Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05057/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05057-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 310
Nature of Suit: Airplane Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal 

Case No: CV 13 5057 MEJ (EDL) 

Richard G. Grotch, Esq. – SBN 127713 

Gina J. Beltramo, Esq. – SBN 203809 

CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH 

A Professional Corporation, Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300 

Redwood City, CA 94065-2133 

Telephone: (650) 592-5400 

Facsimile: (650) 592-5027 

Email: rgrotch@chdlawyers.com

ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant 

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RUFUS MERCER, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. C 13-5057 MEJ (EDL) 

STIPULATION FOR ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

OF DISMISSAL [FRCP 41(a)(1)] 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff RUFUS MERCER and 

defendant SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., by their respective counsel of record, that all the 

claims of plaintiff RUFUS MERCER, be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) 

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear his or its own attorneys’ fees 

and costs of suit. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:13-cv-05057-MEJ Document 49 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal 

Case No: CV 13 5057 MEJ (EDL) 

 SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: November 23, 2015 BARLOW LAW

/s/ Patricia Barlow

By: 

Patricia Barlow 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Rufus Mercer 

Dated: November 23, 2015 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH 

/s/ Richard G. Grotch

By: 

Richard G. Grotch (*) 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Southwest Airlines Co. 

(*) I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph 

signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/s/) within 

this e-filed document, or have been expressly 

authorized to affix all “conformed” signatures. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Upon the parties’ stipulation, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the claims of plaintiff RUFUS MERCER be, and 

hereby are, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, with each party to bear his or its own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit. 

Dated: November __, 2015 __________________________________ 

 Honorable Maria-Elena James 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:13-cv-05057-MEJ Document 49 Filed 11/23/15 Page 2 of 2