Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00637/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00637-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

William Sharkozy, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Superior Court of Gila County, et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-0637-PHX-FJM

ORDER

We have before us plaintiff’s “Response to this Court’s Judgment and Demand to

Reopen Case” (doc. 12), and defendants’ response (doc. 13). On June 3, 2008, we granted

defendants’ motion to dismiss with prejudice and instructed the clerk to enter final judgment.

Plaintiff filed the present motion on July 3, 2008. 

If we construe plaintiff’s motion as a motion to alter or amend the judgment under

Rule, 59(e), Fed. R. Civ. P., it is untimely and is denied. If it is construed as a motion for

relief from a final judgment under Rule 60(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., it is also denied because

plaintiff asserts no valid grounds to justify such relief. 

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiff’s “Response to this Court’s

Judgment and Demand to Reopen Case” (doc. 12). 

Case 2:08-cv-00637-FJM Document 14 Filed 07/25/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

We note for plaintiff’s benefit that judicial review of the judgments of the Superior

Court of Arizona lies in the Arizona Court of Appeals. 

DATED this 24th day of July, 2008.

Case 2:08-cv-00637-FJM Document 14 Filed 07/25/08 Page 2 of 2