Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05795/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05795-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Case No. C 06 5795 RS 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

MARK A. STEINER (State Bar No. 88124) 

MARC M. GORELNIK (State Bar No. 166833) 

MARIE C. SEIBEL (State Bar No. 221014) 

Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 576-0200 

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 

Email: mas@townsend.com, mmg@townsend.com, m2s@townsend.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

URS CORPORATION 

LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND (State Bar No. 88184) 

LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND 

455 Market Street, 19th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 882-3288 

Facsimile: (415) 882-3299 

Email: ltownsend@owe.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UTILITY RESOURCE 

SOLUTIONS, L.P. and URS FIELD 

SERVICES, L.L.C. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

URS CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

UTILITY RESOURCE SOLUTIONS, L.P., a 

Texas limited partnership, and URS FIELD 

SERVICES, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability 

company, 

 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: C 06 5795 RS 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE 

 

AND ORDER THEREON

*E-FILED 4/20/07*

Case 5:06-cv-05795-RS Document 22 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 2
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Case No. C 06 5795 RS 

2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, by and through their respective counsel, 

that plaintiff URS Corporation’s Complaint against defendants Utility Resource Solutions, L.P. and 

URS Field Services, L.L.C., is hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a), except that the dismissal shall be without prejudice to the parties’ respective rights to 

enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Respectfully submitted, 

TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP 

Dated: April 18, 2007. By: /s/ 

 Marc M. Gorelnik 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

URS CORPORATION 

 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND 

Dated: April 18, 2007. By: /s/ 

 Lawrence G. Townsend 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

UTILITY RESOURCE SOLUTIONS, L.P. and URS 

FIELD SERVICES, L.L.C. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

__________________________________ 

The Honorable Richard Seeborg 

United States District Court Magistrate Judge

Dated: April 20, 2007

Case 5:06-cv-05795-RS Document 22 Filed 04/20/07 Page 2 of 2