Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01804/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01804-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TURAN RAMADAN AND PATRICIA

RAMADAN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF NAPA, PHIL BRUN, MICHAEL

O’BRYON, and Does 1-100, 

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 06-01804 MHP

ORDER

At the May 21, 2007 hearing, the court announced its intention to order the parties to refrain

from certain conduct that would interfere with the resolution of the instant action. The parties,

unable to agree upon the scope of the order, submitted proposed orders to the court. 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

1) Plaintiff Turan Ramadan is henceforth prohibited from initiating or engaging in any

discussion of the instant action with defendants or their employees in the workplace.

2) Defendants City of Napa, Phil Brun and Michael O’Bryon shall not investigate any future

claims brought against Turan Ramadan related to this suit except: 

a) Defendants are permitted to complete any pending investigations against Turan

Ramadan. Should any pending investigation result in the issuance of a Notice of Intent to discipline,

then any further proceedings are stayed until the resolution of defendant’s motion for summary

judgment. No hearing or disciplinary action shall take place until the court has issued its order on the

summary judgment motion. 

Case 3:06-cv-01804-MHP Document 33 Filed 06/01/07 Page 1 of 2
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

b) Defendants may investigate any future claims brought against Turan Ramadan

unrelated to the instant action. Defendants are directed to bring to these matters to the court’s

attention for further proceedings consistent with this order. 

3) Defendants are further prohibited from initiating or engaging in any discussion of the

instant action with Turan Ramadan in the workplace except through formal discovery or in

connection with the pending investigations as outlined above.

Any party in violation of the court’s order will be deemed in contempt of court.

Dated: May 30, 2007 _______________________________

MARILYN HALL PATEL

United States District Court Judge

Northern District of California

Case 3:06-cv-01804-MHP Document 33 Filed 06/01/07 Page 2 of 2