Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04982/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04982-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

David M. Zeff (S.B. #63289) 

E-mail: Zefflaw1@aol.com 

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. ZEFF 

1388 Sutter Street, Ste. 820 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

Telephone: (415) 923-1380 

Facsimile: (415) 923-1382 

Donald B. Haslett, pro hac vice 

E-mail: don@chernofflaw.com 

Susan D. Pitchford, pro hac vice 

E-mail: sdp@chernofflaw.com 

CHERNOFF, VILHAUER, McCLUNG & STENZEL, LLP 

1600 ODS Tower 

601 S.W. Second Avenue 

Portland, Oregon 97204-3157 

Telephone: (503) 227-5631 

Facsimile: (503) 228-4373 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SLOCUM ENTERPRISES, INC. and 

D. BARCLAY SLOCUM TRUST 

AGREEMENT, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

NEW GENERATION DEVICES, INC., 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. 05-04982 MHP 

ORDER MODIFYING 

PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED ORDER

(NINETY-DAY CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL)

 This matter came before the court on November 6, 2006. Plaintiffs were 

represented by Susan D. Pitchford of Chernoff, Vilhauer, McClung & Stenzel LLP. 

Defendant was represented by Adam Thurston of Eisenberg Raizman Thurston & Wong 

LLP. The court having considered this matter in good cause appearing, 

PAGE 1 –ORDER MODIFYING PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ORDER 

 (NINETY-DAY CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL) 

28

Case 3:05-cv-04982-MHP Document 51 Filed 12/01/06 Page 1 of 3
 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order issued by this Court on May 22, 2006 

entitled Order (Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal) is modyfied to read as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without

prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify 

to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on opposing 

counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed 

consideration for the settlement has not been delivered over, this 

Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be restored to the 

calendar to be set for trial. 

As more than 90 days have passed since May 22, 2006, this matter is dismissed 

without prejudice. 

Dated this __ day of November, 2006. 

 _______________________________ 

 Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

 United States District/Magistrate Judge 

PAGE 2 –ORDER MODIFYING PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ORDER 

 (NINETY-DAY CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL) 

28

24th

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

U

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:05-cv-04982-MHP Document 51 Filed 12/01/06 Page 2 of 3
 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I caused a true copy of the foregoing ORDER MODIFYING 

PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ORDER (NINETY-DAY CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL) to 

be served upon counsel for the Plaintiffs from the proceeding below via U.S. Mail delivery 

and email as follows: 

Adam J. Thurston 

EISENBERG RAIZMAN THURSTON & WONG LLP 

11601 Wilshire Blvd., Fifth Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90025 

Telephone: (310) 235-1450 

Facsimile: (310) 235.1490 

E-mail: athurston@ertwllp.com 

Michael R. Friscia 

McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP 

Four Gateway Center 

100 Mulberry Street 

Newark, New Jersey 07102 

Telephone: (973) 622-4444 

Facsimile: (973) 624-7070 

E-mail: mfriscia@McCarter.com 

I declare under penalty of the laws of the State of Oregon that the foregoing is true 

and correct to the best of my knowledge and ability. 

Date: November 14, 2006 

 /s/ Susan D. Pitchford 

Susan D. Pitchford, OSB No. 98091 

Telephone: (503) 227-5631 

Of Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Slocum Enterprises, Inc. and D. 

Barclay Slocum Trust Agreement 

 

PAGE 3 –ORDER MODIFYING PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ORDER 

 (NINETY-DAY CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL) 

28

Case 3:05-cv-04982-MHP Document 51 Filed 12/01/06 Page 3 of 3