Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00527/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00527-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

URBANO JIMENEZ, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

 

 Defendant.

 /

06-cv-0527 LJO TAG

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLAINTIFF’S

SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT

(Doc. 22)

ORDER DIRECTING REMAND PURSUANT

TO SENTENCE FOUR of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST

DEFENDANT AND CLOSE THIS ACTION

Plaintiff Urbano Jimenez (“Plaintiff”), through counsel, seeks judicial review of an

administrative decision denying his claims for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the

Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq., and supplemental security income under

Title XVI of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. (Doc. 1). The matter has been referred to the

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72-302(c)(15).

On January 25, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations which

were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and

Recommendations were to be filed within fifteen (15) days of the date of service. (Doc. 22). 

The parties have not filed any objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 72(b), and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case.

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations

filed on January 25, 2008, to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.

Case 1:06-cv-00527-LJO-TAG Document 23 Filed 02/13/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on January 25, 2008 (Doc. 22), are

ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The matter is ORDERED remanded to Defendant, Michael J. Astrue, pursuant to

Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration of the weight and deference to be

accorded Plaintiff’s treating psychiatrist, in accordance with Orn v. Astrue, 495 F.3d 625 (9th

Cir. 2007); and

3. Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 1), is GRANTED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Plaintiff Urbano Jimenez and

against Defendant Michael J. Astrue and to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00527-LJO-TAG Document 23 Filed 02/13/08 Page 2 of 2