Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06580/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06580-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MORRIS LEE MESTER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DR. M. KIM, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06580-LJO-SMS PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 97)

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Doc. 92 & 95)

Plaintiff Morris Lee Mester (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights

action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 5, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. To date,

neither plaintiff nor defendants have filed any objection to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:04-cv-06580-LJO -SMS Document 113 Filed 03/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of

this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the

record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 5, 2007,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief,

filed December 7, 2006, and December 22, 2006, are DENIED, with

prejudice, on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction in this

action to issue the order sought.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06580-LJO -SMS Document 113 Filed 03/20/07 Page 2 of 2