Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03794/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03794-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

Heller 

Ehrman LLP

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOT. TO STRIKE AND CMC 

CASE NO.: C-06-3794 MJJ

1

ANNETTE L. HURST (Bar No. 148738) 

Annette.Hurst@HellerEhrman.com 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP

333 Bush Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104-2878 

Telephone: +1.415.772.6000 

Facsimile: +1.415.772.6268 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ACTUATE CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ACTUATE CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No.: C-06-3794 MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING 

AND BRIEFING DATES ON 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 

STRIKE AND TO CONSOLIDATE 

HEARING ON MOTION TO 

STRIKE WITH CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006 Defendant filed a Motion to Strike noticed for 

hearing on September 26, 2006; and 

WHEREAS, the initial Case Management Conference is set for September 19, 2006; 

and 

WHEREAS, Defendant’s trial counsel are located in Atlanta and Los Angeles, and 

intend to appear for both matters; and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s lead counsel with knowledge of this matter, Ms. Annette 

Hurst, is unavailable for a significant portion of the period when the opposition to the 

Motion to Strike is to be prepared and filed because of a long-planned family vacation; 

Case 3:06-cv-03794-MJJ Document 15 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-03794-MJJ Document 22 Filed 09/07/06 Page 1 of 3
Heller 

Ehrman LLP

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOT. TO STRIKE AND CMC 

CASE NO.: C-06-3794 MJJ

2

WHEREAS, the parties have courteously agreed to accommodate one another’s 

schedules and to propose consolidation of the two upcoming appearances in the interests of 

economy for the parties and the Court; and 

WHEREAS, the Court’s standing order regarding the continuance of hearing dates 

would require the current briefing schedule to remain intact rather than be continued along 

with the hearing date on the Motion to Strike; and 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agreed upon a new briefing, 

hearing and case management conference schedule; 

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, 

through their counsel of record, and the parties hereby request that the Court order as 

follows: 

1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike is continued for hearing to October 3, 2006; 

2. The initial Case Management Conference is continued from September 19, 

2006 to October 3, 2006, to be held at the same time as the hearing on 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike; 

3. Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike shall be due on or 

before September 12, 2006; and 

4. Any reply by Plaintiff to Defendant’s opposition to the motion to strike shall 

be due on or before September 19, 2006; and 

5. The Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be submitted by the parties 

on or before September 26, 2006. 

DATED: August 24, 2006 Respectfully submitted, 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

By /s/___________________________________ 

ANNETTE L. HURST 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ACTUATE CORPORATION 

Case 3:06-cv-03794-MJJ Document 15 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 2 of 3

November 13, 2006. October 24, 2006. November 21, 2006 at 2pm.

Case 3:06-cv-03794-MJJ Document 22 Filed 09/07/06 Page 2 of 3
Heller 

Ehrman LLP

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOT. TO STRIKE AND CMC 

CASE NO.: C-06-3794 MJJ

3

DATED: August ___, 2006 JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP 

By /s/___________________________________ 

MICHAEL A. GOLD 

Attorneys for Defendant 

WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ______________________ ___________________________________

 The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-03794-MJJ Document 15 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 3 of 3

9/7/2006

Case 3:06-cv-03794-MJJ Document 22 Filed 09/07/06 Page 3 of 3