Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01010/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01010-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26:6502 IRS:Enforcement of tax liens

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DR MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 05-1010 MMC (MEJ)

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' UPDATED

PRIVILEGE LOGS

The Court is in receipt of the parties' Joint Letter Regarding Plaintiffs' Updated Privilege

Logs. (Doc. #45). In the request, Defendant argues that Plaintiffs have improperly redacted certain

attorney invoices. Plaintiffs respond that they only redacted the narrative description of the

invoices. The Court finds that such redaction is permissible. Accordingly, Plaintiffs shall serve on

Defendant a declaration attesting that only the narrative description of the invoices were redacted,

and that such redaction is in compliance with the restrictions of Clarke v. American Commerce Nat'l

Bank, 974 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1993). If Defendant still contends that the redactions were improper,

the parties shall jointly choose a special master for the purpose of reviewing the invoices in camera,

with any expenses to be equally shared by the parties. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 9, 2007 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01010-MMC Document 57 Filed 10/09/07 Page 1 of 1