Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-01052/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-01052-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TERMPSREF

WO JKM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sheikh Samiul Haque,

Petitioner,

vs.

Katrina Kane,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-1052-PHX-GMS (JRI)

ORDER

Petitioner Sheikh Samiul Haque (A058-507-095), who is confined in the Eloy

Detention Center in Eloy, Arizona, has filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court will require Respondent to answer the Petition.

I. Petition

Petitioner alleges that immigration officials are holding him in detention pending his

removal to Bangladesh. Petitioner argues that he is entitled to release from custody because

his detention with no prospect that his removal will be effected in the reasonably foreseeable

future is not authorized by law. See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) (when there is

no reasonable likelihood that a foreign government will accept an alien’s return in the

reasonably foreseeable future, the INS may not detain the alien for more than the

presumptively reasonable period of six months). The Court will require Respondent to

answer the Petition.

II. Filing Fee

Although Petitioner paid the $5.00 filing fee when he filed this action, he

subsequently filed a Motion to Accept Late Payment of Fee (Doc. 4) and payed the $5.00 fee

Case 2:11-cv-01052-GMS Document 6 Filed 08/24/11 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TERMPSREF - 2 -

a second time. The Court will deny the Motion as moot and direct the Clerk to refund the

second payment to Petitioner.

III. Warnings

A. Address Changes

Petitioner must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner must not include a motion for other

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

action.

B. Copies

Petitioner must serve Respondent, or counsel if an appearance has been entered, a

copy of every document that he files. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a). Each filing must include a

certificate stating that a copy of the filing was served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d). Petitioner also

must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. LRCiv 5.4. Failure to

comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice to Petitioner.

C. Possible dismissal

If Petitioner fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet,

963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court may dismiss action for failure to

comply with any order of the Court).

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) Petitioner’s Motion to Accept Late Payment of Fee (Doc. 4) is denied as moot.

The Clerk of Court must forward a copy of this Order to Financial Administration of the

United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Financial Administration must

refund to Petitioner the second $5.00 payment against the filing fee in this case.

(2) The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Summons, Petition, and this Order

upon the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona by certified mail addressed to the

civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney pursuant to Rule 4(i)(1)(A) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court also must send by certified mail

Case 2:11-cv-01052-GMS Document 6 Filed 08/24/11 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TERMPSREF - 3 -

a copy of the Summons, Petition and this Order to the United States Attorney General

pursuant to Rule 4(i)(1)(B) and to Respondent pursuant to Rule 4(i)(2).

(3) Respondent must answer the Petition within 20 days of the date of service.

Respondent must not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without first showing

cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Petitioner may file a reply within 20 days from the

date of service of the answer.

(4) This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin pursuant to Rules 72.1

and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and

recommendation.

DATED this 23rd day of August, 2011.

Case 2:11-cv-01052-GMS Document 6 Filed 08/24/11 Page 3 of 3