Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01447/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01447-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Christopher Herrera, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-1447-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Civil Rights Complaint filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Marshall for Report

and Recommendation. On January 18, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and

Recommendation with this Court. To date, no objections have been filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When reviewing a Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, this Court “must

make a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made,”

and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations

made by the Magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d

1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991) (citing Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

(9th Cir. 1983)). Failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s recommendation relieves the Court

of conducting de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings. Orand v. United

Case 2:06-cv-01447-SMM Document 14 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

States, 602 F.2d 207 (9th Cir. 1979) (citing Campbell v. United States Dist. Court, 501 F.2d

196 (9th Cir. 1974)); see also Barilla v. Ervin, 886 F.2d 1514 (9th Cir. 1989) (overruled on

other grounds). A failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s conclusion “is a factor to be

weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal.” Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Baxter, 923 F.2d at 1394; Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 1991) (citing McCall v. Andrus, 628 F.2d 1185, 1187 (9th Cir.

1980)).

DISCUSSION

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge Jacqueline

Marshall, and no objections having been made by Plaintiff thereto, the Court hereby

incorporates and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. 

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

For the reasons set forth, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 12).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE, terminating this case.

DATED this 22nd day of February, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-01447-SMM Document 14 Filed 02/23/07 Page 2 of 2