Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520-1187/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RALPH COLEMAN, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P 

ORDER 

 On March 5, 2021, the Special Master filed his Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring 

Report (hereafter Report) ECF No. 7074. By order filed July 14, 2021, the court directed the 

Special Master to, within fourteen days, 

file an addendum to the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring Report 

that (a) clarifies the method used to calculate the telepsychiatry 

vacancy rate reported in the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring 

Report; and (b) clarifies what documentation his team requested for 

verification of custody and mental health staff training required by 

the custody mental health partnership plan that defendants did not 

provide, either in initial uploads or with their response to the draft 

Report, and also makes such additional modifications to the Report, 

if any, that may be required in connection with this clarification. 

July 14, 2021 Order, ECF No. 7229, at 8. Except as specifically noted in the order, the court 

overruled defendants’ objections to the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring Report and signaled it 

anticipated “adopting the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring Report as supplemented.” Id. 

///// 

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 7566 Filed 06/09/22 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 2 

 On July 28, 2021, the Special Master filed the required addendum. ECF No. 7251. 

As required, the addendum (a) clarifies the method used in the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring 

Report to calculate the telepsychiatry vacancy rate reported there; and (b) clarifies what 

documentation requested by his team to verify custody and mental health staff training required 

by the custody mental partnership plan was not provided by defendants. With respect to the 

clarification provided for category (b), the Special Master concluded it was not necessary to 

revise the Twenty-Eighth Round Monitoring Report. ECF No. 7251 at 8. 

 Consistent with this court’s July 14, 2021 order, ECF No. 7229, and good cause 

appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Special Master’s Twenty-Eighth Round 

Monitoring Report, ECF No. 7074, is adopted as supplemented by the July 28, 2021 addendum 

thereto, ECF No. 7251. 

DATED: June 8, 2022. 

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 7566 Filed 06/09/22 Page 2 of 2