Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06508/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06508-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO MARQUEZ, CV-F-03-6508 OWW WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Petitioner, 

vs. [Doc. 22]

SCOTT P. RAWERS, Warden, 

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 26, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. These

findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. After receiving an

extension of time, Petitioner filed objections on July 20, 2006. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a de novo

review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983). th

 Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

Case 1:03-cv-06508-OWW -WMW Document 27 Filed 08/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

May 26, 2006, are a adopted in full;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this case. IT

IS SO ORDERED.

Emm0d6Dated: August 6, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06508-OWW -WMW Document 27 Filed 08/08/06 Page 2 of 2