Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01377/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01377-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 730
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Report &amp; Disclosure
Cause of Action: 29:0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAXIMA C. RODRIGUEZ, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL,

ET AL.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-10-01377 JCS

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

CLARIFICATION [Docket No. 69]

Defendant has filed a Request for Clarification of Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (“Request”). In the Request, Defendant

asks the Court to order Plaintiffs to file a second amended complaint consistent with the Court’s

November 23, 2010 Order. The Request is DENIED.

 On November 23, 2010, the Court issued a lengthy order addressing the sufficiency of

Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. Rather than ordering Plaintiffs to submit a second amended

complaint, the Court addressed whether each of Plaintiffs’ factual allegations was sufficient to

support a claim and dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims as to the conduct that it found did not support a

claim. Having carefully set forth the factual allegations in Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint that

are sufficient to state a claim (as well as those that are not), the Court concludes that Defendant has

adequate notice of the alleged conduct that supports Plaintiffs’ claims, to the extent that they have 

Case 3:10-cv-01377-JCS Document 70 Filed 01/03/11 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

survived Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the Court declines to require that Plaintiffs

file a second amended complaint. 

Dated: January 3, 2011

 

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:10-cv-01377-JCS Document 70 Filed 01/03/11 Page 2 of 2