Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00967/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00967-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP 

1030 G St. 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

(916) 443-4443 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. RE FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER 

THEREON 

Case No. 2:15-CV-00967-KJM-CKD 

 1 

LUCERO LAW FIRM, APC 

ESTEVAN R. LUCERO, ESQ. (SBN #298076) 

steve@lucerolawfirm.com

835 5th Ave., Ste. 200A 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: (619) 308-6875 

Attorneys for PLAINTIFF, 

SALVADOR SHANNON 

CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP 

ROBERT L. CHALFANT, SBN 203051 

Email: rlc@creggerlaw.com

WENDY MOTOOKA, SBN 233589 

Email: wm@creggerlaw.com

1030 G Street 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Phone: 916.443-4443 

Fax: 916.443-2124 

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF 

SACRAMENTO, TIMOTHY JONES, JOSEPH 

REEVE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SALVADOR SHANNON, as an individual 

and as a successor in interest to RYAN 

SHANNON, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a 

government entity; TIMOTHY JONES, an 

individual; and JOSPEH REEVE, an 

individual. 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No.: 2:15 cv-00967 KJM CKD

STIPULATION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF 

LEAVE TO FILE FIFTH AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON 

WHEREAS on March 23, 2016, the Court issued its order (Doc. #45) to allow plaintiff to 

file the Fourth Amended Complaint (“4AC”) in this action; 

WHEREAS defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, TIMOTHY JONES and 

JOSEPH REEVE have until April 26, 2016, to respond to the 4AC, pursuant to the Court’s order; 

Case 2:15-cv-00967-KJM-DB Document 49 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 3
CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP 

1030 G St. 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

(916) 443-4443 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. RE FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER 

THEREON 

Case No. 2:15-CV-00967-KJM-CKD 

 2 

WHEREAS defendants intend to respond to the 4AC by way of a motion to dismiss and 

have met and conferred with counsel for plaintiff as to this motion; 

WHEREAS to avoid this motion, plaintiff has agreed to dismiss the battery cause of 

action against all defendants and the excessive force claim under a Monell-type theory against the 

County in the 4AC; 

WHEREAS plaintiff has provided defendants a proposed Fifth Amended Complaint that 

eliminates the above causes of action; 

WHEREAS to conserve the resources of the parties and the Court, the parties wish to 

streamline the pleadings, and motions practice in this case; 

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, by and through their counsel of record, as 

follows: 

1. Upon the Court’s approval of this stipulation, Plaintiff shall have 14 days in which 

to file his proposed Fifth Amended Complaint that reflects the dismissal of the cause of action for 

battery under state law against all defendants and the cause of action asserting a Monell-type 

claim for excessive force against the County; 

2. The Fifth Amended Complaint shall be deemed served upon the electronic filing 

of the Fifth Amended Complaint, following the Court’s approval of this stipulation; and 

3. Defendants shall have 21 days after service of the Fifth Amended Complaint in 

which to respond in any manner authorized by Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Date: April 22, 2016 LUCERO LAW FIRM 

 /s/ Estevan R. Lucero 

 ESTEVAN R. LUCERO 

 Attorney for Plaintiff SALVADOR SHANNON 

Case 2:15-cv-00967-KJM-DB Document 49 Filed 04/27/16 Page 2 of 3
CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP 

1030 G St. 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

(916) 443-4443 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. RE FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER 

THEREON 

Case No. 2:15-CV-00967-KJM-CKD 

 3 

DATE: April 22. 2016 CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP 

 /s/ Robert L. Chalfant 

 ROBERT L. CHALFANT 

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF 

SACRAMENTO , TIMOTHY JONES, JOSEPH 

REEVE 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

After considering the Stipulation by and between the parties through their counsel of 

record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Upon the Court’s approval of this stipulation, Plaintiff shall have 14 days in which 

to file his proposed Fifth Amended Complaint that reflects the dismissal of the cause of action for 

battery under state law against all defendants and the cause of action asserting a Monell-type 

claim for excessive force against the County; 

2. The Fifth Amended Complaint shall be deemed served upon the electronic filing 

of the Fifth Amended Complaint, following the Court’s approval of this stipulation; and 

3. Defendants shall have 21 days after service of the Fifth Amended Complaint in 

which to respond in any manner authorized by Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE: April 27, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-00967-KJM-DB Document 49 Filed 04/27/16 Page 3 of 3