Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01395/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01395-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

-1- 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FRANK CRUM, SBN 155125 

The Law Office of Frank J. Crum 

A Professional Corporation 

P.O. Box 2390 

Woodland, CA 95776-2390 

Telephone: (530) 668-1515 

Facsimile: (530) 668-1651 

E-mail: frank@fjclegal.com

Attorney for Plaintiff 

DAVID W. CALFEE, III 

BRADLEY S. THOMAS, SBN 78946 

The Thomas Law Firm 

1756 Picasso Ave, Suite A 

Davis, CA 95618 

Telephone: (530) 757-0883 

Facsimile: (530) 757-0895 

E-mail: brad@masonthomas.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

WILLIAM K. GRAHAM, THOMAS P. CHURCH, MICHELE A. CHURCH, and 

MICHAEL U. SBROCCO III 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

DAVID W. CALFEE, III, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

WILLIAM K. GRAHAM aka BILLY 

GRAHAM, THOMAS P. CHURCH aka TOM 

CHURCH, MICHELE A. CHURCH, 

MICHAEL U. SBROCCO III aka MIKE 

SBROCCO and DOES 1 through 10, 

Inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO.: 2:14-cv01395-JAM-AC 

ORDER OF SETTLEMENT AND 

DISMISSAL 

Case 2:14-cv-01395-JAM-AC Document 45 Filed 12/06/16 Page 1 of 8
 -2- 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the Stipulation of Settlement and Voluntary 

Dismissal dated December 1, 2016 of Plaintiff DAVID W. CALFEE, III and Defendants 

WILLIAM K. GRAHAM aka BILLY GRAHAM, THOMAS P. CHURCH aka TOM CHURCH, 

MICHELE A. CHURCH, MICHAEL U. SBROCCO III aka MIKE SBROCCO, all claims in this 

action, case no. 2:14-cv01395-JAM-AC, have been settled and all claims will be dismissed with 

prejudice upon this court retaining subject matter and personal jurisdiction for the purpose of 

enforcing the terms of the settlement. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that, 

1. In full settlement of all claims between Plaintiff and Defendants, Defendants shall 

pay Plaintiff the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) on or before January 2, 2017. 

2. Each party releases the other party from any and all claims, demands, liabilities and 

other obligation of every kind and nature, whether known or unknown, liquidated or unliquidated, 

whether sounding in contract, tort, equity or any other legal theory. This is a mutual general release 

and both parties expressly waive the protections otherwise offered by California Civil Code § 1542 

which provides as follows: 

A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to 

exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her 

must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor. 

3. Excepting this court’s jurisdiction to enforce this Order, the terms of the settlement 

shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws and decisions of the State of 

California. 

4. Each party shall execute a Settlement Agreement in the form attached hereto as 

Exhibit A on or before January 2, 2017. 

Case 2:14-cv-01395-JAM-AC Document 45 Filed 12/06/16 Page 2 of 8
 -3- 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in this action; 

provided, however, that the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ 

fees and costs incurred in any motion or any other proceeding brought by any party to enforce any 

part of the Stipulation dated December 1, 2016, the court’s Order of Settlement and Dismissal, or to 

determine any rights of any of the parties. This includes but is not limited to costs and attorneys’ 

fees incurred to bring a motion to enforce the settlement as well as any incurred to collect based upon 

this court’s Order of Settlement and Dismissal and/or to perfect the court’s Order into a judgment. 

6. All claims brought in this action are hereby dismissed with prejudice with this 

court retaining subject matter and personal jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing this Order 

and the terms of the settlement. 

Dated: 12/5/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez_____________ 

 JOHN A. MENDEZ 

United States District Court Judge 

 

Case 2:14-cv-01395-JAM-AC Document 45 Filed 12/06/16 Page 3 of 8
 -4- 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT A 

Case 2:14-cv-01395-JAM-AC Document 45 Filed 12/06/16 Page 4 of 8