Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00464/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00464-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

ANDREWS FARMS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CALCOT, LTD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00464-LJO-SKO

ORDER REQUIRING

SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT

SCHEDULING REPORT

On July 15, 2010, in an attempt to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)(2) and

the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference issued by this Court on March 23, 2007 

("March 23, 2007 Order"), the parties filed a joint scheduling report. After reviewing the parties'

joint scheduling report, the Court notes that the parties have failed to submit a complete and detailed

discovery plan that provides proposed dates for the filing of non-dispositive or dispositive motions,

a pre-trial conference date, or a trial date. 

Exhibit "A" of the March 23, 2007 Order explicitly states that the parties are required to

submit a joint scheduling report containing, among other things, a firm cut-off date for discovery,

a proposed date for disclosure of expert witnesses, dates agreed to byall counsel for filing of pre-trial

motions, a pre-trial conference date, and a trial date. As none of this information was included in

the parties' joint scheduling report, their submission is entirely inadequate. Therefore, the Court

requires the parties to confer and submit a supplemental joint scheduling report that comports with

1

Case 1:07-cv-00464-LJO -JLT Document 269 Filed 07/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

both the March 23, 2007 Order and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties confer and submit a

supplemental joint scheduling report on or before July 19, 2010, at 4:00 p.m. that complies with

all of the requirements of the March 23, 2007 Order, including a complete and detailed 

discovery plan, proposed dates agreed to by all counsel for filing of pre-trial motions, a pretrial conference date, and a trial date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 16, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:07-cv-00464-LJO -JLT Document 269 Filed 07/16/10 Page 2 of 2