Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00112/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00112-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORRIS DAJON MILLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

WARDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00112-SKO PC

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

(Doc. 41)

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Norris Dajon Miller, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 23, 2010. On October

10, 2012, Defendants Huyck, Johnson, Lyon, Teater, and Moore filed a motion to dismissfor failure

to exhaust the administrative remedies. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). 

1

Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to

the motion within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Local Rule 230(l). 2

Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the

action, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 11, 2012 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant Moore was never located and served by the United States Marshal, but he has elected to waive

1

service and appear voluntarily via the motion to dismiss.

Although Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated, Local Rule 230(l) shall continue to apply to this action, in

2

accordance with the Court’s general practice.

1

Case 1:10-cv-00112-SKO Document 43 Filed 10/11/12 Page 1 of 1