Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05429/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05429-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

U

nite

d

State

s

District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GENENTECH, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INSMED INCORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-04-5429 CW (EMC)

ORDER RE SCHEDULING FOR

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

SECOND EXPERT REPORT OF KEITH

C. BACKMAN

(Docket No. 601)

Defendants have filed a motion to strike the second expert report of Keith C. Backman,

which Judge Wilken has referred to the undersigned for resolution. Although Defendants did not ask

that the motion be heard on shortened time, the Court finds that shortened time is necessary in light

of the case management deadlines in this case.

Accordingly, the Court hereby sets the above motion for hearing on October 11, 2006, at

10:30 a.m. Plaintiffs’ opposition brief is due by 12:00 p.m. on October 2, 2006, and Defendants’

reply brief by 12:00 p.m. on October 6, 2006. Courtesy copies of the briefs (including documents

filed under seal) shall be delivered directly to chambers by 1:00 p.m. on the date that each

respective brief is due.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2006

 

 EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 607 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 1