Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03235/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03235-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2003\3235\orderrecorrection.wpd

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ULTRATECH, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

TAMARACK SCIENTIFIC CO.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 03-03235 CRB

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is Tamarack’s motion to correct clerical error in the

Court’s May 17, 2005 Memorandum and Order. After carefully reviewing the Order, the

Court concludes that it made an error in its conclusion. The Court did not intend to hold as a

matter of law that the ‘813 is not invalid as obvious in light of Ultratech’s response to IBM’s

RFQ. Accordingly, Tamarack’s motion is GRANTED and paragraph 5 of page 20 of the

May 17, 2005 order is amended to read as follows: “Ultratech’s motion for summary

judgment on Tamarack’s obviousness defense based on Kurosawa et al. and the devices

Tamarack sold to IBM is DENIED; in all other respects the motion is dismissed as moot.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 13, 2005

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-03235-CRB Document 643 Filed 07/13/05 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2003\3235\orderrecorrection.wpd 2

Case 3:03-cv-03235-CRB Document 643 Filed 07/13/05 Page 2 of 2