Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-00219/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-00219-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Eduardo Guzman-Duarte,

 Petitioner,

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

 Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-13-00219-PHX-PGR (BSB)

 ORDER

 

 

Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Bade notwithstanding that no party has filed any objections to the Report and

Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly concluded that

the petitioner’s habeas petition, timely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, should be

denied because the petitioner waived his claims asserted in Grounds One, Two and

Three by pleading guilty, and because his claims in Ground Four are not cognizable

on federal habeas review. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(Doc. 20) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that the petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, as supplemented,

Case 2:13-cv-00219-PGR Document 21 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

- 2 -

is denied and that this action is dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because the petitioner has not made

a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment

accordingly.

DATED this 9th day of March, 2015.

Case 2:13-cv-00219-PGR Document 21 Filed 03/09/15 Page 2 of 2