Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-06-31137/USCOURTS-ca5-06-31137-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FIFTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

CHARLES R. FULBRUGE III

CLERK

TEL. 504-310-7700

600 S. MAESTRI PLACE

NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130

August 6, 2007

MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW

Regarding: Fifth Circuit Statement on Petitions for Rehearing or

Rehearing En Banc

No. 06-30946 Chauvin v. State Farm Fire Cslt 

USDC No. 2:06-CV-885

2:06-CV-518

2:05-CV-6888

2:05-CV-6887

2:06-CV-177

2:05-CV-6454 

07-30033 Maziarz v. Auto Club Fam Ins Co

USDC No. 2:06-CV-6211 

----------------------------------------------

Enclosed is a copy of the court's decision. The court has entered

judgment under FED. R. APP. P. 36. (However, the opinion may yet

contain typographical or printing errors which are subject to

correction.)

FED. R. APP. P. 39 through 41, and 5TH CIR. RULES 35, 39, and 41 govern

costs, rehearings, and mandates. 5TH CIR. RULES 35 and 40 require you to

attach to your petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc an

unmarked copy of the court's opinion or order. Please read carefully

the Internal Operating Procedures (IOP's) following FED. R. APP. P. 40

and 5TH CIR. R. 35 for a discussion of when a rehearing may be

appropriate, the legal standards applied and sanctions which may be

imposed if you make a nonmeritorious petition for rehearing en banc.

Direct Criminal Appeals. 5TH CIR. R. 41 provides that a motion for a

stay of mandate under FED. R. APP. P. 41 will not be granted simply

upon request. The petition must set forth good cause for a stay or

clearly demonstrate that a substantial question will be presented to

the Supreme Court. Otherwise, this court may deny the motion and issue

the mandate immediately.

Pro Se Cases. If you were unsuccessful in the district court and/or on

appeal, and are considering filing a petition for certiorari in the

United States Supreme Court, you do not need to file a motion for stay

of mandate under FED. R. APP. P. 41. The issuance of the mandate does

not affect the time, or your right, to file with the Supreme Court.

The judgment entered provides that appellants pay to appellees the

costs on appeal.

Sincerely, 

CHARLES R. FULBRUGE III, Clerk

By: 

Jamei Richey, Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

Mr Andre P LaPlace

Mr Jay M Lonero

Mr Sean Patrick Mount

 Case: 06-31137 Document: 0051252826 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2007
Mr Dominic J Ovella

Mr Christopher Raymond Pennison

Mr Daniel Michael Redmann

Mr Gregory M Porobil

Mr Wystan Michael Ackerman

Ms Judy Y Barrasso

Mr Stephen G Bullock

Mr Richard Joseph Doren

Ms Mary Lue Dumestre

Ms Andrea Leigh Fannin

Mr Richard L Fenton

Mr Stephen E Goldman

Mr Ralph S Hubbard III

Mr Wayne J Lee

Ms Heather Shauri Lonian

Mr Daniel Winthrop Nelson

Mr H Minor Pipes III

Mr Harry M Reasoner

Ms Susan M Rogge

Ms Gwendolyn Johnson Samora

Mr Seth Andrew Schmeeckle

Mr Robert I Siegel

Ms Marie Roach Yeates

Mr Remy Voisin Starns

Mr Allan B Berger

Mr William Peter Connick Sr

Mr Bruce L Feingerts

Mr Patrick G Kehoe Jr

Ms Andrea S Lestelle

Mr Terrence J Lestelle

Mr David Allen Parsiola

Mr J Van Robichaux Jr

Mr Jeffery Bryan Struckhoff

Mr Thomas P Anzelmo Sr

Mr William Thomas Barker

Mr David I Bordelon

Mr Levon G Hovnatanian

Mr Kevin P Kamraczewski

Mr Christopher Weldon Martin

Mr Martin R Sadler

Mr Matthew J Ungarino

Mr Allen Helwick Borne Jr

Ms Ginger K DeForest

Mr William Harry Eckert

 Case: 06-31137 Document: 0051252826 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2007