Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01968/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01968-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 11:101 Bankruptcy

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RITA WARREN,

 Appellant,

v. 

GLENN MICHAEL CYBULSKI,

 Appellee.

Case No.: 15-cv-1968-YGR

ORDER ON ADDITIONAL BRIEFING

On July 24, 2015, the Court directed appellant Rita Warren to perfect the record below in 

order to pursue her appeal in this Court. (Dkt. No. 8.) The Court further ordered appellant to file and 

serve a supplemental brief not to exceed fifteen (15) pages in length within fourteen (14) days after 

the record was perfected. The record was perfected on September 17, 2015. (Dkt. No. 31). In light 

of appellant’s pro se status, and her apparent confusion over the supplemental briefing requirements

(see Dkt. No. 32), the Court hereby extends appellant’s deadline to file her supplemental brief by an 

additional fourteen (14) days. 

Accordingly, appellant is hereby ORDERED to file and serve her supplemental brief no later 

than October 15, 2015. Appellee’s deadline to file and serve a supplemental brief addressing the 

additional documents, as well as appellant’s supplemental brief, not to exceed fifteen (15) pages in 

length, is similarly extended to within fourteen (14) of service of appellant’s supplemental brief. 

Appellant is reminded that her brief must be drafted in accordance with FRBP 8014(a) and 

address the documents added to the record, including the transcript of the hearing at issue. Further,

the Court refers appellant to its previous Order (Dkt. No. 8) listing the substance of what appellant 

must include in her brief under FRBP 8014(a). Appellant is specifically reminded to include:

(5) a statement of the issues presented and, for each one, a concise 

statement of the applicable standard of appellate review;

Case 4:15-cv-01968-YGR Document 33 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

(6) a concise statement of the case setting out the facts relevant to the 

issues submitted for review, describing the relevant procedural history, 

and identifying the rulings presented for review, with appropriate 

references to the record;

(7) a summary of the argument, which must contain a succinct, clear, and 

accurate statement of the arguments made in the body of the brief, and 

which must not merely repeat the argument headings; and

(8) the argument, which must contain the appellant’s contentions and the 

reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record 

on which the appellant relies.

Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8014(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 24, 2015

____________________________________

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:15-cv-01968-YGR Document 33 Filed 09/24/15 Page 2 of 2