Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01903/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01903-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS DOMINGUEZ-CRUZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1903 MCE DAD P

vs.

ROACH, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed a document styled, “Objections To Magistrate Judge’s Findings

And Recommendations.” Rather than setting forth his objections, however, plaintiff instead

requests that the court grant him thirty days from the date of his request to file his objections. 

The court will grant the requested extension. However, plaintiff is advised that the purpose of

the objections is merely to inform the court of “those portions of the report or specified proposed

findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(C). An extensive

legal brief is not necessary. Therefore, no further extensions will be granted for this purpose. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's February 4, 2006 document styled, “Objections To Magistrate

Judge’s Findings And Recommendations,” which is construed as a request for an extension of

time, is granted; and

2008

Case 2:04-cv-01903-MCE -DAD Document 48 Filed 02/13/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Plaintiff shall file his objections to the findings and recommendations on or

before March 4, 2008. No further extensions will be granted for this purpose. 

DATED: February 13, 2008.

DAD:4

domi1903.36obj

Case 2:04-cv-01903-MCE -DAD Document 48 Filed 02/13/08 Page 2 of 2