Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02672/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02672-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Injunction

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JULIO ESTRADA ESPINOZA, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ERIC HOLDER, United States Attorney 

General, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-02672-KJM-KJN 

ORDER 

On September 22, 2014, the defendants moved to dismiss this action for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, for summary judgment. ECF No. 13. A hearing was 

noticed and set for December 5, 2014. Id. On October 13, 2014, the plaintiffs opposed that 

motion and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 16. 

On November 25, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation to reset the hearing date to 

December 19, 2014. ECF No. 18. The stipulation was approved and the hearing reset. ECF 

No. 19. On December 12, 2014, the parties again filed a stipulated motion to continue the hearing 

date to July 24, 2015, explaining they were “exploring the possibility of an administrative 

resolution to the matter.” ECF No. 20. The stipulation was granted and the hearing reset 

accordingly. ECF No. 21. On June 30, 2015, the parties filed a stipulated motion to reset the 

Case 2:13-cv-02672-KJM-KJN Document 25 Filed 01/13/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

hearing date for January 15, 2016, explaining the “administrative process remains ongoing.” ECF 

No. 22. The hearing date was reset again as requested. ECF No. 23. 

On January 6, 2016, the parties again filed a stipulated motion to continue the 

hearing date until July 15, 2016, explaining “[t]he administrative process remains ongoing.” ECF 

No. 24. 

The court has not yet issued a pretrial scheduling order under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 or held an initial pretrial scheduling conference. 

The parties’ current request, ECF No. 24, is GRANTED IN PART: the hearing is 

RESET for February 12, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. Within seven days of the date this order is filed, the 

parties shall file a joint report explaining the circumstances of the “administrative process” and its 

expected timeline, and whether this action should be stayed. In the same report the parties may 

renew their request to continue the hearing date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 12, 2016. 

Case 2:13-cv-02672-KJM-KJN Document 25 Filed 01/13/16 Page 2 of 2