Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00004/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00004-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

01 

02 

03 

04 

05 

06 

07 

08 

09 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HERMAN GARCIA SANDOVAL, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MIKE MARTEL, Warden, 

Respondent. 

____________________________________

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 2:07-cv-00004-RSM-JLW 

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By Order filed March 1, 2010, respondent was directed 

to file an answer to the second amended petition within forty-five days from the date 

petitioner filed his amended petition. (See Docket 37 at 2.) Petitioner timely filed his second 

amended petition on March 29, 2010. (See Dkt. 38.) Respondent has not filed a response 

within the forty-five day period provided by this Court’s Order. 

Case 2:07-cv-00004-RSM-JLW Document 39 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 2
01 

02 

03 

04 

05 

06 

07 

08 

09 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 2 

JOHN L. WEINBERG 

United States Magistrate Judge 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days from the date 

of this Order respondent shall: 

(1) Explain in writing why respondent has failed to file a response within the time 

permitted; 

(2) Show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply 

with this Court’s March 1, 2010, Order; and 

(3) Lodge a proposed Answer to the Second Amended Petition. 

DATED this 4th day of June, 2010. 

A 

Case 2:07-cv-00004-RSM-JLW Document 39 Filed 06/04/10 Page 2 of 2