Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-00086/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-00086-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

IN RE FLASH MEMORY ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to All Actions. 

Case No: C 07-0086 SBA 

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE A RESPONSE TO INDIRECT 

PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION 

Docket 705, 714, 715 

Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs have filed a motion for leave to file a motion for 

reconsideration of the Court’s Order, filed March 31, 2010, denying their motion for class 

certification and related motions. Docket 707, 715. The Court directs Defendants to file a 

response to said motion. 

In addition, Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs have filed motions for leave to file recent 

decisions. Docket 705, 714. Leave of court is not required to submit a Statement of Recent 

Decision. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Defendants shall file their response to Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ motion for 

leave to file a motion for reconsideration by no later than May 19, 2010. Defendants’ response 

shall conform in all respects to Civil Local Rule 7-4. No reply brief may be filed. The matter 

will be deemed under submission as of the date Defendants’ response is due. 

2. Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs’ motions for leave to file recent decisions are 

DENIED as unnecessary. This Order terminates Docket 705 and 714. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 5, 2010 

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG 

United States District Judge 

 

Case 4:07-cv-00086-SBA Document 718 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 1