Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01867/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01867-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRAVARE GRANT,

Plaintiff,

v.

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-1867 MCE KJN (P)

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 14, 2015, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein

(ECF No. 37), which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to 

the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have filed 

objections to the Findings and Recommendations. ECF No. 39. On August 31, 2015, Plaintiff 

filed a pleading titled “Notice to the Court of Points and Authorities that Qualify Defendant Cate 

to be Liable for Civil Violations.” ECF No. 40. The Court construes Plaintiff’s pleading to be 

objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, the

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

Case 2:14-cv-01867-MCE-KJN Document 43 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

including the parties objections to the Findings and Recommendations, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 14, 2015 (ECF No. 37) are 

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 34) is GRANTED as to Defendant Cate and 

denied in all other respects; and

3. The remaining Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint 

(ECF No. 17) within twenty (20) days of the date that this order is electronically filed. 

IT SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 5, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-01867-MCE-KJN Document 43 Filed 10/07/15 Page 2 of 2