Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00788/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00788-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THRESSA BRADSHAW,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0788 DAD

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER

Defendant.

 /

On April 5, 2010, the Clerk of the Court issued this court’s scheduling order

together with an Order re Consent or Request for Reassignment. The orders were accompanied

by a form titled “Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment,” by which a party may

either consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes or request

reassignment of the case to a United States District Judge. Pursuant to Appendix A(j) of the

Local Rules, and as directed in the order re consent or request for reassignment, each party is

required to execute a copy of the form and return it to the Clerk of the Court within ninety days

after the court’s order is issued.

Defendant filed the required form on May 17, 2010. The ninety-day period for

filing the form has now expired, and plaintiff has not submitted an executed form.

/////

Case 2:10-cv-00788-FCD-DAD Document 11 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff shall, within seven days after this

order is filed, file an executed “Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment” form, or

show good cause for failing to do so.

DATED: July 9, 2010.

DAD:kw

bradshaw0788.osc.form

Case 2:10-cv-00788-FCD-DAD Document 11 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 2