Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01094/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01094-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OLDEN TAYLOR,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:09-cv-01094-OWW-GSA-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON

WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED 

(Doc. 1.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

Plaintiff Olden Taylor (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on June 22, 2009. (Doc. 1.)

On December 11, 2009, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state

a claim upon which relief may be granted and gave Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint

within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). (Doc.13.) Plaintiff requested and was

granted an extension of time in which to file the amended complaint. (Docs. 14, 15.) To date,

Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is 1

no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which reliefmay be granted under section 1983. 

On January 14, 2010, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address to a street address in Rialto, California.

1

(Doc. 16.) On January 25, 2010, the court served a copy of the order granting plaintiff's extension of time upon

plaintiff at his new address, and the mail was not returned. (See Court Docket.) Due to the service on January 25,

2010, plaintiff's deadline to file the amended complaint was March 1, 2010. Therefore, more than forty-five days

have passed, and plaintiff has not complied with the court's order.

1

Case 1:09-cv-01094-OWW -GSA Document 17 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the undersigned

HEREBYRECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure

to state any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30)

days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written

objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d

1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 21, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-01094-OWW -GSA Document 17 Filed 04/21/10 Page 2 of 2