Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03078/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03078-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA SERVICE EMPLOYEES

HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND,

et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ADVANCE BUILDING

MAINTENANCE,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-3078 CRB (BZ)

SECOND DISCOVERY ORDER

I held a telephonic conference on June 4, 2007, to

discuss the discovery dispute outlined in plaintiffs’ Motion

for Order Shortening Time (Docket No. 34) to hear a previously

filed Motion to Compel (Docket No. 24). We also discussed

defendant’s Motion for Protective Order (Docket No. 41) and

Motion For Order Shortening Time (Docket No. 43). All parties

were present and represented by counsel. For the reasons

articulated on the record, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 

1. The model stipulated protective order, which can be

found on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/

under the “Forms” link, is adopted and will govern discovery

Case 4:06-cv-03078-CW Document 46 Filed 06/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

in this case going forward;

2. The parties will electronically file a signed copy of

the stipulated protective order by 12:00 p.m. Wednesday, June

6, 2007; 

3. Defendant will produce, pursuant to the protective

order, all documents and information responsive to the

contested discovery requests by 5:00 p.m. Wednesday, June 6,

2007;

4. Because defendant stated during the telephonic

conference that its motion for a protective order is now moot

and that it will not seek further resolution thereof, the

Court considers that motion and the motion to shorten time to

have been withdrawn by defendant; 

5. Plaintiff’s motion to shorten time is GRANTED. 

Plaintiffs may file a supplement to their motion to compel by

Wednesday, June 13, 2007; Defendant’s opposition, if any, will

be filed by Wednesday, June 20, 2007; Plaintiffs’ reply will

be filed by Monday, June 25, 2007. The Court will notice a

hearing if necessary.

The parties are cautioned to comply carefully with the

requirements of the protective order, governing Ninth Circuit

law and Civil Local Rule 79 in designating information as

confidential and seeking to have it sealed. 

Dated: June 4, 2007

Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\CA.SERVICE EMPLOYEES\DISCOVERY.ORDER.wpd

Case 4:06-cv-03078-CW Document 46 Filed 06/04/07 Page 2 of 2