Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02186/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02186-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 

---

F 1 LED r 1n . d r. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

L •• ,re .::iraces Court of Ap'""" 1 . T I r~a .5 .. ~nu (irn1i, 

FEB l 2 i990 

XOBERT L. HOECKER 

I n Re: DURABILITY, INC., ) 

) 

Debtor, ) 

) 

) 

JAMES R. ADELMAN, ) 

) 

v . ) 

) 

FOURTH NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST ) 

COMPANY, N. A. , of Tulsa, OK:, ) 

) 

Appellee, ) 

) 

FRED R. PALMER, SR . , ) 

) 

Appellant. ) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Clerk · 

No. 88-2186 

(D.C. No. 87-C-627) 

(N.D. Okla.) 

Before MOORE, BARRETT, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a): 10th Cir. R. 34 . 1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36 . 3. 

Appellate Case: 88-2186 Document: 01019963047 Date Filed: 02/12/1990 Page: 1 
Fred I. Palmer appeals from a district court order affirming 

an order of the bankruptcy court that subordinated his claims 

against debtor, Durability, Inc., to competing interests asserted 

by the Fourth National Bank and Trust Co. of Tulsa, Oklahoma. We 

note that our jurisdiction over this appeal derives from 

appellant's timely compliance with our previous order issued 

January 4, 1990, granting appellant thirty days in which to secure 

the determination 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), 

Bankr. R. 7054(a). 

and direction 

applicable herein 

called 

by 

for 

virtue 

by 

of 

Upon consideration of the issues raised on this appeal, we 

conclude that the analysis and disposition of the district court 

are correct. Accordingly, we affirm for substantially the reasons 

stated in the district court's order. 

The judgment of the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 88-2186 Document: 01019963047 Date Filed: 02/12/1990 Page: 2