Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01655/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01655-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 540
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ

Acting Assistant Attorney General

VINCENT M. GARVEY

Deputy Branch Director

TAMRA T. MOORE

Attorneys, Civil Division

U.S. Department of Justice

20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20530

Telephone: (202) 514-8095

Facsimile: (202) 616-8460

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

JEFFREY J. LODGE

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Courthouse

2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401

Fresno, California 93271

Telephone: (559) 497-4000

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

__________________________________________

)

PINNACLE ARMOR, INC., )

) 1:07-cv-01655-LJO-DLB

Plaintiff, )

) STIPULATION REGARDING

v. ) DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO 

) RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED

Defendant. ) COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED 

__________________________________________) ORDER

In light of this Court’s January 7, 2008 Order (Dkt. No. 14), denying Plaintiff’s Motion

for Preliminary Injunction, Plaintiff, Pinnacle Armor, Inc., and Defendants, United States

Department of Justice and the National Institute of Justice (collectively, “the NIJ”), by and

through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate pursuant to Local Rule 6-144(a), subject to the

approval of this Court, that the NIJ has until February 29, 2008, to respond to all of the claims set

forth in Plaintiff’s First Amended Verified Complaint (“FAVC”), filed December 4, 2007 (Dkt.

Case 1:07-cv-01655-LJO-SAB Document 16 Filed 01/17/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. 6). 

The parties seek this enlargement of time to determine the best way to proceed with this

litigation in a manner that conserves the parties’ and the court’s resources and time. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 9, 2008 /s/ 

GEORGE GINGO

Counsel for Plaintiff

Dated: January 9, 2008 /s/ Tamra T. Moore 

TAMRA T. MOORE

Counsel for Defendants

 ORDER

Based on the above stipulation of all parties to this action, the Court directs that the NIJ’s

response to all of the claims set forth in the Plaintiff’s First Amended Verified Complaint shall

be filed on or before February 29, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01655-LJO-SAB Document 16 Filed 01/17/08 Page 2 of 2