Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01655/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01655-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NASSER AZIMI,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ARLENE ACKERMAN et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-05-1655 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On June 16, 2005, plaintiff electronically filed a second amended complaint. Plaintiff

has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s standing orders, however, by failing to

deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that

the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name,

case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also

Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. The parties are hereby advised that if either party fails in the future to comply

with the Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Court may impose sanctions on the noncomplying party, including, but not limited to,

Case 3:05-cv-01655-MMC Document 15 Filed 06/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2005 

/s/ Maxine M. Chesney 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01655-MMC Document 15 Filed 06/20/05 Page 2 of 2