Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-05442/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-05442-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YUMIKO HURST,

Plaintiff,

v.

BIGGE CRANES AND RIGGING CO., et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-05442-SI 

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT 

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Re: Dkt. No. 9

On August 29, 2019, pro se Plaintiff Yumiko Hurst filed a complaint and an application for 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. Nos. 1, 3. 

On September 3, 2019, Magistrate Judge Dona Ryu granted Plaintiff’s IFP application and 

noted that the Court would determine separately whether the complaint should be served. Dkt. No. 

5. On September 24, 2019, Judge Ryu issued an order screening the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e) and ordering Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint that addressed the deficiencies 

identified in the screening order by October 8, 2019. Dkt. No. 7. Judge Ryu warned Plaintiff that 

failure to file a timely first amended complaint would result in a recommendation that her action be 

dismissed. Id. at 7. No amended complaint was filed. On October 16, 2019, Judge Ryu issued a 

report and recommendation reassigning the case to a district court judge for final disposition, with 

the recommendation that the action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and 

further ordered any party may file objections to the report and recommendation with the district 

judge within 14 days after being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

72(a); N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 72-2.

The parties have had well beyond 14 days to object and no such objection has been lodged 

Case 3:19-cv-05442-SI Document 11 Filed 02/10/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

or otherwise filed. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this action, adopts 

Judge Ryu’s report and recommendation and dismisses the action without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2020

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:19-cv-05442-SI Document 11 Filed 02/10/20 Page 2 of 2