Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01819/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01819-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD COLE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

M. SPAETH, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-01819-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 15)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Doc. 14)

Plaintiff, Donald Cole (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On April 10, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed on or before April 26, 2007. 

On April 23,2007, plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:06-cv-01819-AWI-DLB Document 28 Filed 07/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis. In the

objections, Plaintiff primarily complains that this case is not

proceeding because he has not been provided 285 USM Forms from

the court. A review of the docket reveals that these forms have

now been provided to Plaintiff and Defendants have been served

with the complaint. Thus, the issues raised in the objections

appear to be resolved.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 10, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief,

filed March 23, 2007, is DENIED, without prejudice, as PREMATURE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01819-AWI-DLB Document 28 Filed 07/26/07 Page 2 of 2