Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00209/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00209-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

WILLIAM SLOAN COATS (STATE BAR NO. 94864) 

Email: wcoats@whitecase.com 

MARK R. WEINSTEIN (STATE BAR NO: 193043) 

Email: mweinstein@whitecase.com 

WENDI R. SCHEPLER (STATE BAR NO. 197474) 

Email: mschepler@whitecase.com 

CRAIG W. CLARK (STATE BAR NO. 226839) 

Email: cclark@whitecase.com 

WHITE & CASE LLP 

3000 El Camino Real 

5 Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor 

Palo Alto, California 94306 

Telephone: 650/213-0300 

Facsimile: 650/213-8158 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, MESA/BOOGIE, LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MESA/BOOGIE, LIMITED, a California 

Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

BAD CAT AMPLIFIER CO., INC., a 

California Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

*E-FILED 4/11/08*

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 1 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 1 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

Plaintiff Mesa/Boogie, Ltd. (“Mesa/Boogie”) and defendant Bad Cat Amplifier Co. Inc. 

(“Bad Cat”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 

enter the following Stipulated Protective Order (“Order”). 

1. INTRODUCTION 

 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are anticipated to lead to the production of 

confidential and proprietary information of the parties and non-parties. Public disclosure or 

improper use of this information for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would 

result in competitive harm and serious injury to the parties and non-parties. To protect the 

confidential and proprietary information of the parties and non-parties from improper disclosure, 

the parties stipulate to this Order. 

 The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 

information exchanged in this litigation and that the protection it affords extends only to the 

limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as 

confidential. 

2. DEFINITIONS 

 2.1 Party: Any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 

employees, consultants, retained experts and outside counsel (and their support staff). 

 2.2 Discovery Material: All documents, testimony, tangible items, and 

information produced by a Party or non-Party in this matter in disclosures (whether pursuant to 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Northern District Local Rules, or disclosed voluntarily) or 

responses to discovery (including, but not limited to, deposition testimony, documents produced 

in response to document requests, responses to interrogatories, and responses to requests for 

admissions). 

 2.3 “Confidential” Information: Any Discovery Material containing trade 

secrets or other confidential or proprietary technical, business or financial information, and 

designated by a Party or non-Party as “Confidential.” 

 2.4 “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information: Extremely 

sensitive “Confidential” Information whose disclosure to another Party or non-Party would create 

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 2 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 2 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

a substantial risk of serious injury or irreparable harm to a Party or non-Party, and which is 

designated by a Party or non-Party as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

 2.5 Receiving Party: A Party that receives Discovery Material in this action. 

 2.6 Producing Party: A Party or non-Party that discloses or produces 

Discovery Material in this action. 

 2.7 Designating Party: A Party or non-Party that designates Discovery 

Material it produces in this action as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes 

Only.” Non-Parties producing Discovery Material pursuant to a subpoena shall have all rights 

granted to Designating Parties. 

 2.8 Protected Material: Any Discovery Material that is designated as 

“Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

 2.9 Outside Counsel: Attorneys (as well as their support staff) who are not 

employees of a Party but who are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 

 2.10 House Counsel: Attorneys (as well as their support staff) who are 

employees of a Party. 

 2.11 Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 

pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert 

witness or consultant in this action and who is neither a current employee of a Party nor is 

anticipated to become an employee of a Party in the near future. This definition includes a 

professional jury or trial consultant retained in connection with this litigation. 

 2.12 Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support 

services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; 

organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 

subcontractors. 

 2.13 Final Disposition: For purposes of this Order, final disposition occurs after 

a judgment or dismissal finally terminating the above-captioned action with prejudice, including 

all appeals. 

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 3 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

3. SCOPE 

 The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined 

above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, 

summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or 

counsel in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material. 

 4. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 

 4.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 

Each Party or non-Party that designates Discovery Material for protection under this Order must 

take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate 

standards. If it comes to a Party’s or a non-Party’s attention that information or items that it 

designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of 

protection initially asserted, that Party or non-Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is 

withdrawing the mistaken designation, and of the correct designation. 

