Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00703/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00703-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1365 Environmental Matters

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jordan S. Stanzler (SBN 54620)

Jeffrey M. Curtiss (SBN 239199)

STANZLER LAW GROUP LLC

2275 E. Bayshore Rd., Suite 100

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 739-0200

Facsimile: (650) 739-0916

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Hinds Investments, L.P. and 

Patricia MacLaughlin as Trustee of the Thomas F. Hinds and

Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P. and PATRICIA

MACLAUGHLIN as TRUSTEE of the

THOMAS F. HINDS and MARY JANE HINDS

LIVING TRUST, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

 

TEAM ENTERPRISES, INC., MULTIMATIC

CORPORATION, MULTIMATIC DRY

CLEANING MACHINE CORPORATION,

MULTIMATIC LLC, KIRRBERG

CORPORATION, HOYT CORPORATION,

RR STREET & CO., INC.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________

AND RELATED ACTIONS.

_______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:07-CV-00703-LJO-GSA

STIPULATION FOR

CONTINUANCE OF TIME TO

FILE OPPOSITION TO RR

STREET & CO., INC.’S MOTION

TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

(JOINED BY MULTIMATIC LLC

AND THE KIRRBERG

CORPORATION)

Date: January 21, 2010

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Courtroom: 4

ACTION FILED: May 10, 2007

TRIAL DATE: Not Set

WHEREAS the defendant RR Street & Co. Inc. (“RR Street”) filed a motion to dismiss

the plaintiffs Hinds Investments, L.P. and Patricia MacLaughlin as Trustee of the Thomas F.

Hinds and Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust’s (“Hinds Investments”) first amended complaint on

December 21, 2009, identified as Document 54 on the Court’s docket;

WHEREAS the defendants Multimatic LLC (“Multimatic”) and The Kirrberg

Corporation (“Kirrberg”) joined in the motion to dismiss on January 4, 2010; 

1

STIPULATION/ORDER.

Case 1:07-cv-00703-LJO -GSA Document 63 Filed 01/06/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS Local Rule 230(e) provides that the Court may continue the hearing date of

the motion to dismiss and any joinders to that motion so that the responding party may

adequately address all issues presented in the motions;

WHEREAS Hinds Investments’ opposition brief to the motion is due on or before

January 7, 2010;

WHEREAS the parties wish to extend the deadline for Hinds Investments to file an

opposition brief in order to address all pending motions to dismiss and request a continuance of

the hearing date; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between RR Street, Multimatic, Kirrberg and

Hinds Investments that the plaintiffs’ deadline for filing an opposition brief to the defendants’

motion to dismiss will be continued to January 21, 2010; the defendants’ deadline for filing a

reply brief will be continued to February 9, 2010; and the hearing date will be continued to

February 16, 2010 to coincide with the currently scheduled status conference.

Dated: January __, 2010 STANZLER LAW GROUP LLC

By:_______________________________________

Jordan S. Stanzler

Jeffrey M. Curtiss

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Hinds Investments, L.P. and

Patricia MacLaughlin as Trustee of the Thomas F.

Hinds and Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust

Dated: January __, 2010 HICKS THOMAS LLP

By:__________________________

Eric Grant

Paula Whitten

Attorneys for Defendant RR Street & Co., Inc.

2

STIPULATION/ORDER.

Case 1:07-cv-00703-LJO -GSA Document 63 Filed 01/06/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: January __, 2010 DONGELL LAWRENCE FINNEY LLP

By.__________________________

Richard A. Dongell

Thomas F. Vandenburg

Ian P. Culver

Attorneys for Multimatic LLC and The Kirrberg

Corporation

ORDER

This GRANTS the extension to file opposition and reply papers. This Court’s practice is

to rule on motions on the record without oral argument. This Court does not grant F.R.Civ.P.

12(b)(6) relief to a defendant joining in a pending motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3

STIPULATION/ORDER.

Case 1:07-cv-00703-LJO -GSA Document 63 Filed 01/06/10 Page 3 of 3