Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00566/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00566-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND L. SMITH, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S 05-0566 LKK CMK 

vs.

GUST KEPROES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil rights

action. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302(b)(21). 

On November 3, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations; the undersigned has considered the objections

and has determined there is no need to modify the findings and recommendations based on the

points raised in the objections.

Case 2:05-cv-00566-LKK -CMK Document 23 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Due to clerical error, the defendant was listed in the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendations as William Garner, the correct name is William Warner and is corrected

herein.

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 3, 2005, are adopted in

full; 

2. The motion to dismiss filed by defendant Jean Wright d/b/a Cove Mobile Villa

be granted and plaintiff’s claims against defendant Jean Wright d/b/a Cove Mobile Villa sued

herein as Jean Wright and Cove Mobile Villa be dismissed with prejudice;

3. Plaintiff’s claims against Gust Keproes, Bruce Hull, William Warner1, Kenneth

Bottoms, Paul Woodcock and John Does 1-3 be dismissed with prejudice; and

4. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 11, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:05-cv-00566-LKK -CMK Document 23 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2