Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00723/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00723-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PERRY C. BUTLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

O. ONYEJIE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00723-AWI-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 21)

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANT T. BYERS, LVN LE MAY,

INSURANCE CARRIER JOHN DOE, and

DOE DEFENDANT LVN

Plaintiff Perry C. Butler (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 24, 2011, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. Doc. 16.The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and

Local Rule 302.

On December 13, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which

was served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and

Recommendations was to be filed within twenty-one days. Doc. 21. Plaintiff did not file an

Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 13, 2011, is adopted in full;

1

Case 1:11-cv-00723-MJS Document 25 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants O.

Onyeje and ENT Jon Doe for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in

violation of the Eighth Amendment;

3. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants T. Byers, LVN Le May, Insurance Carrier John

Doe, and Doe Defendant LVN are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a

claim; and

4. Defendants T. Byers, LVN Le May, Insurance Carrier John Doe, and Doe Defendant

LVN are dismissed from this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 4, 2012 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2

Case 1:11-cv-00723-MJS Document 25 Filed 02/06/12 Page 2 of 2