Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01229/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01229-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 32:4323 Employment Rights of Uniformed Officers

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

No. CIV S-09-1229 LKK EFB

Plaintiff, 

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Currently noticed for hearing before the undersigned on May 12, 2010 is plaintiff’s

motion to compel discovery. Dckt. No. 40. However, on May 5, 2010, the parties filed a

stipulation and proposed order stating that they are still pursuing settlement of this action and

that they “wish to avoid the expense of arguing a discovery motion.” Dckt. No. 41. Therefore,

the parties requested that the district judge extend the discovery deadline and the deadline by

which to have the pending motion to compel heard. Id. 

On May 6, 2010, the district judge approved the stipulation and proposed order and

authorized plaintiff to refile its motion to compel to be heard by June 9, 2010. Dckt. No. 42. 

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to compel, Dckt. No. 40, is denied without prejudice. If the case

////

////

Case 2:09-cv-01229-LKK -EFB Document 43 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

does not settle, plaintiff may refile the motion for hearing on June 9, 2010, as authorized by the

district judge’s May 6, 2010 order. 

DATED: May 6, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-01229-LKK -EFB Document 43 Filed 05/06/10 Page 2 of 2