Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00567/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00567-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John M. Polson, SBN 157820 

jpolson@laborlawyers.com

John E. Lattin, IV, SBN 167876 

jlattin@laborlawyers.com

Rafael Nendel-Flores, SBN 223358 

Rnendel-flores@laborlawyers.com

FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 

18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 400 

Irvine, California 92612 

Telephone (949) 851-2424 

Facsimile (949) 851-0152 

Attorneys for Defendants ROBERT ZAMORA and STOCKTON AUTO CARS, 

INC. dba STOCKTON HONDA (erroneously sued as ZAMORA 

AUTOMOTIVE GROUP) 

Stan S. Mallison, SBN 184191 

stanm@mallisonlaw.com 

Hector R. Martinez, Esq., SBN 206336 

HectorM@mallisonlaw.com

LAW OFFICES OF MALLISON & MARTINEZ 

1042 Brown Ave. 

Lafayette, CA 94549 

Telephone: (925) 283-3842 

Facsimile: (925) 283-3426 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, JOSE ONTIVEROS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

JOSE ONTIVEROS, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ROBERT ZAMORA and ZAMORA 

AUTOMOTIVE GROUP (form 

unknown), 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 2:08-CV-00567-LKK-DAD 

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS 

CONFERENCE 

Complaint Filed: March 12, 2008 

Trial Date: none 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:08-cv-00567-WBS-DAD Document 10 Filed 05/27/08 Page 1 of 3
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

JOSE ONTIVEROS, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ROBERT ZAMORA and ZAMORA 

AUTOMOTIVE GROUP (form 

unknown), 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 2:08-CV-00567-LKK-DAD 

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS 

CONFERENCE 

Complaint Filed: March 12, 2008 

Trial Date: none 

Upon review of the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Continue Status 

Conference, the Court finds that good cause exists to continue the currently 

scheduled status conference. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

The Status Conference, which is currently scheduled for June 2, 2008 at 

3:00pm, shall be continued to: August 18, 2008 at 11:30 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: _May 23, 2008 

 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:08-cv-00567-WBS-DAD Document 10 Filed 05/27/08 Page 2 of 3
3

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

(CCP § 1013(a) and 2015.5) 

I, the undersigned, am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the 

age of 18 and not a party to the within action; am employed with the Law Offices of FISHER & 

PHILLIPS LLP and my business address is 18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 400, Irvine, California, 

92612. 

On May 23, 2008, I served the foregoing document entitled [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE, on all the appearing and/or interested parties in this action 

by placing the original a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows: 

Stan S. Mallison, Esq. 

Hector R. Martinez, Esq. 

LAW OFFICES OF MALLISON & MARTINEZ 

1042 Brown Ave. 

Lafayette, CA 94549 

T: 925.283.3842 

F: 925.283.3426 

stanm@mallisonlaw.com

hectorm@mallisonlaw.com

Attorneys For Plaintiffs 

[by MAIL] I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing 

correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal 

Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Irvine, California in the ordinary 

course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if 

postage cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for 

mailing this affidavit. 

[by OVERNIGHT DELIVERY] - I caused a true copy of each document, placed in a sealed 

envelope with delivery fees provided for, to be deposited in a box regularly maintained by 

Federal Express. I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice for collection and processing of 

documents for overnight delivery and know that in the ordinary course of Fisher & Phillips 

LLP’s business practice, the document(s) described above will be deposited in a box or other 

facility regularly maintained by Federal Express or delivered to a courier or driver authorized by 

Federal Express to receive documents on the same date it is placed at Fisher & Phillips LLP for 

collection. 

FEDERAL - I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at 

whose direction the service was made. 

Executed on May 23, 2008, at Irvine California. 

MELODY BIGLAY By:

Print Name Signature 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:08-cv-00567-WBS-DAD Document 10 Filed 05/27/08 Page 3 of 3