Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-00790/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-00790-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

-1- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., 

SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC., and 

SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

JOHNSON & JOHNSON and CORDIS 

CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 02 0790 SI 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

CORRECTING SEPTEMBER 19, 

2006 RULING 

CORDIS CORPORATION, 

 Counterclaim-Plaintiff, 

 v. 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., 

SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC., 

and SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH, 

 Counterclaim-Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

The text on page 14 of the Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of 

Claim Construction and Declaring No Interference-in-Fact (September 19, 2006) is hereby 

corrected as shown below: 

Using the two-way test described above and applied in the previous order, the '594 

patent does claims of the Kastenhofer patents do not anticipate or render obvious any 

of the Kastenhofer product patents the claims of the '594 patent if it is assumed that 

the '594 patent is Kastenhofer patents are prior art to the Kastenhofer patents '594 

patent. See Medichem, S.A., 353 F.3d at 934. The Kastenhofer patents are claims of 

the '594 patent are not anticipated by the '594 patent claims of the Kastenhofer patents

because the Kastenhofer patents do not require the claim element "chemically 

bonded." In addition, the Kastenhofer patents are claims of the '594 patent are not 

rendered obvious by the '594 patent claims of the Kastenhofer patents because there is 

no evidence that a "hypothetical person having ordinary skill in the art" would regard 

Kastenhofer patents the claims of the '594 patent as obvious in light of the '594 patent

claims of the Kastenhofer patents. 

PROPOSED ORDER CORRECTING SEPTEMBER 19, 2006 RULING 

CASE NO. 02 C 0790 SI 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 465-1 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 466 Filed 12/05/06 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: December ___, 2006. 

 SUSAN ILLSTON 

 United States District Judge 

PROPOSED ORDER CORRECTING SEPTEMBER 19, 2006 RULING 

CASE NO. 02 C 0790 SI CH1 3676822v.1 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 465-1 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 466 Filed 12/05/06 Page 2 of 2