Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235-146/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

To the extent the administrative motion sought to seal the entirety of Exhibits D, E,

H, and I to the Ondrick Declaration and related portions of the Opposition, the Court

granted the motion.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR

INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.

Defendants. /

No. C 09-5235 MMC

ORDER RE: FAIRCHILD’S MOTION TO

FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF ITS

OPPOSITION TO POWER

INTEGRATIONS’S MOTION TO

EXCLUDE GU-YEON WEI, AND

SUPPORTING EXHIBITS; DIRECTIONS

TO FAIRCHILD

Before the Court is an administrative motion to file under seal, filed September 14,

2015, by defendants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor

Corporation, and Fairchild Corporation (collectively, “Fairchild”), pursuant to Civil Local

Rule 79-5, by which Fairchild seeks permission to seal the entirety of Exhibits B and D - I to

the Declaration of Christina A. Ondrick (“Ondrick Declaration”) filed in support of “Fairchild’s

Opposition to Power Integrations’ Motion to Exclude Certain Testimony of Dr. Wei,” as well

as portions of Fairchild’s opposition that refer to said exhibits. 

By order filed October 26, 2015, the Court deferred ruling on the administrative

motion to the extent it sought to seal the entirety of Exhibits B, F, and G to the Declaration

of Christina Ondrick (“Ondrick Declaration”) and related portions of the Opposition.1

 By the

same order, the Court directed each party to file a supplemental response identifying the

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 945 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

portions of said exhibits and motion that contain that party’s confidential information. On

November 9, 2015, each party timely filed its supplemental response. Having read and

considered the supplemental responses, the Court hereby rules as follows.

In their supplemental responses, the parties state that Exhibits B, F, and G do not

contain confidential material.

Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES the administrative motion to the extent it

seeks to seal portions of Exhibit B, F, and G to the Ondrick Declaration and related portions

of the Opposition, and Fairchild is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public record, no later

than February 2, 2016, the unredacted version of each said exhibit, and a version of the

Opposition with only those portions redacted that reference Exhibits D, E, H, and I to the

Ondrick Declaration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2016 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 945 Filed 01/26/16 Page 2 of 2