Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00080/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00080-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY BUFORD, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFFS )

DEPARTMENT, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

)

___________________________________ )

CV F 06-0080 REC WMW HC

ORDER DISMISSING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT FOR

RESPONDENTS 

[Doc. 4, 6]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On March 9, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. 

These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty

days. On April 12, 2006, Petitioner filed a request for voluntary dismissal of this case.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has

Case 1:06-cv-00080-REC-WMW Document 7 Filed 04/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708

F.2d 452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the th

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

March 9, 2006, are a adopted in full;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner’s

right to file a civil rights action raising these same claims; and 

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this

case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 17, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00080-REC-WMW Document 7 Filed 04/17/06 Page 2 of 2