Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01026/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01026-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FEBRUARY 28, 2007 ORDER—No.

C-04-01026 RMW

MAG

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 3/22/07

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ROBERT SCHMIDT and THOMAS WALSH,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LEVI STRAUSS & CO., LAURA LIANG, et

al.,

Defendants.

No. C-04-01026 RMW

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS'

OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S FEBRUARY 28, 2007 ORDER

[Re Docket No. 138]

On March 13, 2007, plaintiffs filed an objection to the February 28, 2007 order of the

magistrate judge assigned to this case denying plaintiffs' motion to compel. Plaintiffs' objection

stated simply "Plaintiffs object to the Order issued on February 28, 2007 . . . denying plaintiffs'

motion to compel production of documents as against third party Steven Todrys and Simpson

Thatcher Bartlett. . . . Plaintiffs bring this motion pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(A). Plaintiffs request the opportunity to more fully brief this issue consistent with the

court's schedule." No further argument was submitted.

Case 5:04-cv-01026-RMW Document 139 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FEBRUARY 28, 2007 ORDER—No.

C-04-01026 RMW

MAG 2

Plaintiffs' objection is defective as the court cannot determine from plaintiffs' submission on

what grounds they object to the magistrate judge's ruling. The court declines to permit the plaintiffs

"to more fully brief this issue" (whatever that issue may be) and overrules their objection.

DATED: 3/21/07

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:04-cv-01026-RMW Document 139 Filed 03/22/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FEBRUARY 28, 2007 ORDER—No.

C-04-01026 RMW

MAG 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

Joseph Heathcliff Ainley JAinley@popelka.com, gsimmons@popelka.com

Franklin Edward Bondonno fbondonno@popelka.com, dlee@popelka.com

Philip Edward Kay phil@nosexualharassment.com

Counsel for Defendants:

Rebecca Justice Lazarus rjustice@gibsondunn.com, rmcbain@gibsondunn.com

Jeffrey A. Leon jleon@leonandleon.com, leonandleon@leonandleon.com

Jeffry W. Lochner jlochner@popelka.com, kanderson@popelka.com

Sheila Marie Pierce sheila.pierce@bingham.com 

Gabriel Neil Rubin grubin@stblaw.com, jlaw@stblaw.com, hlelaind@stblaw.com

Erin E. Schneider eschneider@gibsondunn.com 

Austin Van Schwing aschwing@gibsondunn.com 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 3/22/07 /s/ MAG

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:04-cv-01026-RMW Document 139 Filed 03/22/07 Page 3 of 3