02/16 Page 5 of 6
Mailing Information for a Case 3:15-cv-00347-EMC In Re: LeapFrog Enterprise, Inc. Securities 

Litigation

Electronic Mail Notice List

The following are those who are currently on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case. 

• Ramzi Abadou 

ramzi.abadou@ksfcounsel.com,dawn.hartman@ksfcounsel.com

• Jordan Eth 

jeth@mofo.com,gmartinez@mofo.com,jrahman@mofo.com

• Mark R.S. Foster 

mfoster@mofo.com,lroiz@mofo.com,kmaccardle@mofo.com,rbarajas@mofo.com

• James Michael Hughes 

jhughes@motleyrice.com,erichards@motleyrice.com,kweil@motleyrice.com

• Jeremy A Lieberman 

jalieberman@pomlaw.com,disaacson@pomlaw.com,lpvega@pomlaw.com

• Matthew Seth Melamed 

mmelamed@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_SF@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_SD@rgrdlaw.com

• Brian O. O'Mara 

bo'mara@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com

• Robert Vincent Prongay 

rprongay@glancylaw.com,info@glancylaw.com,echang@glancylaw.com,bmurray@glancylaw.com

• Willow E. Radcliffe 

willowr@rgrdlaw.com,ptiffith@rgrdlaw.com,mmelamed@rgrdlaw.com,katerinap@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com

• Shawn A. Williams 

shawnw@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com

Manual Notice List

The following is the list of attorneys who are not on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case (who therefore require manual noticing). You may wish 

to use your mouse to select and copy this list into your word processing program in order to create notices or labels for these recipients. 

• (No manual recipients)

CAND-ECF- Page 1 of 1

https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/MailList.pl?689663438208172-L_1_0-1 8/31/2016

Case 3:15-cv-00347-EMC Document 96 Filed 09/02/16 Page 6 of 6