Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01434/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01434-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES E. SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v.

BOARD OF PRISON TERM

PERSONNEL, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01434-LJO-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SET ASIDE

JUDGMENT, WITH PREJUDICE

(Doc. 26)

ORDER THAT NO FURTHER MOTIONS TO

SET ASIDE JUDGMENT WILL BE

CONSIDERED, AND ANY SUCH MOTIONS

FILED WILL BE STRICKEN FROM THE

RECORD

Plaintiff James E. Smith (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner who was proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil action. On August 16, 2007, the Court dismissed this action, with

prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and failure to obey a court

order. Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to set aside the judgment on September 17, 2007, and his

motion was denied by the Court on September 21, 2007. On October 15, 2007, plaintiff filed a

second motion to set aside judgment, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and (6).

Plaintiff’s second motion suffers from the same deficiency as his first motion in that it is not

supported by any coherent argument that he is entitled to relief from judgment pursuant to Rule

60(b)(4) or (b)(6). The Court can discern no good faith basis for the filing of the motion, and it is

HEREBY ORDERED DENIED, with prejudice. 

///

///

Case 1:06-cv-01434-LJO -LJO Document 27 Filed 10/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

It is FURTHER ORDERED that no further motions to set aside or amend the judgment will

be considered by the Court, and any such motions filed will be stricken from the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 18, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01434-LJO -LJO Document 27 Filed 10/18/07 Page 2 of 2