Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02732/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02732-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATES RE 

CLAIM CONSTR. DISCLOSURES & DISCOVERY 

CASE NO. CV 05-02732 CRB 

LACA_743731.1 

E. Patrick Ellisen (State Bar No. 142033) 

Stephen M. Lobbin (State Bar No. 181195) 

Debra D. Nye (State Bar No. 226076) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

1530 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125 

Telephone: 650.856.3700 

Facsimile: 650.856.3710 

Attorneys for Plaintiff PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC. 

Kenneth E. Keller (State Bar No. 71450) 

Michael D. Lisi (State Bar No. 196974) 

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLY & ROMAN LLP 

114 Sansome Street, 4th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415.249.8330 

Facsimile: 415.249.8333 

Attorneys for Defendant PANOPTX, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC., a California 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

PANOPTX, INC., a California corporation, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV 05-02732 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EXTENDING DATES FOR CLAIM

CONSTRUCTION DISCLOSURES AND

DISCOVERY UNDER LOCAL PATENT RULES

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 37 Filed 06/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATES RE 

CLAIM CONSTR. DISCLOSURES & DISCOVERY 

CASE NO. CV 05-02732 CRB 

LACA_743731.1 

Pursuant to Rules 7-11 and 7-12 of the Civil Local Rules of the Northern District of California, 

the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that this Court enter an Order extending certain 

deadlines related to the parties’ disclosures and discovery for patent claim construction issues. This 

Stipulation is made because the parties require additional time to prepare their disclosures and conduct 

discovery related to claim construction. This extension does not affect the deadlines for submission of 

the parties’ claim construction briefs or the September 7, 2006 date for the Claim Construction Hearing. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties and subject to this 

Court’s approval, that the dates originally set under the Local Patent Rules shall be extended as follows: 

CURRENT 

DATE

REVISED 

DATE

EVENT

6/12/06 7/7/06 Exchange of Preliminary Claim Construction 

and Extrinsic Evidence (PLR 4-2) 

6/16/06 7/14/06 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing 

Statement (PLR 4-3) 

7/17/06 7/31/06 Claim Construction Discovery Cutoff (PLR 4-4) 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: June 9, 2006 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

/s/ Stephen M. Lobbin 

Stephen M. Lobbin 

Attorneys for Plaintiff PROTECTIVE OPTICS, INC.

Dated: June 9, 2006 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLY & ROMAN LLP 

/s/ Michael D. Lisi 

Michael D. Lisi 

Attorneys for Defendant PANOPTX, INC.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________________, 2006 

Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Judge 

June 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02732-CRB Document 37 Filed 06/14/06 Page 2 of 2