Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01076/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01076-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE,

Plaintiff,

v.

N. GRANNIS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01076-SMS PC

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

(Docs. 36 and 37)

Plaintiff Ruchell Cinque Magee, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Plaintiff filed motions seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on May 29, 2009, and

October 13, 2009. On October 16, 2009, an order issued denying Plaintiff’s motion for leave to

proceed in form a pauperis and requiring Plaintiff to pay $350 filing fee within twenty days. On

October 30, 2009, Plaintiff appealed that order. On March 12, 2010, Plaintiff’s appeal was

dismissed for failure to prosecute. On March 24, 2010, an order issued requiring Plaintiff to pay

the $350.00 filing fee within twenty (20) days. 

On April 05, 2010, the Court received and subsequently reviewed a document filed by

Plaintiff mis-titled as “Motion to Vacate Judgment” (Doc. 36.) The document is not a motion. 

Rather, it is a five page rant with personal attacks on the judiciary. The document’s content does

not deserve a substantive response. On April 21, 2010, the Court received and subsequently

reviewed a document filed by Plaintiff titled as “Request Judgment on Motion to Vacate

Judgment” (Doc. 37) wherein Plaintiff requests “judgment” on his mis-titled “Motion to Vacate

1

Case 1:09-cv-01076-SMS Document 38 Filed 04/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Judgment.” 

The filing fee due (see Orders of this Court dated October 16, 2009 and March 24, 2010)

has never been paid, and the Orders remain without compliance. (Docs. 17 and 34.)

The Court HEREBY ORDERS that this case be dismissed without prejudice, and the

Clerk of the Court is ordered to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-01076-SMS Document 38 Filed 04/28/10 Page 2 of 2