Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-00562/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-00562-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

LEONI Fiber Optics, Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Dr. Armin Kaus, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 13-562-PHX-SMM

ORDER SETTING RULE 16

PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE

This matter now being ready for a pretrial conference,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure a Preliminary Pretrial Conference is set for Tuesday, December 17, 2013, at 1:30

p.m. before the Honorable Stephen M. McNamee in Courtroom #605, sixth floor, Sandra

Day O’Connor U.S. Courthouse, 401 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona. 

* * * N O T I C E * * *

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:

 1. COUNSEL WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRIAL OF THE

LAWSUIT FOR EACH PARTY SHALL PERSONALLY APPEAR AND

PARTICIPATE IN THE PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE.

Counsel for all parties are directed to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure for the objectives of the conference. At least one of the attorneys

for each party attending the conference shall have authority to enter into

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 1 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

stipulations and make admissions regarding all matters which may be

discussed.

2. IN ADDITION TO COUNSEL OF RECORD, EACH PARTY, OR A

REPRESENTATIVE OF EACH PARTY (WHO IS NOT COUNSEL OF

RECORD) WITH BINDING SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY IF THE

PARTY IS AN ENTITY, SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE

PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. NO PARTY OR

COUNSEL SHALL BE EXCUSED FROM PERSONALLY APPEARING

AT THE CONFERENCE WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION OF THE

COURT. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f).

3. Counsel must be prepared to discuss what the parties must prove in order to

prevail on their respective claims or defenses at the time of the Preliminary

Pretrial Conference.

4. Counsel should be prepared to discuss logistical matters.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties are directed to meet at least twentyone days before the Preliminary Pretrial Conference, in accordance with Rule 26(f) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to discuss the following matters:

1. The possibility of consent to trial before a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the suitability for referral of this matter to this

District's court-annexed voluntary arbitration program or any other alternative dispute

resolution mechanism, or the reference of this matter to a special master;

2. Any matters relating to jurisdiction or venue or the joinder of additional

parties;

3. The nature and bases of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a

prompt settlement or resolution of the case;

4. A schedule of all pre-trial proceedings; 

5. Modification of pre-trial procedures due to the simplicity or complexity of the

case;

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 2 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

6. Arrangements for Initial Disclosures in compliance with Rule 26(a)(1) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Unless otherwise stipulated in writing by the

parties or otherwise directed by a written Order of this Court, Initial Disclosures shall

be made at the initial Rule 26(f) case management meeting or within fourteen (14)

days after the meeting; and

7. Any other matters which counsel may feel will help dispose of the matter in

an efficient manner.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 26(a) the parties shall file with the Clerk of the Court a Notice of Initial

Disclosure; copies of the actual disclosures shall therefore not be filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that at the Rule 26(f) case management meeting, the

parties shall develop a Proposed Case Management Plan which shall include brief

statements or proposals concerning:

1. The nature of the case, setting forth in brief statements the factual and legal

basis of Plaintiff's claims and Defendants’ defenses;

2. A list of the elements of proof necessary for each count of the complaint and

each affirmative defense. Where the burden of proof shifts, each party shall list the

elements of the claim or defense that the party must prove in order to prevail. The list

of the elements of proof must contain citations to relevant legal authority (i.e., United

States statutory and/or administrative law, U.S. Supreme Court case law, Ninth

Circuit Court of Appeals case law, Arizona state case and statutory law, or other

authority as dictated by conflicts of law rules);

3. The factual and legal issues genuinely in dispute, and whether they can be

narrowed by stipulation or motion;

4. The jurisdictional basis of the case, citing specific statutes;

5. Parties, if any, which have not been served, as well as parties which have not

filed an answer or other appearance. Unless counsel can otherwise show cause, a

proposed form of order shall accompany the joint Case Management Plan which

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 3 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The discovery deadline is the date by which all discovery must be completed.

Discovery requests must be served and depositions noticed sufficiently in advance of this

date to ensure reasonable completion by this deadline, including time to resolve discovery

disputes. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not entertain discovery disputes

after this deadline.

