Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02254/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02254-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Jarek Molski, et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

 v.

Sycamore Creek Vineyards, et al.,

Defendant(s).

 /

NO. C 04-02254 JW 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

RE: SETTLEMENT

On July 1, 2005, the parties filed a joint notice of settlement informing the Court that the aboveentitled matter has reached a settlement. (See Docket No. 17.) The parties stated that “dismissal

documents will be filed with the Court no later than August 31, 2005.” Id. The Court has yet to receive

any dismissal documents and the parties are scheduled for a case management on September 26, 2005. In

light of the settlement, the Court vacates the September 26, 2005, case management conference and all trial

and pretrial dates to give the parties additional time to file dismissal documents. Thus, on or before

October 3, 2005, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(a). 

If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, all parties shall appear in Courtroom No. 8, 4th

Floor, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, Ca. on October 17, 2005 at 9:00

a.m. and to show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

On or before October 7, 2005, the parties shall file a joint statement in response to the Order to Show

Cause. The joint statement shall set forth the status of the activities of the parties for finalizing the settlement
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 2

and how much additional time is requested to finalize and file the dismissal. If a voluntary dismissal is filed

as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated.

Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss this

action.

Dated: September 15, 2005 /s/ James Ware 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Carol J. Marshall carol@marshallsuzuki.com

Kristina M. Wertz kwertz@disabilitieslaw.com

Thomas E. Frankovich tfrankovich@disabilitieslaw.com

Thuy Minh-Ha Hoang thoang@disabilitieslaw.com

Dated: September 15, 2005 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By:__/s/ JW Chambers_______________

Ronald L. Davis

Courtroom Deputy