Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00227/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00227-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act

---

STIPULATION FOR 60-DAY EXTENSION OF DATES IDENTIFIED IN PRIOR SCHEDULING ORDERS

- 1 - 

01360-101\00009110.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DANIEL K. KLINGENBERGER, #131134 

DAVID A. DIXON, #221401 

DOWLING, AARON & KEELER, INC. 

Attorneys and Counselors at Law 

5060 California Avenue, Suite 620 

Bakersfield, CA 93309 

Telephone: 661.716.3000 

Facsimile No.: 661.716.3005 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COAST VALLEY ROOFING dba COAST ROOFING 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Counsel for all Parties to the above-captioned action (including all Plaintiffs and all named 

Defendants) have conferred in good faith with regard to case management and calendaring and 

have agreed to the following stipulation and stipulated request seeking the Court’s approval: 

1. The Court entered an earlier scheduling order setting January 11, 2008, as the date for the 

parties to complete alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Based on the anticipated completion of 

ADR on or before that date, the Parties requested and the Court granted extension of the deadline 

for Defendants’ response to the Corrected Amended Complaint until 10 days after the anticipated 

completion of ADR, and the Court continued the next Scheduling Conference in the case until 

February 22, 2008. 

ENRIQUEZ VASQUEZ and JUAN ANDRES 

RUIZ on behalf of a class of similarly situated 

employees,, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COAST VALLEY ROOFING, INC. dba 

COAST ROOFING, 

Defendant.

No. 1:07-cv-00227-OWW-DLB 

STIPULATION FOR 60-DAY 

EXTENSION OF DATES IDENTIFIED 

IN PRIOR SCHEDULING ORDERS 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00227-OWW -GSA Document 34 Filed 01/24/08 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION FOR 60-DAY EXTENSION OF DATES IDENTIFIED IN PRIOR SCHEDULING ORDERS

- 2 - 

01360-101\00009110.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2. The Parties have previously advised the Court regarding their efforts to cooperatively 

manage and resolve the case via mediation or other informal resolution. The Parties continue to 

pursue that path. However, for a period of roughly 60 days during November 2007 through early 

January 2008, the Parties were not able to develop the case sufficiently to complete meaningful 

ADR or other informal resolution. The circumstances for the inactivity in the case during 

November 2007 through early January 2008 were beyond the control of counsel for either Party. 

After counsel for the Parties had agreed to the schedule reflected in the Court’s earlier orders, 

Defendant Coast Valley Roofing, Inc.’s President attempted suicide (according to media reports), 

was hospitalized and was then later arrested and incarcerated on suspicion of a crime unrelated to 

the above-captioned litigation. These unexpected events made it impossible for counsel for the 

Parties in this litigation to proceed with the completion of ADR in the previously agreed 

timeframe. 

3. Counsel for the Parties continue to cooperate to manage the case in a direction toward 

informal resolution. The Parties also understand the Court’s interest in keeping the litigation 

moving forward. If not for the very unusual circumstances identified above that paused the 

development of the case during November 2007 through mid-January 2008, the Parties would not 

make the present stipulated request. But, given those circumstances, the Parties respectfully submit 

that good grounds exist for the Parties’ present request and submit that the Court should grant the 

Parties’ stipulated request for a 60-day extension of the calendar items set by the Court’s previous 

scheduling orders. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00227-OWW -GSA Document 34 Filed 01/24/08 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION FOR 60-DAY EXTENSION OF DATES IDENTIFIED IN PRIOR SCHEDULING ORDERS

- 3 - 

01360-101\00009110.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4. On the basis of the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request the Court to enter a new 

scheduling order setting the following calendar events: 

a. The Parties shall complete ADR no later than March 11, 2008. Defendants shall 

produce to Plaintiffs’ counsel a list of names and last known contact information of 

persons in the proposed class and shall provide Plaintiffs’ counsel access to the 

payroll and timekeeping records of same on or before February 22, 2008. 

b. If the case is not resolved by ADR on or before March 11, 2008, the Defendants 

shall respond to the Corrected Second Amended Complaint no later than March 21, 

2008. 

c. The scheduling conference presently calendared for February 22, 2008, shall be 

continued to April 3, 2008 at 8:15 AM, in courtroom 3. 

Respectfully submitted: 

SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: January 22, 2008 By: _/s/ David A. Dixon

_____ DAVID A. DIXON 

 DOWLING, AARON & KEELER, INC. 

 Attorneys and Counselors at Law 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 COAST VALLEY ROOFING dba COAST 

 ROOFING 

Dated: January 22, 2008 By: _______/s/ Stan Mallison______________________ 

 STAN MALLISON 

 MALLISON & MARTINEZ 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 ENRIQUEZ VASQUEZ & 

 JUAN ANDRES RUIZ 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 23, 2008 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER_____________________________ 

 Judge Wanger 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00227-OWW -GSA Document 34 Filed 01/24/08 Page 3 of 3