Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04781/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04781-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Set Briefing Schedule for Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

Case No. 3:14-cv-04781-RS 

BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK

Norman B. Blumenthal (SBN 068687) 

Kyle R. Nordrehaug (SBN 205975) 

Aparajit Bhowmik (SBN 248066) 

Piya Mukherjee (SBN 274217) 

2255 Calle Clara 

La Jolla, CA 92037 

Telephone:(858)551-1223

Facsimile:(858)551-1232 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PAYAL PATEL 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Jon D. Meer (SBN 144389) 

E-mail: jmeer@seyfarth.com 

Sheryl L. Skibbe (SBN 199441) 

E-mail: sskibbe@seyfarth.com 

Casey J.T. McCoy (SBN 229106) 

E-mail: cjtmccoy@seyfarth.com 

Maya Harel (SBN 291990) 

E-mail: mharel@seyfarth.com 

2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 

Los Angeles, California 90067-3021 

Telephone: (310) 277-7200 

Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAYAL PATEL, an individual, on behalf

of herself, on behalf of all persons 

similarly situated, and as the 

representative of the State of California, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC., a 

Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, 

inclusive,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:14-cv-04781-RS

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

CONTINUE HEARING DATE

Case 3:14-cv-04781-RS Document 28 Filed 03/05/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation to Set Briefing Schedule for Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

Case No. 3:14-cv-04781-RS 

 Plaintiff PAYAL PATEL (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant NIKE RETAIL 

SERVICES, INC. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby 

stipulate as follows: 

 WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on February 

19, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff will require certain discovery for purposes of opposing 

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment including, but not limited to, the 

deposition of Defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 30(b)(6); 

 WHEREAS, Defendant has agreed to produce the following discovery in 

advance of Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose the motion for summary judgment: 

x Witness(es) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 30(b)(6) by April 3, 2015 per the 

Parties’ agreement; 

x Cash register receipt records for Plaintiff from December 30, 2012 to her 

date of termination by March 16, 2015; 

x Email communications between Plaintiff and her direct supervisor (1) 

containing the following terms: “ringing,” “register,” “cash register,” “cash,” 

“ring,” “stocking,” “stock,” and “stockroom” by March 31, 2015; 

x Documents which Defendant agreed to produce in response to Plaintiff’s 

Requests for Production of Documents, Set One by March 16, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff will serve a request for production of documents 

regarding Defendant’s “Manager on Duty” policy by March 6, 2015 for purposes 

of opposing Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff will not be seeking any other discovery related to the 

filing of the opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment besides what 

has been addressed above; 

 WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and have agreed that it is 

appropriate to set a briefing schedule for Defendant’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment; 

Case 3:14-cv-04781-RS Document 28 Filed 03/05/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Stipulation to Set Briefing Schedule for Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

Case No. 3:14-cv-04781-RS 

 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to the following briefing schedule, 

subject to Court approval: 

x Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment shall be 

filed on April 16, 2015; 

x Defendant’s reply in support of the Motion for Summary Judgment 

shall be filed on May 7, 2015; 

x The hearing for Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment shall be 

May 21, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: March 4, 2015 BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & 

BHOWMIK 

By /s/Piya Mukherjee Piya Mukherjee Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DATED: March 4, 2015 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

By /s/Maya Harel __ Maya Harel Attorneys for Defendant 

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ______________________________

 Honorable Richard Seeborg 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

3/5/2015

Case 3:14-cv-04781-RS Document 28 Filed 03/05/15 Page 3 of 3