Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06533/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06533-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DATAPLEX, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR, 

CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

GREG PRIOETTE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

ALEXANDER MA,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

RECLAIM CENTER, INC., ET AL.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

Case No. C-06-06491 JCS

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

PREPARE STATUS REPORT

Case No. C-06-6501 WHA

Case No. C-06-6511 EDL

Case No. C-06-6533 SI

Case 4:06-cv-06533-CW Document 29 Filed 11/09/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

YONI RIBO,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

__________________________________/

ARTHUR MADSEN, ET AL.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

__________________________________/

JAMIE MAITES, ET AL.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

__________________________________/

CHIP-TECH, LTD,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., ET

AL.,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

Case No. C-06-6535 WHA

Case No. C-06-6541 SI

Case No. C-06-6542 SBA

Case No. C06-6698 JSW

The Court has received two administrative motions to consider whether the cases captioned

above should be related. The Initial Case Management Conference in the low-numbered case is

scheduled for January 27, 2007. The Court has also received a notice from the Judicial Panel on

Case 4:06-cv-06533-CW Document 29 Filed 11/09/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Multidistrict Litigation indicating that a motion to transfer has been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§1407 (MDL No. 1819, In re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation). The

plaintiff in Dataplex, Inc. v. Alliance Semiconductor, et al., Case No. C-06-6491 JCS, is hereby

ORDERED to report to the Court, not later than December 15, 2006, regarding the status of the

motion to transfer pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. After receipt of this

status report, the Court will review the administrative motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 8, 2006 _______________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker

Case 4:06-cv-06533-CW Document 29 Filed 11/09/06 Page 3 of 3