Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-04167/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-04167-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Raymond G. Musgrove, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph M. Arpaio, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV05-4167-PHX-SRB

ORDER

Plaintiff, Raymond G. Musgrove, filed his Civil Rights Complaint on December 20,

2005. On January 9, 2006, this Court issued an order advising Plaintiff to complete and

return a service packet for Defendant by January 30, 2006. On June 5, 2006 the Court issued

an order to show cause giving Plaintiff until June 21, 2006 to show cause why this case

should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. On June 14, 2006 Plaintiff's copy of the

June 5, 2006 order was returned by the Post-Office with the notation "Return to Sender -

Released." 

On June 15 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation

recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to

prosecute.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

Case 2:05-cv-04167-SRB Document 9 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The

Court notes that on June 23, 2006 Plaintiff's copy of the Report and Recommendation was

also returned by the Post Office with the notation "Return to Sender - Released ." Plaintiff

has not filed a change of address with the Court.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case without prejudice for failure to

prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter Judgment accordingly.

DATED this 7th day of July, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-04167-SRB Document 9 Filed 07/10/06 Page 2 of 2