Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-02998/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-02998-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

___________________________________________________________________________________ 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN 

RELATION TO ADDITIONAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 14-cv-02998-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585) 

pandre@kramerlevin.com 

LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404) 

lkobialka@kramerlevin.com 

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & 

FRANKEL LLP 

990 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 752-1700 

Facsimile: (650) 752-1800 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

FINJAN, INC. 

Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032) 

seanpak@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4788 

Telephone: (415) 875 6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875 6700 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Symantec Corporation 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SYMANTEC CORP., a Delaware Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: 14-cv-02998-HSG (JSC) 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN 

RELATION TO ADDITIONAL CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION

Case 4:14-cv-02998-HSG Document 149 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 5
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN 

RELATION TO ADDITIONAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 14-cv-02998-HSG 

 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to the Court’s order on November 4, 2016, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) and 

Defendant Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”) jointly file this stipulation: 

WHEREAS, the Court ordered additional briefing to address claim construction disputes raised 

in Symantec’s Motion for Additional Claim Construction and ordered the parties to meet and confer 

with respect to an expedited briefing schedule. See Dkt 145. 

In light of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED by and between the 

parties, through their respective counsel, the following schedule: 

Event Due Date 

Patent Local Rule 4-2 Disclosures November 11, 2016 

Patent Local Rule 4-3 Disclosures November 18, 2016 

Finjan’s Opening Claim Construction Brief 

(10 page limit) 

November 29, 2016 

Symantec’s Responsive Claim Construction 

Brief (12 page limit) 

December 13, 2016 

Finjan’s Reply Claim Construction Brief 

(5 page limit) 

December 20, 2016 

Markman Hearing (if desired by the Court) January 19, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. 

Or another time convenient for the Court. 

Dated: November 14, 2016 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Kristopher Kastens 

Paul Andre (State Bar. No. 196585) 

Lisa Kobialka (State Bar No. 191404) 

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 

990 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 752-1700 

Facsimile: (650) 752-1800 

Case 4:14-cv-02998-HSG Document 149 Filed 11/14/16 Page 2 of 5
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN 

RELATION TO ADDITIONAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 14-cv-02998-HSG 

 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

pandre@kramerlevin.com 

lkobialka@kramerlevin.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

FINJAN, INC.

Dated: November 14, 2016 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Alexander Rudis 

Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032) 

seanpak@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4788 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

David A. Nelson (pro hac vice) 

davenelson@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450 

Chicago, IL 60661 

Telephone: (312) 705-7400 

Facsimile: (312) 705-7401 

Alexander Rudis (pro hac vice) 

alexanderrudis@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor 

New York, NY 10010 

Telephone: (212) 849-7000 

Facsimile: (212) 849-7100 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SYMANTEC INC. 

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document. 

Case 4:14-cv-02998-HSG Document 149 Filed 11/14/16 Page 3 of 5
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN 

RELATION TO ADDITIONAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 14-cv-02998-HSG 

 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 By: /s/ Brianne M. Straka 

 Brianne M. Straka 

 

Case 4:14-cv-02998-HSG Document 149 Filed 11/14/16 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ________

JOINT S

RELATI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

PURSUA

T

Addition

Patent Lo

Patent Lo

Finjan’s 

(10 page 

Symante

Brief (12

Finjan’s 

(5 page l

DATED:

__________

TIPULATIO

ON TO ADD

ANT TO ST

There being a

nal Claim Co

ocal Rule 4-2

ocal Rule 4-3

Opening Cla

limit) 

c’s Respons

2 page limit) 

Reply Claim

imit) 

: November

___________

ON AND [P

DITIONAL 

TIPULATIO

a showing of

onstruction a

Event 

2 Disclosure

3 Disclosure

aim Constru

ive Claim C

m Constructio

r 14, 2016 

__________

ROPOSED]

CLAIM CO

ON, IT IS S

f good cause

as set forth in

es 

es 

uction Brief 

Construction 

on Brief 

___________

] ORDER RE

ONSTRUCT

4 

ORDER

O ORDERE

e based on th

n Dkt. 145 is

Nove

Nove

Nove

Dece

Dece

 ____

The 

__________

EGARDING

TION

ED. 

he parties’ st

s set forth be

ember 11, 20

ember 18, 20

ember 29, 20

ember 13, 20

ember 20, 20

__________

Honorable H

___________

G BRIEFING

CASE NO

tipulation, th

elow: 

Due Dat

016 

016 

016 

016 

016 

___________

Haywood S.

__________

G SCHEDU

O. 14-cv-02

he briefing sc

te 

________

. Gilliam, Jr.

_________ 

ULE IN 

998-HSG 

chedule for 

.

Case 4:14-cv-02998-HSG Document 149 Filed 11/14/16 Page 5 of 5