Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04908/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04908-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLFS’ OPPOSITION AND DEFS’ REPLY

Case No. C-06-4908 JW RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Robert S. Green (State Bar No. 136183)

GREEN WELLING LLP

595 Market St., Suite 2750

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 477-6700

Facsimile: (415) 477-6710

cand.uscourts@classcounsel.com

William B. Federman

FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 

10205 North Pennsylvania Avenue

Oklahoma City, OK 73120

Telephone: (405) 235-1560

Facsimile: (405) 239-2112

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

LEO J. BIERMANN and ANDREW I. SMITH, 

Derivatively on Behalf of FOXHOLLOW 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

TOMOAKI HINOHARA, RYAN D. DRANT, 

JEFFREY B. CHILD, JOHN B. SIMPSON, 

SANFORD FITCH, ROBERT W.THOMAS, 

RICHARD M. FERRAI AND MYRTLE S. 

POTTER

 Defendants,

and

FOXHOLLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

 Nominal Defendant.

Case No. C-06-4908 JW RS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION AND 

DEFENDANTS’ REPLY

Case 5:06-cv-04908-JW Document 25 Filed 07/26/07 Page 1 of 4
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLFS’ OPPOSITION AND DEFS’ REPLY 

Case No. C-06-4908 JW RS 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to a briefing schedule entered by the Court on 

November 8, 2006, providing that, among other things, Plaintiffs will file an amended complaint 

no later than January 5, 2007, Defendants shall file an Answer or other responsive pleading 

within 60 days of the filing of Plaintiffs’ amended complaint; if the Defendants file a motion to 

dismiss, Plaintiffs shall file its opposition thereto within 60 days of service of Defendants’ 

motion to dismiss; Defendants shall file any reply thereto within 30 days after the service of 

Plaintiffs’ opposition; and the Case Management Conference shall be continued until 30 days 

after the Court’s ruling on the motion to dismiss;

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on January 5, 2007;

WHEREAS Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on March 6, 2007;

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to a briefing schedule entered by the Court on May 7,

2007 providing that, among other things, Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition to Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss on or before June 11, 2007; Defendants shall file any reply thereto on or 

before July 11, 2007; Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be heard on September 10, 2007; and 

the Case Management Conference shall be postponed until thirty days after the Court’s ruling on 

the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss;

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to a briefing schedule entered by the Court on June 11, 

2007 providing that, among other things, Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition to Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss on or before July 25, 2007; Defendants’ will file their Reply to Plaintiffs’ 

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on or before August 24, 2007; Defendants’ Motion 

to Dismiss shall be heard on October 15, 2007 at 9:00am; and the Case Management Conference 

shall be postponed until thirty days after the Court’s ruling on the Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss;

WHEREAS, the parties in this action have met and conferred and agree that it is in their 

mutual interest to extend the time for the Plaintiffs’ to file their Opposition to Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss and to extend the time for Defendants to file their Reply to Plaintiffs’ 

Opposition;

Case 5:06-cv-04908-JW Document 25 Filed 07/26/07 Page 2 of 4
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLFS’ OPPOSITION AND DEFS’ REPLY 

Case No. C-06-4908 JW RS 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the proposed modifications to the briefing schedule will not prejudice any 

party, will not change the Court’s hearing date and will not cause undue delay; 

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED THAT:

1. Plaintiffs will file their Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss on or before 

September 4, 2007;

2. Defendants will file their Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion 

to Dismiss on or before October 1, 2007; 

3. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be heard on October 15, 2007 at 9:00am; 

and 

4. The Case Management Conference shall be postponed until 30 days after the 

Court’s ruling on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 

DATED: July 25, 2007 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

By /s/

 Paula L. Blizzard

 Attorneys for Defendants

DATED: July 25, 2007 GREEN WELLING LLP

By /s/

 Robert S. Green 

FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD

William B. Federman

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 5:06-cv-04908-JW Document 25 Filed 07/26/07 Page 3 of 4
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLFS’ OPPOSITION AND DEFS’ REPLY 

Case No. C-06-4908 JW RS 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GENERAL ORDER 45(X)

I, Robert S. Green, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45 (X)(B), I hereby attest 

that Paula L. Blizzard concurred in this filing. 

DATED: July 25, 2007 /s/

Robert S. Green

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July ______, 2007 ______________________________________

THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26

Case 5:06-cv-04908-JW Document 25 Filed 07/26/07 Page 4 of 4