Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-14-03125/USCOURTS-ca8-14-03125-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3125

___________________________

Louis Jonathan Cutwright

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Sean Crawford; Sheryl Dahm; Tracy Dietsch; Cindy Wolmutt; William Sperfslage

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

 Submitted: March 16, 2015

Filed: March 17, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Louis Cutwright appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se 42 U.S.C. 1

§ 1983 complaint preservice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and denied his post-judgment

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Southern District of Iowa.

Appellate Case: 14-3125 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/17/2015 Entry ID: 4254963 
motion for reconsideration. Upon careful review, we find no basis for reversal. See

Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo review

of § 1915A dismissal); see also Ackerland v. United States, 633 F.3d 698, 701 (8th

Cir. 2011) (appellate court typically construesself-styled motion for reconsideration

as Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment, or as Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)

motion for relief from judgment); Miller v. Baker Implement Co., 439 F.3d 407, 414

(8th Cir. 2006) (appellate court reviews denial of motions under Rule 59(e) or 60(b)

for abuse of discretion). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-

Appellate Case: 14-3125 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/17/2015 Entry ID: 4254963