Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03181/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03181-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jeffrey S. Abraham, pro hac vice

Jabraham@aftlaw.com

Lawrence D. Levit

Llevit@aftlaw.com

David M. Weinberger

Dweinberger@aftlaw.com

ABRAHAM FRUCHTER & TWERSKY LLP

One Penn Plaza, Suite 2805

New York, N.Y. 10019

Telephone: (212) 279-5050

Facsimile: (212) 279-3655

Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel

Lionel Z. Glancy (CSB No. 134180)

Jglancy@glancylaw.com

GLANCY, BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP

1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Telephone: (310) 201-9150

Facsimile: (310) 201-9160

Plaintiffs’ Local Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE INVISION TECHNOLOGIES,

INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

CASE NO. C-04-3181 (MJJ)

CLASS ACTION

Hon. Martin J. Jenkins

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

AMENDED CONSOLIDATED

COMPLAINT AND SCHEDULING OF

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

This Document Relates To:

All Actions.

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 68 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 70 Filed 11/03/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This Stipulation is entered into by and among Lead Plaintiffs Glazer Capital

Management, LP and Glazer Offshore Fund, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs” or the

“Glazer Funds”) and defendants InVision Technologies, Inc. (“InVision”), Sergio Magistri and

Ross Mulholland (collectively, “Defendant”), by and through their respective attorneys of record.

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s April 25, 2005 Order Regarding Briefing Schedule

(the “April Order”), on or about May 24, 2005, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’

Amended Consolidated Complaint;

WHEREAS, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss was briefed by the parties, and pursuant to

the April Order, was scheduled for a hearing on July 26, 2005;

WHEREAS, Defendants’ counsel informed Plaintiffs’ counsel that they were unable to

attend a hearing on July 26, 2005, and the parties entered into a Stipulation, approved by the

Court, setting the hearing for September 20, 2005;

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss was adjourned by the Court

to November 15, 2005, and the Case Management Conference was adjourned to December 6,

2005 at 2:00 p.m.;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel cannot be present on November 15, 2005 at 9:30 a.m.

because of a two-day mediation in Philadelphia, PA. that was scheduled for November 14-15;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rules

6-1 and 7-12, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, that:

(1) The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be held on November

29, 2005 at 9:30 a.m., or such other date as the Court may find convenient;

(2) The Case Management Conference shall be rescheduled for December 20,

2005 at 2:00 p.m., or such other later date as the Court may find convenient, with the parties to

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 68 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 2 of 3

January

10, 2006

February 14,

2006

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 70 Filed 11/03/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

file a Joint Case Management Statement pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9 ten days prior to the

Case Management Conference.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule

6-1 and 7-12, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, that the parties may enter

into and submit a further appropriate stipulation amending this filing.

Dated: October 28, 2005 FENWICK & WEST LLP

By:_____S/Tanya Herrera___________

Tanya Herrera

Attorneys for Defendants InVision Technologies,

Inc., Sergio Magistri and Ross Mulholland

Dated: October 28, 2005 ABRAHAM FRUCHTER & TWERSKY LLP

By: __s/Jeffrey S. Abraham_____________

Jeffrey S. Abraham

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

Dated: October 28, 2005 GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG, LLP

By:___s/Lionel Z. Glancy__________

Lionel Z. Glancy

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: ____________, 2005

__________________________________

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 68 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 3 of 3

11/3

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 70 Filed 11/03/05 Page 3 of 3