Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01555/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01555-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 362
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice

---

1 

UNITED STATES’ NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING 

ON MOTION TO DISMISS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Defendant. 

 CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-1555-TLN-EFB PS 

UNITED STATES’ NOTICE OF 

RESCHEDULED HEARING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) 

NEW HEARING DATE: 

Date: November 5, 2014 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Judge: Hon. Edmund F. Brennan 

Ctrm.: 8, 13th floor 

Old Hearing Date: 

Date: October 1, 2014 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, at Pro Se Plaintiff Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel’s request, the 

United States hereby reschedules the hearing on its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter 

Jurisdiction (Dkt. 10) to November 5, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as this matter may 

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney 

VICTORIA L. BOESCH 

Assistant United States Attorney 

501 I Street, Suite 10-100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2743 

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for the United States 

Case 2:14-cv-01555-TLN-EFB Document 12 Filed 08/29/14 Page 1 of 2
2 

UNITED STATES’ NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING 

ON MOTION TO DISMISS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

be heard, in the Courtroom of the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan, United States Magistrate Judge, 

United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, Courtroom No. 8, 13th Floor. The 

United States brings this motion because, in order to bring a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act 

(the “FTCA”), Plaintiff must first exhaust his administrative remedies. Because he has not done so, 

the Court lacks jurisdiction and Plaintiff’s case must be dismissed. 

On August 26, 2014, the United States’ counsel received a request from Plaintiff for 30 more 

days to respond to its motion to dismiss. That request suggests that Plaintiff had a stroke and needs 

extra time to respond. See Exhibit A. The United States therefore re-notices its motion to give 

Plaintiff the requested extra time. 

Because Plaintiff proceeds pro se, the United States refers him to Eastern District of 

California Local Rule 230, which provides: 

Opposition and Non-Opposition. Opposition, if any, to the granting of 

the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less 

than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed (or continued) hearing 

date. A responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the 

motion shall serve and file a statement to that effect, specifically 

designating the motion in question. No party will be entitled to be 

heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if opposition to the 

motion has not been timely filed by that party. See [Local Rule] 135. 

E.D. Cal. R. 230(c). 

Respectfully submitted, 

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

United States Attorney 

Dated: August 27, 2014 By: /s/ Victoria L. Boesch 

VICTORIA L. BOESCH 

Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorneys for the United States 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 28, 2014. 

Case 2:14-cv-01555-TLN-EFB Document 12 Filed 08/29/14 Page 2 of 2