Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-01334/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-01334-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Case No. C13-1334 HRL ADR

STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON

THOMAS W. BURCH, III (SBN 257917)

tburch@dehay.com 

AMBER R. CRAIG (SBN 268421)

acraig@dehay.com 

DEHAY & ELLISTON, L.L.P.

1111 Broadway, Suite 1950

Oakland, CA 94607

Telephone: (510) 285-0750

Facsimile: (510) 285-0740

ROBERT E. SCOTT, JR. 

(admitted pro hac vice on July 25, 2013)

rscott@semmes.com

MARISA A. TRASATTI 

(admitted pro hac vice on July 24, 2013)

mtrasatti@semmes.com

SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES

25 S. Charles Street, Suite 1400

Baltimore, Maryland 21201

Telephone: (410) 539-5040

Facsimile: (410) 539-5223 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

SCITON, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SCITON, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 

v. 

CLARION MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES 

INC., and DOES 1-100, inclusive,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

Civil Action No.: C13-1334 HRL ADR

Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd

STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION RE 

DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER

THEREON

[Fed. R. Civ. P 41(a)(2)]

 

COME NOW Plaintiff Sciton, Inc. (hereinafter “Sciton”) and Defendant Clarion Medical 

Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter “Clarion”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their

attorneys of record, and in accordance with the Order of this Court dated November 25, 2014 

(ECF No. 45), hereby file this Status Report and Stipulation re Dismissal, and state as follows:

[Re: Dkt. 47]

Case 5:13-cv-01334-HRL Document 48 Filed 01/28/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 Case No. C13-1334 HRL ADR

STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON

1. The Parties participated in a binding arbitration/mediation (hereinafter “Arb/Med”) 

on January 22, 2015 through January 23, 2015, in order to resolve this matter. 

2. On January 23, 2015, the Parties reached a settlement in principle which fully and 

finally disposed of all claims and counterclaims asserted by the Parties in this action. 

3. The Parties are in the process of circulating closing papers and effectuating the 

terms of the settlement agreement. 

4. Certain material terms of the settlement agreement will not be fully effectuated 

until April 23, 2015, and therefore the Parties request that this case be dismissed now without 

prejudice to the right of either Sciton or Clarion to move for good cause within 90 days to reopen 

this action solely to seek further appropriate relief to enforce the terms of the settlement if the 

settlement is not consummated. The Parties stipulate and agree that if no party moves to reopen 

this case within 90 days, the dismissal shall automatically be deemed to be with prejudice.

5. Counsel has conferred and all Parties have stipulated to the requested relief. 

WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that this Court enter an order dismissing 

this case without prejudice for either Sciton or Clarion to move for good cause within 90 days to 

reopen this action solely to seek further appropriate relief to enforce the terms of the settlement if 

the settlement is not consummated, as set forth above.

A proposed Order is attached.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 5:13-cv-01334-HRL Document 48 Filed 01/28/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 Case No. C13-1334 HRL ADR

STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON

Dated: January 27, 2015 DEHAY & ELLISTON LLP

By: //ss// Thomas W. Burch, III

THOMAS W. BURCH, III

AMBER R. CRAIG

SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES

By: _//ss// Robert E. Scott___________

ROBERT E. SCOTT, JR. 

(pro hac vice granted on July 25, 2013)

MARISA A. TRASATTI 

(pro hac vice granted on July 24, 2013)

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 

SCITON, INC.

 THEODORA ORINGHER PC

By: _//ss// Allan L. Schare____________ 

 ALLAN L. SCHARE, (SBN 126305)

 Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,

 CLARION MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case 5:13-cv-01334-HRL Document 48 Filed 01/28/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 Case No. C13-1334 HRL ADR

STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON

ORDER

The Court having considered the Status Report and Stipulation re Dismissal by the Parties 

hereto, and having been advised by the Parties that the above action has been settled, including all 

counterclaims, Now, Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. This action is hereby dismissed and each Party is to bear its own costs. 

2. The entry of this Order is without prejudice to the right of either Party to move for 

good cause within 90 days of the entry of this Order to reopen this action solely to seek further 

appropriate relief to enforce the terms of the settlement if the settlement is not consummated. 

3. If no party moves to reopen, then the dismissal of this action, including all claims 

and counterclaims by and between the Parties, shall automatically be deemed to be with prejudice.

DATED: January___, 2015 _________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

and the court retains jurisdiction over this matter for that purpose. 28

Case 5:13-cv-01334-HRL Document 48 Filed 01/28/15 Page 4 of 4