Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04519/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04519-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CASE 

SCHEDUL; ORDER THEREON

 CASE NO. C-03-4519 JCS 

ALBERT J. BRENEISEN 

PHILIP J. MCCABE (SBN 201092) 

JOHN W. BATEMAN 

MICHAEL M. SHEN 

SHEILA MORTAZAVI 

KENYON & KENYON 

River Park Towers 

333 West San Carlos, Suite 600 

San Jose, CA 95110 

Telephone: 408-975-7500 

Facsimile: 408-975-7501 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

FCI USA, INC., and FCI AMERICAS 

TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

WILLIAM ANTHONY (SBN 106908) 

ELIZABETH HOWARD 

ALEX CHACHKES 

DIANA RUTOWSKI

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: 650-614-7400 

Facsimile: 650-614-7401 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, CO., 

LTD. and FOXCONN ELECTRONICS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

FCI USA, INC., and FCI AMERICAS 

TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

Plaintiffs and

Counter Defendants, 

v.

FOXCONN ELECTRONICS, INC. and HON 

HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, CO., LTD., 

Defendants and

Counter Claimants. 

Case No. C-03-4519 JCS 

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING 

CASE SCHEDULE; ORDER 

THEREON

Trial Date: May 1, 2006 at 8:30 a.m. 

Case 3:03-cv-04519-JCS Document 190 Filed 09/20/2005 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:03-cv-04519-JCS Document 191 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CASE 

SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON

 CASE NO. C-03-4519 JCS 

2

The parties, through their respective attorneys of record, and subject to the approval of the 

Court, hereby jointly stipulate to modify the current case schedule with respect to the submission of 

expert rebuttal reports and the dates for fact and expert discovery as set forth in the table below. 

These extensions of time will allow the parties to complete some additional fact discovery required 

for preparing the expert rebuttal reports. The extensions of time sought by the parties will not affect 

the dates for dispositive motions, the hearing date on dispositive motions, or the trial date. 

Date Event 

October 28, 2005 Due Date for Rebuttal Expert Reports 

October 28, 2005 Close of Fact Discovery 

November 4, 2005 Expert Discovery Begins 

November 25, 2005 Close of Expert Discovery 

The case schedule was originally set by the Court on March 8, 2004. The schedule has 

previously been modified to: (1) continue the Markman hearing from November 3, 2004 to 

November 10, 2004; (2) continue the Markman hearing from November 10, 2004 to December 8, 

2004, and to extend claim construction dates by 30 days; (3) extend post claim construction 

discovery, motions, final pretrial conference, and jury trial dates by 60 days; (4) modify the 

schedule in light of mediation proceedings; (5) in light of the dismissal of several patents-in-suit, 

change the hearing date for dispositive motions, change the date of the pretrial conference, and set 

the date for trial; and (6) move expert fact discovery dates to better ensure efficient progression.

The current schedule is reflected in this Court’s Order dated August 12, 2005.

Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties have agreed upon the following changes: (1) 

rebuttal expert reports, currently due September 30, 2005, would be due October 28, 2005; (2) the 

close of fact discovery, currently scheduled for October 7, 2005, would move to October 28, 2005; 

(3) the opening of expert discovery, currently scheduled for October 3, 2005, would move to 

November 4, 2005; (4) the close of expert discovery, currently scheduled for October 21, 2005, 

would be moved to November 25, 2005. The dates for dispositive motions (October 14, 2005), 

Case 3:03-cv-04519-JCS Document 190 Filed 09/20/2005 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:03-cv-04519-JCS Document 191 Filed 09/20/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CASE 

SCHEDUL; ORDER THEREON

 CASE NO. C-03-4519 JCS 

3

oppositions to dispositive motions (November 4, 2005), replies to oppositions to dispositive 

motions (November 18, 2005), the hearing on dispositive motions (December 16, 2005), and trial 

(May 1, 2006) have not been changed.

Dated: September 20, 2005 ALBERT J. BRENEISEN 

PHILIP J. MCCABE (SBN 201092) 

JOHN W. BATEMAN 

MICHAEL M. SHEN 

SHEILA MORTAZAVI 

KENYON & KENYON 

 /s/ 

Michael Shen 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

FCI USA, INC. and 

FCI AMERICAS TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

Dated: September 20, 2005 WILLIAM ANTHONY (SBN 106908) 

ELIZABETH HOWARD 

ALEX CHACHKES 

DIANA RUTOWSKI

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

 /s/ 

Alex Chachkes 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY, CO., LTD. 

and FOXCONN ELECTRONICS, INC. 

 I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this joint document has been obtained from 

Alex Chachkes, counsel for Defendants. 

Dated: September 20, 2005 /s/ 

 Michael M. Shen 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 20, 2005 _____________

 JOSEPH C. SPERO 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-04519-JCS Document 190 Filed 09/20/2005 Page 3 of 3 Case 3:03-cv-04519-JCS Document 191 Filed 09/20/05 Page 3 of 3