Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-02790/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-02790-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 1 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

Jonathan Weissglass (SBN 185008)

jweissglass@altshulerberzon.com

ALTSHULER BERZON LLP

177 Post Street, Suite 300

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (310) 392-8801

Facsimile: (310) 278-5938

J. Gerard Stranch, IV (admitted pro hac vice)

gerards@bsjfirm.com

Benjamin A. Gastel (admitted pro hac vice)

beng@bsjfirm.com

BRANSTETTER, STRANCH & JENNINGS, 

PLLC

223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200

Nashville, TN 37203

Telephone: (615) 254-8801

Facsimile: (615) 255-5419

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Crystal Kao and Nina Barwick, individually and on 

behalf of herself and all others similarly situated

Mark McKane (SBN 230552)

Mark.mckane@kirkland.com

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

555 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 439-1400

Facsimile: (415) 439-1500

Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice)

gregg.locascio@kirkland.com

Anders Fjellstedt (admitted pro hac vice)

anders.fjellstedt@kirkland.com

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004

Telephone: (202) 389-5000

Facsimile: (202) 389-5200

Attorneys for Defendant 

Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CRYSTAL KAO and NINA BARWICK, 

individually and on behalf of themselves and all 

other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. an Illinois 

corporation d/b/a Abbott Nutrition,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER 

RE DISCOVERY OF 

ELECTRONICALLY STORED 

INFORMATION

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 1 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 2 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

1. PURPOSE

This Order will govern discovery of electronically stored information (“ESI”) in this case as a 

supplement to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court’s Guidelines for the Discovery of 

Electronically Stored Information, and any other applicable orders and rules.

2. COOPERATION

The parties are aware of the importance the Court places on cooperation and commit to 

cooperate in good faith throughout the matter consistent with this Court’s Guidelines for the Discovery 

of ESI.

3. LIAISON

The parties have identified liaisons to each other who are and will be knowledgeable about and 

responsible for discussing their respective ESI. Each e-discovery liaison will be, or have access to 

those who are, knowledgeable about the technical aspects of e-discovery, including the location, 

nature, accessibility, format, collection, search methodologies, and production of ESI in this matter. 

The parties will rely on the liaisons, as needed, to confer about ESI and to help resolve disputes without 

court intervention.

4. PRESERVATION

The parties have discussed their preservation obligations and needs and agree that preservation 

of potentially relevant ESI will be reasonable and proportionate. To reduce the costs and burdens of 

preservation and to ensure proper ESI is preserved, the parties agree that:

a) Only ESI in the form of email, employee hard drives, employee home shares, 

Departmental Network Shares, SharePoint, and relevant document management systems created or 

received between January 15, 2015 and May 15, 2017 will be preserved;

b) The parties will agree on the number of custodians per party for whom ESI will be 

preserved;

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 2 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 3 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

c) These data sources are not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(B) and ESI from these sources will be preserved but not searched, 

reviewed, or produced: disaster recovery backup media and backup of employee computers;

d) Among the sources of data the parties agree are not reasonably accessible, the parties 

agree not to preserve the following: backup media created before January 15, 2015, digital voicemail, 

instant messaging, and text messages;

e) In addition to the agreements above, the parties agree data from these sources (a) could 

contain relevant information but (b) under the proportionality factors, should not be preserved: digital 

voicemail, instant messaging, and text messages.

5. SEARCH

The parties agree that in responding to an initial Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 request, or earlier if 

appropriate, they will meet and confer about methods to search ESI in order to identify ESI that is 

subject to production in discovery and filter out ESI that is not subject to discovery.

6. PRODUCTION FORMATS

The parties agree to produce documents in [ ] PDF, [x]TIFF, [x]native and/or [ ]paper or 

a combination thereof file formats. If particular documents warrant a different format, the parties will 

cooperate to arrange for the mutually acceptable production of such documents. The parties agree not 

to degrade the searchability of documents as part of the document production process. The parties 

additionally agree to the following production format and process:

A. Form of Production. The parties will produce all documents as Group IV single page 

black and white TIFF format files imaged at 300 dpi, except that product labels and print 

advertisements which exist in color shall be produced in color. For all other documents (which will 

be produced in black and white) the producing party will honor reasonable requests made in good faith 

for either the production of the original document for inspection and copying or production of a color 

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 3 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 4 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

image of the document. The parties will name each TIFF file with a unique name matching the Bates 

number labeled on the corresponding page, and will include appropriate confidentiality designations 

labeled on the document as specified in the Protective Order. The Bates number should be consistent 

across the production, contain no special characters, and be numerically sequential within a given 

document.

