Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03773/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03773-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIVEOPS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

TELEO, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-05-3773 MJJ (EMC)

ORDER REGARDING APRIL 14, 2006

JOINT LETTER

(Docket No. 106)

Having considered the parties' joint letter dated April 14, 2006, the Court hereby orders that

Defendants may retain LiveOps' original § 2019 Disclosure Statement with strict adherence to the

"Attorneys and Consultants Only" designation pursuant to the Protective Order. During the March

31, 2006 telephonic hearing, the Court suggested that LiveOps prepare a revised § 2019 Disclosure

Statement as a means of making the Disclosure available for use in this litigation, beyond the limited

use by attorneys and consultants only. The revision was not intended, however, to supercede or

replace the original § 2019 Disclosure Statement altogether. Although LiveOps raises a concern

about inadvertent disclosure to Defendant Brown, LiveOps has not demonstrated an actual risk or

likelihood that the original Disclosure would be shared with Mr. Brown.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 17, 2006 ________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03773-MJJ Document 111 Filed 04/17/06 Page 1 of 1