Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05240/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05240-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK BENSON , CASE NO. C 3:14-cv-05240

Plaintiff(s),

v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

TESORO REFINING & MARKETING

COMPANY LLC, and does 1-50 ,

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

☐ other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated: February 5, 2015 ____/s/ Randal M. Barnum_____________

Randal M. Barnum

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: February 5, 2015 ____/s/ William J. Dritsas______________

William J. Dritsas,

Attorney for Defendant Tesoro Refining &

Marketing Company LLC

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

x

Case 3:14-cv-05240-EMC Document 13 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 2
☐ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

☐ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________________________

UNITED STATES JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11

Page 2 of 2

18968980v.1

2/6/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-05240-EMC Document 13 Filed 02/06/15 Page 2 of 2