Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00379/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00379-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD MOORE, 

Plaintiff,

v.

APPLE MID CAL II, LLC, dba 

APPLEBEE’S NEIGHBORHOOD GRILL 

& BAR; 5561 SULTANA, LLC,

Defendants.

No. 1:15-cv-00379-GEB-GSA

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND 

DISPOSITION

Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Settlement” on July 20, 

2015, in which he states: “Plaintiff . . . has settled the 

above-captioned matter with all Defendants. Plaintiff requests 

that he be given to and including August 19, 2015 to file the 

dispositional documents in order to afford the Parties time to 

complete the settlement.” (Notice of Settlement, ECF No. 12.)

Therefore, a dispositional document shall be filed no 

later than August 19, 2015. Failure to respond by this deadline 

may be construed as consent to dismissal of this action without 

prejudice, and a dismissal order could be filed. See E.D. Cal. 

R. 160(b) (“A failure to file dispositional papers on the date 

prescribed by the Court may be grounds for sanctions.”).

Further, the Status Conference scheduled for hearing on 

August 3, 2015, is continued to commence at 9:00 a.m. on October 

26, 2015, in the event no dispositional document is filed, or if 

Case 1:15-cv-00379-GEB-GSA Document 13 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

this action is not otherwise dismissed.1 A joint status report 

shall be filed fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2015

 

1 The status conference will remain on calendar, because the mere 

representation that a case has been settled does not justify vacating a 

scheduling proceeding. Cf. Callie v. Near, 829 F.2d 888, 890 (9th Cir. 1987)

(indicating that a representation that claims have been settled does not 

necessarily establish the existence of a binding settlement agreement). 

Case 1:15-cv-00379-GEB-GSA Document 13 Filed 07/28/15 Page 2 of 2