Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02226/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02226-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 690
Nature of Suit: Other Forfeiture and Penalty Suits
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Ten (10) Firearms, Eleven (11) Rounds of

Ammunition; and $32,760.00 in U.S.

Currency. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-2226-PHX-LOA

ORDER

This matter arises upon the Court’s review of Claimants’ attorney’s Response

to OSC/Motion to Withdraw. (docket # 18) Because the Response/Motion does not bear the

written signatures of his clients, Claimants’ attorney must properly comply with LRCiv

83.3(b)(2). Specifically, any motion to withdraw not bearing the written signatures of an

attorney’s client must 

. . . be accompanied by a certificate of the attorney making the motion

that (A) the client has been notified in writing of the status of the case

including the dates and times of any court hearings or trial settings,

pending compliance with any existing court orders and the possibility

of sanctions, or (B) the client cannot be located or for whatever other

reason cannot be notified of the pendency of the motion and the status

of the case [and]

shall include a mailing certificate that a copy of the withdrawal motion was mailed to the

clients’ last known address. LRCiv 83.3(b)(2). Upon the prompt filing of an amended

Case 2:07-cv-02226-LOA Document 19 Filed 03/27/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

motion to withdraw that complies in all aspects with this order and LRCiv 83.3(b)(2), the

motion will be granted.

IT IS ORDERED that the Claimants’ attorney’s Motion to Withdraw, docket

# 18, is DENIED without prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause against

Claimants and Attorney Alejandro E. Muñoz is hereby DISCHARGED. 

DATED this 27th day of March, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02226-LOA Document 19 Filed 03/27/08 Page 2 of 2