Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-04201/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-04201-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11 

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 12 LLC, 

13 Plaintiff, 

14 v.

15 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, 

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS 

16 COMPANY L.P., SPRINT SPECTRUM 

L.P., SPRINT SOLUTIONS INC., 17

Defendants.

18

19 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,

20 LLC,

21 Plaintiff, 

22 v. 

23 APPLE, INC., 

24 Defendants. 

25 

26 

27 

28

Case Nos. C-13-04513 RMW, C-13-04201 JD, C13-04202 SI, C-13-04203 MMC, C-13-04204 SI, 

C-13-04205 WHO, C-13-04206 EJD, C-13-04207 

JSW, C-13-03587 DMR 

ORDER ASSIGNING JUDGE TO 

CONSIDER CONSOLIDATION OR 

RELATION AND, IF APPROPRIATE, TO 

BE PRESIDING JUDGE

ORDER ASSIGNING JUDGE TO CONSIDER 

CONSOLIDATION OR RELATION AND, IF 

APPROPRIATE, TO BE PRESIDING JUDGE 

- 1 - 

Case 5:13-cv-04201-RMW Document 134 Filed 07/28/14 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

1 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 

LLC, 2

Plaintiff, 3

v.

4 

FACEBOOK, INC., 5

Defendants.

6

7 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,

8 LLC,

9 Plaintiff, 

10 v. 

11 FOURSQUARE LABS, INC., 

12 Defendants. 

13 

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,

14 LLC, 

15 Plaintiff, 

16 v. 

17 GROUPON, INC., 

18 Defendants. 

19 

20 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 

LLC, 

21 Plaintiff, 

22 

v.

23 LIVINGSOCIAL, INC., 

24 Defendants.

25 

26 

27 

28

ORDER ASSIGNING JUDGE TO CONSIDER 

CONSOLIDATION OR RELATION AND, IF 

APPROPRIATE, TO BE PRESIDING JUDGE 

- 2 - 

Case 5:13-cv-04201-RMW Document 134 Filed 07/28/14 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

1 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 

LLC, 2

3 

v.

4

TWITTER, INC., 5

6

Plaintiff, 

Defendants. 

7 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,

8 LLC,

9 Plaintiff, 

10 v. 

11 YELP, INC., 

12 Defendants. 

13 

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,

14 LLC, 

15 Plaintiff, 

16 v. 

17 MILLENIAL MEDIA, INC., 

18 Defendants. 

19 

20 Pursuant to the agreement of the originally assigned judges in the above-captioned cases 

21 made June 19, 2014, the Assignment Committee designated District Judge Ronald M. Whyte to 

22 determine whether the cases should either be consolidated through claim construction or related and, 

23 if either consolidated or related, to preside over the consolidated or related cases. 

24 

25 Dated: July XX, 2014 

26 Claudia Wilken

Chief United States District Judge

27 

28

ORDER ASSIGNING JUDGE TO CONSIDER 

CONSOLIDATION OR RELATION AND, IF 

APPROPRIATE, TO BE PRESIDING JUDGE - 3 - 

 July 28, 2014

Case 5:13-cv-04201-RMW Document 134 Filed 07/28/14 Page 3 of 3