Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00379/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00379-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K

WO SC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cedric Ah Sing, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Corrections Corp. Of America, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 12-0379-PHX-GMS (MEA)

ORDER

Plaintiff Cedric Ah Sing, who is a Hawaiian inmate confined in the Saguaro

Correctional Center (SCC), a Corrections Corporation of American (CCA) facility, in Eloy,

Arizona, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave

to amend.

I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

The Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $40.00. The remainder of the fee will be

collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time the amount

in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate

Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees according

to the statutory formula. 

II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 1 of 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 2 -

a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised

claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may

be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). 

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not

demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendantunlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).

“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory

statements, do not suffice.” Id.

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content

that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the

misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for

relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial

experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual

allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there

are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951. But as the

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts must “continue

to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th Cir. 2010). A

“complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards than formal

pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per

curiam)).

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts,

a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the

action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 2 of 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 3 -

should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would

undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225,

231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was

required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint

for failure to state a claim with leave to amend, because the Complaint may possibly be saved

by amendment.

III. Complaint

Plaintiff alleges three counts for violation of his mail and property rights and

retaliation. Plaintiff sues CCA and the following SCC employees: Assistant Warden Jody

Bradley and Mail Room Officer C. Robertson. Plaintiff seeks declaratory, injunctive,

compensatory, and punitive relief. 

All of Plaintiff’s claims are predicated on the following: on January 13, 2012, he

received a notice of prohibited correspondence, i.e., denied correspondence, on the basis that

the correspondence “Plans to introduce contraband into or out of the facility” and posed

“Threats to the safety and security of facility order, discipline, or rehabilitation.” According

to Plaintiff, the correspondence was sent from the Hawaii Department of the Auditor and

Plaintiff disputes that it posed a safety or security threat.

IV. Failure to State a Claim

A plaintiff may seek relief for violations of his federal constitutional or statutory rights

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts

supporting that (1) the conduct about which he complains was committed by a person acting

under the color of state law and (2) the conduct deprived him of a federal constitutional or

statutory right. Wood v. Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1989). In addition, a

plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific injury as a result of the conduct of a particular

defendant and he must allege an affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that

defendant. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).

A. CCA

Plaintiff sues CCA, a private corporation for violations of federal and state law rights.

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 3 of 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 4 -

Claims under § 1983 may be directed at “bodies politic and corporate.” Monell v. New York

City Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 686, 688-89 (1978). Under the Civil Rights Act of 1871,

Congress intended municipal corporations and other local government units to be included

among those persons to whom § 1983 applies. Id. at 2035. That proposition has been

extended to corporations that act under color of state law. See Sable Commc’s of Cal. Inc.

v. Pacific Tel. & Tel Co., 890 F.2d 184, 189 (9th Cir. 1989) (willful joint participation of

private corporation in joint activity with state or its agent taken under color of state law). 

There are four ways to find state action by a private entity for purposes of § 1983: (1)

the private actor performs a public function, (2) the private actor engages in joint activity

with a state actor, (3) a private actor is subject to governmental compulsion or coercion, or

(4) there is a governmental nexus with the private actor. Kirtley v. Rainey, 326 F.3d 1088,

1093 (9th Cir. 2003). Under the public function test, “the function [performed by the private

actor] must traditionally be the exclusive prerogative of the state.” Parks Sch. of Bus., Inc.

v. Symington, 51 F.3d 1480, 1486 (9th Cir. 1995); see Kirtley, 326 F.3d at 1093; Lee v. Katz,

276 F.3d 550, 554-555 (9th Cir. 2002). A privately owned corporation that operates prisons

pursuant to a contract with a state performs a public function that is traditionally the

exclusive prerogative of the state. But, to state a claim under § 1983 against a private entity

performing a traditional public function, a plaintiff must allege facts to support that his

constitutional rights were violated as a result of a policy, decision, or custom promulgated

or endorsed by the private entity. See Buckner v. Toro, 116 F.3d 450, 452 (11th Cir. 1997);

Street v. Corrections Corp. of Am., 102 F.3d 810, 814 (6th Cir. 1996); Wall v. Dion, 257 F.

