Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00182/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00182-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD B. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

1:11-cv-0182-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 20)

Plaintiff Donald B. Williams (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 29, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation,

recommending dismissal of certain of Plaintiff’s claims and defendants. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff

has failed to file objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

analysis.

///

///

///

///

///

Case 1:11-cv-00182-LJO-MJS Document 25 Filed 10/13/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed August 29, 2011, is adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s claims against the California Department of Corrections are dismissed

without prejudice;

3. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Allison are dismissed without prejudiced

4. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Rodriguez, Beltran, Stolh, Lofkin, and

Childress are dismissed without prejudice;

5. Plaintiff’s claims against Correction Management Corp. Inc. are dismissed without

prejudice; 

6. Plaintiff’s medical care claim against Defendants Enenmoh and Oneyeje related to

the October 12, 2010 incident is dismissed without prejudice;

7. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Betancourt are dismissed without prejudice;

and

8. Defendants California Department of Corrections, Allison, Rodriguez, Beltran,

Stohl, Lofkin, Childress, Correction Management Corp. Inc., and Betancourt are

dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

Case 1:11-cv-00182-LJO-MJS Document 25 Filed 10/13/11 Page 2 of 2