Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00477/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00477-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATHANIEL BROWN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0477 DFL PAN P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed December 2, 2004, the court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial

statement on or before August 26, 2005. Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order. The

court will therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 16(f); Local Rule 11-110.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action

be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 11-110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that

Case 2:04-cv-00477-DFL-PAN Document 26 Filed 03/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 7, 2006. 

12

brow0477.fpt

Case 2:04-cv-00477-DFL-PAN Document 26 Filed 03/08/06 Page 2 of 2