Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01904/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01904-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WADE BUSH,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES A. YATES, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01904-AWI-SMS PC

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

RE-SERVE ORDER 45 AND A COPY OF THE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ON

PLAINTIFF AT SCC

(Doc. 45)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

COMPLY WITH ORDER OF APRIL 10, 2009,

WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, OR SANCTIONS

WILL BE IMPOSED

(Doc. 43)

This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Plaintiff Wade Bush, a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Pursuant to the Court’s order filed April 9, 2009,

this action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendant Price for

retaliation in violation of the First Amendment, and against Defendants Ortiz, Benyamin, Foreman,

McCoy, Mattern, Coleman, Manasra, Duenas, Rutter, Walls, andRobinson for denial ofmedical care

in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On April 10, 2009, the Court issued an order requiring

Plaintiff to complete and return USM-285 forms and summonses for the twelve defendants, and to

submit thirteen copies of his second amended complaint so that service of process may be in

initiated. 

Plaintiff did not comply with the order and on July 2, 2009, the Court ordered Plaintiff to

show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Plaintiff filed a response on July 13, 2009, and

1

Case 1:06-cv-01904-AWI -SMS Document 47 Filed 01/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the Court discharged its orderto show cause. On July 31, 2009, the Court granted Plaintiff ’s motion

for an extension of time to comply with the order to submit service documents, and on September

25, 2009, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for a copy of the second amended complaint. 

To date, Plaintiff has not complied with the order to submit service documents and copies

of the second amended complaint. Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address on October 8, 2009,

and based on the timing of that filing, Plaintiff may not have received the Court’s order of September

25, 2009, although the order was not returned as undeliverable.

The Clerk’s Office shall re-serve the order filed on September 25, 2009, along with a copy

of the second amended complaint. Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of service of this order to

comply with the Court’s order of April 10, 2009, by submitting service documents for the twelve

defendants and thirteen copies of his complaint. If Plaintiff fails to comply with or otherwise

respond to this order, sanctions will result, and may include dismissal of this action for failure to

prosecute.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk’s Office shall re-serve the order filed September 25, 2009, and shall

include a copy of Plaintiff’s second amended complaint; and

2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall comply

with the Court’s order of April. 10, 2009, or sanctions will be imposed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:06-cv-01904-AWI -SMS Document 47 Filed 01/28/10 Page 2 of 2