Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-02137/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-02137-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS ALBERTO MEZA ROJO,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMADOR COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:22-cv-02137-JDP (PC)

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

On February 24, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that the claims 

were not cognizable. ECF No. 7. I granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint or 

advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, subject to a recommendation 

that it be dismissed. I also warned him that failure to comply with the February 24 order could 

result in dismissal of this action. Id. at 3. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. 

Accordingly, on April 27, 2023, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why 

this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 9. I notified him that if he wished to continue with 

this action he must file, within twenty-one days, an amended complaint or advisement of his 

intent to stand by his current complaint. I also warned him that failure to comply with the order 

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. 

The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 

responded to the April 27, 2023 order.

Case 2:22-cv-02137-DAD-JDP Document 10 Filed 06/20/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a 

United States District Judge to this case. 

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that:

1. This action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, 

and failure to state a claim, for the reasons set forth in the February 24, 2023 and April 27, 2023

orders.

2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close the case.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 16, 2023 

JEREMY D. PETERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-02137-DAD-JDP Document 10 Filed 06/20/23 Page 2 of 2