Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02706/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02706-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE GUADALUPE VILLANUEVA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2706 LKK EFB P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner, without counsel, seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 8, 2007, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for failure to

state a claim upon which relief could be granted, explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave

plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies and warned plaintiff

that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed for failure to state a claim. On May 1 and June 4, 2007, the court granted plaintiff 30-

day extensions of time.

The 30-day period since June 4, 2007, has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended

complaint.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to

state a claim upon which relief could be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Case 2:06-cv-02706-LKK -KJN Document 27 Filed 08/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: August 14, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-02706-LKK -KJN Document 27 Filed 08/14/07 Page 2 of 2