Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04679/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04679-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

-1- 

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF MARGI SYTEMS, INC. 

(C 06 4679 JF (HRL))

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ROBERT J. YORIO (SBN 93178) 

ryorio@carrferrell.com 

COLBY B. SPRINGER (SBN 214868) 

cspringer@carrferrell.com 

CHRISTINE S. WATSON (SBN 218006) 

cwatson@carrferrell.com

CARR & FERRELL LLP

2200 Geng Road 

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 812-3400 

Facsimile: (650) 812-3444 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 

ACTICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE DIVISION) 

ACTICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

PRETEC ELECTRONICS CORP., a California 

corporation; C-ONE TECHNOLOGY 

CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; CNET 

TECHNOLOGY CORP., a California 

corporation; CNET TECHNOLOGY, INC., a 

foreign corporation; and MACE GROUP, INC., 

d/b/a MACALLY PERIPHERALS, INC., a 

California corporation, and MARGI SYSTEMS, 

INC., a California corporation, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 06 4679 JF (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT MARGI SYSTEMS, INC. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant ACTICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC and Defendant and 

Counter-Claimant MARGI SYSTEMS, INC. (“Margi”) hereby stipulate to a dismissal with 

prejudice of the Complaint, with respect to Defendant MARGI only, and the MARGI Counterclaim, 

pursuant to the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). The parties further agree to bear their own 

/// 

**E-filed 2/5/07**

Case 5:06-cv-04679-JF Document 43 Filed 02/05/07 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF MARGI SYTEMS, INC. 

(C 06 4679 JF (HRL))

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

attorneys’ fees and costs of suit incurred herein. 

 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 31, 2007 CARR & FERRELL LLP

By: /s/ Christine S. Watson 

ROBERT J. YORIO 

COLBY B. SPRINGER 

CHRISTINE S. WATSON 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 

ACTICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC 

Dated: January 31, 2007 BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEE 

By: /s/ Janet Pioli 

JANET PIOLI 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant 

MARGI SYSTEMS, INC. 

ORDER

 Based on the parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, the Complaint is dismissed with 

prejudice against Defendant MARGI SYSTEMS, INC. and the Counterclaim of MARGI 

SYSTEMS, INC. is dismissed in its entirety. The parties are to bear their own attorneys’ fees and 

costs of suit incurred herein. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________, 2007 By: 

HON. JEREMY FOGEL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

2/5

Case 5:06-cv-04679-JF Document 43 Filed 02/05/07 Page 2 of 2