Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05488/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05488-51/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C-07-05488 EDL

ORDER DENYING NETAPP’S MOTION

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO

FILE UNDER SEAL NETAPP’S REPLY

BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.

5,632,012 AND EXHIBIT THERETO

In connection with NetApp’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement of U.S. Patent No.5,632,012 and declaration in support thereof, NetApp filed an

administrative motion to file under seal the unredacted version of its Reply brief, as well as Exhibit

2 of the Walter Declaration in Support, on the basis that Sun had previously designated certain

information contained in these documents “Attorney’s Eyes Only.” See Dkt. No. 318. On March

31, 2010, Sun filed a response stating that these documents to not need to be filed under seal. 

Accordingly, NetApp’s Motion (Docket # 318) is DENIED and the unredacted Reply and Exhibit 2

will be made part of the public record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2010

__________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cv-05488-EDL Document 364 Filed 04/27/10 Page 1 of 1