Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02190/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02190-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST

Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

CALIFORNIA

Lisa C. Hamasaki (SBN 197628)

 lch@millerlawgroup.com

Shannon R. Clawson (SBN 273699)

 sclawson@millerlawgroup.com

MILLER LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

111 Sutter Street, Suite 700

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel. (415) 464-4300

Fax (415) 464-4336

Attorneys for Defendant

AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC

MICHELLE DYE NEUMANN (STATE BAR #303601)

BRIAN GEARINGER (STATE BAR #146125)

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF SARA MCENROE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SARA McENROE,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC, and DOES 

1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK)

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND 

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE 

FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR 

DEFENDANT LIMITED TO ISSUES 

STEMMING FROM CERTAIN DISCOVERY 

REQUESTS CONCERNING PLAINTIFF’S 

ALLEGED DAMAGES

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, California 94102

Complaint filed: April 14, 2015

Trial Date: January 23, 2017

NEUMANN LAW 

3558 ROUND BARN BLVD., SUITE 200

SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95403

(707) 636-4295

GEARINGER LAW GROUP

740 FOURTH STREET

SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95404

(415) 440-3102

Case 4:15-cv-02190-HSG Document 78 Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 3
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST

Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff SARA MCENROE and Defendant AT&T Mobility Services LLC 

(“Defendant” or “AT&T”) (collectively, “the Parties”), through their counsel of record, filed a 

stipulation and request for extension of the fact discovery deadline for Defendant, which 

would be limited to issues stemming from certain discovery requests concerning Plaintiff’s 

alleged damages set forth in Defendant’s Requests for Production, Set Two and 

Interrogatories, Set Two.

After full consideration of the stipulation and request submitted by the parties, 

the supporting declaration, and all other matters presented to this Court, and good cause 

appearing therefore, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties’ stipulation and request is 

hereby GRANTED to allow time for Defendant to conduct discovery limited to issues that 

stem from Plaintiff’s responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production, Set Two, and 

Interrogatories, Set Two, including depositions and written discovery, which the Parties 

understand shall be discovery related to Plaintiff’s alleged damages for emotional distress 

and alleged compensatory damages and mitigation efforts. The Court HEREBY ORDERS 

THAT:

 Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant’s Requests for Production, Set Two, 

and Interrogatories, Set Two, on or by July 1, 2016;

 The fact discovery cut-off to conduct discovery on issues that stem from 

Plaintiff’s responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production, Set Two, 

and Interrogatories, Set Two, including depositions and written 

discovery, which the Parties understand shall be discovery related to 

Plaintiff’s alleged damages for emotional distress and alleged 

compensatory damages and mitigation efforts (e.g., depositions of 

Plaintiff’s health care providers and records from Plaintiff’s subsequent 

employers, if any) – and for this discovery only – shall be extended to 

August 5, 2016;

Case 4:15-cv-02190-HSG Document 78 Filed 06/17/16 Page 2 of 3
3

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST

Case No.: C 15-02190 HSG (SK)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

CALIFORNIA

 Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 37-3, no motion to compel fact discovery 

by Defendant in relation to the above-discussed discovery may be filed 

more than 7 days after the amended fact discovery cut-off of August 5, 

2016;

 No other deadlines or dates set forth in the operative Scheduling Order 

issued on May 13, 2016 (Dkt. No. 69) shall be altered or otherwise 

affected by this Order.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 17, 2016 ________________________ Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam

United States District Judge

4830-0069-2274, v. 1

Case 4:15-cv-02190-HSG Document 78 Filed 06/17/16 Page 3 of 3