Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01779/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01779-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRYAN E. RANSOM,

Plaintiff,

vs.

C. McCABE, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:13cv01779 AWI DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(Document 41)

Plaintiff Bryan E. Ransom (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed this action on November 5, 2013.

On February 13, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the majority of state law 

claims for failure to allege compliance with the California Government Claims Act. The matter 

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 

Rule 302.

On September 2, 2015, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations that 

Defendants’ motion be denied without prejudice. The parties were advised that objections were 

to be filed within thirty days of the date of service of this order. No objections have been filed.

///

///

Case 1:13-cv-01779-DAD-GSA Document 42 Filed 10/22/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 

a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 2, 2015, are ADOPTED in 

full; 

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the state law claims is DENIED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE; and 

3. Defendants SHALL file a responsive pleading within fourteen (14) days of the 

date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 22, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01779-DAD-GSA Document 42 Filed 10/22/15 Page 2 of 2