Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06533/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06533-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BRANCART & BRANCART

 Christopher Brancart (SBN 128475)

 Elizabeth Brancart (SBN 122092)

Post Office Box 686

Pescadero, CA 94060

Tel: (650) 879-0141

Fax: (650) 879-1103

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHELLE EZELL, et al., ) 

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

)

vs. )

)

)

EDWARDS THEATRES, INC., )

et al., )

)

Defendants. ) 

)

Case No. 1:04-CV-06533-SMS

JOINT APPLICATION AND

STIPULATION RE

MODIFICATION OF

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

ORDER; ORDER

The parties hereby apply for and stipulate to issuance of an order modifying the

Scheduling Conference Order by vacating the current litigation dates and extending

those dates for five weeks as follows: 

Discovery Deadline: August 25, 2006 

Non-Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: September 1, 2006 

Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: September 8, 2006 

Pre-Trial Conference Date: October 5, 2006 

Trial Date: November 13, 2006 

The settlement conference date of September 14, 2006, remains the same.

There is good cause to grant this request for the following reasons: After

motions to compel and discovery conferences with this Court, the parties’ disputes

Case 1:04-cv-06533-SMS Document 59 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

regarding interrogatories and requests for production of documents were resolved and

defendants supplemented their discovery responses. With that documentary

discovery in hand, the parties will be taking their previously noticed depositions.

Those depositions were not able to be scheduled in June because plaintiffs’ counsel

was engaged in trial in the Central District of California for most of the month and

defendants’ counsel’s wedding took place during that time. The parties wish to

extend the litigation deadlines out for five weeks to enable them to complete discovery

and to attend the settlement conference scheduled for September 14, 2006, prior to

commencing trial preparation. 

So stipulated. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: July 11, 2006. BRANCART & BRANCART

/s/ Elizabeth Brancart

Elizabeth Brancart

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: July 11, 2006. THELEN REID & PRIEST , LLP

/s/ Christine A. Cantin

Christine A. Cantin

Attorneys for Defendants

* * * * *

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing joint application, and good cause appearing

therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the litigation schedule is modified as

follows:

Discovery Deadline: August 25, 2006 

Non-Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: September 1, 2006 

Case 1:04-cv-06533-SMS Document 59 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: September 8, 2006 

Pre-Trial Conference Date: October 5, 2006 @ 1:30pm

(was 8/31/06 at 1:30pm) Judge Snyder

Jury Trial Date: November 13, 2006 @ 9:00am

(was 10/16/06 at 9:00am) Judge Snyder

The Settlement Conference date of September 14, 2006 at 10:00a.m. before Judge

Beck, remains the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 17, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06533-SMS Document 59 Filed 07/18/06 Page 3 of 3