Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00241/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00241-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty

---

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING MTD HEARING & BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERT C. SCHUBERT 62684

WILLEM F. JONCKHEER 178748

SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650

San Francisco, CA 94111

(415) 788-4220

ROBERT I. HARWOOD

MATTHEW M. HOUSTON

BENJAMIN I. SACHS-MICHAELS

HARWOOD FEFFER LLP

488 Madison Avenue

New York, NY 10022

(212) 935-7400

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN OSWALD, Derivatively on Behalf of 

Nominal Defendant IDENTIV, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

STEVEN HUMPHREYS, JASON HART, 

JAMES OUSLEY, GARY KREMEN, SAAD 

ALAZEM, DANIEL S. WENZEL, and BRIAN 

NELSON,

Defendants,

and

IDENTIV, INC.,

Nominal Defendant.

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND 

SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON

NOMINAL DEFENDANT IDENTIV, 

INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Courtroom: 6

Case 3:16-cv-00241-CRB Document 24 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 3
- 1 -

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING MTD HEARING & 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, this action is a shareholder derivative action filed on January 14, 2016; 

WHEREAS, this action is factually related to a putative class action alleging violations of 

federal securities laws that is also pending before this Court: Rok v. Identiv, et al., Case No. 15-

cv-05775-CRB (the “Securities Class Action”);

WHEREAS, on March 3, 2016, the Parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order 

regarding a temporary stay of this action and setting a schedule for filing Plaintiff’s Amended 

Complaint and Identiv, Inc.’s (“Identiv”) response to that complaint (Docket No. 14), which the 

Court approved on March 8, 2016 (Docket No. 15); 

WHEREAS, on June 17, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint (Docket No. 21); 

WHEREAS, on August 1, 2016, Identiv filed its Motion to Dismiss and noticed a hearing 

on the Motion for September 16, 2016 (Docket No. 22);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s response to the Motion to Dismiss is currently due August 15, 

2016;

WHEREAS, in light of the short period of time for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to 

Dismiss under the current briefing schedule and Plaintiff counsel’s pre-existing summer schedule, 

as well as the Court’s current availability, Plaintiff has requested that Identiv agree to an 

extension of the current briefing schedule and a continuance of the current hearing date; 

WHEREAS, Identiv has no objection to this request; and

NOW, THEREFORE the Parties respectfully request that the Court enter an Order as 

follows:

1. Plaintiff’s response in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is due September 1, 

2016. 

2. Defendants’ reply in further support of the Motion to Dismiss is due September 

30, 2016. 

3. A hearing on the Motion to Dismiss will be held on October 14, 2016, or at 

another date and time as the Court may order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 3:16-cv-00241-CRB Document 24 Filed 08/08/16 Page 2 of 3
- 2 -

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00241-CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING MTD HEARING & 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: August 4, 2016 SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP

Robert C. Schubert

Willem F. Jonckheer

By: /s/ Willem F. Jonckheer 

WILLEM F. JONCKHEER

Robert I. Harwood

Matthew M. Houston

Benjamin I. Sachs-Michaels

HARWOOD FEFFER LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff Ryan Oswald

DATED: August 4, 2016 PAUL HASTINGS LLP

By: /s/ Christopher H. McGrath

CHRISTOPHER H. MCGRATH

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Identiv, Inc. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 8, 2016

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

Case 3:16-cv-00241-CRB Document 24 Filed 08/08/16 Page 3 of 3