Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00225/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00225-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Wilbur Atcherley (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action is currently in the 

discovery phase.

On June 23, 2014, Plaintiff submitted a Second Amended Complaint. Because he did not have 

leave to file an amended complaint, the document was lodged on the docket. 

At this stage of the proceedings, where Defendants have answered and the action is in 

discovery, Plaintiff needs either Defendants’ consent, or leave of Court to file an amendment. Fed. R. 

Civ. Proc. 15(a)(2). Plaintiff has not obtained either, and the Court therefore ORDERS the lodged 

WILBUR ATCHERLEY,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12cv00225 LJO DLB (PC)

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S 

LODGED SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

(Document 87)

Case 1:12-cv-00225-LJO-DLB Document 89 Filed 06/27/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Second Amended Complaint STRICKEN from the docket.1 Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR Mfg., Inc., 

627 F.3d 402, 404-05 (9th Cir. 2010) (Courts have the inherent power to control their docket and in 

the exercise of that power, they may properly strike documents).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2014 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

1

In the proof of service, Plaintiff entitles the document a Proposed Second Amended Complaint. However, Plaintiff has 

not filed a motion to amend.

Case 1:12-cv-00225-LJO-DLB Document 89 Filed 06/27/14 Page 2 of 2