Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-04641/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-04641-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALFRED LAM, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

THE CITY & COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 10-cv-4641-PJH 

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO AMEND 

SECOND PRETRIAL ORDER 

 Both parties in the above-captioned case have filed motions to amend the 

operative second pretrial order. As indicated by the title “second pretrial order,” the court 

has already amended the pretrial order once, in order to extend the discovery period to 

allow the parties to complete depositions. Specifically, on July 31, 2015, the court 

extended the deposition deadline from August 7, 2015 until October 16, 2015. See Dkt. 

138. In order to accommodate that extension, the court continued the dispositive motion 

hearing date from October 21, 2015 to December 23, 2015; the pretrial conference date 

from February 4, 2016 to April 1, 2016; and the trial date from February 29, 2016 to May 

9, 2016. 

Now, on the eve of the extended deposition deadline, the parties seek another 

extension. Having already received 60-day extensions of the above dates, the parties 

now each seek an additional 90 days. The court DENIES the parties’ requested relief. 

The court will, however, briefly extend the deadline for the parties to take 

depositions, which also necessitates a continuance of the dispositive motion dates. 

Specifically, the court will allow the parties until November 27, 2015 to complete 

Case 4:10-cv-04641-PJH Document 171 Filed 10/09/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

de

ext

als

ha

dis

de

De

7-3

rep

cut

20

Da

positions. 

tend the da

so rejects p

ve until Nov

scovery rem

As a re

adlines for 

Openin

Oppos

Reply 

Hearin

If eithe

ecember 9, 

3 will apply 

plies must b

Importa

toff (March 

16) shall re

No furt

IT IS S

ated: Octob

The court r

ate for defen

laintiffs’ req

vember 27,

mains close

esult of that

dispositive 

ng briefs: 

sition briefs:

briefs: 

g date: 

er party wish

2015, it ma

(i.e., oppos

be filed no m

antly, the d

18, 2016), 

emain unch

ther extens

SO ORDER

ber 9, 2015

rejects defe

ndants, but

quest to reo

, 2015 to co

d. 

t extension,

motions. 

: 

hes to file it

ay do so, an

sitions mus

more than 7

ates for ex

the pretria

anged. 

ions of thes

RED. 

2

endants’ req

t not plaintif

open discov

omplete de

, the court a

Dece

Dece

Dece

Janua

ts motion fo

nd the brief

st be filed no

7 days afte

pert disclos

l conferenc

se dates wi

__

PH

Un

quest for a 

ffs, to cond

very for all p

positions, a

also impose

ember 9, 20

ember 23, 2

ember 30, 2

ary 13, 201

or summary

fing schedu

o more tha

er the oppos

sures (Febr

ce (April 1, 2

ill be consid

__________

HYLLIS J. H

nited States

one-way ex

uct deposit

purposes. 

and the per

es the follow

015 

2015 

2015 

16 

y judgment 

ule set forth

n 14 days a

sition is due

ruary 12, 20

2016), and 

dered. 

__________

HAMILTON

s District Ju

xtension, w

tions; and t

Both partie

riod for writt

wing amen

earlier than

h in Civil Loc

after the mo

e). 

016), exper

the trial da

 

__________

udge 

which would

he court 

es shall 

ten 

nded 

n

cal Rule 

otion, and 

rt discovery

ate (May 9, 

_______ 

y

Case 4:10-cv-04641-PJH Document 171 Filed 10/09/15 Page 2 of 2