Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01820/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01820-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Aaron Mayorquin-Veron, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 05-1820-PHX-EHC (MEA)

ORDER

On June 16, 2005, Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging

claims based on overcrowding, unsanitary conditions, and improper storage and

preparation of food. [Dkt. 1]. On July 29, 2005, the Court ordered service on Defendant

Arpaio. [Dkt. 4]. The July 29, 2005 Order was returned to the Clerk of Court as undeliverable

to Plaintiff. The returned mail indicated that Plaintiff had been released. 

On September 30, 2005, Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey ordered Plaintiff to show

cause, by October 21, 2005, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to provide

the Court will a Notice of Address Change and for failure to timely serve Defendant Arpaio.

[Dkt. 7]. The October 21, 2005 Order was returned to the Clerk of Court as undeliverable.

Plaintiff has not responded to the Order to Show Cause.

On October 31, 2005, Magistrate Judge Asp ey issued a Report and Recommendation,

recommending t he dismissal of this case. [Dkt. 9]. Plaintiff's copy of the Report and

Recommendation was returned to the Clerk of Court as undeliverable. Plaintiff has not filed

a Response or Objection to the Report and Recommendation. 

Case 2:05-cv-01820-EHC Document 11 Filed 01/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

A district court judge reviews de novo the Report and Recommendation of a Magistrate

Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

The Court having reviewed the record de novo, adopts in full the Report and

Recommendation of t he M agistrate Judge and incorporates the same as a part of this

Order.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is

adopted in full. [Dkt. 9].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint [Dkt. 1] is DISMIS S ED without

prejudice.

DATED this 10th day of January, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-01820-EHC Document 11 Filed 01/10/06 Page 2 of 2