Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_11-cv-01305/USCOURTS-casd-3_11-cv-01305-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michael K. Friedland (State Bar No. 157,217) 

mfriedland@kmob.com

Paul N. Conover (State Bar No. 192,358) 

pconover@kmob.com

Ali S. Razai (State Bar No. 246,922) 

ali.razai@kmob.com

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 

2040 Main Street 

Fourteenth Floor 

Irvine, CA 92614 

Phone: (949) 760-0404 

Facsimile: (949) 760-9502 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

OAKLEY, INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLEY, INC., a Washington corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

TALITOR FAR EAST COMPANY LIMITED, a 

Taiwan company, MUNGOSHOP.COM, a South 

Carolina company, SURPRISINGGIFT.COM, a 

South Carolina company, NUTECH TRADING 

USA INC., a New York corporation, IOFFER 

CORPORATION, a California corporation, 

TRIPLECLICKS, a Nebraska company, 

CARSON SERVICES INC., a Nebraska 

corporation, BRILLIANT STORE, INC., a 

California corporation, THE CAMERA BOX 

INC., a New York Corporation, LOCAL DEAL 

FINDER, a Massachusetts company, BARGAINS 

FOR YOU LLC, a Massachusetts company, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 11cv1305 DMS (WMC) 

ORDER GRANTING CONSENT 

JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT 

INJUNCTION AGAINST

DEFENDANTS 

MUNGOSHOP.COM AND 

SURPRISINGGIFT.COM ONLY

Case 3:11-cv-01305-DMS-WMC Document 16 Filed 09/22/11 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

The Court, having considered Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. (“Oakley”) and Defendants 

Mungoshop.com (“Mungo”) and Surprisinggift.com (“SurprisingGift”) (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as “Defendants”) Joint Motion for Consent Judgment and Permanent 

Injunction, and good cause appearing, hereby GRANTS Oakley and Defendants Mungo and 

SurprisingGift’s Joint Motion for Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction based on the 

Confidential Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) executed by and between the 

Oakley and Defendants Mungo and SurprisingGift on September 20, 2011 (“Effective Date”), 

which disposed of all claims in this Action. 

6

7

8

9

10

12

13

14

15

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this Action as well as personal 

11 jurisdiction over Oakley and Defendants Mungo and SurprisingGift. 

2. Venue is proper in this judicial district. 

3. Oakley is the owner of U.S. Design Patent No. D523,461 (“the D461 patent”). 

4. Oakley is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,387,949 (“the ‘949 patent”). 

5. The claims of the D461 patent and the ‘949 patent are valid and enforceable. 

6 6. Defendants Mungo and SurprisingGift have sold and offered for sale the 

SCR88 Spy Sunglasses Camcorder Mobile Eyewear Recorder (“Accused Eyewear”), 

depicted in the photograph attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

17

18

19

21

7. Defendants Mungo and SurprisingGift infringe the D461 patent and the ‘949 

20 patent by their sale and offer for sale of the Accused Eyewear. 

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

8. Pursuant to the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 283, Defendants Mungo and 

SurprisingGift, together with their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and 

affiliates thereof, representatives and attorneys, and all persons acting or attempting to act in 

concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined and restrained from making, 

using, offering to sell, selling, or distributing within the United States, its territories and 

possessions, or by importing into the United States, its territories and possessions, the 

Accused Eyewear or any other goods that are no more than a colorable variation therefrom 

and that are infringements of the D461 during the life of said patent. 

 -3- Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction 

Case no. 11cv1305 DMS (WMC)

Case 3:11-cv-01305-DMS-WMC Document 16 Filed 09/22/11 Page 2 of 4
 -3- Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction 

Case no. 11cv1305 DMS (WMC)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

11

13

1

10

12

14

15

6

17

18

20

21

22

23

24

25

2

19

6

27

28

9. Pursuant to the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 283, Defendants Mungo and 

SurprisingGift, together with their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and 

affiliates thereof, representatives and attorneys, and all persons acting or attempting to act in 

concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined and restrained from making, 

using, offering to sell, selling, or distributing within the United States, its territories and 

possessions, or by importing into the United States, its territories and possessions, the 

Accused Eyewear or any other goods that are no more than a colorable variation therefrom 

and that are infringements of the ‘949 patent during the life of said patent. 

10. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Oakley against only Defendants 

Mungo and SurprisingGift on all causes of action. 

11. No other or further relief is granted to either Oakley or Defendants Mungo and 

SurprisingGift with respect to each other. 

12. Oakley and Defendants Mungo and SurprisingGift advise that they 

affirmatively waive any and all rights to appeal this Final Consent Judgment and Permanent 

Injunction.

13. This Court retains jurisdiction to monitor and enforce compliance with this 

Permanent Injunction. 

14. This Final Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction do not resolve the 

claims brought by Oakley against other Defendants in this action. 

Dated: September 22, 2011 

Honorable Dana M. Sabraw 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

bl D M S b

Case 3:11-cv-01305-DMS-WMC Document 16 Filed 09/22/11 Page 3 of 4
EXHIBIT A

Case 3:11-cv-01305-DMS-WMC Document 16 Filed 09/22/11 Page 4 of 4