Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02313/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02313-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROLLAND C. HANLEY, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-2313 MCE GGH P

vs.

SCHMIDT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 27, 2005, plaintiff filed a document entitled “motion: request for

production of documents and evidence,” as well as a notice of change of address. Plaintiff’s

“motion” may be intended to serve as objections to the May 19, 2005 Findings and

Recommendations. These documents were not served on defendants. Plaintiff is advised that

every document submitted to the court for consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R.

Civ. P. 5. Documents not to be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the

U.S. mail. If an attorney has filed a document with the court on behalf of any defendant, then

documents submitted by plaintiff must be served on that attorney and not on the defendant. 

Every document submitted conventionally to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se)

must include a certificate stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to 

\\\\\

Case 2:03-cv-02313-MCE -GGH Document 37 Filed 06/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

defendants or their attorney and the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and

(c).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the date of

this order plaintiff shall serve a copy of plaintiff’s “motion: request for production of documents

and evidence” and notice of change of address on counsel for defendants and shall file proper

proof of said service. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order may result in

the imposition of sanctions, including having the “motion” disregarded. Plaintiff is further

cautioned that failure to serve any documents subsequently filed in this action properly, and

failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed on that ground alone.

DATED: 6/14/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

hanl2313.35

Case 2:03-cv-02313-MCE -GGH Document 37 Filed 06/14/05 Page 2 of 2