Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-14-02698/USCOURTS-ca8-14-02698-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2698

___________________________

Reginald Clemons

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

George Lombardi, MDOC Director, Individual Capacity; John/Jane Doe, General

Counsel, Individual Capacity; Troy Steele, Warden, PCC, Individual Capacity;

Brenda Ross, Litigation Officer, Individual Capacity; Douglas Nickelson, Phone

Monitor, Individual Capacity; Timothy Lancaster, Investigator, Individual Capacity

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants

Daniel Dicus, Correctional Officer, Individual Capacity; Jeff Harper, Correctional

Officer, Individual Capacity; Thomas Collins, Disciplinary Hearing Officer,

Individual Capacity

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

John/Jane Doe, Functional Unit Manager, Individual Capacity; Christine Henson,

Correctional Officer, Individual Capacity; Matt Briesacher

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

Appellate Case: 14-2698 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Entry ID: 4253960 
Submitted: March 5, 2015

Filed: March 13, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Reginald Clemons appeals following entry of final judgment

by the district court in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the

1

record and considered Clemons’s arguments for reversal, we conclude that, for the

reasons expressed in the district court’s relevant orders, the court (1) properly

dismissed, for failure to state a claim, Clemons’s claim regarding telephone calls; (2)

properly granted summary judgment on his retaliation claim; and (3) did not abuse

its broad discretion in denying injunctive relief, and in refusing to compel additional

discovery. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, Chief Judge, United States District Court

1

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

Appellate Case: 14-2698 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Entry ID: 4253960