Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05893/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05893-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

OHS West:260387937.1 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS

(Case No. C 07 05893 RMW) 

CLIFF PALEFSKY (State Bar No. 77683) 

CAROLYN LEARY (State Bar No. 226845) 

cleary@mhpsf.com 

McGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 

535 Pacific Avenue 

San Francisco, CA 94133 

Telephone: +1-415-421-9292 

Facsimile: +1-415-403-0202 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Clement Kichuk 

GARY R. SINISCALCO (STATE BAR NO. 64770) 

grsiniscalco@orrick.com 

ERIN M. CONNELL (STATE BAR NO. 223355) 

econnell@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

The Orrick Building 

405 Howard Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 

Telephone: +1-415-773-5700 

Facsimile: +1-415-773-5759 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Business Objects Americas 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CLEMENT KICHUK, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BUSINESS OBJECTS AMERICAS, a 

corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 07 05893 RMW 

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

/// 

/// 

*E-FILED - 2/28/08*

Case 5:07-cv-05893-RMW Document 17 Filed 02/28/08 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

OHS West:260387937.1 - 2 - STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS

(Case No. C 07 05893 RMW) 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Private Mediation. 

Court Processes:

 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice Of Need For 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process:

Private ADR (please identify process and provider) 

 Private Mediation with Jeffrey Ross of Dickson-Ross, LLP is currently 

 scheduled for March 11, 2008 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

The presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

Other requested deadline: _______________________________________

Dated: February 22, 2008 

CLIFF PALEFSKY 

CAROLYN LEARY 

McGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 

By: /s/ 

Carolyn Leary 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Clement Kichuk 

Dated: February 22, 2008 

GARY R. SINISCALCO 

ERIN M. CONNELL 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

By: /s/ 

Erin M. Connell 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Business Objects Americas 

Case 5:07-cv-05893-RMW Document 17 Filed 02/28/08 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

OHS West:260387937.1 - 3 - STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS

(Case No. C 07 05893 RMW) 

[] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

 Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session: 

 90 days from the date of this order 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 

Ronald M. Whyte 

United States District Court Judge 

2/28/08

Case 5:07-cv-05893-RMW Document 17 Filed 02/28/08 Page 3 of 3