Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_04-cv-00858/USCOURTS-azd-3_04-cv-00858-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Here, Magistrate Judge Irwin recommended that this Court grant relief on Petitioner’s

Ground Two by issuing an order directing Petitioner’s release, unless within thirty days of this

Court’s judgment the State of Arizona either: (1) grants Petitioner a re-sentencing before a new

judge, with appropriate restrictions on the prosecution’s ability to challenge the existence of

legal provocation; or (2) permits Petitioner to withdraw his plea of guilty. “In directing resentencing by a different judge, we do not intend any criticism of the [judge]. Rather, the case

law uniformly requires sentencing by a different judge where the government has breached its

plea agreement.” U.S. v. Franco-Lopez, 312 F.3d 984, 994 n. 7 (9th Cir. 2002).

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kyle DeBerry,

Petitioner,

v.

Schroeder, et. al.,

Respondents. _________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-04-0858-PCT-SMM (JRI)

ORDER

Pending before the Court are the parties’ Motions for a 30-day Extension of Time to File

Objections (Doc.63 and 64) to Magistrate Judge Irwin’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.

62). Petitioner as well as Respondents seek this extension based on the fact that the Report and

Recommendation was filed on September 28, 2007, more than three years subsequent to

Petitioner’s filing of the petition on April 26, 2004 and more than three years have passed since

Respondents filed their Answer addressing Ground Two1

, the claim that Magistrate Judge Irwin

recommends to this Court warrants habeas relief. The Court finds that additional time is

Case 3:04-cv-00858-SMM Document 65 Filed 10/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

necessary for the parties to become reacquainted with the claims, particularly in light of the

conclusions and findings set forth in the 75 page Report and Recommendation. 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDEREDGRANTING the parties’ Motions for a 30-day Extension

of Time to File Objections (Doc.63 and 64). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file their Objections to Magistrate

Judge Irwin’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 62) no later than November 16, 2007.

DATED this 9th day of October, 2007.

Case 3:04-cv-00858-SMM Document 65 Filed 10/09/07 Page 2 of 2