Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00205/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00205-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT BENYAMINI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

M. BLACKBURN, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-0205 MCE AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was 

denied (ECF No. 74) and this case is ready to proceed to trial. However, before pretrial and trial 

dates are set, the parties will be required to complete the attached notices and file them with the 

court regarding whether they believe a settlement conference would be beneficial in this case. 

 The court notes that plaintiff currently has five other active civil rights cases against 

corrections staff in various stages of litigation pending in this district: (1) Benyamini v. O’Brian, 

2:11-cv-2317 TLN AC P; (2) Benyamini v. Swett, 2:13-cv-0735 KJM EFB P; (3) Benyamini v. 

Vance, 2:13-cv-0910 TLN AC P; (4) Benyamini v. Minton, 2:13-cv-1632 JAM AC P; and (5) 

Benyamini v. Agnone, 2:15-cv-1223 TLN KJN P. If defendants believe that a settlement 

conference in this case would be beneficial, counsel for defendants should consult with the 

appropriate individuals within the Attorney General’s Office and the California Department of 

Case 2:13-cv-00205-MCE-AC Document 75 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Corrections and Rehabilitation to determine whether they would like the settlement conference to 

attempt to resolve any or all of plaintiff’s other cases. If appropriate, the parties should identify 

which, if any, of plaintiff’s other cases they would like to attempt to resolve during a settlement 

conference in this case. Further orders will issue once both parties have filed their notices with 

the court. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the filing of this 

order, the parties must each complete and file the attached notices. 

DATED: December 1, 2015 

 

Case 2:13-cv-00205-MCE-AC Document 75 Filed 12/02/15 Page 2 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT BENYAMINI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

M. BLACKBURN, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-0205 MCE AC P 

NOTICE REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN 

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

Check one: 

 Yes, plaintiff believes that a settlement conference in this case would be beneficial. 

 No, plaintiff does not believe that a settlement conference in this case would be beneficial. 

If you answered yes, please check which, if any, of the following cases you would also 

like to attempt to resolve during a settlement conference in this case: 

 Benyamini v. O’Brian, 2:11-cv-2317 TLN AC P 

 Benyamini v. Swett, 2:13-cv-0735 KJM EFB P 

 Benyamini v. Vance, 2:13-cv-0910 TLN AC P 

//// 

//// 

Case 2:13-cv-00205-MCE-AC Document 75 Filed 12/02/15 Page 3 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4

 Benyamini v. Minton, 2:13-cv-1632 JAM AC P 

 Benyamini v. Agnone, 2:15-cv-1223 TLN KJN P 

DATED:_______________________ 

 ______________________________________ 

 ROBERT BENYAMINI 

 Plaintiff pro se 

 

Case 2:13-cv-00205-MCE-AC Document 75 Filed 12/02/15 Page 4 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT BENYAMINI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

M. BLACKBURN, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-0205 MCE AC P 

NOTICE REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN 

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

Check one: 

 Yes, defendants Blackburn and Marzan believe that a settlement conference in this case 

would be beneficial. 

 No, defendants Blackburn and Marzan do not believe that a settlement conference in this 

case would be beneficial. 

If you answered yes, please check which, if any, of the following cases you would also 

like to attempt to resolve during a settlement conference in this case: 

 Benyamini v. O’Brian, 2:11-cv-2317 TLN AC P 

 Benyamini v. Swett, 2:13-cv-0735 KJM EFB P 

 Benyamini v. Vance, 2:13-cv-0910 TLN AC P 

Case 2:13-cv-00205-MCE-AC Document 75 Filed 12/02/15 Page 5 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

6

 Benyamini v. Minton, 2:13-cv-1632 JAM AC P 

 Benyamini v. Agnone, 2:15-cv-1223 TLN KJN P 

DATED:_______________________ 

 ______________________________________ 

 Attorney for defendants Blackburn and Marzan 

Case 2:13-cv-00205-MCE-AC Document 75 Filed 12/02/15 Page 6 of 6