Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01230/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01230-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EARON DREVON DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL A. JACQUES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-1230-DAD-JDP (PS)

ORDER

Plaintiff was previously granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 8. 

Judgment was entered in this action on November 7, 2024. ECF No. 36. Plaintiff subsequently 

filed a notice of appeal and a request to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 37 & 38. 

The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that:

A party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district-court action 

. . . may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization unless 

the district court . . . certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith or finds that 

the party is not otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis . . . . 

Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). This court has not certified that plaintiff’s appeal is not taken in good 

faith and has not otherwise found that plaintiff is not entitled to proceed on appeal in forma 

pauperis. 

Case 2:23-cv-01230-DAD-JDP Document 40 Filed 12/09/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal, ECF No. 38, is denied as unnecessary. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 9, 2024 

JEREMY D. PETERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:23-cv-01230-DAD-JDP Document 40 Filed 12/09/24 Page 2 of 2