Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-02156/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-02156-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07c2156

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PULSE-LINK INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff,

v.

TZERO TECHNOLOGIES,

INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 07cv2156-L(AJB)

ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

On December 3, 2007 the parties filed a Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond

to Complaint. To obtain an extension of time to respond to complaint, the moving party must

show good cause. Civ. L. Rule 12.1. The parties base their request on recent substitution of

counsel for Defendant. The court’s docket at this time does not include any application for

substitution of counsel. Accordingly, the joint motion for extension of time to respond to

complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Should the parties renew their request, they

shall include the initial due date for Defendant’s response. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 4, 2007

M. James Lorenz

United States District Court Judge

Case 3:07-cv-02156-L-AJB Document 8 Filed 12/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 07c2156

COPY TO: 

HON. ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ALL PARTIES/COUNSEL

Case 3:07-cv-02156-L-AJB Document 8 Filed 12/04/07 Page 2 of 2