Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03843/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03843-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

*E-filed 11/16/06*

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MEMRY CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

KENTUCKY OIL TECHNOLOGY, N.V.,

PETER BESSELINK, MEMORY METALS

HOLLAND, B.V.,

Defendants. 

KENTUCKY OIL TECHNOLOGY, N.V.,

Counterclaimant,

v.

MEMRY CORPORATION and

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION,

Counterdefendants. /

Case No. C04-03843 RMW (HRL)

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

KENTUCKY OIL'S REQUEST FOR

AUGMENTATION OF RECORD AND

RECONSIDERATION 

Re: Docket No. 225

On September 13, 2006, Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V. (KOT) filed a request that this

court allow augmentation of the record and reconsider a portion of its September 6, 2006

discovery ruling. KOT concluded its request by stating "in the event that the Court wishes to

consider Kentucky Oil's request, Kentucky Oil respectfully asks the Court to issue an Order 

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 245 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

stating that it is considering such request and that the parties' time for objecting to the

September 6 Order will not begin to run until the Court rules on the request." The court issued

no such order. The terms of KOT's request effectively included an expiration date: the request

was withdrawn upon the filing of a formal objection with Judge Whyte on September 18. This

court concludes that the request for action from it was mooted by the filing of the objection with

Judge Whyte. KOT's request to this court to augment the record and reconsider its September 6

order is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 11/16/06 ____________________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 245 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

THIS SHALL CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS ORDER WILL BE SENT TO:

Michael H. Bierman mbierman@luce.com, 

William J. Cass WCass@CantorColburn.com, 

Kimberly K. Dodd kdodd@foley.com, rbarcena@foley.com 

Nancy J. Geenen ngeenen@foleylaw.com, rbarcena@foleylaw.com 

Benjamin J. Holl benjamin.holl@dbr.com, jeanette.juniel@dbr.com 

Thomas J Mango tmango@cantorcolburn.com 

David B. Moyer dmoyer@foley.com, jpung@foley.com; smurthy@foley.com;

mlagdameo@foley.com 

Nicola A. Pisano npisano@luce.com 

Charles A. Reid , III charles.reid@dbr.com, kristi.baughman@dbr.com; april.miller@dbr.com;

chris.lorange@dbr.com; ioana.mondescu@dbr.com 

Andrew C Ryan Ryan@CantorColburn.com, 

Jeffrey David Wexler jwexler@luce.com, tdelpomar@luce.com 

* Counsel are responsible for providing copies of this order to co-counsel.

Dated: 11/16/06 /s/ JMM 

 Chambers of Magistrate Judge Lloyd

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 245 Filed 11/16/06 Page 3 of 3