Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01304/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01304-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VAHN JALADIAN, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1304 LKK CMK P

vs.

C.A. HUGHES, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 9, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01304-LKK -CMK Document 47 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 9, 2006 are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 32) is granted in part and

denied in part;

a. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment regarding plaintiff’s claim

that defendant Cribbs violated his Eighth Amendment rights on July 15, 2003 is denied;

b. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment regarding plaintiff’s claim

that defendants Hughes, Rodriguez, Butler, Chandler, Grannis and Brown violated his Eighth

Amendment rights on July 15, 2003 is granted;

c. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim that

defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights on November 23, 2003 is granted;

d. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s retaliation

claim is granted; and

e. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s discrimination

claim under Title VII of the ADA is granted.

DATED: September 11, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-01304-LKK -CMK Document 47 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 2