Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05446/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05446-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05446-JST JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

M

C

KOOL SMITH, P.C. 

AUSTIN, TX 

Jennifer P. Estremera, SBN 251076 

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 

255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510 

Redwood Shores, California 94065 

Tel: (650) 394-1414; Fax: (650) 394-1422 

jestremera@mckoolsmith.com

John B. Campbell, TX SBN 24036314 

(admitted Pro Hac Vice)

James E. Quigley, TX SBN 24075810 

(admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

Jennifer Van Dusen TX SBN 24087087 

(admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 

300 West 6th Street, Suite 1700 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Tel. (512) 692-8700; Fax: (512) 692-8744 

jcampbell@mckoolsmith.com 

jquigley@mckoolsmith.com 

jvandusen@mckoolsmith.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Eolas Technologies Incorporated 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 

 170151) 

 David A. Perlson (Cal. Bar No. 209502) 

 Michael D. Powell (Cal. Bar No. 202850) 

 Derek J. Tang (Cal. Bar No. 4540514) 

 Lindsay M. Cooper (Cal. Bar No. 287125) 

 Felipe Corredor (Cal. Bar No. 295692) 

 qe-eolas@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

(415) 875-6600 

(415) 875-6700 facsimile 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Google Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GOOGLE INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 3:15-cv-05446-JST 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

HEARING 

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

Case 4:15-cv-05446-JST Document 85 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -1- 

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05446-JST JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

M

C

KOOL SMITH, P.C. 

AUSTIN, TX 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Defendant Eolas Technologies Incorporated 

(“Eolas”) and Plaintiff Google Inc. (“Google”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby 

submit the following Joint Stipulation, as follows: 

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2015, Google served its complaint upon Eolas; 

WHEREAS, on December 4, 2015, this Court set the Case Management Conference for 

February 23, 2016; 

WHEREAS, on December 15, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for 

Eolas to answer or otherwise respond to Google’s complaint to January 21, 2016; 

WHEREAS, on January 5, 2016, this Court granted the parties’ stipulation; 

WHEREAS, on January 20, 2016, Google filed a first amended complaint; 

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2016, this Court reset the Case Management Conference for 

February 24, 2016; 

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2016, Eolas filed a motion to dismiss Google’s complaint, 

scheduled for hearing by this Court on April 21, 2016; 

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2016, Eolas filed an administrative motion for relief from the 

notice and order setting initial Case Management Conference, for continuance of the Case 

Management Conference, and to stay any discovery; 

WHEREAS, on February 17, 2016, this Court granted in part and denied in part Eolas’s 

administrative motion, resetting the Case Management Conference for April 21, 2016; 

WHEREAS, on February 22, 2016, the parties jointly moved the Court to extend the time for 

Google to file its opposition to Eolas’s Motion to Dismiss Google’s Complaint to March 4, 2016, 

and for Eolas to file its reply to Google’s opposition to March 14, 2016, and the Court granted the 

parties’ motion; 

WHEREAS, on March 7, 2016, the parties jointly moved the Court to extend the time for 

Eolas to file its reply to Google’s opposition to Eolas’s Motion to Dismiss Google’s Complaint to 

March 17, 2016, and the Court granted the parties’ motion; 

WHEREAS, on April 11, 2016, the parties jointly moved the Court to move the initial Case 

Management Conference, currently set for April 21, 2016, to May 26, 2016, but inadvertently 

Case 4:15-cv-05446-JST Document 85 Filed 01/03/17 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -2- 

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05446-JST JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

M

C

KOOL SMITH, P.C. 

AUSTIN, TX 

omitted an explicit request to move the hearing on Eolas’ Motion to Dismiss. The Court denied the 

parties’ motion without prejudice to refile to address the Motion to Dismiss hearing as well; 

WHEREAS, on April 14, 2016, the parties jointly moved the Court to move the initial Case 

Management Conference and the hearing on Eolas’s Motion to Dismiss to June 16, 2016, and the 

Court granted the parties’ motion; 

WHEREAS, on June 16, 2016, the Court granted Eolas’s Motion to Dismiss with 

modifications and ordered the parties to notify the Court upon receiving a ruling from the Texas 

Court on Google’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California in Eolas 

Technologies Incorporated v. Google Inc., Civil Action No. 6:15-cv-01039-RWS (E.D. Tex.) (the 

“Texas Case”); 

WHEREAS, on November 4, 2016, the parties jointly notified the Court that the Texas Court 

denied Google’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California in the Texas Case; 

WHEREAS, on November 7, 2016, the Court issued an order setting a Case Management 

Conference for January 18, 2017 on why the instant case should not be transferred to the Eastern 

District of Texas under the first-to-file rule. 

WHEREAS, on December 7, 2016, Google filed a petition for a writ of mandamus 

challenging the denial of Google’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California 

in the Texas Case; 

WHEREAS, Google’s mandamus petition, which is now fully briefed, remains pending; 

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed to request that the hearing currently set 

for January 18, 2017 be extended to March 1, 2017; 

WHEREAS, no other deadlines will be affected; 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND THE PARTIES JOINTLY 

REQUEST that the hearing date be extended to March 1, 2017. 

 

Case 4:15-cv-05446-JST Document 85 Filed 01/03/17 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -3- 

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05446-JST JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

M

C

KOOL SMITH, P.C. 

AUSTIN, TX 

DATED: December 30, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

 MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 

 By /s Jennifer Van Dusen 

 Jennifer Van Dusen 

Attorneys for Eolas Technologies Incorporated 

 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

 By /s David A. Perlson 

 David A. Perlson 

Attorneys for Google Inc. 

 

Case 4:15-cv-05446-JST Document 85 Filed 01/03/17 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -4- 

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05446-JST JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

M

C

KOOL SMITH, P.C. 

AUSTIN, TX 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

I, Jennifer Van Dusen, am the ECF user whose userid and password authorized the filing of 

this document. Under Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that David A. Perlson has concurred in this filing. 

DATED: December 30, 2016 /s/ Jennifer Van Dusen 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Defendant Eolas Technologies Incorporated and Plaintiff Google Inc. have stipulated to 

request an extension of the hearing scheduled for January 18, 2017 until March 1, 2017. 

The requested extension is GRANTED. The hearing scheduled for January 18, 2017 has 

been rescheduled to March 1, 2017. 

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ___________________, 2017 

Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

United States District Judge 

 

January 3

Case 4:15-cv-05446-JST Document 85 Filed 01/03/17 Page 5 of 5