Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-5_19-cv-00238/USCOURTS-ared-5_19-cv-00238-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

PINE BLUFF DIVISION

STEVEN E. ANDERSON PLAINTIFF

V. CASE NO. 5:19-CV-238-BSM-BD

ADAMS, et al. DEFENDANTS 

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

I. Procedure for Filing Objections

This Recommended Disposition (Recommendation) has been sent to Judge Brian 

S. Miller. Mr. Anderson may file objections to this Recommendation if he disagrees with 

its findings or conclusions. If objections are filed, they should be specific and should 

include the factual or legal basis for the objection. 

To be considered, objections must be received in the office of the Court Clerk 

within 14 days of this Recommendation. If no objections are filed, Judge Miller can adopt 

this Recommendation without independently reviewing the record. By not objecting, Mr. 

Anderson may waive the right to appeal questions of fact.

II. Discussion

Steven Anderson, formerly an inmate at the W.C. “Dub” Brassell Adult Detention 

Center, filed this civil rights lawsuit without the help of a lawyer. (Docket entry #1) Mail 

sent to Mr. Anderson from the Court was returned as “undeliverable,” with a notation that 

Mr. Anderson was “no longer at this facility.” (#3, #4) Mr. Anderson has failed to inform 

the Court of his current address, as required for parties who are not represented by 

counsel. See Local Rule 5.5.

Case 5:19-cv-00238-BSM Document 7 Filed 09/17/19 Page 1 of 2
2

In an August 15, 2019 Order, Mr. Anderson was directed to notify the Court of his 

current address within 30 days. (#5) In that order, the Court specifically cautioned Mr. 

Anderson that his claims could be dismissed if he failed to update his address. To date, he 

has failed to comply with the Court’s August 15 Order, and the time for responding has 

passed. 

III. Conclusion

The Court recommends that Mr. Anderson’s claims be DISMISSED, without 

prejudice, based on his failure to comply with the Court’s August 15 Order and his failure 

to prosecute this lawsuit. 

DATED this 17th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:19-cv-00238-BSM Document 7 Filed 09/17/19 Page 2 of 2