Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-02695/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-02695-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 47:0227(b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTON EWING,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 15cv2695-LAB (DHB)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

AMEND NOTICE OF REMOVAL,

DENYING MOTION TO REMAND

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

vs.

A1 SOLAR POWER, INC. et al.,

Defendants.

Defendants Smart Energy Solar, Inc. and Leo Bautista removed this case from state

court, (Docket no. 1), Ewing moved for remand, (Docket no. 3), and then Smart Energy and

Bautista moved to amend their notice of removal. (Docket no. 4.) In their motion to amend, 

Smart Energy and Bautista contend their amended notice of removal will clarify defective

allegations of jurisdiction made in the original notice of removal. (Docket no. 4 at 5–8.) 

That’s an adequate basis for amendment. See Barrow Dev. Co. v. Fulton Ins. Co., 418 F.2d

316, 317 (9th Cir. 1969). Smart Energy’s and Bautista’s motion to amend is GRANTED. 

They are to file their amended notice of removal within 5 calendar days of this order. Ewing’s

motion for remand is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. He may bring it again once the

amended notice of removal is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 30, 2015

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge

- 1 - 15cv2695

Case 3:15-cv-02695-LAB-DHB Document 7 Filed 12/30/15 Page 1 of 1