Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-04833/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-04833-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

1 As used herein, “Townshend” refers to both Brent Townshend and Townshend

Intellectual Property, LLC, and “Cisco” refers to Cisco Systems, Inc. The holding of this court is

limited to the facts and the particular circumstances underlying the present motion.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE TOWNSHEND PATENT

LITIGATION,

__________________________________

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

__________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 02-4833 JF (PVT)

And Consolidated Cases 

ORDER CONTINUING

TOWNSHEND’S MOTION TO

COMPEL INTERROGATORY

ANSWERS AND DOCUMENT

PRODUCTION BY CISCO

On April 29, 2005 Townshend filed its Motion to Compel Interrogatory Answers and

Document Production by Cisco.1 From the briefs it appears Cisco has supplemented its

interrogatory responses and document production, but Townshend did not have sufficient time to

review the supplemental discovery before filing its reply. Therefore, the court finds it

appropriate to issue this interim order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Townshend’s Motion to Compel

Interrogatory Answers and Document Production by Cisco is continued to June 21, 2005.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than June 14, 2005, Townshend shall file a

supplemental reply brief stating what discovery it believes still needs to be compelled in light of

Cisco’s supplementation.

Dated: 6/3/05

 /s/ Patricia V. Trumbull 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:02-cv-04833-JF Document 433 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 1