Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-01234/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-01234-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PORFIRIO LAMARQUE,

Plaintiff,

v.

JIM BARCUS, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:18-cv-01234-DAD-JLT (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(Doc. No. 18)

Plaintiff Porfirio LaMarque, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights 

action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 19, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 

recommending that the action be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to comply 

with a court order. (Doc. No. 18.) Therein, plaintiff was provided fourteen days in which to file 

objections to the findings and recommendations. (Id. at 1–2.) Plaintiff filed a request for 

extension of time to file his objections. (Doc. No. 19.) Plaintiff’s request was granted, and he

was directed to file his objections on or before February 8, 2020. (Doc. No. 20.) To date, no 

objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so 

has now passed.

Case 1:18-cv-01234-DAD-JLT Document 22 Filed 02/25/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), the court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 19, 2019 (Doc. No. 18) are 

adopted in full; 

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with a 

court order; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending motions (Doc. No. 15) and 

to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 24, 2020 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:18-cv-01234-DAD-JLT Document 22 Filed 02/25/20 Page 2 of 2