Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05080/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05080-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. RE MOT. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC

DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452

JACOB VELTMAN, State Bar No. 247597

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

650 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050

Telephone: (650) 493-9300

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100

Email: dkramer@wsgr.com

Email: jveltman@wsgr.com

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SONG FI, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GOOGLE INC. and YOUTUBE, LLC,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:14-cv-05080-SC

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE RE PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Before: Hon. Samuel Conti

Case 4:14-cv-05080-CW Document 40 Filed 03/18/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. RE MOT. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC

-1-

WHEREAS, on February 2, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Partial Summary

Judgment and noticed it for hearing on March 20, 2015;

WHEREAS, on February 12, 2015, the Court continued the hearing on the Motion to

May 1, 2015 and extended Defendants’ time to file an Opposition to the Motion and Plaintiffs’

time to file a Reply to March 18, 2015 and April 20, 2015, respectively;

WHEREAS, Defendants seek a short extension of their time to respond to Plaintiffs’

Motion due to a recent death in the family of counsel for Defendants, as more fully explained in

the Declaration of Jacob T. Veltman filed concurrently herewith;

WHEREAS, the extension sought by Defendants will have no effect on the schedule for

the case as it will not affect the hearing date on the Motion;

THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows:

STIPULATION

1. The deadline for Defendants to file their Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial

Summary Judgment shall be extended to March 23, 2015.

2. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Reply in Support of their Motion for Partial

Summary Judgment shall be correspondingly extended to April 24, 2015.

DATED: March 18, 2015 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Jacob Veltman

Jacob Veltman

Attorneys for Defendants

DATED: March 18, 2015 COZEN O’CONNOR LLP

By: /s/ Erik L. Jackson

Erik L. Jackson

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 4:14-cv-05080-CW Document 40 Filed 03/18/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. RE MOT. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC

-2-

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

Honorable Samuel Conti

United States District Judge

03/18/2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 4:14-cv-05080-CW Document 40 Filed 03/18/15 Page 3 of 3