Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01918/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01918-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARRISON S. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:10-CV-01918-LJO-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

(DOC. 23)

Plaintiff Garrison Johnson (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants Cate

and Harrington. On July 18, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Doc. 18. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

302.

On November 17, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within twenty-one days. Doc. 23. No party filed a timely

Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 17, 2011, is adopted in full;

1

Case 1:10-cv-01918-LJO-DLB Document 24 Filed 01/11/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed July 18, 2011, is granted;

3. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed October 14, 2010, is dismissed for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted; and

4. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a first amended complaint within thirty (30) days

from the date of service of this order. Failure to timely file or otherwise respond to

this order will result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order and

failure to state a claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-01918-LJO-DLB Document 24 Filed 01/11/12 Page 2 of 2