Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02191/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02191-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDY D. NAB,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2191 GEB DAD PS

v.

CONTRACTOR’S STATE ORDER

LICENSE BOARD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed a discovery motion and noticed it for hearing

before the undersigned on April 25, 2008.

Pursuant to the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order filed in this action on July 6,

2007, all parties to this action were required to conduct their discovery so that discovery was

completed by February 29, 2008. As the order explains, 

[t]he word “completed” means that all discovery shall have been

conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes

relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order

if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has

been complied with.

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order at 3-4. Plaintiff did not bring his discovery dispute to the

court for resolution by appropriate order prior to February 29, 2008.

/////

Case 2:06-cv-02191-GEB-DAD Document 54 Filed 04/08/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s April 4, 2008 motion to compel

discovery has not been placed on the court’s calendar and is denied as untimely.

DATED: April 7, 2008.

DAD:kw

Ddad1/orders.prose/nab2191.mtc.den

Case 2:06-cv-02191-GEB-DAD Document 54 Filed 04/08/08 Page 2 of 2