Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00583/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00583-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. LEWIS et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:17-cv-00583-MCE-AC

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are two motions filed by Plaintiff: (1) 

Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 50) of the Magistrate Judge’s October 21, 2019, 

order denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 48); and (2) Motion to Vacate, Set 

Aside, or Correct (ECF No. 60) the Magistrate Judge’s January 15, 2019, order granting 

Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 36).

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge’s 

order shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the 

entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge’s rulings were 

clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 50) is DENIED;

Case 2:17-cv-00583-DC-AC Document 61 Filed 04/06/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Order (ECF No. 60) is 

DENIED;

3. The Magistrate Judge’s October 21, 2019, and January 15, 2019, orders are 

AFFIRMED; and

4. No further motions for reconsideration of or motions to vacate these orders will 

be considered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 3, 2020

Case 2:17-cv-00583-DC-AC Document 61 Filed 04/06/20 Page 2 of 2