Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00521/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00521-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

James J. McDonald, Jr., Bar No. 150605 

Tamara Devitt Naughton, Bar No. 209683 

FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 

18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 400 

Irvine, California 92612 

Telephone (949) 851-2424 

Attorneys for Defendant, YELLOW TRANSPORTATION, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

JASVEER SINGH; JESUS MIER; and 

TOMMIE PRUITT, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

YELLOW TRANSPORTATION, INC. DBA 

YELLOW FREIGHT; INTERNATIONAL 

BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 

UNION #439, DANIEL DRAKE, ROGER 

PRICE, FRANK VELLA and DOES 1 

through 20., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:05-CV-0521-MCE-DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ALLOW 

DEPOSITION OF TIM KROETCH AFTER 

DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 

Trial Date: October 18, 2006 

Plaintiffs Jasveer Singh, Tommie Pruitt, Jesus Mier 

(“Plaintiffs”) and defendants Yellow Transportation, Inc., 

Roger Price and Daniel Drake, by their undersigned counsel, 

stipulate for and jointly request an extension of the discovery 

cut off for the sole purpose of conducting the deposition of 

Yellow Transportation, Inc. employee Tim Kroetch. In support 

of this proposed stipulation and order, the parties state as 

follows: 

/// 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00521-RRB -DAD Document 39 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 5
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Plaintiffs noticed the deposition of defendant Yellow 

Transportation, Inc.’s employee Tim Kroetch for December 20, 

2005, before the discovery cut off date of January 20, 2006. 

2. Due to a death in his family, Mr. Kroetch was unable 

to appear for his deposition prior to January 20, 2006. 

3. Mr. Kroetch is available for deposition during March 

2006 and counsel for all parties agree to schedule a mutually 

convenient date for Mr. Kroetch’s deposition during the month 

of March 2006. 

Therefore, Plaintiff and Defendants stipulate to and 

jointly request that the Court extend the discovery cut off to 

and including March 31, 2006 for the sole purpose of conducting 

Mr. Kroetch’s deposition. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February __, 2006 LAW OFFICE OF JOHN RIESTENBERG 

 By: ___________________________ 

 JOHN RIESTENBERG 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

DATED: February __, 2006 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 

 By: ____________________________ 

JAMES J. McDONALD, JR. 

TAMARA DEVITT NAUGHTON 

Attorneys for Defendant 

YELLOW TRANSPORTATION, INC. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00521-RRB -DAD Document 39 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 5
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: February __, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH SCALIA 

 By: ____________________________ 

JOSEPH SCALIA 

Attorney for Defendants 

ROGER PRICE AND DANIEL DRAKE 

ORDER

Based upon the parties’ stipulation and good cause 

appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an extension of 

time of the discovery cut off is granted through and including 

March 31, 2006 for the sole purpose of conducting the 

deposition of Tim Kroetch. 

DATED: March 15, 2006

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00521-RRB -DAD Document 39 Filed 03/16/06 Page 3 of 5
PROOF OF SERVICE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

(CCP § 1013(a) and 2015.5) 

I, the undersigned, am employed in the County of Orange, 

State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party 

to the within action; am employed with the law offices of 

Fisher & Phillips LLP and my business address is 18400 Von 

Karman Avenue, Suite 400, Irvine, California 92612. 

On March 8, 2006, I served the foregoing document entitled 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW DEPOSITION OF TIM 

KROETCH AFTER DISCOVERY CUT-OFF, on all the appearing and/or 

interested parties in this action by placing the original

a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelope(s) addressed as 

follows: 

John M. Riestenberg 

Law Offices of John M. Riestenberg 

455 Capitol Mall, Suite 410 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Tel: (916) 443-6300 

Fax: (916) 329-3435 

Attorney for Plaintiffs,

Jasveer Singh, Jesus Mier 

and Tommie Pruitt 

Mr. Joseph Scalia 

Law Offices of Joseph Scalia 

11335 Gold Express, Suite 105 

Gold River, CA 95670 

Tel: (916) 858-2286 

Fax: (916) 852-7777 

Attorney for Roger Price 

and Daniel Drake 

Whitney F. Washburn, Attorney 

Law Offices of Whitney F. Washburn 

11341 Gold Express Dr., Suite 110 

Gold River, CA 95670 

Tel: (916) 638-8800 

Fax: (916) 638-7068 

Attorney for Roger Price 

and Daniel Drake

[by MAIL] I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice 

of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. 

Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. 

Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully 

prepaid at Irvine, California in the ordinary course of 

business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, 

service is presumed invalid if postage cancellation date 

or postage meter date is more than one day after date of 

deposit for mailing this affidavit. 

FEDERAL - I declare that I am employed in the office 

of a member of the bar of this Court at whose 

direction the service was made.

Executed on March 8, 2006, at Irvine California. 

Paula Sanchez By:

Print Name Signature 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00521-RRB -DAD Document 39 Filed 03/16/06 Page 4 of 5
5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-00521-RRB -DAD Document 39 Filed 03/16/06 Page 5 of 5