Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03015/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03015-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Antonneo R. Boyce, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora Schriro, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-3015-PHX-ROS (ECV)

ORDER

Petitioner has filed a Motion to Stay (Doc. #35) in which he requests a stay of the case

pending the resolution of a writ of mandamus that he filed in the Ninth Circuit Court of

Appeals involving a discovery issue. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that his writ of

mandamus has a strong likelihood of success. Accordingly, a stay is not warranted. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That Petitioner's Motion to Stay (Doc. #35) is denied.

DATED this 10th day of July, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03015-ROS Document 36 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 1