Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-00448/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-00448-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 05-CV-0448-B (AJB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTICANCER, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

XENOGEN CORP., ET AL.,

Defendants.

_________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No: 05-CV-0448-B(AJB)

ORDER (1) DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE ANTICANCER’S EX

PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN

ORDER PERMITTING

ANTICANCER’S PRIOR,

DISQUALIFIED COUNSEL TO

PROVIDE A DECLARATION

OPPOSING XENOGEN’S

MOTION FOR RULE 11

SANCTIONS; AND (2) GRANTING

ANTICANCER’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER

CONTINUING THE HEARING ON

XENOGEN’S MOTION FOR RULE

11 SANCTIONS

Before the Court is Plaintiff AntiCancer Inc.’s (“AntiCancer”) Ex Parte Application,

filed on February 23, 2007, for an order (1) permitting AntiCancer’s prior, disqualified

counsel to provide a declaration opposing Defendant Xenogen Corp.’s (“Xenogen”)

Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions; and (2) continuing the hearing on Xenogen’s Motion for

Case 3:05-cv-00448-JLS-AJB Document 182 Filed 03/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 05-CV-0448-B (AJB)

Rule 11 Sanctions. (Doc. No. 180.) Xenogen’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions is currently

set for hearing before this Court on March 19, 2007. Richard Clegg, counsel for

AntiCancer, filed a Notice of Substitution to substitute into the case as AntiCancer’s new

counsel on February 16, 2007. (Doc. No. 179.) AntiCancer requests the hearing for

Xenogen’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions be continued to April 16, 2007, when the parties

already have a hearing scheduled before this Court for Xenogen’s Motion to Strike

Amended Complaint and For More Definite Statement Regarding AntiCancer, Inc’s Third

Amended Complaint. 

The Court hereby (1) DENIES without prejudice AntiCancer’s Ex Parte Application

for an order permitting AntiCancer’s prior, disqualified counsel to provide a declaration

opposing Xenogen’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions; and (2) GRANTS AntiCancer’s Ex

Parte Application for an order continuing the hearing on Xenogen’s Motion for Rule 11

Sanctions to April 16, 2007, at 2:00 P.M.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: March 1, 2007

Hon. Rudi M. Brewster

United States Senior District Court Judge

cc: Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia

 United States Magistrate Judge

 All Counsel of Record

Case 3:05-cv-00448-JLS-AJB Document 182 Filed 03/01/07 Page 2 of 2