Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03961/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03961-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIK DAVID SEGELSTROM, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TFLG, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-03961-JST 

ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING 

DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO 

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE 4(M)

Re: ECF No. 48

The Court previously issued an order to show cause why the remaining Defendants in this 

case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). ECF No. 48. The 

Court observed that, although more than 120 days had passed since the filing of the complaint, the 

remaining Defendants had not yet been served. Id. The Court ordered Plaintiffs to file a written 

response to the order to show cause by May 15, 2015. Id. 

Plaintiffs have not filed any response to the Court’s order.1 The Court will therefore 

dismiss the remaining Defendants without prejudice. The clerk shall close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

 

1 On May 15, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a document titled “Notice of Interlocutory Appeal.” ECF No. 

49. That document concerns the Court’s dismissal of Defendant Nationstar at ECF No. 39 and 

does not reference the unserved Defendants or the Court’s order to show cause at ECF No. 48. 

Case 3:14-cv-03961-JST Document 51 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 1