Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03179/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03179-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Stipulated Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Third Claim and Striking Of Portions of Third Amended

Complaint, and [Proposed] Order Regarding Same/Case No. CV-09-03179 SI

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Andrew M. Paley (SBN 149699) apaley@seyfarth.com

Sheryl L. Skibbe (SBN 199441) sskibbe@seyfarth.com

2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500

Los Angeles, California 90067

Telephone: (310) 277-7200

Facsimile: (310) 201-5219

Andrew M. McNaught (SBN 209093) amcnaught@seyfarth.com

Ashley E. Choren (SBN 260337) achoren@seyfarth.com

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 397-2823

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549

Attorneys for Defendants

H&R Block Enterprises LLC (fka H&R Block Enterprises, Inc.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARABELLA LEMUS, an individual and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

H&R BLOCK TAX AND BUSINESS

SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation;

H&R BLOCK ENTERPRISES, INC., a

Missouri corporation; H&R BLOCK TAX

SERVICES, INC., a Missouri corporation;

H&R BLOCK SERVICES, INC., a Missouri

corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV-09-03179 SI

The Honorable Susan Illston

STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF

PLAINTIFF’S THIRD CLAIM AND

STRIKING OF PORTIONS OF THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT;

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING

SAME

Complaint Filed: June 9, 2009

FAC Filed: July 8, 2009

SAC Filed: October 8, 2009

TAC Filed: June 3, 2010

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES that Plaintiffs’ Third Claim for

violations of Labor Code section 2802 is dismissed without prejudice, and that paragraph 2(f),

paragraph 22, and paragraph 59, line 17, of Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint are stricken,

also without prejudice.

Case 3:09-cv-03179-SI Document 44 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulated Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Third Claim and Striking Of Portions of Third Amended

Complaint, and [Proposed] Order Regarding Same/Case No. CV-09-03179 SI

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO STIPULATE AND

RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE COURT ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, Plaintiffs’ Third Claim is hereby DISMISSED

without prejudice. Further, paragraph 22, and paragraph 59, line 17, of Plaintiff’s Third

Amended Complaint are STRICKEN without prejudice.

DATED: August 4, 2010

By:

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

/s/ Andrew M. McNaught

Andrew M. McNaught

Attorneys for Defendant

H&R BLOCK ENTERPRISES LLC

DATED: August 4, 2010

By:

MARLIN & SALTZMAN

/s/ Louis Marlin

Louis Marlin

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ARABELLA LEMUS

MALVIN A. AYALA

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________

HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

12494144v.1

Case 3:09-cv-03179-SI Document 44 Filed 08/05/10 Page 2 of 2