Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05943/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05943-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DALE LLOYD COTTRELL,

Petitioner,

v.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

CV F 04-5943 SMS HC

ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO SUBMIT

FURTHER STATUS REPORT

[Doc. 39]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), the parties have consented to

the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. 

On December 2, 2005, the Court granted Petitioner’s request to stay the case pending

exhaustion of new claim(s) in the state court. In that order, Petitioner was directed to file a status

report within thirty days from the date of service of that order. The thirty day time period has

passed and Petitioner has not filed a status report. The Court does acknowledge that on

November 18, 2005, prior to the Court’s order granting the stay, Petitioner submitted a status

report indicating that on November 3, 2005, he filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the

Madera County Superior Court and, on November 8, 2005, the Court ordered the State of

California to file a response to the petition within thirty days from the date of service of that

order. (Court Doc. 38.) Petitioner was ordered to file a traverse within thirty days after the

service of the State’s response. (Id.)

Case 1:04-cv-05943-SMS Document 40 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order, Petitioner shall file a

further status report regarding the status of his state habeas corpus petition in accordance with the

Court’s December 2, 2005, order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05943-SMS Document 40 Filed 01/25/06 Page 2 of 2