Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01356/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01356-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT AMATRONE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RANDY CHAMPION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-01356-JST 

ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO ORDER 

GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Re: ECF No. 128

Plaintiffs have filed a document entitled “Objections to Order Granting Motions to 

Dismiss,” ECF No. 128, that references the Court’s February 18, 2016 order granting two motions 

to dismiss, ECF No. 122, as well as the Court’s February 26, 2016 order dismissing several 

defendants for failure to effect service, ECF No. 126. Plaintiffs’ “Objections” offer several 

disagreements with the Court’s conclusions in both orders.

Although Plaintiffs have not sought leave under Civil L.R. 7-9(a), the Court construes this 

document as a Motion for Reconsideration of both the Court’s February 18 and February 26 

orders. So construed, the motion is denied. Plaintiffs have not demonstrated, under Civil L.R. 7-

9(b), that (1) “a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the 

Court before entry” of the orders; (2) “emergence of new material facts or a change of law 

occurring after the time” of the orders; or (3) a “manifest failure by the Court to consider material 

facts or dispositive legal arguments which were presented to the Court” before the orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 18, 2016

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01356-JST Document 130 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 1