Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05885/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05885-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1 Thomas Marc Litton (SBN 119985) 

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

tlitton@nydclaw.com

SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP

555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-4774 

Facsimile: (415) 421-4784 

Steven L. Wittels (pro hac vice) 

swittels@nydclaw.com

Jeremy Heisler (pro hac vice) 

jheisler@nydclaw.com

SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 

1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor 

New York, NY 10022 

Telephone: (646) 723-2947 

Facsimile: (646) 723-2948 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque, 

Herman Richardson, and the Plaintiff Class

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOE LEWIS LUQUE, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AT&T CORP., et al., 

Defendants. 

3:09CV5885 (CRB) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE DATE OF CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the parties hereto through 

their attorneys of record, that subject to the Court’s approval, the Case Management Conference 

(the “CMC”) currently calendared for May 14, 2010 at 8:30 a.m. is rescheduled to June 25, 2010 

at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Collective Action Certification is also noticed to 

be heard by the Court on June 25th at 10:00 a.m. (Doc. 35). 

This change in the schedule is necessary because Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs, Steven L. 

Wittels, is also counsel in a gender discrimination class action trial currently ongoing in the U.S. 

Case No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB) – STIPULATION 

1

Case 3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document 39 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 2
District Court for the Southern District of New York, Velez v. Novartis (1:04-cv-9194). 

Although it was expected that the trial would be completed by the currently scheduled date of the 

CMC, it now appears that the proceedings will continue. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The CMC has been rescheduled one previous time by stipulation of the parties and 

endorsement by the Court. A short postponement to June 25, 2010 will not affect the overall 

schedule in the case as the parties will in the meantime continue with briefing on Plaintiffs’ 

collective action Motion and also proceed with discovery as outlined in the parties’ Joint 26(f) 

Report (Doc. 37). 

DATED: May 12, 2010 SANFORD, WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque, Herman 

Richardson, and the Plaintiff Class 

By: /Steven L. Wittels/ 

 Steven L. Wittels 

DATED: May 12, 2010 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

Attorneys for Defendants AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell 

Telephone Co., and AT&T Communications of California, 

Inc. 

By: /Jeffrey D. Wohl/ 

 Jeffrey D. Wohl 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO 

ORDERED, this ___ day of May 2010. ________________________________ 

Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

U.S. District Judge 

Case No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB) – STIPULATION 

2

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-05885-CRB Document 39 Filed 05/13/10 Page 2 of 2