Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00651/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00651-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

MOT. ENLARGING TIME FOR FILING REPLY PLEADINGS: Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Paul Arons, State Bar #84970

LAW OFFICE OF PAUL ARONS

685 Spring Street, #104

Friday Harbor, WA 98250

Tel: (360) 378-6496

Fax: (360) 378-6498

lopa@rockisland.com

O. Randolph Bragg, IL. Bar #06221983

HORWITZ, HORWITZ & ASSOCIATES

25 East Washington, Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60602

(312) 372-8822

Peter Caron, Cal. State Bar #157364

2030 Divisadero Street, Suite 3

San Francisco, CA 94115

(415) 929-0637

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Miranda Defenbaugh

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIRANDA DEFENBAUGH, et al.

Plaintiff,

vs.

JBC & ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al.

Defendants.

Civ. No. 03-0651 JCS

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION ENLARGING

TIME TO ALLOW LATE FILING OF

REPLY PLEADINGS RE: MOTION TO

COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY

AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Date: September 22, 2006

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Courtroom A

Pursuant to N.D. Local Rule 6-3, plaintiff Miranda Defenbaugh moves for an order

enlarging time so that the reply memoranda and declaration she filed on Monday,

September 11, 2006, in connection with her Motion to Compel Further Discovery, and

Motion for Sanctions shall be deemed timely filed.

Case 3:03-cv-00651-JCS Document 119 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-00651-JCS Document 120 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
MOT. ENLARGING TIME FOR FILING REPLY PLEADINGS: Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to local rules, the reply pleadings were due on September 8, 2006. Due

to the press of other business, including traveling to, and taking, a two day deposition in

Orange County, California, between September 6, 2006 and September 9, 2006, ,t was

impossible for plaintiff’s counsel to complete and file these pleadings by the original due

date. These reply pleadings were filed, however, the next court day, September 11,

2006. There is no prejudice to any party, since no response to the reply pleadings is due

or allowed prior to the hearing of these motions. Plaintiff will be prejudiced if her reply

pleadings are not considered on account of their late filing. In connection with this

motion, plaintiff previously stipulated to continue the hearing of the motion at defendant’s

request, with defendants’ opposition pleadings to be served on August 31, 2006.

Granting this motion will not have any effect on any scheduled matters in this action.

Dated: September 11, 2006 LAW OFFICE OF PAUL ARONS

s/Paul Arons

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MIRANDA DEFENBAUGH

The court hereby grants plaintiff’s motion, and her reply pleading filed on

September 11, 2006 shall be deemed timely filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________ ________________

HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO Date

Case 3:03-cv-00651-JCS Document 119 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 2

Sept. 12, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:03-cv-00651-JCS Document 120 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2