Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-md-01699/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-md-01699-848/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- 

BOST1\491815.2 

13415-401 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING USE OF CEREMONIAL 

COURTROOM AND EQUIPMENT FOR DAUBERT HEARING – M:05-CV-01699-CRB 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE: BEXTRA AND CELEBREX 

MARKETING SALES PRACTICES AND 

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION 

CASE NO. M:05-CV-01699-CRB 

MDL No. 1699 

This Order Relates to: 

 ALL CASES. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING USE OF CEREMONIAL 

COURTROOM AND EQUIPMENT FOR 

DAUBERT HEARING 

Date: October 9-11, 2007 

Time: 9:00 A.M. 

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer, Courtroom 8 

1. The Court has scheduled a joint hearing for these MDL proceedings and 

for the coordinated New York proceedings on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 through Thursday, 

October 11, 2007. 

2. In light of the number of judges and litigants who may be attending the 

hearing, the parties have agreed and the Court has indicated that the hearing will be held in the 

Ceremonial Courtroom. 

3. The parties wish to use certain equipment to display material to the Courts 

and each other, including the following: 

a. Nine monitors for the display of material to the Courts (one for 

each judge, one for the Special Master, one for Judge Breyer’s law clerk, and one for the court 

Case 3:05-md-01699-CRB Document 1892 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- 

BOST1\491815.2 

13415-401 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING USE OF CEREMONIAL 

COURTROOM AND EQUIPMENT FOR DAUBERT HEARING – M:05-CV-01699-CRB 

reporter) and the parties (one for each counsel table, one for counsel at the podium, and one at the 

witness stand); 

b. One large screen to display material to other audience members; 

c. A high-resolution projector for the large screen; 

d. Several wireless microphones for individuals who will be speaking; 

e. A flip chart; 

f. An easel; 

g. A Wolfvision Visualizer (also known as an “elmo”); 

h. Several laser pointers; 

i. Switchers, amplifiers, and speakers; 

j. Two carts with drapes for the projector and the elmo; 

k. A table (approximately 19” x 60”) to hold equipment; and 

l. Cables and extension cords for the equipment listed above. 

4. So that the parties may set up the equipment and test it before the hearing, 

the parties respectfully request permission to bring the equipment listed in paragraph 3 into the 

courthouse on Friday, October 5 at 11:00 a.m., subject to inspection by building security. 

Similarly, the parties request access to the Ceremonial Courtroom on October 5 from 11:00 a.m. 

until 4:00 p.m. 

5. The parties will remove the equipment immediately after the hearing on 

Thursday, October 11. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 2, 2007 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP 

By /s/ 

 ELIZABETH J. CABRASER 

Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel 

Case 3:05-md-01699-CRB Document 1892 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3- 

BOST1\491815.2 

13415-401 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING USE OF CEREMONIAL 

COURTROOM AND EQUIPMENT FOR DAUBERT HEARING – M:05-CV-01699-CRB 

Dated: October 2, 2007 DLA PIPER US LLP 

By /s/ 

 AMY W. SCHULMAN 

 Defendants’ Liaison Counsel 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________, 2007 

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

October 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-md-01699-CRB Document 1892 Filed 10/03/07 Page 3 of 3