Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_04-cv-05250/USCOURTS-arwd-5_04-cv-05250-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION 

LEO A. DALY COMPANY PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 04-5250

HSG HOLDINGS, LLC DEFENDANT

J U D G M E N T

On the 15th day of August 2005, this matter came on for trial

to a duly selected jury consisting of eight members. On August

19, 2005, Plaintiff’s case was submitted to the jury as against

Defendant HSG Holdings, LLC; and, Defendant’s counterclaim was

submitted to the jury as against Plaintiff / Counter Defendant Leo

A. Daly Company. A unanimous decision was reached as to the

following interrogatories:

VERDICT FORM

I. TOWERS PROJECT

INTERROGATORY NO. 1

Do you find that a contract on the Towers project existed

between Plaintiff Leo A. Daly Company (hereinafter “Daly”) and

Defendant HSG Holdings, LLC (hereinafter “HSG”)?

Yes X 

No 

Case 5:04-cv-05250-JLH Document 41 Filed 08/29/05 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: <pageID>
2

NOTE: Complete Interrogatory No. 2 only if you answered “yes”

to Interrogatory No. 1. If you answered “no” to

Interrogatory No. 1, skip Interrogatories No. 2-5 and

answer Interrogatory No. 6. 

INTERROGATORY NO. 2

With respect to the Towers project, do you find that Daly

should recover under its breach of contract claim?

Yes 

No X 

NOTE: Complete Interrogatory No. 3 only if you answered “yes”

to Interrogatory No. 2. If you answered “no” to

Interrogatory No. 2, skip Interrogatory No. 3 and answer

Interrogatory No. 4. 

INTERROGATORY NO. 3

Please state the amount of any damages which you find from

the preponderance of the evidence were sustained by Daly as a

result of HSG’s breach of the Towers contract: 

$ 

NOTE: If you enter an amount in Interrogatory No. 3, skip

Interrogatories No. 4-7 and answer Interrogatory No. 8.

INTERROGATORY NO. 4

With respect to the Towers project, do you find that HSG

should recover under its breach of contract claim?

Yes X 

No 

NOTE: Complete Interrogatory No. 5 only if you answered “yes”

to Interrogatory No. 4. If you answered “no” to

Interrogatory No. 4, skip Interrogatory No. 5-7 and

answer Interrogatory No. 8. 

Case 5:04-cv-05250-JLH Document 41 Filed 08/29/05 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: <pageID>
3

INTERROGATORY NO. 5

Please state the amount of any damages which you find from

the preponderance of the evidence were sustained by HSG as a

result of Daly’s breach of the Towers contract: 

$ 25,001 

NOTE: If you enter an amount in Interrogatory No. 5, skip

Interrogatories No. 6 and 7 and answer Interrogatory No.

8. 

INTERROGATORY NO. 6 ** Note: Complete Interrogatory No. 6 ONLY

if you answered “no” to Interrogatory No. 1. **

With respect to the Towers project, do you find that Daly is

entitled to recover against HSG under the theory of quantum

meruit? 

Yes 

No 

NOTE: Complete Interrogatory No. 7 only if you answered “yes”

to Interrogatory No. 6. If you answered “no” to

Interrogatory No. 6, skip Interrogatory No. 7 and answer

Interrogatory No. 8. 

INTERROGATORY NO. 7

With respect to the Towers project, please state the amount

you find from the preponderance of the evidence Daly is entitled

to recover from HSG under the theory of quantum meruit: 

$ 

Case 5:04-cv-05250-JLH Document 41 Filed 08/29/05 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: <pageID>
4

II. LIFESTYLE RETAIL CENTER PROJECT

INTERROGATORY NO. 8

Do you find that a contract on the Lifestyle Retail Center

project existed between Plaintiff Leo A. Daly Company (hereinafter

“Daly”) and Defendant HSG Holdings, LLC (hereinafter “HSG”)?

