Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00090/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00090-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SF/21693802.1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; STIPULATION REGARDING THE PARTIES’ BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

Michael G. Woods #058683-0 

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, 

Wayte & Carruth LLP 

P O Box 28912 

5 River Park Place East 

Fresno, CA 93720-1501 

Telephone: (559) 433-1300 

Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

JENNIFER G. REDMOND (SBN 144790) 

BRYAN E. DALEY (SBN 227517) 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 

Telephone: (415) 393-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 

Attorneys for Defendant 

GALLO GLASS COMPANY 

Mina L. Ramirez (SBN 118302) 

Law Office of Mina L. Ramirez 

1012 Eleventh St., Suite 200 

Modesto, CA 95354 

Tel: (209) 491-0590 

Fax: (209) 575-9497 

Lawrence D. Murray (SBN 77536) 

Noah W. Kanter (SBN 224580) 

Murray & Associates 

1781 Union Street 

San Francisco, CA 94123 

Tel: (415) 673-0555 

Fax: (415) 928-4084 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LARRY K. BOECKEN, JR. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LARRY BOECKEN, JR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GALLO GLASS COMPANY, and DOES 1 

THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, 

Defendant. 

No. 1:05-CV-90 OWW DLB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE HEARING ON CROSS 

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT/ADJUDICATION; 

STIPULATION REGARDING THE 

PARTIES’ BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00090-LJO-BAM Document 42 Filed 11/28/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SF/21693802.1 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; STIPULATION REGARDING THE PARTIES’ BRIEFING SCHEDULE

IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH 

THEIR COUNSEL, AS FOLLOWS: 

1. On October 11, 2006, the Court issued its Order continuing the hearing on the parties’ 

cross motions for summary judgment/adjudication to December 4, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. 

2. That Order also requested that the parties reach a stipulation as to the consolidation of 

each party’s opposition and reply. 

3. On November 1, 2006, the parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order requesting that 

the Court continue the hearing date to January 8, 2007, due to a scheduling conflict on 

the part of Defendant Gallo Glass Company. The Court has not yet approved that 

Proposed Order, and the parties no longer request that the Court do so. 

4. During the parties’ attempts to reach a stipulation as to the consolidation of their 

oppositions and replies, they were unable to find a mutually acceptable briefing 

schedule that would permit them to file their consolidated papers fourteen days prior to 

the newly requested January 8, 2007 hearing date. 

5. In light of this issue, the parties agree to, and seek the Court’s approval of, a 

continuance of the hearing on the parties’ cross motions for summary 

judgment/adjudication to Monday, February 12, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. 

6. The parties further agree to a briefing schedule and procedure as follows: 

 (a) on January 11, 2007, the parties will exchange (via facsimile, email or other means 

ensuring same-day delivery) their respective opposition papers, including a 

Memorandum of Points of Authorities (“MPA”) not to exceed 22 pages; 

 (b) neither side will be permitted to alter its opposition papers once they have been 

exchanged, with the exception that both sides are permitted to add 3 pages to their 

MPAs in reply to one another’s opposition; and 

 (c) the parties intend to prepare reply papers in response to one another’s opposition 

papers following the exchange, and the parties agree that the filing deadline for 

opposition and reply papers is January 22, 2007. 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00090-LJO-BAM Document 42 Filed 11/28/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SF/21693802.1 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; STIPULATION REGARDING THE PARTIES’ BRIEFING SCHEDULE

SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: November 21, 2006 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

By: /s/ Bryan E. Daley 

Bryan E. Daley 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Gallo Glass Company 

DATED: November ___, 2006 MURRAY & ASSOCIATES 

By: /s/ Noah W. Kanter 

Noah W. Kanter 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Larry Boecken, Jr. 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING 

 The Court HEREBY ORDERS THAT the hearing on the parties’ cross motions 

for summary judgment/adjudication is continued to February 12, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. 

DATED: _November 22_____, 2006 __/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER________________ 

Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 

Judge of the U.S. District Court 

Eastern District of California 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00090-LJO-BAM Document 42 Filed 11/28/06 Page 3 of 3