Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01120/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01120-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 On March 14, 2007, plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Suryadevara arising from Dr. 1

Ashraf’s medical report containing false information and defendant Spaeder’s statement to plaintiff were dismissed

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted against them under section 1983, and defendants

Patrick, Tilton, Dovey, Sillen, Schwarzenegger, Iyer, Cane, Karr, Bennie, Orong, Heskitt, and Spaeder were

dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted against them under section

1983. (Doc. 16.) 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CECILIA FRAHER,

Plaintiff,

v.

SURYDEVARA,

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01120-AWI-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF AMENDED

COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE, AND

FORWARDING SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO

PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND

RETURN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. 16)

Plaintiff Cecilia Fraher (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on August

21, 2006. The court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and

found that it states a cognizable claim for relief under section 1983 against defendant Suryadevara

for acting with deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth

Amendment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 512-15 (2002); 1

Austin v. Terhune, 367 F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2004); Jackson v. Carey, 353 F.3d 750, 754 (9th

Cir. 2003); Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara, 307 F.3d 1119, 1125-26 (9th Cir. 2002).

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

Case 1:06-cv-01120-AWI -MJS Document 18 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendant:

DR. SAMPATH SURYADEVARA

2. The Clerk of the Courtshall send plaintiff one (1) USM-285 form, one (1) summons,

a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

amended complaint filed October 23, 2006.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Two (2) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed October 23, 2006.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendant and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendant pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 21, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01120-AWI -MJS Document 18 Filed 03/22/07 Page 2 of 2