Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01277/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01277-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 2:19-CV-01277-MCE-AC 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME FOR NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

Matthew G. Ball (SBN 2088811) 

matthew.ball@klgates.com 

Jason N. Haycock (SBN 278983) 

jason.haycock@klgates.com 

K&L GATES LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 882-8200 

Facsimile: (415) 882-8220 

Attorneys for Defendant 

National Australia Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

THOMAS KENT, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CENTURY MANOR TRUST TEXAS 

LIMITED; et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 2:19-CV-01277-MCE-AC 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT NATIONAL 

AUSTRALIA BANK TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

Case 2:19-cv-01277-MCE-AC Document 57 Filed 01/08/20 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 2:19-CV-01277-MCE-AC 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME FOR NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

 Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 144(a), and subject to the Court’s approval, Plaintiff Mr. Thomas 

Kent (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant National Australia Bank (“NAB”) hereby stipulate and request as 

follows: 

WHEREAS, the initial date for NAB to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint was November 6, 

2019; 

WHEREAS, on October 30, 2019, Magistrate Judge Claire issued a Report and 

Recommendation, recommending that the matter be dismissed as to all Defendants, Dkt. No. 45; 

WHEREAS, the Report and Recommendation did not expressly stay all other matters pending 

Judge England’s ruling on the Report and Recommendation, id.; 

WHEREAS, on November 5, 2019, NAB requested and Plaintiff agreed to, an automatic 28-

day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), making NAB’s 

response due December 4, 2019, Dkt. No. 49; 

WHEREAS, on November 26, 2019, NAB requested and Plaintiff agreed to an additional 

thirty-seven (37) day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint, making the response due 

January 10, 2020; Dkt. Nos. 54, 55. 

WHEREAS, in light of the District Judge’s forthcoming ruling on Magistrate Judge Claire’s 

Report and Recommendation, which is likely to resolve the case in light of the fact that no parties 

objected, NAB and Plaintiff agree to an additional forty-five (45) day extension of time for NAB to 

respond to Plaintiff’s complaint; 

NOW THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, NAB and Plaintiff hereby stipulate and 

agree that the time within which NAB shall have to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint shall be extended 

by forty-five (45) days to February 24, 2020. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 2:19-cv-01277-MCE-AC Document 57 Filed 01/08/20 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 2:19-CV-01277-MCE-AC 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME FOR NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

DATED: January 7, 2020 K&L GATES LLP 

 By: /s/ Jason N. Haycock 

 JASON N. HAYCOCK 

 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK 

DATED: January 7, 2020 

 By: 

 THOMAS KENT 

 

Plaintiff pro se 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that: 

National Australia Bank’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due on February 24, 2020. 

Dated: January 7, 2020 

 

Case 2:19-cv-01277-MCE-AC Document 57 Filed 01/08/20 Page 3 of 3