Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06540/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06540-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE VELASCO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

)

ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

CV F 04 6540 REC SMS HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION [Doc. #10]

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. #6]

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

REQUEST TO WITHDRAW

UNEXHAUSTED CLAIMS

ORDER STAYING PETITION

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On March 2, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust be GRANTED,

Petitioner’s request to withdraw unexhausted claims be GRANTED, and the petition for writ of

habeas corpus be STAYED pending exhaustion of state remedies. This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. 

Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

Case 1:04-cv-06540-LJO -SMS Document 11 Filed 04/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Petitioner is advised that the instant stay is being granted solely for the purpose of allowing Petitioner an

opportunity to exhaust Grounds One, Two and Four of the original petition.

2

The pleading should be entitled, “Status Report,” and should reference the instant case number.

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued March 2, 2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED insofar as unexhausted Grounds One, Two,

and Four are dismissed;

3. Petitioner’s request to withdraw unexhausted Grounds One, Two, and Four is GRANTED;

4. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is STAYED pending exhaustion of Petitioner’s state

remedies1; 

5. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file a status report2 within thirty (30) days of the date of

service of this order advising the court of the cases that have been filed in state court, the date the

cases were filed, and any outcomes;

6. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file a new status report every sixty (60) days after filing his

initial status report; and

7. Petitioner is GRANTED thirty (30) days time following the final order of the state courts

in which to file a motion for leave to amend the petition to include the newly exhausted claims. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06540-LJO -SMS Document 11 Filed 04/27/05 Page 2 of 2