Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01237/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01237-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FORTE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

HARRIS CRAMER, LLP, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-07-1237 EMC

ORDER RE COSTS OWED TO

VENDORS

On February 3, 2010, the Court held a status conference in the above-referenced case

regarding the continuing dispute over costs owed to vendors. This order memorializes the rulings

made by the Court at the status conference.

(1) For the following vendors, Forte shall provide to TTLG proof of satisfaction, i.e., that

are no outstanding monies due: Advanced Attorney Services; Ivize; Conference Call America; Dan

Mottaz Video; Lyon Reporting; One Source Delivery Service; Quest Discovery Services; S&R

Services; and Summit Court Reporting.

(2) For the following vendors, Forte shall reach a resolution regarding monies owed by

February 10, 2010: Atkinson Baker; McCorkle Video; and Quality Control Documents. Forte shall

provide proof of satisfaction.

(3) For the following vendors, Forte shall reach a resolution regarding monies owed by

February 17, 2010: Regus; Video Depositions; and Grossman & Cotter. Forte shall provide proof of

satisfaction.

Case 3:07-cv-01237-EMC Document 348 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

(4) By February 17, 2010, the parties shall file a joint status report on the costs owed to

vendors. Both parties are expected to keep one another informed during the above timeframes and

mutually cooperate so that any disputes remaining are resolved prior to filing of the joint status

report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2010

_________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cv-01237-EMC Document 348 Filed 02/03/10 Page 2 of 2