Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01510/USCOURTS-ca4-10-01510-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1510

JUDY HARRISON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; FBI; CHICAGO FBI-DIVISIONS; 

WASHINGTON FBI-DIVISIONS; VIRGINIA FBI-DIVISIONS,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief 

District Judge. (3:10-cv-00163-JRS)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Judy Harrison, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-1510 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/04/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Judy Harrison appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Harrison v. Central Intelligence Agency, 

No. 3:10-cv-00163-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2010). We deny 

Harrison’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 10-1510 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/04/2010 Pg: 2 of 2