Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01123/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01123-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAUL GONZALEZ, CASE NO. CV-F-05-1123 AWI LJO

Plaintiff, ORDER TO ADOPT FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

vs. ACTION

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION

SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Raul Gonzalez (“plaintiff”) is incarcerated and proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis

in this civil rights. On August 8, 2005, plaintiff filed his complaint in the U.S. District Court, Northern

District of California, and plaintiff’s action was transferred to this Court. The complaint’s caption lists

as defendants U.S. Inmigration (sic) & Naturalization Services, J. Krahser and Associates. The portion

of the complaint to list defendants includes J. Krasher, supervisor and officers #1-3 of Fresno

Inmigration (sic) & Naturalization Services.

The complaint alleges:

On Jan. 2000 Mr. J. Krasher & Associates invaded my aunts (sic) apt w/out permission

violating every constitutional right discriminating, harrassing & threatening my mom

accusing her of harboring a fugitive “me.” I was arrested! Denied my right to due

Case 1:05-cv-01123-AWI-LJO Document 16 Filed 11/02/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

process of law. “No Miranda rights.” Was forced & threatened by force to sign &

surrender fingerprints.

The complaint further alleges that Mr. J. Krasher was searching for plaintiff’s mother at the home of

plaintiff’s sister.

For relief, the complaint seeks respect for plaintiff’s constitutional rights “as well as my family

to be at peace in their homes.”

The magistrate judge issued September 14, 2005 findings and recommendations to dismiss this

action without prejudice on grounds the complaint fails to satisfy pleading requirements, fails to state

viable claims against defendants, and an attempt at amendment is unwarranted based on the complaint’s

deficiencies, immunities and defenses available to defendants, and plaintiff’s apparent attempt to vex

defendants. The findings and recommendations granted plaintiff to October 19, 2005 to file written

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

On October 19, 2005, Plaintiff filed objections.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court conducted a de novo review of this case. After

evaluating the record, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations are

supported by the record and proper analysis. Petitioner’s objections do not provide a ground to not

adopt the Findings and Recommendations. As explained by the Magistrate Judge, Petitioner does not

have standing to assert alleged violations of the constitutional rights of his family members. In addition,

the alleged violations of Plaintiff’s rights occurred in 2000 and 2001. The statute of limitations has run

on any alleged violations that occurred in 2000 and 2001. 

Accordingly, this Court:

1. ADOPTS in full the Magistrate Judge’s September 14, 2005 Findings and

Recommendations;

2. DISMISSES this entire action without prejudice on grounds the complaint fails to satisfy

pleading requirements, fails to state viable claims against defendants, and an attempt at

amendment is unwarranted based on the complaint’s deficiencies, immunities and

defenses available to defendants, and plaintiff’s apparent attempt to vex defendants; and

Case 1:05-cv-01123-AWI-LJO Document 16 Filed 11/02/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

3. DIRECTS this Court’s clerk to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01123-AWI-LJO Document 16 Filed 11/02/05 Page 3 of 3