Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03828/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03828-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

03740.51469/3421718.1 Case No. C 09-03828-RS (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR SERVING INVALIDITY 

CONTENTIONS AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCLOSURES

DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP 

 Michael E. Dergosits(SBN 118206) 

 Teddy K. Joe (SBN 242589) 

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 705-6377 

Facsimile: (415) 750-6383 

Email: mdergosits@dergnoah.com 

Email: tjoe@dergnoah.com 

GOLDSTEIN FAUCETT & PREBEG, LLP 

 Matthew J.M. Prebeg (pro hac vice) 

 Edward W. Goldstein(pro hac vice) 

 Holly H. Barnes (pro hac vice) 

1177 West Loop South, Suite 400 

Houston, Texas 77027 

Telephone: (713) 877-1515 

Facsimile: (713) 877-1737 

Email: mprebeg@gfpiplaw.com 

Email egoldstein@gfpiplaw.com 

Email: hbarnes@gfpiplaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

YIELDBOOST TECH, INC. 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

 Claude M. Stern (SBN 96737) 

 Robert B. Wilson (pro hac vice) 

 Jesse Geraci (SBN 259755) 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Main No.: (650) 801-5000 

Fax No.: (650) 801-5100 

Email: claudestern@quinnemanuel.com 

Email: robertwilson@quinnemanuel.com 

Email: jessegeraci@quinnemanuel.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC. and 

ORBOTECH, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

YIELDBOOST TECH, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC. AND 

ORBOTECH, INC., 

 Defendants. 

No. C 09-03828 RS (PVT) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 

TO ENLARGE TIME FOR SERVING 

INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND 

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 

DISCLOSURES 

*E-Filed 4/7/10*

Case 5:09-cv-03828-RS Document 78 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

03740.51469/3421718.1 -1- Case No. No. C 09-03828-RS (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR SERVING INVALIDITY

CONTENTIONS AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCLOSURES

WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference was held for this case on January 20, 2010, 

and the parties filed an Amended Joint Case Management Statement (Dkt. No. 36); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Case Management Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 37), 

Defendants, Photon Dynamics, Inc. and Orbotech, Inc., were to serve their invalidity contentions 

and accompanying documents under Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 on or before April 5, 2010; 

WHEREAS, on February 19, 2010, the parties filed a Stipulated Request for Order 

Enlarging Time Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 (Dkt. No. 42), and on February 22, 2010 the Court 

granted the parties’ request (Dkt. No. 43); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Order (Dkt. No. 43), Defendants, Photon Dynamics, 

Inc. and Orbotech, Inc., are to serve their invalidity contentions and accompanying documents 

under Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 on or before April 9, 2010; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Case Management Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 37), the parties 

are to exchange proposed terms for construction, pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-1, on or before April 

15, 2010; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Case Management Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 37), the parties 

are to exchange preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence, pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-

2, on or before May 5, 2010; 

WHEREAS, on March 17, 2010 Defendants filed a Motion to Extend the Time for Serving 

Invalidity Contentions and Claim Construction Deadlines Pending a Ruling on Defendants’ 

Motion To Compel Infringement Contentions that Comply with Patent L.R. 3-1 (Dkt. No. 49) 

(hereinafter “Defendants’ Motion to Extend Time”), wherein Defendants requested an extension 

of the deadlines for invalidity contentions and claim construction disclosures which depends upon 

the date that Defendants receive adequate infringement contentions; 

WHEREAS, on March 23, 2010 Plaintiff filed an Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to 

Extend Time (Dkt. No. 60), wherein Plaintiff opposed an extension of the deadlines for invalidity 

contentions and claim construction disclosures which depends upon receipt of adequate 

infringement contentions, but did not oppose a fixed extension of 21 days; 

WHEREAS, the Court has not ruled on Defendants’ Motion to Extend Time; 

Case 5:09-cv-03828-RS Document 78 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

03740.51469/3421718.1 -2- Case No. No. C 09-03828-RS (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR SERVING INVALIDITY

CONTENTIONS AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCLOSURES

WHEREAS, the undersigned counsel, met, conferred and agreed that the dates for service 

of invalidity contentions and exchange of claim construction disclosures should be extended, 

pending resolution of Defendants’ Motion to Extend Time, by 21 days as follows: 

Event Old Deadline New Deadline 

Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions 

(Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4) April 9, 2010 April 30, 2010 

Exchange of Proposed Terms for 

Construction (Patent L.R. 4-1) April 15, 2010 May 6, 2010 

Exchange of Preliminary Claim 

Constructions and Extrinsic 

Evidence (Patent L.R. 4-2) 

May 5, 2010 May 26, 2010 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED, AGREED AND ORDERED that until the 

Court rules on Defendants’ Motion to Extend Time (Dkt. No. 49), the date for serving invalidity 

contentions shall be extended to April 30, 2010, the date for exchanging proposed terms for 

construction shall be extended to May 6, 2010, and the date for exchanging preliminary claim 

constructions and extrinsic evidence shall be extended to May 26, 2010. 

Dated: April 6, 2010

By: /s/ Jesse Geraci

Jesse Geraci

 Attorneys for Defendants 

PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC. and 

ORBOTECH, INC. Dated: April 6, 2010

By: /s/ Holly H. Barnes

 Holly H. Barnes

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

YIELDBOOST TECH, INC.

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Holly 

Barnes. 

Dated: April 6, 2010

By: /s/ Jesse Geraci

Jesse Geraci

Case 5:09-cv-03828-RS Document 78 Filed 04/07/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

03740.51469/3421718.1 -3- Case No. No. C 09-03828-RS (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR SERVING INVALIDITY

CONTENTIONS AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCLOSURES

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _______________, 2010 

 Hon. Richard Seeborg 

United States District Judge 

4/7

Case 5:09-cv-03828-RS Document 78 Filed 04/07/10 Page 4 of 4