Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00664/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00664-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRADLEY JAMES MROZEK,

Plaintiff,

v.

PATRICK EATON, et al.,

 Defendants.

No. 1:24-cv-00664-KES-SAB (PC)

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW 

CAUSE 

(ECF No. 18)

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. 

On July 29, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found no cognizable claim, 

and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff has not 

filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. Accordingly, on 

September 9, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be 

dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with a court order, and failure to state a 

cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 19.) 

On September 27, 2024, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 19.) 

Inasmuch as Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint and explained that the delay in filing 

was due to obtaining assistance with drafting the amended complaint, the Court will discharge the 

Case 1:24-cv-00664-KES-SAB Document 20 Filed 10/01/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

order to show cause. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the order to show cause issued 

on September 9, 2024, is DISCHARGED. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will screen the first 

amended complaint in due course. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 1, 2024 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:24-cv-00664-KES-SAB Document 20 Filed 10/01/24 Page 2 of 2