Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00735/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00735-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rodriguez v. County of Santa Clara – Case No. C 10-735 JW

STIPULATION RE SERVICE, TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND MEDIATION

John Burton, State Bar No. 86029

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURTON

65 North Raymond Avenue, Suite 300

Pasadena, California 91103

Telephone: (626) 449-8300

Facsimile: (626) 449-4417

E-Mail: jb@JohnBurtonLaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Francisco and Bellerminda Rodriguez, Individually and as

Successors in Interest of Edwin Rodriguez, Deceased

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCO and BELLERMINDA

RODRIGUEZ, Individually and as

Successors in Interest of EDWIN

RODRIGUEZ, Deceased,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,

SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL

CENTER, SANTA CLARA COUNTY

SHERIFF’S OFFICE, DEPUTY

SHERIFFS JENSEN #1756,

PALINOV #1864, CLARK #1676,

and FERNANDES #2013, CITY OF

CAMPBELL, CAMPBELL POLICE

DEPARTMENT, POLICE OFFICER

GARY BERG #63, and DOES 1 to

20,

Defendants. 

Case No. C 10-735 JW

STIPULATION RE SERVICE, TIME FOR

RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND

MEDIATION; ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Counsel for all parties have been in contact with one another since the filing of the

case and have informally exchanged information. All parties have either been served or

have agreed to waive service. 

Case 5:10-cv-00735-LHK Document 28 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rodriguez v. County of Santa Clara – Case No. C 10-735 JW

STIPULATION RE SERVICE, TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND MEDIATION

- 2 -

The parties have decided that an early mediation is appropriate in this case. A

mediation has been set for July 19, 2010 with Harris Weinberg, Esq., in San Francisco.

The parties have filed a stipulation to private ADR, with a proposed completion date of

July 20, 2010. The Court has entered an order thereon, and set a case management

conference on September 13, 2010, at 10:00 a.m.

Given the foregoing circumstances, the parties stipulate and agree, should the

Court deem it appropriate and convenient, that each defendant shall be deemed to have

been served or to have waived service. If the case resolves at the mediation, the parties

shall promptly notify the Court and request the setting of an appropriate date for

completion of the settlement and dismissal of the action. If the case does not resolve,

each defendant shall have until August 13, 2010 to file a response to the complaint.

Dated: June 23, 2010

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURTON

By: /S/ 

 John Burton

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MIGUEL MÁRQUEZ

Acting County Counsel

By: /S/ 

Aryn Paige Harris, Deputy County Counsel

Attorneys for Defendants County of Santa Clara,

Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, Santa Clara

County Sheriff’s Office, Deputy Sheriffs Jensen

#1765, Palinov #1864, Clark #1676, and 

Fernandes #2013

MANNING & MARDER

KASS, ELLROD, RAMIREZ LLP

By: /S/ 

Eugene P. Ramirez

Attorney for Defendants City of Campbell,

Campbell Police Department, and 

OPoRliDceE ORfficer Gary Berg #63

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________________ ________________________

 United States District Judge

June 29, 2010 

Case 5:10-cv-00735-LHK Document 28 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 2