Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03858/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03858-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

Case No.: 5:15-cv-03858-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

TIM ANDERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

TRANSUNION, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:15-cv-03858-EJD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On February 24, 2016, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff and Defendant Wells 

Fargo to, within ten days, meet and confer in an effort to reach an agreement on some form of 

alternative dispute resolution, and within that same timeframe file either a stipulation embodying 

their agreement or the form entitled “Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference.” Dkt. No. 57. 

As of the date and time this was order was filed, the parties have not complied and the time for 

compliance has expired.

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to appear before the Honorable Edward J. Davila on

March 17, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 1, 5th Floor, United States District Court, 280 S. 

First Street, San Jose, California, 95113, to show cause why the court should not impose any and 

all appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal of this action, on the parties, 

or any of them, for willful disobedience of a court order.

The parties may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions 

Case 5:15-cv-03858-EJD Document 59 Filed 03/08/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:15-cv-03858-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

should not be imposed on or before March 11, 2016. In doing so, however, they must (1) explain 

their failure to comply with the original deadline to file one of the ADR forms, and (2) must also 

file one of the forms contemplated by the February 24th Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 8, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-03858-EJD Document 59 Filed 03/08/16 Page 2 of 2