Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-01100/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-01100-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 140
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. # 9) replaced the

Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint filed by Defendant Equifirst Corporation on July 15,

2009 (Doc. # 4).

- 1 - 09cv1100 WQH (WMc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMUEL and DANA KUOHA,

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 09cv1100 WQH (WMc)

ORDER

vs.

EQUIFIRST CORPORATION;

HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL; ETS

SERVICES, LLC; and DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

HAYES, Judge:

On May 20, 2009, Plaintiffs Samuel Kuoha and Dana Kuoha filed a Complaint and

Plaintiff Samuel Kuoha filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. # 1-2). On July

8, 2009, the Court denied the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. # 3). The Court

stated that this case would be closed unless Plaintiffs either paid the requisite $350 filing fee,

or each submitted a more detailed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. # 3 at 2).

On July 16, 2009, Defendant Equifirst Corporation filed an Amended Motion to

Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint.1

 (Doc. # 9). Also on July 16, 2009, Defendants Homecomings

Financial and ETS Services, LLC filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. # 10).

On July 21, 2009, Plaintiffs paid the $350 filing fee. (Doc. # 13).

Case 3:09-cv-01100-WQH-WMC Document 14 Filed 07/24/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 09cv1100 WQH (WMc)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than August 17, 2009, Plaintiff may file a

response to Equifirst Corporation’s Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc.

# 9) and Homecomings Financial and ETS Services, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 10).

No later than August 24, 2009, Defendants may file a reply to Plaintiffs’ response. There will

be no oral argument or hearing on the motions.

DATED: July 24, 2009

WILLIAM Q. HAYES

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01100-WQH-WMC Document 14 Filed 07/24/09 Page 2 of 2