Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04582/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04582-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE AMENDED PLEADINGS AND 

WITHDRAWAL OF MOTIONS 

CASE NO. CV 07-4582 MJJ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

O-NET COMMUNICATIONS 

(SHENZHEN) LIMITED, MULTIWAVE 

DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, INC., 

CHUNMENG WU, an individual, 

Defendants. 

Case No. CV 07-4582 MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE FILING OF AMENDED PLEADINGS AND 

WITHDRAWAL OF MOTIONS ON 

CALENDAR FOR NOVEMBER 27, 2007 

Case 4:07-cv-04582-SBA Document 34 Filed 11/20/07 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE AMENDED PLEADINGS AND 

WITHDRAWAL OF MOTIONS 

1 CASE NO. CV 07-4582 MJJ 

WHEREAS, on August 24, 2007, plaintiff Oplink Communications, Inc. (“Oplink”) filed 

a First Amended Complaint in this action against defendants O-Net Communications (Shenzhen) 

Limited (“O-Net Shenzhen”), Multiwave Digital Solutions, Inc. (“Multiwave”), and Chunmeng 

Wu (collectively “O-Net”); 

WHEREAS, on September 17, 2007, O-Net filed its Answer and Counterclaims. O-Net 

Shenzhen and Multiwave concurrently filed a Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike [Docket 

No. 11] (“Motion to Dismiss”); 

WHEREAS, on October 9, 2007, Oplink filed a Motion to Strike Defendants’ 

Affirmative Defenses and Dismiss Their Counterclaims [Docket No. 19] (“Motion to Strike”); 

WHEREAS, all briefing has been completed and both motions are currently on calendar 

for hearing before the Court on November 27, 2007; 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and have consented to each party filing 

amended pleadings to resolve the parties’ respective motions; 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties to the above-entitled action, by and through their 

attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. Defendants consent, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), to Plaintiff 

filing its Second Amended Complaint in the form attached as Exhibit A; 

2. O-Net Shenzhen’s and Multiwave’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 11] be taken 

off calendar; 

3. Plaintiff consents, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), to 

Defendants filing their First Amended Answer and Counterclaims in the form attached as Exhibit 

B; and 

4. Oplink’s Motion to Strike [Docket No. 19] be taken off calendar. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 4:07-cv-04582-SBA Document 34 Filed 11/20/07 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE AMENDED PLEADINGS AND 

WITHDRAWAL OF MOTIONS 

2 CASE NO. CV 07-4582 MJJ 

/ / / 

Dated: November 19, 2007 WHITE & CASE LLP 

By: /s/ Sam O’Rourke 

 Sam O’Rourke 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: November 19, 2007 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Carolyn Chang 

 Carolyn Chang 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED. 

Dated: November ___, 2007 

 Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

 United States District Judge 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

20

Case 4:07-cv-04582-SBA Document 34 Filed 11/20/07 Page 3 of 3