Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_12-cv-00780/USCOURTS-azd-4_12-cv-00780-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

SANDEE SMITH,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

HEWITT ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 12-780-TUC-CKJ

ORDER

On February 28, 2013, Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco issued a Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 14) in which he recommended Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc.

4) be granted. The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §636(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2), and LRCiv 7.2(e), any party may serve and file

written objections within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and also advised the parties that failure to file timely objections to any

factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge may be deemed a waiver of the

party’s right to de novo review of the issues. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 (2003). As of this date, no objections

have been filed.

Accordingly, after an independent review, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is ADOPTED.

2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is GRANTED.

3. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may

be granted.

Case 4:12-cv-00780-CKJ-BPV Document 15 Filed 03/20/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

4. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and shall then close its file in this

matter.

DATED this 20th day of March, 2013.

Case 4:12-cv-00780-CKJ-BPV Document 15 Filed 03/20/13 Page 2 of 2