Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-3_14-cv-00183/USCOURTS-ared-3_14-cv-00183-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

JONESBORO DIVISION

SAVOIL KING and DOROTHY KING, PLAINTIFFS

for themselves and all Arkansas residents

similarly situated

v. CASE NO: 3:14CV00183 BSM

HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Pursuant to plaintiffs’ notice of withdrawal of their motion for leave to amend [Doc.

No. 85], plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend [Doc. No. 80] is denied as moot. Defendants

are directed to file an answer to plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claim [Doc. No. 2] within

fourteen days of this order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A); Broglie v. Mackay-Smith, 75 F.R.D.

739, 742 (W.D. Va. 1977) (when a court of appeals reverse a district court’s Rule 12(b)

dismissal, defendant’s obligation to file an answer pursuant to Rule 12(a)(1) is revived, and

defendant has 14 days from the notification of reversal to file such answer).

The parties’ joint motion for entry of scheduling order [Doc. No. 84] is granted and

a scheduling order will be entered following this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of August 2016.

________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-00183-BSM Document 86 Filed 08/19/16 Page 1 of 1