Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00930/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00930-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

QURIO HOLDINGS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00930-HSG 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On April 29, 2015, Judge Lee of the Northern District of Illinois denied Plaintiff Qurio

Holdings, Inc.’s motion to transfer venue of its lawsuit against Defendant DIRECTV, LLC to the 

Eastern District of North Carolina and granted DIRECTV’s motion to transfer venue to the 

Northern District of California. See Qurio Holdings, Inc. v. DIRECTV, LLC, No. 14-cv-07502, 

Dkt. 72 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2015). Currently pending in this Court is a similar motion by Plaintiff 

to transfer venue of this lawsuit against Defendant DISH Network Corp. to the Eastern District of 

North Carolina. See Dkt. 46. Defendant opposes the motion. See Dkt. 55. The patents at issue in 

Plaintiff’s lawsuit in this Court are identical to those at issue in Plaintiff’s lawsuit against 

DIRECTV. See Qurio Holdings, No. 14-cv-07502, Dkt. 72, at 1. 

Plaintiff is directed to file a supplemental brief of no more than five pages by May 15, 

2015 showing cause why its motion to transfer venue should not be denied in light of the Northern 

District of Illinois’s Order in the DIRECTV case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

5/4/2015

Case 4:15-cv-00930-HSG Document 65 Filed 05/04/15 Page 1 of 1