Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00621/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00621-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

G:\PRO-SE\SJ.JW\HC.07\cramer00621_coa.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BILLY CRAMER,

Petitioner,

 vs.

WILLIAM DUNCAN, Warden

Respondent.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 07-00621 JW (PR)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE

OF APPEALABILITY

(Docket No. 38)

Petitioner, a California state prisoner currently incarcerated at Salinas Valley

State Prison, filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. On July 31, 2007, the petition was dismissed and judgment entered,

and on September 18, 2007, petitioner filed a petition for a certificate of

appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253© and Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 22(b). In addition to being untimely, the petition does not show “that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of

the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable

whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” See Slack v.

Case 5:07-cv-00621-JW Document 39 Filed 10/12/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

G:\PRO-SE\SJ.JW\HC.07\cramer00621_coa.wpd 2

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Accordingly, the request for a certificate of

appealability is DENIED. 

The Clerk shall forward this order, along with the case file, to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, from which petitioner also may seek a

certificate of appealability. See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th

Cir. 1997).

This order terminates Docket No. 38.

DATED: 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge 

October 12, 2007

Case 5:07-cv-00621-JW Document 39 Filed 10/12/07 Page 2 of 2