Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-02905/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-02905-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

BRAULIO RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SUMMIT MORTGAGE REALTY, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

JUAN MEDINA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

ARGENT MORTGAGE COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C05-02904 HRL

No. C05-02905 HRL

INTERIM ORDER RE SUMMIT

DEFENDANTS’ JUNE 15, 2007 REQUEST

TO EXTEND STAY

On June 15, 2007, defendants Summit Mortgage Realty, Esperanza Valverde, Herman

Covarrubias and Cesar Valverde (aka Cesar Ponte) (the “Summit Defendants”) filed a “Status

Report on Related Criminal Proceedings” in which they request an extension of the stay of the

above-captioned lawsuits. There apparently is no objection to the requested extension in

Rodriguez v. Summit Mortgage Realty, Inc., et al. (C05-02904 HRL). However, the plaintiffs in

Medina, et al. v. Argent Mortgage Company, et al. (C05-02905 HRL) oppose any further

extension of the stay. The Summit Defendants advise that they wish to file a reply brief before

*E-FILED: 6/26/2007*

Case 5:05-cv-02905-HRL Document 141 Filed 06/26/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the court issues a ruling. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Summit Defendants’ reply shall be filed no later than June 29, 2007.

2. The stay of these civil proceedings will be extended briefly until the court rules

on the Summit Defendants’ request for an extended stay.

3. The court is inclined to deem the matter submitted without oral argument. 

However, if, upon review of the parties’ papers, the court determines that a hearing is necessary,

it will so notify the parties.

Dated:

 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

June 26, 2007

Case 5:05-cv-02905-HRL Document 141 Filed 06/26/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:05-cv-2904 Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

Phillip M. Adleson padleson@ahk-law.com, tclark@ahk-law.com 

Nancy M. Battel nancy@battelaw.com, battelaw@aol.com 

Hsiao C. Mao mmao@ahk-law.com, dvajretti@ahk-law.com 

James L. Stoelker jstoelker@mount.com, sretes@mount.com 

Glenn H. Wechsler glenn@glennwechsler.com

5:05-cv-2905 Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

Phillip M. Adleson padleson@ahk-law.com, tclark@ahk-law.com 

Kerstin Arusha kerstina@lawfoundation.org 

Karen A. Braje kbraje@reedsmith.com 

Peter N. Brewer pbrewer@brewerfirm.com, julia@brewerfirm.com 

Moses Diaz mosesd@lawfoundation.org, moses@ucdavis-alumni.com 

Matthew Greinert greinertm@howrey.com, kasenenkop@howrey.com 

Kyra Ann Kazantzis kyrak@lawfoundation.org 

Courtney Lynn Landis clandis@morganlewis.com, cgreenblatt@morganlewis.com 

David Alan Makman makmand@howrey.com, kasenenkop@howrey.com 

Hsiao C. Mao mmao@ahk-law.com, dvajretti@ahk-law.com 

Jami Wintz McKeon jmckeon@morganlewis.com, cgreenblatt@morganlewis.com 

Jack R. Nelson cahunt@reedsmith.com, jnelson@reedsmith.com 

Paul E. Rice price@rutan.com, smoody@civlit.com 

James F. Zahradka , II jamesz@lawfoundation.org, teresam@lawfoundation.org

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have

not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Case 5:05-cv-02905-HRL Document 141 Filed 06/26/07 Page 3 of 3