Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04852/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04852-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [] SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C 06-4852 RMW 1

Robert S. Green (State Bar No. 136183)

Jenelle Welling (State Bar No. 209480)

Brian S. Umpierre (State Bar No. 236399)

GREEN WELLING LLP

595 Market Street, Suite 2750

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 477-6700

Facsimile: (415) 477-6710

Liaison and Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

Christine G. Pedigo

FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON & LOUGHRAN

601 Montgomery St., Suite 665

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-8700

Facsimile: (415) 398-8704

Christopher Lovell

Merrick S. Rayle

LOVELL STUART HALEBIAN LLP

212 Wood St.

Pacific Grove, CA 93950

Telephone: (831) 333-0309

Facsimile: (831) 333-0325

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE RAMBUS 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

All Actions 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 06-4852 RMW

STIPULATION AND 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

On October 18, 2006, this Court entered an Order consolidating five related antitrust

actions on behalf of consumers of assorted types of DRAM technology against Defendant

Rambus, Inc. (“Rambus”) into In re Rambus Antitrust Litigation, Civil Action No. C 06-4852

Case 5:06-cv-04852-RMW Document 17 Filed 12/07/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [] SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C 06-4852 RMW 2

RMW, for all purposes, including pretrial proceedings, trial, and appeal (the “Consolidation

Order”);

The Consolidation Order provides for filing and service of Plaintiffs' Consolidated

Complaint 75 days from the entry of the Consolidation Order, which falls on January 2, 2007;

The Consolidation Order provides that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to

the Consolidated Complaint no later than 75 days from the date of service;

Plaintiffs and Defendant, after meeting and conferring, agree that the interests of the

parties are better served by extending the date for the filing and service of Plaintiffs’

Consolidated Complaint and Defendant’s response thereto;

THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiffs and Defendant,

through their respective counsel of record, as follows:

1. Plaintiffs deadline for the filing and service of their Consolidated Complaint is 

extended from January 2, 2006 to January 15, 2006.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: November __, 2006 GREEN WELLING LLP

By: /s/

Robert S. Green

Jenelle Welling

Brian S. Umpierre

595 Market Street, Suite 2750

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 477-6700

Facsimile: (415) 477-6710 

Liaison and Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

Christine G. Pedigo

FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON & LOUGHRAN

601 Montgomery St., Suite 665

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-8700

Facsimile: (415) 398-8704

Case 5:06-cv-04852-RMW Document 17 Filed 12/07/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [] SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C 06-4852 RMW 3

Christopher Lovell

Merrick S. Rayle

LOVELL STUART HALEBIAN LLP

212 Wood St.

Pacific Grove, CA 93950

Telephone: (831) 333-0309

Facsimile: (831) 333-0325

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

DATED: November __, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

By: /s/

Maura L. Rees

650 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050

Telephone: (650) 493-9300

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __________ ________________________________

THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I, Robert S. Green, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to

file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER. In compliance with

General Order 45(X), I hereby attest that Maura L. Rees has concurred in this filing.

Dated: November 16, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

GREEN WELLING LLP

By: /s/

Robert S. Green

Case 5:06-cv-04852-RMW Document 17 Filed 12/07/06 Page 3 of 3