Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02348/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02348-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES M. GIBSON,

DARLENE EARLY,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-04-2348 DFL DAD PS

vs.

GEORGE W. BUSH, 

JOHN KERRY,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On December 14, 2004, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiffs and which contained notice to plaintiffs that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. On January 26,

2005, the findings and recommendations were re-served on both plaintiffs at their last known

address. Plaintiff Charles Gibson filed objections to the findings and recommendations on

January 3, 2005. No objections were filed by plaintiff Darlene Early.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case and has considered plaintiff’s

Case 2:04-cv-02348-DFL-DAD Document 9 Filed 06/17/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. The court has

determined that there is no need to modify the findings and recommendations based on the points

raised in plaintiff’s objections.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2004, are adopted in

full; and

2. Plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction.

DATED: 6/10/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02348-DFL-DAD Document 9 Filed 06/17/05 Page 2 of 2