Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-md-02143/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-md-02143-135/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

CASE NO. 3:10-md-2143 RS

ORDER RE MOTION FOR ATTORNEY 

FEES AND INCENTIVE PAYMENTS

The Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs move, without opposition or objection, for an attorney fee 

award and incentive payments in connection with the settlements reached between those plaintiffs 

and certain defendants. By prior order, the matter was continued in light of a concern that it would

be premature to rule on the fee and incentive payment issues in the absence of information regarding 

the number of claims made and the estimated payout per class member. Plaintiffs have now 

provided that information, and the matter has been submitted without oral argument pursuant to 

Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Upon review of the motion, including the supplementary filing, and in light 

of the entire record, it is appropriate to grant the motion for all of the reasons set out in the proposed 

order submitted by the moving parties. That order will therefore be entered herewith.

Case 3:10-md-02143-RS Document 1657 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 23, 2015

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-md-02143-RS Document 1657 Filed 07/23/15 Page 2 of 2