Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-540/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRANSLATION PROTOCOL; 

Master File No. 07-CV-5944-JST 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Guido Saveri (22349) 

guido@saveri.com 

R. Alexander Saveri (173102) 

rick@saveri.com 

Geoffrey C. Rushing (126910) 

grushing@saveri.com 

Cadio Zirpoli (179108) 

cadio@saveri.com 

Matthew D. Heaphy (227224) 

mheaphy@saveri.com 

SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. 

706 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 217-6810 

Facsimile: (415) 217-6813 

Lead Counsel for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

____________________________________ 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS

Master File No. 07-CV-5944-JST 

MDL No. 1917 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE TRANSLATION PROTOCOL 

Judge: Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 5341 Filed 10/09/18 Page 1 of 3
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRANSLATION PROTOCOL; 

Master File No. 07-CV-5944-JST 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“DPPs”) and Defendants Irico Display Devices Co., Ltd. and 

Irico Group Corporation (together, the “Irico Defendants” or “Irico”), by and through the 

undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, the Irico Defendants have submitted several hundred pages of translated 

documents in connection with their two motions to dismiss filed on July 18, 2018 (ECF Nos. 5312, 

5313) (“Motions”); 

WHEREAS, in many cases, only a small portion of a document is relevant to the matters at 

issue in the Motions; 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid the significant time and expense associated with 

reviewing for accuracy the portions of the translated documents not at issue, objecting to 

inaccuracies, and resolving those objections; 

WHEREAS, the parties may agree on adjustments to the translation protocol, set forth in 

section XVI of the Court’s Order re Discovery and Case Management Protocol, ECF No. 1128 

(Apr. 3, 2012), to promote efficiency or fairness;

WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel 

for DPPs and the Irico Defendants: 

1. DPPs will serve objections to translations relied upon in Irico’s opening briefs in a 

separate document on or before the due date for DPPs’ opposition to the motions to dismiss. 

2. Irico will serve objections to translations relied upon in DPPs’ opposition briefs in a 

separate document on or before the due date for Irico’s reply briefs. 

3. DPPs will serve objections to translations relied upon in Irico’s reply briefs in a 

separate document within thirty (30) days after Irico’s reply briefs are filed. 

4. Objections to translations are only necessary for the relevant portions of documents 

upon which either party relies, with parties reserving the right to object to any other portions of the 

translations at a later date. 

5. The Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs are not required to serve initial translation 

objections at this time but will participate in the objection resolution process. 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 5341 Filed 10/09/18 Page 2 of 3
3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRANSLATION PROTOCOL; 

Master File No. 07-CV-5944-JST 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

6. The parties will meet and confer with regard to the procedure to resolve any 

objections and final resolution to objections requiring approval from all parties. 

Dated: October 3, 2018 

/s/ R. Alexander Saveri /s/ Stuart C. Plunkett 

Guido Saveri (22349) John Taladay (pro hac vice) 

R. Alexander Saveri (173102) john.taladay@bakerbotts.com 

Geoffrey C. Rushing (126910) Erik T. Koons (pro hac vice) 

Cadio Zirpoli (179108) erik.koons@bakerbotts.com 

Matthew D. Heaphy (227224) BAKER BOTTS LLP 

SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. 1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

706 Sansome Street Washington, D.C. 20004 

San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 202.639.7700 

Telephone: (415) 217-6810 Facsimile: 202.639.7890 

Facsimile: (415) 217-6813 

 Stuart C. Plunkett (State Bar No. 187971) 

Lead Counsel for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs stuart.plunkett@bakerbotts.com 

 BAKER BOTTS LLP 

 101 California Street, Suite 3070 

 San Francisco, California 94111 

 Telephone: (415) 291-6200 

 Facsimile: (415) 291-6300 

 

 Attorneys for Defendants Irico Group Corp. 

 and Irico Display Devices Co., Ltd. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________ By: ___________________________ 

 Jon S. Tigar 

 United States District Judge

October 9, 2018

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 5341 Filed 10/09/18 Page 3 of 3