Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_08-cv-08132/USCOURTS-azd-3_08-cv-08132-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The Court recognizes the one day extension.

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jesse Dupris, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

Selanhongva McDonald, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CV 08-8132-PCT-PGR CV 08-8133-PCT-PGR 

 (CONSOLIDATED)

 ORDER

Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Four-Day Additional Extension

of Time in which to Respond to Pending Motions to Dismiss. (Doc. 55.) The Court notes

that once again, counsel filed its Motion for Extension of Time on the date set by the Court

as the deadline for the filing of the Response to the Motions to Dismiss. The Court

previously advised that the Court is generally not inclined to grant such last minute motions

and will not do so again in the future. Furthermore, the Motions to Dismiss were filed on

March 8, 2010, thus Plaintiffs’ counsel has had ample time to work on the Responses, despite

the 3 1⁄2 day continuing legal education program he recently attended. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING the Motion.1

 (Doc. 55.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall respond to the pending Motions to

Dismiss no later than April 20, 2010.

DATED this 19th day of April, 2010.

Case 3:08-cv-08132-PGR Document 56 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 1