Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01773/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01773-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

HOGAN LOVELLS US

LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

\\LA - 086335/000488 - 1266048 v1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

Michael M. Maddigan (Bar No. 163450) 

1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Telephone: (310) 785-4600 

Facsimile: (310) 785-4601 

michael.maddigan@hoganlovells.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES – SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware 

Corporation doing business as Shasta 

Regional Medical Center, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, 

INC., a Minnesota Corporation licensed 

to do business in California, and DOES 

1 through 100, Inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:16-cv-01773-KJM-CKD

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO RESPOND TO INITIAL 

COMPLAINT AND ORDER 

THEREON 

(E.D. L.R. 144(A)) 

Complaint served: June 15, 2016 

Action Removed: July 28, 2016 

Current Response Date: September 1, 

2016 

New Response Date: September 7, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-01773-KJM-CKD Document 8 Filed 09/02/16 Page 1 of 4
HOGAN LOVELLS US

LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

- 1 - STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

\\LA - 086335/000488 - 1266048 v1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

This Stipulation is entered into with respect to the following facts: 

1. Whereas Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services – Shasta, LLC 

(“Plaintiff”) initially filed this action in the Superior Court for the County of Shasta, 

Case Number 185047, on June 15, 2016; 

2. Whereas Defendant United Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Defendant”) 

removed the underlying state court action to this Court on July 28, 2016; 

3. Whereas, pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties previously 

stipulated that Defendant would have until September 1, 2016 to file its response to 

the initial complaint; 

4. Whereas, due to unanticipated personal and professional matters, and 

the upcoming Labor Day holiday, Defendant’s counsel has requested a brief 

extension – until September 7, 2016 – to file its response to the initial complaint; 

5. Whereas, Plaintiff has agreed to grant Defendant this short extension 

of time; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys of 

record for Plaintiff and Defendant that: 

Defendant’s answer or response to the Complaint is now due on or before 

September 7, 2016. 

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: August 31, 2016 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

MICHAEL M. MADDIGAN 

By: /s/ Michael M. Maddigan 

Michael M. Maddigan 

Attorney for Defendant 

UNITED HEALTHCARE 

SERVICES, INC. 

Case 2:16-cv-01773-KJM-CKD Document 8 Filed 09/02/16 Page 2 of 4
HOGAN LOVELLS US

LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

- 2 - STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

\\LA - 086335/000488 - 1266048 v1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: August 31, 2016 TROY A. SHELL 

BRIAN WONG 

SEPAND AKHAVANHAIDARY 

JOHN NUELLE 

OLIVER TOMAS 

By: /s/ Sepand Akhavanhaidary 

Sepand Akhavanhaidary 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Prime 

Healthcare Services – Shasta, LLC 

Case 2:16-cv-01773-KJM-CKD Document 8 Filed 09/02/16 Page 3 of 4
HOGAN LOVELLS US

LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

- 1 - ORDER

\\LA - 086335/000488 - 1266048 v1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER 

The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulation to extend Defendant’s 

deadline to respond to the complaint, and it appears that there is good cause to 

GRANT the requested relief. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that: 

1. Defendant’s response to the complaint shall be due on or before 

September 7, 2016. 

Dated: September 1, 2016 

Case 2:16-cv-01773-KJM-CKD Document 8 Filed 09/02/16 Page 4 of 4