Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-05674/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-05674-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 891
Nature of Suit: Agricultural Acts
Cause of Action: 07:499 Agricultural Commodities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INTERFRESH, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WASIL OBAID, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 18-cv-05674-EMC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Docket No. 36

Plaintiffs assert that Defendants have stopped making payments due under the parties’ 

settlement agreement and are therefore in default. Docket No. 36. Plaintiffs accordingly request 

the Court to enter judgment against Defendants in the amount of $126,989.46. Id.

The parties’ settlement agreement provides that:

Upon DEFENDANTS’ default of this Agreement, PLAINTIFFS 

shall be entitled to immediately enter and enforce a judgment 

against Defendants, jointly and severally, on an ex parte basis in the 

District Court Action. Said judgment shall be for the full Settlement 

Amount due as alleged herein plus all accrued interest, and filing 

fees, plus any additional fees and costs incurred in obtaining said 

judgment, less all payments received prior to default. 

Docket No. 33-1 ¶ 6. Per this provision, Defendants’ right to object to entry of judgment is 

limited to “the following grounds and no others: (a) whether default has in fact occurred; (b) 

whether the sums acknowledged by Plaintiffs as having been received prior to default are accurate; 

and, (c) whether the amount due under the judgment is accurate.” Id. The Ninth Circuit has also 

held that defendants may raise disputes regarding the formation, existence, or terms of the 

settlement agreement. See Callie v. Near, 829 F.2d 888, 890 (9th Cir. 1987).

Defendants are hereby ORDERED to show cause why default should not be entered 

against them. The deadline for Defendants to file a response is July 24, 2019. The parties shall 

Case 3:18-cv-05674-EMC Document 37 Filed 07/09/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

attend a hearing on August 1, 2019 at 1:30 PM, in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate 

Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. If Defendants fail to file a response, default will be entered 

against them in accordance with Plaintiffs’ motion and the settlement agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 9, 2019

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:18-cv-05674-EMC Document 37 Filed 07/09/19 Page 2 of 2