Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-mc-80024/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-mc-80024-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING LEAVE TO 

FILE HYNIX’S SUR-REPLY AND TESSERA’S RESPONSE TO HYNIX’S SUR-REPLY 

Case No. CV 06-80024-MISC-JW (PVT) 

[COUNSEL LISTED

ON SIGNATURE PAGE] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

TESSERA, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR 

PRODUCTS, INC., an Idaho corporation, 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, a German 

corporation, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES 

RICHMOND, LP, a Delaware corporation, and 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH 

AMERICA CORP., a Delaware corporation, 

Defendants.

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV 06-80024-MISC-JW (PVT) 

[Civil Action No. 2-05cv-94, E.D. Tex .] 

STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING LEAVE TO FILE HYNIX’S 

SUR-REPLY AND TESSERA’S 

RESPONSE TO HYNIX’S SUR-REPLY 

Date: March 21, 2006 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: Five, Fourth Floor 

Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull 

 

Case 5:06-mc-80024-JW Document 14 Filed 03/10/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING LEAVE TO - 1 - 

FILE HYNIX’S SUR-REPLY AND TESSERA’S RESPONSE TO HYNIX’S SUR-REPLY

Case No. CV 06-80024-MISC-JW (PVT)

WHEREAS, Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc. (“Hynix”) seeks leave to file a Sur-reply 

in opposition to Tessera Inc.’s Motion for Production of Documents Pursuant to Subpoena to 

Hynix in order to respond to the argument in Tessera’s reply brief that Hynix may simply turn 

over documents produced by Hynix in previous antitrust litigations, an argument Hynix contends 

to be new. 

WHEREAS, while Tessera Inc. (“Tessera”) does not agree that the argument to which 

Hynix wishes to respond is new, Tessera agrees not to oppose Hynix’s request for leave to file a 

Sur-reply, so long as Tessera is allowed to respond to that Sur-Reply. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between counsel for Tessera, on the one hand, 

and counsel for Hynix, on the other, that Hynix is granted leave to file a sur-reply not to exceed 

two pages in length (accompanied by, if necessary, a declaration not to exceed two pages in 

length), and Tessera is granted leave to file a response to that sur-reply not to exceed two pages in 

length (accompanied by, if necessary, a declaration not to exceed two pages in length). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 Alexander F. Wiles (73596) awiles@irell.com

Ellisen S. Turner (224842) eturner@irell.com

Trevor V. Stockinger (226359) tstockinger@irell.com

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 

Los Angeles, California 90067-4276 

Telephone: (310) 277-1010 

Dated: March 9, 2006 By: /s/ 

 Ellisen S. Turner 

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

TESSERA, INC. 

Case 5:06-mc-80024-JW Document 14 Filed 03/10/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING LEAVE TO - 2 - 

FILE HYNIX’S SUR-REPLY AND TESSERA’S RESPONSE TO HYNIX’S SUR-REPLY

Case No. CV 06-80024-MISC-JW (PVT)

Kenneth L. Nissly (77589) kennisly@thelenreid.com

Keith L. Slenkovich (129793) kslenkovich@thelenreid.com

Susan van Keulen (136060) svankeulen@thelenreid.com

Karen S. Reeves (183995) kreeves@thelenreid.com

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

225 West Santa Clara, 12th Floor 

San Jose, California 95113-1723 

Telephone: (408) 292-5800 

Facsimile: (408) 287-8040 

Dated: March 9, 2006 By: /s/ 

 Keith L. Slenkovich 

 ATTORNEY FOR NONPARTY 

 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA, INC 

I, Keith L. Slenkovich, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto. 

Dated: March 9, 2006 /s/ 

 Keith L. Slenkovich 

 ATTORNEY FOR NONPARTY 

 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA, INC 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________, 2006 

 HONORABLE PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL 

March 10 /s/ Patricia V. Trumbull

Case 5:06-mc-80024-JW Document 14 Filed 03/10/06 Page 3 of 3