Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01034/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01034-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM O. ROBINSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

OFFICER GARCIA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-01034-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL SHALL

COUNT AS A STRIKE UNDER 28

U.S.C. § 1915(G)

Plaintiff William O. Robinson (“plaintiff”), a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this

civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 29, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. On

August 10, 2006, the court granted plaintiff an additional thirty

Case 1:05-cv-01034-OWW -SMS Document 27 Filed 11/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

days within which to file an objection, but to date, plaintiff

has not objected to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 29, 2006,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for failure

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under

section 1983; and

3. This dismissal shall count as a strike under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 10, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01034-OWW -SMS Document 27 Filed 11/13/06 Page 2 of 2