Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00777/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00777-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

C. GIBSON, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2:07-cv-00777-HDM-RAM

ORDER

On April 25, 2007, the plaintiff consented to the United State

Magistrate Judge’s consideration of this matter for all purposes

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). Thereafter, for unknown reasons

a second copy of the magistrate judge consent form was apparently

sent to the parties. The defendants consented to the jurisdiction

of the magistrate judge. The plaintiff, however, declined to

consent. Because of the inconsistency between the forms signed by

plaintiff on April 25, 2007, and on February 11, 2010, the

plaintiff will have until March 30, 2010, within which to advise

Case 2:07-cv-00777-CKD Document 56 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the court whether he does or does not consent to the referral of

this matter to the magistrate judge. In the event plaintiff elects

to not advise the court, the court will accept the original consent

and refer this matter to the magistrate judge. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: This 15th day of March, 2010.

____________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00777-CKD Document 56 Filed 03/15/10 Page 2 of 2