Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_18-cv-02628/USCOURTS-azd-2_18-cv-02628-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Ammed Hassan, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-18-02628-PHX-SRB (BSB)

ORDER 

 Petitioner filed a Motion to Stay this proceeding on October 25, 2018. Respondents 

filed their response in opposition on October 29, 2018 and Petitioner replied on November 

8, 2018. On November 14, 2018 the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and 

Recommendation recommending that Petitioner’s Motion to Stay be denied. Petitioner 

filed timely written objections on December 3, 2018 to which Respondents filed a response 

in opposition on December 10, 2018. 

 This Court having made a de novo review will overrule Petitioner’s objections and 

deny the Motion to Stay. 

 Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation do not appear to be 

objecting to the denial of the Motion to Stay so much as arguing whether some of the claims 

set forth in his Petition are validly before the Court. Any decision on whether Petitioner’s 

claims have been fully exhausted and are validly presented before this Court will be 

decided when the Petition is addressed and not discussed in connection with this Motion 

to Stay. Neither in his Motion nor in his objections has Petitioner set forth any valid basis 

Case 2:18-cv-02628-SRB Document 23 Filed 12/11/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

to stay his habeas petition pending a ruling by the United States Supreme Court on a 

pending Petition for Writ of Certiorari. Therefore, 

 IT IS ORDERED overruling Petitioner’s objections to the Report and 

Recommendation. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge as the Order of this Court. (Doc. 12) 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Petitioner’s Motion to Stay. (Doc. 9) 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file his reply to Respondents’ 

Limited Answer to his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus not later than 30 days from the 

date of this Order. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Petitioner’s Request for Extension 

of Time to Allow Petitioner to Gather Records and Case Law. (Doc. 21) 

 

 Dated this 11th day of December, 2018. 

Case 2:18-cv-02628-SRB Document 23 Filed 12/11/18 Page 2 of 2