Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00717/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00717-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SMITH, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

K. MENDOZA-POWERS, WARDEN,

Defendant. 

 /

1:06-cv-00717-OWW-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 11)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER/

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Doc. 10)

Plaintiff, Michael Smith (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On December 29, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days from the date of service of that order. On January 29,

2007, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time. On March 1, 2007,

the court granted plaintiff an additional thirty (30) days within

Case 1:06-cv-00717-OWW -DLB Document 17 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

which to respond. On April 18, 2007, plaintiff filed objections

to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 29,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order/

preliminary injunctive relief, filed December 26, 2006, is

DENIED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00717-OWW -DLB Document 17 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 2