Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-05437/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-05437-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT— Case Nos. MDL-1423, 02-05437 

E-filed on 6/13/07

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE CYGNUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS

TECHNOLOGY, LLC, PATENT

LITIGATION

______________________________________

CYGNUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS

TECHNOLOGY, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

GLOBALPHONE CORP., 

Defendant.

No. MDL-1423

This Judgment Applies to:

 C-02-05437 RMW

AMENDED JUDGMENT

On March 30, 2007, pursuant to its Claim Construction Order and Orders on Various

Summary Judgment Motions dated March 29, 2007, the court purported to enter final judgment

declaring that the patents-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 5,883,964 and U.S. Patent No. 6,035,027, are

invalid under the on-sale bar of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and that defendant GlobalPhone Corp. does not

infringe either patent. 

The court's judgment did not address the remaining declaratory judgment counterclaims

brought by defendant GlobalPhone Corp. against plaintiff seeking declarations that the patents are

invalid under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 and 112. The court inadvertently failed to include a direction

Case 5:02-cv-05437-RMW Document 201 Filed 06/13/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT— Case Nos. MDL-1423, 02-05437 

2

for final entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. § 54(b) on the claims resolved. Therefore, the

court hereby directs that final judgment be entered: (1) declaring the '964 and '027 patents invalid

based upon the on-sale bar; and (2) adjudging that plaintiff take nothing on its claim of patent

infringement. The court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay in the entry of

final judgment because the remaining counterclaims have been rendered moot and will only become

ripe for decision if this judgment is reversed.

 

DATED: 6/13/07

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:02-cv-05437-RMW Document 201 Filed 06/13/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT— Case Nos. MDL-1423, 02-05437 

3

A copy of this judgment was mailed on 6/13/07 to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

John P. Sutton

2421 Pierce Street

San Francisco, CA 94115-1131

Counsel for Defendants:

John F. Mardula, Jon L. Roberts 

Roberts Mardula & Wertheim, LLC 

11800 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 1000 

Reston, VA 20191-5302 

Courtesy Copy:

Clerk of the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building

One Columbus Circle, N.E.

Room G-255, North Lobby

Washington, DC 20002-8004

Counsel is responsible for distributing copies of this order to co-counsel, as necessary.

Case 5:02-cv-05437-RMW Document 201 Filed 06/13/07 Page 3 of 3