Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02235/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02235-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEE THAO,

Plaintiff, No. 2:11-cv-2235 KJM AC P

vs.

KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Warden,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On September 26, 2012, defendant filed a motion to dismiss this action. See Doc.

No. 25. Any opposition or statement of no opposition by plaintiff would have been due on or

before October 22, 2012. See L.R. 230(l). To date, plaintiff has not filed any opposition or

statement in response to the motion to dismiss.

The court reminds plaintiff that failure of a responding party to file an opposition

or statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the

motion. See L.R. 230(l). The court will accordingly sua sponte grant plaintiff an extension of

30 days, and if plaintiff chooses not to file an opposition in that time, the court will consider that

defendant’s motion to be unopposed.

1

Case 2:11-cv-02235-KJM-AC Document 27 Filed 12/07/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s time to file an

opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss is extended for 30 days from the filing date of this

order.

DATED: December 7, 2012.

` 

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AC:rb

thao2235.36

2

Case 2:11-cv-02235-KJM-AC Document 27 Filed 12/07/12 Page 2 of 2