Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01779/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01779-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELVIN SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-00639-HSG 

ORDER DETERMINING CASES ARE 

NOT RELATED

Re: Dkt. No. 36

Before the Court is a sua sponte judicial referral for the purpose of determining whether 

Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al, numbered 15-cv-01779-YGR, is related to the abovecaptioned matter. The time to file an opposition or statement of support has passed. 

The Court finds that these cases are not related under Civil Local Rule 3-12(a)(2), which 

provides that cases are related if “[i]t appears likely that there will be an unduly burdensome 

duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if the cases are conducted before different 

Judges.” Because the above-captioned matter was terminated on April 24, 2015 prior to the 

issuance of any substantive rulings by this Court, there will be no duplication of labor and expense 

or risk of conflicting results if the cases are conducted before different judges.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

10/28/2015

Case 4:15-cv-01779-YGR Document 34 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 1