Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06654/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06654-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6654

SIMON ALLEN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SPECIAL AGENT PAUL LEE, in his private and official 

capacity; SPECIAL AGENT EARL GILLIAM, in his private and 

official capacity; RAC SCOTT BAILEY, in his private and 

official capacity; ASST US ATTORNEY WILLIAM J. WATKINS, JR., 

in his private and official capacity; PROBATION OFFICER 

ROBERT F. WOODS, in his private and official capacity; US 

ATTORNEY WILLIAM N. NETTLES, in his private and official 

capacity; PUBLIC DEFENDER LORA C. BLANCHARD, in her private 

and official capacity; COURTROOM DEPUTY PAMELA BRISSEY, in 

her private and official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (8:15-cv-00504-RMG)

Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Simon Allen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Appeal: 15-6654 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/25/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-6654 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/25/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Simon Allen, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 

civil action against Defendants after a review, pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. §§ 1915, 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny 

Allen’s motion for a transcript at government expense and affirm 

the district court’s judgment. Allen v. Lee, No. 8:15-cv-00504-

RMG (D.S.C. Apr. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-6654 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/25/2015 Pg: 3 of 3