Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01402/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01402-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07cv1402-JLS (BLM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYMANTEC CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

GLOBE 2000 CORP., et al.,

Defendants. 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 07cv1402-JLS (BLM)

ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION AND

CONVERTING EARLY NEUTRAL

EVALUATION CONFERENCE TO

TELEPHONIC, ATTORNEYS-ONLY

CONFERENCE

[Doc. No. 11]

On October 10, 2007, the parties submitted a joint motion to

continue the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference (ENE) due to

Plaintiff’s counsel’s busy trial schedule. Doc. No. 11. The Court

finds it appropriate to DENY the joint motion and instead convert the

ENE to a telephonic, attorneys-only conference to be held on the same

day as previously scheduled. Accordingly, the telephonic, attorneysonly ENE shall be held on October 17, 2007 at 1:30 p.m. The Court will

initiate the call. Failure to participate may result in the imposition

of sanctions.

As set forth in the Court’s previous order, confidential ENE

statements are required. No later than five (5) court days prior to the

ENE, the parties shall submit confidential statements no more than ten

Case 3:07-cv-01402-JLS-BLM Document 12 Filed 10/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The parties shall not append attachments or exhibits to the ENE statement.

-2- 07cv1402-JLS (BLM)

(10) pages1 in length directly to the chambers of the Honorable Barbara

L. Major. These confidential statements shall not be filed or served

on opposing counsel. Each party's confidential statement must include

the following:

a. A brief description of the case, the claims and/or

counterclaims asserted, and the applicable defenses or position

regarding the asserted claims;

b. A specific and current demand or offer for settlement

addressing all relief or remedies sought. If a specific demand or offer

for settlement cannot be made at the time the brief is submitted, then

the reasons therefore must be stated along with a statement as to when

the party will be in a position to state a demand or make an offer; and

c. A brief description of any previous settlement negotiations,

mediation sessions, or mediation efforts.

General statements that a party will "negotiate in good faith" is

not a specific demand or offer contemplated by this Order. It is

assumed that all parties will negotiate in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 11, 2007

BARBARA L. MAJOR

United States Magistrate Judge

COPY TO:

HONORABLE JANIS L. SAMMARTINO

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ALL COUNSEL

Case 3:07-cv-01402-JLS-BLM Document 12 Filed 10/11/07 Page 2 of 2