Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02907/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02907-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

JOINT MOTION TO STAY 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

VICTOR JIH, State Bar No. 186515

 vjih@omm.com 

ASHLEY PEARSON, State Bar No. 281223 

 apearson@omm.com 

HILARY LEEWONG, State Bar No. 294297 

 hleewong@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

1999 Avenue of the Stars 

Los Angeles, California 90067-6035 

Telephone: (310) 553-6700 

Facsimile: (310) 246-6779 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Jamisi Jermaine Calloway 

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 

Attorney General of California 

SYLVIE P. SNYDER, State Bar No. 171187 

Deputy Attorney General 

MICHELLE DES JARDINS, State Bar No. 168079 

Supervising Deputy Attorney General 

110 West “A” Street, Suite 1100 

San Diego, CA 92101 

P.O. Box 85266 

San Diego, CA 92186-5266 

Telephone: (619) 645-2295 

Facsimile: (619) 645-2581 

E-mail: Michelle.DesJardins@doj.ca.gov 

Attorneys for Defendants M. Veal and Alicia Terry, 

Administrator of the Estate of Raymond Andreasen, 

M.D.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

M. VEAL, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:09-cv-2907-GEB-EFB P

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

JOINT MOTION TO STAY 

PROCEEDINGS FOR 60 DAYS 

PENDING SETTLEMENT 

DISCUSSIONS 

Case 2:09-cv-02907-GEB-EFB Document 91 Filed 04/10/15 Page 1 of 2
- 1 - [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

JOINT MOTION TO STAY 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[Proposed] Order 

Having considered the parties’ Joint Motion To Stay Proceedings For 60 

Days Pending Settlement Discussions, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is 

GRANTED. 

The above-captioned case is stayed for 60 days from the entry of this Order. 

On the expiration of the stay, if the parties have not reached a settlement agreement, 

they shall submit a proposed scheduling order setting forth proposed dates for all 

remaining deadlines in the case. Should the parties settle the case prior to the 

expiration of the stay, they shall so inform the Court by filing a request for 

dismissal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this ___ day of April, 2015. 

_________________________________ 

The Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

Judge, United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of California 

Case 2:09-cv-02907-GEB-EFB Document 91 Filed 04/10/15 Page 2 of 2