Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00280/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00280-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT TUNSTALL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0280 LKK CMK P

vs.

J. YENTES, et al., 

Defendants.

 / ORDER

By order filed September 28, 2006, the district judge adopted the magistrate

judge’s Findings and Recommendations in part, but declined to adopt the recommendation

granting summary judgment on the due process claim. This case was remanded to the magistrate

judge for further proceedings consistent with this order. 

In light of the September 28, 2006 order, the court will grant the parties the

opportunity to present additional briefing, limited to the following issue: whether plaintiff would

have been subject to discipline even if it were clearly established that he was experiencing an

actual seizure at the time of his disruptive behavior. 

///

///

///

Case 2:05-cv-00280-LKK -CMK Document 60 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Within sixty days the parties may file additional briefing on the above

mentioned issue. 

2. Responses to any additional briefing shall be filed within fifteen days of the

date the additional briefing is filed. 

 DATED: November 20, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00280-LKK -CMK Document 60 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 2