Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01811/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01811-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 20:1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

RODERICK L. MacKENZIE SBN 85806

MacKENZIE & BRODY

1107 Second Street, Suite 330

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 448-6436

Facsimile: (916) 446-3433

Attorney for Plaintiffs: WALTER and DRUSCILLA COVINGTON, as parents and

 Guardians ad litem of student WAID COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WALTER COVINGTON, DRUSCILLA ) CASE NO.: 2:07-CV-01811-MCE-KJM

COVINGTON, as parents and )

Guardians ad litem of student WAID ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR LEAVE

COVINGTON, ) OF COURT TO FILE CROSS SUMMARY

Plaintiffs, ) JUDGMENT BRIEFS AND PROPOSED

vs. ) BRIEFING SCHEDULE

)

YUBA CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL )

DISTRICT, )

)

Defendant. )

________________________________)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their

respective attorneys of record as follows:

1. That the parties are mutually desirous of reaching a stipulated briefing

schedule with respect to the filing cross-motions for summary judgment that the parties wish

to file in this case and to which process the court has previously consented;

2. That the parties are requesting leave of the court to issue a briefing and

motion filing schedule pursuant to this stipulation, subject to the court’s approval;

3. That both parties have schedule conflicts such that they are requesting the

proposed briefing schedule;

4. That both parties are agreeable to initial filing of motions for summary

judgment during the last two weeks of September, 2010 (September 13 to October 1, 2010,

Case 2:07-cv-01811-MCE -KJN Document 43 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

withe the dates for filing responsive papers and documents and the setting of the hearing

on the motions as per local rule of court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 28, 2010 ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO

By: /s/ Peter W. Sturges 

PETER STURGES, Attorney for Defendant

Dated: June 28, 2010 MacKENZIE & BRODY

By:__/s/ Roderick L. MacKenzie_______________

RODERICK L. MacKENZIE, Attorney for

Plaintiff

ORDER

 Leave of Court is granted to allow the parties to proceed by way of cross motions for

summary judgment. Parties initial filing of motions for summary judgment and crossmotions for summary judgment shall occur no later than October 1, 2010. All other

opposition and reply briefs shall be filed pursuant to local rule of court. The remainder of

the court’s scheduling order shall remain in full force and effect. Any objections to said

scheduling order must be filed not more than seven (7) days after this Order is electronically

filed or all objections will be waived.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 12, 2010

______________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-01811-MCE -KJN Document 43 Filed 07/13/10 Page 2 of 2