Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04227/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04227-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ECOPY, INC.,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 08-4227 JSW (MEJ)

Consolidated with C 08-4942 JSW (MEJ)

ORDER RE: I.R.I.S’ REQUEST FOR

PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION OF

DISCOVERY ORDER (DKT. #149)

The Court is in receipt of I.R.I.S.’s Request for Partial Reconsideration of this Court’s April

1, 2010 Order Re: Joint Discovery Dispute Letter. (Dkt. #149.) In that Order, the Court stated as

follows: “[h]owever, Plaintiff’s offer to ‘pay for a server and necessary hardware onto which the

source code could be copied and maintained at the office of [Plaintiff’s] U.S. outside counsel[,]’ is

well-taken.” (Order 2:16-18, Dkt. #145.) I.R.I.S.’s Request brings to the Court’s attention that the

use of the term “Plaintiff’s” in brackets appears to order that I.R.I.S.’s source code be produced at

counsel for Nuance’s office, rather than counsel for I.R.I.S.’s office. 

The Court hereby amends it April 1, 2010 Order. Plaintiff Nuance Communications, Inc. is

ORDERED to pay for a server and necessary hardware onto which the relevant source code shall be

copied and maintained at the office of I.R.I.S.’ U.S. outside counsel. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 8, 2010

_______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-04227-JSW Document 151 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 1