Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01549/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01549-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 448
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Education
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

___________________________________________________________________________________________

JOINT STIP. RE: EXTENSION TO MEET & SCUSD v. R.H. et al. 

CONFER; & ORDER Case No.2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DAD 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LOZANO SMITH

One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050

Sloan R. Simmons, SBN 233752

ssimmons@lozanosmith.com

Sarah L. Garcia, State Bar No. 233814

sgarcia@lozanosmith.com

LOZANO SMITH

One Capitol Mall, Suite 640

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 329-7433

Facsimile: (916) 329-9050

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim 

Defendant SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED 

SCHOOL DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

K.H., J.H., and R.H.

Defendant.

Case No. 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DAD

JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION 

TO MEET AND CONFER AND RETURN 

RESPONSE TO COURT ON PROPOSED 

JUDGMENT; AND ORDER

R.H., by and through her Guardians ad litem, J.H 

and K.H. and K.H., Individually,

,

Counterclaimants,

vs.

SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT

Counterclaim Defendant.

Case 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DB Document 42 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 4
JOINT STIP. RE: EXTENSION TO MEET & SCUSD v. R.H. et al.

CONFER; & ORDER Case No. 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DAD

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LOZANO SMITH

One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, by and between Plaintiff 

and Cross-Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District (“District”) and Defendants and CrossComplainants J.H. and K.H., and as guardian ad litem for R.H. (“Defendants” and collectively with the 

District, the “parties”), through their counsel of record, through its counsel of record, as follows:

1. On October 7, 2016, the Court issued its Opinion regarding the parties’ cross-motions for 

summary judgment (“Opinion”); 

2. On December 13, 2016, Defendants filed a Proposed Judgment pertaining to claims 

arising under the Individuals with Disabilities Educations Improvement Act (“IDEA”), as adjudicated by 

the Court’s Opinion; 

3. On December 20, 2016, Plaintiff filed an opposition and objections to the Proposed 

Judgment; 

4. On January 9, 2017, Defendants filed a reply to the District’s opposition and objections to 

the Proposed Order; 

5. On January 10, 2017, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer to discuss and 

attempt to resolve their differing views on the proposed judgment, including the calculation of any 

potential interest owed, and to file a Joint Proposed Judgment within fourteen (14) days of the Court’s 

subject order; 

6. On Friday, January 20, 2017, counsel for the parties participated in a telephone 

conversation to meet and confer about the proposed judgment, in accordance with the Court’s Order. In 

addition to the proposed judgment, counsel discussed the possibility of settlement of this action in full, 

and agreed that it is in the best interest of the parties’ ability to successfully meet and confer regarding 

same, to extend the time to submit to the Court a joint proposed judgment or a joint statement explaining 

the parties’ positions as to a proposed judgment, to February 15, 2017; 

7. This is the first request for modification to the Court’s January 10, 2017 order; and 

///

///

///

Case 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DB Document 42 Filed 01/25/17 Page 2 of 4
JOINT STIP. RE: EXTENSION TO MEET & SCUSD v. R.H. et al.

CONFER; & ORDER Case No. 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DAD

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LOZANO SMITH

One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050

8. Based on the foregoing, the parties request the Court’s approval to extend the time to 

submit to the Court a joint proposed judgment or a joint statement explaining the parties’ positions as to 

a proposed judgment, to February 15, 2017. 

Dated: January 24, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

LOZANO SMITH

/s/ Sloan R. Simmons 

SLOAN R. SIMMONS

SARAH L. GARCIA

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant

SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Dated: January 24, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

RUDERMAN & KNOX, LLP 

/s/ Colleen A. Snyder

F. RICHARD RUDERMAN

COLLEEN A. SNYDER

Attorney for Defendants and Cross-Complainants

R.H., by and through her Guardians ad litem, J.H and K.H. 

and K.H.,

Case 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DB Document 42 Filed 01/25/17 Page 3 of 4
JOINT STIP. RE: EXTENSION TO MEET & SCUSD v. R.H. et al.

CONFER; & ORDER Case No. 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DAD

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LOZANO SMITH

One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation between Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Sacramento City 

Unified School District (“District”) and Defendants and Cross-Complainants J.H. and K.H., and as 

guardian ad litem for R.H. (“Defendants”), and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, THE 

COURT HEREBY ORDERS the deadline for the parties to submit to the Court a joint proposed 

judgment or a joint statement explaining their positions as to a proposed judgment, is extended to 

February 15, 2017. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 24, 2017

Case 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DB Document 42 Filed 01/25/17 Page 4 of 4