Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00256/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00256-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GILBERTO Z. RASCON,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

CHECKCARE ENTERPRISES,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 06-0256 PJH (MEJ)

NOTICE OF REFERENCE

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The above-captioned case was referred to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James for purposes

of discovery. Please be advised that if a specific motion was filed before the district court prior to

this referral, the noticed date will no longer be in effect. Rather, the parties shall comply with Judge

James’ Standing Order Regarding Discovery and Dispute Procedures, a copy of which may be

obtained from the Northern District of California's website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/

From the homepage, click on the "Judges" tab on the left margin, then choose Magistrate Judge

James. 

Counsel are advised that in regard to any pending discovery disputes, they must comply with

Judge James’ standing order and meet and confer in person. If the parties are unable to resolve their

dispute after the meet and confer session, they shall file a joint meet and confer letter. A separate

Case 4:06-cv-00256-PJH Document 14 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

letter should be filed for each dispute. Upon careful review of the parties’ letter, the Court will

either order further briefing, oral argument, or deem the matter submitted on the papers. 

Accordingly, any pending discovery motions are hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the

filing of a joint letter. Further, any proposed protective orders must comply with Civil Local Rule

79-5.

When filing papers that require the Court to take any action (e.g. motions, meet and confer

letters, administrative requests), the parties shall, in addition to filing papers electronically, lodge

with chambers a printed copy of the papers by the close of the next court day following the day the

papers are filed electronically. These printed copies shall be marked “Chambers Copy” and shall be

submitted to the Clerk’s Office, in an envelope clearly marked with Judge James’ name, case

number and “E-Filing Chambers Copy.” Parties shall not file a paper copy of any document with

the Clerk’s Office that has already been filed electronically. Any proposed orders must also be

emailed in Word or Wordperfect format to: mejpo@cand.uscourts.gov

Please contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Brenda Tolbert, at (415) 522-4708 with any

questions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 13, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:06-cv-00256-PJH Document 14 Filed 04/13/06 Page 2 of 2