Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00324/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00324-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

CASE NO. C06-00324 CW

Ian N. Feinberg (SBN 88324)

ifeinberg@mayerbrown.com

Eric B. Evans (SBN 232476)

eevans@mayerbrown.com

MAYER BROWN LLP

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300

3000 El Camino Real

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112

Telephone: (650) 331-2000

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FREECYCLESUNNYVALE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

FREECYCLESUNNYVALE,

a California unincorporated association,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE FREECYCLE NETWORK,

an Arizona corporation,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-00324 CW

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL

JUDGMENT

THE FREECYCLE NETWORK, INC., an

Arizona Corporation,

Counterclaimant,

v.

FREECYCLESUNNYVALE, a California

unincorporated association,

Counterdefendant.

Case 4:06-cv-00324-CW Document 146 Filed 05/20/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

CASE NO. C06-00324 CW

Plaintiff FreecycleSunnyvale (“Sunnyvale”) and Defendant The Freecycle Network, Inc.,

stipulate and agree that judgment be entered as follows:

(1) Final judgment is entered in Sunnyvale’s favor on:

a. Sunnyvale’s First Claim for Relief for Declaratory Judgment of NonInfringement of Trademarks under 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq.;

b. The Freecycle Network’s Counterclaim for Trademark Infringement under the

Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a);

c. The Freecycle Network’s Counterclaim for Unfair Competition under the

Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)

for the reasons set forth in the Order Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion for

Summary Judgment and Denying It in Part and Granting Defendant’s Motion to

Strike (“Order”). Dkt. no. 141.

(2) Sunnyvale’s Second Claim for Relief for Tortious Interference with Business

Relations is dismissed with prejudice.

(3) The Freecycle Network’s Counterclaim for Unfair Competition under the

California Business and Professions Code, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 and

17500, is dismissed with prejudice

(4) Each side shall bear its costs and fees of suit and neither side shall be considered a

prevailing party for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1).

///

///

///

Case 4:06-cv-00324-CW Document 146 Filed 05/20/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

CASE NO. C06-00324 CW

2

The purpose of this judgment is to allow The Freecycle Network to appeal this judgment

to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. For the avoidance of doubt, neither side shall

seek to appeal from the stipulated dismissal of claims described in (2) & (3) above.

Dated: May 15, 2008 MAYER BROWN LLP

IAN N. FEINBERG

ERIC B. EVANS

BY: /s/ Ian N. Feinberg

Ian N. Feinberg

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FREECYCLESUNNYVALE

Dated: May 15, 2008 KING & SPALDING LLP

LISA KOBIALKA

By: /s/ Lisa Kobialka

Lisa Kobialka

Attorneys for Defendant

THE FREECYCLE NETWORK, INC.

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section

X(B), the filer hereby attests that the signatories’ concurrence in

the filing of this document has been obtained.

For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Order of March 13, 2008, Docket no. 141,

and upon stipulation of the parties,

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED.

Dated:

Hon. Claudia Wilken

U.S. District Judge

5/20/08

Case 4:06-cv-00324-CW Document 146 Filed 05/20/08 Page 3 of 3