Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-01598/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-01598-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

William Carl Jack, Jr.,

 Petitioner,

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

 Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-15-01598-PHX-PGR (MHB)

 ORDER

 

 

Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Burns notwithstanding that no party has filed any objection to the Report and

Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly determined

that the petitioner’s habeas petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, should be

dismissed with prejudice because the petitioner did not exhaust any of the claims

raised in his habeas petition and he has not demonstrated either cause or prejudice

to excuse his procedural default, and he has not shown any fundamental

miscarriage of justice, and he has not raised a Martinez claim. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(Doc. 17) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. §

Case 2:15-cv-01598-PGR Document 18 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

- 2 -

2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is denied and is

dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue and

that leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied because dismissal of the habeas

petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the

procedural ruling debatable.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment

accordingly. 

DATED this 16th day of August, 2016.

Case 2:15-cv-01598-PGR Document 18 Filed 08/16/16 Page 2 of 2