Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-05-06279/USCOURTS-ca4-05-06279-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 

---

Document 1

Document 2

Appeal: 05-6279 Doc: 20 Filed: 07/20/2005 Pg: 1 of 4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Lewis F. Powell, Jr. United States Courthouse Annex

1100 E. Main Street, Suite 501

Richmond, Virginia 23219-3517

Patricia S. Connor

Clerk

www.ca4.uscourts.gov Telephone

(804) 916-2700

 July 20, 2005

 Fred L. Borch III

 U. S. DISTRICT COURT

 P. O. Box 25670

 Raleigh, NC 27611

 Re: 05-6279 US v. Everette

 CR-01-68

 CA-04-358

 Dear Clerk:

 Enclosed is an opinion of this Court remanding the case for

 limited purpose. The record on appeal is being returned for the

 district court's use. Please return the record, as supplemented,

 to this Court after completing the determination on remand.

 Yours truly,

 PATRICIA S. CONNOR

 Clerk

 /s/ Margaret F. Thomas

 By: ________________________

 Deputy Clerk

 cc: Rudolf A. Renfer Jr.

 Calvin Lee Everette

Appeal: 05-6279 Doc: 20 Filed: 07/20/2005 Pg: 2 of 4
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6279

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CALVIN LEE EVERETTE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CR-01-68; CA-04-358)

Submitted: June 27, 2005 Decided: July 20, 2005

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Lee Everette, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

Appeal: 05-6279 Doc: 20 Filed: 07/20/2005 Pg: 3 of 4
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Lee Everette seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The

notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly after

expiration of the appeal period. Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and

Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), the notice is considered

filed as of the date Everette properly delivered it to prison

officials for mailing to the court. The record does not reveal if

or when Everette complied with the requirements of Fed. R. App. P.

4(c)(1). Accordingly, we remand the case for the district court to

obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether

the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v.

Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this

court for further consideration.

REMANDED

Appeal: 05-6279 Doc: 20 Filed: 07/20/2005 Pg: 4 of 4