Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_12-cv-00304/USCOURTS-almd-2_12-cv-00304-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 NORTHERN DIVISION 

VALERIE MALISSIA VEAZEY LOUCKS ) 

and AMANDA VICTORIA WOODHAM, ) 

Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv304-WHA 

 ) 

SHOREST, LLC, and RHI, INC. d/b/a ) (wo) 

SHONEY=S OF CLANTON, ) 

 ) 

Defendants. ) 

ORDER 

This cause is before the court on the Plaintiffs= Response to the Defendants= Motion in 

Limine. In its Order, the court gave the Plaintiffs time in which to specifically identify evidence 

of other cases or claims they seek to admit at trial and the identity of witnesses through whom 

such evidence would be elicited. 

The Plaintiffs have provided deposition excerpts from Sharon Biafore in which she refers 

to complaints, including complaints of harassment, but then the Plaintiffs merely state in their 

brief that they intend to present Ageneral evidence about these claims and how they were 

resolved/managed.@ The Plaintiffs are given until noon on May 7, 2013 to supplement their 

response and identify specifically the names of the complainants, where they were employed, the 

nature of the complaints, the specifics of how the complaints were resolved, and the witness or 

witnesses the Plaintiffs intend to call to provide this testimony. 

 Done this 6th day of May, 2013. 

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:12-cv-00304-WHA-CSC Document 70 Filed 05/06/13 Page 1 of 1