Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01995/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01995-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 09-1995 JF (PVT)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO RESET HEARING DATE

(JFLC2)

**E-Filed 5/3/2010**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JOSE R. CARNERO, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

LUKE WEAVER, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case Number C 09-1995 JF (PVT)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO RESET

HEARING DATE

On April 28, 2010, Plaintiff Marta Carnero telephoned chambers staff to request that the

May 14, 2010 hearing date on Defendants’ motions to dismiss and strike be continued; Ms.

Carnero stated that Defendants had not cleared the hearing date with Plaintiffs and that she and

her husband would be on vacation on May 14. Chambers staff emailed Defendants’ counsel to

ask for a response to Plaintiffs’ request; Plaintiffs were copied on the email. Counsel for both

moving Defendants responded by email, objecting to continuance of the hearing date. Plaintiffs

also filed a written request to continue the hearing date until June 18 or June 25. Defendant

Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc. filed opposition to that request on April 29.

While the Court is sympathetic to Defendants’ frustration at the lateness of Plaintiffs’

request, it is not clear that the hearing date in fact was cleared with Plaintiffs. Moreover,

Case 3:09-cv-01995-SI Document 68 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 09-1995 JF (PVT)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO RESET HEARING DATE

(JFLC2)

Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se. Accordingly, while the Court is not inclined to grant a

continuance of the length requested by Plaintiffs, the Court will grant a two-week continuance, to

May 28, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiffs may file opposition to the motions to dismiss and strike on

or before May 14, 2010; any such opposition shall explain why Plaintiffs failed to file opposition

on or before April 23, 2010 as required under the Court’s Civil Local Rules. Defendants may file

replies on or before May 21, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2010

__________________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01995-SI Document 68 Filed 05/03/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case No. C 09-1995 JF (PVT)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO RESET HEARING DATE

(JFLC2)

Copies of Order served on:

Eric D. Houser scleere@houser-law.com 

Joshua Howard Abel jabel@houser-law.com, chershey@houser-law.com 

Lee P. Bardellini cmcalice@bscb.com, storres@bscb.com 

Jose and Marta Carnero jrcarnero@gmail.com

Jose R. Carnero

Marta C. Carnero

1558 Minnesota Avenue 1/2

San Jose, CA 95125-4445

Case 3:09-cv-01995-SI Document 68 Filed 05/03/10 Page 3 of 3