Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-04494/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-04494-38/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIFESCAN SCOTLAND, LTD., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 11-cv-04494-WHO 

ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Re: Dkt. No. 495

Defendants oppose Lifescan’s request to extend the briefing schedule for the motion for 

summary judgment. Each party offered a compromise modified schedule that was close to the 

other’s. Given the impending need for Lifescan to file its opposition, absent court order, I 

ORDER that plaintiffs’ response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment be filed on or 

before January 19, 2016. The reply shall be filed by February 3, 2016, and the hearing is set for 

February 17, 2016. The parties shall cooperate in setting any necessary depositions in sufficient 

time so that they comply with the amended briefing schedule.

Lifescan also asks that I preclude Dr. Wang and any other expert for defendants from 

making a further expert report on validity. Defendants did not respond to this request. If 

defendants oppose it, they should file a statement of no more than two pages by December 3, 

2015, explaining why and addressing plaintiffs’ concern regarding piecemeal expert discovery. I 

will then decide whether to modify this Order in any way.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 30, 2015

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:11-cv-04494-WHO Document 498 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 1