Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01204/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01204-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:24-cv-01204-CDB

ORDER ON STIPULATIONS SETTING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE

(Docs. 14, 15)

On October 7, 2024, Plaintiff Jose Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing 

of a class action complaint against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”). (Doc. 1). 

Defendant executed its waiver of the service of summons on October 28, 2024, and must file its 

responsive pleading by December 24, 2024. (Doc. 4). An initial scheduling conference is set for 

January 8, 2025, at 9:30 AM before the undersigned. (Doc. 3).

Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulations to set a briefing and hearing schedule 

on Defendant’s anticipated motion to dismiss and to continue the scheduling conference and 

related deadlines pending determination of the motion. (Docs. 14, 15). The parties represent 

that granting the relief requested will preserve the resources of the parties and the Court while 

Defendant’s motion to dismiss is pending. (Id.).

///

///

Case 1:24-cv-01204-CDB Document 16 Filed 12/12/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In light of the parties’ stipulated representations and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED:

1. Defendant shall file any motion to dismiss on or before December 24, 2024;

2. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to any motion to dismiss by Defendant on or 

before January 21, 2025;

3. Defendant shall file any reply to Plaintiff’s opposition on or before February 7, 

2025;

4. Defendant shall notice any motion to dismiss for hearing according to Local Rule 

230(b); and

5. The January 8, 2025, scheduling conference (Doc. 2) is HEREBY VACATED to 

be reset as appropriate following disposition of Defendant’s anticipated motion 

to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2024 ___________________ _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:24-cv-01204-CDB Document 16 Filed 12/12/24 Page 2 of 2