Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07916/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07916-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7916

CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIE EAGLETON, 

Warden of Evans Correctional Institution, Individual and 

official capacity; HIPP, Lieutenant, Individual and official 

capacity; EVANS CONTROL TRANSPORTATION AND CLASSIFICATION 

DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL, Individual and official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:08-cv-02596-RBH)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Dale Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, Heath 

McAlvin Stewart, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-7916 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/25/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Dale Richardson appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion to reconsider the order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. South 

Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 4:08-cv-02596-RBH (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7916 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/25/2010 Pg: 2 of 2