Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-02889/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-02889-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 09-CV-02889-JW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Eric H. Gibbs (State Bar No. 178658) 

ehg@girardgibbs.com 

Dylan Hughes (State Bar No. 209113) 

dsh@girardgibbs.com 

Geoffrey A. Munroe (State Bar No. 228590) 

gam@girardgibbs.com 

GIRARD GIBBS LLP

601 California Street, 14th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94108 

Telephone: (415) 981-4800 

Facsimile: (415) 981-4846 

Interim Class Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re Intel Laptop Litigation Case No. 09-CV-02889-JW (PVT) 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO 

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND 

AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge James Ware

4/13/2010

Case 5:09-cv-02889-JW Document 74 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 09-CV-02889-JW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs filed their Amended Consolidated Complaint on January 15, 2010; 

WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs now seek to file a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint to add 

two additional plaintiffs; 

WHEREAS, without waiver of any defenses to any claims asserted therein, the Defendants Intel 

Corporation and Business Applications Performance Corporation have no objection to the filing of the 

Second Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, the parties are unaware of any events or deadlines fixed by the Court that would be 

affected by the proposed filing of the Second Amended Consolidated Complaint, 

NOW THEREFORE, the Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate that Plaintiffs be granted 

leave to file a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

15(a)(2). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

DATED: April 5, 2010 By: /s Eric H. Gibbs 

GIRARD GIBBS LLP

Interim Class Counsel 

DATED: April 5, 2010 By: /s Philip A. Leider 

PERKINS COIE LLP 

Attorney for Defendant Intel Corporation

DATED: April 5, 2010 By: /s Perry J. Narancic 

NARANCIC & KATZMAN, PC 

Attorney for Defendant Business Applications 

Performance Corporation 

IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED:

On or before April 19, 2010, Plaintiffs shall file its Second Amended Complaint as a separate docket 

entry. 

Dated: April 13, 2010 ___________________________________ 

 United States District Judge

Case 5:09-cv-02889-JW Document 74 Filed 04/13/10 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

CASE NO. 09-CV-02889-JW

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on April 5, 2010, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with the 

clerk of court for the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, using the electronic case files 

system of the court: 

1. JOINT STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND 

AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT 

 The electronic case files system sent a "Notice of Electronic Filing" to Counsel of record who are 

registered e-filers and have consented to accept this Notice as service of this document by electronic 

means. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the above 

is true and correct. 

 Executed on April 5, 2010, at San Francisco, California. 

 /s/ Angela L. Eure 

Case 5:09-cv-02889-JW Document 74 Filed 04/13/10 Page 3 of 3