Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04748/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04748-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

PRECOSIA F. PERDIGUERRA, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

MERIDAS CAPITAL, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No: C 09-4748 SBA 

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 

Defendant Meridas Capital, Inc., has filed a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint, 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs subsequently filed a request for 

dismissal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), which allows a plaintiff to 

file “a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for 

summary judgment[.]” Since no summary judgment or answer has been filed in this action, 

Plaintiffs’ request for dismissal is effective upon filing, without the necessity of Court approval. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the instant action is DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk shall close the 

file and terminate any pending matters. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 14, 2010 _______________________________ 

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:09-cv-04748-SBA Document 36 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 1