Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01802/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01802-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Garrick Harrington is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for stay of the service order pending a 

ruling on the objections to the Findings and Recommendation issued January 7, 2014. 

On January 7, 2014, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that 

Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim against Defendants Bautista and Blaylock for deliberate 

indifference to Plaintiff’s safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment. However, Plaintiff failed to 

state any other cognizable claims. Because Plaintiff been previously granted leave to amend, further 

amendment was not warranted, and a recommendation was issued that the action proceed only on the 

cognizable claims and all other claims and defendants be dismissed from the action. On this same 

date, the Court also issued a separate order directing Plaintiff to complete the necessary service 

documents. (ECF Nos. 21, 22.) 

GARRICK HARRINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

v.

J. BAUTISTA, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01802-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

STAY AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY 

DAYS TO COMPLETION AND RETURN OF THE 

NECESSARY SERVICE DOCUMENTS

[ECF No. 29] 

Case 1:10-cv-01802-LJO-SAB Document 30 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On March 12, 2014, Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation issued 

January 7, 2014. On April 1, 2014, the Findings and Recommendation was adopted in full by the 

assigned district judge. 

Because the Findings and Recommendation has been adopted in full, Plaintiff’s motion for stay 

of the action pending resolution of such recommendation is MOOT. In the interest of justice and 

based on a showing of good cause, the Court will grant Plaintiff thirty (30) days from the date of 

service of this order to complete and submit the necessary service documents in compliance with the 

Court’s January 7, 2014, service order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 4, 2014 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01802-LJO-SAB Document 30 Filed 04/04/14 Page 2 of 2