Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04485/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04485-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order-C-07-4485 CW 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARMANDO PLASCENCIA, and MELANIA

PLASCENCIA, individually and on behalf of

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LENDING 1st MORTGAGE and LENDING

1st MORTGAGE, LLC, and DOES 1 through

10 inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C-07-4485 JW 

Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken 

Ctrm: 2

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Complaint Filed: August 29, 2007

Trial Date: Not set yet.

Case 4:07-cv-04485-CW Document 61 Filed 06/30/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order-C-07-4485 CW 

-2-

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, ARMANDO PLASCENCIA, and MELANIA PLASCENCIA

(hereinafter “Plaintiff”) filed their Second Amended Complaint on January 24, 2008.

WHEREFORE, on March 27, 2008, Plaintiff ARMANDO PLASCENCIA propounded his 

first set of discovery on Defendants LENDING 1st MORTGAGE and LENDING 1st MORTGAGE, LLC

(hereinafter “Defendants”).

WHEREFORE, on May 30, 2008, Defendants responded to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories.

In its responses, Defendants identified EMC Mortgage Corporation as the subsequent purchaser of the

ARM loan sold to Plaintiffs ARMANDO PLASCENCIA, and MELANIA PLASCENCIA.

WHEREFORE, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1641, Plaintiffs seek to file their Third Amended

Complaint adding EMC Mortgage Corporation as an additional defendant.

WHEREFORE, Defendants shall expressly reserve their rights to challenge the sufficiency of the

allegations contained in the Third Amended Complaint to the extent allowed by the Court and Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure.

WHEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed to allow

Plaintiffs leave to file their Third Amended Complaint.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed to allow Defendants LENDING 1st

MORTGAGE and LENDING 1st MORTGAGE, LLC thirty (30) days from service of the Third

Amended Complaint to file a responsive pleading.

Respectfully Submitted,

DATED: June 26, 2008 ARBOGAST & BERNS LLP

By: /s/ David M. Arbogast 

David M. Arbogast

on behalf of Plaintiffs

DATED: June 26, 2008 ERICKSEN, ARBUTHNOT, KILDUFF, 

DAY & LINDSTROM, LLC

By: /s/ J. Thomas Aldrich J. Thomas Aldrich

on behalf of Defendants

Case 4:07-cv-04485-CW Document 61 Filed 06/30/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order-C-07-4485 CW 

-3-

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation of counsel and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file their Third Amended Complaint; and

2. Defendants LENDING 1st MORTGAGE and LENDING 1st MORTGAGE, LLC shall

have thirty (30) days from service of the Third Amended Complaint to file a responsive pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: _________________, 2008 ________________________

Hon. Claudia Wilken

United States District Court Judge

6/30

Case 4:07-cv-04485-CW Document 61 Filed 06/30/08 Page 3 of 3