Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-3_13-cv-00712/USCOURTS-almd-3_13-cv-00712-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 540
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

PETER PRITCHETT, JR., #284 708, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-712-WHA 

) [WO]

POLICE OFFICER DEREK FARR, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On March 11, 2015, Plaintiff filed a pleading considered a Motion to Dismiss Defendant

Derek Farr from this cause of action. In support of his motion, Plaintiff states this individual was

incorrectly named as a party to the complaint. Upon review of the motion, the court concludes

that it should be granted.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that:

1. Plaintiff’s March 11, 2015, pleading, considered a Motion to Dismiss Defendant

Derek Farr (Doc. No. 32), be GRANTED;

2. Defendant Derek Far be DISMISSED with prejudice as a party to this complaint; and

3. This case with respect to the remaining defendant be referred back to the undersigned

for additional proceedings.

It is further 

ORDERED that on or before April 8, 2015, the parties may file an objection to the 

Recommendation. Any objection filed must clearly identify the findings in the Magistrate

Judge's Recommendation to which the parties object. Frivolous, conclusive or general

Case 3:13-cv-00712-WHA-GMB Document 39 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 2
objections will not be considered by the District Court. The parties are advised this

Recommendation is not a final order and, therefore, it is not appealable.

Failure to file a written objection to the proposed findings and recommendations in the

Magistrate Judge's report shall bar a party from a de novo determination by the District Court of

issues covered in the report and shall bar a party from attacking on appeal factual findings in the

report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain error or manifest

injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982). See Stein v. Reynolds Securities,

Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th

Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth

Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981.

Done, this 23 day of March 2015. rd

 /s/Terry F. Moorer 

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:13-cv-00712-WHA-GMB Document 39 Filed 03/23/15 Page 2 of 2