Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-02150/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-02150-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

Case No.: 5:16-cv-02150-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

NADINE ADKINS,

Plaintiff,

v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:16-cv-02150-EJD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE 

RESOLUTION

On August 15, 2016, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff and all defendants who 

have appeared in this action but have not filed a Notice of Settlement to meet and confer in order 

to reach an agreement on an ADR process and file, within 10 days, either (1) a stipulation 

embodying their agreement, or (2) the form entitled “Notice of Need of ADR Phone Conference.” 

Dkt. No. 46. At the time the order issued, Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc.,

Seventh Avenue, Inc., and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc. had appeared in this action but 

had not filed Notices of Settlement. As of the date and time this was order was filed, neither these 

defendants nor Plaintiff have complied and the time for compliance has expired.

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to appear before the Honorable Edward J. Davila on 

September 15, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 1, 5th Floor, United States District Court, 

280 S. First Street, San Jose, California, 95113, to show cause why the court should not impose 

any and all appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal of this action, on the 

parties, or any of them, for willful disobedience of a court order.

The parties may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions 

should not be imposed on or before September 8, 2016. In doing so, however, they must (1) 

Case 5:16-cv-02150-EJD Document 50 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:16-cv-02150-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

explain their failure to comply with the original deadline to file one of the ADR forms, and (2) 

must also file one of the forms contemplated by the August 15th Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 31, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:16-cv-02150-EJD Document 50 Filed 08/31/16 Page 2 of 2