Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04646/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04646-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER -1- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DOUGLAS R. KERTSCHER, pro hac vice HILL, KERTSCHER & WHARTON 

3350 Riverwood Parkway, Suite 800 

Atlanta, GA 30339 

Telephone: 770-953-0995x102 

Fax: 770-953-1358 

Email: drk@hkw-law.com 

TODD A. NOAH (State Bar No. 152328) 

DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1450 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415-705-6377 

Fax: 415-705-6383 

Email: tnoah@dergnoah.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

SERCONET, LTD. 

James A. DiBoise, State Bar No. 83296 

Jennifer A. Ochs, State Bar No. 174069

Christopher Parry, State Bar No. 209858 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: 650-493-9300 

Fax: 650-565-5100 

Email: cparry@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

NETGEAR, INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SERCONET, LTD., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

NETGEAR, INC. 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. C-06-4646 PJH 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

) 

) 

CASE NO.: C-06-4646 PJH 

Case 4:06-cv-04646-PJH Document 61 Filed 11/13/07 Page 1 of 2
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER -2- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Plaintiff SercoNet, Ltd. and Defendant NETGEAR, Inc., both parties to the above-entitled 

actions, by and through their respective attorneys, do hereby stipulate to dismiss their respective actions 

against each other with prejudice, each side to bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incurred 

in connection with the actions. 

Dated: November 12, 2007 HILL, KERTSCHER & WHARTON 

 

By: /s/Douglas R. Kertscher 

Douglas R. Kertscher 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-defendant 

SERCONET, LTD. 

Dated: November 12, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/Christopher Parry 

Christopher Parry 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

NETGEAR, INC. 

 I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained 

from Douglas R. Kertscher. 

/s/ Christopher Parry 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________, 2007 ____________________________ 

 Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

 United States District Judge 

CASE NO.: C-06-4646 PJH 

November 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-04646-PJH Document 61 Filed 11/13/07 Page 2 of 2