Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01429/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01429-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT NOLT v MEHAS 

IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ CASE NO: 1:05-CV-01429-LJO-SMS

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY

ADJUDICATION

PETER SEAN BRADLEY, ESQ. #109258

RANDALL M. PENNER, ESQ., #101201

PENNER, BRADLEY & BUETTNER

1171 WEST SHAW AVENUE, SUITE 102

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93711

TELEPHONE (559)221-2100

FACSIMILE (559)221-2101

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

TIM NOLT, TIM ALLISON and CHRIS HUDSON

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIM NOLT, TIM ALLISON )

and CHRIS HUDSON, )

 )

Plaintiffs, )

 )

v )

 )

PETER G. MEHAS; JAN BIGGS; )

KEN CAMPBELL, )

 )

Defendants. )

_____________________________________ )

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-1429-LJO-SMS

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO

EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR POINTS

AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT

OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR

SUMMARY ADJUDICATION and

ORDER

DATE 8/27/07

TIME 8 30

COURTROOM 4

APPLICATION

I, Peter Sean Bradley, do hereby declare and state:

1. I am a member of the law firm of Penner, Bradley & Buettner, counsel of record

herein for plaintiffs and am duly licensed to practice law before all courts in the State of California

and before this Court.

2. This Application is made for leave to file a brief not exceeding fifty pages on the

grounds that the issues addressed in defendants’ motion are many, involving multiple parties and

Case 1:05-cv-01429-LJO -SMS Document 43 Filed 08/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT NOLT v MEHAS 

IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ CASE NO: 1:05-CV-01429-LJO-SMS

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY

ADJUDICATION

- 2 -

multiple defendants. Defendants obtained leave to file a brief not to exceed fifty pages and filed a

brief consisting of forty-five pages.

3. Plaintiffs’ opposition is to be filed on or before Monday, August 13, 2007, per this

Court’s order of June 26, 207.

4. I am mindful of this Court’s standing order limiting pleadings in summary judgment

motions to twenty-five pages. However, in this instance, defendants have filed a brief of forty-five

pages, the opposition must address the action of each defendant, individually, in the context of each

separate allegation. There are a number of complicated legal issues which are thoroughly briefed

for the benefit of this Court.

5. Plaintiffs have been able to reduce the supporting authorities to fifty pages, and will

endeavor to furtherlimit the length of the pleadings. Plaintiffs nevertheless request permission from

this Court to file points and authorities in support of the opposition not to exceed fifty pages

(excluding face page and tables).

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of American that the

foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that this declaration is executed by me

this 8 day of June, 2007. th

/s/ Peter Sean Bradley 

PETER S. BRADLEY

ORDER

Upon ex parte application submitted by plaintiffs, and good cause appearing, leave is hereby

granted in favor of plaintiffs to file its brief in support of the opposition to motion for summary

judgment and/or summary adjudication, not to exceed fifty pages in length (excluding face page and

tables) on the condition that plaintiffs’ brief is well organized, succinct and clear and does not

unduly repeat points.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 8, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01429-LJO -SMS Document 43 Filed 08/08/07 Page 2 of 2