Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04752/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04752-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEDRICK RILEY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

THE CITY OF RICHMOND, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-13-4752 MMC

ORDER LIFTING STAY OF FIRST

THROUGH FOURTH CAUSES OF

ACTION; SETTING DEADLINE FOR

DEFENDANTS TO FILE MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND HEARING

DATE ON MOTION

By order filed October 9, 2014, the Court stayed proceedings on the First through

Fourth Causes of Action in plaintiff Dedrick Riley’s (“Riley”) complaint, pending the

conclusion of Riley v. City of Richmond, Case No. 10-02843, a state court action brought

by Riley against the City of Richmond, one of the two defendants named herein. By order

filed August 18, 2015, the Court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the

remaining claim in the instant action, specifically, the Fifth Cause of Action, and,

additionally, directed the parties to file, no later than November 20, 2015, a Joint Status

Report apprising the Court as to the status of the above-referenced state court action.

//

//

Case 3:13-cv-04752-MMC Document 87 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

According to defendants, they prepared the instant status report and provided it to

plaintiff for review and revision, and plaintiff did not respond in any manner thereafter.

2

Defendants failed to provide the Court with a chambers copy of their Status Report. 

For future reference, defendants are reminded that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7)

and the Court’s Standing Orders, parties are required to provide for use in chambers one

paper copy of each document that is filed electronically.

2

Before the Court is “Defendants’ Status Report,”1 filed November 20, 2015,2 in which

defendants advise the Court that, on September 15, 2015, judgment was entered in the

state court proceeding in favor of the defendant therein, and that plaintiff did not appeal the

judgment. Defendants also seek leave to file a motion for summary judgment based on the

doctrine of issue and/or claim preclusion, and, in light of counsel for defendants’ schedule,

to set a hearing date on said motion in early April 2016. Having read and considered

defendants’ status report, the Court rules as follows:

1. As the state court action has concluded, the Court hereby LIFTS the stay of

proceedings on the First through Fourth Causes of Action.

2. Defendants’ request to file a motion for summary judgment based on the doctrine

of issue and/or claim preclusion is hereby GRANTED, and defendants are DIRECTED to

file, no later than March 4, 2016, their motion, such motion to be heard on April 8, 2016, at

9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 2, 2015 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-04752-MMC Document 87 Filed 12/02/15 Page 2 of 2