Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00949/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00949-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT EDWARD DAHL, JR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TIMOTHY VIRGA, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-0949 AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned 

magistrate judge for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 305(a). See ECF 

No. 4. By order filed August 7, 2015, this court requested, for the second time, that the Office of 

the California Attorney General (AG) contact officials at the California Department of 

Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), to determine the location of plaintiff’s missing property. 

See ECF No. 27. The AG timely filed a supplemental response on August 28, 2015, which 

indicated that plaintiff had received all of his property. See ECF No. 28. 

 The court’s August 7, 2015 order also dismissed plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint 

with leave to amend, directed plaintiff to review the AG’s supplemental response and then, if 

dissatisfied, to file a Third Amended Complaint by October 1, 2015. See ECF No. 27 at 3. 

Plaintiff was informed that “failure to timely file a Third Amended Complaint will result in the 

Case 2:14-cv-00949-AC Document 29 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

dismissal of this action without prejudice.” Id. 

The time for filing a Third Amended Complaint has expired and plaintiff has not 

communicated with court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed 

without prejudice. 

DATED: October 13, 2015 

Case 2:14-cv-00949-AC Document 29 Filed 10/14/15 Page 2 of 2