Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01003/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01003-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARMENCITA S. HIPOLITO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-05-1003 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On June 8, 2005, defendants electronically filed an answer in the above-titled action. 

Defendants have violated General Order 45 and the Court’s standing orders, however, by

failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the

day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name,

case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also

Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of the above-referenced

document. The parties are hereby advised that if either party fails in the future to comply

with the Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Case 3:05-cv-01003-MMC Document 10 Filed 06/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court may impose sanctions on the noncomplying party, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2005 

/s/ Maxine M. Chesney 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01003-MMC Document 10 Filed 06/14/05 Page 2 of 2