Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01297/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01297-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Michael Vincent Cisneros (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against 

Defendant Neubarth for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s medical needs in violation of the Eighth 

Amendment. On October 1, 2013, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order. Pursuant to 

that order, the deadline to amend pleadings is April 1, 2014, the deadline to complete discovery is June 

1, 2014, and the dispositive motion deadline is August 11, 2014. (ECF No. 23.) 

On December 30, 2013, Plaintiff filed the instant motion requesting an extension of all 

deadlines in this matter. Plaintiff asserts that he was the victim of an alleged sexual assault in 

November. While the event is being investigated, he has been placed in administrative segregation 

and his legal materials have been confiscated. Plaintiff seeks a statement of the relevant deadlines in 

this action and requests an extension of all deadlines. (ECF No. 29.) 

MICHAEL VINCENT CISNEROS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

J. NEUBARTH,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:11-cv-01297-LJO-BAM PC

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND ALL 

DEADLINES

(ECF No. 29)

Case 1:11-cv-01297-LJO-BAM Document 30 Filed 01/03/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court takes Plaintiff’s allegations seriously, but does not find good cause to modify the 

Discovery and Scheduling Order to extend all deadlines. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). As noted above, 

the discovery deadline does not expire until June 1, 2014, and the dispositive motion deadline does not 

expire until August 11, 2014. At this time, Plaintiff has not provided cause, beyond a temporary 

confiscation of his legal property, to modify the Discovery and Scheduling Order deadlines. Plaintiff 

also has not identified a particular deadline that he will be unable to meet. Plaintiff may renew his 

motion in the future if, despite his diligence, he is unable to meet a particular deadline in the 

Discovery and Scheduling Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2014 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01297-LJO-BAM Document 30 Filed 01/03/14 Page 2 of 2