Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00225/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00225-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to

portions of the Report and Recommendation. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739

(7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Peter Pototsky, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Atlas Air, Inc., et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-225-TUC-FRZ (CRP)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States

Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle on January 5, 2010.1

 The Report and Recommendation

recommends dismissing Defendants John Does 1-5, Thomas J Kassin, Ford, Harris, and

AMR Corporation as Plaintiff failed to serve these Defendants. The Report and

Recommendation indicated that any party could file written objections within 14 days. The

parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. As such, the Court will

not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed the record and

concludes that Magistrate Judge Pyle’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28

Case 4:06-cv-00225-FRZ Document 200 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court notes that Plaintiff filed a document entitled “withdrawal of document 197". See

Doc. #199. To the extent this is pending as a motion to withdraw (Doc. #199), it is denied.

- 2 -

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739

(7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) United States Magistrate Judge Pyle’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #196) is

accepted and adopted.

(2) Defendants John Does 1-5, Thomas J. Kassin, Ford, Harris, and AMR Corporation are

dismissed without prejudice from this action.

(3) As all Defendants have been dismissed from this action, this case is dismissed.

(4) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this matter.2

DATED this 5th day of February, 2010.

Case 4:06-cv-00225-FRZ Document 200 Filed 02/08/10 Page 2 of 2