Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00512/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00512-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOUISE LISA LANDIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

WARDEN GLORIA HENRY, et al.,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:05-cv-0512 OWW WMW P

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

In her motion filed December 9, 2005, Plaintiff represents

she is a patient at Patton State Hospital after having been found

incompetent to stand trial in the Superior Court of California,

County of Madera. 

She was previously ordered on August 12, 2005, and August

18, 2005, to submit a certified copy of her trust account

statement, or in the alternative, to pay the $250.00 filing fee

for the case within thirty days of the service of those Orders. 

The thirty days to do so had expired without plaintiff’s

compliance. 

The case was dismissed by Order of November 17, 2005,

entering Judgment for Defendants and against Plaintiff. 

Plaintiff claims that she was admitted to the hospital on

Case 1:05-cv-00512-LJO -WMW Document 15 Filed 10/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

September 1, 2005, and that it was not until November 30, 2005,

that she was given a faxed copy of an Order from United States

Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich “dismissing” her civil

rights complaint which was followed by the November 17, 2005,

order of District Judge Robert E. Coyle dismissing her case. 

Plaintiff claims that due to her change of address and her

mental illness, she was unaware that the Court had not been

provided with a new address and that she never received the

Orders of the Court because there was not an accurate address for

Plaintiff. Accepting plaintiff’s; representations as true,

adequate reason for her prior failures has been shown to justify

relief. 

Good cause appearing, the Order of Dismissal is VACATED and

Plaintiff is directed to comply with the Orders of August 12,

2005, and August 18, 2005, by filing a certified copy of her

trust account or paying the $250.00 filing fee within thirty days

following date of service of this Decision. 

A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER SHALL RESULT IN

DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 18, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00512-LJO -WMW Document 15 Filed 10/19/06 Page 2 of 2