Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-490/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Master File No. 3:07-CV-05944-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL DISCLOSURES

[Stipulating parties listed on signature page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

Master File No. 3:07-CV-05944-JST 

MDL No. 1917

This Document Relates To: 

Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corp. v. LG 

Electronics, Inc., et al, Case No. 11-cv-05514

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE 

FOR PRETRIAL DISCLOSURES FOR 

SEARS/KMART AND LG 

ELECTRONICS

 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 4781 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- Master File No. 3:07-CV-05944-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL DISCLOSURES

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corporation (“Plaintiffs”) are 

the only remaining plaintiffs in Case No. 11-cv-05514 (“Sears/Kmart case”); 

WHEREAS, LG Electronics, Inc. (“LGE”) is the only remaining defendant in the 

Sears/Kmart case; 

WHEREAS, the trial in the Sears/Kmart case is set for January 9, 2017, see ECF No. 

4658; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and LGE have negotiated and agreed to a schedule governing 

pretrial disclosures; 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-12, PLAINTIFFS AND LGE, BY AND THROUGH 

THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The parties agree to abide by the schedule governing pretrial disclosures that is 

attached as Exhibit A to this stipulation. As noted in Footnote 3 of Exhibit A, LGE stipulates 

only that the attached schedule applies to the jury trial. As part of its motion for bifurcation and 

for a bench trial, see ECF No. 4759, LGE has proposed a separate schedule to govern bench 

trial pretrial disclosures. Plaintiffs oppose any bifurcation of the trial proceedings and do not 

consent to the bench trial schedule proposed by LGE. 

2. This stipulation shall not be introduced into evidence during the jury trial or read 

to the jury during trial, and it shall not be relied on to support an entitlement to any relief not 

expressly contemplated by the terms of this stipulation. 

 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 4781 Filed 08/17/16 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- Master File No. 3:07-CV-05944-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL DISCLOSURES

Dated: August 17, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

By: /s/ Brad Brian 

Brad Brian (State Bar No. 079001) 

brad.brian@mto.com 

Gregory J. Weingart (State Bar No. 157997) 

gregory.weingart@mto.com 

Susan E. Nash (State Bar No. 101837) 

susan.nash@mto.com 

E. Martin Estrada (State Bar No. 223802) 

martin.estrada@mto.com 

Miriam Kim (State Bar No. 238230) 

miriam.kim@mto.com 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071-1560 

Telephone: (213) 683-9100 

Facsimile:(213) 687-3702

Attorneys for Defendant LG Electronics, Inc. 

KENNY NACHWALTER, P.A. 

By: /s/ William J. Blechman 

Richard Alan Arnold, Esquire 

William J. Blechman, Esquire 

Douglas Patton, Esquire 

Samuel J. Randall, Esquire 

Christina Ceballos-Levy 

KENNY NACHWALTER, P.A.

201 S. Biscayne Boulevard 

Suite 1100 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Tel: (305) 373-1000 

Fax: (305) 372-1861 

E-mail: rarnold@knpa.com 

 wblechman@knpa.com 

 dpatton@knpa.com 

 srandall@knpa.com 

 ccl@knpa.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co. 

and Kmart Corp.

 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 4781 Filed 08/17/16 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3- Master File No. 3:07-CV-05944-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL DISCLOSURES

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 

It is so stipulated and agreed to by the parties. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 17, 2016 Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

 United States District Judge 

547566.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 4781 Filed 08/17/16 Page 4 of 4