Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02173/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02173-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIGUEL DIAZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

MATHHEW STAINER et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-2173 JAM KJN P (TEMP)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On November 12, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to file a complaint that complies with 

the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local 

Rules of Practice within thirty days. On January 7, 2016, the court granted plaintiff an additional 

thirty days to comply with the court’s order. That thirty-day period has now passed, and plaintiff 

has not filed a complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:15-cv-02173-JAM-DB Document 10 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: February 19, 2016

diaz2173.ftc

Case 2:15-cv-02173-JAM-DB Document 10 Filed 02/19/16 Page 2 of 2