Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-06043/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-06043-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTOLIN A. MARKS,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

SPRINT CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C09-6043 BZ

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

TO DISMISS ACTION

On January 5, 2010, I denied plaintiff’s application to

proceed in forma pauperis and required him to pay the filing

fee by February 1, 2010. Plaintiff has failed to do so and

has not consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. I am

therefore having this case reassigned and recommend that it be

dismissed for lack of prosecution.

The reasons for my denial included the fact that

plaintiff appears to be gainfully employed and has a positive

cash flow and the fact that the injuries of which he complains

///

///

Case 4:09-cv-06043-PJH Document 5 Filed 04/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

were to his business which is immigration defense. See e.g.

paragraph 29 of the complaint. 

Dated: April 1, 2010 

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\MARKS V. SPRINT\RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION.wpd

Case 4:09-cv-06043-PJH Document 5 Filed 04/01/10 Page 2 of 2