Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01296/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01296-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONARD TURNER, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 2:08-cv-01296-PMP-GWF

)

vs. ) FINDINGS &

) RECOMMENDATIONS

RODGERS, )

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________) 

On March 2, 2010, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Amended Civil Rights Complaint (Dkt. #34)

without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to provide the Court with a current address within 60 days

of relocation as required by Local Rule 83-183(b)-2. (Dkt. #36). The Court granted Plaintiff until April

1, 2010 to file a second amended complaint and inform the Court of his current address. In addition,

the Court notified Plaintiff that failure to comply with this Order will result in the recommendation that

this action be dismissed with prejudice. To date, Plaintiff has failed to file a second amended complaint

and failed to provide the Court with his current address. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s Amended Civil Rights Complaint (Dkt.

#34) should be dismissed with prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to file a second amended

complaint in compliance with the Court’s prior order (Dkt. #36) and failure to timely inform the Court

and Defendants of his current address in compliance with Local Rule 83-183(b)-2.

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

Case 2:08-cv-01296-PMP-GWF Document 37 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE

These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty (20) days

after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with

the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may

waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED this 19th day of April, 2010.

 

GEORGE FOLEY, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:08-cv-01296-PMP-GWF Document 37 Filed 04/19/10 Page 2 of 2