Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04308/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04308-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs CRAIG YATES

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CRAIG YATES, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES:HELPING

YOU HELP OTHERS, a California public

benefit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ASSOCIATED MAIN STREET

PARTNERS, a California limited

partnership; SHAHRAM ASSABBI, an

individual; and KMK MANAGEMENT

COMPANY,

Defendants. ___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-4308 BZ

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”) herein, each party is to bear its

own costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511

U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of

settlement agreements).

Case 3:04-cv-04308-BZ Document 23 Filed 06/29/2005 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:04-cv-04308-BZ Document 24 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: June 29, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ 

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorney for Plaintiffs CRAIG YATES and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS

Dated: June 24, 2005

By: /s/

Michael Abbassi

Agent for Defendants ASSOCIATED MAIN

STREET PARTNERS and KMK MANAGEMENT

COMPANY

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: _____________, 2005

Hon. Bernard Zimmerman

UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-04308-BZ Document 23 Filed 06/29/2005 Page 2 of 2

June 30

Case 3:04-cv-04308-BZ Document 24 Filed 06/30/05 Page 2 of 2