Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00630/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00630-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL FREDRIC MORA,

Plaintiff, CV F 05 0630 OWW WMW P

vs. FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Pending before the court is

Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this action. 

Attached to Plaintiff’s motion is a new civil complaint. Plaintiff indicates that he

“would like to voluntarily withdraw from this complaint to submit a new complaint entitled

Michael Fredric Mora v. Law Offices of Wolff, Kinsler, and Sittig, et al.,” Plaintiff may

voluntarily dismiss this case without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(a)(1)(i), so long as a responsive pleading has not been filed. There has been no service of

process, and no responsive pleading has been filed.

Plaintiff is advised that he will incur a liability of $350 for the filing fee of the

new action. The court will direct the California Department of Corrections to collect and

forward to the court the filing fee. Should Plaintiff desire to proceed with this (2005) action, he

should file objections to the findings and recommendations. Should Plaintiff fail to file

Case 1:05-cv-00630-LJO -WMW Document 12 Filed 02/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections, the court will submit the recommendation of dismissal without prejudice to the

District Court, and will direct the Clerk of Court to file the complaint sent to the court on

February 1, 2007.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice on Plaintiff’s motion.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

thirty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 7, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00630-LJO -WMW Document 12 Filed 02/08/07 Page 2 of 2