Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04347/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04347-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

Counsel on next page 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD CASTLE and JONATHAN 

SHAVER, on behalf of themselves and 

classes of those similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC. d/b/a 

WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL AND WELLS 

FARGO FINANCIAL ACCEPTANCE, and 

DOES 1-50, 

Defendants. 

 Case No. C064347 SI 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 

ORDER 

Judge: Hon. Susan Illston 

Date Action Filed: July 17, 2006 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 1 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 1 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

PETER RUKIN (STATE BAR NO. 178336) 

JOHN HYLAND (STATE BAR NO. 178875) 

RUKIN HYLAND & DORIA LLP 

100 Pine Street, Suite 725 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-1800 

Facsimile: (415) 421-1700 

DONALD H. NICHOLS (MN State Bar No. 78918) 

(Admitted pro hac vice) 

PAUL J. LUKAS (MN State Bar No. 22084X) 

(Admitted pro hac vice) 

RACHHANA T. SREY (MN State Bar No. 3401433) 

(Admitted pro hac vice) 

NICHOLS KASTER & ANDERSON, PLLP 

4600 IDS Center 

80 South Eighth Street 

Minneapolis, MN 55402 

Telephone: (612) 256-3200 

Facsimile: (612) 215-6870 

Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs 

JOAN B. TUCKER FIFE (SBN:144572) 

email: jfife@winston.com 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

101 California Street, Suite 300 

San Francisco, CA 941 11 

Telephone: 415-591-1000 

Facsimile: 415-591-1400 

JESSIE A. KOHLER (SBN: 179363) 

email: jkohler@winston.com 

ERIC E: SUITS (SBN: 232762) 

email: esuits@winston com 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles. CA 90071-1543 

Telephone: (213) 615-1700 

Facsimile: (213) 615-1750 

Attorneys for Defendant 

WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC. 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 2 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 2 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production 

of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be 

warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the 

following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not 

confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection 

it affords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable 

legal principles to treatment as confidential. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in 

Section 10, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order creates no entitlement to file 

confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must 

be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from 

the court to file material under seal. The parties further acknowledge that nothing in this 

Stipulated Protective Order shall preclude either party from asserting that a document is of 

such a confidential or private nature that it should not be produced or that it should only be 

produced in redacted form, or from seeking a protective order to preclude the production of 

certain documents. 

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 

employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff). 

2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 

the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 

testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or 

responses to discovery in this matter. 

2.3 “Confidential” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under standards 

developed under F. R. Civ. P. 26(c). 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 3 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 3 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

2.4 “Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or Items: 

extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” whose disclosure to another Party or 

nonparty would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less 

restrictive means. 

2.5 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 

from a Producing Party. 

2.6 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or 

Discovery Material in this action. 

2.7 Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or 

items that it produced in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

2.8 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 

designated as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

2.9 Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are 

retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 

2.10 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. 

2.11 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well 

as their support staffs). 

2.12 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 

pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert 

witness or as a consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or 

of a competitor of a Party’s and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an 

employee of a Party or a competitor of a Party’s. This definition includes a professional, jury or 

trial consultant retained in connection with this litigation. 

2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 

services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 4 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 4 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and 

subcontractors. 

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 

Protected Material (as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, 

as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, 

conversations, or presentations by parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that 

might reveal Protected Material. 

4. DURATION

Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed 

by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a 

court order otherwise directs. 

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 

Each Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must 

take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate 

standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of 

material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify - so that other 

portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted 

are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations 

that are shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose unnecessary 

expenses and burdens on other parties), expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 

If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items that 

it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 5 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 5 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 4 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

of protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is 

withdrawing or modifying the mistaken designation. 

5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this 

Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or 

ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated 

before the material is disclosed or produced. 

Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 

(a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of 

depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” at the 

bottom-right of each page that contains protected material. 

A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for 

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated 

which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the 

designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the 

documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, 

or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, then, before producing the specified 

documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL,” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) at the bottom-right of each page 

that contains Protected Material. 

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial 

proceedings, that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the 

record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, 

and further specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” When it is unpractical to identify separately each portion of 

testimony that is entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 6 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 6 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 5 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

testimony may qualify for protection, the Party or non-party that sponsors, offers, or gives the 

testimony may invoke on the record (before the deposition or proceeding is concluded) a right to 

have up to 20 days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is 

sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). Only those portions of the testimony that 

are appropriately designated for protection within the 20 days shall be covered by the provisions 

of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by the 

court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend “CONFIDENTIAL,” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL. - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as instructed by the Party or 

nonparty offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony. 

