Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00275/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00275-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANSE SULLIVAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KRAMER, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:13cv00275 DLB PC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AS 

UNNECESSARY

(Document 12) 

Plaintiff Manse Sullivan (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed this action on February 22, 2013.1

On September 20, 2013, the Court screened the complaint with leave to amend. In the 

screening order, the Court noted that Plaintiff referenced a number of exhibits, though no 

exhibits were attached to the complaint.

On December 13, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for “Reconsideration of the Civil 

Complaint De Novo With Second Set of Attached Exhibits.” Also on December 13, 2013, 

Plaintiff his First Amended Complaint.2

 

1

Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on March 11, 2013.

2

 The First Amended Complaint is a copy of the body of the original complaint, with approximately 80 pages of 

exhibits attached.

Case 1:13-cv-00275-GSA Document 13 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court is required to screen all complaints pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Therefore, 

the Court will automatically screen the First Amended Complaint, and a request to do so is not 

necessary. The Court will issue a separate screening order. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED as unnecessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 23, 2014 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00275-GSA Document 13 Filed 04/23/14 Page 2 of 2