Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-02373/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-02373-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP EXTENDING DEFS’ TIME TO RESPOND 

TO THE COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C-05-02373-CRB

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOUGLAS J. CLARK, State Bar No. 171499 

(dclark@wsgr.com) 

IGNACIO E. SALCEDA, State Bar No. 164017 

(isalceda@wsgr.com) 

KYLE A. WOMBOLT, State Bar No. 224603 

(kwombolt@wsgr.com) 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES J. GUZZETTI, Individually and 

on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs.

TIBCO SOFTWARE, INC., VIVEK Y. 

RANADIVE, CHRISTOPHER G. O’MEARA, 

SYDNEY CAREY and RAJESH U. 

MASHRUWALA,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C-05-02373 CRB 

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO MOVE OR 

OTHERWISE RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff and Defendants Tibco Software, Inc. Vivek Y. 

Ranadive, Christopher G. O’Meara, Sydney Carey and Rajesh U. Mashruwala, by and through 

their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

 1. Unless the parties agree or the Court orders otherwise, the time within which the 

Defendants may answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint is hereby extended 

until after the Court has selected a Lead Plaintiff or Plaintiffs and resolved the issue of which law 

firm(s) or attorney(s) will be acting as Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel in this matter. 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP EXTENDING DEFS’ TIME TO RESPOND 

TO THE COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C-05-02373-CRB

-2-

 2. After the Court designates Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel, counsel for Defendants and 

Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel shall confer and agree on a schedule for answering, moving or 

otherwise responding to Plaintiff’s complaint. The parties agree that such schedule will be 

memorialized in a stipulation and proposed order to be filed with the court. 

Dated: June 30, 2005 SCOTT + SCOTT, LLC 

 By: /s/ Arthur L. Shingler III 

Arthur L. Shingler III 

 Counsel for Plaintiff James J. Guzzetti 

Dated: June 30, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

 By: /s/ Ignacio E. Salceda 

 Ignacio E. Salceda 

Counsel for Defendants Tibco Software, Inc., Vivek 

Y. Ranadive, Christopher G. O’Meara, Sydney 

Carey and Rajesh Mashruwala 

 

 I, Ignacio E. Salceda, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file this Stipulation Extending Defendants’ Time to Move or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s 

Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Arthur L. Shingler III 

has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: June 30, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Ignacio E. Salceda 

 Ignacio E. Salceda 

Counsel for Defendants Tibco Software, Inc., 

Vivek Y. Ranadive, Christopher G. O’Meara, 

Sydney Carey and Rajesh Mashruwala 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer