Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00484/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00484-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Barry Lamon is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 10, 2013, Defendants filed a motion to revoke Plaintiff’s 

in forma pauperis status. See Doc. Nos. 43.

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 11, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to file a 

surreply to the motion to revoke. See Doc. No. 69. On January 27, 2014, the Magistrate Judge 

filed a Findings and Recommendations (F&&R) that recommended denying Defendants’ motion. 

See Doc. No. 74. The F&R, which was served on Plaintiff, contained notice that Objections to the 

F&R were to be filed within thirty days. Despite the recommendation, Plaintiff filed an objection. 

See Doc. Nos. 77, 78.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 

F&R to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

BARRY LOUIS LAMON,

Plaintiff

v.

MAURICE JUNIOUS, et al.,

Defendants

CASE NO. 1:09-CV-484 AWI SAB (PC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. Nos. 43, 69, 74)

Case 1:09-cv-00484-AWI-SAB Document 81 Filed 03/06/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on January 27, 2014, (Doc. No. 74) is adopted 

in full; 

2. Defendant’s motion to revoke (Doc. No. 43) is DENIED; and

3. Plaintiff’s motions to file a surreply (Doc. No. 69) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 5, 2014 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00484-AWI-SAB Document 81 Filed 03/06/14 Page 2 of 2