Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02781/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02781-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

STIPULATION AND - 1 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

NASSER HAMEDANI, an individual doing 

business as GLOBAL VISION 

UNLIMITED, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BAYER CORPORATION, an Indiana 

Corporation, BAYER HEALTHCARE 

LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability 

Company, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned 

counsel of record for Plaintiff, Nasser Hamedani ("Hamedani"), and Defendants, Bayer 

Corporation and Bayer HealthCare LLC (collectively, "Bayer"), that there is good cause, 

pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for the entry of a protective order 

in this action for the reasons set forth below. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the discovery that is anticipated 

will encompass confidential marketing and financial data, future business plans, confidential 

customer information and trade secrets, which, if disclosed without adequate controls, would put 

the disclosing party at a commercial disadvantage. Accordingly, the parties believe a Protective 

Order is necessary in order to control the disclosure of confidential information among the 

parties. Further, Hamedani and Bayer have agreed, as set forth in more detail below, to act in 

good faith in designating confidential information as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” or 

“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” in recognition of the public policy disfavoring the filing of 

documents under seal. 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 1 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 2 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned 

counsel of record for Hamedani and Bayer, and subject to the approval of the Court, that if in the 

course of these proceedings either party or any third-party witness has occasion to disclose 

information designated by such party as “Protected Information” (as defined below), the 

following procedures shall be employed and the following restrictions shall govern: 

1. This Stipulated Protective Order (“Order”) applies to all documents, information, 

tangible things, and testimony disclosed during discovery in this action (“Discovery Material”) 

by a party in this action or by a third party (“Disclosing Party”) to another party(ies) (“Receiving 

Party”), including all portions of transcripts of depositions, exhibits, answers to interrogatories, 

responses to requests for admission, documents or things, that are designated by the Disclosing 

Party in accordance herewith as containing or comprising confidential or proprietary information 

within the meaning of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(7) (hereinafter “Protected Information”) as more 

fully set forth herein. 

2. “Highly Confidential Information” and “Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information” mean 

Protected Information of the type contemplated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, and which has not been 

made public by the Disclosing Party and which the Disclosing Party regards as proprietary, as 

more fully defined in Paragraphs 4 and 7. 

3. Unless the parties agree in writing otherwise, all Discovery Material containing 

Protected Information shall be used solely in connection with the claims or defenses in this 

action. Any such Discovery Material containing Protected Information shall not be used for any 

business, commercial, competitive, personal, or other purpose. Protected Information shall not 

be disseminated to anyone, nor made public, nor used, except as permitted by this Stipulated 

Protective Order or by order of the Court. Nothing in this Order shall restrict a Disclosing Party 

in any manner with regard to use or disclosure of its own Protected Information. 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 2 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 2 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 3 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

4. A Disclosing Party may designate as “Highly Confidential” any Discovery 

Material that contains Protected Information, including, but not limited to, confidential financial 

and business information or other proprietary business or technical information of either its own 

or of another which the Disclosing Party is under a duty to maintain highly confidential. Highly 

Confidential Information as used in this Order shall refer to any so designated material and all 

copies thereof, and shall also refer to the information contained in such materials. No 

designation shall be made unless counsel of record believes in good faith that the designated 

material is entitled to protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. 

5. Except as provided in Paragraph 10, all documents containing Highly 

Confidential Information shall be marked at the time that copies are produced to a Receiving 

Party with the legend “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” stamped or labeled on each page (or on the 

first page only of a bound document) in a manner so as not to interfere with the legibility thereof. 

6. Discovery Materials designated as Highly Confidential shall be maintained in 

confidence by the Receiving Party pursuant to the requirements of Paragraph 3 herein, and shall 

not be disclosed to any person except: 

(a) the Court and its officers, under seal, following a granting of a motion to file 

under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5; 

(b) lead and local counsel of record and employees of such counsel of record; 

(c) in-house counsel and their support staff; and 

(d) third parties engaged by counsel or the parties to assist in this litigation 

provided that such third party has signed an undertaking in the form of Exhibit A hereto 

(copies of which signed declaration shall be provided to the other parties herein only 

upon a showing of good cause). 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 3 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 3 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 4 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

7. A Disclosing Party may designate as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” any Discovery 

Material that contains Protected Information that constitutes trade secret or other proprietary 

competitive information that the Disclosing Party believes in good faith should not be disclosed 

to persons other than lead and local counsel of record, employees of such counsel of record, and 

independent experts or consultants. Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information shall refer to any so 

designated material and all copies thereof and shall also refer to the information contained in 

such materials. No designation shall be made unless counsel of record believes in good faith that 

the designated material is entitled to protection under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure and the standard set forth herein. 

