Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00867/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00867-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PERRY LEE SISCO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0867 GEB JFM P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed December 21, 2005, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

return to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on

defendants Beruth, Schmidt, Spears, and Falconer. That sixty day period has since passed, and

plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendants

Beruth, Schmidt, Spears and Falconer be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:05-cv-00867-GEB -JFM Document 26 Filed 03/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 8, 2006. 

/sisc0867.fusm

Case 2:05-cv-00867-GEB -JFM Document 26 Filed 03/08/06 Page 2 of 2