Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01333/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01333-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED ORDER RE: MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT TO 

INCLUDE PREJUDGMENT INTEREST PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 59(e)

1

John P. Costello, Esq. (California State Bar No. 161511) 

Pamela W. Bertani, Esq. (California State Bar No. 182672) 

COSTELLO LAW CORPORATION 

331 J Street, Suite 200 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone No.: (916) 441-2234 

Fax No: (916) 441-4254 

Glenn W. Peterson, Esq. (California State Bar No. 126173) 

MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP 

2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210 

Roseville, CA 95661 

Telephone: (916) 780-8222 

Fax No: (916) 780-8775 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

Dustin K. Adler 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DUST WBS-PAN (JFM) IN K. ADLER, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

RELYNET, INC., a California Corporation, 

MICHAEL DICARLO, an individual, 

INTERNET BRAND, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, INTERMEDIA OUTDOORS, 

INC., a Delaware corporation, VORTEX 

MEDIA GROUP, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, 

inclusively, 

 Defendants. 

_______________________________________

RELYNET, INC., a California Corporation, 

MICHAEL DICARLO, an individual, and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusively, 

 Counterclaimants, 

vs. 

DUSTIN K. ADLER, an individual, 

 Counterdefendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

Case No. 2:08-CV-01333-JAM-EFB 

ORDER RE: MOTION TO AMEND 

JUDGMENT 

TO INCLUDE PREJUDGMENT 

INTEREST PURSUANT TO FRCP 

RULE 59(e) 

__

Date: April 7, 2010 

Time: 9:30 a.m. 

Courtroom: 6 

Honorable John A. Mendez 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:08-cv-01333-JAM-EFB Document 294 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED ORDER RE: MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT TO 

INCLUDE PREJUDGMENT INTEREST PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 59(e)

-1-

Plaintiff's motion to amend the judgment under FRCP Rule 59(e) came on for hearing on 

April 7, 2010 on this Court's 9:30 calendar. The Court has considered the evidence admitted at trial, 

and the jury verdict rendered. It has also considered the underlying briefs and oral argument of 

counsel. The Court finds that Plaintiff has demonstrated that an award of prejudgment interest is 

appropriate in this case, and now rules as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to amend judgment to include 

prejudgment interest is GRANTED. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment entered herein on February 8, 

2010 ("Judgment") in the amount of $1,110,699.00 is ordered amended to include an award of 

prejudgment interest in the amount of $90,299. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment entered on February 8, 2010 is 

hereby amended so that the total amount now due to Plaintiff from Defendants Michael DiCarlo and 

RelyNet, Inc. is $1,200,998.00. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. 

Dated: April 8, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________

 JOHN A. MENDEZ 

 Judge of the United States District Court 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:08-cv-01333-JAM-EFB Document 294 Filed 04/09/10 Page 2 of 2