Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05609/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05609-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LITTLER MENDELSON

50 West San Fernando Stteel

Fourteenth Floor

San Jose. CA 95113.2303

408.996.4150

NEDAN. DAL CIELO, Bar No. 161982

SUZANNE R. NESTOR, Bar No. 217984

LITTLER MENDELSON

A Professional Corporation

50 West San Fernando Street, 15th Floor

San Jose, CA 95113.2303

Telephone: 408.998.4150

Attorneys for Defendant

DISH NETWORK CALIFORNIA SERVICE CORPORATION,

A Colorado Corporation, (sued erroneously herein as

"ECHOSTAR, DBA DISH NETWORK)

FRANK E. MAYO, Bar No. 042972

LAW OFFICE OF FRANK E. MAYO

5050 El Camino Real, Suite 228

Los Altos, CA 94022

Telephone: 650.964.8901

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOHN ALLIEU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JOHN ALLIEU, Case No. C 07-05609 JW

Plaintiff,

v.

ECHOSTAR dba DISH NETWORK A

Colorado Corporation, and DOES 1

through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

STIPULATION SELECTING ADR

PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR Process:

Court Processes:

D Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

D Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

Firmwide:84175350.1 049145.1005

1. STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge James Ware

2/7/2008

Case 5:07-cv-05609-JW Document 14 Filed 02/07/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7.

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

D Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties 'who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR

phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone

Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5).

Private Process:

[*D Private ADR (please identify process and provider)'The parties are discussing the

selection of a private mediator.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

D The presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered)

El other requested deadline: 150 days

Dated: ^<57^/

NEDA'N. DAL ClELO /

SUZANNE R. NESTOR

LITTLER MENDELSON

Attorneys for Defendant

DISH NETWORK CALIFORNIA SERVICE

CORPORATION, A Colorado Corporation,

(sued erroneously herein as "ECHOSTAR, DBA

DISH NETWORK)

Dated:

FRANK E. MAYO

LAW OFFICE OF FRANK E. MAYO

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOHN ALLIEU

LITTLER MENDELSON

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

50 West San Fernando Street

Fourteenth F!oo<

San Jose. CA 95113.2303

408.998.4150 Firmwide: 84175350.1 049145.1005

2. STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Case 5:07-cv-05609-JW Document 14 Filed 02/07/08 Page 2 of 3
Feb . 1. 2008 10:27A M

01-2S-ua ui-.sipm rrom-LllTLER ffiNDElSON 408 920 9753

N o. 5876 P. 3

T-052 P.008/006 F-566

D Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) * , , .

• •

Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR LR. 3-J;.

Private Process:

• Priv*e ADR PM. HM» *•— «* /w^/DMrthUBJ1*"*1**1

election of n rtrTM** mediator.

The parties agree to hold ihe ADR session by:

D

The presumptive deadline (The deadline ti 90 days from The dale of the order

referring the case to an ADRprocess unless otherwise ordered)

11

12

13

14

.15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ura£RMEMD£lSON

,r - — .

!3

other requested deadline: ISO ^V3-

Dated: WJswfkN.DALCmO

SUZANNE R. NESTOR

LITTLER MENDELSON

Attorneys for Defendant _

DISH NETWORK CALIFORNIA SERVICE

CORPORATION A Colorado CorpoTa^n,

(sued erroneously herein as "ECHOSTAR, DBA

DISH NETWORK)

Dated: '/~3/~08_

S^OFISFRANKRMAYO

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOHN ALLIED

2. CTTPTn.ATTON SELECTING ADR PROCESS I

Case 5:07-cv-05609-JW Document 14 Filed 02/07/08 Page 3 of 3