Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00173/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00173-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

I

2

3

4

5

6

7

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

A Limited Liability Partnership

Including Professional Corporations

MICHELLE D. KAHN, Cal. Bar No . 124528

MICHELLE J. HIRTH, Cal. Bar No. 200024

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4106

Telephone: 415-434-9100

Facsimile: 415-434-3947

Attorneys for Plaintiff

BARE ESCENTUALS, INC.

ROBERT L. SHERMAN (admitted pro hac vice)

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

75 East 55th Street

New York, NI' 10022-3205

Telephone: (212) 318-6000

Facsimile: (212) 318-6847

KEVIN C . McCANN (State Bar . No. 120874)

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

55 Second Street, 24th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105-3441

Telephone: (415) 856-7000

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100

Attorneys for Defendants

L'OREAL USA, INC. and LANCOME

PARFUMS ET BEAUTE & CIE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

SAN JOSE DIVISION

BARE ESCENTUALS, INC ., CASE NO . C04-0173 RMW

Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO WITHDRAWAL OF

V. LANCOME PARFUMS ET BEAUTE &

CIE'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR

L'OREAL USA, INC., LANCOME, a LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION

Divisiop of L'OREAL USA, INC . anc AND TO DISMISSAL OF LANCOME

LANCOME PARFUMS ET BEAUTE PARFUMS ET BEAUTE & CIE;

& CIE, [PROPOSED] ORDER

Defendants.

W02-SF:FHMI51457147 .1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED) ORDER

Case No. C 04-0173 RMW

Case 5:04-cv-00173-RMW Document 63 Filed 06/10/2005 Page 1 of 4

*E-FILED - 7/7/05*

XXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Case 5:04-cv-00173-RMW Document 66 Filed 07/07/05 Page 1 of 4
I

2

3

4

5

6

7

STIPULATION

This Stipulation to Withdrawal of Lanc6me Parfums et Beaute & Cie's

Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and to Dismissal of Lanc6me

Parfums et Beaute & Cie is entered into by plaintiff Bare Escentuals, Inc. ("Bare

Escentuals"), defendant L'Oreal USA, Inc . ("L'Oreal") and defendant Lanc6me Parfums et

Beaute & Cie ("Lanc6me") based on the following facts :

A. On June 29, 2004, Lanc6me filed a motion to dismiss this action as to

Lanc6me for lack of personal jurisdiction;

B. As Bare Escentuals and Lanc6me were attempting to informally

resolve Lancome's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and Bare Escentuals,

L'Oreal and Lanc6me were engaged in mediation before the Ninth Circuit Court of

Appeals Mediation Program, Bare Escentuals and Lanc6me stipulated to multiple

continuances of the hearing of Lanc6me's motion to dismiss;

C. Lanc6me's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is

currently scheduled for hearing on July 8, 2005 . Correspondingly, Bare Escentuals'

opposition to the motion to dismiss, if any, must be filed on or before June 17, 2005 and

Lanc6me's reply in support of its motion to dismiss, if any, must be filed on or before June

24, 2005; and

D. The parties have agreed to a dismissal without prejudice of Lanc6me

from this action .

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Bare Escentuals, L'Oreal

and Lanc6me, through their counsel of record, that:

1. Lancome withdraws its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal

Jurisdiction in this action;

2. Lanc6me Parfums et Beaute & Cie be dismissed as a party to this

action without prejudice ; and

3. Lancome enters into this Stipulation to Withdrawal of Lanc6me

Parfums et Beaute & Cie's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and t o

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C 04-0173 RAM

W02-SFTHW61457147.1 1

Case 5:04-cv-00173-RMW Document 66 Filed 07/07/05 Page 2 of 4
I

2

3

4

5

6

Dismissal of Lancome Parfums Et Beaute & Cie without prejudice to its position that this

Court does not have personal jurisdiction over Lancobme. This Stipulation to Withdrawal

OfLanc6me Parfums et Beaute & Cie's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal

Jurisdiction and to Dismissal of Lanc6me Parfums et Beaute & Cie should not be

construed as an appearance in this action for purposes of personal jurisdiction .

Dated: June/D , 2005

7 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

Dated: June 0, 2005

Michelle J. Hirt

Attorneys for Plaintiff

BARE ESCENTUALS, INC.

PAUL~HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

Robert L~'Sherman

Attorneys for Defendants

I. OREAL USA, INC. and

LANCOME PARFUMS ET BEAUTE & CIE

By

W02 -SF: FHM16 1 4 57 1 47 .1 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C 04-0173 RMW

Case 5:04-cv-00173-RMW Document 63 Filed 06/10/2005 Page 3 of 4
 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Case 5:04-cv-00173-RMW Document 66 Filed 07/07/05 Page 3 of 4
1

3

4

5

6

7

ORDER

Having reviewed the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, IT

IS ORDERED that: (1) Lancome Parfums et Beaute & Cie's Motion to Dismiss for Lack

of Personal Jurisdiction is withdrawn; (2) Lanc6me Parfums et Beaute & Cie is dismissed

from this action; and (3) the Stipulation to Withdrawal of Lancome Parfums et Beaute

& Cie's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and to Dismissal of

Lanc6me Parfums et Beaute & Cie is not deemed an appearance by Lanc6me Parfums

et Beaute & Cie before this Court for purposes of personal jurisdiction .

DATED: 32005

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Court Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No . C 04-0173 RMW

W02-SF :FHM161457147 .1 3

Case 5:04-cv-00173-RMW Document 63 Filed 06/10/2005 Page 4 of 4

7/7

/S/ RONALD M. WHYTE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Case 5:04-cv-00173-RMW Document 66 Filed 07/07/05 Page 4 of 4