Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00290/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00290-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The court notes that in his application for an extension of time, Plaintiff indicated he was 1

in the process of retaining David E. Pipal as counsel. It is not clear from Plaintiff’s application whether

Mr. Pipal had actually agreed to represent him, and Mr. Pipal has not made any appearance in this action

to date. However, out of an abundance of caution, the court is serving a courtesy copy of this order on

Mr. Pipal. Unless and until Mr. Pipal makes an appearance in this matter, the court will not serve any

further courtesy copies of orders on him.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MARIANO AYALA GARCIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Defendant

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 10-0290 PVT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE;

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR

DEFENDANT TO FILE ANSWER; AND

ORDER CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

On May 10, 2010, the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s

motion to dismiss, and granting Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. On June 14, 2010, the

court granted Plaintiff’s application for an extension of time to file an amended complaint. The 1

court set July 23, 2010 as the deadline for Plaintiff to file any amended complaint. No amended

complaint has been filed. A Case Management Conference was held on August 24, 2010. Plaintiff

failed to appear for the Case Management Conference. Based on the foregoing, and the file herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than September 14, 2010, Plaintiff shall file a

Case 5:10-cv-00290-PVT Document 26 Filed 08/25/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

declaration showing cause why he failed to appear for the Case Management Conference. Failure to

show an adequate reason for the failure to appear may result in an order to show cause why the case

should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file its answer to Plaintiff’s original

complaint no later than September 14, 2010. While Plaintiff has not filed any amended complaint,

two causes of action remain which survived Defendant’s motion to dismiss. In its answer,

Defendant need not respond to the allegations of the first cause of action, which was dismissed by

this court’s prior order (see docket no. 19).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Case Management Conference is CONTINUED to

September 28, 2010. The parties shall file their Case Management Conference Statements no later

than September 21, 2010.

Dated: 8/24/10

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00290-PVT Document 26 Filed 08/25/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 3

Defense counsel automatically notified of this filing via the court’s Electronic Case Filing system.

copies mailed on 8/25/10 to:

Mariano Ayala Garcia

980 El Toro Drive

Hollister, CA 95023 

David E. Pipal, Esq.

Paxton & O’Brien Law Group, LLP

350 Fifth St.

Hollister, CA 95023

 /s/ Donna Kirchner 

 DONNA KIRCHNER

 Judicial Law Clerk

Case 5:10-cv-00290-PVT Document 26 Filed 08/25/10 Page 3 of 3