Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05225/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05225-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

DAVID MADDOX, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

LEWIS, et. al., )

) 

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 02-5225 DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM 285 FORMS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights second

amended complaint filed on May 19, 2003. The second amended complaint appears to state

cognizable claims for relief for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against the named

defendants. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for defendants Lewis, Robinson, Neubarth, Huang and Young.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff five (5) USM-285 forms, five (5)

summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the second amended complaint filed May 19, 2003.

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

Court with the following documents:

Case 1:02-cv-05225-DLB Document 63 Filed 11/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Six (6) copies of the endorsed second amended complaint filed May 19, 2006.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 30, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05225-DLB Document 63 Filed 11/30/06 Page 2 of 2