Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-02261/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-02261-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Plaintiff subsequently filed another in forma pauperis application, which will be

denied as moot. (Doc. 20.)

JDDL-K

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Leonard O’Dell, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Detention Officer Abbott, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-2261-PHX-RCB (MHB)

ORDER

Plaintiff Leonard O’Dell, who is confined in the Fourth Avenue Jail, filed a pro se

civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because Plaintiff had not paid the

$350.00 civil action filing fee or filed a proper Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis,

the Court denied Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with leave to either

pay the filing fee or file a properly completed in forma pauperis application. (Doc. 6.)

Plaintiff then filed a motion to defer or waive filing fees and an incomplete in forma pauperis

application, which were both denied. (Doc. 5, 8, 13.) Plaintiff has since filed a properlycompleted Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, which will be granted.1

 (Doc. 17.)

He has also filed two additional motions to waive fees, which will be denied. (Doc. 19, 23.)

Most recently, Plaintiff has filed a motion asking the Court to proceed with this case. (Doc.

27.) That motion will be granted to the extent set forth herein. 

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 1 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that after a party has

once amended a pleading, he may thereafter only amend the pleading with the opposing

party’s written consent or leave of court. Further, Local Rule 15.1 requires the party to

submit a copy of the proposed amended pleading with the motion seeking leave to amend.

LRCiv. 15.1. Plaintiff did not file a motion for leave to file the second of his amended

complaints. (Doc. 14.) 

JDDL-K - 2 -

After filing his Complaint on this District’s approved form, Plaintiff filed two

amended complaints on state court forms. (Doc. 9, 14.) The Court will strike both amended

complaints because Plaintiff failed to use this District’s approved form for filing a complaint

by a prisoner.2

 (Doc. 8, 14.) The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s original Complaint for failure

to state a claim with leave to amend.

I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

The Court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The statutory

fee will be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time

the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a

separate Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees

according to the statutory formula. 

II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against

a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised

claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may

be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). 

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not

demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendantCase 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 2 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 3 -

unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).

“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory

statements, do not suffice.” Id.

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content

that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the

misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for

relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial

experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual

allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there

are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951.

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts

must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th

Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards

than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89,

94 (2007) (per curiam)).

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts,

a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the

action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court

should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would

undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225,

231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was

required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint

for failure to state a claim, but because the Complaint may possibly be saved by amendment,

the Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend.

III. Complaint

Plaintiff alleges five counts for retaliation, denial of constitutionally adequate medical

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 3 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

 See http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/012012/m5045615.pdf

(last visited February 6, 2012). 

4

 On January 12, 2011, Plaintiff was sentenced to 3.5 years in prison for aggravated

assault. See http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/012011/m4555472.pdf

(last visited February 6, 2012). In the three pending cases, Plaintiff is charged with

promotion of prison contraband, aggravated assault, and destruction or injury to jail property.

See http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/caseInfo.asp?case

Number=CR2011-007699;http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourt

Cases/caseInfo.asp ?caseNumber=CR2011-101449;

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/caseInfo.asp?case

Number=CR2011-146392; http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourt

Cases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR2010-048132 (last visited February 6, 2012).

JDDL-K - 4 -

care, unconstitutional disciplinary proceedings, denial of access to the courts, and excessive

force and search and seizure. Plaintiff sues the following current or former employees of the

Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO): Detention Officers Abbott, Delatore, Kanar,

Papp, Richardson, Baker, Dunn, Looring, McCuller; and Sergeants Rose, Curtis, and Hayes.

Plaintiff seeks injunctive and compensatory relief. 

Background

Plaintiff is charged in three criminal cases in Maricopa County Superior Court, case#

CR2011-146392, CR2011-101449, and CR2011-007699.3

 The charges in all of these cases

appear to stem from incidents while Plaintiff was incarcerated in jail or prison in connection

with an earlier case, CR2010-048132.4

IV. Failure to Comply with LR Civ. 3.4(a) 

Local Rule 3.4(a) provides in relevant part that a complaint filed by an incarcerated

person “shall be signed and legibly written” or typed. Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to comply

with this requirement. The Complaint is hand-written and is only partially legible. Plaintiff

also failed to comply with the Instructions for completing the court-approved form

complaint. The Instructions specifically state that:

Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4 provides that complaints by

incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form

must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in

to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely

in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 4 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 5 -

pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized

paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and

number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked

to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing

of your action. You do not need to cite law. 

