Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-2_19-cv-00140/USCOURTS-ared-2_19-cv-00140-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

DELTA DIVISION 

CRAYTONIA BADGER 

ADC #162710 PETITIONER 

v. No. 2:19-cv-140-DPM 

BUREAU OF PRISONS RESPONDENT 

ORDER 

The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's unopposed 

recommendation as modified. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to 

advisory committee notes). The modification: the Court is not inclined 

to reach the exhaustion issue when the Bureau has not invoked that 

defense and acknowledges that Badger doesn't yet have access to the 

federal administrative remedy process. Doc. 7 at 4. Nonetheless, the 

Court agrees that Badger's challenge is premature. When Badger enters 

BOP custody, the Bureau will compute the time remaining on his 

federal sentence. If Badger disagrees with that calculation, then he may 

exhaust his administrative remedies and file a petition for a writ of 

habeas corpus in the appropriate Court at that time. But until that 

computation is completed, this challenge is premature. Badger's 

petition will therefore be dismissed without prejudice. 

Case 2:19-cv-00140-DPM Document 10 Filed 04/14/20 Page 1 of 2
So Ordered. 

{/ 

D .P. Marshall Jr. 

United States District Judge 

-2-

Case 2:19-cv-00140-DPM Document 10 Filed 04/14/20 Page 2 of 2