Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01986/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01986-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

D.A., a minor, by and through his guardian ad

litem, CARMEN POLK,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF SAN JOSE, ROBERT DAVIS, in his

capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF

SAN JOSE; and DOES 1-25, inclusive,

Defendants.

 /

No. C05-01986 HRL

ORDER RE IN CAMERA REVIEW

AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

On July 18, 2006, this court approved the parties’ stipulation for an in camera review of

Internal Affairs files for certain identified officers. Pursuant to that order, the documents were

to have been delivered by July 24, 2006; however, the documents were not received by this

court until August 30, 2006. Nevertheless, having reviewed the files submitted, IT IS

ORDERED THAT defendants shall produce the documents marked SJ0038-111 to plaintiff’s

counsel forthwith, and in any event, no later than September 15, 2006. The documents

produced shall be subject to the following protective order:

1. The documents are to be treated as confidential and are to be used for the

purpose of the above-captioned litigation only.

2. The documents and their contents may only be disclosed by plaintiff or

*E-FILED ON 9/5/06*

Case 5:05-cv-01986-RMW Document 27 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

plaintiff’s attorneys on an as-needed basis, solely for purposes of this litigation. These

confidential documents shall not be disseminated to third parties and shall not be used in any

other litigation. Photocopies of the documents shall not be made. Counsel will advise persons

given access to the documents of the confidentiality of the documents.

3. Upon the conclusion of this litigation by final judgment, dismissal, or settlement,

all such confidential documents shall be returned to the Office of the City Attorney, located at

200 E. Santa Clara Street, San Jose, CA 951113-1905.

Dated:

 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

September 5, 2006

Case 5:05-cv-01986-RMW Document 27 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:05-cv-1986 Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

John L. Burris john.burris@johnburrislaw.com, jlblawofcs@worldnet.att.net 

Peggy S. Doyle doyle@lbbslaw.com 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have

not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Case 5:05-cv-01986-RMW Document 27 Filed 09/05/06 Page 3 of 3