Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05001/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05001-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID SLACK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RUSSELL E. BURNS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-05001-EMC 

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS 

TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Docket Nos. 292, 303

Previously, the Court deferred ruling in part on Plaintiffs’ motions to file under seal, see 

Docket Nos. 292, 303 (motions), so that third parties could provide a declaration, either justifying 

the confidentiality designation or waiving such designation. See Docket no. 314, 315 (orders).

The Court has now received a declaration from Amalgamated Bank (“AB”). See Docket 

No. 319 (Freel declaration). The declaration provides a basis for sealing Exhibits XXX and YYY 

to the Leviant reply declaration, see Docket No. 303-4 (Leviant reply declaration), and Exhibits 7 

and 9-11 to the McKenzie declaration. See Docket No. 292-4 (McKenzie declaration). 

Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion to seal those exhibits.

The Court did not receive a declaration from IPS. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES

the motion to seal Exhibit VVV to the Leviant reply declaration. 

This order along with the orders at Docket Nos. 314 and 315 dispose of Docket Nos. 292 

and 303.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 5, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-05001-EMC Document 322 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 1