Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01492/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01492-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UBALDO MIO GUTIERREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

P. REYERSBACH, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP 

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 28, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time to file objections 

has passed, and Plaintiff did not file any objections. 

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 

magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 

Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 

Case 2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP Document 21 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 28, 2023 (ECF No. 16) are

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Service shall be initiated on J. Pantoja; 

3. All other claims and defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice; and

4. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 

proceedings.

Date: November 1, 2023

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge

Case 2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP Document 21 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 2