Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02588/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02588-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HENRY R. HU and STEPHANIE F. HU, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LANEY LEE, JASON WANG, STEWARD 

WANG, ANITA BEI HUANG, JERRY 

HUANG, EDWARD WONG, KING MARK, I95 MALL OF ASIA INC., A.T.E.C. 

HOLDING INC., AMERICAN PRODUCTS 

EXHIBITION & EXCHANGE CENTER 

(U.S.A.), INC., ETRADE GUARANTEE 

ASSURANCE CORP., EASY EXPRESS 

SERVICES CORP., KATHY WANG, RUNAN 

ZHANG, ANDY TING, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 09-2588 SC 

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT RUNAN 

ZHANG TO RESPOND TO SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

 The Court has received Defendant Runan Zhang's ("Zhang's) ex 

parte motion, entitled Notice of Motion and Motion to Extend Time, 

Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike ("Zhang Motion"). This 

document was e-filed on the Court's electronic docket on February 

11, 2010. Docket No. 45. Plaintiffs Henry R. Hu and Stephanie F. 

Hu ("Plaintiffs") have since submitted a partial Statement of NonOpposition to the Zhang Motion, and do not oppose Zhang's request 

to extend the time to respond to the Second Amended Complaint. 

Docket No. 46. The Court therefore GRANTS Zhang's request to 

extend the time to respond to the Second Amended Complaint, and the 

Case 3:09-cv-02588-SC Document 50 Filed 02/17/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

remainder of the Zhang Motion is therefore taken as submitted as a 

Motion to Dismiss. 

 The Court will consider the remainder of the Zhang Motion on 

the papers; there will be no oral argument or appearances. Zhang's 

Motion to Appear by Telephone (Docket No. 46) is therefore DENIED 

as moot. The Court will set April 9, 2010 as the effective date 

for determining the deadlines for pleadings responsive to Zhang's 

Motion. Plaintiffs may submit an Opposition, or a Statement of 

Non-Opposition, no later than March 19, 2010. Zhang may submit a 

Reply no later than March 26, 2010. The briefs must be properly 

e-filed, and must comply with the appropriate Civil Local Rules. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 16, 2010 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02588-SC Document 50 Filed 02/17/10 Page 2 of 2