Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01703/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01703-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 330
Nature of Suit: Federal Employers' Liability
Cause of Action: 45:51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS M. HASKIN, NO. CIV.S-05-1703 LKK DAD 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. ORDER

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, et al.,

 Defendants.

_______________________________/

Counsel for defendant having failed to explain by affidavit

“the failure of counsel to obtain a stipulation for the issuance of

such an order from other counsel or parties in the action,” as

required by Local Rule 6-144(e), defendant’s ex parte application for

order shortening time on defendant’s motion to compel is HEREBY

DENIED.

Nonetheless, the parties are advised that the Local Rules

provide as follows with respect to discovery motions:

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01703-LKK -DAD Document 21 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

If the notice of motion and motion are filed

concurrently with the joint statement, the motion

shall be placed on the next regularly scheduled

calendar for the Magistrate Judge or Judge

hearing the motion at least three (3) court days

thereafter.

Local Rule 37-251(a). Therefore, as a general matter, parties may

place a motion to compel on the undersigned’s weekly law and motion

calendar, which commences on Fridays at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 27,

so long as the notice of motion and motion and joint statement

regarding discovery dispute are filed concurrently on or before the

Tuesday of the week in question.

DATED: June 19, 2006.

DAD:th

Dad1/orders.civil/haskin1703.short.deny

Case 2:05-cv-01703-LKK -DAD Document 21 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2