Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00644/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00644-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORIO TEJADA, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CON-AGRA FOODS, INC., a business )

entity, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, )

)

Defendant. )

)

____________________________________)

CIV F 06-644 AWI DLB

ORDER STRIKING

PLAINTIFF’S JUNE 2, 2008,

FILINGS

(Doc. Nos. 43 & 44)

Currently pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. On

May 21, 2008, this Court vacated the June 2, 2008, 1:30 p.m. hearing on the motion. See Court’s

Docket Doc. No. 42. The order stated that Plaintiff had not timely filed an opposition, that a

review of the documents showed that oral argument was not necessary, and that the matter would

be taken under submission as of June 2, 2008. See id.

On June 2, 2008, at 2:50 p.m. and 2:52 p.m., Plaintiff filed an opposition to summary

judgment and a declaration. See Court’s Docket Doc. Nos. 43, 44. These documents are

untimely since the matter had already been taken under submission, and Plaintiff neither provides

an explanation for his untimely filing nor seeks permission to file late. Additionally, the

opposition fails to comply with the local rules because Plaintiff did not reproduce and respond to

Case 1:06-cv-00644-AWI-DLB Document 45 Filed 06/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendant’s proposed Undisputed Material Facts. See Local Rule 56-260(b). Because Plaintiff

provides no explanation for his untimely filings, and because he has failed to comply with the

local rules, the Court will not consider his opposition or declaration.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s late filed opposition and

declaration, Documents 43 and 44, are STRICKEN from the record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 3, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00644-AWI-DLB Document 45 Filed 06/04/08 Page 2 of 2