Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-87-01766/USCOURTS-ca10-87-01766-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

FIL.ED 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

Uniced Sraus Coun of Appeals 

Tenth Clraut 

FEB 2 3 1988 

MILTON S. HALL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v . 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO; 

BERRY COX; RANDY BOLGLIN; TOM FRIEDEL; 

CLIFF HOLT; KAREN GLASER, Dean of 

Students; SHIAME O'KUNOR, 

Dean of General College on Afro 

Studies Div.; KELLY DAVIS; 

PETE ROMERO; GAIL WOODBERRY; 

CAROLYN WOODBERRY; RUBEN PORTER; 

RODNEY BOWE; JUBA CLAYTON; 

KEITH CARODINE, Assistant . 

Coach - Mens Basketball; 

RICHARD DOCKERY; 

JEANETTE BOHANAN; GARY WALKER, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 87-1766 

(D.C. No. 87-324C) 

(D. N.M.) 

Before MOORE and TACHA, Circuit Judges, and BRIMMER, Chief Judge.* 

*Honorable Clarence A. 

District Court for 

designation. 

Brimmer, Chief Judge, United States 

the District of Wyoming, sitting by 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

Appellate Case: 87-1766 Document: 010110027521 Date Filed: 02/23/1988 Page: 1 
34(a): 10th Cir. R. 34.1.8. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The cause is therefore ordered 

Milton S. Hall (Hall), proceeding pro se, commenced this 

action seeking redress for the alleged violations of his 

constitutional, common law, and civil rights by employees of the 

University of New Mexico and the Albuquerque Police Department. 

On April 22, 1987, Hall filed a motion for a temporary restraining 

order, seeking to restrain all parties from violating Hall's 

federal rights, and to restrain the Albuquerque Police Department 

from harassing, following, and arresting Hall. The district court 

denied the temporary restraining order, ruling that such an order 

would be adverse to the public interest. Hall appeals from the 

order denying the motion for a temporary restraining order. The 

defendants have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. 

Because an order granting or denying a temporary restraining 

order is not appealable, we grant the motion to dismiss this 

appeal. In re Arthur Treacher's Franchise Litigation, 689 F.2d 

1150, 1153 (3d Cir. 1982). 

The appeal from the order of the United States District Court 

for the District of New Mexico denying the motion for a temporary 

restraining order is DISMISSED. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 87-1766 Document: 010110027521 Date Filed: 02/23/1988 Page: 2