Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06698/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06698-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: STATIC RANDOM ACCESS (SRAM)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

________________________________

This Order Relates to All Cases

Listed on Attachment A

 /

No. M 07-1819 CW

(MDL No. 1819)

ADMINISTRATIVE

ORDER

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“the Panel”)

has transferred to this Court for coordinated or consolidated

pretrial proceedings certain actions relating to an alleged

conspiracy to fix the price of Static Random Access Memory, which

is often referred to as “SRAM” (MDL 1819). The cases listed on

Attachment A were filed in the Northern District of California and

related to C-06-6491 CW, Dataplex, Inc. v. Alliance Semiconductor,

et al., the underlying case in MDL 1819. These actions involve

questions of fact that are common to the actions transferred under

28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California. The Clerk

in the Northern District of California has established M-07-1819

CW, In Re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation,

as the Master Docket for all SRAM litigation cases. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all cases listed on Attachment A

Case 4:06-cv-06698-CW Document 24 Filed 04/25/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

shall be included in Master Docket M-07-1819 CW, In re Static

Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation, for coordinated

or consolidated pretrial proceedings. All pleadings relating to

two or more actions shall be filed in the Master Docket. If a

pleading relates to a single action, the pleading shall be filed in

the individual action. For subsequent cases filed in the Northern

District of California, an Administrative Motion to Consider

Whether Cases Should Be Related shall be filed in C-06-6491 CW,

Dataplex, Inc. v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al. Upon the Court

relating the subsequent cases, they shall automatically be included

on the Master Docket.

4/25/07

Dated 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-06698-CW Document 24 Filed 04/25/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

ATTACHMENT A

4-06-6541 Madsen, et al. v. Samsung Electronics, et al.,

4-06-6542 Maites, et al. v. Samsung Electronics, et al.,

4-06-6652 Westell Technologies v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al.

4-06-6663 Takeda v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al.

4-06-6668 Juskiewicz v. Samsung Electronics, et al.

4-06-6698 Chip-Tech, Ltd. v. Cypress Semiconductor, et al.

4-06-6770 Ayers, et al. v. Samsung Electronics, et al.

4-06-7006 Thompson, et al. v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al.

4-06-7007 Stargate Films, Inc. v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al.

4-06-7194 Katz v. Samsung Electronics, et al.

4-06-7428 Markey v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al.

4-06-7637 Telular Corp. v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al.

4-06-7731 Reedy v. Cypress Semiconductor, et al.

4-06-7851 Autotime Corp. v. Samsung Electronics, et al.

4-06-7950 Greenwell, et al. v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al.

4-07-0228 Ralik v. Cypress Semiconductor, et al.

4-07-0509 Baranic v. Samsung Electronics, et al.

4-07-0916 Barnes v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al.

4-07-0918 Perez v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al.

4-07-0949 Koch v. Samsung Electronics, et al.

4-07-0950 Hochstein v. Samsung Electronics, et al.

4-07-0969 Kreitzer, et al. v. Cypress Semiconductor, et al.

4-07-0993 Salzman, et al. v. Cypress Semiconductor, et al.

4-07-1037 Berezin v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al.

Case 4:06-cv-06698-CW Document 24 Filed 04/25/07 Page 3 of 3