Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03230/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03230-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAFAEL SANDOVAL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

M1 AUTO COLLISIONS CENTERS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-03230-EDL 

FURTHER ORDER RE: DISCOVERY 

LETTER

Re: Dkt. No. 212

On April 29, 2016, the Parties filed a joint letter outlining several outstanding discovery 

disputes. On May 6, 2016, the Court issued an order on the Parties’ joint letter which, in part, granted 

Defendants leave to file a brief declaration responsive to Plaintiffs’ April 29, 2016 declaration from 

Aaron Woolfson. On May 12, 2016, in lieu of a declaration, Defendants filed a letter requesting that 

the Court “consider the testimony already given by Mr. Alex Assts . . . as well as the omnibus 

declaration of Riaz Danekari submitted in opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel.” (Dkt. 215 at 

1.) On May 16, 2016, Plaintiffs filed objections to Defendants’ letter and requested leave to file a 

rebuttal.

Even without considering Defendants’ letter, Plaintiffs’ speculative Woolfson declaration,

which is not based on personal knowledge of Defendants’ systems, fails to establish that drives 

with Shopman data remain. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ request for further discovery regarding the 

Shopman database is denied and Plaintiffs’ objections are denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 16, 2016

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-03230-EDL Document 218 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 1