Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01507/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01507-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING SILICONIX'S AFF. DEFS.

CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

David Eiseman (Cal. Bar No. 114758) 

davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com

Albert P. Bedecarre (Cal. Bar No. 148178) 

albedecarre@quinnemanuel.com

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SILICONIX INCORPORATED 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Brent Caslin (Cal. Bar No. 198682) 

bcaslin@kirkland.com

Nick Saros (Cal. Bar No. 209922) 

nsaros@kirkland.com

Chris Almand (Cal. Bar No. 222755 ) 

calmand@kirkland.com

777 South Figueroa Street, Floor 37 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (213) 680-8400 

Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

William A. Streff, Jr. (Ill. Bar No. 2753979) 

wstreff@kirkland.com

Paul R. Steadman (pro hac vice) 

psteadman@kirkland.com

Tomoko Itoga (Cal. Bar No. 207097) 

titoga@kirkland.com

200 East Randolph Drive 

Chicago, Illinois 60601-6636 

Telephone: (312) 861-2000 

Facsimile: (312) 861-2200 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

DENSO CORPORATION and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SILICONIX INCORPORATED, a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DENSO CORPORATION, a Japanese 

corporation, and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC., a 

Michigan corporation, 

 Defendants. 

_______________________________________

AND CONSOLIDATED ACTION 

NOS. C 04-00344 WHA and C 05-03617 WHA.

CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING SILICONIX’S 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO THE 

COUNTERCLAIMS BROUGHT BY 

DENSO CORPORATION AND TD SCAN 

(U.S.A.), INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 126 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 1 of 5
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 129 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING SILICONIX'S AFF. DEFS.

-2- CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, on June 23, 2005 Siliconix incorporated (“Siliconix”) alleged in its Amended 

Complaint against DENSO CORPORATION (“DENSO”) and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC. (“TD 

SCAN”) that DENSO and TD SCAN infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,094,785. 

WHEREAS, DENSO and TD SCAN separately answered the Amended Complaint and each 

alleged two Counterclaims against Siliconix, requesting a declaration of non-infringement and a 

declaration of invalidity of the ‘785 patent. 

WHEREAS, on September 12, 2006, Siliconix served and filed responsive pleadings titled 

“Siliconix incorporated’s Reply and Affirmative Defenses to DENSO CORPORATION’S 

Counterclaims” and “Siliconix incorporated’s Reply and Affirmative Defenses to TD SCAN 

(U.S.A.), INC.’s Counterclaims,” and in each of these two responsive pleadings raised four 

Affirmative Defenses to the Counterclaims of DENSO and TD SCAN. 

WHEREAS, after a meet and confer process regarding Siliconix’s Affirmative Defenses, 

Siliconix has agreed to dismiss the Affirmative Defenses. 

WHEREAS, Siliconix continues to assert that DENSO and TD SCAN are liable for patent 

infringement, that the patent at issue in this case is valid, and all other arguments and claims 

described in its pleadings and other papers in this case remain in force except as expressly set forth 

herein; 

WHEREAS, DENSO and TD SCAN continue to assert they are not liable for patent 

infringement, that the patent at issue in this case is invalid, and all other arguments, claims, and 

defenses described in their pleadings and other papers in this case remain in force except as 

expressly set forth herein; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between 

Siliconix, on the one hand, and DENSO and TD SCAN, on the other hand, through their respective 

counsel of record, as follows: 

1. Siliconix shall withdraw all of the Affirmative Defenses raised in “Siliconix 

incorporated’s Reply and Affirmative Defenses to DENSO CORPORATION’s Counterclaims” and 

“Siliconix incorporated’s Reply and Affirmative Defenses to TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC.’s 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 126 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 2 of 5
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 129 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING SILICONIX'S AFF. DEFS.

-3- CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

Counterclaims” dated September 12, 2005, for all purposes for the remainder of this case and such 

Affirmative Defenses are hereby dismissed without prejudice. 

2. This Stipulation may not be used by any party for any purpose except to seek and 

obtain dismissal of the Affirmative Defenses identified above. 

Dated: July 14, 2006 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

By: /s/ Brent Caslin 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

DENSO CORPORATION and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC.

Dated: July 14, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

By: /s/ Albert P. Bedecarre 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-defendant 

SILICONIX INCORPORATED 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

The Honorable William H. Alsup 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 126 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 3 of 5

July 17, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 129 Filed 07/17/06 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING SILICONIX'S AFF. DEFS.

-4- CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 

and not a party to the within action. My business address is Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 777 South 

Figueroa Street, Suite 3400, Los Angeles, California 90017. 

On July 14, 2006, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING SILICONIX’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO THE 

COUNTERCLAIMS BROUGHT BY DENSO CORPORATION AND TD SCAN (U.S.A.), 

INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE on the interested parties in this action by placing true copies 

thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as set forth on the attached service list: 

[Electronic Mail] By sending the document(s) listed above via e-mail as an 

attachment in 'pdf' format to the person(s) at the e-mail address(es) set forth below. 

Chris Scott Graham, Esq. 

chris.scott.graham@dechert.com Justin F. Boyce, Esq. 

justin.boyce@dechert.com

Dechert, LLP 

1117 California Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: 650-813-4800 

Fax: 650-813-4848 

Attorneys for Advanced Analogic 

Technologies 

Peter Chen, Esq. 

pchen@mwe.com

Bijal V. Vakil, Esq. 

bvakil@mwe.com

McDermott Will & Emery 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: 650-813-5088 

Fax: 650-813-5100 

Attorneys for Panasonic Corporation of 

North America 

David Eiseman, Esq. 

davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com 

Albert P. Bedecarré, Esq. 

albedecarre@quinnemanuel.com

Diane M. Doolittle, Esq. 

dianedoolittle@quinnemanuel.com

Aaron N. Monick, Esq. 

aaronmonick@quinnemanuel.com

Carl G. Anderson, Esq. 

carlanderson@quinnemanuel.com

Emily C. O'Brien, Esq. 

emilyobrien@quinnemanuel.com

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver 

 & Hedges, LLP 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415-875-6600 

Fax: 415-875-6700 

Attorneys for Siliconix, Inc. 

[Federal] I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 126 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 4 of 5
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 129 Filed 07/17/06 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING SILICONIX'S AFF. DEFS.

-5- CASE NO. C 05-01507 WHA

court at whose direction the service was made. 

Executed July 14, 2006, at Los Angeles, California. 

/s/ Mario Aguillon 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 126 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 5 of 5
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 129 Filed 07/17/06 Page 5 of 5