Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04579/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04579-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

Case No. 14-cv-04579-PSG

CASE SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT MAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT MCDONALD, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-04579-PSG

CASE SCHEDULING ORDER

(Re: Docket No. 27)

The court held a case management conference in this matter on April 14, 2015.1

Subsequently, the court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss,

2

Plaintiff Vincent May filed an 

amended complaint3and the court partially granted another motion to dismiss that complaint.4 On 

November 13, 2015, Defendants filed an answer to the operative complaint.5 Because the 

pleadings are now fixed, the court sets a schedule based on the parties’ most recent joint case 

management statement6as follows:

IT IS ORDERED that the presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure shall apply to this case.

 

1

See Docket No. 30.

2

See Docket No. 37.

3

See Docket No. 38.

4

See Docket No. 46.

5

See Docket No. 49.

6

See Docket No. 27.

Case 3:14-cv-04579-LB Document 50 Filed 03/21/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 14-cv-04579-PSG

CASE SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall use a letter briefing procedure to resolve 

discovery disputes. If the parties are unable to resolve such a dispute through meeting and 

conferring, each party may submit a five-page letter brief to the court summarizing its position. 

The court will resolve the dispute on the papers or set a hearing if necessary.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following schedule and deadlines shall apply to this 

case:

Fact Discovery Cut-Off...........................................................................................June 2, 2016

Designation of Opening Experts with Reports......................................................June 16, 2016

Designation of Rebuttal Experts with Reports......................................................June 30, 2016

Expert Discovery Cut-Off..................................................................................... July 28, 2016

Dispositive Motions Filing Deadline ............................................................... August 18, 2016

Dispositive Motions Hearing ................................................ September 27, 2016 at 10:00 AM

Pre-Trial Conference ..............................................................November 22, 2016 at 10:00 AM

Jury Trial .................................................................................. December 12, 2016 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 21, 2016

_________________________________

PAUL S. GREWAL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-04579-LB Document 50 Filed 03/21/16 Page 2 of 2