Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05037/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05037-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MELINDA HAAG, CSBN 132612

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT, SBN IL 6191786

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

JENNIFER LEE TARN CSBN 240609

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Social Security Administration

1600 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8825

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-mail: Jennifer.Tarn@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN M. JORDAN,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Acting Commissioner, 

Social Security Administration,

 Defendant.

_______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 5:14-cv-05037-BLF

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER FOR EXTENSION TIME FOR

DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR TO 

FILE ANY CROSS-MOTIONS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned counsel, and with the 

approval of the Court, to extend the time by sixty days, from May 29, 2015 to July 28, 2015, for 

Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and/or file any cross-motion 

thereto, and extend all other dates in the Court’s November 17, 2014 Social Security Procedural Order 

accordingly. Any reply by Plaintiff would be due by August 25, 2015. This is Defendant’s first 

request for an extension.

Case 5:14-cv-05037-BLF Document 15 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

There is good cause for this extension because the instant case is being reassigned to another 

attorney within the Social Security Administration’s Office of the General Counsel, Region IX. An 

extension, therefore, is necessary to allow new counsel for Defendant an opportunity to become 

familiar with the factual and legal issues presented in Plaintiff’s portion of the joint stipulation. 

Plaintiff also requests an additional two weeks to file his reply. 

Date: May 18, 2015 SACKETT AND ASSOCIATES

By: /s/ Harvey Peter Sackett *

HARVEY PETER SACKETT

Attorney for the Plaintiff 

(* As authorized on May 18, 2015)

Date: May 18, 2015 MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Jennifer Lee Tarn

JENNIFER LEE TARN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DEFENDANT SHALL FILE HER 

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON OR BEFORE JULY 

28, 2015. PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE ANY REPLY THERETO ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 25, 

2015.

Dated: May 19, 2015 _________________________________

HON. BETH LABSON FREEMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:14-cv-05037-BLF Document 15 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 2