Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01231/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01231-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Gary N. Lento #225118

BAKER, MANOCK & JENSEN

A Professional Corporation

5260 North Palm Avenue, Suite 421

Fresno, California 93704-2209

Telephone: (559) 432-5400

Facsimile: (559) 432-5620

Email: gnl@bmj-law.com

Attorneys for SMG, a Pennsylvania general partnership (incorrectly named as SMG Corporation,)

THERESA KRAUS (incorrectly named as TERESA KRAUS,) and MARIA PEHL

(incorrectly named as MARIA PHEL) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN SALVADORE GAMBOA; MARIA

“TERESA” HELE; RUBEN CARLOS

JIMENEZ; SHAWN M. PUTNAM; MICHAEL

BECKER; FRESNO VOICES FOR

ANIMALS,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF FRESNO; JERRY DYER,

individually and in his official capacity as the

Chief of Police for the City of Fresno;

REYNAUD WALLACE, individually and in

his official capacity as an employee of the

Fresno Police Department; SMG

CORPORATION; MARIA PHEL; TERESA

KRAUS; RICHARD NADEAU, individually

and in his official capacity as a Fresno City

Police Officer; DOES 1-50, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:06-CV-01231-AWI-LJO 

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE

ORDER 

WHEREAS, pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(b), Defendants, SMG, THERESA

KRAUS, and MARIA PEHL (collective referred to hereafter as “These Defendants”) are required

to produce “documents ... that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses ...”;

WHEREAS, These Defendants may produce documents in response to discovery

requests in this matter;

WHEREAS, some of the documents which must be disclosed under F.R.Civ.P.

Case 1:06-cv-01231-AWI -SMS Document 24 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

26(a)(1)(b), and produced during discovery, may be privileged, protected and/or proprietary; and

WHEREAS, the parties agree to limit the use of the documents to this matter only.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY

THE PARTIES AND ORDERED THAT:

1. This Stipulation and Order applies to all documents produced by These

Defendants, and all information derived therefrom.

2. The intent of this Stipulation and Order is that it shall be binding on the

parties hereto, all counsel for the parties hereto, as well as each of the Plaintiffs and

Defendants, all witnesses, and each person who has reviewed the documents

produced by These Defendants, and independently enforceable.

3. The parties hereto have agreed that the documents produced by These

Defendants, and all information derived therefrom, shall be used solely for use in

this matter, including any appeals. 

4. The parties hereto agree not to release or provide the documents produced

by These Defendants, or the information derived therefrom, to any person, business,

entity, organization, etc., unless necessary for the prosecution and/or defense of the

parties respective claims in this matter.

5. Disclosure of any of the documents produced by These Defendants, or any

parts thereof, or any information derived therefrom, other than in accordance with

the terms of this Protective Order may subject the disclosing person to such

sanctions and remedies as the Court may deem appropriate.

6. The terms of this Protective Order shall survive and remain in effect after

the termination of this matter. All persons shall take such measures as are necessary

and appropriate to prevent the public disclosure of any of the documents produced

by These Defendants, or any parts thereof, through inadvertence or otherwise, after

the conclusion of this matter.

7. After the termination of this matter, the documents produced by These

Defendants, shall be returned to These Defendants, by and through their attorneys,

Case 1:06-cv-01231-AWI -SMS Document 24 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Baker, Manock & Jensen, located at 5260 N. Palm Ave., #421, Fresno, California,

93704.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: ___1/17_______, 2007.

BAKER, MANOCK & JENSEN

By: __/s/ Gary N. Lento ______________________

Gary N. Lento

Attorneys for Defendants SMG, a Pennsylvania

general partnership (incorrectly named as SMG

Corporation,) THERESA KRAUS (incorrectly named

as TERESA KRAUS,) and MARIA PEHL

(incorrectly named as MARIA PHEL) 

Dated: __1/17__________, 2007.

ROBERT NAVARRO & CATHERINE

CAMPBELL

By__/s/ Robert Navarro______________________

Robert Navarro

Catherine Campbell

Attorney for Plaintiffs STEPHEN SALVADORE

GAMBOA; MARIA “TERESA” HELE; RUBEN

CARLOS JIMENEZ; SHAWN M. PUTNAM;

MICHAEL BECKER; FRESNO VOICES FOR

ANIMALS

Dated: __1/9__________, 2007.

ROBERT NAVARRO & CATHERINE

CAMPBELL

By__/s/ Catherine Campbell_________________

Robert Navarro

Catherine Campbell

Attorney for Plaintiffs STEPHEN SALVADORE

GAMBOA; MARIA “TERESA” HELE; RUBEN

CARLOS JIMENEZ; SHAWN M. PUTNAM;

MICHAEL BECKER; FRESNO VOICES FOR

ANIMALS

Dated: __Jan. 10__, 2007.

WEAKLEY, RATLIFF, ARENDT & McGUIRE,

Case 1:06-cv-01231-AWI -SMS Document 24 Filed 01/19/07 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

LLP

By__/s/ Rosemary T. McGuire_______________

Rosemary T. McGuire

Erica M. Camarena

Attorney for Defendants CITY OF FRESNO; JERRY

DYER; REYNAUD WALLACE; RICHARD

NADEAU; RICK DANA HARRELL 

Case 1:06-cv-01231-AWI -SMS Document 24 Filed 01/19/07 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

ORDER

For good cause appearing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This Protective Order applies to all documents produced by Defendants,

SMG, THERESA KRAUS, and/or MARIA PEHL (collectively referred to hereafter

as “These Defendants”), and all information derived therefrom.

2. This Protective Order shall be binding on the parties hereto, all counsel for

the parties hereto, as well as each of the Plaintiffs and Defendants, all witnesses,

and each person who has reviewed the documents produced by These Defendants,

and independently enforceable.

3. The documents produced by These Defendants, and all information derived

therefrom, shall be used solely for the prosecution and/or defense of the parties in

this matter, including any appeals. 

4. The documents produced by These Defendants, and the information derived

therefrom, shall not be disclosed to any person, business, entity, organization, etc.,

unless necessary for the prosecution and/or defense of the parties respective claims

in this matter.

5. Disclosure of any of the documents produced by These Defendants, or any

parts thereof, or information derived therefrom, other than in accordance with the

terms of this Protective Order may subject the disclosing person to such sanctions

and remedies as the Court may deem appropriate.

6. The terms of this Protective Order shall survive and remain in effect after

the termination of this matter. All persons shall take such measures as are necessary

and appropriate to prevent the public disclosure of any of the documents produced

by These Defendants, or any parts thereof, through inadvertence or otherwise, after

the conclusion of this matter.

///

///

///

Case 1:06-cv-01231-AWI -SMS Document 24 Filed 01/19/07 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

7. After the termination of this matter, the documents produced by These

Defendants, shall be returned to These Defendants, by and through their attorneys,

Baker, Manock & Jensen, located at 5260 North Palm Avenue, Suite 421, Fresno,

California, 93704.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 18, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01231-AWI -SMS Document 24 Filed 01/19/07 Page 6 of 6