Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00108/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00108-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:0271 Patent Infringement

---

1

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE:

QUALCOMM LITIGATION

Case No.: 3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

ORDER GRANTING IN PART 

AND DENYING IN PART 

MOTIONS TO SEAL

[ECF Nos. 1101, 1113, 1073, 1076, 

1116, 1090, 1110, 1087, 1085, 1099, 

1095, 1102, 1118, 1091, 1083, 1105, 

1093.]

Before the Court are numerous non-party requests to seal certain exhibits whose 

documents are among the “will call” exhibits and deposition designations that the parties 

may offer into evidence in Case No. 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD. (ECF Nos. 1101, 1113, 

1073, 1076, 1116, 1090, 1110, 1087, 1085, 1099, 1095, 1102, 1118, 1091, 1083, 1105, 

1093.) Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) has filed a consolidated response to the 

motions to seal. ECF No. 1138. Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Compal Electronics, Inc., Hon 

Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., FIH Mobile Ltd., Pegatron Corporation, and Wistron 

Corporation (collectively, the “Contract Manufacturers” or “CMs”) have submitted that 

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of

 39
2

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

they do not oppose any sealing motions filed by any non-parties in this action. (ECF No. 

1136.) Upon review of the moving papers, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in 

part the motions.

LEGAL STANDARD

There is a presumptive right of public access to court records based upon the 

common law and the first amendment. See Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 

589, 597 (1978); Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. General Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 

1212-13 (9th Cir. 2002). Nonetheless, access may be denied to protect sensitive 

confidential information. Courts are more likely to protect information covered by Rule 

26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but are not limited by items listed in 

protective orders. See KL Group v. Case, Kay, & Lynch, 829 F.2d 909, 917-19 (9th Cir. 

1987) (letter to client from attorney); Kalinauskas v. Wong, 151 F.R.D. 363, 365-67 

(D. Nev. 1993) (confidential settlement agreement). 

“Unless a particular court record is one traditionally kept secret, a strong 

presumption in favor of access is the starting point.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of 

Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-80 (9th Cir. 2006) (citing Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. 

Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). “In order to overcome this strong 

presumption, a party seeking to seal a judicial record must articulate justifications for 

sealing that outweigh the historical right of access and the public policies favoring 

disclosure.” Id. at 1178-79. 

The presumption of access is “based on the need for federal courts, although 

independent—indeed, particularly because they are independent—to have a measure of 

accountability and for the public to have confidence in the administration of justice.” 

United States v. Amodeo (Amodeo II ), 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995); see also Valley 

Broad. Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court—D. Nev., 798 F.2d 1289, 1294 (9th Cir.1986) (explaining 

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of

 39
3

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

that the presumption of public access “promot[es] the public's understanding of the 

judicial process and of significant public events”).

Accordingly, “[a] party seeking to seal a judicial record then bears the burden of 

overcoming this strong presumption by meeting the ‘compelling reasons' standard.” 

Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178. Under this stringent standard, a court may seal records only 

when it finds “a compelling reason and articulate[s] the factual basis for its ruling, 

without relying on hypothesis or conjecture.” Id. at 1179. The court must then 

“conscientiously balance[ ] the competing interests of the public and the party who seeks 

to keep certain judicial records secret.” Id. (quoting Foltz, 331 F.3d at 1135) (alteration in 

original) (internal quotation marks omitted). What constitutes a “compelling reason” is 

“best left to the sound discretion of the trial court.” Nixon, 435 U.S. at 599.

Previously, some courts applied a “compelling reason” or “good cause” standard 

for sealing depending on whether the pending motion was dispositive or non-dispositive. 

E.g., Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1180 (9th Cir. 2006) (parties seeking to seal documents in a 

dispositive motion must provide “compelling reasons” to support a sealing whereas for 

non-dispositive motions the parties must show a lesser “particularized showing” under 

the “good cause” standard pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)); Phillips ex 

rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2002) (when a 

party attaches a sealed discovery document to a nondispositive motion, the usual 

presumption of the public's right of access is rebutted).

Other courts rejected this binary approach. In re Midland National Life Insurance 

Company Annuity Sales Practices Litigation, 686 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir.2012), is one such 

case that rejected the literal dispositive/nondispositive label. In that case, an intervenor 

moved to unseal documents attached to a Daubert motion. Id. at 1118. The district court, 

like the district court here, concluded that the documents should remain under seal 

because “the Daubert motion was non-dispositive,” as it “would not have been a 

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of

 39
4

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

determination on the merits of any claim or defense.” Id. at 1119. The Ninth Circuit 

rejected the district court's focus on whether the motion was literally “dispositive”: “That 

the records are connected to a Daubert motion does not, on its own, conclusively resolve 

the issue.” Id. As the motion, in effect, “pertain[ed] to central issues bearing on 

defendant's summary judgment motion,” we treated that motion as dispositive. Id. 

Similarly, the court in Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1100 

(9th Cir. 2016) observed that it would not allow the technically nondispositive nature of a

Daubert motion to cloud the reality that it was able to significantly affect the disposition 

of the issues in the case. 

