Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01296/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01296-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

K:\COMMON\BROOKS\CASES\ATI-INDUSTRIES1296\MINUTE01.wpd

MINUTES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ATI v. ART AND FRAME MART Case No. 08cv1296 IEG(RBB)

Time Spent: 31 mins.

HON. RUBEN B. BROOKS CT. DEPUTY VICKY LEE Rptr. CD 1: 10:24:00-10:51:25

Attorneys

Plaintiffs Defendants

Thomas Ferrell (present) David Ricks (present) 

 

PROCEEDINGS: In Chambers x In Court Telephonic

On September 29, 2008, Plaintiff filed an Amended Motion for Order Directed

to Art and Frame Mart Corp. and Josef Nazar to Show Cause Why Each Should Not

be Held in Contempt And Sanctioned for Failure to Comply With Subpoenas [doc.

no. 16]. Defense counsel responded with an opposition [doc. no. 20] and

later filed his Amended Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to

Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Order Directed to Art and Frame Mart Corp. and

Josef Nazar to Show Cause Why Each Should Not be Held in Contempt and

Sanctioned For Failure to Comply With Subpoenas [doc. no. 21] on October 14,

2008. Plaintiff filed its Reply on October 17, 2008 [doc. no. 22]. 

A motion hearing was held.

For the reasons discussed on the record, the Court finds that Plaintiff has

not established that sanctions for contempt, or otherwise, should be awarded

at this time. Thus, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.

DATE: October 27, 2008 IT IS SO ORDERED: _________________________

Ruben B. Brooks, 

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

cc: Judge Gonzalez INITIALS: VL (mg/irc) Deputy

 All Parties of Record

Case 3:08-cv-01296-RBB Document 23 Filed 10/27/08 Page 1 of 1