Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00551/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00551-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL PURTUE,

Plaintiff,

v.

G. EBERLE et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:15-cv-00551-DAD-SAB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION, AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

(Doc. Nos. 20, 22)

Plaintiff Michael Purtue is a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this 

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States 

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On November 10, 2016, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 

recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. 

(Doc. No. 22.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained 

notice that objections thereto were to be filed within thirty days. (Id.) Plaintiff filed his 

objections to the findings and recommendations on November 28, 2016. (Doc. No. 27.) 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including plaintiff’s 

Case 1:15-cv-00551-DAD-SAB Document 42 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections, the court finds the findings and recommendation to be supported by the record and by 

proper analysis.

Based on the foregoing,

1. The November 10, 2016 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 22) are adopted in 

full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 20) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2017 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00551-DAD-SAB Document 42 Filed 01/06/17 Page 2 of 2