Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02253/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02253-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

K:\COMMON\BROOKS\CASES\VORIS2253\MINUTES05.wpd

MINUTES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VORIS v. RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES Case No. 06CV2253JM(RBB)

Time Spent: 

HON. RUBEN B. BROOKS CT. DEPUTY VICKY LEE Rptr. 

Attorneys

Plaintiffs Defendants

Robert Hyde Tomio Narita 

Doug Campion 

 

PROCEEDINGS: In Chambers In Court Telephonic

On June 14, 2007, Plaintiffs filed Plaintiff’s Notice of Ex Parte Application

to Modify the Courts Scheduling Order to extend the time within which to

bring a motion to amend the Complaint [doc. no. 29]. The Defendant filed its

Response, opposing the Plaintiffs’ request [doc. no. 30]. After reviewing

the Application and Response, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have not shown

good cause to grant the requested relief. For this reason, Plaintiffs’ Ex

Parte Application is denied.

DATE: June 19, 2007 IT IS SO ORDERED: _________________________

Ruben B. Brooks, 

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

cc: Judge Miller INITIALS: VL (mg/irc) Deputy

 All Parties of Record

Case 3:06-cv-02253-RBB Document 31 Filed 06/19/07 Page 1 of 1