Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01457/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01457-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Albie B. Jachimowicz (SBN 104549) 

Braid Pezzaglia (SBN 195378) 

JACHIMOWICZ I POINTER 

2007 West Hedding Street, Suite 100 

San Jose, California 95128 

Tel.: (408) 246-5500 

Fax: (408) 246-1051 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Celia Bracamontes and Santiago Martinez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TINA HUYNH 

Plaintiff, 

Vs. 

CELIA BRACAMONTES, individually )) 

and dba PRISCILLA'S SALA DE 

BELLEZA; SANTIAGO A. MARTINEZ l 

Defendants. ) 

____________________ ! 

Case Number: 5:16-cv-01457 HRL 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE LAST DATE 

TO CONDUCT THE JOINT SITE 

INSPECTION REQUIRED UNDER GENERAL 

ORDER 56 AND THE SCHEDULING ORDER; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Judge: Hon. Howard R. Lloyd 

Courtroom: 2, 5th Fl., 280 S. First St., San Jose 

Whereas this action was commenced on March 24, 2016; 

Whereas the Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under 

Americans With Disabilities ActTitle II & III (42 U.S.C. §§12131-89) (Dkt. 4) sets the last date 

for the parties and counsel to hold a joint inspection of the subject premises as July 7, 2016 

(General Order 56 ~3,4); 

Whereas there is a pending motion by defendants to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to 

F.R.C.P. §12(b)(1) and (b)(6) scheduled for hearing on July 12,2016 (Dkt. 16); 

1 

Stipulation and Order (5:16-CV-01457 HRL) 

E-Filed 7/13/16

Case 5:16-cv-01457-HRL Document 20 Filed 07/13/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

00 19 

"' .... "' "'~ " >=l If) .... "' "' z 20 

s r)1 ~ c.. ~ ~ 

~ ~ 21 

l"l Q -

~ ~ ~ 6:tu 22 " . . - ~ [;] ::: t- 0 

Uo"' 23 

:; ~ ~ <J] 

24 

:! 

27 

28 

Whereas the granting of the motion without leave to amend will be dispositive to this action; 

Whereas the parties are making effort to conserve time and expense including attorney fees 

relating to the joint inspection should the motion be granted; 

Whereas the parties desire to extend the last day for the joint inspection to accommodate the 

Court's ruling; 

Whereas there have been no previous extensions of time requested; 

The parties hereby stipulate, by and through counsel, to a 45 day continuance from which to 

hold the joint inspection, up to and including August 22, 2016, and that all other dates in the 

Scheduling Order triggered by the date of the site inspection also be continued accordingly. 

Dated July 6, 2016 By: 

Dated July 6, 2016 By: 

/S/ 

Tanya Moore, Esq. 

MOORE LAW FIRM 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Tina Huynh 

/S/ 

Braid Pezzaglia 

JACHIMOWICZ I POINTER 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CELIA BRACAMONTES et al. 

ORDER 

Good cause showing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 4) issued on 

this action is amended as follows: The last day for the parties and counsel to hold a joint inspection 

of premises shall be August 22, 2016. All other dates triggered by the date of the joint site 

inspection shall be continued accordingly. 

Dated July_, 2016 

Stipulation and Order (5: 16-CV-01457 HRL) 

2 

Hon. Howard R. Lloyd 

Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of 

California, for the United States District Court 

13

Case 5:16-cv-01457-HRL Document 20 Filed 07/13/16 Page 2 of 2