Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05125/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05125-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN R. MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

W. SHAW, et al.,

Defendants.

1:03-CV-5125 OWW SMS P

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REVIEW DOCUMENTS IN CAMERA

AND FILE THEM UNDER SEAL (Doc.

88) 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

DISPOSITIVE MOTION (Doc. 90)

Defendants Berkler, Cobbs, Lopez, Rodriguez, Shaw and Ybarra have moved for the Court

to review in camera, and file under seal, four documents from Martinez’s central file, referenced

as Exhibits B, C, D, and E in support of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Good cause

appearing, the motion is granted. The Clerk is directed to keep the four documents under seal

during the pendency of this litigation, and to return them to defense counsel at the conclusion of

this litigation. 

Defendants also moved for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion. Good cause

appearing, the Motion is GRANTED. 

The Court HEREBY ORDERS: 

1. The Motion to file documents under seal is GRANTED;

2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file the confidential documents under seal when

they are submitted by the Defendants. Defendants should designate the documents as

“CONFIDENTIAL” and attach a copy of this Order to them so as to notify the Clerk of

Court that they are to be filed under seal. 

Case 1:03-cv-05125-OWW -SMS Document 92 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. The Defendant’s Motion for an extension of time to file the Motion for Summary

Judgment is GRANTED; and 

4. The “CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS” and “MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT” are DUE within TEN (10) DAYS of the date of service of this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 22, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05125-OWW -SMS Document 92 Filed 02/22/07 Page 2 of 2