Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01279/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01279-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

INTEL CORPORATION and ARM, INC.,

Defendants. /

No. C 14-01279 WHA

ORDER DENYING MOTION

TO RECONSIDER

An August 19, 2014 order granted Intel Corporation’s motion to declare pro se Michael

Bruzzone a vexatious litigant (Dkt. No. 88). Although Bruzzone did not attend the hearing on

the motion he has now moved for reconsideration of that order as well as an order declaring that

he was not a relator, for the fifth time. With this attempt, Bruzzone has filed a supplemental

brief that cites dozens of decisions discussing due process (and an academic article about the

Magna Carta), but he has again failed to raise any material difference in fact or law from that

presented when the initial order issued or when his first four motions for reconsideration was

denied (Dkt. No. 94). He has simply restated the same baseless allegations of a conspiracy

among defendants and the Court to “damn Bruzzone as vexatious.” For the reasons stated in the

prior order denying Bruzzone’s motion for reconsideration, Bruzzone’s motion is DENIED. 

The pre-filing review order shall remain in place.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 13, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-01279-WHA Document 107 Filed 10/13/15 Page 1 of 1