Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-271/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

SMRH:431304964.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INTERBOND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

A Limited Liability Partnership 

Including Professional Corporations 

GARY L. HALLING, Cal. Bar No. 66087 

JAMES L. McGINNIS, Cal. Bar No. 95788 

MICHAEL W. SCARBOROUGH, Cal. Bar No. 203524 

DYLAN I. BALLARD, Cal. Bar No. 253929 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4106 

Telephone: 415-434-9100 

Facsimile: 415-434-3947 

E-mail: ghalling@sheppardmullin.com 

 jmcginnis@sheppardmullin.com 

 mscarborough@sheppardmullin.com 

 dballard@sheppardmullin.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., 

SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD., 

SAMSUNG SDI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V., 

SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA., 

SHENZEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. and 

TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

 Case No. 07-5944 SC 

MDL No. 1917 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING INTERBOND 

DISCOVERY TO OCCUR AFTER 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2014 

This Document Relates to: 

INTERBOND ACTION 

Individual Case No. 3:11-cv-06275-SC 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2801 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 8
 -1-

SMRH:431304964.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INTERBOND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The undersigned Defendants (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff Interbond 

Corporation of America (“Interbond”) have conferred by and through their counsel and, subject to 

the Court’s approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

WHEREAS, September 5, 2014 is the deadline to complete fact discovery in the 

Interbond action; and 

WHEREAS, in the interest of conducting discovery in an efficient and streamlined 

manner and avoiding the taking of unnecessary depositions, the parties have agreed not to proceed 

at this time with depositions of Interbond employees who are uncertain or unlikely to be called by 

Interbond as a witness at trial; and

WHEREAS, Interbond reserves its rights to call such employees or any other 

individuals as trial witnesses; and 

WHEREAS, Interbond and Defendants have conferred and agreed that, to the 

extent Interbond identifies any individuals on its pretrial witness list whom have not been deposed 

in this litigation, Defendants may depose those individuals before trial; and

WHEREAS, Interbond and Defendants agree to negotiate and cooperate in good 

faith with respect to the scheduling and conduct of any depositions that may occur after September 

5, 2014 pursuant to this stipulation, consistent with the Court’s Discovery Protocol (Dkt. No. 

1128); and 

WHEREAS, Defendants and Interbond have conferred and agree that Interbond 

may make a production of documents after the September 5, 2014 close of fact discovery, but no 

later than September 12, 2014; and 

WHEREAS, Defendants will therefore be unable to review and evaluate those 

documents before the close of fact discovery; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between 

counsel for the undersigned parties as follows: 

1. To the extent Interbond identifies on its pretrial witness list any current or 

former employee, or any other person within its power to produce as a witness, who has not 

previously been deposed in this case, Defendants may notice and take the deposition of any such 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2801 Filed 09/05/14 Page 2 of 8
 -2-

SMRH:431304964.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INTERBOND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

individual before trial. However, Defendants may not seek to depose Interbond employee Lary 

Sinewitz in his individual capacity, who has previously appeared at deposition in this litigation 

pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

2. Interbond will complete its outstanding document production no later than 

September 12, 2014. To the extent Defendants wish to file a motion to compel with respect to that 

production, they will do so no later than September 19, 2014. 

The undersigned parties respectfully request that this stipulation be entered as an 

Order of the Court. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:___________________ ___________________________________ 

Hon. Samuel Conti 

United States District Judge

09/05/2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2801 Filed 09/05/14 Page 3 of 8
 -3- SMRH:431304964.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INTERBOND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: September 3, 2014 By: /s/ Dylan I. Ballard 

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON 

LLP

Gary L. Halling, Cal. Bar No. 66087 

James L. McGinnis, Cal. Bar No. 95788 

Michael W. Scarborough, Cal. Bar No. 203524 

Dylan I. Ballard, Cal. Bar No. 253929 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4109 

Telephone: (415) 434-9100 

Facsimile: (415) 434-3947 

E-mail: ghalling@sheppardmullin.com 

 jmcginnis@sheppardmullin.com 

 mscarborough@sheppardmullin.com 

 dballard@sheppardmullin.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Samsung SDI America, 

Inc.; Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.; Samsung SDI 

(Malaysia) SDN. BHD.; Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. 

DE C.V.; Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda.; Shenzen 

Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI 

Co., Ltd.

By: /s/ Philip J. Iovieno 

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

Philip J. Iovieno (pro hac vice)

Anne M. Nardacci (pro hac vice)

30 South Pearl Street, 11th Floor

Albany, NY 12207

Telephone: (518) 434-0600 

Facsimile: (518) 434-0665 

Email: piovieno@bsfllp.com 

anardacci@bsfllp.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Interbond Corporation of 

America

By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Kessler 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

Jeffrey L. Kessler (pro hac vice)

A. Paul Victor (pro hac vice)

Aldo A. Badini Cal. Bar No. 257086 

Eva W. Cole (pro hac vice)

Molly M. Donovan (pro hac vice)

200 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10166 

Telephone: (212) 294-4692 

Facsimile: (212) 294-4700 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2801 Filed 09/05/14 Page 4 of 8
 -4-

SMRH:431304964.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INTERBOND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Email: jkessler@winston.com 

 abadini@winston.com 

 pvictor@winston.com 

 ewcole@winston.com 

 mmdonovan@winston.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Steven A. Reiss (pro hac vice)

David L. Yohai (pro hac vice)

Adam C. Hemlock (pro hac vice)

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Telephone: (212) 310-8000 

Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 

Email: steven.reiss@weil.com 

 david.yohai@weil.com 

 adam.hemlock@weil.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Panasonic Corporation 

(f/k/a Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.), 

Panasonic Corporation of North America, and MT 

Picture Display Co., Ltd.

