Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01529/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01529-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1529

RICHARD K. REVELY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CITY OF HUNTINGTON, a municipal corporation; HUNTINGTON 

POLICE DEPARTMENT; SERGEANT BOOTH, individually and in his 

capacity as a police officer of the City of Huntington,

Defendants – Appellees, 

and

JOHN DOES, One through Twelve, 

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, 

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00648)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard K. Revely, Appellant Pro Se. Ryan Q. Ashworth, Steven 

Kenneth Nord, OFFUTT NORD, Huntington, West Virginia, for 

Appellees. 

Appeal: 09-1529 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/24/2010 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-1529 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/24/2010 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Richard K. Revely appeals the district court’s order 

granting Defendants summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2006) action against them and entering judgment in their favor. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we deny Revely’s motions for appointment of counsel 

and Defendants’ motion to strike Revely’s informal brief and 

affirm the district court’s judgment. Revely v. City of 

Huntington, No. 3:07-cv-00648 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 23, 2009). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-1529 Doc: 19 Filed: 05/24/2010 Pg: 3 of 3