Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00962/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00962-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E.E.O.C.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

LEXUS OF SERRAMONTE,

 Defendants.

_____________________________/

No. C 05-0962 SBA (WDB)

ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE UNTIL RESOLUTION

OF DISCOVERY DISPUTE

The court has reviewed the parties' confidential settlement conference statements

and ORDERS as follows.

It is the court's view that the parties cannot effectively discuss settlement until the

District Court resolves the discovery dispute relating to the unidentified class of women

allegedly harassed at Lexus of Serramonte. The court, therefore, CONTINUES the

settlement conference scheduled for Monday, August 28, 2006, at 2:00 p.m. to

Thursday, September 14, 2006 at 2:00 p.m.

The court is aware that the parties have been ordered by Judge Armstrong to

participate in a mandatory settlement conference before September 2, 2006. Because the

District Judge is unavailable at this time, this court authorizes a brief of extension of that

deadline to accommodate the parties' need to resolve this dispute.

//

//

//

Case 4:05-cv-00962-SBA Document 59 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The parties must notify the undersigned's chambers immediately upon receiving

a schedule for resolution of this matter from the District Court. The court will reschedule

the September 14th settlement conference if necessary to accommodate Judge

Armstrong's schedule.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2006

/s/ Wayne D. Brazil 

WAYNE D. BRAZIL

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: parties, 

SBA, WDB

Case 4:05-cv-00962-SBA Document 59 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 2