 4.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this 

Order, Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Protective Order must be clearly 

so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 

 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 

 (a) For documents (apart from transcripts of depositions or other 

pretrial or trial proceedings): The Producing Party must affix the legend “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” at the top or bottom of each page that contains 

Protected Material. 

 A Party or non-Party that makes original documents available for 

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated 

which documents it would like copied and produced. During this inspection and before the 

designation, all of the documents made available for inspection shall be deemed “Highly 

Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it 

wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions 

thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, and then, before producing the specified 

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 4 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 4 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only”) at the top or bottom of each page that contains Protected 

Material. 

 (b) For testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial 

proceedings: A Party or non-Party must either (1) state on the record, before the close of the 

deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, that the testimony shall be designated “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” or (2) provide written notice to all Parties, within 

10 days after receipt of the transcript, that the testimony shall be designated “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” The Parties shall treat the testimony as “Highly 

Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” until the expiration of the 10 day period. 

 Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be marked with the 

legend “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” as instructed by the Party 

or non-Party. 

 (c) For information produced in some form other than documentary, 

and for any other tangible items: The Producing Party must affix in a prominent place on the 

exterior of the container or containers in which the information or items is stored the legend 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

 4.3 Inadvertent Failure to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure 

to designate qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure 

protection under this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” after the material was initially 

produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable 

efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 

 5. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 

 5.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s 

confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary 

economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not 

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 5 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 5 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge 

promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 

 5.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a 

Designating Party’s confidentiality designation must begin the process by conferring directly with 

counsel for the Designating Party. A challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the 

challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first. 

 5.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a 

confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party 

may file and serve a motion under Civil Local Rule 7 (or by such other procedure as may be 

specified by the Court). The burden of proof in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the 

Designating Party. Until the Court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the 

material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s 

designation. 

 6. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

 6.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 

disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-Party in connection with this case only for 

prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be 

disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. 

When a Final Disposition occurs, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of Section 

12, below. 

 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 

location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under 

this Order. 

 6.2 Disclosure of “Confidential” Information. Unless otherwise ordered by the 

Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any 

information or item designated “Confidential” only to: 

 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as 

well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information 

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 6 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 6 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

for this litigation; 

 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of 

the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have 

signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (d) the Court and its personnel; 

 (e) Court reporters, their staffs, and Professional Vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; 

 (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure 

is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” 

(Exhibit A); and 

 (g) an author, signatory, or prior recipient of the document or the 

original source of the information. 

 6.3 Disclosure of “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information. 

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 

Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “Highly Confidential – 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” only to: 

 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as 

well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information 

for this litigation; 

 (b) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

 (c) the Court and its personnel; 

 (d) Court reporters, their staffs, and Professional Vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; and 

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 7 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 7 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

 (e) an author, signatory, or prior recipient of the document or the 

original source of the information. 

6.4 Use of Party’s Own Materials: Nothing in this Order shall restrict a Party’s 

ability to use and disclose its own designated materials as it chooses. Such disclosure shall not 

waive the protections of this Order and shall not entitle other Parties or non-Parties to disclose 

such materials in violation of this Order. 

7. IDENTIFICATION OF EXPERTS AND CONSULTANTS 

A Party desiring to disclose Discovery Materials designated “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” to an Expert shall first obtain from the Expert a signed 

undertaking in the form of Exhibit A hereto and a current resume (curriculum vitae). A copy of 

said undertaking and resume shall be served upon counsel for the Designating Party with a cover 

letter identifying each company for which the expert has done work in the past two years or with 

which the expert has an agreement to do work in the future. The Designating Party shall then 

have five days to serve a written objection to such disclosure. Any written objection shall state 

with specificity the reason(s) for such objection. If counsel for Designating Party objects within 

five business days, there shall be no disclosure to such Expert except by agreement of the Parties 

or by order of the Court. If an objection to disclosure is made within the five-day period, counsel 

for the Parties shall meet and confer to reach an agreement. Failing that and for good cause 

shown, the Party proposing the Expert may file a motion seeking permission to make the 

disclosure. On any such motion, the Designating Party shall bear the burden of showing why 

disclosure to the Expert should be precluded. 

