Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00988/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00988-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH SCHULTZ,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 

 Defendants.

Case No. 1:11-cv-00988-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING 

DEFENDANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS FOR 

FAILURE TO EXHAUST 

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

(ECF No. 38)

CASE TO REMAIN OPEN

Plaintiff Kenneth Schultz, a state prisoner incarcerated at Corcoran State Prison 

(CSP), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of California.

On October 30, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations

(ECF No. 38) that Defendant Kim’s September 30, 2013 motion to dismiss as unexhausted 

the medical indifference claim as to events subsequent to July 22, 2009 (ECF No. 30) be 

denied. Any objection to the findings and recommendations was due by due by November 

18, 2013. (Id.) The November 18, 2013 deadline passed without any party filing objections 

Case 1:11-cv-00988-DAD-MJS Document 41 Filed 11/21/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

or seeking further extension of time to do so. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court 

finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court adopts the findings and recommendations filed on October 30, 

2013 (ECF No. 38) in full,

2. Defendant Kim’s September 30, 2013 motion to dismiss as unexhausted the 

medical indifference claim as to events subsequent to July 22, 2009 (ECF No. 

30) is DENIED, and

3. This case shall remain open.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 20, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00988-DAD-MJS Document 41 Filed 11/21/13 Page 2 of 2