Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01273/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01273-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:504 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 07cv1273w

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ECHOSTAR SATELLITE, LLC, et

al.,

Plaintiff, 

CASE NO: 07-CV-1273 W (AJB)

ORDER GRANTING IN-PART

AND DENYING IN-PART

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION [DOC. NO. 18]

v.

VIEWTECH, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ ex parte application to strike the new

arguments raised in Defendants’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss the

complaint. Alternatively, Plaintiffs request leave to file a sur-reply in order to

respond to the new arguments. Defendants’ oppose the motion to strike, but

consent to Plaintiffs filing a sur-reply.

Having considered the papers submitted, and good cause appearing, the Court

DENIES the motion to strike, but GRANTS the request to file a sur-reply. [Doc.

No. 18.] The proposed sur-reply, attached to the Plaintiffs’ ex parte application as

Exhibit A, shall be filed within 5 court days of this order. There shall be no further

briefing. Additionally, in light of the foregoing, the hearing on Defendants’ motion

Case 3:07-cv-01273-BEN-WVG Document 20 Filed 10/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 07cv1273w

to dismiss is continued until November 19.2007. The matter will be decided on the

papers, and there shall be no oral argument. See Civil Local Rule 7.1(d.1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 30, 2007

Hon. Thomas J. Whelan

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-01273-BEN-WVG Document 20 Filed 10/30/07 Page 2 of 2