Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02406/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02406-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CMC 

CASE NO.: C06-2406 MJJ

P:\CLIENTS\GLACL\Franks Glass\Pleadings\Request for Continuance of CMC 041707.DOC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN: 124607) 

Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN: 172509) 

SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 

120 Howard Street, Suite 520 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 882-7900 

Facsimile: (415) 882-9287 

mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com 

mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GLAZIERS, 

et al. PENSION PLAN, et al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GLAZIERS, 

ARCHITECTURAL METAL AND GLASS 

WORKERS PENSION PLAN, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

JOHN CORTEZ dba FRANK’S GLASS, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: C 06-2406 MJJ 

PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Date: April 24, 2007 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

 Plaintiffs again submit a Request for Continuance of the Case Management Conference 

currently scheduled for February 20, 2007 at 2:00 p.m., to allow the matter to be resolved between 

the parties. 

 1. The complaint in this action was filed on April 6, 2006 to compel defendant to 

allow plaintiffs to audit its records in accordance with its collective bargaining agreement, and for 

payment of any amount found due upon audit. 

2. The Defendants did not make an appearance in this action, but agreed to an 

audit date of July 17, 2006. Plaintiffs therefore requested, and the Court ordered, that the Case 

Management Conference set for July 18, 2006 be continued, to October 3, 2006. 

Case 3:06-cv-02406-MJJ Document 15 Filed 04/17/2007 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-02406-MJJ Document 16 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 4
PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CMC 

CASE NO.: C06-2406 MJJ

P:\CLIENTS\GLACL\Franks Glass\Pleadings\Request for Continuance of CMC 041707.DOC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. On September 20, 2006, the Court vacated that conference and rescheduled it for 

October 17, 2006. The Court then continued that conference to December 19, 2006, to allow 

Plaintiffs’ auditors time to complete their report. 

4. Just prior to that date Plaintiffs’ auditors completed their report, and the Court 

again reset the conference date, to February 20, 2007, to allow the report to be sent to Defendant 

for a 10 day review or response, followed by billing for payment to be made. 

 5. The audit report, then billing, was sent to Defendant’s accountant, with whom the 

auditors dealt. In the absence of any response the billing was again sent, directly to Defendant, 

with a response date of February 5, 2007. 

6. There was no response by February 14, 2007when the Court again continued the 

Case Management Conference, to April 24, 2007, to allow time for Plaintiffs to file their Motion 

for Default Judgment. However, the following day on February 15, 2007, Defendant provided a 

Declaration to Plaintiffs. Thereafter, the auditor’s report was revised accordingly, reviewed, and 

revised further. The final revised report was sent to the Defendant last week, on April 12, 2007, 

and to the Plaintiffs’ administrator for billing to the Defendant. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:06-cv-02406-MJJ Document 15 Filed 04/17/2007 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-02406-MJJ Document 16 Filed 04/20/07 Page 2 of 4
PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CMC 

CASE NO.: C06-2406 MJJ

P:\CLIENTS\GLACL\Franks Glass\Pleadings\Request for Continuance of CMC 041707.DOC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7. Plaintiffs therefore again request a continuance of the Case Management 

Conference for a period of approximately 60 days to allow for Defendant to make the payment 

to resolve this action, or in the alternative, for Plaintiffs’ preparation and service of a Motion for 

Default Judgment. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: April 17, 2007 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 

 By:________________/s/________________ 

 Muriel B. Kaplan 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ORDER

 The Case Management Conference scheduled in this matter for April 24, 2007, at 2:00 

p.m. is hereby continued to at 2:00 p.m. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: _________________________ ________________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-02406-MJJ Document 15 Filed 04/17/2007 Page 3 of 4

June 19, 2007 4/20/2007

Case 3:06-cv-02406-MJJ Document 16 Filed 04/20/07 Page 3 of 4
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CMC 

Case No.: C06-2406 MJJ 

P:\Clients\GLACL\Franks Glass\Pleadings\Request for Continuance of CMC 121206doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

 I, the undersigned, declare: 

 I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 

eighteen and not a party to this action. My business address is 120 Howard Street, Suite 520, San 

Francisco, California 94105 

 On April 17, 2007, I served the foregoing document(s) on the parties to this action, 

addressed as follows, in the manner described below: 

PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

5 MAIL, being familiar with the practice of this office for the collection and the processing 

of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and deposited in the 

United States Mail copies of the same to the business addresses set forth below, in a sealed 

envelope fully prepared. 

 FACSIMILE be causing said document(s) to be transmitted by Facsimile machine to the 

number indicated after the address(es) set forth below. 

 UPS for delivery the following business day by placing same for collection by UPS to the 

business addresses set forth below. 

 PERSONAL DELIVERY by placing said document(s) in a sealed envelope and causing 

it to be personally delivered to the address(es) set forth below. 

 ELECTRONICALLY be causing said document(s) to be transmitted by Email to the 

address(es) set forth below. 

Addressed to: John Cortez

 Frank’s Glass

 1652 Berrywood Drive 

 San Jose, CA 95133

 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this 

declaration was executed on this 17th day of February, 2007, at San Francisco, California. 

_______________/s/__________________ 

 Vanessa de Fábrega 

Case 3:06-cv-02406-MJJ Document 15 Filed 04/17/2007 Page 4 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-02406-MJJ Document 16 Filed 04/20/07 Page 4 of 4