Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00557/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00557-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCIS AMITEYE NGISSAH,

Plaintiff,

v.

OFFICER SHELTON et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-0557 DAD P

ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed March 23, 2015, plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file a civil 

rights complaint that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. Plaintiff was also ordered to file a complete in 

forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days. The court cautioned 

plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation for dismissal of 

this action without prejudice. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 

complied with the court’s order or otherwise responded to it. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to 

randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:15-cv-00557-MCE-DAD Document 6 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 15, 2015

DAD:9

ngis0557.nocompl(2)

Case 2:15-cv-00557-MCE-DAD Document 6 Filed 05/18/15 Page 2 of 2