Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00184/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00184-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits

---

1

Case No.: 5:15-cv-00184-EJD

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER 

WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GEORGE E. ROLLINS,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEHROOZ ABDI, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:15-cv-00184-EJD 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO 

FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

CONSIDER WHETHER CASES 

SHOULD BE RELATED

Since Plaintiff has identified that the instant action is related to three other cases currently 

pending in this district, namely Karr v. Abdi, Case No. 5:15-cv-00200-NC; McMillan v. 

InvenSense, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-00084-JD; and Lendales v. InvenSense, Inc., Case No. 3:15-

cv-00142-VC; the court orders Plaintiff to file in Case No. 3:15-cv-00085-JD an administrative 

motion to consider whether this and the other three named cases should be related pursuant to

Civil Local Rule 3-12(b). The motion shall be filed on or before March 6, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2015

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00184-JD Document 15 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 1