Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02544/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02544-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT J. SOLOMON,

Plaintiff, No. 2:08-cv-2544 JFM P

vs.

LIEUTENANT SCHIRMER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding before a United States Magistrate Judge with the

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See Order filed February 3, 20120.

On November 3, 2012, defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. 

Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written

opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to

the granting of the motion . . . .” On August 6, 2010 and January 21, 2011, plaintiff was advised

of the requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a

motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. 

/////

1

Case 2:08-cv-02544-KJN Document 104 Filed 12/07/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.” In the orders filed August 6, 2010 and January 21, 2011, plaintiff

was advised that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in the dismissal of this action.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the

date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a

statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation

to dismiss this action pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: December 6, 2012.

12

solo2544.46osc

2

Case 2:08-cv-02544-KJN Document 104 Filed 12/07/12 Page 2 of 2