Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Jeffrey L. Kessler (Pro Hac Vice) 

jkessler@deweyballantine.com

Aldo A. Badini (Pro Hac Vice) 

abadini@deweyballantine.com 

Lisa B. Deutsch (Pro Hac Vice) 

ldeutsch@deweyballantine.com 

DEWEY BALLANTINE LLP 

1301 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10019-6092 

Telephone: 212 259-8000 

Facsimile: 212 259-6333 

Shamita D. Etienne-Cummings (Bar No. 202090) 

setienne@mwe.com 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: (650) 813-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 813-5100 

Attorneys for MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. and PANASONIC 

CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD. 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MEDIATEK, INC., OPPO DIGITAL, INC., and

MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL 

COMPUTER CORP. 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PANASONIC’S MOTION FOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO 

FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

MEDIATEK, INC. 

Counterclaimant, 

v. 

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD. and PANASONIC CORPORATION 

OF NORTH AMERICA, 

Counterclaim Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Judge: The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

Date: November 3, 2006 

Time: 9:00 am 

Ctrm: 7, 19th floor 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 166 Filed 10/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2– 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PANASONIC’S ADMINISTRATIVE 

REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Having considered Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (“MEI”) and Panasonic 

Corporation of North America's (“PNA”) (together “Panasonic”) Motion to File Documents 

Under Seal, along with any opposition filed by Defendants MediaTek, Inc., MSI Computer 

Corp., and OPPO Digital, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), the Court finds that good cause exists 

for granting Panasonic's Motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ ____________________________________ 

THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

MAGISTRATE October 10, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 166 Filed 10/11/06 Page 2 of 2