Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-02549/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-02549-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NIKKO MATERIALS USA, INC. d/b/a

GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC., an

Arizona Corporation,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

R.E. SERVICE CO., INC., a California

corporation,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 03-2549 SBA

ORDER

[Docket No. 504]

On May 27, 2005, Defendant R.E. Service Co., Inc. filed a Motion forJudgment as a Matter ofLaw,

or alternatively, for New Trial ("Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law") [Docket No. 504].

Defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is set for a July 12, 2005 hearing. 

However, also currently pending before the Court are: Plaintiff's Motion for Award of Damages

[Docket No. 435], Plaintiff's Motion for a Permanent Injunction [Docket No. 440], Defendant's Motion for

Application of Laches [Docket No. 446], Plaintiff's Motion for an Exceptional Case and Attorney's Fees

[Docket No. 457], and Plaintiff's Motion for Enhanced Damages [Docket No. 458] (collectively, the "PostTrial Motions"). 

Since the Post-TrialMotions are currently under submissionwith the Court, the Court finds that, in the

interest of judicial economy, Defendant's Motion forJudgment as a Matter ofLaw should also be taken under

submission. 

Accordingly, 

Case 4:03-cv-02549-SBA Document 518 Filed 07/01/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the July 12, 2005 hearing on Defendant's Motion for Judgment

as a Matter of Law, or alternatively, for New Trial [Docket No. 504] is VACATED. Should the Court find

a hearing on the motion necessary, it will notify the parties accordingly. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

Dated: July 1, 2005 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cv-02549-SBA Document 518 Filed 07/01/05 Page 2 of 2