Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03415/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03415-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

STIP. FOR DISMISSAL (ORD. NO. 98-15); 

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03415 EMC

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN, State Bar #241755 

JEREMY M. GOLDMAN, State Bar #218888

Deputy City Attorneys 

1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place 

City Hall, Room 234 

San Francisco, California 94102-4682 

Telephone: (415) 554-4633 

Facsimile: (415) 554-4699 

E-Mail: christine.van.aken@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THE AMERICAN BEVERAGE 

ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA RETAILERS 

ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA STATE 

OUTDOOR ADVERTISING 

ASSOCIATION, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03415 EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING COUNT I AND COUNT II OF 

COMPLAINT 

Trial Date: None set 

Case 3:15-cv-03415-EMC Document 76 Filed 06/03/16 Page 1 of 3
STIP. FOR DISMISSAL (ORD. NO. 98-15); 

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03415 EMC

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, Count I and Count II of Plaintiffs’ Complaint challenges San Francisco Ordinance 

No. 98-15 as in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; 

WHEREAS, subsequent to the filing of the Complaint, the City and County of San Francisco 

repealed Ordinance No. 98-15; and 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that Plaintiffs’ challenges to Ordinance No. 98-15 are now moot, 

the parties therefore now stipulate and agree that Count I and Count II of the Complaint shall be 

dismissed without prejudice, with each side to bear its own fees and costs respecting Count I and 

Count II of the Complaint, but nothing in this stipulation shall impact the parties’ rights with respect to 

their continuing dispute concerning the validity of San Francisco Ordinance No. 100-15. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 2, 2016 DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

WAYNE SNODGRASS 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN 

JEREMY M. GOLDMAN 

Deputy City Attorneys 

By: s/Christine Van Aken 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

Dated: June 2, 2016 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

By: *s/James K. Lynch 

JAMES K. LYNCH 

RICHARD P. BRESS 

MICHAEL E. BERN 

MARCY C. PRIEDEMAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

THE AMERICAN BEVERAGE ASSOCIATION 

Case 3:15-cv-03415-EMC Document 76 Filed 06/03/16 Page 2 of 3
STIP. FOR DISMISSAL (ORD. NO. 98-15); 

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03415 EMC

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: June 2, 2016 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By: *s/Theodore B. Olson 

THEODORE B. OLSON 

ANDREW S. TULUMELLO 

HELGI C. WALKER 

JACOB T. SPENCER 

CHARLES J. STEVENS 

JOSHUA D. DICK 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 CALIFORNIA STATE OUTDOOR 

 ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION 

Dated: June 2, 2016 KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP 

By: *s/Thomas S. Knox 

THOMAS S. KNOX 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 CALIFORNIA RETAILERS ASSOCIATION 

*Pursuant to GO 45, the electronic signatory has 

obtained approval from this signatory. 

ORDER 

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________ 

THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN 

United States District Judge 

6/3/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-03415-EMC Document 76 Filed 06/03/16 Page 3 of 3