Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05634/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05634-63/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Joseph W. Cotchett 

Paul N. "Pete" McCloskey 

Steven N. Williams 

Adam Zapala 

COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP 

San Francisco Airport Office Center 

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 

Burlingame, CA 94010 

Telephone: 650-697-6000 

Facsimile: 650-697-0577 

Michael D. Hausfeld Michael P. Lehman (77152) 

HAUSFELD LLP Christopher Lebsock (184546) 

1700 K Street, N.W., Suite 650 HAUSFELD LLP 

Washington, D.C. 20006 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400 

Telephone: (202) 540-7200 San Francisco, CA 94104 

 Telephone: (415) 633-1908 

Allan Steyer (100318) Jennie Anderson (203586) 

Jayne A. Peeters (108052) ANDRUS ANDERSON LLP 

Dana M. Andreoli (262068) 155 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 

STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS San Francisco, CA 94104 

 ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP Telephone: (415) 986-1400 

One California Street, Third Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-3400 

Attorneys for Class Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER 

AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION

_____________________________________ 

This Document Relates to:

ALL ACTIONS 

Case No.: C 07-5634 CRB 

MDL No. 1913

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL 

JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING 

TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG 

CHENG ENG

(LETTER ROGATORY)

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 28
-1-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

TO THE REGISTRAR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF SINGAPORE: 

 WHEREAS, the above-captioned coordinated proceedings are pending before this 

Court; 

 WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs allege that Defendants engaged in anticompetitive conduct 

concerning the pricing of passenger fares and fuel surcharges on routes between the U.S. and 

Asia/Oceania; 

 WHEREAS, discovery in the above-captioned coordinated proceedings is currently 

ongoing and has a deadline of completion of January 31, 2014; 

 WHEREAS, it is necessary for the purposes of justice and for the due determination of 

the matters in dispute between the parties that the following person should be examined as a 

witness upon oath touching such matters, namely Huang Cheng Eng, Townhouse Apartments, 

139 Cavenagh Road, #09–01, Singapore (229627), and it appears that such witness is resident 

within your jurisdiction: 

I. REQUEST 

 The United States District Court Northern District of California presents its compliments 

to the Supreme Court of Singapore, and requests international assistance to compel testimony to 

be used in a civil proceeding before this Court in the above-captioned matter. 

 This Court requests, for the reasons previously stated, that the Supreme Court of 

Singapore summon Huang Cheng Eng, Townhouse Apartments, 139 Cavenagh Road, #09–01, 

Singapore (229627), to attend at such time and place as you shall appoint, if possible, prior to 

January 31, 2014, before you or such other person as according to your procedure is competent 

to take the examination of witnesses, and that you will cause such witness to be examined orally 

on the interrogatories and topics which are attached to this letter of request as Attachment A, in 

the presence of the agents of the plaintiffs and defendants on due notice given. 

 In addition, this Courts requests that you will permit the agents of both the plaintiffs and 

defendants to examine upon interrogatories and oral examination on the interrogatories and 

topics which are attached to this letter of request as Attachment A or arising out of the answers 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 2 of 28
-2-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

thereto, such witness, and permit the cross-examination of the said witness upon crossinterrogatories and oral examination, and permit the party producing the witness for 

examination to examine him orally, or permit the agents of both the plaintiffs and defendants to 

attend the deposition and taken evidence by video-link. 

 In addition, this Courts requests that you will be pleased to cause the evidence of the 

said witness (and the answers of the said witness and all additional oral questions, whether on 

examination, cross-examination or re-examination) to be reduced into writing and all books, 

letters, papers and documents produced on such examination to be duly marked for 

identification, and that you will be further pleased to authenticate such examination by the seal 

of your tribunal or in such other way as is in accordance with your procedure and to return it 

together with the interrogatories and cross-interrogatories and a note of the charges and 

expenses payable in respect of the execution of this request through the counsel from whom the 

same was received for transmission to the United States District Court of the Northern District 

of California. 

