Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01528/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01528-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRITTNEY FLOW-SUNKETT,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

RALPH DIAZ, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:19-cv-01528-AWI-GSA-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL

(ECF No. 6.)

ORDER DISMISSING THIS CASE, 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE 

TO COMPLY WITH COURT’S ORDER

(ECF No. 3.) 

ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

Brittney Flow-Sunkett (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se with this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 16, 2019 findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 

this action be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order. (ECF No. 6.) 

Plaintiff was granted fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the findings and 

recommendations. The fourteen-day time period has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed objections 

or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. The time for filing objections has 

expired.

Case 1:19-cv-01528-AWI-GSA Document 7 Filed 01/17/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on December 

16, 2019, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with 

a court order; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2020 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-01528-AWI-GSA Document 7 Filed 01/17/20 Page 2 of 2