Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05256/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05256-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 06-7636 JF (HRL)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

JFLC2

**E-Filed 11/16/07**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

BIN YU,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the

Department of Homeland Security; ROBERT S.

MUELLER, 

Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation, 

 Defendants.

Case Number C 07-5256 JF 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On October 15, 2007, Plaintiff Bin Yu (“Yu”) filed the instant “Complaint For Writ in the

Nature of Mandamus.” Plaintiff alleges that Defendants have failed to process his I-485

application in a timely manner. 

Yu is a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China. Complaint ¶ 2. Yu is

married to Di Zhang (“Zhang”), a United States citizen. Id. On May 1, 2005, Yu filed a Form I485 with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) seeking to become a

lawful permanent resident of the United States as a beneficiary of the Form I-130 petition filed

Case 5:07-cv-05256-JF Document 4 Filed 11/19/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 07-5256 JF

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

JFEX2

by Zhang. Id. Yu’s application is still pending with the USCIS. Id. ¶ 9. 

Yu alleges that, as a result, Defendants have violated the Administrative Procedures Act,

5 U.S.C § 701 et. seq. Yu requests that this Court enter an order compelling defendants to act

upon his application. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of the complaint and a copy of this

Order upon counsel for Defendants, the Office of the United States Attorney. The

Clerk of the Court also shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff.

(2) Defendants shall, within sixty (60) days after receiving service of the complaint,

show cause in writing why the relief prayed for should not be granted. 

(3) Plaintiff may file a response to Defendants’ filing within twenty (20) days after

receipt of such filing. 

(4) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the matter will be deemed submitted upon

the filing of the response or upon the expiration of time to file a response.

(5) The order dated October 15, 2007, setting an Initial Case Management Conference

and ADR deadlines, is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 11/13/07

__________________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:07-cv-05256-JF Document 4 Filed 11/19/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case No. C 07-5256 JF

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

JFEX2

Copies of Order served on the following persons:

Plaintiff:

Justin X. Wang justin@lawbw.com 

Counsel for Defendants:

Office of the United States Attorney

150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900

San Jose, CA 95113

Case 5:07-cv-05256-JF Document 4 Filed 11/19/07 Page 3 of 3