Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-02544/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-02544-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK GOINGS,

Plaintiff, No. C 08-2544 PJH

v. AMENDMENT RE ORDER

GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SGT. ELLIOT, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

The court issued its order granting summary judgment in defendants’ favor on March

19, 2010. On March 22, 2010, plaintiff’s counsel filed a letter with the court noting that the

court’s March 19 order included a statement (at footnote 1) striking plaintiff’s opposition

brief based upon plaintiff’s late filing of the opposition papers, in direct contravention of the

court’s prior January 25, 2010 notice, which ruled that plaintiff’s opposition brief would not

be stricken as untimely. Plaintiff accordingly seeks a correction to the summary judgment

order, in order to reflect the court’s earlier finding. 

To the extent plaintiff's counsel seeks correction of the court’s ruling, in order to

reflect the fact that plaintiff’s opposition brief was not filed inexcusably late, the court hereby

GRANTS plaintiff's counsel's request, and hereby CLARIFIES and AMENDS the March 19,

2010 order to reflect the fact that, consistent with the court’s earlier filed January 25 notice,

plaintiff’s opposition brief is not stricken as untimely. To that end, footnote 1 of the March

19 order is accordingly STRICKEN. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 29, 2010 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:08-cv-02544-PJH Document 70 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 1