Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02190/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02190-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SARA MCENROE,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-02190-HSG 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT 

LEAVE TO FILE MULTIPLE 

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

At the case management conference on September 29, 2015, Defendant AT&T Mobility 

Services LLC indicated that it wished to file an “early” motion for summary judgment focused 

solely on whether Plaintiff Sara McEnroe’s claim for unlawful termination in violation of public 

policy is barred by the statute of limitations. The Court ordered Defendant to file a letter brief by 

December 4, 2015 summarizing the evidence and argument it would present in support of any 

such early motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. No. 36.

The Court is in receipt of both Defendant’s timely filed letter brief and Plaintiff’s 

responsive letter brief filed December 9, 2015. Based on these filings, the Court finds that the 

record is not yet sufficiently developed to allow the Court to resolve the statute of limitations issue 

as a matter of law. Accordingly, the Court in its discretion DENIES leave to Defendant to file 

multiple motions for summary judgment. Of course, Defendant may file a motion for summary 

judgment, on any issue it thinks appropriate, at any time that complies with the Court’s Scheduling 

Order. See Dkt. No. 36. However, if Defendant does not prevail on that summary judgment 

motion, the Court will not allow it to file a second motion for summary judgment. 

Case 4:15-cv-02190-HSG Document 44 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

In light of the Court’s ruling, the deadline to hear Defendant’s early motion for summary 

judgment, currently set for January 28, 2016, is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 14, 2015

________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cv-02190-HSG Document 44 Filed 12/14/15 Page 2 of 2