Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01785/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01785-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EARL L. RILEY III,

Plaintiff,

v.

ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:21-cv-01785-JLT-HBK

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(Doc. No. 2)

Plaintiff proceeds in this civil action pro se. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff moves to proceed in 

forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. No. 2). Plaintiff’s declarations in the motion 

satisfies the requirements under § 1915. The court will screen plaintiff’s complaint in due course 

before ordering service.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is GRANTED.

Dated: January 25, 2022 

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:21-cv-01785-JLT-HBK Document 4 Filed 01/25/22 Page 1 of 1