Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00701/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00701-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, CASE NO. C-06-00701-MMC

Anna S. McLean (No. 142233) 

Nathaniel Spencer-Mork (No. 226886) 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP

333 Bush Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104-2878 

Telephone: (415) 772-6666 

Facsimile: (415) 772-6268 

Anna.McLean@hellerehrman.com

Nate.SpencerMork@hellerehrman.com 

John C. Ulin (No. 165524) 

Patricia K. Oliver (No. 193423) 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP

333 South Hope Street, 39th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 689-0200 

Facsimile: (213) 614-1868 

John.Ulin@hellerehrman.com

Patricia.Oliver@hellerehrman.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., 

Plaintiff,

 v. 

SILVER VIEW SUPERMARKET, a California 

corporation doing business as SILVER VIEW 

SUPERMARKET, et al.,

Defendants.

 NO.: C-06-00701-MMC 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

Hearing Date: February 17, 2006 

Hearing Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 7 

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MMC Document 35 Filed 02/17/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, CASE NO. C-06-00701-MMC

This matter came on for hearing before the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney, United 

States District Judge, in Courtroom 7 of the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of California located at 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, CA on February 17, 

2006 at 9:00 a.m. on an Order to Show Cause why an order should not be entered, pursuant 

to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, granting plaintiff Philip Morris USA 

Inc. (“Philip Morris USA”) the preliminary injunctive relief set forth below against Silver 

View Supermarket, a California corporation doing business as Silver View Supermarket 

(“Silver View Supermarket”), pending the final disposition of this action. To date, no 

opposition has been filed by Silver View Supermarket. 

The Court, having considered the papers filed by Philip Morris USA, hereby finds 

that good cause has been shown for the issuance of the requested preliminary injunction as 

follows:

IT IS ORDERED THAT, pending the final disposition of this action, Defendant 

Silver View Supermarket is hereby enjoined and prohibited from: 

1. Purchasing, selling, offering for sale, or otherwise using in commerce any 

counterfeit MARLBORO® and/or MARLBORO LIGHTS® brand cigarettes; and 

2. Assisting, aiding or abetting any other person or entity in purchasing, selling, 

offering for sale, or otherwise using in commerce any counterfeit MARLBORO® and/or 

MARLBORO LIGHTS® brand cigarettes. 

ORDER GRANTING CERTAIN EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, Philip Morris USA shall be entitled to conduct the following 

expedited discovery from Defendant as follows: 

1. Philip Morris USA shall be entitled to serve discovery immediately upon 

Defendant -- i.e. before the parties have conferred pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 26(f) or made their initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a) -- including but not 

limited to discovery by way of interrogatories, requests for production, depositions, requests 

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MMC Document 35 Filed 02/17/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, CASE NO. C-06-00701-MMC

for admissions, and third-party discovery. 

BOND

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the bond in the amount of $10,000 that was 

posted with the Clerk of this Court by Philip Morris USA on February 10, 2006, to provide 

security for the payment of such costs and damages as may be incurred or suffered by any 

party who is found to have been wrongfully restrained or enjoined by the Temporary 

Restraining Order issued by the Court on February 7, 2006, is hereby converted into a bond 

to provide security for any such costs or damages as may be incurred by any party who is 

found to have been wrongfully enjoined by this Preliminary Injunction. 

UNSEALING

 Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d)(8), the Court previously ordered that the temporary 

restraining order and all supporting documents filed by plaintiff (Docket Nos. 4-11, and 13-

21) would be filed under seal until defendant had an opportunity to contest the temporary 

restraining order. As defendant has been afforded such opportunity, there is no need for 

said documents to remain under seal.

Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT all documents previously filed 

under seal in the instant action shall be unsealed.

SERVICE

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on 

Silver View Supermarket forthwith. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 17, 2006 _________________________________________

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MMC Document 35 Filed 02/17/06 Page 3 of 3