Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00948/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00948-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARMANDO OJEDA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

J.M. FUENTES, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00948-AWI-SMS PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 16)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

CLAIMS (Doc. 11)

Plaintiff Armando Ojeda (“plaintiff”), a former state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this

civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 3, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. To date,

plaintiff has not filed any objection to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:05-cv-00948-RC Document 24 Filed 06/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 3, 2007,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This shall action proceed on plaintiff’s amended

complaint, filed May 15, 2006, against defendants Fuentes,

Montana, and Parks under the Eighth Amendment for failure to

protect plaintiff from harm and under California law for

negligence arising out of the attack on plaintiff; and,

3. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical care claim and

state negligence claims arising out of defendant Fuentes’ failure

to train defendants Montana and Parks and the maintenance of the

prison facilities are DISMISSED, with prejudice, for failure to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 2, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00948-RC Document 24 Filed 06/04/07 Page 2 of 2