Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02353/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02353-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEALDASH OYJ, et. al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CONTEXTLOGIC INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 18-2353 MMC (JCS)

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S ORDER DENYING MOTION

TO COMPEL

Before the Court is defendant ContextLogic Inc.’s (“ContextLogic”) “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Order Denying Motion to Compel,” filed April 12, 2019. 

Having fully considered the matter, the Court hereby DENIES the Objections, for the

reason that ContextLogic has failed to show the subject order is clearly erroneous or

contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (providing district court may reconsider

magistrate judge’s order where it has been shown to be “clearly erroneous or contrary to

law”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 23, 2019 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:18-cv-02353-MMC Document 134 Filed 04/23/19 Page 1 of 1