Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00269/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00269-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT C. BRUCE,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00269-AWI-SKO PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ORDER DENYINGPLAINTIFF’S MOTIONFOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Doc. 84)

Plaintiff Vincent C. Bruce (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 8, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations which

recommended that Plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. #84.) The

Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice to Plaintiff that any

objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date

on which the Findings and Recommendations were served. Plaintiff filed objections on October 25,

2010. (Doc. #91.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 305, this Court

has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

1

Case 1:07-cv-00269-BAM Document 94 Filed 12/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 

1. The September 8, 2010 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s August 27, 2010 motion requesting adequate law library access is

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 15, 2010 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2

Case 1:07-cv-00269-BAM Document 94 Filed 12/15/10 Page 2 of 2