Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-04950/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-04950-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AARON C. STEVENSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-11-4950 MMC

ORDER RE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2015

HEARING

Before the Court are two motions: (1) plaintiffs’ “Motion for Terminating Sanctions,

or, in the Alternative, Lesser Sanctions, Against Defendants for Their Intentional Spoliation

of Relevant Evidence,” filed August 7, 2015; and (2) defendants’ “Motion for Summary

Judgment, or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment,” filed August 7, 2015. Both

motions are presently scheduled for hearing on September 18, 2015.

Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to both

motions, the Court finds it preferable to first consider plaintiffs’ motion, as the resolution

thereof may bear on the Court’s determination of defendants’ motion.

Accordingly, the Court will hear plaintiffs’ motion, but not defendants’ motion, on the

scheduled date, September 18, 2015. After ruling on plaintiffs’ motion, the Court will

advise the parties whether oral argument and/or supplemental briefing on defendants’

Case 3:11-cv-04950-MMC Document 139 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

motion is necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 16, 2015 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:11-cv-04950-MMC Document 139 Filed 09/16/15 Page 2 of 2