Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03352/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03352-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL LEVIN, ET AL., 

Plaintiffs,

 v.

 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Defendant. /

No. 3:14-cv-03352-CRB

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO ENTERTAIN RULE 60(b)

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

JUDGMENT

Defendant the City and County of San Francisco moves for an order that the Court

will entertain a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from the Court’s

judgment of October 21, 2014 (the “Judgment”). Mot. (dkt. 104) at 1. In light of Plaintiffs’

Motion to Dismiss the Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction (Mootness) now pending in the Ninth

Circuit, see Opp’n (dkt. 107), Ex. B. (dkt. 107-2), the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion

without prejudice.

If the Ninth Circuit grants Plaintiffs’ motion and determines that the appeal is moot,

the Court will entertain a Rule 60(b) motion at a later date if the Ninth Circuit has not already

vacated the Judgment. See Cammermeyer v. Perry, 97 F.3d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir. 1996). The

Court may also revisit the case in any other way made appropriate by either the Ninth 

//

//

Case 3:14-cv-03352-CRB Document 109 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Circuit’s disposition of the pending appeal or by the future action of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 23, 2015 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-03352-CRB Document 109 Filed 07/23/15 Page 2 of 2