Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06359/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06359-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

TIMOTHY E. JOHNSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

TIMOTHY TURMEZEI, et al., )

) 

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1: 03 CV F-6359 OWW DLB P 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION RE

DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS

IN AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 13, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. On February 2, 2005, plaintiff

filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 

Case 1:03-cv-06359-OWW -DLB Document 22 Filed 07/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 2

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 13, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. This case shall proceed against defendants Turmezei and Trott on plaintiff’s

claims for the use of excessive force and violation of equal protection and plaintiff’s ADA claim

against CDC. The remaining claims in the amended complaint are HEREBY DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 12, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06359-OWW -DLB Document 22 Filed 07/14/05 Page 2 of 2