Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06058/USCOURTS-ca4-10-06058-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6058

PAUL SCINTO, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EDWARD GLENN PRESTON; RALPH MELTON, JR.; FRANK POLUMBO; ERIC 

WING; THE CITY OF NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA; ESTATE OF BRIAN 

LEMAY,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

E&J AUTOMOTIVE, et al.; BRIAN LEMAY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (4:03-cv-00178-H)

Submitted: July 20, 2010 Decided: August 12, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Scinto, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James Carlton Thornton, 

PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; W. 

Walton Kitchin, Jr., COLOMBO, KITCHIN, JOHNSON, DUNN & BALL, 

LLP, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-6058 Doc: 19 Filed: 08/12/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Paul Scinto, Sr., appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Scinto v. Preston, No. 4:03-cv-00178-H (E.D.N.C. May 28 

& Dec. 11, 2009). We grant Scinto’s motion to exceed length 

limitations for his informal brief. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-6058 Doc: 19 Filed: 08/12/2010 Pg: 2 of 2