Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03809/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03809-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 

COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CB EQUITIES, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-03809-DMR 

AMENDED ORDER1 TO SUBMIT 

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN 

SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT 

Re: Dkt. Nos. 40, 59

On February 25, 2016, Plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture 

Trustee for American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2007-1 (“Deutsche Bank” or “Plaintiff”) 

filed a motion for default judgment. [Docket No. 40.] Plaintiff seeks to cancel, extinguish or void 

a stipulated judgment entered by this court on November 26, 2012 in the case of CB Equities, LLC 

v. American Brokers Conduit Corporation, case number 12-cv-5449, later recorded in the Official 

Records of Contra Costa County on November 29, 2012 against the property located at 223 Verde 

Mesa, Danville, California. The court reviewed the Motion for Default Judgment ordered Plaintiff 

to submit supplemental briefing. [Docket No. 56.] On April 13, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted 

supplemental briefing in support of its motion. [Docket No. 59.] 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Docket No. 40] and its Supplemental Brief in 

Support of the Motion for Default Judgment [Docket No. 59] provide no analysis regarding the 

appropriateness of Plaintiff’s requested relief that the court issue a declaration and order that the 

stipulated judgment entered in CB Equities, LLC v. American Brokers Conduit Corporation, case

number 12-cv-5449, was void ab initio and of no force or effect. Plaintiff did not provide an 

 

1

The court’s prior order erroneously set the deadline for the opposition or statement of nonopposition as May 7, 2016, which is a Saturday. This order is amended to extend the deadline for 

the opposition or statement of non-opposition to Monday, May 9, 2016. This order is otherwise 

identical to the court’s original order [Docket No. 67]. 

Case 4:15-cv-03809-JSW Document 69 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

analysis of its entitlement to the requested relief and, in particular, did not address the issue of 

whether a declaration that the stipulated judgment is void, as opposed to voidable, is the 

appropriate remedy in this case. See Mot. for Default Judgment; Supp. Br. at 9. 

Plaintiff shall submit additional briefing by 9:00 a.m. on May 6, 2016, to address the 

deficiency in the motion for default judgment. Plaintiff shall include citations supporting its 

requested relief (a declaration that the stipulated judgment is void). Plaintiff shall provide 

citations to cases that are factually similar, preferably within the Ninth Circuit. 

Any opposition or statement of non-opposition is due no later than May 9, 2016.

Immediately upon receipt of this Order, Plaintiff shall serve Defendant with a copy of 

this Order and file a proof of service with the court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2016

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:15-cv-03809-JSW Document 69 Filed 05/03/16 Page 2 of 2