Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-00469/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-00469-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

-1- 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

MODIFY POST-TRIAL BRIEFING DEADLINES CASE NO. 5:11-CV-0469-EJD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 

Patricia A. Welch (Cal. Bar No. 127889) 

305 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 857-1717 

Facsimile: (650) 857-1288 

Email: welch.patricia@dorsey.com 

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 

J. Thomas Vitt (pro hac vice) 

Shannon L. Bjorklund (pro hac vice) 

David A. Couillard (pro hac vice) 

Suite 1500, 50 South Sixth Street 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 

Telephone: (612) 340-2600 

Facsimile: (612) 340-2868 

Email: vitt.thomas@dorsey.com bjorklund.shannon@dorsey.com couillard.david@dorsey.com 

ANDREWS KURTH LLP 

Paul D. Ackerman (pro hac vice) 

450 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10017 

Telephone: (212) 850-2858 

Facsimile: (212) 813-8148 

Email: PaulAckerman@andrewskurth.com 

Andrew Leibnitz (State Bar No. 184723)

aleibnitz@fbm.com 

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 954-4400 

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 

David W. Harlan (pro hac vice) 

Richard L. Brophy (pro hac vice) 

Mark A. Thomas (pro hac vice) 

Zachary C. Howenstine 

dharlan@armstrongteasdale.com rbrophy@armstrongteasdale.com mathomas@armstrongteasdale.com zhowenstine@armstrongteasdale.com ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP 

7700 Forsyth Blvd. Suite 1800 

St. Louis, MO 63105 

Telephone: (314) 621-5070 

Facsimile: (314) 621-5065 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff

OPTUMINSIGHT, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim 

Defendant, 

vs. 

OPTUMINSIGHT, INC., 

Defendant/Counterclaim 

Plaintiff. 

CASE NO. 5:11-CV-0469-EJD 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO MODIFY POST-TRIAL 

BRIEFING DEADLINES

Case 5:11-cv-00469-EJD Document 388 Filed 05/06/15 Page 1 of 4
-2- 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

MODIFY POST-TRIAL BRIEFING DEADLINES CASE NO. 5:11-CV-0469-EJD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, and subject to the approval of the Court, Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim Defendant Cave Consulting Group, Inc. (“CCGroup”) and Defendant and 

Counterclaim Plaintiff OptumInsight, Inc. (“OptumInsight”), by their undersigned attorneys, hereby 

stipulate to modifying the post-trial briefing deadlines. 

WHEREAS, CCGroup filed its Motion Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2) and 35 U.S.C. § 285 

For Attorneys’ Fees (“Motion for Attorneys’ Fees”), (Dkt. 373), on April 20, 2015, and the deadline 

for OptumInsight to respond is May 4, 2015, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a); 

WHEREAS, CCGroup’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees is 24 pages long, and accompanied by 

13 exhibits; 

WHEREAS, CCGroup also filed a Bill of Costs on April 20, 2015, (Dkt. 374), and the 

deadline to file objections to CCGroup’s Bill of Costs is also May 4, 2015; 

WHEREAS, May 4, 2015, was also the deadline for OptumInsight to file its Renewed Motion 

for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Alternative Motion for a New Trial, which OptumInsight filed 

on April 29, 2015 (Dkt. 379); 

WHEREAS, counsel for both parties have conferred and agree that, due to the volume of 

post-trial briefing and the complexity of the issues involved, a modification to the post-trial briefing 

deadlines is necessary for the parties to fully and adequately present their arguments and authorities 

to assist the Court in its disposition of these issues; 

WHEREAS, these deadlines have not previously been amended; 

WHEREAS, the parties do not anticipate that these modifications will adversely affect the 

date of the scheduled post-trial hearing, which is set for June 24, 2015; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that, subject the approval of the 

Court: 

Case 5:11-cv-00469-EJD Document 388 Filed 05/06/15 Page 2 of 4
-3- 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

MODIFY POST-TRIAL BRIEFING DEADLINES CASE NO. 5:11-CV-0469-EJD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. OptumInsight’s response to CCGroup’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees shall be filed on May 

18, 2015; 

2. CCGroup’s Reply in support of CCGroup’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees shall be filed on 

June 1, 2015; 

3. CCGroup’s response to OptumInsight’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of 

Law and Alternative Motion for a New Trial shall be filed on May 27, 2015; and 

4. OptumInsight’s Reply in support of OptumInsight’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a 

Matter of Law and Alternative Motion for a New Trial shall be filed on June 10, 2015. 

DATED: May 1, 2015 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP

By: s/David A. Couillard 

David A. Couillard 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff 

OPTUMINSIGHT, INC.

DATED: May 1, 2015 ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP 

By: s/Richard L. Brophy 

Richard L. Brophy 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant 

CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 

Case 5:11-cv-00469-EJD Document 388 Filed 05/06/15 Page 3 of 4
-4- 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

MODIFY POST-TRIAL BRIEFING DEADLINES CASE NO. 5:11-CV-0469-EJD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROPOSED ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

5/6/2015

Case 5:11-cv-00469-EJD Document 388 Filed 05/06/15 Page 4 of 4