Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06030/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06030-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

07685.1202/2507145.1 1 3:12-cv-06030-JCS

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)

mdl@severson.com

KALAMA M. LUI-KWAN (State Bar No. 242121)

kml@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-3344

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439

ERIC J. TROUTMAN (State Bar No. 229263)

ejt@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700

Irvine, CA 92612

Telephone: (949) 442-7110

Facsimile: (949) 442-7118

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MADELINE MARTIN, on behalf of

herself and all others similarly situated

Plaintiff,

vs.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant.

Case No.: 3:12-cv-06030-JCS

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

(L.R. 6-1(a))

WHEREAS, plaintiff Madeline Martin’s (“Plaintiff”) Proof of Service (Dkt. No. 5)

indicates that Plaintiff served the summons and complaint in this matter (“Complaint”) upon

defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) on December 4, 2012;

WHEREAS, Wells Fargo’s current deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the

Complaint is December 26, 2012;

WHEREAS, Wells Fargo has requested and Plaintiff has agreed to an extension of Wells

Fargo’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until January 18, 2013; and

Case 3:12-cv-06030-SI Document 9 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 2
07685.1202/2507145.1 2 3:12-cv-06030-JCS

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the proposed extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline

already fixed by Court order;

NOW THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through their

respective counsel, that the time for Wells Fargo to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint

shall be extended until and including January 18, 2013.

DATED: December 21, 2012 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &

BERNSTEIN, LLP

By: /s/ Daniel M. Hutchinson

Daniel M. Hutchinson

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MADELINE MARTIN

DATED: December 21, 2012 SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Kalama M. Lui-Kwan

Kalama M. Lui-Kwan

Attorneys for Defendant

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest

under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from

Daniel M. Hutchinson.

Dated: Jan. 2, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:12-cv-06030-SI Document 9 Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 2