Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00688/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00688-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRYL KEITH BRYANT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0688 GEB EFB P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for civil rights violations. See 42

U.S.C. § 1983. On October 12, 2006, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Motion for Discovery.” 

On November 30, 2006, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. The court construes plaintiff’s

motion as a motion to compel discovery, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(2)(B), and for the reasons

explained below, denies the motion.

A party may move for an order compelling discovery with respect to objections or other

failure to respond to interrogatories, requests to produce documents or requests for admissions. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(2)(B), 33(b)(5), 34(b). However, plaintiff does not make any showing that

he served discovery requests on any party and that the party made any objection thereto. 

Therefore, there is no basis for granting plaintiff’s motion.

////

Case 2:06-cv-00688-GEB-EFB Document 33 Filed 03/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that plaintiff’s October 12, 2006, motion is denied.

Dated: March 14, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00688-GEB-EFB Document 33 Filed 03/14/07 Page 2 of 2