Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00475/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00475-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00475-TEH [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFTS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 

DONNA M. MELBY (SB# 86417)

donnamelby@paulhastings.com

JENNIFER S. BALDOCCHI (SB# 168945)

jenniferbaldocchi@paulhastings.com

JI HAE KIM (SB# 275020)

jihaekim@paulhastings.com

PAUL HASTINGS LLP

515 South Flower Street, Twenty-Fifth Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228

Telephone: 1(213) 683-6000

Facsimile: 1(213) 627-0705

GARY T. LAFAYETTE (SB# 088666)

glafayette@lkclaw.com

LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP

101 Mission Street, Suite 600

San Francisco, CA 94105-1738

Telephone: 1(415) 357-4600

Facsimile: 1(415) 357-4605

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.; 

AND CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD JOHN,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

UNITED AIR LINES, INC.;

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.; and

DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00475-TEH

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO 

RESPOND TO FIFTH AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AND REQUESTS RE 

SCHEDULING

Judge: Hon. Thelton E. Henderson

Complaint filed: May 29, 2012

FAC filed: July 20, 2012

SAC filed: November 30, 2012

TAC filed: May 20, 2013

Corrected TAC filed: June 21, 2013

4AC filed: Jan. 3, 2014

5AC filing deadline: Mar. 2, 2015

Case 3:15-cv-00475-VC Document 7 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00475-TEH -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFTS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

Having considered the papers and all pleadings on file and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Administrative Motion To Enlarge Time To 

Respond To Fifth Amended Complaint And Requests Re Scheduling is GRANTED. 

 Defendants shall have 45 days to respond to Plaintiff Richard John’s Fifth Amended 

Complaint, including but not limited to a motion to dismiss, strike, or transfer venue, 

or answer.

 The Case Management Conference (“CMC”) and all related deadlines shall be 

continued by at least 45 days, and shall occur on __________________________. If 

this date conflicts with the CMC in another case severed from Johnson et al. v. United 

Airlines et al., Case No. 12-cv-02730-MMC, counsel shall notify the Court, and the 

next available date shall be arranged.

 The CMC in this case shall be scheduled on the same day as the CMC in Miller v. 

United Airlines, Case No. 15-cv-00457.

 United Continental Holdings, Inc. shall not be listed as a defendant in the title or 

caption of any documents filed in this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: , 2015

THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Judge

06/22/2015, at 1:30 PM

03/03

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:15-cv-00475-VC Document 7 Filed 03/03/15 Page 2 of 2