Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01611/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01611-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND C. EVANS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

)

UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-CV-01611 OWW GSA HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #7]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS AND DISMISSING

MOTIONS AS MOOT

[Docs. #8, 9, 10]

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On November 27, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED because the petition does not

allege grounds that would entitle Petitioner to habeas corpus relief. This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. 

Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:07-cv-01611-OWW -GSA Document 11 Filed 01/03/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued November 27, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; 

3. All outstanding motions are DISMISSED as moot; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01611-OWW -GSA Document 11 Filed 01/03/08 Page 2 of 2