Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01831/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01831-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT N. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-12-1831 KJM EFB

 v. 

HARRY FERRONI ENTERPRISES,

et al., ORDER

Defendants. 

______________________________/

On October 17, 2012, plaintiff filed notice that this case had settled and

represented that dispositional documents would be filed within twenty days of the date of that

notice. ECF No. 7. On November 16, 2012, beyond the twenty days originally sought, plaintiff

filed a request for an extension of time until December 10, 2012, saying only that the parties

were “in the process of finalizing a settlement agreement and require longer than the 30 day

grace period.” ECF No. 10. The court granted the request. ECF No. 11. On December 12,

2012, again after the additional time requested, plaintiff filed a second request for an extension

of time, again saying the same thing: that the parties “are in the process of finalizing a settlement

agreement and require longer than the thirty day grace period.” ECF No. 12.

/////

/////

1

Case 2:12-cv-01831-KJM-EFB Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Under Local Rule 160, this court may “on good cause shown, extend the time for

filing the dispositional papers. A failure to file dispositional papers on the date prescribed by the

Court may be grounds for sanctions.” Plaintiff has not only filed both extension requests late,

he has utterly failed to show good cause for the requests. Accordingly, the request (ECF No. 12)

is denied and plaintiff is directed to show cause within fourteen days of the date of this order

why he should not be subject to monetary sanctions or dismissal for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 5, 2013.

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:12-cv-01831-KJM-EFB Document 13 Filed 01/07/13 Page 2 of 2