Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00898/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00898-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IVAN HOPKINS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,

JAMES TILTON, AGENT PAYNE, and

DOES 1–100,

Defendants. /

No. C 08-00898 WHA

ORDER RE HEARING SET FOR

JULY 17, 2008

Per the initial case management conference on June 19, 2008, defendants’ motion to

dismiss has been reset to July 17, 2008. Even though his motion for appointment of counsel

was denied, plaintiff Ivan Hopkins is reminded that he must still comply with the Civil Local

Rules. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition to the motion must be served and

filed on June 26, 2008. The briefs and memoranda may not exceed 25 pages of text. 

Defendants’ reply is due on July 3, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2008. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-00898-WHA Document 26 Filed 06/20/08 Page 1 of 1