Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01358/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01358-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1145 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES P. DeFAZIO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1358 WBS GGH

vs.

HOLLISTER, INC., et al., DISCOVERY PLAN ORDER

Defendants. 

 /

Presently before the court is Defendants’ “Statement regarding the inapplicability

of the joint statement procedures to defendants’ October 17 and October 20, 2008 motions to

strike. Plaintiff Ellis has filed an opposition. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ October 22, 2008

request to proceed with their motions to strike experts in according with regular motion practice

under E.D. Local Rule 78-230, rather than under E. D. Local Rule 37-251, is granted.

Dated: 10/28/08

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

_____________________________

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:076/Defazio1358.230.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 415 Filed 10/28/08 Page 1 of 1