Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00331/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00331-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0331 LKK DAD PS

vs.

MARK PERCIN, ORDER

Defendant.

 /

MARK DAVID PERCIN

Cross-Complainant,

vs.

AMERICAN EXPRESS FSB, et al.,

Cross-Defendants.

 /

Defendant/cross-complainant Mark Percin is proceeding pro se in the aboveentitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local

Rule 302(c)(21).

On February 23, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any

Case 2:10-cv-00331-LKK -DAD Document 9 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The

fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed an objection to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 23, 2010 (Doc. No. 8) are

adopted in full; and

2. This action is summarily remanded to the Nevada County Superior Court for

lack of jurisdiction.

DATED: March 22, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-00331-LKK -DAD Document 9 Filed 03/22/10 Page 2 of 2