Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-02062/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-02062-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Equal Employment O p p ort unit y

Commission, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Go Daddy Software, Inc., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 04-2062-PHX-DGC

ORDER

The Court held a discovery conference call with the parties on November 1, 2005.

The Court ordered that the confidentiality order to be entered in this case may provide that

Mr. Bouamama does not have access to private information concerning witnesses in the

case or confidential financial information about Go Daddy. The Court also ruled that the

confidentiality order may p rovide that court reporter must sign an agreement to be bound

by the confidentiality order. If t he p arties find they have difficulty arranging for court

reporters under this provision, they should place a conference call t o t he Court with the

court reporter on the line. 

The Court also directed the parties to engage in further discussions concerning the

disclosure of contact information regarding employees. The Court concluded that the

Case 2:04-cv-02062-DGC Document 63 Filed 11/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

 parties had not sufficiently discussed this issue to permit precise identification of and

ruling on issues in dispute.

DATED this 2nd day of November, 2005.

Case 2:04-cv-02062-DGC Document 63 Filed 11/02/05 Page 2 of 2