Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-95/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 05-CV-3148 MMC [JCS] 

[Proposed] Order Granting MEI's Unopposed Motion to Enlarge Time 

DEWEY BALLANTINE LLP 

1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2225 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

MEDIATEK, INC., OPPO DIGITAL, INC., and

MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL 

COMPUTER CORP., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC [JCS] 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

MATSUSHITA'S UNOPPOSED 

MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO

FILE PROOF OF SERVICE AND 

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION 

MEDIATEK, INC., 

Counterclaimant, 

v.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD. and PANASONIC CORPORATION 

OF NORTH AMERICA, 

Counterclaim Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Judge: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

The Court, having considered Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Matsushita Electric 

Industrial Co., Ltd.'s (“Matsushita”) Unopposed Motion to Enlarge Time to File Proof of Service 

and Supplemental Declaration, finds that the motion should be granted.

//

//

//

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1108 Filed 05/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Case No. 05-CV-3148 MMC [JCS] 

[Proposed] Order Granting MEI's Unopposed Motion to Enlarge Time 

DEWEY BALLANTINE LLP 

1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2225 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the May 11, 2007 deadline set forth in the Court's May 8 

order is extended to May 17, 2007. Matsushita shall file the following documents to comply 

with said order: 1) proof of service of the May 4 unopposed motion and the Court's May 8 order 

on ASUSTek and on each third-party who has designated as confidential material contained in 

any document Matsushita sought to file under seal; and 2) a supplemental declaration setting 

forth, as to each document Matsushita sought leave to file under seal in light of a designation by 

a third-party, the identity of the designating third-party or third-parties. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________, 2007 ____________________________________ 

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Court

May 18

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1108 Filed 05/18/07 Page 2 of 2