Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-01756/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-01756-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights

---

1

18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC

 18-cv-1756-WQH-KSC

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELANIE CABELKA; D.C.,

J.C., and T.C., by and through 

their GUARDIAN, MELANIE 

CABELKA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; 

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 

HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES; CASEY FAMILY 

PROGRAMS; SARAH WILSON, 

individually; CARLOS OMEDA, 

individually; FATIMAH 

ABDULLAH, individually; 

LAUREL BREDTHAUER, 

individually; MARILYN

SPROAT; and DOES 1 through 

100,

Defendants.

Case Nos.: 18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC

 18-cv-1756-WQH-KSC

 ORDER

Case 3:18-cv-01756-WQH-KSC Document 20 Filed 11/14/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 3
2

18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC

 18-cv-1756-WQH-KSC

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HAYES, Judge:

Before the Court is the Motion to Consolidate (ECF No. 51) filed by Defendants in 

D.C. et al. v. County of San Diego et al., 18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC, and the Motion to 

Consolidate (ECF No. 18) filed by Defendants in Cabelka v. County of San Diego et al.,

18-cv-1756-WQH-KSC.

The County Defendants move the Court to consolidate D.C. et al. v. County of San 

Diego et al., 18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC and Cabelka v. County of San Diego et al., 18-cv1756-WQH-KSC. The record reflects that no party has filed a Notice of Opposition to 

either of the Motions to Consolidate. 

IT IS HERERBY ORDERED that the Motions to Consolidate (ECF No. 51) in D.C.

et al. v. County of San Diego et al., 18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC and (ECF No. 18) in Cabelka 

v. County of San Diego et al., 18-cv-1756-WQH-KSC are GRANTED. D.C. et al. v. 

County of San Diego et al., 18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC and Cabelka v. County of San Diego 

et al., 18-cv-1756-WQH-KSC are consolidated for all purposes. D.C. et al. v. County of 

San Diego et al., 18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC shall be the lead case and all subsequent 

pleadings and motions shall be filed under this caption and case number. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a Second Amended Complaint 

in D.C. et al. v. County of San Diego et al., 18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC containing all of their

claims from D.C. et al. v. County of San Diego et al., 18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC and Cabelka

v. County of San Diego et al., 18-cv-1756-WQH-KSC. Defendants shall respond to the 

Second Amended Complaint within 60 days of the date of the filing of the Second

Amended Complaint. 

Upon the filing of the Second Amended Complaint in D.C. et al. v. County of San 

Diego et al., 18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC, the Clerk of the Court shall administratively close

Cabelka v. County of San Diego et al., 18-cv-1756-WQH-KSC.

Case 3:18-cv-01756-WQH-KSC Document 20 Filed 11/14/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 3
3

18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC

 18-cv-1756-WQH-KSC

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the matter of D.C. et al. v. County of San Diego 

et al., 18-cv-0013-WQH-KSC, Defendants’ Motion to Strike (ECF No. 23), and 

Defendants’ Motionsto Dismiss (ECF Nos. 24, 30, 40) are DENIED as moot. Any motions 

to dismiss or strike may be refiled by Defendants after Plaintiffs’ Second Amended 

Complaint has been filed. 

Dated: November 14, 2018

Case 3:18-cv-01756-WQH-KSC Document 20 Filed 11/14/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 3