Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01787/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01787-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCSSV1:416972.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MODIFYING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE 

DEADLINES (C-04-1787) 

LYNNE C. HERMLE (STATE BAR NO. 99779) 

JOSEPH C. LIBURT (STATE BAR NO. 155507) 

JESSICA R. PERRY (STATE BAR NO. 209321) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: 650-614-7400 

Facsimile: 650-614-7401 

Attorneys for Defendants 

APPLE COMPUTER, INC. and 

DAVID BLACK 

WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY, ESQ. 

LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY 

703 Market Street, Suite 1407 

San Francisco, CA 94103 

Telephone: 415-675-7705 

Facsimile: 415-675-2530 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NANCY ZAYED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NANCY ZAYED, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

APPLE COMPUTERS, a corporation doing 

business in California; DAVID BLACK, an 

individual, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 

Defendants.

Case No. C-04-1787 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CHANGE TIME 

REGARDING EXPERT WITNESS 

DISCLOSURE DEADLINES 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:04-cv-01787-JW Document 21 Filed 07/22/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCSSV1:416972.1 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MODIFYING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE 

DEADLINES (C-04-1787) 

The parties hereto, and their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS the Court previously entered a Scheduling Order in this cause on 

February 1, 2005; 

WHEREAS the Scheduling Order sets forth dates related to the disclosure of 

expert witnesses pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(a); 

WHEREAS the expert disclosure deadline is August 1, 2005 (see Sched. Order ¶ 

4), the deadline to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses is August 15, 2005 (see Sched. Order ¶ 5), 

and the deadline to have heard any motion challenging the qualifications of or proposed 

testimony of designated expert witnesses is September 16, 2005 (see Sched. Order, ¶ 7); 

WHEREAS discovery closes on October 3, 2005; 

WHEREAS the Parties agree that although discovery in this case has proceeded, it 

has not been substantially completed, such that the expert witness reports required by Rule 

26(a)(2)(B) if prepared today would be substantially incomplete based on the discovery thus far; 

WHEREAS the Parties agree that the preparation of such incomplete reports 

would be premature and a waste of resources; 

WHEREAS Plaintiff has indicated her intention to move to file a Second 

Amended Complaint, which will require further discovery into the new allegations and claims; 

WHEREAS the Parties believe that extending the expert witness deadlines set out 

above until after the court rules on the parties’ dispositive motions will be conducive to the 

efficient and expedient conduct of this litigation and will serve the ends of justice and avoid 

unnecessary costs; and

WHEREAS the Parties have not previously requested any time modifications to 

the Scheduling Order deadlines set by the Court, 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The deadlines set forth in the Court’s February 1, 2005, Scheduling Order 

should be modified as follows: 

Case 5:04-cv-01787-JW Document 21 Filed 07/22/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCSSV1:416972.1 - 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

MODIFYING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE 

DEADLINES (C-04-1787) 

(a) the deadline to disclose expert witnesses pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(a) 

is January 6, 2006; 

(b) the deadline to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses is January 20, 

2006;

(c) the hearing deadline for motions objecting to the qualifications or 

proposed testimony of any expert is March 6, 2006. 

(d) The discovery deadline is extended to February 20, 2006, as to 

expert discovery only, and shall otherwise remain October 3, 2005, 

for all non-expert discovery. 

2. This Stipulation shall be made an Order of the Court. 

Dated: July 20, 2005 LYNNE C. HERMLE 

JOSEPH C. LIBURT 

JESSICA R. PERRY 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

 /s/

Jessica R. Perry 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Apple Computer, Inc. and David Black 

Dated: July 20, 2005 WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY, ESQ. 

LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY 

/s/

Rachael Orejana 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Nancy Zayed 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________, 2005 

Hon. James Ware 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

/s/ James Ware

July 22

Case 5:04-cv-01787-JW Document 21 Filed 07/22/05 Page 3 of 3