Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00874/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00874-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BRYAN MAZZA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

L. AUSTIN, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-0874 AC P 

ORDER 

 This prisoner civil rights action, commenced by plaintiff proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, proceeds on the combined “Operative Complaint and Addendum.” See ECF No. 38. 

Service of process by the United States Marshal has been ordered for defendants Austin, 

Kuersten, Tan and Lipson, see ECF No. 34, and the court is awaiting additional information from 

plaintiff on the location of defendant McCue, see ECF No. 37. 

 Plaintiff has submitted additional documents, denominated copies of the complaint, see 

ECF No. 39, and filed a letter stating that the newly-filed documents “clean up the Exhibit Index 

Page Numbering, and the numbering of the pages themselves,” ECF No. 40. Review of these 

matters, in tandem with the Operative Complaint and Addendum, indicate that no changes are 

required to the operative documents. Plaintiff’s newly-filed List of Exhibits (page 2 only) is 

identical to that provided in the operative documents. See ECF No. 38 at 8 (page 1 of exhibit 

list), and 126 (page 2 of exhibit list). Moreover, neither the operative documents nor plaintiff’s 

Case 2:14-cv-00874-TLN-AC Document 41 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

newly-filed documents include copies of designated Exhibit Nos. 28-32; plaintiff’s exhibits end 

with Exhibit No. 27 (State Medical Board documentation re. Dr. Tan). Should plaintiff have 

possession of the remaining exhibits, he may submit copies to the court, properly designated, for 

inclusion in the operative documents. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s recently-filed documents, ECF 

No. 39-40, require no action by this court. Plaintiff is reminded that the court awaits his 

submission of information necessary to complete service of process on defendant McCue. 

DATED: November 17, 2015 

Case 2:14-cv-00874-TLN-AC Document 41 Filed 11/18/15 Page 2 of 2