Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_16-cv-03260/USCOURTS-azd-2_16-cv-03260-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Arek Fressadi, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Kathryn Ann Glover, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-16-03260-PHX-DJH 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff has filed an “Motion for Extension of Time on Scheduling Order Due to 

Extraordinary Circumstances” (Doc. 288) in which Plaintiff seeks extensions of the case 

management deadlines in the Court’s Scheduling Order (Doc. 280). Plaintiff does not 

indicate whether the remaining Defendants are amenable to or opposed to his requests, and 

indeed, does not indicate that any good faith attempt was made to discuss his proposed 

extensions with opposing counsel prior to filing his motion. Local Rule 7.3 states that a 

party moving for an extension of time “must state the position of each other party. If the 

moving party’s efforts to determine the position of any other party are unsuccessful, a 

statement to that effect must be included in the motion or stipulation.” LRCiv. 7.3(b) 

(emphasis added). The Court, accordingly, will deny the motion as premature. Plaintiff 

must discuss his requested extensions with opposing counsel prior to seeking judicial 

intervention in the matter. Accordingly, 

... 

... 

Case 2:16-cv-03260-DJH Document 289 Filed 02/11/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS ORDERED denying without prejudice Plaintiff’s premature “Motion for 

Extension of Time on Scheduling Order Due to Extraordinary Circumstances.” (Doc. 288). 

 Dated this 11th day of February, 2019. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa 

United States District Judge 

 

Case 2:16-cv-03260-DJH Document 289 Filed 02/11/19 Page 2 of 2