Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01605/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01605-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sonic Supply, LLC 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Universal White Cement Company, Inc., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-1605-PHX-ROS

ORDER

On July 20, 2009, Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson issued a Report and

Recommendation recommending the parties be calendared for a Rule 16 Scheduling

Conference (Doc. 73). Both parties failed to file timely objections. 

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is “clear that the

district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if

objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1126 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not otherwise.’”). District

courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject

Case 2:08-cv-01605-LOA Document 74 Filed 08/10/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). No objection having been

made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in full.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 73) is ADOPTED.

FURTHER ORDERED a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference will be set with an Order

to follow.

DATED this 10th day of August, 2009.

Case 2:08-cv-01605-LOA Document 74 Filed 08/10/09 Page 2 of 2