Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923-49/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

DOCUMENTS RE MAGMA’S REPLY TO EVID. OBJ. 

C-04-03923 MMC

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) – griley@omm.com

MARK E. MILLER (S.B. #130200) – markmiller@omm.com

PETER OBSTLER (S.B. #171623) – pobstler@omm.com

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO (S.B. #208606) – ccatalano@omm.com

LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) – lsimmons@omm.com 

NORA M. PUCKETT (pro hac vice) – npuckett@omm.com

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation,

Plaintiff, 

v.

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, 

INC., a Delaware Corporation, AND 

LUKAS VAN GINNEKEN, 

Defendants.

Case No. C04-03923 MMC 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5 

CERTAIN DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN 

SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT MAGMA 

DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.’S REPLY 

TO SYNOPSYS, INC.’S EVIDENTIARY 

OBJECTIONS 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Magma Design Automation, Inc. (“Magma”) hereby moves pursuant to Civil Local Rule 

79-5 for leave to file under seal (1) Defendant Magma Design Automation, Inc.’s Reply to 

Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s Evidentiary Objections “(“Magma’s Reply”); and (2) exhibits 1 and 2 

to the Declaration of Nora M. Puckett in Support of Magma’s Reply to Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s 

Evidentiary Objections (“Puckett Declaration”). 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 827 Filed 12/06/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 - 2 - 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

DOCUMENTS RE MAGMA’S REPLY TO EVID. OBJ. 

C-04-03923 MMC

Magma’s Reply relies in part on testimony that contain confidential business, trade secret 

or personal identifying information or have been designated as confidential under a Stipulated 

Protective Order. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, and a Stipulated Protective Order with 

third party International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), Magma seeks to file the 

following documents and testimony under seal: 

1. Portions of Magma’s Reply contain Magma’s, Synopsys’s and/or IBM’s 

confidential business, trade secret or personal identifying information and are properly sealable. 

2. Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Puckett Declaration contain confidential business or trade 

secret information of Synopsys and/or IBM and are properly sealable. 

 Accordingly, this motion is made on the grounds that portions of Magma’s Reply to 

Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s Evidentiary Objections and Exhibit 1 and 2 to the Puckett Declaration 

contain confidential business, trade secret or personal identifying information or have been 

designated confidential and are properly sealable. 

Dated: December 1, 2005 GEORGE A. RILEY 

MARK E. MILLER 

PETER OBSTLER 

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO 

LUANN L. SIMMONS 

NORA M. PUCKETT 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Nora M. Puckett 

Nora M. Puckett 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 827 Filed 12/06/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 - 3 - 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

DOCUMENTS RE MAGMA’S REPLY TO EVID. OBJ. 

C-04-03923 MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Having considered Magma Design Automation, Inc.’s Administrative Motion for Leave to 

File Under Seal Certain Documents Submitted in Support of Its Reply to Plaintiff Synopsys, 

Inc.’s Evidentiary Objections, and all other supporting and opposing arguments and papers, and 

finding good cause, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, Magma’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File 

Under Seal: 

(a) the portions of Magma’s Reply to Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s Evidentiary Objections 

containing Magma’s, Synopsys’s and/or IBM’s confidential business, trade secret or 

personal identifying information; 

(b) Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Declaration of Nora M. Puckett in Support of Magma’s Reply 

to Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s Evidentiary Objections containing Synopsys’s, and/or IBM’s 

confidential business or trade secret information; 

is GRANTED, and the aforementioned exhibits, portions of Magma’s Reply to Plaintiff 

Synopsys, Inc.’s Evidentiary Objections and Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Declaration of Nora 

M. Puckett in Support of Magma’s Reply to Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s Evidentiary 

Objections will be filed under seal. 

Dated: 

 ________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SF1:610144.1

December 6, 2005

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 827 Filed 12/06/05 Page 3 of 3