Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-00342/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-00342-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934

---

Proposed Order to Continue Briefing Dates.doc 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BREIFING DATES TO CORRESPOND WITH COURT ORDER STAYING 

ACTION FOR SIXTY (60) DAYS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOHN J. FLYNN III (SBN 76419) 

NOSSAMAN LLP 

18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800 

Irvine, California 92612-0177 

Telephone: (949) 833-7800 

Facsimile: (949) 833-7878 

jflynn@nossaman.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., a Delaware limited partnership; SPRINT SPECTRUM REALTY COMPANY, L.P., a Delaware 

limited partnership 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., a Delaware

limited partnership; SPRINT SPECTRUM 

REALTY COMPANY, L.P., a Delaware 

limited partnership, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO; BOARD OF 

SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF 

SAN MATEO, its governing body; MARK 

CHURCH, in his official capacity as Board Member of the Board of Supervisors for 

the County of San Mateo; JERRY HILL, in 

his official capacity as Board Member of 

the Board of Supervisors for the County of 

San Mateo; RICH GORDON, in his 

official capacity as Board Member of the 

Board of Supervisors for the of the County 

of San Mateo; ROSE GIBSON, in her 

official capacity as Board Member of the 

Board of Supervisors for the County of San 

Mateo; ADRIENNE TISSIER, in her 

official capacity as Board Member of the 

Board of Supervisors for the County of San 

Mateo; and DOES 1-10, inclusive. 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 08-00342 CW 

Hon. Claudia Wilken 

Courtroom 2 

ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING 

DATES TO CORRESPOND WITH 

COURT ORDER STAYING ACTION 

FOR SIXTY (60) DAYS 

Case 4:08-cv-00342-CW Document 36 Filed 08/27/08 Page 1 of 2
 - 1 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BREIFING DATES TO CORRESPOND WITH COURT ORDER STAYING 

ACTION FOR SIXTY (60) DAYS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court continues the briefing dates for a 

dispositive motion as follows: October 23, 2008 as the deadline for Sprint to file an 

opening brief; November 6, 2008 as the deadline for the County to file an opposition and 

any cross motion; November 13, 2008 as the deadline for Sprint to file a reply/opposition 

to cross motion; and November 20, 2008 as the deadline for the County to file a surreply. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 8/27/08 

Hon. CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge 

Case 4:08-cv-00342-CW Document 36 Filed 08/27/08 Page 2 of 2