Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05057/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05057-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

*E-Filed 5/9/05*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

KAREEM W. NAHAS, ANDREW NAHAS and

BIG SKY ENTERTAINMENT, Inc., a California

Corporation, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, WHITNEY

McNAIR, in her individual capacity and

representative capacity, and DOES 1 through 50,

INCLUSIVE

Defendants.

 /

Case No. C03-05057 JW (HRL)

INTERIM ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS'

MOTION TO COMPEL

The court, having preliminarily reviewed the moving papers and opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion

to Compel and Request for Sanctions, feels that the parties have engaged in inadequate meet and

confer efforts. See Civ. L.R. 37-1 (counsel required to confer to attempt to resolve disputed

discovery issues before filing a motion to compel); see also Civ. L.R. 1-5(n) ("'confer' means to

communicate directly and discuss in good faith the issue(s) required under the particular Rule or order

. . . [t]he mere sending of a written, electronic, or voice-mail communication" does not satisfy the

requirement). 

//

//

//

Case 5:03-cv-05057-JW Document 80 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to meet and confer either in person or by telephone

concerning plaintiffs' motion. The parties shall submit a joint declaration, to be prepared by plaintiffs,

describing the meet and confer efforts, detailing the issues that have been resolved, and identifying the

issues that remain for the court's determination. Such declaration shall be filed no later than May 18,

2005. The hearing on plaintiffs' motion is continued to May 31, 2005 at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 5/9/05 /s/ Howard R. Lloyd 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:03-cv-05057-JW Document 80 Filed 05/09/05 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS NOTICE WILL BE SENT TO:

Louis A. Leone lleone@stubbsleone.com

Eric J Sidebotham eric.sidebotham@verizon.net 

* Counsel are responsible for providing copies of this order to co-counsel who have not

registered under the Court's ECF system.

Dated: 5/9/05

 /s/ KWN 

Chambers of Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd

Case 5:03-cv-05057-JW Document 80 Filed 05/09/05 Page 3 of 3