Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-1_05-cv-00319/USCOURTS-almd-1_05-cv-00319-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 12:635 Breach of Insurance Contract

---

1

 It is clearly established in this circuit that the district court may “consider post-removal

evidence” in determining the propriety of removal. Sierminski v. Transouth Fin. Corp., 216 F.3d

945, 949 (11th Cir. 2000). However, “‘the jurisdictional facts that support removal must be judged

at the time of the removal, and any post petition affidavits are allowable only if relevant to that

period of time.’” Id. (quoting Allen v R&H Oil Co., 63 F.3d 1326, 1335 (5th Cir. 1995) (emphasis

added)). Under Sierminski, affidavits filed by plaintiffs in cases may be considered in determining

jurisdiction to the extent that they clarify the Complaint by identifying that the amount in controversy

was not in excess of $75,000 at the time the case was removed and will not be in excess of $75,000

in the future. See Moss v. Voyager Ins. Cos., 43 F. Supp. 2d 1298, 1303-1304 (M.D. Ala. 1999)

(because plaintiff had “submitted a binding Stipulation in which she promised to neither seek nor

accept damages in excess of $75,000,” the defendants failed to prove by a preponderance of the

evidence that damages would exceed $75,000.). Such affidavits should establish that, at the time

the complaint was filed, plaintiffs did not seek more than the jurisdictional amount and that plaintiffs

will not accept a jury award for more than the jurisdictional amount. The court notes that, although

not required, some plaintiffs even agree in their affidavits to an irrevocable cap on damages of

$74,999, exclusive of interest and costs. In the case subjudice, the affidavit submitted by plaintiff

Pamela Meachum satisfies these requirements. (See Doc. # 6). 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PAMELA MEACHUM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 1:05-cv-319-F

) WO

STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY )

COMPANY, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the plaintiff's Motion for Abstention and Motion to Remand

filed on April 19, 2005 which was accompanied by the affidavit of Pamela Meachum1

 (Doc.

# 6), and the Consent to Remand filed by the defendant (Doc. # 7), it is hereby

Case 1:05-cv-00319-MEF-DRB Document 8 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED that the motion to remand (Doc. # 6) is GRANTED and the motion for

abstention is DENIED. Accordingly, the above-styled lawsuit is hereby REMANDED to

the Circuit Court of Geneva County, Alabama.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the necessary steps to effectuate the

remand of this case to the Circuit Court of Geneva County, Alabama.

DONE this 26th day of April, 2005.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00319-MEF-DRB Document 8 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 2