Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-00964/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-00964-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

David Todd Steven, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV05-0964-PHX-SRB

ORDER

Plaintiff, David Todd Steven, filed his Civil Rights Complaint on March 30, 2005. 

On April 14, 2005 the Court issued a screen order advising Plaintiff that "at all times during

th pendency of this action, Plaintiff shall immediately advise the Court of any change of

address and its effective date." On November 21, 2005, the Court issued an order advising

Plaintiff that "Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of the Court

within 20 days of the date of filing of this Order." On November 30, 2005, the Post Office

returned the November 21, 2005 order with the notation "Inmate No Longer in Custody."

According to the Arizona Department of Corrections website Plaintiff was released from

custody on May 13, 2005. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed a change of

address with the Court.

The Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation on January 23, 2006,

recommending that Plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with

Rule 3.4, Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Court for the District

Case 2:05-cv-00964-SRB Document 11 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

of Arizona and Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court finds itself in

agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case for Plaintiff's for failure to comply

with Rule 3.4, Local Rule of Civil Procedure and Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DATED this 16th day of February, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-00964-SRB Document 11 Filed 02/21/06 Page 2 of 2