Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00504/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00504-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD DEUTSCH,

Plaintiff,

vs.

A. ENENMOH, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:13-CV-00504 LJO DLB PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO 

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO 

STATE A CLAIM

(FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE)

Plaintiff Donald Deutsch (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner in the custody of the California 

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this 

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint on April 8, 2013. 

On December 29, 2014, the Court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. 

Plaintiff was granted thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff notified the Court 

of a changed address on January 23, 2015; therefore, the Court re-served the order on February 

2, 2015, and reset the deadline for filing an amended complaint. On February 4, 2015, Plaintiff 

filed a motion for a sixty (60) day extension of time. On February 6, 2015, the Court granted the 

motion for extension of time and extended the deadline by sixty days. On April 6, 2015, Plaintiff 

filed a motion for a thirty (30) day extension of time. On April 13, 2015, the Court granted 

Plaintiff a second extension of time and extended the deadline by an additional thirty (30) days to 

May 18, 2015. The deadline for filing an amended complaint has now passed and Plaintiff has 

Case 1:13-cv-00504-LJO-DLB Document 15 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise communicate with the Court. Plaintiff was 

forewarned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in dismissal with prejudice for 

failure to state a claim.

RECOMMENDATION

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed based 

with prejudice for failure to state a claim. 

These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 

(14) days after date of service of these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written 

objections with the Court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 28, 2015 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00504-LJO-DLB Document 15 Filed 05/28/15 Page 2 of 2