Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02779/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02779-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE

COMPANY et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-06-2779 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF AND

TRAVELERS TO LODGE CHAMBERS

COPIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On June 23, 2006, plaintiff electronically filed its answer to the counterclaim of

defendants American Home Assurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance

Company of Pittsburgh, PA. On the same date, third party defendant Travelers Property

Casualty Company of America (“Travelers”) electronically filed its answer to the same

counterclaim. Plaintiff and Travelers have violated General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on

the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy

of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly

marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See

General Order 45 § VII.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff and Travelers are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and

Case 3:06-cv-02779-MMC Document 17 Filed 06/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court’s standing orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of the abovereferenced documents. Plaintiff and Travelers are hereby advised that if they fail in the

future to comply with the Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed 

documents, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the

record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely

provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 30, 2006 MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-02779-MMC Document 17 Filed 06/30/06 Page 2 of 2