Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02040/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02040-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DIRK JAONG BOUIE, JR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

OSCAR SMITH, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:18-cv-2040 KJM AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff has filed a motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file a response to 

defendants’ motion for summary judgment and motion for stay of discovery. ECF No. 47. The 

motion will be granted as to the time respond to the motion for summary judgment. However, the 

motion to stay discovery has already been granted and the request for an extension of time to 

respond to that motion will therefore be denied as moot. If plaintiff wishes to conduct discovery 

on any matter other than exhaustion while the motion for summary judgment is pending, he 

should file a motion that includes a copy of the discovery requests he wants to serve and that 

explains why the requests cannot wait until after the resolution of the motion for summary 

judgment. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file responses, ECF No. 47, is 

GRANTED as to defendants’ motion for summary judgment and DENIED as moot with respect 

to defendants’ motion to stay discovery. 

Case 2:18-cv-02040-DC-AC Document 48 Filed 04/12/21 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 2. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the service of this order to file his response to 

defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 

DATED: April 12, 2021 

Case 2:18-cv-02040-DC-AC Document 48 Filed 04/12/21 Page 2 of 2