Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05117/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05117-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The Findings and Recommendations served at the address Plaintiff provided this court

were returned with notification that Plaintiff is no longer there. Service at the last address

provided by Plaintiff is sufficient. See Local Rule 83-183.

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRY PARKER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MATTHEW C. KRAMER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:02-cv-5117-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 91)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 59)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF

COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 30, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations that

recommended Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on claim two be granted and judgment

be entered in favor of Defendants. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the

parties and contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and

Recommendations were to be filed within twenty days.1 Over twenty days have passed and no

party has filed objections. 

Case 1:02-cv-05117-AWI-DLB Document 93 Filed 09/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305,

this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

including the objections, the court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by

the record and by proper analysis. The court agrees that there are no genuine issue of material

fact with respect to Plaintiff’s equal protection claims.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 30, 2005, are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on claim two is GRANTED;

3. As this order resolves the final claim remaining in this action, the Clerk of Court

is DIRECTED to enter Judgment in favor of DEFENDANTS; and

4. This Order terminates the action in its entirety and all pending motions are

DENIED as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 27, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05117-AWI-DLB Document 93 Filed 09/29/05 Page 2 of 2