Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00009/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00009-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Bruce A. Neilson #096952

7108 N. Fresno St. #410

Fresno, California 93720

Telephone (559) 432-9831

Facsimile (559) 432-1837

Attorney for Defendants

Inderjit Singh and Tarsem Singh,

both individually and dba PB Liquor & 

Food

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

* * * * *

RONALD MOORE,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

INDERJIT SINGH, individually and dba PB

LIQUOR & FOOD; TARSEM SINGH,

individually and dba PB LIQUOR & FOOD;

 Defendants.

____________________________________

))))))

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-00009-AWI-SAB

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR INDERJIT 

SINGH, individually and dba PB LIQUOR 

& FOOD; and TARSEM SINGH,

individually and dba PB LIQUOR & 

FOOD TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

WHEREAS:

1. Plaintiff RONALD MOORE filed amended complaint in this action on January 5, 2015.

2. This is the second request for an extension of time for INDERJIT SINGH, individually and 

dba PB LIQUOR & FOOD; and TARSEM SINGH, individually and dba PB LIQUOR & FOOD 

(“Defendants”). A previous extension of time was granted by the plaintiff within the statutory 

allowance; thus, court approval is required for a further extension of time.

3. Plaintiff and Defendants are in settlement negotiations at this time.

4. Defendants have ordered a CASp inspection, and are waiting for the inspection, and for 

report to be written so that a proposed plan of remediation and settlement can be agreed upon. 

5. The parties agree that settlement of this case would save valuable court time and resources.

6. The parties have agreed to extend Defendant’s time to respond to the complaint until 

Case 1:15-cv-00009-AWI-SAB Document 11 Filed 03/05/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

March 30, 2015, subject to the court's approval, and believe that the case can be settled within that 

time.

7. This extension of time will not alter any date or event already set by Court order, including 

the mandatory scheduling conference.

NOW THEREFORE, Defendants through their attorneys, and Plaintiff Ronald Moore, 

through his attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendants INDERJIT SINGH, 

individually and dba PB LIQUOR & FOOD; and TARSEM SINGH, individually and dba PB 

LIQUOR & FOOD to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended up to and 

including March 30, 2015, pending court approval.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

MOORE LAW FIRM, PC

Dated: February 27, 2015 /s/Tanya Moore

 Tanya Moore, Attorney for Plaintiff Ronald Moore

Dated: February 27, 2015 /s/Bruce A. Neilson 

Bruce A. Neilson, Attorney for Defendants 

Inderjit Singh and Tarsem Singh, both individually 

and dba PB Liquor & Food

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 5, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00009-AWI-SAB Document 11 Filed 03/05/15 Page 2 of 2