Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01486/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01486-55/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re: JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION

 

This document relates to ALL ACTIONS

 /

No. C-02-1486 CW (EDL)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART LEAD PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

DISCOVERY PERIOD TO CONDUCT

DEPOSITIONS

Lead Plaintiff’s motion is granted in part to allow the deposition of the Nortel 30(b)(6)

witness to occur in January 2007, due to the witness’s prior unavailability, which provides good

cause. Also, as agreed to by the parties, Lead Plaintiff may take the deposition of Scott Parker after

the cutoff.

Lead Plaintiff’s motion is denied without prejudice insofar as it seeks a blanket extension of

the discovery cutoff due to various late-produced documents. The Court will only extend the cutoff

as to particular depositions upon a showing that particular late-produced documents establish good

cause for that particular discovery. The Court denies the motion as to the JDSU 30(b)(6) deposition

without prejudice because it is the subject of a motion for protective order (docket no.695). 

This Order disposes of Docket No. 689.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 13, 2006 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 752 Filed 12/14/06 Page 1 of 1