Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00938/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00938-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 02:437 Federal Election Commission

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE SALO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0938 WBS KJM PS

vs.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Presently calendared for hearing on January 17, 2007 is defendant’s motion to dismiss. No

opposition to the motion to dismiss has been filed. 

Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party

will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to

the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may

be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.”

Case 2:06-cv-00938-WBS -KJM Document 48 Filed 01/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of January 17, 2007 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s

motion to dismiss is continued to February 14, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than

January 31, 2007. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a

statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: January 4, 2007.

006

salo2.nop

Case 2:06-cv-00938-WBS -KJM Document 48 Filed 01/05/07 Page 2 of 2