Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-04878/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-04878-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

CASE NO. 4:08-CV-4878 CW (EDL)

STIPULATION SHORTENING TIME FOR MTN FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MTN TO COMPEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JAY SMITH (California Bar No. 166105)

(Email: js@gslaw.org)

ADRIAN BARNES (California Bar No. 253131)

(Email: abarnes@gslaw.org)

LINDA S. FANG (California Bar No. 240245)

(Email: lfang@gslaw.org)

GILBERT & SACKMAN, A Law Corporation

3699 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1200

Los Angeles, California 90010

Tel: (323) 938-3000, Fax: (323) 937-9139

STEVEN A. MARTINO (pro hac vice)

(Email: stevemartino@taylormartino.com)

W. LLOYD COPELAND (pro hac vice)

(Email: lloyd@taylormartino.com)

KASIE M. BRASWELL (pro hac vice)

(Email: kasie@taylormartino.com)

TAYLOR MARTINO ZARZAUR, P.C.

51 St. Joseph Street

Mobile, Alabama 36602

Tel: (251) 433-3131, Fax: (251) 405-5080

GREGORY HAWLEY (pro hac vice)

(Email: ghawley@waadlaw.com)

U. W. CLEMON (pro hac vice)

(Email: uwclemon@waadlaw.com)

CHRISTOPHER J. NICHOLSON (pro hac vice)

(Email: cnicholson@waadlaw.com)

REBECCA G. DEPALMA (pro hac vice)

(Email: rdepalma@whitearnolddowd.com)

WHITE ARNOLD & DOWD, P.C.

2025 Third Avenue North, Suite 500

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Tel: (205) 323-1888, Fax: (205) 323-8907

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Wanda Greenwood,

Ladelle Hatfield, and Deborah McCleese

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WANDA GREENWOOD, LADELLE HATFIELD, 

and DEBORAH MCCLEESE, on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMPUCREDIT CORPORATION; COLUMBUS 

BANK AND TRUST, jointly and individually,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:08-cv-4878 CW (EDL)

Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte for Discovery Matters

STIPULATION SHORTENING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT COMPUCREDIT

CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER AND PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER 

RESPONSES FROM COMPUCREDIT TO 

THIRD SET OF REQUESTS FOR 

PRODUCTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case 4:08-cv-04878-CW Document 253 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 3 Case4:08-cv-04878-CW Document248 Filed05/17/10 Page1 of 4
CASE NO. 4:08-CV-4878 CW (EDL) 1

STIPULATION SHORTENING TIME FOR MTN FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MTN TO COMPEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiffs and Defendant CompuCredit Corporation (“CompuCredit”) 

(collectively, “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel further responses from CompuCredit to their 

second set of requests for production of documents on May 11, 2010, and scheduled the hearing on this 

motion for June 15, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., in accordance with Civil L.R. 7-2;

WHEREAS, the Parties stipulated to allow Plaintiffs to take an additional 30(b)(6) deposition of 

CompuCredit and scheduled this deposition for May 21, 2010;

WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have met and conferred about the scope and topics for this 

deposition and cannot agree on seven of the 23 topics set forth in the notice of deposition;

WHEREAS, CompuCredit filed a motion for protective order on May 13, 2010;

WHEREAS, the parties desire to resolve this issue prior to the deposition of CompuCredit;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to continue the deposition to the week of June 21, 2010;

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding CompuCredit’s responses to Plaintiffs’ 

third set of requests for production of documents and cannot agree on certain requests and/or objections;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs plan to file a motion to compel further responses from CompuCredit to 

their third set of requests for production of documents;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in the interest of judicial economy and the preservation of 

the parties’ resources for these matters to be heard by the Court as soon as possible and at the same time;

WHEREAS, since the inception of the case in October 2008, the parties have either stipulated or 

moved the Court for time modifications on approximately ten occasions; and

WHEREAS, the time modification requested herein will not adversely affect the schedule for the 

case, or shorten the Court’s time to review the papers filed in connection with these motions, and will 

instead allow the parties to move forward in an expeditious manner.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree and stipulate that:

1. CompuCredit’s motion for protective order shall be briefed and heard on shortened time,

on June 15, 2010, at the same time as Plaintiffs’ motion to compel further responses to their second set 

of requests for production of documents. Any opposition to CompuCredit’s motion shall be filed no 

later than May 27, 2010, and any reply shall be filed no later than June 1, 2010.

Case 4:08-cv-04878-CW Document 253 Filed 05/24/10 Page 2 of 3 Case4:08-cv-04878-CW Document248 Filed05/17/10 Page2 of 4
CASE NO. 4:08-CV-4878 CW (EDL) 2

STIPULATION SHORTENING TIME FOR MTN FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MTN TO COMPEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Plaintiffs shall file a motion to compel further responses from CompuCredit to their third 

set of requests for production of documents no later than May 19, 2010, and this motion shall also be 

briefed and heard on shortened time, on June 15, 2010. Any opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion shall be 

filed no later than May 27, 2010, and any reply shall be filed no later than June 1, 2010.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: May 17, 2010 Jay Smith (CA Bar No. 166105)

Adrian Barnes (CA Bar No. 253131)

Linda S. Fang (CA Bar No. 240245)

GILBERT & SACKMAN

A LAW CORPORATION

Steven A. Martino (pro hac vice)

W. Lloyd Copeland (pro hac vice)

Kasie M. Braswell (pro hac vice)

TAYLOR MARTINO ZARZAUR, P.C.

Gregory Hawley (pro hac vice)

U. W. Clemon (pro hac vice)

Christopher J. Nicholson (pro hac vice)

Rebecca G. DePalma (pro hac vice)

WHITE ARNOLD & DOWD, P.C.

By:

Linda S. Fang

s/ Linda S. Fang

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Wanda Greenwood, Ladelle 

Hatfield, and Deborah McCleese

DATED: May 17, 2010 Susan L. Germaise (CA Bar No. 176595)

David L. Hartsell (pro hac vice)

MCGUIREWOODS LLP

By: 

Susan L. Germaise

 s/ Susan L. Germaise

Attorneys for Defendant CompuCredit Corporation

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________ __________________________________________

Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

Case4:08-cv-04878-CW Document248 Filed05/17/10 Page3 of 4

May 24, 2010

Case 4:08-cv-04878-CW Document 253 Filed 05/24/10 Page 3 of 3