Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00536/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00536-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEIL DARROW, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

SCRIBNER, Warden, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-00536 OWW-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 33)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 32)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On February 14, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed Findings and

Recommendations recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as moot

due to the death of Petitioner. (Doc. 33). The Findings and Recommendations were served on

all remaining parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within ten days

from the date of service of that order. To date, no objections have been filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Case 1:06-cv-00536-OWW -TAG Document 35 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 14, 2008 (Doc. 33), are 

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 32), is GRANTED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED as MOOT; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00536-OWW -TAG Document 35 Filed 03/13/08 Page 2 of 2