Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-00409/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-00409-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 10cv409

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARMEN SOSA PANTOJA,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 10CV409DMS (BLM)

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

vs. DISMISS AS MOOT

MYLOR FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Presently before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Bank of America

Corporation and Bank of America Home Loans Servicing, LLP. (Doc. 5.) Instead of opposing,

Plaintiffs have filed a First Amended Complaint. A party is entitled to amend pleadings once “as a

matter of course” at any time before a responsive pleading is served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a);see Shaver

v. Operating Eng'rs Local 428 Pension Trust Fund, 332 F.3d 1198, 1201 (9th Cir. 2003) (motion to

dismiss is not a responsive pleading). Because Plaintiffs’ amended pleading supersedes the original

complaint, the original is no longer operative. Bullen v. De Bretteville, 239 F.2d 824, 833 (9th Cir.

1956). Defendant’s motion is therefore denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 30, 2010

HON. DANA M. SABRAW

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-00409-DMS-BLM Document 7 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 1