Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01265/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01265-44/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TERRYLYN MCCAIN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MANGHAM, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:11-cv-1265 KJM AC (PS) 

ORDER 

 Defendants Mike’s Towing Service, Inc. and Michael D. Olivarez, have filed an ex parte 

application for an order clarifying the briefing schedule set forth at ECF Nos. 296 (schedule), 305 

(granting defendants’ requested extension). ECF No. 307. 

 The application (ECF No. 307), is hereby GRANTED as follows: 

1. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 265) has been supplemented and/or 

supported by documents filed at ECF Nos. 267, 272, 2861

 and 302. Plaintiff shall file no 

further documents in support of her motion until defendants have opposed the motion and 

it is plaintiff’s turn to reply. 

 

1

 It is unclear whether ECF No. 286, plaintiff’s “Correction(s) of Deem Facts,” is intended to 

support her own motion for summary judgment or her opposition to either or both of defendant’s 

motions. The court will consider this document, to the extent if any that it is applicable, in both 

contexts. 

Case 2:11-cv-01265-KJM-AC Document 310 Filed 12/22/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

2. Defendants’ opposition briefs and any supporting documents are due on January 12, 2017. 

Defendants shall address plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as supplemented 

and/or supported by ECF Nos. 267, 272, 286 and 302. 

3. Plaintiff may reply to defendants’ oppositions no later than March 10, 2017. Materials 

submitted after March 10, 2017 will not be considered. 

4. Plaintiff has opposed the Tow defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 250, 

259) at ECF Nos. 269 and 294. Plaintiff has opposed the CHP defendants’ motion for 

summary judgment (ECF Nos. 262, 264) at ECF Nos. 300 and 302. Plaintiff shall file no 

further documents in opposition to these motions without leave of court, which will be 

granted only for good cause. 

5. Defendants’ reply brief in support of their motions are due on March 10, 2017. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: December 22, 2016 

Case 2:11-cv-01265-KJM-AC Document 310 Filed 12/22/16 Page 2 of 2