Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02397/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02397-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 1 - 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY RULE 35 

ORDER 41075.2

HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY, LLP 

SUE ANN VAN DERMYDEN - 166158 

RENJU P. JACOB - 242388 

980 Ninth Street, Suite 1500 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 442-3333 

Facsimile: (916) 442-2348 

svandermyden@hansonbridgett.com 

rjacob@hansonbridgett.com 

Attorneys for Defendant RES-CARE California, Inc., 

d.b.a. RCCA Services 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAINA GLASSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RES-CARE CALIFORNIA, INC., d.b.a. 

RCCA SERVICES, 

Defendant. 

No. 05-CV-02397 GEB-DAD 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

ORDER TO MODIFY RULE 35 ORDER 

(Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35, Local 

Rules 83-143, 5-137) 

Pursuant to the Court’s Local Rules, Rule 83-143 and Rule 5-137, Plaintiff, DAINA 

GLASSON (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant, RES-CARE CALIFORNIA, INC., d.b.a. RCCA 

SERVICES (“Defendant”), through their respective counsel, hereby enter into the following joint 

stipulation and respectfully request that the Court modify the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 

Order, dated September 11, 2006 to continue the examination date of September 21, 2006. 

RECITALS 

1. The Court entered its original Rule 35 Order (“Order”)on September 11, 2006. 

2. The Order directed Plaintiff “to submit to a mental examination to be conducted by 

Bernard Rappaport, M.D. on 9/21/06; the examination shall last no more than 4 hrs. and consist 

of a comprehensive mental examination; counsel may observe the examination; in the event that 

the 9/21/06, examination date becomes untenable due to an irreconcilable conflict in pltf or Dr. 

Case 2:05-cv-02397-GEB-DAD Document 30 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

[JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY RULE 35 

ORDER 41075.2

Rappaport's schedule, the parties shall contact the court. (Brown, T)” 

3. On August 29, 2006, the parties participated in a mediation with mediator Vivien 

Williamson and have since reached settlement of this matter. The parties are currently working 

towards execution of a final settlement agreement. 

4. Accordingly, the parties jointly agree to continue Plaintiff’s mental examination 

currently set for September 21, 2006. Defendants have advised Dr. Bernard Rappoport, the 

psychiatrist ordered to conduct the examination, of the status of the case. 

5. The parties further jointly agree that should the parties fail to execute a settlement 

agreement, the parties will meet and confer to determine a mutually agreeable date for Plaintiff’s 

court ordered mental examination. If the parties are unable to determine a mutually agreeable 

date, they will contact the Court. 

6. Should the parties execute a settlement agreement, the parties will promptly notify the 

Court and request that it vacate the Order compelling Plaintiff to attend a mental examination. 

7. All other terms of the September 11, 2006 order shall remain in effect. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: September 20, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF ALAN ADELMAN 

By: /s/ Alan Adelman (as authorized on 

 20 September 2006)

 Alan Adelman, Esq. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, DAINA GLASSON 

DATED: September 20, 2006 ELIZABETH S. MANCL 

By: /s/ Elizabeth S. Mancl (as authorized on 

 20 September 2006)

 Elizabeth S. Mancl, Esq. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, DAINA GLASSON 

DATED: September 20, 2006 HANSON, BRIDGETT, MARCUS, 

 VLAHOS & RUDY, LLP 

By: /s/ Renju P. Jacob, Esq._____________

 Renju P. Jacob, Esq. 

 Attorney for Defendant, 

 RES-CARE CALIFORNIA, INC., d.b.a 

 RCCA SERVICES

Case 2:05-cv-02397-GEB-DAD Document 30 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING RECITALS, IT IS 

HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their counsel 

of record, that the Rule 35 Order, dated September 11, 2006 be modified as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the mental examination of Plaintiff currently ordered 

for September 21, 2006 be continued to a later date to be determined between the parties. Should 

the parties reach and finalize a settlement, the parties shall promptly notify the Court of this fact, 

and the aforesaid Order directing Plaintiff to attend a mental examination shall be vacated. If the 

parties fail to reach settlement and the parties fail to agree upon a mutually agreeable date for 

Plaintiff to attend a mental examination, the parties shall notify the Court. The Court’s order 

dated September 11, 2006 shall otherwise remain unchanged. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: September 21, 2006.

Ddad1/orders.civil/glasson2397.stipord 

- 3 - 

[JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY RULE 35 

ORDER 41075.2

Case 2:05-cv-02397-GEB-DAD Document 30 Filed 09/21/06 Page 3 of 3