Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00226/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00226-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONOVAN L. HALEY,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,

et al.,

 Defendants.

1:13-cv-00226-AWI-GSA-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 16.)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH 

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A 

CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY 

BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT 

TO 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g)

ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

Donovan L. Haley (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 7, 2015, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that this 

action be dismissed based on Plaintiff=s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be 

granted under §1983. Plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file objections to the 

findings and recommendations. Plaintiff requested and was granted a thirty-day extension of 

time to file objections. (Docs. 17, 18.) Plaintiff’s latest deadline has now expired, and Plaintiff 

has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.

Case 1:13-cv-00226-AWI-GSA Document 19 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

including plaintiff’s objections, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 7, 

2015, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on plaintiff=s failure to state a 

claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983;

3. This dismissal is subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. '

1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011); and

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 1, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00226-AWI-GSA Document 19 Filed 07/02/15 Page 2 of 2