Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01410-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Keith Darnell Denegal is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has determined that this case will benefit from a 

settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman to 

conduct a settlement conference at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, 

California 95814 in Courtroom #25 on March 31, 2016 at 1:00 p.m.

A separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum will issue concurrently with this order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 

March 31, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, 

California 95814 in Courtroom #25.

///

///

KEITH DARNELL DENEGAL,

 Plaintiff,

v.

P.D. BRAZELTON,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01410-DAD-SAB (PC)

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT 

CONFERENCE

Case 1:14-cv-01410-DAD-SAB Document 27 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding 

settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person.

3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. The 

failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in person 

may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not proceed and 

will be reset to another date.

4. Judge Newman or another representative from the court will be contacting the parties either 

by telephone or in person, approximately one week prior to the settlement conference, to 

ascertain each party’s expectations of the settlement conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 1, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01410-DAD-SAB Document 27 Filed 02/02/16 Page 2 of 2