Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05038/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05038-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

Case No.13-cv-05038 NC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE 

CORPORATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR 

COMPANY, LTD.,

Defendant.

Case No.13-cv-05038 NC 

ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL

PRETRIAL INFORMATION

The Court notes that Enplas’ defense of inequitable conduct must be resolved by the 

Court, not by a jury. Thus, the parties should identify in their pretrial filings how they 

propose to schedule an evidentiary hearing on the equitable defense. Additionally, the 

parties should identify if there are any other claims or defenses in the case that require the 

Court to conduct the fact finding (as opposed to the jury). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 8, 2016 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-05038-NC Document 323 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 1