Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01257/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01257-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

L.A. TAXI COOPERATIVE, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-01257-JST 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

AMEND ANSWER

Re: ECF No. 87

The parties have filed a stipulation requesting Defendants be granted leave to file a Second 

Amended Answer in order to add an additional affirmative defense. ECF No. 87. Because the 

parties have so stipulated, the request is granted. Defendants shall file their Second Amended 

Answer within three days of the date of this order. Pursuant to the stipulation, any motion to 

strike the Second Amended Answer shall be filed within twenty-one days of the date Defendants 

serve the Second Amended Answer. ECF No. 87 at 3.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 9, 2016

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01257-JST Document 88 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 1