Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_19-cv-01132/USCOURTS-azd-2_19-cv-01132-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Isidro Sauceda,

Petitioner, 

v. 

David Shinn, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-19-01132-PHX-NVW (CDB)

ORDER

and

DENIAL OF CERTIFICATE OF 

APPEALABILITY AND IN FORMA 

PAUPERIS STATUS

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 

Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles (Doc. 12) regarding petitioner’s Petition for Writ of 

Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that 

the Petition be denied. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen 

days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 26 (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. Petitioner filed objections on April 27, 2020 (Doc.13).

The Court has considered the objections and reviewed the Report and 

Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that 

the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and 

Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the 

Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the meaning 

of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, 

the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”).

Case 2:19-cv-01132-NVW Document 14 Filed 04/29/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge (Doc. 12) is accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying 

Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 

1) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this case.

A request for a certificate of appealability will be denied because Petitioner has not 

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right about which reasonable 

jurists would disagree.

Dated: April 29, 2020.

Case 2:19-cv-01132-NVW Document 14 Filed 04/29/20 Page 2 of 2