Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03531/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03531-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY

COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AND

SAN MATEO CREDIT UNION,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-03531 WHA

ORDER DENYING

STIPULATION SELECTING

ADR PROCESS

At the case management conference held on September 14, 2006, the Court offered to

provide an ADR reference. The parties spurned that offer and stated a preference for a private

mediator, which the Court allowed. It is now too late to backtrack. The case is set for trial on

April 9, 2007. There is no judge available between now and the trial date to work this case into

our ADR services. Counsel should take this into account in their next case before this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 14, 2006. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-03531-WHA Document 30 Filed 12/14/06 Page 1 of 1