Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_00-cv-01816/USCOURTS-cand-3_00-cv-01816-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] AMENDED STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER (C 00-1816 CRB) 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

DANIEL J. FURNISS (CSB NO. 73531) 

IAN L. SAFFER (admitted pro hac vice) 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400 

Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BUSINESS OBJECTS, S.A. 

LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB NO. 054283) 

 e-mail: lpasahow@fenwick.com 

J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB NO. 176148) 

 e-mail: dhadden@fenwick.com 

DARREN E. DONNELLY (CSB NO. 194335) 

 e-mail: ddonnelly@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Defendants 

COGNOS, INC. and COGNOS CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

BUSINESS OBJECTS, S.A., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COGNOS, INC., a Canadian Corporation, 

and COGNOS CORPORATION, a 

Delaware Corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 00-1816 CRB 

[PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING THE 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

Case 3:00-cv-01816-CRB Document 199 Filed 08/08/06 Page 1 of 5
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] AMENDED STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER (C 00-1816 CRB) 2 

WHEREAS, the parties filed, and the Court entered, a Stipulated Protective Order in the 

above-captioned action on August 21, 2000 (the “Business Objects-Cognos Protective Order”); 

WHEREAS, the Business Objects-Cognos Protective Order limited disclosure or other 

communication of materials designated as “CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 

and “CONFIDENTIAL” only to those classes of persons identified in Paragraph 4 of the Business 

Objects-Cognos Protective Order and for use only in connection with the above-captioned action; 

WHEREAS, the Expert Report of D. Paul Regan, CPA, CFE, dated March 13, 2002, 

Expert Report of Everrett P. Harry, CPA dated August 16, 1999, and the Expert Report of 

Matthew R. Lynde, Ph.D., dated April 10, 2002, produced in the above-captioned action 

(collectively, the “Expert Reports”) were designated “CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY”; 

WHEREAS, the parties now agree to allow the disclosure of the Expert Reports in another 

action pending before this Court, Informatica Corp. v. Business Objects Data Integration, Inc., 

Case No. C 02-3378 JSW (N.D. Cal. filed July 15, 2002) (the “Informatica-Business Objects 

Litigation”), consistent with the limitations on use for documents designated “CONFIDENTIALATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” contained in the Stipulated Protective Order entered in that action, 

a copy of which is Attached as Exhibit A (the “Informatica-Business Objects Protective Order”). 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective 

counsel, subject to approval of the Court, that the Business Objects-Cognos Protective Order be 

amended as follows: 

1. To allow the Expert Reports and materials cited therein to be disclosed, 

summarized, described, characterized, or otherwise communicated or made available in whole or 

in part to outside counsel for Informatica Corp. (“Informatica”) and Business Objects Data 

Integration, Inc. (“BODI”) and regular and temporary employees of such counsel to whom it is 

necessary that the information or material be shown for the purposes of the Informatica-Business 

Objects Litigation; 

2. To allow the Expert Reports and materials cited therein to be disclosed, 

summarized, described, characterized, or otherwise communicated or made available in whole or 

Case 3:00-cv-01816-CRB Document 199 Filed 08/08/06 Page 2 of 5
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] AMENDED STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER (C 00-1816 CRB) 3 

in part to consultants; the Court; court reporters, graphics or design services retained by outside 

counsel for Informatica and BODI for deposition, trial or other court proceedings in the 

Informatica-Business Objects Litigation; nontechnical jury or trial consulting services retained by 

outside counsel for Informatica and BODI in connection with the Informatica-Business Objects 

Litigation; and any other person only upon order of the Court. 

3. Designations on the Expert Reports and materials cited therein shall be treated as if 

also made in the Informatica-Business Objects Litigation and their use shall be subject to the 

limitations and conditions contained in the Informatica-Business Objects Protective Order, e.g., 

the Expert Reports previously designated “Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall be 

treated as if designated in that manner in the Informatica-Business Objects Litigation. 

 4. Any portion of the Business Objects-Cognos Protective Order limiting use of the 

Expert Reports only in connection with the above-captioned action, including but not limited to 

Paragraphs 4, 6, 7, and 8, shall be amended to allow use of the Expert Reports in connection with 

the Informatica-Business Objects Litigation consistent with the above paragraphs. 

Case 3:00-cv-01816-CRB Document 199 Filed 08/08/06 Page 3 of 5
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] AMENDED STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER (C 00-1816 CRB) 4 

Dated: August 2, 2006 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /S/ 

Lynn H. Pasahow 

Attorneys for Defendants 

COGNOS, INC. and COGNOS 

CORPORATION 

Dated: August 2, 2006 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND 

CREW LLP 

By: /S/ 

Daniel J. Furniss 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BUSINESS OBJECTS, S.A. 

 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ______________, 2006 ______________________________________ 

 Charles R. Breyer 

 United States District Judge 

August 07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:00-cv-01816-CRB Document 199 Filed 08/08/06 Page 4 of 5
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] AMENDED STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER (C 00-1816 CRB) 5 

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to General Order 45, I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the 

filing of this document from each of the signatories indicated by a conformed signature (/S/). 

 

 _________________/S/______________ 

 Albert L. Sieber 

Case 3:00-cv-01816-CRB Document 199 Filed 08/08/06 Page 5 of 5