Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02226/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02226-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT ALLAN PETERSON,

NO. CIV. S-04-2226 LKK/GGH P

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

NATHAN BURNETTE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

On June 14, 2005, the magistrate judge in the abovecaptioned case recommended dismissal of defendant Sacramento County

because plaintiff’s second amended complaint naming officers

Burnette and Deaux and Sacramento County contained no allegations

against defendants Burnette and Deaux. On June 22, 2005, plaintiff

filed objections to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendations explaining that he may have made a mistake in

filing his amended complaint because he has two cases filed with

the court. Plaintiff attaches the second amended complaint he

intended to file with this court in the suit against defendants

Case 2:04-cv-02226-LKK -GGH Document 25 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1 In the amended complaint that plaintiff attached to his

objections and which he meant to file with the court, there are

indeed allegations against Defendants Burnette, Deaux and the

County of Sacramento. 

2

Burnette, Deaux, and the County of Sacramento.1 It appears from

this court’s examination of the docket that plaintiff indeed

mistakenly failed to file the correct amended complaint with the

court. Accordingly, the court hereby ORDERS that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the amended

complaint attached to plaintiff’s objections in Case No. CIV. S-04-

2226 LKK/GGH, as this complaint will be deemed the amended

complaint.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve defendants

Burnette, Deaux and the County of Sacramento with this amended

complaint. 

3. This matter is remanded to the magistrate judge for

further proceedings consistent with this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 15, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02226-LKK -GGH Document 25 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2