Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02904/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02904-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C-06-2904 ORDER Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRUCE BURRIS, 

Plaintiff,

v.

AT & T WIRELESS, INC, ET AL.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

No. C 06-2904 JSW (JL)

ORDER

Re Docket # 34

All discovery in this case has been referred by the district court (Hon. Jeffrey S.

White) as provided by 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and Civil Local Rule 72. The parties submitted to

Judge White a joint letter brief regarding a discovery dispute over a subpoena of Plaintiff’s

medical records, which Judge White referred to this Court.

The parties are hereby ordered to meet and confer as provided by this Court’s

Standing Order (available on the U.S. District Court web site), and attempt to resolve this

dispute. This Court recommends that the parties first avail themselves of this Court’s ruling

in C-05-0962 SBA, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lexus of Serramonte, at

Docket # 28, issued March 22, 2006. The parties shall then submit to this Court a joint

statement of no more than five pages, summarizing the outcome of their meet and confer

session, in light of that ruling. This shall be done on or before July 14, 2006.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C-06-2904 ORDER Page 2 of 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 7, 2006

__________________________________

 JAMES LARSON

 Chief Magistrate Judge