Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_03-cv-02112/USCOURTS-casd-3_03-cv-02112-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 03cv2112

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

C.B. & D.M. ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; and

4805 CONVOY, INC.,

Civil No. 03cv2112-BTM (CAB)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

AMEND THE COMPLAINT

[Doc. No. 36]

v.

MICHAEL GALARDI; MDG, INC., a Nevada

corporation, dba CHEETAH CLUB; and DOES

1-100, inclusive,

Defendants.

On June 27, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the complaint. [Doc. No. 36.] On July 2,

2007, Judge Moskowitz referred the matter to the undersigned. [Doc. No. 38.] This Court reset the

motion hearing date for August 2, 2007. Defendants’ opposition to the motion was due on July 19,

2007, but an opposition was never filed. On July 30, 2007, during a telephonic conference with the

Court, John Barriage, defense counsel, represented to the Court that he did not oppose the motion to

amend.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure directs that leave to amend “shall be freely given when justice so

requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Based on the non-opposition of defense counsel and the moving papers

///

///

///

///

Case 3:03-cv-02112-JLS-CAB Document 45 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 03cv2112

filed by Plaintiffs, the motion to amend the complaint is hereby GRANTED. Attachment #2 to Doc. No.

36 shall be filed on the docket and shall be entitled “Second Amended Complaint.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 31, 2007

CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:03-cv-02112-JLS-CAB Document 45 Filed 08/01/07 Page 2 of 2