Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_19-cv-01547/USCOURTS-casd-3_19-cv-01547-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441lm Removal- Labor/Mgmt. Relations

---

1

19cv1547-JAH(MSB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESUS JIMENEZ, in a representative 

capacity only, on behalf of all aggrieved 

employees,

Plaintiff,

v.

CRC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT WEST INC, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 19cv1547-JAH(MSB)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE 

MOTION [ECF NO. 33]

On January 24, 2020, the Court held a discovery hearing on Plaintiff’s “Ex Parte

Application to (1) Stay Discovery Pending a Ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand; or 

(2) Quash Defendant’s Subpoena; (3) Request for Sanctions Against Defendant.” (ECF 

No. 33.) For the reasons stated on the record, the Court issues the following orders:

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:19-cv-01547-JAH-MSB Document 43 Filed 01/27/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

19cv1547-JAH(MSB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1) The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s ex parte motion to quash Defendant’s 

November 7, 2019 subpoena directed to third party Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon 

Wireless (“Verizon”). The Court MODIFIES the subpoena by limiting the time frame of 

the information sought in the subpoena to August 2017, through August 7, 2019. 

Verizon must produce all documents and information responsive to the subpoena by 

February 12, 2020. Defendant is ORDERED to serve the copy of this order on Verizon by 

January 29, 2020.

2) The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s ex parte motion to sanction Defendant and its 

counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2020

Case 3:19-cv-01547-JAH-MSB Document 43 Filed 01/27/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2