Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_08-cv-08116/USCOURTS-azd-3_08-cv-08116-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Edward Harry Gum, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

 Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-8116-PCT-MHM

ORDER

Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

on September 24, 2008. On December 11, 2008, Respondents filed their response to

Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. On September 18, 2009, the Magistrate

Judge issued his Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied and

dismissed with prejudice. 

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Failure to timely file objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge

/ / / 

Case 3:08-cv-08116-MHM Document 20 Filed 11/05/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

may be considered a waiver of a party’s right to de novo consideration of the issues. See

United States v. Reyna-Tapia 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

After a complete and independent review of the issues presented, the Court finds itself

in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court [doc. 19]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied

and dismissed with prejudice [doc. 1]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 2nd day of November, 2009.

Case 3:08-cv-08116-MHM Document 20 Filed 11/05/09 Page 2 of 2