Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01793/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01793-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 06 1793 JF RS

PROTECTIVE ORDER

(DPSAGOK)

 **E-filed 4/4/06**

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

PACIFIC NEWS SERVICE,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

Jeanne S. WOODFORD, Acting Secretary of the

California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation; Eddie S. Ylst, Acting Warden of

San Quentin State Prison; and Does 1-50,

 Defendants.

Case Number C 06 1793 JF RS

DEATH-PENALTY CASE

PROTECTIVE ORDER

In the related action of Morales v. Woodford, Nos. C 06 219 JF RS & C 06 926 JF RS,

the Court has entered a protective order (docket no. 126). The Court deems it appropriate to

enter a corresponding protective order in the present action.

Accordingly, and good cause therefor appearing, the Court hereby enters this Protective

Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the name, address, date and place of birth, Social

Security number, rank, job description (to the extent that it is not directly related to being a

member of the execution team), race, color, religion, ethnicity, sex, age, sexual orientation,

gender, physical description, and any other identifying information of any member of the

execution team that is revealed to Plaintiff’s attorneys in the course of the present litigation and

Case 3:06-cv-01793-RS Document 27 Filed 04/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Such authorization may be sought from and granted by the assigned magistrate judge.

2

Case No. C 06 1793 JF RS

PROTECTIVE ORDER

(DPSAGOK)

that is not otherwise publicly available shall be “Protected Information” pursuant to this

Protective Order.

Protected Information is and shall remain confidential: it shall be revealed to and used by

only Plaintiff’s attorneys. Plaintiff’s attorneys shall not disclose Protected Information to anyone

without first obtaining express authorization to do so from the Court.1 A violation of this

Protective Order by any attorney may be punished by the Court as a contempt.

In the event that a party wishes to submit to the Court briefs or other materials that

disclose Protected Information, the party shall do so under seal via e-mail to

g_o_kolombatovich@cand.uscourts.gov. However, copies of such materials shall be e-filed in

the public record with the Protected Information deleted and such deletion noted as made

pursuant to this Protective Order.

This Protective Order shall continue in effect after the conclusion of the present action. 

The parties may request modification of this Protective Order upon entry of final judgment in the

present action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 4, 2006 __________________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01793-RS Document 27 Filed 04/04/06 Page 2 of 2