Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02645/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02645-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY L. BROWN, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-2645 GEB KJM P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER AND

 / FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of

civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On May 2, 2006 the court ordered plaintiff to submit the documents necessary to

effectuate service of process upon defendants Braida, T. Cole, Fleischman and Halsath. Plaintiff

submitted the required documents but failed to include correct addresses on the USM 285 forms. 

In a letter submitted June 19, 2006, plaintiff admits that he was not aware of addresses for

Braida, T. Cole, Fleischman and Halsath. 

On September 21, 2006, plaintiff filed a document indicating that he has now

obtained addresses for Braida, Fleischman and Halsath. Plaintiff still has not obtained an

address for T. Cole. Good cause appearing, plaintiff will be given one final opportunity to

provide the court with the necessary documents so that process may be served on defendants

Case 2:02-cv-02645-ALA Document 89 Filed 05/03/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Braida, Fleischman and Halsath. The court will recommend that T. Cole be dismissed because

plaintiff has not obtained his address, has not indicated how he might obtain his address or

reasonably indicated to the court how the court may assist plaintiff in obtaining Cole’s address. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff three USM-285 forms,

along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the second amended complaint filed December 20,

2004.

2. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and

submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following

documents:

a. One completed USM-285 form each for defendant Braida, Fleischman

and Halsath; and 

b. Four copies of the endorsed second complaint filed December 20,

2004.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant T. Cole be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 2, 2007.

1/brow2645.36

Case 2:02-cv-02645-ALA Document 89 Filed 05/03/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY L. BROWN, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-2645 GEB KJM P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 completed USM-285 forms

 copies of the 

 Second Amended Complaint

DATED:

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:02-cv-02645-ALA Document 89 Filed 05/03/07 Page 3 of 3