Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00847/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00847-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2007\0847\orderreegelhoff.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

QUYEN LE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY, et al., 

Defendants. /

No. C 07-00847 CRB

ORDER

In reviewing the parties’ papers in connection with the April 6, 2007 hearing on

plaintiff’s motion to remand and defendant Metropolitan’s motion to dismiss, the Court

observed that the parties did not discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in Egelhoff v.

Egelhoff, 532 U.S. 141 (2001). The parties should be prepared to address this case at oral

argument.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 3, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-00847-CRB Document 21 Filed 04/03/07 Page 1 of 1