Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01991/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01991-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Leonard C. Herr, #081896

Ron Statler, #234177

HERR PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP

Attorneys at Law

100 Willow Plaza, Suite 300

Visalia, California 93291

Telephone: (559) 636-0200

Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF VISALIA, ADAM COLLINS, 

DANIEL ROBERTS and DIRK ALFANO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REYNALDA MOLINA, individually; 

JACQUELINE MENDEZ-MADUEÑA, 

individually; G.M., a minor; J.M., a 

minor; and N.A.C., a minor, and each 

of them, by and through their 

Guardian Ad Litem VERONICA AYON; 

and NICHOLAS CHAVEZ, individually,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

CITY OF VISALIA, a Municipal 

Corporation; ADAM COLLINS; DANIEL 

ROBERTS; DIRK ALFANO, individually 

and in their official capacity, and 

DOES 4 through 100, inclusive,

 Defendants.

Case No.: 1:13-cv-01991-DAD-SAB

ORDER RE STIPULATION 

ADMITTING REQUEST FOR 

ADMISSIONS AND WITHDRAWAL 

OF MOTION TO COMPEL 

(ECF Nos. 79, 80, 83)

The parties, including all Plaintiffs and named Defendants, by and through 

counsel, agree to the terms and conditions of this stipulation and jointly request 

that the Court enter it as its order at the end of this document.

///

///

///

Case 1:13-cv-01991-DAD-SAB Document 84 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 3
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 I.

RECITALS

Whereas, on February 3, 2016, plaintiffs’ counsel and defendants’ counsel 

met in a further effort to resolve defendants’ pending motion to compel answers to 

requests for admissions [Doc. 79]; 

Whereas, plaintiffs’ attorney offered to resolve the pending motion to compel 

by admitting, without objection or qualification requests for admissions 23-25 

[and, in the case of Reynalda Molina, 27-29];

Whereas, defendants’ counsel is willing to accept these unqualified 

admissions, as a resolution of this motion [Doc. 79]; and,

Whereas, legal counsel for all of the parties believe it is in the best interests 

for all concerned, including the administration of justice, that this motion [Doc. 79] 

be resolved through stipulation rather than further litigation.

II.

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this litigation 

through their respective attorneys of record that defendants’ motion [Doc. 79] shall 

be resolved by plaintiffs admitting, without qualification or objection, requests for 

admissions numbered 23-25 [and, in the case of Reynalda Molina, 27-29] for all 

purposes, including trial in this case, in the manner prescribed by the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure.

Respectfully submitted.

Dated: February 4, 2016 CHEONG DENOVE ROWELL & BENNETT

By: /s/ Jesse E. French (authorized on 2/4/16)

JESSE E. FRENCH

PETER I. BERSIN

CHARLES P. CHARLTON

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs,

 REYNALDA MOLINA, JACQUELINE 

MENDEZ-MADEUÑA, G.M., a minor, J.M., 

a minor and N.A.C., a minor

Case 1:13-cv-01991-DAD-SAB Document 84 Filed 02/04/16 Page 2 of 3
-3-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: February 4, 2016 HERR PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP

By: /s/ Leonard C. Herr

 LEONARD C. HERR

Attorney for DEFENDANTS,

CITY OF VISALIA, ADAM COLLINS, 

DANIEL ROBERTS and DIRK ALFANO

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the motion to compel filed 

January 19, 2016 is withdrawn. The hearing set for February 17, 2016 at 10:00 

a.m. in Courtroom 9 is HEREBY VACATED and the Clerk’s Office is directed to 

terminate the motion (ECF Nos. 79, 80.) 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01991-DAD-SAB Document 84 Filed 02/04/16 Page 3 of 3