Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03072/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03072-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION REGARDING 

RESPONSIVE DECLARATION 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053)

redwards@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

BRIAN C. ANDERSON (S.B. #126539) 

banderson@omm.com 

SCOTT M. HAMMACK (pro hac vice) 

shammack@omm.com 

DAVID R. DOREY (S.B. #286843) 

ddorey@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

1625 Eye Street, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20006-4001 

Tеlephone: (202) 383-5300 

Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER 

LITIGATION 

Case No. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING FURTHER MODIFICATION 

TO DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE 

DECLARATION REGARDING MOTION 

TO SEAL CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEF 

[N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-11] 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 209 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 5
- 1 - STIPULATION REGARDING 

RESPONSIVE DECLARATION 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their fifty page motion for class certification and 

memorandum of law in support thereof on Thursday, January 28, 2016; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs cited numerous documents in their class certification papers that 

have been designated by Ford as Protected Documents pursuant to the protective order entered in 

this case (ECF No. 96), and made numerous assertions that are derived from such Protective 

Documents; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Protective Order and Local Rule 79-5, Plaintiffs filed their 

papers as partially redacted so as not to disclose the contents of the Protected Documents, and 

filed a motion to seal the redacted information; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation entered by this Court, Ford is required to file a 

responsive declaration supporting the sealing of the Protected Documents or information derived 

therefrom in Plaintiffs’ papers by February 5, 2016 (see ECF No. 207); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs had not yet filed their class certification papers at the time the prior 

stipulation was filed; 

WHEREAS, Ford has been diligently working on drafting its responsive declaration, but 

the breadth of the Protected Documents Plaintiffs cited in their papers has proven to make it 

impractical to finish the declaration by February 5, despite best efforts; 

WHEREAS, Ford requires an extension of two business days in order to complete its 

responsive declaration; 

WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-11 permits a party to seek miscellaneous administrative relief 

pursuant to a stipulation by the parties; 

WHEREAS, the deadline extension stipulated to by Ford and Plaintiffs will require no 

change to the dates set for trial of the matter; 

WHEREAS, execution of this Stipulation is not a waiver of any claims or defenses 

Plaintiffs or Ford otherwise may have; 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Ford, through their 

counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows: 

1. The deadline for Ford to file a responsive declaration to establish that certain 

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 209 Filed 02/08/16 Page 2 of 5
- 2 - STIPULATION REGARDING 

RESPONSIVE DECLARATION 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

material in Plaintiffs’ class certification papers is sealable is further extended to 

February 9, 2016. 

Dated: February 4, 2016 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Randall W. Edwards 

 Randall W. Edwards 

Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company 

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 209 Filed 02/08/16 Page 3 of 5
- 3 - STIPULATION REGARDING 

RESPONSIVE DECLARATION 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: February 4, 2016 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO 

LLP 

By: /s/ Craig Spiegel 

 Craig Spiegel 

Steve W. Berman 

Craig Spiegel 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

1918 8th Avenue, Suite 3300 

Seattle, Washington 98101 

Tel: (206) 623-7292 

Fax: (206) 623-0594 

steve@hbsslaw.com 

Adam J. Levitt 

GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 

30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1200 

Chicago, Illinois 60602 

Tel: (312) 214-0000 

Fax: (312) 214-0001 

alevitt@gelaw.com 

Roland Tellis (186269) 

Mark Pifko (228412) 

BARON & BUDD, P.C. 

15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1600 

Encino, California 91436 

Tel: (818) 839-2320 

Fax: (818) 986-9698 

rtellis@baronbudd.com 

mpifko@baronbudd.com 

Joseph G. Sauder (pro hac vice) 

Matthew D. Schelkopf (pro hac vice) 

CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP 

One Haverford Centre 

361 West Lancaster Avenue 

Haverford, Pennsylvania 19041 

Tel: (610) 642-8500 

Fax: (610) 649-3633 

JGS@chimicles.com 

MDS@chimicles.com 

Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 209 Filed 02/08/16 Page 4 of 5
- 4 - STIPULATION REGARDING 

RESPONSIVE DECLARATION 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FILER’S ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose 

behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. 

Dated: February 4, 2016 Randall W. Edwards 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Randall W. Edwards 

 Randall W. Edwards 

Attorney for Defendant Ford Motor Company 

O R D E R 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February , 2016 

The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

 United States District Judge 

8

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 209 Filed 02/08/16 Page 5 of 5