Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00644/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00644-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORIO TEJADA, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CON-AGRA FOODS, INC., a business )

entity, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, )

)

Defendant. )

)

____________________________________)

1:06-CV-644 AWI DLB

ORDER RE-OPENING CASE,

ORDER FOR THE PARTIES

TO REPORT TO THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE, and

ORDER ADDING COUNSEL

TO DOCKET

On June 4, 2008, this Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant on all

claims. See Court’s Docket Doc. No. 46. On November 24, 2009, the Ninth Circuit affirmed in

part and reversed in part that order. See id. at Doc. No. 63. The Ninth Circuit reversed only the

grant of summary judgment with respect to Tejada’s accommodation claim under California

Government Code § 12940(m). See id. On December 16, 2009, the Ninth Circuit issued its

mandate. See id. at Doc. No. 64. Since mandate has now issued, this case must proceed. 

Additionally, on October 16, 2009, Plaintiff filed an association of counsel. See id. at

Doc. No. 62. However, the associated counsel has not been added to the docket. The clerk will

be directed to add Mr. Eric P. Escamilla as an attorney for Plaintiff so that Mr. Escamilla may be

served with all pertinent papers.

Case 1:06-cv-00644-AWI-DLB Document 65 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk shall re-open this case; 

2. The Clerk is directed to add attorney Eric P. Esamilla (see Court’s Docket Document No.

62) to the docket as a counsel for Plaintiff;

3. The parties are to contact the Magistrate Judge within twenty (20) days of service of this

order for the purpose of setting a pre-trail conference date, a trial date, and (if the parties

believe it would be productive) a settlement conference date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 7, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00644-AWI-DLB Document 65 Filed 01/08/10 Page 2 of 2