Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AN CREW LLP

DANIEL J. FURSS (State Bar No. 73531), djfurniss((townsend.com 2 JOSEPH A. GRECO (State.Bar No. 104476),jagreco((townsend.com

3 IAN L. SAFFER (pro hac vice), ilsaffer((townsend.com

ROBERT D. TADLOCK (State Bar No. 238479), rdtadlock((townsend.com

4 379 Lytton Avenue

Palo Alto, California 94301

5 Telephone: (650) 326-2400

6 Facsimile: (650) 326-2422

7 FOUNTAIEAD LAW GROUP

CHAD R. WALSH (State Bar No. 214290), crwalsh((townsend.com

8 900 Lafayette Street, Suite 509

Santa Clara, Californa 95050

9 Telephone: (408) 244-6319

10 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

11 BUSINSS OBJECTS DATA INTEGRATION, INC.

12

13

14

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRACISCO DNISION

INORMATICA CORPORATION,

16 a Delaware corporation,

CASE NO. C 02 3378 JSW (JL)

(PROPOSED) ORDER GRATING

DEFENDANT BUSINESS OBJECTS

DEVELOPMENT, INC'S MOTION

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

TO FILE ONE SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION NOT TO

EXCEED FIFTY (50) PAGES

17 Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,

18 v.

19 BUSINSS OBJECTS DATA

INTEGRATION, INC., formerly known as

20 ACTA TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

a Delaware corporation,

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant and Counterclaimant.

On May 12, 2006, Defendant Business Objects Development, Inc. ("BODI") filed its Motion

for Administrative Relief to File One Sumary Judgment Motion Not to Exceed Fifty (50) Pages.

The Cour has read the papers submitted by the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,

(PROPOSED) ORDER GRATING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE

ONE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION NOT TO EXCEED 50 PAGES - CASE NO. C02 3378 JSW (JL)

- 1 -

Case 3:02-cv-03378-JSW Document 210 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 216 Filed 05/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

pages.

5

6

pages.

7

IT is HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. BODl's motion is GRATED.

2. BODI may file one summary judgment motion (including brief) not to exceed fifty (50)

Plaintiff Informatica Corporation's opposition brief to the motion shall not exceed fifty (50)

BODl's reply brief shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages.

3. The date for fiing summary judgment motions previously set (June 16,2006) and the

8 briefing schedule under the Civil Local Rules shall remain the same.

9

10

DATED:

11

12

13

60772922 vI

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jeffrey S. White

United States District Judge

(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE

ONE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION NOT TO EXCEED 50 PAGES - CASE NO. C02 3378 JSW (JL)

- 2 -

Case 3:02-cv-03378-JSW Document 210 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 2 of 2

IN PART. 30 30 17

 May 30, 2006

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 216 Filed 05/30/06 Page 2 of 2