Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06731/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06731-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING 

RELATED ACTIONS, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND APPROVING SELECTION 

OF LEAD COUNSEL 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. (75484) 

Email: jtabacco@bermanesq.com 

Christopher T. Heffelfinger (118058) 

Email: cheffelfinger@bermanesq.com 

Nicole Lavallee (165755)

Email: nlavallee@bermanesq.com 

James Magid (233043) 

Email: jmagid@bermanesq.com 

BERMAN, DeVALERIO, PEASE, TABACCO 

 BURT & PUCILLO 425 California Street, 21st Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-3200

Facsimile: (415) 433-6382 

Proposed Liaison Counsel for Proposed Lead Plaintiffs 

[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HARRIET GOLDSTEIN, Individually and on

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

 

SEHAT SUTARDJA, WEILI DAI, PANTAS 

SUTARDJA, GEORGE A. HERVEY, and 

MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., 

 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C-06-06286 RMW 

CLASS ACTION 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING RELATED ACTIONS, 

APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND 

APPROVING SELECTION OF LEAD 

COUNSEL 

DATE: January 26, 2007 

TIME: 9:00 a.m. 

CTRM: 6 

CARTER BRANTNER, Individually and on

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

 

MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., 

SEHAT SUTARDJA and GEORGE A. 

HERVEY, 

 

 Defendants. 

[Captions Continued on Next Page] 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C-06-06441 SI 

*E-FILED - 2/7/07* *AMENDED*

Case 5:06-cv-06731-RMW Document 50 Filed 02/07/07 Page 1 of 8
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING 

RELATED ACTIONS, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND APPROVING SELECTION 

OF LEAD COUNSEL 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

TIMOTHY MAHRT, Individually and on

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

 

SEHAT SUTARDJA, WEILI DAI, PANTAS 

SUTARDAJA, GEORGE A. HERVEY and 

MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., 

 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C-06-06731 SBA 

SHAWN M. PERRY, Individually and on

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

 

MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., 

SEHAT SUTARDJA, WEILI DAI, PANTAS 

SUTARDJA and GEORGE A. HERVEY, 

 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C-06-07039 JSW 

 

 WHEREAS, seven separate Lead Plaintiff motions were filed in connection with these 

actions. Five have been withdrawn, which leaves only two Lead Plaintiff motions, which were 

filed by: (1) the Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“PFRS”); and (2) Monte 

Paschi Assert Management S.G.R. S.p.A., Puerto Rico Government Employees Retirement 

System, Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund, Bucks County Retirement 

Board, and Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (collectively referred to in the 

papers as the “Marvell Institutional Investor Group”). 

 WHEREAS, PFRS and the Marvell Institutional Investor Group have now jointly moved 

the Court for an Order consolidating actions, appointing both PFRS and two members of the 

Marvell Institutional Investor Group, Monte Paschi Asset Management S.G.R. S.p.A. (“Monte 

Paschi”) and Puerto Rico Government Employees Retirement System (“PRGERS”), as Lead 

Plaintiffs and approving Kohn, Swift & Graf, P.C. and Schiffrin, Barroway, Topaz & Kessler LLP 

Case 5:06-cv-06731-RMW Document 50 Filed 02/07/07 Page 2 of 8
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING 

RELATED ACTIONS, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND APPROVING SELECTION 

OF LEAD COUNSEL 3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

as Co-Lead Counsel, and Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo as Liaison Counsel. 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the remaining Lead Plaintiff 

movants, through their respective counsel of record, as follows: 

I. CONSOLIDATION 

 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42 and § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(ii) of the 

Exchange Act, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”), 

the following actions are hereby consolidated for all purposes into one action: 

Name & Case No. Date Complaint Filed Judge Assigned 

Goldstein v. Sehat 

Sutardja, et al., 3:06-cv06286-RMW 

October 5, 2006 Honorable Ronald M. 

Whyte 

Brantner v. Marvell 

Technology Group, 

Ltd., et al., 3:06-cv-06441-SI 

October 16, 2006 Honorable Susan Illston 

Mahrt v. Sehat 

Sutardja, et al., 4:06-cv06731-SBI 

October 30, 2006 Honorable Saundra B. 

