Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03424/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03424-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

David M. Poore, SBN 192541 

KAHN BROWN & POORE LLP 

755 Baywood Drive, Suite 185 

Petaluma, California 94954 

Telephone: (707) 763-7100 

Facsimile: (707) 763-7180 

dpoore@kahnbrownlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MUMTAZ SHEREEN SUHAIL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MUMTAZ SHEREEN SUHAIL,

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

NAVIGANT INTERNATIONAL, INC.; TQ3 

NAVIGANT; TQ3 TRAVEL SOLUTIONS; 

and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 06-03424 MHP 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED UPON by the parties and their respective

counsel of record that the initial case management conference (“CMC”) be continued for 

approximately 60 days from September 25, 2006, at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San 

Francisco, California, to a date to be set by the Court. The parties agree that the following 

constitutes good cause to continue the initial CMC: 

• A dispute has arisen over which entity is the appropriate defendant in this matter. 

Defendants contend that the appropriate defendant is “Navigant Southwest LLC.” 

Plaintiff believes that the above-named defendants are proper. 

• The parties have engaged in substantial meet and confer efforts over the past 45 

days to resolve this dispute without extensive motion practice and unnecessary 

discovery as to which entity is plaintiff’s actual employer. Over the past week, the 

SUHAIL V. NAVIGANT, INC., ET. AL., CASE NO. C 06-03424 MHP 

 -1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CMC

Case 3:06-cv-03424-MHP Document 4 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

parties have reached a tentative agreement that would allow the parties to enter 

into a stipulation of fact resolving the dispute, including a stipulation for

amendment of the complaint, dismissal without prejudice of the above named 

defendants, and a statute of limitations tolling agreement during the pendency of

this litigation. The parties anticipate that the stipulation will be finalized within 

the next week. 

• The parties request that the initial CMC be continued for 60 days to finalize this

stipulation to allow the amended defendant Navigant Southwest LLC to file an 

answer. 

• The parties are not making this request for the purposes of any delay. Instead, the 

parties are making this request to avoid unnecessary motion practice, including 

motions to dismiss and/or summary judgment, that would unduly burden the Court 

with legal issues that are being resolved by the parties, including unnecessary 

attorneys’ fees and costs in litigating this dispute. 

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: September 14, 2006 KAHN BROWN & POORE LLP 

 By: /s/ 

David M. Poore 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: September 14, 2006 MANATT PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP 

 By:___________/s/__________________________ 

Andrew Satenberg 

Attorneys for Defendants 

 -2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CMC

SUHAIL V. NAVIGANT, INC., ET. AL., CASE NO. C 06-03424 MHP 

Case 3:06-cv-03424-MHP Document 4 Filed 09/19/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 IT IS SO ORDERED. The initial case management conference is continued from 

September 25, 2006, at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco, California, to 

_______________________________, at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco, 

California. 

Dated: _____________________ ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

SUHAIL V. NAVIGANT, INC., ET. AL., CASE NO. C 06-03424 MHP 

 -3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CMC

November 27, 2006 9/18/2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-03424-MHP Document 4 Filed 09/19/06 Page 3 of 3