Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00175/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00175-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUSTIN MICHAEL THUEMLER,

Petitioner,

v.

STANISLAUS COUNTY,

Respondent.

1:16-cv-00175 MJS HC 

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO 

FILE RESPONSE TO PETITIONER’S 

SECOND AMENDED PETITION

(Doc. 18)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

The Court previously conducted a preliminary review of the petition and ordered 

Respondent to file a response. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss on April 8, 2016. 

However, Petitioner had previously moved to amend his petition. (ECF No. 11.) The 

Court granted the motion to amend, and Petitioner filed a second amended petition on 

August 22, 2016. (ECF No. 18.) Having reviewed the amended petition it is not clear 

from the face of the Petition whether Petitioner is entitled to relief. 28 U.S.C. § 2243.

///

///

///

Case 1:16-cv-00175-MJS Document 19 Filed 08/25/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Respondent is provided thirty (30) 

days to review the amended petition and submit a renewed response to the Petition. The 

response and deadlines for related pleadings should otherwise conform to the rules set 

forth in the Court’s prior scheduling order issued on February 8, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 25, 2016 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00175-MJS Document 19 Filed 08/25/16 Page 2 of 2