Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06406/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06406-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOROTHY MARIE WILLARD, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

)

___________________________________ )

CV F 04-6406 OWW WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE

PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS

[Doc. 10]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241. 

On August 9, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that

the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED. These Findings and Recommendation

were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within

thirty days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty days have passed and no party has

Case 1:04-cv-06406-OWW -WMW Document 12 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1The court notes that the copy of the findings and recommendations served on Petitioner

was returned by the United States Postal Service with the notation “attempted - not known” The

copy, however, was served on Petitioner at her address of record and pursuant to Local Rule 83-

182(e) such service is fully effective. 

2

filed objections.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this court has

conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court

finds that the Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued August 9, 2005, are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to

close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06406-OWW -WMW Document 12 Filed 09/26/05 Page 2 of 2