Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06221/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06221-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARION MAKAJ, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCRIBNER, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06221-REC-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 9), 

DISMISSING ACTION AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS 

Plaintiff, Marion Makaj (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On March 9, 2006, the Court issued an Order dismissing the

Complaint with leave to amend for Plaintiff’s failure to state a

claim on which relief could be granted. Plaintiff did not,

however, file an Amended Complaint. Thus, on April 19, 2006, the

Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations which were

served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that

any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be

filed within twenty (20) days. To date, plaintiff has not filed

Case 1:04-cv-06221-REC -SMS Document 10 Filed 05/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 19, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action is DISMISSED based on plaintiff’s failure

to obey the court’s order of March 9, 2006, pursuant to Local

Rule 11-110, and for failure to state a claim on which relief can

be granted;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment

for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 26, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06221-REC -SMS Document 10 Filed 05/30/06 Page 2 of 2