Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-02000/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-02000-92/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MPS’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL ADDITIONAL 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION

C 04-2000 CW (EDL)

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., 

a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

O2 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, 

a Cayman Islands corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 04-2000 CW (EDL) 

[CONSOLIDATED WITH C 06-2929] 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL ADDITIONAL 

30(B)(6) DEPOSITION

Date: April 17, 2007 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Location: Courtroom E, 15th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS AND 

CROSS-CLAIMS. 

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 902 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 919 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MPS’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL ADDITIONAL 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION

C 04-2000 CW (EDL)

The Court, having considered Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Compel 

Additional 30(b)(6) Deposition of O2 Micro, O2 Micro’s opposition, and oral argument, hereby 

GRANTS MPS’s motion. 

Within five business days, O2 Micro shall provide a declaration from its Legal 

Department signed under penalty of perjury regarding the investigation that was done by the 

company in response to the Rule 30(b)(6) Notice. This declaration shall include, but not be 

limited to, an identification of each individual spoken to and the information known, if any, by 

that individual. The provision of this declaration of O2 Micro’s Legal Department shall not effect 

a waiver of the company’s attorney-client privilege with its counsel. 

Additionally, O2 Micro shall have its Legal Department contact Steve Lee and C.C. Kuo 

and ask them what knowledge they have concerning the sale of (or offer to sell) O2 Micro preIPO stock to customers with whom they were supporting during the relevant timeframe or their 

employees. If Mr. Lee and Mr. Kuo have no knowledge or recollection concerning such matters, 

then O2 Micro may so state in the declaration from its Legal Department. If Mr. Lee and/or Mr. 

Kuo have knowledge concerning such matters, then the parties shall confer regarding the most 

efficient means of disclosing this knowledge in discoverable form, such as in an in-person 

deposition, telephonic deposition, or deposition by written questions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________________, 2007 _______________________________ 

Elizabeth D. Laporte 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 902 Filed 04/23/2007 Page 2 of 2

April 26

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 919 Filed 04/26/07 Page 2 of 2