Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04435/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04435-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOREXPEDITEDBRIEFINGSCHEDULEONMORRISON’S

MOTION TO QUASH; NO. C 06-04435 CRB

1

RICHARD MARMARO (Bar No. 91387)

rmarmaro@skadden.com

JACK P. DICANIO (Bar No. 138782)

jdicanio@skadden.com

RONDA J. MCKAIG (Bar No. 216267)

rmckaig@skadden.com

RYAN H. WEINSTEIN (Bar No. 240405)

rweinste@skadden.com

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP

300 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, California 90071-3144

Tel: (213) 687-5000

Fax: (213) 687-5600

Attorneys for Defendant Gregory L. Reyes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GREGORY L. REYES, ANTONIO CANOVA,

and STEPHANIE JENSEN

Defendants.

CASE NO. C 06-04435 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR

MOTION TO QUASH OF MORRISON &

FOERSTER

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 69 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOREXPEDITEDBRIEFINGSCHEDULEONMORRISON’S

MOTION TO QUASH; NO. C 06-04435 CRB

2

STIPULATION

Defendant Gregory L. Reyes and third party Morrison & Foerster(“Morrison”),by and

through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS

1. Mr. Reyes served Morrison with a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition subpoena and a

document subpoena in November and December of 2006; and

2. Morrison filed a motion to quash both subpoenas on December 22, 2006; and

3. The parties previously agreed that the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Morrison would

go forward on February 6, 2007, after the issues in the motion to quash had been resolved by the

Court; and

4. TheCourtdeniedMorrison’smotiontoquashwithout prejudice on January 5,

2007, and ordered Morrison to file an amended motion by January 12, 2007; and

5. An expedited briefing schedule is needed so that the Court can rule on the issues

raisedbyMorrison’smotiontoquash,andtheRule30(b)(6)depositioncanstillgoforwardas

scheduled on February 6, 2007.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that,subjecttotheCourt’sapproval,thebriefingschedule

and hearing will be as follows:

1. January 12, 2007 –Morrison will file and serve its motion to quash

2. January 18, 2007 –Mr. Reyes will file and serve his opposition

3. January 24, 2007 –Morrison will file and serve its reply brief

4. January 26, 2007 –the hearing on the motion will take place at 10:00 a.m.

DATED: January 9, 2007 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL, LLP

By: /s/

Douglas R. Young

Attorneys for Morrison & Foerster LLP

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 69 Filed 01/11/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOREXPEDITEDBRIEFINGSCHEDULEONMORRISON’S

MOTION TO QUASH; NO. C 06-04435 CRB

3

DATED: January 9, 2007 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP

By: /s/

Ronda J. McKaig

Attorneys for Defendant Gregory L. Reyes

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________________________

Charles R. Breyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

January 10, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 69 Filed 01/11/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOREXPEDITEDBRIEFINGSCHEDULEONMORRISON’S

MOTION TO QUASH; NO. C 06-04435 CRB

4

I, Richard Marmaro, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to

file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR

MOTION TO QUASH OF MORRISON & FOERSTER. In compliance with General Order

45.X.B., I hereby attest that each of the signatories have concurred in this filing.

DATED: January 9, 2007 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER

& FLOM LLP

/s/ Richard Marmaro

Richard Marmaro

Case 3:06-cv-04435-CRB Document 69 Filed 01/11/07 Page 4 of 4