Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_05-cv-00917/USCOURTS-almd-2_05-cv-00917-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

TERRY HANSARD, #236060, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:05-CV-917-F

 ) [WO]

)

GWENDOLYN MOSLEY, et al., )

)

 Defendants. )

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On October 12, 2005, the plaintiff filed a document in which he requests that this

case be dismissed. See Court Doc. No. 4 at 2. The court therefore construes this

document to contain a motion to dismiss. Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss,

the court concludes that this motion is due to be granted. Furthermore, since the complaint

has not been served, the court concludes that this case is due to be dismissed without

prejudice. See Rule 41(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that:

1. The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss be granted.

2. This case be dismissed without prejudice.

3. No costs or fees be taxed in this case. 

It is further 

Case 2:05-cv-00917-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 3
2

ORDERED that on or before November 14, 2005 the parties may file objections to

this Recommendation. Any objections filed must specifically identify the findings in the

Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which the party is objecting. Frivolous, conclusive

or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The parties are advised

that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore, it is not

appealable.

Failure to file written objections to the p roposed findings and advisements in the

Magistrate Judge's Recommendation shall bar the party from a de novo determination by

the District Court of issues covered in the Recommendation and shall bar the party from

attacking on appeal factual findings in the Recommendation accepted or adopted by the

District Court except upon grounds of plain error or manifest injustice. Nettles v.

Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982). See Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d

33 (11th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981, en

banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit 

handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981.

DONE, this 25th day of October, 2005.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00917-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 10/25/05 Page 2 of 3
3

Case 2:05-cv-00917-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 10/25/05 Page 3 of 3