Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01053/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01053-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLEOFAS GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DR. BOPARI, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:12cv01053 LJO DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND 

DISMISSING DEFENDANT GRIMM 

(Document 37)

Plaintiff Cleofas Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on 

June 28, 2012. Pursuant to Court order, he filed a Second Amended Complaint on December 23, 

2013. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 2, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 

Defendant Grimm be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to effectuate service of process. The 

Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any 

objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. No 

objections have been filed. 

Case 1:12-cv-01053-LJO-DLB Document 39 Filed 01/08/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 

a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 2, 2014, are ADOPTED in 

full; and

2. Defendant Grimm is DISMISSED from this action for Plaintiff’s failure to 

effectuate service of process. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 7, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01053-LJO-DLB Document 39 Filed 01/08/15 Page 2 of 2