Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01510/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01510-80/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The parties were expressly requested to limit their answers “to what is disclosed in the

existing summary judgment record.” Despite this clear request, the Schwab defendants cited to

and filed a new declaration — the Taylor Declaration. If this was intended to simply supply

convenient copies of material already in the summary judgment record, the Court thanks counsel,

although it was unnecessary. The declaration, however, appears to include material that was

not in the existing summary judgment record. The Schwab defendants, by NOON TODAY, shall

please (1) file a declaration reciting where each precise item in the Taylor Declaration can already

be found in the existing summary judgment record, and (2) SHOW CAUSE why each item not in the

existing summary judgment record should not be stricken.

If plaintiffs reference to material outside the existing summary judgment record, also

please advise by NOON TODAY. For example, was the Charles Schwab New Guide to Financial

Independence quote in the existing summary judgment record?

Dated: April 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 580 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 1