Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-02001/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-02001-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Edward Harold Schad, Jr. and

Robert Glen Jones, Jr., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Janice K. Brewer, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-13-2001-PHX-ROS

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER

Plaintiffs have filed a Request for Clarification from Defendants (Doc. 25). Because

they “believe” that Defendants Notice of Disclosure (Doc. 24) “may be faulty or inaccurate,”

Plaintiffs ask the Court to direct Defendants to provide photographs of the drug labels to

confirm that Defendants’ statements are true. They also request that Defendants be required

to specify whether the pentobarbital to be used in Plaintiffs’ executions is Nembutal®. The

Request is denied. 

In compliance with the Court’s order, Defendants disclosure provided the specific

drug-information Plaintiffs requested. Although it was not supported by an affidavit, any

false statement in the disclosure would constitute a Rule 11 violation. Plaintiffs’ conjecture

and disbelief is therefore an insufficient reason to grant them additional injunctive relief. 

Case 2:13-cv-02001-ROS Document 28 Filed 10/07/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying Plaintiffs’ Request for Clarification from

Defendants (Doc. 25).

DATED this 7th day of October, 2013.

Roslyn O. Silver

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:13-cv-02001-ROS Document 28 Filed 10/07/13 Page 2 of 2