Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00937/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00937-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MICHAEL GRIMES,

Plaintiff,

v.

RICHARD RIVERMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

2:12-cv-00937 DAD P

ORDER MODIFYING 

DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING 

ORDER 

Both parties have filed motions seeking to modify the court’s discovery and scheduling 

order to allow for additional time to complete discovery. Specifically, plaintiff requests 

additional time to respond to defendants’ discovery requests in light of his recent transfer to the

California Institution for Men. Defense counsel requests additional time to take plaintiff’s 

deposition and file any motion to compel in light of plaintiff’s delay in serving his written 

responses to defendants’ discovery requests and because of an unforeseen medical emergency.

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:12-cv-00937-MCE-AC Document 56 Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to modify the court’s discovery and scheduling order (Doc. No. 51) is 

granted. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall serve on defense 

counsel his written responses to defendants’ discovery requests; 

2. Defendants’ motion to modify the court’s discovery and scheduling order (Doc. No. 55) 

is granted. Within thirty days following service of plaintiff’s written discovery requests, defense 

counsel shall take plaintiff’s deposition and file any necessary motion to compel; and

3. Except as otherwise provided in this order, the court’s July 29, 2014 discovery and 

scheduling order remains in effect.

Dated: January 7, 2015

DAD:9

grim0937.41mod(2)

Case 2:12-cv-00937-MCE-AC Document 56 Filed 01/07/15 Page 2 of 2