Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00388/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00388-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Setting New Briefing Schedule

G:\PRO-SE\SJ.JW\CR.06\Perez388_sched-order.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE LUIS PEREZ,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY, et al.,

Defendant(s).

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-00388 JW (PR)

ORDER SETTING NEW BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

Plaintiff filed the instant pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Because plaintiff had not communicated with the Court for over nine months, the

Court ordered plaintiff to file a notice of intent to prosecute within thirty days of

February 29, 2008, in order to proceed with the action. On March 26, 2008, plaintiff

filed a notice of intent to prosecute with a notice of change of address. 

Accordingly, the Court sets forth the following briefing schedule: 

 1. Defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment or other

dispositive motion with respect to the claims in the amended complaint found to be

cognizable in the Court’s Order of Service filed January 9, 2008, no later than sixty

(60) days from the date of this order. 

2. Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the

Case 5:06-cv-00388-JW Document 22 Filed 04/04/08 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Setting New Briefing Schedule

G:\PRO-SE\SJ.JW\CR.06\Perez388_sched-order.wpd 2

Court and served on defendants no later than thirty (30) days from the date

defendants’ motion is filed. 

3. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fifteen (15) days after 

plaintiff’s opposition is filed. 

All other provisions of the Court’s Order of Service filed January 9,

2008, shall remain in effect. 

Extensions of time are not favored, though reasonable extensions will be

granted. However, the party making the motion for an extension of time is not

relieved from his or her duty to comply with the deadlines set by the Court merely

by having made a motion for an extension of time. The party making the motion

must still meet the deadlines set by the Court until an order addressing the motion

for an extension of time is received. Any motion for an extension of time must be

filed no later than the deadline sought to be extended. 

DATED: 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge 

April 3, 2008 

Case 5:06-cv-00388-JW Document 22 Filed 04/04/08 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE LUIS PEREZ,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants. /

Case Number: CV06-00388 JW 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District

Court, Northern District of California.

That on , I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached,

by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed,

by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office

delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Jose Luis Perez no. 96523-011

Federal Correctional Complex I

PO Box 5300

Adelanto, CA 92301

Dated: 

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk

4/4/2008 4/4/2008 /s/

Case 5:06-cv-00388-JW Document 22 Filed 04/04/08 Page 3 of 3