Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05079/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05079-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HUNG DUONG NGUON,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. CLARK, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 04 5079 AWI SMS P 

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

APPROPRIATE AND FORWARDING

DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF 

 Hung Duong Nguon (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It appearing the Complaint

states a cognizable claim for relief under the Eighth Amendment claim for failure to protect

against Defendants Clark, Rainey and McKain,, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

C/O M. CLARK

C/O S. RAINEY (or RAYNI)

C/O McKain

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff THREE USM-285 forms, THREE

summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the complaint filed December 17, 2003. 

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff SHALL

complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the

Case 1:04-cv-05079-LJO -SMS Document 15 Filed 06/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

completed Notice to the Court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each Defendant listed above; and 

c. FOUR (4) copies of the endorsed complaint filed December 17, 2003.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the Court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05079-LJO -SMS Document 15 Filed 06/01/05 Page 2 of 2