Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_11-cv-08030/USCOURTS-azd-3_11-cv-08030-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Tom Bean, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v.

Pearson Education, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CV 11-8030-PCT-PGR

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Further

Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. (Doc. 142.) Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs’

reply contains new arguments and inaccurate information. (Id.) Plaintiffs’ oppose the motion,

arguing that the proposed surreply repeats Defendant’s previous arguments and discusses

documents produced since Plaintiffs filed their motion to compel. (Doc. 144 at 2.)

The local rules make no provision for the filing of surreplies, see LRCiv 7.2, and the

Court finds that the discovery issues pending before it have been adequately briefed. The

Court notes that it will not consider any issues or evidence identified for the first time in

Plaintiffs’ reply brief. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Surreply (Doc. 142).

DATED this 18th day of July, 2012.

Case 3:11-cv-08030-PGR Document 150 Filed 07/18/12 Page 1 of 1