Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02707/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02707-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICIA A. MCCOLM, No. 06-cv-02707-MCE-EFB PS

Plaintiff,

vs. ORDER

RESTORATION GROUP, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

On May 18, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. By order filed May 30, 2007, the

magistrate judge granted plaintiff an additional forty-five days in which to file her objections. 

Plaintiff filed objections on July 16, 2007, defendants filed a response to plaintiff’s objections on

July 24, 2007, and they were considered by the undersigned. 

This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to

which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920

(1982). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made,

Case 2:06-cv-02707-MCE -EFB Document 92 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

the court assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed May 18, 2007, are

ADOPTED; 

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted as to all defendants; and 

3. The Clerk is directed to close this case. 

Dated: July 31, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-02707-MCE -EFB Document 92 Filed 08/01/07 Page 2 of 2