Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-01588/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-01588-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR APPEARANCE AT DEPOSITION AND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 

Case No.: CV 08-1588 SBA (BZ) (EDL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Douglas A. Applegate (SBN 142000) 

George M. Lee (SBN 172982) 

SEILER EPSTEIN ZIEGLER & APPLEGATE LLP 

101 Montgomery Street, 27th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Phone: (415) 979-0500 

Fax: (415) 979-0511 

Attorneys for Plaintiff William Giffen, 

successor-in-interest to Ivy Rosequist, 

individually and dba Wicker-Wicker-Wicker 

Robert P. Andris (SBN 130290) 

Lael D. Andara (SBN 215416) 

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 

1001 Marshall Street, Suite 300 

Redwood City, CA 94063-2052 

Phone: (650) 364-8200 

Fax: (650) 780-1701 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

Michael Taylor Designs, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WILLIAM GIFFEN, an individual and the 

successor-in-interest to IVY ROSEQUIST, 

individually and doing business as WICKERWICKER-WICKER 

 Plaintiff 

 vs. 

MICHAEL TAYLOR DESIGNS, INC., a 

California Corporation, 

 Defendant 

Case No.: CV 08-1588 SBA (BZ) (EDL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR APPEARANCE AT 

DEPOSITION AND FOR 

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 

MICHAEL TAYLOR DESIGNS, INC., a 

California corporation, 

 Counter-claimant 

 vs. 

WILLIAM GIFFEN, an individual and the 

successor-in-interest to IVY ROSEQUIST, 

individually and doing business as 

WICKER-WICKER-WICKER, 

 Counter-defendant 

Case 4:08-cv-01588-SBA Document 67 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 3 Case4:08-cv-01588-SBA Document66 Filed01/27/10 Page1 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR APPEARANCE AT DEPOSITION AND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 

Case No.: CV 08-1588 SBA (BZ) (EDL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff William Giffen, as substituted party plaintiff and counter-defendant (“Giffen”) 

and defendant and counter-complainant, Michael Taylor Designs, Inc. (“MTD”), by and through 

their respective counsel of record, agree: (a) that William Giffen will appear for deposition on a 

date mutually convenient to the parties but no later than February 19, 2010; and (b) that William 

Giffen will produce on or before February 12, 2010 all documents and electronically stored 

information that are in his possession, custody or control and that are responsive to MTD’s 

November 18, 2009 Request for Production. 

The parties further agree that any failure by Giffen to honor this stipulation shall be 

deemed to be the equivalent of a failure to abide by a discovery order and may result in sanctions 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(f) and the provisions of Judge Elizabeth D. 

Laporte’s January 6, 2010 Order Re Discovery Procedures and Setting Motion Hearing. 

Giffen having acknowledged the obligation to provide the requested discovery, the 

parties further agree that the motions to compel presently set for hearing on February 2, 2010 

shall be taken off calendar. Giffen’s counsel will both file this stipulation and deliver by 

messenger a courtesy copy of this stipulation to Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. 

SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: January 27, 2010 SEILER EPSTEIN ZIEGLER & APPLEGATE LLP 

By: /s/ Douglas A. Applegate 

Douglas A. Applegate, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

Ivy Rosequist, individually and doing business as 

Wicker-Wicker-Wicker 

Dated: January 27, 2010 ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

By: /s/ Lael D. Andara 

Lael D. Andara, Esq. 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

Michael Taylor Designs, Inc. 

Case 4:08-cv-01588-SBA Document 67 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 3 Case4:08-cv-01588-SBA Document66 Filed01/27/10 Page2 of 3
3

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR APPEARANCE AT DEPOSITION AND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 

Case No.: CV 08-1588 SBA (BZ) (EDL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________________ 

JUDGE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

Case4:08-cv-01588-SBA Document66 Filed01/27/10 Page3 of 3

February 1, 2010

Case 4:08-cv-01588-SBA Document 67 Filed 02/01/10 Page 3 of 3