Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01814/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01814-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLISON, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:10-cv-01814-LJO-JLT (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE A 

SUPPLEMENT TO THE THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

(Docs. 121, 135)

Plaintiff, Lawrence Christopher Smith, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 which he filed on October 1, 2010. The 

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 

Local Rule 302. 

On April 7, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations to deny 

Plaintiff's motion to file a supplement to the Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. 135.) The 

Findings and Recommendations were served that same day and contained provisions for the 

parties to file objections within thirty days. Despite lapse of more than the allowed time, neither 

side has filed any objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

/ / /

Case 1:10-cv-01814-DAD-JLT Document 147 Filed 06/01/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. the Findings and Recommendations that issued on April 7, 2015 (Doc. 135) is 

adopted in full; and 

2. the motion to supplement the Third Amended Complaint, which Plaintiff filed on 

December 11, 2014 (Doc. 121), is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 1, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01814-DAD-JLT Document 147 Filed 06/01/15 Page 2 of 2