Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00522/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00522-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Page 1 of 3

Beverly Dove v. State of California, et al. USDC, Eastern District, Case No. CIV.S-04-522 LKK/DAD

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN

Mark E. Merin, SBN 043849

Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild, SBN 192086

2001 P Street, Suite 100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 443-6911

Facsimile: (916) 447-8336

E-Mail: office@markmerin.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

---o0o---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

---o0o---

BEVERLY DOVE,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA

HIGHWAY PATROL, COMMISSIONER D.O.

HELMICH, SACRAMENTO COUNTY;

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S

DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF LOU BLANAS,

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO

CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF

POLICE ALBERT NAJERA, and DOES I

through XXX, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CIV.S-04-522 LKK/DAD

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

BY STIPULATION OF DEFENDANTS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA

HIGHWAY PATROL, COMMISSIONER D.O.

HELMICH, SACRAMENTO COUNTY,

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S

DEPARTMENT, AND SACRAMENTO

COUNTY SHERIFF LOU BLANAS [FRCP

Rule 41(a)]; and ORDER

It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto that the following parties only may be

dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs:

C STATE OF CALIFORNIA

C CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL

C COMMISSIONER D.O. HELMICH

C SACRAMENTO COUNTY

Case 2:04-cv-00522-LKK -DAD Document 54 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Page 2 of 3

Beverly Dove v. State of California, et al. USDC, Eastern District, Case No. CIV.S-04-522 LKK/DAD

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

C SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

C SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF LOU BLANAS

Dated: October 27, 2005 Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF MARK E. MERIN

/s/ - “Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild”

By: 

JEFFREY I. SCHWARZSCHILD, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: October 26, 2005 Respectfully submitted,

SAMUEL L. JACKSON CITY ATTORNEY

CITY OF SACRAMENTO

/s/ - “Gerald C. Hicks”

By: 

GERALD C. HICKS

Sr. Deputy City Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF SACRAMENTO

SACRAMENTO CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 

and CHIEF OF POLICE ALBERT NAJERA

Dated: October 21, 2005 Respectfully submitted,

BILL LOCKYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

/s/ - “Stephen J. Egan”

By: 

STEPHEN J. EGAN, Deputy Attorney

GARY A. BINKERD, Deputy Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL and

COMMISSIONER D.O. HELMICH

Dated: October 24, 2005 Respectfully submitted,

PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

/s/ - “Keith E. Nourot”

By: 

KEITH E. NOUROT, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF 

SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT and SACRAMENTO

 COUNTY SHERIFF LOU BLANAS

Case 2:04-cv-00522-LKK -DAD Document 54 Filed 11/10/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Page 3 of 3

Beverly Dove v. State of California, et al. USDC, Eastern District, Case No. CIV.S-04-522 LKK/DAD

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA

HIGHWAY PATROL, COMMISSIONER D.O. HELMICH, SACRAMENTO COUNTY,

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, AND SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF

LOU BLANAS may be, and are hereby, dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs.

Dated: November 9, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-00522-LKK -DAD Document 54 Filed 11/10/05 Page 3 of 3