Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01576/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01576-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1576 DFL EFB P

vs.

JOSEPH BICK, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On August 8, 2006, plaintiff filed a document entitled “Motion to Set Aside and

Relieve Plaintiff from this Court’s Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of the Cutoff

Date for Discovery . . .,” which the court construes as a request for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order filed July 20, 2006. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate

judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the

entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, plaintiff’s August 8, 2006, motion is

construed as a motion for reconsideration, and so construed, is denied. The order of the

magistrate judge filed July 20, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: March 29, 2007

/s/ David F. Levi 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01576-GEB-EFB Document 53 Filed 03/30/07 Page 1 of 1