Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02006/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02006-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMJAD ALI ALABED and SAMAH 

HUSSEIN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JONATHAN CRAWFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-2006 SKO

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION 

FOR FURTHER DISCOVERY

)

On August 13, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a "brief in support of additional discovery" pursuant 

to discussion at the scheduling conference regarding the scope of the record and the standard of 

judicial review. Plaintiffs sought to supplement the record with additional discovery.

On August 25, 2014, the government filed a brief in opposition to Plaintiffs' request for 

additional discovery. (Doc. 21.) Plaintiffs filed a brief in reply to the government's opposition 

on September 23, 2014, which stated that having reviewed a recent order in Galos v. Beers, 

2014 WL 954851, No. 4:12-cv-2902 DMR (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2014), they agreed that no further 

discovery was needed, and the issue of a lack of sufficient evidence could be expounded 

through summary judgment.

Case 1:13-cv-02006-SKO Document 28 Filed 09/30/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

As Plaintiffs have withdrawn their motion for additional discovery, the motion is moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 29, 2014 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-02006-SKO Document 28 Filed 09/30/14 Page 2 of 2