Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00620/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00620-39/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL IOANE, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

KENT SPJUTE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

_______________________________________)

Case No. 1:07-cv-00620-AWI-GSA

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR ORDER DEEMING 

MATTERS ADMITTED

(ECF No. 212)

Plaintiffs Michael and Shelly Ioane are a married couple involved in tax disputes with the 

United States. Current defendants are Jean Nole, Jeff Hodges, and Brian Applegate, federal 

agents who assisted in searching Plaintiffs‟ residence in 2006 (“Defendants”). Mr. Ioane was 

convicted of tax fraud conspiracy on October 3, 2011 as a result, in part, of evidence that was 

obtained during the search. On March 10, 2014, Plaintiff Michael Ioane filed a Motion 

requesting the Court to deem requests for admissions admitted. (ECF No. 212.) Defendants 

oppose this Motion. (ECF No. 216.) The Court has reviewed the papers and determined that this 

matter is suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). Based on a 

review of the pleadings, Plaintiff‟s motion is DENIED.

Case 1:07-cv-00620-AWI-EPG Document 298 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36 provides that “[a] party may serve on any other party 

a written request to admit, for purposes of the pending action only, the truth of any matter within 

the scope of Rule 26(b)(1) relating to: (A) facts, the application of law to fact, or opinions about 

either; and (B) the genuineness of any described documents.” If the responding party fails to 

serve a written answer or objection within thirty days “after being served,” the matter is deemed 

admitted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a)(3). A matter that is admitted is “conclusively established unless 

the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission.” Switchmusic.com, Inc. 

v. U.S. Music Corp., 416 F.Supp.2d 812, 817 (C.D. Cal. 2006) (“The 30 day time period for 

responding to requests for admission begins to run on the date on which the requests were 

delivered „to the agency designated to make delivery,‟ and not on the date the answering party 

receives them‟”). 

Plaintiff served the twenty-four requests for admissions at issue on January 27, 2014 and 

Defendants received those requests on February 3, 2014. On February 26, 2014, Defendants 

served responses to the requests for admissions on Plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that he did not 

receive any response to the requests as of March 6, 2014. (Motion 2, ECF No. 212.) However, he 

appears to have received them by March 10, 2014; the responses are attached as exhibits to a 

different discovery motion filed shortly thereafter. (Motion to Compel Interrogatories Exhs. A-E, 

ECF No. 213.) Moreover, Rule 36 only requires that responses be “served” within thirty days, 

not that they be received within that period.1 Defendants‟ responses were thus timely and no 

matters will be deemed admitted because of any failure to respond.

 

1 Defendants would also have received an additional three days to respond, assuming service was accomplished via 

U.S. mail. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d).

Case 1:07-cv-00620-AWI-EPG Document 298 Filed 04/24/15 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff‟s Motion to Deem Admissions 

Admitted (ECF No. 212) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 23, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00620-AWI-EPG Document 298 Filed 04/24/15 Page 3 of 3