Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00268/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00268-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-00268-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND

DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE

TO OBEY A COURT ORDER AND

FAILURE TO STATE CLAIM

(Doc. 17)

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL COUNTS AS

A STRIKE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(G)

Plaintiff Robert Johnson (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On November 27, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within twenty days. To date,

Case 1:06-cv-00268-OWW -SMS Document 18 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of

this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the

record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 27,

2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for plaintiff’s

failure to obey the court’s order of October 5, 2006, and

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted; AND

3. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00268-OWW -SMS Document 18 Filed 01/29/07 Page 2 of 2