Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01424/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01424-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CEDRIC GREENE,

Plaintiff, CV F 06 1424 AWI WMW P 

vs. ORDER RE: FINDINGS & 

 RECOMMENDATIONS (#10)

V. MCLAUGHLIN, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302. 

 On January 24, 2007, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending

that Plaintiff be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was provided an

opportunity to file objections within thirty days. On February 6, 2007, Plaintiff filed objections

to the findings and recommendations.

The Court recommended that Plaintiff be denied leave to proceed in forma

pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g) on the ground that Plaintiff failed to allege facts

indicating that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. In his objections, Plaintiff

Case 1:06-cv-01424-AWI-WMW Document 11 Filed 03/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

argues that the fact of confinement in state prison constituted imminent danger. Plaintiff also

argues that his wrongful placement in disciplinary confinement and the denial of credit earnings

constitutes imminent danger. Plaintiff has not alleged facts indicating that he is in imminent

danger of serious physical injury. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

proper analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on

January 24, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. Plaintiff is directed to submit, within thirty days of the date of service of this

order, the $350 filing fee for this action in full. Plaintiff’s failure to do so will result in dismissal

of this action pursuant to Local Rule 11-110 for failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01424-AWI-WMW Document 11 Filed 03/14/07 Page 2 of 2