Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-146/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL No. 1917

Case No. C-07-5944-SC

ORDER GRANTING SHARP 

PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 

RULES 7-11 and 79-5(d)

This Order Relates To:

Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. 

v. Hitachi Ltd., et al., 

Case No. C 13-1173 (SC) 

On August 7, 2013, Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corporation 

and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. 

(collectively the "Sharp Plaintiffs") filed an Administrative 

Motion to Seal Documents Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-

5(d). ECF No. 1834 ("Sharp Mot."). Rule 79-5(d) requires the 

Sharp Plaintiffs to file certain documents under seal because 

certain Defendants in this case marked them confidential per this 

case's protective order. Rule 79-5(d) gave those Defendants seven 

days from the Sharp Motion's filing date to file (1) a declaration 

establishing that the information designated in the Sharp Motion is 

properly sealable, and (2) a narrowly tailored proposed sealing 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1852 Filed 08/20/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

order.

Defendants filed several declarations in support of the Sharp 

Motion. ECF Nos. 1843, 1844, 1847, 1848. For good cause shown, 

and having considered the aforementioned Defendants' declarations, 

the Court GRANTS the Sharp Motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 19, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1852 Filed 08/20/13 Page 2 of 2