Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01214/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01214-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations 1

was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court

apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents

at the record address of the party is fully effective.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTHUR L. HALL, JR., No. 2:06-cv-1214-MCE-EFB-PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

WASHOE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA

& NEVADA, CHAIRMAN & COURT &

CHIEF OF POLICE OF SAID TRIBE,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

On August 15, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and

recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.1

///

///

Case 2:06-cv-01214-MCE -EFB Document 12 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed findings and recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed findings and recommendations filed August 15, 2006, are ADOPTED;

and

2. This action is dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b)(1).

DATED: October 12, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01214-MCE -EFB Document 12 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 2