Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-89-07087/USCOURTS-ca10-89-07087-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 

---

FILED 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALsJnited States Court of Appeals 

T""rith Cfr,-,~it 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

BETTY BROWN; ROGER BROWN, ) 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

) 

) 

) 

v. 

UNIROYAL GOODRICH CANADA, INC.; 

CHEMICAL LTD./UNIROYAL LTEE, a 

subsidiary of Uniroyal, Inc., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

) 

) 

UNIROYAL) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

• 

JAN 2 8 1991 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 89-7087 

(D.C. No. 88-020-C) 

( E . D • Okla . ) 

Before MOORE, BARRETT, Circuit Judges, and SPARR,** District 

Judge. 

**Honorable Daniel 

District Court for 

designation. 

B. Sparr, District Judge, 

the District of Colorado, 

United States 

sitting by 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

* 

The case is therefore ordered 

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppal. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 89-7087 Document: 010110080446 Date Filed: 01/28/1991 Page: 1 
• 

Plaintiffs have appealed challengi~~ the district court's 

denial of their motion to amend their complaint to add a new 

defendant and the district court's entry of summary judgment in 

favor of the named defendants. We have reviewed the record on 

appeal and the parties' appellate briefs, and we concur in the 

district court's determinations. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED for substantially 

the reasons set forth in the district court's orders entered on 

May 2, 1989, and August 14, 1989. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 89-7087 Document: 010110080446 Date Filed: 01/28/1991 Page: 2