Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_95-cv-00131/USCOURTS-caed-2_95-cv-00131-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY W. HOBSON, No. CIV.S-95-0131 LKK DAD PS

Plaintiff,

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

KENDAL CORNELL, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

As directed by prior order, defendants have filed with the

court and served a proper suggestion of death on the record

pertaining to the death of plaintiff that complies with the

requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a). Pursuant to

Rule 25, a motion for substitution of a proper party must be made no

later than ninety days after the death is suggested upon the record. 

That time period has now expired, and no motion for substitution has

been filed. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

dismissed. 

Case 2:95-cv-00131-LKK -DAD Document 131 Filed 08/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the

United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days after service

of these findings and recommendations, any written objections may be

filed with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections

to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to

file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 1, 2005.

DAD:th

ddad1\orders.prose\hobson0131.suggestionofdeath.f&r

Case 2:95-cv-00131-LKK -DAD Document 131 Filed 08/01/05 Page 2 of 2