Here, the motions to seal relate to numerous potential trial exhibits and deposition 

designations that the parties may intend to call into evidence at trial. This Court will 

apply the “compelling reasons” standard to these motions and related briefing as those 

submissions pertain to central issues at trial and are “more than tangentially related to the 

underlying cause of action.” Ctrs. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099 

(9th Cir. 2016). 

Compelling reasons for sealing information exist “when such ‘court files might 

have become a vehicle for improper purposes,’ such as the use of records to gratify 

private spite, promote public scandal, circulate libelous statements, or release trade 

secrets.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179 (quoting Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598). Trade secrets 

“may consist of any formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used 

in one’s business, and which gives him an opportunity to obtain advantage over 

competitions who do not know or use it.” Restatement (First) of Torts § 757 cmt. b. 

Because trade secrets concern proprietary and sensitive business information not 

available to the public, sealing may be warranted where disclosure would harm a 

litigant’s competitive standing. Nixon, 425 U.S. at 598. 

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 4 of

 39
5

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Ninth Circuit has explicitly recognized that compelling reasons exist for the 

sealing of “pricing terms, royalty rates, and guaranteed minimum payment terms” of 

license agreements. See In re Elec. Arts, Inc., 298 F. App’x 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008). 

Courts in this circuit have also recognized that information subject to confidentiality 

agreements may also meet the “compelling reasons” standard when accompanied by a 

particularized factual showing. See Foltz, 331 F.3d at 1137-38. 

DISCUSSION

The Court now turns to the substance of the instant sealing motions. The majority 

of information that the movants seek to seal constitutes confidential business information 

of the parties, including trade secrets, proprietary business records, discussions of internal 

strategy, company dealings, and materials designated as “Highly Confidential.” To the 

extent that the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored and relate to the rationale above, 

the Court agrees that the movants have demonstrated that compelling reasons exist for 

sealing the information subsumed by these categories. Analysis from this Court’s prior 

orders granting the movants’ motions to seal is applicable here. (See ECF Nos. 1143 and 

1155.) 

However, the Court also finds that some of the information that the movants seek 

to seal is stale, overbroad, or relate to key issues in the case. Even where the parties seek 

to cover information that may properly be sealed, they should seek to seal only the 

narrowly sealable information and not whole paragraphs, documents, sections, or 

presentations that do not justify extensive redaction. In some documents, the information 

at issue is too general to warrant sealing. Other suggested redactions would 

inappropriately shield stale information that is too old to be presently confidential. And 

yet other redacted exhibits in their current states would close from the public exhibits that 

relate to issues at the heart of this case, including a variety of SULAs, testimony about 

Qualcomm’s rates and Qualcomm’s leverage. In light of the public’s right to access, this 

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 5 of

 39
6

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Court finds no colorable justification to seal those exhibits in their presently proposed 

form. Repeated requests to close and clear the courtroom would be unduly cumbersome 

to the Court’s interest in managing the trial. Sealing such information would hamstring 

the parties and stymie them from litigating key issues effectively and efficiently. 

Furthermore, over-sealing crucial exhibits would impede the jury and the public’s ability 

to understand the nature of the proceedings and the factual basis for the parties’ claims. 

As such, the Court finds that the movants have not articulated “compelling 

reasons” to keep all the requested information from the public. Accordingly, the sealing 

motions at ECF Nos. 1076, 1083, 1091, 1101, 1113, 1073, 1095, 1099, 1118, 1105 filed 

by Asustek, AT&T, Ericsson, Kyocera, LGE, HTC, Lenovo/Motorola, ZTE, Nokia, 

Ericsson, and Interdigital are GRANTED. The sealing motions at ECF Nos. 1116, 1110, 

1085, 1090, 1087, 1102, and 1093 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 

The Court instructs the parties to introduce – if called at trial – redacted versions of their 

documents consistent with the following tables.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 15, 2019

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 6 of

 39
7

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ASUSTek’s Appendix A

Exhibit Information To Be Sealed 

According to ASUSTek

Ruling

DTX00842 Pages Bates stamped

Pegatron_0000807204 –

0000807207

GRANTED.

PTX010198 Page Bates stamped 

QNDCAL02952131, the

material indicated as a

black outline.

GRANTED.

AT&T’s Appendix A

Exhibit

Information Sought to Be 

Sealed According to AT&TRuling

DTX00298 Exhibit in full GRANTED.

DTX00399 Exhibit in full GRANTED.

DTX00401 Exhibit in full GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 7 of

 39
8

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BlackBerry’s Exhibit A Exhibits

Exhibit Information Sought To 

Be Sealed

According to BlackBerry

Basis for Objection

PTX000154 Portions highlighted in 

blue in Exhibit B to the 

Grubbs Decl.

GRANTED.

PTX000891 Portions highlighted in 

blue in Exhibit C to the 

Grubbs Decl.

GRANTED.

PTX000904 Portions highlighted in 

blue in Exhibit D to the 

Grubbs Decl.

GRANTED.

PTX000910 Portions highlighted in 

blue in Exhibit E to the

Grubbs Decl.

GRANTED.

PTX001007 Portions highlighted in 

blue in Exhibit F to the 

Grubbs Decl.

GRANTED.

PTX001238 Portions highlighted in 

blue in Exhibit G to the 

Grubbs Decl.

GRANTED.

PTX002144 Portions highlighted in 

blue in Exhibit H to the 

Grubbs Decl.

