Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05923/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05923-45/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VERONICA GUTIERREZ, ERIN

WALKER, and WILLIAM SMITH, as

individuals and on behalf of all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and 

DOES 1 through 125,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-05923 WHA

CLASS ACTION

ORDER REGARDING

SEQUENCING ORDER #1

With respect to “Sequencing Order #1” used in plaintiffs’ revised damages study,

plaintiffs shall bring to Wednesday’s hearing whatever evidence (if any) they have to prove that it

accurately represents the transaction posting algorithm used by Wells Fargo prior to when the

accused “high-to-low” re-sequencing practice began.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-05923-WHA Document 327 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 1