Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05962/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05962-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NETLIST, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

DIABLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No.: 13-cv-5962 YGR 

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO SEAL 

DKT. NOS. 241, 259, 261, 263, 270, 279, 303,

316, 342, 344, 438, 450

The parties herein and non-parties SanDisk Corporation and SMART Storage Systems, Inc. 

(collectively “SanDisk”) filed motions to seal in connection with a number of pretrial motions and 

filings, including Netlist’s Special Motion to Strike, SanDisk’s Motion for Leave to File Motion for 

Reconsideration, filings regarding the amount of a preliminary injunction bond and stay of the 

preliminary injunction, and the parties’ motions in limine. (Dkt. Nos. 241, 259, 261, 263, 270, 279,

303, 316, 342, and 344.) Diablo also filed motions to seal in connection with its post-trial 

submissions. (Dkt. Nos. 438 and 450.) 

The Court finds good cause to seal the identified documents and portions thereof in 

connection with the respective motions in support of which they were submitted. Thus, the motions 

to seal are GRANTED. 

However, those filings are sealed only in connection with the identified motions, and not to 

the extent they were offered and requested to be sealed at trial. This order does not disturb or modify 

any of the Court’s rulings made at trial concerning sealing of these or any other documents or 

testimony. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: April 28, 2015 

____________________________________ 

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:13-cv-05962-YGR Document 463 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 1