Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01844/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01844-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Operative Comp. (2:24-cv-01844 DJC AC) 

ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668 

Attorney General of California 

ALICIA A. BOWER, State Bar No. 287799 

Supervising Deputy Attorney General 

ARTHUR B. MARK III, State Bar No. 220865 

Deputy Attorney General 

1300 I Street, Suite 125 

P.O. Box 944255 

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 

Telephone: (916) 210-7345 

Fax: (916) 324-5205 

E-mail: Arthur.Mark@doj.ca.gov 

Attorneys for Defendants 

J. Macomber, R. Hickethier, L. Gonzalez, 

L. Parker A. Kent and R. Montes

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

JANE DOE #2, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MARCUS JOHNSON, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:24-cv-01844 DJC AC 

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER 

TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT 

Judge: Honorable Dale A. Drozd 

Trial Date: None Set 

Action Filed: July 1, 2024 

 Plaintiff has filed proofs of service indicating that Defendants Macomber, Kent and 

Hickethier were served with summonses and the Complaint on August 7, 2024. (ECF No. 6) 

Plaintiff has filed proofs of service indicating that Defendants Montes, Parker and Gonzalez were 

served with summonses and the Complaint on August 2, 2024. (ECF No. 6.) Based on the dates 

of service, Defendants Montes, Parker and Gonzalez’s responses to the Complaint are currently 

due August 23, 2024, and Defendants Macomber, Kent and Hickethier’s responses are currently 

due August 28, 2024. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i). 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:24-cv-01844-DJC-AC Document 10 Filed 08/23/24 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Operative Comp. (2:24-cv-01844 DJC AC) 

Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 and Defendants Macomber, Hickethier, Gonzalez, Parker, Kent and 

Montes (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys, stipulate as follows. 

1. Plaintiff and Defendants agree to extend the date for Defendants’ responses to 

Plaintiff’s operative complaint to September 27, 2024. Good cause for the extension exists as 

follows. 

 2. Due to the nature of the allegations, the number of defendants and number of claims, 

Defendants’ counsel cannot reasonably review, investigate, and prepare appropriate responses to 

the operative complaint by the current deadlines. Defendants’ counsel requires additional time to 

review and investigate Plaintiff’s allegations, consult with his clients, and determine and prepare 

appropriate responses to the operative complaint. The extension will also allow the parties to 

meet and confer concerning any potential motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12(b)(1)-(7) and Defendants’ potential opposition to Plaintiff’s pending motion to 

proceed under a pseudonym, ECF No. 3. Accordingly, the parties request the Court enter their 

stipulation and extend the time for Defendants Macomber, Hickethier, Gonzalez, Parker, Kent, 

and Montes to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint until September 27, 2024. 

3. In addition, the parties are meeting and conferring on Plaintiff’s motion to proceed 

under a pseudonym (ECF No. 3.) The parties request that the Court allow objections, if any, or a 

stipulation on Plaintiff’s motion to be filed by September 27, 2024. 

4. This stipulation does not apply to Defendant Marcus Johnson. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:24-cv-01844-DJC-AC Document 10 Filed 08/23/24 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Operative Comp. (2:24-cv-01844 DJC AC) 

 

Dated: August 23, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

ROB BONTA

Attorney General of California 

ALICIA A. BOWER

Supervising Deputy Attorney General 

/s/ Arthur B. Mark III 

ARTHUR B. MARK III 

Deputy Attorney General 

Attorneys for Defendants 

J. Macomber, R. Hickethier, L. Gonzalez, L. 

Parker A. Kent and R. Montes 

/s/ Jenny C. Huang 

(as authorized August 23, 2024) 

Jenny C. Huang 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Jane Doe #2 

Case 2:24-cv-01844-DJC-AC Document 10 Filed 08/23/24 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4 

Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Operative Comp. (2:24-cv-01844 DJC AC) 

ORDER 

Good cause appearing, the parties’ stipulation is GRANTED. 

The time for Defendants Macomber, Hickethier, Gonzalez, Parker, Kent and Montes to 

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended to and including September 27, 2024. 

Any opposition by Defendants to Plaintiff’s pending motion to proceed under a pseudonym 

shall be filed by September 27, 2024. 

This order does not apply to Defendant Marcus Johnson. 

Dated: August 23, 2024 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta 

 THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:24-cv-01844-DJC-AC Document 10 Filed 08/23/24 Page 4 of 4