Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05659/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05659-77/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP.

C 09-05659 WHA LB

Yitai Hu (SBN 248085)

yitai.hu@alston.com

Ryan W. Koppelman (SBN 290704)

ryan.koppelman@alston.com

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1950 University Avenue

5th Floor

East Palo Alto, CA 94303

Tel.: 650-838-2026

Fax: 650-838-2001

Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963)

elizabeth.rader@alston.com

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

The Atlantic Building

950 F Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004-1404

Tel.: 202-239-3300

Fax: 202-239-3333

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION

Steven M. Levitan (SBN 148716)

steve.levitan@hoganlovells.com

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100

Menlo Park, California 94025

Tel: (650) 463-4000

Fax: (650) 463-4199

Christian E. Mammen (SBN 188454)

chris.mammen@hoganlovells.com

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

3 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94111

Tel: (415) 374-2300

Fax: (415) 374-2499

Edward C. Kwok (SBN 144302)

(ekwok@vlplawgroup.com)

VLP Law Group LLP

19900 Price Avenue

Cupertino, CA 95014

Tel: (408) 620-5501

Attorneys for Defendant

uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,

AMANDA DAI, AND JACKY LEE,

Defendants.

Case No. C 09-05659 WHA LB

JOINT STIPULATION AND

PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING

SETTLEMENT

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 582 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 583 Filed 11/19/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP.

C 09-05659 WHA LB

Counsel for Plaintiff Richtek Technology Corporation and counsel for Defendant uPI

Semiconductor Corporation hereby submit this stipulation and proposed order.

1. The parties earlier today signed and executed a written settlement agreement.

Under the settlement, a contingency must be satisfied within 3 business days of the agreement’s

execution, and then the case will be dismissed promptly thereafter. Accordingly, per the

agreement, the case will be dismissed in advance of the Pretrial Conference set for November 30th

at 2:00 p.m. (and very likely next week).

2. The parties promptly notified the Court of this earlier today be joint letter (Dkt.

No. 581), as provided for in paragraph 37 of the Court’s January 11, 2016 Guidelines for Trial

and Pretrial Conference in Civil Jury Cases, and pursuant to the Court’s instructions at

yesterday’s summary judgment hearing.

3. The parties followed up today by contacting Chambers and was advised to file a

written pleading, which parties are now presenting in the form of this stipulation and proposed

order.

Now therefore, given the signed settlement and forthcoming dismissal, to avoid

unnecessary work, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an order

continuing all upcoming deadlines and events, taking them off calendar, including the deadlines

set in connection with next Wednesday’s (11/23/16) extensive pretrial filings.

Dated: November 18, 2016

Respectfully submitted,

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

By: /s/Ryan W. Koppelman

Ryan W. Koppelman

Attorneys for Plaintiff Richtek Technology

Corporation

Respectfully submitted,

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

By: /s/Steven M. Levitan

Steven M. Levitan

Attorneys for Defendant uPI Semiconductor

Corporation

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 582 Filed 11/18/16 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 583 Filed 11/19/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP.

C 09-05659 WHA LB

Filer’s Attestation

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of

perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all parties.

Alston & Bird LLP

/s/ Ryan W. Koppelman

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________, 2016 ___________________________________

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 582 Filed 11/18/16 Page 3 of 3 Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 583 Filed 11/19/16 Page 3 of 3