Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00543/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00543-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETE BAKKER, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v. 

WADE OSBORNE, an individual,

CAPAX MANAGEMENT & INSURANCE

SERVICES, a California Corporation,

OOI, INC., a California Corporation, and

DOES 1 TO 50,

Defendants.

 /

No. 1:07-CV-00543-AWI-SMS

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO

DEFENDANT CAPAX MANAGEMENT &

INSURANCE SERVICES

Plaintiff has filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant

CAPAX MANAGEMENT & INSURANCE SERVICES only. Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff

has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of

an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688,

692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995). The plaintiff

may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or all of his claims, through a Rule

41(a)(1) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Pedrina v.

Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609-10 (9th Cir. 1993). The filing of a notice of voluntary dismissal

with the court automatically terminates the action as to the defendants who are the

subjects of the notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997);

Concha, 62 F.2d at 1506. 

Case 1:07-cv-00543-AWI -SMS Document 10 Filed 06/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 2

No answers to Plaintiff’s complaint and no motions for summary judgment have

been filed in this case and it appears that no such answers or summary judgment motions

have been served. Because Plaintiff has exercised his right to voluntarily dismiss the

complaint under Rule 41(a)(1), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant CAPAX MANAGEMENT

& INSURANCE SERVICES is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 18, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00543-AWI -SMS Document 10 Filed 06/19/07 Page 2 of 2