Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00308/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00308-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 16:1538 Endangered Species Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA STATE GRANGE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES

SERVICE, et al.,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:06-cv-0308 OWW DLB

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER 

(See Schedule Below) 

I. Date of Scheduling Conference.

August 18, 2006.

II. Appearances Of Counsel.

Russell C. Brooks, Esq., appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs.

Paul D. Lall, Esq., Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of

Justice, appeared on behalf of Defendants. 

III. Schedule of Case.

1. It is stipulated that this case is exempt from initial

disclosures under F.R.C.P. 26(a)(1)(E).

2. Federal Defendants shall file the Administrative Record

of the decision to list the challenged populations of O. mykiss

in California as threatened or endangered species under the

Case 1:06-cv-00308-OWW -DLB Document 17 Filed 08/21/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Endangered Species Act by September 22, 2006. The parties agree

that the Administrative Record may be filed on a CD-ROM. If so

filed, each party will provide the Court with hard copies of any

documents cited by that party during the briefing.

3. The last date to file motions directed to the

sufficiency and completeness of the Administrative Record will be

by October 6, 2006. 

4. The parties agree that in this case the Administrative

Record does not need to be supplemented or augmented. There is

no need for extra-record discovery or submission of evidence. 

Nor is there any need for expert testimony. 

5. Oppositions to the motions for Administrative Record

will be October 20, 2006. Responses shall be filed by October

27, 2006. The motions will be heard November 13, 2006, at 10:00

a.m. 

6. The parties’ motions for summary judgment shall be

filed as follows: 

a. Plaintiff will file their motion for summary

judgment on or before October 10, 2006. 

b. Defendants will file their opposition and crossmotion for summary judgment by November 9, 2006. 

c. Plaintiffs shall file their reply in their motion

for summary judgment and their opposition to Defendant’s crossmotion by November 20, 2006.

d. Defendants will file their reply by December 15,

2006. 

e. The hearing on the motions for summary judgment

shall be January 8, 2007, in Courtroom 3 at 10:00 a.m. The Court

Case 1:06-cv-00308-OWW -DLB Document 17 Filed 08/21/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

has reserved time for extended oral argument.

7. Any settlement conference in this case will be set in

accordance with outcome of dispositive motions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 18, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00308-OWW -DLB Document 17 Filed 08/21/06 Page 3 of 3