Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-07-01040/USCOURTS-ca8-07-01040-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

 No. 06-3870

___________

Larry Coffman; *

*

Appellant, *

*

Theodore Ginnery, *

*

Plaintiff, * Appeals from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri

*

Linda Meade; Jay Englehart; Alan * [UNPUBLISHED]

Blake; John Rosenboom, Dr., *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 No. 07-1040

___________

Larry Coffman; Theodore Ginnery, *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. *

*

Linda Meade; Jay Englehart; Alan *

Blake; John Rosenboom, Dr., *

*

Appellees. *

Appellate Case: 07-1040 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2008 Entry ID: 3411026
1

We find that Theodore Ginnery is not a party to the instant appeals. See

Scarrella v. Midwest Fed. Sav. & Loan, 536 F.2d 1207, 1209 (8th Cir. 1976) (per

curiam).

2

The Honorable Thomas C. Mummert, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

-2-

 ___________

Submitted: March 5, 2008

Filed: March 10, 2008

___________

Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated matters, Larry Coffman1

 appeals following the district

court’s2

 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. Having

conducted de novo review of the record, see Senty-Haugen v. Goodno, 462 F.3d 876,

880, 885, 890-91 (8th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 2048 (2007), we agree with

the district court that there were no disputed issues of material fact and defendants

were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 07-1040 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/10/2008 Entry ID: 3411026