Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00614/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00614-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCO JARA,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-00614 DFL GGH P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTION, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

On January 27, 2006, respondent announced a change to its rules permitting

inmates to wear their hair in any manner provided that it does “not extend over the eyebrows,

cover the inmate’s face or pose a health and safety risk.” Amended CAL. CODE REGS. tit.xv, §

3062(e). On July 27, 2006, the emergency regulations became permanent.

In their response to petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus, respondents stated that they

intended to withdraw petitioner’s Rules Violation Reports (RVR) from his record upon adoption

of the final regulation. (Def.’s Answer 3.) As a result, respondent stated that petitioner would

not suffer any punitive consequences from having received any RVR. Id. Consequently,

respondents contend that their action will render this case moot.

Respondents in the above-captioned case shall respond within 30 days of this

order as to whether such action has been taken and all penalties imposed upon petitioner as a

Case 2:05-cv-00614-RRB-GGH Document 34 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Plaintiff stated that the RVR changed his release date from March 3, 2006, to June 17, 1

2006. (Pl.’s Req. Judicial Notice 2). On March 24, 2006, plaintiff notified the court of a change

of address. Plaintiff currently resides in Patterson, California, rather than at his address at the

time he filed his writ, Mule Creek State Prison, Ione, California.

2

result have been restored. In the event that petitioner’s RVR have been removed from his record,

petitioner shall respond within 30 days of respondent’s filing of a response to this order whether

he believes this action moots this case.1

DATED: 8/15/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

______________________________

U.S. Magistrate Judge

ggh13/habeas

Jara.0614.moot.ord.wpd

Case 2:05-cv-00614-RRB-GGH Document 34 Filed 08/15/06 Page 2 of 2