Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02060/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02060-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AZHAR LAL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2060 GEB EFB

vs.

T. FELKER,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On March 1, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed February 11, 2010, denying his December 28, 2009 motion for protection of

legal property. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that

it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling denying plaintiff’s motion was clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.

////

////

////

////

////

Case 2:07-cv-02060-KJM-EFB Document 88 Filed 03/31/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 The court has already affirmed the magistrate judge’s February 11, 2010 order in 

the context of defendants’ motion for reconsideration regarding discovery issues. For clarity’s

sake, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the portion of the magistrate 

judge’s February 11, 2010 denying plaintiff’s motion for protection of legal property, is affirmed. 

Dated: March 30, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-02060-KJM-EFB Document 88 Filed 03/31/10 Page 2 of 2