Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00534/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00534-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD A. LOVE, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

DR. KIM, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00534-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 18)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

COMPLAINT IN ITS ENTIRETY

(Doc. 17)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Richard A. Love (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 10, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation that recommended this action be dismissed for

plaintiff’s failure to state a claim. The Findings and

Recommendation were served on plaintiff and contained notice to

plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation

were to be filed on or before May 10, 2007. To date, plaintiff

has not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendation.

Case 1:05-cv-00534-AWI-DLB Document 20 Filed 06/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed April 10, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed March 20, 2006, is

DISMISSED in its entirety; and,

3. This action is therefore DISMISSED for failure to state

a claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 13, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00534-AWI-DLB Document 20 Filed 06/14/07 Page 2 of 2