Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03548/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03548-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAARMAN CONSTRUCTION, LTD,

Plaintiff,

v.

IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-03548-JST 

PRETRIAL ORDER

The Court now has before it the parties’ August 23, 2016 pretrial statement. ECF No. 90. 

The statement lists the model jury instructions each party requests, but does not provide the actual 

instructions. The parties are ordered to file such instructions by August 26, 2016 at 12:00 p.m.; to 

bring a courtesy copy of the instructions to court on August 26; and to e-mail the set in Microsoft 

Word format to the Courtroom Deputy at jstcrd@cand.uscourts.gov. The set should begin with 

the instructions to which the parties agree, in the order they are to be read to the jury, followed by 

the instructions proposed by plaintiff and objected to by defendant, followed by the instructions 

proposed only by defendant and objected to by plaintiff. The proposed instructions must be in 

final form, must use the precise words appropriate to the case, and must not include blanks. As set 

forth in the Court’s standing order for Civil Jury Trials, the parties must clearly indicate any 

modifications to pattern instructions. 

The parties also dispute whether certain witnesses were disclose in the parties’ initial 

disclosures or in response to discovery requests. See, e.g., ECF No. 90 at 19-20. The parties are 

ordered to bring copies of their initial disclosures, any supplemental disclosures, any relevant 

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:15-cv-03548-JST Document 91 Filed 08/24/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

discovery requests, and the responses to those requests to the pretrial conference so that their 

objections may be resolved. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 24, 2016

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-03548-JST Document 91 Filed 08/24/16 Page 2 of 2