Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04908/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04908-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING 

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFS.’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

COMPL, PLTFS.’ OPP. BRIEF, AND DEFS.’ REPLY 

BRIEF; CASE NO. C-04-4908-JW(PVT) 

PALIB1_2736366_1 (4).DOC 

TERRY T. JOHNSON, State Bar No. 121569 

BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838 

CHERYL W. FOUNG, State Bar No. 108868 

OLGA TKACHENKO, State Bar No. 228645 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Defendants

UTSTARCOM, INC., HONG LIANG LU, 

MICHAEL J. SOPHIE, HOWARD KWOCK 

GERALD S. SOLOWAY, SHAO-NING J. CHOU, 

WILLIAM H. HUANG, YING WU, AND 

THOMAS J. TOY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IN RE UTSTARCOM, INC. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

)

)

)

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Master File No. C-04-4908-JW(PVT) 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING 

PAGE LIMITS FOR UTSTARCOM 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS FIRST AMENDED 

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT, 

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION BRIEF, 

AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEF 

Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 84 Filed 10/07/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING 

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFS.’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

COMPL., PLTFS.’ OPP. BRIEF, AND DEFS.’ REPLY 

BRIEF; CASE NO. C-04-4908-JW(PVT) 

-1- PALIB1_2736366_1 (4).DOC 

WHEREAS, on July 26, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a two hundred and fifty-eight paragraph 

First Amended Consolidated Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws consisting of 

210 pages and asserting a class period of nineteen months; 

WHEREAS, Civil L.R. 7-2(b) provides for a twenty-five (25) page limit on the motion 

and supporting memorandum to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Complaint (“Motion to 

Dismiss”) by Defendants UTStarcom, Inc., Hong Liang Lu, Michael J. Sophie, Howard Kwock, 

Gerald S. Soloway, Shao-Ning J. Chou, William H. Huang, Ying Wu, and Thomas Toy 

(collectively, “Defendants”), scheduled to be filed on October 10, 2005; 

WHEREAS, Civil L.R. 7-3(a) provides for a twenty-five (25) page limit on Plaintiffs’ 

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Brief; 

WHEREAS, Civil L.R. 7-3(c) provides for a fifteen (15) page limit on Defendants’ Reply 

Brief;

WHEREAS, the parties believe that given the number of allegations raised by the 

Plaintiffs’ complaint, and Defendants’ desire and intent to address the allegations in a 

comprehensive and thorough fashion, it is appropriate to allow Defendants and Plaintiffs 

additional pages beyond the amount provided by the L.R. 7-2 and 7-3; 

WHEREAS, Defendants believe that they need no more than thirty-six (36) pages for their 

Motion to Dismiss; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs believe they need no more than forty-one (41) pages for their 

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Brief; and 

WHEREAS, Defendants believe that they need no more than eighteen (18) pages for their 

Reply Brief;

THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows: 

1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Reply Brief will not exceed thirty-six (36) and 

eighteen (18) pages, respectively, exclusive of the caption page, the table of contents, table of 

authorities, declarations, and exhibits. 

Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 84 Filed 10/07/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING 

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFS.’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

COMPL., PLTFS.’ OPP. BRIEF, AND DEFS.’ REPLY 

BRIEF; CASE NO. C-04-4908-JW(PVT) 

-2- PALIB1_2736366_1 (4).DOC 

2. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Brief will not exceed 

forty-one (41) pages, exclusive of the caption page, the table of contents, table of authorities, 

declarations, and exhibits.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 6, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

 Professional Corporation 

 

By: /s/ Cheryl Foung 

 Cheryl Foung 

Attorneys for Defendants

UTSTARCOM, INC., HONG LIANG LU, 

MICHAEL J. SOPHIE, HOWARD KWOCK 

GERALD S. SOLOWAY, SHAO-NING J. CHOU, 

WILLIAM H. HUANG, YING WU, AND 

THOMAS J. TOY 

Dated: October 6, 2005 LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

 

By: /s/ Kimberly Epstein 

 Kimberly Epstein 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ORDER

 PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 The Honorable James Ware 

 United States District Court Judge 

Oct. 07, 2005

Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 84 Filed 10/07/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING 

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFS.’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

COMPL., PLTFS.’ OPP. BRIEF, AND DEFS.’ REPLY 

BRIEF; CASE NO. C-04-4908-JW(PVT) 

-3- PALIB1_2736366_1 (4).DOC 

ATTESTATION 

I, Terry T. Johnson, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation to Expand Page Limits and [Proposed] Order. I hereby attest that Cheryl W. Foung 

and Kimberly C. Epstein concur in this filing. 

Dated: October 6, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ TERRY T. JOHNSON 

 TERRY T. JOHNSON 

Attorneys for Defendants UTStarcom Inc., 

Hong Liang Lu, Michael J. Sophie, Howard 

Kwock, Gerald S. Soloway, Shao-Ning J. 

Chou, William H. Huang, Ying Wu, and 

Thomas Toy 

Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 84 Filed 10/07/05 Page 4 of 4