Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_00-cv-06875/USCOURTS-caed-1_00-cv-06875-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS * 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRYAN E. RANSOM,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

J. WESTPHAL, et al.,

 

 Defendants.

NO. 1:00-cv-06875-RHW-WMW (PC)

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (#79)

BEFORE THE COURT are Magistrate Judge Wunderlich’s Findings and

Recommendations (Ct. Rec. 79) and Plaintiff’s Objections to Findings and

Recommendations (Ct. Rec. 82). Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this

civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On January 19, 2007, findings and

recommendations were entered, recommending dismissal of this action for failure to state

a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file

objections within thirty days. On March 1, 2007, after receiving an extension of time to

file, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully

reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and proper analysis. 

///

Case 1:00-cv-06875-RHW -WMW Document 83 Filed 01/08/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS * 2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January

19, 2007, (Ct. Rec. 79) are adopted in full.

2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Ct. Rec. 71) is GRANTED. This action is

dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies prior

to filing suit. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to enter

this order, to furnish a copy to Plaintiff and to counsel, and to close the file.

DATED this 4 day of January, 2008. th

S/ Robert H. Whaley

ROBERT H. WHALEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:00-cv-06875-RHW -WMW Document 83 Filed 01/08/08 Page 2 of 2