Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01320/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01320-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MORRIS DAY aka RICKEY LOUIS 

ALFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

SUPREME COURT STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:19-cv-1320 JAM DB PS

ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On November 6, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings 

and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed any 

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

////

Case 2:19-cv-01320-JAM-DB Document 5 Filed 01/24/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 6, 2019 (ECF No. 4) are adopted 

in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s July 15, 2019 application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is

denied;

3. Plaintiff’s July 15, 2019 complaint (ECF No. 1) is dismissed without leave to amend; 

and

4. This action is dismissed.

DATED: January 23, 2020

/s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 2:19-cv-01320-JAM-DB Document 5 Filed 01/24/20 Page 2 of 2