Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01014/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01014-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY ALEXANDER, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-1014 LKK KJM P

vs.

LIEUTENANT PLAINER, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This matter was on calendar on January 14, 2008 for trial confirmation hearing. 

Plaintiff appeared in pro per via videoconferencing; Anthony O’Brien, Deputy Attorney General,

appeared for defendants Aguilera, Cook, Iannone, Nichols, Plainer, and Stiles.

After hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Trial is confirmed for April 15, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. before the Honorable

Lawrence K. Karlton in Courtroom Four, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California;

2. Defendants may present the testimony of MTA Winters and Dr. Rohlfing by

affidavit;

3. Within ten days of the date of this order, plaintiff may file a motion to

reconsider the magistrate judge’s denial of plaintiff’s motion to inspect the officer defendants’

Case 2:03-cv-01014-LKK -KJM Document 134 Filed 01/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 In California criminal practice, this is called a “Pitchess motion.” Pitchess v. Superior

Court, 11 Cal.3d 531 (1974); see Cal. Evid. Code §§ 1043-1045; Cal. Penal Code §§ 832.7 &

832.8.

2

files for any past complaints of excessive force or false statements.1

 Defendants’ opposition to

the motion to reconsider, if any, is due ten days after the filing of the motion.

DATED: January 14, 2008.

Case 2:03-cv-01014-LKK -KJM Document 134 Filed 01/15/08 Page 2 of 2