Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03057/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03057-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

Case No.: 5:15-cv-03057-EJD

ORDER CORRECTING ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND 

DISMISSING DEFENDANTS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SABRENA ALIAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC., et al. ,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:15-cv-03057-EJD 

ORDER CORRECTING ORDER 

DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW 

CAUSE AND DISMISSING

DEFENDANTS

On September 23, 2015, this court issued an order to show cause (“OSC”) pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requiring Plaintiff Sabrena Alias (“Plaintiff”) to prove that 

service of process had been completed on four defendants, namely TransUnion, LLC 

(“TransUnion”), GMAC Mortgage, LLC (“GMAC”), County Financial Services (“County 

Financial”), and Schools Financial Credit Union (“Schools Financial”). See Docket Item No. 27. 

Plaintiff filed a return to the order to show cause on September 30, 2015, wherein she provided 

certificates of service for GMAC and Schools Financial. As to TransUnion, Plaintiff stated she 

had attempted service but would re-attempt service at a new address. As to County Financial, 

Plaintiff represented that it has not been served and that Plaintiff would likely dismiss County 

Financial if further attempts at service were unsuccessful. See Docket Item No. 33.

After reviewing Plaintiff’s response, the court issued an order discharging the OSC as to 

GMAC and County Financial and dismissing TransUnion and Schools Financial. See Docket 

Item No. 34. The court has discovered, however, that this order contains an error. Since Plaintiff 

successfully proved service on Schools Financial, it should not have been dismissed for lack of 

service. In contrast, County Financial, which had not been served, should have been dismissed. 

Case 5:15-cv-03057-EJD Document 47 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:15-cv-03057-EJD

ORDER CORRECTING ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND 

DISMISSING DEFENDANTS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Accordingly, the prior order dismissing Schools Financial is VACATED and it is 

reinstated as a defendant. Since there is still not evidence that it has been served, County 

Financial is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m). 

Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on Schools Financial. Since it is the only

defendant remaining, the Case Management Conference scheduled for November 19, 2015, is 

CONTINUED to 10:00 a.m. on December 10, 2015. The parties shall file a Joint Case 

Management Conference Statement on or before December 3, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 10, 2015

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-03057-EJD Document 47 Filed 11/10/15 Page 2 of 2