Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00695/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00695-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KING MWASI,

Plaintiff,

v.

CORCORAN STATE PRISON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-00695-DAD-JLT (PC)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

DEFENDANT DR. MAHONEY SHOULD NOT 

BE DIMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE 

TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER 

AND TO PROSECUTE THIS ACTION 

(Doc. 65)

21-DAY DEADLINE

The Third Amended Complaint was screened and found to state various cognizable claims 

for relief under section 1983. (Doc. 65.) On September 21, 2016, service documents were sent to 

Plaintiff which he was ordered to fill out and return for service on Defendants Dr. Mahoney, Dr. 

Blanchard, Urbano LCSW, Prince LCSW, Sgt. Holland, and guards Cordova, Torres, and J. 

Gomez. (Id.) Plaintiff was ordered to file the service documents within thirty days of the date of 

service of that order. (Id.) On October 19, 2016, service documents were received from Plaintiff 

for all of the above defendants, except Dr. Mahoney. (See Doc. 67.)

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:

1. Plaintiff SHALL show cause within 21 days of the date of service of this order 

why Defendant Dr. Mahoney and all claims against him should not be dismissed 

with prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s order and to 

prosecute this action; 

Case 1:13-cv-00695-DAD-JLT Document 68 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. In the alternative, Plaintiff may submit documents for service on Dr. Mahoney, or a 

notice of voluntary dismissal of Dr. Mahoney; 

3. The Clerk’s Office is directed to send Plaintiff a USM-285 form, one summons, a 

Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the 

Third Amended Complaint, filed on December 28, 2015 (Doc. 59); and

4. Plaintiff’s failure to respond to this order in the time provided will result in 

recommendation that Dr. Mahoney and all claims against him be dismissed 

with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 7, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00695-DAD-JLT Document 68 Filed 11/07/16 Page 2 of 2