Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01234/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01234-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REGINALD RAY YORK,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:14-cv-01234-LJO-SKO (PC)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR SERVICE BY THE USM

(Doc. 18)

Plaintiff Reginald Ray York (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act 

(“ADA”)) on August 6, 2014. On July 28, 2015, the Court authorized service of Plaintiff’s second 

amended complaint and directed Plaintiff to effect service within one-hundred twenty days.1 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A; Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. On September 28, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking 

service by the United States Marshal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). 

///

///

///

///

///

 

1

Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis and is therefore not entitled to rely on the United States Marshal for 

service. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3).

Case 1:14-cv-01234-LJO-GSA Document 19 Filed 10/02/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff’s motion. Id. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 

4(c)(2), the United States Marshal will be directed to initiate service of Plaintiff’s second amended 

complaint on Defendants Beard, Davey, and Arlitz.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 2, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01234-LJO-GSA Document 19 Filed 10/02/15 Page 2 of 2