Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00356/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00356-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALENCIA ANN THOMPSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CITY OF FRESNO, N. ROBEY (F.P.D. )

Badge No. P1303), CAMPOS (F.P.D. )

Badge No. 1067), LOPEZ (F.D.P. Badge )

No. 1309), M. GEBHART (F.D.P. Badge )

No. 1245), EDROZO (F.D.P. Badge No. )

1111), A. ROBLES (F.D.P. Badge No. )

5142), GOMEZ (F.P.D. Badge No. UNK.), )

D. LAMBERT (F.D.P. Badge No. P742), )

In their Official Capacities, and in their )

Individual Capacities, and DOES 1 )

through 50, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F 06-00356 AWI LJO

ORDER VACATING

HEARING DATE OF

SEPTEMBER 26, 2006, AND

TAKING MATTER UNDER

SUBMISSION

On August 4, 2006, defendants City of Fresno, et al. (“Defendants”) noticed for

hearing and decision a motion to dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6). The matter was

scheduled for oral argument to be held on September 8, 2006. The matter was subsequently

rescheduled for oral argument to be held on September 25, 2006. 

The court has reviewed Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff’s response and Defendant’s

reply and has determined that Defendants’ motion to dismiss is suitable for decision without

oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h). Should the court later determine upon review of all

submitted documents that oral argument is appropriate, the parties will be notified and the

Case 1:06-cv-00356-LJO-GSA Document 21 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

matter will be scheduled for oral argument.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of

September 25, 2006, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of the latter of

September 25, 2006, the court will take the matter under submission and will thereafter

render a decision or request further briefing or schedule oral argument as appropriate in

accordance with Local Rule 78-230(h).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 21, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

h2ehf UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00356-LJO-GSA Document 21 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 2