Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00874/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00874-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

 No. C 04-0874 RS 

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO SEAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

*E-Filed 03/29/2010* 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

RICHARD B. FOX, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

GOOD SAMARITAN L.P., et al, 

 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 04-0874 RS 

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO 

SEAL 

 Good cause appearing, the following sealing motions are GRANTED. 

 1. Docket No. 365, permitting the filing under seal of (a) the unredacted version of 

Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendant HCA Inc’s Motion 

for Summary Judgment ; (b) the unredacted version of the Declaration of Richard B. Fox, M.D. in 

Opposition to Defendant HCA Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment and attached exhibits; and (c) 

the unredacted version of the Declaration of James A. Hennefer in Opposition to Defendant HCA 

Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment and attached exhibits. 

 2. Docket No. 368, permitting the filing under seal of (a) the unredacted version of the 

Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 

Case 5:04-cv-00874-RS Document 448 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

 No. C 04-0874 RS 

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO SEAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

(b) the unredacted version of the Declaration of Carol Osterman and attached exhibits; and (c) the 

unredacted version of the Declaration of Amy Craig and attached exhibits. 

 3. Docket No. 379, permitting the filing under seal of (a) the unredacted version of Exhibit 

A to the Declaration of Lisa Vischer; and (b) the unredacted version of Exhibit A to the Declaration 

of Susan Scollan-Boring. 

 4. Docket No. 415, permitting the filing under seal of (a) the unredacted version of 

Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment ; (b) the unredacted version of the Declaration of Richard B. Fox, M.D. in 

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and attached exhibits; and (c) the 

unredacted version of the Declaration of James A. Hennefer in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion 

for Summary Judgment and attached exhibits. 

 5. Docket No. 419, permitting the filing under seal of (a) the unredacted version of 

Defendants’ Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment; (b) the unredacted version of 

the Declaration of Amy E. Craig in Support of Defendants’ Reply in Support of their Motion for 

Summary Judgment; (c) Exhibits B through E to the Declaration of Amy E. Craig; (d) the 

unredacted version of the Declaration of Carol Ostermann in Support of Defendants’ Reply in 

Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 03/29/2010 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:04-cv-00874-RS Document 448 Filed 03/29/10 Page 2 of 2