Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04791/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04791-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SUSSEX FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, 

INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BAYERISCHE HYPO-UND VEREINSBANK 

AG, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 08-4791 SC 

ORDER DENYING OBJECTIONS TO 

MAGISTRATE'S ORDER

 

 The Court has received Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate's 

Order and Request for District Court's De Novo Review of Order, 

Docket No. 167 ("Objection"), which raises objections to the 

Magistrate Judge's January 28, 2010 order addressing discovery 

issues and administrative relief, Docket No. 162 ("Magistrate's 

Order"). The Court has reviewed, de novo, the matters outlined in 

the Objection as well as the papers submitted by both parties in 

the underlying dispute, and finds no reason to disturb the 

Magistrate's Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 

Any legal error in the Magistrate's Order is deemed to be 

insubstantial, and the Court agrees in substance with the outcome 

reached by the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's Objection is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 17, 2010 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-04791-SC Document 169 Filed 02/17/10 Page 1 of 1