Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_16-cv-00134/USCOURTS-azd-4_16-cv-00134-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to

portions of the Report and Recommendation. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734,

739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Gerald Markham, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Pima County, et al. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 16-134-TUC-JAS (JR) 

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge

Rateau. In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Rateau recommends granting

in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss. As the Court finds that the Report

and Recommendation appropriately resolved the motion, both Defendants’ and Plaintiff’s

objections are denied.1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) is accepted and

adopted in its entirety.

(2) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 23) is granted in part and denied in part as

Case 4:16-cv-00134-JAS-JR Document 45 Filed 12/01/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

discussed in the Report and Recommendation.

(3) The motion for an extension of time (Doc. 42) is granted

(4) This case is hereby referred back to Magistrate Judge Rateau for all pretrial

proceedings and report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72, and LRCiv 72.1, 72.2, and 72.3 of the Rules of

Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. 

DATED this 1st day of December, 2016.

Case 4:16-cv-00134-JAS-JR Document 45 Filed 12/01/16 Page 2 of 2