Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO STIPULATION (F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(ii) 

CASE NO. C- 06-2454 MMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rubinstein Law Group 

A Professional Law Corporation 

Yano L. Rubinstein, Cal. Bar No. 214277 

Joseph J. Zynczak, Cal. Bar No. 209094 

116 New Montgomery Street, Suite 742 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 277-1900 

Facsimile: (415) 277-1919 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

STORUS CORPORATION 

Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP 

Eric P. Jacobs, Esq., State Bar No. 88413 

Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-3834 

Telephone: (415) 576-0200 

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 

Attorneys for Defendant

RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STORUS CORPORATION, a California 

corporation,

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation; SKYMALL, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation; AROA 

MARKETING, INC., a California 

Corporation, DBA GADGET UNIVERSE 

Defendants.

Case No. C 06-2454 MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION (F.R.C.P.

41(a)(1)(ii) 

Honorable MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 53 Filed 11/14/06 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO STIPULATION (F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(ii) 

CASE NO. C- 06-2454 MMC 

- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSELS OF RECORD: 

Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal executed by Storus Corporation and Restoration 

Hardware, Inc., and in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), all claims 

against Restoration Hardware are to be dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Storus Corporation’s First Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to 

Defendant Restoration Hardware, Inc. only;

2. Storus Corporation and Restoration Hardware, Inc. shall bear their own Attorney’s Fees 

and Costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: ____________ ___________________________________ 

 Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

 United States District Court Judge 

November 14, 2006

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 53 Filed 11/14/06 Page 2 of 2