Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00712/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00712-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Currently pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. On February 3, 

2017, Plaintiff requested permission to file a supplemental brief in response to a corrected reply 

brief by Defendants. See Doc. No. 41. The Court has reviewed the supplemental brief, which is 

in the nature of a sur-reply, and finds that consideration of the arguments made therein would be 

helpful. The Court will consider Plaintiff’s sur-reply, and permit Defendants the opportunity to 

file a response. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court will consider Plaintiff’s sur-reply/supplemental briefing (Doc. No. 41);

2. No later than February 14, 2017, Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff’s surreply/supplemental briefing.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 7, 2017 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

 

1 The Court is disinclined to accept further briefing, unless the Court itself expressly requests such briefing.

MELISSA M. NEYLON and SHAWN P. 

NEYLON,

Plaintiffs

v.

COUNTY OF INYO, INYO COUNTY 

SHERIFF’S OFFICE, BILL LUTZE, 

DOUGLAS RICHARDS, and DOES 1 to 

50,

Defendants

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-0712 AWI JLT 

ORDER RE REQUEST TO FILE A SURREPLY

(Doc. No. 19)