Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01277/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01277-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF 

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION

EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND

RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

Morgan Chu (70446) (mchu@irell.com) 

Samuel K. Lu (171969) (slu@irell.com) 

Talin Gordnia (274213) (tgordnia@irell.com) 

1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 

Los Angeles, California 90067-4276 

Telephone: (310) 277-1010 

Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LAM RESEARCH CORP. 

STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD. 

George Summerfield 

(Summerfield@StadheimGrear.com) 

400 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2200 

Chicago, IL 60611 

Telephone: (312) 755-4400 

Facsimile: (312) 755-4408 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DANIEL L. FLAMM 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

LAM RESEARCH CORP., 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

DANIEL L. FLAMM, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF 

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR 

PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO 

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, 

DKT. NO. 24, AND RESCHEDULING 

HEARING DATE

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 5:15-cv-01277-BLF Document 29 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF - 2 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION

EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND

RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Lam Research Corporation ("Lam"), and Defendant 

Daniel L. Flamm ("Flamm"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as 

follows: 

WHEREAS Lam filed the complaint in the above-captioned case on March 18, 2015, Dkt. 

No. 1 ("the Complaint"); 

WHEREAS, on May 15, 2015, counsel for Lam effectuated service of the Complaint, 

Summons, and documents required by Civil L.R. 4-2 on counsel for Flamm through electronic 

mail; 

WHEREAS, on May 22, 2015, this Court entered an Order Approving Stipulation to 

Extend Time for Defendant to Answer Complaint and to Continue Case Management Conference; 

Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines; 

WHEREAS, the Court's May 22, 2015 order approved, inter alia, the parties' stipulation to 

extend the time for Flamm to answer the Complaint to July 14, 2015; 

WHEREAS, on July 14, 2015, this Court entered an Order Approving Stipulation to 

Extend Time for Defendant to answer the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, the Court's July 14, 2015 order approved the parties' stipulation to extend the 

time for Flamm to answer the Complaint to July 21, 2015; 

WHEREAS, the Court's July 14, 2015 order did not alter any other deadlines in the 

schedule, including those set by the Court's Order of May 22, 2015; 

WHEREAS, Flamm has not answered the Complaint as of the filing of this stipulation; 

WHEREAS, on July 21, 2015, Flamm filed a motion captioned "Motion and Memorandum 

In Support of Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement," ("Motion 

to Dismiss"), Dkt. No. 24; 

WHEREAS, under Civil L.R. 7-3, the deadline for Lam to file an opposition to the Motion 

to Dismiss is August 4, 2015, and the deadline for Flamm to file a reply in support of the Motion 

to Dismiss is August 11, 2015; 

WHEREAS, the hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss is currently scheduled for 

September 17, 2015; 

Case 5:15-cv-01277-BLF Document 29 Filed 07/27/15 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF - 3 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION

EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND

RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties conferred, agreed and stipulated to ask 

the Court to extend the deadline for Lam to file an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss to 

September 1, 2015; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties conferred, agreed and stipulated to ask 

the Court to extend the deadline for Flamm to file a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss to 

September 15, 2015; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties conferred, agreed and stipulated to ask 

the Court to reschedule the hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss to November 12, 2015 because 

Lam's counsel is not available to attend the hearing on September 17, 2015; 

WHEREAS, the parties' requested time modification does not affect any other deadline in 

the schedule, including those set by the Court's Order of May 22, 2015; 

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, Lam and Flamm, by and 

through their respective counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

The deadline for Lam to file an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be extended to 

September 1, 2015, the deadline for Lam to file a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss shall 

be extended to September 15, 2015, and the hearing for the Motion to Dismiss shall be 

rescheduled to November 12, 2015. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Dated: July 27, 2015 

Respectfully submitted, 

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

By: /s/ Talin Gordnia 

 Talin Gordnia 

Morgan Chu (70446) (mchu@irell.com) 

Samuel K. Lu (171969) (slu@irell.com) 

Talin Gordnia (274213) (tgordnia@irell.com) 

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 

Los Angeles, California 90067-4276 

Telephone: (310) 277-1010 

Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Lam Research Corp. 

Case 5:15-cv-01277-BLF Document 29 Filed 07/27/15 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF - 4 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION

EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND

RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE

Dated: July 27, 2015 

Respectfully submitted, 

STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD. 

By: /s/ George Summerfield (by permission) 

 George Summerfield 

George Summerfield (Summerfield@StadheimGrear.com) 

STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD. 

400 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2200 

Chicago, IL 60611 

Telephone: (312) 755-4400 

Facsimile: (312) 755-4408 

Attorneys for Defendant Daniel L. Flamm 

Case 5:15-cv-01277-BLF Document 29 Filed 07/27/15 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF 

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION

EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND

RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: _______________, 2015 By:___________________________ 

 BETH LABSON FREEMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

July 27, 2015

Case 5:15-cv-01277-BLF Document 29 Filed 07/27/15 Page 5 of 5