Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00589/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00589-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBIN GILLEN STARR, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, et al., 

Respondents. 

No. 2:16-cv-0589 AC P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By an order filed October 6, 2016, petitioner was ordered to file a completed in forma 

pauperis affidavit and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that 

this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded 

to the court’s order and has not filed the required document. 

In addition to failing to comply with the court’s October 6, 2016 order, petitioner has 

refused multiple mailings from the court. The October 6, 2016 order was served on petitioner’s 

address of record and returned by the postal service with the notation that delivery had been 

refused. The order was re-served on petitioner’s address of record on October 26, 2016 and has 

not been returned. Petitioner is informed that refusal of court orders does not obviate his 

responsibility to prosecute this action and comply with court orders. 

 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 

Case 2:16-cv-00589-MCE-AC Document 15 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty one days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Petitioner is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: November 15, 2016 

 

Case 2:16-cv-00589-MCE-AC Document 15 Filed 11/16/16 Page 2 of 2