Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01363/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01363-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1363

JAMES RONALD PEGGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRIAN SHIPWASH; DAVID WILSON & ROSSABI BLACK SLAUGHTER, 

P.A.; ARRON B. ANDERSON TRUSTEE SERVICE OF CAROLINA LLC; 

BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC; US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 

a/k/a US Bank National Association; WELLS FARGO HOME 

MORTGAGE, a/k/a Wells Fargo Bank Association; SURETY 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00278-RJC)

Submitted: October 21, 2016 Decided: November 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Ronald Peggs, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Hicks Shields, 

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Emily 

Jeffords Meister, Jennifer Lynn Reutter, BLACK SLAUGHTER & 

BLACK, P.A., Greensboro, North Carolina; Franklin Lamont Greene, 

BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; B. Chad Ewing,

Appeal: 16-1363 Doc: 30 Filed: 11/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North 

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1363 Doc: 30 Filed: 11/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

James Ronald Peggs appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Peggs v. Shipwash, No. 3:15-cv-00278-RJC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 

3, 2016; Mar. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1363 Doc: 30 Filed: 11/01/2016 Pg: 3 of 3