Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00379/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00379-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:160(1) National Labor Relations Act

---

ORDER 1

JENNIFER A. JAMBOR (CSB No. 218363)

LEONARD CARDER, LLP

1330 Broadway, Suite 1450

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 272-0169

Facsimile: (510) 272-0174

Attorneys for Proposed Amicus Curiae

INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND 

WAREHOUSE UNION LOCAL 17

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO

JOSEPH P. NORELLI, Regional Director of the

Twentieth Region of the National Labor

Relations Board, for and on behalf of the

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

 Petitioner

vs.

CALIFORNIA ALMOND GROWERS, d/b/a

BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS,

 Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:06-CV-00379-FCD-KJM

ORDER

Case 2:06-cv-00379-FCD-KJM Document 16 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 2
ORDER 2

Based upon the authorities submitted by Proposed Amicus Curiae International

Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 17 (“Local 17") in support of its Application for Leave

to Participate as Amicus Curiae, said Application is hereby GRANTED. Local 17 shall have the

right to submit evidence and briefs, as well as to present oral argument through counsel, in

connection with the petition for temporary injunctive relief filed by the National Labor Relations

Board (“NLRB”) in this matter. Should any injunctive relief issue in this action, Local 17 shall

enjoy the same rights in connection with any contempt proceeding which the NLRB may choose

to institute, as well as in connection with any motion by Respondent to dissolve or modify such

an injunction. Should witness testimony be permitted in connection with any petition or motion

by the NLRB or Respondent, counsel for Local 17 shall also have the right to call, examine and

cross examine witnesses. Local 17 has not sought, and is not entitled to, intervention as a party

in this action, and therefore may not vary the theory of violation being advanced by the NLRB,

nor initiate any appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 19, 2006 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00379-FCD-KJM Document 16 Filed 04/19/06 Page 2 of 2