Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01401/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01401-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: service@moorelawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Oscar Flores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OSCAR FLORES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ROBERTO DELGADILLO dba BOB’S 

BARBER SHOP, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:15-cv-01401-MCE-SKO

STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF 

LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; ORDER

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Oscar Flores (“Plaintiff”), seeks to amend his complaint to 

allege additional barriers relating to his disability which were identified at the site inspection of 

the subject property conducted on April 11, 2016, as permitted by Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports 

(U.S.), Inc., 631 F.3d 939, 944 (9th Cir. 2011), and required by Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 

654 F.3d 903, 909 (9th Cir. 2011);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not unduly delayed the amendment, does not bring it in bad 

faith, the amendment is not futile, and such amendment does not prejudice Defendants,

Roberto Delgadillo dba Bob’s Barber Shop, Jimmy D. Trujillo, and Juanita A. Trujillo

(collectively “Defendants”), nor does the amendment in any way change the nature of the 

action;

Case 1:15-cv-01401-MCE-SKO Document 28 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the amendment will not modify any date or deadline fixed by the Court’s 

Pretrial Scheduling Order dated March 8, 2016 (Dkt. 23) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4);

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and 

Defendants, the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record, that Plaintiff may 

file a First Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff will file his First Amended Complaint 

within five (5) calendar days of the Court’s Order permitting such filing, and that Defendants’ 

response thereto shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after the First Amended Complaint is 

filed.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 21, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore 

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Oscar Flores

Dated: June 6, 2016 PHILLIPS MUNOZ LAW

/s/ Kathleen M. Phillips

Kathleen M. Phillips

Attorneys for Defendants,

Roberto Delgadillo dba Bob’s Barber Shop, Jimmy 

D. Trujillo, and Juanita A. Trujillo

Case 1:15-cv-01401-MCE-SKO Document 28 Filed 06/24/16 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

ORDER

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the above stipulation, and with good cause having been shown as required 

by the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order entered March 8, 2016 (Doc. 23),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint, a 

copy of which was filed with the Parties’ stipulation, within five (5) calendar days of the date 

this Order is filed. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ response thereto shall be filed within 

fourteen (14) days after the First Amended Complaint is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 23, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01401-MCE-SKO Document 28 Filed 06/24/16 Page 3 of 3