Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00775/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00775-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Philip J. Syzemore,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 05-0775 MCE PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

Board of Prison Terms, et al.,

Respondents.

-oOoPetitioner alleges his constitutional right to due process

was violated in connection with California parole proceedings. 

Respondent moved July 5, 2005, to dismiss based on the

district court’s ruling in Sass v. California Bd. of Prison

Terms, 376 F. Supp. 2d 975 (E.D. Cal. 2005). July 27, 2005,

petitioner opposed.

This case is assigned to the same district judge who decided

Sass. Therefore, although that decision is pending on appeal, I 

///

Case 2:05-cv-00775-MCE -EFB Document 16 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

hereby recommend that respondent’s July 5, 2005, motion be

granted and this action be dismissed.

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: November 22, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00775-MCE -EFB Document 16 Filed 11/23/05 Page 2 of 2