Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01303/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01303-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

JAMES S. GOUGH, an unmarried man,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

CAROLYN JOY BERRY, an unmarried

woman; JOY BERRY ENTERPRISES,

INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-1303-PHX-JAT

ORDER

Pending before this Court is Defendant Joy Berry Enterprises, Inc.’s Motion to

Dismiss (Doc. # 9) and Motion for Protective Order (Doc. # 22), Plaintiff’s Motion for

Jurisdictional Discovery (Doc. # 16), Plaintiff’s Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of

Carolyn Joy Berry (Doc. # 31), and Plaintiff’s Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice of Joy

Berry Enterprises, Inc. (Doc. # 32).

Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of Carolyn Joy

Berry, and Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds

that dismissal as requested by Plaintiff is proper. Further, according to Plaintiff’s Notice of

Dismissal with Prejudice of Joy Berry Enterprises, Inc., and Defendant Joy Berry

Enterprises, Inc. having not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, pursuant to

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), see Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493,1506 (9th Cir. 1995),

Case 2:08-cv-01303-JAT Document 33 Filed 04/13/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s case against Defendant Joy Berry Enterprises, Inc.

is dismissed with prejudice; that Plaintiff’s case against Defendant Carolyn Joy Berry is

dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Defendant Joy Berry Enterprises, Inc.’s

Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 9) as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Defendant Joy Berry Enterprises, Inc.’s

Motion for Protective Order (Doc. # 22) as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Jurisdictional

Discovery (Doc. # 16) as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating oral argument currently set for May 4, 2009,

at 11:00 a.m. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED directing the Clerk’s office to close the case.

DATED this 13th day of April, 2009.

Case 2:08-cv-01303-JAT Document 33 Filed 04/13/09 Page 2 of 2