Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-01725/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-01725-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FITNESS ANYWHERE LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

WOSS ENTERPRISES LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-01725-BLF 

ORDER STRIKING OBJECTIONS TO 

EVIDENCE AND DECLARATIONS

[Re: ECF 111]

On February 9, 2016, Defendant Woss Enterprises LLC filed its opposition to Plaintiff 

Fitness Anywhere LLC’s motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF 111. Attached to the 

opposition were three documents containing objections to the evidence, ECF 111-11, objections to 

the declaration of Randy Hetrick, ECF 111-12, and objections to the declaration of Paul Zadoff, 

ECF 111-13.

Defendant’s filing does not comply with the Northern District of California’s Civil Local 

Rules. Under Civil L.R. 7-3(a), “[a]ny evidentiary and procedural objections to [a] motion must 

be contained within the [opposition] brief or memorandum [and] such brief or memorandum may 

not exceed 25 pages of text.” Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the objections to the evidence at 

ECF 111-11, objections to the declaration of Randy Hetrick at ECF 111-12, and objections to the 

declaration of Paul Zadoff at ECF 111-13. Defendant may file an amended opposition that 

complies with the Northern District of California’s Civil Local Rules on or before February 16, 

2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 9, 2016

 ______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-01725-BLF Document 112 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 1