Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05124/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05124-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC HACKETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

SCHWARZENEGGER, et al, ) 

 )

Defendants. )

)

 )

CV F 04-5124 OWW SMS 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION

(DOC. 16)

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis, is proceeding with a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304.

On June 20, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and a

recommendation that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint

without leave to amend because it failed to state a claim.

Plaintiff was granted thirty days within which to file

objections. The findings and recommendation were served on all

parties on June 20, 2005.

On July 12, 2005, Plaintiff filed timely objections to the

Case 1:04-cv-05124-OWW -SMS Document 19 Filed 08/04/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

findings and recommendations. The undersigned has considered the

objections and has determined there is no need to modify the

findings and recommendations based on the points raised in the

objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the findings and recommendation are

supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 20, 2005, are

ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The action IS DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted; and

3. The Clerk of Court IS DIRECTED to close this action

because this order terminates the action in its entirety.IT IS SO

ORDERED.

Emm0d6Dated: August 1, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05124-OWW -SMS Document 19 Filed 08/04/05 Page 2 of 2