Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02361/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02361-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware

corporation, and DOES 1–50,

Defendants. /

AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION.

 /

No. C 06-02361 WHA

REQUEST RE CASE

MANAGEMENT

In the interests of case management, each side is requested to file a short memorandum

up to ten pages in length, addressing (i) what substantive motions are expected to be made

before the trial to streamline the case (excluding motions in limine directed at evidentiary

items), (ii) what are your recommendations regarding whether the same jury should hear both

the patent and antitrust cases, and (iii) to what extent the jury will need or should hear the

inequitable conduct cases. Please file by APRIL 30, 2007, AT NOON. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 190 Filed 04/20/07 Page 1 of 1