Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03672/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03672-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ELIZABETH HOPKINS, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

No. C 04-03672 SI

ORDER RE: SANDISK DISCOVERY

On September 12, 2005, plaintiff filed a letter brief seeking to compel certain third-party deponents

to provide deposition testimony in accordance with subpoenas served on them. On September 13, 2005, the

potential deponents, affiliated with SanDisk Corporation, filed a “Notice of Intention to File Opposition to

Motion to Compel,” stating an intention to file their opposition papers on September 19, 2005. This problem

has been building for about a month now, and the dates are relevant because discovery currently cuts off on

September 15, 2005.

The Court will entertain the SanDisk opposition papers on September 19, 2005 as requested, and will

undertake to resolve the dispute promptly thereafter. Should the Court’s order be that the depositions should

properly be compelled, the Court will grant an appropriate extension of the discovery cutoff to allow themto

be taken.

Dated: September 13, 2005 

 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03672-SI Document 118 Filed 09/13/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ELIZABETH HOPKINS, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

No. C 04-03672 SI

ORDER RE: SANDISK DISCOVERY

On September 12, 2005, plaintiff filed a letter brief seeking to compel certain third-party deponents

to provide deposition testimony in accordance with subpoenas served on them. On September 13, 2005, the

potential deponents, affiliated with SanDisk Corporation, filed a “Notice of Intention to File Opposition to

Motion to Compel,” stating an intention to file their opposition papers on September 19, 2005. This problem

has been building for about a month now, and the dates are relevant because discovery currently cuts off on

September 15, 2005.

The Court will entertain the SanDisk opposition papers on September 19, 2005 as requested, and will

undertake to resolve the dispute promptly thereafter. Should the Court’s order be that the depositions should

properly be compelled, the Court will grant an appropriate extension of the discovery cutoff to allow themto

be taken.

Dated: September 13, 2005 

 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03672-SI Document 118 Filed 09/13/05 Page 2 of 2