Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01502/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01502-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

-1- CASE NO. C 07-1502 MEJ

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SF/1403171v1

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802

MICHAEL WESTHEIMER Bar No. 178938

One Market Plaza

Steuart Tower, 8th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 781-7900

Facsimile: (415) 781-2635

Email: rebecca.hull@sdma.com

michael.westheimer@sdma.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.; Progressive 

Casualty Insurance Co. Long Term Disability Plan;

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), plaintiff David Harlan and 

defendants Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. Long Term 

Disability Plan, and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., by and through their attorneys, hereby 

stipulate and agree to an additional 30-day extension of time for defendants to file a response to 

plaintiff’s complaint, and that defendants’ response will be filed on or before June 11, 2007.

There has been one prior extension of time in this action, of 30 days, from April 11 to May 

11, 2007. The parties request the Court’s approval of a further extension because they have 

DAVID HARLAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY 

INSURANCE CO.; PROGRESSIVE 

CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. LONG 

TERM DISABILITY PLAN; and 

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

CO.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C 07-1502 MEJ

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

Case 3:07-cv-01502-MEJ Document 4 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:07-cv-01502-MEJ Document 5 Filed 05/10/07 Page 1 of 2
-2- CASE NO. C 07-1502 MEJ

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SF/1403171v1

reached a settlement in principle, but require additional time to complete the details of their 

agreement. The parties anticipate that an additional 30 days will be sufficient.

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

DATED: May 9, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF GEOFFREY V. WHITE

By:_/s/ Geoffrey V. White (as authorized on 5/9/07)

Geoffrey V. White

Attorneys for Plaintiff, David Harlan

DATED: May 9, 2007 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

By: /s/ Michael N. Westheimer

Rebecca A. Hull

Michael N. Westheimer

Attorneys for Defendants

Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.; Progressive Casualty 

Insurance Co. Long Term Disability Plan; Metropolitan 

Life Insurance Co.

ORDER

Upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.

May __, 2007

__________________________

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cv-01502-MEJ Document 4 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 2 of 2

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Maria-Elena James

Case 3:07-cv-01502-MEJ Document 5 Filed 05/10/07 Page 2 of 2