Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02517/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02517-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2517

SHERRI BOARDLEY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:15-cv-00634-HEH)

Submitted: April 29, 2016 Decided: May 31, 2016

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherri Boardley, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Lewis Kincer, Jr., 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2517 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/31/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Sherri Boardley seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing her complaint without prejudice. This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial 

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order 

Boardley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar 

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 

(4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we grant Appellee’s motion to 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case 

to the district court with instructions to allow Boardley to 

file an amended complaint. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid 

Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 630 (4th Cir. 2015). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED

Appeal: 15-2517 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/31/2016 Pg: 2 of 2