Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00405/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00405-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIE WEAVER,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEUEL VOCATIONAL INSTITUTION, 

et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-0405 KJN P

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed March 17, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis 

affidavit or pay the required filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so 

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now 

expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an application to 

proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

Case 2:15-cv-00405-JAM-KJN Document 4 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: April 28, 2015

/weav0405.fifp

Case 2:15-cv-00405-JAM-KJN Document 4 Filed 04/28/15 Page 2 of 2