Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_10-cv-00225/USCOURTS-almd-2_10-cv-00225-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CURTIS and RITA PARRIS, )

 )

Plaintiffs, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv225-WHA

 )

CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ) (WO)

et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #44),

entered on March 8, 2011. No timely objection having been filed, and after a review of this case,

the court adopts the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand

(Doc. #20) should be denied, and that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #6) be granted. 

Furthermore, the court has considered Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Second) or, in the

Alternative, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Directed Verdict (Doc. #38), and finds that the same

reasoning contained in the Recommendation dictates that these motions also be denied. 

Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Doc. #20), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand (Second)

(Doc. #38), and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Directed Verdict (Doc. #38) are DENIED.

2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #6) is GRANTED, and this case is

DISMISSED.

3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.

DONE this 23rd day March, 2011.

Case 2:10-cv-00225-WHA-CSC Document 46 Filed 03/23/11 Page 1 of 2
/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-00225-WHA-CSC Document 46 Filed 03/23/11 Page 2 of 2