Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01711/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01711-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

06-01711 RMW

SPT

E-FILED on 2/28/07

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

INDIANA ELECTRICAL WORKERS

PENSION TRUST FUND, IBEW; SEIU

AFFILIATES' OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES

PENSION PLAN; SEIU NATIONAL

INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN; and PENSION

PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF SEIU, on behalf

of themselves and all others similarly situated,

and derivatively on behalf of Hewlett-Packard

Company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PATRICIA C. DUNN, LAWRENCE T.

BABBIO, RICHARD A. HACKBORN,

GEORGE A. KEYWORTH II, ROBERT E.

KNOWLING, JR., THOMAS PERKINS,

ROBERT L. RYAN, LUCILLE SALHANY,

and CARLETON S. FIORINA,

Defendants,

and

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,

Nominal Defendant.

No. C-06-01711 RMW

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Re Docket Nos. 91, 97]

Plaintiffs have moved for leave of court to file a second amended complaint, with hearing on

the matter noticed for March 2, 2007. Plaintiffs seek to add substantive claims and factual

allegations involving events that became publicized after the filing of their first amended complaint. 

Case 5:06-cv-01711-RMW Document 100 Filed 02/28/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

06-01711 RMW

SPT 2

Currently under submission with this court is defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' first amended

complaint for, inter alia, failure to make the required demand for what defendants' argue are

derivative claims. The court finds it appropriate to consider plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a

second amended complaint after issuance of an order on defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs'

first amended complaint. 

Therefore, the court hereby continues the hearing date for plaintiffs' motion to file a second

amended complaint to Friday, March 16, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiffs have also moved for leave to

file their reply seven days late because they did not receive defendants' opposition, which was timely

filed February 9, 2007, until February 20, 2007. The court grants the motion. Plaintiffs' reply shall

be considered timely filed.

DATED: 2/27/07

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-01711-RMW Document 100 Filed 02/28/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

06-01711 RMW

SPT 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiffs:

Merrill G. Emerick memerick@afelaw.com 

Counsel for Defendants:

Jonathan C. Dickey jdickey@gibsondunn.com 

Jayesh Sanatkumar Hines-Shah jhinesshah@gibsondunn.com

Jeffrey A Minnery jminnery@gibsondunn.com

Christopher C. Kearney ckearney@kvn.com

Laurie Carr Mims lmims@kvn.com

Boris Feldman boris.feldman@wsgr.com

Steven M. Schatz sschatz@wsgr.com 

Bahram Seyedin-Noor bnoor@wsgr.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 2/28/07 SPT

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:06-cv-01711-RMW Document 100 Filed 02/28/07 Page 3 of 3