Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00887/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00887-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS A. HIGHTOWER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0887 GEB GGH P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On July 5, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the

May 19, 2005, order by the magistrate judge denying his request

for certification of his appeal. The court construes plaintiff’s

objections to be a request for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D.

Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of

the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to

law.

Case 2:04-cv-00887-GEB-GGH Document 41 Filed 07/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon

reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed May 19,

2005, is affirmed. 

Dated: July 22, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00887-GEB-GGH Document 41 Filed 07/25/05 Page 2 of 2