Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00391/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00391-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Stipulation re Defendants’ Responsive Case No. 2:07-cv-00391-RRB-EFB 

Pleading to Second Amended Complaint 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KATHY E. MOUNT (SBN 104736) 

kmount@meyersnave.com

TERRY ROEMER (SBN 151894) 

troemer@meyersnave.com

JESSE J. LAD (SBN 229389) 

jlad@meyersnave.com

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 

555 12th Street, Suite 1500 

Oakland, California 94607 

Telephone: (510) 808-2000 

Facsimile: (510) 444-1108 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Benicia Housing Authority and 

Julie Peterson 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PHILIP D. EVANS, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

BENICIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, JULIE 

PETERSON, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:07-cv-00391-RRB-EFB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 

DEFENDANTS’ FILING OF RESPONSIVE 

PLEADING TO THE SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

) 

This Stipulation is made pursuant to Local Rules 83-143 and 6-144, with respect 

to the date of Defendants’ filing of the responsive pleading to the Second Amended 

Complaint. 

1. THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT the deadline 

for Defendants’ service of the responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint 

shall be extended to ten days after the date of entry and electronic service of the 

Court’s ruling on plaintiff’s pending motion to amend the Complaint; however, in the 

event that this Court grants plaintiff’s pending motion to amend the Complaint, plaintiff’s 

Third Amended Complaint shall supercede the Second Amended Complaint obviating 

the need for Defendants to respond to the Second Amended Complaint, and 

Defendants’ deadline for serving a responsive pleading to the Third Amended 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:07-cv-00391-JAM-EFB Document 44 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 2
____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Stipulation re Defendants’ Responsive Case No. 2:07-cv-00391-RRB-EFB 

Pleading to Second Amended Complaint 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Complaint shall be ten days after the date of service of the Third Amended Complaint, 

in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), unless a different date is 

specified by order of the Court. 

2. THE PARTIES FURTHER STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT the Exhibits 

to the Second Amended Complaint shall be deemed to have been filed and served on 

the same date that the Second Amended Complaint was filed and served. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: July 26, 2007 

 WARTELLE, WEAVER & SCHREIBER 

 

By:___/s/____________________________ 

 CHRISTINA A. SCHREIBER 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Philip Evans 

DATED: July 26, 2007 

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 

 By:_____/s/__________________________ 

TERRY ROEMER 

Attorneys for Defendants Benicia 

Housing Authority and Julie Peterson 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 7/31/07 

 By: /s/ Ralph R. Beistline______________

 HON. RALPH R. BEISTLINE 

CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

990733/1098.003 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:07-cv-00391-JAM-EFB Document 44 Filed 08/01/07 Page 2 of 2