Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01783/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01783-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOSES FLORES,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHILES BAR AND GRILL, ET AL.,

Defendants.

No. 1:13-cv-01783-DAD-EPG

ORDER REISSUING MAGISTRAGTE 

JUDGE’S OCTOBER 9,2015 ORDER

(Doc. No. 30)

Plaintiff Moses Flores filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on 

November 4, 2013. (Doc. No. 1.) On June 17, 2014, the then assigned Magistrate Judge issued 

an order dismissing plaintiff’s original complaint with leave to amend. (Doc. No. 7.) On January 

28, 2015, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 18.) After being granted a 

motion for extension of time, plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint which the then 

assigned Magistrate Judge again dismissed with leave to amend. (Doc. Nos. 25, 26, 28.) On 

October 5, 2015, plaintiff filed another motion for extension of time in which to comply with the 

court’s order and also included a notice of change of address to “1112 E. Tulare St, Visalia, CA 

93277.” (Doc. No. 29.) On October 9, 2015, the then assigned Magistrate Judge granted 

plaintiff’s request for extension of time, provided Flores with until November 30, 2015 to file any 

Third Amended Complaint he wished to pursue, and advised him that any failure to file a Third 

Amended Complaint would result in the dismissal of this action. (Doc. No. 30.) The Magistrate 

Case 1:13-cv-01783-DAD-EPG Document 33 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Judge’s order, however, was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. The Court has 

since discovered that plaintiff’s new address was incorrectly entered on the docket as “112 E. 

Tulare, Visalia, CA 93277.” Consequently, to afford plaintiff proper notice, the Court will 

reissue the Magistrate Judge’s October 9, 2015 order and provide plaintiff with additional time to 

file a Third Amended Complaint in this action. The Court will also reattempt service of the 

subsequent orders reassigning this action to Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean (Doc. No. 31) and 

to District Judge Dale A. Drozd (Doc. No. 32).

Accordingly, 

1) The Clerk of the Court is directed to correct plaintiff’s address of record on the docket 

to “1112 E. Tulare St, Visalia, CA 93277.”

2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to reattempt service of the orders reassigning the 

action to Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean (Doc. No. 31) and to District Judge Dale 

A. Drozd (Doc. No. 32).

3) Plaintiff’s Motion for an Extension to file a Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 29) is 

GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file the Third Amended Complaint no later than January 

30, 2016. Plaintiff is advised that future Motions to Extend will be looked upon with 

disfavor. Plaintiff is also advised that failure to file the Third Amended Complaint by 

January 30, 2016 will result in dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 11, 2015 

 DALE A. DROZD

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01783-DAD-EPG Document 33 Filed 12/14/15 Page 2 of 2