Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00846/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00846-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ALLSTATE CASUALTY INS. CO.,

Plaintiff,

v.

WENDELL ANDERSON, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 06-0846 PVT

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON

DEFENDANT ANDERSON’S MOTION

TO DISMISS AND CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

On June 14, 2006, the parties filed a Joint Case Management Conference Statement, and

Defendant Anderson filed a request to continue the Case Management Conference in order to allow

him time to obtain substitute counsel.1 Plaintiff filed a reply to the request. Based on the foregoing,

the file herein and the court’s own scheduling needs,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Defendant Anderson’s Motion to Dismiss is

continued to 10:00 a.m. on August 1, 2006. Although Defendant did not request a continuance of

this motion, the court is continuing the hearing sua sponte in light of its own scheduling needs. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Case Management Conference is continued to

2:00 p.m. on September 12, 2006. The parties shall file an updated Joint Case Management

Case 5:06-cv-00846-PVT Document 22 Filed 06/14/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

Conference Statement no later than September 5, 2006.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that nothing in this order shall be considered a stay of this

action, but this order is without prejudice to a motion to stay by any party who believes such a stay is

warranted.

Dated: 6/14/06

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:06-cv-00846-PVT Document 22 Filed 06/14/06 Page 2 of 2