Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05915/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05915-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Stip re Experts 

Zolowicz v. City of Oakland, et al. Case No. C06-05915 MJJ 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JAMES B. CHANIN (SBN# 76043) 

JULIE M. HOUK (SBN# 114968) 

LAW OFFICES OF JAMES B. CHANIN 

3050 Shattuck Avenue 

Berkeley, California 94705 

Telephone: (510) 848-4752, Ext. 2 

Facsimile: (510) 848-5819 

Email: jbcofc@aol.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JACK ZOLOWICZ, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO: C06-05915 MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES RE: 

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT REPORTS; 

COMPLETION OF EXPERT 

DISCOVERY; MOTIONS IN LIMINE 

CONCERNING EXPERTS; DISCLOSURE 

OF EXHIBITS REGARDING EXPERTS 

Trial: November 13, 2007 

) 

 WHEREAS, the parties are currently engaged in good faith settlement discussions and 

the very substantial costs and attorneys’ fees that will be incurred with respect to the expert 

witness services, including, but not limited to, final preparation of Rule 26 expert reports, expert 

depositions and expert discovery, could adversely impact the parties’ ability to reach agreement 

concerning settlement of this matter, and 

 WHEREAS, a settlement conference is currently scheduled before the Honorable James 

Larson on October 19, 2007, at which time the parties expect to continue to negotiate in good 

faith, 

Case 3:06-cv-05915-MJJ Document 61 Filed 10/16/07 Page 1 of 2
Stip re Experts 

Zolowicz v. City of Oakland, et al. Case No. C06-05915 MJJ 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 THE PARTIES DO HEREBY AGREE, STIPULATE AND REQUEST that the Court 

extend the deadlines relating to expert witnesses as follows: 

 1. Deadline to exchange Rule 26 expert reports: October 29, 2007; 

 2. Deadline to complete expert depositions: November 5, 2007; 

 3. Deadline to file motions in limine relating to expert witness issues: November 7, 

2007; 

 4. Deadline to file oppositions to motions in limine regarding expert witnesses: 

November 9, 2007; 

 5. Deadline to file a supplemental joint Pretrial Statement concerning a list of exhibits 

proposed by each party relating to expert witnesses: November 9, 2007. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: October 4, 2007 ______________________________ 

 JULIE M. HOUK 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: October 4, 2007 ____________/S/___________________ 

 JENNIFER N. LOGUE 

 Attorney for City of Oakland Defendants 

Dated: October 4, 2007 ______________/S/_______________ 

 GEOFFREY A. BEATY 

 Attorney for Defendant J. Roca 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: ______________, 2007 ________________________________ 

 MARTIN J. JENKINS 

 Judge of the United States 

 District Court 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

10/16

Case 3:06-cv-05915-MJJ Document 61 Filed 10/16/07 Page 2 of 2