Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00953/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00953-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL CHRISTAKIS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

1:06-CV-0953 AWI GSA

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

ADDITIONAL TIME TO FILE

AN OPPOSITION

(Document #20)

This action was originally filed in the United States District Court for the District of

Columbia. This action was later transferred to this court. The operative pleading appears to be

an amended complaint filed in the District of Columbia on February 23, 2006. This pleading

appears to be a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to the Administrative

Procedure Act.

On November 15, 2007, Defendant filed a document entitled an answer by motion to

dismiss. A review of this document reveals that it is a motion to dismiss. When Plaintiff did

not file any opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion, on January 29,

2008 the court directed Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant’s motion.

On February 20, 2008, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file an opposition

to Defendant’s motion. Plaintiff states that he was not served with a copy of Defendant’s

motion to dismiss until February 13, 2008. Good cause having been presented to the court,

Plaintiff’s motion will be granted.

Case 1:06-cv-00953-AWI-GSA Document 21 Filed 02/22/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Accordingly, the court ORDERS that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff shall file any opposition to Defendant’s November 15, 2007 motion to

dismiss by March 24, 2008; 

3. Defendant shall file any reply brief by April 7, 2008; and

4. Plaintiff is FOREWARNED that failure to file any opposition or other response

may result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 22, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00953-AWI-GSA Document 21 Filed 02/22/08 Page 2 of 2