Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01673/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01673-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50871/2023873.1 1 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULE

Case No. 05 C 01673 RMW 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

Andrew P. Bridges (SBN: 122761) 

101 California Street, 39th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 591-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 

Email: abridges@winston.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NAVTEQ CORPORATION 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

John B. Quinn (Bar No. 090378) 

David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758) 

Dominic Surprenant (Bar No. 165861) 

Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649) 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Email: johnquinn@quinnemanuel.com 

 davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com 

 dominicsurprenant@quinnemanuel.com 

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

TELE ATLAS N.V. and TELE ATLAS 

NORTH AMERICA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

TELE ATLAS N.V. and TELE ATLAS 

NORTH AMERICA, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NAVTEQ CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 05 C 01673 RMW 

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULE 

Complaint filed April 22, 2005 

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

Case 5:05-cv-01673-RS Document 40 Filed 01/22/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50871/2023873.1 2 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULE

Case No. 05 C 01673 RMW 

Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to the following 

modification of the schedule entered by this Court on August 17, 2006. 

WHEREAS, the parties requested an extension of the discovery cut-off on August 

14, 2006 and the Court granted the extension on August 17, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties have produced a combined total of approximately 

1,147,653 pages to date and the parties continue to supplement their productions on a rolling 

basis; 

WHEREAS, the parties have completed eleven days of depositions to date; 

WHEREAS, the parties have scheduled an additional seven depositions to take 

place prior to January 31, 2007; 

WHEREAS, the parties intend to take at least an additional fifteen depositions of 

party witnesses; 

WHEREAS, certain witnesses noticed by the parties reside in Europe and Japan 

and are scheduling travel to the United States to be deposed; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that, in order to complete discovery in this case, an 

extension of the Court-ordered schedule is required; 

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that the schedule set forth in this Court’s 

August 17, 2006 Order be modified as follows: 

The current schedule: The Parties’ proposed schedule:

Fact discovery closes January 31, 2007 Fact discovery closes May 1, 2007 

Expert discovery closes March 30, 2007 Expert discovery closes July 2, 2007 

Dispositive motions due April 16, 2007 Dispositive motions due July 27, 2007 

Pre-trial conference on July 10, 2007 Pre-trial conference on October 25, 2007 

Trial to start the week of July 24, 2007 Trial to start the week of November 5, 2007 

Case 5:05-cv-01673-RS Document 40 Filed 01/22/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50871/2023873.1 3 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULE

Case No. 05 C 01673 RMW 

SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: December 27, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

By: /s/ David Eiseman 

DAVID EISEMAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 TELE ATLAS N.V. AND TELE ATLAS NORTH 

AMERICA 

Dated: December 27, 2006 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

By: /s/ David Koropp 

DAVID KOROPP 

Attorneys for Defendant 

 NAVTEQ CORPORATION 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 5:05-cv-01673-RS Document 40 Filed 01/22/07 Page 3 of 3