Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-02000/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-02000-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 04-02000 CW

REVISED JOINT STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, 

INC., a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

02 MICRO INTERNATIONAL 

LIMITED, a Cayman Islands corporation,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C 04-02000 CW

E-FILING

ORDER GRANTING REVISED JOINT 

STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL 

DISCOVERY

HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN

02 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, 

a Cayman Islands corporation,

Counterclaimant,

v.

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, 

INC., a California corporation and 

ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR 

MANUFACTURING CORPORATION 

LIMITED aka ADVANCED 

SEMICONDUCTOR 

MANUFACTURING CORPORATION 

OF SHANGHAI, a Chinese joint venture,

Counter Defendants.

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 75 Filed 08/10/05 Page 1 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 04-02000 CW

-2-

REVISED JOINT STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.11, Defendant and Counterclaimant O2 Micro International 

Limited (“O2 Micro”) and Counter-defendant Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing 

Corporation Limited (“ASMC”), through their respective counsel of record, submit this Revised 

Joint Stipulation Re: Limited Jurisdictional Discovery to ASMC; [Proposed] Order in accordance 

with the current Case Management schedule entered on or about April 21, 2005.

This Revised Joint Stipulation is based upon the following recitals:

WHEREAS, on June 6, 2005, ASMC filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal 

jurisdiction (“Motion to Dismiss”);

WHEREAS, the Court has initially stayed discovery pending receipt of the Court’s final 

disposition of ASMC’s Motion to Dismiss;

WHEREAS, on June 28, 2005, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court ordered, inter 

alia, the following: (1) O2 Micro may take limited jurisdictional discovery; (2) the parties 

complete jurisdictional discovery by August 31, 2005; (3) O2 Micro files its opposition to the 

Motion to Dismiss by September 16, 2005; (4) ASMC files its reply, if any, to the Motion to 

Dismiss by September 30, 2005; and (4) the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is continued to 

October 14, 2005; 

WHEREAS, ASMC now requests two additional weeks to respond to O2 Micro’s 

jurisdictional discovery requests, including O2 Micro’s (1) First Set of Request for Production of 

Documents and Things and (2) First Set of Interrogatories;

WHEREAS, O2 Micro has agreed to ASMC’s request for extension of time to respond to 

O2 Micro’s jurisdictional discovery requests. Because O2 Micro’s lead counsel, Terrence P. 

McMahon, is scheduled to be at another trial, however, O2 Micro is not available for a hearing on 

the Motion to Dismiss until December 2, 2005;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel of record, jointly 

propose and stipulate to the following modification to the Court’s Amended Order Granting Joint 

Stipulation Re: Modification to Case Management Order, dated April 21, 2005, and Order 

Granting as Modified Joint Stipulation re: Limited Jurisdictional Discovery to ASMC, dated July 

28, 2005;

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 75 Filed 08/10/05 Page 2 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 04-02000 CW

-3-

REVISED JOINT STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1. The parties will complete jurisdictional discovery by September 14, 2005;

2. O2 Micro will file its opposition to ASMC’s Motion to Dismiss by October 13, 

2005; 

3. ASMC will file a reply to the Motion to Dismiss, if any, by November 4, 2005; 

and 

4. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is continued to December 2, 2005.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 75 Filed 08/10/05 Page 3 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 04-02000 CW

-4-

REVISED JOINT STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

DATED: August 3, 2005 By: /s/ Shinyung Oh

Ned N. Isokawa

Shinyung Oh

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

55 Second Street, 24th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: 415.856.7000

Facsimile: 415.856.7100

Attorneys for Advanced Semiconductor

Manufacturing Corporation Limited

DATED: August 3, 2005 By: /s/ Bijal V. Vakil

Terrence P. McMahon

Stephen J. Akerley

Bijal V. Vakil

Shamita D. Etienne

James Glore

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

3150 Porter Drive

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212

Telephone: 650.813.5000

Facsimile: 650.813.5100

DATED: August 3, 2005 By: /s/ Duane H. Mathiowetz

Korula T. Cherian

Duane H. Mathiowetz

HOWREY LLP

525 Market Street, Suite 3600

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: 415.848.4900

Facsimile: 415.848.4999

Attorneys for O2 Micro International Ltd.

DATED: August 3, 2005 By: /s/ Michael Barclay

Michael Barclay

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

650 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, CA 94304

Telephone: 650.493.9300

Facsimile: 650.565.5100

Attorneys for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 75 Filed 08/10/05 Page 4 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 04-02000 CW

-5-

REVISED JOINT STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

ORDER

The Amended Order Granting Joint Stipulation Re: Modification to Case Management 

Order, dated April 21, 2005, and Order Granting as Modified Joint Stipulation re: Limited 

Jurisdictional Discovery to ASMC, dated July 28, 2005 are modified to reflect the following:

1. The parties will complete jurisdictional discovery by September 14, 2005;

2. ASMC continues to retain the right to object to any such jurisdictional discovery 

propounded by O2 Micro; 

3. O2 Micro will file its opposition to ASMC’s Motion to Dismiss by October 13, 

2005; 

4. ASMC will file a reply to the Motion to Dismiss, if any, by November 4, 2005; 

and 

5. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is continued from October 14, 2005 to 

December 2, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED. THE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS 

ALSO RESCHEDULED FROM 12/16/05 TO 12/2/05 AT 10:00 A.M. JOINT FCMC 

STATEMENT DUE ONE WEEK PRIOR TO CONFERENCE.

DATED: Aug. 10, 2005 /s/ CLAUDIA WILKEN

The Honorable Claudia Wilken

United States District Court Judge

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 75 Filed 08/10/05 Page 5 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 04-02000 CW

-6-

REVISED JOINT STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

DECLARATION OF SHINYUNG OH PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 § X

I, Shinyung Oh, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, 

counsel of record for counter-defendant Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation 

Limited in the action entitled Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. O2 Micro International Ltd., 

Case No. C 04-2000-CW pending before this Court. I am a member in good standing of the State 

Bar of California and am admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of California. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration and, if 

called as a witness, I could and would testify competently to such facts under oath.

2. I attest that the conformed signature of Bijal V. Vakil, counsel of record for O2 

Micro International, Inc., appearing in the signature block of the REVISED JOINT 

STIPULATION RE: LIMITED JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY TO ASMC; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER is Mr. Vakil’s signature, and that Mr. Vakil has authorized me to file the REVISED 

JOINT STIPULATION RE: LIMITED JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY TO ASMC; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER.

3. I attest that the conformed signature of Duane H. Mathiowetz, counsel of record 

for O2 Micro International, Inc., appearing in the signature block of the REVISED JOINT 

STIPULATION RE: LIMITED JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY TO ASMC; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER is Mr. Mathiowetz’s signature, and that Mr. Mathiowetz has authorized me to file the 

REVISED JOINT STIPULATION RE: LIMITED JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY TO 

ASMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER.

4. I attest that the conformed signature of Michael Barclay, counsel of record for 

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., appearing in the signature block of the REVISED JOINT 

STIPULATION RE: LIMITED JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY TO ASMC; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER is Mr. Barclay’s signature, and tha t Mr. Barclay has authorized me to file the REVISED 

JOINT STIPULATION RE: LIMITED JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY TO ASMC; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 75 Filed 08/10/05 Page 6 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 04-02000 CW

-7-

REVISED JOINT STIPULATION RE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

true and correct. Executed on August 3, 2005 in San Francisco, California. 

/s/ Shinyung Oh

Shinyung Oh

SF/374235.3

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 75 Filed 08/10/05 Page 7 of 7