Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02661/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02661-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

Stipulation to Extend Time To Answer Corrected Third Amended Complaint; Case No. C-01-2661-MMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

JONATHAN C. DICKEY, SBN 088226 

PAUL J. COLLINS, SBN 187709

REBECCA JUSTICE LAZARUS, SBN 227330

1881 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 849-5300 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 

Attorneys for Defendants 

GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., MERRILL LYNCH 

& CO., MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER, 

AND J.P. MORGAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN re EXODUS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION, 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

CASE NO. C-01-2661-MMC 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

ANSWER CORRECTED THIRD 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

WHEREAS the Corrected Third Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) in the above-captioned 

action was filed on April 29, 2005 and electronically served on that date;

WHEREAS the Court issued an Order on April 18, 2005 deeming the defendants’ pending 

motions to dismiss applicable to the Complaint; 

WHEREAS the Court issued an order on August 5, 2005 dismissing some of the claims 

asserted against the Underwriter Defendants in the Complaint and instructing the Underwriter 

Defendants to answer the Complaint by September 6, 2005; 

 WHEREAS on August 30, 2005, the Underwriter Defendants filed a motion for 

reconsideration or, in the alternative, for clarification of the August 5, 2005 Order and, on September 

12, 2005, the Court denied the Underwriter Defendants’ motion; and 

WHEREAS the Underwriter Defendants’ answer to the Corrected Third Amended Complaint 

currently must be filed on or before September 15, 2005, which is within three days of the Court’s 

September 12, 2005 Order; and 

Case 3:01-cv-02661-MMC Document 265 Filed 09/13/05 Page 1 of 2
 2 

Stipulation to Extend Time To Answer Corrected Third Amended Complaint; Case No. C-01-2661-MMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

WHEREAS the parties have stipulated to extend the time for the Underwriter Defendants to 

answer the Complaint in this action through and including October 3, 2005; 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE, and request the Court to 

order, as follows: 

The Underwriter Defendants shall have to and including October 3, 2005 within which to file 

an answer to the Complaint. 

DATED: September 12, 2005 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By: /s:/ Paul J. Collins 

Paul J. Collins

Attorneys for Defendants 

GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., MERRILL LYNCH & 

CO., MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER, AND 

J.P. MORGAN 

DATED: September 12, 2005 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & 

ROBBINS LLP 

By: /s:/ John K. Grant 

John K. Grant

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

The Underwriter Defendants’ time within which to answer the Corrected Third Amended 

Complaint is hereby extended to and including October 3, 2005. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

September 13, 2005

Case 3:01-cv-02661-MMC Document 265 Filed 09/13/05 Page 2 of 2