Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-06959/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-06959-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

No. 4:16-CV-06959-HSG: STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADA SCHEDULING ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

MICHAEL J. HADDAD (SBN 189114)

JULIA SHERWIN (SBN 189268) 

T. KENNEDY HELM (SBN 282319) 

MAYA SORENSEN (SBN 250722) 

HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP 

505 Seventeenth Street 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 452-5500 

Facsimile: (510) 452-5510 

SANJAY S. SCHMIDT (SBN 247475) 

LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 

1388 Sutter Street, Suite 810 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

Telephone: (415) 563-8583 

Facsimile: (415) 223-9717 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JEREMY LAPACHET, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL 

GROUP, INC., TAYLOR FITHIAN, M.D., 

LANI ANTONIO, P.A., VERONICA 

BERGHORST, R.N., JESSAMAE 

TRINIDAD, R.N., GRASHIKA DEVENDRA, 

Psychiatric R.N., TABITHA KING, L.V.N., 

AMARDEEP TAWANA, L.V.N., JUDITH 

ALEJANDRE, L.V.N. COUNTY OF 

STANISLAUS, a municipal corporation, 

Stanislaus County Sheriff ADAM 

CHRISTIANSON, and DOES 1-50, Jointly 

and Severally, 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 4:16-cv-06959-HSG 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 

AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER FOR 

CASE ASSERTING DENIAL OF RIGHT 

OF ACCESS UNDER AMERICANS WITH 

DISABILITIES ACT TITLE II & III (Dkt. 

4) 

Case 4:16-cv-06959-HSG Document 32 Filed 03/14/17 Page 1 of 4
No. 4:16-CV-06959-HSG: STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADA SCHEDULING ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

STIPULATION 

The parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby respectfully 

stipulate and agree as follows: 

1. Whereas, on December 6, 2016, a “Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right 

of Access Under Americans With Disabilities Act Title II & III (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-89)” 

(hereafter “Scheduling Order”) was issued in the instant action, Dkt. 4, presumably due to 

the inclusion of claims under Title II and Title III of the ADA in the Fifth Cause of Action 

of the Complaint. Dkt. 1 at 42:9-45:9. 

2. The Scheduling Order sets forth a series of successive dates. See Dkt. 4 at 1:24-2:8. 

3. Although there are Title II and III claims at issue in the instant case, the crux of these 

claims is different than more common ADA claims, which expressly and exclusively 

concern the physical condition of property. The claims here concern acts and omissions, as 

set forth more fully in the Complaint. Dkt. 1 at 42:9-45:9. 

4. Due to law and motion matters currently pending in this case, the parties all agree that it 

would be premature and inefficient to hold a joint inspection at this early stage. 

5. Based on the foregoing circumstances, the parties hereby jointly request that the Court 

extend all of the dates set forth in the current Scheduling Order by three months, which 

would extend the current deadline of March 17, 2017 for the parties and counsel to hold 

the joint inspection of premises to June 9, 2017. All of the other deadlines that are tied to 

the March 17, 2017 deadline would be correspondingly extended. 

6. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that this Court enter the Order 

below, amending the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 4) as follows: 

The current deadline of March 17, 2017 for the parties and counsel to hold a joint 

inspection of the premises shall be extended to June 9, 2017, and all preceding and 

subsequent deadlines that are tied to this deadline shall be correspondingly extended.

Case 4:16-cv-06959-HSG Document 32 Filed 03/14/17 Page 2 of 4
No. 4:16-CV-06959-HSG: STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADA SCHEDULING ORDER 

 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: March 14, 2017 LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 

 

 /s/ Sanjay S. Schmidt 

 SANJAY S. SCHMIDT 

 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 

 JEREMY LAPACHET 

Dated: March 14, 2017 BERTLING & CLAUSEN, LLP 

 /s/ Jemma Saunders* 

 JEMMA SAUNDERS 

 Attorneys for Defendants CFMG, Fithian, Antonio, 

 Berghorst, Trinidad, Devendra, King, Tawana, Alejandre 

Dated: March 14, 2017 RIVERA & ASSOCIATES 

 /s/ Jesse Manuel Rivera*

 JESSE MANUEL RIVERA 

 Attorneys for Defendants County of Stanislaus, Sheriff 

 Adam Christianson 

*Ms. Saunders and Mr. Rivera give their consent to file this stipulation with their 

electronic signatures. 

 

Case 4:16-cv-06959-HSG Document 32 Filed 03/14/17 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

No. 4:16-C

 

2

4

6

7

9

0

2

4

6

7

9

0

2

4

P

THEREF

follows: 

inspectio

deadlines

 IT

Dated: M

 

 

CV-06959-HSG

URSUANT 

FOR, IT IS S

The current 

on of the prem

s that are tied

T IS SO ORD

March 14, 20

G: STIPULATI

 

TO THE ST

SO ORDERE

deadline of 

mises shall b

d to this dea

DERED. 

017 

 

 

ION & [PROP

O

TIPULATIO

ED. The Sch

March 17, 2

be extended 

adline shall b

POSED] ORDE

ORDER

ON ABOVE,

heduling Ord

2017 for the 

to June 9, 20

be correspon

__________

Hon. Hayw

UNITED ST

ER RE: ADA S

4

, AND GOO

der (Dkt. 4) 

parties and c

017, and all 

ndingly exten

__________

wood S. Gillia

TATES DIS

SCHEDULING

4

OD CAUSE 

shall be ame

counsel to h

preceding a

nded. 

___________

am, Jr. 

STRICT COU

G ORDER 

APPEARIN

ended as 

old a joint 

and subseque

___ 

URT 

NG 

ent 

Case 4:16-cv-06959-HSG Document 32 Filed 03/14/17 Page 4 of 4