Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02484/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02484-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Time to Respond to Complaint (2:12-cv-02484)

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672

Attorney General of California

TAMAR PACHTER, State Bar No. 146083

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

PAUL STEIN, State Bar No. 184956

Deputy Attorney General

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000

San Francisco, CA 94102-7004

Telephone: (415) 703-5740

Fax: (415) 703-1234

E-mail: Paul.Stein@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for All Defendants 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

DONALD WELCH ET AL.,

Plaintiff,

v.

EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. GOVERNOR 

OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN 

HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL.,

Defendant.

2:12-cv-02484

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ 

TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Date:

Time:

Courtroom: 5, 14th Floor

Judge: The Honorable William B. 

Shubb

Trial Date: None set

Action Filed: Oct. 1, 2012

Plaintiffs Donald Welch, et al. and Defendants Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor of the 

State of California, in his official capacity, et al., hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

(1) Plaintiffs filed their complaint in this action on October 1, 2012, and served the 

summons and complaint on Defendants on October 22, 2012;

(2) On October 29, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, and set 

the hearing on their motion for December 3, 2012;

Case 2:12-cv-02484-WBS-KJN Document 27 Filed 11/06/12 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Time to Respond to Complaint (2:12-cv-02484)

(3) Defendants’ deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action is 

November 12, 2012, and their opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is due 

November 19, 2012; and 

(4) In the interest of conserving party and judicial resources, and in the efficient and 

orderly administration of this case, Defendants should not be required to answer or otherwise 

respond to the complaint in this action until after this Court has ruled on Plaintiffs’ motion for a 

preliminary injunction. No other extensions of time have been requested by either Plaintiffs or 

Defendants in this case.

Now, based on the foregoing, the parties further stipulate and agree that Defendants’ 

deadline to answer or otherwise respond to to the complaint in this action shall be twenty-eight 

(28) days after this Court issues a decision on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction.

Case 2:12-cv-02484-WBS-KJN Document 27 Filed 11/06/12 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Time to Respond to Complaint (2:12-cv-02484)

Dated: November 2, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

TAMAR PACHTER

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

/s/ Paul Stein

PAUL STEIN

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for All Defendants 

Kevin T. Snider (SBN 170988)

Michael J. Peffer (SBN 192265)

Matthew B. McReynolds (SBN 234797)

PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE

P.O. Box 276600

Sacramento, CA 95827

Tel: (916) 857-6900

Fax: (916) 857-6902

Email: ksnider@pji.org

/s/ Kevin T. Snider

Attorneys for All Plaintiffs 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 2, 2012 

SA2012108118

20647944.doc

Case 2:12-cv-02484-WBS-KJN Document 27 Filed 11/06/12 Page 3 of 3