Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_98-cv-06047/USCOURTS-caed-1_98-cv-06047-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHNNEY RAMEY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

G. LEWIS, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

1:98-CV-06047 OWW HC 

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

[Doc. #93]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On July 16, 2003, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition be dismissed with prejudice and judgment be entered. On September 4,

2003, the undersigned adopted the Findings and Recommendation in full, dismissed the case, and

directed that judgment be entered. The Clerk of Court entered judgment the next day. Petitioner

appealed the judgment to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On September 6, 2006, the Ninth

Circuit affirmed the judgment.

Nearly three years later, on July 7, 2009, Petitioner filed a motion for rehearing in the Ninth

Circuit. The motion was denied as untimely. On July 22, 2009, Petitioner filed a motion for

reconsideration in this Court pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure § 60(b). The motion was

U.S. District Court

E. D. California 1

Case 1:98-cv-06047-OWW -SMS Document 94 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

denied by the undersigned on February 3, 2010. Petitioner was informed that his motion was

untimely and his arguments presented no basis for relief under Rule 60(b).

On February 10, 2010, Petitioner filed another pleading, this one entitled “Notification of

Filing a Writ of Mandate, Mandanus [sic], Extraodinary [sic] Writ for the Violation of Federal

Rights, Constitutional, Statutory and Supreme Court Precedent Case Law Standard in the Denial of

First Time Filing Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition.” Petitioner again askes

for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the

final time, Petitioner is informed that his case is closed. The Court dismissed his petition with

prejudice on September 4, 2003. This Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals have considered

and denied his requests for rehearing and relief from judgment. There are no additional avenues of

relief available to Petitioner in this Court to relitigate his challenges to his underlying conviction. 

Therefore, the instant motion will be denied and the attached documentation will be returned to

Petitioner. Petitioner is informed that no further pleadings will be accepted in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1) Petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment [Doc. 93] is DENIED;

2) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to return to Petitioner the various documents and copies

attached to his motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 17, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

U.S. District Court

E. D. California 2

Case 1:98-cv-06047-OWW -SMS Document 94 Filed 02/18/10 Page 2 of 2