Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00879/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00879-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 DANNY V. BORQUEZ, ) 1:07-cv-00879 LJO GSA

)

) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

 vs. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, )

)

) 

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

On June 20, 2007, Plaintiff filed the present action in this Court. Plaintiff seeks review of the

Commissioner’s denial of his application for benefits. On June 20, 2007, Plaintiff also filed a

motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Thereafter, on June 22, 2007, this Court granted Plaintiff’s

motion to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered that the Clerk of this Court issue summons and the

United States marshal serve a copy of the complaint, summons and order upon the defendant “as

directed by the plaintiff.” (Document 3.) The order granting the motion included the following

attachments: (1) Instructions and Notice of Submission and (2) USM-285 Form. The instructions

directed Plaintiff to provide the clerk’s office with the original and five copies of the Summons, five

copies of the order directing service by the U.S. Marshal, five copies of the complaint, one

completed USM-285 form addressed to the Social Security Administration and five copies of any

other documents to be served. Plaintiff was served with the aforementioned order and attachments

Case 1:07-cv-00879-LJO-GSA Document 7 Filed 01/08/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

by mail on June 26, 2007. 

As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not submitted the required documents to the clerk’s

office for service by the United States Marshal on the defendant(s). Therefore, Plaintiff is ordered to

show cause, if any he has, why the action should not be dismissed for failure to submit the required

documents and to prosecute this action in a timely manner. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a written

response to this Order to Show Cause WITHIN twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. 

Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause within the time specified will result in

dismissal of this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 8, 2008 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

60kij8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00879-LJO-GSA Document 7 Filed 01/08/08 Page 2 of 2