Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03124/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03124-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PARKLYN BAY COMPANY, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,

et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-13-3124 EMC

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ORDER

In its reply brief in support of its pending motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff Parklyn

Bay Company argues that Defendants had a duty to defend based on the allegations at Paragraph 18

of the complaint in the underlying Duncan action. See Docket No. 61 (Reply Br.) at 9-10; see also

Docket No. 58-2 at 27 (Duncan Complaint) at ¶ 18 (“During the time plaintiffs were out of their

unit, defendants and/or workers employed by defendants made multiple entries into the Premises

without prior notice, and without the consent of plaintiffs.”). The Defendants are hereby

ORDERED to file a supplemental brief, not to exceed five (5) pages in length, responding to

Plaintiff’s argument that the allegations in Paragraph 18 triggered the Defendants’ duty to defend. 

Such supplemental brief shall be filed no later than 9 a.m. PDT on Tuesday, July 28, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 24, 2015

_________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-03124-EMC Document 62 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 1