Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-00398/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-00398-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:1383 Review of HHS Decision

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 10cv398

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KASSANDRA OLIVER,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 10 CV 398 MMA (POR)

vs. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE;

[Doc. No. 13]

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

[Doc. No. 8]

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

On February 19, 2010, Plaintiff Kassandra Oliver filed this appeal of the final judgment of

the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for Supplemental Security Income under

Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C §§ 1381, et seq. [Doc. No. 1.] The matter was

referred to the Honorable Louisa S. Porter, United States Magistrate Judge, for report and

recommendation pursuant to section 636(b)(1)(B) of title 28 of the United States Code and Civil

Local Rule 72.1. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); S.D. Cal. Civ. R. 72.1. On May 25, 2010,

Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s civil action as untimely. [Doc. No. 8.] Plaintiff failed to

oppose Defendant’s motion. 

/ / /

Case 3:10-cv-00398-MMA-POR Document 14 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 10cv398

On March 28, 2011, Judge Porter filed a thorough and well-reasoned Report containing

findings and conclusions, upon which she bases her recommendation that the Court grant

Defendant’s motion to dismiss, with leave to amend. [Doc. No. 13.]

Neither party objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing objections

has expired. 

The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties including the exhibits

to Defendant’s motion to dismiss, and has made a review and determination in accordance with the

requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law. Accordingly, good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13] is ADOPTED in its entirety; 

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 8] is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s complaint

is dismissed without prejudice. 

3. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close the case file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 7, 2011

Hon. Michael M. Anello

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-00398-MMA-POR Document 14 Filed 07/07/11 Page 2 of 2