Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-01701/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-01701-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL RAY JACKSON,

Petitioner,

Case No. 12cv1701-DMS (NLS)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION,

DISMISSING PETITION, AND

DENYING REQUEST FOR

CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

vs.

KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden,

Respondent.

Petitioner Carl Ray Jackson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 challenging his conviction and sentence for premeditated

attempted murder and assault with a semi-automatic firearm. The petition was referred to United

States Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

Section 636(b)(1)(B) and Civil Local Rule 72.1(d). Respondent filed an answer and Petitioner filed

a traverse and a request for a certificate of appealability. On January 18, 2013, the Magistrate Judge

issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending to deny the petition.

Petitioner timely objected to the Report and Recommendation. Respondents did not file a

response. In reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court "shall make

a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made," and "may

accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate

- 1 -

Case 3:12-cv-01701-DMS-NLS Document 24 Filed 02/25/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the Report and Recommendation and

Petitioner’s objections, the objections are overruled. The Report and Recommendation is adopted. 

The petition is denied. Petitioner’s request for certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 22, 2013

HON. DANA M. SABRAW

United States District Judge

- 2 -

Case 3:12-cv-01701-DMS-NLS Document 24 Filed 02/25/13 Page 2 of 2