Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00766/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00766-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

Jerry N. Budin

State Bar #88539

Law Office of Jerry Budin

2401 E. Orangeburg Ave., Ste. 675-309

Modesto, California 95355

Telephone: (209) 544-3030

Facsimile: (209) 544-3144

Attorney for Plaintiff, 

DAVID FUSON, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID FUSON, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly-situated,,

Plaintiff,

v.

C.L. BRYANT, C. BRYANT

TRANSPORT, INC., and DOES 1 through

100,,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CV-F-06-0766 LJO SMS

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO 

AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER; 

ORDER

On March 13, 2007 (See Doc. 16) and then, again, on June 20, 2007 (See Doc. 20), this

Court amended the Scheduling Order in this matter to extend the deadlines for the filing and

hearing of plaintiff’s class certification motion.

Pursuant to the last amendment, the Court set the following schedule:

1. The deadline for plaintiff to file his Motion For Class Certification is July

16, 2007.

2. Defendants’ deadline to file an opposition to the Motion For Class

Certification is July 30, 2007.

3. Plaintiff’s deadline to file a reply, if any, is August 6, 2007.

4. Hearing on plaintiff’s Motion For Class Certification is August 20, 2007.

At the time that plaintiff’s counsel submitted the last stipulation to amend the scheduling

order (See Doc. 20), he failed to recognize that he had a previously scheduled, pre-paid vacation

for the period commencing on July 30, 2007 and extending through August 6, 2007. As a result

Case 1:06-cv-00766-LJO -SMS Document 24 Filed 07/24/07 Page 1 of 3
of this vacation, plaintiff’s counsel will be out of the office on both the date that defendants’

opposition papers are due (July 30) and on the date that plaintiff’s reply papers are due (August

6). Accordingly, plaintiff’s counsel requests that the Scheduling Order be amended to extend the

deadline for filing and serving plaintiff’s reply papers to and including August 13, 2007. This

extension will allow plaintiff’s counsel the normal one-week period in which to reply to

opposition papers under Local Rule 78-230(d) and will also satisfy that rule’s requirement that

reply papers be served and filed no less than five (5) court days preceding the date of the hearing

(scheduled for August 20, 2007).In conclusion, extending the deadline for plaintiff’s reply papers

will cause no prejudice to any party or to the Court and, therefore, it is respectfully requested that

this ex parte application be granted.

Case 1:06-cv-00766-LJO -SMS Document 24 Filed 07/24/07 Page 2 of 3
Dated: June 13, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF JERRY BUDIN

/s/ Jerry Budin

Jerry Budin

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DAVID FUSON

ORDER

The Court, having read and considered the above ex parte application and finding good

cause therefrom, 

HEREBY ORDERS that plaintiff’s deadline to file and serve a reply, if any, is extended 

to August 13, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 24, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00766-LJO -SMS Document 24 Filed 07/24/07 Page 3 of 3