Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01837/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01837-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARY DEAN REED and M. DEAN )

REED PRODUCTION COMPANY aka )

THE ALE FACTORY, )

)

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

vs. )

)

)

KERN COUNTY POLICE )

DEPARTMENT, et al., )

)

)

Defendants. )

)

)

No. CV-F-06-1837 OWW/TAG 

ORDER STRIKING DOCS. 43-45 

On April 3, 2007, the United States Magistrate Judge

recommended that this action be dismissed because of Plaintiff’s

failure to comply with a court order that Plaintiff file an

amended complaint and that Plaintiff’s motion to re-instate

complaint, her request to submit song lyrics in lieu of the

filing fee, and her recommendation that this case be combined

with No. CV-F-06-1066 be denied. 

By Order filed on May 21, 2007, the Magistrate Judge’s

Case 1:06-cv-01837-OWW -TAG Document 46 Filed 07/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

recommendation was adopted by the Court, the action was dismissed

with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order, and all

pending motions filed by Plaintiff were denied as moot. Judgment

dismissing the action with prejudice was entered by the Clerk of

the Court on May 21, 2007 as required by law. 

Since entry of Judgment dismissing the action with

prejudice, Plaintiff has filed three motions:

1. “Motion for: Settlement/Scheduling

Conference Motion for [undecipherable]

Behavior to Change” filed on June 4, 2007

(Doc. 43);

2. “Motion for Scheduling Conference and

Settlement Conference or Settlement Without

Conference Per/Casework - Partial Plea” filed

on June 11, 2007 (Doc. 44);

3. “Motion to Pay in According with Rights

of GUARDIAN Seting [sic] Non-Scheduled

Conference - Settlement Conference or/in

Motion to Schedule (Scheduling

Conference/Settlement Conference)” filed on

June 18, 2007 (Doc. 44).

These three motions are stricken. Their content is

rambling, incoherent and bizarre and frequently undecipherable. 

Because the action has been dismissed, there is no basis to

conduct any scheduling or settlement conferences in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 29, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01837-OWW -TAG Document 46 Filed 07/02/07 Page 2 of 2