Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06655/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06655-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6655

PIPER A. ROUNTREE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TAMMY BROWN,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

HAROLD CLARK; JOHN JABE; WENDY HOBBS; D. RADCLIFF-WALKER; T. 

COX; K. STAPLETON; D. CARTER; P. SOUKOP; MS. SWANN; S. HORN; 

V. BOOKER; GENE JOHNSON; MS. SNOW; J. BLAND,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief

District Judge. (7:11-cv-00572-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 5, 2015

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Piper A. Rountree, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE

Appeal: 15-6655 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/05/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6655 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/05/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Piper A. Rountree appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and her 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Rountree v. Brown, No. 

7:11-cv-00572-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2015; Mar. 26, 2015). 

We deny Rountree’s motion for transcripts at the government’s 

expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-6655 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/05/2015 Pg: 3 of 3