Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00986/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00986-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C. 

333 WEST SAN

CARLOS

RIVERPARK TOWER, 17TH FLOOR

SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95110-2726 

TELEPHONE (408) 279-7000 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Daniel S. Mount, Esq. (State Bar No. 77517) 

Ron C. Finley, Esq. (State Bar No. 200549) 

Justin T. Beck, Esq. (State Bar No. 53138) 

Jeremy M. Duggan, Esq. (State Bar No. 229854) 

Mount & Stoelker, P.C. 

333 West San Carlos 

RiverPark Tower, 17th Floor 

San Jose CA 95110-2740 

Phone: (408) 279-7000 

Fax: (408) 998-1473 

Email: dmount@mount.com 

 rfinley@mount.com 

 jbeck@mount.com 

 jduggan@mount.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Nanometrics, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

NOVA MEASURING INSTRUMENTS 

LTD.,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

NANOMETRICS, INC., 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:05-cv-00986 (MMC) 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE 

TO FILE A SURREPLY REGARDING CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION; AFFORDING PLAINTIFF 

LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSE TO SURREPLY 

Case 3:05-cv-00986-MMC Document 191 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 3:05-cv-00986 (MMC) 

[Proposed] Order Page 1 

MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C. 

333 WEST SAN

CARLOS

RIVERPARK TOWER, 17TH FLOOR

SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95110-2726 

TELEPHONE (408) 279-7000 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The Court, having considered defendant’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File a Surreply 

Brief Regarding Claim Construction, plaintiff’s opposition thereto, and the arguments of counsel at 

the status conference conducted July 28, 2006, hereby orders as follows: 

 The Administrative Motion is hereby GRANTED. Defendant may, no later than August 4, 

2006, file the proposed surreply brief and supporting declaration attached to its administrative 

motion.

 Plaintiff may file, no later than August 18, 2006, a response to the surreply, not to exceed 

three pages and limited to the issue of the legal effect of the statements plaintiff made during 

prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 31, 2006 

 _________________________________________ 

 The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-00986-MMC Document 191 Filed 07/31/06 Page 2 of 2