Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01806/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01806-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN G. DUNMORE, No. CIV.S-05-1806 LKK DAD PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

COUNTY OF PLACER, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

This matter came before the court on August 4, 2006, for

hearing on defendants’ Sheriff Edward N. Bonner and Undersheriff

Stephen L. D’Arcy’s motion for protective order and plaintiff Steven

G. Dunmore’s motion for in camera review and to compel further

answers to interrogatories. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, appeared

on his own behalf. Brian Wirtz appeared on behalf of defendants. 

Having considered all written materials submitted in

connection with the motions, including those materials reviewed in

camera during the hearing on the motions, and after hearing oral

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01806-LKK -DAD Document 39 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 The court conducted a limited in camera review during the 1

hearing and determined the assertions of privilege to be appropriate

as to documents 11 and 18 as referred to in the privilege log

produced by defendants.

2

argument, for the reasons set forth on the record during the hearing,

it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ motion for protective order is granted in

part and denied in part. Sheriff Edward N. Bonner and Undersheriff

Stephen L. D’Arcy’s each shall make themselves available for a

deposition not to exceed two (2) hours in length. The depositions

shall be conducted so as to be completed by August 31, 2006. The

parties are directed to cooperate in the scheduling of the

depositions. The parties shall notify the court of the date and

times selected so that the court may be available to resolve by

telephone any disputes that might arise during the deposition. In

the event of any such disputes, the parties shall contact Pete Buzo,

the courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916)

930-4128.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for in camera review , to compel 1

further answers to interrogatories and for sanctions is denied.

DATED: August 4, 2006.

DAD:th

Ddad1\orders.civil\dunmore1806.oah.080406

Case 2:05-cv-01806-LKK -DAD Document 39 Filed 08/07/06 Page 2 of 2