Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06468/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06468-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT HAMBY,

Plaintiff,

v.

A.K. SCRIBNER, et al.,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:04-cv-6468 OWW DLB P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 17)

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS (DOC. 14)

Plaintiff, Scott Hamby (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding with counsel, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On February 1, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. On February 21, 2006, defendants filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

Case 1:04-cv-06468-OWW -DLB Document 19 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 1,

2006, are ADOPTED IN PART;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted, filed May 26, 2005, is

DENIED; except as to the allegations against Supervising

Defendants Scribner, Yarborough and Moore, which are conclusory

and devoid of facts showing personal participation, knowledge and

ratification or establishment, implementation of, or recklessly

disregardful of a policy operating to deprive Plaintiff of

constitutional rights. The motion to dismiss as to these three

defendants is GRANTED with leave to amend;

3. Paragraph B(5) of the Prayer in the Complaint is

STRICKEN; 

4. Any amended complaint shall be filed within ten (10)

days following receipt of this order; and 

5. If no amendment is filed, remaining defendants shall

respond to Plaintiff’s complaint within thirty (30) days

following date of service of this order or, if an amended

complaint is filed, within forty (40) days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06468-OWW -DLB Document 19 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 2