Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02126/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02126-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

Feezor v. Young Stone, Inc., et al. CIV.S-07-02126-MCE-CMK 

Stipulation Deeming Defendant’s Answer to Complaint Responsive to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Lary Feezor 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Young Stone, Inc., et al. 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. CIV.S-07-02126-MCE-CMK 

Stipulation Deeming Defendant 

Young Stone, Inc.’s Answer to 

Complaint as Responsive to 

Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint 

and [Proposed] Order 

Lynn Hubbard, III, SBN 69773 

Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV, SBN 212970 

Law Offices of Lynn Hubbard 

12 Williamsburg Lane 

Chico, CA 95926 

Telephone: (530) 895-3252 

Facsimile: (530) 894-8244 

Attorney for Plaintiff Lary Feezor 

Cris C Vaughan, SBN 99568 

Vaughan & Associates 

6207 South Walnut, Suite 800 

Loomis, CA 95650 

Telephone: (916) 660-8401 

Facsimile: (916) 788-1159 

Attorney for Defendant Young Stone, Inc. 

Case 2:07-cv-02126-MCE -CMK Document 12 Filed 11/27/07 Page 1 of 3
Feezor v. Young Stone, Inc., et al. CIV.S-07-02126-MCE-CMK 

Stipulation Deeming Defendant’s Answer to Complaint Responsive to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Plaintiff, Lary Feezor (“Plaintiff”) and defendant, Young Stone, Inc. 

(“Defendant”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as 

follows: 

1. Defendant was personally served with the Complaint on 

October 24, 2007; 

2. Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on November 5, 2007; 

3. Defendant, unaware of the filing of the Amended Complaint, 

filed its answer on November 14, 2007; 

4. All parties now are now in possession of and have read the 

Amended Complaint. 

5. As such, the parties hereby stipulate that Defendant’s answer 

filed on November 14, 2007 shall be deemed responsive to Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint. 

Dated: November 19, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD 

 

 /s/ Lynn Hubbard, III, Esquire 

 LYNN HUBBARD, III 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Lary Feezor 

Dated: November 14, 2007 VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES 

 

 /s/ Cris C. Vaughan, Esquire 

 CRIS C. VAUGHAN 

 Attorney for Defendant Young Stone, Inc. 

Case 2:07-cv-02126-MCE -CMK Document 12 Filed 11/27/07 Page 2 of 3
Feezor v. Young Stone, Inc., et al. CIV.S-07-02126-MCE-CMK 

Stipulation Deeming Defendant’s Answer to Complaint Responsive to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER

 Having read the foregoing stipulation, the Court grants the parties’ 

request and deems Defendant Young Stone, Inc.’s November 14, 2007 

answer responsive to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: November 27, 2007

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-02126-MCE -CMK Document 12 Filed 11/27/07 Page 3 of 3