Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01275/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01275-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAMON EDWARD JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

A. K. SCRIBNER, Warden,

Defendant.

No. 2:03-cv-01275-JKS

FINAL JUDGMENT

The court having entered its Memorandum Decision of even date herewith disposing of

all the issues raised by the Petitioner,

IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the Petition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court declines to issue a Certificate of

Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (“reasonable

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been

resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve

encouragement to proceed further” (internal quotation marks omitted)). To the extent federal

constitutional issues were raised before the California Court of Appeal on direct appeal or

addressed or deemed addressed on the merits by the California Courts in denying Petitioner’s

petitions for habeas relief before those courts, no reasonable jurist could find that the decisions

were “objectively unreasonable.”

Dated: May 25, 2007.

s/ James K. Singleton, Jr.

JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01275-JKS Document 22 Filed 05/25/07 Page 1 of 1