Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02781/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02781-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

Amended Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

NASSER HAMEDANI, an individual

doing business as GLOBAL VISION

UNLIMITED,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BAYER CORPORATION, an Indiana

corporation, BAYER HEALTHCARE

LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability

Company,

Defendants.

Case No.: C05-02781 MJJ

AMENDED STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR

PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in Court-sponsored Mediation pursuant to ADR L.R. 6.

In the Amended Joint Case Management Statement filed on February 16, 2006, the

parties requested that the Court continue the deadline for Court-sponsored Mediation from May

31, 2006 to August 31, 2006 to allow the parties limited discovery to prepare for a meaningful

ADR session. It was the parties understanding that the Court granted this request during the

Initial Case Management Conference held on February 28, 2006. The continuance, however,

was not reflected in the Pretrial Order issued by the Court on March 7, 2006.

235715v1

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 36 Filed 04/10/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 37 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 3
Amended Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process - 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Accordingly, the parties request that the Court issue an Amended Order setting the

deadline for Court-sponsored Mediation for August 31, 2006.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 10, 2006 __/s/ Patrick E. Guevara_________________________

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MCNICHOLS RANDICK O’DEA & TOOLIATOS LLP

Everitt G.Beers

KevinR. Martin

Patrick E. Guevara

Dated: April 10, 2006 ___/s/ AngelaK. Steele ____________________________

Attorneysfor Defendants

PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD &

GERALDSON LLP

Raymond I. Geraldson,Jr.

ThadChaloemtiarana

DanielleB. Lemack

Angela K. Steele

GLYNN & FINLEY

Clement L. Glynn

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 36 Filed 04/10/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 37 Filed 04/11/06 Page 2 of 3
Amended Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process - 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to Mediation.

The deadline for the Mediation will be ____________________.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: ________________ ________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 36 Filed 04/10/2006 Page 3 of 3

August 31, 2006 4/11/2006

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 37 Filed 04/11/06 Page 3 of 3