Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01701/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01701-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1701

PAULINE ROWL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SMITH DEBNAM NARRON WYCHE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP; KIRSCHBAUM 

NANNEY KEENAN & GRIFFIN, PA; MONOGRAM CREDIT CARD BANK OF 

GEORGIA, a/k/a GE Financial Corporation, a/k/a GE Money 

Bank, a/k/a General Electric Capital Corporation, a/k/a 

General Electric Company, a/k/a General Electric Capital 

Services, Incorporated; IBM COASTAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, 

d/b/a Coastal Federal Credit Union, a/k/a Coastal Credit 

Union Service Organization Inc, a/k/a A.S.F. Inc of Wake 

County, d/b/a Coastal Federal Financial Group, LLC, a/k/a 

Atlantic States Financial Inc., a/k/a Atlantic States 

Financial LLC; THOMAS F. MOORE, Judge; RBS CITIZENS, N.A.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. 

Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:07-cv-00491-RJC-DLH)

Submitted: April 5, 2010 Decided: April 29, 2010

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pauline Rowl, Appellant Pro Se. Caren D. Enloe, SMITH DEBNAM 

NARRON WYCHE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; 

Appeal: 09-1701 Doc: 27 Filed: 04/29/2010 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Pamela P. Keenan, KIRSCHBAUM, NANNEY, KEENAN & GRIFFIN, PA, 

Raleigh, North Carolina; Jon Berkelhammer, SMITH MOORE, LLP, 

Greensboro, North Carolina; Jeffrey Phillips MacHarg, SMITH 

MOORE LEATHERWOOD LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Grady L. 

Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North 

Carolina; Willard Travis Barkley, BARKLEY LAW OFFICES, P.C., 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-1701 Doc: 27 Filed: 04/29/2010 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Pauline Rowl appeals the district court’s orders 

dismissing her federal civil rights suit. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Rowl v. Smith Debnam

Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP, No. 3:07-cv-00491-RJC-DLH

(W.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2009 & June 4, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-1701 Doc: 27 Filed: 04/29/2010 Pg: 3 of 3