Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01691/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01691-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 

---

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ENOVSYS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T MOBILITY II LLC,

Defendants-Cross-Appellants

______________________ 

2016-1691, 2016-1767

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in No. 2:11-cv-05210-SS, 

Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

BRUCE G. CHAPMAN, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & 

Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiffappellant.

MICHAEL HAWES, Baker Botts, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for defendants-cross-appellants. Also represented by 

BRYANT C. BOREN, JR., ELIOT DAMON WILLIAMS, Palo Alto, 

CA; TIMOTHY S. DURST, BRIAN DOUGLAS JOHNSTON, Dallas, TX. 

______________________ 

Case: 16-1691 Document: 63-2 Page: 1 Filed: 03/10/2017
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 March 10, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

Case: 16-1691 Document: 63-2 Page: 2 Filed: 03/10/2017