Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06018/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06018-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

ALFRED BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

EDGAR CASTILLO, et al., )

) 

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 02-6018 AWI DLB P 

ORDER CLARIFYING ORDER

DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

RESPOND TO AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. On July 29, 2005, the Court, after screening plaintiff’s

amended complaint, entered an order requiring defendants CASTILLO, CURTIS, J.J KING, T.

BARBEIRO, D. WALKER, J. BUNKER, I. MATHOS, D. DUVALL, and T. DULAY to respond

to the amended complaint. The Court inadvertently included defendant BUNKER in this order. 

///

///

///

///

///

Case 1:02-cv-06018-LJO-DLB Document 101 Filed 09/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

Defendant BUNKER has filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint which is still pending

before the Court and therefore defendant BUNKER is under no obligation to further respond to the

amended complaint at this time.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 15, 2005 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06018-LJO-DLB Document 101 Filed 09/16/05 Page 2 of 2