Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05353/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05353-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN RADILLO, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

M. CHAMALBIDE, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

NO. 1:04-cv-05353-GSA-PC

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR 

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c)(1). 

On May 24, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. In his notice, Plaintiff

indicated that he is no longer able to litigate this case. Specifically, Plaintiff indicated that it was

“beyond his means” to produce witnesses, and his lack of resources rendered him unable to

litigate this case. Defendant filed a Statement of Non-Opposition.

Plaintiff titled his notice as a “Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice; Request For

Settlement Intervention.” Plaintiff indicated that “this case can easily be resolved by a

settlement conference, mediated by the Court, which is what Plaintiff would prefer.” 

On April 21, 2010, an order to show cause was entered, directing Plaintiff to show cause

within thirty days why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 110 for

Case 1:04-cv-05353-GSA Document 96 Filed 07/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff’s failure to file a status report. Plaintiff failed to file a status report in response to the

order to show cause. On June 11, 2010, an order was entered, advising Plaintiff that the Court

would not schedule a settlement conference, and would not dismiss this action contingent upon

the scheduling of a settlement conference. Plaintiff was advised that should he desire to proceed

with this action, he must file a status report in accordance with the order of February 19, 2010. 

The Court granted Plaintiff an extension of time in which to notify the Court regarding his

intention to proceed with this action. Plaintiff was specifically cautioned that should he fail to

respond to this order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 110. 

The thirty day period in which to respond has passed, and Plaintiff has not responded to the order

of June 11, 2010. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice

pursuant to Local Rule 110 for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to close this

case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 15, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:04-cv-05353-GSA Document 96 Filed 07/16/10 Page 2 of 2