Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01614/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01614-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 195
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRIER SPECIALTY ROOFING CASE NO. CV-F-07-1614 LJO TAG

& COATINGS, INC., 

Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 10)

vs.

THE GLIDDEN COMPANY, 

erroneously sued as ICI Paints, 

Defendant.

_______________________________ /

On November 15, 2007, Defendant The Glidden Company, erroneously sued as ICI Paints

(“Glidden”) moved to dismiss the complaint for defect in service, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5)

and for a more definite statement, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e). On November 30, 3007, this Court

signed a stipulation and order provided by the parties (“the stipulation”). In the stipulation, the parties

agreed that Plaintiff Barrier Specialty Roofing & Coatings, Inc. (“Barrier Specialty”) would cure the

defect complaint and file a first amended complaint. Additionally, the parties agreed that Barrier

Specialty may effect service of process through mail service upon Glidden’s counsel of record.

In accordance with the stipulation, on December 19, 2007, Barrier Specialty filed a first amended

complaint, which was served on Glidden’s counsel of record electronically. Glidden’s counsel also

informed the Court that this motion made be taken off calendar. Accordingly, Glidden’s motion to

dismiss is moot and the clerk of court is directed to TERMINATE this motion. (Doc. 10). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01614-GSA Document 14 Filed 01/07/08 Page 1 of 1