Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01225/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01225-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1225 LKK GGH P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On April 26, 2006, plaintiff filed a document titled “Objections to Order Denying

Counsel.” The court construes this document as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed April 12, 2006, denying his motion for appointment of counsel

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be

upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court

finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary

to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed April 12, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: September 28, 2006

 

wo1225.rec UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01225-MCE-AC Document 106 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 1