Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01242/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01242-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

Trucker 

Ø Huss 

A Professional Corporation 

100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO HOLD A MEDIATION TO 

OCTOBER 21, 2010; Case No. CV 10-01242 JF

1

#1096351 

R. Bradford Huss, No. 71303 

Clarissa A. Kang, No. 210660 

Michelle L. Schuller, No. 255787 

TRUCKER Ø HUSS 

A Professional Corporation 

100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 788-3111 

Facsimile: (415) 421-2017 

E-mail: bhuss@truckerhuss.com

ckang@truckerhuss.com

mschuller@truckerhuss.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION 

and LOCKHEED MARTIN 

CORPORATION SALARIED EMPLOYEE 

RETIREMENT PROGRAM 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANDREW J. NALBANDIAN, JR., an 

individual; GREGORY M. NALBANDIAN, 

an individual; and THE ESTATE OF 

ANDREW J. NALBANDIAN, SR., deceased, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, a 

Maryland corporation, as administrator and 

fiduciary of the Lockheed Martin Corporation 

Salaried Employee Retirement Program; 

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION 

SALARIED EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT 

PROGRAM, an Employee Pension Plan 

within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(2)(a) 

and 1002(35); and DOES 1 through 50, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. CV 10-01242 JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO 

COMPLETE ADR TO OCTOBER 21, 

2010 

Plaintiffs ANDREW J. NALBANDIAN, JR. and GREGORY M. NALBANDIAN and 

Defendants LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and LOCKHEED MARTIN 

CORPORATION SALARIED EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PROGRAM hereby stipulate, by and 

through their respective counsel, to continue to October 21, 2010, the deadline to complete 

mediation of the case through the Court’s ADR Program. The deadline to hold the mediation in the 

------------------

Case 5:10-cv-01242-LHK Document 22 Filed 07/30/10 Page 1 of 3
Trucker 

Ø Huss 

A Professional Corporation 

100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO HOLD A MEDIATION TO 

OCTOBER 21, 2010; Case No. CV 10-01242 JF

2

#1096351 

case is currently September 21, 2010, as set by the Court’s Order Selecting ADR Process (Docket 

#18) (“ADR Order”). The parties request a 30 day continuance of the deadline. 

1. Plaintiffs and Defendants earlier agreed to participate in mediation pursuant to the 

Court’s rules regarding alternative dispute resolution. 

2. Pursuant to the ADR Order, the Court referred the parties to mediation, which was 

to be completed within 90 days from the date of the ADR Order. The current deadline for holding 

the mediation in this case is September 21, 2010. 

3. Counsel for the parties have conferred and agreed to schedule a mediation after the 

Court decides Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Claims Two Through Five of the Complaint and to 

Strike The Estate of Andrew J. Nalbandian, Sr. and Gregory M. Nalbandian as Plaintiffs (Docket 

#8) (“Motion to Dismiss”), which is currently pending before the Court and scheduled to be heard 

on August 27, 2010. The mediator has agreed with the parties’ preferred course of action and has 

scheduled to hold, on September 10, 2010, a pre-mediation phone conference pursuant to ADR 

Local Rule 6-4(a). 

4. In light of the parties’ request and Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss, the 

Court previously continued the case management conference and related case management 

deadlines in an order dated June 23, 2010 (Docket #17). 

5. The parties have discussed possible dates for mediation in this case and are aware 

that there is a narrow period of 11 calendar days (7 business days) between the September 10, 2010 

pre-mediation phone conference and the September 21, 2010 deadline to mediate. Because parties’ 

attendance at mediation will require travel by the parties and/or parties’ representatives, the parties 

believe that additional time to complete mediation would assist the parties and mediator to 

schedule the mediation for a mutually convenient date. 

6. The parties request that the Court continue the deadline to complete mediation 

through the Court’s ADR Program in order to facilitate the ability of the parties and the mediator to 

schedule mediation for a period of time after the pending Motion to Dismiss is decided. The 

parties request that the Court continue the deadline to complete mediation by 30 days, to October 

21, 2010. 

Case 5:10-cv-01242-LHK Document 22 Filed 07/30/10 Page 2 of 3
Trucker 

Ø Huss 

A Professional Corporation 

100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO HOLD A MEDIATION TO 

OCTOBER 21, 2010; Case No. CV 10-01242 JF

3

#1096351 

7. The parties have made two previous modifications to the case through the 

Stipulation re Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint (Docket #5), which extended the 

time to respond to the complaint until May 27, 2010, and the Stipulation and Order Continuing 

Case Management Conference And Related Case Management Deadlines (Docket #17). 

8. The parties’ current request for a continuance of the deadline to complete mediation 

will not alter any other dates or deadlines set by Court order. 

DATED: July 26, 2010 

HERRIG & VOGT, LLP 

By: /s/Gina L. Moyles 

Gina L. Moyles 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 ANDREW J. NALBANDIAN, JR. and 

GREGORY M. NALBANDIAN 

DATED: July 26, 2010 

TRUCKER Ø HUSS 

By: /s/Clarissa A. Kang 

Clarissa A. Kang 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and 

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION 

SALARIED EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT 

PROGRAM 

I attest that I have obtained Ms. Moyles’ concurrence in the filing of this document. 

DATED: July 26, 2010 

/s/Clarissa A. Kang 

Clarissa A. Kang 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ________________, 2010 

 

Honorable Jeremy Fogel, Judge 

United States District Court, District of Northern 

California

7/29

Case 5:10-cv-01242-LHK Document 22 Filed 07/30/10 Page 3 of 3