Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04343/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04343-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY TUKAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-04343-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

The deadline to 

amend the pleadings 

has passed

Fact discovery cut-off 08/28/15

Expert disclosures 09/18/15

Expert rebuttal 10/09/15

Mediation deadline 10/23/15

Expert discovery cut-off 10/23/15

Deadline to file dispositive motions 11/13/15

Pretrial conference statement due 01/26/16

Pretrial conference 02/05/16 at 2:00 p.m.

Case 3:14-cv-04343-JST Document 34 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Trial 2/29/16 at 8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) Eight

The Court will conduct a further case management conference on November 10, 2015. A 

joint case management statement is due ten days beforehand. 

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 26, 2015

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-04343-JST Document 34 Filed 02/26/15 Page 2 of 2