Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02972/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02972-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-05-2972 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS

DIOMED HOLDING, INC. AND DIOMED,

INC. TO LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On September 6, 2007, defendants Diomed Holdings, Inc. and Diomed, Inc.

electronically filed a “Statement of Recent Decision in Support of Defendants’ Motion for

Summary Judgment of Invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 112.” Defendants have violated

General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the

Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are

filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked

‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and

‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders

For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Defendants are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply with the

Case 3:05-cv-02972-MMC Document 332 Filed 09/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court’s Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 11, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-02972-MMC Document 332 Filed 09/11/07 Page 2 of 2