Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-02308/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-02308-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Maryland Casualty Company,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Angelo's Pizza and Gyros LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-14-02308-TUC-RM (BGM)

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Maryland Casualty Company’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment (Doc. 33). On October 2, 2015, Magistrate Judge Bruce G. 

Macdonald issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 45) recommending that this 

Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. No objections to the Report and 

Recommendation were filed. 

 A district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions” of a 

magistrate judge’s “report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which 

objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The advisory committee notes to Rule 

72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that, “[w]hen no timely objection is 

filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record 

in order to accept the recommendation” of a magistrate judge. See also Prior v. Ryan, 

2012 WL 1344286, at *1 (D. Ariz. Apr. 18, 2012) (reviewing for clear error unobjectedto portions of Report and Recommendation); Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 

739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court 

Case 4:14-cv-02308-RM-BGM Document 46 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.”). 

 The Court has reviewed Judge Macdonald’s Report and Recommendation, the 

parties’ briefs, and the record. The Court finds no error in Judge Macdonald’s Report 

and Recommendation. Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 45) is accepted 

and adopted. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

(Doc. 33) is granted. The insurance policy at issue does not provide coverage for the 

claims made in the underlying lawsuit, Pima County Superior Court case number C2013-3966, and Plaintiff Maryland Casualty Company is not obligated to defend or 

indemnify Defendants Angelo’s Pizza and Gyros, LLC; Christian Scott Burton; Danny 

Walsh; and Danny Walsh Enterprises, LLC in relation to that underlying lawsuit. 

 Dated this 4th day of January, 2016. 

Honorable Rosemary Márquez

United States District Judge

Case 4:14-cv-02308-RM-BGM Document 46 Filed 01/04/16 Page 2 of 2