Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01664/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01664-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STV ASIA, LTD.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PRN CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

Case No. C-06-1664 JCS

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS [Docket No. 116] AND

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Docket No. 117]

On October 17, 2006, Defendants’ filed a Rule 11 Motion Regarding Plaintiff’s Failure To

Conduct An Adequate Pre-Filing Investigation, and a Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement (the “Motions”).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED without prejudice to re-noticing

the Motions to be heard on May 11, 2007, at 9:30 a.m. The hearing date of December 1, 2006 at

9:30 a.m., has been taken off calendar.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet-and-confer to discuss a

briefing schedule on the re-noticed Motions with the last brief to be filed no later than April 13,

2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 9, 2006

_______________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01664-JCS Document 130 Filed 11/09/06 Page 1 of 1