Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02504/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02504-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7564932.1 1 

STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 07 2504 RMW 

BRENDAN DOLAN, State Bar No. 126732 

L. JULIUS M. TURMAN, State Bar No. 226126 

STEVEN J. GARRETT, State Bar No. 221021 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

E-mail: bdolan@morganlewis.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

POSDATA CO., LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

POSDATA CO., LTD., a South Korean 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SEYOUNG KIM, an individual and 

INQUADRON, INC., a California 

corporation, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 07 2504 RMW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING THE USE AND 

DISSEMINATION OF CONFIDENTIAL 

INFORMATION PRODUCED BY THE 

PARTIES 

Plaintiff Posdata Co., LTD, (“Posdata”), Defendant Seyoung Kim (“Kim”), and Defendant 

InQuadron, Inc. (“InQuadron”) (collectively, the “Stipulating Parties”), through their respective 

counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to the following: 

1. In connection with this litigation, the Stipulating Parties have sought and/or may 

seek or inquire about or use certain documents, written discovery responses, deposition testimony 

and other information, including, but not limited to, private, confidential and/or trade secret 

information regarding mobile WiMAX technologies, channel cards, processors and components, 

printed circuit boards, design and layout and hardware and software interface. The parties may 

also seek information regarding product testing and comparisons, prototypes that have been 

invented, developed, manufactured, marketed or sold by Posdata, Kim or InQuadron, or financial, 

business or personnel information concerning Posdata or InQuadron (all such information is 

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 10

AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 8 Filed 06/19/07 Page 1 of 10
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7564932.1 -2- STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C 07 2504 RMW 

hereafter referred to as “Confidential Information”). 

2. The Stipulating Parties desire to protect the confidentiality, use and dissemination 

of such Confidential Information, which has been or may be sought by, produced to or used by 

one or more of the Stipulating Parties and/or inquired about by the Stipulating Parties at 

deposition. 

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED between Posdata, Kim and InQuadron, by and 

through their respective undersigned attorneys of record, that the Court may enter the following 

order, which shall pertain to: (1) any documents, materials, discovery responses or other 

information (collectively, “Documents”) which a Stipulating Party designates as Confidential 

Information and agree to produce, that is produced pursuant to order of the Court, or is used in 

connection with this litigation; and (2) the testimony of any deponent which any of the Stipulating 

Parties designates as Confidential Information as set forth in Paragraph F below: 

A. With respect to Documents which the disclosing Stipulating Party reasonably 

believes contain Confidential Information, the disclosing Stipulating Party shall either stamp such 

documents “CONFIDENTIAL” before the time of production or filing with the Court or when 

photocopied and delivered, or designate categories of documents in container(s) marked 

“CONFIDENTIAL” and provide a description of the designated categories of documents in the 

container(s). Such Documents will also bear a Bates stamp number, or some other mutually 

agreeable identifying number. 

After production of the documents, if requested by one of the parties, the parties shall 

meet and confer on the extent to which the documents marked “CONFIDENTIAL” are in fact 

entitled to the protections provided by this Stipulation. As to all documents or testimony 

designated Confidential, they shall be entitled to the protections set forth in this Stipulation. To 

the extent the parties do not agree that documents or testimony are properly designated 

Confidential, those documents shall be considered to be “Asserted Confidential Information.” 

This Asserted Confidential Information shall be entitled to the protections set forth in this 

Stipulation, unless the parties agree to remove that designation or the Court so orders. 

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 10 Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 8 Filed 06/19/07 Page 2 of 10
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7564932.1 -3- STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C 07 2504 RMW 

B. All Documents produced by the Stipulating Parties during discovery, documents 

filed with the Court and deposition testimony and transcripts thereof, which contain Confidential 

Information, shall be used by the Stipulating Parties and their attorneys of record only for the 

purposes of this litigation. 

C. Confidential Information produced by the Stipulating Parties pursuant to this 

Stipulation or filed with the Court, and deposition testimony and transcripts thereof, containing 

Confidential Information, may be disclosed or made available by the Stipulating Parties’ 

attorneys of record only to the Court (including courtroom personnel and jurors), court reporters, 

deposition videographers, translators, or to the following “Qualified Persons”: 

(i) The Stipulating Parties and their attorneys engaged in the litigation or trial 

of this action or any appeal therein, and to the Stipulating Parties’ attorneys’ employees who are 

actually involved in the litigation or trial of this action or any appeal therein; 

(ii) The author or creator of a document or thing designated as Confidential 

Information, the original source of the information contained in it, any persons listed as 

addressees or as having been copied or blind copied, and any persons whom other documents 

reasonably identity as authors or recipients; 

(iii) Experts or consultants (together with their clerical staff) retained by the 

