Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00143/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00143-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 2:05-cv-143-GEB-PAN 

EX REL. BILL LOCKYER, ATTORNEY )

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF )

CALIFORNIA, )

) ORDER

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 

)

POWEREX CORP., a Canadian )

Corporation, dba POWEREX ENERGY )

CORP., and DOES 1 - 100, )

)

Defendants. )

)

On August 23, 2005, Defendant Powerex Corp. filed an “Ex

Parte Application of Powerex Corp. for Stay of Remand Proceeding

Pending Resolution of the Appeal to the Ninth Circuit.” However,

“[o]nce a district court certifies a remand order to state court it is

divested of jurisdiction and can take no further action on the case.” 

Seedman v. U.S. Dist. Ct. (Empire of Am.), 837 F.2d 413, 414 (9th Cir.

1988) (per curiam). A certified copy of the remand order was mailed

to the Sacramento Superior Court on August 23, 2005; therefore,

Defendant’s request for a stay is denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 24, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00143-GEB-PAN Document 65 Filed 08/25/05 Page 1 of 1