Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05646/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05646-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDALL E. ELLIS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

STEVEN CAMBRA, JR., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:02-cv-05646-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND GRANTING

MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN

CLAIMS FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

(Docs. 73 and 79)

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT DREW

TO FILE RESPONSE TO THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

Plaintiff Randall E. Ellis (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 23, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. To date,

the parties have not filed any objection to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:02-cv-05646-AWI -SKO Document 80 Filed 12/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of

this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the

record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 23, 2006,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss, filed March 27,

2006, is GRANTED;

3. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Galaza, Bendon, and

Van Zandt are DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on plaintiff’s

failure to exhaust; and,

4. Defendant Drew shall file a response to plaintiff’s third

amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of service

of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05646-AWI -SKO Document 80 Filed 12/13/06 Page 2 of 2