Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04435/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04435-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

Farella Braun & Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 954-4400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

21447\1157859.1

Stipulation And [Proposed] Confidentiality Order 

Court Case No. C 06-04435 CRB 

Douglas R. Young (State Bar No. 073248) 

William P. Keane (State Bar No. 124756) 

James C. Mann (State Bar No. 221603) 

Farella Braun + Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 954-4400 

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 

Email: dyoung@fbm.com 

 wkeane@fbm.com 

 jmann@fbm.com 

Attorneys for Third-Party 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GREGORY L. REYES, STEPHANIE 

JENSEN and ANTONIO CANOVA, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 06-04435 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER 

Dept.: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor 

Judge: Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

 

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

In order to protect the confidentiality of confidential information subpoenaed by 

defendants Gregory L. Reyes and Stephanie Jensen in this case, Plaintiff Securities & Exchange 

Commission; Defendants Gregory L. Reyes, Stephanie Jensen, and Antonio Canova; and ThirdParties Morrison & Foerster LLP, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), and Brocade 

Communications Systems, Inc. (“Brocade”) hereby agree as follows: 

1. Morrison & Foerster and PwC may designate as “confidential” (by stamping the 

relevant page or as otherwise set forth herein) any document or response to a subpoena which it 

considers in good faith to contain: (i) information involving trade secrets, or confidential 

business or financial information, subject to protection under the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure or California law; or (ii) confidential information of a person that is protected by a 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 161 Filed 02/27/07 Page 1 of 8
Farella Braun & Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 954-4400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 21447\1157859.1

Stipulation And [Proposed] Confidentiality Order 

Court Case No. C 06-04435 CRB 

right of privacy under applicable law. Where a document or response consists of more than one 

page, the first page and each page on which confidential information appears shall be so 

designated. 

2. Morrison & Foerster and PwC may designate information disclosed during a 

deposition as “confidential” by so indicating on the record at the deposition and requesting the 

preparation of a separate transcript of such material. Additionally, Morrison & Foerster and PwC 

may designate in writing, within twenty (20) days after receipt of the deposition transcript for 

which the designation is proposed, that specific pages of the transcript be treated as “confidential” 

information. Any party may object to such proposal in writing or on the record. Upon such 

objection, the procedures described in paragraph 7 below shall be followed. After any 

designation made according to the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated 

documents or information shall be treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved 

according to the procedures described in paragraph 7 below. 

3. All information produced by Morrison & Foerster and PwC in the course of this 

case (other than information that is publicly available) shall be used solely for the purpose of this 

case and any related civil or criminal proceeding currently pending. 

4. Except with the prior written consent of Morrison & Foerster or PwC, or upon 

prior order of this Court obtained upon notice to Morrison & Foerster and PwC, anything 

designated as confidential pursuant to the terms of this Order (“Confidential Information”) shall 

not be disclosed to any person other than: 

(a) counsel for the respective parties to this litigation who have agreed to be 

bound by the terms of this Order, including defendants’ counsel and 

counsel for the Securities and Exchange Commission; 

(b) employees of such counsel; 

(c) individual defendants, to the extent deemed necessary by counsel for the 

prosecution or defense of this litigation; 

(d) consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of 

this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 161 Filed 02/27/07 Page 2 of 8
Farella Braun & Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 954-4400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 - 21447\1157859.1

Stipulation And [Proposed] Confidentiality Order 

Court Case No. C 06-04435 CRB 

Certification annexed to this Order (which shall be retained by counsel to 

the party so disclosing the Confidential Information and made available for 

inspection during the pendency or after the termination of the action upon 

good cause shown and upon order of the Court) before being shown or 

given any Confidential Information and provided that if the party chooses a 

consultant or expert employed by one of Brocade’s competitors or 

customers, the party shall notify Brocade before disclosing any 

Confidential Information to that individual and shall give Brocade an 

opportunity to move for a protective order preventing or limiting such 

disclosure; 

(e) any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information; 

(f) the Court, Court personnel and court reporters; and 

(g) witnesses, at deposition and/or trial, only to the extent necessary to give 

their testimony. At the request of any party, the portion of the transcript 

involving the Confidential Information shall be designated “Confidential” 

pursuant to paragraph 2 above. Witnesses shown Confidential 

Information shall not be allowed to retain copies; nor shall the witnesses’ 

counsel. 

5. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such 

information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set 

forth herein. 

6. For applications and motions to the Court on which a party submits Confidential 

Information, all documents and chamber copies containing Confidential Information which are 

submitted to the Court shall be filed with the Court in sealed envelopes or other appropriate 

sealed containers. On the outside of the envelopes, a copy of the first page of the document shall 

be attached. If Confidential Information is included in the first page attached to the outside of the 

envelopes, it may be deleted from the outside copy. The word “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be 

stamped on the envelope and a statement substantially in the following form shall also be printed 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 161 Filed 02/27/07 Page 3 of 8
Farella Braun & Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 954-4400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 4 - 21447\1157859.1

Stipulation And [Proposed] Confidentiality Order 

Court Case No. C 06-04435 CRB 

on the envelope: 

This envelope is sealed pursuant to order of the Court, contains 

Confidential Information and is not to be opened or the contents 

revealed, except by Order of the Court or agreement by the parties. 

In the event that the Clerk’s Office refuses to accept a document filed under seal, the 

filing party shall, not later than the next business day, file a notice indicating which documents 

the party attempted to file. The filing party shall also serve a copy of the rejected filing by 

overnight mail on Morrison & Foerster, PwC, and Brocade. If Morrison & Foerster, PwC, or 

Brocade want to contest the public filing of the document they must file a motion to that effect 

within five (5) business days of the initial filing date. If no motion is received, the filing party 

may file the document publicly within seven (7) business days of the initial filing. If a motion is 

filed to permit the filing to be made under seal, the filing party may not file the document with 

the confidential material included therein until the motion is resolved. This procedure shall not 

affect any Court order or other rule regarding the scheduling for future filings. 

