Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04863/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04863-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RODOLFO VELASQUEZ, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, et al.,

 Defendants. 

Case No. 15-cv-04863 YGR 

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO 

ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT 

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers the abovestyled civil action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) Unit for a telephone conference 

to assess this case=s suitability for court-sponsored mediation, settlement conference, early neutral 

evaluation, or other ADR methods. Plaintiff and Defendants= counsel shall participate in a 

telephone conference, to be scheduled by the ADR Unit as soon as reasonably practicable. 

 The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time the telephone conference will be 

held. After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the Court of its recommendation 

for further ADR proceedings. 

The Court VACATES the hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss currently set for May 24, 

2016, and DENIES defendants motion to appear by telephone (Dkt. No. 50) as moot. The Court 

may re-set the hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss, if necessary. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 16, 2016 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:15-cv-04863-YGR Document 51 Filed 05/16/16 Page 1 of 1