Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01294/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01294-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SECOND EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANT CAMINO ROYALE INVESTMENT

CORPORATION CV-10-1294-JSW 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

4328 Redwood Hwy., Suite 300

San Rafael, CA 94903

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARSHALL LOSKOT, an individual

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARSHALL LOSKOT, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAN BRUNO INN, a California Limited

Liability Partnership; and CAMINO

ROYALE INVESTMENT

CORPORATION, a California Corporation,

dba RAMADA LIMITED, 

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CV-10-1294-JSW 

SECOND EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR

ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE

DEFENDANT CAMINO ROYALE

INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a

California Corporation, dba RAMADA

LIMITED

Complaint filed: March 26, 2010

This action was filed on March 26, 2010. Pursuant to General Order 56 and Civil Local

Rule 7-11, plaintiff was to have defendants served on or before May 25, 2010. 

The defendants to this action are SAN BRUNO INN, a California Limited Liability

Partnership; and CAMINO ROYALE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a California

Corporation, dba RAMADA LIMITED. 

Defendant SAN BRUNO INN, a California Limited Liability Partnership has been served

with the summons and complaint and filed its answer to plaintiff’s complaint on June 14, 2010. 

Prior to the filing of the complaint, defense counsel Marty Orlick corresponded with

plaintiff MARSHALL LOSKOT on behalf of defendants in the above-referenced case. 

Case 3:10-cv-01294-JSW Document 10 Filed 07/20/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:10-cv-01294-JSW Document8 Filed07/12/10 Page1 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SECOND EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANT CAMINO ROYALE INVESTMENT

CORPORATION CV-10-1294-JSW 2

On April 22, 2010, counsel for the plaintiff wrote to defense counsel Marty Orlick

requesting that he accept service on behalf of all defendants which included the summons,

complaint and the notice of acknowledgment receipt. Attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is the face

sheet of the letter dated April 22, 2010 and the notice of acknowledge receipt that was sent from

plaintiff’s counsel. 

On or about May 12, 2010, plaintiff’s counsel received the signed notice of

acknowledgment receipt from defense counsel. Attached hereto as “Exhibit “B” is the signed

notice of acknowledgment receipt. 

On May 13, 2010, plaintiff’s counsel filed the notice of acknowledgment receipt. 

However, on June 11, 2010, plaintiff’s counsel office wrote to defense counsel inquiring about

defendants SAN BRUNO INN, a California Limited Liability Partnership; and CAMINO

ROYALE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a California Corporation, dba RAMADA

LIMITED response to plaintiff’s complaint and learned that defense counsel, Marty Orlick only

represents defendant SAN BRUNO INN, a California Limited Liability Partnership and does not

represent defendant CAMINO ROYALE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a California

Corporation, dba RAMADA LIMITED. Attached hereto as Exhibit “C” is the email dated June

11, 2010, sent to defense counsel Marty Orlick. 

Plaintiff’s attorney, Thomas E. Frankovich was under the impression that defense counsel

Marty Orlick would be representing all defendants in the above-referenced case. It was simply a

misunderstanding between the parties. 

Case 3:10-cv-01294-JSW Document 10 Filed 07/20/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:10-cv-01294-JSW Document8 Filed07/12/10 Page2 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SECOND EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANT CAMINO ROYALE INVESTMENT

CORPORATION CV-10-1294-JSW 3

In light of the above, plaintiff MARSHALL LOSKOT respectfully request for an

extension of time to complete service on defendant CAMINO ROYALE INVESTMENT

CORPORATION, a California Corporation, dba RAMADA LIMITED and requests that the last

day for plaintiff to complete service on defendant CAMINO ROYALE INVESTMENT

CORPORATION, a California Corporation, dba RAMADA LIMITED be continued for a period

of 60-days to allow plaintiff time to either succeed at or exhaust his service efforts, and

presuming that service is accomplished, to allow defendant CAMINO ROYALE INVESTMENT

CORPORATION, a California Corporation, dba RAMADA LIMITED time to file a responsive

pleading. 

Plaintiff would also request that the last day for the parties and counsel to conduct a joint

inspection of the premises be continued from July 6, 2010 to September 7, 2010, in order to give

all parties sufficient time to be served, appear, and meaningfully participate in the joint

inspection.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: July 12, 2010 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

 

By: /s/Thomas E. Frankovich 

Thomas E. Frankovich 

Attorneys for Plaintiff MARSHALL LOSKOT, an

individual

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that plaintiff has an additional sixty (60) days from the date of this

Order to serve defendant CAMINO ROYALE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a California

Corporation, dba RAMADA LIMITED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last day for the

parties to conduct the joint inspection of the premises be continued up to and including

September 7, 2010. 

Dated: ________________, 2010 ______________________________________

 Hon. Jeffery S. White

 United States District Judge 

Case3:10-cv-01294-JSW Document8 Filed07/12/10 Page3 of 13

July 20

Case 3:10-cv-01294-JSW Document 10 Filed 07/20/10 Page 3 of 3