Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01940/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01940-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Enlarging Page Limits

Case No. C 05-01940 MHP

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

GEORGE M. NEWCOMBE (202898) gnewcombe@stblaw.com

JEFFREY E. OSTROW (213118) jostrow@stblaw.com

HARRISON J. FRAHN IV (206822) hfrahn@stblaw.com

2550 Hanover Street

Palo Alto, California 94304

Telephone: (650) 251-5000

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant

COLLABORATION PROPERTIES, INC.

WILLIAM L. ANTHONY (State Bar No. 106908)

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (State Bar No. 173985)

BAS DE BLANK (State Bar No. 191487)

RORY G. BENS (State Bar No. 201674)

THERESA A. SUTTON (State Bar No. 211857)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, California 94025

Telephone: 650-614-7400

Facsimile: 650-614-7401

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiff

TANDBERG ASA and TANDBERG, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

COLLABORATION PROPERTIES, INC., a 

Nevada Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

TANDBERG ASA, and TANDBERG, INC. a 

Delaware Corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. C 05-01940 MHP

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING 

PAGE LIMITS

(CIVIL L.R. 7-2, 7-4)

Case 3:05-cv-01940-MHP Document 133 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Enlarging Page Limits

Case No. C 05-01940 MHP

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-2(b), 7-3(a) and (c), 7-4(b), and 7-12 of the Federal 

District Court for the Northern District of California, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 

Collaboration Properties, Inc. (“CPI”) and Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs Tandberg ASA and 

Tandberg, Inc. (collectively, “Tandberg”), by and through their respective counsel, submit this 

Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to increase the page limits for briefs set forth in Civil Local 

Rules 7-2 through 7-4.

WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) states that the number of pages for briefs or 

memoranda filed with opening papers may not exceed 25 pages;

WHEREAS, Civil Local Rules 7-3(a) and 7-4(b) state that the number of pages for 

briefs or memoranda filed with opposition papers may not exceed 25 pages of text;

WHEREAS, Civil Local Rules 7-3(c) and 7-4(b) state that the number of pages for 

briefs or memoranda filed with reply papers may not exceed 15 pages of text; and

WHEREAS, the parties agreed to a modest increase in the number of pages for 

both parties’ briefs on claims construction.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES JOINTLY REQUEST THE FOLLOWING:

Subject to the Court’s approval, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12 of the Federal 

District Court for the Northern District of California, that:

1. CPI’s Opening Claims Construction Brief will not exceed 35 pages of text.

2. Tandberg’s Opposition Brief on Claims Construction will not exceed 35 pages 

of text.

3. CPI’s Reply Brief on Claims Construction will not exceed 20 pages of text.

///

///

///

Case 3:05-cv-01940-MHP Document 133 Filed 04/13/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Enlarging Page Limits

Case No. C 05-01940 MHP

2

Dated: April 12, 2006 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

 /s/ 

Harrison J. Frahn IV

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant

COLLABORATION PROPERTIES, INC.

Dated: April 12, 2006 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

 /s/

Rory G. Bens

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs

TANDBERG ASA and TANDBERG, INC.

CERTIFICATION

I attest that Rory G. Bens has concurred in the filing of this document.

Dated: April 12, 2006 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

 /s/

Harrison J. Frahn IV

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________, 2006 __________________________________________

Honorable Marilyn H. Patel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

April 13

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:05-cv-01940-MHP Document 133 Filed 04/13/06 Page 3 of 3