Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00935/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00935-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON BARKE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0935 RRB PAN P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, Warden, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed April 28, 2006, plaintiff’s claims were severed from those of four

other plaintiffs, the instant action was opened, and plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an

amended complaint and a new application to proceed in forma pauperis. The thirty-day period

has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or an in forma pauperis

application, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:06-cv-00935-RRB-PAN Document 3 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 12, 2006.

14

bark0935.fta

Case 2:06-cv-00935-RRB-PAN Document 3 Filed 06/13/06 Page 2 of 2