Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03597/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03597-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLORIA SANCHEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-03597-JSC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. No. 17

Plaintiff Gloria Sanchez (“Plaintiff”) brings this foreclosure-related action against 

Defendant Central Mortgage Company (“Defendant”) alleging that Defendant engaged in fraud, 

violated the California Homeowners Bill of Rights, and is liable for breach of contract and breach 

of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing in connection with its roles as servicer of Plaintiff’s 

residential mortgage loan.1 (Dkt. No. 1.) Now pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to 

Dismiss, filed on October 8, 2015, in which Defendant seeks to dismiss the complaint in its 

entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) subdivisions (1) and (6). (Dkt. No. 17.) 

By operation of the Local Rules, Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion was due on October 22, 2015. 

See N.D. Cal. L.R. 7-3(a) (“The opposition must be filed and served not more than 14 days after 

the motion was filed.”). That deadline has come and gone, but Plaintiff has not filed an 

opposition. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE by November 9, 2015, why the 

Court should not grant Defendant’s motion. Plaintiff must explain her failure to timely oppose 

Defendant’s motion and must also file an opposition by that date. Plaintiff is warned that a failure 

to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute or to 

 

1

Plaintiff named MTC Financial, Inc. as a defendant in the complaint, but has since filed a notice 

of voluntary dismissal of claims against that entity. (Dkt. No. 12.) 

Case 3:15-cv-03597-JSC Document 29 Filed 11/02/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 30, 2015

________________________

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-03597-JSC Document 29 Filed 11/02/15 Page 2 of 2