Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01563/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01563-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

JIMMY MAGEE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CHAVEZ, et. al., )

) 

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CASE NO.1:05-CV-1563-OWW DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM 285 FORMS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights act

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on October 5, 2006. The court

has screened Plaintiff’s amended compliant against Defendants for excessive use of force in violation

of the Eighth Amendment. The complaint appears to state cognizable claims for relief for excessive

force against Defendant Chavez and Simpson. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for Defendants Chavez and Simpson.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff two (2) USM-285 forms, two (2) summons,

a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

amended complaint filed October 5, 2006.

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

Case 1:05-cv-01563-OWW -DLB Document 11 Filed 05/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

Court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Three (3) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed October 5, 2006.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 8, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01563-OWW -DLB Document 11 Filed 05/08/07 Page 2 of 2