Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION RE MAGISTRATE JUDGE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C 02-03378 JSW 

LYNN H. PASAHOW (State Bar No. 054283) 

J. DAVID HADDEN (State Bar No. 176148) 

DARREN E. DONNELLY (State Bar No. 194335) 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

DANIEL J. FURNISS (State Bar No. 73531) 

JOSEPH A. GRECO (State Bar No. 104476) 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400 

Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA INTEGRATION, 

INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, a 

Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA 

INTEGRATION, INC., formerly known as 

ACTA TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 02-03378 JSW 

STIPULATION RE MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-JSW Document 345 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 346 Filed 10/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION RE MAGISTRATE JUDGE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 2 

Case No. C 02-03378 JSW 

Pursuant to the Court's October 11, 2006 Order Re Cross-Motions for Summary 

Judgment, Plaintiff Informatica Corporation and Defendant Business Objects Data Integration, 

Inc. hereby stipulate, through their respective counsel, that the Court may assign this case to a 

magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial, provided that the Court select one of the 

magistrate judges listed below (the list is in alphabetical order; no order of preference is implied): 

• Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte 

• Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg 

• Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero 

 SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 23, 2006 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Darren E. Donnelly 

Darren E. Donnelly 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

Dated: October 23, 2006 TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP 

By: /s/ Joseph A. Greco 

Joseph A. Greco 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA 

INTEGRATION, INC. 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT this case is assigned to 

Magistrate Judge _______________________ for all purposes, including trial, and superseding 

any prior assignment. 

Dated: ______________ By: 

JEFFREY S. WHITE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-JSW Document 345 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 2 of 2

Elizabeth D. Laporte October 26, 2006

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 346 Filed 10/26/06 Page 2 of 2