Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01901/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01901-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF #1345524 v1 -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REMAND OF ACTION TO STATE COURT 

CONSTANTIN V. ROBOOSTOFF, CA BAR NO. 69328 

ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN 

369 Pine Street, Suite 610 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 732-0282 

Facsimile: (415) 732-0287 

MORRIS NAZARIAN, CA BAR NO. 230275 

LAW OFFICES OF MORRIS NAZARIAN 

1875 Century Park East, Suite 850 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Telephone: (310) 277-2323 

Facsimile: (310) 556-2308 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TIMOTHY LEE POTTS 

SETH L. NEULIGHT, CA BAR NO. 184440 

TZADDI S. THOMPSON, CA BAR NO. 229018 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 371-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 371-1211 

Attorneys for Defendant 

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

TIMOTHY LEE POTTS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, 

INC.; KAISER PERMANENTE 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, a 

corporation; and DOES 1 through 100 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 2:07-CV-01901 LKK GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

REMAND OF ACTION TO STATE 

COURT 

Case 2:07-cv-01901-LKK -GGH Document 9 Filed 10/02/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF #1345524 v1 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REMAND OF ACTION TO STATE COURT 

The parties to the above-captioned action, Plaintiff Timothy Lee Potts (“Plaintiff”) and 

Defendant Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. (“Defendant”),1 by and through their respective 

attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Defendant removed this action from the Superior Court of the State of 

California, San Joaquin County (“State Court”) on the ground that this Court had federal question 

jurisdiction over that portion of the Third Cause of Action of Plaintiff’s Complaint alleging a 

claim for relief under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., and 

supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims; and 

WHEREAS, the Court has dismissed with prejudice Plaintiff’s FMLA claim pursuant to 

the parties’ stipulation; 

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant further stipulate to entry by the Court of an 

Order remanding this Action to the State Court, with each party to bear his or its own attorney’s 

fees and costs incurred with respect to the removal and remand. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 2, 2007 ROBOOSTOFF AND KALKIN 

By /s/ Constantin V. Roboostoff 

Constantin V. Roboostoff 

Dated: October 2, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF MORRIS NAZARIAN 

By /s/ Morris Nazarian 

Morris Nazarian 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TIMOTHY LEE POTTS 

 

1

 The named defendant “Kaiser Permanente Information Technology” is merely the name of an 

internal organization with Kaiser Permanente and is not itself a legal entity capable of being sued. 

Therefore, Kaiser Permanente Information Technology is not a separate party to this action. 

Case 2:07-cv-01901-LKK -GGH Document 9 Filed 10/02/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF #1345524 v1 -3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REMAND OF ACTION TO STATE COURT 

Dated: October 2, 2007 THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

By /S/ Seth L. Neulight 

Seth L. Neulight 

Attorneys for Defendant 

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, this action is HEREBY REMANDED to the Superior 

Court of the State of California, San Joaquin County. The parties shall bear their own respective 

attorney’s fees and costs. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 2, 2007. 

Case 2:07-cv-01901-LKK -GGH Document 9 Filed 10/02/07 Page 3 of 3