Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00118/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00118-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 865
Nature of Suit: Social Security - RSI (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

Social Security Administration

MARK A. WIN, CBN 206077

Special Assistant United States Attorney

333 Market Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8980

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CHERYL L. CRAIN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of )

Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

CIVIL NO. 07-118 MHP

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; PROPOSED

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the

approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time in which to e-file his

response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Agency counsel inadvertently failed to notice the

ECF notification that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment had been filed on July 13, 2007. 

Subject to the approval of the Court, Defendant’s response will now be due on September 11, 2007, 30

days after the date the response was originally due. Counsel has conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel, who

has stated that he has no objection to an extension of time. Counsel needs additional time to review the

case for defensibility, to confer with the Commissioner, and to draft a responsive brief, if warranted. 

Counsel apologizes for the delay and inconvenience and respectfully requests that the court grant this

Case 3:07-cv-00118-MHP Document 14 Filed 08/24/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

unopposed request for extension. This is defendant’s first request for an extension of time. 

Dated: 8/22/07 /s/ Kelly Dunn 

(As authorized via facsimile on 8/22/07)

KELLY DUNN

Attorney for Plaintiff

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Dated: 8/22/07 By: /s/ Mark A. Win 

MARK A. WIN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________ _____________________________

MARILYN H. PATEL

United States District Judge

8/23/2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:07-cv-00118-MHP Document 14 Filed 08/24/07 Page 2 of 2