Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01726/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01726-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

RONALD L. PRONECHEN, ) 

 )

 Plaintiff, )

 )

 )

 v. )

 )

 )

SECRETARY OF U.S. )

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND )

SECURITY ) 

 )

 Defendant. )

 )

________________________)

2:06-cv-1726-LEW

ORDER 

Currently before this Court is Defendant’s Motion

to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Having considered all

papers and arguments, THE COURT NOW FINDS AND RULES AS

FOLLOWS:

//

//

Case 2:06-cv-01726-LEW Document 57 Filed 06/13/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

As a preliminary matter, this Court GRANTS

Defendant’s request for judicial notice as to all

documents. 

The Amended Complaint sufficiently alleges a claim

for violation of Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

Moreover, Plaintiff’s claims are not barred by

statute of limitations because the Amended Complaint

relates back to the original complaint.

Therefore, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to

Dismiss Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW

 Senior U.S. District Judge

DATED: June 13, 2008

Case 2:06-cv-01726-LEW Document 57 Filed 06/13/08 Page 2 of 2