Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07782/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07782-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:203 Equal Pay Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERTO MALDANADO, et al.,

Plaintiffs

 v.

HALLMARK ROOFING, INC., et al.,

Defendants /

No. C 06-7782 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On February 6, 2007, plaintiffs electronically filed their “Amended Complaint for

Damages and Demand for Jury Trial.” Plaintiffs have violated General Order 45 and the

Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than

noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one

paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and

. . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not

File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to

The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Plaintiffs are hereby advised that if they fails in the future to comply with the

Court’s Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Case 3:06-cv-07782-MMC Document 5 Filed 02/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 20, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-07782-MMC Document 5 Filed 02/20/07 Page 2 of 2