Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03181/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03181-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C-04-3181 (MJJ)

SUSAN MUCK (CSB No. 126930) 

smuck@fenwick.com 

JENNIFER C. BRETAN (CSB No. 233475) 

jbretan@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

275 Battery Street, Suite 1500 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

EMMETT C. STANTON (CSB No. 83930) 

estanton@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Defendants INVISION 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SERGIO MAGISTRI and 

ROSS MULHOLLAND 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE INVISION TECHNOLOGIES, 

INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 

Case No. C-04-3181 (MJJ) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING 

SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED 

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

This Stipulation is entered into by and among lead Plaintiffs, Glazer Capital Management, 

LP and Glazer Offshore Fund, Ltd. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants InVision Technologies, Inc. 

(“InVision”), Sergio Magistri and Ross Mulholland (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through 

their respective attorneys of record, as follows: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint on February 22, 

2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties previously agreed to briefing and hearing schedules for 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in this matter, which were approved by this Court on March 16, 

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 93 Filed 06/15/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 95 Filed 06/15/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. C-04-3181 (MJJ) 2 

2006 and April 26, 2006, respectively; 

WHEREAS unexpected client demands and a number of scheduling conflicts have arisen 

on short notice including, among other things, responding to a threatened preliminary injunction 

and court ordered expedited discovery on another matter and a direct time conflict resulting from 

coverage for a departing colleague, Defendants’ counsel requested that Plaintiffs’ counsel agree 

to a revised briefing and hearing schedule, and an agreement was reached as to a revised 

schedule, subject to the Court’s next available hearing date, which Defendants are informed by 

the Courtroom Deputy is July 25, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 

6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12 that: 

(1) Defendants’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before 

June 27, 2006; and 

(4) The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be on July 25, 2006, at 

9:30am, or such other date and time as the Court may find convenient. 

Dated: June 15, 2006 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: s/Susan S. Muck 

 Susan S. Muck 

Attorneys for Defendants 

INVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; SERGIO 

MAGISTRI and ROSS MULHOLLAND 

Dated: June 15, 2006 ABRAHAM, FRUCHTER & TWERSKY, LLP 

By: s/Lawrence D. Levit 

 Lawrence D. Levit 

Lead Counsel for the Plaintiffs 

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 93 Filed 06/15/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 95 Filed 06/15/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. C-04-3181 (MJJ) 3 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________, 2006 

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

United States District Judge 

23570/00404/SF/5171780 

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 93 Filed 06/15/2006 Page 3 of 3

6/15/2006

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 95 Filed 06/15/06 Page 3 of 3