Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03555/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03555-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

Stipulated Motion for Admin. Relief 

CASE NO. CV 14 3555 CRB

1 n:\labor\li2014\150237\00986242.doc

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

ELIZABETH S. SALVESON, State Bar #83788

Chief Labor Attorney 

ERIK A. RAPOPORT, State Bar #187059 

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 5th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3950 

Facsimile: (415) 554-4248 

E-Mail: erik.rapoport@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

RACHEL LANGSTON, State Bar #257950

LEGAL AID SOCIETY 

EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 

180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

KUIANA TAYLOR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KUIANA TAYLOR, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. CV 14 3555 CRB 

STIPULATED MOTION FOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF; AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING PARTIES 

TO FILE DISCOVERY LETTER REGARDING 

PRODUCTION OF CITY DOCUMENTS AND 

IDENTIFICATION OF CITY EMPLOYEES 

RECEIVING PUBLIC ASSISTANCE

Civ. Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12 

Plaintiff Kuiana Taylor and Defendant City and County of San Francisco (collectively, “the 

parties”) hereby move this Court for an order allowing the parties to file a letter brief setting forth the 

parties' respective positions regarding the production of City documents and identification of City 

employees in the City’s Jobs Now program, the job program in which Plaintiff participated. In order 

to qualify for the Jobs Now program, individuals must have received public assistance in the past. It is 

Case 3:14-cv-03555-CRB Document 32 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 3
Stipulated Motion for Admin. Relief 

CASE NO. CV 14 3555 CRB

2 n:\labor\li2014\150237\00986242.doc

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the City’s position that information identifying employees who are receiving public assistance is 

protected by California Welfare and Institutions Code section 10850 which makes the disclosure of 

such information a misdemeanor under California law. It is Plaintiff’s position that this information is 

highly relevant and necessary for Plaintiff to litigate her discrimination and harassment claims against 

the City because a number of these individuals were witnesses to Plaintiff’s alleged harassment and/or 

alleged similar claims of harassment against Plaintiff’s supervisor. 

The Parties hereby make this Stipulated Motion for Administrative Relief in order to timely 

resolve this discovery dispute so that documents can be produced and an initial round of depositions 

can occur before the Court ordered mediation, currently set for May 20, 2015, takes place. Waiting 35 

days to resolve this dispute through formal motion procedures would needlessly delay the process and 

possibly prevent the parties from adequately preparing for the mediation. Moreover, filing a single 

letter outlining the parties respective positions will reduce the attorney time spent resolving this 

dispute. 

Dated: January 28, 2015 LEGAL AID SOCIETY 

By: /s/Rachael Langston .

RACHAEL LANGSTON 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

KUIANA TAYLOR 

dated: January 28, 2015 DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

ELIZABETH SALVESON 

Chief Labor Attorney 

ERIK A. RAPOPORT 

Deputy City Attorney 

By: /s/Erik A. Rapoport .

ERIK A. RAPOPORT 

Attorney for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

Case 3:14-cv-03555-CRB Document 32 Filed 02/03/15 Page 2 of 3
Stipulated Motion for Admin. Relief 

CASE NO. CV 14 3555 CRB

3 n:\labor\li2014\150237\00986242.doc

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[Proposed] ORDER 

The Court has reviewed the Parties Stipulated Motion for Administrative Relief. Good cause 

appearing, and PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED – The Parties may file a single 

letter outlining their respective positions regarding the City’s production of documents and 

identification of City employees receiving public assistance. 

Dated: ________________ ________________________ 

 CHARLES R. BREYER 

 United States District Judge

February 3, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:14-cv-03555-CRB Document 32 Filed 02/03/15 Page 3 of 3