Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00068/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00068-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the Findings and Recommendations on March 10, 2008 as undeliverable.

1

A notion indicated: Return to Sender - no longer at this facility. However, plaintiff has not notified the court of any change

in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 83-182(f).

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

HAROLD HILL, )

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

D. SMITH, et. al., )

) 

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 07-0068 OWW DLB P 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE

DISMISSAL OF ACTION

(Doc. 13)

Plaintiff Harold Hill (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On February 29, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein

which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file timely 1

objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:07-cv-00068-OWW -DLB Document 15 Filed 04/08/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 29, 2008, is adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed in its entirety based on plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s

order of January 10, 2008.IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 7, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00068-OWW -DLB Document 15 Filed 04/08/08 Page 2 of 2