Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00854/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00854-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Frances Gilbert, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Maricopa County Superior Court, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-0854-PHX-FJM

ORDER

This action was filed on April 26, 2007, and an amended complaint on November 14,

2007, against the Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County and nine individual

defendants. The action was reassigned to us on February 20, 2008. The complaint alleges

employment discrimination but does not invoke any specific rights. The court has before it

defendants’ partial motion to dismiss and partial motion for more definite statement (doc. 9),

filed November 14, 2007. Defendants move to dismiss all claims against the individual

defendants and all claims against the State, except for any Title VII sex discrimination claim,

for which they request a more definite statement. Plaintiff has failed to respond.

Under LRCiv. 7.2(c), plaintiff had ten days to respond to the motion. Obviously, that

deadline has been egregiously ignored. Under LRCiv 7.2(i), non-compliance with the Local

Rules “may be deemed a consent to the denial or granting of the motion and the Court may

dispose of the motion summarily.” 

Case 2:07-cv-00854-FJM Document 15 Filed 05/09/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING defendant’s partial motion

to dismiss and partial motion for more definite statement (doc. 9). Plaintiff shall have ten

days from the date of this order to file a more definite statement of any Title VII sex

discrimination claim against the State. Rule 12(e), Fed. R. Civ. P. If a more definite

statement is not timely filed, the clerk is directed to enter final judgment without further

order from this court.

DATED this 8th day of May, 2008.

 

Case 2:07-cv-00854-FJM Document 15 Filed 05/09/08 Page 2 of 2