Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00884/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00884-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTIONS TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. CV-00884-JF 

 SF #1536774v3 

Robert E. Krebs, State Bar No. 57526 

Christoper L. Ogden, State Bar No. 235517 

Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP 

225 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 1200 

San Jose, CA 95113-1723 

Tel. 408.292.5800 

Fax 408.287.8040 

 

Ronald F. Lopez, State Bar No. 11756 

Sushila Chanana, State Bar No. 254100 

Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3606 

Tel. 415.371.1200 

Fax. 415.371.1211 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, 

MCM Portfolio LLC, and ALLIACENSE 

LIMITED 

William Sloan Coats, III, State Bar No. 94864 

Mark R. Weinstein, State Bar No. 193043 

Kyle D. Chen, State Bar No. 239501 

White & Case LLP 

3000 El Camino Real 

5 Palo Alto Square, 9th Fl 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

Tel.: 650-213-0300 

Fax: 650-213-8158 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS ASUSTeK 

COMPUTER INC., and ASUS COMPUTER 

INTERNATIONAL 

Charles T. Hoge, State Bar No. 110696 

Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge 

350 Tenth Avenue, Suite 1300 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Tel.: (619) 231-8666 

Fax: (619) 231-9593 

 

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 

PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., et al. 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, 

et al. 

 Defendant. 

Case No. CV-08-884-JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS, TRANSFER OR 

STAY AND CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

**E-filed 8/12/08** ---------------

Case 5:08-cv-00884-JF Document 54 Filed 08/12/08 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTIONS TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. CV-00884-JF 

 SF #1536774v3 

2 

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2008, plaintiffs ASUSTeK Computer Inc. 

(“ASUSTeK”) and ASUS Computer International (“ASUS”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a 

complaint (and a First Amended Complaint on February 13, 2008 (Docket No. 3)) against 

Defendants Technology Properties Limited (“TPL”), Patriot Scientific Corporation (“Patriot”), 

and Alliacense Limited (as well as MCM Portofolio LLC by the First Amended Complaint) 

(collectively, “Defendants”) for declaratory judgment of patent non-infringement and invalidity of 

U.S. Patent Nos. 5,809,336 (“the ‘ 336 patent”); 5,784,584 (“the ‘ 584 patent”); 5,440,749 (“the 

‘ 749 patent”); 6,438,638 (“the ‘ 638 patent”) and 6,976,623 (“the ‘ 623 patent”); 

WHEREAS, on April 25, 2008, one or more Defendants filed complaints for patent 

infringement against Plaintiffs for alleged infringement as to the ‘ 336 patent, the ‘ 749 patent, the 

‘ 638 patent, and the ‘ 623 patent in the Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 2-08-cv-177 (TJW); as 

to the ‘ 584 patent in Case No. 2-08cv-174 (TJW); and as to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,295,443 and 

7,162,549 in Case No.2-08-cv-175 (TJW); 

WHEREAS, on June 4, 2008 Defendants filed a complaint for patent infringement 

against Plaintiffs for alleged infringement as to U.S. Patent No. 5,530,890 (“the ‘ 890 patent”) in 

the Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 2:08-cv-227 (DF) (all Texas cases collectively, “the Texas 

Actions”); 

WHEREAS, the Court entered a Related Case Order determining that the present 

case and the following two cases pending in this district are related to one another: (1) Acer, Inc. 

et al v. Technology Properties Limited et al (C 08-00877 JF); and (2) HTC Corporation et al v. 

Technology Properties Limited et al (C 08-00882 JL) (Docket No. 30) (“Related Matters”); 

WHEREAS, Defendants in the present action and each of the Related Matters filed 

motions on April 25, 2008 to dismiss or in the alternative to transfer to the Eastern District of 

Texas, with all such motions currently set for hearing on August 29, 2008 (“Motions”); 

WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) for the present action 

and the Related Matters is currently scheduled for August 29, 2008; 

Case 5:08-cv-00884-JF Document 54 Filed 08/12/08 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTIONS TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. CV-00884-JF 

 SF #1536774v3 

3 

WHEREAS, Defendants have requested a continuance of the Motions and CMC 

due to a conflict in scheduling; and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to a continuance of the hearing date for the 

Motions and the CMC in the present action and the Related Matters, while the Defendants have 

agreed to an extension of time for Plaintiffs to respond to the Texas Actions until October 3, 2008; 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, AND 

RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE COURT ORDER, AS FOLLOWS: 

 The Case Management Conference and the hearings on the Motions in the present 

action and the Related Matters currently set for August 29, 2008 shall be continued to September 

19, 2008. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: August 6, 2008 THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER LLP 

By: /s/ Robert E. Krebs 

 Robert E. Krebs 

Attorneys for Defendants TECHNOLOGY 

PROPERTIES LIMITED, MCM Portfolio 

LLC and ALLIACENSE LIMITED 

Dated: August 6, 2008 KIRBY NOONAN LANCE & HOGE 

By: /s/ Charles T. Hoge 

 Charles T. Hoge 

Attorney for Defendant PATRIOT 

SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 

Dated: August 6, 2008 WHITE & CASE LLP 

By: /s/ Kyle D. Chen 

 Kyle D. Chen 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs ASUSTeK 

COMPUTER INC., and ASUS COMPUTER 

INTERNATIONAL 

Case 5:08-cv-00884-JF Document 54 Filed 08/12/08 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTIONS TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. CV-00884-JF 

 SF #1536774v3 

4 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: _____________________ 

___________________________________ 

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

United States District Judge 

8/12/08

Case 5:08-cv-00884-JF Document 54 Filed 08/12/08 Page 4 of 4