Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00474/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00474-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ACTIVE 207510681v.1 [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DOROTHEA EMMONS and LISA 

STAPLETON, individually, and on behalf of 

other members of the general public similarly 

situated, and as aggrieved employees, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

QUEST DIAGNOSTICS CLINICAL 

LABORATORIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; QUEST DIAGNOSTICS 

INCORPORATED, doing business as QUEST 

DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED OF 

NEVADA, a Nevada corporation; QUEST 

DIAGNOSTICS NICHOLS INSTITUTE, a 

California corporations; DOES 1 through 10, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. Case No. 1:13-cv-00474-AWI-BAM

 

ORDER THEREON GRANTING 

STIPULATION REGARDING FURTHER 

PROCEEDINGS ON REMOVAL AND 

REMAND 

 

Case 1:13-cv-00474-DAD-BAM Document 59 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ACTIVE 207510681v.1 

ORDER 

In view of the parties’ stipulation, and good cause existing therefore, the Court hereby orders 

as follows: 

a) Defendants may file an amended notice of removal along with supplemental evidence 

supporting jurisdiction by June 30, 2015; 

b) If after evaluating Defendants amended notice Plaintiffs continue to challenge 

jurisdiction, they will file a motion for remand by July 21, 2015; 

c) Plaintiffs motion for remand, if filed, will proceed as a regular motion pursuant to 

Local Rule 230(c) and the Court’s scheduling calendar, with Defendants having the 

opportunity to submit an opposition to the motion and Plaintiffs having the 

opportunity to submit a reply in connection with the motion in accordance with the 

applicable rules and standards. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 11, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:13-cv-00474-DAD-BAM Document 59 Filed 05/11/15 Page 2 of 2