Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-04494/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-04494-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIFESCAN SCOTLAND, LTD., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 11-cv-04494-WHO 

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO 

SEAL

In my March 8, 2016 Order I denied the parties’ administrative sealing motions without

prejudice. Dkt. No. 536. I allowed either party who still wished the documents to be sealed to file 

declarations within seven days identifying the particular documents, or portions thereof, to be 

sealed and articulating compelling reasons justifying the requested redactions. I thereafter granted 

a joint stipulation to extend that deadline to March 22, 2016. Dkt. No. 539.

As of this date only plaintiffs LifeScan, Inc. and LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. have filed 

declarations supporting the requests for sealing. After reviewing the newly filed declarations, I 

GRANT the request to seal Exhibit 23 to the declaration of Dr. John Smith, Dkt. Nos. 512-11 and 

512-12, and ORDER plaintiffs to file a new, public Exhibit 23 within seven days of this Order. 

The new version shall redact only the material on PDF pages 9, 118-119, 122-123, 127, 129-130, 

132-133, as described in the DeCinque Declaration. Dkt. No. 540.

I ORDER the Clerk to unseal all other documents filed in connection with the parties’ 

summary judgment motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 28, 2016

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:11-cv-04494-WHO Document 546 Filed 03/28/16 Page 1 of 1