Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04332/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04332-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

It appears that defendants’ letter brief was moot when filed. Defendants filed the letter brief

at 3:32 p.m., on February 20, 2007. The letter from plaintiff’s counsel to defendants, offering to re-open

the deposition, was faxed at 3:10 p.m., on February 20, 2007.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLINTON REILLY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MEDIANEWS GROUP INC, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-04332 SI

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY

Via letter brief, defendants seek an order from the Court compelling plaintiff Clinton Reilly to

answer deposition questions that his counsel instructed him not to answer. The issue appears to be

moot. Counsel for plaintiff has agreed to allow defendants to re-take the deposition of Mr. Reilly.1 See

Docket No. 138, Attachment 1. The Court therefore DENIES defendants’ motion to compel, without

prejudice to renewing the motion should plaintiff not fulfill his offer to re-take the deposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 5 , 2007 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-04332-SI Document 142 Filed 03/05/07 Page 1 of 1