 8. THIRD PARTY REQUESTS FOR PROTECTED MATERIAL 

 If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that 

would compel disclosure of any Protected Material designated in this action as “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” the Receiving Party must so notify the 

Designating Party immediately in writing, and in no event more than three court days after 

receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court 

order. 

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 8 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 8 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

 The Receiving Party also must immediately in writing inform the party who caused the 

subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the 

subpoena or order is the subject of this Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must deliver a 

copy of this Order promptly to the Party in the other litigation that caused the subpoena or order 

to issue. 

 9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Order, the Receiving 

Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosure, 

(b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or 

persons to whom unauthorized disclosure was made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request 

such person or persons to execute the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is 

attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

 10. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED MATERIAL 

 The Parties agree that inadvertent production of documents, items, or information subject 

to the attorney-client privilege or work product immunity (despite the Parties’ reasonable efforts 

to prescreen such documents, items, and information prior to production) does not waive the 

attorney-client privilege or work product immunity if the Producing Party requests a recall of 

such documents, items, or information promptly after the Producing Party learns of the 

inadvertent production. If the Receiving Party disagrees with the Producing Party’s recall 

request, the Receiving Party shall move to compel production of the recalled documents, items, or 

information no more than 30 days after receiving the recall request. The Receiving Party shall 

not use recalled documents, items, or information for any purpose until the Court makes a ruling 

on the motion to compel. If the Receiving Party does not file a motion to compel within 30 days 

of receiving the recall request, the Receiving Party shall destroy all copies, abstracts, 

compilations, summaries, or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of the recalled 

documents, items, or information in its possession. 

 11. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL 

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 9 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 9 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

 Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order secured after 

appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this action 

any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply 

with Civil Local Rule 79-5. 

 12. FINAL DISPOSITION 

Even after Final Disposition of this action (as defined above), the confidentiality 

obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees 

otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. 

Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within 90 days after 

a Final Disposition of this action, each Receiving Party must return to the Producing Party or 

destroy all Protected Material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all 

copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of 

the Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving 

Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party by the 90-day deadline affirming 

that all Protected Material has been returned or destroyed and that the Receiving Party has not 

retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or 

capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, (a) Counsel are entitled 

to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, 

correspondence or attorney work product (including exhibits, deposition exhibits, and trial 

exhibits), even if such materials contain Protected Material, and one copy of any Disclosure or 

Discovery Material for the sole purpose of maintaining a complete copy of the file of the action, 

and (b) Experts are entitled to retain an archival copy of any expert report prepared from any 

Protected Material provided to them. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute 

Protected Material remain subject to the confidentiality obligations of this Order. 

 13. MISCELLANEOUS 

 13.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 

person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 10 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 10 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

 13.1 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 

Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or 

producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Order. Similarly, no Party 

waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this 

Order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: April 11, 2008 WHITE & CASE LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Craig W. Clark 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MESA/BOOGIE, LTD. 

 

Dated: April 11, 2008 MACPHERSON KWOK CHEN & HEID LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Jennifer Lantz 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BAD CAT AMPLIFIER CO., INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: ____________________________

 The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

 United States District Judge 

ATTESTATION UNDER GENERAL ORDER 45

I, Craig W. Clark, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulated 

Protective Order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Jennifer Lantz 

has concurred in this filing and that I will keep her signature on file. 

xxxxxxxxxxx Richard Seeborg

xxxxxxxxxxx Magistrate Judge

April 11, 2008

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 11 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PALOALTO 87460 (2K) 11 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. CV-08-00209-JF

EXHIBIT A 

AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY PROTECTIVE ORDER 

 I, ______________________, declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its 

entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of California in the case of Mesa/Boogie, Ltd. v. Bad Cat 

Amplifier Co., Inc., Case No. CV-08-00209-JF. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all 

the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so 

comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly 

promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this 

Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions 

of this Order. 

 

Printed Name: __________________________________________________________ 

 

Address: _______________________________________________________________ 

Present Employer: _______________________________________________________ 

Date: ________________________________ 

City and State where sworn and signed: ___________________________________________ 

Signature: _______________________________________ 

 

Case 5:08-cv-00209-JF Document 20 Filed 04/11/08 Page 12 of 12