Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00226/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00226-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL

WO SC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Karl Louis Guillen, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Quincy Owens, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 10-0226-PHX-MHM (LOA)

ORDER

Plaintiff Karl Louis Guillen, who is confined in the Special Management Unit (SMU)

I of the Arizona State Prison Complex-Eyman, in Florence, Arizona, commenced this action

by filing a motion for leave to exceed the page limit in his pro se civil rights Complaint,

which is brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; a motion to defer filing fees until September 15,

2010; and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc.# 1, 3, 4, 5.) The Court

granted Plaintiff’s motion to exceed the page limit and ordered the Complaint filed. (Doc.#

8.) The Court denied the motion to defer filing fees and denied as incomplete his in forma

pauperis application with leave to pay the filing fee or to file a properly complete in forma

pauperis application within 30 days. (Id.) Shortly before the filing of that Order, Plaintiff

filed a motion to expedite this case. (Doc.# 7.) The Court will deny that motion where

Plaintiff has not yet paid the filing fee or filed a properly complete in forma pauperis

application. 

///

Case 2:10-cv-00226-JWS Document 10 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JDDL - 2 -

Warnings

A. Address Changes

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

action.

B. Copies

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice

to Plaintiff.

C. Possible Dismissal

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of the March 26, 2010 Order,

doc.# 8), and these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See

Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an

action for failure to comply with any order of the Court).

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to expedite is denied. (Doc.# 7.) 

DATED this 5th day of April, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-00226-JWS Document 10 Filed 04/06/10 Page 2 of 2