Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00673/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00673-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODNEY DURRELL KIRK,

Petitioner,

v.

JOHN MARSHALL,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 06-0673 OWW SMS HC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

FOR RESPONDENT’S FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER

[Doc. 6]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Petitioner filed the petition for writ of habeas corpus on June 1, 2006. By order of July

18, 2006, the court directed Respondent to file a response within ninety days from the date of

service of that order. (Court Doc. 6.) The order was electronically served on Respondent on the

same day. (Id.) Over ninety days have passed and Respondent has failed to file a response. 

Local Rule 11-110 provides that “a failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these

Local Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any

and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.@ 

///

///

///

///

Case 1:06-cv-00673-OWW -SMS Document 7 Filed 11/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED within twenty (20) days of service of this order,

to SHOW CAUSE why appropriate sanctions should not be imposed for failing to obey a court

order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 6, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00673-OWW -SMS Document 7 Filed 11/06/06 Page 2 of 2