Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-02319/USCOURTS-ca4-19-02319-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2319

In re: PHILIP JAY FETNER,

Debtor.

---------------------------------------

PHILIP JAY FETNER,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

HOTEL STREET CAPITAL, L.L.C.; STEPHEN S. ROSZEL,

Creditors - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00933-AJT-IDD)

Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: April 20, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip Jay Fetner, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Marino, REDMOND, PEYTON & 

BRASWELL, Alexandria, Virginia; William Davis Ashwell, MARK B. WILLIAMS & 

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2319 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/20/2020 Pg: 1 of 3
2

ASSOCIATES, PLC., Warrenton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2319 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/20/2020 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Jay Fetner appeals the district court’s orders affirming the bankruptcy court’s 

denial of his second motion to extend the exclusivity period to file a Chapter 11 plan and 

denying reconsideration. Before Fetner noted this appeal, the bankruptcy court entered an 

order converting Fetner’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding to one under Chapter 7. 

Because the bankruptcy case has been converted, we cannot afford Fetner any effective 

relief. In the context of a bankruptcy proceeding, a court may dismiss an appeal as 

equitably moot where it would be “impractical or imprudent” to disturb the bankruptcy 

court’s order. In re U.S. Airways Group, Inc., 369 F.3d 806, 809 (4th Cir. 2004) (internal 

quotation marks omitted); see In re Stadium Mgmt. Corp., 895 F.2d 845, 847 (1st Cir. 

1990) (“Absent a stay [of a bankruptcy court transaction or proceeding], the court must 

dismiss a pending appeal as moot because the court has no remedy that it can fashion even 

if it would have determined the issues differently.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal 

as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-2319 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/20/2020 Pg: 3 of 3