Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01806/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01806-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME 

WITHIN WHICH TO ANSWER PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1 

JAMES C. YOON (State Bar No. 177155) 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: 650-493-9300 

Facsimile: 650-493-6811 

jyoon@wgsr.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BARRACUDA NETWORKS, INC.

JIMMY SHIN (State Bar No. 200161) 

McDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY LLP 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: 650-813-5000 

Facsimile: 650-813-5100 

jshin@mwe.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TREND MICRO INCORPORATED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

BARRACUDA NETWORKS, INC., 

a Delaware corporation 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, 

a California corporation 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO.: C07-01806-MHP

 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME WITHIN 

WHICH TO ANSWER PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1 

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Barracuda Networks, Inc. 

(“BARRACUDA”) and Defendant Trend Micro Incorporated (“TREND MICRO”), by and 

through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time in which TREND MICRO 

may answer, plead, or otherwise respond to the complaint of BARRACUDA until Monday, 

May 21, 2007. 

// 

// 

// 

Case 3:07-cv-01806-MHP Document 15 Filed 04/24/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME 

WITHIN WHICH TO ANSWER PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1

-2- 

This joint stipulated request is made for good cause and not for purposes of delay. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 18, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI McDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY LLP 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ James C. Yoon 

JAMES C. YOON (State Bar No. 177155) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BARRACUDA NETWORKS, INC.

By: /s/ Jimmy Shin 

JIMMY SHIN (State Bar No. 200161) 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TREND MICRO INCORPORATED 

Case 3:07-cv-01806-MHP Document 15 Filed 04/24/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME 

WITHIN WHICH TO ANSWER PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1

-3- 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________________________ 

 United States District/Magistrate Judge 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(b) regarding signatures, 

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained 

from Jimmy Shin. 

Dated: April 18, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

 Professional Corporation 

 By: /s/ James C. Yoon 

4/23/2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:07-cv-01806-MHP Document 15 Filed 04/24/07 Page 3 of 3