Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01799/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01799-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

CYTOSPORT, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CIV-S-06-1799 DFL EFB

NATURE’S BEST, INC.,

Defendant. 

_________________________________/

Defendant and counterclaimant filed a discovery motion on March 2, 2007, and set the

matter for hearing on March 28, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.. Notwithstanding the three days specified

by E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-251, the joint statement shall be filed in no later than five court days

before the scheduled hearing. The filing deadline, accordingly, will be March 21, 2007.

The dispute may be organized by category, with specific discovery items attached, if

appropriate, as an exhibit. For each disputed category or individual item, include: (1) the

specific disputed discovery category or item; (2) the response; (3) the moving party’s position;

and (4) the opposition. E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-251(c)(3). Do not file separate briefing. Id.

Privilege objections must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5). Except in extraordinary

circumstances, the party claiming privilege may not submit a post-hearing privilege log. The

failure properly to support a privilege objection with a privilege log may be deemed to waive it. 

The moving party is responsible for filing the joint statement. The opposing party

nevertheless must timely draft and submit its portion. Failure of either party to use best efforts to

ensure timely filing will be cause for sanctions. 

Dated: 03/09/2007

___________________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01799-RRB-EFB Document 37 Filed 03/09/07 Page 1 of 1