Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

IN RE UBER FCRA LITIGATION

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC

Case No. 14-cv-05200-EMC

Case No. 15-cv-00262-EMC

ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S REQUEST 

TO EXPEDITE THE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO STAY

O’Connor Docket No. 440

In re Uber FCRA Litigation Docket No. 141

Yucesoy Docket No. 167

On December 30, 2015, Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. filed a motion for 

administrative relief to expedite the briefing schedule on Uber’s motion to stay the Court’s 

December 23, 2015 order on Plaintiffs’ motions to enjoin Uber’s communications with class and 

putative class members. Plaintiffs are to file any opposition to Uber’s motion to expedite the 

briefing schedule on the motion to stay by January 4, 2016 at 2:00 P.M.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 31, 2015

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 168 Filed 12/31/15 Page 1 of 1