Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506-45/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: BRIEFING & HEARING SCHEDULE 

C-99-2506-SI

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (State Bar # 060359) 

ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com 

Caroline N. Mitchell (State Bar # 143124) 

cnmitchell@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY 

555 California Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 626-3939 

Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Theresa M. Traber (State Bar # 116305) 

tmt@tvlegal.com 

TRABER & VOORHEES 

128 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 204 

Pasadena, California 91103 

Telephone: (626) 585-9611 

Facsimile: (626) 577-7079 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LARRY BOWOTO, et. al. 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CHEVRON CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. C-99-2506-SI 

PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND 

HEARING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE TO EIGHTH AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

 

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1302 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1304 Filed 11/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: BRIEFING & HEARING SCHEDULE 

C-99-2506-SI

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Eighth Amended Complaint on September 21, 2006; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Defendants’ response 

to the Eighth Amended Complaint was due October 10, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs agreed to an extension of time for Defendants to file a response 

through October 27, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss and a Motion to Strike Portions of 

Eighth Amended Complaint on October 27, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Defendants have agreed to an extension of time for Plaintiffs to file 

oppositions to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Portions of the Eighth 

Amended Complaint; 

 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: 

1. The hearing for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Portions of 

Eighth Amended Complaint will be set for February 2, 2007. 

2. Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike shall 

be filed no later than December 22, 2006. 

3. Defendants’ Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike shall be filed 

no later than January 17, 2007. 

DATED: November 1, 2006 JONES DAY 

By: /S/ Robert A. Mittelstaedt 

Robert A. Mittelstaedt 

Attorneys for Defendants 

DATED: November 1, 2006 HADSELL & STORMER 

By: /S/ Lauren Teukolsky 

Lauren Teukolsky 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November ___, 2006 By: 

 The Hon. Susan Illston 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1302 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1304 Filed 11/02/06 Page 2 of 2