Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-mc-00027/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-mc-00027-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEWCO ENERGY ACQUISITIONS 

HOLDINGS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID SCHULGEN, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:15-mc-00027 SKO

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE MOTION TO ENFORCE 

JUDGMENT AND REASSIGNING CASE

Old Case Number: 1:15-mc-00027 SKO

New Case Number: 1:15-mc-00027 JLT

The Court is in receipt of Defendants and Judgment Creditors David Shulgen’s and Jeff 

Duff’s “Motion Authorizing Sale of Stock and Credit Bid,” filed November 30, 2016 (the 

“Motion”), pursuant to a Writ of Execution issued February 24, 2016. (Doc. 12) Under 

California Code of Civil Procedure § 699.510(a) 1, the Writ of Execution expired 180 days after 

issuance, or August 22, 2016. Accordingly, the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

subject to being renewed upon issuance of a valid Writ of Execution, see Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 

699.510(a), and the hearing set for January 4, 2017, is VACATED.

Furthermore, due to the location of the parties, in particular the judgment creditors, and of 

the proposed location for the execution sale, the Court has determined that this case should be 

reassigned to the docket of United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston in the Bakersfield 

Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

//

 

1 A federal district court has the authority to enforce money judgments in accordance with the practice and procedure 

of the state in which it sits. Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a); Paul Revere Ins. Grp. v. United States, 500 F.3d 957, 960 (9th Cir. 

2007).

Case 1:15-mc-00027-JLT Document 13 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The new case number shall be 1:15-mc-00027 JLT. All future pleadings shall be so 

numbered. Failure to use the correct case number may result in delay in documents being 

received by the correct judicial officer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-mc-00027-JLT Document 13 Filed 01/03/17 Page 2 of 2