Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00157/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00157-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

- 1 - 

 07-CV-0157-WQH-RBB 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GIVEMEPOWER CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

PACE COMPUMETRICS, INC.; TERRY 

RESNICK; JODI RESNICK; RONALD S. 

BERG; and RANDOLF WILLIS, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 07-CV-0157-WQH-RBB 

ORDER DENYING SECOND JOINT 

MOTION TO EXTEND EXPERT WITNESS 

DESIGNATION DATES AND OTHER 

RELATED DATES [DOC. NO. 74] 

 On April 2, 2008, the parties to this action filed a Joint Motion to Extend Expert Witness 

Designation Dates and Other Related Dates [doc. no. 72]. The Court, on April 4, 2008, issued its 

Order Granting in Part Joint Motion to Extend Expert Dates and Other Related Dates [doc. no. 73]. 

The Plaintiff and Defendants have now filed their SECOND JOINT MOTION TO 

EXTEND EXPERT WITNESS DESIGNATION DATES AND OTHER RELATED DATES [doc. 

no. 74]. 

 The Second Joint Motion does not show good cause for the requested additional 

extension, and it fails to demonstrate that the parties have acted diligently to meet the deadlines set 

in the Court’s Case Management Order [doc. no. 63] and Order Granting in Part Joint Motion to 

Extend [doc. no. 73]. 

Case 3:07-cv-00157-WQH-RBB Document 76 Filed 05/05/08 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

 07-CV-0157-WQH-RBB 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, the Second Joint Motion to Extend Expert Witness Designation Dates and 

Other Related Dates is DENIED. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE: May 5, 2008 

RUBEN B. BROOKS 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

ENB BROOKS

Case 3:07-cv-00157-WQH-RBB Document 76 Filed 05/05/08 Page 2 of 2