Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00457/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00457-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This matter was determined to be suitable for decision without *

oral argument. L.R. 78-230(h).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT E. HUNTER, D.V.M., ) 2:06-cv-457-GEB-PAN

individually, and as class )

representative for all others ) ORDER*

similarly situated; HOWARD ELEY, )

individually, and as class )

representative for all others )

similarly situated, )

 )

Plaintiffs, ) 

)

v. ) 

)

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SHERIFF’S )

DEPARTMENT; et al., )

)

Defendants. )

)

On June 26, 2008, Plaintiffs filed an ex parte application

in which they seek an extension of time to file an opposition to

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment through a modification of the

Pre-Trial Scheduling Order. However, contrary Local Rule 6-144(c)

Plaintiffs application is unsupported by an “affidavit of counsel that

Case 2:06-cv-00457-GEB-AC Document 44 Filed 06/27/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a stipulation extending time cannot reasonably be obtained” and an

explanation of “the reasons why such a stipulation cannot be

obtained.” Therefore, the request is denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 26, 2008

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00457-GEB-AC Document 44 Filed 06/27/08 Page 2 of 2