Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01829/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01829-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1829

RICHARD R. TISDALE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; 

UNITED STATES NAVY; NATIONAL AERONAUTICS SPACE 

ADMINISTRATION,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

OYSTER POINT SELF-SERVICE STORAGE; BANK OF AMERICA; 

HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK; UNITED STATES,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00305-HEH-RCY)

Submitted: December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1829 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/23/2019 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Richard R. Tisdale, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1829 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/23/2019 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Richard R. Tisdale appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil 

action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s informal

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Tisdale’s informal brief does not challenge the basis 

for the district court’s disposition, Tisdale has forfeited appellate review of the court’s 

order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is 

an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues 

preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1829 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/23/2019 Pg: 3 of 3