Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04343/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04343-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

MORTGAGE ACADEMY LLC,

Defendant. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 06-4343 PVT

ORDER RE: DECLARATION IN

SUPPORT OF ORDER ENTERING

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO

STIPULATION

On June 8, 2007, Plaintiff First Franklin Financial Corporation (“Plaintiff”) filed a

Declaration of Brian H. Gunn in Support of [Proposed] Order Entering Judgment Pursuant to

Stipulation for Entry of Judgment filed by First Franklin Financial Corporation (“Gunn

Declaration”). Plaintiff attached a Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement and a Stipulation

for Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation”) as Exhibits A and B to the Gunn Declaration. Plaintiff

also attached a “[Proposed] Order RE Notice of Entry of Judgment in the Amount of

$152,928.84 Per Stipulated Judgment. The Stipulation for Entry of Judgment states: 

This Stipulation is lodged in conjunction with the Release and Settlement

Agreement entered into by First Franklin and Mortgage Academy and can only be

enforced upon presentation of a copy of the Release and Settlement Agreement to

the Court by way of noticed motion with not less than the minimum amount of

notice for motion. No judgment shall be entered prior to the hearing on the

noticed motion.

Case 5:06-cv-04343-PVT Document 40 Filed 06/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

 (Stipulation, Gunn Decl. Exh. B. at ¶ 1.) Plaintiff has not filed any Noticed Motion for Entry of

Judgment. 

In light of the foregoing, It Is Hereby Ordered that the Court will take no action on the

Gunn Declaration in the absence of a duly noticed motion as required by the Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 13, 2007

____________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:06-cv-04343-PVT Document 40 Filed 06/13/07 Page 2 of 2