Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00966/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00966-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL EDWIN HULL,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0966 RRB DAD P

vs.

JAMES WALKER, WARDEN,

et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed October 3, 2007, petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus was

dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended petition was granted. The thirty day period

has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the

court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:07-cv-00966-JKS-DAD Document 10 Filed 12/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 30, 2007.

DAD:lg

hull0966.fta

Case 2:07-cv-00966-JKS-DAD Document 10 Filed 12/03/07 Page 2 of 2