Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02103/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02103-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENTE SOLOMON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-2103 WBS GGH P

vs.

J. NEGRETE, et al., ORDER and

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983. On June 21, 2011 (docket # 26), this court filed an order finding plaintiff’s first amended

complaint appropriate for service upon some of the named defendants as to specific claims. In a

concurrent filing (docket # 27), the court filed findings and recommendations, recommending

dismissal of a number of defendants and claims. In addition, the court recommended dismissal

of plaintiff’s second motion for preliminary injunctive relief, which had been filed on June 3,

2011. On the same day, June 21, 2011, plaintiff filed yet another putative motion for preliminary

injunction, seeking an “emergency transfer,” predicated again on his claim that his life is in

danger at CCI. Plaintiff has provided no declaration in support of this latest request and the court

will not again set forth the standards that must be met for preliminary injunctive relief of which

this most recent filing falls far short. Instead, the undersigned now recommends dismissal of this

Case 2:10-cv-02103-WBS-AC Document 30 Filed 06/24/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

request for the reasons incorporated in the findings and recommendations already pending and

filed on June 21, 2011 (docket # 27). 

Further, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff no longer engage in the seriatim filing of

inadequately supported and inapposite requests for preliminary injunctive relief, particularly

while such a request is still pending; should he continue to do so, this court will disregard such

filings. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s defective motion

for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on June 21, 2011 (docket # 28), be denied.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 24, 2011

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

solo2103.fr2

Case 2:10-cv-02103-WBS-AC Document 30 Filed 06/24/11 Page 2 of 2