Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-md-01699/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-md-01699-689/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX

MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,

 /

This document relates to:

Joel Wood, Aritha Marshall, Earl

Sanders, and Patricia Steele,

06-6127 CRB

___________________________________/

No. MDL 05-01699 CRB

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL AND

DISMISSING ACTION FOR A

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

On June 4, 2007, the Court issued Orders To Show Cause directing plaintiffs Joel

Wood, Aritha Marshall, Earl Sanders, and Patricia Steele to show cause as to why (1) their

counsel’s motion to withdraw should not be granted; and (2) plaintiffs’ claims should not be

dismissed for a lack of prosecution. In particular, the Court directed plaintiffs to notify the

Court in writing on or before June 22, 2007 of the reasons the withdrawal should not be

granted or the case dismissed if plaintiffs wished to contest either action. As of the date of

this Order, none of the plaintiffs has responded to the Court’s June 4, 2007 Order and none

has otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ counsel’s motions to 

//

//

Case 3:05-md-01699-CRB Document 1537 Filed 07/10/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\showcauseorders\woodetaldismiss.wpd 2

withdraw are GRANTED and plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed with prejudice for a failure to

prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 10, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-md-01699-CRB Document 1537 Filed 07/10/07 Page 2 of 2