Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00847/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00847-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint

case management statement filed in connection with a case management conference. 

Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case

management conference has not been scheduled.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID JONATHAN IRMEN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant. /

No. C 15-00847 JSW

ORDER DIRECTING

DEFENDANT TO INFORM

COURT WHETHER THEY

CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE

JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to

reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final

judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). The Court has received notice that Plaintiff consent to

reassignment. Accordingly, Defendant is hereby DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than

March 20, 2015, as to whether they consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further

proceedings in the instant action.1

 For the parties’ convenience, consent forms are available at

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section. The parties are further advised that they

may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 26, 2015 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-00847-JCS Document 11 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:15-cv-00847-JCS Document 11 Filed 02/26/15 Page 2 of 2