Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03769/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03769-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE

MICHAEL MALK (Bar No. 222366)

mm@malklawfirm.com 

MICHAEL MALK, ESQ., APC 

1180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 302 

Los Angeles, CA 90035 

Telephone: 310.203.0016 

Facsimile: 310.499.5210 

Attorneys for Plaintiff OSMIN MELGAR 

and KARO KHATCHADOORIAN 

JAMES M. PETERSON (Bar No. 137837) 

peterson@higgslaw.com 

EDWIN M. BONISKE (Bar No. 265701) 

boniske@higgslaw.com 

HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP 

401 West “A” Street, Suite 2600 

San Diego, CA 92101-7913 

Telephone: 619.236.1551 

Facsimile: 619.696.1410 

Attorneys for Defendant CSK AUTO, INC. 

n/k/a O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OSMIN MELGAR, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CSK AUTO, INC., an Arizona 

Corporation, and DOES 1-100, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 13-03769 (EMC) 

STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFFS’ 

PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 

Case 3:13-cv-03769-EMC Document 106 Filed 02/18/16 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 2

STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE

Plaintiffs OSMIN MELGAR and KARO KHATCHADOORIAN (“Plaintiffs”), 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Defendant CSK AUTO, INC. n/k/a 

O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their 

respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On December 22, 2015, the Court granted the Motion for Class Certification in 

part, and ordered the parties to meet and confer regarding the time for issuance of the class notice, 

the content of the class notice, and to file a joint proposed class notice within sixty days (the 

sixtieth day would be February 22, 2016). 

2. Defendant’s counsel are both appearing in trial right now in the case of 

Leidenheimer v. CSK Auto, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-9568-DDP-VBKx, before the Honorable Dean 

D. Pregerson in the Central District of California, and will not be available to continue meeting 

and conferring with Plaintiffs’ counsel until after the trial, which is expected to end on February 

24, 2016. 

3. After meeting and conferring, and subject to the Court’s approval, the Parties have 

stipulated to a brief continuance of the deadline to file a proposed class notice. The Parties are 

agreeable to a two-week extension of the filing deadline for the joint proposed class notice to 

ensure that they can fully exhaust their meet and confer efforts, and will still be able to file the 

joint proposed class notice before the March 17, 2016 Further Status Conference. To the extent 

the Court desires additional time following their submission regarding the proposed class notice, 

the Parties are also amenable to a brief continuance of the March 17, 2016 Further Status 

Conference, to a date convenient to the Court. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:13-cv-03769-EMC Document 106 Filed 02/18/16 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 3

STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE

4. As such, the Parties hereby jointly request that the Court continue the deadline to 

file their submissions regarding a proposed class notice from to March 7, 2016. To the extent the 

Court 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: February 17, 2016 

 

MICHAEL MALK, ESQ., APC 

By: /s/ Michael Malk 

MICHAEL MALK. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff OSMIN MELGAR

DATED: February 17, 2016 

 

HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK, LLP

By: /s/ Edwin M. Boniske 

JAMES M. PETERSON, ESQ. 

EDWIN BONISKE, ESQ. 

Attorneys for Defendant CSK AUTO, INC. n/k/a 

O’REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

In accordance with the above stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered 

that the Parties time to file a joint proposed class notice is extended until ___________________. 

______________________________ 

Hon. Edward M. Chen 

United States District Judge 

The parties shall file their proposed class notice by March 7, 2016. The further 

status conference is continued from March 17, 2016, to March 24, 2016.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-03769-EMC Document 106 Filed 02/18/16 Page 3 of 3