Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00554/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00554-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEON JEROME MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-0554 DAD PS

ORDER

On February 20, 2015, the court denied in part and granted in part defendants’ motion for 

reconsideration.1 (Dkt. No. 45.) That order also directed defendants “to file a proposed stipulated 

protective order and serve of copy of that proposed stipulated protective order on the plaintiff.” 

(Id. at 2.) On February 27, 2015, defendants filed a proposed stipulated protective order. (Dkt. 

No. 46.) Defendants, however, did not file a proof of service with that proposed protective order. 

Therefore, the court cannot determine if defendants have served a copy of the proposed stipulated 

protective order on the plaintiff.

/////

/////

/////

 

1

 The parties have previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(c)(1). (Dkt. No. 21.)

Case 2:14-cv-00554-AC Document 51 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, defendants shall file a proof of service of the proposed stipulated protective 

order on the plaintiff within 7 days of the date of this order.2 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 2, 2015

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.consent\martin0554.service.ord.docx

 

2

 If it appears from the proof of service filed by defendants that plaintiff had not previously been 

served with a copy of the proposed stipulated protective order, plaintiff shall have fourteen days 

after being served with a copy of defendants’ proposed stipulated protective order to file

objections, if any, to the defendants’ proposed stipulated protective order. 

Case 2:14-cv-00554-AC Document 51 Filed 04/03/15 Page 2 of 2