Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02471/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02471-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RENNE SLOAN 

HOLTZMAN SAKAI LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

-1-

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION - Case No. 2:14-CV-02471-MCE

TIMOTHY G. YEUNG (SBN 186170) 

tyeung@rshslaw.com 

STEVE CIKES (SBN 235413) 

scikes@rshslaw.com 

RENNE SLOAN HOLTZMAN SAKAI LLP 

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 600 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 258-8800 

Facsimile: (916) 258-8801 

Attorney for Defendants 

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, 

COUNTY OF SHASTA (erroneously sued herein as 

SHASTA COUNTY MARSHAL’S OFFICE), and 

JOEL DEAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAIME SCHMIDT, DEBRA KNOWLES, 

ELIZABETH SAMPSON, AND RYAN 

HENRIOULLE, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SHASTA COUNTY MARSHAL’S OFFICE AND 

JOEL DEAN 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:14-CV-02471-MCE 

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE 

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

INDIVIDUAL MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AS TO EACH PLAINTIFF OR, 

IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO EXCEED 

PAGE LIMITS 

On June 14, 2016, Defendants Superior Court of California, County of Shasta and Joel Dean 

(collectively, “Defendants”) filed an ex parte application seeking leave to file individual motions for 

summary judgment as to each of the four Plaintiffs in this case or, in the alternative, to file memoranda in 

support of a single motion for summary judgment in excess of the page limits set forth in the Court’s 

Pretrial Scheduling Order. 

Having considered Defendants’ application (which is unopposed), and good cause appearing 

therefor, the Court hereby rules as follows: 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:14-cv-02471-MCE-DMC Document 23 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RENNE SLOAN 

HOLTZMAN SAKAI LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

-2-

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION - Case No. 2:14-CV-02471-MCE

Defendants’ ex parte application is GRANTED in part. 

The parties may file memoranda in support of (and in opposition to) a single motion for summary 

judgment in excess of the page limits set forth in the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order. In particular, 

Defendants may file an opening memorandum not to exceed 50 pages and a reply memorandum, not to 

exceed 20 pages. Plaintiffs may file an opposition memorandum not to exceed 50 pages. 

IT IS SO ORDERED, 

DATED: June 29, 2016 

Case 2:14-cv-02471-MCE-DMC Document 23 Filed 06/30/16 Page 2 of 2