Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-2_09-cv-01025/USCOURTS-alnd-2_09-cv-01025-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANTHONY WARREN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, et al.,

Defendants.

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

Case No.: 2:09-CV-1025-RRA

ORDER

This case is before the court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc.

#57), entered June 23, 2010. Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously

herewith, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants Cityof Hoover

and McDuffy's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #37), filed January 25, 2010, is GRANTED, and the court

ORDERS as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Count Four (Failure to Supervise), insofar as it contains a claim against

Defendant City of Hoover, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2. Plaintiff's Count Five (Inadequate Training), insofar as it contains a claim against

Defendant City of Hoover, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

3. Plaintiff's Count Eight (Denial of Due Process), insofar as it contains a claim against

Defendants City of Hoover and McDuffy, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

4. Plaintiff's Count Nine (Civil Conspiracy), insofar as it contains a claim against

Defendant McDuffy, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

5. Plaintiff's Count Eleven (Outrage), insofar as it contains a claim against Defendant

McDuffy, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

FILED

 2010 Aug-13 AM 10:01

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 2:09-cv-01025-JHE Document 62 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 2
DONE and ORDERED this 13th day of August, 2010.

___________________________________

R. DAVID PROCTOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 2:09-cv-01025-JHE Document 62 Filed 08/13/10 Page 2 of 2