Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_93-cv-00306/USCOURTS-caed-2_93-cv-00306-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Webster v. Ornoski, CIV S 93-0306 LKK DAD DP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY J. WEBSTER, )

)

Petitioner, )

 )

vs. )

 )

S.W. ORNOSKI, )

)

Warden of the California State Prison )

at San Quentin, )

 )

Respondent. )

)

 _ _ __________________________________)

No. CIV S-93-0306 LKK DAD DP

DEATH PENALTY CASE

REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

ORDER 

Respondent has filed a motion requesting a modification of the briefing schedule

set by the court on October 28, 2009, with respect to petitioner’s appellate process claim and for

leave to file a response to petitioner’s Brief in Support of Select Habeas Claims filed November

30, 2009. Counsel for petitioner objects to the latter request on the grounds that it was

respondent who insisted on filing on answer with respect to those select habeas claims rather

than to proceed first with petitioner’s final briefing of those claims. 

Petitioner’s counsel is correct with respect to the substance of their opposition

since the court set the schedule in question at respondent’s request. Moreover, petitioner’s brief

which respondent now wishes to reply to was only twenty-two pages in length. Nonetheless, 

/////

Case 2:93-cv-00306-LKK-DAD Document 437 Filed 01/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 Webster v. Ornoski, CIV S 93-0306 LKK DAD DP

respondent’s motion will be granted with limitations. The briefing schedule is modified to

provide as follows:

1. Respondent shall file a post-evidentiary hearing brief on petitioner’s claim that

he was denied meaningful appellate review on or before February 1, 2010. Petitioner may file a

reply with respect to this claim, if any, on or before February 21, 2010. No further briefing on

this claim shall be submitted absent further order of the court.

2. Respondent will be permitted to file a response brief to petitioner’s brief in

support of select habeas claims on or before February 15, 2010. That brief shall not exceed ten

pages in length. Petitioner may file a reply brief, if any, on or before March 1, 2010. Such a

reply brief shall not exceed five pages in length. No further briefing on this issue shall be

submitted absent further order of the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: January 11, 2010.

Ddad1/orders.capital/webster0306.revsched.011010

Case 2:93-cv-00306-LKK-DAD Document 437 Filed 01/11/10 Page 2 of 2