Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00286/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00286-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

The plaintiffs are directed to Local Rule 78-230(b) for the

process of properly noticing a motion before the court.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANNE HARRIS and JESS HARRIS,

NO. CIV. S-08-286 LKK/KJM 

Plaintiffs,

v.

O R D E R

AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY,

ALLIED PROPERTY & CASUALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY, and 

NATIONWIDE INSURANCE; and 

DOES 1-25, inclusive,

Defendants.

 /

The court is in receipt of the defendants’ notice of removal

and a document filed by the plaintiffs titled “Opposition to

Petition for Removal of Action.” This filing is improper; if the

plaintiffs seek to have the action remanded to state court, they

must file a noticed Motion for Remand.1 See 28 U.S.C. 1447(c).

Because the plaintiffs' document is not a noticed motion that would

provide the defendants an opportunity to respond on the merits, the

Case 2:08-cv-00286-LKK -KJM Document 7 Filed 02/28/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

court will disregard it.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 28, 2008.

Case 2:08-cv-00286-LKK -KJM Document 7 Filed 02/28/08 Page 2 of 2