Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02844/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02844-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4814-5585-7960.1 1 3:14-CV-02844-RS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND RE: OMNI'S MSJ AND

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND AND PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE ADDT'L EVIDENCE

LEWIS

BRISBOIS

BISGAARD

&SMITHLLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

THOMAS A. RECTOR, SB# 199175

E-Mail: Thomas.Rector@lewisbrisbois.com

GREGORY B. CHIN, SB# 241126

E-Mail: Gregory.Chin@lewisbrisbois.com

333 Bush Street, Suite 1100

San Francisco, California 94104-2872

Telephone: 415.362.2580

Facsimile: 415.434.0882

Attorneys for Defendant OMNI HOTELS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JENNIFER K. LOVETT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

OMNI HOTELS & RESORTS, OMNI

HOTELS MANAGEMENT

CORPORATION, and DOES ONE through

ONE HUNDRED

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-02844-RS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER:

(1) EXTENDING OMNI’S TIME TO

REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S SUMMARY

JUDGMENT OPPOSITION [DKT. 89]

(2) EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO

REPLY TO OMNI’S OPPOSITION TO

MOTION TO AMEND [DKT. 90]; AND

(3) PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO LATEFILE DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF

HER OPPOSITION TO OMNI'S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, plaintiff Jennifer K. Lovett and defendant Omni Hotels

Management Corporation (“Omni”) stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on July 2, 2015, Omni filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 59);

WHEREAS, the Court set a September 25, 2015 deadline for Omni’s reply brief (Dkt. 68);

WHEREAS, on August 28, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Amend (Dkt. 83);

WHEREAS, the Court set both motions for hearing on November 5, 2015 (Dkt. 86);

WHEREAS, Omni’s counsel had a bench trial in San Francisco Superior Court this week

and therefore requests additional time to file its Reply;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff does not oppose Omni’s request for a one-week extension to file its

Reply;

Case 3:14-cv-02844-RS Document 94 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 4814-5585-7960.1 c

2 3:14-CV-02844-RS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND RE: OMNI'S MSJ AND

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND AND PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE ADDT'L EVIDENCE

LEWIS

BRISBOIS

BISGAARD

&SMITHLLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

WHEREAS, Plaintiff was unable to speak with declarant Mark Cibrario and obtain his

declaration until after the deadline for her opposition to Summary Judgment and wishes to file the

Declaration of Mark Cibrario in support of her Opposition;

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED as follows:

1. Omni shall have until October 2, 2015 to file its reply in support of Summary

Judgment. The deadline is extended by one week from September 25 to October 2, 2015;

2. Plaintiff shall have until September 25, 2015 to file her reply in support of her

Motion to Amend. The deadline is extended by one week from September 18 to September 25,

2015;

3. Plaintiff shall be permitted to file the Declaration of Mark Cibrario. Omni waives

any objection to timeliness but preserves all other objections to his declaration; and

4. The hearing date on both motions remains November 5, 2015.

DATED: September 16, 2015 WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY, & SCHOENBERGER

By: /s/ Doris Cheng

Doris Cheng

Attorney for Plaintiff JENNIFER LOVETT

DATED: September 16, 2015 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

By: /s/ Thomas A. Rector

Thomas A. Rector

Attorneys for Defendant OMNI HOTELS

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

9/17/15

Case 3:14-cv-02844-RS Document 94 Filed 09/17/15 Page 2 of 2