Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02054/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02054-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAL BHATIA; JANE DOE, a Minor,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STEPHEN CORRIGAN; DOES 1-100,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 07-2054 CW

ORDER DISMISSING

JANE DOE’S CLAIMS

On February 5, 2008, the Court ordered Plaintiff Lal Bhatia to

identify three nominees to serve as guardian ad litem for his

daughter, Jane Doe, by February 11, 2008. The order informed

Plaintiff that if he did not comply, Jane Doe’s claims would be

dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff

did not comply with the order, but instead filed a declaration by

his attorney consenting to the dismissal of his daughter’s claims. 

Accordingly, those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Because all claims have now been disposed of, the clerk shall

enter judgment against Plaintiff dismissing his constitutional

claims with prejudice; dismissing his tort claims without

Case 4:07-cv-02054-CW Document 59 Filed 02/15/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

prejudice; and dismissing Jane Doe’s claims without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 2/15/08 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:07-cv-02054-CW Document 59 Filed 02/15/08 Page 2 of 2