Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-02003/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-02003-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 05cv2003 BTM(CAB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUSSO BAILEY,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 05cv2003 BTM(CAB)

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO

vs. REOPEN

E. DUESLER, ET AL.,

Defendants.

In an order filed on November 28, 2006, the Court granted Defendants’ motion for

partial judgment on the pleadings and motion for partial summary judgment. Final judgment

was entered on November 30, 2006.

On July 24, 2007, the Court received Plaintiff’s “Request to Reopen.” The Court

construes the request as a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). 

Plaintiff claims that defendant William Kolender kidnaped Plaintiff and detained him

for a period of six months. According to Plaintiff, due to the kidnaping, he could not respond

to the Court’s summary judgment. 

However, the record reflects that Plaintiff filed a response to Defendants’ motions for

summary judgment and judgment on the pleadings on September 20, 2006. The Court read

and considered Plaintiff’s opposition papers before ruling on Defendants’ motions. To the

extent that Plaintiff claims that he was prevented from filing a motion for reconsideration of

the Court’s order, Plaintiff does not identify any grounds for amending or setting aside the

Case 3:05-cv-02003-BTM-CAB Document 47 Filed 07/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 05cv2003 BTM(CAB)

judgment.

Therefore, Plaintiff’s request to reopen the case is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 30, 2007

Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-02003-BTM-CAB Document 47 Filed 07/30/07 Page 2 of 2