Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-262/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-03561 WHA

ORDER RE DEADLINE FOR

MOTION TO DISQUALIFY

RULE 706 EXPERT

The deadline for either side to move to disqualify Dr. Kearl from acting as the Rule 706

expert in this case was initially set for September 10. On September 10, Oracle filed a

statement explaining that it could not assess whether there was a basis for disqualifying Dr.

Kearl due to his expert reports or testimony in Apple v. Samsung, because the reports and

transcripts that were provided were heavily redacted. Counsel for Dr. Kearl has assured the

Court that Dr. Kearl and Oracle could secure a protective order sufficient to allow for the

disclosure of unredacted versions of those documents sometime this week.

The deadline for any party to file a motion to disqualify Dr. Kearl shall be OCTOBER 15. 

It is the parties’ burden to obtain the information necessary to make their respective decisions

by that date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 21, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1322 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 1