Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01662/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01662-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

FOLGER LEVIN & 

KAHN LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

RESPONSIVE PLEADING; CASE NO. C 07 1662 TEH 

FOLGER LEVIN & KAHN LLP 

Jiyun Cameron Lee (SB# 161667, jlee@flk.com)

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 986-2800 

Facsimile: (415) 986-2827 

Attorneys for Defendant 

The United Shoe Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MELINDA CARSTENS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

THE UNITED STATES SHOE 

CORPORATION, and DOES 1-10, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 07 1662 TEH 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR 

THE UNITED STATES SHOE 

CORPORATION TO FILE RESPONSIVE 

PLEADING TO COMPLAINT 

Plaintiff Melinda Carstens and Defendant The United States Shoe Corporation (“US 

Shoe”) hereby stipulate, by and through their respective counsel of record, as follows: 

WHEREAS, US Shoe’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due to be filed on or before 

April 24, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel agrees to permit US Shoe to file and serve its answer to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before May 15, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s consent to additional time for US Shoe to answer shall not be 

deemed to be consent to the propriety of US Shoe’s removal or consent to federal jurisdiction, 

and US Shoe agrees not to rely upon Plaintiff’s consent to additional time to advance any 

argument that Plaintiff has consented to federal jurisdiction or to the propriety of US Shoe’s 

Case 3:07-cv-01662-TEH Document 9 Filed 04/25/07 Page 1 of 2
FOLGER LEVIN & 

KAHN LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -2- STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

RESPONSIVE PLEADING; CASE NO. C 07 1662 TEH 

removal. 

This is the first extension of time granted to Defendant by Plaintiff. Defendant was first 

served in this action on April 4, 2007. 

Dated: April 24, 2007 LEWIS, FEINBERG, 

RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C. 

_____________/s/____________ 

Cassie Springer-Sullivan 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Melinda Carstens 

Dated: April 24, 2007 FOLGER LEVIN & KAHN LLP 

_____________/s/____________ 

Jiyun Cameron Lee 

Attorneys for Defendant 

The United States Shoe Corporation 

ORDER 

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April __, 2007 

______________________________________ The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson 

92014\5002\544995.1 

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:07-cv-01662-TEH Document 9 Filed 04/25/07 Page 2 of 2