Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04994/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04994-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

Stip and [Proposed]Order Selecting ADR Process - 1 - Levi Strauss & Co. vs. Memolink, Inc.

 Case N..C-05-04994 JW 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LEVI STRAUSS & CO., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

MEMOLINK, INC.,

Defendant.

 Case No. C 05-04994 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS

ADR CERTIFICATION 

 

The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

 Arbitration GG  ENE _ Mediation 

(To provide additional information regarding timing of the session, preferred subject matter 

expertise of neutral, or other issues, please attach a separate sheet.) 

Private Process:

_ Private ADR (please identify process and provider): JAMS, Two Embarcadero Center, 

Suite 1500, San Francisco, California 94111. 

The parties have agreed to mediate before a JAMS mediator if they cannot resolve the matter 

themselves by May 31, 2006. 

Dated: May 30, 2006 /s/Gregory S. Gilchrist

 Gregory S. Gilchrist 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 Levi Strauss & Co. 

Dated: May 30, 2006 /s/ Stephen N. Hollman

 Stephen N. Hollman 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 Memolink, Inc. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: MAY 31, 2006 ____________________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

60766999 v1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:05-cv-04994-JW Document 21 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 1