Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02961/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02961-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Hearing Date and Setting Briefing Schedule for Coles Plaintiffs’ Motion For Attorneys Fees / Case 

No. C-03-2961 TEH (JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

Randolph W. Hall, State Bar No. 080142 

Chief Asst. City Attorney 

Office of the City Attorney 

One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor 

Oakland CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 238-3601 

Facsimile: (510) 238-6500 

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND 

and POLICE CHIEF RICHARD WORD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SRI LOUISE COLES, et al. 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs.

CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal entity, et al. 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

File No. C -03-2961 TEH (JL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND 

CONTINUING HEARING DATE FOR 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS RE: 

OPD’S CROWD CONTROL POLICY

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD: 

The parties, plaintiffs in the Sri Louise Coles action, No. C -03-2961 TEH (JL) and defendant 

City of Oakland, acting by and through their respective legal counsel, stipulate to the following with 

Case 3:03-cv-02961-TEH Document 94 Filed 07/13/05 Page 1 of 3
2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Hearing Date and Setting Briefing Schedule for Coles Plaintiffs’ Motion For Attorneys Fees / Case 

No. C-03-2961 TEH (JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

regard to plaintiffs’ Motion For Attorneys’ Fees and Costs related to work on the OPD crowd control 

policy, (hereinafter, motion): 

 1) The remainder of the briefing schedule and the motion hearing date will be adjusted to 

coincide with those dates for the similar motion in the related Local 10 case. 

 2) Plaintiffs in the Coles action will file their reply brief by August 29, 2005. 

 3) The parties stipulate that the hearing on the Coles motion, currently set for August 15, 

2005, be continued to September 19, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. 

So Stipulated: 

Dated: July 11, 2005 HADDAD & SHERWIN 

 By:______/s/___________________ 

 Michael Haddad 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 SRI LOUISE COLES, et al. 

Dated: July 12, 2005 BERTRAND, FOX, & ELLIOT 

 By:_______/s/_____________________ 

 Gregory M. Fox 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 CITY OF OAKLAND, et al. 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled document. 

 By:_______/s/_____________________ 

 Gregory M. Fox 

Case 3:03-cv-02961-TEH Document 94 Filed 07/13/05 Page 2 of 3
3

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Hearing Date and Setting Briefing Schedule for Coles Plaintiffs’ Motion For Attorneys Fees / Case 

No. C-03-2961 TEH (JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 Good cause appearing, the stipulation is so ordered. Plaintiffs in the Coles action to file their 

reply brief by August 29, 2005. The hearing on the Coles motion, currently set for August 15, 2005, 

is continued to September 19, 2005 at 10:00 a.m.. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________________ 

 The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:03-cv-02961-TEH Document 94 Filed 07/13/05 Page 3 of 3