Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00846/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00846-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 152
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Default of Student Loan

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Douglas S. Younglove, 

Defendant. 

Lerner & Rowe, PC, 

Garnishee. 

No. CV-10-00846-PHX-JJT

GARNISHMENT DISPOSITION 

ORDER 

 A Writ of Garnishment, directed to the Garnishee, has been duly issued and served 

upon the Garnishee. Pursuant to the Writ of Garnishment, the Garnishee filed an Answer 

on December 16, 2015, stating that at the time of the service of the Writ it had in its 

possession non-exempt earnings belonging to and due the Defendant and that the 

Garnishee was indebted to the Defendant. 

 On December 11, 2015, the United States of America notified the Defendant of his 

right to a hearing. The Defendant requested a hearing on the garnishment on 

December 29, 2015. (Doc. 23.) On January 12, 2016, this court referred this matter to 

Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan for the purpose of deciding the request for hearing 

and, if Judge Duncan concluded that a hearing is warranted, conducting the hearing. 

(Doc. 25.) Judge Duncan held hearings on February 16, 2016, February 24, 2016 

(telephonically), and March 8, 2016. (Docs. 27, 31, 34 and 41.) On March 10, 2016, 

Case 2:10-cv-00846-JJT Document 43 Filed 03/29/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Judge Duncan concluded that the Defendant had produced no credible or legally 

supported basis to challenge the requested garnishment and recommended that this Court 

grant the government’s request. (Doc. 40.) Despite the Report and Recommendation 

(“R&R”) warning Defendant that he had fourteen days to file any objections thereto, and 

that his failure to so “may result in the acceptance of the R&R by the district court 

without further review” pursuant to United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 

(9th Cir. 2003), Defendant filed no objection. The Court nonetheless conducted a review 

of the R&R, and upon finding the reasons supporting it legally justified and factually 

supported, 

 IT IS ORDERED adopting Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 40). 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting the United States Government’s Motion for 

Entry of Garnishment Disposition Order (Doc. 42). 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Garnishee pay the sum of 25% of the 

Defendant’s non-exempt earnings to the Plaintiff and continue withholding the 

Defendant’s non-exempt earnings and paying them to the Plaintiff until the debt to the 

Plaintiff is paid in full or until the Garnishee no longer has possession of any non-exempt 

earnings belonging to the Defendant or until further Order of this Court. Checks should 

be made payable to the Department of Justice and mailed to U.S. Attorney's Office, 

Financial Litigation Unit, 405 West Congress Street, Suite 4900, Tucson, Arizona 85701-

5041. Checks should include the Defendant’s name and Court number. 

 Dated this 29th day of March, 2016. 

 

 Honorable John J. Tuchi 

 United States District Judge 

Case 2:10-cv-00846-JJT Document 43 Filed 03/29/16 Page 2 of 2