Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04065/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04065-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

[06-CV-04065-MJJ] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT - 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. (SBN 75484) 

Email: jtabacco@bermanesq.com 

Christopher T. Heffelfinger (SBN 118058) 

Email: cheffelfinger@bermanesq.com 

Nicole Lavallee (SBN 165755) 

Email: nlavallee@bermanesq.com 

Lesley Ann Hale (SBN 237726) 

Email: lhale@bermanesq.com 

BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO 

BURT & PUCILLO 

425 California Street, Suite 2100 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-3200 

Facsimile: (415) 433-6382 

Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee and Liaison Counsel 

[Additional counsel appear on signature page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT L. GARBER, on behalf of himself 

and all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, EDWARD 

W. BARNHOLT, H. RAYMOND 

BINGHAM, ROBERT T. BOND, RICHARD 

J. ELKUS, JR., JEFFREY HALL, STEPHEN 

P. KAUFMAN, JOHN H. KISPERT, 

KENNETH LEVY, KENNETH L. 

SCHROEDER, JON D. TOMKINS and LIDA 

URBANEK, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

NO. 06-CV-04065-MJJ 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ 

TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED 

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT, 

ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

FOR RESPONSIVE MOTION(S) AND 

VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 78 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 8
 Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 80 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 8
[06-CV-04065-MJJ] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT - 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT 

SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and 

LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE 

EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, On 

Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 

situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, EDWARD 

W. BARNHOLT, H. RAYMOND 

BINGHAM, ROBERT T. BOND, RICHARD 

J. ELKUS, JR., JEFFREY HALL, STEPHEN 

P. KAUFMAN, JOHN H. KISPERT, 

KENNETH LEVY, KENNETH L. 

SCHROEDER, JON D. TOMKINS and LIDA 

URBANEK, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

NO. 06-CV-04709-MHP 

STANLEY D. SPILMAN, on behalf of 

himself and all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, EDWARD 

W. BARNHOLT, H. RAYMOND 

BINGHAM, ROBERT T. BOND, RICHARD 

J. ELKUS, JR., JEFFREY HALL, STEPHEN 

P. KAUFMAN, JOHN H. KISPERT, 

KENNETH LEVY, KENNETH L. 

SCHROEDER, JON D. TOMKINS and LIDA 

URBANEK, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

NO. 06-CV-05225-WHA 

Lead Plaintiffs Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“PFRS”) 

(formerly known as the Policemen and Firemen Retirement System of the City of Detroit), the 

Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System (“MPERS”) and The City of 

Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement (“City of Philadelphia”), and defendants KLATencor Corporation “KLA-Tencor”), Edward W. Barnholt, H. Raymond Bingham, Robert T. 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 78 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 2 of 8
 Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 80 Filed 11/27/06 Page 2 of 8
[06-CV-04065-MJJ] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT - 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Bond, Richard J. Elkus, Jr., Jeffrey Hall, Stephen P. Kaufman, John H. Kispert, Kenneth Levy, 

Kenneth L. Schroeder, Jon D. Tompkins and Lida Urbanek (“Defendants”), by and through their 

respective counsel hereby recite and stipulate, subject to court approval, as follows concerning 

modification of the briefing schedule: 

RECITALS 

 WHEREAS Plaintiff Robert L. Garber, on behalf of himself and all others similarly 

situated, filed a securities class action complaint on or about June 29, 2006; 

 WHEREAS the Court issued an Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and 

ADR Deadlines in this case, scheduling an Initial Case Management Conference for October 3, 

2006, and setting related deadlines; 

WHEREAS, on August 28, 2006, four different groups of investors filed motions for 

appointment as lead plaintiffs in this action and appointment of their counsel as lead counsel 

pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B): (i) PFRS and MPERS; (ii) The City of Philadelphia; (iii) 

individual Stephen Davidson; and (iv) individual Stanley D. Spilman; 

WHEREAS, on October 13, 2006, the Court entered an order consolidating the related 

class action complaints and appointing PFRS, MPERS and the City of Philadelphia as Lead 

