Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05108/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05108-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 130
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40:270 Miller Act

---

1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE STAY 

51166.01/4360-180020/P 

Case No.: 

C-07-5108-JSW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES of AMERICA for the Use 

and Benefit of BERGER BROS., INC., a 

California Corporation 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

DICK/MORGANTI, a California joint 

venture; DICK CORPORATION, a 

Pennsylvania corporation; THE MORGANTI 

GROUP, INC., a Connecticut corporation; 

AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF 

READING, PENNYSYLVANNIA, a 

Pennsylvania corporation; NATIONAL 

UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

PITTSBURGH, PA, a Pennsylvania 

corporation; CONTINENTAL CASUALTY 

COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: C-07-5108-JSW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

ADMINISTRATIVE STAY 

Action Filed: October 4, 2007 

Trial Date: TBD 

Case 3:07-cv-05108-JSW Document 12 Filed 01/08/08 Page 1 of 2
2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE STAY 

51166.01/4360-180020/P 

Case No.: 

C-07-5108-JSW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court, having considered the January 7, 2008 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND 

JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed 

by Plaintiff and Defendants wherein the parties requested that the Case Management Conference 

for this case be continued until a date after May 30, 2008, and good cause appearing, hereby

continues the Case Management Conference set for January 11, 2008 until June ____, 2008 at 

_________. The Court furthermore orders that this case shall be administratively closed until 

such time that either a dismissal is filed or one of the parties notifies the Court that the settlement 

was not completed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: , 2008 

 United States District Court Judge 

 Northern District Court of California 

6

1:30pm January 8

Case 3:07-cv-05108-JSW Document 12 Filed 01/08/08 Page 2 of 2