Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-05434/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-05434-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

ORDER Case No. C05-05434 MJJ (EDL) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOHN EARL CAMPBELL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER 

CORPORATION dba AMTRAK, JOE DEELY, 

and DOES 1-15, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C05-05434 MJJ (EDL) 

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION

 On May 31, 2007, Defendants filed a Request for Leave to File Motion for 

Reconsideration of Order Re Motion to Compel. On June 15, 2007, Plaintiff opposed that 

Request. After full consideration of the papers, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Request. 

 Under Civil Local Rule 7-9, any party may request reconsideration of an interlocutory 

order before the entry of a judgment adjudicating all of the claims and the rights and liabilities of 

all the parties in a case. See Civ. L.R. 7-9(b). The moving party must show that, at the time of 

the filing of the motion for leave, a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was 

presented to the Court before entry of the interlocutory order; that new material facts or a change 

of law occurred after the order was entered; or that there was “a manifest failure by the Court to 

consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments which were presented to the Court.” Id.

Case 4:05-cv-05434-CW Document 119 Filed 06/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

ORDER Case No. C05-05434 MJJ (EDL) 

Defendants have failed to make this showing. Accordingly, Defendants’ Request is DENIED. 

However, the request was not so egregious as to warrant sanctions, as requested by Plaintiff. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Date: June 29, 2007 _________________________________ 

 Elizabeth D. Laporte 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 4:05-cv-05434-CW Document 119 Filed 06/29/07 Page 2 of 2