Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02324/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02324-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RUSSELL MOYLE, et al. v. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, et al. Page 1 USDC, Northern District, Case No. CIV.S.05-2324 JCS

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFS’ OPPOSITION TO THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE UP TO A 35 PAGE REPLY BRIEF 

TO DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

LAW OFFICES OF MARK E. MERIN

Mark E. Merin, SBN. 043849

2001 P Street, Suite 100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 443-6911

Facsimile: (916) 447-8336

Email: mark@markmerin.com

CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK

Andrew C. Schwartz, SBN 64578

2121 North California Blvd., Suite 1020

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Telephone: (925) 947-1147

Facsimile: (925) 947-1131

Email: schwartz@cmslaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

—o0o—

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

—o0o—

RUSSELL MOYLE, a minor, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, et al. 

Defendants.

CASE NO: CIV.S.05-2324 JCS

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO

DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO

THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST

FOR LEAVE TO FILE UP TO A 35

PAGE BRIEF IN REPLY TO

DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS

CERTIFICATION; [PROPOSED]

ORDER [Local Rule 7-11]

DATE: October 12, 2007

TIME: 9:30 a.m.

CTRM: 15

JUDGE: Hon. Joseph C. Spero

COMPLAINT FILED: June 8, 2005

TRIAL DATE: Not Set

Defendants object to Plaintiffs' request for leave to file a brief which exceeds the allotted

15 pages for a reply brief. Plaintiffs have completed the reply brief in question. It is 21 pages. 

Defendants' objections are based on various claims and accusations which Plaintiffs will

not dignify with a response. Suffice to say new issues were raised in opposition to the class

Case 3:05-cv-02324-JCS Document 61 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RUSSELL MOYLE, et al. v. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, et al. Page 2 USDC, Northern District, Case No. CIV.S.05-2324 JCS

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFS’ OPPOSITION TO THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE UP TO A 35 PAGE REPLY BRIEF 

TO DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

F:\WPWORK\MCNULTY\PLEADING\COMPLAIN.DOC

certification motion, including the issues relating to the merits of plaintiffs' claims for damages

and injunctive relief. This has necessitated a slightly longer brief. Plaintiffs' counsel has

proceeded in good faith at all times.

Accordingly, plaintiffs submit that it is reasonable to be granted permission to file the 21

page brief.

DATED: July 18, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN

CASPER MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK

/s/ - “Mark E. Merin”

BY: 

Mark E. Merin

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE UP TO A 22-PAGE REPLY BRIEF

FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, plaintiff’s request to file up to a 21-page reply brief

in support of their Motion for Class Certification is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file a brief not to

exceed 21 pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________ ________________________________________

HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO 

U.S. District Court Judge, Northern District

7/23/7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:05-cv-02324-JCS Document 61 Filed 07/23/07 Page 2 of 2