Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03952/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03952-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING ADR

DEADLINE

1154814.1

CAROTHERS DiSANTE &

FREUDENBERGER LLP

Mark S. Spring, State Bar No. 155114

mspring@cdflaborlaw.com

Nicole A. Legrottaglie, State Bar No. 271416

nlegrottaglie@cdflaborlaw.com

CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP

900 University Avenue

Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

Telephone: (916) 361-0991

Facsimile: (916) 570-1958

Attorneys for Defendant

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS

MANAGEMENT, LLC erroneously sued as COMCAST

INC, dba COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS

MANAGEMENT, LLC, COMCAST CABLE

COMMUNICATIONS LLC, COMCAST HOLDINGS

CORPORATION, and COMCAST CORPORATION

Daniel Ray Bacon, State Bar No. 103866

bacondr@aol.com

J. Philip Martin, State Bar No. 55100

LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL RAY BACON

234 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 864-0907

Facsimile: (415) 864-0989

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JORGE F. APARICIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JORGE F. APARICIO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMCAST INC, doing business as COMCAST

CABLE COMMUNICATIONS

MANAGEMENT, LLC, COMCAST CABLE

COMMUNICATIONS LLC, COMCAST

HOLDINGS CORPORATION, and COMCAST

CORPORATION a Pennsylvania Corporation,

and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:16-cv-03952-JST

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING

ADR DEADLINE

Action Filed: March 23, 2016

Trial Date: August 7, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 22 Filed 12/14/16 Page 1 of 5 Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 23 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING ADR

DEADLINE

1154814.1

CAROTHERS DiSANTE &

FREUDENBERGER LLP

This Joint Stipulation extending the ADR deadline is entered into between Plaintiff Jorge F.

Aparicio, on the one hand, and Defendant Comcast Communications Management, LLC on the

other hand, through their respective counsel of record, with reference to the following facts:

1. WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred regarding ADR and submitted a

stipulation agreeing to participate in mediation pursuant to ADR Local Rule 6. The Parties further

agreed to hold the mediation by the presumptive deadline of 90 days from the date of the Court’s

order referring the case to ADR. The Court granted the Parties’ stipulation on September 29, 2016.

2. WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred with the court-appointed mediator and have

agreed that additional time is necessary to conduct initial discovery and depositions in order to

have a fruitful mediation.

3. WHEREAS, Plaintiff also desires the extension because the Parties are awaiting the

resolution of the grievance of Plaintiff’s termination through Plaintiff’s union which is still

pending.

4. WHEREAS, Comcast does not believe that the pending grievance between the

Communications Workers of America and Comcast has anything to do with the ADR process in

this case and does not believe that it constitutes valid grounds for altering any dates, including the

ADR deadline, in this litigation. Nevertheless, Comcast desires additional time to conduct

discovery prior to mediation.

5. WHEREAS, the Parties agree to hold the ADR session on or before May 5, 2017.

NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing, the Parties agree and are stipulating herein,

subject to the Court’s approval, to hold the ADR session on or before May 5, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

///

///

Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 22 Filed 12/14/16 Page 2 of 5 Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 23 Filed 12/15/16 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING ADR

DEADLINE

1154814.1

CAROTHERS DiSANTE &

FREUDENBERGER LLP

Dated: December 14, 2016 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP

By: /s/ Nicole A. Legrottaglie

Nicole A. Legrottaglie

Attorneys for Defendant

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS

MANAGEMENT, LLC

Dated: December 14, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL BACON

By: /s/ Daniel Ray Bacon

Daniel Ray Bacon

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jorge F. Aparicio

Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 22 Filed 12/14/16 Page 3 of 5 Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 23 Filed 12/15/16 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING ADR

DEADLINE

1154814.1

CAROTHERS DiSANTE &

FREUDENBERGER LLP

LOCAL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION

In accordance with U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Local

Rile 5-1 (i)(3), the filing attorney attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the

document. The filing attorney will maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent

production for the Court, if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party, until one year

after the final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any).

Dated: December 14, 2016 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP

By: /s/ Nicole A. Legrottaglie

Nicole A. Legrottaglie

Attorneys for Defendant

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS

MANAGEMENT, LLC erroneously sued as COMCAST

INC, dba COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS

MANAGEMENT, LLC, COMCAST CABLE

COMMUNICATIONS LLC, COMCAST HOLDINGS

CORPORATION, and COMCAST CORPORATION

Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 22 Filed 12/14/16 Page 4 of 5 Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 23 Filed 12/15/16 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING ADR

DEADLINE

1154814.1

CAROTHERS DiSANTE &

FREUDENBERGER LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER

☐ The Parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

☐ The Parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 15, 2016

By:

JON S. TIGAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 22 Filed 12/14/16 Page 5 of 5

X

Case 3:16-cv-03952-JST Document 23 Filed 12/15/16 Page 5 of 5