Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00112/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00112-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORENZO D. CRAMER,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. ESTRADA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:19-cv-00112-DAD-JLT (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE 

TO PAY THE REQUIRED FILING FEE AND 

OBEY A COURT ORDER

(Doc. No. 6)

Plaintiff Lorenzo D. Cramer is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 24, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 

recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to comply 

with the court’s July 1, 2019 order which required plaintiff to either pay the required filing fee to 

proceed with this action or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 6; see also

Doc. No. 5.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice 

that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Doc. No. 6 at 

/////

Case 1:19-cv-00112-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 03/10/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1–2.) The deadline to file objections has passed, and plaintiff has failed to file objections or 

otherwise communicate with the court regarding this action.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly:

1. The September 24, 2019 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 6) are adopted 

in full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to pay the 

required filing fee and failure to obey a court order; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2020 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-00112-DAD-JLT Document 8 Filed 03/10/20 Page 2 of 2