Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-01453/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-01453-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

Ex Parte Application to Continue Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order 

Case No. C-07-1453-JF 

#32131 v1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Matthew Franklin Jaksa (CA State Bar No. 248072) 

HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 

Telephone: (415) 268-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 

Email: matt.jaksa@hro.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 

CAPITOL RECORDS, INC.; UMG 

RECORDINGS, INC.; SONY BMG 

MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT; ARISTA 

RECORDS LLC; BMG MUSIC; and 

WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a 

Delaware corporation; SONY BMG MUSIC 

ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general 

partnership; ARISTA RECORDS LLC, a 

Delaware limited liability company; BMG 

MUSIC, a New York general partnership; and 

WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MARILYN POWELL, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C-07-1453-JF 

Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

**E-filed 9/10/07** -----------------

Case 5:07-cv-01453-JF Document 12 Filed 09/10/07 Page 1 of 3
 1 

Ex Parte Application to Continue Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order 

Case No. C-07-1453-JF 

#32131 v1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Plaintiffs hereby request that the Court continue the case management conference currently 

set for September 14, 2007, at 10:30 a.m. to November 16, 2007. Plaintiffs filed the Complaint 

against Defendant on March 13, 2007. Defendant was served with the summons and complaint on 

June 19, 2007, by personal service. Defendant failed to answer or otherwise respond to the 

complaint. The clerk of this Court entered default against Defendant on August 22, 2007. Plaintiffs 

are currently in the process of preparing their motion for default judgment by the Court. A case 

management conference is therefore unnecessary at this time. Plaintiffs therefore request that the 

Court continue the case management conference currently set for September 14, 2007, at 10:30 a.m. 

to November 16, 2007. 

Dated: September 4, 2007 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 

 By: _________/s/ Matthew Franklin Jaksa____

Matthew Franklin Jaksa 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

ORDER

 Good cause having been shown: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Case Management conference currently scheduled for September 

14, 2007, at 10:30 a.m. is hereby continued to November 16, 2007. 

Dated: __________________ By: _______________________________ 

Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

United States District Judge 

9/10/07

Case 5:07-cv-01453-JF Document 12 Filed 09/10/07 Page 2 of 3
 1 

Proof of Service

Case No. C-07-1453-JF 

#32131 v1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

I am employed in the office of Holme Roberts & Owen in San Francisco, California. I am 

over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 560 

Mission Street, 25th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. 

On September 4, 2007, I served the foregoing documents described as: 

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

on the interested party in this action by placing a true and correct copy thereof enclosed in a sealed 

envelope addressed as follows: 

Marilyn Powell 

P.O. Box 1177 

Whiteriver, AZ 85941 

XX BY MAIL: I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and 

processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal 

service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Francisco, California in the 

ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed 

invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for 

mailing in affidavit. 

XX (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this 

court at whose direction the service was made. 

Executed on September 4, 2007 at San Francisco, California. 

________________________

Molly Morris 

Case 5:07-cv-01453-JF Document 12 Filed 09/10/07 Page 3 of 3