Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02665/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02665-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO A. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2665 EFB P

vs.

J. W. HAVILAND, et al., ORDER

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42

U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff’s consent. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

By order filed February 25, 2010, the court found that plaintiff had stated sufficient

charging allegations against defendants Rosario, Palwick and Peel and informed plaintiff he

could proceed against those defendants only or file an amended complaint that also states a claim

against defendants Haviland, Traquina, Sumner, Huffman, or Brimhall. The court also informed

plaintiff that the court would consider his decision to proceed only as to defendants Rosario,

Palwick and Peel as consent to the dismissal of the other named defendants. On March 5, 2010,

plaintiff returned documents for service against defendants Rosario, Palwick and Peel. 

Case 2:09-cv-02665-GEB-EFB Document 10 Filed 03/18/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against defendants

Haviland, Traquina, Sumner, Huffman, and Brimhall are dismissed without prejudice. 

Dated: March 18, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02665-GEB-EFB Document 10 Filed 03/18/10 Page 2 of 2