Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00413/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00413-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 12:1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALVARDO C. HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-09-0413 MCE GGH

vs.

MICHAEL A. MADRIGAL, JR., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

__________________________________/

On January 28, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:09-cv-00413-MCE -GGH Document 59 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 28, 2010, are ADOPTED;

and

2. Plaintiff’s application for entry of default judgment is DENIED.

Dated: March 15, 2010

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:09-cv-00413-MCE -GGH Document 59 Filed 03/16/10 Page 2 of 2