Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00951/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00951-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 1

 Plaintiff refiled his objections on August 12, 2005.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT YOUNG,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-0951 FCD JFM P

vs.

PETER BRESLER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 8, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. On August 3, 2005, this

court adopted in full the findings and recommendations in an order stating, inter alia, that neither

party had filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In fact, plaintiff filed objections

to the findings and recommendations on July 29, 2005.1 Good cause appearing, the August 3,

2005 order will be vacated.

Case 2:03-cv-00951-FCD-JFM Document 60 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case, including the objections filed by

plaintiff on July 29, 2005. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court’s August 3, 2005 order is vacated;

2. The findings and recommendations filed July 8, 2005, are adopted in full; and

3. Plaintiff’s claim against defendant Robertson is dismissed from this action. 

DATED:August 22, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-00951-FCD-JFM Document 60 Filed 08/23/05 Page 2 of 2