Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00929/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00929-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMMY R. KEETON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SERGEANT WARREN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00929-LJO-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 42)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 34)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Tommy R. Keeton (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking

relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 8, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed on or before May

25, 2007. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:05-cv-00929-LJO-DLB Document 43 Filed 07/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 8, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss based on plaintiff’s

failure to exhaust the available administrative remedies prior to

filing suit, filed September 13, 2006, is GRANTED; and,

3. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), this action is

DISMISSED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 10, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00929-LJO-DLB Document 43 Filed 07/10/07 Page 2 of 2