Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00269/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00269-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT C. BRUCE,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00269-AWI-SKO PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT

SANCHEZ

(Doc. 88)

Plaintiff Vincent C. Bruce (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 21, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations

which recommended that Defendant Sanchez be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to effect service

of process on him. (Doc. #88.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and

contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be

filed within thirty (30) days of the date on which the Findings and Recommendations were served. 

Plaintiff filed objections on October 25, 2010. (Doc. #91.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 305, this Court

has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

1

Case 1:07-cv-00269-BAM Document 93 Filed 12/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 

1. The September 21, 2010 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full;

2. Defendant Sanchez is DISMISSED under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) due

to Plaintiff’s failure to effect service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 15, 2010 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2

Case 1:07-cv-00269-BAM Document 93 Filed 12/15/10 Page 2 of 2