Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00271/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00271-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN LISCHEFSKI,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0271 FCD JFM P

vs.

LT. SWEIGERT, et al., ORDER AND

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed March 17, 2005, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff sought reconsideration of that order by

the district court. On June 16, 2005, the order was affirmed and plaintiff was given one

additional thirty day period in which to filed an amended complaint. The thirty day period has

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

court’s order. Accordingly, the court will recommend that the action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

On July 18, 2005 plaintiff filed a letter addressed to the Clerk of the Court,

seeking relief from the payment requirements of this court’s March 17, 2005 order. Plaintiff also

seeks reimbursement for $150.00 worth of property allegedly lost as a result of the partial

payment requirements imposed by that order. The in forma pauperis statute requires the

Case 2:05-cv-00271-FCD-JFM Document 19 Filed 07/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

payments required by the court’s order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Plaintiff’s request will be

denied.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s July 18,

2005 request for relief from the partial payment requirements of this court’s March 17, 2005

order and for other relief is denied; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 27, 2005. 

12

lisc0271.fta

Case 2:05-cv-00271-FCD-JFM Document 19 Filed 07/28/05 Page 2 of 2