Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00156/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00156-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY LAMON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0156 GEB KJM P

vs.

DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

AND REHABILITATION, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On November 2, 2009, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order filed October 20, 2009, striking plaintiff’s motion for a court order

relating to a transfer (docket no. 151) and denying plaintiff’s motion for the return of original

exhibits (docket no. 155). In this request, plaintiff also takes issue with the Magistrate Judge’s

determination not to revisit a prior ruling on a motion to compel (docket no. 134), based on

plaintiff’s amended “traverse” and her advisement to plaintiff that he faced sanctions should he

continue to file documents and motions outside the motions schedule or unconnected to the

litigation. 

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00156-KJM-CKD Document 174 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Pursuant to Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does

not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed October 20, 2009 (docket no. 161) , is affirmed. 

Dated: January 21, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00156-KJM-CKD Document 174 Filed 01/21/10 Page 2 of 2