Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01142/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01142-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 320
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCHERING CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

FIRST DATABANK INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 07-01142 WHA

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE

At the hearing plaintiff’s counsel seemed to argue that none of the “Licensed Products”

referenced in the Licensing Agreement were at issue in this case. But Exhibit 1 to the

agreement, provided to the Court after the hearing, indicates that the National Data Drug File

falls within the definition of “Licensed Products.” The NDDF database is at issue. By NOON

on APRIL 6, 2007, both sides may each file a two-page statement (12-point font, double-spaced)

explaining whether or not the Licensed Products identified in the agreement are at issue in this

case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 5, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-01142-WHA Document 29 Filed 04/05/07 Page 1 of 1