1. When processing ESI for review and for production in TIFF format, the producing 

party will instruct its vendor to force off Auto Date and unhide all hidden objects.

2. When processing ESI, CST should be selected as the time zone and the producing 

party will note the time zone used in its processing. To the extent that a party has already processed 

ESI using a different time zone, the producing party will note the time zone used in its processing. 

Otherwise, Parties shall consistently produce all ESI processed using the same time zone. When a 

metadata field includes a date, the date shall be provided in the format defined in Section 6.K. below.

3. The parties shall meet and confer to the extent reasonably necessary to facilitate the 

import and use of the produced materials with commercially available document management or 

litigation support software.

B. Image Load File. The parties shall provide an image load file (e.g., Opticon file or LFP) 

that contains document boundaries.

C. Document Text. For documents containing extractable text that was originally stored as 

native electronic files and which do not have redactions, the extracted, full text from the body of each 

document will be produced in a separate .txt file named for the beginning Bates number of the 

document. For documents that were originally stored as native electronic files and which have 

redactions, OCR text will be produced from the redacted image(s) associated with each document as 

a separate .txt file for each document named for the Bates number of the document. Any redacted, 

privileged material should be clearly labeled to show the redactions on the TIFF image.

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 4 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 5 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

D. Excel and Other Spreadsheet Files. Files created by Microsoft Excel or other spreadsheet 

programs shall be produced in native format with corresponding TIFF images of Bates-stamped slipsheets and appropriate confidentiality labeling. The parties will provide a relative file path or link to 

the native Excel in the .dat file. The produced file shall be named with the Bates number of the first 

page of the corresponding TIFF production of the document (e.g., “ABC00001.xls”).

E. Special File Types. If production in native format is necessary to decipher the meaning, 

context, or content of a document produced in TIFF, the producing party will honor reasonable 

requests made in good faith for either the production of the original document for inspection and 

copying or production of the document in native format. Documents that are to be produced in a native 

format, but that require redactions will be produced as TIFF images with the relevant portions 

redacted, or if a TIFF image production is not practicable (e.g., the file is a video or very large 

spreadsheet), as a copy of the native file with the relevant portions replaced with “[REDACTED]” or 

a similar mark. The produced file should be named with the Bates number of the first page of the 

corresponding TIFF production of the document (e.g., “ABC00001.ppt”).

F. Production of Physical Documents. Documents that exist in physical hard-copy format 

shall be scanned and produced electronically. These documents shall be converted to single page 

image files (BLACK AND WHITE Group IV TIFF) and produced following the same protocols set 

forth herein or otherwise agreed to by the parties. All such documents will be produced with an OCR 

file as outlined in Section 6.H. below.

G. Document Unitization. For files produced as either BLACK AND WHITE Group IV 

TIFF, each page of a document shall be electronically saved as an image file. If a document consists 

of more than one page, the unitization of the document and any attachments and/or affixed notes shall 

be maintained as it existed in the original when creating the image files.

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 5 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 6 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

H. Load/Unitization File. The producing party shall produce a Load/Unitization file for all 

produced documents in accordance with the following formatting:

OCR and Extracted Text Files (.TXT Files):

ESI shall be produced with multi-page searchable Extracted Text or OCR text. For documents 

that were originally stored as native electronic files and which do not have redactions, the extracted, 

full text from the body of each document will be produced. For documents that were originally stored 

as native electronic files and which have redactions, OCR text will be produced from the redacted 

image(s) associated with each document. Any such Extracted Text or OCR will be produced on a 

document level in the following format:

• Produce a single text file per document containing all the document’s pages

• Filenames must be matched bates number in this form:

• <Bates num>.txt

• Where <Bates num> is the BATES number of the first page in the document.

• Text must be encoded in UTF-8.

• Text files will be located in a directory named “TEXT” that is separate from the TIFF 

image.

Images Files:

• Single page per image

• Black and White Group IV TIFF

• Filenames for images must be matched bates number in this form:

• <Bates num>.<ext>

• Where <Bates num> is the BATES number of the page, and <ext> is the appropriate 

extension for the image format (.jpg, .tif).

