Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_98-cv-00442/USCOURTS-caed-2_98-cv-00442-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1340 IRS: Custom Duties

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-98-0442 FCD DAD 

vs.

LEE D. WIGHT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

__________________________/

On June 15, 2007, defendant Lee D. Wight filed a motion to

vacate, void, and abate this court’s June 4, 2007 Order, which

the court interprets as a motion for reconsideration. Pursuant

to E.D. Cal. L.R. 78-230(k), a party seeking reconsideration of

the court’s ruling on a motion must set forth the material facts

and circumstances surrounding each motion, including “what new or

different facts or circumstances are claimed to exist which did

not exist or were not shown upon prior motion.” E.D. Cal. L.R.

78-230(k)(3). Upon review of defendant’s briefing, defendant has

failed to set forth new or different facts or circumstances that

were not shown or considered at the time of the prior motion. 

Case 2:98-cv-00442-DAD-DB Document 237 Filed 09/24/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, this

court’s order, filed June 4, 2007, is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 24, 2007

Case 2:98-cv-00442-DAD-DB Document 237 Filed 09/24/07 Page 2 of 2