Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04962/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04962-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:185 Employee Pension Plan

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(Proposed) ORDER AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT 1

ERSKINE & TULLEY

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

MICHAEL J. CARROLL (St. Bar #50246)

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 303

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 392-5431

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., 

Plaintiff,

vs.

RICHARD PINOCCI, etc., 

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. C 06 4962 SI

ORDER AND DEFAULT

JUDGMENT

(Proposed Form)

Good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED that

default judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff, NORTHWEST

ADMINISTRATORS, INC., against defendant, RICHARD PINOCCI, an

individual, doing business as ITALIAN FRENCH BAKING COMPANY and as

ITALIAN FRENCH BAKING CO., as follows:

1. Principal $ 395.36

2. Interest 12.16

3. Attorneys fees 720.00

4. Costs 450.00

TOTAL: $ 1,577.52

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED in light of the

Case 3:06-cv-04962-SI Document 28 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:06-cv-04962-SI Document 30 Filed 10/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

decision in International Union of Operating Engineers v. Richard

D. Karr, No. 91-35846 (9th Cir. 1993), that the only issue raised

in this proceeding through the date of this default judgment is the

failure of defendant to pay known delinquent contributions for the

month of July 2006 based upon unaudited financial information. The

Court allows plaintiff to reserve its right to audit the defendant

employer for any periods not previously audited, including the time

period referred to above. Entry of the Judgment has no effect

whatsoever on either (a) plaintiff's right to audit defendant and

collect by subsequent legal action any sum found thereby to be due,

or (b) plaintiff's right to collect by subsequent legal action any

sums found to be due for any time period other than the one

referred to above.

Date:___________________

 _____________________________________

Judge Susan Illston 

Case 3:06-cv-04962-SI Document 28 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 2 of 2

9/28/07

Case 3:06-cv-04962-SI Document 30 Filed 10/02/07 Page 2 of 2