Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02341/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02341-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF IDOYA LIMITED AND NORMAN DEMAJO AND [PROPOSED ORDER]

Case No. 14-02341 RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KAUFHOLD GASKIN LLP

STEVEN S. KAUFHOLD, ESQ. (SBN 157195)

Email: SKaufhold@KaufholdGaskin.com

QUYNH K. VU, ESQ. (SBN 286631)

Email: QVu@KaufholdGaskin.com

388 Market St., Suite 1300

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415-445-4620

Facsimile: 415-874-1071

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Skout, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SKOUT, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEN PROCESSING, LTD, JENNIFER 

NICOLE NEWNHAM, CHRISTOPHER 

RUSSELL NEWNHAM, INFIUM, LTD, 

CITYNET LINE, V.A.N. KERESKEDELMI 

ES SZOLGALTATO BETETI TARSASAG, 

EPIOHOST LTD, EDIBERT IAN 

DEGUZMAN, NORMAN DEMAJO, IDOYA 

LIMITED, BROUSKO INVESTMENTS 

LIMITED, MANOEL LEVY, JASON 

SILVER, JAKE RIOS, MINGKAI ZHANG, 

MR. ELITE TEAM, KRYZYSZTOF 

SLAWINSKI and DOES 5-100,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 14-02341 RS

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANTS IDOYA LIMITED AND 

NORMAN DEMAJO AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-02341-RS Document 95 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF IDOYA LIMITED AND NORMAN DEMAJO AND [PROPOSED ORDER]

Case No. 14-02341 RS

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF IDOYA LIMITED AND NORMAN DEMAJO

WITH PREJUDICE

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Skout, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed its First Amended Complaint for 

Breach of Contract; Fraud; Unfair or Deceptive Business Practices; Violation of the Computer 

Fraud and Abuse Act; Violation of the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and 

Fraud Act; and Violation of the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and 

Marketing Act on May 29, 2015.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants Idoya Limited and Norman Demajo settled this 

matter on or about March 2016.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants

Idoya Limited and Norman Demajo through their designated counsel that the above-captioned 

action should be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants Idoya Limited and Norman Demajo 

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). The parties further stipulate that, except as set forth in the March 

2016 Settlement Agreement between them, the parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees, 

expenses, and costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 10, 2016 KAUFHOLD GASKIN LLP

/s/ Steven S. Kaufhold

Steven S. Kaufhold

KAUFHOLD GASKIN LLP

Steven S. Kaufhold (SBN 157195)

SKaufhold@KaufholdGaskin.com

Quynh K. Vu (SBN 286631)

QVu@KaufholdGaskin.com

388 Market St., Suite 1300

San Francisco, CA 94111

T: 415-445-4620

Attorneys for Skout, Inc.

Case 3:14-cv-02341-RS Document 95 Filed 03/11/16 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF IDOYA LIMITED AND NORMAN DEMAJO AND [PROPOSED ORDER]

Case No. 14-02341 RS

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: March 10, 2016 GORDON & REES

/s/ James R. Reilly

James R. Reilly

GORDON & REES LLP

James R. Reilly (SBN 127804)

ballon@gtlaw.com

James Holder (SBN 267843)

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

T: 415-986-5900

Attorneys for Idoya Limited and Norman Demajo

Case 3:14-cv-02341-RS Document 95 Filed 03/11/16 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF IDOYA LIMITED AND NORMAN DEMAJO AND [PROPOSED ORDER]

Case No. 14-02341 RS

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing 

therefor, orders as follows:

1. The action is dismissed with prejudice as against Defendant Idoya Limited

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2).

2. The action is dismissed with prejudice as against Defendant Norman 

Demajo pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2).

3. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

4. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter, only to the extent

necessary, to enforce the terms of the March 2016 Settlement Agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________________ ______________________________

Honorable Richard Seeborg

United States District Judge

Northern District of California

3/10/16

Case 3:14-cv-02341-RS Document 95 Filed 03/11/16 Page 4 of 4