Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-md-01913/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-md-01913-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 08-md-1913, Amended Stipulation Pursuant To Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2 Extending Time To Respond To 

Complaint And Court-Ordered Deadlines and [Proposed] Order 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANDREW BARTON, TRACEY 

WADMORE SMITH, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF 

OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

AIR NEW ZEALAND, ALL NIPPON 

AIRWAYS, CATHAY PACIFIC 

AIRWAYS, CHINA AIRLINES, EVA 

AIRWAYS, JAPAN AIRLINES 

INTERNATIONAL, MALAYSIA 

AIRLINES, NORTHWEST 

AIRLINES, QANTAS AIRWAYS, 

SINGAPORE AIRLINES, THAI 

AIRWAYS, 

 Defendants.

 Case No. 08-md-01913 CRB 

Transferred from: CD CA 07-cv-7392 

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT 

TO LOCAL RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT AND 

CONTINUING COURT-ORDERED 

DEADLINES 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT 

Defendant’s time to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint shall 

be extended until forty-five days after the filing of a Consolidated Amended 

Complaint in the Transpacific Air Passenger cases, or such other times as the parties 

may jointly agree to in writing. 

Dated: [ ] [ ], 2008 

_______________________________

Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

Judge of the United States District Court 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

April 4

Case 3:08-md-01913-CRB Document 30 Filed 04/07/08 Page 1 of 1