Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00303/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00303-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Stipulation to Extend Time to File Responsive 

Pleading to Second Amended Complaint; Order - 1 - C-06-0303 EDL

Russell A. Robinson, State Bar #63937

Law Office of Russell A. Robinson

345 Grove Street, First Floor

San Francisco CA 94102

TEL: 415.255.0462

FAX: 415.431.4526

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GREG WILLIAMS

JOHN A. RUSSO, City Attorney – State Bar #129729

RANDOLPH W. HALL, Chief Assistant City Attorney – State Bar #080142

RACHEL WAGNER, Supervising Trial Attorney – State Bar #127246

INES FRAENKEL, Deputy City Attorney – State Bar #108113

One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 238-6512 Facsimile: (510) 238-6500

Email: ivfraenkel@oaklandcityattorney.org

X02850:392325

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF OAKLAND and CARTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREG WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND,

OAKLAND FIRE DEPARTMENT,

DEPUTY CHIEF RONALD K. CARTER,

and DOES 1-100,

Defendants.

Case No. C-06-0303 EDL

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their 

respective counsel and pending the Court’s approval, that the date for Defendants to file 

their responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint shall be extended to 

Case 3:06-cv-00303-EDL Document 32 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:06-cv-00303-EDL Document 35 Filed 12/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Stipulation to Extend Time to File Responsive 

Pleading to Second Amended Complaint; Order - 2 - C-06-0303 EDL

and including January 10, 2007. 

Good reason exists for this extension. The extension is not excessive and is 

warranted by the facts. The Second Amended Complaint was filed on December 8, 2006; 

defense counsel will be out of the office from December 18, 2006 through January 3, 

2007. 

Dated: December 15, 2006 Law Office of Russell A. Robinson, PC

________s/s_______________________

Attorney for Plaintiff

GREG WILLIAMS

Dated: December 15, 2006 JOHN A. RUSSO, City Attorney

RACHEL WAGNER, Supervising Trial Attorney 

INÉS VARGAS FRAENKEL, Deputy City Attorney 

_________s/s______________________

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF OAKLAND and CARTER

ORDER

Good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the responsive pleading to the Second 

Amended Complaint is extended through January 10, 2007. 

Dated: ______________________

_________________________________

HONORABLE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

U.S. Northern District Court Judge

Case 3:06-cv-00303-EDL Document 32 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 2 of 2

December 19, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:06-cv-00303-EDL Document 35 Filed 12/20/06 Page 2 of 2