Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05597/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05597-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Copyright Infringement

---

Stipulated Motion and (Proposed) 

Modifying Order on TRO Application 1 C06 05597 CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Irwin B. Schwartz (SBN 141140) 

John V. Komar (SBN 169662) 

Petrie Schwartz LLP 

2033 Gateway Place, Suite 500 

San Jose, California 95110 

Telephone: 408-947-9099 

Facsimile: 408-947-9001 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

D. Peter Harvey (SBN 55712) 

Seth I. Appel (SBN 233421) 

Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: 415.354.0100 

Facsimile: 415.391.7124 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RIVERDEEP INTERACTIVE LEARNING, 

LTD., an Irish Company; RIVERDEEP, 

INC., a Delaware Limited Liability 

Company, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

MPS MULTIMEDIA, INC., a California 

Corporation; EDGAR CHEN an individual; 

SELECTSOFT PUBLISHING, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

Case No.: C06 05597 CW 

ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATED MOTION MODIFYING 

SCHEDULING ORDER ON 

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING 

ORDER APPLICATION 

Riverdeep Interactive Learning, Ltd. and Riverdeep, Inc. (together “Plaintiffs”) and MPS 

Multimedia, Inc., Edgar Chen and Selectsoft Publishing (together “Defendants”) hereby stipulate 

Case 4:06-cv-05597-CW Document 32 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
Stipulated Motion and (Proposed) 

Modifying Order on TRO Application 2 C06 05597 CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

and propose the following modification to the briefing schedule on Plaintiffs' application for 

temporary restraining order: 

(1) Plaintiffs’ reply to the Opposition shall be filed via ECF on or before October 4, 2006. 

The reason for the proposed modification is twofold. First, due to technical difficulties, 

Plaintiff’s counsel did not receive a complete copy of Defendants’ opposition to the application 

for a temporary restraining order until Monday, October 2, 2006. Second, the wife of Plaintiff’s 

lead counsel became a father for the first time on the evening of October 1, 2006, and will 

therefore need additional time to prepare the reply brief. 

 

 

PETRIE SCHWARTZ LLP HARVEY SISKIND LLP 

 

________/s/___________________ ________/s/___________________ 

Irwin B. Schwartz D. Peter Harvey 

John V. Komar Seth I. Appel 

 

 

Counsel for Plaintiffs Counsel for Defendants 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED. 

DATED: October 3, 2006 ____________________________ 

 ,U.S.D. J. 

Case 4:06-cv-05597-CW Document 32 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2