Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05808/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05808-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)

pandre@kramerlevin.com

LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)

lkobialka@kramerlevin.com 

JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)

jhannah@kramerlevin.com 

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS

 & FRANKEL LLP

990 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 752-1700

Facsimile: (650) 752-1800

Counsel for Plaintiff

FINJAN, INC.

JENNIFER A KASH (Bar No. 203679)

jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com

SEAN PAK (Bar No. 219032)

seanpak@quinnemanuel.com

IMAN LORDGOOEI (Bar No. 251320)

imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com

SAM STAKE (Bar No. 257916)

samstake@quinnemanuel.com

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4788

Telephone: (415) 875-6600

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

Counsel for Defendants

PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

FINJAN, INC., 

Plaintiff,

v.

PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendants. 

Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING OPENING DAUBERT

MOTIONS 

Trial Date: June 13, 2016

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 350 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 6
1

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and 

Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (“Defendants,” collectively with 

Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred in an effort to 

agree upon a modified schedule for certain pretrial deadlines:

WHEREAS, the trial in this matter is currently scheduled for June 13, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Pre-trial Conference in this matter is currently scheduled for May 24, 2016;

WHEREAS, opening Daubert motions are currently due on April 15, 2016;

WHEREAS, the parties have made substantial effort to work together in good faith to stipulate 

to narrow the potential issues in dispute by extending the deadline for opening Daubert motions by a 

week, without altering any other pretrial deadlines or the trial date;

WHEREAS, on April 12, 2016 the Court issued an Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part 

Motions for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 247);

WHEREAS, on April 13, 2016 Defendants supplemented certain financial data previously 

produced to Plaintiff (“supplemented financial data”);

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Plaintiff will serve a supplemental Expert Report of 

Dr. Anne Layne-Farrar by Monday, April 18, 2016 to solely update the financial data in the attached 

Schedules to reflect the supplemented financial data and the Court’s Order of April 12, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that in response Defendants will serve a supplemental 

Rebuttal Expert Report of Lance Gunderson by Wednesday, April 20, 2016 solely to update the 

financial data in the attached Schedules to reflect the supplemented financial data and the Court’s 

Order of April 12, 2016 and to respond to Dr. Layne-Farrar’s supplemental schedules; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that each side may thereafter file a single Daubert opening 

brief of up to 25 pages, but nothing in this stipulation precludes either side from seeking leave to file 

an opening brief with additional pages upon a showing of good cause;

WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request the Court re-schedule the following pre-trial 

deadlines:

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 350 Filed 04/14/16 Page 2 of 6
2

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Original 

Deadline

Stipulated 

Proposed New 

Deadline

Event

April 15, 2016 April 22, 2016 Opening Daubert Motions due

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate to and respectfully request certain pretrial 

submissions deadlines be set as stipulated and proposed in the table above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 350 Filed 04/14/16 Page 3 of 6
3

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: April 14, 2016

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ James Hannah

Paul J. Andre (SBN 196585)

Lisa Kobialka (SBN 191404)

James Hannah (SBN 237978)

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS

 & FRANKEL LLP

990 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 752-1700

Facsimile: (650) 752-1800

pandre@kramerlevin.com

lkobialka@kramerlevin.com 

jhannah@kramerlevin.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff

FINJAN, INC.

Dated: April 14, 2016

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Jennifer A. Kash__________

Jennifer A Kash (Bar No. 203679)

Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)

Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)

Sam Stake (Bar No. 257916)

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4788

Telephone: (415) 875-6600

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com

seanpak@quinnemanuel.com

imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com

samstake@quinnemanuel.com

Counsel for Defendants

PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 350 Filed 04/14/16 Page 4 of 6
4

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.

/s/ Peter Klivans

Peter Klivans

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 350 Filed 04/14/16 Page 5 of 6
5

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Parties shall brief Daubert motions as set forth in the April 14, 2016 Stipulation 

Regarding Opening Daubert Motions. 

DATED: April 14, 2016 ___________________________

The Honorable Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 4:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 350 Filed 04/14/16 Page 6 of 6