Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-01312/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-01312-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDY PORFIRIO ALVARADO 

TELLO,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM BARR, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-01312-CRB 

ORDER EXTENDING

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING 

ORDER

Petitioner Fredy Porfirio Alvarado Tello’s filed an Emergency Motion for a 

Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) and Preliminary Injunction. Motion (Dkt. 3). The 

Court granted that motion and enjoined Respondents from detaining Petitioner for fourteen 

days, until 5:00 p.m. on March 26, 2019. Order (Dkt. 9). Subsequently, Respondents filed 

a Response to the Petition opposing the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Response 

(Dkt. 11). 

Respondents contend that “United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement 

(‘ICE’) will be moving the Board of Immigration Appeals (‘BIA’) to reconsider its 

decision no later than April 1, 2019 (‘Motion to Reconsider’) and will not re-arrest 

Petitioner pending the BIA’s decision on the Motion to Reconsider absent a material 

change in circumstances, e.g., a new criminal arrest or conviction, failure to comply with 

the bond conditions set by the Immigration Judge (‘IJ’), denial of immigration relief or

removal order.” Id. at 1-2; see also id. Exh. 1 (Auer Decl.).

However, Respondents have not, as far this Court is aware, yet filed a Motion to

Reconsider with the BIA. See generally id. And so Respondents’ assurance that “[w]hile 

Case 3:19-cv-01312-CRB Document 12 Filed 03/20/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:19-cv-01312-CRB Document 12 Filed 03/20/19 Page 2 of 2