Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_12-cv-00556/USCOURTS-almd-2_12-cv-00556-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

LEONARD HOLIDAY, #221 251, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-556-TMH

) [WO]

WARDEN HETZEL, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

It is

ORDERED that Petitioner is GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Petitioner, Leonard Holiday, filed the above captioned application for habeas corpus

relief on June 28, 2012. The court has carefully reviewed the petition. From that review the

undersigned finds that it represents a copy of a habeas corpus application recently filed by

Petitioner which is currently pending before the court. See Holiday v. Hetzel, Civil Action

No. 2:12-CV-529-TMH. The court, therefore, deems it appropriate to dismiss the captioned

action as it simply represents a duplication of Petitioner’s prior case filing.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that the instant

petition for habeas corpus relief be dismissed.

It is further

ORDERED that any party may file objections to the Recommendation on or before

Case 2:12-cv-00556-TMH-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 2
July 17, 2012. Any objections filed must specifically identify the findings in the Magistrate

Judge's Recommendation to which a party objects. Frivolous, conclusive or general

objections will not be considered by the District Court.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the

Magistrate Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District

Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual

findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain

error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5 Cir. 1982). See Stein

th

v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11 Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of

th

Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11 Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the

th

decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on

September 30, 1981.

Done this 2 day of July 2012.

nd

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:12-cv-00556-TMH-TFM Document 2 Filed 07/02/12 Page 2 of 2