Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00704/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00704-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD A. HOLCOMB,

Plaintiff,

vs.

R. FLEEMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-00704-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 19)

ORDER DENYING REQUESTS FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Doc. 17)

Plaintiff, Richard A. Holcomb (“plaintiff”), a state

prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On November 13, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On December 1, 2006, December 11, 2006, January 12, 2007,

and March 5, 2007, respectively, plaintiff filed a motion for

extension of time. On December 13, 2006 and March 12, 2007,

Case 1:06-cv-00704-AWI-DLB Document 42 Filed 05/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

respectively, the court granted plaintiff an additional thirty

(30) days within which to respond. To date, plaintiff has not

filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 13,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief,

filed November 7, 2006, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 17, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00704-AWI-DLB Document 42 Filed 05/18/07 Page 2 of 2