Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00740/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00740-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

770100 v1/PA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 

CASE NO C07-00740 SI

COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP 

WILLIAM S. FREEMAN (82002) (freemanws@cooley.com) 

JESSICA VALENZUELA SANTAMARIA (220934) (jsantamaria@cooley.com) 

BENJAMIN D. SINGERMAN (242725) (bsingerman@cooley.com) 

Five Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 

Telephone: (650) 843-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 857-0663 

Attorneys for Defendants 

GERALD BALDWIN, HILARY BILLINGS, 

GORDON A. BOWKER, MICHAEL CLOUTIER,

JAMES E. GRIMES, H. WILLIAM JESSE, 

WILLIAM M. LILLA, BRUCE A. MACLAREN, 

DEBORAH McGRAW, PETER B. MEHRBERG, 

CHRISTOPHER P. MOTTERN, PATRICK O’DEA, 

JAMES A. REYNOLDS, MARK N. RUDOLPH, 

JEAN-MICHEL VALETTE, WILLIAM D. WELSH 

and

PEET’S COFFEE & TEA, INC., Nominal Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MARVIN W. NACH, derivatively on behalf 

of PEET’S COFFEE & TEA, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

GERALD BALDWIN, HILARY BILLINGS, 

GORDON A. BOWKER, MICHAEL 

CLOUTIER, JAMES E. GRIMES, H. 

WILLIAM JESSE, WILLIAM M. LILLA, 

BRUCE A. MACLAREN, DEBORAH 

McGRAW, PETER B. MEHRBERG, 

CHRISTOPHER P. MOTTERN, PATRICK 

O’DEA, JAMES A. REYNOLDS, MARK N. 

RUDOLPH, JEAN-MICHEL VALETTE, 

WILLIAM D. WELSH, 

Defendants

PEET’S COFFEE & TEA, INC.,

Nominal Defendant. 

Case No. C07-00740 SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

Case 3:07-cv-00740-SI Document 64 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-00740-SI Document 70 Filed 03/21/08 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

770100 v1/PA 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 

CASE NO C07-00740 SI 

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, on February 5, 2007, Plaintiff Marvin W. Nach (“Plaintiff”) filed a 

Complaint with this Court commencing the above captioned action against Defendants Gerald 

Baldwin, Hilary Billings, Michael Cloutier, James E. Grimes, H. William Jesse, William M. Lilla, 

Bruce A. MacLaren, Deborah McGraw, Peter B. Mehrberg, Christopher P. Mottern, Patrick 

O’Dea, James A. Reynolds, Mark N. Rudolph, Jean-Michel Valette, William D. Welsh, and 

Nominal Defendant Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”); and 

WHEREAS, on October 12, 2007, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint against 

Defendants; and 

WHEREAS, on February 12, 2008, the Court entered its Order granting Defendants’ 

Motions to Dismiss, dismissing Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint with leave to file an amended 

complaint, and directed that any amended complaint be filed on or before February 29, 2008; and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has elected not to amend his complaint; and 

WHEREAS, all parties and their counsel respectfully submit to the Court that each of 

them, and, to the best of their knowledge, each of their opposing parties and opposing counsel 

have at all times complied with the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b); 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all parties, by their 

undersigned counsel, hereby jointly request and stipulate as follows: 

1. That the Court enter its Order dismissing this action in its entirety, with prejudice, 

as to all Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees 

associated with the prosecution and defense of this action; 

2. That the Court enter its findings regarding the parties’ compliance with Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 11(b) in a separate order as required by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(c)(1) and Civil L.R. 58-1. 

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:07-cv-00740-SI Document 64 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-00740-SI Document 70 Filed 03/21/08 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

770100 v1/PA 2.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 

CASE NO C07-00740 SI 

3. That upon entry of the Court’s orders of dismissal with prejudice and compliance 

with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b), the Clerk of Court may enter a final judgment in this action. 

Dated: March 18, 2008 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP 

WILLIAM S. FREEMAN (82002) 

JESSICA VALENZUELA SANTAMARIA (220934) 

BENJAMIN D. SINGERMAN (242725) 

 /s/ 

William S. Freeman (82002) 

Attorneys for Defendants and Nominal Defendant 

Dated: March 18, 2008 SCHIFFRIN BARROWAY TOPAZ 

 & KESSLER, LLP 

ALAN R. PLUTZIK, OF COUNSEL (077785) 

ROBERT M. BRAMSON, OF COUNSEL (102006) 

L. TIMOTHY FISHER (191626) 

 /s/ 

2125 Oak Grove Road, Suite 120 

Walnut Creek, CA 94598 

Telephone: (925) 945-0770 

Facsimile: (925) 945-8792 

-andERIC L. ZAGAR 

MICHAEL WAGNER 

TARA P. KAO 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

Telephone: (610) 667-7706 

Facsimile: (610) 667-7056 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, 

Benjamin D. Singerman hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained.

Case 3:07-cv-00740-SI Document 64 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 3 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-00740-SI Document 70 Filed 03/21/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

770100 v1/PA 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 

CASE NO C07-00740 SI 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

 Upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED: 

1. This case and all claims contained therein are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

2. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees associated with 

the prosecution and defense of this matter; and, 

3. Upon entry of the Court’s separate order concerning compliance of all parties and 

their counsel with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b), as required by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(c)(1) and Civil L. R. 

58-1, the Clerk of Court may enter final judgment in this action. 

DATED: 

 THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:07-cv-00740-SI Document 64 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 4 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-00740-SI Document 70 Filed 03/21/08 Page 4 of 4