Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01279/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01279-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant. /

No. C 14-01279 WHA

ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiff Michael A. Bruzzone has filed a motion for reconsideration. Attached to that

motion was 36-page declaration that was simply further legal argument. A penny was also

attached to that motion. Plaintiff’s declaration is a thinly-veiled attempt to circumvent the

requirements of Civil Local Rule 7-2. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. The hearing

set for OCTOBER 15 is hereby VACATED. The Clerk shall return plaintiff’s papers and the penny

to him.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 1, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-01279-WHA Document 104 Filed 09/01/15 Page 1 of 1