Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_10-cv-00120/USCOURTS-azd-4_10-cv-00120-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Debra M. Rose, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of 

Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 10-120-TUC-FRZ 

 ORDER

Plaintiff Debra M. Rose filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the Social

Security Act for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security

Administration, denying her application for Social Security disability and Supplemental

Security Income disability benefits.

This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for all pretrial

proceedings and report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1) and LRCiv 72.1 and LRCiv 72.2, Rules of Practice of the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona.

On November 4, 2010, Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Guerin issued her Report and

Recommendation, recommending that the District Court, after its independent review of the

record herein, remand this matter to the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) for further

proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. 

Case 4:10-cv-00120-FRZ Document 21 Filed 04/11/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Report and Recommendation provides a thorough factual and medical history and

procedural background and an in-depth analysis of the claims under the appropriate legal

standards.

Magistrate Judge Guerin specifically found that the substantial evidence does not support

the ALJ’s finding that Plaintiff engaged in substantial gainful activity or that Plaintiff could

perform her past relevant work as a hairdresser; that the ALJ did not follow the prescribed

method in determining whether Plaintiff’s mental impairment met or equaled a listed

impairment; that the ALJ failed to properly evaluate the July 2008 opinion of Hubert R. Estes,

M.D., and that the ALJ should consider the August 2009 report of Noelle Rohen, P.h.D.

Magistrate Judge Guerin did find that the ALJ did not mischaracterize Plaintiff’s MRI.

Defendant filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation, aguing that there is

substantial evidence of record to support the ALJ’s findings and the decision of the

Commissioner that Plaintiff did not meet the disability requirements of the Social Security Act.

The Court finds, after consideration of all matters presented and an independent review

of the record herein, including Defendant’s objection and Plaintiff’s response thereto, that the

findings of the Magistrate Judge as set forth in the Report and Recommendation, shall be

accepted and adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Court. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Guerin’s Report and

Recommendation [Doc.#18] is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and

conclusions of law by this Court;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claim for benefits is REMANDED to the

Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for further proceedings in accordance with

the Report and Recommendation.

DATED this 8th day of April, 2011.

Case 4:10-cv-00120-FRZ Document 21 Filed 04/11/11 Page 2 of 2