Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_16-cv-00075/USCOURTS-azd-2_16-cv-00075-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jesus Andres Martinez-Bujanda,

Petitioner, 

v. 

Loretta E Lynch, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-16-00075-PHX-JJT (ESW)

ORDER 

 The Court has considered Petitioner’s “Motion for Leave to File a Motion to 

Exceed the 11 Page Limit on a Reply to the Respondent’s Opposition to a Writ of Habeas 

Corpus” (Doc. 29), the lodged proposed “Motion to Exceed the 11 Page Limit on an 

Answer to the Respondent’s Opposition to a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 

30), “Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Add or Supplement 10 More Additional 

Pages” (Doc. 32), the lodged proposed “Motion to Add or Supplement the Petitioner’s 

Reply to the Response in Opposition to a Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 33), “Motion for 

Notice of Lodgment or Supplemental Lodgment of Evidence Support of a Petition for 

Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 35), and “Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing in Support of 

Petitioner’s Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 36). No responses have been filed to 

Petitioner’s multiple requests to exceed the Court’s page limitation on his reply. These 

motions to exceed the Court’s page limitation will be granted. 

Case 2:16-cv-00075-JJT Document 38 Filed 09/01/16 Page 1 of 3
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 The Court has considered Respondents’ “Response In Opposition To Petitioner’s 

Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing” (Doc. 37). No further briefing is necessary regarding 

Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing. The Motion (Doc. 36) will be denied. 

Should the Court determine that an evidentiary hearing is necessary upon review of the 

fully briefed Amended Petition Under 28 U.S.C.§ 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 

17), an evidentiary hearing will be set on the Court’s own motion. 

 For good cause shown, 

IT IS ORDERED granting Petitioner’s “Motion for Leave to File a Motion to 

Exceed the 11 Page Limit on a Reply to the Respondent’s Opposition to a Writ of Habeas 

Corpus” (Doc. 29), the lodged proposed “Motion to Exceed the 11 Page Limit on an 

Answer to the Respondent’s Opposition to a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 

30), “Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Add or Supplement 10 More Additional 

Pages” (Doc. 32), the lodged proposed “Motion to Add or Supplement the Petitioner’s 

Reply to the Response in Opposition to a Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 33), and 

“Motion for Notice of Lodgment or Supplemental Lodgment of Evidence Support of a 

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 35). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the lodged 

proposed “Motion to Exceed the 11 Page Limit on an Answer to the Respondent’s 

Opposition to a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 30). The Court has granted 

that motion above. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the lodged 

proposed “Motion to Add or Supplement the Petitioner’s Reply to the Response in 

Opposition to a Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 33). The Court has granted that motion 

above. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the lodged 

proposed Petitioner’s Supplemental Reply Brief to Respondent’s Response in Opposition 

to a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 34). 

Case 2:16-cv-00075-JJT Document 38 Filed 09/01/16 Page 2 of 3
- 3 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing in 

Support of Petitioner’s Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 36). 

 Dated this 31st day of August, 2016. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:16-cv-00075-JJT Document 38 Filed 09/01/16 Page 3 of 3