Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-md-01486/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-md-01486-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Kevin P. Roddy (Cal. Bar No. 128283) 

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.Al. 

90 Woodbridge Center Drive, Suite 900 

Woodbridge, NJ 07095 

Telephone: (732) 636-8000 

Facsimile: (732) 726-6686 

kroddy@wilentz.com

Natalie Finkelman Bennett 

Admitted pro hac vice

SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, 

MILLER & SHAH, LLC 

35 E. State Street 

 Media, PA 19063 

Telephone: 610/891-9880 

Facsimile: 610/ 891-9883 

nfinkelman@classactioncounsel.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

[Other counsel appear on signature page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In Re DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS 

MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

CENTERPRISE INT’L, LTD. 

Docket No. 3:05cv3026 

Master File No. M-02-1486-PJH 

MDL No. 1486 

STIPULATION 

STIPULATION OF TIME TO ANSWER, PLEAD, MOVE 

OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 

Attorneys for the Plaintiff and the Defendants stipulate and agree that the Defendants shall 

have until October 3, 2005 to answer, plead, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this 

action. 

Defendants agree that they will not assert any defense that may be available to them on 

grounds of possible insufficiency of service of process. No Defendant waives, and each Defendant 

expressly preserves, all other rights and defenses that might be available to it, including without 

 

STIPULATION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE MOVE AS TO CENTERPRISE, INT’L COMPLAINT 

No. M-02-1486 PJH

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 528 Filed 08/19/05 Page 1 of 4
 2 

STIPULATION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE MOVE AS TO CENTERPRISE, INT’L COMPLAINT 

No. M-02-1486 PJH 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

limitation any defense that might be available on grounds of lack of jurisdiction. The effective date 

of service on all Defendants shall be deemed to be September 13, 2005 by virtue of the waiver of 

service by each Defendant, for purposes of this action only. 

In the event that any Defendant responds to the Complaint by filing a motion, Plaintiff may 

serve a response in opposition to any motions within 60 days after service. The moving Defendant 

shall have 30 days to file a reply brief in support of its motion. 

Dated: August 5, 2005 

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A. 

By: s/ Kevin P. Roddy 

 Kevin P. Roddy 

90 Woodbridge Center Drive, Suite 900 

Woodbridge, NJ 07095 

 SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, 

 MILLER & SHAH LLC 

By: s/Natalie Finkelman Bennett 

 Natalie Finkelman Bennett 

 

35 E. State Street 

Media, PA 19063 

Admitted pro hac vice

Plaintiff’s Counsel 

GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By: s/Joel Sanders 

 Joel S. Sanders 

One Montgomery Street 

Montgomery Tower, 31st Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 

Ronald C. Redcay 

777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90017-2513 

Attorneys for Defendants Micron 

Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor 

Products, Inc., and Crucial Technology, an 

unincorporated division of Micron 

Semiconductor Products, Inc. (which joins 

in this stipulation to the extent that it may 

deemed a proper party) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE 

LLP 

By: s/Robert Freitas 

 Robert E. Freitas 

Howard M. Ullman 

The Orrick Building

405 Howard Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

 

Attorneys for Defendants Nanya Technology 

Corporation and Nanya Technology 

Corporation USA 

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 528 Filed 08/19/05 Page 2 of 4
 3 

STIPULATION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE MOVE AS TO CENTERPRISE, INT’L COMPLAINT 

No. M-02-1486 PJH 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

KAYE SCHOLER LLP 

By: s/Julian Brew 

 Julian Brew 

Aton Arbisser 

Tanja Shipman 

1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS 

Saretta McDonough 

777 South Figueroa Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90017-2513 

Tefft W. Smith 

Karen N. Walker 

655 Fifteenth Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005-5793 

Attorneys for Defendants Infineon 

Technologies North America Corp. and 

Infineon Technologies AG 

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

By: s/Robert Pringle 

 Robert B. Pringle 

Paul R. Griffin 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3601 

Attorneys for Defendants Elpida Memory, 

Inc., Elpida Memory (USA) Inc., and NEC 

Electronics America, Inc. 

By: s/ Daniel L. Alexander 

 Daniel L. Alexander 

Kenneth R. O'Rourke 

400 South Hope Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899 

Ian Simmons

1625 Eye Street, Northwest 

Washington, DC 20006 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW 

 PITTMAN LLP 

Terrence A. Callan 

Albert J. Boro, Jr. 

50 Fremont Street 

P.O. Box 7880 

San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 

Attorneys for Defendants Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc. and Hynix 

Semiconductor America, Inc.

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER LLP 

By: s/Steven Morrissett 

 Steven H. Morrissett 

700 Hansen Way 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

COLLETTE, ERICKSON, FARMER & 

O'NEILL LLP 

William Farmer, Jr. 

235 Pine St, Suite 1300 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

 

Attorneys for Defendants Winbond 

Electronics Corporation and Winbond 

Electronics Corporation America 

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 528 Filed 08/19/05 Page 3 of 4
 4 

STIPULATION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE MOVE AS TO CENTERPRISE, INT’L COMPLAINT 

No. M-02-1486 PJH 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & 

HAMPTON LLP 

By: s/James McGinnis 

 James L. McGinnis 

Gary L. Halling 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4106 

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

Jonathan M. Jacobson 

Stephen A. Mansfield 

Robert B. Humphreys 

590 Madison Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Attorneys for Defendants Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung 

Semiconductor, Inc.

TOPEL & GOODMAN 

By: s/William Goodman 

 William M. Goodman 

832 Sansome Street, 4th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Attorneys for Defendants Mosel Vitelic 

Incorporated and Mosel Vitelic Corporation 

SO ORDERED: 

 Date: ______________________ , 2005 

Phyllis J. Hamilton, J. U.S.D.C. 

August 19

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 528 Filed 08/19/05 Page 4 of 4