Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07916/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07916-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Justin Fok, Esq., CSBN: 242272 

Law Offices of Jean D. Chen 

2107 N. First Street, Suite 300 

San Jose, CA 95131 

Telephone: (408) 437-1788 

Facsimile: (408) 437-9788 

Email: jfok@jclawoffice.com

Attorney for 

Chun Yuet Yeung 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Chun Yuet Yeung, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the 

Department of Homeland Security; 

Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director of United States 

Citizenship and Immigration Services; 

Christina Poulos, Director of the California 

Service Center, United States Citizenship and 

Immigration Services; 

Robert S. Mueller III, Director of the Federal 

Bureau of Investigation, 

 

 Defendants 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 06-07916 RS 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO 

DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO THE 

COURT’S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

Plaintiff, by and through her attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their attorneys 

of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to an extension of the due date 

for Plaintiff’s response to the Defendants’ answer to the Court’s January 3, 2007 Order to Show 

Cause for the following reasons: 

1. The plaintiff, through her attorney, Stanley Chao, filed a mandamus action on 

Case No. C 06-07916 RS 

Stipulation to Extend Plaintiff’s Response 

1

*E-FILED 6/18/07*

AND ORDER THEREON

Case 5:06-cv-07916-RS Document 10 Filed 06/18/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

December 27, 2006. 

2. This Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) on January 3, 2007, directing 

Defendants to show cause within sixty days after receiving service of the complaint. 

Plaintiff was permitted to file a response to Defendants’ OSC answer within twenty 

days after receipt of the answer. 

3. The plaintiff served the United States Attorney’s Office on January 9, 2007. 

4. Defendants filed their OSC answer on March 6, 2007. 

5. Counsel for Plaintiff did not file an answer within the specified time and withdrew as 

counsel on June 4, 2007. 

6. Plaintiff retained new counsel, and a Notice of Appearance was filed on June 7, 2007. 

7. In order to allow sufficient time for Plaintiff’s counsel to respond to Defendants’ 

OSC answer, the parties hereby respectfully request this Court to extend Plaintiff’s 

response date as follows: 

Last day for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants’ OSC answer: July 5, 2007 

Dated: June 14, 2007 __________/s/_______________

 Justin G. Fok

 Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: June 14, 2007 _________/s/________________ 

 Edward Olsen

 Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorney for Defendants

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case No. C 06-07916 RS 

Stipulation to Extend Plaintiff’s Response 

2

Case 5:06-cv-07916-RS Document 10 Filed 06/18/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: ______________________ 

 Richard Seeborg

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case No. C 06-07916 RS 

Stipulation to Extend Plaintiff’s Response 

3

June 18, 2007

Case 5:06-cv-07916-RS Document 10 Filed 06/18/07 Page 3 of 3