Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01007/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01007-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1365 Environmental Matters

---

LAW OFFICES OF 

COX, CASTLE & 

NICHOLSON LLP 

SAN FRANCISCO 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-01007-RRB-GGH 

ROBERT P. DOTY (STATE BAR NO. 148069) 

STUART I. BLOCK (STATE BAR NO. 160688) 

LAURA S. BERNARD (STATE BAR NO. 197556) 

COX, CASTLE & NICHOLSON LLP 

555 California Street, 10th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 392-4200 

Facsimile: (415) 392-4250 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Thomas V. Fogarty and the 

Thomas V. and Mary R. Fogarty Revocable Trust 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THOMAS V. FOGARTY AND THE THOMAS 

V. AND MARY R. FOGARTY REVOCABLE 

TRUST, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

THE CITY OF CHICO, CALIFORNIA; BUTTE 

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; STEVE 

BERTAGNA; SCOTT GRUENDL; DAN 

HERBERT; ANDY HOLCOMBE; COLEEN 

JARVIS; MAUREEN KIRK; DANIEL 

NGUYEN-TAN; ANN SCHWAB; AND LARRY 

WAHL, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:06-cv-01007-RRB-GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING SCHEDULING ORDER 

DATES 

WHEREAS, on August 31, 2006, the Court issued a pre-trial scheduling order setting certain 

dates and cut-offs; 

WHEREAS, in May 2007, the City of Chico (“City”) requested that Plaintiffs agree to an 

extension of time for disclosure of expert witnesses and all other case deadlines; 

WHEREAS, in May 2007, the parties to this matter stipulated to extend certain dates on the 

case scheduling order, and on June 5, 2007, the Court approved the stipulation of the parties; 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-01007-JAM-GGH Document 32 Filed 09/18/07 Page 1 of 3
LAW OFFICES OF 

COX, CASTLE & 

NICHOLSON LLP 

SAN FRANCISCO 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-01007-RRB-GGH 

WHEREAS, in July 2007, the City requested that Plaintiffs agree to a three-month extension 

of all case deadlines, which Plaintiffs did not agree to and which the Court denied on the City’s ex 

parte application for an order extending dates; 

WHEREAS, in September 2007, Plaintiffs requested a two-week extension of the discovery 

deadline to complete depositions in this matter. The City agreed to the extension provided that the 

deadline for filing of and a hearing on dispositive motions similarly be extended by two weeks; 

WHEREAS, the parties now agree that two additional weeks are necessary to complete 

depositions and that therefore the dispositive motion deadlines will also need to be extended by two 

weeks; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and the City have agreed that mediation would be more productive 

following the hearing of dispositive motions and therefore the mediation date should also be 

rescheduled; 

WHEREAS, the pre-trial conference and trial dates will remain the same; 

WHEREAS, Butte County has no objections to these extensions; 

THEREFORE, all parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that the case schedule will 

be amended as follows: 

10/15/2007 Deadline for Completion of Discovery (all depositions taken, 

motions made and post motion follow-up done) 

11/16/2007 Deadline to File Dispositive Motions 

12/19/2007 @ 10 a.m. Hearing on Dispositive Motions 

1/11/2008 Deadline for Completion of Mediation 

1/18/2008 Joint Pre-Trial Conference Statement Due 

1/25/2008 @ 2 p.m. Final Pre-Trial Conference 

2/25/2008 @ 9 a.m. Trial 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-01007-JAM-GGH Document 32 Filed 09/18/07 Page 2 of 3
LAW OFFICES OF 

COX, CASTLE & 

NICHOLSON LLP 

SAN FRANCISCO 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-01007-RRB-GGH 

DATED: September ___, 2007 COX, CASTLE & NICHOLSON LLP 

By: /s/ 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Thomas V. Fogarty and 

the Thomas V. and Mary R. Fogarty Revocable 

Trust 

DATED: September ___, 2007 GOLDSBERRY, FREEMAN & GUZMAN, LLP 

By: _/s/__________________________________ 

Attorneys for Defendants The City of Chico, 

California; Steve Bertagna; Scott Gruendl; Dan 

Herbert; Andy Holcombe; Coleen Jarvis; Maureen 

Kirk; Daniel Nguyen-Tah; Ann Schwab; and Larry 

Wahl 

DATED: September ___, 2007 PORTER SCOTT 

By: /s/ 

Attorneys for Defendant County of Butte 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

By: /s/ Ralph R. Beistline____

Hon. Ralph R. Beistline 

U. S. District Judge 

51074\107664v1 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-01007-JAM-GGH Document 32 Filed 09/18/07 Page 3 of 3