Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01822/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01822-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 On June 20, 2007, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Motion For Leave To Appeal In 1

Forma (Indigent) Pauperis, 28 USC § 1915.” This motion does not comply with the court’s May

1, 2007 order, and was directed to the U.S. Court of Appeals. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT F. RIVERA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1822 FCD DAD P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed May 1, 2007, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed

application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days. In

addition, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint

was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that

this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a

completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the appropriate filing fee, has not 1

filed an amended complaint, and has not otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

/////

Case 2:06-cv-01822-FCD-DAD Document 20 Filed 07/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110 (E.D. Cal. 1997); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 13, 2007.

DAD:dk

rive1822.fifp.fta

Case 2:06-cv-01822-FCD-DAD Document 20 Filed 07/16/07 Page 2 of 2