Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02915/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02915-46/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC.,

Plaintiff, No. C 06-1665 PJH

v. ORDER SETTING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

This Document Also Relates to:

Unisys Corp. v. Hynix et al., C 06-2915 PJH

All American Semiconductor v. Hynix et al., C 07-1200 PJH

Edge Electronics v. Hynix et al., C 07-1207 PJH

Jaco Electronics v. Hynix et al., C 07-1212 PJH

DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust v. Hynix et al., C 07-1381 PJH

_______________________________/

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Civil L. R. 16-

10, a Case Management Conference will be held in these cases on January 28, 2010, at

1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland,

California. The purpose of the case management conference is to confer with the parties

regarding the status of the pending litigation, including any ongoing settlement

proceedings, and to set a hearing scheduling in connection with all pending matters in the

above-referenced actions. 

In advance of the case management conference, the court has reviewed the

underlying dockets. Based on the information contained therein, a summary of the

dismissals thus far entered in each case, and the named defendants currently active in

each, is as follows: 

Case 4:06-cv-02915-PJH Document 398 Filed 01/11/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Sun Microsystems v. Hynix:

Action terminated July 14, 2009.

Honeywell Int’l v. Hynix:

Action terminated September 12, 2007.

Unisys v. Hynix:

Dismissals have been filed by: Mitsubishi (11/21/07); Winbond (1/17/08); Mosel

(1/18/08); Nanya (7/17/09); and Infineon (12/8/09). The docket furthermore indicates that

Elpida was terminated from the action on February 27, 2008, and that Hynix is the only

entity defendant who remains pending. It also appears to the court, however, that Elpida’s

termination on the docket is mistaken and that it, too, actually remains as a pending entity

defendant, since neither the docket nor the court’s own record-keeping indicates that any

entry of dismissal as to Elpida has been filed. Counsel are thus ordered to clarify this

discrepancy to the court, as instructed below. 

All American Semiconductor v. Hynix:

Dismissals have been filed by: Mitsubishi (11/16/07); Winbond (5/28/08); Mosel

(5/28/08); Elpida (4/30/09); and Infineon (12/10/09). The entity defendants which remain

pending are: Hynix; Nanya; Micron; and NEC. 

Edge Electronics v. Hynix:

Dismissals have been filed by: Mitsubishi (11/16/07); Winbond (1/17/08); Mosel

(1/18/08); Samsung (12/11/08); Elpida (3/24/09); Nanya (8/4/09); Hynix (8/11/09); and

Infineon (1/6/10). There appear to be no remaining entity defendants, and case termination

appears warranted. 

Jaco Electronics v. Hynix:

Dismissals have been filed by: Mitsubishi (11/13/07); Winbond (1/17/08); Mosel

(1/18/08); Elpida (3/24/09); Nanya (8/4/09); Hynix (8/11/09); and Infineon (1/5/10). The

entity defendants which remain pending are: Micron; and NEC. 

Case 4:06-cv-02915-PJH Document 398 Filed 01/11/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust v. Hynix:

Dismissals have been filed by: Mitsubishi (11/16/07); Winbond (1/17/08); Hitachi

(1/17/08); Mosel (4/9/08); Samsung (8/18/08); Elpida (3/24/09); Nanya (7/17/09); Hynix

(7/24/09); NEC (11/27/07 and 5/13/08); and Infineon (12/4/09). The entity defendants

which remain pending are: Micron; and Crucial. 

The parties are instructed to compare the foregoing summary of dismissals with their

own files, and to cross-check for accuracy. Any discrepancy shall be brought to the court’s

attention at the case management conference, and in a joint case management statement

to be submitted by counsel. Counsel are instructed to meet and confer prior to the filing of

same, and to file their case management statement with the court not less than seven (7)

days before the conference.

Only those parties with matters currently pending need appear at the conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2010 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-02915-PJH Document 398 Filed 01/11/10 Page 3 of 3