Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00280/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00280-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALFONSO ROCCO MANENTE, and MARY

CATHERINE MANENTE, individually

and d/b/a MANENTE SPORTS BAR,

Defendants.

1:05-CV-00280

ORDER RE PARTIES FAILURE TO

PROPERLY CITE TO RECORD

EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF AND

IN OPPOSITION TO THE PENDING

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AND TAKING HEARING ON MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OFF

CALENDAR.

The district court has preliminarily reviewed the papers

submitted by the parties in support of and in opposition to the

pending motion for summary judgment. Both parties’ citations to

the record are woefully inadequate. For example, in support of

Plaintiff’s Undisputed Fact No. 3 (“Defendants intercepted and

exhibited the April 17, 2004 Program in their commercial

establishment without authorization from the Plaintiff.”),

Plaintiff’s cites “Exhibits #1 through #9 of Plaintiff’s

Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff’s

Motion for Summary Judgment....” (Doc. 50 at 2.) Plaintiff

provides no page or line citations to this range of exhibits,

which exceeds two hundred pages in length. The same failure is

exhibited by Defendant. (See Docs. 58 through 59.) The court is

under no obligation to search the record. See Keenan v. Allan,

Case 1:05-cv-00280-OWW -SMS Document 64 Filed 10/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

91 F.3d 1275, 1279 (9th Cir. 1996). With over 1400 active cases

on its docket, the district court does not have time to perform

work that it is the parties’ obligation to undertake. 

The motion for summary judgment is taken off calendar. The

parties shall resubmit their briefs and supporting papers with

proper citations to the evidence, including page numbers and line

references and obtain a new hearing date from the courtroom

deputy clerk. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 13, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

b2e55c UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00280-OWW -SMS Document 64 Filed 10/16/06 Page 2 of 2