Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02146/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02146-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN EDWARD NESBITT,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-07-2146 LKK GGH PS

vs.

GERALDINE AGONCILLO NESBITT,

MIRIAM AGONCILLO BRAVO,

Defendant. ORDER

__________________________________/

On December 11, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:07-cv-02146-LKK -GGH Document 4 Filed 01/29/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed December 11, 2007, are

ADOPTED; and

2. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6), and 41(b).

DATED: January 28, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02146-LKK -GGH Document 4 Filed 01/29/08 Page 2 of 2