Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01481/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01481-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FERNANDO GASTELUM,

Plaintiff,

v.

LL SACRAMENTO LP,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:21-cv-1481-DJC-JDP

ORDER AFTER HEARING

This case was before the court on December 12, 2024, for hearing on defendant LL 

Sacramento LP’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 40, and plaintiff Fernando Gastelum’s

motion to withdraw and amend deemed admissions, ECF No. 44. Attorney Philip Stillman 

appeared on behalf of defendant; plaintiff appeared pro se.

For the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ motion to for summary judgment, ECF No. 40, is denied without 

prejudice as untimely.

2. Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw and amend deemed admissions, ECF No. 44, is granted. 

3. Plaintiff shall serve complete responses, without objection, to defendant’s request for 

admissions, interrogatories, and requests for production of documents by no later than January 9, 

2024. 

Case 2:21-cv-01481-DJC-JDP Document 48 Filed 12/13/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. The December 12, 2023 scheduling order is modified as follows:

a. the deadline for completion of discovery is continued to February 13, 2025, for 

the limited purpose of allowing plaintiff to provide responses to all outstanding discovery and 

resolve any disputes related to plaintiff’s forthcoming responses; and1

b. all dispositive motions shall be completed—that is, fully heard—by April 10, 

2025. The parties are reminded that a nonmoving party shall file with the court an opposition or 

statement of non-opposition to any properly noticed motion no later than fourteen days after the 

motion’s filing. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c). Any reply by the moving party shall be filed with the 

court no later than ten days after the opposition’s filing. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(d).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2024 

JEREMY D. PETERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 Should a dispute over the sufficiency of plaintiff’s responses arise, the parties should, 

after meeting and conferring, promptly contact the undersigned’s courtroom deputy to request a 

pre-discovery motion conference. 

Case 2:21-cv-01481-DJC-JDP Document 48 Filed 12/13/24 Page 2 of 2