Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00064/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00064-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMUEL VAN NORTON CHAPMAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0064 LKK DAD P

vs.

DONALD C. BYRD, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Recent court orders served on plaintiff at his address of record were returned by

the postal service marked “Paroled.” It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local

Rule 83-182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any

address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

plaintiff’s failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f)

and 11-110.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after these findings and recommendations are served, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to

Case 2:05-cv-00064-LKK -DAD Document 13 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal

the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 19, 2006.

DAD:13:mp

chap0064.33a

Case 2:05-cv-00064-LKK -DAD Document 13 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2