Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00447/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00447-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM P. GARCIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEN CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:10-CV-00447-OWW-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(DOC. 20)

Plaintiff William P. Garcia (“Plaintiff”) is a California

state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 24, 2010, Plaintiff filed his

first amended complaint. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and

Local Rule 302.

On September 20, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on Plaintiff and which

contained notice to Plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff

did not file an Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having

1

Case 1:10-cv-00447-LJO-GSA Document 18 Filed 11/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 20,

2010, is adopted in full; 

2. This action proceed against Defendants Palmer, Tolson,

Turner, C. Walter, Santos, D. Ibarra, S. Knight, Sanez,

F. Diaz, and K. Allison for violation of the First

Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth

Amendment, and the Religious Land Use and

Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000; and

3. Defendants Quintana, Sheron, Lais, and Ken Clark are

dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 4, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00447-LJO-GSA Document 18 Filed 11/04/10 Page 2 of 2