Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-03255/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-03255-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

I

2

3

5

6

7

8

9

1 0

i l

1 2

l 3

1 4

t )

l 6

l 7

l 8

l 9

20

2 1

22

z )

. A

25

26

27

28

29

Michael Allen

Stephen M. Dane

John P. Relman

Thomas J. Kearv

Pendine admission oro hac vice

D. Scotl Chang, # 1'46403

Relman & Dane, PLLC

1225 l9'n Street, NW, Suite 600

Washington, DC 20036

Telephone: (202) 7 28-1888

Fax: (202) 728-0848

Auorneys for Plaintffi

Maxwell M. Freeman #31278

Lee Roy Pierce, Jr. #119318

Michael L. Gurev #163268

Thomas H. Keelins #114979

Freeman, D' AiutoiPierce

Gurev, Keeling & Wolf, PLC

1818 Grand Canal Boulevard. Suite 4

Stockton, California 95207

Telephone (209) 47 4-1818

Fax: (209) 474-1245

Anorneys for Defendants A.G. Spanos Construction, Inc.,

A. Q. Spgios Dei,elopment, Inc.,' A. G. Spanos Land Company, Inc.,

and A.G. Spanos Management, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

National Fair Housing Alliance, Inc., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

V.

A.G. Spanos Construction, Inc.; et a1..,

Defendants.

Case No. C07-3255 - SBA

STTPULATTON AND IPROPOSEDI

ORDER INCREASING PAGE LIMITS

FOR CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION

BRIEF TO SPANOS DEFENDANTS'

MOTTONS (1) TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED

COMPLATNT, (2) FOR MORE

DEF'INITE STATEMENT RE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLATNT, (3) TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO JOIN

NECESSARY AND INDISPENSABLE

PARTTES, AND (4) TO STRIKE

VARIOUS CLAIMS FOR RBLIEF

SOUGHT IN PLANTIFFS' FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

AND FOR CONSOLIDATED REPLY

BRIEF

I

STIPUTL^A,TION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER INCREASING PAGE

LIMITS FOR CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION BRIEF AND FOR

CONSOLIDATED REPLY BRIEF; CASE NO. C-07-3255-SBA

Case 4:07-cv-03255-SBA Document 72 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 1 of 4 Case 4:07-cv-03255-SBA Document 73 Filed 02/15/08 Page 1 of 5
I

2

6

7

8

9

l 0

l l

t 2

I J

t 4

l 5

l 6

1 7

l 8

l 9

20

2 l

22

zt

24

25

26

27

28

29

SUBJECT TO COURT APPROVAL, Plaintiffs and Defendants A.G. Spanos

Construction, Inc.; A.G. Spanos Development, Inc.; A.G. Spanos Land Company, Inc.; A.G.

Spanos Management,Inc., and The Spanos Corporation (collectively "the Spanos

Defendants), through their attorneys of record, (collectively, "the Parties") HEREBY

STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on December 21, 20A7, the Spanos Defendants filed motions (l) to

Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint or, Alternatively, for Partial Dismissal of

Plaintiffs' First Amended Compl unt; (2) for More Definite Statement Re First Amended

Complaint; (3) to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint for Failure to Join Necessary

and/or Indispensable Parties; and (a) to Strike Various Claims for Relief Sought in Plaintiffs'

First Amended Complaint.

WHEREAS, four separate briefs in opposition to these motions and four separate

reply briefs in support of these motions would likely generate overlapping and duplicative

arguments.

WHEREAS, the Parties can consolidate their arguments as to all four motions within

a single opposition or reply brief, although not within the page limits set forth in Local Rule

7-3(c).

Based upon the foregoing, the Parties hereto STIPULATE that, pursuant to this

Honorable Court's approval, a single consolidated brief opposing all four motions filed on

December 21,2007 shall not exceed 60 pages and a single consolidated reply brief shall not

exceed 40 pages. Both are increases to the page limits for opposition and reply briefs set

forth in Local Rule 7-3(c).

