Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03236/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03236-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

CASE NO. C-05 03236-CRB

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

MATTHEW L. KABAK, SBN 212505 

LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW L. KABAK 

One Embarcadero Center, 12th Fl. 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 732-3734 

Facsimile: (415) 732-3730 

Email: matt@mattkabak.com 

Attorney for Defendants: 

CONWAYCORPORATION.COM, CONWAYCENTRAL.COM, 

CONWAYCENTRALEXPRESS.COM, AND 

MENLOWORLDWIDEFORWARDING.COM 

ANDREW GRAY IV, SBN 202137 

BRUNO TARABICHI, SBN 215129 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP 

2 Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Ste. 700 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2212 

Telephone: (650) 843-4000 

Facsimile: (650) 843-4001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CNF Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CNF Inc., 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CONWAYCORPORATION.COM, 

CONWAYCENTRAL.COM, 

CONWAYCENTRALEXPRESS.COM, AND 

MENLOWORLDWIDEFORWARDING.COM

 Defendants. 

Case No.: C 05 03236-CRB 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 

HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

TO DISMISS TO OCTOBER 27, 2006; 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Date: April 28, 2006 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Courtroom 8, 19th Fl. 

 

The Honorable Judge Charles R. Breyer 

Case 3:05-cv-03236-CRB Document 24 Filed 03/23/06 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

CASE NO. C-05 03236-CRB

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

 Plaintiff CNF, Inc. and Defendants CONWAYCORPORATION.COM, 

CONWAYCENTRAL.COM, CONWAYCENTRALEXPRESS.COM, and 

MENLOWORLDWIDEFORWARDING.COM, by their attorneys, and pursuant to Civil Local 

Rules 6-1 and 7-7(a), herewith stipulate to continue the hearing on Defendants’ motion to 

dismiss from April 28, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. to October 27, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. In this regard, this 

stipulation continuing the hearing date is being filed prior to the date on which Plaintiff’s 

opposition is due. 

 Good cause exists for this continuance request as the parties have agreed in principle 

to a settlement of the matter and need the additional time to finalize a written agreement, which, 

if completed, will obviate the need for a hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss. 

DATED: March 21, 2006 

LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW L. KABAK 

 

By:___/s/______________________________________ 

Matthew L. Kabak 

 One Embarcadero Center, 12th Fl. 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Tel.: 415-732-3734 

 Fax: 415-732-3730 

 

 Attorney for Defendants: 

CONWAYCORPORATION.COM, 

CONWAYCENTRAL.COM, 

CONWAYCENTRALEXPRESS.COM, AND 

MENLOWORLDWIDEFORWARDING.COM 

DATED: March 21, 2006 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP 

 

By:____/s/_____________________________________ 

 Bruno Tarabichi 

 3000 El Camino Real, Ste. 700 

 Palo Alto, CA 94306-2212 

 Tel.: 650-843-4000 

 Fax : 650-843-4001 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff, CNF Inc. 

Case 3:05-cv-03236-CRB Document 24 Filed 03/23/06 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

CASE NO. C-05 03236-CRB

3

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: March ___, 2006 ________________________________________ 

 HONORABLE JUDGE CHARLES R. BREYER 

22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-03236-CRB Document 24 Filed 03/23/06 Page 3 of 3