Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00289/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00289-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY WIMBERLY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0289 DFL GGH P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed June 2, 2006, the court dismissed plaintiff’s claims against all

defendants but for defendants Sacramento County, Sacramento Sheriff’s Department and Lou

Blanas regarding a racially discriminatory housing policy, with thirty days to file an amended

complaint. On June 22, 2006, the plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the June 2, 2006,

order. On January 16, 2007, the Honorable David F. Levi, affirmed the June 2, 2006, order, and

granted plaintiff thirty days to file his amended complaint. The thirty day period has now

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s

order.

For the reasons given in the June 2, 2006, order, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that all claims contained in the complaint but for those against defendants

Sacramento County, Sacramento Sheriff’s Department and Lou Blanas regarding a racially

Case 2:06-cv-00289-JAM-GGH Document 15 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

discriminatory housing policy be dismissed. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

DATED: 3/21/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

wimb0289.fta

Case 2:06-cv-00289-JAM-GGH Document 15 Filed 03/22/07 Page 2 of 2