Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-02324/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-02324-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAMMES COMPANY

HEALTHCARE, LLC, a Wisconsin

limited liability company, and HC TRICITY I, LLC, a Wisconsin limited

liability company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TRI-CITY HEALTHCARE

DISTRICT, a California public entity,

et al.

Defendants,

 

 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:09-cv-2324-GPC-KSC

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF

AMENDED JUDGMENT

All claims against all parties in this case have been finally resolved, as set forth

in the following orders:

1. January 28, 2010 Amended Order: Granting in Part and Denying in Part

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 14);

2. July 11, 2011 Order: Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’

Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 85);

3. December 13, 2011 Order, (ECF No. 110);

4. December 21, 2012 Order: Dismissing Claims for Declaratory Relief,

(ECF No. 147); and

3:09-cv-2324-GPC-KSC

Case 3:09-cv-02324-GPC-KSC Document 202 Filed 01/10/14 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5. January 8, 2014 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Following

Bench Trial, (ECF No. 200).

Accordingly, the Court directs the Clerk of Court to amend the final judgment

entered on January 8, 2014, to finally dispose of all claims and parties to this action as

follows:

1. Final judgment shall be entered in favor of defendant Tri-City Healthcare

District (“District”) and against plaintiff Hammes Company Healthcare,

LLC (“Hammes”) on Hammes’ claim for breach of contract (Letter of

Intent);

2. Final judgment shall be entered in favor of defendant District and against

plaintiffs Hammes and HC Tri-City I, LLC (“HC”) on Hammes’ and HC’s

claim for breach of contracts (Ground Lease and Space Lease);

3. Final judgment shall be entered in favor of defendants District, Pamela

Smith (“Smith”), and Larry Anderson (“Anderson”), and against plaintiffs

Hammes and HC, on Hammes’ and HC’s claim for breach of the implied

covenant of good faith and fair dealing;

4. Final judgment shall be entered in favor of defendants Smith and

Anderson, and against plaintiffs Hammes and HC, on Hammes’ and HC’s

claim for fraud;

5. Final judgment shall be entered in favor of defendants District, Anderson,

and Smith, and against plaintiffs Hammes and HC, on Hammes’ and HC’s

claim for interference with contract and/or economic advantage;

6. Final judgment shall be entered in favor of defendants District, Anderson,

and Smith, and against plaintiffs Hammes and HC, on Hammes’ and HC’s

claim for promissory estoppel; and

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

2 3:09-cv-2324-GPC-KSC

Case 3:09-cv-02324-GPC-KSC Document 202 Filed 01/10/14 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7. Final judgment shall be entered in favor of defendants District, Anderson,

and Smith, and against plaintiffs Hammes and HC, on Hammes’ and HC’s

claim for declaratory relief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 10, 2014

HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL

United States District Judge

3 3:09-cv-2324-GPC-KSC

Case 3:09-cv-02324-GPC-KSC Document 202 Filed 01/10/14 Page 3 of 3