Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04345/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04345-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDERICK SCHIFF,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

et al.,

Defendants. ___________________________________

NARDA GILLESPIE et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

et al.,

Defendants. ___________________________________

MARK OSUNA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C-03-4345 MMC

No. C-04-2261 MMC

No. C-04-2262 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

Case 3:03-cv-04345-MMC Document 185 Filed 12/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On December 16, 2005, plaintiffs electronically filed their joint opposition to

defendant Fred Lau’s motion for summary adjudication, and, on December 23, 2005,

plaintiffs electronically filed their consolidated joint opposition to the City and County of San

Francisco’s two motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs have violated General Order 45

and the Court’s standing orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later

than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one

paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and

. . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not

File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to

The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

The Court has previously ordered plaintiffs to provide chambers copies of other

documents. (See Order filed September 26, 2005.) The Court expects plaintiffs to comply

with the Court’s orders without being repeatedly reminded to do so.

Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

documents. The parties are hereby advised that if either party fails in the future to comply

with the Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Court may impose sanctions on the noncomplying party, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 29, 2005 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:03-cv-04345-MMC Document 185 Filed 12/29/05 Page 2 of 2