Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04108/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04108-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

JAQUELYNN C. POPE, SBN # 78600 

WARSHAW & POPE 

934 Hermosa Ave., Suite 14 

Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 

Tel (310) 379-3410 

Fax (310) 376-6817 

KEITH M. FROMM, SBN # 73529 

914 Westwood Blvd., Suite 500 

Los Angeles, CA 90024 

Tel (310) 556-0202 

Fax (310) 476-6318 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, North Pacifica, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

NORTH PACIFICA LLC Case No. C 01-4108 

Plaintiff STIPULATED REQUEST TO 

 CONTINUE HEARING DATE 

v. FOR SANCTIONS MOTION; 

 DECLARATION OF JAQUELYNN POPE 

CITY OF PACIFICA, et al. 

Current Date: February 24, 2006 

 Defendants. Current Time: 9:00 a.m. 

_____________________________/ 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE 

 Pursuant to Local Civil Rules of Court, Rules 6.2 and 7.7(b), the parties hereto, North 

Pacifica LLC, and defendants James Vreeland and Peter DeJarnatt, by and through their 

respective counsel, Jaquelynn Pope of Warshaw & Pope, and Benjamin Winig of McDonough 

Holland & Allen, for the reasons set forth in the Declaration of Jaquelynn Pope, submitted 

herewith, hereby stipulate as follows: 

Case 3:03-cv-04108-SI Document 135 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 1 of 3

03

Case 3:03-cv-04108-SI Document 136 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

The parties request that the hearing on the defendants’ motion for sanctions be continued 

by order of the Court from February 24, 2006 to March 17, 2006. 

 

Dated: February 21, 2006 ________/s/________________ 

 JAQUELYNN POPE 

 Attorney for North Pacifica 

 

Dated: February 21, 2006 __________/s/_______________ 

 BENJAMIN WINIG 

 Attorney for Defendants 

DECLARATION OF JAQUELYNN POPE 

I, JAQUELYNN POPE, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney, duly licensed and in good standing to practice before all the 

Courts of the State of California and the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California. I am the attorney for plaintiff North Pacifica LLC. 

2. Reason for the Continuance. The parties have agreed to stipulate to the request 

for the continuance in order to allow Robert Kalmbach, one of the two principals of North 

Pacifica, the plaintiff herein, to attend the hearing without disrupting his family vacation. 

Plaintiff has informed defendants that the week of February 20, 2006, is a school holiday week 

(“ski week”) for Mr. Kalmbach’s two children and Mr. Kalmbach and his family have planned to 

be in Lake Tahoe from February 21, 2006 until February 26, 2006. The within hearing was 

previously set for February 10, 2006, however, the court re-scheduled all the motions that had 

been set for that date to February 24, 2006. Mr. Kalmbach did not realize until the weekend of 

February 18, 2006 that “ski week” conflicted with the re-scheduled date. 

3. If the February 24, 2006 date for the hearing is not re-scheduled, Mr. Kalmbach 

will disrupt his family vacation to fly back from Reno on Thursday evening in order to attend the 

hearing in San Francisco on Friday morning and then fly back to Reno on Friday afternoon to 

Case 3:03-cv-04108-SI Document 135 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-04108-SI Document 136 Filed 02/22/06 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE - 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

rejoin his family. In order to avoid this disruption to Mr. Kalmbach’s family vacation, the 

parties have agreed to request that the Court continue the hearing date. 

4. Previous Modifications to Schedule

There have been two prior date changes for the hearing: 

(1) On December 8, 2005, the Court continued the hearing date from January 

6, 2006 to February 10, 2006 in response to a prior Stipulated Request from the parties. 

(2) On January 20, 2006 the Court re-scheduled all of the hearings on its 

calendar that had been set for the February 10, 2006 date to February 24, 2006. 

5. Effect on Litigation Schedule

The requested continuance should not have any effect on the schedule of the case. 

6. For the above reasons, North Pacifica asks that the Court grant the Stipulated 

Request of the parties and continue the defendants’ Motion for Sanctions from February 24, 

2006 to March 17, 2006. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and if called upon 

to do so I could and would testify competently thereto. 

 Executed this 21st day of February, 2006 in Hermosa Beach, California. 

 _______/s/______________ 

 JAQUELYNN POPE 

 

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATED REQUEST, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 

Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions is continued from February 24, 2006 to March 17, 2006. 

Dated: 

 _________________________ 

 HON. SUSAN ILLSTON 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

 

Case 3:03-cv-04108-SI Document 135 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-04108-SI Document 136 Filed 02/22/06 Page 3 of 3