Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00243/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00243-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUILLERMO BUZUA-AVILES, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

R.D. ANDREWS, Warden, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:05-cv-00243-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 4)

ORDER REFERRING CASE BACK TO THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FURTHER

PROCEEDINGS

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Taft Correctional

Institution, Taft, California. 

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On February 22, 2005, Petitioner filed the instant Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241,

raising two claims: (1) improper calculation of his sentence by the district court; and (2) disparate

treatment of illegal aliens in federal prisons. (Doc. 1, p. 3). On April 18, 2005, the United States

Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Ground One of the

petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. (Doc. 4). This Report and Recommendation

Case 1:05-cv-00243-AWI-TAG Document 6 Filed 05/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty

(30) days from the date of service of that order. On May 6, 2005, Petitioner timely filed his

objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 5). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed April 18, 2005 (Court Doc. 4), is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Ground One in the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED;

and

3. The matter is remanded to the United States Magistrate Judge for further

proceedings as to the remaining Ground Two. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 26, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00243-AWI-TAG Document 6 Filed 05/26/05 Page 2 of 2