Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00694/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00694-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stipulation re Substitution of Party 

(Case No. C05 00694 EDL) 

MARK R. WEINSTEIN (State Bar No. 193043) 

MARK F. LAMBERT (State Bar No. 197410) 

WHITE & CASE, LLP 

3000 El Camino Real 

Five Palo Alto Square, Tenth Floor 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

Telephone: (650) 213-0300 

Facsimile: (650) 213-8158 

Attorneys for Non-Party Marshal Limited 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

NETIQ CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ITA NETWORKS, INC., a New Jersey 

Corporation, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 

Case No. C05 00694 EDL 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SUBSTITUTING MARSHAL 

LIMITED AS PLAINTIFF PURSUANT 

TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE 25(C) 

Case 5:05-cv-00694-JF Document 13 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- Stipulation re Substitution of Party 

(Case No. C05 00694 EDL) 

WHEREAS plaintiff NetIQ Corporation (“NetIQ”) filed this action against ITA 

Networks, Inc. (“ITA Networks”) on February 15, 2005; 

WHEREAS the Complaint alleges that defendant ITA Networks engaged in 

trademark infringement and unfair competition through, inter alia, the alleged infringement of 

NetIQ’s “MARSHAL” marks; 

WHEREAS pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement effective December 1, 

2005, NetIQ assigned all right, title and interest in the MARSHAL marks that are the subject of 

the Complaint to Marshal Limited; 

WHEREAS the parties agree that it would be appropriate to substitute Marshal 

Limited as the plaintiff in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(c); and 

WHEREAS ITA Networks has not appeared in this action is not affected by the 

proposed substitution; 

NOW THEREFORE NetIQ and Marshal hereby stipulate, and respectfully request 

that the Court order, as follows: 

1. Marshal Limited is hereby substituted for NetIQ Corporation as plaintiff in the 

above-captioned action. 

 

Dated: January 16, 2006 WHITE & CASE LLP

 Attorneys for Marshal Limited 

 /s/ Mark R. Weinstein /s/ 

 Mark R. Weinstein 

 3000 El Camino Real 

 Five Palo Alto Square, 10th Floor 

 Palo Alto, CA 94306

Case 5:05-cv-00694-JF Document 13 Filed 01/19/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- Stipulation re Substitution of Party 

(Case No. C05 00694 EDL) 

Dated: January 17, 2006 DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff NetIQ Corporation 

 /s/ Eugene Pak /s/ 

 Eugene Pak, Esq. 

 153 Townsend Street, Suite 800 

 San Francisco, CA 94107-1957

Pursuant to General Order 45.X, I, Mark R. Weinstein, hereby attest that Eugene 

Pak of DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary, counsel for NetIQ Corporation, has concurred in this 

filing. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________ __________________________________ 

 The Honorable Elizabeth D. LaPorte 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

January 19, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANTED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 5:05-cv-00694-JF Document 13 Filed 01/19/06 Page 3 of 3