Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02133/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02133-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT THOMAS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2133 LKK DAD P

vs.

SCOTT McKEE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed April 25, 2008, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis was denied and plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a properly completed in forma

pauperis application for a non-prisoner. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result

in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed a properly completed in forma

pauperis application. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Case 2:07-cv-02133-LKK -DAD Document 21 Filed 06/12/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 12, 2008.

DAD:lg

thom2133.fifp(2)

Case 2:07-cv-02133-LKK -DAD Document 21 Filed 06/12/08 Page 2 of 2