Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01024/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01024-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Benny Ford is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On May 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for clarification relating to pretrial proceedings.

On April 13, 2015, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending 

denial of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 115.) As stated in the findings and 

recommendations, the recommendations are submitted to the district judge who may “accept, reject or 

modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations ...” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The 

Findings and Recommendations have not yet been reviewed by the assigned district judge, and 

Plaintiff’s motion for clarification as to further proceedings is premature until the resolution of the 

///

///

///

BENNY FORD,

 Plaintiff,

v.

G. WILDEY, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01024-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION 

[ECF No. 121]

Case 1:10-cv-01024-SAB Document 122 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

pending findings and recommendations. Thus, Plaintiff’s motion for clarification as to further 

proceedings is DENIED as premature. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01024-SAB Document 122 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 2