Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00821/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00821-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 320
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Libel, Assault, Slander

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TROY JACQUES,

Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:12-cv-000821-SAB

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND 

AND VACATING DATES

(ECF Nos. 92, 93)

On August 1, 2014, the parties notified the court that they were seeking amendment of 

the scheduling order issued November 8, 2013. On August 29, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to 

amend the complaint.

A telephonic hearing was held on August 29, 2014 to address the request to amend the 

scheduling order. Counsel Stephen Cornwell appeared for Plaintiff and counsel John-Paul 

Lapointe appeared for Defendant. During the hearing, Defendant indicated that they do not 

oppose the motion to amend the complaint.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. All dates established in the amended scheduling order issued November 8, 2013 

are VACATED;

2. Plaintiff’s motion to file an amended complaint is GRANTED;

Case 1:12-cv-00821-SAB Document 95 Filed 09/02/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. The hearing set for October 8, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. on the motion to amend the 

complaint is VACATED; 

4. Plaintiff shall file a fifth amended complaint on or before September 8, 2014; 

5. The Court shall address setting new deadlines once Defendant Early Warning 

Services has appeared in this action and a consent or decline form is filed; and

6. A scheduling conference is set for November 18, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. in 

Courtroom 9. The parties shall file a joint scheduling conference report one week 

prior to the scheduling conference in conformity with the requirements set forth in 

the Court’s order setting mandatory scheduling conference dated May 18, 2012

regarding dates only, unless the added party wishes to supplement any matter 

necessary for the Court’s consideration at the scheduling conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 2, 2014 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00821-SAB Document 95 Filed 09/02/14 Page 2 of 2