Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02201/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02201-42/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MEDTRONIC, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

GEOFFREY WHITE,

Defendant.

 /

LOS ANGELES BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH

INSTITUTE AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL

CENTER,

Third-Party Intervenor and

Plaintiff,

 v.

GEOFFREY WHITE,

Defendant.

No. C 04-02201 JSW

ORDER OVERRULING

OBJECTIONS TO MOORE

DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS

The Court has received and considered Dr. White’s Objections To Proposed

Demonstratives For Use During The Testimony Of Dr. Wesley Moore and L.A. Biomed’s

responses thereto.

The Court overrules Dr. White’s objections subject to L.A. Biomed laying the proper

evidentiary foundations as to each of the proposed demonstratives, including a proper

foundation under Federal Rule of Evidence 703 for the slides containing Dr. Yu’s testimony. 

Further, in connection with Moore Demonstratives 55, 56, 62, 63, 64 and 131, he Court shall

give the following limiting instruction: “The evidence you are about to hear may be considered

Case 3:04-cv-02201-JSW Document 367 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

only for the limited purpose of determining whether Dr. White conceived of the overlapping

GAD-graft device while at L.A. Biomed and for no other purpose.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2006 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-02201-JSW Document 367 Filed 03/13/06 Page 2 of 2