Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02295/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02295-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Krenn v. County of Santa Clara - CV 07-02295 JW PVT

Stip re [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint 1

Geri Lynn Green, (State Bar No. 127709)

LAW OFFICES OF GERI LYNN GREEN, LC

700 Montgomery Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 982-2600

Facsimile: (415) 358-4562

Email: gerigreen@earthlink.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ESTHER KRENN and ESTATE OF 

LUIS ANDREW MARTINEZ By and 

Through his Administratrix, ESTHER KRENN.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ESTHER KRENN and ESTATE OF LUIS

ANDREW MARTINEZ, By and Through his

Administratrix, ESTHER KRENN 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA; et. al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CV 07-02295 JW PVT

STIPULATION AND

(PROPOSED) ORDER TO

ALLOW FILING OF THE

PROPOSED SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

ENLARGING RESPONSE TIME

[FED. CIVIL L.R. 6-1(B), 6-2,

AND/OR 7-12]

The parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to the

filing of Plaintiffs’ Proposed Second Amended Complaint (attached hereto) as of today’s date

October 22, 2007, and to enlarge Defendants’ time for filing their responsive pleading to November

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge James Ware

10/26/2007 XXXXXXXX

Case 5:07-cv-02295-JW Document 24 Filed 10/26/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Krenn v. County of Santa Clara - CV 07-02295 JW PVT

Stip re [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint 2

11, 2007. Presently the date for Defendants to file their responsive pleading to the First Amended

Complaint is October 19, 2007 pursuant to previous stipulation of the parties which enlarged

Defendants’ time for filing their responsive pleadings. The parties now stipulate and agree to

relieve Defendants of the filing a responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint and instead

allow for the filing of a Second Amended Complaint and to provide Defendants with 20 days in

which to respond.

The other administrative dates will remain fixed as ordered by the court, as follows:

Event Current Date Proposed Date

Complaint Filed April 27, 2007 N/A

First Amended Complaint Filed June 13, 2007 N/A

Pursuant to Stipulation Response Date October 19, 2007 (Nov. 11, 2007 if Second

Amended Complaint is

ordered filed Oct. 18,

2007))

By Stipulation Second Amended Complaint October 22, 2007

to be Filed October 18, 2007

Pursuant to Proposed Nunc Pro Tunc

Order of the Court

Stipulation Extending Time For November 11, 2007

Defendants To File Responsive

Pleading Filed

Waivers / Proofs of Service Filed for FAC August 27, 2007 N/A

Defendants’ Declination To Proceed September 5, 2007 N/A

Before U.S. Magistrate Judge Filed

Clerk’s Notice of Impending September 6, 2007 N/A

Reassignment Issued

Reassignment Order Issued September 6, 2007 N/A

Response to Complaint Due October 19, 2007 Nov. 11, 2007

Last Date to Meet and Confer October 18, 2007 N/A

Regarding Initial Disclosures, Early 

13 1313

Case 5:07-cv-02295-JW Document 24 Filed 10/26/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Krenn v. County of Santa Clara - CV 07-02295 JW PVT

Stip re [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint 3

Settlement, ADR Process, and 

Discovery

Last Date to File Rule 26(f) Report, October 26, 2007 N/A

Initial Disclosures, and Joint Case 

Management Conference Statement

Initial Case Management Conference November 19, 2007 N/A

at 10:00 a.m.

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a

“conformed” signature ( /S/ ) within this e-filed document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: Oc LC tober 18, 2007 THE LAW OFFICES OF GERI LYNN GREEN

 By: /S/ 

 GERI LYNN GREEN

 Attorney for Plaintiffs

DATED: October 22, 2007 ANN MILLER RAVEL

County Counsel

 By: /S/ 

GREGORY J. SEBASTINELLI

Deputy County Counsel

Attorneys for Defendants

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated:____________________ ______________________________

Honorable James Ware

United State District Court Judge

\\G r eenla w se rv \G e ri G r een\G e ri's D ocum ents\C L IEN T S \k r enn\k r enn stip for sac FIN A L 10 -2 2 .w p d

as modified by the Court. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge James Ware

October 26, 2007

Case 5:07-cv-02295-JW Document 24 Filed 10/26/07 Page 3 of 3