Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01546/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01546-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

Order Granting Defendant William Boyd Ritner’s Request for Additional Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond

Hensley v. United States et al.

2:07-CV-1546 FCD DAD 

D. MARTIN NETHERY (SBN: 66978)

JAMES T. LATTING (SBN: 219978)

Roemer Harnik & Nethery LLP

45-025 Manitou Drive

Indian Wells, California 92210

Phone: (760) 360-2400

Fax: (760) 360-1211

Attorneys for Defendant William Boyd Ritner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Gary Lee Hensley, Wanda Renault Hensley, Terry

Lou Hensley and Barry Lyn Hensley, d.b.a.

Electronic Systems Repair,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Kimberly J. Mueller

as a U.S. District Judge); VENTURA COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT and Michael D. Planet as the

Executive Officer and Clerk; LOS ANGELES

COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and John Clarke as

the Executive Officer and Clerk; William Boyd

Ritner in his representative capacity as the

current/discharged administrator of the Estate Cary

Lewis Hensley; Randolph Winston Coleman and

Clinton Davis as individuals; and all persons

unknown, claiming any legal or equitable right, title,

estate, lien or interest in the properties described in

the complaint adverse to plaintiffs’ title thereto,

named as Does 1 through 10 inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 2:07-CV-1546 FCD DAD PS

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

WILLIAM BOYD RITNER’S REQUEST FOR

ADDITIONAL TIME TO ANSWER OR

OTHERWISE RESPOND

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:07-cv-01546-FCD-DAD Document 26 Filed 09/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

Order Granting Defendant William Boyd Ritner’s Request for Additional Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond

Hensley v. United States et al.

2:07-CV-1546 FCD DAD 

THE DEFENDANT WILLIAM BOYD RITNER’s Ex Parte Application for additional time within

which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint and the supporting papers were filed on August 24,

2007. The Court finds it unnecessary to conduct a hearing on this matter.

After considering the moving and supporting papers, and the arguments of counsel, and all other

matters presented to the Court, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant WILLIAM BOYD RITNER’S ex parte application is

GRANTED and defendant WILLIAM BOYD RITNER is hereby given an additional 30 days in which to

answer or otherwise respond to the complaint.

DATED: September 21, 2007.

Ddad1/orders.prose/hensley1546.eot

Case 2:07-cv-01546-FCD-DAD Document 26 Filed 09/21/07 Page 2 of 2