Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05885/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05885-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1 STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

(Counsel listed on next page) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOE LEWIS LUQUE AND HERMAN 

RICHARDSON, Individually and On Behalf of All 

Others Similarly Situated 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

AT&T CORP., PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE 

CO. d/b/a AT&T CALIFORNIA, AND AT&T 

COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., 

Defendants. 

No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: DATE OF CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case 3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document 63 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1 STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

Counsel for Plaintiff Joe Lewis Luque and Herman Richardson: 

THOMAS MARC LITTON (Cal. State Bar No. 119985) 

SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 

555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-4774 

tlitton@nydclaw.com 

STEVEN L. WITTELS (N.Y. State Bar No. 2004635) 

DAVID W. SANFORD (N.Y. State Bar No. 457933) 

ANDREW MELZER (N.Y. State Bar No. 4270682) 

STANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 

1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor 

New York, New York 10022 

Telephone: (646) 723-2947 

Facsimile: (646) 723-2948 

swittels@nydclaw.com 

dsanford@nydclaw.com 

amelzer@nydclaw.com 

MICHAEL RAM (Cal. State Bar No. 104805) 

KARL OLSON (Cal. State Bar No. 104760) 

RAM & OLSON LLP 

555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 433-4949 

Facsimile: (415) 433-7311 

mram@ramolson.com 

kolson@ramolson.com 

EDMOND CLARK (Conn. State Bar No. 418915) 

LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK 

83 Scotland Avenue 

Madison, Connecticut 06443 

Telephone: (203) 245-4602 

Facsimile: (203) 245-9734 

Eclarkmadisonlaw@aol.com 

Case 3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document 63 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1 STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

Counsel for Defendants AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and 

AT&T Communications of California, Inc.: 

J. AL LATHAM, JR. (Cal. State Bar No. 071605) 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Telephone: (213) 683-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 

allatham@paulhastings.com 

JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838) 

JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 248073) 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

55 Second Street, 24th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105-3441 

Telephone: (415) 856-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 

jeffwohl@paulhastings.com

jeffmichalowski@paulhastings.com

WILLIAM CORY BARKER (Georgia State Bar No. 037727) 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

600 Peachtree Street, N.E., 24th Floor 

Atlanta, Georgia 30308 

Telephone: (404) 815-2400 

Facsimile: (404) 815-2424 

corybarker@paulhastings.com 

Case 3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document 63 Filed 06/29/10 Page 3 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1 

LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.3 

STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JSC) 

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque and Herman Richardson and defendants AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell 

Telephone Company, and AT&T Communications of California, Inc., acting through their counsel of 

record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. The case management conference in this action currently is scheduled for June 25, 2010, 

at 10:00 a.m. 

2. On the parties’ stipulation, the Court has continued the hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for 

conditional certification to August 27, 2010, to permit pre-conditional certification discovery. 

3. Accordingly, the parties believe it would serve the interest of convenience and judicial 

economy if the case management conference were continued. The parties, however, do not agree on the 

new date for the conference: 

a. Plaintiffs propose that the case management conference be continued to 

August 27, 2010, the same date as the hearing on their motion for conditional 

certification. Since the parties will already be before the Court, an August 27 case 

management conference will be an opportune time to set a plan for discovery in 

this case. Discovery should continue between the hearing and the Court’s 

decision on plaintiffs’ conditional certification motion. A case management 

conference will materially aid in moving this matter forward during this period. 

b. Defendants propose that the case management conference be continued to a date 

at least 30 days after the Court rules on plaintiffs’ motion for conditional 

certification, with a supplemented case management statement (as appropriate) 

filed one week before the conference. Defendants propose this new date because 

until the Court has ruled on conditional certification, the parties will not know the 

scope of the case, and therefore continuing the conference to August 27 will not 

materially aid in the planning process. 

4. The case management conference has been rescheduled two previous times by stipulation 

of the parties and endorsement by the Court. However, a further postponement will not affect the 

overall schedule in the case as the parties will proceed with pre-certification discovery and continue 

Case 3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document 63 Filed 06/29/10 Page 4 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1 -2- STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS) 

briefing on plaintiffs’ motion in advance of the August 27 hearing. 

Dated: June 24, 2010. THOMAS MARC LITTON 

STEVEN L. WITTELS 

DAVID W. SANFORD 

ANDREW MELZER 

SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 

MICHAEL RAM 

KARL OLSON 

RAM & OLSON LLP 

EDMOND CLARK 

LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK 

By: ___/s/ Steven L. Wittels_______________________ Steven L. Wittels 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Joe Lewis Luque and Herman Richardson 

Dated: June 24, 2010. J. AL LATHAM, JR. 

JEFFREY D. WOHL 

JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI 

WILLIAM CORY BARKER 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

By: _____/s/ Jeffrey D. Woh/________________________ 

Jeffrey D. Wohl 

Attorneys for Defendants 

AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and 

AT&T Communications of California, Inc. 

Case 3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document 63 Filed 06/29/10 Page 5 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1 -3- STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS) 

ORDER

On the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS ORDERED that case management conference currently scheduled for June 25, 2010, will 

be continued to: 

 August 27, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. 

 a date to be set by the Court that is at least 30 days after the Court rules on plaintiffs’ 

motion for conditional certification, with a supplemented case management statement (as 

appropriate) filed one week before the conference. 

Dated: June __, 2010. 

__________________________________________ 

Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Judge 

x

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document 63 Filed 06/29/10 Page 6 of 6