Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00033/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00033-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 196
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT

Stephen R. Cornwell, CA Bar #40737

Judith M. Harless, CA Bar #64784

CORNWELL & SAMPLE, LLP

Attorneys at Law

7045 N. Fruit Avenue 

Fresno, CA 93711-0761 

Telephone: (559) 431-3142

Facsimile: (559) 436-1135 

Attorneys for Plaintiff ANAMIRIA MADRIGAL

(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAM P ONLY)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

ANAMIRIA MADRIGAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a

Corporation; NEW CINGULAR

WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a

Corporation; AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, a

Corporation;

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00033-OWW-SMS

STIPULATION FOR ORDER

GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2), the parties, through their respective attorneys of

record, stipulate and agree that Plaintiff ANAMIRIA MADRIGAL may amend her

Complaint on file in this action to add a new party Plaintiff, AZTEK CELLULAR, INC. The

Amended Complaint will be in the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.

The parties further stipulate that Defendants’ written consent to allow this

amendment to the pleading does not constitute a waiver of any defenses or counterclaims

Defendants have or may have with respect to either Plaintiff, MADRIGAL or AZTEK. In

addition, the parties also stipulate that Defendants shall not be required to answer the

amendment, and that all denials, responses, and affirmative defenses in Defendants' answer

to the original complaint are deemed responsive to the amended complaint.

/ / /

Case 1:09-cv-00033-LJO-MJS Document 12 Filed 03/05/09 Page 1 of 2
CORNWELL & SAMPLE LLP

7045 N. Fruit Avenue

Fresno, CA 93711

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT -2-

 DATED: February 26 , 2009. 

CORNWELL & SAMPLE, LLP

By: /s/ Judith M. Harless

Stephen R. Cornwell

Judith M. Harless

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: February 27 , 2009. KOHUT & KOHUT LLP

By: /s/ Richard A. De liberty

Richard A. De Liberty

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

Good cause appearing,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 4, 2009 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00033-LJO-MJS Document 12 Filed 03/05/09 Page 2 of 2