Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02761/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02761-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHERYL BUTLER-ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-02761-JST 

ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE

In response to the parties’ letter at ECF No. 46, the Court hereby amends the case 

deadlines as follows:

Event Deadline

Fact discovery cut-off 9/5/15

Expert disclosures 9/26/15

Expert rebuttal 10/17/15

Expert discovery cut-off 10/31/15

Deadline to file dispositive motions 11/21/15

Pretrial conference statement due 12/3/15

Pretrial conference 3/18/16 at 2:00 p.m.

Trial 4/11/16 at 8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) Seven

Case 3:14-cv-02761-JST Document 48 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 18, 2015. 

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-02761-JST Document 48 Filed 03/19/15 Page 2 of 2