Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-02218/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-02218-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

9956896.1 STIP. EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

1:09-CV-02218-LJO-GSA 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

MARC T.G. DWORSKY (State Bar No. 157413) Marc.Dworsky@mto.com 

LAWRENCE C. BARTH (State Bar No. 123002) Lawrence.Barth@mto.com 

JOSHUA P. GROBAN (State Bar No. 200095) Joshua.groban@mto.com@mto.com 

355 South Grand Avenue 

Thirty-Fifth Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 

Telephone: (213) 683-9100 

Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 

Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 

KENNETH AND GWEN BAIN, 

et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

WELLS FARGO BANK, 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO.: 1:09-cv-02218-LJO-GSA

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case 1:09-cv-02218-LJO-GSA Document 13 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

9956896.1 1 

STIP. EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

1:09-CV-02218-LJO-GSA 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the 

undersigned, subject to approval by the Court, that: 

WHEREAS, the Complaint in this action was served on Defendant 

The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNYM”) on December 29, 2009; 

WHEREAS, the Complaint in this action was served on Defendant 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) on or about December 24, 

2009; 

WHEREAS, by stipulation dated on or about January 20, 2010, the 

parties agreed to extend the Defendants’ time to respond to the Complaint for a 

period of no greater than twenty-eight days until on or before February 16, 2010; 

WHEREAS, on February 4, 2010, Defendants filed a joint petition 

with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“MDL Panel”) requesting that 

centralized pretrial proceedings take place in the instant action and five other 

actions currently pending in the Central District of California (“Joint Petition”); 

WHEREAS, Defendants expect their Joint Petition to be heard by the 

MDL Panel on March 25, 2010, which is the next tentatively-scheduled sitting of 

the MDL Panel; 

WHEREAS, on February 12, 2010, Defendants filed a joint ex parte

application seeking an extension of time to respond to the Complaint in the instant 

action until thirty days after the MDL Panel rules on Defendants Joint Petition; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs now have agreed to the relief sought by 

Defendants in their ex parte application; 

THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and 

between the parties, through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: 

Defendants BNYM and Wells Fargo’s time to respond to the 

Complaint shall be extended until thirty days after the MDL Panel rules on 

Case 1:09-cv-02218-LJO-GSA Document 13 Filed 02/16/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

9956896.1 - 2 - 

STIP. EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

1:09-CV-02218-LJO-GSA 

Defendants’ joint petition requesting the transfer of this action for pretrial 

proceedings to the Central District of California. 

DATED: February 16, 2010 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

MARC T.G. DWORSKY 

LAWRENCE C. BARTH 

JOSHUA P. GROBAN 

By: /s/ Joshua P. Groban 

JOSHUA P. GROBAN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION 

DATED: February 16, 2010 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

JOEL A. FEUER 

By: /s/ Joel A. Feuer 

JOEL A. FEUER 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE BANK OF NEW YORK 

MELLON CORPORATION 

DATED: February 16, 2010 PERKINS, MANN & EVERETT

By: /s/ Douglas V. Thornton 

DOUGLAS V. THORNTON 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

DATED: February 16, 2010 By: /s/ Gary S. Austin__________

Hon. Gary S. Austin 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:09-cv-02218-LJO-GSA Document 13 Filed 02/16/10 Page 3 of 3