Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-04263/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-04263-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

Case No.: 5:15-cv-04263-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MEDELYN BUENO,

Plaintiff,

v.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL 

CREDIT UNION,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:15-cv-04263-EJD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On May 12, 2016, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff and Defendant Santa Clara 

County Federal Credit Union to meet and confer in order to reach an agreement on an ADR 

process and file, within 10 days, either (1) the form entitled “Stipulation and (Proposed) Order 

Selecting ADR Process” if an agreement is reached on one form of ADR, or (2) the form entitled 

“Notice of Need of ADR Phone Conference.” Dkt. No. 52. As of the date and time this was order 

was filed, the parties have not complied and the time for compliance has expired.

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to appear before the Honorable Edward J. Davila on 

June 2, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 1, 5th Floor, United States District Court, 280 S. 

First Street, San Jose, California, 95113, to show cause why the court should not impose any and 

all appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal of this action, on the parties, 

or any of them, for willful disobedience of a court order.

The parties may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions

Case 5:15-cv-04263-EJD Document 53 Filed 05/24/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:15-cv-04263-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

should not be imposed on or before May 27, 2016. In doing so, however, they must (1) explain 

their failure to comply with the original deadline to file one of the ADR forms, and (2) must also 

file one of the forms contemplated by the May 12th Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-04263-EJD Document 53 Filed 05/24/16 Page 2 of 2