Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00115/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00115-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODNEI FRAZIER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0115 MCE PAN P

vs.

DR. JOHN KOFOED, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed May 11, 2005, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return

to the court, within ninety days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant

William Oh. On August 25, 2005, plaintiff was granted until October 15, 2005 in which to

accomplish service of process on defendant William Oh. That date has passed and plaintiff has

not responded in any way to the court’s order concerning defendant Oh.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant

William Oh be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 4(m).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

Case 2:04-cv-00115-MCE -PAN Document 63 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 16, 2006.

/001; fraz0115.fus

Case 2:04-cv-00115-MCE -PAN Document 63 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 2