Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05466/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05466-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD GLASS,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. BEER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:04-CV-05466-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

RELIEVING PLAINTIFF OF OBLIGATION TO

RESPOND TO MOTION UNTIL NOTIFIED

OTHERWISE BY THE COURT

(Docs. 109 and 110)

In a separate order issued concurrently with this order, the court granted in part and denied

in part plaintiff’s motion to compel. Defendants were ordered to respond to select discovery

requests, plaintiff was granted leave to rephrase and re-serve select discovery requests, and plaintiff

was granted leave to file another motion to compel responses to select discovery requests. The court

finds it is appropriate for plaintiff to be relieved of his obligation to file an opposition to defendants’

motion for summary judgment until the discovery disputes in this action are deemed by the court to

be sufficiently resolved. Fed. Civ. P. 56(f); Garrett v. City and County of San Francisco, 818 F.2d

1515, 1518-19 (9th Cir. 1987). The court will notify plaintiff when it is time for him to respond to

the motion and will set a deadline.

It is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motions for an extension of time, filed August 31, 2006, and September

5, 2006, are GRANTED; and

///

Case 1:04-cv-05466-OWW -SMS Document 125 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiff is relieved of his obligation to respond to defendants’ motion for summary

judgment until notified otherwise by the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05466-OWW -SMS Document 125 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 2