Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05264/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05264-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

Page 1 – Case No. 14-cv-05264-JST STIP/ORDER RE: MEDIATION (ADR LR 6-5) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER BOYD, P.A. 

CHRISTOPHER B. MAJOR, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) 

BONNIE A. LYNCH, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) 

One North Main, 2nd Floor 

Greenville, SC 29601-2119 

Telephone: 864-240-3200 

Facsimile: 864-240-3300 

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP 

WILLIAM F. MURPHY, ESQ. (SBN 82482) 

TAYLOR F. FORD, ESQ. (SBN 297014) 

601 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, California 94108 

Telephone: (415) 397-2700 

Facsimile: (415) 397-3300 

Attorneys for Plaintiff KENTWOOL COMPANY 

GATTEY LAW OFFICE 

SCOTT GATTEY, Esq. (SBN 180875) 

1001 Laurel Street, Suite C 

San Carlos, CA 94070 

Telephone: 650-596-7123 

Facsimile: 877-269-4437 

Attorneys for Defendant NETSUITE INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NOTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KENTWOOL COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

NETSUITE INC., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 14-cv-05264-JST 

STIPULATION FOR AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME TO COMPLETE MEDIATION 

ADR Local Rule 6-5 

Pursuant to Rule 6-5 of the ADR Local Rule for the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California, Plaintiff KENTWOOL COMPANY (“Kentwool”) and 

defendant NETSUITE INC. (“NetSuite”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby 

Case 3:14-cv-05264-JST Document 72 Filed 06/02/15 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 – Case No. 14-cv-05264-JST STIP/ORDER RE: MEDIATION (ADR LR 6-5) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

stipulate that the Court may enter an order extending the parties’ time to complete mediation 

with the Court’s ADR Unit from July 27, 2015 to August 20, 2015. Entering the requested 

order will not change or affect any other dates set by the Court in this action. 

Pursuant to ADL Local Rule 6-5(b)(1), there is good cause for the entry of the requested 

order, for the following reasons. The appointed mediator, Daniel Bowling, Esq., and the parties 

conducted a pre-mediation telephone conference pursuant to ADR Local Rule 6-6 on May 26, 

2015. The parties and the mediator selected several alternative dates for the upcoming 

mediation, consistent with the dates available for counsel and the representative of defendant 

NetSuite, subject to Plaintiff Kentwool determining the availability of its representative, the 

Company’s Chief Executive Officer, at the mediation. The tentative dates selected were also 

impacted by the necessity of completing certain limited discovery prior to the mediation, and 

by the mediator’s scheduled travel plans. After all these matters were taken into account, the 

only date available for all counsel, the mediator, and the clients among the several tentative 

dates turned out to be August 19, 2015. 

All parties concur in this request to extend the mediation deadline to August 20, 2015. 

The parties accordingly are proceeding via a stipulation as opposed to a noticed motion. ADR 

Local Rule 6-5(b)(2). A proposed Order accompanies this stipulation. ADR Local Rule 6-

5(b)(3). 

For the foregoing reasons, Counsel for Kentwool and counsel for NetSuite jointly ask 

the Court to extend the deadline for completing mediation in this action to and including 

August 20, 2015, by entering the requested order, submitted herewith. 

Dated: May 29, 2015 DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP 

 WILLIAM M. MURPHY, ESQ. 

 TAYLOR F. FORD, ESQ. 

 By: ____/s/ William F. Murphy_____________ 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff Kentwool Company 

Dated: May 29, 2015 GATTEY LAW OFFICE 

 SCOTT GATTEY, ESQ. 

 By: _____/s/ Scott Gattey___________________ 

 Attorneys for Defendant NetSuite Inc. 

Case 3:14-cv-05264-JST Document 72 Filed 06/02/15 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 – Case No. 14-cv-05264-JST STIP/ORDER RE: MEDIATION (ADR LR 6-5) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

 The Court, having reviewed for preceding Stipulation, and good cause appearing, 

hereby ORDERS that pursuant to Rule 6-5 of the ADR Rules for the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of California, the deadline for the parties to complete 

mediation is extended to and including August 20, 2015 

 Dated: ___________________, 2015. 

 __________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

June 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-05264-JST Document 72 Filed 06/02/15 Page 3 of 3