Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01664/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01664-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROPOSED ORDER C-06-1664 JCS 1

sf-2209922 

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) 

ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) 

SHANE BRUN (CA SBN 179079) 

HMcElhinny@mofo.com

ATucher@mofo.com

Sbrun@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

STV ASIA LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PRN CORPORATION, PREMIER RETAIL 

NETWORKS, INC., BEST BUY CO., INC., 

BEST BUY STORES L.P., CIRCUIT CITY 

STORES INC., CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST 

COAST, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE 

CORPORATION, WAKEFERN FOOD 

CORPORATION d/b/a SHOPRITE, and 

ALBERTSONS, LLC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. C-06-1664 JCS 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 

PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 79-5(b) 

TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

DOCUMENTS DESIGNATED 

CONFIDENTIAL 

Whereas the Court has considered Defendants’ Administrative Motion Pursuant To Civ. 

L.R. 79-5(b) To File Under Seal Documents Designated Confidential; 

Whereas the Court has determined that the following documents are properly sealable 

under Civil Local Rule 79-5: 

Exhibit A to the Declaration of Daniel E. Kyte in Support of (1) Defendants’ Motion For 

Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and (2) Rule 11 Motion Regarding Plaintiff’s Failure to 

Conduct an Adequate Pre-Filing Investigation; and 

Case 3:06-cv-01664-JCS Document 124 Filed 10/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROPOSED ORDER C-06-1664 JCS 2

sf-2209922 

Exhibit B to the Declaration of Daniel E. Kyte in Support of (1) Defendants’ Motion For 

Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and (2) Rule 11 Motion Regarding Plaintiff’s Failure to 

Conduct an Adequate Pre-Filing Investigation; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following documents be filed under seal: 

Exhibit A to the Declaration of Daniel E. Kyte in Support of (1) Defendants’ Motion For 

Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and (2) Rule 11 Motion Regarding Plaintiff’s Failure to 

Conduct an Adequate Pre-Filing Investigation; and 

Exhibit B to the Declaration of Daniel E. Kyte in Support of (1) Defendants’ Motion For 

Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and (2) Rule 11 Motion Regarding Plaintiff’s Failure to 

Conduct an Adequate Pre-Filing Investigation. 

Dated: _____________, 2006 Hon. 

Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero 

October 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:06-cv-01664-JCS Document 124 Filed 10/18/06 Page 2 of 2