Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00628/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00628-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERNEST R. GRANDBERRY, No. 2:06-cv-0628-MCE-GGH-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

R. CASTRO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

On August 3, 2006, Plaintiff filed objections to the order

filed July 25, 2006, granting Respondent’s Request for Extension

of Time. The Court construes Plaintiff’s objections as a request

for reconsideration.

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s

orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to

law.” Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it

does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.

///

Case 2:06-cv-00628-MCE -GGH Document 19 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration,

the order of the magistrate judge filed July 25, 2006, is

affirmed. 

DATED: August 14, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00628-MCE -GGH Document 19 Filed 08/15/06 Page 2 of 2