Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00836/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00836-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN DANIEL BLYMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

DANIEL PARAMO, Warden,

Respondent.

No. 1:14-cv-00836-DAD-SKO HC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

THAT THE PETITION BE DISMISSED 

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(Doc. 40)

Petitioner Stephen Daniel Blyman is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of 

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 1, 2016, this Court lifted the order of stay 

and abeyance in the above-captioned case and directed Petitioner to file an amended petition 

including the newly exhausted claims by July 29, 2016. Petitioner did not file an amended 

petition. As a result, on August 10, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued an order to show cause 

why the petition should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Although Petitioner was 

required to respond to the order within 15 days, Petitioner has filed neither a response nor an 

amended petition.

The Court has discretion to impose any and all sanctions authorized by statute or rule or 

within the inherent power of the Court, including dismissing the action, based on a petitioner’s 

failure to comply with a court order. F.R.Civ.P. 11; Local R. 110.

///

Case 1:14-cv-00836-DAD-SKO Document 41 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Conclusion and Recommendation

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned hereby RECOMMENDS that the Court dismiss 

the petition for failure to prosecute.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District 

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C ' 636(b)(1). Within thirty 

(30) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Petitioner may file 

written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned AObjections to Magistrate 

Judge=s Findings and Recommendations.@ Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may constitute waiver of the right to appeal the District Court's order. 

Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 ((9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 

1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 2, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00836-DAD-SKO Document 41 Filed 09/06/16 Page 2 of 2