Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05084/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05084-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[Proposed] Order Defs.' Second Mot. Extend Time to File

Reply & Opp. Pl's Opp. & Cross-Mot. Summ. J. (C 13-05084-HSG (PR))

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SENARBLE CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

W. STRUFFERT, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C 13-05084-HSG (PR)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION FOR

AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A

REPLY AND OPPOSITION TO

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION AND

CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

On December 11, 2015, Defendants’ D. McGuirt, J. Phillips, and W. Struffert filed their

Second Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Reply and Opposition to Plaintiff’s Opposition

and Cross-motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants’ motion request is based on the following

case history.

Plaintiff was deposed on November 17, 2014. Plaintiff later moved for a protective order

barring further use of his deposition. On March 10, 2015, this Court issued a protective order

barring further use of Plaintiff’s November 17, 2014 deposition transcript. (Order Addressing

Pending Mots. 1-3, ECF No. 52.) Plaintiff was deposed for a second time on May 11, 2015. On

June 19, 2015, Defendants’ D. McGuirt, J. Phillips, and W. Struffert filed their pending motion

for summary judgment, in which they cite to testimony from Plaintiff’s May 11 deposition. (See

Decl. Ellis Supp. Defs.’ Not. Mot. & Mot. Summ. J. 1-2, ECF No. 60). Defendants, however,

Case 4:13-cv-05084-HSG Document 103 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[Proposed] Order Defs.' Second Mot. Extend Time to File

Reply & Opp. Pl's Opp. & Cross-Mot. Summ. J. (C 13-05084-HSG (PR))

inadvertently filed their summary-judgment motion along with excerpts from Plaintiff’s

prohibited November 17, 2014 deposition transcript, rather than Plaintiff’s admissible May 11,

2015 deposition transcript.

Plaintiff filed a combined opposition to Defendants’ motion and cross-motion for summary

judgment on October 20, 2015. (See Pl.’s Mot. Opp. Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J. & Cross-Mot. Summ.

J., ECF No. 83.) His combined opposition and cross-motion relies heavily on his November 17,

2014 deposition testimony. (See, e.g., Pl.’s Mot. Opp. Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J. & Cross-Mot.

Summ. J. 7, 9, 27, 42; Exs. Pl.’s Mot. Opp. Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J. & Cross-Mot. Summ. J. 56-69.)

On December 10, 2015, Defendants discovered that they had inadvertently filed excerpts of

the protected November 17, 2014 deposition transcript in place of the May 11, 2015 transcript.

Defendants promptly filed a notice of errata containing the admissible May 11, 2015 deposition

testimony as well as an administrative motion for an order removing the erroneously filed

protected material from the case docket. Defendants also moved for a 60-day extension to permit

Plaintiff time to amend his filings, and to permit Defendants time to respond to any amended

filings by Plaintiff.

The Court has read and considered Defendants’ motion for an second extension as well as

the accompanying declaration of counsel, and finds good cause exists to grant the motion.

Accordingly, Defendants’ motion for second extension of time is GRANTED.

Plaintiff may file an amended opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment within

30 days of this order. The deadline for Defendants to file their reply and opposition is continued

60 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff may not file a sur-reply to Defendants’ motion for

summary judgment without leave as outlined by the Court’s civil local rules. Plaintiff’s reply in

support of his cross-motion shall be filed no later than 14 days from the date on which

Defendants’ opposition is filed.

IT IS ORDERED

Dated: ___________________________ __________________________

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

12/18/2015

Case 4:13-cv-05084-HSG Document 103 Filed 12/18/15 Page 2 of 2