Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00523/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00523-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C06-00523 HRL 1

KARL J. KRAMER (CA SBN 136433)

ROBERT L. McKAGUE (CA SBN 187461)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018

Telephone: (650) 813-5600

Facsimile: (650) 494-0792

kkramer@mofo.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SYNAPTICS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SYNAPTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

AVERATEC, INC, a California corporation; and 

PROSTAR COMPUTER, INC., a California 

corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-00523 HRL

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Case 5:06-cv-00523-HRL Document 6 Filed 03/08/2006 Page 1 of 4

*E-filed 3/16/06*

Case 5:06-cv-00523-HRL Document 13 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C06-00523 HRL 2

Plaintiff Synaptics, Inc. (“Synaptics”) is the owner of United States Patent Nos. 5,543,591 

(“the ’591 patent”), 5,880,411 (“the ’411 patent”), 5,943,052 (“the ’052 patent”), and 6,380,931 

(“the ’931 patent”). On January 27, 2006, Synaptics sued Averatec, Inc. (“Averatec”) for 

infringement of the ’591, ’411, ’052, and ’931 patents. 

WHEREAS, Synaptics and Averatec (collectively “the Parties”) have resolved and have 

agreed upon a private damages settlement;

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties consent to the entry of the following Order: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1. Except as set forth herein, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as against 

Averatec. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees associated with litigation of this 

matter prior to the entry of this Order. 2. For the life of the ’591, ’411, ’052, and ’931 patents, Averatec is enjoined from 

using in the United States, making in the United States, having made in the United States, selling 

in the United States, offering for sale in the United States, or importing into the United States for 

sale, the touch-pad systems accused of infringement in this action furnished directly or indirectly 

by Elantech Devices Corporation, or its affiliates or related companies, or any touch-pad systems 

that infringe claims of the ’591, ’411, ’052, and ’931 patents. Nothing in this Order precludes 

Averatec from purchasing and/or reselling touch-pad systems that are licensed by Synaptics. 

3. This Court has and retains jurisdiction over the parties to this action and the 

subject matter of this litigation, and any action to enforce or modify this Order. 4. In any suit to enforce the terms of this Order, the party seeking enforcement shall 

be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs if that party demonstrates that there was a 

violation of the terms of this Order.

Case 5:06-cv-00523-HRL Document 6 Filed 03/08/2006 Page 2 of 4
 Case 5:06-cv-00523-HRL Document 13 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C06-00523 HRL 3

Dated: March 8, 2006 KARL J. KRAMER

ROBERT L. McKAGUE

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: s/Karl J. Kramer

Karl J. Kramer

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SYNAPTICS, INC.

Dated: March 8, 2006 KAREN H. BROMBERG

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

By: s/Karen H. Bromberg

Karen H. Bromberg

Attorneys for Defendant

AVERATEC, INC.

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation of counsel and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

Honorable Howard R. Lloyd

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 5:06-cv-00523-HRL Document 6 Filed 03/08/2006 Page 3 of 4

3/16/06

Case 5:06-cv-00523-HRL Document 13 Filed 03/16/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C06-00523 HRL 4

I, KARL J. KRAMER, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that Karen H. Bromberg, Attorney for Defendant Averatec, Inc., has concurred in 

this filing.

Dated: March 8, 2006

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: s/Karl J. Kramer

Karl J. Kramer

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SYNAPTICS, INC.

Case 5:06-cv-00523-HRL Document 6 Filed 03/08/2006 Page 4 of 4
 Case 5:06-cv-00523-HRL Document 13 Filed 03/16/06 Page 4 of 4