Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05445/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05445-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT GIBSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WARDEN OF CORCORAN STATE

PRISON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-05445-OWW-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 148)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION

TO DISMISS (Doc. 101)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff, Robert Gibson (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On October 23, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On October 30, 2006 and November 6, 2006, respectively,

plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.

Case 1:03-cv-05445-LJO -DLB Document 163 Filed 12/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 23,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed March 10, 2006, is

GRANTED IN PART as follow:

a. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Lawton,

Hass, Beer, Buller, Bailey, See, and Rousseau relating to the

June 16, 2002, incident are DISMISSED for failure to exhaust;

b. Defendants Hickman, Yamamoto, Dill, Ortiz, and

Scribner are DISMISSED from this action for plaintiff’s failure

to exhaust; and,

c. This action proceed only on plaintiff’s claims

against defendants Beer, Gonzales, and Hayward regarding the

March 31, 2004, incident.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 21, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05445-LJO -DLB Document 163 Filed 12/27/06 Page 2 of 2