Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262-42/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099

tboutrous@gibsondunn.com

THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570

tevangelis@gibsondunn.com

DHANANJAY MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN 254433

dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com

333 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197

Telephone: 213.229.7000

Facsimile: 213.229.7520

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557

jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289

kringdowell@gibsondunn.com

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921

Telephone: 415.393.8200

Facsimile: 415.393.8306

Attorneys for Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC,

and Travis Kalanick

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, SBN 245998

aspurchise@littler.com

900 Third Ave.

New York, NY 10022

Tel: 212.583.9600

Fax: 212.832.2719

ROD FLIEGEL, SBN 168289

rfliegel@littler.com

333 Bush Street, 34th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel: 415.433.1940

Fax: 415.399.8490

Attorneys for Uber Technologies, Inc. and 

Rasier, LLC

[Additional Counsel Listed on Next Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Defendant.

CASE NO. 13-cv-03826-EMC

CASE NO. 14-cv-05200-EMC

CASE NO. 15-cv-00262-EMC

CASE NO. 15-cv-03667-EMC

CASE NO. 16-cv-03134-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

JUDGE: HON. EDWARD M. CHEN

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.

Defendant.

IN RE UBER FCRA LITIGATION 

RICARDO DEL RIO, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.

Defendants.

TODD JOHNSTON, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Defendant.

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 269 Filed 06/08/17 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO

LAURA L. HO, SBN 173179

lho@gbdlegal.com

ANDREW P. LEE, SBN 245903

alee@gbdlegal.com

WILLIAM C. JHAVERI-WEEKS, SBN 289984

wjhaveriweeks@gbdhlegal.com

300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000

Oakland, CA 94612

Tel: 510.763.9800

Fax: 510.835.1417

AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC

TINA WOLFSON, SBN 174806

twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com 

ROBERT AHDOOT, SBN 172098

rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com

THEODORE W. MAYA, SBN 223242

tmaya@ahdootwolfson.com

BRADLEY K. KING, SBN 274399

bking@ahdootwolfson.com

1016 Palm Avenue

West Hollywood, CA 90069

Tel: 310.474.9111

Fax: 310.474.8585

Attorneys for In re Uber FCRA Plaintiffs

THE BRANDI LAW FIRM

Thomas J. Brandi, SBN 53208

tjb@brandilaw.com

Brian J. Malloy, SBN 234882

bjm@brandilaw.com

354 Pine Street, Third Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

415.989.1800

SLACK & DAVIS, LLP

Michael L. Slack, pro hac vice

mslack@slackdavis.com

John R. Davis, SBN 308412

jdavis@slackdavis.com

2705 Bee Cave Road, Suite 220

Austin, TX 78746

Attorneys for Johnston Plaintiff Todd Johnston

HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC

CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER, SBN 197117

chamner@hamnerlaw.com

AMY T. WOOTTON, SBN 188856

awootton@hamnerlaw.com

555 W. 5th Street, 31st Floor

Los Angeles, California 90013

Telephone: 213.533.4160

Facsimile: 213.533.4167

GERAGOS & GERAGOS, APC

MARK J. GERAGOS, SBN 108325

mark@geragos.com

BENJAMIN MEISELAS, SBN 227412

meiselas@geragos.com

644 South Figueroa Street

Los Angeles, California 90017

Telephone: 213.625.3900

Facsimile: 213.232.3255

KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP

BRIAN KABATECK, SBN 152054

bsk@kbklawyers.com

SHANT A. KARNIKIAN, SBN 285048

sk@kbklawyers.com

644 South Figueroa Street

Los Angeles, California 90017

Telephone: 213.217.5000

Facsimile: 213.217.5010

Attorneys for Del Rio Plaintiffs and Douglas 

O’Connor individually

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

Shannon Lis-Riordan (SBN 310719)

sliss@llrlaw.com

Adelaide Pagano, pro hac vice

apagano@llrlaw.com

729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000

Boston, MA 02116

Telephone: 617.994.5800

Facsimile: 617.994.5801

Matthew Carlson (SBN 273242)

mcarlson@llrlaw.com

466 Geary St., Suite 201

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: 415.630.2651

Facsimile: 617.994.5801

Attorneys for O’Connor and the Yucesoy 

Plaintiffs

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 269 Filed 06/08/17 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, all parties in the above-captioned cases, by and through 

their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on November 21, 2016, the Court stayed each of the above-captioned cases until 

the next scheduled Case Management Conference;

