Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00038/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00038-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 423
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157
Cause of Action: 28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 

Stipulated Protective Order RE: Documents Produced Pursuant to Order Entered August 30, 2005

00395228.WPD

KRISTEN GALLES

Equity Legal

10 Rosecrest Avenue

Alexandria, VA 22301

(703) 683-4491

(703) 683-4636 (facsimile)

Attorney for Plaintiffs: MICHAEL D. BURCH AND THE BANKRUPTCY ESTATE 

OF MICHAEL D. BURCH

PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

A Professional Corporation

Nancy J. Sheehan, SBN 109419

Brendan J. Begley, SBN 202563

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

(916) 929-1481 

(916) 927-3706 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Defendants: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,

LAWRENCE VANDERHOEF, GREG WARZECKA, PAM GILL-FISHER, ROBERT

FRANKS and LAWRENCE SWANSON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In Re: MICHAEL D. BURCH & SYLVIA

BURCH, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY

O F CALIFORNIA , LAWRENCE

VANDERHOEF, GREG WARZECKA,

PAM GILL-FISHER, ROBERT FRANKS

and LAWRENCE SWANSON,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

CASE NO. S. 04-38 WBS/GGH

S TIPULATE D PRO TEC TIV E

O RDER RE: DOCUMENT S

PRODUCED PURSUANT TO

ORDER ENTERED AUGUST 30,

2005

The parties to this action – Plaintiffs MICHAEL D. BURCH AND THE

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF MICHAEL D. BURCH (collectively “Plaintiffs”), and

Defendants REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (“REGENTS”),

LAWRENCE VANDERHOEF, GREG WARZECKA, PAM GILL-FISHER, ROBERT

Case 2:04-cv-00038-WBS-GGH Document 151 Filed 10/28/05 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 

Stipulated Protective Order RE: Documents Produced Pursuant to Order Entered August 30, 2005

00395228.WPD

FRANKS and LAWRENCE SWANSON (collectively “Defendants”) – acknowledge and

agree that the U.S. District Court entered an order in this action on August 30, 2005, which

instructed Defendants to produce to Plaintiffs various documents that Defendants assert are

privileged.

Defendants represent that they have gathered and marked all such documents (the

“Stipulated Documents”) as follows: UC 60, UC 80-87, UC 89-91, UC 94, UC 127-129,

UC 152, UC 165-167, UC 199-200, UC 264-265, UC 271-273, UC 294-296, UC 301-302,

UC 304-305, UC 308-310, UC 328, UC 333-335, UC 342-343, UC 389-391, UC 414-419,

UC 421-428, UC 552-559, UC 856-864, UC 866-869, UC 871-876, UC 885-886, UC 936-

938, UC 958, UC 964-966, UC 975-981, UC 983-986, UC 993-995, UC 998-1009, UC

1073-1078, UC 1092-1093, UC 1100-1108, UC 1216, UC 1218-1220, UC 1254-1263, UC

1266-1272, UC 1290-1293, UC 1310-1313, UC 1320, UC 1322-1327, UC 1368-1384, UC

1389-1393, UC 1397, UC 1408-1410, UC 1414-1420, UC 1428-1429, UC 1434-1440, UC

1459-1462, UC 1680-1681, UC 1708-1719, UC 2073-2081, UC 2085, UC 2095-2096, UC

2111-2140, UC 2142-2143, UC 2228, UC 2242-2247, UC 2302, UC 2347-2353, UC 2364-

2369, UC 2375-2377, UC 2417-2418, UC 2511-2513, UC 2528, UC 2531-2534, UC 2538-

2541, UC 2546-2549, UC 2618-2619, UC 2624-2644, UC 2658, UC 2743-2747, UC 2752,

UC 2786-2787, UC 2797-2800, UC 2804, UC 2806-2807, UC 2864, UC 3698, UC 4188,

UC 4208-4211, UC 4223-4224, UC 4232-4233, UC 4254-4255, UC 4263-4264, UC 4282-

4288, UC 4291-4293, UC 4295-4298, UC 4305-4313, UC 4318-4325, UC 4328-4331, UC

4334-4339, UC 4349-4350, UC 4358-4407, UC 4501-4504, UC 4506-4510, UC 4514-4539,

UC 4546-4624, UC 4626-4738, RPD1.0004-0005, RPD1.0120, RPD1.0135-0136,

RPD1.0449-0474, RPD1.0478-0488, RPD1.0495-0500, RPD1.0510-0512, RPD1.0516,

RPD1.0522-0523, RPD1.0542-0546, RPD1.0549-0561, RPD1.0577-0588, RPD1.0605-

0609, RPD1.0611, RPD1.0620-0652, RPD1.0665-0679, RPD1.0694-0700, RPD1.0702-

0706, RPD1.0713-0725, RPD1.1233-1244, RPD1.1246-1247, RPD1.1250-1258,

RPD1.1285, RPD1.1628-1633, RPD1.2269-2271, RPD1.2524-2533, RPD1.2535,

Case 2:04-cv-00038-WBS-GGH Document 151 Filed 10/28/05 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

 

Stipulated Protective Order RE: Documents Produced Pursuant to Order Entered August 30, 2005

00395228.WPD

RPD1.2542, RPD1.2549-2550, RPD1.2588-2591,RPD1.2596-2605, and RPD1.2627-2632.

Defendants further represent that these documents constitute the entirety of the responsive

documents claimed as privileged.

