Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00351/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00351-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned,

plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his

current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the

record address of the party is fully effective.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROMAN DEL ANGEL-POSADAS, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0351 RRB EFB P

vs.

UNKNOWN,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On April 9, 2007, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. The

order explained the complaint’s deficiencies and gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended

complaint correcting those deficiencies.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the order.1

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110. 

////

Case 2:07-cv-00351-JKS-EFB Document 7 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: June 27, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-00351-JKS-EFB Document 7 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 2