Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03828/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03828-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

03740.51469/3421708.1 Case No. C 09-03828-RS (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP

 Michael E. Dergosits (SBN 118206) 

 Teddy K. Joe (SBN 242589) 

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 705-6377 

Facsimile: (415) 750-6383 

Email: mdergosits@dergnoah.com 

Email: tjoe@dergnoah.com 

GOLDSTEIN FAUCETT & PREBEG, LLP 

 Matthew J.M. Prebeg (pro hac vice) Edward W. Goldstein(pro hac vice) Holly H. Barnes (pro hac vice) 1177 West Loop South, Suite 400 

Houston, Texas 77027 

Telephone: (713) 877-1515 

Facsimile: (713) 877-1737 

Email: mprebeg@gfpiplaw.com 

Email egoldstein@gfpiplaw.com 

Email: hbarnes@gfpiplaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

YIELDBOOST TECH, INC. 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

 Claude M. Stern (SBN 96737) 

 Robert B. Wilson (pro hac vice)

 Jesse Geraci (SBN 259755) 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065

Main No.: (650) 801-5000 

Fax No.: (650) 801-5100 

Email: claudestern@quinnemanuel.com 

Email: robertwilson@quinnemanuel.com 

Email: jessegeraci@quinnemanuel.com 

Attorneys for Defendants

PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC. and 

ORBOTECH, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

YIELDBOOST TECH, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC. AND 

ORBOTECH, INC., 

 Defendants. 

No. C 09-03828 RS (PVT) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 

TO SHORTEN TIME TO HEARING ON 

YIELDBOOST’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL PRODUCTION OF 

DOCUMENTS 

Hearing: Mon, April 19, 2010

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Crtrm.: Crtrm. 5, 4th Floor

Judge: Hon. Patricia V. Trumbull

Case 5:09-cv-03828-RS Document 80 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

03740.51469/3421708.1 -1- Case No. No. C 09-03828-RS (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

WHEREAS, on March 22, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel Production of 

Documents (Dkt. No. 55), requesting that the Motion be heard on April 6, 2010;

WHEREAS, on March 22, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Shorten Time To Hear 

Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Dkt. No. 57), proposing that Defendants 

file their Opposition no later than Monday, March 29, 2010, that Plaintiff file a Reply no later than 

Friday, April 2, 2010, and that the Court will hear Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production of 

Documents on Tuesday, April 6, 2010, at 10:00 a.m.; 

WHEREAS, on March 25, 2010, Defendants filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to 

Shorten Time To Hear Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents (Dkt. No. 62) 

proposing that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents be heard and briefed on the 

normal schedule; 

WHEREAS, the Court has not ruled on Plaintiff’s Motion to Shorten Time To Hear Its 

Motion to Compel Production of Documents, the Defendants have not yet filed their Opposition, 

and Plaintiff has not yet filed a Reply; 

WHEREAS, the undersigned counsel, met, conferred and stipulated to the following 

briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents: 

Event Deadline 

Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to 

Compel Production of Documents April 6, 2010 

Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Its Motion to 

Compel Production of Documents April 12, 2010 

Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel 

Production of Documents April 19, 2010 

Case 5:09-cv-03828-RS Document 80 Filed 04/08/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

03740.51469/3421708.1 -2- Case No. No. C 09-03828-RS (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED, AGREED AND ORDERED that the date for 

filing Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents shall be 

April 6, 2010, the date for filing Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Production 

of Documents shall be April 12, 2010, and the hearing on said matter is April 19, 2010 at 10:00 

a.m. 

Dated: April 6, 2010

By: /s/ Jesse Geraci

Jesse Geraci

 Attorneys for Defendants 

PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC. and 

ORBOTECH, INC.

Dated: April 6, 2010

By: /s/ Teddy K. Joe

 Teddy K. Joe

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

YIELDBOOST TECH, INC.

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Ted Joe. 

Dated: April 6, 2010

By: /s/ Jesse Geraci

Jesse Geraci

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: __April 7__, 2010 

 Hon. Patricia V. Trumbull 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 5:09-cv-03828-RS Document 80 Filed 04/08/10 Page 3 of 3