Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-00566/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-00566-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEILA MCCOY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:22-cv-00566-DAD-JDP

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

THIS ACTION

(Doc. Nos. 2, 8)

Plaintiff Leila McCoy, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on August 19, 2021. 

(Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 27, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 

recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to 

plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action. (Doc. No. 8.) The pending findings and 

recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were 

to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 1–2.) To date, no objections to the 

findings and recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Case 2:22-cv-00566-DAD-JDP Document 9 Filed 02/14/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on December 27, 2022 (Doc. No. 8) are 

adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute 

this action; 

3. Plaintiff’s pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is denied as 

having been rendered moot by this order; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 13, 2023 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-00566-DAD-JDP Document 9 Filed 02/14/23 Page 2 of 2