Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07307/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07307-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Securities &amp; Exchange Commission Act

---

[] ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION

Case No. C-06-06304-RMW 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re TVIA INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 06-CV-06304-RMW 

CLASS ACTION

[] ORDER APPROVING PLAN 

OF ALLOCATION 

ORDER 

 WHEREAS, the Court has granted final approval to the Settlement of the abovereferenced class action; 

 WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel, The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., appointed by the 

Court as Class Counsel for the purposes of the Settlement have petitioned the Court for 

approval of the Plan of Allocation of the net settlement proceeds in the above-captioned action; 

and 

*E-FILED - 2/6/08*

Case 5:06-cv-07307-RMW Document 17 Filed 02/06/08 Page 1 of 2
 

[] ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION

Case No. C-06-06304-RMW 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed the application and supporting materials filed 

therewith, and has heard the presentation made by Class Counsel during the final approval 

hearing, and due consideration having been had thereon. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered: 

1. For the purposes of this Order, the terms herein shall have the same meanings as 

set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated October 3, 2007 on file with the Court (the 

“Stipulation). 

2. Pursuant to, an in full compliance with, Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure and the PSLRA, this Court hereby finds and concluded that due and adequate notice 

was directed to all Persons and entities who are Members of the Class advising them of the 

Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and other aspects of the Settlement, including their right to 

object thereto, and a full and fair opportunity was accorded to all Persons who are Members of 

the Class to be heard with respect to any respect to the Settlement. 

3. The Court hereby finds and concludes that the formula for the calculation of the 

claims of Authorized Claimants, which is set forth in the Notice of Pendency and Proposed 

Settlement of Class Action (the “Notice”) sent to Members of the Class, provides a fair and 

reasonable basis upon which to allocate the proceeds of the settlement fund established by the 

Stipulation among Class Members, with due consideration having been given to administrative 

convenience and necessity. 

4. The Court hereby finds and concluded that the Plan of Allocation set forth in the 

Notice is in all respects fair reasonable and the Court hereby approves the Plan of Allocation. 

Dated 2/4/08 

 SO ORDERED: 

 

HON. RONALD M. WHYTE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:06-cv-07307-RMW Document 17 Filed 02/06/08 Page 2 of 2