Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03015/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03015-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

Order Regarding Production of Documents Following In Camera Inspection 355428.doc 

C05-03015 RS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

DONALD HUDSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITY OF SAN JOSE, SAN JOSE 

POLICE OFFICER J. FREITAS (BADGE 

NO. 3720), SAN JOSE POLICE 

OFFICER R. BRENNAN (BADGE NO. 

3841), SAN JOSE POLICE OFFICER 

GONZALEZ (BADGE NO. 3845), SAN 

JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND 

DOES 1-200, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

 

Case Number: C05-03015 RS 

ORDER REGARDING PRODUCTION 

OF DOCUMENTS FOLLOWING IN 

CAMERA INSPECTION

 Pursuant to a Stipulation of plaintiff and defendants, the Court conducted an in 

camera inspection of the personnel files of defendant officers Joseph Freitas, Ryan 

Brennan, and Pete Gonzalez on May 26, 2006. The Court, having reviewed the files, 

hereby orders production of the following documents only: Freitas file #3720, pp. 2-8; 

Internal Affairs Reports, pp. 3-50, 51-70. These documents will be produced subject to the 

following Protective Order: 

*E-FILED 5/26/06*

Case 5:05-cv-03015-RS Document 55 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 2
2 

Order Regarding Production of Documents Following In Camera Inspection 355428.doc 

C05-03015 RS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1. These documents are considered to be confidential and are to be used for 

the purpose of the above-captioned litigation only. Accordingly, the documents and/or 

their contents may only be disclosed by plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorneys on an as needed 

basis and may be disclosed for the purposes of this litigation only. These confidential 

documents shall not be disseminated to third parties and shall not be used in any other 

litigation. Photocopies of such documents shall not be made. Counsel will advise persons 

given access to any confidential documents, of the confidentiality of said documents. 

 2. Upon the conclusion of this litigation by final judgment, dismissal, or 

settlement, all such confidential documents shall be immediately returned to the Office of 

the City Attorney, 200 East Santa Clara Street, San Jose, California 95113-1905. 

 3. The transcript of any hearing on the record with regard to the in camera

inspection by the Court shall be sealed and only opened upon further order of the Court. 

 4. All documents to be produced pursuant to this Order shall be delivered to 

counsel for plaintiff on or before Tuesday, May 30, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: 

HON. RICHARD SEEBORG 

United States Magistrate Judge 

5/26/06

Case 5:05-cv-03015-RS Document 55 Filed 05/26/06 Page 2 of 2