Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01169/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01169-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GERROD HERNDON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL 

HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-1169 CKD P

ORDER &

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, commenced this action in March 2016. Plaintiff submitted a 

request to proceed in forma pauperis; however, it was incomplete. (ECF No. 2.) On June 9, 

2016, the court directed plaintiff to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified 

copy of his prison trust account statement within thirty days, or face dismissal of this action. 

(ECF No. 4.) The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not submitted the required 

documents or responded to the court’s order. Thus the undersigned will recommend that this 

action be dismissed without prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district 

judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Case 2:16-cv-01169-MCE-CKD Document 5 Filed 07/25/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: July 22, 2016

2 / hern1169.fifp

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-01169-MCE-CKD Document 5 Filed 07/25/16 Page 2 of 2