Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02411/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02411-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

JOE ALONZO SERNA, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIV 05-02411 PHX EHC MEA

)

JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

) FOR DISMISSAL

 Defendant. ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE

_______________________________)

Plaintiff filed his complaint on August 11, 2005. On

January 11, 2006, the Court ordered Plaintiff to complete and

return a service packet for Defendant to the Court by January

31, 2006. That order warned Plaintiff that his failure to

timely comply with the provisions of the order would result in

the dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not returned a service

packet to the Court for Defendant. 

Plaintiff was warned that his failure to acquire a

waiver of service from Defendant or to complete service of

process on Defendant within 60 days of the date that the service

order was issued, by March 13, 2006, would result in the

dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m), Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure, and Rule 16.2(b)(2)(B), of the United States

District Court for the District of Arizona Local Rules of Civil

Case 2:05-cv-02411-EHC Document 8 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

Procedure. The civil docket in this matter indicates that

Plaintiff has failed to acquire a waiver of service from

Defendant or to complete service of process on Defendant.

On March 14, 2006, the Court gave Plaintiff until

April 21, 2006, to show cause why this case should not be

dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s

order of January 11, 2006, and Plaintiff’s failure to effect

service of process on Defendant as required by the Court’s order

of January 11, 2006, and Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. Plaintiff has failed to show cause for his failure

to abide by the Court’s orders and to effect service of process

on Defendant. 

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this case be

dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to serve the Defendant in this

matter and for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s

order of January 11, 2006.

DATED this 11th day of May, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02411-EHC Document 8 Filed 05/15/06 Page 2 of 2