Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00249/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00249-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Fuyin Yin Deng, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Katrina S. Kane, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-11-249-PHX-ROS (MHB)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 12). For

the reasons below, the R&R will be adopted.

BACKGROUND

On February 7, 2011, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus (“Petition”).

Petitioner alleged immigration officials were holding him in detention pending his removal

to China. On June 6, 2011, Respondent filed a response. On October 21, 2011, the Court

issued an order to show cause (“OSC”) why this case should not be dismissed as moot

because Petitioner was no longer in detention. The copy of the OSC mailed to Petitioner was

returned as undeliverable because Petitioner was not in custody. On October 31, 2011, the

R&R recommended the case should be dismissed without prejudice because it is moot.

Petitioner did not file any objections to the R&R. On November 23, 2011, Respondent filed

a notice suggesting the case was moot because Petitioner was removed from the United

States on or about June 9, 2011.

Case 2:11-cv-00249-ROS Document 15 Filed 12/02/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

ANALYSIS

A district court “must make a de novo determination of those portions of the report

. . . to which objection is made,” and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the

findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). A court

need review only those portions objected to by a party, meaning a court can adopt without

further review all unobjected to portions. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

The R&R recommends the case be dismissed as moot. The Court will adopt the R&R

in full.

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) is ADOPTED IN

FULL. The Petition (Doc. 1) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot.

IT IS ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal is denied because failure to file timely objections to any factual

determinations of the Magistrate Judge is considered a waiver of a party’s right to appellate

review of those findings of fact. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.

DATED this 1st day of December, 2011.

Case 2:11-cv-00249-ROS Document 15 Filed 12/02/11 Page 2 of 2