Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-13-3826 EMC 

ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S

CORRECTIVE NOTICES

(Docket No. 109)

Before the Court are Uber’s revised proposed corrective notices and licensing agreement. 

Docket No. 109. In response to Uber’s requests, the Court orders as follows:

(1) Uber shall send the “advance notice” as it initially proposed. Drivers are more likely

to take note of the changes to the licensing agreement if a notice is sent in advance.

(2) Uber may exclude Plaintiffs’ counsel’s contact information from the licensing

agreement (but shall include it in the “advance notice” and the second notice that

accompanies the licensing agreement). 

The Court has made corrections (highlighted) to the revised proposed corrective notices and

licensing agreement. Uber shall issue the documents as corrected.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 18, 2014 _________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 111 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 1