Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01766/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01766-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING INTEL'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL TO FILE RECENT

DECISION—No. C-05-01766 RMW

MAG

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 3/19/08

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant.

No. C-05-01766 RMW

ORDER GRANTING INTEL'S

MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE

REQUEST FOR APPROVAL TO FILE

RECENT DECISION

[Re Docket No. 133]

Defendant Intel Corporation ("Intel") seeks the court's approval to submit as important

precedent the decision of the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S.

___, 127 S. Ct. 1727 (2007), in support of Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of

U.S. Patent No. 5,072,369. Plaintiff Computer Cache Coherency Corporation does not oppose the

court's consideration of the KSR decision. The court will therefore grant Intel's request. As there

appears to be no opposition to doing so, the court will also consider Intel's argument regarding the

impact of the case on the motion for summary judgment and CCCC's response to Intel's argument. 

DATED: 3/18/08

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01766-RMW Document 167 Filed 03/19/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING INTEL'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL TO FILE RECENT

DECISION—No. C-05-01766 RMW

MAG 2

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

Roderick G. Dorman dormanr@hbdlawyers.com

Lawrence M. Hadley hadleyl@hbdlawyers.com

Omer Salik saliko@hbdlawyers.com

Counsel for Defendants:

James P. Bennett jbennett@mofo.com

Juanita R. Brooks brooks@fr.com

Joseph V Colaianni , Jr Colaianni@fr.com

Paul Forrest Coyne pcoyne@mofo.com

John Michael Farrell jfarrell@fr.com

Karl J. Kramer kkramer@mofo.com,sdevol@mofo.com

Jennifer A. Ochs jochs@wsgr.com,lwang@wsgr.com

Timothy Wayne Riffe Riffe@fr.com,conway@fr.com,gwilliams@fr.com

Thomas L. Treffert TTreffert@mofo.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 3/19/08 /s/ MAG

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:05-cv-01766-RMW Document 167 Filed 03/19/08 Page 2 of 2