Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00904/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00904-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

{12795/15369/LBG/946656.DOC;} 1 Stip. & [Proposed] Order for Ext. of Time for 

Def. Payne, et al. to Respond to Complaint 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Louise Burda Gilbert, California State Bar No. 70957 

weintraub genshlea chediak

a law corporation 

400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: 916/558-6000 

Facsimile: 916/446-1611 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Payne, Thompson, Walker & Taaffe 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING 

ENGINEERS LOCAL 3; BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES OF THE PENSION TRUST FUND 

FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 3; 

JOHN BONILLA; GIL CROSTHWAITE; 

ROBERT DOUB; THOMAS HOLSMAN; 

JOHN HUMBER; JIM MURRAY; RICHARD 

PIOMBO; RENE VERERUYSSEN; KEN 

WALTERS; LANCE WILHELM; CURTIS 

BROOKS; RUSS BURNS; CARL GOFF; 

FRANK HERRERA; T. ROBERT MILLER; 

WALT POWERS; JOE VIEIRA; ROB WISE, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

McMORGAN & CO.; McMORGAN & 

COMPANY LLC; LIFFEY, LLC; STANTON, 

KAY & WATSON; WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD; VAN BOURG, WEINBERG, 

ROGER & ROSENFELD; JAMES WATSON; 

BARRY HINKLE; EDWARD MEVI; DAVID 

HOWARD; PAYNE, THOMPSON, WALKER 

& TAAFFE; and DOES 1 to 100 inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CIV.S-06-0904 WBS EFB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

PAYNE, THOMPSON, WALKER & TAAFFE 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers Local 3, et al. (“plaintiffs”) and 

defendant Payne, Thompson, Walker & Taaffe (“Payne”), by and through their 

counsel, hereby stipulate to 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00904-WBS-EFB Document 97 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 3
{12795/15369/LBG/946656.DOC;} 2 Stip. & [Proposed] Order for Ext. of Time for 

Def. Payne, et al. to Respond to Complaint 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

/ / / 

an extension of time, up to and including June 18, 2007, for Payne to respond to 

plaintiffs’ complaint. 

Payne has provided information to plaintiffs showing that Payne ceased 

operations in 1995. Payne has also requested that plaintiffs dismiss Payne from 

the lawsuit. 

The parties have scheduled a mediation for May 2007 that may impact the 

need for further proceedings. 

No prejudice will occur if the time for Payne to respond is extended as 

requested. 

Dated: April 6, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

 WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK

 a law corporation 

 By: /s/ - Louise Burda Gilbert 

 Louise Burda Gilbert 

 State Bar No. 70957 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 Payne, Thompson, Walker & Taaffe 

 

Dated: April 6, 2007 ASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK, MILLER, 

 JOHNSON & UHRHAMMER

A Professional Corporation 

 By: /s/ - Amanda Uhrhammer 

 Amanda Uhrhammer 

 State Bar No. 199445 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that defendant Payne Thompson Walker & Taaffe shall 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00904-WBS-EFB Document 97 Filed 04/10/07 Page 2 of 3
{12795/15369/LBG/946656.DOC;} 3 Stip. & [Proposed] Order for Ext. of Time for 

Def. Payne, et al. to Respond to Complaint 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

have up to and including June 18, 2007 to respond to the plaintiffs’ complaint. 

Dated: April 9, 2007 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00904-WBS-EFB Document 97 Filed 04/10/07 Page 3 of 3