Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00124/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00124-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND PIERSON, III,

Plaintiff,

v.

SUTTER HEALTH, et al., 

Defendants.

No. 2:20–cv–124–TLN–KJN (PS)

ORDER

(ECF No. 4)

Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for electronic case filing. (ECF

No. 4.) Generally, “any person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing except with the 

permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.” See E.D. Cal. L.R. 133(b)(2). Plaintiff’s 

motion for electronic case filing does not provide any good cause for deviance from the Local 

Rule applicable to unrepresented litigants. As such, the motion is DENIED.

Dated: February 6, 2020

pier.124

Case 2:20-cv-00124-TLN-KJN Document 5 Filed 02/06/20 Page 1 of 1