Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05314/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05314-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADAM SCOTT KOWARSH,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTHONY HECKMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-05314-MEJ 

ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE RE: PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

Re: Dkt. No. 21

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended 

Complaint. Dkt. No. 21. On March 16, 2015, Defendants Michael Carroll, Anthony Heckman, 

James Leal, John Robertson, and Ted Yamasaki filed an Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion. Dkt. 

No. 22. Defendants appear to be under the misconception that Plaintiff did not attach a copy of 

his proposed Second Amended Complaint to his Motion, but it is attached and included with 

Plaintiffs’ Motion. See Dkt. No. 21-1. Nevertheless, as Defendants’ current Opposition primarily 

focuses on this misconceived procedural defect, the Court will adjust the briefing in this matter to 

give these Defendants an opportunity to reply substantively to Plaintiff’s Motion. 

The Defendants listed above may file an amended Opposition by March 25, 2015, and 

Plaintiff may submit his reply briefing by April 1, 2015. The hearing in this matter will remain set 

for April 16, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 17, 2015

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-05314-MEJ Document 25 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 1