Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT 

OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF 

SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099 

tboutrous@gibsondunn.com 

DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289 

dwongyang@gibsondunn.com 

MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308 

mmcrae@gibsondunn.com 

THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 

tevangelis@gibsondunn.com 

DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, 

SBN 254433 

dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com 

BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325 

bstoker@gibsondunn.com 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 

Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 

jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com 

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289 

kringdowell@gibsondunn.com 

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 

Telephone: 415.393.8200 

Facsimile: 415.393.8306 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN 

GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI 

MAHAMMED, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN 

GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 

THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL 

ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT 

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF 

SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR 

OPPOSITION 

Date: August 6, 2015 

Time: 1:30 pm 

Place: Courtroom 5 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice 

ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 

Boston, MA 02116 

Telephone: (617) 994-5800 

Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 

sliss@llrlaw.com 

apagano@llrlaw.com 

MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242 

CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES 

100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 817-1470 

mcarlson@carlsonlegalservices.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI MAHAMMED, 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 76 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT 

OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF 

SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan 

Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves, 

and Travis Kalanick, (“Defendants”),(collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree that the date for 

Defendants to file their reply in support of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration currently 

scheduled for June 30, 2015, be moved to July 8, 2015, and that Plaintiffs be permitted to file a brief 

supplement to their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration no later than July 1, 

2015: 

 WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration is currently scheduled 

for August 6, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs plan to seek leave to file a brief supplement to their Opposition to 

Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration (Doc. 72) by July 1, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, this supplement will further clarify and lend support to Plaintiffs’ argument and 

will aid the Court in its consideration of Defendants’ Motion; 

 WHEREAS, the Court and parties will not be prejudiced by a brief delay in the filing of 

Defendants’ Reply Memorandum until July 8, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, this extra time will permit Defendants to respond to the brief supplement that 

Plaintiffs plan to submit in support of their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration 

(Doc. 72) by July 1, 2015; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that: 

(1) The due date for Defendants’ Reply in Support of their Motion to Compel Arbitration 

currently set for June 30, 2015, be moved to July 8, 2015; 

(2) Plaintiffs be permitted to submit an Administrative Motion to Supplement their 

Opposition Brief (Doc. 72) no later than July 1, 2015. 

/ / / 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 76 Filed 06/30/15 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT 

OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF 

SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON 

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto. 

Dated: June 29, 2015 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN 

ADELAIDE PAGANO 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

MATTHEW CARLSON 

CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES 

By: /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

HAKAN YUCESOY AND ABDI MAHAMMED, 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated 

Dated: June 29, 2015 THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. 

DEBRA WONG YANG 

MARCELLUS A. MCRAE 

THEANE D. EVANGELIS 

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ 

DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA 

BRANDON J. STOKER 

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By: /s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and 

TRAVIS KALANICK

 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 76 Filed 06/30/15 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT 

OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF 

SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITON 

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: ____________________ 

 Hon. Edward M. Chen

6/30/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 76 Filed 06/30/15 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 76 Filed 06/30/15 Page 5 of 5