Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01010/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01010-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELIEZER CHAVEZ GARIBAY

aka JOSE LUIS MAGANA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1010 RRB JFM P

vs.

DR. SANDRA M. HAND, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking

relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 2, 2007 and November 29, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings

and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days.

Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copies of the findings and

recommendations were returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to

keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service

of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

Case 2:05-cv-01010-RRB -JFM Document 70 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 2, 2007 and November 29,

2007, are adopted in full. 

2. Defendants’ August 10, 2007 motion to dismiss and/or for terminating sanctions

is denied without prejudice.

3. This action is dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his

current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f) and 11-110.

ENTERED this 9th day of January, 2008.

S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:05-cv-01010-RRB -JFM Document 70 Filed 01/10/08 Page 2 of 2