Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00801/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00801-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Anthony Tyrone Campbell Sr. is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On December 17, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to extend the discovery and dispositive 

motion deadlines following final resolution of their motion for summary judgment. 

This action is proceeding against Defendants Mendez, Aguinaga, Ramos, Cardenas, and 

Barajas for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 

On May 4, 2015, Defendants filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 26.) On May 6, 

2015, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order, setting the deadline for completion of 

discovery on January 6, 2016, and the dispositive motion deadline of March 14, 2016. (ECF No. 27.) 

Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment relating to exhaustion of the administrative 

remedies on August 28, 2015. After the motion was fully briefed, the undersigned issued Findings 

ANTHONY TYRONE CAMPBELL, SR.

 Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.:1:14-cv-00801-DAD-SAB (PC)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST 

TO EXTEND THE DISCOVERY AND 

DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES 

FOLLOWING FINAL RESOLUTION OF THEIR 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

RELATING TO EXHAUSTION

[ECF No. 46]

Case 1:14-cv-00801-DAD-SAB Document 47 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and Recommendations to grant Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 42.) The Findings and 

Recommendations are still pending before the Court. 

Defendants request that the discovery and scheduling order be modified to allow Defendants a 

period of sixty days to complete discovery following the Court’s final ruling on the pending motion 

for summary judgment and a further sixty days following the completion of discovery to file any 

dispositive motions, should Defendants not prevail on the motion. (ECF No. 3, Mot. at 3.) 

Good cause having been presented to the Court, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants 

shall be granted a sixty days extension of the discovery deadline and a correlating sixty day extension 

of the dispositive motion deadline, if Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is ultimately denied. 

Such order shall issue, if necessary, following final resolution of Defendants’ motion for summary 

judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 18, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00801-DAD-SAB Document 47 Filed 12/18/15 Page 2 of 2