Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00815/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00815-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SID LANDAU,

Plaintiff,

v.

W. T. VOSS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00815-AWI-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

ALLEN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

(DOC. 96 & 106)

Plaintiff Sid Landau (“Plaintiff”) is a California civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 14, 2011, Defendant Wendy Allen filed a

motion for summary judgment. Doc. 96. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 9, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within twenty-one days. Doc. 106. No party filed a timely

Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

///

1

Case 1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB Document 108 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 9, 2011, is adopted in full;

2. Defendant Wendy Allen’s motion for summary judgment, filed April 14, 2011, is

granted; 

3. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendant Allen and against Plaintiff; and

4. Defendant Allen is dismissed from this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 6, 2012 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2

Case 1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB Document 108 Filed 01/06/12 Page 2 of 2