Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00339/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00339-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 08-CV-0339-CRB 

Rowan D. Wilson (SBN 118488) 

Cravath, Swaine & Moore, LLP 

825 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10019 

Tel: (212) 474-1000 

Fax: (212) 474-3800 

Email: rwilson@cravath.com 

 

Attorneys for Defendant Thai Airways International 

Public Company, Ltd. 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

MICAH ABRAMS, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AIR NEW ZEALAND LTD., ALL NIPPON 

AIRWAYS CO. LTD., CHINA AIRLINES 

LTD., EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION, 

JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL 

CO. LTD., MALAYSIA AIRLINE 

SYSTEM BERHAD, NORTHWEST 

AIRLINES, INC., QANTAS AIRWAYS, 

LTD., SINGAPORE AIRLINES, LTD., 

AND THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL 

PUBLIC COMPANY, LTD., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 08-CV-0339-CRB 

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

Case 3:08-cv-00339-CRB Document 32 Filed 03/28/08 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 08-CV-0339-CRB 

2

 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, and in light of the February 19, 2008 Judicial Panel on 

Multidistrict Litigation Transfer Order consolidating this case and the other Transpacific 

Passenger Air cases and the Court’s Reassignment Order of January 24, 2008, Plaintiff Micah 

Abrams (“Plaintiff”), and defendant Thai Airways International Public Company, Ltd. 

(“Defendant”), through counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant’s time to answer, move or 

otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint shall be extended until forty-five days after the filing 

of a Consolidated Amended Complaint in the Transpacific Air Passenger cases, or such other 

times as the parties may jointly agree to in writing. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that defense counsel shall accept service 

on behalf of Defendant of the summons and complaints in the above-captioned matter, including 

any amended or consolidated complaints, and further, that Defendant shall not contest sufficiency 

of process or service of process. This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver of any other 

defense including, but not limited to, the defenses of lack of personal or subject matter 

jurisdiction or improper venue. Nothing in this paragraph shall obligate Defendant to answer, 

move, or otherwise respond to any complaint until the time provided in the preceding paragraph. 

 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Dated: March 25, 2008 By: /s/ Rowan D. Wilson

Rowan D. Wilson 

CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 

825 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10019 

Telephone: (212) 474-1000 

Fax: (212) 474-3700 

Attorney for Defendant Thai Airways 

International Company Limited 

Case 3:08-cv-00339-CRB Document 32 Filed 03/28/08 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 08-CV-0339-CRB 

3

 

Dated: March 25, 2008 By: /s/ Athena Hou (by authorization)

 

 Craig C. Corbitt (No. 83251) 

 Matthew R. Schultz (No. 220641) 

 Jiangxiao Athena Hou (No. 215256) 

 Patrick B. Clayton (No. 240191) 

 ZELLE, HOFMANN, VOELBEL, MASON 

 & GETTE LLP

 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400 

 San Francisco, CA 94104 

 Telephone: (415) 693-0700 

 Facsimile: (415) 693-0770 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Dated: March 28, 2008

Case 3:08-cv-00339-CRB Document 32 Filed 03/28/08 Page 3 of 3