Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06997/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06997-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1144(a) E.R.I.S.A supersedes state law employee benefits

---

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND EXPERT DISCOVERY 

 Case No. C 06-6997 JSW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY 

A Professional Law Corporation 

Richard C. Rybicki (CSB 160096) (rrybicki@dpf-law.com) 

Brandon R. Blevans (CSB 197281) (bblevans@dpf-law.com) 

Patrick B. Sutton (CSB 223186) (psutton@dpf-law.com) 

Marlo S. Cohen (CSB 247311) (mcohen@dpf-law.com) 

809 Coombs Street 

Napa, CA 94559 

Tel.: 707.252.7122 / Fax: 707.255.6876 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

GOLDEN GATE RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

GOLDEN GATE RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION, 

an incorporated non-profit trade association, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and 

Does 1 through 15, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________________ 

SAN FRANCISCO CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL; 

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION 

LOCAL 1021; SEIU UNITED HEALTHCARE 

WORKERS-WEST; and UNITE HERE! LOCAL 2, 

 Intervenor Defendants. 

Case No. C 06-6997 JSW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY 

RESPONSES AND EXPERT 

DISCOVERY 

 

Plaintiff Golden Gate Restaurant Association, defendant City and County of San Francisco, 

and Intervenor-Defendants stipulate as follows: 

/ / / 

Case 3:06-cv-06997-JSW Document 64 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:06-cv-06997-JSW Document 65 Filed 08/31/07 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND EXPERT DISCOVERY 

 Case No. C 06-6997 JSW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. On August 1, 2007, plaintiff Golden Gate Restaurant Association (“GGRA”) served 

Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents on defendant City and County of 

San Francisco and on the Intervenor-Defendants (“GGRA’s Current Discovery”). Responses 

to GGRA’s Current Discovery are due on August 31, 2007. 

2. The discovery cutoff and initial expert disclosure dates in this matter are August 31, 2007. 

3. Defendants requested that GGRA grant an extension of time to respond to discovery, and for 

initial expert disclosures, given the parties’ pending summary judgment motions. 

4. For these reasons, the parties stipulate that: 

a. Defendants’ time to respond to GGRA’s Current Discovery shall be extended to November 

19, 2007, or two weeks after the Court decides the parties’ summary judgment motions, 

whichever is first. 

b. Plaintiff’s time to move to compel responses or further responses, and production or further 

production, in response to GGRA’s Current Discovery shall be extended to two weeks after 

the defendants’ responses are due. 

c. Initial expert disclosures shall be extended to November 19, 2007, or two weeks after the 

Court decides the parties’ summary judgment motions, whichever is first. Expert 

discovery schedule shall follow the timing set by the Court in its initial scheduling order. 

Dated: August 30, 2007 By:___________/s/__________________________ 

PATRICK B. SUTTON 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

 GOLDEN GATE RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION 

Dated: August ___, 2007 By:____________/s/___________________________ 

VINCE CHHABRIA 

Attorney for Defendant 

 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

Dated: August ___, 2007 By: /s/ 

 STACEY LEYTON 

 Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendant 

 SAN FRANCISCO CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL, 

et al. 

Case 3:06-cv-06997-JSW Document 64 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:06-cv-06997-JSW Document 65 Filed 08/31/07 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND EXPERT DISCOVERY 

 Case No. C 06-6997 JSW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: , 2007 

 Hon. Jeffrey S. White 

 Judge, United Stated District Court 

Case 3:06-cv-06997-JSW Document 64 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 3 of 4

August 31

Case 3:06-cv-06997-JSW Document 65 Filed 08/31/07 Page 3 of 3