Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02829/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02829-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DARREL L. ESPINOSA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WHITEPAGE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation dba whitepages.com, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:14-cv-2829-MCE-EFB PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 

undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On February 20, 

2015, the court ordered plaintiff to file within 14 days a declaration comply with the pre-filing 

review order issued in Espinosa v. Marshall, 2:06-cv-1192-MCE-GGH PS, ECF No. 92. Plaintiff 

was admonished that failure to comply with the February 20, 2015 order would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

 The deadline has passed and plaintiff has not filed a declaration in compliance with the 

pre-filing review order. 

///// 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:14-cv-02829-MCE-EFB Document 31 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the 

Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: March 11, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-02829-MCE-EFB Document 31 Filed 03/12/15 Page 2 of 2