Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-241/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 MDL 1917 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PHILIPS TAIWAN 

LIMITED’S AND PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INSUFFICIENT SERVICE OF 

PROCESS AND LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (3:07-CV-5944 SC, MDL NO. 1917). 

(Stipulating Parties Listed on Signature Page) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS 

Case No. 07-5944 SC 

MDL No. 1917 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR PHILIPS TAIWAN 

LIMITED’S AND PHILIPS DO BRASIL 

LTDA.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR 

INSUFFICIENT SERVICE OF PROCESS 

AND LACK OF PERSONAL 

JURISDICTION

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2504 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 - MDL 1917 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PHILIPS TAIWAN 

LIMITED’S AND PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INSUFFICIENT SERVICE OF 

PROCESS AND LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (3:07-CV-5944 SC, MDL NO. 1917). 

WHEREAS, the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs (“IPPs”) filed a Fourth Consolidated Amended 

Complaint on January 10, 2013 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California against Defendants Philips Taiwan Limited and Philips do Brasil Ltda.1

 (collectively the 

“Philips Defendants”), among others; 

WHEREAS, the Philips Defendants intend to file a Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss 

the IPPs’ Fourth Consolidated Amended Complaint for Insufficient Service of Process and Lack of 

Personal Jurisdiction (the “Motion to Dismiss”) and to notice the Motion to Dismiss for a hearing on 

May 30, 2014; 

WHEREAS, counsel for the Philips Defendants and counsel for the IPPs have met and 

conferred and have agreed upon a mutually acceptable briefing schedule relating to the Philips 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Philips Defendants and 

the IPPs that: 

1. The Philips Defendants shall file their Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss the IPPs’ 

Fourth Consolidated Amended Complaint for Insufficient Service of Process and Lack of Personal 

Jurisdiction (the “Motion to Dismiss”) on or before March 26, 2014; 

2. IPPs shall submit their Opposition to the Philips Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on or 

before April 14, 2014; and 

3. The Philips Defendants shall file their Reply Brief in support of their Motion to Dismiss 

on or before April 24, 2014.

* * * 

The undersigned parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this stipulation 

as an order. 

1

 The IPPs’ Fourth Consolidated Amended Complaint names Philips Electronics Industries 

(Taiwan), Ltd. and Philips da Amazonia Industria Ltda. as defendants. But Philips Electronics 

Industries (Taiwan), Ltd. has been merged into Philips Taiwan Limited and Philips da Amazonia 

Industria Electronica Ltda. has been merged into Philips do Brasil Ltda. 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2504 Filed 03/28/14 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 3 - MDL 1917 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PHILIPS TAIWAN 

LIMITED’S AND PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INSUFFICIENT SERVICE OF 

PROCESS AND LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (3:07-CV-5944 SC, MDL NO. 1917). 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________________ ________________________________ 

 Hon. Samuel Conti 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: March 26, 2014 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 

By: /s/ Erik T. Koons 

Jon V. Swenson (SBN 233054) 

1001 Page Mill Road 

Building One, Suite 200 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 739-7500 

Facsimile: (650) 739-7699 

Email: jon.swenson@bakerbotts.com 

John M. Taladay (pro hac vice)

Joseph Ostoyich (pro hac vice)

Erik T. Koons (pro hac vice)

Charles M. Malaise (pro hac vice)

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 

1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Washington, DC 20004-2400 

Telephone: (202) 639-7700 

Facsimile: (202) 639-7890 

Email: john.taladay@bakerbotts.com 

Email: joseph.ostyoich@bakerbotts.com 

Email: erik.koons@bakerbotts.com 

Email: charles.malaise@bakerbotts.com 

Attorneys Specially Appearing for 

Defendants Philips Taiwan Limited and 

Philips do Brasil Ltda.

03/27/2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2504 Filed 03/28/14 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 4 - MDL 1917 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PHILIPS TAIWAN 

LIMITED’S AND PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INSUFFICIENT SERVICE OF 

PROCESS AND LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (3:07-CV-5944 SC, MDL NO. 1917). 

TRUMP, ALIOTO, TRUMP & PRESCOTT, 

LLP

By: /s/ Mario N. Alioto 

MARIO N. ALIOTO (SBN 56433) 

Email: malioto@tatp.com 

LAUREN C. CAPURRO (SBN 241151) 

Email: laurenrussell@tatp.com 

TRUMP, ALIOTO, TRUMP & 

PRESCOTT, LLP 

2280 Union Street 

San Francisco, CA 94123 

Telephone: (415) 563-7200 

Facsimile: (415) 346-0679 

Interim Lead Counsel for the Indirect 

Purchaser Plaintiffs 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2504 Filed 03/28/14 Page 4 of 4