Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00700/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00700-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 On February 2, 2007, all other retaliation claims and plaintiff’s claims for denial of access to the courts 1

were dismissed from this action, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted;

plaintiff’s ADA claim against defendant Mata was dismissed from this action, with prejudice, for failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted; and all defendants other than Mata were dismissed from this action based

on plaintiff’s failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted against them. (Doc. 14.)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACK ALLEN WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00700-LJO-SMS PC

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF AMENDED

COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE, AND

FORWARDING SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO

PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND

RETURN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Docs. 12 and 14) 

Plaintiff Jack Allen Wilson (“plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on

June 1, 2005. The court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and

found that it states a cognizable claim for relief under section 1983 against defendant Mata on

plaintiff’s retaliation claim arising from defendant Mata’s repeated refusal/failure to provide plaintiff

with access to his legal material in R&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 1

U.S. 506, 512-15 (2002); Austin v. Terhune, 367 F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2004); Jackson v. Carey,

353 F.3d 750, 754 (9th Cir. 2003); Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara, 307 F.3d 1119, 1125-26 (9th

Cir. 2002). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

///

Case 1:05-cv-00700-LJO -SMS Document 16 Filed 04/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendant:

C/O MATA

2. The Clerk of the Courtshall send plaintiff one (1) USM-285 form, one (1) summons,

a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

amended complaint filed March 27, 2006.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Two (2) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed March 27, 2006. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendant and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendant pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 13, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00700-LJO -SMS Document 16 Filed 04/16/07 Page 2 of 2