Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02539/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02539-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION RE 

TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

MOCHA MILL, INC., MONK OF MOCHA 

SPECIALTY COFFEE PRODUCTION AND 

EXPORT, INC., IBRAHIM A. ALAELI, 

YASIR H. KHANSHALI, and ADNAN G. 

AWNALLAH, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

PORT OF MOKHA, INC., PORT OF MOKHA 

LLC, MOKHA FOUNATION, BLUE 

BOTTLE COFFEE, INC., METRA 

COMPUTER GROUP FZCO, T&H 

COMPUTERS, INC., MOKHTAR F. 

ALKHANSHALI, and IBRAHIM AHMAD 

IBRAHIM, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG 

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Courtroom 2 

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR 

RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT UNDER CIVIL LOCAL 

RULE 6-1, AND FOR BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS 

First Amended Complaint Filed: 06/03/2018

Case 4:18-cv-02539-HSG Document 26 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 2
 -1-

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION RE 

TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

On June 6, 2018, Plaintiffs Mocha Mill, Inc., Monk of Mocha Specialty Coffee Production and 

Export, Inc., Ibrahim A. Alaeli, Yasir H. Khanshali, and Adnan G. Awnallah (collectively, the 

“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Blue Bottle Coffee, Inc,. Port of Mokha, Inc. Port of Mokha LLC, Mokha 

Foundation, Mokhtar Alkhanshali, Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim, and T&H Computers, Inc. (“Defendants,” 

and all collectively, the “Parties”) filed a Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer or 

Respond to the Complaint under Civil Local Rule 6-1, and for Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss. 

This Court, having reviewed the stipulation, adopts the Parties’ proposed schedule as follows: 

1. The deadline for Defendants to answer or respond to the Complaint shall be extended 

until July 27, 2018, which will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by court 

order; 

2. In the event that any of the Defendants responds to the Complaint by filing a Rule 12 

motion, the Parties agree that the motion shall be briefed as follows: 

 (a) the motion shall be filed on or before July 27, 2018; 

 (b) any opposition shall be filed on or before August 27, 2018; 

 (c) any reply shall be filed on or before September 10, 2018. 

 (d) The motion shall be set on the Court’s calendar for argument on September 27, 2018, 

at 2:00 p.m., or such date thereafter conducive to the Court’s schedule. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 7, 2018 _______________________________________ 

 HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

Case 4:18-cv-02539-HSG Document 26 Filed 06/07/18 Page 2 of 2