Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03838/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03838-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

-1- 

W02-WEST:1RMH1\400131438.1 Case No. C 02-3838 MMC

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Extend 

Time to File Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' 

Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I (Intentional Fraudulent Transfer)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH F. COYNE, JR., Cal. Bar No. 93707

MICHELLE SHERMAN, Cal. Bar No. 136799 

jcoyne@sheppardmullin.com

msherman@sheppardmullin.com

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

333 South Hope Street, 48th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071-1448 

Telephone: 213-620-1780 

Facsimile: 213-620-1398 

Attorneys for Defendants

FORT JAMES CORPORATION

AND RELATED ENTITIES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CROWN PAPER COMPANY; 

CROWN VANTAGE, INC., JEFFREY 

H. BECK, Liquidating Trustee; and 

CROWN PAPER LIQUIDATING 

TRUST,

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

FORT JAMES CORPORATION, f/k/a 

JAMES RIVER CORPORATION OF 

VIRGINIA; FORT JAMES 

OPERATING COMPANY; FORT 

JAMES FIBER COMPANY, f/k/a 

JAMES RIVER TIMBER 

CORPORATION; and FORT JAMES 

INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, 

LTD., f/k/a JAMES RIVER 

INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, 

LTD.,

 Defendants. 

 Case No. C 02-3838 MMC 

Order Granting Defendants' Request 

to Continue Time to File Reply to 

Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' 

Motions for Summary Judgment on 

Count I (Intentional Fraudulent 

Transfer) 

Date: December 15, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

Courtroom: 7 (19th Floor) 

Case 3:02-cv-03838-MMC Document 193 Filed 12/01/06 Page 1 of 2
 -1- 

W02-WEST:1RMH1\400131438.1 Case No. C 02-3838 MMC

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Extend 

Time to File Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' 

Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I (Intentional Fraudulent Transfer)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Having considered Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File 

Declarations of Experts in Opposition to Fort James' Two Motions for Summary 

Judgment, and the Response of Defendants Fort James Corporation, Fort James 

Fiber Company, Fort James Operating Company, and Fort James International 

Holdings, Ltd. (collectively, "Fort James"), the Court finds that there is good cause 

to grant the motion to continue the time for Fort James to file its reply to Plaintiffs 

Opposition to Fort James' Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I (Intentional 

Fraudulent Transfer). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Fort James to file its reply 

to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Fort James' Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I 

(Intentional Fraudulent Transfer) is continued to noon, Wednesday, December 6, 

2006. Defendants shall deliver chambers copies of their reply by 10:00 a.m. on 

Thursday, December 7, 2006. 

Dated: December 1, 2006 

 Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:02-cv-03838-MMC Document 193 Filed 12/01/06 Page 2 of 2