Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00212/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00212-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEMA ARMSTEAD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

P. SCHULTZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00212-OWW-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 12)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

COMPLAINT (Doc. 9)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Lema Armstead (“plaintiff”), is former prisoner

in federal custody proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau

of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On March 13, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On April 5, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

Case 1:05-cv-00212-OWW -DLB Document 14 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed March 13, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed July 5, 2005, is

DISMISSED, without leave to amend; and,

3. This action is therefore CONCLUDED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00212-OWW -DLB Document 14 Filed 06/27/06 Page 2 of 2