Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01864/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01864-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NANCY FLORES,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendant. /

No. C 04-1864 MMC (MEJ)

ORDER RE: WRITTEN FEE

AGREEMENT

On September 9, 2005, the parties in the above-captioned matter appeared before the

undersigned, at which time the matter settled. The Court is now in receipt of Plaintiff's letter

regarding the amount of the settlement retained by her counsel. Plaintiff's counsel has also filed a

response to Plaintiff's letter, and the Court conducted an in camera review of the written fee

agreement between Plaintiff and her attorney. Upon review of the fee agreement, the Court finds

that Plaintiff's attorney actually received less than that to which he was entitled under the fee

agreement. Accordingly, the Court finds no basis for Plaintiff's dispute. Further, as this is a

contractual matter between Plaintiff and her attorney, this Court has no jurisdiction over the dispute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 3, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-01864-MMC Document 49 Filed 04/03/06 Page 1 of 1