Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04161/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04161-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 07-04161 WHA

-1- STIPULATION RE RIVERBED'S 

OPPOSITION TO QUANTUM'S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

[COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGES]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

QUANTUM CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Defendant.

RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Counterclaimant,

vs.

QUANTUM CORPORATION,

Counterdefendant.

CASE NO. C 07-4161 WHA

STIPULATION RE RIVERBED'S 

OPPOSITION TO QUANTUM’S MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE QUANTUM 

CORPORATION’S FIRST AMENDED 

REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIM, AND 

COUNTERCLAIMS AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER THEREON

Case 3:07-cv-04161-WHA Document 90 Filed 02/29/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

51198/2316696.1

Case No. C 07-04161 WHA

-2- STIPULATION RE RIVERBED'S 

OPPOSITION TO QUANTUM'S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

Riverbed Technology, Inc. ("Riverbed") and Quantum Corporation ("Quantum") 

respectfully request that the Court enter the following stipulation regarding Riverbed's Opposition 

To Quantum's Motion For Leave To File Quantum Corporation's First Amended Reply To 

Counterclaim And Counterclaim (Docket No. 75). In light of Judge Robinson's decision to 

transfer the Delaware action involving the '810 patent to the Northern District of California, the 

parties have met and conferred and are attempting to reach an agreement regarding how their 

respective patent infringement claims should proceed. To enable the parties to continue their 

discussions and prepare a plan for filing with the Court, the parties jointly agree to extend the due 

date for Riverbed's opposition to Quantum's motion for leave to amend by one day – to February

29, 2008.

The parties to this action, through their respective counsel of record, AGREE TO AND 

HEREBY STIPULATE as follows: Riverbed's opposition to Quantum motion for leave to 

amend shall be due on February 29, 2008. 

Dated: February 28, 2008 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP

/s/ Todd M. Briggs

Todd M. Briggs

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant,

RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Dated: February 28, 2008 SHEPPARD MULLIN

/s/ Mauricio Flores

Mauricio Flores

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

QUANTUM CORPORATION

I, Todd M. Briggs, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to

file this document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that counsel for Quantum 

has concurred in this filing.

Case 3:07-cv-04161-WHA Document 90 Filed 02/29/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

51198/2316696.1

Case No. C 07-04161 WHA

-3- STIPULATION RE RIVERBED'S 

OPPOSITION TO QUANTUM'S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: _________________

Honorable William H. Alsup

United States District Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

February 29, 2008

Case 3:07-cv-04161-WHA Document 90 Filed 02/29/08 Page 3 of 3