Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05344/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05344-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CISCO SYSTEMS INC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARISTA NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-05344-BLF 

OMNIBUS ORDER REGARDING 

DAUBERT SEALING MOTIONS

[Re: ECF 419, 422, 426, 438, 462, 467, 470, 

475, 476, 491, 494, 498]

Before the Court are the parties’ administrative motions to file under seal portions of their 

briefing and exhibits in connection with the parties’ Daubert motions. ECF 419, 422, 426, 438, 

462, 467, 470, 475, 476, 491, 494, 498. For the reasons stated below, the motions are GRANTED 

IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

“Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records 

and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of 

Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 

U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). Consequently, access to motions and their attachments that are 

“more than tangentially related to the merits of a case” may be sealed only upon a showing of 

“compelling reasons” for sealing. Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 

1101–02 (9th Cir. 2016). Filings that are only tangentially related to the merits may be sealed 

upon a lesser showing of “good cause.” Id. at 1097. In addition, sealing motions filed in this 

district must be “narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material.” Civil L.R. 79-5(b). 

A party moving to seal a document in whole or in part must file a declaration establishing that the 

identified material is “sealable.” Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(A). “Reference to a stipulation or 

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 521 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 10
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

protective order that allows a party to designate certain documents as confidential is not sufficient 

to establish that a document, or portions thereof, are sealable.” Id.

II. DISCUSSION

The Court has reviewed the parties’ sealing motions and respective declarations in support 

thereof. The Court finds the parties have articulated compelling reasons to seal certain portions of 

most of the submitted documents. The proposed redactions are also narrowly tailored. The 

Court’s rulings on the sealing request are set forth in the tables below:

A. ECF 419

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Arista’s Motion to Strike 

Expert Opinions and 

Testimony of Dr. Kevin C. 

Almeroth

Cisco does not seek to seal the 

highlighted portions.

DENIED.

Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of 

Ryan Wong in Support of 

Arista’s Motion to Strike 

Expert Opinions and 

Testimony of Dr. Kevin C. 

Almeroth (“Wong Daubert

Declaration”) (Excerpts from 

the “Opening Expert Report of 

Kevin Almeroth Regarding 

Copy” dated June 3, 2016)

Paragraphs ¶¶ 83-86, 118, 119

and pages 437-661 (“Copying 

Exhibit 6”) contain 

information about Cisco’s 

source code.

Paragraphs ¶¶ 73, 74, 78, 79, 

112, 118, 138-142, 145, 147, 

148, 152, 153, 157, 195, 203, 

219 (and associated images on 

pages 107 through 115), 220, 

239-242, 246, 250-52, 257 and 

footnotes 99, 102 contain 

information of Arista’s

software and business 

strategies.

GRANTED as to Paragraphs 

¶¶ 83-86, 118, 119 and pages 

437-661; and ¶¶ 73, 74, 78, 79, 

112, 118, 138-142, 145, 147, 

148, 152, 153, 157, 195, 203, 

219 (and associated images on 

pages 107 through 115), 220, 

239-242, 246, 250-52, 257 and 

footnotes 99, 102; and 

DENIED as to remainder.

Exhibit 2 to the Wong Daubert

Declaration (Excerpts from the 

“Rebuttal Expert Report of 

Kevin Almeroth” dated June 

17, 2016)

Paragraphs ¶¶ 104, 134, 137, 

138, 142, 143, 144-47, 149, 

154 and footnotes 106, 112 

contain information of Arista’s

software, products, and 

business strategies, as well as 

discussion of a confidential 

ITC order.

GRANTED as to Paragraphs 

¶¶ 104, 134, 137, 138, 142, 

143, 144-47, 149, 154 and 

footnotes 106, 112; and 

DENIED as to remainder.

Exhibit 3 to the Wong Daubert

Declaration (Excerpts from the 

deposition of Dr. Kevin 

Testimony of Dr. Almeroth at 

145:22-24 contains 

information regarding Arista’s 

GRANTED as to 145:22-24, 

and 289:21-291:14; and 

DENIED as to remainder.

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 521 Filed 09/16/16 Page 2 of 10
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Almeroth) customer information. 

Testimony at 289:21-291:14, 

contains information about 

Cisco’s confidential 

technology. 

Exhibit 4 to the Wong Daubert

Declaration (Cisco’s 

Supplemental Objections and 

Responses to Defendant’s 

Interrogatory No. 20)

Contains information 

regarding Cisco’s technology 

and source code.

