Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01102/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01102-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HARVEY HOLCOMB, 

Plaintiff,

v.

JERRY RAMAR, a Modesto police officer; 

OFFICER KROUTIL, a Modesto police 

officer; OFFICER COX, a Modesto police 

officer; OFFICER BOTTOMS, a Modesto 

police officer; OFFICER CICCARELLI, a 

Modesto police officer; J. CHANGLER, a 

Modesto police officer; JOHN DOE and 

RICHARD ROE, Modesto police officers, the 

true names and exact numbers of whom are 

unknown at this time; CITY OF MODESTO, a 

municipal corporation,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:13-cv-01102-AWI-SKO

ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY 

DEADLINES

PARTIES

The parties to this Stipulation are Plaintiff HARVEY HOLCOMB (“Plaintiff” or 

“Holcomb”) and Defendants CITY OF MODESTO, JERRY RAMAR, JAIME COX, BEN 

KROUTIL, JOSEPH BOTTOMS, TOM CICCARELLI and JEANNE CHANDLER 

(“Defendants”), collectively, (“Parties”). 

Anthony Boskovich, No. 121198

Law Offices of Anthony Boskovich

28 N. First Street, 6th Floor

San Jose, California 95113-1210

(408) 286-5150

policemisconduct@compuserve.com

Attorney for plaintiff HARVEY HOLCOMB

Case 1:13-cv-01102-AWI-SKO Document 49 Filed 08/10/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Parties have been working cooperatively to complete the necessary 

discovery and expert disclosures by the current deadline of August 15, 2015. The deposition of 

Officer Ramar, the principal defendant in this matter, had to be postponed until August 12. 2015 

due to illness. Accordingly, the parties are requesting a brief continuance of the expert disclosures 

and discovery deadlines as set forth below. The Parties are not requesting that the dispositive 

motions date, pretrial conference, or trial be continued and do not believe that the brief extension 

requested will interfere in any way with the trial date of January 12, 2016.

STIPULATION

WHEREFORE, the Parties agree and stipulate that the scheduling order be amended as 

follows:

CURRENT DATE PROPOSED DATE

Designation of Experts with 

Reports

15 August 2015 4 September 2015

Designation of Rebuttal 

Experts with Reports 

28 August 2015 18 September 2015

Expert Discovery Cutoff 11 September 2015 2 October 2015

Deadline for Filing Expert 

Discovery Motions

See Civ. Loc. Rule 251 See Civ. Loc. Rule 251

All other dates remain as set.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: 5 August 2015 /s/ Anthony Boskovich______________________

ANTHONY BOSKOVICH

Attorney for Plaintiff, Harvey Holcomb

Dated: August 5, 2015 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON

By: /s/ Blake P. Loebs________________

BLAKE P. LOEBS

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 1:13-cv-01102-AWI-SKO Document 49 Filed 08/10/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS the discovery schedule is modified as follows: 

CURRENT DEADLINE NEW DEADLINE

Designation of Experts with 

Reports August 15, 2015 September 4, 2015

Designation of Rebuttal 

Experts with Reports August 28, 2015 September 18, 2015

Expert Discovery Cutoff September 11, 2015 October 2, 2015

Non-Dispositive Motion 

Filing Deadline August 12, 2015 August 24, 2015

Non-Dispositive Motion 

Hearing Deadline September 9, 2015 September 23, 2015

All other dates remain as set.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 10, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01102-AWI-SKO Document 49 Filed 08/10/15 Page 3 of 3