Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02450/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02450-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

{00631757.DOCX } 1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT 

JOHN M. SORICH (CA Bar No. 125223) 

john.sorich@piblaw.com 

JAMES M. SABOVICH (CA Bar No. 218488) 

james.sabovich@piblaw.com 

PARKER IBRAHIM & BERG LLC 

695 Town Center Drive, 16th Floor 

Costa Mesa, California 92626 

Tel: (714) 361-9550 

Fax: (714) 784-4190 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

RICHARD F. BELL and PATRICIA A. BELL, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; a business 

entity form unknown; SELECT PORTFOLIO 

SERVICING, INC., a business entity form 

unknown; MTC FINANCIAL, INC. dba 

TRUSTEE CORPS, a business entity form 

unknown; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No: 2:16-cv-02450-JAM-DB

JUDGE: Hon. John A. Mendez

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

ACTION FILED: September 13, 2016 

REMOVED: October 13, 2016 

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

Having considered the joint stipulation between plaintiffs Richard F. Bell and Patricia A. 

Bell (“Plaintiffs”) and defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”), and collectively, the 

“Parties,” and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Stipulation of the Parties to continue the deadline for Defendant to file a 

responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ Complaint in this action is granted. 

Case 2:16-cv-02450-JAM-DB Document 8 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

{00631757.DOCX } 2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT 

2. Defendant’s response to the Complaint is due on or before November 21, 2016. 

3. All related deadlines shall also be continued accordingly. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 10/20/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ 

 Hon. John A. Mendez 

 United States District Court Judge

Case 2:16-cv-02450-JAM-DB Document 8 Filed 10/20/16 Page 2 of 2