Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-02120/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-02120-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT DORROH, et. al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DEERBROOK INSURANCE

COMPANY, a wholly-owned subsidiary of

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-2120 AWI GSA

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

(Doc. 94)

Cedar Sol Warren is not currently a party in this case. He has made a motion to be

substituted in as plaintiff. Doc. 69. Magistrate Judge Austin denied the motion. Doc. 81. Warren

then filed what he termed an “Objection to the Non-Dispositive Order of the Magistrate Judge,”

citing Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 72(a) and Local Rule 304(b). Doc. 94. Warren appears to be

operating under the assumption that Magistrate Judge Austin’s order was a Findings and

Recommendation. The order (Doc. 81) is not a Findings and Recommendation; the proper

procedure is reconsideration under Local Rule 303. The court deems Warren’s filing (Doc. 94) a

motion for reconsideration. Defendant may file an opposition by 4:00 PM on December 10,

2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 27, 2012 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

1

Case 1:11-cv-02120-DAD-EPG Document 103 Filed 11/27/12 Page 1 of 1