Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-05857/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-05857-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

E&B NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 

CORPORATION, ET AL., 

Plaintiffs,

vs. 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ET AL., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 18-cv-05857-YGR 

ORDER RELIEVING PARTIES FROM 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRE-FILING 

CONFERENCE REQUIREMENT

Based upon the Court’s review of the pre-filing letters submitted by the parties, no prefiling conference is required. 

The parties are reminded of the requirement to file separate statements of fact in the format 

set forth in paragraph 9(c) of this Court’s Standing Order, including the requirement that counsel 

attest that the evidence cited for each fact or dispute fairly and accurately supports the fact or 

dispute. 

As previewed for the parties at the case management conference, the Court considers 

summary judgment a tool to be used prudently, when there are no disputed issues of material fact. 

To the extent there are triable issues of material fact, summary judgment will be denied with a 

succinct denial order, without extensive commentary, so that the determination is left wholly for 

the trier of fact. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 21, 2019 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:18-cv-05857-YGR Document 55 Filed 10/21/19 Page 1 of 1