Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-04980/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-04980-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RESCHEDULING ORDER 

CASE NUMBER: 14-cv-04980-SC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER 

 & GROSSMANN LLP 

BRETT M. MIDDLETON (Bar No. 199427) 

12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 

San Diego, California 92130 

Tel: (858) 793-0070 

Fax: (858) 293-0323 

brettm@blbglaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff International Union

of Operating Engineers Local 478 

[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF 

OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 478, 

Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant 

IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

LARRY HSU, G. FREDERICK 

WILKINSON, LESLIE Z. BENET, ROBERT 

L. BURR, ALLEN CHAO, NIGEL T. 

FLEMING, MICHAEL MARKBREITER, 

MICHAEL J. NESTOR, MARY K. 

PENDERGAST, BRYAN M. REASONS, 

and PETER R. TERRERI, 

Defendants.

Case No.: 14-cv-04980-SC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

RESCHEDULING ORDER 

SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION 

WHEREAS, on November 10, 2014, plaintiff International Union of Operating Engineers 

Local 478 (“Plaintiff” or “IUOE”) initiated this shareholder derivative action on behalf of 

nominal defendant Impax Laboratories, Inc. (“Impax”) and against defendants Larry Hsu, G. 

Case 4:14-cv-04980-HSG Document 30 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 3
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RESCHEDULING ORDER 

CASE NUMBER: 14-cv-04980-SC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Frederick Wilkinson, Leslie Z. Benet, Robert L. Burr, Allen Caho, Nigel T. Fleming, Michael 

Markbreiter, Michael J. Nestor, Mary K. Pendergast, Bryan M. Reasons, and Peter R. Terreri 

(collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel;

WHEREAS, on November 19, 2014, Plaintiff sent Defendants Waiver of the Service of 

Summons forms, which Defendants executed, and now Defendants response to the complaint is 

due on January 20, 2015; 

WHEREAS, on December 17, 2014, Plaintiff IUOE and plaintiff in Randall K. Wickey v. 

Larry Hsu, et al., No. 14-cv-04266-JD (“Wickey”) jointly filed an unopposed motion to 

consolidate the Wickey and IUOE actions, the hearing for which has been set by the Honorable 

Judge Donato for January 21, 2015, one day after Defendants’ currently scheduled response date 

to the complaint in this action (ECF No. 24); 

WHEREAS, on December 17, 2014, in light of the pending motion for consolidation, 

Judge Donato granted the parties’ stipulated request to vacate Defendants’ scheduled response 

date to the complaint in Wickey, and ordered the same schedule as proposed in this Stipulation, 

with Defendants’ motion to dismiss due either within 45 days of plaintiffs filing an amended 

consolidated complaint, or 30 days from the date Judge Donato denies the motion for 

consolidation (ECF Nos. 20, 23); 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that it would be a waste of judicial resources for 

Defendants to prepare and file a motion to dismiss prior to Judge Donato’s ruling on plaintiffs’ 

motion for consolidation; 

NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned parties, by and through their counsel of record, 

stipulate as follows: 

1. The current January 20, 2015 deadline for Defendants’ motion to dismiss is 

vacated. 

2. If Judge Donato grants plaintiffs’ motion for consolidation, Defendants shall file 

and serve their motion to dismiss within 45 days of plaintiffs filing a consolidated 

complaint. 

Case 4:14-cv-04980-HSG Document 30 Filed 01/05/15 Page 2 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] RESCHEDULING ORDER 

CASE NUMBER: 14-cv-04980-SC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. If the Court denies plaintiffs’ motion for consolidation, Defendants shall file and 

serve their motion to dismiss the complaint filed in this action within 30 days of 

such ruling. 

4. The Case Management Conference set for February 24, 2015, is vacated and shall 

be set for a future date following a ruling on Defendants’ motion to dismiss. 

DATED: December 23, 2014 

BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

 & GROSSMANN LLP 

By: /s/ Brett M. Middleton 

 Brett M. Middleton 

Brett M. Middleton (Bar No. 199427) 

12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 

San Diego, California 92130 

Telephone: (858) 793-0070 

Facsimile: (858) 293-0323 

brettm@blbglaw.com 

 -andDavid L. Wales (admitted pro hac vice)

Adam Hollander (admitted pro hac vice)

1285 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10019

Telephone: (212) 554-1409

Facsimile: (212) 554-4444 

davidw@blbglaw.com

adam.hollander@blbglaw.com 

Frank R. Schirripa 

HACH ROSE SCHIRRIPA & CHEVERIE LLP 

185 Madison Avenue 

New York, NY 10016 

Telephone: (212) 213-8311 

Facsimile: (212) 779-0028 

fschirripa@hrsclaw.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff International Union of 

Operating Engineers Local 478 

By: /s/ Peter A. Wald 

 Peter A. Wald 

Peter A. Wald (Bar No. 85705) 

Marcy C. Priedeman (Bar No. 258505) 

505 Montgomery St., Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 391-0600 

Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 

peter.wald@lw.com 

marcy.priedeman@lw.com 

 -andPatrick E. Gibbs (Bar No. 183174) 

140 Scott Drive 

Menlo Park, California 94025-1008 

Telephone: (650) 328-4600 

Facsimile: (650) 463-2600 

patrick.gibbs@lw.com

Counsel for Defendants Larry Hsu, G. 

Frederick Wilkinson, Leslie Z. Benet, Robert L. 

Burr, Allen Chao, Nigel T. Fleming, Michael 

Markbretier, Michael J. Nestor, Mary K. 

Pendergast, and Bryan M. Reasons 

and

Nominal Defendant Impax Laboratories, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

1/5/2015

Case 4:14-cv-04980-HSG Document 30 Filed 01/05/15 Page 3 of 3