Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00032/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00032-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Charles David Clegg, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph M. Arpaio, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV06-0032-PHX-SRB

ORDER

Plaintiff, Charles David Clegg, filed his Civil Rights Complaint on January 4, 2006.

On January 20, 2006, this Court issued an order advising Plaintiff to complete and return a

service packet for Defendant by February 9, 2006. On March 23, 2006 the Court issued an

order to show cause giving Plaintiff until April 5, 2006 to show cause why this case should

not be dismissed. On May 10, 2006 the Court issued another order to show cause giving

Plaintiff until May 18, 2006 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. Plaintiff

did not respond to either order to show cause order and Plaintiff's copy of the May 18, 2006

order was returned by the Post Office with the notation "Released 2/2/06."

On June 12 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed her Report and Recommendation

recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to

prosecute.

In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

Case 2:06-cv-00032-SRB-GEE Document 11 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The

Court notes that on June 21, 2006 Plaintiff's copy of the Report and Recommendation was

also returned by the Post Office with the notation "Released 2/2/06." Plaintiff has not filed

a change of address with the Court.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case without prejudice for failure to

prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter Judgment accordingly.

DATED this 6th day of July, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00032-SRB-GEE Document 11 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2