Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01492/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01492-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[Proposed] ORDER re: Def.’s Mot. to Opt Out of the Post-Screening ADR (2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

UBALDO MIO GUTIERREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

P. REYERSBACH, ET AL.

Defendants.

2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP

[Proposed] ORDER re: Def.’s Mot. to Opt

Out of the Post-Screening ADR

Plaintiff Guterrez, an inmate proceeding pro se and under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claims that 

Defendant Pantoja violated his constitutional rights for an incident that allegedly occurred at 

California State Prison – Folsom.

On November 27, 2023, the Court issued an order referring the case to its Post-Screening 

ADR Project and staying the action for a period of 120 days. (ECF No. 23.) After investigating 

Plaintiff’s claims, Defendant moved to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project on grounds 

that a settlement conference would not be beneficial at this time.

Case 2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP Document 26 Filed 02/06/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[Proposed] ORDER re: Def.’s Mot. to Opt Out of the Post-Screening ADR (2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP)

Good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Opt Out of the 

Post-Screening ADR Project and LIFTS the stay initiated on November 27, 2023. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 6, 2024 

JEREMY D. PETERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP Document 26 Filed 02/06/24 Page 2 of 2