Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01968/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01968-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

STIPULATION

- 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Amy R. Lovegren-Tipton (SBN 258697)

LAW OFFICE OF AMY R.

LOVEGREN-TIPTON, APLC

5703 N. West Avenue, Suite 103

Fresno, California 93711

Telephone: (559) 421-9137

Facsimile: (559) 921-4333

Email: ATipton@TiptonLegal.com

Attorneys for Defendants TOM HIENG, GORDON K. TESSMAN, JEAN A. TESSMAN, 

DOUGLAS ARNOLD JORISSEN, KIMBER LEA JORISSEN, STACEY LANE WALTER, 

RITHY SOK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD MOORE,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOM HIENG dba SUNSHINE DONUTS; 

GORDON K. TESSMAN, Co-Trustee of the 

GORDON K. TESSMAN and JEAN A. 

TESSMAN REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST 

u/d/t November 18, 2010; JEAN A. 

TESSMAN, Co-Trustee of the GORDON K. 

TESSMAN and JEAN A. TESSMAN 

REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST u/d/t 

November 18, 2010; DOUGLAS ARNOLD 

JORISSEN, Co-Trustee of the DOUGLAS 

ARNOLD JORISSEN AND KIMBER LEA 

JORRISON REVOCABLE TRUST 

AGREEMENT u/d/t August 12, 2010; 

KIMBER LEA JORISSEN, Co-Trustee of the 

DOUGLAS ARNOLD JORISSEN AND 

KIMBER LEA JORRISEN REVOCABLE 

TRUST AGREEMENT u/d/t August 12, 2010; 

STACEY LANE WALTER TRUST u/d/t 

November 23, 2010; RITHY SOK dba 

SUNSHINE DONUTS,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-CV-01968

SECOND STIPULATION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TOM HIENG, GORDON 

K. TESSMAN, JEAN A. TESSMAN, 

DOUGLAS ARNOLD JORISSEN, 

KIMBER LEA JORISSEN, STACEY 

LANE WALTER AND RITHY SOK TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, AND TO 

CONTINUE MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Case 1:14-cv-01968-MJS Document 24 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION

- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, RONALD MOORE (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants TOM HIENG, 

GORDON K. TESSMAN, JEAN A. TESSMAN, DOUGLAS ARNOLD JORISSEN, KIMBER 

LEA JORISSEN, STACEY LANE WALTER and RITHY SOK (“Defendants”) acknowledge 

that the parties previously stipulated to an extension of time wherein Defendants’ response to 

the First Amended Complaint is currently due on or before March 4, 2015;

WHEREAS, the above-referenced parties are engaged in meaningful settlement 

negotiations, and wish to avoid incurring additional fees and unnecessarily utilizing judicial 

resources while Defendants obtain and share with Plaintiff their CASp report(s), and while 

Plaintiff and Defendants explore, and hopefully finalize, a settlement as between them;

WHEREAS, the Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently set for April 2, 2015, 

and the Mandatory Joint Scheduling Conference Statement must therefore be filed on or before 

March 26, 2015;

WHEREAS, the parties do not object to continuing the Mandatory Scheduling 

Conference;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby 

stipulate as follows:

1. To an extension of time (i.e., a second extension which, in total, exceeds 28 days) 

for Defendants to respond to the First Amended Complaint herein, through and including 

March 30, 2015, which extension exceeds the maximum 28 days permissible without leave of 

Court; and

2. That the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for April 2, 2015, be 

continued to a date after May 1, 2015, at the Court’s convenience. 

Dated: March 4, 2015 LAW OFFICE OF AMY R. 

LOVEGREN-TIPTON, APLC

 By/s/Amy R. Lovegren-Tipton

AMY R. LOVEGREN-TIPTON

Attorney for Defendants

Case 1:14-cv-01968-MJS Document 24 Filed 03/06/15 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION

- 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: March 4, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

 By/s/ Tanya E. Moore_________

TANYA E. MOORE

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ response to the First Amended Complaint 

is now due on or before March 30, 2015.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set 

for April 2, 2015 is continued to May 7, 2015 at 10:30 AM , in Courtroom 6, before United 

States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. The Joint Scheduling Conference Statement is to be 

filed no more than seven (7) days prior to the date of the conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 6, 2015 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01968-MJS Document 24 Filed 03/06/15 Page 3 of 3