Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03935/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03935-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

50334676v1 

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 

JULIA B. STRICKLAND (State Bar No. 083013) 

ANDREW W. MORITZ (State Bar No. 191889) 

A. R. KACHADOORIAN (State Bar No. 240601) 

2029 Century Park East, Suite 1800 

Los Angeles, California 90067-3086 

Telephone: 310-556-5800 

Facsimile: 310-556-5959 

lacalendar@stroock.com 

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant 

 CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MARYANN P. PACHECO, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA N.A., 

PATENAUDE & FELIX A.P.C. and WADE 

MILLER, an individual, 

Defendant. ______________________________________

CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., 

Cross-Complainant, 

 vs. 

MARYANN P. PACHECO; and DOES 1 

through 10, inclusive, 

Cross-Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 06-03935 MHP 

[Assigned to the Honorable Marilyn Hall 

Patel, Chief Judge] 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

Case 3:06-cv-03935-MHP Document 7 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 - 2 - 

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

50334676v1 

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 

2029 Century Park East, Suite 1800 

Los Angeles, California 90067-3086 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. 

(“Citibank”), and plaintiff Maryann P. Pacheco (“Plaintiff”), through their designated counsel, that 

the Complaint by Plaintiff in the above-captioned action shall be, and hereby is, dismissed with 

prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). This stipulation is effective as the other defendants in the 

action have not been served. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED, by and between Citibank and Plaintiff, 

through their designated counsel, that the Cross-Complaint filed by Citibank shall be, and hereby 

is, dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). 

Dated: September __, 2006 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 

 JULIA B. STRICKLAND 

ANDREW W. MORITZ 

A. R. KACHADOORIAN 

 By: s/Andrew W. Moritz 

 Andrew W. Moritz 

 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A. 

Dated: September __, 2006 THE BERG LAW GROUP 

 By: s/Irving L. Berg 

 Irving L. Berg 

 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 MARYANN P. PACHECO 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: __________________________________________ 

 MARILYN HALL PATEL 

 CHIEF JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES 

 DISTRICT COURT 

September 22, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-03935-MHP Document 7 Filed 09/22/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50296461v1 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

 ) ss 

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action. My business address is: 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1800, Los Angeles, California 90067-3086. 

On September 21, 2006, I served the foregoing document(s) described as STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL on the 

interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: 

Irving L. Berg, Esq. 

The Berg Law Group 

433 Town Center, PMB 493 

Corte Madera, CA 94925 

 (VIA PERSONAL SERVICE) By causing said documents listed above to be personally delivered to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth above. 

⌧ (VIA U.S. MAIL) In accordance with the regular mailing collection and processing practices of this office, with which I am readily familiar, by means of which mail is deposited with the United States Postal Service at 

Los Angeles, California that same day in the ordinary course of business, I deposited such sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, for collection and mailing on this same date following ordinary business practices, addressed as set forth below. 

 (VIA FACSIMILE) By causing such document to be delivered to the 

office of the addressee via facsimile. 

 (VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) By causing such envelope to be delivered to the office of the addressee(s) at the address(es) set forth above by overnight delivery via Federal Express or by a similar overnight delivery service. 

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court 

whose direction the service was made. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that 

the above is true and correct. 

Executed on September 21, 2006, at Los Angeles, California. 

Lore Pekrul s/Lore Pekrul 

[Type or Print Name] [Signature] 

Case 3:06-cv-03935-MHP Document 7 Filed 09/22/06 Page 3 of 3