Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-06050/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-06050-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

X ONE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-06050-LHK (SVK)

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 180

Before the Court is Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.’s (“Uber”) Administrative Motion 

to File Under Seal (“Motion”). ECF 180. Uber seeks to seal certain confidential information that 

it submitted to the Court in connection with the Parties’ June 7, 2019 joint discovery letter dispute 

regarding Uber’s motion to compel Plaintiff X One, Inc. (“X One”) to provide further responses to 

Uber’s Requests for Admission Nos. 65–68. ECF 182. Uber seeks to seal the entirety of 

Exhibit C to the joint statement (ECF 180-2) on the grounds that X One has designated it “Highly 

Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the Protective Order in this case. ECF 180 at 1. 

X One failed to file a declaration demonstrating that the material is sealable, as required under 

Civil Local Rule 79-5(e), either by the original deadline or the extended deadline set in the Clerk’s 

Notice issued July 12, 2019. ECF 235. There is therefore no basis upon which to seal Exhibit C

to the Parties’ June 7, 2019 joint discovery letter. 

////

////

////

////

////

Case 5:16-cv-06050-LHK Document 244 Filed 08/02/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Accordingly, the Court DENIES Uber’s administrative motion to seal. Uber shall file the 

unredacted version of Exhibit C in the public record in accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-

5(e)(2).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 2, 2019

SUSAN VAN KEULEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:16-cv-06050-LHK Document 244 Filed 08/02/19 Page 2 of 2