Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20718/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20718-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

1

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GARY KREMEN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

STEPHEN MICHAEL COHEN, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 98-20718 JW (PVT)

INTERIM ORDER DENYING

DEFENDANT COHEN’S REQUESTS FOR

SANCTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

RE-SCHEDULING REMAINDER OF

DEFENDANT COHEN’S TWO MOTIONS TO

QUASH AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERS;

AND STAYING SUBPOENAS

On March 8, 2007, Defendant Cohen filed two motions, each of which seeks to have a

subpoena quashed, a protective orders and an order for sanctions. Having reviewed the papers 1

submitted, the court finds it appropriate to issue this interim order. Based on the moving papers

and the file herein, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the requests for sanctions contained in Defendant

Cohen’s aforementioned motions are DENIED, without prejudice to motions brought separately,

as required by Civil Local Rule 7-8(a).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on Defendant Cohen’s motions to quash

and for protective orders is hereby re-scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on April 24, 2007 before

Case 5:98-cv-20718-JW Document 1262 Filed 03/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Pursuant to the San Jose Division’s Standing Order Regarding Case Management 2

in Civil Cases, in cases assigned to district judges all disclosure or discovery disputes (included

any motions for discovery-related sanctions) are referred to the assigned magistrate judge for

determination pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a).

ORDER, page 2

Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull in courtroom 5 of this court. If Defendant Cohen or any 2

attorney of record who will be appearing at the hearing has a scheduling conflict with this

hearing date, he or she shall promptly file either a stipulation or motion under Civil Local Rule 

6-3 requesting another hearing date.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending resolution of these two pending motions, the

subpoenas Plaintiff’s counsel issued to Walt Howard and the Bureau of Security and

Investigative Services are STAYED. Plaintiff’s counsel shall promptly notify these non-parties

that the subpoenas are stayed, and in the event either non-party nonetheless produces documents,

neither Plaintiff nor his counsel shall read or review any of the documents absent further order of

the court.

Dated: 3/8/07

_________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:98-cv-20718-JW Document 1262 Filed 03/08/07 Page 2 of 2