Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-80/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PENDING BRIEFING AND MOTION HEARINGS 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099 

 tboutrous@gibsondunn.com 

THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 

 tevangelis@gibsondunn.com 

DHANANJAY MANTHRIPRAGADA, 

SBN 254433 

 dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 

Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 

 jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com 

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 

Telephone: 415.393.8200 

Facsimile: 415.393.8306 

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289 

kringdowell@gibsondunn.com 

3161 Michelson Drive 

Irvine, CA 92612-4412 

Telephone: 949.451.3800 

Facsimile: 949.475.4220 

Attorneys for Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, 

INC. and TRAVIS KALANICK 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, SBN 310719

 sliss@llrlaw.com 

ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice 

 apagano@llrlaw.com 

729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 

Boston, MA 02116 

Telephone: 617.994.5800 

Facsimile: 617.994.5801 

MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242 

 mcarlson@llrlaw.com 

466 Geary Street, Suite 201 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

 Telephone: 415.630.2651 

Facsimile: 617.994.5801 

Attorneys for O’Connor Plaintiffs 

THOMAS COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, 

and ELIE GURFINKEL, and for Yucesoy

Plaintiffs HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI 

MAHAMMED, MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN 

MORRIS, and PEDRO SANCHEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 13-cv-03826-EMC 

CASE NO. 15-cv-00262-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO STAY PENDING BRIEFING 

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. 

Defendants. 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 761 Filed 11/09/16 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PENDING BRIEFING AND MOTION HEARINGS 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

STIPULATION TO STAY BRIEFING AND HEARING DATES 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, O’Connor Plaintiffs Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, 

and Elie Gurfinkel (collectively, the “O’Connor Plaintiffs”), Yucesoy Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy, Abdi 

Mahammed, Mokhtar Talha, Brian Morris, and Pedro Sanchez (collectively, the “Yucesoy Plaintiffs”) 

(together with the O’Connor Plaintiffs, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. 

(“Uber”) and Travis Kalanick (together, the “Defendants”) (together with the Plaintiffs, the 

“Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, the Court scheduled a further case management conference (“CMC”) in both 

O’Connor v. Uber Techs., Inc., 13-cv-03826-EMC (“O’Connor”) and Yucesoy v. Uber Techs., Inc., 

15-cv-00262-EMC (“Yucesoy”) for November 18, 2016, at 10:30 a.m., see O’Connor Dkt. 755, 

Yucesoy Dkt. 245; 

WHEREAS, on April 6, 2016, O’Connor Defendant Uber filed an Expedited Motion to Stay 

Pending Appeal, O’Connor Dkt. 506, which this Court has not yet adjudicated but which the Parties 

plan to discuss with the Court at the November 18 CMC; 

WHEREAS, on November 3, 2016, O’Connor Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Expand Class 

Period, O’Connor Dkt. 757, setting a response deadline of November 17, 2016, and a motion hearing 

for December 15, 2016; 

WHEREAS, on November 4, 2016, Yucesoy Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Class Certification, 

Yucesoy Dkt. 246, setting a response deadline of November 18, 2016, and a motion hearing for 

December 15, 2016; 

WHEREAS, on November 7, 2016, O’Connor Defendant Uber filed a renewed Motion to 

Stay Pending Appeal, O’Connor Dkt. 758, updating its arguments, setting a response deadline of 

November 21, 2016, and a motion hearing for December 15, 2016; 

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that it would be most efficient and would conserve the time and 

resources of the parties and the Court to discuss all pending motions at the November 18 CMC, 

before further briefing takes place with respect to any of these motions; 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that: 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 761 Filed 11/09/16 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PENDING BRIEFING AND MOTION HEARINGS 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

1. All briefing deadlines related to O’Connor Plaintiffs’ Motion to Expand Class Period, 

O’Connor Dkt. 757, are hereby STAYED pending the upcoming CMC. 

2. All briefing deadlines related to Yucesoy Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, 

Yucesoy Dkt. 246, are hereby STAYED pending the upcoming CMC. 

3. All briefing deadlines related to Uber’s Motion to Stay Pending Appeal, O’Connor

Dkt. 758, are hereby STAYED pending the upcoming CMC. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Dated: November 8, 2016 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By: /s/ Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. 

 Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. 

Attorneys for Defendants UBER 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and TRAVIS 

KALANICK 

Dated: November 8, 2016 LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

By: /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan 

Shannon Liss-Riordan 

Attorney for Plaintiffs THOMAS COLOPY, 

MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE GURFINKEL 

Attorneys for Yucesoy Plaintiffs HAKAN YUCESOY, 

ABDI MAHAMMED, MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN 

MORRIS, and PEDRO SANCHEZ 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 761 Filed 11/09/16 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PENDING BRIEFING AND MOTION HEARINGS 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________, 2016 _________________________ 

The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

United States District Judge 

 

11/9

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 761 Filed 11/09/16 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PENDING BRIEFING AND MOTION HEARINGS 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

ECF ATTESTATION 

I, Kevin J. Ring-Dowell, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. and Shannon Liss-Riordan. 

By: /s/ Kevin J. Ring-Dowell 

 Kevin J. Ring-Dowell 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 761 Filed 11/09/16 Page 5 of 5