Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01446/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01446-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Abel Valencia is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On April 23, 2014, the Court found service of the complaint appropriate and forwarded 

Plaintiff the necessary service of process documents.

On May 19, 2014, Plaintiff submitted the complete service of process documents, along with a 

motion for clarification of the Court’s April 23, 2014, order. In the motion, Plaintiff indicates he is 

unclear as to how many copies of the relevant CDCR 602 inmate appeal grievances is required for 

service of process.

///

///

///

///

ABEL VALENCIA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CONNIE GIPSON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-01446-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION 

[ECF No. 25]

Case 1:12-cv-01446-AWI-SAB Document 31 Filed 07/30/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

However, at this time all defendants have been served. Therefore, Plaintiff’s pending motion 

for clarification is DENIED as MOOT. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 2014 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01446-AWI-SAB Document 31 Filed 07/30/14 Page 2 of 2