Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02819/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02819-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

NO. U.S.D.C. C 04 2819 CRB (EMC)

SUBSEQUENT JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

FRANKLIN EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP

EUGENE T. FRANKLIN, CA SBN 124881

BARBARA F. GREEN, CA SBN 150320

Attorneys at Law

22762 Main Street 

Hayward, California 94541 

Direct (510) 538-0969; FAX (510) 538-6502

Attorneys for Plaintiff

TAMIKO OLABINTAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAMIKO OLABINTAN,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC,

DOES 1 TO 30,

 Defendants.

NO. U.S.D.C. C 04 2819 CRB (EMC)

SUBSEQUENT JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

Date: June 9, 2006

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Dept. 8, 19 Floor th

Plaintiff Tamiko Olabintan and Defendant Shurgard Storage Center, Inc., submit this Subsequent

Joint Case Management Statement and Proposed Order.

1. STATUS OF PARTIES: Due to complications with her pregnancy, plaintiff was disabled and

unable to participate in the litigation from about August 3, 2005, through about March 31, 2006.

2. ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: The parties held a mediation on July 18, 2005. The

case did not settle. Follow-up is not contemplated.

Case 3:04-cv-02819-CRB Document 55 Filed 06/05/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

NO. U.S.D.C. C 04 2819 CRB (EMC)

SUBSEQUENT JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

3. DISCOVERY: The parties have had discovery disputes since the last case management

conference..

On January 27, 2006, Magistrate Judge Chen issued an Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part

Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order.

On May 25, 2006, the parties filed a Joint Letter Re: Discovery Disputes requesting a telephone

conference with Magistrate Chen. On May 30, 2006, the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Chen for a

telephone conference concerning the parties’ discovery disputes over a third deposition of plaintiff and

written discovery.

The parties intend to take several depositions in California and in Washington between June 19,

2006 and December 2006.

4. TRIAL SCHEDULE: The parties anticipate that the case will be ready to be set for trial at the

next case management conference.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: May 31, 2006 FRANKLIN EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP

/s/

By: 

Eugene T. Franklin

Barbara F. Green

Attorneys for Plaintiff Tamiko Olabintan

Dated: May 31, 2006 LYNCH, GILARDI & GRUMMER

/s/

By: 

Ronald J. Souza, Esq.

Lara S. Hilley, Esq.

Attorneys for Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Case 3:04-cv-02819-CRB Document 55 Filed 06/05/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

NO. U.S.D.C. C 04 2819 CRB (EMC)

SUBSEQUENT JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

(PROPOSED) ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation and upon good cause, the Court orders that the Case be continued for a

Subsequent Case Management Conference in December 2006.

Dated: 

 

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15, June 2, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-02819-CRB Document 55 Filed 06/05/06 Page 3 of 3