Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06738/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06738-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The United States Postal Service returned the Findings and Recommendations as undeliverable on March 1

15, 2007. A notation on the envelope indicates that plaintiff cannot be located. Prior to the March 15, 2007 return,

on February 26, 2007, the United States Postal Service returned an order adopting a different set of Findings and

Recommendations. A notation on that envelope indicates that the letter was not deliverable as addressed. Plaintiff

has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH WIDBY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

GAIL LEWIS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CIV F 04-6738 AWI DLB P

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION AND

REFERRING MATTER TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

On February 20, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations that

recommended the court deny Defendant Hesseltine’s motion for summary judgment and grant

Defendant Kushner’s motion for summary judgment. These Findings and Recommendations

were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and

Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. No party has filed objections to the 1

Case 1:04-cv-06738-AWI-DLB Document 62 Filed 03/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

effective. Local Rule 83-182(f).

2

Findings and Recommendations. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the entire file, the court finds that the Findings

and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued February 12, 2007, are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. Defendant Hesseltine’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED;

3. Defendant Kushner’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and

4. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06738-AWI-DLB Document 62 Filed 03/23/07 Page 2 of 2