Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05246/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05246-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES SINGH,

Plaintiff,

 v.

THE CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 03-05246 SI

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY

Now before the Court plaintiff’s motion to compel the deposition of T. Nguyen. Plaintiff first

noticed the deposition for September 15, 2005, but for a variety of reasons the deposition has not yet

taken place. Defendants do not oppose producing Nguyen for deposition. It therefore appears that the

only dispute between the parties is over the date of the deposition. The Court will not schedule

Nguyen’s deposition. The parties are instructed to meet and confer to find a mutually agreeable time

and place for the deposition. To ensure the deposition is held promptly, defendants must produce

Nguyen before September 8, 2006.

In its opposition, defendant states that “the City will assume that plaintiff does not intend to

produce documents or witnesses at trial.” In light of the record in this case, the Court observes that this

is a faulty assumption. Trial in this matter commences on September 25, 2006 and the Court expects

both sides to be ready for trial with witnesses and documents. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. (Docket # 105)

Dated: August 17, 2006 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:03-cv-05246-SI Document 108 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 1