Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_19-cv-01121/USCOURTS-casd-3_19-cv-01121-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1346 U.S. Defendant

---

– 1 –

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENDRICK BANGS KELLOGG,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 19-cv-1121-BAS-JLB

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v.

JULIE WILSON, et al.,

Defendant.

Plaintiff Kendrick Bangs Kellogg is a litigant familiar to this Court. In June 

of this year, the Court issued an order detailing all of Plaintiff’s prior cases. (18-

cv1758-BAS-JLB, ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff’s five prior cases had all been dismissed. 

The Court analyzed Plaintiff’s most recent complaint and determined “the pleading 

is substantively identical to the numerous prior complaints rejected by the Court.” 

(Id. at 5.) “The Court has repeatedly warned Kellogg that he cannot evade this 

Court’s dismissal orders by simply filing a new lawsuit that raises the same 

allegations. Nevertheless, Kellogg has again violated the Court’s orders by filing yet 

another action that seeks the same relief.” (Id.) Because Plaintiff had violated the 

Court’s orders, the Court dismissed the case with prejudice. (Id.)

Yet again, despite this warning, Plaintiff filed another suit. In fact, the 

Case 3:19-cv-01121-BAS-JLB Document 12 Filed 10/24/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
– 2 –

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

complaint in the present case is identical to the one in Plaintiff’s prior case. 

(Compare ECF No. 1 to 18-cv1758-BAS-JLB, ECF No. 1.) Again, Plaintiff has 

violated the Court’s orders stating that Plaintiff may not simply file “a new lawsuit 

that raises the same allegations” as he did in his prior, dismissed cases. For the same 

reasons as detailed in the Court’s prior order, (18-cv1758-BAS-JLB, ECF No. 29), 

the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint.

Plaintiff is warned that should he again violate the Court’s orders and file a 

new lawsuit that raises the same allegations as he did in his prior, dismisses cases, 

the Court may declare Plaintiff to be a vexatious litigant.

The Clerk is instructed to close the case. The Clerk is also to provide Plaintiff 

with a copy of the Court’s prior order, 18-cv1758-BAS-JLB, ECF No. 29, to remind 

Plaintiff of the Court’s rulings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 24, 2019

Case 3:19-cv-01121-BAS-JLB Document 12 Filed 10/24/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2