Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00349/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00349-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SPENCER PETERSON, CASE NO. CV F 06-0349 LJO SMS

Plaintiff, ORDER TO DENY REQUEST TO DISMISS

vs. (Doc. 92.)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

AND REHABILITATION,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff filed a May 3, 2010 request to dismiss this action. Plaintiff’s attempt to dismiss this

action fails to complywith F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), which requires a stipulation signed by defendants

who have answered or filed a summary judgment motion. As such, this Court DENIES dismissal of this

action in the absence of compliance with F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). This Court ORDERS the parties,

no later than May 6, 2010, to file either: (a) a stipulation which satisfies F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and

a proposed order to dismiss defendants; or (b) papers to show good cause why the parties have failed

to comply with F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). This Court ADMONISHES counsel to obey the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules. This Court FURTHER ADMONISHES counsel

that failure to comply with this order in the absence of good cause will result in imposition of sanctions,

including dismissal of this action with or without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

1

Case 1:06-cv-00349-LJO -SMS Document 93 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:06-cv-00349-LJO -SMS Document 93 Filed 05/03/10 Page 2 of 2