Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03050/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03050-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1 MANI SUBRAMANIAN [Pro Se] 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

c/o Robert Oca 

P.O. Box 12231 

San Francisco, CA 94112 

(206) 984-4644 

(206) 984-4644 [fax] 

Plaintiff Pro Se

WILLIAM D. CONNELL, State Bar No. 89124 

SALLIE KIM, State Bar No. 142781 

GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP 

1891 Landings Drive 

Mountain View, CA 94043 

(650) 428-3900 

(650) 428-3901 [fax] 

Attorneys for Defendants QAD Inc. and 

William D. Connell 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MANI SUBRAMANIAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

QAD INC., et al. 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C-06-03050-VRW [ECF] 

Civil L-R 7-12 

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE THE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR 

MARCH 6, 2007 TO APRIL 24, 2007 

Courtroom: 6 [17th floor] 

Judge: Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order - 1 -

Case 3:06-cv-03050-VRW Document 76 Filed 02/27/2007 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-03050-VRW Document 77 Filed 02/28/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

STIPULATION 

The parties to the above-captioned action jointly submit this Stipulation and Proposed 

Order and request the Court to grant the relief sought herein. 

1. ACTION REQUESTED 

For all the good reasons set out below, the parties request the Court to continue the initial 

Case Management Conference from the presently scheduled date of March 6, 2007, to April 24, 

2007, or as soon thereafter as the Court deems appropriate. 

2. REASONS SUPPORTING THE REQUEST 

On February 21, 2007, the Court entered an order regarding Defendants’ Motions to 

Dismiss/Strike, see Docket-#75 (“Order”). The Order dismissed the Second and Third Causes of 

Action in the First Amended Complaint, without leave to amend, so that only remaining cause of 

action is the First Cause of Action, and the only remaining defendant is QAD Inc. 

Defendant QAD Inc. now has until March 5, 2007 to file an answer. 

After the filing of such an answer, the parties propose to meet and confer under FRCP rule 

26(f) not later than March 16, 2007. 

The parties are currently scheduled to participate in an ADR telephone conference on 

March 1, 2007, see Docket-#74. 

Under FRCP rule 26(a), the initial disclosure of the parties are thus due by March 30, 2007. 

It is further contemplated that a joint discovery plan or individual discovery plans can be finalized 

by that date. 

In addition, the parties would need at least two weeks to review the initial disclosures made 

by March 30, 2007 and to further meet and confer regarding the proposed discovery plans. This 

brings the date for the earliest practical date for a case management conference to the week of April 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order - 2 -

Case 3:06-cv-03050-VRW Document 76 Filed 02/27/2007 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-03050-VRW Document 77 Filed 02/28/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

16, 2007. Because Plaintiff is unavailable during the week of April 16, 2007, the parties thus 

propose that the Case Management Conference be scheduled for April 24, 2007, which date, the 

parties understand, is available on the Court’s calendar. 

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the court to enter the proposed order attached 

to this stipulation and continue the Case Management Conference as requested. 

Dated: February 27, 2007 WILLIAM D. CONNELL 

 SALLIE KIM 

 GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP 

 By: /s/ William D. Connell 

 /s/ Sallie Kim________ 

 Attorneys for Defendants QAD Inc. and 

 William D. Connell 

Dated: February 27, 2007 MANI SUBRAMANIAN [PRO SE] 

 /s/ Mani Subramanian________ 

Next Page: Proposed Order

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order - 3 -

Case 3:06-cv-03050-VRW Document 76 Filed 02/27/2007 Page 3 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-03050-VRW Document 77 Filed 02/28/07 Page 3 of 4
1 [Proposed] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

 The Case Management Statement currently scheduled for March 6, 2007 at 9:00 AM shall 

be continued to April 24, 2007 at 9:00 AM. 

 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________ ___, 2007 

 

___________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 [Proposed] Order - 1 -

Case 3:06-cv-03050-VRW Document 76 Filed 02/27/2007 Page 4 of 4

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANTED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Feb. 28

Case 3:06-cv-03050-VRW Document 77 Filed 02/28/07 Page 4 of 4