Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378-44/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

INFORMATICA'S MOTION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO SUBMIT REVISED DAMAGES 

EXPERT REPORT 

C 02-03378 EDL 

LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB NO. 054283) 

 e-mail: lpasahow@fenwick.com 

J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB NO. 176148) 

 e-mail: dhadden@fenwick.com 

DARREN E. DONNELLY (CSB NO. 194335) 

 e-mail: ddonnelly@fenwick.com 

CAROLYN CHANG (CSB NO. 217933) 

 e-mail: cchang@fenwick.com 

RYAN A. TYZ (CSB NO. 234895) 

 e-mail: rtyz@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB No. 223936) 

 e-mail: dschumann@fenwick.com 

ALBERT L. SIEBER (CSB No. 233482) 

 e-mail: asieber@fenwick.com 

DAVID M. LACY KUSTERS (CSB NO. 241335) 

 e-mail: dlacykusters@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 1200 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, a 

Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA 

INTEGRATION, INC., formerly known as 

ACTA TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 02-03378 EDL 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

INFORMATICA TO SUBMIT 

REVISED DAMAGES EXPERT 

REPORT 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 513 Filed 02/27/07 Page 1 of 4
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

INFORMATICA'S MOTION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO SUBMIT REVISED DAMAGES 

EXPERT REPORT 

2 C 02-03378 EDL 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), Plaintiff Informatica Corp. (“Informatica”) and 

Defendant Business Objects Data Integration, Inc. (“BODI”) hereby stipulate that Informatica be 

allowed additional time to prepare and submit a revised damages expert analysis. 

Pursuant to this Court’s February 23, 2007 Order Following the Pretrial Conference, 

BODI was required to provide Informatica with accurate data on which Informatica is to base its 

damages calculations by February 23. Informatica was given one week from the date of BODI’s 

production to submit a revised damages analysis. Accordingly, Informatica was to provide a 

revised expert analysis by March 2, 2007. See Declaration of Carolyn Chang in Support of 

Stipulation to Extend Time (“Chang Decl.”) ¶ 2. On February 23, 2007, BODI provided a letter 

addressing a subset of transactions, and indicated that it is diligently gathering information 

regarding the remaining transactions. See Id. ¶ 3. BODI indicates that it expects to provide more 

information on Monday, February 26 and possibly additional data thereafter. Id., Ex. A. As 

Informatica is still awaiting information from BODI, Informatica cannot assess when it will be 

able to complete preparation of a revised damages report based on accurate information. Id. ¶ 4. 

Therefore, the parties stipulate that Informatica may have until 5 days after BODI confirms 

production is complete to submit its revised expert report so that Informatica will not be 

prejudiced by any subsequent production of data by BODI. Id. This extension of time will not 

affect other dates set by the Court. Id. ¶ 5. 

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), attached hereto is a Declaration of Carolyn 

Chang setting forth (i) the reasons for the requested enlargement, (ii) disclosure of all previous 

modifications in the case, and (iii) a description of the effect of the requested time modification 

on the schedule for the case. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel that: 

Informatica Corporation shall have until 5 days after BODI confirms that production of 

accurate damages data is complete to submit a revised damages expert analysis based upon the 

revised data. 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 513 Filed 02/27/07 Page 2 of 4
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

INFORMATICA'S MOTION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO SUBMIT REVISED DAMAGES 

EXPERT REPORT 

3 C 02-03378 EDL 

Dated: February 26, 2007 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Carolyn Chang 

Carolyn Chang 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

Dated: February 26, 2007 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND 

CREW LLP 

By: /s/ Leonard J. Augustine 

Leonard J. Augustine 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA 

INTEGRATION, INC. 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 513 Filed 02/27/07 Page 3 of 4
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

INFORMATICA'S MOTION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO SUBMIT REVISED DAMAGES 

EXPERT REPORT 

4 C 02-03378 EDL 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court having reviewed the Stipulation, hereby, for good cause shown, orders: 

1. Informatica Corporation shall have until 5 days after BODI confirms that 

production of accurate damages data is complete to submit a revised damages expert analysis 

based upon the revised data. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February __, 2007 

Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

27

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 513 Filed 02/27/07 Page 4 of 4