Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00436/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00436-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

:; 

t. 

ok 

.. .. 

z -'

 

.. 0 0.

.. 

o '"

 ..

DAVID S. BLOCH (No. 184530)

JENNIFER L. ISHIMOTO (No. 211845)

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

3150 Porter Drive

Palo Alto, CA 94304- 1212

Telephone: 650.813.5000

Facsimile: 650.813.5100

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DIOPTICS MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INe.

Eric A. Hanscom (CSB No. 183359)

6994 EI Camino Real, #204

Carlsbad, CA 92009

Telephone: (760)804- 1712

Facsimile: (760)494-3014

Attorney for Defendant

EYE OJO CORPORATION dba

GREA TTECH VISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

DIOPTICS MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INe.

a California corporation

Civil Case No. 05-00436 (HRL)

STIPULATED DISMISSAL

Plaintiff

EYE OJO CORPORATION dba

GREATTECH VISION

an Californa corporation

Defendant.

Plaintiff Dioptics Medical Products, Inc. ("Dioptics ) and defendant Eye Ojo Corporation

dba Greattech Vision ("Eye Ojo ) have reached a confidential settlement of this case. As par of

this confidential settlement, the paries have agreed to the entry of this Stipulated Dismissal with

Prejudice, including the terms and conditions set forth below:

STIPULATED DISMISSAL Civil Case No. 05-00436 (HRL)

Case 5:05-cv-00436-HRL Document 12 Filed 07/22/05 Page 1 of 3
t. ~

....

~ ~ 0 z -'

.. 0 0.

.. 

0'"

..

The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the paries to the extent necessary to

enforce the terms of this Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice and the confidential settlement

agreement reached between the parties, the terms of which are expressly incorporated herein by

reference as though fully set forth.

This Stipulated Dismissal shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of

Dioptics and Eye Ojo and each oftheir respective licensees, subsidiaries, corporate parents

affliates, and/or successors and assigns.

This action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUICE.

Dated: July 15, 2005 Respectfully submitted

McDermott Will & Emery LLP

By: Isl Jennifer L. Ishimoto

David S. Bloch

Jennifer L. Ishimoto

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DIOPTICS MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INe.

Dated: July 15 , 2005 Respectfully submitted

By: Isl Eric A. Hanscom

Eric A. Hanscom

Attorney for Defendant

EYE OJO CORPORATION dba

GREATTECH VISION

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

Hon. Howard R. Lloyd

ited States Magistrate Judge

Northern District of California

STIPULATED DISMISSAL - 2 - Civil Case No. 05-00436 (HRL)

Case 5:05-cv-00436-HRL Document 12 Filed 07/22/05 Page 2 of 3
t. ~

-; 0

.. 0: 

.. ..

~ ~ 0 z -'

t: 8 0'"

:; ..

CERTIFICATION BY JENNER L. ISHIMOTO PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE NO. 45

SECTION X. RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California, and am an

associate in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP, counsel for plaintiff Dioptics

Medical Products, Inc. in this matter. The statements herein are made on my personal knowledge

and if called as a witness I could and would testify thereto.

The above e- filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that

concurrence has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared

document with the Cour. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support

this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered, or for inspection upon

request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any).

I declare under penalty of peljury under the laws of the state of California that the

foregoing is tre and correct on this 15th day of July, 2005.

MPK 94304- 1.070302.0017

STIPULATED DISMISSAL - 3 - Civil Case No. 05-00436 (HRL)

Case 5:05-cv-00436-HRL Document 12 Filed 07/22/05 Page 3 of 3