Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-01292/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-01292-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO CARREON,

Plaintiff,

v.

S. ABDUR-RAHMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:17-cv-1292 TLN KJN

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 31, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 44.) Plaintiff 

filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 45.) Defendants did not file a 

reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

Case 2:17-cv-01292-TLN-KJN Document 46 Filed 03/09/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 31, 2019 (ECF No. 44), are

ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against defendant Lee based on her role in the

2015 RAP are DISMISSED based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust such claims; in all other 

respects, the motion on exhaustion grounds (ECF No. 39) is DENIED;

3. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 39) on Plaintiff’s remaining

Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant Dr. Lee, and all of Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 

claims against Defendant Dr. Abdur-Rahman are GRANTED; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 6, 2020 

Case 2:17-cv-01292-TLN-KJN Document 46 Filed 03/09/20 Page 2 of 2