Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00698/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00698-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BARBARA SHAWCROFT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ROUNDPOINT MORTGAGE 

SERVICING CORPORATION, a Florida 

Corporation; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE 

CORPORATION, a California 

Corporation; and Does 1 through 10, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-00698 MCE KJN 

ORDER 

 The parties met in settlement conference on August 5, 2016. At that conference the 

parties desired to explore a phased settlement process, and agreed to certain actions to be taken 

within the next four weeks. During this period and for a time afterwards, it is helpful if discovery 

cutoff is modified. 

 Accordingly, no later than August 22, 2016, plaintiff shall produce all available evidence 

concerning mortgage payments made by plaintiff to Roundpoint Mortgage for those payments 

which are disputed by plaintiff, i.e., plaintiff asserts she may have made them, and Roundpoint 

disagrees. No later than September 6, 2016, the parties shall submit a joint letter to the 

undersigned (as part of a continuing settlement process) setting forth their agreement concerning 

Case 2:15-cv-00698-MCE-KJN Document 27 Filed 08/09/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

disputed payments, or what disputes remain with respect to payments made. The parties shall 

shortly thereafter contact the chambers of the undersigned for scheduling a conference call to 

flesh out what further conferences might be useful, or to attempt to settle matters telephonically. 

 With authorization of the district judge, discovery cutoff in this action is continued to 

October 31, 2016 with the proviso that plaintiff shall not propound discovery during this period, 

and defendant shall not move to adjudicate possible discovery disputes up through and including 

September 6, 2016. Notwithstanding discovery cutoff of October 31, 2016, defendant may take 

plaintiff’s deposition anytime up through December 31, 2016, i.e., this is the one and only 

exception to the October 31, 2016 cutoff. The meaning of discovery cutoff shall otherwise 

remain as defined by the district judge in this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 8, 2016 

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Shaw0698.ggh 

Case 2:15-cv-00698-MCE-KJN Document 27 Filed 08/09/16 Page 2 of 2