Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00569/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00569-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

K. JAMEL WALKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:09-cv-0569 WBS KJN P

ORDER

On March 6, 2015 defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (ECF No. 60.) Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. 

Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 

opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 

the granting of the motion . . . .” On September 14, 2012, plaintiff was advised of the 

requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may 

be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 38.) In addition, defendants’ motion 

for summary judgment includes the notice to plaintiff required under Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 

952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc).

Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for 

imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of 

Case 2:09-cv-00569-WBS-KJN Document 61 Filed 07/01/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court.” In the order filed September 14, 2012, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply 

with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of 

this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. Failure 

to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Dated: July 1, 2015

/walk0569.46.osc

Case 2:09-cv-00569-WBS-KJN Document 61 Filed 07/01/15 Page 2 of 2