Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03521/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03521-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jill T. Holder, )

)

Plaintiff, ) No. CIV 05-3521-PHX-RCB

)

vs. ) SCHEDULING ORDER

)

Jo Anne Barnhart, )

Commissioner of Social )

Security Administration, )

)

Defendant. )

) )

This action was commenced on November 2, 2005. On April 27,

2006, this court entered a Scheduling Order as LRCiv 16.2(b)(1)(B)

requires. Since the entry of that Order, however, the plaintiff

moved to amend her complaint. Doc. 11. On August 24, 2006, the

court granted that motion to amend, but it limited the "period in

dispute . . . to September 25, 2001 through July 30, 2004[.]" Doc.

18. Shortly thereafter, on August 30, 2006, plaintiff filed her

First Amended Complaint, doc. 19; and on September 11, 2006, the

defendant filed her answer thereto. Doc. 20. 

Case 2:05-cv-03521-RCB Document 21 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

In light of the foregoing, the court hereby VACATES its prior

Scheduling Order (Doc. 8), and pursuant to the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, Rule 16(b), ORDERS the parties to comply with the

following deadlines for the management of this action:

1. Plaintiff shall file any desired motions, including a

motion for summary judgment, within sixty (60) days from the date

of this order.

2. Defendant shall file her response thereto, and any desired

motions, in accordance with LRCiv 7.2.

3. Plaintiff's reply, if any, likewise shall be filed in

accordance with LRCiv 7.2.

4. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, the matter shall be

deemed submitted when all motions, responses, and replies have been

timely filed.

5. Absent any pending dispositive motions, the court may

dismiss this case for want of prosecution as LRCiv. 41.1 allows.

DATED this 18th day of September, 2006.

Copies to counsel of record

Case 2:05-cv-03521-RCB Document 21 Filed 09/18/06 Page 2 of 2