Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02661/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02661-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL GARZA,

CASE NO. 5:15-CV-02661-RMW

Plaintiff(s),

v.

BRINDERSON CONSTRUCTORS,

INC.; BRINDERSON L.P., INC. and

CHEVRON, INC. ,

Defendant(s).

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

D Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

D Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

0 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-S)

Private Process:

~ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private mediation.

Provider to be selected b,~parties at a future date.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

D the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

~ other requested deadline 180 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process.

Dated: 08/31/2015

Dated: 08/31/2015

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California,

I attest that I have concurrence in the filling of this document.

/s/ Shaun Setareh

Attorney for Plaintiff

Shaun Setareh

lsl Lisa M. Bertain

Attorney for Defendant

Lisa M. Bertain

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE NDC-ADR6

(),/('

Case 5:15-cv-02661-RMW Document 18 Filed 09/09/15 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER

0 The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

0 The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

RONALD M. WHYTE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket

Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."

Rev. 12/ I i

Page 2 of 2

;

Case 5:15-cv-02661-RMW Document 18 Filed 09/09/15 Page 2 of 2