Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-00489/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-00489-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PATRICK BRADY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SCOTT JONES, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:21-cv-0489 TLN AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without an attorney, has filed a motion for a 30-day 

extension to file an opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 62. 

 Defendants filed their motion for summary judgment on November 25, 2024. ECF No. 

61. According to plaintiff’s declaration, he did not receive defendants’ motion until December 2, 

2024. ECF No. 62 at 4. A week later, on December 9, he was told to pack up his property 

because he was on a transfer list. Id. This was confirmed the following day. Id. at 5. On 

December 11, 2024, plaintiff inquired about the timeline for the return of his property. Id. He 

was informed it could take one to two weeks after the transfer to get his property back. Id. at 7. 

Plaintiff is also concerned about delays that occur due to wait times to sign up for and get called 

to go to the law library after transfer. Id. at 2. 

 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff’s motion for a 30-day extension of time (ECF No. 62) is granted; and 

Case 2:21-cv-00489-TLN-AC Document 63 Filed 12/27/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

2. Plaintiff has until January 15, 2025, to file an opposition to defendants’ motion for 

summary judgment. 

DATED: December 27, 2024 

Case 2:21-cv-00489-TLN-AC Document 63 Filed 12/27/24 Page 2 of 2