Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03125/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03125-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

1 Case No. C 03-03125 (MMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY AND CONTINUING 

HEARING ON SANCTIONS MOTION 

SF/21682135.1 

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP 

ALFRED C. PFEIFFER, JR. (SBN 120965) 

RANDY MICHELSON (SBN 114095) 

KRISTEN A. PALUMBO (SBN 215857) 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 

Telephone: 415.393.2000 

Facsimile: 415.393.2286 

Attorneys for INDIVOS CORPORATION and 

SOLIDUS NETWORKS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

EXCEL INNOVATIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INDIVOS CORPORATION, SOLIDUS 

NETWORKS, INC., and DOES 1 TO 100, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. C 03-03125 (MMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO 

CHANGE DATE TO FILE REPLY 

AND TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SANCTIONS AGAINST EXCEL 

INNOVATIONS, INC. AND NED 

HOFFMAN 

INDIVOS CORPORATION and SOLIDUS 

NETWORKS, INC., 

Counterclaimants/ 

Counterdefendants, 

v. 

EXCEL INNOVATIONS, INC., NED 

HOFFMAN, and AVIV LLC, 

Counterdefendants/ 

Counterclaimants. 

Case 3:03-cv-03125 Document 352 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:03-cv-03125-MMC Document 354 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

2 Case No. C 03-03125 (MMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY AND CONTINUING 

HEARING ON SANCTIONS MOTION 

SF/21682135.1 

The Court, having reviewed Defendants’ Request to Change Date to File Reply 

and to Continue Hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions Against Excel Innovations, Inc. 

and Ned Hoffman (“Defendants’ Request”) and the papers submitted therewith, and good cause 

appearing therefor, hereby ORDERS as follows: 

1. Defendants’ Request IS GRANTED. 

2. On or before September 15, 2006, Excel Innovations, Inc. and Ned 

Hoffman shall file their oppositions to Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions Against Excel 

Innovations, Inc. and Ned Hoffman (“Sanctions Motion”); 

3. On or before September 29, 2006, Defendants shall file their reply in 

support of the Sanctions Motion; 

4. The hearing on the Sanctions Motion is continued from October 20, 2006 

to October 27, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the Court can conveniently hear the 

matter. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________ ________________________________ 

Hon. Joseph C. Spero 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-03125 Document 352 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 2 of 2

8/24/6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:03-cv-03125-MMC Document 354 Filed 08/24/06 Page 2 of 2