Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05735/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05735-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID WRIGHT, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

J. T. O'BRIEN, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:02-cv-05735-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 15)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On January 6, 2006, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED on the

merits. (Doc. 15). The Report and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice

that any objections were to be filed within thirty days from the date of service of that order. On

January 25, 2006, Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. 

(Doc. 17). On February 6, 2006, Respondent filed a Reply to Petitioner's objections. (Doc. 18). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

Case 1:02-cv-05735-AWI-TAG Document 22 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. As explained by the Magistrate Judge, Petitioner was given credit by either the

State of Oregon or United States for all time in custody. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3585(b) "A defendant

shall be given credit toward the service of a term of imprisonment for any time he has spent in

official detention prior to the date the sentence commences . . . that has not been credited against

another sentence." 18 U.S.C § 3585(b) (emphasis added). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation issued January 6, 2006 (Doc. 15), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05735-AWI-TAG Document 22 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 2