Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-08160/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-08160-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 362
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Angela Hilgedick, surviving spouse of

L.D. Steven Gladestone, on her own

behalf and on behalf of Doreen Gladstone,

surviving mother of L.D. Steven

Gladstone, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

United States of America; Sue Collins,

P.C., an Arizona corporation; Walgreens

Oshkosh, Inc., a foreign corporation;

Walgreens National Corporation, a foreign

corporation, d/b/a Walgreens; Walgreen

Arizona Drug Co., a foreign corporation;

Walgreens Health Initiatives, Inc., a

foreign corporation, d/b/a Walgreens

Health Initiatives; WHP Health Initiatives,

Inc., an Illinois corporation; Walgreen

Pharmacy Services Western, L.L.C., a

foreign corporation; Walgreen Co., a

foreign corporation;

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-8160-PHX-LOA

ORDER

Plaintiffs’ counsel having failed to comply with two prior court orders, docket

## 16, 22, and violated LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) (use of improper capitalization of party names),

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant United States of

America’s Motion to Dismiss and Remand and Motion to Vacate Entry of Default, docket

## 23-24, are hereby STRICKEN from the record without prejudice. Plaintiffs may,

Case 2:08-cv-08160-LOA Document 27 Filed 01/15/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

however, refile these documents no later than Tuesday, January 20, 2009 without

substantive changes in full compliance with prior court orders. Failure to timely refile these

documents, which shall comply in all aspects with the Local Rules and prior court orders,

may result in the Court’s ruling on the pending Motions without consideration of Plaintiffs’

amended Responses.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for the United States’ optional

Reply shall not begin to run until Plaintiffs’ amended Responses are filed.

Chamber’s staff shall fax a copy of this signed order to Plaintiffs’ counsel in

the event she does not read her electronically-delivered orders.

DATED this 15th day of January, 2009.

1/15/09: faxed copy to 

Alicia Funkhouser by vlg

Case 2:08-cv-08160-LOA Document 27 Filed 01/15/09 Page 2 of 2