Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02441/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02441-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Rule 26 Disclosure Deadline as to Van der Lans

LAW OFFICES OFMA

T

HEN

Y

SEA

R

S

LIN

KER

T

&LO

N

G

LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 13711SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95853-4711LAW OFFICES OFMA

T

HEN

Y

SEA

R

S

LIN

KER

T

&LO

N

G

LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 13711SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95853-4711 Law Offices of

MATHENY SEARS LINKERT & LONG, LLP

ROBERT B. BERRIGAN, SBN 146465

KRISTIN N. BLAKE, SBN 135887

3638 American River Drive

Post Office Box 13711

Sacramento, CA 95853-4711

Telephone: (916) 978-3434

Facsimile: (916) 978-3430

Attorneys for Third-Party Defendants

GERALD J. VAN DER LANS and 

VAN DER LANS AND SONS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CITY OF LODI, CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

M & P INVESTMENTS, a California

partnership in dissolution; et al.,

Defendants.

AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS,

COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD-PARTY

CLAIMS.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CIV-S-00-2441 FCD (JFM)

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE RULE 26 DISCLOSURES

DEADLINE AS TO VAN DER LANS 

___________________________________

WHEREAS Plaintiff, the City of Lodi and defendants, GERALD VAN DER LANS and VAN

DER LANS AND SONS, INC., (collectively “Van der Lans”) entered into a settlement in April 2005,

which agreement has since been approved by the Lodi City Council;

WHEREAS, other parties in the South Lodi Area Plume have not reached a settlement with the

City of Lodi, thereby necessitating the filing of a motion by Van der Lans for a good faith settlement

determination by this Court;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Van der Lans have agreed to a further extension of time as to the

deadline for Rule 26 initial disclosures as the same is set forth in the Court’s Fourth Amended

Scheduling Order entered on January 26, 2005 and thereafter modified by Stipulation and Order entered

Case 2:00-cv-02441-FCD-KJM Document 2719 Filed 05/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Rule 26 Disclosure Deadline as to Van der Lans

on April 13, 2005;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, pursuant to

Local Rule 6-142(a) of the Civil Local Rules of this Court, that the deadline for initial Rule 26

disclosures by Van der Lans be continued to August 1, 2005.

SO STIPULATED:

DATED: May 20, 2005 MATHENY SEARS LINKERT & LONG LLP

By: /s/ Kristin N. Blake 

KRISTIN N. BLAKE

Attorneys for Defendants

GERALD J. VAN DER LANS and VAN

DER LANS AND SONS, INC.

SO STIPULATED:

DATED: May 20, 2005 FOLGER, LEVIN & KAHN, LLP

By: /s/ Margaret R. Dollbaum 

MARGARET R. DOLLBAUM

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CITY OF LODI

ORDER

Based on the foregoing Application and Stipulation, the deadline for initial Rule 26 disclosures,

set in the Order entered on April 13, 2005, is vacated with respect to Van der Lans. Van der Lans is

ordered to make its Rule 26 disclosures on or before August 1, 2005.

DATED: May 25, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

THE HONORABLE JUDGE FRANK C. DAMRELLJR.

Case 2:00-cv-02441-FCD-KJM Document 2719 Filed 05/26/05 Page 2 of 2