Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-05865/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-05865-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C03-05865 SBA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HARVEY SISKIND JACOBS LLP

D. PETER HARVEY (Bar No. 55712)

Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-4115

Telephone: (415) 354-0100

Facsimile: (415) 391-7124

BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP

MARK E. FERGUSON (pro hac vice)

MARK L. LEVINE (pro hac vice)

54 W. Hubbard Street, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60610-4697

Telephone: (312) 494-4400

Facsimile: (312) 494-4440

Attorneys for Plaintiff SAFECLICK, LLC

STANLEY YOUNG (Bar. No. 121180)

MICHAEL M. MARKMAN (Bar No. 191388)

HELLER EHRMAN LLP

275 Middlefield Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025-3506

Telephone: (650) 324-7000

Facsimile: (650) 324-0638

michael.markman@hellerehrman.com

Attorneys for Defendants VISA U.S.A. INC. and

VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

SAFECLICK, LLC, an Iowa limited liability 

company,

Plaintiff,

vs.

VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE 

ASSOCIATION., a Delaware corporation, and 

VISA U.S.A. INC., a Delaware corporation,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C03-05865 SBA ADR

STIPULATION AND ORDER RENOTICING HEARING DATE ON VISA’S 

LIMITED MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

Date: December 13, 2005

Judge: Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong

Dept.: Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor

Case 4:03-cv-05865-SBA Document 149 Filed 10/03/05 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C03-05865 SBA

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties have met and conferred in good faith regarding whether recent discovery 

makes it necessary to revise the case management schedule. On September 13, 2005, the parties 

submitted a joint motion to amend case management order and proposed amended case 

management order. The Court’s clerk asked the parties to modify certain dates in the proposed 

amended case management order and asked the parties to submit a revised joint motion. The 

parties are presently conferring regarding possible dates and anticipate that they will submit an 

agreed-upon revised joint motion later this week. The parties nevertheless wish to re-confirm 

and stipulate that the hearing date of September 20, 2005 on the limited motion for summary 

judgment of non-infringement brought by defendants Visa U.S.A., Inc. and Visa International 

Service Association (collectively “Visa”) is vacated. Visa re-notices its limited motion for 

summary judgment to December 13, 2005.

Dated: September 19, 2005 /s/ Adam K. Mortara

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: September 19, 2005 /s/ Michael M. Markman 

Attorney for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October __3__, 2005 ________________________________

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:03-cv-05865-SBA Document 149 Filed 10/03/05 Page 2 of 2