Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00025/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00025-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th &amp; 8th Amendment

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BHAJAN SINGH BARIANA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0025 FCD EFB PS

vs.

G. HARDY ACREE (DIRECTOR OF

AIRPORTS); HADI KAKAR ORDER

(PRESIDENT of SITOA); 

SACRAMENTO INDEPENDENT

TAXI OWNERS [ASSOCIATION] (SITOA);

SACRAMENTAL INTERNATIONAL

AIRPORT,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

On February 1, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff filed objections on

February 9, 2007, defendant Acree filed a reply to plaintiff’s objections on February 23, 2007,

and they were considered by the undersigned.

This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to

which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920

Case 2:06-cv-00025-FCD-EFB Document 34 Filed 03/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

(1982). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made,

the court assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed February 1, 2007, are

ADOPTED; 

2. Defendant G. Hardee Acree’s motion to dismiss is granted without further

leave to amend; 

3. The motion to dismiss filed by Hadi Kakar and Sacramento Independent Taxi

Owners Association is granted without further leave to amend;

4. Defendant “Sacramento International Airport” is dismissed pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 4(m) and, alternatively 12(b)(6); and, 

5. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DATED: March 7, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00025-FCD-EFB Document 34 Filed 03/08/07 Page 2 of 2