Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00926/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00926-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The purpose of said extension is to permit Defendant to respond in its Reply

memorandum to Plaintiff’s substantive legal arguments and to detail its objections to the

Plaintiff’s assertions of fact. Plaintiff filed a 32 page statement of facts, which includes no less

than 185 distinct assertions of claimed fact. Defendant claims that many of these assertions of

fact are objectionable on various grounds, and under Ninth Circuit law, Defendant must set forth

its objections or be deemed to have waived them. 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission,

Plaintiff,

v.

AutoZone, Inc., a Nevada corporation, 

Defendant _________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 06-926-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Upon the motion (Doc. 105) of Defendant AutoZone, Inc., for leave to exceed by nine

pages the limit set forth in LRCiv 7.2(e) for Defendant’s Reply memorandum in support of its

Motion for Summary Judgment, and good cause therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING Defendant’s motion (Doc. 105). Defendant

may exceed by nine pages the limit set forth in LRCiv 7.2(e) for its Reply memorandum in

support of its Motion for Summary Judgment.1

DATED this 10th day of July, 2008.

Case 2:06-cv-00926-SMM Document 106 Filed 07/10/08 Page 1 of 1