Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_17-cv-03166/USCOURTS-azd-2_17-cv-03166-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Leo Davis,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Paul Penzone, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-17-03166-PHX-SMB (CDB)

ORDER 

Prior to this case being assigned to this division, then Magistrate Judge Bade issued 

a report and recommendation (Doc. 19). Plaintiff filed an objection that was never ruled 

on. The Court has now reviewed the report and recommendation, Plaintiff’s objection and 

Defendant’s reply to the objection. The Court has reviewed the Report and 

Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that 

the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and 

Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the 

Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the meaning 

of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, 

the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”).

Case 2:17-cv-03166-SMB-CDB Document 51 Filed 01/28/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge (Doc. 19) is accepted.

Dated this 28th day of January, 2020.

Case 2:17-cv-03166-SMB-CDB Document 51 Filed 01/28/20 Page 2 of 2