Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02179/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02179-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEOFFREY MOYLE, an individual;

PAULINE ARWOOD, an individual;

THOMAS ROLLASON, an

individual; and JEANNIE SANDERS,

an individual, on behalf of themselves,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO.10cv2179-GPC(MDD)

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE FOR

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

vs.

LIBERTY MUTUAL RETIREMENT

BENEFIT PLAN; LIBERTY

MUTUAL RETIREMENT PLAN

RETIREMENT BOARD; LIBERTY

MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP,

INC., a Massachusetts company;

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY, a Massachusetts

company,

Defendants.

The court held a status conference on September 6, 2016 after the Ninth Circuit

issued its mandate affirming in part and reversing in part the Court’s order on summary

judgment and remanding the case. (Dkt. No. 282.) Prior to setting the matter for trial,

Defendants request that the Court address the statute of limitations issue that was not

addressed by this Court or the Ninth Circuit as it relates to the remaining claim under

29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). 

In light of the Court’s ruling on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the

- 1 - [10cv2179-GPC(MDD)]

Case 3:10-cv-02179-GPC-MDD Document 292 Filed 10/14/16 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Court did not address Defendants’ argument on statute of limitations concerning the

cause of action under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). (Dkt. No. 252 at 26 n.9.) The Ninth

Circuit also declined to address Defendants’ argument on this issue and commented

that the “district court may consider such arguments on remand.” Moyle v. Liberty

Mut. Retirement Benefit Plan, – F.3d –, 2016 WL 4394583, at *8 n.5 (9th Cir. 2016). 

The Court finds it appropriate to consider the statute of limitations issue that

might bar the claims under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that Defendants shall file a supplemental brief, no longer than 10 pages,

to address any recent developments in the law on or before October 28, 2016. 

Plaintiffs shall file an opposition, no longer than 10 pages, on or before November 10, 

2016. Defendants shall file a reply of no longer than 5 pages on or before November

18, 2016. A hearing is set on December 16, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2D. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 14, 2016

HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL

United States District Judge

- 2 - [10cv2179-GPC(MDD)]

Case 3:10-cv-02179-GPC-MDD Document 292 Filed 10/14/16 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2