Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04811/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04811-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

BURNHAM BROWN’S STIP. TO CONT. INITIAL CASE 

MGT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1 Case No. CV 09 4811 MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BURNHAM BROWN A PROFESSIONAL 

LAW CORPORATION,

 Plaintiff, 

v.

DONALD KUNKEL, ADVANCED 

RECYCLING EQUIPMENT, INC. and BIOMASS ENERGY CONCEPTS, LLC, 

 Defendants. 

No. CV 09 4811 MMC 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Complaint Filed: October 8, 2009 

Plaintiff BURNHAM BROWN A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION, 

(“Burnham Brown”) hereby stipulates and respectfully requests that the Court continue the 

initial case management conference presently set for hearing before Hon. Judge Maxine M. 

Chesney on January 15, 2010. In support of this Stipulation, Burnham Brown states as follows:

1. Burnham Brown filed its Complaint on October 8, 2009. 

2. All defendants were properly served with the summons and Complaint on 

October 19, 2009.

Gregory D. Brown, State Bar No. 065318 

Robert M. Bodzin, State Bar No. 201327 

Kevin M. Larson, State Bar No. 245324 

BURNHAM BROWN 

A Professional Law Corporation 

P.O. Box 119 

Oakland, California 94604 

---

1901 Harrison Street, 11th Floor 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 444-6800 

Facsimile: (510) 835-6666 

E-Mail addresses: gbrown@burnhambrown.com 

 rbodzin@burnhambrown.com 

 klarson@burnhambrown.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff BURNHAM BROWN, 

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 

AND DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES

Case 3:09-cv-04811-MMC Document 11 Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 2
BURNHAM BROWN’S STIP. TO CONT. INITIAL CASE 

MGT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

2 Case No. CV 09 4811 MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. As of the date of this stipulation is filed, no defendant has appeared in this matter. 

4. As no defendant has appeared in this matter, Burnham Brown respectfully 

submits that good cause exists to continue the hearing date on the Case Management Conference 

to allow Burnham Brown to investigate all issues related to defendants failure to respond to the 

summons and complaint. This continuance will also conserve judicial resources and promote the 

interests of judicial economy. 

5. There have been no previous time modifications in this case. 

6. As no defendants have appeared at this time, the proposed time modification will 

have a no impact on the schedule for this case.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Burnham Brown as the sole appearing party in this matter 

hereby stipulates and agrees that, with the Court’s approval: 

1. The Case Management Conference is continued from January 15, 2010 to 

February 26, 2010, at 10:30 a.m., before Hon. Judge Maxine M. Chesney, 

and

2. All other deadlines related to the hearing are continued accordingly. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: January 6, 2010 BURNHAM BROWN 

 By: /s/ Kevin Larson /s/ 

 GREGORY D. BROWN 

ROBERT M. BODZIN 

KEVIN M. LARSON 

Attorneys for Plaintiff BURNHAM BROWN, 

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January _____, 2010. 

_________________________________

 HON. JUDGE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

plaintiff's request

Further, plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to file, no later than February 5, 2010,

(1) a request for entry of default as to any defendant who by that date has not filed a response

to the complaint, or, in the alternative, (2) a statement indicating why plaintiff should not be

required to make such request.

7

Case 3:09-cv-04811-MMC Document 11 Filed 01/07/10 Page 2 of 2