Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-md-01819/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-md-01819-79/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

vLAW OFFICES

COTCHETT, PITRE &

MCCARTHY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DIRECT PURCHASER

PLAINTIFFS’ AND INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ FILING JOINT

OPPOSITION IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT [CIVIL L.R. 7-12]

Case No. 4:07-md-1819 CW; MDL No. 1819

JOSEPH W. COTCHETT (#36324)

jcotchett@cpmlegal.com 

STEVEN N. WILLIAMS (#175489)

swilliams@cpmlegal.com 

NEIL SWARTZBERG (#215133)

nswartzberg@cpmlegal.com 

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY

San Francisco Airport Office Center

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200

Burlingame, CA 94010

Telephone: (650) 697-6000

Facsimile: (650) 697-0577

Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser Class

Francis O. Scarpulla (#41059)

fscarpulla@zelle.com

Craig C. Corbitt (#83251)

ccorbitt@zelle.com

Christopher T. Micheletti (#136446)

cmicheletti@zelle.com

Qianwei Fu (#242669)

qfu@zelle.com

Jane Yi (#257893)

jyi@zelle.com

ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL & MASON LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 693-0700

Facsimile: (415) 693-0770

Lead and Liaison Counsel for Indirect Purchaser Class

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION

IN RE STATIC RANDOM ACCESS

MEMORY (SRAM) ANTITRUST

LITIGATION

__________________________________

This Document Relates to:

ALL ACTIONS

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Master File No. 4:07-md-01819-CW

MDL No. 1819

STIPULATION AND ORDER

REGARDING DIRECT PURCHASER

PLAINTIFFS’ AND INDIRECT

PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ FILING

JOINT OPPOSITION IN EXCESS OF

PAGE LIMIT [CIVIL L.R. 7-12]

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 1070 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 4
vLAW OFFICES

COTCHETT, PITRE &

MCCARTHY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DIRECT PURCHASER

PLAINTIFFS’ AND INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ FILING JOINT

OPPOSITION IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT [CIVIL L.R. 7-12]

Case No. 4:07-md-1819 CW; MDL No. 1819

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DIRECT PURCHASER

PLAINTIFFS’ AND INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ FILING JOINT

OPPOSITION IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT [CIVIL L.R. 7-12]

Case No. 4:07-md-1819 CW; MDL No. 1819 2

WHEREAS, on August 2, 2010, the Court ordered Cypress to file a consolidated

summary judgment motion on the claims of the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and the Indirect

Purchaser Plaintiffs (Docket No. 1062). 

WHEREAS, on August 3, 2010, Cypress filed an unopposed administrative motion for

Clarification of the Court's August 2, 2010 order (Docket No. 1063), in which Cypress sought

clarification as to whether its consolidated summary judgment motion could exceed the 25-page

limit set forth in the Court's Order of June 8, 2007 (Docket No. 206), or, in the alternative,

Cypress could have an extension of up to five pages.

WHEREAS, on August 4, 2010, the Court issued an order (Docket No. 1066), granting

Cypress's unopposed administrative motion for Clarification of the Court's August 2, 2010 order,

and allowed Cypress to have a five-page extension, or up to 30 pages, for its consolidated

summary judgment motion. 

WHEREAS, on August 5, 2010 Cypress filed its consolidated Motion for Summary

Judgment or, in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 1068).

WHEREAS, Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs anticipate filing

a Joint Opposition to that motion, and anticipate needing to have a five-page extension, or up to

30 pages, to fully respond to that motion. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL THAT: 

Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs may have a five-page

extension, or up to 30 pages, to respond to Defendant Cypress Semiconductor Corporation’s

Notice of Motion and Motion For Summary Judgment Or, in The Alternative, for Partial

Summary Judgment.

/ / /

/ / /

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 1070 Filed 08/13/10 Page 2 of 4
vLAW OFFICES

COTCHETT, PITRE &

MCCARTHY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DIRECT PURCHASER

PLAINTIFFS’ AND INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ FILING JOINT

OPPOSITION IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT [CIVIL L.R. 7-12]

Case No. 4:07-md-1819 CW; MDL No. 1819

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DIRECT PURCHASER

PLAINTIFFS’ AND INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ FILING JOINT

OPPOSITION IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT [CIVIL L.R. 7-12]

Case No. 4:07-md-1819 CW; MDL No. 1819 3

Dated August 12, 2010 Respectfully Submitted,

 /s/ Neil Swartzberg Joseph W. Cotchett

Steven N. Williams

Neil Swartzberg

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY

San Francisco Airport Office Center

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200

Burlingame, CA 94010

Telephone: (650) 697-6000

Facsimile: (650) 697-0577

Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs

Dated: August 12, 2010 /s/ Christopher Micheletti 

Francis O. Scarpulla

Craig C. Corbitt

Christopher T. Micheletti

Qianwei Fu

Jane Yi

ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL & MASON LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 693-0700

Facsimile: (415) 693-0770

Lead and Liaison Counsel for Indirect 

Purchaser Class

Dated: August 12, 2010 MAYER BROWN LLP

 /s/ Gary A. Winters 

Gary A. Winters

MAYER BROWN LLP

1999 K Street NW

Washington, DC 20006-1001

(202) 263-3000

Counsel for Defendant Cypress Semiconductor

Corporation

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), I hereby attest that the above signatories

concur in the filing of this document.

 /s/ Neil Swartzberg 

Neil Swartzberg

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 1070 Filed 08/13/10 Page 3 of 4
vLAW OFFICES

COTCHETT, PITRE &

MCCARTHY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DIRECT PURCHASER

PLAINTIFFS’ AND INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ FILING JOINT

OPPOSITION IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT [CIVIL L.R. 7-12]

Case No. 4:07-md-1819 CW; MDL No. 1819

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DIRECT PURCHASER

PLAINTIFFS’ AND INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ FILING JOINT

OPPOSITION IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT [CIVIL L.R. 7-12]

Case No. 4:07-md-1819 CW; MDL No. 1819 4

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 13, 2010 

HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 1070 Filed 08/13/10 Page 4 of 4