Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06114/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06114-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on 1

plaintiff on April 28, 2006, as undeliverable. However, plaintiff has not

notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON PATTEN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EDWARD ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06114-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 18)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

(Doc. 16)

Plaintiff Jason Patten (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se

and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On April 17, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that an objection to the Findings

and Recommendations, if any, was to be filed within twenty days. 

To date, plaintiff has not filed an objection.1

Case 1:04-cv-06114-OWW -SMS Document 20 Filed 05/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

at a party’s prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 83-182(f). 

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 17, 2006,

is ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on plaintiff’s failure

to obey the court’s order of March 1, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06114-OWW -SMS Document 20 Filed 05/25/06 Page 2 of 2