Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-2_05-cv-00551/USCOURTS-alnd-2_05-cv-00551-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

Plaintiff alleged in her first amended complaint that defendant Star Ring and Romance 1

Ring “is the entity that owns trademark ‘SR’ who manufactured the ring at issue . . . .” Doc. no.

23 at 2, ¶ 3. Defendant Star Ring, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss in lieu of an answer, stating that

it was incorrectly identified in the first amended complaint as “Star Ring/Romance Ring.” Doc.

no. 28 at 1. Defendant Kay Jewelers, a division of Sterling Jewelers, Inc., previously was

dismissed by separate order. See doc. no. 43 (Order).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ETHEL and WILLIAM PAYNE, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

vs. ) CASE NO. CV 05-TMP-551-S

)

KAY JEWELERS, a division of )

STERLING JEWELERS, INC.; )

STAR RING AND ROMANCE )

RING, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation on May 30, 2006,

recommending the dismissal without prejudice of all claims asserted in this action

against defendant Star Ring and Romance Ring on the basis that the court lacked

personal jurisdiction over it. To date, no objections to the report and 1

recommendation have been filed by any party.

Having reviewed and considered de novo all materials in the court file, the

court hereby ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS the recommendation of the

FILED

 2006 Jul-13 PM 03:18

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 2:05-cv-00551-TMP Document 45 Filed 07/13/06 Page 1 of 2
2

magistrate judge. Accordingly, all claims in this action against defendant Star Ring,

Inc. (incorrectly named Star Ring and Romance Ring) are hereby DISMISSED

without prejudice.

As there are no remaining defendants, this action is hereby DISMISSED.

DONE this 13th day of July, 2006.

______________________________

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00551-TMP Document 45 Filed 07/13/06 Page 2 of 2