Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00928/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00928-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332pi Diversity-Personal Injury

---

1 

17-cv-928 CAB (JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REEM MOHAMED,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SEA WORLD, LLC, 

Defendant.

Case No.: 17-cv-928 CAB (JLB)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART JOINT 

MOTION AND STIPULATION RE: 

EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION 

CONFERENCE AND TELEPHONIC 

CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion and Stipulation Re: Early Neutral 

Evaluation Conference and Telephonic Case Management Conference. (ECF No. 9.) The 

parties request that an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference not be set in this case because 

they recently attended a full-day private mediation. (Id. at 2.) The parties further request 

that they be allowed to appear telephonically at the Case Management Conference set for 

this case. (Id.) 

Rule 16.1.c. of this Court’s Civil Local Rules requires that an Early Neutral 

Evaluation Conference be held within 45 days of the filing of an answer, unless a case falls 

within the categories of cases listed under Civil Local Rule 16.1.e. CivLR 16.1.c. As this 

Case 3:17-cv-00928-CAB-JLB Document 10 Filed 06/30/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 8
2 

17-cv-928 CAB (JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

case does not fall within one of the categories of cases listed under Civil Local Rule 16.1.e., 

the parties must appear before the Court for an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. For 

this reason, the Court DENIES the parties’ request to exempt this case from the 

requirement of an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. However, because the parties 

recently attended a full day, in-person private mediation, the parties may appear 

telephonically, through their respective counsel, at the Early Neutral Evaluation 

Conference before the Court. Additionally, because the parties will appear telephonically 

at the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, the Court GRANTS the parties’ request to 

appear telephonically, through their respective counsel, at the Case Management 

Conference in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a telephonic, counsel-only Early 

Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) of this case will be held on July 14, 2017, at 2:30 PM before

Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. Plaintiff’s principal attorney responsible for the 

litigation is responsible for placing one joint call with all participating counsel already on 

the line into Chambers at (619) 557-6624. 

In the event the case does not settle at the ENE Conference, a Case Management 

Conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) is SET for July 14, 2017, and will be held at 

the conclusion of the ENE Conference.

The following are mandatory directions for the parties preparing for the ENE

Conference. Absent express permission obtained from this Court, and 

notwithstanding the pendency of any motion, counsel shall timely comply with the 

dates and deadlines ordered herein.

1. Purpose of Conference: The purpose of the Early Neutral Evaluation 

Conference (“ENE”) is to permit an informal discussion between the attorneys, parties, and 

the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in an effort to achieve an early resolution 

of the case. All conference discussions will be informal, off the record, privileged and 

confidential. Counsel for any non-English speaking parties is responsible for arranging for 

the appearance of an interpreter at the conference.

Case 3:17-cv-00928-CAB-JLB Document 10 Filed 06/30/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 8
3 

17-cv-928 CAB (JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Personal Appearance of Parties Not Required: The principal attorneys

responsible for the litigation must appear by telephone and be legally and factually 

prepared to discuss settlement of the case. The principal attorneys are responsible for 

ensuring that all parties, adjusters for insured defendants, and other representatives of a 

party having full settlement authority as explained below may be reached by telephone 

should the need arise during the ENE Conference. Counsel appearing without a means to 

contact their clients by telephone (whether or not counsel has been given settlement 

authority) will be cause for immediate imposition of sanctions and may also result in the 

immediate termination of the conference. If each of the principal attorneys responsible for 

the litigation are not listed on the docket as an “ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED,” then they 

each shall enter their appearance on the docket as soon as practicable, but in no event later 

than ten calendar days prior to the ENE conference. 

Unless there are extraordinary circumstances, persons required to attend the 

conference pursuant to this Order shall not be excused from attendance. Requests for 

excuse from attendance for extraordinary circumstances shall be made in writing at 

least ten calendar days prior to the conference. Failure to appear at the ENE conference 

will be grounds for sanctions.

3. Full Settlement Authority Required1

: In addition to counsel who will try 

the case, a party or party representative with full settlement authority must be available by 

telephone should the need to contact them arise at the conference. In the case of an entity, 

an authorized representative of the entity who is not retained outside counsel must be 

 

1

 “Full settlement authority” means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be 

authorized to explore settlement options fully and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable 

to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989). The person 

needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman 

v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person with 

unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference contemplates that the person’s view of the case 

may be altered during the face to face conference. Id. at 486. A limited or a sum certain of authority is 

not adequate. See Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595-97 (8th Cir. 2001). 

