Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05511/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05511-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUTOFF

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05511-WHO

Bryan K. Anderson, SBN 170666

bkanderson@sidley.com

Ash Nagdev, SBN 259921

anagdev@sidley.com

Ryuk Park, SBN 298744

ryuk.park@sidley.com

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

1001 Page Mill Road, Building 1

Palo Alto, California 94304

Telephone: +1 650 565-7000

Facsimile: +1 650 565-7100

Philip W. Woo, SBN 196459

pwoo@sidley.com

Ezekiel L. Rauscher, SBN 269141

erauscher@sidley.com

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

555 California Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: +1 415 772-1200

Facsimile: +1 415 772-7400

Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:14-cv-05511-WHO 

Assigned to: Hon. William H. Orrick 

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING 

EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUTOFF

Case 3:14-cv-05511-WHO Document 220 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUTOFF

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05511-WHO

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC (“EON”) 

and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) by and through their counsel, file this Stipulation and Proposed 

Order Regarding Extension of Fact Discovery Cutoff.

WHEREAS, on November 30, 2015, the Court issued its Civil Pretrial Order setting the 

current schedule (see ECF No. 161);

WHEREAS, the parties require a short extension of fact discovery to complete responses to 

pending discovery and conduct requested fact depositions before the current Fact Discovery Cutoff 

(December 21, 2016) due to conflicts with the parties’ and witnesses’ schedules for the approaching 

holidays;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that such extension shall apply to discovery requests and 

deposition notices that have already been served or requested in writing, and that such extension 

shall not permit the parties to serve any new discovery requests or requests for deposition(s);

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree, subject to the Court’s approval, that:

(1) the Fact Discovery Cutoff for completing pending discovery requests shall be extended 

30 days from December 21, 2016 to January 20, 2017;

(2) as a result, the deadlines for fact discovery motions, expert disclosures, expert rebuttals, 

expert discovery cutoff, and expert discovery motions shall all be extended 30 days as shown in the 

Revised Schedule below;

(3) the dates for the pretrial conference and trial shall remain the same; and

(4) the Revised Schedule shown below shall be adopted for this case.

Event Current Schedule Revised Schedule

Fact discovery cutoff December 21, 2016 January 20, 2017

Deadline for fact discovery motions January 11, 2017 February 10, 2017

Expert disclosure January 11, 2017 February 10, 2017

Expert rebuttal February 13, 2017 March 15, 2017

Expert discovery cutoff March 13, 2017 April 12, 2017

Deadline for expert discovery motions March 27, 2017 April 26, 2017

Pretrial Conference September 25, 2017

2:00 p.m.

September 25, 2017

2:00 p.m.

Trial October 23, 2017

8:30 a.m.

October 23, 2017

8:30 a.m.

Case 3:14-cv-05511-WHO Document 220 Filed 12/12/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUTOFF

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05511-WHO

Dated: December 8, 2016

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: Bryan K. Anderson

Bryan K. Anderson, SBN 170666

bkanderson@sidley.com

Ash Nagdev, SBN 259921

anagdev@sidley.com

Ryuk Park, SBN 298744

ryuk.park@sidley.com

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

1001 Page Mill Road, Building 1

Palo Alto, California 94304

Philip W. Woo, SBN 196459

pwoo@sidley.com

Ezekiel L. Rauscher, SBN 269141

erauscher@sidley.com

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

555 California Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, California 94104

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC.

REED & SCARDINO LLP

By: Joshua G. Jones

Daniel R. Scardino

dscardino@reedscardino.com

Joshua G. Jones

jjones@reedscardino.com

Craig S. Jepson, SBN132150

cjepson@reedscardino.com

MICLEAN GLEASON LLP

David J. Miclean, SBN 115098

dmiclean@micleangleason.com

Carmen M. Aviles, SBN 251993

caviles@micleangleason.com

ATTORNEYS FOR EON CORP. IP 

HOLDINGS, LLC

Case 3:14-cv-05511-WHO Document 220 Filed 12/12/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUTOFF

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05511-WHO

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2016

THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Court Judge

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that concurrence in 

the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory above.

Dated: December 8, 2016 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: Bryan K. Anderson

Bryan K. Anderson, SBN 170666

bkanderson@sidley.com

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC.

Case 3:14-cv-05511-WHO Document 220 Filed 12/12/16 Page 4 of 4