Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00949/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00949-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MORRIS DAY aka

RICKEY L. ALFORD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0949 GEB DAD P

vs.

J. WATERS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed May 25, 2005, plaintiff was ordered to pay the appropriate filing

fee within twenty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed. The order was re-served on plaintiff at his last known address on 

June 17, 2005. The time period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s

order and has not paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

Case 2:05-cv-00949-GEB-DAD Document 6 Filed 07/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 20, 2005.

DAD:lg

day0949.fpf

Case 2:05-cv-00949-GEB-DAD Document 6 Filed 07/20/05 Page 2 of 2