Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01592/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01592-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Administrative Committee for the WalMart Stores, Inc. Associates’ Health and

Welfare Plan, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Alice Salazar; Frank Lesselyong; and

Kleinman, Lesselyong, Novak & Russell,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-1592-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Pending before the Court are the parties' cross motions for summary judgments, as

well as the corresponding briefs, Responses, and Replies. It has come to the Court's attention

that none of the foregoing documents have been created or filed in accordance with the Local

Rules of this Court. Failure to comply with the local rules will result in the Court striking

the document.

LRCiv 7.1(c) provides:

(c) Electronic Documents. Documents submitted for filing in the ECF System

shall be in a Portable Document Format (PDF). Documents which exist only

in paper format shall be scanned into PDF for electronic filing. All other

documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing

program (e.g., Microsoft Word® or Corel WordPerfect®), rather than created

from the scanned image of a paper document. 

LRCivP 7.1(c). 

The reason behind this rule is not arbitrary. In order for CM/ECF to function at its

highest potential and for Chambers to perform efficiently and productively, the documents

Case 2:06-cv-01592-SMM Document 43 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

filed with the Court must be created using a word processing program and must conform to

the Rules of the Court . 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

(Doc. 26) is hereby struck from the record, with leave to re-file in accordance with the Local

Rules of the Untied States District Court for the District of Arizona.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary

Judgment (Doc. 35) is struck from the record with leave to re-file in accordance with the

Local Rules of the Untied States District Court for the District of Arizona.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all corresponding briefs, Responses, and Replies

(Doc. 27),(Doc. 28),(Docs. 35),(Doc. 36),(Doc. 40),(Doc. 41),(Doc. 42) are struck from the

record with leave to re-file in accordance with the Local Rules of the Untied States District

Court for the District of Arizona.

It IS FURTHER ORDERED that all motions struck herein shall be re-filed in

accordance with the Local Rules no later than Friday, June 1, 2007.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-01592-SMM Document 43 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 2