Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04518/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04518-37/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD SIEMERS, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WELLS FARGO & CO.,WELLS FARGO

FUNDS MANAGEMENT, LLC, WELLS

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., H.D.

VEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, WELLS

FARGO INVESTMENTS, LLC, STEPHENS,

INC., and WELLS FARGO FUNDS TRUST,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-04518 WHA

ORDER RE REPLY BRIEFS

In the order to show cause why the tentative order should not be made final, the Court

limited the number of pages that the parties may file in their memoranda due on March 5. 

Plaintiff has ignored the Court’s directive and filed its memorandum with appendices. 

Therefore, plaintiff’s reply brief shall be limited to three pages. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 5, 2007. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-04518-WHA Document 243 Filed 03/05/07 Page 1 of 1