Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02233/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02233-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

T.D. HUDKINS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2233 LEW KJM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed October 26, 2007, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff

was granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint and an application to proceed in

forma pauperis. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended

complaint and his application to proceed in forma pauperis, or otherwise responded to the court’s

order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:07-cv-02233-LEW -KJM Document 15 Filed 04/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 4, 2008. 

1

hudk2233.fta

Case 2:07-cv-02233-LEW -KJM Document 15 Filed 04/04/08 Page 2 of 2