Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-428/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-03561 WHA

ORDER RE ORACLE’S

PRÉCIS REQUEST TO

REPLY RE BILL OF COSTS

Oracle seeks leave to respond to the new arguments made in Google’s reply to Oracle’s

objections to its bill of costs. Oracle may file a response brief NOT TO EXCEED TEN PAGES by

JULY 22 AT NOON. Oracle’s brief must be limited to the arguments made for the first time in

Google’s brief; it should not revisit arguments Oracle already made in conjunction with its

original objections.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 19, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 2008 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 1