Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-01301/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-01301-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COREY ANTHONY COLLINS,

Petitioner,

Case No. 12cv1301 DMS (WMc)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION,

DISMISSING PETITION, AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

vs.

DOMINGO URIBE, JR., Warden,

Respondent.

Petitioner Corey Anthony Collins, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ

of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 challenging his conviction and sentence for second

degree robbery and participation in a street gang. The petition was referred to United States

Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr. for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

Section 636(b)(1)(B) and Civil Local Rule 72.1(d). Respondent filed an answer. Petitioner did not

file a traverse, which was due no later than July 26, 2013. (See Order (1) Lifting Stay and Abeyance

of Federal Proceedings, and (2) Requiring Response to Petition, filed May 21, 2013.) On September

12, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending to deny the

petition.

Petitioner timely objected to the Report and Recommendation after his request for extension

of time was granted. (See Order Granting Petitioner’s Request for Extension of Time, filed Oct. 21,

2013.) Respondent did not file a response. In reviewing a magistrate judge's report and

recommendation, the district court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report

- 1 -

Case 3:12-cv-01301-DMS-WMC Document 28 Filed 12/05/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

... to which objection is made," and "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings

or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review

of the Report and Recommendation and Petitioner’s objections, the objections are overruled. The

Report and Recommendation is adopted. The petition is denied. Certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 4, 2013

HON. DANA M. SABRAW

United States District Judge

- 2 -

Case 3:12-cv-01301-DMS-WMC Document 28 Filed 12/05/13 Page 2 of 2