Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03626/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03626-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

-1- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Allan J. Cory SBN: 224289 

Email: cory@sonic.net 

LAW OFFICE OF ALLAN J. CORY 

740 4th Street, 

Santa Rosa, CA 95404 

Office: 707-527-8810 

Fax: 707-569-1547 

Attorney for Plaintiff, 

Jose Vera 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSE VERA 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC; 

CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE 

CORPORATION; 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY 

AMERICAS, IN TRUST FOR, RESIDENTIAL

ACCREDIT LOANS, INC. MORTGAGE 

ASSET-BACKED PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-QO4; 

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; 

HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC; 

HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL NETWORK, 

INC., a business organization, form unknown; 

TRIMERICA MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 

a business organization, form unknown. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: CV 09-03626-CW 

Hon. Claudia Wilken 

 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

RE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ORIGINALLY 

SET FOR HEARING ON FEBRUARY 18, 

2010) 

 

)

Case 4:09-cv-03626-CW Document 90 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 4
-2- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Plaintiff Jose Vera (“Plaintiff”), by and through counsel of record, and Defendants 

Homecomings Financial, LLC (“Homecomings”), GMAC Mortgage Corporation (“GMAC”), , 

by and through their respective counsel of record stipulate as follows: 

 WHEREAS all parties have in principal agreed on a proposed settlement in the above 

action and are making a good faith effort to dedicate the resolution to a final writing;

 WHEREAS it is believed by all parties that such settlement may be achieved without 

further involvement by the court; 

 WHEREAS Plaintiff’s agreement to the proposed settlement is contingent upon the 

final preparation and production of documents within the control of a third-party (Aurora Loan 

Services, LLC) and that such documents are believed to be forthcoming; 

 WHEREAS it is believed by all parties that such settlement will result in the dismissal 

of all parties to the action; 

 WHEREAS Homecomings and GMAC have a reply due to Plaintiff’s Opposition 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint by February 18, 2010; 

 WHEREAS all parties believe justice will be furthered and judicial resources conserved 

if Homecomings and GMAC are allowed additional time to reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint—the parties believe that 

additional time will allow them to complete the settlement agreements and will lead to dismissal 

of the case without the need for the court to decide the motion to dismiss; 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, and the parties request that the Court Order that any 

reply by Homecomings and GMAC to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

the Second Amended Complaint be filed no later than March 18, 2010. Alternatively, the parties 

request that the Court continue the hearing date to at least April 1, 2010, making Homecomings 

and GMAC Reply due on March 18, 2010. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Case 4:09-cv-03626-CW Document 90 Filed 02/18/10 Page 2 of 4
-3- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: February 16, 2010 

LAW OFFICE OF ALLAN J. CORY 

By: /S/ Allan Cory 

Allan J. Cory 

Attorney for Plaintiff JOSE VERA 

DATED: February 16, 2010 

PALMER, LOMBARDI & DONOHUE LLP 

By: /S/ Frederick A. Haist 

Frederick A. Haist 

Attorneys for Defendant GMAC MORTGAGE, 

LLC (f/k/a GMAC MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION) and HOMECOMINGS 

FINANCIAL, LLC (f/k/a HOMECOMINGS 

FINANCIAL NETWORK, INC.) 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

//

Case 4:09-cv-03626-CW Document 90 Filed 02/18/10 Page 3 of 4
-4- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, any reply by 

Homecomings and GMAC to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the 

Second Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than March 18, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 2/18/10 

Dated:_______________ ________________________________ 

 Hon. Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Court Judge

Case 4:09-cv-03626-CW Document 90 Filed 02/18/10 Page 4 of 4