Yes X 

No 

NOTE: Complete Interrogatory No. 9 only if you answered “yes”

to Interrogatory No. 8. If you answered “no” to

Interrogatory No. 8, skip Interrogatories No. 9-12 and

answer Interrogatory No. 13. 

INTERROGATORY NO. 9

With respect to the Lifestyle Retail Center project, do you

find that Daly should recover under its breach of contract claim?

Yes _______

No X 

NOTE: Complete Interrogatory No. 10 only if you answered “yes”

to Interrogatory No. 9. If you answered “no” to

Interrogatory No. 9, skip Interrogatory No. 10 and

answer Interrogatory No. 11. 

INTERROGATORY NO. 10

Please state the amount of any damages which you find from

the preponderance of the evidence were sustained by Daly as a

result of HSG’s breach of the Lifestyle Retail Center contract:

$ 

Case 5:04-cv-05250-JLH Document 41 Filed 08/29/05 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: <pageID>
5

NOTE: If you enter an amount in Interrogatory No. 10, do not

answer any more Interrogatories, since your work will be

complete. You should have your Foreperson sign and date

the verdict form and return to the courtroom with your

answer to the above Interrogatories. 

INTERROGATORY NO. 11

With respect to the Lifestyle Retail Center project, do you

find that HSG should recover under its breach of contract claim?

Yes X 

No 

NOTE: Complete Interrogatory No. 12 only if you answered “yes”

to Interrogatory No. 11. If you answered “no” to

Interrogatory No. 11, skip Interrogatory No. 12 and

answer Interrogatory No. 13. 

INTERROGATORY NO. 12

Please state the amount of any damages which you find from

the preponderance of the evidence were sustained by HSG as a

result of Daly’s breach of the Lifestyle Retail Center contract:

$ 52,462.00 

NOTE: If you enter an amount in Interrogatory No. 12, do not

answer any more Interrogatories, since your work will be

complete. You should have your Foreperson sign and date

the verdict form and return to the courtroom with your

answer to the above Interrogatories. 

Case 5:04-cv-05250-JLH Document 41 Filed 08/29/05 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: <pageID>
6

INTERROGATORY NO. 13 ** Note: Complete Interrogatory No. 13 ONLY

if you answered “no” to Interrogatory No. 8 ** 

With respect to the Lifestyle Retail Center project, do you

find that Daly is entitled to recover against HSG under the theory

of quantum meruit? 

Yes 

No 

NOTE: Complete Interrogatory No. 14 only if you answered “yes”

to Interrogatory No. 13. If you answered “no” to

Interrogatory No. 13, do not answer any more

Interrogatories, since your work will be complete. You

should have your Foreperson sign and date the verdict

form and return to the courtroom with your answer to the

above Interrogatories. 

INTERROGATORY NO. 14

With respect to the Lifestyle Retail Center project, please

state the amount you find from the preponderance of the evidence

Daly is entitled to recover from HSG under the theory of quantum

meruit: 

$ 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, in accordance

with the foregoing answers to such interrogatories, verdict shall

be entered as follows:

* judgment shall be entered for defendant, HSG Holdings,

LLC, and against plaintiff, Leo A. Daly Company, on the latter’s

complaint; plaintiff shall take nothing thereon; and the said

complaint will be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice; and

Case 5:04-cv-05250-JLH Document 41 Filed 08/29/05 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: <pageID>
7

* judgment shall be entered for defendant, HSG Holdings,

LLC, and against plaintiff, Leo A. Daly Company, on the former’s

counterclaim and defendant shall thereon have judgment against

plaintiff in the sum of $77,463.00, plus interest at the judgment

rate of 3.88% per annum from the date hereof until paid, plus

costs expended.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of August 2005.

/s/ Jimm Larry Hendren

JIMM LARRY HENDREN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:04-cv-05250-JLH Document 41 Filed 08/29/05 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: <pageID>
8

Case 5:04-cv-05250-JLH Document 41 Filed 08/29/05 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: <pageID>