Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00266/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00266-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOAQUIN MURILLO,

Plaintiff,

v.

K. HOLLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:15-cv-0266 KJM DB P

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Plaintiff alleges defendants’ use of the Guard One security check system violated his Eighth 

Amendment rights. On December 27, 2021, defendants filed a motion to lift the stay in this case 

and to dismiss it. Plaintiff has not filed a response. 

Local Rule 230(l) states that a party shall file an opposition to a motion “not more than 

twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of the motion.” If a party does not oppose the 

motions, he must file a statement of non-opposition. If the party fails “to file an opposition or to 

file a statement of no opposition,” the court may consider that failure to be a waiver of any 

opposition to the granting of the motion and may impose sanctions. 

Plaintiff will be given additional time to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition 

to the motions to lift the stay and to dismiss. If he fails to do so, this court may recommend this 

action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. 

Case 1:15-cv-00266-DC-SCR Document 130 Filed 03/28/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within 30 days of the filed date of this 

order, plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motions to 

lift the stay and to dismiss. If plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this court may recommend 

this action be dismissed. 

Dated: March 28, 2022

DLB:9

DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/muri0266.mtd oppo eot

Case 1:15-cv-00266-DC-SCR Document 130 Filed 03/28/22 Page 2 of 2