Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02285/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02285-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Terry Fowler,

Plaintiff, 

v.

Honeywell International, Inc.,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-2285-PHX-SMM

ORDER

NOTICE--WARNING TO PLAINTIFF

The Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 4] seeks to have your case dismissed.

A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if

granted, end your case. Because the Defendants' Motion was filed on September 28, 2006,

your response was due Tuesday, October 17, 2006.

Plaintiff is advised of the following specific provisions of LRCiv 7.2 of the Rules of

Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona:

Subparagraph (e) provides:

Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a motion including its supporting

memorandum, and the response including its supporting memorandum, each

shall not exceed seventeen (17) pages, exclusive of attachments and any

required statement of facts. Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a reply

including its supporting memorandum shall not exceed eleven (11) pages,

exclusive of attachments.

Subparagraph (i) provides:

If a motion does not conform in all substantial respects with the requirements

of this Local Rule, or if the opposing party does not serve and file the required

answering memoranda, or if counsel for any party fails to appear at the time

Case 2:06-cv-02285-SMM Document 6 Filed 11/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

and place assigned for oral argument, such non-compliance may be deemed a

consent to the denial or granting of the motion and the Court may dispose of

the motion summarily.

It is Plaintiff's obligation to timely respond to all motions. The failure of Plaintiff

to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss may, in the discretion of the Court, be

deemed a consent to the granting of that Motion without further notice, and judgment

may be entered dismissing the Complaint and action with prejudice pursuant to LRCiv

7.2(i). See Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 652-53 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until 5:00 p.m. on

Wednesday, November 29, 2006, to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file any reply by 5:00 p.m. on

December 11, 2006.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion shall be deemed ready for decision

without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise

ordered by the Court.

DATED this 8th day of November, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-02285-SMM Document 6 Filed 11/09/06 Page 2 of 2