WHEREAS, on January 24, 2017, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to reschedule the 

next Case Management Conference in the above-captioned cases to March 23, 2017, at 11:00 a.m., to 

account for a change in the hearing date for the PAGA settlement approval hearing in Price v. Uber 

Technologies, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC554512;

WHEREAS on February 7, 2017, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to reschedule the 

Case Management Conference in the above-captioned cases to March 22, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., in light 

of certain scheduling conflicts;

WHEREAS, the Price Court held a PAGA settlement approval hearing on March 10, 2017

and declined to enter a final order regarding the Price parties’ joint motion for PAGA settlement 

approval;

WHEREAS, the Price Court ordered further supplemental briefing pertaining to the Price 

parties’ joint motion for PAGA settlement approval to be submitted on or before March 24, 2017, and 

scheduled a second PAGA settlement approval hearing for May 2, 2017; 

WHEREAS, this Court held a case management conference in the above-referenced cases on 

March 22, 2017, during which the Court held that the existing stays in the above-referenced cases 

would remain in place, with the exception of certain settlement-related briefing in the In re Uber 

FCRA Litigation and certain arbitration-related briefing in the Johnston litigation;

WHEREAS, this Court indicated that it wanted to schedule the next Case Management 

Conference in the above-captioned cases for a date after the Price Court has completed its PAGA 

settlement approval hearing, see, e.g., O’Connor, Dkt. 803 at 2 (“The Court will continue to monitor 

the Price PAGA settlement, wherein the hearing to approve settlement is set for 5/2/17. If the case 

does not settle, the parties shall address whether and how PAGA claims pending or proposed in Del 

Rio and O’Connor should be handled in the next CMC statement.”);

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 269 Filed 06/08/17 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

WHEREAS, on April 28, 2017, the Price Court rescheduled the Price PAGA settlement 

approval hearing to June 2, 2016, due to the Price Court’s unavailability on May 2, 2017;

WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017, the Price Court rescheduled the Price PAGA settlement 

approval hearing to June 30, 2016, in order to permit the California Department of Industrial 

Relations to submit an amicus brief regarding the Price PAGA settlement;

WHEREAS, the Price PAGA settlement approval hearing is currently scheduled to take place 

on June 30, 2016, after the case management conference in the above-referenced cases;

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that:

1. The Case Management Conference in the above-captioned cases set for June 29, 2017, 

at 11:00 a.m., shall be reset for August 24, 2017, at 11:00 a.m.

2. Case Management Conference Statements in the above-captioned cases shall be due 

on August 17, 2017.

3. Each of the above-captioned cases shall remain STAYED until the next Case 

Management Conference, with the exception of settlement-related briefing in the In re Uber FCRA 

Litigation and certain arbitration-related briefing in the Johnston litigation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

Dated: June 5, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

 /s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.

Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.

Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, 

LLC, and Travis Kalanick

Dated: June 5, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

 /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan

Shannon Liss-Riordan

Attorneys for O’Connor and Yucesoy Plaintiffs

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 269 Filed 06/08/17 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

Dated: June 5, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

 /s/ Andrew M. Spurchise

Andrew M. Spurchise

Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. 

and Rasier, LLC

Dated: June 5, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO

 /s/ Laura L. Ho

Laura L. Ho

Attorneys for In re Uber FCRA Plaintiffs

Dated: June 5, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP

 /s/ Brian Kabateck

Brian Kabateck

Attorneys for Del Rio Plaintiffs and Douglas O’Connor

Dated: June 5, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

THE BRANDI LAW FIRM

 /s/ Brian J. Malloy

Brian J. Malloy

Attorneys for Plaintiff Todd Johnston

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________, 2017 ____________________________________

The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

United States District Judge 

June 8

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 269 Filed 06/08/17 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

JOINT STIPULATION; CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

I, Kevin Ring-Dowell, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from counsel for all parties.

Dated: June 5, 2017 By: /s/ Kevin Ring-Dowell

 Kevin Ring-Dowell

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 269 Filed 06/08/17 Page 6 of 6