Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01324/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01324-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C:\Documents and Settings\Lc2lor\Local Settings\Temp\notes1C7949\08cv1324-Briefing Sch Mtn Dissolve.wpd, 989 -1- 08cv1324

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESTER BURNETT,

CDCR #V-35245,

Civil No. 08cv1324 L (PCL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

(1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS EX

PARTE APPLICATION TO SUBMIT

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

REGARDING DISSOLVING THE

COURT’ S MAY 6, 2009 ORDER

GRANTING PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION; AND

(2) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

[Doc No. 56]

vs.

DUGAN; KINJI L. HAWTHORNE;

BROWN; FRAZE; D. KHATRI;

VICTOR ALMAGER; BARRERAS,

Defendants.

On August 5, 2009, Ester Burnett (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding in pro se and in

forma pauperis filed a motion for temporary restraining order. [Doc. No. 45]. Defendants filed

an Opposition to Plaintiff’s request for a new restraining order and indicated to the Court that

they would also be moving to dissolve the preliminary injunction previously granted by the

Court. On September 2, 2009, Defendants filed an “Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File

Application to Submit Supplemental Briefing Regarding Dissolving the Court’s May 6, 2009

Order granting Preliminary Injunction” [Doc. No. 56]. 

Case 3:08-cv-01324-L-WVG Document 58 Filed 09/08/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C:\Documents and Settings\Lc2lor\Local Settings\Temp\notes1C7949\08cv1324-Briefing Sch Mtn Dissolve.wpd, 989 -2- 08cv1324

In this request, Defendants seek to dissolve the Court’s May 6, 2009 Order granting

Plaintiff a preliminary injunction. In support of this request, Defendants have submitted

documents filed in Opposition to Plaintiff’s most recent preliminary injunction motion and the

additional briefing filed on September 2, 2009 [Doc. Nos. 49-56]. 

Defendants’ Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Application to Submit Supplemental

Briefing Regarding Dissolving the Court’s May 6, 2009 Order is GRANTED [Doc. No. 56].

Plaintiff may file an Opposition to Defendants’ request to dissolve the preliminary injunction

issued on May 6, 2009 no later than Monday, October 5, 2009. Following these submissions,

the Court will, in its discretion, consider Defendants’ Motion to Dissolve as submitted on the

papers, and will issue its written opinion soon thereafter. Thus, unless otherwise ordered, no

appearances are required and no oral argument will be heard. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: September 8, 2009

M. James Lorenz

United States District Court Judge

COPY TO:

HON. PETER C. LEWIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ALL PARTIES/COUNSEL

Case 3:08-cv-01324-L-WVG Document 58 Filed 09/08/09 Page 2 of 2