Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03418/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03418-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

---

1283724.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

MARCUS A. ROBERTS, KENNETH A. 

CHEWEY, ASHLEY M. CHEWEY, AND 

JAMES KRENN, on behalf of themselves 

and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AT&T MOBILTY LLC, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:15-cv-3418-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

 Honorable Edward M. Chen 

 

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

 Court Processes:

☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

☐ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

 Private Process:

 Private ADR (please identify process and provider): Private mediation with the 

provider to be mutually agreed to by the parties. 

 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

 

 other requested deadline: Within 90 days of any Court ruling denying Defendant’s 

pending Motion to Compel Arbitration. 

Dated: December 14, 2015 By: /s/ Michael W. Sobol 

 Michael W. Sobol 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: December 14, 2015 By: /s/ Donald M. Falk 

 Donald M. Falk 

 Attorney for Defendant 

Case 3:15-cv-03418-EMC Document 42 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 3
1283724.1 

ATTESTATION 

I, Michael W. Sobol, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used 

to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process. I hereby attest that Donald 

M. Falk has concurred in this filing. 

 

 /s/ Michael W. Sobol 

 Michael W. Sobol 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

☐ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

☐ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: __________________________________ 

 Honorable Edward M. Chen 

 

 

 

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11 

x

12/15/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-03418-EMC Document 42 Filed 12/15/15 Page 2 of 3
1283724.1 

 Page 2 of 2 

Case 3:15-cv-03418-EMC Document 42 Filed 12/15/15 Page 3 of 3