Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-2_08-cv-00129/USCOURTS-ared-2_08-cv-00129-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HELENA DIVISION

MARCELO SISNIEGA-SIBAJA

Reg. # 85216-079 PLAINTIFF

V. 2:08CV00129 JMM/HDY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and

UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS DEFENDANTS

PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

INSTRUCTIONS

The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District Court Judge

James M. Moody. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation.

Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the

objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your

objection. An original and one copy of your objections must be received in the office of the United

States District Court Clerk no later than eleven (11) days from the date of the findings and

recommendations. The copy will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely

objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact.

If you are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit new, different, or

additional evidence, and to have a hearing for this purpose before the District Judge, you must, at

the same time that you file your written objections, include the following:

1. Why the record made before the Magistrate Judge is inadequate.

Case 2:08-cv-00129-JMM Document 6 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 3
2

2. Why the evidence proffered at the hearing before the District 

Judge (if such a hearing is granted) was not offered at the 

hearing before the Magistrate Judge. 

 

3. The detail of any testimony desired to be introduced at the

hearing before the District Judge in the form of an offer of

proof, and a copy, or the original, of any documentary or

other non-testimonial evidence desired to be introduced at

the hearing before the District Judge.

From this submission, the District Judge will determine the necessity for an additional evidentiary

hearing, either before the Magistrate Judge or before the District Judge.

Mail your objections and “Statement of Necessity” to:

Clerk, United States District Court

Eastern District of Arkansas

600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149

Little Rock, AR 72201-3325

DISPOSITION

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Beaumont, Texas Federal Correctional Institution (formerly housed

at the Federal Correctional Institute in Forrest City) filed this action on July 7, 2008, acting pro se

pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and

the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), § 1402(b), § 2401(b), and §§ 2671-2680.

However, his Complaint was unaccompanied by an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

Accordingly, in an Order dated July 9, 2008 (docket entry #2), Plaintiff was directed to submit a

completed IFP application (or the $350.00 filing fee). 

Upon receipt of Plaintiff’s Complaint, a file-marked copy was mailed by the Clerk of the

Court to Plaintiff at the address provided by him: the Beaumont Correctional facility. This

correspondence was returned to the Court as undeliverable on July 21, 2008 (docket entry #4),

Case 2:08-cv-00129-JMM Document 6 Filed 07/29/08 Page 2 of 3
1

 Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) provides that: “It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to

promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address,

to monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. A party

appearing for himself/herself shall sign his/her pleadings and state his/her address, zip code, and

telephone number. If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to

within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any party proceeding pro se

shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”

3

marked “released.” A copy of the Court’s July 9th Order was also mailed to him at this same address,

the last known provided by him to the Court. It, too, was returned to the Court, on July 25, 2008

(docket entry #5), marked “released.” Under these circumstances, the undersigned concludes that

Plaintiff’s Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule

5.5(c)(2).1

 

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (docket entry #1) be

dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).

DATED this 29 day of July, 2008.

 ______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:08-cv-00129-JMM Document 6 Filed 07/29/08 Page 3 of 3