Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00642/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00642-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY E. WALKER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0642 WBS KJM P

vs.

A.H. WHITTEN, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed February 8, 2010, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

return to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on

defendant E. Moore. That sixty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in

any way to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant E. Moore be dismissed from

this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

1

Case 2:09-cv-00642-WBS-CKD Document 24 Filed 04/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 15, 2010. 

walk0642.fusm

2

Case 2:09-cv-00642-WBS-CKD Document 24 Filed 04/16/10 Page 2 of 2