Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02170/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02170-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Many inmates apparently believe that they will receive an immediate payout from a fund

established in Hart v. Hill, No. CV 77-0479-PHX-EHC (MS) (D. Ariz.). No such fund exists. The

inmates in Hart asked for injunctive relief and not monetary damages. The Court at this time

expresses no opinion on whether Plaintiff’s lawsuit may result in an award of damages.

JDDL-K - 1 -

RP

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Juan Lopez, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Peterson, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-05-2170-PHX-DGC (ECV)

ORDER

Juan Lopez (Plaintiff), presently confined in the Maricopa County Durango Jail in

Phoenix, Arizona (Durango Jail), filed with the Clerk of the Court a pro se "Civil Rights

Complaint By A Prisoner" (Document #1) (Complaint) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This

action is one of more than one thousand (1,000) lawsuits filed in this district since September

2004 alleging that the overcrowded conditions in the Maricopa County jail system have

resulted in a variety of constitutional violations.1

Plaintiff has not paid a filing fee, but he has filed a certified "Application To Proceed

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 1 of 22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 2 -

In Forma Pauperis By A Prisoner Civil (Non-Habeas)" (Application To Proceed) and an

"Inmate Account Statement" (Account Statement) with his Complaint.

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND FILING FEE

Plaintiff’s certified Application To Proceed and Account Statement filed with the

Complaint make the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s

Application to Proceed will be granted. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is required to pay the two hundred and

fifty dollar ($250.00) statutory filing fee. Based on the average monthly deposits in

Plaintiff’s account for three (3) months preceding the filing of the Complaint, an initial

partial filing fee of sixty-eight cents ($0.68) will be assessed by this Order. 28 U.S.C. §

1915(b)(1).

By separate order, the Court will direct the appropriate agency to collect the initial

partial filing fee from Plaintiff’s trust account and forward it to the Clerk of the Court.

Thereafter, Plaintiff will be obligated for monthly payments of twenty percent (20%) of the

preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s trust account. These payments will be

forwarded by the appropriate agency to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in

Plaintiff’s account exceeds ten dollars ($10.00), until the filing fee is paid in full. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b)(2).

Plaintiff should take notice that if he is released before the filing fee is paid in full, he

must pay the remaining unpaid amount of the filing fee within one hundred and twenty (120)

days of the date of his release. If Plaintiff fails to pay the remainder of the filing fee within

one hundred and twenty (120) days of the date of his release, the action will be dismissed,

unless Plaintiff shows good cause, in writing, why he is unable to pay the remainder of the

filing fee.

Plaintiff also should take notice that a prisoner may not bring a civil action without

complete prepayment of the appropriate filing fee if the prisoner has brought, on three (3) or

more occasions, an action or appeal in a federal court that was dismissed as frivolous, as

malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 2 of 22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 3 -

is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

STATUTORY SCREENING OF PRISONER COMPLAINTS

The Court is required to screen complaints or amended complaints brought by

prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a

governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion

thereof if the Plaintiff has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant

who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). The Court also must dismiss

a complaint or portion thereof if Plaintiff fails to exhaust any administrative remedy available

to him. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts,

a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend the complaint before dismissal of the

action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court

is required to grant leave to amend "if a complaint can possibly be saved," but not if the

Complaint "lacks merit entirely." Id. at 1129. A court therefore should grant leave to amend

if the pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts, or if it appears at all possible

that the defect can be corrected. Id. at 1130.

The Court should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type

of advice "would undermine the district judges' role as impartial decisionmakers." Pliler v.

Ford, 124 S.Ct. 2441, 2446 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131, n.13 (declining to

decide whether court was required to inform litigant of deficiencies). Plaintiff's Complaint

will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend, because the Complaint

may possibly be saved by amendment.

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff alleges three (3) counts in his Complaint. (Complaint at 4-6).

Named as Defendants in the Complaint are: (1) Peterson, Jail Commander, Durango

Jail; and (2) Maricopa County. (Complaint at 1-2). 

Plaintiff seeks general and equitable relief, and compensatory and punitive monetary

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 3 of 22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 4 -

damages. (Complaint at 7).

In Count I of the Complaint, Plaintiff claims that his rights have been violated under

the guidelines established to protect the rights of pretrial detainees pertaining to clothing and

towels. (Complaint at 4). 