GRANTED.

PTX003658 Portions highlighted in 

blue in Exhibit I to the 

Grubbs Decl.

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 8 of

 39
9

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BlackBerry’s Exhibit A Deposition Designations

Deponent 

Name

Depositio

n Date

Information 

Sought to Be 

Sealed

Basis for Objection

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 41:23-42:1 DENIED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 42:11-14 DENIED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 42:23-25 DENIED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 43:2-6 DENIED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 43:9 DENIED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 46:16-19 DENIED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 75:3 DENIED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 76:22 DENIED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 182:22-25 DENIED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 197:19-198:5 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 198:21-199:6 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 199:8-199:18 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 236:1-7 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 253:3-6 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 253:12-21 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 254:1-5 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 257:25-258:6 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John 3/1/2018 259:1-9 GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 9 of

 39
10

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Broadcom’s Appendix A Exhibits

Exhibit

Information Sought 

to Be Sealed

By Broadcom

Ruling

DTX00523 

(BCRM00238)

BCRM000239

-250

DENIED as overbroad. The Court 

instructs the party to confer and 

submit narrower redactions. 

DTX00526/PTX00 2235 

(BCRM000397)

BCRM00397-

399

DENIED.

DTX00529 

(BRCM172776)

Entirety DENIED as overbroad. The Court 

instructs the party to confer and 

submit narrower redactions. 

DTX00532 

(BRCM173163)

Entirety DENIED as overbroad. The Court 

instructs the party to confer and 

submit narrower redactions. 

DTX00535 

(BRCM174046)

Entirety DENIED as overbroad. The Court 

instructs the party to confer and 

submit narrower redactions. 

DTX00538 

(BRCM175716)

Entirety DENIED as overbroad. The Court 

instructs the party to confer and 

submit narrower redactions. 

DTX00541

(BROADCOMUSFTC00000100)

Entirety DENIED as overbroad. The Court 

instructs the party to confer and 

submit narrower redactions. 

DTX01007 

(Q2017MDL3_000 

30289)

Entirety DENIED as overbroad and stale. The 

Court instructs the party to confer and 

submit narrower redactions. 

DTX01005/ PTX03531 

(Q2017MDL3_00019 027)

Entirety DENIED as overbroad and stale. The 

Court instructs the party to confer and 

submit narrower redactions. 

PTX00612 (ERICQCOM_SDCA00002083)

Pages 3-29 GRANTED.

PTX001302 

(BRCM173791)

Entirety GRANTED.

PTX001321 

(BRCM176046)

Entirety GRANTED.

PTX001955 

(BRCM174102)

Entirety GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 10

 of 39
11

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Broadcom Appendix A Deposition Designations

Deponent Name

Deposition 

Date

Information Sought to 

be Sealed by 

Broadcom

Ruling

McGregor, Scott 3/28/2018 17:4-21 DENIED.

McGregor, Scott 3/28/2018 175:23-176:18

176:20-177:18

179:11-180:20

DENIED.

McGregor, Scott 3/28/2018 184:11-24

187:12-188:1

DENIED.

McGregor, Scott 3/28/2018 240:17-24 DENIED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 11

 of 39
12

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Ericsson Appendix A

Exhibit

Information Sought to Be 

Sealed According to 

Ericsson

Ruling

DTX00565 §§ 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, and

7.5; App’x

1; App’x 2

GRANTED.

PTX003665 Portion of §§ 2.1 and 

3.4.4

GRANTED.

PTX003657 §§ 4.1, 4.4 GRANTED.

PTX001179 Pages 4, 6, 7, 8, 14, and

15

Portions of pages 15, 16,

17, 18, 19,

and 26

GRANTED.

PTX001241 Pages 12, 17, and 18

Portions of pages 13, 15,

22, 69, 84,

and 85

GRANTED.

PTX001251 Portions of pages 20, 31,

38, 43, 49,

and 54

GRANTED.

PTX002327 Portions of pages 5, 21,

22, 26, and

28

GRANTED.

PTX003066 Portion of second-to-last 

paragraph

GRANTED.

DTX02568 Entire document GRANTED.

PTX006414 Entire document GRANTED.

PTX006415 Entire document GRANTED.

PTX006416 Entire document GRANTED.

PTX006417 Entire document GRANTED.

PTX006418 Entire document GRANTED.

PTX006421 Entire document GRANTED.

PTX006422 Entire document GRANTED.

PTX006423 Entire document GRANTED.

PTX006424 Entire document GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 12

 of 39
13

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HTC Appendix A

Will Call Exhibits

Exhibit

Information Sought to Be 

Sealed According to HTC Ruling

PTX003548 Up-front license fees GRANTED.

amount under §3 of the

SULA (p. 9) and up-front

license fees stated in

letter dated December 20,

2000 (p. 45)

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 13

 of 39
14

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Other Exhibits

Exhibit

Information Sought to Be Sealed According to 

HTC

Ruling

DTX03585 HTC’s up-front license fee amount under §3 of the 

SULA (p.10) and HTC’s

up-front license fees stated in letter dated December 

20,

2000 (p. 46)

GRANTED.

