Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01510/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01510-77/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

QUESTIONS ON 

PENDING MOTIONS

By 5 P.M. TODAY, each party is requested to answer the following questions in three

double-spaced pages or less:

1. Was the fund represented in the registration statement to be diversified at all times

during the various class periods?

2. With respect to the September 2006 SAI regarding uninsured mortgage-backed

securities, would reasonable investors have understood it to mean, in light of the

total mix of representations made, that the fund was free to invest all of the fund in

uninsured mortgage-backed securities even if the underlying and ultimate source

of payment was a single industry?

3. Did any other part of the registration statement (or other marketing materials)

cross-reference to the uninsured mortgage-backed securities definition?

Dated: April 5, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 560 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 1