Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01066/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01066-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION ALLOWING 

EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM 

Case No. 06-01066-PJH 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Tel: (650) 849-6600; Fax: (650) 849-6666 

Robert F. McCauley III (Bar No. 162056) 

robert.mccauley@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

901 New York Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20001 

Tel: (202) 408-4000; Fax: (202) 408-4400 

J. Michael Jakes (pro hac vice) 

mike.jakes@finnegan.com 

Gerald F. Ivey (pro hac vice) 

gerald.ivey@finnegan.com 

Christine E. Lehman (pro hac vice) 

christine.lehman@finnegan.com 

Michael A. Morin (pro hac vice) 

michael.morin@finnegan.com 

James R. Barney (pro hac vice) 

james.barney@finnegan.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc., 

Abbott Laboratories, and Abbott Vascular, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC. 

MEDTRONIC USA, INC., MEDTRONIC, 

INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR 

GALWAY, LTD., and EVYSIO MEDICAL 

DEVICES, ULC 

 Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants 

v. 

ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR 

SYSTEMS INC., ABBOTT 

LABORATORIES, and ABBOTT 

VASCULAR, INC. 

 Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs 

and 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 

 Counterclaim-Plaintiff 

 CASE NO. 06-01066-PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER ALLOWING EQUIPMENT IN 

THE COURTROOM 

TUTORIAL: October 12, 2007 

MARKMAN: November 7, 2007 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

Courtroom: 3

 

Case 4:06-cv-01066-PJH Document 232 Filed 10/10/07 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION ALLOWING 

EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM 

Case No. 06-01066-PJH 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs Medtronic Vascular, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic 

Vascular Galway, Ltd., and Evysio Medical Devices ULC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and 

Defendants Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc., Abbott Laboratories, and Abbott Vascular, Inc. 

(collectively, “Defendants”), and Counterclaim Plaintiff Boston Scientific Corporation, by their 

undersigned attorneys, stipulate that, with the Court’s permission, the following equipment be 

allowed into the courtroom for use during the Tutorial set for Friday, October 12, 2007, at 9:00 a.m., 

and for the Markman set for Wednesday, November 7, at 9:00 a.m.: 

1. Six (6) Laptop Computers 

2. One (1) Projection Screen 

3. One (1) Projector 

4. Several cords, connections and demonstrative exhibit boards. 

By his signature below, counsel for Defendants attests that counsel for all parties concur in 

the filing of this stipulation. 

 

Dated: October 5, 2007 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

BY: ____/S/_______________________ 

Cynthia J. Franecki 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Medtronic 

Vascular, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., 

Medtronic, Inc., and Medtronic Vascular 

Galway, Ltd. 

Dated: October 5, 2007 KATTEN MUCHIN & ROSENMAN LLP 

BY: _____/S/______________________ 

Timothy J. Vezeau 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Evysio Medical 

Devices ULC 

Case 4:06-cv-01066-PJH Document 232 Filed 10/10/07 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION ALLOWING 

EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM 

Case No. 06-01066-PJH 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: October 5, 2007 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETTT & DUNNER, LLP 

BY: _____/S/______________________ 

Robert F. McCauley III 

Attorneys for Defendants Advanced 

Cardiovascular Systems Inc., Abbott 

Laboratories, and Abbott XYZ 

Corporation 

Dated: October 5, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

BY: ____/S/_______________________ 

Elizabeth A. Brown 

Attorneys for Counterclaim Plaintiff 

Boston Scientific Corporation

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties may bring the equipment 

identified above into Court at a reasonable time or date, as the parties may arrange with the Deputy 

Clerk, to set up the equipment in advance of the hearings on October 12 and November 7, 2007. 

Dated: _______________ 

 Phyllis J. Hamilton 

United States District Judge 

10/10/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-01066-PJH Document 232 Filed 10/10/07 Page 3 of 3