Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04884/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04884-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ETC. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EDWARD F. McHALE (FL SBN190300) 

McHALE & SLAVIN, P.A. 

2855 PGA Boulevard 

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 

Telephone: 561-625-6575 

Fax: 561-625-6572 

Email: Litigation@mspatents.com

DAVID Z. RIBAKOFF (CA SBN 162925) 

THE PHAN LAW GROUP 

A Professional Law Corporation 

6080 Center Drive, Suite 610 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

Telephone: 310-242-5600 

Fax: 310-943-2126 

Email: dribakoff@lkplaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant GelTech Solutions, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SUSAN P. MARTIN and DAVID E. NEAL, 

 Plaintiffs, 

V. 

GELTECH SOLUTIONS, INC. and ROOTGEL 

WEST 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C09-04884 CW 

SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CHANGING TIME OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

TO TRANSFER OR STAY ACTION [Civil L.R. 

6-2] 

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs Susan P. Martin and David E. Neal and Defendant GelTech Solutions, Inc. 

(“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate pursuant to Civil 

L.R. 6-2 for a an order changing the briefing schedule on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, 

filed by Plaintiff on December 11, 2009 (the “Motion for Summary Judgment”), as follows: Opposition 

to the Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed and served on or before January 21, 2010. Any 

Case 4:09-cv-04884-CW Document 29 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 3
SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ETC. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

reply in support of the Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed and served on or before January 28, 

2010. 

Additionally, Plaintiffs Susan P. Martin and David E. Neal and Defendant GelTech Solutions, 

Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate pursuant to Civil 

L.R. 6-2 for a an order changing the briefing schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Transfer or Stay 

Action, filed by Plaintiff on December 7, 2009 (the “Motion to Transfer”), as follows: 

Opposition to the Motion to Transfer shall be filed and served on or before January 21, 2010. 

Any reply in support of the Motion shall be filed and served on or before January 28, 2010. 

This Stipulation is supported by the accompanying Declarations of Edward F. McHale and 

David Z. Ribakoff, submitted in compliance with Civil L.R. 6-2(a). In summary, the parties desire like 

extensions on their respective opposition briefing deadlines to facilitate settlement discussions between 

the parties and avoid potentially unnecessary expense or waste of judicial resources. 

IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 8, 2010 ZIMMERMAN & CRONEN, LLP 

 By: /s/ Michael James Cronen______________ 

 Michael James Cronen 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Susan P. Martin and 

David E. Neal 

Dated: January 8, 2010 McHALE & SLAVIN, P.A. 

 By: /s/ Edward McHale______________________ 

 Edward McHale 

Attorneys for Defendant GelTech Solutions, 

Inc. 

ORDER

Case 4:09-cv-04884-CW Document 29 Filed 01/08/10 Page 2 of 3
SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ETC. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. THE MOTIONS WILL BE DECIDED 

ON THE PAPERS. 

Dated: January 8, 2010 

 _________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:09-cv-04884-CW Document 29 Filed 01/08/10 Page 3 of 3