Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00119/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00119-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES FIELDS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0119 LKK KJM P

vs.

D.K. SISTO, Warden, et al., 

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed January 31, 2007, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma

pauperis affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within twenty days, or his application

would be dismissed. The twenty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded

to the court's order, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate

filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:07-cv-00119-LKK -KJM Document 5 Filed 03/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 15, 2007. 

/bb

fiel0119.fphc

Case 2:07-cv-00119-LKK -KJM Document 5 Filed 03/16/07 Page 2 of 2