Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02628/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02628-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The correct spelling is Fizer.

2 Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n.14 (9th Cir. 2003).

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Samuel Acy Wesley, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Dora Schriro, et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-2628-PHX-EHC (LOA)

ORDER

Defendants Schriro, Pfiser1

 and Regina Martinez have filed a Motion to Dismiss

(docket #36) pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to

exhaust prison administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).

NOTICE--WARNING TO PLAINTIFF

THIS NOTICE IS REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO YOU BY THE COURT2

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss seeks to have all claims filed against them in Count

I of your Second Amended Complaint dismissed for failure to exhaust prison administrative

remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) and for failure to allege physical injury to

support your emotional-damages claim, 42 U.S.C. 1997e(e). In addition, Defendants allege

all claims that accrued before February 7, 2005, are barred by the two-year statue of

Case 2:06-cv-02628-EHC Document 37 Filed 08/08/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

limitations. A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

will, if granted, end your case. When deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust, the

Court may consider evidence beyond your complaint, including sworn declarations and other

admissible documentary evidence. Moreover, if Defendants produce admissible evidence

demonstrating that you failed to exhaust available administrative remedies, your complaint

will be dismissed without prejudice unless your response to Defendants’ Motion includes

admissible evidence sufficient to show that you exhausted all available administrative

remedies or that no administrative remedies were available to you. Types of admissible

evidence may include copies of your grievances, grievance responses and sworn declarations.

Additionally, you must comply with the following provisions of Rule 7.2 of the Local

Rules of Civil Procedure:

(e) Length of Motions and Memoranda. Unless otherwise permitted

by the Court, a motion including its supporting memorandum, and the response

including its supporting memorandum, each shall not exceed seventeen (17)

pages, exclusive of attachments and any required statement of facts. Unless

otherwise permitted by the Court, a reply including its supporting

memorandum shall not exceed eleven (11) pages, exclusive of attachments.

. . . .

(i) Briefs or Memoranda of Law; Effect of Non-Compliance. If a

motion does not conform in all substantial respects with the requirements of

this Local Rule, or if the unrepresented party or counsel does not serve and file

the required answering memoranda, or if the unrepresented party or counsel

fails to appear at the time and place assigned for oral argument, such

non-compliance may be deemed a consent to the denial or granting of the

motion and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily.

LRCiv 7.2.

You must timely respond to all motions. The Court may, in its discretion, treat your

failure to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as a consent to the granting of that

Motion without further notice, and judgment may be entered dismissing this action without

prejudice pursuant to Rule 7.2(i) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. See Brydges v.

Lewis, 18 F.3d 651 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response to Defendants’ Motion to

Dismiss, together with copies of grievances, sworn declarations or other admissible evidence,

no later than September 10, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-02628-EHC Document 37 Filed 08/08/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file a reply within 15 days after

service of Plaintiff’s response.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss will be deemed ready for

decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless

otherwise ordered by the Court.

DATED this 8th day of August, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-02628-EHC Document 37 Filed 08/08/07 Page 3 of 3