Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01473/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01473-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No.2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP 

4864-0474-4707 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Selman Breitman LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

DANIELLE K. LEWIS (SBN 218274) 

dlewis@selmanlaw.com 

MICHAEL O. ZITANI (SBN 317827) 

mzitani@selmanlaw.com 

SELMAN BREITMAN LLP 

33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-4537 

Telephone: 415.979.0400 

Facsimile: 415.979.2099 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, COUNTY 

OF SOLANO, DALTON MCCAMPBELL, LISA 

MCDOWELL and ROY STOCKTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NAKIA VICTORIA PORTER, an individual, 

and JOE BERRY POWELL, JR., an 

individual,, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, 

COUNTY OF SOLANO, DEPUTY DALTON 

MCCAMPBELL, an individual, DEPUTY 

LISA MCDOWELL, an individual, SGT. 

ROY STOCKTON, an individual, and DOES 

1 to 10, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. Case No.2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FURTHER 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

Eastern District Local Rule 144 

Defendants SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, COUNTY OF SOLANO, 

DALTON MCCAMPBELL, LISA MCDOWELL and ROY STOCKTON (collectively 

“Defendants”) and plaintiffs NAKIA VICTORIA PORTER and JOE BERRY POWELL, JR. 

(collectively “Plaintiffs”) hereby stipulate to the following: 

1. Pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 144, Defendants and Plaintiffs hereby 

stipulate to a further extension of time within which Defendants shall file a responsive pleading 

to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. 

2. No Defendant is challenging service of the Complaint. 

3. Defendants’ original deadline to file a responsive pleading was October 19, 2021. 

Case 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP Document 11 Filed 12/09/21 Page 1 of 4
2 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No.2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP 

4864-0474-4707 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Selman Breitman LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

4. On October 11, 2021, the parties entered into a stipulation to extend the time for 

Defendants to file a responsive pleading to November 9, 2021. (ECF No. 5) 

5. On November 8, 2021, the parties entered into a stipulation to further extend the 

time for Defendants to file a responsive pleading to November 16, 2021. (ECF No. 6) 

6. On November 12, 2021, the parties entered into a stipulation to further extend the 

time for Defendants to file a responsive pleading to December 7, 2021. (ECF No. 8) On 

November 15, 2021, the court issued minute order granting the parties’ stipulation. (ECF No. 9) 

7. Counsel for Defendants and counsel for Plaintiffs are continuing their meet and 

confer process in connection with Plaintiffs’ Complaint. Counsel for Plaintiffs has been 

continuing to experience very serious medical issues that have impeded counsel’s ability to 

complete their meet and confer efforts. 

8. Counsel have agreed to a brief additional extension of time for Defendants to 

respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint to allow the parties to conclude their meet and confer efforts, 

including a determination by counsel for Plaintiffs of whether to file an amended complaint. The 

parties’ efforts are intended to avoid motion practice at this stage of the litigation, if possible. 

The responsive pleading on behalf of all named Defendants will be due on December 16, 2021. 

9. Should Defendants choose to file a motion in response to the operative complaint, 

Defendants agree to set the motion for hearing at the earliest available date after January 31, 

2022, subject to the availability of counsel and the Court. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 144(a), that the 

deadline for all named Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be December 16, 

2021. 

DATED: December 6, 2021 ALMADANI LAW 

By: /s/ Yasin M. Almadani

YASIN M. ALMADANI 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

NAKIA VICTORIA PORTER and 

JOE BERRY POWELL, JR. 

Case 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP Document 11 Filed 12/09/21 Page 2 of 4
3 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No.2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP 

4864-0474-4707 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Selman Breitman LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

DATED: December 6, 2021 

SELMAN BREITMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Danielle K. Lewis 

DANIELLE K. LEWIS 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

OFFICE, COUNTY OF SOLANO, 

DALTON MCCAMPBELL, LISA 

MCDOWELL and ROY STOCKTON 

FILER'S ATTESTATION 

I hereby attest that I have been authorized by plaintiff's counsel to show their signature on 

this document as /s/. 

DATED: December 6, 2021 

/s/ Danielle K. Lewis 

 DANIELLE K. LEWIS 

 

Case 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP Document 11 Filed 12/09/21 Page 3 of 4
4 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No.2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP 

4864-0474-4707 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Selman Breitman LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

ORDER 

The foregoing stipulation of the parties is approved, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Defendant’s response to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be filed on or before December 16, 2021. 

DATED: December 8, 2021 

Case 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP Document 11 Filed 12/09/21 Page 4 of 4