Supp.2d 316, 319 (D. Me 2003); see also Austin v. Paramount Parks, Inc., 195 F.3d 715, 727

(4th Cir. 1999); Rojas v. Alexander’s Dep’t Store, Inc. , 924 F.2d 406, 408 (2d Cir. 1990);

Lux by Lux v. Hansen, 886 F.2d 1064, 1067 (8th Cir. 1989). 

CCA performs a traditional public function, i.e., operating a prison. However,

Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support that CCA promulgated or endorsed a policy or custom

that resulted in the alleged violation of Plaintiff’s federal rights. Further, there is no

respondeat superior liability under § 1983, so a defendant’s position as the employer of

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 4 of 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 5 -

someone who allegedly violated a plaintiff’s constitutional rights does not make it liable.

Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989). Because

Plaintiff fails to allege any facts against CCA, it will be dismissed. 

B. Count I

Plaintiff designates Count I as a claim concerning incoming mail. Defendant

Robertson opened the mail from the Auditor outside of Plaintiff’s presence, which Plaintiff

contends was improper because the mail was privileged and confidential. Defendant Bradley

denied Plaintiff’s appeal concerning withholding of that mail. 

Inmates retain First Amendment rights not inconsistent with their status as prisoners,

or with legitimate penological objectives of the corrections system. See Shaw v. Murphy,

532 U.S. 223, 231 (2001); Clement v. California Dep’t of Corr., 364 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th

Cir. 2004). Those rights include a First Amendment right to send and receive mail.

Witherow v. Paff, 52 F.3d 264, 265 (9th Cir. 1999). However, that “right is subject to

‘substantial limitations and restrictions in order to allow prison officials to achieve legitimate

correctional goals and maintain institutional security.’” Prison Legal News v. Lehman, 397

F.3d 692, 699 (9th Cir. 2005); Morrison v. Hall, 261 F.3d 896 (9th Cir. 2001); Prison Legal

News v. Cook, 238 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 2001). Prison officials may examine a prisoner’s

communications without infringing upon his rights. United States v. Wilson, 447 F.2d 1, 8

n. 4 (9th Cir.1971). Thus, courts have upheld policies that call for inspection of non-legal

mail for contraband. Smith v. Boyd, 945 F.2d 1041, 1043 (8th Cir.1991); Witherow v. Paff,

52 F.3d 264 (9th Cir. 1995); Gaines v. Lane, 790 F.2d 1299, 1304 (7th Cir.1986). Only mail

from an inmate’s attorney constitutes “legal mail,” thus, for example, mail from the court is

not “legal mail.” See Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1084 (9th Cir. 1996); Martin v. Brewer,

830 F.2d 76, 78 (7th Cir. 1987).

Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, mail from the Department of the Auditor did not

constitute legal mail and could properly be opened outside of Plaintiff’s presence without

violating his constitutional rights. Further, absent additional allegations, the correspondence

was withheld for legitimate penological reasons. Plaintiff thus fails to state a First

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 5 of 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 6 -

Amendment violation as to Robertson. 

To the extent that Plaintiff seeks relief against Bradley for denying his appeal,

Plaintiff also fails to state a claim. Where a defendant’s only involvement in allegedly

unconstitutional conduct is the denial of administrative grievances, the failure to intervene

on a prisoner’s behalf to remedy the alleged unconstitutional behavior does not amount to

active unconstitutional behavior for purposes of § 1983. Shehee v. Luttrell, 199 F.3d 295,

300 (6th Cir. 1999); accord Mintun v. Blades, No. CV-06-139-BLW, 2008 WL 711636, at

*7 (D. Idaho Mar. 14, 2008); Stocker v. Warden, No. 1:07-CV-00589, 2009 WL 981323, at

*10 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2009). For the reasons discussed, Count I will be dismissed for

failure to state a claim.

C. Count II

Plaintiff designates Count II as a claim concerning the deprivation of property.

Plaintiff complains that he was wrongfully deprived of incoming mail, i.e., the Auditor’s

report. In Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 541 (1981), the Supreme Court held that due

process is not violated when a state employee negligently deprives an individual of property,

as long as the state makes available a meaningful post-deprivation remedy. The rationale

underlying Parratt is that pre-deprivation procedures are impractical when the deprivation

of property occurs through negligent conduct of a state employee because a state cannot

know when such deprivations will occur. Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984).

However, “[w]here a government official’s act causing injury to life, liberty, or property is

merely negligent, ‘no procedure for compensation is constitutionally required.’” Daniels v.

Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 333 (1986) (emphasis added) (quoting Parratt, 451 U.S. at 548). 

The logic of Parratt has been extended to intentional unauthorized deprivations of

property by state actors because a state also cannot know when such deprivations will occur.

Hudson, 468 U.S. at 533. As with negligent deprivations, where a state makes available a

meaningful post-deprivation remedy, such as a common-law tort suit against a prison

employee for intentional unauthorized deprivations, a federal due process claim is precluded.

Hudson, 468 U.S. at 534-35; King v. Massarweh, 782 F.2d 825, 826 (9th Cir. 1986). 

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 6 of 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 7 -

If Plaintiff is attempting to allege an intentional unauthorized deprivation of property

by prison staff, he fails to state a constitutional claim. Under Arizona state law, Plaintiff has

an available post-deprivation remedy via an action for conversion. See Howland v. State,

818 P.2d 1169, 1172-73 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991) (prison officials’ confiscation of and failure

to return prisoner’s personal property states a state law claim for conversion); see also Wright

v. Riveland, 219 F.3d 905, 918 (9th Cir. 2000) (prisoners in Washington have adequate postdeprivation remedies to challenge deductions from inmate accounts by utilizing the prison

grievance procedure or by filing a state tort action).

If, on the other hand, Plaintiff is attempting to allege a deprivation of property by

prison staff pursuant to prison regulations or policies, he may be able to state a Due Process

violation. To state a federal constitutional claim, Plaintiff must allege facts to support that

a deprivation was (a) authorized by prison policies or regulations, (b) by a Defendant, and

(c) absent pre-deprivation procedures. Plaintiff alleges the correspondence was withheld as

posing a threat to the safety or security of SCC, seemingly pursuant to prison policies.

However, Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support that he was denied any pre-deprivation

procedures. In fact, he indicates that he unsuccessfully appealed the withholding. In short,

if Plaintiff complains of the deprivation of property pursuant to prison policies, he fails to

allege facts to support that he was denied any process due. Accordingly, Plaintiff fails to

state a claim for violation of due process and Count II will be dismissed. 

D. Count III

Plaintiff designates Count III as a claim for retaliation. He contends that Robertson

and Bradley confiscated his incoming mail, i.e., the State Auditor’s report, in retaliation for

Plaintiff having filed a lawsuit, Ah Sing v. Corrections Corp. of America, No. CV12-0034-

PHX-GMS (D. Ariz. Jan. 5, 2012). 

To state a constitutional claim for retaliation, a plaintiff must allege that a defendant

acting under color of state law took adverse action against him because he engaged in

constitutionally-protected conduct, the adverse action was not narrowly tailored to advance

legitimate goals, and the adverse action chilled the plaintiff’s exercise of his First

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 7 of 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 8 -

Amendment rights or caused him to suffer more than minimal harm. Rhodes v. Robinson,

408 F.3d 559, 567-58 (9th Cir. 2005); see also Hines v. Gomez, 108 F.3d 265, 267 (9th Cir.

1997) (retaliation claims requires an inmate must show (1) that the prison official acted in

retaliation for the exercise of a constitutionally-protected right, and (2) that the action

“advanced no legitimate penological interest”).

As discussed above, the Auditor’s report did not constitute legal mail that had to be

opened in Plaintiff’s presence. Further, absent additional facts, the report was withheld for

legitimate penological reasons and Plaintiff was afforded the process due. While Plaintiff

asserts that his mail was withheld in retaliation for filing CV12-0034, the Court notes that

case was dismissed on February 21, 2012 after Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or to

submit a properly completed in forma pauperis application. Ah Sing, CV12-0034 (D. Ariz.

Feb. 21, 2012). That is, the case was dismissed prior to service of the complaint on any

defendant. Plaintiff otherwise fails to allege facts to support that any Defendant knew of the

filing of that case or facts that support an inference that the Auditor’s report was confiscated

in retaliation for Plaintiff’s filing of that case. For these reasons, Plaintiff fails to state a

claim for retaliation. 

V. Leave to Amend

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state

a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first

amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail

Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails

to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended complaint and dismiss this

action without further notice to Plaintiff.

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First

Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.

A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 8 of 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 9 -

F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542,

1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original complaint as

nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original

complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d

565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

VI. Warnings

A. Release

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.

Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay

the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result

in dismissal of this action.

