Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-05978/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-05978-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 690
Nature of Suit: Other Forfeiture and Penalty Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1341 Complaint for Forfeiture

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

JERRY Y. FONG, ESQ. (SBN 99673)

CAREY & CAREY

706 COWPER STREET

P.O. BOX 1040

PALO ALTO, CA 94302-1040

650/328-5510

650/853-3632 fax

Attorneys for Claimants and Real Parties In Interest

SANG YE HAN & ROBERT WONG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CASE NO. C 02-5978 JW

)

Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES 

) TO CONTINUE THE DATE FOR 

vs. ) FILING OF THE GOVERNMENT’S

) REPLY BRIEF AND THE HEARING

FUNDS SEIZED FROM FIVE ) ON THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY

ACCOUNTS HELD IN THE NAME OF ) JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

KYUNG HEE HAN, ET. AL., )

)

Defendants. ) )

Pursuant to the Plaintiff’s request, the parties jointly stipulate and request that the Court

continue the hearing for Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment from January 14, 2008 to January

28, 2008, and to extend the briefing schedule accordingly, so that Plaintiff’s reply to Defendant’s

opposition (filed on January 1, 2008) will be filed on or before January 15, 2008. 

Because Defendants’ opposition was filed one day late, on January 1, 2008, this extension

will give counsel for Plaintiff adequate time to review that opposition and prepare the reply brief.

In addition, counsel for Plaintiff will be out of town and unavailable from January 8-11, 2008.

///

///

///

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge James Ware

1/4/2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:02-cv-05978-JW Document 67 Filed 01/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

DATED: January 4, 2007 CAREY & CAREY

 /s/ 

JERRY Y. FONG, Attorneys for Claimants and

Real Parties In Interest: SANG YE HAN & 

ROBERT WONG

DATED: January 4, 2007 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 /s/ 

STEPHANIE HINDS, AUSA, Attorney for 

Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing herein, it is hereby ordered that

the motion for summary judgment currently scheduled on January 14, 2008 be continued until

January 28, 2008, at 9:00 am. Further, the government’s reply brief will be filed on or before

January 15, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 

JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT

 ORDERED AS MODIFIED: 

 The Court DENIES the parties' request for further continuance. The Court notes that 

parties have made mulitple continuances of this matter. The Court GRANTS a ONE (1) day 

extension for the Government to file a reply brief. The Government shall file a reply brief no 

later than January 8, 2008. The parties shall appear for oral argument on January 14, 2007 at 

9:00 AM Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Due to the age of the case, the Court will not 

entertain further requests for continuace. 

January 4, 2007

Case 5:02-cv-05978-JW Document 67 Filed 01/04/08 Page 2 of 2