In Count II of the Complaint, Plaintiff claims that his rights have been violated under

the guidelines established in "Hart vs. MCSO/Hi1l" pertaining to medical and psychiatric

care. (Complaint at 5).

In Count III of the Complaint, Plaintiff claims that his rights have been violated under

the guidelines established in "Hard vs. MCSO-Hill" pertaining to staff member training and

screening. (Complaint at 6). 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS

Peterson and Maricopa County 

To state a viable constitutional claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiff must show an

affirmative link between the alleged injury and the conduct of an individual Defendant.

Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976)

 To state a claim against a state official, the civil rights complainant must allege that

the official personally participated in the constitutional deprivation, or that a state

supervisory official was aware of the widespread abuses and with deliberate indifference to

the inmate's constitutional rights failed to take action to prevent further misconduct. King

v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 568 (9th Cir. 1987); See also Monell v. New York City Department

of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978); Williams v. Cash, 836 F.2d 1318, 1320 (11th

Cir. 1988).

There is no liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on a theory of respondeat superior,

and therefore, a defendant’s position as the supervisor of persons who allegedly violated a

plaintiff’s constitutional rights does not impose liability. Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; West v.

Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 54 n.12 (1988); Ybarra v. Reno Thunderbird Mobile Home Village, 723

F.2d 675, 680-81 (9th Cir. 1984).

Although Plaintiff names Peterson and Maricopa County as Defendants, he has not

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 4 of 22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 5 -

made any allegations against either of them individually in the body of the Complaint.

Accordingly, they are not proper Defendants and are subject to dismissal without prejudice

from this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

In so doing, the Court notes that in order to bring a claim against Maricopa County,

Plaintiff must demonstrate the existence of a particular official municipal policy or

established custom and that the policy or custom caused him to be subjected to a deprivation

of a constitutional right. Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, 471 U.S. 808, 829-30 (1985) (Justice

Brennan, concurring); See also, Monell, 436 U.S. at 694; Ybarra, 723 F.2d at 681. Plaintiff

has not done so in the Complaint.

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

Constitutional Violation

In order to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiff must show that the conduct

of the Defendants deprived him of a constitutional right. Haygood v. Younger, 769 F.2d

1350, 1354 (9th Cir. 1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1020 (1986). Plaintiff has failed

to allege the violation of a constitutional right in any of his claims.

A pretrial detainee’s claim for unconstitutional conditions of confinement arises from

the Due Process Clause rather than from the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and

unusual punishment. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979). Nevertheless, the Eighth

Amendment provides a minimum standard of care for determining a plaintiff’s rights as a

pretrial detainee. Anderson v. Kern, 45 F.3d 1310, 1312-313 (9th Cir. 1995) (citing Redman

v. County of San Diego, 942 F.2d 1435, 1442 (9th Cir. 1991)). To prevail on an

unconstitutional conditions claim under an Eighth Amendment standard of care, a plaintiff,

whether a pretrial detainee or a convict, must show that defendants were “deliberately

indifferent” to the alleged constitutional violations. Redman, 942 F.2d at 1443; Wilson v.

Seiter, 501 U.S. 294, 302-03 (1991). 

 The specific inquiry with respect to pretrial detainees is whether the prison conditions

amount to “punishment” without due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 5 of 22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 6 -

Bell, 441 U.S. at 535. With regard to providing pretrial detainees with such basic necessities

as food, living space, and medical care the minimum standard allowed by the Due Process

Clause is the same as that allowed by the Eighth Amendment for convicted persons. Hamm

v. Dekalb County, 774 F.2d 1567, 1574 (9th Cir. 1985). To comply with the Eighth

Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, a prison must provide

prisoners with “adequate food, clothing, shelter, sanitation, medical care, and personal

safety.” Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1246 (9th Cir. 1982). However, this does not

mean that federal courts can or should interfere whenever prisoners are inconvenienced or

suffer de minimis injuries. See Bell, 441 U.S. at 539 n.21 (noting that a de minimis level of

imposition does not rise to a constitutional violation).

Similarly to state a § 1983 medical claim under the Eighth Amendment, Plaintiff must

show that Defendants acted with “deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs.”

Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976). Deliberate indifference may occur if “prison

officials deny, delay or intentionally interfere with medical treatment.” Hutchinson v. United

States, 838 F.2d 390, 394 (9th Cir. 1988). A mere delay in medical care, without more, is

insufficient to state a claim against prison officials for deliberate indifference. Shapley v.

Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir. 1985). Plaintiff must

show the delay in treatment was harmful. Id. 

To state a claim of deliberate indifference, a plaintiff must allege that a specific

defendant, despite his knowledge of a substantial risk of serious harm to the plaintiff, failed

to take reasonable measures to abate the harm. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994).

The alleged constitutional deprivation must be, “objectively, ‘sufficiently serious’” i.e., the

official’s act or omission must result in the denial of “the minimal civilized measure of life’s

necessities.” Id. at 834. Further, the prison official must have a “sufficiently culpable state

of mind,” i.e., he must act with deliberate indifference to inmate health or safety. Id.

Plaintiff has failed to allege in the Complaint that Defendants were deliberately

indifferent to his health or safety.

Hart v. Hill

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 6 of 22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 7 -

In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges generally that the guidelines established in "Hart

vs. MCSO/Hill" have been violated. The Court assumes that Plaintiff is referring to the class

action of Hart v. Hill, CV 77-0479-PHX-EHC (MS). 

With respect to any injunctive relief sought by Plaintiff in connection with the rights

enumerated in the Amended Judgment of Hart, that relief may only be sought or enforced

within the original case. The Amended Judgment precludes Plaintiff from seeking separate

and individual injunctive relief. 

With respect to any claim for monetary damages, Hart provides no independent cause

of action. Although the class action does not foreclose an individual complaint for damages,

see Hiser v. Franklin, 94 F.3d 1287 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 1106 (1997), Plaintiff

must demonstrate some right of action and legal entitlement to the monetary damages he

seeks. In a case challenging the conditions of confinement of pretrial detainees, the most

likely source of a right to sue (of which Plaintiff has availed himself in this action) is 42

U.S.C. § 1983. However, in order to state a claim under § 1983, Plaintiff must allege a

cognizable constitutional claim. As discussed above, Plaintiff has failed to allege a

constitutional violation.

DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519

(1972), conclusory and vague allegations will not support a cause of action. Ivey v. Board

of Regents of the University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266 (9th Cir. 1982); Rhodes v. Robinson,

612 F.2d 766, 772 (3d Cir. 1979). Further, a liberal interpretation of a civil rights complaint

may not supply essential elements of the claim that were not initially pled. Ivey, 673 F.2d

at 268. 

Because Plaintiff has failed to name a proper Defendant in his Complaint, has failed

to affirmatively link his alleged injuries with the conduct of any specific, named Defendant,

and has failed to allege a constitutional violation, the Complaint will be dismissed pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted. However, in keeping with "the rule favoring liberality in amendments

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 7 of 22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 8 -

to pleadings," the Court will exercise its discretion and allow Plaintiff to file an amended

complaint, if he so desires, to show what constitutional rights he has been deprived of, and

how the conduct of proper defendants deprived him of said rights. Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d

1446, 1448 (9th Cir. 1987). 

If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, he should take notice that an

amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258,

1262 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 915 (1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner &

Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the original pleading is treated

as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Thus, causes of action alleged in an original

complaint which are not alleged in an amended complaint are waived. King, 814 F.2d at

567. 

 Any amended complaint filed by Plaintiff must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety

on the current, Court-approved form included with this Order and may not incorporate any

part of the original Complaint by reference. See Rule 15.1(a)(2), Local Rule of Civil

Procedure (LRCiv). If Plaintiff cannot fit all of his supporting facts in favor of a particular

count on the Court-approved form, then he may continue on an attachment, but each matter

on any attachment must be clearly referenced to a particular count on the Court-approved

form, and be numbered appropriately. Plaintiff may only address one (1) issue in each count.

