Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04967/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04967-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IRMA RAMIREZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HAPPY HEN DINER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-04967-JST 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: ECF Nos. 11, 12

On April 15, 2015, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause, in which it ordered Plaintiffs 

to: (1) serve Defendant Happy Hen Diner; and (2) seek entry of default against Defendant Cardosa 

Properties, Inc. ECF No. 11. The Court also set a May 27, 2015 hearing on the Order to Show 

Cause, which the Court would vacate if Plaintiffs took the foregoing actions. Id.

On April 27, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a response to the Court’s April 15 order. ECF No. 12. 

In the response, Plaintiffs explained that Defendant Happy Hen Diner is actually a d/b/a, and not a 

separate defendant (although it is listed as a defendant on the caption of the complaint). Id. at 1. 

Plaintiffs also explained that, although their first attempt at service on Defendant Cardosa 

Properties was ineffective, they had recently re-served that Defendant on April 12, 2015. Id. at 2. 

Cardosa Properties’ answer is now due May 4, 2015.

In light of the foregoing, the Court hereby continues the hearing on the order to show cause 

to June 4, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. If Defendant Cardosa Properties answers the complaint by May 4, 

2015, Plaintiffs shall file an administrative motion to vacate the order to show cause and the 

hearing on the order to show cause, and the parties shall proceed with the case according to the 

timeline set forth in Northern District General Order 56, available at 

http://cand.uscourts.gov/generalorders. See, e.g., ECF No. 4. If Defendant Cardosa Properties 

does not file a timely answer to the complaint, Plaintiffs shall file a motion for entry of default by 

Case 3:14-cv-04967-JST Document 14 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. That motion 

shall be due by May 19, 2015. In conjunction with the Motion for Entry of Default, Plaintiffs 

shall file an administrative motion to vacate the order to show cause and the June 4, 2015 hearing 

on the order to show cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-04967-JST Document 14 Filed 04/28/15 Page 2 of 2