Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00596/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00596-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID W. JACOBSON )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

WARDEN, McFARLAND CCF, et al., )

)

Respondent. )

)

)

___________________________________ )

1:07-cv-0596 AWI WMW HC

ORDER VACATING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE

DISMISSING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

[Doc. 6 ]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

On June 6, 2007, the court entered findings and recommendations in this case in

which it found that although Petitioner seeks to challenge his parole revocation, it appears

from the petition that the only grounds for relief Petitioner has presented to the California

Supreme Court are related to his original conviction. The court found that the claims related

to his parole revocation thus appeared to be unexhausted. Therefore the court recommended

Case 1:07-cv-00596-AWI-WMW Document 11 Filed 12/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

that this petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice.

In his objections filed June 18, 2007, Petitioner explains that he did present his claims

regarding parole revocation to the California Supreme Court, but is unable to provide the

court with documentation of that fact. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1) The findings and recommendations entered June 6, 2007, are VACATED;

2) The court will order Respondent to respond to the petition by separate order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 6, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00596-AWI-WMW Document 11 Filed 12/07/07 Page 2 of 2