2

STIPUTLATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER INCREASING PAGE

LIMITS FOR CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION BRIEF AND FOR

CONSOLIDATED REPLY BRIEF: CASE NO. C-07-3255-SBA

Case 4:07-cv-03255-SBA Document 72 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 2 of 4 Case 4:07-cv-03255-SBA Document 73 Filed 02/15/08 Page 2 of 5
Respectfu lly Submitted,

Michael Allen

Stephen M. Dane

John P. Relman

Thomas J. Kearv

Pendine admission pro hac vice

D. Scot-t Chang, Bai No. 146403

Relman & Dane. PLLC

1225 l9tn Street, NW, Suite 600

Washington DC 20036

Telephone: (202) 728-l 888

Fax: (202\ 728-0848

Attorneys for Plaintffi

Dated: February /3,ZOOA

Maxwell M. Freeman #31278

Lee Roy Pierce, Jr. #l19318

Michael L. Gurev #163268

Thomas H. Keeling #114979

Freeman, D'Aiuto, Pierce

Gurev, Keeling & Wolf, PLC

l8l8 Grand Canal Boulevard, Suite 4

Stockton, California 9 5207

Telephone (209) 474-l 8 I 8

Fax: (209) 4'14-1245

Attornevs for Defendants A.G. Spanos

C o ns tri cii on, I ic., A. G. Sp ano s' D eve lo pm ent,

Inc., A.G. Spanos Land Compa4y,1n9., A.G.

Spanos Management, Inc., and The Spanos

Cornoration

Dated: February /3,2008

3

STIPUTLATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER INCREASING PACE

LIMITS FOR CONSOLTDATED OPPOSITION BRIEF AND FOR

CONSOLTDATED REPLY BRIEF: CASE NO. C'07'3255-SBA

Case 4:07-cv-03255-SBA Document 72 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 3 of 4 Case 4:07-cv-03255-SBA Document 73 Filed 02/15/08 Page 3 of 5
I

2

A

5

6

,1

8

9

1 0

l l

t 2

l 3

l4

l 5

t 6

t 7

l 8

l 9

20

2 l

22

23

24

25

26

L T

28

29

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

I hereby certiff that on February 13, 2008, a copy of the foregoing Stipulation

and [Proposed] Order Increasing Page Limits for Consolidated Opposition Brief and

Reply Brief was served upon the following by electronic mail:

Maxwell M. Freeman

Lee Roy Pierce, Jr

Michael L. Gurev

Thomas H. Keeling

Freeman, D'Aiuto, Pierce, Gurev,

Keeling & Woll PLC

1818 Grand Canal Boulevard, Suite 4

Stockton. California 9 5207

209/474-1818

Fax: 4151972-6301

Email : tkeeling@freemanfirm.com

5

STIPUTLATION AND IPROPOSED] ORDER INCREASING PAGE

LIMITS FOR CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION BRIEF AND FOR

CONSOLIDATED REPLY BRIEF: CASE NO. C-07-3255-SBA

Case 4:07-cv-03255-SBA Document 72 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 4 of 4 Case 4:07-cv-03255-SBA Document 73 Filed 02/15/08 Page 4 of 5
I

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1 0

1 1

t 2

I J

1 4

l 5

l 6

1 7

1 8

l 9

20

2 l

a A

25

26

27

28

29

follows:

1 .

Dated:

IPROPOSEDI ORDER

Having considered the foregoing Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as

A consolidated brief opposing the Spanos Defendants' motions filed on Dece

21,2007-(1) to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, (2) for More

Definite Statement Re: First Amended Complaint, (3) to Dismiss for Failure to

Join Necessary and Indispensable Parties, and (4) to Strike Various Claims for

Relief Sought in Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint-shall not exceed 60

2. A consolidated reply brief in support of these motions shall not exceed 40 pages.

Hon. Saundra B. Armstrone

4

STIPUTLATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER INCREASING PAGE

LIMITS FOR CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION BRIEF AND FOR

CONSOLIDATED REPLY BRIEF: CASE NO. C-07-3255-SBA

Case 4:07-cv-03255-SBA Document 72-2 Filed 02/13/2008 Page 1 of 1

XXXXXXXXX 2/14/08

Case 4:07-cv-03255-SBA Document 73 Filed 02/15/08 Page 5 of 5