Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00489/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00489-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

LAW OFFICES OF

PORTER, SCOTT,

WEIBERG & DELEHANT

A PROFE S S IONA L C ORPORA T IO N

350 UN IVER S IT Y AVE ., SUIT E 200

P .O . BO X 255428

SACRAMENTO, CA 95865

(916) 929-1481

www.pswdlaw.com

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

00538474.WPD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCLOSURES

PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

A Professional Corporation

Terence J. Cassidy, SBN 099180

John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, CA 95825

(916) 929-1481

(916) 927-3706 (facsimile)

Bruce S. Alpert, SBN 075684

BUTTE COUNTY COUNSEL

25 County Center Drive

Oroville, CA 95965-3380

(530) 538-7621

(530) 538-6891 (facsimile)

ATTORNEYS FOR: Defendants BUTTE COUNTY, BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT and PERRY RENIFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEAN MILLER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BUTTE COUNTY, BUTTE COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, PERRY

RENIFF, SHAROL STRICKLAND,

CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL

GROUP, INC. And DOES ONE through

TWENTY, inclusive,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV 06-0489 RBB KJM

STIPUL A TIO N T O CO N TINUE

EXPERT DISCLOSURES; ORDER

The parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby agree to the

proposed change set forth below and request the Court modify the Scheduling Order filed

September 1, 2006 as follows: 

Old Date New Date

Expert Witnesses Disclosure November 5, 2007 November 26, 2007

///

Case 2:06-cv-00489-JAM -DAD Document 31 Filed 10/29/07 Page 1 of 2
LAW OFFICES OF

PORTER, SCOTT,

WEIBERG & DELEHANT

A PROFE S S IONA L C ORPORA T IO N

350 UN IVER S IT Y AVE ., SUIT E 200

P .O . BO X 255428

SACRAMENTO, CA 95865

(916) 929-1481

www.pswdlaw.com

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

00538474.WPD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCLOSURES

Good cause exists to modify the Scheduling Order. The parties are in the process of

discussing further modifications of Scheduling Order to include continuation of nonpercipient discovery cut off, dispositive motion deadline and trial in order to allow for the

unfortunate delay in obtaining voluminous medical records of Plaintiff regarding Plaintiff’s

extensive medical and mental history. Thus, additional time is both reasonable and necessary

to obtain documents in order to provide them to expert witnesses in sufficient time to prepare

Rule 26 disclosures and exchange of said materials, and conduct further discovery on same.

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: October 29, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH FRUCHT

/s/ Kenneth N. Frucht

By 

Kenneth N. Frucht 

Attorney for Plaintiff JEAN MILLER

DATED: October 29, 2007 TRIMBLE, SHERINIAN & VARANINI 

/s/ Jerome M. Varanini

By 

Jerome M. Varanini

Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA

FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC

DATED: October 29, 2007 PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

A Professional Corporation

/s/ John R. Whitefleet

By 

Terence J. Cassidy

John R. Whitefleet 

Attorneys for Defendants

BUTTE COUNTY, BUTTE COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT and PERRY

RENIFF

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 29, 2007 /s/ Ralph R. Beistline 

U. S. District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00489-JAM -DAD Document 31 Filed 10/29/07 Page 2 of 2