Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01107/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01107-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM ROUSER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1107 JAM GGH P

vs.

K. RUTHERFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On December 2, 2009, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order filed November 17, 2009, denying plaintiff’s motion for law library

access. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does

not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed November 17, 2009, is affirmed. 

DATED: January 22, 2010

/s/ John A. Mendez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-01107-JAM-GGH Document 69 Filed 01/25/10 Page 1 of 1