Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00404/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00404-64/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

SERVICE EMPLOYEES,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

SEIU UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-00404 WHA (MEJ)

DISCOVERY ORDER RE: DKT. #454

On January 12, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a letter regarding certain outstanding discovery disputes

in this case. (Dkt. #454.) Upon review of Plaintiffs' letter, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

1) Defendant Dan Martin shall file a declaration, attesting under penalty of perjury, that (a) the

computer identified as his wife's in Plaintiffs' letter is exclusively used by her, and (b) he has

never used the computer for any purpose, including non-UHW-related business. Mr. Martin

shall file his declaration by January 19, 2010. If Mr. Martin files this declaration, the

computer need not be produced.

2) Alternatively, if Mr. Martin has used the computer for any purpose, including non-UHWrelated business, it shall be produced by January 19, 2010, under the terms of the existing

Protective Order and protocol about how to handle non-UHW property on Defendants'

electronic devices.

3) As to Defendants' counsel's declarations regarding Barbara Lewis and Joan Emslie,

Defendants' counsel have now filed declarations as previously ordered. Accordingly, this

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 458 Filed 01/13/10 Page 1 of 2
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

issue is moot.

4) As to the interrogatory responses of Michael Krivosh, Jorge Rodriguez, and NUHW,

Defendants shall serve their responses by January 21, 2010. Failure to serve responses may

result in the imposition of sanctions, including exclusion of any testimony from said

Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 458 Filed 01/13/10 Page 2 of 2