Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05983/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05983-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 13-cv-05983 NC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEXANDRA HERNANDEZ,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

MIDPEN HOUSING CORP.,

 Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-05983 NC

ORDER STRIKING EMAIL TO 

PROPOSED ORDER BOX

This morning the Court received an email in the proposed order inbox that, upon 

review, was an improvident “reply all” email that was intended for co-counsel, not the 

Court. This provides an opportunity to remind counsel of the powerful functionality of 

“reply all” and of the proverb “measure twice, cut once.” If one has an inclination to draft a 

“reply all” email, especially a snarky email, it is particularly important to check the address 

field before pressing send.

The Court strikes the email and trusts that this mistake will not recur. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: July 31, 2015

_________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-05983-NC Document 63 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 1