Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01678/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01678-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL McCARTNEY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF )

CORRECTIONS, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-CV-01678 OWW SMS HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #12]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On January 29, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for failure to comply with a

court order. Specifically, Petitioner failed to submit a completed application to proceed in forma

pauperis or pay the filing fee as ordered by the Court on December 14, 2006. The Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within ten court days (plus three days for mailing) of the date

of service of the order. The time for filing objections has passed and no party has objected.

Case 1:06-cv-01678-OWW -SMS Document 18 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued January 29, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; 

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 25, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01678-OWW -SMS Document 18 Filed 02/26/07 Page 2 of 2