Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-01661/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-01661-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (DKT. NO. 90); ORDER - CASE NO. 4:17-CV-01661-HSG 

ARTHUR A. HARTINGER (SBN 121521) 

ahartinger@publiclawgroup.com 

LINDA M. ROSS (SBN 133874) 

lross@publiclawgroup.com 

SPENCER J. WILSON (SBN 266938) 

swilson@publiMclawgroup.com 

RYAN McGINLEY-STEMPEL (SBN 296182) 

rmcginleystempel@publiclawgroup.com 

RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP® 

350 Sansome Street, Suite 300 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 848-7200 

Facsimile: (415) 848-7230 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF SANTA ROSA 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TIMOTHY ABOUDARA, JR. et al. 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 4:17-cv-01661-HSG 

JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING 

EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

(Dkt. No. 90); ORDER 

Action filed: March 27, 2017 

Trial date: September 10, 2018 

 

Case 4:17-cv-01661-HSG Document 94 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (DKT. NO. 90); ORDER - CASE NO. 4:17-CV-01661-HSG 

WHEREAS on June 14, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending 

Administrative Rulemaking (the “Motion to Stay,” Dkt. 87); 

WHEREAS the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Stay is set for September 13, 2018, at 

2:00 p.m.; 

WHEREAS on June 14, 2018, Defendant filed an Administrative Motion to Expedite the Hearing 

on the Stay Motion (the “Administrative Motion to Expedite Hearing,” Dkt. 88) so that it may be heard 

concurrently with Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 67), which is already set to be heard 

on July 19, 2018, at 2:00 p.m.; 

WHEREAS on June 15, 2018, the Court directed the Plaintiffs to file either an opposition or a 

statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s Administrative Motion to Expedite Hearing and directed the 

parties to meet and confer and to submit a proposed expedited briefing schedule on Defendant’s Motion 

to Stay (Dkt. 90); 

WHEREAS on June 18, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant’s 

Administrative Motion to Expedite (Dkt. 92); 

WHEREAS the parties met and conferred in accordance with the Court’s order and have reached 

a proposed expedited briefing schedule that accommodates defense counsel’s pre-planned vacations; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their counsel of record, 

subject to the approval of the Court, that 

1. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Stay on or before 

July 3, 2018. 

2. Defendant shall file any reply in support of its Motion to Stay on or before July 12, 

2018. 

The parties do not seek to modify any other deadlines in the scheduling order at this time. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 

Case 4:17-cv-01661-HSG Document 94 Filed 06/19/18 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (DKT. NO. 90); ORDER - CASE NO. 4:17-CV-01661-HSG 

Dated: June 18, 2018 RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP®

By: /s/ Arthur A. Hartinger 

 Arthur A. Hartinger 

Dated: June 18, 2018 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF SANTA ROSA 

MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT, A.P.C. 

By: /s/ Ian B. Sangster 

 Ian B. Sangster 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

TIMOTHY ABOUDARA, JR. et al. 

 

Case 4:17-cv-01661-HSG Document 94 Filed 06/19/18 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (DKT. NO. 90); ORDER - CASE NO. 4:17-CV-01661-HSG 

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1 

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document 

has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 

Dated: June 18, 2018 /s/ Arthur A. Hartinger 

Arthur A. Hartinger 

Case 4:17-cv-01661-HSG Document 94 Filed 06/19/18 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

JOINT SU

01661-HSG

P

P

Dated: Ju

UBMISSION R

G

ursuant to th

1. Defen

Proce

2. The h

Rulem

hereby

3. Plaint

2018. 

4. Defen

URSUANT 

une 19, 2018

REGARDING E

he foregoing

ndant’s Adm

edings Pend

earing on De

making (Dkt.

y reschedule

tiffs shall file

 

ndant shall fi

TO STIPUL

8 

EXPEDITED B

g stipulation 

ministrative M

ding Adminis

efendant’s M

. 87, the “Mo

ed for July 1

e their oppos

ile any reply

LATION, IT

-5-

BRIEFING SC

ORDER

and good ca

Motion to Ex

strative Rule

Motion to Sta

otion to Stay

9, 2018, at 2

sition to Def

y in support o

T IS SO ORD

CHEDULE (DK

R

ause appearin

xpedite the H

emaking (Dk

ay Proceedin

y”), currently

2:00 p.m. 

fendant’s Mo

of its Motion

DERED. 

Hon. Ha

U.S. DIS

KT. NO. 90); O

ng, it is here

Hearing on it

kt. 88), is gra

ngs Pending

y set for Sep

otion to Stay

n to Stay on 

aywood S. G

STRICT CO

ORDER - Case

eby ORDERE

ts Motion to 

anted. 

g Administra

ptember 13, 2

y on or befor

or before Ju

Gilliam, Jr. 

OURT JUDG

e No. 4:17-cvED that: 

Stay 

ative 

2018, is 

re July 3, 

uly 12, 2018.

GE

.

Case 4:17-cv-01661-HSG Document 94 Filed 06/19/18 Page 5 of 5