Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02385/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02385-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 In his objections, plaintiff appears to also move to amend his complaint. However, on 1

March 28, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion to amend his complaint. Thus, the motion contained in

the objections is duplicative. Plaintiff is advised that the magistrate judge will address the

motion to amend by separate order. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES HINES,

Plaintiff, 2:03-cv-2385-GEB-PAN-P

vs.

NUCKLE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 8, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. After

receiving two extensions of time, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

1

Case 2:03-cv-02385-GEB-EFB Document 71 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 8, 2006, are adopted in full;

and

2. Plaintiff's April 26, 2005 motion for summary judgment is denied. 

Dated: March 30, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-02385-GEB-EFB Document 71 Filed 03/31/06 Page 2 of 2