Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05784/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-05784-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The Court notes that a certificate of appealability is not required in the instant

case. See Rosas v. Nielsen, 428 F.3d 1229, 1232 (9th Cir. 2005) (a state prisoner

challenging the Board of Prison Terms’ administrative decision to deny his request for

parole does not need to obtain a certificate of appealability). 

Order Denying IFP on Appeal

P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JF\HC.07\Tyson05784_appeal.wpd

1

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MORGAN A. TYSON,

Petitioner,

 vs.

ROBERT L. AYERS, Warden, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 07-05784 JF (PR)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

(Docket No. 11) 

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the California Board of Prison Terms’

denial of parole. On August 31, 2009, the Court denied the instant petition on the merits

and entered judgment in favor of Respondent. On September 21, 2009, Petitioner filed a

notice of appeal and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.1

 (Docket

No. 11.)

Case 5:07-cv-05784-JF Document 14 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Denying IFP on Appeal

P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JF\HC.07\Tyson05784_appeal.wpd

2

Petitioner was not granted pauper status in the instant action as he paid the full

filing fee. Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on

appeal (Docket No. 11) is DENIED to bringing it directly in the Ninth Circuit for an

independent review of the record to determine whether the appeal is frivolous. 

The clerk shall forward to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals the case file with this

order. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

1/4/10

Case 5:07-cv-05784-JF Document 14 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MORGAN A TYSON,

Petitioner,

 v.

ROBERT L AYERS, Warden,

Respondent. /

Case Number: CV07-05784 JF 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District

Court, Northern District of California.

That on , I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the

attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s)

hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into

an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Morgan A. Tyson C-81713

CA State Prison-Solano

P.O. Box 4000

18-129L

Vacaville, CA 95696

Dated: 

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

1/5/10

1/5/10

Case 5:07-cv-05784-JF Document 14 Filed 01/05/10 Page 3 of 3