Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02878/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02878-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DERRICK SATCHELL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

FEDEX CORPORATION,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 03-02659 SI

No. C 03-02878 SI

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL

AFTER PRODUCTION OF DISCOVERY

Defendants have filed motions for summary judgment regarding several of the named plaintiffs in this

case; these motions are found at docket # 103 (Valerie Brown), # 105 (Rick Gonzales), # 107 (Kenneth

Bernard Stevenson, Sr.), # 117 (KaliniBoykin), and # 236 (Kelvin Smith). In an order filed March 21, 2005,

the Court granted plaintiffs’ Rule 56(f) motion and reset the briefing schedule on these motions. 

Plaintiffs filed a renewed Rule 56(f) motion [Docket # 315] contending that defendants again failed to

comply with various discovery obligations. In two separate orders filed September 7, 2005, the Court

addressed all outstanding discovery matters, and on September 16, 2005, the Court granted defendant

extensions of time until October 31, 2005 and November 15, 2005 to produce discovery pursuant to the

September 7, 2005 orders. 

In the interest of managing this litigation, the Court hereby DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE

defendant’s pending motions for summary judgment. Defendant may refile these motions after defendant has

produced the discovery that is the subject of the Court’s September 7, 2005 orders. When refiling any such

motion, defendant may incorporate by reference any previously filed motion or declaration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 3:03-cv-02878-SI Document 88 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Dated: September _28___, 2005

 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:03-cv-02878-SI Document 88 Filed 09/28/05 Page 2 of 2