Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00900/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00900-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAZIM KHAN and JAIBUL NISHA,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC; MORTGAGE

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,

INC., AS NOMINEE FOR GMAC

MORTGAGE, LLC F/K/A GMAC

MORTGAGE CORP., A LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY; EXECUTIVE

TRUSTEE SERVICES, LLC dba ETS

SERVICES, LLC AND; DOES 1

through 10, inclusive,

 Defendants.

________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2:10-cv-00900-GEB-JFM

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND

CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL

SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

The April 15, 2010, Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling)

Conference scheduled a status conference in this case for August 9,

2010, and required the parties to file a joint status report no later

than fourteen days prior to the status conference. The Order further

required a status report be filed regardless of whether a joint report

could be procured. No status report was filed.

Therefore, the parties are Ordered to Show Cause (“OSC”) in a

writing to be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on October 18, 2010, why

sanctions should not be imposed against them and/or their counsel under

Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to file

a timely status report. The parties shall also state in the written

Case 2:10-cv-00900-GEB -JFM Document 17 Filed 07/30/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

“If the fault lies with the attorney, that is where the impact 1

of sanction should be lodged. If the fault lies with the clients, that

is where the impact of the sanction should be lodged.” Matter of

Sanction of Baker, 744 F.2d 1438, 1442 (10th Cir. 1984), cert. denied,

471 U.S. 1014 (1985). Sometimes the faults of attorneys, and their

consequences, are visited upon clients. In re Hill, 775 F.2d 1385, 1387

(9th Cir. 1985).

The failure of one or more of the parties to participate in 2

the preparation of the Joint Status Report does not excuse the other

parties from their obligation to timely file a status report in

accordance with this Order. In the event a party fails to participate

as ordered, the party timely submitting the status report shall include

a declaration explaining why it was unable to obtain the cooperation of

the other party or parties.

2

response whether the parties or counsel are at fault, and whether a

hearing is requested on the OSC. If a hearing is requested, it will be 1

held on November 1, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., just prior to the status

conference, which is rescheduled to that date. A joint status report

shall be filed no later than fourteen days prior to the status

conference.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:10-cv-00900-GEB -JFM Document 17 Filed 07/30/10 Page 2 of 2