Load/Unitization Files:

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 6 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 7 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

• “Concordance Default” delimited text file utilizing the following characters:

• The “comma” delimiter is ““ (020)

• The “quote” delimiter is “þ” (254)

• The “new line” delimiter is “®” (174)

• First line must contain the column/field names (set forth in Paragraph 1(c) herein)

• Every row must have the same number of columns/fields (empty values are acceptable)

• Text must be encoded in UTF-8

• LFP IPRO LOAD FILE with relative pathing to the image files or OPT OPTICON LOAD 

FILE with relative pathing to the images files in the format preferable to the Receiving 

Party

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties agree to further meet and confer, as necessary, in 

advance of any production of documents, and in consultation with their respective vendors, to confirm 

all Load/Unitization file specifications.

I. De-Duplication. To the extent that exact duplicate documents (based on MD5 or SHA-1 

hash values) reside within a party’s ESI data set, each party may produce only a single copy of a 

responsive document or record (“Single Production Copy”). Exact duplicates will be identified 

through calculation of MD5 or SHA-1 hash value and all de-duplication will occur at the family level 

and across all custodians.

J. Production Media. Documents shall be produced on CD-ROM, DVD, external hard drive 

(with standard PC compatible interface), .ftp site, or such other readily accessible computer or 

electronic media as the parties may hereafter agree upon (the “Production Media”). Each item of 

Production Media shall include: (1) the production date, and (2) the Bates number range of the 

materials contained on such Production Media item. Regardless of the form of the production, the 

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 7 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 8 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

materials may be password protected and/or encrypted, and any corresponding passwords or 

encryption keys shall be provided in a timely manner.

K. Document Metadata. Parties will produce extracted metadata for each document in the 

form of a .dat file, and include the following fields, as shown in the table below. If specific fields 

cannot be populated, the field should be left blank. When a metadata field includes a date, the date 

shall be provided in the following format in separate fields as specified below: mm/dd/yyyy or 

HH:mm:ss.

Field Description

Bates_Begin The Bates label of the first page of the document.

Bates_End The Bates label of the last page of the document.

Attach_Begin The Bates label of the first page of a family of 

documents (e.g., email and attachment).

Attach_End The Bates label of the last page of a family of 

documents (e.g., email and attachment).

File Name The filename of an attachment or stand-alone 

e-file.

Custodian The custodian(s) of the document.

Filename Extension The original filename extension suffix (e.g., 

.doc, .pps., .jpeg, .txt, .xls).

Subject The subject of an email.

Sent_Date For email, the sent date of the message.

Sent_Time For email, the sent time of the message.

Create_Date For efiles or attachments, the document’s 

creation date or operating system creation date.

Create_Time For efiles or attachments, the document’s 

creation time or operating system creation time.

Modified_Date For efiles or attachments, document’s last 

modified date or operating system last modified 

date.

Modified_Time For efiles or attachments, the document’s last 

modified time or operating system last modified 

time.

Author Original composer of a document or attachment.

From The sender of an email message.

To The recipients of an email message, in a 

semi-colon delimited multi-value list.

CC The copyee(s) of an email message, in a 

semi-colon delimited multi-value list.

BCC The blind copyee(s) of an email message, in a 

semi-colon delimited, multi-value list.

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 8 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 9 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

MD5/SHA-1 The calculated MD5 or SHA-1 hash value of the 

document.

Native_File The file path to the location of the native file if 

produced natively.

Confidentiality The confidentiality designation, if any, for the 

document pursuant to any protective order in the 

case.

Production Volume Name The name of the volume of the production the 

document was produced in.

Duplicate Custodians Identify all custodians who had an ESI copy of 

the produced document in list form separated by 

commas.

Processing Time Zone Time of processing in CST.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties will meet and confer in good faith as necessary prior 

to the production of documents, with technical experts as needed, to clarify or resolve any issues (e.g., 

definitions of metadata fields, inconsistencies, and burden) concerning the production of metadata.

L. Attachments. Email attachments must be mapped to their parent by the Document or 

Production number. BeginAttach and EndAttach fields must be populated for parent and child 

documents.

