Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520-1291/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 On October 6, 2023, the parties filed a second amended joint exhibit list setting out their 

17 agreement on the authenticity of admissibility of all proposed exhibits for the staffing contempt 

18 hearing that began September 29, 2023. ECF No. 8002. The parties filed the second amended 

19 joint exhibit list the day after conclusion of the presentation of evidence. See ECF No. 8000. To 

20 clarify the record, the court issues the following order confirming which exhibits were admitted at 

21 hearing, which exhibits were not admitted because they were not moved into evidence, and one 

22 exhibit on which the court defers a decision regarding admissibility. 

23 Each exhibit on the second amended joint exhibit list that the parties stipulated to as both 

24 authentic and admissible was admitted at hearing: DEFS-001 through DEFS-003, inclusive; 

25 DEFS-005 for limited purpose to establish expert opinions and bases therefore; DEFS-006 

26 through DEFS-027; PL-006; PL-008; PL-009; PL-011; PL012; PL-020; PL-024 for limited 

27 purpose to establish expert opinions and bases therefore; PL-026 through PL-048, inclusive; 

28 PL-099; PL-101; and PL-109 are ADMITTED. 

RALPH COLEMAN, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P 

ORDER 

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 8016 Filed 10/18/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 Neither party moved to admit the following exhibits: PL-001 through PL-005, inclusive; 

2 PL-007; PL-010; PL-013 through PL-019, inclusive; PL-021 through PL-023; PL-100; PL-102; 

3 PL-103 through PL-108. These exhibits thus are NOT a part of the record. 

4 The court sustained plaintiffs’ objection to DEFS-004 at hearing; DEFS-004 is NOT 

5 ADMITTED. 

6 The court overruled defendants’ objection to exhibits PL-049 through PL-098, inclusive, 

7 at hearing; PL-049 through PL-098, inclusive, are ADMITTED. 

8 The court DEFERS ruling on the admissibility of PL-110 pending a further report from 

9 the parties or briefing on its admissibility in closing briefs. 

10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

11 DATED: October 17, 2023. 

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 8016 Filed 10/18/23 Page 2 of 2