Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00423/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00423-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY LAMON, No. CIV S-03-0423-FCD-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

C.K. PLILER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 22, 2005, the court directed plaintiff to

show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to inform the court and

defendants of a change of address, as required by Eastern District of California Local Rule 83-

183(b). Based on plaintiff’s recent filings, it appears that the court’s docket now reflects

plaintiff’s correct address. The order to show cause will, therefore, be discharged.

A review of the docket reflects that, on February 1, 2005, the court issued findings

and recommendations regarding defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. The findings and recommendations were adopted in full by order issued

on April 28, 2005. Pursuant to that order, plaintiff’s unexhausted claims were dismissed without

Case 2:03-cv-00423-AK Document 79 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

prejudice. The order also contemplates that plaintiff will file a fourth amended complaint which

omits unexhausted claims, thereby allowing this action to proceed on exhausted claims only. The

court will hereby set a date by which plaintiff must comply. Plaintiff shall not allege any

additional claims, or name any additional defendants. Plaintiff is warned that failure to file an

amended complaint within the time provided in this order may be grounds for dismissal of this

action. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-01 (9th Cir. 1992); see also Local Rule 11-

110. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The court’s September 22, 2005, order to show cause is discharged;

2. Plaintiff shall file and serve on defendants a fourth amended complaint

which omits unexhausted claims within 30 days of the date of service of this order; and

3. Defendants shall file a response to plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint

within 20 days of the date of service thereof.

DATED: November 8, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-00423-AK Document 79 Filed 11/10/05 Page 2 of 2