Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01058/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01058-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Christopher I. Simmons is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

This action is proceeding against Defendants Grissom, Keiley, St. Lucia, Ellstrom and Does 

#1-10 (nurses) for deliberate indifference toward Plaintiff’s “heat risk” condition, in violation of the 

Eighth Amendment, against Defendants Ellstrom, Rients, Sauceda, Akanno and Rufino for deliberate 

indifference arising from the deprivation of Plaintiff’s pain medication, in violation of the Eighth 

Amendment, and against Defendants Rients, Akanno, Sauceda, Rufino and Ellstrom for retaliation, in 

violation of the First Amendment. 

On July 22, 2014, Defendants Akanno, Grissom, St. Lucia, and Rients filed an answer to 

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. (ECF No. 89.) On July 23, 2014, the Court issued a discovery 

and scheduling order. (ECF No. 90.) 

CHRISTOPHER I. SIMMONS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

GRISSOM, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:07-cv-01058-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND 

SCHEDULING DEADLINES TO DEFENDANT 

KEILEY

Case 1:07-cv-01058-DAD-SAB Document 116 Filed 02/17/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On October 16, 2014, Defendant Keiley filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 93.) The motion 

was denied on February 9, 2015. (ECF No. 112.) 

On February 12, 2015, Defendant Keiley filed an answer to Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 

114.) 

In light of Defendant Keiley’s subsequent answer to the complaint, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that all deadlines set forth in the Court’s July 23, 2014 (ECF No. 90), discovery and 

scheduling order, as modified by way of order dated February 12, 2015 (ECF No. 115), apply to 

Defendant Keiley as well as all other Defendants who have appeared in this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01058-DAD-SAB Document 116 Filed 02/17/15 Page 2 of 2