Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-01777/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-01777-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 06cv1777 LAB(RBB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FLUID RX, INC., a Delaware

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

GARY W. ROY, an individual;

GARY W. ROY dba GWR SPECIALTY

AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS; ALDOSOFT

ENGINEERING, a company of

unknown origin,

Defendants. _______________________________

GARY W. ROY, an individual;

GARY W. ROY dba GWR SPECIALTY

AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS,

Counter-Claimants,

v.

FLUID RX, INC., a Delaware

corporation; RON SCHORNSTEIN,

an individual; RON MCELROY, an

individual,

Counter-Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 06cv1777 LAB(RBB)

ORDER FOLLOWING EARLY NEUTRAL

EVALUATION CONFERENCE, SETTING

RULE 26 COMPLIANCE AND NOTICE

OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Case 3:06-cv-01777-LAB-RBB Document 32 Filed 11/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K:\COMMON\BROOKS\CASES\FLUID1777\Rule26.wpd 2 06cv1777 LAB(RBB)

On November 8, 2006, the Court held an early neutral

evaluation conference in the above-entitled action. Settlement

could not be reached in the case.

The Court discussed compliance with rule 26 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure and issues the following orders:

1. No objections were presented to initial disclosure under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, rule 26(a)(1)(A-D). The parties

are ordered to proceed with the initial disclosure process. Any

objections to initial disclosure will be resolved as required by

rule 26.

2. The rule 26(f) conference shall be completed on or before

December 2, 2006.

3. No discovery plan is required.

4. The initial disclosures pursuant to rule 26(a)(1)(A-D)

shall occur on or before December 15, 2006.

5. A telephonic settlement conference is set for December 11,

2006, at 8:00 a.m. Counsel for Plaintiff is to initiate the call.

Plaintiff's(s') counsel shall serve a copy of this order on

all parties that enter this case after the date of this order.

Failure of any counsel or party to comply with this order may

result in sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 8, 2006

 Ruben B. Brooks

United States Magistrate Judge

cc:

Judge Burns

All Parties of Record

Case 3:06-cv-01777-LAB-RBB Document 32 Filed 11/08/06 Page 2 of 2