Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02469/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02469-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH RAY FISHER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2469 DFL JFM PS

vs.

SACRAMENTO SHERIFF

DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed December 20, 2006, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed

and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to

the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:05-cv-02469-RRB -JFM Document 18 Filed 02/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 5, 2007.

001; fish2469.fta2

Case 2:05-cv-02469-RRB -JFM Document 18 Filed 02/05/07 Page 2 of 2