Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01413/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01413-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Marco A. Madrueno; and Priscilla Ann

Hendrix,

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Michael A. Bosco, Jr., et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-1413-PHX-DGC

ORDER

This case arises out of a trustee’s sale of real property located in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Plaintiffs filed their complaint against Defendants on July 6, 2009, alleging numerous causes

of action including fraudulent misrepresentation, negligence, civil conspiracy, intentional

reckless acts, violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and violation of numerous other

federal statutes. Doc. 1. The Court dismissed several Defendants for Plaintiffs’ failure to

prosecute, but granted leave to amend the complaint, warning Plaintiffs that if the

deficiencies described in the motion to dismiss (Doc. 15) were not resolved, the claims would

be dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 27. The amended complaint, filed on February 19, 2010,

asserted ten claims for relief. Doc. 28.

In an order dated April 20, 2010, the Court granted the renewed motion to dismiss

(Doc. 31) and dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. Doc. 37. The Court found that

Defendant Michael Bosco is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees under A.R.S.

§ 33-807(E) because Plaintiffs had not alleged or explained how Bosco, as trustee, breached

duties under the deed of trust or Arizona law. Id. at 8; see Schroeder v. M & I Bank, No. cvCase 2:09-cv-01413-DGC Document 41 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

08-2190-PHX-ROS, 2009 WL 210624, at *1 (D. Ariz. July 16, 2009) (awarding fees to

improperly joined trustee under § 33-807(E)).

Bosco has filed a motion seeking an award of attorneys’ fees in the amount of $4,620.

Doc. 39. No response has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. See Doc. 37

at 8; see also LRCiv 54.2(b)(3). Having reviewed the supporting affidavit of counsel

(Doc. 40), and having considered the record as a whole and the relevant fee award factors,

see Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 429-30 & n.3 (1983), the Court finds the requested

fee award to be reasonable and appropriate. See also LRCiv 54.2(c)(3) (listing factors

bearing on the reasonableness of a fee award); Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner, 694

P.2d 1181, 1184 (Ariz. 1985) (same). The Court, pursuant to A.R.S. § 33-807(E), will grant

Bosco’s motion and award him attorneys’ fees in the amount of $4,620. See Cervantes v.

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., No. CV 09-517-PHX-JAT, 2010 WL 1038658, at *2 (D.

Ariz. Mar. 19, 2010) (awarding trustee more than $9,000 in fees under § 33-807(E)).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant Michael Bosco, Jr.’s motion for award of attorneys’ fees (Doc. 39)

is granted.

2. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 33-807(E), attorneys’ fees in the amount of $4,620.00 are

awarded in favor of Defendant Michael Bosco, Jr. and against Plaintiffs Marco

A. Madrueno and Priscilla Ann Hendrix (also known as Priscilla Ann

Saladores).

DATED this 21st day of July, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-01413-DGC Document 41 Filed 07/21/10 Page 2 of 2