Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00280/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00280-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT TUNSTALL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0280 LKK CMK P

vs.

J. YENTES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On March 10, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued an order stating service is

appropriate against three defendants and plaintiff lists several other defendants, but it is not clear

how they are connected with any alleged civil rights violations. On April 4, 2005, plaintiff filed

a request for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 72-303(b), states “rulings by Magistrate

Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within ten court

days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties.” E.D. Local Rule 72-303(b). 

Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order of March 10, 2005 is

therefore untimely.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00280-LKK -CMK Document 13 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s April 4, 2005 request for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: July 12, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/tuns0280.851

Case 2:05-cv-00280-LKK -CMK Document 13 Filed 07/12/05 Page 2 of 2