Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04167/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04167-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

-1- CASE NO. CV 04-04167 MMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, MILLER & BLAIR

MICHAEL BROWN Bar No. 106975

TATIA LIRA Bar No. 184741 

1676 N. California Blvd., Suite 200

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: (925) 937-3600

Facsimile: (925) 943-1106

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PITTSBURG PROPERTIES, LLC

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

BRUCE D. CELEBREZZE Bar No. 102181

DENNIS G. ROLSTAD Bar No. 150006

One Embarcadero Center, 16th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-3628

Telephone: (415) 781-7900

Facsimile: (415) 781-2635

Attorneys for Defendant

UNIGARD INDEMNITY COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Pittsburg Properties LLC and defendant Unigard Indemnity Company, by and 

through their counsel of record, hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows, and provide 

NOTICE to the Court that:

The parties have agreed to a settlement of this action through acceptance of the 

mediator’s proposal of mediator Michael Dickstein dated June 23, 2005 at 4:42 p.m. As more 

PITTSBURG PROPERTIES, a California 

Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNIGARD INDEMNITY COMPANY, a

Washington Corporation, and DOES 1-50,

inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CV 04-04167 MMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND

DISCOVERY

Case 3:04-cv-04167-MMC Document 27 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 2
-2- CASE NO. CV 04-04167 MMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

fully described in the mediator’s proposal, the parties will prepare a comprehensive written 

settlement agreement and release leading to the dismissal with prejudice of the action as to all 

parties.

The parties further STIPULATE AND AGREE to take all remaining pending depositions 

off calendar, to be resumed only if the settlement is not consummated. In the latter case, the 

parties STIPULATE AND AGREE that the only non-expert discovery to be taken is that

discovery noticed and/or propounded prior to June 24, 2005. The parties further agree that 

Unigard’s counsel will provide Pittsburg Properties with a draft of the written settlement

agreement on or before July 1, 2005, and the parties will expect to execute the written agreement, 

and dismiss this action, within 30 days thereafter.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

DATED: June 27, 2005 MORGAN, MILLER, BLAIR

By:s/Michael K. Brown

MICHAEL BROWN

TATIA LIRA

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PITTSBURG PROPERTIES

DATED: June 27, 2005 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

By:s/Dennis G. Rolstad

DENNIS G. ROLSTAD

Attorneys for Defendant

UNIGARD INDEMNITY COMPANY

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

June 27, 2005

Case 3:04-cv-04167-MMC Document 27 Filed 06/27/05 Page 2 of 2