Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00976/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00976-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LENT N. KING, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

JENNIFER JONES, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00976-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 12)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff Lent N. King (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 8, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. To

date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:05-cv-00976-LJO -LJO Document 17 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 8, 2006, is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s complaint,

filed July 29, 2005, against defendants Jones, Terrell, Pear,

Halsey, and Sumaya for denial of access to the courts based on

their failure to facilitate his appearance for a court

proceeding;

3. Plaintiff’s denial of access to the courts claim

stemming from the inmate appeals process is DISMISSED for failure

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section

1983; and,

4. Defendants LaCrosse, Stockman, Anderson, Castell,

Watson, and Grannis are DISMISSED from this action based on

plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted against them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00976-LJO -LJO Document 17 Filed 06/27/06 Page 2 of 2