Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02136/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02136-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AARON JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BRIAN DUFFY, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-2136 AC P 

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 

 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 

service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which provides that 

“[i]f mail directed to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk is returned by the U.S. Postal 

Service, and if such plaintiff fails to notify the Court and opposing parties within sixty-three (63) 

days thereafter of a current address, the Court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure 

to prosecute.” More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the 

postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the court of a current address. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the court randomly assign a 

United States District Judge to this action; and 

 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for 

failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

Case 2:13-cv-02136-JAM-AC Document 18 Filed 01/26/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 

days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: January 23, 2015 

Case 2:13-cv-02136-JAM-AC Document 18 Filed 01/26/15 Page 2 of 2