Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00929/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00929-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL CARPENTER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0929 RRB EFB P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 28, 2006, the court dismissed plaintiff’s initial filing, explained

the pleading’s deficiencies, and gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting

those deficiencies. By orders filed September 13, 2006, November 14, 2006, December 27,

2006, February 22, 2007 and May 15, 2007, plaintiff was granted extension of time within which

to file an amended complaint. The May 15, 2007 order granted plaintiff one final extension of

twenty days. It also cautioned plaintiff that no further extensions of time would be granted and

that failure to timely file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed. 

////

////

Case 2:06-cv-00929-ODW Document 25 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The 20-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the order.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 20 days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: June 27, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00929-ODW Document 25 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 2