Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-03260/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-03260-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 31:3729 False Claims Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES ex rel. BRENT 

STANLEY and PATRICK McKILLOP, 

and STATE OF CALIFORNIA et 

al., ex rel. BRENT STANLEY 

and PATRICK McKILLOP,

Plaintiffs,

v.

IRON MOUNTAIN, INC., and IRON

MOUNTAIN INFORMATION

MANAGEMENT, INC.,

Defendants.

No. 2:11-cv-03260-GEB-DAD

ORDER CLOSING CASE

On May 2, 2015, the State of California and Relators 

Patrick McKillop and Brent Stanley (“Realtors”) filed a Joint 

Status Report (“JSR”) in which they state:

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a) and California Government 

Code § 12652(c)(1), the Relators, the United 

States, the State of California, Santa Clara 

County, and San Bernardino County, and 

Defendants Iron Mountain Incorporated and 

Iron Mountain Information Management, LLC 

have all previously filed Joint Stipulations 

of Dismissal in accordance with the terms of 

different settlement agreements entered into 

among the Parties, see ECF Nos. 54, 55, 56 & 

60, and the Court has entered orders of 

dismissal as to each, see ECF Nos. 57, 58, 

59, & 61.

As noted in the status report filed by 

the State of California and Relator[s] on 

March 19, 2015 (ECF No. 64), the State of 

California and Relators were finalizing an 

Case 2:11-cv-03260-GEB-DAD Document 67 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

agreement in principle at the time regarding 

Relators’ share of the proceeds of the 

settlement with the State of California, but 

they had not yet finalized that agreement at 

the time the status report was filed. The 

State of California and the Relators have now 

finalized that agreement. Relators had 

previously finalized agreements concerning 

relators’ share with the United States, Santa 

Clara County, and San Bernardino County.

Based on the foregoing, the Relators and 

the State of California both agree to the 

case being closed.

(JSR, ECF No. 66.)

Accordingly, this case shall be closed. 

Dated: May 12, 2015

Case 2:11-cv-03260-GEB-DAD Document 67 Filed 05/13/15 Page 2 of 2