Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01467/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01467-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Stipulation re: Modification of Scheduling Order 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Patience Milrod 

Law Office of Patience Milrod 

844 N. Van Ness Avenue 

Fresno, California 93728 

559/442-3111 

559/442-3164 fax 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION

TERRY HILLBLOM, SANDRA HILLBLOM ) No. 1:07-CV-01467 LJO SMS 

 and C. MICHAEL L., a minor, by and ) 

and through his guardians ad litem, TERRY) 

and SANDRA HILLBLOM, ) 

) 

Plaintiffs, )

) 

v. ) 

) 

COUNTY OF FRESNO; FRESNO COUNTY) 

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; FRESNO ) 

COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF ROBERT ) 

CAREY; FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S ) 

SERGEANTS KATHY CARREIRO and ) 

E. BROUGHTON; and DOES 1 through 50. ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

) 

Plaintiffs TERRY HILLBLOM, SANDRA HILLBLOM and MICHAEL L., by 

and through his guardians ad litem, TERRY AND SANDRA HILLBLOM 

(“Plaintiffs”) and defendants COUNTY OF FRESNO, RICHARD PIERCE, 

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER RE: 

MODIFICATION OF 

SCHEDULING ORDER

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-01467-LJO -SMS Document 74 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 3
Stipulation re: Modification of Scheduling Order 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

ROBERT CAREY, KATHY CARREIRO, and ERIC BROUGHTON (“Defendants”) 

hereby stipulate to the following modification of the current scheduling order. 

On March 9, 2010 the parties entered into a stipulation to amend the entire 

scheduling order in order to participate in mediation, expecting the mediation to 

take place in April. Such a schedule would have allowed the parties sufficient 

time to take additional depositions, avoiding expenditure of attorneys’ fees and 

costs if the mediation were successful. However, due to conflicting schedules, the 

mediation could not take place until May 10, 2010; even though this date would 

not allow time for depositions, the parties held off seeking another amendment of 

the scheduling order until we learned the outcome of the mediation. 

The parties unsuccessfully mediated the case on May 10, 2010. They therefore 

now seek an amended scheduling order so that parties may now take the 

depositions they had deferred pending mediation. This stipulation does not 

request an order changing any hearing dates, or the trial date. 

Therefore, the parties request the Court issue an Order making the 

following changes to the Scheduling Order in this case: 

Expert Disclosure: from May 17, 2010 to June 15, 2010

Supplemental Expert Disclosure: from June 7, 2010 to July 15, 2010

Nonexpert Discovery Cutoff: from May 17, 2010 to August 1, 2010

Expert Discovery Cutoff: from July 15, 2010 to August 1, 2010

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-01467-LJO -SMS Document 74 Filed 05/21/10 Page 2 of 3
Stipulation re: Modification of Scheduling Order 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Dated: May 11, 2010 

/s/ Patience Milrod 

PATIENCE MILROD 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: May 11, 2010 Weakley, Arendt & McGuire LLP 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

/s/ Michael Linden 

By MICHAEL LINDEN 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Note: Any hearing dates, pre-trial or trial dates may only be 

Amended by Judge O’Neill and only upon a showing of good cause. 

Dated: 5/18/2000 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

 HON. SANDRA SYNDER 

 Judge of the District Court 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-01467-LJO -SMS Document 74 Filed 05/21/10 Page 3 of 3