Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00821/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00821-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROCKY RENO MEVES, Case No. 1:07-cv-0821-LJO-NEW (TAG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO ADOPT FINDINGS AND 

v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

THE CALIFORNIA RAND SILVER (Doc. 8)

MINING CO., et al.,

Defendants.

 ___________________________________/

On June 5, 2007, Plaintiff RockyReno Meves (“Meves”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se,

filed a civil rights and personal injury complaint in this Court. (Doc. 1). On June 14, 2007, the

Magistrate Judge issued an order dismissing Meves’ complaint without prejudice, but granted him

thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 4). On June 29, 2007, Meves timely filed his

amended complaint. (Doc. 6). 

On August 20, 2007, the Magistrate Judge screened Meves’ amended complaint, pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Upon finding that it contained myriad deficiencies, the Magistrate Judge

issued Findings and Recommendations, in which she recommended that Meves’ amended complaint

be dismissed without prejudice and the action be closed. (Doc. 8). Meves’ objections, certified as

mailed on September 4, 2007 and filed on September 13, merely reiterate, albeit more coherently,

the allegations he raised in his amended complaint. (Doc. 11). Meves’ objections, therefore, are

insufficient to rebut the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 72(b), and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case.

Case 1:07-cv-00821-LJO-LJO Document 13 Filed 09/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the Findings and

Recommendations filed on August 20, 2007, are supported by the record and by the Magistrate

Judge’s analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings andRecommendations (Doc. 8), filed August 20, 2007, are ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00821-LJO-LJO Document 13 Filed 09/18/07 Page 2 of 2