Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05414/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05414-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUNICE L. PARQUET, SR.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT,

et al.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-5414 BZ

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Plaintiff did not file a statement or appear at the March

3, 2008 case management conference. Nor did plaintiff file

further information in support of her in forma pauperis

application, as required by my Orders dated November 1, 2007

and January 9, 2008. On February 2, 2008, my deputy clerk

sent correspondence to plaintiff requesting that she consent

or decline my jurisdiction. Again, plaintiff failed to

respond. 

Since filing the complaint, application to proceed in

forma pauperis, and filing a request for accommodations on

October 23, 2007, plaintiff has failed to take any further

Case 3:07-cv-05414-MHP Document 9 Filed 03/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

steps to prosecute this action. Accordingly, plaintiff is

HEREBY ORDERED to either dismiss this action or appear in

person and show cause why this case should not be dismissed

for lack of prosecution on Wednesday, April 2, 2008, at 

10:00 a.m., in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450

Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102. 

Dated: March 4, 2008

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\PARQUET\OSC RE DISMISSAL.wpd

Case 3:07-cv-05414-MHP Document 9 Filed 03/04/08 Page 2 of 2