Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00129/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00129-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MILES O. BONTY,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. INDERMILL, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. CV-F-06-0129 OWW DLB P

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 29, 2006, the undersigned recommended that this

action be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to exhaust all available administrative remedies

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). The District Court adopted this recommendation on December

4, 2006. On July 12, 2007, the District Court granted plaintiff’s motion to reconsider the order

adopting based on a change in controlling authority. See Jones v. Bock, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 910

(2007) [inmate’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies as to some but not all claims does not

warrant dismissal]. The District Court noted that plaintiff’s claims are not limited to the issues

raised in his administrative appeal.

Based on the District Court’s July 10, 2007 Order, plaintiff is ordered to file an amended

complaint within 30 days, including only those claims that have been fully exhausted. The Court

will then proceed to screen the amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 1:06-cv-00129-OWW -DLB Document 22 Filed 07/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Dated: July 19, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0h UNITED STA j8 TES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00129-OWW -DLB Document 22 Filed 07/19/07 Page 2 of 2