Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04596/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04596-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST 

TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS

(CASE NO. C06-04596 JW)

[Counsel List on Signature Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MACROVISION CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

 CASE NO. C06-04596 JW 

(consolidated with Case Nos. C06-04660 and 

C06-04659) 

STIPULATION AND JOINT 

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO 

ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS FOR MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MACROVISION CORPORATION, 

Counter-Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 

CORPORATION, 

Counter-Defendant. 

 

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Intertrust Technologies Corporation (“Intertrust”) will soon 

be filing a Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) asking this Court to affirm the decision of the 

Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences mailed September 13, 2005, finding that U.S. Patent 

Number 5,845,281, assigned to Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Macrovision Corporation 

(“Macrovision”), was procured by inequitable conduct. 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, the parties have agreed that the page limits for Intertrust’s 

Motion and Macrovision’s Opposition shall be enlarged. 

Accordingly, it is hereby stipulated that Intertrust’s Motion and Macrovision’s Opposition 

shall not exceed 35 pages. 

By her signature below, counsel for Intertrust attest that counsel for Macrovision concur in 

the filing of this stipulation. 

Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 71 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 72 Filed 04/25/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION AND JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST 

TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS

(CASE NO. C06-04596 JW))

DATED: April 24, 2007 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT 

& DUNNER, LLP 

 By / s / 

Linda J. Thayer (Bar No. 195,115) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 

 

Linda J. Thayer 

linda.thayer@finnegan.com 

Stanford Research Park 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Barbara C. McCurdy (Admitted Pro HacVice)

barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com 

901 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20001 

Telephone: (202) 408-4000 

Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 

Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 71 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 3
 Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 72 Filed 04/25/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

STIPULATION AND JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST 

TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS

(CASE NO. C06-04596 JW))

DATED: April 24, 2007 OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & 

NEUSTADT, P.C.

 By / s / 

Charles L. Gholz

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff 

MACROVISION CORP. 

Charles L. Gholz (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

cgholz@oblon.com 

W. Todd Baker (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

tbaker@oblon.com 

Frank J. West (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

fwest@oblon.com 

1940 Duke Street 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

Telephone: 703-413-3000 

Facsimile: 703-413-2220

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 

claudestern@quinnemanuel.com 

Michael D. Powell (Bar No. 202850) 

mikepowell@quinnemanuel.com 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 

Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 

Telephone: (650) 801-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: __________________________ ____________________________________________ 

 James Ware 

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 71 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 3 of 3

April 25, 2007 The parties' oppositions shall not exceed 35 pages.

Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 72 Filed 04/25/07 Page 3 of 3