Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05169/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05169-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

J. Andrew Coombs (SBN 123881) 

Nicole L. Drey (SBN 250235) 

J. Andrew Coombs, A Professional Corporation 

517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202 

Glendale, California 91206 

Telephone: (818) 500-3200 

Facsimile: (818) 500-3201 

andy@coombspc.com

nicole@coombspc.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Adobe Systems Incorporated 

Lisa A. Rasmussen (SBN 207026) 

Law Office of Lisa Rasmussen 

616 South 8th Street 

Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 

Telephone: (702) 471-1436 

Facsimile: (702) 471-6540 

lisa@lrasmussenlaw.com

Attorney for Defendant 

Joshua Christenson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION) 

Adobe Systems Incorporated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Joshua Christenson, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C09-5169 PJH 

JOINT STIPULATION RE 

CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

Court: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

Previous Date: February 3, 2010 

New Date: February 10, 2010 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated (“Plaintiff”), by and through its counsel of record, and 

Defendant Joshua Christenson (“Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record, agree and 

stipulate as follows: 

 WHEREAS Defendant filed his Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) on or about December 21, 

2009; 

 WHEREAS Defendant’s Motion papers originally noticed the hearing date for February 10, 

2010, but Defendant then scheduled the hearing date for February 3, 2010, through ECF; 

Adobe v. Christenson: Stipulation to Continue Hearing on Motion - 1 - 

to Dismiss 

Case 4:09-cv-05169-PJH Document 16 Filed 01/11/10 Page 1 of 3
- 2 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Adobe v. Christenson: Stipulation to Continue Hearing on Motion 

to Dismiss 

 WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel calendared the hearing date for February 10, 2010, prior to 

leaving for the holidays; 

 WHEREAS Defendant subsequently filed an Amended Notice of Motion on or about 

December 24, 2009, correcting the hearing date for February 3, 2010; 

 WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel returned to the office on or about January 6, 2010, and 

immediately contacted Defendant’s counsel regarding the change in hearing dates; 

 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree that the hearing on Defendant’s Motion 

to Dismiss shall be continued to February 10, 2010, or such other date as may be acceptable to the 

Court, and that Plaintiff shall have through and until January 20, 2010, to file its opposition to 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED by the parties hereto: 

Dated: January 7, 2010 J. Andrew Coombs, A Professional Corp. 

By: ___/s/ Nicole L. Drey_________________

J. Andrew Coombs 

Nicole L. Drey 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated 

Dated: January 7, 2010 Law Office of Lisa Rasmussen 

By: ___Lisa A. Rasmussen________________

Lisa A. Rasmussen 

Attorneys for Defendant Joshua Christenson 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO REQUEST, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January ___, 2010 

Phyllis J. Hamilton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:09-cv-05169-PJH Document 16 Filed 01/11/10 Page 2 of 3
PROOF OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, certify and declare that I am over the age of 18 years, 

employed in the County of Los Angeles, and not a party to the above-entitled cause. I am 

employed by a member of the Bar of the United States District Court of California. My 

business address is 517 East Wilson Boulevard, Suite 202, Glendale, California 91206. 

On January 7, 2010, I served on the interested parties in this action with the: 

• JOINT STIPULATION RE CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON MOTION 

TO DISMISS 

for the following civil action: 

Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Christenson, et al.

by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope. I am readily familiar with the 

office's practice of collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that 

practice it would be deposited with the United States Postal Service on the same day 

with postage thereon fully prepaid at Glendale, California in the ordinary course of 

business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service presumed invalid if 

postal cancellation date or postage meter is more than one day after date of deposit for 

mailing in affidavit. 

Lisa A. Rasmussen 

Law Office of Lisa Rasmussen 

616 South 8th Street 

Las Vegas, NV 89101 

Place of Mailing: Glendale, California 

Executed on January 7, 2010, at Glendale, California 

_________/s/ Nicole L. Drey_________ 

Nicole L. Drey 

Case 4:09-cv-05169-PJH Document 16 Filed 01/11/10 Page 3 of 3