Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-04879/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-04879-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Albert Nguyen-Phouc,

Plaintiff,

 v.

Aramark Corporation,

Defendant. /

NO. C 09-04879 JW 

SCHEDULING ORDER

This case is scheduled for a Case Management Conference on April 26, 2010. Pursuant to

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules of this Court, the parties conferred and duly

submitted a Joint Case Management Statement and Proposed Order. (See Docket Item No. # 17.) 

Based on their joint submission, it appears that a schedule for the case can be set without the

necessity of an appearance at this time. Accordingly, the Case Management Conference is

VACATED and the parties are ordered to comply with the following schedule:

CASE SCHEDULE

Close of All Discovery (¶ 9) November 19, 2010

Last Date for Hearing Dispositive Motions (¶ 10)

(.60 days after the Close of All Discovery)

January 24, 2011

Preliminary Pretrial Conference at 11 a.m. (¶ 12)

(.30 days before the Close of All Discovery)

October 18, 2010

Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statements (¶ 11) 

(Due 10 days before conference)

October 8, 2010

 On May 21, 2010, evaluator Harry Bremond filed a Certification of ENE and notified the Court 

that the above-entitled matter has reached a settlement. (See Docket Item No. 19.) In light of the 

settlement, the Court vacates all trial and pretrial dates. On or before June 18, 2010, the parties shall 

file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). 

 If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, all parties shall appear in Courtroom No. 8, 4th 

Floor, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, Ca on June 28, 2010 at 9 a.m. 

and to show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

On or before June 18, 2010, the parties shall file a joint statement in response to the Order to Show 

Cause. The joint statement shall set forth the status of the activities of the parties for finalizing the 

settlement and how much additional time is requested to finalize and file the dismissal. If a voluntary 

dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated. 

 Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss this 

action. 

Dated: May 28, 2010 ___________________________ 

 JAMES WARE 

 United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

SETTLEMENT

Case 5:09-cv-04879-JW Document 20 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 5

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Kathryn M. Dancisak kdancisak@morganlewis.com

Melinda S. Riechert mriechert@morganlewis.com

Steven Paul Cohn spcohnlaw@aol.com

Dated: April 21, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: /s/ JW Chambers 

Elizabeth Garcia

Courtroom Deputy

May 28, 2010

Case 5:09-cv-04879-JW Document 20 Filed 05/28/10 Page 2 of 2