Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-00331/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-00331-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1 

18cv331-BEN-LL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STONE BREWING CO., LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MILLERCOORS LLC, 

Defendant. 

 Case No.: 18cv331-BEN-LL 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

REPLY RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE 

PURSUANT TO ECF NO. 348 

[ECF No. 358] 

MILLERCOORS LLC, 

Counter Claimant, 

v. 

STONE BREWING CO., LLC, 

Counter Defendant. 

 On March 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed a request for leave to file a reply in a discovery 

dispute. ECF No. 358. The same day, Defendant filed a response in opposition to Plaintiff’s 

request. ECF No. 359. Plaintiff states that it requests “leave to file a reply in further support 

of its request for briefing on MillerCoors’s additional withholding of evidence and 

violation of discovery obligation.” ECF No. 358 at 2. The Court issued a briefing schedule 

for the underlying discovery dispute on March 10, 2020, which stated that “[n]o replies 

Case 3:18-cv-00331-BEN-MDD Document 362 Filed 03/31/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2 

18cv331-BEN-LL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

shall be filed unless otherwise ordered by the Court.” ECF No. 348 at 2. The Court finds 

no good cause to accept a reply. If the Court deems a reply is necessary, it will order one 

to be filed. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 31, 2020 

Case 3:18-cv-00331-BEN-MDD Document 362 Filed 03/31/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2