Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07185/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07185-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DUE DATE FOR RESPONSES TO AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; MASTER FILE NO. C-06-07185-PJH 

SARA B. BRODY (Bar No. 130222) 

LAWRENCE S. ACHORN (Bar No. 144407) 

BENJAMIN T. DIGGS (Bar No. 245904) 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

333 Bush Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415.772.6000 

Facsimile: 415.772.6268 

Email: Sara.Brody@hellerehrman.com 

 Larry.Achorn@hellerehrman.com 

 Benjamin.Diggs@hellerehrman.com 

NORMAN J. BLEARS (Bar No. 95600) 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

275 Middlefield Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: 650.324.7000 

Facsimile: 650.324.0638 

Email: Norman.Blears@hellerehrman.com 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

AUTODESK, INC. 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

Master File No. C-06-07185-PJH 

 DERIVATIVE ACTION 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING DUE DATE 

FOR RESPONSES TO AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

In re Autodesk, Inc. Derivative Litigation 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL MATTERS 

Case 4:06-cv-07185-PJH Document 50 Filed 04/04/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DUE DATE FOR RESPONSES TO AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; MASTER FILE NO. C-06-07185-PJH 

Plaintiffs and Defendants agree and stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s 

Amended Complaint is April 4, 2008; and 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in their own interests and the interests of 

judicial economy to postpone the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Amended 

Complaint until Friday, April 18, 2008; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: 

1. The deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint 

is postponed to April 18, 2008. 

2. If any Defendant files any motion challenging the sufficiency of the 

Amended Complaint, Lead Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition 

thereto within 60 days from the service of such motion, and Defendants’ 

reply shall be due 30 days after service of the opposition. 

Dated: April 3, 2008 LYNN LINCOLN SARKO 

JULI E. FARRIS 

ELIZABETH A. LELAND 

TYLER L. FARMER 

KELLER ROHRBACK LLP 

By: /s/ Juli E. Farris 

 Juli E. Farris 

Chairman, Plaintiff’s Executive Committee 

Dated: April 3, 2008 SARA B. BRODY 

NORMAN BLEARS 

LAWRENCE S. ACHORN 

BENJAMIN T. DIGGS 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Sara B. Brody 

 Sara B. Brody 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

AUTODESK, INC. 

Case 4:06-cv-07185-PJH Document 50 Filed 04/04/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DUE DATE FOR RESPONSES TO AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; MASTER FILE NO. C-06-07185-PJH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The above stipulation having been considered, and good cause appearing therefore, 

the Court orders as follows:

1. The deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is 

postponed to April 18, 2008. 

2. If any Defendant files any motion challenging the sufficiency of the 

Amended Complaint, Lead Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition 

thereto within 60 days from the service of such motion, and Defendants’ 

reply shall be due 30 days after service of the opposition. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________, 2007 

HON. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

April 4

Case 4:06-cv-07185-PJH Document 50 Filed 04/04/08 Page 3 of 3