Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04827/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04827-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Petitioner was apparently removed from the country even before his counsel, Viney Gupta,

filed his motion for admission to the bar of this Court pro hac vice. 

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GURMEET SINGH,

Petitioner,

 v.

U.S. SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT

OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., 

Respondents. /

No. C 09-4827 SI

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS

MOOT

On January 4, 2010, respondents filed a return stating that petitioner was removed from the

United States on October 28, 2009.1 Accordingly, it appears that this petition for writ of habeas corpus,

which challenges petitioner’s detention in immigration custody, is moot. Petitioner is hereby

ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing no later than January 20, 2010, why this petition should

not be dismissed as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-04827-SI Document 10 Filed 01/13/10 Page 1 of 1