Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05056/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05056-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 06-05056 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING 

ADR PROCESS 

DM_US:20229113 

HOWREY LLP

Benjamin K. Riley (112007) 

Matthew F. Greinert (239492) 

HOWREY LLP 

525 Market Street, Suite 3600 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 848-4900 

Facsimile: (415) 848-4999 

rileyb@howrey.com

greinertm@howrey.com 

Attorneys for Defendant/ 

Counterclaimant/Third-Party 

Plaintiff 

DICON FIBEROPTICS, INC. 

Lawrence E. Butler (111043) 

Krista L. Mitzel (221002) 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

lbutler@seyfarth.com 

kmitzel@seyfarth.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

ALCATEL-LUCENT 

Stephen G. Schrey (62680) 

Marcie A. Keenan (177939) 

NIXON PEABODY LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2700 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3996 

Telephone: (415) 984-8200 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8300 

sschrey@nixonpeabody.com 

mkeenan@nixonpeabody.com 

Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant 

SOLECTRON CORPORATION, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ALCATEL-LUCENT, 

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, 

vs. 

DICON FIBEROPTICS, INC., 

Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. 

DICON FIBEROPTICS, INC., 

Third-Party Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SOLECTRON COPRORATION, INC, 

Third-Party Defendant. 

Case No. C 06-05056 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Case 4:06-cv-05056-PJH Document 38 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 06-05056 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING 

ADR PROCESS 

-2- 

DM_US:20229113 

HOWREY LLP

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes: 

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR 

phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone 

Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process: 

X Private ADR (please identify process and provider) 

Mediation, Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (“JAMS”)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

X other requested deadline: May 31, 2007 

Case 4:06-cv-05056-PJH Document 38 Filed 02/23/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 06-05056 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING 

ADR PROCESS 

-3- 

DM_US:20229113 

HOWREY LLP

Dated: February 22, 2007 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

By: ____/s/ Krista L. Mitzel

Lawrence E. Butler 

Krista L. Mitzel 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

ALCATEL-LUCENT 

Dated: February 22, 2007 HOWREY LLP 

By: ____/s/ Matthew F. Greinert

Benjamin K. Riley 

Matthew F. Greinert 

Attorneys for 

Defendant/Counterclaimant/Third-Party 

Plaintiff 

DICON FIBEROPTICS, INC. 

Dated: February 22, 2007 NIXON PEABODY LLP 

By: /s/ Marcie A. Keenan

Stephen G. Schrey 

Marcie A. Keenan 

Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant 

SOLECTRON CORPORATION, INC. 

Case 4:06-cv-05056-PJH Document 38 Filed 02/23/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 06-05056 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING 

ADR PROCESS 

DM_US:20229113 

HOWREY LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the stipulation above, Case No: C 06-05056 is hereby referred to: 

 Non-binding Arbitration 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 

 Mediation 

X Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session 

 90 days from the date of this order 

X Other: May 31, 2007

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

 United States District Judge 

2/23/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-05056-PJH Document 38 Filed 02/23/07 Page 4 of 4