Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_98-cv-00114/USCOURTS-caed-2_98-cv-00114-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDY L. KIDWELL, No. CIV S-98-0114 MCE PAN P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

SUE L. HUBBARD, ET AL., 

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

General Order No. 262.

On February 2, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:98-cv-00114-MCE -PAN Document 83 Filed 08/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Petitioner was granted extensions of time to file objections to

the findings and recommendations on March 9, 2005, April 20,

2005, and May 31, 2005. On July 12, 2005, petitioner filed

objections to the findings and recommendations and a motion for

discovery and an evidentiary hearing.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 2, 2005,

are adopted in full; 

2. Petitioner’s July 12, 2005, motion for discovery and

evidentiary hearing is denied; and

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. 

DATE: August 15, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:98-cv-00114-MCE -PAN Document 83 Filed 08/15/05 Page 2 of 2