Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00743/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00743-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

 Order (2:23-cv-00743-KJM-DB) 

ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668 

Attorney General of California 

JAMES V. HART, State Bar No. 278763 

Supervising Deputy Attorney General 

PETER F. NASCENZI, State Bar No. 311664 

DAVID C. GOODWIN, State Bar No. 283322 

Deputy Attorneys General 

1300 I Street, Suite 125 

P.O. Box 944255 

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 

Telephone: (916) 210-7342 

Fax: (916) 324-5205 

E-mail: David.Goodwin@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff State of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. ROB 

BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney 

General of the State of California, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AZUMA CORPORATION; PHILLIP DEL 

ROSA, in his personal capacity and official 

capacity as Chairman of the Alturas Indian 

Rancheria; DAREN ROSE, in his personal 

capacity and official capacity as Vicechairman of the Alturas Indian Rancheria; 

and WENDY DEL ROSA, in her official 

capacity as Secretary-Treasurer of the 

Alturas Indian Rancheria, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00743-KJM-DB 

ORDER 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:23-cv-00743-KJM-SCR Document 27 Filed 07/26/23 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Order (2:23-cv-00743-KJM-DB) 

Good cause appearing, Plaintiff State of California, and Defendants Azuma Corporation, 

Phillip Del Rosa, Darren Rose and Wendy Del Rosa’s joint motion for administrative relief to 

alter the briefing schedule for Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file 

its opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss by August 11, 2023. Defendants may file a reply 

to Plaintiff’s opposition by August 25, 2023. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2023. 

Case 2:23-cv-00743-KJM-SCR Document 27 Filed 07/26/23 Page 2 of 2