Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03577/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03577-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

EVELYN ROSA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF SEASIDE, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 05-3577 JF (PVT)

ORDER RE PARTIES’ PROPOSED

FORM OF PROTECTIVE ORDER

The parties have filed a proposed protective order that covers only the handling of certain law

enforcement agency records.1 Based on the proposed form of order and the file herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than January 5, 2007, the parties shall submit a

proposed form of protective order that covers the handling of any documents produced or exchanged

by the parties which contain information that qualifies for protection under standards developed

under F.R.Civ.P. 26(c). The court encourages to use the model form of protective order which is

available in the “Forms” section of the court’s website (www.cand.uscourts.gov) to guide their

drafting of the protective order. If there is any possibility that a party may wish to designate any

documents for “attorneys eyes only” at any time during this litigation, the parties should include such

Case 5:05-cv-03577-JF Document 94 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

a provision in the form of protective order now.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending entry of the protective order, the terms set forth in

the parties’ current proposed form of protective order shall govern the handling of any documents a

party designates “Confidential”

Dated: 12/8/06

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:05-cv-03577-JF Document 94 Filed 12/08/06 Page 2 of 2