Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02638/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02638-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 Before Magistrate Judge Aspey were Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Conform his

Complaint to the Evidence, (i.e. a motion for leave to file a first amended complaint) (Doc.

56) and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint for the reason that it

was not timely filed. (Doc. 64.)

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mark Gunn Lloyd, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CV 07-2638-PHX-PGR (MEA)

)

v. ) ORDER

)

Joseph Arpaio, Detention Officer )

Barron, Detention Officer Plague, )

Nurse Jackie, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________)

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Aspey (Doc. 90), wherein he determined whether Plaintiff was entitled to file a first amended

complaint upon receiving from Plaintiff a motion for leave to conform his complaint to the

evidence.1

 Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation and no party having

filed any objection to the Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(Doc. 90) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by the Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 56)

Case 2:07-cv-02638-RCB Document 99 Filed 10/22/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 Plaintiff is reminded that the amended complaint may not incorporate by reference

any part of the original complaint, and it supercedes the original complaint. Accordingly,

permitting Plaintiff to file an amended complaint will preclude Plaintiff from proceeding with

his claims against Defendants Arpaio and Preston, as his complaint does not state any basis

for liability or any factual claims regarding the aforementioned defendants, that is, absent

further pleading to again amend his complaint.

2

is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 64) is

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is permitted to file an amended complaint2

limited to correcting the original complaint only as to which Defendant acted improperly in

calibrating the pepper spray device used on Plaintiff and which Defendant actually fired the

pepper spray. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is permitted to correct facts regarding the

identity of defendants, which were revealed during discovery; however, Plaintiff may not

add facts. Plaintiff shall file a proposed amended complaint containing the factual

allegations and legal causes of action with regard to each Defendant no later than Friday,

November 21, 2008.

DATED this 21st day of October, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02638-RCB Document 99 Filed 10/22/08 Page 2 of 2