Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00863/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-00863-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[Proposed] Order (C 14-0863 PSG (PR))

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DESHAWN MITCHELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

K. KOCINSKI,

Defendant.

Case No. C 14-0863 VC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

JOINT STIPULATION FOR SECOND

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

DISPOSITIVE MOTION

This is a prisoner-civil-rights lawsuit regarding alleged retaliation in violation of the First

Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by Defendant Officer Kocinski against Plaintiff Deshawn

Mitchell, a California inmate.

Officer Kocinski was originally ordered to file a dispositive motion by November 25, 2014.

Officer Kocinski requested and the Court granted a sixty-day extension of time for Officer

Kocinski to file a dispositive motion, up to and including January 26, 2015. (ECF No. 21.)

The Court has read and considered the Joint Stipulation for a Second Extension of Time

and the accompanying declaration of Kocinski’s counsel, and finds that good cause exists to grant

the request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time is

GRANTED.

Case 3:14-cv-00863-VC Document 26 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[Proposed] Order (C 14-0863 PSG (PR))

Officer Kocinski’s dispositive motion shall be filed by February 25, 2015. Plaintiff’s

opposition to Officer Kocinski’s dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court and served upon

Officer Kocinski no later than twenty-eight days after Officer Kocinski serves Plaintiff with the

motion. Officer Kocinski shall file a reply brief within fourteen days of the date on which

Plaintiff serves the opposition. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply

brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________________________ __________________________

The Honorable Vince Chhabria

February 12, 2015

Case 3:14-cv-00863-VC Document 26 Filed 02/12/15 Page 2 of 2