Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00403/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00403-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY MARTINOVSKY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-00403-MMC 

ORDER CONSTRUING DEFENDANTS' 

REQUEST AS MOTION TO CHANGE

TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 

RULE 6-3; DENYING REQUEST 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Re: Dkt. No. 20

The Court is in receipt of defendants’ “Request for Continuance of Case 

Management Conference Pending Hearing of Dispositive Motion” (hereinafter, 

“Request”), filed April 7, 2016, which Request the Court hereby construes as a motion to 

change time. See Civil L.R. 6-1 (providing “A Court order is required for any enlargement 

or shortening of time that alters an event or deadline already fixed by Court order”). Said 

request is not, however, in compliance with this district’s local rules governing such 

motions. See Civil L.R. 6-3(a) (setting forth requirements for motion to change time). 

Accordingly, the Request is hereby DENIED, without prejudice to defendants’ filing a 

motion to change time in compliance with the applicable local rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 7, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-00403-MMC Document 22 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 1