Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02928/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02928-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -1- Printed on Recycled Paper 

MARKMAN BRIEF DATES AND PAGE LIMITATIONS 

Case No.: C 04-2928 JW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL J. BETTINGER (State Bar No. 122196) ROBERT F. MCCAULEY (State Bar No. 162056)

PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW 

55 Second Street, Suite 1700 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

San Francisco, CA 94105 Stanford Research Park 

Phone: (415) 882-8200 700 Hansen Way 

Fax: (415) 882-8220 Palo Alto, CA 94304 

 Phone: (650) 849-6600 

Attorneys for Defendant Fax: (650) 849-6666 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ERIC R. LAMISON (State Bar No. 178262) TELESHUTTLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP TELESHUTTLE CORPORATION, and BTG 

555 California Street INTERNATIONAL INC. 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1501 

Phone: (415) 439-1400 

Fax: (415) 439-1500 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE COMPUTER, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION

TELESHUTTLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

TELESHUTTLE CORPORATION, and BTG 

INTERNATIONAL INC., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION and APPLE 

COMPUTER, INC. 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: C04-2928 JW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING DUE DATE FOR 

MARKMAN REPLY BRIEF AND PAGE 

LIMITATIONS 

This Court, pursuant to an Order Continuing Claims Construction Proceedings dated 

September 22, 2005, continued the claims construction proceedings to January 13, 20 and 27, 2006.

In the interest of efficient case management, the parties stipulate as follows: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:04-cv-02928-JW Document 130 Filed 10/05/05 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -2- Printed on Recycled Paper 

MARKMAN BRIEF DATES AND PAGE LIMITATIONS 

Case No.: C 04-2928 JW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs’ Reply Markman Brief, which was previously ordered due on October 4, 2005, 

shall now be due on October 11, 2005. 

By stipulated Order dated September 2, 2005, plaintiffs are entitled to a 25-page Reply 

Markman Brief. In the interest of efficiency, the parties stipulate that plaintiffs may file a Reply 

Markman Brief of up to 30 pages to respond to defendants’ joint Responsive Markman Brief. 

By his signature below, counsel for plaintiffs attests under penalty of perjury that counsel for 

defendants concurred in the filing of this document. 

DATED: September 28, 2005 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP

 By /s/ 

 MICHAEL J. BETTINGER 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 

DATED: September 28, 2005 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

 By: /s/ 

 ERIC R. LAMISON 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 APPLE COMPUTER, INC. 

DATED: September 28, 2005 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &

 DUNNER, LLP 

 By: _____/s/_____________________________

 ROBERT F. MCCAULEY 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 TELESHUTTLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 

 TELESHUTTLE CORPORATION, and BTG 

 INTERNATIONAL INC. 

Case 5:04-cv-02928-JW Document 130 Filed 10/05/05 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -3- Printed on Recycled Paper 

MARKMAN BRIEF DATES AND PAGE LIMITATIONS 

Case No.: C 04-2928 JW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: ______

 United States District Judge 

`0/5/05 /s/ James Ware

Case 5:04-cv-02928-JW Document 130 Filed 10/05/05 Page 3 of 3