Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_19-cv-01690/USCOURTS-casd-3_19-cv-01690-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

1 

19cv1690-L-LL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KYRIBA CORP., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PROVIDA COMMERCIAL FINANCE, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

 Case No.: 19cv1690-L-LL 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT 

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 

ORDER WITH MODIFICATIONS 

[ECF No. 20] 

 

 On December 31, 2019, the Parties filed a “Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated 

Protective Order.” ECF No. 20. The Court has considered the stipulated protective order 

and, for good cause shown, the joint motion is GRANTED with the following 

modifications: 

1. Paragraph 8 should read as follows: “Information designated 

“CONFIDENTIAL - FOR COUNSEL ONLY” must be viewed only by counsel (as defined 

in paragraph 3) of the receiving party, court personnel, and by independent experts under 

the conditions set forth in this Paragraph. The right of any independent expert to receive 

any confidential information will be subject to the advance approval of such expert by the 

producing party or by permission of the Court. The party seeking approval of an 

Case 3:19-cv-01690-L-LL Document 22 Filed 01/06/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 3
2 

19cv1690-L-LL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

independent expert must provide the producing party with the name and curriculum vitae 

of the proposed independent expert, and an executed copy of the form attached hereto as 

Exhibit A, in advance of providing any confidential information of the producing party to 

the expert. Any objection by the producing party to an independent expert receiving 

confidential information must be made in writing within fourteen (14) days following 

receipt of the identification of the proposed expert. Confidential information may be 

disclosed to an independent expert if the fourteen (14) day period has passed and no 

objection has been made. The approval of independent experts must not be unreasonably 

withheld.” 

2. Paragraph 12 should read as follows: “Before any materials produced in 

discovery, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admissions, deposition 

transcripts, or other documents which are designated as confidential information are filed 

with the Court for any purpose, the party seeking to file such material must seek permission 

of the Court to file the material under seal. No document shall be filed under seal, and the 

Court shall not be required to take any action, without separate prior order by the judge 

before whom the hearing or proceedings will take place, after application by the affected 

party with appropriate notice to opposing counsel. The parties shall follow and abide by 

applicable law, including Civil Local Rule 79.2, Section 2.j of the Electronic Case Filing 

Administrative Policies and Procedures, and the Chambers Rules of the applicable judge, 

with respect to filing documents under seal. A sealing order may issue only upon a request 

that establishes that the document, or portions thereof, is privileged or otherwise subject to 

protection under the law. The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of 

sensitive personal or confidential information. An unredacted version of the document, 

identifying the portions subject to the motion to seal, must be lodged with the motion to 

seal. A redacted version of the document must be publicly filed simultaneously with the 

motion or ex parte application to file under seal.” 

3. Paragraph 13 should read as follows: “At any stage of these proceedings, any 

party may object to a designation of the materials as confidential information. The party 

Case 3:19-cv-01690-L-LL Document 22 Filed 01/06/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 3
3 

19cv1690-L-LL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

objecting to confidentiality must notify, in writing, counsel for the designating party of the 

objected-to materials and the grounds for the objection. If the dispute is not resolved 

consensually between the parties within seven (7) days of receipt of such a notice of 

objections, the objecting party may move the Court for a ruling on the objection. The 

motion must be timely according to the Chambers Rules of the applicable judge and in 

conformance with any requirements set forth in the Local Rules and the Chambers Rules 

of the applicable Judge. The material at issue must be treated as confidential information, 

as designated by the designating party, until the Court has ruled on the objection or the 

matter has been otherwise resolved.” 

4. Paragraph 26 should read as follows: “The Court may modify the protective 

order in the interests of justice or for public policy reasons.” 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 6, 2020 

Case 3:19-cv-01690-L-LL Document 22 Filed 01/06/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 3