Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00552/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00552-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD B. McNEARNEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0552 GEB GGH PS

vs.

U.S. BANKCORP, INC.,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed June 5, 2006, defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted, and

plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. The thirty day period has

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

court’s order.

For the reasons given in the June 5, 2006, order, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

Case 2:06-cv-00552-GEB-GGH Document 21 Filed 07/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 7/26/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

mcnearney.fta

Case 2:06-cv-00552-GEB-GGH Document 21 Filed 07/27/06 Page 2 of 2