Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03327/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03327-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THERASENSE, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

BECTON, DICKSON AND CO.,

Defendant(s).

 

THERASENSE, INC.

Plaintiff(s),

v.

NOVA BIOMEDICAL

CORPORATION,

Defendant(s).

 

BECTON DICKINSON & CO.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THERASENSE, INC.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C04-2123 MJJ (BZ)

DISCOVERY ORDER

No. C04-3732 MJJ (BZ)

No. C04-3327 MJJ (BZ)

Following a telephonic discovery conference on June

27, 2005, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties are to meet

Case 3:04-cv-03327-WHA Document 23 Filed 06/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and confer in accordance with the initial discovery order

by no later than Tuesday, July 5, 2005, to discuss whether

their confidentiality designations are in compliance with

Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122 (9th

Cir. 2003). See Contratto v. Ethicon, Inc., 227 F.R.D. 304

(N.D. Cal. 2005). If the parties are unable to resolve

their disputes regarding in-house counsel access to

confidentially-designated documents, either side is granted

leave to file a motion by September 20, 2005. Any

opposition must be filed by August 3, 2005. Any reply must

be filed by August 10, 2005. The Court will then schedule

a hearing if it concludes one is necessary.

Dated: June 28, 2005

 /s/ Bernard Zimmerman

Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\THERASENSE\DISCO.ORDER.wpd

Case 3:04-cv-03327-WHA Document 23 Filed 06/28/05 Page 2 of 2