Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01203/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01203-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAUL ESCARCEGA,

Petitioner,

v.

BEN CURRY, warden,

Respondent. /

No. C 08-1203 SI (pr)

ORDER PERMITTING

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit addressed important issues relating to federal

review of parole decisions, Hayward v Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22,

2010) (en banc). The court will provide each party an opportunity to submit a supplemental brief (not

to exceed 15 pages in length) explaining his views of how the Hayward en banc decision applies to this

parole denial habeas case. The court sets the following schedule:

1. No later than May 10, 2010, respondent must send to petitioner a copy of the Hayward

en banc decision. 

2. No later than May 28, 2010, respondent must file and serve any supplemental brief on

the impact of Hayward on this action. 

3. No later than July 2, 2010, petitioner must file and serve any supplemental brief on the

impact of Hayward on this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 27, 2010 

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-01203-SI Document 12 Filed 04/28/10 Page 1 of 1