Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01380/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01380-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

AT T ORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRA NCI SCO

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

To Continue Hearing Date

No. CIV 07-1380 FCD GGH PC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Timothy P. Crudo (Bar No. 143835)

Brendan A. McShane (Bar No. 227501)

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, California 94111-6538

Telephone: +1.415.391.0600

Facsimile: +1.415.395.8095

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RYAN A. BARNES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RYAN A. BARNES,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SUTTER, OFFICER WILLY 

MITCHELL, and OFFICER J. RUONA,

Defendants.

No. CIV S 07-1380 FCD GGH PC

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT 

PURSUANT TO FRCP 49, 58, 59 OR IN THE 

ALTERNATIVE, RENEWED MOTION FOR 

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 50(B)

Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows

CON

Case 2:07-cv-01380-GGH Document 162 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 3
AT T ORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRA NCI SCO 1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

To Continue Hearing Date

No. CIV 07-1380 FCD GGH PC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Ryan A. Barnes (“Plaintiff”) and defendant County of Sutter 

(“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned counsel, and subject to approval of the court, 

stipulate to the following, as set forth below:

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 

49, 58, and 59, or In the Alternative, Renewed Motion for Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 50(b) is 

set for July 22, 2010 (“Defendant’s Motion”), and in accordance with Local Rule 230, Plaintiff’s 

brief in opposition to Defendant’s Motion is due on July 8, 2010, and Sutter County’s Reply is 

due on July 15, 2010;

WHEREAS, the parties are exploring settlement options, which – if a settlement 

were reached – would obviate the need for further briefing or the court to hear the pending 

motion on July 22. In order to explore settlement options, Plaintiff’s counsel requested whether 

defense counsel would agree to move the motion hearing and the due dates for the responsive 

briefing by one week, and defense counsel has agreed; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel understands that the Court is permitting parties to 

notice motion hearings on July 29, 2010;

NOW THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, the parties STIPULATE as 

follows:

i. The hearing on Defendant’s Motion be moved from July 22, 2010 to July 29, 

2010; 

ii. Plaintiff’s brief in opposition to Defendant’s Motion will be due on July 15, 

2010 from July 8, 2010;

iii. Defendant’s reply brief in support of Defendant’s Motion will be due on July 

22, 2010, from July 15, 2010;

//

//

//

//

Case 2:07-cv-01380-GGH Document 162 Filed 07/06/10 Page 2 of 3
AT T ORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRA NCI SCO 2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

To Continue Hearing Date

No. CIV 07-1380 FCD GGH PC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 2, 2010 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

By /s/ Brendan A. McShane

Brendan A. McShane

Attorneys for Plaintiff RYAN A. BARNES

Dated: July 2, 2010 PORTER SCOTT, A Professional Corporation

By /s/ John R. Whitefleet

John R. Whitefleet

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF 

SUTTER, OFFICER WILLY MITCHELL, 

OFFICER J. RUONA 

ORDER

Having reviewed the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS 

SO ORDERED.

July, 6, 2010

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows______________

Magistrate Gregory G. Hollows, Magistrate of 

the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of California

Barnes1380.ord

Case 2:07-cv-01380-GGH Document 162 Filed 07/06/10 Page 3 of 3