Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-00554/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-00554-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONATHAN COLLIN AUTRY,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:22-cv-00554-TLN-JDP

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 14, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 41.) The time to 

file objections has passed, and Plaintiff did not file any objections.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 

magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court ....”). 

Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 

the record and by the proper analysis.

Case 2:22-cv-00554-TLN-JDP Document 46 Filed 04/11/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations, filed on March 14, 2024 (ECF No. 41), are

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Susan are DISMISSED without prejudice;

and

3. This mater is referred back to the magistrate judge for further pre-trial

proceedings.

Date: April 10, 2024 

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge

Case 2:22-cv-00554-TLN-JDP Document 46 Filed 04/11/24 Page 2 of 2