Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-3_06-cv-00471/USCOURTS-almd-3_06-cv-00471-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

 Plaintiff is entitled to amend once as a matter of right before a responsive pleading is served. Fed.

R. Civ. P. 15(a). Plaintiff also seeks an order that the complaint dates back to the date of filing of the original

complaint, establishing new dates for service and answers, and establishing new scheduling order deadlines.

The court does not reach the issue of whether the complaint relates back to the date of filing of the original

complaint. Additionally, the court will not set dates for service or answers, as these matters are governed by

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court will enter a new scheduling order if it later determines that

one is necessary; this action is presently governed by the existing order. 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ROSIE CLIATT, as Personal )

Representative of the )

Estate of DONTAVIUS CLIATT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv471-SRW

) (WO)

PHENIX CITY, ALABAMA, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint (Doc. # 32), it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED to the extent that plaintiff may file the

proposed amendment.1

DONE, this 5th day of December, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00471-MEF-SRW Document 34 Filed 12/05/06 Page 1 of 1