Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03125/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03125-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING SCHEDULE 

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

ALFRED C. PFEIFFER, JR. (SBN 120965) 

RANDY MICHELSON (SBN 114095) 

KRISTEN A. PALUMBO (SBN 215857) 

BREE HANN (SBN 215695) 

RACHEL H. SOMMOVILLA (SBN 231529) 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, California 94111-4067 

Telephone: (415) 393-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 

Attorneys for Defendants 

INDIVOS CORPORATION and 

SOLIDUS NETWORKS, INC. 

BORNSTEIN & BORNSTEIN 

JONATHAN H. BORNSTEIN 

507 Polk Street, Suite 320 

San Francisco, California 94102 

Telephone: (415) 409-7611 

Facsimile: (415) 409-9345 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

EXCEL INNOVATIONS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

EXCEL INNOVATIONS, INC.,

 Plaintiff, 

 v.

INDIVOS CORPORATION, SOLIDUS 

NETWORKS, INC., and DOES 1 TO 100, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. C-03-3125 MMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RESETTING SCHEDULE RE PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR DE NOVO

DETERMINATION RE OBJECTIONS TO 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

INDIVOS CORPORATION and SOLIDUS 

NETWORKS, INC., 

Counterclaimants/ 

Counterdefendants,

v.

EXCEL INNOVATIONS, INC., NED 

HOFFMAN, and AVIV LLC, 

Counterdefendants/

 Counterclaimants. 

Case 3:03-cv-03125-MMC Document 420 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING SCHEDULE 

Plaintiff Excel Innovations, Inc. and Defendants Indivos Corporation and Solidus Networks, 

Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) submit the following stipulation and proposed order resetting the 

schedule on Plaintiff’s Motion for De Novo Determination of Objections to Report and 

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge (the “Motion”), filed on December 6, 2006 and currently set to 

be heard on January 12, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. 

The parties stipulate as follows: 

1. The hearing date for the Motion will be reset to January 19, 2007 at 9:00 a.m.; 

2. Defendants’ opposition to the Motion will accordingly be due December 29, 2006; and 

3. Plaintiff’s reply to the Motion will accordingly be due January 5, 2007.

SO STIPULATED: 

DATED: December 8, 2006 

Bornstein & Bornstein 

/s/

Jonathan H. Bornstein 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DATED: December 8, 2006 Bingham McCutchen LLP 

/s/

Alfred C. Pfeiffer, Jr. 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: December 8, 2006

Maxine M. Chesney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-03125-MMC Document 420 Filed 12/08/06 Page 2 of 2