Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05783/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05783-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHINEHAS LAMONT PARKER, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

MIKE KNOWLES, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:04-cv-05783-OWW-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 38)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On September 14, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

a Recommendation that the instant Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus be DENIED, and the Clerk of Court be directed to enter

judgment in favor of Respondent. These Findings and Recommendation

were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections

were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service

of that order. On October 11, 2007, Petitioner filed a motion to

extend time. On October 24, 2007, the court granted Petitioner an

additional thirty (30) days within which to respond. On December

10, 2007, and December 14, 2007, Petitioner filed objections to the

Findings and Recommendation. 

Case 1:04-cv-05783-OWW -SMS Document 44 Filed 12/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendation are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed September 14,

2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED;

and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 27, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05783-OWW -SMS Document 44 Filed 12/28/07 Page 2 of 2