Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05171/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05171-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

DANNY LEON STEWART PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-5171

SHERIFF TIM HELDER;

DR. HOWARD; NURSE 

RHONDA BRADLEY; and

NURSE SUSAN JOHNSON DEFENDANTS

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Danny Leon Stewart filed this civil rights action on September 15, 2006. He proceeds

pro se and in forma pauperis. 

When he filed the action, plaintiff was incarcerated at the Washington County Detention

Center (Doc. 1). According to information available on the Arkansas JusticeXchange website,

www.justicexchange.com, plaintiff was released from the detention center on November 4, 2006.

Plaintiff did not inform the court of the change in his address. The court obtained the home

address he provided the detention center upon being booked in and utilizing this address entered

a change of address on the plaintiff’s behalf (Doc. 12).

On January 15, 2007, the defendants’ filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 13). In their

motion, defendants indicate plaintiff has failed to respond to the discovery requests. Defendants

indicate they have been unable to correspond with the plaintiff regarding his past due discovery

responses because all mail sent to the plaintiff first at the Washington County Detention Center

and then at the address entered as a change of address on January 4, 2007 (Doc. 12) has been

returned as undeliverable.

Case 5:06-cv-05171-JLH Document 17 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

A show cause order was then entered (Doc. 16) giving plaintiff until February 5, 2007,

to show cause why this action should not be dismissed based on his failure to comply with an

order of this court and his failure to prosecute this action. No response to the show cause order

has been made. Plaintiff has not communicated with the court in anyway. 

I therefore recommend that this case be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to obey the

orders of the court and his failure to prosecute this action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. The parties have

ten days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which to file written objections

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver

of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that objections must be

both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court.

DATED this 13th day of February 2007.

/s/ J. Marschewski 

HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-05171-JLH Document 17 Filed 02/13/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>