Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01835/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01835-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

WO MD 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Ryan E. Walker, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Pinal County Jail Sheriff, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV 13-1835-PHX-GMS (BSB) 

ORDER 

Plaintiff Ryan E. Walker, who is confined in the Pinal County Jail in Florence, 

Arizona, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1) 

and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2). Plaintiff has also filed a 

Motion requesting an amended civil rights complaint form, writing materials, legal 

envelopes, and an order allowing access to a law library (Doc. 5). The Court will dismiss 

the Complaint with leave to amend. 

I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee

 Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 

The Court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The 

statutory fee will be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s 

income each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 

The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the appropriate government agency to 

collect and forward the fees according to the statutory formula. 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 1 of 25
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 

against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff 

has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon 

which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is 

immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). 

 A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the 

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 

does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, thedefendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 

(2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere 

conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id. 

 “[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a 

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual 

content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable 

for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible 

claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw 

on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s 

specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must 

assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id.

at 681. 

 But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, 

courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 

342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less 

stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. 

Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)). 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 2 of 25
- 3 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

 If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other 

facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal 

of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The 

Court should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of 

advice “would undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. 

Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to 

decide whether the court was required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court 

will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state a claim, but because the Complaint 

may possibly be saved by amendment, will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend. 

III. Complaint 

 In his three-count Complaint, Plaintiff alleges claims for denial of medical care, 

denial of access to the courts, and denial of basic necessities. Plaintiff appears to sue the 

following Defendants1

: Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu; Pinal County Adult Detention 

Facility (“PCADF”) and all PCADF Staff (although Plaintiff asserts this “do[es] not 

p[er]tain to all but is not limited to one”); Detention Officer K. Roderguz (sic); “Medical 

Staff/Provider” at PCADF; Detention Officer/Paralegal at PCADF; All Pinal County 

Correctional Health Services Healthcare Staff (although Plaintiff asserts this “do[es] not 

p[er]tain to all but is not limited to one”); and “Provider Health Care” “before the present 

provider of Health Care services but is not limited one (sic).” Plaintiff seeks the 

following relief: medical treatment and rehabilitation, and compensation for all present 

and future medical treatment, pain and suffering, stress, and treatment while grieving for 

his wife. 

 Although Plaintiff’s facts are disjointed, he appears to allege the following in 

Count I: Plaintiff was working in the kitchen of the PCADF when his feet slipped out 

from under him. He fell back against a table and then to the floor. He was not taken to 

medical for two hours and it was closed when he arrived. Plaintiff saw a nurse who gave 

 

1

 Plaintiff attached a second, handwritten page of Defendants but did not number each additional Defendant, and it is not clear whether Plaintiff has listed the same 

Defendant more than once using different appellations. 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 3 of 25
- 4 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

him 400 milligrams of ibuprofen. Plaintiff returned to work the following day. Three 

days later Plaintiff saw a medical office provider, who gave him ibuprofen for ten days. 

Plaintiff states that he had a three-inch by ten-inch bruise and after two months his skin 

was still discolored and he had a knot inside his skin. Plaintiff requested an x-ray “and 

picture” but his request was denied. He states that he likely had a cracked rib and 

“maybe a cracked coll[a]r bone too.” Plaintiff did not say when these events occurred but 

states that he has had problems from the fall “going on 6 month[s]” and is now having 

pinched nerve and shoulder problems. 

 Plaintiff also asserts that on August 25, 2013 he lost his wife and was taken to a 

hospital where he was given a half-hour to be with her and then “pull the plug.” When 

Plaintiff returned to the jail he asked to be put in lockdown so he could grieve. He 

apparently put this request in writing and thanked the medical staff and staff at the jail. 

Plaintiff alleges that “they took it wrong,” and stripped him naked and put him in a 

rubber room for four days. Plaintiff asserts, “At no time did I say I want or was 

think[ing] of hurting myself.” Plaintiff alleges that after four days a mental health doctor 

released him and said “sorry for being held.” 

