Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01624/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01624-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DIMAS O’CAMPO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RAGHBIR SINGH GHOMAN, dba 

QUICK SHOP 2; GHOMAN’S 

PROPERTIES, LLC, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:08-cv-1624 KJM AC PS (TEMP) 

ORDER 

 On February 6, 2012, plaintiff filed an amended complaint asserting one federal law claim 

and three state law claims. (ECF No. 27.) On July 26, 2013, the assigned District Judge found 

that plaintiff lacked standing to pursue plaintiff’s one federal claim. (ECF No. 60 at 3.) 

Accordingly, the assigned District Judge denied plaintiff’s previously filed motion for summary 

judgment, dismissed plaintiff’s first amended complaint with prejudice and closed this case. (Id. 

at 8.) 

On November 6, 2015, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order finding that 

although the “district court did not err in dismissing [plaintiff’s] complaint sua sponte . . . . the 

district court erred in dismissing the complaint with prejudice, as a dismissal for lack of 

jurisdiction is not an adjudication on the merits.” (ECF No. 67 at 4.) Accordingly, the Ninth 

Circuit vacated the dismissal of plaintiff’s amended complaint with prejudice and remanded this 

Case 2:08-cv-01624-KJM-DB Document 72 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

matter “for entry of an order dismissing the complaint without prejudice.” (Id.) The Ninth 

Circuit also stated that plaintiff “may request leave to file an amended complaint.” (Id.) On 

December 11, 2015 this matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to the appearance in 

propria persona of defendant Raghbir Ghoman. 

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 

 1. Plaintiff’s February 6, 2012 amended complaint (ECF no. 27) is dismissed 

without prejudice; 

 2. Plaintiff may file a motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint within 

28 days of the date of this order; and 

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve this order on the defendants by mail at their 

last known addresses. 

DATED: January 8, 2016 

Case 2:08-cv-01624-KJM-DB Document 72 Filed 01/11/16 Page 2 of 2