Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01368/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01368-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1368

JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FBI NEWPORT NEWS FIELD OFFICE, JOHN/JANE DOE(S), TECHNICAL 

AGENT(S), acting as a person(s) and member(s) of a criminal 

enterprise under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962; 

CITY OF HAMPTON VIRGINIA POLICE DIVISION’S HOMELAND SECURITY 

UNIT, TECHNICAL POLICE OFFICER(S) JOHN/JANE DOE(S), acting 

as a person(s) and member(s) of a criminal enterprise under 

The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962; CITY OF NEWPORT 

NEWS VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, TECHNICAL POLICE OFFICER(S) 

JOHN/JANE DOE(S), acting as a person and member of a 

criminal enterprise under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. 

Code 1962; HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY, acting as 

a person and member of a criminal enterprise under The 

(RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962; ATTORNEY S. LAWRENCE 

DUMVILLE OF NORRIS, ST. CLAIR & LOTKIN ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 

acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise under 

The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962; ATTORNEY KENNETH 

W. ABRAMS, OF MCGUIRE WOODS LLP, acting as a person and 

member of a criminal enterprise under The (RICO) Act of 

Title 18 U.S. Code 1962,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (4:15-cv-00124-AWA-DEM)

Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 29, 2016

Appeal: 16-1368 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John M. Dickson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1368 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

John M. Dickson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil complaint as untimely and for failure to 

state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Dickson v. FBI Newport 

News Field Office, No. 4:15-cv-00124-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1368 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/29/2016 Pg: 3 of 3