Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00888/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00888-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK J. FERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiff(s),

 v.

DR. C DAVID, et al.,

Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-0888 CRB (PR)

SECOND ORDER OF

SERVICE

Plaintiff, a prisoner at Pelican Bay State Prison ("PBSP"), filed a pro se

civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1367 alleging

inadequate medical care for severe hemorrhoids and bacterial infection of the

penis and scrotum. Per order field on June 6, 2006, the court found that plaintiff's

allegations state a cognizable claim for relief for deliberate indifference to serious

medical needs under § 1983 and for medical malpractice under California law,

and ordered the United States Marshal to serve the named defendants. Despite

several service attempts and inquiries to PBSP officials and deputy attorney

generals at the Office of the Attorney General of California, it appears that none

of the defendants have yet been served.

Case 3:06-cv-00888-CRB Document 12 Filed 01/03/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

In the interest of justice, the clerk again shall issue summons and the

United States Marshal again shall serve, without prepayment of fees, copies of

the complaint in this matter, all attachments thereto, and copies of this and all

other orders, on the following defendants at PBSP: Dr. C. David, Nurse Becker,

MTA Ghram, Sergeant Traylor and Appeals Coordinator D. W. Bradbury. The

clerk also shall serve a copy of this order on plaintiff and the Office of the

Attorney General of California. 

Defendants shall file an answer pursuant to the Federal Rules of Procedure

and, no later than 90 days from the date of this order, file a motion for summary

judgment or other dispositive motion. A motion for summary judgment shall be

supported by adequate factual documentation and shall conform in all respects to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and shall include as exhibits all records and

incident reports stemming from the events at issue. If defendants are of the

opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment or other

dispositive motion, they shall so inform the court prior to the date their motion is

due. All papers filed with the court shall be served promptly on plaintiff.

Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the court

and served upon defendants no later than 30 days after defendants serve plaintiff

with the motion. 

Plaintiff is advised that a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. Rule 56 tells

you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. 

Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of

material fact--that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect

the result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to

judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a party you are

Case 3:06-cv-00888-CRB Document 12 Filed 01/03/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by

declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your

complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations,

depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided

in Rule 56(e), that contradicts the facts shown in the defendant's declarations and

documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you

do not submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if

appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted, your

case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952,

962-63 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) (App. A).

Plaintiff is also advised that a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) will, if granted, end your

case, albeit without prejudice. You must “develop a record” and present it in

your opposition in order to dispute any “factual record” presented by the

defendants in their motion to dismiss. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120

n.14 (9th Cir. 2003).

Defendants shall file a reply brief within 15 days of the date on which

plaintiff serves them with the opposition. 

The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. 

No hearing will be held on the motion unless the court so orders at a later date. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: Jan. 03, 2007 CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-00888-CRB Document 12 Filed 01/03/07 Page 3 of 3