Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03758/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03758-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARLING INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,

Plaintiff,

v.

BAYWOOD PARTNERS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-05-3758 EMC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION

OF DOCUMENTS

(Docket No. 96)

Defendants’ motion came on for hearing on September 15, 2006. Having considered the

papers filed in support of an in opposition to the motion and the argument of counsel, and good

cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. For the reasons stated on the

record, the Court orders Plaintiff to produce the following documents:

1. All documents Plaintiff agreed to produce in its August 28, 2006 letter;

2. All documents relating to the four loans it obtained during the 1997-2005 time period

(i.e., from BankBoston, Credit Lyonnaise, GE Capital, and JP Morgan Chase Bank) that reference

the Property, including any reports, notes, memos, correspondence, e-mails and other

communications; and

3. All documents that comprise financial and accounting records during the 1997-2005

time period that reference the Property, including any documents that reflect the value of the

Property, its treatment for tax purposes, the back-up data for the FAS 144 reports, and any

communications with Darling’s accountants and auditors that reference the Property.

Case 3:05-cv-03758-EMC Document 113 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

As to category No. 3, Plaintiff need not produce documents which do not contain any

substantive comments or characterization of the status of the Property.

Plaintiff shall by October 6, 2006 complete its production of all responsive documents and

provide a declaration to the Court and counsel certifying that all responsive documents have been

produced or identified in a privilege log.

This order disposes of Docket No. 96.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2006

 EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03758-EMC Document 113 Filed 09/15/06 Page 2 of 2