Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-01999/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-01999-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11293.0726/15102961.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE CLAIMS ALLEGED BY 

PLAINTIFF AGAINST DITECH

MARY KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203)

ELEANOR M. ROMAN (State Bar No. 178736)

emr@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-3344

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439

Attorneys for Defendant

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUZANNE RYAN-BEEDY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON fka 

THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE 

FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFICATE 

HOLDERS OF THE CWALT, INC., 

ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2004-25CB, 

MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-25CB; 

DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC; and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:17-CV-01999-WBS-EFB

ORDER ON STIPULATION DISMISSING 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE CLAIMS 

ALLEGED BY PLAINTIFF AGAINST 

DITECH

Action Filed: September 27, 2017

Pursuant to the Stipulation of Plaintiff, Suzanne Ryan-Beedy, (“Ryan-Beedy” or 

“Plaintiff”) and defendant, Ditech Financial LLC, (“Ditech” or “Defendant”), by and through their 

counsel of record, and their request made pursuant to Local Rule 143 and Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(2), and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the remaining claims for relief alleged 

against Ditech by Plaintiff in the First Amended Complaint filed by her in this Action:(1) Fourth 

Claim for Relief for Intentional Misrepresentation/False Promise; (2) Fifth Claim for Relief for 

Negligent Misrepresentation; (3) Sixth Claim for Relief for Promissory Estoppel; (4) Seventh 

Claim for Relief for Negligence; (5) Eighth Claim for Relief for Wrongful Foreclosure; (6) Ninth 

Case 2:17-cv-01999-WBS-JDP Document 61 Filed 02/21/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11293.0726/15102961.1 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE CLAIMS ALLEGED BY 

PLAINTIFF AGAINST DITECH

Claim for Relief for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; and (7) Tenth Claim for Relief 

for Violation of Business and Professions Code § 17200 are hereby dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 20, 2020

Case 2:17-cv-01999-WBS-JDP Document 61 Filed 02/21/20 Page 2 of 2