Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05153/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05153-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

la-860674 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

D. GREG DURBIN (CA Bar NO. 81749) 

Greg.Durbin@Mccormickbarstow.Com

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD 

 WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 

P.O. Box 28912 

5 River Park Place East 

Fresno, California 93729-8912 

Telephone: (559) 433-1300 

KATHYLEEN A. O’BRIEN, (CA BAR NO. 94218) 

Kobrien@Mofo.Com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3500 

Los Angeles, California 90013-1024 

Telephone: (213) 892-5200 

Facsimile: (213) 892-5454 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

E.& J. GALLO WINERY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

E.& J. GALLO WINERY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CANTINE RALLO, S.p.A., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 1: 04 CV 5153 OWW DLB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RENOTICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL AND REGARDING OTHER 

DISCOVERY ISSUES 

Hearing 

Date: June 2, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 9 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the parties 

hereto, subject to approval by the Court, that the hearing on E. & J. Gallo Winery's (“Gallo”) motion 

to compel the production of documents and further written responses be continued for one week 

(from June 2, to June 9, 2006) to give the parties the opportunity to resolve any issues which remain 

in contention (including after Gallo reviews documents that have been produced as well as additional 

documents the production of which is anticipated from Cantine Rallo S.p.A. (“Cantine Rallo”)); 

Case 1:04-cv-05153-LJO -DLB Document 74 Filed 05/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

la-860674 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Further, the parties agree not to serve any additional discovery requests during the one week 

from the date hereof until June 2, 2006; 

Further, the parties agree that neither party will file any motions to compel responses to 

discovery during the one week from the date hereof until June 2, 2006; and 

Further, Cantine Rallo agrees that Gallo has a one-week extension (from May 30 to June 6) to 

respond to Cantine Rallo's second set of requests for production. 

Dated: May 26, 2006 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

KATHYLEEN A. O’BRIEN 

and 

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD 

WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 

D. GREG DURBIN 

By: /s/ Kathyleen A. O’Brien 

 Kathyleen A. O’Brien 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 E.& J. GALLO WINERY 

Dated: May 26, 2006 WHITE & CASE LLP 

JONATHAN E. MOSKIN 

By: _/s/ Jonathan E. Moskin______

 Jonathan E. Moskin 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 CANTINE RALLO, S.p.A. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 30, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

Honorable Dennis L. Beck 

Case 1:04-cv-05153-LJO -DLB Document 74 Filed 05/30/06 Page 2 of 2