DTX03661 QC’s contributions to HTC under §§ 2.2, 2.3, and 

strategic fund cap amounts under §§ 2.4 and

2.5 of Strategic Fund

Agreement (pp. 2 and 3)

GRANTED.

DTX04555 HTC’s up-front license fees amount under §3 of 

the SULA (p. 12)

GRANTED.

PTX003635 QC’s fund payments (annual cap, quarterly 

reimbursement cap and expenditure) to HTC under

§§ 1, 2, 3 (pp.1-4, 6), price calculation in Exhibit A 

(p. 12) and quarter caps in Exhibit B under Strategic

Agreement (p. 13).

GRANTED.

PTX003789 QC’s contributions to HTC under §§ 2.2, 2.3, and 

strategic fund cap and amounts under §§

2.4 and 2.5 of Strategic Fund Agreement (pp. 2 and 3)

GRANTED.

PTX001512 QC’s NRE payments to HTC under §2 of NRE and 

Development Agreement for Multiple Subscriber 

Units (p. 1)

QC’s fund payments (annual cap, quarterly 

reimbursement cap and expenditure) to HTC under

§§1, 2, 3 (pp. 6-9, 11),

price calculation in Exhibit A (p. 17) and quarter caps 

in Exhibit

B under Strategic

Agreement (p. 18)

GRANTED.

PTX001609 QC’s reimbursement amounts to HTC (p. 5) GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 14

 of 39
15

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Huawei’s Appendix A 

DTX01440 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages with Bates ending 1237, 1238, 

1239, and 1241.

GRANTED.

DTX01454 Yellow-highlighted portions on

pages with Bates ending 5611 and 

5612.

GRANTED.

DTX15685 Seal in its entirety. GRANTED.

PTX001861 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages 002-012.

GRANTED.

PTX001869 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages 001 and 003.

GRANTED.

PTX001916 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages 001-004.

GRANTED.

PTX001941 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages 002-005.

GRANTED.

PTX001963 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages with Bates ending 1222, 1224, 

and 1226-1230.

GRANTED.

PTX002143 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages with Bates ending 1259- 1263, 

and 1268.

GRANTED.

PTX002914 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages 6, 15, 16, 21 and 26.

GRANTED.

PTX002933 Yellow-highlighted portions on pages 

with Bates ending 12572-

12573.

GRANTED.

PTX003122 Yellow-highlighted portions on pages 

with Bates ending 20043-

20048, and 20050.

GRANTED.

PTX003250 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages 007-009.

GRANTED.

PTX003251 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages 008-010.

GRANTED.

PTX003320 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages 002-003.

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 15

 of 39
16

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PTX003429 Yellow-highlighted portions on 

pages 004-007, 011, and 013.

GRANTED.

PTX003569 Yellow-highlighted portions on pages 

with Bates ending 698 and 701.

GRANTED.

PTX003616 Yellow-highlighted portions on pages 

with Bates ending 0684-0688, and 0695.

GRANTED.

PTX003733 Seal in its entirety. GRANTED.

PTX003735 Yellow-highlighted portions on pages 

with Bates ending 1585, 1588-

1595 and 1605.

GRANTED.

JTX116 Yellow-highlighted portions on pages 

with Bates ending 7278, 7283,

7285-87, 7291, 7332, and 7334.

GRANTED.

JTX126 Yellow-highlighted portions on pages 

010-016, 019-022, 031-032,

040, 046, 054, 055, 056, and 071-

078.

GRANTED.

JTX127 Yellow-highlighted portion on page 008. GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 16

 of 39
17

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Huawei’s Deposition Designations

Deponent 

Name

Deposition 

Date

Information 

Sought to be 

Sealed 

According to 

Huawei

Basis for 

Objection

Ding, 

Jianxin

3/12/2018 55:1, 60:16, 

112:6-11,

122:8-25, 126:14-

22,

152:20-153:25

DENIED with 

respect to 

55:1,60:16

122:8-25

126:14-22. 

GRANTED as to the 

remainder.

Ding, 

Jianxin

3/12/2018 100:16-101:7 DENIED.

Ding,

Jianxin

3/13/2018 190:10-13, 

250:21-25,

254:2-7

GRANTED.

Yu, 

Nanfen

3/14/2018 47:22-48:3 GRANTED.

Wang, Li

Qiang

3/15/2018 26:2-8, 35:8-20, 

59:19-23

DENIED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 17

 of 39
18

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Intel’s Exhibit A 

Exhibit

Bates Range 

Provided by the 

Parties

Information Sought to be 

Sealed by Intel Ruling

DTX00014 86601DOC015

482-83

PDF page 7 DENIED.

DTX00016 86601DOC034

407-8

86601DOC034408 pages

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,

86001DOC034409 pages

2, 4, 6

DENIED.

DTX00056 AAPL-FTC00100545-

553

AAPL-FTC00100547- 49, 51-2GRANTED.

DTX00057 AAPL-FTC00100753-

65

AAPL-FTC- 00100757, 

59-60, 64

GRANTED.

DTX00085 AAPL-FTC00132140-

42

AAPL-FTC-00132140-41 GRANTED.

DTX00635 INTELQCOM00002 2 

031

INTELQCOM000022060; 105GRANTED.

DTX00646 INTELQCOM00021 4 

960

INTELQCOM000214967-

980

GRANTED.

