Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01066/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01066-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MEDTRONIC VASCULAR INC.,

et al.

Plaintiffs, No. C 06-1066 PJH

v. ORDER RE UNOPPOSED 

MOTION TO FILE COMBINED

ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR REPLY BRIEF

SYSTEMS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

Before the court is plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for an order allowing plaintiffs to file

a combined reply brief to defendants’ counterclaim-plaintiffs’ answering claim construction

briefs and supporting evidence. Plaintiffs seek leave to filed a combined reply brief of no

more than thirty pages. 

Plaintiffs’ request is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, plaintiffs’

request to file a combined reply brief is granted, but insofar as plaintiffs seek to file a reply

brief that totals thirty pages in length, the request is denied. Plaintiffs may file a combined

reply brief of no more than twenty (20) pages in length. Alternatively, plaintiffs may file two

separate reply briefs, pursuant to the normal page limitations set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-

4(b). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 28, 2007 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-01066-PJH Document 206 Filed 09/28/07 Page 1 of 1