Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02441/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02441-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 196
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH DEFENDANTS MAY ANSWER OR MAKE MOTION

Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shop, et al. v. Gill

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HARMEET K DHILLON, ESQ. (SBN:207873) 

DAVID LIHWEI LIN, ESQ. (SBN:243448) 

DHILLON & SMITH 

214 Grant Avenue, Suite 400 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Telephone: (415) 433-1700 

Facsimile: (415) 520-6593 

Attorneys for Defendants Sukpran Gill and 

Gurmeet Gill 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISED SHOPS 

LLC and BR IP HOLDER LLC, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SUKPRAN GILL and GURMEET GILL, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C07-02441 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME IN WHICH DEFENDANTS MAY 

RESPOND TO COMPLANT 

Upon review of the Stipulated Request for Order Extending Time in which Defendants 

May Respond to Complaint submitted by the parties, through their respective counsel, and good 

cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERD that Defendants have until July 20, 2007 to respond to 

Plaintiffs’ Complaint. It is further ordered that Defendants have until July 12 to file and serve 

opposition papers to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 

_____________________________________ 

United States District Court Judge 

C07-02441

 

11 7/6/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-02441-PJH Document 13 Filed 07/06/07 Page 1 of 1