Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04265/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04265-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C-04-4265 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On August 5, 2005, defendant electronically filed a reply to its motion for summary

judgment and an associated declaration. Defendant has violated General Order 45 and the

Court’s standing orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than

noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one

paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and

. . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not

File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to

The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of the above-referenced

documents. The parties are hereby advised that if either party fails in the future to comply

with the Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Case 3:04-cv-04265-MMC Document 62 Filed 08/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court may impose sanctions on the noncomplying party, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 10, 2005 MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-04265-MMC Document 62 Filed 08/10/05 Page 2 of 2