Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04396/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04396-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ, 

DAREN HEATHERLY and DISABILITY 

RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION 

SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IRMA RAMIREZ, an individual; DAREN

HEATHERLY, an individual and

DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES:HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNION HOTEL INC., a California

corporation dba UNION HOTEL; LUCILLE

GONELLA as SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE of

the MARY and CARLO PANIZZERA

TRUST, 

Defendants. ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 07-04396 MEJ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT

The parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. Defendants UNION HOTEL INC., a California corporation dba UNION HOTEL,

and LUCILLE GONELLA as successor trustee of the MARY and CARLO PANIZZERA

TRUST, are granted an extension of time to and including November 15, 2007, to answer or

otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ complaint.

2. In the event defendants file a motion in lieu of an answer to plaintiffs’

complaint, the hearing on such motion shall be set on a date no sooner than 45 days from the

service of said motion.

Case 3:07-cv-04396-MEJ Document 6 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:07-cv-04396-MEJ Document 7 Filed 10/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 2

3. Defendants’ counsel further stipulates that defendants will comply with any and

all due dates dictated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Court, and/or

any scheduling order issued by the Court prior to the date on which defendants’ responsive

pleading is due hereunder.

This Stipulation may be executed in faxed counterparts, all of which together shall

constitute one original document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: October 29, 2007 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ 

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ, DAREN

HEATHERLY and DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION SERVICES:

HELPING YOU HELP OTHERS

DATED: October 29, 2007 McMILLAN & SHUREEN LLP

By: /s/ 

Jeffrey E. Duplicki

Attorneys for Defendants UNION HOTEL INC., 

and LUCILLE GONELLA 

O R D E R 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________, 2007

______________________________________________

Hon. Maria-Elena James

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cv-04396-MEJ Document 6 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 2 of 2

October 30

Case 3:07-cv-04396-MEJ Document 7 Filed 10/30/07 Page 2 of 2