Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-07124/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-07124-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREA C. WOOD,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-07124-MMC 

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT 

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; 

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

By order flied November 8, 2019, the Court directed plaintiff Andrea Wood to show 

cause why the complaint filed in the above-titled action should not be dismissed without 

leave to amend. Now before the Court is plaintiff's response to said order to show cause. 

Having read and considered plaintiff's response, the Court rules as follows.

In its order to show cause, the Court found the above-titled action was, in all 

material respects, identical to a prior action filed by plaintiff, which action had been 

dismissed on the ground it was barred by the Rooker-Feldman and Younger doctrines. 

In her response, plaintiff fails to respond to the Court's finding; significantly, plaintiff 

neither denies the instant action is duplicative of her prior action, nor explains why the 

instant action likewise is not barred by said doctrines.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Court's order of November 8, plaintiff's 

complaint is hereby DISMISSED without leave to amend, and without prejudice.

The Clerk of Court shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 3, 2019

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:19-cv-07124-MMC Document 11 Filed 12/03/19 Page 1 of 1