Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

STORUS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC., AROA

MARKETING, INC. dba GADGET

UNIVERSE; SKYMALL, INC., DOES 1-20,

Defendants. /

No. C06-02454 HRL

ORDER (1) DISCHARGING MAY 24,

2006 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; AND

(2) DENYING AS MOOT APPLICATION

FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO

HAC VICE

[Re: Docket No. 7]

On May 24, 2006, this court issued an Order to Show Cause why Michael Anatole’s

application for admission pro hac vice should be granted. Among other things, it seemed that

he might be disqualified from such an appearance under Civil Local Rule 11-3(b).

Mr. Anatole has informed the court that he actually seeks admission to the bar of this

court under Civil Local Rule 11-1, and not admission pro hac vice. He further advised that his

check, which he says was intended to cover the requisite fees for membership to the bar of this

court, was mischaracterized as payment of fees for admission pro hac vice. In view of the

foregoing, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. This court’s May 24, 2006 Order to Show Cause is discharged.

2. Mr. Anatole’s application for admission pro hac vice is DENIED as MOOT.

3. To the extent he has not already done so, Mr. Anatole shall follow the court’s

*E-FILED ON 6/2/06*

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 14 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

procedures for admission to the bar of this court. Mr. Anatole’s previously received fee

payment shall be applied toward his application for admission under Civil Local Rule 11-1.

Dated:

 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

June 2, 2006

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 14 Filed 06/02/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:06-cv-2454 Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

Eric P. Jacobs epj@townsend.com, dgsunnen@townsend.com 

Yano Lee Rubinstein , Esq yrubinstein@rublaw.com, tcaudle@rublaw.com 

Joseph J. Zynczak jjz@dillinghammurphy.com, 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have

not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Courtesy copy will be mailed to: 

Michael Anatole

1076 Rambling Road

Simi Valley, CA 93065

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 14 Filed 06/02/06 Page 3 of 3