Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01564/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01564-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN CALVERT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1564 DFL DAD PS

v. ORDER RE-SETTING STATUS

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CITY OF ISLETON, et al., CONFERENCE

Defendants.

 /

A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference was previously set in this case for November

3, 2006. By stipulation and order filed October 26, 2006, the Status Conference was continued to a

date to be selected by the court after the hearing on two motions that were set to be heard on December

1, 2006. The motions having been heard on December 1, 2006, and findings and recommendations

having been issued, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is re-set for August 3, 2007, at 11:00

a.m., in Courtroom 27, before the undersigned.

2. All parties shall appear at the Status Conference by counsel, or in person if acting

without counsel. Telephonic appearance will be permitted. To arrange telephonic appearance, counsel

or a party acting without counsel shall contact Pete Buzo, the courtroom deputy of the undersigned

magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, by 4:00 p.m. on August 1, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-01564-DAD Document 41 Filed 06/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. Each of the parties shall file and serve, no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 27, 2007, a

status report addressing the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof,

including disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut-off

dates for discovery and law and motion, and the

scheduling of a final pretrial conference and trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by

the rules due to the relative simplicity or complexity of

the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any other case, including

matters in bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge

assigned to this matter acting as settlement judge, waiving

any disqualifications by virtue of his so acting, or whether

they prefer to have a Settlement Conference before

another judge;

k. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a

United States Magistrate Judge; and

l. Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious

disposition of this action.

DATED: June 4, 2007.

DAD:kw

DDad1/orders.prose/calvert1564.ossc2

Case 2:06-cv-01564-DAD Document 41 Filed 06/04/07 Page 2 of 2