Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02973/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02973-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

CAMPBELL CORNERS LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP, a Michigan

limited partnership;

CASTELLINO VILLAS, A K.F. LLC,

a California Limited Liability

Company,

No. CIV. S-09-2973 FCD EFB

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER

EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, an

Illinois corporation; PICERNE

CONSTRUCTION CORP. dba CAMEL

CONSTRUCTION, an Arizona

corporation; CNC CONTRACTORS,

INC. dba SUNBELT CNC

CONTRACTORS, a Texas

corporation; CJS PLUMBING,

INC., a Nevada corporation;

AMERICAN UNDERLAYMENT SYSTEMS,

INC., a California

corporations, and DOES 1

through 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

----oo0oo----

This matter is before the court on the motion of plaintiff

Castellino Villas, A K.F. LLC, (“Castellino”) to transfer venue

to the United States District Court for the Central District of

Case 2:09-cv-02973-FCD-EFB Document 21 Filed 01/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Plaintiff Castellino is wholly owned by plaintiff

Campbell Corners Limited Partnership. (Pl.’s Mot. to Transfer,

filed Oct. 29, 2009, at 3 n.1). 

2 Because oral argument will not be of material

assistance, the court orders the matter submitted on the briefs.

E.D. Cal. L. R. 78-230(h).

2

California for referral to the Bankruptcy Court of the Central

District of California Los Angeles division, which is currently

presiding over Castellino’s chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. 28

U.S.C. § 1412 provides that “[a] district court may transfer a

case or proceeding under title 11 to a district court for another

district, in the interest of justice or for the convenience of

the parties.” All defendants filed statements of non-opposition

to the motion to transfer.1

 Good cause having been shown,2

plaintiff’s motion to transfer is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 13, 2010 

 

FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:09-cv-02973-FCD-EFB Document 21 Filed 01/13/10 Page 2 of 2