Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01192/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01192-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Jesse Hunter is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of 

the United States Magistrate Judge on November 5, 2014. Local Rule 302.

On November 18, 2014, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim 

under section 1983 and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 

1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff did not comply or 

otherwise responded to the Court’s order. 

Accordingly, on January 6, 2015, the Court issued an order to show cause within thirty days as 

why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court’s 

order to show cause. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which 

relief may be granted. 

JESSE HUNTER,

 Plaintiff,

v.

McBRIDE, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01192-SAB (PC)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH 

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE 

A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY 

BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983

[ECF Nos. 1, 8, 9]

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT 

TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G)

Case 1:14-cv-01192-SAB Document 10 Filed 02/18/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Based on the foregoing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), this action is 

HEREBY DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which 

relief may be granted under section 1983. This dismissal is subject to the “three-strikes” provision set 

forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Silva v. Di Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098-99 (9th Cir. 2011).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01192-SAB Document 10 Filed 02/18/15 Page 2 of 2