Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00812/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00812-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Francisco Campos Guerrero, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Greg Fizer and Terry Goddard, Attorney

General of the State of Arizona, 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-00812 PHX NVW (MEA)

ORDER

Pending before the court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate

Judge Mark E. Aspey (doc. # 12) regarding Petitioner’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. # 1). The R&R

recommends that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. 

The parties did not file objections to the R&R, which relieves the court of its

obligation to review any of the magistrate judge’s determinations in the R&R. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does 

not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”).

The court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well taken. The court will

accept the R&R and deny the petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district

court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations

made by the magistrate”). 

Case 2:06-cv-00812-NVW Document 13 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Aspey (doc. # 12) is accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. # 1) is denied and

dismissed with prejudice. The clerk is directed to terminate this case.

DATED this 15th day of November 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00812-NVW Document 13 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 2