Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05659/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05659-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

RPR-16-2087 16:43 THE CHUGH FIRM 

WILLIAM J. FRXMEL (Bar No. 160287) 

bil1,frirnel@dlapiper.com 

JEROLD L. HERSH (Bar No. 22565 1) 

jeny.hersh@dIapiper.com 

DLA PIPER US LLP 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2248 

Tel: 650-833-2000 

Fax: 650-833-2001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff CAE ONLINE, LLC 

ANTOINETTE MCGlLL (Bar No. 14852 1) 

mtoinette,mcgill@chugh.com 

THE CHUGH FIRM, APC 

4800 Great America Parkway, Suite 3 10 

Santa Clara, California 95054 

Telephone: (408) 970-0 100 

Facsimile: (408) 970-0200 

Attorneys for Defendant CONTROLLED 

SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

l4 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

15 11 SAN JOSE DIVISlON I 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR DISMXSSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION 

PURSUANT TO FED. R CIV. P. 41(a)(l) 

CAE ONLINE, LLC, a California limited 1 

liability company, CASE NO. C06-05659 HRL (RS) 

I I TECH LASER SYSTEMS, INC,, a Delaware 

corporation, and 

~CN'fXOL.LED SEMICONDUCTOR, INC-9 a 

Florida corporation, 

CONTROLLED MARKING SYSTEMS, INC,, 

a Florida corporation, 

25 I1 JON WILLIAM HEYL, an individual, I 

Honorable Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd 

Complaint filed: September 15, 2006 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PEJUDICE OF 

ENTlRE ACTION, CASE NO. C06-05659 HRL (RS) i 

26 

27 

2 8 

Defendants. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

*E-FILED 4/18/07*

Case 5:06-cv-05659-HRL Document 26 Filed 04/18/07 Page 1 of 3
THE CHUGH FIRM 

1 

2 

5 Marking Systems, Inc., Defendant Tech Laser Systems, Inc., and Defendant Jon William Heyl, on I I 

The undersigned parties, through their respective counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE 

as follows: 

3 

4 

6 11 the other hand (collectively, the "Parties") entmd into a written Settlement Agreement and Mutual I 

WHEREAS Plaintiff/Counterdefendant CAE Online, LLC ("CAE"), on the one hand, and 

Defendant/Counterclaimant Controlled Semiconductor, Inc. (b'ConSemi"), Defendant Controlled 

7 

X 

9 

I2 II THEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the Parties hereby I 

Release ("Settlement Agreement") with respect to this action; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, CAE and Consemi agreed 

to dismiss their operative complaint and counterclaims, respectively, in this action; and 

10 

1 1 

13 stipulate, by and through counsel, to the dismissal with prejudice of the entirety ofthis action. Each I I I 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Parties have agreed to 

bear their own attorneys' fees and costs in this action; 

14 I] party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 

lb I/ IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

17 

18 

April & 2007 

Dated: April, 17 2007 

I 0 

20 

2 1 

22 

23 

2 4 

2 5 

2 6 

27 

DLA PIPER US LLP 

Dated: 

By: Jerold b) Hersh 

~ttornws for Plaintiff 

CAE ONLINE, LLC 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CONTROLLED SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. 

28 

EM\7217285,1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DLSMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 0 

ENTKE ACTION, CASE NO. C06-05659 HIU, 

363339-1 

Case 5:06-cv-05659-HRL Document 26 Filed 04/18/07 Page 2 of 3
THE CHUGH FIRM 

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing therefor, 

- ORDER 

IT IS I-IEREBY ORDERED THAT this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its 

entirety. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms 

of the settlement pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, including but not limited to jurisdiction ove 

disputes arising out of the Settlement Agreement. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Parties shall bear their own respective attorneys' 

fees and costs in this action. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, 

DATED: April, 2007 

THE HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD 

United States Magistrate Judge 

STTPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 0 

ENTIRE ACTION, CASE NO. CO6-05659 HRL 

18

Case 5:06-cv-05659-HRL Document 26 Filed 04/18/07 Page 3 of 3