Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00845/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00845-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Henry Raymond Joseph Perez seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil 

rights while confined at the Kern County AES Center. (See generally Doc. 1.) However, Plaintiff did 

not pay the Court’s filing fee or submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. (See 

Doc. 6.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the Court dismiss the action without prejudice 

for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee. (Doc. 7.)

The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any 

objections were due within 30 days. (Doc. 7 at 2.) The Court advised the “failure to file objections 

within the specified time may result in the waiver of the rights on appeal.” (Id., quoting Wilkerson v. 

Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) In addition, the Court informed Plaintiff that if he 

filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee, the Findings and 

Recommendations would be vacated. (Id.) Plaintiff did not file objections, file an IFP application, or 

pay the filing fee; and the time to do so has passed. 

HENRY RAYMOND JOSEPH PEREZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

HEATHER DIAZ, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:24-cv-0845 JLT EPG

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 

ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND 

DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE 

THIS CASE

(Doc. 7)

Case 1:24-cv-00845-JLT-EPG Document 8 Filed 12/06/24 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. 

Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are 

supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on October 16, 2024 (Doc. 7) are 

ADOPTED in full.

2. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s pay the filing fee.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 6, 2024 

Case 1:24-cv-00845-JLT-EPG Document 8 Filed 12/06/24 Page 2 of 2