Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01094/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01094-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1094

SUKCHA THARP,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General; UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Drug Enforcement Agency,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:15-cv-00719-GBL-MSN)

Submitted: September 15, 2016 Decided: October 5, 2016 

Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard F. Hawkins, III, HAWKINS LAW FIRM, PC, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States 

Attorney, Andrew S. Han, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1094 Doc: 36 Filed: 10/05/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Sukcha Tharp appeals the district court’s order granting 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for 

summary judgment, on Tharp’s discrimination, harassment and 

retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil 

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 

(2012), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 

U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2016). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s judgment. Tharp v. Lynch, No. 

1:15-cv-00719-GBL-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 2015). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1094 Doc: 36 Filed: 10/05/2016 Pg: 2 of 2