Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04632/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04632-49/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID

TRANSIT DISTRICT,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

WILLIAM D. SPENCER, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 04-04632 SI

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT

MCGAHAN’S BILL OF COSTS

On May 14, 2007, the Court issued an Order on the parties’ various post-trial motions.

Defendants subsequently filed a letter brief pointing out that the Order did not address defendant

William McGahan’s bill of costs, and plaintiff’s objections to that bill of costs. The Court agrees, and

hereby clarifies that the May 14, 2007 Order did not dispose of McGahan’s bill of costs or plaintiff’s

objections. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 54-4, the Clerk will consider plaintiff’s objections and tax the

requested costs accordingly. After the Clerk does so, either party may move for review of the Clerk’s

taxation, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 54-5.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2007 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-04632-SI Document 407 Filed 05/31/07 Page 1 of 1