Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00565/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00565-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

PG. 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

The Law Offices of John L. Burris

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120

Oakland, California 94621

Telephone: (510) 839-5200

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. (SBN 69888)

DeWITT M. LACY, Esq. (SBN 258789)

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

Airport Corporate Centre

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120

Oakland, California 94621

Telephone: (510) 839-5200

Facsimile: (510) 839-3882

john.burris@johnburrislaw.com

dewitt.lacy@johnburrislaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYLVIA HAYNES, successor-in-interest 

to Donald Ray Haynes, ANNTIONETT 

HAYNES, individually; THE ESTATE OF 

DONALD RAY HAYNES

Plaintiffs,

v.

ROBERT JOHNSON, individually and in 

his official capacity as a police officer for 

the City of Stockton Police Department; 

WILLIAM KAMBIC, individually and in 

his official capacity as a police officer for 

the City of Stockton Police Department; 

DANA MOSHER, individually; RYAN 

MORRIS, individually and in his official 

capacity as a police officer for the City of 

Stockton Police Department; and DOES 1-

25, inclusive, individually, jointly and 

severally,

 Defendants.

Case No. 2:15-cv-00565-WBS-CKD

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, through their

attorneys of record:

WHEREAS, neither party has completed depositions in the matter;

Case 2:15-cv-00565-WBS-DB Document 15 Filed 03/09/16 Page 1 of 2
PG. 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

The Law Offices of John L. Burris

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120

Oakland, California 94621

Telephone: (510) 839-5200

WHEREAS in this matter, efficiency dictates that the disclosure of experts should

occur following the depositions of defendant officers who have not yet been deposed;

WHEREAS moving the discovery dates will not change the trial date in this matter;

The parties jointly request that the discovery deadlines be extended, as follows:

Old New

Expert disclosures 03/25/16 04/25/2016

Rebuttal expert disclosures 04/22/16 05/20/2016

Discovery completed 05/06/16 06/06/2016

Dated: March 1, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

By: /s/ DeWitt M. Lacy .

DeWitt M. Lacy

Attorney(s) for Plaintiffs

Dated: March 3, 2016 Stockton City Attorney's Office

By: _*/s/__________________________

Ted Daniel Wood

Deputy City Attorney

 *Mr. Wood provided consent that this

 document be electronically filed.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that the current discovery deadlines are extended in accordance with the 

schedule set forth in the table above.

Dated: March 9, 2016

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00565-WBS-DB Document 15 Filed 03/09/16 Page 2 of 2