Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00219/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00219-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case Nos. C 06 219 JF RS & C 06 926 JF RS

ORDER DIRECTING FILING OF AMENDED JOINT PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND

PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF SUBMITTED AFTER CONCLUSION OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING

(DPSAGOK)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Michael Angelo MORALES,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

James E. TILTON, Acting Secretary of the

California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation, and Robert L. Ayers Jr., Acting

Warden of San Quentin State Prison,

 Defendants.

Case Number C 06 219 JF RS

Case Number C 06 926 JF RS

DEATH-PENALTY CASE

ORDER DIRECTING FILING OF

AMENDED JOINT PRE-HEARING

CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND

PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF SUBMITTED

AFTER CONCLUSION OF

EVIDENTIARY HEARING

 In accordance with prior orders of the Court, the parties submitted to the Court under seal

for review in camera an amended joint pre-hearing conference statement with proposed

redactions. The Court has reviewed carefully the amended joint pre-hearing conference

statement and the proposed redactions and has balanced the competing interests of public access

to court records and the preservation of execution team members’ anonymity. The Court finds

and concludes that the proposed redactions are minimal in scope and are narrowly tailored to

protect execution team members’ anonymity. See Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Ct., 478 U.S.

1, 15 (1986).

Accordingly, and good cause therefor appearing, the parties shall e-file forthwith the

redacted amended joint pre-hearing conference statement. In addition, Plaintiff shall e-file

Case 3:06-cv-00219-RS Document 275 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case Nos. C 06 219 JF RS & C 06 926 JF RS

ORDER DIRECTING FILING OF AMENDED JOINT PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND

PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF SUBMITTED AFTER CONCLUSION OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING

(DPSAGOK)

forthwith his brief that he submitted after the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing with

redactions in accordance with those permitted in the amended joint pre-hearing conference

statement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 20, 2006 __________________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-00219-RS Document 275 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 2