Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01267/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01267-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

Sanford v. Union 76, et al., Case No. CIV.S 05-1267 DFL JFM 

Stipulation to Amend the Scheduling Order 

- 1 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

James Sanford, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Bobby Anand and Amarjeet Kaur 

Anand dba Union 76, et al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CIV.S 05-1267 DFL JFM 

Stipulation to Amend the 

Scheduling Order and Order 

Thereon 

Complaint Filed: June 20, 2005 

Pretrial Conference: March 23, 2006 

WHEREAS, the parties were served with the Status (Pre-trial 

Scheduling) Order (hereinafter “Scheduling Order) on September 19, 2005 in 

this matter; 

WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order provides that on or before October 

6, 2006, each party shall comply with the disclosure provisions as set forth in 

Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereinafter 

“FRCP”); 

Lynn Hubbard, III, SBN 69773 

Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV, SBN 212970 

Law Offices of Lynn Hubbard 

12 Williamsburg Lane 

Chico, CA 95926 

Telephone: (530) 895-3252 

Facsimile: (530) 894-8244 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:05-cv-01267-DFL -JFM Document 27 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 3
Sanford v. Union 76, et al., Case No. CIV.S 05-1267 DFL JFM 

Stipulation to Amend the Scheduling Order 

- 2 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order provides that on or before October 

20, 2006, each party shall comply with the supplemental disclosures 

regarding contradictory or rebuttal evidence under FRCP 26(a)(2)(C); 

WHEREAS, the parties are currently engaged in settlement 

negotiations and are unable to coordinate a date for the Rule 34 Site 

Inspection until late September and plaintiff’s expert will not have sufficient 

time to prepare his report. Therefore, the parties seek to extend the dates for 

disclosures under FRCP 26(a)(2)(A), (B), and (C). 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the 

parties that the Scheduling Order be amended as follows: 

1. On or before November 6, 2006 each party shall comply with the 

disclosure provisions set forth in FRCP 26(a)(2)(A) and (B); 

2. On or before November 20, 2006 each party shall comply with 

the supplemental disclosure provisions set forth in FRCP 26(a)(2)(C). 

Dated: August 7, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD 

 /s/ Lynn Hubbard, Esquire 

 LYNN HUBBARD, III 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: August 3, 2006 PORTER SCOTT WEIBERG & DELEHANT 

 /s/ Molly Ryan, Esquire 

 MOLLY M. RYAN 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

BOBBY ANAND AND AMARJEET KAUR 

ANAND 

Case 2:05-cv-01267-DFL -JFM Document 27 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 3
Sanford v. Union 76, et al., Case No. CIV.S 05-1267 DFL JFM 

Stipulation to Amend the Scheduling Order 

- 3 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: August 7, 2006 SPECTER & WILLOUGHBY, LP 

 /s/ Michael Artinian, Esquire 

 MICHAEL H. ARTINIAN 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY 

Order

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

that: 

1. On or before November 6, 2006 each party shall comply with the 

disclosure provisions set forth in FRCP 26(a)(2)(A) and (B); 

2. On or before November 20, 2006 each party shall comply with 

the supplemental disclosure provisions set forth in FRCP 26(a)(2)(C). 

Dated: 8/9/2006 

______________________________ 

DAVID F. LEVI 

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01267-DFL -JFM Document 27 Filed 08/10/06 Page 3 of 3