Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02159/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02159-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAHRIAR JABBARI,

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-02159-VC 

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE 

COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 14

The June 12, 2015 stipulation submitted by the parties is rejected. Although there's 

nothing wrong with the proposed 30-day extension of the deadline to respond to the complaint, the 

parties have provided no reason for more than four months to pass between the date the defendants 

file any motion in response to the complaint and the date the motion is heard. Absent some 

compelling reason for such a delay, the parties should submit a new briefing schedule which 

culminates in a hearing on the defendants' responsive motion no later than September 10, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 15, 2015

______________________________________

 VINCE CHHABRIA

 United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-02159-VC Document 15 Filed 06/15/15 Page 1 of 1