Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05048/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05048-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26

 27

 28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE 

Case No. C 08-5048 MMC 

GONZALEZ & LEIGH, LLP 

MATT GONZALEZ (SBN 153486) 

G. WHITNEY LEIGH (SBN 153457) 

MATT SPRINGMAN (SBN 252508) 

Two Shaw Alley, Third Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 512-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 512-2001 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ALPHONSO OLIPHANT, ROGER 

GAINEY and BRUCE WOODARD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ALPHONSO OLIPHANT, an individual, 

ROGER GAINEY, an individual, and 

BRUCE WOODARD, an individual, ROES 

1-25; 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, a public entity, SAN 

FRANCISCO JUVENILE PROBATION 

DEPARTMENT, a public entity, WILLIAM 

SIFFERMAN, an individual, DOES 1-25; 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 08-5048 MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION 

FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING

ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

 

Case 3:08-cv-05048-MMC Document 47 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 2
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE 

Case No. C 08-5048 MMC 

2

 On February 2, 2010, Plaintiffs filed an ex parte motion pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-2 and 7-

10 to continue the hearing on Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment from February 26, 

2010 to April 2, 2010 (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”). 

 Having considered the papers filed in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion and the record in this 

case, and good cause having been found, the Court HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion and 

ORDERS the following: 

1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment is CONTINUED from 

February 26, 2010 to April 2, 2010. 

2. The deadline for Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion For Summary 

Judgment is set at March 5, 2010. 

3. The deadline for Defendants’ Reply is set at March 19, 2010. 

 

Dated: February __, 2010 By:_________________________ 

 The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

 United States District Court 

and there being no showing of prejudice to defendants,

^

4

Case 3:08-cv-05048-MMC Document 47 Filed 02/04/10 Page 2 of 2