Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01742/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01742-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert Litten, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 05-1742-PHX-EHC (LOA)

ORDER

On June 8, 2005, Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983,

alleging claims based on overcrowding, unsanitary conditions, denial of outside recreat ion,

and failure to protect from other inmates who use t heir canes, crutches, walkers, and

prost het ics as weapons. [Dkt. 1]. On October 12, 2005, the Court ordered service on

Defendant Arpaio. [Dkt. 4]. The October 12, 2005 Order was returned to the Clerk of Court

as undeliverable to Plaintiff. The returned mail indicated that Plaintiff had been released.

On November 15, 2005, Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson ordered Plaintiff

to show cause, by December 5, 2005, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to

provide t he Court with a Notice of Address Change. [Dkt. 6]. The December 5, 2005 Order

was returned to the Clerk of Court as undeliverable. Plaintiff has not responded to the

Order to Show Cause.

On December 16, 2005, Magistrate Judge Anderson issued a Report and

Recommendation, recommending the dismissal of this case. [Dkt. 8]. Plaintiff's cop y of the

Case 2:05-cv-01742-EHC Document 11 Filed 01/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Report and Recommendat ion was returned to the Clerk of Court as undeliverable. Plaintiff

has not filed a Response or Objection to the Report and Recommendation.

A district court judge reviews de novo the Report and Recommendation of a

Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

The Court having reviewed the record de novo, adopts in full the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates the same as a part of this

Order.

Accordingly,

IT IS O RDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is

adopted in full. [Dkt. 17].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint [Dkt. 1] is DISMISSED

without prejudice.

DATED this 10th day of January, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-01742-EHC Document 11 Filed 01/10/06 Page 2 of 2