Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06029/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06029-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1/ 1/The complaint was filed before legislation increasing the filing fee to $250.00 took effect.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUHAREM KURBEGOVICH, ) 1:04-CV-OWW SMS

 )

) 

Plaintiff, ) ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND 

) RECOMMENDATION TO DENY 

v. ) PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO 

) PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO

DEPUTY FBI DIRECTOR, et al., ) ORDER PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE 

 ) FILING FEE (DOCS. 12,2) 

) 

Defendant ) ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY

______________________________) A $150.00 FILING FEE WITHIN

FIFTEEN DAYS OF SERVICE OF THIS

ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an

action for damages and other relief concerning alleged civil rights

violations against an unnamed postmaster and unnamed deputy FBI

director. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304.

On January 9, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and

recommendations that Plaintiff be denied leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and be ordered to submit the $150.00 filing fee in full 1

Case 1:04-cv-06029-OWW -SMS Document 13 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

within fifteen (15) days; and further, that if the fee is not

timely paid, the action be dismissed without prejudice. The

findings and recommendations contained notice that any party might

file objections within fifteen days after service of the findings

and recommendations, and they were served in Plaintiff by mail on

January 9, 2006. Over fifteen days have passed since service, and

no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)© and

Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th

Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case, 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the

findings and recommendation are supported by the record and proper

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 9, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The Court FINDS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) that

Plaintiff IS INELIGIBLE to proceed in forma pauperis in

the instant action, and the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s

request for an order permitting him to proceed in forma

pauperis; and

3. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to pay the $150.00 filing fee

within fifteen (15) days, or the action will be dismissed

without prejudice.

Case 1:04-cv-06029-OWW -SMS Document 13 Filed 03/01/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 1, 2006 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER 

OLIVER W. WANGER

United States District Judge

Case 1:04-cv-06029-OWW -SMS Document 13 Filed 03/01/06 Page 3 of 3