Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00334/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00334-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN VALDEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

U.S. BUREUA OF PRISONS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:14 cv 00334 LJO GSA PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

(ECF No. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR 

FAILURE TO SATE A CLAIM UPON 

WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED 

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT 

TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights. This proceeding was 

referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

On January 28, 2015, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending 

dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff was 

provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. On February 26, 2015 Plaintiff 

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Case 1:14-cv-00334-LJO-GSA Document 10 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January 28, 

2015, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted;

3. This dismissal is subject to the “three strikes” provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. 

§1915(g); and

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 27, 2015 

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00334-LJO-GSA Document 10 Filed 02/27/15 Page 2 of 2