Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00262/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00262-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. 1

Case Number C 10-262 JF (HRL)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND

(JFEX1)

**E-Filed 6/17/10**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

STEVEN SIMON, MICHAEL KALLOCK AND

ALEXEY TERSKIKH, on Behalf of Himself and

All Others Similarly Situated,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

ERIC STANG, LEN DEBENEDICTIS, HANK

GAUTHIER, and RELIANT TECHNOLOGIES,

INC.,

 Defendants.

Case Number C 10-00262 JF (HRL)

ORDER GRANTING 1

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO

REMAND

[re doc. no. 11]

Plaintiffs Steven Simon, Michael Kallok, and Alexey Terskikh (collectively,

“Plaintiffs”) filed this putative class action in the Santa Clara Superior Court on December 12,

2009. Pursuant to the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”), 15

U.S.C. §§ 77p, 78bb, Defendants Eric Stang, Len Debenedictis, Hank Gautheir, and Reliant

Technologies, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) removed the action to this Court. Plaintiffs

Case 5:10-cv-00262-JF Document 30 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case Number C 10-262 JF (HRL)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND

(JFEX1)

moved to remand, and Defendants moved to dismiss. On April 12, the Court concluded that

some of Plaintiffs’ claims were precluded by SLUSA and granted in part Defendants’ motion to

dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffs were granted leave to amend to avoid inadvertently pled

federal claims. The Court deferred determination of Plaintiffs’ motion for remand pending

Plaintiffs’ amendment.

On May 5, 2010, Plaintiffs requested consideration of their motion for remand and

provided a copy of the first amended complaint. On May 28, 2010, Defendants submitted a

statement of non-opposition to Plaintiffs’ renewed request to remand. Good cause therefor

appearing, the motion to remand will be granted. The Clerk shall transmit the file to the Santa

Clara Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: 6/7/2010

 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00262-JF Document 30 Filed 06/17/10 Page 2 of 2