Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01936/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01936-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Error! Unknown document property name. -1- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING TIME TO RESPOND TO UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 

 

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

PAUL V. LANKFORD, CA BAR NO. 181506 

plankford@thelenreid.com

LYNN R. FIORENTINO, CA BAR NO. 226691 

lfiorentino@thelenreid.com

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 371-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 371-1211 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DORMAN LONG TECHNOLOGY, LIMITED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT CLICK and MARIE CLICK, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

DORMAN LONG TECHNOLOGY, 

LIMITED et al., 

 Defendants. 

USDC Case No: C 06 1936 PJH 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO UNVERIFIED 

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, AND 

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES 

This stipulation is made by and between plaintiffs Robert Click and Marie Click 

(“plaintiffs”) and defendant Dorman Long Technology Limited (“DLT”), by and through their 

respective attorneys of record, The Arns Law Firm and Thelen Reid & Priest, LLP. 

RECITALS 

The stipulation is based on the following facts: 

 1. DLT was served with plaintiffs’ Unverified Complaint for Damages and Demand 

for Jury Trial (“the Complaint”) on or about April 27, 2006. 

 2. At the time DLT was served with the Complaint, DLT was already a party 

defendant to plaintiffs’ first complaint, Case No. 05-03037 PJH. 

Case 4:06-cv-01936-PJH Document 39 Filed 10/23/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Error! Unknown document property name. -2- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

 3. The Court granted DLT’s motion to dismiss on September 6, 2006, finding that the 

first complaint, Case No. 05-03037 PJH, was duplicative of the Complaint in the subject action. 

 4. The parties previously stipulated that DLT had until October 18, 2006 to answer 

the Complaint in the subject action. 

 5. The parties agree that DLT is granted a further extension up to and including 

November 17, 2006 to answer the Complaint in the subject action. 

 6. The parties reached a tentative settlement agreement at a mediation in this matter 

and are seeking the approval of the settlement by a workers’ compensation insurance carrier in 

order to finalize the settlement. The parties expect to obtain that approval within 30 days. 

 7. This case currently has a case management conference set for October 26, 2006 at 

2:30 p.m. 

 8. In light of the further extension DLT has to answer the Complaint, it is stipulated 

that the case management conference is continued to November 30, 2006 at 2:30 p.m. 

 9. The joint case management conference statement shall be due on November 22, 

2006. 

Dated: October 18, 2006 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

By /s/ Paul V. Lankford 

 Paul V. Lankford 

 Lynn R. Fiorentino 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DORMAN LONG TECHNOLOGY LIMITED 

Dated: October ___, 2006 

 THE ARNS LAW FIRM 

By_/s/Morgan C. Smith_______________

 Morgan C. Smith 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 ROBERT CLICK and MARIE CLICK 

Case 4:06-cv-01936-PJH Document 39 Filed 10/23/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Error! Unknown document property name. -3- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________________ 

 ________________________________ 

 The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton 

 United States District Judge 

10/23/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-01936-PJH Document 39 Filed 10/23/06 Page 3 of 3