Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01657/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01657-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY MARSHALL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1657 DFL PAN P

vs.

DEPUTY CASTRO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 22, 2006, the magistrate judge filed an order and findings and

recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty

days. The findings and recommendations recommended granting defendant Headley’s motion

for judgment on the pleadings and also dismissing defendant Solano County Sheriff from the

action for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted as to both

defendants. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01657-AK Document 137 Filed 03/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 22, 2006, are adopted in full.

2. Defendant Headley’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted.

3. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Solano County Sheriff are dismissed

without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

DATED: March 2, 2007

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

/mars1657.805(3)

Case 2:04-cv-01657-AK Document 137 Filed 03/05/07 Page 2 of 2