Stipulating Parties to assist in the preparation, trial, appeal or settlement of this action; 

(iv) In-house legal staff, officers, directors or employees of any party (party’s 

personnel) to this action, necessary for the preparation of this case, provided that the confidential 

information to be disclosed a specific member of the party’s personnel is of the subject, type and 

nature of information which would normally be the disclosed to the specific member personnel in 

the course and scope of their duties with the party; 

(v) Any court-appointed expert witnesses; 

(vi) Any private mediator designated by the Stipulating Parties; 

(vii) Any persons or entities that provide litigation support services, including 

without limitation photocopying, organizing or storing or retrieving data, or graphics or trial 

consultants, including their employees; 

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 3 of 10 Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 8 Filed 06/19/07 Page 3 of 10
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7564932.1 -4- STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C 07 2504 RMW 

(viii) Any other persons to whom the Stipulating Parties agree in writing; and 

(ix) Any other persons to whom the Court orders disclosure of any Confidential 

Information. 

D. Each Qualified Person referred to in paragraphs C(iii)-(vi) and (viii)-(ix) to whom 

access to Confidential Information is permitted and/or disclosure of the Confidential Information 

is made shall not have access to Confidential Information or material contained therein until that 

person has certified that he/she has read this Stipulation and has manifested that person’s assent to 

be bound thereby by signing a copy of the Written Assurance of Confidentiality attached hereto 

as Exhibit A (“Written Assurance”). In the case of a Qualified Person referred to in paragraph 

C(vii), either the person receiving the disclosure or an authorized representative of such service or 

vendor shall sign the Written Assurance. Once a Qualified Person has executed such a Written 

Assurance, it shall not be necessary for that person to sign a separate Written Assurance each time 

that person is subsequently given access to Confidential Information. Each Written Assurance 

executed by a Qualified Person referred to in paragraphs C(ii)-(vii) above, except a Written 

Assurance executed by a consultant who is not yet designated an expert, shall be served upon all 

Stipulating Parties herein within five (5) business days of execution by the Qualified Person. In 

the case of a consultant who is not yet a designated expert, the Stipulating Parties shall notify 

opposing counsel that a consultant has executed a Written Assurance. The Stipulating Parties 

shall not have to reveal the identity of such consultants, however, except as provided in FRCivP 

26(A)(2) AND (b)(4)(B) pertaining to disclosure of expert witness information. However, at such 

time as disclosure of expert is required under Rule 26, a copy of the expert/consultant’s executed 

Written Assurance shall be produced. At the time of the termination of this lawsuit by settlement, 

judgment or exhaustion of appeals (if any), the Stipulating Parties’ attorneys of record shall 

provide all other Stipulating Parties’ attorneys of record with copies of each executed Written 

Assurance not previously served. 

E. To the extent the Stipulating Parties’ attorneys, experts, consultants, or any 

witnesses or potential witnesses prepare summaries of “CONFIDENTIAL” materials, or cause 

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 4 of 10 Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 8 Filed 06/19/07 Page 4 of 10
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7564932.1 -5- STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C 07 2504 RMW 

such summaries to be prepared, such summaries shall be subject to the terms of this Stipulation 

and Order. 

F. If Confidential Information is disclosed at a deposition, only those persons may be 

present who are authorized by the terms of this Stipulation and Order to have access to such 

material. Any testimony of a deponent which any Stipulating Party deems confidential shall be 

transcribed and bound separately and marked by the reporter in accordance with Paragraph A 

above. The use and dissemination of such testimony by the Stipulating Parties or their attorneys 

of record shall be subject to the terms set forth in this Stipulation. 

G. Any court hearing which refers to or describes Confidential Information may, in 

the Court’s discretion, be held in camera. 

H. If a Stipulating Party in possession of Confidential Information designated as 

“CONFIDENTIAL” receives a subpoena from a non-party to this Stipulation and Order which 

seeks production or other disclosure of Confidential Information, that Stipulating Party shall 

immediately give written notice to counsel to the Party who designated the Confidential 

Information as “CONFIDENTIAL” stating the Confidential Information sought and enclosing a 

copy of the subpoena. Where possible, at least ten (10) days’ notice before production or other 

disclosure should be given. In no event shall production or disclosure be made before telephonic 

notice is given and, whenever possible, sufficiently in advance of production or disclosure to 

afford the Party to whom such notice has been given at least three (3) business (i.e., non-holiday, 

weekdays) days to take appropriate action, including seeking judicial relief. 

