Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_16-cv-00031/USCOURTS-casd-3_16-cv-00031-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:0405id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANGELO DON SANCHEZ,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 16cv31-LAB (BLM)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

vs.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Angelo Don Sanchez challenges the denial of his claim for disability benefits under

the Social Security Act. The challenge was referred to Magistrate Judge Major for a Report

and Recommendation (“R & R”). Judge Major issued her R & R, finding that Sanchez’s

summary judgement motion should be granted, the Commissioner’s summary judgment

motion should be denied, and the case should be remanded for further administrative

proceedings. No objections were filed. 

A district court has jurisdiction to review a Magistrate Judge’s report and

recommendation on dispositive matters. Fed R. Civ. P. 72(b). “The district judge must

determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly

objected to.” Id. “A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the

findings or recommendation made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

/ / /

- 1 - 16cv31

Case 3:16-cv-00031-LAB-BLM Document 16 Filed 10/12/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Under both the Standing Order of the undersigned Judge and Local Rules of the

Court, the failure to file an objection to a motion may be construed as consent to the motion

being granted, and the Court extends this to the failure to file an objection to a R & R. Local

Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c). The Court has reviewed Judge Major’s thorough R & R and finds it is

correct. It is ADOPTED. 

Sanchez’s motion for summary judgment is therefore GRANTED, the Commissioner’s

motion for summary judgment is DENIED and the case is REMANDED for further

administrative proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 12, 2016

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge

- 2 - 16cv31

Case 3:16-cv-00031-LAB-BLM Document 16 Filed 10/12/16 Page 2 of 2