Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-00243/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-00243-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

05988.00002/6586670.1 28 Case No. 5:15-CV-00243-NC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

HOTCHALK’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT 

Karin Kramer (SBN: 87346) 

karinkramer@quinnemanuel.com 

John Didday (SBN: 295332) 

johndidday@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Evette D. Pennypacker (SBN: 203515) 

evettepennypacker@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 

Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 

Telephone: (650) 801-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 

Attorneys for Defendant HotChalk, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

SHEILA JACKSON AND ALYSIA 

SILVERS, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

HOTCHALK, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

Defendant. 

 Case No. 5:15-CV-00243-NC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR HOTCHALK’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT 

Case 5:15-cv-00243-NC Document 25 Filed 03/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 5:15-CV-00243-NC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

HOTCHALK’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HOTCHALK, INC.’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2 Plaintiffs Sheila Jackson and Alysia Silvers 

and Defendant HotChalk, Inc. (“HotChalk”) filed a Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule for 

HotChalk’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint. 

Having considered the stipulation, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby ORDERS 

as follows: 

1. Plaintiffs shall have until April 6, 2015 to file their opposition to HotChalk’s Motion to 

Dismiss the Complaint. 

2. HotChalk shall have until April 15, 2015 to file its reply in support of its Motion to 

Dismiss the Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________ _______________________________________ 

 Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 5:15-cv-00243-NC Document 25 Filed 03/18/15 Page 2 of 2