Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00488/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00488-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

GASPAR GARCIA, II SBN 215762

GARCIA & ASSOCIATES

1395 Garden Highway, Suite 175

Sacramento CA 95833

Telephone: (916) 568-3692

Attorneys for Plaintiffs,

Club Gravity Inc., dba Planet Rock, et al., 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLUB GRAVITY INC. dba PLANET ROCK,

RICHARD TRINH, AMPHOUVANHNA

CHANTHALAMGSY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MOHAMMED JACK MOGHADDAM, CITY

OF MARYSVILLE, MARYSVILLE POLICE

DEPARTMENT, SGT OSBORNE, GARY

PRICE, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive

Defendants. ______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: 2:07-CV-00488-GEB-EFB

STIPULATION AND EXPARTE

APPLICATION TO

WITHDRAW/AMEND PLAINTIFF’S

ADMISSIONS 

[FRCP Rule 29; FRCP 36(b)]

COME NOW Plaintiff CLUB GRAVITY INC. dba PLANET ROCK, RICHARD TRINH,

AMPHOUVANHNA CHANTHALAMGSY, by and through counsel of record, Gaspar Garcia, Esq.,

Defendant MOHAMMED JACK MOGHADDAM, by and through counsel of record, Jud

Waggoman, Esq., and Defendants CITY OF MARYSVILLE, MARYSVILLE POLICE

DEPARTMENT, SGT OSBORNE, GARY PRICE, by and through counsel of record, Dennis

Halsey, Esq.

WHEREAS Defendants CITY OF MARYSVILLE, MARYSVILLE POLICE

DEPARTMENT, SGT OSBORNE, GARY PRICE served by mail Requests for Admissions-Set Two

on July 16, 2008 on Plaintiffs;

Case 2:07-cv-00488-GEB-EFB Document 105 Filed 10/10/08 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

WHEREAS Defendant SGT OSBORNE served by mail Requests for Admissions-Set One on

July 16, 2008 on Plaintiffs;

WHEREAS for purposes of this stipulation, Defendants will not dispute plaintiffs’ assertion

that they did not receive the Requests for Admissions;

WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ Responses to Defendants CITY OF MARYSVILLE, MARYSVILLE

POLICE DEPARTMENT, SGT OSBORNE, GARY PRICE’s Requests for Admissions-Set Two

were due on August 18, 2008;

WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ Response Defendant SGT OSBORNE’s Requests for Admissions-Set

One were due on August 18, 2008;

WHEREAS the First Time that Plaintiffs’ Counsel saw the Requests for Admissions were

when Plaintiff received Defendants CITY OF MARYSVILLE, MARYSVILLE POLICE

DEPARTMENT, SGT OSBORNE, GARY PRICE Motion for Summary Judgement on September

19, 2008;

WHEREAS Plaintiff immediately wrote to Dennis Halsey, Counsel for Defendants CITY OF

MARYSVILLE, MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SGT OSBORNE, GARY PRICE on

September 19, 2008, requesting this stipulation to allow the Plaintiffs to Withdraw/Amend their

Admissions;

WHEREAS the Parties agreed that the Plaintiffs’ would be allowed to Withdraw/Amend

their Admissions and that Plaintiffs’ failure to respond to the Request for Admissions was

“inadvertent”

WHEREAS the Parties agreed that Statement of Undisputed Facts #58 in Support of the

Defendants CITY OF MARYSVILLE, MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SGT

OSBORNE, GARY PRICE’s Motion for Summary Judgement would be admitted by the Plaintiffs

because it’s the only undisputed fact in Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgement that used

“admission had been admitted” as its sole supporting evidence. All other Undisputed Facts

submitted by the Defendants had other supporting evidence cited beside that an admission had been

deemed admitted; 

Case 2:07-cv-00488-GEB-EFB Document 105 Filed 10/10/08 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

WHEREAS Plaintiffs have served concurrently with this Stipulation their Responses to

Defendants CITY OF MARYSVILLE, MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SGT

OSBORNE, GARY PRICE’s Requests for Admissions-Set Two ;

WHEREAS Plaintiffs have served concurrently with this Stipulation their Response

Defendant SGT OSBORNE’s Requests for Admissions-Set One;

 The Parties hereby stipulate pursuant to FRCP Rule 36(b) and FRCP Rule 29 (b) . 

Date: September 30, 2008 /S/ Gaspar Garcia, II 

GASPAR GARCIA, II

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Date: September 30, 2008 /S/ Jud Waggoman 

JUD WAGGOMAN

Attorney for Defendant Mohammed Jack

Moghaddam

Date: September 30, 2008 /S/ Dennis Halsey 

DENNIS HALSEY

Attorney for Defendants City of Marysville, et

al.

IT ORDERED:

That pursuant to FRCP Rule 36(b) Plaintiffs may withdraw/amend their Responses to

Defendants CITY OF MARYSVILLE, MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SGT

OSBORNE, GARY PRICE’s Requests for Admissions-Set Two;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:

That pursuant to FRCP Rule 36(b) Plaintiffs may withdraw/amend their Response Defendant

SGT OSBORNE’s Requests for Admissions-Set One;

Case 2:07-cv-00488-GEB-EFB Document 105 Filed 10/10/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:

That Statement of Undisputed Facts #58 in Support of the Defendants CITY OF

MARYSVILLE, MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SGT OSBORNE, GARY PRICE’s

Motion for Summary Judgement is admitted by the Plaintiffs.

DATED: October 10, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-00488-GEB-EFB Document 105 Filed 10/10/08 Page 4 of 4