Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-02041/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-02041-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff William King is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions 

Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison 

Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). 

On February 27, 2015, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim 

under section 1983 and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 

1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or 

otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any 

claims upon which relief may be granted. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED, with 

prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section 

1983. 

WILLIAM KING,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ANDREY KING, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:4-cv-02041-AWI-SAB (PC)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE 

CLAIM FOR RELIEF 

[ECF No. 9]

Case 1:14-cv-02041-AWI-SAB Document 11 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This Findings and Recommendation will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days 

after being served with this Findings and Recommendation, Plaintiff may file written objections with 

the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 

Recommendation.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may 

result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)

(citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 16, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-02041-AWI-SAB Document 11 Filed 04/16/15 Page 2 of 2