GRANTED.

B. ECF 422

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Arista’s Motion to Strike 

Expert Opinions and 

Testimony of Dr. Judith A. 

Chevalier

Page 2, lines 10-13; page 6, 

lines 10-26; page 7, lines 4-6 

contain information of

Arista’s marketing and sales 

strategies.

GRANTED as to 2:10-13, 

6:10-26, and 7:4-6; and 

DENIED as to remainder.

Exhibit A to the Declaration 

of Elizabeth k. McCloskey in 

Support of Arista’s Motion to 

Strike Expert Opinions and 

Testimony of Dr. Judith A. 

Chevalier

Information about Arista’s

and Cisco’s sales, customers, 

competitive strategies.

GRANTED.

Exhibit B to the Declaration 

of Elizabeth K. McCloskey in 

Support of Arista’s Motion to 

Strike Expert Opinions and 

Testimony of Dr. Judith A. 

Chevalier

Portions of the document 

from 154:1-157:17, 157:18-

166:19, 194:21-196:10 and 

218:8-18 contain information 

about Cisco’s sales strategies, 

competitive strategies and 

customers.

GRANTED as to 154:1-

157:17, 157:18-166:19, 

194:21-196:10 and 218:8-18;

and DENIED as to 

remainder.

Exhibit C to the Declaration 

of Elizabeth K. McCloskey in 

Support of Arista’s Motion to 

Strike Expert Opinions and 

Testimony of Dr. Judith A. 

Chevalier

Contains parties’ detailed 

confidential business 

information.

GRANTED.

Exhibit D to the Declaration 

of Elizabeth K. McCloskey in 

Support of Arista’s Motion to 

Strike Expert Opinions and 

Testimony of Dr. Judith A. 

Chevalier

Highlighted portions contain 

parties’ detailed confidential 

business information.

GRANTED.

Exhibit E to the Declaration 

of Elizabeth K. McCloskey in 

Support of Arista’s Motion to 

Strike Expert Opinions and 

Contains detailed parties’ 

confidential business 

information.

GRANTED.

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 521 Filed 09/16/16 Page 3 of 10
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Testimony of Dr. Judith A. 

Chevalier

Exhibit F to the Declaration 

of Elizabeth K. McCloskey in 

Support of Arista’s Motion to 

Strike Expert Opinions and 

Testimony of Dr. Judith A. 

Chevalier

Contains confidential 

business, product, and 

customer information. 

GRANTED.

C. ECF 426

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Cisco’s Motion to Exclude 

Expert Opinion Testimony 

From Arista’s Expert Dr. 

John Black

Arista does not seek to seal 

the highlighted portions.

DENIED.

Cisco’s Motion to Exclude 

Expert Opinion Testimony 

From Arista’s Expert William 

M. Seifert

Arista does not seek to seal 

the highlighted portions.

DENIED.

Cisco’s Motion to Exclude 

Expert Opinion Testimony 

From Arista’s Expert Cate M. 

Elsten

Pages 4, 5, 6:3, and 7:7 

contains Arista’s confidential 

business and sales 

information.

GRANTED as to pages 4, 5, 

6:3, and 7:7; and DENIED as 

to remainder.

Exhibit 1 to the Declaration 

of Andrew M. Holmes “Black 

Opening Report”

Paragraphs ¶¶ 120, 123-125, 

132, 161, 433, 438, 448-459, 

461-471, 478-482, 498, 500-

502, 504, 508, 510, 514, 515, 

570, 580, 636, 689-691, 696, 

700 and footnotes 32, 35, 40, 

and 128 contain information 

related to Cisco’s source 

code, third-party source code, 

as well as Cisco’s business 

information.

Paragraph 397 contains 

confidential information 

related to Arista EOS 

software. Paragraphs ¶¶ 519, 

525, and 678(i) contain 

information related to 

Arista’s source code. 

Paragraphs ¶¶ 375-377 

contain confidential 

information related to 

Juniper’s software.

GRANTED as to Paragraphs 

¶¶ 120, 123-125, 132, 161, 

375-377, 397, 433, 438, 448-

459, 461-471, 478-482, 498, 

500-502, 504, 508, 510, 514, 

515, 519, 525, 570, 580, 636, 

678(i), 689-691, 696, 700 and 

footnotes 32, 35, 40, and 128; 

and redacted portions on page 

141, 142, and 143 of Exhibit 

A to non-party Dell’s 

declaration, ECF 442; and 

DENIED as to remainder.

