Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05420/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05420-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1 XAVIER BECERRA

Attorney General of California 

2 JOHN SAURENMAN 

Senior Assistant Attorney General 

3 DAVID G. ALDERSON 

Acting Supervising Deputy Attorney General 

4 TARA L. MUELLER 

Deputy Attorney General 

5 State Bar No. 161536 

1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor 

6 P.O. Box 70550 

Oakland, CA 94612-0550 

7 Telephone: (510) 879-0754 

Fax: (510) 622-2270 

8 E-mail: Tara.Mueller@doj.ca.gov 

Attorneys for Plaintiff San Francisco Bay

9 Conservation & Development Commission

10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13 

14

SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND

15 DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION,

16 Plaintiff, 

17 and 

18 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, 

19 Plaintiff-Intervenor, 

20 v.

21

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS;

22 LIEUTENANT GENERAL TODD T. SEMONITE,

IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; LIEUTENANT

23 COLONEL JOHN C. MORROW, IN HIS OFFICIAL

CAPACITY; AND DOUGLAS J. LAMONT, 24 ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR

CIVIL WORKS, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY, 25 

Defendants. 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 3:16-CV-05420-RS 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

STATEMENT AND ORDER

Date: May 25, 2017 

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Location: Courtroom 3, 17th Floor 

Action Filed: September 22, 2016 

1

Stipulation to Continue CMC and [Proposed] Order (Case No. C 3:16-CV-95420-RS) 

Case 3:16-cv-05420-RS Document 45 Filed 05/18/17 Page 1 of 4
1 Plaintiff San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (“Commission”), 

2 Plaintiff-Intervenor San Francisco Baykeeper (“Baykeeper”), and Defendants United States Army 

3 Corps of Engineers, Lieutenant General Todd T. Semonite, Lieutenant Colonel John C. Morrow, 

4 and Douglas J. LaMont (hereafter “Federal Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, 

5 hereby submit the following stipulation to continue the case management conference: 

6 WHEREAS, this Court granted the motion to intervene of San Francisco Baykeeper as a

7 plaintiff-intervenor on April 25, 2017; 

8 WHEREAS, Federal Defendants circulated to the Commission, who in turn circulated to 

9 Baykeeper, a draft index to the administrative record on April 28, 2017; 

10 WHEREAS, on May 15, 2017, the Commission and Baykeeper sent to Federal Defendants 

11 a detailed list of general and specific questions concerning the scope and content of the draft 

12 index to the administrative record; 

13 WHEREAS, the Commission has informed the parties that it intends to move to file a 

14 supplemental complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 15(d), and Federal 

15 Defendants have agreed to consider stipulating to allow the Commission to file a supplemental 

16 complaint, which will affect the scope and content of the administrative record; 

17 WHEREAS, the parties have begun the process of discussing the scope and content of the 

18 administrative record, the Commission’s proposed filing of a supplemental complaint and other 

19 matters and have scheduled a further, more substantive discussion on the administrative record on 

20 June 5, 2017; 

21 WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the parties have collectively determined that the best 

22 course of action at this stage is to stipulate to continue the case management conference for 

23 several weeks to allow the parties sufficient time to determine whether they will be able to reach 

24 an agreement on the scope and content of the administrative record, or whether plaintiff and 

25 plaintiff-intervenor will need to file a motion to supplement the administrative record, and for 

26 Federal Defendants to determine whether they will agree to stipulate to the filing of the 

27 Commission’s supplemental complaint or whether the Commission will need to file a motion to 

28 supplement the complaint.

2

Stipulation to Continue CMC and [Proposed] Order (Case No. C 3:16-CV-95420-RS) 

Case 3:16-cv-05420-RS Document 45 Filed 05/18/17 Page 2 of 4
1 NOW THEREFORE, IN LIGHT OF THE FOREGOING RECITALS, THE

2 PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

3 That the case management conference currently scheduled for May 25, 2017 at 10:00 am in 

4 this Court be continued to June 29, 2017 at 10:00 am, or such other later date as may be 

5 convenient for the Court, to allow the parties to continue to meet and confer regarding the scope 

6 and content of the administrative record, the filing of a supplemental complaint and other issues 

7 concerning this litigation, to ensure that the further case management conference is maximally 

8 productive with respect to the issues to be decided at this stage of the litigation. 

9 

10 Dated: May 18, 2017

Respectfully submitted, 11

XAVIER BECCERA

12 Attorney General of California 

13 

14 /s/ Tara L. Mueller

TARA L. MUELLER

15 Deputy Attorney General 

Attorneys for Plaintiff San Francisco Bay 16 Conservation & Development Commission

17 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER 

18 

/s/ Erica A. Maharg 19 ERICA A. MAHARG 

Managing Attorney 20 Attorneys for Plaintiff- Intervenor San

Francisco Baykeeper 21

22 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

23 

24 /s/ David B. Glazer

DAVID B. GLAZER

25 Attorneys for Defendants United States Army

Corps of Engineers, Todd T. Semonite, John 26 C. Morrow, and Douglas J. LaMont

27 

28 

3

Stipulation to Continue CMC and [Proposed] Order (Case No. C 3:16-CV-95420-RS) 

Case 3:16-cv-05420-RS Document 45 Filed 05/18/17 Page 3 of 4
1 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

2 Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, the case management conference is 

3 hereby continued to June 29, 2017 at 10:00 am in Courtroom 3. The parties’ joint case 

4 management statement is due on or before June 22, 2017. 

5 

6 IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 

Dated: May 18, 2017 8 Hon. Richard G. Seeborg

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4

Stipulation to Continue CMC and [Proposed] Order (Case No. C 3:16-CV-95420-RS) 

Case 3:16-cv-05420-RS Document 45 Filed 05/18/17 Page 4 of 4