Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00804/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00804-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10431.0011/7248459.1 1 3:16-cv-00804-HSG

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LOBEL FINANCIAL CORP.’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

SCOTT J. HYMAN (State Bar No. 148709)

sjh@severson.com

GENEVIEVE R. WALSER-JOLLY (State Bar No. 262784)

grw@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

The Atrium

19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700

Irvine, California 92612

Telephone: (949) 442-7110

Facsimile: (949) 442-7118

MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)

mdl@severson.com

REBECCA S. SAELAO (State Bar No. 222731)

rss@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-3344

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439

Attorneys for Defendant

LOBEL FINANCIAL CORP.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DANIEL GLANTZ, on Behalf of Himself and 

all Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LOBEL FINANCIAL CORP.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:16-cv-00804-HSG

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LOBEL 

FINANCIAL CORP.’S DEADLINE TO 

RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Action Filed: February 17, 2016

Trial Date: None Set

Case 4:16-cv-00804-HSG Document 16 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10431.0011/7248459.1 1 3:16-cv-00804-HSG

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LOBEL FINANCIAL CORP.’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

COMES NOW THE PARTIES TO THE ABOVE-REFERENCED ACTION AND 

RECITE AND STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. WHEREAS, on February 22, 2016, Defendant Lobel Financial Corp. (“Lobel”) 

was served with the Complaint (see Dkt. No. 7);

2. WHEREAS, the Complaint alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer 

Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. sections 227 et seq. in connection with calls allegedly placed 

to Plaintiff DANIEL GLANTZ’s (“Plaintiff”) cellular telephone. The Complaint also alleges 

violations of the TCPA on behalf of a putative class.

3. WHEREAS, by prior stipulation and order, Lobel’s deadline to respond to the 

Complaint is currently April 13, 2016;

4. WHEREAS, the Parties are discussing early resolution options;

5. WHEREAS, in light of the settlement discussions, the Parties agree that Lobel may 

have through April 27, 2016 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint; and

6. WHEREAS, in the event that Lobel files a responsive motion, as opposed to an 

answer, then the Parties stipulate and request that Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days to oppose 

said motion (i.e. through and including May 27, 2016) and Lobel will subsequently have two (2) 

weeks to file a reply brief (i.e. through and including June 10, 2016).

NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES STIPULATE:

1. That Lobel may have through April 27, 2016 to respond to the complaint; and

2. In the event that Lobel files a responsive motion, as opposed to an answer, then the 

Parties jointly stipulate and request that Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days to oppose said motion 

(i.e. through and including May 27, 2016) and Lobel will subsequently have two (2) weeks to file 

a reply brief (i.e. through and including June 10, 2016).

Case 4:16-cv-00804-HSG Document 16 Filed 04/11/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10431.0011/7248459.1 2 3:16-cv-00804-HSG

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LOBEL FINANCIAL CORP.’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

DATED: April 7, 2016 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

By: /s/ L. Timothy Fisher

L. Timothy Fisher

Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL GLANTZ, on Behalf of 

Himself and all Others Similarly Situated

DATED: April 7, 2016 SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Rebecca S. Saelao

Rebecca S. Saelao

Attorneys for Defendant LOBEL FINANCIAL CORP.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, Lobel’s time to answer, move, or otherwise 

respond to the complaint is extended through April 27, 2016. Further, in the event that Lobel files 

a responsive motion, as opposed to an answer, then Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days to oppose 

said motion (i.e. through and including May 27, 2016) and Lobel will subsequently have two (2) 

weeks to file a reply brief (i.e. through and including June 10, 2016).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 11, 2016 

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:16-cv-00804-HSG Document 16 Filed 04/11/16 Page 3 of 3