Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01429/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01429-39/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN MICHAEL BEAMES,

Petitioner,

v.

RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin State 

Prison,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:10-cv-01429-DAD-SAB

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER GRANTING-IN PART 

RESPONDENT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION 

FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE POST-HEARING BRIEF ON CLAIM 

11

(Doc. No. 212)

Before the court is a motion by respondent, through counsel Robert Gezi to extend by 

fifteen (15) days the current July 5, 2016 deadline for filing his post-hearing brief on claim 11 

responsive to the court’s February 4, 2016 order. (See Doc. Nos. 198 & 210.) Mr. Gezi states 

this extension of time, his second, is necessary to allow the undersigned time to rule on 

respondent’s related motion to seal his post-hearing brief on claim 11. 

Mr. Gezi represents that counsel for petitioner, Mr. Simon, does not object to the 

requested extension of time.

The record reflects that on July 15, 2016, the Clerk of the Court filed under seal 

respondent’s request to seal and post-hearing brief on claim 11 pursuant to the undersigned’s July 

14, 2016 order granting respondent’s motion to seal. Based thereon, the court finds good cause to 

extend the time for filing of respondent’s post-hearing brief by ten (10) days to and including July 

15, 2016. 

Case 1:10-cv-01429-DAD Document 216 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Given the extension of time afforded respondent, the court also finds good cause to extend

by ten (10) days the deadline for petitioner to file his reply brief from the current September 3, 

2016 to September 13, 2016. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent’s unopposed motion for second extension of time to file his posthearing brief on claim 11 (Doc. No. 212) is granted-in-part to and including July 

15, 2016, 

2. Petitioner’s post-hearing reply brief shall be filed not later than September 13, 

2016, and 

3. Thereupon, the matter shall be deemed submitted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 18, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01429-DAD Document 216 Filed 07/18/16 Page 2 of 2