Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00082/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00082-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN I. MCALLISTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

J.E. GUNJA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00082-OWW-SKO PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 15)

Plaintiff John I. McAllister (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 10, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations which

recommended that Plaintiff’s equal protection claims and due process claims be dismissed and that

Defendants Gunja, Booth, Gant, Jusino, Smith, and the U.S. Bureau of Prisons be dismissed from

this action. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice to

Plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days of date on which they were served. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.1

///

Defendants made an appearance in this action after the findings and recommendations issued. Defendants

1

have not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

1

Case 1:06-cv-00082-OWW -SMS Document 42 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 305, this Court

has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 

1. The February 10, 2009 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full;

2. Plaintiff’s equal protection claims and due process claims are DISMISSED; and

3. Defendants Gunja, Booth, Gant, Jusino, Smith, and the U.S. Bureau of Prisons are

DISMISSED from this action.IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 7, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:06-cv-00082-OWW -SMS Document 42 Filed 06/09/10 Page 2 of 2