Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03248/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03248-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding 

Deadline To Respond To Complaint 

MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Daniel M. Wall (Bar No. 102580) 

Dan.Wall@lw.com

Belinda S Lee (Bar No. 199635) 

Belinda.Lee@lw.com

Brendan A. McShane (Bar No. 227501) 

Brendan.McShane@lw.com

Christopher B. Campbell (Bar No. 254776) 

Christopher.Campbell@lw.com

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111-6538 

Telephone: +1.415.391.0600 

Facsimile: +1.415.395.8095 

Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Samsung Storage 

Technology Korea Corporation, Toshiba Samsung 

Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba 

Corporation, and Toshiba America Information 

Systems, Inc.

[Additional Parties and Counsel Listed on Signature 

Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

Base Case No. 3:10-md-02143-RS

MDL No. 2143 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03248-RS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

This document relates to: 

Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee for the Circuit 

City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust,

Plaintiff, 

v.

Sony Corporation, et al., 

Defendants.

Case 3:15-cv-03248-RS Document 16 Filed 11/02/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding 

Deadline To Respond To Complaint 

MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS

WHEREAS, on July 13, 2015, plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee for the Circuit City 

Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust (the “Trustee”) filed the above-captioned action; 

WHEREAS, on August 5, 2015, the Court approved the Parties’ stipulation setting the 

date for any response to the Complaint as 90 days from the date of service of process (Dkt. No. 

10);

WHEREAS, Defendants received service of process on different dates, and therefore 

Defendants’ responses to the Complaint are currently due as early as November 3 and as late as 

November 24; 

WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Defendants have conferred and agree that, for purposes 

of judicial and party efficiency, it makes sense to coordinate a single date for Defendants’ 

responses to the Complaint. 

It is therefore STIPULATED and AGREED, subject to Court approval, that: 

1. All Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before 

November 13, 2015. 

2. If any motions to dismiss are filed, Plaintiff’s opposition shall be due 60 days after 

the filing of any said motion to dismiss, and any reply shall be due 30 days after the filing of 

Plaintiff’s opposition. 

3. This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by Defendants of any defense, 

including but not limited to those defenses provided under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: November 2, 2015 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

By /s/ Belinda S Lee 

Daniel M. Wall 

Belinda S Lee 

Brendan A. McShane 

Christopher B. Campbell 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Tel: 415-395-8240 

Fax: 415-395-8095 

Case 3:15-cv-03248-RS Document 16 Filed 11/02/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding 

Deadline To Respond To Complaint 

MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS

Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Samsung Storage 

Technology Korea Corporation, Toshiba Samsung 

Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba 

Corporation, and Toshiba America Information 

Systems, Inc. 

Dated: November 2, 2015 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 

By /s/ John M. Taladay 

John M. Taladay 

Evan Werbel 

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Telephone: (202) 639-7700 

Facsimile: (202) 639-7890 

Counsel for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V., 

Lite-On IT Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital 

Solutions Corporation and Philips & Lite-On 

Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc. 

Dated: November 2, 2015 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

By /s/ John F. Cove, Jr. 

 

John F. Cove, Jr.

Steven C. Holtzman 

Kieran P. Ringgenberg

Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson 

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 874-1000 

Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 

Attorneys for Defendants Sony Optiarc America 

Inc., Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony Corp. and Sony 

Electronics Inc.

Dated: November 2, 2015 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By /s/ Ian Simmons 

 

Ian Simmons 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

1625 Eye Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Telephone: (202) 383-5300 

Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 

Case 3:15-cv-03248-RS Document 16 Filed 11/02/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding 

Deadline To Respond To Complaint 

MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-2143-RS; 3:15-cv-03248-RS

James M. Pearl 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

1999 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 246-8434 

Facsimile: (310) 246-6779 

Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., 

Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Dated: November 2, 2015 KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP

By /s/ Colleen M. Keating 

Michael L. Tuchin 

Robert J. Pfister 

Colleen M. Keating 

KLEE, TUCHIN, BOGDANOFF & STERN LLP

1999 Avenue of the Stars, Thirty-Ninth Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Tel: 310-407-4000 

Fax: 310-407-9090 

Counsel for Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee 

for the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN THE FILING 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule No. 5-1(i)(3), I declare that concurrence has been obtained 

from each of the above signatories to file this document with the Court. 

/s/ Belinda S Lee 

 BELINDA S LEE 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 

 HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

11/2/15

Case 3:15-cv-03248-RS Document 16 Filed 11/02/15 Page 4 of 4