Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01083/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01083-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

BURKE, WILLIAMS &

SORENSEN, LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

LOS A NG EL ES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA #4812-3035-6515 v1 - 1 -

1:11-CV-01083-AWI-GSA

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CLAIMS OF 

B.R. AND 14TH AMENDMENT CLAIMS

JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 66879)

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

Airport Corporate Center

7677 Oakport St., Suite 1120

Oakland, CA 94621

Telephone: (510) 839-5200

Facsimile: (510) 839-3882

Email: john.burris@johnburrislaw.com

STEVEN R. YOURKE, ESQ. (State Bar No. 118506)

LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN YOURKE

1048 Larkin Street, No. 11

San Francisco, CA 94109

(415) 424-0022

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Susan E. Coleman (SBN 171832)

E-mail: scoleman@bwslaw.com

Nathan A. Oyster (SBN 225307)

E-mail: noyster@bwslaw.com

BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP

444 South Flower Street, Suite 2400

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2953

Tel: 213.236.0600Fax: 213.236.2700

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF 

MODESTO and OFFICER RON ZIYA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN REED, B.R., a minor, by her 

guardian ad litem, Roxanne Sayer,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal 

corporation, Chief of Police 

HARDEN, in his individual capacity; 

Police Officer RON ZIYA, Police 

Officer CAELI KOEHLER, in their 

individual and official capacities,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:11-cv-01083-AWI-GSA

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

DISMISS CLAIMS OF B.R. AND 

FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS

Trial Date: April 28, 2015

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Courtroom: 2

Hon. Anthony W. Ishii 

Case 1:11-cv-01083-AWI-GSA Document 178 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 3
BURKE, WILLIAMS &

SORENSEN, LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

LOS A NG EL ES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA #4812-3035-6515 v1 - 2 -

1:11-CV-01083-AWI-GSA

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CLAIMS OF 

B.R. AND 14TH AMENDMENT CLAIMS

Plaintiffs BRIAN REED and B.R., through her guardian ad litem, 

ROXANNE SAYER (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants CITY OF 

MODESTO and OFFICER RON ZIYA (hereinafter “Defendants”) hereby stipulate 

to the following:

1. All claims of B.R., through her guardian ad litem, ROXANNE 

SAYER, are to be dismissed with prejudice. 

2. The second claim for relief, which alleges a violation of the Fourteenth 

Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, is to be dismissed with prejudice.

3. Each side is to bear their own costs and fees as to the dismissal 

identified in paragraphs 1 and 2.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 23, 2015 Law Office of John Burris

Law Office of Steven Yourke

By: /s/ 

 [As authorized on 

John L. Burris

Steven R. Yourke

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: April 23, 2015 Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP

By: /s/ Nathan A. Oyster

Susan E. Coleman

Nathan A. Oyster

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF MODESTO and OFFICER 

RON ZIYA

///

///

///

///

Case 1:11-cv-01083-AWI-GSA Document 178 Filed 04/24/15 Page 2 of 3
BURKE, WILLIAMS &

SORENSEN, LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

LOS A NG EL ES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA #4812-3035-6515 v1 - 3 -

1:11-CV-01083-AWI-GSA

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CLAIMS OF 

B.R. AND 14TH AMENDMENT CLAIMS

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS OF B.R. AND FOURTEENTH 

AMENDMENT CLAIMS

Having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss Claims of B.R. and 

Fourteenth Amendment Claims, filed on April 23, 2015, and finding good cause 

therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. All claims of B.R., through her guardian ad litem, ROXANNE 

SAYER, are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

2. The second claim for relief, which alleges a violation of the Fourteenth 

Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, is hereby dismissed with 

prejudice.

3. Each side is to bear their own costs and fees as to the dismissal 

identified in paragraphs 1 and 2.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 24, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01083-AWI-GSA Document 178 Filed 04/24/15 Page 3 of 3