Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-01561/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-01561-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

20137080.3 1 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL

CASE NO. C03-1561 MMC (EDL) 

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

RONALD S. KATZ (California Bar No. 085713) 

CHRISTOPHER L. WANGER (California Bar No. 164751) 

EUGENE L. HAHM (California Bar No. 167596) 

JEFFREY J. LOKEY (California Bar No. 200825) 

1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 

Telephone: (650) 812-1300 

Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON MANAGEMENT COMPANY V, 

LLC, DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON MANAGEMENT CO. VI, 

LLC, TIMOTHY C. DRAPER, JOHN H. N. FISHER and STEPHEN 

T. JURVETSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

I-ENTERPRISE COMPANY LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON 

MANAGEMENT COMPANY V, LLC, 

DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON 

MANAGEMENT CO. VI, LLC, TIMOTHY 

C. DRAPER, JOHN H. N. FISHER and 

STEPHEN T. JURVETSON, 

Defendants.

Case No. C03-1561 MMC (EDL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

ON MOTION TO (1) COMPEL PRODUCTION 

OF DOCUMENTS OF PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT 

WITNESS MARCIA KRAMER MAYER, Ph.D 

WITHHELD FROM PRODUCTION BY 

ATTORNEYS FOR I-ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY LLC; (2) COMPEL FURTHER 

DEPOSITION TESTIMONY FROM MARCIA 

KRAMER MAYER, Ph.D. CONCERNING 

THE CONTENT OF THE WITHHELD 

DOCUMENTS & DISCUSSIONS WITH IEC’S 

COUNSEL; AND (3) COMPEL FURTHER 

DEPOSITION TESTIMONY FROM 

PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT WITNESS PAUL L. 

ROSENBAUM CONCERNING TOPICS 

RAISED BY IEC’S ATTORNEYS ON 

CROSS-EXAMINATION 

DATE: July 12, 2005 

TIME: 9:00 a.m. 

PLACE: Courtroom E, 15th Floor 

JUDGE: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

Case 3:03-cv-01561-MMC Document 367 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 4
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

20137080.3 2 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL

CASE NO. C03-1561 MMC (EDL) 

WHEREAS, on June 7, 2005, Defendants, DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON 

MANAGEMENT COMPANY V, LLC, DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON MANAGEMENT 

CO. VI, LLC, TIMOTHY C. DRAPER, JOHN H. N. FISHER and STEPHEN T. JURVETSON 

(collectively, the “Defendants”) filed a Notice of Motion and Motion To: (1) Compel Production 

Of Documents Of Plaintiff’s Expert Witness Marcia Kramer Mayer, Ph.D. Withheld From 

Production By Attorneys For I-Enterprise Company LLC (“IEC”); (2) Compel Further Deposition 

Testimony From Marcia Kramer Mayer, Ph.D. Concerning The Content Of The Withheld 

Documents & Discussions With IEC’s Counsel; and (3) Compel Further Deposition Testimony 

From Plaintiff’s Expert Witness Paul L. Rosenbaum Concerning Topics Raised By IEC’s 

Attorneys On Cross-Examination; 

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2005, Plaintiff, IEC, submitted a Statement Of Non-Opposition 

to Defendants’ motion to compel and a [Proposed] Order; and 

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have further met and conferred concerning the 

discrepancies between the relief sought in Defendants’ motion and Plaintiff’s Statement of NonOpposition and [Proposed] Order and have reached a mutually agreeable accommodation 

regarding same. 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between 

the undersigned attorneys for the parties as follows: 

(1) IEC’s counsel shall produce without any redactions all of the notes of Dr. Marcia 

Kramer Mayer previously produced with redactions to Defendants’ counsel by July 15, 2005; 

(2) Defendants may, by the September 23, 2005 expert discovery cut-off, reopen Dr. 

Mayer’s deposition for up to an additional 30 minutes for questioning relating to the contents of 

the previously redacted portions of her notes to be produced hereunder; and 

(3) Defendants may, by the September 23, 2005 expert discovery cut-off, reopen Paul 

Rosenbaum’s deposition for up to an additional 20 minutes to question him regarding the 

obligations of a limited partner or potential limited partner to check up on the fund by doing 

additional due diligence, if any, beyond what is represented in the fund offering memorandum. 

Case 3:03-cv-01561-MMC Document 367 Filed 06/30/05 Page 2 of 4
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

20137080.3 3 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL

CASE NO. C03-1561 MMC (EDL) 

Dated: June 28, 2005 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

 By: /s/Jeffrey J. Lokey 

Jeffrey J. Lokey 

Attorneys for Defendants,

DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON 

MANAGEMENT COMPANY V, LLC, 

DRAPER FISHER JURVETSON 

MANAGEMENT CO. VI, LLC, TIMOTHY 

C. DRAPER, JOHN H. N. FISHER and 

STEPHEN T. JURVETSON 

Dated: June 28, 2005 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

 By: /s/Ashok Ramani 

Ashok Ramani 

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

I-ENTERPRISE COMPANY LLC 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General 

Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding 

signatures, Jeffrey J. Lokey hereby attests 

that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained. 

Case 3:03-cv-01561-MMC Document 367 Filed 06/30/05 Page 3 of 4
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

20137080.3 4 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL

CASE NO. C03-1561 MMC (EDL) 

ORDER

Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to compel certain redacted notes and 

additional testimony from IEC expert witness Dr. Marcia Kramer Mayer, and additional 

testimony from IEC expert witness Paul L. Rosenbaum. Having considered Defendants’ moving 

papers, Plaintiff’s non-opposition papers, the parties’ stipulation, and the case record, the Court 

finds that the parties are in substantial agreement, and to avoid further disputes, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

(1) IEC’s counsel shall produce without any redactions all of the notes of Dr. Marcia 

Kramer Mayer previously produced with redactions to Defendants’ counsel by July 15, 2005; 

(2) Defendants may, by the September 23, 2005 expert discovery cut-off, reopen Dr. 

Mayer’s deposition for up to an additional 30 minutes for questioning relating to the contents of 

the previously redacted portions of her notes to be produced hereunder; and 

(3) Defendants may, by the September 23, 2005 expert discovery cut-off, reopen Paul 

Rosenbaum’s deposition for up to an additional 20 minutes to question him regarding the 

obligations of a limited partner or potential limited partner to check up on the fund by doing 

additional due diligence, if any, beyond what is represented in the fund offering memorandum. 

DATED: June __, 2005 

THE HON. ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

30

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:03-cv-01561-MMC Document 367 Filed 06/30/05 Page 4 of 4