By: /s/ Jon V. Swenson 

BAKER BOTTS LLP 

Jon V. Swenson (SBN 233054) 

1001 Page Mill Road 

Building One, Suite 200 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 739-7500 

Facsimile: (650) 739-7699 

Email: jon.swenson@bakerbotts.com 

John M. Taladay (pro hac vice)

Joseph Ostoyich (pro hac vice)

Erik T. Koons (pro hac vice)

Charles M. Malaise (pro hac vice)

1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Washington, DC 20004-2400 

Telephone: (202) 639-7700 

Facsimile: (202) 639-7890 

Email: john.taladay@bakerbotts.com 

 joseph.ostoyich@bakerbotts.com 

 erik.koons@bakerbotts.com 

 charles.malaise@bakerbotts.com 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2801 Filed 09/05/14 Page 5 of 8
 -5- SMRH:431304964.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INTERBOND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Attorneys for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V. 

and Philips Electronics North America Corporation 

By: /s/ Richard Snyder 

FRESHFIELDS BRUCKHAUS 

 DERINGER US LLP 

Terry Calvani Cal. Bar. No. 53260 

Christine Laciak(pro hac vice)

Richard Snyder (pro hac vice)

701 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Telephone: (202) 777-4565 

Facsimile: (202) 777-4555 

Email: terry.calvani@freshfields.com 

 christine.laciak@freshfields.com 

 richard.snyder@freshfields.com 

Attorneys for Beijing-Matsushita Color CRT 

Company, Ltd. 

By: /s/ Eliot A. Adelson 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Eliot A. Adelson Cal. Bar. No. 205284 

555 California Street, 27th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 439-1413 

Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 

Email: eadelson@kirkland.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi 

Displays, Ltd. (n/k/a Japan Display East, Inc.), 

Hitachi Asia, Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd., and Hitachi 

Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

By: /s/ Lucius B. Lau 

WHITE & CASE LLP 

Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice)

George L. Paul (pro hac vice)

Lucius B. Lau (pro hac vice)

701 Thirteenth Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Telephone: (202) 626-3600 

Facsimile: (202) 639-9355 

Email: ccurran@whitecase.com 

 gpaul@whitecase.com 

 alau@whitecase.com 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2801 Filed 09/05/14 Page 6 of 8
 -6- SMRH:431304964.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INTERBOND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, 

Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information 

Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Consumer Products, 

L.L.C., and Toshiba America Electronic Components, 

Inc. 

By: /s/ Rachel S. Brass 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

Rachel S. Brass Cal. Bar. No. 219301 

Joel S. Sanders Cal. Bar. No. 107234 

Austin V. Schwing Cal. Bar. No. 211696 

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 393-8200 

Facsimile: (415) 393-8306 

Email: rbrass@gibsondunn.com 

 jsanders@gibsondunn.com 

 aschwing@gibsondunn.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Chunghwa Picture Tubes, 

Ltd. and Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) 

By: /s/ Hojoon Hwang 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

Hojoon Hwang, Cal. Bar. No. 184950 

William D. Temko, Cal. Bar. No. 98858 

Laura K. Lin, Cal. Bar. No. 281542 

560 Mission Street 

Twenty-Seventh Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105-2907 

Telephone: (415) 512-4000

Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 

Attorneys For Defendants LG Electronics, Inc. and 

LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. 

 By: /s/ Kathy L. Osborn 

 FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP 

 Kathy L. Osborn (pro hac vice)

 Ryan M. Hurley (pro hac vice)

 300 N. Meridian Street, Suite 2700 

 Indianapolis, IN 46204 

 Telephone: (317) 237-0300 

 Facsimile: (317) 237-1000 

 kathy.osborn@FaegreBD.com 

 ryan.hurley@FaegreBD.com 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2801 Filed 09/05/14 Page 7 of 8
 -7- SMRH:431304964.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INTERBOND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Calvin L. Litsey (SBN 289659) 

 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP 

 1950 University Avenue, Suite 450 

 East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2279 

 Telephone: (650) 324-6700 

 Facsimile: (650) 324-6701 

calvin.litsey@FaegreBD.com

 Attorneys for Defendants Thomson SA and 

 Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. 

 By: /s/ Michael T. Brody 

 JENNER&BLOCK LLP 

 Terrence J. Truax (pro hac vice)

 Michael T. Brody (pro hac vice)

 353 North Clark Street 

 Chicago, Illinois 60654-3456 

 Telephone: (312) 222-9350 

 Facsimile: (312) 527-0484 

 ttruax@jenner.com 

 mbrody@jenner.com 

 Brent Caslin (Cal. Bar. No. 198682) 

 JENNER&BLOCK LLP 

 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 3600 

 Los Angeles, California 90071 

 Telephone: (213) 239-5100 

 Facsimile: (213) 239-5199 

 bcaslin@jenner.com 

 Attorneys for Defendants Mitsubishi Electric 

 Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. 

 and, Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions 

 America, Inc. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2801 Filed 09/05/14 Page 8 of 8