Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_96-cv-00784/USCOURTS-caed-2_96-cv-00784-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLY CARL LYONS,

Petitioner, 2:96-cv-0784-GEB-GGH-P

vs.

THEO WHITE,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 14, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. When the

mail to petitioner was returned, the findings and recommendations were re-served upon

petitioner, at his new and correct address, on April 12, 2007. Petitioner has filed objections to

the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

Case 2:96-cv-00784-GEB-GGH Document 77 Filed 05/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 14, 2007, are adopted in full;

and

2. Petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b)(6), filed on August 10, 2006 is dismissed to the extent that it is a successive petition and

denied to the extent that it is a Rule 60(b) motion.

Dated: May 1, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:96-cv-00784-GEB-GGH Document 77 Filed 05/01/07 Page 2 of 2