Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01030/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01030-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CYNTHIA HOPSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

NEOX CLOTHING AND SHOES, NEO 

CATS, INC., and JMJ BROTHERS 

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,

 Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-1030-DAD-EPG

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR 

FAILURE TO APPEAR

On July 3, 2015, Plaintiff Cynthia Hopson (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in this action. 

(ECF No. 1.) On November 17, 2015, this Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to correct 

deficiencies in the service of the Complaint and appear before the Court on January 20, 2016 at 

9:00 a.m. for a staus conference. (ECF No. 13.) The order further explained that, if Defendants 

had answered the Complaint before the date of the status conference, the status conference would 

be converted to a scheduling conference and the parties would be required to file a joint 

scheduling report in advance of the conference. (ECF No. 13.) 

The Court held a status conference on January 20, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff failed to 

appear for the hearing and did not file any request for a continuance or otherwise notify the Court 

that she would not be able to appear at the conference. Accordingly, the Court orders that 

Case 1:15-cv-01030-DAD-EPG Document 18 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff show cause why sanctions, up to and including dismissal, should not be issued for her

failure to comply with this Court’s orders and for her failure to prosecute this case. 

No later than January 27, 2016, Plaintiff is ORDERED file a written response to this 

Order to Show Cause indicating whether she intends to pursue this action and to explain her

failure to appear at the status conference on January 20, 2016. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure 

to respond to this Order as set forth above may result in the dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 21, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01030-DAD-EPG Document 18 Filed 01/21/16 Page 2 of 2