Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01850/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01850-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 29:754 Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERGEI PORTNOY, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1850 DFL DAD PS

vs.

US BANK, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On April 18, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections

to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 18, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied;

Case 2:04-cv-01850-DFL-DAD Document 41 Filed 06/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is granted as to the

third cause of action with respect to defendants Robinson and Tehee only; 

4. Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is granted as to the

first, second and eighth causes of action with respect to all defendants; and

5. Defendant U.S. Bank is directed to file an answer within twenty days. 

DATED: 6/10/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01850-DFL-DAD Document 41 Filed 06/14/05 Page 2 of 2