Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05932/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05932-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL PADDOCK,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:04-cv-05932-OWW-SMS PC

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. 56)

Plaintiff Michael Paddock (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1 (Religious Land Use and

Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000). On November 6, 2006, defendants Woodford and MendozaPowers (“defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment. More than twenty-one days have

passed and plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local

Rule 78-230(m).

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file an

opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion for summary

judgment; and

///

///

///

///

Case 1:04-cv-05932-OWW -SMS Document 58 Filed 01/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. If plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed, with

prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05932-OWW -SMS Document 58 Filed 01/26/07 Page 2 of 2