Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06268/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06268-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

Case No.: 5:07-cv-06268-EJD

ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

REZA NAGAHI,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT 

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:07-cv-06268-EJD 

ORDER RESETTING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

On March 27, 2015, Plaintiff Reza Nagahi (“Plaintiff”) requested a second continuance of 

the Case Management Conference originally scheduled upon remand from the Ninth Circuit Court 

of Appeals. The court granted Plaintiff’s request and continued the conference to May 28, 2015, 

more than 60 days from the date of Plaintiff’s request. Thereafter, on March 30, 2015, Plaintiff 

filed a document informing the court he would be unable to meet the rescheduled deadlines due to 

health issues. 

It is not the court’s intent to complicate Plaintiff’s health condition. However, Plaintiff 

must understand that this case is his to prosecute, and although he is pro se “he is expected to 

abide by the rules of the court in which he litigates.” Carter v. Comm’r, 784 F.2d 1006, 1008 (9th 

Cir. 1986). The filing of a case management conference statement and participation in a 

scheduling conference, whether in person or by telephone, are not extraordinarily burdensome 

tasks. Both of these events can occur before or while motions are pending in the Court of 

Case 5:07-cv-06268-EJD Document 272 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:07-cv-06268-EJD

ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Appeals, and Plaintiff’s more recent pleadings demonstrate he is at least capable of filing a case 

management conference statement. 

Accordingly, since Plaintiff states the prior amount of time was inadequate, the Case 

Management Conference is continued to 10:00 a.m. on June 25, 2015. The parties shall file a 

Joint Case Management Statement, or separate statements under Civil Local Rule 16-9, on or 

before June 18, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2015

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:07-cv-06268-EJD Document 272 Filed 03/30/15 Page 2 of 2