Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01417/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01417-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

WALL, WALL & PEAKE

 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

 1601 "F" STREET

BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93303-2507

 TELEPHONE: (661) 327-8461

Larry F. Peake, SBN 082626

Attorney for Defendants City of McFarland, 

City of Delano, and City of Wasco 

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION

MARY G. LOPEZ, individually and as

Successor-In-Interest on behalf of

Decedent, SALVADOR V. LOPEZ;

SALVADOR M. LOPEZ, individually and

as Successor-In-Interest on behalf of

Decedent, SALVADOR V. LOPEZ;

OSVALDO RENE LOPEZ, a minor by

and through Guardian ad Litem, MARY G.

LOPEZ; TOMMY GREGORY LOPEZ, a

minor, by and through Guardian ad Litem,

MARY G. LOPEZ; and MEGHIN

LEANNE LOPEZ, a minor, by and through

Guardian ad Litem, MARY G. LOPEZ 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER

CORPORATION (AMTRAK); STATE OF

CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

(CALTRANS); COUNTY OF KERN;

CITY OF DELANO; CITY OF

McFARLAND; CITY OF WASCO; and

Does 1 through 200, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 1:07-CV-01417-OWW-GSA

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF

CITIES OF DELANO, McFARLAND,

AND WASCO AND JUDGMENT

THEREON (DISMISSALS WITH

PREJUDICE)

The Plaintiff in this action, by and through its undersigned attorney; and the Cities

of Delano, McFarland, and Wasco, by and through their undersigned attorney; hereby agree, in

Case 1:07-cv-01417-OWW -GSA Document 35 Filed 04/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

judgment shall by stipulation be entered thereon by said parties, that the Plaintiff’s Complaint

in this action shall be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, as to the City of Delano; City of

McFarland; and City of Wasco with each party to assume their own attorney’s fees and costs of

any type or nature.

Further, in conjunction with such dismissal with prejudice of the three aforementioned

Defendants (Cities of Delano, McFarland and Wasco), and by and through the stipulation by

Plaintiff and said Cities by and through their respective attorneys, in good cause appearing

therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s action against the Cities of Delano, McFarland, and Wasco as

Defendants in this action are hereby dismissed with prejudice;

2. Each party shall assume their own attorney’s fees and costs of any type or nature

in conjunction with said dismissal with prejudice and stipulation by the parties;

and

3. Judgment shall be entered by the Court dismissing this action as to the City of

Delano, City of McFarland, and City of Wasco.

DATED: April 4, 2008 WALL, WALL & PEAKE

 By: 

LARRY F. PEAKE, Attorneys for Defendants

City of McFarland, City of Delano, and 

City of Wasco

DATED: March ____, 2008 By:_____________________________________

JUAN CARLOS VICTORIA, Attorneys for

Plaintiff Mary Lopez

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 4, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01417-OWW -GSA Document 35 Filed 04/04/08 Page 2 of 2