Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02622/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02622-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LILLIANA SANCHEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CAPITAL CONTRACTORS INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 14-2622 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING CAPITAL

CONTRACTORS, INC. TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THIRD PARTY

COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

On today’s date, the Court approved the termination of the representation by

counsel of record for the Third Party Defendants in the above-titled action.

Given the circumstances under which said representation was initially brought to the

Court’s attention, it is not clear from the record that the Third Party Defendants have made

a voluntary appearance in the action, and the Court notes that they have never been

served with a summons and the Third Party Complaint.

Accordingly, the Third Party Complaint having been filed on June 27, 2014, Capital

Contractors, Inc. is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later than

October 16, 2015, why the Third Party Complaint should not dismissed pursuant to Rule

4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 2, 2015 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-02622-MMC Document 98 Filed 10/02/15 Page 1 of 1