Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02460/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02460-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT L CAZET, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

TOPPA EPPS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 10-02460 JSW

ORDER DISCHARGING TO

SHOW CAUSE

The Court has received the response to the order to show cause filed by Defendants

Toppa Epps and Cameron Ripley (“Defendants”). Although the summons and complaint may

not have been properly served, Defendants clearly had notice of Plaintiffs’ ex parte application

for a temporary restraining order and of the Court’s order requiring a written response. 

Although the Court does not condone Defendants’ delay, the Court shall address this matter on

the merits. Therefore the Court will provide Defendants until 5:00 p.m. on June 10, 2010, to

file an opposition to Plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order, with chambers

copies delivered directly chambers by no later than 9:00 a.m. on June 11, 2010. Any brief filed

after this time will not be considered by the Court. If Defendants do not file a written

opposition, containing all of their arguments opposing the issuance of a temporary restraining

order, the Court will vacate the hearing and issue Plaintiffs’ requested temporary injunction. If

Defendants file an opposition within this deadline, Plaintiffs may file a reply by no later than

9:00 a.m. on June 11, 2010, with chambers copies delivered directly chambers by no later than 

Case 3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document 19 Filed 06/10/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

10:00 a.m. on June 11, 2010. The Court will not impose monetary sanctions at this time. 

However, the parties are admonished that any further violations of this Court’s orders will be

sanctioned.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 10, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document 19 Filed 06/10/10 Page 2 of 2