Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00285/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00285-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARLIS RUBEN AUGUSTUS 

HOWARD,

Plaintiff,

v.

AYLANA OLIVIA PARKS, et al.,

 Defendants.

No. 1:24-cv-00285-JLT-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS 

CERTAIN CLAIMS

(Doc. 29)

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

The assigned magistrate judge recommended this action proceed only on Plaintiff’s failure 

to protect and negligence claims against Defendant Rodriguez, and all other claims and 

Defendants be dismissed from the action. (Doc. 14.) The Court served the Findings and 

Recommendations on the plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. 

(Id. at 13.)1 The Court advised him that the “failure to file objections within the specified time 

may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 

1 On July 22, 2024, the Court received a notice of change of address from Plaintiff, which indicated Plaintiff had 

been moved within Avenal state prison. (Doc. 15) The postal mailing address used by the Court, however, did not 

change. 

Case 1:24-cv-00285-JLT-SAB Document 16 Filed 08/01/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so has passed. 

According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court performed a de novo review of this 

case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and 

Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on July 3, 2024 (Doc. 14) are ADOPTED

in full. 

2. This action PROCEEDS only on Plaintiff’s failure to protect and negligence claims 

against Defendant Rodriguez. 

3. The remaining claims against any Defendant are DISMISSED. 

4. The matter is referred to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 1, 2024 

Case 1:24-cv-00285-JLT-SAB Document 16 Filed 08/01/24 Page 2 of 2