Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02948/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02948-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. CV 05-2948 MMC [PROP.] SEALING ORDER 

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) griley@omm.com 

DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003) dsnyder@omm.com 

MICHELLE L. DAVIDSON (S.B. #218559) mdavidson@omm.com 

DAVID S. ALMELING (S.B. #235449) dalmeling@omm.com 

SANDEEP N. SOLANKI (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ssolanki@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendants 

OrthoClear, Inc. and 

OrthoClear Holdings, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

ORTHOCLEAR, INC. and 

ORTHOCLEAR HOLDINGS, INC., 

Defendant.

Case No. CV 05-2948 MMC 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE CONFIDENTIAL 

DOCUMENTS (ATTACHED TO 

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO ALIGN’S 

OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE) UNDER 

SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 

RULE 79-5 

Hearing Date: August 18, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 7 

Judge: Hon. Maxine Chesney 

Case 3:05-cv-02948-MMC Document 272 Filed 08/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. CV 05-2948 MMC 1 [PROP.] SEALING ORDER 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 and the Protective Order previously entered in this 

action, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants OrthoClear, Inc. and OrthoClear Holdings, 

Inc.’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File Confidential Documents (Attached to Defendants’ 

Response to Align’s Objections to Evidence) Under Seal Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 is 

GRANTED. 

As specified in Defendants’ motion, the following documents are to be SEALED: 

1. Exhibit A (excerpt from the deposition of Jeffrey Tunnell) to the Declaration of 

David S. Almeling in Support of Defendants’ Response to Align Technology Inc.’s Objection to 

Evidence in Support of Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment (“Almeling Objections to 

Evidence Declaration”). 

2. Exhibit B (excerpt from the deposition of Joe Breeland) to the Almeling 

Objections to Evidence Declaration. 

3. Exhibit C (excerpt from the deposition of Keith Wolf) to the Almeling Objections 

to Evidence Declaration. 

4. The unredacted version of Defendants’ Response to Align Technology Inc.’s 

Objection to Evidence in Support of Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 9, 2006 

 ______________________________________ 

 Hon. Maxine Chesney 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-02948-MMC Document 272 Filed 08/09/06 Page 2 of 2