Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-00574/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-00574-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Reports

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COX & M OYER

703 M arket St., Ste 1800

San Francisco, CA 94103

________________________________________________________________

- 1 -

COX & MOYER

Scott J. Allen (State Bar #178925)

703 Market Street, Suite 1800

San Francisco, CA 94103

Tel: (415) 543-9464

Fax: (415) 777-1828

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

United States District Court for the

Eastern District of California

DELMAR CALLAWAY, DAVID DOYLE, JUDY

DOYLE, SHEILA GUERRA, MAYNARD

GAINES, ANTHONY PIERCY, LINDA PIERCY,

CHARLES YARBOROUGH, IMOGENE

ZANDER, FREDDIE McLAURIN, AND ARC

ECOLOGY,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR

FORCE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

DEFENSE, and DONALD RUMSFELD IN HIS

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE,

Defendants

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No: CIV. S-01-0574 MCE GGH

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF

DISMISSAL

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed their complaint in this case on April 9, 2001, which asserted

three causes of action.

WHEREAS, this Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ first and second causes of action in an order

dated September 6, 2001.

WHEREAS, on October 21, 2003, the Court issued a Memorandum and Order which

granted in part and denied in part a summary judgment motion filed by the Defendant and denied

a cross-motion for summary judgement filed by the Plaintiffs

Case 2:01-cv-00574-MCE -GGH Document 60 Filed 07/01/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COX & M OYER

703 M arket St., Ste 1800

San Francisco, CA 94103

________________________________________________________________

- 2 -

WHEREAS, the Plaintiff’s third cause of action remains before the Court.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the parties,

acting by and through the undersigned counsel of record, stipulate as follows:

1. The Plaintiffs’ Complaint, and each of the claims and causes of action asserted therein,

should be dismissed with prejudice.

2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs.

Dated June 29, 2005 COX & MOYER

By: /s/ 

SCOTT J. ALLEN

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

KELLY A. JOHNSON

Acting Assistant Attorney General

Environment and Natural Resources Division

Dated: June 29, 2005 /s/ 

BLAKE C. NIELSEN

United States Department of Justice

Environmental & Natural Resources Division

Environmental Defense Section

P.O. Box 23986

Washington, D.C. 20026-3986

(202) 514-1978

FAX (202) 514-8865

JOHN K. VINCENT

United States Attorney

YOSHINORI HIMEL

Assistant United States Attorney

Eastern District of California

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

(916) 554-2700

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:01-cv-00574-MCE -GGH Document 60 Filed 07/01/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COX & M OYER

703 M arket St., Ste 1800

San Francisco, CA 94103

________________________________________________________________

- 3 -

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this Court hereby orders as follows:

1. The Plaintiffs’ complaint, and all claims and causes of action asserted therein, is

hereby dismissed with prejudice.

2. The parties are to bear their own costs and attorneys fees incurred in this litigation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 1, 2005

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:01-cv-00574-MCE -GGH Document 60 Filed 07/01/05 Page 3 of 3