Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01122/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01122-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAFAEL LOPEZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CITY OF VISALIA, TULARE )

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F 05-11226 AWI SMS

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION AND

DISMISSING ACTION

This is a civil action filed by Rafael Lopez. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge for scheduling and discovery matters. Plaintiff failed to timely serve

defendants with the complaint or the court’s order setting a Mandatory Scheduling Conference,

timely e-file a Joint Scheduling Report, attend the court’s Scheduling Conference, or otherwise

contact the court. On March 22, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and

Recommendations that recommended the court dismiss this action for Plaintiff’s failure to

prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to otherwise contact the court. The

Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and gave notice that Plaintiff could file

objections within ten days. Plaintiff did not file objections the Findings and Recommendations. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

(9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the Findings and

Case 1:05-cv-01122-AWI -SMS Document 10 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis Therefore, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 22, 2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute,

failure to comply with court orders, and failure to contact the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01122-AWI -SMS Document 10 Filed 06/02/06 Page 2 of 2