Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00456/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00456-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY ANDREW HALL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-0456 MCE KJM P

vs.

C. PLILER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On June 30, 2005, plaintiff filed an “opposition to motion for summary

judgment.” That document was not served on defendants. Plaintiff is advised that every

document submitted to the court for consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P.

5. Documents not to be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S.

mail. If an attorney has filed a document with the court on behalf of any defendants, then

documents submitted by plaintiff must be served on that attorney and not on the defendants. 

Every document submitted conventionally to the court (e.g., on paper by a prisoner proceeding

pro se) must include a certificate stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to

defendants or their attorney and the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and

(c).

/////

Case 2:02-cv-00456-MCE-KJM Document 115 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the date of

this order plaintiff shall serve a copy of plaintiff’s June 30, 2005 “opposition to motion for

summary judgment” on counsel for defendants and shall file proper proof of said service. 

Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of

sanctions. Plaintiff is further cautioned that failure to serve any documents subsequently filed in

this action properly, and failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may

result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

DATED: July 11, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/kf

hall0456.35a

Case 2:02-cv-00456-MCE-KJM Document 115 Filed 07/12/05 Page 2 of 2