 In addition, this Court requests that you will cause the agents of the parties appointed to 

be informed of the date and place where the examination is to take place. Their contact 

information is as follows: 

Allan Steyer 

Jayne A. Peeters 

Dana M. Andreoli 

STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP 

One California Street, Third Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-3400 

Facsimile: (415) 421-2234 

Jennie Lee Anderson 

ANDRUS ANDERSON LLP 

155 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415.986.1400 

Facsimile: 415.986.1474 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Rachel Diller 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 3 of 28
-3-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Ashley Marie Bauer 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111-6538 

Telephone: 415-395-8138 

Facsimile: 415-395-8095 

William Sherman 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

555 11th Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Telephone: 202-637-2200 

Facsimile: 202-637-2201 

Attorneys for Defendant Singapore Airlines 

II. FACTS OF THE CASE 

 Plaintiffs Micah Abrams, Meor Adlin, Franklyn Ajaye, Andrew Barton, Brenden G. 

Maloof, Rachel Diller, Scott Frederick, David Kuo, Dickson Leung, Donald Wortman, Harley 

Oda, Roy Onomura, Shinsuke Kobayashi, Patricia Lee, Nancy Kajiyama, on her own behalf and 

on behalf of Noboru Kajiyama [deceased], Della Ewing Chow, James Kawaguchi, individually 

and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed the complaint in this action under Section 16 

of the Clayton Act, (15 U.S.C. §26). The Second Amended Class Action Complaint in this 

matter seeks to obtain injunctive relief for violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act 

(15 U.S.C. §1) and to recover damages and/or restitution based on claims that Defendants Air 

France, Air New Zealand, All Nippon Airways, Cathay Pacific Airways, China Airlines, Eva 

Airways, Japan Airlines International, KLM Royal Dutch Airline, Malaysia Airlines, 

Malaysian Airline System Berhad, Philippine Airlines, Inc., Qantas Airways, Ltd., Singapore 

Airlines, Thai Airways, United Airlines, and Vietnam Airlines engaged in anticompetitive 

conduct concerning the pricing of passenger fares and fuel surcharges on routes between the 

U.S. and Asia/Oceania from approximately January 2000 through at least July 2011 that caused 

plaintiffs and individuals similarly situated to pay artificially high and non-competitive prices 

for tickets for air passenger travel in the United States. 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 4 of 28
-4-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

III. RECIPROCITY 

 The United States District Court for the Northern District of California would be willing 

to provide similar assistance to the Supreme Court of Singapore. 

IV. REIMBURSEMENT FOR COSTS 

 Counsel for the Plaintiffs have represented that they are willing to reimburse the 

Supreme Court of Singapore for costs incurred in executing this Letter Rogatory in an amount 

not to exceed Two Thousand dollars ($2000.00) in United States Dollars. If the costs for 

executing this Letter Rogatory will exceed USD $2000, please contact counsel for the Plaintiffs 

before exceeding this amount. Their contact information is as follows: 

Allan Steyer 

Jayne A. Peeters 

Dana M. Andreoli 

STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP 

One California Street, Third Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-3400 

Facsimile: (415) 421-2234 

Jennie Lee Anderson 

ANDRUS ANDERSON LLP 

155 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415.986.1400 

Facsimile: 415.986.1474 

 The Court extends to the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Singapore assurances of its 

highest consideration. 

 

Dated: ___________________ By: _____________________________ 

 Hon. Judge Donna M. Ryu 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

 

12/23/2013

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 5 of 28
-5-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Attachment A: Questions for Huang Cheng Eng 

1. What is your full name? 

2. When were you employed with Singapore Airlines? 

 a. What positions did you hold at Singapore Airlines? 

 b. What were the dates that you held each of those positions? 

 c. What were your responsibilities and duties for each of those positions? 

 d. Were you involved in setting Singapore Airlines’ fuel surcharges? 

i. If yes, how did Singapore Airlines decide to initially impose a fuel 

surcharge and in what amount? 

ii. If yes, what were the criteria used to determine the fuel surcharges 

imposed? 

iii. If yes, how did Singapore Airlines decide how much to change the fuel 

surcharge for Singapore Airlines? 

iv. If yes, did Singapore Airlines ever change the fuel surcharge for 

Singapore Airlines flights flying to and from the United States? 

v. If yes, when did Singapore Airlines make those changes to fuel 

surcharges for Singapore Airlines flights flying to and from the United States? 

vi. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines had authority to change or control the 

Singapore Airlines fuel surcharge? 

