Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_97-cv-00152/USCOURTS-caed-2_97-cv-00152-52/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LANCE IAN OSBAND,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-97-0152 WBS KJM

vs. DEATH PENALTY CASE

JOHN STOKES, 

 Acting Warden of San Quentin 

 State Prison, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

On October 24, 2007 the undersigned held a status conference in this matter. Tim

Schardl appeared and Tim Brosnan participated telephonically for petitioner. Ward Campbell

and Stephanie Mitchell appeared for respondent. After discussion with counsel, and good cause

appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. With regard to the missing portion of the evidentiary hearing transcript for

May 2, 2007, because the parties were not successful in recovering data from the court reporter’s

hard drive the court has taken responsibility for the hard drive. The court will pursue other

avenues for recovering the data and will inform the parties of any progress. As it remains

possible the data is unrecoverable, the parties are directed to preserve all written and electronic

notes taken during the May 2 hearing. 

/////

Case 2:97-cv-00152-KJM-CSK Document 454 Filed 10/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Since the transcript of the morning of the April 23, 2007 hearing is now

available, the parties shall inform the court within fourteen days of the filed date of this order

whether that transcript contains any material errors.

3. The parties shall meet and confer regarding all errors in the existing transcript

that they feel are sufficiently important to bring to the court’s attention. Respondent informed

the court that all errors he finds important are described in his October 4, 2007 filing. Within

twenty-one days of the filed date of this order, the parties shall file a joint statement describing

all stipulated transcription errors and any disputed errors. 

4. Petitioner requests an extension of the briefing schedule set out in the court’s

October 22, 2007 order. Good cause appearing, and without opposition from respondent,

petitioner’s request is granted. Petitioner shall file the statement described in paragraph 1 of the

October 22 order within forty days of the filed date of that order. 

DATED: October 24, 2007.

osbandsts.or

Case 2:97-cv-00152-KJM-CSK Document 454 Filed 10/25/07 Page 2 of 2