Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-00318/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-00318-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1348 Banking association as party

---

United States District Court

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Defendant.

Plaintiff,

Ronald Satish Emrit 

Wells Fargo Bank, Inc. 

V.

Civil Action No. 18cv318-MMA(JLB)

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried 

or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

CLERK OF COURT 

JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court

R. Chapman, Deputy

By: s/ R. Chapman

Date: 3/21/18

On March 12, 2018, Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, filed an Amended Complaint (“AC”) that attempts to assert claims against Defendant Wells 

Fargo Bank, Inc. Doc. No. 5 (“AC”). The AC suffers from the same deficiencies as the original 

Complaint, which were identified in the Court’s February 14, 2018 Order dismissing with leave to 

amend his initial Complaint. Because Plaintiff again fails to state a claim for relief, and because the 

Court determines that further leave to amend would be futile, the Amended Complaint is dismissed 

with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case and 

to enter judgment accordingly.

Case 3:18-cv-00318-MMA-JLB Document 7 Filed 03/21/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 1