Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00219/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00219-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order 1

B.C. BARMANN, SR., COUNTY COUNSEL

COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

By Mark L. Nations, Chief Deputy (Bar # 101838)

Administrative Center

1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor

Bakersfield, California 93301

Telephone: (661) 868-3800

Attorney for Defendants Kern County, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARY H. FREEMAN,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KERN COUNTY, KERN COUNTY

MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00219 TAG

STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING

ORDER AND POSTPONE HEARING

DATE AND MODIFY BRIEFING

SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; and ORDER THEREON

Plaintiff, by and through his legal counsel, has requested a postponement of the

hearing date on the pending motion for summary judgment as well as a modification of the

scheduling order due to a delay in receiving an expert witness report. Defendants, by and

through their legal counsel, are agreeable to the requested changes and both parties

stipulate as follows:

1. The cut-off for disclosure of expert witnesses shall be postponed to March

21, 2008.

2. The discovery cut-off shall be postponed to June 5, 2008.

3. The hearing date on defendants’ motion for summary judgment shall be 

postponed to April 14, 2008. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion for summary judgment shall

Case 1:07-cv-00219-TAG Document 16 Filed 03/14/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order 2

be filed by no later than March 28, 2008. The defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed by no

later than April 4, 2008.

4. All other dates set by the existing scheduling order shall remain unchanged.

Dated: March 11, 2008 B. C. Barmann, Sr., Kern County Counsel

By /s/ Mark L. Nations 

 Mark L. Nations, Chief Deputy

 Attorney for defendants

Dated: March 11, 2008 /s/ Andrew Schwartz 

 Andrew Schwartz, Esq.

 Attorney for plaintiff, Cary H. Freeman

ORDER

Good cause appearing therefor and the parties having stipulated, it is hereby

ordered:

1. The scheduling order is modified as follows: Expert witness disclosure pursuant

to F.R.C.P. 26 shall now be no later than March 21, 2008 and discovery cut-off shall now

be June 5, 2008. All other dates established by the current scheduling order shall remain

unchanged.

2. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment hearing date shall be postponed

to April 14, 2008. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion shall be filed no later than March 28,

2008 and defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed by no later than April 4, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 14, 2008 /s/ Theresa A. Goldner 

j6eb3d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:07-cv-00219-TAG Document 16 Filed 03/14/08 Page 2 of 2