Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-02024/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-02024-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LAW

MEN LO PAR K

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

[Counsel for all parties listed on the signature page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

RADWARE, LTD., an Israeli company;

RADWARE, INC., a New Jersey

corporation,

Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants,

v.

F5 NETWORKS, INC., a Washington 

corporation,

Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff.

CASE NO. 5:13-cv-02024 RMW 

(Related Case No. 5:13-cv-02021 RMW.)

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER 

ENLARGING TIME FOR DISPOSITIVE 

MOTION BRIEFING PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL L.R. 6-2, [] ORDER,

AND DECLARATION OF SRULI YELLIN

IN SUPPORT THEREOF

(),/('

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 193 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs Radware 

Ltd. and Radware, Inc. (collectively, “Radware”) and Defendant F5 Networks, Inc. (“F5”), that 

the deadlines for filing Oppositions and Replies to the parties’ dispositive motions should be 

extended, subject to the approval of this Court in consideration of the following facts:

WHEREAS, on May 7, 2015, the Court extended the deadline for filing dispositive 

motions from April 10, 2015 to May 29, 2015 pursuant to stipulation by the parties (Dkt. 174);

WHEREAS, on May 29, 2015, Radware filed its (a) Motion for Partial Summary

Judgment of Infringement (Dkt. 182) and (b) its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

Dismissing F5’s Invalidity Defense (Dkt. 189);

WHEREAS, on May 29, 2015, F5 filed its (a) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 

Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. 180), (b) Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity (Dkt. 183); 

(c) Motion for Summary Judgment on Damages Issues (Dkt. 187); and (d) Motion for Summary

Judgment of Non-Infringement (Dkt. 190);

WHEREAS, per Local Rule 7-3, Oppositions to dispositive motions are due no later than 

June 12, 2015 and Replies are due no later than June 19, 2015;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that an extension is necessary to accommodate each party’s 

schedule and to allow sufficient time for the parties to prepare their Oppositions and Replies to 

the dispositive motions filed May 29, 2015;

WHEREAS, such extension should not impact the hearing date for these motions, 

currently set for July 24, 2015;

WHEREAS, the undersigned counsel met and conferred and agreed that, subject to the 

Court’s approval, the dates for Oppositions and Replies to the dispositive motions filed on May

29, 2014 should be as follows:

Event Original Dates New Dates

Opposition to Dispositive Motion Friday, June 12, 2015 Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Reply to Dispositive Motion Friday, June 19, 2015 Tuesday, July 7, 2015

SO STIPULATED this 3rd day of June, 2015.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 193 Filed 06/04/15 Page 2 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

Dated: June 3, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

By:/s/ L. Kieran Kieckhefer

L. Kieran Kieckhefer

FABIO E. MARINO (SBN 183825)

fmarino@mwe.com

A. MARISA CHUN (SBN 160351)

mchun@mwe.com

L. KIERAN KIECKHEFER (SBN 251978)

kkieckhefer@mwe.com

NITIN GAMBHIR (SBN 259906)

ngambhir@mwe.com

BARRINGTON DYER (SBN 264762)

bdyer@mwe.com

TERI H.P. NGUYEN (SBN 267498)

thpnguyen@mwe.com

SRULI YELLIN (SBN 291431)

syellin@mwe.com

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100

Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004

Telephone: 650 815 7400

Facsimile: 650 815 7401

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS AND 

COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS 

RADWARE, INC. AND RADWARE, LTD.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 193 Filed 06/04/15 Page 3 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

Dated: June 3, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

PERKINS COIE LLP

By:/s/ Ramsey Al-Salam

Ramsey Al-Salam

RAMSEY M. AL-SALAM (Pro Hac Vice)

Ralsalam@perkinscoie.com

NATHANIEL E. DURRANCE (SBN 229210)

Ndurrance@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

1201 Third Street, Ste. 4800

Seattle, WA 98101-3099

Telephone: 206-359-6385

Facsimile: 206-359-7385

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT AND 

COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT F5 

NETWORKS, INC.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 193 Filed 06/04/15 Page 4 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 4 -

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5.1, I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing 

of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a “conformed” 

signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence 

for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request.

Dated: June 3, 2015 /s/ L. Kieran Kieckhefer

L. Kieran Kieckhefer

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 193 Filed 06/04/15 Page 5 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

[] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:___________

HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 193 Filed 06/04/15 Page 6 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

DECLARATION OF SRULI YELLIN

I, Sruli Yellin, state and declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney with McDermott Will & Emery LLP and counsel of record for 

Radware, Inc. and Radware Ltd. (collectively, “Radware”), in the above-captioned matter. I have 

knowledge of the following, and if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently to 

the contents herein. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), I hereby submit this declaration in support of 

the parties’ stipulated request to enlarge time.

2. Counsel for Radware and F5 have met and conferred and agreed that, subject to 

the Court’s approval, the dates for Oppositions and Replies to the dispositive motions filed on 

May 29, 2014 should be as follows:

Event Original Dates New Dates

Opposition to Dispositive Motion Friday, June 12, 2015 Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Reply to Dispositive Motion Friday, June 19, 2015 Tuesday, July 7, 2015

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 3rd day of June, 2015, in Menlo Park, California.

/s/ Sruli Yellin

Sruli Yellin

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 193 Filed 06/04/15 Page 7 of 7