Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02774/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02774-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. and Order Continuing Case Mgmt. Conf. – 

Case No. 07-CV-02774 JF (RS) 1

Robert A. Spanner, Esq. (State Bar No. 60308)

TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

545 Middlefield Road, Suite 220

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 324-2223

Facsimile: (650) 324-0178

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.,

Defendants. ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 07-CV-02774 JF (RS)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

TO THE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES, AND TO THE PARTIES’ ATTORNEYS

OF RECORD: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, IP

SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK

OF AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONS, INC. (“Defendants”) that the Case

Management Conference be continued for one month from its presently-scheduled date of

January 25, 2008, up to and until February 29, 2008, or to a later date that is convenient for

the Court. 

**E-filed 1/17/08** ---------------

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 29 Filed 01/17/08 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. and Order Continuing Case Mgmt. Conf. – 

Case No. 07-CV-02774 JF (RS) 2

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between

Plaintiff and Defendants that, pursuant to this Stipulation continuing the Case Management

Conference that this Stipulation is requested for good cause, in that representatives of

Plaintiff IP Solutions and Bank of America have conferred directly regarding settlement of

this action, and Plaintiff is submitting comprehensive terms for a settlement on January 11,

2008. 

The following time modifications have been made in this case:

– the parties previously stipulated that Defendants be granted an additional fifteen

(15) days in which to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to July 27, 2007;

– the parties further stipulated that Defendants be granted an additional four (4)

days in which to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to July 31, 2007;

– the parties stipulated that the original case management conference be continued

for two months, from its originally-scheduled date of August 29, 2007. The Court issued

an Order granting that continuance on August 27, 2007;

– the parties stipulated that the initial case management conference be continued for

one month, and the Court granted that continuance on October 3, 2007, scheduling the case

management conference for October 26, 2007. The Court then issued a Clerk’s Notice

rescheduling the conference for December 7, 2007;

– the parties stipulated to continue their Rule 26(f) conference, up to December 21,

2007. On December 4, 2007, the Court issued an order granting that Stipulation and

continuing the case management conference to January 25, 2008.

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 29 Filed 01/17/08 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. and Order Continuing Case Mgmt. Conf. – 

Case No. 07-CV-02774 JF (RS) 3

Because the parties filed their Joint Case Management Statement on November 30,

2007, granting this Stipulation and Order to continue the case management conference will

have no other effect on the schedule for this case.

By entering into this stipulation, neither Plaintiff nor Defendants waive any rights,

claims or defenses they may have in this action. This Stipulation may be executed in

counterparts and by facsimile signature, each of which, when executed, shall be an original

and all of which together shall constitute one and the same stipulation. This Stipulation

contains the entire agreement among the parties. The undersigned hereby consent to the

terms set forth in the foregoing Stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 

Dated: ________________ TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.

By: _____________________________________

Robert A. Spanner

Dated: ________________ FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK OF 

AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONS,

INC.

By: _____________________________________

Christina D. Jordan

1/9/2008 /s/ Robert A. Spanner 1/9/2008 /s/ Christina D. Jordan

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 29 Filed 01/17/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 _______________________________________

Stip. and Order Continuing Case Mgmt. Conf. – 

Case No. 07-CV-02774 JF (RS) 4

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from

Christina D. Jordan. 

Dated: ________________ TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.

By: _____________________________________

Robert A. Spanner

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ __________________________________________

HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL JUDGE OF THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1/17/08 1/9/2008 /s/ Robert A. Spanner

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 29 Filed 01/17/08 Page 4 of 4