Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00246/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00246-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Brady K. Armstrong is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On June 16, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s May 9, 2014, 

order denying his request for an extension of time as unnecessary. Plaintiff contends that prison 

officials have withheld his legal property after he paroled from prison on April 18, 2014. Plaintiff 

seeks a court order directing the return of his legal property. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 30, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 

Recommendation which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that 

Objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within twenty days. No Objections 

were filed. 

///

BRADY K. ARMSTRONG,

 Plaintiff,

v.

M.E. SPEARMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00246-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION AND/OR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

[ECF Nos. 45, 46]

Case 1:13-cv-00246-AWI-SAB Document 50 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on June 30, 2014, is adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and/or request for a preliminary injunction is 

DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 4, 2014 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00246-AWI-SAB Document 50 Filed 09/04/14 Page 2 of 2