Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03649/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03649-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

2 Pursuant to theSan Jose Division’s Standing Order Regarding Case Management in Civil

Cases, “All disclosure or discovery disputes in cases assigned to district judges are referred to the

assigned magistrate judge for determination pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a).”

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES dba

INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GOOGLE, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 05-3649 JW PVT

ORDER RE LETTER DATED JULY 18,

2006 FROM PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL

TO COURT

The court is in receipt of a letter dated July 18, 2006 from Plaintiff’s counsel to Judge Ware.1

Because the letter addresses a discovery dispute, it was forwarded to the assigned referral judge,

Magistrate Judge Trumbull.2 Having reviewed the letter,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any request for judicial relief in connection with discovery

disputes must be made pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7 (and if necessary requests to shorten time

pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6). Informal letters to the court complaining about an opposing party’s

failure to timely produce documents is not an appropriate vehicle for obtaining such relief, and will

not be acted on by the court.

Dated: 7/20/06

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW Document 65 Filed 07/21/06 Page 1 of 1