Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05868/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05868-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ROSALINA C. RELENTE and TRAVIS R. 

ANDERSON, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

VIATOR, INC., a corporation, and DOES 1-100, 

inclusive, 

Defendant. 

Case No. CV 12-05868 JD

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] FINAL 

JUDGMENT

The Court has signed and entered its Final Order Approving Settlement and Dismissing 

Claims of Settlement Class Members with Prejudice (the “Order”) in the above-captioned matter 

with respect to the following class of persons: All persons with California billing addresses who 

purchased a Viator tour worldwide from October 16, 2008 through June 7, 2014 when a 

Strikethrough Price was displayed with no Special Offer Text.

Accordingly:

JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 58(a), as to the above-specified class of persons, Plaintiffs Rosalina Relente and Travis 

Anderson, and Defendant Viator, Inc. on the terms and conditions of the Stipulation of Class 

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT

CASE NO. CV 12-05868 JD

sf- 3426671

Case 3:12-cv-05868-JD Document 111 Filed 07/09/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Action Settlement and Release (“Settlement Agreement”) approved by the Order.

The Court, for purposes of this Final Judgment, adopts the terms and definitions set 

forth in the Settlement Agreement. 

1. Viator shall make the payments on the terms and conditions specified in the 

Settlement Agreement. These payments shall include the amounts awarded in the Court’s 

order dated June 9, 2015, $500,000 in attorney’s fees and $22,256.50 in costs. The Court 

also awarded costs to the named Plaintiffs for any out-of-pocket costs and any work missed, 

which Viator will pay in the amounts of $744 to Rosalina Relente and $2,024 to Travis 

Anderson. 

2. Payments and benefits to Settlement Class Members shall be made from the 

Settlement Fund on the terms and conditions specified in the Settlement Agreement.

3. The Class Representatives and Settlement Class Members are permanently 

barred and enjoined from initiating, asserting and/or prosecuting any action or proceeding 

that involves or asserts any of the Released Claims against any of the Released Persons.

4. Viator is enjoined from displaying a Strikethrough Price for a product on its 

website or mobile apps without also displaying text that accurately describes what the 

Strikethrough Price is based on. A Strikethrough Price is a price for a Viator product with a 

line through it displayed on Viator’s website or mobile apps. 

5. Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment in any way, the Court 

reserves exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over the Action, the Class Representatives, the 

Settlement Class Members, and Viator for the purposes of supervising the implementation, 

enforcement, construction, and interpretation of the Settlement Agreement, the Order, and 

this Final Judgment. 

6. The Settlement Agreement, the Final Order Approving Settlement and 

Dismissing Claims of Settlement Class Members with Prejudice, and this Final Judgment are 

not admissions of liability or fault by Viator or the Released Persons, or a finding of the 

validity of any claims in the Action or of any wrongdoing or violation of law by Viator or the 

Released Persons. The Settlement Agreement and settlement are not a concession by the 

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 2 

CASE NO. CV 12-05868 JD

sf- 3426671

Case 3:12-cv-05868-JD Document 111 Filed 07/09/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Parties, and, to the extent permitted by law, neither this Final Judgment, nor any of its terms 

or provisions, nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be offered 

as evidence or received in evidence in any pending or future civil, criminal, or administrative 

action or proceeding to establish any liability of, or admission by, Viator, the Released 

Persons, or any of them. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Final Judgment shall 

be interpreted to prohibit the use of this Final Judgment in a proceeding to consummate or 

enforce the Settlement Agreement or Final Judgment, or to defend against the assertion of 

Released Claims in any other proceeding, or as otherwise required by law.

JUDGMENT APPROVED AS TO FORM: 

By:

___________________________________________ 

HONORABLE JAMES DONATO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

JUDGMENT ENTERED: ______________ 

By: CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 3 

CASE NO. CV 12-05868 JD

sf- 3426671

July 8, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge James Donato

Case 3:12-cv-05868-JD Document 111 Filed 07/09/15 Page 3 of 3