Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-md-02045/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-md-02045-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMIT ON APPLE’S REPLY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. M 09-02045 JW

sf-2801870

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607)

(PPreovolos@mofo.com)

ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694)

(AMuhlbach@mofo.com)

HEATHER A. MOSER (CA SBN 212686)

(HMoser@mofo.com)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE: APPLE IPHONE 3G PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION

Case No. M 09-02045 JW

CLASS ACTION

This Document Relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO 

ENLARGE PAGE LIMIT ON APPLE 

INC.’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS 

MOTION TO DISMISS MASTER 

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSOLIDATED 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Civil Local Rules 7-4(b) and 7-11

By this Stipulated Request, Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) respectfully requests, 

pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-4(b) and 7-11, to enlarge the page limitation applicable to its 

Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Dismiss (“Reply”), as set forth in Civil Local 

Rule 7-4(b), by five (5) pages.

WHEREAS, on October 21, 2009, Plaintiffs filed their Master Administrative 

Consolidated Amended Complaint, asserting 14 causes of action against Defendants.

Case 5:09-md-02045-JW Document 157 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMIT ON APPLE’S REPLY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. M 09-02045 JW 1

sf-2801870

WHEREAS, on December 4, 2009, Apple filed its Motion to Dismiss the Master 

Administrative Consolidated Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs filed their Opposition to Apple’s 

Motion to Dismiss on January 22, 2010. 

WHEREAS, due to the complexities of consolidated putative class action cases such as 

this, and in order to adequately address the 14 causes of action under various state laws and reply 

to Plaintiffs’ 26-page opposition brief (including four pages of argument incorporated by 

reference from a separate filing), it is necessary for Apple’s Reply to exceed the fifteen (15) page 

limitation set forth in Local Rule 7-4(b). 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ lead counsel, Adam P. Plant of Whatley, Drake & Kallas LLP, has 

agreed on behalf of Plaintiffs to Apple’s request to enlarge the page limitation for the Reply by 

five (5) pages.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Apple 

may exceed the page limit set forth in Local Rule 7-4(b) by no more than five (5) pages for its 

Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Dismiss the Master Administrative Consolidated 

Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 5:09-md-02045-JW Document 157 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMIT ON APPLE’S REPLY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. M 09-02045 JW 2

sf-2801870

Dated: February 11, 2010 PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS

ANDREW D. MUHLBACH

HEATHER A. MOSER

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Penelope A. Preovolos

Penelope A. Preovolos

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC.

Dated: February 11, 2010 THE CONSUMER LAW GROUP

By: /s/ Adam P. Plant Adam P. Plant

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

I, Penelope A. Preovolos, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this Stipulated Request to Enlarge Page Limit on Apple’s Reply and [Proposed] Order. In 

compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Adam P. Plant has concurred in this 

filing.

Dated: February 11, 2010

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Penelope A. Preovolos

Penelope A. Preovolos

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February _____, 2010 ___________________________________ The Honorable James Ware

United States District Judge

11

Case 5:09-md-02045-JW Document 157 Filed 02/11/10 Page 3 of 3