Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00828/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00828-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Raul Hernandez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

This action is proceeding against Defendants R. D. Smith and L. Kirk for deliberate 

indifference to Plaintiff’s dental needs.

On May 13, 2013, Defendant L. Kirk filed an answer to the third amended complaint. On 

November 7, 2013, the Court issued a discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 30.) 

On April 11, 2014, Defendant R.D. Smith filed an answer to the first amended complaint. 

(ECF No. 35.)

///

///

///

///

RAUL HERNANDEZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

R.D. SMITH, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:09-cv-00828-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND 

SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES SET FORTH 

IN COURT’S NOVEMBER 7, 2014 ORDER TO 

DEFENDANT R.D. SMITH

[ECF Nos. 30, 34, 35]

Case 1:09-cv-00828-AWI-SAB Document 36 Filed 04/15/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In light of the fact that the discovery and scheduling order was issued prior to the filing of 

Defendant Smith’s answer, Defendant R.D. Smith is advised that the discovery and scheduling order 

issued November 7, 2013, is extended and made applicable to him as well as Defendant L. Kirk. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2014 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00828-AWI-SAB Document 36 Filed 04/15/14 Page 2 of 2