Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-60/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO.,

LTD.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MEDIATEK, INC., et al.,

Defendants 

MEDIATEK, INC,

Counterclaimant,

 v.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO.,

LTD., et al.

Counterclaim Defendants

 /

No. C 05-3148 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO FILE IN

PUBLIC RECORD CORRECTED

DECLARATION OF BRIAN C. CANNON;

On April 7, 2007, defendants filed, without redaction, the Declaration of Brian C.

Cannon. On April 19, 2007, defendants filed a redacted version of the “Corrected

Declaration of Brian C. Cannon” (“Corrected Declaration”) and submitted to the Clerk, in a

sealed envelope, the unredacted version of the Corrected Declaration.

Defendants have failed to file a motion for leave to file under seal the unredacted

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 728 Filed 04/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

On April 19, 2007, defendants filed a “Supplemental Unopposed Administrative

Motion Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(b) to File Confidential Documents Under

Seal,” in which defendants seek leave to file under seal unredacted versions of various

documents. Although defendants, by said motion, seek leave to file under seal various

exhibits attached to the Corrected Declaration, defendants do not request leave to file

under seal the Corrected Declaration itself. By separate order filed concurrently herewith,

the Court has addressed defendants’ motion to file under seal certain exhibits attached to

the Corrected Declaration.

2

As noted, defendants have sought leave to file under seal certain exhibits attached

to the Corrected Declaration. The titles and/or descriptions of such exhibits as set forth in

the Corrected Declaration do not disclose the substantive content of any such exhibit.

2

version of the Corrected Declaration.1 Moreover, the entirety of the material redacted from

the Corrected Declaration is included in the Declaration of Brian C. Cannon, which, as

noted, was filed without redaction on April 7, 2007. Further, the redacted matter in the

Corrected Declaration consists wholly of titles or descriptive references to exhibits attached

to the Corrected Declaration.2 Under such circumstances, the Court declines to file under

seal the unredacted version of the Corrected Declaration.

Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to file in the public record the five-page

Corrected Declaration of Brian C. Cannon.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 25, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 728 Filed 04/25/07 Page 2 of 2