Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02024/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02024-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

JENNER & BLOCK LLP

Brian Hauck (Cal. Bar No. 303058)

bhauck@jenner.com

633 West 5th Street, Suite 3600

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 239-5100

Facsimile: (213) 239-5199

Attorneys for Defendant Juan Perez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHAUNCEY MAHAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JUAN PEREZ, et al.

Defendant.

Case No. 3:16-cv-02024-JST

The Hon. Jon S. Tigar

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 

TO DISMISS

Hearing Date: November 3, 2016

Time: 2:00 pm.

Courtroom: 9 (19th Floor)

Current Due Date: October 10, 2016

New Due Date: October 14, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-02024-JST Document 105 Filed 10/06/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

STIPULATION

WHEREAS:

(1) Defendant Juan Perez filed a Motion to Dismiss on September 12, 2016, Plaintiff 

Chauncey Mahan filed his Opposition on October 3, 2016, and Mr. Perez’s reply 

brief is currently due on October 10, 2016;

(2) On October 6, 2016, Mr. Perez’s counsel learned that the primary associate on 

this matter had a medical emergency that rendered him unable to work on this 

matter, or any other matter, for an indeterminate amount of time;

(3) After learning of this medical emergency, Mr. Perez’s counsel immediately 

contacted Mr. Mahan and asked for an extension of time of four days, from 

October 10, 2016 until October 14, 2016, to file his reply brief;

(4) Mr. Mahan agreed to Mr. Perez’s requested extension;

(5) The agreed-upon extension will not have any effect on the scheduling of the 

hearing on the motion, which is scheduled for November 3, 2016;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant Juan Perez’s

Reply in support of his Motion to Dismiss shall be due on October 14, 2016. 

(signatures on following page)

Case 3:16-cv-02024-JST Document 105 Filed 10/06/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

DATED: October 6, 2016 JENNER & BLOCK LLP

By: /s/ Brian Hauck

 Brian Hauck

Pro Se Plaintiff

DATED: October 6, 2016 CHAUNCEY MAHAN

By: /s/ Chauncey M. Mahan 

 Chauncey Mahan

Pro Se Plaintiff

PURUSANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2016 ____________________________________

 The Honorable Jon S. Tigar

 United States District Judge 

ATTESTATION

I, Brian Hauck, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this

Stipulation to Extend Time to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss. In compliance with 

Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from signatory Chauncey Mahan. 

October 6

Case 3:16-cv-02024-JST Document 105 Filed 10/06/16 Page 3 of 3