Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01650/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01650-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

PROPOSED FORM OF JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 14-CV-1650-YGR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

BLUE SPIKE, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-01650 (YGR) 

[PROPOSED FORM OF] JUDGMENT 

INVALIDATING ASSERTED PATENTS 

PURSUANT TO DKT. NOS. 75, 80

Hearing Date: N/A

Hearing Time: N/A

Courtroom: Courtroom 1, 4th Floor

Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

This action having come before the Court, and pursuant to the Court’s Orders: (1) granting 

Defendant Google Inc.’s (“Google”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. Nos. 59, 75); and 

(2) accepting Plaintiff Blue Spike, LLC’s (“Blue Spike”) Statement of Non-objection (Dkt. No. 77) 

in response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause (Dkt. Nos. 76, 80) – together which find all asserted 

claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,346,472 (the “’472 Patent”), 7,660,700 (the “’700 Patent”), 7,949,494 

(the “’494 Patent”), 8,214,175 (the “’175 Patent”), and 8,712,728 (the “’728 Patent”) (collectively, 

the “Patents-In-Suit”) invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101 – IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND 

ORDERED that:

1. For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order on September 8, 2015 (Dkt. No. 75), 

the following asserted claims are invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101:

 claims 1-4, 8, and 11 of the ’472 Patent;

 claims 1, 10-12, 18, 21, 27, 40, and 51 of the ’700 Patent;

 claims 11, 15, 17, and 29 of the ’494 Patent; 

 claims 1, 8, 11, 12, 16, and 17 of the ’175 Patent; and 

 claims 1, 4, 5, 16, 25, and 26 of the ’728 Patent.

2. For the same reasons set for in the Court’s Order from September 8, 2015 (Dkt. No. 

75) and pursuant to the Court’s Order from September 18, 2015 (Dkt. No. 80), the following 

asserted claim is also invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101:

 claim 30 of the ’728 Patent.

Case 4:14-cv-01650-YGR Document 83 Filed 10/01/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 

PROPOSED FORM OF JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 14-CV-1650-YGR 

3. The foregoing claims of the Patents-In-Suit represent all pending claims at issue in 

this case. 

4. WHEREFORE JUDGMENT on the pleadings is entered in this case in favor of 

Defendant Google and against Plaintiff Blue Spike. 

Dated: 2FWREHU 2015 By: _______________________________

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

United States District Judge

Case 4:14-cv-01650-YGR Document 83 Filed 10/01/15 Page 2 of 2