Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01871/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01871-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

Zarate v. DS Services of America, Inc.

Case No. 5:15-cv-01871 NC

Stipulated Dismissal With Prejudice; Order

B. James Fitzpatrick (SBN: 129056)

Samuel Forbes-Roberts (SBN: 286586)

FITZPATRICK, SPINI & SWANSTON 

555 S. Main Street

Salinas, CA 93901

Telephone: (831) 755-1311

Facsimile: (831) 755-1319

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Carlos Zarate

SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP

Catherine M. Dacre (SBN: 141988)

560 Mission Street, 31st Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 397-2823

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549

Duwayne A. Carr (SBN: 299136)

333 South Hope Street, Suite 3900

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 270-9600

Facsimile: (213) 270-9601

Attorneys for Defendant

DS Services of America, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS ZARATE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

DS SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC; and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

 Defendants.

Case No. 5:15-cv-01871 NC

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii); ORDER

State Court Complaint Filed: 10/01/2014

Notice of Removal Filed: 04/27/2015

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff Carlos Zarate on the one hand and Defendant 

DS Services of America, Inc. on the other hand, by and through their counsel of record and 

pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that the above-captioned action be 

dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own attorney fees and costs.

Case 5:15-cv-01871-NC Document 24 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

Zarate v. DS Services of America, Inc.

Case No. 5:15-cv-01871 NC

Stipulated Dismissal With Prejudice; Order

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: November 5, 2015

FITZPATRICK, SPINI & SWANSTON

By: /s/ Samuel Forbes-Roberts

B. James Fitzpatrick, Esq.

Samuel Forbes-Roberts, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: November 5, 2015

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: /s/ Duwayne A. Carr

Catherine M. Dacre, Esq.

Duwayne A. Carr, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice 

with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Dated: November 5, 2015 ________________________________

Honorable Judge Nathanael M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:15-cv-01871-NC Document 24 Filed 11/05/15 Page 2 of 2