Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01339/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01339-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1339

ALEXANDER H. BRADLEY, JR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JON OZMIT; MARK 

PRICE, Major; A.J. PADULA,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (3:08-cv-02510-JFA)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander H. Bradley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, 

Thomas Lowndes Pope, Heath McAlvin Stewart, III, RILEY, POPE & 

LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-1339 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/29/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Alexander H. Bradley, Jr., appeals the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants in 

his complaint alleging that he was terminated from his 

employment in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (2006), and 

South Carolina law. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Bradley v. South Carolina Dep’t of 

Corr., No. 3:08-cv-02510-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 2010). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-1339 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/29/2010 Pg: 2 of 2