Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00167/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00167-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

SV1:\255572\01\5h7801!.DOC\59204.0007 

[APPEARANCES LISTED ON SIGNATURE 

PAGES]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LEXAR MEDIA, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE 

SCHEDULE; SUPPORTING 

DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 140 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 1 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

SV1:\255572\01\5h7801!.DOC\59204.0007

The parties have met and conferred and agree that a short extension of time will be 

needed to complete expert discovery and dispositive motion briefing. Accordingly, the parties 

hereby stipulate that, with the Court’s permission, the current schedule set forth in the July 28, 

2006 Scheduling Order and the August 30, 2006 Scheduling Order be modified as follows. 

Event July 28 

Scheduling Order 

Proposed Date 

Rebuttal expert reports September 13, 2006 September 22, 2006 

Event August 30 

Scheduling Order 

Proposed Date 

Opposition briefs due September 8, 2006 September 22, 2006 

Reply briefs due September 22, 2006 October 6, 2006 

The remaining dates in the May 24, 2006 Scheduling Order shall remain in effect. 

By his signature below, counsel for Lexar attests under penalty of perjury that 

counsel for Toshiba concurs in the filing of this Stipulation. 

 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 140 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 2 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

SV1:\255572\01\5h7801!.DOC\59204.0007

Dated: September 8, 2006 /s/ Steven Cherensky 

Matthew D. Powers (Bar No. 104795) 

matthew.powers@weil.com 

Steven Cherensky (Bar No. 168275) 

steven.cherensky@weil.com 

Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650) 

chris.cox@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Silicon Valley Office 

201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Telephone: (650) 802-3000 

Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 

Anita E. Kadala 

anita.kadala@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Houston Office 

700 Louisiana, Suite 1600 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 546-5000 

Facsimile: (713) 224-9511 

Attorneys for LEXAR MEDIA, INC. 

Dated: September 8, 2006 /s/ Carl Schlier 

Robert F. McCauley (Bar No. 162056) 

robert.mccauley@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

Stanford Research Park 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Arthur I. Neustadt 

aneustadt@oblon.com 

Richard D. Kelly 

rkelly@oblon.com 

Carl E. Schlier 

cschlier@oblon.com 

OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & 

NEUSTADT, P.C. 

1940 Duke Street 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

Telephone: (703) 413-3000 

Facsimile: (703) 413-2220 

Attorneys for TOSHIBA CORPORATION 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 140 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 3 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

SV1:\255572\01\5h7801!.DOC\59204.0007

SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF STEVEN CHERENSKY 

 I, Steven Cherensky, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in the State of California and the United 

States District Court for the Northern District of California, and am a member of the firm Weil, 

Gotshal & Manges L.L.P., attorneys of record for Lexar Media, Inc. The matters referred to in 

this declaration are based on my personal knowledge and if called as a witness I could, and 

would, testify competently to those matters. 

2. The factual representations made in the above Stipulation are true. The parties 

have been actively engaged in completing fact and expert discovery, including preparing for and 

taking depositions in the United States for the past several months, and preparing expert reports. 

In recent weeks, the parties have met and conferred and agreed that the schedule in this case 

should be extended, as requested above, to permit the orderly completion of expert reports and 

discovery and of dispositive motion briefing. 

3. There have not been any prior modifications to the Court’s July 28, 2006 and 

August 30, 2006 Scheduling Orders. The August 30, 2006 Scheduling Order modified the May 

24, 2006 Scheduling Order. The July 28, 2006 Scheduling Order modified the July 14, 2006 

Proposed Order, which was not entered by the Court. The July 14, 2006 Proposed Order 

modified the June 23, 2006 Scheduling Order. The June 23, 2006 Scheduling Order modified the 

schedule set forth in the May 24, 2006 Scheduling Order. The May 24, 2006 Scheduling Order 

modified the schedule set forth in the February 10, 2006 Scheduling Order. The May 24, 2006 

Scheduling Order also modified the proposed scheduling order submitted by the parties on April 

14, 2006, which was not entered by the Court. The February 10, 2006 Scheduling Order 

modified the schedule set forth in the June 8, 2005 Scheduling Order. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on September 8, 2006 at 

Redwood Shores, California. 

 /s/ Steven Cherensky 

 Steven Cherensky 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 140 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 4 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

SV1:\255572\01\5h7801!.DOC\59204.0007

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________ __________________________________________ 

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 140 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 5 of 5

9/14/2006

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 5 of 5