Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01818/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01818-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 1 - 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No.2:07 CV 01818 GEB DAD 

HATTON, PETRIE & STACKLER APC 

Attorneys at Law 

20281 Birch Street, Suite 100 

Newport Beach, CA 92660 

Telephone: (949) 474-4222 

g_hatton@hattonpetrie.com 

GREGORY M. HATTON [Cal. SBN 119810]

JOHN A. McMAHON [Cal. SBN 237261] 

Attorneys for plaintiff 

DAMERON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAMERON HOSPITAL 

ASSOCIATION, a California NonProfit Assocation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 

LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a California Corporation, 

et al. 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:07 CV 01818 GEB 

DAD 

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS

CLEARWIRE CORPORATION 

AND CLEARWIRE 

CORPORATION GROUP 

HEALTH PLAN TO ANSWER 

OR OTHERWISE PLEAD

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO ALL INTERESTED 

PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

Pursuant to Rule 6-144 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States 

District Court for the Eastern District of California (“Local Rules”), Plaintiff 

Dameron Hospital Association (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Clearwire Corporation 

and Clearwire Corporation Group Health Plan (“Defendants”), by and through 

Case 2:07-cv-01818-GEB-DAD Document 213 Filed 06/18/08 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No.2:07 CV 01818 GEB DAD 

 

their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to a thirty-day extension of time within 

which Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to the Second Amended 

Complaint filed by Plaintiff. Defendants have not previously been granted any 

extensions. 

Good cause exists for a thirty-day extension of time, such that a pleading 

filed on or before July 26, 2008 shall be deemed timely, because Defendants and 

Plaintiff are discussing settlement. A 30 day extension will facilitate these 

settlement discussions without unnecessary cost and expense being incurred by the 

parties hereto. 

As required by Local Rules 6-144 and 83-143, a proposed order is being 

filed concurrently herewith. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: __6/16/08____________ HATTON, PETRIE & STACKLER, APC 

 __________/s/___________________ 

 By: John A. McMahon 

Attorneys for DAMERON HOSPITAL 

ASSOCIATION 

DATED: ___6/17/08___________ DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP 

 __________/s/___________________ 

 By: Joseph E Addiego III 

Attorneys for CLEARWIRE 

CORPORATION and CLEARWIRE 

CORPORATION GROUP HEALTH 

PLAN 

 As authorized on 6/17/08 

Case 2:07-cv-01818-GEB-DAD Document 213 Filed 06/18/08 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No.2:07 CV 01818 GEB DAD 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAMERON HOSPITAL 

ASSOCIATION, a California NonProfit Assocation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 

LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a California Corporation, 

et al. 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:07 CV 01818 GEB 

DAD 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING THE TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS CLEARWIRE 

CORPORATION AND 

CLEARWIRE CORPORATION 

GROUP HEALTH PLAN TO 

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE 

PLEAD

The Court, having reviewed the stipulation between Plaintiff Dameron 

Hospital Association (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Clearwire Corporation and 

Clearwire Corporation Group Health Plan (“Defendants”) for a thirty-day 

Case 2:07-cv-01818-GEB-DAD Document 213 Filed 06/18/08 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 4 - 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No.2:07 CV 01818 GEB DAD 

 

extension of time within which Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to 

the Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff, and finding good cause 

therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ response shall now be due 

no later than July 26, 2008. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 18, 2008 

Case 2:07-cv-01818-GEB-DAD Document 213 Filed 06/18/08 Page 4 of 4