Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03794/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03794-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE ANIEL

 /

No. C 12-03794 JSW

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER

TO SHOW CAUSE AND

DIRECTING APPELLANTS TO

SERVE

On July 20, 2012, the Apellants filed a Notice of Appeal from the Bankruptcy Court. 

Appellants filed their opening brief on September 27, 2012. Pursuant to the Scheduling Order

issued on July 20, 2012, the designated Appellee’s brief was due on October 18, 2012. On

November 1, 2012, the Court issued an Order directing the designated Appellee to show cause

why the Court should not treat the appeal as unopposed. On November 15, 2012, the

designated Appellee - the Chapter 7 Trustee - filed a response to the Order to Show Cause, in

which she advises the Court that she is not a real party in interest and was erroneously

designated as the Appellee. 

The Court then issued an Order to Appellants to show cause why their appeal should not

be dismissed for failing to properly designate the appellants. See Fed. Bank. R. Pro. 8001(a)(2). 

The Court has considered Appellants’ timely response, and it DISCHARGES the Order to

Show Cause. The Court shall not dismiss the appeal. However, it does appear from the record

that the entities listed in the “Court Service List” attached to Appellants’ Motion to Vacate Sua

Sponte Order on Certification of Discharge and the Bankruptcy Court’s Orders would be

interested parties to this appeal. (See AA43-AA52.) Accordingly, Appellants are HEREBY

ORDERED to serve a copy of their Notice of Appeal, their opening brief, and this Order on

each of those entities by January 18, 2012.

Case 3:12-cv-03794-JSW Document 15 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Any opposition to Appellants’ brief shall be due by February 19, 2013, and the Court

strongly encourages a joint opposition brief. If any party seeks to extend this deadline, they

must file a request demonstrating good cause for an extension by February 12, 2013. 

Appellants’ may file a combined reply brief by no later than March 21, 2013. If

Appellants seek to extend this deadline, they must file a request demonstrating good cause by

no later than March 14, 2013. 

If the Court does not receive any opposition by February 19, 2013, or if it does not

receive a request to extend the time to file an opposition by February 12, 2013, it shall treat the

matter as submitted an issue a ruling in due course.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2013 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:12-cv-03794-JSW Document 15 Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 2