Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-02185/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-02185-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Case No. 5:12-CV-2185 EJD

962934 

YAR R. CHAIKOVSKY (SB# 175421) 

yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com 

HONG S. LIN (SB# 249898) 

honglin@paulhastings.com 

PHILIP OU (SB# 259896) 

philipou@paulhastings.com 

PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

1117 S. California Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1106 

Telephone: 1(650) 320-1800 

Facsimile: 1(650) 320-1900 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs ROVI 

CORPORATION, ROVI GUIDES, INC. and 

UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ROVI CORPORATION, ROVI GUIDES, 

INC., and UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, 

INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ROKU, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 5:12-cv-02185-EJD

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

Judge: Hon. Edward J. Davila 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward J. Davila

8/7/2015

Case 5:12-cv-02185-EJD Document 36 Filed 08/07/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Case No. 5:12-CV-2185 EJD

962934 

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Rovi Corporation, Rovi Guides, Inc. and United Video Properties, Inc. 

hereby voluntarily dismiss all remaining claims against Roku, Inc. in the above-referenced action 

without prejudice. 

This dismissal is prompted by the decision in Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corp. et al., Case No. 

4:11-cv-06591-PJH on July 15, 2015 finding the claims of the ‘762 patent asserted against Netflix 

invalid under Section 101. Rovi disagrees with the decision in the Netflix case and expects to file 

an appeal shortly. In the meantime, Rovi has dismissed its claims against Roku without 

prejudice. 

 

Dated: August 6, 2015 

By:

PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

/s/ Yar R. Chaikovsky

 YAR R. CHAIKOVSKY 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ROVI 

CORPORATION; ROVI GUIDES, INC.; 

and UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC.

 

Case 5:12-cv-02185-EJD Document 36 Filed 08/07/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Case No. 5:12-CV-2185 EJD

962934 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s ECF 

System. 

Dated: August 6, 2015 /s/ Yar R. Chaikovsky 

Yar R. Chaikovsky

LEGAL_US_W # 82541367.1 

Case 5:12-cv-02185-EJD Document 36 Filed 08/07/15 Page 3 of 3