Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05524/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05524-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTINA WONG,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ELLEN ANDERSON, ET AL., 

Defendants. /

No. 3:14-cv-05524-CRB

SCHEDULING ORDER RE MOTIONS

TO DISMISS

The Court is in receipt of pro se Plaintiff Christina Wong’s motion (dkt. 26) for an

extension of time to respond to the motions to dismiss filed by defendants San Francisco

Housing Development Corporation (“SFHDC”) (dkt. 11) and Borrower’s Best (dkt. 14). 

The deadline to respond to SFHDC’s and Borrower’s Best’s motions passed on February 4

and February 6, respectively, without any filing from Wong. Also pending is a joint motion

to dismiss by defendants Ellen Anderson and Linda Harrison (dkt. 7), to which Wong did not

respond, and a motion to dismiss by defendant City and County of San Francisco (dkt. 16), to

which a response is due February 13. 

The Court hereby vacates the February 27, 2015 hearing on the motions to dismiss

filed by SFHDC, Borrower’s Best, Anderson, and Harrison. Those hearings are rescheduled

and consolidated with the March 6, 2015, 10:00 a.m., hearing on the motion to dismiss filed

by the City and County of San Francisco. Wong may file any written oppositions to all

Case 3:14-cv-05524-CRB Document 35 Filed 02/10/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

pending motions by February 20, 2015. Defendants should file any replies by February 27, 

2015. The Court puts all parties on notice that it might take the matter under submission

without a hearing pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-1(b), so written

filings should contain all arguments the parties wish to make in defense or opposition to the

motions to dismiss. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2015 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-05524-CRB Document 35 Filed 02/10/15 Page 2 of 2