Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06286/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06286-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO ALLOW COMBINED 

BRIEFS 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. (75484) 

Email: jtabacco@bermanesq.com 

Christopher T. Heffelfinger (118058) 

Email: cheffelfinger@bermanesq.com 

Nicole Lavallee (165755)

Email: nlavallee@bermanesq.com 

Julie J. Bai (227047) 

Email: jbai@bermanesq.com 

BERMAN, DeVALERIO, PEASE, TABACCO

 BURT & PUCILLO 425 California Street, Suite 2100 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-3200

Facsimile: (415) 433-6382 

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs 

[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, 

LTD. SECURITIES LITIGATION 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Master File No. 06-06286 RMW 

CLASS ACTION 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

TO ALLOW COMBINED BRIEFS 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 

 All Actions. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Lead Plaintiffs Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, Monte Paschi 

Asset Management S.G.R. S.p.A. and Puerto Rico Government Employees Retirement System 

(“Lead Plaintiffs”) and defendants Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. (“Marvell”), Weili Dai 

(“Dai”), Sehat Sutardja (“Sutardja”), George Hervey (“Hervey”) and John M. Cioffi (Cioffi”), by 

and through their respective counsel, hereby recite and stipulate, subject to Court approval, as 

follows. 

*E-FILED - 12/19/07*

Case 5:06-cv-06286-RMW Document 171 Filed 12/19/07 Page 1 of 6
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO ALLOW COMBINED 

BRIEFS 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

RECITALS 

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation and proposed order dated September 21, 2007, Lead 

Plaintiffs and defendants Marvell, Dai, Sutardja and Hervey stipulated that (i) these defendants 

would file their motions to dismiss by October 18, 2007; (ii) Lead Plaintiffs would file their 

opposition to these motions to dismiss on December 21, 2007; and (iii) these defendants would file 

their reply papers on January 21, 2008; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation and proposed order dated October 29, 2007 and 

approved by the Court on November 2, 2007, Lead Plaintiffs and defendant Cioffi stipulated that 

the briefing schedule set forth immediately above with respect to opposition and reply papers 

would also apply to the motion to dismiss filed by Cioffi on October 29, 2007; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation and proposed order dated October 15, 2007, Lead 

Plaintiffs and defendant Marvell stipulated that Marvell could file memoranda of points and 

authorities of thirty pages instead of the twenty-five pages permitted under the Local Rules; 

WHEREAS, on October 18, 2007, defendant Marvell filed a thirty page memorandum of 

points and authorities in support of its motion to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint 

(“Complaint”); 

WHEREAS, on October 18, 2007, defendants Dai and Sutardja filed a twenty-six page 

memorandum of points and authorities in support of their joint motion to dismiss the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, on October 18, 2007, defendant Hervey filed a twenty-five page memorandum 

of points and authorities in support of his motion to dismiss the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, defendants Marvell, Dai, Sutardjia and Hervey also filed three separate 

requests for judicial notice; 

WHEREAS, on October 29, 2007, defendant Cioffi filed a twenty-two page memorandum 

of points and authorities in support of his motion to dismiss the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, counsel for all parties agree that Lead Plaintiffs may file (i) one combined 

memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed 75 pages (less than the total number of pages 

for all four motions to dismiss filed by defendants) in opposition to defendants’ separate motions to 

dismiss; and (ii) one combined memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the three 

Case 5:06-cv-06286-RMW Document 171 Filed 12/19/07 Page 2 of 6
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO ALLOW COMBINED 

BRIEFS 3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

requests for judicial notice; 

WHEREAS, counsel for all parties agree, in light of January 21, 2008 being a court holiday, 

to move the date defendants’ reply brief(s) is due from January 21, 2008, as set forth in the 

stipulation and proposed order dated September 21, 2007, to January 22, 2008; and 

WHEREAS, counsel for all parties agree that each defendant shall be permitted to file a 

reply memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed twenty (20) pages. 

