Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00004/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00004-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

______________________________________________________________________________ 

SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATE OF MOTIONS TO 

DISMISS: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 LJO JLT

- 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GREGORY J. BROD, CSB 184456

MARKUS WILLOUGHBY, CSB 197478

WILLOUGHBY BROD, LLP

96 Jessie Street

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone (415) 397-1130

Facsimile (415) 397-2121

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DANA SMITHEE, E.M., 

a minor by and through guardian 

ad litem JENNIFER MONTES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DANA SMITHEE, “E.M.”, a minor, by and 

through her guardian ad litem, JENNIFER 

MONTES,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION, PRATAP NARAYAN, 

KARIN CELOSSE, JENNIFER SEYMOUR, 

RHONDA LITT-STONER, and DOES 1 

through 200,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 LJO JLT

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING 

DATE OF MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

Case 1:19-cv-00004-JLT-CDB Document 72 Filed 02/25/20 Page 1 of 4
______________________________________________________________________________ 

SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATE OF MOTIONS TO 

DISMISS: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 LJO JLT

- 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On or about January 30, 2020, Defendant PRATAP NARAYAN filed a Motion to 

Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint (Document 66) (hereinafter referred to as the 

“NARAYAN Motion”). On or about January 30, 2020, Defendants KARIN CELOSSE, 

JENNIFER SEYMOUR, RHONDA LITT-STONER filed a Motion to Dismiss the Fourth 

Amended Complaint (Document 67) (hereinafter referred to as the “C.C.I. Defendants’ 

Motion”). The hearing date for both motions is currently set for March 9, 2020. 

The parties have agreed to continue the hearing date to March 31, 2020, or to a date 

convenient to this Court. In addition, plaintiffs’ oppositions to the NARAYAN Motion and the 

C.C.I. Defendants’ Motion would be due on or by March 10, 2020, with reply briefs due on or 

by March 24, 2020. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February 20, 2020 WILLOUGHBY BROD, LLP 

By: /S/ Gregory J. Brod 

GREGORY J. BROD

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

 DANA SMITHEE, E.M., 

 a minor by and through guardian 

 ad litem JENNIFER MONTES

Dated: February 20, 2020 BEESON TERHORST, LLP 

By: S/ Jeffrey E. Beeson ________ 

JEFFREY E. BEESON, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendant

 PRATAP NARAYAN, M.D. 

 

Case 1:19-cv-00004-JLT-CDB Document 72 Filed 02/25/20 Page 2 of 4
______________________________________________________________________________ 

SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATE OF MOTIONS TO 

DISMISS: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 LJO JLT

- 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: February 20, 2020 XAVIER BECERRA

Attorney General of California

JON S. ALLIN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

By:____ S/ Jeremey Duggan___________ 

JEREMY DUGGAN

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants Celosse,

Litt-Stoner, Seymour 

Case 1:19-cv-00004-JLT-CDB Document 72 Filed 02/25/20 Page 3 of 4
______________________________________________________________________________ 

SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATE OF MOTIONS TO 

DISMISS: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 LJO JLT

- 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] ORDER

Good cause appearing, the parties’ stipulation to allow the continuance of the hearing 

date for the motions to dismiss is GRANTED. The hearing for the two motions to dismiss,

currently set for March 9, 2020 at 9:30 a.m., is continued to March 31, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. 

Plaintiffs are to file any opposition to the motions to dismiss by March 10, 2020, and any reply 

briefs due on or by March 24, 2020. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 25, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-00004-JLT-CDB Document 72 Filed 02/25/20 Page 4 of 4