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 521 Filed 09/16/16 Page 4 of 10
5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Portions redacted on page 

141, 142, and 143 of Exhibit 

A to non-party Dell’s 

declaration, ECF 442, contain 

Dell’s confidential customer 

information.

Exhibit 2 to the Holmes 

Declaration “Black Rebuttal 

Report”

Paragraphs ¶¶ 50-51, 55, 148, 

155, 156, 159, 160, 165, and 

170 contain information 

related to Cisco’s source 

code, third-party source code, 

and confidential business 

information.

Paragraphs ¶¶ 148, 155, 156, 

160-166, and 169-171 contain 

confidential information 

related to Arista’s source 

code. 

GRANTED as to Paragraphs 

¶¶ 50-51, 55, 148, 155, 156, 

159, 160-166 and 169-171; 

and DENIED as to 

remainder.

Exhibit 4 to the Holmes 

Declaration

Arista does not seek to seal 

this exhibit, which contains

excerpts of Dr. Black’s 

deposition transcript.

DENIED.

Exhibit 5 to the Holmes 

Declaration “Seifert Report”

Paragraphs ¶¶ 90 (including 

footnote 78), 96 (including 

charts on Pages 43 and 44), 

97 (including footnote 88), 98 

(including footnotes 89–91), 

99 (including footnote 92), 

100(i), 100(ii) (including 

footnote 94), 100(iv) 

(including footnote 95), 

100(v) (including footnote 

97), 101, 103 (including 

footnote 106), 108, and 109 

contain Arista’s confidential 

sales and customer 

information.

Portions of paragraph 79 

contain confidential 

information of Juniper’s 

software and trade secrets.

GRANTED as to Paragraphs 

¶¶ 90 (including footnote 78), 

96 (including charts on Pages 

43 and 44), 97 (including 

footnote 88), 98 (including 

footnotes 89–91), 99 

(including footnote 92), 

100(i), 100(ii) (including 

footnote 94), 100(iv) 

(including footnote 95), 

100(v) (including footnote 

97), 101, 103 (including 

footnote 106), 108, and 109; 

and portions of ¶ 79 relating 

to Juniper’s software and 

trade secrets; and DENIED as 

to remainder.

Exhibit 6 to the Holmes 

Declaration

Pages 135-36 (13:42:25–

13:43:52) contain Arista’s

confidential business 

information.

GRANTED as to pages 135-

36 (13:42:25–13:43:52); and 

DENIED as to remainder.

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 521 Filed 09/16/16 Page 5 of 10
6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Exhibit 7 to the Holmes 

Declaration “Elsten June 3, 

2016 Report”

Pages 7, 9, 14, 15, 21-28, 32, 

and 33 contain Cisco’s 

confidential business 

information.

Pages 9, 17, 22-23 contain 

Arista’s confidential business, 

product and customer 

information.

GRANTED as to pages 7, 9, 

14, 15, 17, 21-28, 32 and 33; 

and DENIED as to 

remainder.

Exhibit 8 to the Holmes 

Declaration “Elsten Rebuttal 

Report”

Contains parties’ confidential 

business and customer 

information.

GRANTED.

Exhibit 9 to the Holmes 

Declaration

58:2-65:25 contain 

information related to Cisco’s 

customers and Cisco’s 

confidential business 

information.

Pages 58-60, 62–65, 81, and 

212-215 contain Arista’s 

confidential customer and 

business information. 

GRANTED as to 58:2-65:25; 

and pages 58-60, 62–65, 81, 

and 212-215; and DENIED 

as to remainder.

Exhibit 10 to the Holmes 

Declaration

Contains Cisco’s business 

information and competitive 

intelligence and related

strategies.

GRANTED.

Exhibit 12 to the Holmes 

Declaration “Clark June 3, 

2016 Report”

Paragraphs ¶¶ 170-191 

contain information related to 

Juniper’s software and trade 

secrets.

GRANTED as to ¶¶ 170-191; 

and DENIED as to 

remainder.

Exhibit 13 to the Holmes 

Declaration (Excerpts of the 

“Clark Rebuttal Report”)

Arista does not seek to seal 

these excerpts of Dr. Clark’s 

Rebuttal Report.

