Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00583/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00583-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY MCKINNEY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

A. HEDGPETH, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:08-cv-00583-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

SEND FORM FOR CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On June 30, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendations recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for

failure to state a claim upon which habeas relief can be granted. (Doc. 6). The Findings and

Recommendations was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within twenty days from the date of service of that order. On July 23, 2008, Petitioner filed

objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 7). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Case 1:08-cv-00583-LJO-TAG Document 8 Filed 09/10/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued June 30, 2008 (Doc. 6), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; 

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file; and,

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a standard form for claims pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1984.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 9, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00583-LJO-TAG Document 8 Filed 09/10/08 Page 2 of 2