Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02261/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02261-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, CASE NO. 14-cv-02261-JST

Barry Himmelstein, SBN 157736

E-mail: barry@himmellaw.com

HIMMELSTEIN LAW NETWORK

2000 Powell St., Ste. 1605

Emeryville, CA 94608

Telephone: (510) 450-0782

Facsimile: (510) 380-6147

Sheri L. Kelly, SBN 226993

E-mail: slk@sherikellylaw.com

LAW OFFICE OF SHERI L. KELLY

31 E. Julian St.

San Jose, CA 95112

Telephone: (408) 287-7712

Facsimile: (408) 583-4249

Attorneys for Plaintiff Margo Perryman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MARGO PERRYMAN individually, and for 

other persons similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP; OCWEN 

LOAN SERVICING LLC; SOUTHWEST 

BUSINESS CORPORATION; AMERICAN 

SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY;

AMERICAN MODERN HOME 

INSURANCE COMPANY; ALTISOURCE 

PORTFOLIO SOLUTIONS, S.A., BELTLINE 

ROAD INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.; and 

DOES 4-100,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:14-cv-02261-JST

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE AUGUST 

5, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE TO AUGUST 19, 2015; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Civil Local Rules 16(e), 7-12

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 203 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, CASE NO. 14-cv-02261-JST

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16(e) and 7-12, Plaintiff Margo Perryman (“Plaintiff”), and all of 

the Defendants – Litton Loan Servicing, LP (“Litton”), Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (“Ocwen”), 

American Security Insurance Company (“ASIC”), American Modern Home Insurance Company 

(“American Modern”), Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A. (“Altisource”), and Beltline Road 

Insurance Agency (“Beltline”), through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on May 6, 2015, this Court entered a scheduling order setting a further Case 

Management Conference for August 5, 2015, and required the parties to submit a joint Case 

Management Statement by July 22, 2015 (Dkt. No. 188);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel have an unavoidable conflict on August 5, 2015, and 

cannot appear for the conference on that date;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and all Defendants have conferred, and agree to stipulate to a brief 

continuance of the Case Management Conference to August 19, 2015.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject to 

the Court’s approval, the parties agree to the following:

• The Case Management Conference shall be continued to August 19, 2015;

• The parties’ Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed by August 5, 2015.

DATED: July 21, 2015 LAW OFFICE OF SHERI L. KELLY

By: /s/ Sheri L. Kelly

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 MARGO PERRYMAN

DATED: July 21, 2015 HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP

By: /s/ Jason J. Kim

Attorneys for Defendants

 OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC and 

 LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 203 Filed 07/21/15 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, CASE NO. 14-cv-02261-JST

DATED: July 21, 2015 BAKER HOSTETLER

By: /s/ Joseph Ezzie

 Attorneys for Defendant 

AMERICAN MODERN HOME 

 INSURANCE COMPANY

DATED: July 21, 2015 CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT

 By: /s/ W. Glenn Merten

 Attorneys for Defendant

 AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE 

 COMPANY

DATED: July 21, 2015 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN

 By: /s/ David W. Moon

 Attorneys for Defendants

 ALTISOURCE PORTFOLIO 

 SOLUTIONS, S.A., and BELTLINE 

 ROAD INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.

FILER’S ATTESTATION

I, Sheri L. Kelly, attest, pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from the other signatories to this document.

DATED: July 21, 2015 LAW OFFICE OF SHERI L. KELLY

Sheri L. Kelly

By: /s/ Sheri L. Kelly

 Sheri L. Kelly

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 MARGO PERRYMAN

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 203 Filed 07/21/15 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, CASE NO. 14-cv-02261-JST

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

• The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for August 5, 2015 is 

hereby continued to August 19, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.; and 

• The parties’ joint Case Management Statement shall be filed by August 5, 2015.

DATED:

__________________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

 United States District Judge

July 21, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 203 Filed 07/21/15 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, CASE NO. 14-cv-02261-JST

DECLARATION OF SHERI L. KELLY

I, Sheri L. Kelly, declare as follows:

1. I am counsel of record for Plaintiff Margo Perryman in this matter. I have personal 

knowledge of the matters set forth herein, and if called upon to do so, could and would testify 

competently thereto. I submit this declaration in support of Plaintiff Margo Perryman (“Plaintiff”) 

and all of the Defendants’ Stipulation to continue the Case Management Conference.

2. Plaintiff’s counsel have an unavoidable scheduling conflict, and will not be able to 

attend the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for August 5, 2015.

3. Defendants Ocwen, Litton, ASIC, and SWBC each have obtained extensions of 

time in which to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint via stipulation. Dkt. Nos. 24, 30, 41, 111. 

Defendant Beltline sought and obtained an order extending the time in which it may respond to 

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, and Plaintiff and Beltline obtained extensions to file their 

respective response and reply. Dkt. Nos. 119, 134, 148. Defendant Altisource sought and 

obtained an order extending the time in which to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint 

(“FAC”). Dkt. No. 172. Plaintiff and Ocwen also stipulated to extend the briefing schedule for 

Ocwen’s motion to stay. Dkt. Nos. 139, 142, 144, and 154.

4. The schedule proposed in this Stipulation will not affect any other deadlines 

currently scheduled by the Court.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on July 21, 2015, at San Jose, California.

By: /s/ Sheri L. Kelly

Sheri L. Kelly

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 203 Filed 07/21/15 Page 5 of 5