Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00847/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00847-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOLOMON FARR, No. CIV.S-05-0847 GEB DAD PS

Plaintiff,

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding in this action pro se, initiated this

action by filing an application to proceed in forma pauperis on

October 4, 2004. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge by Local Rule 72-302(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1).

By order filed April 29, 2005, plaintiff’s application to

proceed in forma pauperis was granted and the Clerk of the Court was

directed to file plaintiff’s complaint and open this matter as a civil

action. In addition, plaintiff was directed to submit the necessary

materials for service to the United States Marshal within thirty days. 

Case 2:05-cv-00847-GEB-DAD Document 10 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1 It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court

apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule

83-182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is

fully effective. 

2

Plaintiff was properly served with the April 29, 2005, order

both at the address listed on his application to proceed in forma

pauperis and the address listed on his complaint. The copy of the

order served on the former address was returned as undeliverable on

May 6, 2005.1 The copy served on the address listed on the complaint

has not been returned, but this second copy was served over thirty

days ago and plaintiff has not responded to the order.

Accordingly, plaintiff having failed to submit the necessary

materials for service to the United States Marshal as directed, the

court HEREBY RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See L.R. 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to serve these

findings and recommendations on both addresses for plaintiff referred

to herein.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the

United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being

served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be

captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00847-GEB-DAD Document 10 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.

1991).

DATED: September 8, 2005.

DAD:th

ddad1/orders.prose/farr0847.f&r.dism.2

Case 2:05-cv-00847-GEB-DAD Document 10 Filed 09/09/05 Page 3 of 3