Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02831/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02831-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 On October 29, 2009, plaintiff’s March 9, 2009 application to proceed in forma

1

pauperis was denied without prejudice because it was incomplete. In addition, the filing fee was

paid in this court by defendant Hoshino when the action was removed from the Sacramento

County Superior Court.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAI TRUONG,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-2831 MCE DAD P

vs.

MARTIN HOSHINO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed an appeal from this court’s dismissal of the action. On January

28, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The motion will be 1

denied without prejudice so that plaintiff may file his motion directly with the U.S. Court of

Appeals for the Ninth Circuit using the form provided by that court. 

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:08-cv-02831-MCE -DAD Document 27 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s January 28, 2010

motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 25) is denied without prejudice.

DATED: February 10, 2010.

DAD:4

tru2831.ifp

Case 2:08-cv-02831-MCE -DAD Document 27 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2