Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03968/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03968-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The instant action was reassigned to the undersigned on September 21, 2007.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HASSAN GOLCHINI,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SARAH A. LINDAUER, et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-07-3968 MMC

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT;

DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DENYING

MOTION TO EXPEDITE 

Before the Court is plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, complaint,

and “Motion to Expedite for Emergency,” each of which was filed July 27, 2007.1

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), where a plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma

pauperis, the Court must dismiss the complaint if the Court determines the complaint is

frivolous or malicious, or that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be

granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii).

Here, plaintiff’s complaint falls directly within the category of pleadings identified in

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Plaintiff describes the complaint as “rais[ing] the question before

the Court [as] to whether or not we have reached a time in this era to have our San

Francisco society free of underground sex club and sex slavery and sex trafficking, sperm

count.” (See Compl. at 7.) Plaintiff names as defendants two “private citizens,” one of

Case 3:07-cv-03968-MMC Document 9 Filed 09/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

whom is alleged to be “an agent to an Asian secret society and/or a group of Anarchists,

and [who] associates with a group of Iranian [sic] from the members of ‘New Mujahedeen,”

while the other is alleged to be the “coach” of the first defendant. (See Compl. at 3.) 

Plaintiff alleges defendants “are a menace to society and a bad seed waiting for an

opportunity to suck the blood of the good and decent people.” (See Compl. at 7.) Similar

allegations are made throughout the complaint.

Plaintiff fails to state a claim falling within the jurisdiction of a district court, and there

is no indication plaintiff can cure the deficiencies in the complaint.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is hereby DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B), and plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and “Motion to

Expedite for Emergency” are hereby DENIED as moot.

The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-03968-MMC Document 9 Filed 09/26/07 Page 2 of 2