What was their title? 

When were they employed with Singapore Airlines? 

Who did they report to? 

Who were their direct reports? 

vii. If no, who did have authority? 

What was their title? 

When were they employed with Singapore Airlines? 

Who did they report to? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 6 of 28
-6-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Who were their direct reports? 

Did you ever communicate with these people about changing fuel 

surcharges for Singapore Airline flights to or from the United States? 

 If yes, when? 

 If yes, what was said? 

e. Were you involved in setting Singapore Airlines’ fares? 

i. If yes, what were the criteria used to determine Singapore Airlines’ fares?

ii. If yes, how did Singapore Airlines decide how much to change the fares 

for Singapore Airlines? 

iii. If yes, did Singapore Airlines ever change the fares for Singapore 

Airlines flights flying to and from the United States? 

iv. If yes, when did Singapore Airlines make those changes to fares for 

Singapore Airlines flights flying to and from the United States? 

v. If yes, who else at Singapore Airlines had authority to change or control 

the Singapore Airlines fares? 

What was their title? 

When were they employed with Singapore Airlines? 

Who did they report to? 

Who were their direct reports? 

vi. If no, who did have authority to change or control the Singapore Airlines 

fares? 

What was their title? 

When were they employed with Singapore Airlines? 

Who did they report to? 

Who were their direct reports? 

Did you ever communicate with these people about changing fuel 

surcharges for Singapore Airline flights to or from the United States? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 7 of 28
-7-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

If yes, when? 

If yes, what was said? 

3. Were you employed with other airlines? 

 a. If yes, with what other airlines were you employed? 

 b. If yes, what dates were you employed at each of the other airlines? 

 c. If yes, what positions did you hold at each of the other airlines? 

 d. If yes, what were your responsibilities/duties at each of the other airlines? 

4. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you directly communicate with 

other airlines regarding fuel surcharges? 

 a. What airlines? 

 b. With whom did you communicate? 

 c. When did you communicate with them? 

 d. What was communicated? 

 e. Why? 

5. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you directly communicate with 

other airlines regarding fares? 

 a. What airlines? 

 b. With whom did you communicate? 

 c. When did you communicate with them? 

 d. What was communicated? 

 e. Why? 

6. Were you aware of anyone else at Singapore Airlines who directly communicates with 

other airlines regarding fuel surcharges? 

 a. Who? What were their names and titles? 

b. What airlines and with whom did they communicate with? 

 c. When did they communicate with the other airlines? 

 d. What was communicated? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 8 of 28
-8-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 e. Why? 

7. Were you aware of anyone else at Singapore Airlines who directly communicates with 

other airlines regarding fares? 

 a. Who? What were their names and titles? 

b. What airlines and with whom did they communicate with? 

 c. When did they communicate with the other airlines? 

 d. What was communicated? 

 e. Why? 

8. Did Singapore Airlines coordinate with other airlines regarding whether to impose fuel 

surcharges? 

 a. If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect flights to or from the United States? 

9. Did Singapore Airlines coordinate with other airlines regarding the amount of fuel 

surcharges to be imposed on any given flight? 

 a. If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect flights to or from the United States? 

10. Did Singapore Airlines coordinate with other airlines regarding the amount of fares to be 

charged for any given flight? 

 a. If yes, did these fares affect flights to or from the United States? 

11. Did Singapore Airlines agree with other airlines to raise fuel surcharges if another 

airline raised their fuel surcharge? 

 a. If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect flights to or from the United States? 

12. Did Singapore Airlines agree with other airlines to raise fares if another airline raised 

their fares? 

 a. If yes, did these fares affect flights to or from the United States? 

13. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Cathay Pacific Airways regarding fuel surcharges? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 9 of 28
-9-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

b. If yes, who at Cathay Pacific participated in these communications? What were 

their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Cathay Pacific Airways to impose fuel 

surcharges if Cathay Pacific Airways raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Cathay Pacific Airways to coordinate the 

amount of fuel surcharges to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

h. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Cathay Pacific Airways to raise fuel 

surcharges if Cathay Pacific Airways raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

14. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Cathay Pacific Airways regarding fares? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who at Cathay Pacific participated in these communications? What were 

their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 10 of 28
-10-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Cathay Pacific Airways to coordinate the 

amount of fares to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

h. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Cathay Pacific Airways to raise fares if 

Cathay Pacific Airways raised their fares? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

15. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with All Nippon Airways regarding fuel surcharges? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who All Nippon Airways participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with All Nippon Airways to impose fuel 

surcharges if All Nippon Airways raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with All Nippon Airways to coordinate the amount 

of fuel surcharges to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

h. Did Singapore Airlines agree with All Nippon Airways to raise fuel surcharges if 

All Nippon Airways raised their fuel surcharge? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 11 of 28
-11-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

16. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with All Nippon Airways regarding fares? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who at All Nippon Airways participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with All Nippon Airways to coordinate the amount 

of fares to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with All Nippon Airways to raise fares if All 

Nippon Airways raised their fares? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

17. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with China Airlines regarding fuel surcharges? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who China Airlines participated in these communications? What were 

their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 12 of 28
-12-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with China Airlines to impose fuel surcharges if 

China Airlines raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with China Airlines to coordinate the amount of 

fuel surcharges to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

h. Did Singapore Airlines agree with China Airlines to raise fuel surcharges if 

China Airlines raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

18. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with China Airlines regarding fares? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who at China Airlines participated in these communications? What were 

their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with China Airlines to coordinate the amount of 

fares to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 13 of 28
-13-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with China Airlines to raise fares if China Airlines 

raised their fares? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

19. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Malaysia Airlines regarding fuel surcharges? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who Malaysia Airlines participated in these communications? What were 

their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Malaysia Airlines to impose fuel surcharges if 

China Airlines raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Malaysia Airlines to coordinate the amount of 

fuel surcharges to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

h. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Malaysia Airlines to raise fuel surcharges if 

Malaysia Airlines raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

20. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Malaysia Airlines regarding fares? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 14 of 28
-14-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who at Malaysia Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Malaysia Airlines to coordinate the amount of 

fares to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Malaysia Airlines to raise fares if Malaysia 

Airlines raised their fares? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

21. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Philippine Airlines regarding fuel surcharges? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who Philippine Airlines participated in these communications? What were 

their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Philippine Airlines to impose fuel surcharges 

if Philippine Airlines raised their fuel surcharge? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 15 of 28
-15-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Philippine Airlines to coordinate the amount 

of fuel surcharges to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

h. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Philippine Airlines to raise fuel surcharges if 

Philippine Airlines raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

22. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Philippine Airlines regarding fares? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who at Philippine Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Philippine Airlines to coordinate the amount 

of fares to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

h. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Philippine Airlines to raise fares if Philippine 

Airlines raised their fares? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 16 of 28
-16-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

23. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Thai Airways regarding fuel surcharges? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who Thai Airways participated in these communications? What were their 

names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Thai Airways to impose fuel surcharges if 

Thai Airways raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Thai Airways to coordinate the amount of fuel 

surcharges to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

h. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Thai Airways to raise fuel surcharges if Thai 

Airways raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

24. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Thai Airways regarding fares? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 17 of 28
-17-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

b. If yes, who at Thai Airways participated in these communications? What were 

their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Thai Airways to coordinate the amount of 

fares to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Thai Airways to raise fares if Thai Airways 

raised their fares? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

25. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Vietnam Airlines regarding fuel surcharges? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who Vietnam Airlines participated in these communications? What were 

their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Vietnam Airlines to impose fuel surcharges if 

Vietnam Airways raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 18 of 28
-18-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Vietnam Airlines to coordinate the amount of 

fuel surcharges to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

h. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Vietnam Airlines to raise fuel surcharges if 

