Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01974/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01974-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES W. OLIVER,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2: 13-cv-1974 GEB KJN P

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On September 27, 2016, the undersigned recommended that defendant’s motion to dismiss 

be denied. (ECF No. 43.) On October 7, 2016, these findings and recommendations were 

returned unserved on plaintiff. On October 18, 2016, the undersigned granted defendant’s motion 

for an extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 46.) 

On October 28, 2016, this order was also returned unserved on plaintiff. The September 27, 2016 

findings and recommendations and October 18, 2016 order were served on plaintiff’s address of 

record. 

It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a 

party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. It is the plaintiff’s 

responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local 

Case 2:13-cv-01974-GEB-KJN Document 47 Filed 12/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that September 27, 2016 findings and

recommendations are vacated; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice based 

on plaintiff’s failure to comply with Local Rule 183(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: December 6, 2016

Ol1974.nca

Case 2:13-cv-01974-GEB-KJN Document 47 Filed 12/07/16 Page 2 of 2