Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01308/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01308-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARREN KAWAMOTO,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-01308-MJS PC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SERVICE OF SUMMONS

(ECF NO. 6)

Plaintiff Darren Kawamoto is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) 

The Court has yet to screen the Complaint and order service.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Service of Summons Upon All

Defendants. (Motion for Service, ECF No. 6.) 

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief

against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the

prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant

who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2).

The Court will direct the United States Marshal to serve Plaintiff’s Complaint only

-1-

Case 1:11-cv-01308-LJO-MJS Document 7 Filed 07/06/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

after the Court has screened it and determined that it contains cognizable claims for

relief against the named Defendants. “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion

thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the

court determines that . . . the action or appeal . . . fails to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

Plaintiff’s Compliant is in line for screening. However, the Court has a large

number of prisoner civil rights cases pending before it and will screen Plaintiff’s

Complaint in due course. Until such time as the Court has screened Plaintiff’s

Complaint, no further action is required. 

Accordingly, the Court will not order service for the reasons described above.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Service (ECF No. 6) is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 5, 2012 /s/Michael J. Seng 

ci4d6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-2-

Case 1:11-cv-01308-LJO-MJS Document 7 Filed 07/06/12 Page 2 of 2