Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00696/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00696-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff/Respondent, 

vs.

Gilberto Villalba-Perino,

Defendant/Movant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 08-1063-PHX-EHC

No. CV 09-0696-PHX-EHC (MHB)

ORDER

On April 3, 2009, Movant filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The United States has filed a Response. The matter was referred

to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns who filed a Report and Recommendation on January

11, 2010 recommending that the Motion be denied (Dkt. 10 - CIV 09-0696). 

 The district court reviews de novo the portions of the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation to which there is a filed objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)("a judge of

the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report, ..., to which

objection is made."); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.

2003). The district court is not required to review any issue that is not the subject of an

objection. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Ariz. 2003), citing Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

Case 2:09-cv-00696-EHC Document 11 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Movant has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. The Report

and Recommendation will be adopted as the Order of the Court.

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt.

10 - CIV 09-0696-PHX-EHC (MHB)) is adopted in full, including the denial of a Certificate

of Appealability. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct

Sentence is denied.

DATED this 8th day of March, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-00696-EHC Document 11 Filed 03/09/10 Page 2 of 2