Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02002/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02002-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ORDER DENYING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, VACATING TRO, AND QUASHING SERVICE OF PROCESS - C 06-cv-02002-MJJ

Alan Steven Wolf, Bar No. 94665

Daniel K. Fujimoto, Bar No. 158575

THE WOLF FIRM

A Law Corporation

245 Fischer Ave., Suite A-9

Costa Mesa, California 92626

Tel: (949) 720-9200 Fax: (949) 608-0128

Daniel.Fujimoto@wolffirm.com

Specially Appearing for Defendant, WELLS

FARGO BANK, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JEFFREY HEIL and PAULA HEIL,

individuals,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a California

Corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. C 06-cv-02002-MJJ

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, VACATING

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AND

QUASHING SERVICE OF PROCESS

Date: March 31, 2006

Time: 11:00 a.m.

Ctrm: 11

U.S. District Court

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

This matter came before the Court on an Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary

Injunction Should Not Issue on the above date and time. Peter W. Clerides appeared on

behalf of Plaintiffs, Jeffrey Heil and Paula Heil, and Mark Oto appeared specially on behalf

of The Wolf Firm, appearing specially for Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

The Court, having considered the pleadings, papers, and documents filed in this case

with respect to this matter, and finding that service had not been properly made, makes the

following order:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service of the Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a

Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue and all supporting documents is hereby quashed;

Case 3:06-cv-02002-MJJ Document 20 Filed 04/06/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cv-02002-MJJ Document 30 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 2
474-2357 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ORDER DENYING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, VACATING TRO, AND QUASHING SERVICE OF PROCESS - C 06-cv-02002-MJJ

2. Plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction is denied; and

3. The Temporary Restraining Order issued on March 20, 2006 is vacated.

DATED: __________

________________________________________

Judge of the Federal District Court for the

Northern District of California

Case 3:06-cv-02002-MJJ Document 20 Filed 04/06/2006 Page 2 of 2

4/12/2006

Case 3:06-cv-02002-MJJ Document 30 Filed 04/12/06 Page 2 of 2