Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00560/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00560-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Plaintiff also alleges tort claims under California law. 

2

 In a Findings and Recommendations issued concurrently with this order, the Court recommended that

Plaintiff’s ADA and RA claims be dismissed from this action for failure to state any claims upon which relief may be

granted. 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACK ALLEN WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-00560-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

APPROPRIATE AND FORWARDING

SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR

COMPLETION AND RETURN

(Doc. 1)

Plaintiff Jack Allen Wilson (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 Plaintiff filed this action on

April 26, 2005. The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and

finds that it states cognizable claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Woodford,

Doe 1, Corcoran, Wu, Kyle, Divine, Brooks, Suryadevara, and Martinez for acting with deliberate

indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment.2 Fed. R.

Civ. P. 8(a); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 512-15 (2002); Austin v. Terhune, 367

F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2004); Jackson v. Carey, 353 F.3d 750, 754 (9th Cir. 2003); Galbraith v.

County of Santa Clara, 307 F.3d 1119, 1125-26 (9th Cir. 2002). 

///

Case 1:05-cv-00560-OWW -SMS Document 12 Filed 03/24/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

 The Marshal cannot initiate service on a Doe defendant. Once Plaintiff identifies Doe I, he shall notify the

Court.

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:3

JEANNE WOODFORD

LANCE CORCORAN

DR. SHU PIN WU

DR. DAVID KYLE

M. DIVINE

BROOKS

DR. S. SURYADEVARA

G. MARTINEZ 

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff eight (8) USM-285 forms, eight (8)

summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the complaint filed April 26, 2005.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Nine (9) copies of the endorsed complaint filed April 26, 2005. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the Court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

///

///

///

Case 1:05-cv-00560-OWW -SMS Document 12 Filed 03/24/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 23, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00560-OWW -SMS Document 12 Filed 03/24/06 Page 3 of 3