Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00027/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00027-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HASAN ADNAN YAGHOUB, No. 2:07-cv-00027-MCE-GGH P

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

FOLSOM STATE PRISON 

WARDEN, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On October 22, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner did not file

objections to the findings and recommendations. On January 8, 2007, this court adopted the

findings and recommendations and judgment was entered.

///

///

Case 2:07-cv-00027-MCE -GGH Document 21 Filed 04/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On February 19, 2008, petitioner filed a request for extension of time to file objections

and objections to the October 22, 2007, findings and recommendations. The court construes the

request for extension of time as a request for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b). Petitioner states that prison officials apparently failed to mail his objections to the court. 

Good cause appearing, petitioner’s request for relief from judgment is granted.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304,

this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

including petitioner’s objections, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s February 19, 2008, request for extension of time to file objections,

construed as a request for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), is granted; the

January 8, 2008, judgment is vacated;

2. The findings and recommendations filed October 22, 2007, are adopted in full; and

3. Petitioner’s application for a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. 

Dated: April 4, 2008

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00027-MCE -GGH Document 21 Filed 04/04/08 Page 2 of 2