Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00443/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00443-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION,

INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., JAPAN

TOBACCO INC., JAPAN TOBACCO

INTERNATIONAL U.S.A. INC., EMORY

UNIVERSITY,

Defendants. /

No. C 16-0443 WHA

ORDER RE PAGE LIMITS

FOR BRIEFS ON MOTIONS

TO DISMISS

The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions regarding enargling the page limits on

briefs for the forthcoming motions to dismiss and the possibility of omnibus briefs. 

The page limits shall be as follows:

• Gilead’s motion: 30 PAGES.

• Other motions: 25 PAGES.

• AIDS Healthcare’s omnibus opposition: 60 PAGES.

• Gilead’s reply: 18 PAGES.

• Other replies: 15 PAGES.

To be clear, defendants may not file an omnibus reply. AIDS Healthcare should be clear

which arguments address which defendants, and defendants need only reply to the arguments

directed at them. If the total length of defendants’ briefs substantially exceeds the sixty pages

Case 3:16-cv-00443-WHA Document 73 Filed 05/12/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

claimed in their joint statement, the Court will entertain a request for a further enlargement of

AIDS Healthcare’s page limit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-00443-WHA Document 73 Filed 05/12/16 Page 2 of 2