Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. 

___________________________________/

No. C15-0262 EMC

ORDER DEFERRING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND CONSIDERATION OF

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION 

(Docket No. 62)

On May 22, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to compel Plaintiffs’ claims to individual

arbitration pursuant to an arbitration provision contained in the 2013 Software License & Online

Services Agreement (2013 Agreement) between the parties. See Docket No. 62. In related

litigation, this Court currently has under submission two motions to compel arbitration filed by

Uber pursuant to the same 2013 Agreement. See Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 14-cv5200, Dkt. No. 28 (Uber’s Motion to Compel Arbitration); Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No.

14-cv-5241, Dkt. No. 16 (Uber’s Motion to Compel Arbitration). The Court expects to issue a

ruling on these motions in due course.

In order to aid the parties and the Court by focusing the briefing on the salient issues the

Court will identify in its Order, the Court hereby defers the briefing schedule on Uber’s motion to

compel arbitration filed in this case until after its issues its Order in Mohamed and Gillette. 

Plaintiffs’ opposition to Uber’s motion shall be due two weeks after the date of this Court’s Order

in Mohamed and Gillette, and Uber’s reply in support of its motion shall be due one week

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 67 Filed 05/26/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

thereafter. The Court sets July 23, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. as the provisional hearing date for Uber’s

motion to compel arbitration. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 26, 2015

_________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 67 Filed 05/26/15 Page 2 of 2