Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01926/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01926-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE AMAYA AND MARIA ELENA

MONTANO

Plaintiffs,

 v.

GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, F/K/A GMAC

MORTGAGE CORPORATION,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-01926 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, have filed claims relating to a mortgage loan that they

obtained. Defendant GMAC filed a motion to dismiss scheduled to be heard on June 24, 2010. 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to the motion from plaintiffs was due

on June 3, 2010, but no such opposition has been received. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to respond

by JUNE 21, 2010, AT NOON, and show cause for their failure to respond to the motion in

accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or alternately to file a statement of nonopposition to

the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). This order to show cause does not constitute

permission to file a late opposition. The hearing scheduled for June 24, 2010, is VACATED. A 

Case 3:10-cv-01926-WHA Document 10 Filed 06/07/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\WHAALL\2010Civ\10-1926 Amaya\osc.wpd 2

new hearing shall be noticed by the Court if necessary. Plaintiffs’ failure to respond to the

order to show cause will likely result in dismissal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 7, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-01926-WHA Document 10 Filed 06/07/10 Page 2 of 2