Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00680/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00680-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

PEARSON v. RGIS, INC

- 1 - Case No 3:06-cv-00680-VRW

MICHAEL M. HERRICK, Bar No. 63666 (herrick@wagelaw.com)

HERRICK LAW OFFICES

1750 Montgomery Street, # 1104

San Francisco, CA 94111-1063

Telephone: 415.781.2804

Facsimile: 415.781.8446

Attorney for Plaintiff

ERIC D. PEARSON

CHERYL D. ORR, Bar No. 143196 (corr@cdflaborlaw.com)

HEATHER M. SAGER, Bar No 186566 (hsager@cdflaborlaw.com)

CARLTON, DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER

260 California Street, Suite 500

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415.981.3233

Facsimile: 415.981.3246

Attorney for Defendants

RGIS INVENTORY SPECIALISTS, LLC (INCORRECTLY

SUED HEREIN AS RGIS, INC.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ERIC D. PEARSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

RGIS INVENTORY SPECIALISTS, LLC.

(INCORRECTLY SUED HEREIN AS

RGIS, INC.)

Does One through Ten,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:06-cv-00680-VRW

JOINT STIPULATION FOR THE FILING OF

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

THEREON

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure § 15(a)

/////

Case 3:06-cv-00680-VRW Document 14 Filed 07/11/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

PEARSON v. RGIS, INC

- 2 - Case No: 3:06-cv-00680-VRW

Plaintiff, ERIC D. PEARSON, and Defendant RGIS INVENTORY SPECIALISTS, LLC,

(collectively, “the Parties”) have agreed to stipulate that the Plaintiff’s “FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL” shall be filed in this case

without objection or need for a noticed motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Section

15(a). The complaint shall be amended to correctly identify Defendant RGIS INVENTORY

SPECIALIST LLC. incorrectly sued herein as RGIS, Inc.

Wherefore, the amendment to the complaint is that of form, Defendant shall not be required

to plead in response. The Parties agree that Defendant’s pleading in response to the Complaint shall

be deemed to apply to the First Amended Complaint.

Therefore, the Parties hereto, by their undersigned counsel of record and pursuant to Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure Section 15(a). hereby stipulate that the attached amended pleading shall be

filed by the written consent of the Defendant.

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 29, 2006 /S/ Heather M. Sager

HEATHER M. SAGER

CARLTON, DISANTE &

FREUDENBERGER

Attorney for Defendant

RGIS INVENTORY SPECALISTS, LLC,

Dated: June 29, 2006 /S/ Michael M. Herrick

MICHAEL M. HERRICK

HERRICK LAW OFFICES

Attorney for Plaintiff

ERIC D. PEARSON

Case 3:06-cv-00680-VRW Document 14 Filed 07/11/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

PEARSON v. RGIS, INC

- 3 - Case No: 3:06-cv-00680-VRW

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _____________________

_____________________________________________

THE HONORABLE VAUGHN R. WALKER

JUDGE OF THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

July 11, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:06-cv-00680-VRW Document 14 Filed 07/11/06 Page 3 of 3