Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02233/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02233-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING 

PRELIMINARY SETTLEMENT HEARING

C-05-02233 CRB 

2919029_1.DOC 

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838 

STEVEN D. GUGGENHEIM, State Bar No. 201386 

CAZ HASHEMI, State Bar No. 210239 

CAMERON P. HOFFMAN, State Bar No. 229316 

MARK T. OAKES, State Bar No. 234598 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Email: moakes@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MICHAEL KLAYKO, SETH NEIMAN, 

NEAL DEMPSEY, CHRISTOPHER PAISLEY, 

DAVID HOUSE, NICHOLAS MOORE, L. 

WILLIAM KRAUSE, SANJAY VASWANI, 

ROBERT WALKER AND BROCADE 

COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C05-02233 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING 

PRELIMINARY SETTLEMENT 

HEARING 

Case 3:05-cv-02233-CRB Document 104 Filed 07/20/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING 

PRELIMINARY SETTLEMENT HEARING

C-05-02233 CRB 

-1- 2919029_1.DOC 

WHEREAS, this is a consolidated shareholder derivative action brought on behalf of 

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (“Brocade”) against certain officers and directors of 

Brocade; 

WHEREAS, a settlement has been reached and a preliminary settlement hearing is 

currently scheduled for July 21, 2006 at 10:00 a.m.; 

WHEREAS, Andrew Roth, who is a plaintiff in an action entitled Roth, derivatively on 

behalf of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. v. Reyes, et al, Case No. C-06-2786 CRB, has 

written a letter to the Court regarding a potential objection to the proposed settlement; 

WHEREAS, the parties believe they may be able to resolve the potential objection to the 

proposed settlement without the Court’s intervention, but will not be able to do so by July 21, 

2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, to continue 

the preliminary settlement hearing until August 4, 2006 at 10:00 a.m., or such other date and 

time that the Court deems appropriate; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, 

subject to approval of the Court, that the preliminary settlement hearing shall be continued until 

August 4, 2006 at 10:00 a.m., or such other date and time that the Court deems appropriate. 

Dated: July 19, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Mark T. Oakes 

Mark T. Oakes 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Michael Klayko, Seth Neiman, Neal Dempsey, 

Christopher Paisley, David House, Nicholas 

Moore, L. William Krause, Sanjay Vaswani, 

Robert Walker and Brocade Communications 

Systems, Inc. 

Case 3:05-cv-02233-CRB Document 104 Filed 07/20/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING 

PRELIMINARY SETTLEMENT HEARING

C-05-02233 CRB 

-2- 2919029_1.DOC 

Dated: July 19, 2006 FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP 

By: /s/ Mark T. Oakes 

Adam Gonnelli 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

* * * * * 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the preliminary settlement 

hearing is continued until August 4, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________________ _______________________________ 

THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

United States District Judge 

July 20, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02233-CRB Document 104 Filed 07/20/06 Page 3 of 3