Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00775/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00775-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1396 - Tort Negligence

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HURSEL MITCHELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

SECURITY PACIFIC BANK, et. al.,

Defendant.

No. 1:16-CV-00775-AWI-MJS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED 

FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH A COURT 

ORDER

(Doc. 2)

Plaintiff is a proceeding pro se with a civil complaint in this court.

On June 3, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 

2.) On June 9, 2016, the Court issued an order requesting Plaintiff supplement his in 

forma pauperis application with a declaration providing more information regarding his 

income within ten (10) days of issuance of the order. Over ten days have passed and 

Plaintiff has not responded. 

Local Rule 110 provides: “Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these 

Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any 

and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” 

///

///

Case 1:16-cv-00775-AWI-MJS Document 4 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to, within fourteen (14) days of service of this 

order, SHOW CAUSE why appropriate sanctions should not be imposed for failing to 

comply with a court order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 11, 2016 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00775-AWI-MJS Document 4 Filed 12/12/16 Page 2 of 2