Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00892/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00892-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY ALBERT BAGGETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF MERCED, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:24-cv-00892-KES-BAM (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Doc. 8

Plaintiff Anthony Albert Baggett is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On August 5, 2024, the Court granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Doc. 6. The order granting plaintiff’s in forma pauperis motion was returned on August 13, 2024,

as “Undeliverable, Not at Facility.” More than sixty-three days passed, and plaintiff did not file a 

notice of change of address or otherwise communicate with the Court as required by Local 

Rule 183(b).

Accordingly, on October 31, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 

recommendations recommending dismissal of this action, without prejudice, for failure to 

prosecute. Doc. 8. The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained 

notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen days after service. Id. at 3. 

Plaintiff did not file any objections, and the deadline to do so has passed. To date, plaintiff has 

Case 1:24-cv-00892-KES-BAM Document 9 Filed 12/02/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

not otherwise communicated with the Court or updated his address.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de 

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court concludes that the findings 

and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on October 31, 2024, Doc. 8, are adopted in 

full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 29, 2024 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:24-cv-00892-KES-BAM Document 9 Filed 12/02/24 Page 2 of 2