Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01245/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01245-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIAN L. LOZANO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

R. AVALOS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-01245-REC-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND

DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

FOR DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff, Julian L. Lozano (“plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On January 20, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days. To

Case 1:05-cv-01245-REC-DLB Document 8 Filed 03/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on January 30, 2006, as 1

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Death. 

2

date, plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed January 20,

2006, are ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on plaintiff’s failure

to obey the court’s order of November 3, 2005.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment

for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01245-REC-DLB Document 8 Filed 03/03/06 Page 2 of 2