Case 3:17-cv-00928-CAB-JLB Document 10 Filed 06/30/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 8
4 

17-cv-928 CAB (JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

present and must have discretionary authority to commit the entity to pay an amount up to 

the amount of the Plaintiff’s prayer (excluding punitive damages prayers). The purpose of 

this requirement is to have representatives available who can settle the case during the 

course of the conference without consulting a superior. 

4. ENE Statements Required: On or before July 6, 2017, the parties shall 

lodge statements of five pages or less directly to the chambers of Magistrate Judge 

Burkhardt outlining the nature of the case, the claims, the defenses, and the parties’ 

positions regarding settlement of the case. The settlement position must include a specific 

and current demand or offer addressing all relief or remedies sought. If a specific demand 

or offer cannot be made at the time the brief is submitted, then the reasons therefor must 

be stated along with a statement as to when the party will be in a position to state a demand 

or offer. A general statement that a party will “negotiate in good faith,” “offer a nominal 

cash sum,” or “be prepared to make an offer at the conference” is not a specific demand or 

offer. The statement shall also list all attorney and non-attorney conference attendees for 

that side, including the name(s) and title(s)/position(s) of the party/party representative(s) 

who will attend and have settlement authority at the conference. 

ENE statements shall be lodged via email at efile_burkhardt@casd.uscourts.gov. If 

exhibits are attached and the total submission amounts to more than 20 pages, a hard copy 

must also be delivered directly to chambers. Whether these statements are submitted 

confidentially or whether they are served on opposing counsel is within the parties’ 

discretion. Statements of more than five pages will not be considered.

5. Submission of Magistrate Judge Consent Form: No later than July 6, 2017, 

each party shall provide Plaintiff’s counsel with an executed copy of the attached consent 

form, titled Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge. 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73.1, if (and only if) all parties have consented to the reference 

to a magistrate judge, then Plaintiff shall file the consent form(s) in paper format at the 

Clerk’s Office by July 10, 2017. If the paper format filing reflects consent by all parties, 

then the form(s) will be forwarded to the assigned district judge for approval. The consent 

Case 3:17-cv-00928-CAB-JLB Document 10 Filed 06/30/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 4 of 8
5 

17-cv-928 CAB (JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

form(s) should not be filed with the court electronically through its Case 

Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. No consent form will be made 

available, nor will its contents be made known to any judicial officer, unless all parties 

have consented to the reference to a magistrate judge. The parties are free to withhold 

consent without adverse substantive consequences. Questions related to the consent 

form(s) should be directed only to the clerk’s office at 619-557-5600. Please do not call 

chambers’ staff with questions related to the consent form(s). 

6. New Parties Must Be Notified by Plaintiff’s Counsel: Plaintiff’s counsel

shall give notice of the ENE and this Order to parties responding to the complaint after the 

date of this notice.

7. Case Management Under the Amended Federal Rules: The parties are 

ordered to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and proceed with the initial disclosure process

as follows: 

a. The Rule 26(f) conference shall be completed on or before July 4, 2017; 

b. The date of initial disclosure pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) shall occur on or 

before July 6, 2017; 

c. A Joint Discovery Plan shall be filed on the CM/ECF system as well as 

lodged with Magistrate Judge Burkhardt by emailing the Plan to 

efile_burkhardt@casd.uscourts.gov, on or before July 6, 2017. The Plan must 

be one document and must explicitly cover the parties’ views and proposals 

for each item identified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3). The parties should consult 

both Judge Burkhardt’s and the assigned District Judge’s Civil Chambers 

Rules in drafting their Plan. A courtesy paper copy of the Plan shall be 

delivered to Judge Burkhardt’s Chambers if the plan with its attachments 

exceeds 20 pages. In addition to complying with Chambers Rules, the Plan 

should identify whether and what good cause (specific to this case) exists to 

modify the Court’s tentative schedule for this case. The Court’s tentative

schedule is as follows:

Case 3:17-cv-00928-CAB-JLB Document 10 Filed 06/30/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 5 of 8
6 

17-cv-928 CAB (JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

i. Filing of motions to amend pleadings and/or add parties: August 18, 

2017; 

ii. Completion of fact and expert witness discovery: January 12, 2018; 

iii. The designation and service of expert witness reports: November 10, 

2017; 

iv. The supplemental designation and service of rebuttal expert witness 

reports: December 15, 2017; 

v. The date by which dispositive motions, inclusive of any motions 

addressing any Daubert issues, shall be filed: February 9, 2018. 

