Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05138/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05138-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT

OF MOTION TO DISMISS, C-03-5138 VRW

N:\03-5138page limit.DOC

BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838

PERI NIELSEN, State Bar No. 196781

KRISANA M. HODGES, State Bar No. 234629

RANDOLPH GAW, State Bar No. 223718

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

650 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050

Telephone: (650) 493-9300

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100

boris.feldman@wsgr.com; nlocker@wsgr.com;

pnielsen@wsgr.com; khodges@wsgr.com; 

rgaw@wsgr.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

Portal Software, Inc., John E. Little, 

Howard A. Bain, III, and Arthur C. Patterson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re PORTAL SOFTWARE, INC. SECURITIES

LITIGATION

_______________________________________

This Document Relates To:

ALL ACTIONS.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C-03-5138 VRW

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXPANDING PAGE

LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THE

MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD

AMENDED CONSOLIDATED

COMPLAINT

Case 3:03-cv-05138-VRW Document 125 Filed 06/22/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT

OF MOTION TO DISMISS, C-03-5138 VRW

-1-

WHEREAS, on May 25, 2005, the parties stipulated and the Court so ordered that

Defendants may file a thirty-five (35) page motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint

pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that Plaintiffs

may file a thirty-five (35) page opposition to that motion; 

WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 7-3(c) provides for a fifteen (15) page limit on the reply in

support of the motion by Defendants Portal Software, Inc., John E. Little, and Howard A. Bain,

III, and Arthur C. Patterson (collectively, “Defendants”) to dismiss the Third Consolidated

Amended Complaint, scheduled to be filed on June 23, 2005; 

WHEREAS, in the interests of efficiency and economy, Defendants wish to address the

new claims and allegations raised in the Third Consolidated Amended Complaint by filing a reply

memorandum in further support of their motion to dismiss that exceeds the fifteen (15) page limit

by no more than five (5) pages; 

WHEREAS, plaintiffs do not object to Defendants being granted permission to file a reply

in excess of the page limitations set forth in Rule 7-3(c) of the Rules of Practice of the United

States District Court for the Northern District of California;

THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE as follows:

1. Defendants may file a reply in further support of their motion to dismiss the Third

Consolidated Amended Complaint that exceeds the fifteen (15) page limit by no more than five

(5) pages, exclusive of attachments.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 21, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Krisana M. Hodges

 Krisana M. Hodges

Attorneys for Defendants PORTAL SOFTWARE,

INC., JOHN E. LITTLE, HOWARD A. BAIN, III,

and ARTHUR C. PATTERSON 

Case 3:03-cv-05138-VRW Document 125 Filed 06/22/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT

OF MOTION TO DISMISS, C-03-5138 VRW

-2-

Dated: June 21, 2005 LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER

RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP

By: _/s/ Robert M. Rothman

 Robert M. Rothman

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________ _________________________________

The Honorable Vaughn R. Walker

United States District Court Judge

Case 3:03-cv-05138-VRW Document 125 Filed 06/22/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT

OF MOTION TO DISMISS, C-03-5138 VRW

-3-

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

I, Krisana M. Hodges, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of

the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 21st day of

June, 2005 at Palo Alto, California.

By: /s/ Krisana M. Hodges

 Krisana M. Hodges

Case 3:03-cv-05138-VRW Document 125 Filed 06/22/05 Page 4 of 4