Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00158/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00158-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MEBRHATO TSEHAI,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DERRAL G. ADAMS, WARDEN,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00158-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 17)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH

RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED (Doc.

10) 

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL COUNTS AS

A STRIKE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

§1915(g)

Plaintiff Mebrhato Tsehai (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 15, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

Case 1:05-cv-00158-OWW -LJO Document 19 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

contained notice to plaintiff that an objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. To date,

plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 15, 2006,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for

plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted under section 1983; and

3. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§1915(g). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 29, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00158-OWW -LJO Document 19 Filed 07/31/06 Page 2 of 2