Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00497/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00497-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 In fact, on June 13, 2007, the Findings and Recommendations were returned to the Court with a notation 1

that inmate was gone. (Court Doc. 10.) Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f) each party is under a continuing duty to

inform the Court of any change of address. Absent such notice, service of documents at the prior address of record

of the party is effective service. Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE MACIEL-BAZAN,

Petitioner,

v.

BERNIE ELLIS, Warden

Respondent.

 /

CV F 06-0497 OWW DLB HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND

DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER

JUDGMENT

[Doc. 9]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On June 4, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that the

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED. This Findings and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30)

days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed

objections.

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the

Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Case 1:06-cv-00497-OWW -DLB Document 11 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued June 4, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and 

3. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Respondent. IT IS SO

ORDERED.

Emm0d6Dated: August 1, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00497-OWW -DLB Document 11 Filed 08/01/07 Page 2 of 2