Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03717/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03717-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS

TO ANSWER, RESPOND OR OTHERWISE PLEAD TO

THE COMPLAINT, CASE NO. C-06-3717-JSW 

Jeffrey S. Love (State Bar No. 195068) 

jeffrey.love@klarquist.com 

Klarquist Sparkman, LLP 

121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 

Portland, OR 97204-2988 

Telephone: (503) 595-5300 

Facsimile: (503) 595-5301 

Eric L. Wesenberg (State Bar No. 139696) 

ewesenberg@orrick.com 

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015 

Telephone: (650) 614-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, 

International Game Technology and IGT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES 

AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED and 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendants, 

v. 

INTERNATIONAL GAME 

TECHNOLOGY, 

Defendant. 

and IGT, 

Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff. 

Case No. C-06-3717-JSW 

STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME 

FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER, 

RESPOND OR OTHERWISE 

PLEAD TO THE COMPLAINT

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 8 Filed 06/30/2006 Page 1 of 2

AND ORDER

Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 23 Filed 08/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 1 - 

STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS

TO ANSWER, RESPOND OR OTHERWISE PLEAD TO

THE COMPLAINT, CASE NO. C-06-3717-JSW 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendants, IGT and International Game 

Technology, and Plaintiffs, Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited and Aristocrat 

Technologies, Inc., hereby stipulate that Defendants shall have a 25-day extension of time, to and 

including July 28, 2006, in which to answer, respond, or otherwise plead to the Plaintiffs’ 

Complaint. It is the intent and desire of the parties that this extension of time will not alter the 

date of any event or deadline already fixed by the Court. This is the first request for an extension 

made by either party in this matter. 

DATED: June 30, 2006 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 

By: / s / 

Eric L. Wesenberg (State Bar No. 139696) 

ewesenberg@orrick.com 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015 

Telephone: (650) 614-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 

Attorneys for Defendants 

International Game Technology and IGT 

DATED: June 30, 2006 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

By: / s / 

Anthony de Alcuaz 

adealcuaz@mwe.com 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, California 94041 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty 

Limited and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. 

Case 3:06-cv-03717-MJJ Document 8 Filed 06/30/2006 Page 2 of 2

8/14/2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 23 Filed 08/14/06 Page 2 of 2