Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00355/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00355-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; PROPOSED ORDER

CASE NO. 03-CV-00355 MJJ (JL) 

[APPEARANCES LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGES] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

LEXAR MEDIA, INC., 

Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant 

v.

FUJI PHOTO FILM USA, INC., 

Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff 

Case No. 03-CV-00355 MJJ (JL) 

STIPULATED CONTINUANCE OF 

HEARING; SUPPORTING 

DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

XXXXXXXX

Case 3:03-cv-00355-MJJ Document 168 Filed 09/20/06 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; PROPOSED ORDER 1 CASE NO. 03-CV-00355 MJJ (JL) 

The parties have met and conferred and agree that a continuance of the hearing on 

discovery issues, currently set for September 20, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom F, would be 

appropriate to provide the parties time to determine if they can resolve their discovery disputes 

without the intervention of the Court. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate that, with the 

Court’s permission, the hearing on discovery issues be continued until November 1, 2006 at 9:30 

a.m., or thereafter, as may be convenient for the Court. 

By his signature below, counsel for Lexar attests under penalty of perjury that 

counsel for Fuji concurs in the filing of this Stipulation. 

Case 3:03-cv-00355-MJJ Document 168 Filed 09/20/06 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; PROPOSED ORDER 2 CASE NO. 03-CV-00355 MJJ (JL) 

Dated: September 19, 2006 /s/ Steven Cherensky ____________

Matthew D. Powers (Bar No. 104795) 

matthew.powers@weil.com 

Steven Cherensky (Bar No. 168275) 

steven.cherensky@weil.com 

Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650) 

chris.cox@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Silicon Valley Office 

201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Telephone: (650) 802-3000 

Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 

Anita E. Kadala 

anita.kadala@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Houston Office 

700 Louisiana, Suite 1600 

Houston, TX 77002 

Telephone: (713) 546-5000 

Facsimile: (713) 224-9511 

Attorneys for Plaintiff LEXAR MEDIA, INC. 

Dated: September 19, 2006 /s/ Jeffrey Sullivan 

Jeffrey L. Bleich (Bar No. 144340) 

E-Mail: jeff.bleich@mto.com 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON L.L.P. 

560 Mission Street, 27th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 512-4000 

Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 

Robert C. Scheinfeld 

E-Mail: robert.scheinfeld@bakerbotts.com 

Jeffrey D. Sullivan 

E-Mail: jeffrey.sullivan@bakerbotts.com 

Eliot D. Williams 

E-Mail: eliot.williams@bakerbotts.com 

BAKER BOTTS, L.L.P. 

30 Rockefeller Plaza, 44th Floor 

New York, NY 10112 

Telephone: (212) 408-2500 

Facsimile: (212) 408-2501 

Attorneys for Defendant FUJI PHOTO FILM USA, 

INC.

Case 3:03-cv-00355-MJJ Document 168 Filed 09/20/06 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; PROPOSED ORDER 3 CASE NO. 03-CV-00355 MJJ (JL) 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF STEVEN CHERENSKY 

I, Steven Cherensky, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in the State of California and the 

United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and am a member of the firm 

Weil, Gotshal & Manges L.L.P., attorneys of record for Lexar Media, Inc. The matters referred 

to in this declaration are based on my personal knowledge and if called as a witness I could, and 

would, testify competently to those matters. 

2. The factual representations made in the above Stipulation are true. The 

parties have met and conferred and agree that a continuance of the hearing on discovery issues 

would be appropriate. 

3. The hearing on discovery issues was originally set for hearing on August 

16, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. A Notice of Continuance filed August 11, 2006 continued the hearing to 

September 20, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on September 19, 

2006 at Redwood Shores, California. 

_________/s/ Steven Cherensky__________

 Steven Cherensky 

Case 3:03-cv-00355-MJJ Document 168 Filed 09/20/06 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; PROPOSED ORDER 4 CASE NO. 03-CV-00355 MJJ (JL) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing on 

discovery issues is continued until ____________________________ at ____________. 

Dated: ________________________ __________________________________________

The Honorable James Larson 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

November 1, 2006 9:30 a.m.

September 20, 2006 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Larson UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Larson

Case 3:03-cv-00355-MJJ Document 168 Filed 09/20/06 Page 5 of 5