Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02396/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02396-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTHONY ARCEO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SOCORRO SALINAS, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:11-cv-2396 MCE KJN P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. On March 18, 2016, the 

undersigned recommended that this action proceed on his retaliation claims against defendants 

Surjick, Kong, Adams, and McHugh for their actions in February of 2012; and defendant Savage 

based on his actions in September of 2012, and that the remaining claims against the remaining 

defendants be dismissed. On April 22, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for stay, asking the court not 

to process the service of process documents until the district court reviewed plaintiff’s objections 

and the findings and recommendations. 

 Plaintiff did not file objections.1

 On May 5, 2016, the district court adopted the findings 

and recommendations. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion for stay is now moot, and is denied without 

prejudice. By separate order, the court will direct the U.S. Marshal to serve process. 

 

1

 Plaintiff’s motion for stay states that his objections would be filed separately. (ECF No. 29.) 

Case 2:11-cv-02396-MCE-KJN Document 33 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to stay (ECF No. 29) is 

denied as moot. 

 Dated: May 6, 2016 

/cw/arce2396.den 

Case 2:11-cv-02396-MCE-KJN Document 33 Filed 05/06/16 Page 2 of 2