Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-2_04-cv-03086/USCOURTS-alnd-2_04-cv-03086-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVIS TRUCKING COMPANY, et

al.,

Defendants.

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

CIVIL ACTION NO.

04-AR-3086-S

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 20, 2005, this court entered a judgment declaring

that plaintiff, Progressive Specialty Insurance Company

(“Progressive”), is not obligated to provide a defense for

defaulting defendants, Davis Trucking Company and Willie J. Davis,

or to indemnify either of them, with respect to any claims made

against them in CV-04-03489-S, pending in the Circuit Court of

Jefferson County, Alabama.

On August 28, 2005, Progressive filed a motion for summary

judgment against all other defendants, who were thereupon ordered

to respond to the motion by September 12, 2005. No defendant

responded, and, in fact, some have indicated affirmatively by

telephone that they do not resist Progressive’s motion. Under the

circumstances, the court adopts the undisputed facts as they are

stated in the brief and evidentiary materials filed by Progressive

in support of its motion, and the conclusions of law that it asks

the court to reach.

FILED

 2005 Nov-01 PM 02:37

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 2:04-cv-03086-WMA Document 38 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 2
An appropriate order of final summary judgment will be

separately entered.

DONE this 1 day of November, 2005. st

_____________________________

WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-03086-WMA Document 38 Filed 11/01/05 Page 2 of 2