DTX00648 INTELQCOM00021 5 

595

INTELQCOM000215599- 613GRANTED.

DTX00649 INTELQCOM00021 5

821-25

INTEL-QC0M000215825 GRANTED.

DTX00654 INTELQCOM00035 4 

039-44

INTELQCOM000354040- 44

DENIED as overbroad. 

The Court instructs the 

party to confer and submit 

narrower redactions. 

DTX00656 INTELQCOM00048 7 

295-299

INTELQCOM000487295- 99

DENIED as overbroad. 

The Court instructs the 

party to confer and submit 

narrower redactions. 

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 18

 of 39
19

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DTX00674 INTELQCOM00223 6 

311-12

INTELQCOM002236313-

317, 320-326

DENIED as overbroad. 

The Court instructs the 

party to confer and submit 

narrower redactions. 

DTX00675 INTELQCOM002458 604-

70

INTEL- QCOM002458608-

12; 14-16, 18-20, 22-23, 25-

26, 29, 31-32, 36, 39-49,

51-53, 56, 60-63, 65-68.

DENIED as 

overbroad with 

repsect to pages. 9, 

12,

14, 23, 49. 

GRANTED with 

respect to the 

remainder

DTX00681 INTELQCOM003057 387-

481

INTEL- QCOM003057387, 

392-

3, 395-396, 398-400, 402-

414, 416-418, 421-429

GRANTED.

DTX00692 INTELQCOM004909 037

INTELQCOM004909039-74, 83-

93, 95

GRANTED.

DTX00704 INTELQCOM007541 467-

74

INTELQCOM007541467-74

DENIED as overbroad. 

The Court instructs the 

party to confer and submit 

narrower redactions. 

DTX01426 BAIN00051010 Slide nos. 3, 4, 8, 12, 17-

19, 27, 292

DENIED.

DTX00689

INTELQCOM004269 911-

13-999

INTELQCOM004269912, 14-

18, 22-39, 41-53, 56-65,

67-68, 69-73, 77-81, 83-

85, 88-97, 99.

DENIED as overbroad. 

The Court instructs the 

party to confer and submit 

narrower redactions. 

PTX001422 AAPL-FTC0035199-200AAPL-FTC-0035200 GRANTED.

PTX001457 AAPL-FTC00010253-56AAPL-FTC-00010255-56 GRANTED.

PTX001496 APL-QC-FTC34560911-31

APL-QC-FTC-34560912, 17-

18, 21-23, 25

GRANTED.

PTX002095 INTELQCOM005886 053-

84

INTELQCOM005886062, 84.GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 19

 of 39
20

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PTX002135 AAPL-FTC00108170-211

AAPL-FTC-00108182, 188, 

190, 192, 194, 195,

208,

GRANTED.

PTX002189 AAPL-FTC00128661-65

AAPL-FTC-001286634- 64 GRANTED.

PTX002450 86600DOC096

994-018

86600DOC097000 GRANTED.

PTX002552 86600DOC097

253-68

86600DOC097258-60,

62-64.

GRANTED.

PTX002575 86600DOC001

657-86

86600DOC001661-63,

66-68

GRANTED.

PTX002594 INTELQCOM008124 586-

663

INTELQCOM008124587:

Redactions on pages 10, 12, 

22, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,

31, 32, 33, 34

DENIED as overbroad with 

respect to pages 11 and 23. 

The Court instructs the 

party to confer and submit 

narrower redactions. 

GRANTED with respect to 

the remainder.

PTX002621 INTELQCOM000420 594-

607

INTEL- QCOM000420594: 

pages 1, 2; INTELQCOM000420596: pages

2, 5, 6, 7, 9

GRANTED.

PTX002762 AAPL-FTC00153047-9AAPL-FTC-00153047-9 GRANTED.

PTX002768 INTELQCOM008077 974 

-87

INTEL- QCOM008077976, 

979

GRANTED.

PTX002976 INTELQCOM000498

642 -60

INTEL- QCOM000498644-

652,

656, 658

GRANTED.

PTX003027 INTELQCOM005100 52-

99

INTEL-QCOM00510052, 55-

57, 59, 61-69, 71-76,

80, 82-84, 87, 89, 95-96,

98-99

GRANTED.

PTX003458 INTELQCOM005712

072 (native)

Withhold in full (native) GRANTED.

PTX003732 INTELQCOM007951

655-711

INTELQCOM007951655-711GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 20

 of 39
21

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PTX003745 AAPL-FTC00130920-27AAPL-FTC-00130920-27 GRANTED.

PTX010861 INTELQCOM007541 467

INTELQCOM007541467-69, 71-

74.

GRANTED.

PTX011130 INTEL- QC1065-

2_008014960

(native)

Withhold in full (native) GRANTED.

PTX011131 INTELQC1065_00077

703 (native)

INTELQC1065_00077703-05GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 21

 of 39
22

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Intel’s Appendix A Deposition Designations

Deponent 

Name

Deposition 

Date

Information Sought to be 

Sealed by Intel Objection

Wolff 2/7/2018 124:2-124:4; 124:13-124:14-

124:16-124:19

GRANTED.