I. This Stipulation and Order shall not preclude a Stipulating Party from 

requesting by motion the entry of a protective order prohibiting disclosure of certain Confidential 

Information to the Stipulating Parties themselves, including their employees or officers. Any 

such motion shall be subject to the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and 

Northern District Civil Local Rule 37-1. The Confidential Information that is proposed to be 

subject to any motion for protective order under this Section I shall be produced informally to 

counsel of record for the other Stipulating Party or Parties during the period for the conference 

required by Local Rule 37-1. Documents and data produced informally hereunder shall be 

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 5 of 10 Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 8 Filed 06/19/07 Page 5 of 10
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7564932.1 -6- STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C 07 2504 RMW 

designated as “Attorneys Eyes Only” on each page of the documents or similar notation on the 

data. Counsel of record receiving Confidential Information produced informally under this 

Section I shall not disclose it to the Stipulating Parties themselves, or to their employees or 

officers or to any third party or entity that is not one of the “Qualified Persons” referred to in 

paragraphs C(iii)-(vi) and (viii)-(ix), except as may be permitted by agreement of the Parties or 

order of the Court. No party may withhold or delay disclosure of non-privileged documents or 

information responsive to discovery requests or disclosure obligations in this action based on the 

procedures set forth in this Section I. 

J. In any applications and motions to the Court, certain materials designated as 

CONFIDENTIAL, including Confidential Information that has been produced “Subject to a 

Protective Order,” may be lodged, subject to in camera review or (if so ordered) filed with the 

Court in a sealed envelope or container on which shall be affixed the title of this action, an 

indication of the nature of their contents, the word "CONFIDENTIAL—SUBMITTED UNDER 

SEAL" and a statement substantially as follows: 

THIS ENVELOPE CONTAINS MATERIALS SUBJECT TO 

A STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED IN 

THIS ACTION. IT IS NOT TO BE OPENED NOR ARE ITS 

CONTENTS TO BE DISPLAYED, REVEALED OR MADE 

PUBLIC, EXCEPT BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

The submission shall be subject to the requirements of Northern District Civil Local Rule 79-5. 

K. This Stipulated Protective Order shall survive termination of this action. Upon 

final termination of the action, including appeals and retrials, and at the written request of any 

Stipulating Party, any material produced or served by that party and designated as Confidential 

Information or Attorneys’ Eyes Only information shall be returned to counsel for the disclosing 

Stipulating Party or, if such party is not represented by counsel, directly to the Stipulating Party. 

Such materials shall either be returned at the expense of the Designating Party or, at the option 

and expense of the Stipulating Party, destroyed. Upon request for the return or destruction of 

designated materials, counsel of record shall certify their compliance with this provision and shall 

deliver such certification to counsel for the disclosing Stipulating Party not more than 90 days 

after the written request to return or destroy designated materials. Notwithstanding the provisions 

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 6 of 10 Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 8 Filed 06/19/07 Page 6 of 10
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7564932.1 -7- STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C 07 2504 RMW 

for return or destruction of designated material, outside counsel of record may retain archival 

copies, in paper and/or electronic media, of pleadings, attorney and consultant work product, 

databases, deposition transcripts and exhibits containing designated material. 

L. After the date of this Stipulation, if a Stipulating Party through inadvertence 

produces or provides discovery of any Confidential Information without designating it as such in 

accordance with this Stipulation and Order, the disclosing Stipulating Party may give written 

notice to the other Stipulating Parties that have received the Confidential Information that the 

document(s), information, response, testimony, or other discovery are Confidential Information 

and should be treated as confidential in accordance with the provisions of this Stipulation. The 

Stipulating Parties that have received the materials must treat the materials as confidential from 

the date such notice is received. The inadvertent disclosure of any confidential document or 

information shall not be deemed a waiver of confidentiality as to any other document in which 

such information may be contained. 

M. The terms and provisions of this Stipulation are subject to modification, extension 

or limitation only as may be hereafter expressly agreed to in writing by the Stipulating Parties or 

by order of this Court. Each of the Stipulating Parties reserves all rights to apply to the Court for 

an order modifying this Stipulation or seeking further protection or disclosure regarding the 

subject matter of this Stipulation. 

N. The Stipulating Parties shall not file with the Court any deposition transcript or 

Document containing or otherwise disclosing Confidential Information unless the party seeking to 

file the confidential document: (1) files a motion to seal, pursuant to Local Court Rules 7-11 and 

79-5 of the Northern District of California and that said motion to seal shall be filed at the same 

time as or before the motion for which the confidential document is sought to be used; and (2) 

attempts to ensure that the confidential document is protected until the court resolves the motion 

to seal, by attempting to lodge the confidential document with the court rather than filing it with 

the court clerk. 

