Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-mc-80012/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-mc-80012-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 5:16-MC-80012-NC

David J. Miclean (SBN 115098)

dmiclean@micleangleason.com

Carmen M. Aviles (SBN 251993)

caviles@micleangleason.com

MICLEAN GLEASON LLP

411 Borel Avenue, Suite 310

San Mateo, CA 94402

Office: (650) 684-1181

Fax: (650) 684-1182

Craig S. Jepson (SBN 132150)

REED & SCARDINO LLP

301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1250

Austin, TX 78701

Telephone: (512) 474-2449

Facsimile: (512) 474-2622

cjepson@reedscardino.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS

TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS 

TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., SAMSUNG 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 

LLC.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 5:16-mc-80012-NC

JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST 

TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOBILE 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS 

TECHNOLOGIES’ MOTION TO 

COMPEL AND ORDER AS MODIFIED

[L.R. CIV. 7-7]

Case 5:16-mc-80012-NC Document 21 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 5:16-MC-80012-NC

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC (“MTel”) filed a 

Motion to Compel Third-Party Google, Inc. to Produce Documents and to Make Available an 

Additional Witness and Request for Sanctions Pursuant to FRCP 37 (hereinafter, “Motion”) on 

January 14, 2016 (Dkt. No. 1).

WHEREAS, hearing on the Motion was set by the Court for February 10, 2016 (Dkt. 9).

WHEREAS, third-party Google, Inc. (“Google) filed an Opposition to the Motion on 

January 28, 2016 (Dkt. No. 28). 

WHEREAS, MTel filed its Reply to Google’s Opposition on February 4, 2016 (Dkt. No. 

18). 

WHEREAS, all briefing on MTel’s Motion is complete. The Parties have since 

conferred on resolving the dispute through a mutually agreeable understanding. In view of the 

potential resolution of the dispute, the Parties request a continuance of the hearing. 

WHEREAS, this is the Parties’ first request to continue the hearing. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties request the Court continue the hearing to March 16, 

2016, or any other time thereafter that is convenient for the Court. 

Dated: February 10, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

MICLEAN GLEASON LLP

By /s/ Carmen M. Aviles

David J. Miclean

Carmen M. Aviles

Attorneys for Plaintiff Mobile

Telecommunications Technologies, LLC

Case 5:16-mc-80012-NC Document 21 Filed 02/10/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 5:16-MC-80012-NC

Dated: February 10, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &

SULLIVAN, LLP

By /s/ Andrea Pallios Roberts

 Andrea Pallios Roberts

 Attorneys for Third-Party Google Inc.

MODIFIED ORDER 

The hearing on Plaintiff Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC’s Motion to 

Compel is continued to March 30, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose.

Dated: February 10, 2016 ___________________________________

HONORABLE NATHANAEL COUSINS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:16-mc-80012-NC Document 21 Filed 02/10/16 Page 3 of 3