Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-01812/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-01812-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

-1- STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR WEST TO REPLY OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO NORTHSTAR’S THIRD AMENDED 

ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM Case No. C 07-1812 JF

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

Edward Vincent King, Jr. (SBN 085726) 

KING & KELLEHER, LLP 

20 California Street, 7th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 781-2888 

Facsimile: (415) 781-3011 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TRENT WEST 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 Defendant Northstar Diamond, Inc. (“Northstar”), by and through its undersigned 

counsel of record, and Plaintiff Trent West (“West”), by and through his undersigned counsel of 

record, have agreed and stipulated under Civil L.R. 6-1(a) to extend the time for West to reply or 

otherwise respond to Northstar’s Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim by two weeks from 

January 17, 2008 to January 31, 2008. West’s counsel is filing this stipulation with the Court 

after having received the consent and agreement of Northstar’s counsel to its form and content. 

TRENT WEST, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JEWELRY INNOVATIONS, INC., 

TOSYALI INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

(dba BENCHMARK), NORTHSTAR 

DIAMOND, INC. (dba TUNGSTEN 

MAGNUM), and A JAMAIS DESIGNS, 

INC. (dba INFINITY RINGS), and 

CROWN RINGS, INC., 

 

 Defendants. 

___________________________________

And Related Cross-Actions 

Case No. C 07-1812 JF 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR 

WEST TO REPLY OR OTHERWISE 

RESPOND TO NORTHSTAR’S THIRD 

AMENDED ANSWER AND 

COUNTERCLAIM 

**E-filed 1/24/08**

Case 5:07-cv-01812-EJD Document 137 Filed 01/24/08 Page 1 of 2
 -2- STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR WEST TO REPLY OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO NORTHSTAR’S THIRD AMENDED 

ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM Case No. C 07-1812 JF

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 Accordingly, Northstar and West request that the Court issue an Order, for good cause 

shown, that the time for West to reply or otherwise respond to Northstar’s Third Amended 

Answer and Counterclaim be extended to January 31, 2008. 

JONES WALDO HOLBROOK & 

MCDONOUGH 

By: /s/Brett D. Ekins_____

 Brett D. Ekins 

Attorneys for Defendants Jewelry Innovations, 

Inc., Tosyali International, Inc. (dba 

Benchmark), and Northstar Diamond, Inc. (dba 

Tungsten Magnum) 

Date: January 16, 2007 

KING & KELLEHER 

By: /s/Edward Vincent King, Jr. 

 Edward Vincent King, Jr. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Trent West 

Date: January 16, 2007 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January ____, 2008 

 

 Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

 Judge, U.S. Northern District Court 

24

Case 5:07-cv-01812-EJD Document 137 Filed 01/24/08 Page 2 of 2