Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04595/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04595-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C-06-4595-PJH 

402271.02 

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065 

PAULA L. BLIZZARD - #207920 

BROOK DOOLEY - #230423 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Defendants 

FOXHOLLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

JOHN B. SIMPSON, and 

MATTHEW B. FERGUSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE FOXHOLLOW TECHNOLOGIES, 

INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to ALL ACTIONS 

Master File No. C-06-4595-PJH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS CONSOLIDATED 

COMPLAINT AND DENYING 

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR 

JUDICIAL NOTICE AS MOOT

Date: September 5, 2007 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 3 

Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-04595-PJH Document 54 Filed 09/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C-06-4595-PJH 

402271.02 

Defendants FoxHollow Technologies, Inc., John B. Simpson, and Matthew B. Ferguson 

moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint for Violation of Federal Securities Laws 

(“Consolidated Complaint”). The motion came on for hearing on September 5, 2007. 

For the reasons stated at the hearing on September 5, 2007, the Court, having considered 

the motion, Plaintiffs’ opposition thereto, Defendants’ reply, oral argument presented, and the 

record on file herein, HEREBY ORDERS that the motion of Defendants to Dismiss is 

GRANTED without prejudice. 

Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend and may file a First Amended Complaint on or 

before October 5, 2007. Defendants may file any response on or before November 5, 2007. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice is denied as 

moot and without prejudice to Defendants’ right to file a Request for Judicial Notice in 

connection with their response to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Consolidated Complaint. 

APPROVED AS TO FORM: 

Dated: September 7, 2007 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ Paula L. Blizzard 

Paula L. Blizzard 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: September 7, 2007 COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY 

By: /s/ Mark C. Molumphy 

[Concurrence Obtained General Order 45 § X.B]

Mark C. Molumphy 

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and Class 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Dated: 

 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 

 JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

9/10/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-04595-PJH Document 54 Filed 09/11/07 Page 2 of 2