Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03562/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03562-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Submitting Counsel on Signature Page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SCOTT SALYER, individually, and as

Trustee of the Scott Salyer Revocable Trust,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SALYER AMERICAN FRESH FOODS, et

al.,

Defendants.

1. PURPOSE AND LIMITATIONS

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure

and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted.

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated

Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all

disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited

information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as

confidential. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 10, below, that this Stipulated

Protective Order creates no entitlement to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule

79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied

when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.

No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

*E-FILED 8/18/06*

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 1 of 14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Party: Any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors,

employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff).

2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless of the

medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony,

transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to

discovery in this matter.

2.3 “Confidential” Information or Items: Information (regardless of how

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under standards

developed under Fed .R. Civ. P. 26(c).

2.4 “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or Items:

Extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” whose disclosure to another Party or nonparty would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive

means.

2.5 Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from

a Producing Party.

2.6 Producing Party: A Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or Discovery

Material in this action.

2.7 Designating Party: A Party or non-party that designates information or items

that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential

– Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

2.8 Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated

as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

2.9 Outside Counsel: Attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are

retained to represent or advise a Party in this action.

2.10 House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a Party.

2.11 Counsel: (Without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well

as their support staffs).

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 2 of 14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2.12 Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter

pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert

witness or as a consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or of a

competitor of a Party’s and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee

of a Party or a competitor of a Party’s. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant

retained in connection with this litigation.

2.13 Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support

services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations,

organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium, etc.) and their employees and

subcontractors.

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as

defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies,

excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by

parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material.

4. DURATION

Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this

Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order

otherwise directs.

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection: Each

Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take

care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.

A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of material,

documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the

material, documents, items or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept

unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 3 of 14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 4 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are

shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose unnecessary expenses

and burdens on the other parties), expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items that it

designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of

protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is

withdrawing the mistaken designation.

5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations: Except as otherwise provided in this

Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,

material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the

material is disclosed or produced.

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

(a) For information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of

depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” at the bottom

of each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page

qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g.,

by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of

protection being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”).

A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which

material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of

the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants

copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof,

qualify for protection under this Order, then, before producing the specified documents, the

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 4 of 14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 5 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) at the bottom of each page that contains

Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection,

the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted

(either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”).

(b) For testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial

proceedings. That the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the

record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and

further specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of

testimony that is entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the testimony

may qualify for protection, the Party or non-party that sponsors, offers, or gives the testimony may

invoke on the record (before the deposition or proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to 20 days

to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the

level of protection being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately

designated for protection within the 20 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated

Protective Order.

Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by

the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as instructed by the Party or nonparty offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony.

(c) For information produced in some form other than documentary, and for

any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the

container or containers in which the information is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only portions of the information

or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 5 of 14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 6 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

portions, specifying whether they qualify as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’

Eyes Only.”

5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate: If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure

to designate qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’

Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under

this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as “Confidential” or “Highly

Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party,

on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is

treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

6.1 Timing of Challenges: Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s

confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary

economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive

its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly

after the original designation is disclosed.

6.2 Meet and Confer: A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating

Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by

conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient)

with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party must explain the basis

for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party

an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change

in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A challenging Party may

proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer

process first.

6.3 Judicial Intervention: A party that elects to press a challenge to a

confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party may

file and serve a motion under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if

applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge.

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 6 of 14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 7 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the movant has

complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that sets

forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the

Designating Party in the meet and confer dialogue.

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the

Designating Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the

material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s

designation.

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

7.1 Basic Principles: A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is

disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for

prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be

disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When

the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 11,

below (FINAL DISPOSITION).

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location

and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.

7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Unless otherwise

ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may

disclose any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to:

(a) The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as

employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this

litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to be Bound by Protective Order” that is attached

hereto as Exhibit “A”;

(b) The officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the

Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed

the “Agreement to be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A);

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 7 of 14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 8 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to be

Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A);

(d) The Court and its personnel;

(e) Court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure

is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to be Bound by

Protective Order” (Exhibit A);

(f) During their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is

reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to be Bound by Protective Order”

(Exhibit A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal

Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to

anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order.

(g) The author of the document or the original source of the information, as

well as any listed recipients of the document.

7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”

Information or Items: Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the

Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:

(a) The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as

employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this

litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to be Bound by Protective Order” that is attached

hereto as Exhibit A;

(b) Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably

necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to be Bound by Protective Order”

(Exhibit A);

(c) The Court and its personnel;

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 8 of 14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 9 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(d) Court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure

is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to be Bound by

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and

(e) The author of the document or the original source of the information, as

well as any listed recipients of the document.

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN

OTHER LITIGATION

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that

would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the

Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) immediately

and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification

must include a copy of the subpoena or court order.

The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who caused the

subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation, that some or all of the material covered by the

subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must

deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the Party in the other action that

caused the subpoena or order to issue.

The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this

Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its

confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The Designating

Party shall bear the burdens and expenses of seeking protection in that court of its confidential

material – and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a

Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order,

the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 9 of 14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 10 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the

person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and

(d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to be Bound”

that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

10. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL

Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order secured after

appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this action

any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply

with Civil Local Rule 79-5.

11. FINAL DISPOSITION

Unless otherwise ordered or agreed to in writing by the Producing Party, within sixty days

after the final termination of this action, each Requesting Party must return all Protected Material to

the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies,

abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of the

Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating Party, the Receiving Party may

destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether the Protected Material

is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing

Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty day deadline that

identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected material that was returned or destroyed

and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations,

summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material.

Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings,

motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if such

materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected

Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION), above.

12. MISCELLANEOUS

12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person

to seek its modification by the Court in the future.

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 10 of 14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 11 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective

Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any

information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no

Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by

this Protective Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

DATED: August 16, 2006 GORDON & REES LLP

By

/s/

Brian P. Maschler, Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: August 16, 2006 GRUNSKY, EBEY, FARRAR & HOWELL

By

/s/

Rebecca Connolly, Attorneys for Defendant

Salyer American Fresh Foods

DATED: August 16, 2006 SPIERING, SWARTZ & KENNEDY

By

/s/

Andrew H. Swartz, Attorneys for Defendants

Thomas Welch, Donald Blodgett and Lawrence

Ryan

DATED: August 16, 2006 Foley & Bezek LLP

By

/s/

Thomas G. Foley, Attorneys for Fred Salyer and

Linda Salyer Lee

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 11 of 14
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No. C 05-3562 JW (RS)

- 12 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____________________ ______________________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

August 18, 2006

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 12 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

I, ___________________________________ [print or type full name], of _______________

___________________________________________[print or type full address], declare under

penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that

was issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on __________

in the case of Salyer v. Salyer American Fresh Foods, Inc., et al., Case No: C05-3562 JW (RS). I

agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I

understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment

in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that that I will not disclose in any manner any

information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except

in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the

Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective

Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

I hereby appoint ______________________________ [print or type full name] of

________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as my

California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to

enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.

Date: ___________________________________

City and State where sworn and signed: ______________________________

Printed name: _______________________________

Signature:___________________________________

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 13 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

I, Rebecca Connolly, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained

from each of the other signatories.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 16th

day of August, 2006, at Watsonville, California.

By: /s/ Rebecca Connolly

Case 5:05-cv-03562-JW Document 62 Filed 08/18/06 Page 14 of 14