Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01397/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01397-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION– CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN

PHILIP A. MCLEOD, CASB 101101

NATHAN JASKOWIAK, CASB 248007

KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN

450 Pacific Avenue

San Francisco, California 94133

Telephone: (415)398-6000

Facsimile: (415)981-0136

-andGREGORY M. SUDBURY

Admitted Pro Hac

KODIE P. BENNION

Admitted Pro Hac

QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS, 

WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C.

2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800

Dallas, Texas 75201

Telephone: (214) 880-1878

Facsimile: (214) 871-2111

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

JONATHAN M. JENKINS, CASB 193011

LARA T. KAYAYAN, CASB 239384

JENKINS KAYAYAN LLP

444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1530

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (310) 984-6800

Facsimile: (310-984-6840

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE 

COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant.

No. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN

 The Hon. Kendall J. Newman

 Robert T. Matsui Courthouse

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

DEFENDANT’S THIRD-PARTY 

SUBPOENAS AND PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS TO 

THIRD-PARTIES AND MOTION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 2:13-cv-01397-JAM-KJN Document 69 Filed 07/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

After consideration of the Parties’ Stipulation Regarding Defendant’s Third-Party 

Subpoenas and Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Third-Parties and Motion for Protective 

Order (ECF No. 67), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

The hearing scheduled for August 20, 2015 on Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Defendants 

Subpoenas to Third Parties and Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 64) is vacated without 

prejudice to rescheduling, if necessary, upon Plaintiff’s request;

1

and

Defendant shall not attempt to enforce the non-party subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase & 

Co., “JPMorgan Mortgage Acceptance Corporation” and JPMorgan Securities, LLC or address 

the objections to those subpoenas until after a ruling is entered on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to 

Amend the Complaint (ECF No. 56).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 2015

 

1 If plaintiff no longer seeks to pursue its pending discovery motion after 

its pending motion for leave to amend its complaint has been resolved, it 

shall make a filing expressing its intent to withdraw the motion. If 

plaintiff intends to continue with this motion after resolution of the motion 

to amend, then it shall contact the undersigned’s courtroom deputy to schedule 

either a hearing date or an informal telephonic discovery conference before 

the undersigned.

Case 2:13-cv-01397-JAM-KJN Document 69 Filed 07/30/15 Page 2 of 2