Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965-108/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ATOPTECH’S ADMIN. MOT. & MOT. 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER

Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

Paul Alexander (#49997) 

Paul.Alexander@aporter.com 

Martin R. Glick (#40187) 

Marty.Glick@aporter.com 

Sean M. Callagy (#255230) 

Sean.Callagy@aporter.com 

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 

Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 

Telephone: (415) 471-3100 

Facsimile: (415) 471-3400 

Philip W. Marsh (#276383) 

Philip.Marsh@aporter.com 

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 

1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 110 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216 

Telephone: (650) 798-2920 

Facsimile: (650) 798-2999 

Denise McKenzie (#193313) 

Denise.McKenzie@aporter.com 

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 

777 South Figueroa Street 

Forty-Fourth Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90017-5844 

Telephone: (213) 243-4000 

Facsimile: (213) 243-4199 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ATOPTECH, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SYNOPSYS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ATOPTECH, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:13-cv-02965 MMC (DMR)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT ATOPTECH, INC.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER 

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING 

IN PART MOTION TO FILE UNDER 

SEAL [ECF NO. 740]

PART AND VACATING IN PART ORDER, FILED MAY 16, 2016; DIRECTIONS TO RECONSIDERATION; GRANTING MOTION ^

CONSTRUING AS MOTION FOR FOR RECONSIDERATION; MODIFYING IN PLAINTIFF

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 742 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ATOPTECH’S ADMIN. 

MOT. & MOT. FOR LV. TO FILE MOT. FOR REC. OF ORDER

Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

By Administrative Motion pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 7-9 

and 9-11, Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”) has moved to for leave of this Court to file a 

motion for partial reconsideration of this Court’s May 16, 2016 Order Granting in Part and Denying 

in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to File Under Seal (1) Portions of Its Motion for Permanent Injunction and 

(2) Certain Supporting Declarations and Schedules (“Order”) (ECF No. 740). 

ATopTech indicates it understood no response was due to Synopsys’ multiple motions filed 

on April 7, 2016 (ECF Nos. 723, 727, 728 and 729), because the Court had issued an Order denying 

these motions on April 11, 2016 (ECF No. 732). Upon reviewing the Order, ATopTech promptly 

prepared the Declaration of Henry Chang (“Chang Declaration”), filed in support of its motion, 

which sets forth grounds for sealing certain specifically identified materials filed in connection with 

Synopsys’ Motion for Permanent Injunction, in compliance with Local Rule 79-5(d) and (e). 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS ATopTech’s Administrative 

Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part 

Motion to File Under Seal [ECF No. 740]. The Court hereby modifies its prior Order to provide 

that the following materials shall be sealed: 

Paragraphs 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the Declaration of David Blaauw (ECF No. 724); 

Exhibits 2, 4 and 5 to the Declaration of David Blaauw (ECF Nos. 724-2, 724-4 and 724-5); 

Paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 20 of the Declaration of James Storer (ECF No. 725); 

Exhibits 2, 4 and 5 to the Declaration of James Storer (ECF Nos. 725-2, 725-4 and 725-5); 

Exhibits 4, 5 and 6 to the Declaration of Patrick Michael (ECF Nos. 726-4, 726-5 and 726-

6); and 

The following passages in Synopsys’ Motion for Permanent Injunction, which references the 

foregoing materials, specifically: p. 13, lines 14-23 and 26-29; p. 14, lines 9-15. 

To the extent the Order directs Synopsys to file certain documents in the public record, 

the Order is hereby VACATED, and Synopsys is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public 

record, no later than May 27, 2016, versions of the Motion for Permanent Injunction, Blaauw 

declaration, and Storer declaration, in which, in addition to Synopsys's confidential material, 

 

, ,

^

13, 14, and 15 ,

^

10 - 15, 18, 19 The Court construes ATopTech's Motion for Leave as its Motion for Reconsideration. ^

which included the subject motion to seal, ^

the substantive ^

as premature

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 742 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ATOPTECH’S ADMIN. 

MOT. & MOT. FOR LV. TO FILE MOT. FOR REC. OF ORDER

Case No. 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR)

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________, 2016 

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Judge 

identified in its motion to seal (Dkt. No. 727), ATopTech's confidential material, as 

identified herein, likewise is redacted. May 20

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 742 Filed 05/20/16 Page 3 of 3