Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00762/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00762-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 490
Nature of Suit: Cable/ Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 47:553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CAL CITY POST NO. 476, THE )

AMERICAN LEGION, DEPARTMENT )

OF CALIFORNIA, )

)

)

Defendants. )

 ) 

Case No.: 1:10-cv-00762 AWI JLT

ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

(Doc. 7)

Before the Court is the request of the Plaintiff to continue the scheduling conference,

currently set on August 25, 2010, for 30 days. (Doc. 7) In support, Plaintiff asserts that despite

“diligent attempts” to serve the defendant, it has been unable to do so.1

On April 30, 2010, the Court issued its “Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling

Conference.” That Order set forth the obligations of counsel related to the Scheduling

Conference. The Order reads,

The Court notes that the complaint was filed nearly four months ago. Counsel is reminded that Plaintiff is

1

obligated to serve the summons and complaint within 120 days according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m)

or to show good cause for its failure to do so.

1

Case 1:10-cv-00762-AWI-JLT Document 10 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

“The Court is unable to conduct a scheduling conference until defendants have

been served with the summons and complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff(s) shall

diligently pursue service of summons and complaint and dismiss those defendants

against whom plaintiff(s) will not pursue claims.”

(Doc. 4 at 1) Because the Court cannot conduct a scheduling conference until the defendant has

been served, the Court has no choice but to continue the conference.

Therefore the Court ORDERS:

1. The Scheduling Conference currently set on August 25, 2010, will be continued to

October 7, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.;

2. Plaintiff is ordered to serve a copy of this Order on the defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 12, 2010 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

9j7khi UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

2

Case 1:10-cv-00762-AWI-JLT Document 10 Filed 08/17/10 Page 2 of 2