Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-02149/USCOURTS-ca4-19-02149-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2149

CHARLES R. CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MS. HOLLIE S. BENNETT; DR. KAREN K. SHELTON; HONORABLE TONY 

M. JONES; MS. CATHERINE A. STONE; MR. CHARLTON B. HALL; MS. 

EMILY H. FARR; MR. DEAN GRIGG; MS. CHRISTA T. BELL; MR. DAVID B. 

LOVE; BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, South Carolina Dept. of 

Labor, Licensing, and Regulation; MS. SHIRLEY A. VICKERY; SOUTH 

CAROLINA BAR ASSOCIATION; SOUTH CAROLINA BAR BOARD OF 

GOVERNORS; MR. M. DAWES COOKE, JR.; MS. BEVERLY A. CARROLL; 

DR. J. PATRICK GOLDSMITH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:19-cv-00973-JFA)

Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020

Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles R. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2149 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/16/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles R. Campbell appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Campbell’s 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2018) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. Bennett, 

No. 0:19-cv-00973-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2149 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/16/2020 Pg: 2 of 2