Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01406/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01406-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO SET 

HEARING DATE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GUATAY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP. 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 08 CV 1406 JM CAB 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AND TO SET HEARING DATE 

FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT 

Courtroom: 16 

Judge: Honorable Jeffrey T. Miller 

The parties have submitted a joint motion to continue the hearing on plaintiff 

Guatay Christian Fellowship’s motion for summary judgment and to set a hearing date 

for cross-motions for summary judgment 

Good cause appearing, the Court grants the joint motion. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

1. The July 10, 2009 hearing date on Guatay Christian Fellowship’s motion for summary 

judgment is vacated and reset pursuant to Paragraph 3, infra.

2. The County of San Diego will file its motion for summary judgment on or before July 10, 

2009.

3. The hearing on the cross-motions for summary judgment will be held on August 13, 2009 

at 3:30 p.m. 

Case 3:08-cv-01406-JM-BLM Document 53 Filed 05/22/09 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO SET 

HEARING DATE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. Under Rule 7.1(e)(2) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of California, the oppositions to the motions for summary judgment 

must be filed on or before July 30, 2009. 

5. Under Rule 7.1(e)(3) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of California, the replies in support of the motions for summary 

judgment must be filed on or before August 6, 2009. 

DATED: May 22, 2009 

 JEFFREY T. MILLER 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

JEFFREY T. MILLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUD

Case 3:08-cv-01406-JM-BLM Document 53 Filed 05/22/09 Page 2 of 2