Armstrong 

Perry v. Marvell 

Technology Group 

Ltd., et al., 3:06-cv-07039-

JSW 

November 13, 2006 Honorable Jeffrey S. 

White 

 2. These actions shall be referred to as the “Consolidated Action.” This Stipulation 

and Order shall apply to the Consolidated Action and to each case that is subsequently filed in this 

Court or transferred to this Court that relates to the same subject matter as in the Consolidated 

Action. 

 

Case 5:06-cv-06731-RMW Document 50 Filed 02/07/07 Page 3 of 8
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING 

RELATED ACTIONS, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND APPROVING SELECTION 

OF LEAD COUNSEL 4 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3. Every pleading in this Consolidated Action shall bear the following caption: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. 

Securities Litigation 

 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 

Master File No. 06-06286 RMW 

CLASS ACTION

[TITLE OF DOCUMENT] 

 4. When the document being filed pertains to all actions, the phrase “All Actions” 

shall appear immediately after the phrase “This Document Relates To:.” When a document applies 

to some, but not all, of the actions, the document shall list, immediately after the phrase “This 

Document Relates To:”, the docket number for each individual action to which the document 

applies, along with the name of the first-listed plaintiff in said action. 

 5. This Court requests the assistance of counsel in calling to the attention of the Clerk 

of this Court the filing or transfer of any case which might properly be consolidated as part of this 

Consolidated Action.

II. MASTER DOCKET AND MASTER FILE 

 6. A Master Docket and Master File shall be established for the Consolidated Action. 

The Master File shall be No. C-06-06286 RMW. All orders, pleadings, motions and other 

documents shall, when filed and docketed in the Master File, be deemed filed and docketed in each 

individual case to the extent applicable. When an order, pleading, motion or document is filed 

with a caption indicating that it is applicable to fewer than all of these consolidated action, the 

Clerk shall file such pleadings in the Master File and note such filing in the Master Docket and in 

the docket of each action referenced. 

Case 5:06-cv-06731-RMW Document 50 Filed 02/07/07 Page 4 of 8
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING 

RELATED ACTIONS, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND APPROVING SELECTION 

OF LEAD COUNSEL 5 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

III. NEWLY-FILED OR TRANSFERRED ACTIONS 

 7. When a case that arises out of the subject matter of this action is hereinafter filed in 

this Court or transferred to this Court from another court, the Clerk of this Court shall: 

 a. file a copy of this Order in the separate file for such action; 

 b. mail a copy of this Order to the attorneys for the plaintiff(s) in the newly 

filed or transferred case and to any new defendant(s) in the newly filed or transferred case; and 

 c. make the appropriate entry in the docket for this action. 

 8. Each new case which arises out of the subject matter of this Consolidated Action 

that is filed in this Court or transferred to this Court shall be consolidated with this action and this 

Order shall apply thereto, unless a party objecting to this Order or any provision of this Order 

shall, within ten (10) days after the date upon which a copy of this Order is served on counsel for 

such party, files an application for relief from this Order or any provision herein and this Court 

deems it appropriate to grant such application. 

IV. APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND LEAD AND LIAISON COUNSEL 

 9. Proposed lead plaintiffs PFRS, Monte Paschi and PRGERS have the largest 

financial interest in the relief sought by the class and, together, satisfy the requirements of Rule 23 

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, pursuant to § 21D(a)(3)(B)(iii) of the 

PSLRA, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(iii), PFRS, Monte Paschi and PRGERS shall be appointed as 

Lead Plaintiffs. 

10. Lead Plaintiffs have selected Kohn, Swift & Graf P.C. and Schiffrin, Barroway, 

Topaz & Kessler, LLP as proposed Co-Lead Counsel and Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt 

& Pucillo as proposed Liaison Counsel. These law firms have the requisite experience and 

expertise to lead this litigation on behalf of the putative class. Accordingly, pursuant to § 

21D(a)(3)(B)(v) of the PSLRA, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v), Kohn, Swift & Graf P.C. and 

Schiffrin, Barroway, Topaz & Kessler, LLP are approved as Co-Lead Counsel and Berman 

DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo is approved as Liaison Counsel. Counsel are to avoid

 11. Co-Lead Counsel shall have the following responsibilities and duties, which are to 

duplication of services. (rmw)

