Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01244/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01244-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

a

J

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

t2

13

I4

15

t6

t7

18

T9

20

2T

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MAYER BROWN LLP

STEVEN E. RICH (sBN t984t2)

,s wn.com

ANDERSON, OGILVIE

MARK F. ANDERSON

com

& BREWER LLP

(sBN 44787)

treet, Suite 914

94104

350 Grand 25th Floor 235

503 San

Attorneys for Defendant

CITIMORTGAGE, INC

Attornevs for Plaintiffs

PAUL R. CHEBOT ANd BRENDA L.

CHABOT

651-t951

500-8300

Case No. 4: I5-cv-01244-DMR

229-9s00

625-0248

Teleohone ¡ .-

Facsrmrle: )

)

)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

PAUL R. CHABOT and BRENDA L.

CHABOT,

Plaintiffs,

JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST

AND PROPOSED ORDER

EXTENDII\G TIME TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT V

E, INC., a New York

ERIAN

SOLU:

an Ohio comorati

INFORMATION

Georsia limited I

TRAÑS TINION

limited liability company,

Defendants.

Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc. ("CitiMortgage") and Plaintiffs Paul R.

Chabot and Brenda L. Chabot ("Plaintifß") (together with CitiMortgage, the

"Parties") respectfully submit the following Joint Stipulated Request and Proposed

Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2

and 7 -I2.

JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT

Case No. 4:15-cv-07244-DMR

Case 3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document 17 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 6 Case3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document11 Filed03/31/15 Page1 of 4
I

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

T2

13

T4

15

l6

17

18

t9

20

2T

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED REOUEST

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on March 77 ,2015;

WHEREAS, CitiMortgage's registered agent was served with the Complaint

and Summons on March 19,2015;'

WHEREAS, the Parties have not filed any prior request for modification of

any dates in this case; and,

WHEREAS, in the interests ofjudicial economy, the Parties have engaged in

cooperative discussions related to scheduling and streamlining of the case, and

believe as a result, and so that CitiMortgage may fully investigate the factual

allegations made by Plaintiffs, that good cause exists here to coordinate and extend

CitiMortgage's response date from April 9,2015 to May 26,2015.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND

RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED AS FOLLOWS :

CitiMortgage shall respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint on, or before, l|l4ay 26,

2015. The Parties agree that by entering into this Stipulation, no Party waives any

right or remedy.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: March 3I, 2015

Re sp ectfully submitted,

MAYER BROWN LLP

/s/ Steven E. Rich

Steven E. Rich

Attorneys for Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc

2

JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT

Case No. 4:75-cv-01244-DMR

Case 3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document 17 Filed 04/03/15 Page 2 of 6 Case3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document11 Filed03/31/15 Page2 of 4
1

2

a

J

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

I2

13

t4

15

16

t7

18

l9

20

2T

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: March 31,2015 ANDERSON, OGILVIE & BREWER LLP

/s/ Mark F. Anderson

Mark F. Anderson

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Paul R. Chabot and

Brenda L. Chabot

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated 20rs

Hon.

United States District Judge

-3-

JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT

Case No. 4:15 -cv -01244-DMR

Case3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document11 Filed03/31/15 Page3 of 4

4/3 Edward M. Chen

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document 17 Filed 04/03/15 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

t2

13

t4

15

T6

T7

18

t9

20

2l

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FILER ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(Ð(3), I, Steven E. Rich, attest under penalty

of perjury that concurence in the filing of this document has been obtained from

all of the signatories.

DATED: March 31,2015

/s/ Steven E. Rich

Steven E. Rich

4

JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT

Case No. 4:15-cv-01244-DMR

Case 3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document 17 Filed 04/03/15 Page 4 of 6 Case3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document11 Filed03/31/15 Page4 of 4
1

2

a

J

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

T2

13

T4

15

I6

17

18

t9

20

2T

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MAYER BROWN LLP

STEVEN E. RICH (sBN r984r2)

,s com

3s0 Grand Avenue 25th Floor

9007t-i 503

229-9s00

62s-0248

Attorneys for Defendant

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAI{D DIVISION

PAUL R. CHABOT and BRENDA L

CHABOT,

Case No. 4: 1 5-cv-O1244-DMR

Plaintiffs,

DECLARATION OF' STEVEN E.

RICH IN SUPPORT OF'JOINT

STIPULATED REQUEST AND

PROPOSED ORDER

EXTENDING TIME TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CITIMORTGAG INC. a New York

orati

Defendants

I, Steven E. Rich, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Californta and

am counsel at Mayer Brown LLP, counsel of record for Defendant CitiMortgage,

Inc. ("CitiMortgage"). I submit this Declaration in support of the Parties' Joint

Stipulated Request and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint,

pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 andT-I2. I have personal knowledge of the facts

DECLARATION OF STEVEN E. RICH IN SUPPORT OF JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 4:15-cv-01244-DMR

V

Case 3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document 17 Filed 04/03/15 Page 5 of 6 Case3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document11-1 Filed03/31/15 Page1 of 2
1

2

J

4

5

6

7

8

9

l0

11

t2

13

t4

15

T6

T7

18

t9

20

2t

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

stated within this Declaration and could testify competently to them if required.

2. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on March 17 ,2015. Following service

of the Complaint on CitiMortgage's registered agent on March 79,2015, counsel

for CitiMortgage contacted counsel for Plaintiffs and discussed an appropriate

response date.

3. The Parties have not flrled any prior request for modification of any

dates in this case.

4. CitiMortgage and Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, have

engaged in a cooperative discussion related to scheduling and streamlining of the

case, and believe as a result, and so that CitiMortgage may fully investigate the

factual allegations made by Plaintifß, that good cause exists to coordinate and

extend CitiMortgage's response date from April 9,2015 to May 26,2015.

5. The requested modification of time described above will only impact

the response date and is not intended to change any other date set by the Court.

The Parties have further agreed that by entering into this Stipulation, no Party

waives any right or remedy.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that

the foregoing facts are true and correct, and that this Declaration was executed on

March 3I,2075, in Los Angeles, CA.

Steven E. Rich

2

DECLARATION OF STEVEN E. RICH IN SUPPORT OF JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 4:15-cv-01244-DMR

Case 3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document 17 Filed 04/03/15 Page 6 of 6 Case3:15-cv-01244-EMC Document11-1 Filed03/31/15 Page2 of 2