Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00660/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00660-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIONEL FALCON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

)

)

v. )

)

)

)

)

LYDIA C. HENSE, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:09-CV-00660 OWW GSA HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

[Doc. #12]

ORDER DISMISSING GROUND ONE

FROM PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS

ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

ORDER REFERRING MATTER BACK TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FURTHER

PROCEEDINGS

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On April 16, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended Ground One be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from the petition for lack of merit. 

The Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. 

On May 6, 2010, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. In

accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file and having considered the objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the

U.S. District Court

E. D. California cd 1

Case 1:09-cv-00660-AWI -GSA Document 15 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

record and proper analysis, and there is no need to modify the Findings and Recommendations based

on the points raised in the objections.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued April 16, 2010, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Ground One is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from the petition; and

3. The case is REMANDED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 28, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

U.S. District Court

E. D. California cd 2

Case 1:09-cv-00660-AWI -GSA Document 15 Filed 05/28/10 Page 2 of 2