Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06584/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06584-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAMERON HOOKER, CASE NO. CV-F-04-6584 REC DLB P

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

vs.

[Doc. 30]

D.ADAMS, 

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Plaintiff filed the complaint upon which this action proceeds on November 19, 2004. On

November 22, 2005, this Court recommended that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted in part but

that plaintiff be granted leave to file an amended complaint. On December 15, 2005, the Court issued

a clarification of its recommendation, at plaintiff’s request. 

On January 17, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for clarification on a question of law asking the

Court what constitutional amendment would be violated if CDC required inmates to send home hearing

aids and eyeglasses. Plaintiff is advised that the court may not issue an advisory opinion. See Flast v.

Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 96 (1968). Plaintiff is referred to this Court’s previous recommendation regarding

the legal authority relevant to the issues in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 24, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06584-LJO -DLB Document 31 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 1