Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00291/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00291-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Breach of Contract

---

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court finds this matter suitable for determination

without oral argument and vacates the April 2, 2015 hearing.

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco

JMT CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOUGLAS W. JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 15-00291 LB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIMS

AS MOOT

[Re: ECF No. 10]

On January 21, 2015, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants. (Complaint, ECF No. 1.) 

On February 5, 2015, Defendants answered the complaint and brought two counterclaims against

Plaintiff. (Original Answer and Counterclaim, ECF No. 6.) On February 26, 2015, Plaintiff moved

to dismiss Defendants’ counterclaims. (Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 10.) On February 27, 2015,

presumably in response to Plaintiff’s motion, Defendants filed an amended answer that omits their

counterclaims. (Amended Answer, ECF No. 12.) Defendants’ amended answer, then, moots

Plaintiff’s motion. Accordingly, the court denies Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss as moot.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2015 _______________________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00291-LB Document 13 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 1