Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05348/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05348-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FIDEL MARTINEZ SANTIAGO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

JOE McGRATH, WARDEN, )

)

Respondent. )

)

___________________________________ )

CV F 02-5348 OWW WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE

PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS

[Doc. 38, 44]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On July 13, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. 

These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty

days. Petitioner filed objections on August 5, 2005.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has

Case 1:02-cv-05348-OWW -WMW Document 46 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708

F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

July 13, 2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and 

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05348-OWW -WMW Document 46 Filed 09/27/05 Page 2 of 2