Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00822/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00822-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: VIZIO, INC., CONSUMER PRIVACY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2693

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −1)

On April 7, 2016, the Panel transferred 9 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Central District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1407. See (J.P.M.L. ). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been transferred to the

Central District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to

the Honorable Josephine L. Staton.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Central District of California and assigned to

Judge Staton.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the

Central District of California for the reasons stated in the order of April 7, 2016, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Josephine L. Staton.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Central District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall

be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

Case 4:16-cv-00822-HSG Document 23 Filed 04/20/16 Page 1 of 2 Case MDL No. 2693 Document 106 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 2
IN RE: VIZIO, INC., CONSUMER PRIVACY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2693

SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 16−00822 Tongarm v. Vizio, Inc. et al

CAN 3 16−01201 Von Haden v. Vizio, Inc. et al

INDIANA SOUTHERN

INS 1 16−00381 STRADER v. VIZIO, INC.

Case 4:16-cv-00822-HSG Document 23 Filed 04/20/16 Page 2 of 2 Case MDL No. 2693 Document 106 Filed 04/18/16 Page 2 of 2