Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05919/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05919-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________

Order Granting Motion to Compel

James J. Arendt, Esq. Bar No. 142937

Michael R. Linden, Esq. Bar No. 192485

THE LAW FIRM OF

WEAKLEY, RATLIFF,

ARENDT & McGUIRE, LLP

1630 East Shaw Avenue, Suite 176

Fresno, California 93710

Telephone: (559) 221-5256

Facsimile: (559) 221-5262

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF MADERA

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

MOISES I. FUENTES, JR., and ANA P.

FUENTES, by and through their Guardian ad

Litem, BLANCA MARTINEZ, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

COUNTY OF MADERA, et al., 

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:04-cv-05919 OWW SMS

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO

INTERROGATORIES

The Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories of defendant COUNTY OF

MADERA (collectively hereinafter “defendant COUNTY”) came for a hearing before the

Honorable Sandra M. Snyder, United States Magistrate Judge, Courtroom 7, on Friday, June 2,

2006, at 9:30 a.m. Defendant COUNTY was represented by Michael R. Linden, Esq., of the Law

Firm of Weakley, Ratliff, Arendt & McGuire LLP. Defendant CORRECTIONAL MANAGED

CARE MEDICAL CORPORATION was represented by Julie C. Grebel, Esq., of Hall, Hieatt &

Connely, LLP. No appearance was made on behalf of plaintiffs MOISES I. FUENTES, JR., and

ANA P. FUENTES, by and through their Guardian ad Litem, BLANCA MARTINEZ. 

///

Case 1:04-cv-05919-OWW -SMS Document 61 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________

Order Granting Motion to Compel 2

After full consideration of the Joint Statement of Discovery Dispute, as well as arguments

made by counsel for at the hearing, it is hereby ordered as follows:

The motion to compel is GRANTED.

Plaintiffs shall provide further responses to defendant COUNTY’s Interrogatories, Set No.

1, Interrogatory Nos. 2-4, 6-23, within ten (10) days after the Notice of Entry of the instant Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 16, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05919-OWW -SMS Document 61 Filed 06/16/06 Page 2 of 2