Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00500/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00500-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

{10277-18 00353839.DOCX 1 } JOINT 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH 

(No. CV 13-03138 PSG) 

TOMAS MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555

HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196 

Justice at Work Law Group 

84 W. Santa Clara St., Ste. 790 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Tel: (408) 317-1100 

Fax: (408) 351-0105 

Tomas@JAWLawGroup.com 

Huy@JAWLawGroup.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MARTIN NAVARRO 

PAUL V. SIMPSON, BAR NO. 83878 

SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI 

Professional Corporation 

601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 950 

South San Francisco, CA 94080 

Telephone: (650) 615-4860 

Fax: (650) 615-4861 

psimpson@sgijlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARTIN NAVARRO 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 15-CV-500 EMC

STIPULATION AND & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO DISMISS MATTER 

 

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN 

WHEREAS the parties conducted a confidential mediation session sponsored by this 

Court on October 15, 2015 and the Parties reached a complete settlement of the named Plaintiff 

Navarro’s claims in the above-captioned matter. 

Case 3:15-cv-00500-EMC Document 33 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 3
 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

{10277-18 00353839.DOCX 1 } STIPULATION 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

DISMISSAL 

1. 

WHEREAS the investigation into this mater showed that at most there are 13 other 

loop crew workers during the relevant period and, therefore, the number of potential FLSA opt-in 

plaintiffs does not satisfy the numerosity requirement for certification of a FLSA collective action. 

See Cox v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co., 784 F.2d 1546, 1553 (11th Cir. 1986) cert. denied 479 U.S. 

883 (1986). 

WHEREAS the claims of the potential opt-in plaintiffs were not negotiated, 

compromised or otherwise affected by the settlement; 

WHEREAS the settlement calls for a Dismissal Without Prejudice of any FLSA 

claims that can potentially involve workers other than Plaintiff NAVARRO; 

WHEREAS the settlement calls for a Dismissal Without Prejudice of the Sixth Claim 

for Relied in the First Amended Complaint under the Private Attorney General Act of 2004, 

California Labor Code section 2698 et seq. 

WHEREAS the settlement calls for a Dismissal With Prejudice of all Plaintiff 

NAVARRO’s remaining claims in the First Amended Complaint. 

WHERAS the parties desire the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the payment 

provisions in the settlement agreement only through February 1, 2016. 

The Parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] 

Order requesting dismissal. Thus, the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, respectfully 

request that the Court enter this Stipulation as an Order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Dated: October 21, 2015 //s// Tomas E. Margain 

TOMAS MARGAIN 

Counsel for Plaintiff MARTIN NAVARRO 

Dated: October 21, 2015 //s// PAUL V. SIMPSON 

PAUL V. SIMPSON 

Counsel for Defendant ST. FRANCIS 

ELECTRIC, INC. 

Case 3:15-cv-00500-EMC Document 33 Filed 10/23/15 Page 2 of 3
 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

{10277-18 00353839.DOCX 1 } STIPULATION 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

DISMISSAL 

2. 

ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, and Good Cause 

appearing therefore, that the above entitled action is hereby dismissed as follows: 

The Sixth Claim for Relief in the First Amended Complaint under the Private 

Attorney General Act of 2004, California Labor Code section 2698 et seq. is hereby dismissed 

without prejudice. 

As to the FLSA claim, the First Claim for relief, this Order is specifically without 

prejudice with respect to any rights, whether they exist or not, of anyone other than Plaintiff Martin 

Navarro. 

All other claims are dismissed with prejudice and as such the First Amended 

Complaint is also ordered dismissed in its entirety. 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to vacate all future dates and close the file. 

The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the payment terms of the agreement through 

February 1, 2016 only. 

Each side shall bear its own costs and fees.

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: By:

 EDWARD M. CHEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

JUDGE

 

10/23/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00500-EMC Document 33 Filed 10/23/15 Page 3 of 3