Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_05-cv-00099/USCOURTS-azd-4_05-cv-00099-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Arthur D'Amario, III, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Magdeline Jensen, Chief U.S. Probation

Officer, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-99-TUC-CKJ

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons

stated below, the Motion is denied in part and granted in part.

As a threshold matter, this case was dismissed with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.

The Court only intended to dismiss the case (without prejudice), but inadvertently and

incorrectly added "with prejudice" to the dismissal. Petitioner has made a valid request to

correct this portion of the judgment. As such, pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 60(a) which allows

for the correction of "clerical mistakes . . . arising from oversight or omission"," IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment is corrected such that this case is dismissed without

prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall change the judgment accordingly.

Petitioner also requests that the Court consider the merits of this case as he filed a

motion for summary judgment. However, as previously explained, as the Court does not

have jurisdiction over this case, that motion is moot and it would be improper for the Court

Case 4:05-cv-00099-CKJ Document 23 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

to rule on a motion in a case where the Court lacks jurisdiction. Thus, Petitioner's request

is denied.

DATED this 15th day of December, 2005.

Case 4:05-cv-00099-CKJ Document 23 Filed 12/19/05 Page 2 of 2