Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01969/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01969-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1 LEATHERBURY v. C&H SUGAR et al.

U.S. DISTRICT COURT CASE 10-10969

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CMC HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kenneth N. Frucht, (SBN 178881) 

Frederick J. Geonetta (SBN 114824)

GEONETTA & FRUCHT LLP

100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel: (415) 392-4844 

Fax: (415) 392-7973 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GLENN LEATHERBURY

Steven R. Blackburn, State Bar No. 154797

Matthew A. Goodin, State Bar No. 169674

Brooke A. Brown, State Bar No. 242815

EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.

One California Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-5427

Telephone: 415.398.3500

Facsimile: 415.398.0955

sblackburn@ebglaw.com

mgoodin@ebglaw.com

bbrown@ebglaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants,

C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC. and

AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GLEN LEATHERBURY an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CV 10-01969 VRW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO 

AUGUST 26, 2010

The Initial Case Management Conference was scheduled to take place on August 12, 2010 

at 3:30 p.m. On August 11, 2010, the parties received an email from the Court indicating that the 

Case 3:10-cv-01969-SI Document 20 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 2
2 LEATHERBURY v. C&H SUGAR et al.

U.S. DISTRICT COURT CASE 10-10969

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CMC HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

time for the hearing was changed to 10:00 a.m. on August 12, 2010. The Court also indicated that 

that parties could stipulate to a continuance if the new time did not work. The new hearing time 

presents a conflict for Plaintiff’s counsel. Therefore, the parties, by and through their respective 

counsel, hereby stipulate to a continuance of the Initial Case Management Conference to August 

26, 2010 at 3:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as may be heard by this Court.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Initial Case Management Conference is continued

from August 12, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. to August 26, 2010 at 3:30 p.m. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________________, 2010

 

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker

Chief Judge of the United States District Court

Dated: August 11, 2010 By: /s/ Kenneth Frucht_________________

Kenneth Frucht

GEONETTA & FRUCHT LLP

Dated: August 11, 2010 By: /s/ Brooke Brown_________________

Brooke Brown

EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. 

August 11 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:10-cv-01969-SI Document 20 Filed 08/11/10 Page 2 of 2