Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01177/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01177-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

13863495.1.LITIGATION STIPULATION 

CASE NO. C 10-01177 JW 

WAYNE S. KREGER (SBN 154759) 

SARA D. AVILA (SBN 263213) 

MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP 

2800 Donald Douglas Loop North 

Santa Monica, CA 90405 

Telephone: (310) 396-9600 

Facsimile: (310) 396-9635 

E-Mail: wkreger@maklawyers.com; 

savila@maklawyers.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Mary McKinney 

MATTHEW L. LARRABEE (SBN 97147) 

DECHERT LLP 

One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2300 

San Francisco, California 94111-3513 

Telephone: 415.262.4500 

Facsimile: 415.262.4555 

STEVEN B.WEISBURD (SBN 171490) 

steven.weisburd@dechert.com 

DECHERT LLP 

300 West 6th Street 

Suite 2010 

Austin, TX 78701 

Telephone: 512.394.3000 

Facsimile: 512.394.3001 

Attorneys for Defendant, Google Inc. 

HENRY WEISSMANN (SBN 132418) 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 

Telephone: (213) 683-9100 

Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 

E-mail: Henry.Weissmann@mto.com 

ROSEMARIE T. RING (SBN 220769) 

SARALA V. NAGALA (SBN 258712) 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 

Telephone: (415) 512-4000 

Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 

E-Mail: Rose.Ring@mto.com; 

Sarala.Nagala@mto.com 

Attorneys for Defendant, HTC Corp. 

JOSEPH E. ADDIEGO III (SBN 169522) 

JAMES C. GRANT (Pro Hac Vice) 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, CA 94111-6533 

Telephone: (415) 276-6500 

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 

E-Mail: joeaddiego@dwt.com; 

jamesgrant@dwt.com

Attorneys for Defendant, T-Mobile USA, Inc. 

[Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MARY McKINNEY, et al., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

HTC CORP., a Taiwanese corporation, and 

T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 10-01177 JW 

STIPULATED REQUEST AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE 

DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO OPPOSE 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL 

ARBITRATION AND MOTIONS TO 

DISMISS AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

REPLY THERETO 

Case 5:10-cv-01177-EJD Document 45 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 STIPULATION 

CASE NO. C 10-01177 JW 13863495.

WHEREAS, the following four (4) motions are currently pending in the above entitled 

action (1) T-Mobile USA, Inc’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case; (2) HTC 

Corp.’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case; (3) T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s Motion to 

Dismiss; and (4) HTC Corp. and Google Inc.’s joint Motion to Dismiss. 

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Plaintiff to oppose the Motions is August 11, 2010; 

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Defendants to reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to the 

Motions is August 25, 2010; 

WHEREAS, given that the hearing date for the Motions is scheduled for November 1, 

2010, and the current deadlines are based upon a modified briefing scheduled stipulated to by the 

parties, the parties to this action have agreed at Plaintiff’s request, subject to the Court’s approval, 

that the deadline for Plaintiff to oppose the Motions should be continued to August 25, 2010 and 

the deadline for Defendants to reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motions should be continued 

to September 22, 2010; 

NOW THEREFORE, plaintiff and defendants through their counsel of record, respectfully 

stipulate as follows: 

1. The current due date of August 11, 2010 for Plaintiff to oppose the Motions shall 

be vacated, and the new deadline set for August 25, 2010. 

2. The current due date of August 25, 2010 for Defendants to reply to Plaintiff’s 

opposition to the Motions shall be vacated, and the new deadline set for September 

22, 2010. 

Case 5:10-cv-01177-EJD Document 45 Filed 08/17/10 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C 10-01177 JW 13863495.

DATED: August 9, 2010 MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP 

By: /s/ Wayne S. Kreger 

WAYNE S. KREGER 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MARY MCKINNEY 

DATED: August 9, 2010 DECHERT LLP 

By: /s/ Matthew L. Larrabee 

MATTHEW L. LARRABEE 

Attorneys for Defendant 

GOOGLE INC. 

 

DATED: August 9, 2010 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

By: /s/ Rosemarie T. Ring 

ROSEMARIE T. RING 

Attorneys for Defendant 

HTC CORPORATION 

DATED: August 9, 2010 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

By: /s/ James Grant 

JAMES GRANT 

Attorneys for Defendant 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. 

Additional Counsel: 

JOE R. WHATLEY, JR. 

EDITH M. KALLAS 

PATRICK J. SHEEHAN 

WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS, LLC 

1540 Broadway, 37th Floor 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 447-7070 

Facsimile: (212) 447-7077 

HOWARD RUBINSTEIN 

LAW OFFICE OF HOWARD RUBINSTEIN 

914 Waters Avenue, Suite 20 

Aspen, CO 81611 

Telephone: (832) 715-2788 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 5:10-cv-01177-EJD Document 45 Filed 08/17/10 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C 10-01177 JW 13863495.

E-Mail: jwhatley@wdklaw.com; 

ekallas@wdklaw.com; psheehan@wdklaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Mary McKinney 

Mary McKinney 

BRIAN W. SMITH 

SMITH & VANTURE, LLP 

1615 Forum Place, Suite 4C 

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

Telephone: (800) 443-4529 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Mary McKinney 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

1. The current due date of August 11, 2010 for Plaintiff to oppose the Motions shall 

be vacated, and the new deadline set for August 25, 2010. 

2. The current due date of August 25, 2010 for Defendants to reply to Plaintiff’s 

opposition to the Motions shall be vacated, and the new deadline set for September 

22, 2010. 

Dated: ______________________ ___________________________________ 

 United States District Judge

August 17, 2010 

Case 5:10-cv-01177-EJD Document 45 Filed 08/17/10 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C 10-01177 JW 13863495.

CERTIFICATION

I, Sara Avila , am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE 

FOR PLAINTIFF TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 

AND MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY THERETO. In 

compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Wayne S. Kreger, Matthew L. 

Larrabee, Rosemarie T. Ring, and Jim Grant concurred in this filing. 

Case 5:10-cv-01177-EJD Document 45 Filed 08/17/10 Page 5 of 5