Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-03698/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-03698-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JIAHAO KUANG, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 18-cv-03698-JST

ORDER SETTING CASE 

MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE

Re: ECF No. 96

Before the Court is the parties’ stipulated proposed case management schedule, which also 

presents two discovery disputes for the Court to resolve. ECF No. 96. The Court DENIES 

Defendants’ request to limit the number of depositions to four. See id. at 2 n.2. The Court 

DECLINES to address the parties’ dispute regarding supplementation of the administrative record 

as it is not yet ripe. See id. at 2 n.1. Finally, the Court ADOPTS the parties’ proposed schedule 

and sets the following deadlines:

Event Deadline

Substantial completion of document production May 1, 2019

Submission of final interrogatories and requests for admissions June 3, 2019

Fact discovery cut-off July 3, 2019

Expert disclosures July 19, 2019

Expert rebuttal August 19, 2019

Case 3:18-cv-03698-JST Document 101 Filed 02/11/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Expert discovery cut-off September 6, 2019

Deadline to file notice or seek leave to supplement the 

administrative record September 8, 2019

Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment due October 4, 2019

Defendants’ opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment

due October 25, 2019

Plaintiffs’ reply in support of summary judgment and opposition 

to Defendants’ cross-motion due November 15, 2019

Defendants’ reply in support of cross-motion for summary 

judgment due December 6, 2019

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and comply with all applicable deadlines. All counsel must arrange their calendars to 

accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2019

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:18-cv-03698-JST Document 101 Filed 02/11/19 Page 2 of 2