Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06800/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06800-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN K. TOSCANO,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAUREEN MCLEAN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-06800-EMC 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 

REINSTATE DEFENDANTS

Docket No. 26

On February 6, 2018, the Court reviewed the second amended complaint, ordered service 

of process on two Defendants and dismissed the other Defendants for the reasons stated in that 

order. Docket No. 24. Plaintiff has filed a motion for reinstatement of three dismissed Defendants 

because he disagrees with the Court’s analysis in the February 6, 2018. Plaintiff fails to show 

newly discovered evidence, clear error, a manifestly unjust decision, or an intervening change in 

the law. See School Dist. No. 1J v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993) 

(“Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered 

evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is 

an intervening change in controlling law.”) Plaintiff’s motion seeking reconsideration of the 

February 6, 2018 order therefore is DENIED. Docket No. 26. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2018

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-06800-EMC Document 28 Filed 03/19/18 Page 1 of 1