Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00123/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00123-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

PROPOSED ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF SEPARATE JUDGMENT ON COURT’S ORDER OF 

OCTOBER 10, 2007 AND STAYING ACTION ON REMAINING CLAIMS PENDING OUTCOME OF APPEAL

EILEEN M. TEICHERT, City Attorney (SBN 167027) 

MARCOS A. KROPF, Senior Deputy City Attorney, (SBN 180898) 

CITY OF SACRAMENTO 

915 I Street, Room 4010 

Sacramento, CA 95814-2604 

Telephone: (916) 808-5346 

Telecopier: (916) 808-7455 

Attorneys for Defendants 

STEWART KATZ (SBN 127425) 

THE LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ 

555 University Ave #270 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Telephone: (916) 927-5678 

Telecopier: (916) 444-3364 

Attorneys for the Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HERB N. COLLINS; REBECCA 

WILLIAMS COLLINS, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY OF SACRAMENTO; Sacramento 

City Police Detective KEVIN PATTON 

(Badge #673); Sacramento City Police 

Officer (retired) JOHN TREFETHEN 

(Badge # 3057); Sacramento City Police 

Officer MICHELLE SCHRUM (Badge # 

783); Sacramento City Police Officer 

FRANK REYES (Badge # 736); 

Sacramento City Police Officer PAUL 

SCHINDLER (Badge # 702); Sacramento 

City Police Clerk PATRICIA CASSIDY 

(Badge # 6413); and Sacramento City 

Police Detective JEFFREY BEEZLEY 

(Badge #0246), 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 06-CV-00123-RRB-GGH 

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF 

SEPARATE JUDGMENT ON COURT’S 

ORDER OF OCTOBER 10, 2007 AND 

STAYING ACTION ON REMAINING 

CLAIMS PENDING OUTCOME OF APPEAL

Case 2:06-cv-00123-JAM -GGH Document 110 Filed 11/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

PROPOSED ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF SEPARATE JUDGMENT ON COURT’S ORDER OF 

OCTOBER 10, 2007 AND STAYING ACTION ON REMAINING CLAIMS PENDING OUTCOME OF APPEAL

 The parties to this action have requested that the Court enter a separate and final 

judgment, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with respect to the 

Court’s Order of October 10, 2007, so that Plaintiffs may immediately appeal the Court’s 

Order. Additionally, the parties request that the Court stay this action pending the outcome 

of any such appeal. The Court has considered the parties stipulated request. Therefore: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

 1. This Court finds that there is no just reason for delay in the entry of a separate 

final appealable judgment with respect to the adjudicated claims disposed of in this Court’s 

order of October 10, 2007; and 

 2. The Clerk is directed to enter a final judgment as to the claims adjudicated in 

this Court’s Order of October 10, 2007 and Defendants are to recover their costs of suit from 

Plaintiffs as taxed by the Clerk. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: 

 3. This action is stayed and the currently scheduled trial date is vacated pending 

the outcome of any appeal of the claims for which a separate final judgment has been 

entered in accord with this Order; and 

 4. Taxation of costs as to the claims for which a separate final judgment has 

been entered in accord with the Order will be stayed pending the final disposition of this 

entire action. 

DATED: November 14, 2007 

 s/RALPH R. BEISTLINE 

 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00123-JAM -GGH Document 110 Filed 11/15/07 Page 2 of 2