Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-01832/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-01832-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 06cv1269

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARNELL J. EDMUNDSON, 

Plaintiff, 

Case No. 05-CV-01832-JM (BLM) 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION 

RE: DENIAL OF DEFENDANT

BARNHART’S MOTION TO

DISMISS 

vs.

JO ANN B. BARNHART, 

Defendant.

On September 22, 2005, Plaintiff sought judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s

final decision denying his claim for disability insurance. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the

claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Procedure arguing this Court lacks subject

matter jurisdiction because Plaintiff’s complaint in federal District Court was time barred. 

On January 5, 2007, Magistrate Judge Major entered a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”)

(1) finding this Court does have subject matter jurisdiction because the time limitation is not

jurisdictional; and (2) recommending denial of Defendant’s motion to dismiss. The subject matter

jurisdiction issue has since become moot and there no longer exists any case or controversy regarding

the subject matter jurisdiction of this Court. 

On January 22, 2007, Defendant filed an objection to the R & R. Defendant also filed an

amended motion to dismiss in response to the resolution of the subject matter jurisdiction questions.

/ / / 

Case 3:05-cv-01832-JM-BLM Document 17 Filed 04/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 06cv1269

For the foregoing reasons, the R & R is adopted in its entirety, the objections are denied as

moot, and the case is again referred to Magistrate Judge Major for review of the issues raised in

Defendant’s amended motion to dismiss. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 25, 2007

 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller

 United States District Judge

cc: All Parties 

Case 3:05-cv-01832-JM-BLM Document 17 Filed 04/25/07 Page 2 of 2