Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-02437/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-02437-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

File No. 11005-002 

STEVEN E. MOYER, ESQ. (SBN 047326) 

PATRICK A. FRAIOLI, ESQ. (SBN 191824) 

JESSICA BARFIELD-McCARREN (SBN 212217) 

Rein Evans & Sestanovich LLP 

1925 Century Park East, 16th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90067 OK/HAV 

Tel: (310) 551-3100 

Fax: (310) 551-0238 

MICHAEL R. MITCHELL, ESQ. (SBN 048348) 

20300 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 317 

Woodland Hills, California 91364 

Tel: (818) 887-7100 

Fax: (818) 887-0010 

DIANA MARAGOS, ESQ. (SBN 107111) 

P.O. Box 247 

Galt, CA 95632 

Tel: (209) 744-8273 

Fax: (209) 744-8275 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRL, a California 

partnership, et al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KRL, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

RUSSELL MOORE et al. 

 Defendants 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CIV. S-99-2437 DFL DAD 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING 

ORDER 

Honorable David F. Levi, Judge 

U.S. District Court 

501 “I” Street 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

WHEREAS, by the Court’s orders of July 14, 2005, and August 16, 2005, the following 

dates are currently scheduled in the above-captioned matter: the hearing on Defendants’ pending 

Motions for Summary Judgment is set for September 14, 2005; the Pre-Trial Conference is set for 

November 4, 2005; and the Trial is set for February 6, 2005. 

Case 2:99-cv-02437-JAM-DAD Document 446 Filed 08/29/05 Page 1 of 4
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties agree that a continuance of the September 14, 2005, hearing date for 

the Motions for Summary Judgment is necessary in order to allow sufficient time for briefing; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that a continuance of the November 4, 2005 Pre-Trial 

Conference date is appropriate in order to allow sufficient time between the hearing on the 

dispositive motions and the preparation of the pre-trial conference statements; 

WHEREAS, the parties understand that if the Pre-Trial Conference date is to be continued, 

the Court requires that the Trial date must be continued by at least the same amount of time; and 

WHEREAS, the Courtroom Deputy has informed the parties that the first available date for 

trial that meets the above criteria is February 27, 2006; 

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties as 

follows: 

1. Defendants’ pending Motions for Summary Judgment shall be set for hearing on 

September 28, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. All filing deadlines calculated by reference to the hearing date 

shall be calculated based on this date. 

2. The Pre-Trial Conference shall be set for November 18, 2005, at 2:00 p.m. All filing 

deadlines calculated by reference to the Pre-Trial Conference date shall be calculated based on this 

date. 

3. The Trial shall be set for February 27, 2006, at 8:30 a.m. 

4. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall file this stipulation with the Court electronically, in 

accordance with local rules. The signatories below will transmit facsimile or e-mail copies of their 

handwritten signatures to Plaintiffs’ counsel. Plaintiffs’ counsel will indicate the agreement and 

signatures of all counsel on the document filed with the Court according to local rules regarding 

electronic filing of signatures. 

Dated: August 23, 2005 REIN EVANS & SESTANOVICH LLP 

By: /s/ Steven E. Moyer 

Steven E. Moyer, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRL, Roland Womack, 

Nadine Womack, Larry Womack, Luke Womack, 

and Renee Womack 

Case 2:99-cv-02437-JAM-DAD Document 446 Filed 08/29/05 Page 2 of 4
3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: August 23, 2005 

By: /s/Michael R. Mitchell (as authorized on 8/23/05)

Michael R. Mitchell, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRL, Roland Womack, 

Nadine Womack, Larry Womack, Luke Womack, 

and Renee Womack 

Dated: August 23, 2005 

By: /s/ Diana Maragos (as authorized on 8/23/05) 

Diana Maragos, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRL, Roland Womack, 

Nadine Womack, Larry Womack, Luke Womack, 

and Renee Womack 

Dated: August 23, 2005 JOHNSON SCHACHTER & COLLINS 

By: /s/ Robert H. Johnson (as authorized on 8/23/05)

Robert H. Johnson, Esq. 

Attorneys for Defendants Todd D. Riebe and Ron 

Hall 

Dated: August 23, 2005 SCOTT, NICHOLS & MATTEUCCI 

By: /s/ William S. Scott (as authorized on 8/23/05) 

William S. Scott, Esq. 

Attorneys for Defendant David J. Irey 

Case 2:99-cv-02437-JAM-DAD Document 446 Filed 08/29/05 Page 3 of 4
4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: August 23, 2005 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA 

By: /s/ Stephen C. Pass (as authorized on 8/23/05) 

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General 

Darryl L. Doke, Supervising Deputy General 

Stephen C. Pass, Deputy Attorney General 

Attorneys for Defendant Russell Moore 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 26, 2005 

______________________________ 

DAVID F. LEVI 

United States District Judge

Case 2:99-cv-02437-JAM-DAD Document 446 Filed 08/29/05 Page 4 of 4