Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03673/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03673-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03673-JD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LINUS ARULIAH, Individually and On 

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LARRY

HSU, G. FREDERICK WILKINSON, and

BRYAN M. REASONS,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 3:14-cv-03673-JD

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAN 

OF ALLOCATION OF NET SETTLEMENT 

FUND

Case 3:14-cv-03673-JD Document 78 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-03673-JD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on November 24, 2015 on the motion of the 

Lead Plaintiff for approval of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated May 27, 

2015 (the “Stipulation”) and the Plan of Allocation; the Court having considered all papers filed and 

proceedings held and otherwise being fully informed;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Pursuant to and in compliance with Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the 

Court finds and concludes that due and adequate notice was directed to persons and entities who are 

Class Members advising them of the Plan of Allocation and of their right to object to it, and a full and 

fair opportunity was accorded to persons and entities who are Class Members to be heard with respect 

to the Plan of Allocation.

2. The Court finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation for the calculation of the 

claims of Authorized Claimants that is set forth in the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of 

Class Action (the “Notice”) disseminated to Class Members provides a fair and reasonable basis upon 

which to allocate the Net Settlement Fund among Class Members.

3. The Court finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation set forth in the Notice is, in all 

respects, fair and reasonable and the Court approves the Plan of Allocation.

Dated: December 21, 2015

___________________________________

The Honorable James Donato

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-03673-JD Document 78 Filed 12/21/15 Page 2 of 2