Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01793/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01793-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WILLIAM BARKER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND 

REHABILITATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-1793 KJM KJN P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On June 25, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, 

this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:13-cv-01793-KJM-KJN Document 24 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.1

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 25, 2015 (ECF No. 22) are 

adopted in full; 

 2. Plaintiff’s claims under California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code 

§§ 51 et seq. and the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54.1 et seq., are 

dismissed with prejudice; 

 3. Plaintiff’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant Mark Green in his 

official capacity is dismissed with prejudice; 

 4. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 19) is otherwise denied; and 

 5. Defendants are directed to file an answer to the remaining claims within twenty 

days of the date of this order. 

DATED: September 15, 2015. 

 

1

 The court corrects a typographical error at page 6, line 1 of the findings and recommendations 

to reflect that the Norsworthy decision will be published in F.Supp.3d. 

Case 2:13-cv-01793-KJM-KJN Document 24 Filed 09/16/15 Page 2 of 2