Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_98-cv-05723/USCOURTS-caed-1_98-cv-05723-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joint Stipulation to Extend the Dates Set by the Scheduling Order Filed March 30, 2005; [Proposed] Order

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

JAMES E. FLYNN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

MARIA G. CHAN, State Bar No. 192130

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 323-1940

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Davis, Carey, 

Papac, Marshall and Padilla

CF2001CX0040

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

CHARLES E. JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOM L. CAREY, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CV-F-98-5723 AWI LJO

JOINT STIPULATION TO

EXTEND THE DATES SET BY

THE SCHEDULING ORDER

FILED MARCH 30, 2005; 

ORDER

The parties hereby stipulate to extending the deadlines set by this Court’s Scheduling

Order filed March 30, 2005. The parties stipulate to an extension of time of 30 days for all

pending deadlines. 

This Court’s Scheduling Order dated March 30, 2005, set the following dates: 

Discovery Cut-off date of October 7, 2005; Deadline to Amend Pleadings, November 7, 2005;

and Dispositive Motion Deadline, December 7, 2005. No trial date has been set. The Scheduling

Order also states that “a request for an extension of a deadline set in this order must be filed on or

Case 1:98-cv-05723-AWI -GSA Document 135 Filed 10/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joint Stipulation to Extend the Dates Set by the Scheduling Order Filed March 30, 2005; [Proposed] Order

2

before the expiration of the deadline in question” and “extensions of time will only be granted on

a showing of good cause.” 

Both parties have diligently engaged in discovery and intended to complete the

discovery process by the scheduled deadline. However, the parties have been unable to resolve

all outstanding discovery matters and need additional time to do so. The parties anticipate that an

additional thirty days will be sufficient to complete discovery.

The parties also anticipate that if the Discovery Cut-off date is extended, they will need

additional time to meet the deadline to amend the pleadings and the dispositive motions deadline. 

For this reason, the parties also stipulate to extending those deadlines as well. 

Accordingly, the parties stipulate to the following: (1) Extending the Discovery Cutoff date to November 6, 2005; (2) Extending the Deadline to Amend the Pleadings to

December 6, 2005; and (3) Extending the Dispositive Motions Deadline to January 6, 2005. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 /s/ Maria G. Chan

Dated: October 7, 2005 ________________________________

MARIA G. CHAN

Deputy Attorney General

Attorney for Defendants

 /s/Alison E. Chase

Dated: October 7, 2005 _________________________________

ALISON E. CHASE

O’Melveny & Myers LLP

Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 13, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:98-cv-05723-AWI -GSA Document 135 Filed 10/13/05 Page 2 of 2