Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_93-cv-00306/USCOURTS-caed-2_93-cv-00306-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY JUNIOR WEBSTER,

Petitioner,

v.

S.W. ORNOSKI, Acting Warden

of the California State Prison

at San Quentin, 

Respondent.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CIV S-93-0306 LKK DAD DP

DEATH PENALTY CASE

FURTHER SCHEDULING ORDER

This capital habeas action came before the Court on September 26, 2007, for a status

conference. Having considered the written materials submitted in connection with the status

conference, and after hearing from the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court deems the arguments presented in the respondent’s status report filed 9/25/07 to be

respondent's motion for reconsideration of the discovery order filed on May 22, 2007 (Docket #

336), based upon trial counsel's deposition testimony. Having considered respondent's request as a

request for reconsideration, the request for reconsideration is denied for reasons set forth in the

original order.

/////

Case 2:93-cv-00306-LKK-DAD Document 357 Filed 09/27/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 1

2

2. Petitioner will be allowed to present testimony from a Strickland expert witness in connection 1

with the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at penalty phase. Petitioner has until October

31, 2007, to designate the expert witness and submit testimony by declaration accompanied by

copies of exhibits and any documents submitted under Rule 7 of the Rules Governing § 2254

cases.

3. Respondent shall give notice within 14 days of the filing of the designation and declaration of

petitioner’s Strickland expert witness whether respondent intends to designate a rebuttal expert

witness. Should respondent intend to designate a rebuttal expert witness, the parties are directed to

confer and attempt to work out a schedule for the submission of the rebuttal expert’s testimony.

4. The deposition of petitioner’s Strickland expert witness shall be completed by December 31, 2007.

5. The parties shall submit briefing on the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at the penalty

phase according to the following schedule: Petitioner shall submit opening briefing by February

15, 2008; Respondent shall submit briefing by March 17, 2008; any reply briefing by petitioner

shall be submitted by April 1, 2008. 

6. In all other respects, this Court’s scheduling order of August 2, 2007 (Docket # 351), remains in

effect.

DATED: September 26, 2007.

Ddad1/orders.capital/webster0306.furschedord

Case 2:93-cv-00306-LKK-DAD Document 357 Filed 09/27/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

submitted by:

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, State Bar No. 89424

Federal Defender

/s/ Timothy J. Foley

TIMOTHY J. FOLEY, State Bar No. 111558

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

(916) 498-6666

JAMES S. THOMSON, State Bar No. 79658

819 Delaware Street

Berkeley, California 94710

(510) 525-9123

Attorneys for Petitioner

Case 2:93-cv-00306-LKK-DAD Document 357 Filed 09/27/07 Page 3 of 3