Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04101/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04101-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MEDEANALYTICS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-04101-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

Good cause having been shown, both parties may file early cross motions for summary 

judgment regarding the existence of a duty to defend, which motions will not count against the 

limit of one motion for summary judgment per party in the Court’s standing order for civil cases.

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings December 17, 2015

Fact discovery cut-off August 26, 2016

Expert disclosures September 16, 2016

Expert rebuttal October 7, 2016

Expert discovery cut-off October 21, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions November 11, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due January 24, 2017

Case 3:15-cv-04101-JST Document 19 Filed 12/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Pretrial conference February 3, 2017 at 

2:00 p.m. in Oakland

Trial February 27, 2017 at 

8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) 4 to 6 days

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2015

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-04101-JST Document 19 Filed 12/16/15 Page 2 of 2