Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01882/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01882-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation and Order Regarding Discovery (1:15-cv-01882-TLN-SMS)

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

MARC A. LEFORESTIER

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

JOHN W. KILLEEN, State Bar No. 258395

Deputy Attorney General (attorney for notice)

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 445-1968

Fax: (916) 324-8835

E-mail: John.Killeen@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendant California Highway Patrol

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETE HERRERA, LUPE HERRERA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL and 

DOES 1 to 100,

Defendants.

1:15-cv-01882-TLN-SMS

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING DISCOVERY 

[FED. R. CIV. P. 26]

Dept: 2, 15th Floor

Judge: Hon. Troy L. Nunley

Trial Date: None Set

Action Removed: December 17, 2015

Case 1:15-cv-01882-TLN-SAB Document 16 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation and Order Regarding Discovery (1:15-cv-01882-TLN-SMS)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 and Local Rule 143, all Plaintiffs and all 

Defendants in this action hereby stipulate that:

1. Today, February 29, 2016, Defendant California Highway Patrol (“CHP”) filed 

a motion to dismiss the operative first amended complaint (“Complaint”) or, alternatively, to stay 

this case, Dkt. Nos. 13 and 14;

2. CHP set its motion for hearing on May 5, 2016, which was the first date that 

was mutually available to counsel for the Plaintiffs and counsel for CHP;

3. The parties agree and submit that discovery in this case will only go forward if 

the Court both denies CHP’s motion to dismiss and denies CHP’s request to stay the case;

4. The parties agree and submit that it would preserve judicial and party resources 

not to prepare a discovery plan and joint status report or begin discovery until CHP’s motion is 

decided;

5. Therefore, the parties request that the Court continue the deadline for 

submitting a joint status report that includes the Rule 26(f) discovery plan until 30 days after the 

Court rules on CHP’s pending motion to dismiss or, alternatively, to stay this case.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February 29, 2016 KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

MARC A. LEFORESTIER

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

 /s/ John W. Killeen

JOHN W. KILLEEN

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendant California Highway 

Patrol

Case 1:15-cv-01882-TLN-SAB Document 16 Filed 03/02/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Stipulation and Order Regarding Discovery (1:15-cv-01882-TLN-SMS)

Dated: February 29, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN A. GERINGER

 /s/ Steven A. Geringer (signature used by 

permission granted 2/25/16)

STEVEN A. GERINGER

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Pete Herrera and 

Lupe Herrera

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that 

the deadline for the parties to confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and to prepare and 

submit to the Court a joint status report that includes the Rule 26(f) discovery plan shall be 30 

days after the Court rules on the CHP’s pending motion to dismiss the operative first amended 

complaint or, alternatively, to stay this case, Dkt. Nos. 13 and 14.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 29, 2016

Case 1:15-cv-01882-TLN-SAB Document 16 Filed 03/02/16 Page 3 of 3