Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03616/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03616-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

JOSEPH OLIVERA, an individual, and 

JACQUELINE JULTY, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE 

SERVICING, INC., a Delaware Corporation; 

AMERICAN BROKERS CONDUIT, a Delaware 

Limited Liability Company; CAL COAST 

FINANCIAL CORPORATION; a California 

Corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No: C 09-3616 SBA 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiffs, Joseph Olivera and Jacqueline Julty, allege that they were defrauded by various 

defendants, including American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (AHMSI), in connection with the 

refinancing of their home. On January 22, 2010, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to 

amend certain claims. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on February 4, 2010. 

On February 11, 2010, AHMSI filed a separate Case Management Conference statement in 

anticipation of the conference set for February 17, 2010. Plaintiffs’ input was not included in the 

statement due to Plaintiffs’ counsel’s illness. However, AHMSI notes in its statement that it 

intends to bring a motion to dismiss in response to the amended complaint. Given Plaintiffs’ 

failure to join in the CMC statement filed by AHMSI, coupled with AHMSI’s stated intention to 

file a motion to dismiss, the Court, in the interests of judicial efficiency, will set a briefing schedule 

Case 4:09-cv-03616-SBA Document 29 Filed 02/17/10 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

on the motion to dismiss and continue the CMC conference to coincide with the hearing on the 

motion. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. AHMSI shall file its motion to dismiss by no later than February 23, 2010. 

2. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to the motion to dismiss by March 9, 2010. 

Plaintiffs are warned that the failure to file a timely response may be deemed to be a consent to the 

granting of the motion to dismiss. 

3. AHMSI shall file its reply by no later than March 16, 2010. 

4. The hearing on the motion to dismiss will take place on April 20, 2010 at 1:00 p.m.

in Courtroom 1, United States Courthouse, 1301 Clay St., Oakland, California 94612. The Court 

may resolve the motion without oral argument prior to or after the hearing date, pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b). The parties are advised the check the Court’s website to determine 

whether an appearance on the motion is required. 

5. The CMC currently scheduled for February 17, 2010 is CONTINUED to 

April 20, 2010, and shall immediately follow the hearing on the motion. The parties shall meet 

and confer prior to the conference and shall prepare a joint Case Management Conference 

Statement which shall be filed no later than ten (10) days prior to the Case Management 

Conference that complies with the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of 

California and the Standing Order of this Court. Plaintiffs shall be responsible for filing the 

statement. If the motion to dismiss is taken off calendar, the CMC will not proceed as scheduled 

and will be reset, if appropriate. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 16, 2010 _______________________________ 

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:09-cv-03616-SBA Document 29 Filed 02/17/10 Page 2 of 2