Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02755/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02755-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFS.’ REQUEST 

TO RESP. TO 2ND DECLARATION

CASE NO. CV-13-2755 CRB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DESHON MARMAN

Plaintiffs,

v.

US AIRWAYS, an Arizona Corporation; 

DOMINIC CURRIERI, PHYLLIS GUSSDAVIS, JOHANNA ELLISON and John & 

Jane Does 3-10 (airline employees); Officer 

CALVIN TOM, #821, police officer, John 

& Jane DOES 11-30 (police officers and/or 

municipalities), and the CITY AND 

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Defendants.

Case No. CV-13-2755 CRB 

ORDER GRANTING THE AIRLINE 

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO RESPOND 

TO THE SECOND DECLARATION OF 

PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL

Hearing Date: May 15, 2015

Time: 10:00 A.M.

Courtroom: 6

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

ROBERT A. SIEGEL (S.B. #64604)

rsiegel@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

400 South Hope Street, 18th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899

Telephone: 213-430-6000

Facsimile: 213-430-6407

ADAM P. KOHSWEENEY (S.B. #229983)

akohsweeney@omm.com

SUSANNAH K. HOWARD (S.B. #291326)

showard@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-3823

Telephone: 415-984-8912

Facsimile: 415-984-8701

Attorneys for Defendants US Airways, Inc., Captain Dominic 

Currieri, Phyllis Guss-Davis, and Johanna Ellison

Case 3:13-cv-02755-CRB Document 66 Filed 05/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFS.’ REQUEST TO RESP. TO 2ND DECLARATION

CASE NO. CV-13-2755 CRB

On May 11, 2015, Defendants Dominic Currieri, Phyllis Guss-Davis, Johanna Ellison and 

US Airways, Inc. (collectively, the “Airline Defendants”), filed Objections to the Second 

Declaration of Plaintiff’s Counsel (dkt. 65), in which the Airline Defendants sought, in the 

alternative, leave to respond to the Second Declaration of Plaintiff’s Counsel and all attachments 

thereto (dkt. 64). After consideration of all the papers submitted, and all other matters presented 

to the Court in this action, the Court orders as follows:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Airline Defendants shall be permitted to respond to 

the Second Declaration of Plaintiff’s Counsel and all attachments thereto (dkt. 64). The Airline 

Defendants’ Response to the Second Declaration of Plaintiff’s Counsel, attached to the Motion as 

“Exhibit A,” is deemed filed. 

Dated: May 13, 2015 ___________________________________

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

United States District Court Judge

Northern District of California

Case 3:13-cv-02755-CRB Document 66 Filed 05/14/15 Page 2 of 2