Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00448/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00448-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL OBERG,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAPITAL ONE BANK, USA N.A., a/k/a 

CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, LLC, 

CACH LLC, and NEUHEISEL LAW 

FIRM, P.C.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:15-CV-00448-GEB-EFB

Assigned to Courtroom 10

The Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

The Magistrate Judge ______

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT

[Stipulation filed concurrently 

herewith]

Complaint Served: 03/04/2015

Current Response Due: 05/17/2015

New Response Date: 06/16/2015

Case 2:15-cv-00448-GEB-EFB Document 10 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Stipulation filed by Plaintiff Daniel Oberg and 

Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. to extend Capital One’s time to file a 

responsive pleading by 30 days. The Stipulation is incorporated herein by reference. 

Good cause appearing thereon, the Court hereby rules as follows:

Capital One’s time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint is extended. 

Capital One shall file its responsive pleading to the Complaint on or before June 16, 

2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 18, 2015

Case 2:15-cv-00448-GEB-EFB Document 10 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 2