M. Structured Data. To the extent a response to discovery requires production of discoverable 

electronic information contained in a database, in lieu of producing the database, the parties may meet 

and confer, with an understanding of which fields are relevant, to attempt to agree upon the sets of 

data or fields to be included and generate a report in a reasonably usable and exportable electronic file 

(e.g., Excel or CSV format) for review by the requesting party or counsel. Upon review of the 

report(s), the requesting party may make reasonable requests for additional information to explain the 

database schema, codes, abbreviations, and different report formats or to request specific data from 

identified fields. The parties reserve all rights to object, including but not limited to objections for 

relevance, undue burden, and/ or inaccessibility.

7. PHASING

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 9 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 10 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

When a party propounds discovery requests pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, the parties agree to 

phase the production of ESI and the initial production will be from the following sources and 

custodians: individuals specifically identified in a party’s Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures, if responsive, and 

subject to any later agreements by the parties re prioritization of production. Following the initial 

production, the parties will continue to prioritize the order of subsequent productions.

8. DOCUMENTS PROTECTED FROM DISCOVERY

Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the production of a privileged or work-product-protected 

document, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of privilege or protection from discovery 

in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. For example, the mere production of privileged 

or work-product-protected documents in this case as part of a mass production is not itself a waiver in 

this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. The Protective Order entered in this case identifies 

the procedure for addressing disclosed Privileged Material.

9. PRIVILEGE LOGS AND REDACTIONS

a) Asserting privilege and/or work-product protection. A party who withholds or 

redacts ESI or documents on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and/or work product protection 

shall provide a privilege log in a native Excel format that contains the following, for each document 

withheld or redacted:

(i) A document control number (which shall be a Bates number in the case of 

partially-redacted documents);

(ii) Family relationship;

(iii) File type (.msg, .doc, .pdf, etc.);

(iv) Date;

(v) Author (or sender in the case of email);

(vi) Recipient(s) (or “TO” recipients in the case of email);

(vii) CC recipient(s);

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 10 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 11 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

(viii) BCC recipient(s);

(ix) Document name (or subject line in the case or email); and

(x) An indication of the privilege and/or protection being asserted (e.g. Attorney 

Client Privilege, Work Product, etc.).

b) The parties need not include a detailed description of the basis for privilege for each 

document in the first instance. The parties may request such information from the withholding party, 

by providing specific document control numbers. Any party receiving such a request for more-detailed 

information shall provide a document-by-document description sufficient to allow the other party and 

the Court to evaluate the claim of privilege/protection. 

c) Timing. The parties shall provide a rolling privilege log of withheld and redacted 

documents within 30 days after the document was withheld from production or the redacted document 

is produced.

d) Exceptions. Parties are not required to log documents withheld on the basis of 

privilege/protection in the following categories:

(i) Documents created after May 15, 2017 need not be logged.

(ii) Activities undertaken in compliance with the duty to preserve information are 

protected from disclosure and discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(3)(A) and 

(B).

10. MODIFICATION

This Stipulated Order may be modified by a Stipulated Order of the parties or by the Court for 

good cause shown.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 11 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 12 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

DATED: March 25, 2019 /s/ Benjamin A. Gastel

Jonathan Weissglass (SBN 185008)

jweissglass@altshulerberzon.com

ALTSHULER BERZON LLP

177 Post Street, Suite 300

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (310) 392-8801

Facsimile: (310) 278-5938

J. Gerard Stranch, IV (admitted pro hac vice)

gerards@bsjfirm.com

Benjamin A. Gastel (admitted pro hac vice)

beng@bsjfirm.com

BRANSTETTER, STRANCH & JENNINGS, PLLC

223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200

Nashville, TN 37203

Telephone: (615) 254-8801

Facsimile: (615) 255-5419

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Crystal Kao and Nina Barwick, individually and on 

behalf of herself and all others similarly situated

DATED: March 25, 2019 /s/ Anders Fjellstedt

Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice)

gregg.locascio@kirkland.com

Anders Fjellstedt (admitted pro hac vice)

anders.fjellstedt@kirkland.com

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004

Telephone: (202) 389-5000

Facsimile: (202) 389-5200

Mark McKane (SBN 230552)

mark.mckane@kirkland.com

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

555 California Street

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 439-1400

Facsimile: (415) 439-1500

Attorneys for Defendant

Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 12 of 13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE DISCOVERY

OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION 13 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-02790

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

DATED: March 25, 2019 /s/ Anders Fjellstedt

Anders Fjellstedt

IT IS SO ORDERED that the forgoing Agreement is approved.

DATED: _March 25, 2019_______ _____________________________________________

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-02790-JST Document 62 Filed 03/25/19 Page 13 of 13