Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02820/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02820-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-02820-TLN-CKD 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION

ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; 

ALLIED INSURANCE COMPANY, a 

Pennsylvania corporation; AMCO 

INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa 

corporation; AMERICAN HOME 

ASSURANCE COMPANY, a New York 

corporation; AMERICAN 

INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES 

INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois 

corporation; AMERICAN SAFETY 

CLAIMS SERVICES, a Georgia 

corporation; AMERICAN SAFETY 

INDEMNITY COMPANY, an Oklahoma 

corporation; AMERICAN SAFETY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Georgia 

corporation; ARCH SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska 

corporation; ASSURANCE COMPANY 

OF AMERICA, a New York corporation; 

AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE 

COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; 

CATALINA HOLDINGS (BERMUDA) 

LTD, a New York corporation; CENTURY 

SURETY COMPANY, an Ohio 

corporation; CHARTIS SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois 

corporation; CLARENDON AMERICA 

INSURANCE COMPANY, New Jersey 

corporation; EVEREST INDEMNITY 

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; 

EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE 

Case No. 2:12-cv-02820-TLN-CKD

Hon. Troy L. Nunley 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO INITIAL 

COMPLAINT (L.R. 8-3) 

Complaint Served: December 27, 2012 

Current Response Date: Indefinite 

Extension 

 New Response Date: August 30, 2013 

 

Case 2:12-cv-02820-TLN-CKD Document 187 Filed 08/15/13 Page 1 of 3
2 

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-02820-TLN-CKD 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; 

FARMER’S INSURANCE COMPANY, a 

Kansas corporation; FINANCIAL 

PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a 

California corporation; FIRST MERCURY 

INSURANCE COMPANY; an Illinois 

corporation; GOLDEN EAGLE 

INSURANCE CORPORATION, a New 

Hampshire corporation; GREAT 

AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, 

an Ohio corporation; HARTFORD 

INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana 

corporation; HARTFORD FIRE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut 

corporation; ILLINOIS UNION 

INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois 

corporation; INSCORP, New York 

corporation; INTERSTATE FIRE & 

CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois 

corporation; LEXINGTON INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; 

LLOYD’S OF LONDON, a Kentucky 

corporation; LUMBERMENS MUTUAL 

CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois 

corporation; MARYLAND CASUALTY 

COMPANY; a Maryland corporation; 

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; 

NATIONWIDE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation; 

NAVIGATORS INSURANCE 

COMPANY; a New York corporation; NIC 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York 

corporation; NORTHERN INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a New York 

corporation; OLD REPUBLIC 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania 

corporation; PENNSYLVANIA 

GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; 

PRAETORIAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; 

PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE, a District of Colombia 

corporation; STATE NATIONAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Texas 

corporation; STEADFAST INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; 

VALIANT INSURANCE COMPANY, a 

Delaware corporation; ZURICH 

AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a 

New York corporation and does 1-10, 

inclusive 

Case 2:12-cv-02820-TLN-CKD Document 187 Filed 08/15/13 Page 2 of 3
3 

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-02820-TLN-CKD 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Defendants. 

1. On stipulation of the parties and having found that good cause exists to extend 

the time for Farmers Insurance Company to respond to the Complaint, it is hereby 

ORDERED that: 

2. The time for Farmers Insurance Company to respond to the Complaint is 

hereby extended to August 30, 2013. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: August 15, 2013 

 

 

Case 2:12-cv-02820-TLN-CKD Document 187 Filed 08/15/13 Page 3 of 3