Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04894/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04894-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 462
Nature of Suit: Naturalization, Petition For Hearing of Denial
Cause of Action: Application for Naturalization

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TANYER VAKILI,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-04894-KAW 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

TO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY 

FILING FEE; ORDER REASSIGNING 

CASE

Re: Dkt. No. 1

Plaintiff commenced the above-captioned case on October 23, 2015. (Compl., Dkt. No. 1.) 

He also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (IFP App., Dkt. No. 2.) The Court 

denied the application with leave to amend and ordered Plaintiff to (a) file an application that was 

completed in full or (b) pay the filing fee by no later than December 16, 2015. (Nov. 13, 2015, 

Dkt. No. 4.) As of the filing of this report and recommendation, Plaintiff has not paid the filing 

fee or filed a completed application. Nor has Plaintiff responded to the Clerk's 

Consent/Declination Notices. (Clerk's Notices, Dkt. Nos. 5, 6.) Accordingly, the undersigned 

now recommends that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the 

filing fee. Furthermore, because Plaintiff has not consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, this 

case shall be REASSIGNED to a district judge.

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:15-cv-04894-CRB Document 7 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Any party may file objections to this report and recommendation with the district judge 

within fourteen days after being served with a copy. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 

Civil L.R. 72-3. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal 

the District Court's order. IBEW Local 595 Trust Funds v. ACS Controls Corp., No. C-10-5568 

EDL, 2011 WL 1496056, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011).

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

Dated: 02/26/16

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-04894-CRB Document 7 Filed 02/26/16 Page 2 of 2