Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-02538/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-02538-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN RONDA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARTEMIS ACQUISITION 

CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-02538-DMR 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 

TO SET ASIDE CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. No. 116

The court has received Plaintiff's motion to set aside the court's January 15, 2015 Order of 

Conditional Dismissal. [Docket No. 116.] In his motion, Plaintiff argues that he will be unable to 

pursue enforcement of the default judgment against Defendant Artemis Acquisition Corporation if 

the case is dismissed in its entirety. However, he does not cite any legal authority for the motion 

or the relief requested, nor any evidence to support his contention that he will be unable to pursue 

enforcement of the judgment. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-4, 7-5. Moreover, the court notes that a 

separate judgment as to Defendant Artemis Acquisition Corporation was entered on March 2, 

2015. [Docket No. 118.] Therefore, Plaintiff's motion to set aside the conditional dismissal is 

denied without prejudice. Any re-filed motion to set aside the dismissal must comply with the 

Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 2, 2015

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:13-cv-02538-DMR Document 120 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 1