Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00945/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00945-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME

CASE NO. CV 10-00945 CW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

GEORGE C. BEST, BAR NO. 255555 

gbest@foley.com 

GINA A. BIBBY, BAR NO. 242657 

gbibby@foley.com 

975 PAGE MILL ROAD 

PALO ALTO, CA 94304-1013 

TELEPHONE: 650.856.3700 

FACSIMILE: 650.856.3710 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

KENNETH E. KROSIN, Pro hac vice

kkrosin@foley.com 

LARRY L. SHATZER, Pro hac vice

lshatzer@foley.com 

3000 K STREET N.W., SUITE 600 

WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5109 

TELEPHONE: 202.672.5300 

FACSIMILE: 202.672.5399 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Powertech Technology Inc. 

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

MORGAN CHU, BAR NO. 70446 

mchu@irell.com 

JONATHAN H. STEINBERG, BAR NO. 98044 

jsteinberg@irell.com

JOSEPH M. LIPNER, BAR NO, 155735 

jlipner@irell.com 

KENNETH J. WEATHERWAX, BAR NO. 218612 

kweatherwax@irell.com 

180 AVENUE OF THE STARS, SUITE 900 

LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4276 

TELEPHONE: 310.277.1010 

FACSIMILE: 310.203.7199 

Attorneys for Defendant, Tessera, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TESSERA, INC. 

Defendant. 

Case No: CV 10-00945 CW 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CHANGE TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL 

LOCAL RULE 6-2

[DECLARATION OF GINA A. BIBBY 

FILED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH] 

Date: May 6, 2010 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

Courtroom: Courtroom 2, 4th Floor

Case 4:10-cv-00945-CW Document 25 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 3
 

-1-

STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME

CASE NO. CV 10-00945 CW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Powertech Technology, Inc. 

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Tessera, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their counsel of record 

as follows: 

WHEREAS Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter 

Jurisdiction (“Motion”) on April 1, 2010, and Plaintiff was served on April 1, 2010; 

WHEREAS the hearing on Defendant’s Motion is noticed for May 6, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. 

WHEREAS the current deadline for Plaintiff to file its Opposition to Defendant’s Motion 

is April 15, 2010; 

WHEREAS the current deadline for Defendant to file its Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition 

is April 22, 2010; 

WHEREAS pursuant to stipulation filed March 26, 2010, the deadline for responding to 

the complaint was extended by one week to April 5, 2010, and there have been no other previous 

time modifications in the case, whether by stipulation or Court order; 

WHEREAS because Plaintiff’s counsel will be traveling out of this Country the week of 

April 12, 2010, the week Plaintiff’s Opposition is currently due, the Plaintiff and Defendant 

respectfully request the Court to extend the Plaintiff’s time to file its Opposition to the 

Defendant’s Motion to April 22, 2010; extend the Defendant’s time to file its Reply to the 

Plaintiff’s Opposition to April 29, 2010; and continue the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to 

May 13, 2010; 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the undersigned parties hereby 

stipulate and respectfully request the Court order as follows: 

1. The hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter 

Jurisdiction shall be continued from May 6, 2010 to May 13, 2010. 

2. Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be due on April 22, 2010. 

3. Defendant’s Reply shall be due on April 29, 2010. 

Case 4:10-cv-00945-CW Document 25 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 3
 

-2-

STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME

CASE NO. CV 10-00945 CW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 5, 2010 Foley & Lardner LLP 

By: /s/ Gina A. Bibby 

 Gina A. Bibby 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 Powertech Technology, Inc. 

Dated: April 5, 2010 Irell & Manella LLP 

By: /s/ Kenneth J. Weatherwax 

 Kenneth J. Weatherwax 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 Tessera, Inc. 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 7, 2010 

The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:10-cv-00945-CW Document 25 Filed 04/07/10 Page 3 of 3