Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-03633/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-03633-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

PATRICK K. FAULKNER

COUNTY COUNSEL

JACK F. GOVI

ASSISTANT COUNTY COUNSEL

DOROTHY R. JONES

CHIEF DEPUTY

COUNTY COUNSEL OF MARIN COUNTY

3501 Civic Center Drive, Suite 275

San Rafael, California 94903-5222

(415) 499-6117

FAX (415) 499-3796

TDD (415) 473-2226

MARI-ANN G. RIVERS

RENEE GIACOMINI BREWER

DAVID L. ZALTSMAN

MICHELE KENO

NANCY STUART GRISHAM

JENNIFER M. W. VUILLERMET

PATRICK M. K. RICHARDSON

THOMAS F. LYONS

STEPHEN R. RAAB

STEVEN M. PERL

SHEILA SHAH LICHTBLAU

EDWARD J. KIERNAN

JESSICA F. MILLS

DEPUTIES

JEANINE MICHAELS

ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT

April 2, 2010

Via Electronic Filing and Copy to Judge James’s Chambers

The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

1301 Clay Street, 400S

Third Floor, Courtroom 3

Oakland, CA 94612

Re: Cozzi v. County of Marin, C 08 3633 PJH

Letter seeking guidance regarding pretrial submissions

Dear Honorable Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton:

This letter is a joint submission from counsel for all parties in the action. The trial

regarding plaintiff Martha Grigsby is scheduled to begin on June 7, 2010. On April 13,

the joint pretrial statement, trial briefs, motions in limine, deposition excerpts, witness

lists and exhibits to be offered as evidence of the parties are due. On February 10,

2010, a hearing took place regarding the summary judgment motion of all defendants

against Martha Grigsby.

The parties have conducted the ordered meet and confer prior to the pretrial

conference, and agree that the Court’s ruling on the summary judgment may have a

significant impact upon all pretrial submissions. Therefore, the parties request that the

Court reschedule the date the pretrial submissions are due from April 13 to April 23.

The parties stipulate that the time to oppose and motions in limine would not change

from the pretrial order, in which oppositions to any motions in limine were due April 28,

2010. Therefore, the parties would not change the date that the last submission of the

parties was due before the pretrial conference.

If the April 23 date for the parties’ pretrial submissions is not acceptable to the

Court, the parties request guidance from the Court regarding an appropriate date for the

pretrial submissions to allow the parties more time to prepare, and also for the potential

to receive an order regarding the summary judgment motion involving Martha Grigsby.

Case 4:08-cv-03633-PJH Document 126 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 2
Page 2

Sincerely,

/s/

Stephen R. Raab

Attorneys for Defendants

Sincerely,

/s/

David M. Poore

Attorney for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

4/5/10

Case 4:08-cv-03633-PJH Document 126 Filed 04/05/10 Page 2 of 2