Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00214/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00214-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL

WO MDR

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff,

v.

Oscar Antonio Gonzales-Garcia, 

Defendant/Movant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 12-214-PHX-GMS (DKD)

No. CR 11-1302-PHX-GMS

ORDER

On January 31, 2012, Movant Oscar Antonio Gonzales-Garcia, who is confined in the

Burnet County Jail in Burnet, Texas, file a pro se “Motion for Time Reduction by an Inmate

in Federal Custody.” In a January 31, 2012 Order, the Court advised Movant that the Court

could not construe his Motion for Time Reduction as a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c), notified Movant that the Court intended to construe his Motion for Time

Reduction as a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, warned Movant of the consequences

of such a recharacterization, and gave Movant 30 days to file either (a) a notice withdrawing

his Motion for Time Reduction, or (b) an amended “Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct

a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255).” 

On February 28, 2012, Movant filed an Amended § 2255 Motion. In a March 2, 2012

Order, the Court denied the Amended Motion because it did not comply with Local Rule of

Civil Procedure 7.1(b)(1). The Court gave Movant 30 days to file a second amended motion

that cured the deficiency identified in the Order.

. . . .

Case 2:12-cv-00214-GMS--BSB Document 10 Filed 04/03/12 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL - 2 -

I. Pending Motion

On April 2, 2012, Movant filed a Motion for Extension of 30 Days (Doc. 9). He seeks

a 30-day extension of time because he is waiting for his “final destination and the

Marshal[ will] not allow [him] to carry any paperwork with [him].” The Court, in its

discretion, will grant the Motion and will give Movant an additional 30 days to file his

second amended § 2255 motion.

II. Warnings

A. Address Changes

Movant must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Movant must not include a motion for other

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

§ 2255 action.

B. Copies

Movant must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the filing being stricken

without further notice to Movant.

C. Possible Dismissal

If Movant fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

warnings, the Court may dismiss this § 2255 action without further notice. See Ferdik v.

Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an action for

failure to comply with any order of the Court).

IT IS ORDERED: 

(1) Movant’s Motion for Extension of 30 Days (Doc. 9 in CV 12-214-PHX-GMS

(DKD)) is granted. Movant has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file a second

amended motion in compliance with this Order.

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

Case 2:12-cv-00214-GMS--BSB Document 10 Filed 04/03/12 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL - 3 -

(2) If Movant fails to file a second amended motion within 30 days, the Clerk of

Court must, without further notice, terminate Document 25 in CR 11-1302-PHX-GMS) and

enter a judgment of dismissal of the civil action (CV 12-214-PHX-GMS (DKD)) opened in

connection with the Motion for Time Reduction, without prejudice.

DATED this 3rd day of April, 2012.

Case 2:12-cv-00214-GMS--BSB Document 10 Filed 04/03/12 Page 3 of 3