Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01330/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01330-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

Case No.:15-cv-01330-NC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM TEMPLE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.15-cv-01330-NC 

TENTATIVE RULING ON 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 43, 45

The Court has reviewed the defendants’ motions to dismiss and tentatively finds 

that the facts alleged in the first amended complaint, Dkt. No. 32, are not sufficient to state 

a claim under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6) on all causes of action. 

The Court already addressed the causes of action in dismissing the original complaint and 

now notes that very few additional facts were added to the first amended complaint. See

Dkt. No. 26. Therefore, at the hearing, the plaintiffs should be prepared to proffer 

additional facts to demonstrate that amendment would not be futile. Specifically, plaintiffs 

should be prepared to address with specificity, what other options did the Temples forgo in 

reliance on defendants’ promises to review the Temples’ loan modification application. 

Additionally, the first amended complaint states that defendants will move forward with a 

foreclosure sale on February 24, 2015. Did the sale occur?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 5, 2015 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:15-cv-01330-NC Document 59 Filed 10/05/15 Page 1 of 1