Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01611/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01611-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

568209.2

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING 

JURISDICTIONAL BRIEFING AND DISCOVERY

NO. C-02-1611 PJH

Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064)

Peter E. Leckman (State Bar No. 235721)

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, 30th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-3339

Telephone: (415) 956-1000

Facsimile: (415) 956-1008

Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs 

eMAG SOLUTIONS LLC, eMAG SOLUTIONS 

LIMITED and GREENCORP MAGNETICS PTY, LTD. 

and Individual Plaintiff CINTAS VAC, S.A. de C.V.

[Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

eMAG SOLUTIONS LLC, eMAG SOLUTIONS 

LIMITED, GREENCORP MAGNETICS PTY 

LTD., and DELTA MAGNETICS, S.A. de C.V., 

on behalf of themselves and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TODA KOGYO CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

No. C-02-1611 PJH

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER 

REGARDING JURISDICTIONAL 

BRIEFING AND DISCOVERY

CINTAS VAC, S.A. de C.V.

Plaintiff,

v.

TODA KOGYO CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 271 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

568209.2

-1-

[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING 

JURISDICTIONAL BRIEFING AND DISCOVERY

NO. C-02-1611 PJH

The Court, after consideration of Joint Status Report filed by all remaining parties 

to this litigation, hereby sets the following schedule:

DATE EVENT

October 27, 2006 Any Defendant that intends to file a motion to 

dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction must 

file such a motion by this date.

November 3, 2006 Plaintiffs must serve any jurisdictional 

discovery related to any motions to dismiss 

for lack of personal jurisdiction by this date.

November 17, 2006 Defendants must respond to Plaintiffs’ 

jurisdictional discovery by this date, and must 

inform Plaintiffs whether or not they intend 

to produce responsive discovery.

Two Weeks From the Refusal to Produce 

Responsive Discovery.

Should any Defendant refuse to respond to 

the jurisdictional discovery referenced above

or if Plaintiffs believe that a Defendant’s 

production is inadequate, Plaintiffs shall have 

two weeks from such refusal or limited 

production to file a letter brief, not to exceed 

five pages, seeking an order compelling the 

Defendant to produce discovery.

Two Weeks From Plaintiffs’ Letter Brief If Plaintiffs submit a letter brief seeking to 

compel production of jurisdictional 

discovery, Defendants shall have two weeks 

from the date of Plaintiffs’ letter brief to file 

their own letter brief, not to exceed five 

pages, in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion to 

compel. 

One Month From Production or Order Denying 

Motion to Compel

Plaintiffs shall submit their opposition to any

motion to dismiss for lack of personal 

jurisdiction one month from the completion 

of a Defendant’s production of jurisdictional 

discovery or, if the Court denies Plaintiffs’ 

request for discovery, one month from the 

Court’s order. 

Two Weeks After Plaintiffs File Their Brief 

Opposing A Motion to Dismiss for Lack of 

Personal Jurisdiction

Defendants shall submit their Reply Brief in 

support of their motion to dismiss for lack of 

personal jurisdiction two weeks after 

Plaintiffs submit their opposition brief.

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 271 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

568209.2

-2-

[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING 

JURISDICTIONAL BRIEFING AND DISCOVERY

NO. C-02-1611 PJH

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Dated: October 12, 2006 Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064)

Peter E. Leckman (State Bar No. 235721)

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &

BERNSTEIN, LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, 30th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-3339

Telephone: (415) 956-1000

By: /s/ Joseph R. Saveri

Joseph R. Saveri

Joshua P. Davis (State Bar No. 193254)

LAW OFFICES OF JOSHUA P. DAVIS

437 Valley Street

San Francisco, CA 94131

Telephone: (415) 422-6223

Steven M. Tillery

KOREIN TILLERY, LLC

701 Market Street, Suite 300

St. Louis, MO 63101

Telephone: (314) 241-4844

Facsimile: (314) 241-3525

Michael J. Brickman

Kimberly S. Keevers

James C. Bradley

RICHARDSON, PATRICK, WESTBROOK & 

BRICKMAN, LLC

174 East Bay Street

Charleston, SC 29402

Telephone: (843) 727-6500

Dated: 

The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Judge

Oct. 17, 2006

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 271 Filed 10/17/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

568209.2

-3-

[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING 

JURISDICTIONAL BRIEFING AND DISCOVERY

NO. C-02-1611 PJH

Francis O. Scarpulla (State Bar No. 41059)

LAW OFFICES OF 

FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 788-7210

Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs 

eMAG SOLUTIONS LLC, eMAG SOLUTIONS 

LIMITED and GREENCORP MAGNETICS PTY, 

LTD. and Individual Plaintiff CINTAS VAC, S.A. de 

C.V.

Dated: October 12, 2006 Thomas Hanrahan

Jennifer Ratner

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

555 W. 5th Street, 40th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90013

Phone: (213) 896-6000 

Fax: (213) 896-6600

By: /s/ Jennifer Ratner w/permission by PEL

 Jennifer Ratner

Attorneys for Defendants TODA KOGYO 

CORPORATION and TODA AMERICA, INC.

Dated: October 12, 2006 William M. Goodman

Raphael M. Goldman

TOPEL & GOODMAN

832 Sansome Street, 4th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Phone: (415) 421-6140

Fax: (415) 398-5030

By: /s/ William M. Goodman w/permission by PEL

 William M. Goodman

Attorneys Appearing Specially for Defendant

TITAN KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 271 Filed 10/17/06 Page 4 of 4