Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05314/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05314-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE TWITTER, INC. SECURITIES 

LITIGATION

Case No. 16-cv-05314-JST 

ORDER RESETTING HEARING ON 

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM 

NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER 

OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: ECF Nos. 270, 271, 277

Plaintiffs have filed a motion for relief from a non-dispositive pretrial order issued by 

Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(A), and Civil Local Rule 72-2. ECF No. 270. 

The Court set the motion for hearing on May 23, 2019, with a response due by April 26, 

2019, and any reply due by May 3, 2019. ECF No. 271. The parties have filed a stipulated 

request to change the hearing date to May 16, 2019 due to availability of defense counsel. ECF 

No. 277. The request is granted. The motion hearing is hereby reset for May 16, 2019 at 2:00 

P.M. Defendants are ordered to file a response of no longer than 5 pages, not counting 

declarations or exhibits, by April 26, 2019. Plaintiffs may file an optional reply of no longer than 

3 pages by May 3, 2019. 

Additionally, the parties, as well as non-party Gabriel Stricker, are hereby ordered to show 

cause by no later than April 30, 2019 as to why Stricker should not be ordered to file on the public 

record the declaration that was submitted to Judge Kim for in camera review pursuant to her order 

at ECF No. 264. See ECF No. 266 at 1 (referencing this declaration in the order Plaintiffs now 

challenge). If no party or third party objects to the public filing of that declaration, Stricker is 

ordered to file the declaration by May 2, 2019. However, if any party does assert that the 

Case 3:16-cv-05314-JST Document 279 Filed 04/24/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

declaration should not be filed publicly, the Court will take the matter under submission. The 

Court is unlikely to read the declaration as part of deciding the motion for relief if the declaration 

has not been filed publicly. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 24, 2019

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-05314-JST Document 279 Filed 04/24/19 Page 2 of 2