Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01522/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01522-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUVENAL DEANDA,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFF WRIGLEY, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 06-1522 AWI DLB HC

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF

PETITIONER AND TERMINATE ACTION

[Docs. 6, 7]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On February 8, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations

recommending that the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus be granted. On May 18, 2007,

the Findings and Recommendations were adopted in full and Respondent was directed consider

the appropriateness of transferring Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set forth in 18

U.S.C. § 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed appropriate by the BOP, without

reference to the BOP policy promulgated in December 2002 and without reference to the BOP’s

February 14, 2005, amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. Respondent was directed to make this

determination within three (3) months from the date of service of that order. (Court Doc. 6.) 

On June 1, 2007, Respondent filed a notice of verification of compliance with the Court’s

May 18, 2007, order. (Court Doc. 9.) Respondent submits a form entitled “Institutional Referral

for CCC Placement,” dated May 23, 2007, which indicates that Petitioner was evaluated “without

Case 1:06-cv-01522-AWI-DLB Document 8 Filed 06/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

reference to the time constraints imposed by 28 C.F.R. § 570.20-21 or the 2002 and 2005

Community Corrections Policies.” Attachment 1, Court Doc. 7. As a result of this evaluation, it

was recommended that Petitioner spend 60-90 days in an RRC prior to his release. 

Because Petitioner has been evaluated in compliance with the Court’s February 8, 2007,

Findings and Recommendation, the action shall be terminated. Thus, it is HEREBY ORDERED

that the Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of Petitioner, and CLOSE the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 19, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01522-AWI-DLB Document 8 Filed 06/20/07 Page 2 of 2