Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-03518/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-03518-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CERTIFY ORDER FOR INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW NO. 3:08-CV-3518 MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICES OF RONALD JASON PALMIERI, P.C. Ronald Jason Palmieri (CA Bar No. 96953) 

1644 North Orange Grove Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90046 

TELEPHONE: (323) 882-8225 FACSIMILE: (323) 882-8208 lawofcsrjp@aol.com

WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP

Carole E. Handler (CA Bar No. 129381) 

9665 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 200 

Beverly Hills, CA 90212 

TELEPHONE: (310) 860-8705 FACSIMILE: (310) 860-3805 handler@wildman.com

WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP

Peter N. Moore (admitted pro hac vice) 225 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2800 

Chicago, IL 60606-1229 

TELEPHONE: (312) 201-2000 FACSIMILE: (312) 201-2555 pmoore@wildman.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

REUNION.COM, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

VIOLETTA HOANG, LIVIA HSIAO, and

MICHAEL BLACKSBURG, and MATTHEW

HALL, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v.

REUNION.COM, INC., a California corporation,

 Defendant. 

No. 3:08-cv-3518 MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CERTIFY 

MARCH 31, 2010 ORDER FOR

INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW PURSUANT TO 

28 U.S.C. § 1292(B)

Date: June 4, 2010 

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Maxine Chesney Courtroom 7 (19th Floor) 

Case 3:08-cv-03518-MMC Document 130 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CERTIFY ORDER FOR INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW NO. 3:08-CV-3518 MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order

Having reviewed Defendant’s Motion to Certify the Court’s March 31, 2010 

Order for Interlocutory Review Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), the parties’ 

respective memoranda of law, any and all supporting documents, and all other related 

documents in the Court’s file, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for 

reasons set forth in Defendant’s memoranda and hereby ORDERS as follows: 

The Court’s March 31, 2010 Order Reconsidering and Vacating in Part 

December 23 Order; Denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended 

Complaint; Setting Case Management Conference (Docket No. 107) (the “March 31, 

2010 Order”) involves controlling questions of law as to which there is substantial 

ground for difference of opinion and an immediate appeal from the order may 

materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation and thus the March 31, 

2010 Order is hereby certified for interlocutory review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1292(b).

Dated: ________________ _________________________________

 Maxine M. Chesney 

 United States District Judge 

2071008 

June 9, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-03518-MMC Document 130 Filed 06/09/10 Page 2 of 2