Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00769/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00769-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT ZIESKE,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

VISION FINANCIAL NETWORK;

AMERICAN BROKERS CONDUIT, INC.,

A NEW YORK CORPORATION; SHAHRAM

YEKTARAD, An Individual; and

MICHAEL AZAD, An Individual, and

DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 

 Defendants.

________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2:10-cv-00769-GEB-KJN

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

Plaintiff and Defendant Michael Azad’s Joint Status Report

(“JSR”) filed July 12, 2010, reveals this case is not ready to be fully

scheduled. Plaintiff states in the JSR that all Defendants have been

served. (Docket No. 15, 2:8.) Plaintiff further states: “Defendant

VISION FINANCIAL NETWORK has not appeared and Plaintiff has requested

default against this defendant. Defendant YEKTARAD has been served and

has not yet appeared. American Brokers Conduit, Inc. has filed for

bankruptcy.” (Id., 2:3-6.) However, Plaintiff fails to provide

information about precisely what Plaintiff will do to prosecute his case

against each defendant. Such information should be in a status report.

Plaintiff also states: “Possible joinder of Nationstar as a

Doe Defendant” but fails to say anything about when this could occur.

This information should also be included in a status report. Since it

Case 2:10-cv-00769-KJM -KJN Document 16 Filed 07/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

is unclear how and when Plaintiff will prosecute his case against each

defendant, the status conference scheduled for July 26, 2010, is

continued to September 20, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report

shall be filed fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference in

which Plaintiff shall provide more detailed information about the status

of the case. Further, Plaintiff is notified under Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure 4(m) and 41(b) that if a defendant has not been served

with process, the unserved defendant may be dismissed. If a certificate

of service is not filed forthwith proving service, it will be assumed

that no service has been made and a dismissal order could issue.

Dated: July 16, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:10-cv-00769-KJM -KJN Document 16 Filed 07/16/10 Page 2 of 2