Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01401/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01401-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

Shubin v. Farinelli Fine Antiques – No. 15-CV-1401 LB

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Adam G. Slote (SBN 137465)

Robert D. Links (SBN 61914)

Marglyn E. Paseka (SBN 276054)

SLOTE, LINKS & BOREMAN, LLP

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400

San Francisco, CA 94111-3619

Telephone: (415) 393-8001

Fax: (415) 294-4545

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STEVE SHUBIN and KATHY SHUBIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

STEVE SHUBIN and KATHY SHUBIN,

 Plaintiffs,

 vs.

FARINELLI FINE ANTIQUES

CORPORATION; DORIAN LISBONA;

EFRAIM SHOUA; SHOUA LISBONA, LLC;

and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

 Defendants.

____________________________________

FARINELLI FINE ANTIQUES

CORPORATION; DORIAN LISBONA; and

EFRAIM SHOUA,

Cross-Claimants

vs.

STEVE SHUBIN and KATHY SHUBIN, and

SHAUL HAROSH; inclusive,

Cross-Defendants

No. 15-CV-01401 LB

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT

TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Hon. Laurel Beeler

Date:

Time:

Complaint Filed: January 30, 2015

Action Removed: March 26, 2015

Counterclaims Filed: April 2, 2015

Trial Date: August 15, 2016

Case 3:15-cv-01401-LB Document 94 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 2
Shubin v. Farinelli Fine Antiques – No. 15-CV-1401 LB

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

THE COURT HAVING CONSIDERED THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR

DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT (Rule 41 (a) (ii)), and having reviewed the

pleadings and other papers on file in this case,

AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The motion is GRANTED, and the action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 41 (a) (ii),

subject to the Court’s continued jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement

between the parties.

2. By stipulation of the Parties, the Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to

enforce a settlement agreement between the parties.

3. The matter of costs and attorney’s fees is governed by the Parties’ settlement

agreement.

Dated: __________________

 ______________________________

 Hon. Laurel Beeler

 United States Magistrate Judge

May 4, 2016

Case 3:15-cv-01401-LB Document 94 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 2