Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00768/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00768-39/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAKEITH MCCOY,

Plaintiff,

v.

HOLGUIN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00768-ADA-HBK (PC)

ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE, 

TELEPHONIC TRIAL CONFIRMATION 

HEARING AND RELATED DEADLINES1

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND 

PLAINTIFF A COPY OF LOCAL RULE 281

Plaintiff’s Pretrial Statement: December 11, 

2023

Defendants’ Pretrial Statement: January 11, 

2024

Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing: 

March 4, 2024 at 1:30 p.m.

Trial Date: May 7, 2024 at 8:30 AM

This matter proceeds on Plaintiff LaKeith McCoy’s Second Amended Complaint filed 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 15). The District Court previously granted summary 

judgment as to Defendants Holland, Kilmer, Santa Maria, and DeLuna, and denied summary 

judgment as to Defendants G. Arellano, E. Barron, O. Delgado, S. Lomas, Mayfield, Montanez, 

V. Moore, and Moreno. (Doc. Nos. 96, 215). Multiple attempts at settlement have been 

unsuccessful. (See Doc. Nos. 142, 174). The Court now sets a date for trial before Judge Ana de 

1 The Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing (“TTCH”) is also known as a pretrial conference. The 

TTCH will function as a pretrial conference for this action. See Local Rules 280, 282. 

Case 1:15-cv-00768-KES-HBK Document 218 Filed 09/29/23 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Alba to occur on May 7, 2024 at 8:30 a.m., and a telephonic trial confirmation hearing before

Judge de Alba to occur on March 4, 2024, at 1:30 p.m. This Order further directs the filing of 

pretrial statements and sets other related deadlines.

PRETRIAL STATEMENTS

1. The parties shall file Separate Statements. Local Rule 281(a)(1). The Statements shall 

contain the information set forth in Local Rule 281(b). 

2. Plaintiff shall file and serve his pretrial statement as described in this order on or 

before December 11, 2023. 

3. Defendants shall file and serve their pretrial statements as described in this order on or 

before January 11, 2024. 

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of Local Rule 281. 

TELEPHONIC TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING

1. A Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing is set for March 4, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. The 

location of the conference, including whether it will be held digitally or in person, will be 

communicated to the parties by Judge de Alba. If set digitally, the parties will be provided with

the Zoom ID and password by Judge de Alba’s Courtroom Deputy prior to the conference. The 

Zoom ID number and password are confidential and are not to be shared. Appropriate court attire 

is required. 

2. Counsel for Defendant is required to contact Plaintiff’s institution to arrange for 

Plaintiff’s participation at the TTCH as soon as the Court determines whether the conference will 

be remotely or in person.

ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES FOR TRIAL

1. At the trial of this case, Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each 

of the alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of 

trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) the testimony of witnesses. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to 

produce all the evidence to prove Plaintiff’s case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits 

or witness testimony. In addition to the matters already required to be addressed in the pretrial 

statement in accordance with Local Rule 281, Plaintiff must make a particularized showing to 

Case 1:15-cv-00768-KES-HBK Document 218 Filed 09/29/23 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

obtain the attendance of inmate-witnesses. The procedures and requirements for making such a 

detailed below. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with these procedures may result in the 

preclusion of any or all witnesses named in Plaintiff’s pretrial statement. To call witnesses to 

testify, Plaintiff must follow the procedures set forth below: 

Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to Voluntarily Testify

2. An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give testimony cannot 

come to court unless this Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the incarcerated 

witness to be transported to court. This Court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied 

that: (a) the prospective witness is willing to attend; and (b) the prospective witness has actual 

knowledge of relevant facts.

3. Either party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have 

agreed to voluntarily attend the trial must serve and file a written motion for a court order 

requiring that such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The motion must: (1) state 

the name, address, and prison identification number of each witness; and (2) be accompanied by 

declarations showing that each witness is willing to testify and that each witness has actual 

knowledge of relevant facts. The motion should be entitled “Motion for Attendance of 

Incarcerated Witnesses.”

4. The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways: (1) can 

swear personally by declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has 

information that the witness is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed. In the

declaration, the party must state when and where the prospective witness informed him of this 

willingness; or (2) the prospective witness can sign a declaration under penalty of perjury in 

which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify without being subpoenaed.

