Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-03003/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-03003-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL RODMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAFEWAY INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 11-cv-03003-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Motion to decertify the class 3/2/2015

Opposition to motion to decertify 3/23/2015

Close of fact discovery 3/27/2015

Deadline to complete mediation 3/27/2015

Reply to opposition to motion to decertify 4/6/2015

Designation of experts 4/10/2015

Hearing on motion to decertify 4/23/2015

Rebuttal expert designation 4/24/2015

Expert discovery deadline 5/6/2015

Damages summary judgment motion 5/15/2015

Case 3:11-cv-03003-JST Document 233 Filed 01/28/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Damages summary judgment opposition 5/29/2015

Damages summary judgment reply 6/5/2015

Damages summary judgment hearing 6/18/2015

Pretrial conference statement 9/11/15

Pretrial conference 9/11/2015 at 2:00 

p.m.

Trial 10/5/2015 at 8:30 

a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) Five

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2015

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:11-cv-03003-JST Document 233 Filed 01/28/15 Page 2 of 2