Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00044/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00044-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SVI-47779v3 STIPULATION RE: MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. C06-00044 JW 

ATTORNEYS LISTED ON LAST PAGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ZOLTAR SATELLITE ALARM SYSTEMS, 

INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LG ELECTRONICS MOBILE 

COMMUNICATIONS CO., ET AL, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 06-00044 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF 

SCHEDULE 

As discussed at the June 11, 2007 Case Management Conference, in view of the late 

addition of the Samsung entities to the case, Plaintiff Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. 

(“Zoltar”), and Defendants Motorola, Inc., Sprint Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 

and Samsung Telecommunictions America LP (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their 

respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to modify the current schedule, and request that the 

Court adopt the following schedule: 

DATE EVENT 

June 21, 2007 P.R. 3-1 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and 

Infringement Contentions and P.R. 3-2 

document production to be served 

July 2, 2007 P.R. 3-3 Preliminary Invalidity Contentions 

and P.R. 3-4 document production to be served

July 16, 2007 Parties to exchange proposed terms and claim 

elements for construction (P.R. 4-1) 

July 21, 2007 Parties to exchange preliminary proposed 

claim construction and extrinsic evidence 

supporting same (P.R. 4-2) 

Case 5:06-cv-00044-JW Document 185 Filed 06/19/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SVI-47779v3 - 2 - STIPULATION RE: MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 5:06 CV 00044 JW 

DATE EVENT 

July 23, 2007 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing 

Statement to be filed (P.R. 4-3) 

July 27, 2007 Completion date for discovery on claim 

construction (P.R. 4-4) 

August 2, 2007 Opening claim construction brief (P.R. 4-5(a)) 

August 23, 2007 Responsive claim construction brief (P.R. 4-

5(b)) 

September 6, 2007 Reply claim construction brief (P.R. 4-5(c)) 

September 21, 2007 Claim Construction Hearing 

Zoltar and Defendants jointly request that the Court issue its Order based on the foregoing 

stipulation. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Case 5:06-cv-00044-JW Document 185 Filed 06/19/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SVI-47779v3 - 3 - STIPULATION RE: MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 5:06 CV 00044 JW 

Dated: June 15, 2007 JONES DAY 

By: /s/ Tharan Gregory Lanier 

 Tharan Gregory Lanier 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Motorola, Inc. 

Dated: June 15, 2007 ROUSE HENDRICKS GERMAN MAY PC 

By: /s/ Lawrence A. Rouse* 

 Lawrence A. Rouse 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Sprint Corporation 

Dated: June 15, 2007 HELLER ERHMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Robert T. Haslam* 

 Robert T. Haslam 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung 

Telecommunications America LP 

Dated: June 15, 2007 GIRARDI & KEESE 

By: /s/ Howard B. Miller* 

 Howard B. Miller 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. 

* Signed by permission 

Case 5:06-cv-00044-JW Document 185 Filed 06/19/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SVI-47779v3 - 4 - STIPULATION RE: MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 5:06 CV 00044 JW 

ORDER

The foregoing stipulation between Plaintiff Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. 

(“Zoltar”), and Defendants Motorola, Inc., Sprint Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 

and Samsung Telecommunications America LP (collectively, “Defendants”) for an order 

modifying the schedule of disclosures under the Patent Local Rules, duly considered, AND 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

Parties shall adhere to the modified schedule for disclosures, as disclosed above. 

DATED: __________________ _____________________________ 

 THE HON. JUDGE WARE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

June 19 2007

Case 5:06-cv-00044-JW Document 185 Filed 06/19/07 Page 4 of 4