Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-2_13-cv-01084/USCOURTS-alnd-2_13-cv-01084-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HERITAGE BANK OF THE SOUTH, as 

successor to Frontier Bank,

Plaintiff,

v.

JONES & JONES CONSTRUCTION 

LLC, et. al.,

Defendants.

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

Case No.: 2:13-cv-01084-RDP

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 15, 2014, the Magistrate Judge’s Second Report and Recommendation was 

entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the 

recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 23). No objections were filed. 

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge. The court 

further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge that Heritage Bank’s Motion 

for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for Default Judgment (Doc. # 14) be granted and 

that: (1) default be entered in favor of Plaintiff Heritage Bank and against Defendant Jones & 

Jones on the claim for breach of the note; (2) summary judgment be entered in favor of Heritage 

Bank and against Mr. Jones on the breach of guaranty claim; (3) summary judgment be entered 

in favor of the FDIC on any counterclaim asserted by Mr. Jones, and (4) Heritage Bank be 

awarded the attorneys’ fees sought.

A separate order in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered.

FILED

 2014 Sep-02 PM 12:10

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 2:13-cv-01084-RDP Document 25 Filed 09/02/14 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED this September 2, 2014.

_________________________________

R. DAVID PROCTOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:13-cv-01084-RDP Document 25 Filed 09/02/14 Page 2 of 2