Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01061/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01061-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS DAVID HAGBERG, )

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

)

No. CV-F-05-1061 REC/LJO HC

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241

On August 19, 2005, petitioner Thomas David Hagberg filed a

pleading entitled “§ 2241 Further Revised and Updated Petition to

Get Credit for Time Served.” Petitioner contends that he is

entitled to credit against his federal sentence for the time

served while in state custody pursuant to a federal no-bail

detainer. Petitioner further contends that he was denied his

right to a speedy trial in United States v. Hagberg, No. CR-F-00-

5371 REC.

To the extent that petitioner contends that he is entitled

to credit for time served, petitioner is challenging the

Case 1:05-cv-01061-REC-LJO Document 3 Filed 08/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

execution of his sentence. See United States v. Giddings, 740

F.2d 770 (9 Cir. 1984). Such a challenge must be addressed to th

the district court which has jurisdiction over petitioner or his

custodian. Because petitioner is incarcerated at the federal

prison in Springfield, Missouri, he must file his Section 2241

petition challenging his entitlement to credit for time served in

the appropriate United States District Court in Missouri.

To the extent petitioner claims that his right to a speedy

trial was violated in No. CR-F-00-5371 REC, petitioner cannot

make such a claim in this petition. Petitioner filed a motion to

vacate, set aside or correct sentence in this court on March 29,

2004, No. CV-F-04-5502 REC, in which he claimed that his right to

a speedy trial was violated. By Order filed on May 13, 2004, the

court denied petitioner’s Section 2255 motion. Therefore,

petitioner’s claim has been resolved and cannot be revisited in a

Section 2241 motion.

ACCORDINGLY:

1. Petitioner Thomas David Hagberg’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 29, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01061-REC-LJO Document 3 Filed 08/29/05 Page 2 of 2