Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01835/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01835-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HILDEGARD GUNN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SUTTER HOME WINERY, INC.,

TRINCHERO FAMILY ESTATE, INC.,

dba SUTTER HOME WINERY, INC.,

and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-01835 WHA

ORDER RE 

DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Give the death of Mr. Jennings’ son (and paralelgal), there was substantial justification

for the deadline lapse and defense counsel were unreasonable to reject his request for more

time. Counsel shall meet-and-confer before the hearing on Wednesday and propose (at the

hearing) a new schedule to accommodate the tragedy. 

As for the August 10 letter re Dr. Alpert, defense counsel should make sure Dr. Alpert is

present at the August 16 hearing (in person in the courtroom). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 14, 2006. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-01835-WHA Document 21 Filed 08/14/06 Page 1 of 1