Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03294/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03294-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 891
Nature of Suit: Agricultural Acts
Cause of Action: 07:499 Agricultural Commodities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HILDA & ALICE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

KRISTIAN SEGURA,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-03294-KAW 

ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFING ON PREJUDGMENT 

INTEREST CALCULATION

Re: Dkt. No. 12

On November 5, 2015, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff's motion for default judgment. 

During the hearing, Plaintiff's counsel represented that prejudgment interest was calculated based 

on the delinquency date for the last unpaid invoice. This is not clear upon further review of 

Plaintiff's moving papers. Mr. Bartlett's declarations indicate that interest was calculated as of 

May 1, 2015. (See Bartlett Decl. ¶ 10, Dkt. No. 12-2; Supp. Barlett Decl. ¶ 10, Dkt. No. 15-1.) 

Based on the statement of account provided in connection with the motion, May 1, 2015 appears 

to correspond to the date of the first unpaid invoice, not the last unpaid invoice. (See Smith Decl. 

¶ 12, Ex. C, Dkt. No. 12-1.) Accordingly, Plaintiff shall provide a short supplemental brief 

explaining its prejudgment interest calculation within 14 days of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 11/06/15

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-03294-VC Document 17 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 1