Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-00914/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-00914-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 04cv0914

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DERRICK RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 04cv0914-LAB (CAB)

ORDER DISMISSING

vs. COMPLAINT

GIURBINO, GRANNIS, CABRRERA,

THORNTON, JONES, LIZARREA,

RODRIGUEZ, FLOOD, CAMARGO,

METTLER, PERDOMO, COOK, et al.,

Defendants.

On November 16, 2006, the court denied prisoner civil rights plaintiff Derrick Richardson's

("Richardson") third request for an extension of time to file a First Amended Complaint. He had been

given a deadline of May 12, 2006 to file a First Amended Complaint in the court's April 13, 2006

Order dismissing his Complaint without prejudice. That Order expressly advised Richardson that

"[f]ailure to timely file a First Amended Complaint will result in dismissal of this action with

prejudice." Dkt No. 46 (emphasis added). On May 8, 2006, Richardson filed a request for a 90-day

extension of time to file his First Amended Complaint. Dkt No. 48. On July 19, 2006, he filed a

request for a 60-day extension of time. Dkt No. 50. By Order entered October 26, 2006, Judge

Bencivengo granted both requests, noting that he had already received all the additional time he had

requested, but giving him an additional month extension, to November 27, 2006, to file his First

Amended Complaint. Richardson was again expressly admonished: "Failure to timely file a First

Case 3:04-cv-00914-LAB-CAB Document 54 Filed 12/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 04cv0914

Amended Complaint will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice." Dkt No. 51 (emphasis

added). 

For the reasons discussed in this court's November 16, 2006 Order, the court denied his third

request for yet more time. Dkt No.53. The deadline of November 27, 2006 accordingly remained in

effect. The court admonished Richmond that if First Amended Complaint was not timely filed, the

court would enter an Order dismissing this case in its entirety, with prejudice. Richardson has not filed

a First Amended Complaint as of the date of this Order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

this case is dismissed in its entirety as to all claims and all parties, with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 12, 2006

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-00914-LAB-CAB Document 54 Filed 12/12/06 Page 2 of 2