Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00675/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00675-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 mot plf’s xtn2 - Andelin v. Comm’r SSA C-07-00675 JF (RS) -1-

James Hunt Miller (SBCal # 135160)

P.O. Box 10891

OAKLAND CA 94610

 Telephone: (510) 451-2132

 Facsimile: (510) 451-0824

 E-mail: jim_miller0@ yahoo.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOIS ANDELIN, ) 

)

Plaintiff, ) CIV NO 07-675 JF (RS)

)

v. )

) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

Michael J. Astrue, ) ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF 

COMMISSIONER OF the SOCIAL ) TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

) JUDGMENT AND/OR REMAND

Defendant. ) (no hearing)

______________________________ )

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their

undersigned attorneys, pursuant to L.R. 6-2(a), and subject to approval of the

Court, that Plaintiff may have an extension of 14 days, or from July 11, 2007 to

July 25, 2007, in which to file her Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Remand.

Plaintiff’s undersigned attorney here declares that: this is Plaintiff’s second

request for an extension for this filing, the only extensions for the case; The need

for this extension is occasioned by the unforseen extra time needed for perusing a

larger than normal administrative record in order to develop factual arguments;

The effect on deadlines, pursuant to the Procedural Order for Social Security

Review Actions, would be to make Defendant’s Cross-Motion (30 days after

**E-filed 7/16/07** ----------------

Case 5:07-cv-00675-JF Document 9 Filed 07/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

1 This signature is authorized by Defendant’s counsel, as

communicated verbally (on the phone) to the filer.

mot plf’s xtn2 - Andelin v. Comm’r SSA C-07-00675 JF (RS) -2-

Motion), and then Plaintiff’s Reply (14 days after Cross-Motion), due on dates no

more than two weeks later than before, when the cross-motions would be

submitted without a hearing or needing to change the Court’s schedule. 

DATE: 07/11/07 /s/_________________________ 

James Hunt Miller

Attorney for Plaintiff

DATE: July 11, 2007 Scott N. Schools

United States Attorney

 By:/s/1______________________

Deborah Lee Stachel

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: ___________________ __________________________________

United States District Judge

7/16/07 Jeremy Fogel

Case 5:07-cv-00675-JF Document 9 Filed 07/16/07 Page 2 of 2