Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01215/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01215-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 8:1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing

---

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2729

Attorneys for Respondents

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GURPREET KAUR, et al., ) CV 05-F-1215 REC DLB

)

Petitioners, )

)

v. )

) STIPULATION RE:

Michael Chertoff, et al. ) RESPONDENTS’ ANSWER AND

) ORDER

)

Respondents. )

__________________________________________)

On November 30, 2005, respondents filed a Joint Stipulation setting the date for the filing

of respondents’ answer on January 30, 2006. In that Joint Stipulation, respondents indicated that

Citizenship and Immigration Services was working to adjudicate the applications for citizenship and

that the matter may be resolved if given the extra time. Since the filing of that Joint Stipulation,

petitioners’ name checks have been cleared by the FBI, and all that remains before petitioners’

naturalization applications can be favorably adjudicated is a re-submission of fingerprint data and

the oath ceremony. The government expects this process to be complete by March 6, 2006.

Accordingly, the parties stipulate that the time for filing the government’s answer be extended to

Case 1:05-cv-01215-REC-DLB Document 20 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 2
March 6, 2006, and that the Joint Scheduling Conference Report will be filed by March 13, 2006.

The Scheduling Conference, if necessary, will be reset from February 14, 2006, to a date after March

6, 2006. 

Dated: January 30, 2006 Respectfully Submitted,

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/Audrey Hemesath

Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Respondents

By: /s/ James Makasian

James M. Makasian

Attorney for the Petitioners

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the respondent’s Answer is due on March 6, 2006, and the Joint Scheduling

Conference Report is due on March 13, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 31, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01215-REC-DLB Document 20 Filed 01/31/06 Page 2 of 2