Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01523/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01523-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Juan L. Aguila is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 22, 2014, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint and ordered Plaintiff to 

either file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on the claim 

found to be cognizable, within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff was 

warned that if he failed to comply, this action would be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to 

obey a court order. On January 5, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address, and the Findings 

and Recommendations was re-served on Plaintiff on February 3, 2015. (ECF No. 6.) More than thirty 

days have passed, and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the order. As a result, 

there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED, with 

prejudice, for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which may be granted. 

JUAN L. AGUILA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

WOODWARD, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01523-AWI-SAB (PC)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE 

CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE 

GRANTED

[ECF No. 5]

Case 1:14-cv-01523-AWI-SAB Document 8 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This Findings and Recommendation will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days 

after being served with this Findings and Recommendation, Plaintiff may file written objections with 

the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 

Recommendation.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may 

result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)

(citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01523-AWI-SAB Document 8 Filed 03/19/15 Page 2 of 2