Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03615/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03615-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1

STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DATE OF MEDIATION

McKAY, BURTON & THURMAN

Bruce J. Boehm (Cal. Bar No. 186715)

170 South Main Street, Suite 800

Salt Lake City, Utah 84101

Telephone: (801) 521-4135

Facsimile: (801) 521-4252

E-mail: bruce@mbt-law.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Harman - Chiu, Inc. and Harman Management Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

SANDRA VARGAS, ESTHER HERNANDEZ,

AND MARIVEL HERNANDEZ

Plaintiffs/Intervenors

v.

HARMAN – CHIU, INC., d/b/a/

KFC / TACO BELL, HARMAN

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, INC.,

JORGE GARCIA, AND DOES 1-10 inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 05 3615

STIPULATED MOTION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND

DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING

MEDIATION

Harman – Chiu, Inc. and Harman Management Corporation (“the Defendants”), the

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“the Plaintiff”), and Sandra Vargas, Esther

Hernandez, and Marivel Hernandez (“the Plaintiffs/Intervenors”), by and through their counsel,

hereby stipulate and recite the following:

1. The deadline for completing the mediation is currently April 4, 2006.

2. The Defendants believe that additional discovery is necessary before the parties

proceed to mediation. Specifically, the Defendants wish to depose the Plaintiffs/Intervenors.

**E-filed 4/6/06**

Case 5:05-cv-03615-JF Document 31 Filed 04/06/06 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2

STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DATE OF MEDIATION

Scheduling conflicts have prevented the Defendants from completing the necessary discovery

prior to April 4, 2006.

3. The parties have agreed that, with the Court’s approval, the date for the mediation

should be extended sixty (60) days to allow for additional discovery and completion of the

mediation.

4. This request is not sought for purposes of delay.

5. No previous time modifications by stipulation, or by the Court, have been made in

this case.

6. The extension of time for mediation should have no effect on the schedule for the

case.

7. The parties have scheduled May 3, 2006 as the new date for the mediation, and

the mediator has indicated she is available that date.

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED that the deadline for completing mediation, should

be extended sixty (60) days to allow for additional discovery and completion of the mediation,

subject to the Court’s approval.

DATED this ____ day of ___________, 2006.

McKAY, BURTON & THURMAN

/ss/ /

Bruce J. Boehm

Attorneys for the Defendants

DATED this ____ day of ___________, 2006.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION

/ss/ /

Attorneys for the Plaintiff

DATED this ____ day of ___________, 2006.

Case 5:05-cv-03615-JF Document 31 Filed 04/06/06 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3

STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DATE OF MEDIATION

TALAMANTES VILLEGAS CARRERA, LLP

/ss/ /

Attorneys for the Plaintiffs/Intervenors

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this _____ day of ____________, 2006.

___________________________________

The Honorable Judge Jeremy Fogel

United States District Court for the Northern

District of California

4th April

Case 5:05-cv-03615-JF Document 31 Filed 04/06/06 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4

STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DATE OF MEDIATION

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF UTAH )

) ss

COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )

I am a resident of the State of Utah, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the

within action. My business address is McKay Burton & Thurman, 170 S. Main, Suite 800, Salt

Lake City, Utah 84101. On April, 3

rd, 2006 I served the within documents:

STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DATE OF

MEDIATION



I sent such document from facsimile machine (801) 521-4252. I certify that said

transmission was completed and that all pages were received and that a report was

generated by facsimile machine (801) 521-4252 which confirms said transmission and

receipt. I, thereafter, mailed a copy to the interested party(ies) in this action by

placing a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelope(s) addressed to the parties

listed below.



by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon

fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Salt Lake City, Utah addressed as set forth

below.



by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the

address(es) set forth below.



by placing the document(s) listed above, together with an unsigned copy of this

declaration, in a sealed Federal Express envelope with postage paid on account and

deposited with Federal Express at Salt Lake City, Utah addressed as set forth below.



by transmitting the document(s) listed above, electronically, via the e-mail addresses

set forth below.

William R. Tamayo

Jonathan T. Peck

Evangelina Fierro Hernandez

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

San Francisco District Office

350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500

San Francisco, California 94105

Virginia Villegas

Jennifer Reisch

TALAMANTES/VILLEGAS/CARRERA, LLP

1550 Bryan Street, Suite 725

San Francisco, CA 94103

Case 5:05-cv-03615-JF Document 31 Filed 04/06/06 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5

STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DATE OF MEDIATION

Kristin W. Maloney

14 Sunrise Hill Road

Orinda, CA 94563

Tel: (925) 254-6786

Fax: (925) 253-8226

Alternative Dispute Resolution Program

United States District Court

Northern District of California

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94103

Tel: 415-522-2199

Fax: 415-522-4221

I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence

for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same

day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on

motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage

meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above

is true and correct.

Executed on April 3, 2006, at Salt Lake City, Utah.

___/ss/________________

Antoinette Gard-Moore,

Assistant to Mr. Boehm

Case 5:05-cv-03615-JF Document 31 Filed 04/06/06 Page 5 of 5