Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-02582/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-02582-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2037802.1 1

WILLIAM B. LOOK, JR. (SPACE BELOW FOR COURT USE ONLY)

Attorney at Law

PO BOX 1381

Monterey, CA 93942

831-372-1371/372-5779 FAX

email: look_mtr@sbcglobal.net

#66631

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Jonathan M. Cabral, Esther L.

Matthews,

Plaintiffs,

v.

California Reconveyance Companty,

Washington Mutual Bank FA, JPMorgan

Chase Bank NA, And All Persons

Unknown Claiming Any Legal Or

Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien Or

Interest In The Property Described In

The Complaint Adverse To Plaintiffs’

Title, Or Any Cloud Upon Plaintiffs’

Title Thereto, Does 1-100,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE: 5:09-cv-02582-PVT

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

ADR COMPLETION DATE AND

ORDER THEREON

Plaintiffs and defendants stipulate as follows:

1. This case has been referred to ADR (mediation), and the present ADR completion date

is March 31, 2010.

2. Following an ADR telephone conference with the appointed mediator, Peter W.

JW (PVT) 

Case 5:09-cv-02582-JW Document 29 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2037802.1 2

Sherwood, on March 24, 2010, the parties scheduled a mediation, which is to occur on May

6, 2010.

3. Whereas the parties desire to attempt resolution prior to engaging in further litigation,

and whereas they further desire sufficient time to complete ADR, they hereby stipulate to

extend the completion date for ADR to and including May 7, 2010. Defendant JPMorgan is

presently reviewing and considering Plaintiffs’ application for a loan modification. The

additional time, if granted, would allow further consideration of Plaintiffs’ application and

narrowing of issues that may be considered during the ADR process, if the parties do not

resolve the matter prior to the mediation.

So stipulated:

DATE: March 24, 2010 __//ss//________________________________

William B. Look, Jr., Attorney for Plaintiffs

DATE: March 24, 2010 __//ss//______________________________

Patricio A. Marquez, for Adorno Yoss Alvarado &

Smith, Attorneys for Defendants

Case 5:09-cv-02582-JW Document 29 Filed 04/09/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2037802.1 3

ORDER

Good cause appearing,

The foregoing stipulation is approved and the mediation completion date extended

to__________________ .

DATED: ____________ , 2010 ___________________________________

United States District Judge

Cabral v. California Reconveyance 5:09-cv-02582

May 7, 2010 April 9, 

Case 5:09-cv-02582-JW Document 29 Filed 04/09/10 Page 3 of 3