Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00914/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00914-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICHOLAS MORAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

K. DUTRA, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

1:11-cv-914-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER VACATING ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RE-ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(ECF Nos. 12, 13, & 15)

Plaintiff Nicholas Moran (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations,

recommending dismissal of certain of Plaintiff’s claims and Defendants. (ECF No. 12.) The Court

adopted the Findings and Recommendations before the time for objections had run. (ECF No. 13.) 

Plaintiff filed objections on October 18, 2012. (ECF No. 15.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

analysis. 

///

///

///

///

-1-

Case 1:11-cv-00914-LJO-MJS Document 27 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court’s October 10, 2012 order adopting the Findings and Recommendations,

filed September 21, 2012 (ECF No. 13) is VACATED;

2. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 21, 2012, are adopted in full;

3. Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his Eighth Amendment inadequate medical care

claim against Defendants Ryan and Dedee;

4. Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his Eighth Amendment excessive force claim

against Defendants Dutra and Auten;

5. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants John Does # 1-20 be dismissed; and

6. Defendants John Does #1-20 be dismissed from this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 27, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill B9ed48

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

Case 1:11-cv-00914-LJO-MJS Document 27 Filed 02/28/13 Page 2 of 2