 In Count II, Plaintiff alleges that a paralegal denied: “any and all assistance in 

preparing forms, including but not limited to this form”; “questions as to legal codes, 

procedures, proper information places, category”; “assistance in mailing forms and 

motions”; “a[c]quiring copies and notary serv[ic]es”; and “a[c]quiring names[,] tit[]les, 

address[e]s to courts.” 

 In Count III, Plaintiff asserts that the water boiler supplying the jail failed on May 

8, 2013 and was fixed on May 20, 2013. He alleges that he did not have hot water for 

bathing, clothing or bedding and that the lack of hot water was unsanitary for eating and 

living conditions. 

IV. Failure to State a Claim

 To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts supporting that (1) the 

conduct about which he complains was committed by a person acting under the color of 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 4 of 25
- 5 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

state law and (2) the conduct deprived him of a federal constitutional or statutory right. 

Wood v. Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1989). A plaintiff must also allege that 

he suffered a specific injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he 

must allege an affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. 

Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). 

 A. Sheriff Babeu 

 Plaintiff sues Pinal County Sheriff Babeu. While Babeu may be sued for 

constitutional violations, Plaintiff fails to state a claim against him. “A plaintiff must 

allege facts, not simply conclusions, that show that an individual was personally involved 

in the deprivation of his civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th 

Cir. 1998). For an individual to be liable in his official capacity, a plaintiff must allege 

that the official acted as a result of a policy, practice, or custom. See Cortez v. County of 

Los Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2001). Further, there is no respondeat

superior liability under § 1983, so a defendant’s position as the supervisor of someone 

who allegedly violated a plaintiff’s constitutional rights does not make him liable. 

Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 

1045 (9th Cir. 1989). A supervisor in his individual capacity “is only liable for 

constitutional violations of his subordinates if the supervisor participated in or directed 

the violations, or knew of the violations and failed to act to prevent them.” Taylor, 880 

F.2d at 1045. 

 Plaintiff fails to allege any facts against Babeu. Plaintiff has not alleged facts to 

support that Babeu enacted or enforced a policy, custom, or practice that resulted in the 

denial of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. Plaintiff also has not alleged facts to support 

that Babeu directly violated his constitutional rights or that Babeu was aware that 

Plaintiff’s rights were being violated but failed to act. For that reason, Plaintiff fails to 

state a claim against Babeu and he will be dismissed. 

. . . . 

. . . . 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 5 of 25
- 6 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

 B. Pinal County Adult Detention Facility 

 Plaintiff sues PCADF; however, PCADF is not a proper defendant. Claims under 

§ 1983 are directed at “bodies politic and corporate.” Monell, 436 U.S. at 688-89. Under 

the Civil Rights Act of 1871, Congress intended municipalities and other local 

government units to be included among those persons to whom § 1983 applies. Id. at 

689-690. In Arizona, the responsibility for operating jails and caring for prisoners is 

placed by law upon the sheriff and the County. See Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 11-251(8), 11-

291(A), 11-441(A)(5), 31-101. PCADF is simply an administrative creation of the 

sheriff to allow him to carry out his statutory duties; it is not a “person” amenable to suit 

pursuant to § 1983. See, e.g., Petaway v. City of New Haven Police Dep’t, 541 F.Supp.2d 

504 (D. Conn. 2008); Pahle v. Colebrookdale Twp., 227 F. Supp. 2d 361 (E.D. Pa. 2002). 

Accordingly, PCADF will be dismissed from this action. 

C. Unnamed or Fictitiously Identified Defendants 

 Plaintiff purports to sue unspecified and unenumerated staff of PCADF and its 

healthcare provider without alleging how any particular unidentified defendant allegedly 

violated his federal constitutional or statutory rights. The use of anonymous type 

appellations to identify defendants is generally disfavored. Rule 10(a) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure requires the plaintiff to include the names of the parties in the 

action. As a practical matter, it is impossible in most instances for the United States 

Marshal or his designee to serve a summons and complaint or amended complaint upon 

an anonymous defendant. 

