Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04578/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04578-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

EXTENSION TO ANSWER THE SAC

CASE NO. C-07-4578 SI 

TERRY T. JOHNSON, State Bar No. 121569 (tjohnson@wsgr.com) 

BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838 (boris.feldman@wsgr.com) 

BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR, State Bar No. 203244 (bnoor@wsgr.com) 

CHERYL W. FOUNG, State Bar No. 108868 (cfoung@wsgr.com) 

BRYAN J. KETROSER, State Bar No 239105 (bketroser@wsgr.com) 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UTSTARCOM, INC., HONG LIANG LU, 

YING WU, MICHAEL SOPHIE, THOMAS TOY, 

and FRANCIS BARTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PETER RUDOLPH, individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

UTSTARCOM, INC., HONG LIANG LU, YING 

WU, MICHAEL SOPHIE, THOMAS TOY, and 

FRANCIS BARTON, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C-07-4578 SI 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER 

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED 

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Before: Hon. Susan Illston 

Case 3:07-cv-04578-SI Document 89 Filed 09/03/2008 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-04578-SI Document 90 Filed 09/04/08 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

EXTENSION TO ANSWER THE SAC

CASE NO. C-07-4578 SI 

 -1- 

WHEREAS, on May 16, 2008 plaintiff filed his Second Amended Class Action 

Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Law (“Second Amended Complaint”); 

WHEREAS, on August 21, 2008 the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, on August 22, 2008 the Court issued civil pretrial minutes continuing this 

matter to November 7, 2008 for a Further Case Management Conference; 

WHEREAS, Defendants have filed a Motion to Relate with the Honorable James Ware to 

consolidate this matter with the matter In re UTStarcom, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 04-

4908-JW (PVT); 

WHEREAS, it is the parties’ understanding that the Court wished to suspend activity in 

this case until after the next Case Management Conference scheduled for November 7, 2008; 

WHEREAS, counsel for plaintiff and defendants have met and conferred and have agreed 

that, in order to prevent any confusion or ambiguity regarding pending deadlines, they would 

formally stipulate to the extension set forth below for defendants to answer the Second Amended 

Complaint;

WHEREAS, the parties therefore stipulate that defendants shall answer the Second 

Amended Complaint by November 17, 2008, which is ten (10) days after the Case Management 

Conference set for November 7, 2008: 

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and subject to the Court’s 

approval:

(a) Defendants shall answer the Second Amended Complaint on or before November 

17, 2008; 

Case 3:07-cv-04578-SI Document 89 Filed 09/03/2008 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-04578-SI Document 90 Filed 09/04/08 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

EXTENSION TO ANSWER THE SAC

CASE NO. C-07-4578 SI

-2-

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: September 3, 2008 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR 

 BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR 

Attorneys for Defendants

UTSTARCOM, INC., HONG LIANG LU, 

YING WU,1

 MICHAEL SOPHIE, THOMAS 

TOY, and FRANCIS BARTON 

Dated: September 3, 2008 FINKELSTEIN, THOMPSON LLP 

By: /s/ DONALD J. ENRIGHT 

 DONALD J. ENRIGHT 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 The Honorable Susan Illston 

 United States District Court Judge 

1

 Appearing specially herein without waiving objections to service of process or jurisdiction. 

Case 3:07-cv-04578-SI Document 89 Filed 09/03/2008 Page 3 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-04578-SI Document 90 Filed 09/04/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

EXTENSION TO ANSWER THE SAC

CASE NO. C-07-4578 SI

-3-

I, Bahram Seyedin-Noor, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being 

used to file the Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Extension of Time for 

Defendants to Answer Plaintiff’s Second Amended Class Action Complaint. I hereby attest that 

Donald J. Enright has concurred in this filing.

Dated: September 3, 2008 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR 

 BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR 

Attorneys for Defendants

UTSTARCOM, INC., HONG LIANG LU, 

YING WU, MICHAEL SOPHIE, THOMAS TOY, 

and FRANCIS BARTON 

Case 3:07-cv-04578-SI Document 89 Filed 09/03/2008 Page 4 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-04578-SI Document 90 Filed 09/04/08 Page 4 of 4