Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-01449/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-01449-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983pr Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

3:17-cv-1449-CAB-KSC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCO MORENO,

CDCR #AP-8200,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:17-cv-1449-CAB-KSC

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 

AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR 

FAILING TO PREPAY FILING 

FEES REQUIRED BY

28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 

[ECF No. 2]

FRANCISCO MORENO (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at California Health

Care Facility (“CHCF”) in Stockton, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil 

rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff claims the Warden 

and several medical officials at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San 

Diego, California, denied him adequate medical care in violation of the Eighth 

Amendment while he was incarcerated there from January through September 2016. (Id.

at 2-3, 22-23.)

Plaintiff has not prepaid the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); 

instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2).

Case 3:17-cv-01449-CAB-KSC Document 3 Filed 08/10/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 4
2

3:17-cv-1449-CAB-KSC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I. Motion to Proceed IFP

All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 

United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 

$400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 

prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the 

plaintiff is a prisoner at the time of filing, he may be granted leave to proceed IFP, but he 

nevertheless remains obligated to pay the entire fee in “increments,” see Williams v. 

Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless of whether his action is 

ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 

844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). A “prisoner” is defined as “any person” who at the time of 

filing is “incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of, 

sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms or 

conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(h); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 847.

In order to comply with the PLRA, prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must 

also submit a “certified copy of the[ir] trust fund account statement (or institutional 

equivalent) . . . for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the 

complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). From the certified trust account statement, the Court 

assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for 

the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six 

months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(b)(1), (4); see Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850. Thereafter, the institution having custody 

of the prisoner collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month’s 

 

1

In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative 

fee of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court 

Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2014). The additional $50 administrative fee does 

not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. Id.

Case 3:17-cv-01449-CAB-KSC Document 3 Filed 08/10/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 4
3

3:17-cv-1449-CAB-KSC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

income, in any month in which the prisoner’s account exceeds $10, and forwards them to 

the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 

While Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), 

he has not attached a certified copy of his CHCF trust account statements for the 6-month 

period immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); 

S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) clearly requires that prisoners “seeking to bring 

a civil action ... without prepayment of fees ... shall submit a certified copy of the trust 

fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) . . . for the 6-month period 

immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (emphasis 

added). 

Without Plaintiff’s trust account statement, the Court is simply unable to assess the 

appropriate amount of the initial filing fee which is statutorily required to initiate the 

prosecution of this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

II. Conclusion and Order

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is DENIED and the action is 

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $400 filing fee required by 28 

U.S.C. § 1914(a).

(2) Plaintiff is GRANTED forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order in 

which to re-open his case by either: (1) paying the entire $400 statutory and 

administrative filing fee, or (2) filing a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a 

certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of 

his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b).2 

 

2 Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to proceed further by either prepaying the full 

$400 civil filing fee, or submitting a properly supported Motion to Proceed IFP, his 

Complaint will be reviewed before service and may be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), regardless of whether he pays or is 

obligated to pay filing fees. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) 

(en banc) (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits but requires” the court to 

sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to 

Case 3:17-cv-01449-CAB-KSC Document 3 Filed 08/10/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 4
4

3:17-cv-1449-CAB-KSC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a Courtapproved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP” in this 

matter. If Plaintiff neither pays the $400 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and 

files the attached Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of his trust 

account statement within 45 days, this action will remained dismissed without prejudice 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and without further Order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 10, 2017

 

state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune); see also Rhodes v. 

Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing similar screening required by 

28 U.S.C. § 1915A of all complaints filed by prisoners “seeking redress from a 

governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.”). 

Case 3:17-cv-01449-CAB-KSC Document 3 Filed 08/10/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 4 of 4