Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00309/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00309-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED—No. C-07-309 RMW

TER

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 4/22/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

S.C. WANG,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF MORGAN HILL,

Defendant.

No. C-07-309 RMW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

Plaintiff filed this action on January 17, 2007 and filed an application for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis. The court denied the application on April 23, 2007 and directed plaintiff to pay the

filing fee no later than May 18, 2007. Since then, however, plaintiff has not paid the filing fee

despite the court' order to do so, and has not served defendant. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby

ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Plaintiff shall file his response on or

before May 7, 2010. A show cause hearing shall be held on Friday, May 14, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. 

Failure to comply with this order shall result in this action being dismissed.

DATED: 4/22/10

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:07-cv-00309-RMW Document 11 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED—No. C-07-309 RMW

TER 2

Notice of this document has been sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

S.C. Wang

DVH 740/07011218

P.O. Box 361870

Milpitas, CA 95036

Counsel for Defendants:

No appearance

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 4/22/10 TER

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:07-cv-00309-RMW Document 11 Filed 04/22/10 Page 2 of 2