Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01957/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01957-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEANETTE DALE PRINGLE, No. CIV S-02-1957-GEB-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

JIM BLALOCK, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

A status conference is hereby set before the undersigned on October 11, 2005, at

10:00 a.m. in Redding, California. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. All parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting without counsel. 

Plaintiffs proceeding pro se must each appear at the status conference and are reminded that they

may not make appearances for other plaintiffs proceeding pro se.

2. The parties shall submit to the court and serve by mail on all other parties,

no later than seven days before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, a status report

addressing the following matters:

/ / /

Case 2:02-cv-01957-GEB-CMK Document 67 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

a. Service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. The proposed discovery plan developed pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 26(f); 

g. The potential for settlement and specific recommendations regarding

settlement procedures and timing, including whether a settlement conference should be scheduled

and if so when, and whether referral to the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (see

Local Rule 16-271) is appropriate in this case;

 h. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cutoff dates for

discovery and law and motion and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;

I. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to

the relative simplicity or complexity of the action or proceedings;

j. Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in

bankruptcy;

k. Whether the counsel will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to

this matter acting as settlement judge and waiving any disqualifications by virtue of her so acting,

or whether they prefer to have a Settlement Conference before another judge; and

 l. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of

this matter.

3. Plaintiffs and defense counsel are reminded of their continuing duty to

notify chambers immediately of any settlement or other disposition (see Local Rule 16-160). In

addition, the parties are cautioned that pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(c), opposition to the

granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule

Case 2:02-cv-01957-GEB-CMK Document 67 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

further provides that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral

arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.”

Moreover, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of

opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that

failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and

all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”

DATED: September 8, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-01957-GEB-CMK Document 67 Filed 09/09/05 Page 3 of 3