Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00253/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00253-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REYES V. KENOSIAN & MIELE ET AL. (CASE NO. C07 00253 MJJ)

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY MOTIONS

TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576)

JEFFREY A. TOPOR (SBN 195545)

SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3010

San Francisco, CA 94104-4816

Telephone: (415) 283-1000

Facsimile: (415) 352-2625

tnarita@snllp.com

jtopor@snllp.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Kenosian & Miele, LLP and

Kenneth John Miele

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANUEL LOPEZ REYES,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

KENOSIAN & MIELE, LLP, a

California limited liability partnership,

and KENNETH JOHN MIELE,

individually and in his official

capacity,

 Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C07 00253 MJJ

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE

PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY

MOTIONS

Date: September 21, 2007

Time: 11:00 a.m.

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins

Case 3:07-cv-00253-MJJ Document 68 Filed 09/28/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REYES V. KENOSIAN & MIELE ET AL. (CASE NO. C07 00253 MJJ)

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY MOTIONS 2.

The following motions of Plaintiff Manuel Lopez Reyes came on for

telephonic hearing at 11:00 a.m. on September 21, 2007 before this Court:

(1) Motion to Compel Impact Information Service to Comply with

Subpoena:

(2) Motion to Compel further Depositions and Production of Documents,

Motion for Extension of Discovery Cutoff and Motion for Continuance

of Case Management Deadlines; and,

(3) Motion for Order Regarding Deposition Protocol.

Fred Schwinn appeared for Plaintiff, and Tomio B. Narita appeared for

Defendants Kenosian & Miele, LLP and Kenneth John Miele. After consideration of

the briefs and arguments of counsel, and all other matters presented to the Court, and

good cause appearing, the Court issues the following ORDER:

The Motions for Order Regarding Deposition Protocol, for Extension of

Discovery Cutoff and for Continuance of Case Management Deadlines are DENIED.

Based on (1) the scope of the claims as pled in the current complaint; (2) the

Defendants’ withdrawal of their affirmative defenses of bona fide error, supervening

cause, equitable indemnity and apportionment; and (3) Plaintiff’s concessions at the

hearing (made in light Defendants’ withdrawal of the affirmative defenses identified

in this paragraph), the Court QUASHES the subpoena issued to Information Impact

Service, DENIES the Motion to Compel further Depositions of Kenneth John Miele

and Arash A. Khakshooy, and DENIES the Motion to Compel Production of

Documents in part, as follows. Specifically, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel

Production of Documents identified during the deposition of Kenneth John Miele is

DENIED. As to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of unredacted versions of

documents labeled MK 0280-0308 and JM0310-0314, Defendants are ordered to

review those documents and determine whether they will produce them in unredacted

form, no later than September 25, 2007. Should Defendants decide not to produce

Case 3:07-cv-00253-MJJ Document 68 Filed 09/28/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REYES V. KENOSIAN & MIELE ET AL. (CASE NO. C07 00253 MJJ)

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY MOTIONS 3.

the documents in unredacted form, they shall provide Plaintiff with a privilege log

setting forth the specific basis of the privilege claimed as to each document.

Absent further order of the Court, Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the

Pleadings and Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint remain

on calendar for October 16, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _________________________ ________________________________

United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

09/28/07

Case 3:07-cv-00253-MJJ Document 68 Filed 09/28/07 Page 3 of 3