Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-3_09-cv-00089/USCOURTS-ared-3_09-cv-00089-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

JONESBORO DIVISION

VALERIE EATON PLAINTIFF

v. CASE NO. 3:09CV00089 BSM

COASTAL ASSET MANAGEMENT DEFENDANT

ORDER

Plaintiff Valerie Eaton (Eaton) moves for default judgment (Doc. No. 11) against

defendant Coastal Asset Management (CAM). For the reasons stated below, Eaton’s motion

is granted.

Eaton filed her original motion for default judgment on July 20, 2009, (Doc. No. 2),

for CAM’s failure to respond to the June 8, 2009 complaint (Doc. No. 1). Eaton’s motion

was denied without prejudice for failing to properly serve CAM.

In her request for Clerk’s entry of default (Doc. No. 8), Eaton submitted proof of

service on Dana Koprowski, on October 24, 2009, at 1122 Summerview Lane, Huntington

Beach, California, 92648. (Exh. A). Service was conducted by certified process server, Krisi

Hernandez, 8750 Sepulveda Blvd #171, North Hills, CA. 91343. Eaton’s complaint alleges

that Dana Kaprowski is President of CAM (Pltf. Compl ¶ 9). Clerk’s default was entered

on November 24, 2009 (Doc. No. 10). Eaton now renews her motion for entry of default

judgment (Doc. No. 11).

Eaton’s motion for default judgment should be granted because the record indicates

that CAM has been properly served pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h).

Case 3:09-cv-00089-BSM Document 13 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2
2

Accordingly, the motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 11) is granted and judgment

is entered for plaintiff Valerie Eaton and against defendant Coastal Asset Management. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of January, 2010

 ________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00089-BSM Document 13 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2