Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-3_15-cv-00370/USCOURTS-ared-3_15-cv-00370-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

JONESBORO DIVISION

LARRY LENN MOORE, JR. PLAINTIFF

V. 3:15CV00370 KGB/JTR

FLECIA ANN KING, Kitchen Supervisor,

Craighead County Detention Center, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER 

Plaintiff, LarryLenn Moore, Jr., is confined in the CraigheadCountyDetention

Center. He has filed a pro se § 1983 action alleging that Defendants violated his

constitutional rights. 

The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires federal courts to screen prisoner

complaints seeking relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or a portion thereof if the

prisoner has raised claims that: (a) are legally frivolous or malicious; (b) fail to state

a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (c) seek monetary relief from a

defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). When making this

determination, a court must accept the truth of the factual allegations contained in the

complaint, and it may consider the documents attached to the complaint. Ashcroft v.

-1-

Case 3:15-cv-00370-JTR Document 5 Filed 12/01/15 Page 1 of 3
Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); Reynolds v. Dormire, 636 F.3d 976, 979 (8th Cir.

2011).

Plaintiff alleges that his unspecified constitutional rights were violated when

he ended a consensualsexual relationship with Defendant Flecia Ann King. Plaintiff

has named Jail Administrator Hall and Sheriff Boyd as Defendants, but he has not

explained how either of them violated his constitutional rights.

The Court needs further information to complete § 1915A screening. Thus,

Plaintiff must file, within thirty days of the entry of this Order, an Amended

Complaint clarifying: (1) whether Defendant King coerced him into engaging in a

sexual relationship, and if so, how she coerced him; (2) how Defendant King

otherwise violated his constitutional rights; (3) how Defendant Hall personally

violated Plaintiff's constitutional rights; and (4) how Defendant Boyd personally

violated Plaintiff's constitutional rights. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiff must file, on or before

January 4, 2016, an Amended Complaint containing the specified information. If

he does not timely and properly do so, this case will be dismissed, without prejudice,

pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). 

-2-

Case 3:15-cv-00370-JTR Document 5 Filed 12/01/15 Page 2 of 3
IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of December, 2015.

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-3-

Case 3:15-cv-00370-JTR Document 5 Filed 12/01/15 Page 3 of 3