Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-01145/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-01145-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VERONICA HERNANDEZ; et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:22-cv-01145-KES-EPG

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 

DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION 

DEADLINES

(ECF No. 64).

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ stipulation to continue the discovery deadlines 

by about two months and the dispositive motion deadline by two weeks. As grounds, the parties state 

that the discovery in this case is extensive (over 1,800 pages), there are still outstanding records to be 

obtained, the parties desire to hold off on taking depositions until all the relevant records have been 

received, and defense counsel is involved in a trial this month. (ECF No. 64). The parties do not ask 

to continue the pretrial conference and trial dates.

Based upon the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 64), IT IS ORDERED that the scheduling order 

is modified as follows: 

1. Non-Expert Discovery is now due by 1/15/2025; 

2. Designation of Expert Witnesses is now due by 2/3/2025; 

3. Rebuttal Designation of Expert Witnesses is now due by 3/10/2025; 

4. Expert Discovery is now due by 4/10/2025; and

5. Dispositive Motions must now be filed by 4/11/25.

Case 1:22-cv-01145-KES-EPG Document 65 Filed 10/04/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 Case No. 1:22-CV-01145-KES-EPG

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DATES 

REGARDING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER

6. All unmodified portions of the scheduling order, e.g., the July 21, 2025 pretrial 

conference and September 16, 2025 trial dates, remain in place. (ECF No. 60).

7. Further, as this is the third modification to the scheduling order, future extension 

requests will be disfavored. (ECF No. 27, 49, 60).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 4, 2024 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-01145-KES-EPG Document 65 Filed 10/04/24 Page 2 of 2