Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-md-02430/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-md-02430-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

Case No. 13-MD-02430-LHK

RELATED CASE ORDER (CORLEY)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE GOOGLE INC. GMAIL 

LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO

Corley v. Google, Inc.,

No. 16-CV-00473-NC

Case No. 13-MD-02430-LHK

RELATED CASE ORDER 

(CORLEY)

On February 1, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins of the Northern 

District of California referred Corley v. Google, Inc., No. 16-CV-00473-NC (“Corley”) to the 

undersigned judge for a determination on whether Corley should be related to In re Google Inc. 

Gmail Litigation, No. 13-MD-02430-LHK (“In re Google”). See ECF No. 193 in the In re Google

docket. Corley and In re Google concern substantially the same parties and events, and it appears 

likely that there will be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting 

results if the cases are conducted before different judges. See Civil L.R. 3-12(a). Accordingly, the 

Court determines that Corley should be related to In re Google. 

Corley shall be reassigned to the undersigned judge. All future filings are to bear the 

initials “LHK.” Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and 

Case 5:13-md-02430-LHK Document 194 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 13-MD-02430-LHK

RELATED CASE ORDER (CORLEY)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the 

ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order 

continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly 

assigned judge. A copy of this Order shall be filed in the Corley docket. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2016

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:13-md-02430-LHK Document 194 Filed 02/11/16 Page 2 of 2