Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04187/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04187-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

PLAINTIFF MARTINI’S UNCONTESTED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL R. LENNIE, Esq. (SBN 048191)

2255 Avenida de la Playa

Suite 7B2

La Jolla, CA 92037

858-456-0138 

858-456-1893 (Fax)

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

FREDERIC H. MARTINI, INC.,a Hawaii 

Corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PEARSON EDUCATION, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation, dba Benjamin 

Cummings,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: CV 04-04187 SI

UNCONTESTED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 

OF PLAINTIFF MARTINI TO FILE REPLY 

TO PEARSON’S OPPOSITION TO 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER 

ENFORCING SETTLEMENT AND 

DECLARATION OF MICHAEL R. LENNIE 

UNDER SEAL; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, Plaintiff Frederic H. Martini Inc. 

(“Martini”) submits this Uncontested Administrative Motion to File Reply to 

Opposition to Motion for Order Enforcing Settlement under Seal. In support 

of this motion, Martini states:

1. In Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Enforcing Settlement and 

supporting papers, Plaintiff describes, interprets, and publishes a document 

entitled, Settlement Terms, and drafts of unexecuted settlement agreements 

exchanged between the parties. (See Stipulation and Order entered May 3, 

2006, at Docket Entry 76, a true and correct copy attached hereto as Exhibit 

A, ¶¶ 1-2, 4-5.) The Settlement Terms and the draft settlement agreements 

contain confidentiality provisions, under which the parties, their auditors, 

Case 3:04-cv-04187-SI Document 88-1 Filed 06/05/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:04-cv-04187-SI Document 90 Filed 06/07/06 Page 1 of 3
PLAINTIFF MARTINI’S UNCONTESTED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and their attorneys agree to keep the terms of the parties’ settlement 

confidential, for use only to enforce the terms of the agreement. (See Ex. A, 

¶¶ 3 & 6.) The parties agreed that Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Enforcing 

Settlement and supporting papers are sealable documents pursuant to 

confidentiality agreements. (See Ex. A, ¶ 7.) The Court ordered that 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Enforcing Settlement and supporting papers be 

filed under seal. (See Ex. A, p.4.)

2. In anticipation that Pearson’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion 

for Order Enforcing Settlement and supporting papers and Plaintiff’s Reply to

Pearson’s Opposition would describe, interpret, and publish the Settlement 

Terms document, draft unexecuted settlement agreements, and related 

confidential discussion between the parties, the parties agreed that both 

Pearson’s Opposition and Martini’s Reply would be sealable and should be 

filed under seal. (See Stipulation and Order, entered May 3, 2006, at Docket 

Entry 77, a true and correct copy attached hereto as Exhibit B, ¶¶ 4-6.) The 

Court therefore ordered that Pearson’s Opposition and Martini’s Reply be 

filed under seal. (See Ex. B, p.3.)

3. Martini’s Reply describes, interprets, and publishes the 

confidential Settlement Terms document, confidential drafts of unexecuted 

settlement agreements, and related confidential discussions between the 

parties. Pursuant to the confidentiality agreements and the confidential 

nature of the settlement discussions, Martini’s Reply is sealable.

4. On May 30, 2006, Pearson’s counsel, Patti Kim, contacted 

Plaintiff’s counsel, Michael R. Lennie, and stated that Defendant does not 

oppose the relief sought in this motion.

5. Michael R. Lennie, Esquire, counsel for Plaintiff, hereby 

declares that Plaintiff Martini’s Reply is sealable, and further declares 

under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that 

the foregoing is true and correct.

Case 3:04-cv-04187-SI Document 88-1 Filed 06/05/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:04-cv-04187-SI Document 90 Filed 06/07/06 Page 2 of 3
PLAINTIFF MARTINI’S UNCONTESTED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: June 4, 2006 _____________________

MICHAEL R. LENNIE

Attorney for Plaintiff

FREDERIC H. MARTINI INC.

PURSUANT TO UNCONTESTED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Plaintiff Frederic H. Martini, Inc.’s Reply to Defendant Pearson Education, 

Inc.’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Enforcing Settlement; Points & 

Authorities; Declaration of Michael Lennie in Support Thereof; and the Exhibits in 

support of said Reply are ORDERED filed under seal in their entirety.

Dated: June ___, 2006

United States District Court Judge

 

Case 3:04-cv-04187-SI Document 88-1 Filed 06/05/2006 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:04-cv-04187-SI Document 90 Filed 06/07/06 Page 3 of 3