Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02795/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02795-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY ACTION 

LOREN LUNSFORD, CSB No. 213966

Loren.lunsford@lunsfordlegal.com

AMBER LUNSFORD, CSB No. 276908

Amber.lunsford@lunsfordlegal.com

RÉGIA ARAUJO, CSB No. 294614

Regia.araujo@lunsfordlegal.com

LUNSFORD LEGAL GROUP 

980 Ninth Street, 16th Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 692-8621

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP 

ROBERT L. CHALFANT, SBN 203051

Email: rlc@creggerlaw.com

WENDY MOTOOKA, SBN 233589

Email: wm@creggerlaw.com

1030 G Street 

Sacramento, CA 95814

Phone: 916.443-4443

Fax: 916.443-2124

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

PLACER COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE

DAVID K. HUSKEY (SBN 109329)

175 Fulweiler Avenue 

Auburn, CA 95603

Telephone: (530) 889-4044

Facsimile: (530) 889-4069

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF PLACER 

BRUCE A. KILDAY, ESQ., SB No. 066415

Email: bkilday@akk-law.com

CARRIE A. MCFADDEN, ESQ., SB No. 245199

Email: cmcfadden@akk-law.com 

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

Attorneys at Law

601 University Avenue, Suite 150 

Sacramento, CA 95825

Telephone: (916) 564-6100

Telecopier: (916) 564-6263

Attorneys for Defendants BRET BRZYSCZ and CITY OF ROSEVILLE 

Case 2:14-cv-02795-WBS-CKD Document 36 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY ACTION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SARA ADAM, ET AL,, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

BRET BRZYSCZ, ET AL.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-02795 WBS DAD

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REQUESTING STAY OF ALL 

PROCEEDINGS 

Plaintiffs Sara Adam, Et Al. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Bret Brzyscz, City 

of Roseville, County of Placer, and County of Sacramento, (collectively “Defendants”), by and 

through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the flowing: 

1. WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a civil rights complaint in the United States District 

Court in the Eastern District of California on November 29, 2014, arising out of an incident 

relating to the arrest of Plaintiff Samuel Duran and a series of raids on Plaintiffs’ homes one 

month after Plaintiff Samuel Duran’s arrest; 

2. WHEREAS Defendants Bret Brzyscz and City of Roseville filed an Answer to the 

Complaint and Defendants Placer County, Sacramento County, and Sacramento City filed 

Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Monell and state law claims. Defendants Placer County, 

Sacramento County, and Sacramento City’s Motion to Dismiss state law claims were granted as 

well as Defendants’ claim for municipal liability based on searches and seizures without probable 

cause; 

/ / / 

Case 2:14-cv-02795-WBS-CKD Document 36 Filed 04/21/16 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY ACTION 

3. WHEREAS on November 3, 2015, Defendant City of Sacramento was dismissed 

without prejudice; 

4. WHEREAS on December 21, 2015, all claims brought against Defendant County 

of Sacramento pertaining to Plaintiffs not present at the 5612 Forestwood Drive address were 

dismissed without prejudice with Plaintiffs Sara Adam, Jesse Heredia, Isabella H., and Mya H., 

continuing to assert claims against Defendant County of Sacramento; 

5. WHEREAS the Placer County District Attorney’s Office initiated criminal 

proceedings against Plaintiffs Samuel Duran following his arrest on October 25, 2013 and 

criminal proceedings against Plaintiffs Antonio Duran, Alexander Felix III, Anita Felix, Jorge 

Campos, Jose Felix, Alexis Sandoval, Danny Garcia, Juan Sanchez, and Davina Sanchez 

following their arrests on November 20, 2013; 

6. WHEREAS Plaintiffs Samuel Duran and Antonio Duran have ongoing criminal 

prosecutions against them, which arises from intertwined facts as in this civil matter; 

7. WHEREAS Plaintiff Samuel Duran’s defense relating to the criminal charges 

alleged against him will not be ready for trial for at least another nine (9) months; 

8. WHEREAS Plaintiff Antonio Duran’s defense relating to the criminal charges 

alleged against him will not be ready for trial for at least another four (4) months; 

9. WHEREAS Plaintiffs Samuel Duran and Antonio Duran intend to invoke their 

rights pursuant to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution in this civil action until 

the termination of criminal prosecutions against them; 

10. WHEREAS all parties wish to stay all proceedings in this matter, including 

hearings, briefings, appearances, discovery obligations and any other deadlines imposed by law or 

the Court, pending termination of criminal prosecutions against Plaintiffs Samuel Duran and 

Antonio Duran, which is economically and judicially efficient; 

11. WHEREAS all parties recognize that proceeding with these actions at this 

time could have potential adverse effects on the parties’ ability to prove and disprove claims in 

this matter. For these reasons, the parties jointly request that this matter be stayed to the 

conclusion of the related criminal matters in the Placer County Superior Court proceedings; 

Case 2:14-cv-02795-WBS-CKD Document 36 Filed 04/21/16 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY ACTION 

12. WHEREAS Plaintiffs agree to notify Defendants and the Court at the 

termination of the related criminal matters, at which time reasonable dates for the civil matter can 

be determined.

DATED: April 20, 2016 LUNSFORD LEGAL GROUP

By: /s/ Regia J. Araujo 

Régia J. Araujo

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED: April 20, 2016 CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

By: /s/ Robert Chalfant 

Robert Chalfant

Attorneys for Defendant County of 

Sacramento

DATED: April 20, 2016 PLACER COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE

By: /s/ David K. Huskey 

David K. Huskey

Attorneys for Defendant County of 

Placer

DATED: April 20, 2016 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

By: /s/ Carrie A. McFadden 

Carrie A. McFadden

Attorneys for Defendant City of 

Roseville and Bret Brzyscz

Case 2:14-cv-02795-WBS-CKD Document 36 Filed 04/21/16 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY ACTION 

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, this case shall remain stayed in all respects until the 

conclusion of the related criminal cases. All pending dates and deadlines are vacated. The Clerk 

is directed to administratively close this file, subject to its being reopened upon the motion of any 

party.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 20, 2016

Case 2:14-cv-02795-WBS-CKD Document 36 Filed 04/21/16 Page 5 of 5