Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00516/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00516-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHS West:260964418.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CHANGING TIME

CASE NO. CV 10-00516 MHP

PETER M. HART (STATE BAR NO. 198691)

hartpeter@msn.com

KIMBERLY WESTMORELAND (STATE BAR NO. 237919)

LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART

13592 Bora Bora Way, F-320

Marina Del Rey, CA 90292

Telephone: +1-310-478-5789

Facsimile: +1-509-561-6441

KENNETH H. YOON (STATE BAR NO. 198443)

kyoon@yoon-law.com

LINDA WHITEHEAD (STATE BAR NO. 222799)

MELISSA COYLE (STATE BAR NO. 232775)

LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH H. YOON

One Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200

Los Angeles, CA 90017

Telephone: +1-213-612-0988

Facsimile: +1-213-947-1211

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ANTHONY VILLA

Attorneys for Defendant on next page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY VILLA, as an individual and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a 

corporation; and DOES 1 through 50 

inclusive, 

Defendants.

Case No. CV 10-00516 MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CHANGING HEARING DATE 

AND TIME TO FILE MOTIONS, 

OPPOSITIONS/DISCOVERY 

STATEMENTS, AND REPLIES 

* As amended by Court

Case 3:10-cv-00516-MHP Document 24 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CHANGING TIME

CASE NO. CV 10-00516 MHP

OHS WEST:260964418.1

PATRICIA K. GILLETTE (STATE BAR NO. 74461)

pgillette@orrick.com

ANDREW R. LIVINGSTON (STATE BAR NO. 148646)

alivingston@orrick.com

AMIRA B. DAY (STATE BAR NO. 239045)

aday@orrick.com

LENA P. RYAN (STATE BAR NO. 258782)

lenaryan@orrick.com

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

The Orrick Building

405 Howard Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-2669

Telephone: +1-415-773-5700

Facsimile: +1-415-773-5759

Attorneys for Defendant

TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, plaintiff Anthony Villa (“Plaintiff”) and 

defendant Tyco Electronics Corporation, (“Defendant”), hereby request that the Court grant the 

parties an extension of the deadlines to file motions, oppositions/discovery statements, and replies 

as outlined below. In support of this request, the parties represent and stipulate as follows:

1. On May 17, 2010, following the case management conference, the Court 

issued a scheduling order setting July 19, 2010 as the deadline to file motions; August 2, 2010 as 

the deadline to file oppositions/discovery statements; August 9, 2010 as the deadline to file 

replies; and August 23, 2010 as the hearing date for motions. 

2. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, on July 1, 2010, the Court extended 

these deadlines, setting August 13, 2010 as the deadline to file motions; August 27, 2010 as the 

deadline to file oppositions/discovery statements; September 3, 2010 as the deadline to file 

replies; and September 20, 2010 as the hearing date for motions.

3. Defendant took Plaintiff’s deposition on June 17, 2010, which was the 

earliest date available for the parties following the case management conference. 

4. At the deposition, Defendant learned of certain documents responsive to its 

requests for production of documents, including telephone records and bank/credit card 

statements. Defendant believes that obtaining these documents is necessary before it can file its 

motion for summary judgment. Since July 1, 2010, the parties have met and conferred regarding 

Case 3:10-cv-00516-MHP Document 24 Filed 08/09/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CHANGING TIME

CASE NO. CV 10-00516 MHP

this issue and Plaintiff has agreed to provide these documents subject to objections and redaction 

for private information, but needs additional time to do so.

5. Extending the current deadlines as outlined below will allow Plaintiff 

sufficient time to provide the requested documents to Defendant, and for Defendant to consider 

these documents in preparing its motion for summary judgment. It will also allow sufficient time 

for Plaintiff to oppose Defendant’s motion or file a discovery statement, and for Defendant to 

reply to Plaintiff’s opposition prior to the hearing on the motion.

 Motions to be filed: September 17, 2010.

 Opposition/Discovery Statement to be filed: October 1, 2010.

 Reply to be filed: October 8, 2010

 Hearing: October 15, or as soon thereafter as the Court prefers.

For the reasons stated above, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant their 

request to extend the current deadlines to the dates outlined in Paragraph 5 above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: August 5, 2010

__/s/_________

KIMBERLY WESTMORELAND 

LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ANTHONY VILLA

Dated: August 5, 2010

_/s/__________

AMIRA B. DAY

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

I hereby attest that the content of this document is acceptable to all persons whose 

signatures are indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

Dated: August 5, 2010

/s/

AMIRA B. DAY

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

Attorneys for Defendant TYCO ELECTRONICS 

CORPORATION

Case 3:10-cv-00516-MHP Document 24 Filed 08/09/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CHANGING TIME

CASE NO. CV 10-00516 MHP

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the hearing date and deadlines to file motions, 

oppositions/discovery statements, and replies shall be extended as follows:

 Motions to be filed: September 17, 2010.

 Opposition/Discovery Statement to be filed: October 1, 2010.

 Reply to be filed: October 8, 2010

 Hearing: ___________________.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August ___, 2010

Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel

United States District Judge

10/25/2010 at 2:00 p.m. 6

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:10-cv-00516-MHP Document 24 Filed 08/09/10 Page 4 of 4