Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-04641/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-04641-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

A

T

F

Ma

cos

def

co

Fe

file

tha

filin

Da

LFRED LA

v. 

HE CITY &

RANCISCO

On Ma

arch 28, 20

sts in the a

On Ap

fendants’ b

nstrues pla

deral Rule 

e an opposi

an April 29

ngs shall be

IT IS S

ated: April 2

N

M, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

& COUNTY 

O, et al., 

Defendan

arch 14, 201

16, plaintiff

mount of $2

ril 21, 2016

bill of cost.” 

intiffs’ filing

of Civil Pro

tion and pla

, 2016, and

e limited to 

SO ORDER

22, 2016 

UNITED 

NORTHER

OF SAN 

ts. 

16, defenda

fs timely file

20,294.05. 

6, plaintiffs f

 See Dkt. 2

g as a motio

ocedure 54(

aintiff to file

d plaintiff’s r

ten (10) pa

RED. 

STATES D

RN DISTRIC

ant timely fi

ed objection

 

filed a “noti

217. Althou

on seeking 

(d)(1). Acc

e a reply. D

reply shall b

ages. 

__

PH

Un

DISTRICT C

CT OF CAL

Case No.

ORDER S

SCHEDUL

TAXATIO

led a bill of

ns, and on A

ce of motio

ugh styled a

review of th

cordingly, th

Defendant’s

be filed no 

__________

HYLLIS J. H

nited States

COURT 

LIFORNIA 

10-cv-4641

SETTING B

LE FOR MO

ON OF COS

f costs, see

April 14, 20

on and moti

as “objectio

he clerk’s ta

he court will

s opposition

later than M

__________

HAMILTON

s District Ju

1-PJH 

BRIEFING 

OTION TO 

STS 

eking $22,33

016, the cle

on objectio

ons,” the co

axation of c

l allow defe

n shall be fil

May 9, 201

__________

udge 

REVIEW 

34.76. On 

erk taxed 

ons to 

ourt 

costs under

endant to 

led no later

6. Both 

_______ 

r

r

Case 4:10-cv-04641-PJH Document 218 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 1