Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_10-cv-00603/USCOURTS-almd-2_10-cv-00603-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM E. BOWHALL, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:10-CV-603-WKW [WO]

 )

CAPITOL-EMI RECORDS, INC., et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

On October 27, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation

(“Recommendation”).1

 (Doc. # 5.) Plaintiff William E. Bowhall responded by filing a

Motion to Proceed in Pro-Se (Doc. # 6), which is construed liberally as an objection. The

court has conducted a de novo review of all pleadings and documents in this action, including

the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation and Mr. Bowhall’s objection. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1). Based upon that review, the court finds that the objection lacks merit and that

the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is correct. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as

follows:

1. Mr. Bowhall’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 2) is GRANTED.

2. Mr. Bowhall’s objection (Doc. # 6) is OVERRULED.

1

 Mr. Bowhall has filed eight other civil actions in this court. See Bowhall v. Johnson & Johnson,

No. 2:10cv601-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. Office of James M. Deimen, 2:10cv604-WKW (July

14, 2010); Bowhall v. Howell High Sch. Bd. of Educ., No. 2:10cv605-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v.

Viacom, Inc., 2:10cv606-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. Dep’t of Defense, No. 2:10cv607-WKW

(July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. NBC, Inc., 2:10cv608-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. Obama, No.

2:10cv609-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. NAACP Beverly Hills, No. 2:10cv679-WKW (Aug. 10,

2010).

Case 2:10-cv-00603-WKW-TFM Document 7 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 2
3. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. # 5) is ADOPTED.

4. Mr. Bowhall’s claims against Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice

prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii).

An appropriate final judgment will be entered.

DONE this 15th day of November, 2010.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 2:10-cv-00603-WKW-TFM Document 7 Filed 11/15/10 Page 2 of 2