Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01532/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01532-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FELIPE VALADEZ, SR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

D. GILL, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-1532 KJM AC P 

ORDER 

 On October 16, 2013, plaintiff filed “objections” to the magistrate judge’s order filed 

October 1, 2013, objecting to that portion of the order denying plaintiff’s request for counsel. 

The court construes the objections as a request for reconsideration. Pursuant to Local Rule 

303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 

Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that the magistrate judge’s ruling was not 

clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the 

magistrate judge filed October 1, 2013, is affirmed. 

DATED: January 10, 2014. 

Case 2:13-cv-01532-KJM-AC Document 18 Filed 01/10/14 Page 1 of 1