Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-00164/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-00164-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1 

18cv164-LAB(BLM) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MICROBIOTIC HEALTH FOODS 

INCORPORATED, d/b/a NANA’S COOKIE 

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

NANAJOES, LLC, a California limited liability 

company, 

Defendant.

 Case No.: 18cv164-LAB(BLM) 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION 

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH 

MODIFICATIONS 

[ECF No. 19] 

On August 28, 2018, the parties filed a “Joint Motion Requesting Entry of Protective 

Order” requesting that the Court enter the parties’ proposed Order. ECF No. 19. The Court has 

considered the Proposed Protective Order and, for good cause shown, the joint motion is 

GRANTED with the following modifications: 

 1. Paragraph 6 should read: “Before any MATERIALS are filed with the Court for any 

purpose, the Party seeking to file such material must seek leave of the Court to file the material 

Case 3:18-cv-00164-LAB-BLM Document 20 Filed 08/28/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 3
2 

18cv164-LAB(BLM) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

under seal. Subject to public policy, and further court order, nothing shall be filed under seal 

and the Court shall not be required to take any action, without separate prior order by the Judge 

before whom the hearing or proceeding will take place, after application by the affected party 

with appropriate notice to opposing COUNSEL. If the Court grants a Party permission to file an 

item under seal, a duplicate disclosing all non-confidential information, if any, shall be filed and 

made part of the public record. The item may be redacted to eliminate confidential material 

from the document. The document shall be titled to show that it corresponds to an item filed 

under seal, e.g., ‘Redacted Copy of Sealed Declaration of John Smith in Support of Motion for 

Summary Judgment.’ The sealed and redacted documents shall be filed simultaneously. To the 

extent that any Confidential Information is filed with the Clerk of Court or with the Court, it shall 

be filed in accordance with the Local Rules and guidelines set forth by the Court. No document 

may be filed under seal, i.e., closed to inspection by the public except pursuant to a Court order 

that authorizes the sealing of the particular document, or portions of it. A sealing order may 

issue only upon a showing that the information is privileged or protectable under the law. The 

request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of the confidential or privileged material. 

To file a document under seal, the parties must comply with the procedures explained in Section 

II.j of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual for the United 

States District Court for the Southern District of California and Civil Local Rule 79.2. In 

addition, in accordance with Judge Major's preferences, a party must file a ‘public’ 

version of any document that it seeks to file under seal. In the public version, the 

party may redact only that information that is deemed ‘Confidential.’ The party 

should file the redacted document(s) simultaneously with a joint motion or ex parte 

Case 3:18-cv-00164-LAB-BLM Document 20 Filed 08/28/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 3
3 

18cv164-LAB(BLM) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

application requesting that the confidential portions of the document(s) be filed 

under seal and setting forth good cause for the request.” 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 8/28/2018 

Case 3:18-cv-00164-LAB-BLM Document 20 Filed 08/28/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 3