Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01063/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01063-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENISE BEYARD, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:21-cv-01063-JLT-SAB

ORDER HOLDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS FROM USING 

EXPERT TESTIMONY IN ABEYANCE

(ECF No. 77)

On October 30, 2024, Defendant filed a motion to exclude plaintiffs from using expert 

testimony. (ECF No. 77.) The discovery motion was held in abeyance until Defendants’ motion 

for reconsideration of this Court’s order granting Plaintiff’s motion to substitute class 

representatives (ECF No. 71) and Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and 

improper venue (ECF No. 72) were adjudicated. 

On December 5, 2024, the district judge denied Defendant’s motion for reconsideration 

as moot and granted the motion to dismiss with leave to amend. (ECF No. 92.) Because 

Plaintiffs have the opportunity to amend the complaint and Defendants may still file a renewed 

motion to dismiss, Defendant’s discovery motion shall continue to be held in abeyance. 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 1:21-cv-01063-KJM-SAB Document 94 Filed 12/10/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to exclude plaintiffs 

from using expert testimony (ECF No. 77) shall continue to be held in abeyance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 10, 2024 

STANLEY A. BOONE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:21-cv-01063-KJM-SAB Document 94 Filed 12/10/24 Page 2 of 2