Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-00511/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-00511-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

HOPKINS & CARLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN JOSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

25928.001

000\688354.3

 STIPULATION

Eugene Ashley, Bar No. 171885

eashley@hopkinscarley.com

HOPKINS & CARLEY

A Law Corporation

The Letitia Building

70 S First Street

San Jose, CA 95113-2406

mailing address:

P.O. Box 1469

San Jose, CA 95109-1469

Telephone: (408) 286-9800

Facsimile: (408) 998-4790

Attorneys for Defendants

GLEN D. KUNOFSKY and DAIZY GOMEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ECLECTIC PROPERTIES EAST LLC, a 

California Limited Liability Company, et 

al.,.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE MARCUS & MILLICHAP 

COMPANY, a California corporation, et 

al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C09-00511 RMW

STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE 

FOR DEFENDANTS KUNOFSKY AND 

GOMEZ TO FILE MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 

WHEREAS, on March 22, 2010, plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint; and 

 WHEREAS, plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is 230 pages and 826 paragraphs long, 

and contains significant factual and legal complexities; and 

 WHEREAS, defendants Glen Kunofsky and Daisy Gomez seek a three (3) business-day 

extension of the current deadline to file their motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint

from Friday, April 16, 2010 to Wednesday, April 21, 2010; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs consent to such an extension. 

ORDER *E-FILED - 4/21/10*

Case 5:09-cv-00511-RMW Document 280 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 3
HOPKINS & CARLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN JOSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

25928.001

000\688354.3 - 2 -

 STIPULATION

 THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and jointly request that:

 1. Defendants Glen Kunofsky and Daisy Gomez will file their motions to dismiss the 

Amended Complaint on or before April 21, 2010;

 2. Plaintiffs shall file their oppositions to Defendants Kunofsky’s and Gomez’s 

motions to Dismiss on or before May 14, 2010; 

 3. Defendants Kunofsky and Gomez shall file any replies in support of their motions 

to dismiss on May 28, 2010, which is the date provided for by the previous Stipulated Joint

Miscellaneous Administrative Request to Set Briefing Schedule on Motions to Dismiss and to 

Exceed the Page Limits on Briefs, filed on March 29, 2010. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April ___, 2010 HOPKINS & CARLEY, ALC

 UBy: /s/ 

 EUGENE ASHLEY, Esq.

 Attorneys for Defendants

 GLEN KUNOFSKY and DAIZY GOMEZ

Dated: April ___, 2010 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP

 

 UBy: /s/ David J. George, Esq. 

 DAVID J. GEORGE, Esq.

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs (listed on Caption page)

 

 / / /

/ / / 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 5:09-cv-00511-RMW Document 280 Filed 04/21/10 Page 2 of 3
HOPKINS & CARLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN JOSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

25928.001

000\688354.3

ORDER

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Plaintiffs and Defendants Kunofsky and Gomez, it is 

ordered that:

1. Defendants Kunofsky and Gomez may file motions to dismiss the First Amended 

Complaint on or before April 21, 2010;

2. All other briefing related to such motions, and the hearing on such motions, shall be as 

set forth in the Court’s April 15, 2010 Order setting the briefing schedule, page limits and hearing 

date for Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: April _________ , 2010

_______________________________

HONERABLE RONALD M. WHYTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21

Case 5:09-cv-00511-RMW Document 280 Filed 04/21/10 Page 3 of 3