Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05429/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05429-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MPK 115352-2.073241.0011 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL 

EXPERT REPORTS RE EBAY ISSUES

CASE NO. C-04-5429 CW (EMC) 

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III (136184) 

wgaede@mwe.com 

ANDREW A. KUMAMOTO (178541) 

akumamoto@mwe.com 

DAVID L. LARSON (112342) 

dlarson@mwe.com 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: (650) 813-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 813-5100 

Attorneys for Tercica, Inc. 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

M. PATRICIA THAYER (90818) 

patricia.thayer@hellerehrman.com 

ETHAN C. GLASS (216159) 

ethan.glass@hellerehrman.com 

333 Bush Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104-2878 

Telephone: (415) 772-6794 

Facsimile: (415) 772-6268 

Attorneys for Genentech, Inc. 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

LARRY L. SHATZER, Pro Hac Vice 

lshatzer@foley.com 

DOUGLAS H. CARSTEN (198467) 

dcarsten@foley.com 

3000 K Street, N.W. 

Washington, Dc 20007 

Telephone: (202) 672-5300 

Facsimile: (202) 672-5399 

Attorneys for Insmed Incorporated, Celtrix 

Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Insmed Therapeutic Proteins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

GENENTECH, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

and TERCICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

INSMED INCORPORATED, a Virginia 

corporation, CELTRIX PHARMACEUTICALS, 

INC., a Delaware corporation, and INSMED 

THERAPEUTIC PROTEINS, a Colorado 

corporation, 

Defendants. 

No. C-04-5429 CW (EMC) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL

EXPERT REPORT RESPONDING TO

THE RECENT EBAY CASE

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 653 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 1 of 4
 Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 679 Filed 10/16/06 Page 1 of 4
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MPK 115352-2.073241.0011 - 1 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL 

EXPERT REPORTS RE EBAY ISSUES

CASE NO. C-04-5429 CW (EMC) 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Motion For Leave to Submit a Supplemental Expert Report 

Responding to the Recent eBay Case came on for hearing September 15, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in the 

Courtroom C before the Honorable Edward M. Chen. David L. Larson of McDermott Will & 

Emery LLP appeared for Plaintiffs; Larry L. Shatzer of Foley & Lardner appeared by telephone 

for Defendants. 

 WHEREAS, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ Motion For Leave to Submit a Supplemental 

Expert Report Responding to the Recent eBay Case, ordering that Plaintiffs may serve expert 

report(s) regarding the factors affecting a request for permanent injunctive relief if there is a 

verdict in Plaintiffs’ favor in this matter. 

WHEREAS, the Court also ordered that Plaintiffs’ expert report(s), Defendants’ rebuttal expert 

report(s), and the document production by and depositions of those experts would occur after the 

verdict in Plaintiffs’ favor, on a schedule to be agreed upon by the parties. 

 In accordance with the ruling of the Court on the motion: 

STIPULATION 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel, that Plaintiffs shall serve any expert report(s) regarding the factors affecting a request for 

permanent injunctive relief on or before October 16, 2006. Defendants shall serve any rebuttal 

expert report(s) within 10 court days following entry of a verdict in Plaintiffs’ favor in this 

matter. 

 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel, that the parties will complete the depositions, if any, of experts submitting such reports 

at mutually convenient times within one (1) week following the day on which Defendants’ 

report(s) are due. 

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 653 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 2 of 4
 Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 679 Filed 10/16/06 Page 2 of 4
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MPK 115352-2.073241.0011 - 2 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL 

EXPERT REPORTS RE EBAY ISSUES

CASE NO. C-04-5429 CW (EMC) 

 SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: October 12, 2006 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY, LLP 

 By: /s/ David L. Larson 

David L. Larson 

 Attorneys for Tercica, Inc.

DATED: October 12, 2006 HELLER EHRMAN, LLP 

By: /s/ Ethan C. Glass Ethan C. Glass 

 Attorneys for Genentech, Inc.

DATED: October 12, 2006 FOLEY & LARDNER, LLP 

 By: /s/ Larry L. Shatzer Larry L. Shatzer 

Attorneys for Insmed Incorporated, Celtrix 

Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Insmed 

Therapeutic Proteins, Inc. 

-oOoORDER 

 Having considered the papers and arguments on the motion, and in light of the Stipulation 

above, and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Submit a Supplemental 

Expert Report Responding to the Recent eBay Case is hereby Granted. 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before 

October 16, 2006, Plaintiffs shall serve any expert report(s) regarding factors affecting a request 

for permanent injunctive relief. Defendants shall serve any rebuttal expert report(s) within 10 

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 653 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 3 of 4
 Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 679 Filed 10/16/06 Page 3 of 4
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MPK 115352-2.073241.0011 - 3 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL 

EXPERT REPORTS RE EBAY ISSUES

CASE NO. C-04-5429 CW (EMC) 

court days following entry of a verdict in Plaintiffs’ favor in this matter. The parties shall 

complete the depositions, if any, of experts submitting such reports within one (1) week following 

the day on which Defendants’ reports are due. 

SO ORDERED. 

DATED: HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN 

United States District Court Magistrate Judge 

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 653 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 4 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

October 16, 2006

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 679 Filed 10/16/06 Page 4 of 4