Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04821/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04821-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

-1-

REQUEST AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

14-cv-04821-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Nathan L. Scheg, SBN 197282

IRONHORSE LAW GROUP, PC

1820 Bonanza Street, Ste. 200

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

(925) 399-6108 Phone

(925) 215-8427 eFax

Attorneys for Plaintiff Christina Verhoek

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTINA VERHOEK, an 

individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, a business entity of 

unknown form; U.S. BANK HOME 

MORTGAGE, a business entity of 

unknown form; and DOES 1-50,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 14-cv-04821-EMC

[Assigned to the Honorable Edward M. 

Chen]

REQUEST AND STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO FILE FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

[filed: September 30, 2014]

TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN 

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF 

RECORD:

Defendant US Bank N.A. (also erroneously sued as U.S. Bank Home 

Mortgage) (“US Bank”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Christina Verhoek 

(“Verhoek”)’s Complaint. At the hearing on the motion to dismiss held on January 

29, 2015, the Court and the parties discussed the timeline pled in the Complaint 

regarding the loan modification submission, trial period plan offer and denial of a 

permanent modification. The Court granted Verhoek leave to amend the complaint 

to address some of the issues raised at the hearing. US Bank has subsequently sent 

Case 3:14-cv-04821-EMC Document 31 Filed 03/05/15 Page 1 of 2 Case3:14-cv-04821-EMC Document30 Filed02/26/15 Page1 of 2
-2-

REQUEST AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

14-cv-04821-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Verhoek documents showing what it claims is the true timeline of submissions and 

indicated its belief that the Complaint contained material misrepresentations in 

violation of FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 11(b). Verhoek’s counsel 

needs additional time to review the documents before filing a First Amended 

Complaint. US Bank and Verhoek have stipulated to extend Verhoek’s time to file 

a First Amended Complaint. 

The parties therefore stipulate and agree that, with the Court’s permission and 

order, Verhoek’s time to file a First Amended Complaint is continued to March 6, 

2015. US Bank shall have 21 days from the filing of the First Amended Complaint 

to respond to it, including through a motion to dismiss. US Bank has not waived 

any objection to the venue or to the jurisdiction of the court over the person of the 

defendant, or any other challenge to the complaint or other pleadings in this case.

DATED: February 25, 2015

By /s/ Frederick A. Haist

E. SCOTT PALMER

FREDERICK A. HAIST

PALMER, LOMBARDI & DONOHUE LLP

Attorneys for US Bank N.A.

DATED: February 25, 2015

By /s/ Nathan L. Scheg

NATHAN L. SCHEG

IRONHORSE LAW GROUP, PC 

Attorneys for Christina Verhoek

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____________, 2015 _________________________________

United States District Court Judge

Case3:14-cv-04821-EMC Document30 Filed02/26/15 Page2 of 2

3/5

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-04821-EMC Document 31 Filed 03/05/15 Page 2 of 2