Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06868/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06868-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID A. FEIST, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

PAUL SCHULTZ, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:03-CV-6868 OWW SMS HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #12]

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On March 13, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED with prejudice and further

recommending that the Clerk of Court be DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Respondent. 

This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date

of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:03-cv-06868-OWW -SMS Document 13 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued March 13, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 2, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06868-OWW -SMS Document 13 Filed 05/03/06 Page 2 of 2