Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03778/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03778-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance

---

Case No. C 06-3778 JW RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND 

ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SONNENSCHEIN 

NATH 

&

ROSENTHAL LLP 

525

MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708 

(415) 882-5000 

GAYLE M. ATHANACIO (State Bar No. 130068) 

gathanacio@sonnenschein.com 

SANFORD KINGSLEY (State Bar No. 99849) 

skingsley@sonnenschein.com 

SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP 

525 Market Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2708 

Telephone: (415) 882-5000 

Facsimile: (415) 882-0300 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY 

SAMUEL KORNHAUSER, Esq. (State Bar No. 083528) 

LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL KORNHAUSER 

155 Jackson Street, Suite 1807 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 981-6281 

Facsimile: (415) 981-7616 

Mark P. Millen, Esq. (State Bar No. 196718) 

MARK P. MILLEN, ATTORNEY AT LAW 

2 North Santa Cruz Avenue, Suite 205 

Los Gatos, California 95080 

Telephone: (408) 399-9707 

Facsimile: (408) 399-9757 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

VLAHO MILETAK, an individual on his 

own behalf and on behalf of all other 

automobile insureds of Allstate Insurance 

Company, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, an 

Illinois corporation, 

 Defendant. 

No. C 06-3778 JW RS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO AMEND ORDER FOLLOWING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

TRIAL DATE: NONE SET 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:06-cv-03778-JW Document 69 Filed 02/29/08 Page 1 of 4
-1-

Case No. C 06-3778 JW RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND 

ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SONNENSCHEIN 

NATH 

&

ROSENTHAL LLP 

525

MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708 

(415) 882-5000 

 The undersigned counsel for both parties stipulate to this request to the Court to revise the 

current case management conference order which sets forth a schedule in connection with 

Plaintiff’s anticipated motion for class certification. The parties make this request to allow them 

sufficient time to conduct discovery, resolve discovery disputes (if any), and fully present to the 

Court their respective positions on class certification. Other than the discovery cut-off, which 

was previously stipulated to by the parties, and briefing and hearing schedule for a class 

certification motion, there are no other dates that have been set by the Court. In particular, there 

is no trial date currently set. 

 Therefore, counsel for both parties have agreed and stipulated to and hereby request that 

the Court amend its October 2, 2007 Order Following Case Management Conference as follows: 

 Discovery cut-off: June 15, 2008 

 Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification: September 8, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. 

 Plaintiff shall file and serve his motion for Class Certification on or before July 7, 2008. 

 Defendant shall file and serve it Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion on or before August 11, 

 2008. 

 Plaintiff shall file and serve its reply, if any, no later than August 25, 2008. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Date: February 21, 2008 SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP 

 By /S/ 

 GAYLE M. ATHANACIO 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY 

Case 5:06-cv-03778-JW Document 69 Filed 02/29/08 Page 2 of 4
-2-

Case No. C 06-3778 JW RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND 

ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SONNENSCHEIN 

NATH 

&

ROSENTHAL LLP 

525

MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708 

(415) 882-5000 

Date: February 21, 2008 LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL KORNHAUSER 

 By /S/ 

 SAMUEL KORNHAUSER 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

 I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from its signatories. 

 By /S/ 

 GAYLE M. ATHANACIO 

Case 5:06-cv-03778-JW Document 69 Filed 02/29/08 Page 3 of 4
-3-

Case No. C 06-3778 JW RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND 

ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SONNENSCHEIN 

NATH 

&

ROSENTHAL LLP 

525

MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708 

(415) 882-5000 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Having considered the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, the Case Management 

Order in this action is hereby modified as follows: 

 1. Discovery shall close June 15, 2008. 

 2. The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification is set for September 8, 

2008, at 9:00 a.m. The parties shall adhere to the following briefing schedule: 

(a) Plaintiff shall file and serve his motion for Class Certification on or before July 7, 2008. 

(b) Defendant shall file and serve it Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion on or before 

August 11, 2008. 

(c) Plaintiff shall file and serve his reply, if any, no later than August 25, 2008. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED:_________________ ______________________________________ 

 Judge, United States District Court 

May 16, 2008.

July 7, 2008 at 9 A.M. The parties shall adhere to the following briefing schedule: 

(1) Plaintiff shall file and serve its Motion on or before June 2, 2008.

(2) Defendant shall file and serve its Opposition on or before June 16, 2008.

(2) Plaintiff's Reply, if any, shall be filed on or before June 23, 2008.

The Court has extended the discovery cut-off deadline for an additional two and a half months. 

This should provide the parties with sufficient time to complete class discovery. This is a 2006 

case; the Court has a strong desire to move the case forward. Accordingly, the parties may not 

stipulate to a different briefing schedule. 

February 27, 2008

JAMES WARE 

United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-03778-JW Document 69 Filed 02/29/08 Page 4 of 4