Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00026/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00026-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −179)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for

the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 2,275 additional

action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court,

all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to

Judge Chhabria.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the

Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall

be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

John W. Nichols

Clerk of the Panel

Jan 17, 2020

I hereby certify that the annexed 

instrument is a true and correct copy 

of the original on file in my office.

 ATTEST:

 SUSAN Y. SOONG

 Clerk, U.S. District Court

 Northern District of California

by:

 Deputy Clerk

Date: January 17, 2020

Case 2:20-cv-00026-JAM-EFB Document 5 Filed 01/21/20 Page 1 of 3
IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−179 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 2 20−00015 Servadio v. Monsanto Company

CAE 2 20−00016 Applegate v. Monsanto Company

CAE 2 20−00021 Concepcion v. Monsanto Company

CAE 2 20−00023 Dalton v. Monsanto Company

CAE 2 20−00024 Huffman v. Monsanto Company

CAE 2 20−00025 Quigley v. Monsanto Company

CAE 2 20−00026 Smith v. Monsanto Company

CAE 2 20−00028 Wood v. Monsanto Company

DELAWARE

DE 1 19−02372 Helton v. Monsanto Company

DE 1 19−02373 Phillips v. Monsanto Company

FLORIDA MIDDLE

FLM 5 19−00658 Catanzarite v. Monsanto Company

FLM 5 19−00659 Bussmann v. Monsanto Company

LOUISIANA MIDDLE

LAM 3 20−00007 Martin v. Monsanto Company et al

MICHIGAN WESTERN

MIW 1 19−01022 Zuiderveen v. Bayer−Monsanto Company

MINNESOTA

MN 0 20−00036 Frens v. Monsanto Company

MISSOURI EASTERN

MOE 4 19−03108 Keeney v. Monsanto Company et al

Case 2:20-cv-00026-JAM-EFB Document 5 Filed 01/21/20 Page 2 of 3
MOE 4 19−03330 Purner v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19−03333 Osborne v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19−03334 Tucker v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19−03342 Hameister et al v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19−03343 Harrington v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19−03344 Monroe v. Monsanto Company

NEW YORK SOUTHERN

NYS 1 19−11380 Copeland v. Monsanto Company

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN

PAW 2 19−01052 MILLER et al v. MONSANTO COMPANY

TENNESSEE MIDDLE

TNM 3 19−01079 Patton v. Monsanto Company

Case 2:20-cv-00026-JAM-EFB Document 5 Filed 01/21/20 Page 3 of 3