Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01144/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01144-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW A. CEJAS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1144 LKK PAN P

vs.

LOU BLANAS,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a state pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with

a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. By order filed January 6,

2006, petitioner was ordered to show, within thirty days, why this court should not abstain

pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's 

Case 2:05-cv-01144-LKK -PAN Document 16 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 27, 2006.

/001; ceja1144.fsc

Case 2:05-cv-01144-LKK -PAN Document 16 Filed 02/28/06 Page 2 of 2