Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03054/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03054-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1 CASE NO. CV 06-03054 VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY 

& BASS 

LLP 

One Ferry Building, Suite 200, San Francisco, CA 94111-4213

(415) 391-4800 • fax (415) 989-1663

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

08705.012.464090v2 

NAOMI RUSTOMJEE (State Bar # 142088) 

JULIA D. GREER (State Bar # 200479) 

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP 

One Ferry Building, Suite 200 

San Francisco, California 94111-4213 

Telephone: (415) 391-4800 

Facsimile: (415) 989-1663 

Email: ef-nxr@cpdb.com, ef-jdg@cpdb.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

GLOBAL SOFTWARE RESOURCES, INC., 

a California corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GLOBAL SOFTWARE RESOURCES, 

INC., a California corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

AKHIL JHAVERI, an individual, 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. CV 06-03054 VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Scheduled Hearing Date/Time: 10/5/06; 2 p.m. 

Requested Continuance of Hearing 

 Date/Time: 11/2/06; 2 p.m.

Judge: Hon. Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker 

Dept.: Courtroom 6, 17th Floor 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Global Software Resources, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) 

and Defendant Akhil Jhaveri (“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned counsel, submit 

this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Continue Hearing on Motion to Dismiss First Amended 

Complaint: 

WHEREAS, on or about May 26, 2006, Defendant filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to 

Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be 

Granted Under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) (“Motion to Dismiss”). To date, the originally scheduled 

hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss has been twice continued, as follows: to August 24, 2006, 

by agreement of the parties, pursuant to applicable rules; and to the current date of October 5, 

Case 3:06-cv-03054-VRW Document 19 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-03054-VRW Document 20 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 4
2 CV 06-03054 VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY 

& BASS 

LLP 

One Ferry Building, Suite 200, San Francisco, CA 94111-4213

(415) 391-4800 • fax (415) 989-1663

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

08705.012.464090v2 

2006, by Order of this Court, entered on July 21, 2006, on the parties’ stipulation, inter alia, that 

they required additional time to remain engaged in then on-going settlement negotiations. 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have now reached an agreement-in-principle on a 

settlement that includes, without limitation, the ultimate dismissal of this action, and have begun 

the process of negotiating and preparing the necessary settlement documentation. 

WHEREAS, the parties require a reasonable continuance of the hearing on the Motion to 

Dismiss -- and a corresponding extension of time for the preparation/filing of their respective 

briefing papers -- to enable them to conclude their negotiation and preparation of the settlement 

documentation and to take other settlement closing related actions. 

WHEREAS, the parties reasonably and in good faith believe that the stipulated-to 

continuance will facilitate the finalization and conclusion of a settlement, and thereby avoid any 

needless expenditure of time and other resources by the parties and the Court, and do not seek a 

continuance order for delay or any other improper purpose. 

THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: 

1. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss should be continued from 2:00 p.m. on 

October 5, 2006 to 2:00 p.m. on November 2, 2006 (or on the first available date 

thereafter on the Court’s calendar); 

2. Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss should be filed and served on or 

before October 12, 2006; and 

3. Defendant’s Reply to the Motion to Dismiss should be filed and served on or 

before October 26, 2006. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:06-cv-03054-VRW Document 19 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-03054-VRW Document 20 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 4
3 CV 06-03054 VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY 

& BASS 

LLP 

One Ferry Building, Suite 200, San Francisco, CA 94111-4213

(415) 391-4800 • fax (415) 989-1663

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

08705.012.464090v2 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: September 8, 2006 COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP 

By: /s/ Naomi Rustomjee 

NAOMI RUSTOMJEE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

GLOBAL SOFTWARE RESOURCES, INC. 

Dated: September 8, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN P. LEWIS, JR. 

By: 

JOHN P. LEWIS, JR. 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AKHIL JHAVERI 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________, 2006 

 THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUDGE 

 VAUGHN R. WALKER 

 United States District Court 

Case 3:06-cv-03054-VRW Document 19 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 3 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-03054-VRW Document 20 Filed 09/11/06 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06

cv03054VRW Document 19 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 4 of 4

9/11

Case 3:06-cv-03054-VRW Document 20 Filed 09/11/06 Page 4 of 4