Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01397/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01397-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

- 1 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILIP A. MCLEOD, CASB 101101 

NATHAN JASKOWIAK, CASB 248007 

KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN 

450 Pacific Avenue 

San Francisco, California 94133 

Telephone: (415)398-6000 

Facsimile: (415)981-0136 

-andGREGORY M. SUDBURY 

Admitted Pro Hac 

KODIE P. BENNION 

Admitted Pro Hac 

QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS, 

WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C. 

2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone: (214) 880-1878 

Facsimile: (214) 871-2111 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 

JONATHAN M. JENKINS, CASB 193011 

LARA T. KAYAYAN, CASB 239384 

JENKINS KAYAYAN LLP 

444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1750 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (310) 984-6800 

Facsimile: (310-984-6840 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE 

COMPANY, INC., 

Defendant. 

No. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

 

Case 2:13-cv-01397-JAM-KJN Document 151 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 2 

 The Court, having considered Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, 

N.A. (JPMC or Plaintiff) and Defendant Sierra Pacific Mortgage 

Company, Inc.’s (Sierra or Defendant) Joint Stipulation of 

Dismissal with Prejudice, hereby grants same. 

 It is therefore ORDERED that all claims which were asserted 

between Plaintiff and Defendant related to the Loans identified 

as 1 through 4, 6, 7, and 9 through 14 in Exhibit B to the 

Complaint (Dkt No. 1) in this civil action are hereby dismissed 

with prejudice. Because the Loans identified as 5, 8, 15, 16 and 

18 in Exhibit B to the Complaint were previously dismissed with 

prejudice and the Loan identified as 17 in Exhibit B of the 

Complaint was previously dismissed without prejudice (Dkt No. 

77), this stipulation dismisses all remaining claims pending in 

this civil action. 

 All relief not granted herein is denied, such that this 

Order of Dismissal with Prejudice fully resolves all claims by 

the parties in this civil action and constitutes final judgment. 

 SO ORDERED. 

 SIGNED this the 6th day of May, 2016. 

/s/ John A. Mendez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

4813-2693-6369, v. 2 

Case 2:13-cv-01397-JAM-KJN Document 151 Filed 05/09/16 Page 2 of 2