Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06222/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06222-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL—No. C-07-06222 RMW

CCL

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 6/3/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEL FUSE INC., ELEC & ELTEK (USA)

CORPORATION, WURTH ELECTRONICS

MIDCOM, INC., XFMRS, INC.,

Defendants.

No. C-07-06222 RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL

[Re Docket No. 220]

A request to seal must establish that the document, or portions thereof, is privileged or

protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. Civ. L. R. 79-5(a). 

The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing of only sealable material. Id. 

Defendant E&E Magnetic Products Limited ("E&E Magnetic") moves to file under seal a

portion of its reply brief for its motion to dismiss as well as Exhibit A to the reply. E&E Magnetic

has represented that it seeks to file this material under seal because it has been designated

"Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Eltec & Eltek (USA) Corporation ("E&E USA"). Having

reviewed the material that E&E Magnetic seeks to file under seal, the court is unable to ascertain the

reason why E&E USA believes the information is confidential. The court therefore requests that

E&E USA submit within 5 days an identification of the portions of material that it feels is

Case 5:07-cv-06222-RMW Document 230 Filed 06/03/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL—No. C-07-06222 RMW

CCL 2

confidential and an explanation for why it is confidential. Absent a satisfactory explanation, the

court will deny the motion to seal.

DATED: 6/3/10

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:07-cv-06222-RMW Document 230 Filed 06/03/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL—No. C-07-06222 RMW

CCL 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

Juanita R. Brooks brooks@fr.com 

Limin Zheng zheng@fr.com 

John Cameron Adkisson jca@fr.com 

Michael J Kane kane@fr.com 

Michael J. Pape pape@fr.com 

William R. Woodford woodford@fr.com 

Counsel for Defendants:

Joshua L. Raskin jraskin@wolfblock.com 

Andrew P. Nemiroff anemiroff@cozen.com 

Martin C. Fliesler mcf@fdml.com 

Martin G. Raskin mraskin@cozen.com 

Rex Hwang rhwang@fdml.com 

Kent Andrew Lambert klambert@bakerdonelson.com 

Michael Joseph Powell mpowell@bakerdonelson.com 

Samuel F Miller smiller@bakerdonelson.com 

Sarah Katherine Casey skcasey@bakerdonelson.com 

Terry John Mollica tjm@cmlawoffices.com 

Harold C. Moore hcmoore@maginot.com 

Christopher Todd Norris todd.norris@bullivant.com 

David Moorman drmoorman@maginot.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 6/3/10 CCL

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:07-cv-06222-RMW Document 230 Filed 06/03/10 Page 3 of 3