Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00543/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00543-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 42:1396 - Tort Negligence

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD M. GRASSI, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-09-0543 JAM DAD PS

v.

MOODY’S INVESTOR’S SERVICES, ORDER

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. With the

filing of defendants’ joint reply to plaintiffs’ opposition, the motion is now fully briefed. 

Plaintiffs seek leave to file a reply to defendants’ reply. The court finds the proposed additional

briefing to be unnecessary. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs’ June 7, 2010 request (Doc. No. 96)

for leave to file a reply to defendants’ reply is denied.

DATED: June 8, 2010.

DAD:kw

dad1/orders.pro se/grassi0543.ord.req3

Case 2:09-cv-00543-JAM -DAD Document 97 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 1