Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00856/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00856-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHS West:260428365.2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

CASE NO. C-08-00856-MMC 

ROBERT P. VARIAN (STATE BAR NO. 107459)

MICHAEL D. TORPEY (STATE BAR NO. 79424) 

AMY M. ROSS (STATE BAR NO. 215692) 

BENJAMIN C. GEIGER (STATE BAR NO. 245614 ) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

The Orrick Building 

405 Howard Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 

Telephone: 1-415-773-5700 

Facsimile: 1-415-773-5759 

Attorneys for Defendants SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., 

Michael L. Canning, Diosdado P. Banatao, Geoffrey Ribar and 

Kanwar Chadha 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re SiRF TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, 

INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Related To: All Actions 

No. C-08-00856-MMC 

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 

RULE 7-11 

Case 3:08-cv-00856-MMC Document 77 Filed 05/02/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHS West:260428365.2 - 1 - [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF CASE NO. C08-00856-MMC 

Defendants SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., Michael L. Canning, Diosdado P. Banatao, 

Geoffrey Ribar and Kanwar Chadha (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys, Orrick, 

Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, moved for administrative relief pursuant to Local Rule 7-11 on April 

25, 2008. 

After considering the papers submitted by the parties, and finding good cause, the Court 

hereby orders that Defendants’ motion for administrative relief is granted. Specifically, the Court 

continues the following deadlines until after the appointment of a lead plaintiff and lead 

plaintiff’s counsel: (1) April 25, 2008, by which the parties were required to meet and confer 

regarding initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and a discovery plan, as 

well as file a Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation on ADR Process or Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference; (2) May 9, 2008, by which the parties were required to file their Rule 

26(f) Reports, complete initial disclosures or objections to disclosure, and case management 

conference statements; and (3) the Initial Case Management Conference set for May 16, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April ____, 2008 _________________________________________

The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

No opposition has been filed.

Defendants

vacates such deadlines to be reset

,

2

May

Case 3:08-cv-00856-MMC Document 77 Filed 05/02/08 Page 2 of 2