Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01129/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01129-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE TYLER,

Petitioner,

v.

FRED FOULK, Warden at High Desert 

 State Prison,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:12-cv-01129-SKO HC

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO 

SHOW CAUSE AND EXTENDING TIME 

FOR RESPONDENT TO FILE 

SUPPLEMENTAL TRANSCRIPT

(Docs. 37 and 38)

On August 18, 2015, the Court entered an order directing Respondent to supplement the 

record with sufficient portions of the transcript of the trial (December 18, 2008) to permit the 

Court to determine whether the prosecution's introduction of new evidence in the course of 

Petitioner's first trial was intended to provoke Petitioner into moving for a mistrial or was 

otherwise attributable to State misconduct. Although the Court ordered Respondent to file the 

supplemental portions of the transcript within thirty days, Respondent failed to file the requested 

supplemental materials or to respond to the order in any other way. Accordingly, on September 

24, 2015, the Court issued an order to show cause why Respondent should not be sanctioned for 

failure to file the requested supplemental transcript. On October 2, 2015, Respondent advised the 

Court that the requested transcript was being transcribed and requested an extension of the time in 

which to file it to November 16, 2015.

Case 1:12-cv-01129-SKO Document 39 Filed 10/05/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS:

1. The order to show cause issued September 24, 2015 (Doc. 

37), is hereby discharged.

2. On or before November 16, 2015, Respondent shall file 

sufficient portions of the transcript of trial (December 18, 2008) to 

permit the Court to determine whether the prosecution's 

introduction of new evidence in the course of Petitioner's first trial 

was intended to provoke the defendant into moving for a mistrial or 

was otherwise attributable to State misconduct.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 5, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01129-SKO Document 39 Filed 10/05/15 Page 2 of 2