Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03817/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03817-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\WHAALL\2006Civ\06-03817 Melzer\decl for motions to compel.wpd

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTIN MELZER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CNET NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 06-03817 WHA

ORDER RE BRIEFING IN

MOTION TO COMPEL

PRODUCTION OF THE 

SPECIAL COMMITTEE 

REPORT

In defendants’ opposition to plaintiff’s motion to compel production of the special

committee report, defendants’ counsel should include declarations sufficient to identify any

persons to whom the draft or final version of the special committee report was circulated. 

Defendants’ counsel should also state reasons why circulation to such people was within the

attorney-client privilege. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 27, 2006 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-03817-WHA Document 88 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 1