Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02084/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02084-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1001 E.R.I.S.A.

---

Case No. 15-cv-02084-NC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GERALD PFEIFFER, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HIGH PERFORMANCE ELECTRIC, 

INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No.15-cv-02084-NC 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS 

TO MOVE FOR DEFAULT AND 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT 

Plaintiffs move for entry of judgment against defendant to enforce the settlement 

agreement and stipulation between the parties. Dkt. No. 14. In the underlying action, 

defendant did not appear or answer the complaint. Thus, the Court finds that plaintiffs’ 

motion is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 governing default judgment. 

By April 15, 2016, plaintiffs must move for entry of default under Rule 55(a) with 

the Court, then move for default judgment under Rule 55(b). Plaintiffs’ motion should 

address the factors set out in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986). 

Defendant will have 14 days to oppose plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 7, 2016 _____________________________________ 

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 5:15-cv-02084-NC Document 15 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 1