Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04379/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04379-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S 

COUNTERCLAIMS THROUGH OCTOBER 19, 2007 AND TO CHANGE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE TO 

FEBRUARY 21, 2008.

CASE NOS. C 04-4379 JF; C 05-5021 JF 

Michael A. Ladra (SBN 064307) 

mladra@wsgr.com 

James C. Yoon (SBN 177155) 

jyoon@wsgr.com 

Julie M. Holloway (SBN 196942) 

jholloway@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: 650-493-9300 

Facsimile: 650-565-5100 

Attorneys for Plaintiff SanDisk Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

SANDISK CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

STMicroelectronics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 

and STMicroelectronics NV, a Dutch company, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: C 04-4379 JF 

Related Case No.: C 05-5021 JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO (1) EXTEND TIME FOR 

PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO 

DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS 

THROUGH OCTOBER 19, 2007 AND 

(2) CHANGE CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE 

TO FEBRUARY 21, 2008 

Pursuant to the provisions of Civil Local Rule 6-1, the parties hereby stipulate to extend 

the Defendant’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s counterclaims from October 1, 2007 through and 

including October 19, 2007. 

The parties further stipulate that the Patent L.R. 4-6 Claim Construction Hearing be held 

on Thursday February 21, 2008, or later, subject to the Court’s availability, so that the hearing will 

be held after claim construction briefing is completed. At the Court’s request, the parties reached 

this stipulation to cure the incongruity in the current schedule, which is detailed in a September 

13, 2007 letter to the Court (see Exhibit A) and summarized below.

**E-filed 10/3/07** ---------------

Case 5:04-cv-04379-JF Document 112 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S 

COUNTERCLAIMS THROUGH OCTOBER 19, 2007 AND TO CHANGE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE TO 

FEBRUARY 21, 2008.

CASE NOS. C 04-4379 JF; C 05-5021 JF 

On September 7, 2007, the Court adopted the schedule for patent local rule events that was 

jointly proposed by all parties but with the dates pushed back 30 days. See Sept. 7, 2007 Civil 

Minute Entry. However, instead of pushing the date for the PLR 4-6 Claim Construction Hearing 

back 30 days, the Court reset the hearing forward by a day, to January 24, 2008. Consequently, 

under the current schedule, the claim construction hearing would be held before the claim 

construction briefing would be completed (on February 11, 2008). The parties thus stipulate that 

the PLR 4-6 Claim Construction Hearing be held on Thursday February 21, 2008, or later, subject 

to the Court’s availability, after the completion of claim construction briefing. 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Michael A. Ladra 

 Dated: September 27, 2007 

 Michael A. Ladra 

Attorneys for Plaintiff SanDisk Corporation 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND 

DORR LLP 

By: /s/ James L. Quarles 

Dated: September 27, 2007 

 James L. Quarles 

Attorneys for Defendants 

STMicroelectronics, Inc. and 

STMicroelectronics N.V. 

Case 5:04-cv-04379-JF Document 112 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S 

COUNTERCLAIMS THROUGH OCTOBER 19, 2007 AND TO CHANGE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE TO 

FEBRUARY 21, 2008.

CASE NOS. C 04-4379 JF; C 05-5021 JF 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The claim construction hearing 

is reset for Thursday, February 21, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. Defendant’s time to file its response to 

Plaintiff’s counterclaims is hereby extended through and including October 19, 2007. 

Dated: ___________________, 2007 

_________________________________ 

 Jeremy Fogel 

 United States District Judge 

------------------ 10/2

Case 5:04-cv-04379-JF Document 112 Filed 10/03/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -4- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S 

COUNTERCLAIMS THROUGH OCTOBER 19, 2007 AND TO CHANGE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE TO 

FEBRUARY 21, 2008.

CASE NOS. C 04-4379 JF; C 05-5021 JF 

CERTIFICATION

 I, Michael A. Ladra, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file the Stipulation and Proposed Order in the above-listed related cases. In compliance with 

General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that counsel for STMicroelectronics, Inc. and 

STMicroelectronics, N.V. has concurred in this filing. 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Michael A. Ladra 

Dated: September 27, 2007 

 Michael A. Ladra 

Attorneys for Plaintiff SanDisk Corporation 

Case 5:04-cv-04379-JF Document 112 Filed 10/03/07 Page 4 of 4