Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Locke Lord LLP 

300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2600 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

1 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 

LOCKE LORD LLP

Susan J. Welde, (SBN: 205401) 

swelde@lockelord.com 

300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2600 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Telephone: (213) 485-1500 

Facsimile: (213) 485-1200 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PLAINTIFFS KERRY REARDON, 

JAMES LATHROP, JULIE MCKINNEY, 

SANDEEP PAL, JENNIFER REILLY, 

JUSTIN BARTOLET and JONATHAN 

GRINDELL on behalf of themselves and 

all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05678-JCS

Honorable Joseph C. Spero 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO RESPOND TO AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Complaint Served: Jan. 9, 2015 

Amended Comp. Served: Jan. 30, 2015 

Current Response Due: Feb. 13, 2015 

New Response Date: Feb. 27, 2015

Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (“Uber”) and Plaintiffs KERRY 

REARDON, JAMES LATHROP, JULIE MCKINNEY, SANDEEP PAL, JENNIFER 

REILLY, JUSTIN BARTOLET, and JONATHAN GRINDELL, on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated, (“Plaintiffs”) (collectively the “Parties”), 

by and through their attorneys, hereby jointly stipulate for good cause as follows: 

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 13 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Locke Lord LLP 

300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2600 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

2 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 

1. Plaintiffs have filed an amended complaint on this date, January 30, 

2015. 

2. Plaintiffs have agreed to extend Uber’s deadline to respond to the 

amended complaint for a period not greater than thirty days, from February 13, 2015 

through February 27, 2015. 

3. Accordingly, the Parties jointly stipulate that Uber’s new deadline to 

respond to Plaintiffs’ amended complaint will be February 27, 2015. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 30, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

LOCKE LORD LLP 

By: /s/ Susan J. Welde 

Susan J. Welde 

Attorneys for Defendant UBER 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Dated: January 30, 2015 TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

By: /s/ Hassan A. Zavareei 

Hassan A. Zavareei 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs KERRY REARDON, 

JAMES LATHROP, JULIE MCKINNEY, and 

JONATHAN GRINDELL on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated

Dated: 2/3/15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 13 Filed 02/03/15 Page 2 of 2