Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00853/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00853-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDILBRANDO BANDULA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

MARK WIMBISH, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-00853-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 9)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 4)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On August 1, 2006, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the petition be GRANTED

and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for RIPENESS. (Doc. 9). The Report

and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. On August 14, 2006, Petitioner filed

objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 12). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:06-cv-00853-OWW -TAG Document 13 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation issued August 1, 2006 (Doc. 9), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 4), is DISMISSED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 23, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00853-OWW -TAG Document 13 Filed 09/26/06 Page 2 of 2