Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01242/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01242-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:185 Employee Pension Plan

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEW UNITED MOTOR

MANUFACTURING, INC.,

 Movant/Petitioner,

v.

UNITED AUTO WORKERS LOCAL

2244,

 Respondent.

 NO. C 08-0976 TEH

 NO. C 08-1242 TEH 

 ORDER DENYING 

 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

 TO CONSOLIDATE 

 HEARINGS AND 

 VACATING AND SETTING

 HEARING DATES IN 

 RELATED CASES

 

UNITED AUTO WORKERS LOCAL

2244, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

NEW UNITED MOTOR

MANUFACTURING, INC.

 Defendant.

 

The Court has reviewed UAW’s Administrative Motion to Consolidate Hearings In

Related Cases in this matter, as well as related arguments made by both parties in other

filings on the pending motions. Good cause appearing therefore:

The Administrative Motion is hereby DENIED. Hearing on UAW’s Motion for

Summary Judgment for Denial or Continuance Under Rule 56(f) in Case No. C-08-1242 is

hereby VACATED. Hearing on NUMMI’s Motion to Vacate Labor Arbitration Award is

Case 3:08-cv-01242-TEH Document 25 Filed 04/29/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

hereby set for Monday, June 2, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 12. NUMMI’s Reply in support

of its Motion to Vacate shall be filed no later than May 12, 2008.

Together with the hearing on the motion, the Court will hold a case management

conference in both cases. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference

Statement by Friday, May 23, 2008, which, in addition to conforming with the applicable

requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and

Standing Orders, briefly discusses the parties’ respective positions on how the litigation

should proceed 1) if the Court grants the Motion to Vacate; and 2) if the Court denies the

Motion to Vacate. The parties shall meet and confer about each topic to be included in the

Joint Case Management Statement no later than May 19, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 4/29/08 

 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:08-cv-01242-TEH Document 25 Filed 04/29/08 Page 2 of 2