Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00929/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00929-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

TOMMY R. KEETON, )

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

SGT. WARREN, et. al., )

) 

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 05-0929 REC DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM 285 FORMS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an amended civil

rights complaint filed on October 18, 2005. The amended complaint appears to state a cognizable

claim for relief against defendants Warren, Gonzales and Olivia for excessive force in violation of

the Eighth Amendment and against defendant Gonzales for deliberate indifference to a serious

medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for defendants Warren, Gonzales and Olivia.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff three (3) USM-285 forms, three (3)

summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the amended complaint filed October 18, 2005.

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall complete the

Case 1:05-cv-00929-LJO-DLB Document 13 Filed 01/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

Court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Four (4) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed October 18, 2005.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 5, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00929-LJO-DLB Document 13 Filed 01/05/06 Page 2 of 2