Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04077/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04077-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 29:0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

K.C., by and through Erica C., her guardian,

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

JACK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as

Superintendent of Public Schools for the

State of California, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-05-4077 MMC

ORDER VACATING ORDER OF

DISMISSAL; CONTINUING DEADLINES

On March 8, 2007, the Court issued an order dismissing the instant action as a

result of its having been advised that all parties had agreed to a settlement. On March 12,

2007, plaintiffs’ counsel electronically filed a letter informing the Court that two of the three

proposed settlements have not yet been finalized, and requesting that the Court vacate its

order of dismissal; plaintiffs further request that the Court continue, to June 15, 2007, the

April 15, 2007 deadline for the San Ramon defendants and State defendants to file motions

to dismiss, as well as the April 27, 2007 status conference, to afford the parties time to

finalize the proposed settlements.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The dismissal order filed March 8, 2007 is hereby VACATED.

2. The April 27, 2007 status conference is hereby CONTINUED to June 15, 2007 at

Case 3:05-cv-04077-JCS Document 81 Filed 03/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

10:30 a.m. The parties shall file a joint status conference statement no later than June 8,

2007.

3. The deadline for the San Ramon defendants and the State defendants to file

motions to dismiss is EXTENDED from April 15, 2007 to June 15, 2007.

4. The Fremont defendants’ motion to dismiss remains under submission. Pursuant

to the parties’ prior request, the Court will not rule on the motion unless and until the parties

inform the Court that the tentative settlement between plaintiffs and the Fremont

defendants has collapsed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 14, 2007 MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-04077-JCS Document 81 Filed 03/14/07 Page 2 of 2