Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01149/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01149-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRIST A. HANNA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JOE MADDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-01149-REC-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Docs. 7 & 8),

DISMISSING ACTION, AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff, Christ A. Hanna (“plaintiff”), proceeding pro se,

has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On December 5, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation which were served on plaintiff and which contained

notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and

Recommendation were to be filed within twenty (20) days. On

January 24, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation which were served on plaintiff and which contained

notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and

Case 1:05-cv-01149-REC-DLB Document 9 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Recommendation were to be filed within fifteen (15) days. To 

date, plaintiff has not filed objections to these

recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed December 5, 2005

and on January 24, 2006 are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action is DISMISSED; and 

3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01149-REC-DLB Document 9 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2