Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02175/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02175-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

Case No. C:06-2175-SI

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John M. Farrell (#99649) 

farrell@fr.com 

Shelley K. Mack (#209596) 

mack@fr.com 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 

Redwood City, CA 94063 

Tel.: 650-839-5070 

Fax: 650-839-5071 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaim Plaintiffs 

GESTURETEK, INC. and 

VERY VIVID, INC. 

Kurt M. Kjelland (#172076) 

kurt.kjelland@hellerehrman.com 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

4350 La Jolla Village Drive, 7th Floor 

San Diego, CA 92122 

Tel.: 858-450-8400 

Fax: 858-450-8499 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

REACTRIX SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

REACTRIX SYSTEMS, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GESTURETEK, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. C:06-2175-SI 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

THEREON 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Reactrix Systems, Inc. (“Reactrix”), Defendant and 

Counterclaim Plaintiff GestureTek, Inc. (“GestureTek”) and Counterclaim Plaintiff Very Vivid, 

Inc. (“Very Vivid”) hereby stipulate as follows: 

Case 3:06-cv-02175-SI Document 24 Filed 01/30/2007 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-02175-SI Document 25 Filed 02/01/07 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Reactrix, GestureTek and Very Vivid have resolved the issues arising from the 

above-titled action and have entered into a confidential settlement agreement regarding all of 

Reactrix’s claims and GestureTek and Very Vivid’s counterclaims. 

2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) and 41(c), Reactrix, GestureTek, and 

Very Vivid hereby agree to dismiss without prejudice this action, with each party to bear its own 

litigation costs, attorneys’ fees, and other expenses arising from or related to this litigation. 

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 30, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: 

John M. Farrell 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimants

GESTURETEK, INC. and VERY VIVID, INC.

Dated: January 30, 2007 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

By: 

Kurt M. Kjelland 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

REACTRIX SYSTEMS, INC. 

Case 3:06-cv-02175-SI Document 24 Filed 01/30/2007 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-02175-SI Document 25 Filed 02/01/07 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Kurt M. 

Kjelland. 

Dated: January 30, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ John M. Farrell 

John M. Farrell 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim 

Plaintiffs GESTURETEK, INC. and VERY 

VIVID, INC. 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court HEREBY DISMISSES WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE the above-titled action, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________ 

Honorable Susan Illston 

United States District Judge 

50396876.doc 

Case 3:06-cv-02175-SI Document 24 Filed 01/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-02175-SI Document 25 Filed 02/01/07 Page 3 of 3