Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05337/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05337-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID WIT, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, 

Defendant. 

GARY ALEXANDER, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 14-cv-02346-JCS 

Related Case No. 14-cv-05337 JCS 

ORDER TO LODGE PRIVILEGED 

COMMUNICATIONS SOUGHT IN 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 

Re: Dkt. No. 98 (Case No. 14-cv-02346 JCS) 

& 63 (Case No. 14-cv-05337 JCS) 

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant United Behavioral 

Health to Produce Documents Improperly Redacted or Withheld as Privileged (“Motion”). A 

hearing on the Motion is scheduled for January 22, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. The Court has not yet 

decided whether it will conduct an in camera review of the communications that are the subject of 

the parties’ dispute. To avoid delay in resolving the dispute, however, the Court requests that 

UBH lodge the unredacted communications that are listed on its October 30, 2015 privilege log so 

that the Court will be able to conduct a prompt review in the event it determines that in camera

review is appropriate. The documents may be lodge by emailing them as attachments, in pdf 

format, to JCSPO@cand.uscourts.gov. The Court requests that the documents be grouped into the 

nine categories used by the parties in their briefs, with each group of documents sent in a separate 

Case 3:14-cv-05337-JCS Document 77 Filed 12/31/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

em

par

etc

cor

por

har

soo

Da

mail with a he

rties’ briefs f

c.). Each doc

rresponding 

rtion of the d

rd copies of 

on as possibl

IT IS S

ated: Decem

eader contain

for the attach

cument shou

number on t

document fo

the documen

le and no lat

SO ORDER

mber 31, 2015

ning the case

hed documen

uld include th

the October 

or which atto

nts. Defend

ter than Thur

RED. 

5

2

e names and

nts (e.g., “Tr

he original B

30, 2015 pri

orney-client p

ants are requ

rsday, Janua

___

JO

Ch

d numbers an

riana Memo

Bates stamp 

ivilege log a

privilege is c

uested to lod

ary 7, 2016.

__________

OSEPH C. SP

hief Magistra

nd the catego

orandum,” “I

numbers as 

and should cl

claimed. U

dge the docu

.

___________

PERO 

ate Judge 

ory name use

IOP CDGs Q

well as the 

learly indica

BH need no

uments electr

__________

ed in the 

Question,” 

ate the 

t provide 

ronically as 

________ 

Case 3:14-cv-05337-JCS Document 77 Filed 12/31/15 Page 2 of 2