Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00640/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00640-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT NITZKE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0640 DFL KJM PS

vs.

TRINITY COUNTY BOARD OF

SUPERVISORS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed May 2, 2006, this court directed plaintiff to submit, within twenty

days, the appropriate filing fee. Twenty days have since passed, and plaintiff has not submitted

the appropriate filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS

HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed. See Local Rule 11-110.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00640-RRB -KJM Document 5 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 12, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00640-RRB -KJM Document 5 Filed 06/13/06 Page 2 of 2