Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02273/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02273-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROSELYN HENSLEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

GRUPE COMMERCIAL COMPANY,

OAKRIDGE CENTER, TICH LUU 

NGUYEN dba TOMMY’S CAFÉ, and 

DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-02273-GEB-AC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND 

CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL 

SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE; FED. R. 

CIV. P. 4(M) NOTICE

The September 30, 2014 Order Setting Status (Pretrial 

Scheduling) Conference scheduled a status conference in this case 

on January 26, 2015, and required the parties to file a joint 

status report no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the 

scheduling conference. The September 30, 2014 Order further 

required a status report be filed regardless of whether a joint 

report could be procured. No status report was filed as ordered.

Therefore, Plaintiff is Ordered to Show Cause (“OSC”) 

in a writing to be filed no later than January 30, 2015, why 

sanctions should not be imposed against her and/or her counsel 

under Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for 

failure to file a timely status report. The written response 

shall also state whether Plaintiff or her counsel is at fault, 

Case 2:14-cv-02273-GEB-AC Document 5 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and whether a hearing is requested on the OSC.1 If a hearing is 

requested, it will be held on March 9, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., just 

prior to the status conference, which is rescheduled to that date 

and time. A joint status report shall be filed no later than 

fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference. 

Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendants

Grupe Commercial Company and Oakridge Center within the 120 day 

period prescribed in that Rule may result in the unserved 

defendant(s) being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on or before 

January 30, 2015, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for these 

defendants or a sufficient explanation why service was not 

completed within Rule 4(m)’s prescribed service period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2015

 

1 “If the fault lies with the attorney, that is where the impact of 

sanction should be lodged. If the fault lies with the clients, that is where 

the impact of the sanction should be lodged.” In re Sanction of Baker, 744 

F.2d 1438, 1442 (10th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1014 (1985). 

Sometimes the faults of attorneys, and their consequences, are visited upon 

clients. Myers v. Shekter (In re Hill), 775 F.2d 1385, 1387 (9th Cir. 1985).

Case 2:14-cv-02273-GEB-AC Document 5 Filed 01/22/15 Page 2 of 2