Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00586/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00586-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 28:794 Rehabilitation Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYLVIA AHN,

Plaintiff,

v.

GEO GROUP INC., et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 1:22-cv-00586-CDB

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ SECOND 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY 

PENDING MEDIATION

(Doc. 92) 

Background

On October 22, 2024, Plaintiff Sylvia Ahn (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant GEO Group, Inc.

(“Defendant”; collectively, the “parties”), stipulated to extend the time to November 20, 2024 

for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s “Rule 34 Demands for Inspection and Production of 

Documents, Electronically Stored Information and Tangible Things,” which includes 

Defendant’s first set of interrogatories and requests for document production, which were served 

on September 23, 2024. (Doc. 90).

Pending before the Court is the second stipulated request to extend time for Plaintiff to 

respond to Defendant’s first set of interrogatories and requests for document production. (Doc. 

92). The parties agree that a further extension of the November 20, 2024 discovery deadline to 

March 31, 2025, will facilitate their current efforts for a mutual resolution of this case via 

mediation. (Doc. 92). The parties further agree not to serve or respond to any further discovery 

requests until after mediation is complete, unless mediation efforts fail or unless those discovery 

requests are agreed to or ordered by the undersigned and related to the mediation proceedings. 

Case 1:22-cv-00586-CDB Document 95 Filed 11/22/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Id.

This case has not been scheduled and case management dates governing discovery 

deadlines have not been set by the Court because a defense motion to dismiss remains pending. 

See (Doc. 76).

Conclusion and Order

Accordingly, with good cause appearing, the parties’ second stipulated request to extend 

time to respond to discovery (Doc. 92) is GRANTED. 

It is HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s first 

set of interrogatories and requests for document production is extended to March 31, 2025. It 

is FURTHER ORDERED that no party shall serve or respond to any further discovery requests 

until after mediation is complete, unless parties so stipulate or by leave of Court after a showing 

of good cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 22, 2024 ___________________ _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-00586-CDB Document 95 Filed 11/22/24 Page 2 of 2