DENIED.

D. ECF 438

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Arista’s Corrected Motion to 

Strike Expert Opinions and 

Testimony of Dr. Kevin C. 

Almeroth

Cisco does not seek to seal the 

highlighted portions.

DENIED.

E. ECF 462

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Arista’s Opposition to Cisco’s 

Motion to Exclude Expert 

Opinion Testimony of Dr. John 

Highlighted text on page 8 at 

lines 25-26 contains Cisco’s 

confidential litigation 

GRANTED as to the 

highlighted text at 8:25-26; 

and DENIED as to remainder.

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 521 Filed 09/16/16 Page 6 of 10
7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Black settlement.

Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of 

Ryan Wong in Support of 

Arista’s Opposition to Exclude 

Expert Opinion Testimony of 

John Black (“Wong Opp. 

Declaration”) (Excerpts from 

the deposition transcript of Dr. 

Kevin C. Almeroth, taken on 

June 28, 2016)

Cisco does not seek to seal 

these excerpts of Dr. 

Almeroth’s deposition 

transcript.

DENIED.

Exhibit 5 to the Wong Opp. 

Declaration (Excerpts from the 

“Rebuttal Expert Report of 

Kevin Almeroth” dated June 

17, 2016)

Cisco does not seek to seal 

these excerpts of Dr. 

Almeroth’s Rebuttal Report.

DENIED.

F. ECF 467

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Arista’s Opposition to Cisco’s 

Motion to Exclude Expert 

Testimony from Arista’s 

Expert Cate M. Elsten

Highlighted portions contain 

Arista’s confidential business 

and product information.

Highlighted text on page 8 at 

lines 1-4 contains Cisco’s

confidential business 

information.

GRANTED.

Exhibit A to the Declaration of 

Eduardo E. Santacana in 

Support of Arista’s Opposition 

to Cisco’s Motion to Exclude 

Expert Testimony from 

Arista’s Expert Cate M. Elsten

Cisco does not seek to seal this 

exhibit, which contains

excerpts of Dr. Chevalier’s 

deposition transcript.

DENIED.

G. ECF 470

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Arista Network Inc.’s 

Opposition to Cisco’s Motion 

to Exclude Expert Opinion 

Testimony of William M. 

Seifert 

Cisco did not file a declaration 

in support of sealing the 

highlighted portions of this 

exhibit that cite to Mr. 

Seifert’s deposition transcript. 

DENIED.

Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of 

Andrea Nill Sanchez in 

Support of Arista Network 

Inc.’s Opposition to Cisco 

Systems, Inc.’s Motion to 

Exclude Opinion Testimony of 

William M. Seifert (“Exhibit 

1”)

Cisco did not file a declaration 

in support of sealing this 

exhibit, which contains 

excerpts of Mr. Seifert’s 

deposition transcript. 

DENIED.

Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Excerpts from the Expert GRANTED.

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 521 Filed 09/16/16 Page 7 of 10
8

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Andrea Nill Sanchez in 

Support of Arista Network 

Inc.’s Opposition to Cisco 

Systems, Inc.’s Motion to 

Exclude Opinion Testimony of 

William M. Seifert (“Exhibit 

4”) 

Report of Judith A. Chevalier 

(submitted on June 24, 2016) 

contain Arista’s confidential 

business information, such as 

marketing and sales strategies. 

Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of 

Andrea Nill Sanchez in 

Support of Arista Network 

Inc.’s Opposition to Cisco 

Systems, Inc.’s Motion to 

Exclude Opinion Testimony of 

William M. Seifert (“Exhibit 

5”) 

Excerpts from the Rebuttal 

Expert Report on Fair Use of 

Judith A. Chevalier (submitted 

on June 17, 2016) contain 

Arista’s confidential customer 

and product information.

GRANTED.

H. ECF 475

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Cisco’s Opposition to

Arista’s Corrected Motion

to Strike Expert Opinions

and Testimony of Dr.

Kevin C. Almeroth.

Highlighted text on page 4 at 

lines 7-13 and 16-20, page 7 at 

lines 26-28, page 8 at line 1, 

page 9 at lines 24-26, page 10 

at lines 18-20 contains Arista’s 

confidential product and 

customer information.

