Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00387/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00387-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONTE WILSON, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00387 JLT

SCHEDULING ORDER 

(Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)

Pleading Amendment Deadline: 1/20/2017

Discovery Deadlines: 

Initial Disclosures: 10/6/2016

Non-Expert: 9/8/2017

Expert: 11/10/2017

Mid-Discovery Status Conference: 

6/19/2017, 8:30 a.m.

Non-dispositive Motion Deadlines:

 Filing: 11/3/2017

 Hearing: 12/1/2017

Dispositive Motion Deadline: 

Filing: 12/22/2017

Hearing: 1/19/2018

Settlement Conference:

2/27/2018 at 10:00 a.m., Courtroom 7

Pre-Trial Conference:

3/2/2018 at 8:30 a.m.

Trial: 4/16/2018 at 8:30 a.m., 

 Jury trial: 5-7 days

Case 1:16-cv-00387-JLT Document 33 Filed 09/13/16 Page 1 of 7
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I. Date of Scheduling Conference

September 13, 2016

II. Appearances of Counsel

John Kawai appeared on behalf of the plaintiff.

Heather Cohen appeared on behalf of the defendants.

III. Pleading Amendment Deadline

Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or 

motion to amend, no later than January 20, 2017.

IV. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Dates

The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 

26(a)(1) on or before October 6, 2016.

The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on September

8, 2017 and discovery pertaining to experts on or before November 10, 2017.

The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before September 

22, 2017, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before October 13, 2017. The written 

designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 

26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to 

designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or 

other evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to 

experts and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and 

opinions included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, 

which may include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement 

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced. 

A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for June 19, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. before the 

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, 

California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the 

Case 1:16-cv-00387-JLT Document 33 Filed 09/13/16 Page 2 of 7
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 

The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be 

completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in 

this order. Counsel may appear via CourtCall, providing a written notice of the intent to appear 

telephonically is provided to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk no later than five court 

days before the noticed hearing date.

V. Non-dispositive Motion Deadline

Any non-dispositive motions SHALL be filed no later than November 3, 2017, and heard no 

later than December 1, 2017. 

No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless 

it is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no 

written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. 

A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to 

resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party 

promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall 

be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To 

schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, 

Susan Hall, at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with 

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without 

prejudice and dropped from the Court’s calendar. 

In scheduling such motions, the Court may grant applications for an order shortening time 

pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the 

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251. Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive 

motions via CourtCall. 

VI. Dispositive Motion Deadlines

Dispositive motions SHALL be filed no later than December 22, 2017, and heard no later 

than January 19, 2018. Neither the motion nor the opposition SHALL exceed 30 pages, exclusive of 

evidence and evidentiary objections, unless the Court grants leave prior to the filing of the pertinent 

Case 1:16-cv-00387-JLT Document 33 Filed 09/13/16 Page 3 of 7
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

pleading; requests for leave after the filing will be disregarded and all pages over 30 pages will not be 

considered. 

The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed 

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement 

of undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be 

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint 

statement of undisputed facts. 

In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and 

conferred as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. 

Failure to comply may result in the motion being stricken.

VII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

March 2, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant 

to Local Rule 281(a)(2). The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial 

statement in Word format, directly to Judge Thurston’s chambers, by email at 

JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 

Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the 

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference. 

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in 

the Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by 

the Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

VIII. Trial Date

April 16, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Thurston at the United States Courthouse, 

located at 51019th Street, Bakersfield, CA.

A. This is a jury trial.

B. Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 5-7 days.

C. Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of 

California, Rule 285.

///

Case 1:16-cv-00387-JLT Document 33 Filed 09/13/16 Page 4 of 7
5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IX. Settlement Conference

A settlement conference is scheduled for February 27, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. at the Robert E. 

Coyle Federal Courthouse, located at 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA, courtroom 7, before the 

Honorable Sheila K. Oberto.

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall 

appear at the settlement conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority

to negotiate and settle the case on any terms1at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a 

serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the 

procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.

At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via 

fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful2settlement demand which includes a 

brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the 

settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or 

with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is 

appropriate. 

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their 

Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall 

not be filed on the court docket.

CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

Unless otherwise ordered by Judge Oberto, at least five court days before the settlement 

conference, the parties shall submit, directly to Judge Oberto’s chambers by e-mail to 

SKOorders@caed.uscourts.gov, a Confidential Settlement Conference Statement. The statement 

should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on any other party, although the parties 

 

1

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements 

are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a 

person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the 

process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the 

authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent 

demand.

2

“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering 

party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. 

Case 1:16-cv-00387-JLT Document 33 Filed 09/13/16 Page 5 of 7
6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference Statement. Each statement shall be clearly 

marked "confidential" with the date and time of the Settlement Conference indicated prominently

thereon. 

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

A. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

B. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which 

the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on 

the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

C. A summary of the proceedings to date.

D. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial. 

E. The relief sought.

F. The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of 

past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

X. Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other 

Techniques to Shorten Trial

The parties agree that the amount punitive damages, if any, may be bifurcated. They may raise 

other issues regarding trial phasing or bifurcation in their joint pre-trial statement.

XI. Related Matters Pending

There are no pending related matters.

XII. Compliance with Federal Procedure

All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast 

of any amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to 

efficiently handle its increasing caseload, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of 

California.

XIII. Effect of this Order

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda 

Case 1:16-cv-00387-JLT Document 33 Filed 09/13/16 Page 6 of 7
7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

most suitable to dispose of this case. The hearing dates are specifically reserved for this case. If 

the parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are 

ordered to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by 

stipulation or by subsequent status conference.

The dates set in this order are firm and will not be modified absent a showing of good 

cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations extending the 

deadlines contained will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or 

declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for 

granting the relief requested.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 13, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00387-JLT Document 33 Filed 09/13/16 Page 7 of 7