Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_97-cv-02965/USCOURTS-cand-3_97-cv-02965-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO., ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C-97-2965 MMC (JCS)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On December 1, 2005, Plaintiff, City and County of San Francisco (“San Francisco”), and

Defendant Airport Group International (“AGI”) entered into a stipulation (the “Stipulation”). The

Stipulation confirmed that a final settlement agreement had been negotiated between San Francisco and

AGI, and that the settlement agreement had been approved by AGI. In connection with the settlement, the

case was also to be dismissed against Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed”). 

Nonetheless, the settlement agreement had been executed only by outside counsel for AGI (with full

authority). Accordingly, the parties agreed that unless a settlement agreement executed by an authorized

employee of AGI were delivered to San Francisco on or before December 9, 2005, the matter would be

referred to the undersigned. AGI did not deliver a signed settlement agreement by December 9, 2005. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that AGI and Lockheed show cause why

AGI has not delivered a copy of the settlement agreement signed by an authorized employee of AGI. AGI

and Lockheed shall respond to this Order to Show Cause in writing on or before December 30, 2005. In

addition, San Francisco, AGI and Lockheed are ORDERED to appear in person on January 6, 2006, at

9:30 a.m., through both lead outside trial counsel and an employee of AGI and an employee of Lockheed,

Case 3:97-cv-02965-MMC Document 656 Filed 12/12/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

each with full authority to settle this case. The employee of AGI must have full authority to execute a

settlement agreement in this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2005

 

 JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:97-cv-02965-MMC Document 656 Filed 12/12/05 Page 2 of 2