Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00901/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00901-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Gary Francis Fisher (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on June 

20, 2013, in the Northern District of California. On June 2, 2014, action was reopened and Plaintiff 

was directed Plaintiff to file a complaint. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on June 

10, 2014. (ECF No. 18.) On the same date, the matter was transferred to this Court. (ECF No. 19.)

On March 4, 2015, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s amended complaint with leave to amend 

within thirty days after service. (ECF No. 41.) 

On March 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Motion to Be Heard.” Plaintiff reports 

that this is an important case to him and his mail is still an issue. (ECF No. 42.) However, Plaintiff 

GARY FRANCIS FISHER,

aka Gary Dale Barger,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DIRECTOR OF OPS OF CDCR,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00901-BAM PC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 

BE HEARD

(ECF No. 42)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO AMEND HIS 

COMPLAINT

(ECF No. 44)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Case 1:14-cv-00901-BAM Document 45 Filed 04/01/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

does not include any discernable request for relief which can be granted or addressed by the Court. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to be heard is HEREBY DISREGARDED.

On March 30, 2015, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Request for additional time and to 

augment the record on this case.” Plaintiff appears to request more time on this case because his 

memorandum comes with exhibits, which must be ordered from the court. He asks for an additional 

thirty days. (ECF No. 44.) Although not entirely clear, it appears that Plaintiff is requesting an 

extension of time to obtain documents and amend his complaint. Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s 

motion for an extension of time to amend his complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his amended 

complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order. Plaintiff is advised that if he 

fails to comply with this order, the Court will dismiss this action for failure to obey a court order and 

for failure to state a claim. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 1, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00901-BAM Document 45 Filed 04/01/15 Page 2 of 2