Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01664/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01664-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 07CV1664 WQH (LSP)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAZEN HINDI,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 07CV1664 WQH (LSP)

ORDER CONSTRUING

STIPULATION TO FILE

AMENDMENT TO ANSWER AS

JOINT MOTION TO FILE

AMENDMENT TO ANSWER AND

GRANTING JOINT MOTION

vs.

EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION, a

New York Corporation and DOES 1-100,

Inclusive

Defendants.

HAYES, Judge:

On August 22, 2007, Defendant Exxonmobil Oil Corporation (Exxonmobil) removed this

action to this Court. (Doc. # 1). Before filing the notice of removal, Defendant Exxonmobil had

previously answered Plaintiff Mazen Hindi’s Complaint while the case was pending in California

State Superior Court.

On October 19, 2007, the parties filed a stipulation to allow Defendant Exxonmobil to file an

amended answer. (Doc. # 7). The Court construes the stipulation (Doc. # 7) as a joint motion to allow

Defendant Exxonmobil to file an amended answer. See Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies

and Procedures Manual, § 2(f)(4).

Good cause appearing, the joint motion (Doc. # 7) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file an

amended answer, which shall be complete in itself, on or before Friday, November 30, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 30, 2007

WILLIAM Q. HAYES

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-01664-WQH-LSP Document 8 Filed 10/30/07 Page 1 of 1