Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03972/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03972-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ann Gramlich, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

J C Penney Corporation, Inc.,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 05-3972-PHX-DKD

ORDER

Upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand, the Response and Reply,

Defendant's Supplement which included Plaintiffs' First Supplemental Disclosure Statement

setting forth "A Computation of the Measure of Damages Alleged" listing medical expenses of

$80,005.58, and oral argument, the Court finds that Defendant has demonstrated by a

preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Cohn v.

Petsmart, Inc., 281 F.3d 837, 840 (9th Cir, 2002) (court may consider materials supplemental

to removal petition). Upon this finding that the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional

minimum, 

IT IS ORDERED DENYING Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand (Doc. # 12).

DATED this 1st day of March, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03972-DKD Document 22 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 1