Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02288/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02288-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER – Case No.: 4:15-cv-02288 SBA (EDL) 

- 1 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND COURTHOUSE

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, a 

Delaware Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

A & S ELECTRONICS, INC., a California 

Corporation d/b/a TRUSTPRICE; ALAN Z. 

LIN, an Individual; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: 4:15-cv-02288-SBA (EDL)

 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING DISCOVERY LETTERS 

Re: Dkt. Nos. 82, 83, 84 

 

 

 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER 

On July, 8, 2016, at 10:00AM, via teleconference and pursuant to the Court’s Order (ECF 

Dkt. 84), Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants A&S Electronics, 

Inc., and Alan Z. Lin (“Defendants”) came before the Court regarding Defendants’ Discovery 

Letter (ECF Dkt. 82) seeking to quash Plaintiff’s June 10, 2016 subpoena duces tecum to Bank 

of America, National Association (“Bank of America”), and regarding Plaintiff’s Discovery 

Letter in response thereto (ECF Dkt. 83). 

Having considered the letters filed, and the arguments of counsel presented at the July 8, 

2016 hearing, the Court Orders as follows: 

1. Plaintiff shall serve Bank of America with the Amended Subpoena in the form 

Case 4:15-cv-02288-SBA Document 94 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 6
[PROPOSED] ORDER – Case No.: 4:15-cv-02288 SBA (EDL) 

- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

attached hereto as Exhibit A, which has been limited to only financial documents and 

records in the calendar year 2014. 

2. Bank of America shall comply without delay by producing the documents identified 

in the Amended Subpoena. Bank of America shall produce requested documents 

directly to Plaintiff’s counsel, as instructed in the Amended Subpoena. 

3. In the event Plaintiff determines that the 2014 documents produced by Bank of 

America are insufficient, the parties shall meet and confer regarding what further 

records from Bank of America are to be provided pursuant to an additional subpoena 

to Bank of America, and a subsequent subpoena shall be issued to Bank of America 

in accordance with any meet and confer agreement of the parties. If the parties are 

unable to come an agreement regarding what further documents should be produced 

by Bank of America, the parties shall timely file a joint discovery letter with the 

Court regarding the dispute, if any. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED this ______ day of _____________, 2016. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

 Northern District of California 

12th July 

Case 4:15-cv-02288-SBA Document 94 Filed 07/12/16 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:15-cv-02288-SBA Document 94 Filed 07/12/16 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:15-cv-02288-SBA Document 94 Filed 07/12/16 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:15-cv-02288-SBA Document 94 Filed 07/12/16 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:15-cv-02288-SBA Document 94 Filed 07/12/16 Page 6 of 6