Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520-66/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, O R D E R

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

In accordance with the court’s order issued on June 19, 2006, the Clerk of the Court is

directed to copy and forward by mail to plaintiffs’ counsel, Michael Bien, the Special Master’s

Report on the Status and Sufficiency of the Defendants’ Budget Requests for Staffing to

Implement the Revised Program Guide, as well as the attached exhibits. The Clerk of the Court

is also directed to forward the above-mentioned documents to Robert Sillen, the court-appointed

Receiver in Plata et al v. Schwarzenegger, Civ. S-01-1351 (N.D. Cal.) at: 

Robert Sillen

c/o Judge Thelton E. Henderson

U.S. District Court for 

 the Northern District of California

450 Golden Gate Ave

San Francisco, CA 94102

////

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 1852 Filed 06/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In the report, the Special Master recommends that,

Defendants should be required to incorporate the mental health staffing proposals

included in the CDCR’s FY2006/07 BCP (Exhibit C) for implementing the Program

Guide revisions. Any workload study funded by the defendants ought to be required to

submit findings and recommendations sufficiently timely to be incorporated in the

FY2007/08 budge cycle.

Special Master’s Report at 10-11. 

The parties are to file not later than fifteen (15) days from the effective date of this order,

a memorandum of points and authorities either in support of or in opposition to the Special

Master’s recommendation. The parties are also directed to address the question of whether the

California Department of Finance should be added as a named defendant in this action. Finally,

the parties are asked to brief the issue of whether the Special Master’s report and attached

exhibits should be unsealed.

The parties shall file their briefs under seal. The court will either take the matter under

submission or will order a hearing, if appropriate. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 21, 2006. 

 

Lawrence K. Karlton

Senior Judge

United States District Court

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 1852 Filed 06/21/06 Page 2 of 2