Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00409/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00409-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 362
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FREDDIE WILSON, by and through 

SANDRA TYLER, an interested 

person, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CARMICHAEL CARE AND REHABILITATION 

CENTER, et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 2:15-cv-00399 MCE-KJN

RELATED CASE ORDER

RAYMOND K. PIERCE, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CARMICHAEL CARE, INC., a Nevada 

corporation, et al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 2:15-cv-00398 JAM-AC 

JANET ZAGON by and through her 

successor-in-interest, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SUMMERVILLE AT HAZEL CREEK, LLC 

dba EMERITUS AT HAZEL CREEK, et 

al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 2:15-cv-00387 JAM-AC

Case 2:15-cv-00409-JAM-AC Document 19 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 

JACK HOWARTH, individually, et 

al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COTTONWOOD H.C., INC. dba 

COTTONWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER, et 

al., 

Defendants.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 2:15-cv-00409 JAM-AC

EDWARD GOLDMAN, by and through his 

success-in-interest, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CARMICHAEL CARE AND REHABILITATION 

CENTER, et al., 

Defendants.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 2:15-cv-00432 JAM-AC

ESSIE CHANDLER, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CARMICHAEL CARE, INC., a Nevada 

corporation, et al., 

 Defendants.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 2:15-cv-00411 JAM-AC 

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these 

actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 

2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge 

and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of 

judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the 

parties. 

 The parties should be aware that relating the cases under 

Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are 

assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation 

of the actions is effected. Under the regular practice of this 

court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and 

magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. 

Case 2:15-cv-00409-JAM-AC Document 19 Filed 04/15/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 3 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated Case No. 

2:15-cv-00399 MCE-KJN be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and 

Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings, and 

any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby 

VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the 

reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:15-cv-00399 JAM-AC. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make 

appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to 

compensate for this reassignment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 14, 2015 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ 

 JOHN A. MENDEZ 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-00409-JAM-AC Document 19 Filed 04/15/15 Page 3 of 3