Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00691/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00691-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

e

Motion, Patrol Special Police v. City and County of San Francisco, 3:16 cv00691WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 0

THE LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL BAKONDI

Daniel A. Bakondi (SBN 242043)

870 Market Street, Suite 1157 San Francisco, CA 94102

Phone: 415.450.0424 Fax: 415.399.9608; 415.795.3733

danielbakondi@yahoo.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

San Francisco Patrol Special Police Officers Alan 

Byard, an individual; Officer Robert L. Burns, an 

individual; Officer Calvin C. Wiley, an individual; 

Officer John J. Andrews, an individual; Officer Scott 

Hart, an individual; Officer Todd Hart, an individual; 

Officer Samuel J. Reyes, Sr. an individual; Officer 

Theodore Torres, an individual; Officer John Barry, an 

individual; Officer Serge J. White, an individual; the 

San Francisco Patrol Special Police Officers Alliance, 

a public benefit corporation; the San Francisco Patrol 

Special Police Officers Association Inc., a public 

benefit corporation, and San Francisco Patrol Special 

Police, an unincorporated association; Officer Hanley 

Chan, an individual; Officer Earl L. Curtis, an 

individual; Officer Anthony Cirimele, an individual; 

Officer John Fitzinger, an individual;

Plaintiffs,

v.

The City and County of San Francisco, A Public 

Incorporation; The San Francisco Police Department, 

A Public Incorporation; Sergeant Gerald Darcy, an 

individual; Inspector Martin Ohalloran, an individual; 

Sergeant Ueugen Geleano, an individual; Sergeant 

John Bragagnolo, an individual; Sergeant Jesus Peña, 

an individual; Officer Michael Simmons, an 

individual; Sergeant Peter Thoshinsky, an individual;

Officer John Van Koll, an individual; Officer 

Thomas Cunnane, an individual; Officer Randy Ly, 

an individual; and DOES 1 through 10,000, inclusive; 

 Defendants,

 3:16-cv-00691

Formerly San Francisco Case No. CGC 13-

528788 

Originally filed as Contra Costa Case 

No. C12 - 01656

PLAINTIFFS’ STIPULATED 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 

UNDER RULE 7-11 TO CONTINUE 

TIME TO RESPOND TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGEMENT BY 2

DAYS

Trial Date: May 8, 2017

moved to May 22, 2017

 

Case 3:16-cv-00691-WHA Document 86 Filed 03/16/17 Page 1 of 4
e

Motion, Patrol Special Police v. City and County of San Francisco, 3:16 cv00691WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Relief Requested

Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to approve the parties’ stipulation extending

Plaintiffs’ time to file their opposition to Defendants’ pending summary judgment motion by two

days, from being due March 21, 2017 to being due March 23, 2017. Plaintiffs seek this relief due 

to the large number and complexity of issues, and because Plaintiffs’ counsel has the flu, with 

symptoms including fever and migraines. Plaintiffs assert that granting two extra days would 

allow them to prepare a more proper response. Defendants’ reply would be due March 30, 2017.

Respectfully submitted,

March 16, 2017 THE LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL BAKONDI

___/s/ Daniel A. Bakondi, Esq. ___________

Daniel A. Bakondi, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 3:16-cv-00691-WHA Document 86 Filed 03/16/17 Page 2 of 4
e

Motion, Patrol Special Police v. City and County of San Francisco, 3:16 cv00691WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

STIPULATION

The current deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment is March 21, 2017 at midnight. Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate 

that the new deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary 

Judgment is March 23, 2017 at midnight. Defendants’ reply will be due March 30, 2017.

THE LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL BAKONDI

___/s/ Daniel A. Bakondi, Esq. ___________

Daniel A. Bakondi, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs

DENNIS J. HERRERA

City Attorney

CHERYL ADAMS

Chief Trial Deputy

MARGARET W. BAUMGARTNER

Deputy City Attorney

By: /s/ Margaret W. Baumgartner____________

MARGARET W. BAUMGARTNER

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al. 

Case 3:16-cv-00691-WHA Document 86 Filed 03/16/17 Page 3 of 4
e

Motion, Patrol Special Police v. City and County of San Francisco, 3:16 cv00691WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to continue the deadline to file an 

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment from March 21, 2017 to March 23, 

2017. 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to continue the filing deadline

for an Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Court 

orders that deadline for Plaintiffs to file an Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary 

Judgment is March 23, 2017. Defendants’ Reply shall be due March 30, 3017. All other dates, 

including the hearing date for this motion and the pretrial conference date shall remain as set 

forth in the Court’s pretrial order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________ By:____________________________ HON. WILLIAM ALSUP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

March 16, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-00691-WHA Document 86 Filed 03/16/17 Page 4 of 4