Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00755/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00755-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

John Calvin Neuendorf, II, 

Petitioner, 

 vs. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

No. CV 12-755-PHX-RCB (DKD) 

 O R D E R 

 Petitioner John Calvin Neuendorf, II, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison 

Complex-Eyman, filed pro se Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas 

Corpus by a Person in State Custody and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. 

On April 26, 2012, Petitioner filed a Motion for Leave to Amend and on May 4, 2012, 

Petitioner filed a second Motion for Leave to Amend. In a June 29, 2012 Order, the 

Court granted the Application to Proceed and granted Petitioner leave to file an amended 

petition. On July 27, 2012, Petitioner filed an Amended Petition. 

 On September 10, 2012, the Court dismissed the Amended Petition and this action 

because Petitioner had not exhausted state court remedies. Judgment was entered on the 

same date. 

 Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s September 12, 2013 Amended Petition 

(Doc. 23), September 26, 2013 Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

(Doc. 25), October 17, 2013 Motion to Amend (Doc. 26), and December 4, 2013 Motion 

for Leave to Amend (Doc. 28). 

Case 2:12-cv-00755-DJH--DKD Document 29 Filed 12/30/13 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 This case is closed. The Court will therefore strike Petitioner’s September 12, 

2013 Amended Petition and deny as moot the remaining motions. If Petitioner wishes to 

pursue his habeas claims, he must file a new petition in a new case and must pay the 

filing fee or file in the new case a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

 (1) The Clerk of Court must strike the September 12, 2013 Amended Petition 

(Doc. 23). 

 (2) Petitioner’s September 26, 2013 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

(Doc. 25) is denied as moot. 

 (3) Petitioner’s October 17, 2013 Motion to Amend (Doc. 26) is denied. 

 (4) Petitioner’s December 4, 2013 Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 28) is 

denied. 

DATED this 27th day of December, 2013. 

Case 2:12-cv-00755-DJH--DKD Document 29 Filed 12/30/13 Page 2 of 2