Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02515/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02515-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

PROTEGRITY USA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

NETSKOPE, INC.,

Defendant.

No. 3:15-cv-230 (SRU)

ORDER OF TRANSFER 

On February 18, 2015, plaintiff Protegrity USA, Inc. (“Protegrity”) filed this lawsuit 

against defendant Netskope, Inc. (“Netskope”), alleging that Netskope had infringed upon 

Protegrity’s patent. Compl. (doc. 1). Shortly thereafter, Netskope moved to dismiss the case for 

lack of personal jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), or in the alternative, to transfer this action 

to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). 

On May 5, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation (doc. 21) in which they consented to transfer this 

case to the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, stating that such a transfer 

would resolve the parties’ disputes regarding jurisdiction and forum non conveniens.

Accordingly, I approve the parties’ stipulation, and I order that, pursuant to 28 U.S.

Code sections 1404(b) and 1406(a), the Clerk shall transfer this case to the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division.

It is so ordered. 

Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 13th day of May 2015. 

 /s/ STEFAN R. UNDERHILL 

 Stefan R. Underhill

 United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cv-02515-YGR Document 22 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 1