Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03467/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03467-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

Tru

c

k

er ö H

uss

A Professional Corporation

100 Montgomery Street, 23

rd

Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT; 

Case No. 09-cv-03467-JAM-DAD

1

#1058461 

R. Bradford Huss, No. 71303 

Robert F. Schwartz, No. 227327 

Michelle L. Schuller, No. 255787 

TRUCKER ö HUSS 

A Professional Corporation 

100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 788-3111 

Facsimile: (415) 421-2017 

E-mail: bhuss@truckerhuss.com

 rschwartz@truckerhuss.com 

 mschuller@truckerhuss.com

Attorneys for Defendants DAVID NICKUM, 

VALLEY AGGREGATE TRANSPORT, INC., 

and ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE 

FOR THE VALLEY AGGREGATE, INC., 

EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

EDWARD CLARKE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICHAEL LINDEMAN, LORRAINE 

LINDEMAN, DAVID NICKUM, VALLEY 

AGGREGATE TRANSPORT, INC., and 

ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE FOR 

THE VALLEY AGGREGATE, INC., 

EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 09-cv-03467-JAM-DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE 

COMPLAINT 

Defendants MICHAEL LINDEMAN, LORRAINE LINDEMAN, DAVID NICKUM, 

VALLEY AGGREGATE TRANSPORT, INC., and ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE FOR 

THE VALLEY AGGREGATE, INC., EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN (“Defendants”) 

and Plaintiff EDWARD CLARKE (“Plaintiff”) hereby stipulate, by and through their respective 

counsel, to extend the time by which all Defendants must file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s 

Complaint. Pursuant to this stipulation, Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before 

February 24, 2010. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-03467-JAM-DAD Document 7 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
Tru

c

k

er ö H

uss

A Professional Corporation

100 Montgomery Street, 23

rd

Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT; 

Case No. 09-cv-03467-JAM-DAD

2

#1058461 

This extension will not alter any dates or deadlines set by Court order. 

DATED: February 10, 2010 TRUCKER ö HUSS 

By: /s/R. Bradford Huss 

R. Bradford Huss 

Attorneys for Defendants 

David Nickum, Valley Aggregate Transport, Inc., 

and Administration Committee for the Valley 

Aggregate, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan 

DATED: February 10, 2010 MCDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN P.C. 

By: /s/Zachary Smith (as authorized on 2-10-2010)

Zachary Smith 

Robert Rubin 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Michael Lindeman and Lorraine Lindeman 

 

DATED: February 10, 2010 LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER 

 & JACKSON, P.C. 

By: /s/Daniel Feinberg (as authorized on 2-9-2010)

Daniel Feinberg 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Edward Clarke 

ORDER 

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 11, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez_______

Honorable John A. Mendez 

U.S. District Court Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:09-cv-03467-JAM-DAD Document 7 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2