Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01211/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01211-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FELICIA CLARK, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-1211 JAM DB PS 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

 On July 26, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings 

and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections to 

the findings and recommendations. 

 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 26, 2016 (Dkt. No. 18) are 

adopted in full; 

Case 2:15-cv-01211-JAM-DB Document 21 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 2. Defendants’ January 8, 2016 motion to dismiss (Dkt No. 11) is granted in part 

and denied in part; 

 3. The complaint’s claims for illegal seizure, Monell, and violation of the ADA 

are dismissed with leave to amend; 

 4. Plaintiff is granted twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint that cures 

the defects noted in this order and complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the 

Local Rules of Practice1; and 

 5. If after the twenty-eight days has passed plaintiff has not filed an amended 

complaint, defendants are directed to file an answer within fourteen days to the complaint’s 

claims of retaliation, false arrest and excessive force. 

DATED: August 31, 2016 

 John A. Mendez___________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

/clark.jo

 

1

 It appears plaintiff has already filed an amended complaint in response to the findings and 

recommendations. 

Case 2:15-cv-01211-JAM-DB Document 21 Filed 08/31/16 Page 2 of 2