B. Address Changes

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

action.

C. Copies

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice

to Plaintiff.

D. Possible “Strike”

Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails

to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the

dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil

judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior

occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a

court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious,

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 9 of 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 10 -

or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

E. Possible Dismissal

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at

1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the

Court).

IT IS ORDERED: 

(1) Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. (Doc. 2.)

(2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency,

Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $40.00.

(3) The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff has

30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with

this Order.

(4) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of

Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice

that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

(5) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil

rights complaint by a prisoner.

DATED this 11th day of April, 2012.

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 10 of 20
Revised 3/9/07 1

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint 

in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated

persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These

complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form

should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state

conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas

corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence,

you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that

entered the judgment. 

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by

incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or

neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All

questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If

needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard

letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and

number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional

or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to

cite law. 

3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of

a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.

4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately

pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the

“Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in

Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.

5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and

of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court

if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be

identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.

6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined

when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined

in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were

confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott

Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file

in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing

fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 11 of 20
2

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR Tucson Division:

U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. District Court Clerk

U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500

401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 405 West Congress Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing

of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your

mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.

8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you

submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis).

Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma

pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date

a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed.

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a

certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed

this (month, day, year) to:

Name: 

Address: 

 Attorney for Defendant(s)

 

(Signature)

9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,

you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave

(permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R.

Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to

amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an

amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv

15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are

considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison

Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time.

10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint.

Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use

to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.

11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff

of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written

pleading or motion.

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 12 of 20
3

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.

HEADING:

1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing

address on the lines provided.

2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you

name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line,

write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the

names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-

A” at the bottom.

3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED”

in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do

so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are

seeking only injunctive relief.

Part A. JURISDICTION:

1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics

Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of

that authority. 

2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights

occurred. 

3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the

spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the

necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,”

“2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.

Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:

You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while

you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces

provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary

information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-

B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.

Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:

You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to

allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three

counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate

page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page

5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 13 of 20
4

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the

violation of only one civil right per count.

2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your

claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,”

you must identify the specific issue involved.

3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must

state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each

individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you

must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which

the act(s) occurred, if possible.

4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.

5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies

before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you

should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or

administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures

were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.

Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:

Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. 

SIGNATURE:

You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign

the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not

bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE

You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your

complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper

space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional

pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach

additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and

number the pages.

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 14 of 20
Revised 3/9/07 1 550/555

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

)

 , )

(Full Name of Plaintiff) Plaintiff, )

)

 vs. ) CASE NO. 

) (To be supplied by the Clerk)

(1) , )

(Full Name of Defendant) )

(2) , )

) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

(3) ,) BY A PRISONER

)

(4) , ) G Original Complaint

Defendant(s). ) G First Amended Complaint

G Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them. ) G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION

1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:

G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983

G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

G Other: .

2. Institution/city where violation occurred: .

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 15 of 20
2

B. DEFENDANTS

1. Name of first Defendant: . The first Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

2. Name of second Defendant: . The second Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

3. Name of third Defendant: . The third Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

4. Name of fourth Defendant: . The fourth Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS

1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? G Yes G No

2. If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed? . Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:

1. Parties: v. 

2. Court and case number: .

3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.

b. Second prior lawsuit:

1. Parties: v. 

2. Court and case number: .

3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.

c. Third prior lawsuit:

1. Parties: v. 

2. Court and case number: .

3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 16 of 20
3

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

COUNT I

1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: 

.

2. Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.

G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what

each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without

citing legal authority or arguments.

.

4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.

5. Administrative Remedies:

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available

at your institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why

you did not. 

.

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 17 of 20
4

COUNT II

1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: 

.

2. Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.

G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what

each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without

citing legal authority or arguments.

.

4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.

5. Administrative Remedies.

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available

at your institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why

you did not. 

.

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 18 of 20
5

COUNT III

1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: 

.

2. Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.

G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what

each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without

citing legal authority or arguments.

.

4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.

5. Administrative Remedies.

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available

at your institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why

you did not. 

.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 19 of 20
6

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF

State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on 

DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or

other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES

All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may

attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent

applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued

and number all pages.

Case 2:12-cv-00379-GMS--MEA Document 5 Filed 04/11/12 Page 20 of 20