Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-04956/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-04956-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- 3:11-cv-04956-RS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT APPENDIX 

OF EXHIBITS AND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE ISO THEIR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

SEDGWICK LLP 

Ralph A. Guirgis (State Bar. No. 143262) 

ralph.guirgis@sedgwicklaw.com 

Michael L. Fox (State Bar No. 173355) 

michael.fox@sedgwicklaw.com 

Jenni K. Katzer (State Bar No. 253684) 

jenni.katzer@sedgwicklaw.com 

333 Bush Street, 30th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104-2834 

Tel.: 415.781.7900 / Fax: 415.781.2635 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BRIT UW LIMITED 

(sued as “Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s 

Under Policy No. B0146LDUSA701030”) 

LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE 

DONALDSON 

George Donaldson (State Bar No. 77971) 

info@logdlaw.com 

2298 Durant Avenue 

Berkeley, CA 94707 

Tel.: 510.548.7474 / Fax: 510.548.7488 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

WILLIAM AMBROSIO, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WILLIAM AMBROSIO, an individual; et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S 

UNDER POLICY NO. B0146LDUSA0701030 

and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:11-cv-04956-RS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR 

THE PARTIES JOINT APPENDIX OF 

EXHIBITS AND REQUEST FOR 

JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF 

THEIR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs William Ambrosio, et al. (collectively, “Ambrosio Plaintiffs” or “Plaintiffs”) 

and Defendant Brit UW Limited (“Brit” or “Defendant”) (sued as “Certain Underwriters at 

Lloyd’s Under Policy No. B0146LDUSA701030”), by their attorneys of record, AGREE AND 

STATE AS FOLLOWS: 

Case 3:11-cv-04956-RS Document 83 Filed 12/10/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- 3:11-cv-04956-RS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT APPENDIX 

OF EXHIBITS AND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE ISO THEIR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

A. Both the Plaintiffs and Defendant intended to file cross-motions for summary 

judgment on December 10, 2015, the last day for filing dispositive motions; 

B. Plaintiffs and Defendant anticipated having to file extensive documents in 

support of their cross-motions and, for the Court’s benefit, have agreed to coordinate their 

exhibits; and 

C. Plaintiffs and Defendants have collaborated on a Joint Appendix of Exhibits 

and a Joint Request for Judicial Notice but, at the last minute, disagreed on the extent to 

which the exhibits can be/need to be highlighted. 

After discussion with the Court’s legal research attorney, Plaintiffs and Defendants 

have agreed and STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Defendant will provide electronic copies of its highlighted exhibits to 

Plaintiffs immediately after the Court’s execution of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order, 

after which Plaintiffs will add their marks and annotations to the exhibits; 

2. If Plaintiffs provide Defendants their annotations before the end of the day on 

Monday, December 14, 2015, then Defendants will file the Joint Appendix of Exhibits and 

Request for Judicial Notice on Tuesday, December 15, 2015; 

3. If Plaintiffs have not provided Defendants with their annotations before the 

end of the day on Monday, December 14, 2015, then Plaintiffs will file the Joint Appendix of 

Exhibits and Request for Judicial Notice on Tuesday, December 15, 2015; and 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:11-cv-04956-RS Document 83 Filed 12/10/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3- 3:11-cv-04956-RS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR THE PARTIES' JOINT APPENDIX 

OF EXHIBITS AND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE ISO THEIR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

4. The filing of the Joint Appendix of Exhibits and Request for Judicial Notice 

shall be deemed timely and shall not prejudice the parties’ cross-motions for summary 

judgment. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: December 10, 2015 SEDGWICK LLP 

By: /s/ Michael L. Fox 

Michael L. Fox 

Jenni K. Katzer 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BRIT UW LIMITED (sued as “Certain Underwriters 

at Lloyd’s Under Policy No. B0146LDUSA0701030”) 

DATED: December 10, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE DONALDSON 

By: /s/ George Donaldson 

George Donaldson 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

WILLIAM AMBROSIO, et al. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

HON. RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

ATTESTATION 

I, Michael L. Fox, am the ECF user whose User ID and Password are being used to file 

the STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE 

PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. In compliance with General 

Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained 

from signatory George Donaldson. 

Dated: December 10, 2015 SEDGWICK LLP 

 BY: /s/ Michael L. Fox 

 Michael L. Fox 

12/10/15

Case 3:11-cv-04956-RS Document 83 Filed 12/10/15 Page 3 of 3