Plaintiffs and Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo, Kohn, Swift & Graf. P.C., 

Berger & Montague, P.C. and Trujillo Rodriguez & Richards LLC as members of an executive 

committee representing the class, with Berman DeValerio also acting as Liaison Counsel; 

WHEREAS Lead Plaintiffs intend to file a consolidated class action complaint 

(“Consolidated Complaint”); 

WHEREAS Defendants intend to file motion(s) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12 in response to the Consolidated Complaint; 

WHEREAS, prior to the appointment of Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel, the individual 

plaintiffs in this action agreed to a briefing schedule with defense counsel; 

WHEREAS, subject to Court approval, the parties have agreed that Lead Plaintiffs may 

file and serve the Consolidated Complaint on or before December 12, 2006; that Defendants 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 78 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 3 of 8
 Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 80 Filed 11/27/06 Page 3 of 8
[06-CV-04065-MJJ] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT - 4 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

shall file and serve their responsive pleading(s) or motion(s) within 45 days after the filing of the 

Consolidated Complaint; that Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition brief(s) within 

45 days after the filing of any such motion(s); and that Defendants shall file and serve their reply 

brief(s) within 15 days after the filing of the opposition brief(s). 

WHEREAS, in light of KLA-Tencor’s announcement on October 16, 2006, that it intends 

to restate its financial statements in connection with the matters at issue in this action, and 

because such restatement will not likely occur prior to December 12, 2006, Lead Counsel has 

informed counsel for Defendants that Lead Plaintiffs reserve their right to amend the 

Consolidated Complaint within thirty (30) days following a release of the restatement by KLATencor. In an effort to avoid unnecessary briefing and burden on the Court and the parties, both 

Lead Counsel and Counsel for Defendants have discussed that they will confer with each other 

immediately prior to Lead Plaintiffs filing their Consolidated Complaint for the purpose of 

determining if there is, at that time, a reasonably certain date by when KLA-Tencor anticipates 

filing its restated financial statements and, whether in light of that date, it makes sense to enter 

into a further scheduling stipulation subject to approval by the Court. 

STIPULATION 

 Now, therefore, the parties agree and stipulate as follows subject to Court approval: 

1. Every pleading in this Consolidated Action shall bear the following caption: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE KLA-TENCOR CORP. SECURITIES 

LITIGATION 

 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 

Master File No. 06-cv-04065-MJJ 

CLASS ACTION

[TITLE OF DOCUMENT] 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 78 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 4 of 8
 Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 80 Filed 11/27/06 Page 4 of 8
[06-CV-04065-MJJ] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT - 5 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. The last day for Lead Plaintiffs to file and serve the consolidated class action 

complaint is December 12, 2006. 

 3. Defendants need not respond to the complaints currently on file. Defendants shall 

file and serve their responsive pleading(s) or motions within 45 days after the filing of the 

consolidated class action complaint. 

 4. Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition brief(s) within 45 days after 

the filing of Defendants’ responsive pleading(s) or motions. 

 5. Defendants shall file and serve their reply briefs within 15 (fifteen) days after the 

filing of Lead Plaintiffs opposition brief(s). 

 6. Once the Court rules upon the motion to dismiss, the parties shall ask the Court to 

set a new date for the Case Management Conference. Accordingly, the Court’s July 28, 2006 

scheduling order is hereby vacated pending further order of the Court. 

DATED: November 15, 2006 BERMAN DEVALERIO PEASE TABACCO 

 BURT & PUCILLO 

 By: /s/ Lesley Ann Hale 

 LESLEY ANN HALE 

 Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. 

Nicole Lavallee 

 Christopher T. Heffelfinger 

 425 California Street, Suite 2100 

 San Francisco, CA 94104-2205 

 Telephone: (415) 433-3200 

 Facsimile: (415) 433-6382 

 

 Member of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee and 

 Liaison Counsel 

 KOHN, SWIFT & GRAF, P.C. 

