Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02500/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02500-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

CROWELL

& MORING LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME

CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02500-JSW

CROWELL & MORING LLP

Kevin C. Mayer (CSB No. 118177)

E-mail: KMayer@crowell.com

275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415.986.2800

Facsimile: 415.986.2827

Andrew D. Kaplan (Appearance pro hac vice)

E-mail: AKaplan@crowell.com

Rebecca B. Chaney (Appearance pro hac vice)

E-mail: RChaney@crowell.com

1001 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: 202.624.2500

Facsimile: 202.628.5116

Attorneys for Defendant Cordis Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

DEANNA COTTRELL 

Plaintiff,

v.

CORDIS CORPORATION, and 

JOHNSON & JOHNSON,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:16-CV-02500-JSW

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT CORDIS CORPORATION 

TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

The Honorable Jeffrey S. White

Complaint Filed: June 21, 2016

Case 4:16-cv-02500-JSW Document 38-1 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 2 Case 4:16-cv-02500-JSW Document 39 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 2
CROWELL

& MORING LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO

EXTEND TIME

CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02500-JSW

WHEREAS, the hearing on Plaintiff Deanna Cottrell’s (“Cottrell) Motion to Remand is 

set for hearing on August 12, 2016, Cottrell and defendant Cordis Corporation (“Cordis”) have 

stipulated to extend the time Cordis has to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint until fourteen (14) days after the Court rules on the jurisdictional/remand 

issue.

WHEREAS, this extension will not alter any event or deadline set in any Court order.

For these reasons, and for good cause shown, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Cordis’ 

request to extend its time to answer or respond to plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint until 

fourteen (14) days after the Court has ruled on the jurisdictional/remand issue is granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________, 2016. ____________________________________

Honorable Jeffrey S. White

United States District Judge

Case 4:16-cv-02500-JSW Document 38-1 Filed 07/01/16 Page 2 of 2

July 5

Case 4:16-cv-02500-JSW Document 39 Filed 07/05/16 Page 2 of 2