Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00893/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00893-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM VERA, aka Memo Vera,

Plaintiff,

v.

WARDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

1:22-cv-00893-KES-CDB (PC)

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO 

STATE A CLAIM

(Doc. 66) 

Plaintiff William Vera, also known as Memo Vera, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se

and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

I. INTRODUCTION

On June 10, 2024, this Court issued Findings and Recommendations to Dismiss this 

Action for Plaintiff’s Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted. (Doc. 65.) 

Plaintiff was to file any objections within 14 days of the date of service of the order. (Id. at 23-

24.) 

On June 24, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Motion for Extension of Time 

F.R.C.P. 6.” (Doc. 66.) Plaintiff seeks a 60-day extension of time within which to file his 

objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (Id.) He asserts the findings involve 

substantially complex issues and a large amount of case law, that law library access “is very 

limited” and sessions are often cancelled, that he “has a 3.3 G.P.L. Education,” and that, in his 

opinion, he “cannot generate the objections within the time prescribed by the Court” (Id.) 

Case 1:22-cv-00893-KES-CDB Document 68 Filed 06/25/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

II. CONCLUSION AND ORDER

For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s request for a 60-day extension of time (Doc. 66) is GRANTED; and

2. Plaintiff SHALL file any objections to the Findings and Recommendations within 60 

days of the date of service of this order.

If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court will recommend that this action 

be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to obey court orders and for failure to 

prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 25, 2024 ___________________ _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-00893-KES-CDB Document 68 Filed 06/25/24 Page 2 of 2