Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03534/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03534-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances underlying

the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

NEIL G. GOLDBERG,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES CAMERON, ET AL

Defendants. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C-05-3534 PVT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

The Complaint in this case was filed on August 25, 2005. A Case Management

Conference was scheduled for February 7, 2006.1 On February 6, 2006, Plaintiff requested a

continuance, stating only that the “case remains under evaluation.” The Court granted this last

minute request and continued the Case Management Conference to May 23, 2006. The Case

Management Conference was later continued to June 29, 2006. On June 28, 2006, Plaintiff again

requested a continuance, again stating that the “case remains under evaluation.” The Court

contacted Plaintiff’s counsel and left a message indicating that the request to continue had been

denied. Because the request was not granted, the Case Management Conference remained on

schedule for 11:00 a.m. on June 29, 2006. Plaintiff neither filed a Case Management

Case 5:05-cv-03534-RMW Document 10 Filed 06/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

Conference Statement nor appeared for the Case Management Conference. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than August 31, 2006, Plaintiff shall file a

declaration showing cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, based

on Plaintiff's failure to file a Case Management Conference statement, failure to appear at the

Case Management Conference, and apparent failure to effect timely service of process. 

Dated: June 29, 2006

____________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:05-cv-03534-RMW Document 10 Filed 06/29/06 Page 2 of 2