Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-04926/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-04926-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 1 -

Case No.

C 12-04926 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MSJ AND CONTINUING TRIAL DATE

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA

EIGHTEENTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

ROBERT C. FRIESE (Bar #52392)

JOSEPH V. MAUCH (Bar #253693)

ROEY Z. RAHMIL (Bar #273803)

One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-3598

Telephone: (415) 421-6500

Facsimile: (415) 421-2922

Attorneys for Plaintiff ZARIKA SOMAYA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ZARIKA SOMAYA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF INDIA,

Defendant.

Case No. C 12-04926 CRB

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AND CONTINUING TRIAL 

DATE

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

WHEREAS, in light of the holidays and the parties’ and their counsel’s schedules, the 

parties agree that additional time is appropriate to complete the briefing on Defendant Bank of 

India’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that the outcome of the Bank’s Motion For Summary 

Judgment may affect the issues to be tried; and 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid imposing on the Court and each other the necessity 

and burden of preparing this case for trial prior to resolution of the Bank’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment; and

WHEREAS, there have been no prior continuances of the trial date in this action;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that: 

Case 3:12-cv-04926-CRB Document 48 Filed 01/07/14 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Case No.

C 12-04926 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MSJ AND CONTINUING TRIAL DATE

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA

EIGHTEENTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598

1. Plaintiff Zarika Somaya’s Opposition to the Bank’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment should be due by January 17, 2014; 

2. Defendant Bank of India’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment 

shall be due by January 24, 2014; and

3. The hearing on Defendant Bank of India’s Motion for Summary Judgment shall 

be on January 31, 2014, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court; 

4. The trial date in this action should be postponed for a period of approximately 60 

days or such other time as the Court deems appropriate; and

5. Pretrial dates shall be adjusted accordingly.

Dated: January 30, 2013 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

 /s/ Robert C. Friese

By: ROBERT C. FRIESE

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JITU SOMAYA and 

ZARIKA SOMAYA

Dated: December 30, 2013 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITMAN LLP

/s/MICHAEL J. KASS

By: 

MICHAEL KASS

Attorneys for Defendant BANK OF INDIA

Case 3:12-cv-04926-CRB Document 48 Filed 01/07/14 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 3 -

Case No.

C 12-04926 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MSJ AND CONTINUING TRIAL DATE

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA

EIGHTEENTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

1. Plaintiff Zarika Somaya’s Opposition to the Bank’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment shall be due by January 17, 2014; 

2. Defendant Bank of India’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment 

shall be due by January 24, 2014; 

3. The hearing on Defendant Bank of India’s Motion for Summary Judgment shall 

be on January 31, 2014; 

4. The trial in this action shall be postponed until May 12, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.; and 

5. Pretrial conference held May 6, 2014 at 2:30 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:12-cv-04926-CRB Document 48 Filed 01/07/14 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 4 -

Case No.

C 12-04926 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MSJ AND CONTINUING TRIAL DATE

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA

EIGHTEENTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3598

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from all other signatories thereto. 

Dated: January 30, 2013 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

 /s/ Robert C. Friese________ 

By: ROBERT C. FRIESE

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JITU SOMAYA and 

ZARIKA SOMAYA

08418\001\4116435.v2

Case 3:12-cv-04926-CRB Document 48 Filed 01/07/14 Page 4 of 4