Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01604/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01604-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL—No. C-05-01604 RMW

JAH

E-FILED on 6/15/06

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

TODD S. GLASSEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMANO CORPORATION; MARK

WILLIAMS; HUDSON VENTURE

PARTNERS, L.P.; JAY GOLDBERG; THE

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS

AND TECHNOLOGIES; and A. FRANCIS

ACKER;

Defendants.

No. C-05-01604 RMW

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

[Re Docket Nos. 187, 188]

On March 31, 2006, the court dismissed plaintiff Toddy Glassey's operative complaint. In

response to various motions, the court on May 18, 2006 denied Glassey's motion for reconsideration

of the March 31, 2006 order and instructed Glassey, if he wished to continue in this forum, to file a

either an amended complaint or a motion for leave to amend his complaint by June 1, 2006. 

Since the May 18, 2006 order issued, Glassey has made two filings. Even construing both

liberally, neither can be reasonably interpreted as an amended complaint or a motion for leave to

amend. Each is, in essence, yet more argument by Glassey why this court should reconsider its

March 31, 2006 order. Glassey presents arguments regarding the scope of the release between

Case 5:05-cv-01604-RMW Document 189 Filed 06/15/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL—No. C-05-01604 RMW

JAH 2

himself and defendants Hudson Venture Partners, L.P, Jay Goldberg, and Mark Williams; the scope

of his arbitration with defendant Amano Corporation; and his standing as plaintiff. All of these

issues were addressed in the March 31, 2006 order.

As Glassey has not filed an amended complaint or a motion for leave to amend, the court will

enter judgment in favor of all defendants in this action.

DATED: 6/13/06

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01604-RMW Document 189 Filed 06/15/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL—No. C-05-01604 RMW

JAH 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Plaintiff (pro se):

Todd S. Glassey todd.glassey@att.net 

Counsel for Defendants:

Peter L. Isola peterisola@dwt.com 

Salle E. Yoo salleyoo@dwt.com 

Mark Williams (pro se)

Andrea L. Courtney andrea.courtney@pillsburylaw.com 

Mark St. Angelo mark.st.angelo@usdoj.gov 

Joann M. Swanson joann.swanson@usdoj.gov 

Kevin V. Ryan 

A. Francis Acker (pro se)

Chinhayi J. Coleman chinhayi.j.coleman@usdoj.gov 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 6/15/06 /s/ JH

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:05-cv-01604-RMW Document 189 Filed 06/15/06 Page 3 of 3