Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02670/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02670-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALBERT ERVING, JR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CDCR, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-2670 KJM AC P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action commenced November 14, 

2014. By order filed April 24, 2015, this court dismissed plaintiff’s original pleading and granted 

plaintiff leave to file, within thirty days, an amended pleading framed either as a civil rights 

complaint or a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See ECF No. 7. The court deferred ruling on 

plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis until such time that the court could determine 

whether this action would proceed in civil rights or habeas. Plaintiff was informed that “[f]ailure 

to timely file an amended pleading will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 

without prejudice.” Id. at 7. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not responded 

to the court’s order. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

Case 2:14-cv-02670-KJM-AC Document 8 Filed 06/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: June 9, 2015 

Case 2:14-cv-02670-KJM-AC Document 8 Filed 06/09/15 Page 2 of 2