Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00187/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00187-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

f HFREBY CERTIFY that the above and 

foregoing is a true and correct copy of 

the original on file in my office. 

ATTEST 

WILLIAM T. WALSH, Clerk 

United States Dis rict Court 

District of New rsey 

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL 

on 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION 

IN RE: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) 

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -1) 

MDL No. 2687 

On February 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 4 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for 

the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been 

transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been 

assigned to the Honorable Jose L Linares. 

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are 

common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge 

Linares. 

Pursuant to Rule 7 .1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrigt 

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the 

District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of February 4, 2016, and, with the consent 

of that court, assigned to the Honorable Jose L Linares. 

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States 

District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be 

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the 

Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. 

Inasmuch as no objection is 

pending at this time, the 

stay is lifted. 

I Feb 16, 2016 j 

CLERK'S OFFICE UNITED STATES 

JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION 

FOR THE PANEL: 

~ Jeffery N. Luthi 

Clerk of the Panel 

Case 2:16-cv-00187-KJM-EFB Document 6 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 3
IN RE: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 2687 

SCHEDULE CT0-1 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS 

C.A.NO. 

CALIFORNIA EASTERN 

CAE 2 16-00187 

LOUISIANA WESTERN 

LAW 1 15-02840 

MINNESOTA 

MN 0 15-04350 

MN 0 15-04434 

MN 0 15-04435 

MN 0 15-04438 

MN 0 15-04498 

MN 0 15-04582 

MN 0 16-00091 

MN 0 16-00171 

MN 0 16-00176 

PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN 

PAE 2 15-06564 

PAE 2 15-06638 

PAE 2 15-06799 

PAE 2 16-00170 

PAE 2 16-00319 

WASHINGTON EASTERN 

CASE CAPTION 

City of Sacramento v. General Chemical Corporation et 

al 

City of Alexandria v. Reichl et al 

Water, Light, Power and Building Commission of the 

City of East Grand Forks, Minnesota v. Hawkins, Inc. et 

al 

City of Minneapolis v. Reichl et al 

City of Duluth, Minnesota v. Reichl et al 

TeeMark Corporation v. Reichl et al 

Mobile Area Water and Sewer System v. Hawkins, Inc. 

et al 

Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint 

Paul, Minnesota v. Reichl et al 

City of St. Cloud, Minnesota v. Reichl et al 

City of Grand Marais v. Reichl et al 

City of Fergus Falls et al v. Reichl et al 

LITTLE RIVER COUNTY R.D.A. WATER SYSTEM 

v. REICHL et al 

CITY OF EAST MOLINE v. REICHL et al 

EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT v. REICHL et al 

MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF WESTMORELAND 

COUNTY v. REICHL et al 

CITY OF MATTOON v. REICHL et al 

Case 2:16-cv-00187-KJM-EFB Document 6 Filed 02/17/16 Page 2 of 3
WAE 2 16-00010 City of Spokane v. General Chemical Corporation et al 

WASHING TON WESTERN 

WAW 3 16-05057 City of Tacoma v. General Chemical Corporation et al 

Case 2:16-cv-00187-KJM-EFB Document 6 Filed 02/17/16 Page 3 of 3