Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05370/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05370-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VIOLET BLUE,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

ADA MAE JOHNSON,

Defendant. /

No. C07-05370 MJJ

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a) TO

AMEND COMPLAINT

Before the Court is Plaintiff Violet Blue’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Leave Pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 15(a) to Amend Complaint. (“Motion to Amend,” Docket No. 9.) 

Plaintiff originally filed the Motion on December 21, 2007 and noticed it for hearing on

January 29, 2008. Defendant Ada Mae Johnson (“Defendant”) failed to file a timely opposition or

statement of non-opposition. On January 17, 2008, the Court vacated the hearing and issued an

Order to Show Cause. On January 21, 2008, Defendant timely responded to the Order to Show

Cause, and indicated that she does not oppose the Motion. As the Motion is unopposed, and good

cause appearing therefor, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiff shall file the Amended

Complaint within five (5) days of entry of this Order.

The Court further finds that the declaration submitted by Defendant’s counsel sufficiently

explains the circumstances that led to Defendant’s failure to comply with the local rules and to

timely respond to the Motion. The Court is persuaded that there is little risk that the problem will be

repeated, and finds that sanctions are inappropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2008 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-05370-SI Document 22 Filed 01/28/08 Page 1 of 1