Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04788/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04788-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

J

4

5

6

8

9

10

1 1

T2

1 3

t4

1 5

t6

17

1 8

1 9

20

2 L

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WALTER J. LACK (CA SBN 57ss0)

PAUL A. TRATNA (CA SBN 1ss805)

BRYAN C. PAYNE, (CA SBN 230966)

ENGSTROM, LIPSCOMB & LACK, P.C.

10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, 16th Floor

I-os Aneeles. CA 90067-4107

Telephdne: (r tol 552-3800

Facsimile: (310) 552-9434

ANDREW SHER (TX SBN 007899623) (pro hac vice to be requestefi

THE SHER LAW FIRM P.L.L.C.

3100 Timmons Lane, Suite 101

Houston, TX77027

Telephone: (713) 626-2100

Facsimile: (713)626-2101

ALEXANDER B. KLEIN, III (TX SBN 1155625) Qtro hac vice to be requested)

THE KLEIN LAW FIRM

2000 The Lyric Center

440 Louisiana

Houston, TX11002

Telephone: (713) 650-1111

Facsimile: (713)227-ll2l

Attomeys for Plaintiff

TRACY DeFATTA d/b/a BOOKKEEPING LTNLIMITED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACY DeFATTA d/b/a BOOKKEEPING

UNLIMITED, Individually and on behalf of

herself, and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

V ,

INTUIT INC., and DOES 1 through 100,

inclusive,

CASE NO. CO7 04788 RS

fSanta Clara Superior Court Case No. 107CV091687]

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSEDI ORDER

EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO

SERVE AND FILE HER OPPOSITION TO

MOTION TO REMAND, OR IN THE

ALTERNATIVE, PERMITTING PLAINTIFF

TO ENGAGE IN LIMITED

JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY

Date: December 14,2007

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Ctrm:4

Defendants.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Tracy DeFatta ("Plaintiff') filed a Motion to Rernand Case to State

Court on October 17,2007;

@PFDesktop\::ODMA/PCDOCS /ELLHMDMI2}5526I1 1

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S TO REPLY TO DEFENDAIIT'S OPPOSITION TO

MOTION TO REMAND

*E-FILED 11/27/97*

xxxxxxxxxxxx

Case 5:07-cv-04788-RS Document 21 Filed 11/27/07 Page 1 of 5
11,/26/2007 16:31 FAX

I

2

4

5

6

7

I

9

l 0

1 1

I.)

] L

l-J

t 4

1 5

I 6

t 7

1 8

1 9

z0

zl

22

z 3

24

25

26

27

28

@ otl:1,' oor

WHEREAS, this Motion is curently scheduled to be heard on December 14,2007;

WHEREAS, Defendant Intuit, Inc.'s ("Defendant") Opposition to the Motion to Remand

was due on Novemb er 21,20A7 ,and Plaintiff 's Reply is due on Novernb er 28, 200t7;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffseeks an extension of time until November 30,2007 to file her Reply

to Defendant' s Opposition;

WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred and Defendant has agreed that it will not be

prejudiced by said extension and are agreeable to extending the Reply date to November 30,2001

date;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS FIEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the patties, through

their respective counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff s Reply to Defendant's

Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to R.emand, or in the Alternative, Permitting Plaintiffto Engage in

Lirnited Jurisdictional Discoverv. is herebv extended to November 30.2007.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: November 26. 2407 ENGSTROM, LIPSCOMB & LACK

THE SHER LAW FIRM P.L,L.C.

THE KLEIN LAW FIRM

DATED: November 26, 2007

BRYAN C. PAYNE

ANDREW SHER

ALEXANDER B. KLEIN, III

Attorneys for Plaintiff

QUINN EMANUEL URQUFIART OLIVER &

HEDGES, LLP

@PFDesktopt : : ODMA-/PCDOCSi ELLHMDM,/295526i I

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO

MOTION TO REMAND

By

Case 5:07-cv-04788-RS Document 21 Filed 11/27/07 Page 2 of 5
1

2

J

4

5

6

8

9

10

1 1

t2

1 3

T4

15

T6

17

1 8

t 9

20

2 l

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO

ORDERED: Plaintiff shall have until November 30, 2007 to serve and file her Reply to

Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff s Motion to Remand.

