Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03017/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03017-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASSOCIATES OF FAITH and HARVEY

BLIGHT,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

SANTA CLARA, THOMAS ORVIS, STATE

BAR,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-05-3017 MMC

ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO

AMEND COMPLAINT

In an order filed July 29, 2005, the Court dismissed the above-titled action for failure

to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for failure to state a

claim, and granted plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint no later than August 26,

2005. On August 18, 2005, rather than file an amended complaint, plaintiffs filed an appeal

with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On September 21, 2005, the Ninth Circuit

dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

As the deadline for plaintiffs to file an amended complaint expired during the

pendency of their appeal, the Court hereby CONTINUES, to October 14, 2005, the

deadline for plaintiffs to file an amended complaint. If plaintiffs fail to file an amended

/ /

Case 3:05-cv-03017-MMC Document 12 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

complaint by that date, the Court will dismiss the action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 22, 2005 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03017-MMC Document 12 Filed 09/22/05 Page 2 of 2