Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-00916/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-00916-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FELIPE POLANCO DIAZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARIA TORCEDO,

Defendant.

No. 2:21-cv-00916 KJM KJN P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Court orders and findings and recommendations served on plaintiff’s address of record 

have been returned by the postal service. (ECF Nos. 26, 27, 31, 32, 34, & 38.) Attempts to reserve plaintiff have also been returned. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local 

Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any 

address change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the May 18, 2023 court order and 

findings and recommendations were returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to 

notify the Court of a current address.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

Case 2:21-cv-00916-DC-CSK Document 40 Filed 11/07/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 

days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: November 7, 2023

/diaz0916.33a

Case 2:21-cv-00916-DC-CSK Document 40 Filed 11/07/23 Page 2 of 2