Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02522/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02522-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL AARON JAYNE,

Plaintiff, No. 2:07-cv- 2522 KJN P

vs.

SPRINT PCS, INC., et. al., 

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed February 3, 2010, this court directed plaintiff to file, by February

26, 2010, an opposition, if any, to defendants' October 14, 2009 motion for summary judgment. 

That date has since passed, and plaintiff has not filed an opposition or otherwise responded to the

court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants' October 14,

2009 motion for summary judgment be granted and this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

See Local Rule 11-110.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

Case 2:07-cv-02522-LKK -KJN Document 114 Filed 03/17/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 16, 2010

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

jayn.2522.dism

Case 2:07-cv-02522-LKK -KJN Document 114 Filed 03/17/10 Page 2 of 2