Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06298/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06298-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND T. GRIMES,

Plaintiff, CV F 03 6298 REC WMW P

vs. ORDER 

NURSE SALZMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Raymond Grimes is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on August 11,

2003. The court has screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and finds that

it appears to state cognizable claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Lewis,

Austin, and Biggs for failing to protect him, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

SALZMAN, R.N.

DR. COPAT

MTA SHIPLEY

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff three (3) USM-285 forms, three (3)

Case 1:03-cv-06298-REC-WMW Document 13 Filed 05/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and

a copy of the complaint filed September 22, 2003.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to

the court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Four (4) copies of the endorsed complaint filed September 22, 2003.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2005 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06298-REC-WMW Document 13 Filed 05/10/05 Page 2 of 2