Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05387/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05387-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2004\5387\orderreexparte1.wpd

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VERITY, INC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 04-05387 CRB

ORDER

Verity’s ex parte motion to continue the trial date or in the alternative continue the

deadlines for expert discovery is DENIED without prejudice. Verity may renew its motion if

its motion to compel is granted and it believes in good faith that it can show that it is unable

to comply with the current schedule because of Inxight’s failure to produce discovery that the

court ultimately ordered it to compel. In the meantime, the parties may stipulate to modify

the discovery schedule.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 8, 2005 

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 35 Filed 07/08/05 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2004\5387\orderreexparte1.wpd 2

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 35 Filed 07/08/05 Page 2 of 2