Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-6_05-cv-06045/USCOURTS-arwd-6_05-cv-06045-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HOT SPRINGS DIVISION

PHYLLIS & G.W. DELANEY PLAINTIFFS

V. Civil No. 05-6045

GARY ASHCRAFT, et al. DEFENDANTS

O R D E R

Now on this 4th day of May 2007, there comes on for

consideration the report and recommendation issued by the Honorable

Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas. (Doc. 296). Also before the Court are

Plaintiffs’ written objection to the report and recommendation.

(Docs. 297-98).

The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and

sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and

recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its

entirety. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment (Doc. 279)

filed by Separate Defendants the City of Hot Springs, Arkansas;

Gary Ashcraft and Paul Norris is GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ claims

against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, Plaintiffs’

Motion to Serve Subpoenas for Trial (Doc. 291) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Robert T. Dawson

Honorable Robert T. Dawson

United States District Judge

Case 6:05-cv-06045-RTD Document 299 Filed 05/04/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>