Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-02634/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-02634-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

[Proposed] ORDER 

Civ. No. 08-02634 PJH

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, #084965 

JONATHAN T. PECK, #12303 (VA) 

MARCIA L. MITCHELL #18122 (WA) 

LINDA S. ORDONIO-DIXON, #172830 

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 

San Francisco District Office 

350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1260 

Telephone No. (415) 625-5651 

Fax No. (415) 625-5657 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DAVID M. LESTER, #119966 

ADAM L. JOHNSON, #167067 

MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP 

650 Town Center Drive, Suite 1200 

Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1925 

Telephone No. (714) 668-2436 

Fax No. (714) 668-2490 

Attorneys for John Muir Health 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JOHN MUIR HEALTH, 

 Defendant. 

 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-02634 PJH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DISCOVERY FOR LIMITED PURPOSE

 This matter comes before the Court based on the June 25, 2010, Order of Magistrate Judge 

Beeler. Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Defendant John Muir Health 

requested a short extension of the discovery deadline in this case in order to address a discovery 

dispute. The parties’ request is hereby granted, as set forth below: 

Case 4:08-cv-02634-PJH Document 42 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[Proposed] ORDER 

Civ. No. 08-02634 PJH

2.

(1) Defendant served the interrogatory responses which are the subject of the instant 

discovery dispute on June 25, 2010; 

(2) Plaintiff will conduct a follow-up deposition regarding these responses on July 21, 2010; 

(3) Plaintiff will serve any further reasonable follow-up discovery concerning the deposition 

topics within one week after the deposition; and, 

(4) Defendant will serve its responses to such discovery within two weeks after service of the 

follow-up discovery. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________________ 

7/26/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:08-cv-02634-PJH Document 42 Filed 07/26/10 Page 2 of 2