Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01747/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01747-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

Case No.16-cv-01747 NC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS HIX,

Plaintiff,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-01747 NC 

ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW 

CAUSE WHY HE DID NOT 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 31

In this unlawful foreclosure case, Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and U.S. 

Bank, N.A. have filed a motion to dismiss Hix’s amended complaint. Dkt. No. 27. Hix’s 

response to the motion to dismiss was due by July 15, 2016. Id. Hix has not filed a 

response to the motion.

Defendants ask the Court to deem Hix’s failure to respond to be non-opposition to 

their motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 31. Hix is ordered to show good cause why he failed to 

file a response to the motion to dismiss by July 15. If he does not, his failure to respond 

will be considered non-opposition to the motion to dismiss and his complaint will be 

dismissed. He must respond to this order by July 22, 2016, in a brief not to exceed 5 

pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 20, 2016 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:16-cv-01747-NC Document 32 Filed 07/20/16 Page 1 of 1