Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-02785/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-02785-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 130
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

E-Filed 1/19/16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMERICAN SAFETY CASUALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-02785-HRL 

ORDER DIRECTING CROSSCOMPLAINANT TO FILE MOTION 

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 48

The plaintiff in this case sued two corporations. Both defendants were served, but only 

American Safety Casualty Insurance Company (“ASCIC”) appeared to defend itself. ASCIC filed 

cross-claims against the absent defendant and against two individual cross-defendants. The 

plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its claims and the court closed this case, Dkt. No. 42, but the court

re-opened this case for the limited purpose of permitting ASCIC to seek default judgments against 

the cross-defendants. Dkt. Nos. 45, 46. The Clerk of Court entered defaults against the crossdefendants several months ago, Dkt. No. 48, but ASCIC has not yet moved for default judgment.

ASCIC shall move for default judgment on the cross-claims, if at all, no later than March 

22, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 1/19/16

HOWARD R. LLOYD

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:14-cv-02785-EJD Document 49 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 1