Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01486/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01486-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

KURT A. DIDIER

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2750

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID AND LINDA SINGLETON,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

FAF, INC. & RUTH ANN HAYDEN,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 2:04-cv-01486-FCD-DAD

ORDER MODIFYING

STATUS(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

ORDER 

Defendant the United States of America hereby moves for an

order modifying the Scheduling Order as follows: the United

States’ Expert (Damages) Disclosure Due Date is extended to March

16, 2007 from the current deadline of January 26, 2007. The

United States requests the extension because Plaintiff David

Singleton is out-of-town and thus unavailable for medical

examination by Defendant’s neuro-psychologist and neuroophthalmologist until the middle of February, 2007. An earlier

examination was not possible because Counsel for Plaintiff and

the United States have been attempting to resolve certain

differences pertaining to the scope of the medical examinations. 

Case 2:04-cv-01486-FCD-DAD Document 55 Filed 01/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The United States agrees to make its experts available for

deposition following their examination of Plaintiff and

preparation of their reports. It will not oppose the extension

of the date for supplemental expert witness disclosure or for the

closures of discovery (damages). The Scheduling Order will

otherwise remain unchanged.

Counsel for Plaintiff and defendants FAF, Inc. and Ruth Ann

Hayden do not oppose this motion. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 12, 2007 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: ________________________________

KURT A. DIDIER

ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2007

Case 2:04-cv-01486-FCD-DAD Document 55 Filed 01/17/07 Page 2 of 2