Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_04-cv-02005/USCOURTS-azd-3_04-cv-02005-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Scott Kenton,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Linda Foster,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-04-2005-PCT-PGR 

 

 ORDER

On November 24, 2008, the plaintiff filed a proposed form of judgment that

included the sum of $25,000 as attorney fees (doc. #71), a Notice of Agreement

Regarding Proposed Form of Judgment (doc. #74), wherein he states that the

lodged proposed judgment is a “mutually-agreeable judgment,” and an

Application for Attorneys’ Fees (doc. #72), wherein he seeks attorneys’ fees in

the sum of $25,000. 

Since the defendant has not filed any opposition to the proposed form of

judgment and has not filed an opposition to the Application for Attorneys’ Fees,

the Court construes the proposed form of judgment as being in effect a stipulated

judgment. That being the case, the Court construes the attorneys’ fees

application as being withdrawn as unnecessary. Therefore,

Case 3:04-cv-02005-PGR Document 75 Filed 12/17/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ proposed form of judgment is construed

as a stipulated judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Application for Attorneys’

Fees (doc. #72) is deemed to be withdrawn.

DATED this 17th day of December, 2008.

Case 3:04-cv-02005-PGR Document 75 Filed 12/17/08 Page 2 of 2