Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00664/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00664-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN FRANKLIN PARKS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, )

et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:06-cv-00664 OWW TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 11)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On January 2, 2008, a Court order mailed to Petitioner on November 27, 2007, was returned

by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. On March 11, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to

the case filed Findings and Recommendations recommending that the petition for writ of habeas

corpus be DISMISSED for Petitioner's failure to prosecute. (Doc. 11). The Findings and

Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. To date, none of the parties in this

case have filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Case 1:06-cv-00664-OWW -TAG Document 12 Filed 04/10/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 11, 2008 (Doc. 11), are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 10, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00664-OWW -TAG Document 12 Filed 04/10/08 Page 2 of 2