Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00907/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00907-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAYLA SUGGETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

SOLANO COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER,

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00907-TLN-JDP 

ORDER

Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 16, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time to file objections 

has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 

magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 

Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 

the record and by the proper analysis.

Case 2:23-cv-00907-TLN-JDP Document 15 Filed 02/20/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 16, 2024 (ECF No. 11) are 

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This case will proceed on Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claims for inadequate 

medical care against Defendants Wong, Solano County, and Wellpath Medical; 

3. All other claims are DISMISSED; and

4. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 

proceedings.

Date: February 19, 2024

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge

Case 2:23-cv-00907-TLN-JDP Document 15 Filed 02/20/24 Page 2 of 2