Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02710/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02710-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSICA HOLMES,

Petitioner,

v.

DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, Warden,

Respondent.

No. 2:11-cv-2710 JKS KJN P (TEMP)

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a petition for a writ of 

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. An evidentiary hearing is set in this matter on 

August 22, 2016, on petitioner’s claim that her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance during 

the plea bargain process. On March 30, 2016, this court issued an order which, among other 

things, set a status conference and proposed a protective order to be issued in connection with the 

production of discovery in this case. The parties were advised to be prepared at the status 

conference to discuss changes, if any, to the language of the court’s proposed protective order. 

The status hearing was later taken off calendar on the court’s own motion. 

On May 19, 2016, petitioner filed a “request for protective order.” Therein, she requests 

that the court issue a protective order with respect to documents in her trial counsel’s file before 

she turns those documents over to respondent in discovery. Petitioner has attached a proposed

protective order of her own. Previously in this case, respondent’s counsel objected to the 

Case 2:11-cv-02710-JKS-KJN Document 74 Filed 06/03/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

language of petitioner’s proposed protective order. Good cause appearing, the parties will be 

ordered to meet and confer on the language of a protective order to be issued in this case. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, within seven days from the filed date of this order, 

the parties shall meet and confer and shall file a proposed protective order to be issued by the 

court in connection with discovery in this case. If the parties are unable to agree on the language 

of a protective order, they shall file a stipulation with this court in which they address each line 

of the court’s proposed protective order and explain, with legal and factual citations, why they 

object to the language of the court’s proposed order.

Dated: June 3, 2016

Case 2:11-cv-02710-JKS-KJN Document 74 Filed 06/03/16 Page 2 of 2