Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00400/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00400-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MONTEREY MUSHROOMS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant.. /

No. C06-00400 HRL

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ THIRD

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND

DISCOVERY DEADLINES

On April 9, 2007, the parties submitted their third stipulated request to extend discovery

deadlines, some of which had already expired at the time the request was filed. This court

nonetheless has the power to relieve a party of an expired time limit for performing an act upon

a showing of excusable neglect. FED.R.CIV.P. 6(b). Here, it appears that the parties are moving

forward with their efforts to resolve this matter informally; and, their requested extension will

be granted. However, the parties are advised that the court is not inclined to continue this

matter indefinitely. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The discovery deadlines are extended as follows:

Fact Discovery Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 8, 2007

Designation of Experts with Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 8, 2007

Designation of Rebuttal Experts with Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 18, 2007

Expert Discovery Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . July 18, 2007

*E-FILED: 4/11/2007*

Case 5:06-cv-00400-HRL Document 25 Filed 04/11/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. The court will discuss this matter further at the May 29, 2007 case management

conference, which remains on calendar at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2. At that time, the court will

consider whether other deadlines and trial (all of which were vacated in a previous order)

should be re-set. The parties shall be prepared to discuss whether or not they believe further

mediation efforts will be productive. The parties are reminded that their joint status report shall

be filed no later than May 22, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

April 11, 2007

Case 5:06-cv-00400-HRL Document 25 Filed 04/11/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:06-cv-400 Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

Bradley A. Bening bab@wsblaw.net, kas@wsblaw.net 

Bruce D. MacLeod bdm@wsblaw.net, lnm@wsblaw.net 

Julian J. Pardini pardini@lbbslaw.com, koch@lbbslaw.com 

Sara J. Savage sara.savage@wilsonelser.com, marylisette.meyer@wilsonelser.com 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who

have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Case 5:06-cv-00400-HRL Document 25 Filed 04/11/07 Page 3 of 3