Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01365/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01365-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANNY ATTERBURY, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1365 DAD P

vs.

LAURIE VAN DIVER,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On June 21, 2007, defendant filed a pretrial statement and requested leave to file a

motion for summary judgment. Defendant alleges that, prior to the deadline for the filing of

dispositive motions, defendant’s counsel was extraordinarily busy due to trials and staffing

shortages. (Def’s. Pretrial Statement at 6-7.) Good cause appearing, the court will grant

defendant’s request for leave to act beyond time to file a motion for summary judgment. In

addition, the court will vacate the dates for pretrial conference and jury trial. However, the

remainder of the court’s April 6, 2007 scheduling order remains in effect. The court will issue a

revised scheduling order if necessary after defendant’s motion for summary judgment has been

ruled upon.

/////

///// 

Case 2:05-cv-01365-DAD Document 52 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant’s June 21, 2007 request for leave to act beyond time to file a motion

for summary judgment is granted;

2. Defendant shall file a motion for summary judgment thirty days from the date

of this order. The motion shall be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(m). Failure to oppose

such a motion timely may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. 

3. Dates related to pretrial conference (June 29, 2007) and jury trial (September

17, 2007) are vacated. The remainder of the court’s April 6, 2007 scheduling order remains in

effect. The court will issue a revised scheduling order if necessary after summary judgment has

been ruled upon. 

DATED: June 26, 2007.

DAD:9

atte1365.36msj

Case 2:05-cv-01365-DAD Document 52 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 2