Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05331/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05331-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DERRICK RABBI STRONG,

Plaintiff, CV F 04 5331 AWI WMW P

vs. ORDER

 CSP CORCORAN, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has screened plaintiff’s May 3, 2006,

second amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and finds that it appears to state

cognizable claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant Villapueda for exceeive

force, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Specifically, Plaintiff was advised in the order of

June 27, 2006, that the second amended complaint stated a claim against Villapueda, and failed

to state a claim as to the remaining defendants. Plaintiff was granted leave to file a third

amended complaint. Plaintiff failed to file a third amended complaint.

 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

H. Villapueda

Case 1:04-cv-05331-MJS Document 23 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, a

Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

second amended complaint filed May 3, 2006.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to

the court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Two copies of the endorsed second amended complaint filed May 3, 2006. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 21, 2006 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05331-MJS Document 23 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 2