Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04146/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04146-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS (IMPROPER VENUE) CASE NO. C 05 4146 MMC 

SFCA_376428.2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARIAH HANSON, AN INDIVIDUAL, MT

PRODUCTIONS, INC., A CALIFORNIA 

CORPORATION, AND MARIAH HANSON

DBA CLUB SKIRTS AND MT

PRODUCTIONS

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

GIRL BAR, INC., A CALIFORNIA 

CORPORATION, GB PRODUCTIONS, A 

CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ROBIN

GANS, AN INDIVIDUAL, SANDY SACHS,

AN INDIVIDUAL,

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 05 4146 MMC 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS OR 

TRANSFER (ON GROUNDS OF 

IMPROPER VENUE) 

CASE FILED: OCTOBER 13, 2005

JUDGE: HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:05-cv-04146-MMC Document 97 Filed 12/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS (IMPROPER VENUE) CASE NO. C 05 4146 MMC 

SFCA_376428.2 

The Motion to Dismiss or Transfer (On Grounds of Improper Venue) (the 

“Motion”), filed by Defendants GIRL BAR, INC., GB PRODUCTIONS, ROBIN GANS,

AND SANDY SACHS (collectively “Defendants”), came on for hearing before the above 

captioned Court, on December 20, 2005 with Eileen R. Ridley and Michael A. Naranjo of 

Foley & Lardner LLP and Jennifer J. Hagan of the Hagan Law Firm appearing on behalf 

Plaintiffs MARIAH HANSON, MT PRODUCTIONS, INC., AND MARIAH HANSON

DBA CLUB SKIRTS AND MT PRODUCTIONS (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Valerie F. 

Horn of Valerie F. Horn & Associates, APLC appearing on behalf of Defendants. 

The Court, having considered the pleadings in this matter as well as all papers 

submitted in support of, and in opposition to, said motion, and having heard the argument 

of counsel and good cause appearing - hereby DENIES the Motion in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: December 30, 2005 

__________________________________

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE – NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:05-cv-04146-MMC Document 97 Filed 12/30/05 Page 2 of 2