Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02786/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02786-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFT. CANOVA TO 

RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-02042-CRB

NORMAN J. BLEARS (Bar No. 95600)

Norman.Blears@hellerehrman.com

ALEXANDER M. R. LYON (Bar No. 211274)

Alexander.Lyon@hellerehrman.com

HELLER EHRMAN LLP

275 Middlefield Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025-3506

Telephone: +1.650.324.7000

Facsimile: +1.650.324.0638

Attorneys for Defendant

ANTONIO CANOVA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ANDREW E. ROTH, derivatively on behalf of 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

GREGORY REYES, MICHAEL BYRD, 

ANTONIO CANOVA, JACK CUTHBERT, and 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC.,

Defendants.

Case No.: C-06-2786

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT ANTONIO CANOVA 

TO RESPOND TO THE AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

 The Honorable Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 26 Filed 07/21/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFT. CANOVA TO 

RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-02042-CRB

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, the complaint in this action was filed on April 24, 2006;

WHEREAS, defendant Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (“Brocade”) filed a 

motion to dismiss the complaint on June 8, 2006;

WHEREAS, plaintiff decided to amend the complaint in lieu of opposing the motion 

to dismiss;

WHEREAS, plaintiff and defendant Brocade stipulated that the amended complaint 

would be filed by July 14, 2006, with defendant Brocade’s response thereto due on August 

14, 2006;

WHEREAS, plaintiff and defendant Jack Cuthbert stipulated that Mr. Cuthbert’s 

response to the amended complaint would be filed and served by August 28, 2006.

WHEREAS, the Court has approved the foregoing stipulations between plaintiff and 

defendants Brocade and Mr. Cuthbert;

WHEREAS, plaintiff filed his first amended complaint on July 14, 2006; and

WHEREAS, defendant Antonio Canova has requested to respond to the amended 

complaint by August 28, 2006, and plaintiff has agreed;

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED as follows:

Defendant Antonio Canova’s response to the amended complaint shall be filed and 

served by August 28, 2006.

SO STIPULATED:

DATED: July 19, 2006 HELLER EHRMAN LLP

By /s/ Alexander Lyon

ALEXANDER M.R. LYON

Attorneys for Defendant Antonio Canova

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 26 Filed 07/21/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFT. CANOVA TO 

RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-02042-CRB

DATED: July 19, 2006 SCHUBERT & REED LLP

BRAGAR WEXLER & EAGEL, P.C.

OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY 

& BROITMAN P.C.

By /s/Alexander Lyon with permission for

WILLEM F. JONCKHEER

Attorneys for Plaintiff Andrew E. Roth

* * *

ORDER

Good cause appearing, it is so ordered:

DATED: ______________ ______________________________________

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Court Judge

July 20, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 26 Filed 07/21/06 Page 3 of 3