Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02786/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02786-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-02786 CRB 

2892621_1.DOC 

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838 

E-Mail: nlocker@wsgr.com 

STEVEN D. GUGGENHEIM, State Bar No. 201386 

E-Mail: sguggenheim@wsgr.com 

MARK T. OAKES, State Bar No. 234598 

E-Mail: moakes@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Email: moakes@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ANDREW E. ROTH, derivatively on behalf of 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC. 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GREGORY REYES, MICHAEL BYRD, 

ANTONIO CANOVA, JACK CUTHBERT, and 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 3:06-cv-02786 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE 

TO COMPLAINT 

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 10 Filed 06/07/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:06-cv-02786 CRB 

-1- 2892621_1.DOC 

WHEREAS, Brocade’s response to the Complaint for Violation of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Complaint”) is currently due June 5, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Brocade wishes to extend the time to respond to the Complaint and plaintiff 

does not object; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, 

subject to the approval of the Court, that the deadline for Brocade to respond to the Complaint 

shall be continued until June 8, 2006. 

Dated: June 2, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Mark T. Oakes 

Mark T. Oakes 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 

Dated: June 2, 2006 SCHUBERT & REED LLP 

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 

San Francisco, California 94111 

 Telephone: (415) 788-4220 

By: /s/ Robert C. Schubert 

Robert C. Schubert 

Willem F. Jonckheer 

Local Counsel for Plaintiff 

 Paul D. Wexler 

BRAGAR WEXLER & EAGEL, P.C. 

885 Third Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

 Telephone: (212) 308-5858 

Glenn F. Ostrager 

OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY & 

BROITMAN P.C. 

250 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10177-0899 

 Telephone: (212) 681-0600 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 10 Filed 06/07/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:06-cv-02786 CRB 

-2- 2892621_1.DOC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the deadline for Brocade to 

respond to the Complaint is continued until June 8, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ _________________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

 United States District Judge 

Jun 5, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 10 Filed 06/07/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:06-cv-02786 CRB 

-3- 2892621_1.DOC 

 I, Mark T. Oakes, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO 

COMPLAINT. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Robert C. 

Schubert has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: June 2, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. 

 /s/ Mark T. Oakes 

 Mark T. Oakes 

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 10 Filed 06/07/06 Page 4 of 4