Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02331/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02331-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The stipulation “between Plaintiff and Defendants Omkar

Properties, Inc., and Omkar Partnership, a California General

Partnership, that . . . the deadline to file an Answer or other response

(continued...)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, )

) 2:07-cv-2331-GEB-KJM

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

v. ) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

) CONFERENCE AND RULE 4(m)

OMKAR PROPERTIES, INC., ) NOTICE

Individually and d/b/a Super 8 )

Executive Suites; OMKAR )

PARTNERSHIP, a California General )

Partnership d/b/a Super 8 Executive)

Suites; RAMESH D. PATEL, )

Individually and d/b/a Super 8 )

Executive Suites; DINESH D. PATEL, )

Individually and d/b/a Super 8 )

Executive Suites; NARENDA D. PATEL,)

Individually and d/b/a Super 8 )

Executive Suites, )

) 

Defendants. )

)

The Joint Stipulation to Modify the Order Setting Status

Conference and Extend the Deadline to Respond to the Complaint filed

December 19, 2007, states that “Defendants Ramesh D. Patel, Dinesh D.

Patel and Narenda D. Patel are all out of the country until the end of

January 2008, and therefore have not yet been served with the

Complaint.”1

 (Stip. ¶ 3.) Therefore, the Status (Pretrial

Case 2:07-cv-02331-GEB -KJM Document 7 Filed 12/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

(...continued)

to the Complaint shall be extended to February 4, 2008,” is approved.

(Stip. at 2.)

2

Scheduling) Conference set for February 4, 2008 is continued to March

17, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report shall be filed

no later than March 3, 2008.

Plaintiff is hereby notified that Defendants Ramesh D.

Patel, Dinesh D. Patel and/or Narenda D. Patel may be dismissed

without prejudice from this action under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 4(m) if those Defendants are not served by February 27,

2008. To avoid dismissal, a proof of service shall be filed for

Defendants Ramesh D. Patel, Dinesh D. Patel and Narenda D. Patel no

later than February 27, 2008. If Plaintiff believes he has good cause

to justify extension of Rule 4(m)’s 120-day service period for those

Defendants, he shall file a declaration no later than February 27,

2008, showing good cause why the action should not be dismissed

without prejudice, as to one or all of the unserved defendants. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 27, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-02331-GEB -KJM Document 7 Filed 12/27/07 Page 2 of 2