Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00987/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00987-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On July 30, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation seeking to dismiss the action. (Doc. 24) The 

stipulation relies upon Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which “the plaintiff may 

dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party 

serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by 

all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been filed, an 

order of the Court is not required to effectuate the dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. 

City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 

///

///

///

///

///

ARTHUR GRAY,

 Plaintiff,

v.

1000 PACHECO ROAD APARTMENTS, 

LLC., 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00987

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT 

TO CLOSE THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO THE 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

(Doc. 24)

Case 1:14-cv-00987-JLT Document 25 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice of dismissal 

with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00987-JLT Document 25 Filed 07/31/15 Page 2 of 2