Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05934/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05934-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICE OF IRENE KARBELASHVILI

Irene Karbelashvili, SBN 232223

Irakli Karbelashvili, SBN 302971

12 South First Street, Suite 413

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone: (408) 295-0137

Fax: (408) 295-0142

Attorneys for JOHN RODGERS, Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN RODGERS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DAJASATO BOLLES LLC, a California 

limited liability company; VICTOR M. 

SAHAGUN, an individual, and JOSE C. 

SAHAGUN, an individual, collectively 

d/b/a LA HECIENDA TAQUERIA & 

RESTAURANT; and DOES 1-10, 

Inclusive,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15-cv-5934-LB

STIPULATION AND[PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING THE 

JULY 21, 2016 CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; 

TAKING OFF CALENDAR 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL COMPLIANCE; AND 

CONTINUING THE DEADLINE 

FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

“NOTICE OF NEED FOR 

MEDIATION”

Plaintiff JOHN RODGERS (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and DAJASATO BOLLES, LLC. 

(hereinafter “Defendant”), by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed this action on December 21, 2015.

2. On June 7, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel Compliance with General Order 56

in order to be able to inspect Defendant’s property. Defendant did not file a response.

3. On July 5, 2016, the Court set a Case Management Conference for July 21, 2016 and also 

directed Defendant to confer with Plaintiff regarding holding an inspection of its property.

4. The Parties met and conferred on July 12, 2016 and agreed to allow Plaintiff’s expert to 

inspect the property on August 5, 2016.

5. Subsequently, Defendant provided Plaintiff with its own CASp report from June 30, 

2016. 

Case 3:15-cv-05934-LB Document 24 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 3
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6. After having an opportunity to review the report, Plaintiff determined that having his own 

expert conduct an inspection would no longer be necessary.

7. On July 18, 2016, Plaintiff notified Defendant of his willingness to rely on Defendant’s 

CASp report for purposes of resolving injunctive relief.

8. Plaintiff is in the process of putting together a formal settlement demand. The Parties 

believe that resources should be conserved in order to provide the best chance of resolving this 

matter through continuing negotiations.

9. For the above stated reasons, the Parties stipulate that the Case Management Conference 

set for July 21, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. be continued to October 27, 2016, at 11:00 a.m., or the first 

date thereafter that is available on the Court’s calendar, so that the Parties can continue to engage 

in settlement discussions. The Parties also stipulate that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. 18) 

be taken off calendar. Lastly, the Parties request that the Court continue the deadline for Plaintiff 

to file his “Notice of Need for Mediation” until September 15, 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: July 18, 2016 /s/ Irene Karbelashvili

Irene Karbelashvili, Attorney for Plaintiff 

John Rodgers

Dated: July 18, 2016 /s/ Norine Busser___________________

Norine Busser, Attorney for Defendant 

Dajasato Bolles, LLC

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I, Irene Karbelashvili, hereby attest that I received the 

concurrence of Defendant’s counsel in the filing of this document

By: /s/ IreneKarbelashvili

IRENE KARBELASHVILI

Case 3:15-cv-05934-LB Document 24 Filed 07/19/16 Page 2 of 3
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE 

APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference set for July 

21, 2016, is hereby continued to ___________________ at ______. The Parties’ Joint Case 

Management Statement is due no later than _____________________. It is further ordered that 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Compliance with General Order 56 be taken off calendar. Plaintiff 

is to file “Notice of Need for Mediation” no later than September 15, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________________

United States Magistrate Judge

July 19, 2016 October 27, 2016 11:00am October 20, 2016

Case 3:15-cv-05934-LB Document 24 Filed 07/19/16 Page 3 of 3