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, 

and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the 

exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only 

portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent 

practicable, shall identify the protected portions, specifying whether they qualify as 

“Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent 

failure to designate qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential - 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure 

protection under this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only” after the material was initially 

produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable 

efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 7 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 7 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 6 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

6.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s 

confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary 

economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive 

its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly 

after the original designation is disclosed. 

6.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a 

Designating Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the 

process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not 

sufficient) with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party must 

explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give 

the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the 

circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen 

designation. A challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if 

it has engaged in this meet and confer process first. 

6.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a 

confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party 

may file and serve a motion under Civil Local Rule 7 (and hi compliance with Civil Local 

Rule 79-5, if applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the 

basis for the challenge. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration 

that affirms that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed inn 

the preceding paragraph and that sets forth with specificity the justification for the 

confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating Party in the meet and confer 

dialogue. 

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the 

Designating Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 8 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 8 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 7 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing 

Party’s designation. 

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 

disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for 

prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be 

disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. 

When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of 

section 11, below (FINAL DISPOSITION). 

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 

location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized 

under this Order. 

7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 

otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving 

Party may disclose any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to: 

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, 

House Counsel and said Counsel’s paralegals, as well as other employees of said Counsel to 

whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and who have 

signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

(b) the officers, directors, and employees of the Receiving Party to 

whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement 

to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

(c) experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

(d) the Court and its personnel; 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 9 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 9 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 8 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

(e) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to 

depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and 

may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order. 

(g) the author of the document or the original source of the 

information. 

7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by 

the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL -ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 

(a) ’the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, House Counsel and said 

Counsel’s paralegals, as well as other employees of Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary 

to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound 

by Protective Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

(b) Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

(c) the Court and its personnel; 

(d) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and 

(e) the author of the document or the original source of the 

information. 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 10 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 10 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 9 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN 

OTHER LITIGATION. 

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other 

litigation that would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action 

as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL. - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the 

Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) immediately 

and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such 

notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order. 

The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who caused 

the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by 

the subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party 

must deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the Party in the other 

action that caused the subpoena or order to issue. 

The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the 

existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an 

opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena 

or order issued. The Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking 

protection in that court of its confidential material - and nothing in these provisions should be 

construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful 

directive from another court. 

9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 

Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated 

Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating 

Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the 

Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whole unauthorized disclosures were 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 11 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 11 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 10 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the 

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

10. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL. Without written permission from the 

Designating Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a 

Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that 

seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. 

11. FINAL DISPOSITION. Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the 

Producing Party, within sixty days after the final termination of this action, each Receiving 

Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, 

“all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other 

form of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. With permission in writing 

from the Designating Party, the Receiving Party may destroy some or all of the Protected 

Material instead of returning it. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the 

Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the 

same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty day deadline that identifies (by 

category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that 

affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or 

other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this 

provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, 

transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if such materials 

contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material 

remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION), above. 

12. MISCELLANEOUS

12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 

person to seek its modification by the Court in the fixture. 

12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 

Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 12 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 12 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 11 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. 

Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the 

material covered by this Protective Order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: January 17, 2007 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

JOAN B. TUCKER FIFE 

JENNIFER W. GARBER 

JESSIE A. KOHLER 

ERIC E. SUITS 

By: /s/ 

 Joan B. Tucker Fife 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC. 

Dated: January 17, 2007 NICHOLS KASTER & ANDERSON, LLP 

DONALD H. NICHOLS 

PAUL LUKAS 

RACHHANA SREY 

BRYAN SCHWARTZ 

By: /s/ 

 Bryan Schwartz 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 RICHARD CASTLE, et al. 

ORDER

 It is hereby ORDERED that this Protective Order is entered in this case in accordance 

with the above Stipulation of the parties. 

Dated: ____________, 2007 

The Honorable Susan Illston 

United States District Court, Northern District of 

California 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 13 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 13 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 12 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - C064347 SI

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE

I, Joan B. Tucker Fife, declare under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from Bryan Schwartz, attorney for Plaintiffs. 

Dated: January 17, 2007 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

JOAN B. TUCKER FIFE 

JENNIFER W. GARBER 

JESSIE A. KOHLER 

ERIC E. SUITS 

By: /s/ 

 Joan B. Tucker Fife 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC. 

Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 59-1 Filed 01/17/2007 Page 14 of 14
 Case 3:06-cv-04347-SI Document 60 Filed 01/18/07 Page 14 of 14