Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01403/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01403-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUGENE E. ANDREYEV,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALEXANDER A. TURCOTTE., et al.,

Defendants.

2:23-cv-1403-CKD (PS)

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ consent, this matter is before the undersigned for all purposes 

including trial and entry of judgment. (See ECF No. 16.) Defendants have answered the 

complaint. (ECF No. 19.) Within 30 days from the date of this order, if they have not already 

done so, the parties shall meet, in person or by telephone, as required by Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 26. Within 10 days after the parties’ Rule 26 discussion, the parties shall file a Joint 

Status Report1 and any optional request for hearing before the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of 

entry of a pretrial scheduling order. The joint status report shall address the relevant portions of 

Local Rule 240(a).

////

////

1 If the parties are unable to file a joint status report, they may file separate status reports.

Case 2:23-cv-01403-CKD Document 20 Filed 12/04/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Within 30 days from the date of this order, the parties shall meet, in person or by 

telephone, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.

2. Within 10 days after the parties’ Rule 26 discussion, the parties shall file a joint status 

report and request for hearing before the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of entry of a pretrial 

scheduling order. The report shall address the following matters:

a. Service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and their scheduling;

f. The report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 outlining the 

proposed discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut−off dates for discovery 

and law and motion, and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;

h. Special procedures, if any;

i. Estimated trial time;

j. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the

simplicity or complexity of the proceedings;

k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including bankruptcy;

l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled;

m. The parties’ positions with respect to Voluntary Dispute Resolution (VDRP) 

under Local Rule 271(d); and

n. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this 

matter.

Dated: December 4, 2024

8, andr23cv1403.isc

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:23-cv-01403-CKD Document 20 Filed 12/04/24 Page 2 of 2