Case 5:06-cv-06731-RMW Document 50 Filed 02/07/07 Page 5 of 8
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING 

RELATED ACTIONS, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND APPROVING SELECTION 

OF LEAD COUNSEL 6 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

be carried out either personally or through counsel whom Co-Lead Counsel shall designate: 

 a. to coordinate the briefing and argument of any and all motions; 

 b. to coordinate the conduct of any and all discovery proceedings; 

 c. to coordinate the examination of any and all witnesses in depositions; 

 d. to coordinate the selection of counsel to act as spokesperson at all pretrial 

conferences; 

 e. to call meetings of the plaintiffs’ counsel as they deem necessary and 

appropriate from time to time; 

 f. to coordinate all settlement negotiations with counsel for defendants; 

 g. to coordinate and direct the pretrial discovery proceedings and the 

preparation for trial and the trial of this matter and to delegate work responsibilities to selected 

counsel as may be required; 

 h. to coordinate the preparation and filings of all pleadings; and 

 i. to supervise all other matters concerning the prosecution or resolution of the 

Consolidated Action. 

 12. Additionally, Co-Lead Counsel, assisted by Liaison Counsel, shall facilitate 

communications with the Court on behalf of plaintiffs’ counsel and assist in coordination of 

plaintiffs’ counsel’s prosecution of the case. 

 13. No motion, discovery request or other pretrial proceedings shall be initiated or filed 

by any plaintiffs without the approval of Co-Lead Counsel, so as to prevent duplicative pleadings 

or discovery by plaintiffs. No settlement negotiations shall be conducted without the approval of 

Co-Lead Counsel. 

 14. Co-Lead Counsel, assisted by Liaison Counsel, shall have the responsibility of 

receiving and disseminating Court orders and notices. 

 15. Co-Lead Counsel shall be the contact between plaintiffs’ counsel and defendants’ 

counsel, as well as the spokespersons for all plaintiffs’ counsel, and shall direct and coordinate the 

activities of plaintiffs’ counsel. 

Case 5:06-cv-06731-RMW Document 50 Filed 02/07/07 Page 6 of 8
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING 

RELATED ACTIONS, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND APPROVING SELECTION 

OF LEAD COUNSEL 7 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: January 25, 2007 BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO 

BURT & PUCILLO 

By: /s/ Nicole Lavallee 

 NICOLE LAVALLEE 

Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. 

Christopher T. Heffelfinger 

James Magid 

425 California Street, Suite 2100 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-3200 

Proposed Liaison Counsel for Proposed Lead Plaintiffs

I, Nicole Lavallee, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order . In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that 

Denis F. Sheils, Stuart L. Berman, and Bradley E. Beckworth have concurred in this filing. 

Dated: January 25, 2007 KOHN, SWIFT & GRAF, P.C. 

By: /s/ Denis F. Sheils 

 DENIS F. SHEILS 

Joseph C. Kohn 

William E. Hoese 

One South Broad Street, Suite 2100 

Philadelphia, PA 19107 

Telephone: (215) 238-1700 

Proposed Co-Lead Counsel 

Item 16 removed by the Court. (rmw)

Case 5:06-cv-06731-RMW Document 50 Filed 02/07/07 Page 7 of 8
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING 

RELATED ACTIONS, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND APPROVING SELECTION 

OF LEAD COUNSEL 8 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: January 25, 2007 SCHIFFRIN, BARROWAY, TOPAZ 

 & KESSLER, LLP 

By: /s/ Stuart L. Berman 

 STUART L. BERMAN 

 

Sean M. Handler 

Nicolette Tropiano 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

Telephone: (610) 667-7706 

Proposed Co-Lead Counsel 

Dated: January 25, 2007 NIX PATTERSON & ROACH, LLP 

By: /s/ Bradley E. Beckworth 

 BRADLEY E. BECKWORTH 

Jeffrey J. Angelovich 

205 Linda Drive 

Daingerfield, TX 75638 

Telephone: (903) 645-7333 

Additional Counsel for Proposed Lead Plaintiffs

* * * * 

[] ORDER 

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: , 2007 

 

 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

 United States District Judge 

2/7

Case 5:06-cv-06731-RMW Document 50 Filed 02/07/07 Page 8 of 8