Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02678/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02678-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTHONY RAUL BARRON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

A. ALCARAZ, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:11-cv-2678 JAM AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff Barron is a former state prisoner pursuing this civil rights action against sole 

defendant Correctional Officer Whitfield. On September 16, 2016, plaintiff notified the court that 

he was released from prison and resides in San Jose, California. Currently pending is defendant 

Whitfield’s request that this action now proceed without application of Local Rule 230(l) which, 

inter alia, provides that motions in prisoner cases shall be decided on the papers without oral 

argument. Defendant seeks to schedule an oral argument before this court on his anticipated 

motion for summary judgment. 

For good cause shown, the court will grant defendant’s request. If plaintiff would have 

difficulty appearing in person for oral argument, he may, after defendant notices a date for 

hearing, request to appear telephonically by contacting the undersigned’s Courtroom Deputy 

Clerk, Valerie Callen, at 916-930-4199. 

//// 

Case 2:11-cv-02678-JAM-AC Document 100 Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s request this action proceed 

without application of Local Rule 230(l), ECF No. 99, is granted. The parties shall notice, file, 

serve and brief their dispositive motions in accordance with the deadlines and requirements set 

forth in Local Rule 230(b)-(h). The parties are informed that an unexcused failure to appear at a 

scheduled hearing, either in person or telephonically if permission has been granted, “may be 

deemed withdrawal of the motion or of opposition to the motion, in the discretion of the Court, or 

may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Local Rule 230(i). 

DATED: November 28, 2016 

Case 2:11-cv-02678-JAM-AC Document 100 Filed 11/29/16 Page 2 of 2