Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00095/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00095-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On March 7, 2015, the parties notified the Court they had resolved their dispute. (Doc. 64) To 

allow sufficient time to finalize their settlement in a written document, the Court ordered the parties to 

file their request for dismissal by April 15, 2016. (Doc. 66) Despite this, the parties have taken no 

action. Therefore, the Court ORDERS:

1. Within 14 days, the parties and their counsel SHALL show cause in writing why 

sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court’s orders. Alternatively, 

within 14 days, they may file the joint request for dismissal.

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the 

dismissal of the action or an order striking the answer and entering default.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 9, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PETER GRAFF, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF TEHACHAPI, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00095 LJO JLT

ORDER TO THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL TO 

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD 

NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO 

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS

Case 1:14-cv-00095-LJO-JLT Document 67 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 1