Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05949/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05949-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 00:0000 Cause Code Unknown

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OSCAR RODRIGUEZ JR. dba PACIFIC

CONSTRUCTION CONCEPTS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

AMERICAN EXPRESS, ADVANTA, )

BANK ONE, BANK OF AMERICA, )

CITIBANK, DISCOVER, FORD )

CREDIT, HOME DEPOT, LOWES )

COMPANIES, INC., INTERNAL )

REVENUE SERVICE, NEXTEL )

COMMUNICATIONS, PINE )

MOUNTAIN LAKE, U.S. BANKCORP, )

VALLEY FIRST CREDIT UNION, )

WELLS FARGO BANK, NBMA, and )

DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, )

)

Defendants )

____________________________________)

CV F 03-5949 AWI LJO

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

WHY ANY REMAINING

PARTIES SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISS, CASE CLOSED AND

FINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED

In this action by plaintiff Oscar Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) pursuant to the Soldier’s and

Sailor’s Act Civil Relief Act, for damages and injunctive relief, the court issued orders on April

7, 2006, and June 8, 2006, dismissing all claims for relief as to what the court is informed and

believes are the four remain defendant parties in this action. The four defendant parties that

were dismissed by the orders of April 7 and June 8 are CitiBank USA, Bank of America,

American Express Travel Related Services, and Valley First Credit Union. 

Given the multi-defendant nature of this action and given the fact that parties have been

Case 1:03-cv-05949-AWI-LJO Document 213 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

dismissed at intervals, the court will accord Plaintiff an opportunity to bring to the court’s

attention any party that remains in this action or any reason why final judgment should not be

entered and the case closed.

THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file and serve a response to

this order to show cause stating the name and status of any party remaining in this action or any

reason why this case should not be closed. Plaintiff’s response shall be filed not later than

Friday, June 30, 2006. No other party shall respond to this order except as may later be ordered

by the court. If no response is filed by June 30, 2006, the case will be closed and final

judgment entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 23, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05949-AWI-LJO Document 213 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2