Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03664/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03664-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Johnny Angel Pacheco, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 05-3664-PHX-ROS (GEE)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On November 15, 2005, the plaintiff filed a complaint in this court claiming his

constitutional rights are being violated by his conditions of confinement. On January 3,

2006, this court screened the complaint and ordered commencement of service. Service

packets were sent to the plaintiff for processing. The court specifically warned the plaintiff

he must complete service within 60 days of the filing of the screening order or within the

120-day time limit allowed by FED.R.CIV.P. 4(m), whichever is later. See LRCiv.

16.2(b)(2)(B)(i). The plaintiff was explicitly warned failure to accomplish timely service

could result in dismissal of the action. The time limits have passed, but service has not been

completed. 

On March 23, 2006, this court issued the plaintiff an order to show cause why this

case should not be dismissed. The plaintiff did not file a response. 

Case 2:05-cv-03664-ROS-GEE Document 6 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Recommendation

 The Magistrate Judge recommends the District Court, after its independent review of

the record, enter an order 

DISMISSING this action for failure to prosecute.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636 (b), any party may serve and file written objections within

10 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. If objections are

not timely filed, the party’s right to de novo review may be waived. See United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900

(2003). 

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this report and recommendation to all parties.

DATED this 12th day of April, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03664-ROS-GEE Document 6 Filed 04/12/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

Case 2:05-cv-03664-ROS-GEE Document 6 Filed 04/12/06 Page 3 of 3