Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02372/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02372-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL GARCIA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2372 GEB EFB P

vs.

HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On July 28, 2006, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint, inter alia, for failure to state

a claim upon which relief could be granted, explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff

120 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that

failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed. On December 12, 2006, the court gave plaintiff an additional 60 day to file an

amended complaint and, once again, warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

The 60-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the order.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110. 

Case 2:05-cv-02372-GEB-EFB Document 30 Filed 03/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: March 1, 2007. 

Case 2:05-cv-02372-GEB-EFB Document 30 Filed 03/01/07 Page 2 of 2