Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01124/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01124-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The opposition was dated October 9, 2007, filed on October 11, 2007, and docketed on October 12, 2007. 

1

Even applying the mail box rule, the opposition was more than one month overdue at the time it was mailed. See

Caldwell v. Amend, 30 F.3d 1199, 1202 (9th Cir. 1994); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988).

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOYLE WAYNE DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GAIL LEWIS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-01124-LJO-SMS PC

ORDER DISREGARDING UNTIMELY

OPPOSITION 

(Doc. 61) 

On October 11, 2007, the Court issued an order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss and

dismissing this action. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion, which was due on or before September

4, 2007, was subsequently received on October 11, 2007, and docketed on October 12, 2007. (Docs.

57, 61.) Plaintiff’s opposition was not timely filed and was not received by the undersigned for

consideration until after dismissal of this action. The untimely opposition is therefore 1

DISREGARDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01124-LJO -SMS Document 64 Filed 10/12/07 Page 1 of 1