8. All documents containing Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information shall be marked at 

the time that copies are produced to a Receiving Party with the legend “ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY” stamped or labeled on each page (or on the first page only of a bound document) in a 

manner so as not to interfere with the legibility thereof. 

9. Discovery materials designated as Attorneys’ Eyes Only shall be maintained in 

confidence for use by litigation counsel who must have access to such documentation solely for 

use in connection with this action and shall not be disclosed to any person except: 

(a) the Court and its officers, under seal following a granting of a motion to file 

under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5; 

(b) lead and local counsel of record and employees of such counsel of record; and 

(c) third parties engaged by counsel or the parties to assist in this litigation 

provided that such third party has signed an undertaking in the form of Exhibit A hereto 

(copies of which signed declaration shall be provided to the other parties herein only 

upon a showing of good cause). 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 4 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 4 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 5 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10. When producing files and records for inspection, no marking need be made by the 

Disclosing Party in advance of the inspection. For purposes of the inspection by the Receiving 

Party, all documents produced shall be considered as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” Thereafter, upon 

selection of specified documents for copying by the Receiving Party, or should the Disclosing 

Party copy and produce documents directly without an initial inspection, the Disclosing Party 

shall mark the documents as provided for in Paragraphs 5 and 8. 

11. Specific testimony at a deposition may be designated “Highly Confidential” or 

“Attorneys’ Eyes Only” by making a statement to that effect on the record at the deposition. 

Categories of deposition testimony containing Protected Information may also be designated at 

the deposition if it appears in good faith that, based on the question or series of questions, the 

answer(s) will involve topics appropriate for such designations, and it would be more efficient to 

designate by categories. If testimony at a deposition is designated Highly Confidential or 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only, only those persons who may have access to such Protected Information, 

under the terms of this Order, may be in attendance to hear that testimony. 

12. The Disclosing Party shall require that the court reporter provide separate 

transcript volumes for the “Highly Confidential” and “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” portions of the 

transcript. A Disclosing Party designating hearing or deposition testimony as “Highly 

Confidential” or “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall have the covers of such volumes of the transcript 

separately labeled by the court reporter with the respective legends in materially the following 

forms: 

"HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — THIS PORTION OF THIS TRANSCRIPT 

CONTAINS INFORMATION WHICH HAS BEEN DESIGNATED HIGHLY 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 5 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 5 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 6 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS 

ACTION.” 

or 

“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY — THIS PORTION OF THIS TRANSCRIPT 

CONTAINS INFORMATION WHICH HAS BEEN DESIGNATED 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY PURSUANT TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN 

THIS ACTION.” 

13. Within a 30-day period after receipt by the Disclosing Party of the deposition or 

hearing transcript, counsel for the Disclosing Party shall have the opportunity to review the 

transcript and correct any mis-designations and shall make any additional designations by page 

and line number believed in good faith to constitute Protected Information. Counsel for the 

Disclosing Party shall notify, in writing, the court reporter and the Receiving Party within such 

30-day period of such corrections or additional designations. Prior to the expiration of the 30-

day period, counsel for the Receiving Party shall retain and treat any non-designated portions of 

the transcript as Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information (except that the witness deposed may be 

furnished with a copy of his transcript). 

14. A Receiving Party may show any employee of the Disclosing Party a document 

designated by the Disclosing Party as Protected Information for the purpose of interrogation at a 

deposition or hearing. 

15. Neither anything in this Order nor acceptance by a party of information disclosed 

pursuant to this Order shall constitute or be construed as an acknowledgement or admission that 

any Discovery Materials designated by a Disclosing Party as such are in fact Protected 

Information or entitled to confidential treatment. This Order shall be without prejudice to either 

party to question at any time whether or not any particular information is Protected Information. 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 6 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 6 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 7 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

16. If a party designates any Discovery Material as Protected Information, and the 

Receiving Party objects in writing that the designation is not warranted or justified as to all or 

any part of the designated material, the Disclosing Party, in compliance with any orders by the 

Court, shall confer in good faith, in person or by telephone, with the Receiving Party to 

reconsider the challenged designation. If, after conferring, the Receiving and Disclosing Parties 

are unable to reach agreement as to the challenged designation, then the objecting party may file 

a motion for a determination by the Court as to the unresolved objections and the appropriateness 

of the challenged designation. If the objecting party does not file a motion challenging the 

designation within sixty (60) days from the date the Receiving and Disclosing Parties first confer 

on the issue, and unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the challenged designation shall stand. 

