Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03617/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03617-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN COURTROOM

CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

 David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758) 

 Albert P. Bedecarré (Bar No. 148178) 

 Diane Doolittle (Bar No. 142046) 

 Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927) 

 Emily C. O’Brien (Bar No. 240072) 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

 davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com 

 albedecarre@quinnemanuel.com 

 dianedoolittle@quinnemanuel.com 

 carlanderson@quinnemanuel.com 

 emilyobrien@quinnemanuel.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Siliconix incorporated

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

 Jack Q. Lever (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

 Shamita D. Etienne (State Bar No. 202090) 

 Peter P. Chen (Bar No. 111426) 

 Bijal V. Vakil (Bar No. 192878) 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1212 

Telephone: 650.813.5000 

Facsimile: 650.813.5100 

 jlever@mwe.com 

 setienne@mwe.com 

 pchen@mwe.com 

 bvakil@mwe.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. and 

Panasonic Corporation of North America 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SILICONIX INCORPORATED, 

a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

DENSO CORPORATION, a Japanese 

corporation, and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC., 

a Michigan corporation, 

 Defendants. 

AND CONSOLIDATED ACTION NO. 

C 05-03617 WHA. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER PERMITTING USE OF 

EQUIPMENT IN COURTROOM 

Judge: The Honorable William H. Alsup 

Date: September 21, 2006 

Time: 8:00 a.m. 

Ctrm: 9, 19th Floor 

Case 3:05-cv-03617-WHA Document 54 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:05-cv-03617-WHA Document 55 Filed 09/20/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50630/1959824.1 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN COURTROOM

CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

STIPULATION

It is hereby stipulated by and between Siliconix incorporated (“Siliconix”) Matsushita 

Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Corporation of North America (collectively 

“Matsushita”) through their respective counsel of record, and respectfully requested that the Court 

grant the following: 

 WHEREAS during the summary judgment hearing scheduled to take place on September 

21, 2006 Siliconix and Matsushita intend to utilize certain audiovisual and electrical equipment to 

present information to the Court regarding the issues involved in this action. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

 1. For purposes of the summary judgment hearing on September 21, 2006, Siliconix 

and Matsushita may bring the following equipment and other items into the courtroom: 

 (a) VCR and/or laser disc equipment; 

 (b) video monitors; 

 (c) a projector and a projection screen; 

 (d) high resolution ELMO document camera; 

 (e) laptop and/or desktop computers; 

 (f) control and power devices relating to the above equipment; 

 (g) miscellaneous cables, power cords, and peripheral equipment; 

 (h) oversized demonstrative exhibits; 

 (i) exhibit easels; and 

 (j) equipment carts. 

 2. Beginning at 7:00 a.m. on September 21, 2006, Siliconix and Matsushita may have 

access to the courtroom to set up the above equipment so that the parties will be prepared to 

proceed with the summary judgment hearing at its scheduled time of 8:00 a.m. 

Case 3:05-cv-03617-WHA Document 54 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:05-cv-03617-WHA Document 55 Filed 09/20/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50630/1959824.1 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING USE OF EQUIPMENT IN COURTROOM

CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

DATED: September 19, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

 OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

 By /s/ David Eiseman 

 David Eiseman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Siliconix incorporated 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: September_____, 2006 ___________________________ 

 The Honorable William H. Alsup 

 United States District Judge 

DATED: September 19, 2006 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

 By /s/ John Gilmore 

 John Gilmore 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. and 

Panasonic Corporation of North America 

Case 3:05-cv-03617-WHA Document 54 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 3 of 3

20

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:05-cv-03617-WHA Document 55 Filed 09/20/06 Page 3 of 3