Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01999/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01999-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STOCKTON EXECUTIVE LIMOUSINE

CHARTER SERVICES, INC.,

NO. CIV. S-04-1999 LKK/EFB

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

On August 8, 2006, the court entered its tentative pretrial

order. No objections were filed and thus it became final. That

order provided, inter alia:

V. DISPUTED EVIDENTIARY ISSUES

None.

The parties will not be permitted to bring on motions in

limine relative to any evidentiary issues not listed in the final

pretrial order absent a showing that the issue was not reasonably

foreseeable at the time of the pretrial order.

Case 2:04-cv-01999-LKK -EFB Document 117 Filed 05/31/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Both sides had earlier noted the other’s failure to timely 1

exchange exhibits.

2

While the court has no independent recollection of the

particular pretrial conference, consistent with its customary

practice, the court warned the parties that the order would be

enforced and urged the parties to consider appropriate motions

during the period permitting objection.

As noted, the parties did not object. Nonetheless, they now

have both filed motions in limine. Only one, the cross motions re:

failure to timely provide exhibits could possibly fall into the

category of proper motions. Each side will respond to that motion 1

within five (5) days and it will be taken up on the first day of

trial. The other motions will be disregarded.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 31, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-01999-LKK -EFB Document 117 Filed 05/31/07 Page 2 of 2