Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01000/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01000-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLEVELAND WALLACE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BUCKINGHAM PROPERTY 

MANAGEMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-1000 TLN CKD PS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. In the initial complaint, plaintiffs alleged 

only state law claims and alleged diversity as the basis of subject matter jurisdiction. Because the 

parties are not diverse, plaintiffs were ordered to show cause why the action should not be 

dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In response, plaintiffs filed an amended 

complaint in which plaintiffs allege that defendants have engaged in unauthorized electronic 

surveillance in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Wiretap Act). A private right of action is conferred 

under that Act. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511(1)(a), 2520. 

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:16-cv-01000-TLN-CKD Document 10 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order to show cause (ECF No. 4) is 

discharged. 

Dated: June 27, 2016

4 wallace1000.osc.dis

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-01000-TLN-CKD Document 10 Filed 06/27/16 Page 2 of 2