Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02166/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02166-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Timothy Bryan Brooks,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 02-2166 MCE PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

California Department of

Corrections, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoFebruary 9, 2005, plaintiff filed a paper styled, “Motion to

issue 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Complaint.” 

Plaintiff contends the court should enter judgment in

plaintiff’s favor because defendants neither objected to the

January 11, 2005, findings and recommendations to deny their

motion to dismiss nor answered the complaint. 

Defendants served their motion to dismiss, objections to the

findings and recommendation and answer upon plaintiff at Deuel

Vocational Institute, where plaintiff was confined when he

Case 2:02-cv-02166-MCE -EFB Document 33 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

commenced his action. While the second-amended complaint, which

was served on defendants, showed plaintiff was confined at

Susanville State Penitentiary, plaintiff did not comply with

Local Rule 83-183(b) by filing notice of his new address. 

Despite plaintiff’s omission, he acknowledges he received

defendants’ answer. 

Accordingly, plaintiff’s February 9, 2005, motion should be

denied.

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: June 2, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:02-cv-02166-MCE -EFB Document 33 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2