Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00478/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00478-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE EDWARD BEJARAN, 

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

DERRAL ADAMS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1:09 cv 00478 AWY YNP SMS (PC)

ORDER RE: FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS 

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS

Document # 16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

72-302.

On December 15, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending

dismissal of Defendants Adams, Machenro, Rodriguez, Silva, Lopez-Espinosa, Briggs, Rangel,

CDCR and Corcoran State Prison be dismissed. The court also recommended dismissal of

Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claim. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections

within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305,

this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

analysis.

Case 1:09-cv-00478-AWI -SMS Document 24 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on December 15,

2009, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants Adams, Machenro, Rodriguez, Silva, Lopez-Espinosa, Briggs, Rangel,

CDCR and Corcoran State Prison are dismissed, and Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claim is

dismissed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-00478-AWI -SMS Document 24 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2