Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00340/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00340-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CRAIG REED,

Plaintiff,

v.

HINSHAW, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00340-GBC (PC)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO RESPOND TO

THE COURT’S ORDER REGARDING

CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR

REASSIGNMENT

(Doc. 2)

RESPONSE DUE IN 30 DAYS

On March 2, 2011, the court issued as Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment,

requiring plaintiff to complete and return the form within thirty (30) days, indicating either consent

to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Magistrate Judge, or requesting that the case be reassigned to a U.S.

District Judge. The thirty (30)-day period has expired, and petitioner has not returned the form, or

otherwise responded to the court's order.

Local Rule 110 provides that “failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these [Local]

Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all

sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Such sanctions can include dismissal of this

action. See In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA)ProductsLiability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226-27

(9th Cir. 2006).

///

///

///

1

Case 1:11-cv-00340-AWI-SAB Document 6 Filed 04/21/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date

of service of this order, petitioner shall complete and return the Order Re Consent or Request for

Reassignment, a copy of which is attached hereto, or show cause, in writing, why sanctions should

not be imposed for petitioner's failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 21, 2011 

0jh02o UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

2

Case 1:11-cv-00340-AWI-SAB Document 6 Filed 04/21/11 Page 2 of 2