Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05418/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05418-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR

MANUFACTURING, LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTEGRATED SEMICONDUCTOR 

SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant. 

INTEGRATED SEMICONDUCTOR 

SERVICE, INC.,

Counter-Claimant,

v.

CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR

MANUFACTURING, LTD.,

Counter-Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C04-5418 WHA (BZ)

ORDER DEFERRING DISPOSITION

OF MY ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS

TO STEVEN COLLINS

Following the filing by plaintiff of its motion for

contempt [Docket No. 75], I issued an order sanctioning

defendant and, absent compliance, requiring defendant’s

principle, Mr. Collins, and its attorney, Mr. Goins, to appear

Case 3:04-cv-05418-WHA Document 79 Filed 08/22/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and show cause why contempt proceedings should not be

initiated. Docket No. 77. Mr. Collins, Mr. Goins and counsel

for plaintiff appeared for a show cause hearing on August 21,

2007. Following a brief examination of Mr. Collins, plaintiff

requested that I defer ruling on my order to show cause for

approximately two weeks to allow for plaintiff to perform an

inspection of defendant’s facility and for defendant to

provide certain additional information to plaintiff. 

Defendant voiced its agreement to plaintiff’s proposal. In

light of the parties’ agreement, and good cause appearing, IT

IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1) By August 29, 2007, defendant will provide to

plaintiff for each of its two remaining bank accounts the name

of the institution holding the account, the address of the

institution, the account number(s), and the name(s) on the

account;

2) By September 5, 2007, plaintiff will be allowed to

conduct an inspection of defendant’s place of business for the

purpose of assessing defendant’s inventory;

3) A reasonable time prior to the site inspection,

defendant will submit to plaintiff a description, including

the names and estimated values, of the ten parts or pieces of

equipment in its inventory that defendant thinks are likely to

have the greatest value to plaintiff;

4) By September 7, 2007, the parties will file with the

Court a joint report describing the degree to which defendant

has complied with this Order;

5) I will DEFER ruling on my Order to Show Cause as to

Case 3:04-cv-05418-WHA Document 79 Filed 08/22/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Mr. Collins until after submission of the joint report on

September 7.

Dated: August 21, 2007

Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR\ORD DEFER OSC COLLINS.wpd

Case 3:04-cv-05418-WHA Document 79 Filed 08/22/07 Page 3 of 3