Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00091/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00091-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VESTER LEE PATTERSON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0091 RRB EFB P

vs.

D.K. SISTO, et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed April 16, 2007, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis

application or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to

do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has

now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma

pauperis application or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

Case 2:07-cv-00091-JKS-EFB Document 5 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 27, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-00091-JKS-EFB Document 5 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 2