Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_82-cv-00866/USCOURTS-ared-4_82-cv-00866-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION 

LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

et al. PLAINTIFFS

v. CASE NO. 4:82cv00866 BSM

PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL

SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. DEFENDANTS 

ORDER 

Mark Burnette, Stephen Jones, Debby Linton, Ken Kirspel, Bobby Acklin, Mika S.

Tucker, Doris Compton, Clay Fendley, Clayton Blackstock, Greg Alagood, Nicole Hartz,

Robert Pressman, Joy Springer, Margie Powell, John Walker, and Bobby Gosser are hereby

authorized to bring a cell phone, laptop computer, or personal digital assistant into the

Richard Sheppard Arnold Courthouse in Little Rock between Tuesday, February 16, 2010

and Friday, February 19, 2010, subject to the following rules:

(a) The devices mentioned above may not be used to record, photograph, or film

anyone or anything inside the courthouse.

(b) Cell phones must be turned off and put away when in the courtroom.

(c) Wireless internet components of electronic devices must be deactivated when

in district courtrooms.

(d) Before persons with electronic devices are granted entry into the courthouse,

all devices must be examined by the United States Marshals Service or Court

Security Personnel. This examination includes, but is not limited to placing

Case 4:82-cv-00866-DPM Document 4355 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 2
the device through the electronic screening machines and requiring the person

possessing the device to turn the power to the device off and on. 

(e) The United States Marshals Service may further restrict electronic devices

from entering the building should a threat assessment so dictate.

A violation of paragraph (a), (b), or (c) may result in seizure of the electronic devices,

withdrawal of the privilege to bring an electronic device into the courthouse, or other

sanctions. A violation of the prohibition on recording, photographing, or filming anyone or

anything inside the courthouse may be punished as contempt of court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of February, 2010.

 ________________________________

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 4:82-cv-00866-DPM Document 4355 Filed 02/16/10 Page 2 of 2