Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04681/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04681-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:25 Clayton Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - CASE NO. 06-04681-JSW

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

EDWARD D. JOHNSON (SBN 189475) 

SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 205584) 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 331-4557 wjohnson@mayerbrownrowe.com

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

RICHARD J. FAVRETTO 

1909 K Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Telephone: (202) 263-3000 

Facsimile: (202) 263-3300 rfavretto@mayerbrownrowe.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. and 

UAL CORP. 

Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ERIN L. DAVIS, individually and 

on behalf of all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC, VIRGIN 

ATLANTIC AIRWAYS, LTD., AMR 

CORP., AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., 

UAL CORP., and UNITED AIR LINES, 

INC., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. CV 06-04681-JSW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Erin L. Davis and Defendants British 

Airways Plc, Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd., AMR Corp., American Airlines, Inc., 

UAL Corp., and United Air Lines, Inc. respectfully request that this Court enter an 

order extending the time in which Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to 

Case 3:06-cv-04681-CRB Document 5 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - CASE NO. 06-04681-JSW

this matter until the later of (1) the date when the Defendant would otherwise be 

required to file a response pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, or (2) 45 

days after the JPML rules on a motion pending in In re International Air 

Transportation Surcharge Antitrust Litigation (MDL No. 1793) and a consolidated 

complaint is filed by all Plaintiffs in the single transferee Court and served on the 

Defendant. Plaintiff Erin L. Davis has consented to the requested extension. In 

support of this stipulation, the parties state: 

1. The Complaint in this matter was filed on August 1, 2006. It seeks 

relief under the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act against six defendants on behalf of 

a putative class. 

2. Nearly 81 similar actions have been filed in various jurisdictions around 

the country. 

3. There is a motion pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict 

Litigation (“JPML”) to consolidate and transfer actions like this one to a single 

venue. The JPML is considering this motion to consolidate in a matter captioned In 

re Passenger Air Transportation Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1793. 

4. The parties have agreed that this stipulation does not constitute a waiver 

of any defenses, including but not limited to, the defenses of lack of personal 

jurisdiction, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or improper venue. The Defendants 

expressly reserve their right to raise all defenses in response to either the current 

complaint or any consolidated amended complaint that may subsequently be filed 

relating to this action. 

THEREFORE, the parties request that this Court order that the time in which 

Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to this matter is the later of (1) the 

date when the Defendant would otherwise be required to file a response pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, or (2) 45 days after the JPML rules on a motion 

pending in In re Passenger Air Transportation Surcharge Antitrust Litigation (MDL 

Case 3:06-cv-04681-CRB Document 5 Filed 08/07/06 Page 2 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - CASE NO. 06-04681-JSW

No. 1793), and a consolidated complaint is filed by Plaintiffs in the single transferee 

Court and served on the Defendant. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: August 4, 2006 THE FURTH FIRM, LLP 

 /s/ 

 Michael P. Lehmann (SBN 77152) 

 Jon T. King (SBN 205073) 

 225 Bush Street, 15th Floor 

 San Francisco, CA 94104-4249 

 T: (415) 433-2070 

 F: (415) 982-2076 

Dated: August 4, 2006 MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

 /s/ 

Edward D. Johnson (SBN 189475) 

 Two Palo Alto Square, Suite. 300 

 3000 El Camino Real 

 Palo Alto, CA 94306 

 T: (650) 331-2000 

 F: (650) 331-4537 

 Richard J. Favretto 

 MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

 1909 K Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20006 

Attorneys for Defendants United Air Lines, 

Inc. and UAL Corporation 

Case 3:06-cv-04681-CRB Document 5 Filed 08/07/06 Page 3 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -4- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - CASE NO. 06-04681-JSW

Dated: August 4, 2006 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

 /s/ 

Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) 

 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

 1870 Embarcadero Road 

 Palo Alto, CA 94303 

 T: (650) 461-5600 

 F: (650) 461-5700 

 Daryl A. Libow

 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

 1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

 Washington, DC 20006 

 T: (202) 956-7500 

 F: (202) 293-6330 

 

 Attorneys for Defendant British Airways Plc 

Dated: August 4, 2006 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

 /s/ 

Charles E. Koob (SBN 47349) 

 Harrison J. Frahn (SBN 206822) 

 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

 2550 Hanover Street 

 Palo Alto, CA 94304 

 T: (650) 251-5000 

 F: (650) 251-5002 

Attorneys for Defendant Virgin Atlantic 

Airways Limited 

Case 3:06-cv-04681-CRB Document 5 Filed 08/07/06 Page 4 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -5- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - CASE NO. 06-04681-JSW

Dated: August 4, 2006 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

 /s/ 

Gayle E. Rosenstein (SBN 237975) 

 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

 Silicon Valley Office 

 201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

 T: (650) 802-3000 

 F: (650) 802-3100 

Attorneys for Defendants AMR Corporation 

and American Airlines, Inc.

 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

 Dated: 

 ____________________________ 

Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

August 7, 2006 

Case 3:06-cv-04681-CRB Document 5 Filed 08/07/06 Page 5 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -7- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - CASE NO. 06-04681-JSW

Gayle E. Rosenstein 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Silicon Valley Office 

201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Redwood Shores, California 94065 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of 

America that the above is true and correct. 

Executed on August 4, 2006, at Palo Alto, California. 

/s/ Jessica F. Davis 

Case 3:06-cv-04681-CRB Document 5 Filed 08/07/06 Page 6 of 6