Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-279/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

SMRH:432338256.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

A Limited Liability Partnership 

Including Professional Corporations 

GARY L. HALLING, Cal. Bar No. 66087 

JAMES L. McGINNIS, Cal. Bar No. 95788 

MICHAEL W. SCARBOROUGH, Cal. Bar No. 203524 

DYLAN I. BALLARD, Cal. Bar No. 253929 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4106 

Telephone: 415-434-9100 

Facsimile: 415-434-3947 

E-mail: ghalling@sheppardmullin.com 

 jmcginnis@sheppardmullin.com 

 mscarborough@sheppardmullin.com 

 dballard@sheppardmullin.com 

 

HELEN C. ECKERT, Cal. Bar No. 240531 

333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071-1448 

Telephone: 213-620-1780 

Facsimile: 213-620-1398 

E-mail: heckert@sheppardmullin.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

 Case No. 07-5944 SC 

MDL No. 1917 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TO 

This Document Relates to: OCCUR AFTER SEPTEMBER 5, 2014 

CompuCom Systems, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., 

No. 11-cv-06396; 

Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v. Technicolor 

SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05724; 

Interbond Corporation of America v. 

Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05727;

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2878 Filed 10/02/14 Page 1 of 5
 -2-

SMRH:432338256.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Office Depot, Inc. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 

13-cv-05726; 

P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corp., et al. v. 

Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05725; 

Schultze Agency Services, LLC, et al. v. 

Technicolor SA, Ltd., et al., No. 13-cv-05668; 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2878 Filed 10/02/14 Page 2 of 5
 -1-

SMRH:432338256.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INTERBOND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. (“SDI Tianjin”) and Plaintiffs Interbond 

Corp., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corp., ABC Appliance Inc., Marta Cooperative of 

America, Inc., CompuCom Systems, Inc., Electrograph Systems Inc. and Electrograph Tech. 

Corp., Schultze Agency Services, LLC on behalf of Tweeter Opco, LLC and Tweeter Newco, 

LLC, and Office Depot (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have conferred by and through their counsel 

and, subject to the Court’s approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

WHEREAS, September 5, 2014 was the deadline to complete fact discovery in the 

above-captioned actions; 

WHEREAS, on August 1, 2014, SDI Tianjin served its First Set of Interrogatories 

(“SDI Tianjin’s Interrogatories”) on each of the Plaintiffs; 

WHEREAS, on September 5, 2014, Plaintiffs served objections and responses to 

SDI Tianjin’s Interrogatories; and 

WHEREAS, SDI Tianjin and Plaintiffs have conferred in good faith and agreed 

that Plaintiffs will serve supplemental objections and responses to SDI Tianjin Interrogatory Nos. 

6 and 8 regarding the specific Samsung entities from whom each Plaintiff purchased CRT 

Products no later than September 26, 2014; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between 

counsel for the undersigned parties as follows: 

1. Plaintiffs will serve supplemental objections and responses to SDI Tianjin 

Interrogatory Nos. 6 and 8 no later than September 26, 2014; and 

/// 

/// 

///

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2878 Filed 10/02/14 Page 3 of 5
 -2-

SMRH:432338256.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INTERBOND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. To the extent SDI Tianjin wishes to file a motion to compel with respect to 

item 1 above, it will do so no later than October 3, 2014. 

The undersigned parties respectfully request that this stipulation be entered as an 

Order of the Court. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:___________________ ___________________________________ 

Hon. Samuel Conti 

United States District Judge 

October 2, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2878 Filed 10/02/14 Page 4 of 5
 -3- SMRH:432338256.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INTERBOND DISCOVERY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: September 11, 2014 By: /s/ Helen C. Eckert 

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON 

LLP

Gary L. Halling, Cal. Bar No. 66087 

James L. McGinnis, Cal. Bar No. 95788 

Michael W. Scarborough, Cal. Bar No. 203524 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4109 

Telephone: (415) 434-9100 

Facsimile: (415) 434-3947 

E-mail: ghalling@sheppardmullin.com 

 jmcginnis@sheppardmullin.com 

 mscarborough@sheppardmullin.com 

 dballard@sheppardmullin.com 

HELEN C. ECKERT, Cal. Bar No. 240531 

333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071-1448 

Telephone: 213-620-1780 

Facsimile: 213-620-1398 

E-mail: heckert@sheppardmullin.com

Attorneys for Defendant Tianjin Samsung SDI 

Co., Ltd.

By: /s/ Philip J. Iovieno 

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

Philip J. Iovieno (pro hac vice) 

Anne M. Nardacci (pro hac vice) 

30 South Pearl Street, 11th Floor 

Albany, NY 12207 

Telephone: (518) 434-0600 

Facsimile: (518) 434-0665 

Email: piovieno@bsfllp.com 

anardacci@bsfllp.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Interbond Corp., P.C. 

Richard & Son Long Island Corp., ABC Appliance 

Inc., Marta Cooperative of America, Inc., 

CompuCom Systems, Inc., Electrograph Systems Inc. 

and Electrograph Tech. Corp., Schultze Agency 

Services, LLC on behalf of Tweeter Opco, LLC and 

Tweeter Newco, LLC, and Office Depot

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2878 Filed 10/02/14 Page 5 of 5