Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05420/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05420-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

No. C-03-05420 RMW

CCL

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 6/29/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JAMAR JAMES EVANS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNKNOWN NAMES OF DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS OFFICERS and SANTA

CLARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Defendants.

No. C-03-05420 RMW

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF

FROM JUDGMENT

[Re Docket No. 186]

Plaintiff's appeal to the Ninth Circuit was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the

notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the entry of judgment on January 5, 2010. 

Plaintiff claims that notice of judgment was not mailed to him until February 10, 2010. Plaintiff

seeks additional time to file his notice of appeal and thus moves for relief from judgment under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. As explained in the court's June 14, 2010 order, the time for

filing an appeal is tolled while a party files a motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

60 only if the motion is filed no later than 28 days after judgment is entered. Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(4)(A)(vi). Plaintiff did not file a motion for relief from judgment within 28 days from January

5, 2010, the date of entry of judgment. Plaintiff's motion is therefore denied. 

DATED: 6/29/10

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:03-cv-05420-RMW Document 187 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 1