Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05145/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05145-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Oracle USA Inc. v. Oracle Surveillance Systems, Ltd.

Case No. C-04-05145 CRB

84078276_1

Noel M. Cook (SB No. 122777)

OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, P.C.

455 Market Street

19th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

(415) 882-3200

Michael F. Sarney

Samson Helfgott

KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP

575 Madison Avenue

New York, New York 10022

(212) 940-8800

Attorneys for Oracle Surveillance Systems, Ltd.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

____________________________________

ORACLE USA, INC., a Colorado )

Corporation and ORACLE )

INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a )

California corporation, )

)

Plaintiffs, ) Case No. C 04 5145 (CRB)

)

v. )

) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

ORACLE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, ) RESCHEDULING SETTLEMENT

LTD., a Maryland corporation, ) CONFERENCE

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

The parties have received the Court’s Order dated September 19, 2005, setting a settlement

conference for October 18, 2005.

Because this date conflicts with the holiday of Sukkot, which is observed by defendant’s

principal, Michael Rogers, the parties respectfully request that the settlement conference be

rescheduled for October 28, 2005. Counsel for plaintiffs and defendant have conferred and have

agreed that this date is convenient for all parties. While this date is a Friday, and defendant had

previously requested that the settlement conference not be held on a Friday, since its principal would

then be required to remain in California until after the Sabbath, defendant’s principal is willing to

Case 3:04-cv-05145-CRB Document 29 Filed 09/22/2005 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Oracle USA Inc. v. Oracle Surveillance Systems, Ltd.

Case No. C-04-05145 CRB

84078276_1

2

proceed on a Friday and remain in California, in the interest of holding the settlement conference

sooner rather than later.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter the attached Proposed Order

setting the settlement conference for October 28, 2005.

Dated: September 22, 2005 KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP

By: _/s/Michael F. Sarney_____

Michael F. Sarney

Attorneys for Defendant

Dated: September 22, 2005 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

By: __/s/Gregory S. Gilchrist____

Gregory S. Gilchrist

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 3:04-cv-05145-CRB Document 29 Filed 09/22/2005 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Oracle USA Inc. v. Oracle Surveillance Systems, Ltd.

Case No. C-04-05145 CRB

84078276_1

3

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Good cause appearing, it is Ordered that the settlement conference be held on October 28,

2005 at 9:00 a.m.

Dated: September __, 2005 __________________________

Honorable Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-05145-CRB Document 29 Filed 09/22/2005 Page 3 of 3

 27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman