Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00278/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00278-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Larry Eugene Varvel, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles L. Ryan; Attorney General of the

State of Arizona, 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-11-0278-PHX-FJM

ORDER

The court has before it petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 6), respondents’ response (doc. 13), and the Report and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. 14). No objections to the

Report and Recommendation were filed and the time for doing so has expired. 

The Magistrate Judge concluded that petitioner failed to properly exhaust his claims

in state court, the claims were procedurally defaulted, and no showing of a miscarriage of

justice or cause and actual prejudice were presented. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge

recommended denying the petition with prejudice. 

Pursuant to Rule 8(b), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, we accept the recommended

decision of the United States Magistrate Judge. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED DENYING

the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 6). 

Case 2:11-cv-00278-FJM Document 17 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Because dismissal of the petition is justified by a procedural bar and jurists of reason

would not find the ruling debatable, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING a certificate

of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

DATED this 18th day of November, 2011.

Case 2:11-cv-00278-FJM Document 17 Filed 11/18/11 Page 2 of 2