Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-01585/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-01585-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 25:640 Indian Tribal Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Tribal Plaintiff has filed an ex parte request to allow the filing of a Separate Statement of 

Undisputed Facts. Doc. 48. This document was inadvertently omitted from the earlier filing of the 

Motion for Summary Judgment. State Defendants oppose the request on the basis that it does not 

meet the standard for granting an ex parte request for emergency relief. Doc. 50. While the ex 

parte emergency standard is not met, that goes to the form of the motion. This was a minor filing 

mistake and there is no real surprise in this request. Allowing the additional filing would help to 

maintain a complete record for analyzing the motion and for appeal. 

The motion for leave to file a Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts is GRANTED.

State Defendants may file any additional response to the Separate Statement of Undisputed 

Facts within thirty (30) of the filing of this order.

//

//

CACHIL DEHE BAND OF WINTUN 

INDIANS OF THE COLUSA INDIAN 

COMMUNITY a federally recognized 

Indian Colusa,

Plaintiff

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and GAVIN 

NEWSOM IN HIS OFFICIAL 

CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR OF 

CALIFORNIA,

Defendants

CASE NO. 2:20-CV-1585 AWI SKO

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

FILE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF 

UNDISPUTED FACTS

(Doc. 48)

Case 2:20-cv-01585-KES-SKO Document 64 Filed 03/31/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31, 2022 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:20-cv-01585-KES-SKO Document 64 Filed 03/31/22 Page 2 of 2