Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00492/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00492-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Juan Matias Torres is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On June 3, 2016, Defendants filed a request for clarification of the Court’s May 23, 2016, 

order granting Plaintiff an extension of time to re-submit his objections to the pending findings and 

recommendations and reply to Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s objections. (ECF No. 142.) 

On May 23, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to submit amended objections and a 

reply to Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s objections, which were both separately filed on May 20, 

2016. (ECF Nos. 139, 140, 141.) Inasmuch as the Court inadvertently granted Plaintiff’s request to 

submit a reply (not authorized by the Local Rules) to Defendants’ response to their objections that 

///

///

///

JUAN MATIAS TORRES,

 Plaintiff,

v.

RALPH M. DIAZ, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00492-DAD-SAB (PC)

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST 

FOR CLARIFICATION AND STRIKING 

PORTION OF MAY 23, 2016 ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO FILE A REPLY TO 

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S 

OBJECTIONS

[ECF No. 145]

Case 1:14-cv-00492-DAD-SAB Document 146 Filed 06/06/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

portion of the Court’s May 23, 2016, is stricken. Local Rule 304(b), (d). This ruling rightfully does 

not foreclose the district judge’s consideration of Plaintiff’s reply to Defendants’ response to the 

objections should justification for filing a reply be found. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 6, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00492-DAD-SAB Document 146 Filed 06/06/16 Page 2 of 2