Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01505/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01505-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

LA #388548 v1/816790-21 CASE NO.: CIV02-1505-DFL-PAN 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING 

DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL CUT-OFF DATES

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LONNIE E. WOOLVERTON, CA BAR NO. 33720 

JOHN L. VIOLA, CA BAR NO. 131407 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

333 South Hope Street, 29th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3048 

Telephone: (213) 576-8000 

Facsimile: (213) 576-8080 

DAVEN G. LOWHURST, CA BAR NO. 124723 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3601 

Telephone: (415) 371-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 371-1211 

Attorneys for OEA, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EVANSTON INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

OEA, INC. and DOES 1 through 20, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No.: CIV 02-1505-DFL-PAN 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING DISCOVERY 

AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL CUT-OFF 

DATES 

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01505-DFL-EFB Document 523 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

LA #388548 v1/816790-21 -1- CASE NO.: CIV02-1505-DFL-PAN 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING 

DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL CUT-OFF DATES

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

The remaining parties to this action, OEA, Inc. (“OEA”) and Certain 

Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, et al. (“Underwriters”), are currently engaged in 

motion practice regarding discovery propounded by each of them. In addition, the 

parties need this written discovery to be completed to effectively take the depositions 

relevant in this matter. Still further, Underwriters has filed a Motion for 

Reconsideration of the Court’s December 20, 2005 Order on their Partial Summary 

Judgment Motion. Due to all of these factors, the parties are unable to comply with 

the dates set by the Court at the hearing of September 9, 2005, for motion cut-off, 

discovery cut-off and other pre-trial dates. The parties, therefore, stipulate to extend 

the discovery, motion and other pre-trial dates as follows: 

Current Date New Date 

Last day for OEA to file its Motion for Summary 

Judgment – February 22, 2006

May 3, 2006 

Initial Expert Disclosure – March 1, 2006 May 10, 2006

Last day for Underwriters to file their Motion for 

Summary Judgment and to Oppose OEA’s Motion 

for Summary Judgment – March 8, 2006

May 17, 2006 

Last day for OEA to file a Reply in Support of its 

Motion for Summary Judgment and last day for 

OEA to file its Opposition to Underwriters’ 

Motion for Summary Judgment – March 22, 2006

May 31, 2006 

Rebuttal/Supplemental Expert Disclosure – 

March 24, 2006 

June 2, 2006

Last day for Underwriters to file their Reply in 

Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment 

and Discovery cut-off– April 5, 2006

June 14, 2006 

Hearing on Summary Judgment Motions – June 28, 2006

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01505-DFL-EFB Document 523 Filed 02/02/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

LA #388548 v1/816790-21 -2- CASE NO.: CIV02-1505-DFL-PAN 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING 

DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL CUT-OFF DATES

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

April 14, 2006 

The parties cannot agree upon whether the final pre-trial conference and trial in 

this matter should be continued. OEA requests the pre-trial conference and trial dates 

remain as currently scheduled, for June 9, 2006 and August 7, 2006, respectively, and 

believes that these dates are realistic, even in view of the above stipulated dates. 

Underwriters believe that maintaining the current pre-trial conference and trial dates 

is unrealistic in view of the above stipulated pre-trial dates and Underwriters requests 

pre-trial conference and trial dates of August 30, 2006 and October 4, 2006, 

respectively. The parties, therefore, respectfully request the Court to consider the 

dates for the pre-trial conference and trial at the hearing as scheduled on March 1, 

2006. 

This Stipulation is not entered into for the purpose of delay. 

Dated: February __, 2006 LONNIE E. WOOLVERTON 

JOHN L. VIOLA 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

By 

John L. Viola 

Attorneys for OEA, INC. 

Dated: February __, 2006 ANDREW T. HOUGHTON 

CONDON & FORSYTH LLP 

By 

Andrew T. Houghton 

Attorneys for CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS 

FOR LLOYD’S OF LONDON, ET AL. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01505-DFL-EFB Document 523 Filed 02/02/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

LA #388548 v1/816790-21 -3- CASE NO.: CIV02-1505-DFL-PAN 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING 

DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL CUT-OFF DATES

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 2/1/2006 

 /s/ David F. Levi 

The Honorable David F. Levi 

United States District Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01505-DFL-EFB Document 523 Filed 02/02/06 Page 4 of 4