Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03244/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03244-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (S.B.N. 074414) 

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, 

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 

1832-A Capitol Street 

Vallejo, CA 94590 

Telephone: (415) 444-5800 

Facsimile: (415) 674-9900

Email: tfrankovich@disabilitieslaw.com

 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

IRMA RAMIREZ and 

DAREN HEATHERLY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IRMA RAMIREZ and DAREN 

HEATHERLY, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ORIGINAL US RESTAURANT; 501 

COLUMBUS LLC; and TRINACRIA 

BROS., INC., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03244-JST 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

 

 The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this 

action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2). Outside of the terms of 

the Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”) herein, each side is to bear its 

own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

 The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over 

enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994) 

(empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement 

agreements). 

Case 3:14-cv-03244-JST Document 25 Filed 12/17/15 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action 

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action become and hereby is 

dismissed with prejudice. 

 This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall 

constitute one original document. 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 

Dated: December 17, 2015 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, 

 A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 

 By: /s/ Thomas E. Frankovich 

 Thomas E. Frankovich 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: December 17, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF MARC LIBARLE 

 By: /s/ Mark Libarle 

 Marc Libarle 

 Attorney for Defendants 

ORDER

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2) and each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. IT IS 

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing 

the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such enforcement be 

necessary. 

Dated: _____________, 2015 

 

 Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

December 17

Case 3:14-cv-03244-JST Document 25 Filed 12/17/15 Page 2 of 2