Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00249/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00249-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLAN FLETCHER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CLENDENIN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:22-cv-00249-AWI-BAM (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY 

RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO 

SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION

(ECF No. 10)

Plaintiff Allan Fletcher (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to 

California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners 

within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 

(9th Cir. 2000).

On March 25, 2022, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations 

recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order be denied. (ECF No. 10.) 

The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any 

objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 5–6.) Plaintiff 

has not filed objections, and the deadline to do so has expired.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that 

Case 1:22-cv-00249-JLT-BAM Document 12 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on March 25, 2022, (ECF No. 10), are adopted 

in full;

2. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order, (ECF No. 8), is denied; and

3. The matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings 

consistent with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 10, 2022 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-00249-JLT-BAM Document 12 Filed 06/10/22 Page 2 of 2