Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01091/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01091-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

-1-

Stipulation and Order. No. 3:15-CV-01091-WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Thompson Pacific Construction, Inc.,

 

 Plaintiff,

v.

American International Group, Inc., 

American Int’l Specialty, Chartis 

Specialty Insurance Company, Chartis 

Property Casualty Company, Chartis 

Casualty Company, and Does 1 through 

100,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:15-CV-01091-WHO

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION

This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiff Thompson Pacific 

Construction, Inc. (“TPC”), and Defendants American International Group, Inc.

(AIG Inc.) and AIG Specialty Insurance Company (AIG Specialty), joint Stipulation

as follows:

1. TPC’s action against AIG, Inc. will be stayed and AIG, Inc.’s motion to 

dismiss will be taken off calendar. Within 30 days after TPC obtains full and 

complete copies of all of the insurance policies issued by AIG and/or its subsidiaries

as identified in AIG, Inc.’s and/or AIG Specialty’s moving papers, TPC will either:

Case 3:15-cv-01091-WHO Document 19 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Stipulation and Order. No. 3:15-CV-01091-WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

a. Dismiss AIG, Inc. if each of the full and complete policies are 

produced and show that AIG, Inc. is not a party to any of those policies, or

b. File its opposition to AIG, Inc.’s motion to dismiss, upon which a 

hearing date will be scheduled.

2. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 15(a)(1)(B), TPC 

will file a First Amended Complaint by April 3, 2015. 

3. AIG Specialty will take its motion to dismiss or, alternatively for a more 

definite statement off calendar, without prejudice.

The Court having reviewed the joint Stipulation; and after due deliberation and 

sufficient cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that the joint Stipulation is

hereby granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2015 By: ________________________

Judge William H. Orrick

Federal District Court Judge.

Case 3:15-cv-01091-WHO Document 19 Filed 03/27/15 Page 2 of 2