Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00846/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00846-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CLAUDIA QUINTANA,

City Attorney, SBN 178613

BY: KELLY J. TRUJILLO, 

Deputy City Attorney, SBN 244286

CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall

555 Santa Clara Street, P.O. Box 3068

Vallejo, CA 94590

Tel: (707) 648-4545

Fax: (707) 648-4687

MARK A. JONES, SBN 96494

KRISTEN K. PRESTON, SBN 125455

JONES & DYER

A Professional Corporation

1800 J Street

Sacramento, CA 95811

Tel: (916) 552-5959

Fax: (916) 442-5959

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal corporation; 

SEAN KENNEY; WAYLON BOYCE, MARK THOMPSON 

individually and in their official capacities as Police Officers for the CITY OF VALLEJO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT

THE ESTATE OF ANTON BARRETT, by 

and through its representatives ANTON 

FRANK BARRETT, PASHANEY 

BARRETT AND A.P.B., a minor, by and 

through his guardian ad litem TASHA 

PERRY; ANTON FRANK BARRETT, 

individually, PASHANEY BARRETT, 

individually and A.P.B., a minor, by and 

through his guardian ad litem, TASHA 

PERRY, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal 

corporation; SEAN KENNEY; WAYLON 

BOYCE, MARK THOMPSON; AND 

DOES 1-50, inclusive; individually and in 

their official capacities as Police Officers 

for the CITY OF VALLEJO,

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:13-CV-00846-JAM-CKD 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 2:13-cv-00846-JAM-CKD Document 36 Filed 02/20/15 Page 1 of 5
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In order to protect the confidentiality of the records described below, any of said records 

disclosed are designated as “Confidential Material” pursuant to the protective order previously 

entered by this court (Docket No. 13) or designated “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” in this 

Order as follows:

1. Documents designated as “Confidential Material” include:

a. Vallejo Police Department Training Program and Approved External 

Training Calendar, 2010-2014 (DEF 997-1023)

b. K9 use of force effectiveness statistics Dec. 2012 to Dec. 2014 (DEF 937)

2. Documents designated as “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” include:

a. Sean Kenney POST Profile report (DEF 912-918)

b. Mark Thompson POST Profile report. (DEF 923-926)

c. Waylon Boyce POST Profile report. (DEF 919-922)

d. Employee history – Officer Mark Thompson. Citizen Complaints and 

Administrative Investigations regarding alleged use of excessive force, 

allegations of dishonesty and/or planting evidence, and/or racial 

discrimination/racial profiling/disparate treatment, and Critical Incidents 

involving officer’s deployment of K9 resulting in injury or death, 2008-

2012 (DEF 931-933)

e. Employee history – Waylon Boyce. Citizen Complaints and 

Administrative Investigations regarding alleged use of excessive force, 

allegations of dishonesty and/or planting evidence, and/or racial 

discrimination/racial profiling/disparate treatment, and Critical Incidents 

involving officer’s deployment of K9 resulting in injury or death, 2008-

2012 (DEF 934-936)

f. Employee History- Detective Sean Kenney: Citizen Complaints and 

Administrative Investigations regarding alleged use of excessive force, 

allegations of dishonesty and/or planting evidence, and/or racial 

discrimination/racial profiling/disparate treatment, and Critical Incidents 

Case 2:13-cv-00846-JAM-CKD Document 36 Filed 02/20/15 Page 2 of 5
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

involving officer’s discharge of firearm resulting in injury or death, 2008-

2012 (DEF 927-930)

g. IA Report Barrett (DEF 938-940)

h. IA Report 2009 Thompson/Yago (DEF 941-996)

3. Counsel who receive documents designated as “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes 

Only”, as well as information contained in such designated documents, may disclose such 

documents and/or information only subject to the provisions of this Stipulation and Order and only 

to the following persons:

a. Counsel for any party to this action.

b. Paralegal, stenographic, clerical and secretarial personnel regularly 

employed by counsel referred to in 4(a);

c. Court personnel including stenographic reporters engaged in such 

proceedings as are necessarily incidental to preparation for the trial of this 

action;

d. Any outside expert or consultant retained in connection with this action, 

and not otherwise employed by either party;

e. Any expert designated to testify at trial in this matter; and

f. The parties agree that at the time of trial Defendants may seek orders from 

the Court to prevent CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY 

Materials disclosed during discovery from being made public during a jury 

trial.

4. Each person to whom disclosure of documents designated “Confidential – Attorney’s 

Eyes Only” is made, with the exception of counsel who are presumed to know of the contents of 

this protective order, shall, prior to disclosure: (1) be provided with a copy of this order by the 

person furnishing him/her such material, and (2) agree on the record or in writing that she/he has 

read the protective order and that she/he understand the provisions of the protective order. Such 

person must also consent to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court, Eastern 

District, with respect to any proceeding relating to the enforcement of this order. Defendants City 

Case 2:13-cv-00846-JAM-CKD Document 36 Filed 02/20/15 Page 3 of 5
4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

of Vallejo, W. Boyce, S. Kenney and M. Thompson shall be entitled to retain possession of the 

original writings described above. Nothing in this paragraph 3 is intended to prevent officials or 

employees of the City of Vallejo or other authorized government officials or any other persons from 

having access to the documents if they would have had access in the normal course of their job 

duties or rights as a citizen. Further, nothing in this order prevents a witness from disclosing event 

or activities personal to them, i.e., a witness can disclose to others previous information given to the 

City of Vallejo with respect to what she/he saw, heard, or otherwise sensed.

5. At the conclusion of the trial and of any appeal or upon other termination of this 

litigation, all CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Material received under the 

provision of this order (including any copies made) shall be returned to the City of Vallejo and no 

copies of any so-designated material shall be retained by the attorneys for plaintiffs or any of their 

agents, employees, consultants or experts. Provisions of this order insofar as they restrict disclosure 

and use of the material shall be in effect until all documents designated “Confidential – Attorney’s 

Eyes Only” (including all copies thereof) are returned to defendants.

6. Any document filed with the Court that includes or otherwise incorporates material 

designated or derived from materials designated “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” shall be 

filed under seal pursuant to the procedures required by the F.R.C.P and/or applicable Local Rules of 

Court and labeled with a cover sheet as follows: “Barrett v. City of Vallejo, et al., United States 

District Court, Eastern District, Case No.: 2:13-CV-00846-JAM-CKD. This document is subject to 

a protective order issued by the Court and may not be copied or examined except in compliance 

with that order.” Documents so labeled shall be kept by the Clerk under seal and shall be made 

available only to the Court or counsel. Upon failure of the party to so file a document under seal, 

the producing party may request that the Court place the filing under seal.

7. The foregoing is without prejudice to the right of any party (a) to apply to the Court 

for a further protective order relating to designation of any other documents as “Confidential 

Material” and/or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only”; (b) to apply to the Court for an order 

removing the “Confidential Material” and/or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” designation 

from any document; and (c) to apply to the Court for an order compelling production of documents 

Case 2:13-cv-00846-JAM-CKD Document 36 Filed 02/20/15 Page 4 of 5
5

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

or modification of this order or for any order permitting disclosure of and material designated 

“Confidential Material” and/or “Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only” beyond the terms of this 

order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 19, 2015

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:13-cv-00846-JAM-CKD Document 36 Filed 02/20/15 Page 5 of 5