Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-05226/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-05226-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

Case No. 13-CV-05226-LHK 

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AND TO FILE 

STIPULATION AMENDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IN RE ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. PRIVACY 

LITIGATION 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 13-CV-05226-LHK

ORDER VACATING MOTION 

HEARING AND CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AND 

TO FILE STIPULATION AMENDING 

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motion for voluntary dismissal of putative class claims 

pursuant to settlement, see ECF No. 87, as well as Plaintiffs’ attendant administrative motion to 

seal, see ECF No. 86, and motion for approval of attorney’s fees, see ECF No. 97. The Court finds 

these matters suitable for decision without oral argument under Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and hereby 

VACATES the motion hearing and case management conference set for August 13, 2015, at 1:30 

p.m. 

Having reviewed the parties’ Settlement Agreement, the Court noticed a small error. The 

introductory paragraph to Part III.A of the Settlement Agreement says: “This Agreement shall be 

conditioned upon and shall be effective only upon the occurrence of all of the following events.” 

ECF No. 87-2 at 13. One of those “events,” Part III.A.1 then states, is that “Lead Plaintiffs’ 

Counsel shall move the Court on or before May 28, 2015 for an Order Granting Approval of the 

Voluntary Dismissal of Putative Class Claims, and such motion is granted by the Court.” Id.

Case 5:13-cv-05226-LHK Document 102 Filed 08/12/15 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 13-CV-05226-LHK 

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AND TO FILE 

STIPULATION AMENDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

(emphasis added). The problem is that even though Plaintiffs’ counsel anticipated filing the 

motion for approval of voluntary dismissal of putative class claims pursuant to settlement by May 

28, 2015, see ECF No. 79, Plaintiffs did not file their motion until June 9, 2015, see ECF No. 87. 

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file a stipulation amending Part 

III.A.1 of the Settlement Agreement to substitute “June 9, 2015” for “May 28, 2015.” The parties 

shall file their stipulation no later than August 13, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 12, 2015 _________________________________ 

 LUCY H. KOH 

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:13-cv-05226-LHK Document 102 Filed 08/12/15 Page 2 of 2