Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-3_17-cv-00335/USCOURTS-ared-3_17-cv-00335-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

NORTHERN DIVISION

ANGELIQUE TILGHMAN PLAINTIFF

 

v. CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00335 BSM

ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT

ORDER

Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company’s (“Allstate”) objection to

Angelique Tilghman’s deposition designations [Doc. No. 85] are sustained in part. The

Power Point slides created by Dr. Harshfield may be used as demonstrative aids if they meet

the usual criteria for demonstrative aids. The slides will not be admissible as substantive

evidence unless a proper foundation is laid.

Tilghman’s objections to Allstate’s use of depositions and videotapes [Doc. No. 86]

during voir dire, opening statements, or closing arguments is sustained. Her objections to

Allstate’s specific designations of David Harshfield’s deposition are overruled.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of March 2020.

 ________________________________

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00335-BSM Document 87 Filed 03/03/20 Page 1 of 1