Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06315/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06315-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Morgan v. City of San Jose 

U.S. Dist. Ct. – N. Cal. (San Jose) 

Case No. C-06-06315 JF 

Page 1 of 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. 

DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ. 

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL 

925 West Hedding Street 

San Jose, California 95126 

T: 408-553-0200 

F: 408-553-0203 

E: rpowell@rrpassociates.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MICHAEL MORGAN 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN JOSE DIVISION) 

MICHAEL MORGAN, ) Case Number: C-06-06315 JF 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER 

vs. ) REGARDING CHANGING 

 ) EXPERT DISCOVERY DATES 

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., ) 

Does 1-10, inclusive ) 

 ) 

 Defendants ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 The parties have previously submitted to Stipulations regarding efforts to settle the 

matter, and requesting that certain discovery dates related to expert witness exchange be 

extended. Unfortunately, the parties have been unable to reach settlement, and once again ask 

for a short extension (1 week), though at this time it is due to the fact that not all transcripts 

are in from the depositions of Persons Most Knowledgeable, which transcripts are necessary 

to be reviewed by the parties experts prior to preparing reports. Therefore, the parties request 

**E-filed 2/12/08*

Case 5:06-cv-06315-JF Document 26 Filed 02/12/08 Page 1 of 2
Morgan v. City of San Jose 

U.S. Dist. Ct. – N. Cal. (San Jose) 

Case No. C-06-06315 JF 

Page 2 of 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

the court agree with the following stipulation, made by the parties hereto, in consultation with 

their respective counsel, who do hereby stipulate as follows and respectfully request that 

Court order same. 

1. The last day for the parties’ initial disclosure of experts and expert reports shall be 

changed to February 15th, 2008. 

2. The last day for the parties’ rebuttal disclosure of experts and expert reports shall be 

changed to February 22nd, 2008. 

3. The last day for all expert related discovery shall be changed to March 14th, 2008. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Date: 2/5/08 __/S/ Robert Powell_______ 

 Robert Powell, Esq. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Date: 2/5/08 ___/S/ Robert Burchfiel____ 

 Robert Burchfiel, Esq. 

 Deputy City Attorney for 

 Defendants City of San Jose, 

Kirk Neimeyer, and Tyler Krauel 

ORDER 

Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, 

the court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties as an order of this court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: 2/____/08 ___________________________ 

 Judge Jeremy Fogel – U.S.D.C. 

 Northern California – San Jose 

12

Case 5:06-cv-06315-JF Document 26 Filed 02/12/08 Page 2 of 2