Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02304/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02304-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF #1489216 v1/820332-68 -1- 06cv2304 IEG (WMc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DENNIS GORDON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.; JOHN 

GREENE, and individual; MATTHEW 

VOELKER, an individual and DOES 1 

through 25 inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 06cv2304 IEG (WMc) 

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 

DISMISSAL OF ALL EMOTIONAL 

DISTRESS DAMAGES 

Plaintiff, DENNIS GORDON, and Defendants, PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC. 

(“PRUDENTIAL”), MATTHEW VOELKER (“VOELKER”), and JOHN GREENE 

(“GREENE”), through their counsel of record, stipulated to the entry of the following Order 

regarding Plaintiff’s Dismissal of all emotional distress damages in this action. 

WHEREAS, at Plaintiff’s deposition on April 18, 2008, Plaintiff and his counsel 

voluntarily agreed on the record to waive all emotional distress damages in this action, including 

both independent claims therefor and as an element of damages in other claims, the Parties request 

Case 3:06-cv-02304-IEG-WMC Document 62 Filed 06/02/08 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S DISMISSAL OF ALL EMOTIONAL DISTRESS DAMAGES 

SF #1489216 v1/820332-68 -2- 06cv2304 IEG (WMc)

the Court order the following: 

1. Dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff’s Sixth Claim for Relief for Intentional 

Infliction of Emotional Distress against all Defendants. 

2. Dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff’s Seventh Claim for Relief for Negligent 

Infliction of Emotional Distress against all Defendants. 

3. Paragraph 46 of Plaintiff’s First Claim for Relief be stricken from the Complaint. 

4. Paragraph 54 of Plaintiff’s Second Claim for Relief be stricken from the 

Complaint. 

5. Paragraph 64 of Plaintiff’s Third Claim for Relief be stricken from the Complaint. 

6. Paragraph 82 of Plaintiff’s Fifth Claim for Relief be stricken be stricken from the 

Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 2, 2008 

______________________________________ 

IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge 

United States District Court 

Case 3:06-cv-02304-IEG-WMC Document 62 Filed 06/02/08 Page 2 of 2