Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00092/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00092-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN LYNN RECHT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0092 FCD JFM PS

vs.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed January 27, 2006, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On February 27, 2006, plaintiff’s copy of

that order was returned as undeliverable. The order was re-served on plaintiff on February 28,

2006. Thirty days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended

complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

Case 2:06-cv-00092-FCD-JFM Document 9 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 6, 2006. 

001; recht.fta

Case 2:06-cv-00092-FCD-JFM Document 9 Filed 04/07/06 Page 2 of 2