Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04108/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04108-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 C06-04108 MJJ 

TODD BOLEY, No. 68119

ERICKSON, BEASLEY, HEWITT & WILSON LLP

483 Ninth Street, Suite 200

Oakland, California 94607

Telephone: (510) 839-3448; Fax: (510) 839-1622

Attorneys for Defendants

County of Alameda, Charles Plummer, Leendert

Verburg, Michael Giammalvo, James Russell, Sean

Osborne and Gina Livensparger

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOUIS PATTON and ELIJAH KING-WRIGHT,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a governmental entity;

CHARLES PLUMMER, in his capacity as Sheriff

for the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; LEENDERT

VERBURG, individually, and in his capacity as a

deputy sheriff for the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA;

MICHAEL GIAMMALVO, individually and in his

capacity as a deputy sheriff for the COUNTY OF

ALAMEDA; JAMES RUSSELL, individually and

in his capacity as a deputy sheriff for the COUNTY

OF ALAMEDA; SEAN OSBORNE,

individually and in his capacity as a deputy sheriff

for the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; GINA

LIVENSPARGER, individually and in her capacity

as a deputy sheriff for the COUNTY

OF ALAMEDA; and DOES 1-25, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-04108 MJJ

Date: October 24, 2006

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Courtroom11, 19th Floor

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF

CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

Judge: Martin J. Jenkins

The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and jointly request that the

Case Management Conference scheduled for October 24, 2006,the Rule 26 Initial Disclosure

Statements and production of documents and things, and the Joint Case Management Conference

Statement, be continued for a period of sixty (60) days, or as soon hereafter as the Court deems

appropriate.

Case 3:06-cv-04108-MJJ Document 21 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:06-cv-04108-MJJ Document 22 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 2 C06-04108 MJJ 

This Stipulation and proposed Order are made due to the following facts:

1. Edwin J. Wilson, Jr., the attorney originally assigned to this case from Erickson,

Beasley, Hewitt & Wilson LLP, the law firm representing defendants, has taken a new position with

the firm of Lafayette and Kumagai, effective October 1, 2006. This new firm is not currently on the

panel of counsel authorized to represent defendants in this case. Therefore defendant County of

Alameda is required by its RFP rules and procedures to reassign the case to another attorney, who

must then become familiar with this case.

2. In addition, the County defendants have filed a motion to dismiss currently scheduled

to be heard on November 14, 2006. The parties agree that the motion should go forward as

scheduled so the issues raised by the motion can be resolved at an early date, and the scope of the

case can be more fully defined. The parties believe that their efforts to meet and confer regarding

relevant case management issues will be more fruitful after receiving the Court’s guidance following

the rulings on the proposed motions.

3. Mr. Wilson has conferred with both John L. Burris and Gayla B. Libet, attorneys

representing the plaintiffs, and plaintiffs’ counsel have no objections to the above Stipulation.

Dated: October _____, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET

By:

 Gayla B. Libet

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: October _____, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

By:

 John L. Burris

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:06-cv-04108-MJJ Document 21 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:06-cv-04108-MJJ Document 22 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 3 C06-04108 MJJ 

Dated: October _____, 2006 ERICKSON, BEASLEY, HEWITT & WILSON LLP

By:

 Todd Boley

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: October _____, 2006 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP

By:

 Edwin J. Wilson, Jr.

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:_________________

HONORABLE MARTIN J. JENKINS

Judge of the District Court

Q:\Alameda County\Patton 1458\Pld\Stip.Extension.100906.wpd

Case 3:06-cv-04108-MJJ Document 21 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 3 of 4

Initial Case Management Conference rescheduled for Tuesday, January 23, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. 10/17/2006

Case 3:06-cv-04108-MJJ Document 22 Filed 10/17/06 Page 3 of 3