Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04929/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04929-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

---

Case No 3:14-cv-4929 SC 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CARLE,MACKIE,

POWER &ROSS LLP

CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP 

JOHN B. DAWSON (SBN 242161) 

jdawson@cmprlaw.com 

RICHARD C. O’HARE (SBN 167960) 

rohare@cmprlaw.com 

100 B Street, Suite 400 

Santa Rosa, California 95401 

Telephone: (707) 526-4200 

Facsimile: (707) 526-4707 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DIANA KARREN and CHARLES KARREN 

LAW OFFICE OF PAUL W. REIDL 

PAUL W. REIDL (SBN 155221) 

paul@reidllaw.com 

241 Eagle Trace Drive 

Half Moon Bay, California 94019 

Telephone: (650) 560-8530 

Attorney for Defendant 

DOMAINE CARNEROS, LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 

DIANA KARREN and CHARLES KARREN,

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

DOMAINE CARNEROS, LTD., 

 Defendant. 

Case No: CASE NO. 3:14-cv-4929 SC

STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE SAMUEL CONTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs Diana 

Karren and Charles Karren and Defendant Domaine Carneros, Ltd., (collectively, the “Parties”), 

as follows: 

A full and final settlement of the above-titled action has been agreed to by all of the 

Parties as set forth in a settlement agreement between them executed on June 25, 2015 (the 

“Agreement”), which Agreement provides in relevant part that “the Parties shall file a stipulation 

Case 3:14-cv-04929-SC Document 26 Filed 07/01/15 Page 1 of 2
Case No 3:14-cv-4929 SC 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CARLE,MACKIE,

POWER &ROSS LLP

and proposed order in [this action] which dismisses [this action] with prejudice upon an order by 

the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Agreement.” 

Pursuant to the Agreement and Rule 41 (a)(2)(A)(ii), the Parties hereby stipulate and 

agree that this action be dismissed with prejudice and that the Court should retain jurisdiction 

over the Parties and the Agreement to enforce the terms thereof. 

The e-signature of Defendant’s counsel has been affixed with his written permission. 

Dated: June 30, 2015 CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP 

 By: /s/ RICHARD C. O’HARE Richard C. O’Hare 

 100 B Street, Suite 400 

 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 

 Telephone: (707) 526-4200 

 Facsimile: (707) 526-4707 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 Diana Karren and Charles Karren 

Dated: June 30, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL W. REIDL 

 By: /s/ PAUL W. REIDL 

 Paul W. Reidl 

 241 Eagle Trace Drive 

 Half Moon Bay, CA 94109 

 Telephone: (650) 560-8530 

paul@reidllaw.com

 Attorney for Defendant 

 Domaine Carneros, Ltd. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Pursuant to the Stipulation between the Parties, the above-titled action shall be dismissed 

with prejudice while the Court reserves and retains jurisdiction of the Agreement and and the 

Parties to enforce the terms thereof. 

Dated: 

 

 THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI 

07/01/2015

Case 3:14-cv-04929-SC Document 26 Filed 07/01/15 Page 2 of 2