Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02946/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02946-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[3035611-1] 16-cv-2946-RS

JOINT STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEFS AND TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

DEF MITCHELL’S MOTION TO DISMISS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

JEFFREY L. BORNSTEIN – 099358 

ERNEST GALVAN – 196065 

BENJAMIN BIEN-KAHN – 267933 

ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 

50 Fremont Street, 19th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105-2235 

Telephone: (415) 433-6830 

Facsimile: (415) 433-7104 

Email: jbornstein@rbgg.com 

 egalvan@rbgg.com 

 bbien-kahn@rbgg.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

FABIO PETROLINO; M.P., a minor, 

through her guardian ad litem, Ana 

Petrolino; ANDRELINA SILVA; 

ANGELA PETROLINO; and ALEX 

PETROLINO, 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; 

EVE ZEFF, ROEL LAPITAN and 

RAPHROGER GONZAGA, Registered 

Nurses, San Francisco Department of 

Public Health; MICHAEL MOHN and 

RUDY ZAMORA, Sheriff’s Deputies, San 

Francisco Sheriff’s Department; 

HEALTHRIGHT360, a California not-forprofit corporation; LAUREN ERICKSON, 

Mental Health Provider, HealthRight360; 

MARY LEFEVRE, Marriage and Family 

Therapist, HealthRight360; NICK 

CRISPINO, Associate Social Worker, 

HealthRight360; DANIEL MITCHELL, 

Officer, California Highway Patrol; and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 Case No. 16-cv-2946-RS 

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO FILE RESPONSE AND 

REPLY BRIEFS AND TO CONTINUE 

HEARING ON DEFENDANT DANIEL 

MITCHELL’S MOTION TO DISMISS; 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg 

Case 3:16-cv-02946-RS Document 41 Filed 09/01/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[3035611-1] 1 16-cv-2946-RS

JOINT STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEFS AND TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

DEF MITCHELL’S MOTION TO DISMISS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiffs FABIO PETROLINO; 

M.P., a minor, through her guardian ad litem, Ana Petrolino; ANDRELINA SILVA; 

ANGELA PETROLINO; and ALEX PETROLINO (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and 

Defendant DANIEL MITCHELL (“Defendant Mitchell”) hereby jointly stipulate and 

agree to extend the time to file a response to Defendant Mitchell’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 

30) from September 7, 2016 to September 22, 2016; to extend the time to file a reply in 

support of the Motion to Dismiss from September 14, 2016 to October 6, 2016; and to 

continue the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss from September 29, 2016 to October 27, 

2016 at 1:30 pm in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco Courthouse. 

Plaintiffs and Defendant Mitchell also jointly stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs will 

not seek any discovery from Defendant Mitchell until after the Court enters an Order 

resolving Defendant Mitchell’s Motion to Dismiss, except that Defendant Mitchell shall 

serve initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(a)(1) and produce disclosable 

documents already collected by Defendant Mitchell’s counsel on September 9, 2016, as 

previously agreed by the parties at the Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(f) conference. 

The parties stipulate to and jointly request this extension to allow for sufficient time 

for Plaintiffs to adequately brief their response to the Motion to Dismiss, and to provide 

Defendant Mitchell additional time to prepare a reply to Plaintiffs’ response. This is the 

first request for an extension of time related to this motion, and Plaintiffs’ and Defendant 

Mitchell’s first request for an extension in the matter as a whole. 

The proposed time modification would impact the case deadlines as follows: 

Deadline Current Date Requested Date 

Response to Motion to Dismiss September 7, 2016 September 22, 2016 

Reply in Support of Motion to 

Dismiss

September 14, 2016 October 6, 2016 

Hearing on Motion to Dismiss September 29, 2016 October 27, 2016 

Case 3:16-cv-02946-RS Document 41 Filed 09/01/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[3035611-1] 2 16-cv-2946-RS

JOINT STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEFS AND TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

DEF MITCHELL’S MOTION TO DISMISS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

The extension of time will not affect any other deadlines set by the Court. 

DATED: September 1, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 

 By: /s/ Benjamin Bien-Kahn 

 Benjamin Bien-Kahn 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DATED: September 1, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

KAMALA D. HARRIS 

Attorney General of California 

JOHN P. DEVINE 

Supervising Deputy Attorney General 

 By: /s/ Micah C.E. Osgood 

 Micah C. E. Osgood 

Deputy Attorney General 

 Attorneys for Defendant Officer D. Mitchell 

ECF Attestation 

I, Benjamin Bien-Kahn, attest that concurrence in the e-filing of this document has 

been received on behalf of the above signatories, in compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3). 

DATED: September 1, 2016 

 By: /s/ Benjamin Bien-Kahn 

 Benjamin Bien-Kahn 

Case 3:16-cv-02946-RS Document 41 Filed 09/01/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[3035611-1] 3 16-cv-2946-RS

JOINT STIP TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEFS AND TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

DEF MITCHELL’S MOTION TO DISMISS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT 

IS SO ORDERED THAT: 

1. The deadline to file a response to Defendant Mitchell’s Motion to Dismiss is 

extended from September 7, 2016 to September 22, 2016;

2. The deadline to file a reply in support of Defendant Mitchell’s Motion to 

Dismiss is extended from September 14, 2016, to October 6, 2016;

3. The hearing on Defendant Mitchell’s Motion to Dismiss is continued from 

September 29, 2016 to October 27, 2016, at 1:30 pm in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San 

Francisco Courthouse; 

4. Plaintiffs will not seek any discovery from Defendant Mitchell until after the 

Court enters an Order resolving Defendant Mitchell’s Motion to Dismiss; and 

5. Defendant Mitchell will serve initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 

Proc. 26(a)(1) and produce disclosable documents already collected by Defendant 

Mitchell’s counsel on September 9, 2016, as previously agreed by the parties at the Fed. R. 

Civ. Proc. 26(f) conference. 

DATED: ___________, 2016 

 The Honorable Richard Seeborg 

United States District Court Judge 

9/1

Case 3:16-cv-02946-RS Document 41 Filed 09/01/16 Page 4 of 4