Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-01097/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-01097-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JEFFREY E. OSTROW (SBN 213118) 

jostrow@stblaw.com 

MICHAEL H. JOSHI (SBN 302184) 

michael.joshi@stblaw.com 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 251-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 

NOAH M. LEIBOWITZ (Pro Hac Vice) 

nleibowitz@stblaw.com 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

425 Lexington Avenue 

New York, New York 10017 

Telephone: (212) 455-2000 

Facsimile: (212) 455-2502 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INTRI-PLEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NHK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; NHK 

SPRING CO., LTD.; OGAKI SEIKO CO., LTD.;

AND SEIKO HIGH TEC CORP. 

Defendants. 

 Case No. 3:17-cv-01097-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER AMENDING CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

Case 3:17-cv-01097-EMC Document 69 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE - 1 - CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. (“IPT”) and Defendants NHK 

International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., Ltd., Ogaki Seiko Co., Ltd., and Seiko High Tec 

Corp. (collectively “Defendants”) filed their Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement 

on October 16, 2017 (D.I. 66); 

WHEREAS IPT’s Opening Claim Construction Brief is due November 22, 2017; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(1), the parties state that they have been, and 

continue to be, engaged in discussions in an attempt to narrow the areas of disagreement 

regarding the disputed terms for construction, and have agreed to push back the claim 

construction briefing schedule in light of these discussions; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(2), the parties state that they previously extended by 

stipulation the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint but 

that no other time modifications have been made in the case; and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a)(3), the parties state that they do not believe the 

requested time modification will have an effect on the remaining schedule for the case; 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to 

the approval of the Court, that the Claim Construction Schedule (D.I. 58) is amended as follows: 

Event Date Set Forth in Original 

Claim Construction 

Schedule (D.I. 58) 

New Date 

Plaintiff’s Opening Claim 

Construction Brief 

November 22, 2017 December 1, 2017 

Defendants’ Responsive 

Claim Construction Brief 

December 6, 2017 December 15, 2017 

Plaintiff’s Reply Claim 

Construction Brief 

December 13, 2017 December 22, 2017 

Technology Tutorial January 16, 2018 (10:00 a.m.) 

Markman Hearing January 29, 2018 (2:30 p.m.) 

DATED: November 20, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

By: /s/ Jeffrey E. Ostrow 

Jeffrey E. Ostrow (SBN 213118) 

jostrow@stblaw.com 

Michael H. Joshi (SBN 302184) 

Case 3:17-cv-01097-EMC Document 69 Filed 11/21/17 Page 2 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE - 2 - CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

michael.joshi@stblaw.com 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 251-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 

Noah M. Leibowitz (Pro Hac Vice) 

nleibowitz@stblaw.com 

425 Lexington Avenue 

New York, New York 10017 

Telephone: (212) 455-2000 

Facsimile: (212) 455-2502 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DATED: November 20, 2017 SINGULARITY LLP 

By: /s/ Frank L. Bernstein 

 Frank L. Bernstein (State Bar No. 189504) 

 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 610 

 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

 Telephone: (650) 720-4650 

 Facsimile: (650) 720-4662 

 fbernstein@ipsingularity.com 

 Of Counsel: 

 William H. Mandir 

 John F. Rabena 

 Yoshinari Kishimoto 

 Fadi Kiblawi 

 Andrew Ritter 

 Arun Shome 

 Young Sun Kwon 

 SUGHRUE MION, PLLC 

 2100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

 Washington, DC 20037 

 Telephone: (202) 293-7060 

 Facsimile: (202) 293-7860 

 wmandir@sughrue.com 

 jrabena@sughrue.com 

 ykishimoto@sughrue.com 

 fkiblawi@sughrue.com 

 aritter@sughrue.com 

 ashome@sughrue.com 

 ykwon@sughrue.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 3:17-cv-01097-EMC Document 69 Filed 11/21/17 Page 3 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE - 3 - CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING 

Pursuant to the Northern District of California’s Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that all 

signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and 

have authorized the filing. 

DATED: November 20, 2017 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

By: /s/ Jeffrey E. Ostrow 

Jeffrey E. Ostrow (SBN 213118) 

jostrow@stblaw.com 

Michael H. Joshi (SBN 302184) 

michael.joshi@stblaw.com 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 251-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 

Noah M. Leibowitz (Pro Hac Vice) 

nleibowitz@stblaw.com 

425 Lexington Avenue 

New York, New York 10017 

Telephone: (212) 455-2000 

Facsimile: (212) 455-2502 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 3:17-cv-01097-EMC Document 69 Filed 11/21/17 Page 4 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

AMENDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE - 4 - CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01097-EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that that the Claim Construction 

Schedule (D.I. 58) is amended as follows: 

Event Date Set Forth in Original 

Claim Construction 

Schedule (D.I. 58) 

New Date 

Plaintiff’s Opening Claim 

Construction Brief 

November 22, 2017 December 1, 2017 

Defendants’ Responsive 

Claim Construction Brief 

December 6, 2017 December 15, 2017 

Plaintiff’s Reply Claim 

Construction Brief 

December 13, 2017 December 22, 2017 

Technology Tutorial January 16, 2018 (10:00 a.m.) 

Markman Hearing January 29, 2018 (2:30 p.m.) 

DATED: ________________, 2017 

 HON. EDWARD M. CHEN 

 DISTRICT JUDGE 

November 29, 2017 6

13 10:00 am 11/21

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:17-cv-01097-EMC Document 69 Filed 11/21/17 Page 5 of 5