Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00322/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00322-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1319 Clean Water Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

1

Harry Pascuzzi, 127221

Kenneth J. Jorgensen, 220887

PASCUZZI, O’NEILL & MOORE

2377 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 201

Fresno, California 93711

Tel: (559) 227-110

Fax: (559) 227-1290

E-Mail: kjorgensen@pascuzzi.net

Attorneys for Defendants, STEVE DRAKE and

KIM DRAKE, STEVE E. DRAKE AND KIM 

DRAKE LIVING TRUST; DRAKE 

CONTRACTING, INC., a California Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

FOOTHILL CONSERVATION, LLC, a

California Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

v

STEVE E. DRAKE and KIM DRAKE,

individually and as trustees of the STEVE

E. DRAKE AND KIM DRAKE LIVING

TRUST; DRAKE CONTRACTING,

INC., a California Corporation; TOM F.

CAMPAGNA; BRYAN LEHMAN;

SHAYLA LEHMAN; SHELDON

CRAIG SANDSTROM; HEATHER

DAWN SANDSRTOM; JOHN

KASAIAN; SUZETTE KASAIAN;

DOUGLAS BENIK; DIANA BENIK;

CHARLES W. HOUSE; MARY

MARGARET HOUSE; CHRISTOPHER

LUM as trustee of the LUM FAMILY

TRUST OF 1991 and as trustee of the

STEVEN C.Y. LUM AND CATHERINE

J. LUM TRUST DATED AUGUST 12,

1991; STEVEN G. FOGG; and

STEPHANIE FOGG; and DOES 1

through 10;

Defendants.

_________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00322-OWW-LJO

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE

PLEADING and ORDER

It is hereby stipulated between Defendants, STEVE E. DRAKE, KIM DRAKE,

Case 1:06-cv-00322-OWW -LJO Document 21 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

2

THE STEVE E. DRAKE AND KIM DRAKE LIVING TRUST, AND DRAKE

CONTRACTING, INC., and Plaintiff, FOOTHILL CONSERVATION, LLC, that said

Defendants have an extension to July 7, 2006 by which they may file a responsive pleading to

FOOTHILL CONSERVATION, LLC’S, Complaint in the above-entitled matter.

Dated: June 5, 2006 Pascuzzi, O’Neill & Moore

By:_/s/ Kenneth J. Jorgensen______

Kenneth J. Jorgensen

Attorney for Defendants:

STEVE E. DRAKE, KIM DRAKE,

THE STEVE E. DRAKE AND KIM

DRAKE LIVING TRUST; DRAKE

CONTRACTING, INC.

Dated: June 5, 2006 WALTER LAW GROUP

By:__/s/ Gregory S. Powell________

Gregory S. Powell

Attorney for Plaintiff:

FOOTHILL CONSERVATION,

LLC

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants, STEVE E. DRAKE, KIM DRAKE,.

THE STEVE E. DRAKE AND KIM DRAKE LIVING TRUST, AND DRAKE

CONTRACTING, INC. are granted an extension of 30 days within which to file their responsive

pleading in response to Plaintiff, FOOTHILL CONSERVATION, LLC’S, Complaint in this

matter. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 8, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00322-OWW -LJO Document 21 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 2