Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01674/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01674-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC., a 

California corporation; DAN FOLK, an 

individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC. 

dba HYNES AVIATION SERVICES, an 

Oklahoma corporation; et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-00288-MCE-KJN

RELATED CASE ORDER

HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, 

INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC., a 

California corporation; DAN FOLK, an 

individual,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-01674-JAM-CKD

The Court received the Notice of Related Cases filed October 14, 2014. 

Examination of the above-entitled civil actions reveals that these actions are 

related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a) (E.D. Cal. 1997). The actions involve 

Case 2:13-cv-01674-MCE-KJN Document 42 Filed 10/15/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

many of the same defendants and are based on the same or similar claims, the same 

property transaction or event, similar questions of fact and the same questions of law, 

and would therefore entail a substantial duplication of labor if heard by different judges. 

Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to affect a 

substantial savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties. 

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely 

has the result that the above-referenced actions are assigned to the same judge; no 

consolidation of the action is affected. Under the regular practice of this court, related 

cases are generally assigned to the district judge and magistrate judge to whom the first 

filed action was assigned. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated No. 2:13-cv-01674

JAM-CKD, Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc. v. Sacramento E.D.M., Inc., et al., is 

reassigned to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., and Kendall J. Newman for all further 

proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only is hereby 

VACATED. Plaintiff Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc. is ORDERED to re-notice its October 

9, 2014, Motion for Relief from Dismissal (ECF No. 39) for an available civil law and 

motions calendar in accordance with the local rules. Henceforth, the caption on 

documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as Case No. 2:13-cv-01674 

MCE-KJN. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate 

adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 14, 2014

Case 2:13-cv-01674-MCE-KJN Document 42 Filed 10/15/14 Page 2 of 2