Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04085/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04085-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAX & COMPANY, INC., and HOWARD

ROBINSON, on behalf of themselves and

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC.,

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., DELTA

AIR LINES, INC., SOUTHWEST

AIRLINES CO., UNITED

CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC., and

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-4085 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO

HAC VICE APPLICATION

OF ATTORNEY ROGER

A. SACHAR, JR.

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Roger A. Sachar, Jr. (Dkt. No. 18) is DENIED

for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that

“he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the

highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis

added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only

identifies the state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Missouri” — is inadequate under

the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need

to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 28, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-04085-CRB Document 20 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 1