Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03557/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03557-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

 *E-FILED*

September 1, 2005

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DIRECTV, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

NAM NGUYEN,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 04-03557 RS

ORDER CONTINUING

STAND-BY ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE

Good cause appearing therefor,

The order to show cause hearing scheduled for September 7, 2005 is hereby continued to

September 28, 2005 at 9:30 a.m. The parties are required to file a stipulation of dismissal no later than

September 21, 2005. If a stipulation of dismissal is not filed by that date, the parties are ordered to

appear on September 28, 2005 at 9:30 a.m. and show cause why the case should not be dismissed.

Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 1, 2005

/s/ Richard Seeborg 

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States Magistrate Judge
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER WAS ELECTRONICALLY

PROVIDED TO:

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Sandeep J. Shah, Esq.

Email: sshah@buchalter.com 

AND A COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO:

Counsel for Defendant(s)

Tam Nguyen, Esq.

Tam Nguyen & Associates

545 East Saint John Street

San Jose, CA 95112

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for

e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Dated: September 1, 2005

 /s/ BAK 

Chambers of Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg