Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03988/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03988-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVANSTON INSURANCE CO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC,

Defendant. /

No. C 15-03988 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC

VICE APPLICATIONS OF

ATTORNEYS SARAH

BALTZELL AND STAN SEXTON

The pro hac vice applications of Attorneys Sarah Baltzell and Stan Sexton (Dkt. Nos.

54–55) are DENIED for failing to comply with Civil Local Rule 11–3. The local rule requires

that an applicant certify that “he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a

United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, 

specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court

website such that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Texas” —

is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court (such as the

Supreme Court of Texas). While the application fees do not need to be paid again, the

applications cannot be processed until corrected forms are submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 5, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-03988-WHA Document 56 Filed 05/05/16 Page 1 of 1