Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01311/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01311-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN E. WEST, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

JAMES YATES, et al., )

)

)

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:05-cv-01311-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER WITHDRAWING ORDER TO

SUBMIT NEW IN FORMA PAUPERIS

APPLICATION (Doc. 7)

On October 19, 2005, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254 in this Court.

On November 23, 2005, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed because the

petition did not state grounds that would entitle Petitioner to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

(Doc. 6). This Report and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections were to be filed within thirty days from the date of service of that order. To date,

the parties have not filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Case 1:05-cv-01311-AWI-TAG Document 8 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed November 23, 2005 (Doc. 6) is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; 

3. The order of February 6, 2006, requiring Petitioner to submit a new application to

proceed in forma pauperis is hereby WITHDRAWN; 

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a civil rights complaint form;

and

5. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the file. This order terminates the

action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 22, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01311-AWI-TAG Document 8 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 2