Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02586/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02586-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BYRON SCOTT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2586 LKK GGH P

vs.

CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On December 20, 2007, the court recommended that plaintiff’s summary

judgment motion be denied and that defendants’ summary judgment motion be granted. On

March 12, 2006, the Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton referred this matter back to the

undersigned. Judge Karlton found that after the findings and recommendations were issued, the

Ninth Circuit decided Shakur v. Schriro, 514 F.3d 878 (9th Cir. 2008), which changed the

analysis applicable to plaintiff’s claims. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion filed July 16, 2007, and defendants’

summary judgment motion filed June 28, 2007, are vacated;

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02586-LKK -GGH Document 107 Filed 03/20/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The parties are granted thirty days from the date of this order to file renewed

summary judgment motions addressing the new legal standard set forth in Shakur v. Schriro.

DATED: 03/20/08

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

sc2586.ord

Case 2:04-cv-02586-LKK -GGH Document 107 Filed 03/20/08 Page 2 of 2