Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03230/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03230-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES FOR DECLARATION STATING ALL

RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN PRODUCED

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. CV 13-03230 EDL

4825-0746-2700v2 

EKENNEDY\15321004 

CHRISTINE H. LONG, CA STATE BAR NO. 199676 

EILEEN P. KENNEDY, CA STATE BAR NO. 204646 

BERLINER COHEN, LLP

TEN ALMADEN BOULEVARD

ELEVENTH FLOOR

SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95113-2233 

TELEPHONE: (408) 286-5800 

FACSIMILE: (408) 998-5388 

christine.long@berliner.com 

eileen.kennedy@berliner.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS BOBBY A. ALI; RICK 

ALI1; M1 COLLISION CARE CENTERS, INC.

2

; AUTOVEST 

COLLISION REPAIRS, INC., DBA AUTOWEST COLLISION 

REPAIRS, INC.; AND AW COLLISION OF SERRAMONTE3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

RAFAEL SANDOVAL, LUIS MARTIN 

CALIXTO, and ADRIAN RAMIREZ on 

behalf of themselves, on behalf of all others 

similarly situated and in the interest of the 

general public, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

BOBBY A. ALI; RICK ALI, M1 AUTO 

COLLISIONS CENTERS, INC.; M1 

COLLISION CARE CENTERS, INC.; 

AUTOVEST COLLISION REPAIRS, INC. 

aka AUTOWEST COLLISION REPAIRS, 

INC.; and SERRAMONTE AUTO PLAZA 

BODY SHOP, INC., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. CV 13-03230 EDL 

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER 

ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES FOR 

DECLARATION STATING ALL 

RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN 

PRODUCED 

Date: January 5, 2016 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Dept.: Courtroom E, 15th Fl. 

 450 Golden Gate Avenue 

 San Francisco, CA 94102 

Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

On January 5, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., Christine Long and Eileen Kennedy, Berliner Cohen LLP, 

appeared on behalf of Defendants Bobby A. Ali, Rick Ali, M1 Collision Care Centers, Inc., Autovest 

 

1

 Defendants Bobby Ali and Rick Ali were dismissed with prejudice in part by the Court’s Order of 7/10/2014. 

2

 Erroneously sued as “M1 Auto Collisions Centers, Inc.” 

3

 Erroneously sued as “Serramonte Auto Plaza Body Shop, Inc.” 

 _________

Case 3:13-cv-03230-EDL Document 186 Filed 01/22/16 Page 1 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES FOR DECLARATION STATING ALL

RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN PRODUCED

-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. CV 13-03230 EDL

4825-0746-2700v2 

EKENNEDY\15321004 

Collision Repairs, Inc., dba Autowest Collision Repairs, Inc., and AW Collision of Serramonte 

(collectively “Defendants”) and Tomas Margain of Justice at Work Law Group and Marco Palau of 

Mallison & Martinez appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs and Class on Defendants’ Motion to Compel 

Further Responses and Production of Documents and Sanctions, which came on for hearing before 

the Hon. Elizabeth LaPorte in Courtroom E, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, San 

Francisco, California. 

Good cause having been found therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants’ 

Motion to Compel Further Responses and Production of Documents and Sanctions under Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 37, 26, 33, and 34, and Civil Local Rules 37-2 and 37-4 is 

GRANTED, in part, as follows: 

1. Plaintiffs Raphael Sandoval and Luis Martin Calixto shall each provide a declaration 

that all responsive documents have been produced or if all documents have not produced, Plaintiffs 

shall produce documents in response to the following requests: 

i) Defendants’ Request for Production of Documents—Set Two, to Rafael Sandoval; 

ii) Defendant M-1 Collision Care Centers, Inc.’s Request for Production—Set Three, Luis 

Martin Calixto, Nos. 1-9 

iii) Defendant M-1 Collision Care Centers, Inc.’s Request for Production—Set Three, to 

Raphael Sandoval, Nos. 1-9. 

