Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01744/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01744-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARMANDO HERRERA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1744 GEB EFB P

vs.

GARDNER, et al., 

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. On October 19, 2010, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state

a cognizable claim. The dismissal order explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30

days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure

to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for

failure to state a claim. 

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

////

////

////

Case 2:10-cv-01744-GEB-EFB Document 24 Filed 01/04/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to

state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 4, 2011.

Case 2:10-cv-01744-GEB-EFB Document 24 Filed 01/04/11 Page 2 of 2