Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-91-06082/USCOURTS-ca10-91-06082-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

u .J'~.!of1ip.,.,.1s UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS m enei Circuit 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

CECIL COOPER, JR., ) 

) 

Plaintiff-Appellant, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

BILL ROBERSON; BUD DAVIS, ) 

) 

Defendants-Appellees. ) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

SEP O G 1991 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 91-6082 

(D.C, No. CIV-91-159-W) 

(W,D. Okla.) 

Before SEYMOUR, EBEL, Circuit Judges, and BABCOCK,** District 

Judge. 

**Honorable Lewis T. Babcock, District Judge, 

District Court for the District of Colorado, 

designation. 

United States 

sitting by 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the district court 

dismissing his complaint on the grounds of collateral estoppel as 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 91-6082 Document: 010110089363 Date Filed: 09/06/1991 Page: 1 
I 

to claims previously raised, and as frivolous pursuant to 28 

u.s.c. § 1915(d) as to all other claims. 

Upon review of the record and this court's previous order, 

Cooper v. Roberson, Unpublished No. 90-6066 (10th Cir. filed 

August 7, 1990), we affirm substantially for the reasons given by 

the district court in its Order of Dismissal, February 12, 1991. 

In addition, we will not consider issues plaintiff raises for the 

first time on appeal, which were not presented first to the 

district court. Baker v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co., 788 F.2d 650, 

663 (10th Cir. 1986). 

The judgment of the United States District Court for the 

Western District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. 

Entered for the Court 

Stephanie K. Seymour 

Circuit Judge 

2 

Appellate Case: 91-6082 Document: 010110089363 Date Filed: 09/06/1991 Page: 2