Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02009/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02009-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION DISMISSING CASE 

CASE NO. C-05-02009-MMC 

368296.01

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065 

JAN NIELSEN LITTLE - #100029 

MICHAEL D. CELIO - #197998 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Defendants 

M. RICHARD ASHER, BRUCE McMILLAN, 

LEONARD S. COLEMAN, TIMOTHY MOTT, 

WILLIAM J. BYRON, ROBERT W. PITTMAN, 

JOEL LINZNER, WARREN C. JENSON, 

GERHARD FLORIN, LAWRENCE F. PROBST, III, 

DON A. MATTRICK, NANCY L. SMITH, 

STEPHEN BENÉ, J. RUSSELL RUEFF, JR. and 

ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WALTER HAMMOCK, derivatively on 

behalf of Nominal Defendant ELECTRONIC 

ARTS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

M. RICHARD ASHER, BRUCE 

McMILLAN, LEONARD S. COLEMAN, 

TIMOTHY MOTT, WILLIAM J. BYRON, 

ROBERT W. PITTMAN, JOEL LINZNER, 

WARREN C. JENSON, GERHARD 

FLORIN, LAWRENCE F. PROBST, III, 

DON A. MATTRICK, NANCY L. SMITH, 

STEPHEN BENÉ and J. RUSSELL RUEFF, 

JR.

Defendants,

and

ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., 

Nominal Defendant, 

 Case No. C-05-02009-MMC 

STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION 

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

Case 3:05-cv-02009-MMC Document 27 Filed 03/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION DISMISSING CASE 

CASE NO. C-05-02009-MMC 

368296.01

WHEREAS, this action was filed on May 16, 2005; and 

WHEREAS, on June 20, 2005 this action was related to case 05-1219 MMC, In re 

Electronic Arts Securities Litigation; and

WHEREAS, by order of this Court Plaintiffs were not required to file an amended 

complaint in this action until 30 days after the court ruled on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the 

Class Action complaint in In re Electronic Arts Securities Litigation; and

WHEREAS, on January 5, 2006 the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss In re 

Electronic Arts Securities Litigation, Case No, C 05-01219 MMC; and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs in this action have elected not to file an amended complaint; 

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED THAT: 

1. Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Case No. C05-02009 MMC is dismissed without prejudice. 

2. Each party shall bear its own costs. 

Dated: March 2, 2006. KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ Michael D. Celio ______________

MICHAEL D. CELIO 

Attorneys for Defendants 

M. RICHARD ASHER, et al. 

Dated: March 2, 2006. FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 

By: /s/ William B. Federman (by express permisison)

WILLIAM B. FEDERMAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

WALTER HAMMOCK 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:

By: __________________________________ 

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

March 10, 2006

Case 3:05-cv-02009-MMC Document 27 Filed 03/10/06 Page 2 of 2