Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05154/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05154-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID KLEIN, individually and on behalf

of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MEDIVATION, INC., et al., 

Defendants. /

No. C 16-05154 WHA

ORDER CONTINUING

DEADLINE TO RESPOND

TO COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), parties may stipulate in writing, without a court order, to

extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. The parties have

so stipulated and requested a court order approving the extension. The stipulated extension is

APPROVED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 28, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-05154-WHA Document 12 Filed 09/28/16 Page 1 of 1