 The Ninth Circuit has held that where identity is unknown prior to the filing of a 

complaint, the plaintiff should be given an opportunity through discovery to identify the 

unknown defendants, unless it is clear that discovery would not uncover the identities, or 

that the complaint would be dismissed on other grounds. Wakefield v. Thompson, 177 

F.3d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 

1980)). Further, where the names of individual defendants are unknown at the time a 

complaint is filed, a plaintiff may refer to the individual unknown defendants as 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 6 of 25
- 7 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

Defendant John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, and so on, and allege facts to support 

how each particular Doe defendant violated the plaintiff’s constitutional rights. The 

plaintiff may thereafter use the discovery processes to obtain the names of fictitiouslynamed defendants whom he believes violated his constitutional rights and seek leave to 

amend to name those defendants. Accordingly, in any amended complaint, Plaintiff 

should set forth how each fictitiously named Defendant allegedly violated his rights. 

Plaintiff should also identify different fictitious Defendants by different fictitious names, 

e.g., John Doe 1, John Doe 2, etc. 

 D. Detention Officer K. Roderguz 

 Plaintiff sues Detention Officer K. Roderguz; however, Plaintiff fails to allege 

how Roderguz violated his constitutional rights, including when, where, and how. At no 

point in the Complaint does Plaintiff allege any conduct by Roderguz. Accordingly, 

Plaintiff fails to state a claim against Roderguz and he or she will be dismissed. 

 E. Pinal County Correctional Health Services 

 While Arizona places responsibility for operating county jails by law upon the 

sheriff, see Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 11-141(A)(5), 31-101, Pinal County is responsible for the 

provision of medical care to inmates. Pinal County Correctional Health Services is an 

administrative creation of the County and is not a “person” amenable to suit under 

§ 1983. Accordingly, Pinal County Correctional Health Services will be dismissed. 

 F. Medical Staff/Provider 

 Plaintiff sues “Medical Staff/Provider”; however, it is not clear if “Medical 

Staff/Provider” denotes an unnamed individual, an unnamed group of defendants, or is 

another way of denoting Pinal County Correctional Health Services. Moreover, Plaintiff 

fails to allege how Medical Staff/Provider violated his constitutional rights, including 

when, where, and how. Accordingly, Plaintiff fails to state a claim against Medical 

Staff/Provider and that person(s) or entity will be dismissed. 

 G. Medical Care 

 Plaintiff designates Count I as a claim for the denial of constitutionally adequate 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 7 of 25
- 8 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

medical care. Not every claim by a prisoner relating to inadequate medical treatment 

states a violation of the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment. To state a § 1983 medical 

claim, a plaintiff must show that the defendants acted with “deliberate indifference to 

serious medical needs.” Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting 

Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)). A plaintiff must show (1) a “serious 

medical need” by demonstrating that failure to treat the condition could result in further 

significant injury or the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain and (2) the defendant’s 

response was deliberately indifferent. Id. at 1096 (quotations omitted). 

 “Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard.” Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 

1051, 1060 (9th Cir. 2004). To act with deliberate indifference, a prison official must 

both know of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate health; “the official must both be 

aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious 

harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 

837 (1994). Deliberate indifference in the medical context may be shown by a 

purposeful act or failure to respond to a prisoner’s pain or possible medical need and 

harm caused by the indifference. Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096. Deliberate indifference may 

also be shown when a prison official intentionally denies, delays, or interferes with 

medical treatment or by the way prison doctors respond to the prisoner’s medical needs. 

Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104-05; Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096. 

 Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary 

due care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835. “Neither negligence nor 

gross negligence will constitute deliberate indifference.” Clement v. California Dep’t of 

Corrs., 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1105 (N.D. Cal. 2002); see also Broughton v. Cutter Labs., 

622 F.2d 458, 460 (9th Cir. 1980) (mere claims of “indifference,” “negligence,” or 

“medical malpractice” do not support a claim under § 1983). “A difference of opinion 

does not amount to deliberate indifference to [a plaintiff’s] serious medical needs.” 

Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). A mere delay in medical care, 

without more, is insufficient to state a claim against prison officials for deliberate 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 8 of 25
- 9 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

indifference. See Shapley v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407 

(9th Cir. 1985). The indifference must be substantial. The action must rise to a level of 

“unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.” Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105, 439 F.3d at 1096 

(quotations omitted). 

 In addition to failing to identify any individuals responsible for the acts in Count I, 

Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support that any Defendant was deliberately indifferent to 

a serious medical need. Accordingly, Count I will be dismissed.

 H. Access to Courts 

 Plaintiff alleges in Count II that he has been denied access to the courts. The right 

of meaningful access to the courts prohibits officials from actively interfering with 

inmates’ attempts to prepare or file legal documents. Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 350 

(1996). The right of access to the courts is only a right to bring petitions or complaints to 

federal court and not a right to discover such claims or even to ligate them effectively 

once filed with a court. Id. at 354. The right “guarantees no particular methodology but 

rather the conferral of a capability—the capability of bringing contemplated challenges to 

sentences or conditions of confinement before the courts.” Id. at 356. Further, the denial 

of access to a paralegal or use of a law library is not actionable if there is no claim of 

prejudice to an existing or future legal action. Id. at 351-53. That is, as a matter of 

standing, for an access-to-courts claim, a plaintiff must show that he suffered an “actual 

injury” with respect to contemplated litigation. Id. at 349. To show actual injury with 

respect to contemplated litigation, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendants’ 

conduct frustrated or impeded him from bringing to court a non-frivolous claim that he 

wished to present. Id. at 352-53. A plaintiff “must identify a non-frivolous, arguable 

underlying claim,” and this underlying claim “must be described in the complaint.” 

Christopher v. Harbury, 536 U.S. 403, 414-15 (2002). 

 Plaintiff generally fails to allege specific facts regarding any alleged denial of 

access, including when and how he believes he was denied such access. Moreover, 

Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support that he has been actually injured with respect to 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 9 of 25
- 10 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

any pending or prospective litigation. Clearly, Plaintiff was able to file this action. Nor 

has he identified a non-frivolous, arguable underlying claim. For these reasons, Plaintiff 

fails to state a claim in Count II for denial of access to the court and it and Defendant 

Detention Officer/Paralegal will be dismissed. 

 I. Denial of Basic Necessities 

 Plaintiff alleges in Count III that he was denied basic necessities in the form of hot 

water to cleanse and sanitize his body, clothing and bedding, apparently from May 8 

through May 20, 2013. A claim for unconstitutional conditions of confinement arises 

under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Bell v. 

Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535 and n.16 (1979). To state a claim for unconstitutional 

conditions, a plaintiff must allege an objectively “sufficiently serious” deprivation that 

results in the denial of “the minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.” Farmer, 511 

U.S. at 834; see Allen v. Sakai, 48 F.3d 1082, 1087 (9th Cir. 1994); Estate of Ford v. 

Ramirez-Palmer, 301 F.3d 1043, 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2002). That is, a plaintiff must allege 

facts supporting that he is incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of harm. 

Farmer, 511 U.S. at 834. Further, only deprivations denying the minimal civilized 

measure of life’s necessities are sufficiently grave to violate the Eighth Amendment. 

Johnson v. Lewis, 217 F.3d 726, 731 (9th Cir. 2000). These are “deprivations of essential 

food, medical care, or sanitation” or “other conditions intolerable for prison 

confinement.” Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 348 (1981). Whether a condition of 

confinement rises to the level of a constitutional violation may depend, in part, on the 

duration of an inmate’s exposure to that condition. Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1089 

(9th Cir. 1996) (citing Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 686-87 (1978)). “The more basic 

the need, the shorter the time it can be withheld.” Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1287, 1259 

(9th Cir. 1982). 