- 4 -

dismisses any party which has not been served, or seeks default judgment on any nonappearing party;

6. The names of parties not subject to the Court’s jurisdiction;

7. Whether there are further dispositive or partially dispositive issues to be

decided by pretrial motions, and the legal issues about which any pretrial motions are

contemplated;

8. Whether the case is suitable for reference to arbitration, to a special master, or

to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial;

9. The status of related cases pending before other judges of this Court or before

other courts;

10. Suggested changes, if necessary, in the timing, form, or requirement for

disclosures under Rule 26(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including a statement

of when Initial Disclosures were made or will be made;

11. Proposed specific dates for each of the following:

a. A deadline for the completion of fact discovery;1

b. Dates for full and complete expert disclosures under Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(A)-(C);

c. A deadline for completion of all expert depositions;

d. A deadline for filing dispositive motions;

e. A date by which the parties shall have engaged in good faith settlement

talks;

12. The scope of discovery and whether discovery should be conducted in phases

or should be limited to or focused upon particular issues. For example, where

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 4 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 5 -

dispositive motions will be filed (e.g., motions for summary judgment or a defense

relying on the statute of limitations) counsel should consider limiting discovery to the

issue at hand until the court has ruled on the motion; 

13. Suggested changes, if any, in the limitations on discovery imposed by the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LRCiv 16.2;

14. Estimated date that the case will be ready for trial, the estimated length of trial,

and any suggestions for shortening the trial;

15. Whether a jury trial has been requested and whether the request for a jury trial

is contested. If the request for a jury trial is contested, the Proposed Case

Management Plan shall set forth the reasons that a trial by jury is in dispute;

16. The prospects for settlement, including any request to have a settlement

conference before another United States District Court Judge or Magistrate Judge, or

other request of the court for assistance in settlement efforts; and

17. Any other matters which counsel feel will aid the Court in resolving this

dispute in a just, speedy, and inexpensive manner.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all deadlines to which the parties stipulate in the

Proposed Case Management Plan shall fall on a Friday barring extenuating circumstances

which make doing so impracticable.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall jointly file their Proposed Case

Management Plan with the Clerk of the Court not less than five business days before the

Preliminary Pretrial Conference. Absent extraordinary circumstances, no extensions of time

will be granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that it is the responsibility of counsel for the Plaintiff

to initiate the communications necessary to prepare the joint Proposed Case Management

Plan. Once contacted by counsel for Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants shall act in an

expeditious manner to effectuate the preparation of the Case Management Plan.

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 5 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 6 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for all parties are expected to comply

with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and to minimize the expense of

discovery.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court, after consultation with counsel and the

parties, will enter a Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order concerning, inter alia, discovery and

dispositive motions. (See Attached) To the extent that the Court’s Rule 16 Scheduling Order

differs from the parties’ Proposed Case Management Plan, the provisions of the Court’s

Order shall supersede the parties’ Proposed Case Management Plan and shall control the

course of this action unless modified by subsequent Order of this Court. The parties and their

counsel are all cautioned that the deadlines set in the Rule 16 Scheduling Order shall be

strictly enforced.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel review the requirements of LRCiv 7.1

and LRCiv 7.2, Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of

Arizona, with their administrative/support personnel to ensure that all pleadings are in

compliance with the rules.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court views the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference as critical to its case management responsibilities and the responsibilities of the

parties under Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH EVERY PROVISION OF THIS ORDER MAY LEAD TO SANCTIONS

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 16(f).

DATED this 15th day of November, 2013.

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 6 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

LEONI Fiber Optics, Inc.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Dr. Armin Kaus, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-13-562-PHX-SMM

RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER

On December 17, 2013, a Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in Court pursuant

to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Prior to the conference, the parties

filed a Rule 26(f) Case Management Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Case Management

Plan, and the representations made by the parties at the Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial

Conference, all parties were ordered to comply with the deadlines established in this Order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the current provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure shall apply to all proceedings concerning this case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all Initial Disclosures as defined in Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 26(a), if not already exchanged prior to the time of this Preliminary

Pretrial Conference, shall be made no later than five (5) days after date of entry of this

Order or, in the alternative, no later than ________________________________________.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 26(a), the parties shall file with the Clerk of the Court a Notice of Initial

Disclosure, rather than copies of the actual disclosures.

