Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05212/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05212-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN A. CHAVEZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

G. J. GUIRBINO, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

1:04-CV-05212 AWI LJO HC 

ORDER GRANTING FINAL EXTENSION

OF TIME 

[Doc. #23]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On March 6, 2006, the undersigned issued a Findings and Recommendation which

recommended the petition be denied. The order was returned by the U.S. Postal Service on

March 14, 2006, and undeliverable. On April 27, 2006, the District Court directed the Clerk of Court

to correct the Petitioner’s identification number and re-serve Petitioner with the Findings and

Recommendation. On the same date, the Findings and Recommendation were re-served on

Petitioner. Petitioner filed a motion for extension of time on May 15, 2006. On June 14, 2006, the

undersigned issued an order granting an extension of time until July 18, 2006. On July 19, 2006,

Petitioner filed the instant motion for a second extension of time.

Petitioner states he needs additional time to file his objections, because the U.S. Marshal lost

his legal paperwork during transit. Accordingly, good cause having been presented to the Court and

Case 1:04-cv-05212-AWI-LJO Document 25 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

good cause appearing therefor, Petitioner is GRANTED an extension of time of thirty (30) days from

the date of service of this order. However, because the Findings and Recommendation will have been

pending for over four months, Petitioner is advised that this will be the final extension of time

granted before the Findings and Recommendation is submitted to the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 10, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

23ehd0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05212-AWI-LJO Document 25 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 2