Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02445/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02445-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Property Damage

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, et 

al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:09-CV-02445 JAM-EFB

ORDER DENYING SIERRA PACIFIC 

INDUSTRIES’ MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION OF MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE BRENNAN’S RECUSAL ORDER

Defendant Sierra Pacific Industries (SPI) has filed its 

“Motion for Reconsideration of Recusal Order” (Doc # 106). 

Plaintiff has filed its opposition to this Motion (Doc # 111).

In accordance with Local Rule 303(f), 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) 

and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of this matter. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

the Court finds Magistrate Judge Brennan’s Recusal Order (Doc # 91) 

to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. There is 

nothing in the Recusal Order that is clearly erroneous or contrary 

to law.

Case 2:09-cv-02445-WBS-AC Document 114 Filed 12/07/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SPI’s Motion for 

Reconsideration of Recusal Order is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 6, 2010

Case 2:09-cv-02445-WBS-AC Document 114 Filed 12/07/10 Page 2 of 2