Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01097/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01097-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH DUANE ARLINE, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

WARDEN KEN CLARK, 

Defendant.

 /

1:07-cv-01097-LJO-GSA-PC

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT 

TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

(Doc. 4.)

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

Keith Duane Arline, Jr. (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the original

complaint commencing this action on June 27, 2007 in the Western Division of the United States

District Court of the Central District. The case was transferred to the Eastern District on July 16,

2007. (Doc. 4.)

On May 15, 2009, defendant Ken Clark filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. 22.) On March 31,

2010, the court granted in part and denied in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. 40.) This

action now proceeds on the original complaint against Defendant Ken Clark, on plaintiff’s claims

for inadequate outdoor exercise under the Eighth Amendment, with regard to only two specific

instances of modified programming, one beginning on August 15, 2006, and the other beginning on

October 20, 2006. (Doc. 41.)

Case 1:07-cv-01097-LJO-GBC Document 47 Filed 06/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

At this stage of the proceedings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Ken Clark shall

file an answer to the complaint, within thirty days from the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 1, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01097-LJO-GBC Document 47 Filed 06/01/10 Page 2 of 2