Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04819/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04819-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF #1517267 v1 -1- 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT SAY SECURITY GROUP 

USA PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); [PROPOSED ORDER] 

RONALD F. LOPEZ, CA BAR NO. 111756, rflopez@thelen.com 

MARLENE WILLIAMS, CA BAR NO. 197107, mjwilliams@thelen.com 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3606 

Telephone: (415) 371–1200 

Facsimile: (415) 371–1211 

ROBERT E. KREBS (SBN 57526), rkrebs@thelen.com 

CHRISTOPHER L. OGDEN (SBN 235517), cogden@thelen.com 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

225 West San Carlos Street, Suite 1200 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Telephone: (408) 292–5800 

Facsimile: (408) 287–8040 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

EXTREME CCTV, INC. and 

FORWARD VISION CCTV LIMITED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EXTREME CCTV, INC., 

a foreign corporation, and 

FORWARD VISION CCTV LIMITED, a 

foreign corporation, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

SAY SECURITY GROUP USA, 

an Ohio limited liability company , 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: CV 07-04819 CW 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE AS TO 

DEFENDANT SAY SECURITY GROUP 

USA PURSUANT TO RULE 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii); [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FILED CONCURRENTLY 

The parties hereto, having amicably resolved their differences and having entered into a 

settlement agreement (docket #29), hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to defendant, 

/// 

/// 

Case 4:07-cv-04819-CW Document 32 Filed 07/08/08 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF #1517267 v1 -2- 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT SAY SECURITY GROUP 

USA PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); [PROPOSED ORDER] 

Say Security Group USA, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Fed. R. Civ. P. Each 

party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees. 

DATED: July 7, 2008 THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

By /s/ Ronald F. Lopez 

 Ronald F. Lopez 

 Counsel for Extreme CCTV, Inc. and 

 Forward Vision CCTV Limited 

DATED: July 7, 2008 McQUAID BEDFORD & VAN ZANDT LLP 

By /s/ Arman Javid 

 Arman Javid 

 Counsel for Say Security Group USA 

I, Ronald F. Lopez, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto. 

 /s/ Ronald F. Lopez 

 Ronald F. Lopez 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________, 2008 

The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

United States District Court Judge 

7/8

Case 4:07-cv-04819-CW Document 32 Filed 07/08/08 Page 2 of 2