Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00318/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00318-37/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff has requested an additional 15-day extension of time to file an opposition to the 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations for grant of Defendants’ motion for 

terminating sanctions. Doc. # 315. Plaintiff states he has suffered an apparent relapse of a viral 

infection that was the basis of the court’s grant of the previous extension. Plaintiff’s motion for 

additional extension of time will be granted. To the extent Plaintiff has requested monetary 

sanctions for Defendant’s conduct, the request will be denied. In view of the stay in place barring 

any filings other than those pertaining directly to response to the Magistrate Judges Findings and 

Recommendations, Plaintiff is directed to address any further requests for extension of time 

directly to the court.

THEREFORE, for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the filing deadline for 

Plaintiff’s opposition to the Magistrate Judges Findings and Recommendations is EXTENDED to 

Thursday, April 16, 2015, at 4:00 p.m. Defendants’ response to Plaintiffs opposition shall be filed 

and served not later than 4:00 p.m. on April 30, 2015. The stay placed on ALL other filings or 

activities in this case is hereby EXTENDED to May 15, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

EUGENE E. FORTE,

Plaintiff

v.

COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., 

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-0318 AWI BAM

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

REQUEST FOR FURTHER 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

OPPOSITION TO MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S FINDIINGS AND 

RECOMMENDANTIONS

Doc. # 315

Case 1:11-cv-00318-AWI-BAM Document 317 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 1