Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01242/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01242-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD D. DAVIS, III,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-11-1242 KJM DAD PS

vs.

FOLSOM CORDOVA UNIFIED

SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,

ORDER

Defendants.

 /

Defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint is set for

hearing on August 26, 2011. The pro se plaintiff has filed a motion to amend his first amended

complaint and has attempted to notice the motion for hearing concurrently with defendants’

motion to dismiss.

The court declines to permit further amendment of plaintiff’s pleading until the

court has heard defendants’ motion and determined whether the first amended complaint should

be dismissed and, if so, whether leave to amend should be granted. If leave to amend is granted,

the court will provide plaintiff with guidelines he must follow. It would serve no purpose to

permit plaintiff to amend his complaint a second time without guidance from the court.

/////

/////

Case 2:11-cv-01242-KJM-DAD Document 26 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to amend his first amended complaint (Doc. No. 22) is

denied without prejudice to argument concerning leave to amend at the hearing of defendants’

motion to dismiss; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion to amend will not be placed on the court’s August 26, 2011

law and motion calendar.

DATED: August 19, 2011.

DAD:kw

Ddad1\orders.prose\davis1242.mta.den

Case 2:11-cv-01242-KJM-DAD Document 26 Filed 08/19/11 Page 2 of 2