Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05952/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05952-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1121 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

QUICKEN LOANS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

PLAN B FUNDING INC. ET AL.,

Defendant. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C- 06-5952 PVT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE,

BASED ON PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO APPEAR FOR CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

On September 26, 2006, Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action and a Case

Management Conference was set for January 9, 2007. On October 16, 2007, the Court granted

leave to conduct early discovery in order for Plaintiff to identify the proper defendants. On

January 8, 2007, Plaintiff successfully sought to continue the Case Management Conference and

to conduct additional discovery. The Case Management Conference was continued to March 9,

2007. On March 8, 2007, Plaintiff again successfully sought to continue the Case Management

Conference. On May 15, 2007, the Court held an initial Case Management Conference, setting a 

further Case Management Conference for July 24 ,2007 in order to give Plaintiff time to serve

the amended complaint. On July 20, 2007, Plaintiff again sought a continuance. On July 23,

2007, the Court granted another application to continue the Case Management Conference and

set the new conference for August 21, 2007. On August 17, 2007, the Plaintiff again sought a

continuance. On August 20, 2007, the Court granted the continuance, setting the Case

Management Conference for October 9, 2007 and specifically ordering that “Any Further

Case 5:06-cv-05952-PVT Document 21 Filed 10/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

requests for continuances must be received by the Court 7 days before the proposed Case

Management Conference.” 

As of October 2, 2007, the Court had not received either a request to continue the Case

Management Conference or a Case Management Conference Statement. On October 9, 2007,

the Court called the Case Management Conference, but Plaintiff did not appear.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than October 30, 2007, Plaintiff shall file a

declaration stating why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute based on

Plaintiff’s inability to find and serve Defendants and Plaintiff’s failure to appear at the Case

Management Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 16, 2007

____________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:06-cv-05952-PVT Document 21 Filed 10/16/07 Page 2 of 2