Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00349/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00349-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

Case No. CV-F-07-00349-LJO-SMS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TODD SCHWEGEL 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Jeffrey S. Schoppert – SBN 116674 

Wendy L. Wyse – SBN 068284 

KEEGIN HARRISON SCHOPPERT 

 SMITH & KARNER LLP

1000 Fourth Street, Suite 600 

San Rafael, California 94901 

Telephone: (415) 456-4000 

Facsimile: (415) 456-1921 

Attorneys for Defendant Todd Schwegel 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(Fresno Division) 

CARGILL INCORPORATED and 

CAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

PROGRESSIVE DAIRY SOLUTIONS, 

INC.; DIVERSIFIED DAIRY 

SOLUTIONS, LLC; MATTHEW 

BUDINE; DOUGLAS DEGROFF; 

LUCIANA JONKMAN; TODD 

SCHWEGEL; and BRIAN SUNDBERG, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-F-07-00349-LJO-SMS 

STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR AN 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT TODD SCHWEGEL 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

ORDER 

Plaintiffs CARGILL INCORPORATED and CAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant TODD SCHWEGEL hereby apply for, by 

stipulation, and respectfully request that the Court enter the following Proposed Order: 

WHEREAS Defendant Todd Schwegel was served with Plaintiffs’ complaint in this 

action on March 2, 2007, making March 22, 2007 the initial deadline for Mr. Schwegel to 

respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint; 

WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendant Todd Schwegel stipulated to extend the 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00349-LJO-SMS Document 63 Filed 04/17/07 Page 1 of 2
Case No. CV-F-07-00349-LJO-SMS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TODD SCHWEGEL 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

deadline for Defendant Todd Schwegel to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ 

complaint to April 16, 2007, which was an extension of less than 30 days; 

WHEREAS the Court ordered such extension; 

WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendant Todd Schwegel agree that good cause exists 

for Defendant Todd Schwegel to be granted an additional extension of fourteen (14) days, 

to May 1, 2007, to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that, subject to Court approval, the 

deadline for Defendant Todd Schwegel to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ 

complaint is extended to May 1, 2007. 

Dated: April 16, 2007 KEEGIN HARRISON SCHOPPERT 

 SMITH & KARNER LLP 

 By /s/ Wendy L. Wyse 

 Wendy L. Wyse 

 Attorneys for Defendant Todd Schwegel 

Dated: April 16, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

 By /s/ Enrique Duarte 

 as authorized on April 16, 2007 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

CARGILL INCORPORATED and 

CAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:__4/17/2007 

 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

The Honorable Sandra M. Snyder 

 United States District Court 

 Eastern District of California 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00349-LJO-SMS Document 63 Filed 04/17/07 Page 2 of 2