Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05464/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05464-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SUSIE SHAWNEGO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05464-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 61)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS

CORTEZ AND SCRIBNER’S MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 47)

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANTS CORTEZ AND SCRIBNER,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BASED ON

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EXHAUST

Plaintiff Charles Johnson (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 10, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. 

To date, the parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate

Case 1:04-cv-05464-LJO -LJO Document 62 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 10, 2006,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Defendants Cortez and Scribner’s motion to dismiss

plaintiff’s claims against them for failure to exhaust the

available administrative remedies as mandated by 42 U.S.C.

§ 1997e(a), filed January 10, 2006, is GRANTED, and plaintiff’s

claims against defendants Cortez and Scribner are DISMISSED from

this action, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05464-LJO -LJO Document 62 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2