Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00108/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00108-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

M.O. ADOPTING FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS - 1

2:03-CV-0108-RRB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 PEAY v. LAMARQUE 

DATE: October 16, 2007 CASE NO. 2:03-CV-0108-RRB 

THE HONORABLE RALPH R. BEISTLINE

PROCEEDINGS: MINUTE ORDER FROM CHAMBERS

ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Petitioner Timothy Peay ("Petitioner"), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 21, 2006, Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds filed

Findings and Recommendations (Docket 13) herein which were served

on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed

within twenty days. Petitioner has filed Objections to the

Magistrate's Findings and Recommendations at Docket 20. 

Inasmuch as the Court concludes the issues before it are

based in law, i.e., legal disputes, and in accordance with the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, the

Court has conducted a de novo review of the relevant pleadings

filed in this matter. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds the Magistrate's Amended Findings and

Recommendations (Docket 13) to be supported by the record and by

Case 2:03-cv-00108-RRB-EFB Document 25 Filed 10/16/07 Page 1 of 2
M.O. ADOPTING FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS - 2

2:03-CV-0108-RRB

proper analysis. It is clear that Petitioner’s surrender to the

United States by Canadian authorities was unconditional and that

therefore Petitioner’s subsequent sentence was not in violation of

the extradition treaty between Canada and the United States of

America.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations (Docket 13) filed

on April 21, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus

is denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 2:03-cv-00108-RRB-EFB Document 25 Filed 10/16/07 Page 2 of 2