Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01974/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01974-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1974 MCE DAD P

vs.

JAMES YATES, et al., ORDER AND

Respondents. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On August 31, 2006, an order was served on the petitioner at his address of

record. On September 12, 2006, petitioner’s copy of the order was returned by the U.S. Postal

Service as undeliverable. The envelope was marked “RTS - Not at PVSR Coalinga (Deceased).”

On October 11, 2006, court staff were advised by the California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation that petitioner Abdullah Muhammad, CDCR # T-69523, died on December 31,

2005.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this

order and findings and recommendations, together with a copy of the petition filed in this case on

September 29, 2005, upon the Attorney General of the State of California; and 

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed due to the death of

petitioner.

Case 2:05-cv-01974-MCE -DAD Document 14 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file

written objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections

to Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may

waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 12, 2006.

DAD:13

muha1974.f&r

Case 2:05-cv-01974-MCE -DAD Document 14 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 2