Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02212/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02212-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO STAY ACTION PENDING EXECUTION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

Peter H. Kang (SBN 158101) <pkang@sidley.com> 

Hae-Won Min Liao (SBN 234105) <hminliao@sidley.com> 

Kevin P. Burke (SBN 241972) <kburke@sidley.com> 

Duy D. Nguyen (SBN 246271) <ddnguyen@sidley.com> 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Attorneys For Plaintiff 

Romirico Remeidio 

EDMUND G. BROWN JR. 

Attorney General of the State of California 

DAVID S. CHANEY 

Chief Assistant Attorney General 

FRANCES T. GRUNDER 

Senior Assistant Attorney General 

THOMAS S. PATTERSON 

Supervising Deputy Attorney General 

JAY C. RUSSELL (SBN 122626) <jay.russell@doj.ca.gov> 

Deputy Attorney General 

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 

San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 

Telephone: (415) 703-5717 

Facsimile: (415) 703-5843 

Attorneys for Defendants J. Woodford, I. Nienhuis, 

D. Wooten, D. Dacanay, and A. Kane 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ROMIRICO REMEIDIO, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

J. WOODFORD, et. al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 

Case No. C 03-2212 SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

STAYING ACTION PENDING 

EXECUTION OF SETTLEMENT 

AGREEMENT 

Case 3:03-cv-02212 Document 63 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-02212-SI Document 65 Filed 03/07/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 2 

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO STAY ACTION PENDING EXECUTION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

Plaintiff Romirico Remeidio and Defendants J. Woodford, I. Nienhuis, D. Wooten, D. 

Dacanay, and A. Kane, through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, the parties hereby notify the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of the 

above-captioned action in its entirety and are in the process of finalizing their written settlement 

agreement; 

WHEREAS, at the Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge LaPorte on March 1, 

2007, the parties put the essential terms of the settlement on the record and intend the settlement 

reached on that day to be a binding settlement agreement; 

WHEREAS, the parties intend to prepare and execute a formal settlement agreement and 

submit a Request For Dismissal to the Court as soon as reasonably possible; 

WHEREAS, the non-expert discovery deadline for this action is March 30, 2007; 

WHEREAS, in order to allow the parties to devote their efforts to finalizing the settlement 

agreement in this matter rather than to litigation activities, the parties agree that a stay of the action 

is warranted; 

THEREFORE, it is hereby STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, by and through 

their respective counsel of record, as follows: 

1. The action be stayed in its entirety after the entry of this Stipulation and [Proposed] 

Order; 

2. All trial and pre-trial deadlines be taken off-calendar accordingly; 

3. In the event that the action is not formally settled and dismissed within 120 days after 

the entry of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order, the stay shall expire and the parties shall request 

that the Court schedule a status conference on a date that is mutually convenient to the parties to 

report the status of finalizing the settlement agreement; and 

4. That nothing in this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order shall prohibit either party from 

seeking relief from the Court at any time to enforce the settlement agreement placed on the record. 

Case 3:03-cv-02212 Document 63 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-02212-SI Document 65 Filed 03/07/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 3 

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO STAY ACTION PENDING EXECUTION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD: 

Respectfully submitted, 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

By: /s/Duy D. Nguyen 

Dated: March 5, 2007 

Peter H. Kang 

Hae-Won Min Liao 

Kevin Burke 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Romirico Remeidio 

Dated: March 5, 2007 STATE OF CALIFORNIA

By: /s/Jay C. Russell 

Edmund G. Brown Jr. 

David S. Chaney 

Frances T. Grunder 

Thomas S. Patterson 

Attorneys for Defendants 

J. Woodford, I. Nienhuis, D. Wooten, D. 

Dacanay, and A. Kane 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________________ ________________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:03-cv-02212 Document 63 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-02212-SI Document 65 Filed 03/07/07 Page 3 of 3