Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_19-cv-01485/USCOURTS-cand-5_19-cv-01485-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

62432291v.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAVIER MENDOZA on behalf of himself and 

all other similarly situated employees, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NATIONAL VISION, INC.; and DOES 1 to 

100, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 5:19-cv-01485-SVK 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ANTICIPATED 

SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS 

AND PAGA SETTLEMENT 

Action Filed: November 13, 2018 

FAC Filed: January 22, 2019 

Removal: March 21, 2019 

SAC Filed: July 22, 2019 

Case 5:19-cv-01485-SVK Document 47 Filed 03/13/20 Page 1 of 2
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

62432291v.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Court reviewed the parties Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re: Anticipated Settlement and 

Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class and PAGA Settlement. After participating in a full-day 

mediation on February 19, 2020, the Parties agreed on a settlement in principle and are finalizing the 

terms of their agreement. The Parties are preparing a long-form settlement agreement, pursuant to the 

terms agreed upon at mediation, and requested that the Court allow additional time for the Parties to 

finalize their settlement and move for preliminary approval. The Court finds good cause to grant the 

requested relief, and the Court ORDERS as follows: 

1. Plaintiff shall file his Third Amended Complaint on or before May 8, 2020 and

Defendant is relieved of its obligation to respond while preserving all defenses and the

right to later respond should the proposed class settlement not be approved by the Court;

2. Plaintiff shall notice the hearing on his Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class and

PAGA Settlement to be heard on May 19, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6; and

3. Should the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of the proposed class

settlement on either a motion for preliminary or final approval, and should the parties not

submit a further motion for approval of a revised class settlement in response to such

order, Defendant will have 21 days from the date of such order denying approval to

respond to the Third Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: March 13, 2020 

By: 

JUDGE SUSAN VAN KEULEN 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:19-cv-01485-SVK Document 47 Filed 03/13/20 Page 2 of 2