Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-md-02159/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-md-02159-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION AND HEARING DATE ON 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Matthew T. Theriault (SBN 244037)

Matthew.Theriault@capstonelawyers.com

Andrew J. Sokolowski (SBN 226685)

Andrew.Sokolowski@capstonelawyers.com

Capstone Law APC

1840 Century Park East, Suite 450

Los Angeles, California 90067

Telephone: (310) 556-4811

Facsimile: (310) 943-0396

Lead Counsel and Attorneys for 

Plaintiff Jimmy Ellison and the Class

MICHAEL E. BREWER, Bar No. 177912

mbrewer@littler.com

GREGORY G. ISKANDER, Bar No. 200215

giskander@littler.com

JEFFREY J. MANN, Bar No. 253440

jmann@littler.com

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

1255 Treat Boulevard, Suite 600

Walnut Creek, California 94597

Telephone: 925.932.2468

Attorneys for Defendant AUTOZONE, INC.

[Additional counsel listed on following page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA—SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In Re: AUTOZONE, INC., WAGE AND 

HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES 

LITIGATION

Case No.: 3:10-md-02159-CRB

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION AND 

HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO DECERTIFY; ORDER 

Case 3:10-md-02159-CRB Document 278 Filed 05/23/16 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION AND HEARING DATE ON 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ALISON J. CUBRE, Bar No. 257834

acubre@littler.com

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

333 Bush Street, 34th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415.433.1940

Facsimile: 415.399.8490

Attorneys for Defendant

AUTOZONE, INC. (Ellison, Doland, and Escalante Matters)

MICHAEL A. HOFFMAN, Bar No. 162496

mhoffman@arenahoffman.com

ARENA HOFFMAN, LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415.433-1414

Attorney for Defendant

AUTOZONE, INC. (Jimmy Ellison matter only)

Case 3:10-md-02159-CRB Document 278 Filed 05/23/16 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION AND HEARING DATE ON 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

1. Defendant AutoZone, Inc. filed a Motion to Decertify on May 13, 2016 (ECF 

No. 264);

2. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiffs’ Opposition is due on May 27, 2016, 

however, the deposition of Ali Saad, Defendant’s rebuttal witness, is not set until May 27, 

2016, and it is Plaintiffs’ position that the deposition of Dr. Saad is necessary to properly 

oppose Defendant’s Motion to Decertify;

3. Plaintiffs and Defendant have agreed to therefore modify the briefing and 

hearing schedule on Defendant’s Motion to Decertify:

a. Plaintiffs will file and serve their Opposition by June 10, 2016; 

b. Defendant will file and serve its reply brief by June 20, 2016; and

c. The hearing date on Defendant’s Motion, currently on calendar for June 

17, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., be reset to July 8, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD

Dated: May 19, 2016 Capstone Law APC

By: /s/ Andrew J. Sokolowski

Andrew J. Sokolowski

Lead Counsel for the Class

Dated: May 19, 2016 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

By: /s/ Gregory G. Iskander

Michael E. Brewer 

Gregory G. Iskander 

Jeffrey J. Mann

Attorneys for Defendant AUTOZONE, INC.

Attestation Under N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1

I attest, under N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), that I have obtained Gregory G. Iskander’s 

concurrence in the filing of this document.

/s/ Andrew J. Sokolowski

Andrew J. Sokolowski

Case 3:10-md-02159-CRB Document 278 Filed 05/23/16 Page 3 of 4
Page 1

STIPULATION; RE LIMITED EXTENSION OF EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT the 

briefing schedule and hearing date on Defendant’s Motion to Decertify (ECF No. 264) is 

modified as follows: 

a. Plaintiffs shall file and serve their Opposition by June 10, 2016; 

b. Defendant shall file and serve its reply brief by June 20, 2016; and

c. The hearing date on Defendant’s Motion, currently on calendar for June 17, 

2016, at 10:00 a.m., is hereby vacated and reset to July 8, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: May 23, 2016

_________________________

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:10-md-02159-CRB Document 278 Filed 05/23/16 Page 4 of 4