Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00109/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00109-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE:

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY

TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS

LITIGATION

 

This order pertains to: 

Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation et

al v Obama et al (C-07-0109 VRW), 

 /

MDL Docket No 06-1791 VRW

ORDER

Plaintiffs propose that briefing on their fee application

be deferred until completion of proceedings on any appeal from

judgment. The court determines that postponement of plaintiffs’

fee application pending appeal would not be efficient or prudent

and ORDERS that plaintiffs file their application for attorney fees

by no later than June 30, 2010. Defendants must file an opposition

by July 20, 2010. Plaintiffs may file a reply by July 30, 2010.

With respect to a reasonable hourly rate to be applied in

a lodestar calculation the court refers the parties to the method

employed in In re HPL Technologies, Inc Securities Litigation, 366

\\

\\

Case 3:07-cv-00109-VRW Document 124 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

F Supp 2d 912, 921-22 (ND Cal 2005) (applying hourly rates

published in the Laffey matrix as adjusted for locality).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:07-cv-00109-VRW Document 124 Filed 06/04/10 Page 2 of 2