Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03729/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03729-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Attorney 

DAVID B. NEWDORF, State Bar #172960

ROBERT A. BONTA, State Bar #202668

Deputy City Attorneys 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3892 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALEXIS BRONSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, JAMES C. DOYLE, AND 

DOES 1 TO 10 INCLUSIVE, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 04-3729 CRB 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF 

FEDERAL CLAIMS WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO REMAND 

Plaintiff ALEXIS BRONSON and defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

RANCISCO, through their respective counsel, STIPULATE and AGREE as follows: 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) all federal claims asserted by plaintiff in this action are 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and that plaintiff’s state law claims in his Second Amended 

Complaint shall be remanded to the California Superior Court for San Francisco County. 

 1 

STIP & ORDER OF DISMISSAL/ REMAND NO. C 04-3729____________ N:\LIT\LI2004\041743\00365508.DOC 

Case 3:04-cv-03729-CRB Document 19 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED AND AGREED: 

Dated: April 16, 2006 CARDOZA LAW OFFICES 

By:___________/s/______________ 

 Jai Gohel 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 ALEXIS BRONSON 

DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER 

Chief Trial Deputy 

DAVID B. NEWDORF 

Deputy City Attorney 

By:_____________/s/__________________ 

 David B. Newdorf 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Pursuant to stipulation and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all 

federal claims asserted by plaintiff against defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims and 

REMANDS said claims to the California Superior Court for the City and County of San 

Francisco. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: ______________ 

_________________________________ 

 Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

 United States District Judge 

 2 

STIP & ORDER OF DISMISSAL/ REMAND NO. C 04-3729____________ N:\LIT\LI2004\041743\00365508.DOC 

April 17, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-03729-CRB Document 19 Filed 04/18/06 Page 2 of 2