Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02980/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02980-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT ELLIOT,

Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-2980 KJN P

vs.

S. READDY, et al., ORDER and

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Pursuant to this court’s screening of plaintiff’s original complaint pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(a), the court found that the complaint may state cognizable claims against 1

defendants Fransham, Walker, Readdy, Moumeror, Paramvir, Gabriel, Beck, Liu, Cui, the

McHenry Medical Group, Doctors Hospital of Manteca, and Doctor’s Medical Center of

Modesto, but did not state a claim against defendants Liau or Purvis. (Dkt. No. 7.) The court

gave plaintiff the option of proceeding on his original complaint or filing an amended complaint

that added a cognizable claim against defendants Liau and Purvis. Plaintiff chose to proceed on

his original complaint, effectively choosing to terminate this action against defendants Liau or

Purvis.

 This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Local 1

General Order No. 262, and Local Rule 302(c).

1

Case 2:10-cv-02980-MCE-KJN Document 17 Filed 04/09/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly

assign a district judge to this case. 

In addition, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants Liau and Purvis

be dismissed without prejudice from this action.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 21 days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 6, 2012

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

elli2980.14option.fr.kjn

2

Case 2:10-cv-02980-MCE-KJN Document 17 Filed 04/09/12 Page 2 of 2