Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05309/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05309-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY JAMES LUGO,

Plaintiff, CV F 03 5309 OWW WMW P

 vs.

DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER RE FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS (#21)

 

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 25, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff

has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the findings and

Case 1:03-cv-05309-OWW -WMW Document 23 Filed 10/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's

responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local

Rule 83-182(d), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 25, 2006, are adopted in

full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The

Clerk is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 3, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05309-OWW -WMW Document 23 Filed 10/04/06 Page 2 of 2