Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01539/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01539-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

Case No. 14-cv-01539-NC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER CASTRO,

Plaintiff,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No.14-cv-01539-NC 

ORDER DENYING PROPOSED 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 

ORDER

On November 18, 2014, JPMorgan filed a declaration in support of an attached 

proposed protective order. Dkt. No. 33. After review, the Court denies the proposed 

protective order. The proposed protective order is missing important pieces. For instance, 

it fails to outline a process for challenging confidentiality designations.

The Court orders the parties to file a new proposed stipulated protective order

within the next seven days. The parties must use as a starting point the Northern District’s 

model stipulated protective order, which can be found on the Court’s website (“Stipulated 

Protective Order for Standard Litigation”). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 15, 2015 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-01539-NC Document 38 Filed 01/15/15 Page 1 of 1