Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00815/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00815-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SID LANDAU,

Plaintiff,

v.

W. T. VOSS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00815-AWI-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

DEFENDANTS ROBERTO MORISHO AND

W.T. VOSS FROM ACTION

(DOC. 107)

Plaintiff Sid Landau (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 19, 2010, the United States Marshal, who must effect

service of process on behalf of plaintiffs proceeding in forma pauperis, returned a summons for

Defendant W. T. Voss unexecuted. Doc. 70. On August 12, 2010, the United States Marshal

returned a summons for Defendant Roberto Morisho unexecuted. Doc. 73.The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 14, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within fourteen days. Doc. 107. No party filed a timely

Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

1

Case 1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB Document 109 Filed 02/10/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 14, 2011, is adopted in full;

and

2. Defendants Roberto Morisho and W.T. Voss are dismissed from this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 10, 2012 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2

Case 1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB Document 109 Filed 02/10/12 Page 2 of 2