Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-05385/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-05385-33/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:183 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

*E-FILED 8/20/07*

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP PTE

LTD. and AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES ECBU IP

LTD.

Plaintiffs,

v.

ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORP. and

ELAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

GROUP,

Defendants. 

Case No. C04-05385 JW (HRL)

ORDER (1) MAKING EXHIBITS PART

OF THE PUBLIC RECORD AND (2)

REQUIRING RESUBMISSION OF

EXHIBITS

Docket Nos. 289, 308 

Exhibit 12 to the Declaration of Jonathan P. Steinsapir in support of Avago's Motion to

Strike Portions of the Expert Report of Professor Berthold K.P. Horn [Docket No. 288] was

initially submitted under seal pursuant to the Protective Order issued by this court because

Defendants had designated it as "Outside Counsel's Eyes Only." However, Defendants now

advise that they do not oppose filing this exhibit in the public record. Therefore, the court

ORDERS Exhibit 12 to be filed in the public record. 

The court further ORDERS Plaintiffs to resubmit this exhibit for filing in electronic

form no later than August 27, 2007. 

//

//

Case 5:04-cv-05385-JW Document 370 Filed 08/20/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Exhibits B and D to the Declaration of S.H. Michael Kim in Support of [Elan's]

Opposition to Avago's Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Report of Professor Berthold

K.P. Horn [Docket No. 307] were initially submitted under seal pursuant to the Protective Order

issued by this court because Plaintiffs had designated them as "Confidential." However,

Plaintiffs now advise that they do not oppose filing these exhibits in the public record. 

Therefore, the court ORDERS Exhibits B and D to be filed in the public record. 

The court further ORDERS Defendants to resubmit these exhibits for filing in electronic

form no later than August 27, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 8/20/07 ____________________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:04-cv-05385-JW Document 370 Filed 08/20/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

THIS SHALL CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS ORDER WILL BE SENT TO:

Morgan Chu mchu@irell.com 

Hsin-Yi Cindy Feng cfeng@akingump.com 

Alan J. Heinrich aheinrich@irell.com 

Yitai Hu yhu@akingump.com 

Sang Hui Michael Kim mkim@akingump.com, btseng@akingump.com,

nthreadgill@akingump.com, skapralov@akingump.com 

Samuel Kai Lu slu@irell.com 

Richard Elgar Lyon , III rlyon@irell.com, CMcEntee@irell.com, jgordon@irell.com,

mwilliams@irell.com, rick.lyon@gmail.com 

Gary C. Ma gma@akingump.com 

David Craig McPhie dmcphie@irell.com, jrichter@irell.com 

Elizabeth Hannah Rader erader@akingump.com, btseng@akingump.com,

nmarie@akingump.com, skapralov@akingump.com 

Jonathan Philip Steinsapir jsteinsapir@irell.com 

* Counsel are responsible for providing copies of this order to co-counsel.

Dated: 8/20/07

 /s/ KRO 

 Chambers of Magistrate Judge Lloyd

Case 5:04-cv-05385-JW Document 370 Filed 08/20/07 Page 3 of 3