Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00918/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00918-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY SELSOR,

Plaintiff,

vs.

B. WEAVER, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:15-cv-00918-LJO-BAM (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 

DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND 

DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 14)

Plaintiff Jeffrey Selsor (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on June 16, 2015. 

On July 25, 2016, the Court screened Plaintiff’s amended complaint and found that he

stated a cognizable claim for excessive force against Correctional Officers Docanto and Jordan, 

and against Correctional Officer Castaneda for the failure to intervene in an attack, in violation 

of the Eighth Amendment, but did not state any other cognizable claims. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); 

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 

(2007). (ECF No. 11). Plaintiff was ordered to either file a second amended complaint, or notify 

the Court that he did not wish to file any second amended complaint and was willing to proceed 

on the cognizable claims. (ECF No. 12.)

On August 3, 2016, Plaintiff notified the Court that he did not intend to file a second 

amended complaint and wished to proceed only with the cognizable claims against Defendants 

Docanto, Jordan, and Castaneda. (ECF No. 13.) Accordingly, on August 8, 2016, the Magistrate 

Case 1:15-cv-00918-LJO-BAM Document 18 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending the dismissal of certain claims and 

defendants. (ECF No. 14.) Specifically, the Magistrate Judge recommended that (1) Plaintiff’s 

claim for excessive force against Defendant Castaneda; (2) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants 

Docanto, Jordan, and Castaneda for violating the CDCR use of force policy; and (3) Defendants 

Weaver, Nora and Juarez, be dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim, without 

further leave to amend. 

The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff, and contained notice that 

any objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after service of the order. (Id. at 14.) 

More than fourteen (14) days have passed, and no objections have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 

a de novo review of this case and carefully reviewed the entire file. The Court finds that the 

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations dated August 8, 2016 (ECF No. 14) are 

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on June 17, 

2016, for excessive force against Defendants Docanto and Jordan for allegedly 

attacking him on September 20, 2014, and against Defendant Castaneda for the 

failure to protect him from the attack, in violation of the Eighth Amendment;

3. Plaintiff’s claim for excessive force against Defendant Castaneda, and claims 

against Defendants Docanto, Jordan, and Castaneda for violating the CDCR use 

of force policy, are dismissed; and

4. Defendants B. Weaver, D. D. Nora, and V. Juarez are dismissed from this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00918-LJO-BAM Document 18 Filed 09/16/16 Page 2 of 2