Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00365/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00365-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 2d CLAIM AND EXTEND JOINT STATUS REPORT DEADLINE -1-

JOSEPH W. ROSE, ESQ. 

STATE BAR NO. 232261

1671 Creekside Dr, Ste 102 

Folsom, CA 95630 

(916) 984-7840 

WILLIAM F. WRIGHT, ESQ. 

STATE BAR NO. 109470

1731 J Street, Suite 250 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

(916) 442-8614 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

-oo0ooANTHONY M. CARR, and 

DANIEL G. RAPOSE, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LAKE VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION 

DISTRICT; and DOES 1 through 100, in their 

individual capacities, 

Defendants, 

_____________________________________/ 

Case No.: 2:05-CV-00365-DFL-JFM 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS SECOND CLAIM 

FOR RELIEF AND TO EXTEND FILING 

DEADLINE OF JOINT STATUS REPORT 

INCLUDING RULE 26(f) DISCOVERY PLAN

WHEREAS, all defendants in the within action have been served; and 

WHEREAS, joinder of additional parties is not anticipated; and 

WHEREAS, no further amendment of pleadings is expected or desired; and 

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred regarding defendants’ F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) Motion 

for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Complaint now set to be heard on June 22, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., 

in the Courtroom of the Honorable David E. Levi, United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of California; and 

Case 2:05-cv-00365-DFL -JFM Document 14 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 2d CLAIM AND EXTEND JOINT STATUS REPORT DEADLINE -2-

WHEREAS, the parties will stipulate to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Claim for Relief 

relating to alleged violations of the California Public Employees’ Retirement Law (Cal. Gov. 

Code §§ 2000 et seq.); and 

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred as required by Rule 26(f); and 

WHEREAS, the dismissal of Plaintiff’s Second Claim for Relief will necessitate 

additional time to complete preparation of the joint status report including the Rule 26(f) 

discovery plan. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, by 

their respective counsel, that Plaintiff’s Second Claim for Relief alleging violations of the 

California Public Employees’ Retirement Law (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 2000 et seq.) is dismissed 

from this action. 

It is further stipulated, subject to approval of this Court, that paragraph (4) of the Court’s 

Order Requiring Joint Status Report be modified so as to direct filing of the joint status report and 

Rule 26(f) discovery plan on or before May 11, 2005. 

Dated: April 28, 2005. JOSEPH W. ROSE, ESQ. 

 WILLIAM F. WRIGHT, ESQ. 

 ______________ 

Joseph W. Rose 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

/s/ William F. Wright as authorized on 2/23/05

William F. Wright 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: April 29, 2005 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 

 

 _______________________________ 

Arthur A. Hartinger 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 

Case 2:05-cv-00365-DFL -JFM Document 14 Filed 05/03/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 2d CLAIM AND EXTEND JOINT STATUS REPORT DEADLINE -3-

 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: April 29, 2005 

______________________________ 

DAVID F. LEVI 

United States District Judge

 

Case 2:05-cv-00365-DFL -JFM Document 14 Filed 05/03/05 Page 3 of 3