Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00913/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00913-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 

________________________________________________________

ORDER

THE LAW OFFICES OF GARY W. GORSKI

Gary W. Gorski - SBN: 166526

Attorney at Law

1207 Front Street, Suite 22

Sacramento, CA 95814

916.965.6800

LoneWolfLaw@outlook.com

www.lonewolflaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 

 IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS JACOBS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF SAN JOSE MAYOR CHUCK REED, in 

both his individual and official capacities; CITY 

OF SAN JOSE; COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA; 

CITY OF SAN JOSE POLICE CHIEF ROB 

DAVIS, in both his individual and official 

capacities; COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 

SHERIFF LAURIE SMITH, in both her individual 

and official capacities; and STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL 

EDMUND G. BROWN, in his official capacity,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:10-cv-00913-TLN-EFB

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF=S EX PARTE 

APPLICATION FOR A STATUS 

CONFERENCE AND/OR CONTINUED STAY 

OF PROCEEDINGS

Courtroom 2, 15th floor

Honorable Judge Troy L. Nunley

 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Plaintiff=s Ex Parte Application for a Status Conference and/or 

Continued Stay of Proceedings is hereby granted as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all proceedings are stayed in this matter pending en banc review 

of the cases Peruta v. County of San Diego, 742 F. 3d 1144 (9th Circuit 2014)(9th Cir. Case No. 

10-56971) and Richards v. Prieto, (9th Cir. Case No. 11-16255) and that the stay shall remain in

Case 2:10-cv-00913-TLN-EFB Document 14 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 

________________________________________________________

ORDER

effect pending further order of the Court.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that time is enlarged for defendants to file responsive 

pleadings or motions 30 days after the stay is lifted.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file notices of appearances, and that 

the filing of a notice of appearance shall not constitute a waiver of their right to bring a motion pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. ' 1404(a) to transfer the action for the convenience of the parties.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are obligated to notify this Court of 

decisions in Peruta v. County of San Diego, 742 F. 3d 1144 (9th Circuit 2014)(9th Cir. Case No. 

10-56971) and Richards v. Prieto, (9th Cir. Case No. 11-16255) within five working days after each has 

been filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2015

Case 2:10-cv-00913-TLN-EFB Document 14 Filed 03/17/15 Page 2 of 2