Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00598/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00598-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

[Proposed] Order Regarding Stipulated Protective Order

Williams v. County of Sacramento, et al.

Case No.: 2:20-cv-00598-TLN-KJN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Lawrance A. Bohm (SBN: 208716)

lbohm@bohmlaw.com

Daniel T. Newman (SBN: 314937)

dnewman@bohmlaw.com

Scott C. Zienty (SBN: 324661)

szienty@bohmlaw.com

BOHM LAW GROUP, INC.

4600 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 210

Sacramento, California 95834

Telephone: 866.920.1292

Facsimile: 916.927.2046

Gregory R. Davenport (SBN: 154403)

grdatlaw@aol.com

LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY R. DAVENPORT

3439 Brookside Road, Suite 205

Stockton, California 95219

Telephone: 209.955.1999

Facsimile: 209.475.4951

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Thomas Williams

Van Longyear (SBN: 84189) Carl L. Fessenden (SBN: 161494)

longyear@longyearlaw.com cfessenden@porterscott.com

Nicole M. Cahill (SBN: 287165) John R. Whitefleet (SBN: 213301)

cahill@longyearlaw.com jwhitefleet@porterscott.com

LONGYEAR & LAVRA, LLP PORTER SCOTT

3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 350 University Avenue, Ste. 200

Sacramento, CA 95864 Sacramento, CA 95825

Telephone: 916.974.8500 Telephone: 916.929.1481

Facsimile: 916.974.8510 Facsimile: 916.927.3706

Attorneys for Defendant, Attorneys for Defendant

County of Sacramento City of Rancho Cordova; Nathan Daniel; 

Joseph Zalec; and Derek Hutchins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; CITY OF 

RANCHO CORDOVA; NATHAN DANIEL; 

JOSEPH ZALEC; DEREK HUTCHINS; and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:20-cv-00598-TLN-KJN

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Action Filed: March 18, 2020

Trial Date: Not Set

Case 2:20-cv-00598-TLN-CSK Document 22 Filed 06/30/21 Page 1 of 2
2

[Proposed] Order Regarding Stipulated Protective Order

Williams v. County of Sacramento, et al.

Case No.: 2:20-cv-00598-TLN-KJN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The court APPROVES the parties’ stipulated protective order (ECF No. 21) subject to 

the following clarification. Once this action is closed, “unless otherwise ordered, the court will 

not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of” this protective order. E.D. Cal. 

R. 141.1(f). Courts in the district generally do not agree to retain jurisdiction after closure of 

the case. See, e.g., MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc., 2017 WL 495778 (E.D. Cal., 

Feb. 3, 2017).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 30, 2021

Case 2:20-cv-00598-TLN-CSK Document 22 Filed 06/30/21 Page 2 of 2