Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME ON 

DAUBERT MOTIONS 

Case No.: C04-03171-CRB-JL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL J. BERGESON, State Bar No. 105439 

dbergeson@be-law.com 

MELINDA M. MORTON, State Bar No. 209373 

mmorton@be-law.com 

BERGESON, LLP 

303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500 

San Jose, CA 95110-2712 

Telephone: (408) 291-6200 

Facsimile: (408) 297-6000 

 

MARK C. HANSEN 

mhansen@khhte.com 

J.C. ROZENDAAL 

jrozendaal@khhte.com 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C. 

Sumner Square 

1615 M Street, NW, Suite 400 

Washington, DC 20036 

Telephone: (202) 326-7900 

Facsimile: (202) 326-7999 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

OKI AMERICA, INC., OKI ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRY CO., LTD., OKI DATA 

CORPORATION, OKI DATA AMERICAS, 

INC., and OKI TELECOM, INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

Defendant. 

 Civil Action No. C 04-03171-CRB-JL 

STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME ON 

BRIEFING OF DAUBERT MOTIONS 

 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS, 

 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 428 Filed 09/20/06 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME ON 

DAUBERT MOTIONS 

Case No.: C04-03171-CRB-JL 

- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the Court’s May 15, 2006 scheduling order set September 14, 2006 as the 

deadline for both summary judgment motions and Daubert motions; and 

WHEREAS, the scheduling order sets October 5, 2006 as the deadline for oppositions to 

summary judgment motions and October 19, 2006 as the deadline for replies to summary 

judgment motions; and 

WHEREAS, there are no specified deadlines for oppositions and replies to Daubert 

motions other than the deadlines imposed by local rule 7-3 (which would call for oppositions to 

Daubert motions to be due on September 29 and replies to due on October 6, if those motions 

were noticed for the earliest allowable hearing date of October 20); and 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to have both the summary judgment motions and any 

Daubert motions heard together; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between all parties that, subject to 

approval by this Court, the time for filing and serving oppositions and replies to any Daubert 

motions is changed as follows: 

(1) Oppositions to Daubert motions must be filed and served on or before 

October 5, 2006. 

(2) Replies to Daubert motions must be filed and served on or before 

October 19, 2006.

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 428 Filed 09/20/06 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME ON 

DAUBERT MOTIONS 

Case No.: C04-03171-CRB-JL 

- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: September 18, 2006 VINSON & ELKINS, LLP 

 

/s/ Adam V. Floyd 

 Adam V. Floyd 

Attorney for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD & 

EVANS, PLLC 

/s/ J.C. Rozendaal 

 J.C. Rozendaal 

Attorney for Oki America., et al. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ 

Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Judge 

September 20, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 428 Filed 09/20/06 Page 3 of 3