Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01138/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01138-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMAAL THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTIPOV, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:11-cv-01138-MCE-EFB P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On August 3, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Despite multiple 

extensions of time granted to plaintiff, neither party has filed objections to the findings and 

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 3, 2016, are adopted in full.

Case 2:11-cv-01138-MCE-EFB Document 163 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a second settlement conference (ECF No. 147) is denied without 

prejudice.

3. Plaintiff is granted 30 days in which to file a new motion for a second settlement 

conference with Judge Newman. Such a motion must describe the portions of the agreement 

plaintiff does not understand and indicate that plaintiff has discussed those portions with defense 

counsel prior to filing the motion.

4. Ruling on defendants’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement (ECF No. 149) is 

deferred until the resolution of the new motion for a second settlement conference filed by 

plaintiff or the date on which the time for filing such a motion passes.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2017

Case 2:11-cv-01138-MCE-EFB Document 163 Filed 01/06/17 Page 2 of 2