Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03595/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03595-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKA ALFARO,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CIV S-09-3595 FCD KJM PS

LETICIA MARIN,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed April 5, 2010, this court directed plaintiff within twenty one days

to pay the filing fee and ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has paid the filing fee but has not responded to

the order to show cause. There is no subject matter jurisdiction evident in plaintiff’s pleadings.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 110.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

1

Case 2:09-cv-03595-FCD-KJM Document 9 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 11, 2010. 

006

alfaro-marin.ftc

2

Case 2:09-cv-03595-FCD-KJM Document 9 Filed 05/11/10 Page 2 of 2