Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05150/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05150-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

Case No. C 03-05150 SI 

Michael D. Michel, Esq. (State Bar No. CA 062131) 

Jeff M. Fackler, Esq. (State Bar No. CA 142101) 

MICHEL & FACKLER 

A Professional Corporation 

Watergate Office Towers 

2000 Powell Street, Suite 1000 

Emeryville, California 94608 

Telephone: (510) 547-7319 

Facsimile: (510) 547-7320 

Attorneys for Plaintiff KEVIN BREWER 

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

GREGORY N. PIMSTONE (State Bar No. CA 150203) 

HENRY C. WANG (State Bar No. CA 196537) 

11355 West Olympic Boulevard 

Los Angeles, CA 90064-1614 

Telephone: (310) 312-4000 

Facsimile: (310) 312-4224 

Attorneys for Defendant FORTIS INSURANCE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KEVIN BREWER, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

FORTIS INSURANCE COMPANY and 

DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 

Defendants.

Case No. C 03-05150 SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL 

CONFERENCE AND PRETRIAL FILING 

DATES 

Pretrial Conference: April 19, 2005 

Trial Date: May 2, 2005 

Plaintiff Kevin Brewer (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Fortis Insurance Company 

(“Defendant,” collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel of record 

herein, enter into a stipulation on the following considerations. 

1. The Parties have agreed to the terms of a settlement, and have executed a formal 

settlement agreement (“Agreement”). 

2. Pursuant to the Agreement, Plaintiff shall deliver to Defendant’s counsel, along 

with the executed Agreement, a Request for Dismissal of the Action, dismissing the Action with 

Case 3:03-cv-05150-SI Document 219 Filed 05/27/2005 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:03-cv-05150-SI Document 220 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 3
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

Case No. C 03-05150 SI 

prejudice as against Defendant. Defendant’s counsel is authorized to file the Request for 

Dismissal following its performance of its obligations under the Agreement within fifteen (15) 

days of the execution of the Agreement. Based on this schedule, the parties expect that the 

dismissal will be filed on or around June 10, 2005. 

3. Pursuant to the Court’s Order, this matter has been set for a pretrial conference on 

May 24, 2005 at 3:30 p.m. and trial on May 31, 2005. 

4. Given the Parties have reached a settlement and that consideration for the 

Agreement will be provided within fifteen (15) days of the execution of the Agreement, the 

parties submit that good cause exists for taking the trial date off calendar.

5. Accordingly, the Parties respectfully request that the Court take the Pretrial 

Conference Date and Trial Date off calendar, and set this matter for an Order to Show Cause Re: 

Dismissal on June 17, 2005 or another date convenient for the Court in the event that the 

dismissal has not been filed by that date. 

Pursuant to the request of the Parties, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR. 

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS: 

 a. The current Trial Date and Pretrial Conference Date are taken off calendar; 

and

 b. An Order to Show Cause re Dismissal shall be scheduled for 

____________, 2005 at ______ a.m./p.m. The hearing shall be vacated if a dismissal is filed 

prior to the hearing date.

Case 3:03-cv-05150-SI Document 219 Filed 05/27/2005 Page 2 of 3

6/17/05 9:00

Case 3:03-cv-05150-SI Document 220 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 3
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 3 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

Case No. C 03-05150 SI 

Date: May 26, 2005 MICHEL & FACKLER 

By: s/ Michael D. Michel 

Michael D. Michel, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

KEVIN BREWER 

Date: May 26, 2005 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

By: s/ Gregory N. Pimstone 

Gregory N. Pimstone, Esq. 

Attorneys for Defendant

FORTIS INSURANCE COMPANY 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, 

Gregory N. Pimstone hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: _________________, 2005 

 The Honorable Susan Illston 

 United States District Judge 

40882954.2

Case 3:03-cv-05150-SI Document 219 Filed 05/27/2005 Page 3 of 3 Case 3:03-cv-05150-SI Document 220 Filed 05/31/05 Page 3 of 3