Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01285/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01285-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT LEE ROBINS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-01285-AWI-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 15)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Robert Lee Robins, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 16, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. On January 17, 2007, Plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:05-cv-01285-GSA Document 19 Filed 03/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis. In his

objections, Petitioner requests that the court not dismiss this

action. As explained in the Findings and Recommendations, the

court is only dismissing certain claims that Petitioner chose not

to amend. This action will still proceed on the Eighth

Amendment claim.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 16,

2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The action proceed solely on the Eighth Amendment claim

of cruel and unusual punishment against Defendant

Correctional Officers Adams and Silva;

3. All other claims and Defendants are DISMISSED;

4. This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for

further proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01285-GSA Document 19 Filed 03/14/07 Page 2 of 2