Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01688/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01688-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERL KEITH KAPFS BROWN

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1688 MCE CMK PS

vs.

SHASTA COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

 / ORDER

On May 12, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment and set it for

hearing on June 14, 2005. However, on May 10, 2005, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint

with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Accordingly, there is no valid

complaint to form a basis for a motion for summary judgment. 

As this is entirely a procedural issue, the court vacates the June 14, 2005, hearing date

and dismisses plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment by order without prejudice. 

///

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01688-MCE -CMK Document 15 Filed 05/17/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The June 14, 2005 hearing date is vacated and;

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is dismissed without prejudice by

order. 

DATED: May 16, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01688-MCE -CMK Document 15 Filed 05/17/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:04-cv-01688-MCE -CMK Document 15 Filed 05/17/05 Page 3 of 3