Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00198/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00198-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 In a Findings and Recommendations issued concurrently with this order, the court recommended that 1

plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical care claim against defendant Madrigal, and defendant Madrigal, be dismissed

from this action for failure to state a claim.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVON E. McCOY,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. SPIDLE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00198-AWI-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

APPROPRIATE, AND FORWARDING

SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR

COMPLETION AND RETURN WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. 1)

Plaintiff Davon E. McCoy (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on

February 6, 2007. The court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and

found that it states cognizable claims for relief under section 1983 against (1) defendants Spidle,

Perry, Doyle, Dreith, Does 1 through 3, Dangler, Watson, Stockman, Buckley, Garza, Allen, and

Samaya for denial of due process, (2) defendant Dangler for retaliation, and (3) defendants

Garcia, McNamara, Tomlin, Kee, Rubacalaba, Poblete, Reyes, Renoso, Gonzales, Compos, and

Morales for acting with deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s serious medical needs. Fed. R. Civ. 1

P. 8(a); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 512-15 (2002); Austin v. Terhune, 367

F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2004); Jackson v. Carey, 353 F.3d 750, 754 (9th Cir. 2003); Galbraith

v. County of Santa Clara, 307 F.3d 1119, 1125-26 (9th Cir. 2002). 

Case 1:07-cv-00198-SMM Document 12 Filed 08/28/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

SPIDLE

PERRY

DOYLE

DREITH

DANGLER

WATSON

STOCKMAN

BUCKLEY

GARZA

ALLEN

SAMAYA

GARCIA

McNAMARA

TOMLIN

KEE

RUBACALABA

POBLETE

REYES

RENOSO

GONZALES

COMPOS

MORALES

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff twenty-two (22) USM-285 forms,

twenty-two (2) summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an

instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed February 6, 2007.

///

Case 1:07-cv-00198-SMM Document 12 Filed 08/28/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to

the court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Twenty-three (23) copies of the endorsed complaint filed February 6,

2007. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 27, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00198-SMM Document 12 Filed 08/28/07 Page 3 of 3