Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00903/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00903-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

tanya@moorelawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Cecil Shaw 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CECIL SHAW,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ROCHELLE K. SARGENTINI, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:14-cv-00903-LJO-GSA

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; ORDER

Supporting Declaration of Tanya E. Moore 

filed concurrently herewith

AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIM.

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff, Cecil Shaw (“Plaintiff”), hereby requests that his Complaint in the abovecaptioned action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure. Plaintiff does not request dismissal of the Cross-Claim filed in the action (Dkt. 

21).

Plaintiff asked that the last two remaining Defendants in this action, Rochelle K. 

Sargentini and Norman Dean Kato dba Bob’s Market (collectively “Defendants”), stipulate to 

the dismissal of his Complaint pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. On March 30, 2015, counsel for Defendants indicated that he approved the language 

of the stipulation, but asked that it not be filed at that time, apparently because he was still 

Case 1:14-cv-00903-LJO-EPG Document 30 Filed 05/21/15 Page 1 of 2
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

trying to resolve the cross-claim. Declaration of Tanya E. Moore, filed herewith (“Moore 

Decl.”), ¶ 2. Plaintiff’s counsel’s office thereafter advised Defendants’ counsel that if he did not 

authorize the filing of the stipulation by May 8, 2015, Plaintiff would proceed to ask that the 

Court enter an order dismissing his Complaint. Moore Decl., ¶ 3. Defendants’ counsel has not 

authorized the filing of the stipulation to date. Moore Decl., ¶ 4.

Plaintiff requests this dismissal on the grounds that a settlement agreement was entered 

into between Plaintiff and Defendants, and under the terms of that agreement, Plaintiff agreed 

to dismiss his Complaint once Defendants had made the payments required under the 

agreement. Moore Decl., ¶ 5. Defendants have made the first of such payments, and therefore, 

Plaintiff seeks to dismiss his Complaint as required.

For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court dismiss his 

Complaint filed in this action.

Date: May 20, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Cecil Shaw

ORDER

Upon request of Plaintiff and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint filed in this action be dismissed 

with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: May 20, 2015

 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

 United States District Judge

Case 1:14-cv-00903-LJO-EPG Document 30 Filed 05/21/15 Page 2 of 2