Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-03734/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-03734-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHERIE ABEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

OCEANIC ARCATA, LP, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-03734-SI 

ORDER RE PREVIOUS DISCOVERY 

DISPUTE

Re: Dkt. No. 66

During the November 8, 2019 hearing on defendant Oceanic Arcata’s motion for summary 

judgment, it was brought to the Court’s attention that its October 7, 2019 order on the parties’ 

discovery dispute (Dkt. No. 66) may have a typographical error. The October 7, 2019 order does in 

fact have a typo on page 2 line 20. The sentence on page 2 line 20 that currently reads “Plaintiff 

shall supplement her responses to SROGS 1-11...” should have read “Plaintiff shall supplement her 

responses to SROGS 13-20...” 

Plaintiff shall supplement her responses to SROGS 13-20 on or before November 22, 2019.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 8, 2019

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-03734-SI Document 72 Filed 11/08/19 Page 1 of 1