Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04220/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04220-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

[Proposed] Order Granting Administrative Request to 

File Under Seal 

 n:\lit\li2006\060474\00391101.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Deputy 

PETER J. KEITH, State Bar #206482 

RONALD P. FLYNN, State Bar #184186 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN, State Bar # 241755

Deputy City Attorneys 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3901 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 

SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, 

SHERIFF MICHAEL HENNESSEY, AND 

DEPUTY MIGUEL PRADO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MACK WOODFOX, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO 

SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF 

MICHAEL HENNESSEY, AND 

DEPUTY MIGUEL PRADO, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C05-4220 VRW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

FILE UNDER SEAL MATERIALS 

RELATED TO DEFENDANTS 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF 

WOODFOX 

Date Action Filed: October 18, 2005 

Trial Date: None Set 

. 

Woodfox v. CCSF, et al. – USDC No. C05-4220 VRW

Case 3:05-cv-04220-VRW Document 29 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cv-04220-VRW Document 31 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 2
[Proposed] Order Granting Administrative Request to 

File Under Seal 

 n:\lit\li2006\060474\00391101.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] ORDER 

The administrative motion to file documents under seal is GRANTED. Defendants may file 

the following items under seal: 

(1) Portions of DEFENDANTS’ POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF 

THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF WOODFOX;

(2) The entirety of the DECLARATION OF LIEUTENANT ALLEN KENNEDY IN 

SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST 

PLAINTIFF WOODFOX, including the exhibits; and 

(3) Exhibit N of the DECLARATION OF JOE GOLDENSON, M.D., IN SUPPORT OF 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF 

WOODFOX.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ 

By:____________________________

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

United States District Judge 

Woodfox v. CCSF, et al. – USDC No. C05-4220 VRW

Case 3:05-cv-04220-VRW Document 29 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 2 of 2

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:05-cv-04220-VRW Document 31 Filed 08/17/06 Page 2 of 2