Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01747/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01747-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID SAFIDI CAUTHEN, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

IGNACIO RIVERA, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:12cv01747 LJO DLB PC

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff David Safidi Cauthen, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action 

on October 26, 2012. 

On April 30, 2012, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations regarding dismissal 

of certain claims. The Court further found that Plaintiff stated the following claims: (1) 

excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Rivera, Negrete, 

Northcutt, Arreola, King and Waddle; (2) unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth and 

Eighth Amendments against Defendants Rivera, Negrete and Waddle; (3) deliberate indifference 

to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendant Mackey; and 

(4) violation of the First Amendment and RLUIPA against Defendants Rivera, Negrete and 

Waddle.

Case 1:12-cv-01747-DLB Document 15 Filed 06/03/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Also on April 30, 2013, the Court sent Plaintiff service documents for completion and 

return to the Court. Plaintiff returned the documents on May 28, 2013, and the documents will 

be forwarded to the United States Marshal for service.

On May 24, 2013, Plaintiff filed a document indicating that he was having difficulties 

accessing the law library and referencing the Court’s order to return service documents. Plaintiff 

has already returned the service documents and it does not appear that he requires additional time 

for that reason. To the extent that Plaintiff is requesting additional time to file objections to the 

Findings and Recommendations, his request is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file objections within 

twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2013 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

9b0hied

Case 1:12-cv-01747-DLB Document 15 Filed 06/03/13 Page 2 of 2