Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00753/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00753-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID SEARS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BANK OF AMERICA, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-CV-0753 KJM AC 

ORDER 

 In a minute order filed by the court on February 12, 2016, the status conference for 

the above case was reset for March 3, 2016, and the parties were instructed to file a joint status 

report at least seven (7) days prior to the conference. The parties filed their joint status report on 

February 22, 2016, but there was no appearance by plaintiff’s counsel Pamela Palmieri at the 

March 3rd conference. Defense counsel relayed to the court that Ms. Palmieri informed him that 

she is not plaintiff’s counsel. 

///// 

///// 

///// 

///// 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:15-cv-00753-KJM-AC Document 48 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, Ms. Palmieri is ordered to inform the court of her status as counsel of 

record for plaintiff, and ordered to show cause why she should not be sanctioned in the amount of 

$250.00 for failing to appear at the status conference.1

DATED: March 10, 2016 

 

1

 The court notes this is not the first time Ms. Palmieri has been directed to respond to an order 

to show cause. See Park et al. v. Bank of America, et al., 13-CV-1717 LKK DAD (ECF Nos. 9 

and 13); Alvarez v. Bank of America NA, et al., 13-CV-2090 MCE EFB (ECF No. 14)’ Meza v. 

Chase Home Finance, LLC, et al., 14-CV-0565 MCE DAD (ECF Nos. 4 and 5) 

Case 2:15-cv-00753-KJM-AC Document 48 Filed 03/11/16 Page 2 of 2