Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-1_08-cv-01742/USCOURTS-alnd-1_08-cv-01742-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

JAMES DAVID SIMPSON, )

)

Plaintiff )

)

vs. ) Case No. 1:08-cv-01742-IPJ

)

TALLADEGA COUNTY, ALABAMA, )

et al., )

)

Defendants )

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously

herewith and with Rule 58, FED. R. CIV. P., it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and

DECREED that:

(1) the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Steven Giddens (Doc. #17) is due to

be and hereby is GRANTED; 

(2) the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Chad Woodruff (Doc. #19) is due to

be and hereby is GRANTED; 

(3) the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Warren Freeman (Doc. #22) is due

to be and hereby is GRANTED as to any federal claims made against him by

plaintiff;

FILED

 2010 Mar-22 PM 01:36

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 1:08-cv-01742-IPJ Document 45 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

(4) the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Talladega County,

Sheriff Jerry Studdard, and Deputy Sheriff Michael Jones (Doc. #29) is due to

be and hereby is GRANTED; 

(7) the Motion to Amend filed by plaintiff (Doc. #38) is due to be and hereby is

DENIED as futile as to Counts One, Two, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven,

Twelve, and Thirteen; 

(8) in the absence of any pending count arising under federal law, the court

DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims against

defendant Warren Freeman in the original complaint, and such claims are

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

(9) in the absence of any pending count arising under federal law, the court

DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Counts Three, Four,

Five, and Six of the proposed amended complaint and the Motion to Amend

as to these counts is due to be and hereby is DENIED; and 

(10) the Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this action, costs taxed as paid.

DONE this 22 day of March 2010. nd

 

INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:08-cv-01742-IPJ Document 45 Filed 03/22/10 Page 2 of 2