Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06031/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06031-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

BRIDGET BRADFORD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, )

et. al., )

) 

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1: 04 CV F 6031 AWI DLB P 

ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION 

[12]

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro per and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. On May 5, 2005, the Court entered an Order finding that

plaintiff’s amended complaint stated cognizable claims against defendants Suryadevera, Hodgdon,

Schoonard and Paine but failed to state cognizable claims against the other defendants. The Court

ordered plaintiff to either file an amended complaint within 30 days or notify the Court that she

wanted to proceed against defendants Suryadevera, Hodgdon, Schoonard and Paine only. On July

14, 2005, after not receiving a response from plaintiff, the Court entered Findings and

Case 1:04-cv-06031-AWI-DLB Document 18 Filed 07/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 2

Recommendations recommending that the action be dismissed for failure to obey the Court’s order.

On July 25, 2005, the Court received a response from plaintiff advising that she wanted to proceed

against defendants Suryadevera, Hodgdon, Schoonard and Paine only and that she did not want to

file an amended complaint. The response was dated May 21, 2005. It appears that plaintiff did

attempt to respond to the Court’s order in a timely fashion. Therefore, the Findings and

Recommendation issued July 14, 2005 are HEREBY VACATED. By separate Order, the Court will

direct plaintiff to submit the necessary documents for service on defendants Suryadevera, Hodgdon,

Schoonard and Paine and recommend that the remaining defendants be dismissed from this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2005 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06031-AWI-DLB Document 18 Filed 07/28/05 Page 2 of 2