Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01438/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01438-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Cynthia L. Rice (SBN 87630)

Verónica Meléndez (SBN 294106)

Ezra Kautz (SBN 330352)

Chelsea Lalancette (SBN 330207)

CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION

2210 K Street, #201

Sacramento, CA 95816

Tel: (916) 446 7905

Fax: (916) 446 3057

cricecrlaf@comcast.net

vmelendez@crlaf.org

ekautz@crlaf.org

chelseal@crlaf.org

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The Court having reviewed Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended 

MARIA DOE, a fictitious name; CLARA 

DOE, a fictitious name; and “I.D.,” a 

fictitious name, by and through her next 

friend, MARIA DOE;

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

OFFICE; DARRYL RODERICK; 

JAGDEEP SINGH; SUSHMA GIRI; and 

ALIDA ESTRADA,

Defendants. 

Case No.: 2:21-cv-01438-MCE-CKD

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 

LEAVE TO FILE SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

Case 2:21-cv-01438-DC-CKD Document 31 Filed 04/13/22 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Complaint (ECF No. 26), the proposed complaint filed with the Motion (“Proposed 

Second Amended Complaint”), the Statements of Conditional Non-Opposition and 

Non-Opposition filed on behalf of Defendants (ECF No. 29 and 30, respectively), and it 

satisfactorily appearing to the Court that good cause has been shown, 

Plaintiffs may file the Proposed Second Amended Complaint not later than ten 

(10) days following the date this Order is electronically filed. Given Plaintiffs’ 

representation that the subject matter of said Proposed Second Amended Complaint “is 

unrelated to the substance of the pending motion to dismiss” (ECF No. 26, 2:10-11), the 

Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of Defendants County of Sacramento, et al. (ECF No. 

17) remains pending and will be deemed to apply to the Second Amended Complaint 

when filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12, 2022

Case 2:21-cv-01438-DC-CKD Document 31 Filed 04/13/22 Page 2 of 2