DATED:

Richard Seeborg

United States Magistrate Judge

@PFDesktop\r:ODMA/PCDOCS/ELLHMDM|29552611

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S TO REPLY TO DEF'ENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO

MOTION TO REMAND

11/27/07

Case 5:07-cv-04788-RS Document 21 Filed 11/27/07 Page 3 of 5
1

2

5

6

7

10

1 1

12

t 3

I4

1 5

16

t7

1 8

L9

20

21

22

23

24

25

27

26

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

I am employed in the County of I-os Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of

18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard,

16th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067-4107. On November ','-- 

,2007,I served the

foregoing document described as STIPULATION AND [PROPOSEDI ORDER

EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO

REMAND, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO ENGAGE IN

LIMITED JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a

sealed envelope addressed as follows:

** SEE ATTACHED MAILING LIST **

(BY MAIL) I deposited such envelope in the mail at Los Angeles, California. The

envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am "readily familiar" with the firm's

practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with U.S. Postal

Service on that same date in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party

served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than

one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

(BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused such envelope to be delivered by hand to the

offices of the addressee(s).

X (BY ELECTRONIC TRANSFER) I caused all of the pages of the above-entitled

documents (PDF copy) to be transmitted to the recipients noted on the attached mailing list via

electronic transfer (EMAIL). This document was transmitted by electronic transmission and

reported without error 

"

_ (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS) I caused such envelope to be delivered to Federal Express for

overnight courier service to the offices of the addressee(s).

STATE: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that

the above is true and correct.

X FEDERAL: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this

coufi at whose direction the service was made.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the

foregoing is true and correct. Executed on November t'_,2007 at Los Angeles, California.

MERLENE FLETCHER

@PFDesktop\ : : ODMA/PCDOCS IELLIIMDM/2955261 |

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S TO REPLY TO DEFENDAIIT'S OPPOSITION TO

MOTION TO REMAND

)

)ss.

)

Case 5:07-cv-04788-RS Document 21 Filed 11/27/07 Page 4 of 5
I

2

3

4

5

6

I

8

9

10

1 1

t2

1 3

I 4

15

t 6

T7

1 8

L 9

20

2 1

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SERVICE LIST

DeFatta v. Intuit, Inc., et al.

USDC, Northern District Case No. C07 04788 RS

[Santa Clara County Superior Court - Old Courthouse - Case No. 107CV091687]

.A,ttorney Phone/Fax Faity

Claude M. Stern, Esq.

Evette D. Perurlpacker, Esq.

Sayuri K. Sharper, Esq.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560

Redwood Shores, CA94065

PH: (650) 801-5000

FX: (650) 801-5100

claudestern@quimemanuel. com

evettepennvDacker@quinnemanuel. ooin

sayurisharDer@quinnemanuel. com

Attorneys for Defendant.

INTUIT INC.

Andrew Sher, Esq.

THE SHER LAW FIRM PLLC

3100 Timmons Lane, Suite i01

Houston, TX77027

PH: (713) 626-2100

FX: (713) 626-2101

andrew(d)sher-law. con-r

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff,

TRACY DeFATTA

Alexander B. Klein, III, Esq.

THE KLEIN LAW FIRM

2000 The Lyric Center

440 Louisiana

Houston, TX77002

PH: (713) 650-l I l1

FX: (713) 227-1121

alex@thekleinlawfi nn.corr

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff.

TRACY DeFATTA

@PFDesktop\::ODMA/PCDOCS/ELLHMDM/295526/1 5

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTItr'F'S TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO

MOTION TO REMAND

Case 5:07-cv-04788-RS Document 21 Filed 11/27/07 Page 5 of 5