Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01492/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01492-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UBALDO MIO GUTIERREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

P. REYERSBACH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP (PC)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

On May 28, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to compel. ECF No. 29. To date, defendant has 

not filed a response to plaintiff’s motion. Accordingly, defendant will be ordered to show cause 

why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to file a response to plaintiff’s motion. See

E.D. Cal. L.R. 110 (“Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order 

of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by 

statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”). 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant shall file a response to plaintiff’s motion and show cause why sanctions 

should not be imposed for his failure to file a response to plaintiff’s motion within fourteen days 

of this order. 

2. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a 

recommendation that defendant’s default be entered. 

Case 2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP Document 33 Filed 07/10/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 10, 2024 

JEREMY D. PETERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP Document 33 Filed 07/10/24 Page 2 of 2