Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01271/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01271-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT D. MULLINS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PREMIER NUTRITION CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-01271-RS 

ORDER CLARIFYING SCHEDULING 

ORDER

Plaintiff requests that the Court’s January 30, 2015 deadline for supplemental expert 

disclosures apply only to parties’ affirmative disclosures to be filed in support of their respective 

motions for summary judgment and for class certification, so that they may later file evidence to 

rebut motions not yet served. Plaintiff does not demonstrate that such relief is appropriate at this 

juncture. Legal arguments made in pleadings are generally countered with legal arguments—not

additional expert testimony. Having Dr. Grande and Mr. Poret’s reports in hand should at this 

time enable plaintiff to gather and provide all expert disclosures he thinks might be necessary to 

form the basis for legal arguments to rebut those defendant will put forth in its motion for 

summary judgment. Plaintiff’s request is, accordingly, denied; the January 30, 2015 deadline 

applies to all supplemental expert disclosures for summary judgment and class certification 

purposes. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2015 

______________________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-01271-RS Document 68 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 1