Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00324/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00324-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Sutton Hatmaker 

Law Corporation

6715 N. PALM AVENUE

SUITE 214

FRESNO, CA 93704

1

STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND ORDER THEREON

SUTTON HATMAKER LAW CORPORATION

S. BRETT SUTTON 143107

brett@suttonhatmaker.com

SUSAN K. HATMAKER 172543

susan@suttonhatmaker.com

JARED HAGUE 251517

jared@suttonhatmaker.com

6715 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 214

Fresno, California 93704

Telephone: (559) 449-1888

Facsimile: (559) 449-0177

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SIMON V. GARCIA, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

* * *

SIMON V. GARCIA, an individual,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

GORDON TRUCKING, INC., a California 

Corporation, which will transact business in 

California as L GORDON; STEVE 

GORDON, an individual; BOB 

GOLDBERG, an individual; and Does 1 

through 20, inclusive, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:10-CV-00324-OWW-SMS

STIPULATION REGARDING 

PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 

DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND ORDER 

THEREON

Complaint Filed: February 23, 2010

District Judge Oliver W. Wanger

Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto

Plaintiff SIMON GARCIA (hereinafter, “PLAINTIFF”), by and through his counsel of 

record, and Defendants GORDON TRUCKING, INC., a California corporation, STEVE 

GORDON, an individual, and BOB GOLDBERG, an individual (hereinafter, collectively 

“DEFENDANTS”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as 

follows: 

Case 1:10-cv-00324-AWI-SKO Document 32 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Sutton Hatmaker 

Law Corporation

6715 N. PALM AVENUE

SUITE 214

FRESNO, CA 93704

2

STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND ORDER THEREON

I.

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, PLAINTIFF desires to file a Second Amended Complaint in order to correct 

certain formatting errors that appear in PLAINTIFF’s First Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, PLAINTIFF has provided DEFENDANTS with a copy of the proposed 

Second Amended Complaint; and

WHEREAS, counsel for both sides have conferred in good faith and hereby stipulate to 

the following:

1. Provided the Court approves, PLAINTIFF will file and serve his Second Amended 

Complaint, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” within five (5) 

days of the Court’s entry of an Order permitting the filing of same; and

2. DEFENDANTS will file and serve their Answer to PLAINTIFF’s Second Amended 

Complaint within 10 days of the filing of said Second Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: July 22, 2010 SUTTON HATMAKER LAW CORPORATION

By /s/ S. Brett Sutton

S. BRETT SUTTON

Attorney for Plaintiff

SIMON V. GARCIA

DATED: July 22, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF BRADLEY A. SILVA

By /s/ Adam Smedstad 

ADAM SMEDSTAD

Attorney for Defendants

GORDON TRUCKING, INC., STEVE 

GORDON, BOB GOLDBERG

///

///

///

Case 1:10-cv-00324-AWI-SKO Document 32 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Sutton Hatmaker 

Law Corporation

6715 N. PALM AVENUE

SUITE 214

FRESNO, CA 93704

3

STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND ORDER THEREON

II.

ORDER

Based on the above Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF shall file and serve his proposed 

Second Amended Complaint, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” 

within five (5) days of entry of this Order.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS will file and 

serve their Answer to PLAINTIFF’s Second Amended Complaint within 10 days of the filing of 

said Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 22, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

emm0d64h

Case 1:10-cv-00324-AWI-SKO Document 32 Filed 07/22/10 Page 3 of 3