Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00866/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00866-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON BROWN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-0866 FCD EFB P

vs.

DIANA K. BUTLER, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

__________________________/

On July 25, 2007, petitioner filed a request for

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed July 10,

2007, granting respondent’s motion to dismiss on the ground that

the petition contains both exhausted and unexhausted claims. In

said order, the magistrate judge directed petitioner, within 30

days of the date of the order, to request a stay of the action 

to hold his exhausted claims in abeyance while he presents his

unexhausted-due process claim to the state courts, or if no such

request was made, the magistrate judge held that the court would

dismiss the petition with leave to file an amended petition

containing only the exhausted claims.

Case 2:05-cv-00866-FCD-EFB Document 72 Filed 08/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s

orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to

law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it

does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration,

the order of the magistrate judge filed July 10, 2007, is

affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 DATED: August 20, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-00866-FCD-EFB Document 72 Filed 08/21/07 Page 2 of 2