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 7 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any amendment to the Complaint shall be filed

no later than ____________________________________________. Any amendment to the

Answer shall be filed no later than __________________________________________.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all discovery, answers to interrogatories, and supplements to interrogatories must be completed by ___________________________. In no

event, however, shall this provision alter the duties and obligations imposed upon the parties

by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e). This Order contemplates that each party will

conduct discovery in such a manner as to complete, within the deadline, any and all

discovery. “Last minute” or “eleventh hour” discovery which results in insufficient time to

undertake additional discovery and which requires an extension of the discovery deadline

will be met with disfavor, and could result in denial of an extension, exclusion of evidence,

or the imposition of other sanctions.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery by interrogatory shall generally be

governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33. However, notwithstanding Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 33, there is a limit of _____________ interrogatories, including discrete

subparts, applicable to this case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that requests for admissions shall be governed by

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36. The parties shall serve no more than 

requests for admissions.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED reminding counsel of their duty under Rule 26(e) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to supplement all Rule 26(a) disclosures and responses

to discovery requests. Pursuant to Rule 26(e)(1), any additions or other changes to

information previously disclosed must be made prior to the time that Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial

Disclosures are due. Since this Court effectively requires all Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial

Disclosures to be contained in the Proposed Final Pretrial Order, this Order contemplates that

all exhibits and witnesses that may be offered at trial will have been disclosed before the

close of discovery as established by the provisions of this Order. This Order therefore

supersedes the “thirty-day before trial” disclosure deadline contained in that Rule. Therefore

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 8 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 The parties are hereby given notice that this Order requires disclosure greater

than that required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).

- 3 -

(1) failure to have timely supplemented a Rule 26(a) disclosure, including but not limited to

witnesses and exhibits, or (2) a failure to have timely supplemented responses to any valid

discovery requests, or (3) attempting to include any witnesses or exhibits in the Proposed

Final Pretrial Order that were not previously disclosed in a timely manner as to allow for

meaningful discovery prior to the discovery cutoff date as established by this Order, may

result in the exclusion of such evidence at trial or the imposition of other sanctions. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event of a discovery dispute, the parties

shall contact the Court to request a telephonic conference prior to filing any discovery

motions. The parties shall not contact the Court regarding a discovery dispute unless they

have been unable to resolve the dispute themselves, despite personal consultation and sincere

efforts to do so. The parties shall not file any written materials related to a discovery dispute

or discovery motion without express leave of Court. If the Court does order written

submissions, the movant shall include a statement certifying that counsel could not

satisfactorily resolve the matter despite personal consultation and sincere efforts to do so, in

accordance with LRCiv 7.2(j) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for

the District of Arizona. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff(s) shall disclose the identity of any

person who may be used at trial to present evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 701,

702, 703, 704, and 705 no later than ___________________________________________.1

The Defendant(s) shall disclose the identity of any person who may be used at trial to present

evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 701, 702, 703, 704, or 705 no later than

___________________________________. Rebuttal experts if any, shall be disclosed no

later than _____________________________. No deposition of any expert witnesses shall

occur before the disclosures concerning expert witnesses mandated by this Order are made.

Depositions of all expert witnesses must be concluded by ___________________.

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 9 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 The Court finds that a presumptive limit of seven (7) hours is sufficient for

depositions in a standard track civil case.

- 4 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the disclosures of the identities of any persons

who may be used at trial to present evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 701, 702, 703,

704, or 705 shall also include all of the disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) if the witness is either (1) retained or specifically employed to provide

expert testimony in the case, or (2) is an agent or employee of the party offering the

testimony whose duties regularly involve giving expert testimony.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that depositions shall be limited as provided by Rules

30 and 31 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure unless the parties otherwise stipulate in

writing when permitted to do so pursuant to the Rules or when granted permission to depart

from the provisions of the Rules by Order of this Court. Notwithstanding any provision in

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules, the parties shall conduct no more

than _________________ depositions. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(d)(1)

that there shall be a time limit of hours2

 to conduct a deposition of any witness

in this case. Additional time shall be allowed where the deponent or a party impedes or

delays the examination. This time limit may only be extended by Order of this Court upon

motion of any party that demonstrates good cause for doing so. Counsel shall conduct

themselves courteously and professionally, especially during the taking of depositions. Any

objections made during the course of a deposition must be in accordance with Rule 30(c)(2)

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that notwithstanding any provisions of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure or any other provisions of this Order, non-party witnesses shall not

be permitted to attend, either physically, electronically, or otherwise, the deposition of any

other witness in this case without an Order of this Court to the contrary.

