Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00474/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00474-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

Case CV 05-00474 MMC (EMC)

STIPULATION REGARDING FILING

 OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Nicola A. Pisano, State Bar No. 151282

LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP

Del Mar Gateway, 11988 El Camino Real, Suite 200

San Diego, California 92130-2594

Telephone No.: 858.720.6320

Fax No.: 858.523.4326

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant

VALYD, INC.

Theodore T. Herhold, State Bar No. 122895

Matthew R. Hulse, State Bar No. 209490

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

379 Lytton Avenue

Palo Alto, California 94301

Telephone No.: 650.326.2400

Fax No.: 650.326.2422

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

VALYD, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE 

CORPORATION, INC. 

Defendant.

_____________________________________

COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE 

CORPORATION, INC.,

 Counterclaimant,

v.

VALYD, INC.,

 Counterdefendant.

CASE NO. CV 05-00474 MMC (MED)

STIPULATION REGARDING FILING 

OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Valyd, Inc., through its undersigned counsel, and 

Defendant/Counterclaimant Communication Intelligence Corporation, through its undersigned 

counsel, hereby submit this Stipulation regarding filing of a First Amended Complaint. 

AND ORDER THEREON

Case 3:05-cv-00474-MMC Document 24 Filed 07/08/05 Page 1 of 2
2 Case CV 05-00474 MMC (MED)

STIPULATION REGARDING FILING

 OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant’s counsel has objected to the originally-filed Complaint on the grounds that the

allegations regarding unenforceability of the patents in suit are not pleaded with sufficient 

particularity pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 9. Plaintiff’s undersigned counsel has agreed to file a 

First Amended Complaint, submitted herewith, withdrawing the allegations of unenforceability of 

the patents-in-suit without prejudice subject to further repleading that defense if facts uncovered 

during discovery so warrant.

The First Amended Complaint will be deemed served on the day it is filed.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: July 7, 2005 LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP

By: /s/ Nicola A. Pisano

Nicola A. Pisano

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, 

VALYD, INC.

DATED: July 7, 2005 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

By: /s/ Matthew R. Hulse

Matthew R. Hulse

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE

CORPORATION

2085940.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 8, 2005

Case 3:05-cv-00474-MMC Document 24 Filed 07/08/05 Page 2 of 2