Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-01123/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-01123-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DONALD GLASS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CDCR, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:20-cv-1123 KJM CKD P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On September 23, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served upon plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 

findings and recommendations. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:20-cv-01123-DJC-CKD Document 32 Filed 10/27/22 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 23, 2021, are adopted in full; 

 2. All claims and defendants other than 1) claims arising under the Eighth Amendment 

against defendants Dania, Musgrave and Temple for either causing plaintiff not to receive or 

denying plaintiff any food for a period of 4 days and 2) claims arising under the First Amendment 

based upon retaliation for protected conduct against defendants Dania, Musgrave and Temple are 

dismissed; 

 3. Plaintiff’s request for judicial notice in his December 20, 2021 objections to the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations is denied; and 

4. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 

proceedings. 

DATED: October 26, 2022. 

Case 2:20-cv-01123-DJC-CKD Document 32 Filed 10/27/22 Page 2 of 2