Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00503/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00503-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEANETTE SMITH, 

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

DR. LARGOZA, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:12-cv-00503-LJO-GSA-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 10.)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH 

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A 

CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY 

BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT 

TO 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(G)

ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

Jeanette Smith (Aplaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 21, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending 

that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff=s failure to state a claim upon which relief may 

be granted under §1983. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings 

and recommendations within thirty days. The thirty-day deadline has passed, and plaintiff has 

not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

Case 1:12-cv-00503-LJO-GSA Document 11 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 

analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

November 21, 2013, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on plaintiff=s failure to state a 

claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983;

3. This dismissal is subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. '

1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011); and

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 31, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00503-LJO-GSA Document 11 Filed 01/02/14 Page 2 of 2