Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01996/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01996-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN R. TOWNZEN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1996 DFL DAD P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

A recent court order served on plaintiff at his address of record was returned by

the postal service as undeliverable. It appears that plaintiff is no longer in custody and has failed

to comply with Local Rule 83-182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona

inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

plaintiff’s failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f)

and 11-110.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections

Case 2:06-cv-01996-RRB-DAD Document 12 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal

the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 27, 2006.

DAD:13:mp

town1996.33a

Case 2:06-cv-01996-RRB-DAD Document 12 Filed 11/27/06 Page 2 of 2