Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03780/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03780-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Hector Rey, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-3780-PHX-JAT

ORDER

On February 27, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that the Complaint in this case be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's

failure to prosecute and failure to comply with Court orders pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Report and Recommendation

(Defendant has not been served or appeared).

This Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is “clear that the

district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if

objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219,

1126 (D.Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not otherwise.’”). District

courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject

Case 2:05-cv-03780-JAT Document 10 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (emphasis added); see also 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the

[report and recommendation] to which objection is made.”).

Because no objections were filed,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #8) is accepted and

adopted, the Complaint is dismissed, without prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter

judgment accordingly.

DATED this 25th day of April, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03780-JAT Document 10 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 2