Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00503/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00503-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIJON KINNEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

P.D. BRAZELTON, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00503-AWI-MJS (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

TO THE COURT TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE

(ECF No. 54)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 

rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against 

Defendant Flores on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims for inadequate medical care 

and cruel and unusual punishment.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s May 23, 2016 “Motion to the Court to Respond to 

Plaintiff’s Response.” (ECF No. 54.) The motion seeks a ruling on Plaintiff’s request to 

amend his complaint. (ECF No. 53.) The Court has ruled on the motion to amend. It was 

denied without prejudice on May 27, 2016. (ECF No. 55.) 

Case 1:14-cv-00503-AWI-MJS Document 60 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s “Motion to the Court to Respond to Plaintiff’s Response” is 

HEREBY DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2016 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00503-AWI-MJS Document 60 Filed 06/21/16 Page 2 of 2