Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00135/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00135-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

*E-Filed 04/22/2010* 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CHRIS MONET, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, and DOES 

1 through 30, 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 10-00135 RS 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

In an order dated March 26, 2010, the Court ruled on defendant Chase Home Finance, LLC 

(“Chase”)’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint filed by plaintiff Chris Monet, pro se. 

The order denied the motion to dismiss with respect to Monet’s breach of contract and RESPA 

claims. As to Monet’s claims for unjust enrichment and injunctive relief, the motion to dismiss was 

granted, but Monet was afforded leave to amend. 

Monet has now filed his proposed second amended complaint and requests leave to amend. 

No further permission to amend is necessary, and Monet’s second amended complaint is hereby 

deemed timely filed as of April 21, 2010. 

The hearing on Monet’s motion for leave to amend, currently scheduled for June 3, 2010, is 

hereby vacated. The Case Management Conference scheduled for the same date is still on calendar, 

and the parties are reminded that separate joint case management statements are due no later than 

Case 5:10-cv-00135-LHK Document 18 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

May 28, 2010. Please refer to the standing order entitled “Contents of Joint Case Management 

Statement” for guidance in preparing the statement. A copy of the standing order may be found 

appended to the Court’s initial scheduling order in this case (docket entry 3). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 04/22/2010 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00135-LHK Document 18 Filed 04/22/10 Page 2 of 2