Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00184/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00184-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 On September 18, 2006, defendants Schwarzenegger, Woodford, and Hickman, and the State of California 1

and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to the extent plaintiff intended to name them as

defendants, were dismissed, and plaintiff’s claims for declaratory relief and an injunction prohibiting enforcement of

the grooming regulation were dismissed. (Doc. 17.) 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAKLA JOSEPH,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. S. WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-00184-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF AMENDED

COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE AND

FORWARDING SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO

PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND

RETURN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. 14) 

Plaintiff Shakla Joseph (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1, the Religious Land Use and

Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA). Plaintiff filed this action on February 9, 2005. The

court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and found that it stated

cognizable claims for relief under RLUIPA against defendants Daviega, Pursell, Hooker, Fulks,

Anderson, Flore, and Adams. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 1

512-15 (2002); Austin v. Terhune, 367 F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2004); Jackson v. Carey, 353 F.3d

750, 754 (9th Cir. 2003); Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara, 307 F.3d 1119, 1125-26 (9th Cir.

2002). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

Case 1:05-cv-00184-LJO-SMS Document 18 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

C/O B. DAVIEGA

C/O R. PURSELL

LT. E. HOOKER 

D. FULKS, ASSOCIATE WARDEN

STEVE ANDERSON

SGT. P. FLORE

DERRAL G. ADAMS, WARDEN

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff seven (7) USM-285 forms, seven (7)

summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the amended complaint filed December 7, 2005.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Eight (8) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed December 7, 2005.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 20, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00184-LJO-SMS Document 18 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 2