Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01200/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01200-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY P. PUCKETT,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-1200 FCD CMK P

vs.

T. FELKER, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

On August 3, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed June 9, 2006, denying appointment of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule

72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to

law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate

judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed June 9, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED:September 6, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01200-RJB Document 17 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 1