Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05390/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05390-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE TAC

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HOFFMAN EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS

Michael Hoffman (SBN 154481)

mhoffman@employment-lawyers.com

Leonard Emma (SBN 224483)

lemma@employment-lawyers.com

Stephen Noel Ilg (SBN 275599)

silg@employment-lawyers.com

580 California Street, Suite 1600

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel (415) 362-1111

Fax (415) 362-1112

Attorneys for Plaintiff HAROLD VILLANUEVA

MELINDA S. RIECHERT, State Bar No. 65504

MICHAEL D. SCHLEMMER, State Bar No. 250000

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

2 Palo Alto Square

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700

Palo Alto, CA 94306

Tel: 650.843.4000

Fax: 650.843.4001

E-Mail: mriechert@morganlewis.com

E-Mail: mschlemmer@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant MORPHO DETECTION, LLC,

incorrectly named as MORPHO DETECTION, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAROLD VILLANUEVA, individually and 

on behalf of all others similarly situated, and 

the general public,

Plaintiff,

v.

MORPHO DETECTION, INC., and DOES 1 

to 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO: 13-cv-05390-HSG

CLASS ACTION

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Case 4:13-cv-05390-HSG Document 54 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 4
-2-

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE TAC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-12 and 10-1 of the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California, the Parties to the above entitled action, HAROLD 

VILLANUEVA (“Plaintiff”) and MORPHO DETECTION, LLC (“Defendant”) (collectively 

referred to as the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, enter into the following 

Stipulation:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff seeks to file a Third Amended Complaint (a copy of which is 

attached as Exhibit A), with the Court; 

WHEREAS, the Third Amended Complaint differs from the Second Amended Complaint 

in the following respects:

a) Plaintiff adds additional causes of action under California Labor Code §§ 201 et seq., 

and the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

b) Plaintiff clarifies the class definition.

c) Minor spelling and grammatical errors are corrected.

WHEREAS, Defendant does not oppose the filing of this proposed Third Amended 

Complaint. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff may have leave to file a Third Amended Complaint a copy of which is 

attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” 

2. The Third Amended Complaint attached hereto shall be and hereby is deemed 

filed and served on all Parties as of the date of the Court's Order on this Stipulation. 

3. Defendant does not need to file a response to Plaintiff s Third Amended 

Complaint, and Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint shall be deemed 

to be the response to the Third Amended Complaint.

4. The fact that Defendant has stipulated to the foregoing is not intended to be, and 

should not be construed as, an admission by Defendant that it accepts, concedes, or admits the 

allegations asserted in the Third Amended Complaint. Despite this Stipulation, Defendant 

retains all rights and defenses available to it in response to the allegations, claims and matters 

asserted in the Third Amended Complaint.

Case 4:13-cv-05390-HSG Document 54 Filed 04/16/15 Page 2 of 4
-3-

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE TAC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: April 13, 2015 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLC

 /s/ Michael Schlemmer

By

Melinda Riechert

Michael Schlemmer

Attorneys for Defendant

MORPHO DETECTION, LLC

DATED: April 14, 2015

HOFFMAN EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS

 /s/ Leonard Emma

BY

Michael Hoffman

Leonard Emma

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

HAROLD VILLANUEVA et al.

Attestation

Pursuant to Northern District L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Leonard Emma, attest 

that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 

signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 

that the foregoing is true and correct.

Case 4:13-cv-05390-HSG Document 54 Filed 04/16/15 Page 3 of 4
-4-

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE TAC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: April 14, 2015

HOFFMAN EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS

 /s/ Leonard Emma

BY

Michael Hoffman

Leonard Emma

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

HAROLD VILLANUEVA et al.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Third Amended Complaint. The Third Amended 

Complaint attached to the Parties’ Stipulation for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint 

shall be and hereby is deemed filed and served on all Parties as of the date the Court enters the 

Order granting the JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT. Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended 

Complaint shall be deemed to be the response to the Third Amended Complaint.

Dated: _________________ ____________________________________

United States District Judge

4/16/2015

Case 4:13-cv-05390-HSG Document 54 Filed 04/16/15 Page 4 of 4