Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02177/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02177-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

Case No. Cv-03-2177-VRW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Counsel listed on last page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

3COM CORPORATION,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,

v.

D-LINK SYSTEMS INC.,

and

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR

CORPORATION

 

 Defendants/Counterplaintiffs.

Case No. Cv-03-2177-VRW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER AMENDING CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

The parties to the above-entitled action, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 3Com Corporation

(“3Com”) and Defendants/Counterplaintiffs Realtek Semiconductor Corporation (“Realtek”) and

D-Link Systems Inc. (“D-Link”), stipulate and agree, by and through their respective counsel, 

subject to the Court’s approval, as follows: 

1. The Scheduling Order of December 13, 2005 is amended with respect to claim 

construction briefing and the claim construction hearing as follows: 

• March 10, 2006 – 3Com files Opening Brief on Claim Construction pursuant to 

Pat. L.R. 4-5.

Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 331 Filed 03/10/06 Page 1 of 3
2

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

Case No. Cv-03-2177-VRW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

• March 24, 2006 – D-Link and Realtek file Responsive Brief(s) on Claim 

Construction pursuant to Pat. L.R. 4-5.

• March 31, 2006 – 3Com files its Reply Brief on Claim Construction pursuant to Pat. 

L.R. 4-5.

• April 14, 2006 – Claim Construction Hearing Pursuant to Pat. L.R. 4-6. 

2. The parties respectfully request that in light of the number of patents and terms in 

dispute, the page limits for claim construction briefs be changed from those set forth in the Court’s 

Standing Order 3.1 to no more than 35 pages per party for Opening and Responsive Briefs, and no 

more than 25 pages for 3Com’s Reply Brief. 

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: March 8, 2006 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

3330 Hillview Avenue

Palo Alto, CA 94304

Telephone: (650) 251-5000

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002

425 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10017

Telephone: (212) 455-2000

Facsimile: (212) 455-2502

By: /s/ Henry B. Gutman

Henry B. Gutman (admitted pro hac vice)

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

3Com Corporation

Dated: March 8, 2006 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP

1950 University Avenue, Suite 505

East Palo Alto, CA 94303

Telephone: (415) 795-9500

Facsimile: (415) 765-9502

By: /s/ Elizabeth H. Rader

Elizabeth H. Rader (CSB No. 184963)

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff

Realtek Semiconductor Corp.

Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 331 Filed 03/10/06 Page 2 of 3
3

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

Case No. Cv-03-2177-VRW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: March 7, 2006 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

Stanford Research Park

3300 Hillview Avenue

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203

Telephone: (650) 849-6600

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666

901 New York Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20001

Telephone: (202) 408-4000

Facsimile: (202) 408-4400

By: /s/ Steven H. Morrissett

Steven H. Morrissett (CSB No. 073424)

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff

D-Link Systems, Inc. (Case No. Cv-03-2177-

VRW)

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Elizabeth 

H. Rader, and Steven H. Morrissett.

Dated: March 8, 2006

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

By: /s/ Henry B. Gutman

Henry B. Gutman (admitted pro hac vice)

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

3Com Corporation

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________, 2006

__________________________________

Vaughn R. Walker

Chief United States District Judge

March 10

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANTED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 331 Filed 03/10/06 Page 3 of 3