Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07224/USCOURTS-ca4-19-07224-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7224

JAMES C. MCNEILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RENE SMITH-HARRIS; BIANCA PIRTLE; CHARLOTTE WILLIAMS; ERIK 

HOOKS; ELDRIDGE WALKER; JOHNNY HAWKINS; THOMAS MCCURDY; 

KENNETH LITTLE; BILLY O. COOPER; SGT. DAVID GILLIS; SGT. J. CURTIS 

JONES; CHICQUITA A. LUCAS; SGT. WILSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03010-D)

Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James C. McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7224 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/20/2019 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

James C. McNeill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2012) complaint.*

 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v. SmithHarris, No. 5:19-ct-03010-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The district court dismissed the complaint in part for failure to state a claim and in 

part without prejudice as to McNeill’s ability to assert in a habeas corpus petition his claims 

of due process violations in connection with disciplinary proceedings.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-7224 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/20/2019 Pg: 2 of 2