Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04819/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04819-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF #1431505 v1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S 

COUNTERCLAIMS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EXTREME CCTV, INC., 

a foreign corporation, and 

FORWARD VISION CCTV LIMITED, a 

foreign corporation, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

SAY SECURITY GROUP USA, 

an Ohio limited liability company , 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: CV 07-04819 CW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO REPLY TO 

DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 4:07-cv-04819-CW Document 23 Filed 03/06/08 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF #1431505 v1 - 1 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S 

COUNTERCLAIMS 

Having reviewed the Stipulation for Extension of Time to Reply to Defendant’s 

Counterclaims, given that the parties are engaged in settlement discussions, have exchanged 

settlement proposals, and believe that settlement would be facilitated by an order of court 

extending plaintiffs’ deadline to reply to defendant’s counterclaims, and Good Cause appearing 

therefore:. 

Plaintiffs Extreme CCTV, Inc. and Forward Vision CCTV Limited shall have until March 

24, 2008 to file its reply to defendant Say Security Group USA’s counterclaims. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________ _____________________________________ 

The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

United States District Court Judge 

3/6/08

Case 4:07-cv-04819-CW Document 23 Filed 03/06/08 Page 2 of 2