Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00798/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00798-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOOP AI LABS INC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANNA GATTI, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY 

LETTER

Re: Dkt. No. 274

On September 24, 2015, the court denied Defendant Gatti’s motion for a protective order 

as to five subpoenas issued by Plaintiff. The court suspended operation of the subpoenas pending 

resolution of the parties’ dispute and ordered the parties to comply with the court’s procedure for 

resolution of discovery disputes. [Docket No. 212.] On October 16, 2015, the court denied the 

“joint letter” filed by Plaintiff and Defendant Gatti regarding the subpoenas (Docket No. 241) on 

the grounds that the parties had failed to comply with the court’s Standing Order by meeting and 

conferring about their disputes. 

The court has now received Plaintiff’s October 19, 2015 letter seeking clarification 

regarding the operability of five subpoenas to which Defendant Gatti objected. The court’s 

September 24, 2015 order remains in place. The parties must meet and confer in good faith in 

accordance with the court’s Standing Order and submit a joint letter regarding any remaining 

disputes. The five subpoenas remain suspended pending resolution of the parties’ disputes. 

However, the order suspending compliance with the subpoenas applies only to those portions of 

the subpoenas to which Defendant Gatti objected. The recipients of the subpoenas shall promptly 

Case 4:15-cv-00798-HSG Document 277 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

respond to the non-objectionable portions of the subpoenas.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 21, 2015

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:15-cv-00798-HSG Document 277 Filed 10/21/15 Page 2 of 2