Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01822/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01822-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CASE NO. 3:14-cv-01822-CRB

ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Samuel Lasser (SBN - 252754)

slasser@edelson.com

EDELSON PC

1934 Divisadero Street

San Francisco, California 94115

Tel: 415.994.9930

Fax: 415.776.8047

Jay Edelson (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

 jedelson@edelson.com 

Rafey S. Balabanian (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

 rbalabanian@edelson.com

Benjamin S. Thomassen (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

 bthomassen@edelson.com

Amir Missaghi (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

 amissaghi@edelson.com

EDELSON PC

350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300

Chicago, Illinois 60654

Tel: 312.589.6370

Fax: 312.589.6378

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOSHUA SMITH

Teresa H. Michaud, State Bar No. 296329

 teresa.michaud@bakermckenzie.com

Christina M. Wong, State Bar No. 288171

 christina.wong@bakermckenzie.com

BAKER & McKENZIE LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-3802

Telephone: +1 415 576 3022

Facsimile: +1 415 576 3099

Mark D. Taylor (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

 mark.taylor@bakermckenzie.com

BAKER & McKENZIE LLP

2300 Trammell Crow Center

2001 Ross Avenue

Dallas, TX 75201

Telephone: +1 214 978 3000

Facsimile: +1 214 978 3099

Attorneys for Defendants

PEGATRON USA, INC., ASROCK 

AMERICA, INC., and FATALITY, INC., 

d/b/a FATAL1TY, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JOSHUA SMITH, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

PEGATRON USA, INC., a California 

corporation, ASROCK AMERICA, INC., a 

California corporation, and FATALITY, INC., 

d/b/a Fatal1ty, Inc., a Missouri corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:14-cv-01822-CRB

HON. CHARLES R. BREYER

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING 

TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

First Amended Complaint Filed: 

July 3, 2014

Case 3:14-cv-01822-CRB Document 69 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 4
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 1 CASE NO. 3:14-cv-01822-CRB

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO AMEND

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Joshua Smith (“Plaintiff”) filed his First Amended Class Action 

Complaint on July 3, 2014, against Defendants Pegatron USA, ASRock America, Inc., and 

Fatality, Inc (“Defendants.”) (Dkt. 34.)

WHEREAS, as set forth in their March 13, 2015 Joint Case Management Statement, and in 

light of the documents and information exchanged between the parties, Plaintiff indicated his 

intention to file an amended complaint, which would dismiss Pegatron USA and add ASRock, Inc. 

as a party-defendant. (Dkt. 65 § V.)

WHEREAS, following the parties’ March 20, 2015 case management conference, the 

Court instructed Plaintiff to file his amended complaint by April 10, 2015. (Dkt. 67.)

WHEREAS, because the parties are continuing to engage in good faith and productive 

settlement discussions, the parties believe that a brief, seven (7) day extension of Plaintiff’s current 

amendment deadline (i.e., from April 10, 2015 to April 17, 2015) will provide the them with a full 

opportunity to complete their discussions, which have the potential to result in dismissal of this 

case. 

WHEREAS, the stipulation is not being filed for purposes of delay, but rather, to avoid the 

filing of additional pleadings that may be unnecessary.

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

STIPULATION

1. The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and

respectfully request that Plaintiff’s deadline to file a second amended complaint be extended by 

seven (7) days, until April 17, 2015. The reason for the requested extension of time is to provide 

the parties with a sufficient opportunity to complete their settlement discussions.

2. Three other time modifications have been previously made by stipulation in this 

matter. On May 13, 2014, and May 27, 2014, the parties stipulated that the time for Defendant to 

respond to the Complaint would be extended. (See Dkt. 19, 25.) On September 2, 2014, the parties 

stipulated that the time for Defendant to respond to the First Amended Complaint be extended. 

(See Dkt. 43.) No other time modifications have been ordered by the Court.

Case 3:14-cv-01822-CRB Document 69 Filed 04/14/15 Page 2 of 4
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 2 CASE NO. 3:14-cv-01822-CRB

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO AMEND

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. All parties agree to the stipulation as indicated by their signatures below. The

parties respectfully request that the Court approve the stipulation, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and

enter an Order thereupon. A form of Proposed Order is filed herewith.

* * *

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 10, 2015 BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP

By: /s/ Mark D. Taylor

Mark D. Taylor (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

 mark.taylor@bakermckenzie.com

BAKER & McKENZIE LLP

2300 Trammell Crow Center

2001 Ross Avenue

Dallas, TX 75201

Telephone: +1 214 978 3000

Facsimile: +1 214 978 3099

Dated: April 10, 2015 EDELSON PC

By: /s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen

Benjamin S. Thomassen (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

bthomassen@edelson.com

EDELSON PC

350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300

Chicago, Illinois 60654

Tel: 312.589.6370

Fax: 312.589.6378

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOSHUA SMITH

Case 3:14-cv-01822-CRB Document 69 Filed 04/14/15 Page 3 of 4
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 3 CASE NO. 3:14-cv-01822-CRB

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO AMEND

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

Dated: April 10, 2015

/s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen 

Benjamin S. Thomassen

ORDER

The Court having considered the above joint request, and good standing appearing 

therefore, HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff shall have until April 17, 2015, to file his second 

amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: $SULO ____________________________

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:14-cv-01822-CRB Document 69 Filed 04/14/15 Page 4 of 4