Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_83-cv-00711/USCOURTS-cand-3_83-cv-00711-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JOSEPH S. AMUNDSEN,

Defendant. /

No. C 83-00711 WHA

ORDER STRIKING

DEFENDANT’S ANSWER 

TO SEC REPLY

Pro se defendant Joseph Amundsen has filed an “answer to SEC reply to defendant’s

answer to find defendant in civil contempt” (Dkt. No. 28). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)

“once a reply is filed, no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior

Court approval” unless new evidence has been submitted in the reply brief or the party seeks to

file a statement of recent decision. Plaintiff filed its reply on November 22, 2011. The recent

filing by defendant appears to be a summary of defendant’s response brief and does not fall

within one of the exceptions under Rule 7-3(d). Defendant did not obtain prior approval to make

this filing. Thus, defendant’s answer to the SEC reply is STRICKEN.

Case 3:83-cv-00711-WHA Document 29 Filed 11/29/11 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

* * *

In the recent filing, defendant asks for the exact location of the hearing. The hearing will

be held in Courtroom 8, on the 19th Floor, U.S. District Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue,

San Francisco, CA 94102.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 29, 2011. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:83-cv-00711-WHA Document 29 Filed 11/29/11 Page 2 of 2