Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01495/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01495-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 29:791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Deborah Van Zaun

Plaintiff, 

v.

John E. Potter, Postmaster General

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-1495-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for more definite statement, requesting

that the Court require Plaintiff to amend her Complaint and provide the factual basis for

her claims of employment discrimination and retaliation (Dkt. 13). Plaintiff responded

with a request to file a Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 14). Plaintiff has already

amended her Complaint once before being served with a responsive pleading (see Dkt.

10). Further amendment thus requires leave of Court, and is to be freely given when

justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2).

The Court grants Plaintiff’s request to file her Second Amended Complaint. 

Defendant’s Motion for a more definite statement is therefore denied as moot. 

Accordingly, 

//

//

Case 2:07-cv-01495-SMM Document 15 Filed 02/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s request to file Second Amended

Complaint (Dkt. 14). The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Second Amended

Complaint attached to Plaintiff’s Response (Dkt. 14).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Defendant’s Motion for a more

definite statement (Dkt. 13).

DATED this 15th day of February, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-01495-SMM Document 15 Filed 02/15/08 Page 2 of 2