Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-00789/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-00789-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 4:19-cv-0789 HSG

CHARLES C. KELLY, II—SBN 122253

MONTANA BAKER—SBN 319491

HERSH & HERSH

A Professional Corporation

601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2080

San Francisco, CA 94102-6396

Telephone: (415) 441-5544

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ANDREA JONES and A.H., a minor

BARBARA J. PARKER, City Attorney – SBN 069722

MARIA BEE, Chief Assistant City Attorney – SBN 167716

DAVID A. PEREDA, Special Counsel – SBN 237982

MICHELLE M. MEYERS, Supervising Deputy City Attorney – SBN 236387

One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 238-2964, Fax: (510) 238-6500

Email: mmeyers@oaklandcityattorney.org

X04671/2745229

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF OAKLAND, OAKLAND 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, and HAROLD CASTRO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

ANDREA JONES, an individual and A.H.,

a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem 

Andrea Jones,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal corporation; 

OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, a 

municipal corporation; HAROLD CASTRO, 

individually, and in his capacity as law 

enforcement officer for OAKLAND POLICE 

DEPARTMENT; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 

individually and in their capacities as law 

enforcement officers and/or personnel for 

OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:19-cv-0789 HSG

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case 4:19-cv-00789-HSG Document 25 Filed 05/03/19 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 2 4:19-cv-0789 HSG

TO ALL PARTIES AND THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED COURT:

The parties respectfully request that the Initial Case Management Conference currently 

scheduled for May 21, 2019 be continued to a date on or after August 8, 2019, the date the Court is 

scheduled to hear the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Good cause exists as the pleadings remain 

unsettled and Plaintiffs may seek to add additional defendants following the hearing on the 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 

The parties further stipulate that all dates, i.e. Case Management Statements, Initial 

Disclosures, Joint Rule 26 Report, etc. corresponding to the Initial Case Management Conference as 

currently scheduled likewise be continued to correspond to the new Case Management Conference 

date. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: May 2, 2019 HERSH & HERSH

By: ___/s/ Montana Baker__________________________

CHARLES C. KELLY, II

MONTANA BAKER

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ANDREA JONES and A.H., a minor

Dated: May 2, 2019

BARBARA J. PARKER, City Attorney

MARIA BEE., Chief Assistant City Attorney

DAVID A. PEREDA, Special Counsel

MICHELLE M. MEYERS, Supervising Deputy City Attorney

By:____/s/ Michelle Meyers_______________________________

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF OAKLAND, OAKLAND POLICE 

DEPAR TMENT, HAROLD CASTRO 

Case 4:19-cv-00789-HSG Document 25 Filed 05/03/19 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 3 4:19-cv-0789 HSG

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, the Initial Case Management Conference 

is continued to ____________. 

DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________ Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT , Jr. 5/3/2019 August 8, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.

Case 4:19-cv-00789-HSG Document 25 Filed 05/03/19 Page 3 of 3