Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02206/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02206-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Scott Johnson, 

Plaintiff,

v.

Extra Space Properties 

Seventy Four, LLC, a Delaware 

Corporation; Salvador 

Maldonado Pena; and Does 1-

10;

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-02206-GEB-KJN

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND 

DISPOSITION

Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Settlement” on November 

20, 2015, in which he states:

The plaintiff hereby notifies the court 

that a global settlement has been reached in 

the above-captioned case and the parties 

would like to avoid any additional expense, 

and to further the interests of judicial 

economy.

The plaintiff, therefore, [requests] to 

vacate all currently set dates with the 

expectation that the Joint Stipulation for 

Dismissal with prejudice as to all parties 

will be filed within 60 days.

(Notice of Settlement, ECF No. 5.)

Therefore, a dispositional document shall be filed no 

later than January 19, 2016. Failure to respond by this deadline 

may be construed as consent to dismissal of this action without 

prejudice, and a dismissal order could be filed. See E.D. Cal. 

Case 2:15-cv-02206-MCE-KJN Document 6 Filed 11/25/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

R. 160(b) (“A failure to file dispositional papers on the date 

prescribed by the Court may be grounds for sanctions.”).

Further, the Status Conference scheduled for hearing on 

January 19, 2016, is continued to commence at 9:00 a.m. on 

February 29, 2016, in the event no dispositional document is 

filed, or if this action is not otherwise dismissed.1 A joint 

status report shall be filed fourteen (14) days prior to the 

status conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 25, 2015

 

1 The status conference will remain on calendar, because the mere 

representation that a case has been settled does not justify vacating a 

scheduling proceeding. Cf. Callie v. Near, 829 F.2d 888, 890 (9th Cir. 1987)

(indicating that a representation that claims have been settled does not 

necessarily establish the existence of a binding settlement agreement). 

Case 2:15-cv-02206-MCE-KJN Document 6 Filed 11/25/15 Page 2 of 2