Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02947/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02947-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Matthew C. Holohan (SBN 239040)

mholohan@quarles.com

QUARLES & BRADY LLP

8744 Kendrick Castillo Way, Suite 560

Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129

Telephone: (303) 268-0066

Facsimile: (833) 793-0703

Attorney for Defendant

Sacramento Ag Products, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

TESSENDERLO KERLEY, INC., a Delaware 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

SACRAMENTO AG PRODUCTS, LLC, a 

California corporation

Defendant.

Case No.: 2:24-cv-02947-CKD

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL 

COMPLAINT; ORDER 

Complaint Served: October 31, 2024

Current Response Date: December 19, 2024

New Response Date: January 21, 2025

Case 2:24-cv-02947-CKD Document 14 Filed 12/18/24 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff TESSENDERLO KERLEY, INC. (“TKI” or 

“Plaintiff”) and Defendant SACRAMENTO AG PRODUCTS, LLC (“Sac Ag” or “Defendant”)

(together, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as 

follows:

1. The time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint was 

previously extended by stipulation is extended up to and including January 21, 2025.

2. Plaintiff TKI filed its Complaint on October 25, 2024.

3. Defendant Sac Ag was duly served with the Complaint on October 31, 2024.

4. Defendant Sac Ag’s response to the Complaint was initially due on November 21, 

2024.

5. The parties previously stipulated to extend the time for Defendant Sac Ag to respond 

to the Complaint by 28 days to December 19, 2024.

6. The Parties have met and conferred and agree that Defendant Sac Ag may have 

additional time, to and including January 21, 2025, in which to evaluate the case and respond to the 

Complaint.

7. This is the second stipulation for a request for an extension of time to answer or 

otherwise respond to the Complaint submitted by the Parties.

8. This extension of time will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already 

fixed by Court order.

9. This stipulated-to extension of time will not prejudice the Parties.

Now therefore, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the Parties, through their 

undersigned counsel, that Defendant shall have up to and including January 21, 2025 to answer or 

otherwise respond to the Complaint.

Case 2:24-cv-02947-CKD Document 14 Filed 12/18/24 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SO STIPULATED:

Dated: December 16, 2024 By: /s/ Roya Rahmanpour (as authorized on

December 16, 2024)

Jonathan J. Boustani (SBN 274748)

Jonathan.Boustani@btlaw.com

Roya Rahmanpour (SBN 285076)

Roya.Rahmanpour@btlaw.com

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

2029 Century Park East, Suite 300

Los Angeles, California 90067-2904

Telephone: (310) 284-3880

Facsimile: (310) 284-3894

Attorney for Plaintiff

TESSENDERLO KERLEY, INC.

Dated: December 16, 2024 By: /s/ Matthew C. Holohan

Matthew C. Holohan (SBN 239040)

mholohan@quarles.com

QUARLES & BRADY LLP

8744 Kendrick Castillo Way, Suite 560

Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129

Telephone: (303) 268-0066

Facsimile: (833) 793-0703

Attorney for Defendant

SACRAMENTO AG PRODUCTS, LLC

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 18, 2024

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-02947-CKD Document 14 Filed 12/18/24 Page 3 of 3