Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01331/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01331-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES CATO, JR.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS AND 

REHABILITATION, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 1:12-cv-1331-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

COURT ORDER 

(ECF No. 29)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 

rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 9 & 14.) The action 

proceeds against Defendants Brambaugh and Nash on Plaintiff’s First Amendment 

claim. (ECF Nos. 15 & 17.)

On September 25, 2014, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF 

No. 26.) On October 22, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion (ECF No. 29), seeking an order 

requiring officials at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility to facilitate the 

copying of Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion. Plaintiff states that the senior law 

Case 1:12-cv-01331-LJO-MJS Document 33 Filed 12/04/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

librarian refused to copy the motion based upon the contents of the attached exhibits.

Plaintiff since has filed his opposition to Defendants’ motion and the attached 

exhibits. (ECF No. 32.) Accordingly, his motion for court order (ECF No. 29) is HEREBY 

DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 3, 2014 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01331-LJO-MJS Document 33 Filed 12/04/14 Page 2 of 2