Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00198/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00198-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Netscape Communications Corporation, et

al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

Federal Insurance Company, et al.,

Defendants. /

NO. C 06-00198 JW 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

RE: SETTLEMENT BETWEEN

PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS

FEDERAL AND EXECUTIVE.

The parties have informed the Court that Plaintiffs Netscape Communications Corporation

and America Online, Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Federal Insurance Company

("Federal") and Executive Risk Speciality Insurance Company ("Executive") have reached a

settlement in the above-entitled matter. In light of the settlement, the Court vacates all trial and

pretrial dates as to Defendants Federal and Executive. On or before June 9, 2006, the parties shall

file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). 

If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, Plaintiffs, Federal, and Executive shall appear

in Courtroom No. 8, 4th Floor, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, Ca. on

June 26, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. and to show cause, if any, why the case between Plaintiffs, Federal, and

Executive should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). On or before June 9, 2006, the

Plaintiffs, Federal, and Executive shall file a joint statement in response to the Order to Show Cause. 

The joint statement shall set forth the status of the activities of Plaintiffs, Federal, and Executive for

finalizing the settlement and how much additional time is requested to finalize and file the dismissal. 

Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW Document 33 Filed 05/08/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

If a voluntary dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically

vacated.

Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss

this action against Federal and Executive.

Nothing in this Order shall pertain to the ongoing case between Plaintiffs and Defendant St.

Paul Mercury Insurance Company.

Dated: May 8, 2006

06cv198oscsettlFedExec

 /s/ James Ware 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW Document 33 Filed 05/08/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Daniel J. Bergeson dbergeson@be-law.com

Gordon I. Endow gendow@gordonrees.com

Jeffrey M. Ratinoff jratinoff@gordonrees.com

Leslie Ann Pereira lpereira@abelsonherron.com

Marc G. van Niekerk mvanniekerk@be-law.com

Michael Bruce Abelson mabelson@abelsonherron.com

Monique M. Fuentes courtir@rdblaw.com

Sara M. Thorpe sthorpe@gordonrees.com

Terrence R. McInnis courtir@rdblaw.com

Dated: May 8, 2006 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By:_/s/ JW Chambers________

Melissa Peralta

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW Document 33 Filed 05/08/06 Page 3 of 3