Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00660/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00660-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC AND DEADLINE TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00660-RS 

sf-3650278

MICHAEL J. AGOGLIA (CA SBN 154810)

MAgoglia@mofo.com 

GRANT C. SCHRADER (CA SBN 273498) 

GSchrader@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and 

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PETER MAZONAS and MARCIA MAZONAS, 

individually and On Behalf of All Others 

Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC.; BANK OF 

AMERICA, N.A.,; BANK OF AMERICA 

CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 200, inclusive, 

Defendants.

Case No. 3:16-cv-00660-RS

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 

CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE AND DEADLINE 

TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Judge: Honorable Richard Seeborg 

Case 3:16-cv-00660-RS Document 34 Filed 05/05/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC AND DEADLINE TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00660-RS 1

sf-3650278

WHEREAS, on March 25, 2016, defendants Nationstar Mortgage LLC (“Nationstar”), 

and Bank of America, N.A. and Bank of America Corporation (collectively, “Bank of America”) 

filed motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ Complaint; 

WHEREAS, those motions were set for hearing on May 12, 2016, along with an initial 

case management conference that same day; 

WHEREAS, on May 4, 2016, the Court issued an order granting defendants’ motions to 

dismiss plaintiffs’ California Consumers Legal Remedies Act claim with prejudice, but denying 

the motions with respect to plaintiffs’ Truth-in-Lending Act, Unfair Competition Law, and breach 

of contract claims based on plaintiffs’ allegation that they made the full mortgage payment due 

for November 1, 2013, but defendants failed to treat it as such (Dkt No. 32);

WHEREAS, the parties believe that settling disputed facts through informal discussions 

will help either move the case toward resolution or clarify the issues in the action going forward, 

and that there is a reasonable likelihood that the parties could, through good faith efforts, come to 

a common understanding of the facts; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to engage in such good faith efforts, including toward 

potentially resolving this case; 

WHEREAS, a short continuance of the case management conference and deadline to 

answer the Complaint will facilitate the parties’ focus on resolving the case, thereby potentially 

conserving the parties’ and the Court’s resources; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, 

that:

x The parties shall have until June 9, 2016, to meet and confer regarding the claims 

in this case. If there is no resolution, by June 9, 2016, defendants will file their 

answers to the Complaint and the parties will submit an updated case management 

conference statement with concrete proposals for the case schedule and plan. 

x The parties request that the initial case management conference scheduled for May 

12, 2016, be continued to Thursday, June 16, 2016, at 10 a.m., or such later time as 

determined by the Court. 

Case 3:16-cv-00660-RS Document 34 Filed 05/05/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC AND DEADLINE TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00660-RS 2

sf-3650278

x The parties will exchange initial disclosures by May 17, 2016. 

x Should the court not be inclined to grant the continuance, the parties will file a 

joint initial case management conference statement as soon as practicable. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: May 5, 2016 MORRISON FOERSTER LLP 

By: /s/ Michael J. Agoglia 

 Michael J. Agoglia 

Attorneys for Defendants BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 

and BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 

DATED: May 5, 2016 SEVERSON & WERSON 

A Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Erik Kemp

 Erik Kemp 

Attorneys for Defendant NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE 

LLC

DATED: May 5, 2016 THE ARNS LAW FIRM 

By: /s/ Robert S. Arns 

 Robert S. Arns 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs PETER MAZONAS and 

MARCIA MAZONAS

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May ___, 2016 _____________________________ 

 Hon. Richard Seeborg 

 United States District Judge 

5

Case 3:16-cv-00660-RS Document 34 Filed 05/05/16 Page 3 of 3