Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01563/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01563-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANGELA CRUZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MM 879, INC., et al., 

Defendants.

No. 1:15-cv-01563-TLN-EPG

ORDER

The Court has read and considered Plaintiffs Angela Cruz, Maria Madrigal, Lourdes Baiz, 

and Christine Goodman’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 54(b) and for a Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal. 

(ECF No. 196.) Defendants ServiceMaster Company, LLC (“ServiceMaster”), Merry Maids, LP

(“Merry Maids”), and MM Maids, LLC (“MM Maids”) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a 

statement of non-opposition. (ECF No. 199.) 

The Court previously granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants Barrett Business 

Services, Inc. (“BBSI”), ServiceMaster, Merry Maids, and MM Maids and dismissed those 

Defendants from the instant action. (See ECF Nos. 162, 182, 191, 192.) The only remaining 

Defendant is MM 879, Inc. (“MM 879”). Plaintiffs now move the Court to enter final judgment

as to its prior orders pursuant to Rule 54(b) and indicate their intent to file an immediate appeal 

once judgment is entered. (See generally ECF No. 196-1.) 

Case 1:15-cv-01563-TLN-EPG Document 201 Filed 05/18/21 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Good cause appearing and noting no opposition, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ 

motion. (ECF No. 196.) As set forth in this Court’s prior orders (ECF Nos. 162, 182, 191, 192), 

the Court GRANTS Defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment and DISMISSES 

BBSI, ServiceMaster, Merry Maids, and MM Maids from the action. There being no just reason 

for delay, this Judgment shall be final pursuant to Rule 54(b). Moreover, this action is hereby 

STAYED pending the resolution of Plaintiffs’ forthcoming appeal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 17, 2021

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge

Case 1:15-cv-01563-TLN-EPG Document 201 Filed 05/18/21 Page 2 of 2