Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01669/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01669-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C-07-1669 MMC NOTICE OF STIPULATED CONTINUANCE OF HEARING FOR 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION 

AND JOINT STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

ROBERT L. SHERMAN PRO HAC VICE (New York Bar No. 1189521) 

SARA J. CRISAFULLI PRO HAC VICE (New York Bar No. 4343976) 

75 East 55th Street 

New York, NY 10022 

Telephone: (212) 318-6000 

Facsimile: (212) 319-4090 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

MARK E. MCKEEN (Bar No. 130950) 

SEAN D. UNGER (Bar No. 231694) 

T. LEE KISSMAN (Bar No. 233434) 

55 Second Street 

Twenty-Fourth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 

Telephone: (415) 856-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 

Attorneys for Defendants 

L’ORÉAL USA, INC. and 

L’ORÉAL S.A. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

BARE ESCENTUALS BEAUTY, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

L’ORÉAL USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

and L’ORÉAL S.A., a French Société Anonyme 

Defendants. 

Case No. C-07-1669 MMC 

NOTICE OF STIPULATED 

CONTINUANCE OF HEARING FOR 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF 

PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND JOINT 

STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL 

DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-7(a) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29, the parties jointly 

agree and stipulate to the following schedule for jurisdictional discovery to be taken by Plaintiff 

Bare Escentuals Beauty, Inc. (“Bare Escentuals”) concerning L’Oréal S.A.’s pending Motion to 

Case 3:07-cv-01669-MMC Document 42 Filed 10/12/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C-07-1669 MMC 2 NOTICE OF STIPULATED CONTINUANCE OF HEARING FOR 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION 

AND JOINT STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (“Motion to Dismiss’), and to continue the hearing date for 

the pending motion as set forth below. 

1. No later than October 15, 2007, Plaintiff shall serve up to ten interrogatories and 25 

document requests each to L’Oréal S.A. and L’Oréal USA, Inc., limited to the jurisdictional issues 

relevant to L’Oréal S.A.’s Motion to Dismiss. L’Oréal S.A. and L’Oréal USA, Inc. will respond to 

the interrogatories and document requests no later than November 19, 2007. 

2. If Plaintiff serves document requests by Monday, October 15, 2007, and those 

requests are limited to the issues relevant to L'Oréal S.A.’s Motion to Dismiss, Defendants, without 

waiving any arguments, rights, privileges, or objections (or the right to stand on their 

objections), will use diligent efforts to complete production of responsive, non-privileged documents 

for those limited requests by November 30, 2007. 

3. The parties agree and stipulate that Plaintiff shall take up to two depositions each of 

Defendants L’Oréal S.A. and L’Oréal USA, Inc. concerning only jurisdictional issues relevant to 

L’Oréal S.A.’s Motion to Dismiss. All four depositions shall be limited to four (4) hours per 

deponent. All four depositions shall be completed no later than January 15, 2008. 

4. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-7(a), L’Oréal S.A. hereby continues the hearing date for its 

Motion to Dismiss to February 29, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7 of the above-entitled court in 

order to allow time for this jurisdictional discovery. Bare Escentuals’s opposition to the Motion to 

Dismiss shall be filed by February 1, 2008 and L’Oréal S.A.’s reply shall be filed by February 15, 

2008. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: October 11, 2007 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

 

 By: /s/Sean D. Unger 

 Robert L. Sherman (pro hac vice) 

 Sara J. Crisafulli (pro hac vice) 

 75 East 55th Street 

 New York, NY 10022 

 Telephone: 212-318-6000 

 

 and 

Case 3:07-cv-01669-MMC Document 42 Filed 10/12/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C-07-1669 MMC 3 NOTICE OF STIPULATED CONTINUANCE OF HEARING FOR 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION 

AND JOINT STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Mark E. McKeen (SBN 130950) 

 Sean D. Unger (SBN 231694) 

 T. Lee Kissman (SBN 233434) 

 55 Second Street 

 Twenty-Fourth Floor 

 San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 

 Telephone: 415-856-7000 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 L’ORÉAL USA, INC. and L’ORÉAL S.A. 

DATED: October 11, 2007 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

 By: /s/ Jennifer A. Golinveaux 

 Andrew P. Bridges (SBN 122761) 

 Jennifer A. Golinveaux (SBN 203056) 

Joseph M. Morris (SBN: 245000) 

 101 California Street 

 San Francisco, CA 94111 

 Tel: 415-591-1506 

 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 BARE ESCENTUALS BEAUTY, INC. 

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Jennifer A. 

Golinveaux. 

By: /s/ Sean D. Unger 

Sean D. Unger 

Attorneys for Defendant 

L’ORÉAL S.A. 

SF:184601.3 

Case 3:07-cv-01669-MMC Document 42 Filed 10/12/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C-07-1669 MMC 4 NOTICE OF STIPULATED CONTINUANCE OF HEARING FOR 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION 

AND JOINT STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall engage in jurisdictional 

discovery as follows: 

• By no later than October 15, 2007, Plaintiff may serve up to ten interrogatories and 25 

document requests to each of the two Defendants concerning the jurisdictional issues 

raised in L’Oréal S.A.’s Motion to Dismiss. L’Oréal S.A. and L’Oréal USA, Inc. will 

respond to the interrogatories and document requests by no later than November 19, 

2007. Plaintiff shall take no more than two depositions each of Defendants L’Oréal USA 

and L’Oréal S.A., to be completed by January 15, 2008. Each deposition shall be limited 

to the jurisdictional issues relevant to L’Oréal S.A.’s Motion to Dismiss and shall be 

limited to four (4) hours per deponent. 

• The hearing date for L’Oréal S.A.’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction 

is continued to February 29, 2008. Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall 

be due by February 1, 2008 and L’Oréal S.A.’s reply shall be due by February 15, 2008. 

Dated: _______________ 

_____________________________________________ 

THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

LEGAL_US_E # 76678048.3 

Case 3:07-cv-01669-MMC Document 42 Filed 10/12/07 Page 4 of 4