Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00824/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00824-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 490
Nature of Suit: Cable/ Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COMCAST OF CALIFORNIA I, INC.,

COMCAST OF CALIFORNIA/

MASSACHUSETTS/MICHIGAN/UTAH,

INC.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

THE CITY OF WALNUT CREEK,

CALIFORNIA, A MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA

Defendant. /

No. C 05-00824 WHA

ORDER REGARDING

SCHEDULING

In the above-named action, defendants moved for summary judgment and summary

adjudication. In response, plaintiffs moved for cross-motion for summary judgment. The civil

local rules have been modified and there is no longer a provision for cross-motions. Therefore,

the Court sets forth the following schedule:

• On July 14, 2005, the Court will hear both defendant’s motion for summary

judgment and summary adjudication, and plaintiffs’ motion for summary

judgment.

• Defendant shall file a reply to plaintiffs’ opposition to defendant’s motion for

summary judgment/opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment by

June 30, 2005. Defendant is to submit one set of briefs as its reply/opposition.

Case 3:05-cv-00824-WHA Document 61 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

• Plaintiffs shall file a reply to defendant’s opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for

summary judgment by July 5, 2005.

The Court understands that Comcast’s formal proposal for franchise renewal was due to

the City of Walnut Creek on May 20, 2005. Parties are to submit statements to the Court by 

5 P.M. on June 30, 2005, explaining the status of the proposal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2005 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-00824-WHA Document 61 Filed 06/24/05 Page 2 of 2