Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00455/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00455-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EL SOBRANTE DEVELOPMENT, )

L.L.C, et al., )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

NATIONAL ASSURANCE GROUP, )

INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1: 08-CV-0455 AWI DLB

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This case was filed on March 31, 2008. Through various motions and agreements, the

only defendant who has yet to be terminated is Andrew P. Geiss. Plaintiffs obtained entry of

default against Geiss on October 30, 2008. Despite the lapse of nearly a year and a half,

Plaintiffs have done nothing regarding Geiss in this Court. On November 13, 2009, Plaintiffs’

counsel indicated that he would be applying for judgment against Geiss within thirty days. See

Court’s Docket Doc. No. 73. Well more than 30 days have lapsed, yet Plaintiffs have not applied

for judgment. In fact, it has been nearly five months since the last filing in this case. Given the

state of the docket and the lapse in activity by Plaintiffs, the Court believes that Plaintiffs should

show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall show cause in writing on or

by 2:00 p.m. April 21, 2010 why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 6, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00455-AWI-SKO Document 75 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 1