Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05895/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05895-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

Case No.3:07-cv-05895-WHA

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Matlock 

Law 

Group, 

PC. 

ANNE-LEITH MATLOCK 

MATLOCK LAW GROUP, 

A Professional Corporation 

1485 Treat Blvd., Suite 200 

Walnut Creek, CA 94597 

Phone: (925) 944-7131 

Fax: (925) 944-7138 

E-mail: anne-leith@matlocklawgroup.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

THE TONYTAIL COMPANY, INC. 

THOMAS F. FITZPATRICK 

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 

135 Commonwealth Drive 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: 650-752-3100 

Facsimile: 650-853-1038 

E-Mail: TFitzpatrick@goodwinprocter.com 

Attorneys For Defendants 

CONAIR CORPORATION and RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

THE TONYTAIL COMPANY, INC. 

a Delaware Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CONAIR, a Delaware Corporation; 

SCUNCI INTL., Ltd., a Delaware 

Corporation; RITE AID, a Delaware 

Corporation; L&N Sales & Marketing, 

Inc., and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 

 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:07-cv-05895-WHA 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING 

CLAIMS 4 AND 5 OF U.S. PATENT NO. 

6,263,884 

 

 

Case 3:07-cv-05895-WHA Document 99 Filed 09/10/08 Page 1 of 2
Case No.3:07-cv-05895-WHA

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Matlock 

Law 

Group, 

PC. 

THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by Plaintiff The Tonytail 

Company, Inc. and Defendants Conair Corporation and Rite Aid HDQTRS. Corp, 

pursuant to the stipulation executed by the parties and submitted to this Court, and for 

other good cause shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

(1) all of Plaintiff’s causes of action with respect to claims 4 and 5 of U.S. 

Patent No. 6,263,884, are hereby dismissed with prejudice; 

(2) Defendants’ counterclaim requesting a declaratory judgment of noninfringement with respect to claims 4 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,263,884 is 

dismissed with prejudice; 

(3) Defendants’ counterclaim requesting a declaratory judgment of invalidity 

with respect to claims 4 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,263,884 is dismissed without 

prejudice; and 

(4) neither party will assert a cause of action against the other (or any related 

entity, affiliate, assignee, or successor) based in whole or part on the 

infringement, non-infringement, or invalidity of claims 4 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 

6,263,884. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________ _______________________ 

 WILLIAM ALSUP 

 United States District Court Judge 

 Northern District of California 

 San Francisco Division 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

September 10, 2008.

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:07-cv-05895-WHA Document 99 Filed 09/10/08 Page 2 of 2