Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02397/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02397-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM JOSEPH BABBITT,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT

SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:24-cv-2397-DJC-JDP (PS) 

ORDER

On October 30, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 

recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice 

that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 

fourteen days. No objections were filed.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 

are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 

(“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 

district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds 

the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper 

Case 2:24-cv-02397-DJC-JDP Document 6 Filed 12/30/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed October 30, 2024 are 

ADOPTED; 

2. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, ECF No. 4, is DISMISSED without leave to 

amend; 

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 27, 2024 

Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-02397-DJC-JDP Document 6 Filed 12/30/24 Page 2 of 2