Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00856/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00856-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOMER TYRONE LEWIS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

KATHLEEN ALISON, et al.,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:12-cv-00856-LJO-BAM (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 

DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS 

(ECF No. 21, 22)

Plaintiff Homer Tyrone Lewis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 10, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 

this action proceed on Plaintiff’s third amended complaint against Defendants Alison, Adams, 

Junious, Denny, Parra and Garza in their individual capacities for retaliation in violation of the 

First Amendment; that Plaintiff’s claim for damages against Defendants in their official 

capacities be dismissed; that Plaintiff’s access to the courts and California Penal Code § 2601 

claims be dismissed; and that Plaintiff’s claim for declaratory relief be dismissed. The Findings 

and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections must be 

filed within thirty days after service. More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not 

filed any objections. 

///

///

Case 1:12-cv-00856-LJO-BAM Document 26 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 

a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, issued on December 10, 2013, are adopted

in full; 

2. This action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed on 

November 18, 2013, against Defendants Alison, Adams, Junious, Denny, Parra 

and Garza in their individual capacities.

3. Plaintiff’s claim for damages against Defendants in their official capacities is 

DISMISSED;

4. Plaintiff’s denial of access to the courts and California Penal Code § 2601 claims 

are DISMISSED; 

5. Plaintiff’s request for declaratory relief is DISMISSED; and 

6. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings 

consistent with this order. 

7.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 21, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8.

Case 1:12-cv-00856-LJO-BAM Document 26 Filed 01/21/14 Page 2 of 2