Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01138/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01138-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES AUSTIN PARKS, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1138 DFL KJM P

vs.

WARDEN DAVID L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

In the order of December 15, 2006, this court noted that plaintiff’s claims

appeared to be foreclosed by the doctrine of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). 

In response to the court’s order, plaintiff has confirmed that he lost good time credits as a result

of the disciplinary action he challenges. Accordingly, because he has not alleged that the

disciplinary finding has been overturned, he cannot proceed with this action. Edwards v.

Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 643 (1997)

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

Case 2:06-cv-01138-JKS-KJM Document 10 Filed 02/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 15, 2007.

2

park1138.56

Case 2:06-cv-01138-JKS-KJM Document 10 Filed 02/16/07 Page 2 of 2