Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03352/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03352-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO. C 06-03352 SC

RIMAC & MARTIN, P.C.

JOSEPH M. RIMAC - State Bar No. 72381

ANNA M. MARTIN - State Bar No. 154279

amartin@rimacmartin.com

1051 Divisadero Street 

San Francisco, California 94115

Telephone (415) 561-8440

Facsimile (415) 561-8430

Attorneys for Defendants

FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY;

McKINSEY & COMPANY LONG TERM

DISABILITY PLAN

BAUM & WEEMS

JULIAN M. BAUM - State Bar No. 130892

9 Tenaya Lane

Novato, CA 94947

Telephone: (415) 892-3152

Facsimile (415) 892-3096

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DONNA NOLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E-FILING

DONNA NOLAND, an individual, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY; McKINSEY & COMPANY

LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendants.

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 06-03352 SC

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their

designated counsel of record, that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees in this action.

Case 3:06-cv-03352-SC Document 22 Filed 05/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO. C 06-03352 SC

Pursuant to local rules, this document is being electronically filed through the Court’s

ECF System. In this regard, counsel for defendant hereby attests that (1) the content of this

document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) plaintiff’s counsel has

concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is

available for inspection or production if so ordered.

SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

RIMAC & MARTIN

a Professional Corporation

DATED: May 1, 2007 By: /S/ ANNA M. MARTIN 

ANNA M. MARTIN

Attorneys for Defendants

FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY;

McKINSEY & COMPANY LONG TERM

DISABILITY PLAN

BAUM & WEEMS

DATED: May 1, 2007 By: /S/ JULIAN M. BAUM 

JULIAN M. BAUM

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DONNA NOLAND

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________________ _______________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

5/1/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:06-cv-03352-SC Document 22 Filed 05/02/07 Page 2 of 2