Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05279/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05279-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO 

DISMISS AND STRIKE 

CASE NO. C07-5279 JSW 

405927.01 

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

ELLIOT R. PETERS - #158708 

DANIEL PURCELL - #191424 

KLAUS H. HAMM - #224905 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP and JACK L. SLOBODIN 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

RICHARD W. BERGER and BRANT W. 

BERGER, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP, an Illinois limited 

liability partnership; JACK L. SLOBODIN, an 

individual; BURNETT, BURNETT & 

ALLEN, a California partnership; DOUGLAS 

B. ALLEN, an individual; and DOES 1-100, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 

Case No. C07-05279 JSW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO 

DISMISS AND STRIKE 

Date: January 11, 2008 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom 2, 17th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White 

 

Date Comp. Filed: September 12, 2007 

Trial Date: None set. 

Case 3:07-cv-05279-JSW Document 32 Filed 11/09/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO 

DISMISS AND STRIKE 

CASE NO. C07-5279 JSW 

405927.01 

WHEREAS, pending before the Court are Defendants Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Jack 

Slobodin’s (collectively “Seyfarth”) motions to dismiss and strike and Defendant Douglas B. 

Allen d/b/a Burnett, Burnett & Allen’s motion to dismiss; and 

WHEREAS, the Court’s Order Setting Briefing Schedule, dated November 1, 2007, sets 

the filing deadline for oppositions to November 19, 2007 and it sets the deadline for filing replies 

to November 26, 2007; and 

WHEREAS, that November 1, 2007 Order also permits the parties to submit a proposed 

stipulation to the Court to change these filing dates for good cause; and 

WHEREAS, the Thanksgiving holiday falls during the time that defendants have for 

filing any replies; and 

WHEREAS, counsel for the plaintiffs will be out of the country until November 18, 

2007; and 

WHEREAS, counsel for the plaintiffs and defendants have now met and conferred and 

agreed upon the following briefing deadlines regarding defendants’ motions to dismiss and 

strike; 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS, SUBJECT TO THE 

COURT’S APPROVAL: 

1. Oppositions to the motions to dismiss and strike shall be filed no later than 

November 20, 2007; and 

2. Replies to the motions to dismiss and strike shall be filed no later than November 

29, 2007. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

// 

// 

// 

Case 3:07-cv-05279-JSW Document 32 Filed 11/09/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO 

DISMISS AND STRIKE 

CASE NO. C07-5279 JSW 

405927.01 

Dated: November 8, 2007 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ Klaus H. Hamm 

KLAUS H. HAMM 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP, and JACK L. 

SLOBODIN 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General 

Order No. 45, Section X.B. regarding 

signatures, Klaus H. Hamm hereby attests 

that concurrence in the filing of the 

document has been obtained.

 

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 The Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: November 8, 2007 BURNETT, BURNETT & ALLEN 

By: /s/ Douglas B. Allen 

Attorneys for Defendants 

DOUGLAS B. ALLEN and BURNETT, 

BURNETT & ALLEN 

Concurrence obtained per General Order 

45 X.B.

Dated: November 8, 2007 BECK, ROSS, BISMONTE & FINLEY, 

LLP 

By: /s/ Justin T. Beck 

JUSTIN T. BECK 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

RICHARD W. BERGER and BRANT W. 

BERGER 

Concurrence obtained per General Order 

45 X.B.

.

November 9, 2007

Case 3:07-cv-05279-JSW Document 32 Filed 11/09/07 Page 3 of 3