Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02774/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02774-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. and Order Continuing Case Mgmt. Conf. – 

Case No. 07-CV-02774 JF (RS) 1

Robert A. Spanner, Esq. (State Bar No. 60308)

TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

545 Middlefield Road, Suite 220

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 324-2223

Facsimile: (650) 324-0178

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.,

Defendants. ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 07-CV-02774 JF (RS)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE 

TO THE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES, AND TO THE PARTIES’ ATTORNEYS

OF RECORD: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, IP

SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK

OF AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONS, INC. (“Defendants”) that the Case

Management Conference be continued for one month from its presently-scheduled date of

October 26, 2007, until after November 30, 2007, or to a later date that is convenient for

the Court. 

**E-filed 

10/3/07** --------------

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 22 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. and Order Continuing Case Mgmt. Conf. – 

Case No. 07-CV-02774 JF (RS) 2

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between

Plaintiff and Defendants that, pursuant to this Stipulation continuing the Case Management

Conference, the case schedule dates be modified as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto. 

Plaintiff and Defendants desire to pursue settlement opportunities in this matter and have

scheduled a mediation for October 22, 2007 utilizing the services of a JAMS mediator. 

This Stipulation is therefore requested for good cause, namely, for the purposes of

pursuing opportunities for settlement, and because Defendants’ counsel has a trial

scheduled to begin the week of November 26, 2007, and is not entered into for purposes of

delay. The parties previously stipulated that Defendants be granted an additional fifteen

(15) days in which to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to July 27, 2007. The parties

further stipulated that Defendants be granted an additional four (4) days in which to

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to July 31, 2007. In addition the parties stipulated that

the original case management conference be continued for two months, from its originallyscheduled date of August 29, 2007. The Court issued an Order granting that continuance

on August 27, 2007. 

By entering into this stipulation, neither Plaintiff nor Defendants waive any rights,

claims or defenses they may have in this action. This Stipulation may be executed in

counterparts and by facsimile signature, each of which, when executed, shall be an original

and all of which together shall constitute one and the same stipulation. This Stipulation

contains the entire agreement among the parties. The undersigned hereby consent to the 

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 22 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. and Order Continuing Case Mgmt. Conf. – 

Case No. 07-CV-02774 JF (RS) 3

terms set forth in the foregoing Stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 

Dated: ________________ TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.

By: _____________________________________

Robert A. Spanner

Dated: ________________ FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK OF 

AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONS,

INC.

By: _____________________________________

Christina D. Jordan

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from

Christina D. Jordan. 

Dated: ________________ TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.

By: _____________________________________

Robert A. Spanner

9/7/2007 /s/ Robert A. Spanner 9/27/2007 /s/ Christina Jordan 9/20/2007 /s/ Robert A. Spanner

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 22 Filed 10/03/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. and Order Continuing Case Mgmt. Conf. – 

Case No. 07-CV-02774 JF (RS) 4

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ __________________________________________

HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL JUDGE OF THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10/2/07

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 22 Filed 10/03/07 Page 4 of 4