Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00453/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00453-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TAIT L. BELYEW, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR BROWN, et 

al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-453-MCE-EFB PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

This action, in which plaintiffs are proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 

undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On July 13, 2015, 

the court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint with leave to amend. The order explained the 

complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiffs thirty days to file an amended complaint correcting those 

deficiencies, and warned plaintiffs that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 9. 

 The deadline has passed and plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 

responded to the order. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-00453-MCE-EFB Document 11 Filed 09/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the 

Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: September 8, 2015. 

Case 2:15-cv-00453-MCE-EFB Document 11 Filed 09/09/15 Page 2 of 2