Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03709/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03709-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER STAYING ACTION

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

 Paul H. Dawes (Bar No. 55191) 

 John C. Tang (Bar No. 212371) 

 Michele D. Johnson (Bar No. 198298) 

 Peter T. Snow (Bar No. 222117) 

140 Scott Drive 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 328-4600 

Facsimile: (650) 463-2600

Counsel For CV Therapeutics, Inc. and 

the Individual Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re CV THERAPEUTICS, INC. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: All Actions 

Master File No. C-03-3709-SI (EMC) 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

STAYING ACTION 

WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the 

settlement of this action; 

WHEREAS, the parties intend to file within the next thirty days to request preliminary 

approval of the settlement; and 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to jointly seek a stay of all proceedings in order to 

conserve resources and permit the parties to focus on the settlement. 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, and respectfully request the Court to 

order, that all proceedings are hereby stayed for thirty days following entry of the [proposed] 

Order, and that all deadlines are hereby taken off calendar, subject to being reset if necessary. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Case 3:03-cv-03709-SI Document 433 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-03709-SI Document 435 Filed 11/06/06 Page 1 of 2
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER STAYING ACTION

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: November 3, 2006 LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

 /S/ 

Reed R. Kathrein 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

100 Pine Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

T: 415/288-4545 

F: 415/288-4534 

Dated: November 3, 2006 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

 /S/ 

John C. Tang 

Counsel for Defendants 

140 Scott Drive 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

T: 650/328-4600 

F: 650/463-2600 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest 

under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from 

Reed R. Kathrein. 

* * * 

ORDER 

 Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ 

The Honorable Susan Illston 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-03709-SI Document 433 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-03709-SI Document 435 Filed 11/06/06 Page 2 of 2