Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02000/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02000-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE BARAJAS,

Petitioner,

v.

TIM VIRGA,

Respondent.

No. 1:13-cv-02000-AWI-SKO HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF MOTION 

FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE

(Docs. 24, 29)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for 

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court referred the matter to the 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 304.

On August 4, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations in which 

she recommended that the Court deny Petitioner's motion for an order of stay and abeyance to 

permit exhaustion of unexhausted claims. The findings and recommendations, which were served 

on all parties the same day, provided that objections could be served within thirty days and replies 

within fourteen days after the filing of any objections. Neither party filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), having carefully reviewed 

the entire file de novo and considered Petitioner's objections, the Court finds that the findings and 

recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Case 1:13-cv-02000-DAD-SKO Document 30 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 4, 2015 (Doc. No. 29) are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s motion for an order of stay and abeyance (Doc. No. 24) is DENIED; and

3. The case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 11, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-02000-DAD-SKO Document 30 Filed 09/11/15 Page 2 of 2