Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02389/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02389-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:6901 Resource &amp; Recovery Act

---

-1- 

STIPULATION TO STRIKE REQUESTS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

OC/340850v1 

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 

CURTIS D. PARVIN Bar No. 116079 

RICHARD CRITES Bar No. 204639 

3 Park Plaza, 17th Floor 

Irvine, California 92614-8540 

Telephone: (949) 852-8200 

Facsimile: (949) 852-8282 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Third Party Defendant MAYTAG CORPORATION, as 

successor in interest and/or surviving corporation of 

NORGE CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PAYLESS CLEANERS, et al., 

Defendants. 

RICHARD C. PETERS and RAMONA W. 

PETERS, individually and as Trustee of the 

PETERS FAMILY TRUST, 

Third Party Plaintiffs, 

v. 

VICTOR STRAIN; NORGE 

CORPORATION, MAYTAG 

CORPORATION, as successor in interest 

and/or surviving corporation of NORGE 

CORPORATION; A. DODD CARR, 

MARVEL L. CARR and DOES 1 through 

50, inclusive, 

Third Party Defendants 

CASE NO. CIVS-02-2389 LKK DAD

ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO 

HONORABLE LAWRENCE K. KARLTON 

 COURTROOM 4 

COMPLAINT FILED: 10/31/02 

TRIAL DATE: NONE 

SET

STIPULATION TO STRIKE PRAYERS 

FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES IN SECOND 

AMENDED THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT 

OF RICHARD C. PETERS AND RAMONA 

W. PETERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

TRUSTEE OF THE PETERS FAMILY 

TRUST AND IN THE ANSWER THERETO 

BY MAYTAG CORPORATION, AS 

SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST AND/OR 

SURVIVING CORPORATION OF NORGE 

CORPORATION 

Case 2:02-cv-02389-LKK -DAD Document 158 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

STIPULATION TO STRIKE REQUESTS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

OC/340850v1 

WHEREAS the parties hereto wish to resolve a dispute regarding their respective requests 

for attorneys’ fees without undue consumption of the Court’s resources; 

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, 

through their respective attorneys of record, that the parties’ requests for attorneys’ fees are 

stricken, without prejudice, from the following pleadings: 

1) The Second Amended Third Party Complaint of the Peters, p. 12, lines 13-14, and p. 

16, line 19; and 

2) The Answer to the Peters’ Second Amended Third Party Complaint by Maytag 

Corporation, as successor in interest and/or surviving corporation of Norge Corporation, p. 17, 

line 8; 

IT IS FURTHER AGREED AND STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, 

through their respective attorneys of record, that any party to this stipulation may bring a motion 

to amend their respective pleading to request attorneys’ fees in the event that further discovery 

gives rise to such a prayer. 

IT IS FURTHER AGREED AND STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, 

through their respective attorneys of record, that the Peters’ pending motion to strike Maytag’s 

attorneys’ fees, calendared for June 13, 2005, shall be taken off calendar. Should the Court not 

sign the attached Order by June 30, 2005, the Peters may re-calendar their pending motion to 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:02-cv-02389-LKK -DAD Document 158 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

STIPULATION TO STRIKE REQUESTS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

OC/340850v1 

strike Maytag’s attorneys’ fees. Maytag would not raise the passage of time as a defense to any 

such re-calendaring and Maytag would not be prejudiced in opposing said motion. 

DATED: May __, 2005 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 

By: /signature on original

CURTIS D. PARVIN 

RICHARD A. CRITES 

Attorneys for Third Party Defendant MAYTAG 

 CORPORATION, as successor in interest and/or 

 surviving corporation of NORGE 

 CORPORATION 

DATED: May __, 2005 GREBEN & ASSOCIATES 

By: /signature on original

JAN A. GREBEN 

JOSEPH B. ADAMS 

Attorneys for Third Party Plaintiffs RICHARD C. 

 PETERS AND RAMONA W. PETERS, 

 individually and as Trustee of the PETERS 

 FAMILY TRUST 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 27, 2005 

 /s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

 Lawrence K. Karlton 

 Senior Judge 

Case 2:02-cv-02389-LKK -DAD Document 158 Filed 05/31/05 Page 3 of 3