Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965-35/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYNOSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ATOPTECH, INC.,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

No. C-13-02965 DMR

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL

SUBMISSION RE: JOINT DISCOVERY

LETTER [DOCKET NO. 193]

Before the court is a joint discovery letter filed by the parties. [Docket No. 193.] In the

letter, Synopsys moves to compel ATopTech to respond to Synopsys’ discovery requests, some of

which reference “Accused Instrumentalities.” This term is not defined in the joint discovery letter. 

By February 11, 2015 at 12:00 p.m., the parties shall meet and confer and file with the

court a letter of no more than one page providing Synopsys’ definition of “Accused

Instrumentalities” as used in Synopsys’ discovery requests.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2015

 DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 226 Filed 02/10/15 Page 1 of 1