Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02071/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02071-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION UNSEALING, IN PART, THE DEPOSITION OF FRANCOIS MARLAND 

Case No. C 06-2071 VRW 

386055.01 

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065 (rvannest@kvn.com) 

WENDY J. THURM - #163558 (wthurm@kvn.com) 

BENEDICT Y. HUR - #224018 (bhur@kvn.com) 

STEVEN K. YODA - #237739 (syoda@kvn.com) 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, and 

Counter-Counter-Claimant 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

 fka THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER LLP, fka THELEN REID & 

PRIEST LLP, 

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

v. 

FRANÇOIS MARLAND, 

Defendant and Counter-Claimant. 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER LLP, fka THELEN REID & 

PRIEST LLP, 

Counter-Counter-Claimant, 

v. 

FRANÇOIS MARLAND and SUSANNAH 

MAAS, 

Counter-Counter-Defendants. 

Case No. C 06-2071 VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER UNSEALING, IN PART, THE 

DEPOSITION OF FRANCOIS MARLAND

Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 83 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 88 Filed 12/18/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIPULATION UNSEALING, IN PART, THE DEPOSITION OF FRANCOIS MARLAND 

Case No. C 06-2071 VRW 

386055.01 

Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, and Counter-Counter-Claimant Thelen Reid Brown 

Raysman & Steiner LLP (formerly known as Thelen Reid & Priest LLP) (“Thelen”) and 

Defendant, Counter-Claimant, and Counter-Counter-Defendant Francois Marland (“Marland”) 

hereby stipulate to the following under Civil Local Rules 7-1(a)(5) and 7-12: 

 WHEREAS, on November 21, 2006, the Court issued a Minute Order stating, in part: (1) 

at his deposition scheduled for November 29 and 30, 2006, Francois Marland could not “assert 

the attorney-client privilege with regard to communications between Marland and [Philippe] 

Brunswick and communications between Marland and [Francois] Chateau; and (2) the deposition 

transcript would be sealed (Docket No. 71); 

 WHEREAS, on November 29 and 30, 2006, counsel for Thelen conducted the deposition 

of Marland; 

 WHEREAS, counsel for Thelen and counsel for Marland each have reviewed the 

transcript of the November 29 and 30, 2006 deposition of Francois Marland, and have met and 

conferred in an attempt to reach agreement on Thelen’s request to unseal the transcript of 

Marland’s deposition; 

 THEREFORE, the Thelen and Maas hereby stipulate that: 

(1) Volume 1 of the deposition of Francois Marland shall be unsealed, except for the 

portion of Volume 1 between page 88, line 11 and page 98, line 19; 

(2) Volume 2 of the deposition of Francois Marland shall be unsealed, except for the 

portion of Volume 2 between page 283, line 14 and page 295, line 10; 

(3) Nothing contained herein shall be deemed a waiver of any party’s rights to enter 

into and file additional stipulations regarding the portions of the Marland deposition transcript 

that shall remain sealed under the terms of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. Nothing 

contained herein shall be deemed a waiver of any party’s rights to seek relief from the Court with 

respect to the portions of the Marland deposition that shall remain sealed under the terms of this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to be a waiver of 

any party’s rights regarding any matter other than the sealing of Marland’s deposition transcript, 

Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 83 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 88 Filed 12/18/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION UNSEALING, IN PART, THE DEPOSITION OF FRANCOIS MARLAND 

Case No. C 06-2071 VRW 

386055.01 

and the testimony provided by Marland, in those portions of the deposition that shall remain 

sealed under the terms of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: December 13, 2006 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ Wendy J. Thurm 

WENDY J. THURM 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, 

and Counter-Counter-Claimant 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER LLP, fka THELEN REID & 

PRIEST LLP. 

Dated: December 13, 2006 HAYES & HARDY LLP 

CARLSON, CALLADINE & PETERSON 

LLP 

By: /s/ Andrew W. Hayes 

ANDREW W. HAYES 

Attorneys for Defendant, CounterClaimant, and Counter-Counter-Defendant

FRANCOIS MARLAND 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

HON. VAUGHN R. WALKER 

Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 83 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 3 of 3

December 18, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 88 Filed 12/18/06 Page 3 of 3