Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01658/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01658-79/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR HEARING OF ORACLE’S MOTION 

PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. § 410(c) 

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257) 

GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468) 

HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045) 

ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009) 

BREE HANN (SBN 215695) 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 

Telephone: (415) 393-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 

donn.pickett@bingham.com 

geoff.howard@bingham.com 

holly.house@bingham.com 

zachary.alinder@bingham.com 

bree.hann@bingham.com 

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

333 Main Street 

Armonk, NY 10504 

Telephone: (914) 749-8200 

dboies@bsfllp.com 

STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177) 

1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 874-1000 

sholtzman@bsfllp.com 

DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049) 

JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227) 

500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7 

Redwood City, CA 94070 

Telephone: 650.506.4846 

Facsimile: 650.506.7114 

dorian.daley@oracle.com 

jennifer.gloss@oracle.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Oracle USA, Inc., et al. 

JONES DAY 

ROBERT A. MITTELSTAEDT (SBN 060359) 

JASON McDONELL (SBN 115084) 

ELAINE WALLACE (SBN 197882) 

555 California Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 626-3939 

Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 

ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com 

jmcdonell@jonesday.com 

ewallace@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY 

THARAN GREGORY LANIER (SBN 138784) 

JANE L. FROYD (SBN 220776) 

1755 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Telephone: (650) 739-3939 

Facsimile: (650) 739-3900 

tglanier@jonesday.com 

jfroyd@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY 

SCOTT W. COWAN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

JOSHUA L. FUCHS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

717 Texas, Suite 3300 

Houston, TX 77002 

Telephone: (832) 239-3939 

Facsimile: (832) 239-3600 

swcowan@jonesday.com 

jlfuchs@jonesday.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and 

TomorrowNow, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

ORACLE USA, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAP AG, et al., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) 

STIPULATED REQUEST AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING 

TIME FOR HEARING OF 

ORACLE’S MOTION PURSUANT 

TO 17 U.S.C. § 410(c) 

[Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 6(b), 

Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2, 7-1, 7-12] 

Case 4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document 803 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR HEARING OF ORACLE’S MOTION 

PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. § 410(c) 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CHANGE TIME PER CIV. L.R. 6-2

I. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS TO PERMIT ORACLE’S MOTION 

PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. § 410(c) TO BE HEARD ON 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 

Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation, Oracle EMEA 

Limited and Siebel Systems, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and 

TomorrowNow, Inc. (“Defendants”; together with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”) respectfully submit 

this Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Civ. L.R. 6-1, 

6-2, 7-1, and 7-12, requesting that the Court permit Oracle’s motion pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 

410(c) (the “§ 410(c) Motion”) to be heard at the Pretrial Conference set for September 30, 2010. 

In their Joint Pretrial Statement, the Parties agreed that “[t]he evidentiary weight 

to be given to six certificates of copyright registrations (and the factual statements in those 

registrations) . . . because the copyrights were not registered within five years of first 

publication” was a disputed point of law to be resolved by the Court. D.I. 745 at 75:19-23; see 

also 17 U.S.C. § 410(c) (stating that the evidentiary weight to be given to certificates of 

registration for registrations not made within five years of first publication “shall be within the 

discretion of the court”). Plaintiffs will file a motion requesting that the Court exercise its 

discretion with respect to these six certificates of copyright registration. See Declaration of 

Geoffrey M. Howard in Support of Stipulated Request For Order Changing Time for Hearing of 

§ 410(c) Motion (“Howard Decl.”), ¶ 3. 

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-2, motions not otherwise excused “must be filed, served 

and noticed in writing on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge for hearing not less than 

35 days after service of the motion.” (emphasis added). Plaintiffs respectfully suggest that 

setting this motion for hearing on September 30, 2010, during the Parties’ Pretrial Conference 

and in parallel with the current schedule for the parties’ Daubert motions, would be efficient and 

convenient for both the Court and the parties. See Howard Decl., ¶¶ 2, 4. Defendants agreed to 

this proposed schedule and so stipulate. Id., ¶ 4. As September 30, 2010, is not a date on Your 

Honor’s motion calendar, the Parties respectfully submit this Stipulated Request and [Proposed] 

Case 4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document 803 Filed 08/20/10 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR HEARING OF ORACLE’S MOTION 

PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. § 410(c) 

Order in compliance with Local Rules. The Parties have not previously requested relief for 

calendaring the § 410(c) Motion. Id., ¶ 6. 

Should Your Honor deny this Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order, the 

§ 410(c) Motion will be set for September 29, 2010, or as soon thereafter as permitted by the 

Court. See id., ¶ 4. Therefore, the effect of the Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order would 

be, at most, to grant Defendants one additional calendar day for their Opposition to § 410(c) 

Motion, and to grant Plaintiffs one additional calendar day for their Reply in Support of § 410(c) 

Motion. See.Civ. L.R. 7-3(a) (requiring that any opposition “be served and filed not less than 21 

days before the hearing date”); id. at (c) (requiring that any reply to an opposition “be served and 

filed not less than 14 days before the hearing date”). The Stipulated Request and [Proposed] 

Order would therefore not have any significant impact on the schedule for the case. See Howard 

Decl., ¶ 5. 

For the reasons stated above and in the accompanying declaration, good cause 

exists to grant the Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order, thereby allowing the § 410(c) 

Motion to be heard on September 30, 2010. 

DATED: August 18, 2010 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

By: /s/Geoffrey M. Howard 

Geoffrey M. Howard 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International 

Corporation, Oracle EMEA Limited, and 

Siebel Systems, Inc. 

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the above signatory attests that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. 

Case 4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document 803 Filed 08/20/10 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4 Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR HEARING OF ORACLE’S MOTION 

PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. § 410(c) 

DATED: August 18, 2010 JONES DAY 

By: 

Greg Lanier 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and 

TomorrowNow, Inc. 

Case 4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document 803 Filed 08/20/10 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

5 Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR HEARING OF ORACLE’S MOTION 

PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. § 410(c) 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: August ___, 2010 __________________________ 

 Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

 United States District Judge 

20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document 803 Filed 08/20/10 Page 5 of 5