Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00407/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00407-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194

Assistant U. S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2760

Attorneys for Federal Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAHOE TAVERN PROPERTY OWNERS

ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, et al.,

Defendants.

CIV. S-06-407 LKK/GGH

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONCERNING PROJECT

IMPLEMENTATION

The parties to this action stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court as provided for

hereon, to the following terms concerning implementation of the projects referenced in the

plaintiffs’ complaint:

1. The projects subject to this stipulation are (1) the project designated as the “64-Acre

Tract Intermodal Transit Center” in the records of decision filed by the federal defendants and

the “Tahoe City Transit Center” in the notice of determination filed by defendant County of

Placer, California; and (2) the project designated as “Lake of the Sky Interpretive Center” in a

separate record of decision filed by defendant United States Department of Agriculture Forest

Service.

////

////

Case 2:06-cv-00407-LKK -GGH Document 26 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. The parties anticipate that no construction will occur in furtherance of these projects

through January 12, 2007, the date that this Court has reserved for hearing on any crossmotions for summary judgment. Defendant Placer County anticipates that it may arrange for

architectural and design services to commence during this period.

3. Defendants agree to provide plaintiffs, though their counsel, with at least sixty days'

advance written notice before commencing any construction in furtherance of the projects

subject to this agreement, until January 12, 2007.

4. Plaintiffs agree not to move for temporary restraint or preliminary injunctive relief

between the date of this stipulation and January 12, 2007, unless the sixty days' advance

written notice of construction in furtherance of the projects has been given.

5. Defendants agree not to cite, as evidence of unreasonable delay in seeking

temporary or preliminary relief in this action, the fact that the plaintiffs refrained from seeking

temporary or preliminary relief between the date of this stipulation and January 12, 2007. By

this stipulation, defendants do not waive the right to raise any other defenses in law or equity

on any other grounds, including laches in bringing the action, or delay in seeking temporary

or preliminary relief before the date of this agreement or after January 12, 2007.

Dated: June 12, 2006 ROSSMANN AND MOORE, LLP

By: /s/ Roger B. Moore 

ROGER B. MOORE

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: June 19, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF 

RICHARD L. CRABTREE

By: /s/ Richard L. Crabtree 

RICHARD L. CRABTREE

Attorneys for Defendant

County of Placer

Case 2:06-cv-00407-LKK -GGH Document 26 Filed 06/27/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Dated: June 9, 2006 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Y H T Himel 

YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL

Assistant U. S. Attorney

Attorneys for Federal Defendants

ORDER

It is APPROVED and SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 26, 2006 _______________________________

Lawrence K. Karlton

Senior Judge 

U.S. District Court

Case 2:06-cv-00407-LKK -GGH Document 26 Filed 06/27/06 Page 3 of 3