Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03657/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03657-54/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MLC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-03657-SI 

ORDER DENYING MLC'S SECOND 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Re: Dkt. No. 558

MLC has filed a second motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of a portion of 

this Court’s Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Micron’s Motion to Strike Portions of the 

Lee Report.1 Specifically, MLC requests reconsideration of the portion of the order striking 

paragraph 212 of the Lee Report. MLC has not demonstrated that reconsideration is warranted. See 

generally Civ. L.R. 7-9(b). Accordingly, MLC’s motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2019 ______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

 

1

 Apropos of nothing relevant to the motion, MLC submitted as Exhibit A to the motion the 

parties’ extensive e-mail correspondence with Judge Corley’s chambers regarding scheduling the 

settlement conference in this case. This correspondence did not aid the Court in any way, and the 

Court finds that it is generally not appropriate for the parties to file any communications regarding 

settlement matters with the district court judge.

Case 3:14-cv-03657-SI Document 563 Filed 05/24/19 Page 1 of 1