Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03646/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03646-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC 

and MCM PORTFOLIO LLC, 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

 v. 

CANON, INC. et al., 

 Defendants. 

________________________________/ 

No. C 14-3640 CW 

ORDER AMENDING 

ORDER CONSTRUING 

DISPUTED CLAIM 

TERMS 

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC 

and MCM PORTFOLIO LLC, 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

 v. 

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, 

 Defendant. 

________________________________/ 

No. C 14-3643 CW 

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC 

and MCM PORTFOLIO LLC, 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

 v. 

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

________________________________/ 

No. C 14-3646 CW 

On September 18, 2015, the Court issued the Order Construing 

Disputed Claim Terms of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,719,847; 7,522,424; and 

7,295,443. In that order, the Court construed two terms as 

follows: 

Case 4:14-cv-03646-CW Document 132 Filed 11/04/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Term Court's Construction 

6. "memory media card" "a removable device capable of 

storing electronic data" 

7. "type of memory [media] card" "subset of memory media cards 

containing different numbers of 

contact pins or using contact 

pins differently" 

On October 2, 2015, Plaintiffs Technology Properties Limited 

LLC and MCM Portfolio LLC filed a Motion for Leave to File Motion 

for Reconsideration on the construction of two terms: "type of 

memory [media] card" and "memory media card." Pursuant to the 

Court's October 29, 2015 Order, Defendants responded that they did 

not object to modifying the terms as construed below. 

The Court amends the two constructions above as follows: 

Term Court's Construction 

6. "memory media card" "a removable device in card form 

that is capable of storing 

electronic data" 

7. "type of memory [media] card" "subset of memory media cards 

that use different numbers of 

contact pins or use contact pins 

differently" 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: November 4, 2015 

CLAUDIA WILKEN 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:14-cv-03646-CW Document 132 Filed 11/04/15 Page 2 of 2