Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02553/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02553-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 1 Petitioner’s requests were denied because his notice of appeal was not timely.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLENN FITZGERALD PADGETT, No. CIV S-03-2553-GEB-CMK-P

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

ROBERT HERNANDEZ, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, was proceeding in this court with

petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Judgement denying

petitioner’s petition was entered on March 21, 2005. Petitioner filed a notice of appeal on May

18, 2005. Petitioner filed a supplemental notice of appeal and a request for a certificate of

appealability (“COA”) on August 29, 2005. Petitioner’s request for a COA was denied by this

court on December 7, 2005, and by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on March 7, 2006.1 

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:03-cv-02553-GEB -CMK Document 63 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On September 26, 2005, petitioner filed a document entitled “Motion for

Summary Judgment” (Doc. 49) and a document entitled “Motion for Relief From Judgment”

(Doc. 50). On November 30, 2005, petitioner filed a document entitled “Request for Entry of

Default” (Doc. 52) and a document entitled “Request for Case Status Report” (Doc. 53). 

Finally, on January 17, 2006, petitioner filed a document entitled “Notice of Reporter’s

Transcript” (Doc. 60), apparently seeking production at court expense of transcripts on appeal. 

Because all these documents were filed after judgement was entered and after petitioner filed a

request for a COA, they will be disregarded and the Clerk of the Court will be directed to

terminate these matters as motions pending on the court’s docket. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Docs. 49, 50, 52, 53, and 60 are all disregarded; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate these matters as motions

pending on the court’s docket.

DATED: August 30, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-02553-GEB -CMK Document 63 Filed 08/30/06 Page 2 of 2