Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01428/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01428-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

JOSHUA DEROCHE, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

LINDY FUNKHOUSE, M. BARGAN,

PAMELA BARR, JILL KENNEDY,

JASON LANE,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-1428-PHX-MHM (MEA)

ORDER

Currently before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey’s Report and

Recommendation addressing Plaintiff Joshua DeRoche’s (“Plaintiff’) April 27, 2007

motion to amend his complaint. (Dkt. #56). On September 19, 2007, Magistrate Judge

Aspey issued a Report and Recommendation that recommends that the Court (1) grant

Plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint to add “FNU” Espirito and “FNU” Wandry as

Defendants in this action; (2) order Plaintiff to return service packets to the Court for

Defendants Espirito and Wandry; and (3) order these Defendants to answer Plaintiff’s

allegation that they were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. 

Despite leave to do so as expressly stated in the Report and Recommendation, the

parties did not file objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. #56, p.6); see also

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). As no party objects to Magistrate Judge Aspey’s Report and

Recommendation and good cause appearing, the Court will adopt the Report and

Case 2:06-cv-01428-MHM Document 68 Filed 02/19/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Recommendation as the order of the Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (the district

court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified

proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”). 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED adopting in full the Report and Recommendation

(Dkt. #56) granting Plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint (Dkt. #29) as the order of

the Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to file Plaintiff’s

lodged second amended complaint (Dkt. #30). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing Plaintiff to return service packets to the

Court for Defendants Espirito and Wandry.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing Defendants Espirito and Wandry to

answer Plaintiff’s second amended complaint.

DATED this 14th day of February, 2008.

Case 2:06-cv-01428-MHM Document 68 Filed 02/19/08 Page 2 of 2