Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01843/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01843-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1843

DIANE MARIE GROTH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PAUL M. NAKASONE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-02569-JKB)

Submitted: December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Diane Marie Groth, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1843 Doc: 14 Filed: 12/23/2019 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Diane Marie Groth appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary 

judgment on Groth’s retaliation, age and gender discrimination, and harassment claims, 

brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 

2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2019). We have reviewed the record in conjunction with 

the arguments raised on appeal and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s order. See Groth v. Nakasone, No. 1:16-cv-02569-JKB (D. Md. filed July 

18, 2019 & entered July 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1843 Doc: 14 Filed: 12/23/2019 Pg: 2 of 2