Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-06326/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-06326-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ABHISHEK AGRAWAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

TERRAFORM GLOBAL, INC., et al.,

 Defendants.

----------------------------------------------------

ANTON S. BADRI,

Plaintiff,

v.

TERRAFORM GLOBAL, INC., et al.,

 Defendants.

----------------------------------------------------

SIMON FRASER,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRIAN WUEBBELS, et al.,

 Defendants.

----------------------------------------------------

IRON WORKERS MID-SOUTH PENSION 

FUND,

Plaintiff,

v.

TERRAFORM GLOBAL, INC., et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-06322-BLF 

Case No. 15-cv-06323-BLF

Case No. 15-cv-06326-BLF

Case No. 15-cv-06328-BLF

Case 5:15-cv-06326-BLF Document 29 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

MITESH PATEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

TERRAFORM GLOBAL, INC., et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-00073-BLF

ORDER ADOPTING PRIOR BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE RE MOTIONS FOR 

REMAND; AND SUBMITTING 

MOTIONS FOR REMAND WITHOUT 

ORAL ARGUMENT UPON 

COMPLETION OF BRIEFING

Prior to transfer of the above-titled actions to the undersigned judge, Defendants had filed 

motions for remand in each action, the previously assigned judge had set a briefing schedule on 

those motions, and the motions had been set for hearing on February 17, 2016.

The briefing schedule set by the previously assigned judge is hereby ADOPTED; in 

accordance with that schedule, reply briefs on the motions for remand shall be filed on or before 

February 10, 2016.

The undersigned judge has determined that the motions for remand are appropriate for 

disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The motions will be SUBMITTED 

without oral argument upon completion of briefing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2016

 ______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-06326-BLF Document 29 Filed 02/04/16 Page 2 of 2