Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00432/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00432-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark

---

United SFor thtates District e Northern District of CaCourt lifornia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE HERMETIC ORDER OF THE GOLDEN

DAWN, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DAVID J. GRIFFIN,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 05-00432 JSW

ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

The Court having been advised that this matter was fully settled before Magistrate Judge

James on January 17, 2007, and that the settlement was memorialized in writing and set forth on

the record, this Court issued an Order requesting a joint status report as to when the parties

expected the matter to be dismissed. The Court received a belated status report, which advised

that the parties expected to file a dismissal by February 1, 2007.

The Court has received Defendant/Counterclaimant David J. Griffin’s motion for

administrative relief with respect to the form of dismissal to be filed with the Court. The Court

does not require a response from Plaintiff/Counterdefendant. 

The Court HEREBY ORDERS the parties to continue to meet and confer regarding a

mutually acceptable form of dismissal. However, if the parties are unable to reach an agreement

by Friday, February 9, 2007, they shall file a notice which states simply that they have not

agreed upon a form of dismissal. Upon receipt of such a notice, the Court shall dismiss this

action (including all claims and counterclaims) with prejudice. In that Order, the Court shall

note the dismissal is “pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered on January 17,

Case 3:05-cv-00432-JSW Document 165 Filed 02/02/07 Page 1 of 2
United SFor thtates District e Northern District of CaCourt lifornia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2007,” and shall state in the Order of Dismissal that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the

matter to enforce the Settlement Agreement upon a motion brought by either party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 2, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-00432-JSW Document 165 Filed 02/02/07 Page 2 of 2