Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03531/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03531-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAPU GEMS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-03531-MMC 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 107

Before the Court is plaintiffs Kapu Gems and Kapu Gems, Ltd.’s “Motion for 

Summary Judgment,” filed November 4, 2016. Defendants Diamond Imports, Inc. and 

Yair Yachdav have filed opposition, to which plaintiffs have replied. The matter came on 

regularly for hearing on January 13, 2017. Anthony Paduano of Paduano & Weintraub 

LLP appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. Ronald D. Foreman of Foreman & Brasso appeared 

on behalf of defendants.

For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, in particular, the underlying 

factual dispute as to the nature of the contractual relationship between the parties and 

the absence in the record of facts from which an undisputed amount owed otherwise can 

be calculated, the motion is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2017

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-03531-MMC Document 129 Filed 01/13/17 Page 1 of 1