Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00442/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00442-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 00:0000 Cause Code Unknown

---

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Page 1 

Stipulation Extending Time To Respond 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MAYALL, HURLEY, KNUTSEN, SMITH & GREEN 

A Professional Corporation 

2453 Grand Canal Boulevard, Second Floor 

Stockton, California 95207-8253 

Telephone (209) 477-3833

JOSEPH A. SALAZAR, JR. 

CA State Bar No. 169551 

MICHAEL L. PHILLIPS 

CA State Bar No. 232978 

Attorneys for Defendants, Cross-Claimants, 

Cross-Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, 

Peden Enterprises, John Peden and Lorena Peden 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC 

SUBSTANCES CONTROL, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITY OF CHICO, a California municipality, 

NORET, INC. a California Corporation; 

GOLDIE OLSON, an individual; PEDEN 

ENTERPRISES, a California Corporation; 

JOHN PEDEN, an individual; SUNSET 

VIEW CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, INC., 

a California corporation; NORVILLE R. 

WEISS, an individual ; and JANET L. 

WEISS, an individual, 

Defendants. 

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. S-02-0442 LKK DAD 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO THE 

SECOND AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM 

OF SUNSET VIEW CEMETERY 

ASSOCIATION, INC. and ORDER 

WHEREAS Cross-Complainant, SUNSET VIEW CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, INC. 

(“Sunset”) served its Second Amended Cross-Claim upon Defendants PEDEN ENTERPRISES, 

JOHN PEDEN, and LORENA PEDEN (“Peden”), on or about October 27, 2005. 

WHEREAS, Sunset and Peden have not previously entered into a stipulation extending 

Peden’s time to respond to the Second Amended Cross-Claim. 

Case 2:02-cv-00442-LKK -DAD Document 335 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Page 2 

Stipulation Extending Time To Respond 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Sunset and Peden have again agreed to an extension of time for Peden to 

respond to the Second Amended Cross-Claim to and including December 12, 2005. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, pursuant to 

Rule 6-144(a) of the Civil Local Rules of this Court, that the time for Peden to file and serve its 

response to the Second Amended Cross-Claim is extended to and including December 12, 2005. 

SO STIPULATED: 

DATED: November 17, 2005 FITZGERALD ABBOTT & BEARDSLEY LLP

s/J. Brittain Habegger .

J. Brittain Habegger 

Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Complainant, and 

Cross-Defendant Sunset View Cemetery Association 

DATED: November 17, 2005 MAYALL, HURLEY, KNUTSEN, SMITH & 

GREEN

s/Joseph A. Salazar, Jr. .

Joseph A. Salazar, Jr. 

Attorneys for Defendants, Cross-Claimants, 

Cross-Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, 

Peden Enterprises, John Peden and Lorena Peden 

ORDER 

Based on the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause existing therefore, Peden shall file its 

responsive pleading to Sunset’s Second Amended Cross-Claim on or before December 12, 2005. 

DATED:_November 29, 2005 /s/Lawrence K. Karlton

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:02-cv-00442-LKK -DAD Document 335 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2