Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_08-cv-08132/USCOURTS-azd-3_08-cv-08132-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The Court notes that counsel filed the Motion for Extension of Time on the date set

by the Court as the deadline for the filing of the Response to the Motion to Dismiss. Counsel

is advised that the Court is generally not inclined to grant such motions and will not do so

again in the future. 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jesse Dupris

Plaintiff

v.

Selanhongva McDonald, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. 08-8132-PCT-PGR 08-8133-PCT-PGR 

 (CONSOLIDATED)

 ORDER

Upon consideration of the Parties’ Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to

Respond to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. 53),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING the Motion. (Doc. 53.) The Response is

now due on April 19, 2010 and the Reply is now due on May 7, 2010.1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counsel is advised that the briefs are to be newly

drafted briefs, not replicas of the previously filed briefs. Therein, counsel is advised to

address each and every issue addressed in the Motion and corresponding responsive briefs.

Furthermore, counsel is advised to cite to Ninth Circuit and Arizona law, and refrain from

citing to other jurisdictions unless the foregoing is unavailable. Finally, counsel is advised

that they must comply with the Local and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 25th day of March, 2010.

Case 3:08-cv-08132-PGR Document 54 Filed 03/25/10 Page 1 of 1