Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-00566/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-00566-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEILA MCCOY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:22-cv-00566-DAD-JDP (PS)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 

service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that 

a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixtythree days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service, and plaintiff has 

failed to notify the court of a current address.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice for failure to prosecute. See E.D. L.R. 183(b).

I submit these findings and recommendations to the district judge under

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 304 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States 

District Court, Eastern District of California. The parties may, within 14 days of the service of 

the findings and recommendations, file written objections to the findings and recommendations 

with the court. Such objections should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

Case 2:22-cv-00566-DAD-JDP Document 8 Filed 12/27/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and Recommendations.” The district judge will review the findings and recommendations under 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 23, 2022 

JEREMY D. PETERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-00566-DAD-JDP Document 8 Filed 12/27/22 Page 2 of 2