Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04479/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04479-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BEST BUY TO ANSWER 

CASE NO. 3:09 CV 04479 JSW 

BRYAN K. ANDERSON <bkanderson@sidley.com> (SBN 170666)

MARC R. ASCOLESE <mascolese@sidley.com> (SBN 251397) 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1715 

Telephone: 415-772-1200 

Facsimile: 415-772-7400 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Best Buy Co., Inc. and BestBuy.com, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SpeedTrack, Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Amazon.com, Inc.; Costco Wholesale 

Corporation; 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.; 

Barnesandnoble.com, LLC; Barnesandnoble.com, 

Inc.; The Home Depot, Inc.; Nike, Inc.; Northern 

Tool & Equipment Catalog Co., Inc.; J & R 

Electronics, Inc.; Dell, Inc.; Best Buy Co., Inc.; 

BestBuy.com, LLC; Systemax, Inc.; OfficeMax, 

Inc.; Macy’s, Inc.; Macys.com, Inc.; 

Overstock.com, Inc.; Recreational Equipment, 

Inc.; Value Vision International, Inc., dba 

ShopNBC.com; B &H Foto & Electronics Corp.; 

Hewlett-Packard Company; Redcats USA, Inc.; 

Retail Convergence, Inc., dba Smartbargains.com

Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No: 3:09 CV 04479 JSW 

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS BEST BUY CO., INC. 

AND BESTBUY.COM, LLC TO ANSWER 

OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE 

COMPLAINT 

[Civil L.R. 6-2] 

Case 4:09-cv-04479-JSW Document 74 Filed 11/30/09 Page 1 of 4 Case3:09-cv-04479-JSW Document52 Filed11/19/09 Page1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BEST BUY TO ANSWER 

CASE NO. 3:09 CV 04479 JSW 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENDING TIME FOR BEST BUY TO ANSWER

WHEREAS, Plaintiff SpeedTrack, Inc. (“SpeedTrack”) filed this action for infringement of 

SpeedTrack’s U.S. Patent No. 5,544,360 (“the ‘360 patent”) on September 23, 2009; 

WHEREAS, SpeedTrack has served its Complaint on Defendants Best Buy Co., Inc. and 

BestBuy.com LLC (“Best Buy”) on October 1, 2009; 

WHEREAS, SpeedTrack and Best Buy previously filed a stipulation under Local Rule 6-1(a) 

on October 16, 2009 [Docket No. 11] agreeing to extend the time for Best Buy to answer or 

otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint to November 20, 2009; 

WHEREAS, the parties to this Action filed a Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Staying 

Action on November 16, 2009 [Docket No. 48] wherein the parties agree that this case should be 

stayed until such time as both (i) the reexamination of the ‘360 patent is resolved and (ii) judgment 

in SpeedTrack, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et. al., Case No. 06-CV-07336-PJH (“the Wal-Mart 

Action”) or an order dismissing the Wal-Mart Action is entered; 

WHEREAS, the resolution of both the reexamination of the ‘360 patent and Wal-Mart 

Action may substantially narrow the issues involved in this action; 

WHEREAS, Best Buy has requested an extension of time to respond to SpeedTrack’s 

Complaint until at least 21 days after the date of the Court’s Order lifting any stay that may be 

granted in this action, without prejudice to Best Buy seeking further extensions as appropriate; and 

WHEREAS, Best Buy’s request for an extension is not made for the purpose of delay. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between SpeedTrack and Best 

Buy through their respective counsel of record, THAT: 

The date by which Best Buy must answer or otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint 

shall be extended as follows: If the Court grants a stay of this litigation, then Best Buy shall have 21 

days to answer or otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint from the date of the Court’s order 

lifting the stay, without prejudice to Best Buy seeking further extensions as appropriate. If the Court 

denies the request to stay, then Best Buy shall have 21 days to answer or otherwise respond from the 

date of the Court’s order, without prejudice to Best Buy seeking further extensions as appropriate. 

Case 4:09-cv-04479-JSW Document 74 Filed 11/30/09 Page 2 of 4 Case3:09-cv-04479-JSW Document52 Filed11/19/09 Page2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BEST BUY TO ANSWER 

CASE NO. 3:09 CV 04479 JSW 

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: November 19, 2009 

Of Counsel: 

RICHARD A. CEDEROTH 

rcederoth@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

One South Dearborn 

Chicago, IL 60603 

Telephone: 312-853-7000 

Facsimile: 312-853-7036 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

 /s/ Bryan K. Anderson 

BRYAN K. ANDERSON (SBN 170666)

bkanderson@sidley.com 

MARC R. ASCOLESE (SBN 251397) 

mascolese@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1715 

Telephone: 415-772-1200 

Facsimile: 415-772-7400 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Best Buy Co., Inc. and BestBuy.com, LLC

Dated: November 19, 2009 HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP

 /s/ Alan P. Block

RODERICK G. DORMAN 

dormanr@hbdlawyers.com 

ALAN P. BLOCK 

blocka@hbdlawyers.com 

MARC MORRIS 

morrism@hbdlawyers.com 

HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2900 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Telephone: 213-694-1200 

Facsimile: 213-694-1234 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SpeedTrack, Inc.

Case 4:09-cv-04479-JSW Document 74 Filed 11/30/09 Page 3 of 4 Case3:09-cv-04479-JSW Document52 Filed11/19/09 Page3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BEST BUY TO ANSWER 

CASE NO. 3:09 CV 04479 JSW 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

The date by which Best Buy must answer or otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint 

shall be extended as follows: If the Court grants a stay of this litigation, then Best Buy shall have 21 

days to answer or otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint from the date of the Court’s order 

lifting the stay, without prejudice to Best Buy seeking further extensions as appropriate. If the Court 

denies the request to stay, then Best Buy shall have 21 days to answer or otherwise respond from the 

date of the Court’s order, without prejudice to Best Buy seeking further extensions as appropriate. 

Dated: 

 JEFFREY S. WHITE 

 United States District Judge 

Case3:09-cv-04479-JSW Document52 Filed11/19/09 Page5 of 5

November 30, 2009

Case 4:09-cv-04479-JSW Document 74 Filed 11/30/09 Page 4 of 4