(Instructions at ¶ 1) (underlining added). The Instructions further provide that: 

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege

the violation of only one civil right per count. 2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue

involved in your claim. You may check only one box per count. If you

check the box marked “Other,” you must identify the specific issue involved.

3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated,

you must state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state

what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than

one defendant, you must identify which defendant did what act. You also

should state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred, if possible.

4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of

your rights.

(Instructions, part C) (underlining added). 

While Plaintiff used the court-approved form Complaint, he did not comply with the

Instructions for completing the court-approved form. Plaintiff fails to adequately and clearly

allege facts in support of each claim. For example, Plaintiff lists a series of dates when his

rights were allegedly violated without alleging specifically what happened on a particular

day, including who violated his rights and how, and where. Plaintiff’s allegations are

frequently rambling and difficult to follow. In addition, Plaintiff asserts multiple violations

in some counts, rather than one claim in each count. For these reasons, the Court will

dismiss the Complaint with leave to file a First Amended Complaint using this District’s

approved form. Any amended complaint must be legibly written and must substantially

comply with the Instructions for completing the form complaint. In the following sections,

the Court informs Plaintiff of the standard to state the types of claims he appears to be

attempting to raise. 

V. Standard to State a Claim Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts supporting that (1) the

conduct about which he complains was committed by a person acting under the color of state

law and (2) the conduct deprived him of a federal constitutional or statutory right. Wood v.

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 5 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 6 -

Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1989). In addition, to state a valid constitutional

claim, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific injury as a result of the conduct of

a particular defendant and he must allege an affirmative link between the injury and the

conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). 

A. Retaliation

Plaintiff designates Count I as a claim for retaliation. To state a constitutional claim

for retaliation, a plaintiff must allege that a defendant acting under color of state law took

adverse action against him because he engaged in constitutionally-protected conduct, the

adverse action was not narrowly tailored to advance legitimate goals, and the adverse action

chilled the plaintiff’s exercise of his First Amendment rights or caused him to suffer more

than minimal harm. Rhodes v. Robinson, 408 F.3d 559, 567-58 (9th Cir. 2005); see also

Hines v. Gomez, 108 F.3d 265, 267 (9th Cir. 1997) (retaliation claims requires an inmate

must show (1) that the prison official acted in retaliation for the exercise of a constitutionallyprotected right, and (2) that the action “advanced no legitimate penological interest”).

B. Medical Care

Plaintiff designates Count II as a claim concerning medical care. Not every claim by

a prisoner relating to inadequate medical treatment states a violation of the Eighth or

Fourteenth Amendment. To state a § 1983 medical claim, a plaintiff must show that the

defendants acted with “deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.” Jett v. Penner, 439

F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)). A

plaintiff must show (1) a “serious medical need” by demonstrating that failure to treat the

condition could result in further significant injury or the unnecessary and wanton infliction

of pain and (2) the defendant’s response was deliberately indifferent. Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096

(quotations omitted).

 “Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard.” Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051,

1060 (9th Cir. 2004). To act with deliberate indifference, a prison official must both know

of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate health; “the official must both be aware of facts

from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 6 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 7 -

he must also draw the inference.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). Deliberate

indifference in the medical context may be shown by a purposeful act or failure to respond

to a prisoner’s pain or possible medical need and harm caused by the indifference. Jett, 439

F.3d at 1096. Deliberate indifference may also be shown when a prison official intentionally

denies, delays, or interferes with medical treatment or by the way prison doctors respond to

the prisoner’s medical needs. Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104-05; Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096. 

Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary due

care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835. “Neither negligence nor gross

negligence will constitute deliberate indifference.” Clement v. California Dep’t of

Corrections, 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1105 (N.D. Cal. 2002); see also Broughton v. Cutter

Labs., 622 F.2d 458, 460 (9th Cir. 1980) (mere claims of “indifference,” “negligence,” or

“medical malpractice” do not support a claim under § 1983). “A difference of opinion does

not amount to deliberate indifference to [a plaintiff’s] serious medical needs.” Sanchez v.

Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). A mere delay in medical care, without more, is

insufficient to state a claim against prison officials for deliberate indifference. See Shapley

v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir. 1985). The indifference

must be substantial. The action must rise to a level of “unnecessary and wanton infliction

of pain.” Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105.

C. Disciplinary Proceedings

Plaintiff also appears to be attempting to challenge disciplinary proceedings at the jail.

A pretrial detainee has a substantive due process right against restrictions that amount to

punishment for a criminal offense. Valdez v. Rosenbaum, 302 F.3d 1039, 1045 (9th Cir.

2002) (citing United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 746 (1987); Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S.

520, 535 (1979); Redman v. County of San Diego, 942 F.2d 1435, 1440-41 (9th Cir.1991)

(en banc)). This right is violated if restrictions are “imposed for the purpose of punishment.”

Bell, 441 U.S. at 535. But jail officials are entitled to impose restrictions to effect

confinement, and detention will necessarily affect a detainee’s ability to live as comfortably

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 7 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

 Thus:

Not every disability imposed during pretrial detention amounts to

“punishment” in the constitutional sense, however. Once the Government has

exercised its conceded authority to detain a person pending trial, it obviously

is entitled to employ devices that are calculated to effectuate this detention.

Traditionally, this has meant confinement in a facility which, no matter how

modern or how antiquated, results in restricting the movement of a detainee in

a manner in which he would not be restricted if he simply were free to walk

the streets pending trial. Whether it be called a jail, a prison, or a custodial

center, the purpose of the facility is to detain. Loss of freedom of choice and

privacy are inherent incidents of confinement in such a facility. And the fact

that such detention interferes with the detainee’s understandable desire to live

as comfortably as possible and with as little restraint as possible during

confinement does not convert the conditions or restrictions of detention into

“punishment.”

Bell, 441 U.S. at 537.

JDDL-K - 8 -

as he might like; a de minimis level of imposition is permissible.5 Id. at 539 n.21. Thus, no

unconstitutional punishment occurs when the government imposes restrictions as part of

legitimate operational concerns to ensure security and order. Id. at 540. However,

imposition of punishment for violation of rules does require the procedural protections

described by the Supreme Court in Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 565-66 (1974).

Mitchell v. Dupnik, 75 F.3d 517, 524 (9th Cir. 1996). These safeguards are: (1) written

notice of the charges at least twenty-four hours prior to the hearing; (2) a written statement

by the fact-finder as to the evidence relied on and reasons for the disciplinary action; and (3)

a limited right to call witnesses and present documentary evidence when it would not be

unduly hazardous to institutional safety or correctional goals to allow the inmate to do so.

Wolff, 418 U.S. at 565-66. Thus, to assert a claim for denial of due process in connection

with disciplinary proceedings, a plaintiff must allege the circumstances surrounding the

disciplinary charge, the safeguard(s) he was allegedly denied, and the punishment imposed.

D. Access to the Courts

Plaintiff also appears to be attempting to allege a claim for denial of access to the

courts. The right of meaningful access to the courts prohibits state officials from actively

interfering with an inmate’s attempt to prepare or file legal documents. Lewis v. Casey, 518

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 8 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 9 -

U.S. 343, 350 (1996). That right, however, only encompasses the ability to bring petitions

or complaints to federal court and not to discover or even effectively litigate such claims

once filed with a court. Id. at 354; see also Cornett v. Donovan, 51 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir.

1995) (“The right of access is designed to ensure that a habeas petition or civil rights

complaint of a person in state custody will reach a court for consideration.”) The right

“guarantees no particular methodology but rather, the conferral of a capability – the

capability of bringing contemplated challenges to sentences or conditions of confinement

before the courts.” Lewis, 518 U.S. at 356. Further, the denial of access to a paralegal or use

of a law library is not actionable if there is no claim of prejudice to an existing or future legal

action. Id. at 351-53. That is, an inmate must establish that he suffered an “actual injury”

when he alleges a denial of access to the courts. See Vandelft v. Moses, 31 F.3d 794, 797

(9th Cir. 1994). An “actual injury” is “actual prejudice with respect to contemplated or

existing litigation, such as the inability to meet a filing deadline or present a claim.” Lewis,

518 U.S. at 348. In other words, a plaintiff must allege facts to support that a defendant’s

conduct prevented him from bringing to court a non-frivolous claim that he wished to

present. Id. at 351-53. A plaintiff “must identify a nonfrivolous, arguable underlying claim,”

and this underlying claim “must be described in the complaint.” Christopher v. Harbury, 536

U.S. 403, 414-15 (2002). 

