Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04181/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04181-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 

Arlene C. Helfrich, State Bar No. 096461 

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

Harvey E. Levine, Esq., State Bar No. 61880 

City Attorney City of Fremont 

3300 Capitol Avenue 

PO Box 5006 

Fremont, CA 94537-5006 

Telephone: (510) 284-4030 

Facsimile: (610) 284-4031 

Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF FREMONT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARK OTTOVICH, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY OF FREMONT, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: CV09-4181 MMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, defendant CITY OF FREMONT and 

plaintiff MARK OTTOVICH, by and through their attorneys of record, that the initial Case 

Management Conference be continued from its current date of April 30, 2010 to the date of May 7, 

2010 at 10:30 a.m., with the dates for submission of the joint Case Management Conference 

Statement and Rule 26 disclosures to be adjusted accordingly. Good cause exists for this continuance 

in that defendant’s counsel, Gregory Fox, has a motion for summary judgment set in Contra Costa 

County Superior Court for the morning of the April 30, 2010 that includes multiple parties in a 

different matter, Sanchez v City of Antioch.

 Said motion was specially set by the Contra Costa County Superior Court on its own motion. 

AND ORDER THEREON

Case 3:09-cv-04181-MMC Document 36 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 2
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: February 28, 2010 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

 By: /s/ 

Gregory M. Fox 

Arlene C. Helfrich 

Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF FREMONT 

Dated: February 22, 2010 

 By: /s/ 

Craig H. Mar 

Attorney for Plaintiff MARK OTTOVICH 

 ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

conformed signature (“/s/”) within this E-filed document. 

Dated: February 28, 2010 /s/ 

 Gregory M. Fox 

ORDER

 Good cause appearing, 

 THE STIPULATION IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________, 2010 

 __________________________________________ 

 Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

March 9

Case 3:09-cv-04181-MMC Document 36 Filed 03/09/10 Page 2 of 2