Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01512/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01512-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MICHAEL BRODHEIM,

Plaintiff,

v.

LOUIE DININNI, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:05-CV-1512-LKK-GGH P

ORDER

The parties have filed a stipulation which provides that plaintiff has withdrawn without

prejudice to refiling his motion to compel filed September 21, 2006, and that defendants are not

obligated to respond to the following discovery requests: 1) Plaintiff’s Third Request for

Production of Documents; 2) Second Set of Interrogatories and Third, Fourth, and Fifth Requests

for Admissions to Defendant Schwarzenegger; 3) Plaintiff’s Second Set of Interrogatories and

Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Requests for Admissions to Defendant Kenneally or his

successor in office; 4) Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories and First and Second Requests for

Admissions to Defendant Perez or her successor in office; 5) Plaintiff’s First Set of

Interrogatories and First Set of Admissions to Defendant Moore or his successor in office; and 6)

Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Admissions to Defendant DiNinni or his

successor in office. The parties have further agreed that the court may enter an order vacating the

Case 2:05-cv-01512-LKK-GGH Document 38 Filed 12/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order

2

scheduling order dates set in the order filed September 12, 2006, and scheduling a status

conference for March 1, 2007. 

The court finds good cause and orders as follows:

1. The dates set in the scheduling order filed September 12, 2006, are vacated;

2. The parties shall file a joint status report addressing the subjects set forth in Local

Rule 16-240(a), as well as his position of whether this action should be stayed pending a decision

in Brodheim v. M. Veal, et al., No. 2:06-CV-02336 LKK GGH and, if not, whether discovery

and scheduling in this case should be coordinated with that proceeding. 

3. Defendants shall file their status report addressing the same subjects on or before

February 22, 2007.

4. A status conference will be held before U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory H.

Hollows at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 24 on March 1, 2007. 

DATED: 12/18/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

__________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

brod1512.po4

Case 2:05-cv-01512-LKK-GGH Document 38 Filed 12/18/06 Page 2 of 2