Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04391/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04391-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEJON MARQUIS HENDRIX,

Plaintiff,

v.

U.S. GOVERNMENT,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-04391-SK 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On September 21, 2016, mail sent from the Court to Plaintiff Dejon Marquis Hendrix was 

returned as undeliverable. (Dkt. 10.) Mail sent from the Court to Plaintiff was also returned as 

underliverable on October 19, October 28, November 22, and November 24, 2016. (Dkt. 19, 21, 

23, 24.) Plaintiff has not filed any notice of change of address. Civil Local Rule 3-11(a) requires 

that “a party proceeding pro se whose address changes while an action is pending must promptly 

file with the Court and serve upon all opposing parties a Notice of Change of Address specifying 

the new address.” Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) authorizes the Court to dismiss a complaint without

prejudice when “(1) Mail directed to the ... pro se party by the Court has been returned as not 

deliverable; and (2) The Court fails to receive within 60 days of this return a written 

communication from the ... pro se party indicating a current address.” More than sixty days have 

passed since mail sent to Plaintiff by the Court has been returned as undeliverable, and Plaintiff 

has failed to inform the Court of his current address. Therefore, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 3-

11(b), the Court HEREBY DISMISSES this action without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 1, 2016

______________________________________

SALLIE KIM

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cv-04391-SK Document 26 Filed 12/01/16 Page 1 of 1