Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05497/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05497-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ///

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANTS THOMAS J. PINKERTON AND GERALDINE

PINKERTON AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CV-09-5497-MMC 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

4328 Redwood Hwy., Suite 300

San Rafael, CA 94903

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IRMA RAMIREZ and 

Plaintiff DAREN HEATHERLY, each an individual

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IRMA RAMIREZ and DAREN

HEATHERLY, each an individual, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

FOSTER FREEZE SANTA ROSA a.k.a.,

THOMAS J. PINKERTON; and

GERALDINE PINKERTON,

Defendants. ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CV-09-5497-MMC

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR

ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE

DEFENDANTS THOMAS J. PINKERTON

AND GERALDINE PINKERTON AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 

This action was filed on November 19, 2009. Pursuant to General Order 56 and Civil

Local Rule 7-11, plaintiffs were to have defendants served on or before January 19, 2010. 

The defendants to this action are THOMAS J. PINKERTON AND GERALDINE

PINKERTON.

None of the defendants in this action have been served.

Despite diligent efforts, plaintiffs have been unsuccessful in their attempt to serve

defendants THOMAS J. PINKERTON AND GERALDINE PINKERTON with the summons

and complaint.

///

///

Case 3:09-cv-05497-MMC Document 5 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ///

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANTS THOMAS J. PINKERTON AND GERALDINE

PINKERTON AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CV-09-5497-MMC 2

 Shortly after the filing of the complaint, plaintiffs directed their process server to serve

defendants at the initial service address found on their online investigation database Merlin,

( 2476 Shady Creek Court, Santa Rosa, California). Plaintiffs’ process server made three (3)

attempts to serve defendants THOMAS J. PINKERTON AND GERALDINE PINKERTON, but

to no avail was plaintiffs’ process server able to serve defendants.

Because plaintiffs’ process server was unsuccessful in their attempts at ( 2476 Shady

Creek Court, Santa Rosa, California), plaintiffs further researched their online investigation

database Merlin, and discovered an updated address reported for defendants at (3107 Lucerro

Court, Santa Rosa, California). However, plaintiffs’ process server learned per a neighbor,

defendant GERALDINE PINKERTON lives at the address stated herein but defendant

THOMAS J. PINKERTON does not live there. Plaintiffs’ process server made six (6)

unsuccessful attempts at the address stated herein. Attached hereto as Exhibit “A” are the

Affidavits of Reasonable Diligence from plaintiffs’ process server.

 Therefore, plaintiffs would need to further investigate this matter and attempt to serve

defendants THOMAS J. PINKERTON and GERALDINE PINKERTON via FedEx. If plaintiffs

are unsuccessful in their attempt to serve defendants via FedEx, then plaintiffs will respectfully

request that this Court issue an Order permitting service on defendants through publication.

In light of the above, plaintiffs would respectfully request that the last day for plaintiffs

to complete service on defendants be continued for a period of 60-days to allow plaintiffs time to

either succeed at or exhaust their service efforts, and presuming that service is accomplished, to

allow the defendants time to file a responsive pleading.

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:09-cv-05497-MMC Document 5 Filed 01/22/10 Page 2 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ///

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANTS THOMAS J. PINKERTON AND GERALDINE

PINKERTON AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CV-09-5497-MMC 3

Plaintiffs would also request that the last day for the parties and counsel to conduct a joint

inspection of the premises be continued from March 1, 2010 to May 1, 2010, in order to give all

parties sufficient time to be served, appear, and meaningfully participate in the joint inspection.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 20, 2010 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/

Thomas E. Frankovich

Attorneys for Plaintiff IRMA RAMIREZ and

Plaintiff DAREN HEATHERLY, each an

individual

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that plaintiffs have an additional sixty (60) days from the date of

this Order to serve defendants THOMAS J. PINKERTON AND GERALDINE PINKERTON.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last day for the parties to conduct the joint inspection of

the premises be continued up to and including May 1, 2010.

Dated: ________________, 2010 ______________________________________

 Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

 United States District Judge

January 22

Case 3:09-cv-05497-MMC Document 5 Filed 01/22/10 Page 3 of 8
Case 3:09-cv-05497-MMC Document 5 Filed 01/22/10 Page 4 of 8
Case 3:09-cv-05497-MMC Document 5 Filed 01/22/10 Page 5 of 8
Case 3:09-cv-05497-MMC Document 5 Filed 01/22/10 Page 6 of 8
Case 3:09-cv-05497-MMC Document 5 Filed 01/22/10 Page 7 of 8
Case 3:09-cv-05497-MMC Document 5 Filed 01/22/10 Page 8 of 8