Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00430/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00430-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOHN M. LUEBBERKE, City Attorney

State Bar No. 164893

TED DANIEL WOOD, Deputy City Attorney

State Bar No. 191768

BRYAN D. ROME, Deputy City Attorney

State Bar No. 292949

425 N. El Dorado Street, 2nd Floor

Stockton, CA 95202

Telephone: (209) 937-8333

Facsimile: (209) 937-8898

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF STOCKTON, ERIC JONES, JOHN GRIFFIN, JASON SCHAFFER, THOMAS 

HESLIN, and JAMES MANOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

R.T., a minor, by and through her 

guardian ad litem PENEUILA NUU, 

individually and as successor-in-interest 

to Decedent MATAUTU NUU; 

PENEUILA NUU; MATAUAO NUU; 

KARISIMASI NUU; K.O., a minor, by 

and through her guardian ad litem, 

DANIEL OJEDA,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ERIC JONES, individually, 

JOHN GRIFFIN, individually, 

JASON SCHAFFER, individually, 

THOMAS HESLIN, individually, 

JAMES MANOR, individually and, 

Stockton police officers DOES 1-25, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:15-CV-00430-TLN-KJN

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND ORDER

Complaint Filed: February 24, 2015

Trial Date: October 18, 2016

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs, through their attorney of 

record, BEN NISENBAUM, Law Offices of John Burris; and Defendants, by and through their 

attorney of record, BRYAN D. ROME, City of Stockton, Office of the City Attorney, that the 

following deadlines be continued:

Discovery Completion: June 27, 2016 (Prior date was May 27, 2016)

No other deadlines are changed. 

Case 2:15-cv-00430-TLN-DB Document 38 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 2
2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties have engaged in discovery in good faith. Depositions of Plaintiffs were 

previously scheduled to be completed on May 20, 2016; following a request from Plaintiffs’ 

counsel, those depositions will be split over the course of two days and will conclude 

May 27, 2016. An extension of the close of discovery is necessary to allow the parties to resolve 

any disputes that arise during the course of the depositions. The parties stipulate that this 

schedule will provide the best opportunity to prepare for trial and get the case in the best possible 

position for participation in a Settlement Conference. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: May 18, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

JOHN M. LUEBBERKE

CITY ATTORNEY

By /s/ Bryan D. Rome

BRYAN D. ROME

 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: May 18, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

By /s/ Ben Nisenbaum

BEN NISENBAUM, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court 

hereby orders that the following deadlines be continued:

Discovery Completion: June 27, 2016 (Prior date was May 27, 2016)

No other deadlines are changed 

Dated: May 19, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-00430-TLN-DB Document 38 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 2