Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00225/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00225-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM ATCHERLEY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EDGAR CLARK, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:12cv00225 LJO DLB PC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AS 

MOOT

(Document 206)

Plaintiff William Atcherley (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. 

This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, filed on October 14, 

2014, for violation of the Eighth Amendment and negligence against numerous Defendants. 

On January 16, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff’s November 24, 2014, motion for leave 

to file a Third Amended Complaint. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file his Third Amended 

Complaint, but explained that it would be subject to screening.

On January 26, 2015, the Court received a second motion for leave to file a Third 

Amended Complaint. Plaintiff signed the motion on January 15, 2015, and he did not yet have 

the Court’s prior ruling.

Case 1:12-cv-00225-LJO-DLB Document 209 Filed 01/28/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, as leave has already been granted, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED AS 

MOOT. 

Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, filed on January 26, 2015, will be screened in due 

course.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2015 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00225-LJO-DLB Document 209 Filed 01/28/15 Page 2 of 2