Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00468/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00468-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, 

Plaintiff,

v.

STOLL, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00468-AWI-JLT (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

LEAVE TO AMEND AND TO COUNT AS A 

STRIKE PER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) FOR FAILURE 

TO STATE A CLAIM

(Docs. 18, 19)

ORDER DIRECTING CASE CLOSURE

Plaintiff, Raymond Perez, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 

this in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. In this action, 

Plaintiff claims that an officer stole his quarterly package of goods and that others assisted the 

officer to keep the goods. (Doc. 1.) On August 20, 2015, the Magistrate Judge screened it and 

recommended dismissal without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 18.) The 

Findings and Recommendation was served that same date and allowed for filing of objections 

within thirty days. (Id.) Plaintiff requested and received an extension of time with which he 

complied and filed timely objections. (See Docs. 19, 20, 21.) 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

/ / /

Case 1:15-cv-00468-AWI-JLT Document 22 Filed 10/19/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, issued on August 20, 2015 (Doc. 18), is adopted 

in full; 

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim; 

3. Dismissal of this action counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 16, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00468-AWI-JLT Document 22 Filed 10/19/15 Page 2 of 2