Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20718/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20718-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

1

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GARY KREMEN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

STEPHEN MICHAEL COHEN, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 98-20718 JW (PVT)

INTERIM ORDER DENYING

DEFENDANT COHEN’S REQUESTS FOR

SANCTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

RE-SCHEDULING REMAINDER OF

DEFENDANT COHEN’S MOTION TO

QUASH AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;

AND STAYING SUBPOENA

On May 21, 2007, Defendant Cohen filed a motion seeking an order quashing a

subpoena, a protective order and an order for sanctions. Having reviewed the papers submitted, 1

the court finds it appropriate to issue this interim order. Based on the moving papers and the file

herein, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the requests for sanctions contained in Defendant

Cohen’s aforementioned motion is DENIED, without prejudice to motions brought separately, as

required by Civil Local Rule 7-8(a). This is the second time the court has notified Defendant of

the requirements of Local Rule 7-8(a). Any future request for discovery sanctions by Defendant

which is not brought separately as required by Local Rule 7-8(a) will be denied with prejudice.

Case 5:98-cv-20718-JW Document 1280 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on Defendant Cohen’s motion to quash and

for protective order is hereby re-scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on June 26, 2007 in courtroom 5 of this

court. (Magistrate Judge Trumbull’s law and motion calendar is held on Tuesdays at 10:00 a.m. 

Thus, any future discovery motions should be noticed for a Tuesday at 10:00 a.m.) If Defendant

Cohen or any attorney of record who will be appearing at the hearing has a scheduling conflict

with this hearing date, he or she shall promptly file either a stipulation or motion under Civil

Local Rule 6-3 requesting another hearing date.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending resolution of this motion, the subpoena

Plaintiff’s counsel issued to the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services is STAYED. 

Plaintiff’s counsel shall promptly notify this non-party that the subpoenas are stayed, and in the

event the non-party nonetheless produces documents, neither Plaintiff nor his counsel shall read

or review any of the documents absent further order of the court.

Dated: 5/22/07

_________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:98-cv-20718-JW Document 1280 Filed 05/22/07 Page 2 of 2