Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-02670/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-02670-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADVSR, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAGISTO LTD., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-02670-JCS 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

RESPONSE SHOULD NOT BE 

STRICKEN AND MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL SHOULD NOT BE 

DENIED

Re: Dkt. Nos. 47, 53

Plaintiff ADVSR, LLC moved to file under seal portions of its first amended complaint 

and exhibits thereto on the basis that they contained material considered confidential by Defendant 

Magisto Ltd. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(1), Magisto filed a response seeking to 

maintain portions of those documents under seal. The copy of the first amended complaint 

attached to Magisto’s response appeared to disclose material that Magisto sought to maintain 

under seal, by using green highlighting rather than redactions in the version filed in the public 

record. 

On December 18, 2019, the Court sealed Magisto’s response as a courtesy and instructed 

Magisto “to file as errata a corrected version of its response, including all attachments, no later 

than December 27, 2019, either revising its response to withdraw the request to seal portions of 

the complaint (if such a request was not intended) or including a properly redacted copy of the 

complaint as an attachment.” Order Sealing Document & Requiring Errata (dkt. 54). That 

deadline has passed and no errata has been filed. Magisto is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why 

the response previously sealed by the Court should not be stricken and why the motion to file 

under seal should not be denied, by filing a response complying with the Court’s previous order no 

later than January 9, 2020. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2020 ______________________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

Chief Magistrate Judge

Case 3:19-cv-02670-JCS Document 55 Filed 01/02/20 Page 1 of 1