Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00661/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00661-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

___________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Page - 1

PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT

Diehl & Rodewald

1043 Pacific Street

San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH W. DIEHL, JR. (State Bar No. 83303) 

SEAN N. NAGEL (State Bar No. 248763) 

DIEHL & RODEWALD 

1043 Pacific Street 

San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 

Telephone: (805) 541-1000 

Facsimile: (805) 541-6870 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MARSHALL BELLE MILL, LLC; MJP BELLE 

MILL, LLC; 803 CAMBRIA WAY, LLC; MURRELL 

BELLE MILL, LLC; WILSON BELLE MILL, LLC; 

IWF BELLE MILL, LP 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

BRENDA PICKERN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SHARI’S MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 

dba SHARI’S CAFÉ & PIES #141; 

MARSHALL BELLE MILL, LLC; MJP 

BELLE MILL, LLC; 803 CAMBRIA WAY, 

LLC; MURRELL BELLE MILL, LLC; 

WILSON BELLE MILL, LLC; IWF BELLE 

MILL, LP,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 2:15 CV 00661 GEB AC

Assigned to Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:15-cv-00661-GEB-CMK Document 16 Filed 06/03/15 Page 1 of 2
___________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Page - 2

PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT

Diehl & Rodewald

1043 Pacific Street

San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant shall answer 

or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before June 12, 2015. 

Dated: June 3, 2015 

 

Case 2:15-cv-00661-GEB-CMK Document 16 Filed 06/03/15 Page 2 of 2