Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01489/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01489-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE DeJESUS RODRIGUEZ,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1489 MCE GGH P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed August 24, 2005, petitioner’s application was dismissed and thirty

days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now expired,

and petitioner has not filed an amended application. While petitioner has filed several other

documents, none of these other documents may be construed as an amended application. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

dismissed. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:05-cv-01489-DFL -DAD Document 14 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 1/18/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

rodr1489.fta

Case 2:05-cv-01489-DFL -DAD Document 14 Filed 01/19/06 Page 2 of 2