Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00167/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00167-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:402 Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

ISAAC EVANS

Plaintiff, 

vs.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

the Social Security Administration, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 06-167-TUC-CKJ

ORDER

On August 28, 2007, United States Magistrate Judge Hector C. Estrada issued his

Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [Doc. #22]. Neither party objected within ten days

of that order as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 

In conclusion, the Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and finds Magistrate Judge

Estrada’s analysis well-reasoned with no clear error. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ.

P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v.

Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 22) is ADOPTED;

(2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 15) is DENIED;

Case 4:06-cv-00167-CKJ Document 23 Filed 09/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

(3) Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 18) is DENIED;

and

(4) The case is REMANDED to the Administrative Law Judge for further

proceedings consistent with the R&R.

DATED this 28th day of September, 2007. 

Case 4:06-cv-00167-CKJ Document 23 Filed 09/28/07 Page 2 of 2