Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04210/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04210-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

__________________________________________________ 

Order of the Court on Petition for Court Approval 

Of Petition for Minor’s Compromise of Claims 

Singh v. Alameda et al 

U.S. Dist. Ct. – San Francisco 

Case No. CV-05-04210-MHP 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB# 159747 

DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ., CSB# 236458 

THE LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL 

925 West Hedding Street 

San Jose, California 95126 

T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0203 

rrplaw@sbcglobal.net 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

JUDY & SUKHENDRA SINGH 

Individually and as G.A.L. For 

Eddie Singh (minor) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(San Francisco Division) 

SUKHENDRA SINGH, et al., ) Case No. CV-05-04210-MHP 

) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

) ORDER APPROVING PETITION 

vs. ) FOR MINOR’S COMPROMISE OF 

) CLAIMS 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

____________________________________) 

Plaintiffs herein, by and through their counsel, submitted a Petition for Court Approval of 

Minor’s Compromise of Claims on June____, 2006, pertaining to a settlement that all plaintiffs 

had reached with the County of Alameda and the individually named employee-defendants of the 

County of Alameda. The court also received a Statement of Non-Opposition from counsel for 

defendants, Ms. Sandy Narayan. 

Upon review of the file and consideration of the Petition, the Declaration of plaintiffs’ 

counsel and supporting documentation submitted therewith, and the opposition and/or non22

Case 3:05-cv-04210-MHP Document 28 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 2
__________________________________________________ 

Order of the Court on Petition for Court Approval 

Of Petition for Minor’s Compromise of Claims 

Singh v. Alameda et al 

U.S. Dist. Ct. – San Francisco 

Case No. CV-05-04210-MHP 

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

opposition of any other defendant provided to the court prior to the making of this order, the 

court does hereby find and order as follows: 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, 

1. The minor’s claims against the defendant County of Alameda, and the individually named 

employee-defendants thereof, as compromised pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement 

and Mutual General Release, and the Qualified Assignment and Release of Periodic Payment 

Obligation, (referred to collectively herein as the “settlement documents”), attached hereto and 

incorporated by this reference, is approved. Plaintiffs’ counsel may attach the fully executed 

settlement documents, when obtained, to this Order for purposes of submitting same to Allstate 

Life Insurance Company. 

2. The court approves of the dismissal of all claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall 

submit such dismissal promptly after the annuity/annuities set forth in the settlement documents 

have been funded. 

3. The court approves the distribution of attorney fees to plaintiffs’ counsel, and the 

reimbursement of costs, as set forth in the Petition. 

IT IS SO ORDERED

Date: June ____, 2006 ____________________________________ 

 JUDGE MARILYN H. PATEL 

U.S. District Court Judge 

27

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:05-cv-04210-MHP Document 28 Filed 06/28/06 Page 2 of 2