Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02204/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02204-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROLAND ADAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2204 LKK JFM P

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed his second request for an extension of time to file objections to

the March 6, 2007 findings and recommendations and to oppose defendants’ March 15, 2007

motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff states the district court again continued his resentencing hearing to May 16, 2007.

On May 18, 2007, defendants filed an opposition to plaintiff’s request for

extension of time. Defendants contend plaintiff has failed to state any cause, other than the

continuation of his criminal sentencing, for seeking additional time as required by Fed. R. Civ. P.

6(b). Defendants note they reserved their motion for summary judgment on plaintiff at the

Sacramento County Jail on March 23, 2007. Defendants contend plaintiff can prosecute his

lawsuit from the County Jail. Defendants argue that plaintiff’s prior extension to June 15, 2007

granted plaintiff extensions of 77 days and 80 days, respectively. 

/////

Case 2:05-cv-02204-RRB -JFM Document 58 Filed 05/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Defendants further argue they will be prejudiced by further delay as trial will be

further delayed and “the more chance the defendants’ witnesses will depart and memories will

fade.” (Id. at 2-3.) 

No good cause appearing, the request will be denied without prejudice to renewal

upon a proper showing. Plaintiff’s extension to June 15, 2007 is confirmed. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s May 15, 2007 request for an extension of time is denied without

prejudice; and

2. No later than June 15, 2007, plaintiff shall file objections to the March 6, 2007

findings and recommendations and an opposition to defendants’ March 15, 2007 motion for

summary judgment. 

DATED: May 22, 2007.

/001/mp; adam2204.36sec

Case 2:05-cv-02204-RRB -JFM Document 58 Filed 05/23/07 Page 2 of 2