Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07067/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07067-110/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

-1-

3,&$¶6AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

Kate E. Manka (SBN 180651) 

PICA Corporation 

One Embarcadero Center 

Suite 500 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 835-1217 

Facsimile: (415) 433-5994 

Gregory H. Melick (pro hac vice)

Luper Neidenthal & Logan 

1200 LeVeque Tower 

50 West Broad Street 

Columbus, OH 43215-3374 

Telephone: (614) 221-7663 

Facsimile: (866) 345-4948 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PICA Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MMCA GROUP LTD., a Virginia 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a 

Delaware corporation, PICA 

CORPORATION, an Ohio corporation, 

Defendants. 

No. C-06-7067 MMC (EMC) 

PICA CORPORATION¶S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL FILED IN 

CONNECTION WITH PICA 

&25325$7,21¶6MOTIONS IN LIMINE 

NOS. 1-8 

 [L.R. Civ. P. 79-5] 

[No Hearing Required] 

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

 

Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, and the Modified Stipulated Protective Order, 

'HIHQGDQW3,&$&RUSRUDWLRQ33,&$ ́KHUHE\UHTXHVWVSHUPLVVLRQWRILOHXQGHUVHDOWKH

following documents, or portions of documents: 

1. Exhibits B through F to the Declaration of Gregory Melick in Support of PICA 

&RUSRUDWLRQ¶VMotions in Limine 30HOLFN'HFODUDWLRQ ́). These exhibits contain information or 

ORDER GRANTING

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 887 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

-2-

3,&$¶6AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

testimony that has been designated as Confidential or AEO by other parties, or which other 

parties may wish to designate as AEO. 

2. Portions of PICA Corporation¶s Motions in Limine, which have been redacted. 

These portions of PICA¶s motions reference testimony that has been designated as Confidential or 

AEO by other parties. 

.

Civil Local Rule 79-5 provides where a party seeks to submit to the Court a document that 

has been designated by another party as confidential pursuant to a protective order, that party 

must file an Administrative Motion for a sealing order. Thereafter, within five days, designating 

party must then file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the designated 

documents are sealable, and must lodge and serve a narrowly tailored proposed sealing order 

within five days of submission. Civ. L.R. 79-5(d). 

Based on the foregoing, Defendant PICA Corporation respectfully asks that the Court 

enter an order permitting PICA to file the above referenced documents, and/or portions of 

documents, under seal. 

Dated: February 1, 2010 /s/Gregory Melick 

 By: Gregory Melick 

 Attorney for Defendant PICA 

Corporation 

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 887 Filed 03/02/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

-3-

3,&$¶6AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

On February 2, 20103,&$&RUSRUDWLRQ33,&$ ́ILOHGDQAdministrative Motion to Seal 

Material in PICA¶s Motions in Limine. The parties have filed supporting declarations 

3'HFODUDWLRQV ́HVWDEOLVKLQJWKDWWKHGHVLJQDWHGPDWHULDOLVVXEMHFWWREHLQJVHDOHG7he Court, 

having considered the Administrative Motion and Declarations, finds that the following exhibits, 

or portions thereof, shall be filed under seal: 

1. Exhibits B through F to the Declaration of Gregory Melick in Support of PICA 

&RUSRUDWLRQ¶VMotions in Limine 30HOLFN'HFODUDWLRQ ́). These exhibits contain information or 

testimony that has been designated as Confidential or AEO by other parties, or which other 

parties may wish to designate as AEO. 

2. Portions of PICA Corporation¶s Motions in Limine, which have been redacted. 

These portions of PICA¶s motions reference testimony that has been designated as Confidential or 

AEO by other parties. 

Therefore, pursuant to Rule 79 of the Local Civil Rules of the Northern District of 

California, the Amended Administrative Motion is GRANTED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

DATED: _____________, 2010 By: _______________________________ 

 Hon. Maxine Chesney 

February 1,

Plaintiff has filed a

plaintiff.

plaintiff

March 2

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 887 Filed 03/02/10 Page 3 of 3