Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-00689/USCOURTS-casd-3_12-cv-00689-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

12-cv-689

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE DOE, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:12-cv-689-MMA (DHB)

ORDER GRANTING SUPERVISOR 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER 

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE 54(b)

[Doc. No. 344]

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE 54(b)

This action arises out of a March 8, 2011 incident in which Plaintiff Jane 

Doe was sexually assaulted and battered by San Diego Police Department 

Officer Anthony Arevalos. On March 27, 2014, the Court granted summary 

judgment in favor of Arevalos’ past supervisors (the “Supervisor Defendants”)

on all claims asserted against them. [See Doc. No. 330.] Presently, the

Supervisor Defendants seek entry of final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 54(b). [Doc. No. 344.] The motion is unopposed. 

Under Rule 54(b), “the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one 

or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly 

Case 3:12-cv-00689-MMA-DHB Document 366 Filed 05/20/14 Page 1 of 2
2

12-cv-689

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

determines that there is no just reason for delay.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Here,

the Court’s ruling on the Supervisor Defendants’ summary judgment motion 

adjudicated all claims against them. Moreover, there is no just reason for delay 

in entering final judgment as to the Supervisor Defendants because the claims 

asserted against them are separable from the remaining claims. Thus, good cause 

appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the Supervisor Defendants’ motion for 

entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b).

Accordingly, the Court hereby ENTERS JUDGMENT in favor of 

Defendants William Lansdowne, David Bejarano, Rudy Tai, Danny Hollister, 

Kevin Friedman, Victoria Binkerd, Robert Kanaski, Max Verduzco, and Jorge 

Guevara on all claims and issues alleged against them herein pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2014

_____________________________

Hon. Michael M. Anello

United States District Judge

Case 3:12-cv-00689-MMA-DHB Document 366 Filed 05/20/14 Page 2 of 2