Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02042/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02042-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE SPITTAL,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-05-2042 FDC GGH PS

vs.

APEL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

The undersigned has reviewed plaintiff’s several filings in opposition to entry of a

vexatious litigant order. The filings further prove the point of the March 24, 2006 order to show

cause why a vexatious litigant order should not be entered. Plaintiff continues his diatribe

concerning how all judges and lawyers and parties in his various cases have lied, slandered and

worse. Plaintiff demonstrates that he is very likely to continue being a vexatious litigant as

defined in the March 24 order.

ACCORDINGLY, after consideration of plaintiff’s opposition filings and

defendants’ response thereto, the court orders as follows:

1. With the exception of one document clearly entitled “Request for

Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Order,” and until further order of the court issues, the

Clerk shall accept no further filings from plaintiff in this case unless and until he posts a

Case 2:05-cv-02042-FCD-GGH Document 37 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

vexatious litigant bond in the amount of $10,000.00;

2. All presently pending motions, requests etc. are stricken;

3. If plaintiff does not post the required bond within thirty days of today’s date,

and no intervening order is issued, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed

with prejudice and a further pre-filing vexatious litigant order be entered;

4. Should plaintiff timely file the bond, further orders will issue concerning

prosecution of the case;

5. Continued attempted filings in violation of this order may subject plaintiff to

contempt of court penalties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 4/12/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:gh:035

spittal2042.vex

Case 2:05-cv-02042-FCD-GGH Document 37 Filed 04/13/06 Page 2 of 2