Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01432/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01432-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID SOTO,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1432 LKK DAD P

vs.

EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 3, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Petitioner

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Pursuant to the magistrate judge’s

order, filed on August 30, 2005, respondents have filed a reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Based on the new evidence provided

by respondents in their reply, the findings and recommendations will not be adopted, the

Case 2:04-cv-01432-LKK -DAD Document 24 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

respondents’ motion to dismiss will be denied, and respondents will be ordered to file their

answer. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 3, 2005, are not adopted;

2. Respondents’ renewed motion to dismiss, filed on February 8, 2005, is denied;

and

3. Within sixty days from the service of this order, respondents shall file their

answer to petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

DATED: September 20, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/soto1432.805

Case 2:04-cv-01432-LKK -DAD Document 24 Filed 09/20/05 Page 2 of 2