Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00230/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00230-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANNY SAUL ROSALES, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-03-0230 GEB KJM P

vs.

DIANE BUTLER, Warden, et al., 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

On July 1, 2005, respondent filed an answer to the petition for a writ of habeas

corpus with exhibits A through E, each with several subparts. 

Local Rule 5-133(f) provides in part:

A person who electronically files attachments or exhibits that total

in excess of 50 pages must also provide a paper courtesy copy to

chambers by delivering it to the Clerk. 

On July 5, 2005, this court received the courtesy copies of exhibits A and C to

respondent’s answer, but did not receive courtesy copies of exhibits B, D, or E. Morever the

courtesy copies of exhibits A and C are incomplete. For example, in exhibit A, Bates-stamped

pages 76-95 of part 4 are missing, as is all of part 5 (Bates stamped pages 96-120), and Batesstamped pages 121-129 of part 6. Moreover, in exhibit C, part 33, the courtesy copy includes

Bates-stamped page numbers 177-200, which are not part of the electronically filed document. 

Case 2:03-cv-00230-JAM -CKD Document 26 Filed 07/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These examples are not exhaustive, but merely illustrative of the problems with the courtesy

copies. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this

order, respondent shall provide a complete courtesy copy of all the exhibits electronically filed,

even those which do not of themselves exceed fifty pages. Should respondent’s counsel wish,

the courtesy copies previously provided will be returned to her if she arranges for their retrieval. 

DATED: July 18, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

rosa0230.cc

Case 2:03-cv-00230-JAM -CKD Document 26 Filed 07/19/05 Page 2 of 2