Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00843/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00843-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GLORIA P. MARTINEZ-SENFTNER 164048

THE MARTINEZ-SENFTNER LAW FIRM, P.C.

2999 Douglas Blvd.

Suite 205

Roseville, CA 95661

(916) 797-9907

Attorney for Plaintiffs

DARSHAN BADWAL and GURINDER BADWAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARSHAN BADWAL, et al.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HARJIT SINGH GILL, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:05CV-00843-WBS-JFM

District Judge William B. Shubb

Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF

ACTION AND ORDER THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1), by and between

Plaintiffs DARSNAN BADWAL and GURINDER BADWAL and all Defendants

who have appeared in this action, as follows:

1. This action was commenced on 4/28/05.

2. The action is not a class action; a receiver has

not been appointed; and the action is not governed by any

statute of the United States that requires an order of

Case 2:05-cv-00843-WBS -JFM Document 25 Filed 05/13/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the court for dismissal.

3. That this action be dismissed with prejudice

pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement

attached to the proposed stipulated Order and

incorporated by reference in that Order and made fully a

part of it.

Dated: 11/24/06 _/s/_________________________

GLORIA P. MARTINEZ-SENFTNER

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: 11/24/06 _/s/___________________________

AARON R. FELDMAN

Attorney for Defendants

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Stipulation set forth above, and

the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement attached

to this Order as Exhibit “1” and incorporated in this Order as

if fully set forth in it. Good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. This matter is dismissed with prejudice;

2. The dismissal is expressly conditioned on the terms and

conditions of the Settlement Agreement attached to and

incorporated in this Order;

3. The Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for the

purposes of taking any action needed to enforce the terms of

the attached Settlement Agreement, which is a part of this

Case 2:05-cv-00843-WBS -JFM Document 25 Filed 05/13/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order; and

4. Each party is to bear its own costs, as provided for in

the Settlement Agreement.

Dated: May 12, 2008

Case 2:05-cv-00843-WBS -JFM Document 25 Filed 05/13/08 Page 3 of 3