Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00686/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00686-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS/ADR 

CERTIFICATION 

Rev 4/01 

1-PA/3544468.2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FRANKLIN BROCKWAY GOWDY, 

SBN 47918 

THOMAS D. KOHLER, SBN 207917 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

DAVID C. BOHRER, SBN 212397 

MICHAEL J. LYONS, SBN 202284 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

2 Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2212 

Tel: 650.843.4000 

Fax: 650.843.4001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

NIDEC CORPORATION 

MARTIN R. GLICK, SBN 40187 

SIMON J. FRANKEL, SBN 171552 

HOWARD RICK NEMEROVSKI CANADY 

FALK & RABKIN 

A Professional Corporation 

Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 

Tel: 415.434.1600 

Fax: 415.217.5910 

MORTON AMSTER (pro hac vice) 

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO (pro hac vice) 

CHARLES R. MACEDO (pro hac vice) 

AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP 

90 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10016 

Tel: 212.336.8000 

Fax: 212.336.8001 

Attorneys for Defendants 

AGILIS INC. (misidentified as “KABUSHIKI 

KAISHA AGILIS” in the Complaint), and 

AGILIS TECHNOLOGY INC. 

and Defendant and Counter-plaintiff 

Defendants VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, 

LTD., and JVC COMPONENTS (THAILAND) 

CO., LTD. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

NIDEC CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD., 

JVC COMPONENTS (THAILAND) CO., 

LTD., KABUSHIKI KAISHA AGILIS, and 

AGILIS TECHNOLOGY INC., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. C05 00686 WDB 

AMENDED STIPULATION AND 

ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS [ADR L.R. 3-5] 

ADR CERTIFICATION

(The Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process [ADR L.R. 3-5] was timely filed 

on May 25, 2005. This amendment is limited to substituting client signatures for Defendants.)

Case 4:05-cv-00686-WDB Document 24 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 5
 Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 26 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 5
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS/ADR 

CERTIFICATION 

Rev 4/01 

1-PA/3544468.2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process: 

 Court Processes:

 __ Arbitration __ ENE __ Mediation 

(Use space below to provide any information regarding timing of session, preferred subject 

matter expertise of neutral, or other issues.)

 Private Process:

 X Private ADR (please identify process and provider) 

The parties have agreed to private mediation and are in the process of negotiating a 

schedule and provider. 

 (For e-filers, please consult General Order No. 45, Section X regarding signatures.) 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: May 25, 2005 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 

 By: /s/ David C. Bohrer 

 David C. Bohrer 

Dated: May 25, 2005 HOWARD RICK NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & 

 RABKIN 

 

 By: /s/ Anthony F. Lo Cicero 

 Anthony F. Lo Cicero 

Dated: May 25, 2005 AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP 

 

 By: /s/ Anthony F. Lo Cicero 

 Anthony F. Lo Cicero 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: May 26, 2005

 /s/ 

 By: 

Wayne D. Brazil 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:05-cv-00686-WDB Document 24 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 2 of 5
 Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 26 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 5
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS/ADR 

CERTIFICATION 

Rev 4/01 

1-PA/3544468.2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL 

 Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 16 and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), each of the undersigned certifies that 

he or she has read either the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in the 

Northern District of California,” or the specified portions of the ADR Unit’s Internet site 

<www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov>, discussed the available dispute resolution options provided 

by the court and private entities, and considered whether this case might benefit from any 

of them.

 (Note: This Certification must be signed by each party and its counsel. For e-filers, 

please consult General Order No. 45, Section X regarding signatures.)

Dated: May 25, 2005 /s/ Hideaki Kitamura 

Hideaki Kitamura, for Plaintiff Nidec Corporation 

Dated: May 25, 2005 /s/ David C. Bohrer 

 David C. Bohrer, Counsel for Plaintiff Nidec Corporation 

Dated: May 25, 2005 /s/ Tetsuro Fuse 

Tetsuro Fuse, General Manager, for Defendant Victor 

Company of Japan, Ltd. 

Dated: May 25, 2005 /s/ Tetsuro Fuse 

Tetsuro Fuse, General Manager, for Defendant JVC 

Components (Thailand) Co., Ltd. 

Dated: May 25, 2005 /s/ Takuo Hatano 

Takuo Hatano, for Defendant Agilis Inc. 

Dated: May 25, 2005 /s/ Kevin Matsumoto 

Kevin Matsumoto, for Defendant Agilis Technology Inc.

Case 4:05-cv-00686-WDB Document 24 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 3 of 5
 Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 26 Filed 05/31/05 Page 3 of 5
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS/ADR 

CERTIFICATION 

Rev 4/01 

1-PA/3544468.2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: May 25, 2005 /s/ Anthony F. Lo Cicero 

Anthony F. Lo Cicero, Counsel for Defendants Victor 

Company of Japan, Ltd., JVC Components (Thailand) Co., 

Ltd., Agilis Inc., and Agilis Technology Inc. 

Case 4:05-cv-00686-WDB Document 24 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 4 of 5
 Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 26 Filed 05/31/05 Page 4 of 5
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS/ADR 

CERTIFICATION 

Rev 4/01 

1-PA/3544468.2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I, David C. Bohrer, 

attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 

signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 

that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 26th day of May, 2005, at Palo Alto. 

 /s/ David C. Bohrer 

 David C. Bohrer 

NOTE: You also must concurrently submit a copy of any ADR Forms filed to the ADR Unit by 

fax (415-522-4112), hand delivery (ADR Program, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, Room 

16-6892, San Francisco, CA) or as a PDF attachment by email to adr@cand.uscourts.gov.

Case 4:05-cv-00686-WDB Document 24 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 5 of 5
 Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 26 Filed 05/31/05 Page 5 of 5