Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00344/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00344-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOEL MEJIA PLASENCIA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

MRS. STUMP, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00344-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND

DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

(Docs. 18 and 19)

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL COUNTS AS

A STRIKE UNDER 28 U.S.C. §

1915(G)

Plaintiff Joel Mejia Plasencia (“plaintiff”) is a federal

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 25, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. On October

Case 1:05-cv-00344-OWW -SMS Document 21 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

10, 2006, plaintiff filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of

this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the

record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 25, 2006,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This action is dismissed in its entirety as follows:

a. Plaintiff’s claims stemming from the disciplinary

charge, hearing, and conviction for threatening

staff, which resulted in the loss of time credits,

are DISMISSED, without prejudice; and,

b. Plaintiff’s claim(s) against defendant Stump for

continuously searching cells and confiscating

items, claim(s) against defendant Ayers for calling

him names and ordering him placed in administrative

segregation, and claim against defendant Pysher for

keeping his property from him are DISMISSED, with

prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted; and

///

///

///

///

///

Case 1:05-cv-00344-OWW -SMS Document 21 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

3. This dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. §

1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 15, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00344-OWW -SMS Document 21 Filed 11/16/06 Page 3 of 3