Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05585/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05585-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY CAMPBELL, SANDRA )

JEFFCOAT, NOLAN CAMPBELL, )

MARGARET CAMPBELL, ANTHONY )

CAMPBELL, JR., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. )

)

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, MARK )

CHARMLEY, SCOTT CARVEL, )

ORBIN LOVE, THOMAS PRYOR, )

JAMES JAMES, ERIC MATLOCK, and )

DOES 1-10 Individually and in their )

Official Capacities, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CIV F 04-5585 AWI TAG

ORDER EXTENDING TIME

TO FILE OPPOSITION TO

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

CHANGING CURRENT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE

In the Court’s June 19, 2006, order extending time for Plaintiffs to file an opposition to

summary judgment, the Court informed Plaintiffs that any opposition was to be filed with the

Court and served on Defendants on or by July 5, 2006. See Court’s Docket Doc. No. 47. On

July 5, 2006, Plaintiffs delivered to the Court for filing their opposition to Defendants’s motion

for summary judgment. The opposition was in a manilla folder and contained various marked

exhibits. Two documents were contained in the manilla folder that were not attached to any

other documents and were not exhibits. These two documents do not contain a required caption. 

See Local Rules 7-130; 5-133. Additionally, none of the documents submitted in connection

Case 1:04-cv-05585-AWI-TAG Document 57 Filed 07/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 daw 2

with Plaintiffs’s opposition contain a proof of service. See Local Rule 5-135(c). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The clerk is directed to return to Plaintiffs the two “loose,” unattached and

captionless documents; and

2. Plaintiffs are to immediately file a proof of service for the materials filed as their

opposition to summary judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 7, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05585-AWI-TAG Document 57 Filed 07/11/06 Page 2 of 2