Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00966/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00966-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1355 Petition for Return of Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. 1

Case Number 10-CV-00966 JF (PVT)

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT EXERGEN CORPORATION

(JFLC1)

**E-Filed 7/22/2010**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY, Inc.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

THE GLAD PRODUCTS COMPANY, BAJER

DESIGN & MARKETING INC., BAYER

CORPORATION, BRIGHT IMAGE

CORPORATION, CHURCH & DWIGHT CO.

INC., COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY,

COMBE INCORPORATED, THE DIAL

CORPORATION, EXERGEN CORPORATION,

GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HI-TECH

PHARMACAL CO. INC., JOHNSON PRODUCTS

COMPANY INC., MAYBELLINE LLC, MCNEILPPC INC., MEDTECH PRODUCTS INC.,

PLAYTEX PRODUCTS INC., RECKITT

BENCKISER INC., ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS

CORPORATION, SOFTSHEEN-CARSON LLC,

SUN PRODUCTS CORPORATION, SUNSTAR

AMERICAS INC.,

 Defendants.

Case Number 10-CV-00966 JF (PVT)

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT

EXERGEN CORPORATION1

Case 5:10-cv-00966-JF Document 317 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case Number 10-CV-00966 JF (PVT)

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT EXERGEN CORPORATION

(JFLC1)

Defendant Exergen Corporation’s motion to dismiss having been granted and pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff shall take nothing and

that the action against Exergen be dismissed on the merits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 7/22/2010

____________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00966-JF Document 317 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 2