Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01052/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01052-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH A. SHERMAN, No. CIV.S-05-1052 MCE DAD PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

COUNTY OF YOLO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

By findings and recommendations filed July 5, 2005, the

undersigned recommended that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. Plaintiff filed written objections to those findings and

recommendations, but by order filed November 5, 2005, the assigned

district judge adopted them in full and dismissed this case. Judgment

was entered in accordance with that order on the same day.

Earlier this year plaintiff filed a request which the

undersigned construed as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). The undersigned recommended

that the motion be denied. Plaintiff filed written objections to that

Case 2:05-cv-01052-MCE -DAD Document 21 Filed 10/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

recommendation, but the findings and recommendations was adopted by

the assigned district judge by order filed June 1, 2006.

Since the entry of judgment in this case almost two years

ago, and even after the denial of plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion,

plaintiff has filed a number of documents seeking to file an amended

complaint and at least one inquiry as to the status of this action. 

(See Doc. nos. 15, 16, 18 & 20.) Because this case is closed, and in

light of the denial of the Rule 60 motion, plaintiff’s most recent

submissions will be placed in the court file and will not be further

responded to by the court. Plaintiff is advised that no further

orders will issue in response to any document submitted for filing in

this case in the future unless the document is one appropriately filed

in a closed case pursuant to an applicable federal rule.

DATED: October 18, 2006.

DAD:th

ddad1/orders.prose/sherman1052.58

Case 2:05-cv-01052-MCE -DAD Document 21 Filed 10/18/06 Page 2 of 2