Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05234/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05234-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RHONDA JACKSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

FRESNO POLICE OFFICER KENNAN )

RODEMS; FRESNO POLICE )

SERGEANT J. PAPALEO; CITY OF )

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, )

)

Defendants )

____________________________________)

CV F 02-5234 AWI SMS

AMENDMENT TO PRETRIAL

ORDER

Motions In Limine Hearing:

June 6, 2005

8:30 a.m., Courtroom 3

 

Trial: June 14, 2005

8:30 a.m., Courtroom 3

On April 4, 2005, the court filed a pretrial order in this case listing, inter alia, the

potential witnesses for the parties. Defendants have notified the court that a number of potential

witnesses were omitted from Defendants’ witness list on the order. After investigation, it is

apparent the reason for the omission is that the lists of potential witnesses contained in the

computer diskette copy of the parties’ joint pretrial statement omits the potential witnesses that

were listed on the electronically filed version of the same document. The parties are cautioned

that the computer diskette version of the joint pretrial statement is the source for the witness and

document lists used by the court in compiling its pretrial order. The court does not routinely

cross-check the diskette and electronically filed versions of the lists for accuracy or omissions.

Case 1:02-cv-05234-AWI -SMS Document 70 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Since Defendants have served the list of omitted potential witnesses on both the court and

on Plaintiff’s counsel, the court need not list the omitted names here individually. The omitted

names are HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into the existing pretrial statement,

Document 69, filed April 18, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05234-AWI -SMS Document 70 Filed 05/03/05 Page 2 of 2