Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-01386/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-01386-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 448
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Education
Cause of Action: 20:1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped

---

1 

17cv1386-W-MDD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BONSALL UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, 

 Plaintiff,

v. 

RICHARD C. and MELISSA C. on 

their own behalf and on behalf of 

student M.C., and M.C., a minor, 

 Defendants.

 Case No.: 17cv1386-W-MDD 

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 

REGULATING DISCOVERY AND 

OTHER PRETRIAL 

PROCEEDINGS 

Pursuant to Rule 16.1(d) of the Local Rules, a Case Management 

Conference was held on December 19, 2017. The status of the case, at this 

time, is that the cross-appeal of the decision of the Office of Administrative 

Hearings (“OAH”) following a special education administrative “due process” 

proceeding pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 

(“IDEA”; 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.), is ready to proceed. Other causes of action 

brought by Defendants as counter-claims are subject to a pending motion to 

dismiss. The parties agreed that it is appropriate to proceed at this time with 

Case 3:17-cv-01386-W-MDD Document 20 Filed 12/22/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2 

17cv1386-W-MDD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

the cross-appeals OAH order. The parties also recognized that discovery in 

connection with this type of proceeding, although available, is limited. See, 

e.g., C.L. v. Independent School District of Boise City, No. 1, 2013 WL 943838 

*5, No. 1-12-cv-0390-CWD (D. Idaho March 11, 2013). Regarding the crossappeals, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Administrative Record shall be filed on or before January 31, 

2018. 

2. All discovery shall be completed on or before April 30, 2018. 

3. On or before May 31, 2018, the Plaintiff’s motion for summary 

judgment shall be filed. Counsel for the moving party must obtain a motion 

hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will hear the motion 

sufficiently in advance of the filing date. Failure to make a timely request for 

a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. It is anticipated 

that Defendants will file a cross-motion for summary judgment in connection 

with their response to Plaintiff’s motion. 

4. A mandatory settlement conference will be held upon joint request 

of the parties. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 22, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-01386-W-MDD Document 20 Filed 12/22/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2