Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-03623/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-03623-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 4:18-cv-03623-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

DAVINA PUJARI, SBN 183407

dpujari@hansonbridgett.com

MEGAN OLIVER THOMPSON, SBN 256654

moliverthompson@hansonbridgett.com

GEOFFREY R. PITTMAN, SBN 253876

gpittman@hansonbridgett.com

425 Market Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 777-3200

Facsimile: (415) 541-9366

Attorneys for Defendants TETRA TECH EC, 

INC. and TETRA TECH, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

PROMETHEUS DORSEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

TETRA TECH EC, INC. (A DELAWARE 

CORPORATION) AND TETRA TECH, INC. 

(A DELAWARE CORPORATION),

Defendants.

Case No. 4:18-cv-03623-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS

(Civ. L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12)_

Date: January 16, 2020

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Courtroom: 2, 4th floor

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Case 4:18-cv-03623-HSG Document 46 Filed 08/07/19 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 4:18-cv-03623-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff PROMETHEUS DORSEY 

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants TETRA TECH EC, INC. (“TtEC”) and TETRA TECH, INC. (“TTI”)

(collectively “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as 

follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed and served his Second Amended Complaint on Defendants on 

July 23, 2019 (Dkt. No. 43);

WHEREAS, Defendants timely filed and served their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second 

Amended Complaint on August 6, 2019 (Dkt. No. 44);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s current deadline to file his opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is 

August 20, 2019;

WHEREAS, Defendants’ current deadline to file their reply in support of the Motion to 

Dismiss is August 27, 2019;

WHEREAS, the hearing date for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for January 

16, 2020;

WHEREAS, due to other personal and professional obligations of Defendants’ counsel, as 

set forth in the accompanying Declaration of Geoffrey R. Pittman, the parties have agreed that 

Plaintiff shall have until September 12, 2019 to file his opposition to Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss and Defendants will have until September 19, 2019 to file their reply in support of the 

Motion to Dismiss;

WHEREAS, the agreed to adjustment to the briefing schedule on Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss will not have any impact on any hearing or proceeding before the Court;

WHEREAS, for the reasons set forth above, good cause exists to adjust the briefing 

schedule so that Plaintiff will oppose the Motion to Dismiss on or before September 12, 2019, and 

Defendants TtEC and TTI will file their reply papers on or before September 19, 2019.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and 

Defendants, through their respective counsel, that Plaintiff will oppose the Motion to Dismiss on 

or before September 12, 2019, and Defendants will file their reply papers on or before September 

19, 2019. The hearing will remain scheduled for January 16, 2020, as previously noticed by 

Case 4:18-cv-03623-HSG Document 46 Filed 08/07/19 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 4:18-cv-03623-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Defendants.

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: August 7, 2019 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

By: /s/ Geoffrey R. Pittman

DAVINA PUJARI

MEGAN OLIVER THOMPSON

GEOFFREY R. PITTMAN

Attorneys for Defendants TETRA TECH EC, 

INC. and TETRA TECH, INC.

DATED: August 7, 2019 LAW OFFICES OF MARK W. KELSEY

By: /s/ Mark W. Kelsey

MARK W. KELSEY

Attorneys for Plaintiff PROMETHEUS DORSEY

ATTESTATION (Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3)

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Geoffrey R. Pittman, attest that concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories.

Case 4:18-cv-03623-HSG Document 46 Filed 08/07/19 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 4:18-cv-03623-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The deadline for Plaintiff PROMETHEUS DORSEY to file his opposition to Defendants’

TETRA TECH EC, INC. and TETRA TECH, INC.’s Motion to Dismiss is continued from August 

20, 2019 to September 12, 2019. Defendants shall file their reply papers in support of their Motion 

to Dismiss on or before September 19, 2019. The hearing will remain scheduled for January 16,

2020.

Dated: 

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

United States District Court Judge

8/7/2019

Case 4:18-cv-03623-HSG Document 46 Filed 08/07/19 Page 4 of 4