Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00080/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00080-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EARNEST S. HARRIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SEXTON, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:18-cv-00080-DAD-SAB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Doc. No. 9)

Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 15, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge issued 

findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunctive 

relief raised in his civil rights complaint be denied. The findings and recommendations were 

served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty-one 

days. Plaintiff filed objections April 9, 2018. (Doc. No. 13.) 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the undersigned has 

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

undersigned concludes the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by 

proper analysis. Plaintiff’s objections do not demonstrate that he is likely to succeed on the 

Case 1:18-cv-00080-DC-SCR Document 18 Filed 06/21/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

merits of this action, even though certain of his claims have been found cognizable.

Accordingly:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on March 15, 2018 (Doc. No. 9) are 

adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunctive relief is denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 21, 2018 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:18-cv-00080-DC-SCR Document 18 Filed 06/21/18 Page 2 of 2