Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03607/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03607-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

15-cv-03607-RMW

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HECTOR LEONEL PICART,

Plaintiff,

v.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-03607-RMW 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Re: Dkt. No. 18, 31 

Plaintiff filed this case on August 6, 2015. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss 

on October 27, 2015. Dkt. No. 18. Plaintiff did not file a written opposition to the motion to 

dismiss. Plaintiff did not appear at the initial case management conference on January 15, 2016. 

Dkt. No. 30. On January 20, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why the case should 

not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 31. Plaintiff did not file a written response to 

the order to show cause. Defendants’ motion to dismiss and the order to show cause were set for 

hearing on January 29, 2016. Dkt. Nos. Plaintiff did not appear. The court dismisses the case for 

failure to diligently prosecute. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is also granted as unopposed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 5, 2016

______________________________________

Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-03607-RMW Document 35 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 1