Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00747/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00747-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMISI J. CALLOWAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

DR. AKANNO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-00747-SAB-PC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT 

ORDER

(ECF No. 35)

Plaintiff Jamisi J. Calloway is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF No. 10.)

On November 7, 2016, the Court screened and dismissed Plaintiff’s third amended 

complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff 

was directed to file a fourth amended complaint within thirty days from the date of service of 

that order. (Id. at 13) 

On December 7, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 

36.) That motion was denied, and the Court reminded Plaintiff that his most recent amended 

complaint was dismissed for the failure to state any claim upon which relief could be granted, 

with leave to amend. (Id. at 2.)

Case 1:13-cv-00747-LJO-SAB Document 38 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint was due on or before December 12, 2016. Nearly 

two months have passed since that deadline, and Plaintiff has not filed a fourth amended 

complaint. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief 

may be granted. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall either:

a. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of this order, show cause 

in writing as to why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the 

November 7, 2016 order; or

b. Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, shall file a 

Third Amended Complaint in compliance with the Court’s November 7, 2016 screening order; 

and

2. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in 

dismissal of this action for failure to comply with a court order and failure to state a cognizable 

claim upon which relief may be granted. 

No further extensions will be granted to file an amended complaint or response to this 

order absent good cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 1, 2017 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00747-LJO-SAB Document 38 Filed 02/02/17 Page 2 of 2