Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01588/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01588-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

{1987664.DOC;} 1

Stip. & (Proposed) Order Continuing 

Hearing on Motion to Quash

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodinlaw corporation

Henry M. Burgoyne, III, State Bar No. 203748

BURGOYNE LAW GROUP

870 Market Street, Suite 985

San Francisco, California 94102

(916) 209-0910 – Tel.

(415) 680-2335 – Facsimile

Attorneys for Plaintiff SOURCIS, Inc.

James Kachmar, State Bar No. 216781

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin

law corporation

400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

(916) 558-6000 – Main

(916) 446-1611 – Facsimile

Attorneys for Non-Party Witness

BRAVO DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOURCIS, INC, a California corporation, 

Plaintiff,

v.

BRAVO DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., a 

California corporation; et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:15-cv-01588-TLN-KJN

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE: CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE 

ON NON-PARTY WITNESS BRAVO 

DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC’S MOTION 

TO QUASH, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

MOTION TO MODIFY SUBPOENA

Complaint Filed: July 23, 2015

FAC Filed: September 18, 2015

Plaintiff SOURCIS, INC. (“Plaintiff”) and Non-Party Witness Bravo Development 

Group, LLC (“Bravo LLC”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby submit the 

following Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re: Continuance of Hearing Date on NonParty Witness Bravo LLC’s Motion to Quash, or in the alternative, Motion to Modify 

Subpoena (“Motion to Quash”) (Dckt. # 25):

Case 2:15-cv-01588-TLN-KJN Document 47 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 3
{1987664.DOC;} 2

Stip. & (Proposed) Order Continuing 

Hearing on Motion to Quash

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodinlaw corporation

1. WHEREAS, on November 6, 2015, plaintiff served Non-Party Witness Bravo 

LLC with a subpoena duces tecum requiring the production of responsive documents by 

10 a.m. on November 16, 2015;

2. WHEREAS, on November 16, 2015, Non-Party Witness Bravo LLC filed its 

Motion to Quash, and scheduled the hearing on the motion for December 17, 2015;

3. WHEREAS, the parties to this action have reached an agreement to settle all 

disputes between them, including the claims asserted in this action, and are in the 

process of preparing a formal settlement agreement; 

4. WHEREAS, plaintiff and Bravo LLC believe that it is in the interests of the 

parties and the Court to continue the hearing on Bravo LLC’s Motion to Quash so that the 

settlement documents can be finalized and a stipulation for dismissal of this action filed 

with the Court.

THEREFORE, plaintiff and Bravo LLC hereby stipulate and request the Court to issue 

an Order that:

1. The hearing on Bravo LLC’s Motion to Quash is continued to January 21, 

2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: December 10, 2015 BURGOYNE LAW GROUP

By: /s/ - Henry M. Burgoyne, III

Henry M. Burgoyne, III

Attorneys for Plaintiff Sourcis, Inc.

Dated:December 10, 2015 WEINTRAUB TOBIN CHEDIAK COLEMAN GRODIN

Law Corporation

By: /s/ - James Kachmar

James Kachmar

Attorneys for Non-Party Witness Bravo Development 

Group, LLC

/ / /

Case 2:15-cv-01588-TLN-KJN Document 47 Filed 12/14/15 Page 2 of 3
{1987664.DOC;} 3

Stip. & (Proposed) Order Continuing 

Hearing on Motion to Quash

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodinlaw corporation

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 14, 2015

Case 2:15-cv-01588-TLN-KJN Document 47 Filed 12/14/15 Page 3 of 3