Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-01219/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-01219-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL F. DUNN,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 13CV1219-MMA (RBB)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE;

[Doc. No. 18]

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT;

[Doc. No. 13]

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

CROSS MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Doc. No. 14] 

vs.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

On May 22, 2013, Plaintiff Paul F. Dunn filed this appeal pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of an adverse final decision of the Commissioner of

Social Security regarding his claim for disability insurance benefits and

Supplemental Security Income benefits. The matter was referred to the Honorable

Ruben B. Brooks, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) and Civil Local Rule 72.1. On April 9, 2014, Judge Brooks issued a

thorough and well-reasoned Report containing findings and conclusions, upon which

- 1 - 13cv1219

Case 3:13-cv-01219-MMA-RBB Document 19 Filed 05/23/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

he bases his recommendation that the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion for summary

judgment and grant Defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment.

Neither party objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for

filing objections has expired. 

The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties as well

as the administrative record, and has made a review and determination in accordance

with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law. Accordingly,

1. The Court ADOPTS Judge Brooks’ Report and Recommendation [Doc.

No. 18] in its entirety; 

2. The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc.

No. 13]; and,

3. The Court GRANTS Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary

Judgment [Doc. No. 14].

The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 23, 2014

Hon. Michael M. Anello

United States District Judge

- 2 - 13cv1219

Case 3:13-cv-01219-MMA-RBB Document 19 Filed 05/23/14 Page 2 of 2