Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01947/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01947-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Selena Alicia Coronado, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Dora Schriro, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV04-1947-PHX-DGC

ORDER

Defendants have filed a Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Defendants’ Objections

to the Magistrate’s July 22, 2005 Scheduling Order (Doc. #28). Defendants have also filed

a Motion to Terminate the Relief Granted in the Magistrate’s July 22, 2005 Scheduling

Order. Doc. #29. 

Defendants’ motion to reconsider is untimely. Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(g)

states that “[a]bsent good cause shown, any motion for reconsideration shall be filed no later

than ten (10) days after the filing of the Order that is the subject of the motion.” The Court’s

Order was entered on January 24, 2006. Doc. #23. Defendants’ motion for reconsideration

was filed on March 3, 2006. Doc. #28. Defendants’ motion was not filed within the ten days

required by LRCiv. 7.2(g), and Defendants have not shown good cause for the untimely

filing. As a result, the motion to reconsider will be denied.

The Court will direct that the Magistrate Judge rule on the Motion to Terminate. 

Doc. #29.

Case 2:04-cv-01947-DGC-BPV Document 33 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Defendants’ Objections to

the Magistrate’s July 22, 2005 Scheduling Order (Doc. #28) is denied.

2. Defendants’ Motion to Terminate the Relief Granted in the Magistrate’s July

22, 2005 Scheduling Order (Doc. #29) is referred to the Magistrate Judge for the ruling in

the first instance.

DATED this 27th day of March, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-01947-DGC-BPV Document 33 Filed 03/28/06 Page 2 of 2