Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01299/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01299-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAHN G. THOMPSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., )

)

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1:07-cv-01299-LJO-GSA-PC

 

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO RESERVE SECOND INFORMATIONAL

ORDER WITH RAND NOTICE ON

PLAINTIFF

(Doc. 35-1.)

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On September 27, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to dismissthis action for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. (Doc. 52.) By this motion, Defendants seek to dismiss this action in its

entirety. 

On June 6, 2011, the Court issued the Second Informational Order, Motion to Dismiss Notice,

and Summary Judgment Notice in this action, providing Plaintiff with notice pursuant to Rand v.

Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), advising Plaintiff of his rights and responsibilities to oppose a

motion to dismisssuch as that filed by Defendants in this action. (Doc. 35-1.) At this juncture, Plaintiff

shall be provided with another copy of the Order/Notice. Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548, 09-16113,

2012 WL 2626912 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012). Plaintiff is advised to immediately review the Order/Notice

in its entirety for information pertaining to his opposition to Defendants' pending motion to dismiss. 

///

Case 1:07-cv-01299-LJO-GSA Document 75 Filed 07/10/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve another copy of the Second

Informational Order, Motion to Dismiss Notice and Summary Judgment Notice (Doc. 35-1) upon

Plaintiff, for his review.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 9, 2012 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01299-LJO-GSA Document 75 Filed 07/10/12 Page 2 of 2