Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01611/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01611-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON ORTIZ v WINTER

DEFENDANT DONALD W. WINTER’S MOTION CASE NO: 1:06-CV-01611-OWW-TAG

TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

ROGER NUTTALL, ESQ. #42500

NUTTALL & COLEMAN

2445 CAPITOL ST STE 150

FRESNO CA 93721

TELEPHONE (559)233-2900

FACSIMILE (559)485-3852

Attorneys for Plaintiff

 HOPE ORTIZ

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

**********

HOPE ORTIZ, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v )

 )

DONALD C. WINTER, SECRETARY OF )

THE UNITED STATES NAVY, PHIL )

MILLS, STEVE HEDIN, VINCE MOTTO, )

AND DEE RICHARDS, )

 )

Defendants. )

_________________________________ )

CASE NO. 1:06-CV-01611-OWW-

 TAG

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE

ON DEFENDANT DONALD W.

WINTER’S MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Date: 8/13/07

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Ctrm: 3

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties in the aboveentitled action, through their respective counsel of record, that

(1) the hearing on Defendant Donald W. Winter’s Motion to Dismiss

Plaintiff’s Complaint be continued to October 22, 2007 at 10:00

a.m.; (2) Plaintiff’s opposition is to be filed and served on or

before October 5, 2007; and (3) Defendant’s reply brief is to be

filed and served pursuant to the statutory time.

Good cause exists for continuing the hearing date. Counsel

for Plaintiff was under the erroneous belief that Randall M.

Penner, had been associated as counsel and was preparing the

Case 1:06-cv-01611-OWW -TAG Document 12 Filed 08/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON ORTIZ v WINTER

DEFENDANT DONALD W. WINTER’S MOTION CASE NO: 1:06-CV-01611-OWW-TAG

TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

- 2 -

opposition. It was only after counsel was notified by the Court

that no opposition had been filed, the error was discovered. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: August 8, 2007. NUTTALL & COLEMAN

 /s/ Roger T. Nuttall

By _______________________________

ROGER NUTTALL

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: August 8, 2007. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

 /s/ Brian W. Enos

By _____________________________

BRIAN W. ENOS

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

Donald W. Winter

*****************

ORDER

Good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the hearing on Defendant Donald W.

Winter’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint be continued to

October 22, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.; plaintiff’s opposition is to be

filed and served on or before October 5, 2007; and (3) defendant’s

reply brief is to be filed and served on or before the statutory

time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01611-OWW -TAG Document 12 Filed 08/10/07 Page 2 of 2