Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02448/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02448-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Agustin Solis-Valencia, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Katrina S. Kane, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-2448-PHX-ROS

ORDER

On December 3, 2007, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 1).

 On April 25, 2008, Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin issued a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure

to prosecute. (Doc. 12). Petitioner has not filed objections.

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is “clear that the

district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if

objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1126 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, 'but not otherwise.”'). District

courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject

Case 2:07-cv-02448-ROS Document 14 Filed 05/13/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). No objection having been

made, the Court will adopt the R&R in full. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) is ADOPTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED

and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be terminated.

DATED this 13th day of May, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02448-ROS Document 14 Filed 05/13/08 Page 2 of 2