Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01212/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01212-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA2:833642.1 [PROPOSED] PRE-TRIAL ORDER NO. 1

C 06-01665, C-06-02915, C-07-01200, 

C-07-01207, C-07-01212 & C-07-01381 

KENNETH R. O’ROURKE (S.B. #120144)

korourke@omm.com 

PAUL B. SALVATY (S.B. #171507)

psalvaty@omm.com 

STEVEN H. BERGMAN (S.B. #180542)

sbergman@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

400 South Hope Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899 

Telephone: (213) 430-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 

MICHAEL F. TUBACH (S.B. #145955)

mtubach@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Hynix Semiconductor Inc. and Hynix 

Semiconductor America Inc. in the Sun/Unisys, Edge, Jaco and All-American actions 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor 

Inc., et al. 

Case No. C-06-01665-PJH 

Unisys Corporation v. Hynix Semicondcutor 

Inc., et al. 

Case No. C-06-02915-PJH 

Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor 

Inc., et al. 

Case No. C-07-01212-PJH 

Edge Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor 

Inc., et al. 

Case No. C-07-01207-PJH 

Case No. C 06-01665-PJH 

(Consolidated) 

Case No. C-06-02915-PJH 

Case No. C-07-01200-PJH 

Case No. C-07-01207-PJH 

Case No. C-07-01212-PJH 

Case No. C-07-01381-PJH 

[PROPOSED] 

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 1 

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 53 Filed 06/25/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA2:833642.1 - 2 - 

[PROPOSED] PRE-TRIAL ORDER NO. 1

C 06-01665, C-06-02915, C-07-01200, 

C-07-01207, C-07-01212 & C-07-01381 

All-American Semiconductor, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor Inc., et al. 

Case No. C-07-01200-PJH 

DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust, by its Trustee 

Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Hynix Semiconductor 

Inc., et al. 

Case No. C-07-01381-PJH. 

On May 31, 2007, the Court held a joint Case Management Conference for 

each of the six cases listed herein. Plaintiffs Sun, Unisys, Edge, Jaco and All-American 

were represented by Crowell & Moring LLP and plaintiff DRAM Claims Liquidation 

Trust was represented by Lindquist & Vennum LLP and Sellar, Hazard, Manning, Ficenec 

& Lai. 

Defendants Hynix Semiconductor Inc. and Hynix Semiconductor Inc. were 

represented by O’Melveny & Myers LLP with respect to the Sun, Unisys, Edge, Jaco and 

All-American actions; defendants Mosel Vitelic Inc. and Mosel Vitelic Corporation were 

represented by Heller Ehrman LLP; defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and 

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. were represented by Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton 

LLP; defendants Infineon Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies North America 

Corporation were represented by Kaye Scholer LLP; defendants Nanya Technology 

Corporation and Nanya Technology Corporation USA were represented by Orrick 

Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP; defendants Winbond Electronics Corporation and Winbond 

Electronics Corporation America were represented by Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, 

Garrett & Dunner LLP; defendants Elpida Memory, Inc. and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. 

were represented by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP; defendant NEC Electronics 

America, Inc. was represented by Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP; 

defendants Mitsubishi Electric Corp.. Mitsubishi Electric and Electronics USA, Inc., and 

Mitsubishi Electric Europe B.V. were represented by Jenner & Block LLP and Krieg, 

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 53 Filed 06/25/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA2:833642.1 - 3 - 

[PROPOSED] PRE-TRIAL ORDER NO. 1

C 06-01665, C-06-02915, C-07-01200, 

C-07-01207, C-07-01212 & C-07-01381 

Keller, Sloan, Reilley & Roman, LLP; and defendants Micron Technology, Inc, and 

Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. were represented by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP. 

1. The Court adopts the following pre-trial schedule for these cases. 

Unless otherwise stated, each date below applies to every action listed above. 

EVENT COORDINATED 

SCHEDULE 

Exchange Initial Disclosures in 

Jaco, Edge All-American and 

DRAM Liquidation Trust actions; 

MDL Defendants will produce 

MDL materials 

6/14/07 

Group mediation with Unisys 6/20/07 

Group mediation with Sun 6/21/07 

Follow-up mediations in 

Sun/Unisys actions 

7/19/07 – 7/20/07 

Fact discovery closes in all cases 11/16/07 

Deadline for mediation in Edge, 

Jaco, All-American and DRAM 

Liquidation Trust 

11/30/07 

Deadline for Plaintiffs’ expert 

reports 

12/14/07 

Depositions of Plaintiffs’ experts 12/15/07-1/24/08 

Deadline for Defendants’ expert 

reports 

1/25/08 

Depositions of Defendants’ 

experts 

1/26/08-2/21/08 

Deadline for Plaintiffs’ expert 

rebuttal reports 

2/22/08 

Depositions of Plaintiffs’ rebuttal 

experts 

2/23/08-3/13/08 

Deadline for dispositive motions 3/14/08 

Deadline for Oppositions to 

dispositive motions 

4/11/08 

Deadline for Reply briefs in 

support of dispositive motions 

4/30/08 

Hearing held on dispositive 

motions 

5/28/08 

Pre-Trial Conference 9/11/08 

Cases ready for trial; court to 

determine which case goes first 

10/20/08 

2. Any discovery disputes are referred to Magistrate Judge Spero for 

resolution. 

3. Defendants are entitled to commence depositions of plaintiffs’ 

experts when they file reports. If an expert submits both an expert report and a rebuttal 

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 53 Filed 06/25/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA2:833642.1 - 4 - 

[PROPOSED] PRE-TRIAL ORDER NO. 1

C 06-01665, C-06-02915, C-07-01200, 

C-07-01207, C-07-01212 & C-07-01381 

report, defendants are permitted to take a second deposition of that expert. A second 

deposition of an expert for plaintiffs following submission of a rebuttal report shall be 

limited to one-half day. 

4. On June 4, 2007 defendants filed Motions to Dismiss in the 

Sun/Unisys consolidated action and in the DRAM Liquidation Trust. Pursuant to the 

Court’s request, the parties have agreed to a briefing and hearing schedule for those 

motions to dismiss as follows: 

EVENT SCHEDULE 

Defendants’ motions to dismiss 

filed 

6/04/2007 

Plaintiffs’ opposition briefs filed 7/16/2007 

Defendants’ reply briefs filed 8/13/07 

Hearing on each motion 9/12//07 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California 

6/25/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 53 Filed 06/25/07 Page 4 of 4