Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05352/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05352-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 12:22 Securities Fraud

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

CASE NO. C06-05352-JW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NINA F. LOCKER (Bar No. 123838) 

CAZ HASHEMI (Bar No. 210239) 

BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR (Bar No. 203244) 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 

Email: nlocker@wsgr.com 

Email: chashemi@wsgr.com 

Email: bnoor@wsgr.com 

Attorney for Defendants 

John C. East, Esmat Z. Hamdy, Paul V. Indaco, 

Fares N. Mubarak, Dennis G. Kish, 

Henry L. Perret, Douglas D. Goodyear 

Jeffrey M. Schlageter, David M. Sugishita, 

Dennis F. Nye, Carl N. Burrow, Robert J. Smith, 

Robert G. Spencer, Jon A. Anderson, 

David L. Van De Hey, Barbara McArthur, 

Suzanna Kinner, Michelle Begun, 

Anthony Farinaro, Jacob Jacobson and 

Nominal Defendant Actel Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IN RE ACTEL DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: C06-05352-JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO THE VERIFIED 

CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDER 

DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT 

Case 5:06-cv-05352-JW Document 42 Filed 09/13/07 Page 1 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] - 1 - 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

CASE NO. C06-05352-JW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, the present action is a purported shareholder derivative action against certain 

present and former officers and directors of Actel Corporation (“Actel”); 

WHEREAS, on January 8, 2007, this Court entered a briefing schedule setting the time for 

Plaintiffs to file their consolidated complaint and Defendants to file responsive pleadings; 

WHEREAS, on February 9, 2007, Plaintiffs filed their Verified Consolidated Shareholder 

Derivative Complaint; 

WHEREAS, any responses to the Verified Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint, 

including any motions to dismiss, are currently due September 20, 2007; 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and wish to further extend the time period 

for Defendants to file their response to the Verified Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint 

in order to continue settlement discussions; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, subject to 

approval of the Court, as follows: 

1. Defendants shall file and serve any responses to the Verified Consolidated 

Shareholder Derivative Complaint, including any motions to dismiss, on or before December 20, 

2007. 

DATED: September 12, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

 Professional Corporation 

 Nina F. Locker (Bar No. 123838) 

 Caz Hashemi (Bar No. 210239) 

 Bahram Seyedin-Noor (Bar No. 203244) 

 By:_ /s/ Bahram Seyedin-Noor 

 Bahram Seyedin-Noor 

 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 5:06-cv-05352-JW Document 42 Filed 09/13/07 Page 2 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] - 2 -

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

CASE NO. C06-05352-JW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DATED: September 12, 2007 SCHIFFRIN BARROWAY 

TOPAZ & KESSLER, LLP 

Alan R. Plutzik, Of Counsel (Bar No. 077785) 

Robert M. Bramson, Of Counsel (Bar No. 102006) 

L. Timothy Fisher, Of Counsel (Bar No. 191626) 

By: /s/ Alan R. Plutzik____________ 

 Alan R. Plutzik 

2125 Oak Grove Road, Suite 120 

Walnut Creek, CA 94598 

Telephone: (925) 945-0770 

Facsimile: (925) 945-8792 

 -and 

Lee D. Rudy 

Nichole Browning 

J. Daniel Albert 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

Telephone: (610) 667-7706 

Facsimile: (610) 667-7056 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs 

Case 5:06-cv-05352-JW Document 42 Filed 09/13/07 Page 3 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] - 3 -

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

CASE NO. C06-05352-JW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _____________________ ____________________________________ 

 Honorable James Ware 

 United Sates District Judge 

 Northern District of California 

September 12, 2007

Case 5:06-cv-05352-JW Document 42 Filed 09/13/07 Page 4 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] - 4 -

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

CASE NO. C06-05352-JW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

I, Bahram Seyedin-Noor, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being 

used to file the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to the Verified 

Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I 

hereby attest that Alan R. Plutzik has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: September 12, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Bahram Seyedin-Noor 

 Bahram Seyedin-Noor 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

John C. East, Esmat Z. Hamdy, Paul V. Indaco, 

Fares N. Mubarak, Dennis G. Kish, 

Henry L. Perret, Douglas D. Goodyear 

Jeffrey M. Schlageter, David M. Sugishita, 

Dennis F. Nye, Carl N. Burrow, Robert J. Smith, 

Robert G. Spencer, Jon A. Anderson, 

David L. Van De Hey, Barbara McArthur, 

Suzanna Kinner, Michelle Begun, 

Anthony Farinaro, Jacob Jacobson and 

Nominal Defendant Actel Corporation 

Case 5:06-cv-05352-JW Document 42 Filed 09/13/07 Page 5 of 5