Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-05-02194/USCOURTS-ca8-05-02194-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

1

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District Court of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2194

___________

Sharnell M. Horne, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Denny’s Restaurant, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: February 20, 2006

Filed: February 24, 2006 

___________

Before MURPHY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sharnell M. Horne appeals the district court’s1

 denial of the post-judgment

motions she filed more than ten days after the dismissal of her civil action against

Denny’s Restaurants (Denny’s). Liberally construing these as Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 60(b) motions, see Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 164-65, 169

(8th Cir. 1988) (construing reconsideration motion filed more than 10 days after entry

of judgment under Rule 60(b)), we conclude the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying them, see Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir.)

Appellate Case: 05-2194 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2006 Entry ID: 2013293
-2-

(standard of review; no abuse of discretion where appellant’s “Rule 60(b) motion

largely reasserted contentions made in earlier motions” and “failed to demonstrate

exceptional circumstances warranting post-judgment relief”), cert. denied, 534 U.S.

975 (2001). 

Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny as moot Denny’s motions to strike

Horne’s post-appeal submissions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

Appellate Case: 05-2194 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2006 Entry ID: 2013293