Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520-445/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiffs have filed a motion for an evidentiary hearing regarding the status of

defendants’ planned renovation of the C5 and C6 units at Salinas Valley State Prison to provide

116 beds for high-custody inmates in need of inpatient mental health care. Plaintiffs represent

that defendants have stipulated to shorten time for briefing on the motion but not to the requested

evidentiary hearing. On September 10, 2010, defendants filed an opposition to that part of

plaintiffs’ motion that seeks an evidentiary hearing to be set for September 20, 2010. Therein,

defendants advise the court of schedule conflicts that would, in their view, render unproductive

an evidentiary hearing on September 20, 2010. Without waiving opposition to the request for an

evidentiary hearing, defendants request that a hearing, if set, be set no earlier than mid-October

2010.

///// 

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 3911 Filed 09/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

After review of the papers filed by the parties, pursuant to their stipulation and

good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ opposition to plaintiffs’ September 3, 2010 motion shall be filed

and served on or before September 16, 2010;

2. Plaintiffs’ reply, if any, shall be filed and served on or before September 17,

2010; 

3. In the event that the court determines that oral argument is required on

plaintiffs’ motion, the court will set the matter for such argument by subsequent order. Absent

such a determination, plaintiffs’ motion for evidentiary hearing will stand submitted at the close

of briefing; and

4. The court will not set this matter for evidentiary hearing on September 20,

2010. 

DATED: September 13, 2010.

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 3911 Filed 09/13/10 Page 2 of 2