Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02871/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02871-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURENCE FAULKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-02871-MEJ 

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY MEET AND 

CONFER PROCEDURE

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's request, filed September 18, 2015, regarding the inperson meet and confer requirement for discovery disputes. Dkt. No. 80. Good cause appearing, 

the Court hereby GRANTS the request to meet and confer, on the condition that the parties meet 

and confer by video conference when such technology is available. To ensure compliance with 

the spirit of the meet and confer requirement, if video conference is unavailable and the parties

need to meet and confer by telephone, they shall make a contemporaneous record of their meetings 

using a court reporter or electronic recording device. Any joint letter filed with the Court must 

include as part of the cover page a statement as to how the parties met and conferred in 

compliance with this Order and the Discovery Standing Order.

The parties should be mindful that the Court shall reinstate the in-person meeting 

requirement if it determines that these meetings are not fruitful.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 21, 2015

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-02871-MEJ Document 84 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 1