RULE 41(b) WARNING

Plaintiff is warned that if he fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order,

this action will be dismissed without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1260-61 (district

court may dismiss action for failure to comply with any order of the court), cert. denied, 506

U.S. 915 (1992). Moreover, because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state

a claim, if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified

in this Order, the dismissal of this action will count as a “strike” under the “three strikes”

provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 8 of 22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 9 -

(1) That Plaintiff's “Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By A Prisoner Civil

(Non-Habeas)” filed with the Complaint is GRANTED;

(2) That Plaintiff is OBLIGATED to pay the statutory filing fee of two hundred and

fifty dollars ($250.00) for this action. Plaintiff is ASSESSED an initial partial filing fee of

sixty-eight cents ($0.68). All fees shall be collected and paid in accordance with this Court’s

Order to the appropriate government agency filed concurrently herewith;

(3) That Plaintiff's "Civil Rights Complaint By A Prisoner" (Document #1)

(Complaint) is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM upon which relief

may be granted. Plaintiff SHALL HAVE thirty (30) days from the filing date of this Order

to file an amended complaint in order to state specific allegations of deprivation of

constitutional rights against proper defendant(s), to name as defendant(s) the individual(s)

who participated in the activities alleged in his amended complaint, to state what injury he

has suffered as a result of the activities of the defendant(s), and to show how, prior to filing

this action, he exhausted his administrative remedies as to each of his claims for relief. The

amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the current, Courtapproved form included with this Order, may not incorporate any part of the original

Complaint by reference, and must contain Plaintiff’s original signature. If Plaintiff fails to

file the amended complaint on a current, Court-approved form, the amended complaint will

be stricken, and the action dismissed without further notice to Plaintiff. Any amended

complaint submitted by Plaintiff should be clearly designated as an amended complaint on

the face of the document;

(4) That the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter a judgment of dismissal with

prejudice of this action, without further notice to Plaintiff, if Plaintiff fails to file an amended

complaint within thirty (30) days from the filing date of this Order. Upon entry of judgment,

the Clerk of the Court SHALL MAKE an entry on the docket in this matter indicating that

the dismissal of this action falls within the purview of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g);

(5) That a clear, legible copy of every pleading or other document filed SHALL

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 9 of 22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL-K - 10 -

ACCOMPANY each original pleading or other document filed with the Clerk for use by the

District Judge or Magistrate Judge to whom the case is assigned. See Rule 5.4, Local Rules

of Civil Procedure (LRCiv). Failure to submit a copy along with the original pleading

or document will result in the pleading or document being stricken without further

notice to Plaintiff;

(6) That at all times during the pendency of the instant action, Plaintiff SHALL

IMMEDIATELY ADVISE the Court and the United States Marshal of any change of address

and its effective date. Such notice shall be captioned “NOTICE OF CHANGE OF

ADDRESS.” The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the change of address

and its effective date, except that if Plaintiff has been released from custody, the notice

should so indicate. The notice shall not include any motions for any other relief. Failure to

file a NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS may result in the dismissal of the action for

failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); 

(7) That the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a current,

Court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

DATED this 17th day of March, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 10 of 22
Revised 2/7/05 1

INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR A

PRISONER FILING CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

I. General Information About the Civil Rights Complaint Form:

A. The Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help prisoners prepare a

complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. Local Rule of Civil Procedure

3.4(a) requires that prisoner civil rights complaints be filed on the court-approved form. Your

complaint must be typewritten or legibly handwritten. All information must be clearly and

concisely written, only in the space provided on the form. If needed, you may attach no more

than fifteen additional pages of standard letter size paper to continue any part of the complaint.

You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages.

B. Your Signature. You must sign the complaint. Your signature constitutes a certificate that:

1) you have read the complaint; 2) to the best of your knowledge, information and belief formed

after reasonable inquiry it is well grounded in fact and law; and 3) it is not being filed for any

improper purpose. Please review Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 11

provides for the imposition of sanctions if the complaint is signed in violation of the Rule. 

C. The Filing Fee. You must pay the $250.00 filing fee. If you are unable to pay the filing

fee when the complaint is filed, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please

review the "Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil

Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915" for more

information.

D. Court Divisions. If you resided in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila county when

your rights were allegedly violated, you should file your complaint in the Phoenix Division of

the court. If you resided in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai county when your

rights were allegedly violated, you should file your complaint in the Prescott Division of the

court. If you resided in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee county when your

rights were allegedly violated, you should file your complaint in the Tucson Division of the court.

See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). 

