Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05824/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05824-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YUNFEI ZHAI,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JANET NAPOLITANO, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-05824 JSW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CASE SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

On December 11, 2009, a the Court issued a procedural order for immigration

mandamus cases. Defendants were ordered to serve and file an answer within 60 days of

receipt of service of the summons and complaint. However, there is no indication that

Defendants have ever been served with the summons and complaint. 

Therefore, the Court HEREBY ORDERS PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE as to why

his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a

written response by no later than May 6, 2010. Failure to respond to this Order shall result in

dismissal of this matter without prejudice. If Plaintiff has already served the summons and

complaint on Defendant, Plaintiff shall file a proof of service by no later than April 29, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 22, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-05824-JSW Document 3 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 1