Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-02889/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-02889-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDMENT TO 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED JANUARY 14, 2010 

Case No. CV-09-2889-JW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Laurence D. King (SBN 206423) 

lking@kaplanfox.com

Linda M. Fong (SBN 124232) 

lfong@kaplanfox.com

Mario M. Choi (SBN 243409) 

mchoi@kaplanfox.com

KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 

350 Sansome Street, Suite 400 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: 415-772-4700 

Facsimile: 415-772-4707 

Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 

[Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In Re Intel Laptop Battery Litigation 

Case No. CV-09-2889-JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE AMENDMENT TO 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

ENTERED JANUARY 14, 2010 

 

XXXXXXXXXXXX

Case 5:09-cv-02889-JW Document 91 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDMENT TO STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED JANUARY 14, 2010 

Case No. CV-09-2889-JW 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS a Stipulated Protective Order was entered by the Court on January 14, 2010 (the 

“Protective Order”). 

WHEREAS a third party upon whom plaintiffs served a subpoena, NVIDIA Corp., requested 

that the parties add an additional category of "Confidential Information or Items" to the Protective 

Order: “Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel’s Eyes Only,” in light of the sensitivity to NVIDIA of 

some of the subpoenaed documents, which NVIDIA does not wish to be shared with Intel's in-house 

counsel. 

WHEREAS plaintiffs and defendants do not object to this additional category so that NVIDIA 

and other Designating Parties may hereafter designate documents with this label when warranted, and 

such designation shall be treated as set forth below. 

WHEREAS defendants and plaintiffs agree that NVIDIA should be included in the list of Intel 

competitors listed in the Protective Order. 

WHEREAS on July 8, 2010 the parties submitted an Amended Stipulated Protective Order, 

D.E. #88, which sets forth the parties’ agreement to amend the Protective Order as follows: 

1. A new category of "Confidential Information or Items" shall be added to Section 2 

("DEFINITIONS") of the Protective Order as follows: 

“2.14: Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel’s Eyes Only: extremely 

sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” whose disclosure to 

another Party, nonparty or House Counsel would create a substantial risk 

of serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive means.” 

2. Sections 2.8 ("Protected Material"), 5.2 (“Manner and Timing of Designations”), 5.3 

(“Inadvertent Failure to Designate”), 7.4 (“Procedures for Approving Disclosures of “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items to “Experts””), and 8 

(“PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER 

LITIGATION of the Protective Order shall be amended to include, in addition to “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the new category ‘HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 

OUTSIDE COUNSEL’S EYES ONLY.” 

Case 5:09-cv-02889-JW Document 91 Filed 07/26/10 Page 2 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDMENT TO STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED JANUARY 14, 2010 

Case No. CV-09-2889-JW 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. The following section of the Protective Order shall be added following section 7.3 

(“Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items”: 

“7.3a Disclosure of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –OUTSIDE COUNSEL’S EYES ONLY” 

Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating 

Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 

– OUTSIDE COUNSEL’S EYES ONLY” only to: 

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as 

employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for 

this litigation; 

(b) Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary 

for this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” 

(Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4, below, have been 

followed; 

(c) the Court and its personnel; 

(d) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and 

(e) the author of the document or the original source of the information. 

4. NVIDIA Corp. shall be added to the list of "Intel competitors" in Section 2.12.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: July 14, 2010 GIRARD GIBBS LLP 

Interim Class Counsel for PLAINTIFFS 

KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 

 By: /s/ Linda M. Fong 

 Linda M. Fong 

Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Case 5:09-cv-02889-JW Document 91 Filed 07/26/10 Page 3 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDMENT TO STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED JANUARY 14, 2010 

Case No. CV-09-2889-JW 

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: July 14, 2010 PERKINS COIE BROWN & BAIN P.A. 

 By: /s/ Anthony L. Marks 

 Anthony L. Marks 

Counsel for Defendant Intel Corporation

DATED: July 14, 2010 NARANCIC & KATZMAN, PC. 

 By: /s/ Perry J. Narancic 

 Perry J. Narancic 

Counsel for Defendant Business Applications 

Performance Corporation 

ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: _____________________, 2010 __________________________________ 

 The Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull 

 United States Magistrate 

July 26

Case 5:09-cv-02889-JW Document 91 Filed 07/26/10 Page 4 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDMENT TO STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED JANUARY 14, 2010 

Case No. CV-09-2889-JW 

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION 

I, Linda M. Fong, the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

electronically file this document hereby attest, in compliance with General Order 45.X.B, that Perry 

J. Narancic and Anthony L. Marks have concurred in its filing and that their concurrence in the 

filing of this document, indicated by a conformed signature (“/s/”) within this e-filed document, will 

be kept on file. 

Dated: July 14, 2010 

 /s/ Linda M. Fong 

 Linda M. Fong 

Case 5:09-cv-02889-JW Document 91 Filed 07/26/10 Page 5 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDMENT TO STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED JANUARY 14, 2010 

Case No. CV-09-2889-JW 

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Certificate of Service

The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served this 14th day of July, 2010 with a copy of this 

document via the Court’s CM/ECF system. I certify that all parties who have appeared in this case 

are represented by counsel who are CM/ECF participants. Any other counsel of record will be 

served by electronic mail, facsimile transmission, and/or first class mail on this same date. 

 /s/ Linda M. Fong 

 Linda M. Fong 

Case 5:09-cv-02889-JW Document 91 Filed 07/26/10 Page 6 of 6