Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01064/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01064-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Tony Hernandez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 11, 2016 the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 

Recommendations recommending denial of Defendant Martinez’s motion for summary judgment. 

The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that objections to 

the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day time frame has 

expired and no objections were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

TONY HERNANDEZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

A. MARTINEZ,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01064-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

Case 1:10-cv-01064-SAB Document 76 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on April 11, 2016, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant Martinez’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and 

3. The Court will issue a separate scheduling order setting this case for trial before the 

undersigned on Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendant Martinez. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 25, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01064-SAB Document 76 Filed 05/25/16 Page 2 of 2