Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-19-07134/USCOURTS-caDC-19-07134-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 19-7134 September Term, 2019

1:19-cv-02567-UNA

Filed On: March 16, 2020

Joi M. Kelly,

Appellant

v.

Commonwealth of Virginia, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Tatel and Millett, Circuit Judges; Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s October 8, 2019 order

dismissing appellant’s complaint without prejudice be affirmed. The district court

correctly concluded that appellant’s complaint failed to comply with the requirements of

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) (requiring a complaint to

contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to

relief”).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #19-7134 Document #1833691 Filed: 03/16/2020 Page 1 of 1