Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00257/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00257-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA T. LOLMAUGH,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; COUNTY OF

SACRAMENTO, SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;

DEPUTY DOES 1-100; DOES 1-100,

Defendants.

CIV S-06-0257 GEB PAN PS

ORDER 

-o0oOn February 6, 2006, plaintiff filed a proposed complaint

and an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915.

Plaintiff’s application is incomplete. Plaintiff failed

fully to answer Question 3–while he described the sources of

money he has received in the past twelve months, he did not

“state the amount you receive and what you expect you will

continue to receive.” Additionally, plaintiff’s answer to

Case 2:06-cv-00257-GEB-EFB Document 3 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Question 4 is ambiguous–he states he does not have any cash or

checking or savings accounts but then provides the amount $450.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s application is denied. Within

20 days of service of this order, plaintiff may file a complete

application for this court’s consideration. If plaintiff fails

timely to submit a new application, the Clerk of Court is

directed to close this file.

So ordered.

Dated: February 10, 2006. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00257-GEB-EFB Document 3 Filed 02/10/06 Page 2 of 2