Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00333/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00333-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Property

---

Gibson, Dunn &

Crutcher LLP

1 PETER SULLIVAN, SBN 101428

PSullivaii~gibsondunn.com

2 SAML G. LIVERSIDGE, SBN 180578

SLiversidge~gibsondunn.com

3 MICHAEL H. DORE, SBN 227442

MDore~gibsondunn.com

4 GIBSON, DUN & CRUTCHER LLP

333 South Grand Avenue

5 Los Angeles, California 90071-3197

Telephone: (213) 229-7000

6 Facsimile: (213) 229-7520

7 Attorneys for Defendant

HEWLETT -PACKA COMPAN

8

9

10

11

12

13

UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JACKI BLENNIS and DAVID BRICKNR,

14 individually and on behalf of all others similarly

situated,

15

16

17

Plaintiffs,

v.

HEWLETT-PACKA COMPAN, a

18 Californa Corporation; and DOES 1 through

250, inclusive,

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

. Defendants.

CASE NO. C 07 00333-JF

JOINT STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED)

ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO

HOLD ADR SESSION; SUPPORTING

DECLARTIONS OF ALFREDO

TORRJOS AND MICHAEL H. DORE

(N.D. CaL. Local Rule 6-1(b) & 6-2)

JOINT STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

CONTINUIG DEADLINE TO HOLD ADR SESSION

Case No. C 0700333 JF

**E-filed 2/8/08** ----------------

Case 5:07-cv-00333-JF Document 35 Filed 02/08/08 Page 1 of 5
1 JOINT STIPULATION

2 WHREAS Plaintiffs Jackie Blennis and David Brickner ("Plaintiffs") commenced this

3 action by filing a Complaint on Januar 17, 2007, and serving the Complaint on Defendant Hewlett4 Packard Company ("Defendant") on May 1, 2007;

5 WHEREAS on August 20, 2007, the Court (Judge Ronald Whyte presiding) set the deadline

6 for the paries to hold an ADR session at 180 days from the date of his August 20, 2007 order, that is,

7 February 16, 2008;

8 WHREAS on Januar 14, 2008, the Cour granted the parties' stipulated request to continue

9 the case management conference in this matter until March 14, 2008 at 10:30 a.m.; and

10 WHEREAS good cause exists for approving this Joint Stipulation in light of the procedural

11 postue of this and related cases pending in this Court in which HP is a defendant.

12 ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), the pares, by and through their counsel of

13 record, hereby stipulate to, and request the Cour's approval ofthe following:

14 . The pares agree that the existing deadline for the paries to hold the ADR session shall

15 be moved from February 16,2008, to May 16, 2008.

16 IT IS SO STIPULATED.

17

18 DATED: Februar 2.,2008

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KAATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP

BRIAN S. KABA TECK

RICHAR L. KELLNER

ALFREDO TORRIJOS

B ~-.

Alfredo Torrjos /

Attorneys for Plam 1 fs JACKIE BLENNIS and DAVID

BRICKNR

Gibson, Dunn &

Crutcher LLP

2

JOINT STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

CONTINUIG DEADLINE TO HOLD ADR SESSION

Case No. C 0700333 JF

Case 5:07-cv-00333-JF Document 35 Filed 02/08/08 Page 2 of 5
Gibson, Dunn &

Crutcher LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

I DATED: February!4, 2008 GIBSON, DUN & CRUTCHER LLP

PETER SULLIV AN

SAML G. LIVERSIDGE

MICHAEL H. DORE

By:

L- t6 7£ 'i Michael H. //

Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT -P ACKA

COMPAN

11 Dated: ,2008

12

13

The Hon. Jeremy Fogel 14 United States Distrct Judge

15 1 00382052J DOC

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

CONTINUING DEADLINE TO HOLD ADR SESSION

Case No. C 0700333 JF

2/7/08

Case 5:07-cv-00333-JF Document 35 Filed 02/08/08 Page 3 of 5
Gibson, Dunn &

Crutcher LLP

1

2

3

DECLARTION OF MICHAEL H. DORE

I, Michael H. Dore, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice law before all courts of the State of California

4 and I intend to submit an application to become a member of the bar of this Court. I am an associate

5 in the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, and I am one of the attorneys responsible for the

6 representation of Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") in the action entitled Jackie Blennis

7 and David Brickner, et at. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, et at. (N.D. CaL. Case No. C 07-00333-

8 RMW). Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), I submit this declaration in support of the paries' Joint

9 Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Continuing Deadline to Hold ADR Session (the "Joint

10 Stipulation"). Unless otherwise stated, the following facts are within my personal knowledge and, if

11 called and sworn as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto.

12 2. The Reasons for the Requested Enlargement or Shortening of Time (Local Rule 6-

13 2(a)(1)). I believe that in light of the procedural posture of this case and related cases pending in this

14 Cour in which HP is a defendant, effciency would best be served by extending the deadline for the

15 parties to hold their ADR session.

16 3. Prior Time Modifications in this Case (Local Rule 6-2(a)(2)). The parties twice have

17 requested that the date of the case management conference be continued while HP's motion to

18 dismiss was pending. Those requests have been granted. The case management conference now is

19 scheduled for March 14, 2008.

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. Effect ofthe Requested Time Modification on the Schedule for the Case (Local

Rule 6-2(a)(3)). The requested extension oftime to hold an ADR session would change the deadline

from February 16,2008 until May 16, 2008.

I declare under penalty of peijury that the foregoing is tre and correct.

DATED: FebruaryL,2008

L_~ ~__

MICHAL . DORE

100382052_1 DOC

DECLARTION OF MICHAEL H. DORE Case No. C 0700333 JF

Case 5:07-cv-00333-JF Document 35 Filed 02/08/08 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gibson, Dunn &

Crutcher LLP

DECLARTION OF ALFREDO TORRJOS

I, Alfredo Torrjos, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice law before all cours of 

the State ofCalifomia. 1 am

an associate in the law firm of Kabateck Brown Kellner LLP, and I am one of the attorneys

responsible for the representation of Plaintiffs Jackie Blennis and David Brickner ("Plaintiffs") in the

action entitled Jackie Blennis and David Brickner, et al. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, et al. (N.D.

CaL. Case No. C 07-00333-RMW). Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), I submit this declaration in

support of the paries' Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Continuing Deadline to Hold ADR

Session (the "Joint Stipulation"). Unless otherwse stated, the following facts are within my personal

knowledge and, if called and sworn as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto_

2. The Reasons for the Requested Enlargement or Shortenin.g 6fTime (Local Rule 6-

2(a)(I)). I believe that in light of the procedural posture of this case and related cases pending in this

Cour in which HP is a defendant, efficiency would best be served by extending the deadline for the

paries to hold their ADR session.

3. Prior Time Modifications in this Case (Local Rule 6-2(a)(2)). The parties twice have

requested that the date of the case management conference be continued while HP's motion to

dismiss was pending. Those requests have been granted. The case management conference now Is

scheduled for March 14, 2008.

4. Effect of the Requested Time Modification on the Schedule for the Case (Local Rule 6-

2(a)(3)). The requested extension oftime to hold an ADR session would change the deadline from

February 16, 2008 until May 16,2008.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tre and correct.

DATED: February 1,2008

~TO:r

DECLARTION OF ALFREDO TORRJOS Case No. C 07 00333 JF

Case 5:07-cv-00333-JF Document 35 Filed 02/08/08 Page 5 of 5