Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00373/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00373-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT HOWE, an individual, CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00373-JST

Plaintiff(s), 

 

v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

SAP INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, SAP AMERICA, INC.,

a Delaware corporation, and DOES

1 through 100, inclusive,

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process:

☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

 other requested deadline: September 1, 2016

Dated: __May 2, 2016 ____/s/ Michael Dillingham__

Attorney for Plaintiff Robert Howe

Dated: __May 2, 2016 ____/s/ Brian L. Johnsrud____

Attorney for Defendants

SAP Industries, Inc. and SAP America, Inc.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case 3:16-cv-00373-JST Document 22 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 2
☐ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

☐ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: -XQH __________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

 

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

 

Rev. 12/11

 Page 2 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

X

Case 3:16-cv-00373-JST Document 22 Filed 06/29/16 Page 2 of 2