Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-02075/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-02075-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLINTON VALES,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. TARNOFF, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-02075-SKO PC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO INFORM COURT

OF CHANGE IN ADDRESS

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 20 DAYS

Plaintiff Clinton Vales (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 8, 2010, the Court issued

an order informing Plaintiff that this action was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. 

(Doc. #8.) The order was mailed to Plaintiff and was later returned to the Court as undeliverable

because Plaintiff was not in custody at the address in the Court’s file.

Under Local Rule 182(f), Plaintiff is required to inform the Court of any change of address. 

It appears that Plaintiff has failed to inform the Court of a change in his address. Accordingly,

Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within twenty (20) days of the date of service

of this order why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to inform the Court of the

change in his address.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 16, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

Case 1:09-cv-02075-SKO Document 9 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 1