Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02118/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02118-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The Court issued this order based on Miller's pro se status and the parties' inability to meet and confer in good faith.

As Miller is now represented by counsel, the Court later reinstated the joint letter requirement. Doc. #373.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RALPH MILLER,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES, et

al,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 02-2118 MJJ (MEJ)

ORDER CLARIFYING JANUARY 6,

2006 ORDER VACATING JOINT

LETTER REQUIREMENT AND FOR

PARTIES TO RE-FILE ALL PENDING

DISCOVERY DISPUTES AS FORMAL

MOTIONS 

On January 6, 2006, the Court vacated the joint letter requirement for discovery disputes in

this case and ordered the parties to file motions pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7 for all disputes then

pending before it.1 Doc. #241. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further

Production of Documents and Responses to Interrogatories. Doc. #354. In his Reply in support of

his motion (Doc. #389), Miller states that the January 6 Order vacated the Court's earlier discovery

orders, and that earlier rulings on the parties' joint letter briefs are not dispositive of any issues now

before it. Reply at 6:2-5. The parties are hereby advised that any earlier rulings on the parties' joint

letter briefs remain in effect, including all deadlines established therein, and failure to comply

with said orders could result in the imposition of sanctions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 4, 2006 MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:02-cv-02118-MJJ Document 401 Filed 04/04/06 Page 1 of 1