Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01163/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01163-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jody L. Factor (pro hac vice) 

Nicholas S. Lee (pro hac vice) 

FACTOR & LAKE, LTD. 

1327 W. Washington Blvd., Suite 5/H 

Chicago, IL 60607 

Telephone: 312.226.1818. 

Fax: 312.226.1919 

E-Mail: jfactor@factor-lake.com 

E-Mail: nlee@factor-lake.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs FieldTurf USA, Inc. and FieldTurf Tarkett Inc. 

Callie A. Bjurstrom, State Bar No. 137816 

Andrea M. Kimball, State Bar No. 196485 

LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & 

SCRIPPS LLP 

600 West Broadway, Suite 2600 

San Diego, California 92101-3372 

Telephone: (619) 236-1414 

Facsimile: (619) 232-8311 

Email: cbjurstrom@luce.com

akimball@luce.com 

Local Counsel for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants 

FieldTurf International, Inc. and FieldTurf Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FIELDTURF USA, INC., a Florida 

corporation; and FIELDTURF TARKETT 

INC., a Canadian company, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

TURF TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a California 

corporation, 

 Defendant. 

 CASE NO.: 07-cv-01163 

 Judge: Barry Ted Moskowitz 

 Magistrate Judge: Barbara L. Major 

 

PROPOSED 

 PROTECTIVE ORDER 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 1 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted. 

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated 

Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 

all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the 

limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as 

confidential. 

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 

employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff). 

 2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 

medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 

transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 

discovery in this matter. 

 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under standards 

developed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). 

 2.4 “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information and 

Items: any non public material that the Designating Party in good faith believes contains or reveals 

trade secrets or other proprietary or commercially sensitive information or know-how that derives 

its economic value from secrecy so that the disclosure of which to another Party or non-party 

would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 

 2.5 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 

from a Producing Party. 

 2.6 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or 

Discovery Material in this action. 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 2 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-3- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2.7 Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or items 

that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 

“CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 

 2.8 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated 

as “CONFIDENTIAL” or as “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 

 2.9 Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are 

retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 

 2.10 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. 

 2.11 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well as 

their support staffs). 

 2.12 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 

pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert 

witness or as a consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or 

of a competitor of a Party’s and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an 

employee of a Party or a competitor of a Party. This definition includes a professional jury or trial 

consultant retained in connection with this litigation. 

 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 

services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; 

organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and 

subcontractors. 

3. SCOPE

The protection conferred by this Stipulation cover not only Protected Material (as defined 

above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, 

summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or 

counsel to or in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material. 

This Protective Order shall apply to the Parties to this action, and also to any other person 

producing or disclosing “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY” information in this action who agrees or is ordered to be bound by this Protective Order. 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 3 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 3 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-4- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

If, in the course of this action, information is sought from a third-party which would require such 

person to disclose and/or produce “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY” information, such third-party may obtain the protections of this Protective Order 

by agreeing in writing to produce information pursuant to this Protective Order and to be bound by 

it. No further order of this Court shall be necessary to extend the protections of this Order to 

third-parties. 

4. DURATION

Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 

Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 

otherwise directs. 

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each 

Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take 

care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate 

standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of 

material, document, items, or oral or written communications that qualify - so that other portions 

of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are 

not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 

5.2 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. 

Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper 

purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose 

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties), expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 

If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items that it 

designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of 

protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is 

withdrawing the mistaken designation. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 4 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 4 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-5- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5.3 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this 

Order (e.g. section 5.3(b), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for 

protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 

produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 

 (a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of 

depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” on each page that 

contains Protected Material. 

 A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available 

for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated 

which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the 

designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL 

— ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it 

wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions 

thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, then, before producing the specified documents, 

the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL 

— ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) at the top of each page that contains Protected Material. If 

only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 

also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 

margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted (either 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). 

 (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, 

that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify within 30 days after 

receipt of the transcript the specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and 

to specify the level of protection being asserted (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL - 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately 

designated for protection within the 30 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated 

Protective Order. 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 5 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 5 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-6- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for 

any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the 

container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” 

or “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only portions of the information or 

item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected 

portions, specifying whether they qualify as “CONFIDENTIAL” or as “CONFIDENTIAL — 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 

5.4 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure 

to designate qualified information or items as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL — 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to 

secure protection under this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” after the material was 

initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation, must make 

reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this 

Order. No liability shall attach for the Receiving Party’s disclosure of inadvertently or 

unintentionally disclosed “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY” Material from the time of receipt of that material until such time as the Producing Party 

properly designates it as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY”. 

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

6.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s 

confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary 

economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive 

its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly 

after the original designation is disclosed. 

 6.2 Meet and Confer. A party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating 

Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by 

conferring directly with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 6 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 6 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-7- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must 

give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the 

circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen 

designation. A challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it 

has engaged in this meet and confer process first. 

 6.3 Judicial Intervention. A Designating Party that seeks to enforce or maintain 

the same a confidential designation, but cannot resolve the designation issue through a meet and 

confer process as described in the preceding paragraph may file and serve a motion that identifies 

the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for wanting to maintain as confidential. 

Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the movant 

has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that 

sets forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the 

Designating Party in the meet and confer dialogue. 

 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the 

Designating Party. Until the Court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the 

material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s 

designation. 

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 

disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for 

prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be 

disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When 

the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 

12, below (FINAL DISPOSITION). 

 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 

location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under 

this Order. 

