Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04871/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04871-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RESCHEDULING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING 

(Case No. C 03-4871 JW) 

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

Morgan Chu – mchu@irell.com (70446) 

Samuel K. Lu – slu@irell.com (171969) 

Alan J. Heinrich – aheinrich@irell.com (212782) 

Richard E. Lyon – rlyon@irell.com (229288) 

1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 

Los Angeles, California 90067-4276 

Telephone: (310) 277-1010 

Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim-Defendant 

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

Daralyn J. Durie (169825) 

Leo L. Lam (181861) 

Eugene M. Paige (202849) 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaim-Plaintiff 

PIXART IMAGING INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, 

 v. 

PIXART IMAGING INC., 

 a Taiwanese corporation, 

 Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 03-4871 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RESCHEDULING SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT HEARING 

Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 153 Filed 01/04/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 154 Filed 01/09/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RESCHEDULING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING 

(Case No. C 03-4871 JW) 

- 1 - 

On June 27, 2005, Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff, PixArt Imaging Inc. ("PixArt"), 

filed its Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,433,780. 

Thereafter, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, Agilent Technologies, Inc. ("Agilent"), and 

PixArt fully briefed the motion. On November 9, 2005, the Court issued an order vacating the 

hearing on the motion scheduled for November 14, 2005. The Court also invited Agilent to file a 

cross-motion for summary judgment on the issues raised by PixArt's motion. The Court instructed 

Agilent to file its cross-motion by January 9, 2006, and the Court set a hearing for February 13, 

2006 on both the motion and the cross-motion. Since then, a conflict has arisen with counsel on 

that date. Counsel for Agilent and counsel for PixArt are willing to stipulate to a continuance of 

the hearing currently scheduled for February 13, 2006, until March 6, 2005. Counsel for Agilent 

has confirmed with the Court that March 6, 2005 is a date available to have the motions heard. 

Therefore, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, Agilent, and Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff, PixArt, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that the hearing date may be 

continued to March 6, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, 280 South First Street, San 

Jose, CA, 95113 before the Honorable James Ware. The parties further stipulate that Agilent will 

file its cross-motion on January 19, 2006; PixArt will file its opposition brief on February 13, 

2006; and Agilent will file its reply brief on February 20, 2006. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 153 Filed 01/04/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 154 Filed 01/09/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RESCHEDULING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING 

(Case No. C 03-4871 JW) 

1431193

- 2 - 

Dated: January 4, 2006 IRELL & MANELLA LLP

By: /s/ Richard E. Lyon 

 Richard E. Lyon 

 Attorneys for and Plaintiff 

 Counterclaim-Defendant 

 AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC 

Dated: January 4, 2006 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By:/s/ Eugene M. Paige 

 Eugene M. Paige 

 Attorneys for and Defendant 

 Counterclaim-Plaintiff 

 PIXART IMAGING INC. 

I hereby attest, pursuant to section X of General Order 45, that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from Eugene M. Paige, Esq., Attorney for Defendant and 

Counterclaim-Plaintiff PixArt Imaging Inc. 

Dated: January 4, 2006 By:/s/ Richard E. Lyon

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' summary 

judgment hearing currently scheduled for February 13, 2006 is hereby removed from the calendar. 

Instead, the hearing will be held on March 13, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, 280 

South First Street, San Jose, CA, 95113 before the Honorable James Ware. It is further ordered 

that Agilent will file its cross-motion on January 26, 2006; PixArt will file its opposition brief on 

February 20, 2006; and Agilent will file its reply brief on February 27, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 HONORABLE JAMES WARE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 153 Filed 01/04/2006 Page 3 of 3

01/09/06

Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 154 Filed 01/09/06 Page 3 of 3