Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00466/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00466-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL R. PEREZ, 

Plaintiff,

v.

KEN CLARK, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00466-OWW-SMS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT C. MUNOZ

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(Docs. 29, 39, and 47)

Plaintiff, Daniel R. Perez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On March 24, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein

which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. On April 29, 2010, Plaintiff

filed objections. Defendants have not filed objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS: 

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed March 24, 2010, is adopted in full; 

2. Defendant Munoz’s un-enumerated 12b Motion to Dismiss for failure to exhaust

1

Case 1:08-cv-00466-OWW -SMS Document 48 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

administrative remedies, filed September 11, 2009, is GRANTED; and 

3. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Munoz are dismissed without prejudice,

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. sect 1997e(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 4, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-00466-OWW -SMS Document 48 Filed 05/05/10 Page 2 of 2