Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01039/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01039-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ESCOBEDO,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL MURRIETTA, dba Mike’s 

Grill, AND GEORGE G. BADASCI,

Defendants.

No. 1:15-cv-01039-DAD-SKO

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW 

CAUSE AND DIRECTING CLERK OF 

COURT TO SERVE DOCKET NUMBER 23, 

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER, ON 

DEFENDANT BADASCI

(Doc. No. 43)

On May 12, 2016, this court issued an order to show cause directing defendant George D. 

Badasci to show cause why he did not appear, either by telephone or in person, at the hearing on 

May 11, 2016. (Doc. No. 43.) Defendant Badasci responded by letter filed with the court on 

May 18, 2016, fully explaining his failure to appear at the hearing. (Doc. No. 45.) Accordingly, 

the court discharges the order to show cause and vacates the hearing that was set for May 31, 

2016. Defendant Badasci need not appear on that date.

Defendant Badasci is hereby specifically advised by the court that his attorney has been 

granted permission to withdraw as counsel of record for defendants in this action. (See Doc. No. 

44.) Therefore, defendant Badasci is now representing himself in this matter pro se. In 

representing himself, defendant Badasci will be required to comply with all Local Rules and the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in defending this action. The court encourages defendant 

Case 1:15-cv-01039-DAD-SKO Document 46 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Badasci to acquire a copy of his file related to this case from his former attorney, Mario Zamora. 

Additionally, the Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the Pretrial Scheduling Order (Doc. 

No. 23) upon defendant Badasci by mailing it to his address of record reflected on the court’s 

docket. Finally, defendant Badasci is advised that any amendment to the court’s Pretrial 

Scheduling Order must be sought in accordance with the Local Rules and the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 19, 2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01039-DAD-SKO Document 46 Filed 05/19/16 Page 2 of 2