E. Denial of Access to Counsel

Plaintiff appears in part to assert the he was denied access to telephone

communication with his criminal defense attorney. An inmate retains First Amendment free

speech rights not inconsistent with his status as a prisoner and with the legitimate penological

objectives of the corrections system. See Shaw v. Murphy, 532 U.S. 223, 231 (2001);

Clement v. California Dep’t of Corr., 364 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir. 2004). However, jail

personnel may regulate speech if such restriction is reasonably related to legitimate

penological interests and an inmate is not deprived of all means of expression. Valdez, 302

F.3d at 1048 (citing Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 92 (1986)). The United States

Constitution does not provide for an unfettered right to use a telephone. Rather, to state a

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 9 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 10 -

constitutional claim, a plaintiff must allege that the use of a phone is connected to another

constitutional right, such as the right of free speech or access to the courts. Even then, a

telephone is only one means for an inmate to exercise the extremely limited First Amendment

right to communicate with persons outside the jail. Valdez, 302 F.3d at 1048. That same

right may be met through other means such as correspondence or personal visits. 

F. Search and Seizure

Plaintiff also appears to be attempting to assert a claim for violation of his Fourth

Amendment rights concerning searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment guarantees

the right of the people to be secure against unreasonable searches, and its protections are not

extinguished upon incarceration. Michenfelder v. Sumner, 860 F.2d 328, 322-33 (9th Cir.

1988). However, the Fourth Amendment “proscription against unreasonable searches does

not apply within the confines of the prison cell. The recognition of privacy rights for

prisoners in their individual cells simply cannot be reconciled with the concept of

incarceration and needs and objectives of penal institutions.” Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S.

517, 525-26 (l984). Nevertheless, the Fourth Amendment has been held to apply to the

invasion of bodily privacy. Michenfelder, 860 F.2d at 332. Thus, strip searches that are

excessive, vindictive, harassing, or unrelated to any legitimate penological interest may

violate the Fourth Amendment. Id. But, a policy of routinely strip searching arrestees for

contraband has been held not to be unreasonable where there is no physical contact and the

searches are professionally conducted in relative privacy. Bull v. City and County of San

Francisco, 595 F.3d 964, 973 (9th Cir. 2010).

F. Excessive Force

Plaintiff also appears to be attempting to assert that some jail staff used excessive

force against him. The Fourth Amendment applies to excessive force claims by pretrial

detainees. See Lolli v. County of Orange, 351 F.3d 410, 415 (9th Cir. 2003). Officials

acting under color of state law may not maliciously and sadistically use force for the purpose

of causing harm. Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 7 (1992); Watts v. McKinney, 394 F.3d

710, 711 (9th Cir. 2005). To state a claim for excessive force, a plaintiff must allege facts

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 10 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 11 -

to support that an official used or caused to be used objectively unreasonable force against

him. See Brosseau v. Haugen, 543 U.S. 194, 197 (2004). Analysis of an excessive force

claim requires “balancing the ‘nature and quality of the intrusion’ on a person’s liberty with

the ‘countervailing governmental interest at stake’ to determine whether the use of force was

objectively reasonable under the circumstances.” Drummond v. City of Anaheim, 343 F.3d

1052, 1056 (9th Cir. 2003) (citations omitted); see also Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 395

(1989).

V. Leave to Amend

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state

a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first

amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail

Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails

to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended complaint and dismiss this

action without further notice to Plaintiff.

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First

Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. 

A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963

F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542,

1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original complaint as

nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original

complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d

565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

VI. Warnings

A. Release

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.

Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 11 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 12 -

the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result

in dismissal of this action.

B. Address Changes

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

action.

C. Copies

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice

to Plaintiff.

D. Possible “Strike”

Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails

to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the

dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil

judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior

occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a

court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious,

or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

E. Possible Dismissal

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at

1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the

Court).

IT IS ORDERED: 

(1) Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. (Doc. 17.)

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 12 of 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 13 -

(2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency,

Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee.

(3) Plaintiff’s motions to waive fees are denied. (Doc. 19, 23.)

(4) Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application filed on January 4, 2012 is denied as

moot. (Doc. 20.)

