Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00148/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00148-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELVIN JONES, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN HOLLENBACK, et al.,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:05-cv-0148 OWW DLB

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE ORDER

I. Date of Scheduling Conference.

March 2, 2006.

II. Appearances Of Counsel.

Melvin Jones, Jr., appeared pro se. 

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth by Daniel

Wainwright, Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendant John

Hollenback. 

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth by William

Littlewood, Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendant Leslie Jensen.

III. Motion Schedule.

1. The current motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second

Amended Complaint which have been filed by both Defendants shall

be decided on the following schedule. 

Case 1:05-cv-00148-OWW -DLB Document 202 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a. The response of Plaintiff is due on or before

March 27, 2006. The Defendants’ reply to Plaintiff’s response is

due April 3, 2006. 

b. Defendants shall have to and including March 16,

2006, to file any opposition to the purported filing of a Third

Amended Complaint by the Plaintiff.

c. The Plaintiff shall have until on or before March

27, 2006, to respond to any objections to the Third Amended

Complaint.

d. All motions shall be heard on April 17, 2006, at

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3. 

2. There is currently set for hearing on March 27, 2006,

before this Court, a motion to recuse Magistrate Judge Beck and a

motion for protective order.

3. After discussion among the parties, it is agreed:

a. The Plaintiff will voluntarily take the motion for

protective off calendar for hearing on March 27, 2006, without

prejudice to renewing that motion. 

b. On or before March 9, 2006, Plaintiff will

determine whether the recusal motion addressed to the Magistrate

Judge is properly set before the District Court or in the

Magistrate Judge court. At that time, if it is determined that

the proper forum for the hearing of that motion is the District

Court, the recusal motion will also be heard on April 17, 2006,

at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3. Any opposition to the motion shall

be filed by April 3, 2006. 

c. In the event that the proper place for hearing of

the Magistrate Judge recusal motion is before the Magistrate

Case 1:05-cv-00148-OWW -DLB Document 202 Filed 03/06/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Judge, Plaintiff will contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk for the

Magistrate Judge and arrange a hearing date for the recusal

motion. 

4. The current trial date and remaining schedule for this

case is hereby vacated. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 2, 2006.

/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER

 

 Oliver W. Wanger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00148-OWW -DLB Document 202 Filed 03/06/06 Page 3 of 3