Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01556/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01556-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS HAUSCHILD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF RICHMOND, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-01556 WHA

ORDER RE MOTION FOR

DETERMINATION THAT

PLAINTIFF IS NOT ENTITLED

TO A JURY TRIAL

This order clarifies that plaintiff’s claim for violation of POBR, the only claim

remaining in this case (Dkt. No. 78), shall proceed to a bench trial. This is based on plaintiff’s

counsel’s previous representations that the POBR issue would be tried before the judge (Dkt.

No. 108-1 Exh. A at 3:25–4:9). A subsequent order continuing the trial date erred in setting a

jury trial (Dkt. No. 100). This order corrects that mistake.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 22, 2016. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-01556-WHA Document 120 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 1