Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01824/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01824-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________

[Proposed] Order on Motion to Dismiss Portion of 

of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint

Rosemary T. McGuire, Esq. Bar No. 172549

Erica M. Camarena, Esq. Bar No. 227981

THE LAW FIRM OF

WEAKLEY, RATLIFF,

ARENDT & McGUIRE, LLP

1630 East Shaw Avenue, Suite 176

Fresno, California 93710

Telephone: (559) 221-5256

Facsimile: (559) 221-5262

Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF FRESNO

and ALFRED CAMPOS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DONALD EDWARD ANDERSON, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF FRESNO - FRESNO POLICE

DEPARTMENT, ALFRED CAMPOS,

individually and In His Official Capacity as a

Police Officer for the City of Fresno, and

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01824-OWW-DLB

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS

MOTION DISMISS PORTIONS OF

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO STRIKE

PRAYER FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES 

Complaint Filed: 12/14/2006

Trial Date: 08/26/08

The motion of Defendants, CITY OF FRESNO and OFFICER ALFRED CAMPOS to

dismiss portions of plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and strike plaintiff’s prayer for punitive

damages against the City of Fresno was heard on July 9, 2007, before the Honorable Oliver W.

Wanger. Daniel Harrelson, Esq., appeared on behalf of plaintiff; Rosemary T. McGuire, Esq.,

appeared on behalf of defendants.

Having reviewed the papers submitted by the parties and heard the arguments of counsel,

the Court dismissed plaintiff’s Fifth Amendment claim, Eighth Amendment claim, and Fourteen

Amendment claim without leave to amend. Receiving no opposition to the motion to strike claim

for punitive damages as to the City of Fresno, that motion was granted.

Case 1:06-cv-01824-OWW -DLB Document 25 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________

[Proposed] Order on Motion to Dismiss Portion of 

of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint 2

Defendants have twenty (20) days to file an answer to plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 31, 2007

 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

United States District Court Judge

Oliver W. Wanger

Case 1:06-cv-01824-OWW -DLB Document 25 Filed 08/01/07 Page 2 of 2