Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STORUS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff

 v.

RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC., et al.,

Defendants /

No. C 06-2454 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPY IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On March 14, 2007, defendants AROA Marketing, Inc., and Skymall, Inc.,

electronically filed a Motion to Consolidate Action, Reschedule Action and Stay Discovery

Pending Settlement Conference and a Motion to Shorten Time for Hearing on Motion for

Consolidation, Rescheduling, and Stay of Discovery. Defendants have violated General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s

Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed

electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked

‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and

‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders

For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 81 Filed 03/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

documents. Defendants are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply with the

Court’s Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 81 Filed 03/16/07 Page 2 of 2