Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01137/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01137-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JENNIFER MILLER, et al,

Plaintiffs,

v

WARREN E RUPF, et al,

Defendants.

 /

No C 07-01137 VRW

Related to C-02-02831

ORDER

At the December 10, 2009 hearing, the court ordered

plaintiffs to show cause not later than December 30, 2009 why their

claims should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Doc #131. 

In addition, plaintiffs were ordered to respond to defendants’

summary judgment motions not later than December 30, 2009. Id. 

At the December 10 hearing, the court warned plaintiffs

that failure to respond timely would result in dismissal of the

action pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Doc #131. Plaintiffs have failed

to file a response to the order to show cause or an opposition to

Case 3:07-cv-01137-VRW Document 133 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

defendants’ motions for summary judgment, and the deadline for

doing so has passed. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED pursuant

to FRCP 41(b). The clerk is directed to terminate all motions,

enter judgment in favor of defendants and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:07-cv-01137-VRW Document 133 Filed 01/04/10 Page 2 of 2