Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06408/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06408-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHRYN HOGAN, et al., CASE NO. CV-F-03-6408 LJO WMW

 

Plaintiffs, REQUEST FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

vs. REASONS

FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPUTY MICHAEL ROBINSON,

et al.,

Defendants.

 / 

On May 10, 1007, Plaintiffs and Plaintiff’s Counsel filed a motion for reconsideration of the

April 26, 2007 Order by the Magistrate Judge, which granted Defendants’ motion to preclude expert

witness testimony (Doc. 159), granted Defendant Patricia Towne’s motion to strike Plaintiffs’ expert

witness disclosure (Doc. 160), denied Plaintiffs’ counsel’s motion to withdraw (Doc. 164) and denied

Plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of Bradshaw counsel or certify order of April 17, 2007 for appeal

(Doc. 164). The order by the Magistrate Judge was entered into the court docket by minute order (Doc.

178). Because Plaintiffs request reconsideration of that order, and the reasons the Magistrate Judge

relied upon in deciding the four motions, this Court requests that the Magistrate Judge issue reasons for

its April 26, 2007 order for all motions thereof disposed. 

Counsel have also requested an ex parte hearing on shortened time for this motion for

reconsideration. This Court has granted the motion for an ex parte hearing and will hear the motion for

reconsideration on Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 1:30 p.m. Therefore, this Court requests that the

Magistrate Judge offer its reasons for the April 26, 2007 Order by Wednesday, May 16, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 14, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06408-LJO-GSA Document 194 Filed 05/14/07 Page 1 of 1