Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01757/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01757-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 08cv1757

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARITO DELOS REYES QUINTOS,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 08-CV-1757 JM (POR)

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER

Doc. No. 15

vs.

DECISION ONE MORTGAGE COMPANY,

LLC; MORTGAGE MATTERS, INC.;

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOAN, INC.;

RECONTRUST, INC.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff filed a Verified Complaint on September 24, 2008 (Doc. No. 1), alleging violations

of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) (15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. and corresponding regulations), the Real

Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA; 26 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.), and state law claims for breach

of fiduciary duty and breach of covenant. Accompanying the complaint was a motion for a temporary

restraining order (“TRO”; Doc. No. 2), requesting the court enjoin a non-judicial foreclosure sale of

her property set for October 2, 2008. The motion was denied by court order on September 25, 2008.

(Doc. No. 4.) At 4:02 p.m. on October 1, 2008, Plaintiff filed a Request for Reconsideration (Doc.

No. 7), which was denied by the court on October 3, 2008. (Doc. No. 9.)

As the foreclosure sale has since been postponed to November 17, 2008, Plaintiff attempts

once again to forestall the proceeding. Before the court is Plaintiff’s ex parte application for a

temporary restraining order to prevent Defendants from proceeding with the foreclosure sale. (Doc.

Case 3:08-cv-01757-JM-JMA Document 16 Filed 11/17/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 08cv1757

No. 15.) The court notes no proof of service was submitted with the application.

Since the court has already ruled on the issue, and for the reasons set forth in its prior orders,

Plaintiff’s ex parte application for TRO (Doc. No. 15) is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 17, 2008

 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller

 United States District Judge

cc: All parties

Case 3:08-cv-01757-JM-JMA Document 16 Filed 11/17/08 Page 2 of 2