Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01987/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01987-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

JON A. HEABERLIN (SBN 199810)

SUJATA T. REUTER (SBN 232148)

ROBERT B. BURCHFIEL (SBN 112318)

RANKIN | STOCK | HEABERLIN

96 No. Third Street, Suite 500

San Jose, California 95112-7709

Telephone : (408) 293-0463

Facsimile : (408) 293-9514

Emails: jheaberlin@rllss.com

 sreuter@rllss.com

Attorneys for Defendants:

CITY OF SANTA CLARA; CHIEF SELLERS;

CARREIRA, HENRY, CLOUSE, HILL,

HOSMAN, RUSH, MEAD, STEPHENS, C.

BELL, STEWART, NIESEN, THOMPSON,

GERBRANDT, CARDIN, DEGER, D. BELL,

AMOS, and MARTIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MUHAMMAD MONEEB;

MUHAMMAD IKRAM; HAZAKAT

IKRAM,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF SANTA CLARA; CHIEF

SELLERS; CARREIRA, HENRY,

CLOUSE, HILL, HOSMAN, RUSH,

MEAD, STEPHENS, C. BELL,

STEWART, NIESEN, THOMPSON,

GERBRANDT, CARDIN, DEGER, D.

BELL, AMOS, and MARTIN; et al.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 5:15-cv-1987 NC

3 Click here to copy title to footer

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs MUHAMMAD MONEEB, MUHAMMAD IKRAM, and HAZAKAT IKRAM, and

Defendants CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CHIEF SELLERS, CARREIRA, HENRY, CLOUSE,

HILL, HOSMAN, RUSH, MEAD, STEPHENS, C. BELL, STEWART, NIESEN,

Case 5:15-cv-01987-NC Document 43 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

THOMPSON, GERBRANDT, CARDIN, DEGER, D. BELL, AMOS, and MARTIN, by and

through their counsel of record, do hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The parties attended a settlement conference before Hon. Paul S. Grewal on

February 10, 2016. As a result of that settlement conference, plaintiffs presented a

demand to the defendants, which demand will be taken before the Santa Clara City

Council on two occasions – February 23 and March 8 , 2016. rd th

2. The parties request that this court continue the case management conference,

currently scheduled for February 24, 2016, at 10:00am, to some later date

convenient to the court in order to accommodate the dates for presentation of the

demand to the City Council.

3. The parties believe that continuance of the case management conference would be

the most efficient course of action because, if the demand is accepted by the City

Council, a subsequent case management conference may not be necessary.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: February 17, 2016 HADDAD & SHERWIN

By: /s/ T. Kennedy Helm

T. KENNEDY HELM

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: February 17, 2016 RANKIN | STOCK | HEABERLIN

By: /s/ Sujata T. Reuter

SUJATA T. REUTER

Attorney for Defendants

ORDER

The court, having reviewed the Stipulation by and between the parties, hereby finds

that good cause exists, and orders that:

The February 24, 2016, Case Management Conference date is vacated. The Case

Management Conference will be held on _________________, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. An

updated case management statement shall be filed by ________________, 2016.

Date: _______________ _______________________________

HON. NATHANAEL COUSINS

Case 5:15-cv-01987-NC Document 43 Filed 02/17/16 Page 2 of 2