Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00293/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00293-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD F. MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:11-cv-00293-LJO-DLB PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW FILED 

MOTION AND DENYING MOTION FOR 

CLERK OF THE COURT TO COPY AND 

SERVE MOTIONS

ECF Nos. 28, 29, 30

Plaintiff Ronald F. Martinez (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against 1) 

Defendants Vasquez, T. Wan, C. Moreno, R. Tolsen, B. Peterson, Clark, Allison, R. Diaz, S. 

Sherman, and Does 1 through 10 for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment 

for deprivation of exercise and 2) Vasquez, Moreno, Tolsen, Peterson, Clark, Allison, Diaz, 

Sherman, A. Hernandez, Gomez, and Does 1 through 10 for violation of the Equal Protection Clause 

of the Fourteenth Amendment.

On October 18, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Clerk of the Court make 

copies of Plaintiff’s motions and serve Defendants, and a motion to compel responses from 

Defendants. ECF Nos. 28, 29. On October 22, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw the motion 

to compel. ECF No. 30. Plaintiff again requests that the October 22, 2012 motion be copied and 

that Plaintiff receive a copy of the motion.

Case 1:11-cv-00293-LJO-DLB Document 33 Filed 11/27/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his motion will be granted. Plaintiff’s motion requesting 

copies is denied. The Court does not generally assist either party in the litigation of the action by 

making and serving copies of motions. See First Informational Order ¶ 3 (“The court cannot provide 

copies or mailing service for a party”), ECF No. 3.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his previously filed motion, filed October 22, 2012, is 

granted;

2. Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed October 18, 2012, is deemed withdrawn; and

3. Plaintiff’s motion for copies and service of motions, filed October 18, 2012, is 

denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 26, 2012 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

3b142a

Case 1:11-cv-00293-LJO-DLB Document 33 Filed 11/27/12 Page 2 of 2