Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01771/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01771-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AARON McCOY,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. TANN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:11-cv-01771-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION

ECF No. 50

Plaintiff Aaron McCoy (“Plaintiff”), a California state prisoner, filed this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 25, 2011. The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 8, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations, 

recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration be denied. (ECF No. 50.) Plaintiff has 

filed objections. (ECF No. 53.)

///

///

///

///

Case 1:11-cv-01771-LJO-MJS Document 55 Filed 09/13/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 8, 2013, are adopted in full; 

and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 50) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

66h44d

Case 1:11-cv-01771-LJO-MJS Document 55 Filed 09/13/13 Page 2 of 2