Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02225/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02225-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELEAZAR VILLEGAS, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-2225 FCD PAN P

vs.

 L. ROBINSON, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 13, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:02-cv-02225-FCD-EFB Document 47 Filed 08/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 13, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. The October 19, 2004, motion to dismiss is granted in part;

3. All claims against defendants Wicks, Varcoe, Knowles, Grannis, Driggers,

Brown and McDonald are dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted;

4. All claims against Robinson and Tice, except those alleged in paragraphs 16-20

of the amended complaint, are dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted; and, 

5. Defendants Robinson and Tice are required to respond to the amended

complaint, which the court construes as alleging claims defendants violated plaintiff’s right of

access to the courts and retaliated against him for the exercise of First Amendment rights, within

30 days. 

DATED:August 19, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:02-cv-02225-FCD-EFB Document 47 Filed 08/19/05 Page 2 of 2