Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-294/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-03561 WHA

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

GOOGLE’S PRÉCIS REQUEST

FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER

Google filed a précis request, seeking leave to file a supplemental answer to include an

additional license defense that applies “to the extent Oracle accuses versions of Android using

OpenJDK-based code” (Dkt. No. 1443 at 2). Oracle responded that it has not accused any

version of Android containing the OpenJDK code (Dkt. No. 1451 at 2). Google has informed

the Court that Oracle’s response moots its proposed license defense (Dkt. No. 1456). 

Accordingly, Google’s précis request is DENIED AS MOOT. This is without prejudice to the

possibility that Google may raise this license defense in this case or another case if Oracle ever

accuses the versions of Android that use OpenJDK-based code.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1458 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 1