Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01782/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01782-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Charles Robert Adams, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-13-01782-PHX-ROS

ORDER 

On July 1, 2014, Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey issued a Report and 

Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be 

denied. (Doc. 17). No objections were filed. 

A district judge Amay accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.@ 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b). Where any party 

has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge=s R&R, the district court’s review of 

the part objected to is to be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are filed, the district 

court need not conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 

(D. Ariz. 2003). No objections were filed and the R&R will be adopted in full. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) is ADOPTED and 

the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. 

Case 2:13-cv-01782-ROS Document 18 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the dismissal of the petition is justified 

by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling 

debatable. 

Dated this 13th day of August, 2014. 

Honorable Roslyn O. Silver

Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:13-cv-01782-ROS Document 18 Filed 08/13/14 Page 2 of 2