Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00424/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00424-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

{00378832.DOC}Stipulation – Dismissal re Sac County/Sheriff’s Dept - 1 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jeffrey S. Kravitz (SBN 186209)

KRAVITZ LAW OFFICE 

2310 J Street Suite A 

Sacramento, CA 95816 

Ph: 916-553-4072 

Fax: 916-553-4074 

KravitzLaw@aol.com

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Terence J. Cassidy (SBN 099180) 

Keith E. Nourot (SBN 221122) 

PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT 

350 University Ave. Suite 200 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Ph: 916-929-1481 

Fax: 916-927-3706 

TCassidy@pswdlaw.com

Attorney for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO (also sued as SACRAMENTO 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT), SHERIFF LOU BLANAS and DEPUTY T. 

KOONTZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT RUSHING 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY et.al. 

 Defendants 

Case No.: CIV-S-04-0424 GEB GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT, 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY (also sued as 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT)

Complaint Filed: March 1, 2004 

Trial Date: October 25, 2005 

_______________________________________ 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff ROBERT 

RUSHING, Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO (also sued as SACRAMENTO 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT) by and through their undersigned counsel, that any and 

all claims against Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO (also sued as SACRAMENTO 

Case 2:04-cv-00424-GEB-GGH Document 17 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 2
{00378832.DOC}Stipulation – Dismissal re Sac County/Sheriff’s Dept - 2 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT) by and through their undersigned counsel, that the 

claims by Plaintiff alleged against this Defendant be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each party to bear their own attorney’s fees and 

costs. 

 KRAVITZ LAW OFFICE 

Dated: July 29, 2005 By: /s/ Jeff Kravitz 

 Jeffrey S. Kravitz 

 PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG AND DELEHANT 

 A Professional Corporation 

Dated: July 29, 2005 By: /s/ KEITH E. NOUROT 

 Terence J. Cassidy 

 Keith E. Nourot 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO (also sued as 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT), SHERIFF LOU BLANAS and 

DEPUTY T. KOONTZ 

* * * * * * * 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 2, 2005 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. 

 United States District Judge 

 

Case 2:04-cv-00424-GEB-GGH Document 17 Filed 08/02/05 Page 2 of 2