Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-05232/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-05232-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAN L. WHITNEY, JANET R. HADLEY,

MARGARET A. KORNOW-BROWN, ERIC

BRELLE,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CHARLES WURTZ, VERISCAPE, INC.,

RENEE TADLOCK, REGINA RYGELIS, WILL

ARNTZ, SAM JACOBS, GARY BERKOWITZ

and BRIAN ROE,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-04-05232 PVT

FINAL ORDER RE DEFENDANTS'

COUNSEL'S REQUEST FOR

CONTINUANCE 

On or about January 13, 2006, counsel to defendants Charles Wurtz, Veriscape, Inc.,

Regina Rygelis, Gary Berkowitz and Brian Rose (collectively "Defendants") submitted a

request to the court to continue the noticed hearings on plaintiffs' application for writ of

attachment and plaintiffs' motions to compel discovery. Defendants' counsel sought a four

week continuance of all the hearings because of his own illness. The hearing on the

discovery matters had been scheduled for January 31, 2006 and the hearing on the writ of

attachment had been scheduled for February 7, 2006. 

Case 5:04-cv-05232-PVT Document 61 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 3
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Although plaintiffs do not oppose the request for continuance, they have requested a specific

briefing schedule and hearing date to accommodate their own counsel's previously scheduled

professional commitments.

Accordingly, Defendants' request for continuance is granted. The hearings on

plaintiffs' motion to compel and plaintiffs' application for writ of attachment shall be held on

February 28, 2006 at 10 AM. Defendants shall file their opposition briefs to plaintiffs'

motion to compel and plaintiffs' application for writ of attachment no later than February 7,

2006. Plaintiffs shall file their reply briefs no later than February 14, 2006. 

Additionally, the Case Management Conference shall be held on February 28, 2006 at

2 PM.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2006 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 5:04-cv-05232-PVT Document 61 Filed 01/23/06 Page 2 of 3
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case 5:04-cv-05232-PVT Document 61 Filed 01/23/06 Page 3 of 3