Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05152/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05152-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NUMBER: C 07-05152 JW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Daniel M. Wall (Bar No. 102580) 

Alfred C. Pfeiffer, Jr. (Bar No. 120965) 

Christopher S. Yates (Bar No. 161273) 

Adrian F. Davis (Bar No. 215827) 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111-6538 

Telephone: (415) 391-0600 

Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 

Email: Dan.Wall@lw.com

Email: Al.Pfeiffer@lw.com

Email: Chris.Yates@lw.com

Email: Adrian.Davis@lw.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

PAUL HOLMAN and LUCY RIVELLO, 

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

APPLE, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 07-05152 JW 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT APPLE INC. AND 

DEFENDANT AT&T MOBILITY, LLC TO 

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge James Ware

11/02/2007

Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW Document 18 Filed 11/02/07 Page 1 of 3
1 IT is HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs Paul

2 Holman and Lucy Rivello and Defendants Apple Inc. ("Apple") and AT&T Mobilty LLC

3 ("AT&T"), through their respective counsel that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1 (a), the time in

4 which Apple and AT&T may move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint,

5 which was fied on October 5, 2007 (see Docket Item #1), is extended to December 7, 2007.

6 IT is FURTHER STIPULATED that if Apple and/or AT&T respond to the

7 Complaint through a motion, the parties agree that plaintiffs' opposition to the motion shall be

8 fied on January 10, 2008, that defendants' reply brief shall be filed on January 21, 2008, and that

9 any such motions shall be set for hearing on Februar 4, 2008 or another date thereafter that the

10 Court is available.

11 These changes wil not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by

Respectfully submitted,

FOLKENFLIK & McGERITY

By

Max F enflik

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

PAUL HOLMA and LUCY

Respectfully submitted,

CROWELL & MORIG LLP

BY~~¿'4 :an - s;'. - .

Attorneys for Defendant

AT&T MOBILITY LLC

LATHAM"WATKINSL"

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NUBER: C 07 -05152 JW

Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW Document 18 Filed 11/02/07 Page 2 of 3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 2

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NUMBER: C 07-05152 JW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: October 31, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

By /s/ Christopher S. Yates 

Christopher S. Yates 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

 SF\631281 

Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW Document 18 Filed 11/02/07 Page 3 of 3