Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-07160/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-07160-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 

---

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., 

LTD., a Taiwan R.O.C. corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ASETEK DANMARK A/S,

Defendant.

Case No.: 3:16-CV-07160-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO 

DISCLOSE INVALIDITY 

CONTENTIONS AND SUBSEQUENT 

DUE DATES

Declaratory Judgment Plaintiff ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD. 

(“AVC”) recently substituted in new counsel for AVC in this action (see Dkt. No. 

67 filed March 18, 2017). AVC recently asked Defendant ASETEK DANMARK 

A/S (“Asetek”) to agree that AVC may have additional time to prepare and serve its 

Invalidity Contentions and Document Productions Accompanying Same

Hubert H. Kuo (SBN 204036) William L. Buus (SBN 180059)

ARDENT LAW GROUP, PC SCHIFFER & BUUS, APC

2301 Dupont Dr., Ste. 510 3070 Bristol St., Ste. 530

Irvine, CA 92612 Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Tel: (949) 863-9782 Tel: (949) 825-6140

Fax: (949) 863-9783 Fax: (949) 825-6141

Email: hkuo@ardentlawgroup.com Email: wbuus@lexopusfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD.

Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056) Arpita Bhattacharyya (pro hac vice)

Robert.McCauley@Finnegan.com arpita.bhattacharyya@finnegan.com

Jacob A. Schroeder (SBN 264717) FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

Jacob.Schroeder@finnegan.com GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, Two Seaport Ln., 6th Fl.

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Boston, MA 02210-2001

3300 Hillview Ave. Tel: (617) 646-1600

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203 Fax: (617) 646-1666

Tel: (650) 849-6600 

Fax: (650) 849-6666

Attorneys for Defendant ASETEK DANMARK A/S

Case 3:16-cv-07160-JST Document 70 Filed 06/12/17 Page 1 of 5
-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(collectively “Invalidity Contentions”). With the Court’s permission, and noting 

that this stipulation (if granted) will not affect the Court’s previously scheduled 

dates for the tutorial and claim construction hearings in this action, AVC and 

Asetek hereby stipulate and request an order extending the due date for the 

Invalidity Contentions by 30 days, as well as subsequent disclosures and events as

provided in the following table:

Event Original 

Deadline New Deadline

Invalidity Contentions May 30, 2017 June 30, 2017

Exchange of Proposed Terms for 

Construction

June 13, 2017 August 4, 2017

Exchange of Preliminary Claim 

Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence

August 4, 2017 August 18, 2017

Deadline to file Joint Claim Construction 

and Prehearing Statement

August 15, 2017 August 25, 2017

Damages Contentions July 19, 2017 September 1, 

2017

Claim Construction Discovery Cutoff September 14, 

2017

Same as 

Original 

Deadline

Deadline to file Opening Claim Construction 

Brief 

September 29, 

2017

Same as 

Original 

Deadline

Responsive Damages Contentions August 18, 2017 September 29, 

2017

Deadline to file Responsive Claim 

Construction Brief (Local Rule - 14 Days 

after Opening Brief)

October 13, 

2017

Same as 

Original 

Deadline

Deadline to file Reply in Support of 

Opening Claim Construction Brief (Local

Rule - 7 days after Responsive Brief)

October 20, 

2017

Same as 

Original 

Deadline

Case 3:16-cv-07160-JST Document 70 Filed 06/12/17 Page 2 of 5
-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Claim Construction Hearing November 7, 

2017 - 1:30 pm

Same as 

Original 

Deadline

The requested extension of time will provide AVC and its new counsel 

additional time to prepare and complete the Invalidity Contentions. Moreover, at 

the request of Asetek, the schedule proposed above avoids having the Exchange of 

Proposed Terms for Construction and other work during July, when a counsel for 

Asetek will be preparing for the California Bar Exam. There have been no previous 

time modifications in this case. 

Respectfully submitted,

ARDENT LAW GROUP, PC

Dated: May 24, 2017 By: /s/ Hubert H. Kuo

Hubert H. Kuo 

Attorneys for Plaintiff ASIA VITAL 

COMPONENTS CO., LTD.

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

Dated: May 24, 2017 By: /s/ Robert F. McCauley

Robert F. McCauley

Attorneys for Attorneys for Defendant 

ASETEK DANMARK A/S

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 3:16-cv-07160-JST Document 70 Filed 06/12/17 Page 3 of 5
-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION IS 

GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

Hon. Jon S. Tigar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

June 12, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-07160-JST Document 70 Filed 06/12/17 Page 4 of 5
-5-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SIGNATURE APPROVAL

I, Hubert H. Kuo, attest that the above listed signatories on whose behalf this 

document is being filed, have concurred in the filing’s content and have authorized 

the filing. 

/s/ Hubert H. Kuo

Hubert H. Kuo

Case 3:16-cv-07160-JST Document 70 Filed 06/12/17 Page 5 of 5