Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02201/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02201-43/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MEDTRONIC, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

GEOFFREY WHITE,

Defendant.

 /

LOS ANGELES BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH

INSTITUTE AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL

CENTER,

Third-Party Intervenor and

Plaintiff,

 v.

GEOFFREY WHITE,

Defendant.

No. C 04-02201 JSW

ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO

DEPOSITIONS OF DR. MICHAEL

STEPHEN AND DR. SAMUEL

ERIC WILSON

The Court has received and considered the parties’ deposition designations for Drs.

Michael Stephen and Samuel Eric Wilson and the objections thereto. The Court’s rulings on

these objections are set forth in the remainder of this Order.

1. Dr. Michael Stephen

L.A. Biomed’s objections to page 31, lines 20-25 and page 32, lines 1-6 are sustained on

all bases raised.

L.A. Biomed’s objections to page 40, lines 22-25 are sustained.

L.A. Biomed’s objection to page 48, lines 5-18 are sustained on the ground that the 

Case 3:04-cv-02201-JSW Document 370 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

designation is leading.

L.A. Biomed’s objection to page 50, lines 17-25 and page 51, lines 1-2 are sustained on

the ground that the designation is leading.

L.A. Biomed’s objection to page 51, lines 21-25 and 52, line 1 is sustained on the

ground that the designation contains inadmissible hearsay.

L.A. Biomed’s objection to page 52, lines 17-25, is sustained on the ground that the

designation contains inadmissible hearsay.

L.A. Biomed’s objection to page 53, lines 1-8, is sustained on the grounds that the

designation contains inadmissible hearsay and under Federal Rule of Evidence 901.

L.A. Biomed’s objection to page 60, lines 8-24, is sustained on the ground that the

designation contains inadmissible hearsay.

All other objections are overruled.

2. Dr. Samuel Eric Wilson

All of L.A. Biomed’s objections are overruled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 14, 2006 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-02201-JSW Document 370 Filed 03/14/06 Page 2 of 2