Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00287/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00287-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WELENCO, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

GARY CORBELL, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-0287 KJM CKD 

ORDER 

 On March 12, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 

served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings 

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections to the findings and 

recommendations have been filed. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 

the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

the proper analysis. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 12, 2015 are adopted in full. 

///// 

Case 2:13-cv-00287-KJM-CKD Document 138 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 2. Defendants’ motion for sanctions and joinder therein (ECF Nos. 100, 101) are granted 

in part. 

 3. Evidentiary sanctions are imposed on plaintiffs precluding plaintiffs from introducing 

into evidence, in opposition to the motion for summary judgment or at trial, any documents that 

were not produced by plaintiffs prior to February 14, 2015 and any testimonial evidence from 

witnesses John Duffield, Daniel Guardino, Tyler McMillan, or any person designated to testify on 

behalf of the corporate plaintiffs Welenco and Water Well. 

 4. In light of the adoption of the evidentiary sanctions, and as discussed with the parties at 

hearing on April 24, 2015, the parties are instructed to meet and confer regarding the status of the 

documents, declarations, and testimony that the court may consider in deciding the pending 

motions for summary judgment. The parties are directed to file a joint statement consistent with 

the court’s instructions provided at hearing within fourteen (14) days. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 24, 2015. 

Case 2:13-cv-00287-KJM-CKD Document 138 Filed 04/24/15 Page 2 of 2