Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01072/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01072-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER CONDEE,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

C/O CASTILLO, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:14-cv-01072-DAD-EPG-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

TO DISMISS CASE, WITH PREJUDICE,

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

(ECF No. 11.) 

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN THIRTY 

(30) DAYS

Christopher Condee (“Plaintiff”) is a jail inmate proceeding pro se with this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on 

July 9, 2014. (ECF No. 1.) On February 12, 2015, the Court dismissed the Complaint for 

failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 10.) On March 5, 2015, Plaintiff filed 

the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 11.)

On March 30, 2016, the Court screened the First Amended Complaint and found that it 

fails to state a claim as to any defendant. (ECF No. 14.) The Court issued an order requiring 

Plaintiff to either file a Second Amended Complaint or notify the Court that he stands on the 

First Amended Complaint as filed, subject to recommendation of dismissal, within thirty days. 

(Id.) The thirty-day period has now expired, and Plaintiff has not filed a Second Amended 

Complaint, notified the Court that he stands on the First Amended Complaint, or otherwise 

Case 1:14-cv-01072-DAD-EPG Document 15 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

responded to the Court’s order.1 As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any 

claims upon which relief may be granted. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A 

and 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e), this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff=s failure 

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section 1983, and that this dismissal be 

subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658 

F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(l). Within thirty 

(30) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file 

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to 

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. 

Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 

(9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 6, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

1 The United States Postal Service returned the Court’s order on April 20, 2016 as undeliverable. 

A notation on the envelope indicates “Undeliverable, Released.” However, Plaintiff has not notified the Court of 

any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 

182(f). 

Case 1:14-cv-01072-DAD-EPG Document 15 Filed 05/09/16 Page 2 of 2