Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00387/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00387-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

GEORGIA MAE GARRETT, et al.,

NO. 2:05-cv-0387 FCD/DAD 

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER OF NON-RELATED CASES

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

Defendant s.

_____________________________/

AMY MCCONNELL, et al.,

NO. 2:05-cv-0909 FCD/DAD 

Plaintiffs,

v.

LASSEN COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

OLLIE ROBERT MACK, III, NO. 2:07-cv-2371 LKK/KJM PS

Plainitff,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF 

INVESTIGATION, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

----oo0oo----

Case 2:05-cv-00387-MCE-KJN Document 39 Filed 03/18/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The undersigned judge declines to relate the above-captioned cases pursuant to Local

Rule 83-123(a). Assignment of the matters to the same judge is not likely to effect a substantial

savings of judicial effort or other economies. Both actions involve the same or similar

defendants, but the actions involve events specific to each party, the questions of fact are

different, the questions of law are not novel, it is not clear that the same result should follow in

both actions, and assignment to different judges would not entail substantial duplication of labor.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 18, 2008

 

FRANK C. DAMRELL, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00387-MCE-KJN Document 39 Filed 03/18/08 Page 2 of 2