Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06585/USCOURTS-ca4-15-06585-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6585

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

ALBERT CHARLES BURGESS, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior 

District Judge. (1:09-cr-00017-GCM-DLH-1; 1:12-cv-00375-GCM) 

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 28, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard 

Ascik, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Asheville, North Carolina; Kimlani M. Ford, Cortney Randall, 

Edward R. Ryan, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, 

North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Appeal: 15-6585 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/28/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion seeking an extension of time to file a 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to 

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

Because Burgess’ informal briefs do not challenge the basis for 

the district court’s disposition, Burgess has forfeited appellate 

review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-6585 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/28/2015 Pg: 2 of 2