Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-02130/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-02130-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 690
Nature of Suit: Other Forfeiture and Penalty Suits
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700592217v1 - 1 - DECL OF V. GRANNEMAN RE ORDER OF DISMISSAL, 

CERTIFICATION OF FAILURE TO PAY SETTLEMENT 

AMOUNT AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DATE OF 

CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP *efiled 1/10/07

VERNON H. GRANNEMAN #83532 

DIANNE L. SWEENEY #187198 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1114 

Telephone: (650) 233-4500 

Facsimile: (650) 233-4545 

Attorneys for 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

REAL PROPERTY AT 

1) 7900 BALD EAGLE DRIVE, 

 PARK CITY, UTAH; AND 

2) 7871 REDTAIL COURT, 

 PARK CITY, UTAH, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 02-2130 JF 

DECLARATION OF VERNON H. 

GRANNEMAN RE SEPTEMBER 29, 

2006 ORDER OF DISMISSAL, 

CERTIFICATION OF FAILURE TO 

PAY SETTLEMENT AMOUNT AND 

REQUEST TO EXTEND DATE OF 

CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 

I, Vernon H. Granneman, declare: 

1. I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of 

California, am admitted to the Bar of this Court and am a member of the law firm Pillsbury 

Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, attorneys for Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) in the above-captioned 

matter. The following declaration is based on my personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, 

I could and would testify competently to the matters stated herein. 

2. On September 29, 2006, the Court entered an Order of Dismissal in the abovecaptioned matter, conditioned on full satisfaction of a settlement agreed to between and among 

Case 5:02-cv-02130-JF Document 50 Filed 01/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 The Order of Dismissal is extended to 4/5/07. It is so ordered. 

16 

17 Dated: 1/5/07 _______________________

18 Jeremy Fogel, U.S. District Judge

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700592217v1 - 2 - DECL OF V. GRANNEMAN RE ORDER OF DISMISSAL, 

CERTIFICATION OF FAILURE TO PAY SETTLEMENT 

AMOUNT AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DATE OF 

CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 

the interested parties. Per the terms of the Order, this declaration constitutes certification on 

behalf of Cisco that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over. 

3. Although the Order provides that upon the filing of this certification within 90 

days of the date of the original Order, the Order of Dismissal “SHALL STAND VACATED and 

this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial,” Cisco proposes that the 

Court extend the Order of Dismissal an additional 60 to 90 days on the same terms and conditions 

as the original Order in the hope that the parties will be able to conclude the settlement. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on 

December 28, 2006 at Palo Alto, California. 

 /s/ Vernon H. Granneman 

 Vernon H. Granneman 

Case 5:02-cv-02130-JF Document 50 Filed 01/10/07 Page 2 of 2