Constantine 2/16/2018 3:15:6-17; 317:15-317:22,

317:25-318:1, 318:3-319:3,

320:3-6, 320:9-320:14

GRANTED.

Keddy 3/7/2018 113:1-113:4; 113:25-114:12;

115:13-116:2

GRANTED.

Keddy 3/7/2018 123:14-124:8, 124:10-125:3;

125:12-125:23, 127:7-127:22;

129:5-129:11

GRANTED.

Eul 3/21/2018 187:5-187:15 DENIED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 22

 of 39
23

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

InterDigital Appendix A 

Exhibit

Information 

Sought to be 

Sealed by 

InterDigital

Ruling

Exhibit 1 - DTX00266

(APL-QCFTC_15569990)

Correspondence 

in full

GRANTED.

Exhibit 2 - DTX00856 

(Pegatron_0001284829)

Agreement in 

full

GRANTED.

Exhibit 3 - DTX00861 

(Pegatron_1000000001)

Correspondence 

and agreement in 

full

GRANTED.

Exhibit 4 - DTX01363 

(Wistron_1000000105)

Agreement in 

full

GRANTED.

Exhibit 5 - DTX01478 

(Wistron_1000000113)

Agreement in 

full

GRANTED.

Exhibit 6 - PTX003767 

(APL-QC_00451156)

Agreement in 

full

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 23

 of 39
24

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kyocera’s Appendix A

Exhibit

Information Sought to Be Sealed 

According to Kyocera Ruling

PTX011074 Highly confidential business 

information regarding licenses granted 

by Kyocera and certain non-parties 

and license payments and royalty rates 

agreed to by Kyocera.

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 24

 of 39
25

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Lenovo and Motorola’s Appendix A

Exhibit

Info. Sought to be Sealed According to Lenovo and 

Motorola Objection

DTX00713 / 

PTX002064

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith

under seal as Exhibit A.

GRANTED.

DTX00736

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit B.

GRANTED.

DTX00890 / 

DTX10497

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version

filed herewith under seal as Exhibit C.

GRANTED.

DTX02788

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as

Exhibit D.

GRANTED.

DTX10941

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith

under seal as Exhibit E.

GRANTED.

DTX15716 / 

DTX15717

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version

filed herewith under seal as Exhibit F.

GRANTED.

PTX002027

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit G.

GRANTED.

PTX002412

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit H.

GRANTED.

PTX002520

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit I.

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 25

 of 39
26

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PTX002540

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit J.

GRANTED.

PTX002546

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit K.

GRANTED.

PTX002570

Seal in its entirety (alternatively, at least redact pages 

MOTO- QUAL- 01933600 to 01933608 as

irrelevant to the current litigation and confidential). An 

unredacted version filed herewith under seal as Exhibit L.

GRANTED.

PTX002596

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit M.

GRANTED.

PTX002597

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit N.

GRANTED.

PTX002598

Seal in its entirety. An unredacted version filed herewith 

under seal as Exhibit O.

GRANTED.

PTX002645

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit P.

GRANTED.

PTX002775 / 

PTX002776

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit Q.

GRANTED.

PTX002875

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit R.

GRANTED.

PTX002876

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith

under seal as Exhibit S.

GRANTED.

PTX002886

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit T.

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 26

 of 39
27

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PTX002895

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit U.

GRANTED.

PTX002967

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith

under seal as Exhibit V.

GRANTED.

PTX003083

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit W.

GRANTED.

PTX003110

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed 

herewith under seal as Exhibit X.

GRANTED.

PTX003393

Portions highlighted in pink in the

unredacted version filed herewith under seal as Exhibit 

Y.

GRANTED.

DTX00341

Provisionally seal entire exhibit

until copy provided to Lenovo and Motorola

GRANTED.

DTX00381

Provisionally seal entire exhibit until copy provided to 

Lenovo and Motorola

GRANTED.

DTX00395

Provisionally seal entire exhibit until copy provided to 

Lenovo and Motorola

GRANTED.

DTX01207

Provisionally seal entire exhibit until copy provided to 

Lenovo and Motorola

GRANTED.

DTX01415

Provisionally seal entire exhibit until copy provided to 

Lenovo and Motorola

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 27

 of 39
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LGE’s Appendix A

Exhibit

Information Sought to be Sealed by LGE

Ruling

PTX003779 Full document GRANTED.

PTX003759 Definitions of

“Major Snapdragon Subscriber Unit

Model” “Other Snapdragon Subscriber Unit

Model” “Quarterly Indemnity Cap” and

“Yearly Indemnity Cap,” Sections 2.1,

2.2.2, 3.1, 3.2, and select text from

Section 4.1

GRANTED.

March 30, 

2018 Hague 

Convention 

Testimony 

of Hwi-Jae 

Cho

¶¶ 238, 245, 247–48 GRANTED.

PTX002699 Full document GRANTED.

PTX011259 Section 1, only “Net

Revenues” and

“Qualifying

Handsets”

definitions; Section

2(a); and column

heading in Exhibit

A

GRANTED.

PTX011254 Full document GRANTED.

PTX011258 Full document GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 28

 of 39
29

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MediaTek’s Appendix A Exhibits

Exhibit Information To Be Sealed By MediaTek

Basis for Objection

DTX00765 MTK_00296018

(customer name)

p. 3 (customer name); pp. 26-32 in full;

pp. 8-9 (customer name)

GRANTED.

