Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01350/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01350-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES EDWARD BOWELL, 

Plaintiff,

v.

A. DIAZ, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

CASE No. 1:11-cv-1350-AWI-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DISMISSAL

OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS 

(ECF No. 16)

CASE TO REMAIN OPEN

Plaintiff James Edward Bowell is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action filed August 15, 2011 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

(Compl., ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of California. 

On December 3, 2012, Findings and Recommendations were filed in which the

Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff’s Complaint, except for his Eighth

-1-

Case 1:11-cv-01350-AWI-MJS Document 17 Filed 02/11/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Amendment failure to protect claim against Defendants Diaz and Rodriguez, should be

dismissed and that all Defendants, except for Defendants Diaz and Rodriguez, should

be dismissed without prejudice. The parties were notified that objection, if any, was

due within fourteen days after service. No party filed an objection to the Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court adopts in full the Findings and Recommendations filed

December 3, 2012;

2. Plaintiff’s Complaint, except for his Eighth Amendment failure to protect

claim against Defendants Diaz and Rodriguez, is dismissed and all

Defendants named in this action except for Defendants Diaz and

Rodriguez are dismissed without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk is directed this case shall remain open. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 11, 2013 

0m8i78 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

Case 1:11-cv-01350-AWI-MJS Document 17 Filed 02/11/13 Page 2 of 2