Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02820/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02820-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE DOE I–V AND JOHN DOE I–IV, on

behalf of themselves and all others similarly

situated

Plaintiffs,

 v.

TEXACO, INC.; TEXACO PETROLEUM

CO. AND CHEVRON CORP.,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-02820 WHA

ORDER RE ORAL ARGUMENT

At the hearing on September 21, 2006, counsel should be prepared to discuss why this

case should not be dismissed on forum non conveniens grounds, per Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc.,

303 F.3d 470 (2002).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 19, 2006 WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-02820-WHA Document 85 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 1