Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-03587/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-03587-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL - 1 - CASE NO. C 13-3587 DMR

ANNE M. ROGASKI (State Bar No. 184754) 

arogaski@kilpatricktownsend.com 

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

1080 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: 650-326-2400 

Facsimile: 650-326-2422 

ROBERT D. TADLOCK (State Bar No. 238479) 

rtadlock@kilpatricktownsend.com 

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415-576-0200 

Facsimile: 415-576-0300 

JEFFREY M. CONNOR (pro hac vice) 

jmconnor@kilpatricktownsend.com 

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600 

Denver, CO 80202 

Telephone: 303-571-4000 

Facsimile: 303-571-4321 

Attorneys for Defendant YELP INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

YELP INC., 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. C 13-3587 DMR

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

PORTIONS OF DEFENDANT’S REPLY 

IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR 

STAY PENDING INTER PARTES 

REVIEW 

Case 5:13-cv-03587-RMW Document 106 Filed 12/17/13 Page 1 of 2 Case4:13-cv-03587-DMR Document95-2 Filed12/02/13 Page1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL - 1 - 

CASE NO. C 13-3587 DMR

Now before the Court is Defendant’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of 

Defendant’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (“Defendant’s 

Administrative Motion”). Upon consideration of Defendant’s Administrative Motion and the 

supporting declaration of Jeffrey M. Connor filed therewith, the Court finds there to be good cause 

for granting Defendant’s request to file the below-referenced document under seal.

GOOD CAUSE having been shown, the Court finds that: 

1. Plaintiff possesses an overriding confidentiality interest that overcomes the right of 

public access to the record in the following document or portions thereof: 

Document Portion to be Sealed 

Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion for 

Stay Pending Inter Partes Review

Redacted Portions Thereof 

2. Plaintiff’s confidentiality interests support sealing the record;

3. A substantial probability exists that Plaintiff’s overriding confidentiality interests 

will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; 

4. The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and 

5. No less restrictive means exists to achieve this overriding interest.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Administrative Motion to File Under 

Seal Portions of Defendant’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Stay Pending Inter Partes Review 

is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: December 17, 2013__ 

 Honorable Donna M. Ryu 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 5:13-cv-03587-RMW Document 106 Filed 12/17/13 Page 2 of 2 Case4:13-cv-03587-DMR Document95-2 Filed12/02/13 Page2 of 2