Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-05865/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-05865-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

VISA'S ADMIN. REQUEST & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

CASE NO. C03-05865 SBA

ROBERT T. HASLAM (Bar No. 71134) 

STANLEY YOUNG (Bar. No. 121180) 

CHRISTINE SAUNDERS HASKETT (Bar No. 188053) 

MICHAEL M. MARKMAN (Bar No. 191388) 

AARON S. JACOBS (Bar No. 214953) 

NISHITA A. DOSHI (Bar No. 235129) 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP

275 Middlefield Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-3506 

Telephone: (650) 324-7000 

Facsimile: (650) 324-0638 

nishi.doshi@hellerehrman.com 

JOHNNY A. KUMAR (Pro Hac Vice) 

ROBERT M. HANSEN (Pro Hac Vice) 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP

1717 Rhode Island Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20036 

Telephone: (202) 912-2000 

Facsimile: (202) 912-2020 

Attorneys for Defendants 

VISA U.S.A. INC. and 

VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION

SAFECLICK, LLC, an Iowa 

limited liability company, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

VISA U.S.A. INC., a Delaware corporation, and 

VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE 

ASSOCIATION, a Delaware Corporation, 

Defendants. 

Case No.: C03-05865 SBA

DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE 

REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS 

UNDER SEAL AND 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

REQUEST PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 

79-5(B) 

Judge: Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong 

Dept.: Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor 

Date: Sept. 20, 2005 

Time: 1:00 p.m. 

Case 4:03-cv-05865-SBA Document 139 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

 

VISA'S ADMIN. REQUEST & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

CASE NO. C03-05865 SBA

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(b), Defendants Visa International Service Association 

and Visa U.S.A. Inc. (collectively “Visa”) hereby request to file certain documents under seal: 

• Pages 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 24 of Defendants Visa International Service Association and 

Visa U.S.A. Inc.'s Reply for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement; (“Visa's Reply 

Brief.”); 

• Exhibit A to the Reply Declaration of Michael M. Markman in Support of Defendants Visa 

International Service Association and Visa U.S.A. Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of 

Non-Infringement (“Reply Markman Decl.”); 

• Exhibit G to the Declaration of Michael M. Markman in Support of Defendants Visa 

International Service Association and Visa U.S.A. Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of 

Non-Infringement; 

• Exhibit H to the Declaration of Michael M. Markman in Support of Defendants Visa 

International Service Association and Visa U.S.A. Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of 

Non-Infringement; 

• Exhibit I to the Declaration of Michael M. Markman in Support of Defendants Visa 

International Service Association and Visa U.S.A. Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of 

Non-Infringement. 

Visa's Reply Brief cites confidential, technical information and deposition transcript 

excerpts from the Declaration of Mr. Markman, Esq. 

Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit A contains confidential excerpts from the Dr. Gene Tsudik 

Deposition, Plaintiff Safeclick LLC (“Safeclick”) technical expert, of August 16, 2005. Pursuant to 

Paragraph 6 of the Stipulated Protective Order of October 4, 2004, this deposition is considered 

confidential for thirty (30) days. 

Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit G contains confidential, technical information from the Carl 

S. Wagener Deposition, co-inventor of U.S. Patent No. 5,793,028 and the patent-in-suit ,of August 

Case 4:03-cv-05865-SBA Document 139 Filed 09/02/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

 

VISA'S ADMIN. REQUEST & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

CASE NO. C03-05865 SBA

2

24, 2005. Pursuant to Paragraph 6 of the Stipulated Protective Order of October 4, 2004, this 

deposition is considered confidential for thirty (30) days. 

Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit H contains confidential, technical information from the 

James Reno Deposition, from third party 30(b)(6) designee Arcot ,of August 19, 2005. These 

excerpts contain confidential, technical third party information and Visa confidential, technical 

information regarding Verified by Visa. Pursuant to Paragraph 6 of the Stipulated Protective Order 

of October 4, 2004, this deposition is considered confidential for thirty (30) days. 

Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit I contains confidential excerpts from the Dr. Michael I. 

Shamos Deposition, Visa's technical expert, of July 25, 2005. These excerpts contain confidential 

and technical Visa information regarding Verified by Visa. Pursuant to Paragraph 6 of the 

Stipulated Protective Order of October 4, 2004, this deposition is considered confidential for thirty 

(30) days. 

These documents are properly filed under seal because Visa and Safeclick have designated 

them as “Confidential Information,” pursuant to Paragraphs 1, 5 and 6 of the Stipulated Protective 

Order entered in this case by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on October 4, 2004. 

Visa submitted “public versions” of Visa's Reply Brief, Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit A; 

Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit G; Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit H; Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit 

I; as well as a confidential versions of the Visa's Reply Brief, Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit A; 

Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit G; Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit H; and Reply Markman Decl., 

Exhibit I under seal. 

Furthermore, the Court finds that the “public versions” of Visa's Reply Brief, Reply 

Markman Decl., Exhibit A; Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit G; Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit H; 

Reply Markman Decl., Exhibit I properly exclude only that information which is confidential and 

protected from disclosure by the Stipulated Protective Order. Accordingly, the Court finds that 

good cause exists to file: 

Case 4:03-cv-05865-SBA Document 139 Filed 09/02/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

 

VISA'S ADMIN. REQUEST & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

CASE NO. C03-05865 SBA

3

• Pages 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 24 of Defendants Visa International Service Association and 

Visa U.S.A. Inc.'s Reply for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement; (“Visa's Reply 

Brief.”); 

• Exhibit A to the Reply Declaration of Michael M. Markman in Support of Defendants Visa 

International Service Association and Visa U.S.A. Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of 

Non-Infringement (“Reply Markman Decl.”); 

• Exhibit G to the Declaration of Michael M. Markman in Support of Defendants Visa 

International Service Association and Visa U.S.A. Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of 

Non-Infringement; 

• Exhibit H to the Declaration of Michael M. Markman in Support of Defendants Visa 

International Service Association and Visa U.S.A. Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of 

Non-Infringement; 

• Exhibit I to the Declaration of Michael M. Markman in Support of Defendants Visa 

International Service Association and Visa U.S.A. Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of 

Non-Infringement. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-listed documents shall be filed under seal. 

Dated: September 2, 2005 

The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong 

United States District Judge 

For the Northern District of California 

Case 4:03-cv-05865-SBA Document 139 Filed 09/02/05 Page 4 of 4