Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02171/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02171-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUTHER G. JAMISON,

Petitioner, 2:05-cv-2171-GEB-DAD-P

vs.

S.W. ORNOSKI, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 1, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations along with an amended petition for writ of

habeas corpus.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

Case 2:05-cv-02171-GEB-DAD Document 10 Filed 06/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

proper analysis. Petitioner’s amended petition does not substantially follow the standard form, as

required by Rule 2(d) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and does not demonstrate

exhaustion of state court remedies.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 1, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed without

prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedies.

Dated: June 5, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02171-GEB-DAD Document 10 Filed 06/06/06 Page 2 of 2