Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00034/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00034-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

-1-

REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No.: C08-0034 MMC 

P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Wimmer Excavating\Pleadings\C08-0034 MMV CMC Continuance Request 072508.DOC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607) 

Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) 

SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 882-7900 

(415) 882-9287 – Facsimile 

mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com

mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GIL CROSTHWAITE, et al., as Trustees of the 

OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH AND 

WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA, et al. 

Plaintiffs,

v.

TERRENCE WAYNE WIMMER, individually 

and dba WIMMER EXCAVATING aka 

WIMMER GENERAL ENGINEERING aka 

WIMMER, INC., 

Defendants.

Case No.: C08-0034 MMC 

REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Date: August 1, 2008 

Time: 10:30 a.m. 

Courtroom: 7, 19th Floor 

Judge: The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

 Plaintiffs hereby request that the Case Management Conference, currently set for August 1, 

2008, be continued. 

1. Default was entered by the Court on March 4, 2008. 

2. Plaintiffs’ auditor has recently issued its report of defendants’ records for the 

audited period of January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2007, finding additional amounts due. That 

report has been sent to the defendant for review and payment. 

///

; ORDER

THEREON

Case 3:08-cv-00034-MMC Document 22 Filed 07/28/08 Page 1 of 2
-2-

REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No.: C08-0034 MMC 

P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Wimmer Excavating\Pleadings\C08-0034 MMV CMC Continuance Request 072508.DOC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. Plaintiffs have begun preparing a Motion for Default Judgment in this action and 

will include the audit findings in that Motion if they remain unpaid. Plaintiffs anticipate they will 

file the Motion with the Court within three weeks, after allowing time for defendants to respond to 

the audit. 

4. There are no further issues to come before the Court. 

5. Plaintiffs therefore respectfully request that the Case Management Conference be 

continued for 60 days, or to the date plaintiffs set for their Motion for Default Judgment, in order 

to conserve costs as well as the Court’s time and resources. 

6. It is furthermore requested that all previously set deadlines and dates related to this 

case be continued as well. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the attorney for the plaintiffs in the above 

entitled action, and that the foregoing is true of my own knowledge. 

 Executed this 25th day of July, 2008, at San Francisco, California. 

 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON 

 LAW CORPORATION 

 By: _____________/s/__________________ 

 Muriel B. Kaplan 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case 

Management Conference is hereby continued to ________________, 2008, or to the date to be set 

for hearing of plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment, and all previously set deadlines and dates 

related to this case are vacated, to be reset at that Conference. 

Date: _________________________ __________________________________ 

 United States District Court Judge 

and the deadline for

plaintiffs to file a motion for default judgment is August 22, 2008.

October 24

July 28, 2008

Case 3:08-cv-00034-MMC Document 22 Filed 07/28/08 Page 2 of 2