Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05422/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05422-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EMBLAZE LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 12-cv-05422-JST 

ORDER RE JOINT MOTION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Re: ECF No. 104

Now before the Court is the parties’ joint motion for protective order. The parties have 

agreed on the terms of a protective order, except for two issues (spread over three paragraphs). 

This order resolves those issues as follows:

1. The Court adopts Microsoft’s proposed Paragraph 9(c). Emblaze shall produce 

source code for inspection at the office of its outside counsel in New York, New York.

2. The Court adopts Microsoft’s proposed Paragraph 9(d)(iv), with one modification: 

the phrase “, except as provided in Paragraph 9(d)(vi)” shall be inserted after the words 

“recordable device.” The sentence in question will then read, “The Receiving Party shall not 

copy, remove, transcribe, or otherwise transfer any source code from the Source Code Computer 

including, without limitation, copying, removing, or transferring the source code onto any other 

computers, peripheral equipment, recordable media, or recordable device, except as provided in 

Paragraph 9(d)(vi).” 

3. The court adopts Emblaze’s proposed Paragraph 9(d)(vi). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 25, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:12-cv-05422-JST Document 125 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 1