Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01507/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01507-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DETERMINING DAMAGES THROUGH TRIAL 

CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

David Eiseman (Cal. Bar No. 114758) 

davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com

Albert P. Bedecarre (Cal. Bar No. 148178) 

albedecarre@quinnemanuel.com

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SILICONIX INCORPORATED 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Brent Caslin (Cal. Bar No. 198682) 

bcaslin@kirkland.com

Nick Saros (Cal. Bar No. 209922) 

nsaros@kirkland.com

Chris Almand (Cal. Bar No. 222755 ) 

calmand@kirkland.com

777 South Figueroa Street, Floor 37 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (213) 680-8400 

Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

William A. Streff, Jr. (Ill. Bar No. 2753979) 

wstreff@kirkland.com

Paul R. Steadman (pro hac vice) 

psteadman@kirkland.com

Tomoko Itoga (Cal. Bar No. 207097) 

titoga@kirkland.com

200 East Randolph Drive 

Chicago, Illinois 60601-6636 

Telephone: (312) 861-2000 

Facsimile: (312) 861-2200 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

DENSO CORPORATION and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SILICONIX INCORPORATED, a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DENSO CORPORATION, a Japanese 

corporation, and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC., a 

Michigan corporation, 

 Defendants. 

_______________________________________

AND CONSOLIDATED ACTION 

NOS. C 04-00344 WHA and C 05-03617 WHA.

CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DETERMINING DAMAGES THROUGH 

TRIAL

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 125 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 1 of 6
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 128 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DETERMINING DAMAGES THROUGH TRIAL

-2- CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, DENSO CORPORATION (“DENSO”) and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC. 

(“TD SCAN”) assert they are not liable for patent infringement, that the patent at issue in this case is 

invalid, and all other arguments, claims, and defenses described in their pleadings and other papers 

in this case remain in force except as expressly set forth herein; 

WHEREAS, Siliconix incorporated (“Siliconix”) asserts DENSO and TD SCAN are liable 

for patent infringement, that the patent at issue in this case is valid, and all other arguments, claims, 

and defenses described in its pleadings and other papers in this case remain in force except as 

expressly set forth herein; 

WHEREAS, because there is not much dispute over the issue of potential damages in this 

case, Siliconix, TD SCAN, and DENSO have discussed the possibility of stipulating to past damages 

figures for the purpose of saving the parties and the Court time and money litigating the proper 

amount of damages that might be awarded to Siliconix for the time period up through the date of 

trial; 

WHEREAS, Siliconix, DENSO, and TD SCAN have agreed to stipulate to the amount of 

potential damages in this case for the period of time up to and including November 2006 (the 

anticipated month of the trial of this case); 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between 

Siliconix, on the one hand, and DENSO and TD SCAN, on the other hand, through their respective 

counsel of record, as follows: 

1. If liability is found for one or more of the accused MOSFETs listed below, past 

damages for such liability (until November 30, 2006) shall be, for each MOSFET, as follows: 

• If liability is found for the 2SK3271 MOSFET: $120.70 payable to Siliconix by 

DENSO. 

• If liability is found for the 335 MOSFET: $97.00 payable to Siliconix by TD SCAN. 

• If liability is found for the 1873 MOSFET: $248.86 payable to Siliconix by TD 

SCAN. 

• If liability is found for the 231 MOSFET: $38.55 payable to Siliconix by TD SCAN. 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 125 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 2 of 6
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 128 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DETERMINING DAMAGES THROUGH TRIAL

-3- CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

2. Neither DENSO nor TD SCAN shall be required to pay any money to Siliconix under 

this agreement, unless DENSO or TD SCAN are found liable for patent infringement and fail to 

prove a counterclaim or defense. 

3. This Stipulation shall have no effect on any parties’ claims for, calculations of, or 

defenses to damages claimed by Siliconix for any period of time after November 30, 2006. This 

Stipulation shall also have absolutely no effect on any parties’ arguments for or against the propriety 

of an injunction as a remedy in this case. 

4. This Stipulation shall not be shown to, or its existence revealed to, the jury. 

5. This Stipulation may not be used by any party for any other purpose whatsoever, 

except to establish the total amount of damages payable in this case in the event liability is 

established for one or more of the accused MOSFETs identified in this Stipulation. 

6. In the unlikely event trial of this matter is rescheduled, the parties shall in good faith 

re-negotiate the past damages figures in this Stipulation using the same methodology employed to 

calculate the past figures listed herein for the purpose of causing this Stipulation to cover all time 

periods up to and including the month of the actual trial date. 

Dated: July 14, 2006 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

By: /s/ Chris Almand 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

DENSO CORPORATION and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC.

Dated: July 14, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

By: /s/ Albert P. Bedecarré 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-defendant 

SILICONIX INCORPORATED 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 125 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 3 of 6
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 128 Filed 07/17/06 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DETERMINING DAMAGES THROUGH TRIAL

-4- CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 

The Honorable William H. Alsup 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 125 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 4 of 6

July 17, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 128 Filed 07/17/06 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DETERMINING DAMAGES THROUGH TRIAL

-5- CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 

and not a party to the within action. My business address is Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 777 South 

Figueroa Street, Suite 3400, Los Angeles, California 90017. 

On July 14, 2006, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DETERMINING DAMAGES THROUGH TRIAL on the interested 

parties in this action by placing true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as set 

forth on the attached service list: 

[Electronic Mail] By sending the document(s) listed above via e-mail as an 

attachment in 'pdf' format to the person(s) at the e-mail address(es) set forth below. 

Chris Scott Graham, Esq. 

chris.scott.graham@dechert.com Justin F. Boyce, Esq. 

justin.boyce@dechert.com

Dechert, LLP 

1117 California Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: 650-813-4800 

Fax: 650-813-4848 

Attorneys for Advanced Analogic 

Technologies 

Peter Chen, Esq. 

pchen@mwe.com

Bijal V. Vakil, Esq. 

bvakil@mwe.com

McDermott Will & Emery 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: 650-813-5088 

Fax: 650-813-5100 

Attorneys for Panasonic Corporation of 

North America 

David Eiseman, Esq. 

davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com 

Albert P. Bedecarré, Esq. 

albedecarre@quinnemanuel.com

Diane M. Doolittle, Esq. 

dianedoolittle@quinnemanuel.com

Aaron N. Monick, Esq. 

aaronmonick@quinnemanuel.com

Carl G. Anderson, Esq. 

carlanderson@quinnemanuel.com

Emily C. O'Brien, Esq. 

emilyobrien@quinnemanuel.com

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver 

 & Hedges, LLP 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415-875-6600 

Fax: 415-875-6700 

Attorneys for Siliconix, Inc. 

[Federal] I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 125 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 5 of 6
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 128 Filed 07/17/06 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DETERMINING DAMAGES THROUGH TRIAL

-6- CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

court at whose direction the service was made. 

Executed July 14, 2006, at Los Angeles, California. 

/s/ Mario Aguillon 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 125 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 6 of 6
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 128 Filed 07/17/06 Page 6 of 6