Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-280/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO FILE MDL No. 1917 

MOTION TO COMPEL TARGET TO RESPOND TO CERTAIN OF DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY REQUESTS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(Stipulating Parties Listed on Signature Pages) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Target Corp., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., Case 

No. 3:11-CV-05514-SC 

Master File No. 3:07-cv-05944-SC

MDL No. 1917 

Individual Case No. 3:11-cv-05514 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE 

TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL 

TARGET TO RESPOND TO CERTAIN 

DEFENDANT DISCOVERY REQUESTS

 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2879 Filed 10/02/14 Page 1 of 4
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO FILE MDL No. 1917 

MOTION TO COMPEL TARGET TO RESPOND TO CERTAIN OF DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY REQUESTS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending the Deadline to File Motion to Compel 

Target to Respond to Certain of Defendants’ Discovery Requests between defendant Panasonic 

Corporation (“Panasonic”), on the one hand, and plaintiff Target Corporation (“Target”), on the 

other hand, is made with respect to the following facts and recitals: 

WHEREAS, on March 21, 2014, the Court entered a scheduling order setting the close of 

fact discovery for September 5, 2014. See Dkt. No. 2459; 

WHEREAS, the deadline to file any motion to compel after the discover cut-off is 

September 12, 2014 (L.R. 37-3); 

WHEREAS, on April 11, 2014, defendants Panasonic and LG Electronics, Inc. served their 

Second Set of Interrogatories on Target (“Panasonic’s Second Interrogatories”); 

WHEREAS, on May 15, 2014, Target served its Responses to Panasonic’s Second 

Interrogatories; 

WHEREAS, on July 21, 2014, defendants Philips Electronics North America Corporation 

and Toshiba Corporation served their First Set of Interrogatories on Target (“PENAC 

Interrogatories”); 

WHEREAS, on August 25, 2014, Target served its Responses to the PENAC Interrogatories; 

WHEREAS, on September 9, 2014, counsel for the undersigned parties conferred in good 

faith and agreed that Target will serve supplemental objections and responses to (i) Panasonic’s 

Second Interrogatories Nos. 20 (g) and (h) and 24, and (ii) PENAC Interrogatories No. 9; 

WHEREAS, Panasonic and Target have conferred by and through their counsel and, subject 

to the Court’s approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

1. Target will serve revised responses to (i) Panasonic’s Second Interrogatories Nos. 20 

(g) and (h) and 24 and (ii) PENAC Interrogatories No. 9 by September 19, 2014. 

2. The undersigned parties agree to extend the deadline to file a motion to compel 

relating to Target's revised responses to the named discovery requests, to the extent 

one is deemed necessary by Panasonic, to September 26, 2014. 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2879 Filed 10/02/14 Page 2 of 4
3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO FILE MDL No. 1917 

MOTION TO COMPEL TARGET TO RESPOND TO CERTAIN OF DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY REQUESTS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________ _____________________________________ 

Hon. Samuel Conti 

United States District Court Judge 

Date: September 12, 2014 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

By: /s/ Adam C. Hemlock 

DAVID L. YOHAI (pro hac vice) 

Email: david.yohai@weil.com 

ADAM C. HEMLOCK (pro hac vice) 

Email: adam.hemlock@weil.com 

DAVID E. YOLKUT (pro hac vice) 

Email: david.yolkut@weil.com 

LARA E. VEBLEN TRAGER (pro hac vice) 

Email: lara.trager@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, New York 10153-0119 

Telephone: (212) 310-8000 

Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 

JEFFREY L. KESSLER (pro hac vice) 

Email: jkessler@winston.com 

EVA W. COLE (pro hac vice) 

Email: ewcole@winston.com 

MOLLY M. DONOVAN (pro hac vice) 

Email: mmdonovan@winston.com 

ALDO A. BADINI (257086) 

Email: abadini@winston.com 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

200 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10166-4193 

Telephone: (212) 294-6700 

Facsimile: (212) 294-4700 

Attorneys for Defendant Panasonic Corporation 

October 2, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2879 Filed 10/02/14 Page 3 of 4
4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO FILE MDL No. 1917 

MOTION TO COMPEL TARGET TO RESPOND TO CERTAIN OF DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY REQUESTS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

By: /s/ Astor H.L. Heaven 

 Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) 

Robert B. McNary (CA Bar No. 253745) 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

515 South Flower St., 40th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: 213-443-5582 

Facsimile: 213-622-2690 

Email: jmurray@crowell.com 

 rmcnary@crowell.com 

Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) 

Astor H.L. Heaven (pro hac vice) 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Telephone: 202-624-2500 

Facsimile: 202-628-5116 

Email: jmurphy@crowell.com 

 aheaven@crowell.com 

Counsel for Target Corp. and ViewSonic Corp. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2879 Filed 10/02/14 Page 4 of 4