Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00079/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00079-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Jackson v. Placer County, et al., Stipulation to Continue Dates for Pleadings

LYLE D. SOLOMON, SBN 226025

P.O. Box 1411

Rocklin, CA 95677

Telephone (916) 532-2726

Facsimile (916) 632-8250

Attorney for

JUDI JACKSON, Plaintiff

BARKETT & GUMPERT

FRANKLIN G. GUMPERT, SBN 66051

2862 Arden Way #101

Sacramento, CA 95825

Telephone (916) 481-3683

Facsimile (916) 481-3948

Attorneys for DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUDI JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PLACER COUNTY, a political

subdivision of the State of California;

PLACER COUNTY ANIMAL

CONTROL; RICHARD WARD, an

individual; ROBERT CARTER, an

individual; RICHARD STOUT, an

individual; KEN GENTILE, an

individual and, EVELYN GARRETT,

an individual.

Defendants

________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No.: CIV.S-05-0079 FCD KJM

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING

TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE

ACCORDING TO ORDER AND

MEMORANDUM ON DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 2:05-cv-00079-FCD-KJM Document 16 Filed 06/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Jackson v. Placer County, et al., Stipulation to Continue Dates for Pleadings

RECITALS

WHEREAS: According to the court’s ruling on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the

court granted plaintiff leave to amend her complaint;

WHEREAS: The parties and their counsel have met, conferred, agreed to submit this

matter to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program and in fact have scheduled this matter for a

session in accordance with the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program to begin on June 21, 2005;

THEREFORE, the parties and their respective attorneys of record do stipulate, agree and

request that the court order that the time for plaintiff to file her amended complaint in accordance

with the court’s ruling on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss dated May 27, 2005, be extended to 20

days after the above referenced Voluntary Dispute Resolution session is held on June 21, 2005,

the parties and their respective attorneys of record do stipulate, agree and request that the court

order that the time for defendants response, to said amended complaint, to be filed be extended to

30 days after service of the amended complaint.

LYLE D. SOLOMON

Dated: June 15, 2005 By: /s/ Lyle D. Solomon 

Lyle D. Solomon

Attorney for Plaintiff

BARKETT & GUMPERT

Dated: June 15, 2005 By: /s/ Franklin G. Gumpert 

 Franklin G. Gumpert

Attorney for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: June 16, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

Judge of the District Court

Case 2:05-cv-00079-FCD-KJM Document 16 Filed 06/16/05 Page 2 of 2