Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01600/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01600-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:1801 Farmworker Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

K:\SMS\To_Be_Signed\05CV01600.o.Valenzuela.ex parte applica.wpd

Joseph E. Herman, Esq. (SBN 58899)

Law Office of Joseph E. Herman

114 S. Rossmore Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90004

Telephone: (323) 937-1400

Facsimile: (323) 931-7369

Joseph C. Markowitz, Esq. (SBN 146592)

Law Offices of Joseph C. Markowitz

444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1750

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 437-1720

Facsimile: (213) 437-1721

Attorneys for Defendant Giumarra Vineyards Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

SANTOS R. VALENZUELA et al. on behalf

of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GIUMARRA VINEYARDS

CORPORATION, a California corporation;

and DOE 1 to 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:05-CV-01600-FVS-SMS

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

GIUMARRA’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT

CLASS ACTION

Case 1:05-cv-01600-AWI -SMS Document 58 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

K:\SMS\To_Be_Signed\05CV01600.o.Valenzuela.ex parte applica.wpd

The undersigned having read and considered the ex parte request submitted by defendant

Giumarra Vineyards Corporation for an extension of time to respond to the complaint, the

plaintiffs’ opposition to defendant Giumarra’s ex parte application for extension of time to

respond to complaint, and related case plaintiffs’ support for defendant Giumarra’s ex parte

application for extension of time to respond to complaint; and, further, noting that in the interim

between the receipt of the ex parte motion and the responding pleadings, the court reassigned the

district court judge who will be handling this case and the related case, and finally, since the

scheduling conference/case management conference in both cases has been continued to May 25,

2006, it appears there is no prejudice to granting the motion. 

 Good cause appearing, therefor, the court orders as follows:

Defendant’s time to move, answer, or otherwise plead in response to the complaint in this

action is extended to and including March 31, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 8, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01600-AWI -SMS Document 58 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 2