Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00995/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00995-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICKY LEE STEWART,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0995 DFL DAD P

vs.

SOLANO STATE PRISON, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed May 31, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to file, within thirty days, a

properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a certified copy of

plaintiff’s prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the

filing of plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not filed a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a

certified copy of plaintiff’s prison trust account statement, and has not otherwise responded to the

court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

Case 2:06-cv-00995-DFL-DAD Document 7 Filed 07/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 11, 2006.

DAD:lg

stew0995.fifp

Case 2:06-cv-00995-DFL-DAD Document 7 Filed 07/11/06 Page 2 of 2