Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01355/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01355-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Susan Childress, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Scottsdale Healthcare Corp., et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-1355-PHX-FJM

ORDER

The court has before it plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (doc. 11), asking us to

reconsider our order summarily granting defendant Scottsdale Healthcare Corporation’s

motion to dismiss pursuant to LRCiv 7.2(i) (doc. 9).

Plaintiff’s counsel now asks us to reconsider our ruling, asserting that he did not

receive defendant’s motion to dismiss. The docket demonstrates otherwise. The notice of

electronic filing entered on July 1, 2009, shows that the notice of the motion to dismiss was

electronically mailed to plaintiff’s counsel at his correct email address. Under our local

rules, “Notice of Electronic Filing to a Registered User’s email address constitutes service

of the hyperlinked document(s).” LRCiv 5.5(h). The clerk’s record indicates that the notice

was successfully delivered. Counsel’s unsworn statement that he did not receive the notice

is insufficient to rebut the presumption of receipt of service. 

The motion for reconsideration is denied (doc. 11).

DATED this 26th day of August, 2009.

Case 2:09-cv-01355-FJM Document 13 Filed 08/27/09 Page 1 of 1