Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02779/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02779-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TERRANCE ANDERSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. BABCOCK, et al.,

Defendants. 

No. 2:23-cv-2779-TLN-AC 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed December 13, 2023, plaintiff was required to submit an application to 

proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the appropriate filing fee, and was cautioned that failure to do 

so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now 

expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required 

documents. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 

dismissed without prejudice. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 

Case 2:23-cv-02779-TLN-AC Document 6 Filed 01/24/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: January 23, 2024 

 

Case 2:23-cv-02779-TLN-AC Document 6 Filed 01/24/24 Page 2 of 2