Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01189/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01189-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LISA LEONARD,

Plaintiff,

v. 

COUNTY OF LASSEN, 

Defendant.

No. 2:23-CV-1189-KJM-DMC

ORDER

 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. 

 A settlement conference is scheduled before the undersigned for October 22, 2024, 

at 11:30 a.m., via Zoom. On or before October 15, 2024, the parties must execute and file the 

attached Waiver of Disqualification to allow the undersigned to conduct the settlement 

conference. If waivers are not filed by all parties participating in the settlement conference by 

this date, the hearing will be vacated and, on the parties’ joint request, the matter will be referred 

to another Magistrate Judge for purposes of conducting a settlement conference. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 24, 2024 

____________________________________ 

DENNIS M. COTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:23-cv-01189-KJM-DMC Document 20 Filed 09/25/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LISA LEONARD,

Plaintiff,

v. 

COUNTY OF LASSEN, 

Defendant.

No. 2:23-CV-1189-KJM-DMC

WAIVER OF DISQUALIFICATION

 Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 270(b), the parties to the 

herein action affirmatively request that the assigned Magistrate Judge participate in the settlement 

conference and further, the parties waive any claim of disqualification to Judge Cota thereafter 

hearing and determining matters in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302. 

DATED: ______________ ____________________________________ 

 By: For Plaintiff(s)

DATED: ______________ ____________________________________ 

 By: For defendant(s) 

Case 2:23-cv-01189-KJM-DMC Document 20 Filed 09/25/24 Page 2 of 2