Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03297/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03297-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

Case No.: 5:14-CV-03297-LHK

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DANIELE GOZZI,

 Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA, et. al.,

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 5:14-CV-03297-LHK

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Plaintiff Danielle Gozzi (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant litigation alleging a claim under 28 

U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged improprieties in connection with the foreclosure of Plaintiff’s property. 

See ECF No. 1. Plaintiff asserted his claim against the following defendants: County of Monterey, 

State of California; Stephen I. Vagnini, County Recorder-County Clerk; Michael J. Miller, 

Auditor-Controller; Dean Flippo, District Attorney; Scott Miller, Sheriff-Coroner; Mary A. Zeeb, 

Treasurer-Tax Collector; Steve Mauck, Risk Management; Irv Grant, Deputy County Counsel; 

Fernando Armenta, County Supervisor; Louis Calcagno, County Supervisor; Simon Salinas, 

County Supervisor; Jane Parker, County Supervisor; Dave Potter, County Supervisor; Lew C. 

Bauman, County Administrator; and Gail T. Borkowski, Clerk of the Board (collectively, “County

Defendants”); Marla O. Anderson, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of 

Case 5:14-cv-03297-LHK Document 109 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:14-CV-03297-LHK

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

Monterey; Thomas W. Wills, Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Monterey; and 

Theresa A. Risi, Court Executive Officer for the Superior Court of California, County of Monterey 

(collectively, “Judicial Defendants”); and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; Bryan Cave, LLP; Sharon 

Weiss; Daniel T. Rockey; Goli Mahdavi; and Ethan Schatz (collectively, “Firm Defendants”). See 

id. 

On December 10, 2014, this Court granted three motions to dismiss brought by the Judicial 

Defendants, the Firm Defendants, and the County Defendants. ECF No. 104 (“Order”). The Court 

dismissed Plaintiff’s § 1983 claim against the Judicial Defendants with prejudice. See Order at 12.

The Court also dismissed Plaintiff’s § 1983 claim against the County Defendants and Firm 

Defendants, but granted Plaintiff leave to amend this claim and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended 

complaint within 30 days. Id. at 24. The Court cautioned that “[f]ailure to meet the thirty-day 

deadline to file an amended complaint . . . will result in a dismissal with prejudice.” Id.

It has been 35 days since the Court issued its Order, yet Plaintiff has not filed an amended 

complaint.1 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claim is DISMISSED with prejudice as to the Firm Defendants 

and the County Defendants. The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2015 ____________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

 

1

Since December 10, 2014, Plaintiff has filed four documents titled “Praecipe to Clerk of the 

Court.” See ECF Nos. 105, 106, 107 & 108. The most recent document was filed by Plaintiff on 

January 9, 2015. ECF No. 108. None of these documents are an amended complaint.

Case 5:14-cv-03297-LHK Document 109 Filed 01/14/15 Page 2 of 2