Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04842/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04842-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS SHINBORI,

Plaintiff,

v.

STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-04842-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings February 10, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions August 18, 2016

Fact discovery cut-off September 23, 2016

Expert disclosures October 21, 2016

Expert rebuttal November 11, 2016

Expert discovery cut-off December 9, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due January 10, 2017

Pretrial conference January 20, 2017 at 

2:00 p.m.

Trial February 13, 2017 at 

8:30 a.m.

Case 3:15-cv-04842-JST Document 27 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Estimate of trial length (in days) Six

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2016

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-04842-JST Document 27 Filed 01/27/16 Page 2 of 2