Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06423/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06423-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

AMEND COMPLAINT AND EXTEND TIME IN 

WHICH DEFENDANTS MAY RESPOND 

Case No. C 06-06423 MJJ 

SV1:\259522\02\5k8y02!.DOC\53791.0003

MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795) 

matthew.powers@weil.com 

CHRISTOPHER J. COX (Bar No. 151650) 

chris.cox@weil.com 

JEFFREY G. HOMRIG (Bar No. 215890) 

jeffrey.homrig@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Silicon Valley Office 

201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Telephone: (650) 802-3000 

Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

INGENIO, INC. 

JOANNA S. ESTY 

jesty@linerlaw.com 

LINER, YANKELEVITZ, ET AL 

111 Glendon Ave., 14th Fl. 

Los Angeles, CA 90024 

Telephone: (310) 500-3596 

Facsimile: (310) 500-3501 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ACACIA PATENT ACQUISITION 

CORPORATION and ACACIA RESEARCH 

CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

INGENIO, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

ACACIA PATENT ACQUISITION 

CORPORATION, ACACIA RESEARCH 

CORPORATION, and CREDIT FRAUD 

CONTROL CORPORATION 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 06-06423 MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO AMEND COMPLAINT 

AND EXTEND TIME IN WHICH 

DEFENDANTS MAY RESPOND TO 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Case 3:06-cv-06423-MJJ Document 8 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 30 Case 3:06-cv-06423-MJJ Document 9 Filed 11/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

AMEND COMPLAINT AND EXTEND TIME IN 

WHICH DEFENDANTS MAY RESPOND 2

Case No. C 06-06423 MJJ. 

SV1:\259522\02\5k8y02!.DOC\53791.0003

On October 13, 2006, Ingenio filed its original Complaint for declaratory judgment 

naming Acacia Patent Acquisition Corporation and Acacia Research Corporation as defendants. 

On October 17, 2006, Ingenio amended its complaint to add Credit Fraud Control 

Corporation as a defendant, which is a company identified on the United States Patent and 

Trademark Office website as an assignee of the patent-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 6,282,276. 

On November 8, 2006, defendants advised Ingenio that the correct name of the 

assignee is Credit Card Fraud Control Corporation. 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties that Ingenio may amend 

its complaint in the form of Exhibit A to correct the name of defendant Credit Card Fraud Control 

Corporation. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that defendants shall have up to 

and including December 8, 2006, in which to Answer or otherwise respond to Ingenio’s Second 

Amended Complaint. This order does not affect any other dates. 

Dated: November 9, 2006 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

By: /s/ Christopher J. Cox

Christopher J. Cox 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INGENIO, INC. 

Dated: November 9, 2006 LINER, YANKELEVITZ ET AL 

By: /s/ JoAnna S. Esty

JoAnna S. Esty 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ACACIA PATENT ACQUISITION 

CORPORATION and ACACIA 

RESEARCH CORPORATION 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: 

 The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-06423-MJJ Document 8 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 2 of 30

11/14/2006

Case 3:06-cv-06423-MJJ Document 9 Filed 11/14/06 Page 2 of 2