Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01738/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01738-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035

MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: service@mission.legal

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jose Acosta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ACOSTA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DAVID PEREZ dba SUMNER’S SCHWINN 

BICYCLE SHOP, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-cv-01738-LJO-SAB

SECOND STIPULATION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS RICHARD S. EMLER 

AND HONORINA EMLER TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

Case 1:16-cv-01738-LJO-SAB Document 13 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 3
Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Jose Acosta (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorneys of record, 

and Defendants Richard S. Emler and Honorina Emler (“Defendants,” and together with 

Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, previously entered into a 

stipulation granting Defendants to and including January 9, 2017 to file a responsive pleading 

in this matter (Dkt. 8);

WHEREAS, the Parties, along with defendants David Perez and Linda Perez, both dba 

Sumner’s Schwinn Bicycle Shop, have reached an agreement to settle the matter and a 

settlement agreement has been circulated for signatures, and the Parties desire to conserve 

attorney’s fees which would be incurred in filing the responsive pleading while they finalize the 

settlement;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties 

that Defendants may have to and including January 31, 2017 to file a responsive pleading in 

this matter. This extension of time does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already 

fixed by Court order, including the due date of the joint scheduling report which will also be 

filed on January 31, 2017 in the event the settlement is not finalized.

Dated: January 19, 2017 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jose Acosta

Dated: January 19, 2017 KAPETAN BROTHERS, LLP

/s/ Marc N. Kapetan

 Marc N. Kapetan

Attorney for Defendants 

Richard S. Emler and Honorina Emler

Case 1:16-cv-01738-LJO-SAB Document 13 Filed 01/19/17 Page 2 of 3
Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants, Richard S. Emler and Honorina Emler, 

shall have to and including January 31, 2017 within which to file a responsive pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 19, 2017 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01738-LJO-SAB Document 13 Filed 01/19/17 Page 3 of 3