Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03111/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03111-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

 

JOHN A. RUSSO, City Attorney - State Bar #129729

RANDOLPH W. HALL, Chief Assistant City Attorney - State Bar #080142 

JAMES F. HODGKINS, Supervising Trial Attorney - State Bar #142561 

CHARLES E. VOSE, Senior Deputy City Attorney - State Bar #139700

One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 238-6621 Fax: (510) 238-6500 

24423/362712 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF OAKLAND, RICHARD WORD, 

GREG LOUD, SEAN BOWLING, 

FRANK BONIFACIO, LARRY MILLIKEN, 

and CRAIG HARDISON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MILTON McMATH, individually and 

DEDRICK SHAVERS, individually 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITY OF OAKLAND, ET AL., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C-05-03111-EDL 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production 

of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be 

warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the 

following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 1 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 2 - C-0503111EDL 

confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 

protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled under 

the applicable legal principles to treatment as confidential. The parties further 

acknowledge, as set forth in Section 10, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order 

creates no entitlement to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets 

forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied 

when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 

II. DEFINITIONS 

A. Party: Any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 

employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff). 

B. Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, 

regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among 

other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in 

disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 

C. “Confidential” Information or Items: Information (regardless of 

how generated stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under 

standards developed under F.R.Civ.P.26(c). 

D. “Highly Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or 

Items: Extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” whose disclosure to 

another Party or non-party would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not 

be avoided by less restrictive means. 

E. Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 

Material from a Producing Party. 

F. Producing Party: A Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or 

Discovery Material in this action. 

G. Designating Party: A Party or non-party that designates information 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 2 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 3 - C-0503111EDL 

or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

H. Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 

designated as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

I. Outside Counsel: Attorneys who are not employees of a Party but 

who are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 

J. House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a Party. 

K. Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel 

(as well as their support staffs). 

L. Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a 

matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve 

as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action and who is not a past or current 

employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party’s and who, at the time of retention, is not 

anticipated to become an employee of a Party or a competitor of a Party’s. This definition 

includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained in connection with this litigation. 

M. Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation 

support services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or 

demonstrations; organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their 

employees and subcontractors. 

III. SCOPE 

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 

Protected Material (as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted 

therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus 

testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or counsel to or in court or in other 

settings that might reveal Protected Material. 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 3 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 4 - C-0503111EDL 

IV. DURATION 

Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 

imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in 

writing or a court order otherwise directs. 

V. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 

A. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for 

Protection. Each Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection 

under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 

qualifies under the appropriate standards. A Designated Party must take care to 

designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written 

communications that qualify — so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or 

communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the 

ambit of this Order.

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations 

that are shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose 

(e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose 

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties), expose the Designating Party to 

sanctions. 

If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items 

that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the 

level of protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other 

parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 

B. Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided 

in this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise 

stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly 

so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 4 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 5 - C-0503111EDL 

Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 

1. For information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of 

depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” at the top 

of each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material 

on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 

protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must 

specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). 

A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials 

available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting 

Party has indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the 

inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection 

shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the 

inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the 

Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for 

protection under this Order, then, before producing the specified documents, the 

Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) at the top of each page that contains 

Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 

protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 

making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level 

of protection being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). 

C. Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an 

inadvertent failure to designated qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 5 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 6 - C-0503111EDL 

Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating 

Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. If material is 

appropriately designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” 

after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the 

designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in 

accordance with the provisions of this Order. 

VI. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 

A. Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating 

Party’s confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial 

unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the 

litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by 

electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed.

B. Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a 

Designating Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the 

process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication 

are not sufficient) with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging 

Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not 

proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated 

material, to reconsider the circumstances, and if no change in designation is offered, to 

explain the basis for the chosen designation. A challenging Party may proceed to the next 

stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first. 

C. Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a 

confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating 

Party may file and serve a motion under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil 

Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail 

the basis for the challenge. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 6 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 7 - C-0503111EDL 

declaration that affirms that the movant has complied with the meet and confer 

requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that sets for the with specificity the 

justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating Party in 

the meet and confer dialogue.

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the 

Designating Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to 

afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the 

Producing Party’s designation. 

VII. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

A. Basic Principles. . A Receiving Party may use Protected Material 

that is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this 

case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected 

Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions 

described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must 

comply with the provisions of section 11, below (FINAL DISPOSITION).

