Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01743/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01743-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 895
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 05:552 Right to Privacy Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 It is unclear to the Court whether these documents include the six pages of redacted documents

already provided to plaintiff. Defendant shall include unredacted copies of these documents for the in

camera review. 

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN POULSEN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION,

Defendant. /

No. C 06-01743 SI

ORDER RE: IN CAMERA REVIEW OF

DOCUMENTS

After review of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court determines that an

in camera review of the documents at issue is necessary in order to assess defendant’s assertions of

exemptions and segregability of non-exempt material. At the May 26, 2006 hearing, both parties stated

they had no objection to an in camera review.

Accordingly, defendant shall lodge by June 9, 2006 unredacted copies of the following

documents (as described in the Suzuki Declarations): Documents 1-4, 8, and 10-15.1

 Plaintiff’s reply

states he does not challenge that Documents 5-7 and 9, as described in the Suzuki Declaration, are

properly exempted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 5, 2006 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01743-SI Document 29 Filed 06/05/06 Page 1 of 1