Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00028/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00028-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Joseph E. Addiego III (CA SBN 169522) 

Mary McNeill (CA SBN 261500) 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 276-6500 

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 

Email: joeaddiego@dwt.com 

 marymcneill@dwt.com 

 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION 

CATHLEEN C. EMLER and ROBERT W. 

EMLER, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 1:16-cv-00028-DAD-BAM

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR

DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE 

BANK, N.A TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT; ORDER 

[Civ. L.R. 6-1] 

Complaint Filed December 9, 2015 

Complaint Served December 11, 2015

 

Case 1:16-cv-00028-DAD-BAM Document 11 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, on January 8, 2016, Defendant JPMorgan Chase N.A. (“Chase”) removed this 

matter from state court; 

WHEREAS, Chase’s original deadline to respond to the complaint was January 15, 2016; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs granted Chase a 30-day extension to respond to the complaint 

through February 15, 2016; and 

WHEREAS Plaintiffs granted Chase an additional 14-day extension to respond to the 

complaint through February 29, 2016; 

WHEREAS Plaintiffs granted Chase an additional 18-day extension to respond to the 

complaint through March 18, 2016 

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant Chase HEREBY STIPULATE AND 

AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The deadline for Chase to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ 

complaint shall be extended up to and including March 18, 2016. 

2. This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by 

Court order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED March 1, 2016. 

 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

Joseph E. Addiego, III 

Mary H. McNeill 

 

By: /s/ Mary H. McNeill Mary H. McNeill 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 

KETTNER LAW CORPORATION 

Marc S. Applbaum 

 By:/s/ Marc S. Applbaum 

Marc S. Applbaum 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

CATHLEEN C. EMLER and ROBERT W. 

 EMLER 

ATTESTATION 

Case 1:16-cv-00028-DAD-BAM Document 11 Filed 03/01/16 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

I, Mary H. McNeill, hereby attest that concurrences in the filing of this document have been 

obtained from each of the signatories. 

 /s/ Mary H. McNeill Mary H. McNeill 

ORDER 

 IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline for Chase to answer, move, or otherwise respond to 

Plaintiffs’ complaint shall be extended up to and including March 18, 2016. 

Dated: March 1, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00028-DAD-BAM Document 11 Filed 03/01/16 Page 3 of 3