Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05077/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05077-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05077 WHO 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DIANA RUTOWSKI (CA Bar No. 233878)

drutowski@orrick.com 

GEORGE KANABE (CA Bar No. 284779) 

gkanabe@orrick.com 

ANDREW S. ONG (CA Bar No. 267889) 

aong@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 614-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 

SHOPKICK, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

NOVITAZ, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SHOPKICK, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:14-cv-05077 WHO

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 

6-1(B) AND ORDER TO 

MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE 

Case 3:14-cv-05077-WHO Document 150 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 3
- 2 - 

 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05077 WHO 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff Novitaz, Inc. and Defendant shopkick, Inc., by 

and through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to the following proposed 

modifications to the current Case Schedule (see Dkt. No. 145): 

Event Current Date Modified Date 

Patent L.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction 

and Prehearing Statement 

September 24, 2015 [unchanged]

Patent L.R. 4-4 Close of Claim 

Construction Discovery 

[other than claim construction 

depositions listed below] 

October 8, 2015 [unchanged]

Patent L.R. 4-5(a) Opening Claim 

Construction Brief 

October 29, 2015 [unchanged]

Deadline for shopkick to conduct claim 

construction deposition of Jayant 

Ramchandani 

[none] November 12, 2015

Patent L.R. 4-5(b) Responsive Claim 

Construction Brief 

December 7, 2015 [unchanged]

Deadline for Novitaz to conduct claim 

construction depositions of Walter 

Overby and Marc Prioleau 

[none] December 14, 2015

Patent L.R. 4-5(c) Reply Claim 

Construction Brief 

December 21, 2015 [unchanged]

Claim Construction Tutorial January 22, 2016 at 10 

a.m. in Courtroom 12

[unchanged]

Claim Construction Hearing January 29, 2016 at 10 

a.m. in Courtroom 12

[unchanged]

Fact discovery cut-off 90 days after issuance of 

claim construction ruling 

[unchanged]

Initial expert disclosures/reports (on issue 

where the party bears the burden of 

proof) 

120 days after issuance 

of claim construction 

ruling

[unchanged]

Rebuttal expert reports 165 days after issuance 

of claim construction 

ruling

[unchanged]

Close of expert discovery 195 days after issuance 

of claim construction 

ruling

[unchanged]

Deadline for dispositive motions 225 days after issuance 

of claim construction 

ruling

[unchanged]

Hearing on dispositive motions Subject to the Court’s 

convenience, ten months 

after issuance of claim 

construction ruling

[unchanged]

Final pretrial conference Subject to the Court’s 

convenience, twelve 

months after issuance of 

claim construction ruling 

[unchanged]

Trial Subject to the Court’s 

convenience, thirteen 

[unchanged]

Case 3:14-cv-05077-WHO Document 150 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 3
- 3 - 

 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05077 WHO 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Event Current Date Modified Date 

months after issuance of 

claim construction ruling 

The proposed modifications merely extend the Patent Local Rule 4-4 claim construction 

discovery deadline with respect to three claim construction depositions. 

This modification of the schedule will not alter any other dates currently set by the Court’s 

case scheduling order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: September 24, 2015 GRAY ROBINSON, P.A. 

GATTEY LAW OFFICE 

By: /s/ Woodrow H. Pollack 

WOODROW H. POLLACK 

Attorney for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 

NOVITAZ, INC.

Dated: September 24, 2015 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

By: /s/ Diana Rutowski 

DIANA RUTOWSKI 

Attorney for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

SHOPKICK, INC.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September __, 2015 

Honorable William H. Orrick 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:14-cv-05077-WHO Document 150 Filed 09/28/15 Page 3 of 3