Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05634/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05634-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Case No. 3:07-cv-05634-CRB

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER 

AIR TRANSPORTATION 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS 

File No. 3:07-cv-05634-CRB 

MDL No. 1913 

Assigned to Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

BRIEFING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

1. The schedule for the responses of defendants Air France, Air New Zealand, All Nippon 

Airways, British Airways, Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd., China Airlines, Ltd., Deutsche 

Lufthansa AG, Swiss International Air Lines Ltd., EVA Airways, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, 

Malaysia Airlines, Philippine Airlines, Qantas Airways, SAS AB, Singapore Airlines Ltd., 

Thai Airways International and Vietnam Airways to the CAC, and related briefing, is as 

follows: 

November 17, 2009 Last day for defendants to file motions to dismiss and briefs 

in support thereof (or Answers to the CAC). 

January 19, 2010 Last day for plaintiffs to file briefs in opposition to 

defendants’ motions to dismiss. 

 February 19, 2010 Last day for defendants to file reply briefs to plaintiffs’ 

 opposition briefs. 

2. The page limits for briefing on the above-listed defendants’ motions to dismiss are as 

follows: 

a. Defendants intend to file a joint brief on issues common to all defendants, 

such joint brief not to exceed 50 pages; plaintiffs may file a brief in 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 238 Filed 09/18/09 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Case No. 3:07-cv-05634-CRB

opposition to defendants’ joint brief not to exceed 50 pages; defendants 

may file a reply brief to plaintiffs’ opposition to the joint brief not to 

exceed 25 pages. 

b. Defendants may file a brief or briefs in addition to the aforementioned 

joint brief, on issues common to more than one but less than all 

defendants, any such brief(s) not to exceed 20 pages; plaintiffs may file 

brief(s) in opposition to such additional brief(s) not to exceed 20 pages; 

defendants may file reply brief(s) not to exceed 10 pages. 

c. Any individual defendant may file a separate brief on issues unique to that 

defendant, not to exceed 10 pages; plaintiffs may file brief(s) in 

opposition to any such brief(s) not to exceed 10 pages; defendants may 

file reply brief(s) not to exceed 5 pages. 

Dated: ___________ , 2009 ______________________________ 

 CHARLES R. BREYER 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Sept. 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 238 Filed 09/18/09 Page 2 of 2