Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03868/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03868-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

Case No.: 14-CV-03868-LHK

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

LAUREL BRESAZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 14-CV-03868-LHK 

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: James McManis, Christine Peek, Jennifer Murakami

Defendants’ Attorneys: Stephen Schmid, Melissa Kiniyalocts

A case management conference was held on June 3, 2015. A further case management 

conference is set for August 5, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their joint case 

management statement by July 29, 2015.

For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Second Amended 

Complaint (ECF No. 42) was GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file their Second Amended Complaint 

by today, June 3, 2015. The October 1, 2015 hearing previously set for that motion shall be 

reserved for a hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. 

The parties shall agree to a briefing schedule for Defendants’ motion, so long as the Reply is filed 

on or before September 1, 2015.

For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiffs were ORDERED to: (1) produce Mr. 

Marshall’s cell phone records from December 8, 2013, through December 10, 2013; (2) reproduce 

copies of Mr. Marshall’s prior wills; and (3) consult with Mr. Dean Harvey regarding Defendants’

Case 5:14-cv-03868-LHK Document 68 Filed 06/03/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 14-CV-03868-LHK

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

request for Mr. Marshall’s deposition transcript from the High-Tech class action litigation. 

Plaintiffs shall serve on Defendants a written demand for settlement of this case by June 

30, 2015. The parties are referred to Magistrate Judge Spero for a settlement conference with a 

deadline of September 30, 2015. The parties shall file a Joint Settlement Status Report with this 

Court by October 15, 2015.

The case schedule remains as previously set. For the convenience of the parties, the 

schedule is set forth below:

FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: January 21, 2016

EXPERT DISCOVERY: 

Opening Reports: February 4, 2016

Rebuttal Reports: March 3, 2016

Close of Expert Discovery: March 31, 2016

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS shall be filed by April 28, 2016, and set for hearing no later than June 

9, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are limited to one dispositive motion per side in the entire 

case. 

FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: August 4, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.

JURY TRIAL: August 22, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. Trial is expected to last 14 days. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 3, 2015 ________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-03868-LHK Document 68 Filed 06/03/15 Page 2 of 2