Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01659/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01659-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman,

803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COREY D. DUNN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1659 MCE EFB P

vs.

USA, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, an individual in state custody who is awaiting trial on federal criminal

charges pending in this court in Case No. 05-0453 WBS1

, has filed an application for habeas

corpus relief on a California state court form application for a writ of habeas corpus. 

By court order filed August 29, 2006, the court vacated a previous order directing

respondents to file an answer. Therefore, respondents’ September 26, 2006, motion to discharge

the order to answer will be denied as moot. 

Also by court order filed August 29, 2006, the court ordered the Order and

Findings and Recommendations set forth therein to be served on petitioner at San Quentin State

Case 2:06-cv-01659-MCE -EFB Document 16 Filed 11/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Prison, as it appeared to the court from records in petitioner’s federal criminal case that

petitioner had been returned to that prison. That mail was returned as undeliverable. Good

cause appearing, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to re-serve the court’s Order and

Findings and Recommendations on petitioner at his address of record. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent’s September 26, 2006, motion to discharge order to answer is

denied as moot.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall reserve the court’s Order and Findings and

Recommendations filed August 29, 2006, on petitioner at his address of record. 

Dated: November 13, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-01659-MCE -EFB Document 16 Filed 11/14/06 Page 2 of 2