Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03998/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03998-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 12:22 Securities Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE ROCKET FUEL INC. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION

Case No. 14-cv-03998-PJH 

ORDER RE: REFILING OF 

DOCUMENTS LODGED UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 210

On January 24, 2017, the court denied all of the parties’ motions for leave to file 

under seal (Dkt. 183, 195, 201), permitting only the redaction of employee names, the 

names of specific third-party clients of Rocket Fuel, and the (partial) sealing of two 

technical documents. Dkt. 210 at 11. The court ordered the parties to refile their briefs 

and supporting papers on the public docket, with appropriate redactions, within 14 days 

of the court’s ruling. Id. at 11–12. Refiling was therefore due by February 7, 2017. On 

that day, lead plaintiffs publicly refiled their papers in accordance with the court’s order. 

Dkt. 213.

Defendants have refiled redacted versions of two of the documents that it 

conditionally filed under seal in their entirety: Exhibits 6 and 7 to the Mitchell Declaration 

(Dkt. 195-1). Dkt. 211, 212. However, defendants have not publicly refiled Exhibits 8, 9, 

and 10 to the Mitchell Declaration, which were also conditionally filed under seal. See

Dkt. 195-10, 195-11, 195-12. Defendants shall publicly refile appropriately redacted 

versions of these documents forthwith, in accordance with the court’s prior order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 9, 2017

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:14-cv-03998-PJH Document 214 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1