Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00253/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00253-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIFFANI GRANT,

Plaintiff,

v.

COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, etal.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:16-CV-00253-LJO-BAM

ORDER SETTING MANDATORY

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 2016

TIME: 9:30 AM

CTRM: #8 (6th Floor)

BARBARA A. McAULIFFE

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Rule 16, Fed.R.Civ.P., requires the Court to enter a Scheduling Conference Order within 

90 days of the date of the Complaint being served upon the defendant. Therefore, it is ordered that 

you appear for a formal Scheduling Conference before United States Magistrate Judge Barbara A. 

McAuliffe, in Courtroom 8 at the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 

93721. 

The Court is unable to conduct a scheduling conference until the defendant(s) 

has/have been served with the summons and complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff(s) shall diligently 

pursue service of summons and complaint and dismiss those defendants against whom plaintiff(s) 

will not pursue claims. Plaintiff(s) shall promptly file proofs of service of the summons and 

complaint so the Court has a record of service. Counsel are referred to Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 4, 

regarding the requirement of timely service of the complaint. Failure to serve summons and 

complaint timely may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of unserved 

Case 1:16-cv-00253-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

defendants. 

Due to the mandates of Rule 16, this Order may be served upon counsel for the 

plaintiff(s) before appearances of defendant(s) are due. It is the obligation of counsel for the 

plaintiff(s) to serve a copy of this Order on the defendant(s), or, if identified, on their counsel, 

promptly upon receipt of this Order, and to file an appropriate proof of such service with the 

Court, in compliance with Rule 135(a) of the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of 

California. 

Attendance at the Scheduling Conference is mandatory by each party not 

represented by counsel or by retained counsel. Only counsel who are thoroughly familiar with 

the facts and the law of the instant case, and who have full authority to bind his or her client, shall 

appear. Trial counsel should participate in this Scheduling Conference whenever possible. It 

may be necessary for counsel to spend as much as 45 minutes in this Conference. 

A Joint Scheduling Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel/pro se 

parties, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling 

Conference, and shall be e−mailed, in Word format, to bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov.

For reference purposes, the Court requires that counsels' Joint Scheduling Report 

indicate the date, time, and courtroom of the Scheduling Conference. This information is to be 

placed opposite the caption on the first page of the Report. Among other things, counsel will be 

expected to discuss the possibility of settlement. Counsel are to discuss settlement thoroughly 

with each other before undertaking the preparation of the Joint Scheduling Report and engaging 

in extensive discovery. However, even if settlement negotiations are progressing, counsel are 

expected to comply with the requirements of this Order unless otherwise excused by the Court. If 

the case is settled, please promptly inform the Court, and counsels' presence, as well as the Joint 

Scheduling Report, will not be required. 

Counsel may request that their attendance be by telephonic conference. If 

two or more parties wish to appear telephonically, counsel shall decide which will be responsible 

for making prior arrangements for the conference call and shall initiate the call at the 

above−designated time. After all parties are on the line, the call should then be placed to Judge 

Case 1:16-cv-00253-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 09/29/16 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

McAuliffe’s chambers at 

(559) 499-5789. Additionally, counsel are directed to indicate on the face page of 

their Joint Scheduling Report that the conference will be telephonic.

At least twenty (20) days prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, trial 

counsel for all parties shall conduct and conclude a conference at a time and place arranged by 

counsel for the plaintiff(s). This conference preferably should be a personal conference between 

all counsel but, due to the distances involved in this District, a telephonic conference call 

involving all counsel/pro se parties is permissible. The Joint Scheduling Report shall respond to 

the following items by corresponding numbered paragraphs:

Form and Contents of the Joint Scheduling Report

1. Summary of the factual and legal contentions set forth in the pleadings of 

each party, including the relief sought by any party presently before the Court.

2. A proposed deadline for amendments to pleadings shall be included. Any 

proposed amendment to the pleadings presently on file shall be filed by its proponent 

contemporaneously with the Scheduling Conference Report. If the matter cannot be resolved at 

the Scheduling Conference, the matter will be set as a Motion to Amend in accordance with the 

Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California.

3. A summary of the uncontested and contested facts.

4. A summary of the legal issues as to which there is no dispute, e.g., 

jurisdiction, venue, applicable federal or state law, etc., as well as summary of the disputed legal 

issues.

5. The status of all matters which are presently set before the Court, e.g., 

hearings of motions, etc.

6. A complete and detailed discovery plan addressing the following:

a. A date for the exchange of initial disclosures required by Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 26(a)(1) or a statement that disclosures have already been exchanged;

b. A firm cut-off date for non-expert discovery;

c. A firm date for disclosure of expert witnesses as required by Fed. 

