Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01611/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01611-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

eMAG SOLUTIONS, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. C 02-1611 PJH

v. ORDER

TODA KOGYO CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

No later than Friday, October 13, 2006, the parties remaining in the above-entitled

action shall file a joint statement, setting forth their respective positions regarding the

current status of the case, and advising the court whether the remaining defendants intend

to file motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, and if so, when they plan on filing

such motions. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 6, 2006 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 265 Filed 10/06/06 Page 1 of 1