Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00397/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00397-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 29:623 Job Discrimination (Age)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM J. WHITSITT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0397 MCE JFM PS

vs.

RON BARBOSA, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed July 18, 2007, plaintiff's second amended complaint was dismissed

and thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. On September 14, 2007,

plaintiff’s request for extension of time was partially granted; plaintiff was granted until

September 20, 2007 in which to file a third amended complaint. Plaintiff’s request for leave to

file further objections to the July 18, 2007 order dismissing the second amended complaint was

denied.

The September 20, 2007 deadline has now passed and plaintiff has not filed a

third amended complaint. Despite this court’s order to the contrary, plaintiff filed objections to

the dismissal of the second amended complaint (pl.’s September 17, 2007 objections), rather than

filing a third amended complaint pursuant to the July 18, 2007 order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Case 2:06-cv-00397-MCE -JFM Document 61 Filed 10/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 9, 2007.

001; whitsitt.fta2

Case 2:06-cv-00397-MCE -JFM Document 61 Filed 10/10/07 Page 2 of 2