Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01210/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01210-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re SiRF TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.

SECURITIES LITIGATION

___________________________________

This Document Relates To: Cases Nos.

C-08-905 (Nussbaum), C-08-1013 (Majur),

C-08-1104 (Fielden), C-08-1121 (Mitchell

Schorr Rev. Trust), C-08-1122 (Furman),

C-08-1210 (Hunter)

 /

Master File No. C 08-0856 MMC

ORDER CLOSING CONSOLIDATED

CASES FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES

ONLY

The following seven cases have been consolidated, with the consolidated action

being titled In re SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation, C-08-0856 MMC:

Esses v. SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., C-08-0856 MMC

Nussbaum v. SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., C-08-0905 MMC

Majur v. SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., C-08-1013 MMC

Fielden v. SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., C-08-1104 MMC

Mitchell Schorr Rev. Trust v. SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., C-08-1121 MMC

Furman v. SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., C-08-1122 MMC

Hunter v. SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., C-08-1210 MMC

In light of the consolidation, the file in Civil Action No. C-08-0856 has been

designated as the Master File, and all documents are being filed in the Master File. 

Consequently, there appears to be no reason at this time to maintain the remainder of the

cases as open files for statistical purposes. Accordingly, the above-referenced cases, with

the exception of the Master File, No. C-08-0856, are hereby CLOSED for statistical

purposes only.

Case 3:08-cv-01210-MMC Document 5 Filed 03/20/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of any

action, and, should further proceedings therein become necessary or desirable, any party

may initiate them in the same manner as if this order had not been entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 20, 2008 MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-01210-MMC Document 5 Filed 03/20/08 Page 2 of 2