Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00054/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00054-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEN ROBINSON, et al., CASE NO. CV-F-05-1258 REC LJO

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR TO

vs. PAY FILING FEE

JOHN SNOW, Secretary of Treasury,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

On October 4, 2005, plaintiff Ken Robinson (“Mr. Robinson”) and others filed a lengthy,

rambling and indecipherable document which this Court construes as a complaint. Mr. Robinson also

filed an Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (“in forma pauperis

application”). With its October 7, 2005 order, this Court struck the complaint because it was not signed

by all apparent plaintiffs.

On October 17, 2005, Mr. Robinson and others filed a lengthy, rambling and indecipherable

document which this Court construes as a complaint to comply with the October 7, 2005 order. Neither

Mr. Robinson nor the other purported plaintiffs have paid the $250 filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §

1915(a)(2). Only Mr. Robinson has submitted an in forma pauperis application. This Court is unable

to determine whether the other plaintiffs must pay the $250 filing fee or may proceed in forma pauperis.

On the basis good cause, this Court GRANTS plaintiffs, other than Mr. Robinson, up to October

28, 2005 to pay the $250 filing fee or to submit fully completed in forma pauperis applications to

Case 1:11-cv-00054-LJO -SKO Document 9 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

demonstrate they are entitled to proceed without prepayment of fees. Failure to timely comply with

this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss this action. This Court will take no action

on plaintiffs’ claims until plaintiffs comply with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 18, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00054-LJO -SKO Document 9 Filed 10/19/05 Page 2 of 2