Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00201/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00201-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C 07-00201 EMC 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

David W. Shapiro, Esq. (No. 219265) 

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 874-1000 

Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 

E-mail: dshapiro@bsfllp.com 

Stuart H. Singer, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 

Carlos M. Sires, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 

Telephone: (954) 356-0011 

Facsimile: (954) 356-0022 

E-mail: ssinger@bsfllp.com 

E-mail: csires@bsfllp.com 

Willie E. Gary, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 

GARY, WILLIAMS, PARENTI, FINNEY, LEWIS, 

MCMANUS, WATSON & SPERANDO 

221 East Osceola Street 

Stuart, Florida 34994 

Telephone: (772) 283-8260 

Facsimile: (772) 220-3343 

Email: weg@williegary.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jeff Pokorny and Larry Blenn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

Jeff Pokorny and Larry Blenn 

on behalf of themselves and those similarly 

situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

Quixtar Inc., et al., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 07-00201 EMC 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME 

FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE 

COMPLAINT

[Civil L.R. 6-1 (a)] 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION

On January 10, 2007, Plaintiffs Jeff Pokorny and Larry Blenn filed their Complaint on 

behalf of themselves and those that they allege are similarly situated. Defendants Quixtar, Inc., 

Britt Worldwide L.L.C. and Britt Management, Inc. were served with the Complaint on January 

; ORDER

Case 3:07-cv-00201-SC Document 15 Filed 02/02/07 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C 07-00201 EMC 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

12, 2007. American Multimedia Inc. has not been served, but has agreed to accept service 

effective today by mailing a copy of the complaint to its counsel named below. Defendants Ron 

Puryear, Georgia Lee Puryear, World Wide Group, L.L.C., Bill Britt and Peggy Britt were 

served with the Complaint on January 18, 2007. 

Pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Local Rules for the United States District Court, Northern 

District of California, the parties, by and through their counsel, stipulate that the time for 

Defendants Quixtar, Inc., Ron Puryear, Georgia Lee Puryear, World Wide Group, L.L.C., Britt 

Worldwide L.L.C., American Multimedia Inc., Britt Management, Inc., Bill Britt, and Peggy 

Britt (“Defendants”) to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended to March 

5, 2007. This change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court 

order. 

 SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February 1, 2007 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

By /s/ David W. Shapiro

David W. Shapiro 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Dated: February 1, 2007 BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE 

By /s/ James R. Sobieraj

James R. Sobieraj 

Attorneys for Defendants Quixtar, Inc. 

(Pro Hac Application to be Filed) 

Case 3:07-cv-00201-SC Document 15 Filed 02/02/07 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C 07-00201 EMC 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

Dated: February 1, 2007 WINSTON & CASHATT 

By /s/ C. Matthew Andersen

C. Matthew Andersen 

Attorneys for Defendants Ron Puryear, 

Georgia Lee Puryear, World Wide Group, 

L.L.C. 

(Pro Hac Application to be Filed) 

Dated: February 1, 2007 NORTHERN BLUE, L.L.P. 

By /s/ J. William Blue, Jr. 

J. William Blue, Jr. 

Attorneys for Defendants Britt Worldwide 

L.L.C., American Multimedia Inc., Britt 

Management, Inc., Bill Britt, Peggy Britt 

(Pro Hac Application to be Filed) 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

_________________

Edward M. Chen 

U.S. Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:07-cv-00201-SC Document 15 Filed 02/02/07 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C 07-00201 EMC 4 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

At the time of service I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. My 

business address is 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900, Oakland, California 94612. 

On February 1, 2007, I served the following documents: 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

THE COMPLAINT

I served the documents on the persons below, as follows: 

BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE 

James R. Sobieraj 

NBC Tower, Suite 3600 

455 North Cityfront Plaza Drive 

Chicago, IL 60611-5599 

312.321.4226 - Direct 

312.321.4299 - Fax 

jsobieraj@usebrinks.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Quixtar, Inc. 

WINSTON & CASHATT 

C. Matthew Andersen 

1900 Bank of America Bldg. 

601 W. Riverside 

Spokane, WA 99201 

Email: cma@winstoncashatt.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Ron Puryear, Georgia Lee Puryear, World Wide Group, L.L.C. 

NORTHERN BLUE, L.L.P. 

J. William Blue, Jr. 

1414 Raleigh Road Suite 435 

The Exchange At Meadowmont 

Chapel Hill, NC 27517 

jwb@nbfirm.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Britt Worldwide L.L.C., American Multimedia Inc., Britt 

Management, Inc., Bill Britt, Peggy Britt 

The documents were served pursuant to FRCP 5(b) by the following means: 

 By personal service. I personally delivered the documents to the persons at the 

addresses listed above. (1) For a party represented by an attorney, delivery 

was made to the attorney or at the attorney's office by leaving the documents in 

an envelope or package clearly labeled to identify the attorney being served 

with a receptionist or an individual in charge of the office. (2) For a party, 

delivery was made to the party or by leaving the documents at the party's 

residence with some person not less than 18 years of age between the hours of 

eight in the morning and six in the evening. 

Case 3:07-cv-00201-SC Document 15 Filed 02/02/07 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C 07-00201 EMC 5 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

 By United States mail. I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope or 

package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed above and: 

 deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service, 

with the postage fully prepaid. 

 placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our 

ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's 

practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On 

the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, 

it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States 

Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. 

I am employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The envelope or 

package was placed in the mail at Oakland, California. 

 By overnight delivery. I enclosed the documents in an envelope or package 

provided by an overnight delivery carrier and addressed to the persons at the 

addresses listed above. I placed the envelope or package for collection and 

overnight delivery at an office or a regularly utilized drop box of the overnight 

delivery carrier. 

 By messenger service. I served the documents by placing them in an envelope 

or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed above and/or by 

electronically transmitting the documents and providing them to a professional 

messenger service for service. 

 By fax transmission. Based on an agreement of the parties to accept service 

by fax transmission, I faxed the documents to the persons at the fax numbers 

listed above. No error was reported by the fax machine that I used. A copy of 

the record of the fax transmission, which I printed out, is attached. 

⌧ By e-mail or electronic transmission. Based on a court order or an agreement 

of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused 

the documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed above. I 

did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic 

message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. 

I hereby certify that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court at whose 

direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United 

States of America that the foregoing information contained in the Certificate of Service is true 

and correct. 

Date: February 1, 2007 

/s/ Christina Seki______________________ 

 Christina Seki 

Case 3:07-cv-00201-SC Document 15 Filed 02/02/07 Page 5 of 5