Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00285/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00285-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 20:1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Order on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment 

Case No. 1:09-CV-00285-OWW-SMS 

JOHN F. MARTIN, ESQ. (SBN 52618)

CHRISTINE HOPKINS, ESQ. (SBN 240248)

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN F. MARTIN 

A Professional Corporation 

3100 Oak Road, Suite 230 

Post Office Box 5331 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: (925) 937-5433 

Facsimile: (925) 938-5567 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

C.B. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

C.B., a minor, Case No. 1:09-CV-00285-OWW-SMS

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND 

GRANTINGIN IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Date: 2/07/11 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 3 

Hon.: Oliver W. Wanger 

Action filed: 2/13/09 

Trial Date: 05/03/11 

Plaintiff,

v. 

SONORA SCHOOL DISTRICT; KAREN 

SINCLAIR; CITY OF SONORA; CHIEF OF 

POLICE MACE MCINTOSH; OFFICER 

HAL PROCK; DOES 1-10 

Defendants.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment was heard by this Court on February 7, 2011, 

the Honorable Oliver W. Wanger presiding. 

The Court, having read the supporting and opposing papers, and having heard oral 

arguments at the hearing, and good cause appearing, orders as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00285-AWI-SMS Document 112 Filed 03/01/11 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Order on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment 

Case No. 1:09-CV-00285-OWW-SMS 1

1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 causes of action against individual Defendants Hal Prock and Mace McIntosh for 

seizure and use of excessive force in violation of the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution; 

2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 causes of action against municipal Defendant City of Sonora for seizure and use of 

excessive force in violation of the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution; 

3. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s state 

law claims for false imprisonment, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress; 

4. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s claim 

for punitive damages against Defendants Hal Prock and Mace McIntosh; 

5. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s 

claim for punitive damages against Defendant City of Sonora. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 25, 2011 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER

 United States District Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00285-AWI-SMS Document 112 Filed 03/01/11 Page 2 of 2