Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01486/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01486-77/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re: JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION

 

This document relates to ALL ACTIONS

 /

No. C-02-1486 CW (EDL)

ORDER MODIFYING ORDER

GRANTING IN PART LEAD

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

LIMITED ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY

On April 17, 2007, Defendant Kalkhoven filed a letter seeking modification of the Court’s

April 10, 2007 Order Granting in Part Lead Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Limited Additional

Discovery. On April 19, 2007, Lead Plaintiff filed a response. The Court finds the matter suitable

for decision without a hearing and issues the following modification of the Court’s Order contained

on page 3, lines 1-6: 

Lead Plaintiff’s motion for limited additional discovery is granted as to documents (such as

investment portfolio statements, brokerage statements and trading records) sufficient to show the use

of proceeds from any sale of JDSU securities by Kalkhoven, and documents reflecting the total

values of Kalkhoven’s JDSU portfolio compared to his non-JDSU stock portfolio and other

investments during the relevant time period defined in Lead Plaintiff’s requests for production:

January 1, 1999 to the date of the Guay report. Kalkhoven shall produce such documents to Lead

Plaintiff by April 24, 2007. Kalkhoven need only produce documents that are already in existence,

and need not create responsive documents from receipts or other supporting documents. This Order

shall not be construed to require Kalkhoven to produce documents tracing his personal spending,

except for very large purchases such as real estate, if any. 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1079 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In all other respects, the April 10, 2007 Order remains in effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2007 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1079 Filed 04/20/07 Page 2 of 2