Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01616/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01616-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2729

Attorneys for Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INDERJIT KAUR,

Plaintiff,

v.

Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland

Security, et al.

 Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 07-F-CV-1616 LJO GSA

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:

EXTENSION OF TIME

This is an immigration case in which plaintiff has filed to challenge U.S. Citizenship and

Immigration Services’ (CIS) failure to timely adjudicate his application for naturalization,

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b). Defendants respectfully inform the Court that plaintiff Kaur’s

application is currently pending clearance by the Federal Bureau of Investigations. CIS has

requested that the name check be expedited in this case. Once the FBI has completed the name

check, CIS will resume the processing of the application in the most expedited manner possible.

Toward the end of resolving the matter at the agency level, the parties therefore stipulate to a 60-

day extension of time for the filing of the government’s answer. 

The parties stipulate that the time for filing the government’s answer be extended to March 4,

2008, and that the scheduling conference, currently set for that same date, be reset to sometime

after the new answer due date.

Case 1:07-cv-01616-LJO-GSA Document 14 Filed 01/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

 

Dated: January 3, 2008

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/Audrey Hemesath

Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

By: /s/ James M. Makasian

James M. Makasian

Attorney for the Plaintiff

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the defendants’ Answer is due on March 4, 2008, and that the scheduling

conference is reset to April 21, 2008 at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 4 (LJO). .

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01616-LJO-GSA Document 14 Filed 01/04/08 Page 2 of 2