Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-05197/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-05197-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action

---

ORDER; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION – No. 19-cv-05197-LB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

San Francisco Division

:MANSA- EL: BEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

NANCY E. O'MALLEY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-05197-LB

ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE TO A 

DISTRICT JUDGE; REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS 

COMPLAINT

Re: ECF No. 1

The undersigned granted pro se plaintiff :Mansa-El: Bey’s1application to proceed in forma

pauperis.2 The undersigned issued an order screening Mr. Bey’s complaint for minimum legal

viability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and dismissing it without prejudice for failure to 

state a claim.3 The undersigned extended Mr. Bey until September 12, 2019, to file an amended 

 

1 Mr. Bey uses this punctuation. See Compl. – ECF No. 1 at 1. Citations refer to material in the 

Electronic Case File (“ECF”); pinpoint citations are to the ECF-generated page numbers at the top of 

documents.

2 Order – ECF No. 3.

3 Order – ECF No. 9.

Case 3:19-cv-05197-EMC Document 10 Filed 09/18/19 Page 1 of 2
ORDER; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION – No. 19-cv-05197-LB 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

complaint.4 The September 12 deadline has passed, and Mr. Bey has not filed an amended 

complaint.5

Mr. Bey has declined magistrate-judge jurisdiction,6and thus this case will be reassigned to a 

district judge for all further proceedings. For the reasons stated in the undersigned’s prior order 

(attached), the undersigned recommends that Mr. Bey’s complaint be dismissed for failure to state 

a claim and the case be closed. Any party may serve and file specific written objections to this 

recommendation within 14 days after being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 72-3. Failure to file written objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to review of the issue in the district court.

Because this case is being reassigned, the undersigned’s partial grant of permission to Mr. Bey 

for electronic case filing no longer applies.7If Mr. Bey wishes to continue electronic case filing, 

he must seek permission again before the district judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND RECOMMENDED.

Dated: September 18, 2019

______________________________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge

 

4

Id. at 4–5.

5

See Docket.

6 Bey Declination – ECF No. 6.

7 Order – ECF No. 8.

Case 3:19-cv-05197-EMC Document 10 Filed 09/18/19 Page 2 of 2