Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02041/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02041-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY DENTON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-03-2041 DFL DAD P

vs.

M. KNOWLES,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 31, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Neither party has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

/////

/////

Case 2:03-cv-02041-TMB Document 24 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 31, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner’s April 19, 2005 renewed motion to stay and hold these proceedings

in abeyance is granted;

3. Petitioner shall present his unexhausted claim to the California Supreme Court

in a state habeas petition filed within thirty days after this action is stayed;

4. This action is stayed and the Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively

close the case;

5. Petitioner shall file and serve a status report in this case on the first court day

of each month until the stay is lifted; and

6. Petitioner shall file and serve a motion to lift the stay of this action, along with

a proposed second amended petition containing all exhausted claims, within thirty days after

petitioner is served with the California Supreme Court’s order disposing of the state exhaustion

petition.

DATED: 7/22/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-02041-TMB Document 24 Filed 07/26/05 Page 2 of 2