Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02650/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02650-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Anthony J. Poidmore, Esq., SBN 51346 

LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY J. POIDMORE

A Professional Law Corporation 

1520 Eureka Road, Suite 101 

Roseville, CA 95661 

Telephone: (916) 787-1290 

Facsimile: (916) 787-1293 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, GEORGE SAVAGE 

UNITES STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GEORGE SAVAGE 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL GROUP, 

SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL 

FOUNDATION, LESLIE D. 

SACKSCHEWSKY, and PATRICK L. 

SNYDER 

 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO.: 2:13-CV-02650-JAM-DAD

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

Complaint Filed: December 20, 2013 

Trial Date: August 3, 2015 

 

 IT IS HEREBYSTIPULATED by the parties, Plaintiff GEORGE SAVAGE, M.D. and 

Defendants SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL GROUP, INC. and PATRICK L. SNYDER by and 

through their counsel of record, that this Court enter a dismissal of Plaintiff’s Complaint with 

prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), with each party to bear its own fees and costs. 

Case 2:13-cv-02650-JAM-DAD Document 63 Filed 07/29/15 Page 1 of 3
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: July 28, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY J. POIDMORE 

A Professional Law Corporation

By:___/s/ Anthony J. Poidmore_____________ 

 ANTHONY J. POIDMORE 

 Attorney for Plaintiff GEORGE SAVAGE, M.D. 

DATED: July 28, 2015 DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP 

By:___/s/_______________________________ 

 CARLA J. HARTLEY 

 Attorney for Defendants SUTTER GOULD 

 MEDICAL GROUP, INC. and PATRICK L. 

 SNYDER 

Case 2:13-cv-02650-JAM-DAD Document 63 Filed 07/29/15 Page 2 of 3
3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

 Pursuant to stipulation by the parties, the parties’ joint stipulation is GRANTED and this 

action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, with each party to 

bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 7/29/2015 

 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________ 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:13-cv-02650-JAM-DAD Document 63 Filed 07/29/15 Page 3 of 3