Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-16-07059/USCOURTS-caDC-16-07059-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 16-7059 September Term, 2016

1:14-cv-00140-TSC

Filed On: February 16, 2017

Melvin Brown,

Appellant

v.

Sandra Hill, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Henderson, Brown, and Pillard, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and appendices filed by the parties. See

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and

the motion for appointment of counsel, it is

ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the case be remanded for the

district court to determine whether appellant should have been allowed to file the

second amended complaint that is attached to his brief and, if so, for further

proceedings concerning the complaint. The second amended complaint was stamped

“received” by the clerk of the district and bankruptcy courts on November 24, 2015, but,

for reasons unclear, it does not appear on the district court’s docket.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

USCA Case #16-7059 Document #1661585 Filed: 02/16/2017 Page 1 of 1