Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02080/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02080-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION RE EXPERT DISCLOSURES 1 Pino, et al. v. City of Sacramento, et al. 

Case No. 2:05-CV-02080 WBS DAD 

MATT GONZALEZ (SBN 153486) 

G. WHITNEY LEIGH (SBN 153457) 

BRYAN W. VERESCHAGIN (SBN 188608) 

J. ENRIQUE PEARCE (SBN 236228) 

GONZALEZ & LEIGH LLP 

Two Shaw Alley, 3rd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 512-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 512-2001 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

MARJORIE C. PINO, individually and 

as representative of Estate of Decedent 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

MARJORIE C. PINO, individually, and as joint 

personal representative of the Estate of Decedent 

RONNIE PINO, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

CITY OF SACRAMENTO; COUNTY OF 

SACRAMENTO; ALBERT NAJERA; LOU 

BLANAS; PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:05-CV-02080 WBS DAD 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES 

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 26 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between plaintiff Marjorie Pino, individually and as a 

personal representative of the Estate of decedent Ronnie Pino, by and though her attorney of 

record, Bryan W. Vereschagin of the law firm Gonzalez & Leigh, LLP, and defendants City of 

Sacramento and Albert Najera, by and through their counsel of record, James F. Wilson of the 

Sacramento City Attorney’s Office, and defendants County of Sacramento and Lou Blanas, by 

and through their attorney of record Van Longyear, of Longyear, O’Dea & Lavra, LLP, and 

defendant Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. dba Heritage Oaks Hospital, by and through its attorney of 

record Michael J. Baytosh of Porter, Scott, Weiberg & Delehant, that the last day for all parties 

to serve expert disclosures under Rule 26 shall be January 31, 2007. This joint stipulation is 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-02080-WBS-DAD Document 74 Filed 01/23/07 Page 1 of 3
 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION RE EXPERT DISCLOSURES 2 Pino, et al. v. City of Sacramento, et al. 

Case No. 2:05-CV-02080 WBS DAD 

entered into pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: January 18, 2007 GONZALEZ & LEIGH, LLP 

By ___/s/_______________________________

BRYAN W. VERESCHAGIN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MARJORIE PINO 

Dated: January 18, 2007 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP 

By /s/ ___________ 

VAN LONGYEAR 

Attorneys for defendants the County of 

Sacramento and Lou Blanas 

Dated: January 18, 2007 SACRAMENTO CITY ATTORNEY’S 

OFFICE 

By /s/ ____________ 

JAMES F. WILSON 

Attorneys for defendants the City of 

Sacramento and Albert Najera 

Dated: January 18, 2007 PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & 

DELEHANT 

By /s/ __________ 

MICHAEL J. BAYTOSH 

Attorneys for defendants Psychiatric 

Solutions dba Heritage Oaks Hospital 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-02080-WBS-DAD Document 74 Filed 01/23/07 Page 2 of 3
 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION RE EXPERT DISCLOSURES 3 Pino, et al. v. City of Sacramento, et al. 

Case No. 2:05-CV-02080 WBS DAD 

PURSUANT TO THE JOINT STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: January 22, 2007 

 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-02080-WBS-DAD Document 74 Filed 01/23/07 Page 3 of 3