Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-02234/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-02234-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision

---

{7011/005/00252404.DOC} 1

________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JONES HELSLEY PC

8365 N. Fresno Street, Suite 310

Post Office Box 28340

Fresno, California 93729

Telephone: (559) 233-4800

Facsimile: (559) 233-9330

Timothy Jones #119841

John P. Kinsey #215916

Attorneys for: Plaintiffs Rocky Mountain Farmers Union; Redwood County Minnesota Corn 

And Soybeans Growers; Penny Newman Grain, Inc.; Fresno County Farm 

Bureau; Nisei Farmers League; California Dairy Campaign; Rex Nederend; 

Growth Energy and the Renewable Fuels Association

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION; 

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JAMES N. GOLDSTENE,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:09-CV-02234-LJO-DLB

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

FURTHER CONTINUE 

MANDATORY SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE

NATIONAL PETROCHEMICAL & 

REFINERS ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JAMES GOLDSTENE, et al.,

Defendants

Related with Case No.:

1:10-CV-00163-LJO-DLB

And related intervenor actions

///

///

///

Case 1:09-cv-02234-LJO-BAM Document 90 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 3
{7011/005/00252404.DOC} 2

________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS the Mandatory Scheduling Conferences scheduled in the related 

actions of Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al. v. Goldstene, Case No. 1:09-CV-02234-LJODLB (the “RMFU Action”), and National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, et al. v. 

Goldstene, et al., Case No. 1:10-CV-00163-LJO-DLB (the “NPRA Action”) are presently set 

for July 28, 2010, in Courtroom No. 9, at 9:00 a.m. and 9:15 a.m.

WHEREAS the Defendants in the RMFU Action and the NPRA Action recently 

filed their Answers on July 14, 2010.

WHEREAS both the Plaintiffs in RMFU and NPRA Actions and Defendants 

have agreed to stipulate to continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conferences in the above 

actions, to provide the parties additional time to meet and confer regarding their Joint 

Scheduling Conference Statements.

WHEREAS additional time to meet and confer regarding the Joint Scheduling 

Conference Statements is necessary to allow the parties to further discuss which facts and/or 

legal issues in the above actions are disputed or undisputed.

WHEREAS all parties are available to conduct the Mandatory Scheduling 

Conferences in these actions on September 9, 2010, and have agreed to hold it on this date, 

pending approval by the Court.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs in both actions and 

Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, that: 

1. The Mandatory Scheduling Conferences in the above-captioned actions, 

previously scheduled for July 28, 2010, should be continued to September 9, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., 

or such time as may be set by the Court, in Courtroom 9 (6th Floor).

2. The parties shall serve their initial disclosures under Rule 26 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 14 days following the September 9, 2010, 

Mandatory Scheduling Conferences.

///

///

///

Case 1:09-cv-02234-LJO-BAM Document 90 Filed 07/23/10 Page 2 of 3
{7011/005/00252404.DOC} 3

________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: July 16, 2010 STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

By: /s/ Mark Poole 

Mark Poole, 

Attorneys for All Defendants

Dated: July 22, 2010 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: /s/ Marie C. Fiala

Marie C. Fiala, 

Attorneys for the NPRA Plaintiffs

Dated: July 22, 2010 JONES HELSLEY PC

By: /s/ John P. Kinsey

John P. Kinsey, 

Attorneys for the RMFU Plaintiffs

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing 

therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conferences in the 

above-captioned actions, previously scheduled for July 28, 2010, shall be continued to 

September 9, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 (6th Floor).

IT IS ALSO ORDERED that the parties shall serve their initial disclosures 

under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 14 days following the 

September 9, 2010, Mandatory Scheduling Conferences.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 22, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

3b142a

Case 1:09-cv-02234-LJO-BAM Document 90 Filed 07/23/10 Page 3 of 3