Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02011/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02011-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE RUBBER CHEMICALS ANTITRUST

LITIGATION,

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES

TO ALL ACTIONS

 /

MDL Docket No. C-04-1648 MMC

C-03-1496 MMC

C-03-1516 MMC

C-03-2477 MMC

C-03-2805 MMC

C-03-3147 MMC

C-03-3418 MMC

C-04-0197 MMC

C-05-0159 MMC

C-05-0211 MMC

C-05-2011 MMC

C-05-2224 MMC

C-06-5700 MMC

C-07-1057 MMC

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

CONFERENCE; DIRECTIONS TO

PARTIES

Before the Court is a stipulation, signed by counsel for the parties in two of the

above-referenced thirteen individual actions, specifically, Case No. 6-5700 and Case No. 7-

1057, by which stipulation counsel request the status conference be continued from May 9,

2008 to May 23, 2008. The stipulating parties also indicate they believe none of the other

eleven actions is “active.”

Good cause appearing, the status conference is hereby CONTINUED to May 23,

2008. A Joint Status Conference Statement shall be filed no later than May 16, 2008.

Case 3:05-cv-02011-MMC Document 11 Filed 04/25/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If the parties to any case other than Case No. 6-5700 or Case No. 7-1057 are of the

view that their action, or any part thereof, remains active, such parties are obligated to

participate in the preparation of the Joint Status Conference Statement and to attend the

May 23, 2008 Status Conference.

If the parties to any case other than Case No. 6-5700 or Case No. 7-1057 are of the

view that their action has been entirely resolved, such parties are not obligated to

participate and attend as set forth above, provided they either: (1) file, no later than May

16, 2008, a separate statement in which they identify the orders and/or docket entries that

have resolved the case; or (2) file, no later than May 16, 2008, a dismissal or other

document that indicates all pleaded claims have been resolved and that closure of the case

is appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 25, 2008 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-02011-MMC Document 11 Filed 04/25/08 Page 2 of 2