Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-02131/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-02131-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAVID BECK,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C-05-2131 PVT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this matter on May 24, 2005. On June 2, 2005, the court

granted Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. On October 17, 2005,

Defendant filed an Answer to the Complaint in this matter.1 Civil Local Rule 16-5 states:

"Within 30 days of receipt of defendant's answer, plaintiff must file a motion for summary

judgment pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2 and FRCivP 56." As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has

not filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. In fact, Plaintiff has not filed anything since May 24,

2005.

Based on the court's review of the file in this matter, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than June 30, 2006, Plaintiff file a declaration

Case 5:05-cv-02131-JW Document 13 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

showing cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

Dated: June 9, 2006

____________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:05-cv-02131-JW Document 13 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 2