Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00780/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00780-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARMANDO MIRAMON,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHERIFF SACTO. CO. JAIL, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-0780 CKD P

ORDER &

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff, a county jail inmate, is proceeding pro se with this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

1983. Plaintiff submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2); however, it was 

incomplete. On April 21, 2016, the court ordered him to file both a completed affidavit in 

support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his prison trust account 

statement within thirty days, or face dismissal of this action. (ECF No. 4.) The thirty day period 

has now expired, and plaintiff has not submitted the required documents. Thus the undersigned 

will recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

////

Case 2:16-cv-00780-JAM-CKD Document 5 Filed 05/27/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 27, 2016

2 / mira0780.fifp

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-00780-JAM-CKD Document 5 Filed 05/27/16 Page 2 of 2