Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07454/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07454-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7454

HENRY W. MARTIN, JR.,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM R. BYARS; JOHN R. PATE; ARTHUR A. JORDAN; MCKENNDLY 

NEWTON; ROBERT E. WARD; JON OZMINT; DENNIS PATTERSON; 

DANIEL MURPHY; DAVID M. TATARSKY; LT. J. CARUJO; LT. J. 

CARTER; ROBERT ORR; LT. JAMES RUMP; CAPTAIN E. J. MILLER; 

DR. THOMAS BYNSE; LT. VARLEASE BLACK; CPL L. JENKINS; CPT 

MYECHA MILEY; M. HUDSON; S. SINGLATON, DHO; CPL. T. 

SIMPSON; MR. MCQUEEN; P. SMITH; A. HOLLMAN; HELEN FREEMAN; 

THOMAS SCOTT; CPT. E. JAMES; TANYA A. GEE; V. CLAIRE ALLEN; 

JOHN C. FEW; WAYNE C. MCCABE; JILL BEATTIE; JEANNETTE MACK; 

FRANCINE BAUCHMAN; PATTY BRITT POSEY; JAMES S. SLIGH, JR.; 

DR. ROWLAND; GREGORY S. LINE; CHARLOTTE SMITH; ELLEN 

GOODWIN; RUSSELL RUSH; JIM CROSBY; SUSAN BARDEN; VIRGINIA 

CROCKER; PAM SMITH; LAKETA DIKA; DEBORAH B. DURDEN,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(6:13-cv-03516-TMC-KFM)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 14-7454 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Sharp, 

GRIFFITH, SADLER & SHARP, PA, Beaufort, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7454 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Henry W. Martin, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing Martin’s claims against all but one 

Defendant without prejudice. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Martin seeks 

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 14-7454 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/21/2015 Pg: 3 of 3