Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-03659/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-03659-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Securities Fraud

---

1 

Case No.: 10-CV-03659-LHK 

ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND SETTING HEARING AND BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

**E-Filed: 08/20/2010** 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL #142 PENSION 

TRUST, Derivatively on Behalf of HEWLETTPACKARD COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MARC L. ANDREESSEN, LAWRENCE T. 

BABBIO, SARI M. BALDAUF, RAJIV L. 

GUPTA, JOHN H. HAMMERGREN, MARK V. 

HURD, JOEL Z. HYATT, JOHN R. JOYCE, 

ROBERT L. RYAN, LUCILLE S. SALHANY, 

and G. KENNEDY THOMPSON, 

 Defendants, 

-and - 

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, 

 

Nominal Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: 10-CV-03659-LHK

ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY 

RESTRAINING ORDER AND SETTING 

HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

[re: dkt. no. 3] 

 

 Plaintiff has not complied with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) and Civil Local Rule 

65-1(b). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s application for temporary restraining order is denied without 

prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with its application for temporary restraining order, 

Plaintiff must comply with the aforesaid Rules and file proof of such compliance on or before 

Case 5:10-cv-03659-JW Document 24 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

Case No.: 10-CV-03659-LHK 

ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND SETTING HEARING AND BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

Monday, August 23, 2010. If Plaintiff proceeds with its application for temporary restraining 

order, Defendants shall file any response on or before Wednesday, August 25, 2010. Plaintiff shall 

file any reply on Thursday, August 26, 2010. Hearing is set for Monday, August 30, 2010 at 2 p.m. 

in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor of the San Jose Courthouse. The Court will inform the parties on Friday, 

August 27, 2010 if the matter will be submitted on the briefs and the hearing taken off calendar. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 20, 2010 _________________________________ 

LUCY H. KOH 

United States District Judge 

Case 5:10-cv-03659-JW Document 24 Filed 08/20/10 Page 2 of 2