Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00869/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00869-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OMAR JEFFERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CDCR, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00869 AWI-SAB-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF No.11)

ORDER REFERRING ACTION TO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR SERVICE OF 

PROCESS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On August 4, 2015, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that this 

action proceed against Defendant Knuckles on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect 

claim. The Magistrate Judge recommended that all remaining claims and defendants be 

dismissed from this. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. 

To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and 

recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the record to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Case 1:14-cv-00869-AWI-SAB Document 13 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on August 4, 

2015, are adopted in full;

2. This action proceeds against Defendant Sergeant Knuckles on Plaintiff’s Eighth

Amendment failure to protect claim;

3. Plaintiff’s claim for failure to summon medical assistance is dismissed for failure

to state a claim upon which may be granted under §1983;

4. Defendants CDCR, Sgt. J. Kohler, C/O Gonzalez-Moran and C/O G. Sandoval

are dismissed from this action based on Plaintiff’s failure to state any claims upon

which relief may be granted against them; and

5. This action is referred to the Magistrate Judge for service of process upon

Defendant Knuckles.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 30, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 1:14-cv-00869-AWI-SAB Document 13 Filed 09/30/15 Page 2 of 2