Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-16-01615/USCOURTS-ca8-16-01615-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1615

___________________________

Robert Earl Clayborne, Jr.,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

Lancanster County; Lancaster County Jail Director, individually and in their

official capacity jointly and severally; Lancaster County Medical Director,

individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; Lancaster County

Correct Care Solutions Medical Department; Mary Howell, Lancaster County

Correct Care Solutions Mental Health Practitioner, individually and in their official

capacity jointly,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants,

Christopher Eickholt, Lancaster County Public Defender/Court Official,

individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; Lori Pasold,

Lancaster County Attorney, individually and in their official capacity jointly and

severally; Stephanie Stacy, Lancaster County District Court Judge, individually

and in their official capacity jointly and severally,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees,

Patrick F. Condon, Lancaster County Chief Deputy County Attorney, individually

and in their official capacity jointly and severally; State of Nebraska,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants.

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________

Appellate Case: 16-1615 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2016 Entry ID: 4433278 
 Submitted: July 22, 2016

Filed: August 3, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Robert Clayborne, Jr. appeals the district court’s1

 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)

dismissal of his pro se complaint asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his

serious medical needs, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a claim of disability

discrimination, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Upon careful de novo

review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we

conclude that the dismissal was proper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

-2-

Appellate Case: 16-1615 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/03/2016 Entry ID: 4433278