Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-216/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE TOSHIBA DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(d)

Case No. 07-5944 SC

MDL No. 1917

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

White & Case LLP

701 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case No. 07-5944 SC

MDL No. 1917

This Document Relates to 

Case No. 13-cv-1173-SC (N.D. Cal.)

SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; 

SHARP ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

HITACHI, LTD., et al.,

 Defendants.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

THE TOSHIBA DEFENDANTS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 

RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(d)

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2382 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 2 Case3:07-cv-05944-SC Document2334-2 Filed01/17/14 Page1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE TOSHIBA DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(d)

Case No. 07-5944 SC

MDL No. 1917

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

White & Case LLP

701 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20005

Upon consideration of the Toshiba Defendants’ Administrative Motion to File 

Documents Under Seal Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(d), submitted in 

connection with the Toshiba Defendants’ Supplement Reply in Support of Their Amended 

Motion to Dismiss Sharp’s Complaint, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the Administrative Motion is hereby GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall file and maintain under seal the portions of the Toshiba 

Defendants’ Supplemental Reply that contain quotations from, or discussion of, discovery 

responses that the parties have designated as “Confidential”; and the Clerk shall maintain 

under seal Exhibit 1 to the Supplemental Reply which consists wholly of material designated 

as “Confidential” by the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ ______________________________

HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case3:07-cv-05944-SC Document2334-2 Filed01/17/14 Page2 of 2

2/12/2014

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2382 Filed 02/12/14 Page 2 of 2