Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01201/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01201-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. He has not filed an application requesting leave to

proceed in forma pauperis to have service effected by the U.S. Marshall pursuant to Rule 4(c)(2).

2

 In the same order, the court also stated that the parties’ status reports would be due

within 120 days. Because of the confusion concerning the deadline, the court will vacate the

dates for the filing of status reports.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY A. PATE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1201 FCD DAD P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFFS DEPUTIES,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 On August 15, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff to serve process on defendant

Garcia within sixty days from the date of the order. The court also ordered plaintiff to file his

status report within ninety days from the date of the order.2 Plaintiff has not filed a notice

indicating that service has been executed on defendant Garcia. Therefore, the court will order

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01201-FCD-DAD Document 22 Filed 11/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

plaintiff to submit proof of service pursuant to Rule 4(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

or show cause why service has not been completed. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Within fifteen days from the service of this order, plaintiff shall file his proof

of service on defendant Garcia, or show cause why service has not been completed;

2. The dates for the filing of status report, set forth in the court’s August 15, 2005

order, are vacated; and

3. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this

action. 

DATED: November 14, 2005.

DAD:4

pate1201.osc

Case 2:04-cv-01201-FCD-DAD Document 22 Filed 11/15/05 Page 2 of 2