Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06149/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06149-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS McCORNELL,

Plaintiff, CV F 02 6149 AWI WMW P

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

JAMES GOMEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

On February 8, 2006, an order was entered, dismissing the operative pleading in this

action and granting Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff failed to do so, and the

court recommended dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim. On April 11, 2006,

Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. On May 25, 2006, an order was

entered, vacating the recommendation of dismissal and granting Plaintiff an extension of time in

which to file an amended complaint. The thirty day period has expired, and Plaintiff has failed

to file an amended complaint. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure

to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

Case 1:02-cv-06149-AWI-WMW Document 52 Filed 06/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 30, 2006 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06149-AWI-WMW Document 52 Filed 06/30/06 Page 2 of 2