Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00675/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00675-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT FUENTES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0675 FCD GGH P

vs.

MIKE KNOWLES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On February 23, 2007, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order filed February 2, 2007, denying plaintiff’s August 7, 2006, motion

for a preliminary injunction and September 1, 2006, supplemental motion, construed as motions

for protective orders. Plaintiff first requests that the court deem his request timely filed due to

“excusable neglect.” See Local Rule 72-303(b)(“Rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if

no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within ten court days . . . from the date of

service of the ruling on the parties.”). Good cause appearing, the court deems plaintiff’s request

timely. 

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be

upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court

finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary

to law.

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00675-FCD-GGH Document 156 Filed 03/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed February 2, 2007, is affirmed. 

DATED: March 8, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-00675-FCD-GGH Document 156 Filed 03/09/07 Page 2 of 2