Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01393/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01393-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AT T ORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRA NCI SCO

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING

CASE NO. 16-cv-01393-JST

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Christopher S. Yates (SBN 161273)

Christopher B. Campbell (SBN 254776)

Meaghan P. Thomas-Kennedy (SBN 303578)

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, California 94111-6538

Telephone: 415.391.0600

Facsimile: 415.395.8095

Email: chris.yates@lw.com

christopher.campbell@lw.com

meaghan.thomas-kennedy@lw.com

ORACLE CORPORATION

Dorian Daley (SBN 129049)

Deborah K. Miller (SBN 95527)

500 Oracle Parkway

M/S 5op7

Redwood City, CA 94065

Telephone: 650.506.4846

Facsimile: 650.506.7114

Email dorian.daley@oracle.com

deborah.miller@oracle.com

ORACLE CORPORATION

Jeffrey S. Ross (SBN 138172)

10 Van de Graaff Drive

Burlington, MA 01803

Telephone: 781.744.0449

Facsimile: 781.238.6273

Email: jeff.ross@oracle.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Oracle America, Inc., and Oracle 

International Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; ORACLE INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, a California corporation

Plaintiffs,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and DOES

1–50,

Defendants.

No. 16-cv-01393-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

CASE SCHEDULING

Case 4:16-cv-01393-JST Document 40 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AT T ORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRA NCI SCO 1

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING 

CASE NO. 16-cv-01393-JST

WHEREAS, the Court has not yet set a date for the initial case management conference 

in the above-captioned action; 

WHEREAS, on April 29, 2016, Defendant Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Co. (“HPE”) filed 

a Motion To Dismiss, Dkt. No. 34 (“Motion to Dismiss”), and noticed the Motion to Dismiss for 

hearing on June 30, 2016; 

WHEREAS, on May 2, 2016, HPE filed an Administrative Motion to Schedule Case 

Management Conference, Dkt. No. 37 (“Administrative Motion”); 

WHEREAS, HPE and Plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle International 

Corporation (collectively, “Oracle”) have further met and conferred regarding HPE’s 

Administrative Motion, a date for the parties’ conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 26(f), and the hearing date for HPE’s Motion to Dismiss; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, and ask the Court to order, as follows: 

1. HPE’s Administrative Motion, Dkt. No. 37, is hereby withdrawn, without 

prejudice to HPE refiling the Administrative Motion if this stipulation is not 

accepted by the Court. 

2. The parties shall hold their Rule 26(f) conference on May 31, 2016, at a time to be 

agreed upon between the parties.

3. The deadline for Oracle’s opposition to HPE’s Motion to Dismiss shall be 

extended to May 24, 2016. The deadline for HPE’s reply in support of its Motion 

to Dismiss shall be extended to June 10, 2016.

4. HPE’s Motion To Dismiss shall be reset for hearing on July 14, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

5. The initial case management conference shall be set either for July 14, 2016 (to 

occur after the hearing on HPE’s Motion to Dismiss) or, if the Court is not 

available to conduct the two proceedings on that date, for the first available case 

management conference date after June 17, 2016.

Case 4:16-cv-01393-JST Document 40 Filed 05/06/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AT T ORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRA NCI SCO 2

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING 

CASE NO. 16-cv-01393-JST

Dated: May 5, 2016 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

By: /s/ Christopher S. Yates

Christopher S. Yates

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Oracle America, Inc. and 

Oracle International Corporation

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By: /s/ Blaine H. Evanson

Blaine H. Evanson

Attorneys for Defendant

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________________________

Hon. Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge

May 6, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 4:16-cv-01393-JST Document 40 Filed 05/06/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AT T ORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRA NCI SCO 3

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING 

CASE NO. 16-cv-01393-JST

ATTESTATION

I, Christopher S. Yates, am counsel for Plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc. and 

Oracle International Corporation. I am the registered ECF user whose username and password 

are being used to file this stipulation and proposed order. In compliance with Local Rule 

5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the above-identified counsel concurred in this filing.

Dated: May 5, 2016 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

By: /s/ Christopher S. Yates

Christopher S. Yates

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Oracle America, Inc. and 

Oracle International Corporation

Case 4:16-cv-01393-JST Document 40 Filed 05/06/16 Page 4 of 4