Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02856/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02856-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joel C. Holder, Jr.,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-2856-PHX-MHM (JCG) 

ORDER

Plaintiff, Joel C. Holder, filed his Civil Rights Complaint on September 19, 2005.

(Dkt.#1). The same day the Court issued its "Notice of Assignment" advising Plaintiff that

he "must file a Notice of Change of Address if your address changes" and that failure to

comply "will result in your document being STRUCK and/or your cased being

DISMISSED." (Dkt.#2). On April 20, 2006 the Court issued a screening order advising

Plaintiff that "at all times during the pendency of this action, Plaintiff shall immediately

advise the Court and the United States Marshal of any change of address and its effective

date." (Dkt.#3). On April 26, 2006 Plaintiff's copy of the April 20, 2006 orders were

returned by the post-office with the notation of "Return to Sender." (Dkt.#5). 

The Magistrate Judge filed her Report and Recommendation on June 28, 2006

recommending that Plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with

the Court’s Order and failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) Fed.R.Civ.P. (Dkt.#6). The

Court notes that Plaintiff's copy of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was

Case 2:05-cv-02856-MHM-JCG Document 8 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

returned by the post-office with the notation of "Released." In addition, Plaintiff has not

filed any objections. The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court. (Dkt.#6).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case for Plaintiff's failure to comply

with the Court’s order and failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the clerk of the Court to enter judgment

accordingly.

DATED this 21st day of August, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02856-MHM-JCG Document 8 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 2