Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00210/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00210-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1333 Admiralty

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL

Case No. C 05 00210 JSW; Our File: 2900.63

STANLEY L. GIBSON (047882)

JENNIFER T. SANCHEZ (191548)

GIBSON ROBB & LINDH LLP

100 First Street, 27 Floor th

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 348-6000

Facsimile: (415) 348-6001

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JERICO PRODUCTS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERICO PRODUCTS, INC., a California

Corporation, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SONOMA MARIN AREA RAIL TRANSIT

DISTRICT, a regional transit district

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 05 00210 JSW

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND

DISMISSAL, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

GRANTING DISMISSAL BUT

RETAINING JURISDICTION OVER

SETTLEMENT 

STIPULATION

The parties, plaintiff Jerico Products, Inc. (JERICO) through its attorneys and defendant

Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit District, SMART (SMART) through its attorneys, report that

following a settlement conference last September with Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman,

the parties have entered into a settlement agreement. This is an unusual case in that the

settlement does not require a monetary payment, but requires the parties to undertake certain

actions. The parties’ agreed obligations will continue through at least November 1, 2007.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:05-cv-00210-JSW Document 42 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cv-00210-JSW Document 43 Filed 07/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL

Case No. C 05 00210 JSW; Our File: 2900.63 - 2 -

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), and to the Court’s order of July 18,

2006 denying a request for a stay in this action, the parties stipulate to the dismissal of this action

without prejudice, and further stipulate to the Court retaining jurisdiction through November 1,

2007.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: July 25, 2006 GIBSON ROBB & LINDH LLP

By: S/ JENNIFER TOMLIN SANCHEZ 

Jennifer Tomlin Sanchez

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC

Dated: July 25, 2006 CHRISTOPHER J. NEARY

By: S/ CHRISTOPHER J. NEARY 

Christopher J. Neary

Attorneys for Defendant

SONOMA MARIN AREA RAIL

TRANSIT DISTRICT

ORDER ON STIPULATION

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, the Court having

considered the stipulation of the parties to dismiss this action without prejudice and for the Court

to retain jurisdiction over the settlement through November 1, 2007, and good cause appearing

therefor, hereby orders that this action is dismissed without prejudice, and that this Court retains

jurisdiction over the terms of the parties’ settlement until November 1, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________, 2006 ______________________________

JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES

DISTRICT COURT, FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF 

CALIFORNIA

Case 3:05-cv-00210-JSW Document 42 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 2

July 26

Case 3:05-cv-00210-JSW Document 43 Filed 07/26/06 Page 2 of 2