Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01383/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01383-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

- 1 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ANDREA M. MILLER [SBN: 88992] 

NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC. 

8001 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 100 

Sacramento, CA 95826 

Telephone: (916) 386-8282 

Facsimile: (916) 386-8952 

Attorneys for Plaintiff ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ENCOMPASS POWER SERVICES INC., 

and AMERICAN ARBITRATION 

ASSOCIATION, 

 Defendant. 

/ 

Case No.: 05-CV-01383-RRB-GGH

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 

(F.R.CIV.P. 41(A)(2) 

Plaintiff Engineering & Construction Co., Inc. filed its complaint in the abovecaptioned matter on July 8, 2005. On November 11, 2005, a Memorandum of Opinion 

and Order the Court issued in which it stayed the matter pending resolution of 

proceedings pending in the District Court for the Southern District of Texas. 

Pursuant to the attached Notice, the matter pending in Texas was resolved by an 

arbitration decision, as evidenced by Exhibit 1 hereto. Plaintiff therefore respectfully 

requests that the Court issue an Order dismissing this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of 

/// 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01383-RRB-GGH Document 35 Filed 08/20/07 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Civil Procedure section 41(a)(2).1

DATED: August 16, 2007 NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC. 

/S/ ANDREA M. MILLER 

By: ______________________________ 

ANDREA M. MILLER 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC 

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the request for dismissal and being fully apprised of 

the facts and circumstances hereby determines that this case should be dismissed 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The Clerk of the Court shall enter 

the dismissal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

DATED: August 17, 2007 

 /s/ Ralph R. Beistline

 Hon. Ralph R. Beistline 

 

 

 

1

 The Order requested may be deemed necessary insofar as although defendants never submitted an 

Answer to the Complaint, they did respond through a Motion to Dismiss that was unresolved other than the 

foregoing Stay Order. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01383-RRB-GGH Document 35 Filed 08/20/07 Page 2 of 2