Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01071/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01071-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07cv1071 WQH (WMc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVE KASSAB,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, a

municipal corporation, et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 07cv1071 WQH (WMc)

ORDER FOLLOWING TELEPHONIC

DISCOVERY CONFERENCE 

On October 20, 2008, the Court held a telephonic discovery conference. After hearing

from Plaintiff and defense counsel, the Court issues the following orders:

1. Should Plaintiff seek discovery concerning the additional defendants named in his

First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff cannot rely on discovery served before the filing of the First

Amended Complaint, but must serve a new Request;

2. Defendants shall respond to new discovery requests, if any, propounded by Plaintiff

no later than 15 days after service;

3. Defendants’ oral motion to stay discovery is DENIED without prejudice; and

4. Defendants shall provide audio for the video tapes previously produced to Plaintiff no

later than November 3, 2008. If no audio is available, Defendants shall so indicate in a letter to

Plaintiff with a copy to be provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 20, 2008

Hon. William McCurine, Jr.

U.S. Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court

Case 3:07-cv-01071-BAS-JLB Document 82 Filed 10/20/08 Page 1 of 1