Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02506/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02506-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2506 WBS DAD P

vs.

LEA ANN CHRONES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 14, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed April 29, 2010, denying plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel and

permitting plaintiff to file an amended complaint consistent with the order. Pursuant to E.D.

Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or

contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed April 29, 2010 (Doc. No. 14), is affirmed. 

DATED: May 20, 2010

Case 2:09-cv-02506-WBS-DAD Document 18 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 1