Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_05-cv-05121/USCOURTS-arwd-5_05-cv-05121-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

RONNIE KEYES PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 05-5121

 

DR. HOWARD; NURSE

SUSAN JOHNSON; and

NURSE RHONDA BRADLEY DEFENDANTS

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Ronnie Keyes filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July

11, 2005. His complaint was filed in forma pauperis (IFP). 

On April 7, 2006, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment (Doc. 27). On June

6, 2006, the undersigned entered an order (Doc. 30) directing Keyes to complete, sign and return

an attached questionnaire that would serve as his response to the summary judgment motion.

The plaintiff’s response to the questionnaire was to be returned by July 12, 2006. To

date, the plaintiff has failed to respond to the questionnaire. The court’s order and attached

questionnaire have not been returned as undeliverable. The order was mailed to the same address

as the court’s prior orders. Plaintiff has not informed the court of any change in his address.

Keyes has not sought an extension of time to respond to the summary judgment motion.

He has not otherwise communicated with the court.

I therefore recommend Keyes’ claims be dismissed on the grounds he has failed to

prosecute this action and comply with the order of the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The

parties have ten days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which to file

written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections

Case 5:05-cv-05121-JLH Document 31 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that

objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court.

DATED this 24th day of July 2006.

/s/ Beverly Stites Jones 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:05-cv-05121-JLH Document 31 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>