Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08089/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08089-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The sentence at page 12, lines 24 through 26, of the Report and Recommendation

should read, “Petitioner also testified that Griffen explained to him that the written plea

agreement did not include a specific sentence because judges in Yavapai county would not

“stipulate to an exact sentence.”

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert Stanley Paige, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, Director of the Arizona

Department of Corrections; and Terry

Goddard, Attorney General of the State of

Arizona,

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-8089-PCT-EHC (LOA)

ORDER

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court, having reviewed the record de novo,

adopts in full the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 15) and incorporates

the same as a part of this Order.1

 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 15).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, (Dkt. 1) is granted and the matter is remanded to

the state court to determine the specific relief Petitioner is afforded.

Case 3:07-cv-08089-EHC Document 17 Filed 08/10/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

DATED this 10th day of August, 2009.

Case 3:07-cv-08089-EHC Document 17 Filed 08/10/09 Page 2 of 2