Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01892/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01892-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS AND CONTINUING INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

CIVIL ACTION NO. C 06-1892 EDL 

372909.01 

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649 

DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 

RYAN M. KENT - #220441 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

NETFLIX, INC. 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

MICHAEL A. MOLANO (SBN 171057) 

mmolano@mayerbrownrowe.com 

JOSHUA M. MASUR (SBN 203510) 

jmasur@mayerbrownrowe.com 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 

[Additional counsel listed on signature page] 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

NCR CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

NETFLIX, INC., a California Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NCR CORPORATION, a Maryland 

Corporation, 

Defendant. 

NCR CORPORATION, a Maryland 

Corporation, 

Counterclaimant, 

v. 

NETFLIX, INC., a California Corporation, 

Counterdefendant. 

Civil Action No. C 06-1892 EDL 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

AND CONTINUING INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case 3:06-cv-01892-EDL Document 14 Filed 05/12/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS AND CONTINUING INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

372909.01 CIVIL ACTION NO. C 06-1892 EDL 

The parties stipulate that they will pursue ADR through the Court’s Mediation program, 

and request that the Court order the Mediation to be held on or before June 10, 2006. In 

consideration of the parties’ agreement to mediate, the parties request that the Court continue the 

case-management conference presently scheduled for July 11, 2006, as well as the associated 

obligations set forth in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Process 

dated March 6, 2006, by five weeks. No previous time modifications have been entered in this 

Action. 

The parties therefore stipulate and agree, as required by Local Rules 6-2, 7-12, and 16-

2(e), that the Court should modify its Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference as 

follows: 

• The case-management-conference shall occur in Courtroom E, 15th Floor at 

10:00 A.M. on August 15, 2006. 

• The parties’ last day to complete initial disclosures or state objections to such 

disclosures in their Rule 26(f) report, and to file and serve their case-management 

statement and Rule 26(f) report shall be August 9, 2006. 

• The parties’ last day to meet and confer as to initial disclosures, early settlement, 

and their discovery plan shall be July 25, 2006. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________ 

THE HON. ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

May 12, 2006

, to the extent possible, 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

U

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:06-cv-01892-EDL Document 14 Filed 05/12/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS AND CONTINUING INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

372909.01 CIVIL ACTION NO. C 06-1892 EDL 

Dated: May 11, 2006 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ Daralyn J. Durie ________________

Daralyn J. Durie 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counterdefendant 

NETFLIX, INC. 

Dated: May 11, 2006 MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW, LLP 

By: /s/ Michael A. Molano ______________

Michael A. Molano 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant 

NCR CORPORATION 

 I hereby attest, pursuant to section X of General Order 45, that concurrence in the filing 

of this document has been obtained from Michael A. Molano, Esq., Attorney for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant NCR Corporation. 

Dated: May 11, 2006 By: /s/ Daralyn J. Durie 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

PAUL R. GUPTA (Pro hac vice) 

pgupta@mayerbrownrowe.com 

CLIFFORD R. MICHEL (Pro hac vice)

cmichel@mayerbrownrowe.com 

1675 Broadway 

New York, New York 10019-5820 

Telephone: (212) 506-2500 

Facsimile: (202) 262-1910 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

NCR CORPORATION 

Case 3:06-cv-01892-EDL Document 14 Filed 05/12/06 Page 3 of 3