Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07336/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07336-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

NO. C06 7336 PJH STIPULATION 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

RODERICK G. DORMAN (SBN 96908) 

dormanr@hbdlawyers.com

ALAN P. BLOCK (SBN 143783) 

blocka@hbdlawyers.com

BLESS YOUNG (SBN 112104) 

youngb@hbdlawyers.com

KEVIN SHENKMAN (SBN 223315) 

shenkmank@hbdlawyers.com 

865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2900 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (213) 694-1200 

Facsimile: (213) 694-1234 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

SPEEDTRACK, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SPEEDTRACK, INC. 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., THE HERTZ 

CORPORATION, MAGELLAN 

NAVIGATION, INC., and TOYOTA MOTOR 

SALES, U.S.A., INC. 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 06-CV-07336-PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

SPEEDTRACK, INC. TO RESPOND TO 

ENDECA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S 

COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 74 Filed 05/10/07 Page 1 of 3
NO. C06 7336 PJH STIPULATION

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between SpeedTrack, Inc. and Endeca Technologies, 

Inc., by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, that the time within which SpeedTrack 

may respond to Endeca’s complaint in intervention shall be extended to Friday, May 25, 2007. 

SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: May 8, 2007 HENNIGAN BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

By /S/ Roderick G. Dorman 

Roderick G. Dorman

Attorneys for Plaintiff, SPEEDTRACK, INC. 

DATED: May 8, 2007 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 

By /S/ Richard Myrus 

Richard Myrus

Attorneys for ENDECA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Complainant-in-Intervention 

O R D E R

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

United States District Judge 

05/09/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 74 Filed 05/10/07 Page 2 of 3
NO. C06 7336 PJH STIPULATION

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO 

GENERAL ORDER NO. 45, XB – ELECTRONIC CASE FILING 

The undersigned hereby attests that he/she has obtained the concurrence in the filing of this 

document from each signatory whose ECF User ID and Password is not utilized in the electronic 

filing of this document. 

Executed on May 8, 2007 at Los Angeles, California. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

DATED: May 8, 2007 By /S/ Roderick G. Dorman 

Roderick G. Dorman

Attorneys for Plaintiff, SPEEDTRACK, INC. 

Case 4:06-cv-07336-PJH Document 74 Filed 05/10/07 Page 3 of 3