Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00934/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00934-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH A. SHERMAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0934 GEB KJM P

vs.

YOLO COUNTY CHIEF

PROBATION OFFICER, et al., 

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed May 2, 2007, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return

to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. 

On June 21, 2007, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time was granted and he was given an

additional thirty days to submit the necessary forms. That thirty day period has since passed, and

plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

Case 2:06-cv-00934-GEB -KJM Document 25 Filed 08/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 16, 2007. 

2

sher0934.

Case 2:06-cv-00934-GEB -KJM Document 25 Filed 08/17/07 Page 2 of 2