Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01659/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01659-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT STRINGFELLOW, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

B. FORESTER, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-1659-EFB P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On July 23, 2015, the court found that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 

pauperis was deficient and did not contain the trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(a). Accordingly, the court ordered plaintiff to submit the completed application required 

by § 1915(a) within thirty days and warned him that failure to do so may result in this action 

being dismissed. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not submitted a complete 

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the required trust account statement or 

otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk shall randomly assign a United States 

District Judge to this case. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-01659-JAM-EFB Document 6 Filed 09/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: September 10, 2015. 

Case 2:15-cv-01659-JAM-EFB Document 6 Filed 09/14/15 Page 2 of 2