Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00421/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00421-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 196
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERA FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-07-0421 FCD GGH PS

vs.

PHIL HUIE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

__________________________________/

On August 14, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:07-cv-00421-FCD-GGH Document 15 Filed 10/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 14, 2007, are ADOPTED;

and

2. Defendants’ answer is stricken.

DATED: October 18, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-00421-FCD-GGH Document 15 Filed 10/19/07 Page 2 of 2