Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05446/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05446-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- Case No. :15-cv-05446-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No.

 170151)

 David A. Perlson (Cal. Bar No. 209502)

 Michael D. Powell (Cal. Bar No. 202850)

 Derek J. Tang (Cal. Bar No. 4540514)

 Lindsay M. Cooper (Cal. Bar No. 287125)

 Felipe Corredor (Cal. Bar No. 295692)

 qe-eolas@quinnemanuel.com

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

(415) 875-6600

(415) 875-6700 facsimile

Attorneys for Plaintiff Google Inc.

Jennifer P. Estremera, SBN 251076

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510

Redwood Shores, California 94065

Tel: (650) 394-1414; Fax: (650) 394-1422

jestremera@mckoolsmith.com

John B. Campbell, TX SBN 24036314 

(admitted Pro Hac Vice)

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

300 West 6th Street, Suite 1700

Austin, Texas 78701

Tel. (512) 692-8700; Fax: (512) 692-8744 

jcampbell@mckoolsmith.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Eolas Technologies Incorporated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GOOGLE INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES 

INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-05446-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME TO RESPOND TO EOLAS 

TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS GOOGLE INC.’S 

COMPLAINT

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Case 4:15-cv-05446-JST Document 51 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- Case No. :15-cv-05446-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Google Inc. (“Google”) and 

Defendant Eolas Technologies Incorporated (“Eolas”), by and through their respective attorneys, 

hereby submit the following Joint Stipulation, as follows:

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2015, Google served its complaint upon Eolas;

WHEREAS, on December 4, 2015, this Court set the Case Management Conference for 

February 23, 2016;

WHEREAS, on December 15, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the deadline 

for Eolas to answer or otherwise respond to Google’s complaint to January 21, 2016;

WHEREAS, on January 5, 2016, this Court granted the parties’ stipulation;

WHEREAS, on January 20, 2016, Google filed a first amended complaint;

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2016, this Court reset the Case Management Conference for 

February 24, 2016;

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2016, Eolas filed a motion to dismiss Google’s complaint, 

scheduled for hearing by this Court on April 21, 2016;

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2016, Eolas filed an administrative motion for relief from the 

notice and order setting initial Case Management Conference, for continuance of the Case 

Management Conference, and to stay any discovery;

WHEREAS, on February 17, 2016, this Court granted in part and denied in part Eolas’s 

administrative motion, resetting the Case Management Conference for April 21, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and agreed to extend Google’s time to oppose 

Eolas’s motion to dismiss Google’s complaint, currently set for February 22, 2016, and Eolas’s 

time to file a reply in support of said motion to dismiss, currently set for February 29, 2016;

WHEREAS, no other deadlines will be affected;

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND THE PARTIES JOINTLY 

REQUEST that the deadline for Google to respond to Eolas’s motion to dismiss be extended by 

eleven days to March 4, 2016, and that the deadline for Eolas to reply be extended to March 14, 

2016.

Case 4:15-cv-05446-JST Document 51 Filed 02/23/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3- Case No. :15-cv-05446-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

DATED: February 22, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

By /s David A. Perlson

 David A. Perlson

Attorneys for Google Inc.

McKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.

By /s John B. Campbell

 John B. Campbell

Attorneys for Eolas Technologies Incorporated

Case 4:15-cv-05446-JST Document 51 Filed 02/23/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4- Case No. :15-cv-05446-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I, David A. Perlson, am the ECF user whose userid and password authorized the filing 

of this document. Under Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that John B. Campbell has concurred in 

this filing.

DATED: February 22, 2016

/s/ David A. Perlson

David A. Perlson

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff Google Inc. and Defendant Eolas Technologies Incorporated have stipulated to 

extend the deadline for Google’s opposition to Eolas’s motion to dismiss Google’s complaint until 

March 4, 2016 and the deadline for Eolas’s reply until March 14, 2016.

The requested extension is GRANTED. Google’s opposition to Eolas’s motion to dismiss 

Google’s complaint will be filed no later than March 4, 2016, and Eolas’s reply will be filed no 

later than March 14, 2016.

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ___________________, 2016

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge

February 23

Case 4:15-cv-05446-JST Document 51 Filed 02/23/16 Page 4 of 4