Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00116/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00116-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO SC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

David Torrez, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Corrections Corp. of America, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 10-0116-PHX-MHM (MHB)

ORDER

Plaintiff David Torrez filed a First Amended Complaint in this action, which the Court

recently dismissed with leave to amend. (Doc.# 8, 18.) The Court dismissed the First

Amended Complaint because Plaintiff failed to comply with the Instructions for completing

the court-approved form complaint to be used by inmates and included third-party claims.

(Doc.# 18 at 3-5.) Plaintiff has filed an “Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order;

Preliminary Injunction.” (Doc.# 17.) The Court will deny that motion.

The standard for a temporary restraining order (TRO) is the same as that to obtain a

preliminary injunction. See Applied Filter Tech. v. Wetzel, No. C09-1040JLR, 2009 WL

2424802 at * 3 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 5, 2009) (citing Stuhlbarg Int’l Sales Co. v. John D. Brush

& Co., Inc., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n. 7 (9th Cir. 2001)); see also Highway Tech., Inc. v. Porter,

No. CV09-1305-DGC, 2009 WL 1835114 at *1 (D. Ariz. June 26, 2009) (applying Winter

standard to a motion for TRO). To obtain a preliminary injunction, the moving party must

show “that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm

in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an

injunction is in the public interest.” Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 129 S. Ct.

Case 2:10-cv-00116-JWS Document 21 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

365, 374 (2008); Am. Trucking Assoc., Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 559 F.3d 1046, 1052

(9th Cir. 2009). The moving party has the burden of proof on each element of the test.

Environmental Council of Sacramento v. Slater, 184 F. Supp. 2d 1016, 1027 (E.D. Cal.

2000). “No preliminary injunction shall be issued without notice to the adverse party.”

Fed.R.Civ. P. 65(a)(1). Further, a temporary restraining order without notice may be granted

only if the applicant certifies to the court in writing the efforts, if any, that he made to give

notice and the reasons that notice should not be required. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b).

In the motion, Plaintiff alleges that he is now being prevented from preparing legal

documents on a prison computer that is apparently otherwise available for use by inmates in

retaliation for filing this case. Plaintiff has not certified in writing the efforts he made, if any,

to give notice to Defendants or reasons why notice should not be required. Moreover, as

discussed above, Plaintiff failed to comply with the Instructions for completing the

court-approved form complaint and asserted claims on behalf of third parties. Under the

circumstances, the Court will deny the motion without prejudice to filing a new motion after

Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint in compliance with the last Order. 

Warnings

A. Release

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.

Also, within days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay the

balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result in

dismissal of this action.

B. Address Changes

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

action.

///

Case 2:10-cv-00116-JWS Document 21 Filed 06/09/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

C. Copies

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice

to Plaintiff.

D. Possible Dismissal

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at

1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the

Court).

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order

or Preliminary Injunction is denied. (Doc.# 17.) 

DATED this 6th day of June, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-00116-JWS Document 21 Filed 06/09/10 Page 3 of 3