Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01758/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01758-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARLON MONTOYA, on behalf of

herself and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 FMS INVESTMET CORP.,

Defendant. /

No. C 15-01758 WHA

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

APPEAR BY TELEPHONE

Defense counsel have submitted a motion to appear by telephone at tomorrow’s case

management conference. Counsel state that they did not think they had to appear because the

parties provided notice that they have reached a settlement and defense counsel live in San

Diego. Good cause not shown, the motion is DENIED. Counsel must appear in person.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 18, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-01758-WHA Document 38 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 1