Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-00276/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-00276-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KELLY B. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

L. CHANZA, C. CRYER, JR, KHUONG 

PHUI, STUART SHERMAN, and 

YAGUEZI,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK (PC)

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULE 260(b)

(Doc. No. 92)

This is counseled prisoner civil rights case. On August 16, 2024, the Court directed 

Defendant to file a statement of undisputed facts, as required by Local Rule 260, and directed 

Plaintiff to comply with Rule 260(b) and “reproduce the itemized facts in the Statement of 

Undisputed Facts” and admit or deny each statement, as appropriate. (See Doc. No. 92). On 

August 19, 2024, Defendants filed the required Statement of Undisputed Facts. (Doc. No. 93). 

On August 29, 2024, Plaintiff filed his own Statement of Undisputed Facts, as permitted by Rule 

260(b), but failed to comply with Rule 260 and the Court’s Order which required him to 

“reproduce the itemized facts in [Defendants’] Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit those 

facts that are undisputed and deny those that are disputed, including with each denial a citation to 

the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or 

other document relied upon in support of that denial.” L.R. 260(b) (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Case 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK Document 95 Filed 08/30/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Within ten (10) days of this Order, Plaintiff shall file an Opposition to Defendants’ 

Statement of Undisputed Facts, in compliance with Local Rule 260(b).

2. If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this Court Order, the Court may impose 

sanctions as appropriate.

Dated: August 30, 2024 

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK Document 95 Filed 08/30/24 Page 2 of 2