Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00711/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00711-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY V. BALDWIN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0711 WBS GGH P

vs.

CDCR, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order, filed on December 10, 2009, defendants’

request for a stay of this action pending resolution of plaintiff’s interlocutory appeal was granted. 

Judge Shubb therein granted defendants fourteen days following the Ninth Circuit’s ruling on the

interlocutory appeal to file a responsive pleading. On December 27, 2010, plaintiff filed a

“motion to move forward,” noting that he had voluntarily dismissed his appeal because he had

since been transferred to another prison, the relief he had been seeking in appealing the district

court’s denial of his request for emergency injunctive relief. The order of the Ninth Circuit

granting plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal of the interlocutory appeal was filed on

November 29, 2010. Therefore, pursuant to Judge Shubb’s order, defendants’ responsive

pleading was due on December 13, 2010, plus pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), three days, or by

Case 2:09-cv-00711-KJM-AC Document 56 Filed 01/05/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

no later than December 16, 2010. Defendants have not filed a responsive pleading.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The stay of this matter is lifted, nunc pro tunc, and pursuant to the court’s order

filed on December 10, 2009, as of November 29, 2010;

2. Defendants must show cause within seven days for their failure to comply with

the court’s order filed on December 10, 2009, and must also file any responsive pleading within

that time;

3. Plaintiff’s “motion to move forward,” filed on December 27, 2010 (docket #

52), is vacated as moot. 

DATED: January 5, 2011

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

bald0711.ord

Case 2:09-cv-00711-KJM-AC Document 56 Filed 01/05/11 Page 2 of 2