Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01519/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01519-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESTATE OF CAROL KLIGGE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

FIDELITY MORTGAGE OF )

CALIFORNIA, et al. )

)

Defendants. )

)

____________________________________)

CIV F 05-1519 AWI DLB

ORDER VACATING

HEARING DATES OF MARCH

13, 2006, AND MARCH 20,

2006, AND CONTINUING

HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO

APRIL 3, 2006

This is an action by the estate of Carol Kligge (“Plaintiff”) against a number of financial

institutions for the alleged failure of the institutions to adequately protect Carol Kligge’s

financial interests and against several individuals for fraud or failure to protect from the fraud of

others. On February 6, 2006, defendants Alliance Title Co., and Susan White, filed motions to

dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On February 8, 2006,

defendant Union Bank of California filed a motion to dismiss, also pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). 

Hearing on each of these motions was scheduled for oral argument to be held March 13, 2006. 

On March 7, 2006, Plaintiff and defendants Susan White and Alliance Title Company stipulated

to continue the hearing on the motions to dismiss until April 3, 2006. To the best of this court’s

knowledge the hearing on defendant Union Bank’s motion to dismiss was not continued and no

opposition to that motion has been received as of the date of this order. Plaintiff’s opposition to

the motion to dismiss was due not later than February 27, 2006. Because no opposition to Union

Bank’s motion to dismiss was filed as of the date due, the motion may not be opposed at oral

argument. Local Rule 78-230(b). The court has reviewed defendant Union Bank’s motion and

Case 1:05-cv-01519-AWI-DLB Document 62 Filed 03/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. Local Rule 78-

230(h). The court also notes that there is a stipulated agreement to continue the hearing on the

motion of defendant Fidelity Mortgage of California, which was scheduled for oral argument on

March 20, 2006, to April 3, 2006.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing dates of March 13,

2006, and March 20, 2006, are VACATED, and no party shall appear at those times. The motion

to dismiss by defendant Union Bank will be taken under submission as of April 3, 2006. The

dates for hearing on the motions to dismiss of defendants Alliance Title Co., Susan White and

Fidelity Mortgage of California are ordered continued to April 3, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01519-AWI-DLB Document 62 Filed 03/10/06 Page 2 of 2