Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506-64/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

SFI-564182v1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

C-99-2506-SI

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (#060359) 

ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com 

Caroline N. Mitchell (#143124) 

cnmitchell@jonesday.com 

Lara Kollios (#235395) 

lkollios@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY 

555 California Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1500 

Telephone: (415) 626-3939 

Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 

Attorneys for Defendants 

THERESA TRABER, ESQ. [S.B.#116305] 

tmt@tvlegal.com 

BERT VOORHEES, ESQ. [S.B. #137623] 

bv@tvlegal.com 

TRABER & VOORHEES 

128 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 204 

Pasadena, California 91103 

Telephone: (626) 585-9611 

Facsimile: (626) 577-7079 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LARRY BOWOTO, et. al. 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION, et 

al., 

Defendants.

Case No. C-99-2506-SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

ON THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFFS’ TERTIARY 

LIABILITY THEORIES

WHEREAS, the current deadline for defendants’ reply in support of Defendants’ Motion 

for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Tertiary Liability Theories is May 7, 2007; 

WHEREAS, defendants requested and plaintiffs agreed to extend the reply deadline by 

four days, to May 11, 2007; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 7-3(c), the 

current page-limit for defendants’ reply in support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment 

on Plaintiffs’ Tertiary Liability Theories is 15 pages; 

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1612 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1613 Filed 05/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SFI-564182v1

2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

C-99-2506-SI

WHEREAS, defendants requested and plaintiffs agreed to extend the reply page-limit by 5 

pages, to 20 pages; and 

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ 

Tertiary Liability Theories is set for June 8, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. 

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: 

1. Defendants shall file their reply in support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary 

Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Tertiary Liability Theories on or before May 11, 2007; and 

2. The page-limit for defendants’ reply in support of Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Tertiary Liability Theories is 20 pages. 

DATED: May 1, 2007 JONES DAY 

 By: /s/ Lara Kollios 

 Lara Kollios 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

DATED: May 1, 2007 LAW OFFICE OF TRABER & VOORHEES 

 By: /s/ Theresa M. Traber 

 Theresa M. Traber 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 

 JONES DAY 

 

 By: /s/ Lara Kollios 

 Lara Kollios 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May __, 2007 

 

 The Hon. Susan Illston 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1612 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1613 Filed 05/03/07 Page 2 of 2