Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06483/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06483-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO B. GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SMITH, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06483-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 7)

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

(Doc. 14)

Mario B. Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On March 10, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On March 30, 2006, the United States Postal Service

returned the Findings and Recommendations served on Plaintiff as

undeliverable. On April 14, 2006, the Court re-served Plaintiff

Case 1:04-cv-06483-OWW -SMS Document 15 Filed 10/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

with the Findings and Recommendations. On May 3, 2006 and July

19, 2006, respectively, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of

Time. On June 6, 2006 and August 17, 2006, respectively, the

Court granted Plaintiff an additional thirty (30) days within

which to respond. On September 14, 2006, Plaintiff filed a

Motion to Dismiss, without prejudice. To date, Plaintiff has not

filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed March 10, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety; and,

3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss, filed September 14,

2006, is DENIED as MOOT.

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter Judgment in

accordance with this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 25, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06483-OWW -SMS Document 15 Filed 10/27/06 Page 2 of 2