Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02791/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02791-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES –

SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company doing business as Shasta 

Regional Medical Center,

Plaintiff,

v.

SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her 

official capacity as Secretary of the 

Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendant.

No. 2:14-cv-02791-TLN-KJN

ORDER RELATING CASES

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES –

SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company doing business as Shasta 

Regional Medical Center,

Plaintiff,

v.

SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her 

official capacity as Secretary of the 

Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendant.

No. 2:16-cv-02521-TLN-CMK

Case 2:14-cv-02791-TLN-KJN Document 47 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES –

SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company doing business as Shasta 

Regional Medical Center,

Plaintiff,

v.

SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her 

official capacity as Secretary of the 

Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendant.

No. 2:16-cv-02278-VC

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that they are related within the meaning 

of Local Rule 123(a) (E.D. Cal. 1997). The actions involve the same parties, are based on the 

same claims, the same event, the same questions of fact and the same questions of law, and would 

therefore entail a substantial duplication of labor if heard by different judges. Accordingly, the 

assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of judicial 

effort.

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely has the 

result that these actions are assigned to the same judge. No consolidation of the actions is 

affected. Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge 

and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated 2:16-cv-02521-TLN-CMK

and 2:16-cv-02278-VC are hereby reassigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate 

Judge Kendall Newman for all further proceedings. Any dates currently set in the reassigned 

cases are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases

shall be shown as: 2:16-cv-02521-TLN-KJN and 2:16-cv-02278-TLN-KJN, respectively.

IT IS ORDERED that the case denominated 2:14-cv-02791-TLN-KJN is designated the 

lead case for the purposes of relating any future cases. The Court also notes that the cases related 

under this order are also related to the cases already noticed as related to the lead case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court make appropriate adjustments in the 

Case 2:14-cv-02791-TLN-KJN Document 47 Filed 11/22/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.

Dated: November 21, 2016

Case 2:14-cv-02791-TLN-KJN Document 47 Filed 11/22/16 Page 3 of 3