Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01917/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01917-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS VILLEGAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MATHEW CATE, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:10-cv-01917-AWI-SKO PC

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION, WITH PREJUDICE

(Doc. 33)

Plaintiff Carlos Villegas, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 14, 2010. This action is 

proceeding on Plaintiff’s amended complaint against Defendant Neubarth for acting with 

deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment 

of the United States Constitution.

On August 19, 2013, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s motion for the issuance 

of a subpoena for service on Defendant. On September 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for 

reconsideration.

Plaintiff has identified no basis for reconsideration. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); Local Rule 

230(j). The Court and the United States Marshal are in the process of serving Defendant, and the 

issuance of another subpoena is not necessary at this time. If an order directing re-service with 

new documents becomes necessary, the Court will issue an order.

Case 1:10-cv-01917-SKO Document 34 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is HEREBY DENIED, with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 27, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01917-SKO Document 34 Filed 09/30/13 Page 2 of 2