Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_20-cv-01153/USCOURTS-cand-4_20-cv-01153-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -1- Case No. 4:20-cv-01153-HSG

SMRH:4828-3575-6728.3 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

FRED R. PUGLISI, Cal. Bar No. 121822 

JAY T. RAMSEY, Cal. Bar No. 273160 

VALERIE E. ALTER, Cal. Bar No. 239905 

ALEXANDRA M. JACKSON, Cal. Bar. No. 327689 

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600 

Los Angeles, California 90067-6055 

Telephone: 310.228.3700 

Facsimile: 310.228.3701 

E mail fpuglisi@sheppardmullin.com jramsey@sheppardmullin.com 

valter@sheppardmullin.com ajackson@sheppardmullin.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

LENDINGCLUB CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

LUKA ERCEG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LENDINGCLUB CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

 Case No. 4:20-cv-01153-HSG 

SECOND STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Courtroom 2 – 4th Floor 

 

Case 4:20-cv-01153-HSG Document 23 Filed 04/07/20 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -2- Case No. 4:20-cv-01153-HSG

SMRH:4828-3575-6728.3 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and N.D. Cal. Local Rule 6, Plaintiff Luka 

Erceg (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant LendingClub Corporation (“Defendant”), by and 

through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, on February 13, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in the abovecaptioned action; 

WHEREAS, Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint was originally 

Wednesday, March 11, 2020; 

WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred, and agreed that extending 

Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint by 30 days to Friday, April 10, 2020 

was appropriate to allow Defendant time to investigate the allegations in the 

Complaint and formulate a response and for the parties to discuss potential 

resolution; 

WHEREAS, all levels of government in the United States have now ordered 

citizens to engage in “social distancing” due to the current pandemic facing our 

country and, as a result of those orders and several “shelter in place” or “stay at 

home” orders, counsel for Defendant and in-house counsel at Defendant, have been 

working from home; 

WHEREAS, as a result of the foregoing issues related to the COVID-19 

emergency, Defendants have been unable to complete their investigations so that 

they can properly respond to the complaint; 

WHEREAS, the parties have again met and conferred and agreed that, in the 

interest of protecting the court, themselves, their attorneys, their clients, and the 

community, they will extend the current deadline to respond to the Complaint by 

another 14 days to allow Defendant time to investigate the allegations in the 

Complaint and formulate a response and for the parties to discuss potential 

resolution; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6, the foregoing extension will not alter 

the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order; 

Case 4:20-cv-01153-HSG Document 23 Filed 04/07/20 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -3- Case No. 4:20-cv-01153-HSG

SMRH:4828-3575-6728.3 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the 

parties that Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint be extended to Friday, 

April 24, 2020. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 1, 2020 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

By /s/ Fred R. Puglisi 

 FRED R. PUGLISI 

JAY T. RAMSEY 

VALERIE E. ALTER 

ALEXANDRA M. JACKSON 

Attorneys for Defendant 

LENDINGCLUB CORPORATION 

Dated: April 1, 2020 LEXANALYTICA, PC 

By /s/ Perry Narancic 

 PERRY NARANCIC 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

LUKA ERCEG 

ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 

I, Alexandra M. Jackson, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being 

used to file the foregoing document in compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3). I attest 

that the above signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is being submitted, 

concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing of this stipulation. 

Dated: April 1, 2020 

By /s/ Alexandra M. Jackson 

 ALEXANDRA M. JACKSON 

Case 4:20-cv-01153-HSG Document 23 Filed 04/07/20 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -4- Case No. 4:20-cv-01153-HSG

SMRH:4828-3575-6728.3 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

ORDER 

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s deadline to respond to the 

Complaint is extended to April 24, 2020. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

United States District Court Judge

4/7/2020

Case 4:20-cv-01153-HSG Document 23 Filed 04/07/20 Page 4 of 4