Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01826/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01826-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNITS

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

 /

This Order Relates To:

ALL ACTIONS

 /

No. C 06-07417 WHA

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

RE MOTION TO STAY

DISCOVERY

For the hearing on Tuesday, defense counsel must be prepared to respond to these

questions:

1. Were the Department of Justice document requests based on CIDs rather than

grand jury subpoenas? Were any CIDs involved?

2. Can a subpoena issue without the grand jury being convened?

3. Have the two defendants or their counsel revealed to each other the

subpoenas/CIDs received and/or the documents provided?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-md-01826-WHA Document 147 Filed 07/06/07 Page 1 of 1