Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01431/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01431-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERESA CLEMENS, JORDEN

SIMENSEN, and ADRIA DESPRES,

individuals, for themselves and all

members of the putative class and on behalf

of aggrieved employees pursuant to the

Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”),

Plaintiffs,

 v.

HAIR CLUB FOR MEN, LLC, a Delaware

corporation, and DOES 1 through 100,

inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-01431 WHA

ORDER AMENDING

CLASS DEFINITION

Plaintiffs sought to certify a class that would include employees that worked for Hair

Club from the start of the class period “until final judgment.” Plaintiffs aver that the alleged

wage-statement violations are ongoing. To avoid the practical challenges presented by

certifying an open-ended class that would encompass any new hire on a rolling basis, the order

certifying the class set the cutoff for the class period as May 27, 2015, the date of the complaint. 

Plaintiffs requested to extend the class period to April 14, 2016, the date of the order certifying

the class. Hair Club stated that it does not oppose plaintiffs’ request. The proposed cutoff

period for the class is hereby extended to April 14, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-01431-WHA Document 70 Filed 04/28/16 Page 1 of 1