Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07016/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07016-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7016

CHARLES T. HOYE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; 

GARY L. BASS, Reg. Administrator, Virginia Department of 

Corrections, Central Regional Office; SAMUEL V. PRUETT, 

Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center; I. T. GILMORE, 

Assistant Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center; R. W. 

MARTIN, EBP/Reentry Manager, Coffeewood Correctional Center; 

D. GOURDINE, Inst. Pgms. Mgr. (IPM), Coffeewood Correctional 

Center; L. D. MOORE, Food Service Admin., Coffeewood 

Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District 

Judge. (7:14-cv-00124-MFU)

Submitted: December 29, 2015 Decided: January 13, 2016

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-7016 Doc: 15 Filed: 01/13/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Charles T. Hoye, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7016 Doc: 15 Filed: 01/13/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Charles T. Hoye appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoye v. 

Clarke, No. 7:14-cv-00124-MFU (W.D. Va. May 27, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-7016 Doc: 15 Filed: 01/13/2016 Pg: 3 of 3