Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-00826/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-00826-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TYRONE ADAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-11-826 GEB CKD PS

vs.

CHARLES EASLEY, et al., ORDER

Defendants.

 /

 On December 30, 2011, plaintiff filed four motions: a motion to stay, a motion

for leave to file an amended complaint, a motion for evidentiary hearing, and a motion for

reconsideration. As with most of plaintiff’s filings in this action, the motions are duplicative, do

not cite relevant law, and make no attempt to make reasoned argument in support of the

requested relief. The motions will therefore be denied.

Plaintiff has filed numerous pleadings since commencement of this action. Many

of the pleadings are not pertinent to issues before the court, are duplicative, are not properly

noticed for hearing, and do not advance meaningful argument. The multiplicity of plaintiff’s

filings are a burden on both the court and defendants and impede the proper prosecution and

////

Case 2:11-cv-00826-GEB-CKD Document 87 Filed 01/04/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

defense of this action. Plaintiff’s future filings shall therefore be limited. 

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motions filed December 30, 2011 (dkt. nos. 78, 79, 80, 81) are denied.

2. Plaintiff’s future filings are hereafter limited. Plaintiff may only file the

following documents:

a. One opposition to any motion filed by defendants (and clearly titled as

such);

b. Only one motion pending at any time. Such motion must be properly

noticed for hearing. Plaintiff is limited to one memorandum of points and authorities in support

of the motion and one reply to any opposition; and 

c. One set of objections to any findings and recommendations.

Failure to comply with this order shall result in improperly filed documents being

stricken from the record and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

Dated: January 4, 2012

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4

adams.lim

 Calendared for hearing on January 25, 2012 are defendants’ motions for sanctions and 1

to dismiss. Plaintiff has filed opposition to these motions. No further opposition may be filed.

2

Case 2:11-cv-00826-GEB-CKD Document 87 Filed 01/04/12 Page 2 of 2