Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00120/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00120-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED RULE 502(d) ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

COSTA MESA

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Barbara J. Miller, Bar No. 167223

Roberta H. Kuehne, Bar No. 225067

Joel M. Purles, Bar No. 266208

600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1800

Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7653

Tel: +1.714.830.0600

Fax: +1.714.830.0700

barbara.miller@morganlewis.com

roberta.kuehne@morganlewis.com

joel.purles@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendants

GOLDEN STATE FC LLC and AMAZON.COM, INC.

Peter R. Dion-Kindem, Bar No. 95267

The Dion-Kindem Law Firm

Peter R. Dion-Kindem, P.C.

21550 Oxnard Street, Suite 900

Woodland Hills, CA 91367

Tel: +1.818.883.4900

Fax: +1.714.830.0700

peter@dion-kindemlaw.com

Lonnie C. Blanchard, III, Bar No. 93530

The Blanchard Law Group, APC

3311 East Pico Boulevard

Los Angeles, CA 90023

Tel: +1.213.599.8255

Fax: +1.213.402.3949

lonnieblanchard@gmail.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JUAN TREVINO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN TREVINO, an individual, on behalf of 

himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GOLDEN STATE FC, LLC, a Delaware 

Limited Liability Company; AMAZON.COM,

INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 

through 10,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:18-cv-00120-DAD-MJS

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED FEDERAL 

RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(D) ORDER 

Complaint Filed: July 12, 2017

Case 1:18-cv-00120-KES-BAM Document 19 Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 3
2

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED RULE 502(d) ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

COSTA MESA

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Juan Trevino on 

behalf of himself and all others similarly situated (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Golden State FC 

LLC and Amazon.com, Inc. (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their 

respective counsel of record, in order to allow the Parties to respond to discovery expeditiously 

while limiting discovery costs, hereby stipulate for an order pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 

502(d) that states:

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d), neither the attorney-client privilege nor the 

work product protection is waived by disclosure of such information in this litigation. The 

production of privileged or work product protected documents, whether in electronically stored 

information or other materials, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection in this case or in any 

other federal or state proceeding. If any privileged or work product protected documents are 

produced, the party receiving produced documents (“Receiving Party”) shall, at the request of the 

party producing those documents (“Producing Party”), promptly return such documents (and all 

copies thereof), including all later created excerpts, summaries, compilations, and other 

documents or records that include, communicate, or reveal the information claimed to be 

privileged or protected. A Receiving Party who receives a document that it knows or reasonably 

should know is privileged shall notify the Producing Party within 3 business days of discovery of 

the document.

Nothing in this Order overrides any attorney’s ethical responsibilities to refrain from 

examining or disclosing materials that the attorney knows or reasonably should know to be 

privileged and to inform the Producing Party that such materials have been produced.

Nothing in this Order is intended to or shall serve to limit a party’s right to conduct a 

review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness 

and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production.

The provisions of Federal Rule of Evidence 502(b)(2) are inapplicable to the production 

of protected information under this Order.

This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal 

Rule of Evidence 502(d).

Case 1:18-cv-00120-KES-BAM Document 19 Filed 03/12/18 Page 2 of 3
3

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED RULE 502(d) ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

COSTA MESA

The obligations imposed by this Rule 502(d) Order shall survive the termination of this 

action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 12, 2018

PETER R. DION-KINDEM, P.C.

By /s/ Peter R. Dion-Kindem

Peter R. Dion-Kindem

Attorney for Plaintiff

JUAN TREVINO

Dated: March 12, 2018 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

By /s/ Roberta H. Kuehne

Barbara J. Miller

Roberta H. Kuehne

Joel M. Purles

Attorneys for Defendants

GOLDEN STATE FC LLC and AMAZON.COM, INC.

I attest that I have obtained Peter R. Dion-Kindem’s concurrence in the filing of this 

document.

/s/ Roberta H. Kuehne

Roberta H. Kuehne

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 12, 2018 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:18-cv-00120-KES-BAM Document 19 Filed 03/12/18 Page 3 of 3