Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00163/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00163-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, CASE NO. CV-F-09-2234 LJO DLB

REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA CORN

AND SOYBEAN GROWERS, PENNY 

NEWMAN GRAIN, INC., GROWTH ENERGY, ORDER ON OREGON’S AMICUS

RENEWABLE FUELS ASSOCIATION, REX CURIAE REQUEST (Doc. 28)

NEDEREND, FRESNO COUNTY FARM

BUREAU, NISEI FARMERS LEAGUE, and

CALIFORNIA DAIRY CAMPAIGN,

Plaintiffs, 

 

vs.

JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, Executive Officer

of the California Air Resources Board,

Defendants.

 

NATIONAL PETROCHEMICAL & CASE NO. CV-F-10-163 LJO DLB

REFINERS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN

TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, CENTER ORDER ON OREGON’S AMICUS

FOR NORTH AMERICAN ENERGY CURIAE REQUEST (Doc. 30)

SECURITY, and THE CONSUMER

ENERGY ALLIANCE,

Plaintiffs, 

 

vs.

JAMES GOLDSTENE, Executive Officer

of the California Air Resources Board, 

MARY D. NICHOLS, DANIEL SPERLING,

KEN YEAGER, DORENE D’ADAMO, 

BARBARA RIORDAN, JOHN R. BALMES,

LYDIA H. KENNARD, SANDRA BERG,

RON ROBERTS, RONALD O. 

LOVERIDGE, member of the California 

Air Resources Board; ARNOLD 

SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the

state of Caliofrnia, and EDMUND BROWN,

Attorney General of the state of California,

Defendants.

 /

and related intervenor actions

 /

1

Case 1:10-cv-00163-LJO-DLB Document 47 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On April 27, 2010, the State of Oregon (“Oregon”) moved to appear as an amicus curiae in the

above-titled actions. Because the pending motions to dismiss in the actions are set to be heard on May

26, 2010, this Court set an expedited briefing schedule on Oregon’s motions to appear as an amicus

curiae. On May 6, 2010, all parties, including plaintiffs, defendants, and intervenor defendants, filed

statements of non-opposition to Oregon’s motions. For good cause appearing, this Court GRANTS

Oregon’s unopposed motions. Oregon may file its amicus brief for this Court’s consideration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 7, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00163-LJO-DLB Document 47 Filed 05/07/10 Page 2 of 2