Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00982/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00982-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALAN HAMILTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. VIGLER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-CV-00982 AWI SMS P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT VIGLER’S

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT, TO

COMMENCE FOLLOWING SCREENING BY

COURT

(Doc. 1)

Plaintiff Alan Hamilton (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and California tort law. Defendant Vigler (“defendant”)

removed the action from Kings County Superior Court to this court on July 27, 2006. In conjunction

with his notice of removal, defendant moves for a thirty-day extension of time to respond to the

complaint, commencing once the complaint has been screened by the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A. 

Good cause having been found, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant’s request for an extension of time to respond to the complaint is

GRANTED; and

///

///

///

///

Case 1:06-cv-00982-LJO -SMS Document 3 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The court has a large number of cases pending before it and will screen the complaint in due course. 1

2

2. Defendant is relieved of his obligation to respond to the complaint until directed to

do so by the court, at which time defendant will be provided with thirty days to

respond.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 31, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00982-LJO -SMS Document 3 Filed 08/01/06 Page 2 of 2