Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03526/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03526-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETROLEUM SALES, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

VALERO REFINING COMPANY -

CALIFORNIA, et al.

Defendant(s). /

No. C 05-3526 SBA (MEJ)

ORDER RE: APRIL 19, 2006 JOINT

DISCOVERY DISPUTE LETTER

The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint discovery dispute letter, filed April 19, 2006. 

Doc. #33. Upon review of the letter, it is unclear what relief the parties seek. Moreover, the letter

appears to address at least 15 separate disputes, all in the space of one five-page letter. To clarify

what they seek, the Court hereby ORDERS the parties to re-submit their disputes in a manner that

will more readily assist the Court in resolving them. Specifically, for each discovery request, the

propounding or objecting party shall state the specific relief they seek. As the April 19 letter

addresses requests for production, interrogatories, and requests for admission, the Court requests

that the parties file more than one joint letter, with each letter limited either by category of discovery

or by topic.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:05-cv-03526-SBA Document 35 Filed 04/20/06 Page 1 of 1