Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01560/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01560-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RENEE V. COCLETZI,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1560 MCE EFB P

vs.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY JAIL,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42

U.S.C. § 1983. On August 1, 2007, plaintiff submitted an application for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis without a certified copy of his trust account statement for the six months

immediately preceding the filing of the action, or the institutional equivalent. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(a)(2). On September 28, 2007, the court gave plaintiff 30 days to submit a certified copy

of his trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the

complaint and warned him that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed. 

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not submitted a copy of his trust account

statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or 

otherwise responded to that order.

Case 2:07-cv-01560-MCE -EFB Document 5 Filed 11/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

It therefore is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: November 27, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-01560-MCE -EFB Document 5 Filed 11/27/07 Page 2 of 2