Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03805/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03805-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 13-cv-03805 NC

ORDER PERMITTING RESPONSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID M. CURLEY, SR.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

WELLS FARGO & CO., and others,

 Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-03805 NC

ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF 

TO FILE OBJECTION OR 

RESPONSE TO EVIDENCE IN 

DOCKET NUMBERS 125, 126-1 

Re: Dkt. Nos. 125, 126-1

With its reply brief, Wells Fargo has submitted additional evidence in support of its 

summary judgment motion. Dkt. No. 125 (exhibit “inadvertently left off” initial motion); 

Dkt. No. 126-1 (supplemental declaration of E. Manukyan). Plaintiff David Curley may 

object or respond to this evidence by July 13 in a brief not to exceed three pages in length.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: July 7, 2015

_________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-03805-NC Document 127 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 1