Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03723/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03723-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1120.02P214 -1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-2800/C03-3723 TEH)

PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)

OK-HEE SHIM, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 240998)

PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

The Latham Square Building

1611 Telegraph Ave., Suite 1450

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-0292

Facsimile: (510) 452-5625

HOWARD MOORE, JR., ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 55228)

MOORE & MOORE

445 Bellevue, Suite 202

Oakland, CA 94610

Telephone: (510) 451-0104

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CLARK WALKER

SILVANO B. MARCHESI (SBN 42965)

County Counsel

BERNARD L. KNAPP (SBN 111720)

Deputy County Counsel

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

651 Pine Street, 9th Floor

Martinez, California 94553

Telephone: (925) 335-1800

Facsimile: (925) 335-1866

Email: bknap@cc.cccounty.us

Attorneys for Defendants

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, ET AL.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARK WALKER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, KEITH

RICHTER, and RICHARD GRACE,

Defendants.

 

AND RELATED CASE.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NOS. C05-2800 TEH 

C03-3723 TEH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO ENLARGE THE TIME

TO OBJECT TO WITNESSES AND

EXHIBITS 

Case 3:03-cv-03723-TEH Document 156 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1120.02P214 -2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-2800/C03-3723 TEH)

1. Plaintiff CLARK WALKER (“Chief Walker”) and Defendants CONTRA

COSTA COUNTY, KEITH RICHTER, and RICHARD GRACE, by and through their respective

counsel, jointly apply for an Order, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, to enlarge the time to object to

the parties’ respective witnesses and trial exhibits from October 20, 2006 to October 25, 2006.

2. Good cause exists to enlarge the time to object to the parties’ respective

witnesses and trial exhibits from October 20, 2006 to October 25, 2006, to permit the parties to

continue to meet and confer meaningfully and in good faith regarding possible resolution of any

objections in advance of the Final Pretrial Conference on October 30, 2006.

DATED: October 20, 2006 PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

 /s/

 

OK-HEE SHIM, Attorneys for 

Plaintiff CLARK WALKER

DATED: October 20, 2006 SILVANO B. MARCHESI, County Counsel

 /s/

 

BERNARD L. KNAPP, Deputy County Counsel,

Attorneys for Defendants CONTRA COSTA

COUNTY, KEITH RICHTER, and RICHARD

GRACE

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that the time to file objections to witnesses and exhibits be enlarged from

October 20, 2006 to October 25, 2006.

Date: _____________ 

HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

10/23/06

Case 3:03-cv-03723-TEH Document 156 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 2