Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00276/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00276-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 245
Nature of Suit: Real Property Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY CO.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ELECTROLUX NORTH AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendant.

No. 2:23-cv-00276-CKD

ORDER

The parties filed a Joint Status Report on May 3, 2023, in which they indicated their 

willingness to participate in the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP) following 

exchange of initial disclosures. (ECF No. 7.) On May 17, 2023, the undersigned referred this 

case to VDRP. (ECF No. 8.) 

On February 2, 2024, the parties notified the court that the VDRP process had been 

completed but that the case had not settled. Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days of this 

order, the parties shall file an amended Joint Status Report with this court so that the court may 

enter a pretrial scheduling order. The amended Joint Status Report shall address the relevant 

portions of Local Rule 240(a). In the amended Joint Status Report, the parties may request a 

hearing for the purpose of entry of a pretrial scheduling order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

Case 2:23-cv-00276-CKD Document 10 Filed 02/29/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Within twenty-one days from the date of this order, the parties shall file an amended Joint 

Status Report addressing the following matters:

a. Service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and their scheduling;

f. The report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 outlining the 

proposed discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut−off dates for discovery 

and law and motion, and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;

h. Special procedures, if any;

i. Estimated trial time;

j. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the

simplicity or complexity of the proceedings;

k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including bankruptcy;

l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled;

m. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this 

matter.

Dated: February 29, 2024

21,USAA.0276

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:23-cv-00276-CKD Document 10 Filed 02/29/24 Page 2 of 2