Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-19-07130/USCOURTS-caDC-19-07130-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 19-7130 September Term, 2019

1:19-cv-01274-UNA

Filed On: February 28, 2020

L. Ruther,

Appellant

v.

Kentucky, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Srinivasan, Chief Judge, Henderson, Circuit Judge, and 

 Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and the motion to

produce documents, it is

ORDERED that the motion to produce documents be denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s August 24, 2019

order be affirmed. Appellant has not shown that the district court abused its discretion

in denying leave to file his motion for stay in a closed case. See Berry v. District of

Columbia, 833 F.2d 1031, 1037 n.24 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

USCA Case #19-7130 Document #1830808 Filed: 02/28/2020 Page 1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 19-7130 September Term, 2019

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2

USCA Case #19-7130 Document #1830808 Filed: 02/28/2020 Page 2 of 2