Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-04940/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-04940-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF FAC BY PLAINTIFF: CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04940-MMC 

Sanjay S. Schmidt (SBN 247475) 

LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 

1388 Sutter Street, Suite 810 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

Telephone: (415) 563-8583 

Facsimile: (415) 223-9717 

Email: ss@sanjayschmidtlaw.com 

Steven L. Derby, Esq. (SBN 148372) 

Anthony E. Goldsmith, Esq. (SBN 125621) 

DERBY McGUINNESS & GOLDSMITH LLP 

200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 987-8778 

Facsimile: (510) 359-4419 

Email: info@dmglawfirm.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

SWAMI SHRADDHANANDA SARASWATI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SWAMI SHRADDHANANDA 

SARASWATI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF ALBANY, PACIFIC GAS & 

ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California 

registered domestic stock corporation, 

FRANK L. YEE, MAY L. YEE, and DOES 

1-00, Inclusive, 

Defendants. 

AND RELATED CROSS ACTION 

Case No. 3:17-cv-04940-MMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING THE FILING 

OF A FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT BY PLAINTIFF 

Plaintiff SWAMI SHRADDHANANDA SARASWATI (“Plaintiff”), Defendant CITY 

OF ALBANY, Defendant PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (“PG&E”), and 

Defendants FRANK L. YEE AND MAY L. YEE, by and through their respective counsel, hereby 

Case 3:17-cv-04940-MMC Document 49 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF FAC BY PLAINTIFF: CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04940-MMC 

respectfully submit the following stipulation and proposed order regarding Plaintiff’s stated 

intention to file a First Amended Complaint: 

1. Plaintiff seeks to amend her Complaint; 

2. Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2), Plaintiff has met-and-conferred with counsel for all 

Defendants – to ascertain whether the opposing parties would consent, or if a motion 

would be required – and has provided counsel a copy of the proposed First Amended 

Complaint (“FAC”), with “redlined” changes; 

3. Having had the opportunity to review the proposed FAC, counsel for the opposing 

parties consent to the filing of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, a redlined copy 

(reflecting the changes) of which is attached hereto, as Exhibit 1, and a standard (nonredlined) copy of which is attached hereto, as Exhibit 2; 

4. Defendants do not stipulate that any matter in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is 

correct. Defendants only stipulate that Plaintiff does not need to file a motion for leave 

to file the First Amended Complaint, and therefore Defendants stipulate that Plaintiff 

may file said First Amended Complaint. 

5. Based on the foregoing, the parties hereby respectfully stipulate to the filing of 

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, and request that the Court grant the Order 

below, permitting the filing of the FAC. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

Dated: November 12, 2018 LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 

 /s/ Sanjay S. Schmidt 

 By: SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: November 12, 2018 DERBY McGUINNESS & GOLDSMITH LLP 

 /s/ Anthony E. Goldsmith 

 By: ANTHONY E. GOLDSMITH 

Case 3:17-cv-04940-MMC Document 49 Filed 11/19/18 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF FAC BY PLAINTIFF: CASE NO. 3:17-CV-04940-MMC 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: November 12, 2018 GOUGH & HANCOCK LLP 

/s/ Gregory Read∗

 

 By: GREGORY READ 

GAYLE L. GOUGH 

SARA N. DUNCAN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 

Dated: November 12, 2018 CLARK HILL LLP 

/s/ Sara Allman∗

 

 By: SARA B. ALLMAN 

MATTHEW T. BRAND 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF ALBANY 

Dated: November 12, 2018 HARTSUYKER, STRATMAN & WILLIAMSABREGO 

/s/ Nairi Paterson∗

 

 By: NAIRI PATERSON 

Attorneys for Defendants 

FRANK L. YEE AND MAY L. YEE 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. Plaintiff shall file her First Amended Complaint within 4-days of the date of this 

Order. 

Dated: _______________ _______________________________ 

 Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

∗

 Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i) of the Civil Local Rules, the filer of this document hereby attests that concurrence in the 

filing of this document was obtained from each of the other Signatories. 

∗

 Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i) of the Civil Local Rules, the filer of this document hereby attests that concurrence in the 

filing of this document was obtained from each of the other Signatories. ∗

 Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i) of the Civil Local Rules, the filer of this document hereby attests that concurrence in the 

filing of this document was obtained from each of the other Signatories. 

November 19, 2018 _______________________________

Hon Maxine M Chesney

Case 3:17-cv-04940-MMC Document 49 Filed 11/19/18 Page 3 of 3