Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04449/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04449-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 751
Nature of Suit: Labor - Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

Dated; 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

other requested deadline 4 months from date of orde to ADR 

Dated: 0L08.15 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARIA DELA VEGA 

Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

SEES CANDIES, INC., 

a California corporation , 

Defendant(s). 

CASE NO. 4:14-ev-04449-JST 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

''counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR. and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the: following ADR process: 

t Processes: 

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

Mediation (ADR. L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who belieVe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instecuifile a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Coufrence. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Mivate Process:. 

Private ADR (please identi prOcess and provider) Private mediation; 

the parties anticipate using private mediator Jeffrey Ross 

The parties agree to hold the ADR.session by: 

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise orde ) 

Co 

r 

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE 

Case 3:14-cv-04449-JST Document 19 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER 

n The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. n The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." 

Rev. 12/11 

Page 2 of 2 

XXJanuary 12, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-04449-JST Document 19 Filed 01/12/15 Page 2 of 2