Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00850/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00850-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT HACKWORTH,

Plaintiff,

v.

P. RANGEL,

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-850-AWI-MJS (PC)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

DISCOVERY

(ECF No. 60)

Plaintiff Robert Hackworth (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion Requesting the Court to Order (Old Corcoran

Prison) to Trun [sic] the Recorded Interview over to the Court that took place between

Plaintiff and Battles.” (ECF No. 60.) Plaintiff appears to be asking the Court to compel

Defendant to produce certain evidence relevant to this case. 

On November 10, 2009, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order that

stated: “The parties are advised that the deadline for the completion of all discovery,

including filing motions to compel, shall be 7/10/2010.” (ECF No. 44 ¶ 7.) Plaintiff signed

the instant motion on September 30, 2010, well after the discovery deadline had passed.

(ECF No. 60.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion is untimely.

For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 25, 2010 /s/Michael J. Seng 

ci4d6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00850-BAM Document 62 Filed 10/26/10 Page 1 of 1