Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-05232/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-05232-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1Defendants' counsel's request was improperly submitted to the court. It appears that the request was not filed with

the court and was mailed directly to this court's chambers and opposing counsel.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAN L. WHITNEY, JANET R. HADLEY,

MARGARET A. KORNOW-BROWN, ERIC

BRELLE,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CHARLES WURTZ, VERISCAPE, INC.,

RENEE TADLOCK, REGINA RYGELIS, WILL

ARNTZ, SAM JACOBS, GARY BERKOWITZ

and BRIAN ROE,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-04-05232 PVT

INTERIM ORDER RE DEFENDANTS'

COUNSEL'S REQUEST FOR

CONTINUANCE 

Counsel to defendants Charles Wurtz, Veriscape, Inc., Regina Rygelis, Gary

Berkowitz and Brian Rose (collectively "Defendants") has submitted a request to the court to

continue the noticed hearings on plaintiffs' application for writ of attachment and plaintiffs'

motions to compel discovery.1 Defendants' counsel seeks a four week continuance of all the

hearings because of his own illness. The hearing on the discovery matters is scheduled for

January 31, 2006 and the hearing on the writ of attachment is scheduled for February 7, 2006. 

Case 5:04-cv-05232-PVT Document 57 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 3
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

It is hereby ordered that plaintiffs inform the court no later than 3:00P.M. on Friday,

January 20, 2006 whether they intend to oppose counsel's request to continue the hearings.

It is further ordered that Defendants' counsel abide by the electronic filing

requirements and local rules of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 19, 2006 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 5:04-cv-05232-PVT Document 57 Filed 01/19/06 Page 2 of 3
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case 5:04-cv-05232-PVT Document 57 Filed 01/19/06 Page 3 of 3