Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04374/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04374-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Lead Case No. 05-CV-04374 MMC 

SV #281003 v1 

KEITH L. SLENKOVICH, CA BAR NO. 129793

kslenkovich@thelen.com ROBERT E. CAMORS, JR., CA BAR NO. 121204 

bobcamors@thelen.com

RICHARD S. SWOPE, CA BAR NO. 233200 

rswope@thelen.com

SAMUEL J. MASELLI, CA BAR NO. 219503 

smaselli@thelen.com

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

225 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 1200 

San Jose, CA 95113-1723 

Tel. 408.292.5800 

Fax 408.287.8040 

PAUL J. ANDRE, CA BAR NO. 196585 

pandre@perkinscoie.com

LISA KOBIALKA, CA BAR NO. 191404 

lkobialka@perkinscoie.com

RADHIKA TANDON, CA BAR NO. 209126 

rtandon@perkinscoie.com

SHREYA RAMCHANDANI, CA BAR NO. 232041 

sramchandani@perkinscoie.com

JAMES HANNAH, CA BAR NO. 237978 

jhannah@perkinscoie.com

AMY SUN, CA BAR NO. 237185 

asun@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP 

101 Jefferson Drive 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Tel: 650.838.4300 

Fax: 650.838.4350 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CELERITY, INC., 

 Plaintiff/Counter-defendant 

 vs. 

ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 

AND SERVICE, INC.,

 Defendant/Counterclaimant 

 and 

ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC. 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. 05-CV-04374 MMC 

(CASE NO. 05-CV-03560 MMC 

consolidated with lead case 05-CV04374)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Case 3:05-cv-04374-MMC Document 119 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER -1- 

Lead Case No. 05-CV-04374 MMC 

SV #281003 v1

 Celerity, Inc. ("Celerity") has informed Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. and Ultra Clean 

Systems and Services, Inc. that it is withdrawing its assertion of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 

6,192,938 ("the '938 patent") and claim 32 of U.S. Patent No. 6,394,138 ("the '138 patent"). In 

light of Celerity's decision to withdraw these allegations of infringement, the parties have 

stipulated that the '938 patent and claim 32 of the '138 patent are no longer at issue in this case. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: January 26, 2007 THELEN, REID BROWN RAYSMAN 

 & STEINER, LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 KEITH L. SLENKOVICH 

 ROBERT E. CAMORS, JR. 

 RICHARD S. SWOPE 

 SAMUEL J. MASELLI 

 Attorneys for CELERITY, INC. 

Dated: January 26, 2007 PERKINS COIE LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 PAUL J. ANDRE 

 LISA KOBIALKA 

 RADHIKA TANDON 

 SHREYA RAMCHANDANI 

 JAMES HANNAH 

 AMY SUN 

 Attorneys for ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC. 

 and ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY 

 SYSTEMS AND SERVICES, INC. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Judge 

January 29, 2007

Case 3:05-cv-04374-MMC Document 119 Filed 01/29/07 Page 2 of 2