Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01899/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01899-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK ANTHONY, )

) 2:02-cv-1899-GEB-GGH-P

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER

v. )

)

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S )

DEPARTMENT AND DEPUTY HENRY, )

)

Defendants. )

)

On November 29, 2005, Defendant Deputy Todd Henry submitted

a sealed motion in paper format. Two declarations and a proposed

order accompanied the motion. The motion requests sealing of certain

information. The motion is denied because its content does not

justify granting it. 

Therefore, the Clerk’s Office is directed to return the

above-referenced motion, the two declarations and the proposed order

to Defendant Henry’s attorney. See United States v. Baez-Alcaino,

718 F. Supp. 1503, 1507 (M.D. Fla. 1989) (stating that when an in

camera review reveals that any document submitted under seal for such 

///

///

Case 2:02-cv-01899-GEB-GGH Document 97 Filed 12/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

review fails to meet the applicable standard for sealing, it should be

returned to the submitting party). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 7, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge 

Case 2:02-cv-01899-GEB-GGH Document 97 Filed 12/08/05 Page 2 of 2