Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01403/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01403-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE RODRIGUEZ, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

SUPERIOR COURT OF )

FRESNO COUNTY, )

)

)

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:07-cv-01403-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 3 )

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On September 25, 2007, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254 in this Court. (Doc. 1). 

On October 4, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED because

the federal court should abstain from deciding the issues raised in the petition under the doctrine

announced in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). (Doc. 3). This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed

timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

Case 1:07-cv-01403-LJO-TAG Document 5 Filed 11/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed October 4, 2007 (Doc. 3), is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 2, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01403-LJO-TAG Document 5 Filed 11/02/07 Page 2 of 2