Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00578/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00578-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATENT TECHNOLOGY, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

LAWRENCE WOODMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00578-DMR 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

A case management conference and a hearing on Plaintiff’s motions for default judgment 

and for leave to file a second amended complaint were scheduled for July 28, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. 

in the above-entitled case. No appearance was made on behalf of Plaintiff. Therefore, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that by August 4, 2016, Plaintiff shall submit a statement explaining why 

this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to respond by August 4, 2016 

may result in the dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2016

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:15-cv-00578-DMR Document 105 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 1