Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01222/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01222-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: service@moorelawfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jose Acosta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ACOSTA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

W K M ASSOCIATES, INC., dba 

MAGUIRE’S CHEVRON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-cv-01222-DAD-EPG

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF 

MANDATORY SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON

WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for 

November 30, 2016, pursuant to the Court’s Minute Order dated September 1, 2016 (Dkt. 8);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Jose Acosta (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, W K M Associates, 

Inc. dba Maguire’s Chevron, and Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (collectively “Defendants,” and together

with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), are engaging in settlement discussions and wish to exhaust such 

efforts before incurring the fees and costs associated with the Scheduling Conference, and to 

conserve Court resources;

//

//

//

Case 1:16-cv-01222-DAD-EPG Document 17 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, 

stipulate to a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for November 

30, 2016 to a date at the Court’s convenience on or after January 17, 2017.

Dated: November 17, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore 

 Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

Jose Acosta

Dated: November 17, 2016 STAMMER, McKNIGHT, 

BARNUM & BAILEY LLP

/s/ Michael R. Hergenroether

 Michael R. Hergenroether

Attorneys for Defendant,

W K M Associates, Inc. dba Maguire’s Chevron

Dated: November 17, 2016 CALL & JENSEN

A Professional Corporation

/s/ Ryan M. McNamara

 Ryan M. McNamara 

Attorneys for Defendant,

Chevron U.S.A. Inc.

Case 1:16-cv-01222-DAD-EPG Document 17 Filed 11/18/16 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for 

November 30, 2016 is continued to January 30, 2017 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Erica 

P. Grosjean. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior 

to the conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 17, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01222-DAD-EPG Document 17 Filed 11/18/16 Page 3 of 3