Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03705/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03705-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME FOR ADR COMPLIANCE AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case # C-05-3705 MHP 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

SHELDON R. MEYER (SBN 063491) (Email: srm@fdml.com) 

THOMAS A WARD (SBN 160659) (Email: taw@fdml.com) 

MICHAEL L. ROBBINS (SBN 224087) (Email: mrobbins@fdml.com) 

FLIESLER MEYER LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, Fourth Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 362-3800 

Facsimile (415) 362-2928 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Unuson Corporation 

STEPHEN N. HOLLMAN (SBN 055219) (Email: shollman@bestintechnologylaw.com)

Business & Technology Law Group 

160 W. Santa Clara Street, Suite 1050 

San Jose, California 95113 

Telephone: (408) 282-1949 

Facsimile: (408) 275-9930 

Attorneys for Defendant Built Entertainment Group, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

UNUSON CORPORATION, a California 

Corporation; 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

BUILT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., a 

California Corporation; and DOES 1-10, 

 Defendants. 

Civil Action No.: 05-3705 MHP 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO 

ENLARGE TIME FOR ADR 

COMPLIANCE AND TO CONTINUE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Plaintiff, Unuson Corporation (“Unuson”), and Defendant, Built Entertainment Group (“Built”), 

acting pursuant to the Court’s Civil Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2(e), stipulate (i) that the time for 

satisfaction of the ADR requirement in this case is about to extend beyond the ninety (90) day 

requirement set forth in ADR Local Rule 6-4(b) following the February 17, 2006 referral by the Court of 

this case to mediation administered by JAMS (the “Mediation”), and that the time for satisfaction of the 

ADR requirement in this case should be enlarged to and through August 30, 2006; and (ii) to 

Case 3:05-cv-03705-MHP Document 40 Filed 06/21/06 Page 1 of 3
________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME FOR ADR COMPLIANCE AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case # C-05-3705 MHP 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

continue the date of the Case Management Conference now calendared for June 26, 2006 at 3:00 p.m. to 

Monday, September 11, 2006 at 3:00 p.m. Accordingly, the parties would submit a Case Management 

Conference Statement on or before September 1, 2006. 

FACTS 

The first session of the Mediation was held on March 17, 2006 in San Francisco, and the second 

session of the Mediation was held on April 24, 2006 in San Jose. The Mediation is ongoing and may not 

be completed within the ninety period prescribed by ADR Local Rule 6-4(b). The parties are continuing 

their communications, and the JAMS mediator, Hon. Lourdes G. Baird (Ret.), has consented to 

continuing her attempts to facilitate a resolution of this case. 

The parties believe that an enlargement of time for satisfaction of the ADR requirement in this 

case to and through August 30, 2006 will permit the parties and the mediator to continue in their efforts 

to reach a settlement of their claims, or, in the alternative, to prepare for and appear at a re-calendared 

Case Management Conference. 

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, Unuson and Built request that the Court issue an order enlarging the date

for ADR compliance in this case to and include August 30, 2006 continuing the date of the Case 

Management Conference now calendared for June 26, 2006 to September 11, 2006. 

Respectfully submitted, this 19 day of June, 2006. 

digitally signed/Sheldon R. Meyer digitally signed/Stephen N. Hollman

Sheldon R. Meyer, Esq. Stephen N. Hollman, Esq. 

Fliesler Meyer LLP Business & Technology Law Group 

Four Embarcadero Center, 4th Floor 160 W. Santa Clara Street, Ste. 1050 

San Francisco, California 94111 San Jose, California 95113 

(415) 362-3800 (408) 282-1949 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 

Unuson Corporation Built Entertainment Group, Inc. 

Case 3:05-cv-03705-MHP Document 40 Filed 06/21/06 Page 2 of 3
________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME FOR ADR COMPLIANCE AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case # C-05-3705 MHP 

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

 After consideration of the foregoing Stipulation, the reasons therefor, and all other matters 

presented to this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (i) the time for satisfaction of the ADR 

requirement in this case be extended to and through August 31, 2006; and (ii) the Case Management 

Conference, which is now calendared for Monday, June 26, 2006 at 3:00 p.m., be continued to Monday, 

September 11, 2006, at 3:00 p.m. 

Dated: June __, 2006 

 _____________________________________

 HONORABLE MARILYN HALL PATEL 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

20

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:05-cv-03705-MHP Document 40 Filed 06/21/06 Page 3 of 3