Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01404/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01404-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HERNAN OROZCO,

Plaintiff,

v.

EDMUND G. BROWN, JR.,

Defendant.

No. 2:14-cv-1404 MCE CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed November 5, 2014, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and 

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Rather, he has filed a copy of a petition he recently 

filed in the Northern District of California requesting a writ of mandamus (ECF No. 13), similar 

to the request previously addressed by this court. (ECF Nos. 7, 11.) From the record it does not 

appear that plaintiff wishes to proceed with this individual civil rights action, but seeks relief in 

the Northern District as a purported third-party beneficiary in the Plata and/or Coleman class 

actions. (See ECF No. 13.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:14-cv-01404-MCE-CKD Document 14 Filed 12/16/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: December 16, 2014

2 / oroz1404.fta_fr

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-01404-MCE-CKD Document 14 Filed 12/16/14 Page 2 of 2