Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00918/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00918-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PERRY ROBERT AVILA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00918-LJO-SKO PC

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

STATUS REPORT REGARDING HIS

ABILITY TO FILE OPPOSITION OR

STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

(Docs. 22, 26, 39, and 40)

FIFTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Perry Robert Avila, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 26, 2009. This action for damages is

proceeding against Defendants Meadors, Sullivan, Jones, Gonzalez, and Peterson for violation of

the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 

On March 7, 2011, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. By order filed March

24, 2011, Plaintiff was relieved of his obligation to file an opposition or a statement of nonopposition to the motion, pending resolution of the parties’ discovery dispute. Resolution of that

dispute ultimately resulted in service of subpoenas duces tecum on the custodians of record for the

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the CaliforniaCorrectional Institution. 

Pursuant to the subpoenas, any responsive documents should have been served on Plaintiff by

February 1, 2012.

///

1

Case 1:09-cv-00918-LJO-SKO Document 41 Filed 02/07/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall

file a status report regarding his ability to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 6, 2012 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-00918-LJO-SKO Document 41 Filed 02/07/12 Page 2 of 2