Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01252/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01252-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

83459827v2 1. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE SCHEDULE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE DEADLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN HALEY and SYLVIA

THOMPSON, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

MACY’S, INC. and

BLOOMINGDALE’S, INC.,

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE 

SCHEDULE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE DEADLINE

Case No. 3:15-cv-06033-HSG

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

TODD BENSON, on behalf of himself and all 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MACY’S, INC., MACY’S WEST STORIES, 

INC., and BLOOMINGDALE’S, INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:16-cv-01252-HSG 

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

ZOHREH FARHANG, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

MACY’S, INC., MACY’S WEST STORES, 

INC. and BLOOMINGDALE’S, INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02850-HSG

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Case 4:16-cv-01252-HSG Document 13 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

83459827v2 2. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE SCHEDULE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE DEADLINE

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED. Good 

cause shown, 

(1) Defendants need not respond to the original Complaints in Haley, Benson, or 

Farhang until after Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate is decided; if Plaintiffs are granted leave to 

file a Consolidated Complaint, Defendants’ deadline to respond to that Consolidated Complaint 

shall be 30 days after the Consolidated Complaint is filed; if, alternatively, Plaintiffs’ Motion to 

Consolidate is denied, Defendants shall respond to the original Complaints within 30 days of the 

Court’s order denying Plaintiffs’ motion. 

(2) The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for August 30, 2016 in 

Benson and Farhang shall be continued until after Defendants file their responsive pleadings 

(whether to the original Complaints or a Consolidated Complaint), and, if Defendants respond with 

a motion to dismiss, until after that motion is fully briefed and decided.

DATED: July 1, 2016 ___________________________________

HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Court Judge

Case 4:16-cv-01252-HSG Document 13 Filed 07/01/16 Page 2 of 2