Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01411/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01411-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUHN OIL TOOL, INC., Case No. 05-cv-1411 OWW NEW (TAG)

Plaintiff, FINAL ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

vs. THE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT

COOPER CAMERON WITNESS (Doc. 76) AND PLAINTIFF’S

CORPORATION, MOTION TO MODIFY THE 

 PROTECTIVE ORDER (Doc. 78)

Defendant. (Doc. 88)

______________________________/

On April 5, 2007, defendant in this civil action, Cooper Cameron Corporation,

filed a motion to strike plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc.’s “late designation of expert

[witness].” (Doc. 76). On April 19, 2007, Duhn Oil filed a motion to modify the August

11, 2006, protective order entered in this matter. (Doc. 78). This Court issued a minute

order setting a hearing on both motions to be held on May 14, 2007. (Entry No. 79). On

May 8, 2007, the parties filed their first stipulation and proposed order to continue the

motions hearing, explaining that the extra time would enable them to finalize their joint

statement. (Doc. 80). The Court granted this motion, and two additional stipulated

orders granting continuances due to the parties’ inability to finalize their joint statements.

(Docs. 83, 85, 87). As of May 31, 2007, the hearing on the motions was set for June 18,

2007 – approximately two months after the original May 14, 2007, hearing date.

On June 13, 2007, the parties filed a fourth stipulation and proposed order

requesting a one-week continuance on the basis that they required additional time to

///

Case 1:05-cv-01411-MLH-GSA Document 91 Filed 06/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

finalize their joint statement. (Doc. 88). The parties’repeated requests for continuances,

and this Court’s acquiescence and patience, have come to an end. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

1. The stipulated motion to continue (Doc. 88) the June 18, 2007, hearing to

June 25, 2007 at 11:00 a.m., at 1300 18th Street, Suite A, Bakersfield, California, is

GRANTED; 

2. The parties are FOREWARNED that there will be no additional continuances of

the hearing on these motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2007 /s/ Theresa A. Goldner 

j6eb3d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:05-cv-01411-MLH-GSA Document 91 Filed 06/15/07 Page 2 of 2