Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01210/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01210-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAMERON WAYNE SMITH, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

PAUL M. SCHULTZ, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-CV-01210 OWW LJO HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #10]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On October 23, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. 

Specifically, Petitioner had failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address. This Findings

and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within ten (10) days of the date of service of the

order. Over ten (10) days have passed and no party has filed objections. The Court notes the

Findings and Recommendation were returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable.

Case 1:05-cv-01210-OWW -LJO Document 12 Filed 12/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued October 23, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 3, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01210-OWW -LJO Document 12 Filed 12/04/06 Page 2 of 2