Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02591/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02591-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26:7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES O. MOLEN, et al.

Defendants.

No. 2:10-cv-02591-MCE-KJN

ORDER

In an Order dated June 23, 2015, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 229) and granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Default 

Judgment (ECF No. 200). ECF No. 235. Shortly thereafter, Defendant John Hugh Van 

Auken filed Additional Objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 236), 

and Defendant James O. Molen filed three documents: “Reply to United States’ Reply to 

Defendant’s Objections” (ECF No. 237) and two “Affidavit[s] of Truth in Support of 

Objection to Order” (ECF Nos. 238, 239). The Court has reviewed each of these 

documents and finds that they do not affect the Magistrate Judge’s analysis or the

Court’s Order dated June 23, 2015 (ECF No. 235). That Order shall remain in effect.

///

///

///

Case 2:10-cv-02591-MCE-KJN Document 240 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Additionally, the Court has reviewed Defendant James O. Molen’s Motion to 

Correct the Record (ECF No. 230). Because that Motion is without merit, it is hereby 

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 18, 2015

 

Case 2:10-cv-02591-MCE-KJN Document 240 Filed 09/21/15 Page 2 of 2