STIPULATION 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Lead Plaintiffs and 

defendants, through their respective counsel of record, as follows: 

1. Lead Plaintiffs may file (i) one combined memorandum of points and authorities not 

to exceed seventy-five (75) pages in response to all defendants’ memoranda of points and 

authorities in support of their motions to dismiss; and (ii) one combined memorandum of points 

and authorities in opposition to defendants’ three requests for judicial notice. 

2. Defendants shall file their reply brief(s) no later than January 22, 2008. 

3. Each defendant shall be permitted to file a reply memorandum of points and 

authorities not to exceed twenty (20) pages. 

Dated: December 3, 2007 BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO 

BURT & PUCILLO 

By: /s/ Nicole Lavallee 

 NICOLE LAVALLEE 

Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. 

Christopher T. Heffelfinger 

Julie J. Bai 

425 California Street, Suite 2100 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-3200 

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs 

Case 5:06-cv-06286-RMW Document 171 Filed 12/19/07 Page 3 of 6
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO ALLOW COMBINED 

BRIEFS 4 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

KOHN, SWIFT & GRAF, P.C. 

Joseph C. Kohn 

William E. Hoese 

Denis F. Sheils 

Stephen H. Schwartz 

One South Broad Street, Suite 2100 

Philadelphia, PA 19107 

Telephone: (215) 238-1700 

SCHIFFRIN BARROWAY TOPAZ 

 & KESSLER, LLP 

Michael K. Yarnoff 

John Kehoe 

Robert Biela 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

Telephone: (610) 667-7706 

Co-Lead Counsel 

NIX PATTERSON & ROACH, LLP 

Jeffrey J. Angelovich 

Bradley E. Beckworth 

205 Linda Drive 

Daingerfield, TX 75638 

Telephone: (903) 645-7333 

Additional Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs

I, Nicole Lavallee, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order . In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest 

that Nicole Healy, Caroline McIntyre, Diane M. Doolittle and Laurence A. Weiss have 

concurred in this filing. 

Dated: December 3, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

By: /s/ Nicole Healy 

 NICOLE HEALY 

Steven M. Schatz 

Boris Feldman 

Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Counsel for Defendant Marvell Technology Group, 

Ltd. 

Case 5:06-cv-06286-RMW Document 171 Filed 12/19/07 Page 4 of 6
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO ALLOW COMBINED 

BRIEFS 5 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: December 3, 2007 BERGESON, LLP

By: /s/ Caroline McIntyre 

 CAROLINE MCINTYRE

Daniel J. Bergeson 

Donald P. Gagliardi 

Elizabeth D. Lear 

303 Almaden Blvd., Suite 500 

San Jose, CA 95110-2712 

Counsel for Defendant George Hervey 

Dated: December 3, 2007 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP

By: /s/ Diane M. Doolittle 

 DIANE M. DOOLITTLE

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

John M. Potter 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

Thad A. Davis 

Jennie L. Wang 

865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90017-2543 

Counsel for Defendants Weili Dai and Sehat Sutardja 

Dated: December 3, 2007 HELLER EHRMAN LLP

By: /s/ Laurence A. Weiss 

 LAURENCE A. WEISS 

Sara B. Brody 

Kristi K. Elder 

275 Middlefield Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Counsel for Defendant John M. Cioffi 

Case 5:06-cv-06286-RMW Document 171 Filed 12/19/07 Page 5 of 6
[C-06-06286 RMW] STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO ALLOW COMBINED 

BRIEFS 6 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[] ORDER 

 Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Lead Plaintiffs may file (i) one combined memorandum of points and authorities 

not to exceed seventy-five (75) pages in response to all defendants’ memoranda of points and 

authorities in support of their motions to dismiss; and (ii) one combined memorandum of points 

and authorities in opposition to defendants’ three requests for judicial notice. 

2. Defendants shall file their reply brief(s) no later than January 22, 2008. 

3. Each defendant shall be permitted to file a reply memorandum of points and 

authorities not to exceed twenty (20) pages. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: , 2007 

 

 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

 United States District Judge 

12/19 4. The hearing on the motions to dismiss shall be continued to February 15, 2008. (rmw)

Case 5:06-cv-06286-RMW Document 171 Filed 12/19/07 Page 6 of 6