Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03962/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03962-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STACIE PLUMMER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF RICHMOND, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-03962-VC 

ORDER RE DISCOVERY MOTION

Re: Dkt. No. 72

Plummer's motion for disclosure of documents relating to independent investigations 

commissioned by the City of Richmond is denied, except possibly with respect to the investigation 

of Sue Ann Van Dermyden. Because the City issued a fairly detailed press release about the 

results of Van Dermyden's investigation, the Court would like further briefing and argument on 

whether the City waived the applicable privileges with respect to this investigation (at least to the 

extent that the City should be required to disclose the report and related documents under the 

terms of a protective order). Plummer should file a supplemental brief no longer than five pages 

(double-spaced) solely on this question by June 29, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. The defendants should file 

a supplemental response brief, subject to the same page limit, by July 6, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. A

hearing will take place on July 9, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. 

At this hearing, the parties should also be prepared to discuss the other discovery motion 

(Doc. No. 71) if they have not resolved their dispute by that time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 22, 2015

______________________________________

 VINCE CHHABRIA

 United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-03962-VC Document 74 Filed 06/22/15 Page 1 of 1