Vietnam Airlines raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

26. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Vietnam Airlines regarding fares? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who at Vietnam Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Vietnam Airlines to coordinate the amount of 

fares to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Vietnam Airlines to raise fares if Vietnam 

Airlines raised their fares? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

27. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Japan Airlines regarding fuel surcharges? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 19 of 28
-19-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who Japan Airlines participated in these communications? What were 

their names and titles? 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Japan Airlines to impose fuel surcharges if 

Japan Airlines raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Japan Airlines to coordinate the amount of 

fuel surcharges to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

h. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Japan Airlines to raise fuel surcharges if Japan 

Airlines raised their fuel surcharge? 

(1) If yes, did these fuel surcharges affect/concern flights to or from the 

United States? 

28. When you were employed at Singapore Airlines, did you or anyone who reported to you 

communicate with Japan Airlines regarding fares? 

a. If yes, who at Singapore Airlines participated in these communications? What 

were their names and titles? 

b. If yes, who at Japan Airlines participated in these communications? What were 

their names and titles? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 20 of 28
-20-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

c. How did these communications take place? I.E. by telephone, over email, in 

person, facsimile? 

d. When did these communications take place? 

 e. What was communicated? 

f. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Japan Airlines to coordinate the amount of 

fares to be imposed on any given flight? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

g. Did Singapore Airlines agree with Japan Airlines to raise fares if Japan Airlines 

raised their fares? 

(1) If yes, did these fares affect/concern flights to or from the United States? 

29. With respect to each document identified in ATTACHMENT B, a copy of which will be 

provided to you, answer the following: 

 a. Are you familiar with this document? 

 b. Have you seen this document before? 

 c. Please explain what this document is. 

d. When did you first see this document? 

 (1) Was this in connection with your employment at SIA? 

 (2) If yes, what was your position and responsibilities at the time? 

 e. Are you the author of this document? 

(1) Were you in any way involved in the preparation of this document? 

(2) Explain your involvement. 

(3) If applicable, what does it mean to be “sponsored” or “approved” by you?

(4) Did you send this document to anyone? 

 i. If yes, who? 

 ii. If yes, why? 

f. What was the purpose of this document? 

 g. Did you receive this document? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 21 of 28
-21-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(1) If yes, why was it sent to you? 

(2) If yes, how did you respond? 

 h. Please explain the roles of the other individuals named in this document at the 

time this document originated. 

 (1) What company did each such individual work for? 

 (2) Was the company a competitor of SIA? 

 (3) What position did each such individual hold and what were his or her 

responsibilities? 

 (4) What was your relationship with each such individual? 

 (5) How frequently did you communicate with each such individual? 

 (6) How did you communicate with him or her, e.g., letter, email, telephone, 

in person, etc. 

 i. Were there any follow-up communications, e.g., letter, email, telephone, in 

person, etc., to this document? 

 j. Did you discuss this document with anyone at SIA? 

 (1) If yes, with whom (name, position, responsibilities)? 

 (2) If yes, when? 

 (3) If yes, please describe your discussions. 

 (4) If yes, did you or anyone at SIA come to any conclusions? 

 k. Did you discuss this document with anyone outside of SIA? 

 (1) If yes, with whom (name, company, position, responsibilities)? 

 (2) If yes, when? 

 (3) If yes, please describe your discussions. 

 (4) If yes, did you come to any agreement regarding the matters described in 

the document? 

 (5) Did you come to any agreement regarding future conduct of SIA and/or 

any competitor? 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 22 of 28
-22-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ATTACHMENT B

Exhibit 1 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Dirk van Nieuwkerk to Ee Kim 

Lye regarding “AW: Good Morning”, dated May 12, 2004, produced by SIA and identified as 

SIA_11_000198616 - SIA_11_000198617 

Exhibit 2 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Subhas Menon to Kian Hai Cheng 

etc. regarding “Fw: Fuel surcharge”, dated May 12, 2004, produced by SIA and identified as 

SIA_08_000148431 

Exhibit 3 is a copy of a paper entitled “IMPLEMENTATION OF FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated 

