Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01433/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01433-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Hupperrt & Salgado v. Pittsburg, et al. (No. C-05-1433-JL)

[Proposed] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS

LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF 04-0000H&S/P030.ORDER

Russell A. Robinson, SBN 163937

LAW OFFICE OF RUSSELL A. ROBINSON, APC

345 Grove Street

First Floor

San Francisco CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 255-0462

Facsimile: (415) 431-4526

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

RON HUPPERT and JAVIER SALGADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RON HUPPERT and JAVIER SALGADO,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al.,

Defendants. _____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-05-1433-JL

[Proposed] ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF 

On August 29, 2006, the California Court of Appeal issued a decision, McRae v.

Department of Corrections (06 CDOS 8091). On August 30, 2006, counsel for the parties in this

action appeared and argued the defense motions for summary judgment/adjudication. Neither

side addressed the McRae decision at oral argument. After oral argument, the Court took the

matter under submission.

On September 7, 2006, Defendants herein filed a two-page letter brief, arguing the

McRae decision and its applicability to this case. Defendants did not file a “Statement of

Decision, containing only a citation and providing a copy of the new opinion – without

argument,” as required by local rules.

On September 8, 2006, Plaintiffs requested that they be allowed to file a similar brief, in

the form of a two-page letter, addressing the McRae decision and its relative impact to the record

XXXXXX

Case 3:05-cv-01433-JL Document 116 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Hupperrt & Salgado v. Pittsburg, et al. (No. C-05-1433-JL)

[Proposed] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS

LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF 04-0000H&S/P030.ORDER - 2 -

before the Court in this case, on or before September 13, 2006.

Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Plaintiffs may file a letter brief, not to exceed two pages, addressing the McRae decision

and its impact to the record before the Court in this case, on or before September 13, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: __________, 2006 

Chief Magistrate Judge James Larson

USDC, Northern District of California

Sept 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Larson

Case 3:05-cv-01433-JL Document 116 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2