Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00722/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00722-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOHN D. COOK, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-0722 AC P 

ORDER and 

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 

 A recent court order was twice served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the 

postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which 

requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More 

than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and 

plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of a current address, thus authorizing dismissal of this 

action without prejudice. See Local Rule 183(b).1

 

1

 Local Rule 183(b) provides: 

A party appearing in propria persona shall keep the Court and 

opposing parties advised as to his or her current address. If mail 

directed to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk is returned by 

the U.S. Postal Service, and if such plaintiff fails to notify the Court 

and opposing parties within sixty-three (63) days thereafter of a 

current address, the Court may dismiss the action without prejudice 

for failure to prosecute. 

Case 2:14-cv-00722-KJM-AC Document 8 Filed 01/15/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a 

district judge to this case. 

 Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file and serve written 

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 

fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: January 14, 2015 

Case 2:14-cv-00722-KJM-AC Document 8 Filed 01/15/15 Page 2 of 2