Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02099/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02099-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ROSS DUSTIN, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, and DOES 1 

through 100 inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 5:18-cv-02099-9.'

Assigned to Judge 9LUJLQLD.'H0DUFKL

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

SECOND STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND DEFENDANT CAPITAL 

ONE, N.A.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

Initial Resp. Date: June 4, 2018 

New Resp. Date: June 18, 2018 

Complaint Filed: April 6, 2018 

Trial: TBD 

Case 3:18-cv-02099-RS Document 13 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAIN7

The Court, having reviewed the stipulation of plaintiff Ross Dustin (“Plaintiff”) 

and defendant Capital One, N.A. (“Capital One”) to further extend the time for Capital 

One to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and good cause having been shown, hereby 

GRANTS the parties’ request. Capital One is ordered to file a responsive pleading to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before June 18, 2018. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________, 2018 __________________________________ 

 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Hon. Virginia K. DeMarchi June 11

Case 3:18-cv-02099-RS Document 13 Filed 06/11/18 Page 2 of 2