Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00815/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00815-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SID LANDAU,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES FORREST, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB PC

ORDER VACATING SECOND

SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC. 110)

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE (DOC. 115)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO SEND PLAINTIFF COPY OF

DOCKET

Plaintiff Sid Landau (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 13, 2012, the Court issued a Second

Scheduling Order, and ordered Plaintiff to file a pretrial statement by April 13, 2012. On April

30, 2012, the Court issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for

failure to prosecute.

On May 4, 2012, Plaintiff filed his response. Plaintiff contends that the individual

assisting Plaintiff discontinued assistance on March 3, 2012. On March 4, 2012, Plaintiff

acquired a new assistant, who attempted unsuccessfully to retrieve all of Plaintiff’s records and

previously filed documents. Plaintiff requests additional time to prepare a pretrial statement, as

well as a copy of the docket in this case.

The Court finds good cause has been presented. The Court will direct the Clerk of the

Court to send Plaintiff a printed copy of the docket in this action. By separate order, a new

scheduling order will be issued. If Plaintiff fails to file a pretrial statement by the time specified,

the Court will issue a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. No

1

Case 1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB Document 118 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

further extensions of time will be granted regarding the filing of pretrial statements.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that

1. The Order To Show Cause, issued April 30, 2012, is discharged;

2. The Second Scheduling Order, issued February 13, 2012, is vacated; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a printed copy of the docket in

this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 31, 2012 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB Document 118 Filed 06/01/12 Page 2 of 2