Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01145/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01145-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Rocco Delia, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio,

Defendant, 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-05-1145-PHX-MHM (HCE)

 

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Hector C. Estrada who has issued a Report and

Recommendation that recommends that the complaint and action should be dismissed without

prejudice. (Doc. 8). Plaintiff has not filed written objections to the Report and

Recommendation. 

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The Court must review the legal analysis in the Report and Recommendation de novo.

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court must review the factual analysis in the Report and

Recommendation de novo for those facts to which objections are filed. "Failure to object to

a magistrate judge's recommendation waives all objections to the judge's findings of fact."

Jones v. Wood, 207 F.3d 557, 562 n.2 (9th Cir. 2000). 

DISCUSSION

The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the complaint and action should be

dismissed without prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. As discussed

Case 2:05-cv-01145-MHM Document 10 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

in the Report and Recommendation, a docket entry dated November 9, 2005 shows that mail

sent to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable. (Doc. 7). Following the filing of the Report

and Recommendation, a docket entry dated March 13, 2006 shows that mail sent to Plaintiff

was returned as undeliverable. (Doc. 9). Plaintiff has failed to keep the Court advised of his

current address and has failed to prosecute this case. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc.

8) as the Order of the Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint and action are dismissed without

prejudice.

DATED this 7th day of June, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-01145-MHM Document 10 Filed 06/13/06 Page 2 of 2