Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00010/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00010-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTINA SMITH, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL

PARTNERS, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 10-00010 JSW

ORDER (1) TO SHOW CAUSE

AND (2) SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

On March 29, 2010, the Defendant National Corrective Group, Inc. (“NCG”) and

Defendants Levine Leichtman Capital Partners, Inc. and Levine Leichtman Capital Partners III,

L.P. (collectively, “LLCP”) filed motions to dismiss that exceed the page limits allowed by this

Court’s Standing Order 6, which provides that “[a]ll briefs, whether in support of, in opposition

to, or in reply to any motion, with the exception of summary judgment motions and claims

construction briefs, may not exceed fifteen pages in length, exclusive of title pages, indices of

cases, table of contents, exhibits, and summaries of argument, if required.” Neither NCG nor

LLCP sought leave of court to file an oversize brief.

Accordingly, the NCG and LLCP are HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in

writing by no later than April 1, 2010 as to why their oversized briefs should be allowed and

why the Court should not strike their motions for failure to comply with this Court’s page

limitations.

Case 3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document 27 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants Michael Schreck and Brett Stohlton filed a motion to strike portions of

Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint and noticed it to be heard on June 4, 2010. The Court

HEREBY ORDERS that any opposition to this motion shall be filed by no later than April13,

2010 and any reply brief shall be filed by no later than April 20, 2010.

If the Court determines that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument, it

will so advise the parties in advance of the hearing date. If the parties wish to modify this

schedule, they may submit for the Court’s consideration a stipulation and proposed order

demonstrating good cause for any modification requested.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document 27 Filed 03/30/10 Page 2 of 2