Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06543/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06543-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

KYL_SF682140 

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 

Case No. C 12-6543 JCS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILIP A. MCLEOD, CASB No. 101101

philip.mcleod@kyl.com 

WILL P. RIFFELMACHER, CASB No. 273848 

will.riffelmacher@kyl.com 

KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN 

A Professional Corporation 

450 Pacific Avenue 

San Francisco, California 94133 

Telephone: (415) 398-6000 

Facsimile: (415) 981-0136 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (erroneously sued as 

“J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a Limited Liability Company”) 

RYAN F. THOMAS, CASB No. 230491 

rthomas@johnstonthomas.com 

JOHNSTON | THOMAS, Attorneys At Law 

1400 North Dutton Avenue, Suite 21 

Santa Rosa, CA 95405 

Telephone: (707) 545-6542 

Facsimile: (707) 545-1522 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DAEMEON REIYDELLE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DAEMEON REIYDELLE, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a Limited 

Liability Company, and DOES 1 through 10, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 12-6543 JCS 

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT 

STATEMENT 

Date: June 26, 2015 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

Location: Courtroom G, 15th Floor 

Case 3:12-cv-06543-JCS Document 102 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 4
- 2 - KYL_SF683757 

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 

Case No. C 12-6543 JCS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (“Chase” or “Defendant”) and plaintiff 

DAEMEON REIYDELLE (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, “the Parties”) submit this JOINT CASE 

MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and [PROPOSED] ORDER pursuant to the Standing Order for All 

Judges of the Northern District of California dated July 1, 2011 and Civil Local Rule 16-9. 

I. SETTLEMENT AND ADR 

Plaintiff and Defendant agreed on settlement terms at a Settlement Conference with United 

States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Laporte on March 20, 2015. The settlement terms were filed under 

seal. See ECF 87. 

On June 15, 2015, the Court issued a Civil Minute Order (“Order”) directing that a “senior 

executive level officer from JP Morgan Chase Bank must be present on June 26, 2015 to respond to 

the Court’s query, or in the alternative, disclose the type of 1099 that will be issued based on the 

agreed upon settlement.” ECF 97; see also ECF 100. 

Pursuant to this Court’s Order, Chase advised Plaintiff’s counsel on June 15, 2015 in writing 

that Chase will report the amount of principal forgiveness on a Form 1099-C and the cash payment on 

a Form 1099-MISC. 

The next step in the settlement process is for Plaintiff to send Defendant’s counsel the signed 

settlement agreement and Form W-9. 

II. REQUEST TO CONTINUE THE JUNE 26, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT 

 CONFERENCE 

Because Chase provided Plaintiff’s counsel with information regarding the Form 1099s that it 

will issue, the Parties respectfully request that the June 26, 2015 CMC be continued to a date after 

August 26, 2015 to allow them time to complete the settlement. 

DATED: June 19, 2015 /s/ Ryan F. Thomas 

RYAN F. THOMAS 

 JOHNSTON THOMAS, Attorneys at law 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 DAEMEON REIYDELLE 

Case 3:12-cv-06543-JCS Document 102 Filed 06/23/15 Page 2 of 4
- 3 - KYL_SF683757

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 

Case No. C 12-6543 JCS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: June 19, 2015 /s/ Philip A. McLeod 

PHILIP A. MCLEOD 

WILL P. RIFFELMACHER 

KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 

FILER’S ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1 (i)(3) regarding signatures, Philip A. McLeod hereby attests 

that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:12-cv-06543-JCS Document 102 Filed 06/23/15 Page 3 of 4
- 4 - KYL_SF683757

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 

Case No. C 12-6543 JCS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE PARTIES’ JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT is approved as the Case 

Management Order for this case and all parties shall comply with its provisions. [In addition, the 

Court makes the further orders stated below:] 

 The Case Management Conference set for June 26, 2015 is continued to . 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________________________ 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 Aug. 28, 2015 at 

2:00 PM. 6/23/15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:12-cv-06543-JCS Document 102 Filed 06/23/15 Page 4 of 4