Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-04063/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-04063-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. CV01-4063 VRW 

-1- C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\RL2\2866768_1.DOC 

MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 64307 

JAMES C. YOON, State Bar No. 177155 

MICHAEL A. BERTA, State Bar No. 194650 

ARIANA M. CHUNG-HAN, State Bar No. 197572 

KRISHNA K. JUVVADI, State Bar No. 221493 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANDISK CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SANDISK CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MEMOREX PRODUCTS, INC., a California 

corporation, formerly d/b/a MEMTEC 

PRODUCTS, INC., a California corporation; 

PRETEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a 

California corporation; and RITEK 

CORPORATION, a Taiwanese corporation. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: CV 01-4063 VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO HOLD THE MARKMAN

HEARING AND ORAL ARGUMENT 

ON SANDISK’S MOTION TO 

STRIKE ON AUGUST 16, 2006 

Case 3:01-cv-04063-VRW Document 408 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. CV01-4063 VRW 

-2- C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\RL2\2866768_1.DOC 

WHEREAS, in a April 4, 2006 email, this Court notified counsel for SanDisk 

Corporation (“SanDisk”) that Judge Walker was unavailable on May 12, 2006 for the Claim 

Construction Hearing (“Markman Hearing”) and oral argument on SanDisk’s Motion to Strike 

Defendants’ Addition of New Claim Terms and New Claim Constructions (“Motion to Strike”); 

WHEREAS, counsel for SanDisk forwarded the Court’s April 4th Notice to counsel for 

Defendants Memorex Products, Inc. (“Memorex”), Pretec Electronics Corporation (“Pretec”), 

and Ritek Corporation (“Ritek”); 

WHEREAS, the parties have reached a stipulation for a new hearing date; 

The parties, pursuant to a stipulation, hereby respectfully request that the Markman

Hearing and oral argument on SanDisk’s Motion to Strike be held on August 16, 2006. 

Dated: April 26, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Krishna K. Juvvadi 

 Krishna K. Juvvadi 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANDISK CORPORATION 

Dated: April 26, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ Charles H. Sanders 

 Charles H. Sanders 

 

Attorneys for Defendant 

RITEK CORPORATION 

Dated: April 26, 2006 MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C. 

By: /s/ Jeremy M. Duggan 

 Jeremy M. Duggan Attorneys for Defendant 

PRETEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 

Case 3:01-cv-04063-VRW Document 408 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. CV01-4063 VRW 

-3- C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\RL2\2866768_1.DOC 

Dated: April 26, 2006 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 

By: /s/ Jon B. Streeter 

 Jon B. Streeter Attorneys for Defendant 

MEMOREX PRODUCTS, INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

By: 

 THE HONORABLE VAUGHN R. WALKER 

 CHIEF JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:01-cv-04063-VRW Document 408 Filed 05/19/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. CV01-4063 VRW 

-4- C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\RL2\2866768_1.DOC 

I, Krishna K. Juvvadi, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being 

used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Hold the Markman Hearing and SanDisk’s 

Motion to Strike on August 16, 2006. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest 

that Charles H. Sanders, Jeremy M. Duggan and Jon B. Streeter have concurred in this filing. 

Dated: April 26, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Krishna K. Juvvadi 

 Krishna K. Juvvadi 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANDISK CORPORATION 

Case 3:01-cv-04063-VRW Document 408 Filed 05/19/06 Page 4 of 4