Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04063/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04063-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

A Registered Limited Liability 

Law Partnership Including 

Professional Corporations 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

TESSERA, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. ______________________________________

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. C 05-04063 CW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

TESSERA'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL RE 

(1) THIRD PARTY DOCUMENTS IN 

SPIL'S POSSESSION, AND 

(2) LOCATION OF 30(B)(6) 

DEPOSITIONS OF SPIL AND CHIPMOS 

Hearing Date: October 24, 2006 

Time: 3:30 p.m. (telephonic) 

Ctrm: E 

Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 231 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 4
 Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 266 Filed 11/09/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 1 - 

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

A Registered Limited Liability 

Law Partnership Including 

Professional Corporations 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TESSERA'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL

On October 24, 2006, the Court held a telephonic hearing regarding Plaintiff Tessera Inc.'s 

("Tessera") (1) Motion to Compel Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. ("SPIL") to Produce 

Third Party Documents, and (2) Motion to Compel the ChipMOS Defendants and SPIL to Produce 

30(b)(6) Witnesses in the Northern District of California. In accordance with the Court's 

statements during the hearing, and upon consideration of all the papers, filings and other materials 

submitted to the Court and the arguments of counsel, the Court resolves the pending motions as 

follows: 

1. Motion to Compel SPIL Third Party Documents. 

WHEREAS, during the hearing, counsel for third party Shin-Etsu appeared, and the Court 

was informed that Shin-Etsu had agreed to permit production of documents containing Shin-Etsu 

confidential information to Tessera on an interim "outside counsels' eyes only" basis, and that 

Shin-Etsu would promptly confer in good faith with Tessera as to an appropriate designation for 

the documents pursuant to the Protective Order; and 

WHEREAS, during the hearing, the Court was informed by counsel for SPIL that third 

party MGC had consented to production of documents containing MGC confidential information 

to Tessera, and that such documents would be produced promptly as soon as MGC informed SPIL 

as to the correct confidentiality designation for such documents pursuant to the Protective Order; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Tessera's motion to compel third party documents in 

SPIL's possession is taken off calendar. Should the documents in issue not be provided in 

accordance with the representations of SPIL and Shin-Etsu at the hearing, or should further issues 

regarding their production arise, Tessera may seek further Court intervention in accordance with 

Paragraph 8 of this Court's June 23, 2006 Order. 

2. Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Witnesses. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Tessera's Motion to Compel Production of 

30(b)(6) Witnesses in the Northern District of California is Granted in Part. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, in accordance with the Court's directives and 

SPIL's representations at the hearing, and the parties' subsequent agreements as to dates, SPIL 

Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 231 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 2 of 4
 Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 266 Filed 11/09/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

shall make its properly designated 30(b)(6) witness(es) regarding Tessera's First 30(b)(6) Notice 

available for deposition in the Northern District of California on November 9-10, 2006. Upon 

presentment of an invoice after completion of the travel, Tessera shall reimburse SPIL the cost of 

coach airfare for SPIL's witness(es), and the cost of reasonable hotel accommodations for the 

witness(es). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, in accordance with the Court's directives and 

ChipMOS's representations at the hearing, ChipMOS shall make its properly designated 30(b)(6) 

witness(es) regarding Tessera's First 30(b)(6) Notice available on November 9-10, 2006. In the 

event that ChipMOS designates foreign locations for its 30(b)(6) testimony, and upon presentment 

of an invoice after completion of the travel, ChipMOS shall reimburse Tessera for 50% of the 

reasonable costs of Tessera's travel, including hotel (Tessera anticipates lodging will be required 

for one attorney, one court reporter, one videographer, and one translator), coach airfare (Tessera 

anticipates that airfare will be required for one attorney, one court reporter, one videographer, and 

one translator), and conference room rental. Tessera agrees to use all reasonable efforts to employ 

a fully qualified, local translator and videographer, and, if no such local translator or videographer 

is available, Tessera agrees to use all reasonable efforts to employ the geographically closest fully 

qualified, translator and videographer – most likely based in Hong Kong – if practicable. 

ChipMOS shall also reimburse Tessera for four hours of attorney-billable travel time for the 

attorney taking the deposition. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________________ 

 Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

 Magistrate Judge, United States District Court 

Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 231 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 3 of 4
 Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 266 Filed 11/09/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 - 

Respectfully submitted by: 

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

 /s/ 

David Djavaherian 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

TESSERA, Inc. 

Concurring as to form

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

By /s/ 

HSIANG H. LIN (SBN 241472) 

JLIN@ORRICK.COM

Attorneys for Defendants SILICONWARE USA INC. 

and SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

By /s/ 

JOSEPH R. LANSER (PRO HAC VICE) 

JLANSER@SEYFARTH.COM

Attorneys for Defendants CHIPMOS U.S.A., INC. and 

CHIPMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures and/or written concurrences for 

any signature indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document. 

 /s/ 

 David Djavaherian 

Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 231 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 4 of 4
 Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 266 Filed 11/09/06 Page 4 of 4