Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00167/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00167-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 03-00167 MJJ (JL) 

[APPEARANCES LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGES] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff 

v. 

LEXAR MEDIA, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

STIPULATION REGARDING CASE 

SCHEDULE; SUPPORTING 

DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 105 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 1 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 106 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 03-00167 MJJ (JL) 

 The parties have met and conferred and agree that a short extension of time will be needed 

to complete fact and expert discovery and to prepare for mediation, dispositive motions, and trial. 

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate that, with the Court’s permission, the current schedule 

set forth in the February 10, 2006 Order be extended as follows. The parties further agree that the 

schedule changes requested here should not impact any dates set or requested in related case 

number C-0205273 MJJ, and will not be used to argue for any changes in the schedule in that 

case. It is noted that a Stipulation and Proposed Order regarding the case schedule was filed on 

April 14, 2006 by the parties but has not been entered by the Court. Those dates are included in 

the table below for the Court’s reference. 

Event February 10, 2006 

Scheduling Order 

April 14 Stipulation New Proposed Date 

Complete fact 

discovery 

April 14, 2006 May 19, 2006 June 2, 20061

Burden of proof 

expert reports 

April 28, 2006 June 9, 2006 June 21, 2006 

Rebuttal expert 

reports 

May 18, 2006 June 30, 2006 July 19, 2006 

Complete Expert 

Discovery 

June 2, 2006 July 21, 2006 August 4, 2006 

Last day to file 

dispositive motions 

June 22, 2006 August 10, 2006 August 10, 2006 

Opposition briefs 

due 

July 6, 2006 August 25, 2006 August 25, 2006 

Reply briefs due July 13, 2006 September 1, 2006 September 1, 2006 

Hearing on 

dispositive motions 

July 28, 2006, or as 

soon thereafter as is 

convenient for the 

Court and the parties 

To be determined 

by the Court 

November 7, 2006 

Mediation take 

place 

August 28, 2006 One or before 

September 30, 2006 

On or before 

September 30, 2006 

New claim terms 

designated by 

August 28, 2006 September 30, 2006 September 30, 2006 

By his signature below, counsel for Toshiba attests under penalty of perjury that counsel 

for the parties concur in the filing of this Stipulation. 

 

1

 This date only applies to completing discovery timely noticed or served in compliance with the 

previously-agreed May 19, 2006 fact discovery cutoff. 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 105 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 2 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 106 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 03-00167 MJJ (JL) 

Dated: May 19, 2006 

 /s/ Steven Cherensky 

Matthew D. Powers (Bar No. 104795) 

matthew.powers@weil.com 

Steven Cherensky (Bar No. 168275) 

steven.cherensky@weil.com 

Perry R. Clark (Bar No. 197101) 

perry.clark@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Silicon Valley Office 

201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Telephone: (650) 802-3000 

Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 

Anita E. Kadala 

anita.kadala@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Houston Office 

700 Louisiana, Suite 1600 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 546-5000 

Facsimile: (713) 224-9511 

Attorneys for LEXAR MEDIA, INC. 

Dated: May 19, 2006 /s/ Carl Schlier 

Robert F. McCauley (Bar No. 162056) 

E-Mail: Robert.mccauley@finnegan.com

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

Stanford Research Park 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Arthur I. Neustadt 

E-Mail: aneustadt@oblon.com

Richard D. Kelly 

E-Mail: rkelly@oblon.com

Carl E. Schlier 

E-Mail: cschlier@oblon.com

OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & 

NEUSTADT, P.C. 

1940 Duke Street 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

Telephone: (703) 413-3000 

Facsimile: (703) 413-2220 

Attorneys for TOSHIBA CORPORATION 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 105 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 3 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 106 Filed 05/24/06 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 03-00167 MJJ (JL) 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF CARL E. SCHLIER 

 I, Carl E. Schlier, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in the State of Virginia, am admitted pro hac 

vice for this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and 

am with the law firm of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, attorneys of record for 

Toshiba Corporation. The matters referred to in this declaration are based on my personal 

knowledge and if called as a witness I could, and would, testify competently to those matters. 

2. The factual representations made above in the above Stipulation are true. The 

parties have been actively engaged in discovery and, in particular, the parties have been actively 

preparing for and taking depositions in the United States and in Japan for several months. In 

recent weeks, the parties have met and conferred and agreed that the schedule in this case should 

be extended, as requested above, to permit the orderly completion of fact and expert discovery 

and to prepare for mediation and any dispositive motion practice. 

3. The parties submitted a proposed order on April 14, 2006 proposing modifications 

to the Court’s February 10, 2006 Scheduling Order, but the proposed order has not been entered 

by the Court. The February 10, 2006 Scheduling Order modified the schedule set forth in the 

June 8, 2005 Scheduling Order. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on May 19, 2006 at 

Alexandria, Virginia. 

 /s/ 

 Carl E. Schlier 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 105 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 4 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 106 Filed 05/24/06 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 03-00167 MJJ (JL) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________ __________________________________________ 

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 105 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 5 of 5

5/24/2006

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 106 Filed 05/24/06 Page 5 of 5