Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03658/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03658-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

It seems that the parties should have filed this request before the mediation deadline

lapsed. 

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

PAUL CASAREZ,

Plaintiff,

 v.

COUNTY OF SAN BENITO and SHERIFF

CURTIS HILL,

Defendants.

 /

No. C04-03658 HRL

ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES’

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND

DEADLINES FOR MEDIATION AND

FACT DISCOVERY

Before the court is the parties’ stipulated request for an order (1) extending the April 4, 2005

deadline for completing mediation to June 1, 20051 and (2) extending the current June 6, 2005 fact

discovery cutoff to June 30, 2005.

The court is not persuaded that an extension is necessitated by the parties’ inability to

complete certain depositions until April 1, 2005. Further, it is not clear when the outstanding medical

and psychiatric records were subpoenaed.

Nonetheless, it seems that the parties have made efforts to move this case forward; and it does

not appear that the requested extensions will affect other deadlines set by this court’s January 4, 2005

Case Management Order. Accordingly, the deadline for completing mediation and the mediator’s

Case 5:04-cv-03658-HRL Document 14 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

jurisdiction to mediate this matter is extended to June 1, 2005. The fact discovery cutoff is extended

through June 30, 2005.

The parties are advised that the fact that this extension has been granted will not be considered

good cause for future requests (if any) to extend case management deadlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:04-cv-03658-HRL Document 14 Filed 05/09/05 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:04-cv-3658 Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

Michael Edward Adams equitist@earthlink.net 

Michael C. Serverian mserverian@rllss.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered

for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Case 5:04-cv-03658-HRL Document 14 Filed 05/09/05 Page 3 of 3