Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01361/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01361-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

J. SCOTT GERIEN, State Bar No. 1 &4728

CHRISTOPHER J. PASSARELLI, State Bar No. 241174

DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY

1455 First Street, Suite 301

Napa, California 94559

Telephone: (707) 252-7122

tmltg@dpf-law.com

JOHN D. MASON (admitted pro hac vice)

COPYRIGHT COUNSELORS, LLC

7315 Wisconsin Ave., Ste. 400 West

Bethesda, MD 20814

Telephone: (888) 313-3637

jmason@copyrightcounselors.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

SMITH-ANDERSON ENTERPRISES, INC.

RACHEAL TURNER (State Bar No. 226441)

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 954-4400

rturner@fbm.com

JEFFREY D. TALBERT (admitted pro hac vice)

STEVEN D. WILSON (admitted pro hac vice)

BENJAMIN S. PIPER (admitted pro hac vice)

PRETI FLAHERTY BELIVEAU & PACHIOS LLP

One City Center, P.O. Box 9546

Portland, ME 04112

jtalbert@preti.com

Attorneys for Defendants

BOSTON EAST TYNGSBORO HOLDINGS LLC, d/b/a

STONEHEDGE INN &SPA; BOSTON EAST INDIA

HOTELS LLC; STONEHEDGE CELLARS LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STIPULATION TO MODIFIED BRIEFING 1

SCHEDULE ON (1) MOTION TO DISMISS

AND (2) MOTION FOR JURISDICTIONAL

DISCOVERY

Case No. 16-CV-01361-EMC

Case 3:16-cv-01361-EMC Document 43 Filed 05/27/16 Page 1 of 4
2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SMITH-ANDERSON ENTERPRISES,

INC,

vs.

Plaintiff,

BOSTON EAST TYNGSBORO

HOLDINGS LLC, d/b/a STONEHEDGE

INN &SPA; BOSTON EAST INDIA

HOTELS LLC; STONEHEDGE

CELLARS LLC; and BENCHMARK

WINE GROUP, INC.

Defendants.

CASE NO. 16-CV-01361-EMC

STIPULATION TO MODIFIED

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON (1)

DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

AND (2) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY

FOR GOOD CAUSE, pursuant to the Hon. Edward M. Chen's instruction that the parties

engage in additional meet-and-confer efforts regarding Plaintiffls Motion to Change Time For

Briefing on (1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF-25) and (2) Plaintiff s Motion for

Jurisdictional Discovery (ECF-32), the parties stipulate to modify the corresponding motion

briefing schedules as follows:

(1) The parties request that the Court vacate the current May 23, 2016 deadline on SmithAnderson's opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss ("Motion to Dismiss") and extend the

briefing schedule; and

(2) The parties request that the Court modify the time for the briefing of the Motion for

Leave to Seek Jurisdictional Discovery ("Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery") of Defendants

Boston East Tyngsboro Holdings LLC, d/b/a Stonehedge Inn &Spa, Boston East India Hotels

LLC and Stonehedge Cellars LLC (hereinafter collectively, "Stonehedge Defendants").

As Smith-Anderson is seeking jurisdictional discovery, the parties ask that the Court

vacate the current due date of May 23, 2016 for Smith-Anderson's opposition brief to the

Stonehedge Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Further, the parties request that the Court set new

deadlines for Smith-Anderson's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss after ruling on

Smith-Anderson's Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery as follows: (1) that if jurisdictional

STIPULATION TO MODIFIED BRIEFING 2 Case No. 16-CV-01361-EMC

SCHEDULE ON (1) MOTION TO DISMISS

AND (2) MOTION FOR JURISDICTIONAL

DISCOVERY

Case 3:16-cv-01361-EMC Document 43 Filed 05/27/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

discovery is granted, Smith-Anderson's opposition brief to the Stonehedge Defendants' Motion to

Dismiss be due 14 days after the completion of jurisdictional discovery; or (2) if jurisdictional

discovery is denied, that Smith-Anderson's opposition brief be due 14 days after the order

denying jurisdictional discovery.

The parties respectfully request that the notice period under the Local Rules be shortened

relative to Plaintiffls Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery, and that the Stonehedge Defendants'

opposition to this Motion be due on Friday, May 27, 2016, and that Smith-Anderson's Reply brief

be due on Friday, June 3, 2016. The parties respectfully request that to the extent the Court would

like hearing on this matter to schedule it for soon thereafter.

Prior to this stipulation, the parties have made the following stipulated requests for time

modifications, all of which have been granted by the Court: (1) extending time for Benchmark

Wine Group, Inc. to respond to the complaint by 10 days after the Court rules on the Stonehedge

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF-29); (2) the Court's own rescheduling the case management

conference and related dates due to the parties' declination to proceed with Magistrate (ECF-14);

and (3) the parties' Stipulated Request to Extend Deadline to Respond to Motion to Dismiss by

seven (7) days (ECF-33).

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: May 23, 2016 DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY

By /s/Christopher J. Passarelli

J. Scott Gerien

Christopher J. Passarelli

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

SMITH-ANDERSON ENTERPRISES, INC.

STIPULATION TO MODIFIED BRIEFING 3

SCHEDULE ON (1) MOTION TO DISMISS

AND (2) MOTION FOR JURISDICTIONAL

DISCOVERY

Case No. 16-CV-01361-EMC

Case 3:16-cv-01361-EMC Document 43 Filed 05/27/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: May 23, 2016 PRETI FLAHERTY BELIVEAU & PACHIOS LLP

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence of the

above noted signatories as indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s~ within this e-filed

document.

Dated: May 23, 2016 By /s/ Christopher J. Passarelli

Christopher J. Passarelli

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

SMITH-ANDERSON ENTERPRISES, INC.

By /s/ Je ffrev D. Talbert

Jeffrey D. Talbert

Steven D. Wilson

Benjamin S. Piper

Attorneys for Defendants,

BOSTON EAST TYNGSBORO

HOLDINGS LLC, d/b/a STONEHEDGE

INN &SPA; BOSTON EAST INDIA

HOTELS LLC; STONEHEDGE CELLARS LLC

fPROPOSEDI ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 2016

HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

STIPULATION TO MODIFIED BRIEFING 4 Case No. 16-CV-01361-EMC

SCHEDULE ON (1) MOTION TO DISMISS

AND (2) MOTION FOR JURISDICTIONAL

DISCOVERY

The hearing on Plaintiff's motion for 

jurisdictional discovery (Docket No. 31) 

shall be held on June 21, 2016, at 1:30 pm May 27

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-01361-EMC Document 43 Filed 05/27/16 Page 4 of 4