Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04686/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04686-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation And Order For Dismissal

SIDNEY J. COHEN, ESQ., State Bar No. 39023

SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

427 Grand Avenue

Oakland, CA 94610

Telephone: (510) 893-6682 CHAMBERS COPY

Attorneys for Plaintiff DO NOT FILE

MICHAEL PAULICK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL PAULICK

Plaintiff,

V. 

ELISEO OAKS, L.P.;

and DOES 1-25, Inclusive, 

Defendants. /

CASE NO. C 09-04686 SBA

Civil Rights

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

FOR DISMISSAL

FRCP section 41 

Case 4:09-cv-04686-SBA Document 9 Filed 02/17/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation And Order For Dismissal -1-

Plaintiff Michael Paulick (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Eliseo Oaks,

L.P.(“Defendant”), by and through their attorneys of record, file this Stipulation of

Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure section 41.

Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on October 1, 2009.

Plaintiff and Defendant have entered into a “Mutual Release And Settlement

Agreement,” which settles all aspects of the lawsuit against Defendant. A copy of the

“Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement” is incorporated by reference herein

as if set forth in full. The “Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement “ states in part

that “The court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Settlement

Agreement, and this Settlement Agreement shall be incorporated by reference in the

Dismissal as if set forth in full.”

Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate to the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce

the “Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement.”

Plaintiff moves to dismiss with prejudice the lawsuit against Defendant.

Defendant, who has answered the complaint, agrees to the dismissal with

prejudice.

This case is not a class action, and no receiver has been appointed.

This Stipulation and Order may be signed in counterparts, and facsimile or

electronically transmitted signatures shall be as valid and as binding as original

signatures.

Wherefore, Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record,

so stipulate.

Date: 2/12/10 SIDNEY J. COHEN

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

/s/ Sidney J. Cohen

_____________________________

Sidney J. Cohen

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Michael Paulick

//

Case 4:09-cv-04686-SBA Document 9 Filed 02/17/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation And Order For Dismissal -2-

Date: February 9, 1010 PARKER & CROSLAND LLP

 /s/ C. Royda Crosland 

C. Royda Crosland

Attorney for Defendant

Eliseo Oaks, L.P.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED:

The lawsuit against Defendant is dismissed with prejudice. The Court shall

retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ “Mutual Release And Settlement

Agreement.” All disputes arising out of such agreement are REFERRED to the

Chief Magistrate Judge or her designee for determination.

Date: 2/16/10 

Saundra Brown Armstrong

United States District Judge

Case 4:09-cv-04686-SBA Document 9 Filed 02/17/10 Page 3 of 3