Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01004/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01004-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE

- 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, ESQ., SBN 96625

J. MIGUEL FLORES, ESQ., SBN 240535

RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 

2020 EYE STREET

BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301

TELEPHONE (661) 323-1400 FAX (661) 323-0132

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARIA D. CHAVEZ, 

individually and as the successor in interest of 

CHRISTIAN CHAVEZ, Deceased

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIA D. CHAVEZ and RENE 

CHAVEZ, individually and as the 

Successors-in-Interest of CHRISTIAN 

CHAVEZ, Deceased

Plaintiffs,

vs.

COUNTY OF KERN, TOMMY J. 

ROBINS , JEREMY STORAR, and DOES 

1 to 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:12-cv-01004 JLT

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CONTINUING FINAL PRETRIAL 

CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE

(Doc. 46)

///

///

Case 1:12-cv-01004-JLT Document 47 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 4
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE

- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff MARIA D. CHAVEZ and Defendants COUNTY OF KERN, TOMMY J. 

ROBINS, and JEREMY STORAR, constituting all the parties appearing in this action, 

through undersigned counsel of record hereby stipulate to continue the Final Pretrial 

Conference from June 4, 2014 to December 10, 2014 and further stipulate to continue 

Trial from July 29, 2014 to February 9, 2015.

Reasons For The Continuance.

Daniel Rodriguez is the lead trial attorney at Rodriguez & Associates. Mr.

Rodriguez will be the lead trial attorney in this matter that is currently scheduled for trial 

on July 29, 2014. Mr. Rodriguez has a pre-paid vacation scheduled from July 23, 2014 

through August 4, 2014 and will be out of the country. Mr. Rodriguez’ trial schedule is 

filled until late January 2015. 

The parties have completed discovery in this matter and are not requesting that 

discovery be re-openend. Dispositive motions have been filed and have been decided by 

the Court. 

The parties would also like to explore the resolution of the matter before trial. 

Now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all the parties to 

this action as follows:

1. That the Final Pretrial Conference, currently set for June 4, 2014, be continued

to December 10, 2014; and

2. That Trial in this action, currently set for July 29, 2014, be continued to 

February 9, 2015.

SO STIPULATED:

Case 1:12-cv-01004-JLT Document 47 Filed 04/21/14 Page 2 of 4
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE

- 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: April 18, 2014 RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES

By: _/J/ Miguel Flores ___________

J. MIGUEL FLORES

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: April 18, 2014 THERESA A. GOLDNER, COUNTY COUNSEL

By: _/s/__ Mark L. Nations ______________

Mark L. Nations, Chief Deputy

Attorneys for Defendants County of Kern, 

Tommy J. Robins and Jeremy Storar

Case 1:12-cv-01004-JLT Document 47 Filed 04/21/14 Page 3 of 4
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE

- 4 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Based on the Joint Stipulation of the parties, the Court ORDERS1:

1. The pretrial conference currently set on June 4, 2014, is continued to 

December 10, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.;

2. The jury trial currently set on July 29, 2014, is continued to February 17, 

2015 at 8:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 18, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

1 The time suggested for the pretrial conference conflicts with the Court’s calendar as does the day proposed for trial. Thus,

the Court’s changes are noted in bold.

Case 1:12-cv-01004-JLT Document 47 Filed 04/21/14 Page 4 of 4