Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00544/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00544-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAURO V. PEREZ,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0544 LKK DAD P

vs.

D.K. SISTO, et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed April 6, 2007, petitioner was ordered to pay the appropriate

filing fee, within twenty days, or his application would be dismissed. The twenty day period has

now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order, and has not paid the

appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

/////

Case 2:07-cv-00544-RSL -JLW Document 5 Filed 05/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 9, 2007.

DAD:lg

pere0544.fpf

Case 2:07-cv-00544-RSL -JLW Document 5 Filed 05/09/07 Page 2 of 2