Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02353/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02353-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEALDASH OYJ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CONTEXTLOGIC INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 18-cv-02353-MMC 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 146

Before the Court is plaintiffs DealDash Oyj and DealDash Inc.’s (“DealDash”) 

“Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal Regarding DealDash’s Motion to 

Strike and Exclude Certain Opinions of Defendant’s Expert John Hansen,” filed May 10, 

2019, whereby DealDash seeks to file under seal material it has designated confidential, 

as well as material designated confidential by defendant ContextLogic, Inc. 

(“ContextLogic”). Having read and considered the administrative motion and the 

declarations filed in support thereof, the Court rules as follows:

1. To the extent DealDash seeks to file under seal Exhibits A, D, F, G, H, 199 and 

243 to the “Declaration of Patrick M. Shields in Support of DealDash’s Motion to Strike 

and Exclude Certain Opinions of Defendant’s Expert John Hansen” (“Shields 

Declaration”), the motion to seal is hereby GRANTED and said exhibit shall remain under 

seal. 

2. With respect to Exhibit B to the Shields Declaration, to the extent DealDash 

seeks leave to file the entirety of said exhibit under seal, the motion to seal is hereby 

DENIED, as the designating party, ContextLogic, only contends certain portions thereof

are confidential, and, to such extent, good cause having been shown, the motion to seal is 

Case 3:18-cv-02353-MMC Document 233 Filed 09/16/19 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

hereby GRANTED. As ContextLogic has filed in the public record a redacted version of 

Exhibit B in accordance therewith (see Doc. No. 167-4), no further action need be taken as to 

said exhibit and the unredacted version shall remain under seal.

3. With respect to Exhibit C to the Shields Declaration, to the extent DealDash 

seeks leave to file the entirety of said exhibit under seal, the motion to seal is hereby 

DENIED, as the designating party, ContextLogic, only contends certain portions thereof 

are confidential, and, to such extent, good cause having been shown, the motion to seal is 

hereby GRANTED. As ContextLogic has filed in the public record a redacted version of

Exhibit C in accordance therewith (see Doc. No. 167-6), no further action need be taken as to 

said exhibit and the unredacted version shall remain under seal.

4. With respect to Exhibit E to the Shields Declaration, to the extent DealDash 

seeks leave to file the entirety of said exhibit under seal, the motion to seal is hereby 

DENIED, as the designating party, ContextLogic, only contends certain portions thereof 

are confidential, and, to such extent, good cause having been shown, the motion to seal is 

hereby GRANTED. As ContextLogic has filed in the public record a redacted version of 

Exhibit C in accordance therewith (see Doc. No. 167-8), no further action need be taken as to 

said exhibit and the unredacted version shall remain under seal.

5. To the extent DealDash seeks to file under seal portions of its “Motion to Strike and 

Exclude Certain Opinions of Defendant’s Expert John Hansen,” the motion to seal is hereby 

GRANTED as to all portions other than the following, as to which the motion is DENIED, as 

said portions do not cite to any material that the designating party, ContextLogic, has 

contended is confidential:

a. Page 4:14 (beginning with “Mr.” and ending with “method”)

b. Page 4:16 (beginning with “Under”) - 17 

c. Page 7:14 - 16 

d. Page 7:23 (beginning with “Mr.”) - Page 8:2 (ending with “sales”)

e. Page 8:12 - 21

DealDash is hereby DIRECTED to file, within seven days of the date of this order, a version 

Case 3:18-cv-02353-MMC Document 233 Filed 09/16/19 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

of its “Motion to Strike and Exclude Certain Opinions of Defendant’s Expert John Hansen” 

consistent with the above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 16, 2019

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:18-cv-02353-MMC Document 233 Filed 09/16/19 Page 3 of 3