Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02786/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02786-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 In the document petitioner states that he wants to return to the superior court, and he

asks for dismissal of this action and an order requiring that he receive access to the prison law

library on days that he is not receiving dialysis treatment. For the reasons set forth in the

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, this action must be dismissed. The court will

not, therefore, make any orders concerning petitioner’s access to the prison law library.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARENGA BROWN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-2786 LKK JFM P

vs.

JAMES TILTON, Secretary,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 25, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner

has filed a document styled as filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1

Case 2:07-cv-02786-LKK -JFM Document 7 Filed 02/26/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 25, 2008, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: February 25, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02786-LKK -JFM Document 7 Filed 02/26/08 Page 2 of 2