Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80088/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80088-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAOUL BENNETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

LEAD INFO STREAM INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-mc-80088-JSC 

ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 1

Presently before the Court is non-party Quinstreet Media, Inc.’s motion to quash a 

subpoena that Plaintiff Raoul Bennett issued in a civil action (the “Action”) now pending in the 

Southern District of California. (Dkt. No. 1.) The subpoena commands Quinstreet’s appearance 

at a deposition and requires Quinstreet to produce confidential documents relating to its business. 

(Id. at 2.) Quinstreet contends that the subpoena must be quashed because it seeks discovery of 

information unrelated to issues in the Action. (Id.) It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file 

by Tuesday, April 7, 2015, a response to the motion setting forth why the subpoena should not be 

quashed. Quinstreet may file a reply by Friday, April 10, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 2, 2015

________________________

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-mc-80088-JSC Document 6 Filed 04/02/15 Page 1 of 1