Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01237/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01237-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Stacy Anderson, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Greg Fizer, et al. 

 Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV07-1237-PHX-SRB

ORDER

Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

on August June 25, 2007 claiming eight grounds for relief. Respondents filed their answer

to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on October 22, 2007. On November 13,

2007 Petitioner filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss grounds one, two, three, six and seven

with prejudice. The Court granted Petitioner’s motion on December 4, 2007. Grounds four,

five and eight were the only remaining grounds for relief. On August 18, 2008, the

Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be

denied and dismissed with prejudice.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. 

Case 2:07-cv-01237-SRB Document 31 Filed 09/30/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

On August 29, 2008 Petitioner filed a Motion for Certificate of Appealability and a

Certificate of Notice for Appealability From 9th Circuit. On September 10, 2008, the Court

denied Petitioner’s Motion for Certificate of Appealability and a Certificate of Notice for

Appealability From 9th Circuit as premature and gave Petitioner an additional 10 days to file

his objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The time to file such

objections has since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been

filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 29th day of September, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-01237-SRB Document 31 Filed 09/30/08 Page 2 of 2