Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00519/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00519-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN ESPRITT, 

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

A. SAESEE, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:11-cv-00519-AWI-GSA-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 23.)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE 

RELIEF

(Doc. 21.)

Brian Espritt (APlaintiff@) a civil detainee at Atascadero State Hospital in Atascadero, 

California, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On April 30, 2013, Findings and Recommendations were filed that recommended 

dismissal of certain claims and defendants. (Doc. 30.) Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to 

file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. Plaintiff filed no 

objection or response of any kind.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 

analysis.

Case 1:11-cv-00519-AWI-SAB Document 33 Filed 06/20/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 30, 

2013, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This action shall proceed only against defendants Saesee, Hill, Torres, Davis, 

Lopez, Ballesteros, and Magallon for use of excessive force in violation of the 

Eighth Amendment; and

3. All remaining claims and defendants are dismissed from this action; 

a. Plaintiff’s claim for loss of property, ADA claim, medical claim, claim 

for denial of access to courts, and claims for declaratory relief and 

attorney’s fees are dismissed from this action based on Plaintiff’s failure 

to state a claim; and 

b. Defendants Velazquez, Furlong, and Goss are dismissed from this action 

based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be 

granted against them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 19, 2013 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

0m8i788

Case 1:11-cv-00519-AWI-SAB Document 33 Filed 06/20/13 Page 2 of 2