Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04069/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04069-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1141P248 -1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-4069 SI)

PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)

P. BOBBY SHUKLA, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 229736)

PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

The Latham Square Building

1611 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 1450

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-0292

Facsimile: (510) 452-5625

HOWARD MOORE, JR., ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 55228)

KOJO MOORE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 236483)

MOORE & MOORE

445 Bellevue Avenue, Suite 202

Oakland, CA 94610

Telephone: (510) 451-0104

Facsimile: (510) 451-5056

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MOYSE HOWARD, JR.

MICHAEL CHRISTIAN (STATE BAR NO. 173727)

SCOTT OBORNE (STATE BAR NO. 191257)

JANINE R. HUDSON (STATE BAR NO. 206671)

JACKSON LEWIS LLP

199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 394-9400

Facsimile: (415) 394-9401

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOYSE HOWARD, JR.

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER

CORPORATION dba AMTRAK, STEVE

SHELTON, PATSY HALL, JOE DEELY and

DOES 1 through 15 inclusive,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. C05-4069 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO EXTEND NON-EXPERT

DISCOVERY CUTOFF, MEDIATION

DEADLINE AND DEADLINE TO

FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS 

Case 3:05-cv-04069-SI Document 54 Filed 11/10/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-04069-SI Document 55 Filed 11/13/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1141P248 -2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-4069 SI)

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Moyse Howard, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant National

Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Defendant Amtrak”), Steve Shelton, Patsy Hall, and Joe

Deely (“Defendants”) agree that extending the deadline for non-expert discovery from

November 10, 2006 to December 20, 2006 and the mediation deadline from occurring within

the first two weeks of November 2006 to December 20, 2006, will afford the Parties sufficient

time to complete the necessary discovery, depositions and prepare for a meaningful and

productive mediation session;

WHEREAS, extending the deadline for non-expert discovery and for mediation to

December 20, 2006, may result in the settlement of this case on or near December 20, 2006, the

Parties further agree to extend the deadline to file dispositive motions from November 27, 2006

to December 27, 2006;

WHEREAS, the Parties have conducted some depositions in this matter and had

scheduled several depositions in this matter that have been cancelled, now continue diligent

efforts to meet and confer regarding the deposition schedule;

WHEREAS, the Parties have propounded and responded to written discovery in the

form of special interrogatories, request for admissions and requests for production of

documents;

WHEREAS, the aforementioned extension will not affect the March 5, 2007 trial date

or any related pretrial dates set by this Court, and it appears that good cause exists for the entry

of an Order extending the non-expert discovery cutoff and mediation deadline to December 20,

2006 and the deadline to file dispositive motions to December 27, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties that the deadline for

completing non-expert discovery currently set for November 10, 2006 shall be extended to

December 20, 2006, the mediation deadline shall also be extended to December 20, 2006 and

the deadline to file dispositive motions to December 27, 2006;

///

///

///

Case 3:05-cv-04069-SI Document 54 Filed 11/10/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-04069-SI Document 55 Filed 11/13/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1141P248 -3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-4069 SI)

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: November 10, 2006 PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

_______/s/______________________________ 

 P. BOBBY SHUKLA, Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MOYSE HOWARD, JR.

Dated: November 10, 2006 JACKSON LEWIS LLP

____/s/______________________________ 

SCOTT OBORNE, Attorneys for Defendants

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER

CORPORATION dba AMTRAK, STEVE

SHELTON, PATSY HALL, JOE DEELY

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________ _____________________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:05-cv-04069-SI Document 54 Filed 11/10/2006 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-04069-SI Document 55 Filed 11/13/06 Page 3 of 3