Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-01871/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-01871-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983pr Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

15cv1871-LAB (BLM)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY ROBERTS,

Plaintiff,

v.

S. HENSLEY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 15cv1871-LAB (BLM)

KLINGELE NOTICE AND SCHEDULING 

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT MOTION

On July 27, 2017, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 61. The 

following notice is required pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en 

banc), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1035 (1999) and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 

1998), for all parties proceeding pro se.

NOTICE

Defendants in this case have moved the Court to enter judgment for the reasons stated 

in their summary judgment motion. ECF No. 61. The Court will consider the motion after giving 

you notice and opportunity to be heard. A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case.

Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure tells you what you must do in order to 

oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when 

there is no genuine issue of material fact – that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that 

would affect the result of your case – and where the party who asked for summary judgment is 

entitled to judgment as a matter of law. When a party you are suing seeks summary judgment 

and their position is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot 

simply reply by restating what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in 

Case 3:15-cv-01871-LAB-BLM Document 62 Filed 07/27/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

15cv1871-LAB (BLM)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents that 

contradict the facts shown in the Defendants’ declarations and documents and show that there 

is a genuine issue of material fact requiring trial. If you do not submit your own evidence in 

opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary 

judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file briefs and supporting papers and evidence 

as follows:

1. Plaintiff may file and serve his opposition, including any evidence, to the matters 

raised by Defendants’ summary judgment motion [ECF No. 61] by September 11, 2017. If 

you do not wish to oppose Defendants’ motion, you should file and serve a “Notice of NonOpposition” by that same date to let the Court know that Defendants’ motion is unopposed.

2. If you do file and serve an opposition, Defendants must file and serve their reply 

to your opposition by September 25, 2017.

3. A hearing is set for October 2, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3A. Upon 

completion of the briefing, the Court will take the matter under submission pursuant to Civil 

Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) and no personal appearances on the October 2, 2017 hearing date should 

be made. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 7/27/2017

Case 3:15-cv-01871-LAB-BLM Document 62 Filed 07/27/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2