Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00540/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00540-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1986 Neglect of Duty

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL WELDON,

Plaintiff,

v.

JERRY DYER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-00540-LJO-SAB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

ECF NO. 49

On May 19, 2014, Plaintiff Paul Weldon (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion “For Leave to File 

Brief in Opposition to Defendants ... Motion to Dismiss ... Out of Time.” (ECF No. 49.) 

Plaintiff’s motion appears to request leave to file a late opposition to Defendants’ motion to 

dismiss.

Plaintiff filed his motion concurrently with his opposition. Under Local Rule 230(c), 

oppositions to motions must be filed “not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed (or 

continued) hearing date.” The hearing date for Defendants’ motion to dismiss is June 4, 2014, 

making Plaintiff’s opposition due on May 20, 2014. Therefore, Plaintiff’s opposition filed on 

May 19, 2014 was not untimely and Plaintiff’s motion is unnecessary.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 1:13-cv-00540-LJO-SAB Document 53 Filed 06/04/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Based upon the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion to file a late opposition is DENIED as it is 

unnecessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 4, 2014 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00540-LJO-SAB Document 53 Filed 06/04/14 Page 2 of 2