Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01066/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01066-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID J. VALENCIA, JR., )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

 )

 )

CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, ) 

 )

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:11-CV-01066-AWI-SKO-HC

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT THIRTY

(30) DAYS IN WHICH TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR NOTICE OF NONOPPOSITION TO PETITIONER’S MOTION

TO AMEND THE FIRST AMENDED

PETITION (DOC. 47)

ORDER PERMITTING PETITIONER TO

FILE A REPLY TO ANY OPPOSITION

WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE

DATE OF SERVICE

ORDER STAYING THE FILING OF A

TRAVERSE PENDING RESOLUTION OF

PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AMEND THE

FIRST AMENDED PETITION

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303. Pending before

the court are 1) Petitioner’s request for judicial notice of

Fourteenth and Eighth Amendments in Grounds 3 and 4 and/or a

motion to amend the petition (doc. 47), which the Court

understands to be a motion to amend the first amended petition

(FAP); and 2) Petitioner’s motion to amend the FAP to change the

1

Case 1:11-cv-01066-AWI-SKO Document 49 Filed 11/01/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

name of the Respondent (doc. 37). 

I. Briefing Schedule for Petitioner’s Motion

 to Amend the Petition (Doc. 47)

Petitioner filed a first amended petition (FAP) on June 14,

2012. Respondent filed an answer on October 18, 2012. 

Respondent is GRANTED leave to file opposition or notice of

non-opposition to Petitioner’s motion to amend the FAP (doc. 47)

no later than thirty (30) days after the date of service of this

order.

Petitioner is GRANTED leave to file a reply to any

opposition filed by Respondent no later than twenty (20) days

after the date of service of any opposition.

II. Staying the Filing of a Traverse

Pursuant to this Court’s order of July 2, 2012, Petitioner’s

traverse to the answer is due thirty days after the date of

service of the answer, or on or about November 25, 2012.

In view of the pendency of Petitioner’s motion to amend the

FAP, the Court’s order to Petitioner to file a traverse is STAYED

pending resolution of Petitioner’s motion or further order of the

Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2012 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:11-cv-01066-AWI-SKO Document 49 Filed 11/01/12 Page 2 of 2