Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-03767/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-03767-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

(Case No. CV 03-03767 RMW) 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. 

DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ. 

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL

925 West Hedding Street 

San José, California 95126 

T: 408-553-0200 

F: 408-553-0203 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ROBERT & LORI BELTRAN 

(by G.A.L.) COBY BELTRAN 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(San Jose Division) 

LORI BELTRAN, ROBERT BELTRAN, ) Case Number: CV 03-03767 RMW 

LORI BELTRAN as Guardian ad Litem ) 

For her minor child COBY BELTRAN ) Assigned Judge: Ronald M. Whyte 

 ) Dept. 6 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER 

vs. ) RE: COST ORDER 

 ) 

 ) 

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al. ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 )

 The parties hereto, by and through their respective counsel, do hereby agree and stipulate 

as follows, and request this court order same. 

1. The order of the court awarding costs of $7642 to defendants from plaintiffs, and made 

and filed 12/28/2005, is hereby stayed. 

2. At such time as plaintiff’s appeal on the Notice of Appeal filed 9/21/2005 to the 9th

Circuit Court of Appeals is decided or withdrawn, the plaintiffs shall have 30 days from the 

expiration of any appeal periods related thereto within which to file and serve any Motion to Tax 

Case 5:03-cv-03767-RMW Document 115 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND ORDER 

(Case No. CV 03-03767 RMW) 

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

Costs or other pleading disputing the amounts or validity of costs sought by defendants in this 

matter in their Bill of Costs filed 9/12/05. If plaintiffs fail to file and serve a Motion to Tax 

Costs or or other pleading disputing the amounts or validity of costs sought by defendants in this 

matter in their Bill of Costs filed 9/12/05, the Bill of Costs filed 9/12/05 is no longer stayed, and 

may be enforced by the County in any manner County deems necessary. 

3. This order does not in any manner prohibit plaintiffs or defendants from any efforts to 

seek initial costs, and/or further or additional costs, as such costs may be related to the plaintiffs 

appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: 2/1/06 ________________/S/___________________ 

 Melissa Kiniyalocts – Attorney for Defendants 

Dated: 2/1/06 _______________/S/____________________ 

 Robert R. Powell – Attorney for Plaintiffs 

ORDER 

 Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the 

court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties as an order of this court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 2/______/06 ___________________________________ 

 JUDGE RONALD M. WHYTE 

 U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

Case 5:03-cv-03767-RMW Document 115 Filed 03/01/06 Page 2 of 2