Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00576/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00576-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut 

corporation;

Plaintiff,

vs.

OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, 

a Pennsylvania corporation; EVEREST 

INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a 

Delaware corporation; INTERSTATE FIRE & 

CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois 

corporation; FINANCIAL PACIFIC 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a California 

corporation; ARCH SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska 

corporation; NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York 

corporation; CLARENDON NATIONAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey 

corporation; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY fka ALLIED INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; 

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, a 

Pennsylvania corporation; ASPEN 

SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a 

North Dakota corporation; FIRST 

SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, 

a Missouri corporation; IRONSHORE 

SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an 

Arizona corporation; AMERICAN SAFETY 

INDEMNITY COMPANY, an Oklahoma 

corporation; LEXINGTON INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; 

PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY, RRG, a Washington, D.C. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:13-cv-00576-LJO-BAM

The Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (Doc. 12)

[Local Rule 144(a)]

Current Response Dates: 5/30/13 & 6/3/13 

New Response Date: 6/18/13

Case 1:13-cv-00576-LJO-BAM Document 29 Filed 06/04/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

corporation; SECURITY AMERICA RISK 

RETENTION GROUP, a Vermont 

corporation; ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE 

COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; ZURICH 

NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a New York corporation; 

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation; 

NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

NEW YORK, a New York corporation; 

CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY fka AMERICAN 

INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES 

INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois 

corporation; NAVIGATORS INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a New York corporation; 

TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, a 

California corporation; CERTAIN 

UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON, 

a Kentucky corporation; PRAETORIAN 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania; 

and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

On May 28, 2013, Plaintiff and Defendants Northern Insurance Company of New York and 

Zurich American Insurance Company, erroneously sued as Zurich North American Insurance 

Company, stipulated to extend Defendants’ time to file an answer or otherwise respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Doc. 12.) The Stipulation of the parties is APPROVED. Defendants 

Northern Insurance Company of New York and Zurich American Insurance Company, 

erroneously sued as Zurich North American Insurance Company, shall have up to an including 

June 18, 2013 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 4, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00576-LJO-BAM Document 29 Filed 06/04/13 Page 2 of 2