Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07067/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07067-109/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING PLAINTIFF MMCA GROUP,

LTD.’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT HP’S MOTION TO

EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF MMCA’S DAMAGES

EXPERT, RANDY SUGARMAN

12870320.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Frederick J. Geonetta (SBN 114824) 

fred@geonetta-frucht.com

Kenneth N. Frucht (SBN 178881) 

kfrucht@gmail.com

GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP

100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600 

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel: 415.421.4785 

Fax: 415.392.7973 

Robert A. Weikert (SBN 121146)

rweikert@nixonpeabody.com

Matthew J. Frankel (SBN 256633)

mfrankel@nixonpeabody.com

Sushila Chanana (SBN 254100)

schanana@nixonpeabody.com

NIXON PEABODY LLP

One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111–3600

Tel.: 415.984.8200 

Fax: 415.984.8300 

R. Mark Halligan (admitted pro hac vice)

rmhalligan@nixonpeabody.com

NIXON PEABODY LLP

300 South Riverside Plaza, 16th Floor 

Chicago, IL 60606 

Tel: 312.425.3900 

Fax: 312.425.3909 

Attorneys for Plaintiff MMCA Group, LTD.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MMCA GROUP, LTD., a Virginia corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, et al 

Defendants.

Civil Action No. CV 06-07067-MMC (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING

PLAINTIFF MMCA GROUP, LTD.’S 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT HP’S

MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE 

TESTIMONY OF MMCA’S DAMAGES 

EXPERT, RANDY SUGARMAN 

[No Hearing Required] 

Place: Courtroom7, Floor 19 

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

; DIRECTIONS

TO PLAINTIFF

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 886 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 3
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING PLAINTIFF MMCA GROUP,

LTD.’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT HP’S MOTION TO

EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF MMCA’S DAMAGES

EXPERT, RANDY SUGARMAN

12870320.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On January 29, 2010, Plaintiff MMCA Group, LTD. (“MMCA”) filed an Administrative 

Motion to Seal its Opposition to Defendant HP’s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of MMCA’s 

Damages Expert, Randy Sugarman (“Opposition”), the declaration of K. Frucht, and exhibits in 

support thereof. In support of its Administrative Motion, MMCA submitted the Declaration of 

Sushila Chanana. 

Having considered MMCA’s Administrative Motion and Sushila Chanana’s Declaration in 

Support thereof, and for good cause shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, the following materials

will be filed under seal:

1. Plaintiff MMCA’s Opposition to Defendant HP’s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of 

MMCA’s Damages Expert, Randy Sugarman; and

2. Declaration of K. Frucht, in Support of MMCA’s Opposition, and its accompanying

exhibits (A – T): 

a. Exhibit A 

b. Exhibit B 

c. Exhibit C 

d. Exhibit D 

e. Exhibit E 

f. Exhibit F 

g. Exhibit G 

h. Exhibit H 

i. Exhibit I

j. Exhibit J

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 886 Filed 03/02/10 Page 2 of 3
3

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING PLAINTIFF MMCA GROUP,

LTD.’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT HP’S MOTION TO

EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF MMCA’S DAMAGES

EXPERT, RANDY SUGARMAN

12870320.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

k. Exhibit K 

l. Exhibit L

m. Exhibit M 

n. Exhibit N 

o. Exhibit O 

p. Exhibit P 

q. Exhibit Q 

r. Exhibit R 

s. Exhibit S 

t. Exhibit T 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion is GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Whenever filed, in whole or in part, with the Court in this case, the material referenced above

shall be filed under seal:

Dated: ____________ __________________________________

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

United States District Court Judge

FURTHER

Plaintiff shall file in the public record, no later than March 9, 2010,

a redacted version of its opposition to the motion to exclude.

March 2, 2010

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 886 Filed 03/02/10 Page 3 of 3