Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-06253/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-06253-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

:JEFFREY-MERRITT : WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

NBS DEFAULT SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-06253-BLF 

ORDER DENYING JUDICIAL 

NOTICES

[Re: ECF 17, 18, 19, 20]

On December 30, 2016, Plaintiff filed the following four documents: (1) Mandatory 

Judicial Notice Entry on the Record of Default of Claim Administrative Remedy, ECF 17; (2) 

Judicial Notice Entry on the Record of Default of Claim Administrative Remedy, ECF 18; (3) 

Judicial Notice “Affidavit of Truth” Re: Habeas Corpus, ECF 19; and (4) Judicial Notice of 

Appointment of Fiduciary, ECF 20. 

Plaintiff previously filed a document similar to (1)–(3), above, see ECF 14, which the 

Court denied because there was no underlying motion and because the document did not appear to 

be of the type subject to judicial notice because the Court was unaware of its origins. See Order 

Denying Mandatory Judicially Noticed Evidence, ECF 15; see also Fed. R. Evid. 201(b) (courts 

may take judicial notice of facts that are “not subject to reasonable dispute”); Lee v. City of Los 

Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 688 (9th Cir. 2001) (taking judicial notice of documents on which 

complaints necessarily rely); Metzler Inv. GMBG v. Corinthian Colls., Inc., 540 F.3d 1049, 1064 

n.7 (9th Cir. 2008) (taking judicial notice of publicly available financial documents such as SEC 

filings). The Court now DENIES (1)–(3), above, for the same reasons. Moreover, as stated in the 

Court’s previous order, these documents have no force or effect.

The Court also DENIES Plaintiff’s Judicial Notice of Appointment of Fiduciary in which 

Case 5:16-cv-06253-BLF Document 22 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

he “nominate[s] and [ ] appoint[s] Beth Labson Freeman / BETH LABSON FREEMAN, a Judge 

or successor Judge as being qualified to fulfill the position of the public ‘Fiduciary/Trustee’ for the 

corporate entity described above in all-capital-letter assemblages = JEFFREY MERRITT 

WILSON, TRUST[.]” See ECF 20. There is no authority for taking this action, and it shall have 

no force or effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2017

 ______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:16-cv-06253-BLF Document 22 Filed 01/03/17 Page 2 of 2