Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00909/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00909-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMY MCCONNELL, et al., NO. CIV.S-05-0909 FCD DAD

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER

LASSEN COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

This matter came before the court on January 12, 2007, for

hearing on the motion to compel production of documents and responses

to interrogatories filed on behalf of defendants Terry Chapman, James

Chapman, Jack Hanson, Brian Dahle and Lassen County and a motion for

terminating sanctions due to failure to comply with the court’s prior

discovery order brought on behalf of defendants Lloyd Keefer, Bob

Pyle and Terry Chapman. Treva Hearne appeared on behalf of

plaintiffs. Kathleen J. Williams appeared on behalf of all moving

defendants. Having considered all written materials submitted in

connection with the motion, and after hearing oral argument, for the

Case 2:05-cv-00909-MCE-DAD Document 96 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

reasons more fully set forth on the record during the hearing, it is

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ motion to compel production of documents

and further answers to interrogatories is granted in part and denied

in part as indicated;

2. Plaintiffs and their counsel shall comply with the

terms of this order by providing all supplemental discovery

responses, including proper verifications, on or before January 18,

2007; 

3. On or before March 13, 2007, counsel for plaintiffs

shall pay sanctions to defense counsel in the amount of $1,000 to

cover the expenses of bringing the motion to compel with the court

retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this order; and

4. Defendants’ motion for terminating sanctions is denied

in its entirety.

DATED: January 18, 2007.

Ddad1\orders.civil\mcconnell.oah.111706

Case 2:05-cv-00909-MCE-DAD Document 96 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 2