Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00638/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00638-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN MONTUE, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-0638 FCD KJM P

vs.

EDWARD ALAMEIDA, et al., 

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prison inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983, in which he alleges prison officials at California State Prison Folsom enacted

policies that exacerbated racial and ethnic tensions among inmates.

On August 29, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, seeking

to enjoin prison officials at the California Medical Facility from transferring him and to compel

them to provide certain treatment. The individuals against whom he seeks to proceed are not

named as defendants in this action. This court is unable to issue an order against individuals who

are not parties to a suit pending before it. See Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.,

395 U.S. 100, 112 (1969). 

//////

/////

Case 2:02-cv-00638-FCD-KJM Document 27 Filed 10/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s August 29, 2005

request for a preliminary injunction be denied.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: October 20, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

mont0638.49a

Case 2:02-cv-00638-FCD-KJM Document 27 Filed 10/21/05 Page 2 of 2