Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01585/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01585-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

A. WHITTEN, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-1585 MCE CKD P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 25, 2016, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein 

(ECF No. 12) which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to 

the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff timely filed 

objections to the Findings and Recommendations. ECF No. 13.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, the 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

including Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

Case 2:15-cv-01585-MCE-CKD Document 17 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 25, 2016 (ECF No. 12) are 

ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. All Defendants and claims, except the First Amendment retaliation claims against 

Defendants Whitten, Dooley, and Mendosa, are DISMISSED from this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 17, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-01585-MCE-CKD Document 17 Filed 02/17/16 Page 2 of 2