Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_96-cv-04179/USCOURTS-cand-3_96-cv-04179-63/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 20:1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 This allocation will cover two budgets: (1) the RSIP implementation budget, and (2)

the Monitor’s Office budget.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EMMA C. et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DELAINE EASTIN, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C96-4179 TEH

ORDER RE PROCESS FOR

MAKING ALLOCATION FOR

FISCAL YEAR 2010-11

A new fiscal year will commence on July 1, 2010. The Court hopes that Defendants

will be able to agree upon an equitable allocation for fiscal year 2010-2011 without

intervention from the Court, in light of the guidance provided by this Court’s May 14, 2003

Order Re Initial Allocation, and their past successes in reaching agreement.1

 In the event

that informal resolution is not possible, the Court will make an equitable allocation.

To facilitate the allocation process in a timely manner, the Court sets forth the

following schedule:

1. By no later than March 1, 2010, Ravenswood and the Court Monitor shall each

submit their respective proposed budgets to the Court and the parties.

2. The Defendants shall, as soon as possible thereafter, meet and confer in good

faith to seek an agreement upon an equitable allocation for the fiscal year 2010-11.

Case 3:96-cv-04179-VC Document 1481 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Defendants shall, by no later than Friday, May 7, 2010, file either a joint

statement setting forth an agreed upon allocation for fiscal year 2010-11 or, if no agreement

has been reached, separate opening briefs setting forth their respective positions with respect

to an appropriate allocation. 

4. If the parties have not reached agreement, Defendants shall respond to each

other’s opening briefs by no later than Friday, May 21, 2010. To the extent that Plaintiffs

wish to address this matter, they may file comments responding to Defendants’ opening

briefs no later than Friday, May 21, 2010. The Court shall hold a hearing on the allocation

issue, if necessary, on Wednesday, June 2, 2010, at 10:00AM.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 1/29/10 

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:96-cv-04179-VC Document 1481 Filed 01/29/10 Page 2 of 2