Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03039/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03039-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\3039\order1shorten.wpd

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LILIANA SOLIS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 THE REGIS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 05-03039 CRB

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is defendant’s ex parte motion for order shortening

time for hearing on motion for protective order. Civil Local Rule 6-3(a)(2) requires the

motion to describe “the efforts the party has made to obtain a stipulation to the time change.” 

Defendant’s motion does not contain any such description; indeed, it appears defendant has

not conferred with plaintiff at all, not even on whether plaintiff will voluntarily cease sending

the letters to which defendant objects. Accordingly, defendant’s ex parte motion is DENIED

without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2006 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-03039-CRB Document 114 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\3039\order1shorten.wpd 2

Case 3:05-cv-03039-CRB Document 114 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2