Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05153/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05153-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E. & J. GALLO WINERY, a California CASE NO. CV-F-04-5153- LJO-DLB

corporation,

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S FURTHER

vs. REQUEST TO CONTINUE SUMMARY

JUDGMENT BRIEFING

CANTINE RALLO, S.p.A, (Doc. 285, 286.)

Defendant.

 /

Defendant Cantine Rallo, S.p.A. (“Rallo”), seeks to continue the summary judgment briefing

schedule on grounds of a pending global settlement of plaintiff E. & J. Gallo Winery’s (“Gallo’s”)

claims. Gallo indicates “there has been no progress, meaningful or otherwise, toward resolving the

outstanding issues.” Based on Gallo’s apparent pessimism toward global settlement, this Court is

unconvinced of benefits to again extend the briefing schedule. This Court DENIES Rallo’s request to

extend the summary judgment briefing schedule.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 16, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05153-LJO -DLB Document 287 Filed 04/16/07 Page 1 of 1