Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-03098/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-03098-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 PANASONIC CORPORATION, a Japanese

corporation, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 10-03098 JSW

ORDER RE DEADLINE TO RESPOND

TO OPERATIVE COMPLAINT

The Court has received the motion of Defendants Panasonic Corporation and SD-3C LLC for

administrative relief regarding the time to answer Samsung’s Third or Fourth Amended Complaint

(Docket No. 168). The Court is disappointed that the parties were unable to resolve this issue

without assistance from this Court, and also disappointed by the timing of the motion.

To resolve any ambiguity in the September 30, 2015 Order, the Court hereby CLARIFIES,

sua sponte, that Defendants’ deadline to respond to Samsung’s operative Complaint is November 4,

2015, or fourteen days after Samsung files its Fourth Amended Complaint, whichever is earlier.

In light of this sua sponte clarification, Defendants’ administrative motion (Docket No. 168)

is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 14, 2015 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:10-cv-03098-JSW Document 170 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 1