Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-02240/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-02240-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to

portions of the Report and Recommendation. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734,

739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Phillip Rose, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Sierra Vista, City of, et al. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 14-2240-TUC-JAS (CRP) 

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge

Pyle. In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Pyle recommends granting

Defendants’ motions to dismiss. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation

appropriately resolved the motions, Plaintiff’s objections are denied.1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Pyle’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 44) is accepted and adopted.

(2) Defendants’ motions to dismiss are granted.

(3) This case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment

and close the file in this case.

DATED this 3rd day of November, 2015.

Case 4:14-cv-02240-JAS-CRP Document 56 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 1