Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00549/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00549-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, Baker v. Aramark Corp. 

1-SF/7309698.1

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TERRI KEYSER-COOPER 

Pro Hac Vice 

Nev. Bar #3984 

100 N. Arlington Ave. #10F 

Reno, NV 89501 

Tele (775) 337-0323 

DIANE K. VAILLANCOURT 

California Bar #181348 

849 Almar Avenue, Suite C403 

Santa Cruz, CA 95060 

Tele (831) 458-3440 

________ 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael Baker 

et. al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

MICHAEL BAKER, WILLIE ANDREWS, 

RICHARD ELEY and TROY VARGAS, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

ARAMARK CORPORATION, ARAMARK 

UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL, INC., 

ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER 

APPAREL GROUP, INC., JEFF BLACK, 

DON CLOWES, DOUG BATTISTA, WILL 

POLIFKA, GREG LEWIS, TIM BICKERTON 

and DAVE KOCH, 

 Defendants. 

Civ. Case No. S-04-549 DAD 

STIPULATION FOR AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

/ 

Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys Terri Keyser-Cooper and Diane K. Vaillancourt, and 

Defendants, by and through their attorneys Cecily Waterman and Eric Meckley of Morgan, Lewis and 

Bockius, LLP, stipulate and agree that all proceedings in the above-captioned matter be dismissed with 

prejudice pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Confidential Settlement Agreement; 

notwithstanding the foregoing it is understood and agreed that, Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd will 

Case 2:04-cv-00549-DAD Document 162 Filed 11/22/05 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, Baker v. Aramark Corp. 

1-SF/7309698.1

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

retain jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of said Agreement. The parties and their attorneys further 

stipulate that the signature of only one of the attorneys on behalf of each of plaintiffs and defendants is 

required herein. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated November 15, 2005 DIANE K. VAILLANCOURT 

TERRI KEYSER-COOPER 

By: /S/ 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael Baker, Willie 

Andrews, Richard Eley and Troy Vargas 

Dated: November 18, 2005 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

By: /S/ 

Cecily A. Waterman 

Eric Meckley 

Attorneys for Defendant ARAMARK Uniform 

& Career Apparel, Inc., et al. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: November 21, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-00549-DAD Document 162 Filed 11/22/05 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, Baker v. Aramark Corp. 

1-SF/7309698.1

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Ddad1/orders.consent/baker0549.dism 

Case 2:04-cv-00549-DAD Document 162 Filed 11/22/05 Page 3 of 3