Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-04915/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-04915-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID MCDONALD,

Plaintiff,

v.

CP OPCO, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-04915-HSG 

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 

PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 88

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff David McDonald’s administrative motion to file 

under seal portions of his opposition to Insperity PEO Services, L.P.’s motion for judgment on the 

pleadings. See Dkt. No. 88. Plaintiff originally asserted that the portions of the opposition he 

wished to seal “contain information received through third-party discovery and designated as 

confidential by non-party Bright Event Rentals, LLC.” See id. at 1. However, Bright Event 

Rentals, LLC later informed Plaintiff that it did “not intend to file a declaration establishing that 

the designated material is sealable.” See Dkt. No. 91 at 1. Consequently, Plaintiff filed an 

unredacted version of his opposition, see Dkt. No. 92, and requested that the Court deny as moot 

his administrative motion to file under seal, see Dkt. No. 91 at 1.

Based on Plaintiff’s representations and his filing of an unredacted version of his 

opposition on the public docket, the Court DENIES as moot the administrative motion to file 

under seal. This order terminates Dkt. No. 88.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

3/22/2019

Case 4:17-cv-04915-HSG Document 131 Filed 03/22/19 Page 1 of 1