Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00086/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00086-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Defendant Lankford also moved for an extension of time. However, default has been entered against him 1

and his motion to set aside default has not yet been deemed submitted. Local Rule 78-230(m).

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRYAN E. RANSOM,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00086-OWW-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE A RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT

(Doc. 67)

On August 24, 2007, defendants Adams, Alameida, Arroyo, Atkinson, Bennett, Burruel,

Cabral, Carey, Case, Cheema, DeGroot, Diaz, Duran, Flores, Hulsey, Johnson, Mayo, McDowell,

Meske, Pear, Pina, Pliler, Rosario, Santos, Scribner, Stockman, Tennison, Vance, Bremner, and

Kalvelage (“defendants”) filed a motion seeking a thirty-day extension of time to file a response to

the complaint.

Good cause having been shown, defendants’ motion is HEREBY GRANTED, and

defendants have thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order within which to file a

response.

1

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 10, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00086-OWW -GSA Document 72 Filed 09/10/07 Page 1 of 1