Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01931/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01931-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOBBY C. RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

BENICIA POLICE DEP’T, ET AL,

Defendants.

No. 2:12-cv-1931 GEB AC PS

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On April 11, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 11, 2014, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant’s January 10, 2014 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 36) is granted;

3. All claims against the Benicia Police Department are dismissed without leave to amend 

Case 2:12-cv-01931-GEB-AC Document 44 Filed 05/20/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and this defendant is dismissed entirely from this action;

4. Plaintiff’s state law claims are dismissed without leave to amend as to all defendants; 

and 

5. Plaintiff is allowed to proceed only as to his Fourth Amendment claims against the 

officers in their individual capacities. 

Dated: May 19, 2014

Case 2:12-cv-01931-GEB-AC Document 44 Filed 05/20/14 Page 2 of 2