Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-00276/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-00276-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KELLY B. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

K. PHUI, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK (PC)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

(Doc. No. 87)

ORDER DISREGARDING AS MOOT 

PLAINTIFF’S DUPLICATIVE MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME

(Doc. No. 88)

JULY 22, 2024 DEADLINE

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Kelly B. Davis’ second Motion for Extension of Time

filed on June 20, 2024. (Doc. No. 87). On the same day, Plaintiff filed a second copy of the 

identical motion. (Doc. No. 88). Plaintiff seeks a further 30-day extension of time to file his

opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, which was filed on May 14, 2024. (Id.). 

Plaintiff asserts he needs additional time to file his opposition because Defendants’ motion is 

lengthy and contains several exhibits; further, Plaintiff’s counsel only recently received additional 

medical documents from CDCR, which counsel has not fully reviewed and must do so before filing 

an opposition. (Id. at 1-2). Plaintiff states that Defense counsel does not object to the extension. 

The Court may grant an extension of time “with or without motion or notice if the court 

Case 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK Document 89 Filed 06/21/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 

6(b)(1)(A). The Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff’s requested extension. Plaintiff must file 

his opposition to Defendants’ summary judgment motion no later than July 22, 2024.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s second motion for extension of time (Doc. No. 87) is GRANTED.

Defendant must file his opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment no 

later than July 22, 2024.

2. The Court will disregard as moot Plaintiff’s duplicative motion for extension of time 

(Doc. No. 88).

Dated: June 21, 2024 

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK Document 89 Filed 06/21/24 Page 2 of 2