Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01624/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01624-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIMAS O’CAMPO,

Plaintiff,

v.

RAGHBIR SINGH GHOMAN, dba 

QUICK SHOP 2; GHOMAN’S 

PROPERTIES, LLC,

Defendants.

No. 2:08-cv-1624 KJM DB PS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On May 19, 2016, an order issued granting plaintiff leave to file a second amended 

complaint and deeming the second amended complaint filed March 21, 2016, the operative 

complaint. (ECF No. 82.) On June 30, 2016, plaintiff filed a declaration attesting to plaintiff’s 

efforts to serve the second amended complaint on the defendants. (ECF No. 84.) 

On November 30, 2016, the undersigned issued an order to show cause ordering plaintiff 

to “show cause in writing within twenty-one (21) days” as to why this action should not be 

dismissed for a lack or prosecution. (ECF No. 87.) On December 19, 2016, plaintiff filed an 

application for the Clerk to enter defendants’ default. (ECF No. 88.) The Clerk entered 

defendants’ default on December 20, 2016. (ECF No. 89.)

Plaintiff, however, has not responded to the November 30, 2016, order to show cause. In 

this regard, the November 30, 2016 order explicitly ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing 

Case 2:08-cv-01624-KJM-DB Document 90 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

within twenty-one days. Filing an application for the entry of defendants’ default was not a 

permitted response. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause in writing within 

seven (7) days of the date of this order as to why this action should not be dismissed for a lack of 

prosecution and why plaintiff’s counsel should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with the 

November 30, 2016 order to show cause.

1

Dated: January 11, 2017

DLB:6

DB\orders\orders.pro se\o’campo1624.osc2.dlop

 

1

 Alternatively, plaintiff may comply with this order by filing a notice of voluntary dismissal 

pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Case 2:08-cv-01624-KJM-DB Document 90 Filed 01/12/17 Page 2 of 2