Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03326/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03326-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 53655777.2 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: MOTIONS, ETC.

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-06-03326-SBA 

JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

55 Second Street, 24th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 856-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 

jeffwohl@paulhastings.com 

STEPHEN H. HARRIS (Cal. State Bar No. 184608) 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Telephone: (213) 683-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 

stephenharris@paulhastings.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Los Alamos National Security, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNIVERSITY PROFESSIONAL AND 

TECHNICAL EMPLOYEES, CWA 

LOCAL 9119, AFL-CIO; RICHARD 

MONTOYA; CATHERINE CHAPMAN; 

THOMAS MARKS; and MANUEL 

TRUJILLO, 

Plaintiffs/Petitioners, 

vs. 

BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE 

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; LOS 

ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC; 

and DOES 1 TO 40, inclusive, 

Defendants/Respondents 

No. C-06-03326-SBA 

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING 

BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR 

PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS AND RESETTING 

CASE MANAGEMENT DATES 

Case 4:06-cv-03326-SBA Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 53655777.2 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: MOTIONS, ETC.

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-06-03326-SBA 

STIPULATION 

Plaintiffs University Professional and Technical Employees, CWA Local 9119, AFL-CIO; 

Richard Montoya; Catherine Chapman; Thomas Marks; and Manual Trujillo, and defendants The 

Regents of the University of California and Los Alamos National Security, LLC, acting through their 

respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. This action was commenced in California Superior Court, Alameda County (the 

“Superior Court”), on April 18, 2006, and removed to this Court on May 19, 2006. 

2. Defendants’ response to plaintiffs’ complaint was due on June 19, 2006. 

3. On May 31, 2006, plaintiffs e-filed a First Amended Complaint. 

4. Plaintiffs intend to move to remand this action to the Superior Court. Defendants intend 

to bring motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. 

5. After conferring, the parties wish to coordinate the scheduling of their respective motions 

to avoid conflicts with the Court’s hearing availability and their calendars. 

6. Accordingly, the parties have agreed and respectfully request that the Court approve the 

following briefing and hearing schedule for their respective motions: 

July 28, 2006: Plaintiffs to e-file their motion to remand. 

Defendants to e-file their motions to dismiss (the due date for 

defendants’ response to plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint 

would be extended to this date) 

August 25, 2006: Parties to e-file their oppositions to the pending motions 

September 12, 2006: Parties to e-file their replies in support of their respective motions. 

September 26, 2006: Hearing on parties’ respective motions (1:00 p.m.) 

7. Because these motions should be decided before the parties embark on case management 

proceedings, the parties further have agreed and respectfully request that the Court reset the case 

management dates previously set in this action as follows: 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 4:06-cv-03326-SBA Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 53655777.2

-2- STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: MOTIONS, ETC.

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-06-03326-SBA 

 November 2, 2006: Last day for parties to meet and confer regarding initial 

disclosures, early settlement, ADR processes, and discovery; last 

day for parties to file ADR certification and either stipulation to 

ADR process or notice of need for ADR telephone conference 

November 22, 2006: Last day for parties to complete their initial disclosures or state 

objections in Rule 26(f) report, file case management statement 

and Rule 26(f) report 

December 4, 2006: Initial case management conference (3:00 p.m.) 

8. By entering into this stipulation, the parties do not waive any objection, claim, or defense 

they may have. 

Dated: June ___, 2006. PETER W. SALTZMAN 

ARTHUR A. KRANTZ 

LEONARD CARDER, LLP 

By: ____________________________________________ 

Arthur A. Krantz 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

University Professional and Technical Employees, 

CWA Local 9119, AFL-CIO; Richard Montoya; 

Catherine Chapman; Thomas Marks; and 

Manual Trujillo 

Dated: June ___, 2006. MARY C. OPPEDAHL 

REED SMITH LLP 

By: ____________________________________________ 

Mary C. Oppedahl 

Attorneys for Defendant 

The Regents of the University of California 

Case 4:06-cv-03326-SBA Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 53655777.2

-3- STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: MOTIONS, ETC.

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-06-03326-SBA 

Dated: June ___, 2006. JEFFREY D. WOHL 

STEPHEN H. HARRIS 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

By: ____________________________________________ 

Jeffrey D. Wohl 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Los Alamos National Security, Inc. 

Case 4:06-cv-03326-SBA Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 53655777.2

-4- STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: MOTIONS, ETC.

U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-06-03326-SBA 

ORDER

Based on the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Court adopts the following briefing and hearing schedule for the 

parties’ planned motions to remand and to dismiss, and resets case management proceedings, as follows: 

July 28, 2006: Plaintiffs to e-file their motion to remand. 

Defendants to e-file their motions to dismiss (the due date for 

defendants’ response to plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is 

hereby extended to this date) 

August 25, 2006: Parties to e-file their oppositions to the pending motions 

September 12, 2006: Parties to e-file their replies in support of their respective motions. 

September 26, 2006: Hearing on parties’ respective motions (1:00 p.m.) 

November 2, 2006: Last day for parties to meet and confer regarding initial 

disclosures, early settlement, ADR processes, and discovery; last 

day for parties to file ADR certification and either stipulation to 

ADR process or notice of need for ADR telephone conference 

November 22, 2006: Last day for parties to complete their initial disclosures or state 

objections in Rule 26(f) report, file case management statement 

and Rule 26(f) report 

December 4, 2006: Initial case management conference set for 2:30 p.m., via 

telephone. Plaintiff’s counsel is to set up the conference call with 

all the parties on the line and call chambers at (510) 637-3559. 

Dated: June 12, 2006. 

_________________________________________ 

Saundra Brown Armstrong 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:06-cv-03326-SBA Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 5 of 5