Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04884/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04884-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ETC. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EDWARD F. McHALE (FL SBN 190300) 

McHALE & SLAVIN, P.A. 

2855 PGA Boulevard 

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 

Telephone: 561-625-6575 

Fax: 561-625-6572 

Email: Litigation@mspatents.com

DAVID Z. RIBAKOFF (CA SBN 162925) 

THE PHAN LAW GROUP 

A Professional Law Corporation 

6080 Center Drive, Suite 610 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

Telephone: 310-242-5600 

Fax: 310-943-2126 

Email: dribakoff@lkplaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant GelTech Solutions, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SUSAN P. MARTIN and DAVID E. NEAL, 

 Plaintiffs, 

V. 

GELTECH SOLUTIONS, INC. and ROOTGEL 

WEST 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C09-04884 CW 

THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CHANGING TIME OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

TO TRANSFER OR STAY ACTION 

[Civil L.R. 6-2] 

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs Susan P. Martin and David E. Neal and Defendant GelTech Solutions, Inc. 

(“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate pursuant to Civil 

L.R. 6-2 for a an order changing the briefing schedule on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, 

filed by Plaintiff on December 11, 2009 (the “Motion”), as follows: Opposition to the Motion shall be 

filed and served on or before February 4, 2010. Any reply in support of the Motion shall be filed and 

served on or before February 11, 2010. This Stipulation is supported by the accompanying Declaration 

of Edward F. McHale, submitted in compliance with Civil L.R. 6-2(a). Additionally, Plaintiffs Susan 

Case 4:09-cv-04884-CW Document 32 Filed 01/25/10 Page 1 of 2
THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ETC. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

P. Martin and David E. Neal and Defendant GelTech Solutions, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through 

their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 for a an order changing the 

briefing schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Transfer or Stay Action, filed by Plaintiff on December 7, 

2009 (the “Motion”), as follows: Opposition to the Motion shall be February 4, 2010. Any reply in 

support of the Motion shall be filed and served on or before February 11, 2010. 

This Stipulation is supported by the accompanying Declaration of Edward F. McHale, 

submitted in compliance with Civil L.R. 6-2(a). 

IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 25, 2010 ZIMMERMAN & CRONEN, LLP 

 By: /s/ Michael James Cronen______________ 

 Michael James Cronen 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Susan P. Martin and 

David E. Neal 

Dated: January 25, 2010 McHALE & SLAVIN, P.A. 

 By: /s/ Edward McHale______________________ 

 Edward McHale 

Attorneys for Defendant GelTech Solutions, 

Inc. 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 25, 2010 

 _________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:09-cv-04884-CW Document 32 Filed 01/25/10 Page 2 of 2