Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-80/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO.,

LTD.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MEDIATEK, INC., et al.,

Defendants 

MEDIATEK, INC,

Counterclaimant,

 v.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO.,

LTD., et al.

Counterclaim Defendants

 /

No. C 05-3148 MMC

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

By order filed May 1, 2007, the Court directed plaintiff to file in the public record, no

later than May 7, 2007, a redacted version of Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of David Pollock,

and advised plaintiff that if it did not timely file such redacted version, the Court would direct

the Clerk to file the unredacted document in the public record. To date, plaintiff has not

filed a redacted version of Exhibit 7.

//

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1023 Filed 05/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to file Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of David Pollock

in the public record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 8, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1023 Filed 05/08/07 Page 2 of 2