Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01807/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01807-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT DANIEL McKISSICK,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMADOR COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:19-cv-1807 KJN P

ORDER and FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed December 4, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and 

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to 

this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

Case 2:19-cv-01807-JAM-KJN Document 17 Filed 01/22/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: January 22, 2020

mcki1807.fta

Case 2:19-cv-01807-JAM-KJN Document 17 Filed 01/22/20 Page 2 of 2