 A plaintiff must also allege facts to support that a defendant had a “sufficiently 

culpable state of mind,” i.e., that the official acted with deliberate indifference to inmate 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 10 of 25
- 11 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

health or safety. See Farmer, 511 U.S. at 837. In defining “deliberate indifference” in 

the prison context, the Supreme Court has imposed a subjective test: “the official must 

both be aware of the facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk 

of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.” Id. A plaintiff must also 

allege how he was injured by the alleged unconstitutional conditions. See, e.g., Lewis, 

518 U.S. at 349 (doctrine of standing requires that claimant have suffered or will 

imminently suffer actual harm). 

 Plaintiff’s claim fails for several reasons. First, Plaintiff fails to allege facts to 

connect any named Defendant to the alleged violations or to support that any named 

Defendant acted with deliberate indifference to an excessive risk to Plaintiff’s health 

posed by those conditions. Plaintiff also fails to set forth facts to support that the alleged 

lack of hot water posed a substantial risk of harm to him. Finally, Plaintiff fails to allege 

how he was injured by the alleged violation or that he was imminent danger of injury. 

For these reasons, Plaintiff fails to state a claim for denial of basic necessities, and Count 

II will be dismissed. 

V. Motion 

In his Motion, Plaintiff requests (1) an amended civil rights complaint form, (2) 

writing materials, (3) legal envelopes, and (4) an order allowing access to a law library. 

Plaintiff states that he needs these items to conduct research and to prepare legal 

documents because county inmates do not get law library time, the paralegal will not 

provide independent research, and his requests for items 2, 3 and 4 have not been 

fulfilled. 

 Plaintiff’s Motion is granted in part and denied in part. The Court will grant 

Plaintiff’s Motion insofar as the Clerk of Court will provide a civil rights complaint form 

along with this Order. The Court will deny Plaintiff’s other requests. Plaintiff clearly 

has access to writing materials and was able to write and submit his Complaint in this 

action, and he does not allege that he has been unable to communicate with the Court. 

Also, as noted above, there is no actionable claim from denial of access to a law library if 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 11 of 25
- 12 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

there is no claim of prejudice to an existing or future legal action, that is, an actual injury. 

See Lewis, 518 U.S. at 351-53. Plaintiff has not made a claim of actual injury. 

VI. Leave to Amend 

 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to 

state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a 

first amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will 

mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If 

Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended 

complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 

 If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements 

telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name 

of the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to 

do; (4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of 

Plaintiff’s constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of 

that Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo, 423 U.S. at 371-72, 377. 

 Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If 

Plaintiff fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific 

injury suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for 

failure to state a claim. Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of 

Defendants has violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be 

dismissed. 

 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First 

Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 

Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. 

 A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 

963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 

F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 12 of 25
- 13 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised 

in the original complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. 

Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987). 

VII. Warnings

A. Release

 Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his 

release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he 

intends to pay the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to 

comply may result in dismissal of this action. 

B. Address Changes

 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with 

Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion 

for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in 

dismissal of this action. 

C. Copies

 Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further 

notice to Plaintiff. 

 D. Possible “Strike”

 Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff 

fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the 

dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil 

judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more 

prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal 

in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, 

malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner 

is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 13 of 25
- 14 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

E. Possible Dismissal

 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including 

these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 

F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any 

order of the Court). 

 IT IS ORDERED: 

 (1) Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted. 

 (2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government 

agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial 

filing fee. 

(3) Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 5) is granted in part and denied in part. The 

Motion is granted insofar as this Order requires the Clerk of Court to provide Plaintiff 

with a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. The Motion 

is denied in all other respects. 

(4) The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff 

has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in 

compliance with this Order. 

 (5) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of 

Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with 

prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

. . . . 

. . . . 

. . . . 

. . . . 

. . . . 

. . . . 

. . . . 

. . . . 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 14 of 25
- 15 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JDDL-K 

(6) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a 

civil rights complaint by a prisoner. 

Dated this 21st day of October, 2013. 

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 15 of 25
Revised 5/1/2013 1

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint 

in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated

persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These

complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should

not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction

or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a

person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file

a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment.

