Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-03528/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-03528-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KENNETH ADRIAN FULLER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

KAREN THOMPSON, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 19-cv-03528-YGR (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE

Plaintiff filed the present pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On October 15, 2019, mail sent to Plaintiff by the Clerk of the Court was returned as 

undeliverable with a notation, “RTS NIC,” which stands for “Return to Sender, Not in Custody.” 

Dkt. 10. Thus, it seems that Plaintiff has been released from custody. 

On November 22, 2019, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address to a non-prison 

address. Dkt. 11. 

In an Order dated January 13, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a non-prisoner in 

forma pauperis application form. Dkt. 12. The Clerk mailed a copy of the January 13, 2020 

Order to Plaintiff at his non-prison address. See Dkt. 12-1. 

On February 21, 2020, the January 13, 2020 Order mailed to Plaintiff was returned to the 

Clerk with a notation that it was undeliverable for the following reasons: “RETURN TO 

SENDER. ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN. UNABLE TO FORWARD.” Dkt. 13. To date, 

Plaintiff has not updated his address with the Court or submitted any further pleadings in this case. 

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11 a party proceeding pro se whose address 

Case 4:19-cv-03528-YGR Document 14 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

changes while an action is pending must promptly file a notice of change of address specifying the 

new address. See L.R. 3-11(a). The Court may dismiss without prejudice a complaint when: 

(1) mail directed to the pro se party by the Court has been returned to the Court as not deliverable, 

and (2) the Court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written communication from the 

pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b). 

More than sixty days have passed since the mail directed to Plaintiff by the Court was 

returned as undeliverable. The Court has not received a notice from Plaintiff of a new address. 

Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the 

Northern District Local Rules. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

______________________________________ 

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 

United States District Judge 

May 29, 2020

Case 4:19-cv-03528-YGR Document 14 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 2