Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00530/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00530-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDEL SADSAD SANTOS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0530 LKK DAD P

vs.

KUMA J. DEBOO, et al., 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

By order filed May 9, 2007, petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad

subjiciendum was dismissed and thirty days’ leave to file a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct

his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was granted. The time period has now expired, and

petitioner has not filed his § 2255 petition or otherwise responded to the court’s order. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)

and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 26, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner

has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

/////

Case 2:07-cv-00530-LKK -DAD Document 12 Filed 08/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the findings and

recommendations were returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s

responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local

Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 26, 2007, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED: August 16, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-00530-LKK -DAD Document 12 Filed 08/16/07 Page 2 of 2