Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05723/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05723-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Master File Case No. 3:07-cv-05944-JST; MDL No. 1917

David J. Burman (pro hac vice)

Cori G. Moore (pro hac vice) 

Eric J. Weiss (pro hac vice) 

Nicholas H. Hesterberg (pro hac vice) 

Steven D. Merriman (pro hac vice) 

PERKINS COIE LLP

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 

Seattle, WA 98101-3099 

Telephone: 206.359.8000 

Facsimile: 206.359.9000 

Email: DBurman@perkinscoie.com 

 CGMoore@perkinscoie.com 

 EWeiss@perkinscoie.com 

 NHesterberg@perkinscoie.com 

 SMerriman@perkinscoie.com 

David P. Chiappetta (Bar No. 172099) 

PERKINS COIE LLP

505 Howard Street, Suite 1000 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: 415.344.7000 

Facsimile: 415.344.7050 

Email: DChiappetta@perkinscoie.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Costco Wholesale Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

Master File Case No. 3:07-cv-05944-JST 

MDL NO. 1917

This Document Relates to: 

Case No. 3:13-cv-05723-JST 

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TECHNICOLOR SA, et al., 

Defendants. 

Individual Case No. 3:13-cv-05723-JST 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE

Case 3:13-cv-05723-JST Document 40 Filed 04/04/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 1 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Master File Case No. 3:07-cv-05944-JST; MDL No. 1917

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, 

orders as follows: 

1. The action filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation is dismissed with prejudice as 

against Defendants Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Visual 

Solutions America, Inc., and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. 

2. This dismissal does not affect the rights or claims of Costco against any other 

defendant in this litigation. 

3. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

The Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

United States District Judge 

130346711.1 

April 4, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:13-cv-05723-JST Document 40 Filed 04/04/16 Page 2 of 2