Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02093/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02093-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE 

APPLICATIONS TO MODIFY BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS 

AND FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

DAVID A. APPLEBAUM

David.Applebaum@ferc.gov

WESLEY J. HEATH

Wesley.Heath@ferc.gov

EMILY C. SCRUGGS

Emily.Scruggs@ferc.gov

MARIA CRISTINA MELENDEZ

Cristina.Melendez@ferc.gov

ANDREW PAUL TAMAYO

Andrew.Tamayo@ferc.gov

Office of Enforcement

888 1st Street, N.E.

Washington, DC 20426

Telephone: (202) 502-8100

Attorneys for FEDERAL ENERGY

REGULATORY COMMISSION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

BARCLAYS BANK PLC; DANIEL BRIN; 

SCOTT CONNELLY; KAREN LEVINE; and 

RYAN SMITH,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 2:13-cv-02093-TLN-EFB 

(TEMP)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX 

PARTE APPLICATIONS TO MODIFY

BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS AND FOR 

AN EXTENSION OF TIME 

[FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH

(1) PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE 

APPLICATION TO MODIFY 

BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS IN REPLY 

TO DEFENDANTS’ FEBRUARY 1, 2016 

OPPOSITIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO AFFIRM CIVIL 

PENALTIES;

(2) PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE 

APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO REPLY TO 

DEFENDANTS’ FEBRUARY 1, 2016

OPPOSITIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO AFFIRM CIVIL 

PENALTIES]

Presiding: Hon. Troy L. Nunley

Courtroom: 2, 15th Floor

)

Case 2:13-cv-02093-TLN-DB Document 162 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE 

APPLICATIONS TO MODIFY BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS 

AND FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

1

ORDER

The Court, having considered Plaintiff Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s 

(“FERC” or “Commission”) Ex Parte Application to Modify Briefing Page Limits in Reply to 

Defendants’ February 1, 2016 Oppositions to Plaintiff’s Motion to Affirm Penalties and the 

Commission’s Ex Parte Application for an Extension of Time to Reply to Defendants’ February 

1, 2016 Oppositions to Plaintiff’s Motion to Affirm Penalties, lack of any opposition thereto and 

otherwise being fully advised hereby finds good cause shown and GRANTS the Commission’s

Applications. It is hereby ORDERED that:

1. FERC may file a brief in reply to Defendants’ Oppositions to Plaintiff’s Motion to 

Affirm Penalties, not to exceed fifty (50) briefing pages.

2. FERC is provided with an additional twenty-five (25) days to file its reply. 

FERC’s reply is now due by March 18, 2016, within forty-six (46) days of Defendants’ filing 

their opposition briefs.

3. The hearing on the Commission’s Motion to Affirm Penalties, currently noticed 

and calendared for March 10, 2016, is continued and re-scheduled for April 21, 2016. 

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: February 5, 2016 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 

COMMISSION

By: /s/ Maria Cristina Melendez

MARIA CRISTINA MELENDEZ

DAVID APPLEBAUM

WESLEY J. HEATH

EMILY C. SCRUGGS

ANDREW PAUL TAMAYO

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2016

Case 2:13-cv-02093-TLN-DB Document 162 Filed 02/12/16 Page 2 of 2