Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02141/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02141-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Soilworks, LLC, an Arizona corporation, 

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant/

Counterclaimant, 

vs.

Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc., an Ohio

corporation authorized to do business in

Arizona, 

Defendant/Counterclaimant/

Counterdefendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-2141-PHX-DGC

ORDER

On August 7, 2008, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part the

parties’ motions for summary judgment. Dkt. #94; see Dkt. ##78-79. Midwest has filed a

motion for clarification of that order. Dkt. #97.

In summarizing its rulings, the Court stated that “[s]ummary judgment is denied with

respect to Midwest’s claims for a declaratory judgment that Soilworks infringes the ‘266 and

‘270 Patents.” Dkt. #94 at 24-25, ¶ 1(h). Midwest seeks clarification that “it is Soilworks’

summary judgment motion that is denied” with respect to Midwest’s claims for infringement.

Dkt. #97 at 3-4 (emphasis in original).

As Midwest correctly notes in its motion, it did not seek summary judgment on its

infringement claims. Id. at 3 (citing Dkt. #78 at 3 n.1). Midwest is therefore correct in

concluding that when the Court denied summary judgment with respect to Midwest’s

Case 2:06-cv-02141-DGC Document 98 Filed 09/05/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

infringement claims, it was denying Soilworks’ request for summary judgment. See Dkt. #94

at 22-23.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Midwest’s motion for clarification (Dkt. #97) is granted.

2. In its August 7, 2008 order, the Court denied Soilworks’ summary judgment

motion with respect to Midwest’s claims for a declaratory judgment of

infringement. 

DATED this 5th day of September, 2008.

 

Case 2:06-cv-02141-DGC Document 98 Filed 09/05/08 Page 2 of 2