Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-05232/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-05232-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAN L. WHITNEY, JANET R.

HADLEY, MARGARET A. KORNOWBROWN, ERIC BRELLE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CHARLES WURTZ, VERISCAPE, INC.,

RENEE TADLOCK, REGINA

RYGELIS, WILL ARNTZ, SAM

JACOBS, GARY BERKOWITS, BRIAN

ROE and DOES 1-20,

Defendants. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 04-5232 PVT

ORDER VACATING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

REFERRING CASE FOR FURTHER

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; AND

EXTENDING CERTAIN DATES

On May 18, 2007, the court scheduled a Further Case Management Conference on June

12, 2007. Civil Local Rule 16-10(d) provides: 

Unless otherwise ordered, no fewer than 10 days before any subsequent case

management conference, the parties must file a Joint Case Management

Statement, reporting progress or changes since the last statement was filed and

making proposals for the remainder of the case development process. Such

statements must report the parties’ views about whether using some form of ADR

would be appropriate.

Civ. L.R. 16-10(d). Ten days prior to June 12, 2007 was June 2, 2007, which was a Saturday,

making the joint statement due June 4, 2007. Plaintiff filed a separate statement on June 6, 2007. 

Case 5:04-cv-05232-PVT Document 263 Filed 06/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

Defendants filed a separate statement on June 8, 2007. Neither statement addressed the failure to

file a joint statement. Neither statement provided any specific dates for any extensions sought. 

Neither statement addressed any view on any additional alternative dispute resolution. 

Due to the parties’ failure to comply with the local rules and failure to communicate with

each other or the court in a meaningful manner, It Is Hereby Ordered that:

1. The Case Management Conference set for June 12, 2007 is VACATED;

and

2. The parties are referred to a further settlement conference in front of Judge

Seeborg to take place no later than July 31, 2007. No later than June 15,

2007, the parties are to contact Judge Seeborg’s chambers at 408-535-

5357 with three mutually available dates for the settlement conference.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: The following deadlines are extended as follows:

Last Day to File Motions in Limine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 11, 2007

Last Day to File Oppositions to Motions in Limine . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 18, 2007

Final Pretrial Conference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2:00 P.M. on September 25, 2007

Trial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9:30 A.M. on October 15, 2007

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: June 11, 2007

____________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:04-cv-05232-PVT Document 263 Filed 06/11/07 Page 2 of 2