Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00309/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00309-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY ADONIS MURPHY, 

Plaintiff,

v.

KELSO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:12-cv-00309-LJO-JLT (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

(Docs. 50, 52, 58)

Plaintiff, Gregory Adonis Murphy, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 30, 2011. This 

action is proceeding on Plaintiff's claims in the First Amended Complaint for relief under section 

1983 against Defendants Allison, Enenmoh, and Metts for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's 

serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Docs. 17, 18.) The matter was 

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 

302.

On January 27, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which

recommended denial of Plaintiff’s Motions for Summary Judgment which contained notice that 

objections were to be filed within thirty days. (Doc. 58.) Plaintiff filed objections to which 

Defendants responded. (Docs. 59, 60.) 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Case 1:12-cv-00309-LJO-JLT Document 61 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 27, 2015, is adopted in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s Motions for Summary Judgment, filed October 27, 2014 and November 

21, 2014, are DENIED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00309-LJO-JLT Document 61 Filed 03/09/15 Page 2 of 2