Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-73/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants

Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC

Case No. 15-cv-00262-EMC

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 

FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

O’Connor, Docket No. 518

Yucesoy, Docket No. 206

Plaintiffs must file their supplemental Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) notice, sent 

on April 21, 2016, by 12:00 Noon, Wednesday, June 1, 2016. See Docket No. 611 at 16 n. 14.

The parties must also explain the current status of the December 2015 arbitration 

agreement, including:

(1) To how many drivers has the December 2015 arbitration agreement been 

disseminated in California, Massachusetts, and the United States as a whole?

(2) Which arbitration agreement has Uber been distributing since the Court’s Rule 

23(d) order of December, 2015 was issued, and how many drivers have received that arbitration 

agreement?

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 669 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

The parties’ response is also due by 12:00 Noon, Wednesday, June 1, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 669 Filed 05/31/16 Page 2 of 2