Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00815/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00815-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOUANG SAECHO, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LANDRY’S INC, a Delaware corporation,

and McCORMICK & SCHMICK

RESTAURANT CORP., a Delaware

corporation,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-00815 WHA

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE

LIENHOLDER’S MOTION

The parties informed Judge Ryu that they have resolved their fee dispute and continued

their settlement conference accordingly. By NOON ON NOVEMBER 1, they shall please state

whether the motion to have the fees deposited into a trust should be denied as moot or if the

hearing on that motion should be continued.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2016. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-00815-WHA Document 160 Filed 10/31/16 Page 1 of 1