Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-02531/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-02531-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

U.A. LOCAL 342 JOINT LABORMANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, et al.,

Plaintiffs.

 v.

AIRTEKS MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., 

Defendant. _______________________________________

No. C 04-2531 SBA

 

ORDER

[Docket No. 9]

On June 24, 2004, Plaintiffs filed a complaint against Defendant Airteks Mechanical Services,

Inc. ("Defendant") [Docket No. 1]. 

On October 12, 2004, the clerk entered default against Defendant [Docket No. 7].

On November 12, 2004, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant

[Docket No. 9].

On November 17, 2004, this Court referred Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment to Magistrate

Judge Zimmerman for a report and recommendation [Docket No. 17]. 

On December 15, 2004, Judge Zimmerman held a hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Default

Judgment. At the hearing, Plaintiffs were unable to explain the notable difference between the amount

of damages sought in the complaint and the amount sought in their Motion for Default Judgment. Judge

Zimmerman granted Plaintiffs one week to elect whether they wished to amend the complaint or to file

supplemental documentation. On December 22, 2004, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint.

On January 3, 2005, Judge Zimmerman issued his Report and Recommendation [Docket No.

25]. In the Report, Judge Zimmerman recommended denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Default

Judgment as moot, in light of Plaintiffs' decision to file an amended complaint.

Case 4:04-cv-02531-SBA Document 30 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 For good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Magistrate Judge Zimmerman's Report and Recommendation

[Docket No. 25] is ADOPTED by this Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment [Docket No. 9] is

DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 Dated: 8/29/05 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-02531-SBA Document 30 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 2