Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01985/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01985-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

STIPULATION REQUESTING REVISION IN BRIEFING 1 U.S. DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. C05-01985 JSW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MARK L. MOSLEY (SBN 136449) 

BRIAN GEARINGER (SBN 146125) 

MOSLEY & GEARINGER LLP

825 Van Ness Avenue, Fourth Floor 

San Francisco, California 94109-7837 

Telephone: (415) 440-3102 

Facsimile: (415) 440-3103 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MASUO YOSHIMOTO and M2M, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT R. CREAGER, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

MASUO YOSHIMOTO, an individual, M.P. 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a corporation, and 

M2M, INC., a corporation, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 05-01985 JSW 

STIPULATION REQUESTING 

REVISION IN BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFS ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION 

TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO THE 

DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON 

CONVENIENS; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Honorable Jeffrey S. White, Presiding 

Counsel for Defendants Masuo Yoshimoto and M2M, Inc.; for Defendant M.P. 

Technologies, Inc.; and for Plaintiff Robert R. Creager, in support of their Stipulation Requesting 

Revisions in Briefing Schedule Regarding Supplemental Briefs on Defendants' Motions to 

Dismiss Pursuant to the Doctrine of Forum non Conveniens, state as follows: 

1. At the December 16, 2005 Case Management Conference, the Court set a 

Supplemental Briefing Schedule as follows: Opening briefs to be filed by all parties on February 

17, 2006 and responsive briefs to be filed by March 3, 2006. The Court set the hearing on the 

motion for March 17, 2006. 

2. On December 16, 2006, the Court issued a Civil Minute Order that provided in 

pertinent part: "Response due: 3-13-06." 

/ / / 

SCHEDULE REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS 

Case 3:05-cv-01985-JSW Document 58 Filed 02/23/2006 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:05-cv-01985-JSW Document 59 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION REQUESTING REVISION IN BRIEFING 2 U.S. DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. C05-01985 JSW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3. Counsel for Defendants Masuo Yoshimoto and M2M, Inc. inadvertently 

calendared the deadline for the responsive brief as March 13 as set forth in the Civil Minute 

Order rather than March 3 as stated by the Court during the December 16, 2005 Case 

Management Conference. As a result, counsel for Defendants Masuo Yoshimoto and M2M, Inc. 

scheduled a brief vacation (with non-refundable airline tickets) from Saturday, February 25 

through Wednesday, March 1, 2006. 

4. Counsel for Defendants Masuo Yoshimoto and M2M, Inc. did not realize his error 

until Tuesday, February 22 when he spoke with counsel for Defendant M.P. Technologies, Inc. 

Counsel for Defendants Masuo Yoshimoto and M2M, Inc. then telephoned the Court's clerk who 

confirmed that the correct date for filing responsive briefs is March 3. The Court then issued an 

Amended Civil Minute Order for the December 16, 2005 Case Management Conference. 

5. Given that (1) counsel for Defendants Masuo Yoshimoto and M2M, Inc. will be 

unavailable from Saturday, February 25 through Wednesday, March 1, 2006, (2) it is necessary 

to schedule an international telephone conference involving multiple parties; and (3) it will be 

extremely difficult to do so in time to prepare a responsive brief and declarations in support of 

same; good cause exists to revise the briefing schedule set forth in the Court's Amended Civil 

Minute Order for the December 16, 2005 Case Management Conference. 

6. Accordingly, the parties request that the Court revise its Amended Civil Minute 

Order as follows: Responsive briefs will be due on Wednesday, March 8. (The Joint Case 

Management Conference Statement will remain due by Friday, March 10.) 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

SCHEDULE REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS 

Case 3:05-cv-01985-JSW Document 58 Filed 02/23/2006 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:05-cv-01985-JSW Document 59 Filed 02/24/06 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION REQUESTING REVISION IN BRIEFING 3 U.S. DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. C05-01985 JSW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

THE PARTIES SO STIPULATE, AND REQUEST THE COURT'S APPROVAL OF

THE ABOVE REVISION TO THE DECEMBER 16, 2005 AMENDED CIVIL MINUTE 

ORDER. 

Dated: February 23, 2006 

MOSLEY & GEARINGER LLP 

By: /s/ Brian Gearinger __ 

MARK L. MOSLEY 

BRIAN GEARINGER 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MASUO YOSHIMOTO and M2M, INC. 

Dated: February 23, 2006 

MORGENSTEIN & JUBELIRER LLP 

By: /s/ Robert B. Mullen __ 

ROBERT B. MULLEN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

M.P. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Dated: February 23, 2006 

COTCHETT, PITRE, SIMON & McCARTHY 

By: /s/ Laura Schlictmann __ 

Niall P. McCarthy 

 Laura Schlichtmann 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ROBERT R. CREAGER 

SCHEDULE REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS 

Case 3:05-cv-01985-JSW Document 58 Filed 02/23/2006 Page 3 of 4
 Case 3:05-cv-01985-JSW Document 59 Filed 02/24/06 Page 3 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 

REQUESTING REVISION IN BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

1 U.S. DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. C05-01985 JSW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT R. CREAGER, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

MASUO YOSHIMOTO, an individual, M.P. 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a corporation, and 

M2M, INC., a corporation, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 05-01985 JSW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION REQUESTING 

REVISION IN BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFS ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION 

TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO THE 

DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON 

CONVENIENS

 

The Court having reviewed the parties' stipulation to request that it revise the date for 

responsive briefs regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to the Doctrine of Forum 

non Conveniens that it set in the Amended Civil Minute Order for the December 16, 2005 Case 

Management Conference, and having found good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 

The date by which the parties are to file responsive briefs is CONTINUED from March 3, 

2006 to March 8, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February ___, 2006 __ 

 HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE 

United States District Court Judge 

REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS 

Case 3:05-cv-01985-JSW Document 58 Filed 02/23/2006 Page 4 of 4

24

Case 3:05-cv-01985-JSW Document 59 Filed 02/24/06 Page 4 of 4