Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Hassan A. Zavareei (SBN 181547)

hzavareei@tzlegal.com

Andrea R. Gold (admitted pro hac vice)

agold@tzlegal.com

Andrew J. Silver (admitted pro hac vice)

asilver@tzlegal.com

TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

1828 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000

Washington, DC 20036

Tel.: (202) 973-0900

Fax: (202) 973-0950

Kristen Law Sagafi (SBN 222249)

ksagafi@tzlegal.com

TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

483 Ninth Street, Suite 200

Oakland, CA 94607

Tel.: (510) 907-7255

Fax: (202) 973-0950

Attorneys for Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan 

Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin 

Bartolet

Sarah J. Crooks (admitted pro hac vice)

SCrooks@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

1120 NW Couch Street, 10th Floor

Portland, OR 97209

Tel.: (503) 727-2252

Fax: (503) 346-2252

Debra R. Bernard (admitted pro hac vice)

dbernard@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

131 South Dearborn, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60603

Tel.: (312) 324-8559

Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES LATHROP, JONATHAN 

GRINDELL, SANDEEP PAL, JENNIFER 

REILLY, and JUSTIN BARTOLET on 

behalf of themselves and all others 

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-05678-JST

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ 

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 195 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin 

Bartolet (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and 

through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on June 7, 2016, Plaintiffs sought leave of the Court to file a Third Amended 

Complaint (Dkt. No. 177); 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:

Subject to Court approval, the Third Amended Complaint1 shall be deemed filed, pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), on the date that the Court enters its Order pursuant to this 

Stipulation;

Defendant may file its responsive pleading within 30 days of the filing of the Third 

Amended Complaint. If Defendant chooses to answer the Third Amended Complaint, Defendant 

need only respond to the new allegations, with Defendant’s current Answer [Dkt. No. 56]

answering the previously-pled allegations;

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Defer Court’s Consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment Until After The Order on Class Certification (Dkt. No. 172) and Defendant’s Motion 

for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 146) shall not be mooted, delayed, or otherwise impacted by 

the filing of the Third Amended Complaint, but the parties may file corrected versions of these 

two motions with references to the Third Amended Complaint within 7 days of the Court’s Order 

pursuant to this Stipulation;

Neither party will rely on the filing of the Third Amended Complaint as a basis to request 

modification of any of the deadlines in the current Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 153); and

Should it so choose, Defendant may seek to reopen the depositions of Plaintiffs Lathrop, 

Grindell, Reilly, and Bartolet. However, any new examination must be limited only to the issues 

raised by the amendments to the Second Amended Complaint. Should they occur, said 

 1 Corrected versions—both in redline and final—of the Third Amended Complaint stipulated to 

by the Parties are attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively. The previously filed Third 

Amended Complaint (Dkt Nos. 177-3 and 177-4) contains an unintentional deletion of paragraphs 

75-87, which has been remedied in the attached exhibits. 

The plaintiff shall file the Third Amended Complaint within 3 days of this Order;

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 195 Filed 06/22/16 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

depositions must be conducted either via teleconference or videoconference, or in person in the 

town in which each aforementioned Plaintiff resides at the time of the deposition.

DATED: June 21, 2016 TYCKO AND ZAVAREEI, LLP

By: /s/ Hassan A. Zavareei

Hassan A. Zavareei, Bar No. 181547

hzavareei@tzlegal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED: June 21, 2016 PERKINS COIE LLP

By: /s/ Sarah Crooks

Sarah Crooks (admitted pro hac vice)

scrooks@perkinscoie.com

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 195 Filed 06/22/16 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

The Honorable Jon S. Tigar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

June 22, 2016

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 195 Filed 06/22/16 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-5-

FILER’S ATTESTATION

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned 

attests that all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation.

DATED: June 21, 2016 TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

By: /s/ Hassan A. Zavareei

Hassan A. Zavareei, Bar No. 181547

hzavareei@tzlegal.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 195 Filed 06/22/16 Page 5 of 5