Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_14-cv-02649/USCOURTS-casd-3_14-cv-02649-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983pr Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

14-cv-2649-JLS (KSC)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLENN S. SUNKETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

RUIZ, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 14-cv-2649-JLS (KSC)

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH 

PREJUDICE

(ECF No. 28)

Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint 

with Prejudice (“Mot. to Dismiss”). (ECF No. 28.) On November 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed 

the instant case. (ECF No. 1.) Defendants soon thereafter filed a Motion to Dismiss and 

Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 16.) Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford issued 

a Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 25), to which no party objected, and which the 

Court adopted, (ECF No. 26). In so doing, the Court dismissed all of Plaintiff’s claims and 

granted Plaintiff leave to amend one specific cause of action if he did so within thirty days. 

(Id.) 

Approximately one year and two months have passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an 

amended Complaint. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiff’s Complaint in its entirety with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (“If the 

plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may 

Case 3:14-cv-02649-JLS-KSC Document 29 Filed 05/12/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

14-cv-2649-JLS (KSC)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

move to dismiss the action or any claim against it.”); see Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 

1169 (9th Cir. 2005) (“If a plaintiff does not take advantage of the opportunity to fix his 

complaint, a district court may convert the dismissal of the complaint into dismissal of the 

entire action.”). Because this concludes the litigation in this matter, the Clerk SHALL close 

the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2017

Case 3:14-cv-02649-JLS-KSC Document 29 Filed 05/12/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2