Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05615/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05615-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 25, 2017 

(CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05615-JST) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Andra Barmash Greene (CSB# 123931) 

agreene@irell.com 

A. Matthew Ashley (CSB# 198235) 

mashley@irell.com 

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400 

Newport Beach, California 92660 

Tel: (949) 760-0991 

Fax: (949) 760-5200 

Attorneys for Defendants, Uber Technologies Inc., et al. 

Tina Wolfson (CSB# 174806) 

twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com 

Robert Ahdoot (CSB# 172098) 

rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com 

Meredith S. Lierz (CSB# 296650) 

mlierz@ahdootwolfson.com 

AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 

1016 Palm Avenue 

West Hollywood, California 90069 

Tel: (310) 474-9111 

Fax: (310) 474-8585 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Matthew Philliben, et al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MATTHEW PHILLIBEN, JULIAN MENA, 

TODD SCHREIBER, NATE COOLIDGE, 

ERNESTO MEJIA, and BYRON MCKNIGHT, 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation, and RASIER, LLC, a Delaware 

Limited Liability Company, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 3:14-cv-05615-JST 

HON. JON S. TIGAR 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 25, 2017 

Case 3:14-cv-05615-JST Document 108 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 4
– 1 –

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 25, 2017 

(CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05615-JST) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT: 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Matthew Philliben, Julian Mena, Todd Schreiber, 

Nate Coolidge, Ernesto Mejia, and Byron McKnight (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Uber 

Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) (collectively with Plaintiffs, the 

“Parties”) provide this stipulation to inform the Court that they are continuing to mediate this dispute in 

an effort to address the issues raised in this Court’s denial of the Parties’ Motion for Preliminary 

Approval of Class Action Settlement (Dkt. 98). As a result, the Parties respectfully request that this 

Court continue the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for January 25, 2017, thirty (30) 

days in order to allow the Parties to continue their mediation and settlement efforts. 

By and through their respective counsel of record, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that 

the Court enter an Order as follows: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs commenced this action on January 6, 2015 [Dkt. 1]; 

WHEREAS, on February 11, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class 

Action Settlement (herein the “Motion”) [Dkt. 75-4]; 

WHEREAS, on August 30, 2016, the Court issued its Order Denying Motion For Preliminary 

Approval Of Class Action Settlement (herein the “Denial Order”) [Dkt. 98]; 

WHEREAS, since the date of the Denial Order, the Parties have been negotiating potential 

amendments to the settlement that would address each of the issues raised in the Denial Order; 

WHEREAS, the Parties participated in a full-day mediation on October 5, 2016, as well as a 

follow-up mediation on November 22, 2016, and another mediation on January 5, 2017; 

WHEREAS, the Parties are continuing to have settlement and mediation communications and 

the Parties are continuing to exchange and analyze information provided pursuant to the mediation in an 

attempt to address the issues this Court raised in its Denial Order; 

WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for January 25, 2017, and a 

Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due January 13, 2017 [Dkt. 106]; 

WHEREAS, no scheduling order has been entered and no trial date has been set for this case; 

Case 3:14-cv-05615-JST Document 108 Filed 01/19/17 Page 2 of 4
– 2 –

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 25, 2017 

 (CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05615-JST) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Parties, by and through their 

undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, agree and request that the Court enter an Order as follows: 

 1. Continuing the currently scheduled Case Management Conference thirty (30) days; or 

2. If the Court intends to keep the currently scheduled Case Management Conference date, 

permitting this Stipulation to constitute the Parties’ Joint Case Management Conference Statement; and 

3. That discovery remains stayed. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 13, 2017 AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 

By: /s/ Robert Ahdoot 

Tina Wolfson 

Robert Ahdoot 

Counsel for Plaintiffs Matthew Philliben, Julian Mena, Todd 

Schreiber, Nate Coolidge, Ernesto Mejia and Byron 

McKnight

Dated: January 13, 2017 IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

By: /s/ A. Matthew Ashley 

 Andra Barmash Greene 

 A. Matthew Ashley 

 

Counsel for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, 

LLC

Case 3:14-cv-05615-JST Document 108 Filed 01/19/17 Page 3 of 4
– 3 –

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 25, 2017 

 (CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05615-JST) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Parties’ January 13, 2017 Stipulation, the Court: 

(1) Orders that the Case Management Conference presently set for January 25, 2017 at 2:00 

p.m. be continued to ______________________, 2017 at ______ p.m.; and 

 (2) Orders that discovery shall remain stayed. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

DATED: __________________ _____________________________________ 

 Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

 United States District Court Judge 

 

The Court does not anticipate granting any future continuances. February 22 2:00 January 19, 2017

Case 3:14-cv-05615-JST Document 108 Filed 01/19/17 Page 4 of 4