Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05412/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05412-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E. & J. GALLO WINERY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

ENCANA ENERGY SERVICES, INC., )

a Delaware corporation, formerly known )

as PANCANADIAN ENERGY )

SERVICES INC.; ENCANA )

CORPORATION, a Canadian )

corporation, formerly known as and )

successor to PANCANADIAN )

ENERGY CORPORATION, )

)

Defendants )

____________________________________)

CV F 03-5412 AWI LJO

ORDER VACATING

HEARING DATE OF APRIL

28, 2005, AND TAKING

MATTER UNDER

SUBMISSION

On February 9, 2005, defendants EnCana Energy Services, et al.

(“Defendants”) noticed for hearing and decision a motion to dismiss pursuant to FRCP

12(b)(3), or in the alternative to transfer or dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), or in the

alternative to Strike or for summary judgement or summary adjudication (“Motion to

Dismiss”). The matter was rescheduled for oral argument to be held on April 28, 2005. The

court has preliminarily reviewed the submissions of the parties and has determined, based on

the volume and complexity of the materials submitted and on the congested nature of the

court’s docket at the present time, that the matter must be taken under submission “subject to

the power of the Court to reopen the matter for further briefs or oral arguments or both.” 

Case 1:03-cv-05412-LJO -DLB Document 455 Filed 04/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Local Rule 78-230(h).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of

April 28, 2005, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of April 28, 2005,

the court will take the matter under submission and will thereafter render a decision or

request further briefing or schedule oral argument as appropriate in accordance with Local

Rule 78-230(h).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

h2ehf UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05412-LJO -DLB Document 455 Filed 04/20/05 Page 2 of 2