Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03445/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03445-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

NEW YORK

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7514579.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

CMC AND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT (NO. 06-3445) 

JOHN H. HEMANN (SBN 165823) 

JOSEPH E. FLOREN (SBN 168292) 

BENJAMIN P. SMITH (SBN 197551) 

CHRISTOPHER J. BANKS (SBN 218779) 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

E-mail: jhemann@morganlewis.com 

 jfloren@morganlewis.com 

 bpsmith@morganlewis.com 

 cbanks@morganlewis.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Jeffrey L. Hall, Richard P. 

Wallace, and Nominal Defendant KLA-Tencor 

Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION 

SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE 

LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS 

Case No. C-06-03445-JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:06-cv-03445-JW Document 103 Filed 05/31/07 Page 1 of 7
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

NEW YORK

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7514579.1 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

CMC AND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT (NO. 06-3445) 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate and agree, by and through their undersigned 

counsel of record, as follows: 

WHEREAS, on February 20, 2007, Lead Plaintiff Alaska Electrical Pension Fund, 

derivatively on behalf of KLA-Tencor Corporation (“Lead Plaintiff”), filed an Amended 

Consolidated Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint (“Amended Consolidated Complaint”) in 

this consolidated action, 

WHEREAS, upon the prior stipulation of all parties, the Court stayed all response deadlines 

and proceedings in this action until June 11, 2007 on account of initial discussions regarding the 

potential resolution of this action between counsel for Lead Plaintiff and counsel for Nominal 

Defendant KLA-Tencor Corporation (“KLA-Tencor”) and its Special Litigation Committee 

(“SLC”), 

WHEREAS, counsel for Lead Plaintiff, KLA-Tencor, and the SLC met and discussed 

settlement possibilities on May 22, 2007, and have agreed to continue their discussions with the 

assistance of a mediator, who has yet to be selected, with the expectation that further substantive 

settlement discussions will follow promptly with all parties, and 

WHEREAS, all parties have agreed that response deadlines and further proceedings in this 

litigation should continue to be stayed on the terms and conditions set forth below in order to allow 

productive settlement discussions to ensue. 

STIPULATION 

Now, therefore, the parties agree and stipulate, subject to Court approval, as follows: 

1. All proceedings in this action will remain stayed until June 25, 2007. Absent 

further order of the Court, Defendants shall file and serve their responsive pleading(s) or motions 

to the Amended Consolidated Complaint by no later than June 25, 2007 

2. The next Case Management Conference in this case, currently scheduled for June 4, 

2007 at 10:00 a.m., shall be continued until June 18, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. or the next date thereafter 

available on the Court’s calendar, at which time the parties will update the Court regarding the 

status of their discussions and whether they believe a further continuation of the stay of this action 

Case 5:06-cv-03445-JW Document 103 Filed 05/31/07 Page 2 of 7
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

NEW YORK

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7514579.1 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

CMC AND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT (NO. 06-3445) 

would be productive in order to foster settlement and, if so, the length of any such continued stay. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: May 30, 2007 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

 JOHN H. HEMANN 

 JOSEPH E. FLOREN 

 BENJAMIN P. SMITH 

 By: /s/___ 

 Joseph E. Floren 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Telephone: (415) 442-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 442-1001 

 

Attorneys for Defendants Jeffrey L. Hall, 

Richard P. Wallace, and Nominal Defendant 

KLA-Tencor Corporation 

I, Joseph E. Floren, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that each of the 9 signatories identified below has concurred in this filing. 

DATED: May 30, 2007 LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP

SHAWN A. WILLIAMS 

MONIQUE C. WINKLER 

AELISH M. BAIG 

/s/ 

SHAWN A. WILLIAMS 

100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415/288-4545 

415/288-4534 (fax) 

Case 5:06-cv-03445-JW Document 103 Filed 05/31/07 Page 3 of 7
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

NEW YORK

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7514579.1 4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

CMC AND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT (NO. 06-3445) 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

WILLIAM S. LERACH 

DARREN J. ROBBINS 

TRAVIS E. DOWNS III 

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 

San Diego, CA 92101-3301 

Telephone: 619/231-1058 

619/231-7423 (fax) 

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

 

DATED: May 30, 2007 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

 KEVIN P. MUCK

DEAN S. KRISTY 

 By: /s/ 

 Kevin P. Muck 

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Tel. 415-875-2300 

Fax: 415-281-1350 

Attorneys for Defendants Edward W. Barnholt, 

H. Raymond Bingham, Robert J. Boehlke, 

Robert T. Bond, Richard J. Elkus, Jr., and Lida 

Urbanek 

DATED: May 30, 2007 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

 WALTER F. BROWN, JR. 

