Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02356/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02356-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2356

CAROLYN W. FORD; JOSEPH FORD, SR.; RANDY C. FORD,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

JAMES F. ROHR; WILLIAM S. DEMCHAK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:14-cv-03158-RDB)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carolyn W. Ford, Joseph Ford, Sr., Randy C. Ford, Appellants Pro 

Se. Jessica Hepburn Sadler, John Darren Sadler, Daniel J. 

Tobin, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2356 Doc: 18 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn W. Ford, Joseph Ford, Sr., and Randy C. Ford 

(Appellants) appeal the district court’s order dismissing with 

prejudice their civil action for failure to properly serve 

Defendants, for lack of personal jurisdiction, and for failure 

to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. On appeal, 

we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants’ 

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Appellants’ informal 

brief does not challenge any aspect of the district court’s 

disposition, Appellants have forfeited appellate review of the 

court’s order. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-2356 Doc: 18 Filed: 03/31/2016 Pg: 2 of 2