Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05114/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05114-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

GARY LAMON PUGH PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-5114

 

DR. HOWARD DEFENDANT

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Gary Lamon Pugh filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He proceeds

pro se and in forma pauperis. 

Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment (Doc. 32). To assist plaintiff in responding

to the motion, the undersigned entered an order (Doc. 35) directing Pugh to complete, sign and return

an attached questionnaire that would serve as his response to the summary judgment motion.

The plaintiff’s response to the questionnaire was to be returned by February 5, 2008. To

date, the plaintiff has failed to respond to the questionnaire. Plaintiff has not sought an extension of

time to respond to the questionnaire. Plaintiff has not communicated with the court in anyway. The

court's order was not returned to the court as undeliverable.

I therefore recommend plaintiff's claims be dismissed on the grounds he has failed to

prosecute this action and comply with the order of the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The parties

have ten days from receipt ofthe report and recommendation in which to file written objections

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of

the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that objections must be both

timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court.

DATED this 12th day of February 2008.

/s/ J. Marschewski 

HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-05114-JLH Document 36 Filed 02/12/08 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>