Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01299/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01299-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Lailaa Iqbal, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Antony J. Blinken, et al., 

Defendants. 

___________________________________ 

Zaid Khan, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Antony J. Blinken, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:23-cv-01299-KJM-KJN 

No. 2:23-cv-02814-CKD 

ORDER 

The court has reviewed defendants’ notice of related cases, ECF No. 27 (Iqbal, Case 

No. 23-1299); ECF No. 7 (Khan, Case No. 23-2814). The court finds the above-captioned 

actions are not related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a) and declines to take any further 

action. Khan, Case No. 23-2814 shall remain pending before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. 

Delaney. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 5, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-01299-KJM-CSK Document 30 Filed 01/05/24 Page 1 of 1