Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01299/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01299-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CURTIS LEE MORRISON (CSBN 321106) 

Red Eagle Law LC 

5256 S. Mission Road, Suite 135 

Bonsall, CA 92003 

Phone: (714)661-3446 

Email: curtis@redeaglelaw.com 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

United States Attorney 

ELLIOT C. WONG 

Assistant United States Attorney 

501 I St., Ste. 10-100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2764 

E-mail: elliot.wong@usdoj.gov 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LAILAA IQBAL, ET AL., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

ANTONY BLINKEN, ET AL., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-01299-KJM-KJN 

SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME OF PLAINTIFFS’ 

DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 143 

District Court Judge Kimberly J. Mueller 

Plaintiffs’ deadline to file an opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is currently 

February 24, 2024. 

However, Defendants have already interviewed both remaining Beneficiary Plaintiffs on January 

29, 2024 at US Embassy Islamabad. While one Beneficiary Plaintiff was issued a visa, the application for 

Plaintiff IRSA JAMIL (case number: ISL2021725006) was refused under 221(g) and put in administrative 

processing. Considering the possibility that the administrative processing for Plaintiff IRSA JAMIL’s 

Case 2:23-cv-01299-KJM-CSK Document 34 Filed 02/12/24 Page 1 of 2
 

2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

application will be completed soon, Plaintiffs seek a 30-day extension of their deadline, which Defendants 

do not oppose. 

Thus, the parties stipulate to continuing Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment from February 24, 2024 to March 25, 2024. 

Dated: February 6, 2024 

/s/ Curtis Lee Morrison

Dated: February 6, 2024 

CURTIS LEE MORRISON 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

/s/ ELLIOT C. WONG 

ELLIOT C. WONG 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Counsel for Defendants

ORDER 

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

that the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is extended to 

March 25, 2024. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 12, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-01299-KJM-CSK Document 34 Filed 02/12/24 Page 2 of 2