Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00932/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00932-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONT. TIME FOR AT&T’S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT;

CASE NO. 10-CV-00932 (PVT)

DARRYL M. WOO (CSB NO. 100513)

dwoo@fenwick.com

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO. 168633)

vdemarchi@fenwick.com

MICHELLE CAI (CSB NO. 238838)

mcai@fenwick.com

FENWICK & WEST LLP

555 California Street, 12th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 875-2300

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

YMAX CORPORATION, YMAX 

COMMUNICATIONS CORP., MAGICJACK LP, 

TIGER JET NETWORKS, INC., and STRATUS 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

YMAX CORPORATION, YMAX 

COMMUNICATIONS CORP., 

MAGICJACK LP, TIGER JET 

NETWORKS, INC., and STRATUS 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AT&T CORP.,

Defendant.

Case No. 10 CV 00932 (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT AT&T CORP.’S RESPONSE 

TO COMPLAINT 

Local Rule 6-1

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs YMax Corporation, YMax Communications Corp., Magicjack LP, 

Tiger Jet Networks, Inc. and Stratus Telecommunications LLC filed a complaint on March 4, 

2010. Defendant AT&T Corp. was served with the complaint.

WHEREAS, upon request by counsel for Defendant AT&T Corp., the parties have 

conferred and agreed to extend the time for Defendant AT&T Corp. to answer or otherwise 

respond to the complaint.

XXXXXXXXXXXXX

Case 4:10-cv-00932-PJH Document 13 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONT. TIME FOR AT&T’S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT;

CASE NO. 10-CV-00932 (PVT) 2

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate that Defendant AT&T Corp.’s 

time to respond to the complaint is continued until April 16, 2010.

Dated: March 22, 2010 FENWICK & WEST LLP

By: s/Virginia K. DeMarchi

Virginia K. DeMarchi

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

YMAX CORPORATION, YMAX 

COMMUNICATIONS CORP., MAGICJACK LP, 

TIGER JET NETWORKS, INC., and STRATUS 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS LLC

Dated: March 22, 2010 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

By: s/David A. Jokopin

David A. Jokopin

State Bar No. 209,950

2475 Hanover Street

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1114

(650) 233-4790 (Telephone)

(650) 233-4545 (Facsimile)

David.Jakopin@pillsburylaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant

AT&T CORP.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

I, Virginia K. DeMarchi, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from the other signatory.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on 

March 22, 2010.

By: s/Virginia K. DeMarchi

Virginia K. DeMarchi

Case 4:10-cv-00932-PJH Document 13 Filed 03/23/10 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONT. TIME FOR AT&T’S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT;

CASE NO. 10-CV-00932 (PVT) 3

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation and finding good cause therefore, 

hereby orders:

1. Defendant AT&T Corp.’s time to respond to the complaint is continued until 

April 16, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: By: 

United States District Court Judge

March 23, 2010

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 

Magistrate Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00932-PJH Document 13 Filed 03/23/10 Page 3 of 3