Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05003/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05003-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN SARAVIA, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DYNAMEX, INC., DYNAMEX FLEET

SERVICES, INC., DYNAMEX

OPERATIONS EAST, INC., and

DYNAMEX OPERATIONS WEST, INC.,

Defendants. /

No. C 14-05003 WHA

NOTICE RE

DECERTIFICATION MOTION

On the motion to decertify, plaintiffs’ counsel shall set forth in detail in their opposition

a plan to try the case on a class-wide basis, including specifically a method of proof to establish

liability across the board on a class-wide basis. Put differently, how can we avoid a trial within

a trial as to each opt-in’s situation, for example, to find out how many employees work for each

opt-in and so forth. Both sides shall further brief (movant on its reply) what would keep, if we

did decertify, each opt-in from commencing his own action against Dynamex in this court. Is

opting-in equivalent to intervention such that we must keep all of the opt-ins as individual

plaintiffs anyway?

Dated: July 19, 2016 WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-05003-WHA Document 159 Filed 07/20/16 Page 1 of 1