Denis F. Sheils 

Joseph C. Kohn 

 William E. Hoese 

 One South Broad Street, Suite 2100 

 Philadelphia, PA 19107 

 Telephone: (215) 238-1700 

 Facsimile: (215) 238-1968 

 Email: dsheils@kohnswift.com 

 Email: jkohn@kohnswift.com 

 Email: whoese@kohnswift.com 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 78 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 5 of 8
 Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 80 Filed 11/27/06 Page 5 of 8
[06-CV-04065-MJJ] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT - 6 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 BERGER & MONTAGUE, P.C.

Sherrie R. Savett 

Douglas M. Risen 

1622 Locust Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Telephone: (215) 875-3000 

Facsimile: (215) 875-4604 

Email: ssavett@bm.net 

Email: drisen@bm.net 

 TRUJILLO RODRIGUEZ 

 & RICHARDS LLC

Kenneth I. Trujillo 

Ira Neil Richards 

Kathryn C. Harr 

1717 Arch Street, Suite 3838 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Telephone: (215) 731-9004 

Facsimile: (215) 731-9044 

Email: KITrujillo@trrlaw.com 

Email: ira@trrlaw.com 

Email: kharr@trrlaw.com 

Members of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee 

E-Filing Attestation

 I, Lesley Ann Hale, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

document. In compliance with General Order 45 X.B., I hereby attest that each of the 

signatories identified below has concurred in this filing. 

DATED: November 15, 2006 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 Joseph E. Floren 

Joseph E. Floren 

Franklin B. Gowdy 

Michael J. Lawson 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Telephone: (415) 442-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 442-1001 

Email: jfloren@morganlewis.com 

Email: fgowdy@morganlewis.com 

Email: Michael.lawson@morganlewis.com 

 

Attorneys for Defendants KLA-Tencor 

Corporation, Edward W. Barnholt, H. 

Raymond Bingham, Robert T. Bond, Richard 

J. Elkus, Jr., Jeffrey Hall, Stephen P. 

Kaufman, John H. Kispert and Lida Urbanek 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 78 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 6 of 8
 Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 80 Filed 11/27/06 Page 6 of 8
[06-CV-04065-MJJ] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT - 7 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: November ___, 2006 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 Michael J. Shepard 

Warrington S. Parker, III 

333 Bush Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-6000 

Facsimile: (415) 772-6268 

Email: michael.shepard@hellerehrman.com 

Email: warrington.parker@ hellerehrman.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Jon D. Tompkins

 DATED: November ___, 2006 DLA PIPER US LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 David A. Priebe 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 833-2056 

Facsimile : (650) 833-2001 

Email: david.priebe@dlapiper.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Kenneth L. Schroeder 

DATED: November ___, 2006 SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 Jeffrey S. Facter 

Patrick D. Robbins 

Alicia G. Huffman 

525 Market Street, Suite 1500 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 616-1100 

Facsimile: (415) 616-1199 

Email: jfacter@shearman.com 

Email: probbins@shearman.com

Email: ahuffman@shearman.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Kenneth Levy 

 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 78 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 7 of 8
 Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 80 Filed 11/27/06 Page 7 of 8
[06-CV-04065-MJJ] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT - 8 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

 1. Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve the consolidated class action complaint on or 

before December 12, 2006. 

 2. Defendants need not respond to the complaints currently on file. Defendants 

shall file and serve their responsive pleading(s) or motions within 45 days of the filing of the 

consolidated class action complaint. 

 3. Lead Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition brief(s) within 45 days of the 

filing of Defendants’ responsive pleading(s) or motions. 

 4. Defendants shall file and serve their reply briefs within 15 days of the filing of 

Lead Plaintiffs opposition brief(s). 

 5. The Court’s July 28, 2006 order is hereby vacated. Once the Court rules upon 

the Rule 12 motion(s), the parties shall request that the Court set a date for the Case 

Management Conference. 

DATED: November ___, 2006 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 78 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 8 of 8

27

Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 80 Filed 11/27/06 Page 8 of 8