Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01024/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01024-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Covenant Aviation Security LLC’s Responsive Pleading

Case No: 3:16-cv-01024-JST

Richard G. Grotch, Esq. – SBN 127713

Gina J. Beltramo, Esq. – SBN 203809

Jonathan C. Harriman, Esq. – SBN 250943

CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH

A Professional Corporation, Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300

Redwood City, CA 94065-2133

Telephone: 650.592.5400

Facsimile: 650.592.5027

ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant

Covenant Aviation Security, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Sai, on Plaintiff’s own behalf, and on behalf of 

all those similarly situated,

 

 Plaintiff,

vs.

David Smith; Jim Adams; Champagne Ellison; 

Covenant Aviation Security (CAS); et al., 

 Defendants.

Case No. CV 16-1024 JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT COVENANT AVIATION 

SECURITY, LLC TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR 

OTHERWISE RESPOND 

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, pro se or through counsel 

of record, that the time for Covenant Aviation Security, LLC, to answer, move or otherwise 

respond to the operative complaint shall be extended to and including the same date on which 

the Federal Defendants’ answer, motion or other response to the operative complaint, must be 

filed. 

SO STIPULATED.

/s/ Sai

Dated: July 24, 2017

By:

Sai

Plaintiff pro se

Case 3:16-cv-01024-JST Document 106 Filed 07/25/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Covenant Aviation Security LLC’s Responsive Pleading

Case No: 3:16-cv-01024-JST

Dated: July 24, 2017 BRIAN J. STRETCH

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Wendy Garbers By:

Wendy Garbers

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants United States of 

America; Department of Homeland Security; 

and Transportation Security Administration

Dated: July 24, 2017 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH

/s/ Richard G. Grotch

By:

Richard G. Grotch(*)

Attorneys for Defendant 

Covenant Aviation Security

(*) I hereby attest that I have on file all 

holographic signatures corresponding to 

any signatures indicated by a conformed

signature (/s/) within this e-filed

document or that I have been expressly

authorized by the signatory to apply

the conformed signature.

ORDER

Upon the parties’ stipulation, the time for Covenant to answer, move or otherwise 

respond shall be extended to and including the same date on which the Federal Defendants’ 

answer, motion or other response to the operative complaint must be filed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July __ 2017 ___________________________

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge

25

Case 3:16-cv-01024-JST Document 106 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 2