Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00397/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00397-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONARD RANSOM, JR.,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

R. MARQUEZ, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:10-cv-00397-AWI-EPG-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF No. 124.)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 

SANDOVAL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT 

(ECF No. 110.)

ORDER ENTERING SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT

SANDOVAL

ORDER FOR THIS CASE TO PROCEED 

AGAINST DEFENDANTS AMADOR, 

NAVA, MARQUEZ, AND NUNEZ FOR 

USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE; AND 

AGAINST DEFENDANTS NAVA, 

MARQUEZ, AND YBARRA FOR 

FAILURE TO PROTECT PLAINTIFF 

Leonard Ransom (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On December 2, 2015, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 

defendant Sandoval’s motion for summary judgment be granted. (ECF No. 110.) The parties 

Case 1:10-cv-00397-AWI-EPG Document 126 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

were granted twenty days in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. 

(Id.) The twenty-day deadline has passed, and no objections have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 

analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

December 2, 2015, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendant Sandoval’s motion for summary judgment, filed on July 31, 2015, is 

GRANTED;

3. Summary judgment is entered in favor of defendant Sandoval; 

4. This case now proceeds against defendants Amador, Nava, Marquez, and Nunez 

for use of excessive force; and against defendants Nava, Marquez, and Ybarra 

for failure to protect Plaintiff; 

5. The Clerk is directed to reflect on the Court’s docket that the claims against 

defendant Sandoval are resolved; and

6. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 25, 2016 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00397-AWI-EPG Document 126 Filed 01/26/16 Page 2 of 2