Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01072/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01072-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELEAZAR RAMIREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVE DAVEY,

Defendants.

No. 1:15-cv-01072 LJO JLT HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. No. 20)

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART (Doc. No. 

18)

ORDER DISMISSING GROUNDS ONE 

THROUGH FIVE, SEVEN, AND EIGHT

ORDER REFERRING CASE BACK TO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FURTHER 

PROCEEDINGS

Petitioner Eleazar Ramirez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in propria persona 

with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 26, 2016, the 

Magistrate Judge assigned to the case issued Findings and Recommendations to grant in part 

Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition as unexhausted. (Doc. No. 18.) The Findings and 

Recommendations were served upon all parties and contained notice that any objections were to 

be filed within twenty-one days from the date of service of that order. To date, no party has filed 

objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 

Case 1:15-cv-01072-LJO-JLT Document 21 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that 

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper 

analysis. 

Accordingly, the court orders as follows:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 26, 2016 (Doc. No. 20), are 

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED IN PART;

3. Grounds One through Five, Seven, and Eight are DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE AS UNEXHAUSTED; 

4. The matter is REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings 

on Ground Six.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01072-LJO-JLT Document 21 Filed 09/16/16 Page 2 of 2