Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00133/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00133-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTIONE L. ARDDS,

Plaintiff,

v.

KENNETH MARTIN, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:20-cv-00133-TLN-KJN

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 28, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 43.) Plaintiff 

filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 44.) Defendants did not file a 

reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

Case 2:20-cv-00133-TLN-CSK Document 47 Filed 07/19/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 28, 2022, (ECF No. 43), are adopted in 

full;

2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 36), is GRANTED in part and 

DENIED in part; 

3. Plaintiff’s retaliation claims are DISMISSED without prejudice; 

4. Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; and 

5. Within thirty days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended 

Complaint raising only Eighth Amendment claims based on those allegations set forth in 

grievance CHCF-HC-20-000548 against only those individuals who were part of the IDTT 

referenced therein.

DATED: July 18, 2022

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge

Case 2:20-cv-00133-TLN-CSK Document 47 Filed 07/19/22 Page 2 of 2