Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01127/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01127-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

Bruce A. Neilson #096952 

7108 N. Fresno St. #410 

Fresno, California 93720 

Telephone (559) 432-9831 

Facsimile (559) 432-1837 

Attorney for Defendants 

Paul Riar, Simerjit Riar and Mahja 

Business Solutions 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 * * * * *

RACHEL LOBATO, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

PAUL RIAR aka SURINDER PAUL 

SINGH RIAR, individually and dba 

ROEDING PARK SHELL; MAHJA 

BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, a California 

corporation, dba ROEDING PARK 

SHELL; SIMERJIT RIAR;

 

 Defendants. 

 ____________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-01127--BAM 

 THIRD STIPULATION AND 

PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME FOR PAUL RIAR aka 

SURINDER PAUL SINGH RIAR, 

individually and dba ROEDING PARK 

SHELL; MAHJA BUSINESS 

SOLUTIONS, a California corporation, 

dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; and 

SIMERJIT RIAR TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

WHEREAS: 

1. Plaintiff RACHEL LOBATO filed her complaint in this action on July 20, 2015. 

2. This is the third request for an extension of time for PAUL RIAR aka SURINDER PAUL 

SINGH RIAR, individually and dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; MAHJA BUSINESS 

SOLUTIONS, a California corporation, dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; and SIMERJIT RIAR 

(“Defendants”). A previous extension of time was granted by the Court on September 30, 2015 

and court approval is required for a further extension of time. 

3. Plaintiff and Defendants continue to be in settlement negotiations at this time. 

4. Defendants have had a CASp inspection performed and report prepared, however a 

supplemental report that will affect a proposed settlement has been delayed beyond that previously 

Case 1:15-cv-01127-BAM Document 16 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 2
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

anticipated by the defendants. 

5. The parties agree that settlement of this case would save valuable court time and resources. 

6. The parties have agreed to extend Defendants’ time to respond to the complaint until 

November 20, 2015, subject to the court's approval, and believe that the case can be settled within 

that time. 

7. This extension of time will not alter any date or event already set by Court order, including 

the mandatory scheduling conference. 

 NOW THEREFORE, Defendants through their attorneys, and Plaintiff JOSE ESCOBEDO 

through his attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for PAUL RIAR aka SURINDER 

PAUL SINGH RIAR, individually and dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; MAHJA BUSINESS 

SOLUTIONS, a California corporation, dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; and SIMERJIT RIAR to 

answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended up to and including November 20, 

2015, pending court approval.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 MOORE LAW FIRM, PC 

Dated: October 23, 2015 /s/Tanya Moore 

 Tanya Moore, Attorney for Plaintiff Rachel Lobato 

Dated: October 23, 2015 /s/Bruce A. Neilson 

 Bruce A. Neilson, Attorney for Defendants 

 Paul Riar, Simerjit Riar and Mahja Business 

 Solutions 

 ORDER 

 IT IS SO ORDERED that defendants PAUL RIAR aka SURINDER PAUL SINGH 

RIAR, individually and dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; MAHJA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, a 

California corporation, dba ROEDING PARK SHELL; and SIMERJIT RIAR shall have until 

November 30, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER 

ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from November 30, 2015 to December 

16, 2015 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 8 before Judge McAuliffe. 

Dated: October 27, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:15-cv-01127-BAM Document 16 Filed 10/27/15 Page 2 of 2