Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00070/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00070-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARVIN B. CARROLL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

B. GRICEWICH, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:07-cv-00070-AWI-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND

DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS

(Doc. 23)

Plaintiff Arvin B. Carroll (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 22, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. To date,

plaintiff has not filed any objection to the Findings and

Recommendations.

//

Case 1:07-cv-00070-AWI-GSA Document 32 Filed 07/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 22, 2007,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s original

complaint, filed January 16, 2007, against defendants

Gricewich and Peiffer under section 1983 for

retaliation; and,

3. Plaintiff’s denial of access to the courts claim, due

process claim, and equal protection claim are DISMISSED

from this action for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00070-AWI-GSA Document 32 Filed 07/27/07 Page 2 of 2