Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01063/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01063-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SACRAMENTO DIVISION)

TERRI S. O’NEAL, individually and as

successor-in-interest to the Estate of

BENJAMIN L. BRATT; BARRY M. BRATT,

individually;

Plaintiffs,

vs.

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION,

D/B/A GLAXOSMITHKLINE, A Pennsylvania

Corporation; 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 06-cv-01063-FCD-DAD

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX

PARTE APPLICATION TO

CONDITIONALLY SEAL DOCUMENTS

AND EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANT GLAXOSMITHKLINE’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

RE PREEMPTION

“AS MODIFIED”

The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ ex parte application to conditionally seal documents

and exhibits in support of Plaintiffs’ opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment on

preemption grounds. Said documents include: 

(1) Documents attached to the Declaration of George W. Murgatroyd III as Exhibits 2-

12, 16-19, 21, 29, 31, 40, 42, 43, 45, 56, 59, 62, 63 and 65;

(2) Documents attached to the Declaration of Joseph Glenmullen, M.D., as Exhibits 1

and 2; and

(3) Documents attached to the Declaration of Roger Grimson, Ph.D., as Exhibit 1.

The Court will consider the propriety of unsealing these documents in conjunction with

ruling on defendant’s motion for summary judgment on preemption grounds. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November 15, 2007 

Case 2:06-cv-01063-FCD-DAD Document 154 Filed 11/15/07 Page 1 of 1