Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01527/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01527-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM ROUSER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1527 LKK GGH P

vs.

JAMES E. TILTON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On February 16, 2007, plaintiff filed an “opposition” to the magistrate judge’s

order filed February 8, 2007, ordering plaintiff to file either an application to proceed in forma

pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The court construes plaintiff’s opposition as a request for

reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be

upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court

finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary

to law.

 /////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-01527-LKK -GGH Document 13 Filed 03/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed February 8, 2007, is affirmed. Plaintiff shall file an application to proceed

in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee within twenty days of the date of this order. 

DATED: March 12, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-01527-LKK -GGH Document 13 Filed 03/13/07 Page 2 of 2