Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_00-cv-05817/USCOURTS-caed-1_00-cv-05817-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSH THOMAS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

D.L. STEPHENS, et al., )

)

Defendants )

____________________________________)

CV F 00-5817 AWI SMS P

ORDER CONTINUING THE

FEBRUARY 5, 2007 HEARING TO

MARCH 12, 2007 AT 3:30 p.m.

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

RE-FILE HIS DECEMBER 13, 2006 

MOTION FOR FURTHER

DEPOSITION

This action proceeds on Plaintiff Josh Thomas’ First Amended Complaint filed on

October 30, 2000. Trial has been vacated. The court allowed the parties to depose Defendant

Caetana by written deposition because it appeared Defendant Caetana’s medical condition would

most likely prevent Defendant Caetana’s testimony at trial. Upon receiving Defendant

Caetana’s responses, on December 13, 2006, Plaintiff filed objections to portions of the

deposition and a motion to conduct further deposition. On January 24, 2007, Defendants filed an

opposition.

The motion for further deposition before the court contains a total of 13 pages. The first

two pages are Plaintiff’s argument and the last eleven pages contain exhibits. Based on the way

the second page’s argument ends abruptly and Defendants’ discussion of arguments made on

pages the court does not have, the court believes it did not receive all pages of Plaintiff’s motion. 

Plaintiff is asked to re-submit his motion to the court.

Case 1:00-cv-05817-LJO-SMS Document 254 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Accordingly, the court ORDERS that:

1. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to re-file his December 13, 2006 motion for

further deposition within ten days of this order’s date of service. If

Plaintiff does not have a copy of this motion in his possession, Plaintiff is

directed to immediately contact the court and Defendants’ counsel. If

Defendants’ counsel receives notice that Plaintiff does not have another

copy of the document, the court requests Defendants’ counsel to submit a

copy of this motion to the court;

2. The February 5, 2007 hearing is CONTINUED to March 12, 2007 at 3:30

p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:00-cv-05817-LJO-SMS Document 254 Filed 01/29/07 Page 2 of 2