Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00882/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00882-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FLOYD LOWE,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-02-0882 LKK GGH P

vs.

A. K. SCRIBNER, Warden, et al.,

 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, has filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order

No. 262.

On May 9, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. On May 26, 2006, petitioner

was granted until June 30, 2006, in which to file his objections. Petitioner has filed objections to

the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

Case 2:02-cv-00882-LKK -GGH Document 28 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 9, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

DATED: August 28, 2006.

Case 2:02-cv-00882-LKK -GGH Document 28 Filed 08/29/06 Page 2 of 2