Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04083/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04083-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JENNIFER ARNOLD,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-04083-HSG 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. No. 32

On August 1, 2016, the Court issued an order granting Defendants’ motion for judgment 

on the pleadings and permitting Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by August 22, 2016. Dkt. 

No. 32 at 14. The deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint has passed, and Plaintiff has 

failed to respond.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not dismiss 

this action with prejudice in light of Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s order. See 

Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 1999) (“Under Ninth Circuit 

precedent, when a plaintiff fails to amend his complaint after the district judge dismisses the 

complaint with leave to amend, the dismissal is typically considered a dismissal for failing to

comply with a court order . . .”). Plaintiff must file a statement of two pages or less by August 29, 

2016, responding to this order to show cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

8/24/2016

Case 4:15-cv-04083-HSG Document 33 Filed 08/24/16 Page 1 of 1