Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06822/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06822-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELEANOR LINDQUIST,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ANN CHAPMAN, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-06822 WHA

NOTICE RE VOICEMAILS 

BY PLAINTIFF

Ms. Lindquist has left several messages with the Clerk inquiring whether the Court

would refer Mr. Yourtz to the state bar. The Court has reviewed the parties’ filings and

determined that no referral to the state bar is necessary at this time. Ms. Lindquist should not

inquire about this further.

Ms. Lindquist has also alleged in a voicemail to the Clerk that the court reporter’s

transcript was inaccurate. This is not a proper motion. It will be ignored. Even assuming that

the Court has jurisdiction (Ms. Lindquist having appealed the dismissal of this case), Ms.

Lindquist would have to file a proper motion to seek relief based on any alleged inaccuracy of

the transcript.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-06822-WHA Document 67 Filed 08/29/07 Page 1 of 1