Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03410/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03410-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

{00242529v1} -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION (C 06 4679 JF (HRL) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ROBERT J. YORIO (SBN 93178) 

yorio@carrferrell.com 

CHRISTINE S. WATSON (SBN 218006) 

cwatson@carrferrell.com 

CARR & FERRELL LLP

2200 Geng Road 

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 812-3400 

Facsimile: (650) 812-3444 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 

NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., a 

California corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

APROPOS TECHNOLOGY, INC., an Illinois 

corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

AND RELATED CROSS ACTION. 

CASE NO. C 06-3410 CW

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION 

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. and Defendant and 

Counter-Claimant APROPOS TECHNOLOGY, INC. hereby stipulate to a dismissal with prejudice 

of this entire action, including the Complaint and Counterclaim, pursuant to the provisions of Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). The parties further agree to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit 

incurred herein. 

 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Case 4:06-cv-03410-CW Document 37 Filed 08/22/07 Page 1 of 2
{00242529v1} -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION (C 06 4679 JF (HRL) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: August 17, 2007 CARR & FERRELL LLP

By: /s/ 

ROBERT J. YORIO 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 

NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. 

Dated: August 17, 2007 NIXON PEABODY LLC 

By: /s/ by permission 

PATRICK T. MICHAEL, ESQ. 

 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant 

APROPOS TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

ORDER

 Based on the parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, the Complaint and Counterclaim 

are dismissed with prejudice. The parties are to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit 

incurred herein. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 8/22 

Dated: __________, 2007 By: 

HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:06-cv-03410-CW Document 37 Filed 08/22/07 Page 2 of 2