Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02090/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02090-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD E. CAVNESS-BEY,

Petitioner,

v.

RONALD DAVIS,

Respondent.

No. 2:15-cv-2090 WBS KJN P

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed October 19, 2015, petitioner’s habeas application was dismissed and thirty 

days leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, 

and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order.

On November 9, 2015, petitioner filed a notice of interlocutory appeal, and a motion for 

certificate of appealability, both concerning the October 19, 2015 order. However, on February 

23, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed petitioner’s appeal. 

Thus, petitioner’s motion for certificate of appealability is moot.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for certificate of 

appealability (ECF No. 12) is denied as moot; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 

110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

////

Case 2:15-cv-02090-WBS-KJN Document 17 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” If petitioner files objections, 

he shall also address whether a certificate of appealability should issue and, if so, why and as to 

which issues. A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 “only if the 

applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(3). Any response to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after 

service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: April 7, 2016

cavn2090.fta.hab

Case 2:15-cv-02090-WBS-KJN Document 17 Filed 04/07/16 Page 2 of 2