Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01314/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01314-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT STRINGFELLOW,

Plaintiff,

v.

WARDEN PRICE, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-1314 KJN P

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed July 21, 2015, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the 

court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants, or to 

submit an amended complaint. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not 

responded to the court’s order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 

Case 2:15-cv-01314-KJN Document 10 Filed 09/01/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991).

Dated: August 31, 2015

/stri1314.fusm

Case 2:15-cv-01314-KJN Document 10 Filed 09/01/15 Page 2 of 2