Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06434/USCOURTS-ca4-08-06434-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6434

RICKY D. SANDERS, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF SUMTER, care of William T. Noonan; COUNTY OF LEE,

care of Jimmy Lacoste; DOCTOR WHITAKER, SLRDC Physician;

SOUTHEASTERN SERVICE GROUP, INCORPORATED, care of Annette

Stalvy; SIMON MAJOR, Director of SLRDC; LIEUTENANT NANCY

MCMILLIN, Shift Head Supervisor; C.O. BRUNSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(0:06-cv-01670-MBS)

Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 19, 2008

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON. Senior

Circuit Judges.

Ricky Darren Sanders, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr.,

DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; John

Evans James, III, JOHN E. JAMES II LAW OFFICE, Winnsboro, South

Carolina; Lucy Grey Wilson McIver, LEE, ERTER, WILSON, JAMES,

HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina; Kathleen Devereaux

Cauthen, CAUTHEN LAW FIRM, Blythewood, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Appeal: 08-6434 Doc: 24 Filed: 08/19/2008 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 08-6434 Doc: 24 Filed: 08/19/2008 Pg: 2 of 3
*

Because Sanders specifically objected to only one aspect of

the report of the magistrate judge after proper notice of the need

to file specific objections, only that issue is preserved for our

review. See United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th

Cir. 2007)

- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Darren Sanders, Sr., appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v.

County of Sumter, No. 0:06-cv-01670-MBS (D.S.C. filed Mar. 4, 2008

& entered Mar. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 08-6434 Doc: 24 Filed: 08/19/2008 Pg: 3 of 3