Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02490/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02490-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation and Order Postponing Early Neutral Evaluation Until Plaintiff’s Counsel Can Have His Motion to

W ithdraw As Counsel Heard

MICHAEL C. SERVERIAN (SBN 133203)

RANKIN, LANDSNESS, LAHDE,

 SERVERIAN & STOCK

96 No. Third Street, Suite 500

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone : (408) 293-0463

Facsimile : (408) 293-9514

Attorneys for Defendant

COUNTY OF SAN BENITO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DANIEL BOGGLEN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COUNTY OF SAN BENITO, and

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-02490 RMW PVT

3 Click here to copy title to footer

STIPULATION AND ORDER POSTPONING

EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION UNTIL

PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL CAN HAVE HIS

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

HEARD

WHEREAS, plaintiff DANIEL BOGGLEN failed to attend his deposition noticed for

September 15, 2006 despite being provided advance notice of the deposition date.

WHEREAS, plaintiff’s counsel William Marder has been attempting without success

to contact DANIEL BOGGLEN on and subsequent to September 15, 2006. Specifically,

plaintiff’s counsel William Marder has dialed Mr. BOGGLEN’s last name telephone

number and determined that the phone number has been disconnected. Additionally,

William Marder mailed to Mr. BOGGLEN a letter on September 18, 2006 and received no

response. 

WHEREAS, the parties had previously scheduled an Early Neutral Evaluation for

September 19, 2006. This Early Neutral Evaluation was scheduled before Amitai

Case 5:06-cv-02490-RMW Document 23 Filed 10/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation and Order Postponing Early Neutral Evaluation Until Plaintiff’s Counsel Can Have His Motion to

W ithdraw As Counsel Heard

Schwartz of Emeryville. The Evaluator and the attorneys agreed to postpone this Early

Neutral Evaluation until October 4, 2006. 

WHEREAS, plaintiff’s counsel William Marder intends to file a motion to withdraw

from the case based on his inability to contact Mr. BOGGLEN and Mr. Marder’s inability to

persuade Mr. BOGGLEN to attend court appearances.

WHEREAS, there is insufficient time to have the subject motion to withdraw heard

prior to the October 4, 2006 Early Neutral Evaluation, the parties desire that Early Neutral

Evaluation be postponed until Mr. Marder’s motion to withdraw as counsel can be heard. 

Dated: __________ Rankin, Landsness, Lahde, Serverian & Stock

By: /s/ Michael C. Serverian 

Micheal C. Serverian, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant 

COUNTY OF SAN BENITO

Dated: __________ Polaris Law Group LLP

By: /s/ William S. Marder 

William L. Marder

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DANIEL BOGGLEN

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________

______________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 5:06-cv-02490-RMW Document 23 Filed 10/19/06 Page 2 of 2