Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00590/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00590-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 10 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 6 Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 11 Filed 07/26/06 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 10 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 2 of 6 Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 11 Filed 07/26/06 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 10 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 3 of 6 Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 11 Filed 07/26/06 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 10 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 4 of 6 Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 11 Filed 07/26/06 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JAMES FREDERICK; 06-CV-0590-WA 

SAMANTHA GANGIDINE; 06-CV-0643-WA 

NED GODFREY; 06-CV-0565-WA 

LORI ROBINSON; 06-CV-0663-WA 

SHARIE WALKER; 06-CV-0587-WA 

LUCAS WEBB; 06-0598-WA 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P., 

et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Assigned to: Hon. William Alsup 

[Proposed] ORDER SHORTENING TIME 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(b) 

AND 6-2

Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 10 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 5 of 6 Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 11 Filed 07/26/06 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b) and 6-2, plaintiffs James Frederick, Samantha 

Gangidine, Ned Godfrey, Lori Robinson, Sharie Walker, and Lucas Webb, by and through their 

counsel, and defendants AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca LP, by and through their 

counsel, stipulated to a shortened notice period and briefing schedule on defendants’ Motion to 

Vacate Order of Dismissal (“Motion to Vacate”). 

Specifically, the parties stipulated to the following deadlines and hearing date. 

Friday, July 21, 2006: Electronic filing and service of the Motion to 

 Vacate on all parties by 11:59 p.m. 

Wednesday, August 2, 2006 Electronic filing and service of the Opposition 

 to the Motion to Vacate on all parties by 11:59 

 p.m. 

Friday, August 11, 2006: Electronic filing and service of the Reply in

 support of Motion to Vacate on all parties by 

 11:59 p.m. 

Thursday, August 17, 2006: Hearing on the Motion to Vacate at 8:00 a.m. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

By:

Dated: ____________________ 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 10 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 6 of 6

July 26, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:06-cv-00590-WHA Document 11 Filed 07/26/06 Page 6 of 6