Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01849/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01849-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL LOUIS FOSTER, 1:08-cv-01849-LJO-SMS-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

vs. (Doc. 26.)

A. ENENMOH, et al., ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH 

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM 

ORDER FOR THIS DISMISSAL TO

COUNT AS A STRIKE PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE CASE 

Defendants.

_____________________________/

Michael Louis Foster (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

 On February 19, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending

that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted under section 1983. (Doc. 23.) On April 12, 2010, plaintiff filed objections to the findings

and recommendations. (Doc. 27.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-

305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

1

Case 1:08-cv-01849-LJO-SKO Document 28 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

file, including plaintiff's objections, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on February

19, 2010, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on plaintiff’s failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted under section 1983; 

3. This dismissal shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-01849-LJO-SKO Document 28 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 2