Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01100/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01100-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL S. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. CARLTON, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:11-cv-1100 TLN KJN P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed December 12, 2013, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On August 20, 2014, plaintiff was granted an 

additional sixty days in which to file an amended complaint. Sixty days from that date have now 

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s 

order.1

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current

////

 

1

 On September 12, 2014, plaintiff filed untimely objections to the July 11, 2014 findings and 

recommendations. (ECF No. 29.) The findings and recommendations were vacated by the 

August 20, 2014 order. (ECF No. 28.) Moreover, in his objections, plaintiff stated that he would 

be released from Los Angeles County custody on September 16, 2014, and sought an extension of 

time until October 16, 2014, to file an amended complaint. The court granted plaintiff until 

October 20, 2014, in which to file his amended complaint. 

Case 2:11-cv-01100-TLN-KJN Document 30 Filed 10/28/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 

the party is fully effective.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: October 28, 2014

/davi1100.fta2

Case 2:11-cv-01100-TLN-KJN Document 30 Filed 10/28/14 Page 2 of 2