Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02070/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02070-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERCE PERRY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2070 WBS DAD P

vs.

CRIMINAL RESPONSE TEAM, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed November 20, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed

application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days. In

addition, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days’ leave to file an amended complaint

was granted. On January 10, 2007, plaintiff was granted an extension of time to February 23,

2007, in which to comply with the court’s previous order. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to

do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The entire time period has

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, has

not paid the appropriate filing fee, has not filed an amended complaint, and has not otherwise

responded to the court’s order. 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110 (E.D. Cal. 1997); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Case 2:06-cv-02070-WBS-DAD Document 14 Filed 03/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 6, 2007.

DAD:lg

perr2070.fifp.fta

Case 2:06-cv-02070-WBS-DAD Document 14 Filed 03/07/07 Page 2 of 2