Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01021/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01021-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Robert C. Niesley, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 131373) 

Joseph C. McGowan, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 166426) 

Nicholas A. Merrell, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 240795) 

WATT, TIEDER, HOFFAR & FITZGERALD, L.L.P. 

Citigroup Center 

One Sansome Street, Suite 1050 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone (415) 623-7000 

Facsimile (415) 623-7001 

rniesley@wthf.com

jmcgowan@wthf.com

nmerrell@wthf.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Travelers Casualty and Surety Company 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C 06-01021 PJH 

[PROPOSED] DISMISSAL ORDER 

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY 

COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, a California municipal 

corporation; GENERAL MOTORS 

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; 

LORONIX, INC., A California corporation, 

VERINT SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation 

 Defendants. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

[PROPOSED] DISMISSAL ORDER

Case 4:06-cv-01021-PJH Document 59 Filed 10/12/06 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) and the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal,

Plaintiff, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY (“TRAVELERS”), and Defendant, 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (“CCSF”), by and through counsel, have represented to 

the Court that all claims between those parties have been satisfactorily resolved and settled, pursuant to 

which they jointly move for dismissal with prejudice of all causes of action asserted by TRAVELERS 

against CCSF, and for the dismissal with prejudice of all causes of action asserted by CCSF against 

TRAVELERS. 

Upon consideration whereof and for good cause shown, it is accordingly ORDERED that all 

causes of action asserted by TRAVELERS against CCSF, and all causes of action asserted by CCSF 

against TRAVELERS be, and the same hereby are, DISMISSED, with prejudice, with the parties bearing 

their own costs, attorney’s fees and expenses relating to this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________, 2006 _________________________________ 

 The Honorable Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton 

[PROPOSED] DISMISSAL ORDER

October 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-01021-PJH Document 59 Filed 10/12/06 Page 2 of 2