Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00425/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00425-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRED PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

S. CUNNINGHAM, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1:08 cv 00425 AWI YNP GSA (PC)

ORDER RE: FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS 

Document # 13

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

72-302.

On March 3, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending dismissal

of certain claims and defendants for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 

Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305,

this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

analysis.

Case 1:08-cv-00425-AWI-BAM Document 17 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 3,

2010, are adopted in full; and

2. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendants Cunningham and

Mullins for violations of the First and Eighth Amendments.

3. Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claim is dismissed for failure to state a claim.

4. Defendants Gambline, Hartman, Mack, Large, Sailor, Lynker and Hopkins are

dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to state any claims against them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 5, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-00425-AWI-BAM Document 17 Filed 04/05/10 Page 2 of 2