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 10 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 5 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all dispositive motions shall be filed no later than

__________________________________. Such motions must be, in all respects, in full

compliance with the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of

Arizona. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no submissions to the Court shall contain any

footnotes in excess of five (5) lines.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties are hereby specifically admonished that

failure to respond to a motion by serving and filing an answering memorandum within the

time period expressly provided for in LRCiv 7.2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States

District Court for the District of Arizona may be deemed a consent to the denial or granting

of the motion and the Court may then dispose of the motion summarily.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall not notice oral argument on any

motion. Instead, a party desiring oral argument on a motion shall request argument by

placing “Oral Argument Requested” immediately below the title of such motion, pursuant

to LRCiv 7.2(f) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District

of Arizona. The Court will then issue a minute order scheduling the oral argument.

Oral argument shall be scheduled at the request of a party on all motions to dismiss

and motions for summary judgment. On all other motions on which a party requests oral

argument, the Court will determine whether oral argument is necessary. FURTHER, THE

PARTIES ARE REMINDED THAT OBTAINING A HEARING DATE IS PURELY

ADMINISTERIAL. ACCORDINGLY, REGARDLESS OF A HEARING DATE, THE

COURT MAY, AT ANY TIME AFTER THE MOTION IS FULLY BRIEFED,

DETERMINE THAT A HEARING IS UNWARRANTED AND RULE ON THE MOTION

WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any and all motions, requests, or stipulations for

extensions of time shall be made in accordance with the provisions of LRCiv 7.3 of the Rules

of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Notwithstanding

this directive, however, if such a motion, request, or stipulation seeks an extension of time

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 11 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 6 -

in which to file a memorandum in response or in reply to a motion previously noticed for oral

argument, under no circumstances shall such a motion, request, or stipulation seek an

extension that would preclude the Court from having at least thirty (30) days from the due

date for the filing of the reply memorandum to consider the merits of the underlying motion

unless the motion, request, or stipulation also seeks to vacate and reschedule the oral

argument. Any motion, request, or stipulation that so seeks both an extension of time and

rescheduling of a hearing shall contain a memorandum of points and authorities which

demonstrates good cause for the Court to grant the requested extension.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if no dispositive motions are pending before the

Court after the dispositive motions deadline has passed, Plaintiff(s) shall file a Notice of

Readiness for Order Re: Final Pretrial Conference within ten (10) days of the dispositive

motions deadline. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if dispositive motions are pending before the

Court following the dispositive motions deadline, the Court will issue an Order Re: Final

Pretrial Conference following its resolution of the dispositive motions, if necessary. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order Re: Final Pretrial Conference shall: 1)

set deadlines for the filing of and response to motions in limine; 2) instruct the parties on

their duties in preparing for the Final Pretrial Conference and for trial; and 3) include a form

for the completion of the parties’ Proposed Pretrial Form of Order.

IT IS ORDERED that the attorneys for each party who will be responsible for trial

of the lawsuit shall APPEAR and PARTICIPATE in a Final Pretrial Conference on

______________________________________________ at _________________, ___.m.

in courtroom # 605 on the sixth floor of the United States Courthouse, 401 West Washington

Street, Phoenix, Arizona. Because the Final Pretrial Conference is held for the benefit of all

parties, and further because the presence of all parties will facilitate frank discussion of the

pertinent issues in the lawsuit, each party, or a representative with binding settlement

authority if the party is an entity, shall attend the Final Pretrial Conference. At the Final

Pretrial Conference, the Court shall set a firm trial date.

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 12 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 7 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall keep the Court informed

regarding the possibility of settlement and should settlement be reached, the parties shall file

a Notice of Settlement with the Clerk of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court views compliance with the provisions

of this Order as critical to its case management responsibilities and the responsibilities of the

parties under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:

__________________________________ __________________________________

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Rule 16 Scheduling Order jointly submitted

by the parties is hereby APPROVED and is thereby ADOPTED as the Scheduling Order

of this Court.

DATED this __ day of ____________________, ______.

______________________________________

Stephen M. McNamee

Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:13-cv-00562-SMM Document 68 Filed 11/15/13 Page 13 of 13