Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02139/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02139-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KENNARD DAVIS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JAMES WALKER, et al., 

Defendants. 

___________________________________ 

KENNARD DAVIS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JAMES WALKER, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:08-cv-00593 KJM DB P 

No. 2:10-cv-2139 KJM DB P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

///// 

Case 2:10-cv-02139-KJM-SCR Document 365 Filed 03/21/23 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 On January 6, 2023, the magistrate judge issued an order and filed findings and 

recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that 

any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. F&R, 

ECF No. 281. Plaintiff has filed objections. Obj., ECF No. 284. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. The 

bulk of plaintiff’s objections relate to the magistrate judge’s order issued concurrently to the 

findings and recommendations. If plaintiff wishes to challenge the magistrate judge’s order, the 

proper vehicle would be a motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. Plaintiff makes no objections relating to the findings and recommendations 

pending before this court. See generally Obj. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 6, 2023, are adopted in full; 

 2. Plaintiff’s motions in case no. 2:08-cv-0593 KJM DB P to reinstate prior motions 

(ECF Nos. 263, 280) are denied; and 

3. Plaintiff’s motions in case no. 2:10-cv-2139 KJM DB P to reinstate prior motions 

(ECF Nos. 340, 356) are denied. 

DATED: March 20, 2023. 

Case 2:10-cv-02139-KJM-SCR Document 365 Filed 03/21/23 Page 2 of 2