Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00997/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00997-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RAJ SINGH, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-0997 MCE AC (PS) 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per, and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local 

Rule”) 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

 In the order granting plaintiff IFP status, plaintiff was ordered to file a statement with the 

court showing that he had submitted the required service documents to the U.S. Marshal. See 

ECF No. 3. Plaintiff has not done so, and the docket shows no activity since that order was 

issued on May 13, 2015. 

 Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that: 

 1. The Initial Scheduling Conference, now set for October 28, 2015, is VACATED; and 

//// 

//// 

//// 

Case 2:15-cv-00997-AC Document 7 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 2. Plaintiff shall Show Cause, in writing, no later than October 28, 2015 at 4:30 p.m., why 

this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. 

DATED: October 15, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-00997-AC Document 7 Filed 10/16/15 Page 2 of 2