Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04483/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04483-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

---

3:15 CV 4483 EMC Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to file MSJ with Proposed Order Michalski v.Colvin

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dolly M. Trompeter (CSBN 235784)

Attorney At Law

2261 Market Street, No. 185

San Francisco, CA 94114 

Telephone: 415 271-8604 

Fax: 415 431-0279 

Email: Dolly@DollyDisabilityLaw.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Thomas A. Michalski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS A. MICHALSKI, ) 

Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 3:15-cv-4483-EMC

)

v. )

)

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

Acting Commissioner of ) TIME IN WHICH TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

Social Security, ) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and PROPOSED

) ORDER

)

Defendant. )

______________________________ )

Pursuant to N.D.C.A Civil Local Rule 6, Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully 

moves this Court for an enlargement of time of 30 days, up to and including July 9, 2016 in which to file 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. On June 5, 2016, the undersigned counsel emailed with both Mr. 

Rodriguez, SSA Assistant Regional Counsel and also Mr. Win, who is the Supervising SSA Attorney, and 

requested a stipulation agreeing to extend Plaintiff’s time for filing his Motion for Summary Judgment by 30 

days from June 9, 2016 to July 9, 2016; Mr. Rodriguez and Mr. Win said that Defendant would not oppose 

Plaintiff’s motion to extend time. 

This extension is necessary to provide further opportunity for review and analysis of this case, as 

undersigned counsel was not the original attorney on the case and is in the process of exploring the possibility

of Request for Voluntary Remand in order to avoid further litigation in this case. Plaintiff does not believe 

Case 3:15-cv-04483-EMC Document 13 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:15-cv-04483-EMC Document 14 Filed 06/08/16 Page 1 of 2
3:15 CV 4483 EMC Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to file MSJ with Proposed Order Michalski v.Colvin

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

that Defendant will be prejudiced by his delay. This is further evidenced by the Defendant’s declining to 

oppose this Motion. This is Plaintiff’s second request for an extension. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the facts recited above and true and correct. Executed this seventh day 

of June 2016 in San Francisco, CA.

By “/s/_Dolly M. Trompeter”

DOLLY M. TROMPETER, ESQ.

Attorney for Plaintiff

 

IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have an additional 30 days in which to file his motion for summary 

judgment, up to and including JULY 9, 2016.

Dated: ___________ ________________________________

HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN,

United States District Court Judge

Northern District of California

Case 3:15-cv-04483-EMC Document 13 Filed 06/07/16 Page 2 of 2

6/8/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-04483-EMC Document 14 Filed 06/08/16 Page 2 of 2