Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01621/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01621-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CLIFFORD ABREU, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MATTHEW L. CATE, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 10-cv-1621 JAM CKD P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On July 1, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:10-cv-01621-JAM-CKD Document 62 Filed 09/05/13 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 1, 2013, are adopted in full; 

 2. Defendants’ November 20, 2013 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 54) is 

granted in part and denied in part as follows: 

 A. Granted with respect to plaintiff’s claims arising under the Americans with 

 Disabilities Act; 

 B. Granted as to plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against defendants 

 Williams, Cate, Subia, and Martel; and 

 C. Denied as to plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Miranda, 

 Robinson, Davis and Smith. 

 3. Plaintiff shall file his pretrial statement within 30 days. Plaintiff’s failure to file a 

pretrial statement within 30 days will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

 4. All remaining defendants shall file their pretrial statement or statements within 21 days 

of service of plaintiff’s. 

DATED: September 4, 2013 

 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

 

Case 2:10-cv-01621-JAM-CKD Document 62 Filed 09/05/13 Page 2 of 2