Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02165/USCOURTS-ca4-09-02165-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2165

DHIRAJ CHHAPARWAL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WEST VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES 

CENTER; UNIVERSITY HEALTH ASSOCIATES; NORMAN FERRARI, III, 

M.D.; MARTIN WEISSE, M.D.; MATHEW BRUNNER, M.D.; NANCY 

BRUNNER, M.D.; KATHLEEN PERKINS, M.D.; JENNIFER PUMPHREY, 

M.D.; JEAN SOMESHWAR, M.D.; MELISSA LARZO, M.D.; MEGAN 

TROISCHT, M.D.; HEATHER HIXENBAUGH, M.D.; MICHAEL WOLFE; 

JOHN/JANE DOES I-X, 

Defendants – Appellees,

and

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INCORPORATED; BRUCE 

MCCLYMONDS, President and CEO, 

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00089-FPS-JSK)

Submitted: May 18, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 09-2165 Doc: 23 Filed: 06/09/2010 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Dhiraj Chhaparwal, Appellant Pro Se. Christi R.B. Stover, 

STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Morgantown, West Virginia; Richard 

Michael Yurko, Jr., STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Clarksburg, West 

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-2165 Doc: 23 Filed: 06/09/2010 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Dhiraj Chhaparwal appeals the district court’s order 

granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on 

Chhaparwal’s complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Chhaparwal v. WV College of Medicine, 

No. 1:07-cv-00089-FPS-JSK (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 9, 2009). We also 

deny Chhaparwal’s motion for transcripts at government expense. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-2165 Doc: 23 Filed: 06/09/2010 Pg: 3 of 3