Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-02797/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-02797-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

AMENDED MINUTES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMERITOX v. MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES CLINICAL SUPPLY Case No. 12cv2797 W(RBB)

Time Spent: 

HON. RUBEN B. BROOKS CT. DEPUTY VICKY LEE Rptr. 

Attorneys

Plaintiffs Defendants

 

PROCEEDINGS: In Chambers In Court Telephonic

On November 8, 2013, Millennium Laboratories Clinical Supply, Inc. ("MLCS")

filed an Emergency Motion for a Stay Pending the District Court's Ruling on

the November 1, 2013 Emergency Ex Parte Application [ECF No. 50]. In this

filing, MLCS states that on November 1, 2013, it filed an ex parte

application with the district court to stay this Court's October 25, 2013

Order Granting [Ameritox]'s] Motion to Compel and Enforce February 19, 2013

Discovery Order [ECF No. 46]. MLCS contends that its "right to interpose

meaningful Rule 72 Objections to the District Court by Friday November 8,

2013 (i.e., objections filed on a Friday are very unlikely to be ruled on by

the following Monday) [the deadline for compliance with this Court's

order][,]" rendering its right to object moot. (Millennium Labs. Clinical

Supply Emergency Motion 2, ECF No. 50.) 

Objections to this Court's February 13 or October 25, 2013 orders have not

been filed. The twenty-six line Emergency Application is insufficient. MLCS

has not met its burden of showing that a stay is appropriate. In ruling on a

motion to stay, the Court determines (1) whether MLCS has made a strong

showing that it is likely to succeed on the merits of its appeal, (2) if MLCS

has demonstrated that it will be irreparably injured absent a stay, (3)

whether the other interested parties will suffer substantial harm if a stay

is imposed, and (4) if a stay is in the public interest. Hilton v.

Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 (1987). 

The Emergency Motion [ECF No. 50] is denied.

DATE: November 8, 2013 IT IS SO ORDERED: _________________________

Ruben B. Brooks, 

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

cc: Judge Whelan INITIALS: VL (mg) Deputy

 All Parties of Record

I:\Chambers Brooks\CASES\AMERITOX2797\Minutes09.wpd

Case 3:12-cv-02797-W-RBB Document 51 Filed 11/08/13 Page 1 of 1