Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-02428/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-02428-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 08cv2428

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CURTIS E. MILLER,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 08cv2428 DMS (PCL)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

[Docket No. 33]

vs.

T. CATLETT; A. AMAT,

Defendants.

This case comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of this Court’s

February 1, 2010 Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss.

Specifically, Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Court’s decision to dismiss his state law claim with

prejudice. Defendants have filed an opposition to the motion, and Plaintiff has filed a reply. 

“Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered

evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an

intervening change in controlling law.” School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Oregon v. ACandS,

Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). Plaintiff has not shown that any of these circumstances is

present in this case. Accordingly, his motion for reconsideration is denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 20, 2010

HON. DANA M. SABRAW

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02428-AJB-PCL Document 49 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 1