Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05412/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05412-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E. & J. GALLO WINERY, )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

)

ENCANA ENERGY SERVICES, INC., )

a Delaware corporation, formerly known )

as PANCANADIAN ENERGY )

SERVICES INC.; ENCANA )

CORPORATION, a Canadian )

corporation, formerly known as and )

successor to PANCANADIAN )

ENERGY CORPORATION, )

)

Defendants )

)

)

)

)

)

)

____________________________________)

CV F 03-5412 AWI LJO

ORDER SEALING

DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF

IN SUPPORT OF MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF

CONSPIRACY AND

ANTITRUST INJURY;

DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO

GALLO'S STATEMENT OF

ADDITIONAL FACTS IN

CONNECTION WITH

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON

CAUSATION AND BREADTH

OF THE ALLEGED

CONSPIRACY; and

DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE

TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE

TO DEFENDANTS'

SEPARATE STATEMENT OF

UNDISPUTED MATERIAL

FACTS IN SUPPORT OF

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT 

The Court has considered the Defendants' Application To Lodge Defendants' Reply

Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Issues of

Conspiracy and Antitrust Injury; Defendants' Reply to Gallo's Statements of Additional Facts

Case 1:03-cv-05412-LJO -DLB Document 664 Filed 08/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

in Connection with Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Causation and Breadth of

the Alleged Conspiracy; and Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Response to Defendants'

Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Motion for Summary

Judgment (filed August 23, 2005 under seal). 

The Court has determined that there is good cause to GRANT the Defendants'

application and to accept the following documents for lodging under seal:

(a) Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment or

Partial Summary Judgment on Issues of Conspiracy and Antitrust Injury; 

(b) Defendants' Reply to Gallo's Statements of Additional Facts in Connection

with Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Causation and Breadth of the Alleged

Conspiracy;

(c) Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Separate

Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the foregoing documents be filed under seal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 25, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

h2ehf UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05412-LJO -DLB Document 664 Filed 08/25/05 Page 2 of 2