Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04716/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04716-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

3:16-cv-04716

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

JESSICA REDDITT, State Bar No. 264673 

BAY AREA LEGAL AID

1735 Telegraph Ave. 

Oakland, CA 94612 

jredditt@baylegal.org 

Phone: (510) 250-5208 

Fax: (510) 663-4740 

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

 Sharon Bonita Green, 

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

 NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

1

 Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

 Defendant

 CIVIL NO. 3:16-cv-04716 

 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S 

CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The parties hereto, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff, Sharon 

Bonita Green, shall have until April 18, 2017, in which to file and serve a reply in this action. This is the second

stipulation for extended time requested by Plaintiff in this matter and is necessary to allow Plaintiff sufficient time to 

review Defendant’s brief and draft a response. 

 

1 Nancy Berryhill is now the Acting Commission of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the 

defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of 

section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Case 3:16-cv-04716-WHO Document 22 Filed 03/07/17 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

3:16-cv-04716

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions shall be

modified accordingly.

 

Dated: March 3, 2017 By:____/s/____________________

 Jessica Redditt

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: March 3, 2017 By: _____/s/_(as authorized via email March 3, 2017) 

Richard Rodriguez on behalf of Marcelo Illarmo

Special Assistant United States Attorney

[PROPOSED] ORDER:

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

 By: ________________________

Dated: Hon. William H. Orrick, United States District Judge

 

Case 3:16-cv-04716-WHO Document 22 Filed 03/07/17 Page 2 of 2