Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01354/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01354-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAMIRO MUNOS GARZA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

UNKNOWN, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-CV-01354 OWW SMS HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #14]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241. 

On January 17, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for failure to obey a court order.

Specifically, Petitioner did not submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing

fee as ordered. It is further noted that Petitioner was ordered to do so on three occasions. On the third

and final occasion, Petitioner did not respond in any way. The Findings and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation

were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have

Case 1:06-cv-01354-OWW-SMS Document 15 Filed 03/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

passed and no party has filed objections or responded in any manner.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued January 17, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; 

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01354-OWW-SMS Document 15 Filed 03/14/07 Page 2 of 2