Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00236/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00236-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Judgment (1:14-cv-00236-LJO-GSA)

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672

Attorney General of California

CONSTANCE L. LELOUIS, State Bar No. 148821

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

AARON JONES, State Bar No. 248246

Deputy Attorney General

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000

San Francisco, CA 94102-7004

Telephone: (415) 703-5868

Fax: (415) 703-1234

E-mail: Aaron.Jones@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SILVIA LOPEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

GENEVIEVE SHIROMA, an individual; 

CATHRYN RIVERA-HERNANDEZ, an 

individual; J. ANTONIO BARBOSA, an 

individual; SILAS SHAWVER, an 

individual; and DOES 1 - 20,

Defendants.

1:14-cv-00236-LJO-GSA

JUDGMENT

Courtroom: Four

Judge: The Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill

Trial Date: None Set

Action Filed: February 21, 2014

Case 1:14-cv-00236-LJO-EPG Document 52 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Judgment (1:14-cv-00236-LJO-GSA)

On September 14, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit entered its judgment 

via Memorandum disposition on the appeal of defendants Genevieve Shiroma, Cathryn RiveraHernandez, J. Antonio Barbosa, and Silas Shawver (“Defendants”) granting qualified official

immunity to Defendants and denying the request for leave to amend of plaintiff Silvia Lopez 

(“Plaintiff”) (together with Defendants, the “Parties”). (Dkt. 46.) The Mandate issued on 

October 7, 2016. (Dkt. 48.) The Complaint’s Second Cause of Action is dismissed by stipulation 

of the parties filed concurrently herewith and the Court’s order thereon. Therefore, and pursuant 

to the stipulation of the Parties, FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of all Defendants 

and against Plaintiff on the First and Third Causes of Action set forth in Plaintiff’s Complaint in 

their entirety and those causes of action are dismissed with prejudice. Pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 54(b), the Court hereby finds that there is no just reason to delay of entry of final 

judgment on the Complaint’s First and Third Causes of Action, which, with dismissal of the 

Second Cause of Action, fully resolve this case. 

The CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00236-LJO-EPG Document 52 Filed 10/24/16 Page 2 of 2