Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-01789/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-01789-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

06cv1789

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIANN KRECA, individually and as

Successor in Interest to THE ESTATE OF

MICHAEL E. KRECA. and MICHAEL

KRECA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ELMER EDWARDS, SAMANTHA

FLEMING, WILLIAM LANSDOWNE,

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, and DOES 1-100,

inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 06cv1789-L(AJB)

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING

DATE

On July 10, 2007 the parties filed a joint motion to continue hearing date on Defendants’

summary judgment motion, which is currently set for July 23, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. This is the

parties’ second request to continue hearing date on the same motion. It is again based on the

counsel’s need to address the press of other business. The court no longer accepts this as a

showing of good cause with respect to the same pending motion. The joint motion is granted

based on the parties’ representation regarding the unavailability of Plaintiff’s use-of-force

expert. In addition, the parties represented that they are working on “resolving at least some of

the issues raised in the motion prior to the date of the hearing.”

/ / / / /

/ / / / /

Case 3:06-cv-01789-L-AJB Document 25 Filed 07/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 06cv1789

For good cause having been shown, the parties’ joint motion is GRANTED, and it is

hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Consistent with the parties’ representation regarding their efforts to resolve some of

the issues on their own, no later than August 27, 2007, the parties shall jointly file a statement of

undisputed facts and resolved legal issues. The statement shall reference the portions of the

moving, opposition, and reply briefs which are no longer in dispute, and include an account of

the parties’ meeting and conferences leading to the resolution of the issues.

2. Plaintiff’s opposition papers shall be filed and served no later than August 13, 2007.

3. Defendants’ reply shall be filed no later than August 20, 2007.

4. The hearing on Defendants’ summary judgment motion is continued to September 4,

2007 at 10:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 11, 2007

M. James Lorenz

United States District Court Judge

COPY TO: 

HON. ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ALL PARTIES/COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-01789-L-AJB Document 25 Filed 07/11/07 Page 2 of 2