Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00362/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00362-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT R. RECINO,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNKNOWN,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00362-LJO-BAM (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING 

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 32)

Plaintiff Robert R. Recino (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff originally filed this 

matter in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, and it was transferred to 

this Court on March 6, 2015. 

On July 27, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 

Defendants Neubarth, Nair, Klarich, and Howden be dismissed from this action, for Plaintiff’s 

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted against them. (ECF No. 32.) The 

findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections 

must be filed within fourteen days after service of the order. (Id. at 6.) More than fourteen days 

have passed, and no objections were filed.

///

Case 1:15-cv-00362-LJO-BAM Document 34 Filed 08/23/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case and carefully reviewed the entire file. The Court finds that the 

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations dated July 27, 2016 (ECF No. 32) are 

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants Neubarth, Nair, Klarich, and Howden, are dismissed from this action 

for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted against them; and,

3. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, dated July 12, 2016

(ECF No. 30), against the two unknown correctional officer defendants for 

allegedly failing to intercede as Plaintiff was beaten by other inmates, and for 

delaying in obtaining medical treatment for him after the beating, in violation of 

the Eighth Amendment

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 23, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00362-LJO-BAM Document 34 Filed 08/23/16 Page 2 of 2