Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04093/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04093-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2 SUE ELLEN WOOLDRIDGE

Assistant Attorney General

U.S. Department ofJustice

Environment & Natural Resources Div.

TODD W. GLEASON

U.S. Dep't of Justice

Env. & Natural Resources Div.

Env. Defense Section

6 P.O. Box 23986

Washington D.C. 20026-3986

Telephone: (202) 305-0739

Fax: (202) 353-7763

3

4

5

7

8

9

Email: todd.gleason~usdoi.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

10

11

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13 SAN FRACISCO DIVISION

14

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ) 20 AGENCY, et aL. )

)

)

)

PHYSICIANS COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBLE

MEDICINE, et aL. 15

16

17

Plaintiffs,

18 -vs19

21

22 Defendants.

23

24

Case No. C-05-04093 CRB

JOINT STIPULATION

SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND

(PROPOSED) ORDER

25

26

WHEREAS, this Court has granted/endorsed two prior motions/stipulations for extensions of

defendants' answering time (Docs. 18,37).

27

28

STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE; C-05-04093 CRB

Case 3:05-cv-04093-CRB Document 49 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, on February 13, 2006, defendants fied an Answer (Doc. 21-1) to plaintiffs'

complaint.

WHEREAS, on April 4, 2006, plaintiffs filed a "Motion for Leave to File Amended

Complaint" (Docs. 33-35).

WHEREAS, the Court granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend on April 27, 2006 (Doc.

39), and ordered the defendants to respond to the amended complaint within 30 days of service

thereof.

WHEREAS, on or about Apri128, 2006, plaintiffs fied their First Amended Complaint (Doc.

40).

WHEREAS, on May~2006, defendants filed their First Amended Answer (Doc.'C.

WHEREAS, in the interests of judicial economy, the parties believe that all procedural,

jurisdictional, and legal issues can be resolved in one round of briefing.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6 and Judge Charles Breyer's Standing Orders, the above-captioned

PARTIES THEREFORE AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiffs wil fie a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure ("FRCP") by May 31, 2006.

2. Defendants wil fie a Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summar Judgment and

Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by July 12,2006.

3. Plaintiffs wil fie a Reply in Support of their Motion for Summar Judgment and a

Response to Defendants' Cross-Motion by August 2,2006.

4. Defendants wil file a Reply in Support of their Cross-Motion by August 23,2006.

5. A hearing on all motions and cross-motions wil be held on September 8,2006, or as

soon thereafter as counsel may be heard.

STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE; C-05-04093 CRB - 2-

Case 3:05-cv-04093-CRB Document 49 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 3
1 DA TE: Ma~-i 2006

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

Date:

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SUE ELLEN WOOLDRIDGE

Assistant Attorney General

Environmen rl Natural Resources Division

ANIEL KINBURN pro hac vice

CLAIRE LOUISE GREGORY, pro hac vice

Physicians' Committee for Responsible Medicine

5100-Wisconsin Ave., N.W.

Washington D.C. 20016

Telephone: (202) 686-2210

BRUCE A. WAGMAN (CSB # 159987)

ADRIENNE S. LEIGHT (CSB # 226854)

Morgenstein & Jubelirer LLP

One Market St., Spear Street Tower, 32nd Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 901-8700

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

~ 2006

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer

United States Distrct Judge

Northern District of California

STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE; C-05-04093 CRB - 3 -

May 24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-04093-CRB Document 49 Filed 05/24/06 Page 3 of 3