Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-02209/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-02209-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

-1- 

JOINT INITIAL STIP. OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING [FRCP 6; L-R 144] 

Pomeroy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Case No. 1:09-cv-02209-LJO-GSA 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory L. Spallas, Esq. (SBN 129306) 

Kristin L. Oliveira, Esq. (SBN 204384) 

PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLP 

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 550 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Tel: (415) 278-9400 

Fax: (415) 278-9411 

gspallas@psalaw.net

koliveira@psalaw.net 

 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 

Daniel Rodriguez, Esq. (SBN 096625) 

Joel T. Andreesen, Esq. (SBN 152254) 

Charles Chapman, Esq. (SBN 115505) 

RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES 

2020 Eye Street 

Bakersfield, CA 93301 

Tel: (661) 588-2097 

Fax: (661) 323-0132 

jandreesen@rodriguezlaw.net

charles@rodriguezlaw.net

Attorneys for plaintiff 

Betty Pomeroy 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BETTY J. POMEROY, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Fed Case No. 1:09-cv-02209-LJO-GSA 

JOINT INITIAL STIPULATION OF 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

RESPONSIVE PLEADING [Fed. R. Civ. P. 

6; L-R 144]

TO THE COURT: 

Case 1:09-cv-02209-LJO-SKO Document 10 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

JOINT INITIAL STIP. OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING [FRCP 6; L-R 144] 

Pomeroy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Case No. 1:09-cv-02209-LJO-GSA 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Plaintiff BETTY POMEROY and Defendant WAL-MART STORES, INC. (Wal-Mart), 

by and through their attorneys of record, herein stipulate to an extension of time to January 19, 

2010 for Defendant Wal-Mart to file an answer to plaintiff’s Complaint. 

Good cause exists for this extension as Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. seeks an additional two 

court days to complete the preparation of its responsive pleading. 

 

Date: January 14, 2010 RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES 

 A Professional Law Corporation 

 By: /s/ Charles-Chapman as authorized on 1/14/10 __ 

 Charles Chapman 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 Betty J. Pomeroy 

Date: January 14, 2010 PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLP

 

 By: /s/ Kristin-L.-Oliveira 

 Gregory L. Spallas 

 Kristin L. Oliveira 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 WAL-MART STORES, INC. 

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. shall have until 

January 19, 2010 to file a responsive pleading to plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. 

Dated: January 15, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:09-cv-02209-LJO-SKO Document 10 Filed 01/15/10 Page 2 of 2