Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02138/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02138-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 06 CV 2138 CW 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY MARKMAN 

BRIEF AND MOTION FOR SJ AND EXCEPTIONAL CASE 

FINDING 

DM_US:20276843_1 

HOWREY LLP

Edward G. Poplawski (SBN 113590) 

epoplawski@sidley.com

Denise L. McKenzie (SBN 193313) 

dmckenzie@sidley.com

Olivia M. Kim (SBN 228382) 

okim@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 

Los Angeles, California 90013-1010 

Telephone: (213) 896-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 

ATMEL CORPORATION; ATMEL SWITZERLAND; 

ATMEL FRANCE; and ATMEL SARL 

Henry C. Bunsow (SBN 60707) 

bunsowh@howrey.com Denise De Mory (SBN 168076) 

demoryd@howrey.com Brian A.E. Smith (SBN 188147) 

smithbrian@howrey.com HOWREY LLP 

525 Market Street, Suite 3600 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 848-4900 

Facsimile: (415) 848-4999 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AUTHENTEC, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

ATMEL CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation; ATMEL SWITZERLAND, a 

corporation; ATMEL FRANCE, a corporation; 

and ATMEL SARL, a corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AUTHENTEC, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

 Case No. 06 CV 2138 CW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT 

AUTHENTEC’S REPLY MARKMAN 

BRIEF AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT 

AND FOR AN EXCEPTIONAL CASE 

FINDING

Case 4:06-cv-02138-CW Document 481 Filed 04/07/08 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 06 CV 2138 CW 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY MARKMAN 

BRIEF AND MOTION FOR SJ AND EXCEPTIONAL CASE 

FINDING

1 

DM_US21135475_1 

Due to unforeseeable circumstances, including most significantly illness of counsel, the need 

for a brief extension of time to file AuthenTec’s Reply Markman Brief and Motion For Summary 

Judgment of Noninfringement and For An Exceptional Case Finding (“AuthenTec’s Reply”) has 

arisen. AuthenTec has requested that Atmel agree to a brief extension of time. Atmel does not oppose 

AuthenTec’s request for a brief extension of time to file AuthenTec’s Reply. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Atmel Corporation, Atmel 

Switzerland, Atmel France, and Atmel SARL (collectively “Atmel”) and Defendant AuthenTec, Inc. 

(“AuthenTec”) that AuthenTec shall have until Monday, April 7, 2008 to file its Reply. 

DATED: April 4, 2008 

HOWREY LLP 

/s/Denise M. De Mory 

Denise M. De Mory 

HOWREY LLP 

525 Market Street, Suite 3600 

San Francisco CA 94105 

Tel: 415-848-4900 

Fax: 415-848-4999 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DATED: April 4, 2008 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

/s/Olivia M. Kim 

Olivia M. Kim 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

55 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 

Los Angeles, CA 90013-1010 

Telephone No.: (213) 896-6000 

Facsimile No.: (213) 896-6600 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

United States District Judge 

4/7/08

Case 4:06-cv-02138-CW Document 481 Filed 04/07/08 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 06 CV 2138 CW 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY MARKMAN 

BRIEF AND MOTION FOR SJ AND EXCEPTIONAL CASE 

FINDING

-2- 

DM_US21135475_1 

CERTIFICATION BY DENISE M. DE MORY PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE NO. 45, 

SECTION X. RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California, and am a partner in 

the law firm of Howrey LLP, counsel for defendant AuthenTec, Inc.. The statements herein are made 

on my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness I could and would testify thereto. 

2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that concurrence 

has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared document with the 

Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for 

subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party until one 

year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct on April 4, 2008. 

/s/Denise M. De Mory 

Denise M. De Mory 

Case 4:06-cv-02138-CW Document 481 Filed 04/07/08 Page 3 of 3