Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01783/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01783-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KOSAL YOUNN, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

LORETTA E. LYNCH, et al, 

Respondents. 

No. 2:15-cv-1783 AC P 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

 A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by the 

postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which 

requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. 

The court also notes that an online search for petitioner’s name in the Sacramento County 

Sheriff’s Department’s inmate locator service returned no search results, indicating that petitioner 

may no longer be in custody even though is current address of record is at Rio Consumnes 

Correctional Center. See http://www.sacsheriff.com/inmate_information/SearchNames.aspx. 1 

This information further suggests that petitioner has failed to update this court with his current 

address as required by Local Rule 183(b). 

 

1

 The court takes judicial notice of the information contained on the Sacramento County Sheriff’s 

Department Inmate Locator Website. See Shaw v. Hahn, 56 F.3d 1128, 1129 n. 1 (9th Cir. 1995) 

(noting that the court may take judicial notice of matters of public record). 

Case 2:15-cv-01783-JAM-AC Document 7 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Petitioner is warned that his failure to prosecute this action or his failure to comply with 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court's orders, or the court's Local Rules will result in a 

recommendation that his entire action be involuntarily dismissed with prejudice. Eastern District 

Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or 

with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions 

authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Petitioner shall show cause, in writing, within 30 days after the filing date of this order, 

why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute; and 

 2. Failure to respond to this court order will result in a recommendation that this case be 

involuntarily dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure. 

DATED: January 4, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-01783-JAM-AC Document 7 Filed 01/04/16 Page 2 of 2