Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03080/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03080-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HEATHER QUINN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CORDIS CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-03080-WHO 

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT'S 

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STAY

On June 13, 2016, defendant filed a motion to dismiss, which is set to be heard on July 20, 

2017. Dkt. No. 7. On June 27, 2016, plaintiffs filed a motion to remand and a motion to stay the 

case pending the Court’s resolution of the motion to remand, which are set to be heard on August 

10, 2016. Dkt. Nos. 16, 17. I will treat the motion to stay (Dkt. No. 17) as an administrative 

motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11. Within four days of the date of this Order, defendant shall 

file a response of not more than 5 pages to plaintiffs’ motion to stay. Pending my determination of 

plaintiffs’ motion to stay, the briefing schedule on defendants’ motion to dismiss is stayed. The 

briefing schedule on plaintiffs’ motion to remand is not stayed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2016

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-03080-EMC Document 18 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 1