Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00244/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00244-64/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4769087.1 1 

FURTHER ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CASE NOS. 00-20905; 05-00334; 05-02298; 06-00244 RMW 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 

RAMBUS INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX 

SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX 

SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 

AMERICA INC., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 

SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., 

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, 

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 

U.S.A., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 05-00334 RMW 

[] FURTHER ORDER 

REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT

Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte 

RAMBUS INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

CASE NO. C 05-02298 RMW 

*E-FILED - 4/7/08*

Case 5:06-cv-00244-RMW Document 1265 Filed 04/07/08 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4769087.1 - 2 - 

 FURTHER ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CASE NOS. 00-20905; 05-00334; 05-02298; 06-00244 RMW 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 

SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., 

Defendants. 

RAMBUS INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., and MICRON 

SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 06-00244 RMW 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX 

SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX 

SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 

AMERICA INC., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

RAMBUS INC., 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 00-20905 RMW 

Case 5:06-cv-00244-RMW Document 1265 Filed 04/07/08 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4769087.1 - 3 - 

 FURTHER ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CASE NOS. 00-20905; 05-00334; 05-02298; 06-00244 RMW 

Pursuant to the case management conference held on March 27, 2008, the Court hereby 

sets the following schedule in connection with certain matters in the above-captioned cases: 

(1) With respect to the coordinated trial that began on January 29, 2008, the 

Manufacturers shall file a brief on the impact of the jury’s verdict on the findings of fact and 

conclusions of law to be made by the Court with regard to the equitable claims and defenses tried 

to the Court, any renewed motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50, and any motion 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 no later than April 10, 2008. Rambus shall file 

oppositions no later than April 17, 2008, and the Manufacturers shall file replies no later than 

April 24, 2008. The Court will hear argument on these motions on May 1, 2008. 

(2) Hynix may file a supplemental brief in support of its Motion for a New Trial on 

Invalidity Due to Prior Art, originally filed on May 16, 2006 in Case No. C 00-20905, no later 

than April 25, 2008. Rambus may file an opposition no later than May 9, 2008, and Hynix may 

file a reply no later than May 16, 2008. The Court will hear argument on this motion on May 23, 

2008. 

(3) The hearing on claim construction and summary judgment motions dependent on 

claim construction in Case Nos. C 05-00334, C 05-02298, and C 06-00244, previously scheduled 

on March 25-26, 2008, will be held on June 4-5, 2008. 

(4) The Manufacturers may serve supplemental invalidity contentions in Case Nos. C 

05-00334, C 05-02298, and C 06-00244 no later than April 28, 2008. 

(5) With respect to Rambus’s request for supplemental damages and further equitable 

relief in Case No. C 00-20905: 

 (a) Hynix will inform Rambus no later than April 4, 2008, whether Hynix will 

provide additional information relevant to damages. 

 (b) Rambus will file papers in support of its request no later than May 9, 2008. 

Hynix will file its opposition no later than May 23, 2008 and Rambus will file any reply no later 

than June 6, 2008. The Court will hear Rambus’s request on June 18, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. 

 (c) If either party expects to present live testimony at the hearing, it shall so state 

in its papers and shall also provide a description of the testimony it wishes to present as well as 

Case 5:06-cv-00244-RMW Document 1265 Filed 04/07/08 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4769087.1 - 4 - 

 FURTHER ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CASE NOS. 00-20905; 05-00334; 05-02298; 06-00244 RMW 

the purpose of the testimony.

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

DATED: , 2008 By: 

 Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

 United States District Judge 

SUBMITTED BY: 

Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP 

_______/s/_____________________

 Gregory P. Stone 

Attorneys for Rambus Inc. 

APPROVED AS TO FORM: 

Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP 

________/s/____________________

 Theodore G. Brown III 

Attorneys for Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Hynix 

Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix 

Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc., 

Hynix Semiconductor U.K., and Hynix 

Semiconductor Deutschland GmbH 

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges 

________/s/____________________

 Robert J. Becher 

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., and 

MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC. 

4/7/08

Case 5:06-cv-00244-RMW Document 1265 Filed 04/07/08 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4769087.1 - 5 - 

 FURTHER ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CASE NOS. 00-20905; 05-00334; 05-02298; 06-00244 RMW 

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

_____/s/________________________

 David J. Healey 

Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and 

Samsung Austin Semiconductor, L.P. 

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 

_________/s/____________________

 Jason Angell 

Nanya Technology Corporation and 

Nanya Technology Corporation U.S.A. 

Case 5:06-cv-00244-RMW Document 1265 Filed 04/07/08 Page 5 of 5