Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00478/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00478-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RITA CAMACHO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 BRIDGEPORT FINANCIAL, INC. et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 04-00478 CRB

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Defendants’ Response to Camacho’s Motion for Class

Certification states that plaintiff has failed to propose a class definition. However, both

plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification and Memorandum in Support of plaintiff’s Motion

for Class Certification contains the following class definition: 

i) all persons with addresses in the State of California (ii) to whom collection

letters in the form of Exhibit A (attached to the Complaint), (iii) were sent by

Bridgeport Financial, Inc., a California Corporation, and Christina Haybridge,

Ray Lewis, individuals, in an attempt to collect debt incurred for personal,

family, or household purposes (iv) sent during the one year period prior to the

filing of the complaint in this action (v) which letters were not returned

undelivered by the United States Postal Service.

See Plaintiff’s Motion For Class Certification (Docket No. 38); Memorandum in Support of

Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification (Docket No. 39).

Defendants are ORDERED to inform the Court no later than February 22, 2006,

whether they object to plaintiff’s proposed definition. 

Case 3:04-cv-00478-CRB Document 88 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2004\0478\order re opp to class def.wpd 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2006

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-00478-CRB Document 88 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2