Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00395/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00395-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 320
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 45:51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HIL

D

E

B

R

A

N

D, M

C

L

E

O

D

&

N

E

LSO

N, IN

C.

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

WESTLAKE BUILDING

350 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, FOURTH FLOOR

OAKLAND CALIFORNIA 94612-2006

(510) 451-6732

1

Anthony S. Petru, Esq. (SBN 91399) 

David B. Draheim, Esq. (SBN 36339) 

HILDEBRAND, McLEOD & NELSON, INC. 

Westlake Building 

350 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Fourth Floor 

Oakland, CA 94612-2006 

TEL: (510) 451-6732 

FAX: (510) 465-7023 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MICHAEL S. TUCKER 

Thomas Cregger, Esq. (SBN 124402) 

RANDOLPH, CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP 

1030 G Street 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

TEL: (916) 443-4443 

FAX: (916) 43-2124 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO 

MICHAEL S. TUCKER, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a 

corporation; VERLEY FARMS, business 

entity, form unknown; DAVID LYNN 

VERLEY, an individual, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

)

) 

) 

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-00395-RRB-EFB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

DISMISS ONLY PLAINTIFF’S 

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION 

AGAINST DEFENDANT BNSF 

RAILWAY COMPANY 

. . . 

. . . 

. . . 

. . . 

. . . 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00395-JAM-EFB Document 21 Filed 09/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HIL

D

E

B

R

A

N

D, M

C

L

E

O

D

&

N

E

LSO

N, IN

C.

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

WESTLAKE BUILDING

350 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, FOURTH FLOOR

OAKLAND CALIFORNIA 94612-2006

(510) 451-6732

2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties acting through their 

respective counsel, that plaintiff’s second cause of action only (Plaintiff’s Complaint, 4:3-21) 

against defendant BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY should be dismissed. 

DATED: August 2007 

HILDEBRAND, McLEOD & NELSON, INC. 

By: 

ANTHONY S. PETRU, ESQ. 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

MICHAEL S. TUCKER 

DATED: August 2007 

RANDOLPH, CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP 

By: 

THOMAS C. CREGGER, ESQ. 

Attorney for Defendant 

BNSF RAILWAYCOMPANY 

O R D E R

The Court having reviewed the Stipulation to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Cause of 

Action against Defendant BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, and having been fully advised of the 

premises, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s second cause of action alleged in his 

complaint against defendant BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY is hereby dismissed. All other plaintiff 

causes of actions against defendant BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and defendants, DAVID LYNN 

VERLEY and VERLEY FARMS remain at issue. 

DATED: September 18, 2007 

 /s/ Ralph R. Beistline______________________

 THE HONORABLE RALPH R. BEISTLINE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00395-JAM-EFB Document 21 Filed 09/19/07 Page 2 of 2