Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05677/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05677-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DON JUAN CORNELIUS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

EDWARD ALAMEIDA, Director, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:03-CV-05677 AWI SMS HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #30]

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 8, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED. The Magistrate Judge further

recommended that the Clerk of Court be DIRECTED to enter judgment. This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. 

Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:03-cv-05677-AWI -SMS Document 31 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued August 8, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice; and 

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05677-AWI -SMS Document 31 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 2