Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01330/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01330-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL (NO. C 05 1330 CW (EMC))

1

STEEFEL, LEVITT & WEISS

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER · 30TH FLOOR · SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3719

Telephone: 415/788-0900 · Facsimile: 415/788-2019

BRIAN T. HAFTER (State Bar No. 173151, bhafter@steefel.com)

STEEFEL, LEVITT & WEISS

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, 30th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-3719

Telephone: (415) 788-0900

Facsimile: (415) 788-2019

LAUREN REITER BRODY

(Pro Hac Vice, lbrody@torys.com)

CHRISTOPHER M. CAPARELLI

(Pro Hac Vice, ccaparelli@torys.com)

TORYS LLP

237 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10017

Telephone: (212) 880-6000

Facsimile: (212) 682-0200

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

DONALD H. PUTNAM, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

PUTNAM LOVELL GROUP NBF 

SECURITIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, and NATIONAL BANK OF 

CANADA, a Canadian chartered bank, 

NATIONAL BANK FINANCIAL, INC., a 

Quebec corporation; and DOES 1-20, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C 05 1330 CW (EMC)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

TO COMPEL

DATE: JULY 19, 2006

TIME: 3:00 P.M.

COURTROOM C, 15th FLOOR

THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN

WHEREAS, plaintiff filed and served a motion to compel defendants to produce 

documents and answer interrogatories;

WHEREAS, the Court scheduled a hearing on plaintiff’s motion for July 19, 2006;

Case 4:05-cv-01330-CW Document 91 Filed 06/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 4:05-cv-01330-CW Document 92 Filed 06/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL (NO. C 05 1330 CW (EMC))

2

STEEFEL, LEVITT & WEISS

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER · 30TH FLOOR · SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3719

Telephone: 415/788-0900 · Facsimile: 415/788-2019

WHEREAS, the parties have continued to meet and confer in an effort to resolve 

the issues raised by plaintiff’s motion;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to enlarge defendants’ time to file their 

opposition to plaintiff’s motion by two days and to enlarge plaintiff’s time to file his reply brief

by two days;

WHEREAS, taking into account that plaintiff’s time to prepare his reply brief 

substantially overlaps with the July 4 holiday weekend,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, as follows:

1. Defendants’ time to file their brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion to 

compel is enlarged by two (2) days to and including June 30, 2006;

2. Plaintiff’s time to file his reply brief in further support of plaintiff’s motion 

to compel is enlarged by two (2) days to and including July 7, 2006;

3. The hearing shall remain scheduled on July 19, 2006 at 3:00 p.m.

Dated: June 28, 2006 TORYS LLP

By: /s/ Lauren Reiter Brody

Lauren Reiter Brody

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: June 28, 2006 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

By: /s/ Christopher C. Kearney

Christopher C. Kearney

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

So Ordered:

Edward M. Chen

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:05-cv-01330-CW Document 91 Filed 06/28/2006 Page 2 of 2

by 12:00 p.m. by 12:00 p.m. (as modified on Lines 10 & 12)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 4:05-cv-01330-CW Document 92 Filed 06/29/06 Page 2 of 2