Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-02100/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-02100-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICKY BOONE,

Plaintiff,

v.

RUBY, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:20-cv-02100 WBS DB P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed January 21, 2021, the court screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint 

and ordered plaintiff to either (a) file a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies 

identified by the court in this order; or (b) notify the court in writing he wishes to stand on his 

first amended complaint as written. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to respond 

to the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to 

obey a court order and failure to prosecute. The time period given has expired and plaintiff has 

not filed an amended complaint, requested an extension of time, or otherwise responded to the 

court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days 

Case 2:20-cv-02100-WBS-SCR Document 21 Filed 03/21/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: March 18, 2022

DLB7

boon2100.fta2

Case 2:20-cv-02100-WBS-SCR Document 21 Filed 03/21/22 Page 2 of 2