Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00849/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00849-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Plaintiff’s document (Doc. 41) is entitled “Memorandum and 1

Request for Review,” which is construed as a motion for

reconsideration by the district judge. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER T. HARRELL, No. 2:06-CV-0849-MCE-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

GUST KEPREOS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff brings this action for damages, invoking this

court’s diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

section 1332. Pending before the court is a motion for

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s January 25, 2007,

order.1

///

///

Case 2:06-cv-00849-MCE -CMK Document 47 Filed 06/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 72-

303(f), a magistrate judge’s order shall be upheld unless

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the

entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to

law. The January 25, 2007, order is, therefore, affirmed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion for reconsideration is denied; and

2. The magistrate judge’s January 25, 2007, order is

affirmed.

Dated: June 8, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00849-MCE -CMK Document 47 Filed 06/11/07 Page 2 of 2