Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05429/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05429-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND 

PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 

[PROPOSED ORDER] 

CASE NO. C-04-5429-CW (EMC) 

MPK 98845-1.073241.0011

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

1530 PAGE MILL ROAD 

PALO ALTO, CA 94304 

TELEPHONE: (650) 251-1114 FAX: (650) 856-3710

DAVID B. MOYER, BAR NO. 197739 

dmoyer@foley.com 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

3000 K ST., N.W. 

WASHINGTON, DC 20007 

TELEPHONE: 202.672.5300 

FACSIMILE: 202.672.5399 

LARRY L. SHATZER, PRO HAC VICE

lshatzer@foley.com 

GEORGE C. BEST, PRO HAC VICE

gbest@foley.com 

LIANE M. PETERSON, PRO HAC VICE

lpeterson@foley.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, INSMED

INCORPORATED AND CELTRIX

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

GENENTECH, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

TERCICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

INSMED INCORPORATED, a Virginia 

Corporation, and CELTRIX 

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation.

 Defendants. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C-04-5429-CW (EMC) 

STIPULATION GRANTING 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

AMEND PRELIMINARY 

INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Date: November 2, 2005 

Time: 3:00 p.m. 

Location: Courtroom C 

 15th Floor 

The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Genentech, Inc. and Tercica, Inc. filed on September 19, 2005 a 

Motion for Leave to Amend Preliminary Infringement Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 

3-7.

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 209 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND 

PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 

[PROPOSED ORDER] 

CASE NO. C-04-5429-CW (EMC) 

 WHEREAS, upon receipt of the motion Defendants requested that Plaintiffs provide a 

copy of their proposed amendments and Plaintiffs did so; 

 WHEREAS, a copy of Plaintiffs’ Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and 

Preliminary Infringement Contentions (Patent L.R. 3-1) is attached hereto; 

 WHEREAS, Defendants do not object to the amendments to Plaintiffs’ Preliminary 

Infringement Contentions disclosed in the attached, but reserve the right to amend their invalidity 

contentions pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3 as appropriate in light of these amendments; 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, through their 

respective counsel, that

 (1) As good cause exists pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-7, Plaintiffs are granted 

leave to amend their Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions to 

the extent set forth in the attached document. 

 (2) Good cause exists pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-7 for Defendants to amend 

their Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to state their invalidity contentions only for and limited 

to Plaintiffs’ newly asserted infringement contentions for claims 6, 9 and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 

5,258,287. Defendants shall serve any such amendment within thirty (30) days of the date of this 

Order.

 (3) The briefing schedule and November 2, 2005, hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Leave to Amend are vacated. 

Dated: October 11, 2005 McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

 By:__________/s/_________________ WILLIAM G. GAEDE III 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 TERCICA, INC. 

Dated: October 11, 2005 HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP 

 By:__________/s/___________________ M. PATRICIA THAYER 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 GENENTECH, INC. 

Dated: October 11, 2005 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

 By:_________/s/_____________________ DAVID B. MOYER 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 INSMED, INC. AND CELTRIX 

 PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 209 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND 

PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 

[PROPOSED ORDER] 

CASE NO. C-04-5429-CW (EMC) 

 Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from William G. Gaede III 

and M. Patricia Thayer, the signatories listed above. 

Dated: October 11, 2005 By:_________/s/_____________________

 DAVID B. MOYER 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 INSMED, INC. AND CELTRIX 

 PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: ____________________ ___________________________ 

 Hon. Edward M. Chen 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

October 12, 2005

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 209 Filed 10/12/05 Page 3 of 3