Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00846/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00846-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage

---

1 

Stipulation to Continue Motion to Dismiss Complaint; Order Thereon 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Damrell 

Nelson 

Schrimp 

Pallios 

Pacher & 

Silva

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION

BRITZ FERTILIZERS, INC., a California 

Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

BAYER CORPORATION, an Indiana 

Corporation, and BAYER CROPSCIENCE, 

LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 1:07-CV-00846-OWW-SMS 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 

MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT; 

ORDER THEREON 

Date: October 15, 2007 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Ctrm: Three 

(Please note date change) 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto that Plaintiff Britz 

Fertilizers, Inc. and Defendants Bayer Corporation and Bayer CropScience, L.P., through their 

respective undersigned attorneys, that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint currently set to be 

heard on October 15, 2007 be continued to November 19, 2007. 

Roger M. Schrimp, State Bar No. 039378 

George P. Rodarakis, State Bar No. 222214 

Eric J. Sousa, State Bar No. 232541 

DAMRELL, NELSON, SCHRIMP, 

 PALLIOS, PACHER & SILVA 

1601 I Street, 5th Floor 

Modesto, CA 95354 

Telephone (209) 526-3500 

Facsimile (209) 526-3534 

Ted R. Frame, State Bar No. 023736 

FRAME & MATSUMOTO 

201 Washington Street 

Post Office Box 895 

Coalinga, CA 93210 

Tel: (559) 935-1552 

Fax: (559) 935-1555 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 Britz Fertilizers, Inc. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00846-OWW -SMS Document 31 Filed 10/05/07 Page 1 of 2
2 

Stipulation to Continue Motion to Dismiss Complaint; Order Thereon 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Damrell 

Nelson 

Schrimp 

Pallios 

Pacher & 

Silva

Said Stipulation is made in the interest of justice in that Roger M. Schrimp, attorney for 

Plaintiff, has a scheduling conflict with the date currently set, October 15, 2007. 

 DAMRELL, NELSON, SCHRMIP 

 PALLIOS, PACHER & SILVA 

Dated: September 26, 2007 By___________/s/____________ 

 Roger M. Schrimp 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 CLIFFORD & BROWN 

Dated: September 28, 2007 By___________/s/___________ 

 Stephen T. Clifford 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

O R D E R

A stipulation having been entered into by the respective parties for a continuance of 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the date of October 15, 2007, the date currently set for Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss Complaint, is continued to November 19, 2007. 

Dated: October 2, 2007 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER 

 Honorable Oliver W. Wanger 

britz\16536\P\stip-cont 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00846-OWW -SMS Document 31 Filed 10/05/07 Page 2 of 2