Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00359/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00359-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Answer

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Merced County Counsel

2222 M Street

Merced, CA 95340

(209) 385-7564

James N. Fincher, SBN 196837

Merced County Counsel

Roger S. Matzkind, SBN 77331

Chief Civil Litigator

2222 M Street, Room 309

Merced, CA 95340

Tel: (209) 385-7564

Fax: (209) 726-1337

Attorney for Defendant County of Merced

In the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of California, Sacramento

Noel Lemus, Adolfo Lemus,

Plaintiffs,

v.

County of Merced, Merced County 

Sheriff's Department, Paul Barile; and 

Does 1-50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00359-MCE-EPG

Stipulation and Order Extending 

Time to Answer 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, by and through their 

respective counsel, that the time to answer the second amended complaint is 

extended an additional thirty day (30) days to and including August 1, 2016, in 

order for plaintiffs and defendant County of Merced to evaluate and determine

the propriety or necessity of a motion or stipulation to stay the action in the 

district court against County of Merced pending the outcome of the appeal filed 

by Defendant Barile.

///

///

Case 1:15-cv-00359-MCE-EPG Document 43 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Answer

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Merced County Counsel

2222 M Street

Merced, CA 95340

(209) 385-7564

Dated: June 28, 2016 JACHIMOWICZ, POINTER & EMANUEL

By: /s/ Joel P. Waelty (as authorized 6/28/16)

JOEL P. WAELTY

Attorney for Plaintiffs

ADOLFO LEMUS and NOEL LEMUS

Dated: June 28, 2016 James N. Fincher

Merced County Counsel

By: /s/ Roger S. Matzkind

Roger S. Matzkind

Chief Civil Litigator

Attorneys for Defendant

County of Merced

 

ORDER 

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that the time 

to answer the second amended complaint is extended an additional thirty day 

(30) days to and including August 1, 2016, in order for plaintiffs and defendant 

County of Merced to evaluate and determine the propriety or necessity of a 

motion or stipulation to stay the action in the district court against County of 

Merced pending the outcome of the appeal filed by Defendant Barile.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 29, 2016

Case 1:15-cv-00359-MCE-EPG Document 43 Filed 06/30/16 Page 2 of 2