Plaintiffs shall serve the declarations or produce any documents responsive to this request no 

later than thirty days after this Order. 

2. Plaintiffs shall provide further responses to the following Special Interrogatories, 

specifically to include their theories of recovery for each claim in the Special Interrogatory and the 

manner in which they intend to calculate their damages (the legal theory of how to calculate their 

damages) for each claim in the Special Interrogatory. 

(a) Luis Martin Calixto’s Response to Defendant M-1 Collision Care Centers, Inc.’s Special 

Interrogatories—Set Three, Nos. 17-18 (FLSA Class); 21-22 (damages for each 

individual claim asserted in the Second Amended Complaint) 

Case 3:13-cv-03230-EDL Document 186 Filed 01/22/16 Page 2 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES FOR DECLARATION STATING ALL

RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN PRODUCED

-3- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. CV 13-03230 EDL

4825-0746-2700v2 

EKENNEDY\15321004 

(b) Luis Martin Calixto’s Response to Defendant MB Bodyshop of San Francisco’s Special 

Interrogatories—Set Three, Nos. 17-18 (Wage Statement Class); 21-22 (Rest Period 

Class) 

(c) Rafael Sandoval’s Response to Defendant M-1 Collision Care Centers, Inc.’s Special 

Interrogatories—Set Three, Nos. 17-18 (FLSA Class); 21-22 (damages for each 

individual claim asserted in the Second Amended Complaint). 

(d) Rafael Sandoval’s Response to Defendant MB Bodyshop of San Francisco’s Special 

Interrogatories—Set Three, Nos. 17-18 (Wage Statement Class); 21-22 (Rest Period 

Class) 

(e) Jaime Barrios’ Response to Defendant M-1 Collision Care Centers, Inc.’s Special 

Interrogatories—Set Two, No. 25 (FLSA Individual) 

(f) Salvador Flores’ Response to Defendant M-1 Collision Care Centers, Inc.’s Special 

Interrogatories—Set Two, No. 25 (FLSA Individual) 

(g) Francisco Javier Lopez Jr.’s Response to Defendant M-1 Collision Care Centers, Inc.’s 

Special Interrogatories—Set Two, No. 25 (FLSA Individual) 

(h) Manuel Llamas’ Response to Defendant M-1 Collision Care Centers, Inc.’s Special 

Interrogatories—Set Two, No. 25 (FLSA Individual) 

(i) Francisco Javier Lopez’s Response to Defendant M-1 Collision Care Centers, Inc.’s 

Special Interrogatories—Set Two, No. 25 (FLSA Individual) 

(j) Eddy Sifuentes’ Response to Defendant M-1 Collision Care Centers, Inc.’s Special 

Interrogatories—Set Two, No. 25 (FLSA Individual) 

(k) Adrian Ramirez’s Response to Defendants’ Special Interrogatories—Set Three, Nos. 1-2 

(FLSA Class) and 5-6 (damages for each individual claim asserted in the Second 

Amended Complaint) 

Plaintiffs shall serve further responses to the above discovery no later than thirty days after 

this Order. 

3. Plaintiffs Raphael Sandoval and Luis Martin Calixto shall provide further responses 

to the following Special Interrogatories: 

Case 3:13-cv-03230-EDL Document 186 Filed 01/22/16 Page 3 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES FOR DECLARATION STATING ALL

RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN PRODUCED

-4- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. CV 13-03230 EDL

4825-0746-2700v2 

EKENNEDY\15321004 

 Luis Martin Calixto’s Response to Defendant MB Bodyshop of San Francisco’s 

Special Interrogatories—Set Three, No. 25 

 Rafael Sandoval’s Response to Defendant MB Bodyshop of San Francisco’s Special 

Interrogatories—Set Three, No. 25 

4. As to Defendants’ Request for Sanctions, that request is DENIED. All of 

Defendants’ other requests are denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

January 22, 2016

Case 3:13-cv-03230-EDL Document 186 Filed 01/22/16 Page 4 of 4