Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03266/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03266-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-3266 DAD P

vs.

L. FISHERMAN, et al., ORDER AND

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed February 9, 2010, plaintiff’s original complaint was dismissed and

thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The court has since granted plaintiff

several extensions of time to file an amended complaint. Most recently, on April 23, 2010, the

court granted plaintiff thirty days leave to file an amended complaint and cautioned plaintiff that

failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day

period has now expired, and plaintiff has still not filed an amended complaint or otherwise

responded to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to

randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.

Also, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Case 2:09-cv-03266-GEB-DAD Document 15 Filed 06/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 1, 2010.

DAD:sj

phil3266.fta

Case 2:09-cv-03266-GEB-DAD Document 15 Filed 06/01/10 Page 2 of 2