7. If a party contends that any material is not entitled to confidential treatment, such 

party may at any time give written notice to Morrison & Foerster and PwC. Morrison & Foerster 

or PwC shall have twenty-five (25) days from the receipt of such written notice to apply to the 

Court for an order designating the material as confidential. 

8. Notwithstanding any challenge to the designation of material as Confidential 

Information, all documents designated as confidential shall be treated as such and shall be subject 

to the provisions hereof unless and until one of the following occurs: 

(a) Morrison & Foerster or PwC withdraws such designation in writing; or 

(b) Morrison & Foerster or PwC fails to apply to the Court for an order 

designating the material confidential within the time period specified 

above after receipt of a written challenge to such designation; or 

(c) the Court rules the material is not Confidential Information. 

9. All provisions of this Order restricting the communication or use of Confidential 

Information shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of this action and any related 

criminal or civil action, unless otherwise agreed or ordered. Upon conclusion of the litigation, a 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 161 Filed 02/27/07 Page 4 of 8
Farella Braun & Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 954-4400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 5 - 21447\1157859.1

Stipulation And [Proposed] Confidentiality Order 

Court Case No. C 06-04435 CRB 

party in the possession of Confidential Information, other than that which is contained in 

pleadings, correspondence and transcripts, shall either (a) return such documents to counsel for 

the party or non-party who provided such information no later than thirty (30) days after a request 

by such counsel, or (b) destroy such documents within ninety (90) days following the conclusion 

of this action and all appeals and certify in writing within thirty (30) days following destruction 

that the documents have been destroyed. 

10. If confidential information is inadvertently produced without marking it as such, it 

may be disclosed to others until the receiving party becomes aware of the error. As soon as the 

receiving party becomes aware of the inadvertent production, the information must be treated as 

though it had been timely designated under this Confidentiality Order, and the receiving party 

must endeavor in good faith to obtain all copies of the documents that it distributed or disclosed 

to persons not authorized by Paragraphs 4 herein, as well as any copies made by such persons. 

11. Nothing herein shall be deemed to waive any applicable privilege or work-product 

protection, or to affect the ability of a party to seek relief for an inadvertent disclosure of material 

protected by privilege or work-product protection. 

12. This Confidentiality Order shall not apply to or affect the use of information 

already in the possession of a party or obtained by a party outside the course of discovery in this 

litigation. 

 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 161 Filed 02/27/07 Page 5 of 8
Farella Braun & Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 954-4400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 6 - 21447\1157859.1

Stipulation And [Proposed] Confidentiality Order 

Court Case No. C 06-04435 CRB 

DATED: February 22, 2007 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 

By: /s/ 

Douglas R. Young 

Attorneys for Third-Party 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

DATED: February 22, 2007 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & 

FLOM LLP 

By: /s/ 

Jack DiCanio 

Attorneys for Defendant 

GREGORY L. REYES 

DATED: February 22, 2007 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

By: /s/ 

Norman J. Blears 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ANTONIO CANOVA 

DATED: February 22, 2007 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 

By: /s/ 

Jan Nielsen Little 

Attorneys for Defendant 

STEPHANIE JENSEN 

DATED: February 22, 2007 SECURITIES & EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

By: /s/ 

Susan Fleischmann 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 161 Filed 02/27/07 Page 6 of 8
Farella Braun & Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 954-4400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 7 - 21447\1157859.1

Stipulation And [Proposed] Confidentiality Order 

Court Case No. C 06-04435 CRB 

DATED: February 22, 2007 DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL 

By: /s/ 

Jared R. Winnick 

Attorneys for Third-Party 

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS 

DATED: February 22, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & 

ROSATI 

By: /s/ 

Caz Hashemi 

 Attorneys for Third-Party 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS, INC. 

I attest that concurrence in the filing of the above stipulation has been obtained from all 

counsel listed above. 

DATED: February 22, 2007 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 

By: /s/ 

Douglas R. Young 

Attorneys for Third-Party 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

Provided that all requests to file any material under seal comports with Local Rule 79-5, THE 

FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________, 2007 

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Judge 

February 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 161 Filed 02/27/07 Page 7 of 8
Farella Braun & Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 954-4400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 8 - 21447\1157859.1

Stipulation And [Proposed] Confidentiality Order 

Court Case No. C 06-04435 CRB 

APPENDIX A

CERTIFICATION

 I hereby certify my understanding that Confidential Information is being provided to me 

pursuant to the terms and restrictions of the Confidentiality Stipulation and Order dated 

_______________________ in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gregory L. Reyes, 

Stephanie Jensen and Antonio Canova, Case No. C 06-04435 CRB (N.D. Cal.). I have been 

given a copy of that Order and read it. I agree to be bound by the Order. I will not reveal the 

Confidential Information to anyone, except as allowed by the Order. I will maintain all such 

Confidential Information -- including copies, notes or other transcriptions made therefrom -- in a 

secure manner to prevent unauthorized access to it. No later than thirty (30) days after the 

conclusion of this action, I will return the Confidential Information -- including copies, notes or 

other transcriptions made therefrom -- to the counsel who provided me with the Confidential 

Information. I hereby consent to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the Confidentiality Order. 

SIGNATURE: 

DATED: 

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 161 Filed 02/27/07 Page 8 of 8