Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01723/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01723-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIENE D. DAVIS, et al., No. 2:05-cv-1723-MCE-GGH-PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

On January 13, 2006, the magistrate judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice that any Objections to the Findings and

Recommendations were to be filed within ten (10) days. No

Objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the Court presumes any findings of fact are

correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th

Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

Case 2:05-cv-01723-MCE -GGH Document 12 Filed 03/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and,

good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt

the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed January

13, 2006, are ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local

Rule 11-110 (E.D. Cal. 1997); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED: March 7, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:05-cv-01723-MCE -GGH Document 12 Filed 03/08/06 Page 2 of 2