Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-md-02045/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-md-02045-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 Case No. M 09-02045 JW

STIP. REQUEST OF ATTM TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATIONS ON CONSOLIDATED REPLY 

ON MOTS. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION [CIVIL L.R. 7-4(b) AND 7-11]; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

M. Kay Martin (CSB No. 154697) 

 mmartin@crowell.com 

Kevin P. O’Brien (CSB No. 215148) 

 kobrien@crowell.com 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 986-2800 

Facsimile: (415) 986-2827 

Kathleen Taylor Sooy (pro hac vice) 

ksooy@crowell.com 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Telephone: (202) 624-2500 

Facsimile: (202) 628-5116 

Counsel for AT&T Mobility LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION

In re Apple iPhone 3G Products Liability 

Litigation 

THIS MATTER PERTAINS TO: 

ALL ACTIONS 

 CASE NO. M 09-02045 JW 

CLASS ACTION 

STIPULATED REQUEST OF AT&T 

MOBILITY LLC TO ENLARGE PAGE 

LIMITATIONS ON CONSOLIDATED 

REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT 

OF MOTIONS TO COMPEL 

ARBITRATION [CIVIL L.R. 7-4(b) 

and 7-11]; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

By this Stipulated Request, Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC (“ATTM”) respectfully 

requests, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-4(b) and 7-11, to enlarge the page limitations applicable 

to its Consolidated Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motions to Compel Arbitration 

(“Reply”), as set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), by twenty (20) pages. 

WHEREAS, on October 21, 2009, Plaintiffs filed the Master Administrative Consolidated 

Amended Complaint, asserting 14 causes of action against Defendants. 

Case 5:09-md-02045-JW Document 154 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 Case No. M 09-02045 JW

STIP. REQUEST OF ATTM TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATIONS ON CONSOLIDATED REPLY 

ON MOTS. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION [CIVIL L.R. 7-4(b) AND 7-11]; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

WHEREAS, on December 4 and 24, 2009, ATTM filed seven Motions to Compel 

Arbitration with respect to the actions filed against ATTM by the Named Plaintiffs in each of the 

states collected in this MDL proceeding. Plaintiffs filed a single, 40-page Consolidated 

Opposition to ATTM’s Motions to Compel Arbitration on January 27, 2010. 

WHEREAS, in order to adequately address the applicable choice of law requirements of 

each of the states at issue and reply to Plaintiffs’ 40-page consolidated opposition brief, it is 

necessary for ATTM’s Reply to exceed the fifteen (15) page limitation set forth in Local Rule 7-

4(b). Rather than file seven reply memoranda, ATTM will file one consolidated reply 

memorandum addressing Plaintiffs’ arguments, which will result in less briefing submitted to the 

Court than filing multiple reply memoranda. 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ lead counsel, Joe R. Whatley, Jr. has agreed on behalf of Plaintiffs 

to ATTM’s request to enlarge the page limitation for the Consolidated Reply by twenty (20) 

pages. 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that ATTM 

may exceed the page limit set forth in Local Rule 7-4(b) by no more than twenty (20) pages for its 

Consolidated Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motions to Compel Arbitration. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Case 5:09-md-02045-JW Document 154 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3 Case No. M 09-02045 JW

STIP. REQUEST OF ATTM TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATIONS ON CONSOLIDATED REPLY 

ON MOTS. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION [CIVIL L.R. 7-4(b) AND 7-11]; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DATED: February 9, 2010 CROWELL & MORING LLP 

 By: /s/ M. Kay Martin 

M. Kay Martin 

 mmartin@crowell.com 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 986-2800 

Facsimile: (415) 986-2827 

Kathleen Taylor Sooy 

 Ksooy @crowell.com 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Telephone: (202) 624-2500 

Fascimile: (202) 628-5116 

Counsel for Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC 

DATED: February 9, 2010 WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS LLC 

 By: /s/ Joe R. Whatley, Jr. 

Joe R. Whatley, Jr. 

 jwhatley@wdklaw.com 

Whatley Drake & Kallas LLC 

1540 Broadway, 375h Fl. 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 447-7070 

Facsimile: (212) 447-7077 

Counsel for Plainitff Aaron Walters and Lead Class 

Counsel 

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE

I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the 

Plaintiffs listed in the signature block above. 

DATED: February 9, 2010 CROWELL & MORING LLP 

 By: /s/ M. Kay Martin 

Case 5:09-md-02045-JW Document 154 Filed 02/11/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 4 Case No. M 09-02045 JW

STIP. REQUEST OF ATTM TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATIONS ON CONSOLIDATED REPLY 

ON MOTS. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION [CIVIL L.R. 7-4(b) AND 7-11]; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February ___, 2010 

______________________________________ 

The Honorable James Ware 

United States District Judge 

11

Case 5:09-md-02045-JW Document 154 Filed 02/11/10 Page 4 of 4