Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03465/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03465-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRI NGUYEN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-3465 FCD GGH P

vs.

J. PAULSEN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER &

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On March

18, 2010, the court found plaintiff’s complaint stated a colorable claim for money damages

against defendants Paulsen, Nokrashy and Jone, but dismissed claims against Post with leave to

amend. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, therefore Post should be dismissed.

If the allegations of the complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable

opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action against Paulsen, Nokrashy and Jone.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Paulsen, Nokrashy & Jone; 

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff three USM-285 forms, one

summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed December 15, 2009.

\\\\\

Case 2:09-cv-03465-FCD-GGH Document 15 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. Within twenty-eight days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete

the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the

court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;

b. One completed summons;

c. Three completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 1

above; and 

d. Four copies of the endorsed complaint filed December 15, 2009. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States

Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4

without payment of costs. 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the defendant Post be dismissed from

this action.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within seven days after service of the objections. The parties are

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 4, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh: ab

ngu3465.srv

Case 2:09-cv-03465-FCD-GGH Document 15 Filed 06/04/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRI NGUYEN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-3465 FCD GGH P

vs.

J. PAULSEN, et al.,

NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

 Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 1 completed summons form

 3 completed USM-285 forms

 4 copies of the December 15, 2009 

 Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:09-cv-03465-FCD-GGH Document 15 Filed 06/04/10 Page 3 of 3