Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01423/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01423-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

MATT GONZALEZ (SBN 153486) 

G. WHITNEY LEIGH (SBN 153457) 

BRIAN BRAZIER (SBN 245004) 

GONZALEZ & LEIGH, LLP 

Two Shaw Alley, 3rd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 512-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 512-2001 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

MICHAEL CEREMELLO 

BRUCE A. KILDAY (SBN 66415) 

SUSAN A. DENARDO (SBN 235166) 

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF 

Attorneys at law 

601 University Avenue, Suite 150 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Telephone: (916) 564-6100 

Facsimile: (916) 564-6263 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF DIXON, MAYOR MARY ANN COURVILLE, 

VICE-MAYOR GIL VEGA, COUNCILMAN LOREN FERRERO, 

COUNCILWOMAN JILL DISNEY ORR, CITY MANAGER 

WARREN SALMONS, DIXON POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

POLICE CHIEF DON MORT AND POLICE CAPTAIN LOU KALISH 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MICHAEL CEREMELLO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF DIXON, et al., 

 

Defendants. 

Case No. CIV S-04-01423 RRB-EFB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING DISCOVERY 

Judge Ralph R. Beistline 

WHEREAS the court recently extended the discovery cutoff and the date for filing 

dispositive motions in this case; 

WHEREAS plaintiff seeks to issue interrogatories, of which there are more than 25, 

which is the limit allowed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 33; 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-01423-JAM-EFB Document 98 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 2
WHEREAS additional interrogatories directed to defendants’ affirmative defense are 

necessary to allow plaintiff to fully prepare his case; 

The parties hereto, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate that 

the plaintiff be permitted to file 40 special interrogatories, provided that the interrogatories are 

not duplicative of those already promulgated by plaintiff. The parties also stipulate that any 

discovery previously produced by defendants need not be produced in response to plaintiff’s 

additional discovery requests. 

The parties respectfully request that the court approve this stipulation to allow plaintiff to 

file forty special interrogatories. 

 

Dated: ________________ GONZALEZ & LEIGH, LLP 

 By: _____________________ 

 Brian Brazier 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: _________________ ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF 

 By: _____________________ 

 Susan Denardo 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _02/25/2008_____________________ 

 /s/ Ralph R. Beistline________________

 The Honorable RALPH R. BEISTLINE 

United States District Court Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-01423-JAM-EFB Document 98 Filed 02/25/08 Page 2 of 2