Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03531/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03531-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

---

1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARK WILSON 

Of Counsel 

Kerns, Pitrof, Frost & Pearlman, LLC 

Three First National Plaza 

70 West Madison St., #5350 

Chicago, IL 60602 

Telephone: (312) 261-4572 

Edward Ord, Esq. 

ORD & NORMAN 

250 Montgomery St., #1210 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 274-3800 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND

SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA 

Timothy McCaffery, Esq. 

Lombardi, Loper & Conant, LLP 

Lake Merritt Plaza 

1999 Harrison Street, Suit 2600 

Oakland, CA 94612-3541 

(510) 433-2600 

Attorney for Defendant 

SAN MATEO CREDIT UNION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and SAN MATEO 

CREDIT UNION, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO: C 06-03531 WHA 

WITH JURY DEMAND

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING 

CIVIL ACTION AND COMPLAINT 

 The stipulation of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF 

AMERICA and SAN MATEO CREDIT UNION to dismiss the above civil action with 

prejudice came before this Court on the date indicated below. The other party, the WELLS 

FARGO BANK, N.A., has been previously dismissed as a party with prejudice by this Court. 

Case 3:06-cv-03531-WHA Document 43 Filed 03/23/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:06-cv-03531-WHA Document 45 Filed 03/23/07 Page 1 of 2
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The Court had previously dismissed the party WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. The 

remaining parties TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA 

and SAN MATEO CREDIT UNION have stipulated that the Court can dismiss the abovecaptioned civil action and complaint with prejudice. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above civil action and complaint is dismissed 

with prejudice with each party bearing their own respective legal fees and costs. 

Dated March _____, 2007 _______________________________ 

Judge William Alsup 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-03531-WHA Document 43 Filed 03/23/2007 Page 2 of 2

23 U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:06-cv-03531-WHA Document 45 Filed 03/23/07 Page 2 of 2