Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00397/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00397-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHERIE WHITE, )

) 02:04-cv-397-GEB-CMK

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER

v. )

) 

CINEMARK USA, INC., dba )

CINEMARK MOVIES 8, )

)

Defendant. )

)

On March 17, 2006, Defendant filed an application to hear

its “Motion for Continuance, for a Stay, and for Leave to File

Dispositive Motions” on shortened time arguing that the motion must be

heard on shortened time because trial is scheduled to commence on

April 4, 2006. On March 22, 2006, the trial date was rescheduled from

April 4, 2006, to September 12, 2006, due to a conflict with an

ongoing criminal trial. This sua sponte decision to reschedule the

trial moots Defendant’s application and motion for continuance of the

trial commencement date. Defendant’s motion for a stay is denied

since the motion does not satisfy the applicable Rule 16 standard. 

Further, since Defendant’s motion for leave to file dispositive

Case 2:04-cv-00397-GEB -CMK Document 160 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

motions is premised on the existence of “new facts” that will only

arise “if Yuba City approves [Defendant’s] use permit application” and

Defendant “proceed[s] with reconstruction of the Theatre,” the motion

is not yet ripe for decision and therefore is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 29, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00397-GEB -CMK Document 160 Filed 03/30/06 Page 2 of 2