Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-05252/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-05252-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEVILLE PORRAS,

Petitioner,

 v.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. /

No. C 08-05252 CW (PR)

ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit, Hayward v.

Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. Apr. 22, 2010)

(en banc), addressed important issues relating to federal habeas

review of Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) decisions denying parole

to California state prisoners. Therefore, the Court will provide

each party an opportunity to submit a supplemental brief (not to

exceed ten (10) pages in length) explaining his views of how the

Hayward en banc decision applies to the facts presented in

Petitioner's challenge to BPH's decision denying him parole.

The Court sets the following schedule:

1. No later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order,

Respondent must send to Petitioner a copy of the Hayward en banc

decision. 

Case 4:08-cv-05252-CW Document 11 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. No later than thirty (30) days from the date of this

Order, Respondent must file and serve any supplemental brief

applying Hayward to the facts presented in Petitioner's case.

3. No later than thirty (30) days after the date

Respondent's supplemental brief is filed, Petitioner must file and

serve any supplemental brief applying Hayward to the facts

presented in his case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 5/21/2010 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:08-cv-05252-CW Document 11 Filed 05/21/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEVILLE PORRAS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

BEN CURRY et al,

Defendant. /

Case Number: CV08-05252 CW 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District

Court, Northern District of California.

That on May 21, 2010, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said

copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said

envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located

in the Clerk's office.

Neville Porras E-37606

P.O. Box 689

YW-337

Soledad, CA 93960-0689

Dated: May 21, 2010

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk

Case 4:08-cv-05252-CW Document 11 Filed 05/21/10 Page 3 of 3