Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01524/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01524-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 It is unclear how the due date for the reply brief was “mis-calendared” given that it was

expressly set by prior court order and did not need to be calculated with reference to a hearing date.

1

*E-FILED 4/26/07*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SYNAPSIS, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

 v.

EVERGREEN DATA SYSTEMS, INC. et al,

Defendants. /

NO. C 05-1524 JF (RS)

ORDER RE MOTION TO

COMPEL

Before the Court is plaintiff's motion to compel, presently set for hearing on May 2, 2007. 

The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument, pursuant to Local Rule 7-

1 (b). The motion to compel is denied. In its late-filed reply brief,1

 plaintiff asserts that the only

issues remaining in dispute between the parties are: (1) whether defendant must produce

“[e]lectronic versions of the Quantum and Goldmine databases, and, (2) setting a firm date for

production of all additional materials that defendant has agreed to produce. As to the first issue,

which was not squarely presented in the moving papers, plaintiff has failed to show a basis to require

production of electronic versions of the databases, when doing so would include the production of

data outside the scope of plaintiff’s document requests. As to the second issue, 

Case 5:05-cv-01524-JF Document 254 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

defendant is expected to produce all remaining materials with reasonable diligence and speed,

particularly to the extent that the ordinary time provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may

have already expired. On this record, however, the Court declines to set a further specific deadline. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2007 

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01524-JF Document 254 Filed 04/26/07 Page 2 of 2