Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01218/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01218-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVERETT L. McCOY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-01-1218 DFL GGH P

vs.

CAL TERHUNE, et al.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On August 16, 2006, the court recommended that defendants’ September 7, 2005,

summary judgment motion be granted in part and denied in part. The court granted the parties

twenty days to file objections.

On September 1, 2006, defendants filed a request for a thirty day extension of

time to file objections. The grounds for this request are counsel’s large and active caseload and

the fact that the court recommended that much of defendants’ motion be denied.

While the court is sympathetic to counsel’s caseload, the court finds the request

not well supported. The issues in this action have been well briefed. Counsel’s large caseload,

standing alone, does not justify the request.

/////

/////

Case 2:01-cv-01218-JAM-GGH Document 129 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ September 1, 2006, request for extension of time to file objections

is denied;

2. Defendants’ objections to the August 16, 2006, findings and recommendations

are due on or before September 20, 2006.

DATED: 9/11/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

mc1218.eot(1)

Case 2:01-cv-01218-JAM-GGH Document 129 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2