Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01631/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01631-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION CASE NO. C 06-01631 PJH 

Michael E. Dergosits (SBN 118206)

DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1450 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 705-6377 

Facsimile: (415) 705-6383 

mdergosits@dergnoah.com

Attorneys for GEE JEFFERY & PARTNERS 

ADVERTISING, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GEE JEFFERY & PARTNERS 

ADVERTISING, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, 

INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO.: C 06-01631 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO ADJOURN THE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IN BEST 

BUY II, CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR 

NOVEMBER 15, 2007, AND TO ALLOW 

THE PARTIES TO APPEAR ON THE 

NEW DATE BY TELEPHONE 

 It is HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective 

counsel that the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for November 15, 2007 at 

2:30 p.m., be adjourned ten days, or to a date that is otherwise convenient for the Court, and that 

counsel for the parties1

 be permitted to participate at the Conference on the adjourned date by 

telephone. 

 

1

 GJP and the Identity Arts Defendants are in the process of attempting to finalize a settlement agreement 

between them in this matter, which is expected to conclude shortly. For this reason, and because the claims against 

them in this action were dismissed pursuant to the Court’s Order of April 18, 2007, counsel for the Identity Arts 

Defendants did not participate in the prior conference and are not expected to participate in the upcoming adjourned 

conference unless ordered by the Court to do so. 

Case 4:06-cv-01631-PJH Document 89 Filed 10/26/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION - 2 - CASE NO. C 06-01631 PJH 

 The reason for the above adjournment is that the Court originally scheduled the Case 

Management Conference when it believed that Judge Spero would be conducting a settlement 

conference with the parties on October 15, 2007. However, Judge Spero subsequently advised 

the parties that an unavoidable conflict had arisen that made it impossible for him to meet with 

the parties on October 15, and that he would not be able to conduct the settlement conference 

until November 6, 2007. As matters now stand, the parties expect to meet with Judge Spero on 

November 6, 2007. However, if this action is not settled at the conference or shortly thereafter, 

the remaining parties will have to meet and confer in order to prepare and submit to the Court a 

revised Joint Case Management Statement. To do so, the parties respectfully request a brief 

adjournment of the Case Management Conference. 

 Further, the Court permitted counsel to participate in prior case management conferences 

by telephone, and counsel respectfully request that, unless this matter is settled, they again be 

permitted to appear and participate by telephone at the upcoming case management conference on 

the new date set by the Court. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD2

. 

DATED: October 23, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Michael Dergosits 

SMITH DORNAN & DEHN, PC 

By: /s/ 

 David Atlas 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Gee Jeffery & Partners 

Advertising, Inc. (in Best Buy II) 

 

2

 Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the filer hereby attests that the 

signatories’ concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

Case 4:06-cv-01631-PJH Document 89 Filed 10/26/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION - 3 - CASE NO. C 06-01631 PJH 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

By: /s/ 

Robert F. Hinton 

David Martinez 

Attorneys for Defendant AMC Entertainment Inc. 

(in Best Buy II). 

HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP

By: /s/ 

Roger R. Myers 

Attorneys for Defendants Best Buy Enterprise 

Services, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc. and Sprint 

Corporation (in Best Buy II) 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ By: 

 THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 

 United States District Judge 

10/26/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-01631-PJH Document 89 Filed 10/26/07 Page 3 of 3