Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06504/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06504-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AARON BROWN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

COMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP

and SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT 501, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-06504 JSW

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

On February 13, 2008 defendant Community Housing Partnership (“CHP”) filed a

motion to dismiss and noticed it to be heard on April 11, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. The Court

HEREBY ORDERS that plaintiff Aaron Brown’s (“Plaintiff”) opposition to this motion shall be

due by Friday, March 14, 2008 and CHP’s reply shall be due by Friday, March 21, 2008.

On February 7, 2008, the Court denied Plaintiff’s ex parte motion for preliminary

injunction because it was not served and noticed in accordance with the local rules and because

the motion was incomprehensible. A day later, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Re-filing

Preliminary Injunction (TRO). Plaintiff has not yet noticed this motion for a hearing date at

least thirty-five days after service of the motion in violation of Civil Local Rule 7-2(a). 

Nevertheless, the Court HEREBY SETS Plaintiff’s motion to be heard on April 11, 2008 at

9:00 a.m. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that Defendants’ opposition to this motion shall be

due by Friday, March 14, 2008 and Plaintiff’s reply shall be due by Friday, March 21, 2008.

Case 3:07-cv-06504-JSW Document 31 Filed 02/20/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If the Court determines that these matters are suitable for resolution without oral

argument, it will so advise the parties in advance of the hearing date. If the parties wish to

modify this schedule, they may submit for the Court’s consideration a stipulation and proposed

order demonstrating good cause for any modification requested. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 20, 2008 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-06504-JSW Document 31 Filed 02/20/08 Page 2 of 2