Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02728/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02728-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Default

---

DLA PIPER US LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SA\8064826.1 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION BETWEEN MERIDIAN AND CMIC

 CASE NO. S-04-2728 FCD (DAD) 

SCOTT W. PINK (Bar No. 122383) 

MATTHEW G. JACOBS (Bar No. 122066) 

DLA PIPER US LLP

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2400 

Sacramento, CA 95814-4428 

Tel: 916-930-3200 

Fax: 916-930-3201 

DAVID PRIEBE (Bar No. 148679) 

DAVID BANIE (Bar No. 217924) 

RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA (Bar No. 234756) 

DLA PIPER US LLP 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2248 

Tel: 650-833-2000 

Fax: 650-833-2001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant 

MERIDIAN PROJECT SYSTEMS, INC. and 

Counter-defendant JOHN BODROZIC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MERIDIAN PROJECT SYSTEMS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HARDIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 

LLC, COMPUTER METHODS 

INTERNATIONAL CORP., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. CIV. S-04-2728 FCD DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING 

ACTION BETWEEN MERIDIAN PROJECT 

SYSTEMS, INC., JOHN BODROZIC, AND 

COMPUTER METHODS 

INTERNATIONAL CORP. WITH 

PREJUDICE

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

Case 2:04-cv-02728-FCD-DAD Document 262 Filed 07/12/07 Page 1 of 2
DLA PIPER US LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SA\8064826.1 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION BETWEEN MERIDIAN AND CMIC

 CASE NO. S-04-2728 FCD (DAD) 

 Plaintiff and Counter-defendant Meridian Project Systems, Inc. and Counter-defendant 

John Bodrozic (collectively “Meridian”), on the one hand, and Defendant and Counterclaimant 

Computer Methods International Corp. (“CMiC”), on the other hand, hereby stipulate to 

dismissing the entire action between Meridian and CMiC with prejudice, including all claims and 

counterclaims, each party to bear its own costs. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: ________________ DLA PIPER US LLP 

By 

SCOTT W. PINK 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant 

Meridian Project Systems, Inc. and Counterdefendant John Bodrozic 

Dated: _________________ BOUTIN DENTINO GIBSON DI GIUSTO 

HODELL INC. 

By 

CHRIS GIBSON 

Attorney for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

Hardin Construction Company, LLC and 

Computer Methods International Corp. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Dated: July 12, 2007 

 

Case 2:04-cv-02728-FCD-DAD Document 262 Filed 07/12/07 Page 2 of 2