Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00356/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00356-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARDEROSIAN, 

RUNYON, CERCONE, 

LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721 1

Michael G. Marderosian, No. 77296

Jacob J. Rivas, No. 208504

MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE,

 LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, California 93721

Telephone: (559) 441-7991

Facsimile: (559) 441-8170

Attorneys for: Defendants CITY OF FRESNO, N. ROBEY (F.P.D. Badge No. P1303), CAMPOS

(F.P.D. Badge No. 1067), LOPEZ (F.P.D. Badge No. 1309), M. GEBHART (F.P.D. Badge

No. 1245), EDROZO (F.P.D. Badge No. 1111), A. ROBLES (F.P.D. No. 5142), GOMEZ

(F.P.D. Badge No. UNK), D. LAMBERT (F.P.D. Badge No. P742), In their Official

Capacities, and in their Individual Capacities

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALENCIA ANN THOMPSON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF FRESNO, N. ROBEY (F.P.D.

Badge No. P1303), CAMPOS (F.P.D. Badge

No. 1067), LOPEZ (F.P.D. Badge No. 1309),

M. GEBHART (F.P.D. Badge No. 1245),

EDROZO (F.P.D. Badge No. 1111), A.

ROBLES (F.P.D. No. 5142), GOMEZ

(F.P.D. Badge No. UNK), D. LAMBERT

(F.P.D. Badge No. P742), In their Official

Capacities, and in their Individual Capacities,

and DOES 1 through 50,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case Number 1:06-CV-00356-AWI-LJO

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR

DAMAGES; ORDER.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties herein, by and through

their respective attorneys of record:

1. Defendant City of Fresno was served with the Complaint for Damages on June 30, 

2006, resulting in a due date for the filing of a responsive pleading no later than July 20, 2006;

2. Plaintiff has not effectuated personal service of the Complaint for Damages upon the

individually named defendant police officers as of the date of this stipulation;

Case 1:06-cv-00356-LJO-GSA Document 12 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARDEROSIAN, 

RUNYON, CERCONE, 

LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721 2

3. Plaintiff is in the process of effectuating personal service upon the individually named

defendant police officers;

4. Service of the defendants with the Complaint for Damages on different dates has and

will result in varying deadlines for the filing of a responsive pleading on behalf of the respective

defendants;

5. The parties desire to avoid different deadlines for the filing of responsive pleadings by

defendants;

6. The parties further desire to avoid the filing ofmultiple responsive pleadings on behalf

of defendants to the Complaint for Damages;

7. The time for filing a responsive pleading by defendant City of Fresno, including a

Motion to Dismiss or Answer, shall be extended to the same date for filing a responsive pleading by

the individually named defendant police officers, or twenty days subsequent to the service of said

officers.

The stipulation herein is entered into pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 6-144.

DATED: July, 18, 2006 NUTTALL & COLEMAN

/s/ Wesley E. Stupar, Esq.

By: __________________________

WESLEY E. STUPAR,

Attorney for Plaintiff

DATED: July 18, 2006 MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE,

 LEHMAN & ARMO

/s/ Michael G. Marderosian, Esq.

By: _______________________________

MICHAEL G. MARDEROSIAN,

Attorney for Defendants

Case 1:06-cv-00356-LJO-GSA Document 12 Filed 07/19/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARDEROSIAN, 

RUNYON, CERCONE, 

LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721 3

ORDER

The stipulation of the parties having been read and considered by the Court, and good cause

appearing therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for filing a responsive pleading by defendant City

of Fresno, including a Motion to Dismiss or Answer, shall be extended to the same date for filing a

responsive pleading by the individually named defendant police officers, or twenty days subsequent

to the service of the Complaint for Damages on said officers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 19, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00356-LJO-GSA Document 12 Filed 07/19/06 Page 3 of 3