Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00114/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00114-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENITO AGUILAR,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

KIM HOLLAND, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:16-cv-00114-LJO-GSA-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF No. 13.)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH 

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A 

CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY 

BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT 

TO 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g)

ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

I. BACKGROUND

Benito Aguilar (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 

in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2016, Plaintiff 

filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On December 29, 2016, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending 

that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff=s failure to state a claim upon which relief may 

be granted under §1983. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file 

objections to the findings and recommendations. (Id.) The thirty day time period has passed, 

Case 1:16-cv-00114-LJO-GSA Document 14 Filed 02/16/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and Plaintiff has not filed objections or any other response to the findings and 

recommendations. (Court Record.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 

analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

December 29, 2016, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on plaintiff=s failure to state a 

claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983;

3. This dismissal is subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. '

1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011); and

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16, 2017 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00114-LJO-GSA Document 14 Filed 02/16/17 Page 2 of 2