Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02389/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02389-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETE LIVINGSTON,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

KEYA MORGAN aka KEYARASH

MAZHARI aka KEYA MAZHARI,

KEYA GALLERY, NOVA WINES,

INC.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-2389 MMC (BZ)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANT NOVA WINES, INC.’S

MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Before me is defendant Nova Wines, Inc.’s motion for a

protective order. By order dated May 29, 2007, I granted

Nova’s application for an order shortening time to hear its

motion, and directed plaintiff to file his opposition by June

5 and Nova to file its reply by June 7. Neither was filed. 

Instead, the parties lodged an incoherent pair of letters

suggesting that they may - or may not - have reached agreement

on Nova’s proposed form of protective order. Despite

plaintiff’s assertion that a signed protective order would be

forwarded to the Court, none materialized. 

No opposition having been filed to Nova’s motion, and for

Case 3:06-cv-02389-MMC Document 161 Filed 06/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

good cause appearing, I GRANT the motion for a protective

order. The proposed protective order lodged with the Court 

[Docket No. 153, Exh. A to Nova’s Motion For a Protective

Order], however, fails to include the instruction that

challenges to confidentiality designations must comply with

Civil Local Rule 7 and, where applicable, Rule 79-5. In

addition, the proposed order fails to instruct that attempts

to file protected materials must comply with Rule 79-5. 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the model stipulated

protective order, which can be found on the Court’s website at

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ under the “Forms” link, is

adopted and will govern discovery in this case unless and

until the parties agree on an acceptable form of protective

order. The parties will electronically file a signed copy of

the stipulated protective order by 12:00 p.m. Friday, June 15,

2007.

Dated: June 11, 2007

 Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\LIVINGSTON\Order.Protective.Order.wpd

Case 3:06-cv-02389-MMC Document 161 Filed 06/11/07 Page 2 of 2