Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03175/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03175-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT PETRO MOTA ONLY

- 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CARY KLETTER

SALLY TRUNG NGUYEN 

KLETTER + NGUYEN LAW LLP

1900 S. Norfolk Street, Suite 350

San Mateo, CA 94403

T: 415.434.3400

E: ckletter@kletterlaw.com

E: snguyen@kletterlaw.com

Attorneys for PLAINTIFF

MIRIAM ANDRADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIRIAM ANDRADE, 

PLAINTIFF,

v.

ARBY’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; 

ALTAMIRA CORPORATION; PETRO 

MOTA; and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, 

inclusive, 

DEFENDANTS.

Civ. Case No. 15-CV-03175-NC

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT PETRO MOTA

ONLY

Case 5:15-cv-03175-NC Document 86 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 2
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT PETRO MOTA ONLY

- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Miriam Andrade (“Plaintiff”) respectfully request this Court dismiss Defendant 

PETRO MOTA (“MOTA”) only, with prejudice, from this action pursuant to the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) Rule 41(a)(2). Plaintiff has resolved her claims against MOTA. 

Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into between Plaintiff and MOTA, 

each of them is to bear his/her own costs attorney’s fees and costs.

Dated: July 18, 2016 KLETTER + NGUYEN LAW LLP

 

By: _____/S/ _____

Cary Kletter 

Sally Trung Nguyen

Attorneys for PLAINTIFF

MIRIAM ANDRADE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based upon Plaintiff’s request for dismissal of Defendant MOTA only, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 

1. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), Defendant MOTA is DISMISSED with prejudice from this 

action; 

2. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into between the Plaintiff and 

MOTA, each of them is to bear his/her own costs attorney’s fees and costs; ands

3. The Court retains jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the term of the Settlement 

Agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________ 

HONORABLE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 5:15-cv-03175-NC Document 86 Filed 07/19/16 Page 2 of 2