Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01005/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01005-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 05:552 Right to Privacy Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GAVIN MEHL,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTRYWIDE BANK, NA, et. al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:19-cv-1005 TLN CKD (PS)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed August 31, 2020 plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty 

days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now 

expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the 

court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 

being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 

the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

/////

/////

Case 2:19-cv-01005-TLN-CKD Document 11 Filed 11/10/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 

1991).

Dated: November 10, 2020

/cd

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:19-cv-01005-TLN-CKD Document 11 Filed 11/10/20 Page 2 of 2