Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-02076/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-02076-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES McCLOUGH,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

JIMMY KEENER, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:12-cv-02076-LJO-EPG-PC

 

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO 

DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE

(ECF No. 45.)

ORDER DISMISSING CASE IN ITS 

ENTIRETY, WITH PREJUDICE

ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

Charles McClough (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with this 

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. This case now proceeds on Plaintiff’s initial 

Complaint filed on December 26, 2012, against defendants Keener, Gonzales, Longoria, Flores, 

Cahlander, and Felix (collectively “Defendants”) for use of excessive force against Plaintiff in 

violation of the Eighth Amendment.1

On December 17, 2015, a Stipulation for voluntary dismissal with prejudice was filed 

with the Court by Defendants, containing the signatures of Plaintiff and counsel for 

Defendants. (ECF No. 45.) After consideration of the Stipulation, the Court hereby approves 

and orders the dismissal of this case as set forth.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Stipulation filed in this action on December 17, 2015, is APPROVED as set 

forth; 

 

1 On September 16, 2013, the Court dismissed all other claims and defendants from this action, 

based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim under § 1983. (ECF No. 8.)

Case 1:12-cv-02076-LJO-EPG Document 46 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. This case is DISMISSED in its entirety, with prejudice, each side to bear its own 

litigation costs and attorney’s fees; 

3. All pending motions are denied as moot; and

4. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 18, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-02076-LJO-EPG Document 46 Filed 12/18/15 Page 2 of 2