Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02467/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02467-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Scott Johnson,

Plaintiff,

v.

Redwood Barn Nursery, Inc., a 

California Corporation; and 

Does 1-10,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-02467-GEB-CKD

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

TO DISMISS

Defendant moves for dismissal of the federal question 

in Plaintiff’s Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3). Specifically, Defendant argues since 

subject matter jurisdiction is premised on Plaintiff’s three 

injunctive relief claims that are alleged under Title III of the 

Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), these claims should be 

dismissed because they are now moot. (Mot. to Dismiss, 5:26-6:3, 

ECF No. 4.) Further, Defendant argues that following this 

requested dismissal, the Court should decline to exercise

supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s remaining state law 

claims, and those claim should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 

1367(c)(3). (Id. 6:13-26.)

However, the conclusory assertions in Defendant’s 

opening brief fail to show that one of Plaintiff’s ADA claims is 

moot. Therefore, the motion is denied

Dated: February 18, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-02467-GEB-CKD Document 14 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 1