Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02729/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02729-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

LOIS LYNN BISHOP,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-06-2729 GEB EFB

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

Defendant County of Sacramento filed a discovery motion on December 18, 2007, and

set the matter for hearing on January 23, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. Notwithstanding the three days

specified by E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-251, the joint statement shall be filed not later than five court

days before the scheduled hearing. The filing deadline, accordingly, will be January 16, 2008,

by 5:00 p.m. In the event the hearing is rescheduled, the joint statement shall be due not later

than five court days before the rescheduled hearing.

The dispute may be organized by category, with specific discovery items attached, if

appropriate, as an exhibit. For each disputed category or individual item, include: (1) the

specific disputed discovery category or item; (2) the response; (3) the moving party’s position;

and (4) the opposition. E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-251(c)(3). Do not file separate briefing. Id.

Privilege objections must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5). Except in extraordinary

circumstances, the party claiming privilege may not submit a post-hearing privilege log. The

failure properly to support a privilege objection with a privilege log may be deemed to waive it. 

The moving party is responsible for filing the joint statement. The opposing party

nevertheless must timely draft and submit its portion. Failure of either party to use best efforts to

ensure timely filing will be cause for sanctions. 

DATED: December 20, 2007.

___________________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-02729-GEB-EFB Document 11 Filed 12/20/07 Page 1 of 1