Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05448/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05448-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTONIO CORTEZ BUCKLEY,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 14-cv-05448-YGR 

ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF COUNTY AND 

SHERIFF DEFENDANTS 

Re: Dkt. No. 52 

On October 2, 2015 this Court entered an Order granting in part Defendants’ motion to 

dismiss. (Dkt. No. 52.) Specifically, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims against the County of 

San Mateo and Sheriff Munks and granted Plaintiff leave to amend with respect thereto. Plaintiff 

was thereafter in custody at the Maguire Correctional Facility and was unable to amend his 

complaint within the timeframe set by the Court. (See Dkt. No. 58.) 

At the Initial Case Management Conference held before this Court on March 28, 2016, 

Plaintiff indicated he did not intend to amend his complaint as to the County or Sheriff. Plaintiff 

instead requested the Court dismiss the County and Sheriff as defendants in this action. 

Defendants County of San Mateo and Sheriff Munks accordingly are DISMISSED WITHOUT 

LEAVE TO AMEND. 

The remaining Defendants in this action1 shall file their answer to the First Amended 

Complaint (Dkt. No. 29) within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 8, 2016 

_______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

 1

 The remaining Defendants are Deputy Sheriffs: Justice, Michael, Echano, Tapia, Moody, 

Alonso, Copeland, and Criado. 

Case 4:14-cv-05448-YGR Document 73 Filed 04/08/16 Page 1 of 1