Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03705/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03705-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME FOR ADR COMPLIANCE AND TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case # C-05-3705 MHP

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

SHELDON R. MEYER (SBN 063491) (Email: srm@fdml.com)

THOMAS A WARD (SBN 160659) (Email: taw@fdml.com)

MICHAEL L. ROBBINS (SBN 224087) (Email: mrobbins@fdml.com)

FLIESLER MEYER LLP

Four Embarcadero Center, Fourth Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 362-3800

Facsimile (415) 362-2928

Attorneys for Plaintiff Unuson Corporation

STEPHEN N. HOLLMAN (SBN 055219) (Email: shollman@bestintechnologylaw.com)

Business & Technology Law Group

160 W. Santa Clara Street, Suite 1050

San Jose, California 95113

Telephone: (408) 282-1949

Facsimile: (408) 275-9930

Attorneys for Defendant Built Entertainment Group, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNUSON CORPORATION, a California 

Corporation; 

Plaintiff,

vs.

Built ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., a 

California Corporation; and DOES 1-10, 

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 05-3705 MHP

 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO 

ENLARGE TIME FOR ADR 

COMPLIANCE AND TO CONTINUE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case 3:05-cv-03705-MHP Document 38 Filed 05/10/06 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME FOR ADR COMPLIANCE AND TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case # C-05-3705 MHP

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Plaintiff, Unuson Corporation (“Unuson”), and Defendant, Built Entertainment Group (“Built”), 

acting pursuant to the Court’s Civil Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2(e), stipulate (i) that the time for 

satisfaction of the ADR requirement in this case is about to extend beyond the ninety (90) day 

requirement set forth in ADR Local Rule 6-4(b) following the February 17, 2006 referral by the Court of 

this case to mediation administered by JAMS (the “Mediation”), and that the time for satisfaction of the 

ADR requirement in this case should be enlarged to and through June 16, 2006; and (ii) to continue the 

date of the Case Management Conference now calendared for May 22, 2006 at 3:00 p.m. to Monday, 

June 26, 2006 at 3:00 p.m. Accordingly, the parties would submit a Case Management Conference 

Statement on or before June 19, 2006.

FACTS

The first session of the Mediation was held on March 17, 2006 in San Francisco, and the second 

session of the Mediation was held on April 24, 2006 in San Jose. The Mediation is ongoing and may not 

be completed within the ninety period prescribed by ADR Local Rule 6-4(b). The parties are continuing 

their communications, and the mediator has consented to continuing her attempts to facilitate a 

resolution of this case.

The parties believe that an enlargement of time for satisfaction of the ADR requirement in this 

case to and through June 16, 2006 will permit the parties and the mediator to continue in their efforts to 

reach a settlement of their claims, or, in the alternative, to prepare for and appear at a re-calendared Case 

Management Conference. 

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, Unuson and Built request that the Court issue an order enlarging the date 

for ADR compliance in this case to and include June 16, 2006 continuing the date of the Case 

Management Conference now calendared for May 15, 2006 to June 26, 2006.

Case 3:05-cv-03705-MHP Document 38 Filed 05/10/06 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME FOR ADR COMPLIANCE AND TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case # C-05-3705 MHP

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Respectfully submitted, this 8th day of May, 2006.

/s/ Sheldon R. Meyer digitally signed/Stephen N. Hollman

Sheldon R. Meyer, Esq. Stephen N. Hollman, Esq.

Fliesler Meyer LLP Business & Technology Law Group

Four Embarcadero Center, 4th Floor 160 W. Santa Clara Street, Ste. 1050

San Francisco, California 94111 San Jose, California 95113

(415) 362-3800 (408) 282-1949

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant

Unuson Corporation Built Entertainment Group, Inc.

After consideration of the foregoing Stipulation, the reasons therefor, and all other matters 

presented to this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (i) the time for satisfaction of the ADR 

requirement in this case be extended to and through June 16, 2006; and (ii) the Case Management 

Conference, which is now calendared for Monday, May 15, 2006 at 3:00 p.m., be continued to Monday, 

June 26, 2006, at 3:00 p.m.

Dated: ________________________

_____________________________________

HONORABLE MARILYN HALL PATEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

May 9, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:05-cv-03705-MHP Document 38 Filed 05/10/06 Page 3 of 3