Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01360/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01360-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:160(1) National Labor Relations Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH F. FRANKL, Regional Director 

of Region 20 of the National Labor 

Relations Board, for and on behalf of the 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS 

BOARD,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED SITE SERVICES OF 

CALIFORNIA, INC.,

Respondent.

No. 2:15-CV-01360-TLN-CKD

ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Petitioner Joseph F. Frankl’s (“Petitioner”) 

Motion for Expedited Order for Injunctive Relief. (Corrected Pet., ECF No. 27.) The Court is in 

receipt of Petitioner’s request and thus notifies Petitioner as follows: The Court has carefully 

considered Petitioner’s petition for injunctive relief and will issue an order in due course after 

deciding cases with higher priority and considering this Court’s caseload. However, Petitioner is 

advised that the instant motion for expedited relief does not garner sympathy with the Court and 

is further delaying disposition of this matter as it creates one more filing for the Court to consider 

and respond to. Simply put, Petitioner’s motion is not well received, especially in light of the fact 

Case 2:15-cv-01360-TLN-CKD Document 28 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

that Petitioner’s numerous filings have contributed to the delay in deciding this matter. For 

example, this Court has had to not only consider Petitioner’s original filings, but corrected 

versions of such filings, creating twice the workload. (See i.e., Pet. For Inj., ECF No 1; Mem. 

ECF No. 12; Corrected Ex. B, ECF No. 17; Reply, ECF No. 18; Mot. To File Corrected Papers, 

ECF No. 21, 21-1, 21-2, 21-3, 21-4, 21-5, 21-6; 21-7.) In sum, Petitioner’s motion for injunctive 

relief will be ruled upon shortly, and the Court hereby DENIES Petitioner’s instant motion (ECF 

No. 27).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-01360-TLN-CKD Document 28 Filed 02/03/16 Page 2 of 2