Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01150/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01150-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

[Proposed] Order to File Exhibit Under Seal - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, ESQ., SBN 096625

JOEL T. ANDREESEN, ESQ., SBN 152254

MARTHA J. ROSSITER, ESQ., SBN 256234

RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES

2020 EYE STREET, BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301

TELEPHONE: (661) 323-1400 FAX: (661) 323-0132

Attorneys for Plaintiff VICTORIA YOUNGBLOOD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTORIA P. YOUNGBLOOD, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD,

CHRISTOPHER DALTON, GREG 

WILLIAMSON, and DOES 1 to 100, 

Inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:12-CV-01150-AWI-JLT

ORDER FOR RELIEF TO FILE

EXHIBIT TO PLAINTIFF’S 

OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT UNDER SEAL

///

Good cause appearing, and in the absence of objections, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

THAT the following documents submitted in support of Plaintiff’s opposition to the 

Defendants’ Summary Judgment or adjudication be filed under seal.

Case 1:12-cv-01150-JLT Document 55 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 2
[Proposed] Order to File Exhibit Under Seal - 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Martha Rossiter in Support of Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

2. Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Martha Rossiter in Support of Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

3. Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Martha Rossiter in Support of Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

4. Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Martha Rossiter in Support of Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

5. Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Martha Rossiter in Support of Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

6. Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of Martha Rossiter in Support of Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

7. Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Martha Rossiter in Support of Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

8. Exhibit 9 to the Declaration of Martha Rossiter in Support of Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

9. Exhibit 10 to the Declaration of Martha Rossiter in Support of Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

10.Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Van Bogardus in Support of the Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

11.Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Van Bogardus in Support of the Plaintiff’s 

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 30, 2013 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01150-JLT Document 55 Filed 01/02/14 Page 2 of 2