Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04839/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04839-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BV RIGHTS ANSTALT,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ABAXIS INC,

Defendant. /

No. C-04-04839 SC (EDL)

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE

On January 18, 2006, the parties called the Court regarding a discovery dispute that had

arisen at the beginning of the videotaped deposition of Plaintiff’s representative regarding: (1) the

spacing of the video camera with respect to the witness; and (2) which parties would be captured on

video. The Court held a telephonic hearing in this matter on January 18, 2006.

For the reasons stated at the hearing, Defendant shall move the camera away from the

witness by one to two additional feet. Plaintiff’s objection that the videotape will only show the

deponent is overruled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 20, 2006 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-04839-SC Document 84 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 1