Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01068/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01068-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD LOUIS ARNOLD PHILLIPS,

Petitioner,

v.

DAVE DAVEY,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:14-cv-01068-LJO-SAB-HC

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

ON PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION

Petitioner is proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

1

 

On June 10, 2015, the undersigned issued a findings and recommendation for the petition and 

Petitioner’s motion to stay the state court proceedings. (ECF No. 39). Petitioner filed objections 

to the findings and recommendation and Respondent filed a reply to the objections. (ECF Nos. 

46, 47). On August 25, 2015, the Court adopted the findings and recommendation, denied the 

petition for writ of habeas corpus, dismissed without prejudice the claim about pro per privileges, 

denied Petitioner’s motions for a stay of the state court proceedings, and denied Petitioner’s 

request for a certificate of appealability. (ECF No. 48). On September 8, 2015, Petitioner filed a 

motion for reconsideration of the Court’s August 25, 2015 order pursuant to Rule 59(b) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and cited Harrison v. Gillespie, 640 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2011), 

 

1

Petitioner argues that this action is actually a pre-trial habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

Case 1:14-cv-01068-LJO-SAB Document 51 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

to support his argument. (ECF No. 50). Alternatively, Petitioner requests that the Court issue a 

certificate of appealability for his claims. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent shall file a response to 

Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s August 25, 2015 order, including whether 

Harrison v. Gillespie, 640 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2011), applies to this case, within thirty (30) days 

of the date of service of this order. Petitioner may file a reply to Respondent’s response within 

twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of Respondent’s response. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 10, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01068-LJO-SAB Document 51 Filed 09/11/15 Page 2 of 2