Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00820/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00820-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 865
Nature of Suit: Social Security - RSI (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:1383 Review of HHS Decision

---

1/

 Michael J. Astrue substituted for Joanne Barnhardt as Commissioner of Social Security. Fed.

R. Civ. P. 17(d).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACQUELINE P. MATTHIES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,1/

 Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

No. 2:05-cv-00820-JKS-GGH

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 3, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations, which were

served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No objections to the Findings and

Recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304,

this Court has reviewed the record on its face and finds no clear error. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 3, 2007, are adopted in full; 

2. The matter is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for

reconsideration of plaintiff’s subjective complaints and nonexertional impairments, reassessment

of plaintiff’s residual functional capacity, and a determination, based upon the testimony of a

Case 2:05-cv-00820-JKS-GGH Document 29 Filed 02/04/08 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

Matthies v. Astrue, 2:05-cv-00820-JKS-GGH 2

vocational expert, whether plaintiff can perform any jobs that exist in significant numbers in the

national economy; and

3. The Clerk of the Court to enter final judgment accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff to submit a Cost Bill in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

54(d)(1) and Local Rule 54-292;

2. Plaintiff’s motion for award of attorney’s fees at Docket No. 26 will be deemed served

and filed immediately after entry of final judgment; and

3. Opposition to the motion for attorney’s fees, if any, must be served and filed within 20

days after entry of judgment and Plaintiff’s reply, if any, to be served and filed not later than 10

days after service of the opposition.

Dated: February 4, 2008

s/ James K. Singleton, Jr.

JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00820-JKS-GGH Document 29 Filed 02/04/08 Page 2 of 2