Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01756/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01756-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS G. SANCHEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

S. FRAUENHEIM,

Respondent.

No. 1:15-cv-01756-DAD-SKO (HC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

PETITION WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

(Doc. No. 7)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for 

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court referred the matter to the 

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 304.

On December 30, 2015, the assigned magistrate judge filed findings and recommendation 

recommending that the petition be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for habeas 

relief with leave to amend granted. (Doc. No. 7.) Specifically, the assigned magistrate judge 

recommended that petitioner be given an opportunity to amend in order to reorganize his petition 

and to present more specific and detailed claims and supporting allegations. (Doc. No. 7, at 2–3.) 

The findings and recommendations provided that any objections thereto could be served within 

thirty days. Petitioner filed no objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), having carefully reviewed 

the entire file de novo, the court finds that the findings and recommendations are supported by the 

Case 1:15-cv-01756-DAD-SKO Document 8 Filed 03/08/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

record and proper analysis. 

For the reasons set forth above:

1.) The findings and recommendation (Doc. No. 7), filed December 30, 2015, is 

ADOPTED in full.

2.) Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, petitioner may file an 

amended petition in which he reorganizes his claims, expresses his claims briefly but 

clearly, and provides sufficient factual and legal support to enable the court and the 

respondent to understand the nature of each claim as directed by the assigned magistrate 

judge.

3.) Petitioner is advised that an amended petition supersedes his original petition and 

must be “complete in itself without reference to the prior or superseded pleading.” L.R.

15-220.

4) The clerk of the court is directed to serve petitioner with this order and a new form of 

petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

5.) Petitioner is forewarned that if he fails to file an amended petition within thirty (30) 

days of service of this order, this habeas action may be dismissed, without prejudice, for 

failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 7, 2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01756-DAD-SKO Document 8 Filed 03/08/16 Page 2 of 2