Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-91-03048/USCOURTS-ca10-91-03048-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 

---

FIL E D 

United Stat.es Court of Appeals 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

BRYANT STEWART, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v. 

RICHARD THORNBURGH; J.MICHAEL 

QUINLAN; GARY L. HENMAN; 

MAYOR, WASHINGTON, D.C., 

RespondentsAppellees. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

SEP O 5 1991 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 91-3048 

(D.C. No. 90-CV-3508-R) 

(D. Kansas) 

Before, LOGAN, MOORE, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. 

Petitioner Bryant Stewart was convicted of criminal violation 

of the District of Columbia Code and was subsequently transferred 

to the United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas (USPL), to 

serve his sentence. The district court denied his petition for 

habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Stewart v. 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 91-3048 Document: 010110084287 Date Filed: 09/05/1991 Page: 1 
Thornburgh, No. 90-3508-R (D. Kan. Jan. 25, 1991). Petitioner 

1 appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253. 

Each of the claims petitioner raises on appeal has been 

considered and was found to be lacking in merit in Blango v. 

Thornburgh, F.2d _, No. 91-3047 (10th Cir. Aug. 16, 1991). 

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District 

of Kansas is AFFIRMED. 

Entered for the Court. 

PER CURIAM 

1 In response to petitioner's notice of appeal, the district 

court found that the appeal was frivolous and not taken in good 

faith. Based on this finding, the court denied petitioner leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Dist. Ct. R. doc. 16. 

However, petitioner's motion for in forma pauperis status on 

appeal is hereby granted. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered 

submitted without oral argument. 

2 

Appellate Case: 91-3048 Document: 010110084287 Date Filed: 09/05/1991 Page: 2