Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-16-05212/USCOURTS-caDC-16-05212-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 16-5212 September Term, 2016

1:16-cv-01120-UNA

Filed On: December 1, 2016

Christopher Scott Barksdale,

Appellant

v.

United States of America, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Srinivasan and Wilkins, Circuit Judges,

and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed.

R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed June 15 and

August 11, 2016 be affirmed. The court correctly held that district courts lack authority

to review decisions of other district courts, and appellant failed to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted concerning the matters discussed in his complaint. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the request for “a separate Injunction order” and

damages contained in appellant’s brief be denied. Appellant has not shown any

grounds for an award of such relief by this court.

USCA Case #16-5212 Document #1648674 Filed: 12/01/2016 Page 1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 16-5212 September Term, 2016

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Ken Meadows 

Deputy Clerk

2

USCA Case #16-5212 Document #1648674 Filed: 12/01/2016 Page 2 of 2