Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02460/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02460-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT L CAZET, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

TOPPA EPPS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 10-02460 JSW

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

AND HEARING SCHEDULE RE

APPLICATION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER

On June 8, 2010, Plaintiffs Robert L. Cazet, Alumni Athletics USA, LLC and Alumni

Athletics, USA Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) filed an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order

against Defendants Toppa Epps, Cameron Ripley, and Edward Hayman (“Defendants”). 

Plaintiffs seek a temporary restraining order enjoining Defendants from using the name Alumni

Athletics USA or any confusingly similar names as either a trade name or as a domain name,

including but not limited to “Alumni Athletics,” “Alumni Athletics Association,” “Alumni

Football” and “Alumni Football USA” in whole or part and from using any videos and pictures

on their website and/or promotional materials, which depict games which were organized or

sponsored by any of the Plaintiffs or having hyperlinks to any such videos or pictures. 

The Court will conduct a hearing on Plaintiffs’ application at 9:00 a.m. on June 11,

2010. Plaintiffs filed a proof of service indicating that they served a copy of the ex parte

application and supporting papers on Defendants. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that

Plaintiffs shall serve on Defendants a copy of the complaint in the above captioned matter and a 

Case 3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document 12 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

copy of this order by no later than 1:30 p.m. today, June 9, 2010, with proof of such service to

be filed by 4:00 p.m. For purposes of hearing this application on an expedited basis, Plaintiffs

may serve Defendants by facsimile or e-mail. However, this does not excuse Plaintiffs from

properly serving the summons and complaint.

Defendants shall file their response to this application by no later than 9:00 a.m.

tomorrow, June 10, 2010, with chambers copies delivered directly chambers by no later than

10:00 a.m. on June 10, 2010. Plaintiffs may file a response by no later than 2:00 p.m. on June

10, 2010, with chambers copies delivered directly chambers by no later than 2:30 p.m. on June

10, 2010. 

The parties should be prepared at the hearing to address whether they consent to have

this case heard by a magistrate judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document 12 Filed 06/09/10 Page 2 of 2