Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04798/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04798-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATHANIEL BASOLA SOBAYO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-04798-PJH 

ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO UPDATE 

ADDRESS AND RESPOND TO 

DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 39, 40, 41

The docket reflects that mail sent to pro se plaintiff Nathaniel Basola Sobayo was 

returned as undeliverable. Dkt. 39. Plaintiff appears to have listed one address—2148

University Avenue, East Palo Alto, CA 94303—on his state court filings, but a slightly 

different address—2142 University Avenue, East Palo Alto, CA 94303—on his more 

recent filings with this court. 

Defendant Real Time Resolutions (“RTR”) has indicated that plaintiff has not 

responded to its motions to vacate state court default (Dkt. 13) and to dismiss (Dkt. 8). 

See Dkt. 40, 41. In light of the confusion about his address, plaintiff may not have 

received them.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED, as soon as possible, to file with the court a notice of 

his current and correct address. See Local Rule 3-11. Plaintiff shall also indicate 

whether he has received RTR’s motions. If he has not, RTR shall immediately re-serve 

the papers to the correct address.

///

Case 4:16-cv-04798-PJH Document 42 Filed 09/14/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

In light of the confusion regarding plaintiff’s correct address, the court will permit 

plaintiff additional time to respond to RTR’s motions. It is hereby ORDERED that:

 Plaintiff shall file a response to RTR’s motions by September 30, 2016.

 RTR’s reply brief will be due seven days after plaintiff’s response.

 The currently-noticed hearing date of remains as scheduled: October 26, 

2016, at 9 a.m., Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, 1301 Clay St., Oakland, CA.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2016

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:16-cv-04798-PJH Document 42 Filed 09/14/16 Page 2 of 2