Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04570/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04570-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTINA GARMAN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SERVICES,

INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-04570 JSW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This matter is set for a hearing on March 5, 2010 on the motion for leave to amend filed

by plaintiff Kristina Garman (“Plaintiff”). Pursuant to Local Civil Rule of the Northern District

7-3, an opposition or statement of non-opposition to a motion was due to be filed and served by

February 12, 2010. To date, defendant Diversified Collection Services, Inc. (“Defendant”) has

not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition. 

Defendant is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE (“OSC”) in writing, by

February 19, 2010, why the pending motion for leave to amend should not be granted as

unopposed in light of Defendant’s failure to file a timely opposition or statement of nonopposition. If Defendant seek to file a substantive response to Plaintiff’s motion, Defendant

must demonstrate good cause for failing to file its opposition brief in a timely fashion. If

Defendant fails to file a response to this Order to Show Cause on or before February 5, 2010,

the Court shall deem the motion to remand to be unopposed and shall rule on it without

Case 3:09-cv-04570-JSW Document 20 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

further notice to Defendant.

If Defendant seek to file a substantive response to Plaintiff’s motion and demonstrates

good cause for its delay, the Court will provide Plaintiff an opportunity to file a reply brief. The

hearing on Plaintiff’s motion remains set for March 5, 2010, unless otherwise ordered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-04570-JSW Document 20 Filed 02/16/10 Page 2 of 2