Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03272/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03272-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Docket No. 223

2

Docket No. 227

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOSTAFA ARAM AZADPOUR,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C06-03272 MJJ

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is Plaintiff Mostafa Aram Azadpour’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion For Leave to

Move for Default Judgment.1

 Defendants Sun Microsystems, Inc., Matrix Absence Management,

Inc., Babu Turumella, and Norman Yeung (“Defendants”) oppose Plaintiff’s motion.2

 For the

following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On August 15, 2006, this Court ordered Plaintiff to seek leave before filing any further

motions in a related case. (C05-4087, Doc. #199.) The Order was in response to the voluminous

number of motions and notices of motions filed by Plaintiff, many of which lacked grounding in

applicable law and the adjudication of which resulted in the expenditure of considerable judicial

resources. On June 5, 2007, Plaintiff filed his instant motion, requesting leave to “1) Move for a

Case 3:06-cv-03272-MJJ Document 238 Filed 06/22/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

Docket No. 231

2

Default Judgment and 2) Seek an Equitable Relief.” 

ANALYSIS

First, Plaintiff asks the Court for leave to seek a default judgment. The Clerk of the Court

declined Plaintiff’s entry of default in light of Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss.3 As there is

no entry of default, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request for leave to seek a default judgment.

Second, Plaintiff asks the court for equitable relief regarding tax information provided to the

California or Federal governments by Defendant Sun Microsystems. The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s

request for equitable relief. Plaintiff’s demand for relief is duplicative of the relief he seeks in hishis

Second Amended Complaint. (Compl., ¶ 30) Because Plaintiff’s demands are already pending before

the Court, there is no need to address them in this motion.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Move for a

Default Judgment and Seek Equitable Relief. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June ___, 2007 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-03272-MJJ Document 238 Filed 06/22/07 Page 2 of 2