Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00035/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00035-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEO MORIN, CV-F-06-0035-LJO-DLB-P

 

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 19)

v.

ORDE R D I SMISS ING

COMPLAINT/ACTION

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff Leo Morin (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil right action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed October 23, 3006, the court found that plaintiff’s amended

complaint failed to state any claims for relief against the named defendants. The court dismissed

plaintiff’s amended complaint and ordered plaintiff to file an second amended complaint within thirty

(30) days from the date of service of that order. More than thirty days passed and plaintiff did not file

a second amended complaint or otherwise respond to the court’s order.. 

On December 15, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that this

action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, for Plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s order of October 23,

2006 and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Findings and

Recommendation was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and

Recommendation were to be filed within twenty (20) days of the date of service of the order. Over

Case 1:06-cv-00035-LJO-DLB Document 21 Filed 02/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

twenty (20) days have passed and Plaintiff filed no objections nor responded to the court in any way. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds that the Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued December 15, 2006 is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Complaint, and therefore this action, is DISMISSED for Plaintiff’s failure to obey the

Court’s order of October 23, 2006 and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 27, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00035-LJO-DLB Document 21 Filed 02/28/07 Page 2 of 2