Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01963/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01963-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TROY BACKUS, on behalf of himself and all

others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

NESTLE USA INC.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 15-1963 MMC

ORDER ON MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Before the Court is defendant Nestle USA Inc.’s (“Nestle”) Administrative Motion to

Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint, filed June 29, 2015. Plaintiff Troy

Backus (“Backus”) has filed opposition thereto. The Court, having read and considered the

papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, finds Nestle has shown good

cause for an extension, but not of the length requested. 

Accordingly, to the extent Nestle seeks an extension, the motion is hereby

GRANTED, and the time by which Nestle’s response to Backus’s first Amended Complaint

is due is hereby extended to July 17, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2015 /s/ William H. Alsup for 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01963-MMC Document 23 Filed 07/06/15 Page 1 of 1