 ROBERT P. VARIAN

 By: /s/ 

 Robert P. Varian 

405 Howard Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Tel. 415-773-5700 

Fax: 415-773-5759 

Attorneys for Defendant Gary Dickerson 

Case 5:06-cv-03445-JW Document 103 Filed 05/31/07 Page 4 of 7
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

NEW YORK

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7514579.1 5 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

CMC AND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT (NO. 06-3445) 

DATED: May 30, 2007 MORRISON & FOERSTER 

 CRAIG D. MARTIN 

 K.C. ALLAN WALDRON

 By: /s/ 

 Craig D. Martin 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 268-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 238-7522 

Attorneys for Defendant John H. Kispert 

DATED: May 30, 2007 SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 

 PATRICK D. ROBBINS 

 JEFFREY S. FACTER 

 ALICIA G. HUFFMAN 

 By: /s/ 

 Jeffrey S. Facter 

525 Market Street, Suite 1500 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 616-1100 

Facsimile: (415) 616-1199 

Attorneys for Defendant Kenneth Levy 

DATED: May 30, 2007 LAW OFFICE OF MARK A. BELNICK, LLC 

 MARK A. BELNICK (admitted pro hac vice) 

 

 By: /s/ 

 Mark A. Belnick 

120 West 45th Street, Suite 1700B 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: 646-453-2901 

Fax: 646-453-2908 

CHRISTOPHER D. KERCHER (pro hac vice) 

 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

590 Madison Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Tel 212-872-1000 

STEVEN S. KAUFHOLD 

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

580 California Street, 15th Floor 

Case 5:06-cv-03445-JW Document 103 Filed 05/31/07 Page 5 of 7
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

NEW YORK

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7514579.1 6 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

CMC AND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT (NO. 06-3445) 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Tel: 415-765-9500 

Fax: 415-765-9501 

Attorneys for Defendant Stuart J. Nichols 

DATED: May 30, 2007 RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP 

 MILES F. EHRLICH 

 

 By: /s/ 

 Miles F. Ehrlich 

803 Hearst Avenue 

Berkeley, CA 94710 

Telephone: 510-548-3600 

Attorneys for Defendant Arthur Schnitzer 

DATED: May 30, 2007 DLA PIPER US LLP 

 SHIRLI FABBRI WEISS 

 DAVID A. PRIEBE 

 

 By: /s/ 

 David A. Priebe 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 833-2056 

Facsimile : (650) 833-2001 

Attorneys for Defendant Kenneth L. Schroeder 

DATED: May 30, 2007 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

 MICHAEL J. SHEPARD 

 WARRINGTON S. PARKER, III 

 By: /s/ 

 Michael J. Shepard 

333 Bush Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-6000 

Facsimile: (415) 772-6268 

Attorneys for Defendant Jon D. Tompkins 

Case 5:06-cv-03445-JW Document 103 Filed 05/31/07 Page 6 of 7
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

NEW YORK

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7514579.1 7 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

CMC AND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT (NO. 06-3445) 

O R D E R

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. All proceedings in this action will remain stayed until June 25, 2007. Absent 

further order of the Court, Defendants shall file and serve their responsive pleading(s) or motions 

to the Amended Consolidated Complaint by no later than June 25, 2007 

2. The next Case Management Conference in this case, currently scheduled for June 4, 

2007 at 10:00 a.m., shall be continued until June 18, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. or the next date thereafter 

available on the Court’s calendar, at which time the parties will update the Court regarding the 

status of their discussions and whether they believe a further continuation of the stay of this action 

would be productive in order to foster settlement and, if so, the length of any such continued stay. 

SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ______________, 2007 

 Hon. James Ware 

 United States District Judge 

May 31 _________ July 23, 2007

Case 5:06-cv-03445-JW Document 103 Filed 05/31/07 Page 7 of 7