Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01733/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01733-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 140
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Dennis Campbell, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Freddie Mac, et. al, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 10-1733-PHX-MHM

ORDER

The Court previously directed Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motion to

dismiss by November 8, 2010 and informed him that failure to response would lead the

court to grant the motion. (Doc. 16) Plaintiff did not file a response. Pursuant to LR.

Civ. 7.2(i) "if the opposing party does not serve and file the required answering

memoranda...such non-compliance may be deemed a consent to the denial or granting of

the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily." See also Brydges v.

Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 652 (9th Cir. 1994). 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendants Sunrise Bank of America and

Neil Barna's Motion for Summary Disposition (doc. 10) seeking a ruling on the Motion to

Dismiss, which was filed in the Maricopa County Superior Court on August 6, 2010

before the case was removed to federal court. 

Case 2:10-cv-01733-RRB Document 17 Filed 12/14/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendants Sunrise Bank of America and

Neil Barna's Motion to Dismiss.

DATED this 13th day of December, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-01733-RRB Document 17 Filed 12/14/10 Page 2 of 2