Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01318/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01318-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROYCE KEVIN HOUSTON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

A. SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

)

____________________________________)

1:06-CV-1318 AWI YNP SMS

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS 

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

PAY FILING FEE

(Document #28 & #33)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner who is a proceeding with a civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On October 23, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations,

recommending that the court deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss but order Plaintiff to pay the

filing fee for this action. The Findings and Recommendations gave notice that any party could

file objections within thirty days. On December 14, 2009, Plaintiff filed objections. On

January 19, 2009, Plaintiff filed a supplement to his objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

(9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the Findings and th

Case 1:06-cv-01318-AWI -SKO Document 40 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed October 23, 2009, are ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. Plaintiff’s IFP status is REVOKED;

3. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED; 

4. Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the remaining balance of the $350.00 filing fee

within thirty days of this order’s date of service; and

5. Plaintiff is forewarned that failure to pay the filing fee will result in this action’s

dismissal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 9, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:06-cv-01318-AWI -SKO Document 40 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 2