Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00902/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00902-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GURVINDER GHUMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., 

Defendants.

_____________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1: 12-cv-00902-AWI-BAM

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On February 13, 2013, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint with

leave to amend. (Doc. 27.) On March 17, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Amend their

Complaint. (Doc. 28.) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend, however, was not a motion, but rather, a

Second Amended Complaint. Id. On March 22, 2013, the Clerk’s Office issued a notice to

Plaintiffs’ counsel, informing her that Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint was improperly

filed. Plaintiffs were requested to refile the Second Amended Complaint properly. As of the

date of this Order, Plaintiffs have failed to address the Clerk’s notice and refile their Second

Amended Complaint. Moreover, Plaintiffs have been unreachable to discuss this concern. 

1

Case 1:12-cv-00902-AWI-BAM Document 32 Filed 04/10/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any, why this Court should not strike

Docket Number 28 (Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint, erroneously filed as a Motion to

Amend Complaint) for Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the Clerk’s Office’s request. Plaintiffs

shall respond in writing no later than April 15, 2013, at 9:00 AM. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 10, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

10c20k UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:12-cv-00902-AWI-BAM Document 32 Filed 04/10/13 Page 2 of 2