Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-02132/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-02132-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT OF FLSA CLAIM C07-06424 JW

657205

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (#88625) 

NORA FRIMANN, Assistant City Attorney (#93249) 

ROBERT FABELA, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (#148098) 

Office of the City Attorney 

200 East Santa Clara Street 

San José, California 95113-1905 

Telephone Number: (408) 535-1900 

Facsimile Number: (408) 998-3131 

E-Mail Address: cao.main@sanjoseca.gov 

Attorneys for CITY OF SAN JOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

JEFFREY WELCH, GLEN BISHIP, 

MITCHELL WITSINSKI, ROBERT 

CULBERTSON and other employees 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

CITY OF SAN JOSE, 

 Defendant. 

Case Number: C08-02132 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT OF FLSA 

CLAIM 

WHEREAS, this is a Fair Labor and Standards Act (“FLSA”) case in which the 

Plaintiffs are asserting, based on several different theories, that Defendant City of San Jose 

has not paid Plaintiff firefighters overtime consistent with the FLSA for the last several years; 

WHEREAS, the City denies these allegations; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that the further pursuit of this action would not be of 

benefit to either party; 

WHEREAS, the parties represent that they have reached a settlement in this matter, 

which has been approved by Plaintiffs and by the San Jose City Council in closed session, 

but is subject to approval of the San Jose City Council in regular session; 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

NO: C 07-06424 JW 

NO: C 08-02132 JW 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATED 

DISMISSALS

JUAN DIAZ,

_________________________________

 On May 18, 2010 and May 21, 2010, the Court approved the parties' Stipulations re: 

Settlement of FLSA Claim, respectively in the above entitled cases. (Docket Item Nos. 57 in 

C 07-6424 and 47 in C 08-2132.) The parties represented that upon approval of the Settlement by the 

San Jose City Counsel, the parties will file the appropriate Stipulated Dismissals. To date, nearly two 

and a half months later, the parties have failed to neither file the Stipulated Dismissals to bring these 

cases to a close or update the Court on the status of the City Counsel's approval. 

 Accordingly, the Court sets September 20, 2010 at 9 a.m. as a hearing on an Order to Show 

Cause re: Settlement and Stipulated Dismissals for both cases. On or before September 10, 2010, the 

parties shall file either Stipulated Dismissals or Status Reports to update the Court on the City 

Counsel's approval of the Settlement. 

 Failure to adhere to this Order may subject both parties to appropriate sanctions. 

Dated: August 9, 2010 __________________________ 

 JAMES WARE 

United States District Judge

Case 5:08-cv-02132-JW Document 48 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 1