Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02513/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02513-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CITIZENS FOR FREE SPEECH, LLC, 

ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,

Defendant. /

No. C14-02513 CRB

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

RESUBMIT MOTION UNDER

SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

On January 13, 2016, the Court received Defendant’s motion fashioned “Defendant

County of Alameda’s Notice of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Dissolution of

Preliminary Injunction” (Motion) (dkt 72). Oppositions and replies were timely filed. Based

on the briefing filed by both parties and the arguments contained therein, the Court believes

that summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 is a more appropriate

vehicle for consideration of the remaining issues in this case. The parties are directed to

resubmit their briefing on the merits under that standard and in accordance with the Court’s

Local Rules. 

//

Case 3:14-cv-02513-CRB Document 80 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants’ Motion is therefore DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant

seeking to dissolve the injunction in this matter. The motion hearing currently set for

February 26, 2016 at 10:00 A.M. is hereby vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 22, 2016 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-02513-CRB Document 80 Filed 02/22/16 Page 2 of 2