Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00541/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00541-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

YVONNE ARCURE, KEVIN COOK, & 

JOSEPH FESSENDEN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES, 

DEBORAH MEEKER, JEFFREY 

BRADLEY, DOUGLAS LOEHNER, 

DAVID CORRAL, & MICHAEL FLORES,

Defendants.

1:13-cv-00541-LJO-BAM

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO 

PLAINTIFFS RE DEFENDANT SCOTT

GARDNER AND MARK RODRIQUEZ

TO PLAINTIFFS AND PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL:

Two originally named defendants, Scott Gardner and Mark Rodriguez, remain on the

Court’s docket, and no appearances have been made by these individuals. The Third Amended 

Complaint (Doc. 95) does not name either Scott Gardner or Mark Rodriguez. The Third

Amended Complaint, however, contains allegations against Scott Gardner. 

On or before January 30, 2015, Plaintiffs shall show cause in writing as to whether Scott 

Gardner and Mark Rodriguez should be removed from the Court’s docket as they are no longer 

Case 1:13-cv-00541-MJS Document 151 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

defendants in the Third Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff contends that either Scott Gardner or 

Mark Rodriguez remain as a defendant, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why Scott Gardner 

and/or Mark Rodriguez should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00541-MJS Document 151 Filed 01/23/15 Page 2 of 2