Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-02774/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-02774-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FISHER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C-05-02774 CW (EDL)

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL

On December 4, 2007, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to requests for production

of documents and interrogatories, and Defendants opposed the motion on December 18, 2007. 

Plaintiff failed to file the discovery requests and responses that are the subject of his motion as

required by Civil Local Rule 37-2. On January 7, 2008, the Court issued an Order (attached to this

Order) requiring Defendants to file with the Court and serve on Plaintiff a copy of Plaintiff’s first set

of interrogatories, Plaintiff’s requests for production of documents and Defendants’ responses to this

discovery. The Court also ordered Plaintiff to file a supplemental statement in support of his motion

to compel no later than January 25, 2008 specifically stating which particular discovery requests are

at issue and why he believes responses are necessary, and gave Defendants leave to file a response

no later than February 1, 2008. 

To date, Plaintiff has not filed a supplemental statement. However, the Court is concerned

that Plaintiff may not have received notice of the Court’s January 7, 2008 Order. Therefore, the

Court will give Plaintiff one more chance to file a supplemental statement in accordance with the

Case 4:05-cv-02774-CW Document 72 Filed 02/11/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court’s January 7, 2008 Order. Plaintiff’s statement shall be filed no later than February 25, 2008. 

Defendants may file a response no later than March 3, 2008. The Court will rule on Plaintiff’s

motion to compel without a hearing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2008 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:05-cv-02774-CW Document 72 Filed 02/11/08 Page 2 of 2