Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00390/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00390-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 362
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Tort Claim

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

cal kmw 

1

 “Full authority to settle” means that the individuals at the settlement conference be authorized

to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the

parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648 (7th Cir. 1989). The person

1 07cv0390

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCELO LONZON, MARC G. LONZON;

MARVIN G. LONZON, AND MARLON G.

LONZON,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 07cv390 WQH(AJB)

ORDER SETTING EARLY NEUTRAL

EVALUATION CONFERENCE;

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND BRIEFING

REQUIREMENTS

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Early Neutral Evaluation of the above entitled action will be

held on August 8, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of Judge Anthony J. Battaglia, U.S. Courts

Building, 940 Front St., Room 1145, San Diego, California.

Mandatory Appearance Requirements

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1.c of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the

Southern District of California, all counsel and each party, in addition to any other person(s) who

has full and unlimited authority1 to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement must appear in

Case 3:07-cv-00390-WQH-AJB Document 7 Filed 07/02/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman

v. Brinker Int.’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person with

unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference includes that the persons view of the case may be

altered during the face to face conference. Pitman at 486. A limited or a sum certain of authority is not

adequate. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590 (8th Cir. 2001).

2 07cv0390

person at the conference and must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages.

Governmental entities may appear through litigation counsel only. As to all other parties,

appearance by litigation counsel only is not acceptable. The parties must be prepared to present

demands and offers of settlement. The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to

this order to appear in person will result in the immediate imposition of sanctions. Sanctions will

include, but will not be limited to, the attorneys' fees and travel costs of the other parties in the case. In

addition, the conference will not proceed and will be reset to another date.

In cases where a party is incarcerated at the time of the scheduled conference, arrangements

will be made for the incarcerated party to appear telephonically.

Preparing for the ENE 

Plaintiff's counsel must give notice of the Early Neutral Evaluation conference to all defendants

making an appearance after the date of this notice.

All conference discussions will be informal, off the record, privileged and confidential. 

In preparation for the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, plaintiff(s) must submit a settlement

brief to chambers, through their counsel where applicable, by e-mail to

efile_battaglia@casd.uscourts.gov AND serve it on all other counsel and any unrepresented parties by

July 25, 2007.

Plaintiff(s) brief must include the following: 

1. A brief description of the case and the claims asserted;

2. A specific and current demand for settlement addressing all relief or remedies sought. If

a specific demand for settlement cannot be made at the time the brief is submitted, then

the reasons therefor must be stated along with a statement as to when the plaintiff(s) will

be in a position to state a demand; and

Case 3:07-cv-00390-WQH-AJB Document 7 Filed 07/02/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3 07cv0390

3. A brief description of any previous settlement negotiations, mediation sessions or

mediation efforts.

Defendant(s) must submit a settlement brief to chambers, through counsel where applicable, by

e-mail to efile_battaglia@casd.uscourts.gov and serve it on all other counsel and any unrepresented

parties by August 1, 2007. 

Defendant(s) brief must include the following:

1. A brief description of the defendant(s) position concerning plaintiff(s) allegations, any

defenses and any counter-claims or set-offs asserted;

2. A specific and current response to plaintiff(s) demand and the defendant(s) specific offer

of settlement; and,

3. A brief description of any previous settlement negotiations, mediation sessions or

mediation efforts.

General statements that a party will "negotiate in good faith" is not a specific demand or offer

contemplated by this Order. It is assumed that all parties will negotiate in good faith.

The briefs are limited to five (5) pages and must not include exhibits, attachments, or incorporate

by reference the pleadings on file or other material.

Request for Continuance or to Vacate ENE date

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, a request to continue the ENE will not be considered

unless submitted via a joint motion to continue the date no less than fourteen days prior to the

scheduled conference.

Any request to continue the conference or request for relief from any of the provisions or

requirements of this Order must be sought by a written ex parte application. The application must be

supported by a declaration of counsel setting forth the reasons and justifications for the relief requested;

confirm compliance with Civil Local Rule 26.1; and, report the position of opposing counsel or any

unrepresented parties subject to the Order. 

If the case is settled in its entirety before the scheduled date of the conference, counsel and any

unrepresented parties must still appear in person, unless a joint motion to vacate a conference date due

Case 3:07-cv-00390-WQH-AJB Document 7 Filed 07/02/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 K:\COMMON\BATTAGLI\CASES\Lonzon\notice ene_7 2 2007.wpd 4 07cv0390

to the complete settlement of the case is submitted no less than 24 hours before the scheduled conference.

Future Proceedings

In the event the case does not settle at the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, and where the

parties have not yet held the Rule 26(f) conference or made initial disclosures, the parties shall also be

prepared to discuss the following matters at the conclusion of the conference:

1. Any anticipated objections under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(E) to the

initial disclosure provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A-D);

2. The scheduling of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference;

3. The date of initial disclosure and the date for lodging the discovery plan following the

Rule 26(f) conference; and,

4. The scheduling of a Case Management Conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 16(b).

The Court will issue an appropriate order addressing these issues and setting dates as appropriate. Questions regarding this case may be directed to the Judge's chambers at (619) 557-3446.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 2, 2007

Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia

U.S. Magistrate Judge

United States District Court

Case 3:07-cv-00390-WQH-AJB Document 7 Filed 07/02/07 Page 4 of 4