Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01057/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01057-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICKEY LOUIS ALFORD aka

MORRIS DAY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1057 DFL DAD P

vs.

DAVINA TICHEN, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed June 14, 2005, plaintiff was ordered to pay the required filing fee

within twenty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that

this action be dismissed. The twenty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the

required filing fee or responded to the court’s order in any way. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 

Case 2:05-cv-01057-DFL-DAD Document 6 Filed 07/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 12, 2005.

DAD:lg

day1057.fpf

Case 2:05-cv-01057-DFL-DAD Document 6 Filed 07/13/05 Page 2 of 2