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by

incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or

neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions

must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may

attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper.

You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do

not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which

may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 

3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a

material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.

4. The Filing and Administrative Fees. The total fees for this action are $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee

plus $50.00 administrative fee). If you are unable to immediately pay the fees, you may request

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave

to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.

5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of

any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you

wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to

the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.

6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when

your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in

Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined

in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you

were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson

Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $400 filing and

administrative fees or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 16 of 25
2

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR Tucson Division:

U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. District Court Clerk

U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500

401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 405 West Congress Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any

change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing

address may result in the dismissal of your case.

8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit

to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each

original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must

include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the

document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may

be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed

this (month, day, year) to:

Name: 

Address: 

 Attorney for Defendant(s)

 

(Signature)

9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you

must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court-approved

civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of

Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After

any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a

proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate

by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants

not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are

subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take

additional processing time.

10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead,

the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or

oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.

11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of

any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading

or motion.

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 17 of 25
3

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.

HEADING:

1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address

on the lines provided.

2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name

more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the

words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all

of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1-A” at the bottom.

3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in

the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may

result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking

only injunctive relief.

Part A. JURISDICTION:

1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983

for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for

federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority. 

2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights

occurred. 

3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the

spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the

necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2-

B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.

Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:

You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you

were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided.

If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each

additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom of the

page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.

Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:

You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege

three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you

must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number

the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that

you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 18 of 25
4

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation

of only one civil right per count.

2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your

claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you

must identify the specific issue involved.

3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state

the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual

defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify

which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s)

occurred, if possible.

4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights. 

5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies

before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should

disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative

appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for

any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.

Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:

Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. 

SIGNATURE:

You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the

complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring

an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE

You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint

being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the

form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form

must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to

identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages.

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 19 of 25
Revised 5/1/2013 1 550/555

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

)

 , )

(Full Name of Plaintiff) Plaintiff, )

)

 vs. ) CASE NO. 

) (To be supplied by the Clerk)

(1) , )

(Full Name of Defendant) )

(2) , )

) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

(3) ,) BY A PRISONER

)

(4) , ) G Original Complaint

Defendant(s). ) G First Amended Complaint

G Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them. ) G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION

1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:

G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983

G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

G Other: .

2. Institution/city where violation occurred: .

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 20 of 25
2

B. DEFENDANTS

1. Name of first Defendant: . The first Defendant is employed as:

at .

(Position and Title) (Institution)

2. Name of second Defendant: . The second Defendant is employed as:

at .

(Position and Title) (Institution)

3. Name of third Defendant: . The third Defendant is employed as:

at .

(Position and Title) (Institution)

4. Name of fourth Defendant: . The fourth Defendant is employed as:

at .

(Position and Title) (Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS

1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? G Yes G No

2. If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed? . Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:

1. Parties: v. 

2. Court and case number: .

3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.

b. Second prior lawsuit:

1. Parties: v. 

2. Court and case number: .

3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.

c. Third prior lawsuit:

1. Parties: v. 

2. Court and case number: .

3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 21 of 25
3

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

COUNT I

1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: 

.

2. Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.

G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each

Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal

authority or arguments.

.

4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.

5. Administrative Remedies:

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your

institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you

did not. 

.

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 22 of 25
4

COUNT II

1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: 

.

2. Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.

G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each

Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal

authority or arguments.

.

4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.

5. Administrative Remedies.

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your

institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you

did not. 

.

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 23 of 25
5

COUNT III

1. State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: 

.

2. Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.

G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care 

G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation

G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: .

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each

Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal

authority or arguments.

.

4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.

5. Administrative Remedies.

a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your

institution? G Yes G No

b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No

c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No

d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you

did not. 

.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 24 of 25
6

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF

State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on 

DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or

other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES

All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach

no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you

attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages.

Case 2:13-cv-01835-GMS--BSB Document 6 Filed 10/21/13 Page 25 of 25