Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-00443/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-00443-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Bottom Line Recoveries, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Lockheed Martin Corp., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 14-443-PHX-JAT

ORDER

“Inquiring whether the court has jurisdiction is a federal judge’s first duty in every

case.” Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, L.L.C., 350 F.3d 691, 693 (7th

Cir. 2003). In this case, the complaint fails to sufficiently plead jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1332; Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, L.P., 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006)

(discussing the citizenship of a limited liability company); see also CV 08-692-PHX-JAT

(Doc. 13); CV 11-1831-PHX-JAT (Doc. 27); CV 11-2038-PHX-JAT (Doc. 11); CV 08-

1620-PHX-JAT (Doc. 17). 

Accordingly,

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:14-cv-00443-JAT Document 22 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED that by May 7, 2014, Plaintiff shall file a supplement to the

complaint properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction, or this case will be dismissed

without prejudice for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction.

DATED this 22nd day of April, 2014.

Case 2:14-cv-00443-JAT Document 22 Filed 04/22/14 Page 2 of 2