Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06482/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06482-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREG BRAUN, CASE NO. CV-F-02-6482 AWI LJO

Plaintiff, ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION

FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME

vs. TO MOVE TO WITHDRAW ADMISSIONS

(Doc. 369)

AGRI-SYSTEMS, 

Defendant.

 / 

The Court has received and reviewed plaintiff Greg Braun’s Ex Parte Application for An Order

Shortening Time to Move to Withdraw Admissions. (Doc. 

The ex parte application is DENIED. The ex parte is based on the lack of time to bring a

regularly noticed motion before the June 6, 2006 trial date. Under this Court’s March 1, 2005

Scheduling Order, all discovery motions were to be filed and decided by January 9, 2006: "All nonexpert

discovery and related discovery motions (including motions to compel) shall be completed or heard no

later than January 9, 2006." (Doc. 94 p. 11, ¶7) (Emphasis in Original.) This Court has consistently

and stringently imposed the deadlines set in the Court’s Scheduling Order in previous motions between

these parties. Braun has not shown good cause for continuing the Scheduling Order deadline. Good

cause cannot be shown because there is a lack of diligence in discovering the admissions in the almost

two years since the lifting of the stay in Agri-Systems’ bankruptcy.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 23, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06482-AWI -LJO Document 382 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 1