You should mail THE ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY of your complaint with the

$250.00 filing fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR Tucson Division:

U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. District Court Clerk

U.S. Courthouse, Suite 321 U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 11 of 22
2

401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 405 West Congress Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

E. Certificate of Service on Defendants. You must furnish the opposing party or their attorney

with a copy of any document you submit to the court (except the initial complaint and

application to proceed in forma pauperis). Pursuant to Rules 5(a) and (d) of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure, each original document (except the initial complaint and application for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the

document stating the date a copy of the document was mailed to the opposing party or their

attorney and the address to which it was mailed. Any document received by the court which

does not include a certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in

the following form:

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed

this day of (month) , (year) , to:

Name: 

Address: 

 Attorney for Defendant(s)/Respondent(s)

 

(Signature)

F. Original and Judge's Copy. You must furnish an original and one copy of any document

submitted to the court. You must furnish one additional copy to the clerk if you wish to have

a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the

original.

G. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint. Instead, the relevant

information should be paraphrased in the complaint. You should keep the exhibits to use to

support or oppose a motion for summary judgment or at trial.

H. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the clerk and the opposing party or their

attorney in writing of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the court of any

change in your mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.

I. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,

you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows

you to file one amended complaint prior to any defendant filing an answer. After any defendant

has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge a proposed amended

complaint. Local Rule of Civil Procedure 15.1(a)(2) prohibits any amended pleading from

referencing any prior pleading. Further, any allegations or defendants not included in the

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 12 of 22
3

amended complaint are considered dismissed.

J. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any of the District

Judges, Magistrates Judges, or the staff of any of the judicial officers. The appropriate way to

communicate with these persons is by filing a written pleading or motion. 

II. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form:

HEADING:

1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or jail inmate number, and mailing address on

the lines provided. 

2. Defendants. Print the names of each of your defendants. If you name more than

four defendants, you should print the name of one defendant and "see additional page

for defendants" in the space provided. On the additional page you must list the names

of all of the defendants. This additional page should be inserted after page 1 and

numbered as page "1-A" at the bottom of the page. The initial complaint must contain

the names of all of the parties (plaintiffs as well as defendants) in the heading (or on the

additional page if more than four defendants). See Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure.

3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write "JURY TRIAL DEMANDED"

on the line below "CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so

will result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are

seeking only injunctive relief.

Part A. JURISDICTION:

1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983 for state, county, or city defendants; "Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics

Agents" for federal defendants; or "other." If you mark "other," identify the source of

that authority. 

2. Plaintiff. Print all of the requested information on the spaces provided. Identify the

institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights occurred. 

3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in

the spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the

necessary information about each additional defendant on a separate page. Label the

page(s) as "2-A," "2-B," etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional

page(s) immediately behind page 2.

Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:

You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while

you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces

provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 13 of 22
4

information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as "2-A," "2-

B," etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page

2.

Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:

You must identify what rights the defendant(s) violated. The form provides space to

allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three

counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate

page. Number the additional pages "5-A", "5-B", etc., and insert them immediately behind

page 5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.

 

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. YOU MAY ALLEGE THE

VIOLATION OF ONLY ONE CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIM PER COUNT.

2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your

claim. YOU MAY CHECK ONLY ONE BOX PER COUNT. If you check the box

marked “Other,” you must identify the specific issue involved in the space provided.

3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you need

to state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each

individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you

need to identify which defendant did what act. You also need to state the date(s) on

which the act(s) occurred if possible.

4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.

5. Administrative Remedies. Exhaustion of administrative remedies is a prerequisite

to filing a civil rights complaint. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e requires prisoners to exhaust the

available administrative remedies before being allowed to file a civil rights action.

Consequently, you must disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance

procedures or administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If one of your

counts is exempt from the grievance procedures or administrative appeals, fully explain

the exemption on the lines provided.

Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:

Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. 

SIGNATURE:

You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Your signature

must be an original signature, not a photocopy. 

FINAL NOTE

You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your

complaint being stricken or dismissed by the court. All questions must be answered concisely

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 14 of 22
5

in the proper space on the form. If needed, you may attach no more than fifteen additional

pages. The form, however, must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach

additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and

number the pages.

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 15 of 22
Revised 2/7/05 1 550/555

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

)

 , )

(Full Name of Plaintiff) Plaintiff, )

)

 vs. ) CASE NO. 