Defendants contend that the Stipulated Documents should be subject to a protective

order. Plaintiffs do not concede that the documents are such that they ultimately should be

subject to such an order. However, in order to expedite their production, Plaintiffs herein

stipulate that the Stipulated Documents shall be treated as protected documents under this

Stipulated Protective Order unless and until otherwise designated by the Court.

Therefore, subject to and without waiving any objections to admissibility of 

the Stipulated Documents, the parties hereby stipulate that access to and use of such

Stipulated Documents and the non-public information contained therein shall be governed

by the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, and that the terms of this stipulated

protective order may be entered by the Court. This Stipulated Protective Order shall also

apply to all non-public information contained in any extracts or summaries of the Stipulated

Documents.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel of

record, hereby stipulate to the entry of the following Stipulated Protective Order regarding

the disclosure and production of the above stated Stipulated Documents:

1. The Stipulated Documents will be produced by Defendants to Plaintiffs

bearing the designation “CONFIDENTIAL.”

2. The non-public information contained in the Stipulated Documents shall be

used only for the purpose of the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action and the

related action for which discovery is merged, Mansourian v. Regents of the University of

California, et al., E.D. Cal. Case No. S-03-2591-FCD/PAN. Plaintiffs, their counsel and

their agents shall not disclose, release, or otherwise publish any of the non-public

information contained in the Stipulated Documents except as necessary in the litigation of

either case. 

Case 2:04-cv-00038-WBS-GGH Document 151 Filed 10/28/05 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

 

Stipulated Protective Order RE: Documents Produced Pursuant to Order Entered August 30, 2005

00395228.WPD

3. Stipulated Documents produced pursuant to this Stipulated Protected Order

may be disclosed or made available only to the Court, court reporters employed in the

litigation, the parties, counsel for the parties, (including the paralegal, clerical, and

secretarial staff employed by such counsel), witnesses at trial or deposition, expert

witnesses and/or consultants, and persons whose review or input on the documents is

necessary to the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action and the related action for

which discovery is merged, Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California, et al.,

E.D. Cal. Case No. S-03-2591-FCD/PAN (“Qualified Persons”).

4. All persons who obtain access to the Stipulated Documents pursuant to this

Stipulated Protective Order shall also be subject to its terms and shall agree not to disclose

any of the non-public information obtained except under the terms of this order.

5. The portion of any deposition in which non-public information from the

Stipulated Documents is discussed shall be taken only in the presence of the court reporter

and the Qualified Persons listed above unless counsel for all parties agree otherwise.

6. The portion of any motion, application, petition, or the like, filed with the

Court which includes non-public information from the Stipulated Documents shall be filed

under seal unless counsel for all parties agree otherwise.

7. Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order shall impose any restriction on the

use or disclosure of material obtained independent of the aforementioned Stipulated

Documents, whether or not such material is also contained therein. Nor shall this Stipulated

Protective Order restrict any party from disclosing such independently obtained information

as he/she deems appropriate. The production and receipt of the Stipulated Documents shall

not constitute an admission that the information contained therein is confidential or

otherwise privileged; nor shall it constitute an admission or waiver with respect to the

ultimate admissibility of the Stipulated Documents or the information contained therein.

8. This Stipulated Protective Order shall survive the final termination of this

action and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve any dispute concerning the use of

Case 2:04-cv-00038-WBS-GGH Document 151 Filed 10/28/05 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

 

Stipulated Protective Order RE: Documents Produced Pursuant to Order Entered August 30, 2005

00395228.WPD

the Stipulated Documents or any information contained therein. Stipulated Documents

covered by this order shall remain subject to this order even after the conclusion of this case

and may be retained for as long as required by law and then destroyed.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: October _24__, 2005 /s/ 

Kristen Galles 

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Dated: October _21___, 2005

______/s/_____________________________

Brendan J. Begley

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 25, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-00038-WBS-GGH Document 151 Filed 10/28/05 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

 

Stipulated Protective Order RE: Documents Produced Pursuant to Order Entered August 30, 2005

00395228.WPD

BURCH v. BOARD OF REGENTS, et al.

U.S. DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT CASE NO. S 04-38 WBS/GGH

________________________________________________________________________

 PROOF OF SERVICE

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County of Sacramento. I

am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above-entitled action; my business

address is 350 University Avenue, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95825.

On October 24, 2005, I served the following: 

 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: DOCUMENTS PRODUCED

 PURSUANT TO ORDER ENTERED AUGUST 30, 2005

XX BY MAIL. I caused such envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed

in the United States mail at Sacramento, California.

___ BY PERSONAL SERVICE. I caused such document to be delivered by hand to the

office of the person(s) listed below.

 BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY. I caused such document to be delivered by

overnight delivery to the office of the person(s) listed below.

 BY FACSIMILE. I caused such document to be faxed to the office of the person(s)

listed above with a original or copy of said document placed in the United States

mail with postage thereon fully prepaid at Sacramento, California.

addressed as follows:

Kristen Galles 

EQUITY LEGAL

10 Rosecrest Avenue

Alexandria, VA 22301

Richard J. Hanf

P.O. Box 6499

Napa, CA 94581

Dan Siegel

Anne Butterfield Weills

SIEGEL & YEE

499 14th Street, Suite 220

Oakland, CA 94612

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and was executed

on October 24, 2005, at Sacramento, California.

 

Cindy Cannon

Case 2:04-cv-00038-WBS-GGH Document 151 Filed 10/28/05 Page 6 of 6