Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00357/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00357-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 320
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE AGEE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0357 DFL KJM PS

vs.

JOHN DURRANCE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Defendants’ motions to dismiss are calendared for hearing on April 12, April 26 and May 24,

2006. No opposition to the pending motions has been filed. 

Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party

will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to

the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may

be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.”

Case 2:06-cv-00357-DFL -KJM Document 36 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing dates of April 12 and April 26, 2006 are vacated. Hearing on all

pending motions to dismiss is set for May 24, 2006.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition to the motions, if any, no later than May 3, 2006. 

Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of nonopposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 41(b).

3. Replies, if any, shall be filed no later than May 10, 2006.

DATED: March 30, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

agee.con 

Case 2:06-cv-00357-DFL -KJM Document 36 Filed 03/31/06 Page 2 of 2