May 13, 2004, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000026793 - SIA_11_000026794 

Exhibit 4 is a copy of a paper entitled “IMPLEMENTATION OF FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated 

May 21, 2004, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000113063 - SIA_11_000113066 

Exhibit 5 is a copy of a paper entitled “IMPLEMENTATION OF FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated 

May 21, 2004, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000128937 - SIA_11_000128941 

Exhibit 6 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Kazuhisa Okamoto to Lee SekEng 

etc. regarding “JAPAN FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated December 28, 2004, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000201926 - SIA_11_000201932 

Exhibit 7 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Ee Kim Lye to Constance Wong 

regarding “JAPAN FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated December 30, 2004, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000211721 - SIA_11_000211725 

Exhibit 8 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Ee Kim Lye to Constance Wong 

regarding “JAPAN FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated December 30, 2004, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000211726 - SIA_11_000211731 

Exhibit 9 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Huang Cheng Eng to Ee Kim Lye 

regarding “fuel surcharge”, dated September 21, 2005, produced by SIA and identified as 

SIA_11_000197434 - SIA_11_000197435 

Exhibit 10 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Huang Cheng Eng to YauSeng 

Chin regarding “SQ JAPAN FUEL SURCHARGE APR-SEP06", dated February 22, 2006, 

produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000046149 - SIA_11_000046154 

Exhibit 11 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from PheeTeik Yeoh to Ee Kim Lye 

regarding “SQ JAPAN FUEL SURCHARGE APR-SEP06", dated February 27, 2006, produced 

by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000046659 - SIA_11_000046668 

Exhibit 12 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from PheeTeik Yeoh to Ee Kim Lye 

regarding “SQ JAPAN FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated March 1, 2006, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000047272 - SIA_11_000047282 

Exhibit 13 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Yvette Lee to PheeTeik Yeoh 

etc. regarding “JAPAN FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated May 2, 2007, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000247518 - SIA_11_000247521 

Exhibit 14 is a copy of a paper entitled “BOARD BOOK, ALLIANCE MANAGEMENT 

BOARD MEETING”, dated September 5-6, 2007, produced by ANA and identified as ANA00612419 - ANA-00612433 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 23 of 28
-23-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Exhibit 15 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Joey Kwek to Claudia Chia etc. 

regarding “CFM: Internal Discussion on IATA proposal on 11Feb08 Mon 1500hrs MCR3", 

dated January 29, 2008, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000224363 - 

SIA_11_000224366 

Exhibit 16 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from PheeTeik Yeoh to Matthew Raos 

and Yvette Lee regarding “IATA follow up”, dated February 5, 2008, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000225020 - SIA_11_000225023 

Exhibit 17 is a copy of a paper entitled “BOARD BOOK, ALLIANCE MANAGEMENT 

BOARD MEETING”, dated July 15-16, 2009. 

Exhibit 18 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA FUEL SURCHARGE - ROLLBACK PROGRAM”, 

dated February 2005, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000037778 - 

SIA_11_000037780. 

Exhibit 19 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA FUEL SURCHARGE - ROLLBACK PROGRAM”, 

dated February 2005, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000037781 - 

SIA_11_000037784. 

Exhibit 20 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 16/06, August 

2006, REVIEW OF SIA’S FUEL SURCHARGES”, produced by SIA and identified as 

SIA_11_000055185 - SIA_11_000055187. 

Exhibit 21 is a copy of a paper entitled “IMPLEMENTATION OF FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated 

May 13, 2004, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000114878 - SIA_11_000114879. 

Exhibit 22 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Huang Cheng Eng to Ee Kim 

Lye etc. regarding “filing of fuel surcharge by CX”, dated May 19, 2004, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000112849. 

Exhibit 23 is a copy of a paper entitled “IMPLEMENTATION OF FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated 

May 19, 2004, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000209750 - SIA_11_000209752. 

