Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01658/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01658-69/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE CORPORATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SAP AG, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C-07-01658 PJH (EDL)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL

On March 2, 2010, following the parties’ joint status report regarding Plaintiff’s Motion to

Compel and to Modify the Protective Order, the parties filed a joint letter requesting to file

additional briefing regarding the sufficiency of Defendants’ amended responses to Plaintiff’s

requests for admission. The Court will allow Plaintiff to file a supplemental brief of no more than

10 pages on the limited issue of Defendants’ amended responses to its requests for admission by no

later than March 5, 2010. Defendant may file an opposition of no more than 10 pages by March 12,

2010, and Plaintiff may file a reply of no more than 5 pages by March 17, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2009 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document 638 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 1