Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01616/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01616-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Sammy R. Quair, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) is state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction 

of a United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 7.) This action concerns events that occurred while he 

was a pretrial detainee in the Kings County Jail. 

On May 10, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to stay all proceedings in this matter until May 18, 

2016, because he expects to be released on parole on that date. (ECF No. 29.) He further states that he 

plans to inform the Court of his new mailing address. 

Plaintiff’s motion is denied. This action is currently in the screening stage, and the Court will 

screen his amended complaint in due course. Plaintiff appears to be concerned about missing mail 

from the Court related to this case while he is in the parole process. The Court does not expect to issue 

a screening order on or before May 18, 2016 in this matter. Nevertheless, Plaintiff should promptly 

inform the Court of his new address, as required by the Local Rules, so that he does not miss any 

SAMMY R. QUAIR, SR.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

VENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01616-BAM (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

(ECF No. 29)

Case 1:14-cv-01616-AWI-BAM Document 30 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

communications pertaining to this matter. Plaintiff is further informed that he has nothing due at this 

time. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to stay (ECF No. 29), is 

DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 17, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01616-AWI-BAM Document 30 Filed 05/17/16 Page 2 of 2