Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04099/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04099-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 A third defendant was dismissed pursuant to stipulation on January 8, 2007.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHLEEN MARTIN, 

Plaintiff, No. C 06-4099 PJH

v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

RULE 11 MOTION

FIRST RESOLUTION INVESTMENT 

CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

Plaintiff filed this action on June 30, 2006. The two defendants answered the

complaint on November 1, 2006, and November 7, 2006.1

 The case management

conference was held on November 30, 2006. On May 9, 2007, plaintiff filed a motion for

leave to amend the complaint, which was noticed for hearing on June 27, 2007. 

On May 18, 2007, defendants, who have filed no motions under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12, filed a motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11,

asserting that the allegations in the complaint are without merit. The court finds that

defendants’ motion must be DENIED as premature, given plaintiff’s pending motion to

amend the complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2007 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-04099-PJH Document 24 Filed 05/18/07 Page 1 of 1