Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-89-03033/USCOURTS-ca10-89-03033-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

.. 

CHARLES 

v. 

TERRY L. 

. FILED 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

Uoned States Court of A peajs 

T"'nth Circuit p 

JUL 13 7990 

RENTSCHLER, ) 

) 

Plaintiff-Appellant, ) 

) 

) 

) 

CAMPBELL, ) 

) 

Defendant-Appel lee. ) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Cleek 

No. 89-3033 

(D.C. No. 87-3201-S) 

( D. Kan. ) 

Before ANDERSON, BARRETT, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

Plaintiff has appealed from the district court's final 

judgment entered in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

We have, reviewed such record on appeal as is before us and the 

parties appellate briefs, and we find no error in the 

determinations plaintiff has challenged. Plaintiff has requested 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

t he case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36 .3. 

Appellate Case: 89-3033 Document: 010110038372 Date Filed: 07/13/1990 Page: 1 
that this court obtain a trial transcript at government expense. 

However, this appeal does not involve a "substantial question" 

and, therefore, such a transcript is not warranted. See 28 U.S.C 

§ 753(f). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court 

for the District of Kansas is AFFIRMED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 89-3033 Document: 010110038372 Date Filed: 07/13/1990 Page: 2