Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05659/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05659-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING LITIGATION 

CV 09-05659 WHA 

DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003) 

dsnyder@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

RYAN K. YAGURA (S.B. #197619) 

ryagura@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

400 South Hope Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899 

Telephone: (213) 430-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., BEST 

DATA PRODUCTS INC. D/B/A DIAMOND 

MULTIMEDIA, and XFX TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY 

CORPORATION and RICHTEK USA, 

INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

uPI SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION, ADVANCED MICRO 

DEVICES, INC., SAPPHIRE 

TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, BEST DATA 

PRODUCTS INC. D/B/A DIAMOND 

MULTIMEDIA, and XFX 

TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. CV 09-05659 WHA 

[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING 

LITIGATION PENDING OUTCOME OF 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION INVESTIGATION 

Case3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document21-2 Filed01/15/10 Page1 of 2 Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 22 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 1 - [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING LITIGATION 

CV 09-05659 WHA 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, THE COURT ORDERS AS 

FOLLOWS: 

1. The above-captioned action, Richtek Technology Corporation and Richtek 

USA, Inc. v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. CV 09-05659 

WHA, currently pending before this Court shall be stayed until the 

determination of the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) 

of its investigation in the matter of Certain DC-DC Controllers and 

Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-698 becomes final. 

2. The parties shall notify the Court of the ITC’s final determination within 

10 days of such determination 

Dated: January _____, 2010 

Hon. William H. Alsup 

U.S. District Judge 

 

SF1:786090.1 

Case3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document21-2 Filed01/15/10 Page2 of 2

19

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 22 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 2