Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-527/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT BY THE COURT AGAINST THE IRICO DEFENDANTS (MDL DKT NO. 5191)

MDL NO. 1917 │ 3:07-cv-05944 JST

Gerald F. George (CA State Bar No. 142573)

geraldgeorge@dwt.com

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 276-6500

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 

Carl W. Oberdier (pro hac vice)

cwo@oberdier.com

Kellen G. Ressmeyer (pro hac vice)

kgr@oberdier.com

Sara K. Hunkler (pro hac vice)

skh@oberdier.com

OBERDIER RESSMEYER LLP

655 Third Avenue, 28th Floor

New York, New York 10017

Attorneys for Defendants

IRICO GROUP CORP. and

IRICO DISPLAY DEVICES CO., LTD.

[Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION,

Case No.: 3:07−cv−05944−JST

MDL No.: 1917

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR DIRECT 

PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ 

APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT BY THE COURT 

AGAINST THE IRICO DEFENDANTS 

(MDL DKT NO. 5191)

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS

Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Irico Display Devices Co., Ltd. 

and Irico Group Corporation (together, “Irico”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby 

stipulate as follows:

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 5208 Filed 09/13/17 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT BY THE COURT AGAINST THE IRICO DEFENDANTS (MDL DKT NO. 5191)

MDL NO. 1917 │ 3:07-cv-05944 JST

WHEREAS, on August 14, 2017, Plaintiffs filed an Application For Default Judgment By 

The Court Against The Irico Defendants (the “Default Judgment Application”) (MDL Dkt. No. 

5191);

WHEREAS, on August 22, 2017, the Court entered its Order providing that Irico would 

have two weeks from Plaintiffs’ filing on the docket of a proof of service of the Default Judgment 

Application to file a response, and Plaintiffs would have one additional week to file a reply brief

(MDL Dkt. No. 5196);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed such proof of service on August 30, 2017 (MDL Dkt. No. 

5199);

WHEREAS, new undersigned counsel for Irico filed notices of appearances and/or 

motions for admission pro hac vice on September 8, 2017 (MDL Dkt. Nos. 5200-5203);

WHEREAS, Irico’s counsel needs a reasonable period of time to become familiar with 

the issues in the case and prepare a response to the Default Judgment Application; and

WHEREAS, Irico’s counsel has conferred with Plaintiffs’ counsel and obtained Plaintiffs’ 

consent to an extension of Irico’s time to respond to the Default Judgment Application until 

October 4, 2017. Plaintiffs do not concede that Irico has an unlimited right to respond 

substantively to the issues raised by Plaintiffs’ application for a default and/or to submit evidence 

or argument in response to that submitted by Plaintiffs.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for Irico and 

Plaintiffs, that:

Irico’s response to the Default Judgment Application shall be due on or before October 4, 

2017;

Plaintiffs’ reply in further support of their Default Judgment Application shall be due on 

or before October 11, 2017; and

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 5208 Filed 09/13/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT BY THE COURT AGAINST THE IRICO DEFENDANTS (MDL DKT NO. 5191)

MDL NO. 1917 │ 3:07-cv-05944 JST

The Court shall re-set the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Default Judgment Application at its 

convenience.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________ _____________________________

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge

Dated: September 12, 2017

/s/ R. Alexander Saveri

Guido Saveri (22349)

guido@saveri.com

R. Alexander Saveri (173102)

rick@saveri.com

Geoffrey C. Rushing (126910)

grushing@saveri.com

Cadio Zirpoli (179108)

cadio@saveri.com

Matthew D. Heaphy (227224)

mheaphy@saveri.com

SAVERI & SAVERI, INC.

706 Sansome Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 217-6810

Facsimile: (415) 217-6813

Lead Counsel for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Gerald F. George

Gerald F. George (CA State Bar No. 142573)

geraldgeorge@dwt.com

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 276-6500

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 

Carl W. Oberdier (pro hac vice)

cwo@oberdier.com

Kellen G. Ressmeyer (pro hac vice)

kgr@oberdier.com

Sara K. Hunkler (pro hac vice)

skh@oberdier.com

OBERDIER RESSMEYER LLP

655 Third Avenue, 28th Floor

New York, New York 10017

Telephone: (212) 659-5141

Facsimile: (646) 349-4925

Attorneys for Defendants

Irico Group Corp. And

Irico Display Devices Co., Ltd.

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

shall be held on November 16, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. September 13, 2017

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 5208 Filed 09/13/17 Page 3 of 3