Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06493/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06493-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06 6493 WHA 

LEGAL_US_W # 55230588.2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT AN EXTENSION TO JANUARY 19, 2007 TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

NANCY L. ABELL (SB# 88785) 

LISA G. LAWSON (SB# 169503) 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

515 South Flower Street 

Twenty-Fifth Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228 

Telephone: (213) 683-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ORACLE CORPORATION 

CHRISTINA DJERNAES (SB# 177522) 

LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTINA DJERNAES 

1215 De La Vina Street, Ste. K 

Santa Barbara, CA 93101 

Telephone: (805) 685-8189 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MADHAV KAKANI, GENNADY BRIN 

and RANJIV JAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MADHAV KAKANI, GENNADY 

BRIN and RANJIV JAIN, on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ORACLE CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 06 6493 WHA 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AN 

EXTENSION TO JANUARY 19, 2007 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Complaint Filed: October 17, 2006 

WHEREAS, the Complaint in this case was filed on October 17, 2006, but 

was not served until November 16, 2006; and 

Case 3:06-cv-06493-WHA Document 6 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:06-cv-06493-WHA Document 7 Filed 12/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06 6493 WHA 

-2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT AN EXTENSION TO JANUARY 19, 2007 TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

LEGAL US W # 55230588 2

WHEREAS, this case is a purported nationwide class and collective action 

that alleges seven separate claims for relief; and 

WHEREAS, Defendant needs additional time to investigate the allegations 

of the Complaint and the defenses in the Answer to competently respond to the 101 

paragraphs of allegations regarding current and former employees around the country; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED 

among the parties, through their attorneys, that Defendant shall have an extension of time, 

through and including January 19, 2007, within which to file a responsive pleading to the 

Complaint.

Dated: December 4, 2006 /s/ 

Christina Djernaes 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: December 4, 2006 /s/ 

Nancy L. Abell 

Attorney for Defendant 

ORDER

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: December __, 2006 

 Honorable William Alsup 

 Judge, United States District Court 

Case 3:06-cv-06493-WHA Document 6 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 2 of 2

5

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:06-cv-06493-WHA Document 7 Filed 12/05/06 Page 2 of 2