Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02355/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02355-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JEZEN CANLAS, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AIRCRAFT SERVICE INTERNATIONAL, 

INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 16-cv-02355-JSW 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Re: Dkt. No. 15 

The Court has received and considered the parties’ joint case management statement, and it 

HEREBY CONTINUES the case management conference scheduled for July 29, 2016 to August 

26, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. In the interim, the parties shall meet and confer and shall submit proposals 

for deadlines and briefing schedules relating to Defendant’s anticipated motion for summary 

judgment and Plaintiff’s anticipated motion for class certification. Similarly, if Plaintiffs 

determine they will move to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Central 

District of California, they should also discuss a briefing schedule for a motion to transfer. If the 

parties are able to agree on a schedule, they may submit a stipulation and proposed order to the 

Court. 

If the parties cannot reach agreement on those issues, they shall submit a revised case 

management statement by August 19, 2016, which sets forth their respective proposals and advises 

the Court as to why that proposal is preferable to their opponent’s proposal. 

In either event, the parties shall meet and confer further about the scope of any discovery 

on the issues to be raised by Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and Plaintiff’s motion for 

class certification and shall submit a revised case management conference statement that contains 

a more detailed discovery plan, which takes into account the recent amendments to the Federal 

Case 4:16-cv-02355-JSW Document 16 Filed 07/25/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Ru

sub

wil

sta

Da

ules of Civil P

Finally,

bmitted by w

ll not resolve

tement. 

IT IS S

ated: July 25,

Procedure. 

, the Court H

way of a join

e discovery d

SO ORDER

, 2016 

HEREBY AD

nt letter brief

disputes bas

RED. 

2

DVISES the

f. See Judge 

ed on argum

___

JEF

Un

e parties that

White’s Civ

ments raised 

__________

FFREY S. W

nited States D

t any discove

vil Standing 

in a case ma

___________

WHITE 

District Judg

ery disputes 

Orders ¶ 8. 

anagement c

__________

ge 

must be 

 The Court 

onference 

________ 

Case 4:16-cv-02355-JSW Document 16 Filed 07/25/16 Page 2 of 2