Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06393/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06393-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VILLAGER FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, ) 

INC., )

)

Plaintiff and Counter- )

Defendant, )

)

vs. )

)

DHAMI, DHAMI & VIRK, a )

general partnership, MALUK )

DHAMI, an individual, and )

KULDIP S. DHAMI, an )

individual, )

 )

Defendants and Counter- )

Claimants. )

)

) 

No. CV-F-04-6393 REC SMS

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

TO SUBMIT ANY REPLY BRIEF

AND SUPPORTING DECLARATIONS

REGARDING ATTORNEY FEES AND

INTEREST BY MARCH 30, 2006.

 

On January 26, 2006, the Court issued its Order Granting in

Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

or Alternatively For Partial Summary Judgment. Pursuant to the

Court’s Order, Plaintiff filed a Supplemental Brief Re Attorneys’

Fees and Interest on February 24, 2006. On March 14, 2006,

Defendants filed a brief that disputed Plaintiff’s claims for

attorney’s fees and interest. 

The Court finds that further briefing or supporting

Case 1:04-cv-06393-OWW -SMS Document 44 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

declarations by Plaintiff in response to the points Defendants

raised would be helpful to resolving those issues. 

ACCORDINGLY, no later than March 30, 2006, Plaintiff may

file a reply brief and any supporting declarations in response to

Defendants’ filing of March 14, 2006. Any further briefing shall

be at the direction of the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 14, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

810ha4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06393-OWW -SMS Document 44 Filed 03/14/06 Page 2 of 2