Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03304/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03304-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADRIENNE MACBETH,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

et al.,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 07-3304 MEJ

ORDER REQUESTING

CLARIFICATION RE THIRD CAUSE OF

ACTION

On August 31, 2007, Plaintiff filed an Opposition to Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss. 

In her opposition, Plaintiff states that she does not oppose Defendants' motion as it relates to the

Third through Ninth causes of action, given her failure to comply with procedural requirements

related to those claims. As Plaintiff's third cause of action is brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and

Plaintiff's statement of non-opposition refers to her state law claims, the Court requests clarification

regarding her non-opposition to dismissal of the third cause of action. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall

file a statement of clarification by September 21, 2007. Plaintiff shall make no further legal

argument in her statement; rather, Plaintiff shall simply state whether her statement of nonopposition is correct as to the third cause of action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 17, 2007 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cv-03304-MEJ Document 16 Filed 09/17/07 Page 1 of 1