Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00341/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00341-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK C. FAUROT, II

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0341 LKK KJM P

vs.

TERHUNE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On December 27, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order filed December 8, 2005 dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with leave to

amend. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that

it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed December 8,

2005, is affirmed;

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00341-LKK -KJM Document 12 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file an amended

complaint as directed by the magistrate judge on December 8, 2005. 

DATED: September 11, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-00341-LKK -KJM Document 12 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2