Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00991/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00991-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. 1

Case Number C 10-991 JF

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, ETC.

(JFEX1)

**E-Filed 3/29/10**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ANGEL ACOSTA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national

association, FIRST AMERICAN LOANSTAR, a

limited liability corporation, FINANCIAL GROUP,

a California company, entity type unknown, and

DOES 1 to 100 inclusive,

 Defendants.

Case Number C 10-991 JF (PVT)

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING 1

ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION AND PRESERVING

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER

Plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction to restrain Defendants from taking actions that

would be adverse to Plaintiff’s interest in the subject real property. For the reason discussed

below, the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction will be continued to May 14,

2010 at 9:00 a.m. The existing temporary restraining order (“TRO”) will remain in place until

further order of the Court.

On March 8, 2010, Plaintiff Angel Acosta (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action against

CORRECTED

Case 5:10-cv-00991-JF Document 27 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case Number C 10-991 JF

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, ETC.

(JFEX1)

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., First American Loanstar, LLC, and Financial Group (collectively,

“Defendants”). The dispute arises out of a mortgage transaction in which Defendants allegedly

violated the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., the Real Estate and

Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., and several provisions of

California law, including California Civil Code §§ 2923.5 and 2924.

Plaintiff purchased the property at issue through funds obtained in a mortgage

transaction involving Wells Fargo and Financial Group. Plaintiff did not stay current with his

required loan payments, and a trustee’s sale was scheduled for March 10, 2010. On March 9,

2010, Plaintiff moved for a TRO and an order to show cause why Defendants should not be

enjoined from selling, transferring, conveying, or foreclosing on the property. On March 10,

2010, the district judge initially assigned to the case, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton, issued a TRO

effective through March 21, 2010. Judge Hamilton also ordered that the case be transferred to

the San Jose Division. The case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull. On

March 19, 2010, Judge Trumbull issued an order directing that the case be reassigned to a

district judge. On the same day, this Court extended the TRO through March 26, 2010 so that it

could consider in an orderly fashion the merits of Plaintiff’s application for preliminary

injunctive relief. 

As of the hearing on March 26, 2010, no defendant had appeared in the case. 

Accordingly, the Court will continue the hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction to

May 14, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. The TRO will remain in place until further order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: 3/29/ 2010

 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00991-JF Document 27 Filed 03/29/10 Page 2 of 2