Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00856/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00856-54/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH BLACKWELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00856-AWI-SMS PC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SERVICE AT TWO ADDRESSES OF

RECORD

(Doc. 187)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

SERVE THIS ORDER ON PLAINTIFF IN LOS

ANGELES AS A ONE TIME COURTESY 

On January28, 2010, Plaintiff Keith Blackwell, a formerstate prisoner proceeding pro se and

in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, filed a motion seeking to have the Court and attorneys

for the defendants serve all documents on him at two addresses of record, one in Albuquerque, New

Mexico and one in Los Angeles, California. 

Plaintiff must keep the Court and attorneys for the defendants informed as to his current

address of record. Local Rule 183(b). There is no provision entitling Plaintiff to service at two

addresses of record, and Plaintiff has not shown good cause for this extraordinary request. 

Therefore, it is denied. If Plaintiff ’s current address of record is in Los Angeles, he must file a

notice so stating. Until and unless the Court receives such a notice, Plaintiff’s address of record 

///

1

Case 1:05-cv-00856-AWI -SMS Document 188 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

remains Albuquerque, New Mexico. The Court will, as a one time courtesy, direct the Clerk’s 1

Office to serve this order on Plaintiff at both addresses.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion seeking to have the Court and attorneys for the defendants serve

all documents on him at two addresses of record is DENIED; 

2. Plaintiff’s address of record remains Albuquerque, New Mexico unless Plaintiff files

a notice of change of address to the Los Angeles address; and

3. The Clerk’s Office shall, this one time only, serve a courtesy copy of this order on

Plaintiff at the Los Angeles address listed in document 187, in addition to service on

Plaintiff at his address of record in New Mexico.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On January 28, 2010, two orders and two findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff at his

1

address of record in New Mexico. (Docs. 183-186.) Service is deemed effective absent a notice of change of

address. Local Rule 183(b).

2

Case 1:05-cv-00856-AWI -SMS Document 188 Filed 01/29/10 Page 2 of 2