Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01940/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01940-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mbomani Mia,

Petitioner, 

vs.

Katrina Kane, et al., 

 Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 09-1940-PHX-MHM

ORDER

Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241

on September 18, 2009. On November 16, 2009, Respondents filed their response to

Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner filed a reply on December 4,

2009. On September 29, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and Recommendation

recommending that the petition be denied. 

In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Failure to timely file objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge

/ / / 

Case 2:09-cv-01940-MHM Document 38 Filed 12/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

may be considered a waiver of a party’s right to de novo consideration of the issues. See

United States v. Reyna-Tapia 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

After a complete and independent review of the issues presented, the Court finds itself

in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court (Doc. 37). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied

(Doc. 1). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 28th day of December, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-01940-MHM Document 38 Filed 12/29/10 Page 2 of 2