Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01789/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01789-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Best Western International, Inc.,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Robert W. Ridenour and Jane Doe 

Ridenour; and Ridenour Edwards 

Management I, Ltd., 

Defendants.

No. CV-10-1789-PHX-DGC

ORDER AND 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT 

 Best Western International, Inc. is a non-profit corporation consisting of 

individually owned hotels that operate under the “Best Western” mark. The rights and 

duties of Best Western and its members are created and governed by a membership 

agreement, which incorporates by reference certain bylaws and rules and regulations. 

The membership agreement permits the Best Western Board of Directors to terminate a 

member hotel for failure to pay amounts due or meet certain quality and design standards. 

 In September 1994, Robert Ridenour and Ridenour Edwards Management I, Ltd. 

(collectively, “Ridenour”) executed a membership agreement with Best Western. 

Pursuant to that agreement, Ridenour began operating a hotel in Oklahoma named the 

Best Western Inn of Miami. Best Western terminated the membership effective 

November 30, 2009. 

 Best Western filed a complaint against Ridenour on August 20, 2010, asserting 

various state and federal law claims arising from Ridenour’s alleged unlawful use of Best 

Case 2:10-cv-01789-DGC Document 16 Filed 03/24/11 Page 1 of 4
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Western’s marks and alleged failure to pay monies owed to Best Western. The complaint 

asserts ten claims: breach of contract, open account, stated account, breach of contract – 

post termination use of trademarks, federal trademark infringement, federal false 

designation of origin and unfair competition, federal trademark dilution, unfair 

competition under Arizona law, trademark dilution under Arizona law, and common law 

trademark infringement. Best Western seeks damages, injunctive relief, and attorneys’ 

fees and costs. Doc. 1. 

 Best Western has filed a motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 15. Best Western seeks default judgment (1) on 

counts one, two, and three in the amount of $33,621.60, plus interest, (2) on count four in 

the amount of $293,638.08, and (3) on counts five through ten, for permanent injunctive 

relief relating to the use of the Best Western marks. Id. at 9-11. Best Western also seeks, 

pursuant to the terms of the membership agreement and A.R.S. § 12-341.01, an award of 

attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $3,231.63. Id. at 8-9; Doc. 15-11. For reasons 

that follow, the Court will grant the motion in part. 

 Because Ridenour’s default has been entered under Rule 55(a) (Doc. 13), the 

Court has discretion to grant default judgment against Ridenour pursuant to Rule 55(b). 

See Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980); Draper v. Coombs, 792 F.2d 

915, 924 (9th Cir. 1986). Factors to be considered in deciding whether to grant default 

judgment include (1) the possibility of prejudice to Best Western, (2) the merits of the 

claims, (3) the sufficiency of the complaint, (4) the amount of money at stake, (5) the 

possibility of a dispute concerning material facts, (6) whether default was due to 

excusable neglect, and (7) the policy favoring a decision on the merits. See Eitel v. 

McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986). 

 Having considered Best Western’s motion, which addresses each Eitel factor 

(Doc. 15 at 4-8), and having reviewed the supporting affidavits and documents provided 

by Best Western (Docs. 15-1 through 15-11), the Court concludes that default judgment 

Case 2:10-cv-01789-DGC Document 16 Filed 03/24/11 Page 2 of 4
- 3 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

is appropriate. See, e.g., Best W. Int’l, Inc. v. Universal Hospitality, Inc., No. CV-08-91-

PHX-DGC, 2008 WL 20003784 (D. Ariz. May 8, 2008) (granting default judgment 

against former member-hotel). The Court will grant default judgment on counts one, 

two, and three of the complaint in the amount of $33,621.60, plus interest (Docs. 1 ¶¶ 

35-50, 15-2 ¶ 8, 15-3 at 3), grant injunctive relief on counts five through ten (Docs. 1 ¶¶ 

58-94, 15-2 ¶ 9), and award Best Western $3,231.63 in attorneys’ fees and costs (Docs. 1 

¶ 42, 15-11). 

 With respect to count four, post termination use of trademarks, Best Western seeks 

liquidated damages in the amount of $293,638.08. Doc. 15 at 7-9. This amount 

represents $766.68 per day (15% of the average room rate multiplied by the number of 

rooms) for 383 days – from December 15, 2009 until January 3, 2011, the date the 

motion for default judgment was prepared (see Docs. 15 at 8, 15-2 at 4). The evidence, 

however, shows the continued use of Best Western marks only until June 9, 2010. Doc. 

15-9. Best Western has presented no evidence showing infringement after that date. Best 

Western therefore is entitled to liquidated damages for a total of 175 days – from 

December 15, 2009 through June 9, 2010. At the per diem rate of $766.68, this amounts 

to $134,169.00. The Court will grant default judgment on count four in this amount. 

IT IS ORDERED:

 1. Plaintiff Best Western International, Inc.’s motion for default judgment 

(Doc. 15) is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in this order. 

 2. Default judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants 

Robert Ridenour and Ridenour Edwards Management I, Ltd. on counts one, two, and 

three of the complaint in the amount of $33,621.60, plus interest at the rate of 1.5% per 

month from December 15, 2009 until paid in full. 

 3. Default judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants on 

count four in the amount of $134,169.00. 

 4. Default judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants on 

Case 2:10-cv-01789-DGC Document 16 Filed 03/24/11 Page 3 of 4
- 4 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

counts five through ten. 

 5. Defendants, and any person or entity acting on their behalf or in concert with 

them, are permanently enjoined from using, or authorizing, licensing, assisting, or 

facilitating any person’s or entity’s use of, the Best Western marks, any colorable 

imitation thereof, or any other confusingly similar mark. 

 6. Defendants shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, remove all Best 

Western marks used in connection with the subject hotel located in Miami, Oklahoma. 

 7. Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $3,231.63. 

 8. The joint motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction 

(Doc. 3) is denied as moot. 

 9. The claims asserted against Defendant Jane Doe Ridenour are dismissed. 

 10. The Clerk is directed to termination this action. 

 Dated this 24th day of March, 2011. 

 

Case 2:10-cv-01789-DGC Document 16 Filed 03/24/11 Page 4 of 4