Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00023/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00023-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND REQUEST TO 

CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO 

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

5776 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 200 

Pleasanton, California 94588 

Telephone: (925) 227-9200 

Facsimile: (925) 227-9202 

012904.00008/241274v1 

Robert Fried, State Bar No. 85579 

ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO 

A Professional Corporation 

5776 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 200 

Pleasanton, California 94588 

Telephone: (925) 227-9200 

Facsimile: (925) 227-9202 

Attorneys for Defendant Creteguard, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND WE4LFARE 

TRUST FUND, et al, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CRETEGUARD, INC., aka CRETE GUARD 

CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., a California 

Corporation, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. CV 10-00023 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

ANSWER COMPLAINT AND

REQUEST TO CONTINUE INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO 

THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. 

BREYER

DATE: 

TIME: 

DEPT: 

In an initial request submitted to this Court on March 15, 2010, based on which the Court 

issued an Order dated March 17, 2010 allowing for an additional period for Defendant to 

respond to the complaint in this matter. As noted with the initial request, this case primarily 

concerns trust fund payments alleged to be due under a labor agreement. Application of the 

labor agreement to the underlying work performed may become an issue to be litigated. 

However, the parties, being experienced litigators in these matters, have agreed to set a period 

for audit of the claims presented and for discussion and review in aid of settlement among all 

concerned parties. 

The parties have acted in accordance with the above representations. An employer self 

Case 3:10-cv-00023-CRB Document 15 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND REQUEST TO 

CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO 

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

5776 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 200 

Pleasanton, California 94588 

Telephone: (925) 227-9200 

Facsimile: (925) 227-9202 

012904.00008/241274v1 

audit was conducted and the audit information was provided to Plaintiffs counsel for review by 

the trusts. That review is currently underway and, as of this date, has not been completed. 

Accordingly, it is requested that the Court allow an additional period of time for the audit 

process to be completed in the expectation this case will then be resolved and thus extend the 

time for Defendant to respond to the complaint in this matter. 

It is requested that the date to be set is April 30, 2010. Because that day is after the initial 

case management order set in this matter (April 16, 2010), the parties request the Court reset the 

Case Management Conference to a date subsequent to April 30, 2010 at the convenience of the 

Court. 

DATED: March 23, 2010 

ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO 

 

By: /s/Robert Fried 

Robert Fried, Esq. 

Attorneys for Defendant Creteguard, Inc. 

DATED: March 23, 2010 

SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 

By: /s/Michele R. Stafford 

Michele R. Stafford, Esq. 

Attorneys for All Plaintiffs 

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby 

orders that the time to answer complaint be set at _____________________, 2010. 

The initial Case Management Conference in this matter is continued until _________, 

2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________ 

_____________________________ 

May 7

May 14 at 8:30 a.m. March 29, 2010

Case 3:10-cv-00023-CRB Document 15 Filed 03/30/10 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND REQUEST TO 

CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO 

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

5776 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 200 

Pleasanton, California 94588 

Telephone: (925) 227-9200 

Facsimile: (925) 227-9202 

012904.00008/241274v1 

Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

Judge of the District Court 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:10-cv-00023-CRB Document 15 Filed 03/30/10 Page 3 of 3