Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01358/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01358-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1145 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES P. DeFAZIO,

Plaintiff,

v. NO. CIV. S-04-1358 LKK/GGH

HOLLISTER, INC., Plan 

Administrator; et al.,

Defendants.

 /

On May 31, 2006, plaintiff’s counsel in the abovecaptioned case, Scottlynn J. Hubbard, was ordered to show cause why

sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file an opposition

or a statement of non-opposition in accordance with Local Rule 78-

230. The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s counsel’s response.

No good cause being shown, counsel for plaintiff is SANCTIONED

in the amount of one hundred and fifty ($150.00) dollars. This sum

shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court no later than thirty (30)

days from the effective date of this order. Counsel shall file an

affidavit accompanying the payment of this sanction which states

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 119 Filed 07/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

that it is paid personally by counsel, out of personal funds, and

is not and will not be billed, directly or indirectly, to the

client or in any way made the responsibility of the client as

attorneys' fees or costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 25, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 119 Filed 07/26/06 Page 2 of 2