Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08124/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08124-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Charles Frank Gaunt, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Jail Commander Brown, et al.,

 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-08124-PCT-SMM (LOA)

ORDER

Defendants Wright and Kitchen have filed a Motion to Dismiss, doc. # 25, pursuant

to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute.

NOTICE--WARNING TO PLAINTIFF

A motion to dismiss under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will,

if granted, end your case. 

Additionally, you must comply with the following provisions of Rule 7.2 of the Local

Rules of Civil Procedure:

(e) Length of Motions and Memoranda. Unless otherwise permitted

by the Court, a motion including its supporting memorandum, and the response

including its supporting memorandum, each shall not exceed seventeen (17)

pages, exclusive of attachments and any required statement of facts. Unless

otherwise permitted by the Court, a reply including its supporting

memorandum shall not exceed eleven (11) pages, exclusive of attachments.

. . . .

(i) Briefs or Memoranda of Law; Effect of Non-Compliance. If a

motion does not conform in all substantial respects with the requirements of

this Local Rule, or if the unrepresented party or counsel does not serve and file

Case 3:07-cv-08124-SMM-LOA Document 26 Filed 08/13/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

the required answering memoranda, or if the unrepresented party or counsel

fails to appear at the time and place assigned for oral argument, such

non-compliance may be deemed a consent to the denial or granting of the

motion and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily.

LRCiv 7.2.

You must timely respond to all motions. The Court may, in its discretion, treat your

failure to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as a consent to the granting of that

Motion without further notice, and judgment may be entered dismissing this action without

prejudice pursuant to Rule 7.2(i) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. See Brydges v.

Lewis, 18 F.3d 651 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response to Defendants’ Motion to

Dismiss on or before September 15, 2008.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file a reply within 15 days after

service of Plaintiff’s response.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss will be deemed ready for

decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless

otherwise ordered by the Court.

DATED this 13th day of August, 2007.

Case 3:07-cv-08124-SMM-LOA Document 26 Filed 08/13/08 Page 2 of 2