Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01539/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01539-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:2 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant.

No. 2:21-cv-1539-TLN-CKD

ORDER

Plaintiff proceeds in this action pro se. This matter was referred to a United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302.

On December 6, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 

within fourteen days. (ECF No. 36.) Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and 

recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a review of this case. Having carefully reviewed this matter, the Court finds 

the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 15, 2021 (ECF No. 36) are 

ADOPTED IN FULL;

Case 2:21-cv-01539-TLN-CKD Document 40 Filed 01/08/25 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the vexatious litigant order (ECF No. 29) is DENIED.

Date: January 7, 2025

___________________________________ 

TROY L. NUNLEY

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:21-cv-01539-TLN-CKD Document 40 Filed 01/08/25 Page 2 of 2