Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04615/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04615-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE

HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. C05-04615 JF (HRL)ı

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Katherine D. Prescott (CSB No. 215496/prescott@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello St., Suite 500

Redwood City, CA 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Nagendra Setty (Admitted Pro Hac Vice/setty@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

1230 Peachtree Street, 19th Floor

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Telephone: (404) 892-5005

Facsimile: (404) 892-5002

Attorneys for Plaintiff

AIRDEFENSE, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN JOSE DIVISION)

AIRDEFENSE, INC., a Georgia corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

AIRTIGHT NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-04615 JF (HRL)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO RESCHEDULE HEARING

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN the parties and their respective

counsel that, subject to the approval of this Court, the Hearing on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss

Complaint currently scheduled for April 28, 2006, 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable Jeremy Fogel

be continued to June 9, 2006 at 9:00 a.m.

Dated: March 7, 2006

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Katherine D. Prescott_________

Katherine D. Prescott

Attorneys for Plaintiff

AIRDEFENSE, INC.

Dated: March 7, 2006

WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH, & ROSATI

By: ______/s/ Tait Graves _____________

Tait Graves

Attorneys for Defendant

AIRTIGHT NETWORK, INC.

**E-filed 3/9/06**

Case 5:05-cv-04615-JF Document 24 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 2
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE

HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. C05-04615 JF (HRL)ı

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel

United States District Court Judge

DECLARATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Tait

Graves.

Dated: March 7, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Katherine D. Prescott

Katherine D. Prescott

Attorneys for Plaintiff

AIRDEFENSE, INC.

50333284.doc

3/9/06

Case 5:05-cv-04615-JF Document 24 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 2