Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02928/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02928-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AYERS LOVETTE,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-2928 GGH P

vs.

PEOPLE OF SAC. COUNTY,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed November 4, 2009, petitioner was ordered to file an application

to proceed in forma pauperis within twenty-eight days. The twenty-eight day period has now

expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an application to

proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this case.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 14, 2010 

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

love2928.fff

Case 2:09-cv-02928-JAM-GGH Document 5 Filed 01/14/10 Page 1 of 1