Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02196/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02196-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON ALLEN MAGGARD,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2196 GEB KJM P

vs.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Respondents, ORDER

 /

On April 15, 2005, plaintiff filed an opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiis. 

That document was not served on defendants. Plaintiff is advised that every document submitted

to the court for consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to

be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. If an attorney has

filed a document with the court on behalf of any defendant, then documents submitted by

plaintiff must be served on that attorney and not on the defendant. Every document submitted

conventionally to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate

stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to defendants or their attorney and

the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

Case 2:04-cv-02196-GEB -KJM Document 16 Filed 05/04/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the date of

this order plaintiff shall serve a copy of plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss on counsel

for defendants and shall file proper proof of said service. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to

comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff is further cautioned

that failure to serve any documents subsequently filed in this action properly, and failure to

include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

DATED: May 3, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

magg2196.35a

Case 2:04-cv-02196-GEB -KJM Document 16 Filed 05/04/05 Page 2 of 2