Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

STIP . AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR 

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Case No. C04-03923 MMC

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) – griley@omm.com

MARK E. MILLER (S.B. #130200) – markmiller@omm.com

PETER OBSTLER (S.B. #171623) – pobstler@omm.com

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO (S.B. #208606) – ccatalano@omm.com

LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) – lsimmons@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street

San Francisco, California 94111-3305

Telephone: (415) 984-8700

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701

Attorneys for Defendant 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC., 

a Delaware Corporation, and LUKAS VAN 

GINNEKEN,

Defendants.

Case No. C04-03923 MMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE: SCHEDULE ON

PLAINTIFF SYNOPSYS, INC.’S 

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT TO DISMISS MAGMA’S 

COUNTERCLAIMS AND 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES UNDER 

ESTOPPEL BY CONTRACT

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 404 Filed 09/01/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

1

STIP . AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR 

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Case No. C04-03923 MMC

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and 

Defendant Magma Design Automation, Inc. (“Magma”) as follows:

WHEREAS, by Order dated August 12, 2005, the schedule on Synopsys’s Motion for 

Preliminary Injunction to Maintain the Status Quo to Preserve the Possibility of Equitable Relief 

(“Preliminary Injunction Motion”) and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Dismiss 

Magma’s Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses Under Estoppel by Contract (“Estoppel by 

Contract Motion”) (collectively, “Motions”) was reset such that Magma’s oppositions to the 

Motions would be due no later than September 2, 2005, Synopsys’s replies in support of the

Motions would be due no later than September 9, 2005, and the hearing on the Motions would 

scheduled for September 23, 2005 at 9:00 a.m.;

WHEREAS, by Clerk’s Notice dated August 15, 2005, all motions previously scheduled

for hearing on September 23, 2005 were continued to October 14, 2005 at 9:00 a.m.;

WHEREAS, on August 29, 2005, the Court ordered a new briefing and hearing schedule

on Synopsys’s Preliminary Injunction Motion under which Synopsys’s revised opening papers

would be due September 16, 2005, Magma’s opposition would be due September 30, 2005, 

Synopsys’s reply would be due October 14, 2005 and the hearing would occur on October 28, 

2005;

WHEREAS, the parties wish to conform the schedule on the Estoppel by Contract Motion

with the schedule on the Preliminary Injunction Motion;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties hereby stipulate as 

follows:

Magma shall file and serve any opposition to the Estoppel by Contract Motion on or 

before September 30, 2005;

Synopsys shall file and serve any reply in support of the Estoppel by Contract Motion on 

or before October 14, 2005;

The hearing on the Estoppel by Contract Motion is scheduled for October 28, 2005 at 9:00 

a.m.;

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 404 Filed 09/01/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIP . AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR 

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Case No. C04-03923 MMC

The parties agree to meet and confer in good faith with respect to the briefing schedule for 

any additional motions noticed for hearing on October 28, 2005.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: August 31, 2005

GEORGE A. RILEY

MARK E. MILLER

PETER OBSTLER

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO

LUANN L. SIMMONS

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Christopher D. Catalano

 Christopher D. Catalano

Attorneys for Defendant

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.

Dated: August 31, 2005

CHRIS SCOTT GRAHAM

MICHAEL N. EDELMAN

DECHERT LLP

By: /s/ Michael Edelman

Michael Edelman

Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC.

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from Michael Edelman.

Dated: August 31, 2005

GEORGE A. RILEY

MARK E. MILLER

PETER OBSTLER

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO

LUANN L. SIMMONS

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Christopher D. Catalano

Christopher D. Catalano

Attorneys for Defendant

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 404 Filed 09/01/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIP . AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR 

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Case No. C04-03923 MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

United States District Judge

SF1:599681.1

September 1, 2005

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 404 Filed 09/01/05 Page 4 of 4