Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01778/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01778-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES FLOYD,

Petitioner,

v.

ROBERT W. FOX, Warden,

Respondent.

No. 2:16-cv-1778 KJN P

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Both parties consented to proceed before the undersigned 

for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On December 30, 2016, respondent filed a motion to 

dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: 

“Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition 

may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Id. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within 

thirty days, why his failure to oppose respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14) should not be

deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition. 

Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, and to file an opposition to the 

////

////

Case 2:16-cv-01778-KJN Document 17 Filed 02/10/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

pending motion to dismiss, will result in an order granting the motion, and dismissing the 

unexhausted claims. 

Dated: February 10, 2017

/floy1778.46hab

Case 2:16-cv-01778-KJN Document 17 Filed 02/10/17 Page 2 of 2