Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

DOCUMENTS RE MAGMA’S MSJ REPLY MEMO 

C-04-03923 MMC

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) – griley@omm.com

MARK E. MILLER (S.B. #130200) – markmiller@omm.com

PETER OBSTLER (S.B. #171623) – pobstler@omm.com

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO (S.B. #208606) – ccatalano@omm.com

LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) – lsimmons@omm.com 

NORA M. PUCKETT (pro hac vice) – npuckett@omm.com

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation,

Plaintiff, 

v.

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, 

INC., a Delaware Corporation, AND 

LUKAS VAN GINNEKEN, 

Defendants.

Case No. C04-03923 MMC 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5 

CERTAIN DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN 

SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT MAGMA 

DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.’S REPLY 

MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER 

SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE 

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION IN 

SYNOPSYS, INC.’S THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Magma Design Automation, Inc. (“Magma”) hereby moves pursuant to Civil Local Rule 

79-5 for leave to file under seal (1) Magma’s Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Its 

Motion for Summary Judgment as to the First Cause of Action in Synopsys, Inc.’s Third 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 728 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 - 2 - 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

DOCUMENTS RE MAGMA’S MSJ REPLY MEMO 

C-04-03923 MMC

Amended Complaint, (2) portions of the Declaration of Dr. Majid Sarrafzadeh in Support of 

Magma’s Reply Memorandum (“Sarrafzadeh Declaration”); (3) Exhibit B to the Sarrafzadeh 

Declaration; (4) portions of the Declaration of Lukas van Ginneken (“van Ginneken 

Declaration”); and (5) Exhibit A to the van Ginneken Declaration. This motion is supported by 

the Declaration of Nora M. Puckett submitted herewith. 

Magma’s Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment as 

to the First Cause of Action in Synopsys, Inc.’s Third Amended Complaint relies in part on 

testimony and documents that contain confidential business, trade secret or personal identifying 

information or have been designated as confidential under a Stipulated Protective Order. 

Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, and a Stipulated Protective Order with third party 

International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), Magma seeks to file the following 

documents and testimony under seal: 

1. Portions of Magma’s Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Its Motion for 

Summary Judgment as to the First Cause of Action in Synopsys, Inc.’s Third Amended 

Complaint contain Magma’s, Synopsys’s and/or IBM’s confidential business, trade secret or 

personal identifying information and are properly sealable. 

2. Portions of the Sarrafzadeh Declaration, and Exhibit B thereto, contain 

confidential business or trade secret information of Synopsys and/or IBM and are properly 

sealable. 

3. Portions of the van Ginneken Declaration, and Exhibit A thereto, contain 

confidential business or trade secret information of Synopsys and/or IBM and are properly 

sealable. 

 Accordingly, this motion is made on the grounds that portions of Magma’s Reply 

Memorandum in Further Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment as to the First Cause of 

Action in Synopsys, Inc.’s Third Amended Complaint, portions of the Sarrafzadeh Declaration, 

Exhibit B to the Sarrafzadeh Declaration, portions of the van Ginneken Declaration, and Exhibit 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 728 Filed 11/28/05 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 - 3 - 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

DOCUMENTS RE MAGMA’S MSJ REPLY MEMO 

C-04-03923 MMC

A to the van Ginneken Declaration, contain confidential business, trade secret or personal 

identifying information or have been designated confidential and are properly sealable. 

Dated: November 14, 2005 GEORGE A. RILEY 

MARK E. MILLER 

PETER OBSTLER 

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO 

LUANN L. SIMMONS 

NORA M. PUCKETT 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Nora M. Puckett 

Nora M. Puckett 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 728 Filed 11/28/05 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 - 4 - 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

DOCUMENTS RE MAGMA’S MSJ REPLY MEMO 

C-04-03923 MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Having considered Magma Design Automation, Inc.’s Administrative Motion for Leave to 

File Under Seal Certain Documents Submitted in Further Support of Its Motion for Summary 

Judgment as to the First Cause of Action in Synopsys, Inc.’s Third Amended Complaint, and all 

other supporting and opposing arguments and papers, and finding good cause, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, Magma’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File 

Under Seal: 

(a) the portions of Magma’s Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Its Motion for 

Summary Judgment as to the First Cause of Action in Synopsys, Inc.’s Third Amended 

Complaint containing Magma’s, Synopsys’s and/or IBM’s confidential business, trade 

secret or personal identifying information; 

(b) the portions of the Declaration of Dr. Majid Sarrafzadeh in Support of Magma’s 

Oppositions to Synopsys’s Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (“Sarrafzadeh 

Declaration”) containing Synopsys’s, and/or IBM’s confidential business or trade secret 

information; 

(c) Exhibit B to the Sarrafzadeh Declaration containing Synopsys’s, and/or IBM’s 

confidential business or trade secret information; 

(d) the portions of the Declaration of Lukas van Ginneken (“van Ginneken Declaration”) 

containing Synopsys’s, and/or IBM’s confidential business or trade secret information; 

and

(e) Exhibit A to the van Ginneken Declaration containing Synopsys’s, and/or IBM’s 

confidential business or trade secret information, 

is GRANTED, and the aforementioned exhibits, portions of Magma’s Reply 

Memorandum in Further Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment as to the First 

Cause of Action in Synopsys, Inc.’s Third Amended Complaint, portions of the 

/ / 

/ / 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 728 Filed 11/28/05 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 - 5 - 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

DOCUMENTS RE MAGMA’S MSJ REPLY MEMO 

C-04-03923 MMC

Sarrafzadeh Declaration, and portions of the van Ginneken Declaration will be filed 

under seal.

Dated: 

 ________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SF1:608221.1

November 28, 2005

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 728 Filed 11/28/05 Page 5 of 5