Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00400/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00400-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID DANIELS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-0400 MCE GGH P

vs.

W. YOUNT, et al., ORDER AND

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed July 31, 2007, this court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial statement

on or before September 7, 2007. Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order. The court will

therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f);

Local Rule 11-110.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement.

2. The pretrial conference set for September 28, 2007, and the jury trial set for

December 10, 2007, are vacated; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 11-110.

\\\\\

Case 2:03-cv-00400-MCE -GGH Document 116 Filed 10/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 10/1/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

dani0400.fpt

Case 2:03-cv-00400-MCE -GGH Document 116 Filed 10/01/07 Page 2 of 2