Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00405/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00405-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE T. MOTEN,

Plaintiff, 2:06-cv-0405-GEB-KJM-P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed a document in which he objects to the magistrate judge’s June 6,

2006 denial of plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel. The court construes plaintiff’s

objection as a motion for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate

judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the

entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00405-GEB -KJM Document 16 Filed 09/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed June 6, 2006 , is affirmed. 

Dated: September 13, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00405-GEB -KJM Document 16 Filed 09/14/06 Page 2 of 2