Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00248/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00248-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIO SANDOVAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. LOPEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:23-cv-00248 JLT SKO (PC)

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTIONS FILED MARCH 31, 2023 AND 

APRIL 5, 2023

(Docs. 11 & 12)

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

1983. 

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On March 23, 2023, this Court issued its Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Request for 

Extension of Time Filed March 16, 2023. (Doc. 9.) Specifically, Plaintiff’s “Request for 

extension of time to Submit Motion for Clarification & objection” (Doc. 8) was partially granted. 

(Doc. 9 at 4.) Plaintiff was directed to file a document titled “Plaintiff’s Supplemental Submission 

Concerning The Imminent Danger Exception Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)” within 30 days of 

that order. (Id.)

On March 31, 2023, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Motion For Clarification.” (Doc. 

11.) On April 5, 2023, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Request For Extension of Pages.” (Doc. 

12.) 

Case 1:23-cv-00248-JLT-SKO Document 13 Filed 04/06/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

II. DISCUSSION AND ORDER

The Motion for Clarification

Plaintiff’s motion is signed and dated March 26, 2023. (See Doc. 11 at 2, 5.) It is clear 

from its content that Plaintiff had not yet received the Court’s March 23, 2023 order. 

Nevertheless, the Court’s March 23, 2023 order resolves Plaintiff’s “Motion for Clarification.” 

Therefore, it is moot.

The Request for Extension of Pages

Plaintiff asks the Court to allow him “fifteen more extra pages due to Exhibits taking up 

room ....” (See Doc. 12.) The Court presumes Plaintiff seeks the Court’s permission to exceed 

the 25-page limit as it concerns the supplemental filing he was directed to file in this Court’s 

March 23, 2023 order. Plaintiff will be permitted to file no more than 40 pages total. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff “Motion For Clarification” (Doc. 11) is DENIED as moot; and

2. Plaintiff’s “Request For Extension of Pages” (Doc. 12) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s 

anticipated filing, to be titled “Plaintiff’s Supplemental Submission Concerning The 

Imminent Danger Exception Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g),” shall exceed no more 

than 40 total pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 5, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:23-cv-00248-JLT-SKO Document 13 Filed 04/06/23 Page 2 of 2