Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05967/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05967-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUCIOUS EDWARD JACKSON, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SGT. GUTIERREZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05967-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 8)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff, Lucious Edward Jackson, Jr. (“plaintiff”), a

state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 14, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days. To

date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

//

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

Case 1:04-cv-05967-LJO -SMS Document 13 Filed 06/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed April 14, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim,

and the claim against defendant Scribner under the theory of

supervisory liability, are DISMISSED from this action; and,

3. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for

further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05967-LJO -SMS Document 13 Filed 06/15/05 Page 2 of 2