Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04051/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04051-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DORIS CROSLEY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

 CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-04051 JSW

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS

MOTION FOR PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On December 13, 2006, this Court approved the parties’ stipulation to modify certain

pretrial dates, and set the deadline to hear dispositive motions for August 10, 2007. Under this

Court’s Local Rules, the deadlines for filing dispositive motions was July 6, 2007. On that date,

Defendants’ timely filed a motion for summary judgment on most of Plaintiffs’ claims. 

Plaintiffs did not file any dispositive motions on that date. 

On July 20, 2007, Plaintiffs timely filed their opposition to Defendants’ motion for

summary judgment. On that date, they also filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment

on their first cause of action, and noticed the motion for hearing on August 10, 2007. That

motion was not timely filed, and was not filed with a request for leave to late file. As such, the

Court shall not consider the motion on August 10, 2007. 

If Plaintiffs wish to have the Court consider their cross-motion for summary judgment

past the deadline for filing such a motion, they must file an administrative motion

demonstrating good cause to grant such a request. Any such motion must be filed by no later

than July 25, 2007.

Case 3:05-cv-04051-JSW Document 61 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In the alternative, the parties may stipulate to hearing cross-motions. If the parties so

stipulate, the Court expresses no opinion on whether it will grant a request to hear both motions

on August 10, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 23, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-04051-JSW Document 61 Filed 07/23/07 Page 2 of 2