Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00963/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00963-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 195
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This amended order amends and supercedes the order filed 1

September 13, 2007.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MT. SHASTA TITLE AND ESCROW ) 2:07-cv-963-GEB-EFB

COMPANY, a California corporation, ) 

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) AMENDED ORDER1

)

PENNBROOK HOMES, an Oregon )

corporation; CITY OF MOUNT SHASTA, )

a California municipal corporation;)

and DOES 1 through 20, )

)

Defendants. )

___________________________________)

)

PENNBROOK HOMES, an Oregon )

corporation; )

)

Cross-Complainant, )

)

v. )

)

CITY OF MOUNT SHASTA, a California )

municipal corporation, )

)

Cross-Defendant. )

)

The Judge’s review of the docket in this action indicated

that the Clerk’s default judgment against Cross-Defendant City of

Mount Shasta on Cross-Complainant Pennbrook Homes’ cross-complaint

should not have entered because Pennbrook Homes appeared not to have 

properly served the City of Mount Shasta.

Case 2:07-cv-00963-GEB-EFB Document 32 Filed 09/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Earlier today, Pennbrook Homes and the City of Mount Shasta

filed a Stipulation to Set Aside Default Judgment on Cross-Complaint,

in which they seek a court order directing “the Clerk of the Court

[to] vacate the entry of default and default judgment heretofore

entered in this matter by Pennbrook Homes against the City of Mt.

Shasta.” Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court shall vacate the default

judgment entered against Cross-Defendant City of Mount Shasta in this

action. 

Further, Pennbrook Homes and its counsel are ordered to

show cause (“OSC”) in a writing to be filed no later than 2:00

p.m. on September 24, 2007 why sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 16(f) and/or the Court’s inherent sanction authority

should not be imposed for misleading the court in a declaration and a

status report filed in this action. If a hearing is requested on the

OSC, that request is to be stated in the response. 

The status conference scheduled for September 17, 2007 is

rescheduled for hearing to commence at 10:00 a.m. on October 29, 2007.

If the OSC is heard, that hearing will occur at the time the status

conference is scheduled to commence.

The Clerk of the Court shall serve John Sullivan Kenny

and Mark D. Norcross (Kenny, Snowden & Norine, P.O. Box 994608,

Redding, CA 96099-4609) with a copy of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-00963-GEB-EFB Document 32 Filed 09/14/07 Page 2 of 2