Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00102/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00102-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PDL, Inc., dba ALLSTARS SCHOOL

OF DRIVING,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0102 WBS GGH 

vs.

ALL STAR DRIVING SCHOOL, et al., SUMMARY ORDER

Defendants.

__________________________________/

Previously pending on this court’s law and motion calendar for October 25, 2007,

was plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery. Daniel Ballard appeared for plaintiff and Krista

Dunzweiler appeared for defendants. Having reviewed the joint statement heard oral argument,

the court now issues the following summary order. 

I. Interrogatories

Number 1 

IDENTIFY and state the location of all driving schools doing

business under a trade name containing "All Star" or "Allstars" of

which you were aware before YOU began promoting YOUR

business under the trade name ALL STAR DRIVING SCHOOL.

Ex. B at 3.

Defendants shall respond to this interrogatory as phrased.

Number 20

State the amount of monthly revenues that YOU and YOUR ALL

Case 2:07-cv-00102-WBS-GGH Document 67 Filed 10/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

STAR DRIVING SCHOOL business received from July 2003 to

the present as a result of doing business as ALL STAR DRIVING

SCHOOL. 

Ex. B at 21.

Defendants will not be required to respond further as counsel indicated at hearing

that they do not maintain such monthly records. Plaintiff, however, may pose a new

interrogatory if it so desires.

II. Document Requests (numbered 1-8, 12-15, 17-21, 29-33, and 35-37)

For each response to the disputed document requests, defendants shall identify the

previously produced documents pertinent to each request. Defendants shall also submit verified

responses to all disputed document requests which state that all documents responsive to each

request have been produced, except for those documents for which a privilege has been claimed

and which are identified in defendants’ privilege log.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel supplemental

discovery responses, filed September 9, 2007, is granted in part. Defendants shall respond to the

discovery outlined above on or before November 9, 2007.

DATED: 10/29/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS,

GGH:076 -PDLAllStars102.dsy.wpd UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00102-WBS-GGH Document 67 Filed 10/29/07 Page 2 of 2