Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01126/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01126-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIMBERLY R. OLSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1126 DFL CMK 

vs.

DARREL LEMOS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Pursuant to the court’s order, plaintiff filed an amended complaint on November

14, 2006. Prior to the court screening the amended complaint, defendants filed a responsive

pleading in the form of a motion to dismiss. The court has now screened the amended complaint

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and filed findings and recommendations recommending that

some of plaintiff’s claims in her amended complaint be dismissed. Accordingly, the motion to

dismiss was filed prematurely and will be denied as moot. 

Following the District Judge’s ruling on the findings and recommendations, the

court will make appropriate arrangements for defendants to file a responsive pleading. 

///

///

///

Case 2:06-cv-01126-TLN-CMK Document 29 Filed 04/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

IT IS ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 19) be denied, without

prejudice, as moot. 

DATED: April 19, 2007.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01126-TLN-CMK Document 29 Filed 04/19/07 Page 2 of 2