Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00479/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00479-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAROLD WAYNE JONES, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

ROSANNE CAMPBELL, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-CV-00479 AWI SMS HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #22]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On December 7, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus be GRANTED

and the petition be DISMISSED with prejudice for Petitioner’s failure to comply with the one year

limitation period. This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained

notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within ten (10) court

days of the date of service of the order. Over ten (10) days have passed and no party has filed

objections.

Case 1:06-cv-00479-AWI -SMS Document 23 Filed 02/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued December 7, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00479-AWI -SMS Document 23 Filed 02/12/07 Page 2 of 2