Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04086/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04086-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTION TO DISMISS

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-04086-JSW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

Laura Kabler Oswell (State Bar No. 241281) 

Thomas E. Fullerton (State Bar No. 305104) 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1870 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Telephone: (650) 461-5600 

Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 

Garrard R. Beeney (appearance pro hac vice) 

Laura R. Paliani (appearance pro hac vice) 

Malaika R. Staten (appearance pro hac vice) 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

125 Broad Street 

New York, New York 10004 

Telephone: (212) 558-4000 

Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

VIA LICENSING CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PEGATRON CORPORATION, PEGATRON 

TECHNOLOGY SERVICE INC. and UNIHAN 

CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 4:15-cv-04086-JSW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS____________ 

Case 4:15-cv-04086-JSW Document 38 Filed 12/17/15 Page 1 of 3 Case 4:15-cv-04086-JSW Document 40 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 3
-1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTION TO DISMISS

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-04086-JSW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

WHEREAS, on September 8, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Breach of 

Contract, Specific Performance, and Promissory Fraud (Dkt. No. 1) (the “Complaint”); 

WHEREAS, on September 22, 2015, Defendants Pegatron Corporation, Pegatron 

Technology Service Inc. and Unihan Corporation (together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”) accepted 

service of the Summons and Complaint (Dkt. Nos. 9-11); 

WHEREAS on October 30, 2015, Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granted the 

Parties’ Stipulation to allow the Defendants until December 15, 2015 to answer or otherwise 

respond to the Complaint (Dkt. No. 13) (the “Stipulation Setting Schedule on Response to the 

Complaint”); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Stipulation Setting Schedule on Response to the 

Complaint, the Parties agreed that, if Defendants file any motion in response to the Complaint, 

the Parties will meet and confer on a briefing schedule; 

WHEREAS on December 15, 2015, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss 

Count III of the Complaint (Dkt. No. 35) (the “Motion to Dismiss”); 

WHEREAS the Parties have met and conferred on such briefing schedule. 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between 

Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, that: 

1. Plaintiff shall have until and including January 22, 2016 to file an 

opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. 

2. Defendants shall have until and including February 5, 2016 to file their 

reply to Plaintiff’s opposition. 

3. The Motion to Dismiss shall be heard on February 19, 2016 at 9:00 a.m., 

or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard by the Honorable Jeffrey S. White. 

DATED: December 17, 2015 

/s/ Laura Kabler Oswell 

Laura Kabler Oswell

Thomas E. Fullerton

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1870 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 461-5600 

Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 

Case 4:15-cv-04086-JSW Document 38 Filed 12/17/15 Page 2 of 3 Case 4:15-cv-04086-JSW Document 40 Filed 12/18/15 Page 2 of 3
-2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTION TO DISMISS

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-04086-JSW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

Garrard R. Beeney (appearance pro hac vice)

Laura R. Paliani (appearance pro hac vice) 

Malaika R. Staten (appearance pro hac vice)

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

125 Broad Street

New York, New York 10004 

Telephone: (212) 558-4000 

Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 

Attorneys for Plaintiff VIA LICENSING 

CORPORATION

DATED: December 17, 2015. 

/s/ Ronald S. Lemieux (w/permission by LKO)

Ronald S. Lemieux (CA Bar No. 120822)

Vid R. Bhakar (CA Bar No. 220210) 

Lenny Huang (CA Bar No. 264386)

SINGULARITY LLP

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Ste. 610 

Redwood Shores, California 94065 

Telephone: (650) 720-4650 

Facsimile: (650) 720-4662 

Attorneys for Defendants PEGATRON 

CORPORATION, PEGATRON TECHNOLOGY 

SERVICE INC. and UNIHAN CORPORATION

* * * 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ___________, 2015. _______________________________________ 

 The Hon. Jeffrey S. White 

 United States District Judge 

 Northern District of California 

Case 4:15-cv-04086-JSW Document 38 Filed 12/17/15 Page 3 of 3

December 18 The motion to dismiss shall be heard on February 19, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.

Case 4:15-cv-04086-JSW Document 40 Filed 12/18/15 Page 3 of 3