Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01332/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01332-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 330
Nature of Suit: Federal Employers' Liability
Cause of Action: 45:51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID CHAD GLOW,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

and HOWARD REDMOND, et al.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C-05-1933 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPY IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On November 3, 2006, plaintiff David Glow electronically filed a response to

defendant’s motions in limine. Plaintiff has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on

the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy

of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly

marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See

General Order 45 § VII.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if he fails in the future to comply with the Court’s

order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court may impose

Case 2:08-cv-01332-LKK -EFB Document 72 Filed 11/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any electronically-filed

document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 8, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 2:08-cv-01332-LKK -EFB Document 72 Filed 11/08/06 Page 2 of 2