Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-00605/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-00605-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

{A060084.DOC/1} 96cv987, 1 06cv605 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LYONS PARTNERSHIP, L.P., 

a Texas limited partnership, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

NATIONAL DISCOUNT COSTUME CO., 

INC., a California corporation, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

-------------------------------------------------------- 

HIT ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

NATIONAL DISCOUNT COSTUME CO., 

INC., a California corporation, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Civil Nos. 96cv987 BTM (AJB) 

 06cv605 BTM (AJB) 

ORDER MODIFYING PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION ORDER AND ORDER 

UNSEALING DOCUMENTS 

WHEREAS on March 27, 2006, the Court entered a Temporary Restraining 

Order (the “TRO”) requiring seizure of certain of defendants’ business records; 

WHEREAS said records were then seized from defendant Costume Enterprises 

Inc. (“CEI”); 

WHEREAS on April 26, 2006 the Court vacated the TRO by issuing a 

“Preliminary Injunction Order and Order Unsealing Documents” (the “Preliminary Injunction”), 

Case 3:06-cv-00605-BTM-AJB Document 92 Filed 08/06/07 Page 1 of 2
 

{A060084.DOC/1} 96cv987, 2 06cv605 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Paragraph 4 of which provided that “Plaintiffs’ counsel shall not disclose the contents of the 

seized records to their clients or any third party except as reasonably required for the litigation of 

this case.”; 

WHEREAS CEI’s principal Huong Le has represented to the Court that CEI is 

defunct and that there are no plans for it to resume business operations; 

WHEREAS there is no longer any reason to prevent such records from being 

used in the investigation and litigation of other cases; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the text of Paragraph 4 of the Preliminary 

injunction is hereby deleted and replaced with the following language: “Plaintiffs’ counsel shall 

not disclose the seized records to their clients or any third party except as reasonably required for 

the litigation or investigation of this case or other cases and claims.” 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 3, 2007 _________________________________ 

 Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-00605-BTM-AJB Document 92 Filed 08/06/07 Page 2 of 2