Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02611/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02611-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COREY COLEMAN GRAY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2611 DFL DAD P

vs.

JERRY CARDOZA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On January 13, 2006, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Objections to the Order

of Jan. 4, 2006 of Judge Magistrate Dale A. Drozd,” which is construed as a request for

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed January 4, 2006, ordering defendant

Woodford not to file a responsive pleading until further notice from the court. Pursuant to E.D.

Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or

contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-02611-RRB-DAD Document 36 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed January 5, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: 9/28/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02611-RRB-DAD Document 36 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2