Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01143/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01143-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

- 1 – 

[Proposed] Stipulation and Order to Move Hearing Date 

on Motion for Summary Judgment Watkins v. Depee, et al. 

 Case No. C-05 1143-SI

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Law Offices of 

Tory M. Pankopf 

611 Sierra Rose Drive 

Reno, NV 89511 

(530) 725-8263

BEATIFICATO & ASSOCIATES 

Mary Helen Beatificato (State Bar No.: 220936) 

2 Venture Plaza, Suite 380 

Irvine, California 92618 

Telephone: (949) 585-0483 

Facsimile: (949) 585-0480 

E-Mail: mh@oclitigators.com

Tory M. Pankopf (SBN 202581) 

LAW OFFICES OF TORY M. PANKOPF 

611 Sierra Rose Drive 

Reno, Nevada 89511 

Telephone: (530) 725-8263 Fax: (530) 725-8264 

Email: tppankopf@sbcglobal.net 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYLVIA MAHACH-WATKINS, 

Individually and as the Successor in 

Interest to the Estate of JOHN JOSEPH 

WAYNE WATKINS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

LARRY DEPEE, STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA, and DOES 1 through 100, 

Inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

 CASE NO: C-05-1143-SI 

[Proposed] STIPULATION AND ORDER 

TO CHANGE TIME ON HEARING ON 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

[LR-6-2] 

Date: 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 10, 19th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Susan Illston

Plaintiff SYLVIA MAHACH-WATKINS, by and through her undersigned counsel, and 

Defendants’ LARRY DEPEE and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through their 

undersigned counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, stipulate to change the hearing date on 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (“Motion”) from September 22, 2006 (the 

“Parties”). The Parties have asked for only a 1-week extension of time on the hearing date. 

Case 3:05-cv-01143-SI Document 50 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-01143-SI Document 53 Filed 08/31/06 Page 1 of 3
 

 - 2 – 

[Proposed] Stipulation and Order to Move Hearing Date 

on Motion for Summary Judgment Watkins v. Depee, et al. 

 Case No. C-05 1143-SI

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Law Offices of 

Tory M. Pankopf 

611 Sierra Rose Drive 

Reno, NV 89511 

(530) 725-8263

However, the Court’s Clerk, Ms. Tracy Sutton, has advised that the October 6, 2006, date is 

better for the Court’s motion calendar. 

Pursuant to the Pre-trial Order, dispositive motions are to be filed on August 18, 2006, 

Opposition is due September 1, 2006, the reply is due September 15, 2006, and the hearing date 

is set for September 22, 2006. 

The new stipulated dates to file Plaintiff’s opposition and Defendants’ reply shall be 

September 8, 2006, and September 22, 2006, respectively (1-week extension). 

The purpose for the stipulation is that the motion for summary judgment filed by the 

Defendants is based upon numerous grounds and is fact intensive. Over 10 depositions have 

been taken and the Plaintiff needs to co-ordinate obtaining written declarations from her 

multiple expert witnesses. 

Furthermore, Plaintiff’s counsel has been involved in a 24-day jury trial (July 31-August 

23, 2006) in Orange County Superior Court, State of California, in the matter of Estates at 

Monarch Cove vs. Rodarte. Again, Plaintiff believes only 1-week is needed to prepare her 

opposition to the Motion, but the Clerk advises Plaintiff that October 6, 2006, will better suit the 

Court’s calendar. 

SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: August 30, 2006 BEATIFICATO & ASSOCIATES 

 BY:_/S/ MARY H. BEATIFICATO 

 MARY H. BEATIFICATO

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 3:05-cv-01143-SI Document 50 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-01143-SI Document 53 Filed 08/31/06 Page 2 of 3
 

 - 3 – 

[Proposed] Stipulation and Order to Move Hearing Date 

on Motion for Summary Judgment Watkins v. Depee, et al. 

 Case No. C-05 1143-SI

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Law Offices of 

Tory M. Pankopf 

611 Sierra Rose Drive 

Reno, NV 89511 

(530) 725-8263

DATED: August 30, 2006 

 BY:_/S/ DAVID W. HAMILTON 

 DAVID W. HAMILTION

 Deputy Attorney General 

Attorney for Defendants 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August ____, 2006 

 ___________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-01143-SI Document 50 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-01143-SI Document 53 Filed 08/31/06 Page 3 of 3