Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00063/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00063-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 12:635 Breach of Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERT W. O'CONNOR, ESQ. (CA #096547)

MARY E. OLDEN (CA #109373)

TODD M. BAILEY (CA#109519)

McDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN PC

Attorneys at Law

555 Capitol Mall, 9th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Phone: 916.444.3900

Fax: 916.442.2780

Attorneys for ST. PAUL FIRE AND

MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE

COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation with its

principal place of business in Minnesota,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAULDIN-DORFMEIER CONSTRUCTION

COMPANY, INC., a California corporation with

its principal place of business in California;

PATRICK K. MAULDIN, a California citizen,

individually and as trustee of THE PATRICK

AND VALERIE MAULDIN LIVING TRUST;

VALERIE MAULDIN, a California citizen,

individually and as trustee of THE PATRICK

AND VALERIE MAULDIN LIVING TRUST;

ALAN F. DORFMEIER, a California citizen,

individually and as trustee of THE 1993

DORFMEIER FAMILY TRUST; MARY

EILEEN DORFMEIER, a California citizen,

individually and as trustee of THE 1993

DORFMEIER FAMILY TRUST,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:05-cv-00063-AWI-LJO

STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO

RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIM

[No Hearing Required]

and related counterclaim

)

)

)

Case 1:05-cv-00063-AWI-LJO Document 130 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Having considered the agreement to the terms of this order by plaintiff and

counterdefendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company ("Plaintiff") and defendants and

counterclaimants Mauldin-Dorfmeier Construction Company, Inc., Alan F. Dorfmeier and

Patrick K. Mauldin ("Defendants"), through counsel, as is evidenced by the signatures of counsel

below, having been informed that Plaintiff and Defendants stipulated in the "Stipulation

Extending Time to Respond to Counterclaim," filed August 15, 2005, to extend the time for

Plaintiff to respond to the "Counterclaim for Breach of Contract; Breach of Implied Covenant of

Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Negligence; Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic

Advantage; Negligent Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage; Volunteerism; Breach

of Contract re: General Indemnity Agreement, For Declaratory Relief and for Objection to

Claims" (the "Counterclaim"), filed July 29, 2005, from August 22, 2005 to and including

Augusts 26, 2005, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED, pursuant to Local Rule 6-144, that the time for Plaintiff to respond to the

Counterclaim is extended from August 26, 2005 to and including September 8, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 29, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00063-AWI-LJO Document 130 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 2