Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01467/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01467-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 1

 Petitioner was required to deliver his objections to prison officials for mailing on or before

August 23, 2005. The proof of service attached to petitioner’s objections reveals that the document

was mailed on August 28, 2005.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO D. REED,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1467 FCD DAD P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

On August 31, 2005, petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus was

dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Judgment was entered

and the case was closed. On September 1, 2005, the court received petitioner’s untimely

objections to the findings and recommendations that were filed on July 29, 2005.1 IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s untimely objections will be disregarded.

DATED: September 13, 2005.

DAD:13

reed1467.158

Case 2:05-cv-01467-FCD-DAD Document 11 Filed 09/14/05 Page 1 of 1