The Disclosing Party shall have the burden of proving the propriety of the challenged 

designation. 

17. Nothing in this Order shall preclude any Receiving Party, or any other person who 

is bound by this Order, from utilizing information that was known to or possessed by the 

Receiving Party or other person before the Receiving Party or other person became bound by this 

Order, or which lawfully came into the Receiving Party’s or other person’s possession outside of 

the discovery process in this action. Any such use of such information shall not constitute a 

violation of this Order. Nevertheless, each Disclosing Party retains the right to pursue any claim 

or defense it may have against any Receiving Party or other person arising from such use of such 

information. However, if a Disclosing Party disputes the Receiving Party’s or other person’s 

position, it shall object in writing, and shall proceed as set forth in Paragraph 16 hereto. If the 

Court determines that, consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(7) and the provisions of this 

Stipulated Protective Order, the information in question appears to be of a type that should be 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 7 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 7 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 8 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

characterized as Protected Information, then any Receiving Party or other person claiming that 

the information has been in the possession of such Receiving Party or other person or has been in 

the public domain prior to disclosure of such information through discovery, shall have the 

burden of proving such public knowledge. 

18. Should any party to this litigation obtain documents or information from a third 

party, by subpoena or otherwise, that contain, or can reasonably be assumed to be, or with 

respect to which it has been advised contains, Protected Information of a party to this litigation, 

such documents or information shall be treated by the Receiving Party as Highly Confidential 

Information or Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information under this Order, as appropriate, unless 

expressly released in writing by the party that is the owner of such Protected Information or 

otherwise ordered by the Court. 

19. Any documents that are filed with the Court which contain Highly Confidential 

Information or Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information may be filed under seal in accordance with the 

Court’s order granting the filing party’s application pursuant to Local Rule 79-5 and in 

accordance with the criteria set forth in Local Rule 79-5. All such documents shall be filed in a 

sealed envelope bearing title of the case, the case number, the title of the document and the 

following statement: 

CONFIDENTIAL 

This envelope contains confidential information and is filed pursuant to the 

Stipulated Protective Order dated _______, 2006. The confidentiality of the 

material is to be maintained and the envelope is not to be opened, or the 

contents revealed to any individual, except by order of the Court. 

20. If Protected Information is disclosed to any person other than in the manner 

authorized by this Order, the party responsible for the disclosure must: (a) immediately bring all 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 8 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 8 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 9 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

pertinent facts relating to such disclosure to the attention of all counsel of record and, (b) without 

prejudice to other rights and remedies of the Disclosing Party, make reasonable efforts to prevent 

further disclosure of the Protected Information by the person who improperly received such 

information. 

21. The inadvertent or unintentional failure to designate discovery materials as Highly 

Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only shall not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of a 

Disclosing Party’s claim of confidential treatment under the terms of this Order. If a document, 

transcript, or thing is produced for which the designation “Highly Confidential” or “Attorneys’ 

Eyes Only” is lacking but should have appeared, the Disclosing Party may restrict future 

disclosure of the document, transcript, or thing in accordance with this Order by notifying the 

Receiving Party in writing of the change in or addition of such restrictive designation with 

respect to the document, transcript, or thing, and providing substitute copies, with appropriate 

designations, of each such document, transcript, or thing. The Receiving Party shall then take 

reasonable steps to prevent any further disclosure of such newly designated Protected 

Information, except as permitted by this Order, and shall, within ten (10) business days of receipt 

of the substitute copies, return or destroy the originally produced items and all copies. 