Exhibit 24 is a copy of a letter from Huang Cheng Eng to Vice Presidents, General Managers, 

and State Managers regarding “IMPLEMENTATION OF FARE INCREASES TO OFFSET 

RISING FUEL COST”, dated May 27, 2004, produced by SIA and identified as 

SIA_11_000113006. 

Exhibit 25 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated October 29, 2004, 

produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000034239 – SIA_11_000034253. 

Exhibit 26 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA FUEL SURCHARGE - ROLLBACK”, dated 

February 8, 2005, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000037774 - SIA_11_000037777. 

Exhibit 27 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA FUEL SURCHARGE - ROLLBACK PROGRAM”, 

dated February 18, 2005, produce by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000037785 - 

SIA_11_000037788. 

Exhibit 28 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA FUEL SURCHARGE - ROLLBACK PROGRAM”, 

dated February 18, 2005, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000037789 - 

SIA_11_000037791. 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 24 of 28
-24-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Exhibit 29 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA FUEL SURCHARGE - ROLLBACK PROGRAM”, 

dated February 18, 2005, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000102775 - 

SIA_11_000102779. 

Exhibit 30 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA FUEL SURCHARGE - ROLLBACK PROGRAM”, 

dated February 18, 2005, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000210269 - 

SIA_11_000210271. 

Exhibit 31 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Ian Lorigan to Ee Kim Lye and 

Constance Wong regarding “Fuel surcharge”, dated July 14, 2005, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000111704 - SIA_11_000111708. 

Exhibit 32 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from PheeTeik Yeoh to Ee Kim Lye 

etc. regarding “Fuel Surcharge”, dated August 31, 2005, produced by SIA and identified as 

SIA_11_000197384 - SIA_11_000197385. 

Exhibit 33 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from YokeSan Tham to Ee Kim Lye 

and PheeTeik Yeoh regarding “Fuel Surcharge”, dated August 31, 2005, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000197428 - SIA_11_000197430. 

Exhibit 34 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from LikHsin Lee to Constance Wong 

etc. regarding “SQ China: Fuel Surcharge”, dated September 23, 2005, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000196834 - SIA_11_000196835. 

Exhibit 35 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from PheeTeik Yeoh to Ee Kim Lye 

regarding “fuel surcharge”, dated September 24, 2005, produced by SIA and identified as 

SIA_11_000197431 - SIA_11_000197432. 

Exhibit 36 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Ee Kim Lye to ChiewPeng Lam 

regarding “SQ China: Fuel Surcharge”, dated September 26, 2005, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000213225 - SIA_11_000213227. 

Exhibit 37 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Subhas Menon to Huang Cheng 

Eng etc. regarding “Baggage Harmonization”, dated November 17, 2005, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_04_000006537 - SIA_04_000006540. 

Exhibit 38 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from David Goh to Tadashi Sato etc. 

regarding “Baggage Harmonization”, dated November 28, 2005, produced by SIA and identified 

as SIA_06_000032877 - SIA_06_000032880. 

Exhibit 39 is a copy of an email string the last of which is from Subhas Menon to Ee Kim Lye 

etc. regarding “3rd Tier Fuel Surcharge”, dated July 28, 2006, produced by SIA_11_000005593 - 

SIA_11_000005594. 

Exhibit 40 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 29/06, 03 August 

2006, THIRD TIER FUEL SURCHARGE”, produced by SIA and identified as 

SIA_11_000037758 - SIA_11_000037760. 

Exhibit 41 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 33/06, 06 

September 2006, REVIEW OF SIA’S FUEL SURCHARGES AND INTRODUCTION OF A 

NEW TIER”, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000052947 - SIA_11_000052949. 

Exhibit 42 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 37/06, 04 

October 2006, REVIEW OF SIA’S FUEL SURCHARGES”, produced by SIA and identified as 

SIA_11_000026828 - SIA_11_000026830. 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 25 of 28
-25-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Exhibit 43 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 37/06, 04 

October 2006, REVIEW OF SIA’S FUEL SURCHARGES”, produced by SIA and identified as 

SIA_11_000196256 - SIA_11_000196258. 

