Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01216/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01216-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES L. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

RAMEN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01216-AWI-SKO PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

(Doc. #47 & #74)

Plaintiff James L. Davis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 4, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations which

recommended that Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. The Findings and

Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to

the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date on which the

Findings and Recommendations were served. Neither Plaintiff nor Defendants have filed objections

to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 305, this Court

has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

1

Case 1:06-cv-01216-AWI -SMS Document 77 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 

1. The May 4, 2010 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 22, 2010 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2

Case 1:06-cv-01216-AWI -SMS Document 77 Filed 06/22/10 Page 2 of 2