Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01516/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01516-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTWOINE BEALER,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

R. BRANNUM, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:12-cv-01516-DAD-EPG-PC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

DISCOVERY REQUESTS AS 

ORDERED BY THE COURT

(ECF No. 136.)

DEADLINE: MAY 20, 2016

Antwoine Bealer (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On May 13, 2016, Defendants filed a motion for extension of time to respond to 

Plaintiff’s discovery requests as ordered by the Court at the April 28, 2016 hearing. (ECF No. 

136.) The Court originally ordered the responses due on May 13, 2016; however, to date the 

Court has not issued the order following the hearing, outlining the exact phrasing of the 

questions and the formatting requirements. (Sloan Decl., ECF No. 136 at 2 ¶5.) Defendants

have diligently prepared their responses based on notes taken at the hearing. (Id. ¶6.) 

However, they want to be confident their responses fully address all items ordered of them. 

(Id.) Defendants request an additional 7 days, up to and including May 20, 2016, to respond.

Case 1:12-cv-01516-DAD-EPG Document 137 Filed 05/13/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendants have shown good cause for the Court to grant their motion for extension of 

time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted an extension of 

time until May 20, 2016, in which to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests as ordered by the 

Court at the April 28, 2016 hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 13, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01516-DAD-EPG Document 137 Filed 05/13/16 Page 2 of 2