Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01010/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01010-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JONATHAN MOSZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DAVID ALLRED, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:19-cv-1010 DB P 

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S 388 

(1971). Plaintiff’s complaint was recently screened and found to state a cognizable Eighth 

Amendment medical indifference claim against Dr. Allred. No other claims were cognizable as 

pled. Plaintiff was then directed to file a notice as to whether he wished to proceed with the 

complaint as screened, to file an amended complaint, or to dismiss this action. Plaintiff has now 

filed a notice of his intent to proceed on the complaint as screened. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this case; 

2. Service has been deemed appropriate for the following defendant: 

DR. ALLRED – Medical Director at Federal Correctional Institution in Herlong, 

California 

Case 2:19-cv-01010-WBS-DB Document 16 Filed 05/04/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

2

3. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, an 

instruction sheet, and a copy of the complaint filed June 3, 2019. 

 4. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached 

Notice of Submission of Documents and submit all of the following documents to the court at the 

same time: 

 a. The completed, signed Notice of Submission of Documents; 

 b. One completed summons; 

 c. One completed USM-285 form for the defendant listed above; and 

 d. Four copies of the endorsed complaint filed June 3, 2019. 

5. Plaintiff shall not attempt to effect service of the amended complaint on defendants or 

request a waiver of service of summons from any defendant. Upon receipt of the above-described 

documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendant 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs; and 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that, other than the Eighth Amendment medical 

indifference claim against Dr. Allred, all other claims and defendants be dismissed without leave 

to amend. 

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District 

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 

fourteen days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, the parties may file 

written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 

F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). 

Dated: May 4, 2020 

 

/DLB7; 

DB/Inbox/Routine/mosz1010.o2+f&r 

 

Case 2:19-cv-01010-WBS-DB Document 16 Filed 05/04/20 Page 2 of 2