Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01699-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYDNEY BROOKE ROBERTS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND 

REDEVELOPMENT AGENY, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:22-cv-1699-DJC-AC PS

ORDER

Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On May 3, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 

herein which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that 

any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twentyone days. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiffs have filed objections to the findings and 

recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 

304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully 

reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

////

Case 2:22-cv-01699-DJC-AC Document 46 Filed 11/08/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 3, 2023, are adopted in full; 

and

2. Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 26) is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 8, 2023 

Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-01699-DJC-AC Document 46 Filed 11/08/23 Page 2 of 2