Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02356/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02356-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR ENE CASE NO. 06-2356 CW 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gregory G. Spaulding, Esq. (SB# 106606) 

Terry S. Sterling, Esq. (SB# 106379) 

SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP 

3550 Round Barn Boulevard, Suite 306 

P.O. Box 1867 

Santa Rosa, CA 95402 

Telephone: (707) 524-1900 

Facsimile: (707) 524-1906 

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SONOMA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BETTY GAIL IRWIN, surviving spouse heir-atlaw and personal representative of William 

Martin Irwin, deceased, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

COUNTY OF SONOMA, and DOES 1-20, 

 Defendants, 

Case No.: C 06-02356 CW 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR ENE 

This Stipulation is entered into by and between plaintiff BETTY GAIL IRWIN and 

defendant COUNTY OF SONOMA with reference to the following facts: 

At the September 8, 2006 Case Management Conference before the Honorable Claudia 

Wilkins, plaintiff’s counsel advised the Court that new defendants were going to be added to this 

case. Although Judge Wilkins set a November 30, 2006 deadline for the parties to conduct Early 

Neutral Evaluation, she advised counsel that the parties could request a continuance of that deadline 

by stipulation, if new parties were added. 

Plaintiff has submitted to this Court a Stipulation and Order Substituting Parties, seeking 

leave to substitute California Forensic Medical Group and Sutter Medical Center as defendants, in 

place of Does 1 and 2. Assuming that the Court approves the Stipulation, the new parties will need 

to be served, to appear, to join in the stipulation for ADR and to make their Initial Disclosures 

before a productive Early Neutral Evaluation can be held. For that reason, counsel for the parties 

Case 4:06-cv-02356-CW Document 14 Filed 09/27/06 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR ENE CASE NO. 06-2356 CW 

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

agree that the November 30, 2006 deadline for Early Neutral Evaluation should be continued for 90 

days. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto that the November 30, 

2006 deadline for Early Neutral Evaluation should be continued to February 28, 2007. 

DATED: September 21, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD SAX 

Attorneys for Plaintiff BETTY GAIL IRWIN 

By: /s/ Richard Sax 

 Richard Sax 

DATED: September 21, 2006 SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP 

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SONOMA 

By: /s/ Terry S. Sterling 

 Terry S. Sterling 

Case 4:06-cv-02356-CW Document 14 Filed 09/27/06 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR ENE CASE NO. 06-2356 CW 

3

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 ORDER 

This Court, having read and considered the Stipulation set forth above, and good cause 

appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the November 30, 2006 deadline for Early Neutral 

Evaluation is continued to February 28, 2007. 

 9/27 /s/ CLAUDIA WILKEN 

DATED: , 2006 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:06-cv-02356-CW Document 14 Filed 09/27/06 Page 3 of 3