Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01490/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01490-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 140
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Because oral argument will not be of material

assistance, the court orders this matter submitted on the briefs. 

E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g).

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

GHEORGHE G. BLEDEA,

NO. CIV. S-09-1490 FCD/EFB

Plaintiff,

v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WASHINGTON MUTUAL HOME

LOANS, et al.,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

This matter is before the court on defendants California

Reconveyance Company, Deutsche Bank Nation Trust Company, Long

Beach Mortgage Trust 2006-8, Mortgage Electronic Registration

Systems, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., for itself and as

acquirer of certain assets and liabilities of Washington Mutual

Bank’s (“moving defendants”) motion to dismiss plaintiff Gheorghe

G. Bledea’s first amended complaint.1 Plaintiff filed a nonopposition to the motion, and based thereon, the court HEREBY

Case 2:09-cv-01490-FCD-EFB Document 29 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 Plaintiff states in her non-opposition that she does

not oppose defendants’ motion and requests that the court dismiss

her “State Causes of Action.” Plaintiff’s first amended

complaint alleges nine causes of action pursuant to state law and

one federal claim under the Truth In Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. 

§ 1601 et seq. Defendants’ motion addresses all ten of

plaintiff’s claims. Because plaintiff proffers no substantive

opposition to the dismissal of her federal claim for relief, the

court construes her statement of non-opposition to the motion as

applying to her federal claim as well as her nine state causes of

action.

3 The court notes that plaintiff names other defendants

in her first amended complaint. It does not appear that service

has been effectuated on these defendants, and they have not

joined in the motion or responded to the first amended complaint. 

The instant order applies only to the moving defendants.

2

GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss in its entirety (Docket

#20).2 Moving defendants are hereby dismissed from this action.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 DATED: January 21, 2010

 FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:09-cv-01490-FCD-EFB Document 29 Filed 01/21/10 Page 2 of 2