Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00979/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00979-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

CASE SCHEDULE 

 Case No.: C 10-0979 JSW (PR) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DEANNA L. KWONG (SBN 233480) 

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Tel. (650) 632-4700 

Fax (650) 632-4800 

dkwong@cov.com 

RYAN M. BUSCHELL (SBN 271509) 

TESS A. HAMILTON (SBN 279738) 

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

One Front Street, 35th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Tel. (415) 591-6000 

Fax. (415) 591-6091 

rbuschell@cov.com 

tahamilton@cov.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

REYNALDO AYALA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

REYNALDO AYALA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ROBERT AYERS, JR., et al., 

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: C 10-0979 JSW (PR) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING CASE 

SCHEDULE 

 

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey White 

Place: Courtroom 11, 19th floor

Case 3:10-cv-00979-JSW Document 140 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 4 Case3:10-cv-00979-JSW Document132 Filed12/17/12 Page1 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

CASE SCHEDULE 

 Case No.: C 10-0979 JSW (PR) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The parties, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), respectfully submit the following 

stipulation: 

1. Plaintiff, Mr. Reynaldo Ayala, filed his Third Amended Complaint 

(“Complaint”) on October 19, 2012, and the Complaint was deemed operative by the Court on 

November 16, 2012, in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San 

Francisco Division. Dkt. 103. 

2. In granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and to 

Amend Pretrial Schedule on November 16, 2012, the Court entered the current scheduling order 

which contemplates, among other things, the completion of non-expert discovery by December 

31, 2012. 

3. Because it is not possible to complete certain third-party inmate 

depositions prior to December 31, 2012, the parties have agreed to modify the current case 

schedule. The parties brought the fact of their agreement to the Court’s attention during the 

Case Management Conference held on December 14, 2012, and the Court ordered the parties to 

submit a suitable stipulation. This Stipulation and Proposed Order serves that purpose. 

4. Specifically, given the need to extend non-expert discovery for the 

limited purpose of completing the third-party inmate depositions, the parties have agreed to 

modify the current schedule, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows: 

Prior Deadline New Deadline 

Close of Non-Expert Discovery 12/31/2012 12/31/2012* 

* Completion of third-party 

inmate depositions (subject to 

cooperation of their counsel). 

* All other non-expert discovery 

shall remain due on 12/31/2012. 

* Should Defendants discover 

new issues from the third-party 

inmate depositions, Defendants 

reserve the right to seek a 

continuance of fact discovery to 

-- 1/16/2013 

Case 3:10-cv-00979-JSW Document 140 Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 4 Case3:10-cv-00979-JSW Document132 Filed12/17/12 Page2 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

CASE SCHEDULE 

2 Case No.: C 10-0979 JSW (PR) 

Place: Courtroom 11, 19th floor 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Prior Deadline New Deadline 

investigate the new issues. 

Plaintiff reserves the right to 

oppose any such request. 

Designate Expert Witnesses/Serve 

Opening Expert Reports 1/9/2013 1/23/2013 (12:00 PM PDT) 

Serve Rebuttal Expert Reports 1/18/2013 2/4/2013 

Last Day for Expert Discovery 1/31/2013 2/13/2013 

Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions 3/22/2013 3/22/2013 

(9:00 AM) 

Pretrial Conference 5/20/2013 5/20/2013 

(2:00 PM) 

Jury Trial Date (5 days) 6/10/2013 6/10/2013 

(8:00 AM) 

5. As shown, the parties propose to modify only certain deadlines related to 

non-expert and expert discovery; all other deadlines set by the Court’s November 16, 2012 

Order remain in place. 

6. Finally, this Stipulation has been promptly filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 5. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: December 17, 2012 By: /s/ Deanna Kwong 

Deanna L. Kwong 

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Reynaldo Ayala 

Dated: December 17, 2012 By: _/s/ Giam Nguyen 

Giam M. Nguyen 

 Deputy Attorney General 

 Attorney for Defendants Wagner, Schlosser, 

Hansen, Guthrie, and Faaita 

Dated: December 17, 2012 By: _/s/ Christian Green 

Christian B. Green 

Law Offices of Samuel L. Grader 

Attorney for Defendant Edmonds

Case 3:10-cv-00979-JSW Document 140 Filed 01/02/13 Page 3 of 4 Case3:10-cv-00979-JSW Document132 Filed12/17/12 Page3 of 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

CASE SCHEDULE 

3 Case No.: C 10-0979 JSW (PR) 

Place: Courtroom 11, 19th floor 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ATTESTATION: Pursuant to L.R. 5-1, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from all signatories. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: By: 

JEFFREY S. WHITE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case3:10-cv-00979-JSW Document132 Filed12/17/12 Page4 of 5

January 2, 2013

Case 3:10-cv-00979-JSW Document 140 Filed 01/02/13 Page 4 of 4