Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02622/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02622-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LILLIANA SANCHEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CAPITAL CONTRACTORS INC.,

Defendant. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS AND 

THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

 /

No. C 14-2622 MMC

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE STIPULATION RE:

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

On June 24, 2015, a “Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Extension of Time of

Pending Deadlines and Counsels’ Motion to Withdraw” was filed by (1) Corey, Luzaich, de

Ghetaldi, Nastari & Riddle, LLP, the Law Offices of Parviz Darabi, and Alvarenga Law

(collectively, the “Corey Law Firm”), as counsel for third-party defendants Hernandez

Janitorial Service, Professional CCS Cleaning Services, and JCR Janitorial, and (2)

defendant/third-party plaintiff Capital Contractors, Inc.

The stipulation seeks an order deeming an earlier-filed motion to withdraw to include

a request that the Corey Law Firm be permitted to withdraw as counsel for the three thirdparty defendants referenced above, and an order granting the motion to withdraw as so

Case 3:14-cv-02622-MMC Document 93 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Additionally, the Court pointed out that the stipulation made no reference to a fourth

third-party defendant, Hernandez Cleaning Service, which, like the other three such

defendants, appeared to be represented by the Corey Law Firm.

2

amended. As the stipulation was not accompanied by a showing that either the stipulation

or the motion to withdraw had been served on the three third-party defendants, the Court,

by order filed July 2, 2015, directed the Corey Law Firm to serve the stipulation and the

motion to withdraw on the clients, and to file proof of such service no later than July 17,

2015. By said order, the Court also directed the Corey Law Firm to file, no later than July

17, 2015, the last known address and telephone number of each third-party defendant for

whom they wished to withdraw as counsel.1

To date, the Corey Law Firm has not filed the requisite proof of service, nor has it

provided the last known address and telephone number of any third-party defendant.

Accordingly, the above-referenced stipulation is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 3, 2015 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-02622-MMC Document 93 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 2