Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00716/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00716-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACOB RAY SOLORIO, 

formerly known as Brianna Nycole 

Solorio,

Plaintiff,

v.

LISA LARRANAGA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:19-cv-00716-DAD-SAB (PC)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW 

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY ACTION 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO 

OBEY A COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE 

TO STATE A CLAIM

(ECF No. 9)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Jacob Ray Solorio is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On November 25, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff 

had failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 9.) The Court’s screening order 

provided Plaintiff with the legal standards that applied to their claims and granted Plaintiff leave 

to file a first amended complaint within thirty days after service of the order. (Id.)

However, Plaintiff has not filed a first amended complaint or otherwise communicated 

with the Court, and the time in which to do so has passed.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that, within fourteen (14) days from the date of 

service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why the instant action should not be 

Case 1:19-cv-00716-DAD-SAB Document 11 Filed 01/07/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s November 25, 2019 screening order, 

failure to prosecute, and failure to state a claim for relief. Plaintiff can comply with this order to 

show cause by filing a first amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s November 25, 

2019 screening order. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order will result in a 

recommendation to a district judge that the instant action be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure 

to prosecute, failure to obey a court order, and failure to state a cognizable claim for relief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2020 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-00716-DAD-SAB Document 11 Filed 01/07/20 Page 2 of 2