) (To be supplied by the Clerk)

 , )

)

 , )

) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

 ,) BY A PRISONER

)

 , ) G Original Complaint

(Full Name of Each Defendant) Defendant(s). ) G First Amended Complaint

) G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION

1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:

a. G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3); 42 U.S.C. § 1983

b. G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

c. G Other: (Please specify.) .

2. Name of Plaintiff: .

Present mailing address: .

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

Institution/city where violation occurred: .

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 16 of 22
2

3. Name of first Defendant: . The first Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

The first Defendant is sued in his/her: G individual capacity G official capacity (check one or both).

Explain how the first Defendant was acting under color of law: 

.

4. Name of second Defendant: . The second Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

The second Defendant is sued in his/her: G individual capacity G official capacity (check one or both).

Explain how the second Defendant was acting under color of law: 

.

5. Name of third Defendant: . The third Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

The third Defendant is sued in his/her: G individual capacity G official capacity (check one or both).

Explain how the third Defendant was acting under color of law: 

.

6. Name of fourth Defendant: . The fourth Defendant is employed as:

at . (Position and Title) (Institution)

The fourth Defendant is sued in his/her: G individual capacity G official capacity (check one or both).

Explain how the fourth Defendant was acting under color of law: 

.

(If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.)

B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS

1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? G Yes G No

2. If your answer is "yes," how many lawsuits have you filed? . Describe the previous lawsuits in the

spaces provided below.

3. First prior lawsuit:

a. Parties to previous lawsuit:

Plaintiff: .

Defendants: 

.

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 17 of 22
3

b. Court: (If federal court, identify the district; if state court, identify the county.) 

.

c. Case or docket number: .

d. Claims raised: 

e. Disposition: (For example: Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) 

.

f. Approximate date lawsuit was filed: .

g. Approximate date of disposition: .

4. Second prior lawsuit:

a. Parties to previous lawsuit:

Plaintiff: .

Defendants: 

.

b. Court: (If federal court, identify the district; if state court, identify the county.) 

.

c. Case or docket number: .

d. Claims raised: 

.

e. Disposition: (For example: Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) 

.

f. Approximate date lawsuit was filed: .

g. Approximate date of disposition: .

5. Third prior lawsuit:

a. Parties to previous lawsuit:

Plaintiff: .

Defendants: 

.

b. Court: (If federal court, identify the district; if state court, identify the county.) 

.

c. Case or docket number: .

d. Claims raised: 

.

e. Disposition: (For example: Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) 

.

f. Approximate date lawsuit was filed: .

g. Approximate date of disposition: .

(If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.)

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 18 of 22
4

C. CAUSE OF ACTION

COUNT I

1. The following constitutional or other federal civil right has been violated by the Defendant(s): 

.

2. Count I involves: (Check only one; if your claim involves more than one issue, each issue should be stated

in a different count) G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts: (State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each

Defendant did or did not do to violate your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal

authority or arguments).

.

4. Injury: (State how you have been injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s)).

.

5. Administrative Remedies:

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at

your institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief to the highest level, briefly explain

why you did not. 

.

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 19 of 22
5

COUNT II

1. The following constitutional or other federal civil right has been violated by the Defendant(s): 

.

2. Count II involves: (Check only one; if your claim involves more than one issue, each issue should be stated

in a different count) G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts: (State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what

each Defendant did or did not do to violate your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing

legal authority or arguments).

.

4. Injury: (State how you have been injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s)).

.

5. Administrative Remedies:

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at

your institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief to the highest level, briefly explain

why you did not. 

.

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 20 of 22
6

COUNT III

1. The following constitutional or other federal civil right has been violated by the Defendant(s): 

.

2. Count III involves: (Check only one; if your claim involves more than one issue, each issue should be stated

in a different count) G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts: (State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what

each Defendant did or did not do to violate your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing

legal authority or arguments).

.

4. Injury: (State how you have been injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s)).

.

5. Administrative Remedies:

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at

your institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief to the highest level, briefly explain

why you did not. 

.

(If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.)

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 21 of 22
7

D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF

State briefly exactly what you want the Court to do for you.

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on 

DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or

other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES

All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If needed, you may attach no more

than fifteen additional pages. The form, however, must be completely filled in to the extent applicable.

Case 2:05-cv-02170-DGC--ECV Document 3 Filed 03/20/06 Page 22 of 22