Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02222/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02222-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint

case management statement filed in connection with a case management conference. 

Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case

management conference has not been scheduled.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY A. BYNUM,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Defendant. /

No. C 15-02222 JSW

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

TO ADVISE COURT WHETHER

HE CONSENTS TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL

PURPOSES

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to

reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final

judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). Defendant has filed a notice of consent. (Docket No. 8.) 

The Court HEREBY DIRECTS Plaintiff to advise the Court, by no later than June 26, 2015,

whether he is willing to consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in

the instant action.1

 For the Plaintiff’s convenience, consent forms are available at

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section. The parties are further advised that they

may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 29, 2015 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:15-cv-02222-JSW Document 9 Filed 06/01/15 Page 1 of 1