Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00217/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00217-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAI THI VU,

Plaintiff/Petitioner,

v.

TINA HORNBEAK, et al.,

Defendants/Respondents.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:15-cv-01391-LJO-SKO

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO 

REDESIGNATE CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION

(550) AS A PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

HABEAS CORPUS (530) AND 

TRANSFERRING PETITION TO CENTRAL 

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(Doc. 1)

Plaintiff Mai Thi Vu (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 29, 2015, in the Northern District of California.

1

 

Based on Plaintiff’s allegation regarding a decision made by a unit classification committee at 

Central California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla, the case was transferred to this court on 

September 11, 2015.

Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at the California Institution for Women (“CIW”) in 

Corona and is serving a ten-year sentence following her conviction in Santa Clara Superior Court. 

She brings this action against Tina Hornbeak, Director of California Women’s Institutions; Jeffrey 

A. Beard, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation; and CIW 

Warden Kimberly Hughes. Plaintiff seeks to have her VIO code removed so that her custody 

status level will lowered from Medium A to Minimum A, which will allow her to qualify for 

 

1

Plaintiff paid the filing fee in the Northern District.

Case 2:16-cv-00217-TLN-GGH Document 10 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

additional time credits; and she also seeks to receive additional time credits pursuant to the 

November 14, 2014, order issued in Coleman, et al, v. Brown, et al., case number 2:90-cv-00520-

KJM-DAD PC.2

Plaintiff is not seeking damages; she is challenging her custody status as related to her 

credit-earning status, and she seeks the restoration of credits and/or increased credit-earning status, 

which affects the length of her ten-year determinate sentence. Nettles v. Grounds, 788 F.3d 992, 

998 (9th Cir. 2015) (citing Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500, 93 S.Ct. 1827 (1973)). As a 

result, Plaintiff is limited to seeking relief via a petition for writ of habeas corpus and this court 

lacks jurisdiction over said petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Venue for a habeas petition is proper in 

either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. Id. Because Plaintiff is challenging 

her custody classification by prison officials, which directly impacts her credit-earning status, and 

she is not challenging the fact of her conviction or sentence, her case shall be transferred to the 

Central District of California, where venue is proper based on her incarceration at CIW. Id.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk’s Office shall redesignate this civil rights action (550) as petition for writ 

of habeas corpus (530); and

2. The petition shall be transferred to the Central District of California. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

2 A VIO codes signifies an inmate who “has a current or prior conviction for a violent felony, or a sustained juvenile 

adjudication including, but not limited to, those listed under Penal Code section 667.5(c), which, as determined by the 

CSR, requires placement in a facility with a higher security level than that indicated by his/her placement score.” Cal. 

Code Regs., tit. 15, § 3375.2(b)(29). The code is “used to indicate those administrative or irregular placement 

conditions known as administrative determinants, which may be imposed by Departmental officials to override the 

placement of an inmate at a facility according to his/her placement score.” Tit. 15, § 3375.2(b).

Case 2:16-cv-00217-TLN-GGH Document 10 Filed 09/16/15 Page 2 of 2