Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02012/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02012-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 441
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Voting
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

C-04-2012 (JF HRL) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT - 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

STEVEN R. PREMINGER, et ano. 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ANTHONY PRINCIPI, et al 

 Defendants 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: C-04-2012 (JF HRL) 

CMC: June 14, 2006 

Time: 9 am 

Court: 3, 5th Floor, San Jose 

STIPULATION ADVANCING DATE. 

 Plaintiffs and defendants stipulate that the Case Management Conference 

scheduled for June 14, 2006 may be advanced to 9 A.M., June 7, 2006. 

KEVIN V. RYAN 

United States Attorney 

Dated: June 14, 2006 

OWEN P. MARTIKAN 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: April 21, 2006 

 electronic signature authorized 

SCOTT RAFFERTY 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

**E-filed 7/5/06** July July 7/6/06 IT IS SO ORDERED. JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 5:04-cv-02012-JF Document 115 Filed 07/06/06 Page 1 of 3
C-04-2012 (JF HRL) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT - 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

STEVEN R. PREMINGER, et ano. 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ANTHONY PRINCIPI, et al 

 Defendants 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: C-04-2012 (JF HRL) 

CMC: September 20, 2004 

Time: 10:30am 

Court: 3, 5th Floor, San Jose 

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT 

STATEMENT (DRAFTED BUT NOT 

FINALIZED BY DEFENDANTS). 

PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 

1. After consultation with Dr. Javaid Shiehk, counsel will schedule his 

deposition. In the absence of undue hardship to Dr. Shiehk, his 

deposition will occur on of before September 24, 2004. 

2. A settlement conference before a United States Magistrate Judge is 

scheduled for ___________. 

3. Defendants shall provide responsive patient-specific information to the 

extent it is subject to discovery for review by counsel, his assistance, and 

experts who are notified that this information may be used only in 

connection with this litigation. Other disclosures are punishable by 

contempt. Absent further leave of court, no identifiable patient 

information shall be filed in this Court. All copies and compilations of 

this information shall be returned to defendants or destroyed at the 

conclusion of this litigation. 

Case 5:04-cv-02012-JF Document 115 Filed 07/06/06 Page 2 of 3
C-04-2012 (JF HRL) CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT - 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

4. Dr. Rafferty will not be subject to deposition or to discovery in his 

individual capacity. 

5. The parties shall respond to all discovery requests within seven days. 

Absent further order of this Court, all discovery shall be completed by 

____________. 

6. Depositions may be tape-recorded, except to the extent that a party bears 

the cost of stenographic transcription. 

7. Any dispositive motion shall be filed by _______________. 

8. A trial date is set forth _________________, 2004. 

DATED: ____________ ______________________ 

Case 5:04-cv-02012-JF Document 115 Filed 07/06/06 Page 3 of 3