Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01486/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01486-109/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION

 /

No. C 02-1486 CW

ORDER RE:

SEQUENCING OF

WITNESSES AT

TRIAL

Pursuant to the Court's instruction at the pre-trial

conference, the parties have met and conferred regarding the

sequencing of witnesses at trial and submitted a joint statement

outlining their points of agreement and their respective positions

on the remaining disputes. 

Having considered the parties' positions and good causing

appearing therefor, the Court hereby orders:

1. As stated at the pre-trial conference, the Individual

Defendants shall be called in the Defendants' case-in-chief.

2. Plaintiffs may call Brian Cover, Ken Crawford, Kerry

DeHority, Ed Grabowy, Russ Johnson, Glen Kernick, and Steve Moore

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1645 Filed 10/16/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

during their case-in-chief, but may not do so until after their

expert, Steven Henning has testified. In the alternative, the

parties may agree that these witnesses will be called in the

Defendants' case-in-chief and Plaintiffs will be permitted to

cross-examine them without limitation to the scope of Defendants'

direct examination. 

3. If Defendants cannot assure that David Lightfoot and Rick

MacMillan will appear to testify during their case-in-chief,

Plaintiffs may introduce the witnesses' deposition testimony during

their case-in-chief and Defendants will not be permitted to present

live testimony from either. If Defendants can assure that

Lightfoot and MacMillan will appear during their case-in-chief,

Plaintiffs will have an opportunity to cross-examine them without

limitation to the scope of Defendants' direct examination.

4. To the extent possible, the parties should stipulate to

the authenticity of documents. The Court notes that the parties'

joint pre-trial conference statement included the following

stipulations:

A. The parties stipulate that all documents produced

by JDSU to [Plaintiffs] for purposes of this

litigation are authentic.

B. The parties stipulate to the authenticity of all

published print news articles and

publicly-available press releases and analyst

reports, but preserve all hearsay objections.

Joint Pre-Trial Conference Statement at 31. If any party intends

to dispute the authenticity of a document not included in these

stipulations, it must first make a written offer of proof regarding

the factual basis for its challenge.

5. The parties shall splice any video testimony to be used at

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1645 Filed 10/16/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

trial into a single presentation which includes all parties'

designations in the sequence that the testimony was given. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 10/16/07 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1645 Filed 10/16/07 Page 3 of 3