Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06635/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06635-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEX ESPINOZA, CASE NO. CV-F-03-6635 REC DLB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 22),

DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE STATE

TO STATE A CLAIM, AND DIRECTING

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

vs.

STEVE RAMER, et.al.,

Defendants.

 /

 After his original complaint was dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief, on

September 12, 2005, plaintiff proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed an amended complaint

alleging civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On January 9, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which was

served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the recommendation

were to be filed within thirty days. The parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court

has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds

the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Case 1:03-cv-06635-REC-DLB Document 24 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS: 

1. The Findings and Recommendations, issued January 9, 2006, is adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

This dismissal is without leave to amend be granted because plaintiff was already given

the opportunity to file an amended compliant and was unable to cure the deficiencies

identified. 

3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06635-REC-DLB Document 24 Filed 02/21/06 Page 2 of 2