Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-01502/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-01502-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

S

C

def

po

be 

su

file

Da

EAN O'TOO

v. 

CITY OF AN

On De

fendant No

rtion of the 

restored to

Before

bmit a resp

e a respons

IT IS S

ated: Dece

N

OLE, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

NTIOCH, et 

Defendan

cember 8, 2

orman Wiels

agreed-up

o the court’s

 ruling on p

ponse. Defe

se to plaintif

SO ORDER

mber 10, 20

UNITED 

NORTHER

,

al., 

ts. 

2015, plain

sch. Plaint

on conside

s calendar 

plaintiffs’ req

endant Wie

ffs’ request

RED. 

015 

STATES D

RN DISTRIC

tiffs filed a 

iffs explain 

eration for s

and set for 

quest, the c

elsch shall h

. 

__

PH

Un

DISTRICT C

CT OF CAL

Case No.

ORDER R

DISMISSA

request to 

that defend

settlement, a

r trial. 

court prefer

have until M

__________

HYLLIS J. H

nited States

COURT 

LIFORNIA 

11-cv-1502

RE REQUE

AL 

prevent dis

dant Wielsc

and thus re

rs to have d

Monday, De

__________

HAMILTON

s District Ju

2-PJH 

ST TO PRE

smissal aga

ch has not 

equests tha

defendant W

ecember 1

__________

udge 

EVENT 

ainst 

remitted his

at the matte

Wielsch 

4, 2015 to 

_______ 

s

r 

Case 4:11-cv-01502-PJH Document 231 Filed 12/10/15 Page 1 of 1