Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01394/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01394-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRYL FUNDERBURK, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

W.J. SULLIVAN, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:07-cv-01394 OWW-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 10)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus,

which the Court construes as filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On May 22, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case issued Findings and

Recommendations recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for lack

of exhaustion. (Doc. 10). The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fifteen days from the date of service of

that order. To date, the parties in this case have not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

///

///

Case 1:07-cv-01394-OWW -TAG Document 11 Filed 06/23/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued May 22, 2008 (Doc. 10), are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01394-OWW -TAG Document 11 Filed 06/23/08 Page 2 of 2