Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01809/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01809-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANNY ATTERBURY,

Petitioner, 2:03-cv-1809-GEB-DAD-P

vs.

DAVE GRAZINI, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

On April 21, 2005, petitioner filed a request for

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed April 15,

2005, granting respondents an extension of time to file their

response to petitioner’s third amended petition. On April 26,

2005, petitioner filed a request for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order filed on April 21, 2005 denying

petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel. Pursuant to

Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of

the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

Case 2:03-cv-01809-GEB-DAD Document 100 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

magistrate judge’s rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary to

law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon

reconsideration, the orders of the magistrate judge filed on

April 15, 2005 and April 21, 2005, are affirmed. 

Dated: September 16, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01809-GEB-DAD Document 100 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 2