Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03965/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03965-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

-1- CASE NO. 05-03965 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE BRANDI LAW FIRM

THOMAS J. BRANDI Bar No. 53208

TERENCE D. EDWARDS Bar No. 168095

BRIAN J. MALLOY Bar No. 234882

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1050

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 989-1800

Facsimile: (415) 989-1801

tjb@brandilaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DANIEL HEMENEZ

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

BRUCE D. CELEBREZZE Bar No. 102181

DENNIS G. ROLSTAD Bar No. 150006

MICHELLE Y. MCISAAC Bar No. 215294

One Market Plaza

Steuart Tower, 8th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 781-7900

Facsimile: (415) 781-2635

dennis.rolstad@sdma.com

Attorneys for Defendant

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE 

COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DANIEL HEMENEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT 

INSURANCE CO., HARTFORD LIFE 

AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. 

GROUP INSURANCE POLICY, C&H 

SUGAR COMPANY, INC., and C&H 

SALARIED EMPLOYEES BENEFIT 

PLAN,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 05-03965 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO DISMISS DEFENDANT C&H

SUGAR COMPANY, INC. 

Case 3:05-cv-03965-WHA Document 17 Filed 11/15/05 Page 1 of 2
-2- CASE NO. 05-03965 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Daniel Hemenez (“Hemenez”) and defendant Hartford Life and Accident 

Insurance Company (“Hartford”), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby STIPULATE 

and AGREE that defendant C&H Sugar Company, Inc. (“C&H”) may be dismissed without

prejudice from the above entitled action brought by Hemenez for the recovery of long term 

disability benefits under C&H’s employee welfare benefit plan governed by the Employee 

Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). C&H’s long term disability plan, which is the 

subject of Hemenez’s action, is insured under a group long term disability policy issued by 

Hartford.

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

DATED: November 14, 2005 THE BRANDI LAW FIRM

By: s/Brian J. Malloy

THOMAS J. BRANDI

TERENCE D. EDWARDS

BRIAN J. MALLOY

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DANIEL HEMENEZ

DATED: November 14, 2005 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

By:s/Michelle Y. McIsaac

DENNIS G. ROLSTAD

MICHELLE Y. MCISAAC

Attorneys for Defendant

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE 

COMPANY

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

November 15, 2005

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:05-cv-03965-WHA Document 17 Filed 11/15/05 Page 2 of 2