Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-05580/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-05580-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

STIPULATION ANDPROPOSED ORDER 1 Case No. 03-5580 CW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

GARY M. LEPPER, SBN 45498

WAKAKO T. URITANI, SBN 223619

LEPPER & HARRINGTON

1600 S. Main Street, Suite 305

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

(925) 256-6180

(925) 943-6190 (fax)

Attorneys for defendants

County of Napa, Terry Davis

and Lawrence Braun

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES THOMAS HART,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

LAWRENCE L. BRAUN, COUNTY OF

NAPA, TERRY DAVIS, Public Defender for

the County of Napa,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 03-05580 CW

STIPULATION FOR REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME IN RESPONSE

TO ORDER FOR BRIEFING AFTER

REMAND AND PROPOSED ORDER

 On October 12, 2005, the parties stipulated and this Court ordered an extension of time in

response to an “order for briefing after remand and proposed order.” The revised briefing schedule is

as follows:

• Defendants’ motion by November 15, 2005;

• Plaintiff’s opposition by November 29, 2005; and

• Defendants’ reply by December 6, 2005.

//

//

//

Case 4:03-cv-05580-CW Document 26 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 1 of 3 Case 4:03-cv-05580-CW Document 27 Filed 11/16/05 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION ANDPROPOSED ORDER 2 Case No. 03-5580 CW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Defendant requested these dates with every intention to comply. However, unexpected and

unanticipated events have since occurred, disabling the defendants from preparing a satisfactory

summary judgment motion.

In Pacifica v. ABAG (Alameda County, Case No. RG05199072), Mr. Lepper is preparing an

opposition to two summary judgment motions while simultaneously preparing two counter summary

judgment motions, all due by November 16, 2005. In Zacks Inc. v. City of Sausalito (Marin County,

Case No. CV 050995), Mr. Lepper is preparing an opposition to plaintiff’s summary judgment motion

due by November 15, 2005. In addition, the associate attorney who worked with Mr. Lepper on these

cases abruptly resigned; as a result, Mr. Lepper has to prepare all of them himself.

Consequently, defendants respectfully request and plaintiff stipulates to a revised briefing

schedule, as follows:

• Defendants’ motion by November 29, 2005;

• Plaintiff’s opposition by December 13, 2005; and

• Defendants’ reply by December 20, 2005.

DATED: November 14, 2005 LEPPER & HARRINGTON

 /s/

 __________________________________

 GARY M. LEPPER

 Attorney for Defendants

DATED: November 14, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF FRANK G. PRANTIL

 /s/

 __________________________________

 FRANK G. PRANTIL

 Attorney for Plaintiff

//

//

Case 4:03-cv-05580-CW Document 26 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 2 of 3 Case 4:03-cv-05580-CW Document 27 Filed 11/16/05 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION ANDPROPOSED ORDER 3 Case No. 03-5580 CW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

IT IS SO ORDERED:

DATED: November 14, 2005 __________________________________

 JUDGE CLAUDIA WILKEN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 4:03-cv-05580-CW Document 26 Filed 11/14/2005 Page 3 of 3

16

Case 4:03-cv-05580-CW Document 27 Filed 11/16/05 Page 3 of 3