Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00433/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00433-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DERRICK ELLIOT BAMER,

Plaintiff,

v.

SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER, CASTRO 

VALLEY,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-00433-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Case management statement due September 30, 2015

Case management conference October 14, 2015 at 

2:00 p.m.

Expert disclosures December 4, 2015

Expert rebuttal December 18, 2015

Expert and fact discovery cut-off January 29, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions March 4, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due May 17, 2016 

Pretrial conference May 27, 2016 at 2:00 

p.m.

Case 3:15-cv-00433-JST Document 22 Filed 05/06/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Trial June 20, 2016 at 8:30 

a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) 10 days

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 6, 2015

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00433-JST Document 22 Filed 05/06/15 Page 2 of 2