Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-07272/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-07272-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AUDREY BISHOP, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CORDIS CORPORATION,

Defendant. /

No. C 16-07272 WHA

ORDER CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT DEADLINES

The Court has considered defendant’s unopposed motion to continue case management

deadlines (Dkt. No. 17). The case management conference in this matter is continued from

April 6 to the FOURTH THURSDAY after our court of appeals decides Dunson v. Cordis, Case

No. 17-15257. The case management statement is due SEVEN DAYS before the case

management conference. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint under

FRCP 12 at least FOURTEEN DAYS before the case management conference.

If Dunson has not been decided by JULY 6, then by NOON on that date, both sides shall

submit a joint status report on the progress of the appeal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-07272-WHA Document 18 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 1