22. Any person in possession of another party’s Protected Information who receives a 

subpoena (or other process) from any person (including natural persons, corporations, 

partnership, firms, governmental agencies, departments or bodies, boards, or associations) that is 

not a party to this Order seeking production or other disclosure of such Protected Information 

shall, if not otherwise prohibited by law, give prompt written notice to counsel for the party or 

nonparty who produced and/or designated the materials as Protected Information, identifying the 

material sought and enclosing a copy of the subpoena or other process. Where possible, at least 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 9 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 9 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 10 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ten (10) business days’ notice before production or other disclosure shall be given. In no event 

shall production or disclosure be made before the latest of: (1) the date on which the notice is 

given, or (2) the return date of the subpoena or other process. The party receiving the subpoena 

(or other process) shall reasonably cooperate with efforts by the Disclosing Party to oppose 

production pursuant to the subpoena or to condition production upon the imposition of 

conditions to protect against public disclosure of the Protected Information. Further, if 

production pursuant to the subpoena or other process is required before reasonable notice can be 

given to counsel for the party or nonparty who produced and/or designated the material sought, 

counsel for the party receiving the subpoena shall object in writing to the production by stating 

that the Protected Information sought has been designated “Highly Confidential” or “Attorneys’ 

Eyes Only.” 

23. Nothing herein shall be construed to affect in any way the admissibility of any 

document, testimony or other evidence. 

24. Within thirty (30) days of final termination of this action, including any appeals 

(or such other amount of time on which counsel mutually agree), each Receiving Party shall be 

under obligation to assemble and return to the Disclosing Party, or alternatively, upon mutual 

agreement of the parties and counsel, to destroy and provide a certificate of destruction of, all 

Protected Information received, directly or indirectly, from the Disclosing Party, including all 

copies of such material which may have been made. The return of such material shall be 

acknowledged by the Disclosing Party in writing. Furthermore, counsel shall destroy all copies 

with any attorneys’ markings, and any digests or summaries thereof which have been made, or 

prepared from such documents in the course of creating attorney work product. Notwithstanding 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 10 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 10 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 11 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

the foregoing, a single copy of such Protected Information may be retained for archival purposes 

only in outside counsel’s files. 

25. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, this Stipulated Protective Order shall 

be without prejudice to the right of any party to challenge the propriety of discovery on grounds 

of privilege, relevance, materiality, undue burden, or as is otherwise provided for under Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 26. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver of any objection which 

might be raised as to the admissibility at trial of any documents produced or information 

obtained during the discovery process. 

26. This Stipulated Protective Order shall be without prejudice to the right of any 

party to apply to the Court for relief from this Order as justice may require. 

27. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Stipulated 

Protective Order for six (6) months after the final termination of this action. 

Dated: April 4, 2006 _____/s/ Kevin R. Martin___________________

 McNichols Randick O'Dea & Tooliatos, LLP 

Kevin R. Martin 

 Partick E. Guevara 

 5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 400 

 Pleasanton, CA 94588 

 Telephone: (925) 460-3700 

 Facsimile: (925) 460-0969 

Dated: April 4, 2006 ______/s/ Angela K. Steele___________________ 

Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson 

LLP 

 Raymond I. Geraldson, Jr. 

 Thad Chaloemtiarana 

 Danielle B. Lemack 

 Angela K. Steele 

 311 South Wacker Drive, Suite 5000 

 Chicago, Illinois 60606 

 Telephone: (312) 554-8000 

 Facsimile: (313) 554-8015 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 11 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 11 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 12 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Glynn & Finley, LLP 

 Clement L. Glynn 

 One Walnut Creek Center 

 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 

 Walnut Creek, California 94596 

 Telephone: (925) 210-2800 

 Facsimile: (925) 945-1975 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

 

Dated: _______________, 2006 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 12 of 14

April 11

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 12 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 13 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

EXHIBIT A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

NASSER HAMEDANI, an individual doing 

business as GLOBAL VISION 

UNLIMITED, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BAYER CORPORATION, an Indiana 

corporation, BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, 

a Delaware Limited Liability Company, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 

AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

I am employed as ____________ [position] by _______________________, [name of 

employer], located at ___________________________ ___________________ [address]. I 

acknowledge that I have read the Protective Order entered by the Hon. Martin J. Jenkins on 

__________________, 2006 in the action entitled Nasser Hamedani, an individual doing 

business as Global Vision Unlimited v. Bayer Corporation and Bayer Healthcare LLC Case No. 

C05-02781 MJJ (N.D. Cal.), that I understand the terms thereof, and that I agree to be bound by 

such terms. I agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, if any disputes arise over my use of the 

information I receive pursuant to this Non-Disclosure Agreement. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the 

United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed this ______ day of _________ at _____________, ____________. 

 Name: 

 Title: 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 13 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 13 of 14
STIPULATION AND - 14 - Case No. C 05 02781 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 35 Filed 04/04/2006 Page 14 of 14
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 38 Filed 04/11/06 Page 14 of 14