Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02331/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02331-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, )

) 2:07-cv-02331-GEB-KJM

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL

)

OMKAR PROPERTIES, INC., d/b/a )

SUPER 8 EXECUTIVE SUITES; OMKAR )

PARTNERSHIP, a California General )

Partnership d/b/a SUPER 8 EXECUTIVE)

SUITES; RAMESH D. PATEL, d/b/a )

SUPER 8 EXECUTIVE SUITES; DINESH )

D. PATEL, d/b/a SUPER 8 EXECUTIVE )

SUITES; NARENDRA D. PATEL, d/b/a )

SUPER 8 EXECUTIVE SUITES, ) 

)

Defendants. )

)

On February 5, 2008, an Order was issued granting the

parties until February 18, 2008, to file a dispositional document

based on Plaintiff’s representation in the Notice of Settlement filed

January 29, 2008, that this action had settled. The February 5 Order

further stated that “[f]ailure to respond by [the February 18]

deadline may be construed as consent to dismissal of this action

without prejudice, and a dismissal order could be filed.” Since the

parties failed to file the dismissal document, and provide no reason

Case 2:07-cv-02331-GEB -KJM Document 11 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

why the Federal Court should continue exercising jurisdiction over

this settled action, this action is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 12, 2008

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-02331-GEB -KJM Document 11 Filed 03/13/08 Page 2 of 2