Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01338/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01338-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BOBBY DARRELL JOHNSON, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SHASTA COUNTY, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-1338-KJM-EFB 

ORDER 

 On June 17, 2015, this case was before the court for hearing on plaintiffs’ motions to 

compel non-party Mary Todd’s compliance with a subpoena duces tecum. ECF No. 35. The 

subpoena at issue requested Ms. Todd to produce an attachment to a search warrant that had been 

ordered sealed by the Sutter County Superior Court. See ECF No. 42 at 3 (Joint Statement on 

Mot. to Compel). After the hearing, the court reserved ruling on the motion until after the parties 

had attempted to resolve the dispute before the California Superior Court. 

 It appears from the record in this case that the parties were able to successfully resolve 

their dispute before the California Superior Court. On October 23, 2015, plaintiffs filed a motion 

for partial summary judgment. ECF No. 66. The motion indicates that plaintiffs have since 

obtained the attachment to the search warrant that was sought by the subpoena duces tecum. Id.

at 14 n.2. 

///// 

Case 2:14-cv-01338-KJM-EFB Document 104 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Accordingly, the motion to compel non-party Mary Todd’s compliance with a subpoena 

duces tecum (ECF No. 35) is moot and therefore denied. 

 So Ordered. 

DATED: November 23, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-01338-KJM-EFB Document 104 Filed 11/24/15 Page 2 of 2