Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05962/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05962-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTIN BONILLA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

K. DAVIS, 

Defendant. 

 /

1:03-cv-05962-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 33)

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS, AND REQUIRING

DEFENDANT TO FILE A RESPONSE

TO AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS (Doc. 28)

Plaintiff Martin Bonilla (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 30, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Case 1:03-cv-05962-OWW -SMS Document 34 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 30, 2005,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state any

claims upon which relief may be granted, filed February 18, 2005,

is DENIED; and,

3. Defendant shall file a response to plaintiff’s amended

complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of service of

this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 15, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05962-OWW -SMS Document 34 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2