Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02877/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02877-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAVON JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

E. SWARTZ, et al,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-2877 WBS KJN P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed March 10, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 

to file an amended complaint was granted. By order filed April 21, 2015, plaintiff was granted an 

additional thirty days leave to file an amended complaint, and also cautioned that no further 

extensions of time would be granted absent a showing of good cause. More than thirty days from 

that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise 

responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

Case 2:14-cv-02877-WBS-KJN Document 20 Filed 06/22/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: June 22, 2015

/ jone2877.fta

Case 2:14-cv-02877-WBS-KJN Document 20 Filed 06/22/15 Page 2 of 2