Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_05-cv-00190/USCOURTS-almd-2_05-cv-00190-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

MARSHALL WAYNE HALL, #161 841 *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:05-CV-190-T

WO

BRIAN WHITE, M.D., et al., *

Defendants. *

 _______________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On April 29, 2005 Plaintiff filed a Motion to Dismiss. Upon consideration of the

motion, the court concludes that the motion is due to be granted. Furthermore, since the

complaint has not been served, the court finds that this case is due to be dismissed without

prejudice. See Rule 41(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7) be GRANTED;

2. This case be DISMISSED without prejudice; and

3. No costs or fees be taxed in this case.

 It is further

ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the said

Recommendation on or before May 16, 2005. Any objections filed must specifically identify

the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation objected to. Frivolous, conclusive

Case 2:05-cv-00190-MHT-SRW Document 8 Filed 05/02/05 Page 1 of 2
or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The parties are advised

that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore, it is not appealable.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the

Magistrate Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District

Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual

findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain

error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982). See Stein

v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of

Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981, en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the

decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on

September 30, 1981. 

DONE, this 2nd day of May, 2005.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00190-MHT-SRW Document 8 Filed 05/02/05 Page 2 of 2