Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01988/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01988-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUN’S MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME – CASE NO. 06-01988 (CRB) [JCS]

DM_US\8413908.v1

HOWREY LLP

Henry C. Bunsow (State Bar No. 60707)

Benjamin K. Riley (State Bar No. 112007)

HOWREY LLP

525 Market Street, Suite 3600

San Francisco, CA 94105-2708

Telephone: (415) 848-4900

Facsimile: (415) 848-4999

Thomas M. Dunham (pro hac vice)

Nelson M. Kee (pro hac vice)

HOWREY LLP

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: (202) 783-0800

Facsimile: (202) 383-6610

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

AZUL SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,

vs.

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant and Counter-Claimant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 06-01988 (CRB) [JCS]

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUN’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE OPPOSITION TO AZUL’S MOTION 

TO REMOVE CONFIDENTIAL 

DESIGNATION FROM SUN’S SECTION 

2019 STATEMENT (Local Rule 6-3)

Date: December 15, 2006

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Place: Courtroom A, 15th Floor

Judge: The Honorable Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:06-cv-01988-CRB Document 51 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUN’S MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME – CASE NO. 06-01988 (CRB) [JCS]

DM_US\8413908.v1

HOWREY LLP

Having considered the motion filed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. (“Sun”), pursuant to Local Rule 

6-3, to extend time to file opposition to Azul Systems, Inc.’s (“Azul”) Motion to Remove Confidential 

Designation from Sun’s Section 2019 Statement (the “Motion”), and good cause appearing therefor:

The Court hereby GRANTS the Motion. Sun shall have until and including Friday, December 

1, 2006, to file its opposition brief, and Azul shall have until and including Friday, December 8, 2006,

to file its reply brief. The hearing date shall remain as previously set for December 15, 2006, at 9:30

a.m.

Dated: 

The Honorable Joseph C. Spero

United States Magistrate Judge

November 22, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:06-cv-01988-CRB Document 51 Filed 11/22/06 Page 2 of 2