Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02229/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02229-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAGE 1

PETER J. ROSE, et al. v. CITY OF LODI, et al. USDC, Eastern District, Case No. CIV.S.05-2229 GEB/DAD

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS’ TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN

Mark E. Merin, SBN 043849

Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild, SBN 192086 

2001 P Street, Suite 100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: 916/443-6911

Facsimile: 916/447-8336

E-Mail: mark@markmerin.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

—o0o—

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

—o0o—

PETER ROSE; ASHLEY ROSE, a minor, by

and through her Guardian Ad Litem, her

custodial parent, Peter Rose; BRITNEY

ROSE, a minor, by and through her Guardian

Ad Litem, her custodial parent, Peter Rose;

and PETE ROSE Jr., a minor, by and through

his Guardian Ad Litem, his custodial parent,

Peter Rose,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF LODI CALIFORNIA; MATTHEW

FOSTER; ERNEST A. NIES, JR.; and,

DOES 1 THROUGH 25, 

Defendants.

CASE NO: CIV.S.05-2229 GEB/DAD

STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]

ORDER

COMPLAINT FILED: 11/03/06

TRIAL DATE: 02/12/08

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, that plaintiffs may amend

and file a First Amended Complaint (attached hereto as Exhibit A) to remove their previous Fourth

Cause of Action (due process violation of California Constitution, Art. I, Sec.).

DATED: April 6, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 

/s/ - “Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild”

BY: 

Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 2:05-cv-02229-GEB-EFB Document 28 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAGE 2

PETER J. ROSE, et al. v. CITY OF LODI, et al. USDC, Eastern District, Case No. CIV.S.05-2229 GEB/DAD

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR PLA- 2 - INTIFFS’ TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

DATED: April 5, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

D. STEPHEN SCHWABAUER

CITY ATTORNEY

CITY OF LODI

/s/ - “Janice D. Magdich”

BY: 

Janice D. Magdich

Deputy City Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant, City of Lodi, a California 

municipal Corporation

DATED: April 6, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF

/s/ - “Bruce A. Kilday”

BY: 

Bruce A. Kilday

Attorneys for Defendant, City of Lodi, a California 

municipal Corporation

DATED: April 5, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

SCOTT & NICHOLS

/s/ - “William S. Scott”

BY: 

William S. Scott

Attorneys for Defendants, Matthew Foster 

and Ernest A. Nies, Jr.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the First Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A to the

Stipulation to File First Amended Complaint, is deemed filed as of this date and that defendants have

20 days from this date in which to file a response to said First Amended Complaint. 

Dated: April 25, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02229-GEB-EFB Document 28 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAGE 3

PETER J. ROSE, et al. v. CITY OF LODI, et al. USDC, Eastern District, Case No. CIV.S.05-2229 GEB/DAD

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR PLA- 3 - INTIFFS’ TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:05-cv-02229-GEB-EFB Document 28 Filed 04/26/06 Page 3 of 3