Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00057/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00057-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [N.D. CAL. L.R. 6-1(a) and 6-2] 

Andrew P. Valentine

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 

Telephone: 650-833-2000 

Facsimile: 650-833-2001 

andrew.valentine@dlapiper.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Chunghsin Technology Group Co., Ltd. f/k/a 

New Century Optronics Co., Ltd. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HDMI LICENSING ADMINISTRATOR, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHUNGHSIN TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD. 

f/k/a NEW CENTURY OPTRONICS CO., LTD. 

Defendant. 

CASE NO.: 3:19-cv-00057-JST 

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [N.D. 

CAL. L.R. 6-1(b) and 6-2]; 

DECLARATION OF ANDREW P. 

VALENTINE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Complaint Filed: January 4, 2019 

Current Response Date: March 5, 2019 

New Response Date: April 1, 2019

Case 3:19-cv-00057-JST Document 12 Filed 03/06/19 Page 1 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [N.D. CAL. L.R. 6-1(a) and 6-2] 

JOINT STIPULATION 

Plaintiff HDMI Licensing Administrator, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Chunghsin 

Technology Group Co., Ltd. f/k/a New Century Optronics Co., Ltd. (“Defendant”) enter into the 

following stipulation, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, extending Defendant’s time to respond 

to Plaintiff’s Complaint (the “Complaint”) and requesting a short extension to case management 

deadlines: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Complaint was filed on January 4, 2019; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff contends Defendant was personally served with the Complaint on 

January 8, 2019; 

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to an extension of Defendant’s time to respond to the 

Complaint from January 29, 2019 to February 19, 2019 (Docket Entry No. 9); 

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to an second extension of Defendant’s time to respond to the 

Complaint from February 19, 2019 to March 5, 2019 (Docket Entry No. 10); 

WHEREAS, since the filing of the second stipulation, the parties have continued to engage in 

discussions regarding settlement; 

WHEREAS, as part of those discussions, Defendant has agreed not to contest service of 

process of the Summons and Complaint; 

WHEREAS, the parties have continued to engage in discussions regarding settlement and have 

agreed to a third extension of time in accordance with Local Rule 6-1(a) until April 1, 2019 for 

Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint; 

WHEREAS, because the stipulated response date falls between currently existing case 

management dates, the parties respectfully request that the case management deadlines be continued as 

follows, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2: 

Event From (current) To 

LD conduct case management 

meet and confer per FRCP 26 

March 27, 2019 April 24, 2019 

LD parties submit Joint CMC 

Statement 

April 10, 2019 May 8, 2019 

Initial Case Management 

Conference 

April 17, 2019 

2:00 p.m. 

May 15, 2019 

2:00 pm 

Case 3:19-cv-00057-JST Document 12 Filed 03/06/19 Page 2 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [N.D. CAL. L.R. 6-1(a) and 6-2] 

WHEREAS, the stipulated extension will permit the parties to continue to confer about their 

claims and defenses in this action and a potential resolution. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING: 

1. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that, pursuant to Local Rule 

6-1(a), Defendant shall have up to and including April 1, 2019 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

2. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND THE PARTIES JOINTLY REQUEST that the 

current case management deadlines be continued as follows, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2: 

Event From (current) To 

LD conduct case management 

meet and confer per FRCP 26 

March 27, 2019 April 24, 2019 

LD parties submit Joint CMC 

Statement 

April 10, 2019 May 8, 2019 

Initial Case Management 

Conference 

April 17, 2019 

2:00 p.m. 

May 15, 2019 

2:00 pm 

DATED: March 5, 2019 BESHADA FARNESE LLP 

By: s/ Peter J. Farnese 

 Peter J. Farnese 

EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP 

Jason M. Drangel 

jdrangel@ipcounselors.com

Ashly E. Sands 

asands@ipcounselors.com 

Kerry B. Brownlee 

kbrownlee@ipcounselors.com 

60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2520 

New York, NY 10165

Telephone: 212-292-5390 

Facsimile: 212-292-5391 

Pro Hac Vice Applications Forthcoming

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

HDMI Licensing Administrator, Inc. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:19-cv-00057-JST Document 12 Filed 03/06/19 Page 3 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [N.D. CAL. L.R. 6-1(a) and 6-2] 

DATED: March 5, 2019 DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

By: s/ Andrew P. Valentine 

 Andrew P. Valentine 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 

Telephone: 650-833-2000 

Facsimile: 650-833-2001 

andrew.valentine@dlapiper.com 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

Chunghsin Technology Group Co., Ltd. f/k/a New Century 

Optronics Co., Ltd.

Case 3:19-cv-00057-JST Document 12 Filed 03/06/19 Page 4 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [N.D. CAL. L.R. 6-1(a) and 6-2] 

DECLARATION OF ANDREW P. VALENTINE 

I, Andrew P. Valentine, declare as follows: 

1. I am a partner at DLA Piper LLP (US) and represent Defendant Chunghsin Technology 

Group Co., Ltd. f/k/a New Century Optronics Co., Ltd. in this matter. 

2. The parties initially stipulated to an extension of Defendant’s time to respond to the 

Complaint from January 29, 2019 to February 19, 2019 (Docket Entry No. 9). 

3. The parties subsequently agreed to a second extension extending Defendant’s time to 

respond to the Complaint from February 19, 2019 to March 5, 2019 (Docket Entry No. 10). 

4. Since the filing of the second stipulation, the parties have continued to engage in 

discussions regarding settlement. 

5. As part of those discussions, Defendant has agreed not to contest service of process of 

the Summons and Complaint. 

6. To allow the parties to continue to engage in discussions regarding settlement, the 

parties have agreed to a third extension of time, until April 1, 2019, for Defendant to respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint. The parties have also stipulated to the revise case management dates contained 

herein. 

7. The purpose of the parties’ stipulations are to allow the parties to continue to engage in 

discussions regarding settlement. 

I declare under the penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on this 5th day of March, 2019, at 

East Palo Alto, California. 

ANDREW P. VALENTINE 

Case 3:19-cv-00057-JST Document 12 Filed 03/06/19 Page 5 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-5-

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [N.D. CAL. L.R. 6-1(a) and 6-2] 

ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: _________________, 2019 ________________________________________ 

United States District Judge

March 6

Case 3:19-cv-00057-JST Document 12 Filed 03/06/19 Page 6 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-6-

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [N.D. CAL. L.R. 6-1(a) and 6-2] 

ATTESTATION 

I, Andrew P. Valentine, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file the THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [N.D. 

CAL. L.R. 6-1(a) AND 6-2]. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Jason 

Drangel, counsel for Plaintiff HDMI Licensing Administrator, Inc., has concurred in this filing. 

DATED: March 5, 2019 

By: s/ Andrew P. Valentine 

Andrew P. Valentine 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

Chunghsin Technology Group Co., Ltd. f/k/a New 

Century Optronics Co., Ltd. 

Case 3:19-cv-00057-JST Document 12 Filed 03/06/19 Page 7 of 7