Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01071/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01071-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Dr. Guenter Stetter, a citizen of the

foreign state of Germany,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Blackpool, LLC, an Arizona limited

liability company, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-1071-PHX-DGC

ORDER

On July 20, 2009, the Court entered a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) enjoining

Defendants Blackpool, LLC, Burton Gould, and John Bickley IV from transferring or

expending any funds or other assets that constitute proceeds of $350,000 in funds received

from Plaintiff. Dkt. #12 at 3, ¶ 1. The order required Blackpool to provide Plaintiff, by

July 29, 2009, a verified accounting for the funds, “identifying with specificity any transfer

of the funds or the proceeds of those funds, including the name, address, telephone number

and related account number, if any, of each recipient, and the reason and/or consideration,

if any, for any such transfer.” Id. ¶ 5.

A preliminary injunction and order to show cause hearing was held on July 30, 2009.

Dkt. #15. On the basis of that hearing, the Court converted the TRO to a preliminary

injunction and found that Blackpool appeared to be in contempt of Court by failing to

Case 2:09-cv-01071-DGC Document 46 Filed 09/04/09 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

provide the required accounting by July 29, 2009. Dkt. #17 at 3. The Court required

Blackpool to provide a complete accounting by August 3, 2009. Id.

A hearing was held on August 7, 2009 (Dkt. #31) on Defendant Gould’s motion to

dissolve the preliminary injunction (Dkt. #19). The Court denied the motion, concluding that

the accounting was insufficient. Dkt. #32 at 2. The Court amended the preliminary

injunction to set forth additional detail that Defendants must provide to Plaintiff by

August 11, 2009. Id. at 2, 4 ¶ 6.

Plaintiff has filed a motion to amend the order of August 7, 2009. Dkt. #35. No

response has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. See LRCiv 7.2(c). The Court

will grant the motion.

Defendants presented two Wells Fargo bank account statements at the August 7

hearing. Plaintiff asserts that the statements are deficient in that they do not identify the

payee of checks written on the accounts, do not indicate whether the checks had a business

purpose, and fail to reveal whether any checks are properly chargeable to either Plaintiff or

Blackpool. Dkt. #35 at 1. Plaintiff notes similar deficiencies with respect to numerous debits

and cash withdrawals listed on the statements. Id. at 1-2. Plaintiff requests that Defendants

be required to provide the necessary accounting details on a form attached to Plaintiff’s

motion (Dkt. #35-1).

The Court finds Plaintiff’s request to be both reasonable and necessary for a complete

accounting. The Court will therefore grant Plaintiff’s motion and require Defendants to fully

complete the Accounting Details Form (Dkt. #35-1) and provide it to Plaintiff and file it with

the Court before the close of business on September 16, 2009.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to amend Court’s order of August 7, 2009

(Dkt. #35) is granted.

2. Defendants shall fully complete the Accounting Details Form (Dkt. #35-1) and

provide it to Plaintiff and file it with the Court before the close of business on

September 16, 2009.

Case 2:09-cv-01071-DGC Document 46 Filed 09/04/09 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

DATED this 4th day of September, 2009.

Case 2:09-cv-01071-DGC Document 46 Filed 09/04/09 Page 3 of 3