Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01966/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01966-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Curtis Boyd is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

This action is proceeding against Defendants Etchebehere, J. Ojeda, F. Cote, J. Gallagher, B. 

Odle, D. Perkins, D. Hetebrink, and R. Guembe for violation of Plaintiff’s rights to free exercise of his 

religion.1 

On December 22, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel. On January 5, 2016, Defendant 

filed a partial-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 58.) Plaintiff filed a reply on 

January 27, 2016. (ECF No. 59.) 

///

///

 

1

Defendants J. Ojeda, F. Cote, J. Gallagher, B. Odle, D. Perkins, D. Hetebrink, and R. Guembe have not yet been served. 

CURTIS BOYD,

 Plaintiff,

v.

C. ETCHEBEHERE,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:13-01966-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE A 

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S REPLY, FILED 

JANUARY 27, 2016

[ECF No. 59]

Case 1:13-cv-01966-LJO-SAB Document 60 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In order to appropriately address Plaintiff’s motion to compel and the contentions raised in his 

reply, the Court directs Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff’s reply within fifteen (15) days from 

the date of service of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01966-LJO-SAB Document 60 Filed 01/29/16 Page 2 of 2