Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-01365/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-01365-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARNESHA M. GARNER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant. /

No. C 08-1365 CW

ORDER SUSTAINING

DEFENDANT’S

OBJECTION TO

DISCOVERY ORDER

Defendant has filed an objection to Magistrate Judge Chen’s

order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff’s motion for a

protective order. The magistrate judge did not commit clear error

in ruling that the actual sales price information sought in

Defendant’s subpoena to the Department of Motor Vehicles falls

outside the scope of the discovery permitted under the Court’s

earlier order. However, to the extent the requested information is

available, it will inform the appraisal ordered by the Court. For

this reason, the Court will permit discovery of the information. 

Accordingly, Defendant’s objection is SUSTAINED and Plaintiff’s

motion for a protective order is DENIED with respect to the actual

Case 4:08-cv-01365-CW Document 73 Filed 08/12/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

sales price information Defendant seeks from the DMV.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 8/12/08 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

cc: EMC

Case 4:08-cv-01365-CW Document 73 Filed 08/12/08 Page 2 of 2