Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01126/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01126-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSE ESCOBEDO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHUN & ASSOCIATES, INC., dba 

R-N MARKET; JOHN R. COOK, 

Trustee of the JOHN R. COOK 

AND DEBRA L. COOK 2007 

REVOCABLE TRUST; DEBRA L. 

COOK, Trustee of the JOHN R. 

COOK AND DEBRA L. COOK 2007 

REVOCABLE TRUST, 

Defendant. 

No. 1:15-cv-01126-GEB-SMS 

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND 

DISPOSITION 

 Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Settlement of Entire 

Action” on October 6, 2015, in which he states: “Plaintiff . . . 

has settled the above-captioned matter with all Defendants. 

Plaintiff requests that he be given to and including November 5, 

2015 to file the dispositional documents in order to afford the 

Parties time to complete the settlement.” (Notice of Settlement, 

ECF No. 13.) 

 Therefore, a dispositional document shall be filed no 

later than November 5, 2015. Failure to respond by this deadline 

may be construed as consent to dismissal of this action without 

prejudice, and a dismissal order could be filed. See E.D. Cal. 

R. 160(b) (“A failure to file dispositional papers on the date 

Case 1:15-cv-01126-GEB-SMS Document 14 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

prescribed by the Court may be grounds for sanctions.”). 

 Further, the Status Conference scheduled for hearing on 

November 9, 2015, is continued to commence at 9:00 a.m. on 

December 7, 2015, in the event no dispositional document is 

filed, or if this action is not otherwise dismissed.1 A joint 

status report shall be filed fourteen (14) days prior to the 

status conference. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 7, 2015 

 

 

 

1

 The status conference will remain on calendar, because the mere 

representation that a case has been settled does not justify vacating a 

scheduling proceeding. Cf. Callie v. Near, 829 F.2d 888, 890 (9th Cir. 1987) 

(indicating that a representation that claims have been settled does not 

necessarily establish the existence of a binding settlement agreement). 

Case 1:15-cv-01126-GEB-SMS Document 14 Filed 10/07/15 Page 2 of 2