Exhibit 44 is a copy of a paper entitled “MINUTES OF REVENUE & NETWORK 

PERFORMANCE COMMITTEE (RNPC)”, dated April 1, 2008, produced by SIA, identified as 

SIA_01_000034819 - SIA_01_000034822. 

Exhibit 45 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Meeting, 16/08, Wed-16 Apr 2008, 

AGENDA”, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_01_000042453 - SIA_01_000042468. 

Exhibit 46 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting xx/08, 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008, REVIEW OF SIA CURRENT 3-TIER FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated 

May 7, 2008, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000067447 - SIA_11_000067449. 

Exhibit 47 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting xx/08, 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008, REVIEW OF SIA CURRENT 3-TIER FUEL SURCHARGE”, dated 

May 7, 2008, produced by SIA and identified as SIA_11_000172844 - SIA_11_000172847. 

Exhibit 48 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting xx/08, 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008, REVIEW OF SIA 3-TIER FUEL SURCHARGE”, by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000067614 - SIA_11_000067617. 

Exhibit 49 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 27/08, 

Wednesday, 09 July 2008, REVIEW OF SIA 3-TIER FUEL SURCHARGE”, by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000070025 - SIA_11_000070029. 

Exhibit 50 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting xx/08, 

Wednesday, 16 July 2008, REVIEW OF SIA 3-TIER FUEL SURCHARGE”, produced by SIA 

and identified as SIA_11_000029928 - SIA_11_000029933. 

Exhibit 51 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 29/08, Tuesday, 

22 July 2008, REVIEW OF SIA’S 3-TIER FUEL SURCHARGE”, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000030054 - SIA_11_000030059 

Exhibit 52 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 29/08, 

Wednesday, 23 July 2008, REVIEW OF SIA’S 3-TIER FUEL SURCHARGE”, produced by 

SIA and identified as SIA_11_000070032 - SIA_11_000070036. 

Exhibit 53 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 32/08, 

Wednesday 13 August 2008, REVIEW OF SIA’S FUEL SURCHARGES”, produced by SIA 

and identified as SIA_11_000029571 - SIA_11_000029574. 

Exhibit 54 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 32/08, 

Wednesday, 13 August 2008, REVIEW OF SIA’S FUEL SURCHARGES”, produced by SIA 

and identified as SIA_11_000070812 - SIA_11_000070815. 

Exhibit 55 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 32/08, 

Wednesday, 13 August 2008, REVIEW OF SIA’S FUEL SURCHARGES”, produced by SIA 

and identified as SIA_11_000076075 - SIA_11_000076079. 

Exhibit 56 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 35/08, 

Wednesday, 03 September 2008, REVIEW OF SIA’S FUEL SURCHARGES”, produced by SIA 

and identified as SIA_11_000038447 - SIA_11_000038451. 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 26 of 28
-26-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Exhibit 57 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 35/08, 

Wednesday 03 September 2008, REVIEW OF SIA’S FUEL SURCHARGES”, produced by SIA 

and identified as SIA_11_000038457 - SIA_11_000038460. 

Exhibit 58 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 35/08, Thursday 

04 September 2008, REVIEW OF SIA’S FUEL SURCHARGES”, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000076910 - SIA_11_000076914. 

Exhibit 59 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 39/08, Thursday, 

02 October 2008, REVIEW OF SIA’S FUEL SURCHARGES”, produced by SIA and identified 

as SIA_11_000038416 - SIA_11_000038420. 

Exhibit 60 is a copy of a paper entitled “SIA Management Committee Meeting 39/08, 

Wednesday, 08 October 2008, REVIEW OF SIA FUEL SURCHARGES”, produced by SIA and 

identified as SIA_11_000030418 - SIA_11_000030422. 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 27 of 28
-27-

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG 

ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) 

CASE NO. C07-5634 CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on December 20, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing 

REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE REGARDING TAKING 

DEPOSITION OF HUANG CHENG ENG (LETTER ROGATORY) with the Clerk of the Court 

using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all attorneys of record 

registered for electronic filing. 

 /s/ Dana M. Andreoli 

 Dana M. Andreoli 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 804 Filed 12/23/13 Page 28 of 28