Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05773/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05773-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GERALD L. TUCKER, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

STUART J. RYAN, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:04-cv-05773-REC-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 37)

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO WITHDRAW THE

UNEXHAUSTED PORTIONS OF THE

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 36)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On June 24, 2005, Petitioner filed a motion for leave to withdraw portions of unexhausted

claims in the instant petition. (Doc. 36). On June 29, 2005, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the

case filed a Report and Recommendation recommending that Petitioner request be granted and

that the specified portions of the petition’s claims be dismissed. (Doc. 37). This Report and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not

filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.

///

Case 1:04-cv-05773-LJO-TAG Document 38 Filed 08/03/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed June 29, 2005 (Doc. 37), is ADOPTED

IN FULL; and,

2. Petitioner’s motion for leave to withdraw the unexhausted portions of claims in

the instant petition (Doc. 36), is hereby GRANTED.

The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 3, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05773-LJO-TAG Document 38 Filed 08/03/05 Page 2 of 2