Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01984/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01984-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar #202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK MOLSKI, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION

SERVICES:HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ALBERTSON’ S, INC., a Delaware

corporation,

Defendant. ___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 04-1984 JW

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“ Agreement”) herein, each party is to bear its

own costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511

U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of

settlement agreements).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON -2-

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: October 14, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Jennifer L. Steneberg

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

Dated: October 5, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF BRAD S. SURES

By: /s/ Brad S. Sures

Brad S. Sures

Attorneys for Defendant ALBERTSON’ S, INC.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: _____________, 2005

Hon. James Ware

UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE

Oct 19