Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00250/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00250-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE K. COLBERT,

Plaintiff,

v.

P. CHAVEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:10-cv-00250-AWI-SAB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION, DENYING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REVOKE 

PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS 

AND REFERRING MATTER BACK TO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FURTHER 

PROCEEDINGS

(ECF No. 32)

Plaintiff George K. Colbert is a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in 

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 27, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings 

and Recommendations which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties 

that Objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. No 

Objections were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

Case 1:10-cv-00250-DAD-SAB Document 35 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on January 27, 2014, is adopted in full; 

and

2. Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is DENIED; and

3. The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 25, 2014 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00250-DAD-SAB Document 35 Filed 03/26/14 Page 2 of 2