Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00896/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00896-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The United States Postal Service returned the order served on Petitioner on October 3, 2005, as undeliverable.

1

A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Out of Custody. However, Petitioner has not notified the court of

any change in address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(d).

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LANSANA JOHN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

ALBERTO GONZALEZ, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:05-cv-00896-OWW-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On September 21, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that this action be DISMISSED based on Petitioner's

failure to obey the court's order of August 8, 2005. These

Findings and Recommendations were served on Petitioner and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty

(30) days from the date of service of that order. To date,

Petitioner has not filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.1

Case 1:05-cv-00896-OWW -SMS Document 8 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 21,

2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on Petitioner's failure to

obey the court's order of August 8, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00896-OWW -SMS Document 8 Filed 11/01/05 Page 2 of 2