Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-00036/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-00036-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

CONTINUING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING

CASE NO: 09-CV-00036-RMW

MICHAEL A. LADRA (St. Bar No. 64037)

Email: mladra@wsgr.com

JAMES C. YOON (St. Bar No. 177155)

Email: jyoon@wsgr.com

STEFANI E. SHANBERG (St. Bar No. 206717)

Email: sshanberg@wsgr.com

ROBIN L. BREWER (St. Bar No. 253686)

Email: rbrewer@wsgr.com

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

650 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050

Telephone: (650) 493-9300

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim

Defendant FORTINET, INC.

RAGESH K. TANGRI (St. Bar No. 159497)

Email: rtangri@durietangri.com

DARALYN J. DURIE (St. Bar No. 169825)

Email: ddurie@durietangri.com

RYAN M. KENT (St. Bar No. 220441)

Email: rkent@durietangri.com

DURIE TANGRI LLP

217 Leidesdorff Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 362-6666

Facsimile: (415) 326-6300

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim

Plaintiffs PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.

AND PATRICK BROGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FORTINET, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., and

PATRICK R. BROGAN,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW

STIPULATED NOTICE OF

CONTINUANCE OF HEARING

DATE ON FORTINET’S SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION

[CURRENTLY NOTICED FOR

MARCH 5, 2010]

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

)

)

)

WHEREAS Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc. (“Fortinet”) and

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (“Palo Alto Networks”) have

agreed to a continuance pursuant to Local Rule 7-7 of the hearing date for Fortinet’s motion for

summary judgment of noninfringement;

WHEREAS no opposition has been filed;

WHEREAS Palo Alto Networks believes Fortinet’s motion is properly heard after the

parties have briefed claim construction issues in this matter;

AND ORDER *E-FILED - 2/12/10*

Case 5:09-cv-00036-RMW Document 50 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

CONTINUING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING

CASE NO: 09-CV-00036-RMW

-2- 3891075_1

WHEREAS the parties have agreed upon a schedule for claim construction and summary

judgment briefing in this matter, and the parties will propose the same to the Court in the form of

a Joint Subsequent Case Management Conference Statement in advance of the Subsequent Case

Management Conference scheduled before this Court on March 5, 2010; and

WHEREAS the parties have agreed that if there are multiple summary judgment motions

to be heard on the date upon which Fortinet’s motion ultimately comes before the Court,

Fortinet’s motion filed on January 18, 2010 and refiled on January 26, 2010, shall be the first

summary judgment motion heard by the Court to the extent that such ordering is acceptable to

the Court.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective

counsel undersigned, that:

The hearing on Fortinet’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement shall be

continued to the date of the claim construction hearing set by the Court in this matter, or such

other date as the Court prefers following claim construction briefing in this matter.

Dated: February 11, 2010 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg

Stefani E. Shanberg

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim

Defendant FORTINET, INC.

Dated: February 11, 2010 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Ryan M. Kent

Ryan M. Kent

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim

Plaintiffs PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.

AND PATRICK BROGAN

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________________ ____________________________

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

2/12/10

Case 5:09-cv-00036-RMW Document 50 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

CONTINUING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING

CASE NO: 09-CV-00036-RMW

-3- 3891075_1

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I, Stefani E. Shanberg, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being

used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Ryan

M. Kent of Durie Tangri LLP has concurred in this filling

Dated: February 11, 2010 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg

Stefani E. Shanberg

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim

Defendant FORTINET, INC.

Case 5:09-cv-00036-RMW Document 50 Filed 02/12/10 Page 3 of 3