Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02254/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02254-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK MOLSKI, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION

SERVICES:HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SYCAMORE CREEK VINEYARDS,

INC., a California corporation, 

Defendant. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-2254 JW (RS)

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”) herein, each party is to bear its

own costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511

U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of

settlement agreements).

///

///

Case 5:04-cv-02254-JW Document 19 Filed 09/27/2005 Page 1 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON -2-

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

DATED: September 27, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Jennifer L. Steneberg 

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI and

DISABILITY RIGHTSENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES:HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

DATED: September 27, 2005 MARSHALL SUZUKI LAW GROUP

By: /s/ Carol J. Marshall 

Carol J. Marshall

Attorneys for Defendant SYCAMORE CREEK

VINEYARDS, INC.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

DATED: _______________, 2005 _____________________________________

Hon. James Ware

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 5:04-cv-02254-JW Document 19 Filed 09/27/2005 Page 2 of 2

September 28 /s/ JAMES WARE