Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00205/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00205-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

D. WOODFILL, et al. 

Defendants. 

No. 2:20-cv-0205 KJM AC P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By order filed March 11, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee and was 

cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

ECF No. 8. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s 

order or paid the filing fee. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

//// 

//// 

Case 2:20-cv-00205-KJM-AC Document 11 Filed 04/20/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: April 17, 2020 

Case 2:20-cv-00205-KJM-AC Document 11 Filed 04/20/20 Page 2 of 2