Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01160/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01160-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH THOMAS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-01160-JST 

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE 

TO ORDER RE: SERVICE DEADLINES

Re: ECF No. 166

On November 18, 2015, the Court issued an order requesting a response from Plaintiffs in 

regards to two defendants in the case who had not yet been served. ECF No. 161. Before the 

Court is Plaintiffs’ Response, filed on November 30, 2015. ECF No. 166.

Pursuant to their proposal, Plaintiffs shall have until December 21, 2015, to file either a 

motion to partially lift the discovery stay or a motion for alternate service. Upon receipt of either 

the addresses for Defendants Park and Hwang or leave to effect service in some other way, 

Plaintiffs shall have sixty days to complete service.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 1, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-01160-JST Document 168 Filed 12/01/15 Page 1 of 1