Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-md-02521/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-md-02521-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation. Case No. 14-md-02521-WHO 

ORDER REQUIRING IN CAMERA 

SUBMISSION

Re: Dkt. No. 247

Plaintiffs challenge the withholding of information from six documents by Actavis on the 

basis of attorney client privilege. 

Having reviewed the parties Joint Discovery Dispute (Dkt. No. 427), I ORDER Actavis to 

submit the six documents in question for in camera review no later than 10:00 am Tuesday April 

5, 2016. If necessary, Actavis may file – in the public docket – a brief of no more than three pages 

further explaining the basis for the withholding, along with supporting declarations, by 10:00 am 

Tuesday April 5, 2016.

The parties shall be prepared to discuss this issue during the April 5, 2016, Case 

Management Conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 1, 2016

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-md-02521-WHO Document 432 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 1