Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03947/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03947-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

C 06-397 CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

 CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K ERR ––––– & ––––– W AGSTAFFE

LLP

H. SINCLAIR KERR, JR. (61713) 

MICHAEL VON LOEWENFELDT (178665) 

ADRIAN J. SAWYER (203712) 

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 

100 Spear Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105–1528 

Telephone: (415) 371-8500 

Fax: (415) 371-0500 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC. 

GARY R. SELVIN (112030) 

SELVIN WRAITH HALMAN LLP 

500 12th Street, Suite 340 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Telephone: (510) 874-1811 

Fax: (510) 465-8976 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC. 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 06-3947 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING MARCH 16, 

2007 CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE IN LIGHT OF MARCH 

15, 2007, MEDIATION_

Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

Case 3:06-cv-03947-CRB Document 29 Filed 03/08/07 Page 1 of 3
C 06-3947 CRB - 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

 CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K ERR ––––– & ––––– W AGSTAFFE

LLP

WHEREAS, on December 15, 2006, the Court granted Plaintiff Electronics for Imaging, 

Inc.’s (“EFI”) motion for partial summary judgment, and denied Defendant Atlantic Mutual 

Insurance Co.’s (“Atlantic Mutual”) motion for summary judgment; 

WHEREAS, a previous case management conference in this matter had been scheduled 

for Friday, February 2, 2007; and 

WHEREAS, on January 30, 2007, the Court continued the case management conference 

to March 16, 2007, to allow time for the parties to mediate this dispute; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to mediate this dispute on March 15, 2007, before 

Hon. David A. Garcia (Ret.) at JAMS in San Francisco, and have confirmed that date with 

JAMS; 

WHEREAS, March 15, 2007,was the first available date for a mediation with a mutuallyacceptable mediator; 

WHEREAS, it would promote judicial economy to continue the case management 

conference until a date two weeks after the mediation: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT the case management conference currently 

scheduled for March 16, 2007 is continued to Friday, March 30, 2007, at 8:30 a.m. 

DATED: March 7, 2007 KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP

 By ______/s/________________________________ 

Michael von Loewenfeldt 

 Adrian J. Sawyer 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC. 

Case 3:06-cv-03947-CRB Document 29 Filed 03/08/07 Page 2 of 3
C 06-3947 CRB - 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

 CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K ERR ––––– & ––––– W AGSTAFFE

LLP

DATED: March 7, 2007 SELVIN WRAITH HALMAN LLP

 By ______/s/________________________________ 

Gary R. Selvin 

Patrick Quigley 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the case 

management conference currently scheduled for Friday, March 16, 2007, is continued to Friday, 

March 30, 2007, at 8:30 a.m. 

DATED: March __, 2007 

 _________________________________________ 

Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-03947-CRB Document 29 Filed 03/08/07 Page 3 of 3