Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00059/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00059-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE REVIS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

L. SALINAS, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:13cv00059 AWI DLB PC

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND 

PLAINTIFF A COPY OF SEPTEMBER 6, 

2013, ORDER

Plaintiff Andre Revis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 

action. Plaintiff filed his complaint in the Fresno County Superior Court on July 7, 2012. 

Defendants L. Salinas, J. Wang, A. Enenmoh, E. Clark and J. Moon were served with the 

complaint on December 13, 2012. On January 11, 2013, Defendants1removed the action to this 

Court. Defendants paid the filing fee upon removal.

On September 6, 2013, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and dismissed it with 

leave to amend. The Court provided Plaintiff with an explanation of the deficiencies and the 

standards necessary to state a claim.

On September 30, 2013, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. However, while 

Plaintiff appears to have attached additional exhibits, a majority of the form complaint is the 

 

1 Plaintiff names three other Defendants who have not appeared.

Case 1:13-cv-00059-AWI-DLB Document 11 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

same as his original complaint. The cover page of the form complaint indicates that it is an 

amended complaint, as does a hand-written cover page. However, the pages containing the 

factual allegations appear to be copies of Plaintiff’s original complaint. Indeed, the signature 

page has the original date of signing, July 5, 2012, with Plaintiff’s signature dated September 26, 

2013, added underneath. 

In other words, Plaintiff has submitted the same complaint and the deficiencies identified 

in the September 6, 2013, screening order remain uncorrected. As it is unclear if Plaintiff did 

this unintentionally, the Court will give Plaintiff a final opportunity to file an amended complaint 

pursuant to the September 6, 2013, order.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO 

AMEND. Plaintiff SHALL file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of 

service of this order. The amended complaint must comply with the September 6, 2013, 

screening order, a copy of which is attached to this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 14, 2014 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

3b142a

Case 1:13-cv-00059-AWI-DLB Document 11 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 2