Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01379/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01379-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

PROPOSED ORDER - CASE NO. 2:05-CV-1379 

KEVIN J. TULLY (S.B. # 079559) 

LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN J. TULLY 

411 Borel Avenue, Suite 505 

San Mateo, California 94402 

Telephone: (650) 377-0708 

Facsimile: (650) 377-0606 

THOMAS M. RIORDAN (S.B. # 176364) 

JOHN V. BERLINSKI (S.B.# 208537) 

REUBEN D. WILSON (S.B.# 212563) 

MOLLY J. MAGNUSON (S.B. # 229444) 

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

400 South Hope Street 

Los Angeles, California 90071-2899 

Telephone: (213) 430-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 

Attorneys for Defendant 

VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CAROLE TREW, on behalf of herself and 

all others similarly situated, and on behalf 

of the General Public as a Private 

Attorney General; LOREN FUNK, on 

behalf of himself and all others similarly 

situated; and JUDITH AND MATTHEW 

WESLEY MARX, on behalf of 

themselves and others similarly situated. 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

VOLVO CARS OF NORTH 

AMERICA, LLC, and DOES 1-100, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:05-CV-1379-DFL-EFB 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; ORDER 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto previously stipulated through their respective 

counsel that the deadline for defendant Volvo Cars of North America, LLC (“Volvo”) to 

respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint was extended up to and including May 

Case 2:05-cv-01379-MCE -EFB Document 73 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

2 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

PROPOSED ORDER - CASE NO. 2:05-CV-1379 

26, 2006; 

WHEREAS, after the parties participated in settlement negotiations with the 

assistance of a mediator, they subsequently stipulated to further extend the deadline for 

Volvo to respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint to June 30, 2006, to allow 

sufficient time to negotiate a settlement, which extension was approved by this Court; 

WHEREAS, as the parties were working in cooperation on the preparation of a 

settlement agreement, they subsequently stipulated to further extend the deadline for 

Volvo to respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint to September 15, 2006, to allow 

sufficient time to negotiate a settlement, which extension was approved by this Court 

WHEREAS, the parties continue to work in cooperation on the preparation of a 

settlement agreement, most of the terms of which have been negotiated, and numerous 

drafts of which have been exchanged; 

THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rules 83-143 and 6-144, the parties hereto, 

through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate that Volvo shall have up to 

and including October 31, 2006 to respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. The 

parties hereby respectfully request an Order of the Court granting the extension to which 

they have agreed. 

Dated: September ___, 2006 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By 

Molly J. Magnuson 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Volvo Cars of North America, LLP 

Dated: September ___, 2006 

FAZIO | MICHELETTI LLP 

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & 

BERNSTEIN, LLP 

By 

Jeffrey L. Fazio 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Trew, Funk, Marx 

and the proposed Class 

Case 2:05-cv-01379-MCE -EFB Document 73 Filed 09/15/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

3 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

PROPOSED ORDER - CASE NO. 2:05-CV-1379 

ORDER 

In light of their current negotiation of a settlement agreement, of which final 

agreement is close to being reached, the parties have filed a stipulation extending the 

deadline for Defendant Volvo Cars of North America, LLC (“Volvo”) to respond to 

Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint until October 31, 2006. After full consideration of 

the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Volvo an extension 

of time to respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint up to and including October 31, 

2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 14, 2006 

______________________________ 

DAVID F. LEVI 

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01379-MCE -EFB Document 73 Filed 09/15/06 Page 3 of 3