Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-01120/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-01120-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN BIGOSKI ODOM,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. TAYLOR, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:20-cv-01120-ADA-CDB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS 

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 21)

Plaintiff Ryan Bigoski Odom (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 

this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 23, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, 

recommending that Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) 

and Unknown CDCR Contractor for Prosthetics be dismissed from this action, that the action 

proceed on Plaintiff’s claims alleging a violation of her Eighth Amendment rights against 

Defendants Taylor, Khoo, Antenello, Eznewugo, Mitchell and Singh for deliberate indifference to 

serious medical needs, and that all other claims and defendants should be dismissed from the action. 

(ECF No. 21.) The Magistrate Judge provided Plaintiff 14 days within which to file any objections 

to the findings and recommendations. (Id. at 7.) To date, no objections have been filed. 

///

Case 1:20-cv-01120-KES-CDB Document 22 Filed 03/20/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and 

recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly,

1. The findings and recommendations issued on January 23, 2023, (ECF No. 21), are 

ADOPTED in full;

2. That Defendants CDCR and Unknown CDCR Contractor for Prosthetics be 

DISMISSED; 

3. The claims in Plaintiff’s complaint are DISMISSED, except for the claim of deliberate 

indifference to serious medical needs against Defendants Taylor, Khoo, Antenello, 

Eznewugo, Mitchell and Singh; and 

4. The matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 20, 2023 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-01120-KES-CDB Document 22 Filed 03/20/23 Page 2 of 2