Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01977/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01977-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIE PAUL VIGIL,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES YATES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:10-cv-01977-LJO-SAB-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF No.35)

ORDER THAT THIS ACTION PROCEED 

ON THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AGAINST DEFENDANT VALENCIA FOR 

EXCESSIVE FORCE

ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING 

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On March 18, 2016, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that this 

action proceed on the third amended complaint against Defendant Valencia on Plaintiff’s claim 

of excessive force, and that the remaining claims and Defendants be dismissed.Plaintiff was 

provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 

the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this 

Case 1:10-cv-01977-LJO-SAB Document 36 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the record to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 18, 

2016, are adopted in full;

2. This action proceeds on the third amended complaint against Defendant C/O 

Valencia on Plaintiff’s claim of excessive force.

3. Defendants Yates, Diez, Espino, King, O’Brien, Howard, Solo, Das, and Brown 

are dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim against them;

4. Plaintiff’s medical care claim is dismissed for failure to state a claim; and

5. This action is referred to the Magistrate Judge for service of process of the third 

amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01977-LJO-SAB Document 36 Filed 04/26/16 Page 2 of 2