Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-06435/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-06435-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARNULFO NAVARRO SANCHEZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

GIURBINO, WARDEN, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:01-cv-06435-AWI-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 29)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On February 17, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DENIED, and that judgment be entered in favor of Respondent. These

Findings and Recommendation were served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty

(30) days from the date of service of that order. On March 10,

2005, Petitioner filed a motion to extend time. On March 29, 2005,

the court granted Petitioner an additional thirty (30) days within

which to respond. To date, Petitioner has not filed objections to

the Findings and Recommendation.

Case 1:01-cv-06435-AWI-DLB Document 32 Filed 05/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by

the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed February 17, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court ENTER judgment in favor of Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:01-cv-06435-AWI-DLB Document 32 Filed 05/25/05 Page 2 of 2