Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05045/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05045-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

JT CASE MGMT STMT 1 N:\LIT\LI2004\041148\00370560.DOC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Deputy 

JAMES EMERY, State Bar #153630 

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-4261 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

Email: james.emery@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendants 

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MICHAEL HAMMAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO; THE DEPARTMENT OF 

BUILDING INSPECTION, THE 

BUILDING INSPECTION 

COMMISSION, THE ABATEMENT 

APPEALS BOARD, FRANK Y. CHIU, 

DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF 

BUILDING INSPECTION, WILLIAM 

WONG, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF 

PERMIT SERVICES, JIM 

HUTCHINSON, DEPUTY DIRECTOR 

OF INSPECTION SERVICES, WING 

LAU, CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR, 

LEO MCFADDEN, SUPERVISOR 

CODE ENFORCEMENT SECTION, 

AND ROSEMARY BOSQUE, 

DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING 

INSPECTION HEARING OFFICER 

AND DOES 1-100. 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C03-5045 JSW/EDL

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT 

STATEMENT AND PROPOSED 

ORDER 

Date: April 21, 2006 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Place: Courtroom 2, 17th floor 

Date Filed: Nov. 13, 2003 

Trial Date: not set 

The parties have agreed on language for their settlement agreement. The City has 

executed the settlement agreement, and it has circulated the agreement for all other necessary 

CASE NO. C03-05045JSW 

Case 3:03-cv-05045-JSW Document 47 Filed 04/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-05045-JSW Document 48 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 2
JT CASE MGMT STMT 2 N:\LIT\LI2004\041148\00370560.DOC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

signatures. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, plaintiff will dismiss this action 

with prejudice once all parties have executed the settlement agreement. 

The parties jointly request that the Court continue the case management conference until 

June 2, 2006. The parties expect the case will be dismissed before that date. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Dated: April 18, 2006 By: /s/ 

JAMES M. EMERY 

Attorneys for Defendants 

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO; THE DEPARTMENT OF 

BUILDING INSPECTION, THE BUILDING 

INSPECTION COMMISSION, THE 

ABATEMENT APPEALS BOARD, FRANK Y. 

CHIU, WILLIAM WONG, JIM HUTCHINSON, 

WING LAU, LEO MCFADDEN, AND 

ROSEMARY BOSQUE 

Dated: April 18, 2006 By: /s/ 

PAUL F. UTRECHT 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MICHAEL HAMMAN 

SO ORDERED: 

Dated: __________ __________________________________ 

 HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE 

 United States District Judge 

CASE NO. C03-05045JSW 

Case 3:03-cv-05045-JSW Document 47 Filed 04/18/2006 Page 2 of 2

April 19, 2006

Case 3:03-cv-05045-JSW Document 48 Filed 04/19/06 Page 2 of 2