Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01629/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01629-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION TO EXCEED PAGE 

LIMITS FOR MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT 

OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

2:12-cv-01629-MCE-AC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Gibbons & Conley

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1333 N. California Blvd

Suite 110

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

(925) 932-3600

Fax (925) 932-1623

A. BYRNE CONLEY, ESQ. SBN 112715

SEAN C. CONLEY, ESQ. SBN 130814

GIBBONS & CONLEY

2185 North California Boulevard, Suite 285

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Telephone: (925) 932-3600 Fax: (925) 932-1623

Attorneys for Defendants BARRY BOERSMA, HERMAN 

ROBINSON, JOHN CUNNINGHAM, MIKE KOUTNIK, 

RAUL MUNOZ, and ROBERT NICHELINI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

V.W., a minor, by and through her Guardian 

Ad Litem, Tanaya Barber, Individually and 

as Successor in Interest of Decedent 

MICHAEL WHITE, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

ROBERT NICHELINI, et al.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

)

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-01629-MCE-AC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

APPLICATION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS 

FOR MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 

AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case 2:12-cv-01629-MCE-AC Document 63 Filed 03/22/16 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ APPLICATION TO EXCEED PAGE 

LIMITS FOR MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT 

OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

2:12-cv-01629-MCE-AC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Gibbons & Conley

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1333 N. California Blvd

Suite 110

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

(925) 932-3600

Fax (925) 932-1623

Proof of good cause having been made to the satisfaction of this Court that the application

sought for Defendants to exceed the page limits for a memorandum of points and authorities in

support of their Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

should be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED that the application be, and hereby is, GRANTED, and Defendants 

may file a memorandum of points and authorities of up to 30 pages. Plaintiff’s opposition may also 

be up to 30 pages any length, with a reply, if any, limited to 15 pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 21, 2016

Case 2:12-cv-01629-MCE-AC Document 63 Filed 03/22/16 Page 2 of 2