Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00874/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00874-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 12:635 Breach of Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HARRY M. REYNOLDS, et al., )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

)

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE )

COMPANY, et al., )

)

)

Defendant. )

)

)

No. CV-F-05-874 REC/SMS

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS

TO FILE FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2005

In response to the court's order to show cause why this

action should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, because of plaintiffs' failure to file

a First Amended Complaint within 30 days of the court's Order to

do so filed on August 30, 2005. Plaintiff Harry M. Reynolds, who

is a practicing attorney, avers that he did not comply with the

court’s Order because he has been suffering from “stress

resulting in heart insufficiency at least partially as a result

of being overloaded in his practice and, as such, was unable to

Case 1:05-cv-00874-LJO -SMS Document 33 Filed 12/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

file a timely response.” Plaintiffs request another 30 days

within which to comply with the court’s Order.

While the court will grant an additional extension of time

to file a First Amended Complaint, the extension will be until

Thursday, December 22, 2005. 

The court will extend the time within which to file a First

Amended Complaint to Thursday, December 22, 2005. Failure to

timely comply will result in the dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00874-LJO -SMS Document 33 Filed 12/12/05 Page 2 of 2