Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00672/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00672-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1365 Environmental Matters

---

1

STIPULATION AND THIRD JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE: CLOSE OF NON-EXPERT & EXPERT 

DISCOVERY AND ORDER

GUALCO LAW

400 Capitol Mall

Eleventh Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LORI J. GUALCO (Bar No. 95232)

GUALCO LAW

400 Capitol Mall, Eleventh Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Tel: (916) 930-0700

Fax: (916) 930-0705

Email: ljgualco@gualcolaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff 

MISSION LINEN SUPPLY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

MISSION LINEN SUPPLY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF VISALIA,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00672-AWI-EPG

STIPULATION AND THIRD JOINT 

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

REGARDING CLOSE OF NONEXPERT DISCOVERY AND EXPERT 

DISCOVERY AND ORDER

Date Complaint Filed: May 1, 2015

Trial Date: December 13, 2016

Plaintiff Mission Linen Supply (“Plaintiff Mission”), by and through its attorney of 

record, Gualco Law and Lori J. Gualco, and Defendant City of Visalia (“Defendant City”), by 

and through its attorneys of record, Herr, Pedersen & Berglund LLP and Leonard C. Herr, 

having met and conferred on the issue of moving the following discovery dates listed in numbers 

1 through 4 below, hereby stipulate and agree that good cause exists for a third extension of

discovery dates in this case. The stipulation and request for order granting a first extension of 

discovery dates was submitted on February 5, 2016 and an order was signed and filed on 

February 8, 2016. The stipulation and request for order granting a second extension of discovery 

dates was submitted on April 7, 2016 and an order was signed on April 12, 2016 and filed on 

April 13, 2016. Defendant City’s FRCP Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses were coordinated for a joint 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 1:15-cv-00672-AWI-EPG Document 25 Filed 05/12/16 Page 1 of 4
2

STIPULATION AND THIRD JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE: CLOSE OF NON-EXPERT & EXPERT 

DISCOVERY AND ORDER

GUALCO LAW

400 Capitol Mall

Eleventh Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

deposition with the parties in the case entitled Coppola v. Paragon Cleaners, Inc., et al., Case 

No.1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM.

Due to discovery being coordinated in this case and with the Coppola v. Paragon 

Cleaners, Inc., et al. case for the depositions of Defendant City’s Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses, and 

those depositions being conducted the last week of April 2016, the parties have experienced a 

delay in the scheduling of several additional specified Defendant City depositions to be taken in 

this case and jointly in the Coppola v. Paragon Cleaners, Inc., et al. case.

The Plaintiff Mission and Defendant City agree that the extended discovery dates shall 

be as follows: 

1. Date of Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff extended from May 15, 2016 to June 15, 

2016 for the depositions of the following witnesses to be conducted: Defendant

City of Visalia employees Jim Ross, Mike Olmos and Richard Paradez, and Brian

Vanciel, a former employee of the City of Visalia, to be conducted jointly with 

the taking of these depositions in the Coppola v. Paragon Cleaners, Inc. et al. 

case;

2. Date of Initial Expert Disclosure extended from July 6, 2016 to July 27, 2016;

3. Date of Rebuttal Expert Disclosure extended from August 16, 2016 to August 30, 

2016; and

4. Date of Expert Discovery Cutoff extended from August 29, 2016 to September 

12, 2016.

Plaintiff Mission and Defendant City jointly move for an order regarding the above dates.

Dated: May 11, 2016 GUALCO LAW

Case 1:15-cv-00672-AWI-EPG Document 25 Filed 05/12/16 Page 2 of 4
3

STIPULATION AND THIRD JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE: CLOSE OF NON-EXPERT & EXPERT 

DISCOVERY AND ORDER

GUALCO LAW

400 Capitol Mall

Eleventh Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

By: /s/ Lori J. Gualco 

 LORI J. GUALCO 

 Attorney for Plaintiff MISSION LINEN 

 SUPPLY

Dated: May 11, 2016 HERR PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP 

By: /s/ Leonard C. Herr, as authorized on 5-11-16 

Leonard C. Herr

Ron Statler

Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF VISALIA

Case 1:15-cv-00672-AWI-EPG Document 25 Filed 05/12/16 Page 3 of 4
4

STIPULATION AND THIRD JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE: CLOSE OF NON-EXPERT & EXPERT 

DISCOVERY AND ORDER

GUALCO LAW

400 Capitol Mall

Eleventh Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Based on the above Joint Stipulation of Plaintiff Mission Linen Supply and Defendant 

City of Visalia, the extended dates for discovery are as follows:

1. Date of Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff extended from May 15, 2016 to June 15, 

2016 for the depositions of the following witnesses to be conducted: Defendant 

City of Visalia employees Jim Ross, Mike Olmos and Richard Paradez, and Brian

Vanciel, a former employee of the City of Visalia, to be conducted jointly with 

the taking of these depositions in the Coppola v. Paragon Cleaners, Inc. et al.

case;

2. Date of Initial Expert Disclosure extended from July 6, 2016 to July 27, 2016;

3. Date of Rebuttal Expert Disclosure extended from August 16, 2016 to August 30, 

2016; and

4. Date of Expert Discovery Cutoff extended from August 29, 2016 to September 

12, 2016.

All other dates set forth in the scheduling order (ECF No. 11) remain unchanged, 

including the deadline for the filing of dispositive motions, the pretrial conference date, and trial

date. The Court notes that this stipulation constitutes the fourth stipulation to amend the 

scheduling order that the parties have filed. The parties are thus advised that further requests to 

modify the scheduling order will be viewed with disfavor.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00672-AWI-EPG Document 25 Filed 05/12/16 Page 4 of 4