Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01105/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01105-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE BIRKS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1105 LKK EFB P

vs.

C.A. TERHUNE, et al.,

ORDER AND FINDINGS

Defendants. & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On July 31, 2006, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the amended

complaint on defendants. 

On February 15, 2007, process directed to defendant N. Barron was returned unserved

with the notation “no ‘N. Barron’ in CDC locator.” Plaintiff must provide additional information

to serve these defendants. Plaintiff shall promptly seek such information through discovery, the

California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov’t. Code §§ 6250, et seq., or other means available to

plaintiff. If access to the required information is denied or unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may

seek judicial intervention.

On November 15, 2006, process directed to defendant Manis was returned unserved with

the notation “need more identifiers.” By an order filed December 12, 2006, the court directed

plaintiff to provide additional information to serve defendant Manis within sixty days. That

Case 2:05-cv-01105-LKK -EFB Document 68 Filed 03/13/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

period has passed and plaintiff has not returned the USM-285 form necessary to effect service on

defendant Manis or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff one USM-285 forms, along

with an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed April 24, 2006;

2. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and submit the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following documents:

a. One completed USM-285 form for defendant Barron; and

b. Two copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed April 24, 2006 or show

good cause why he cannot provide such information.

Further, IT IS RECOMMENDED that defendant Manis be dismissed without prejudice. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 12, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-01105-LKK -EFB Document 68 Filed 03/13/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff, No. CIV 

vs.

 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 completed summons form

 completed USM-285 forms

 copies of the 

 Complaint/Amended Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:05-cv-01105-LKK -EFB Document 68 Filed 03/13/07 Page 3 of 3