Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01380/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01380-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 330
Nature of Suit: Federal Employers' Liability
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MICHAEL T. SHEPHERD, SBN 58813 

MARGARET L. GUNNELL, 88515 

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL T. SHEPHERD 

1074 EAST AVENUE, STE. O 

CHICO, CA 95926 

Phone: (530) 893-3700 

Fax: (530) 893-1579 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Clausen 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BARRY R. CLAUSEN, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF TEHAMA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CV-1380-FCD GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO HEAR MOTION 

“AS MODIFIED”

STIPULATION

 WHEREAS, the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, stipulate to extending the 

time of Defendants, County of Tehama, Probation Department of the County of Tehama, William 

Fleharty and Ms. Lou Peters, (hereafter “Defendants”) to have their Motion for Summary 

Judgment heard, currently scheduled for December 15, 2006; and 

 WHEREAS, because plaintiff’s counsel has a binding arbitration scheduled on 

December 15, 2006 in another matter; and 

Case 2:05-cv-01380-FCD-GGH Document 17 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants, through counsel, are willing to extend the time of 

Defendants to have their Motion for Summary Judgment heard to and including January 12, 2007 

with the Court’s permission: 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through 

their respective counsel, that with permission of the Court, Defendants may have to and including 

January 12, 2007 within which to have their Motion for Summary Judgment heard by this court. 

 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Defendants may have until December 1, 2006 to 

amend their Motion to raise and argue the case of Palmer vs. Regents, 107 Cal.App.4th 899 and 

that Plaintiff shall have up to and including December 21, 2006, in which to file and serve 

opposition papers. 

DATED: LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL T. SHEPHERD

 BY: /s/Michael T. Shepherd 

 MICHAEL T. SHEPHERD 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, BARRY R. CLAUSEN 

 

DATED: ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF

 BY: /s/Laurence L. Angelo 

 LAURENCE L. ANGELO 

 Attorneys for Defendants County of Tehama 

 William Fleharty and Ms. Lou Peters 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:05-cv-01380-FCD-GGH Document 17 Filed 11/27/06 Page 2 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER

 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND GOOD CAUSE 

APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing on Defendants Motion for Summary 

Judgment filed November 9, 2006 is hereby RESET for Friday, January 12, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may have until December 1, 2006 to amend 

their Motion, as stated in this stipulation and that Plaintiff shall have up to and including 

December 21, 2006, in which to file and serve opposition papers. Any reply shall be filed no later 

than December 29, 2006. 

 The parties are cautioned to ensure that the caption on all pleadings filed in this action 

accurately reflect the full case number: CIV S-05-1380 FCD GGH. 

DATED: November 27, 2006 

Case 2:05-cv-01380-FCD-GGH Document 17 Filed 11/27/06 Page 3 of 3