Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05760/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05760-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Law Offices 

COTCHETT, PITRE &

MCCARTHY, LLP 

______________________________________________________________________________

[PROPOSED] CONSENT ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFFS 

ALANA KASELITZ AND MELISSA KASELITZ ONLY; Case No. C-12-5760 MMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ALANA KASELITZ, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HISOFT TECHNOLOGY 

INTERNATIONAL, LTD., et al.,

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. C-12-5760 MMC 

[PROPOSED] CONSENT ORDER 

ACKNOWLEDGING 

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT AS 

TO PLAINTIFFS ALANA KASELITZ 

AND MELISSA KASELITZ ONLY

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

Location: Courtroom 7

Case 3:12-cv-05760-MMC Document 72 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Law Offices 

COTCHETT, PITRE &

MCCARTHY, LLP 

_____________________________________________________________________________

[PROPOSED] CONSENT ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFFS 

ALANA KASELITZ AND MELISSA KASELITZ ONLY; Case No. C-12-5760 MMC

WHEREAS the Amended Judgment entered in this matter on March 24, 2016 (Doc. 70) 

in favor of Defendant hiSoft Technology International, Ltd. (Judgment Creditor) has been 

satisfied as to Plaintiffs Alana Kaselitz and Melissa Kaselitz (Judgment Debtors) only. 

Defendant hiSoft Technology International, Ltd. (Judgment Creditor) has accepted 

payment or performance other than that specified in the Judgment in satisfaction of the Judgment 

as to Plaintiffs Alana Kaselitz and Melissa Kaselitz (Judgment Debtors) only. That portion of 

the judgment for which Ted C. Lindquist III is jointly and severally obligated remains in full 

force and effect and is in no way impaired by virtue of this Consent Order. 

 

Dated: August 31, 2016 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 

 

 By: /s/ Steven N. Williams 

 Steven N. Williams 

Attorney for Defendant 

hiSoft Technology International, Ltd.

Dated: August 31, 2016 ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 

 

 By: /s/ Eileen B. Goldsmith 

 Eileen B. Goldsmith 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Alana Kaselitz and Melissa Kaselitz

 IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. 

Dated: _____________, 2016 , Clerk 

By: 

Deputy Clerk 

 September 8

 United States District Judge

, C

United States District Judge

Case 3:12-cv-05760-MMC Document 72 Filed 09/08/16 Page 2 of 2