Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00171/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00171-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

DAVID MADDOX,

Plaintiff,

v.

B. ORNELLAS,

Defendant.

1:13-cv-00171 BAM

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(ECF No. 45)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff David Maddox (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action currently proceeds on 

Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant B. Ornellas for deliberate indifference to serious medical 

needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 

On May 19, 2016, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. 

(ECF No. 28.) Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for 

summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir.2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 

952, 957 (9th Cir.1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411–12 (9th Cir.1988). (ECF No. 

28, pp. 19-22.) Plaintiff’s opposition was due within twenty-one (21) days of service of 

Case 1:13-cv-00171-BAM Document 47 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants’ motion. More than thirty (30) days have passed since the motion for summary 

judgment was filed and served, but Plaintiff has not filed any opposition or statement of nonopposition to the motion. Nor has Plaintiff made any other communications with the Court.

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a 

statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion within thirty (30) days. Plaintiff is warned 

that the failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action, with 

prejudice, for failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00171-BAM Document 47 Filed 06/20/16 Page 2 of 2