Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02529/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02529-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

Theodore B. Olson (#38137)

Helgi C. Walker (Pro Hac Vice Pending)

Michael R. Huston (#278488)

Jacob T. Spencer (Pro Hac Vice Pending)

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20036-5306

Telephone: 202.955.8668

Facsimile: 202.530.9575

Joshua S. Lipshutz (#242557)

Joshua D. Dick (#268853)

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

555 Mission Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921

Telephone: 415.393.8233

Facsimile: 415.374.8469

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CTIA – The Wireless Association®

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CTIA – THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION®,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE CITY OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA,

and CHRISTINE DANIEL, CITY 

MANAGER OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA, 

in her official capacity,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-02529-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND 

HEARING SCHEDULE

Stipulation Re Briefing and Hearing Schedule

No. 3:15-cv-02529-EMC

(Modified)

Case 3:15-cv-02529-EMC Document 20 Filed 06/15/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

RECITALS

1. On June 8, 2015, Plaintiff CTIA – The Wireless Association® (“CTIA”) filed a 

motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. 4), requesting this Court to preliminarily enjoin all 

Defendants from enforcing or causing to be enforced Berkeley Municipal Code Chapter 9.96 (the 

“Ordinance”) before the Ordinance was to go into effect on June 25, 2015, pending final judgment.

2. CTIA noticed a hearing regarding the motion for preliminary injunction on July 17, 

2015, at 10:00 am, or as soon thereafter as would be convenient for this Court.

3. According to the docket (Dkt. 4), Defendants’ Response to CTIA’s motion for 

preliminary injunction is due June 22, 2015. CTIA’s Reply is due June 29, 2015.

4. On June 9, 2015, the parties filed a joint stipulation with a proposed order regarding a

stay and a briefing schedule (Dkt. 16), explaining that the Defendant City of Berkeley, California had 

agreed to stay the Ordinance pending orderly adjudication of the preliminary injunction motion, and 

asking this Court to vacate the current briefing schedule and request for a hearing date.

5. Pursuant to the joint stipulation, the parties have met and conferred, and respectfully 

propose the schedule below for briefing and hearing of CTIA’s motion for preliminary relief.

6. With respect to the hearing date, all counsel are available on July 23, 2015, at 1:30 

pm.

STIPULATION

The parties accordingly stipulate as follows:

1. The Defendants will file their opposition to CTIA’s motion by July 6, 2015.

2. CTIA will file its reply memorandum by July 20, 2015.

3. CTIA’s motion will be heard on July 23, 2015, at 1:30 pm.

Stipulation Re Briefing and Hearing Schedule

No. 3:15-cv-02529-EMC

1

August 6, 2015

Case 3:15-cv-02529-EMC Document 20 Filed 06/15/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

June 12, 2015 By: /s/ Theodore B. Olson

Theodore B. Olson

Helgi C. Walker

Joshua S. Lipshutz

Joshua D. Dick

Michael R. Huston

Jacob T. Spencer

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CTIA – The Wireless Association®

June 12, 2015 By: **/s/ Zachary D. Cowan

Zach Cowan, City Attorney (#96372)

CITY OF BERKELEY

2180 Milvia Street, Fourth Floor

Berkeley, CA 94704

Telephone: 510.981.6998

Facsimile: 510.981.6960

Attorney for Defendants

City of Berkeley, California and 

Christine Daniel, City Manager of 

Berkeley, California

** Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the 

electronic signatory has obtained 

approval from this signatory.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

EDWARD M. CHEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Stipulation Re Briefing and Hearing Schedule

No. 3:15-cv-02529-EMC

2

(modified above) 6/15/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-02529-EMC Document 20 Filed 06/15/15 Page 3 of 3