Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02064/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02064-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN WALKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

WHITING, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-2064 TLN CKD P

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On August 17, 2015, plaintiff and defendants Whiting, Blanco, Johns, and Bilgera 

stipulated that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a settlement agreement. (ECF 

No. 50; see ECF No. 49.)

On August 20, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to notify the court within fourteen days 

whether he also intended to dismiss this action as to defendant Lee, who had not yet been served 

with the complaint. (ECF No. 51; see ECF No. 45.) As plaintiff has not timely responded, the

undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed as to Lee pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(b).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed against defendants 

Whiting, Blanco, Johns, and Bilgera with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). All parties 

are to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

////

Case 2:14-cv-02064-TLN-CKD Document 52 Filed 09/15/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice as to 

defendant Lee, and this case closed. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: September 14, 2015

2 / walk2064.59c

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-02064-TLN-CKD Document 52 Filed 09/15/15 Page 2 of 2