Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-01147/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-01147-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

cal 

1 06CV1147

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RPA INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD., d/b/a

NUFURN PTY LTD.; NUFURN, INC. and

DENNIS MICHAEL KRAWCHUK, an

individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPACT INTERNATIONAL, INC.; LEE

JOHNSON, an individual; PRE SALES, INC;

ERIC SEGAL, an individual; BZ GLOBAL

SDN. BHD.; BZ GLOBAL (H.K.) LIMITED;

CHEE CHOON CHEAH, an individual; and

KOK CHEONG SOO, an individual,

Defendants. 

KOK CHEONG SOO, an individual; and

CHEE CHOON CHEAH, an individual,

Counter-Plaintiffs,

v.

DENNIS MICHAEL DRAWCHUK, an

individual,

Counter-Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

))

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No.06cv1147 WQH(AJB)

Order Following Telephonic 

Discovery Conference

A telephonic discovery conference was held on September 26, 2007. Philip Petti and Amanda

Lowery appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff and Kok Cheong Soo, an individual defendant, appeared pro

se. Two issue were raised by the parties during the conference. First, Plaintiff sought supplementation

of Defendant Soo’s written responses to interrogatories and requests for production of documents, as

well as production of documents responsive to their requests for production. Defendant Soo agreed to:

Case 3:06-cv-01147-WQH-AJB Document 92 Filed 09/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K:\COMMON\BATTAGLI\CASES\2 Orders to be filed\06cv1147.RPA.v.Compact.order.fol.disc-t.wpd 2 06CV1147

1) to supplement and fully respond to interrogatory no. 9 on or before October 3, 2007; and 2) to

supplement his written responses to fully respond to Plaintiff’s interrogatories and requests for

production of documents, as well as produce all documents in his possession, custody or control that are

responsive to Plaintiff’s requests on or before October 10, 2007.

With regard to the second issue raised by the parties, the Court set a briefing schedule for

Defendant Soo’s motion to compel production of confidential and/or privileged documents designated

‘attorney’s eyes only’ produce by the parties pursuant to the protective order in this case. Defendant

Soo shall file his motion to compel on or before October 3, 2007 and Plaintiff shall file their response

on or before October 17, 2007. The Court sets a telephonic discovery conference for October 23, 2007

at 5:00 p.m. to discuss resolution of the motion. Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 28, 2007

Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia

U.S. Magistrate Judge

United States District Court

Case 3:06-cv-01147-WQH-AJB Document 92 Filed 09/28/07 Page 2 of 2