Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00161/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00161-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Case No. 2:13-CV-00161-JAM-AC

15736849v.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Brandon R. McKelvey (SBN 217002) 

bmckelvey@seyfarth.com 

Timothy B. Nelson (SBN 235279) 

tnelson@seyfarth.com 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 

Sacramento, California 95814-4428 

Telephone: (916) 448-0159 

Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Thomas J. Piskorski (admitted pro hac vice) 

tpiskorski@seyfarth.com 

131 South Dearborn Street 

Suite 2400 

Chicago, IL 60603 

Telephone: (312) 460-5000 

Facsimile: (312) 460-7000 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COMTRAK LOGISTICS, INC. 

MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP 

Christina A. Humphrey (SBN 226326) 

chumphrey@marlinsaltzman.com 

29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 

Agoura Hills, California 91301 

Telephone: (818) 991-8080 

Facsimile: (818) 991-8081 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SALVADOR ROBLES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SALVADOR ROBLES, individually and on 

behalf of others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COMTRAK LOGISTICS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:13-CV-00161-JAM-AC

CLASS ACTION 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 

DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Case 2:13-cv-00161-JAM-AC Document 28 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 3
 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Case No. 2:13-CV-00161-JAM-AC

15736849v.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the April 23, 2013, Stipulation and Order, entered by this Court 

as docket number 23, the deadline for Defendant to file a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint was June 3, 2013; 

WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint 

on June 3, 2013, with a noticed hearing date of July 24, 2013; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served written discovery, including special interrogatories and 

requests for production of documents, to Defendant by United States mail on May 2, 2013; 

 WHEREAS, in order to preserve the parties’ and the Court’s resources until this Court 

hears Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, the parties have 

agreed to a temporary stay on discovery and have reached the following agreement, each subpart 

below being material and necessary to the entire agreement; 

THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel of record, agree to stipulate 

that: 

(a) The parties agree that they will not serve or propound any additional discovery 

until, at the earliest, the day after the Court issues its Order on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint; 

(b) All existing discovery is stayed and the discovery deadlines on the existing 

discovery are extended to thirty (30) days after the date that this Court issues its Order regarding 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint; 

(c) Defendant agrees that it will produce the name, last known address, phone 

number, and dates of affiliation with Defendant of all owner-operators that fall within Plaintiff’s 

proposed class definition (as stated in the First Amended Complaint) within thirty (30) days after 

the date that this Court issues its Order regarding Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint, assuming the Court’s order does not dismiss the class claims; and 

(d) The parties agree that Defendant’s production of the contact information for the 

group of owner-operators alleged in the proposed class definition in Plaintiff’s First Amended 

Case 2:13-cv-00161-JAM-AC Document 28 Filed 07/09/13 Page 2 of 3
 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Case No. 2:13-CV-00161-JAM-AC

15736849v.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Complaint, does not constitute a concession or admission that class certification is appropriate or 

that further class discovery is appropriate. Defendant reserves the right to object to further preclass certification discovery and to oppose class certification notwithstanding this stipulation. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: July 8, 2013 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

By: /s/ Timothy B. Nelson 

Thomas J. Piskorski 

Brandon R. McKelvey 

Timothy B. Nelson 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COMTRAK LOGISTICS, INC. 

Dated: July 8, 2013 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP 

By: /s/ Christina A. Humphrey 

Christina A. Humphrey 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SALVADOR ROBLES 

ORDER 

 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. 

DATED: July 8, 2013 

 /s/ John A. Mendez 

 John A. Mendez 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case 2:13-cv-00161-JAM-AC Document 28 Filed 07/09/13 Page 3 of 3