Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-06-02968/USCOURTS-ca8-06-02968-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2968

___________

Vincent Hussey, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Marvin Evans, Warden, Maximum *

Security Unit, ADC; Max Mobley, *

Deputy/Assistant Director, Arkansas * [UNPUBLISHED]

Department of Correction; Sangoseni, *

Dr., Arkansas Department of *

Correction; Charlotte Green, *

Infirmary Administrator, Maximum *

Security Unit, ADC, originally *

Sued as “C. Green”; Jonathan E. *

Simmons, Dr., Arkansas Department *

of Correction, originally sued as *

“Simmons”; Tommy James, Asst. *

Warden, Maximum Security Unit, *

ADC (originally sued as James); *

Ophelia Grandy, Infirmary Manager, *

Maximum Security Unit, ADC, *

originally sued as “O. Grandy”; *

John Byus, Director of Medical Care, *

Arkansas Department of Correction, *

*

Appellees. *

Appellate Case: 06-2968 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/19/2007 Entry ID: 3331252
1

The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District

of Arkansas. 

2

The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

3

We decline to address the allegations Hussey raises for the first time on appeal.

See Naucke v. City of Park Hills, 284 F.3d 923, 927 n.2 (8th Cir. 2002).

-2-

___________

Submitted: July 13, 2007

Filed: July 19, 2007

___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Vincent Hussey appeals the district court’s1

 orders granting

summary judgment to one defendant, and dismissing without prejudice another

defendant for failure to serve process; and the district court’s2

 subsequent adverse

grant of summary judgment to the remaining defendants. Having carefully reviewed

the record, we affirm. See Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006)

(summary judgment standard of review); Lee v. Armontrout, 991 F.2d 487, 489 (8th

Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (it is in forma pauperis plaintiff’s responsibility to provide

proper address for service).3

 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

Appellate Case: 06-2968 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/19/2007 Entry ID: 3331252