Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00747/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00747-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STRAWFLOWER ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

RADIOSHACK CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

 /

No. C-05-0747 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPY IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On September 2, 2005, plaintiff electronically filed its opposition to defendant’s

motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s standing orders,

however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day

following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document

that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the

judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45

§ VII.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M.

Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. The parties are hereby advised that if either party fails in the future to comply

Case 3:05-cv-00747-MMC Document 49 Filed 09/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

with the Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Court may impose sanctions on the noncomplying party, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 8, 2005 MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00747-MMC Document 49 Filed 09/08/05 Page 2 of 2