Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01395/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01395-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Ryan James Johnson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff consented to United States magistrate judge jurisdiction 

on December 9, 2015. (ECF No. 9.) Defendants declined United States magistrate judge jurisdiction, 

therefore, this action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 

Rule 302. (ECF No. 13.) 

On June 22, 2016, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint be denied. (ECF No. 17.) Defendants filed objections 

on July 21, 2016. (ECF No. 18.) On September 7, 2016, the Findings and Recommendations were 

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

RYAN JAMES JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff,

v.

M. TORRES, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:15-cv-01395-DAD-SAB (PC)

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A 

RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT WITHIN 

THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE 

OF THIS ORDER

[ECF No. 20]

Case 1:15-cv-01395-DAD-SAB Document 21 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

adopted in full and Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint was denied. (ECF No. 20.) 

Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants shall file a 

further response to the complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 8, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01395-DAD-SAB Document 21 Filed 09/08/16 Page 2 of 2