Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00488/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00488-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cibney R. Bello, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Washington Mutual Bank, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-0488-PHX-FJM

ORDER

The court has before it defendants Long Beach Securities Corporation, Long Beach

Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-6, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, WaMu Capital

Corporation, and California Reconveyance Company (the “Long Beach Defendants”) motion

to dismiss (doc. 8). Plaintiff did not respond to the motion. The Long Beach Defendants

then filed a motion for summary ruling (doc. 19). Again, plaintiff did not respond. 

Under LRCiv 7.2(i), if a party “does not serve and file the required answering

memoranda . . . such non-compliance may be deemed a consent to the denial or granting of

the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily.” We also construe

plaintiffs’ failure to respond to the motions as a failure to prosecute this action under Rule

41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 

Therefore, pursuant to Rule 41(b) and LRCiv 7.2(i), IT IS ORDERED GRANTING

defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 8), GRANTING defendants’ motion for summary ruling

Case 2:09-cv-00488-FJM Document 21 Filed 06/10/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

(doc. 19), and DENYING defendants’ motion for extension of time to file an answer as moot

(doc. 7). Although four defendants, Pacific Gold Mortgage Group, LLC, Credit Suisse

International, Washington Mutual Bank, and Long Beach Mortgage Company do not

expressly join the motion to dismiss, we dismiss the complaint against these defendants as

well, based on plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The clerk

shall enter final judgment in favor of all defendants. 

DATED this 10th day of June, 2009.

Case 2:09-cv-00488-FJM Document 21 Filed 06/10/09 Page 2 of 2