Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05116/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05116-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FIFTH JOINT STATUS REPORT CONCERNING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS ― No. C 03-5116 VRW

Russell L. Johnson (SBN 053833) 

rljohnson@sidley.com

Peter H. Kang (SBN 158101) 

pkang@sidley.com

Teague I. Donahey (SBN 197531) 

tdonahey@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

William J. Bohler (SBN 141970) 

wjbohler@townsend.com 

Gregory S. Bishop (SBN 184680) 

gsbishop@townsend.com 

Igor Shoiket (SBN 190066) 

ishoiket@townsend.com 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400 

Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CARSEM (M) SDN BHD, CARSEM SEMICONDUCTOR SDN BHD, and CARSEM INC., 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CARSEM (M) SDN BHD, CARSEM 

SEMICONDUCTOR SDN BHD, and 

CARSEM INC., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 

No. C 03-5116 VRW (filed Nov. 18, 2003) 

FIFTH JOINT STATUS REPORT 

CONCERNING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

Case 3:03-cv-05116-VRW Document 28 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-05116-WHA Document 30 Filed 10/06/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FIFTH JOINT STATUS REPORT CONCERNING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS ― No. C 03-5116 VRW 2

Pursuant to the Court’s request, see Docket No. 27 (Sept. 13, 2006), the parties hereby 

submit a Fifth Joint Status Report Concerning Stay of Proceedings. The parties are continuing to 

litigate their dispute before the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) in the investigation 

styled In the Matter of Certain Encapsulated Integrated Circuit Devices and Products Containing 

Same, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-501. The Administrative Law Judge issued an Initial Determination on 

November 18, 2004. Thereafter, on February 1, 2005, the ITC decided to review the ALJ’s Initial 

Determination. The ITC modified the ALJ’s claim construction regarding certain terms and 

remanded the investigation back to the ALJ for further findings in light of these changes. On 

November 9, 2005, the ALJ issued a second Initial Determination, which is now before the ITC. On 

February 9, 2006, the ITC issued an order stating that “the target date for completion of this 

investigation is extended to a date that is three (3) months after completion of the pending ASAT, 

Inc. subpoena enforcement proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.” The 

parties do not know when the ASAT, Inc. subpoena enforcement proceedings will be completed in 

the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. 

Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659, the parties respectfully request that the Stay Order 

remain in effect until the determination of the Commission in the ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-501 becomes 

final. 

Case 3:03-cv-05116-VRW Document 28 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-05116-WHA Document 30 Filed 10/06/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FIFTH JOINT STATUS REPORT CONCERNING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS ― No. C 03-5116 VRW 3

Pursuant to General Order 45(X), Plaintiff obtained concurrence in the filing of this 

document from counsel for Defendants, as listed below. 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

By: /s/ Teague I. Donahey 

Dated: September 26, 2006 

Teague I. Donahey 

Attorneys For Plaintiff 

Amkor Technology, Inc. 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

By: /s/ Igor Shoiket 

Dated: September 26, 2006 

Igor Shoiket 

Attorneys For Defendants 

Carsem (M) Sdn Bhd, Carsem Semiconductor 

Sdn Bhd, and Carsem Inc. 

Case 3:03-cv-05116-VRW Document 28 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-05116-WHA Document 30 Filed 10/06/06 Page 3 of 3