Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02387/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02387-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT FJLED 

HOME SAVINGS BANK, F.A., 

Plaintiff-Appellant and 

Cross-Appellee, 

PHOENIX FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN 

ASSOCIATION, 

Plaintiff, 

ASSOCIATED FINANCIAL CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff and Third-Party 

Intervenor, 

v. 

COOPERS & LYBRAND, 

Defendant-Appellee and 

Cross-Appellant, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

UNITED SAVINGS; CB FINANCIAL ) 

CORPORATION; CHARLES J. BAZARIAN; ) 

JANICE L. BAZARIAN; ED MITTELSTET; ) 

KEN MCCLANAHAN; LARRY CONDITT; ROBERT ) 

ENGLES; WILLIAM D. MANAHAN; KENNY ) 

SIMPSON; W.O. YOUNG; FRANCES MITTELSTET;) 

BLOOMFIELD SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, ) 

F.A.; FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN; ) 

HOMESTEAD FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ) 

ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS & ) 

LOAN ASSOCIATION; INVESTORS SAVINGS & ) 

LOAN ASSOCIATION; UNIVERSAL SAVINGS & ) 

LOAN ASSOCIATION, ) 

Defendants, 

WOODVILLE LTD. PART.; CREST HOUSING 

FUND, LTD.; VERNON MANOR HOUSING FUND, 

LTD.; CAROLINA HOUSING FUND, LTD.; 

DALLAS HOUSING FUND, LTD.; EAST HILLS 

HOUSING FUND, LTD.; GLEN HOUSING FUND, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

United Statn Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

JAN 2 - 1990 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

Nos. 88-2387 

& 

88-2399 

(D.C. No. 86-2422-P) 

(W.D. Okla.) 

Appellate Case: 88-2387 Document: 01019957838 Date Filed: 01/02/1990 Page: 1 
LTD.: NOB HOUSING FUND, LTD.: SAN ) 

FRANCISCO HOUSING FUND, LTD.: KING ) 

HOUSING FUND, LTD.: and NEVADA HOUSING ) 

FUND, LTD., ) 

) 

Third-Party Intervenors. ) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before MOORE, BARRETT, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of these appeals. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a): 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The cases are therefore ordered 

The plaintiff, Home Savings Bank, F.A., appeals from both the 

assertedly inadequate judgment entered in its favor by the 

district court in accordance with the verdict of the jury and the 

court's order denying its motion for partial new trial. The 

defendant, Coopers & Lybrand, cross-appeals from the judgment 

entered on the jury verdict. 

We have considered the parties' assignments of error and 

conclude that they are without merit. The judgment and order of 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

2 

Appellate Case: 88-2387 Document: 01019957838 Date Filed: 01/02/1990 Page: 2 
the district court entered on June 30, 1988, and August 10, 1988, 

respectively, are AFFIRMED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

.I,,,, 

3 

Appellate Case: 88-2387 Document: 01019957838 Date Filed: 01/02/1990 Page: 3