Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-03660/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-03660-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 7:6(b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

LOUIS LEVINE, Derivatively on Behalf of

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, 

Plaintiff,

v.

MARC L. ANDREESSEN, et al., 

Defendants.

___________________________________

TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL #142

PENSION TRUST,Derivatively on Behalf

of HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, 

v.

MARC L. ANDREESSEN, et al., 

Defendants.

___________________________________

KEY WEST POLICE & FIRE PENSION

FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, 

v.

MARC L. ANDREESSEN, et al., 

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 10-3608 PVT

Case No.: C 10-3659 LHK

Case No.: C 10-3660 PVT

ORDER Finding Cases Related; and 

ORDER that Cases Be Reassigned to a

District Judge

On August 20, 2010, Plaintiffs in Case No. C10-3659 LHK filed a motion to consider

whether the case is related to Case Nos. C10-3608 PVT and C10-3660 PVT. Plaintiffs in Case

Case 5:10-cv-03660-JW Document 1 Filed 08/23/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Case No. C10-3659 was initially assigned to Magistrate Judge Trumbull. After the 1

declination was filed, it was reassigned to District Judge Koh.

ORDER, page 2

No. C10-3659 LHK also filed a Declination to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge.1

Based on the motion and the file herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court finds that Case Nos. C10-3608 PVT, 

C10-3659 LHK, and C10-3660 PVT, are related. They involve substantially the same parties and

events. Each is a derivative case brought on behalf of Hewlett-Packard Company against the same

defendants. They all assert the same or substantially similar claims, and are based on the same or

substantially similar facts. Thus, it is appropriate to relate all three cases and assign all cases to the

judge assigned to the earliest filed case. See CIVIL L.R. 3-12(f)(3). Thus, as of the signing of this

order, all three cases are deemed reassigned to Magistrate Judge Trumbull.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall reassign all three of these

related cases to a District Judge. As noted above, Plaintiffs in Case No. C10-3659 LHK filed a

Declination to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. Thus, the case must be reassigned

to a District Judge 

Dated: 8/23/10

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:10-cv-03660-JW Document 1 Filed 08/23/10 Page 2 of 2