Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00505/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00505-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend the Court’s 

Deadline for Plaintiff to Accept or Deny the Remittitur 

COSBY v. AUTOZONE, INC. et al. 

Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. 

BOHM LAW GROUP

LAWRANCE A. BOHM, (SBN 208716)

BOHM LAW GROUP 

4600 Northgate Blvd. Ste 210 

Sacramento, CA 95834 

Telephone: (916) 927-5574 

Facsimile: (916) 927-2046 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

RANDY COSBY 

RICHARD R. GRAY, Bar No. 071030 

BARBARA A. BLACKBURN, Bar No. 253731 

LITTLER MENDELSON 

A Professional Corporation 

500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: 916.830.7200 

Fax No.: 916.561.0828 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AUTOZONE, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RANDY COSBY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AUTOZONE INC., JIM KULBACKI and DOES 

1-100, inclusive, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:08-CV-00505-LKK-DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND THE COURT’S DEADLINE 

FOR PLAINTIFF TO ACCEPT OR 

DENY THE REMITTITUR 

/// 

Case 2:08-cv-00505-KJM-DAD Document 195 Filed 06/28/12 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend the Court’s 

Deadline for Plaintiff to Accept or Deny the Remittitur 

COSBY v. AUTOZONE, INC. et al. 

Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. 

BOHM LAW GROUP

Plaintiff RANDY COSBY and Defendant AUTOZONE, INC., hereby stipulate and 

request through their attorneys of record that Plaintiff’s current deadline of July 2, 2012 to inform 

the Court in writing if he (1) consents to the remitted damage award, (2) seeks a new trial, or (3) 

plans to appeal the remittitur, be extended ten (10) days after Defendant’s pending appeal (case 

number 12-15281 in the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit) is concluded. 

Dated: 6/27/12 By: /s/ Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. LAWRANCE A. BOHM, ESQ. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

RANDY COSBY 

Dated: 6/27/12 By: /s/ Richard R. Gray, Esq. RICHARD R. GRAY, ESQ. 

 LITTLER MENDELSON 

 A Professional Corporation 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 AUTOZONE 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 28, 2012. 

Case 2:08-cv-00505-KJM-DAD Document 195 Filed 06/28/12 Page 2 of 2