/ / / 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 7 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 7 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-8- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise 

ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may 

disclose any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to: 

 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as 

employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this 

litigation; 

 (b) the officers, directors, and employees of the Receiving Party to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (c) experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (d) the Court and its personnel; 

 (e) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure 

is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” 

(Exhibit A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal 

Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to 

anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order. 

 (g) the author of the document or the original source of the information. 

 7.3 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 

Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the 

Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated 

“CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 8 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 8 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-9- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as 

employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this 

litigation; 

 (b) Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably 

necessary for this litigation, and (2) who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective 

Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (c) the Court and its personnel; 

 (d) court reporters, their staffs, and Professional Vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and 

 (e) the author of the document or the original source of the information. 

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN 

OTHER LITIGATION

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that 

would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the Receiving 

Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by e-mail or fax, confirmed by mail, is 

acceptable) immediately and in no event more than five court days after receiving the subpoena or 

order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order. The Receiving Party 

also must immediately inform in writing the Party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in 

the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of 

this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must deliver a copy of this Stipulated 

Protective Order promptly to the Party in the other action that caused the subpoena or order to 

issue. 

The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of 

this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to 

protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The 

Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking protection in that court of its 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 9 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 9 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-10- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

confidential material - and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or 

encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 

9. NON-PARTY MATERIAL IN POSSESSION OF THE PARTIES

In the event that information in the possession or control of a Party involves the 

confidentiality rights of a non-party or its disclosure would violate a Protective Order issued in 

another action, the Party with possession or control of the information will attempt to obtain the 

consent of the non-party to disclose the information under this Protective Order. If the consent of 

the non-party cannot be obtained, the Party in possession of the non-party material will notify the 

Party seeking discovery of: (a) the existence of the information without producing such 

information; and (b) the identity of the non-party (provided, however, that such disclosure of the 

identity of the non-party does not violate any confidentiality obligations). The Party seeking 

discovery may then make further application to the non-party or seek other means to obtain such 

information. 

10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated 

Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party 

of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected 

Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the 

terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and 

Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

11. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL

Subject to public policy and further Court Order, nothing shall be filed under seal, and the 

Court shall not be required to take any further action with regard to material a party has designated 

as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” without separate 

prior Court Order made after application by either Party. Upon receiving Court Order to file under 

seal, any and all portions which incorporate and/or disclose Protected Materials shall be filed by 

placing such separately filed Protected Material in sealed envelopes endorsed as follows: (a) 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 10 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 10 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-11- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

endorsed with the words “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY”; and (b) endorsed with the following statement: 

This envelope contains confidential information 

and is not to be opened by anyone other than 

authorized Court personnel except by Court order 

or pursuant to written stipulation. 

The envelope shall make reference to this Protective Order and the date of its entry, and 

shall include the name, address and telephone number of the person filing the Protected Material. 

In addition, a copy of this Protective Order shall be included in the envelope. This Order is made 

without prejudice to either party seeking a further Order concerning any document or information 

felt to be entitled to a greater degree of protection. 

12. FINAL DISPOSITION

Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within sixty days 

after the final termination of this action, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to 

the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, 

abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of the 

Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating Party, the Receiving Party 

may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether the Protected 

Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the 

Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty day 

deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was 

returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, 

abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected 

Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all 

pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, 

even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or 

constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 

(DURATION), above. 

/ / / 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 11 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 11 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-12- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

13. MISCELLANEOUS

13.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 

person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 

13.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 

Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or 

producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective 

Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of 

the material covered by this Protective Order. 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

s/Jody L. Factor 

Jody L. Factor, Esq. 

Nicholas S. Lee, Esq. 

FACTOR & LAKE, LTD 

1327 W. Washington Blvd., Suite 5G/H 

Chicago, IL 60607 

Telephone: (312) 226-1818 

Facsimile: (312) 226-1919 

Email: jfactor@factor-lake.com 

 nlee@factor-lake.com 

Callie A. Bjurstrom, State Bar No. 137816 

Andrea M. Kimball, State Bar No. 196485 

LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & 

SCRIPPS LLP 

600 West Broadway, Suite 2600 

San Diego, California 92101-3372 

Telephone: (619) 236-1414 

Facsimile: (619) 232-8311 

Email: cbjurstrom@luce.com

 akimball@luce.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs FieldTurf USA, Inc. 

and FieldTurf Tarkett Inc. 

Dated: August 30, 2007 

s/Matthew R. Miller 

Matthew R. Miller (SBN 194657) 

DREHER LAW FIRM 

Historic Louis Bank of Commerce Building 

835 Fifth Avenue, Suite 202 

San Diego, California 92101 

Telephone: (619) 230-8828 

Facsimile: (619) 687-0136 

Email: mattmiller32@yahoo.com 

Peter M. Polischuk (SBN 086634) 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

3755 Avocado Boulevard, #520 

La Mesa, California 91941-7301 

Telephone: (619) 660-6054 

Facsimile: (619) 660-2687 

Email: amadeus2@pacbell.net 

Attorneys for Defendants Sports Construction 

Group LLC and Paul Franks 

Dated: August 30, 2007 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 12 of 13 Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 12 of 13
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

07-cv-01163-BTM (BLM) 

-13- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________, 2007 ___________________________________ 

 Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz 

United States District Judge 

101033119.1 

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 10 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 13 of 13

Hon. Barbara L. Major 

United States Magistrate Judge 

August 30

Case 3:07-cv-01163-BTM-BLM Document 11 Filed 08/30/07 Page 13 of 13