Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00563/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00563-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PERRY A. McCULLOUGH,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-00563-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 13)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

(Doc. 8)

Perry A. McCullough (“plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On September 28, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On November 7, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:06-cv-00563-AWI -GBC Document 26 Filed 12/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Conclusory

assertions about conditions at a prison in another district do

not provide a basis for injunctive relief. Absent a showing that

this case has some connection with the Eastern District of

California, this case should be transferred to the Central

District of California, where the Terminal Island federal prison

is located. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 28,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order,

filed September 20, 2006, is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00563-AWI -GBC Document 26 Filed 12/18/06 Page 2 of 2