Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05429/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05429-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 

[PROPOSED ORDER] 

CASE NO. C-04-5429-CW (EMC) 

SVCA_27975.1

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

1530 PAGE MILL ROAD 

PALO ALTO, CA 94304 

TELEPHONE: (650) 251-1114 FAX: (650) 856-3710

DAVID B. MOYER, BAR NO. 197739 

dmoyer@foley.com 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

3000 K ST., N.W. 

WASHINGTON, DC 20007 

TELEPHONE: 202.672.5300 

FACSIMILE: 202.672.5399 

LARRY L. SHATZER, PRO HAC VICE

lshatzer@foley.com 

GEORGE C. BEST, PRO HAC VICE

gbest@foley.com 

LIANE M. PETERSON, PRO HAC VICE

lpeterson@foley.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, INSMED

INCORPORATED AND CELTRIX

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

GENENTECH, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

TERCICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

INSMED INCORPORATED, a Virginia 

Corporation, and CELTRIX 

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation.

 Defendants. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C-04-5429-CW (EMC) 

STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING 

ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

COMPEL PRODUCTION OF 

DOCUMENTS; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Date: December 21, 2005 

Time: 10:30 a.m. 

Location: Courtroom C 

 15th Floor 

The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

 WHEREAS, Defendants and Counterclaimants Insmed Incorporated and Celtrix 

Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed on September 28, 2005 a Motion to Compel seeking the production of 

all documents responsive to Defendants’ Second Request for Production of Documents or Patent 

Local Rule 3-2(b) that are held by Sydney South West Area Health Service (“SSWAHS”), 

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 261 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 

[PROPOSED ORDER] 

CASE NO. C-04-5429-CW (EMC) 

SVCA_27975.1

 WHEREAS, at the hearing on Defendants’ motion which was held on November 22, 

2005, the Court directed Plaintiffs to continue their efforts to obtain responsive documents from 

SSWAHS, and continued the hearing on Defendants’ motion until December 21, 2005 at 10:30 

a.m.; 

 WHEREAS, on December 16, 2005, Dr. Robert Baxter testified that laboratory 

notebooks and correspondence relating to his and Janet Martin’s work related to U.S. Patent No. 

5,258,287 remained in his possession in Australia when he left the employment of Royal Prince 

Alfred Hospital (the predecessor of SSWAHS); that he had previously copied and provided to 

Plaintiffs’ counsel for production such documents and had brought additional documents with 

him to the December 16, 2005 deposition; and that he did not know whether Royal Prince Alfred 

Hospital had additional documents, but that he did not leave behind at Royal Prince Alfred 

Hospital copies of any of the documents relating to his work; 

 WHEREAS, on December 16, 2005, Plaintiffs’ counsel forwarded a Declaration from 

Janelle Whalan, SSWAHS’s Area Director of Corporate Services, which includes a description 

of SSWAHS’s efforts to locate responsive documents and represents that some additional 

documents have been discovered in addition to those previously forwarded to Plaintiffs’ counsel 

and are being forwarded to Plaintiffs’ counsel, although it is not known whether such documents 

are relevant or responsive to Defendants’ requests; 

 WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have not yet had an opportunity to review the 

additional documents discovered by SSWAHS to determine if they are relevant and responsive, 

and as such, to otherwise determine whether the issues presented in Defendants’ motion to 

compel have been fully resolved; 

 WHEREAS, the parties expect to be able to complete their review and determination by 

January 11, 2006; and 

 WHEREAS, the parties are informed that the first available hearing date after January 11, 

2006 is January 18, 2006 at 10:30 a.m.;

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, through their 

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 261 Filed 12/20/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 

[PROPOSED ORDER] 

CASE NO. C-04-5429-CW (EMC) 

SVCA_27975.1

respective counsel, that the continued hearing on Defendants’ motion scheduled for December 

21, 2005 at 10:30 a.m. should further be continued until January 18, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. 

DATED: DECEMBER 20, 2005 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

BY______________/S/___________________

DAVID B. MOYER

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS AND 

COUNTERCLAIMANTS INSMED

INCORPORATED AND CELTRIX

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

DATED: DECEMBER 20, 2005 HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE 

LLP

BY_____________/S/____________________

ETHAN C. GLASS

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

GENENTECH, INC.

DATED: DECEMBER 20, 2005 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

BY______________/S/___________________

DAVID L. LARSON

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

TERCICA, INC.

 Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Ethan C. Glass and 

David L. Larson, the signatories listed above. 

DATED: DECEMBER 20, 2005 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

BY_____________/S/____________________

DAVID B. MOYER

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS AND 

COUNTERCLAIMANTS INSMED

INCORPORATED AND CELTRIX

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 261 Filed 12/20/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 

[PROPOSED ORDER] 

CASE NO. C-04-5429-CW (EMC) 

SVCA_27975.1

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED:

_________________________________

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

December 20, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 261 Filed 12/20/05 Page 4 of 4