Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01684/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01684-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JIMMY RAYMOND BLOW,

Plaintiff,

v.

WARDEN DENNIS SMITH, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01684-AWI-GSA PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 14)

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Docs. 3, 9, 10, 13)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

(Doc. 1)

Plaintiff Jimmy Raymond Blow (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), which provides a remedy for violation of civil rights by

federal actors. Plaintiff filed this action on November 21, 2007, and the matter was referred to a

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On March 31, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein

which was served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objection to the

Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file an Objection

to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Case 1:07-cv-01684-AWI-GSA Document 15 Filed 05/27/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings andRecommendationsto be supported bythe record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed March 31, 2008, is adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief, filed November 21, 2007,

January 2, 2008, and March 17, 2008, are denied; and

3. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 23, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01684-AWI-GSA Document 15 Filed 05/27/08 Page 2 of 2