Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-04286/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-04286-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINE 

Pervoe, et al. v. Swetavage, et al.; USDC Case No. 4:12-cv-04286 JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John L. Burris, State Bar No. 069888 

Benjamin Nisenbaum, State Bar No. 222173 

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 

Oakland, CA 94621 

Telephone: (510) 839-5200 

Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 

Email: bnisenbaum@hotmail.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Thomas F. Bertrand, State Bar No. 056560 

Richard W. Osman, State Bar No. 167993 

Michael C. Wenzel, State Bar No. 215388 

BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

Email: mwenzel@bfesf.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOE PERVOE, individually and as successor in 

interest to John Wayne McGee, and CAROLYN 

COPELAND, individually, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

RYAN SWETAVAGE, an individual; MIGUEL

IBARRA, an individual; LONALA 

KAHO’ALI’I, an individual; ANDREA 

NEDEROSTEK, an individual; TRAVIS 

HIGGINS, an individual; DEREK MEZA, an 

individual; CHRISTOPHER HAENDEL, an 

individual; ALBERTO-ANDRES HOLMES, an 

individual; JOHN TOWNSLEY, an individual; 

THOMAS NELSON, an individual; and DOES 

1-50, inclusive, in their capacities as Sheriff’s 

Deputies for the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, 

 

 Defendants. 

 CASE NO.: 4:12-cv-04286 JST 

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO 

COMPEL DEADLINE; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Case 3:12-cv-04286-JST Document 79 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 3
 2 

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINE 

Pervoe, et al. v. Swetavage, et al.; USDC Case No. 4:12-cv-04286 JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

 WHEREAS, the parties have proceeded with conducting discovery in the instant action; 

 WHEREAS, the parties previously submitted to the Court a Stipulation Regarding ADR, 

Expert Witness Designations, and Fact Discovery on February 2, 2015, to extend the completion of 

fact discovery; 

 WHEREAS, the Court ordered the close of fact discovery extended to March 5, 2015, such 

that Plaintiffs’ should respond to Defendants’ contention interrogatories by the close of fact 

discovery; 

 WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs’ discovery responses 

and Plaintiffs’ agreed to supplement their responses, including contention interrogatories 

responses; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ failed to provide supplemental responses to Defendants’ contention 

interrogatories and other fact discovery by March 5, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 37-3 Defendants’ deadline to file a motion to compel 

further responses to their discovery requests is March 12, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel has assured Defendants’ counsel that Plaintiffs’ 

supplemental discovery responses will be served on March 11, 2015; 

 WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court’s scheduling order in this 

action be modified to allow the Plaintiffs’ time to serve supplemental discovery responses and so 

that Defendants may have sufficient time to review the responses prior to expiration of the motion 

to compel deadline, by: 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:12-cv-04286-JST Document 79 Filed 03/11/15 Page 2 of 3
 3 

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINE 

Pervoe, et al. v. Swetavage, et al.; USDC Case No. 4:12-cv-04286 JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Extending the motion to compel deadline to April 2, 2015, such that Plaintiffs can 

meaningfully respond to Defendants’ contention interrogatories and other fact discovery by March 

13, 2015. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: March 11, 2015 THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 

 /s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum

 Benjamin Nisenbaum 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: March 11, 2015 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL 

 /s/ Michael Wenzel 

 Michael Wenzel 

 Attorney for Defendants 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Court hereby orders as follows: 

1. The motion to compel deadline is hereby extended to April 2, 2015, such that 

Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendants’ contention interrogatories and other discovery by March 13, 

2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:______________ ________________________________ 

 Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

March 11, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:12-cv-04286-JST Document 79 Filed 03/11/15 Page 3 of 3