Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00385/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00385-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

-1-

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO.: C15-00385 VC

P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\GR Clark\Pleadings\Complaint\Joint Request to Continue Initial Case Management Conference_42115.doc

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)

Adrian L. Canzoneri, Esq. (SBN 265168)

SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110

San Francisco, CA 94104

(415) 882-7900

(415) 882-9287 – Facsimile

mstafford@sjlawcorp.com

acanzoneri@sjlawcorp.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Jeffrey S. Kaufman, Esq. (SBN 122569)

Susan E. Bishop, Esq. (SBN 187253)

BERLINER COHEN

Ten Almaden Blvd., 11th Floor

San Jose, CA 95113

(408) 286-5800

(408) 998-5388 – Facsimile 

jsk@berliner.com

susan.bishop@berliner.com

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUSSELL E. BURNS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

G.R. CLARK, INC., a California corporation; 

GORDON RAYMOND CLARK, an 

Individual; and DENNIS GORDON CLARK, 

an Individual,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:15-cv-00385-VC

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

THEREON

Date: April 28, 2015

Time: 2:30 p.m.

Dept.: Courtroom 4, 17th Floor

 450 Golden Gate Ave.

 San Francisco, CA

Judge: Honorable Vince Chhabria

Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby 

respectfully request that the Initial Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for April 

28, 2015, be continued for approximately forty-five (45) days, or as soon thereafter as may be 

convenient for the Court. GOOD CAUSE exists for the requested continuance as follows:

1. As the Court’s records will reflect, this action was filed by Plaintiffs on January 27, 

2015 [Dkt. No. 1] to compel Defendants’ compliance with its obligations to pay monthly 

Case 3:15-cv-00385-VC Document 20 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 3
-2-

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO.: C15-00385 VC

P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\GR Clark\Pleadings\Complaint\Joint Request to Continue Initial Case Management Conference_42115.doc

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

employee contributions to Plaintiffs, along with payment of amounts found due in an audit 

inspection of Defendants’ payroll records, pursuant to Defendants’ Collective Bargaining 

Agreement. 

2. Defendants filed an Answer to the Complaint on February 25, 2015 [Dkt. No. 14]. 

3. Counsel for both Plaintiffs and Defendants are currently engaged in preliminary 

discussions towards potential resolution of this matter.

4. The parties have an ADR Phone Conference with the Court’s Alternative Dispute 

Resolution Program scheduled for April 22, 2015 [Dkt. No. 17]. 

5. The parties jointly request a continuance of the Case Management Conference so as 

to allow the parties to further facilitate settlement of this matter, as both parties desire to resolve 

this matter without the need for further litigation. 

6. This is the first such request made by either party to this matter.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:15-cv-00385-VC Document 20 Filed 04/23/15 Page 2 of 3
-3-

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO.: C15-00385 VC

P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\GR Clark\Pleadings\Complaint\Joint Request to Continue Initial Case Management Conference_42115.doc

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7. There are no issues that need to be addressed by the parties at the currently 

scheduled Initial Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs, as well as the 

Court’s time and resources, Plaintiffs and Defendants jointly and respectfully request that the 

Initial Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for April 28, 2015, be continued for 

approximately forty-five (45) days, to allow sufficient time for the parties to continue their 

attempts to resolve this matter outside of litigation. 

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 21, 2015 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON

LAW CORPORATION

By: ___________/S/______________

Adrian L. Canzoneri

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: April 21, 2015 BERLINER COHEN

By: ___________/S/______________

Susan E. Bishop,

Attorney for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Initial Case 

Management Conference is hereby continued to ___________, at _________. All related 

deadlines are extended accordingly.

Date: ___________________ ___________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

June 16, 2015 10:00 a.m. April 23, 2015

Case 3:15-cv-00385-VC Document 20 Filed 04/23/15 Page 3 of 3