Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-04635/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-04635-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWIN JAY HUTCHINSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA PRISON INDUSTRY 

AUTHORITY, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

No. C 13-04635 CW

 

FURTHER ORDER 

REGARDING 

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE 

TO THE MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On May 3, 2016, the Court ordered Defendant A. Deems to file 

a notice when he produced certain photographs to Plaintiff Edwin 

Hutchinson. The Court further ordered that Plaintiff’s response 

to Defendants’ motions for summary judgment would be due within 

twenty-eight days thereafter. On May 6, 2016, Defendant Deems 

filed a notice that he produced the photographs to Plaintiff on 

that date. Docket No. 184. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s response to 

the motions for summary judgment should be due by Friday, May 27, 

2016. On May 9, 2016, Plaintiff wrote a letter to the Court 

stating that he would not respond to the motions for summary 

judgment until twenty-eight after he received color photographs. 

Docket No. 185. However, Magistrate Judge Beeler’s discovery 

order does not require the production of color photographs. 

Docket No. 181. 

Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ motions for summary 

judgment is due by June 13, 2016. Defendants’ response is due 

within fourteen days thereafter. If Plaintiff fails to respond 

Case 4:13-cv-04635-CW Document 186 Filed 05/16/16 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

to the motions for summary judgment by June 13, 2016, the Court 

may consider the motions to be unopposed or dismiss the case for 

failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 16, 2016

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:13-cv-04635-CW Document 186 Filed 05/16/16 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWIN JAY HUTCHISON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA PRISON INDUSTRY 

AUTHORITY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-04635-CW 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in 

the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District 

of California.

That on May 16, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) 

of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid 

envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by 

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said 

copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the 

Clerk's office.

Edwin Jay Hutchison ID: P-68859

1-N-34

San Quentin State Prison

One Main St.

San Quentin, CA 94964 

Dated: May 16, 2016

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District 

Court

By:________________________

Nichole Peric, Deputy Clerk to 

the Honorable CLAUDIA WILKEN

Case 4:13-cv-04635-CW Document 186 Filed 05/16/16 Page 3 of 3