Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01850/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01850-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADAM TRUJILLO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1850 MCE KJM P

vs.

COUNTY OF MODOC, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed December 11, 2007, plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to

file an amended complaint, or in the alternative, if he chose not to amend, to notify the court and

the court would issue the documents necessary for service on defendant Nessling. The thirty day

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded

to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

Case 2:07-cv-01850-MCE -KJM Document 12 Filed 03/03/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 29, 2008.

truj1850.fta

Case 2:07-cv-01850-MCE -KJM Document 12 Filed 03/03/08 Page 2 of 2