Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-01300/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-01300-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CISCO SYSTEMS INC, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 13-cv-01300-JSW 

ORDER REGARDING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO 

SEAL 

Re: Docket Nos. 293, 316, 322 

There are several administrative motions to seal pending in this case. (Docket Nos. 293, 

316, and 322.) The Court finds that the current responses are too broad to enable the Court to 

determine why particular page and line cites or deposition testimony should be maintained under 

seal. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that any party who seeks to maintain information, which is 

currently redacted, under seal to file further supplemental responses to the motions by March 1, 

2016. 

The supplemental responses shall be in table format that in one column shall identify by 

document, and page and line the material that is currently redacted and in a second column shall 

set forth the basis on which the material should be sealed. By way of example: 

ChriMar’s Motion to Amend, 3:6-12 The reason this material is sealable is ______.

The Court notes that, with respect to deposition testimony that is not relied upon by a 

particular party, the Court will be willing to order that extraneous testimony be redacted. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

Case 4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document 326 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

rec

Da

P 

As this 

ord will not 

IT IS S

ated: Februar

Court previ

be sealed. 

SO ORDER

ry 9, 2016 

ously stated

ED. 

2

, with respect to the part

JE

Un

ies’ briefs, c

EFFREY S. W

nited States D

citations to t

WHITE 

District Judg

the factual 

e 

Case 4:13-cv-01300-JSW Document 326 Filed 02/09/16 Page 2 of 2