Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03883/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03883-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

4850-7128-6321.v1

VERNON H. GRANNEMAN, SB #083532

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

2550 Hanover Street

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1115

Telephone: (650) 233-4500

Facsimile: (650) 233-4545

Attorneys for Defendant

NETSEER, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MEDIA.NET ADVERTISING FZ-LLC, a 

Foreign Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NETSEER, INC., a Delaware Corporation 

and DOES, 1-10, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 3:14-cv-3883-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT 

NETSEER INC.’S TIME TO FILE ITS

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF 

MEDIA.NET’S SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

Judge: Hon. Edward Chen

Location Ctrm. 5, 17th Fl.

Case 3:14-cv-03883-EMC Document 79 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:14-cv-03883-EMC Document 81 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 3
- 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

4850-7128-6321.v1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Media.Net Advertising FZ-LLC (“Media.Net”) and Defendant NetSeer, Inc.

(“NetSeer”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate and 

agree as follows:

1. Media.net filed its Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) in this action on April 2, 

2016. NetSeer’s response to the SAC was originally due to be filed on April 21, 2016.

2. During the Case Management Conference conducted by the Court in this matter 

on April 7, 2016, counsel for NetSeer proposed to extend NetSeer’s time to respond to the SAC 

to Thursday, May 5, 2016. Counsel for Media.net agreed and the Court approved the extension.

3. On May 3, 2016, counsel for NetSeer requested an additional one week extension 

to May 12, 2016 to afford NetSeer additional time to respond to the SAC. Counsel for Media.net 

is agreeable to the requested extension of time.

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and request an order as follows:

That NetSeer shall have up to and including Thursday, May 12, 2016 within which to file 

its response to Media.Net’s SAC.

Dated: May 4, 2016.

/s/ Leeor Neta

Leeor Neta

Attorney for Plaintiffs Media.Net 

Advertizing FZ-LLC

/s/ Vernon H. Granneman

Vernon H Granneman

Attorney for Defendant NetSeer, Inc.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5.1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been obtained from Leeor Neta.

/s/ Vernon H. Granneman

Vernon H. Granneman

Case 3:14-cv-03883-EMC Document 79 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:14-cv-03883-EMC Document 81 Filed 05/09/16 Page 2 of 3
- 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

4850-7128-6321.v1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. 

Date: _________________ _______________________________

Honorable Edward Chen

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-03883-EMC Document 79 Filed 05/04/16 Page 3 of 3

May 9, 2016

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-03883-EMC Document 81 Filed 05/09/16 Page 3 of 3