Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02324/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02324-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL J. LAKE

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2324 GEB CMK P

vs.

OFFICER McKENZIE,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.

§1983. Petitioner did not request authority to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915,

nor did he submit the appropriate filing fee. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local

Rule 72-302 by the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

By order filed December 7, 2005, the court gave plaintiff an opportunity to submit

either an application to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff was

warned that failure to comply with the court’s December 7, 2005 order would result in a

recommendation that his complaint be dismissed without prejudice. To date, plaintiff has failed

to submit either a request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee.

///

///

Case 2:05-cv-02324-GEB-CMK Document 5 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Based on the foregoing, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice for failure to comply with court orders. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(b). 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 28, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-02324-GEB-CMK Document 5 Filed 02/28/06 Page 2 of 2