Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01380/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01380-52/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE H. ROBINSON,

Plaintiff,

 v.

D. G. ADAMS, et al.,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:08cv1380-AWI-BAM (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(ECF No. 183)

Plaintiff George H. Robinson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s complaint 

against Defendants David, Miranda, Melo, Garcia, Mendoza and Masiel for use of excessive 

force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; against Defendants Adams and Ruiz for failure to 

protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and against Defendants Martinez, David, Miranda 

and Garcia for assault and battery in violation of state law.

On August 12, 2013, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address, which indicated that he 

had been transferred to Corcoran State Prison. On September 6, 2013, Plaintiff filed the instant 

request for a status conference. Plaintiff explains that his property was either left at Centinela 

State Prison or sent to Corcoran State Prison. Plaintiff claims that he has attempted to ask about 

his property and has filed requests, letters and appeals with no response. Plaintiff also claims 

that he has been harassed and retaliated against for inquiring about his property. Plaintiff 

Case 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-BAM Document 186 Filed 09/13/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

believes that a status conference will help resolve the ongoing issue with his property and may 

encourage prison staff to issue his documents. (ECF No. 183.)

Plaintiff’s request for a status conference shall be denied at this time. Currently, there are 

no pending deadlines in this action requiring reference to Plaintiff’s legal documents. 

Accordingly, there appears to be sufficient time for Plaintiff’s appeals or other requests to be 

considered and resolved without the necessity of court intervention. However, Plaintiff is not 

precluded from renewing his request for a status conference or from seeking other appropriate 

relief from this Court in the event that he is unable to obtain his legal documents in sufficient 

time to respond to relevant filing deadlines or otherwise prosecute this action. 

For these reasons, Plaintiff’s request for status conference is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 13, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-BAM Document 186 Filed 09/13/13 Page 2 of 2