Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04201/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04201-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JW\HC.07\Agrio04201_deny-coa.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PABLO J. AGRIO,

Petitioner,

 vs.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 07-04201 JW (PR)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE

OF APPEALABILITY

On August 19, 2009, the Court denied this pro se petition for writ of habeas

corpus, which challenged the denial of parole, on the merits and entered judgment in

favor of respondent. Petitioner filed a notice of appeal and the matter was forwarded

to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 

On May 6, 2010, the Ninth Circuit remanded this case for the limited purpose

of granting or denying a certificate of appealability. See Hayward v. Marshall, No.

06- 55392, 2010 WL 1664977, at *5 (9th Cir. Apr. 22, 2010) (en banc) (overruling

those portions of White v. Lambert, 370 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2004), and Rosas

v. Nielsen, 428 F.3d 1229, 1231-32 (9th Cir. 2005) (per curiam), that relieved a

prisoner from obtaining a certificate of appealability to review the denial of a habeas

petition challenging an administrative decision denying parole). 

Case 5:07-cv-04201-JW Document 25 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JW\HC.07\Agrio04201_deny-coa.wpd 2

“Where a district court has rejected the constitutional claims on the merits,

the showing required to satisfy § 2253(c) is straightforward: the petitioner must

demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the

constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000). The Court denied the instant habeas petition after careful consideration of

the merits. The Court found no violation of petitioner’s federal constitutional rights

in the administrative decision denying parole. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate

that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether this Court was correct in its

ruling. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The clerk shall forward this order to the Ninth Circuit from which petitioner

may also seek a certificate of appealability. See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d

1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997).

DATED: 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge 

May 10, 2010 

Case 5:07-cv-04201-JW Document 25 Filed 05/13/10 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PABLO AGRIO,

Petitioner,

 v.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. /

Case Number: CV07-04201 JW 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District

Court, Northern District of California.

That on , I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the

attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s)

hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into

an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Pablo J. Agrio E-17284

California Men’s Colony

PO Box 8101, #3350X

San Luis Obispo, CA 93409-8101

Dated: 

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk

5/13/2010 5/13/2010 /s/

Case 5:07-cv-04201-JW Document 25 Filed 05/13/10 Page 3 of 3