Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01871/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01871-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LELAND LENNEAR AND NARVELL 

HENRY, SR.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DIAMOND PET FOOD PROCESSORS 

OF CALIFORNIA, LLC; DIAMOND PET 

FOOD PROCESSORS OF RIPON, LLC; 

SCHELL & KAMPETER, INC. d/b/a/ 

DIAMOND PET FOODS,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-1871 TLN CKD (TEMP)

ORDER

On April 26, 2016, the parties filed a joint statement of discovery disagreement. (Dkt. No. 

81.) That same day defendants filed a motion to file documents under seal in connection with the 

discovery disagreement. (Dkt. No. 82.) Local Rule 302(c)(1) provides that all discovery motions 

are among the duties to be performed by the assigned Magistrate Judge in civil matters. 

However, on March 31, 2016, the assigned District Judge issued an order in which he 

stated that the discovery deadline in this action “expired in December 2014.” (Dkt. No. 80 at 2.) 

In this regard, the time permitted for the undersigned to hear the parties’ discovery dispute has 

passed. 

/////

Case 2:13-cv-01871-TLN-CKD Document 83 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ discovery disagreement (Dkt. 

No. 81) and defendants’ motion to file documents under seal (Dkt. No. 82) are denied without 

prejudice to renewal.

Dated: April 28, 2016

lennear1871.disc.den.nt.docx

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:13-cv-01871-TLN-CKD Document 83 Filed 04/29/16 Page 2 of 2