Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_09-cv-00072/USCOURTS-almd-2_09-cv-00072-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

ANN L. BALLENGER, )

individually and as )

Administratrix of the )

Estate of Thomas )

Ballenger, deceased, and )

MARY ANNA WOEPPEL, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:09cv72-MHT

) (WO) 

SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT )

CORPORATION, a foreign )

Corporation, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motions to strike (Doc. Nos.

161 & 178), filed by defendant Aeronautical Accessories,

Inc., are denied as moot. 

***

With its motions, defendant Aeronautical Accessories,

Inc. (AAI) has moved to strike defendant Sikorsky

Aircraft Corporation’s opposition to AAI’s summaryCase 2:09-cv-00072-MHT-SRW Document 196 Filed 11/04/11 Page 1 of 2
judgment motion. AAI contends that Sikorsky, as codefendant, lacks standing to oppose its summary-judgment

motion. Because in the opinion and order entered today

AAI’s summary-judgment motion fails based on the

plaintiffs’ opposition and the evidence in the record,

AAI’s motions to strike Sikorsky’s opposition are moot.

In other words, today’s opinion and order did not

consider arguments marshaled in Sikorsky’s briefs.

DONE, this the 4th day of November, 2011.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:09-cv-00072-MHT-SRW Document 196 Filed 11/04/11 Page 2 of 2