Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01393/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01393-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE 

ORDER CONCERNING ORACLE SOURCE CODE 

CASE NO. 16-CV-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

 Christopher S. Yates (SBN 161273) 

 Christopher B. Campbell (SBN 254776) 

 Brittany N. Lovejoy (SBN 286813) 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111-6538 

Telephone: 415.391.0600 

Facsimile: 415.395.8095 

Email: chris.yates@lw.com

 christopher.campbell@lw.com

 brittany.lovejoy@lw.com

ORACLE CORPORATION 

 Dorian Daley (SBN 129049) 

 Deborah K. Miller (SBN 95527) 

500 Oracle Parkway 

M/S 5op7 

Redwood City, CA 94065 

Telephone: 650.506.4846 

Facsimile: 650.506.7114 

Email dorian.daley@oracle.com deborah.miller@oracle.com

ORACLE CORPORATION 

 Jeffrey S. Ross (SBN 138172) 

10 Van de Graaff Drive 

Burlington, MA 01803 

Telephone: 781.744.0449 

Facsimile: 781.238.6273 

Email: jeff.ross@oracle.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Oracle America, Inc., and Oracle 

International Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; ORACLE INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, a California corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 

1–50, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-01393-JST 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED 

SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE 

ORDER CONCERNING ORACLE 

SOURCE CODE 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 341 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 7
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 1 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE 

ORDER CONCERNING ORACLE SOURCE CODE 

CASE NO. 16-CV-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the Court entered a Protective Order on August 16, 2016, Dkt 76 

(“Protective Order”). 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc., and Oracle International Corporation 

(together, “Oracle”) intend to produce source code for certain of their software at issue in this 

case (the “Oracle source code”). 

WHEREAS, Oracle considers the Oracle source code to be among the most highly 

confidential and sensitive assets of the company. 

WHEREAS, Oracle and Defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. (“HPE”) stipulate 

and agree, and ask the Court to order, that the following protocols will apply to HPE’s access to 

and use of the Oracle source code produced by Oracle following entry of this Supplemental 

Protective Order, in a production designated “Confidential Oracle Source Code Production,” in 

addition to applicable restrictions in the Protective Order: 

A. Source Code Protocols 

1. The following protocols shall apply to Oracle’s production of Oracle 

source code, and HPE’s access to and use of the Oracle source code for purposes of this case: 

a. Oracle shall produce source code electronically and in text searchable 

form, which HPE will load onto secured and password-protected 

computers and store in a secure, locked physical location, or any other 

location mutually agreed upon by the parties; 

b. HPE may show Oracle source code to the individuals described in

paragraphs E.1.b, E.1.c, E.1.d, E.1.e, E.1.f, E.1.g, E.1.h, E.1.j of the 

Protective Order, and jurors. Other than individuals described in 

paragraphs E.1.d and E.1.e and jurors, all such individuals receiving 

Oracle source code must first sign Exhibit A of this Supplemental 

Protective Order. 

1. For avoidance of doubt, the signature of one lead attorney for 

outside counsel of record Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher on Exhibit A 

of this Supplemental Protective Order shall represent the 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 341 Filed 09/20/17 Page 2 of 7
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 2 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE 

ORDER CONCERNING ORACLE SOURCE CODE 

CASE NO. 16-CV-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

compliance of all of the associated attorneys, paralegals, and other 

professional personnel (including support staff) who are directly 

assisting such counsel in the preparation of this action for trial or 

other proceedings herein, are under the supervision or control of 

such counsel, and who have been advised by such counsel of their 

obligations hereunder. 

c. HPE and its experts and consultants will store any hard copy media 

containing Oracle source code in secured, locked rooms; 

d. Any computers HPE and its experts and consultants use to access Oracle 

source code will be secured and password-protected and stored in a secure, 

locked physical location when not in use or in the physical possession of 

an authorized custodian; 

e. The computers referred to in paragraphs (a) and (d) will not have internet 

access or network access to other computers during the time the computers 

are used to access the Oracle source code, except individuals described in 

sections E.1.b and E.1.c of the Protective Order can access and/or 

exchange work-product containing portions of Oracle Source Code on 

computers that have network access provided that normal and ordinary 

procedures for protecting the network from unauthorized access are in 

place during the access and/storage of such work product; 

f. The computers referred to in paragraphs (a) and (d) will be fully scanned 

by up-to-date antivirus software or similar functionality, before Oracle 

source code is loaded onto them; 

g. No Oracle source code will be loaded onto the computers referred to in 

paragraphs (a) and (d) until all detected potential malware affecting 

unauthorized access is removed; 

h. No input/output or storage device (USB, memory stick, thumb drive, 

optical disk drive, or similar) may be connected to the computers referred 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 341 Filed 09/20/17 Page 3 of 7
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 3 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE 

ORDER CONCERNING ORACLE SOURCE CODE 

CASE NO. 16-CV-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to in paragraphs (a) and (d) while accessing Oracle source code, except 

that an encrypted hard drive may be used to store, copy, analyze, and/or 

allow access Oracle source code between and/or by persons described 

sections E.1.b and E.1.c of the Protective Order. 

