Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00120/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00120-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CESSNA EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION, et

al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

LORIMAC, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 07-00120 JSW

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

ORDER SHORTENING TIME

AND SETTING HEARING AND

BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT

OF TEMPORARY RECEIVER

Now before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to have Plaintiffs’ motion for

appointment of a temporary receiver heard on shortened time. In denying Plaintiff’s ex parte

application for a temporary restraining and request for an appointment of a receiver, the Court

found that Plaintiffs failed to make an adequate showing, supported by admissible evidence, of

immediate irreparable harm or to provide an explanation as to why they suddenly need

immediate relief. Neither Plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of a temporary receiver nor the

parties’ stipulation make any further showing on these issues. Accordingly, the Court DENIES

the request to have the motion heard on shortened time.

Despite Plaintiffs’ failure to select a hearing date in their notice of motion, the Court

ORDERS that Plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of a temporary receiver will be heard on

March 23, 2007 at 9:00 a.m., the first available hearing date on the Court’s calendar. The Court

notes that Plaintiffs’ notice of motion violates Civil Local Rule 7-2 and this Court’s Standing

Order. Plaintiffs are advised that any further violations of the Local Rules or this Court’s 

Case 3:07-cv-00120-JSW Document 34 Filed 01/23/07 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Standing Orders will be sanctioned. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that Defendant’s

opposition brief to the motion for appointment of a temporary receiver shall be due by Tuesday,

February 6, 2007 and Plaintiffs’ reply brief shall be due by Tuesday, February 13, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-00120-JSW Document 34 Filed 01/23/07 Page 2 of 2