Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01545/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01545-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONE LA. KNOX,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1545 DFL KJM P

vs.

NICHOLAS JOLLYMORE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed October 3, 2006, plaintiff was granted a thirty day extension of

time in which to file his in forma pauperis affidavit. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or

paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action

be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

Case 2:06-cv-01545-RRB -KJM Document 7 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 15, 2006. 

/mp

knox1545.fifp

Case 2:06-cv-01545-RRB -KJM Document 7 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 2