Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02653/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02653-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re Extension of Time, etc. Case No. C06-02653 EDL 

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JACOB APPELSMITH

Senior Assistant Attorney General

FIEL D. TIGNO

MIGUEL A. NERI

Supervising Deputy Attorneys General

MARJORIE E. COX, State Bar No. 084536

Deputy Attorney General

 1515 Clay Street, Suite 2000

 P.O. Box 70550

 Oakland, CA 94612-0550

Telephone: (510) 622-2148

Facsimile: (510) 622-2121

Email: Marjorie.Cox@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

JERRY R. JOLLY, Director

California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTHING TO IT!!!, LLC, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

JERRY R. JOLLY, Director of the California

Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control,

Defendant.

Case No.: C06-02653 EDL

STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED ORDER]

RE: EXTENSION OF

TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

TO COMPLY WITH FRCP

RULES 26(a)(1) AND 26(f)

By and through their respective attorneys of record, plaintiffs Nothing To It!!!, LLC, et al. and

defendant Jerry R. Jolly, in his capacity as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage

Control, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. The time within which defendant shall respond to the First Amended Complaint shall be

extended by one week, from the current due date of July 11, 2006 to July 18, 2006.

2. The times within which the parties shall comply with the requirements of Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) [meet and confer re, and complete, initial disclosures and discovery plan]

and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) [file Rule 26(f) report] shall also be extended to July 18,

Case 3:06-cv-02653-MJJ Document 13 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re Extension of Time, etc. Case No. C06-02653 EDL 

2006.

GOOD CAUSE exists, as follows, for approval of the extensions of time sought pursuant to this

stipulation:

1. Until recently, the parties expected a decision to issue shortly in a related case pending

before the District Court for the Central District of California that would provide a basis for

resolution of this case pursuant to stipulation.

2. Due to the recent, unexpected dismissal of this related action, the parties have resumed

discussion of how this case might best be promptly and efficiently resolved.

3. The requested extensions will allow the parties to continue these discussions without

prejudicing their respective positions in the litigation or delaying its resolution.

Dated: June 26, 2006 EPSTEIN, COHEN, DONAHOE & MENDES

By: /s/ Robert D. Epstein 

 ROBERT D. EPSTEIN

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: June 26, 2006 BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JACOB APPELSMITH

Senior Assistant Attorney General

FIEL D. TIGNO

MIGUEL A. NERI

Supervising Deputy Attorneys General

 /s/ Marjorie E. Cox 

MARJORIE E. COX

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendant

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June , 2006

 

District Court Judge

28 Magistrate Elizabeth D. Laporte

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:06-cv-02653-MJJ Document 13 Filed 06/28/06 Page 2 of 2