Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-00193/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-00193-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROP.] ORDER 

Master File No.: 3:18-cv-00193-EMC 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 

SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB No. 126930) 

smuck@fenwick.com 

CATHERINE D. KEVANE (CSB No. 215501) 

ckevane@fenwick.com 

MARIE C. BAFUS (CSB No. 258417) 

mbafus@fenwick.com 

VINCENT BARREDO (CSB No. 275518) 

vbarredo@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415.875.2300 

Facsimile: 415.281.1350 

Attorneys for Defendants GoPro, Inc., Nicholas D. 

Woodman and Brian T. McGee 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JONG MIN PARK, Individually and on Behalf 

of All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GOPRO, INC., NICHOLAS D. WOODMAN 

AND BRIAN T. MCGEE, 

Defendants. 

Master File No.: 3:18-cv-00193-EMC 

CLASS ACTION 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR 

FILING RESPONSE TO 

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND 

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED 

DEADLINES 

Date Action Filed: January 11, 2018 

(modified)

Case 3:18-cv-00193-EMC Document 66 Filed 05/11/18 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROP.] ORDER 1 Master File No.: 3:18-cv-00193-EMC 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 

WHEREAS, this action is a proposed class action alleging violations of the federal 

securities laws against GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro” or the “Company”), Nicholas Woodman and Brian 

McGee (collectively, “Defendants”); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 

104-67, 109 Stat. 737 (1995) (the “Reform Act”), which sets forth specialized procedures for the 

administration of securities class actions, on April 19, 2018, this Court issued a Minute Order 

conditionally appointing Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel and ordering that the Consolidated 

Amended Complaint be filed within 60 days (i.e., June 18, 2018) (Dkt. No. 58); 

WHEREAS, on April 26, 2018 the Court gave final approval of the appointment of Julie 

Wiegand and Michael Birlenbach as Lead Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 62); 

WHEREAS, following appointment of Lead Plaintiffs and their counsel, the parties have 

met and conferred and agreed on a schedule for Defendants’ responses to the Consolidated 

Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the proposed briefing schedule, the parties respectfully submit 

that good cause exists to vacate the July 12, 2018 initial case management conference and 

associated ADR deadlines until such time as the Court has the opportunity to rule on Defendants’ 

anticipated motion to dismiss; and 

IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, by and between the 

undersigned counsel for the parties, that: 

1. Defendants shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the Consolidated Amended 

Complaint on or before August 17, 2018; 

2. In the event that Defendants file a motion to dismiss, Lead Plaintiffs shall file an 

opposition to the motion on or before October 1, 2018; 

3. Defendants shall file any reply on or before November 1, 2018; 

4. Defendants’ anticipated motion to dismiss shall be noticed for hearing on 

December 6, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.; and 

5. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-2, the initial case management conference scheduled for 

July 12, 2018 shall be vacated, along with any associated deadlines under the Federal Rules of 

12 August 23, September 6

September 20

Case 3:18-cv-00193-EMC Document 66 Filed 05/11/18 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROP.] ORDER 

2 Master File No.: 3:18-cv-00193-EMC 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 

Civil Procedure and Local Rules, to be rescheduled for a date after the Court rules on Defendants’ 

anticipated motion to dismiss, as the Court determines to be appropriate; and all associated ADR 

Multi-Option Program deadlines likewise be deferred. 

6. Neither Plaintiffs nor Defendants waive their rights to seek from each other or the 

Court adjournments or extensions of the above deadlines. 

Dated: May 2, 2018 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Catherine D. Kevane

 Catherine D. Kevane 

Attorneys for Defendants GoPro, Inc., Nicholas D. 

Woodman and Brian T. McGee 

Dated: May 2, 2018 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 

By: /s/ Jacob Goldberg 

 Jacob Goldberg 

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs Julie Wiegand and 

Michael Birlenbach 

Dated: May 2, 2018 POMERANTZ LLP 

By: /s/ Leigh H. Smollar 

 Leigh H. Smollar 

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs Julie Wiegand and 

Michael Birlenbach 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), all signatories concur in filing this stipulation. 

 Dated: May 2, 2018 By: /s/ Catherine D. Kevane 

 Catherine D. Kevane 

* * * 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

United States District Judge 

September 20, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. (modified) May 11, 2018

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:18-cv-00193-EMC Document 66 Filed 05/11/18 Page 3 of 3