Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02266/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02266-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT W. SMITH,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2266 DFL PAN P

vs.

GLENN DOUGLAS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed April 11, 2006, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has expired and plaintiff

has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 20 days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-02266-JKS-EFB Document 11 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right

to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 31, 2006.

/mp/004

smit2266.fta

Case 2:05-cv-02266-JKS-EFB Document 11 Filed 06/01/06 Page 2 of 2