Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01769/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01769-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

Case No. 14-cv-01769-NC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARSON INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY 

NETWORK, CORP.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-01769-NC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

CARSON’S SUPPLEMENTAL 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE 

GRANTED AND ATN’S EVIDENCE 

EXCLUDED

Dkt. Nos. 111, 116

By its order on October 9, 2015, this Court set a briefing schedule on a 

supplemental motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Carson. Dkt. No. 111. Carson 

filed its motion as scheduled. Dkt. No. 116. ATN’s opposition was due October 23. To 

date, ATN has not filed a response, a statement of non-opposition, or a motion requesting 

leave to modify the schedule. If ATN does not respond by tomorrow, October 28, it is 

forewarned that the Court may grant Carson’s motion.

In the same order, the Court required ATN to identify by October 23 the evidence 

(expected witness testimony and proposed trial exhibits) that supports the proposition that 

it returned 419 (rather than 327) goggle units to Carson. Again, no response has been 

filed. If ATN does not respond by tomorrow, October 28, it is forewarned that the Court 

may exclude ATN’s evidence.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 27, 2015 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-01769-NC Document 119 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 1