Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00677/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00677-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Schedule 

CV 08-00677 CRB (PC)

Caroline N. Mitchell (State Bar No. 143124)

cnmitchell@JonesDay.com

Nathaniel P. Garrett (State Bar No. 248211)

ngarrett@JonesDay.com

Amir Q. Amiri (State Bar No. 271224)

aamiri@jonesday.com

Daniel L. Corbett (State Bar No. 286103)

dcorbett@jonesday.com

JONES DAY

555 California Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415.626.3939

Facsimile: 415.875.5700

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARVELLOUS AMIR WARRIOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

Marvellous Asha Xyah Greene

also known as

Marvellous Asha Xyah

also known as

Marcellus Alexander Greene

also known as

Marvellous Amir Warrior,

Plaintiff,

v.

Fernando Gonzalez, et al.,

Defendant.

Case No. CV 08-00677 CRB (PC)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER AMENDING DISCOVERY 

SCHEDULE

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

WHEREAS on April 4, 2014, the parties appeared at a Case Management Conference, at 

which time the Court set December 12, 2014 as the deadline for dispositive motions, and ordered 

the parties to submit a joint pre-trial schedule based on that date; 

WHEREAS on April 25, 2014, the Court approved the parties’ stipulated pre-trial 

schedule based on the Court’s Order;

Case 1:08-cv-00677-CRB Document 83 Filed 06/26/14 Page 1 of 4 Case 1:08-cv-00677-CRB Document 84 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Schedule 

CV 08-00677 CRB (PC)

WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the stipulated pre-trial schedule to allow 

additional time for completion of fact discovery, in light of the following facts: 

1. On June 20, 2014, Defendant produced over 1,100 documents to Plaintiff. Plaintiff will 

require additional time to review and analyze this substantial production before the July 

3, 2014 deadline for serving additional discovery requests, deposition notices and 

subpoenas. 

2. Any supplemental or additional production by Defendant is subject to the parties 

agreement on, and the Court’s approval of, a Stipulated Protective Order. Defendant’s 

first set of document contains redacted information that, Defendant contends, is 

“confidential” under California law and could compromise institutional security if 

disclosed. The parties anticipate that the Protective Order will establish a procedure 

under which the parties will meet and confer about potential production of unredacted 

confidential documents, after Plaintiff has reviewed redacted versions. Under the 

current schedule, the parties will be unable to implement this procedure before the 

deadline passes for serving additional discovery requests, deposition notices and 

subpoenas. 

3. Plaintiff’s counsel is having significant, ongoing difficulties communicating with 

Plaintiff, who is incarcerated at Pelican Bay Correctional Institution in Crescent City, 

California, near the Oregon border. Pelican Bay staff has informed both Plaintiff’s 

counsel and Defendant’s counsel that the institution’s policy is to provide confidential 

phone calls only if required by court order. This is due to the significant staff resources 

that would be required to provide inmates additional telephone calls, coupled with the 

availability of regularly scheduled attorney visiting hours. Pelican Bay is located over 

six-hours driving distance from Plaintiff’s counsel’s office. As a result, Plaintiff has 

requested, and Defendant has granted, an extension of time until July 3, 2014, to 

respond to Defendant’s discovery requests. Defendant will have little time to review 

Plaintiff’s discovery responses before the deadline to propound additional discovery 

requests, deposition notices and subpoenas.

Case 1:08-cv-00677-CRB Document 83 Filed 06/26/14 Page 2 of 4 Case 1:08-cv-00677-CRB Document 84 Filed 06/30/14 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Schedule 

CV 08-00677 CRB (PC)

WHEREAS, the parties’ stipulated amended schedule will not cause undue delay in the 

resolution of this case, in light of the parties substantial progress in discovery and their ongoing 

cooperation in resolving remaining issues relating to confidentiality and scheduling, as described 

above.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to the Court’s approval, that the following 

amended schedule shall govern pretrial proceedings in this matter:

Date Set by Order 

Dated 4/25/14

Stipulated 

Amended Date

Event

August 4, 2014 October 17, 2014 Deadline for completion of fact discovery.

August 18, 2014 October 31, 2014 Deadline for the Parties to identify any expert 

witnesses who may be used at trial and provide 

reports pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2)(B).

September 1, 2014 November 14, 2014 Deadline for the Parties to identify any rebuttal 

expert witnesses who may be used at trial and 

provide reports pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2)(B).

September 22, 2014 December 5, 2014 Deadline to complete expert depositions.

October 24, 2014 December 26, 2014 Deadline for Parties to file dispositive motions.

 Dated: June 26, 2014 JONES DAY

By: /s/ Daniel L. Corbett

Daniel L. Corbett

JONES DAY

555 California Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

(415) 626-3939

dcorbett@jonesday.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 1:08-cv-00677-CRB Document 83 Filed 06/26/14 Page 3 of 4 Case 1:08-cv-00677-CRB Document 84 Filed 06/30/14 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 4 -

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Schedule 

CV 08-00677 CRB (PC)

Dated: June 26, 2014 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

By: /s/ Russa M. Boyd

Russa M. Boyd

California Department of Justice

1300 "I" Street 

P.O. Box 944255 

Sacramento, CA 94244 

(916) 319-9476 

Russa.Boyd@doj.ca.gov 

Attorneys for Defendant 

The below filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from the above Signatories. 

Dated: June 26, 2014 

 /s/ Daniel L. Corbett 

 Daniel L. Corbett 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________ ______________________________ Charles R. Breyer

United States District Judge

SFI-864339v2 

Case 1:08-cv-00677-CRB Document 83 Filed 06/26/14 Page 4 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 1:08-cv-00677-CRB Document 84 Filed 06/30/14 Page 4 of 4