Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02623/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02623-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:6901 Resource &amp; Recovery Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-2623 GEB DAD

v.

DOPACO, INC.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

This case came before the court on June 18, 2010, for hearing on defendant’s

motion to quash (Doc. No. 93). H. Christian L’Orange, Esq. appeared for defendant and moving

party Dopaco, Inc. Marc Poe, Esq. appeared for plaintiff The Newark Group, Inc.

For the reasons stated in open court, defendant’s motion to quash plaintiff’s

deposition notice of defendant’s consulting expert Joseph Kelly is DENIED. It is appropriate for

Mr. Kelly to be subject to limited questioning by plaintiff’s counsel regarding the contents of the

ink sold by SCI during Mr. Kelly’s employment with SCI, based solely upon Mr. Kelly’s

knowledge gained by way of his employment with SCI at that time and not based on any

subsequent investigation, testing, and research conducted by Mr. Kelly.

Questioning of Mr. Kelly by plaintiff’s counsel will be limited to two hours of

actual questioning. Questioning by defendant’s counsel will not be limited. Plaintiff’s counsel

Case 2:08-cv-02623-GEB-DAD Document 100 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

may cross-examine Mr. Kelly regarding any matter raised by defendant’s counsel. Counsel shall

work together with regard to the timing and location of the deposition. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 22, 2010.

DAD:kw

Ddad1/orders.civil/newark2623.oah.061810

Case 2:08-cv-02623-GEB-DAD Document 100 Filed 06/22/10 Page 2 of 2