Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01281/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01281-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Stipulation and Order extending date of Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports

KIM, et al. v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al. Case No. C 07 01281 WHA

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar #69888

BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./ State Bar #222173

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

Airport Corporate Centre

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120

Oakland, California 94621

Telephone: (510) 839-5200

Facsimile: (510) 839-3882

JONATHAN BAE, Esq./State Bar #229967

2201 Broadway, Suite M-5

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 834-4357

Facsimile: (510) 663-6731

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEE YOUNG KIM, individually and as personal

representative of the Estate of RICHARD KIM;

SEHUN KIM,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a municipal

corporation; CHARLES PLUMMER, in his

capacity as Sheriff for the COUNTY OF

ALAMEDA; TARA RUSSELL, individually

and in her capacity as a deputy sheriff for the

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; DAVID TAYLOR,

individually and in his capacity as a deputy

sheriff for the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; and

DOES 1-100, inclusive,

 Defendants.

Case No. C 07 01281 WHA

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

EXTENDING DATE OF INITIAL EXPERT

DESIGNATIONS AND REPORTS

/

Case 3:07-cv-01281-WHA Document 12 Filed 01/02/08 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation and Order extending date of Expert Witness Disclosures and Reports

KIM, et al. v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al. Case No. C 07 01281 WHA

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

The parties to the above-entitled action hereby stipulate to extend the date of the initial expert

designations and reports by thirty days, from January 25, 2008 to February 25, 2008. Good cause for

the requested extension is based on the need for the parties to complete fact discovery sufficiently for

the parties’ expert witnesses to fully review and evaluate the completed fact discovery, currently set

to close on January 25, 2008.

Dated: December 21, 2007 The Law Offices of John L. Burris

/s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum 

Ben Nisenbaum, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: December 21, 2007 Haapala, Altura, Thompson & Abern, LLP

/s/ Clyde Thompson 

Clyde Thompson, Esq.

Attorney for Defendants

(PROPOSED) ORDER

Pursuant to Stipulation, good cause based on the need for the parties’ experts to review the

completed fact discovery in forming their expert opinions, the Court hereby grants the parties’

stipulation and orders that the Court’s Pre-Trial Order is hereby modified only to the extent that

initial expert witness designations and reports shall occur no later than February 25, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:___________ __________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

January 2, 2008

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:07-cv-01281-WHA Document 12 Filed 01/02/08 Page 2 of 2