Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01779/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01779-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

343405

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RASHIDA ASKLEY; CLEVELAND VALDRY, 

JR.,

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

OAKLAND POLICE OFFICERS T. PENA 

NO. 8227T; J. CHANG, NO. 8005P;

S. THURSTON NO. 7674T; R. RACE

NO. 7715T; W. WALLACE NO. 7215T; SGT. 

YOUNG NO. 7640P; SGT. A. BANKS; CITY 

OF OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; 

CITY OF OAKLAND; DOES 1 THROUGH 

50;

 Defendants. 

Case No. C-04-1779-JSW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE DISPOSITIVE MOTION 

HEARING

WHEREAS the parties hereto attended a mediation on June 7, 2005 

conducted by Magistrate Judge Edward Chen; and 

WHEREAS a tentative settlement was reached, subject to Oakland City 

Council approval; and 

WHEREAS the Oakland City Council is expected to review and consider 

approval of said settlement by July 19, 2005; and 

WHEREAS defendants intend to file a motion pursuant to Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, Rule 56, or other dispositive motion if the settlement is not approved; and 

WHEREAS the last day for dispositive motions to be heard is currently July 

29, 2005, with filing and service of the motion to be made by June 24, 2005; and 

WHEREAS to avoid unnecessary use of Court resources and the incurrence 

of attorneys’ fees for all parties, the parties hereby request that the dispositive motion 

Case 3:04-cv-01779-JSW Document 38 Filed 06/10/2005 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:04-cv-01779-JSW Document 39 Filed 06/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 C-04-1779-JSW 

RE DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING 

cutoff date be continued to allow for filing and serving the motion after the Oakland City 

Council consideration date of July 19, 2005; THEREFOR 

THE PARTIES HERETO STIPULATE AND REQUESTAS FOLLOWS: 

1) The deadline for dispositive motions to be heard is extended 

until August 26, 2005 at 9:00 a.m.; 

2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary 

Judgment is reserved for hearing on August 26, 2005 at 9:00 

a.m. and the reservation for July 29, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. is 

vacated.

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

DATED: June 10, 2005 

 //s//WALTER RILEY_ WALTER RILEY, ESQ 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 Rashida Askley and Cleveland Valdry, Jr. 

DATED: June 10, 2005 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 

 //s//PELAYO A. LLAMAS, JR._________

 PELAYO A. LLAMAS, JR. 

Deputy City Attorney 

Attorney for Defendants 

 City of Oakland, et al. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________

 

 ___________________________________ 

 JEFFREY S. WHITE 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:04-cv-01779-JSW Document 38 Filed 06/10/2005 Page 2 of 2

June 10, 2005

/s/ Jeffrey S. White

Case 3:04-cv-01779-JSW Document 39 Filed 06/10/05 Page 2 of 2