Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00656/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00656-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAYMAR DODDS,

Plaintiff,

v.

E. LASCANO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00656-AWI-DLB PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO

ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE

(ECF NOS. 17, 18)

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

Plaintiff Jaymar Dodds (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On, November 13, 2009,

the court directed the United States Marshal to initiate service of process on defendants E.

Lascano, J. Hamlin, and B. Williams. The Marshal was unable to locate and serve Defendants E.

Lascano, J. Hamlin, and B. Williams, and on February 1, 2010, the Marshal returned the USM285 forms to the Court.

On March 29, 2010, the Court issued an order to show cause why Defendants E. Lascano

and J. Hamlin should not be dismissed from this action for failure to provide information

sufficient to effect service of process. (ECF Nos. 17, 18.) On April 23, 2010, Plaintiff filed his

response to the order. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff contends that Defendants Lascano and Hamlin no

longer work at Kern Valley State Prison. Plaintiff requests an additional thirty days in which to

gather additional information to assist the United States Marshal in effecting service of process.

Good cause appearing, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff’s request for

additional time to respond to the Court’s orders, ECF Nos. 17 and 18, is GRANTED. Plaintiff is

1

Case 1:09-cv-00656-AWI-DLB Document 21 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

granted an additional thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order in which to file a

response. Failure to file a timely response or to provide sufficient information will result in a

recommendation of dismissal of Defendants Lascano and Hamlin.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 24, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

77e0d6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-00656-AWI-DLB Document 21 Filed 06/25/10 Page 2 of 2