Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06436/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06436-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF DISCOVERY CONFERENCE—CASE NO. 

02-1486 PJH (JCS); 06-04333 PJH (JCS) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

EDMUND G. BROWN JR. 

Attorney General of the State of California 

THOMAS GREENE 

Chief Assistant Attorney General 

KATHLEEN E. FOOTE (S.B. 65819) 

Senior Assistant Attorney General 

EMILIO E. VARANINI (S.B. 163952) 

Emilio.varanini@doj.ca.gov 

Deputy Attorney General 

455 Golden Gate Avenue 

San Francisco, California 94102 

Telephone: (415) 703-5908 

Facsimile: (415) 703-5480 

 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff States 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

KENNETH R. O’ROURKE (S.B. # 120144) 

korourke@omn.com 

STEVEN H. BERGMAN (S.B. # 180542) 

sbergman@omm.com 

JANE Y. CHANG (S.B. # 241890) 

jchang@omm.com 

400 South Hope Street 

Los Angeles, California 90071-2899 

Telephone: (213) 430-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTORS INC. and 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTORS AMERICA INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, et al., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 06-4333 PJH 

Master File No. M-02-1486 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE 

OF FEBRUARY 28, 2008 DISCOVERY 

CONFERENCE 

 

Case 4:06-cv-06436-PJH Document 123 Filed 02/26/08 Page 1 of 7
 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF DISCOVERY CONFERENCE—CASE NO. 

02-1486 PJH (JCS); 06-04333 PJH (JCS) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, following the discovery conference held on December 7, 2007, the Court 

ordered the parties to file a joint status statement by February 21, 2008 and the parties filed 

their joint status statement on February 21, 2008; 

 WHEREAS the Court set a further discovery conference for Thursday, February 28, 

2008 and ordered the parties to submit a stipulation if the hearing date needed to be moved; 

WHEREAS the parties are meeting-and-conferring presently about various discovery 

issues. The parties are not currently seeking the Court’s resolution of any disputes and 

believe that the February 28, 2008 discovery conference can be continued. 

Plaintiff States and Defendants have stipulated and agreed as follows: 

1. The parties stipulate to continuing the February 28, 2008 discovery conference 

for 30 days, or a date more convenient for the Court. 

DATED: February 25, 2008 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. 

Attorney General of the State of California 

THOMAS GREENE 

KATHLEEN E. FOOTE 

EMILIO E. VARANINI 

By: /s/Emilio E. Varanini .

 Emilio E. Varanini 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiff States 

Case 4:06-cv-06436-PJH Document 123 Filed 02/26/08 Page 2 of 7
 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF DISCOVERY CONFERENCE—CASE NO. 

02-1486 PJH (JCS); 06-04333 PJH (JCS) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

KENNETH R. O’ROURKE 

STEVEN H. BERGMAN 

JANE Y. CHANG 

____s/ Steven H. Bergman______________ 

 Steven H. Bergman 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTORS INC. and 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTORS AMERICA INC., 

and signing on behalf of Defendants MICRON 

TECHNOLOGY, INC., MICRON 

SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC., 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH 

AMERICA CORP., INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES 

AG, ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC., ELPIDA 

MEMORY, INC., MOSEL VITELIC INC., 

MOSEL VITELIC CORPORATION, NANYA 

TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA 

TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION USA and NEC 

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC 

ATTESTATION OF FILING

 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § X(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in 

the filing of this stipulation from all of the Defendants listed in the signature block above. 

 

__ s/ Steven H. Bergman ____

 Steven H. Bergman

Attorneys for Defendants Hynix Semiconductor Inc. 

and Hynix Semiconductor America Inc. 

ORDER 

 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February ____, 2008. 

 ______________________________ 

 JOSEPH C. SPERO 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

The discovery conference is re-set for March 28, 2008 at 1:30 PM. An updated joint cmc statement shall 

be due by March 21, 2008. Counsel for the State of CA shall provide the Court with the call-in number. 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 4:06-cv-06436-PJH Document 123 Filed 02/26/08 Page 3 of 7
Case 4:06-cv-06436-PJH Document 123 Filed 02/26/08 Page 4 of 7
Case 4:06-cv-06436-PJH Document 123 Filed 02/26/08 Page 5 of 7
Case 4:06-cv-06436-PJH Document 123 Filed 02/26/08 Page 6 of 7
Case 4:06-cv-06436-PJH Document 123 Filed 02/26/08 Page 7 of 7