Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06324/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06324-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALVIN RONNELL ROSS, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

VICKIE McCOY, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:99-cv-06324-REC-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 112)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 97)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff Alvin Ronnell Ross (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On July 22, 2005, the Magistrate Judge a filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On July 28, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations. Defendants

filed a reply to plaintiff’s objections on August 2, 2005.

Case 1:99-cv-06324-REC-LJO Document 119 Filed 09/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 22, 2005,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Defendants’ unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss,

filed November 12, 2004, is GRANTED; and,

3. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for

plaintiff’s failure to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:99-cv-06324-REC-LJO Document 119 Filed 09/15/05 Page 2 of 2