Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03836/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03836-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NSIGHT, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

PEOPLESOFT, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. 3:04 CV 3836 MMC (MEJ)

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST

FOR DOCUMENTS

The Court is in receipt of the parties' Joint Meet and Confer Letter Regarding nSight's

Document Requests (Letter No. 4 of 4), filed May 9, 2006. Doc. #123. In the letter, plaintiff nSight,

Inc. seeks an order compelling defendant Oracle USA, Inc. to either produce documents in response

to its August 26, 2005 request for documents, or to serve a declaration attesting that the requested

documents do not exist. In response, Oracle argues that it has produced the documents in its

possession, but is unable to produce other documents that were not maintained. Upon review of the

parties' arguments, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: Oracle shall serve on nSight a declaration

(1) attesting that it has produced all non-privileged documents within its possession, custody, or

control; and (2) confirming that it conducted a diligent search of all locations at which such

materials might plausibly exist. Oracle shall serve its declaration within ten days from the date of

this Order. Oracle is hereby precluded from using as evidence any non-privileged documents it did

not produce in response to nSight's production request.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 11, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03836-MMC Document 127 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 1