Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00588/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00588-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TARJHONAIRO KENDRICKS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0588 RRB EFB P

vs.

JEANNE S. WOODFORD,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On

March 7, 2007, the court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss with 30 days to file an amended

petition containing only exhausted claims. The court warned petitioner that failure to comply

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. On May 3, 2007, the court gave

petitioner an additional 30 days to file an amended petition. The 30-day period has expired and

petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

Case 2:06-cv-00588-JKS-EFB Document 33 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 27, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00588-JKS-EFB Document 33 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 2