Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02261/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02261-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

Page 1 – Case No. 3:14-cv-02261

JOINT STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATION’S 

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP

DENNIS J. KELLY (SBN No. 191414) 

J. CROSS CREASON (SBN No. 209492) 

353 Sacramento Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 397-2700 

Facsimile: (415) 397-3300 

Attorneys for Defendant

SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MARGO PERRYMAN, on behalf of herself 

and others similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

vs. 

LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP; OCWEN 

LOAN SERVICING LLC; SOUTHWEST 

BUSINESS CORPORATION; AMERICAN 

SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, and 

DOES 1-100, inclusive 

 Defendants.

Case No. 3:14-cv-02261-JST

JOINT STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT 

SOUTHWEST BUSINESS 

CORPORATION’S RESPONSE TO 

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Date: TBD 

Time: TBD 

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Courtroom: 9, 19th Floor 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, 6-1 (b ), it is hereby stipulated by and between Southwest 

Business Corporation (“SWBC”) and plaintiff Margo Perryman (“Perryman”) through their 

respective attorneys, that: 

WHEREAS, on February 26, 2015, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), the Court 

dismissed Perryman’s First Amended Complaint as against SWBC, with leave to amend;

WHEREAS, on September 14, 2015, the Final Judgment was entered in Lee v. Ocwen 

Loan Servicing, LLC, Assurant Inc. and American Security Insurance Co., Case No. 0:14-60649-

JAL (S.D.Fla.) (“Lee”), which judgment enjoins Perryman from prosecuting her claims against 

certain defendants in this action; 

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 228 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 4
Page 2 – Case No. 3:14-cv-02261

JOINT STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATION’S 

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Perryman has filed a Notice of Appeal in Lee, and filed her opening appellate 

brief in the 11th Circuit on December 23, 2015; 

WHEREAS, on January 14, 2016 the United States District Court for the Southern District 

of New York preliminarily approved a class settlement in Lyons et al. v. Litton Loan Servicing LP 

et al., Case No. 1:13-cv-00513 (S.D.N.Y.) (“Lyons”), which preliminary approval order enjoins 

Perryman from prosecuting her claims against certain defendants in this action; 

WHEREAS, on January 15, 2016, Perryman filed a Second Amended Complaint (SAC), 

including claims against SWBC;

WHEREAS, SWBC intends to file a motion to stay this action as to SWBC pending final 

resolution of the settlement proceedings in Lee and Lyons;

WHEREAS, Perryman and SWBC agree that, SWBC’s time to respond to the SAC, should 

be extended until such date as the Court sets, if any, upon resolution of SWBC’s motion to stay; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject

 to the Court's approval:

• SWBC’s time to respond to the SAC shall be set by the Court upon resolution of SWBC’s 

motion to stay; and 

• This will not alter the existing deadlines for other defendants in this action.

 

SEEN AND AGREED:

Dated: January 28, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF SHERI L. KELLY

 By: _/s/Sheri L. Kelly________________ 

SHERI L. KELLY

slk@sherikellylaw.com 

31 E. Julian Street 

San Jose, CA 95112 

Telephone: (408) 287-7712 

Facsimile: (408) 583-4249 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Margo Perryman

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 228 Filed 01/29/16 Page 2 of 4
Page 3 – Case No. 3:14-cv-02261

JOINT STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATION’S 

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: January 28, 2016 DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP

 By: _/s/Dennis J. Kelly_______________ 

DENNIS J. KELLY

353 Sacramento Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 397-2700 

Facsimile: 415) 397-3300 

Attorney for Defendant Southwest Business 

Corporation 

FILER’S ATTESTATION

The undersigned filer attests, pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), that concurrence in the 

filing of the documents has been obtained from the other signatory to this document. 

 

Dated: January 28, 2016 DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP

 By: _/s/Dennis J. Kelly______________ 

353 Sacramento Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 397-2700 

Facsimile: 415) 397-3300 

Attorney for Defendant Southwest Business 

Corporation 

 

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 228 Filed 01/29/16 Page 3 of 4
Page 4 – Case No. 3:14-cv-02261

JOINT STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATION’S 

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

• SWBC’s time to respond to the SAC shall be set by the Court upon resolution of SWBC’s 

motion to stay; and

• This will not alter the existing deadlines for other defendants in this action.

Dated: January 29, 2016 

 ________________________________ 

The Honorable Jon S. Tigar

United States Judge 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 228 Filed 01/29/16 Page 4 of 4