Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00274/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00274-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALAN PERRY, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00274-REC-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 11)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff Alan Perry (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 19, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:05-cv-00274-LJO -SMS Document 14 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 19,

2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s complaint,

filed February 25, 2005, against defendants Frye and Mayfield for

failing to protect plaintiff, in violation of the Eighth

Amendment;

3. Plaintiff’s claim against defendant Frye based on

verbal harassment and verbal abuse is DISMISSED for failure to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section

1983; and,

4. Defendants Ahlin and Silva, and the claims against

them, are DISMISSED from this action for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted under section 1983.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 11, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00274-LJO -SMS Document 14 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2