Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-02808/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-02808-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jose J. Rodriguez, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Deputy Warden Tucker, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 04-CV-2808-PHX-FJM

ORDER

In our order dated April 21, 2006, we granted petitioner's motion to strike respondents'

untimely objections and dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus without prejudice

(doc. 31). We have before us respondents' motion for reconsideration of that order (doc. 33).

Respondents creatively and incorrectly interpret the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation (doc. 26). Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation, either party must

submit their objection to the Report and Recommendation within 10 days of service thereof.

If a party files an objection, the adverse party has 10 days from the service of the objection

to file a response thereto. Contrary to respondents' contention, they do not have 10 days from

the due date for petitioner's objection in which to file their own objection.

Respondents substantially exceeded their 10 day period in which to file an objection.

Moreover, even if respondents' interpretation of the timing rules were correct, they should

have set forth their contention in a response to petitioner's motion to strike, but they did not

file a response.

Case 2:04-cv-02808-FJM Document 34 Filed 05/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Respondents failed to set forth any argument that would cause us to reconsider our

order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED DENYING the motion for reconsideration (doc. 33).

DATED this 5th day of May, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-02808-FJM Document 34 Filed 05/08/06 Page 2 of 2