Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-04641/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-04641-37/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFRED LAM, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE CITY & COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 10-cv-04641-PJH 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION

Re: Dkt. No. 232

Before the court is plaintiff Alfred Lam’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s 

order on the taxation of costs (Dkt. 232). This is plaintiff’s fourth attempt to object to the 

taxation of costs and the second motion for reconsideration of the court’s May 19, 2016 

order on taxation of costs. The motion is repetitive, and untimely, and is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 2, 2016

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-04641-PJH Document 233 Filed 08/02/16 Page 1 of 1