Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01976/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01976-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Vanalbert Siegrist is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

This action is proceeding against Defendants Licensed Vocational Nurse Stringer and Doctor 

Nguyen on Plaintiff’s claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the 

Eighth Amendment.1 

On September 3, 2015, Defendant Stringer filed an answer to the complaint, and a discovery 

and scheduling order was issued on September 4, 2015. (ECF Nos. 56, 57.) 

On October 19, 2015, Defendant Nguyen filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 59.) 

///

 

1

Defendant Dutra was dismissed from the action for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust the administrative remedies (ECF No. 

55), and Defendant Johnson was dismissed from the action pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

(ECF No. 52.) 

VANALBERT SIEGRIST,

 Plaintiff,

v.

J.J. JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01976-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND 

SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANT 

NGUYEN

[ECF Nos. 57, 59]

Case 1:10-cv-01976-LJO-SAB Document 60 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In light of the fact that the discovery and scheduling order was issued prior to the filing of 

Defendant Nguyen’s answer, Defendant Nguyen is advised that the discovery and scheduling order 

issued September 4, 2015, is extended and made applicable to him as well as Defendant Stringer. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 20, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01976-LJO-SAB Document 60 Filed 10/21/15 Page 2 of 2