Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01574/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01574-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER JAMES,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1574 FCD PAN P

vs.

J. SOLIS, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner paid the filing fee. 

On September 21, 2005, the district court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss

petitioner’s third claim for relief for failure to exhaust available state remedies, denied

petitioner’s motion to stay pending exhaustion of that claim, and granted petitioner’s alternative

motion to delete the third claim for relief. This action therefore proceeds on petitioner’s first and

second claims for relief. Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed

violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to answer those two

claims.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within 45 days from the date of this order, respondent shall file and serve an

answer to the first and second claims for relief in the petition for writ of habeas filed in this court

Case 2:04-cv-01574-FCD-KJN Document 14 Filed 05/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The action was transferred to this court from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of California and filed herein on that date.

2

on August 5, 2004.1 See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondent shall include

with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the

issues presented in the application. Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; and

2. Petitioner’s reply, if any, is due on or before 30 days from the date

respondent’s answer is filed. 

DATED: May 11, 2006.

\004;jame1574.100 

Case 2:04-cv-01574-FCD-KJN Document 14 Filed 05/12/06 Page 2 of 2