Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-03580/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-03580-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DYKEMA GOSSETT LLC

Tamara A. Bush (197153) tbush@dykema.com

333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3100

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 457-1800

Facsimile: (213) 457-1850

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC

John M. Thomas (266842,) David M. George – Pro Hac Vice

jthomas@dykema.com

dgeorge@dykema.com

2723 South State Street, Suite 400

Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Telephone: (734) 214-7613

Facsimile: (734) 214-7696

McAFEE & TAFT

Sherry A. Rozell, Pro Hac Vice

Sherry.rozell@mcafeetaft.com

Two W. Second Street, Suite 1100

Williams Center Tower II

Tulsa, OK 74103

Telephone: (918) 587-0001

Facsimile: (918) 574-3101

Attorneys for Defendant

FORD MOTOR COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DAVID BARANCO, JAMES ABBITT, 

HARRIET ABRUSCATO, DONALD 

BROWN, DANIEL CARON, ANITA 

FARRELL, JOHN FURNO, JAMES 

JENKIN, GARY KUBBER and 

MALISA NICOLAU, APRIL NICOLO, 

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a 

Delaware corporation; 

Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-CV-03580-EMC

Assigned to Hon. Edward M. Chen, Courtroom 5 – San Francisco

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ 

SECOND AMENDED CLASS 

ACTION COMPLAINT [L.R. 6-1(A)]

Complaint Filed: June 21, 2017

1st Amend Complaint: August 18, 2017 2nd Amend Complaint: April 11, 2018 Trial Date: None

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [L.R. 6 1(A)]

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03580

Case 3:17-cv-03580-EMC Document 95 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs and Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Ford”) (collectively 

the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on April 11, 2018, Plaintiffs’ filed a Second Amended Class 

Action Complaint;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), Ford’s responsive pleading 

is due on April 25, 2018; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that Ford may file its response to Plaintiffs’ 

Second Amended Complaint by May 9, 2018;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that if Ford files a partial motion to dismiss it 

need not file an answer until after the Court enters an order granting or denying such 

motion. 

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant, as the filer of this document, attests that 

concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other 

signatories:

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT:

1. Ford’s response to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is due by 

May 9, 2018. 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [L.R. 6 1(A)]

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03580

Case 3:17-cv-03580-EMC Document 95 Filed 04/25/18 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. If Ford responds by filing a partial motion to dismiss, it need not file an 

Answer to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint until after the Court 

decides Ford’s motion. 

Dated: April 25, 2018 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLC

By: /s/ Tamara A. Bush

David M. George (admitted pro hac vice) John M. Thomas

Tamara A. Bush

Attorneys for Defendant

FORD MOTOR COMPANY 

Dated: April 25, 2018 MCCUNE WRIGHT AREVALO LLP

By: /s/ Matthew D. Schelkopf . 

Matthew D. Schelkopf

Attorney for Plaintiffs

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [L.R. 6 1(A)]

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03580

Case 3:17-cv-03580-EMC Document 95 Filed 04/25/18 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, the Stipulation is 

GRANTED. The Court Orders that:

1. Ford’s response to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is due by 

May 9, 2018. 

2. If Ford responds by filing a partial motion to dismiss, it need not file an 

Answer to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint until after the Court decides 

Ford’s motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:________________ By: ________________________________

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

TO PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [L.R. 6 1(A)]

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-03580

4/25/18

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:17-cv-03580-EMC Document 95 Filed 04/25/18 Page 4 of 4