Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00606/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00606-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AHKEEM WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

KIM PEDRIERO, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:12-cv-00606-SKO (PC)

ORDER DENYING UNTIMELY MOTION 

TO COMPEL

(Doc. 84)

Plaintiff Akheem Williams (“Plaintiff”), a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 17, 2012. This 

action is proceeding against Defendants Garcia, Valdez, Cortez, Silva, Castro, Day, Stepp, Collier, 

Torres, Delia, Jr., and Tordsen (“Defendants”) for use of excessive physical force, in violation of 

the United States Constitution. 

On February 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel. Defendants filed an opposition on 

February 25, 2014.1 The motion has been submitted upon the record without oral argument. 

Local Rule 230(l).

The deadline for the completion of all discovery was November 12, 2013, and Plaintiff’s 

motion to modify the scheduling order was denied on December 4, 2013. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). 

///

///

 

1 Defendants’ request for sanctions will be addressed by separate order.

Case 1:12-cv-00606-SKO Document 91 Filed 03/18/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

(Docs. 18, 78.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to compel is HEREBY DENIED as untimely.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 17, 2014 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00606-SKO Document 91 Filed 03/18/14 Page 2 of 2