5. The prospective incarcerated witnesses’ actual knowledge of relevant facts can be 

shown in one of two ways: (1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective 

witness was an eyewitness or an ear-witness to the relevant facts, the party can swear by 

declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has actual knowledge (e.g., if an 

incident occurred in Plaintiff’s cell and, at the time, the party saw that a cellmate was present and 

Case 1:15-cv-00768-KES-HBK Document 218 Filed 09/29/23 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

observed the incident, the party may swear to the cellmate’s ability to testify); or (2) the inmatewitness can sign a declaration under penalty of perjury in which the inmate-witness describes

the relevant facts to which the prospective witness was an eye or ear witness. Whether the 

declaration is made by the party or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the 

incident, when and where it occurred, who was present, and how the prospective witness 

happened to be in a position to see or to hear what occurred at the time it occurred. The party 

must serve and file the declaration made the inmate-witness or by himself.

Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to Testify Voluntarily 

6. If a party wishes to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who refuse to 

testify voluntarily, the party should serve and file a written motion for a court order requiring that 

such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. Such motion should be in the form 

described above. In addition, the party must indicate in the motion that the incarcerated witnesses 

are not willing to testify voluntarily.

7. The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses, 

specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the Court will 

issue the writs necessary to cause the witnesses’ custodian to bring the witnesses to court. 

8. A motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, must be filed on or 

before December 11, 2023. An opposition(s), if any, must be filed on or before January 11, 

2024. 

Nonincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to Voluntarily Testify

9. It is the responsibility of either party who has secured a nonincarcerated witnesses’

voluntary attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial. No action need be sought 

or obtained from the Court.

Nonincarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to Testify Voluntarily

10. If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify 

voluntarily, the witness must be served with a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In addition, the 

party must tender an appropriate sum of money for the witness. Id. In the case of an 

nonincarcerated witness, the appropriate sum of money is the daily witness fee of $40.00 plus the 

Case 1:15-cv-00768-KES-HBK Document 218 Filed 09/29/23 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

witnesses’ travel expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 1821. 

11. If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of one or more nonincarcerated witnesses,

who refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must first notify the Court in writing of the name and 

location of each nonincarcerated witness. The Court will calculate the travel expense for each 

nonincarcerated witness and notify Plaintiff of the amount(s). Plaintiff then, for each witness, 

must submit a money order made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witnesses’

travel expenses plus the daily witness fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served upon the 

nonincarcerated witness by the United States Marshals Service unless the money order is tendered 

to the Court. Because no statute authorizes the use of public funds for these expenses in civil 

cases, the tendering of witness fees and travel expenses is required even if Plaintiff was granted 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to have the Marshals Service serve any 

nonincarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must submit the money 

orders to the Court no later than December 11, 2023. In order to ensure timely submission of the 

money orders, Plaintiff must notify the Court of the names and locations of his or her witnesses, 

in compliance with the instructions above, no later than December 11, 2023. 

CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE IS AVAILABLE

District Court Judges of the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California have 

among the heaviest caseloads in the nation. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated the 

backlog and as a result trial for a District Judge cannot occur until the date set above. The parties 

can consent to a United States Magistrate Judge conducting all proceedings, including trial and 

entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and 

Local Rule 305. The Eastern District Magistrate Judges, all experienced in trial, use the same 

jury pool and same court facilities as United States District Court Judges. Since Magistrate Judges 

do not conduct felony trials, they have greater flexibility and schedule firm trial dates. Judgment 

entered by a United States Magistrate Judge is appealable directly to the United States Court of 

Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. While there are scheduling benefits to consenting to Magistrate 

Judge jurisdiction, substantive rulings and decisions will not be affected by whether a party 

chooses to consent or not. The possibility of consenting may be addressed by the District Judge

Case 1:15-cv-00768-KES-HBK Document 218 Filed 09/29/23 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

at the TTCH.

EFFECT OF THIS ORDER

• Any party unable to comply with the dates outlined in this order shall immediately file an 

appropriate motion or stipulation identifying the requested modification(s).

• The dates set in this order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a 

showing of good cause, even if a stipulation to modify is filed. Due to the impacted 

nature of the civil case docket, this Court disfavors requests to modify established dates. 

• The parties are advised that failure to file amended pretrial statements as required by this 

Order or failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of appropriate 

sanctions, which may include dismissal of the action or entry of default.

Dated: September 29, 2023 

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00768-KES-HBK Document 218 Filed 09/29/23 Page 6 of 6