Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05812/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05812-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOYD HALL III,

Petitioner,

 v.

B. CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. ______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. C 06-5812 MMC (PR)

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

ON APPEAL

On September 21, 2006, petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the

above-titled petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner

paid the filing fee and thus did not proceed in forma pauperis. On July 2, 2009, the Court

denied the petition on the merits. Petitioner has filed a notice of appeal. 

Petitioner now moves to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Petitioner, however, 

has not complied with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Appellate for filing such a

request. Specifically, petitioner has not attached an affidavit that “shows in detail . . . the

party’s inability to pay or give security for the fees and costs.” See Fed. R. App. P.

24(a)(1)(A).

Petitioner having failed to comply with such requirement, petitioner’s request to

proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED.

//

//

Case 3:06-cv-05812-MMC Document 22 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Petitioner may, however, file with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals a motion to

proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(5). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 5, 2010 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05812-MMC Document 22 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 2