Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01676/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01676-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OTMAR WITTINE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-1676 LKK EFB P

vs.

F. T. DESCHLER, et al., ORDER AND

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel suing for alleged civil rights

violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 3, 2007, the court directed plaintiff to file a

pretrial statement within 30 days. Plaintiff has not filed a pretrial statement or otherwise

responded to that order. Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 11-110.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants are relieved

from filing a pretrial statement pending further order of the court.

Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 11-110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

Case 2:03-cv-01676-LKK -EFB Document 47 Filed 01/31/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 31, 2008.

Case 2:03-cv-01676-LKK -EFB Document 47 Filed 01/31/08 Page 2 of 2