Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05749/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05749-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:405 Fair Housing Act

---

UNITED STATES ÐISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FA.IR HOUSING OF MARIN et al.

Plaintif(s),

cAsE NO. C-0És749 EMC

STTPT.JLATION AD IPROPOSED]

ORDER SEIÆCTING ADR PROCESS

v.

RAMONAFLOOD etal.

Defendan(s).

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R ,16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

,/ EarlyNzutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

Mediation (ADR L.R.6)

(Note: Parties who belíeve that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform of .ADR, must participate in an

ADR phone conference and may notfi.le this þrm- Thqr must insteadrth ø Notice of Needþr

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule l6-8 and ADRL.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

Private ADRQtlease identify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by

{ the presumptive deadline (The deadline ß 90 daysfrom the date of the order

referring the case to an,LDR process unless otherwise ordered. )

v for Plaintiff

Dated: 3/27/07 t¿¿ tt-*lt¡a,u-oL Åfffqj*^"

Att"*"y f"t D"fttd"tt 

--VCase 3:06-cv-05749-EMC Document 24 Filed 03/27/2007 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-05749-EMC Document 26 Filed 03/28/07 Page 1 of 4
Illr{ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FAIR HOUSING OF MARIN et al.

CASENO. C-06-574eEMC

Plaintiff(s),

v. STIPIJLATIONAND IPROPOSED]

RAMoNAFLooDetal. ORDER SELECTING ADRPROCESS

Defendant(s).

I

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

Non-binding Arbitr¿tion (ADR L.R. 4)

{ EarlyNeutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADRL.R. 5)

Mediation (ADRL.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conferencewith a MagistrateJudge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any otherform of ADR, mßt partìcipate ín an

ADR phone conference and may notfrle thísþrm. They must insteadfile a Notice of Needfor

ADR Phone Conference. See Ctvil Local Rule 16-8 ønd ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

Private ADRQtlease identify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session b¡r

{ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

refening the case to an ADR process unless otherwße ordered. )

other requested deadline

Dated: 3/27107

Attornev forPlaintiff

- rt#,

Attorneyïor Defendant

Dated: 3127/07

Case 3:06-cv-05749-EMC Document 24 Filed 03/27/2007 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-05749-EMC Document 26 Filed 03/28/07 Page 2 of 4
filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket

Event, e.9., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."

IPROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuanto the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

Non-binding Arbitration

./ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)

Mediation

Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session

,/ 90 days from the date of this order.

other

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05749-EMC Document 24 Filed 03/27/2007 Page 3 of 4

March 28, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:06-cv-05749-EMC Document 26 Filed 03/28/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

I

I

1 0

1 1

1 2

1 3

1 4

1 5

1 6

1 7

1 8

1 9

20

2 1

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to the within action. My business

address is 8205 Pescadero Road, Loma Mar, California 94021.

On March 27,2007, I served a true and correct copy of the following

document(s):

sTrpuLATtoN AND fpROpOSEDI ORDER SELECT|NG ADR

PROCESS

upon the following person(s):

Mr. Thomas H. Carlson, Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, 311 California Street,

San Francisco, CA 94104; and

Mr. Scott Chang, Relman & Dane PLLC, 1225 19th Street NW, Suite 600,

Washington, DC 20036

I certify that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at

whose direction the service was made.

Executed on March 27,2007. at Loma Mar. California.

BY HAND DELIVERY: By causing such document(s) to be delivered by

hand to the above person(s) at the address(es) set forth above.

BY MAIL: By placing a copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope, with

postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Loma Mar,

California. addressed as set forth above.

XX BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: By transmitting the above document(s) tothe

email addresses of the persons designated above, or by electronically filing

the documents on the Court's ECF svstem.

BY THIRD-PARTY COMMERCTAL CARRTER (OVERN|GHT DELIVERy):

By delivering acopy thereof to a third-party commercial carrier, addressed

as set forth above, for delivery on the next business dav.

BY FACSIMILE: By transmitting the above document(s) to the facsimile

number(s) of the addressee(s) desiqnated above.

Liza Cristol-Deman

Case 3:06-cv-05749-EMC Document 24 Filed 03/27/2007 Page 4 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-05749-EMC Document 26 Filed 03/28/07 Page 4 of 4