Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05634/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05634-56/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

CASE NO. 3:07-cv-05634 CRB-DMR 

Joseph W. Cotchett (36324) 

Steven N. Williams (175489) 

Adam J. Zapala (245748) 

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 

San Francisco Airport Office Center 

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 

Burlingame, CA 94010 

Telephone: 650-697-6000 

Facsimile: 650-697-0577 

jcotchett@cpmlegal.com 

swilliams@cpmlegal.com 

azapala@cpmlegal.com 

Michael D. Hausfeld

HAUSFELD LLP

1700 k Street, N.W., Suite 650 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Tel: (202) 540-7200 

Fax: (202) 540-7201 

mhausfeld@hausfeldllp.com 

Michael P. Lehmann (77152) 

Christopher L. Lebsock (184546) 

HAUSFELD LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400 

San Francisco CA 94104 

Tel: (415) 633-1908 

Fax: (415) 358-4980 

mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com 

clebsock@hausfeldllp.com 

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER 

AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION 

Civil Case No. 3:07-cv-05634-CRB-DMR

MDL No. 1913 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE DEPOSITION LIMITS 

 

Judge: Hon. Donna M. Ryu 

Date: February 14, 2013 

Time: 11:00 a.m.

This Document Relates to: 

All Actions 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 691 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE INTERIM DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

CASE NO. 3:07-cv-05634 CRB-DMR 1 

 WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred concerning limits on the number of 

depositions to be taken in this case and have agreed as follows: 

1. Plaintiffs and Defendants may take a total of 90 depositions per side. 

2. No more than 10 (including 30(b)(6)) depositions may be conducted by one side of 

deponents related to a single party on the opposing side, except that this limitation shall not apply 

to any party which has pled guilty to violating the Sherman Act in relation to the provision of 

Transpacific passenger air transportation or to former employees of a single party who are not 

represented by counsel for the party. The limit on depositions related to a single party which has 

pled guilty to violating the Sherman Act in relation to the provision of Transpacific passenger air 

transportation shall be 15. 

3. Rule 30(a)(2)(A)(ii) and the seven hour presumptive limit of Rule 30(d)(1) shall 

apply to all depositions, except that depositions for which interpreters are used shall have a nine 

hour presumptive limit. 

4. The foregoing limitation of 90 depositions per side shall not include any 

depositions of expert witnesses. 

5. Any limitations set forth above may be modified by agreement of the parties or 

upon a showing of good cause to the Court after appropriate efforts to resolve disputes between 

the parties have been made. 

Dated: February 13, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Steven N. Williams 

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP

Joeseph W. Cotchett 

Steven N. Williams 

Adam J. Zapala 

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 691 Filed 02/14/13 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE INTERIM DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

CASE NO. 3:07-cv-05634 CRB-DMR 2 

By: /s/ Michael P. Lehmann

HAUSFELD, LLP

Michael D. Hausfeld 

Michael P. Lehmann 

Christopher Lebsock 

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

By: /s/ Michael J. Holland 

CONDON & FORSYTH LLP 

Michael J. Holland 

Counsel for Defendant Air New Zealand 

By: /s/ Jesse W. Markham 

JESSE W. MARKHAM, JR.

Counsel for Defendant All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd.

By: /s/ Ankur Kapoor

CONSTANTINE CANNON LLP 

Douglas E. Rosenthal 

Ankur Kapoor 

Gary J. Malone 

Alysia Solow 

Counsel for Defendant All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd.

By: /s/ David H. Bamberger

DLA PIPER LLP

David H. Bamberger 

Deana L. Cairo 

Counsel for Defendant Cathay Pacific Airways

By: /s/ James V. Dick 

SQUIRE SANDERS (US) LLP

James V. Dick 

Counsel for Defendant China Airlines 

By: /s/ Richard S. Snyder

FRESHFIELDS BRUCKHAUS 

DERINGER US LLP 

Richard S. Snyder (pro hac vice) 

 

Counsel for Defendant Continental Airlines, Inc.

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 691 Filed 02/14/13 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE INTERIM DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

CASE NO. 3:07-cv-05634 CRB-DMR 3 

By: /s/ Tammy Tsoumas 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Tammy Tsoumas 

Counsel for Defendant EVA Airways 

By: /s/ Shahzeb Lari

FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER & 

JACOBSON LLP 

Bernard A. Nigro 

Shahzeb Lari 

Counsel for Defendant Malaysia Airline System 

Berhad

By: /s/ W. Todd Miller

BAKER & MILLER PLLC 

W. Todd Miller (pro hac vice) 

Kimberly N. Shaw (pro hac vice) 

 

Counsel for Defendant Qantas Airways Limited

By: /s/ William R. Sherman 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

William R. Sherman 

Ashley M. Bauer 

 

Counsel for Defendant Singapore Airlines Limited

By: /s/ Anita Stork 

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

Anita Stork 

Cousnel for Defendant Philippine Airlines

By: /s/ Rowan D. Wilson 

CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP

Rowan D. Wilson 

Kavita Ramakrishnan 

Counsel for Defendant Thai Airways International 

Public Co., Ltd.

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 691 Filed 02/14/13 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE INTERIM DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

CASE NO. 3:07-cv-05634 CRB-DMR 4 

By: /s/ Robert B. Hawk 

HOGAN LOVELL US LLP 

Robert B. Hawk 

Counsel for Defendant Vietnam Air Lines

ATTESTATION OF FILING

 I, Steven N. Williams, hereby attest, pursuant to Northern District of California, Local 

Rule 5-1(i)(3), that concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each 

signatory hereto. 

 /s/ Steven N. Williams 

 Steven N. Williams 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 14, 2013 

 Donna M. Ryu 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 691 Filed 02/14/13 Page 5 of 5