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 

location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 

authorized under this Order. 

B. Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 

otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 

Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to: 

1. The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, 

as well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the 

information for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

2. The officers, directors, and employees (including House 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 7 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 8 - C-0503111EDL 

Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this 

litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit 

A); 

3. Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to 

whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 

“Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

4. The Court and its personnel; 

5. Court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement 

to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

6. During their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to 

depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter 

and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective 

Order. 

7. The author of the document or the original source of the 

information. 

C. Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in 

writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item 

designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 

1. The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, 

as well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the 

information for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 8 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 9 - C-0503111EDL 

2. Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Agreement to be Bound 

by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

3. The Court and its personnel; 

4. court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement 

to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and 

5. the author of the document or the original source of the 

information. 

D. Procedures for Approving Disclosure of “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items to “Experts”

1. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed in writing by 

the Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an “Expert” (as defined in this 

Order) any information or item that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” first must make a written request to the Designating Party 

that (1) identifies the specific HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL information that the Receiving 

Party seeks permission to disclose to the Expert, (2) sets forth the full name of the Expert 

and the city and state of his or her primary residence, (3) attaches a copy of the Expert’s 

current resume, (4) identifies the Expert’s current employer(s), (5) identifies each person 

or entity from whom the Expert has received compensation for work in his or her areas of 

expertise or to whom the expert has provided professional services at any time during the 

preceding five years, and (6) identifies (by name and number of the case, filing date, and 

location of court) any litigation in connection with which the Expert has provided any 

professional services during the preceding five years. 

/// 

2. A Party that makes a request and provides the information 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 9 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 10 - C-0503111EDL 

specified in the preceding paragraph may disclose the subject Protected Material to the 

identified Expert unless, within seven court days of delivering the request, the Party 

receives a written objection from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth 

in detail the grounds on which it is based. 

3. A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and 

confer with the Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve 

the matter by agreement. If no agreement is reached, the Party is seeking to make the 

disclosure to the Expert may file a motion as provided in Civil Local Rule 7 (and in 

compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) seeking permission from the court to 

do so. Any such motion must describe the circumstances with specificity, set forth in 

detail the reasons for which the disclosure to the Expert is reasonably necessary, assess 

the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail and suggest any additional means that 

might be used to reduce that risk. In addition, any such motion must accompanied by a 

competent declaration in which the movant describes the parties’ efforts to resolve the 

matter by agreement (i.e., the extent and the content of the meet and confer discussions) 

and sets forth the reasons advanced by the Designating Party for its refusal to approve the 

disclosure. 

In any such proceeding the Party opposing disclosure to the Expert 

shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail 

(under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the 

Protected Material to its Expert. 

VIII. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN 

OTHER LITIGATION. 

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other 

litigation that would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action 

as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 10 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 11 - C-0503111EDL 

Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) 

immediately and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or 

order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order. 

The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who 

caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material 

covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the 

Receiving Party must deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the 

Party in the other action that caused the subpoena or order to issue. 

The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the 

existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an 

opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the 

subpoena or order issued. The Designated Party shall bear the burdens and expenses of 

seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions 

should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to 

disobey a lawful directive from another court. 

IX. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has 

disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under 

this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing 

the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all 

copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized 

disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or 

persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached 

hereto as Exhibit A. 

/// 

X. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 11 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 12 - C-0503111EDL 

Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order 

secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public 

record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 

Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. 

XI. FINAL DISPOSITION 

Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within 

sixty days after the final termination of this action, each Receiving Party must return all 

Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected 

Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of 

reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. With permission in writing from the 

Designating Party, the Receiving Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material 

instead of returning it. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the 

Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the 

same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty day deadline that identifies 

(by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed 

and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, 

compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected 

Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of 

all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney 

work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies 

that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set 

forth in Section 4 (DURATION), above. 

XII. MISCELLANEOUS 

A. Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of 

any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 

B. Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 12 of 13
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 13 - C-0503111EDL 

Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing 

or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated 

Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in 

evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 9, 2006 

 ________/s/___________________________ 

 BENJAMIN NIESENBAUM, ESQ. 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 

Dated: March 9, 2006 

 __________/s/_________________________ 

 CHARLES E. VOSE 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________ 

 ___________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

March 10, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

Case 3:05-cv-03111-EDL Document 25 Filed 03/10/06 Page 13 of 13