Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01794/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01794-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

First Ascent Ventures, Inc., a Colorado 

corporation; First Ascent Lone Tree, Inc., 

a Colorado corporation; 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

DLC Dermacare, LLC, an Arizona 

limited liability company, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-06-1794-PHX-JAT 

ORDER 

DLC Dermacare, LLC, an Arizona 

limited liability company, 

Counterclaimant, 

v. 

First Ascent Ventures, Inc., a Colorado 

corporation; First Ascent Lone Tree, Inc., 

a Colorado corporation; Peter C. Hill and 

Elizabeth S. Hill, husband and wife; 

Randal A. Dick and Laura G. Dick, 

husband and wife, 

Counterdefendants. 

Pending before the Court is Dermacare’s Motion for Extension of Time for Filing 

Notice of Appeal (Doc. # 108) and supplement in support (Doc. # 110). Dermacare asks 

the Court to treat its timely Motion for Attorneys’ Fees as a timely motion under Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 59 for the purposes of calculating the time for appeal under 

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). Dermacare represents that counsel for 

Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants do not oppose the proposed extension. The Court therefore 

grants the request pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(c)(2). 

Case 2:06-cv-01794-JAT Document 111 Filed 02/07/07 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Dermacare’s Motion for Extension of Time for 

Filing Notice of Appeal (Doc. # 108). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Dermacare’s Motion for Award of Attorneys’ 

Fees shall have the same effect under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4) as a 

timely motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. 

 Dated this 6th day of February, 2007. 

Case 2:06-cv-01794-JAT Document 111 Filed 02/07/07 Page 2 of 2