Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01179/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01179-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1640 Truth in Lending

---

15288/0001/784786.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

 WITH PREJUDICE

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MICHAEL J. STEINER (State Bar No. 112079) 

mjs@severson.com

REGINA J. McCLENDON (State Bar No. 184669) 

rjm@severson.com

ERIK KEMP (State Bar No. 246196) 

ek@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON 

A Professional Corporation 

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 398-3344 

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 

Attorneys for Defendants 

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 

COMPANY, as Indenture Trustee of the 

American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 

2005-2, and AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE 

INVESTMENT TRUST 2005-2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION 

ELVIN and PHYLLIS VALENZUELA, 

individually and on behalf of themselves and all 

others similarly situated 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

[ 

AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE 

INVESTMENT TRUST 2005-2, AMERICAN 

HOME MORTGAGE SECURITIES LLC, 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., DEUTSCHE 

BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY and 

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 1:08-cv-01179-OWW-SMS

ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE 

[Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 41(a)] 

Complaint Filed: August 12, 2008 

Trial Date: Not Set 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) Plaintiffs Elvin & Phyllis Valenzuela 

and Defendants American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2005-2 and Deutsche Bank National 

Trust Company have filed a Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice. 

/// 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:08-cv-01179-OWW -SMS Document 80 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

152

 

88/0001/784786.1 ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pursuant to that Stipulation, and good cause appearing, this action is hereby dismissed 

with prejudice as to the Plaintiffs’ individual claims and dismissed without prejudice as to the 

claims of the putative, uncertified class. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 26, 2010 

/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER

UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT 

COURT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:08-cv-01179-OWW -SMS Document 80 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2