(5) Plaintiff’s motion to proceed is construed as a motion for status, which is

granted to the extent set forth herein. (Doc. 27.) 

(6) Plaintiff’s Amended Complaints are ordered stricken for failure to comply with

LR Civ. 3.4 by using the approved form. (Doc. 8, 14.) 

(7) The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff has

30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with

this Order on this Court’s approved form complaint. 

(8) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of

Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice

that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

(9) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil

rights complaint by a prisoner.

DATED this 15th day of February, 2012.

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 13 of 23
Revised 3/9/07 1

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint 

in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated

persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These

complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form

should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state

conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas

corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence,

you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that

entered the judgment. 

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by

incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or

neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All

questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If

needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard

letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and

number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional

or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to

cite law. 

3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of

a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.

4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately

pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the

“Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in

Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.

5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and

of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court

if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be

identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.

6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined

when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined

in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were

confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott

Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file

in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing

fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 14 of 23
2

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR Tucson Division:

U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. District Court Clerk

U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500

401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 405 West Congress Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing

of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your

mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.

8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you

submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis).

Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma

pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date

a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed.

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a

certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed

this (month, day, year) to:

Name: 

Address: 

 Attorney for Defendant(s)

 

(Signature)

9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,

you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave

(permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R.

Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to

amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an

amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv

15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are

considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison

Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time.

10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint.

Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use

to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.

11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff

of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written

pleading or motion.

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 15 of 23
3

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.

HEADING:

1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing

address on the lines provided.

2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you

name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line,

write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the

names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-

A” at the bottom.

3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED”

in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do

so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are

seeking only injunctive relief.

Part A. JURISDICTION:

1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics

Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of

that authority. 

2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights

occurred. 

3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the

spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the

necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,”

“2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.

Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:

You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while

you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces

provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary

information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-

B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.

Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:

You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to

allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three

counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate

page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page

5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 16 of 23
4

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the

violation of only one civil right per count.

2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your

claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,”

you must identify the specific issue involved.

3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must

state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each

individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you

must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which

the act(s) occurred, if possible.

4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.

5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies

before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you

should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or

administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures

were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.

Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:

Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. 

SIGNATURE:

You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign

the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not

bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE

You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your

complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper

space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional

pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach

additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and

number the pages.

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 17 of 23
Revised 3/9/07 1 550/555

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

)

 , )

(Full Name of Plaintiff) Plaintiff, )

)

 vs. ) CASE NO. 

) (To be supplied by the Clerk)

(1) , )

(Full Name of Defendant) )

(2) , )

) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

(3) ,) BY A PRISONER

)

(4) , ) G Original Complaint

Defendant(s). ) G First Amended Complaint

G Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them. ) G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION

1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:

G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983

G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

G Other: .

2. Institution/city where violation occurred: .

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 18 of 23
2

B. DEFENDANTS

1. Name of first Defendant: . The first Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

2. Name of second Defendant: . The second Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

3. Name of third Defendant: . The third Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

4. Name of fourth Defendant: . The fourth Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS

1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? G Yes G No

2. If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed? . Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:

1. Parties: v. 

2. Court and case number: .

3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.

b. Second prior lawsuit:

1. Parties: v. 

2. Court and case number: .

3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.

c. Third prior lawsuit:

1. Parties: v. 

2. Court and case number: .

3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 19 of 23
3

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

COUNT I

1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: 

.

2. Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.

G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what

each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without

citing legal authority or arguments.

.

4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.

5. Administrative Remedies:

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available

at your institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why

you did not. 

.

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 20 of 23
4

COUNT II

1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: 

.

2. Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.

G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what

each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without

citing legal authority or arguments.

.

4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.

5. Administrative Remedies.

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available

at your institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why

you did not. 

.

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 21 of 23
5

COUNT III

1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: 

.

2. Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.

G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what

each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without

citing legal authority or arguments.

.

4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.

5. Administrative Remedies.

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available

at your institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why

you did not. 

.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 22 of 23
6

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF

State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on 

DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or

other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES

All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may

attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent

applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued

and number all pages.

Case 2:11-cv-02261-RCB--MHB Document 28 Filed 02/16/12 Page 23 of 23