Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01407/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01407-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA MCMASTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. E. SPEARMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:10-cv-01407-AWI-SKO (PC)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE 

DAYS

(Doc. 106)

Plaintiff Dana McMaster, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 

filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 6, 2010. This action is 

proceeding on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed January 3, 2013, against Defendants 

Carlson, Garcia, Sedwick, Espitia, and Pease (“Defendants”) for failing to protect him, in violation 

of the Eighth Amendment, and against Defendant Carlson for retaliation, in violation of the First 

Amendment. The events giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims allegedly occurred between March 7, 

2009, and April 20, 2009, at Pleasant Valley State Prison in Coalinga, California.

Pursuant to the amended scheduling order, the deadline for the completion of all discovery 

is May 15, 2015. On May 14, 2015, Defendants filed a timely motion to compel Plaintiff’s 

deposition. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(d). Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is 

HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’

motion to compel within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Plaintiff is 

Case 1:10-cv-01407-AWI-SKO Document 107 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action, with 

prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 15, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01407-AWI-SKO Document 107 Filed 05/15/15 Page 2 of 2