Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02641/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02641-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 7:6(b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING AND SERVICE OF OPPOSITION TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DIVISION OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION and THE COMMISSIONER 

OF CORPORATIONS OF THE STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA,

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

NATIONAL INVESTMENT 

CONSULTANTS, INC, a California 

corporation,

PACIFIC BEST GROUP LTD, a.k.a. 

PACIFIC BEST COMPANY LTD, a British 

Virgin Islands Corporation, YI KERRY XU, 

an individual, RUN PING ZHOU a.k.a. 

FLORA ZHOU, an individual, and WEI M. 

TSE a.k.a. RAYMOND TSE, an individual, 

 Defendants, 

CASE NO.: 052641 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING 

AND SERVICE OF OPPOSITION TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

(USDC Civil L.R. 6-3) 

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White 

 and 

THERESA C. WONG, an individual, 

 Relief Defendant. 

Case 3:05-cv-02641-JSW Document 27 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:05-cv-02641-JSW Document 30 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING AND SERVICE OF OPPOSITION TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Defendants National Investment Consultants, Inc., Wei M. Tse a.k.a. Raymond Tse and 

Relief Defendant Theresa Wong (collectively “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Local Rule 

6-3 of the United States District Court, Northern District of California for an Order Extending 

Time for Filing and Service of Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion For Preliminary 

Injunction (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”) in the above-captioned matter. 

Defendants attempted to meet and confer with plaintiffs’ counsel prior to filing this Motion 

for Extended Time but were unsuccessful in obtaining plaintiffs’ agreement on an extended 

hearing date and briefing schedule for Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion. However, 

plaintiffs do not oppose Defendants’ Motion. 

This Court, having considered Defendants’ Motion and all the other pleadings filed in 

connection with this matter, and good cause appearing therefore, GRANTS Defendants’ motion, 

and, THEREFORE: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Preliminary injunction shall be filed and served no later than August 11, 2005. 

Plaintiffs’ Reply, if any, shall be filed and served by August 19, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ______________ 

____________________________________

HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:05-cv-02641-JSW Document 27 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 2 of 2

July 29, 2005

Case 3:05-cv-02641-JSW Document 30 Filed 07/29/05 Page 2 of 2