Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

 

This document relates to:

ALL ACTIONS 

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Master File 

No. CV-07-5944 SC

MDL No. 1917

ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS

TO SPECIAL MASTER'S

REPORT,

RECOMMENDATIONS AND

TENTATIVE RULINGS

The Special Master in the above matter has rendered his

Report, Recommendations, and Tentative Rulings Regarding

Defendants' Motions to Dismiss dated February 5, 2010. Docket No.

597. The Court has been notified that Defendants object to the

Special Master's Report, Recommendations, and Tentative Rulings. 

In accordance with the Order Appointing Special Master, Docket No.

302, the Court ORDERS as follows: 

Defendants in the direct action may file one joint set of

objections to the Special Master's Report, Recommendations, and

Tentative Rulings not to exceed twenty (20) pages. Defendants who

filed separate motions to dismiss raising matters individual to

them may file separate objections not to exceed five (5) pages. 

Objections should include requests, if appropriate, to modify the

Special Master's Report, Recommendations, and Tentative Rulings,

and Defendants should not file separate motions to modify.

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 598 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -2-

Defendants in the indirect action may file one joint set of

objections to the Special Master's Report, Recommendations, and

Tentative Rulings not to exceed twenty (20) pages. Defendants who

filed separate motions to dismiss the indirect complaint raising

matters individual to them may file separate objections not to

exceed five (5) pages. Objections should include requests, if

appropriate, to modify the Special Master's Report,

Recommendations, and Tentative Rulings, and Defendants should not

file separate motions to modify. 

Plaintiffs may file a response to each joint set of

objections not to exceed fifteen (15) pages, and Plaintiffs may

respond to each individually filed set of objections not to exceed

three (3) pages. Responses should include requests to adopt, if

appropriate, the Special Master's Report, Recommendations, and

Tentative Rulings. Plaintiffs should not file separate motions to

adopt. Responses will be due seven (7) days after the deadline

for the objections.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 8, 2010

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 598 Filed 02/08/10 Page 2 of 2