O. This Stipulation is intended to provide a mechanism for the Stipulating Parties to 

handle Confidential Information to which there is no objection to disclosure or production other 

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 7 of 10

PVT

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 8 Filed 06/19/07 Page 7 of 10
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7564932.1 -8- STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C 07 2504 RMW 

than confidentiality. Any Third Party who is subpoenaed or otherwise compelled to participate in 

this case shall have the right to elect to have the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order and its 

protections apply to it and the Confidential Information to which is sought from the Third Party. 

P. If a Stipulating Party wishes to designate as "CONFIDENTIAL" materials 

produced by someone other than that Stipulating Party, such designation shall be made: 

(a) within fourteen days (14) from the date that the Stipulating Party receives copies of the 

materials from the producing or disclosing entity; and (b) by notice to all other parties to this 

action and to the Producing Party, if such party is not a party to this action, identifying the 

materials to be designated with particularity (either by production numbers or by providing other 

adequate identification of the specific material). Such notice shall be sent by facsimile and 

regular mail. Upon notice of such designation, all other parties receiving notice of the requested 

designation of materials shall: make no further disclosure of such Designated Material or 

information contained therein, except as allowed in this Stipulated Protective Order; take 

reasonable steps to notify any persons to whom the other parties may have disclosed Designated 

Materials of the effect of such designation under this Stipulated Protective Order; and take 

reasonable steps to reclaim from or prevent access by others to whom the other parties may have 

disclosed Designated Material or information and who are not permitted to have access under the 

terms of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

Q. The Stipulating Parties agree that in the event the Court does not execute this 

Stipulation and Order for any reason whatsoever, this document shall nevertheless constitute a 

binding stipulation between them and shall remain in full force and effect. Each of the 

Stipulating Parties agrees to cooperate fully in obtaining the Court’s approval and execution of 

this Stipulation. 

R. This Stipulation and Order shall not preclude disclosure of Confidential 

Information to the Court having jurisdiction over the action, including the trier of fact at the time 

of trial. This Stipulation shall not preclude or affect the offering or receipt of evidence at trial. 

The parties reserve all rights to apply to the Court for protection with respect to the 

confidentiality of testimony or other evidence at trial. 

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 8 of 10 Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 8 Filed 06/19/07 Page 8 of 10
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7564932.1 -9- STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C 07 2504 RMW 

S. Neither the taking of any action in accordance with the provisions of this 

Stipulation and Order, nor the failure to object thereto, shall be construed as a waiver of any claim 

defense, or objection. The entry of this Stipulation and Order shall not be construed as a waiver 

of the right to object to the furnishing of information or documents in response to discovery and 

the Stipulating Parties expressly reserve their right to withhold information or documents on the 

basis of such objections. 

T. The Stipulating Parties, and any other person subject to the terms of this 

Stipulation and Order, agree that after this Action is terminated, this Court shall have and retain 

jurisdiction over him, her, or it for the purpose of enforcing this Stipulation and Order. 

U. In the event of any dispute over the terms of this Stipulation and Order, the Parties 

stipulate and agree that no part of this Stipulation and Order shall be construed against any 

Stipulating Party on the basis of authorship. 

V. Official Court employees are not bound by the terms of this Stipulation except to 

the extent of normal court procedures and applicable laws for documents filed under seal. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 18, 2007 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

By /s/ 

Brendan Dolan 

Attorneys for Plaintiff POSDATA CO., LTD.

Dated: June 18, 2007 SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLP 

By /s/ 

David S. Elkins 

Attorneys for Defendants SEYOUNG KIM 

and INQUADRON, INC. 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

Hon. RONALD M. WHYTE 

United States District Judge 

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 9 of 10

June 19, 2007 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 8 Filed 06/19/07 Page 9 of 10
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7564932.1 -10- STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C 07 2504 RMW 

Exhibit A 

Written Assurances 

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I have read the attached Stipulated Protective Order 

entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, entitled 

Posdata, Co. LTD. v. Seyoung Kim, et al,, Case No. 07-2504 RMW. I understand the terms of 

this Stipulated Protective Order. I agree to be bound by such terms and to submit to the personal 

jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with respect 

to any proceeding related to the enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order, including any 

proceedings related to contempt of Court. I will use Designated Material marked 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” only in the trial and preparation for trial 

of this action and will not disclose any such Designated Material to anyone other than persons 

specially authorized by the Order and agree to return all such Designated Material which come 

into my possession to counsel from whom I received such Designated Material. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Name of Individual:_____________________________________________________________ 

Company or Firm:______________________________________________________________ 

Address:______________________________________________________________________ 

Telephone No.:_________________________________________________________________ 

Relationship to this action and its parties: ___________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

Dated:____________________ ____________________________________ 

 Signature 

Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 7 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 10 of 10 Case 5:07-cv-02504-RMW Document 8 Filed 06/19/07 Page 10 of 10