Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05336/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05336-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 196
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

-1- 

Stipulation To Dismiss Plaintiff Lee Roberts 

Case No. CV 09-5336-CRB 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERT ZARCO, ESQ. (Fla. State Bar No. 502138) 

ALEJANDRO BRITO, ESQ. (Fla. State Bar No. 0098442) 

HIMANSHU M. PATEL, ESQ. (Fla. State Bar No. 0167233) 

ZARCO EINHORN SALKOWSKI & BRITO, P.A. 

(Admitted pro hac vice) 

100 S.E. 2nd Street, Suite 2700 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 374-5418 

Facsimile: (305) 374-5428 

hpatel@zarcolaw.com 

ANGEL GOMEZ (State Bar No. 74476) 

ANDREW SOMMER (State Bar No. 192844) 

EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. 

One California Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-5427 

Telephone: 415.399.6036 

Facsimile: 415.398.0955 

asommer@ebglaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DEBORAH NORK, LEE ROBERTS and 

BAKER’S BOUQUET 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DEBORAH NORK, LEE ROBERTS and 

BAKER’S BOUQUET, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

DESIGNED COOKIES, INC., 

 Defendants. 

No. CV 09-5336 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE, WITH RESPECT TO 

PLAINTIFF LEE ROBERTS 

Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

Case 3:09-cv-05336-CRB Document 66 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 3
 -2- 

Stipulation To Dismiss Plaintiff Lee Roberts 

Case No. CV 09-5336-CRB 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Plaintiffs, Deborah Nork, Lee Roberts, 

and Baker’s Bouquet (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Designed Cookies, Inc. (“DCI”), by and 

through their respective counsel, hereby agree to the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff Lee 

Roberts and all of Lee Roberts’ claims against DCI. Plaintiff Lee Roberts shall not seek to 

recover from DCI the attorneys’ fees and costs Mr. Roberts incurred in this matter. DCI shall 

not seek to recover from Mr. Roberts the attorneys fees and costs DCI incurred in this matter. 

DCI shall not seek to recover from Deborah Nork or Baker’s Bouquet the attorneys’ fees or 

costs DCI incurred solely as a result of defending against Mr. Roberts' claim. 

Dated: March 31, 2010 ZARCO EINHORN SALKOWSKI & BRITO, P.A. 

HIMANSHU M. PATEL, ESQ. 

By:________/s/ Himanshu M.Patel__________________ 

Himanshu M. Patel 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DEBORAH NORK, LEE ROBERTS AND BAKER’S 

BOUQUET 

Dated: March 31, 2010 SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP 

JOEL D. SIEGEL, ESQ. 

By:____________/s/ Joel D Siegel _________________ 

 Joel D. Siegel 

Attorneys for Defendants 

DESIGNED COOKIES, INC. 

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from its signatories and from my clients. 

By:________/s/ Himanshu M.Patel__________________

 Himanshu M. Patel 

Case 3:09-cv-05336-CRB Document 66 Filed 04/05/10 Page 2 of 3
 -3- 

Stipulation To Dismiss Plaintiff Lee Roberts 

Case No. CV 09-5336-CRB 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, it is hereby 

ordered that plaintiff Lee Roberts and all of Lee Roberts’ claims against Designed Cookies Inc. 

(“DCI”) are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Lee Roberts shall not seek to recover from DCI 

the attorneys’ fees and costs Mr. Roberts incurred in this matter. DCI shall not seek to recover 

from Mr. Roberts the attorneys fees and costs DCI incurred in this matter. DCI shall not seek to 

recover from Deborah Nork or Baker’s Bouquet the attorneys fees or costs DCI incurred solely 

as a result of defending against Mr. Roberts’ claim. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________ _______________________________________________ 

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

April 5, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-05336-CRB Document 66 Filed 04/05/10 Page 3 of 3