DTX00769 pp. 14; 23 GRANTED.

DTX00770 MTK_00523907- MTK_00523910 

(last

two columns); MTK_00523913 in

full

DENIED with respect to 

page 15. GRANTED with 

respect to the remainder.

DTX00780 Sealed in full DENIED as overbroad. The 

Court instructs the party to 

confer and submit narrower 

redactions. 

PTX001787 MTK_00184574

(client name); MTK_00184576 (two

bullet points and customer name); 

MTK_001 84577

(customer name)

GRANTED.

PTX002501 MTK_00240759

(paragraph 3); MTK_00240760

(paragraphs 3-5 in top

email, last line on page);

MTK_00240761 (Actions

(1), (3)-(6))

GRANTED.

PTX002904 MTK_00283679 (first three paragraphs on 

page and last three paragraphs on page); 

MTK_00283680 (first 5 bullet points)

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 29

 of 39
30

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PTX003447 pp. 3-18 in full GRANTED.

PTX003296 Customer names throughout;

MTK_00335942

(second bullet point)

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 30

 of 39
31

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MediaTek’s Appendix A Deposition Designations 

Deponent 

Name Deposition 

Date

Information to be 

Sealed by 

MediaTek

Ruling

Moynihan, 3/12/2018 68:17-21 GRANTED.

John Finbarr 121:10-121:25

122:2

141:14-15

141:17-21

158:16-18

158:21-159:5

159:7-9

163:3-7

271:19-272:22

275:25-276:5

276:21-277:19

323:17-23

323:25-324:9

Moynihan, 3/13/2018 427:13-17 GRANTED.

John Finbarr 428:15-429:1

429:13-21

429:23

430:2-7

430:19-431:3

431:10-11

431:13-16

431:18-20

431:22

432:5-8

432:10-13

432:15

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 31

 of 39
32

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Nokia’s Appendix A Exhibits

Exhibit Information Sought to be

Sealed

Ruling

DTX01002 Excerpts from the Subscriber Unit License 

Agreement between Qualcomm and Nokia, 

dated July 22, 2008 (highlighted in red)

GRANTED.

DTX546 Excerpts from the Patent License Agreement 

between Nokia Corp., Nokia Siemens B.V. and 

Compal Communications,

executed on June 12, 2009 (highlighted in red)

GRANTED.

DTX1207 Excerpts from the Patent License Agreement 

between Nokia and Chi Mei, dated March 3, 

2009 (highlighted in red)

GRANTED.

PTX3357 Excerpts from various agreements between 

Apple

GRANTED.

Nokia’s Appendix A Deposition Designation

Deponent 

Name

Deposition 

Date

Information 

Sought to 

be Sealed 

by Nokia

Ruling

Teksler, 4/20/2018 274:9-17 GRANTED.

Boris

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 32

 of 39
33

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Samsung’s Appendix A Exhibits

Exhibit Ruling

Internal Samsung negotiation report

DTX01475 at SFT-0036174-76

Granted.

2004 SULA

Amendment

JTX117 at Q2017MDL3_000 17698-

705

Granted.

2009 SULA

Amendment

JTX119 at SFT- 0000113-199

Granted.

2018 SULA Amendment

DTX01463;

PTX003795;

DTX01462; and

DTX01462; and

QAPPCMSD0216

3037-068

Granted.

2018 Strategic Relationship Agmt.

PTX003796; DTX01462; and 

PTX003471 at

QAPPCMSD0216 3069-076

Granted.

2018 Settlement Agmt.

DTX01038; PTX003798; DTX01462; 

and PTX003471 at QAPPCMSD0216

3083-097

Granted.

2018 Patent

Component Agmt. DTX01464; 

PTX003799; DTX01462; and 

PTX003471 at

QAPPCMSD0216 3098-113

Granted.

2018 Tech. Collab. Agmt.

DTX01039; DTX01462; and

PTX003471 at

Granted.

QAPPCMSD0216 3114-133 Granted.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 33

 of 39
34

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Samsung’s Appendix A Deposition Designations

Deponent 

Name

Deposition 

Date

Information Sought 

to be Sealed by 

Samsung

Basis for Objection

Lee, Injung 3/14/18 58:22; 58:25

(numeric values)

GRANTED.

Lee, Injung 3/14/18 59:1; 59:4 (numeric 

values)

GRANTED.

Lee, Injung 3/14/18 106:5-7 GRANTED.

Lee, Injung 3/15/18 144:16-18, 25; 145:1-

6, 11-18, 21-23

GRANTED.

Lee, Injung 3/15/18 255:19-256:12 DENIED.

Kim, 

Yooseok

3/21/18 29:23-30:12 GRANTED.

Kim, 

Yooseok

3/22/18 138:1-8 GRANTED.

Kang, 

Hojin 

(Alex)

2/28/18 89:20-90:19 DENIED.

Ahn, Seung 

Ho

3/29/18 181:9-12 GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 34

 of 39
35

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sony’s Appendix A Exhibits

Exhibit

Information Sought to Be 

Sealed by Sony Basis for Objection

PTX001474 Q2017MDL1_00779810 -

Q2017MDL1_00779814

GRANTED. 

