Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01129/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01129-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

{01368351.DOC}

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT

Sanjay S. Schmidt, SBN 247475

1686 Second Street, Suite 219

Livermore, CA 94550

TEL: (925) 215-7733

FAX: (925) 455-2486

Attorney for Plaintiff

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

Attorney for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSE FELIX ORTIZ LEON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF MERCED, a municipal corporation, 

MERCED POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER 

BRYAN SAELEE, Individually, MERCED 

POLICE DEPARTMENT CHIEF NORM 

ANDRADE, in his Official Capacity, and DOES 

1 THROUGH 50, Jointly and Severally,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:14-CV-01129-GEB-SAB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Date: March 16, 2015

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Dept: 10

Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

Second Amended Filed: January 19, 2015

/

///

///

///

///

Case 1:14-cv-01129-GEB-SAB Document 30 Filed 02/24/15 Page 1 of 2
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

{01368351.DOC}

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties herein, by and through their attorneys of record, agree and stipulate to continue 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint currently set for 

March 16, 2015 to April 17, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. The opposition and 

reply to the Motion to Dismiss will coincide with the hearing date of April 17, 2015, and the opposition 

will be due on April 3, 2015 and the reply will be due on April 10, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: February 24, 2015 LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT

 /s/ Sanjay S. Schmidt (as authorized on 02.23.15)1 

SANJAY S. SCHMIDT

Attorney for Plaintiff 

JOSE FELIX ORTIZ LEON

Dated: February 24, 2015 PORTER SCOTT

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

/s/ John R. Whitefleet________________

John R. Whitefleet

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF MERCED, BRYAN 

SAELEE and NORM ANDRADE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is continued to April 17, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the opposition will be due on April 3, 2015 and the reply 

will be due on April 10, 2015; 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 24, 2015

 

1

Per Local Rule 131(e), approval has been obtained to submit this document on counsel’s behalf.

Case 1:14-cv-01129-GEB-SAB Document 30 Filed 02/24/15 Page 2 of 2