Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_19-cv-01094/USCOURTS-casd-3_19-cv-01094-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:0078m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

- 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES DUFFY, individually and on behalf 

of others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 19cv1094-LAB (AHG)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL;

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 

DISMISS AS MOOT [Dkt. 18]

Plaintiff James Duffy moves to voluntarily dismiss this action without prejudice. 

Although Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss, (Dkt. 18), they have not filed an answer 

or motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiff therefore retains the right to unilaterally

dismiss the action. See Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the 

defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by 

filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”). This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. Dkt. 18. The hearing 

currently scheduled for April 13, 2020 is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2020

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

Chief United States District Judge

Case 3:19-cv-01094-LAB-AHG Document 22 Filed 02/04/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 1