Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00799/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00799-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING

Civil Case No. 1:14-cv-00799-EPG 

 1

sf-3639244

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490)

AGonzalez@mofo.com

WESLEY E. OVERSON (CA SBN 154737)

WOverson@mofo.com

ROBERT J. ESPOSITO (CA SBN 267031)

REsposito@mofo.com

SABRINA A. LARSON (CA SBN 291661)

SLarson@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Fax: 415.268.7522

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

BRUCE D. PRAET (CA SBN 119430)

bpraet@aol.com

FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN

1631 East 18th Street

Santa Ana, California 92705-7101

Telephone: (714) 953-5300 

Fax: (714) 953-1143 

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

DORIS RAY KNOX; JERRY WAYNE KNOX;

JEREMY EDWARD MOORE, individually and

as successor-in-interest to VERONICA LYNN

CANTER, deceased,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF FRESNO, a municipal corporation;

EDWARD CHRISTOPHER LOUCHREN,

individually and in his capacity as a police officer

for the CITY OF FRESNO; DOUGLAS

EDWARD COX, individually and in his capacity

as a police officer for the CITY OF FRESNO,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00799-EPG

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CONTINUING HEARING 

Judge: Honorable Erica P. Grosjean

Date: May 27, 2016

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Place: Courtroom 10, 6th Floor 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144, Plaintiffs Doris Ray Knox, Jerry Wayne Knox, and 

Jeremy Edward Moore (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants City of Fresno, Edward Christopher 

Louchren, and Douglas Edward Cox (“Defendants”) (collectively, “the parties”) by and through 

their respective counsel, stipulate and request an order continuing the hearing on Defendants’ 

Motion for Contempt For Violation of Protective Order (Dkt. No. 56). 

Case 1:14-cv-00799-EPG Document 59 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING

Civil Case No. 1:14-cv-00799-EPG 

 2

sf-3639244

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion for Contempt For Violation of Protective Order 

on March 21, 2016 (Dkt. No. 56);

WHEREAS, Defendants set the date for hearing on their Motion on April 22, 2016; 

WHEREAS, the hearing date was not cleared with Plaintiffs’ counsel and Plaintiffs’ lead 

trial counsel will likely be in trial on April 22, 2016; 

WHEREAS, the parties conferred and contacted the Court regarding a continuance of the 

hearing until May 27, 2016;

WHEREAS, on March 30, 2016, the Court contacted the parties to request a stipulation 

and proposed order continuing the hearing on Defendants’ Motion until May 27, 2016, at 

10:00 a.m.

WHEREAS, the parties are not seeking any modification of other deadlines;

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the hearing on 

Defendants’ Motion for Contempt For Violation of Protective Order be set for May 27, 2016 at 

10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 30, 2016 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Sabrina A. Larson

SABRINA A. LARSON

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN

By: /s/ Bruce D. Praet (as authorized on 

30/30/2016)

 BRUCE D. PRAET

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 1:14-cv-00799-EPG Document 59 Filed 03/30/16 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING

Civil Case No. 1:14-cv-00799-EPG 

 3

sf-3639244

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order

Based on the above stipulation between the parties, the Court continues the hearing on 

Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 56), currently set for April 22, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., to 

May 27, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. Briefing shall be filed in accordance with the schedule set by Local 

Rule 230.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00799-EPG Document 59 Filed 03/30/16 Page 3 of 3