Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03798/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03798-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

{10277-18 00353839.DOCX 1 } JOINT 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH

TOMAS MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555

HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196 

Justice at Work Law Group 

84 W. Santa Clara St., Ste. 790 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Tel: (408) 317-1100 

Fax: (408) 351-0105 

Tomas@JAWLawGroup.com 

Huy@JAWLawGroup.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ARTURO DE LA CRUZ 

PAUL V. SIMPSON, BAR NO. 83878 

SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI 

Professional Corporation 

601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 950 

South San Francisco, CA 94080 

Telephone: (650) 615-4860 

Fax: (650) 615-4861 

psimpson@sgijlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SPOSETO ENGINEERING, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ARTURO DE LA CRUZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SPOSETO ENGINEERING, INC., 

Defendant.. 

Case No. 15-cv-03798 EMC 

STIPULATION AND & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO DISMISS MATTER 

 

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN 

WHEREAS the parties conducted a confidential mediation session sponsored by this 

Court on March 3, 2016 and the Parties reached a complete settlement of the named Plaintiff ARTURO 

DE LA CRUZ’s claims in the above-captioned matter; 

WHEREAS the settlement calls for a Dismissal With Prejudice of all Plaintiff 

ARTURO DE LA CRUZ’s claims in the Complaint. 

Case 3:15-cv-03798-EMC Document 25 Filed 03/23/16 Page 1 of 2
 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

{10277-18 00353839.DOCX 1 } STIPULATION 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

DISMISSAL

1. 

WHERAS the parties desire the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the payment 

provisions in the settlement agreement only through May 1, 2016. 

The Parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] 

Order requesting dismissal. Thus, the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, respectfully request 

that the Court enter this Stipulation as an Order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Dated: March 22, 2016 //s// Tomas E. Margain 

TOMAS MARGAIN 

Counsel for Plaintiff ARTURO DE LA CRUZ 

Dated: March 22, 2016 //s// PAUL V. SIMPSON 

PAUL V. SIMPSON 

Counsel for Defendant SPOSETO 

ENGINEERING, INC. 

ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, and Good Cause 

appearing therefore, that the above entitled action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to vacate all future dates and close the file. The Court retains 

jurisdiction to enforce the payment terms of the agreement through May 1, 2016 only. 

Each side shall bear its own costs and fees. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: By: 

 EDWARD M. CHEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

JUDGE

3/23/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-03798-EMC Document 25 Filed 03/23/16 Page 2 of 2