Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02445/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02445-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Property Damage

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, NO. CIV S-09-2445 KJM-EFB

v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

EXTENSION OF TIME TO

SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES; et al., RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S 

REQUEST FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND

ORDERING DEFENDANT TO

SERVE PLAINTIFF WITH AN

UNREDACTED VERSION OF ITS

REQUEST

Defendants.

 /

The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to respond to

Defendant Sierra Pacific Industries’ request for reconsideration (ECF 142) and ORDERS

Defendant to serve Plaintiff with an unredacted version of its request for reconsideration. 

Defendant filed its request for reconsideration on February 8, 2011, along with a Request

to Seal Documents in connection with its request for reconsideration. (ECF 142.) The Request

to Seal Documents was made in an effort to comply with Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan’s

Order sealing documents, entered on January 25, 2011. (ECF 138.) This Court has not yet

issued a decision regarding Defendant’s Request to Seal Documents. 

1

Case 2:09-cv-02445-WBS-AC Document 150 Filed 02/11/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Local Rule 303 requires “[a] party seeking reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s

ruling [to] file a request for reconsideration . . . and serve . . . all parties.” In addition, Local

Rule 135 requires “copies of all documents submitted to the Court [to] be serviced upon all

parties to the action . . . .” The redacted version of Defendant’s request for reconsideration is not

a copy of the unredacted version submitted to this Court. 

Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant’s request for reconsideration on or before

February 28, 2011. If a timely response is not submitted, plaintiff will waive all objections.

2. Defendant shall serve Plaintiff with an unredacted version of its request for

reconsideration by February 16, 2011.

DATE: February 11, 2011. 

2

Case 2:09-cv-02445-WBS-AC Document 150 Filed 02/11/11 Page 2 of 2