Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00669/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00669-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TYRONE EDWARD HICKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-0669 CKD PS (TEMP)

ORDER

This action came before the court on June 29, 2016, for hearing of plaintiff’s motion to

compel compliance.

1

 Attorney Kelly Trujillo appeared on behalf of the defendants and plaintiff 

Tyrone Hicks appeared on his own behalf. 

Plaintiff’s May 24, 2016 motion to compel seeks an order requiring defendants to fully 

comply with the court’s January 22, 2016 order granting plaintiff’s motion to compel the 

production of documents. (Dkt. No. 44.) In this regard, plaintiff seeks additional discovery 

which plaintiff contends defendants should have produced in response to the court’s January 22, 

2016 order. 

Although it is arguable that the defendants should have produced the information at issue 

in complying with the court’s January 22, 2016 order, at the June 29, 2016 hearing, plaintiff was 

 

1

The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. ' 636(c)(1). (Dkt. No. 25.)

Case 2:14-cv-00669-DB Document 103 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

unable to explain why plaintiff failed to bring this motion sooner or how this evidence would aid 

plaintiff’s prosecution of this action. Moreover, ordering defendants to produce the discovery at 

issue would require a considerable delay in this action and this matter has already been delayed 

on several prior occasions. 

Accordingly, upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, 

and for the reasons set forth on the record at that hearing and stated above, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that plaintiff’s May 24, 2016 motion to compel (Dkt. No. 94) is denied. 

Dated: June 30, 2016

BVD\hicks0669.oah.062916.docx

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-00669-DB Document 103 Filed 06/30/16 Page 2 of 2