Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01827/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01827-46/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

777768.1 1

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Bruce L. Simon (State Bar No. 96241) 

PEARSON, SIMON, SOTER, WARSHAW & PENNY, LLP 

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-9000 

Facsimile: (415) 433-9008 

Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 63607) 

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 

275 Battery Street, 30th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 

Telephone: (415) 956-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

Master File No. C07-1827 SI 

MDL No. 1827 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS. 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF 

EPSON IMAGING DEVICES 

CORPORATION; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and 

Defendant Epson Imaging Devices Corporation through their designated counsel, that the 

above-captioned action be dismissed without prejudice against Defendant Epson Imaging 

Devices Corporation only, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each 

party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case M:07-cv-01827-SI Document 433 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 434 Filed 01/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

777768.1 2

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: January 10, 2008 PEARSON, SIMON, SOTER, WARSHAW & 

PENNY, LLP 

 By: /s/ Bruce L. Simon 

 BRUCE L. SIMON 

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for the Direct 

Purchaser Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 

DATED: January 10, 2008 LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & 

BERNSTEIN, LLP 

 By: /s/ Richard M. Heimann 

 RICHARD M. HEIMANN 

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for the Direct 

Purchaser Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 

DATED: January 10, 2008 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & 

WALKER, LLP 

 By: /s/ Kevin C. McCann 

 KEVIN C. McCANN 

Attorney for Defendant EPSON IMAGING 

DEVICES CORPORATION 

 Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been obtained from Richard M. Heimann and Kevin C. 

McCann.

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Good cause appearing, Defendant Epson Imaging Devices Corporation is dismissed 

without prejudice from the Direct Purchaser Actions. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ______________, 2008 

 The Honorable Susan Illston 

United States District Court Judge 

Case M:07-cv-01827-SI Document 433 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 2 of 2 Case 3:07-md-01827-SI Document 434 Filed 01/15/08 Page 2 of 2