Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00084/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00084-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Dennis Andrew Ball, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

City of Peoria; Peoria Police Department,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 09-84-PHX-JAT

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #3) is

denied without prejudice because it is incomplete. Specifically, in response to question 3,

Plaintiff answered “yes” but failed to state the amount received from each source of income

within the last twelve months as is required by Local Rule Civil 3.3(a)(3)(B) and (E). Within

10 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall either re-file his application to proceed in

forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. If Plaintiff fails to do either of these things within 10

days, the Clerk of the Court shall, without further Order from this Court, dismiss this case,

without prejudice, due to Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to assign this case to Magistrate

Judge Duncan (Doc. #4) is denied because it was filing in the wrong case (see Local Rule

Civil 42.1).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for mediation (Doc. #5) is

denied.

Case 2:09-cv-00084-JAT Document 8 Filed 02/06/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for service by the U.S. Marshals

(Doc. #6) is denied as premature because Plaintiff has yet to be conferred in forma pauperis

status.

DATED this 6th day of February, 2009.

Case 2:09-cv-00084-JAT Document 8 Filed 02/06/09 Page 2 of 2