Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00740/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00740-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

County Counsel

Tulare County

Visalia, California

Raymond P. Boucher 

Brian M. Bush 

BOUCHER, LLP 

Herman Moreno 

LAW OFFICES OF HERMEZ MORENO, PC 

21600 Oxnard Street, Suite 600 

Woodland Hills, CA 91367 

Telephone: (818) 340-5400 

Facsimile: (818) 340-5401 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

KATHLEEN BALES-LANGE, #094765 

County Counsel for the County of Tulare 

Judith D. Chapman, #169479 

Deputy County Counsel 

2900 West Burrel, County Civic Center 

Visalia, California 93291 

Telephone: (559) 733-6263 

Facsimile: (559) 737-4319 

Attorneys for Defendant County of Tulare 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO 

CARLOS CARRASQUILLA, ALBA LYDA 

CARRASQUILLA, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

TULARE COUNTY, DOES 1-10, Inclusive 

 Defendants. 

Case Number: 1:15-cv-00740-BAM 

PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION 

AND ORDER TO CONTINUE 

THE MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

HEARING DATE AND EXTEND 

TIME FOR FILING OF 

RESPONSE TO THE 

COMPLAINT 

Date: September 22, 2015 

Time: 8:30 a.m. 

Courtroom: 8 

Barbara A. McAuliffe 

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

JOINT STIPULATION 

Case 1:15-cv-00740-BAM Document 7 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

County Counsel

Tulare County

Visalia, California

Plaintiffs, CARLOS CARRASQUILLA and ALBA LYDA CARRASQUILLA by and 

through their attorneys of record and Defendant, TULARE COUNTY, by and through Tulare 

County Counsel, Deputy County Counsel, Judith D. Chapman, stipulate as follows: 

 WHEREAS Defendant was served with the Summons and Complaint on August 27, 2015 

and needs time to gather information regarding the Plaintiffs’ claims. In order to meaningfully 

participate in the meet and confer and the scheduling conference and to prepare a proper response to 

the Complaint; 

 WHEREAS the parties are required pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. (26(f), meet and confer at 

least twenty-one (21) days prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, the parties agree that 

counsel for Defendant will be able to meaningfully participate in the conference after she has had 

time to review the case documents and information. 

 THEREFORE the parties respectfully request that the time to file a response to the 

Complaint be extended for 15 days and Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for 

September 22, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. be continued for a period of 30 days. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED BY THE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND NAMED HEREIN. 

Dated: 9-11-2015 LAW OFFICE OF HERMEZ MORENO, PC 

 _____/s/___________________ 

 Hermez Moreno, Attorney for 

 Plaintiffs 

 

Dated: 09-11-2015 KATHLEEN BALES-LANGE 

 County Counsel 

 _____/s/_____________________ 

 Judith D. Chapman, Attorney for 

 Defendant County of Tulare 

 

Case 1:15-cv-00740-BAM Document 7 Filed 09/17/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

County Counsel

Tulare County

Visalia, California

ORDER 

Based on the parties’ Stipulation to extend time to file the responsive pleading and Continue 

Mandatory Scheduling Conference, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The 

Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this matter, currently set for September 22, 2015, is vacated 

and continued to October 27, 2015, at 09:00 a.m., in Department 8 before Judge McAuliffe. 

Further, the responsive pleading is now due on or before October 1, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 17, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:15-cv-00740-BAM Document 7 Filed 09/17/15 Page 3 of 3