Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06349/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06349-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)GUILLERMO VERA, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

STUART J. RYAN, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:04-cv-06349-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 13)

ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1) AND

MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS (Docs. 8, 9, 10,

and 11)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 1, 2004, Petitioner filed the instant Petition. (Doc. 1). On May 2, 2005, the

United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendations that the Petition be

dismissed with prejudice as untimely and in violation of the one-year statute of limitations in 28

U.S.C. § 2244(d). (Doc. 13). The Report and Recommendations were served on all parties and

Case 1:04-cv-06349-OWW -TAG Document 25 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty days from the date of service of

that order. (Id.). On May 11, 2005, nine days after the Court issued its Report and

Recommendations, Petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for

the Ninth Circuit. (Doc. 14). On July 11, 2005, while his appeal was pending, Petitioner filed

objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 22). On September

12, 2005, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Petitioner's request for a certificate of

appealability. (Doc. 23). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations are

supported by the record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations issued May 2, 2005 (Doc. 13), are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; 

3. The miscellaneous motions addressed in the Report and Recommendations (Docs. 8,

9, 10, and 11), are DENIED as MOOT; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close

the file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06349-OWW -TAG Document 25 Filed 09/27/05 Page 2 of 2