Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02539/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02539-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG STIP RE MOTION TO DISMISS PAGE LIMITS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MARK R. CONRAD (CA Bar No. 255667) 

CONRAD & METLITZKY LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Tel: (415) 343-7100 

Fax: (415) 343-7101 

Email: mconrad@conradmetlitzky.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Port of Mokha, Inc., 

Port of Mokha, LLC, Mokha Foundation, 

Mokhtar Alkhanshali, and Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

MOCHA MILL, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

PORT OF MOKHA, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

 CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS 

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 4:18-cv-02539-HSG Document 38 Filed 07/11/18 Page 1 of 3
- 1 - 

Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG STIP RE MOTION TO DISMISS PAGE LIMITS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 WHEREAS, on April 30, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in this action, see ECF No. 1; 

 WHEREAS, on June 4, 2018, Plaintiffs file an Amended Complaint in this action, ECF No. 24; 

 WHEREAS, the parties to this action have previously stipulated to, and the Court has ordered, an 

extended briefing schedule on forthcoming motions to dismiss to be filed by the defendants, with the 

motions to be heard on September 27, 2108, see ECF Nos. 22, 25 & 26, 29 & 31; 

 WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint asserts thirteen separate causes of action against each of 

Defendants Port of Mokha, Inc., Port of Mokha, LLC, Mokha Foundation, Mokhtar Alkhanshali, and 

Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim (“Stipulating Defendants”); 

 WHEREAS, in order to provide the Court with sufficient briefing and background to respond to 

the Amended Complaint on behalf of the Stipulating Defendants, undersigned counsel for the 

Stipulating Defendants requests leave to file a memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss that 

exceeds the default page limits set forth in Northern District Civil Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3; 

 WHEREAS, undersigned counsel for the Stipulating Defendants and for Plaintiffs have met and 

conferred and have agreed to the filing of overlength briefs as follows; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Stipulating Defendants and Plaintiffs hereby stipulate and agree that 

the page limits with respect to Stipulating Defendants’ forthcoming motion to dismiss shall be enlarged 

as follows: forty (40) pages for Stipulating Defendants’ opening brief, forty pages (40) for Plaintiffs’ 

opposition brief, and twenty (20) pages for Stipulating Defendants’ reply brief. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: July 10, 2018 CONRAD & METLITZKY LLP 

/s/ Mark R. Conrad 

MARK R. CONRAD 

Attorneys for Defendants Port of Mokha, Inc., 

Port of Mokha, LLC, Mokha Foundation, 

Mokhtar Alkhanshali, and Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim 

 

Case 4:18-cv-02539-HSG Document 38 Filed 07/11/18 Page 2 of 3
- 2 - 

Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG STIP RE MOTION TO DISMISS PAGE LIMITS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DATED: July 10, 2018 ALMADANI LAW 

/s/ Yasin M. Almadani 

YASIN M. ALMADANI 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION between Plaintiffs and Defendants Port of Mokha, Inc., Port of 

Mokha, LLC, Mokha Foundation, Mokhtar Alkhanshali, and Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim (“Stipulating 

Defendants”), the limits on Stipulating Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be forty (40) pages for the 

opening brief, forty (40) pages for the opposition brief, and twenty (20) pages for the reply brief. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _____________________ 

HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 

United States District Judge 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. 

7/11/2018

Case 4:18-cv-02539-HSG Document 38 Filed 07/11/18 Page 3 of 3