Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04486/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04486-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

STIPULATION EXTENDING ATTM’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. C 07-04486 SBA

44045622

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DONALD M. FALK (SBN 150256)

dfalk@mayerbrown.com

RENA CHNG (SBN 209665)

rchng@mayerbrown.com

MAYER BROWN, LLP

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300

3000 El Camino Real

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112

Telephone: (650) 331-2000

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060

- and –

VICTORIA R. COLLADO (pro hac vice)

vcollado@mayerbrown.com

SARAH E. REYNOLDS (pro hac vice)

sreyholds@mayerbrown.com

MAYER BROWN LLP

71 South Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60606

Telephone: (312) 701-0700

Facsimile: (312) 701-7711

Attorneys for Defendant

AT&T MOBILITY LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

ZOLTAN STIENER and YNEZ STIENER,

individually and on behalf of all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

APPLE COMPUTER, INC., AT&T

MOBILITY, LLC, and DOES 1 through 50,

inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. C 07-04486 SBA

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR

AT&T MOBILITY LLC TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

THEREON

Case 4:07-cv-04486-SBA Document 62 Filed 03/20/2008 Page 1 of 2

XXXXXXXX

Case 4:07-cv-04486-SBA Document 68 Filed 03/26/08 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION EXTENDING ATTM’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. C 07-04486 SBA

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs Zoltan and Ynez Steiner (“Plaintiffs”) and defendant AT&T Mobility LLC

(“ATTM”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the current deadline for ATTM to respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint is March

26, 2008; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs agree to extend this deadline to April 22, 2008;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record,

stipulate that ATTM may file its response to Plaintiffs’ complaint by April 22, 2008.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 21, 2008 Folkenflik & McGerity

By: /s/ Max Folkenflik

Max Folkenflik

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Zoltan and Ynez Stiener

Dated: March 21, 2008 Mayer Brown LLP

By: /s/ Rena Chng

Rena Chng

Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, I, Rena Chng, attest that I obtained

concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. ATTM’s response to

Plaintiffs’ complaint is due on or before April 22, 2008.

Date: _______________________ ____________________________

Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong

United States District Judge

Case 4:07-cv-04486-SBA Document 62 Filed 03/20/2008 Page 2 of 2

XXXXXXXXX 3/26/08

Case 4:07-cv-04486-SBA Document 68 Filed 03/26/08 Page 2 of 2