Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00808/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00808-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID JACKSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ARIE EVANS, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-0808 GEB AC (PS) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 On September 6, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should 

not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s prior order. 

ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has not respond to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to prosecute this 

case. 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 

prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s orders. See Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. R. 110. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one (21) 

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

Case 2:15-cv-00808-GEB-AC Document 7 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: October 27, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-00808-GEB-AC Document 7 Filed 10/28/15 Page 2 of 2