Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01821/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01821-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY PINSON,

 Plaintiff,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

 Defendant.

Case No. 1:13-cv-1821-AWI-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE 

RELIEF

(ECF No. 65)

CASE TO REMAIN OPEN

Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 

Privacy Act and civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States 

District Court for the Eastern District of California.

On June 16, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations

to deny Plaintiff’s motion for declaratory and injunctive relief. (ECF No. 65.) No 

objections were filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has 

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

proper analysis.

Case 1:13-cv-01821-AWI-MJS Document 69 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court adopts the findings and recommendations, filed June 16, 2015

(ECF No. 65), in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s February 10, 2015 motion for declaratory and injunctive relief 

(ECF No. 46) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 9, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01821-AWI-MJS Document 69 Filed 07/10/15 Page 2 of 2