i. HPE and its experts and consultants may not copy, remove or transfer any 

portion of the Oracle source code except for (1) printouts of reasonable 

portions of the Source Code in accordance with the provisions of Section 

A(1)(j-k) of this Supplemental Protective Order; and (2) such other things 

to which the parties may agree or that the Judge may order; 

j. At the request of the receiving party, Oracle shall within five (5) business 

days provide one (1) hard copy printout of the specific lines, pages, or 

files of the Source Code that HPE believes in good faith are necessary to 

understand a relevant feature of the Oracle software produced to HPE 

pursuant to this Supplemental Protective order, which shall not exceed 10 

consecutive printed pages (8.5 by 11 inches) from any one file or 100 

printed pages total without a showing of good cause by HPE. If Oracle 

objects in any manner to the production of the requested source code (e.g., 

the request is too voluminous or Oracle is not otherwise able to reasonably 

comply with the request), it shall state its objection within five (5) 

business days of HPE’s request. In the event of a dispute, the parties will 

meet and confer within five (5) business days of the objection being raised 

and if they cannot resolve it the parties will raise it with the Judge. 

k. Hard copy printouts of Source Code shall be provided on Bates numbered 

and watermarked or colored paper clearly labeled CONFIDENTIAL 

SOURCE CODE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY INFORMATION on each 

page. HPE’s outside litigation counsel and/or qualified individuals listed 

in Section A(1)(a) of this Supplemental Protective Order will maintain the 

printouts in a secure locked area. HPE may also temporarily keep the 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 341 Filed 09/20/17 Page 4 of 7
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 4 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE 

ORDER CONCERNING ORACLE SOURCE CODE 

CASE NO. 16-CV-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

printouts at: (1) the relevant Courthouse for any proceeding(s) relating to 

the Source Code, for the dates associated with the proceeding(s); (2) the 

sites where any deposition(s) relating to the Source Code are taken, for the 

dates associated with the deposition(s); and (3) any intermediate location 

reasonably necessary to transport the printouts (e.g., a hotel prior to a 

Court proceeding or deposition), provided that the Source Code shall be 

maintained in a secure, locked physical location when not in use or in the 

physical possession of an authorized custodian. HPE shall exercise due 

care in maintaining the security of the printouts at these temporary 

locations. No further hard copies of such Source Code shall be made and 

the Source Code shall not be transferred into any electronic format or onto 

any electronic media except that: 

1. HPE is permitted to make up to three (3) additional hard copies for 

use at a deposition. One hard copy of the source code may be 

marked as an exhibit for or otherwise identified at the deposition, 

and then maintained by counsel for the party presenting the exhibit 

during the deposition in a secure, locked physical location. Copies 

of Source Code that are so identified during deposition shall not be 

provided to the court reporter or attached to deposition transcripts; 

rather, the deposition record will identify the exhibit by its 

production numbers. Other than the one copy marked or identified 

by counsel during the deposition, which may be retained only in a 

secure, locked physical location, all other copies shall be destroyed 

immediately after the deposition is concluded. To the extent 

portions of Source Code are quoted or paraphrased in the 

deposition transcript, either (1) the entire transcript will be stamped 

and treated as CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE-ATTORNEYS' 

EYES ONLY INFORMATION; or (2) those pages containing 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 341 Filed 09/20/17 Page 5 of 7
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 5 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE 

ORDER CONCERNING ORACLE SOURCE CODE 

CASE NO. 16-CV-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

quoted or paraphrased Source Code will be separately stamped and 

treated as CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE ATTORNEYS' 

EYES ONLY INFORMATION. 

2. HPE is permitted to make up to five (5) additional hard copies for 

inclusion in expert reports or in connection with a hearing or trial, 

and of only the specific pages directly relevant to and necessary for 

deciding the issue for which the portions of the Source Code are 

being filed or offered. To the extent portions of Source Code are 

quoted or paraphrased in an expert report, either (1) the entire 

document will be stamped and treated as CONFIDENTIAL 

SOURCE CODE-ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY INFORMATION; 

or (2) those pages containing quoted or paraphrased Source Code

will be separately stamped and treated as CONFIDENTIAL 

SOURCE CODE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY INFORMATION. 

3. Oracle shall, on request, make a searchable electronic copy of the 

Source Code available on a stand-alone computer during 

depositions of Oracle fact witnesses who would otherwise be 

permitted access to such Source Code. HPE shall make such 

request at least five (5) business days before the deposition if the 

deposition will take place at the secure location where the Source 

Code computer at issue is stored, and at least ten (10) business 

days before the deposition for depositions held elsewhere. 

l. The protocols do not apply to copyright office deposits. 

m. HPE and its experts and consultants must securely delete the Oracle 

source code once their analysis is complete and before the computers are 

reconnected to the network, internet, or any input/output or storage device, 

except that expert work product based on the Oracle source code need not 

be deleted until the litigation is terminated (as defined in the Protective 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 341 Filed 09/20/17 Page 6 of 7
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 6 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE 

ORDER CONCERNING ORACLE SOURCE CODE 

CASE NO. 16-CV-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order). Outside counsel for HPE may retain copies of work product 

containing Oracle source code pursuant to their existing document 

retention policies. However, work product containing or reflecting the 

Oracle source code shall be stored on a computer that complies with the 

above protocols. 

n. HPE reserves the right pursuant to paragraph D.6 of the Protective Order 

to challenge Oracle’s confidentiality designations for any Oracle source 

code. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH THE PARTIES’ COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: September 12, 2017 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

By: /s/ Christopher S. Yates 

Christopher S. Yates 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Oracle America, Inc. and 

Oracle International Corporation 

Dated: September 12, 2017 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By: /s/ Samuel G. Liversidge 

Samuel G. Liversidge 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: By: 

 THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

September 20, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 341 Filed 09/20/17 Page 7 of 7