Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00880/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00880-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

BRIAN W. ENOS

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Courthouse

2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401

Fresno, California 93721

Telephone: (559) 497-4000

Facsimile: (559) 497-4099

Attorneys for Defendant United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD L. PORTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary )

of the Department of the Navy,)

)

Defendant. )

 )

1:06-cv-00880-OWW-SMS

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING DATE

The Court is presently scheduled to hear defendant Donald C.

Winter’s (“Navy”) motion to dismiss on Monday, December 11, 2006. 

Plaintiff Ronald L. Porter (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Navy

stipulate and agree to continue this hearing until Monday,

February 26, 2007, and respectfully request the Court to endorse

this stipulation by way of formal order.

Good cause exists in support of this stipulation. Plaintiff

lives in Ridgecrest and cares full time for a person with special

needs. He is also in the midst of locating an attorney to

consult or assist him with this case. Plaintiff is unavailable

to attend the hearing presently scheduled to take place on

December 11, 2006, and seeks to continue the hearing until a date

Case 1:06-cv-00880-LJO-SMS Document 9 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE

after the holiday season. Counsel for the Navy has a five week

condemnation trial set to begin in Department 2 on January 17,

2007. He can accommodate a hearing date extended until after the

new year, but if so he will not be available to participate until

after the above trial.

Based on the above, the parties agree to continue this

matter’s hearing on the Navy’s motion to dismiss from December

11, 2006 until February 26, 2007. The parties therefore propose

the following new schedule, and request that the court endorse it

by way of formal order:

MATTER (prior deadline in parentheses) CONTINUED DATE

Hearing on Navy’s 

Motion to Dismiss (Dec. 11, 2006) February 26, 2007 

Respectfully submitted,

FOR PLAINTIFF:

Dated: November 14, 2006 RONALD L. PORTER

(As auth. 11/14/06)

_/s/ Ronald L. Porter

By: Ronald L. Porter, Pro Se

FOR DEFENDANT NAVY:

Dated: November 15, 2006 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

_/s/ Brian W. Enos________

By: BRIAN W. ENOS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 21, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00880-LJO-SMS Document 9 Filed 11/27/06 Page 2 of 2