Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-03888/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-03888-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

L AFAYE TTE & 

K

U

M AGAI LLP A TTO R N EYS A T L A

W

100 S P E A R S T R EET , SUITE 6 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94105 

(415) 3 5 7-460 0 

F A X ( 415) 3 5 7-4 605

 

LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP

GARY T. LAFAYETTE (State Bar No. 088666) 

SUSAN T. KUMAGAI (State Bar No. 127667) 

TATIANA SMALL (State Bar No. 259697) 

100 Spear Street, Suite 600 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 357-4600 

Facsimile: (415) 357-4605 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

JOYCE JONES, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AT&T, a corporation doing business in 

California; PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 

COMPANY; STEPHANIE CHANDLER, an 

individual; CINDY TSUE, an individual; 

GABRIEL REYES, an individual, 

Defendants.

Case No. C07-3888 JF 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT PACIFIC BELL 

TELEPHONE COMPANY’S MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Date: March 12, 2010 

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Courtroom: 3, 5th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

 

Complaint Filed: July 31, 2007 

Trial Date: July 16, 2010

Defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company’s (“Pacific Bell”) Motion for Summary 

Judgment came on regularly for hearing before the Court on March 12, 2010, the Honorable 

Jeremy Fogel presiding. Susan T. Kumagai appeared on behalf of defendant Pacific Bell 

Telephone Company. Plaintiff Joyce Jones (“Plaintiff”) appeared at the hearing pro se but did not

file opposition papers. The Court gave Jones three additional weeks within which to file written

opposition to the motion, but Jones failed to do so. Having carefully considered the arguments, 

relevant legal authority and evidence presented, the Court hereby grants Pacific Bell’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Case No. C07-3888 JF)

**E-Filed 6/9/2010**

------------------

Case 5:07-cv-03888-JF Document 105 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 2
2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

L AFAYE TTE & 

K

U

M AGAI LLP A TTO R N EYS A T L A

W

100 S P E A R S T R EET , SUITE 6 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94105 

(415) 3 5 7-460 0 

F A X ( 415) 3 5 7-4 605

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________, 2010

 

 JEREMY FOGEL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Proposed Order-MSJ.doc 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Case No. C07-3888 JF)

6/9/2010

Case 5:07-cv-03888-JF Document 105 Filed 06/09/10 Page 2 of 2