Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02441/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02441-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKA ALFARO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2441 LKK KJM PS

vs.

DENNY’S,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed November 26, 2007, plaintiff was ordered to file either a

completed application and affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis, or the

appropriate filing fee within twenty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The November 26th order was reserved on

plaintiff on December 5, 2007. The time period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded

to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:07-cv-02441-LKK -KJM Document 7 Filed 03/03/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 29, 2008. 

/alfa2441.fta

Case 2:07-cv-02441-LKK -KJM Document 7 Filed 03/03/08 Page 2 of 2