Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02797/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02797-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE KING,

Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-2797 JAM DAD P

vs.

MIKE MCDONALD, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 3, 2012, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment in

this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Despite two orders directing him to

file an opposition or statement of non-opposition, plaintiff failed to timely oppose the motion. 

For that reason, on July 31, 2012, this court issued findings and recommendations recommending

dismissal of this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). On August 15, 2012, plaintiff filed a

motion seeking a ninety day extension of time to file an opposition to the motion for summary

judgment and a motion for copies. In the latter motion, plaintiff contends that he is without any

of his legal materials and that he mailed his opposition to a motion to dismiss. Court records

reveal that no opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment has yet been filed in this

action.

After review of the record, and good cause appearing, the July 31, 2012 findings

and recommendations will be vacated. In light of the July 6, 2012 decision of the United States

1

Case 2:10-cv-02797-JAM-DAD Document 58 Filed 08/22/12 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), and

good cause appearing, defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be denied without

prejudice to its renewal within forty-five days from the date of this order, and defendants will be

directed to inform the court in writing within twenty days whether plaintiff has access to his legal

property. Finally, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to send plaintiff a copy of the docket

sheet for this action. 

Pursuant to Woods, Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en

banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the court hereby once again

informs plaintiff of the following requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Such a motion is a request for an order for judgment in favor of 1

the defendant without trial. A defendant’s motion for summary judgment will set forth the facts

that the defendant contends are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle the defendant to

judgment. To oppose a motion for summary judgment, plaintiff must show proof of his or her

claims. Plaintiff may do this in one or more of the following ways. Plaintiff may rely on

plaintiff’s statements made under penalty of perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that

plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and plaintiff specifies those parts of the

complaint on which plaintiff relies. Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or

declarations setting forth the facts that plaintiff believes prove plaintiff’s claims; the person who

signs an affidavit or declaration must have personal knowledge of the facts stated. Plaintiff may

rely on written records, but plaintiff must prove that the records are what plaintiff asserts they

are. Plaintiff may rely on all or any part of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to

interrogatories, or admissions obtained in this proceeding. If plaintiff fails to contradict the

defendant’s evidence with counteraffidavits or other admissible evidence, the court may accept

defendant’s evidence as true and grant the motion. If there is some good reason why such facts

 Plaintiff was informed of these requirements in an order filed May 19, 2011. 1

2

Case 2:10-cv-02797-JAM-DAD Document 58 Filed 08/22/12 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

are not available to plaintiff when required to oppose a motion for summary judgment, the court

will consider a request to postpone consideration of the defendant’s motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

56(d). If plaintiff does not serve and file a written opposition to the motion, or a request to

postpone consideration of the motion, the court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of

opposition to the defendant’s motion. See L.R. 230(l). If the court grants the motion for

summary judgment, whether opposed or unopposed, judgment will be entered for the defendant

without a trial and the case will be closed as to that defendant. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 31, 2012 (Docket No. 53) are

vacated;

2. Within twenty days from the date of this order defendants shall inform the

court in writing of the status of plaintiff’s access to his legal property;

3. Defendants’ February 3, 2012 motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 41)

is denied without prejudice to its renewal within forty-five days from the date of this order;

4. Should defendants choose to renew their motion for summary judgment, they

shall serve on plaintiff all documents filed as part of the renewed motion or relied on to support

the motion;

5. Plaintiff’s opposition to any renewed motion shall be filed and served not later

than thirty days after service of the renewed motion; 

6. Defendants’ reply brief, if any, shall be filed and served not later than fourteen

days after service of plaintiff’s opposition;

7. Plaintiff’s August 15, 2012 motion for extension of time (Docket No. 54) is

denied as moot;

8. Plaintiff’s August 15, 2012 motion for copies (Docket No. 55) is denied

without prejudice; and

/////

3

Case 2:10-cv-02797-JAM-DAD Document 58 Filed 08/22/12 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

9. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the public docket

sheet for this action.

DATED: August 22, 2012.

DAD:12

king2797.ntc

4

Case 2:10-cv-02797-JAM-DAD Document 58 Filed 08/22/12 Page 4 of 4