Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00388/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00388-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD JEROME FISHER, )

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

PAUL M. SCHULTZ, Warden, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

)

No. CV-F-05-388 REC/TAG HC 

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2241

AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT 

On June 27, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge

recommended that the court dismiss petitioner’s petition for writ

of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

On July 19, 2005, petitioner timely filed objections to the

recommendation.

The court has reviewed the record herein de novo and concurs

in the recommendation. Petitioner has attempted several times to

raise this claim for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and been

denied that the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeal for the

Case 1:05-cv-00388-REC-TAG Document 9 Filed 08/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Fifth Circuit. The court also notes that petitioner filed a

petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the United States

District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, the

dismissal of which was affirmed by the Fifth Circuit. See Fisher

v. Casterlane, 54 Fed.Appx. 797 (5th Cir. 2002). Therefore,

petitioner is precluded by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a) from proceeding

with the same claim in this court. 

ACCORDINGLY:

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241 is dismissed.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for

respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 29, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00388-REC-TAG Document 9 Filed 08/01/05 Page 2 of 2