Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02122/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02122-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Constance R. Lindman (pro hac vice pending) 

SMITHAMUNDSEN LLC 

201 N. Illinois St., Ste. 1400 

Capital Center, South Tower 

Indianapolis, IN 46204-4212 

Tel. (317) 464-4102 Fax (317) 464-4103 clindman@salawus.com 

Gregg A. Rapoport (SBN 136941) 

LAW OFFICES OF GREGG A. RAPOPORT, APLC 

444 S. Flower St., Ste. 1700 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Tel. (213) 438-5285 Fax (213) 478-0955 gar@garlaw.us 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE CAAS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE 

CAAS, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

PARAMOUNT EQUITY MORTGAGE, 

LLC, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:16−CV−02122-JAM-GGH 

Hon. John A. Mendez 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE 

[FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] 

STIPULATION 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties to 

this action have entered into and now request the Court to approve by the attached 

Order the following Stipulation: 

WHEREAS, 

Case 2:16-cv-02122-JAM-GGH Document 13 Filed 12/07/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1. On September 6, 2016, Plaintiff Interactive Intelligence CaaS, Inc. 

(“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Paramount Equity Mortgage, LLC 

(“Defendant”) (Plaintiff and Defendant are sometimes referred to collectively as 

“the Parties”). 

2. By stipulation filed on September 15, 2016 (Dkt. #6), and by Orders 

on Stipulations entered on October 26, 2016 and November 29, 2016 (Dkt. #9 and 

#11), Defendant’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint in this action was 

extended. 

3. The Parties wish to dismiss this action in its entirety, with prejudice. 

NOW THEREFORE, 

 The Parties, through their respective counsel herein, HEREBY STIPULATE 

TO DISMISS THIS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: December 7, 2016 BOUTIN JONES INC. 

By: /s/ Michael E. Chase*1

Michael E. Chase 

Bashar S. Ahmad 

Attorneys for Paramount Equity Mortgage, 

LLC 

Dated: December 7, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF GREGG A. 

 RAPOPORT, APLC 

By: /s/ Gregg A. Rapoport

Gregg A. Rapoport 

Attorneys for Interactive Intelligence CaaS, 

Inc. 

 

* Filed with permission obtained December 7, 2016. 

Case 2:16-cv-02122-JAM-GGH Document 13 Filed 12/07/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ORDER

The foregoing Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice of Plaintiff 

Interactive Intelligence CaaS, Inc. and Defendant Paramount Equity Mortgage, 

LLC, executed by and through their respective counsel, is APPROVED, and IT IS 

ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 12/7/2016 

/S/ John A. Mendez ___________ 

Hon. John A. Mendez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-02122-JAM-GGH Document 13 Filed 12/07/16 Page 3 of 3