Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04871/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04871-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REQUEST TO REMOVE JOSHUA H. LERNER AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C 03-04871 JW 

357285.01

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 

LEO L. LAM - #181861 

EUGENE M. PAIGE - #202849 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant 

PIXART IMAGING, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

PIXART IMAGING, INC., a Taiwanese 

corporation,

Plaintiff, 

v.

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, 

Defendant.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

Case No. C 03-04871 JW 

REQUEST TO REMOVE JOSHUA H. 

LERNER AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 109 Filed 08/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

REQUEST TO REMOVE JOSHUA H. LERNER AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C 03-04871 JW 

357285.01

This is to inform the Court that Joshua H. Lerner, formerly an associate with Keker & 

Van Nest, is no longer an employee of Keker & Van Nest. Mr. Lerner is now an attorney at 

Clarence & Dyer LLP and therefore no longer represents Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant 

PIXART IMAGING, INC. Keker & Van Nest and Daralyn J. Durie, Leo L. Lam, and Eugene 

M. Paige remain counsel of record for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant PIXART 

IMAGING, INC. Accordingly, Keker & Van Nest hereby requests that the parties and the Court 

remove Mr. Lerner from their notice lists for the above-captioned case, and that the Court 

execute the attached Proposed Order. 

Dated: August 23, 2005 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ Daralyn J. Durie_____________

DARALYN J. DURIE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim-Defendant 

PIXART IMAGING, INC. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby GRANTS counsel, Keker & Van 

Nest’s request that the parties and the Court remove Mr. Lerner from their notice lists for the 

above-captioned case. 

Dated: _____________ 

____________________________

HONORABLE JAMES WARE 

United States Judge 

/s/ James Ware

8/25/05

Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 109 Filed 08/25/05 Page 2 of 2