Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01505/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01505-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

---

CASE NO. CIV 02-1505-DFL-PLAN 

STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

Dennis G. Rolstad, Bar No. 150006 

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 

One Market Plaza 

Steuart Tower, 8th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone (415) 781-7900 

Andrew T. Houghton, Esq. 

Timothy D. Kevane, Esq., Bar No. 156481 

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 

125 Broad Street, 39th Floor 

New York, New York 10004 

Telephone: (212) 422-0202 

Attorneys for Counterdefendants 

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, et al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

OEA, INC., and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. CIV-02-1505-DFL-PAN 

STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE; AND ORDER THEREON

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS 

Case 2:02-cv-01505-DFL-EFB Document 630 Filed 01/16/07 Page 1 of 3
CASE NO. CIV 02-1505-DFL-PLAN 

 STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

WHEREAS counterclaimant OEA, Inc. (“OEA”) and counterdefendants Certain 

Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, et al. (“Underwriters”) have settled the claims between them, 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The Ninth Claim for Relief and the Tenth Claim for Relief alleged by OEA against 

Underwriters in its First Amended Counterclaims for Damages are hereby dismissed with 

prejudice. 

2. The counterclaim for Declaratory Relief alleged by Underwriters against OEA in 

their Amended Answer is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

3. Each party shall bear their own costs and expenses incurred in this litigation. 

Dated: December 28, 2006 ANDREW T. HOUGHTON 

 TIMOTHY D. KEVANE 

 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 

 

 By _ /s/ Andrew T. Houghton________ 

Andrew T. Houghton 

Attorneys for Certain Underwriters 

for Lloyd’s of London, et al. 

Dated: January 8, 2007 JOHN L. VIOLA 

 THELEN REID & PRIEST 

 By ___/s/ John L. Viola __ 

 John L. Viola 

 Attorneys for OEA, Inc. 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Ninth Claim for Relief and the Tenth Claim for Relief alleged by OEA against 

Underwriters in its First Amended Counterclaims for Damages are hereby dismissed with 

prejudice. 

2. The counterclaim for Declaratory Relief alleged by Underwriters against OEA in 

their Amended Answer is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Case 2:02-cv-01505-DFL-EFB Document 630 Filed 01/16/07 Page 2 of 3
CASE NO. CIV 02-1505-DFL-PLAN 

 STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

3. Each party shall bear its own costs and expenses incurred in this litigation.DATE: 

1/15/2007 

______________________________ 

DAVID F. LEVI 

United States District Judge

Case 2:02-cv-01505-DFL-EFB Document 630 Filed 01/16/07 Page 3 of 3