Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04596/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04596-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

51115/2024704.1 -1- Case No. C 06-04596; Case No. C 06-04660; C 06-4659 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

 Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 

 claudestern@quinnemanuel.com 

 Michael D. Powell (Bar No. 202850) 

 mikepowell@quinnemanuel.com 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 

Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 

Telephone: (650) 801-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 

OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, P.C. 

 Charles L. Gholz (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

 cgholz@oblon.com 

 W. Todd Baker (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

 tbaker@oblon.com 

 Frank J. West (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

 fwest@oblon.com 

1940 Duke Street 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

Telephone: 703-413-3000 

Facsimile: 703-413-2220 

DAVIDSON, BERQUIST, JACKSON & GOWDEY, LLP 

 Michael R. Casey (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

 mcasey@davidsonberquist.com 

4300 Wilson Blvd., 7th Floor 

Arlington, Virginia 22203 

Telephone: 703-894-6406 

Facsimile: 703-894-6430 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff 

MACROVISION CORPORATION 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

Linda J. Thayer, Esq. (SBN 195,115) 

linda.thayer@finnegan.com

Stanford Research Park 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Barbara C. McCurdy, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com 

901 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20001 

Telephone: (202) 408-4000 

Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 

------------

Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 48 Filed 01/03/07 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORP., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MACROVISION CORP., 

Defendant. 

 Case No. C 06-04596 JW 

(consolidated with Case Nos. C 06-04660 JW 

and C 06-4659 JW) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, defendant Macrovision Corp. and plaintiff Intertrust 

Technologies Corp. hereby stipulate and move this Court for an order rescheduling (i) the further 

case management conference from February 5, 2007 to February 12, 2007, and (ii) the deadline for 

the parties' case management proposals from January 5, 2007 to January 12, 2007. 

WHEREAS, on December 5, 2006 the Court ordered a further case management 

conference for January 16, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. and ordered the parties to submit proposals as to the 

sequence in which matters should be addressed by the Court no later than January 5, 2007 (Docket 

No. 43); 

WHEREAS, the January 16, 2007 case management conference was rescheduled on the 

Court's own motion to February 5, 2007 pursuant to the Court's order dated December 27, 2006 

(Docket No. 46); and 

WHEREAS, counsel for Macrovision is scheduled to appear for oral argument in an 

unrelated case before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on February 6, 

2006. 

NOW, WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate that the further case management conference 

currently set for February 5, 2007 be continued to February 12, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. and that the 

parties' case management proposals be submitted to the Court no later than January 12, 2007. 

----------------

Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 48 Filed 01/03/07 Page 2 of 3
The parties have not sought any previous modifications pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 in this 

action. However, the date for the first CMC was set back a week on an administrative motion by 

Intertrust. 

 The parties hereby request that the Court adopt the parties’ stipulation as the order of this 

Court. 

 The parties believe that the present stipulated extension to the CMC date will not affect 

any other dates currently on calendar, nor adversely affect the schedule for this case given that the 

case is in the very early stages. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: December 29, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

 By /s/ Michael D. Powell 

 Michael D. Powell 

Attorneys for MACROVISION CORP. 

DATED: December 29, 2006 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT 

& DUNNER, LLP 

 By /s/ Linda J. Thayer 

 Linda J. Thayer 

Attorneys for INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 

CORP. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ___________________

 James Ware 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

----------------- 1/3/2007

Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 48 Filed 01/03/07 Page 3 of 3