Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02672/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02672-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

M. DOE et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 04-02672 CRB

ORDER

On November 18, 2005, the Court held oral argument on some of the defendants’

motion for summary judgment. In open court, the Court granted plaintiffs’ counsel leave to

conduct further discovery pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f) to determine

precisely what kind of authority the director of the Center possessed during the relevant time

period of this lawsuit. Plaintiffs may submit a supplemental brief on this issue on or before

December 23, 2005. Defendants may file a reply to that brief on or before January 6, 2006. 

The Court will advise the parties if further oral argument is necessary. 

//

//

//

//

Case 3:04-cv-02672-CRB Document 55 Filed 11/21/05 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2004\2672\order re rule 56(f) discovery.wpd 2

 The January 9, 2006 trial date is hereby vacated. The Court will schedule a case

management conference to set a new trial date after its ruling on this motion, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 21, 2005

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-02672-CRB Document 55 Filed 11/21/05 Page 2 of 2