Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_19-cv-08414/USCOURTS-cand-5_19-cv-08414-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAMELA ACOSTA,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNKNOWN,

 Defendant.

Case No. 19-08414 EJD (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On December 26, 2019, Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a letter 

which the Court construed as a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On the 

same day, the Clerk sent Plaintiff separate notices that the In Forma Pauperis Application 

(“IFP”) and complaint were deficient, and she needed to submit a Complaint, IFP 

Application and Consent to Magistrate Judge within twenty-eight days or face dismissal of 

the action. (Docket Nos. 2, 3 and 4.) On January 6, 2020, the notices sent to Plaintiff were

returned to the Court as undeliverable because Plaintiff was no longer in custody. (Docket 

No. 5.) To date, Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a new address and has had no 

further communication with the Court.1

1 On January 14, 2020, the Court sua sponte attempted to contact Plaintiff at a different 

address that was discovered, but there has been no response from Plaintiff to that mailin

Case 5:19-cv-08414-EJD Document 9 Filed 03/11/20 Page 1 of 2
Order of Dismissal

PRO-SE\EJD\CR.19\8414.Acosta_dis-LR3

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11, a party proceeding pro se must 

promptly file a notice of change of address while an action is pending. See L.R. 3-11(a). 

The Court may, without prejudice, dismiss a complaint when: (1) mail directed to the pro 

se party by the Court has been returned to the Court as not deliverable, and (2) the Court 

fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written communication from the pro se

party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b). 

More than sixty days have passed since the mail addressed to Plaintiff was returned 

as undeliverable. The Court has not received a notice from Plaintiff regarding a new 

address. Accordingly, the instant civil rights action is DISMISSED without prejudice 

pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the Northern District Local Rules. 

The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________________ ________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

3/11/2020

Case 5:19-cv-08414-EJD Document 9 Filed 03/11/20 Page 2 of 2