Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04794/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04794-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ALTERA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-04794-BLF 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

STIPULATED MOTION TO RELATE 

CASES

[Re: ECF 22]

Plaintiff Altera Corporation moves to relate the above-captioned case with another case, 

Xilinx, Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, 14-cv-4963-RS. All parties to both actions 

stipulate that the cases are related. See ECF 22-1 at 2. 

The Court, however, DENIES Plaintiff’s request to relate the cases because the 

undersigned would be forced to recuse herself in Xilinx. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 13, 2015

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-04794-LHK Document 23 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 1