Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00106/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00106-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER MODIFYING THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER,

EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO

CONTINUE HEARING ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER THEREON

A PROANTHONY ANTHONY ANTHONY ANTHONY LAW FESSIONAL 30FESSIONAL 30FESSIONAL 30FESSIONAL 3001OFFIC LRoava seville seville seville seville J. POIDMORE J. POIDMORE J. POIDMORE J. POIDMORE Rid ES OF LAW ge, C Cali COR ouforrt, niaPORATION PORATION PORATION PORATION Suite 956 16130

LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY J. POIDMORE

A Professional Law Corporation

Anthony J. Poidmore (SBN 51346)

3001 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 130

Roseville, CA 95661

Telephone No.: 916-787-1290

FAX No.: 916-787-1293

Attorney for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOYCE GARDNER,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SHASTA COUNTY, GERALD BENITO,

ELIZABETH LESLIE, ANGELA

FITZGERALD, AND CAROL GALL,

 Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO.: 2:06-CV-00106-MCE-DAD

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR

ORDER MODIFYING THE

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING

ORDER, EXTENDING TIME TO

FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

TO CONTINUE HEARING ON

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

ORDER THEREON

________________________________

Plaintiff JOYCE GARDNER hereby applies to the Court ex parte for an Order modifying

the pretrial conference scheduling order to provide that the last day for hearing dispositive

motions be extended from the present deadline of May 25, 2007, to June 8, 2007, extending the

date of the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment from the presently scheduled

date of May 18, 2007, to June 8, 2007, and extending the time in which Plaintiff may file and

serve her papers in opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment by electronic service

to a date not less than seventeen (17) days preceding the hearing date and the date on which

Case 2:06-cv-00106-MCE-KJN Document 32 Filed 05/03/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER MODIFYING THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER,

EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO

CONTINUE HEARING ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER THEREON

Defendants must file their reply to a date not less than five (5) days preceding the date of the

hearing.

As stated in the Declaration of Anthony J. Poidmore in support of this application, the

undersigned counsel has contacted Defendants’ counsel seeking a stipulation and has received no

affirmative response as of the time of filing of this application, good cause exists for granting the

extension and such application is supported in the accompanying Points and Authorities and the

Declaration of Anthony J. Poidmore and Sandra Shahan. The undersigned counsel has again

attempted to communicate with defense counsel. My assistant telephoned his office and was

informed that a message was left for Mr. Brickwood yesterday and another message was left this

morning. Our office was informed that Mr. Brickwood is out of the office today and is in San

Rafael. Thereupon, my assistant, through his legal assistant has put Mr. Brickwood on notice

that an ex parte request will be made to this court. 

Plaintiff has not sought or obtained any previous extensions of time.

Dated: May 2, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY J. POIDMORE

A Professional Law Corporation

 /s/ Anthony J. Poidmore

 

 ANTHONY J. POIDMORE

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 2:06-cv-00106-MCE-KJN Document 32 Filed 05/03/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER MODIFYING THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER,

EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO

CONTINUE HEARING ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER THEREON

ORDER

Having considered Plaintiff’s ex parte application for an extension of time to file her

papers in opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and finding good cause

therefor,

IT IS ORDERED that the pretrial scheduling order be and is hereby amended so that

dispositive motions may be heard no later than June 8, 2007.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on the motion is continued to June 8, 2007,

at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3 of the above-entitled court.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff has to and including May 18, 2007 by which to

file her opposition papers.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ reply to Plaintiff’s opposition is due 

May 25, 2007.

Dated: May 2, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00106-MCE-KJN Document 32 Filed 05/03/07 Page 3 of 3