Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01127/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01127-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

LAPLANTE, SPINELLI & DONALD

a professional corporation

815 S Street, Second Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

TELEPHONE (916) 448-7888 - FACSIMILE (916) 448-6888

Domenic D. Spinelli, Esq. (State Bar No. 131192)

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

GREG MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEIRDRE PRICE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GREG MOODY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 2:05-CV-01127-DFL-KJM

STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING

THE STATUS (PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING)

ORDER DATED AUGUST 22, 2005

As a result of the pending motion for summary judgment and the upcoming date for disclosure of

expert witnesses, the parties, through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request the court to order

an amendment to the Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order as follows:

Discovery: All discovery shall be completed by August 18, 2006. In this context, "completed"

means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes

relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order, if necessary, and, where discovery has

been ordered, the order has been complied with. 

Disclosure of Expert Witnesses: The parties shall make expert witness disclosure under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by June 20, 2006. Supplemental disclosure and disclosure of any

rebuttal experts under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(c) shall be made by June 30, 2006. 

Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all likelihood will

preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial absent a showing that the necessity

Case 2:05-cv-01127-DFL -KJM Document 35 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

for the witness could not have been reasonably anticipated at the time the disclosures were ordered and that

the failure to make timely disclosure did not prejudice any other party. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c).

All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render an informed

opinion, and give their reasons therefore, so that they will be able to give full and complete testimony at

any deposition taken by the opposing parties. Experts will not be permitted to testify at the trial as to any

information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition taken subsequent to designation.

All remaining dates and requirements set forth in the August 27, 2005 Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling)

Order remain in full force and effect. 

DATED: May 24, 2006 LAPLANTE SPINELLI & DONALD

/s/ Domenic D. Spinelli

By: 

DOMENIC D. SPINELLI

Attorneys for Defendant GREG MOODY

/s/ Ronald H. Wecht

Dated: May 24 , 2006 By: 

RONALD H. WECHT,

Attorneys for Plaintiff, DEIRDRE PRICE

ORDER

The Court hereby orders the amendment to the Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order 

as stipulated to above. The amendment are effective immediately. All other aspects of the original

Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order remain in full force and effect. 

Dated: 5/30/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01127-DFL -KJM Document 35 Filed 05/31/06 Page 2 of 2