Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00800/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00800-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAUL MONTANO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0800 KJN P

vs.

SOLOMON, et al., AMENDED DISCOVERY AND

Defendants. SCHEDULING ORDER

 /

On February 9, 2010, this case was reassigned to the undersigned for all purposes. 

Docket No. 34. Presently pending are the requests of both parties that the time for discovery be

extended, see Docket Nos. 28, 32, 33, which the court will grant for good cause shown. This

change also requires an extension of time for filing dispositive motions. 

The only defendant remaining in this action is Dr. Richard Tan, M.D, Docket No.

25, who has answered the Second Amended Complaint, Docket No. 26. 

The deadline for discovery in this action was February 5, 2010. See Docket No.

27, at 4. Both parties sought an extension of this deadline prior to its expiration. Plaintiff seeks

an extension of the deadline because: he was transferred from California State Prison-Solano to

San Quentin on November 18, 2009, and has had limited access to his legal work; he cannot

speak English so must rely on the assistance of bilingual inmates; and plaintiff has not received

Case 2:07-cv-00800-KJN Document 35 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Defendant states that this case was first served on the California Attorney General, who 1

referred the matter in early October 2009 to the California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation to obtain outside contract counsel. Current counsel states that an answer was

promptly filed October 5, 2009, to preserve defendant’s rights. Although counsel improperly

names more than one defendant (Docket No. 33, at 1:26-27), and relies on an e-mail that does not

appear related to the instant case (Docket No. 33-2, at 2, 4), his request for additional time to

conduct discovery is well taken.

2

responses to the discovery he has already propounded. Defendant seeks an extension of the

deadline due to the late assignment of current outside counsel to this case, and the need for 1

additional time to conduct meaningful discovery. 

Good cause appearing, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 

6(b)(1)(A) (request made prior to expiration of deadline), the parties’ requests will be granted,

and the discovery deadline extended to June 11, 2010. The court will also extend the deadline

for filing dispositive motions to September 10, 2010.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall proceed in

accordance with paragraphs 1-5 of this order. In addition, the court will set an amended initial

schedule for this litigation.

Should this matter proceed to trial, the court will, by subsequent order, require the

parties to file pretrial statements. In addition to the matters required to be addressed in the

pretrial statement in accordance with Rule 281, Local Rules of the United States District Court,

Eastern District of California (“Local Rules”), plaintiff will be required to make a particularized

showing in the pretrial statement in order to obtain the attendance of witnesses at trial. Plaintiff

is advised that failure to comply with the procedures set forth below may result in the preclusion

of any and all witnesses named in the pretrial statement. 

At the trial of this case, the plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to

prove each of the alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are

two kinds of trial evidence: (1) exhibits; and (2) the testimony of witnesses. It is the plaintiff’s

responsibility to produce all of the evidence to prove the claims, whether that evidence is in the

Case 2:07-cv-00800-KJN Document 35 Filed 02/16/10 Page 2 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

form of exhibits or witness testimony. If the plaintiff wants to call witnesses to testify, he must

follow certain procedures to ensure that the witnesses will be at the trial and available to testify.

I. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who

Agree to Testify Voluntarily

An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give testimony

cannot come to court unless this court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the witness

to be transported to court. This court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied that:

1. The prospective witness is willing to attend; 

and

2. The prospective witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts.

With the pretrial statement, a party intending to introduce the testimony of

incarcerated witnesses who have agreed voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file a

written motion for a court order requiring that such witnesses be brought to court at the time of

trial. The motion must:

1. State the name, CDC Identification number, and address of each such

witness;

and

2. Be accompanied by affidavits showing that each witness is willing to

testify and that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts.

The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways:

1. The party can swear by affidavit that the prospective witness has

informed the party that he is willing to testify voluntarily without being

subpoenaed. The party must state in the affidavit when and where the

prospective witness informed the party of this willingness;

or

Case 2:07-cv-00800-KJN Document 35 Filed 02/16/10 Page 3 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

4

2. The party can serve and file an affidavit sworn to by the prospective

witness, in which the witness states that he is willing to testify without

being subpoenaed.

The prospective witness' actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one

of two ways:

1. The party can swear by affidavit that the prospective witness has actual

knowledge. However, this can be done only if the party has actual

firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness was an eyewitness or an

ear-witness to the relevant facts. For example, if an incident occurred in

the plaintiff's cell and, at the time, the plaintiff saw that a cellmate was

present and observed the incident, the plaintiff may swear to the cellmate's

ability to testify.

