Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01338/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01338-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

A civil action is opened when a motion is filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and all

subsequent filings are docketed in the civil case. The § 2255 motion is also filed in the

underlying criminal case.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff/Respondent, 

vs.

Jesus Felix Payan,

Defendant/Movant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 09-1338-PHX-EHC (JRI)

No. CR 08-0193-PHX-EHC

ORDER

On June 22, 2009, Movant filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.1

 The United States has filed a Response. The matter was referred

to Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin who filed a Report and Recommendation on February 5,

2010 recommending that the Motion be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute

(Dkt. 10 - CIV 09-1338). 

 The district court reviews de novo the portions of the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation to which there is a filed objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)("a judge of

the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report, ..., to which

objection is made."); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.

Case 2:09-cv-01338-EHC Document 12 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

2003). The district court is not required to review any issue that is not the subject of an

objection. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Ariz. 2003), citing Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

Movant has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. The docket

sheet shows that the Report and Recommendation was mailed to Movant at his address of

record on February 5, 2010 and that the mail was returned as undeliverable on February 22,

2010 (Dkt. 11). The Report and Recommendation will be adopted as the Order of the Court.

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt.

10 - CIV 09-1338-PHX-EHC (JRI)) is adopted in full, including the denial of a Certificate

of Appealability. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct

Sentence is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

DATED this 12th day of March, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-01338-EHC Document 12 Filed 03/15/10 Page 2 of 2