Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06018/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06018-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT SUDAR,

Plaintiff,

 v.

TOBIAS MILLER, SEAN KERR, PATRICK

TORRES, ERNST SCHWARZ, MARK

REISCHEL, EDWARD BERBERIAN,

THOMAS BROWN, YVETTE MARTINEZ,

LINDA M. WITONG, RANDOLPH

HEUBACK, JOHN SUTRO, VERNA

ADAMS, COUNTY OF MARIN, and DOES 1

through 100,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-06018 WHA

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS

TO DISMISS

All defendants filed motions to dismiss. Plaintiff never filed an opposition. Prior to the

hearing on defendants’ motions to dismiss, the Court issued the following notice on February 8,

2008 (Dkt. No. 21):

This is a notice to plaintiff Robert Sudar that his opposition was

originally due on January 24, 2008, in accordance with Civil Local

Rule 7-3. When plaintiff failed to file an opposition at that time,

the Court unilaterally extended his opposition deadline by another

week and continued the hearing date. Plaintiff’s new deadline to

submit an opposition was January 31, 2008. To date, plaintiff has

yet to provide an opposition. Plaintiff is now on notice that the

hearing will go forward on February 28, 2008. His failure to file

an opposition may well mean that defendants’ motions to dismiss

will be granted.

Case 3:07-cv-06018-WHA Document 28 Filed 02/28/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

At the February 28 hearing, Court waited an hour-and-a-half for plaintiff to appear, which he

never did. In light of plaintiff’s failure to provide any opposition to defendants’ motions — by

person or by paper — the motions to dismiss are hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 28, 2008. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-06018-WHA Document 28 Filed 02/28/08 Page 2 of 2