Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00583/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00583-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,

Plaintiff, CIV. NO. S-05-0583 LKK GGH

vs.

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL ORDER

UTILITY DISTRICT, et al,

Defendants. 

 /

SMUD shall file no later than August 3, 2006, a statement concerning whether a

consultant associated with Huffman-Broadway or CH2M Hill testified in connection with CEC

proceedings, or submitted, or had submitted on their belief, reports, investigations, opinion

letters and the like in the CEC proceedings, or to other persons/entities participating in the CEC

proceedings, where such reports, etc., were prepared in whole or in part by a person(s) associated

with the above two consultant firms. That is, no distinction should be made whether the report,

etc., appears under Huffman-Broadway letterhead or SMUD letterhead, or counsel letterhead or

some other letterhead.

DATED: 7/28/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

 U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:ggh:035

frucon.smud

Case 2:05-cv-00583-LKK -GGH Document 236 Filed 07/28/06 Page 1 of 1