Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02025/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02025-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Reinaldo Carrillo Jaime, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Katrina Kane, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-2025-PHX-FJM

ORDER

We have before us petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 1), respondent’s response (doc. 10), and petitioner’s reply (doc. 13). We

also have before us the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge,

recommending that the petition be denied (doc. 14). No objection to the report and

recommendation was filed and the time for doing so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

72(b)(2). 

Petitioner is a native and citizen of El Salvador who was ordered removed from the

United States as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony. Petitioner’s appeal of the

removal order is presently before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

In his petition for writ of habeas corpus, petitioner contends that his detention since October

11, 2005, pending removal, is constitutionally unlawful. 

Case 2:07-cv-02025-FJM Document 15 Filed 05/23/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The magistrate judge rejected petitioner’s claims, distinguishing Tijani v. Willis, 430

F.3d 1241 (9th Cir. 2005), in part because bond release was available to petitioner throughout

the eleven-month administrative process, and because his judicial appeal time is within the

norm for civil appeals in the Ninth Circuit. Moreover, there is nothing in the record to

suggest that petitioner’s removal to El Salvador will not be effectuated upon the conclusion

of his judicial appeal. 

We accept the recommended decision of the magistrate judge in accordance with Rule

72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. IT IS ORDERED DENYING the petition for writ of habeas corpus

(doc. 1). 

DATED this 23rd day of May, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02025-FJM Document 15 Filed 05/23/08 Page 2 of 2