Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01297/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01297-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IMPRIMIS INTERNATIONAL INC. CASE NO. CIV S-04-1297 FCD/DAD

Plaintiff,

ORDER VACATING SUBSTITUTION

vs. OF COUNSEL

ROBERT B. FRAIDENBURGH, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

On June 2, 2005 defendant’s counsel, Mr. Shawn Krogh,

submitted a substitution of counsel for court approval. On

June 6, 2005 the substitution was approved and the order was

served on all parties. 

However, after further review by the court the order

was issued in error. The substitution of counsel does not

comply with Local Rule 83-182(d) which requires a noticed

motion to withdraw in these circumstances which defendant

will be left in propria persona. 

Accordingly, the order of substitution is VACATED. 

Defendant’s counsel, Mr. Shawn Krogh, shall bring a properly

///

Case 2:04-cv-01297-FCD-DAD Document 22 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

noticed motion in accordance with Local Rule 83-182 and 

78-230 seeking withdrawal of counsel of record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:June 7, 2005

/s Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01297-FCD-DAD Document 22 Filed 06/07/05 Page 2 of 2