Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL MANRIQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HUCHINS, et al.,

Defendants. 

________________________________/

1:09-cv-00456 LJO BAM (PC)

ORDER GRANTING FIRST MOTION 

TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO

OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(ECF No. 213)

ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

LETTER

(ECF No. 214)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983. On June 29, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to file a reply to the opposition

to motion for summary judgment and a letter to the court. The Court shall disregard the letter

filed by plaintiff on June 29, 2012. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD

CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

 1. Plaintiff’s letter, filed June 29, 2012, is DISREGARDED, (ECF No. 214);

2. Plaintiff’ s motion for an extension of time, filed June 29, 2012, is granted, (ECF

No. 213); and

///

///

Case 1:09-cv-00456-BAM Document 219 Filed 07/12/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order in

which to file a reply to the opposition to the motion for summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 11, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

cm411 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00456-BAM Document 219 Filed 07/12/12 Page 2 of 2