Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00066/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00066-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEX LAMONA MARTI,

Plaintiff,

v.

F. PADILLA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00066-LJO-GSA PC

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

APPROPRIATE, AND FORWARDING

SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR

COMPLETION AND RETURN WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. 20)

Plaintiff Alex Lamona Marti (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on January

12, 2007. The Court has screened Plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and

finds that it states cognizable claims for relief under section 1983 against Defendants Padilla, Knight,

Guirt, Ramirez, Williams, Wadkins, Smart, Hansen, Smith, Gardner, Boos, Huise, Tolson, Fulks,

Jordt, Munoz, Baires, Arline, Lais, Santoro, Reynoso, and Polk for retaliation, in violation of the

First Amendment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Erickson v. Pardus, 127 S.Ct. 2197, 2200 (2007); Alvarez

v. Hill, 2008 WL 659570, No. 06-35068, *3 (9th Cir. Mar. 13, 2008). Accordingly, it is HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

C/O F. PADILLA

C/O S. KNIGHT

C/O McGUIRT

C/O F. RAMIREZ

Case 1:07-cv-00066-LJO-BAM Document 23 Filed 04/11/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

C/O W. W. WILLIAMS

LT. W. S. WADKINS

CC II L. SMART

CPT. R. HANSEN

SGT. S. SMITH

C/O W. GARDNER

C/O S. BOOS

C/O R. HUISE

LT. R. TOLSON

CDW D. FULKS

C/O D. JORDT

SGT. C. MUNOZ

LT. M. A. BAIRES

CC II D. ARLINE

CPT. J. LAIS

CPT. K. SANTORO

CPT. J. REYNOSO

CDW LETHEL POLK

2. The Clerk of theCourtshallsend Plaintiff twenty-two (22) USM-285 forms, twentytwo (22) summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction

sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed July 9, 2007.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

Court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Twenty-three (23) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed July 9,

2007. 

Case 1:07-cv-00066-LJO-BAM Document 23 Filed 04/11/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the Court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 11, 2008 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

60kij UNI 8 TED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00066-LJO-BAM Document 23 Filed 04/11/08 Page 3 of 3