Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02293/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02293-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMMY R. QUAIR, SR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

GERTZ, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:11-cv-2293 JAM CKD P

ORDER and FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS

Since the June 2015 settlement conference in this pro se prisoner action, plaintiff has been 

granted multiple extensions of time to file an amended complaint. (ECF Nos. 94, 97, 99, 102 & 

106.) Three times, plaintiff has been warned that “[n]o further extensions of time will be 

granted.” (ECF Nos. 99, 102 & 106.) To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint; 

rather, he seeks another extension of time. (ECF No. 108.)

In light of the above, plaintiff has not shown good cause for another extension of time. 

Thus his motion will be denied, and the undersigned will recommend dismissal of this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for extension of time 

(ECF No. 108) is denied. 

////

////

////

Case 2:11-cv-02293-JAM-CKD Document 109 Filed 01/06/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 6, 2016

2 quai2293.fta

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:11-cv-02293-JAM-CKD Document 109 Filed 01/06/16 Page 2 of 2