Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00956/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00956-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOWARD P. THOMAS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0956 DFL EFB P

vs.

CHARLES F. CRAPOTTA, et al.,.

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On September 14, 2006, plaintiff filed a document entitled “objections” to the

magistrate judge’s August 29, 2006, order denying plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel.

The court construes the objections as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s

order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does

not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

////

////

////

////

////

Case 2:05-cv-00956-DFL-EFB Document 41 Filed 01/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed August 29, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: 1/15/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00956-DFL-EFB Document 41 Filed 01/16/07 Page 2 of 2