Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-00744/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-00744-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26:7422 IRS: Refund Taxes

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHYLLIS CARR,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-00744-WHO 

NOTICE TO PARTIES RE FAILURE 

TO PROSECUTE

Re: Dkt. No. 10

On April 6, 2020, defendants filed a partial motion to dismiss and motion for more definite 

statement. See Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss and Motion for More Definite Statement 

[Dkt. No. 10]. On April 15, 2020, I granted parties' stipulated request to extend initial case 

management requirements to 30 days following my resolution of defendants' pending motion. See 

Modified Order Granting Extension of Dates [Dkt. No. 12]. Their stipulated request did not seek 

extension of briefing deadlines; pro se plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion was due on 

April 20, 2020 and defendants' reply was due April 27, 2020. As of today's date, no opposition 

has been filed. Plaintiff shall file her opposition no later than May 5, 2020, or otherwise show 

good cause why her case should not be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2020

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

Case 3:20-cv-00744-WHO Document 13 Filed 04/28/20 Page 1 of 1