Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04113/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04113-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 460
Nature of Suit: Deportation
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUHAMMAD YOUNAS MALIK,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-4113 MMC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; DIRECTING

SERVICE

On November 16, 2007, plaintiff failed to appear as ordered at the scheduled Case

Management Conference.

The Court also notes that plaintiff has failed to provide proof that he has properly

served any defendant with a copy of the summons and complaint. This action was filed on

August 9, 1007. Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff is

required to serve defendant no later than December 7, 2007. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m)

(requiring service within 120 days of filing complaint).

Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:

1. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, filed no later than December 7, 2007, why

this action should not be dismissed for his failure to appear at the Case Management

Conference.

2. Plaintiff shall serve each defendant with the summons and a copy of the

complaint and shall file proof of such service no later than December 7, 2007.

Case 3:07-cv-04113-MMC Document 8 Filed 11/19/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

3. If plaintiff fails to show cause as ordered, the action will be dismissed without

prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute; if, as to any defendant, plaintiff

fails to provide proof of service as ordered, the action will be dismissed without prejudice

pursuant to Rule 4(m) as to such defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 19, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-04113-MMC Document 8 Filed 11/19/07 Page 2 of 2