Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03815/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03815-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO OSC

C 06-3815-JSW 1

KEVIN V. RYAN, CSBN 118321

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143

Assistant United States Attorney

Chief, Civil Division

EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6915

FAX: (415) 436-6927

Attorneys for Respondents

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ARMINDA ARIAS,

Petitioner,

v.

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney

General of the United States; DAVID

STILL, Acting District Director, San

Francisco Office, U.S. Bureau of

Citizenship and Immigration Services, 

Respondents.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-06-3815-JSW

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE

FOR RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Petitioner, by and through her attorney of record, and respondents, by and through their

attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to the following:

1. The petitioner filed and served a petition for writ of mandamus on June 19, 2006, seeking

an order from the Court directing the respondents to adjudicate an application for adjustment of

status.

2. On June 21, 2006, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause (OSC) directing the

respondents to show cause on or before July 14, 2006, why the writ should not be granted.

3. Because the respondents had not filed any responsive pleading to the petition for writ of

mandamus or otherwise entered an appearance on the Court’s Electronic Filing System (ECF), the

Case 3:06-cv-03815-JSW Document 5 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cv-03815-JSW Document 6 Filed 07/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 I, Edward A. Olsen, attest that both Frank Sprouls and I have signed this stipulation. 1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO OSC

C 06-3815-JSW 2

respondents were not notified via the ECF or otherwise of the OSC.

4. The respondents were notified of the Court’s OSC on Friday, July 21, 2006, when an

employee of the petitioner’s law office notified counsel for the respondents by telephone of the

existence of the Order to Show Cause and notified counsel for the respondents that petitioner’s

counsel was out of the office that day, but would return on Monday, July 24, 2006. Petitioner’s

counsel contacted the respondents’ counsel on Monday, July 24, 2006, to discuss a briefing

schedule.

5. In light of the fact that counsel for the respondents has only recently learned of the OSC, the

parties hereby agree to the following schedule, subject to approval by the Court.

Respondents’ Response to the OSC due: August 3, 2006

Petitioner’s Reply: August 11, 2006

Hearing: August 18, 2006, at 9:00 a.m.

Date: July 25, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

/s/

EDWARD A. OLSEN1

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Respondents

Date: July 25, 2006 /s/

FRANK P. SPROULS

Attorneys for Petitioner

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-03815-JSW Document 5 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 2 of 2

July 26, 2006

10

Case 3:06-cv-03815-JSW Document 6 Filed 07/26/06 Page 2 of 2