Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02301/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02301-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY UNTIL THE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 2, 2007 – No. C 05-2301 CRB (JL) 

LA1 876626v.1

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

Daniel E. Alberti (State Bar No. 68620) (dalberti@mwe.com) 

Stephen J. Akerley (State Bar No. 160757) (sakerley@mwe.com) 

John A. Lee (State Bar No. 229911) (jlee@mwe.com) 

3150 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: 650.813.5000 

Facsimile: 650.813.5100 

Joseph H. Paquin, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice)(jpaquin@mwe.com) 

227 West Monroe Street, Suite 4400 

Chicago, IL 60606-5096 

Telephone: 312.372.2000 

Facsimile: 312.984.7700 

Attorneys for Plaintiff HITACHI, LTD. 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

Edward G. Poplawski (SBN 113590) (epoplawski@sidley.com) 

Samuel N. Tiu (SBN216291) (stiu@sidley.com) 

555 W. Fifth St., Suite 4000 

Los Angeles, CA 90013 

Telephone (213) 896-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 

Peter H. Kang (SBN 158101) (pkang@sidley.com) 

Teague I. Donahey (SBN 197531) (tdonahey@sidley.com) 

555 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Attorneys for Defendant AMTRAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

HITACHI, LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AMTRAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. C 05-2301 CRB (JL) 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

STIPULATED ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY 

UNTIL THE CASE MANGEMENT 

CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 

FEBRUARY 2, 2007 

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 87 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY UNTIL THE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 2, 2007 – No. C 05-2301 CRB (JL) 

LA1 876626v.1

 Whereas, the Court, on October 30, 2006 and December 18, 2006, ordered a stay of this case 

until January 15, 2007 to permit the parties to negotiate a Final Agreement resolving their dispute; 

 Whereas, the Court, on December 19, 2006, set a Further Case Management Conference to 

be held on February 2, 2007, at 8:30 a.m.; 

 Wherease, the parties continue to work diligently to negotiate the specific terms and 

conditions of the contemplated Final Agreement; nevertheless because of the holidays and the fact 

that the clients for both sides are located in Asia and in a different time zone, the parties need 

additional time in which to finalize their negotiations and arrive at the contemplated Final 

Agreement; 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, subject to the Court's approval, this action 

shall continue to be stayed until February 2, 2007, at which time the parties shall appear before the 

Court for the Further Case Management Conference to report on the progress of settlement. 

 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

By: /s Peter H. Kang1

Dated: January 12,_2007 

Edward G. Poplawski 

Peter H. Kang 

Teague I. Donahey 

Samuel N. Tiu 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AMTRAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

By: /s John A. Lee 

Dated: January 12,_2007 

Daniel E. Alberti 

Stephen J. Akerley 

Joseph H. Paquin, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) 

John A. Lee 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

HITACHI, LTD. 

 

1

 Pursuant to General Order 45X, I hereby certify that concurrence in the e-filing of this document was obtained from 

John Lee. 

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 87 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY UNTIL THE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 2, 2007 – No. C 05-2301 CRB (JL) – 

LA1 876626v.1

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________________ _____________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Filer’s Attestation: Peter H. Kang hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has 

been obtained. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

January 17, 2007

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 87 Filed 01/19/07 Page 3 of 3