Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00847/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00847-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOLOMON FARR,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0847 GEB DAD PS

vs.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled

action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On June 7, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings

and recommendations herein which contained notice to plaintiff

that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to

be filed within twenty days. 

Although plaintiff failed to file objections to the

findings and recommendations, it is unclear whether plaintiff has

been served with documents in this case. When plaintiff

Case 2:05-cv-00847-GEB-DAD Document 8 Filed 07/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

submitted his Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP

Application”) and his Complaint, each document had a different

address. The address in the IFP Application has been the address

used for service. Service should be attempted to the address on

Plaintiff’s Complaint.

Therefore, the Clerk of Court is ordered to re-serve

the Order filed April 29, 2005, at the address on plaintiff’s

Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 22, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00847-GEB-DAD Document 8 Filed 07/25/05 Page 2 of 2