Motions in limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as 

otherwise set by the District Judge;

vi. The date for the Mandatory Settlement Conference: January 30, 2018; 

and

vii. The date for a Pretrial Conference before the District Judge assigned to 

the case: June 8, 2018. 

8. Requests to Continue or Reschedule an ENE Conference: Local Rule 

16.1.c requires that an ENE take place within 45 days of the filing of the first answer. 

Requests to continue ENEs are rarely granted. However, the Court will consider formal, 

written ex parte or joint motions to continue an ENE conference when extraordinary 

circumstances exist that make a continuance appropriate. In and of itself, having to travel 

a long distance to appear in person is not “extraordinary.” Absent extraordinary 

circumstances, requests for continuances will not be considered unless filed no less than 

ten calendar days prior to the scheduled conference.

9. Settlement Prior to ENE Conference: The Court encourages the parties to 

work on settling the matter in advance of the ENE Conference. In the event that the parties 

resolve the matter prior to the day of the ENE Conference, the following procedures must 

be followed before the Court will vacate the ENE and excuse the parties from appearing:

///

Case 3:17-cv-00928-CAB-JLB Document 10 Filed 06/30/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 6 of 8
7 

17-cv-928 CAB (JLB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

a. The parties may file a Joint Motion to Dismiss and separately lodge by email 

a proposed order to the assigned District Judge.

2

 If a Joint Motion to Dismiss 

is filed, the Court will vacate the ENE. The parties are encouraged to contact 

Judge Burkhardt’s Chambers by telephone to notify the Court of their pending 

Joint Motion;

b. If the parties settle more than 24 hours before the conference but are not able 

to file a Joint Motion to Dismiss, they must file a Notice of Settlement 

containing the electronic signatures of counsel for all settling parties and 

identifying a date by which the Joint Motion to Dismiss will be filed. The 

parties are encouraged to contact Judge Burkhardt’s Chambers by telephone 

to notify the Court of their filed Notice of Settlement;

c. If the parties settle less than 24 hours before the conference, counsel for the 

settling parties must JOINTLY call chambers and inform the Court of the 

settlement and receive Court permission to not appear at the ENE.

After having reviewed Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules, appropriate 

questions regarding this case or the mandatory directions set forth herein may be addressed

to the Magistrate Judge’s law clerks at (619) 557-6624. For additional information, please 

see Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules. 

Dated: June 29, 2017

 

 

2 See Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, United States District 

Court for the Southern District of California § 2(h), for the chambers’ official email address and 

procedures on emailing proposed orders. 

Case 3:17-cv-00928-CAB-JLB Document 10 Filed 06/30/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 7 of 8
* Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73.1, if (and only if) all parties have consented to the reference to a magistrate judge, then Plaintiff shall file 

the consent form(s) in paper format at the Clerk’s Office.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REEM MOHAMED,

Plaintiff(s)

v. 

SEA WORLD, LLC, 

Defendant(s)

Case No.: 17-cv-928 CAB (JLB)

NOTICE, CONSENT, AND

REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO 

A MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Notice of a magistrate judge's availability. A United States magistrate judge of this court is 

available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to 

order the entry of a final judgment. The judgment may then be appealed directly to the United 

States court of appeals like any other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge may exercise 

this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent. 

You may consent to have your case referred to a magistrate judge, or you may withhold your 

consent without adverse substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding consent 

will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise be involved with your case. 

Consent to a magistrate judge's authority. The following parties consent to have a United States 

magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, 

and all post-trial proceedings.

Printed Names Signatures of all parties and counsel for all parties Dates

REFERENCE ORDER

IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt to 

conduct all proceedings and order entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 

636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. 

Date United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00928-CAB-JLB Document 10 Filed 06/30/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 8 of 8