Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00569/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00569-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 385
Nature of Suit: Property Damage - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK LUCIDO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NESTLE PURINA PET CARE COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-00569-EMC 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO STRIKE THE 

SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT 

OF DR. JENA QUESTEN

Docket No. 109

Defendant Nestle Purina Pet Care Company (“Purina”) has filed a motion to strike the 

supplemental expert report of Dr. Jena Questen. A hearing was held on the motion on September 

15, 2016. As the Court indicated at the hearing, Purina’s motion to strike is DENIED. However, 

the Court shall permit Purina to take a second deposition of Dr. Questen. The deposition shall be 

telephonic, shall be limited in subject matter to the new matters raised in the supplemental report, 

shall be no longer than (approximately) 90 minutes in length, and shall be taken no later than

September 22, 2016. Costs related to the deposition (other than attorney’s fees) shall be borne by 

Plaintiffs. Purina shall have until (1) three (3) days after the deposition to file its reply brief in 

support of its motion to exclude Dr. Questen (see Docket No. 110), or (2) by September 22, 2016, 

whichever is later. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 16, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00569-EMC Document 145 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 1