Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00362/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00362-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERTO R. RECINO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UNKNOWN,

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:15-cv-00362-LJO-BAM (PC)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 

FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT 

ORDER AND FAILURE TO STATE A 

CLAIM

(ECF Nos. 14, 18)

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Roberto R. Recino (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On May 5, 2015, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend within 

thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file an amended 

complaint in compliance with the order, this action would be dismissed for failure to obey a 

court order and failure to state a claim. Plaintiff’s amended complaint was due on or before June 

8, 2015. (ECF No. 11.) On June 11, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff a fifteen-day extension of 

time to file his amended complaint. (ECF No. 18.) The deadline for Plaintiff to file his amended 

complaint has passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s order or otherwise 

contacted the Court. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon 

which relief may be granted. 

Case 1:15-cv-00362-LJO-BAM Document 19 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), IT IS HEREBY 

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to obey a court order 

and failure to state a claim. 

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District 

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 

fourteen (14) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may 

file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the “right to challenge the 

magistrate’s factual findings” on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 

2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 2, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00362-LJO-BAM Document 19 Filed 07/02/15 Page 2 of 2