Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-02010/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-02010-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL PALLAMARY,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 17cv2010-WQH-BGS

ORDER

v.

ELITE SHOW SERVICES, INC., a

California corporation; CITY OF SAN

DIEGO, a municipal corporation;

OFFICER ZACHARY DIGIOIA, an

individual; SERGEANT JENNIFER

ATWOOD, an individual;

DETECTIVE JULIE ADAMS, an

individual; QUALCOMM STADIUM

MEDICAL STAFF 1-3, individuals;

the CHARGERS FOOTBALL

COMPANY, LLC, a California limited

liability company; BARBARA

JOHNSON, an individual; DANIEL

JOHNSON, an individual; and DOES

1 through 30, inclusive

Defendants.

HAYES, Judge:

The matters before the Court are the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant City

of San Diego (“the City”) (ECF No. 2), the motion to dismiss or alternatively quash

service of summons by specially-appearing Defendants San Diego Police Department

Officers 1-3 (“SDPD Officers 1-3”)(ECF No. 4); and the motion to dismiss and the

motion to strike filed by Defendants Elite Show Services, Inc. (“Elite”), Barbara

Johnson, and Daniel Johnson (ECF No. 8, 9).

- 1 - 17cv2010-WQH-BGS

Case 3:17-cv-02010-WQH-BGS Document 38 Filed 01/02/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On July 5, 2017, Plaintiff Michael Pallamary initiated this action by filing a

complaint in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego against

Defendants Elite, the City, SDPD Officers 1-3, Qualcomm Stadium Medical Staff 1-3,

Chargers Football Company (“Chargers”), Barbara Johnson, Daniel Johnson and doe

defendants. (ECF No. 1). The action was removed to this Court on September 29,

2017. Id. 

On October 5, 2017, Defendant City filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. 

(ECF No. 2). 

On October 5, 2017, the “specially appearing” Defendants SDPD Officers 1-3

filed a motion to dismiss or alternatively quash service of summons. (ECF No. 4). 

On October 18, 2017, Defendants Elite, Barbara Johnson, and Daniel Johnson

filed a motion to dismiss the complaint and a motion to strike portions of the complaint. 

(ECF No. 8,9). 

On December 20, 2017, Plaintiff and Defendants City, Elite, Barbara Johnson,

Daniel Johnson, and the Chargers filed a joint motion to permit Plaintiff to file a first

amended complaint.1

 (ECF No. 30).

On December 21, 2017, the Court granted the motion and granted leave to file

a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 31). On December 22, 2017, Plaintiff filed the

First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 32). 

Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint in this action. Once filed, an amended

complaint supersedes the original complaint in its entirety. See Ramirez v. Cty. of San

Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). The pending motions to dismiss,

motion to strike, and motion to dismiss or in the alternative quash service, addressing

the original complaint, became moot once the first amended complaint was filed. 

Further, the “San Diego Police Officers 1-3” are no longer listed as a party in the

1

 Qualcomm Stadium Medical Staff 1-3, who has not yet appeared in this action, was not a party to the joint motion. San Diego Police Officers 1-3, who “specially appeared” to challenge service of process, were not a party to the joint motion. The amended complaint names new individual defendants and does not list “San Diego Police Officers 1-3” as defendants. 

- 2 - 17cv2010-WQH-BGS

Case 3:17-cv-02010-WQH-BGS Document 38 Filed 01/02/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

amended complaint. (ECF No. 32). 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions are denied as moot and without

prejudice. (ECF Nos. 2,4, 8, 9). 

DATED: January 2, 2018

WILLIAM Q. HAYES

United States District Judge

- 3 - 17cv2010-WQH-BGS

Case 3:17-cv-02010-WQH-BGS Document 38 Filed 01/02/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 3