Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05612/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05612-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATHAN HALL, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

L.L. SCHULTEIS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05612-REC-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 33)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 29)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff Nathan Hall (“plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and

in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking

relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 16, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:04-cv-05612-REC-LJO Document 34 Filed 06/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 16, 2005,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss based on plaintiff’s

failure to exhaust the available administrative remedies, filed

February 2, 2005, is GRANTED; and,

3. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), this action is

DISMISSED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 28, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05612-REC-LJO Document 34 Filed 06/29/05 Page 2 of 2