Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01512/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01512-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN E. MITCHELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. BEARD, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:15-cv-01512 DLB PC

ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW 

SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT AS MOOT

[ECF No. 31]

Plaintiff John E. Mitchell, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 5, 2015.

1

 On January 22, 2016, he 

filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Plaintiff names as Defendants: Sgt. E. Sanchez; Sgt. 

L. Munoz; J. D. Ornealas; M. D. Hunter; Nurse Jane Doe #1; and Nurse John Doe #2. 

On July 22, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to supplement his complaint. On July 29, 2016, 

the Court denied his request to supplement with prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to return 

the lodged supplement to Plaintiff.

On August 1, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw his motion to supplement. 

Because the motion to supplement has already been denied, Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw it is 

moot.

///

///

 

1

Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge on October 16, 2015.

Case 1:15-cv-01512-DAD-GSA Document 32 Filed 08/09/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his motion to 

supplement is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2016 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01512-DAD-GSA Document 32 Filed 08/09/16 Page 2 of 2