Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03809/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03809-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT EMERSON FELIX, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KARIN L ANDERSON,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-03809-HSG 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Re: Dkt. No. 44

On July 24, 2015, Defendant Karin Anderson moved for judgment on the pleadings on the 

ground that Plaintiffs’ Complaint did not allege facts sufficient to overcome a statute of limitations 

defense. Dkt. No. 44 (“Mot”). Plaintiffs’ filed an “Opposition” to that Motion on August 12, 

2015, which conceded that “the original complaint lacks the specificity required to overcome the 

statute of limitations claim made by Defendant” and requested leave to file an amended complaint 

to address that deficiency. Dkt. No. 49 (“Opp.”) at 1-2. 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the motion is deemed suitable for disposition without 

oral argument, and the hearing scheduled for September 10, 2015 is therefore vacated. 

Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ Complaint is 

DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiffs’ must file a First Amended Complaint no 

later than 21 days from the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 20, 2015

________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 4:14-cv-03809-HSG Document 59 Filed 08/20/15 Page 1 of 1