Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00915/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00915-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELMER EUGENE WALKER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0915 FCD KJM P

vs.

WARDEN CAMPBELL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On January 4, 2007, plaintiff filed an “opposition” to an order entered by the

magistrate judge on December 20, 2006 dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with leave to file and

amended complaint. The court construes the “opposition” as a request for reconsideration. 

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does

not appear that the magistrate judge’s December 20, 2006 ruling was clearly erroneous or

contrary to law.

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00915-FCD-KJM Document 14 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed December 20, 2006 dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with leave to

amend, is affirmed. 

DATED: January 19, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00915-FCD-KJM Document 14 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 2