Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01794/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01794-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ramona Lopez, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

John E. Potter,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-1794-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Currently pending before this Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

(Doc. 54) and Statement of Facts (Doc. 57), Defendant’s Motion to Summarily Deny (Doc.

58) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 54), and Plaintiff’s Motions to Dismiss

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53, 60). Having considered the parties’

motions, the Court issues the following ruling.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING Defendant’s Motion to Summarily Deny

(Doc. 58) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED STRIKING Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (Doc. 54) and Statement of Facts (Doc. 57) pursuant to LR Civ 7.2(m), as they are

not authorized by the Court’s Orders (Doc 51, 55), Fed.R.Civ.P. 6 and 56 and LRCiv 7.2(e)

and 56.1(a) and (e).

///

///

///

///

Case 2:05-cv-01794-SMM Document 65 Filed 05/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Plaintiff was advised by Order of this Court as to what she must do to oppose a

motion for summary judgment, including which federal and local rules are applicable and

how to comply therewith. She was further advised that noncompliance with the rules may

be deemed a consent to the denial or granting of a dispositive motion and that the Court may

dispose of the motion summarily. (Doc. 55). Plaintiff has repeatedly failed to comply with

the Federal and Local Rules, thereby resulting in the instant order.

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions to Dismiss Defendant’s

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53, 60) are DENIED, as they do not comport with the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of this Court.1

DATED this 14th day of May, 2008.

Case 2:05-cv-01794-SMM Document 65 Filed 05/15/08 Page 2 of 2