Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_13-cv-00198/USCOURTS-azd-4_13-cv-00198-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 210
Nature of Suit: Land Condemnation
Cause of Action: 28:1358 Land Condemnation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to

portions of the Report and Recommendation. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734,

739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

 5.62 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate

in Santa Cruz County, State of Arizona;

Landmark Title Assurance Agency of

Arizona, An Arizona LLC Under Trust

18223-T, et al., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 13-198-TUC-JAS (BGM) 

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge

Macdonald. In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Macdonald recommends

denying Plaintiff’s motion for consolidation. As the Court finds that the Report and

Recommendation appropriately recommended denying consolidation, the objections are

denied.1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 89) is accepted and

adopted. (2) Plaintiff’s motion for consolidation (Doc. 68) is denied.

DATED this 25th day of September, 2015.

Case 4:13-cv-00198-DCB Document 108 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 1