Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00403/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00403-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 150
Nature of Suit: Overpayments &amp; Enforcement of Judgments
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

FLINT GROUP INCORPORATED f/k/a

FLINT INK CORPORATION, Michigan

Corporation; and FLINT GROUP NORTH

AMERICA CORPORATION, a Michigan

Corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FRED HAINES & COMPANY, INC., a

California Corporation; and JOHN

VIDAMER d/b/a LABEESH TRUCKING,

an individual,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:07-CV-00403-LJO-DLB

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE THE STATUS/SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE SET FOR SEPTEMBER 20,

2007

WHEREAS, the parties and the Court met on July 31, 2007 for an Initial Scheduling

Conference in this matter, and the Court advised that the Scheduling Conference would be continued

based on the potential need to join non-parties by way of a cross-claim;

WHEREAS, the Court agreed to continue the Scheduling Conference until September 20,

2007, to allow time to obtain information relating to non-parties to determine if third party practice

was necessary;

WHEREAS, Defendant FRED HAINES & COMPANY issued subpoenas on August 7, 2007,

to NRC Environmental Services and The Stockton Record to obtain information contained in their

respective files relating to the ink spill at issue in this matter;

WHEREAS, the documents sought by way of the subpoena were due on August 28, 2007;

WHEREAS, NRC Environmental Services has requested a two week extension to produce

the documents responsive to the subpoena;

WHEREAS, FRED HAINES will not have sufficient time to review the documents

subpoenaed and make a determination whether third party practice will be necessary prior to the

Case 1:07-cv-00403-DLB Document 22 Filed 09/05/07 Page 1 of 3
Status/Scheduling Conference presently set for September 20, 2007; and

WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid spending the Court’s time unnecessarily;

The parties through their collective agreement, and the good cause set out above, seek a

continuance of the Status/Scheduling Conference for a minimum of 30 days. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: September 5, 2007 McCORMICK, BARSTOW,

SHEPPARD,WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

By: /s/ Jay A. Christofferson

Anthony N. DeMaria

Jay A. Christofferson

Attorneys for Defendant

FRED HAINES & COMPANY, INC.

Dated: September 5, 2007 BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY

By: /s/ Marilyn Raia

Marilyn Raia

Attorney for 

JOHN VIDAMER d/b/a LABEESH

TRUCKING

Dated: September 5, 2007 AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS,HAUER & FELD

LLP

By: /s/ David W. Nelson

David W. Nelson

Attorneys for

FLINT GROUP INCORPORATED and

FLINT GROUP NORTH AMERICAN

CORPORATION

Case 1:07-cv-00403-DLB Document 22 Filed 09/05/07 Page 2 of 3
ORDER

The Scheduling Conference is reset to October 25, 2007 at 8:15 a.m. in Department 4 (LJO),

or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 5, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00403-DLB Document 22 Filed 09/05/07 Page 3 of 3