Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00369/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00369-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN KING, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-00369-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 13)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On July 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for

Petitioner's failure to prosecute. (Doc. 13). The Report and Recommendation was served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty days from the date of

service of that order. To date, no party has filed objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Case 1:05-cv-00369-OWW -TAG Document 15 Filed 10/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation issued July 19, 2006 (Doc. 13), is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and,

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00369-OWW -TAG Document 15 Filed 10/12/06 Page 2 of 2