Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01679/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01679-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO

DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

4:14-CV-01679 CW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Samuel P. Myler (Pro Hac Vice) SMyler@mayerbrown.com

71 South Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60606

Telephone: 312.782.0600

Dominique-Chantale Alepin (SBN 241648)

dalepin@mayerbrown.com

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300

3000 El Camino Real

Palo Alto, California 94306-2112

Telephone: (650) 331-2000

Attorneys for Defendants

LAURENCE F. PADWAY (SBN 89314)

Email: lpadway@padway.com

1516 Oak Street, Suite 109

Alameda, California 94501

Telephone: (510) 814 6100

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Marie E. Horn,

Plaintiff,

v.

Northrop Grumman Corporation and

Northrop Grumman Benefit Plan

Administrative Committee,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:14-cv-01679-CW

STIPULATION TO EXTEND

DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN

SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 4:14-cv-01679-CW Document 57 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO

DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

4:14-CV-01679 CW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On April 10, 2015, Plaintiff Marie E. Horn filed her Second Amended

Complaint for Misrepresentation. On May 18, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to

dismiss the Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff filed her response brief to Defendants’ motion to

dismiss on June 2, 2015. Pursuant to the Court’s March 27, 2015 order granting

Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, Defendants’

reply is due on or before June 8, 2015. However, counsel for Defendants is

currently out of the office and not returning to work until that same date.

Accordingly, a short extension of time is necessary to afford Defendants sufficient

time to prepare and file their reply brief.

Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate to extend Defendants’ time to file a

reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended

Complaint for Misrepresentation by seven (7) days. Defendants shall file and

serve their reply on or before June 15, 2015.

Case 4:14-cv-01679-CW Document 57 Filed 06/08/15 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO

DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

4:14-CV-01679 CW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED:

Dated: June 5, 2015 By: /s/ Samuel P. Myler

Attorney for Defendants

Dated: June 5, 2015 By: /s/ Laurence F. Padway

Attorney for Plaintiff

SO ORDERED:

Dated: _______________ _________________________

Hon. Judge Claudia Wilken

United States District Judge

06/08/2015

Case 4:14-cv-01679-CW Document 57 Filed 06/08/15 Page 3 of 3