Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05104/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05104-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

ARONDO AUSTIN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

D.L. WINETT, et al., )

) 

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 04-5104 AWI DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS

TO RESPOND TO AMENDED

COMPLAINT

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM 285 FORMS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro per and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. 

Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed March 21, 2006. The

complaint appears to state a cognizable claim for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of

plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

WINETT

HUEBNER

SALISBURY

LUNDY

Case 1:04-cv-05104-DLB Document 51 Filed 02/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

LANGHAM

NELSON

GUERRO

MEYERS

2. Defendants Winett, Huebner, Salisbury and Langham have already been served with the

amended complaint. These defendants are therefore ordered to respond to the amended complaint

within 30 days of this order.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff three (3) additional USM-285 forms, three (3)

summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed March 21, 2006.

3. Within twenty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice

of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the court with the following

documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for defendants Nelson, Guerro and Meyers;

and 

c. Four (4) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed March 21, 2006. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. 

Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to

serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of

costs. 

5. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of

this action. Local Rule 11-110.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 9, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05104-DLB Document 51 Filed 02/12/07 Page 2 of 2