Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01193/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01193-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY E. WALKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOHADJER, Clinical Psychologist, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-1193 WBS AC P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 3, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court observes that the instant motion is largely duplicative of previously denied 

requests for immediate injunctive relief by plaintiff. ECF No. 32. The order denying these 

motions is currently on appeal. See ECF Nos. 41, 42. In the Ninth Circuit appeal, the briefing 

has been stayed until January 17, 2014 pending the adjudication of the current motion in this 

court. See Order filed on December 17, 2013 (entry no. 10) in Docket No. 13-17041. 

Case 2:13-cv-01193-WBS-AC Document 50 Filed 01/07/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 3, 2013, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a TRO or preliminary injunction (ECF No. 38) is DENIED.

Dated: January 6, 2014

walk1193.804

Case 2:13-cv-01193-WBS-AC Document 50 Filed 01/07/14 Page 2 of 2