Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02591/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02591-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER

CASE NO. C05-2591 JCS 1

STEVEN H. BOVARNICK, ESQ. (99361)

HUNTER AND BOVARNICK

345 Grove Street

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 621-8700

Facsimile: (415) 621-0581

Email: sbovarnick@earthlink.net

Attorneys for RTRN INVESTMENT, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CHRISTINA ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

-v.-

SAN FRANCISCO CENTRAL

TRAVELODGE, et al.,

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-2591 JCS

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to

dismissal of this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. Pr. 41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the Further Settlement

Agreement by the parties dated as of March 24, 2006 in furtherance of the

Consent Decree and Order entered herein, each party is to bear his, her

or its or own attorney fees, litigation expenses, and costs. The parties

further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over

enforcement of the Consent Decree. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins.

Co.,511 U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district court to retain

Case 3:05-cv-02591-JCS Document 33 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cv-02591-JCS Document 34 Filed 04/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER

CASE NO. C05-2591 JCS 2

jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to

this action through the respective counsel that the above-captioned

action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

Pr. 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which

together shall constitute an original document and filed electronically

as called for by the order of this court.

DATED: MARCH 31, 2006 PAUL L. REIN

 PATRICIA BARBOSA

 JULIE MCLEAN

 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN

 BY:/s/ Paul L. Rein 

 PAUL L. REIN

 Attorneys for CHRISTINA ADAMS

DATED: MARCH 31, 2006 HUNTER AND BOVARNICK

 BY:/s/ Steven H. Bovarnick 

 STEVEN H. BOVARNICK

 Attorneys for RTRN INVESTMENT, LLC

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pr. 41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the

Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the Consent

Decree and Order filed by this Court on November 16, 2005. 

DATED: , 2006 

HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-02591-JCS Document 33 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 2 of 2

April 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:05-cv-02591-JCS Document 34 Filed 04/04/06 Page 2 of 2