Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00109/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00109-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

BRADY K. McGUINNESS (SBN: 172548)

COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

Attorneys at Law

499 West Shaw, Suite 116

Fresno, California 93704

Telephone: (559) 248-4820

Facsimile: (559) 248-4830

Attorneys for Defendant ERNEST APPLE,

dba L & L HAWAIIAN BBQ

TANYA E. MOORE #206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, CA 95112

Telephone: (408) 298-2000

Facsimile: (408) 298-6046

Attorney for Plaintiff, ARTHUR OWENS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTHUR OWENS,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRIXMOR ARBOR FAIR OWNER, LP; 

ERNEST APPLE dba L & L HAWAIIAN 

BBQ; HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC, dba 

HOME DEPOT #663,

Defendant(s).

NO. 1:16-CV-00109 -- EPG

SECOND STIPULATION AND 

ORDER TO EXTEND FILING DATE 

FOR RESPONSE TO THE 

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

(EASTERN DISTRICT) LOCAL 

RULES, RULE 144

Complaint Served: February 13, 2016

New Response Date: April 18, 2016

Plaintiff Arthur Owens (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Ernest Apple dba L & L Hawaiian 

BBQ (“Defendant”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate to a second 

extension of time such that Defendant shall have until April 18, 2016 to respond to the 

Complaint.

Good cause exists for this extension so that the parties may continue to evaluate the 

alleged access barriers set forth in Plaintiff’s Complaint and to discuss the possibility of an 

Case 1:16-cv-00109-DAD-EPG Document 22 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

informal resolution of this dispute without the time and expense of further litigation. In 

particular, permitting this extension of time to respond to the Complaint will allow Defendant to 

avoid the cost of preparing and filing a formal response to the Complaint if the parties are able to 

settle this Action prior to April 18, 2016. This is Defendant’s second request for an extension. 

This extension will not alter any dates or deadlines already set by Court order, including the 

mandatory scheduling conference set for April 26, 2016 and the joint scheduling report due on 

April 19, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 1, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

By /s/ Tanya E. Moore 

Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff, Arthur Owens

Dated: April 1, 2016 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP 

By /s/ Brady K. McGuinness 

Brady K. McGuinness

Attorney for Defendant, Ernest Apple 

dba L & L Hawaiian BBQ

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 1, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00109-DAD-EPG Document 22 Filed 04/01/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation, and good cause appearing therein, the deadline for 

Defendant Ernest Apple dba L&L Hawaiian BBQ to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is 

continued by two weeks to April 18, 2016.

Case 1:16-cv-00109-DAD-EPG Document 22 Filed 04/01/16 Page 3 of 3