Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01342/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01342-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE T. MCLAUGHLIN, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 2:08-cv-01342-PMP-GWF

)

vs. ) FINDINGS AND 

) RECOMMENDATIONS

M. COVA, )

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________) 

On October 27, 2009, the Court screened Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)-(2) to identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that were

frivolous, malicious, failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or sought monetary

relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. (Dkt. #12). The Court found that

Plaintiff had failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and dismissed the

complaint with leave for Plaintiff to amend his complaint. (Id.) The Court granted Plaintiff until

November 26, 2009 to submit a second amended complaint if he believed he could correct the

noted deficiencies. (Id.)

It is now one hundred and one (101) days since the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend

and Plaintiff has neither filed a second amended complaint nor responded to the Court’s Order. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. #5)

should be dismissed with prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to file a second amended

complaint and failure to respond to the Court’s Order. 

. . .

. . .

. . .

Case 2:08-cv-01342-PMP -GWF Document 13 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE

These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

(20) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED this 8th day of February, 2010.

______________________________________

GEORGE FOLEY, JR.

United States Magistrate Judge

2

Case 2:08-cv-01342-PMP -GWF Document 13 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 2