Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01299/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01299-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT JABLONSKY, MD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

SIERRA KINGS HEALTH CARE )

DISTRICT, a California public Hospital )

District dba SIERRA KINGS DISTRICT )

HOSPITAL, CARROLL FRIEND, )

KATHLEEN OMACHI, and BARRY )

WARMERDAM, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F 06-1299 AWI LJO

ORDER GRANTING

STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS

Doc. # 35

This is a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C., section 1983 brought by plaintiff Dr.

Robert Jablonsky, MD (“Plaintiff”) against defendants Sierra Kings Healthcare District (“Sierra

Kings”) and individual defendants Carroll Friend, Kathleen Omachi, and Barry Warmerdam (the

“individual Defendants”) for damages resulting from the alleged wrongful revocation of

Plaintiff’s medical staff privileges. The currently operative pleading is the First Amended

Complaint (“FAC”), filed on March 5, 2007. Both Sierra Kings and the individual Defendants

have noticed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. 

On June 28, 2007, the parties stipulated to dismiss the FAC individual Defendants only. 

While the court makes no determination at this time as to the disposition of the motion to

Case 1:06-cv-01299-AWI-GSA Document 36 Filed 07/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

dismiss, the court recognizes the stipulated dismissal of the individual Defendants moots the

pending motion to dismiss to the extent the motion to dismiss incorporates arguments of absolute

and qualified immunity by the individual Defendants.

THEREFORE, consistent with the stipulation of the parties to this action, the First

Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as to the individual Defendants only. 

All fees and costs incurred by any individual Defendant party shall remain the obligation of the

party incurring such fees or costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 28, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01299-AWI-GSA Document 36 Filed 07/02/07 Page 2 of 2