Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02275/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02275-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Petitioner was warned that he must file and serve a notice of change of address in

accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 4 at 2.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Alberto Gonzalez, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Katherine S. Kane, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-2275-PHX-ROS

ORDER

On June 25, 2008, Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco issued a Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus be dismissed as moot. (Doc. 20.) Petitioner failed to file timely objections. A review

of the docket indicates that the R&R was returned as undeliverable.1

 (Doc. 21.)

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is “clear that the

district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if

objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

Case 2:07-cv-02275-ROS Document 22 Filed 08/14/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

1126 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not otherwise.’”). District

courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject

of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). No objection having been

made, the Court will adopt the R&R in full.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is ADOPTED and the

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED AS MOOT. The Clerk of

Court shall close this case.

DATED this 14th day of August, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02275-ROS Document 22 Filed 08/14/08 Page 2 of 2