Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02056/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02056-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 

---

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

AAT BIOQUEST, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TEXAS FLUORESCENCE LABORATORIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

______________________ 

2016-2056

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 4:14-cv-03909-DMR, 

Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu.

______________________ 

Decided: February 15, 2017

______________________ 

KRISTA MARIE CARTER, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer 

LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also 

represented by DEBORAH E. FISHMAN. 

RICK B. YEAGER, Austin, TX, argued for defendantappellant. 

______________________ 

Before PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges.

Case: 16-2056 Document: 45-2 Page: 1 Filed: 02/15/2017
2 AAT BIOQUEST, INC. v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE

PER CURIAM. 

On this limited record and in light of the arguments 

raised, the district court judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED

Case: 16-2056 Document: 45-2 Page: 2 Filed: 02/15/2017