Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00983/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00983-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GALINA ARLOV,

Plaintiff,

v.

LAKE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-00983-JD 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

The Court dismissed without prejudice plaintiff Galina Arlov’s complaint and terminated 

her motion for a temporary restraining order for failure to state a plausible claim under Rule 8. 

Dkt. No. 11. She was given until May 1, 2019, to file an amended complaint and advised that 

failure to adhere to this deadline would result in dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(b). Id. The deadline has passed, and no amended complaint has been filed.

The Court has considered the five factors set forth in Malone v. United States Postal 

Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). The Court finds that notwithstanding the public policy 

favoring the disposition of actions on their merits, the Court’s need to manage its docket and the 

public interest in the expeditious resolution of the litigation require dismissal of this action. There 

is no appropriate less drastic sanction in light of plaintiff’s failure to amend her complaint in a 

timely manner. This action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 9, 2019

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:19-cv-00983-JD Document 12 Filed 05/09/19 Page 1 of 1