Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02857/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02857-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:206 Collect Unpaid Wages

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C06-02857CW

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Time to Answer or Respond and Continue CMC 

234413.1 

Timothy M. Freudenberger, State Bar No. 138257 

Maria O. Gutierrez, State Bar No. 209995 

CARLTON DiSANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 

2600 Michelson Drive 

Suite 800 

Irvine, California 92612 

Telephone: (949) 622-1661 

Facsimile: (949) 622-1669 

E-Mail: tfreud@cdflaborlaw.com 

mgutierrez@cdflaborlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JACK IN THE BOX INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BEVERLY GINTZ, individually, and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JACK IN THE BOX, INC., and DOES 1 through 

25, inclusive, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C06-02857CW 

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME 

FOR JACK IN THE BOX INC. TO 

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND 

TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, TO 

CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AND 

TO COMPLETE MEET AND CONFER 

AND INITIAL DISCLOSURES PRIOR 

TO CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Action Filed: April 27, 2006 

Case 4:06-cv-02857-CW Document 10 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 Case No. C06-02857CW

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Time to Answer or Respond and Continue CMC 

234413.1 

CARLTON DiSANTE & 

FREUDENBERGER LLP 

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Beverly Gintz’s ("Plaintiff's") Complaint in this action was served on 

June 9, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to extend by sixty (60) days the time for 

Defendant Jack in the Box Inc. ("JIB") to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the 

instant case; 

WHEREAS, JIB's deadline to answer or otherwise respond is currently August 28, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference in this case is currently set for 1:30 

p.m. on September 8, 2006; 

WHEREAS, September 1, 2006 is currently the last date for the parties to complete initial 

disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) report, file Case Management Statement, and file Rule 

26(f) Report; 

WHEREAS, August 18, 2006 is currently the last date for the parties to meet and confer re 

initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan; file ADR 

Certification signed by Parties and Counsel; and file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of 

need for ADR Phone Conference; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and her counsel also have a putative class action pending against JIB 

in Orange County Superior Court (Gintz v. Jack in the Box et al, Case No. Case No. 04CC00204, 

filed April 21, 2004); 

WHEREAS, at the time the parties stipulated to extend JIB's time to answer or otherwise 

respond to the Complaint in the instant case, JIB had a motion for summary judgment in Orange 

County Superior Court case set for hearing on August 11, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the hearing date for the Orange County Superior Court motion has been 

moved to September 15, 2006; 

WHEREAS, a motion by Plaintiff and a case management conference in the Orange County 

Superior Court case are likewise set for September 15, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the outcome of the hearings in the Orange County Superior Court case may 

impact the above listed deadlines which are scheduled to occur prior to September 15, 2006 in the 

Case 4:06-cv-02857-CW Document 10 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 Case No. C06-02857CW

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Time to Answer or Respond and Continue CMC 

234413.1 

CARLTON DiSANTE & 

FREUDENBERGER LLP 

instant case; 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to continue the dates for the meet and confer regarding initial 

disclosures, the parties' Rule 26(f) report, JIB's responsive pleading, and the initial case 

management conference such that these matters can take into account rulings in the Superior Court 

case on September 15, 2006; and 

WHEREAS, the parties stipulate to request that this Court continue the dates in the instant 

case pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2 as set forth below: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND THEIR 

COUNSEL OF RECORD THAT: 

(1) the last date for the parties to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, 

ADR process selection, and discovery plan; file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel; 

and file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of need for ADR Phone Conference be 

continued to and including September 22, 2006; 

(2) Defendant Jack in the Box Inc.'s time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Gintz’s 

Complaint in the instant case be extended to and including September 25, 2006; 

(3) The last date for the parties to complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 

26(f) report, file Case Management Statement, and file Rule 26(f) Report be continued to October 

6, 2006; and 

(4) The Initial Case Management Conference in this case be continued to 1:30 p.m. on 

October 13, 2006.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: August 3, 2006 CARLTON DiSANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 

Timothy M. Freudenberger 

Maria O. Gutierrez 

By: 

Timothy M. Freudenberger 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JACK IN THE BOX INC. 

Case 4:06-cv-02857-CW Document 10 Filed 08/10/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4 Case No. C06-02857CW

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Time to Answer or Respond and Continue CMC 

234413.1 

CARLTON DiSANTE & 

FREUDENBERGER LLP 

Dated: August 3, 2006 SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC 

By: 

Clyde H. Charlton 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BEVERLY D. GINTZ 

 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

(1) the last date for the parties to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, 

ADR process selection, and discovery plan; file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel; 

and file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of need for ADR Phone Conference be 

continued to and including September 22, 2006; 

(2) Defendant Jack in the Box Inc.'s time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Gintz’s 

Complaint in the instant case be extended to and including September 25, 2006; 

(3) The last date for the parties to complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 

26(f) report, file Case Management Statement, and file Rule 26(f) Report be continued to October 

6, 2006; and 

(4) The Initial Case Management Conference in this case be continued to 1:30 p.m. on 

October 20, 2006. 

8/10/06 /s/ CLAUDIA WILKEN 

Dated: ________________ 

The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

Judge of the United States District Court for 

the Northern District of California 

Case 4:06-cv-02857-CW Document 10 Filed 08/10/06 Page 4 of 4