Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-02092/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-02092-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

Case No. 16-cv-02092 NC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IAN MCCRAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-02092 NC 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(d), a court must treat a motion to dismiss 

that presents matters outside the pleadings as a motion for summary judgment under Rule 

56. Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 688 (9th Cir. 2001). If a court converts a 

motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment, the court must give the parties 

notice and a reasonable opportunity to supplement the record. Bank Melli Iran v. Pahlavi,

58 F.3d 1406, 1408 (9th Cir. 1995).

Here, the parties have briefed motions to remand and dismiss, covering similar 

issues. The Court is inclined to treat the motion to dismiss as a motion for summary 

judgment because it appears that documents outside the pleadings are necessary to resolve 

the motion. The parties should be prepared to address treating the motion to dismiss as a 

motion for summary judgment at the hearing on June 1, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 25, 2016 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:16-cv-02092-NC Document 18 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 1