Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01480/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01480-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN PATRICK WINKLEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND 

REHABILITATION, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-1480 MCE CKD P (TEMP)

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action brought pursuant 

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 11, 2015, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. On June 23, 2015, the court granted plaintiff’s 

motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file and serve his opposition to the motion. That 

thirty days has now long expired, and plaintiff has not filed his opposition to defendants’ motion. 

Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 

opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 

the granting of the motion . . . .” On March 12, 2014, plaintiff was advised of the requirements 

for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a 

waiver of opposition to the motion. 

/////

Case 2:13-cv-01480-MCE-CKD Document 37 Filed 11/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for 

imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of 

the Court.” In the order filed March 12, 2014, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with 

the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within fourteen days of the date 

of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment filed 

on behalf of defendants. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of nonopposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this action he 

may file a request to voluntarily dismiss this case.

Dated: November 13, 2015

ec

wink1480.46msj

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:13-cv-01480-MCE-CKD Document 37 Filed 11/13/15 Page 2 of 2