Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00932/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00932-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCO JAVIER SOLORIO LICEA,

Petitioner,

v.

BERNIE ELLIS, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 05-0932 REC SMS HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,

AND DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT 

[Doc. 5]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On September 7, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that

the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED. These Findings and Recommendations

were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty

(30) days of the date of service of the order. 

On September 29, 2005, Petitioner filed timely objections to the Findings and

Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is

supported by the record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Case 1:05-cv-00932-REC -SMS Document 6 Filed 11/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued September 7, 2005, is ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00932-REC -SMS Document 6 Filed 11/18/05 Page 2 of 2