Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02273/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02273-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2273

D. SIDNEY POTTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SUNTRUST BANK; RANDSTAD US, L.P.; WILLIAM ROGERS; LINDA 

GALIPEAU; CHRISTINE MILES; REGINALD FORD; MARGARET 

SLAUGHTER; CHARMAINE SURGEON; JULIE HARDY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior 

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00436-JRS)

Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 3, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

D. Sidney Potter, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy S. Lester, OGLETREE 

DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2273 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/03/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

D. Sidney Potter seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing some, but not all, claims in his employment 

discrimination action. This court may exercise jurisdiction 

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Potter seeks to appeal 

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 14-2273 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/03/2015 Pg: 2 of 2