Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06273/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06273-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT—C-06-06273 RMW

SPT

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 2/28/07

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MELISSA PRINCE,

Plaintiff,

v.

ACCESS RECOVERY GROUP, INC.,

Defendant.

No. C-06-06273 RMW

ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT AGAINST

DEFENDANT

[Re Docket No. 13]

On October 4, 2006 plaintiff Melissa Prince ("Prince") sued defendant Access Recovery

Group, Inc. ("Access") for violation of the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.

§ 1692 et seq. and the California Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Cal. Civ. Code

§ 1788 et seq. Access answered the complaint on November 30, 2006. On January 26, 2007 the

matter came on regularly for a case management conference. Access did not appear and did not file

a case management statement. 

The court issued an order to show cause requiring Access to appear through counsel on

February 23, 2007 to show cause why default and default judgment should not be entered for failure

to appear at the case management conference and for failure to file a case management statement. 

The court further indicated that should defendant fail to show good cause for its failure, default and

Case 5:06-cv-06273-RMW Document 15 Filed 02/28/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 No application for default judgment has been filed by plaintiff as of the date of this order. 

ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT—C-06-06273 RMW

SPT 2

default judgment would be entered against defendant upon application by plaintiff.1 Defendant

made no appearance on February 23, 2007. At the hearing plaintiff indicated it sought entry of

default against defendant. 

Accordingly, the court hereby enters default against defendant. In addition, defendant's

answer to plaintiff's complaint is hereby stricken. 

DATED: 2/27/07

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-06273-RMW Document 15 Filed 02/28/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT—C-06-06273 RMW

SPT 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

William E. Kennedy wkennedy@pacbell.net 

Counsel for Defendant:

Harry Tom Miller tomlaw@earthlink.net

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 2/28/07 SPT

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:06-cv-06273-RMW Document 15 Filed 02/28/07 Page 3 of 3