Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01259/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01259-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1259

RIDDICK WALLING, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE STATE ACCIDENT FUND; PETER LEVENTIS; KRISTEN KIMENY, State 

Accident Funds Adjuster; JACKIE WILLIAMS, State Accident Funds 

Adjuster; MARION TRYON FACE, State Accident Funds Adjuster; 

S. LEANNE MCCORMACK, State Accident Funds Adjuster; WILLIAM 

SHIPLEY, State Accident Funds Adjuster; LANCE SIMS, State 

Accident Funds Adjuster; EDWARD TAVEL, State Accident Funds 

Adjuster; JOSEPH EDWARD NOLAND, State Accident Funds Adjuster; 

DANIAL NEMETH, State Accident Funds Adjuster; LOUIS F. PLZAK, 

State Accident Funds Adjuster; JOSEPH P. TOBIN, State Accident 

Funds Adjuster; DAVID BROSMAN, State Accident Funds Adjuster; 

THOMAS BUD DUC, State Accident Funds Adjuster; MICHELLE 

BECKNELL, State Accident Funds Adjuster; AVERY B. WILKERSON, 

JR., State Accident Funds Adjuster; GENE MCCASKILL, State 

Accident Funds Adjuster; DYANA LOWNDES-ROSEN, State Accident 

Funds Adjuster,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(2:15-cv-04448-DCN)

Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 16-1259 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Riddick Walling, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1259 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Riddick Walling, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). 

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the 

Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Walling’s 

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district 

court’s disposition, Walling has forfeited appellate review of the 

court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th 

Cir. 2014) (noting court’s review is limited to issues preserved 

in informal brief); Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 

n.4 (4th Cir. 2004) (deeming abandoned issue not raised in brief). 

We also find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny

all outstanding motions, and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Walling v. The State Accident Fund, 

No. 2:15-cv-04448-DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2016). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 16-1259 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/22/2016 Pg: 3 of 3