Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05883/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05883-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DB2/21662920.1 (CV 09-5883 SI) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

JOHN H. HEMANN, State Bar No. 165823 

STEPHANIE L. JOHNSON, State Bar No. 246073 

JASON B. ALLEN, State Bar No. 251759 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

E-mail: jhemann@morganlewis.com

stephanie.johnson@morganlewis.com

jason.allen@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

VINAYAK S. GOWRISH 

THOMAS E. STEVENS, State Bar No. 168362 

11th Floor, Federal Building 

450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Tel: 415.436.6559 

Fax: 415.436.7234 

E-mail: thomas.stevens@usdoj.gov

Attorney for Third Parties 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 

U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

VINAYAK S. GOWRISH, 

Defendant.

Case No. CV 09-5883 (SI) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE OF VINAYAK S. GOWRISH’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF 

DOCUMENTS BY THE FEDERAL 

BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND THE 

U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Date: May 7, 2010 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 10, 19th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Susan Illston 

Case 3:09-cv-05883-SI Document 28 Filed 04/12/10 Page 1 of 3
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DB2/21662920.1 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

 WHEREAS, on December 16, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) 

filed this action against Defendant Vinayak S. Gowrish (“Mr. Gowrish”); 

WHEREAS, on February 22, 2010, pursuant to the Touhy (United States ex rel. Touhy v. 

Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951); 28 C.F.R. § 16.21, et seq.) procedures, counsel for Mr. Gowrish sent 

a letter to Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas E. Stevens stating the intent to serve subpoenas for the 

production of documents on third parties the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and the U.S. 

Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California (“USAO”);

WHEREAS, on March 4, 2010, Mr. Gowrish served separate subpoenas for the 

production of documents on the FBI and the USAO; 

WHEREAS, on March 25, 2010, Mr. Stevens sent counsel for Mr. Gowrish a letter on 

behalf of the FBI and the USAO objecting to the two subpoenas and respectfully declining to 

produce any responsive documents; 

WHEREAS, on March 26, 2010, at the first Case Management Conference, counsel for 

Mr. Gowrish selected a hearing date of May 7, 2010, for Mr. Gowrish’s motion to compel 

production of documents by the FBI and USAO (“motion to compel”); 

WHEREAS, on March 26, 2010, at the first Case Management Conference, the Court 

advised that Mr. Gowrish’s motion to compel could be subject to a compressed briefing schedule 

pursuant to stipulation; 

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:09-cv-05883-SI Document 28 Filed 04/12/10 Page 2 of 3
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DB2/21662920.1 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

NOW THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, MR. GOWRISH, THE FBI, AND 

THE USAO HEREBY STIPULATE and AGREE and respectfully request that the Court modify 

the filing deadlines associated with Mr. Gowrish’s motion to compel as follows: 

Motion: April 9, 2010 

Opposition: April 20, 2010 

Reply: April 23, 2010 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 9, 2010 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

By /s/ John H. Hemann 

 JOHN H. HEMANN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

VINAYAK S. GOWRISH 

Dated: April 9, 2010 

By /s/ Thomas E. Stevens 

 THOMAS E. STEVENS 

Attorney for Third Parties 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 

U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________________, 2010 _______________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 3:09-cv-05883-SI Document 28 Filed 04/12/10 Page 3 of 3