Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00115/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00115-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODNEI FRAZIER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0115 MCE PAN P

vs.

DR. JOHN KOFOED,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In plaintiff’s reply, filed February 28, 2006, plaintiff complained

he did not receive Dr. Kofoed’s responses to discovery requests. However, plaintiff attached a

copy of Dr. Kofoed’s discovery responses as Exhibit H. On October 19, 2005, plaintiff filed a

motion to compel discovery contending Dr. Kofoed’s responses were insufficient. The court

denied that motion to compel by order filed November 23, 2005.

On August 11, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for admissions. Plaintiff is advised

that discovery is closed. Moreover, plaintiff had access to his prison central and medical files

and filed detailed opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment as well as his own

motion for summary judgment. There was no further need for discovery prior to ruling on

defendant Kofoed’s motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for

Case 2:04-cv-00115-MCE -PAN Document 74 Filed 08/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

admissions will be placed in the court file and disregarded. Plaintiff shall file no further

discovery requests in this action. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s February 28, 2006

request to reopen discovery is denied.

DATED: August 17, 2006.

/001; fraz0115.dsc

Case 2:04-cv-00115-MCE -PAN Document 74 Filed 08/18/06 Page 2 of 2