Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05085/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05085-61/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

PROPOSED ORDER RE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS 

Case No: 3:03-cv-05085-WWS 

LACA_813568.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

William J. Robinson (State Bar No. 83729) 

Victor de Gyarfas (State Bar No. 171950) 

Grant E. Kinsel (State Bar No. 172407) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

2029 Century Park East, 35th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90067-3021 

Tel: 310-277-2223; Fax: 310-557-8475 

Kenneth S. Klein (State Bar No. 129172) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

402 W. Broadway, Suite 2100 

San Diego, CA 92101-3542 

Tel: 619-234-6655; Fax: 619-234-3510 

Scott H. Kaliko, Pro Hac Vice

KALIKO & YEAGER, LLC 

500 N. Franklin Turnpike 

Ramsey, NJ 07446 

Telephone: (201) 831-0575 

scott.kaliko@kalikolaw.com 

Attorneys for FRISKIT, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRISKIT, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

REALNETWORKS, INC., a Washington 

corporation; LISTEN.COM, a California 

corporation, 

Defendants. 

Case No: 3:03-cv-05085-WWS 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF IN OPPOSITION 

TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT EXCEEDING THE LOCAL 

RULE 7-2 PAGE LIMIT 

Case 3:03-cv-05085-WWS Document 751 Filed 06/22/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

PROPOSED ORDER RE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS 

3:03-CV-05085-WWS 

LACA_813568.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Having considered Plaintiff Friskit, Inc.’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File Brief 

in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment Exceeding the Local Rule 7-2 Page Limit, and 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, 

Friskit’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File Brief in Opposition to Motion for 

Summary Judgment Exceeding the Local Rule 7-2 Page Limit is GRANTED. Friskit is 

permitted to file a brief in opposition to motion for summary judgment of 30 pages in length. 

Dated:_____________ _______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

6/21/07

Case 3:03-cv-05085-WWS Document 751 Filed 06/22/07 Page 2 of 3
FRISKIT, INC.’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY 

Case No: 3:03-cv-05085-WWS 

LACA_813568.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on June 16, 2007, I caused the following document: PLAINTIFF 

FRISKIT, INC.’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL HOWREY 

LLP to be filed electronically with the Clerk of Court through ECF, and that ECF will send an enotice of the electronic filing to the following: 

Evette D. Pennypacker 

evettepennypacker@quinnemanuel.com 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

T: (650) 620-4500 

F: (650) 620-4555 

David A. Perlson davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com 

Charles K. Verhoeven 

charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 

Deepak Gupta deepakgupta@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER AND 

HEDGES LLP 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

T: (415) 875-6600 

F: (415) 875-6700 

Dated: June 16, 2007 /s/s Victor de Gyarfas 

 

Case 3:03-cv-05085-WWS Document 751 Filed 06/22/07 Page 3 of 3