Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01984/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01984-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sunglass Designs, Inc., an Arizona

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Wild Style Sunglasses; and William

Zeuner, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-1984-PHX-DGC

ORDER

On November 25, 2008, attorney Anthony Monzo sent a letter to Plaintiff’s counsel

stating that Mr. Monzo no longer represents Defendant William Zeuner. A copy of the letter

was sent to the Clerk of Court. The Clerk filed the letter on December 1, 2008. Dkt. #11.

Plaintiff has filed a motion to strike the letter from the record. Dkt. #12. Rule 7.2 of

the Local Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a motion to strike may be filed “if it seeks

to strike any part of a filing or submission on the ground that it is prohibited (or not

authorized) by a statute, rule, or court order.” LRCiv 7.2(m). The Court agrees with Plaintiff

that Mr. Monzo’s letter, standing alone and unaccompanied by a motion or other legal filing,

is not a proper document for the record. The Court accordingly will grant Plaintiff’s motion

to strike. See LRCiv 7.2(m).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to strike (Dkt. #12) is granted.

Case 2:08-cv-01984-DGC Document 15 Filed 01/08/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

2. The Clerk is directed to strike the letter from Mr. Monzo (Dkt. #11) from the

record.

3. Plaintiff’s motion for costs and fees (Dkt. #12) is denied.

DATED this 8th day of January, 2009.

Case 2:08-cv-01984-DGC Document 15 Filed 01/08/09 Page 2 of 2