Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-06111/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-06111-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIELLE REZENDES,

Plaintiff,

v.

ULTA, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 18-cv-06111-JST 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

DISMISSAL OF CASES

Re: ECF No. 37

QUIANNA TERRY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & 

FRAGRANCE, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 18-cv-07683-JST 

Re: ECF Nos. 32, 34

The parties in both of the above-captioned cases have indicated that they have settled their 

disputes as part of the settlement in Tellez v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc., Case No. 

18-cv-2480-CAB-LL (S.D. Cal.). Rezendes ECF No. 37; Terry ECF No. 32. Rezendes asks that 

all pending dates “be vacated pending entry of final judgment” in Tellez. Rezendes ECF No. 37 at 

2. Terry was “stayed pending an order granting or denying final approval of the Tellez class 

action settlement.” Terry ECF No. 33 at 4. The Tellez court granted final approval of the 

settlement in that case on February 10, 2020, and the plaintiffs’ counsel were ordered to submit a 

proposed judgment by February 18, 2020. Terry ECF No. 34 at 20. The Tellez final approval 

order includes class representative payment awards to both Rezendes and Terry. Id.

The parties in each of the above cases shall show cause in writing, no later than March 6, 

Case 4:18-cv-06111-JST Document 38 Filed 02/24/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

2020, as to why the case should not be dismissed based on the final approval of the Tellez class 

action settlement. In the alternative, the parties may file a stipulated dismissal by the same date. 

Failure to file either response to this order will result in dismissal of the case under Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 24, 2020

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 4:18-cv-06111-JST Document 38 Filed 02/24/20 Page 2 of 2