Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00616/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00616-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

CASE NO. 07CV0482-BTM (NLS) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BRETT JOHNSON, Individually and on Behalf 

of All Others Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

WIRELESS FACILITIES, INC., ERIC M. 

DEMARCO, SCOTT ANDERSON, BANDEL 

CARANO, WILLIAM HOGLUND, SCOT 

JARVIS, LAURA L. SIEGAL, CAROL A. 

CLAY, ANDREW LEITCH, MASOOD K. 

TAYEBI, DEANNA LUND, DAN STOKELY, 

WILLIAM OWENS, DAVE GARRISON, 

TERRY ASHWILL, DAVID LEE, THOMAS 

MUNRO AND MASSIH TAYEBI 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 07CV0482-BTM (NLS) 

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

JOINT MOTION CONSOLIDATING 

RELATED ACTIONS; EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT; DOCUMENT 

PRESERVATION 

LABORERS LOCAL 190 PENSION FUND, 

Individually and on Behalf of All Others 

Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

WIRELESS FACILITIES, INC., et al. 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 07CV0616-BTM (NLS) 

BRUCE REAMER, Individually and on Behalf of 

All Others Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

WIRELESS FACILITIES, INC., et al. 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 07CV0626-BTM (NLS) 

Case 3:07-cv-00616-NLS Document 5 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

CASE NO. 07CV0482-BTM (NLS) 

Pursuant to the Joint Motion Consolidating Related Actions; Extending Defendants’ Time 

to Respond to Complaint; Document Preservation, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby 

ordered that: 

1. These actions and all subsequently-filed related actions, other than derivative 

lawsuits, are hereby consolidated under Master File No. 07CV0482-BTM (NLS), which shall be 

captioned In re Wireless Facilities, Inc. Securities Litigation II. 

2. Defendants shall file a notice of consolidation in subsequently-filed related 

actions that are not derivative lawsuits. Any party may challenge consolidation of subsequentlyfiled actions by filing an objection within ten days of the filing of the notice of consolidation. 

3. Defendants need not respond to any of the complaints filed in this action prior to 

the filing of the consolidated Complaint. 

4. Once lead plaintiff has filed and served the consolidated Complaint, the 

parties shall meet and confer in good faith in order to set a reasonable time for which Defendants 

will have to respond to the Complaint. 

5. Once the parties have agreed upon a reasonable time to respond to the Complaint, 

the parties shall submit to the Court a stipulation and proposed order setting forth the agreed 

upon response date as well as a briefing schedule for any motion Defendants may file directed at 

the Complaint. 

6. All parties hereto shall give notice to their clients of their obligations regarding 

document preservation under the federal securities laws. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 21, 2007 

 Honorable Barry T. Moskowitz 

 United States District Judge 

 

Case 3:07-cv-00616-NLS Document 5 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 2