Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_12-cv-08255/USCOURTS-azd-3_12-cv-08255-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1443(1) Rent, Lease &amp; Ejectment

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Marley Foglesong, et al., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 12-08255-PCT-FJM

ORDER

Before the court is plaintiff's motion to remand (doc. 7). Defendant did not respond

to the motion and the time for doing so has long since expired. See LRCiv 7.2(c).

Defendant's failure to respond to the motion may be deemed a consent to the granting of the

motion and we may dispose of the motion summarily. LRCiv 7.2(i).

On December 10, 2012, plaintiff filed an action for forcible entry and detainer in

the Yavapai County Superior Court pursuant to A.R.S. 12-1171. Defendant removed the

action to this court on December 17, 2012. Plaintiff argues that there is no basis to

remove the action to federal court because it arises solely under state law. Defendant has

the burden of establishing that removal was proper. Hunter v. Philip Morris USA, 582

F.3d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir. 2009). Defendant has failed to meet his burden.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING plaintiff's motion to remand this

action to Yavapai County Superior Court (doc. 7).

DATED this 19th day of February, 2013.

Case 3:12-cv-08255-FJM Document 8 Filed 02/20/13 Page 1 of 1