Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00006/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00006-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HERMAN D. SHEAD,

Plaintiff,

v.

C/O VANG,

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00006-AWI-SKO PC

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE

(Doc. 64)

FIFTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Herman D. Shead, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 5, 2009. On January 5, 2012, the

Court issued the second scheduling order, which required Plaintiff to file his pretrial statement on

or before July 9, 2012. Plaintiff was warned that the failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

action. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th

Cir. 2006). However, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the order.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show

cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and

failure to prosecute;

2. Defendant is relieved of his obligation to file a pretrial statement pending further

order; and

///

///

///

1

Case 1:09-cv-00006-AWI-SKO Document 70 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action, with

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 31, 2012 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-00006-AWI-SKO Document 70 Filed 08/01/12 Page 2 of 2