Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03574/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03574-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 This disposition is not designated for publication. 1

 Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration on February 1, 2010 without seeking leave 2

of court. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se the Court reviewed the motion for

reconsideration and concluded that it was without merit. See Dkt. 31. at 2.

Case Number C 09-03574 JF (HRL)

JUDGMENT

(JFLC1)

**E-Filed 5/13/2010**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CHERYL J. PATITO,

 Plaintiff

 v.

DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN

ASSOCIATION, F.A.; DSL SERVICE

COMPANY; CENTRAL MORTGAGE

COMPANY dba CENTRAL MORTGAGE LOAN

SERVICING COMPANY; MTC FINANCIAL

INC. dba TRUSTEE CORPS; MORTGAGE

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,

INC.; and DOES 1 TO 250, inclusive,

 Defendants

Case Number C 09-03574 JF (HRL)

 

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE1

On January 15, 2010, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants

Central Mortgage Company, doing business as Central Mortgage Loan Servicing Company,

(“CMC”) and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”). On January 20, 2010, 2

the Court granted with leave to amend motions to dismiss and strike submitted by MTC

Financial Inc., doing business as Trustee Corps., (“MTC”). In its order granting MTC’s motions

Case 5:09-cv-03574-JF Document 32 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Plaintiff initiated this action on August 5, 2009. It appears that Plaintiff never served

3

Defendants Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. (“Downey Savings”) or DSL Service

Company (“DSL”). Because the 120 day period within which Plaintiff must serve defendants in

this action has long since lapsed, the action will be dismissed without prejudice as to Downey

Savings and DSL pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 

2

Case Number C 09-03574 JF (HRL)

JUDGMENT

(JFLC1)

to dismiss and strike, the Court directed that “[a]ny amended complaint shall be filed and served

within (20) days after the date of this order.” Dkt. 27 at 3. Plaintiff Cheryl J. Patito (“Plaintiff”)

did not amend within this period or request an extension within which to do so . Three months

have passed since the deadline for amendment. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED with

prejudice as to MTC. 

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 5/13/10

 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:09-cv-03574-JF Document 32 Filed 05/13/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case Number C 09-03574 JF (HRL)

JUDGMENT

(JFLC1)

This Order has been served upon the following persons:

Cheryl J Patito

1425 Little Orchard Street

San Jose, CA 95110

PRO SE

Case 5:09-cv-03574-JF Document 32 Filed 05/13/10 Page 3 of 3