Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05152/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05152-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE APPLE AND AT&TM

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C-07-05152 JW (PVT)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS

PAUL HOLMAN AND LUCY

RIVELLO’S MOTION TO SHORTEN

TIME

[Docket No. 257]

Plaintiffs Paul Holman and Lucy Rivello move to shorten time on their motion to compel

interim lead counsel to produce to other class counsel unredacted versions of all papers filed

under seal. (collectively “plaintiffs”). 

Plaintiffs have noticed the above-specified motion for March 9, 2010. In support of their

motion to shorten time, plaintiffs state that their counsel is unable to fulfill his duties to them

because interim lead counsel has not allowed him to review the various filings made in the case. 

Plaintiffs state that if their counsel is fully informed he may be able to provide “valuable

insights” into the pending motion for class certification. Additionally, any opposition to interim

lead counsel’s motion to be appointed lead counsel for the class is due no later than March 16,

2010. 

Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW Document 266 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The holding of this court is limited to the particular facts and circumstances underlying

the present motion.

ORDER, page 2

Neither interim lead counsel nor any other party has opposed the motion to shorten time.

Civil L.R. 6-3 requires the moving party to “identif[y] the substantial harm or prejudice

that would occur if the Court did not change the time.”

Having reviewed the papers and considered the arguments of counsel, plaintiffs’ motion

is granted.1

 The hearing shall be held on March 2, 2010 at 10AM in Courtroom 5. Any

oppositions shall be filed no later than February 19, 2010 and replies, if any, shall be filed no

later than February 24, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2010

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW Document 266 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 3

Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW Document 266 Filed 02/12/10 Page 3 of 3