Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00487/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00487-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 08 0487 SC, Stipulation Re Extension of Time For Defendant EVA Airways to Respond to Complaint 

and Proposed Order 

Christopher T. Casamassima (CA Bar No. 211280) 

Email: ccasamassima@kirkland.com

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

777 South Figueroa Street 

Los Angeles, California 90017-5800 

Telephone: (213) 680-8400 

Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 

Attorneys for Defendant EVA Airways 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JUSTIN LABARGE, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS 

SIMILARLY SITUATED, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

AIR NEW ZEALAND, ALL NIPPON 

AIRWAYS, CATHAY PACIFIC 

AIRWAYS, CHINA AIRLINES, EVA 

AIRLINES, JAPAN AIRLINES 

INTERNATIONAL, MALAYSIA 

AIRLINES, NORTHWEST 

AIRLINES, QANTAS AIRWAYS, 

SINGAPORE AIR, THAI AIRWAYS, 

UNITED AIRLINES, 

 Defendants.

 Case No. C 08 0487 SC 

The Honorable Samuel Conti 

JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT 

TO LOCAL RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT AND 

CONTINUING COURT-ORDERED 

DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), and in light of the related “Motion for 

Transfer and Consolidation of Related Actions to the Northern District of California 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407” now pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict 

Litigation (“JPML”), Plaintiff Justin LaBarge (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant EVA 

Airways (“Defendant”), through counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

Case 3:08-cv-00487-CRB Document 14 Filed 02/21/08 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 08 0487 SC, Stipulation Re Extension of Time For Defendant EVA Airways to Respond to Complaint 

and Proposed Order 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant’s time to 

answer, move or otherwise plead is enlarged until the later of: (1) the date when 

Defendant would otherwise be required to a file a response pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 12; or (2) 45 days after the JPML grants, denies, or otherwise 

disposes of the pending motion. If a consolidated amended complaint is filed by 

Plaintiff in a single transferee Court and served on Defendant, Defendant’s time to 

answer, move, or otherwise plead is enlarged until 45 days after such service. 

This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by Defendant of any 

defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, 

subject matter jurisdiction, improper venue, sufficiency of service of process, or 

service of process. Nothing in this paragraph shall obligate Defendant to answer, 

move, or otherwise respond to any complaint until the time provided in the preceding 

paragraph. The above notwithstanding, should Defendant, except pursuant to court 

order, respond to any complaint in a related matter filed in this court or another United 

States District Court prior to the date contemplated by this stipulation, then such 

Defendant shall make a simultaneous response to the complaint in the abovecaptioned matter. 

Case 3:08-cv-00487-CRB Document 14 Filed 02/21/08 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 08 0487 SC, Stipulation Re Extension of Time For Defendant EVA Airways to Respond to Complaint 

and Proposed Order 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: February 19, 2008 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

By: /s/ Christopher T. Casamassima

 777 South Figueroa Street 

 Los Angeles, California 90017-5800 

 Telephone: (213) 680-8400 

 Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 

 Email: ccasamassima@kirkland.com

Counsel for Defendant EVA Airways 

 

Dated: February 19, 2008 SAVERI & SAVERI LLP 

By: /s/ Cadio Zirpoli (with authorization)

 111 Pine Street, Suite 1700 

 San Francisco, California 94111 

 Telephone: (415) 217-6810 

 Facsimile: (415) 217-6813 

 E-Mail: cadio@saveri.com

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 3:08-cv-00487-CRB Document 14 Filed 02/21/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 08 0487 SC, Stipulation Re Extension of Time For Defendant EVA Airways to Respond to Complaint 

and Proposed Order 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JUSTIN LABARGE, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS 

SIMILARLY SITUATED, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

AIR NEW ZEALAND, ALL NIPPON 

AIRWAYS, CATHAY PACIFIC 

AIRWAYS, CHINA AIRLINES, EVA 

AIRLINES, JAPAN AIRLINES 

INTERNATIONAL, MALAYSIA 

AIRLINES, NORTHWEST 

AIRLINES, QANTAS AIRWAYS, 

SINGAPORE AIR, THAI AIRWAYS, 

UNITED AIRLINES, 

 Defendants.

 Case No. C 08 00487 SC 

The Honorable Samuel Conti 

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT 

TO LOCAL RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT AND 

CONTINUING COURT-ORDERED 

DEADLINES 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant’s time to 

answer, move, or otherwise plead is enlarged until the later of: (1) the date when Defendant would 

otherwise be required to a file a response pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12; or (2) 45 

days after the JPML grants, denies, or otherwise disposes of the pending motion. If a consolidated 

amended complaint is filed by Plaintiffs in a single transferee Court and served on Defendant, 

Defendant’s time to answer, move, or otherwise plead is enlarged until 45 days after such service. 

Dated: [__________] [__], 2008 

Honorable Samuel Conti 

Judge of the United States District Court 

2/21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:08-cv-00487-CRB Document 14 Filed 02/21/08 Page 4 of 4