Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-04674/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-04674-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 12:635 Breach of Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IOANNIS KANELLAKOPOULOS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNIMERICA LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-04674-BLF 

ORDER RE JOINT STATEMENT 

REGARDING PROPOSED CHANGES 

TO THE JUROR QUESTIONNAIRE

[Re: ECF 209]

The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Statement Regarding Proposed Changes to the 

Juror Questionnaire (ECF 209). 

The Court GRANTS Defendant’s unopposed request to add proposed question 26, as 

MODIFIED by the Court. The Court has modified proposed question 26 by combining it with 

proposed question 27. Question 26 shall read:

26. Have you or anyone close to you ever suffered an important loss where you filed 

any sort of claim or lawsuit, or wanted to file a claim or lawsuit?

Yes, please describe:

Because it has combined Defendant’s proposed questions 26 and 27, as set forth above, the 

Court DENIES Defendant’s request to add proposed question 27 separately.

The Court DENIES Defendant’s request to add proposed question 28 on the grounds that it 

is unclear and confusing.

Case 5:15-cv-04674-BLF Document 212 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The Court DENIES Defendant’s request to delete questions 16, 18, 21, 31, and 33 from the 

questionnaire.1 Defendant’s request is untimely. Although the Court granted Defendant leave to 

propose 2 or 3 additional questions, the Court did not invite Defendant to propose deletions of 

questions already approved by the Court without objection by Defendant. 

Plaintiff shall add question 26 to the questionnaire, using the modified language set forth 

above. After Defendant reviews the change and approves it as to form, Plaintiff shall deliver 50 

copies of the revised questionnaire to the Court by 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 22, 2018. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 20, 2018

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

 

1

These question numbers do not correlate to the original questionnaire submitted by Plaintiff and 

discussed by the Court at the Final Pretrial Conference, but rather to a revised version of the 

questionnaire implementing changes the Court directed Plaintiff to make.

Case 5:15-cv-04674-BLF Document 212 Filed 02/20/18 Page 2 of 2