Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02922/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02922-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RASH GHOSH,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF BERKELEY, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C-14-2922 MMC

ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO ALTER

JUDGMENT

The Court is in receipt of a “Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment,” filed June 30,

2015, which filing has been submitted by plaintiff Rash Ghosh, who asserts in the caption

of said motion that he is proceeding “pro se.”

Plaintiff is represented in the above-titled action by attorneys Julia Swanson and

Larry Peluso of Swanson & Peluso. (See Orders, filed March 10, 2015.) Counsel has not

sought to withdraw, and, indeed, cannot withdraw in the absence of a court order. See

Civil L.R. 5-1(c)(2)(D); Civil L.R. 11-5. Consequently, as plaintiff is represented by counsel,

he may not file documents pro se.

Accordingly, the “Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment” is hereby STRICKEN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 2, 2015 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-02922-MMC Document 128 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 1