Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_05-cv-04234/USCOURTS-azd-3_05-cv-04234-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

LAW OFFICES

RENAUD COOK

DRURY MESAROS

ONE NORTH CENTRAL

SUITE 900

PHOENIX, AZ 85004

TELEPHONE 602-307-9900

FACSIMILE 602-307-5853

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

No. 3:05-cv-4234-PGR 

(Page 1) S:\Tracy\Orders\05cv4234-OrderforDismissal.wpd

2402-0005

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

CARLISLE COATINGS AND

WATERPROOFING INCORPORATED., a

Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLEX-GUARD PRODUCTS, INC., an Arizona

corporation,

Defendant.

No. CV 05-4234-PCT- PGR 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

FLEX-GUARD PRODUCTS, INC., an Arizona

corporation,

Counterclaimant,

v.

CARLISLE COATINGS AND

WATERPROOFING INCORPORATED, a

Delaware corporation,

Counterdefendant.

Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal and good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED approving the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal entered in

furtherance of their written Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (“Settlement

Agreement”) under which plaintiff has released its claims arising in connection with this suit

Case 3:05-cv-04234-PGR Document 27 Filed 01/08/07 Page 1 of 2
LAW OFFICES

RENAUD COOK

DRURY MESAROS

ONE NORTH CENTRAL

SUITE 900

PHOENIX, AZ 85004

TELEPHONE 602-307-9900

FACSIMILE 602-307-5853

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

No. 3:05-cv-4234-PGR 

(Page 2) S:\Tracy\Orders\05cv4234-OrderforDismissal.wpd

2402-0005

in consideration of defendant’s agreement (1) to release its claims against plaintiff and make

a series of cash payments and (2) to enter into a Stipulation for Entry of Judgment, enforceable

only if defendant fails to make all scheduled payments under the Settlement Agreement.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this action, with prejudice, each party to bear

its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the

parties’ Settlement Agreement, including the entry of Judgment upon the parties’ Stipulation

for Entry of Judgment, if the payment conditions of the Settlement Agreement are not met. 

DATED this 8th day of January, 2007.

Case 3:05-cv-04234-PGR Document 27 Filed 01/08/07 Page 2 of 2