Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04018/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04018-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

’6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

KEVIN C. McCANN (SB# 120874) 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALJLER LLP 

55 Second Street, Twenty-Fourth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (41 5) 856-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 

kevinmccann@paulhas tings . com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

NEC Corporation, NEC USA, Inc., NEC Solutions 

(America), Inc., and NEC Unified Solutions, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INTERGRAPH HARDWARE 

TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, 

a Nevada corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs . 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, a 

Japanese corporation, 

TOSHIBA AMERICA 

INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., a 

California corporation, 

NEC CORPORATION, a Japanese 

corporation, 

NEC USA, INC., a New York 

corporation. 

NEC SOLUTIONS (AMERICA), 

INC., a Delaware corporation. 

NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS, INC., a 

Nevada corporation,, 

Case No.: C 06-040 18 MHP 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 

FOR THE NEC DEFBNM”DS 

TO RlESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Place: Courtroom 15, 18th Floor 

Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

Defendants. 

STIPULATION EXTENDTNG TIME TO 

RESPOND [CASE NO.: C 06-0401 8 MHP] 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 37 Filed 12/01/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, on June 28, 2006, plaintiff filed its Complaint for patent infringement 

against Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., NEC 

Corporation, NEC USA, Inc., NEC Solutions (America), Inc., and NEC Unified Solutions, Inc. 

(the last four collectively, “the NEC Defendants”); 

WHEREAS, the NEC Defendants accepted service of the Complaint on 

October 24,2005; 

WHEREAS, the plaintiff and the NEC Defendants have reached an agreement in 

principle to resolve this dispute and are in the final stages of completing a formal agreement to 

settle this action; and 

WHEREAS, the interests of judicial efficiency, the administration of justice, and 

the conservation of judicial and the parties’ resources would thus now best be served by an initial 

30-day extension for the NEC Defendants to respond to the Complaint; 

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by plaintiff and the NEC 

Defendants, through their respective undersigned counsel of record, that the NEC Defendants 

shall have a 30-day extension of‘ time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in 

this action, to and including December 13,2006. By executing this Stipulation, it is agreed that 

the NEC Defendants have not waived, and expressly reserve, their rights to challenge the 

Cornplaint on any basis. It is the intention of the parties to this agreement that this Stipulation 

shall not affect the Case Management Conference scheduled for December 4,2006. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: November,,& 2006 JOHN P. BOVICH 

WILLIAM R. OVEREND 

REED SMITH LLP 

WILLIAM H. MANNING 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 

BY 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND [CASE NO.: C 06-04018 MHP] 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 37 Filed 12/01/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DATED: November 10,2006 KEVIN C. McCA" 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

By: /s/ Kevin C. McCann 

Kevin C. McCann 

Attorneys for Defendants 

NEC Corporation, NEC USA, Inc., NEC Solutions 

(America), Inc., and NEC Unified Solutions, Inc. 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND [CASE NO.: C 06-0401 8 MHP] -2- 

Dated: 11/24/6

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 37 Filed 12/01/06 Page 3 of 3