Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05164/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05164-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CURTIS W. ADAMS, ET AL., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ET AL., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 13-cv-05164-YGR 

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS 

AS MOOT IN LIGHT THEREOF 

RE: DKT. NO. 62, 63, 64 

Plaintiffs Curtis W. Adams and Francis R. Adams, acting pro se, filed their complaint 

against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) in the Superior Court of California, 

County of Alameda, on September 24, 2013. By Notice of Removal filed November 11, 2013, the 

complaint was removed to this Court. (Dkt. No. 1, Exhibit A, “Complaint.”) Wells Fargo moved 

to dismiss the complaint on a number of grounds, including res judicata. 

On March 30, 2015, the Court issued its order granting the motion to dismiss without leave 

to amend as to Plaintiffs’ claim under the Truth In Lending Act (“TILA”), and with leave to 

amend as to all other claims. (Dkt. No. 61, “Order.”) Plaintiffs were given until April 21, 2015, 

to file an amended complaint, and were cautioned in the Order that “[i]f no amended complaint is 

filed by that date, this action will be dismissed.” (Id. at 10.) 

Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint by April 21, 2015, nor have they filed any 

amended pleading or any other document since the entry of the Court’s Order. On July 9, 2015, 

Plaintiff Curtis Adams filed a Request for Extension of Time To File Amended Complaint. (Dkt. 

No. 64.) 

Case 4:13-cv-05164-YGR Document 65 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the Request for Extension of Time To File 

Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs must file any amended complaint no later than July 31, 2015. 

Should they fail to do so, this action will be dismissed. Defendant Wells Fargo shall file its 

response to any amended complaint within 21 days thereafter. 

Based upon the foregoing, Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to file an 

amended complaint timely (Dkt. No. 62) is DENIED AS MOOT. 

This terminates Dkt. No. 62, 63, and 64. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 10, 2015 

______________________________________ 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:13-cv-05164-YGR Document 65 Filed 07/10/15 Page 2 of 2