Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00531/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00531-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Attorneys for Defendants,

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; DETECTIVE DARREN MAYO, 

in his official capacity as an employee of Sacramento County; DEPUTIES

S. PUFFER, T. HENRY, J. HALK, T. FOX, K. CLARK, L. KENDRICK, 

C. GRIFFITH, T. MOHLER, C. ALBRIGHT, T. MCCUE, D. ANDERSON,

L. CRISTOSTOMO, M. HAYNES, SERGEANT PARKER and K-9, in their

official capacities as employees of the County of Sacramento; and SACRAMENTO

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADRIENNE G. HENNING,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CIV S-05-0531 FCD KJM

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(1) & (2)]

Complaint Filed: March 17, 2005

It is hereby stipulated, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) and (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, by and between the plaintiff, ADRIENNE G. HENNING, in pro per, and defendants

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, DETECTIVE DARREN MAYO, in his official capacity as an

Employee of the County of Sacramento, DEPUTIES S. PUFFER, T. HENRY, J. HALK, T.

FOX, K. CLARK, L. KENDRICK, C. GRIFFITH, T. MOHLER, C. ALBRIGHT, T. MCCUE,

D. ANDERSON, L. CRISTOSTOMO, M. HAYNES, SERGEANT PARKER and K-9, in their

official capacities as Employees of the County of Sacramento and SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, by and through their attorney, Jonathan B. Paul, that the aboveMORENO & RIVERA, LLP

1451 River Park Drive, Suite 145

Sacramento, California 95815

Tel: 916-922-1200 Fax: 916 922-1301

Jesse M. Rivera, CSN 84259

Jonathan B. Paul, CSN 215884

Shanan L. Hewitt, CSN 200168

Case 2:05-cv-00531-FCD-KJM Document 43 Filed 04/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice [FRCP 41(a)(1)&(2)]

Page 2

captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice forthwith.

Dated: March 14, 2007

_________________________________________

ADRIENNE G. HENNING, In Pro Per

Dated: March 14, 2007 MORENO & RIVERA, LLP

 JONATHAN B. PAUL

Attorney for Defendants, COUNTY OF

SACRAMENTO; DETECTIVE DARREN

MAYO, in his official capacity as an employee of

Sacramento County; DEPUTIES S. PUFFER, T.

HENRY, J. HALK, T. FOX, K. CLARK, L.

KENDRICK, C. GRIFFITH, T. MOHLER, C.

ALBRIGHT, T. MCCUE, D. ANDERSON,

L. CRISTOSTOMO, M. HAYNES, SERGEANT

PARKER and K-9, in their official capacities as

employees of the County of Sacramento; and

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT.

In consideration of the Stipulation entered by the parties, the Henning v. County of

Sacramento et. al., United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. CIV S05-0531 FCD KJM is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(a)(1) and (2). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 2, 2007

Case 2:05-cv-00531-FCD-KJM Document 43 Filed 04/03/07 Page 2 of 2