Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965-33/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYNOSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ATOPTECH, INC.,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

No. C-13-02965-MMC (DMR)

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL

SUBMISSION RE: JOINT DISCOVERY

LETTER [DOCKET NO. 193]

Before the court is a joint discovery letter filed by the parties. [Docket No. 193.] In the

letter, Synopsys references its responses to ATopTech’s interrogatories regarding Synopsys’

definition of input/output formats and Synopsys’ identification of instances of ATopTech’s copying

of Synopsys’ input/output formats. The interrogatories and responses are not attached to the letter.

By February 9, 2015 at 4:00 p.m., the parties shall meet and confer and file with the court

ATopTech’s interrogatories or requests for admission regarding the above topics, as well as

Synopsys’ response(s). In addition, if any witness for Synopsys has provided deposition testimony

on the above topics, the parties shall file the relevant excerpts from the deposition transcripts.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 5, 2015 

 DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 217 Filed 02/05/15 Page 1 of 1