Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00525/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00525-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DURRELL A. PUCKETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

SGT. RONALD VOGEL, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:13-cv-00525-AWI-SKO (PC)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO 

FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF 

NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

(Doc. 27)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Durrell A. Puckett, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 12, 2013. On April 8, 2016, 

Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Doc. 97.) The Second Informational 

Order issued on April 12, 2016, notifying Plaintiff of the requirement to file an opposition or 

statement of non-opposition within 21 days of service of that order. (Doc. 102.) An unsuccessful 

settlement conference was held on May 5, 2016. (Docs. 103, 112.) Plaintiff has not filed an 

opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion despite lapse of the requisite time and 

must do so if he desires to pursue this action further. Local Rule 230(l). 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ 

motion for judgment on the pleadings within twenty-one (21) days from the date 

of service of this order; and

Case 1:13-cv-00525-AWI-SKO Document 120 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in 

recommendation that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, for his failure 

both to obey this Court’s order and to prosecute this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 1, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00525-AWI-SKO Document 120 Filed 06/01/16 Page 2 of 2