Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02951/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02951-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

Case No. 15-CV-02951-LHK 

RELATED CASE ORDER (IN RE AARON)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

WANDA AARON,

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL NATIONAL 

BANK,

Defendant.

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO

In re Aaron, No. 16-CV-00802-WHA,

Bk. No. 14-40378 CN

Case No. 15-CV-02951-LHK 

RELATED CASE ORDER

(IN RE AARON)

Re: Dkt. No. 69

On February 23, 2016, United States District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District 

of California referred In re Aaron, No. 16-CV 00802-WHA, Bk. No. 14-40378 CN, to the 

undersigned judge for a determination on whether In re Aaron should be related to Aaron v. Wells 

Fargo Financial National Bank (“Wells Fargo”), No. 15-CV-02951-LHK. See ECF No. 69 in the 

Wells Fargo docket. That same day, the parties in Wells Fargo stipulated that In re Aaron is 

related to Wells Fargo. ECF No. 68 in the Wells Fargo docket. In re Aaron and Wells Fargo 

concern substantially the same parties and events, and it appears likely that there will be an unduly 

Case 5:15-cv-02951-LHK Document 70 Filed 02/24/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 15-CV-02951-LHK 

RELATED CASE ORDER (IN RE AARON)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if the cases are conducted 

before different judges. See Civil L.R. 3-12(a). Accordingly, the Court determines that In re 

Aaron should be related to Wells Fargo. 

In re Aaron shall be reassigned to the undersigned judge. All future filings are to bear the 

initials “LHK.” Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and 

must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the 

ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order 

continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly 

assigned judge. A copy of this Order shall be filed in the In re Aaron docket. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 24, 2016

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-02951-LHK Document 70 Filed 02/24/16 Page 2 of 2