Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-mc-80172/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-mc-80172-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1

Case No.: 5:15-mc-80192-EJD

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRUCE IVES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:15-mc-80192-EJD 

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE 

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young (“Plaintiff”) has been declared a vexatious litigant. See

Docket Item No. 40, Case No. 3:13-cv-04442-EMC. He is also subject to a pre-filing order which 

specifically requires him to “obtain leave of court before filing any further suits alleging any 

violations of the federal criminal statutes, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b), 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c), 

and 18 U.S.C. § 371, and the FTCA, codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq.” Id. Plaintiff presently

seeks leave to file a Complaint against Bruce Ives and F. Joseph Warin for alleged violations of 

two statutes covered by the pre-filing order - § 1512(b) and § 1512(c). This is the seventh time he 

has presented this same Complaint, having been denied leave to file it on six previous occasions. 

See Case Nos. 5:14-mc-80332-BLF; 5:15-mc-80335-BLF; 3:14-mc-80343-WHA; 5:15-mc80031-YGR; 5:15-mc-80151-EJD; 5:15-mc-80172-EJD. Once again, the court reviews the 

pleading to “determine whether Plaintiff has stated a potentially cognizable claim in a short, 

intelligible and plain statement.” See Docket Item No. 40, Case No. 3:13-cv-04442-EMC.

As was explained most recently on June 23, 2015, the criminal statutes referenced by 

Plaintiff do not provide for a private cause of action. Accordingly, the instant claims are barred by 

the pre-filing order because is no legal basis to support them. Leave to file the Complaint is 

Case 5:15-mc-80172-EJD Document 3 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:15-mc-80192-EJD

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 2, 2015

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-mc-80172-EJD Document 3 Filed 07/02/15 Page 2 of 2