Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00800/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00800-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VIRGIL E. HOLT,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. NICHOLAS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00800-AWI-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(DOC. 23)

Plaintiff Virgil E. Holt (“plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 23, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which

was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and

Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file a timely Objection to the

Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 23, 2010, is adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s claims in Counts 13 through 16 of Plaintiff’s second amended complaint

are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice;

1

Case 1:09-cv-00800-SAB Document 28 Filed 09/03/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. Defendants Crouch, Hopkins, Eubanks, Nipper, Stevenson, and Lundy are

DISMISSED from this action without prejudice; and

4. This action proceed on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed April 8, 2010

against (a) Defendants R. Nicholas, A. Holguin, J. Ortega, L. Machado, J. Juden, G.

Adame, F. Rivera, R. Valverde, D. Coontz, M. Bubbel, K. Prior, J. Tyree, Large,

Soto, Yubeta, Worrell, Vo, Knight, T. Crouch, Pinkerton, Valasco, and Does 1

through 5 and 7 through 10 for violation of the Eighth Amendment, (b) against

Defendant Holguin for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment, and (c)

Defendants Carrasco and D. Zanchi for supervisory liability.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 2, 2010 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2

Case 1:09-cv-00800-SAB Document 28 Filed 09/03/10 Page 2 of 2