Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02405/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02405-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 45:51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARYL STINCHFIELD, 

Plaintiff,

v.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,

Defendant. 

CIV-S-06-2405 DFL/DAD

ORDER

Daryl Stinchfield filed a motion for a temporary restraining

order to prevent Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”)

from taking disciplinary action against him. The Court, after

reviewing the motion and the opposition, finds that oral argument

would not be of assistance. It is apparent from the opposition

that this is not an emergency matter justifying extraordinary

relief. Moreover, plaintiff has failed to show either a

likelihood of success on the merits of the underlying

disciplinary dispute or that disciplinary action by Union Pacific

would result in irreparable injury. For these reasons, the court

DENIES the motion for a temporary restraining order.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 3, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-02405-DFL-DAD Document 12 Filed 11/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 

/s/ David F. Levi 

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-02405-DFL-DAD Document 12 Filed 11/03/06 Page 2 of 2