Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01122/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01122-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 04-01122 PVT (ADR)

STIPULATION ALLOWING COST BOND AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

0090107/017/ 303518v01 

JoAnna M. Esty, Esq. (SBN: 147903) 

 jesty@linerlaw.com 

Jenna F. Karadbil, Esq. (SBN: 213574) 

 jkaradbil@linerlaw.com 

LINER YANKELEVITZ 

SUNSHINE & REGENSTREIF LLP 

199 Fremont Street, 20th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 489-7700 

Facsimile: (415) 489-7701 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UTSTARCOM, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UTSTARCOM, INC., 

Plaintiff,

vs.

STARENT NETWORKS, 

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 04-01122 PVT (ADR) 

STIPULATION ALLOWING 

COST BOND AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

WHEREAS, on February 2, 2006, the Court granted judgment in favor of 

Defendant and against Plaintiff , 

WHEREAS, on February 16, 2006, Defendant filed its Bill of Costs requesting 

an award of $119,749.40; 

WHEREAS, on March 2, 2006, Plaintiff appealed this Court’s judgment to the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; 

WHEREAS, on March 3, 2006, Plaintiff filed objections to Defendant’s Bill of 

Costs;

WHEREAS, on March 23, 2006 Plaintiff filed its Notice of Substitution of 

new counsel of Liner Yankelevitz Sunshine & Regenstreif, LLP, 

WHEREAS, on March 24, 2006, the Clerk reduced Defendant’s Bill of Costs 

and awarded $59,956.17; 

XXXXXXXXXXXX

Case 5:04-cv-01122-PVT Document 330 Filed 06/22/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 Case No. C 04-01122 PVT (ADR)

STIPULATION ALLOWING COST BOND AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

0090107/017/ 303518v01 

WHEREAS, while the appeal is pending Plaintiff would rather post a bond for 

the awarded costs, so that in the event the appeal is successful, Plaintiff would not 

need to seek return of the costs from Defendant; 

WHEREAS, Defendant will allow Plaintiff to post a bond in lieu of paying the 

costs awarded if Plaintiff increases the bond amount to include two (2) years 

annualized interest at the Federal rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961; 

WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-11 gives the Court authority to grant such an 

administrative request for an Order allowing a cost bond; and 

WHEREAS, the proposed cost bond will have no effect on the case. 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties by and through their respective counsel 

hereby stipulate as follows: 

Plaintiff may post a bond in the amount of $65,640 lieu of the $59,956.17 Bill 

of Costs awards by the Clerk of Court on March 24, 2006. Plaintiff will have thirty 

(30) days from this Order to post such a bond. 

By her signature below, counsel for Plaintiff swears under penalty of perjury 

that counsel for Defendant concurred in the filing of this document. 

Dated: June 6, 2006 LINER YANKELEVITZ 

SUNSHINE & REGENSTREIF LLP 

By: /s/____________________________

JoAnna M. Esty 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UTStarcom, Inc. 

Dated: June 6, 2006 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,

GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

By: /s/____________________________

Scott R. Mosko 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Starent Networks, Corp. 

Case 5:04-cv-01122-PVT Document 330 Filed 06/22/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 3 Case No. C 04-01122 PVT (ADR)

STIPULATION ALLOWING COST BOND AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

0090107/017/ 303518v01 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________ ________________________________

 PATRICIA V. TURNBULL 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 

 6/22/06

XXXXXXXXXXXX

Case 5:04-cv-01122-PVT Document 330 Filed 06/22/06 Page 3 of 3