Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01196/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01196-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Reynard Allen Reynolds, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Dora Schriro, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-1196-PHX-DGC (HCE)

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Petitioner Reynard Allen Reynolds’ petition for writ of

habeas corpus and United States Magistrate Judge Hector C. Estrada’s Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”). Dkt. ##1, 20. The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss

the petition. Dkt. #20 at 25. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had ten days

to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered

a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 25 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).

The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review

the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)

(“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the

subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must determine de

novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.”). The

Court will accept the R&R and dismiss the Petition/complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)

(stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings

Case 2:06-cv-01196-DGC Document 21 Filed 08/05/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge

may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or

return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge Hector C. Estrada’s R&R (Dkt. #20) is accepted.

2. Petitioner Reynard Allen Reynolds’ petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt.

#20) is dismissed.

3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.

DATED this 4th day of August, 2008.

Case 2:06-cv-01196-DGC Document 21 Filed 08/05/08 Page 2 of 2