Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-64/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO STAY [DKT. 506] 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099 

tboutrous@gibsondunn.com 

DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289 

dwongyang@gibsondunn.com 

MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308 

mmcrae@gibsondunn.com 

THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 

tevangelis@gibsondunn.com 

DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, 

SBN 254433 

dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com 

BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325 

bstoker@gibsondunn.com 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 

Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 

jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com 

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289 

kringdowell@gibsondunn.com 

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 

Telephone: 415.393.8200 

Facsimile: 415.393.8306 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS 

COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and 

ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-3826-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR 

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY [DKT. 

506] 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice 

ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 

Boston, MA 02116 

Telephone: (617) 994-5800 

Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 

sliss@llrlaw.com 

apagano@llrlaw.com 

MATTHEW CARLSON (SBN 273242) 

(mcarlson@llrlaw.com) 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

466 Geary St., Suite 201 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Telephone: (617) 994-5800 

Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, 

MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE 

GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 515 Filed 04/13/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO STAY [DKT. 506] 

 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Douglas 

O’Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Uber 

Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree as follows: 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court’s Order (Dkt. 508), Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s 

Motion to Stay, is currently due on April 13, 2016; 

 WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed to a brief extension of one week for 

Plaintiffs to file their Opposition until April 20, 2016; 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that: 

(1) Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Stay, will be due on April 20, 2016. 

Dated: April 13, 2016 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN 

ADELAIDE PAGANO 

MATTHEW CARLSON 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

By: /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, 

MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE GURFINKEL, 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated, 

Dated: April 13, 2016 THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. 

DEBRA WONG YANG 

MARCELLUS A. MCRAE 

THEANE D. EVANGELIS 

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ 

DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA 

BRANDON J. STOKER 

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By: /s/ Kevin J. Ring-Dowell 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 515 Filed 04/13/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO STAY [DKT. 506] 

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: ____________________ 

 Hon. Edward M. Chen 

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

4/13/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 515 Filed 04/13/16 Page 3 of 3