Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01709/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01709-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

M., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-01709-LJO-SAB

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO 

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS 

SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR 

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ORDER 

SETTING MANDATORY SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE

(ECF No. 5-1)

FIVE DAY DEADLINE

On November 13, 2015 an order issued reassigning this action to the undersigned. On 

November 16, 2015, an order setting the mandatory scheduling conference issued. Pursuant to 

the November 16, 2015 order, the parties were required to appear for a mandatory scheduling 

conference on March 8, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. and file a joint scheduling report one week prior to the 

conference. The parties did not file a joint statement or appear for the March 8, 2016 scheduling 

conference. Further, the Court notes that Plaintiffs have not filed a notice that service has been 

completed in this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within five days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiffs shall show cause 

in writing why sanctions should not issue for the failure to comply with or 

otherwise respond to the November 16, 2016 order. 

Case 1:15-cv-01709-LJO-SAB Document 9 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiffs are advised that failure to comply with this order will result in the 

issuance up sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01709-LJO-SAB Document 9 Filed 03/10/16 Page 2 of 2