Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-1_13-cv-00915/USCOURTS-alnd-1_13-cv-00915-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

AARON D. CAUSEY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 1:13-cv-0915-RDP-JEO

)

CHRISTOPHER GORDY, )

WARDEN, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an action on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2254 by Aaron D. Causey, an Alabama state prisoner acting pro

se. (Doc. 1). On June 10, 2015, the Magistrate Judge assigned this case entered a

report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and FED.R.CIV. P. 72(b)(1) recommending

that the action be denied and dismissed. (Doc. 15). No objections have been filed.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materialsin the court

file, including the Magistrate Judge’sReport andRecommendation, the court is of the

opinion that the Magistrate Judge’sfindings are due to be and are hereby ADOPTED

and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. As a result, the petition for writ of habeas

corpus is due to be denied and this action is due to be dismissed with prejudice. 

Further, because the petition does not present issues that are debatable among jurists

FILED

 2015 Aug-03 PM 02:41

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 1:13-cv-00915-RDP-JEO Document 16 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 2
of reason, a certificate of appealability is also due to be denied. See 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000); Rule 11(a), RULES

GOVERNING § 2254 PROCEEDINGS. A separate final judgment will be entered.

DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of August, 2015.

______________________________

R. DAVID PROCTOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICTJUDGE 

2

Case 1:13-cv-00915-RDP-JEO Document 16 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 2