Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03600/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03600-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Wrongful Death

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLIE EAP,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-02301 SI

Related case: C 07-3600 SI

ORDER MODIFYING CASE

MANAGEMENT ORDER

Plaintiffs move to modify the June 10, 2008 Case Management Order because they need

additional time to address defendants’ alleged spoliation of evidence. The Court GRANTS plaintiffs’

motion to modify the schedule. Defendants’ dispositive motion is continued to April 17, 2009 at 9:00

a.m., such that the motion must be filed by March 13, 2009, the opposition by March 27, 2009, and the

reply by April 3, 2009. All depositions shall be completed by February 20, 2009. If plaintiffs wish to

bring a motion regarding the alleged spoliation of evidence, they may make arrangements with Judge

Zimmerman to do so. The Court suggests that such motion be heard no later than February 13, 2009,

to permit the Court to review, if necessary, Judge Zimmerman’s report and recommendations before

deciding defendants’ dispositive motion. 

The Court also notes that defendants have agreed to continue all deadlines for 120 days, subject

to numerous conditions. The Court GRANTS defendants’ request to file two separate briefs in support

of defendants’ dispositive motion, and also agrees that the parties should set a mediation date with Judge

/ / /

Case 3:07-cv-03600-SI Document 80 Filed 09/02/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Infante after the dispositive motion has been briefed but before it is heard. All other requests by

defendants are DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 2, 2008 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-03600-SI Document 80 Filed 09/02/08 Page 2 of 2