Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03933/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03933-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE 

FIRST AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT

BRUCE J. WECKER (CA Bar. No. 078530) 

bwecker@hausfeldllp.com

CHRISTOPHER L. LEBSOCK (CA Bar. 

No.184546) 

clebsock@hausfeldllp.com 

HAUSFELD LLP 

600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3200 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Tel: (415) 633-1908 

Fax: (415) 358-4980 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software 

Inc. 

Robert W. Stone (CA Bar No. 163513) 

robertstone@quinnemanuel.com 

Andrew J. Bramhall (CA Bar No. 253115) 

andrewbramhall@quinnemanuel.com 

Brice C. Lynch (CA Bar No. 288567) 

bricelynch@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

T: 650.801.5000 

F: 650.801.5100 

Attorneys for Defendant IBM Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TWIN PEAKS SOFTWARE INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

IBM CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

 CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST 

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING 

LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED 

JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 

STATEMENT 

Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-03933-JST Document 54 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE 

FIRST AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT

JOINT STIPULATION 

Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software Inc. (“Twin Peaks”) and Defendant International Business 

Machines Corporation (“IBM”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby make a 

stipulated request to amend the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent L.R. 

4-3) (“Joint Statement”) (Dkt. No. 39) and hereby provide notice to the Court that certain claim 

construction disputes have been resolved; 

WHEREAS, the Parties file this stipulation and notice in light of a mutual agreement 

having been reached between the Parties resolving certain issues raised during claim construction 

briefing and discovery; 

WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties, having met and conferred, agreed to amend the Joint 

Statement to reflect (1) IBM’s indefiniteness arguments and alternative constructions for certain 

terms in claims 1 and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 7,418,439 (‘the ‘439 Patent), and (2) Twin Peaks’ 

withdrawal of its assertion of claim 2 of the ‘439 patent against IBM; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have not previously amended or otherwise modified the Joint 

Statement filed on July 15, 2015; 

WHEREAS, at the Technical Tutorial on November 17, 2015, the Parties informed the 

Court that they would be filing an Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement and Pre-Hearing 

Statement that would identify the terms to be construed and provide an order in which those terms 

would be argued at the Markman hearing; 

WHEREAS, the Parties make a stipulated request for the Court to grant leave to file the 

Proposed First Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent 

L.R. 4-3), attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, by 

Twin Peaks and IBM, through their respective counsel, that the Parties shall file the First 

Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3), 

attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

Case 3:14-cv-03933-JST Document 54 Filed 12/14/15 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE 

FIRST AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: December 11, 2015 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

By /s/ Andrew J. Bramhall 

Andrew J. Bramhall 

Attorney for Defendant International Business 

Machines Corporation 

DATED: December 11, 2015 HAUSFELD LLP 

By /s/ Bruce J. Wecker

Bruce J. Wecker 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software Inc..

Case 3:14-cv-03933-JST Document 54 Filed 12/14/15 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:14-cv-03933-JST

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: __________________ 2015 

By 

Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

December 14,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-03933-JST Document 54 Filed 12/14/15 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- Case No. 3:14-cv-03933-JST

FILER’S ATTESTATION 

FILER’S ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i) regarding signatures, I, Andrew J. Bramhall, attest that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I 

declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing 

is true and correct. 

DATED: December 11, 2015 By /s/ Andrew J. Bramhall 

Andrew J. Bramhall 

Attorney for Defendant International Business 

Machines Corporation 

Case 3:14-cv-03933-JST Document 54 Filed 12/14/15 Page 5 of 5