Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-03511/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-03511-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION & ORDER RE MOTION TO STRIKE - Mandel v. CSU, 3:17-cv-03511-WHO - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mark Allen Kleiman (SBN 115919) 

LAW OFFICE OF MARK ALLEN KLEIMAN 

2907 Stanford Ave 

Venice, Ca 90292

Telephone: 310/306-8094 

Telefax: 310/306-8491 

Email: mkleiman@quitam.org 

Alan F. Hunter, Esq. SBI 099805

Elizabeth G. Landess, Esq. (SBI 138353)

GAVIN CUNNINGHAM & HUNTER 

1530 The Alameda, Suite 210 

San Jose, California 95126 

Email: hunter@gclitigation.com

Telephone: 408/294-8500 

Telefax: 408/294-8596 

Email: hunter@gclitigation.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Rabab Abdulhadi 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 

DIVISION 

JACOB MANDEL, CHARLES VOLK, et 

al., 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the 

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 

SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY,

et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 3:17-cv-03511-WHO

STIPULATION & ORDER 

RE MOTION TO STRIKE

Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick III

Dept: Courtroom 2, 17th Floor

Date: November 8, 2017

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Case 3:17-cv-03511-WHO Document 74 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 3
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION & ORDER RE MOTION TO STRIKE - Mandel v. CSU, 3:17-cv-03511-WHO - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION 

Defendant Rabab Abdulhadi (“Dr. Abdulhadi”) and Plaintiffs Jacob Mandel, 

Charles Volk, Liam Kern, Masha Merkulova, Aaron Parker, and Stephanie Rosekind 

(“Plaintiffs”) through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows pursuant to Local Rule 

6-2. 

 Whereas on August 29, 2017, this Court entered an Order (ECF 50) based on a 

Stipulation between Plaintiffs and Dr. Abdulhadi and all other defendants, setting forth a 

new briefing schedule based upon Plaintiffs’ (then) to-be filed First Amended Complaint. 

 Whereas on August 31, 2017 Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint (ECF 

57). 

Whereas the Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint at Paragraph 43, page ten, lines 

9-27 contains the exact language Dr. Abdulhadi previously moved to strike from the 

original complaint, (the “Motion to Strike,” ECF 44). 

 Dr. Abdulhadi and the Plaintiffs agree that although both the Plaintiffs’ 

original Complaint and Dr. Abdulhadi’s Motion to Strike Allegations of 

Complaint are moot, Dr. Abdulhadi’s Motion to Strike will be deemed to apply 

to the same language in the Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, at which it 

had been directed in the original Complaint, and need not be refiled.

 Consistent with the Court’s August 29, 2017 Order (ECF 50), Dr. Abdulhadi 

and the Plaintiffs agree that Plaintiffs’ opposition to Dr. Abdulhadi’s Motion to 

Strike shall be filed no later than October 11, 2017, and that Dr. Abdulhadi’s 

Case 3:17-cv-03511-WHO Document 74 Filed 09/06/17 Page 2 of 3
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION & ORDER RE MOTION TO STRIKE - Mandel v. CSU, 3:17-cv-03511-WHO - 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

reply brief in support of the Motion to Strike shall be filed no later than 

October 25, 2017. 

 Dr. Abdulhadi and Plaintiffs agree that Dr. Abdulhadi’s Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiffs’ original complaint (ECF 43) is moot, and that Dr. Abdulhadi may 

file a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint no later than September 

14, 2017. 

To the extent the Proposed Order adopting this Stipulation is denied, Dr. 

Abdulhadi and Plaintiffs agree that Plaintiffs will have 7 calendar days from the date of 

that denial to file an opposition to the Motion to Strike.

 GAVIN CUNNINGHAM & HUNTER 

Dated: September 5, 2017 By: /s/ Alan F. Hunter 

 Alan F. Hunter – Attorneys for Def.

 Authorized E-Signature 

 

 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

Dated: September 5, 2017 By: /s/ Seth Weisburst 

 Seth Weisburst – Attorneys for Plts.

 Authorized E-Signature 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________ 

 __________________________________ 

 United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-03511-WHO Document 74 Filed 09/06/17 Page 3 of 3