Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05264/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05264-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

Page 1 – Case No. 14-cv-05264-JST STIP/ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER BOYD, P.A.

CHRISTOPHER B. MAJOR, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice)

BONNIE A. LYNCH, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice)

One North Main, 2nd Floor

Greenville, SC 29601-2119

Telephone: 864-240-3200

Facsimile: 864-240-3300

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP

WILLIAM F. MURPHY, ESQ. (SBN 82482)

TAYLOR F. FORD, ESQ. (SBN 297014)

601 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, California 94108

Telephone: (415) 397-2700

Facsimile: (415) 397-3300

Attorneys for Plaintiff KENTWOOL COMPANY

GATTEY LAW OFFICE

SCOTT D. GATTEY, Esq. (SBN 180875)

1001 Laurel Street, Suite C

San Carlos, CA 94070

Telephone: 650-596-7123

Facsimile: 877-269-4437

Attorneys for Defendant NETSUITE INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NOTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENTWOOL COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

NETSUITE INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-05264-JST

STIPULATION FOR AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff

KENTWOOL COMPANY (“Kentwool”) and defendant NETSUITE INC. (“NetSuite”), by and

through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that the Court may enter an order dismissing

Case 3:14-cv-05264-JST Document 84 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 – Case No. 14-cv-05264-JST STIP/ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

this action, in its entirety (including Kentwool’s Amended Complaint, and NetSuite’s

Counterclaim), with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

Dated: September 9, 2015 DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP

WILLIAM M. MURPHY, ESQ.

TAYLOR F. FORD, ESQ.

By: ____/s/ William F. Murphy_____________ Attorneys for Plaintiff Kentwool Company

Dated: September 9, 2015 GATTEY LAW OFFICE

SCOTT GATTEY, ESQ.

By: ___/s/ Scott D. Gattey___________________ Attorneys for Defendant NetSuite Inc.

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed for preceding Stipulation, and good cause appearing,

hereby ORDERS that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, including

Kentwool’s Amended Complaint and NetSuite’s Counterclaim, each party to bear its own

attorneys’ fees and costs.

Dated: September 14, 2015.

__________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

September 11, 2015

Case 3:14-cv-05264-JST Document 84 Filed 09/11/15 Page 2 of 2