Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02023/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02023-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FETTERMAN,

Plaintiff,

v

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,

INC, et al,

Defendants. /

No C 06-2023 VRW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendant Bank of America filed a motion for summary

judgment on April 5, 2007. Doc #45. Per the court’s order of

March 8, 2007 (Doc #41), this motion was to be heard on May 10,

2007. The court later continued the motion hearing to June 21,

2007. Doc #51. Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. Bank

of America has put plaintiff on notice that failure to respond to

the motion may result in the case being dismissed as to Bank of

America. Doc #56. 

Case 3:06-cv-02023-VRW Document 58 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the June 21, 2007 hearing on Bank of

America’s motion is VACATED and plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE

in writing by June 15, 2007, why defendant Bank of America’s motion

should not be treated as unopposed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:06-cv-02023-VRW Document 58 Filed 06/06/07 Page 2 of 2