Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00543/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00543-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONICA TREVINO, CASE NO. CV F 06-0543-LJO- NEW 

Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

vs. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

SEARS ROEBUCK, INC. AND DOES

1 THROUGH 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

 /

On June 1,2007, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a Notice of Settlement (Doc. 32). The minutes of the

docket text for that document notes that filing a stipulation of dismissal was due by June 25, 2007. In

the Notice of Settlement, however, counsel indicated that a Notice of Dismissal will be filed with this

Court within 30 days of that notice. 

Both the June 25, 2007 and July 1, 2007 deadlines have now passed and counsel has failed to

submit a stipulation for dismissal. Plaintiff’s counsel was previously sanctioned $1500 in this case on

May 4, 2007 for failure to prosecute (Doc. 29). In that order, this Court admonished Plaintiff and

Plaintiff’s counsel to comply with all deadlines in this case and noticed that “[f]ailure to do so will result

in further sanctions, including the probability of dismissal.” Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Order

Granting Sanctions, p.5 n.2 (May 5, 2007). Plaintiff’s counsel is ORDERED to SHOWCAUSE why

this action should not be dismissed. Counsel must file such show of cause with the Court no later than

NOON on July 12, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 5, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00543-LJO -LJO Document 33 Filed 07/05/07 Page 1 of 1