Case 1:16-cv-00253-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 09/29/16 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2);

d. A firm cut-off date for expert witness discovery;

e. Any proposed changes in the limits on discovery imposed by Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 26(b); 30(a)(2)(A), (B); 30(d); or 33(a);

f. Whether the parties anticipate the need for a protective order 

relating to the discovery of information relating to a trade secret or other confidential research, 

development, or commercial information;

g. Any issues or proposals relating to the timing, sequencing, phasing 

or scheduling of discovery;

h. Whether the parties anticipate the need to take discovery outside the 

United States and, if so, a description of the proposed discovery;

i. Whether any party anticipates video and/or sound recording of 

depositions; and

j. Whether the parties foresee a need for a Mid-Discovery Status 

Report and Conference and, if so, a proposed date for conducting the conference.

7. Discovery relating to Electronic, Digital and/or Magnetic data. Prior to a 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, counsel should carefully investigate their respective client's 

information management system so that they are knowledgeable as to its operating, including 

how information is stored and how it can be retrieved. Counsel shall also conduct a reasonable 

review of their respective client's computer files to ascertain the contents thereof, including 

archival and legacy data (outdated formats or media), and disclose in initial discovery (selfexecuting routine discovery) the computer-based evidence which may be used to support claims 

or defenses. A party seeking discovery of computer-based information shall notify the opposing 

party immediately, but no later than the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, of that fact and identify 

as clearly as possible the categories of information which may be sought.

8. Duty to Meet and Confer. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the 

following matters during the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference:

a. Computer-based information (in general): The parties shall attempt 

Case 1:16-cv-00253-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 09/29/16 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to agree on steps the parties will take to segregate and preserve computer-based information in 

order to avoid accusations of spoliation. 

b. E-mail information: The parties shall attempt to agree as to the 

scope of e-mail discovery and attempt to agree upon an e-mail search protocol. This should 

include an agreement regarding inadvertent production of privileged e-mail messages.

c. Deleted information: The parties shall confer and attempt to agree 

whether or not restoration of deleted information may be necessary, the extent to which 

restoration of deleted information is needed, and who will bear the costs of restoration; and 

d. Back-up data: The parties shall attempt to agree whether or not 

back-up data may be necessary, the extent to which backup data is needed and who will bear the 

cost of obtaining back-up data.

9. Dates agreed to by all counsel for:

a. Filing non-dispositive and dispositive pre-trial motions with the 

understanding that motions (except motions in limine or other trial motions) will not be 

entertained after the agreed upon date, which shall be no later than 10 weeks prior to the proposed 

Pre-Trial Conference date.

b. Pre-Trial Conference Date. (This date shall be no later than 45 days 

prior to the proposed trial date.)

c. Trial date.

All of these dates should be considered firm dates. Dates should be set to allow 

the court to decide any matters under submission before the Pre-Trial Conference is set.

10. At the conference referred to above, counsel are encouraged to discuss 

settlement, and the Court will expect a statement in the Joint Scheduling Report as to the 

possibility of settlement. The parties shall indicate when they desire a settlement conference, e.g., 

before further discovery, after discovery, after pre-trial motions, etc.

11. A statement as to whether the case is a jury or non-jury case. If the parties 

disagree as to whether a jury trial has been timely demanded or whether one is available on some 

or all of the claims, the statement shall include a summary of each party's position.

Case 1:16-cv-00253-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 09/29/16 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12. An estimate of the number of trial days is required. If the parties cannot 

agree, each party shall give his or her best estimate. In estimating the number of trial days, the 

parties should keep in mind that this court is normally able to devote the entire day to trial.

13. Whether either party requests bifurcation or phasing of trial or has any 

other suggestion for shortening or expediting discovery, pre-trial motions or trial.

14. Whether this matter is related to any matter pending in this court or any 

other court, including bankruptcy court.

15. Joint Scheduling Reports are to be e-mailed, in Word format, to 

bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov.

Important Chambers' Information

The parties are directed to the courtroom calendar on the court's website at 

www.caed.uscourts.gov for specific information regarding Chambers' procedures. Select 

“McAuliffe” from the pull down menu and then click on "More Calendaring Information." 

Information about law and motion, scheduling conferences, telephonic appearances, and 

discovery disputes is provided at this link.

Should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to appear at the Mandatory 

Scheduling Conference, or fail to comply with the directions as set forth above, an ex parte 

hearing may be held and judgment of dismissal, default, or other appropriate judgment 

may be entered, or sanctions, including contempt of court, may be imposed and/or ordered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 29, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00253-LJO-BAM Document 10 Filed 09/29/16 Page 6 of 6