Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05508/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05508-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOWELL FINLEY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GAIL LEWIS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05508-REC-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 65)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Doc. 50)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT (Doc. 54)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff Jowell Finley (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On October 21, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

Case 1:04-cv-05508-REC-LJO Document 67 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

days. On November 4, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations. Defendants did

not file a response.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 21,

2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed July 5,

2005, is DENIED;

3. Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment, filed

August 23, 2005, is GRANTED; and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for

defendants and against plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05508-REC-LJO Document 67 Filed 12/20/05 Page 2 of 2