Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-01675/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-01675-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

Case No.:3:13-CV-01675-SC

 ________________________ 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STEVE W. BERMAN (pro hac vice)

steve@hbsslaw.com 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Telephone: (206) 623-7292 

Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 

LEE M. GORDON (SBN 174168) 

lee@hbsslaw.com

ELAINE T. BYSZEWSKI (SBN 222304) 

elaine@hbsslaw.com

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

301 North Lake Avenue, Suite 203 

Pasadena, CA 91101 

Telephone: (213) 330-7150 

Facsimile: (213) 330-7152 

 -andUREKA E. IDSTROM (pro hac vice)

uidstrom@eurekalawfirm.com

THE EUREKA LAW FIRM 

5606 Belinder Road 

Fairway, KS 66205 

Telephone: (816) 665-3515 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

KYM PARDINI and CARRIE WOOD, on 

behalf of themselves and all others similarly 

situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. 3:13-CV-01675-SC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER MODIFYING CLASS 

CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE 

Case 4:13-cv-01675-JSW Document 53 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING 

CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE 

3:13-CV-01675-SC 

010360.12 687847v1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -1-

WHEREAS, on August 18, 2014, Plaintiffs propounded their first set of requests for 

production of documents to Defendant Unilever United States, Inc.;

WHEREAS, on September 3, 2014 this Court entered an Order setting a briefing schedule 

for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification; 

WHEREAS, Defendant has worked diligently to identify, collect, and review materials in 

response to Plaintiffs’ production requests; 

WHEREAS, despite Defendant’s ongoing efforts, Defendant has not yet commenced its 

production of documents; 

WHEREAS, Defendant anticipates commencing its production on a rolling basis in January 

2015, subject to entry of a mutually agreeable protective order; 

WHEREAS, absent modification of the current certification briefing schedule, Plaintiffs’ 

Motion for Class Certification would be due in February 2015; 

WHEREAS, counsel for the respective parties have conferred regarding the certification 

briefing schedule in this case; 

WHEREAS, the parties recognize that Plaintiffs need a reasonable opportunity to review 

Defendant’s production of documents prior to taking Defendant’s deposition and in advance of 

filing a certification motion; 

WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the Parties agree that good cause exists to extend the 

briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification by approximately ninety (90) days; 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, through 

their counsel, and subject to court approval, to the following proposed schedule for the Motion for 

Class Certification: 

Event Proposed Due Date 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification May 13, 2015 

Defendant’s Response July 14, 2015 

Case 4:13-cv-01675-JSW Document 53 Filed 01/05/15 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING 

CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE 

3:13-CV-01675-SC 

010360.12 687847v1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -2-

Plaintiffs’ Reply September 11, 2015 

Hearing on Class Certification October 13, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. [or at 

the Court’s discretion on 

___________, 2015 at ______]

DATED: December 22, 2014 LEE M. GORDON 

ELAINE T. BYSZEWSKI 

STEVE W. BERMAN 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

UREKA E. IDSTROM 

THE EUREKA LAW FIRM 

By: /s/ Lee M. Gordon 

LEE M. GORDON 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 

DATED: December 22, 2014 WILLIAM L. STERN 

CLAUDIA M. VETESI 

LISA WONGCHENKO 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By: /s/ William L. Stern 

WILLIAM L. STERN 

Attorneys for Defendant Unilever United States, Inc. 

ATTESTATION OF LEE M. GORDON 

 I, Lee M. Gordon, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file the 

following: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING CLASS 

CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE, and pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in 

the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 

 /s/ Lee M. Gordon 

LEE M. GORDON 

Case 4:13-cv-01675-JSW Document 53 Filed 01/05/15 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING 

CLASS CERTIFICATION SCHEDULE 

3:13-CV-01675-SC 

010360.12 687847v1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -3-

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class 

Certification shall be filed no later than May 13, 2015; Defendant’s Response shall be filed no later 

than July 14, 2015; Plaintiffs’ Reply shall be filed no later than September 11, 2015; and the 

hearing on Class Certification shall take place on ___________________, 2015 at ___________. 

DATED: _________________________ _____________________________________ 

 HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

October 23 10:00 a.m.

01/05/2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 4:13-cv-01675-JSW Document 53 Filed 01/05/15 Page 4 of 4