Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05421/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05421-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER, S.A.; 

CÉLINE, S.A.; and CHRISTIAN 

DIOR, S.A.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

GLAMORA BY SADIA; SADIA 

BARRAMEDA; et al.,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV 14-05421 SC

ORDER UNSEALING CASE

On March 18, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiffs in this matter 

to show cause why this case should remain sealed. The Court also 

offered Defendants an opportunity to explain their support of, or 

opposition to, the Court's maintenance of this litigation under 

seal. See ECF No. 34 ("Show Cause Order"). The Court issued that 

order in light of the strong public policy concerns in favor of 

public access to court records and because it appears to the Court 

that the reasons for sealing this case no longer apply. See id.

(citing Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 

(9th Cir. 2006) ("Courts have recognized a 'general right to 

Case 5:14-cv-05421-BLF Document 39 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial 

records and documents.'").

Plaintiffs timely responded to the order to show cause with 

statement explaining that they do not oppose the unsealing of this 

case. See ECF No. 38. The deadline for Defendants to respond was 

April 1, 2015, but they have declined to do so. In light of the 

strong presumption in favor of public access to judicial records 

and the lack of opposition from any party, the Court finds that

this case should be unsealed. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the 

clerk to unseal this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:14-cv-05421-BLF Document 39 Filed 04/15/15 Page 2 of 2