Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07329/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07329-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7329

TYRONE LAMAR ROBERSON,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden Lee Corrections Institution; 

LIEUTENANT A. DAVIS; MS. FULTON, Medical Health Care 

Provider RN; RN MS. JUDY RABON; RN MS. MCDONALD; J. MCREE, 

MD, KCI Pharmacy; JUANITA MOSS, Food Service Supervisor; 

MS. BELL, Food Service Supervisor; MS. NORMAN, Food Service 

Supervisor; MS. ANDERSON, Food Service Supervisor,

 Defendants – Appellees,

and

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MAJOR JAMES DEAN; 

LIEUTENANT ERNEST MIMS; SERGEANT B. COOK; SERGEANT K. 

ARENS; MS. KELA E. THOMAS, Commission of Probation Parole 

and Pardon Services Director; WILLIAM BYARS, JR., SCDC 

Director, et al; SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BUDGET AND CONTROL 

BOARD COMMITTEE; WILLIAM F. MARSCHER, III, SC Commission on 

Indigent Defense; FREDERICK M. CORLEY, Esquire; RANDOLPH 

MURDAUGH, III, Solicitor Attorney for the State; WILLIAM T. 

HOWELL, Judge of the 14th Judicial Circuit Court of SC,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (2:13-cv-01872-RMG)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Appeal: 15-7329 Doc: 22 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Lamar Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parker McLean, 

CLARKE, JOHNSON, PETERSON & MCLEAN, PA, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7329 Doc: 22 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lamar Roberson appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge 

and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Roberson v. Padula, No. 2:13-cv-01872-RMG (D.S.C. 

July 22, 2015). In addition, we decline to address claims 

raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 

1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-7329 Doc: 22 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 3 of 3