Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00247/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00247-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

DLA PIPER US LLP 

EAST PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- 

PA\10542662.1 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND EMERGENCY REQUEST 

FOR ORDER IN ACCORDANCE THEREWITH; CASE NO. C 06-07342 RMW 

WILLIAM J. FRIMEL (Bar No. 160287) 

bill.frimel@dlapiper.com 

MARGARET A. CRAWFORD (Bar No. 238205) 

maggie.crawford@dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER US LLP 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2215 

Tel: 650.833.2000 

Fax: 650.833.2001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DAVANZIA, S.L. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

DAVANZIA, S.L., a Spanish corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LASERSCOPE, INC., a California 

corporation, and AMERICAN MEDICAL 

SYSTEMS, INC., a Minnesota corporation 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 07-00247 JF 

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF 

TRIAL DATE AND EMERGENCY REQUEST 

FOR ORDER IN ACCORDANCE 

THEREWITH 

It is hereby stipulated, by and between the parties to this action, through their respective 

counsel of record, and pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as follows: 

WHEREAS, the trial in this matter is currently set for May 9, 2008; 

WHEREAS, there are currently a large number of discovery disputes outstanding in this 

matter; 

WHEREAS, though the parties are meeting and conferring on the above-described 

discovery disputes in an attempt to limit motion practice, they realistically anticipate that several 

of those disputes will require the filing of motions by Davanzia, and Magistrate Judge Lloyd’s 

intervention, in order to be resolved; 

WHEREAS, Davanzia will be filing a motion for leave to amend its complaint; 

**E-filed 3/19/08**

Case 5:07-cv-00247-JF Document 149 Filed 03/19/08 Page 1 of 3
DLA PIPER US LLP 

EAST PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- 

PA\10542662.1 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND EMERGENCY REQUEST 

FOR ORDER IN ACCORDANCE THEREWITH; CASE NO. C 06-07342 RMW 

WHEREAS, issues have developed with the timing of the above-described motions: 

Davanzia is concerned that without a continuance the motions will need to be accompanied by 

motions to shorten time, and heard on shortened time, in order to be ruled on, and complied with, 

before the current trial date, and Laserscope is concerned that the motions cannot appropriately 

and fairly be briefed and considered on those shortened schedules; 

WHEREAS, efforts by the parties to settle this matter will be facilitated by the eventual 

receipt of the Court’s order on Davanzia’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed on 

January 10, 2008 and argued on February 15, 2008, and Laserscope’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment, filed on February 29, 2008 and to be argued on April 4, 2008, and the Court’s 

consideration of Davanzia’s anticipated motion to amend the complaint. 

WHEREAS, the parties have a discovery motion pending in the District Court of 

Minnesota; 

WHEREAS, the parties have a motion for a protective order pending before Magistrate 

Judge Lloyd in this Court; 

WHEREAS, there are currently two outstanding third party subpoenas to which the third 

parties have not timely replied, and which therefore necessitate further efforts by the parties to 

obtain compliance therewith, including possible additional motion practice; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that without a continuance of a minimum of sixty (60) 

calendar days there may not be adequate time for the above-referenced issues in this case to be 

adequately and timely addressed, or for the parties to prepare for trial in light of the decisions 

issued with respect to pending motions and motions still to be filed; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the current May 9, 2008 trial date in this matter, and 

all dates related thereto as referenced in Judge Fogel’s Standing Order Re Pretrial Preparation, 

should be vacated. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that any new trial date in this matter should be set a 

minimum of sixty (60) calendar days from May 9, 2008. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that, rather than immediately setting an alternative trial 

date, it would be preferable if the Court would set a Case Management Conference for May 2, 

Case 5:07-cv-00247-JF Document 149 Filed 03/19/08 Page 2 of 3
DLA PIPER US LLP 

EAST PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3- 

PA\10542662.1 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND EMERGENCY REQUEST 

FOR ORDER IN ACCORDANCE THEREWITH; CASE NO. C 06-07342 RMW 

2008 (when motions are likely to be scheduled for hearing), or any date thereafter that is 

convenient for the Court, during which conference the parties and the Court can discuss, and the 

Court can set, a new trial date. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: March 18, 2008 

 DLA PIPER US LLP 

By /s/ William J. Frimel 

WILLIAM J. FRIMEL 

MARGARET A. CRAWFORD 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PACKETEER, INC. 

Dated: March 18, 2008 OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN 

LLP 

By /s. Gary Hansen 

GARY HANSEN 

HEATHER N. HOECKE 

VERNON H. GRANNEMAN 

DIANNE L. SWEENEY 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LASERSCOPE, INC. AND AMERICAN 

MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the foregoing stipulation is approved and adopted as an 

order of this court. 

DATED: _____________, 2008 

 JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL, 

 United States District Judge 

3/19/08

Case 5:07-cv-00247-JF Document 149 Filed 03/19/08 Page 3 of 3