Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06003/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06003-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits

---

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: CONTINUING TIME TO RESPOND

MASTER FILE NO. C-12-6003 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ

MARC WOLINSKY (pro hac vice)

GEORGE T. CONWAY III (pro hac vice)

VINCENT G. LEVY (pro hac vice)

51 West 52nd Street

New York, NY 10019

Tel./Fax: 212.403.1000/2000

MWolinsky@wlrk.com

GTConway@wlrk.com

VGLevy@wlrk.com

FARELLA, BRAUN & MARTEL, LLP

NEIL A. GOTEINER, State Bar No. 83524

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel./Fax: 415.954.4400/4480

NGoteiner@fbm.com

Attorneys for Defendant

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE HP SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE 

LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: All Actions

Master File No. C-12-6003 CRB

STIPULATION REGARDING 

CONTINUATION OF TIME FOR HP 

TO RESPOND TO SUSHOVAN 

HUSSAIN’S RENEWED MOTION TO 

INTERVENE AND ORDER 

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:12-cv-06003-CRB Document 335 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 4
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: CONTINUING TIME TO RESPOND

MASTER FILE NO. C-12-6003 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This Stipulation is entered into by and among Sushovan Hussain, Stanley Morrical, and 

Nominal Defendant Hewlett Packard Company (“HP”), by and through their respective counsel. 

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, the Court granted preliminary approval of the third amended settlement on 

March 13, 2015. (Docket # 319).

WHEREAS, the Court issued an order on March 31, 2015 recommending that Sushovan 

Hussain’s “motion to intervene be resolved prior to the final approval hearing.” (Docket # 332);

WHEREAS, Sushovan Hussain filed a renewed motion to intervene in the derivative 

action on April 10, 2015. (Docket # 333);

WHEREAS, HP requests additional time to respond to Mr. Hussain’s renewed motion;

WHEREAS, Mr. Hussain does not oppose an extension if approved by the Court but 

opposes, for scheduling reasons, any continuation of the previously noticed May 15, 2015, 

hearing date on his renewed motion;

NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED 

AND AGREED, by and among HP and the undersigned that:

1. HP and Stanley Morrical may file their responses to Mr. Hussain’s renewed motion to 

intervene on April 29, 2015.

2. Mr. Hussain’s reply brief will be due on May 6, 2015.

Case 3:12-cv-06003-CRB Document 335 Filed 04/27/15 Page 2 of 4
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: CONTINUING TIME TO RESPOND

MASTER FILE NO. C-12-6003 CRB

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 23, 2015 WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ

By: /s/ George T. Conway III

Marc Wolinsky

George T. Conway III

Vincent G. Levy

51 West 52nd Street

New York, NY 10019

Telephone: (212) 403-1000

Facsimile: (212) 403-2000

FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL, LLP

Neil A. Goteiner

235 Montgomery Street

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 954-4400

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 

Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company

Dated: April 23, 2015 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

By: /s/ Jan Little

John W. Keker

Jan Nielsen Little

Brook Dooley

Nicholas D. Marais

633 Battery Street

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Sushovan Hussain

Dated: April 23, 2015 COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP

By: /s/ Mark Molumphy

MARK C. MOLUMPHY

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STANLEY MORRICAL

Case 3:12-cv-06003-CRB Document 335 Filed 04/27/15 Page 3 of 4
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: CONTINUING TIME TO RESPOND

MASTER FILE NO. C-12-6003 CRB

3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulationDVPRGLILHG, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: April 27, 2015 __________________________________ 

 Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:12-cv-06003-CRB Document 335 Filed 04/27/15 Page 4 of 4