Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01480/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01480-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1480

JUPITER DENNELL WILSON, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT; 

CHIEF EDMOND ELLIOT, in their individual and official 

capacity; DEPUTY CHIEF DAN FERMIL, in their individual and 

official capacity; DEPUTY CHIEF ALVIN ELLIS, in their 

individual and official capacity; DIVISION CHIEF JEFFREY 

RABEAU, in their individual and official capacity; BATTALION 

CHIEF CARLTON ACKISS, in their individual and official 

capacity; CAPTAIN MICHAEL TORTURA, in their individual and 

official capacity; LIEUTENANT WILLIAM DISAROON, in their 

individual and official capacity; LIEUTENANT DUANE DAGGERS, 

in their individual and official capacity; LIEUTENANT JERRY 

BOHN, in their individual and official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:14-cv-00420-MSD-DEM)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-1480 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/11/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Jupiter Dennell Wilson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Anne 

Hamann, Dana English Sanford, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, 

Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1480 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/11/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Jupiter Wilson, Sr., appeals the district court’s order 

granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his action alleging 

violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 

U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2015), and the 

Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 

to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2015). We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we modify 

the dismissal order to reflect that the district court’s 

dismissal of the individual defendants in their official 

capacities is without prejudice, we affirm the dismissal as 

modified. Wilson v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:14-cv-00420-MSDDEM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 3 & entered Apr. 6, 2015). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Appeal: 15-1480 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/11/2015 Pg: 3 of 3