Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02035/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02035-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MILTON CHARLES VAN NOLAND

and JOY GARNER,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-09-2035 MCE DAD PS

v.

ERIC S. PELLETIER and “GRRR! ORDER 

LIMITED,”

Defendants.

 /

On January 6, 2010, the undersigned filed an order denying several duplicative

motions filed by plaintiffs. On January 7, 2010, plaintiffs filed a document styled “Motion for

Declaration of Clarification of Court’s Order Issued January 6th 2009 and Motion for Show

Cause Order.” Plaintiffs have addressed the new motions to the undersigned “or Judge England”

and noticed them for hearing on February 5, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in an unspecified courtroom. A

review of plaintiffs’ 46-page filing reveals that plaintiffs do not seek clarification of the January

6, 2010 order. Instead, plaintiffs offer additional unauthorized briefing related to the motions for

remand that were taken under submission on September 18, 2009. Plaintiffs’ January 7, 2010

motions are denied, and the hearing set for February 5, 2010 is dropped from the court’s

calendar. All related requests and motions are moot.

Case 2:09-cv-02035-MCE -DAD Document 69 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 The court anticipates that its ruling on the submitted motions for remand will be filed 1

within the next week.

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs’ January 7, 2010 motions for declaration of clarification and for

show cause order (Doc. No. 60) are denied;

2. Plaintiffs’ related request for judicial notice filed January 12, 2010 (Doc. No.

62), motion for order shortening time filed January 14, 2010 (Doc. No. 64), motion for order

shortening time filed January 15, 2010 (Doc. No. 65), motion for judicial notice and for order

filed January 19, 2010 (Doc. No. 66), and motion for judicial estoppel and for evidentiary

hearing filed January 26, 2010 (Doc. No. 68) are denied as moot; and

3. All motions noticed for hearing on February 5, 2010 are dropped from this

court’s calendar.1

DATED: February 4, 2010.

DAD:kw

Ddad1\orders.pro se\vannoland2035.ord.vachrg2

Case 2:09-cv-02035-MCE -DAD Document 69 Filed 02/04/10 Page 2 of 2