Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00328/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00328-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________

 Proposed Order Re: Modification of Scheduling Order 

James D. Weakley, Esq. Bar No. 082853

Erica M. Camarena, Esq. Bar No. 227981

THE LAW FIRM OF

WEAKLEY, RATLIFF,

ARENDT & McGUIRE, LLP

1630 East Shaw Avenue, Suite 176

Fresno, California 93710

Telephone: (559) 221-5256

Facsimile: (559) 221-5262

Attorneys for Defendants, J. CAPRIOLA, I. BARRIMOND, 

J. HOLLINS, R. PEREZ, A. SIMONSON; CITY OF FRESNO, R. GARRISON,

MARK A. YEE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ZELLA MAYE FREEMAN, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF FRESNO, R. GARRISON (F.P.D.

Badge No. 780), MARK A. YEE (F.P.D.

Bade No. 692), J. CAPRIOLA (F.S.O. Badge

No. 7622), I. BARRIMOND (F.S.O Badge

No. 1153), J. HOLLINS (F.S.O. Badge No.

2346), R. PEREZ (F.S.O. Badge No. 6169),

A. SIMONSON (F.S.O. Badge No. 9364),

inclusive, 

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-00328-OWW-SMS

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S EX

PARTE REQUEST TO MODIFY THE

SCHEDULING ORDER

On June 14, 2006, the Court heard the ex parte motion requesting a modification to the 

Scheduling Order to allow Plaintiff time to designate experts filed by Plaintiff, ZELLA MAYE

FREEMAN. Attorney Wesley E. Stupar appeared for the Plaintiff and Attorney Erica M.

Camarena appeared for the Defendants, JOHN CAPRIOLA, IAN BARRIMOND, JASON

HOLLINS, ROBERT PEREZ, ANDREW SIMONSON, ROBERT GARRISON, MARK A.

YEE , and the CITY OF FRESNO (hereinafter, collectively referred to as “Defendants”).

//

Case 1:05-cv-00328-OWW -SMS Document 43 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________

 Proposed Order Re: Modification of Scheduling Order 2

Upon due consideration of the arguments of the parties and the record herein, the Court

Orders the following:

1. Plaintiff is allowed to designate one Expert Witness on Police Practices and

Procedures. Such Expert Witness must be disclosed to Defendants with a report

by Friday, June 16, 2006. The parties are ordered to complete discovery of this

Expert no later than June 30, 2006. Plaintiff is not entitled to re-open discovery

with respect to those Expert Witnesses designated by Defendants. 

2. Plaintiff is allowed to designate Samuel L. Burklow, M.D., as a Medical Expert. 

Dr. Burklow’s designation and his report must be provided to Defendants on or

before June 23, 2006. Defendants must complete discovery of Dr. Burklow no

later than June 30, 2006. 

3. Defendants may supplement their Expert Designation to offer a counter Medical

Expert, but need not provide a report to Plaintiff, and such Expert shall not be

subjected to discovery. 

4. Plaintiff is ordered to pay all of Defendants’ costs incurred, Expert Witness fees,

and deposition costs associated with discovery related to Plaintiff’s belated

designation of experts. 

5. Plaintiff’s request for cell phone records made after the discovery cut-off date is

DENIED. 

6. The deadline date for filing all non-dispositive motions has been extended. The

parties must file all non-dispositive motions no later than June 30, 2006. 

7. The deadline date for filing all dispositive motions has been extended. The

parties must file all dispositive motions no later than July 30, 2006.

8. All other dates referred to in the Scheduling Conference Order will remain in full

effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00328-OWW -SMS Document 43 Filed 06/16/06 Page 2 of 2