Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01201/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01201-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 On November 24, 2004, plaintiff paid the $150.00 filing fee. However, on August 24, 1

2006, $350.00 was submitted to the court as an additional filing fee. Plaintiff is advised that the

filing fee for this case is $150.00 and he may request a refund from the Financial Office of this

court. Plaintiff should provide the case file number, the name of the person who should receive

the refund and the mailing address.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY A. PATE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1201 FCD DAD P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFFS DEPUTIES,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. 

1

On November 15, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff to file his proof of service

reflecting that service had been completed on defendant Garcia, the sole defendant in this action,

or to show cause why service has not been completed. On January 5, 2006, the court provided

plaintiff with an additional fifteen days to file his proof of service. Alternatively, the court

Case 2:04-cv-01201-FCD-DAD Document 31 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 On July 5, 2006, plaintiff filed a letter to the court indicating that his mother would be 2

submitted the $350.00 filing fee. Attached to the letter was a trust account statement and the

second page of the in forma pauperis application.

2

informed plaintiff that if he submitted an application requesting leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the application was granted, the court would order the U.S. Marshal to serve

process on defendant Garcia. Plaintiff has submitted neither the proof of service not a proper

application to proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, the court will again order plaintiff to file 2

his proof of service reflecting that service on defendant Garcia has been completed. If service

has not been completed, this action will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days from the service

of this order, plaintiff shall file his proof of service reflecting that defendant Garcia has been

served with the summons and second amended complaint. Failure to comply with this order will

result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DATED: September 8, 2006.

DAD:4

pate1201.pos2

Case 2:04-cv-01201-FCD-DAD Document 31 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 2