Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00088/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00088-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GONZALO R. RUBANG, JR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PEGGY FOCARINO, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:16-cv-00088-GEB-AC 

ORDER 

This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendants 

USPTO and the United States have moved ex parte for an extension of time to March 7, 2016, to 

respond to plaintiff’s complaint. ECF No. 3. Defendants argue that there is good cause for an 

extension because the confusing nature of plaintiff’s complaint makes it impossible to respond to 

in a timely manner. Id. Defendants also represent that in accordance with Local Rule 144, they 

tried but were unable to secure a stipulated extension from plaintiff. Id. In light of the foregoing, 

and for good cause shown, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that defendants’ ex parte motion 

for an extension of time, ECF No. 3, is GRANTED. Defendants must file a responsive motion or 

pleading by March 7, 2016. 

DATED: January 20, 2016 

Case 2:16-cv-00088-GEB-AC Document 4 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 1