Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01600/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01600-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:1801 Farmworker Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joseph E. Herman, Esq. (SBN 58899)

Law Office of Joseph E. Herman

114 S. Rossmore Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90004

Telephone: (323) 937-1400

Facsimile: (323) 931-7369

Joseph C. Markowitz, Esq. (SBN 146592)

Law Offices of Joseph C. Markowitz

444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1750

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 437-1720

Facsimile: (213) 437-1721

Attorneys for Defendant Giumarra Vineyards Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANTOS R. VALENZUELA et al. on behalf

of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GIUMARRA VINEYARDS

CORPORATION, a California corporation;

and DOE 1 to 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:05-CV-01600-FVS-SMS

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION

OF DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE

RESPOND;

ORDER

Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties hereto, plaintiffs SANTOS R.

VALENZUELA et al. on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”) and

defendant GIUMARRA VINEYARDS CORPORATION, through their undersigned attorneys,

have agreed that Defendant will have a further 14 day extension of time to file an answer or

otherwise respond to the class action complaint in this case, served on Defendant GUIMARRA

VINEYARDS CORPORATION on or about December 21, 2005. The extension will run on

Case 1:05-cv-01600-AWI -SMS Document 51 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

February 24, 2006.

The parties previously stipulated to extend defendant’s time to respond to the

complaint for approximately 30 days, to February 10, 2006. That stipulation was “so ordered” by

Magistrate Beck on January 10, 2006. In light of all the activity in this case and the related case,

defendant requires additional time to formulate its response to the complaint. 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AND STIPULATE that

defendant’s answer or other responsive pleadings will be served and filed with the court no later

than Friday, February 24, 2006.

LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH E. HERMAN

and

Dated: February 2, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH C. MARKOWITZ

By: /s/ Joseph C. Markowitz 

Joseph C. Markowitz

Attorneys for Defendant

Giumarra Vineyards Corporation 

Dated: February 2, 2006 McNICHOLAS & McNICHOLAS, LLP

By: /s/ Matthew S. McNicholas 

Matthew S. McNicholas

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Santos R. Valenzuela, et al.

Joseph E. Herman, Esq. (SBN 58899)

Law Office of Joseph E. Herman

114 S. Rossmore Avenue

Case 1:05-cv-01600-AWI -SMS Document 51 Filed 02/06/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Los Angeles, CA 90004

Telephone: (323) 937-1400

Facsimile: (323) 931-7369

Joseph C. Markowitz, Esq. (SBN 146592)

Law Offices of Joseph C. Markowitz

444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1750

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 437-1720

Facsimile: (213) 437-1721

Attorneys for Defendant Giumarra Vineyards Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANTOS R. VALENZUELA et al. on behalf

of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GIUMARRA VINEYARDS

CORPORATION, a California corporation;

and DOE 1 to 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:05-CV-01600-FVS-SMS

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD

By written stipulation of Plaintiffs Santos R. Valenzuela et al. and Defendant

Giumarra Vineyards Corporation, the parties have agreed to extend the defendant’s time to

answer or otherwise plead to the class action complaint in this case, to February 24, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 6, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

Case 1:05-cv-01600-AWI -SMS Document 51 Filed 02/06/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01600-AWI -SMS Document 51 Filed 02/06/06 Page 4 of 4