Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-mc-80288/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-mc-80288-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EEON,

Petitioner,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 

- OFFICE OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS, et al.,

Respondents.

Case No. 19-mc-80288-KAW

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND MOTION 

TO STRIKE

Re: Dkt. Nos. 4, 5

On December 5, 2019, Petitioner Eeon, f.k.a. Brett Jones, filed a motion to confirm a $600 

million arbitration award purportedly entered against various California and federal government 

entities and officials. (Dkt. No. 1.) On January 8, 2020, the California Respondents filed an 

opposition, in which they requested that the Court vacate the arbitration award. (Dkt. No. 2.)

On January 17, 2020, the Court denied Petitioner’s motion to confirm and vacated the 

“arbitration award.” (Order, Dkt. No. 3.) The Court explained that the arbitration award was not 

valid because there was no agreement to arbitrate. (Id. at 2.) Further, the Court found that 

arbitration award had to be vacated, observing that “multiple courts around the country have 

expressed doubts regarding Sitcomm’s validity” and that the arbitration award was devoid of “any 

fact-finding” and contained “nonsensical” terms. (Id. (internal quotation omitted); see also id. at 

3-4.)

On January 31, 2020, Petitioner filed a “Motion for Default and Default Judgment” against 

federal Respondents, the Superior Court of California, and the Judicial Council of California. 

(Pet.’s Mot. for Default J., Dkt. No. 4.) Petitioner also filed a Motion to Strike the California 

Respondents’ filing. (Pet.’s Mot. to Strike, Dkt. No. 5.)

The Court has already vacated the purported arbitration award. (See Order at 4.) 

Case 4:19-mc-80288-KAW Document 6 Filed 02/07/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Accordingly, Petitioner’s motions are DENIED as moot.

Any future filings by Petitioner relating to the purported arbitration award will be 

summarily denied as moot. This miscellaneous matter is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 7, 2020

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:19-mc-80288-KAW Document 6 Filed 02/07/20 Page 2 of 2