Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01835/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01835-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY GREEN, No. CIV S-04-1835-MCE-CMK

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

JAMES YATES, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel and in forma

pauperis, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March

3, 2005, the court granted petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel and set a status

conference in this case. On August 11, 2005, the court continued the date for the status

conference to October 11, 2005, and directed the parties to each submit a status conference

statements at least two weeks prior to the status conference. Following the parties’ failure to file

status report, the court vacated the October 11, 2005, status conference and ordered the parties to

show cause within 30 days why appropriate sanctions should not be imposed. 

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-01835-MCE -CMK Document 21 Filed 10/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The parties, through their respective counsel, have each filed responses to the

court’s order to show cause setting forth excusable neglect for their failure to file status reports. 

Good cause appearing therefor, the court’s October 6, 2005, order to show cause is discharged.

As part of respondents’ response to the court’s order to show cause, respondents

offer their assessment of the status of this case. Petitioner has not offered his assessment. 

According to respondents, the petition appears to be timely, the entire record is available, all

claims have been exhausted in state court, and no discovery or evidentiary hearing are

anticipated. Respondents will, therefore, be directed to file a response to the petition. If

respondents file an answer to the petition, the answer shall be accompanied by any and all

transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the petition. 

See Rule 5, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The October 6, 2005, order to show cause is discharged;

2. Respondents shall file a response to petitioner’s petition within 30 days

from the date of service of this order; and

3. Petitioner’s traverse, if an answer is filed, or opposition, if a motion is filed

in response to the petition, is due within 30 days after service of respondents’ answer or motion.

DATED: October 17, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01835-MCE -CMK Document 21 Filed 10/18/05 Page 2 of 2