Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01749/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01749-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY WATTS,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. RUGGIERO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-1749 TLN AC P

ORDER

On December 4, 2014, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate 

judge’s order filed November 21, 2014, denying Plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel. 

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly 

erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that the 

magistrate judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the 

magistrate judge filed November 21, 2014, is affirmed. 

Dated: December 23, 2014

Case 2:13-cv-01749-TLN-AC Document 31 Filed 12/30/14 Page 1 of 1