Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03376/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03376-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD KUHNLE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-3376 LKK KJM PS

vs.

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed December 17, 2010, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired,

and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

/////

Case 2:09-cv-03376-LKK -KJM Document 4 Filed 02/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 19, 2010. 

kuhn3376.fta

Case 2:09-cv-03376-LKK -KJM Document 4 Filed 02/19/10 Page 2 of 2