Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00908/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00908-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCIS W. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CLARK, et al., 

Defendants. 

 /

1:05-cv-00908-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 33)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 26)

ORDER DENYING PENDING MOTIONS

AS MOOT (Doc. #13 & #31)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Francis W. Davis (“plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 22, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On July 17, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:05-cv-00908-AWI-DLB Document 35 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 22, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed December 27, 2005,

is GRANTED; 

3. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), this action is

DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on plaintiff’s failure to

exhaust the administrative remedies prior to filing suit; and

4. All pending motions are denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00908-AWI-DLB Document 35 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 2