Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02406/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02406-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Plaintiff’s first motion, filed November 4, 2002, was denied on January 6, 2003. 1

Plaintiff’s second motion, filed March 31, 2004, was denied August 17, 2004.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES EDWARD VAN NORT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-2406 WBS JFM P

vs.

A.M. RAMIREZ-PALMER, WARDEN, 

et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff Van Nort is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff Van Nort is confined to a wheelchair and requires

housing in a lower bunk next to a bathroom due to his medical needs. (See July 2, 2004 Findings

and Recommendations, at 4.) On January 27, 2006, plaintiff filed a third motion for temporary

restraining order.1

Plaintiff Van Nort contends defendants have moved him to a second floor dorm in

retaliation for the instant lawsuit. By order filed February 6, 2006, defendants were directed to

file a response. On February 21, 2006, defendants filed their opposition to the motion and on

March 2, 2006, plaintiff filed his reply. 

Case 2:02-cv-02406-LKK -JFM Document 83 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

This matter is set for jury trial before the Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton on

Tuesday, April 4, 2006. Given the proximity of the trial date, there is insufficient time to issue

findings and recommendations on plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. 

It is likely that plaintiff Van Nort’s housing will be different during the trial in

response to the writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. However, all parties are directed to be

prepared to discuss the question of housing on the first day of trial.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all parties are

directed to be prepared to discuss the question of housing on the first day of trial. 

DATED: March 28, 2006.

 

/001; vann2406.mot

Case 2:02-cv-02406-LKK -JFM Document 83 Filed 03/29/06 Page 2 of 2