Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01185/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01185-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYSHON THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

PEREZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-CV-01185-AWI-DLB PC

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME IN PART

(DOCS. 45, 46, 47)

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE

WITHIN 30 DAYS

Plaintiff Rayson Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Pending before the Court are

Plaintiff’s motions for a ninety-day extension of time to file a third amended complaint, and for

filing of objections and other issues. Plaintiff filed these motions on February 24, 2010, March

1, 2010, and March 29, 2010.

Plaintiff complains of several issues, including lack of access to a laptop computer or a

copier, forcing Plaintiff to hand-write his complaints, and disagreements with the undersigned’s

screening of Plaintiff’s previous complaints. In its August 19, 2009 Order, the Court previously

found that Plaintiff’s second amended complaint contained several unrelated claims and struck

Plaintiff’s second amended complaint for non-compliance with the Federal Rules and the Court’s

orders. Plaintiff alleges that the Court never issued an August 19, 2009 Order. A review of the

docket indicates that the Court attempted to mail its Order to Plaintiff on several occasions, but

the mail was returned as undeliverable. The Court will send Plaintiff a copy of its August 19,

1

Case 1:07-cv-01185-AWI-DLB Document 49 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2009 Order. Plaintiff will be granted thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to

file his third amended complaint, in full compliance with the Court’s August 19, 2009 Order. No

extensions of time will be granted. Failure to comply will result in a recommendation of

dismissal of this action.

Accordingly the Court HEREBY ORDERS the following:

1) Plaintiff’s motions for extension of time are GRANTED in part;

2) The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of its August 19, 2009

Order, filed at Docket No. 35;

3) Plaintiff will file a third amended complaint in full compliance with the Court’s

August 19, 2009 Order within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this

order; and

4) Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of

this action for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 24, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

77e0d6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:07-cv-01185-AWI-DLB Document 49 Filed 08/24/10 Page 2 of 2