Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05101/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05101-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 9:9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan

---

Farella Braun & Martel LLP

Russ Building, 30th Floor

235 Montgomery Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

(415) 954-4400

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

18436\863909.4

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT — Case No. C-05-5101-RMW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ATMEL CORPORATION,

Petitioner,

vs.

LM ERICSSON TELEFON, AB,

Respondent.

Case No. C-05-05101-RMW

STIPULATION REGARDING ENTRY OF

JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, on November 19, 2003, Petitioner Atmel Corporation (“Atmel”) commenced

arbitration proceedings against Respondent LM Ericsson Telefon, AB (“Ericsson”) before the

international arm of the American Arbitration Association, known as the International Centre for

Dispute Resolution (“ICDR”);

WHEREAS, Ericsson appeared before the ICDR to contest Atmel’s claim for relief

beginning on December 22, 2003;

WHEREAS, the parties agreed in Paragraph 10.4 of the agreement which gave rise to the

dispute that any ensuing controversy would be “finally settled by binding arbitration” and that

Case 5:05-cv-05101-RMW Document 15 Filed 02/08/06 Page 1 of 3
Farella Braun & Martel LLP

Russ Building, 30th Floor

235 Montgomery Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

(415) 954-4400

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 18436\863909.4

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT — Case No. C-05-5101-RMW

“[j]udgment on the award rendered by the arbitrators may be entered in any court having

jurisdiction thereof”;

WHEREAS, the parties conducted a two-week arbitration hearing with live witnesses

before the ICDR at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York (“ICDR”) beginning on May 16,

2005;

WHEREAS, the ICDR resolved the parties’ dispute by issuing the “Final Award Of

Arbitrators” (“the Award”

1

) on November 21, 2005;

WHEREAS, on December 9, 2005, Atmel petitioned this Court to confirm the Award and

enter it as a judgment of this Court;

WHEREAS, Atmel agrees that Ericsson has satisfied fully Ericsson’s monetary payment

obligations under the Award by having wired to Atmel a total of $43,118,750.00 on

December 21, 2005;

WHEREAS, Ericsson agrees to the entry of the Award as a judgment of this Court, and

agrees as to the form of the Proposed Judgment submitted contemporaneously herewith;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to the Court’s approval, that the arbitral Award

should be confirmed and the Proposed Judgment submitted contemporaneously herewith should

be entered as a judgment of this Court. By this stipulation, the parties have only agreed to the

entry of the Award as a Judgment of the Court.

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

1 Atmel su//bmitted the Award under seal as Exhibit B to the Declaration Of Andrew Leibnitz In Support Of Atmel

Corporation’s Petition To Confirm Arbitral Award, dated December 9, 2005.

Case 5:05-cv-05101-RMW Document 15 Filed 02/08/06 Page 2 of 3
Farella Braun & Martel LLP

Russ Building, 30th Floor

235 Montgomery Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

(415) 954-4400

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 - 18436\863909.4

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT — Case No. C-05-5101-RMW

DATED: January 23, 2006 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP

By: /s/

John L. Cooper

Attorneys for Petitioner

ATMEL CORPORATION

DATED: January 23, 2006 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/

Thomas L. Treffert

Attorneys for Respondent

LM ERICSSON TELEFON, AB

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED this ______ day of February, 2006. 

___________________________________

United States District Court Judge

I attest that concurrence in the filing of the above stipulation has been obtained from

counsel for LM ERICSSON TELEFON, AB.

DATED: January 24, 2006 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP

By: /s/

John L. Cooper

Attorneys for Petitioner

ATMEL CORPORATION

Case 5:05-cv-05101-RMW Document 15 Filed 02/08/06 Page 3 of 3