Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-05326/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-05326-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS, AND FOR DEFENDANTS’ TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE

446126

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SANFORD L. MICHELMAN, ESQ. (SBN 179702)

smichelman@mrllp.com

RYAN HONG, ESQ. (SBN 174640)

rhong@mrllp.com

MARC R. JACOBS, ESQ. (SBN 185924)

mjacobs@mrllp.com

BENJAMIN HORWITZ, ESQ. (SBN 306757)

bhorwitz@mrllp.com

MICHELMAN & ROBINSON, LLP

10880 Wilshire Blvd., 19th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90024

Telephone: (310) 564-2670

Facsimile: (310) 564-2671

Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAN VIGDOR; STEPHEN BRADWAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAN VIGDOR, an individual; STEPHEN 

BRADWAY, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC., a California

corporation (formerly known as 12 GIGS, 

INC.); NICHOLAS TALARICO, an 

individual; DOES 1-50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No.: 16-cv-05326-HSG

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE 

PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, 

AND TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE 

DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ 

RESPONSE

Current Deadline to File Response: 1/5/17

Stipulated Deadline to File Response: 1/17/17

Current Motion to Dismiss Hearing Date:

Date: March 2, 2017

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Dept.: Courtroom 10

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Date Filed: September 1, 2016

Trial Date: None Set

Case 4:16-cv-05326-HSG Document 31 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS, AND FOR DEFENDANTS’ TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE

446126

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss is extended to January 17, 2017. Subsequently, Defendants’ deadline to respond 

to Plaintiffs’ Response is extended to January 24, 2017.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 27, 2016 _____________________________

Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Case 4:16-cv-05326-HSG Document 31 Filed 12/27/16 Page 2 of 2