Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05278/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05278-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Contitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Judgment [CIV-F-04-5278 OWW DLB]

Rick W. Jarvis, SBN: 154479

Benjamin P. Fay, SBN: 178856

JARVIS, FAY & DOPORTO, LLP

475 14 Street, Suite 260 th

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 238-1400

Facsimile: (510) 238-1404

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF TURLOCK and TURLOCK CITY COUNCIL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware

corporation, and WAL-MART REAL

ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, a Delaware

statutory trust,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF TURLOCK, TURLOCK CITY

COUNCIL, and DOES 1 through 10,

inclusive,

Defendants. 

___________________________________/

CASE NO.: CIV-F-04-5278 OWW DLB

JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust (collectively, “WalMart”) filed a “Complaint for Damages, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief; Demand for Jury Trial” on

February 11, 2004. The Complaint alleged seven claims for relief against the defendants City of Turlock

and Turlock City Council (collectively, “the City”).

On March 29, 2005, the City moved for summary judgment on the complaint, including all

claims for relief contained within it. The motion was fully briefed by the parties and oral argument was

heard on February 6, 2006.

On July 3, 2006, this Court issued an Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary

Judgment. For the reasons set forth in that order, this Court hereby enters Judgment in favor of the City

Case 1:04-cv-05278-OWW -DLB Document 222 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Judgment [CIV-F-04-5278 OWW DLB]

and against Wal-Mart on the Complaint and on every claim for relief set forth within it.

As the prevailing party, the City is awarded its recoverable costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:____July 19, 2006______ _/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER____________

OLIVER W. WANGER

United States District Judge

G:\docs\GLucas\Orders To Be Signed\04cv5278.jgm.wpd

Case 1:04-cv-05278-OWW -DLB Document 222 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 2