Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01491/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01491-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

E-filed 10/13/2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

MILTON P. TAORMINO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.16-cv-01491-HRL 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

ANSWER SHOULD NOT BE

STRICKEN

On September 19, 2016, the Court issued an order instructing the parties to complete a 

joint inspection by October 7, 2016. The order stated: “[i]f the parties fail to comply with this 

order, the court may issue an order to show cause why the defendants’ answer should not be 

stricken.” Dkt. No. 23.

The plaintiff has informed the court that he has attempted to schedule a joint site inspection 

but has received no response from the defendants. As a result, the court hereby orders the 

defendants to show cause, if any, why their answer should not be stricken for failure to comply 

with General Order 56. The parties shall appear at a show cause hearing on November 22, 2016, 

at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California. The 

defendants shall file a statement in response to this order to show cause no later than November 

15, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 10/13/2016

HOWARD R. LLOYD

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:16-cv-01491-HRL Document 25 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 1