Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00099/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00099-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANTE L. BLOXTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0099 MCE GGH P

vs.

E.J. CANTU, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed June 6, 2006, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return

to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant

Rayburn. That sixty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to

the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Rayburn be dismissed from

this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:06-cv-00099-MCE -GGH Document 14 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 9/11/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

blox0099.fusm

Case 2:06-cv-00099-MCE -GGH Document 14 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 2