Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01537/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01537-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 08cv1537 BTM(RBB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOEL HARRINGTON,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 08cv1537 BTM(RBB)

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

MOTIONS TO DISMISS, MOTIONS

FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT,

AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE

vs.

CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC., et al.,

Defendants.

Previously, Duxford Financial, Inc. (“Duxford”) and Chase Home Finance LLC

(“Chase”) filed motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim, motions for a more definite

statement, and motions to strike. After the motions were filed, Plaintiff filed a First Amended

Complaint, which does not name Duxford as a defendant. Due to the filing of the First

Amended Complaint, the motions to dismiss, motions for a more definite statement, and

motions to strike, all of which address the original complaint, are DENIED AS MOOT. Of

course, this Order is without prejudice to Chase filing new motions in response to the First

Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 12, 2008

Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-01537-BTM-RBB Document 15 Filed 11/12/08 Page 1 of 1