Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00039/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00039-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUDY G. GARCIA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et )

al., )

Defendants. )

)

 )

1:05-CV-00039-OWW-SMS 

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE, FOLLOW THE COURT’S

ORDER, AND PAY THE $250.00 FILING

FEE OR FILE A COMPLETED

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS (DOC. 13)

On May 17, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and a

recommendation that the complaint be dismissed for Plaintiff’s

failure to pay the filing fee or to file an application to

proceed in forma pauperis. The findings and recommendation were

served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty

(30) days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty days

have passed, an no party has filed any objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

Case 1:05-cv-00039-OWW -SMS Document 14 Filed 07/11/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court finds that the report and recommendation are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation filed May 17, 2005, are

ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The action IS DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to

follow a court order, pay the filing fee, and prosecute this

action; and

3. The Clerk of Court IS DIRECTED to close this action

because this order terminates the action in its entirety. IT IS SO

ORDERED.

Emm0d6Dated: July 7, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00039-OWW -SMS Document 14 Filed 07/11/05 Page 2 of 2