Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02274/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02274-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANA LUISA SALINAS DE VALLE )

et al., individually, and )

acting in the interest of other ) 

current and former employees, )

) 2:06-cv-2274-GEB-DAD

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

SIERRA CASCADE, INC., a California )

corporation, and DOES ONE through )

TWENTY, inclusive, )

)

Defendants. )

 )

Defendant moves to strike Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief, correctly

observing that it was filed two days late. Under Local Rule 78-

230(d), Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief was due Monday, December 4, 2006, but

was only filed Wednesday, December 6, 2006. Nevertheless, the Reply

Brief will not be stricken. However, Plaintiffs’ failure to timely

file their Reply Brief throws the prescribed briefing schedule out of

whack, and could subject Defendant to undue pressure if the hearing

date remains scheduled for Monday, December 11, 2006. Therefore, the

hearing is vacated and will only be rescheduled should Defendant file

Case 2:06-cv-02274-GEB-DAD Document 54 Filed 12/07/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a written request for a hearing within five court days of the date on

which this Order is filed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 7, 2006

 

 

 

 

Case 2:06-cv-02274-GEB-DAD Document 54 Filed 12/07/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case 2:06-cv-02274-GEB-DAD Document 54 Filed 12/07/06 Page 3 of 3