Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03059/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03059-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS

HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND

FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

ATOLL TOPUI ISLAND, INC., a California

corporation, and LOPETI KITEAU TOPUI, an

individual, 

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

No. C 06-3059

 

ORDER

[Docket No. 27]

This matter comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Brazil's Report and Recommendation

(R&R) on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment. Neither party has filed any objections to the R&R.

Having considered the report, and the recommendations therein, and for good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Magistrate Judge Brazil's Report and Recommendation [Docket No.

27] is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED as

set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against

Defendants in the amount of $43,809.25. Plaintiffs are permitted to move the Court to amend the

Judgment to reflect additional interest on the unpaid contributions accrued from October 26, 2006

through the date of Judgment. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendants shall submit to an audit for the period July 1,

2004 through the present, and shall provide relevant records requested by the auditor. Plaintiffs are

Case 4:06-cv-03059-SBA Document 30 Filed 01/22/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

permitted to move the Court to amend the Judgment to include additional amounts found owing

following the audit (provided Plaintiffs demonstrate that Defendants had an opportunity to present input

to the auditor, and that Defendants received notice of the auditor’s findings and were given an

opportunity to respond).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 1/22/07 

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-03059-SBA Document 30 Filed 01/22/07 Page 2 of 2