Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04908/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04908-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

STIP AND [PROP] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR OPP, REPLY, AND HEARING ON MOT TO DISMISS 

Case No. C-06-4908 JW RS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Robert S. Green (State Bar No. 136183) 

GREEN WELLING LLP 

595 Market Street, Suite 2750 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 477-6700 

Facsimile: (415) 477-6710 

cand.uscourts@classcounsel.com 

William B. Federman 

FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 

10205 North Pennsylvania Avenue 

Oklahoma City, OK 73120 

Telephone: (405) 235-1560 

Facsimile: (405) 239-2112 

wfederman@aol.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

LEO J. BIERMANN and ANDREW I. SMITH, 

Derivatively on Behalf of FOXHOLLOW 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TOMOAKI HINOHARA, RYAN D. DRANT, 

JEFFREY B. CHILD, JOHN B. SIMPSON, 

SANFORD FITCH, ROBERT W.THOMAS, 

RICHARD M. FERRAI AND MYRTLE S. POTT

 Defendants, 

and 

FOXHOLLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Nominal Defendant. 

Case No. C-06-4908 JW RS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

OPPOSITION, REPLY, AND 

HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS 

Case 5:06-cv-04908-JW Document 20 Filed 05/07/07 Page 1 of 3
STIP AND [PROP] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR OPP, REPLY, AND HEARING ON MOT TO DISMISS 

Case No. C-06-4908 JW RS 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to a briefing schedule entered by the Court on 

November 8, 2006, providing that, among other things, Plaintiffs will file an amended complaint no 

later than January 5, 2007, Defendants shall file an Answer or other responsive leading within 60 

days of the filing of Plaintiffs’ amended complaint; if the Defendants file a motion to dismiss, 

Plaintiffs shall file its opposition thereto within 60 days of service of Defendants’ motion to dismiss; 

Defendants shall file any reply thereto within 30 days after the service of Plaintiffs’ opposition; and 

the Case Management Conference shall be continued until 30 days after the Court’s ruling on the 

motion to dismiss; 

 WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on January 5, 2007; 

 WHEREAS Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on March 6, 2007; 

WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is currently due May 7, 

2007; 

WHEREAS Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to dismiss is 

currently due June 6, 2007; 

WHEREAS the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is currently set to be heard on 

August 6, 2007; 

WHEREAS, the parties in this action have met and conferred and agree that it is in their 

mutual interest to extend the time for the Plaintiffs’ to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss, to extend the time for Plaintiffs’ to file their Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition, and to extend 

the time for the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; 

 WHEREAS, the proposed modifications to the briefing and hearing schedule will not 

prejudice any party and will not cause undue delay; 

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED THAT: 

1. Plaintiffs will file their Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss on or before 

June 11, 2007; 

2. Defendants will file their Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion 

to Dismiss on or before July 11, 2007; 

3. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be heard on September 10, 2007; and 

Case 5:06-cv-04908-JW Document 20 Filed 05/07/07 Page 2 of 3
STIP AND [PROP] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR OPP, REPLY, AND HEARING ON MOT TO DISMISS 

Case No. C-06-4908 JW RS 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4. The Case Management Conference shall be postponed until 30 days after the 

Court’s ruling on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 

DATED: May 4, 2007 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Brook Dooley 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

DATED: May 4, 2007 GREEN WELLING LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Robert S. Green 

 

 FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 

 William B. Federman 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

GENERAL ORDER 45(X)

 I, Robert S. Green, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45 (X)(B), I hereby attest 

that Brook Dooley concurred in this filing. 

Dated: May 4, 2007 By: /s/ 

 Robert S. Green 

ORDER 

 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May ______, 2007 ______________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

7

Case 5:06-cv-04908-JW Document 20 Filed 05/07/07 Page 3 of 3