Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02471/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02471-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FLOR BARRAZA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CRICKET WIRELESS LLC,

Defendant. /

No. C 15-02471 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO

HAC VICE APPLICATION OF

ATTORNEY REX SHARP

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Rex Sharp (Dkt. No. 11) is DENIED for failing

to comply with Civil Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he

or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest

court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). 

Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the

state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Texas” — is inadequate under the local rule

because it fails to identify a specific court (such as the Supreme Court of Texas). While the

application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a

corrected form is submitted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 17, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-02471-WHA Document 15 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 1