Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05369/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05369-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALAMEIDA, 

Defendants.

 /

CV F 03 5369 OWW LJO P 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COURT

ORDER INSTRUCTING DEFENDANTS TO

RE-SERVE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION ON PLAINTIFF (Doc. 63.) 

 Eric Johnson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint

on September 22, 2003, and the Court found cognizable his claim against Defendant Alameida,

Jr. for violation of the Eighth Amendment based on an unconstitutional policy and practice 

regarding transgender inmates. 

On September 13, 2005, Plaintiff moved the Court to issue an Order requiring Defendants

to re-serve a Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff. Plaintiff states that Defendants

indicate in their Motion for an Extension of time that a Motion for Summary Judgment is

forthcoming but he has not yet received it. 

Case 1:03-cv-05369-OWW -LJO Document 66 Filed 09/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court has reviewed the Court Docket and to date, no Motion for Summary Judgment

has been filed with the Court. Thus, there is no Motion to serve on Plaintiff. At such time as a

Motion is filed with the Court, Defendants are required to and will likely serve the Motion on

Plaintiff. However, as no Motion has been filed, no service on Plaintiff is required. 

Accordingly, the Motion for Order Instruction Defendants to Re-serve Motion for

Summary Judgment on Plaintiff is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05369-OWW -LJO Document 66 Filed 09/15/05 Page 2 of 2