Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02175/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02175-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KHYLE BRISCOE, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2175 FCD GGH P

vs.

A.K. SCRIBNER, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this application

for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 14, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. The parties

have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

by proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-02175-FCD-GGH Document 41 Filed 04/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 14, 2007, are adopted in

full; and

2. Petitioner’s September 15, 2006, motion to amend is granted as to claims 11,

13, 14, 16 to the extent it is based on appellate counsel’s failure to raise claims 13 and 14; the

motion to amend is denied in all other respects; and respondent is ordered to file a response to

the petition within thirty days; petitioner may file a reply within thirty days thereafter.

DATED: April 5, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-02175-FCD-GGH Document 41 Filed 04/05/07 Page 2 of 2