Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01242/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01242-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD D. DAVIS, III,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-11-1242 KJM DAD PS

vs.

FOLSOM CORDOVA UNIFIED ORDER SETTING STATUS

SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this civil rights action on May 9, 2011,

by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. The Clerk has issued a summons as to

eight defendants. The case has been referred to the undersigned for all purposes encompassed by

Local Rule 302(c)(21).

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, September 9,

2011, at 10:00 a.m. at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in

Courtroom No. 27 before the undersigned;

2. Within fourteen (14) days after plaintiff is served with this order, plaintiff shall

serve a copy of this order upon each defendant; within five (5) days after serving a copy of this

/////

Case 2:11-cv-01242-KJM-DAD Document 4 Filed 05/11/11 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

order on a defendant, plaintiff shall file a certificate of service indicating the date and manner of

service of this order on the defendant on the defendant who was served;

3. Any party may appear at the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference

telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom

deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128 at least 48 hours before the Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference;

4. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before August 26, 2011, and

defendants shall file and serve their status report or reports on or before September 2, 2011. 

Each party’s status report shall address all of the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Possible amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof,

including disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including the setting of

appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and for law

and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial

conference and trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures

specified by the rules due to the relative simplicity

or complexity of the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any other case,

including matters in bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate

judge assigned to this matter acting as settlement

judge, waiving any disqualification by virtue of his

so acting, or whether they prefer to have a

Settlement Conference before another magistrate

judge;

/////

Case 2:11-cv-01242-KJM-DAD Document 4 Filed 05/11/11 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

k. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a

United States Magistrate Judge; and

l. Any other matters that may aid in the just and

expeditious disposition of this action;

5. The pro se plaintiff is informed that failure to file a timely status report or

failure to appear at the status conference in person or telephonically may result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and as a sanction for failure

to comply with court orders and applicable rules. See Local Rules 110 and 183; and

6. The pro se plaintiff is cautioned that Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure provides that a defendant must be dismissed if service of the summons and complaint

is not accomplished on that defendant within 120 days from the date the complaint was filed.

DATED: May 10, 2011.

DAD:kw

Ddad1\orders.prose\davis1242.ossc

Case 2:11-cv-01242-KJM-DAD Document 4 Filed 05/11/11 Page 3 of 3