Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05741/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05741-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN ADAMS, et al., CASE NO. CV F 02-5741 LJO DLB

Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

RECONSIDER EXTENSION FOR

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE ON

vs. DEFENSE POLICE PRACTICES EXPERT

(Doc. 185.)

PAUL SPEERS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

This Court granted plaintiffs’ request to extend the deadlines on plaintiffs’ motion in limine to

address defense police practices expert Jared Zwickey. Defendant seeks reconsideration of the extension

on groundsthat one of plaintiffs’ attorneys was available to prepare the motion in limine pursuant to this

Court’s pretrial order schedule.

This Court appreciates defendant’s points. Nonetheless, this Court prefers to address, to the

extent possible, evidentiary issues prior to trial to promote trial expediency and efficiency. To that end,

this Court may issue rulings on any or all motions in limine without oral argument. Moreover,

defendant points to no prejudice from the extension. As such, this Court DENIES reconsideration of

the extension on plaintiffs’ motion in limine to address defense police practices expert Jared Zwickey.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 29, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05741-LJO-DLB Document 186 Filed 05/29/08 Page 1 of 1