Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01076/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01076-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAUL JOSEPH MALDONADO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

SCRIBNER, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-cv-01076-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 4)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 2, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a

Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DISMISSED, and the Clerk of Court be directed to enter judgment. 

These Findings and Recommendation were served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections were to be filed within

fifteen (15) days from the date of service of that order. On

August 20, 2007 and October 15, 2007, respectively, Petitioner

filed a motion to extend time. On September 14, 2007 and October

10, 2007, respectively, the court granted Petitioner an additional

thirty (30) days within which to respond. On November 26, 2007,

Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

Case 1:07-cv-01076-OWW -DLB Document 11 Filed 01/02/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendation are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed August 2, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01076-OWW -DLB Document 11 Filed 01/02/08 Page 2 of 2