Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05911/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05911-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

THEODORA R. LEE, Bar No. 129892

tlee@littler.com 

SCOTT D. HELSINGER, Bar No. 287178 

shelsinger@littler.com 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

650 California Street 

20th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94108.2693 

Telephone: 415.433.1940 

Facsimile: 415.399.8490 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF RICHMOND and DEANA NORTON 

DAVID M. POORE, Bar No. 192541 

dpoore@bplegalgroup.com 

SCOTT A. BROWN, Bar No. 177099 

sbrown@bplegalgroup.com 

BROWN POORE LLP 

1350 Treat Blvd., Suite 420 

Walnut Creek, CA 94597 

Telephone: 925.943.1166 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AUTUMN TURNAGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

AUTUMN TURNAGE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF RICHMOND; DEANA 

NORTON; and DOES 1 through 50, 

inclusive, 

Defendants.

Case No. 3:13-CV-05911 TEH 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

SETTING HEARING DATE ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 29] 

Complaint Filed: November 7, 2013 

First Amended Complaint filed: January 10, 

2014 

(Originally filed in Contra Costa County 

Superior Court, Case No. C13-02377) 

Judge: Thelton E. Henderson 

Dept.: Courtroom 12 - 19th Floor 

Case 3:13-cv-05911-TEH Document 36 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RESETTING MSJ HEARING

TURNAGE V CITY OF RICHMOND ET AL, CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05911 TEH 

Pursuant to the Court’s Order of January 27, 2015 vacating the hearing and ordering the 

parties to meet and confer as to acceptable hearing dates for Defendant’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment, or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Adjudication, the parties to this action, 

Plaintiff AUTUMN TURNAGE and Defendants CITY OF RICHMOND and DEANA 

NORTON, hereby STIPULATE to re-setting the hearing date to April 13, 2015. The Opposition 

and Reply due dates, as set by the Court’s January 27, 2015 Order, are March 9, 2015 and March 

16, 2015, respectively. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties that the Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment be re-set to April 13, 2015. 

SO STIPULATED. 

 

Dated: March 5, 2015 /s/ Scott D. Helsinger 

THEODORA R. LEE 

SCOTT D. HELSINGER 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF RICHMOND AND DEANA 

NORTON

Dated: March 5, 2015 

/s/ David M. Poore 

DAVID M. POORE 

SCOTT A. BROWN 

BROWN POORE LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AUTUMN TURNAGE 

Case 3:13-cv-05911-TEH Document 36 Filed 03/06/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RESETTING MSJ HEARING

TURNAGE V CITY OF RICHMOND ET AL, CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05911 TEH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, the Stipulation is APPROVED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 

29) is hereby re-set to the new hearing date of April 13 2015, at the same time and courtroom. 

 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March __, 2015 ___________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Firmwide:131494907.1 079526.1001 

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:13-cv-05911-TEH Document 36 Filed 03/06/15 Page 3 of 3