Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-06624/USCOURTS-ca4-19-06624-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6624

TAKAEUS MAKEON GRAHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MAJOR T. JARRELL, Correctional Officer; LIEUTENANT D. ANDERSON, 

Correctional Officer; R. TUCKER, Correctional Officer; A. DAVID ROBINSON; 

CARL A. MANIS, Warden for Nottoway Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (2:16-cv-00063-MSD-RJK)

Submitted: January 14, 2020 Decided: January 16, 2020

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Takaeus Makeon Graham, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-6624 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/16/2020 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Takaeus M. Graham appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for 

failure to comply with a prior court order.*

 On appeal, we confine our review to the issues 

raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Graham’s informal brief 

does not challenge the district court’s dispositive procedural ruling, Graham has forfeited 

appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th 

Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our 

review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment and deny Graham’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The district court’s order is final and appealable because it dismissed Graham’s 

complaint “for procedural reasons unrelated to the contents of the pleadings.” Goode v. 

Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 624 (4th Cir. 2015). 

USCA4 Appeal: 19-6624 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/16/2020 Pg: 2 of 2