Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02060/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02060-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENCE MOSES WILLIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2060 DFL GGH PS

vs.

DENNIS FIDDAMENT, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding in this action pro se, filed a motion for summary judgment

on June 30, 2005. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21),

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

The “summary judgment” motion filed by plaintiff appears to be nothing more

than a renewed objection to the undersigned’s authority to hear this action. Regardless of its

contents, plaintiff failed to notice the motion for summary judgment on the undersigned’s law

and motion calendar as required by Local Rule 78-230(b). Because there are outstanding

findings and recommendations which recommend this action be dismissed, plaintiff’s motion

will be vacated pending a district court order addressing the findings and recommendations. 

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-02060-DFL-GGH Document 21 Filed 08/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is

vacated pending a district court order addressing this court’s findings and recommendations of

July 7, 2005.

DATED: 8/10/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:mb

Wilis2060.vac

Case 2:04-cv-02060-DFL-GGH Document 21 Filed 08/10/05 Page 2 of 2