Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-02034/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-02034-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07cv2034

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIMITRI VALERYEVICH

TATARINOV,

Petitioner,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN

DIEGO; OFFICE OF THE CHIEF

COUNSEL, DEPT. OF HOMELAND

SECURITY; U.S. ATTORNEY,

SOUTHERN DISTRICT; ICE

DETENTION & REMOVAL UNIT,

Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 07cv2034-L(NLS)

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

PETITIONER’S (1) MOTION FOR

STAY OF REMOVAL; (2) MOTION

TO RECONSIDER; AND (3)

MOTION TO AMEND 

Petitioner Dimitri Valeryevich Tatarinov, represented by counsel, filed a Petition for Writ

of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. When the case was transferred to this court pursuant

to the low number rule, Civil Local Rule 401.(d), the following motions were pending: (1)

Petitioner’s Motion for Stay of Removal During the Pendency of Application for Writ of Habeas

Corpus, filed November 4, 2007; (2) Petitioner’s Motion to Consolidate This Case with Case

No. 07cv2033-L(NLS), filed November 4, 2007; (3) Motion to Reconsider Order Granting

/ / / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / / /

Case 3:07-cv-02034-L-NLS Document 22 Filed 11/27/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The court notes all of Petitioner’s motions failed to comply with Civil Local Rule

7.1. Although the court is not denying Petitioner’s motions on this ground, Petitioner is

admonished that any further pleadings which fail to comply with Civil Local Rules or Electronic

Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures may be stricken and may lead to penalties

pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1.

2 The motion for stay was erroneously filed in case no. 07cv2033-L(POR). 

Petitioner is ordered to re-file it in the instant case.

2 07cv2034

Enlargement of Time to File Respondent’s Return, filed November 11, 2007; and (4) Petitioner’s

Motion to Amend Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, filed November 14, 2007.1

Petitioner’s Motion for Stay of Removal During the Pendency of Application for Writ of

Habeas Corpus is DENIED AS MOOT. Since filing this motion Petitioner has amended the

Petition to add Respondents in whose custody Petitioner is currently held. Subsequently,

Petitioner filed a new motion for stay.2

Petitioner’s Motion to Consolidate This Case with Case No. 07cv2033-L(NLS) is the

subject of a separate order granting the motion.

Motion to Reconsider Order Granting Enlargement of Time to File Respondent’s Return

is DENIED AS MOOT. Petitioner is correct in that the Order Granting Motion for an

Enlargement of Time to File Respondent’s Return, filed November 9, 2007, erroneously states

that “Petitioner has not requested a stay of deportation.” However, because Petitioner has filed

an amended petition which adds respondents and, as stated in a separate order granting

Petitioner’s motion to consolidate, Petitioner is ordered to file a consolidated petition, a new

briefing schedule is required regardless of Respondent Superior Court of the State of California,

County of San Diego’s prior request for an extension of time.

Petitioner’s Motion to Amend Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is

DENIED AS MOOT because Petitioner subsequently filed an amended petition pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) without leave of court prior to the service of a responsive pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 27, 2007

M. James Lorenz

United States District Court Judge

Case 3:07-cv-02034-L-NLS Document 22 Filed 11/27/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 07cv2034

COPY TO: 

HON. NITA L. STORMES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ALL PARTIES/COUNSEL

Case 3:07-cv-02034-L-NLS Document 22 Filed 11/27/07 Page 3 of 3