Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_10-cv-08105/USCOURTS-azd-3_10-cv-08105-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Ronald Cooke, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Town of Colorado City, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-10-08105-PCT-JAT

JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT 

INJUNCTION 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED AS FOLLOWS:

 As stated in the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, the State of 

Arizona prevailed on its claims against Defendants Town of Colorado City, City of 

Hildale, Hildale-Colorado City Utilities, Twin City Water Authority, and Twin City 

Power. Accordingly: 

 1. Judgment is entered in favor of the State of Arizona and against the Town 

of Colorado City in the amount of $50,000 as a civil penalty on the State’s claims under 

A.R.S. § 41-1491.14(B) and § 41-1491.18. 

 2. Judgment is entered in favor of the State of Arizona and against the City of 

Hildale in the amount of $50,000 as a civil penalty on the State’s claims under A.R.S. § 

41-1491.14(B) and § 41-1491.18. 

 3. Judgment is entered in favor of the State of Arizona and against HildaleColorado City Utilities in the amount of $50,000 as a civil penalty on the State’s claims 

under A.R.S. § 41-1491.14(B) and § 41-1491.18. 

 4. Judgment is entered in favor of the State of Arizona and against Twin City 

Case 3:10-cv-08105-JAT Document 704 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Water Authority in the amount of $50,000 as a civil penalty on the State’s claims under 

A.R.S. § 41-1491.14(B) and § 41-1491.18. 

 5. Judgment is entered in favor of the State of Arizona and against Twin City 

Power in the amount of $50,000 as a civil penalty on the State’s claims under A.R.S. § 

41-1491.14(B) and § 41-1491.18. 

 6. During the ten-year period beginning from the date of this Judgment, 

Defendants and their agents shall not (1) discriminate because of religion against any 

person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of the provision of services or facilities in 

connection with the sale or rental of a dwelling; or (2) coerce, intimidate, threaten, 

interfere with, or retaliate against any person in the enjoyment of his or her dwelling 

because of religion or because that person has asserted rights, or encouraged others to 

assert their rights, protected by the federal Fair Housing Act or the Arizona Fair Housing 

Act. 

 7. Defendants and their agents shall not discriminate or retaliate against 

Ronald Cooke, Jinjer Cooke, the Cookes’ children, or any witnesses who testified in the 

trial in this case because of (1) religion; (2) that person’s involvement in this case; or (3) 

that person has asserted rights, or encouraged others to assert their rights, protected by the 

federal Fair Housing Act or the Arizona Fair Housing Act. 

 8. This injunction shall remain in place for ten years from the date of this 

Judgment, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce it. 

 Dated this 4th day of September, 2014. 

Case 3:10-cv-08105-JAT Document 704 Filed 09/04/14 Page 2 of 2