Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05434/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05434-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

STIPULATION RE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS; 

Bautista v. CCSF, et al. – SFSC No. CGC-07-467555

 c:\documents and settings\workstation\local 

settings\temp\notesf8c1a4\00470074.doc 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Deputy 

SCOTT D. WIENER, State Bar #189266 

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-4283 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALEXIS BAUTISTA, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAN 

FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER 

WILLIAMS, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE 

SERGEANT ESPINOZA, SAN 

FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER LUM, 

DOES 1 to 20, Inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C07-5434 CW 

STIPULATION AND [ORDER 

REGARDING SERVICE AND 

ANSWER OF INDIVIDUALLY 

NAMED OFFICER-DEFENDANTS

Case 4:07-cv-05434-CW Document 21 Filed 03/19/08 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION RE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS; 

Bautista v. CCSF, et al. – SFSC No. CGC-07-467555

 c:\documents and settings\workstation\local 

settings\temp\notesf8c1a4\00470074.doc 

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The parties hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 

1. Defendants Williams, Lum, and Espinosa are deemed to have been personally served 

with summons and complaint. 

2. The answer (including without limitation the denial, affirmative defenses, and prayer 

for relief) filed in Superior Court by the City and County of San Francisco shall also be deemed to 

be the answer of Defendants Williams, Lum, and Espinosa. Defendants Williams, Lum, and 

Espinosa therefore will not need to file answers in addition to the City's answer filed in Superior 

Court. 

Dated: March 5, 2008 

DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER 

Chief Trial Deputy 

SCOTT D. WIENER 

Deputy City Attorney 

 -/s/- Scott D. Wiener

By: 

SCOTT D. WIENER 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

Dated: March 5, 2008 

LAW OFFICE OF NORMAN NEWHOUSE 

 -/s/- Norman Newhouse

By: 

NORMAN NEWHOUSE 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ALEXIS BAUTISTA 

SO ORDERED. 

 3/19/08 

______________________________________ ________________ 

HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN DATE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:07-cv-05434-CW Document 21 Filed 03/19/08 Page 2 of 2