Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00877/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00877-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on December 28, 2005, as 1

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Paroled. However, plaintiff has not

notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully

effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN FRANCIS NABOONE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CLOSE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00877-REC-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 15)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, John Francis Naboone (“plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On November 3, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were inadvertently not served on

plaintiff until December 7, 2005, but which contained notice to

plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation

were to be filed within thirty (30) days. To date, plaintiff has

not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:05-cv-00877-REC-DLB Document 17 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed November 3,

2005, are ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on plaintiff’s failure

to obey the court’s order of September 22, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00877-REC-DLB Document 17 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2