Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_90-cv-20114/USCOURTS-cand-3_90-cv-20114-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION TRUST

CORPORATION, as Receiver for

MERCURY SAVINGS AND

LOAN ASSOCIATION

 Plaintiff,

 v.

ANTHONY PAUL ROWE, et al. 

 Defendants.

____________________________

No. C 90-20114 FMS (WDB)

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING

ON ASSIGNEE/JUDGMENT

CREDITOR'S MOTION FOR WRIT

OF EXECUTION FOR ASSETS OF

REVOCABLE TRUST

On July 9, 2007, the Cadle Company ("Cadle"), an assigned judgment creditor

in this action, filed a Motion for Writ of Execution on assets of a revocable trust in

which judgment debtor, Anthony Paul Rowe ("Rowe"), is a settlor. Mr. Rowe's wife,

Nancy Rowe, also is a settlor of the revocable trust. Cadle's motion currently is set to

be heard on Wednesday, August 29, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. 

 Nancy Rowe has filed an Opposition to Cadle's Motion, in which she asserts

that most of the funds in the trust are her separate property, to which Mr. Rowe is not

legally entitled and on which Cadle has no legal right to execute. Mrs. Rowe also

asserts, with no legal support, that the remainder of the funds, though belonging to

Mr. and Mrs. Rowe as community property, are nevertheless exempt from execution. 

Mrs. Rowe did not provide an accounting or any tracing documents to

Case 3:90-cv-20114-FMS Document 1347 Filed 08/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 support her assertion that the funds in the trust are her separate property. Indeed, in

neither Cadle's Motion nor the Opposition is there any specific information about the

funds in the trust. Nancy Rowe did advise in her Opposition, however, that "a full

asset evaluation is being conducted." Opposition at 4. 

Accordingly, because the Court cannot adequately review or resolve Cadle's

Motion without a specific accounting of the funds in the trust, the Court CONTINUES 

the hearing to Wednesday, October 17, 2007, at 3:00 p.m. 

By no later than September 26, 2007, Nancy and Anthony Rowe must file a

Supplemental Opposition explaining their assertions about specific funds in the trust,

along with a supporting Declaration with a full accounting of all the funds in the trust. 

The accounting must include, at minimum, the amount and nature of the funds in the

trust, which of those funds are Mrs. Rowe's separate property and which of those

funds belong to the community. All factual assertions made in the brief and the

accounting about the funds in the trust must be supported with specific back up

documentation proving the factual assertion. In addition, in the event either Anthony

or Nancy Rowe wishes to claim an exemption from execution on any of the funds in

the trust, such a claim must be set forth in detail in the Rowe's brief with legal support

and adequate back up documentation to prove the character of the funds at issue. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August ___, 2007 WAYNE D. BRAZIL

United States Magistrate Judge

Copies: parties, WDB, Stats

Case 3:90-cv-20114-FMS Document 1347 Filed 08/22/07 Page 2 of 2