Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01286/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01286-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANVILLE H. MARSHALL, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1286 JAM DAD PS

vs.

HAL MEADOWS, et al.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendants.

 /

By order filed and served on June 2, 2010, the court re-set the Status (Pretrial

Scheduling) Conference in this case and ordered that

[w]ithin fourteen (14) days after this order is served, plaintiff shall

serve a copy of this order upon each defendant, either with service

of process, if copies of plaintiff’s complaint and summons have not

yet been served on the defendants, or by regular mail if service of

process has been effected; plaintiff shall promptly file with the

court a certificate of service indicating the date and manner of

service of this order on each defendant[.]

Order Re-Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference (Doc. No. 5), at 2. More than three

weeks have passed, and plaintiff has not filed the required certificate of service.

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff shall file, within fourteen days after this order is

served, a declaration under penalty of perjury showing good cause for his failure to file a

certificate of service indicating the date and manner of service of the court’s June 2, 2010 order

Case 2:10-cv-01286-JAM-DAD Document 19 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

upon each defendant. Plaintiff’s declaration in response to this order to show cause must be

accompanied by the certificate of service required by the court’s June 2, 2010 order. Failure to

respond to this order to show cause in a timely manner may result in a recommendation that this

case be dismissed as a sanction for failure to comply with court orders. See Local Rule 110.

DATED: June 28, 2010.

DAD:kw

Ddad1\orders.prose\marshall1286.osc.pos

Case 2:10-cv-01286-JAM-DAD Document 19 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 2