Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00393/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00393-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

QWEST COMMUNICATIONS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-393 MCE KJM 

vs.

HERAKLES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

 Defendant Sandy Beaches’ motion to compel further responses to interrogatories

came on regularly for hearing October 24, 2007. Mark Epstein, Charles Steese, and Phillip

Douglass appeared telephonically for plaintiff. Loren Kieve and Ben Feuer appeared

telephonically for defendant Sandy Beaches. No appearance was made for the remaining

defendants. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the

arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS

FOLLOWS:

1. The motion to compel further responses to interrogatories numbers 1, 2, 3, 4

and 7 is granted. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall provide verified,

fully integrated responses, without incorporation of pleadings or other documents. In responding

to the interrogatories, subject to plaintiff’s obligations of supplemental disclosure under Federal

Case 2:07-cv-00393-MCE -KJM Document 86 Filed 10/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e), plaintiff is not obliged at this time to identify from the documents

produced by defendants each act or omission it contends supports its allegations.

2. The motion to compel further responses to interrogatories numbers 5, 6, 8 and

9 is denied as unnecessary.

DATED: October 24, 2007.

006

qwest.oah 

Case 2:07-cv-00393-MCE -KJM Document 86 Filed 10/25/07 Page 2 of 2