Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-06231/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-06231-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO CORTEZ BUCKLEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

STEPHEN M WAGSTAFFE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-06231-DMR 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO AMEND 

THE COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 16

On May 10, 2016, the court issued an Order Dismissing the Case and granting Plaintiff 

leave to amend the complaint by May 24, 2016. [Docket No. 12.] The Order stated that failure to 

timely amend the complaint may result in dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute the 

case. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint by May 24, 2016. Accordingly, on May 26, 

2016, the court issued an Order Dismissing the Case without Prejudice for Failure to Prosecute 

and a Judgment and closed the case file. [Docket Nos. 14 and 15.] 

On May 31, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to amend his complaint, 

stating that the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People has accepted his case 

and would appoint him a lawyer within a week. [Docket No. 16.] Plaintiff’s case has already 

been closed and a judgment has been entered. As the case is now closed, the court will not 

respond to further submissions filed under this case number. 

However, Plaintiff’s case was dismissed without prejudice and he is free to file a new case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 3, 2016

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:15-cv-06231-DMR Document 17 Filed 06/03/16 Page 1 of 1