Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01051/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01051-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Though some of the plaintiffs have made global settlement demands, given the outstanding 

motions for summary judgment, defendants are not prepared to discuss settlement. (Doc. 127 at 2) 

Thus, counsel stipulate that the settlement conference, currently set on January 15, 2016, should be 

moved to February. Id. Thus, good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:

1. The settlement conference is continued to February 23, 20161at 9:30 a.m.;

2. Counsel SHALL comply with the requirements of the scheduling order related to the 

settlement conference (Doc. 85 at 7-8) including the exchange of meaning settlement offers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

1 The Court is concerned that the motions for summary judgment may not yet be decided by February 23, 2016 or may not 

be decided sufficiently in advance of that date to allow the exchange of meaningful settlement offers. In the event the 

Court’s concerns prove true, counsel SHALL seek a further continuance of the settlement conference.

TARA GARLICK, et al.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-01051 LJO JLT

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

(Doc. 127)

Case 1:13-cv-01051-LJO-JLT Document 128 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 1