Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01674/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01674-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Banco D. Young,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-03-1674 MCE CMK P

vs.

Joe McGrath, et al.,

Respondants.

 / ORDER

On August 12, 2005, petitioner filed a “Memorandum of Points and Authorities in

Support of Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.” This motion contained a

request for an evidentiary hearing. Petitioner is advised that on July 18, 2005, the court ordered

that petitioner’s motion requesting leave to file a second amended habeas petition be placed in

the file and disregarded due to petitioner’s failure to properly serve the motion on respondents. 

Petitioner’s August 12, 2005 filing appears to be a second attempt to file a second amended

habeas petition. 

Although petitioner filled out a proof of service for his August 12, 2005 filing,

petitioner did not properly fill out the form. Petitioner left blank the space indicating the address

at which he served his “Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Second Amended

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.” Every document submitted conventionally to the court (e.g.

by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate stating the date that an accurate copy

Case 2:03-cv-01674-MCE -CMK Document 33 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

of the document was mailed to respondent or his attorney and the address to which it was mailed. 

As petitioner did not include the address to which he mailed the August 12, 2005 document, this

document was not properly served on respondent. 

Petitioner is advised that to properly serve respondent he must completely fill out

the proof of service form, including the address to which he mailed respondent or respondent’s

attorney a copy of his document. 

IT IS ORDERED THAT the petitioner’s August 12, 2005 “Memorandum of

Points and Authorities in Support of Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.” will

be placed in the court file and disregarded. The court notes that it appears that petitioner is

attempting to properly serve documents in this action, however, further failures to include a

proper certificate of service with filings may result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed. 

DATED: August 29, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-01674-MCE -CMK Document 33 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 2