Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-88-01054/USCOURTS-ca10-88-01054-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 

---

1 ' 'I 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth C,ir~nit 

SOUTHWEST DRILLING, an Oklahoma 

general partnership, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

and 

SOUTHWESTERN DRILLING COMPANY, an Oklahoma 

corporation: SOUTHWESTERN DRILLING MANAGEMENT 

COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation, general 

partners of Southwestern Drilling: ROGER M. 

BERNSTEIN, an individual: ROBERT GEE, an 

individual: DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE: JOHN L. 

WRIGHT, an individual: WILLIAM R. DIXON, 

an individual: JOHN M. YOECKEL, an individual: 

CAPITAL CONCEPTS INVESTMENT CORP., a 

California corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MYRON R. PARR and GARY L. WEISS, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

v. 

BILL G. SCHONES, 

Third-Party-Defendant. 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

) . 

) 

MAR O 21989 

>> ROBERT L. HOECKER > Clerk 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) No. 88-1054 

)(D.C. No. 82-2308P) 

) (W.D. Okla.) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Before MOORE, ANDERSON, and EBEL, Circuit Judges. 

*This order and 

be cited, or 

for purposes of 

res judicata, 

judgment has no precedential value and shall not 

used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except 

establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, 

or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

Appellate Case: 88-1054 Document: 010110023883 Date Filed: 03/02/1989 Page: 1 
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The cause is therefore ordered 

In light of the court's decision in Lewis v. B.F. Goodrich 

Co., 850 F.2d 641 (10th Cir. 1988) and Federal Savings and Loan 

Insurance Corp. v. Huff, 851 F.2d 316 (10th Cir. 1988), appellant 

was given thirty days in which to secure a certification pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), or an order or judgment adjudicating all 

remaining claims. 

court's order. 

Appellant has failed to comply with this 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 88-1054 Document: 010110023883 Date Filed: 03/02/1989 Page: 2