Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00233/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00233-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN BIGOSKI ODOM,

Petitioner,

v.

D.G. ADAMS, Warden,

Respondent.

No. 2:17-cv-0233 JAM AC P

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 4, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 32. 

Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 33.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

/////

Case 2:17-cv-00233-TLN-AC Document 36 Filed 01/23/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 4, 2019 (ECF No. 32), are adopted

in full; 

2. Petitioner’s request for a stay (ECF No. 31 at 3) is denied;

3. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 27) is granted;

4. Claims Two and Four of the first amended petition are dismissed without prejudice as

unexhausted; 

5. Claims Five, Six, and Seven of the first amended petition are dismissed as untimely;

6. Respondent shall file a response to Claims One and Three of the first amended petition

within sixty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. An answer shall

be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in the 

petition. See Rule 5, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. Petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served 

within thirty days after service of the answer. 

DATED: January 22, 2020

/s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 2:17-cv-00233-TLN-AC Document 36 Filed 01/23/20 Page 2 of 2