Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00525/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00525-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, 

Plaintiff,

v.

VOGEL, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-00525-AWI-SKO (PC)

SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - NOTICE 

AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS FOR 

OPPOSING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR 

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

(Doc. 97)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis for violation of his 

civil rights in this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for judgment 

on the pleadings on April 8, 2016. (Doc. 97.) Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, Nos. 09-15548, 09-

16113, 2012 WL 262 6912 (9th Cir. Jul. 6, 2012), Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 

2003), Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 

(9th Cir. 1988), the Court hereby notifies Plaintiff of the following rights and requirements for 

opposing the motion:

1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions are briefed pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). 

2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to 

Defendants' motion. Local Rule 230(l). If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a statement of 

non-opposition to the motion, this action may be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to 

prosecute. Local Rule 230(l) requires the opposition, or statement of non-opposition be filed not 

more than 21 days after the date of service of the motion. Id. However, Plaintiff is granted 21 

Case 1:13-cv-00525-AWI-SKO Document 102 Filed 04/12/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

days from the service of this order to file his opposition or statement of non-opposition.

3. Failure to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or the Local 

Rules of the Eastern District of California may result in the imposition of sanctions including but 

not limited to dismissal of the action or entry of default.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00525-AWI-SKO Document 102 Filed 04/12/16 Page 2 of 2