Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_10-cv-08105/USCOURTS-azd-3_10-cv-08105-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Ronald Cooke, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Town of Colorado City, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-10-08105-PCT-JAT

ORDER 

 The Court has considered the parties’ post-verdict memoranda and briefing (Docs. 

595, 596, 603, 604) and orders as follows: 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file, on or before May 16, 2014, a proposed 

form of judgment. Plaintiffs must include in their proposed form of judgment all relief 

requested in this case (including relief related to the jury’s verdicts), as the Court will 

deem any relief not so included to be waived. The proposed form of judgment must be in 

the form of separately numbered paragraphs with no more than one finding, conclusion, 

or order per paragraph. Plaintiffs shall not include any arguments or citations to 

authorities in their proposed form of judgment. Any briefing or memoranda containing 

arguments must be limited to the reply. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file, on or before May 26, 

2014, a response to Plaintiffs’ proposed form of judgment. Defendants’ response must 

contain separately numbered paragraphs corresponding to the numbered paragraphs in 

Plaintiffs’ proposed form of judgment. Defendants shall, in each numbered paragraph, 

state whether they agree with or object to the corresponding paragraph in Plaintiffs’ 

Case 3:10-cv-08105-JAT Document 643 Filed 05/06/14 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

proposed form of judgment. For each objection, Defendants may succinctly state the 

basis for their objection, which may include points of authorities and argument. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may file, within ten days after the 

filing of Defendants’ response, a reply to Defendants’ response containing such points of 

authorities and argument as they deem necessary. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there will be no hearing on the proposed form 

of judgment unless as the Court may order on its own motion at a later date. 

 Dated this 6th day of May, 2014. 

Case 3:10-cv-08105-JAT Document 643 Filed 05/06/14 Page 2 of 2