Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_06-cv-01679/USCOURTS-azd-3_06-cv-01679-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joe L. Barela,

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al., 

 Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-1679-PCT-MHM

ORDER

Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

on July 5, 2006, claiming his sentence imposed was in violation of his constitutional rights.

On November 1, 2006, Respondents filed their response to Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus. On August 14, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and

Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied. 

In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Failure to timely file objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge

may be considered a waiver of a party’s right to de novo consideration of the issues. See

United States v. Reyna-Tapia 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

Case 3:06-cv-01679-MHM Document 13 Filed 09/30/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

After a complete and independent review of the issues presented, the Court finds itself

in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court [Doc. 12]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed

with prejudice [Doc. 1]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 30th day of September, 2008. 

Case 3:06-cv-01679-MHM Document 13 Filed 09/30/08 Page 2 of 2