Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00180/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00180-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PIERRE RIZZO,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. DIAZ, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-180-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(ECF No. 11)

Plaintiff Pierre Rizzo (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 29, 2010, the

Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Court Order asking for the Court’s permission to file an

amended complaint. Plaintiff was ordered to file his amended complaint by August 15,

2010.

The Court has yet to receive an amended complaint from Plaintiff. Accordingly,

Plaintiff is ordered to show cause by September 15, 2010 why his case should not be

dismissed for failure to prosecute and obey a court order. If Plaintiff does not wish to

amend his complaint, he should so notify the Court, and the Court will proceed on his initial

Complaint filed February 4, 2010. However, failure to respond to this Order may result in

dismissal of the above-captioned action for failure to prosecute and obey a court order.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 23, 2010 /s/Michael J. Seng 

ci4d6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00180-LJO-MJS Document 17 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 1