Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02815/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02815-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MODESTA JACINTO,

Plaintiff,

v.

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC; WELLS 

FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE 

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION 

SYSTEMS, INC.; NATIONAL DEFAULT 

SERVICING CORPORATION; 

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-02815-MMC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE;

VACATING HEARING ON MOTION TO

DISMISS

Before the Court is the “Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint,” filed July 12, 

2016, by defendants Ditech Financial LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration 

Systems, Inc.,1and noticed for hearing on September 2, 2016. 

On August 10, 2016, plaintiff Modesta Jacinto filed opposition thereto. As 

defendants point out in their reply, however, plaintiff’s opposition is untimely, having been 

filed almost a full month after the filing date of defendants’ motion. See Civil L.R. 7-3(a) 

(providing “opposition must be filed and served not more than 14 days after the motion 

was filed”). 

Accordingly, the hearing on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is hereby VACATED 

and plaintiff is hereby Ordered to Show Cause, in writing and no later than September 7, 

 

1 On April 28, 2016, defendant National Default Servicing Corporation filed a 

Declaration of Non-Monetary Status, by which it agreed to be bound by any nonmonetary order or judgment, and, on May 26, 2016, pursuant to stipulation, defendant 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. was dismissed from the action.

Case 3:16-cv-02815-MMC Document 44 Filed 08/24/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

2016, why the opposition should not be stricken.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 24, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-02815-MMC Document 44 Filed 08/24/16 Page 2 of 2