Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-02307/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-02307-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Kari Pardo, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner 

of Social Security, 

Defendant.

No. CV-14-02307-TUC-CKJ

ORDER 

 On August 27, 2014, Plaintiff filed a civil complaint regarding the final decision 

by the Commissioner of Social Security to deny her benefits. (Doc. 1.) The matter was 

referred to Magistrate Judge D. Thomas Ferraro for all pretrial proceedings. (Doc. 18.) 

On February 2, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (R & 

R) that the District Court, after its independent review, vacate the Commissioner’s 

decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for benefits and remand for further proceedings. (Doc. 

22 at 8.) The R & R advised that any party could serve and file written objections within 

14 days of service of a copy of the R & R. (Doc. 22 at 9.) No objections have been filed.

 The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for 

clear error the unobjected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. Johnson v. 

Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also, Conley v. Crabtree, 14 

F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 

Case 4:14-cv-02307-CKJ-DTF Document 23 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 The Court has reviewed the Complaint, the Answer, the opening brief, the 

response brief, and the reply brief as well as the R & R. The Court finds no clear error 

and remands the case for further proceedings in conformity with this Order and the R & 

R. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

 (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is adopted. 

 (2) Plaintiff’s case is remanded to the Social Security Administration for 

further proceedings in conformity with this Order and the R & R. 

 Dated this 19th day of February, 2016. 

Case 4:14-cv-02307-CKJ-DTF Document 23 Filed 02/22/16 Page 2 of 2