Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-02498/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-02498-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODNEY LEE BIGLER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

OFFICER DANIEL FORBUS, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-02498 SBA (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the present pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On April 21, 2010, mail directed to Plaintiff by the Court was returned to the Clerk of the Court with

a notation that it was undeliverable because they were unable to find Plaintiff. To date, Plaintiff has

not updated his address with the Court or submitted any further pleadings in this case.

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11 a party proceeding pro se whose address

changes while an action is pending must promptly file a notice of change of address specifying the

new address. See L.R. 3-11(a). The court may, without prejudice, dismiss a complaint when:

(1) mail directed to the pro se party by the court has been returned to the court as not deliverable,

and (2) the court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written communication from the

pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b). 

More than sixty days have passed since the mail directed to Plaintiff by the Court was

returned as undeliverable. The Court has not received a notice from Plaintiff of a new address. 

Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the Northern

District Local Rules. The Court has rendered its final decision on this matter, therefore, this Order

TERMINATES Plaintiff's case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 6/22/10 

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge

Case 4:09-cv-02498-SBA Document 19 Filed 06/24/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.09\Bigler2498.Dismiss-3-11.wpd 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODEY LEE BIGLER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DEANIEL FORBUS et al,

Defendant. /

Case Number: CV09-02498 SBA 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District

Court, Northern District of California.

That on June 24, 2010, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said

copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said

envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle

located in the Clerk's office.

Rodney Lee Bigler

1010 Emerline Avenue

Building C

Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Dated: June 24, 2010

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk

Case 4:09-cv-02498-SBA Document 19 Filed 06/24/10 Page 2 of 2