Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03074/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03074-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. and [Prop.] Order to Extend Dates in Case Case No. C-04-3074 SI -1-

ROBERT E. GREELEY, Esq. (#194289)

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT E. GREELEY

31 N. Second Street, Suite 300

San Jose, CA 95113

(408) 277-6800

(408) 993-1121 Fax

Email: robert@robertgreeleylaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Christina M. Lester

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CHRISTINA M. LESTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

HON. NORMAN Y. MINETA, SECRETARY )

OF TRANSPORTATION; JAMES SILK; )

)

)

 Defendants. )

 )

CASE No. C-04-3074 SI

E-FILING CASE

[AMENDED] STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND

DISCOVERY, PRETRIAL, AND

TRIAL DATES IN CASE

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND THROUGH THE PARTIES, subject to the approval of

the Court, that the dates specified in Judge Illston’s October 31, 2005 Pretrial Preparation Order,

as amended by the June 9, 2006 Stipulated Order, relating to discovery, pretrial, and trial are all

to be extended by approximately two months. The reason for extending the discovery dates is

that, although the parties have been cooperating in good faith, discovery has been more

complicated than anticipated, and the parties will require an additional two months in order to

complete it. The reason for extending the trial date is that dispositive motions will necessarily

need to be pushed into January, because of the extension on the discovery dates, and the existing

trial date of February 5 is earlier than the dispositive motions could fairly be heard, given the

extension on the discovery and dispositive motion dates. Thus, the following new dates will

supersede the dates in the June 9, 2006 Stipulated Order:

Case 3:04-cv-03074-SI Document 73 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:04-cv-03074-SI Document 74 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. and [Prop.] Order to Extend Dates in Case Case No. C-04-3074 SI -2-

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is November 22, 2006

DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS: December 4, 2006; REBUTTAL: December 8, 2006

Parties SHALL conform to Rule 26(a)(2).

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is December 21, 2006

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL be filed by January 12, 2007;

Opp. Due: January 26, 2007, Reply Due: February 2, 2007

and set for hearing no later than February 16, 2007 at 9:00 AM.

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: May 1, 2007 at 3:30 PM.

JURY TRIAL DATE: May 14, 2007 at 8:30 AM.

Courtroom 4, 17 floor. th

Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN V. RYAN KING, SNELL,

ROBERT E. GREELEY United States Attorney MILDWURM & FOX

DATED: August 15, 2006 /s/ 

ROBERT E. GREELEY

Attorney for Plaintiff Christina M. Lester

DATED: August 15, 2006 /s/ 

OWEN P. MARTIKAN

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Federal Defendants

DATED: August 15, 2006 /s/ 

CRAIG S. FOX

Attorney for Defendant James Silk

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August __, 2006 ________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

U.S. District Court Judge

Northern District of California

Case 3:04-cv-03074-SI Document 73 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:04-cv-03074-SI Document 74 Filed 08/16/06 Page 2 of 2