Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01611/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01611-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

562961.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS

Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064)

Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260)

Peter E. Leckman (State Bar No. 235721)

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, 30th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-3339

Telephone: (415) 956-1000

Facsimile: (415) 956-1008

Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs 

eMag Solutions LLC, eMag Solutions Limited, 

Greencorp Magnetics Pty, Ltd., and Delta Magnetics, 

S.A. de C.V., and Individual Plaintiff Cintas VAC, S.A. 

de C.V.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

eMAG SOLUTIONS LLC, eMAG SOLUTIONS 

LIMITED, GREENCORP MAGNETICS PTY 

LTD., and DELTA MAGNETICS, S.A. de C.V., 

on behalf of themselves and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TODA KOGYO CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

CINTAS VAC, S.A. de C.V.

Plaintiff,

v.

TODA KOGYO CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

No. C-02-1611 PJH

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 261 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

562961.1 - 1 -

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS

This matter comes before the Court on the application of Plaintiffs’ counsel for 

reimbursement of half of the costs Plaintiffs’ counsel have incurred to date.

The Court, after consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel, and noting that no 

opposition has been made, and otherwise being fully informed, hereby grants Plaintiffs’ counsel’s 

request for $291,944.31, as reimbursement of half of the costs Plaintiffs’ counsel had incurred as 

of May 31, 2006. 

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Judge

9/21/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 261 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 2