Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_96-cv-01486/USCOURTS-cand-3_96-cv-01486-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip and Order on Pretrial Deadlines

Clark v. California, C 96-1486 CRB 1

PRISON LAW OFFICE

DONALD SPECTER – 83925

SARA NORMAN – 189536

SUSAN CHRISTIAN – 121210

PENNY GODBOLD – 226925

ZOE SCHONFELD - 243755

General Delivery

San Quentin, California 94964

Telephone: (510) 280-2621

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DERRICK CLARK, et al., )

 )

Plaintiffs, )

 )

 )

v. )

 )

 )

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

 )

__________________________________)

Case No. C 96-1486 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL

DEADLINES

Action filed: April 22, 1996

At the Case Management Conference of January 12, 2010, the Court directed the

parties to work out prehearing deadlines in this matter. Civil Minute Order, January 12,

2010 (Docket #297). Accordingly, the parties have stipulated to the following adjusted

deadlines.

The Court’s Guidelines for Trial and Final Pretrial Conference in Civil Bench

Cases requires that motions in limine be served 20 days before the final pretrial

conference. Since the final pretrial conference in this case is set for April 2, 2010, any

motions in limine must be served by March 15, 2010. Oppositions to motions in limine

Case 3:96-cv-01486-CRB Document 357 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip and Order on Pretrial Deadlines

Clark v. California, C 96-1486 CRB 2

must be served 10 days before the final pretrial conference, or by March 23, 2010. The

parties hereby stipulate to modify these dates, and serve motions in limine on March 19

and oppositions to motions in limine on March 26. The moving party will file the

collated motions/oppositions on March 26. 

The parties further stipulate that proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law

will not be included in the joint proposed final pretrial order, to be filed March 26, but

will instead be filed following the hearing, at a date to be set by the Court. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: March 12, 2010 PRISON LAW OFFICE

By: /s/ 

Sara Norman

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: March 12, 2010 EDMUND G. BROWN JR.

Attorney General of California

JONATHAN L. WOLFF

Senior Assistant Attorney General

DANIELLE F. O'BANNON

Deputy Attorney General

JULIANNE MOSSLER

Deputy Attorney General

By: /s/ 

JOSE A. ZELIDON-ZEPEDA

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants State of California, et al.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March ___, 2010 _____________________________ 

 The Honorable Charles Breyer

United States District Court Judge 

23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:96-cv-01486-CRB Document 357 Filed 03/23/10 Page 2 of 2