Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00157/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00157-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0157 MCE EFB P

vs.

SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,

Defendants ORDER

 /

On June 8, 2009, plaintiff filed “objections” to the magistrate judge’s order filed

May 29, 2009, denying plaintiff’s requests for the appointment of counsel. The court construes

plaintiff’s “objections” as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order. Pursuant

to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed May 29, 2009, is affirmed. 

Dated: September 25, 2009

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00157-MCE-EFB Document 142 Filed 09/28/09 Page 1 of 1