GRANTED as to highlighted 

text at 4:7-13, 4:16-20; 7:26-

28; 8:1; 9:24-26; 10:18-20; and 

DENIED as to remainder.

Exhibit 1 to the

Declaration of John M.

Neukom in Support of

Cisco’s Opposition to

Arista’s Corrected Motion

to Strike Expert Opinions

and Testimony of Dr.

Kevin C. Almeroth.

(“Neukom Declaration”)

Paragraphs ¶¶ 72-74 (including 

the image shown on Page 29) 

contains Arista’s confidential 

product and business 

information.

Granted as to paragraphs ¶¶ 

72-74, including the image on 

page 29; and DENIED as to 

remainder.

Exhibit 2 to the Neukom

Declaration

Arista does not seek to file 

under seal this exhibit, which 

contains excerpts of Dr. 

Almeroth’s deposition 

transcript.

DENIED.

Exhibit 3 to the Neukom

Declaration

Arista does not seek to file 

under seal this exhibit, which 

contains excerpts of Dr. 

Black’s deposition transcript.

DENIED.

I. ECF 476

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Cisco’s Opposition to Highlighted text on page 1 at GRANTED as to 1:24-26; 8:9-

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 521 Filed 09/16/16 Page 8 of 10
9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Arista’s Motion to Exclude

Expert Opinion Testimony

From Dr. Judith A.

Chevalier

lines 24-26, page 8 at lines 9-

13 and footnote 3, page 9 at 

lines 6-26, page 10 at lines 3-

24 contains Arista’s 

confidential product, customer, 

and business information.

13 & n.3; 9:6-26; 10:3-24; and 

DENIED as to remainder.

Exhibit 1 to the

Declaration of Sara E.

Jenkins in Support of

Cisco’s Opposition to

Arista’s Motion to Exclude

Expert Opinion Testimony

From Dr. Judith A.

Chevalier

Excerpts from Anshul 

Sadana’s deposition transcript 

contain Arista’s confidential 

customer and product 

information.

GRANTED.

J. ECF 491

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Defendant Arista Networks, 

Inc.’s Reply in Support of its 

Motion to Strike Expert 

Opinions and Testimony of Dr. 

Judith A. Chevalier

Highlighted portions contain 

Arista’s confidential software 

and business information.

Cisco did not file a declaration 

in support of sealing the 

highlighted text at 1:13-14.

GRANTED as to highlighted 

portions at 1:20, 24; 4:3-4; 5:9-

11; and DENIED as to 1:13-

14.

K. ECF 494

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Defendant Arista Networks, 

Inc.’s Reply in Support of its 

Motion to Strike Expert 

Opinions and Testimony of Dr. 

Kevin C. Almeroth 

Highlighted portions on page 5 

at lines 7-11 and line 17

contain Arista’s confidential 

software, sales, and product 

information. 

Cisco did not file a declaration 

in support of sealing the 

remaining highlighted 

portions.

GRANTED as to the 

highlighted portions at 5:7-11 

and 17; and DENIED as to 

remainder.

L. ECF 498

Identification of Documents 

to be Sealed

Description of Documents Court’s Order

Cisco’s Reply in Support

of Its Motion to Exclude

Expert Opinion Testimony

From Arista’s Expert Dr.

John Black

Arista did not file a declaration 

in support of sealing this 

exhibit.

DENIED.

Cisco’s Reply in Support Arista did not file a declaration DENIED.

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 521 Filed 09/16/16 Page 9 of 10
10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

of Its Motion to Exclude

Expert Opinion Testimony

From Arista’s Expert

William M. Seifert

in support of sealing this 

exhibit.

Cisco’s Reply in Support

of Its Motion to Exclude

Expert Opinion Testimony

From Arista’s Expert Cate

M. Elsten

Highlighted portions contain 

Arista’s confidential product, 

sales, and customer 

information.

GRANTED.

III. ORDER

For the foregoing reasons, the sealing motions at ECF 419, 422, 426, 438, 462, 467, 470, 

475, 476, 491, 494, 498 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Under Civil Local 

Rule 79-5(e)(2), for any request that has been denied because the party designating a document as 

confidential or subject to a protective order has not provided sufficient reasons to seal, the 

submitting party must file the unredacted (or lesser redacted) documents into the public record no 

earlier than 4 days and no later than 10 days form the filing of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 16, 2016

 ______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 521 Filed 09/16/16 Page 10 of 10