Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02430/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02430-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

-1- 

1 BOUTIN DENTINO GIBSON 

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DI GIUSTO HODELL INC. 

Michael E. Chase, Esq. SBN 214506 

Daniel S. Stouder, Esq. SBN 226753 

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500 

Sacramento, CA 95814-4603 

(916) 321-4444 

Attorneys for Defendant, ARS Hospitality, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SCOTT N. JOHNSON 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ARS HOSPITALITY, INC., individually and 

dba HAMPTON INN & SUITES, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 2:06-CV-02430-GEB-GGH

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Date Action Filed: 

The parties stipulate, through their counsel of record, as follows: 

 1. Defendant, ARS Hospitality, Inc., has been granted one previous extension of time to 

respond to Plaintiff’s complaint, through and including, February 8, 2007. 

 2. The parties are negotiating settlement of the entire action, and believe a mutually 

acceptable settlement will be reached shortly. 

 3. Extending Defendant, ARS Hospitality, Inc.’s time to respond for a period of thirty 

(30) days, through and including March 9, 2007, should allow the parties sufficient time to reach a 

settlement of all issues in this case. 

 4. Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, and Defendant, ARS Hospitality, Inc., therefore stipulate 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

112847.1 

Case 2:06-cv-02430-GEB-GGH Document 9 Filed 02/12/07 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

that Defendant be granted an extension of an additional 30 (thirty) days within which to respond to 

Plaintiff’s complaint, through and including March 9, 2007. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February 8, 2007 ___/s/ Scott N. Johnson_________________________

 Scott N. Johnson, Plaintiff in Pro Per 

 BOUTIN DENTINO GIBSON DI GIUSTO HODELL INC. 

Dated: February 8, 2007 By: __ /s/ Daniel S. Stouder___________________

 Daniel S. Stouder, Attorneys for Defendant, 

 ARS Hospitality, Inc. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

112847.1 

Case 2:06-cv-02430-GEB-GGH Document 9 Filed 02/12/07 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Having read and considered the parties’ above stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant, ARS Hospitality, Inc., be granted a thirty (30) 

day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint, through and including March 9, 2007. 

Dated: _February 9, 2007_

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

112847.1 

Case 2:06-cv-02430-GEB-GGH Document 9 Filed 02/12/07 Page 3 of 3