Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00935/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00935-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Petitioner has included with his objections a request for release on his own

recognizance or on bail during the pendency of this action. For the reasons set forth in the

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, petitioner’s habeas corpus application must be

dismissed without prejudice. A fortiori, his request for release on bail will be denied.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN MONTUE,

Petitioner, No. CIV-S-05-0935 LKK JFM P 

vs.

TERESA A. SCHWARTZ, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 1, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.1

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00935-LKK -JFM Document 9 Filed 08/11/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 1, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner’s request for release on his own recognizance or reasonable bail is

denied; and

3. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).

DATED: August 10, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/mont0935.804

Case 2:05-cv-00935-LKK -JFM Document 9 Filed 08/11/05 Page 2 of 2