Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00706/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00706-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Hunter Storm, an individual,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Capital One Bank, a foreign corporation,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-0706-PHX-LOA

ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE

 On August 2, 2007, Plaintiff timely filed a Motion for Extension of Service of

Process Deadline, requesting an “extension to receive the return receipt [of service of the

Amended Complaint] in this case and file the affidavit of service.” (docket # 11 at 2) Despite

the unsuccessful efforts by chamber’s staff to communicate with Plaintiff’s counsel to

comply with the District Court’s Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Administrative Policies and

Procedure Manual, page 11, Section G., Proposed Orders and Orders, no response was

received from Plaintiff’s counsel. As a result, Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Service of

Process Deadline was denied without prejudice on August 9, 2007 due to an administrative

violation. To date, neither another motion for extension of time for service pursuant to Rule

4(m), FED.R.CIV.P., nor an ECF-compliant proposed order has been filed.

 On the Court’s own motion, 

 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall, on or before Friday, August 24, 2007,

(1) file a motion for extension of time for service pursuant to Rule 4(m), FED.R.CIV.P., for

good cause shown and provide the Court, through its chamber’s email box

Case 2:07-cv-00706-SRB Document 14 Filed 08/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

(anderson_chambers@azd.uscourts.gov), an ECF-compliant proposed order, (2) provide

adequate proof of timely service of process on Defendant “within 120 days after the filing

of the complaint,” as required by Rule 4(m), FED.R.CIV.P., or (3) show good cause in writing

why this lawsuit should not be dismissed without prejudice.

 DATED this 14th day of August, 2007.

 

Case 2:07-cv-00706-SRB Document 14 Filed 08/14/07 Page 2 of 2