Or

2. The party can serve and file an affidavit sworn to by the prospective

witness in which the witness describes the relevant facts to which the

prospective witness was an eye- or ear-witness. Whether the affidavit is

made by the plaintiff or by the prospective witness, it must be specific

about what the incident was, when and where it occurred, who was

present, and how the prospective witness happened to be in a position to

see or to hear what occurred at the time it occurred.

The court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated

witnesses, specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the

court will issue the order necessary to cause the witness' custodian to bring the witness to court.

/ / / /

/ / / /

Case 2:07-cv-00800-KJN Document 35 Filed 02/16/10 Page 4 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

5

II. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who

Refuse to Testify Voluntarily

If a party seeks to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who refuse to

testify voluntarily, the party should submit with the pretrial statement a motion for the attendance

of such witnesses. Such motion should be in the form described above. In addition, the party

must indicate in the motion that the incarcerated witnesses are not willing to testify voluntarily.

III. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who

Agree to Testify Voluntarily

It is the responsibility of the party who has secured an unincarcerated witness'

voluntary attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial. No action need be sought

or obtained from the court.

IV. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who

Refuse to Testify Voluntarily

If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify

voluntarily, not earlier than four weeks and not later than two weeks before trial, the party must

prepare and submit to the United States Marshal a subpoena for service by the Marshal upon the

witness. (Blank subpoena forms may be obtained from the Clerk of the Court.) Also, the party

seeking the witness' presence must tender an appropriate sum of money to the witness through

the United States Marshal. In the case of an unincarcerated witness, the appropriate sum of

money is the daily witness fee of $40.00 plus the witness' travel expenses.

A subpoena will not be served by the United States Marshal upon an

unincarcerated witness unless the subpoena is accompanied by a money order made payable to

the witness for the full amount of the witness' travel expenses plus the daily witness fee of

$40.00, and a copy of the court's order granting plaintiff in forma pauperis status. Because no

Case 2:07-cv-00800-KJN Document 35 Filed 02/16/10 Page 5 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 If an attorney has filed a document with the court on behalf of any defendant, then 2

plaintiff must serve documents on that attorney and not on the defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

5(b).

6

statute authorizes the use of public funds for these expenses in civil cases, the tendering of

witness fees and travel expenses is required even if the party was granted leave to proceed in

forma pauperis.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motions (Docket Nos. 28 and 32), and defendant’s motion (Docket

No. 33), are GRANTED. 

2. The parties may conduct discovery until June 11, 2010. Any motions

necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by that date. All requests for discovery pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 31, 33, 34 or 36, shall be served not later than sixty (60) days prior to that date.

3. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or

before September 10, 2010. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of this

court’s order filed June 29, 2009 (Docket No. 23). 

4. Discovery requests shall be served by the party seeking the discovery on all

parties to the action. Discovery requests shall not be filed with the court except when required

2

by Local Rules 250.1, 250.2, 250.3 and 250.4.

5. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five days after the

request is served.

6. The parties are cautioned that filing of discovery requests or responses, except

as required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a

recommendation that the action be dismissed or the answer stricken.

7. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a), defendant may depose plaintiff and any other

witness confined in a prison upon condition that, at least fourteen days before such a deposition,

defendant serve all parties with the notice required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(1).

Case 2:07-cv-00800-KJN Document 35 Filed 02/16/10 Page 6 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

7

8. If disputes arise about the parties’ obligations to respond to requests for

discovery, the parties shall comply with all pertinent rules including Fed. R. Civ. P. 5, 7, 11, 26,

and 37, and Local Rules 134, 135, 130, 131, 110, 142, and 230(l); but unless otherwise ordered,

Local Rule 251 shall not apply. Filing of a discovery motion that does not comply with all

applicable rules may result in imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to denial of the

motion.

9. Pretrial conference and trial dates will be set, as appropriate, following

adjudication of any dispositive motion, or the expiration of time for filing such a motion.

10. The Clerk of Court shall redesignate plaintiff’s address as San Quentin State

Prison, San Quentin, California 94974.

DATED: February 16, 2010

 /s/ Kendall J. Newman 

 KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

41dso.kjn.wpd

Case 2:07-cv-00800-KJN Document 35 Filed 02/16/10 Page 7 of 7