Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00099/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00099-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR BINDING ARBITRATION 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michael K. Perkins, SBN 172560 

E-Mail: mperkins@employerlawyers.com 

FINE, BOGGS & PERKINS LLP 

80 Stone Pine Road, Suite 210 

Half Moon Bay, California 92614 

Telephone (650) 712-8908 

Facsimile (650) 712-1712 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LITHIA MOTORS, INC. AND 

LITHIA TOYOTA, LITHIA 

MOTORS SUPPORT SERVICES, 

LITHIA TOYOTA/SCION 

OF REDDING, COREY KERSTEN 

and GARY RUEBER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSEPH D. ATCHLEY IV,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

LITHIA MOTORS, INC. AND 

LITHIA TOYOTA, LITHIA MOTORS 

SUPPORT SERVICES, LITHIA 

TOYOTA/SCION OF REDDING, 

COREY KERSTEN, GARY RUEBER 

and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:15-cv-00099-JAM-CMK

ORDER GRANTING JOINT 

STIPULATION FOR BINDING 

ARBITRATION 

Case 2:15-cv-00099-JAM-CMK Document 8 Filed 03/31/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR BINDING ARBITRATION 

FPDOCS 30405577.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSEPH D. ATCHLEY IV,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

LITHIA MOTORS, INC. AND 

LITHIA TOYOTA, LITHIA MOTORS 

SUPPORT SERVICES, LITHIA 

TOYOTA/SCION OF REDDING, 

COREY KERSTEN, GARY RUEBER 

and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:15-cv-00099-JAM-CMK

ORDER GRANTING JOINT 

STIPULATION FOR BINDING 

ARBITRATION 

Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation for Binding Arbitration, and good cause 

having been shown, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

1. The parties’ disputes among each other shall be submitted to and 

resolved through binding arbitration according to the terms of the parties’ written 

arbitration agreements; 

2. The arbitration shall comply with the requirements of Armendariz v. 

Foundation Health Psychcare Servs., Inc. ((2000) 24 Cal. 4th 83), including the 

payment by the employer of arbitration fees and costs that are unique to the 

arbitration forum; and, 

3. The case in Federal Court shall be stayed pending the completion of 

all arbitration proceedings. 

Date: 3/30/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez_____________ ____________________________ 

 HON. JUDGE JOHN A. MENDEZ 

Case 2:15-cv-00099-JAM-CMK Document 8 Filed 03/31/15 Page 2 of 2