Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00819/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00819-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

SARWAT “STEWART” FAHMY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-00819-MMC 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 14

Before the Court is defendants Sarwat “Stewart” Fahmy and Fahmy Law Group’s 

Motion to Dismiss, filed March 22, 2016, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Arch Insurance Company has filed opposition, to which 

defendants have replied. The matter came on regularly for hearing on today’s date. 

David A. Tartaglio of Musick, Peeler, & Garrett LLP appeared on behalf of plaintiff. Alan 

L. Martini of Sheuerman, Martini, Tabari, Zenere, & Garvin appeared on behalf of 

defendants. 

The Court having considered the parties’ respective written submissions and the 

arguments of counsel, and for the reasons stated by the Court on the record at the 

hearing, the Motion to Dismiss is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 6, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-00819-MMC Document 21 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 1