Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01440/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01440-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

STACIA TATUM,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CIV-S-06-1440 RRB EFB

TERESA SCHWARTZ, et al.,

Defendants. 

______________________________________/

Defendants filed a discovery motion on July 3, 2007, and set the matter for hearing on

July 25, 2007, at 10:00 a.m.. Notwithstanding the three days specified by E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-

251, the joint statement shall be filed in no later than five court days before the scheduled

hearing. The filing deadline, accordingly, will be July 18, 2007.

The dispute may be organized by category, with specific discovery items attached, if

appropriate, as an exhibit. For each disputed category or individual item, include: (1) the

specific disputed discovery category or item; (2) the response; (3) the moving party’s position;

and (4) the opposition. E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-251(c)(3). Do not file separate briefing. Id.

Privilege objections must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5). Except in extraordinary

circumstances, the party claiming privilege may not submit a post-hearing privilege log. The

failure properly to support a privilege objection with a privilege log may be deemed to waive it. 

The moving party is responsible for filing the joint statement. The opposing party

nevertheless must timely draft and submit its portion. Failure of either party to use best efforts to

ensure timely filing will be cause for sanctions. 

Dated: July 3, 2007.

___________________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01440-JAM-EFB Document 37 Filed 07/03/07 Page 1 of 1