Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00705/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00705-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLENN CORNWELL, JR., 

Petitioner, No. 2:06-cv-00705 JAM KJN DP

vs. DEATH PENALTY CASE

WARDEN,

 San Quentin State Prison, 

 ORDER & FINDINGS AND

Respondent. RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner has informed the court that the California Supreme Court resolved his

state habeas petitions and thus “exhaustion, as defined in this Court’s Order of March 26,

2007 (Docket No. 22) is now completed.” (Pet’r’s Feb. 25, 2010 Status Report at 3.) 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the stay of these proceedings be lifted.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

Case 2:06-cv-00705-TLN-KJN Document 34 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

In addition, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. On March 18, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom #25, this court will hold a case

management conference. Petitioner’s counsel shall be prepared to discuss whether petitioner

anticipates filing an amended petition. Respondent’s counsel shall be prepared to discuss a date

to lodge the state court record as described in Local Rule 191(j)(1) and a date for filing the

answer or other responsive pleading. In addition, in advance of the conference, both parties shall

review the case management and budgeting procedures set out in the attached “Guide to Case

Management and Budgeting in Capital Habeas Cases.” 

2. At the conclusion of the case management conference, respondent's counsel

will be excused and the conference will continue ex parte with counsel for petitioner present to

discuss budgeting procedures. Petitioner’s counsel shall bring to the budgeting conference a

completed Case Evaluation Form, Appendix B to the attached Guide. 

3. In addition to serving this order upon counsel, the Clerk of the Court is

directed to serve it upon Kurt Heiser, CJA Administrator, Office of the Federal Defender; and

Sandy Andrews, Research and Policy Analyst, Office of the Circuit Executive.

DATED: March 2, 2010

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cornwell cmc 1.or

Case 2:06-cv-00705-TLN-KJN Document 34 Filed 03/02/10 Page 2 of 2