Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00276/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00276-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS CALDERON,

Petitioner,

v.

FREDERIC FOULKS,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:16-cv-00276-LJO-SAB-HC

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO 

SHOW CAUSE (ECF No. 19)

ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO 

FILE STATE HABEAS PETITION

On August 16, 2016, the Court stayed the instant proceedings and ordered Petitioner to 

file a status report within thirty days. (ECF No. 18). Petitioner failed to file a status report within 

the allotted time period. Therefore, on September 29, 2016, the Court issued an order to show 

cause why the stay should not be vacated for failing to obey a court order. (ECF No. 19). 

On October 6, 2016, Petitioner filed a response, indicating that Petitioner’s counsel was 

diagnosed with a serious medical condition last year and has undergone numerous procedures.

(ECF No. 20). Petitioner also informed the court that the state habeas petition “is in final draft 

and ready to be filed in state court,” but to date has not been filed in Tulare County Superior 

Court. 

In light of Petitioner’s response, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The order to show cause issued on September 29, 2016 (ECF No. 19) is 

DISCHARGED; 

Case 1:16-cv-00276-LJO-SAB Document 21 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file the state habeas petition in the Tulare County 

Superior Court within FOURTEEN (14) days of the date of service of this order; and

3. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file a status report within NINETY (90) days of the date 

of service of this order, and then every NINETY (90) days thereafter, in accordance 

with the Court’s previous order (ECF No. 18).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 11, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00276-LJO-SAB Document 21 Filed 10/11/16 Page 2 of 2