Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_19-cv-06151/USCOURTS-cand-5_19-cv-06151-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

A. O., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-06151-SVK 

ORDER IN PREPARATION FOR 

HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION 

FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Re: Dkt. No. 10

The parties are set for hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction on March 

24, 2020. Dkt. 10. In advance of the hearing, the Court identifies the following issues on which it 

would like the parties to focus:

1. The Court has considered carefully the cases of White v. Lee, 227 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir. 

2000); Rosebrock v. Mathis, 745 F.3d 963 (9th Cir. 2014); and Fikre v. Federal Bureau 

of Investigation, 904 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2018). How do the facts of the instant case 

compare with White and Rosebrock, and how should those comparisons guide this 

Court’s decision? 

2. Given that the class representatives’ claims have been adjudicated, and in light of the

current COVID-19 public health crisis, should the Court wait until the J.L. settlement 

is fully adjudicated to issue a decision on the instant motion?

3. If the Court finds that a preliminary injunction is warranted, what is the appropriate 

scope of the injunction, particularly, but not exclusively, with regards to an obligation 

on the Government to provide notification of an immigration action against any 

putative class member? 

////

////

Case 5:19-cv-06151-SVK Document 57 Filed 03/18/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Additionally, in accordance with General Order 72, this hearing will be conducted 

telephonically. To ensure adequate connectivity, this hearing will be conducted via Court Call. 

Counsel are instructed to contact Court Call at 1-866-582-6878 to arrange for their telephonic 

appearances.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 18, 2020

SUSAN VAN KEULEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:19-cv-06151-SVK Document 57 Filed 03/18/20 Page 2 of 2