Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01132/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01132-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 In a Findings and Recommendations issued concurrently with this order, the court recommended that 1

plaintiff’s excessive force claim against any defendant other than Correa, and plaintiff’s due process, conspiracy, and

state law tort claims be dismissed from this action, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may

be granted; and defendants Rios, Morales, Tyson, Smith, and Gricewich be dismissed from this action based on

plaintiff’s failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted against them. 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO FAHIE,

Plaintiff,

v.

H. TYSON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01132-AWI-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF AMENDED

COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE, AND

FORWARDING SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO

PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND

RETURN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. 9)

Plaintiff Antonio Fahie (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on August

25, 2006. On October 13, 2006, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). The

court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and finds that it states

a cognizable claim for relief under section 1983 against defendant Correa for use of excessive force,

in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 1

U.S. 506, 512-15 (2002); Austin v. Terhune, 367 F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2004); Jackson v. Carey,

353 F.3d 750, 754 (9th Cir. 2003); Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara, 307 F.3d 1119, 1125-26 (9th

Cir. 2002). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

///

Case 1:06-cv-01132-GSA Document 15 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendant:

C/O N. CORREA

2. The Clerk of the Courtshall send plaintiff one (1) USM-285 form, one (1) summons,

a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

amended complaint filed October 13, 2006.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Two (2) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed October 16, 2006.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendant and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendant pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 10, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01132-GSA Document 15 Filed 04/10/07 Page 2 of 2