Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04692/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04692-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

FOR SUR-REPLY AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO QUASH

OR FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. C08-04692 MMC (JL)

Gordon

&

Rees L

L

P

2

75 B

attery

Street, S

uite 2

0

0

0

S

a

n

Fra

ncisco, C

A 94111

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GORDON ERSPAMER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP LONG

TERM DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C08-04692 MMC (JL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION FOR SUR-REPLY AND FOR

ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR A

PROTECTIVE ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Administrative Motion for Sur-Reply

and for Oral Argument on Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash or For a Protective Order (“Defendant’s

Administrative Motion”). The Court, Magistrate Judge Larson presiding, having considered the

parties’ respective briefs, and the supporting declarations and exhibits, hereby orders that

Defendant’s Administrative Motion be GRANTED.

The Court grants Defendant the opportunity to file a Sur-Reply in Opposition to

Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash or For a Protective Order (“Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash”). Such Sur-

///

///

PRU/1054181/8073555v.1

Case 3:08-cv-04692-MMC Document 106 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-04692-MMC Document104 Filed06/18/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

FOR SUR-REPLY AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO QUASH

OR FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. C08-04692 MMC (JL)

Gordon

&

Rees L

L

P

2

75 B

attery

Street, S

uite 2

0

0

0

S

a

n

Fra

ncisco, C

A 94111

2

Reply must be filed no later than June 28, 2010. Additionally, the Court grants Defendant’s

request for oral argument at the hearing on June 30, 2010 on Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June ______, 2010

James Larson

United States Magistrate Judge

Northern District of California

Case 3:08-cv-04692-MMC Document 106 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 2 Case3:08-cv-04692-MMC Document104 Filed06/18/10 Page2 of 2