Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_23-cv-01192/USCOURTS-ared-4_23-cv-01192-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

CENTRAL DIVISION 

DWBI INVESTMENTS, LLC PLAINTIFF/ 

COUNTERDEFENDANT 

v. No. 4:23-cv-1192-DPM 

SUTTER & GILLHAM, P.L.L.C. 

v. 

DAVID DENNIS; DENNIS FOOD 

GROUP, LLC; LEPHIEW GIN 

COMP ANY, INC.; TYSON FOODS, 

INC.; LEPHIEW DENNINGTON; 

TYSON SALES AND DISTRIBUTION, 

INC.; TYSON FRESH MEATS, INC.; 

BENJAMIN MCCORKLE; BEACON 

LEGAL GROUP, PLLC; TIMOTHY 

DUDLEY; RICKEY HICKS; and GARY, 

WILLIAMS, PARENTI, WATSON, 

GARY & GILLESPIE, P.L.L.C. 

ORDER 

DEFENDANT/ 

COUNTERCLAIMANT/ 

CROSS-CLAIMANT 

DEFENDANTS/ 

CROSS-DEFENDANTS 

The Court has reviewed the settlement agreement and Tyson's 

proposed redacted version of Doc. 9. The agreement's confidentiality 

provision is not enough to justify sealing any documents that include 

its terms. If the agreement or other documents containing its terms are 

Case 4:23-cv-01192-DPM Document 78 Filed 04/05/24 Page 1 of 2
filed as this case progresses, the bank account information can be 

redacted. And because the Court has determined that the agreement is 

not confidential, redaction of Doc. 9 is unnecessary. The Court directs 

the Clerk to unlock Doc. 9 and restore it to the public docket. 

So Ordered. 

-2-

I 

D .P. Marshall Jr. 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:23-cv-01192-DPM Document 78 Filed 04/05/24 Page 2 of 2