Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02460/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02460-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT L CAZET, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

TOPPA EPPS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 10-02460 JSW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendants Toppa Epps, Cameron Ripley, and Edward Hayman (“Defendants”) were

ordered to file an opposition to Plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order by 9:00

a.m. today, June 10, 2010. Despite having notice of Plaintiffs’ application and of the Court’s

order, Defendants have failed to comply. Therefore, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Defendants

to show cause (“OSC”) in writing why Plaintiff’s application should not be granted as

unopposed and why Defendants’ counsel should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for

failing to comply with the Court’s order. Defendants shall file a response to this OSC by no

later than 2:00 p.m. on June 10, 2010. If Defendants do not file a response to this OSC and do

not file an opposition to Plaintiffs’ application, along with a request providing good cause to file 

///

///

///

///

Case 3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document 16 Filed 06/10/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

their opposition late, the Court will vacate the hearing and grant Plaintiffs’ application as

unopposed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 10, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document 16 Filed 06/10/10 Page 2 of 2