PTX001558 Q2014FTC01360358 -

Q2014FTC01360362

GRANTED.

PTX001567 Q2014FTC01491780 -

Q2014FTC01491788

GRANTED.

Sony’s Non-Will Call Exhibits

Exhibit Information Sought to Be 

Sealed by Sony Basis for Objection

DTX00882 Q2014FTC02577811 -

Q2014FTC02577815

GRANTED.

DTX00964 Q2017MDL1_01206693 -

Q2017MDL1_01206698

GRANTED.

DTX03027 Q2014FTC00384622 -

Q2014FTC00384652

DENIED as overbroad. The Court 

instructs the party to confer and 

submit narrower redactions. 

DTX03046 Q2014FTC00660708 -

Q2014FTC00660770

DENIED as overbroad. 

The Court instructs the 

party to confer and submit 

narrower redactions. 

DTX03048 Q2014FTC00702283 -

Q2014FTC00702315

DENIED as overbroad. The 

Court instructs the party to 

confer and submit narrower 

redactions. 

DTX03148 Q2014FTC02033652 -

Q2014FTC02033664

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 35

 of 39
36

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DTX03201 Q2014FTC02755825 -

Q2014FTC02755829

DENIED.

JTX122 Q2017MDL1_03030090 -

Q2017MDL1_03030121

DENIED as overbroad. The 

Court instructs the party to 

confer and submit narrower 

redactions. 

JTX123 Q2017MDL1_03111128 -

Q2017MDL1_03111135

DENIED as overbroad. The 

Court instructs the party to 

confer and submit narrower 

redactions. 

JTX131 Q2017MDL1_03115389 -

Q2017MDL1_03115523

DENIED as overbroad. The 

Court instructs the party to 

confer and submit narrower 

redactions. 

PTX001269 Q2017MDL1_01206693 -

Q2017MDL1_01206698

GRANTED.

PTX001272 Q2017MDL1_01206699 -

Q2017MDL1_01206705

GRANTED.

PTX001287 QNDCAL03064520 -

QNDCAL03064825

GRANTED.

PTX001290 Q2017MDL1_01855129 -

Q2017MDL1_01855141

GRANTED.

PTX001303 Q2017MDL1_00269206 -

Q2017MDL1_00269228

GRANTED.

PTX001517 Q2017MDL1_01445020 -

Q2017MDL1_01445025

GRANTED.

PTX001527 Q2017MDL1_01199818 -

Q2017MDL1_01199822

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 36

 of 39
37

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PTX001528 QNDCAL03527861 -

QNDCAL03527865

GRANTED.

PTX001543 Q2017MDL1_02279480 -

Q2017MDL1_02279483

GRANTED.

PTX001545 Q2017MDL1_0260171-

Q2017MDL1_02601716

GRANTED.

PTX001546 Q2017MDL1_00289060 -

Q2017MDL1_00289063

GRANTED.

PTX001549 QNDCAL04488551 -

QNDCAL04488558

GRANTED.

PTX003683 Q2017MDL1_02322296 -

Q2017MDL1_02322338

GRANTED.

PTX003750 Q2017MDL1_03115336 -

Q2017MDL1_03115388

GRANTED.

PTX011048 Q2017MDL1_01199710 -

Q2017MDL1_01199715

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 37

 of 39
38

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sony’s Appendix A Deposition Designations

Deponent Name Deposition 

Date

Information 

Sought to Be 

Sealed

Objection

Arthur Lee Hill, IV 5/15/2018 32:12-33:12 GRANTED.

Arthur Lee Hill, IV 5/15/2018 33:24-34:4 GRANTED.

Arthur Lee Hill, IV 5/15/2018 37:7-37:15 GRANTED.

Arthur Lee Hill, IV 5/15/2018 74:18-74:20 GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 38

 of 39
39

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ZTE’s Appendix A Exhibits

Exhibit

Information Sought to 

Be Sealed By ZTE Basis for Objection

PTX002569 ZTE50296-ZTE50306

in full

GRANTED. 

PTX002666 ZTE50942 in full GRANTED.

PTX2640 Q2014FTC04597436- Q2014FTC04597439

(in full)

GRANTED.

ZTE’s Appendix A Deposition Designations

Deponent 

Name Deposition Date

Information 

Sought to 

Be Sealed

Basis for Objection

Blaylock, 

Richard

2/27/2018 34:2-34:9 GRANTED.

Blaylock, 

Richard

2/27/2018 228:24-

229:2

GRANTED.

Blaylock, 

Richard

2/27/2018 230:20-

231:9

GRANTED.

Blaylock, 

Richard

2/27/2018 283:12-

283:14

GRANTED.

Blaylock, 

Richard

2/27/2018 283:20-

284:2

GRANTED.

Blaylock, 

Richard

2/27/2018 285:12-

285:13

GRANTED.

Blaylock, 

Richard

2/27/2018 285:15-

285:20

GRANTED.

Blaylock, 

Richard

2/27/2018 316:22-

317:1

GRANTED.

Blaylock, 

Richard

2/27/2018 317:6-

317:16

GRANTED.

Case 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD Document 1172 Filed 04/16/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 39

 of 39