Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00272/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00272-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL ROWE,

Plaintiff, CV F 07 0272 LJO WMW PC

vs. ORDER FINDING COMPLAINT 

 STATES A COLORABLE CLAIM 

 AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF 

 TO COMPLETE USM 285 FORMS 

 MONTOYA, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915A and finds that it appears to state cognizable claims for relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 against defendants Montoya and Hadadsri for deliberate indifference to his medical

needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

NURSE MONTOYA

DR. HASADSRI

Case 1:07-cv-00272-CKJ Document 14 Filed 07/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send to plaintiff two USM-285 forms, two

summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and

a copy of the second amended complaint filed May 5, 2008.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to

the court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Three copies of the endorsed second amended complaint filed May 5,

2008. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 14, 2008 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00272-CKJ Document 14 Filed 07/15/08 Page 2 of 2