Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00165/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00165-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT RAFFAELLY and

CHARLES SCHNEPP,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-06-0165 FCD DAD PS

vs.

SISKIYOU COUNTY BOARD OF

SUPERVISORS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On July 12, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiffs have filed

objections to the findings and recommendations and defendants have filed a reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:06-cv-00165-FCD-DAD Document 63 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 12, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Moving defendants’ motions to dismiss are granted;

3. Plaintiff Raffaelly’s federal claims alleged under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985

are dismissed as barred by res judicata as to defendants County of Siskiyou; Sierra Pacific

Industries; Fruit Growers Supply Company; The Hearst Corporation; Roseburg Forest Products

Co.; Timber Products Company; and Hancock Timber Resource Group;

4. Plaintiff Schnepp’s federal claims are dismissed as to the same defendants for

failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and 

5. Plaintiffs’ state law claims as to those defendants are dismissed without

prejudice.

DATED:August 2, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00165-FCD-DAD Document 63 Filed 08/02/06 Page 2 of 2