Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01137/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01137-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVON E. McCOY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

J. STRATTON et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:12-cv-1137 WBS DAD P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On November 21, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:12-cv-01137-WBS-DB Document 44 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 21, 2014, are adopted in full; 

 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on plaintiff’s failure to exhaust 

administrative remedies (Doc. No. 36) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: 

a. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s excessive use of force 

claims is denied; 

b. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s deliberate indifference 

medical care claims is granted; 

c. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s retaliation claims is 

denied; and 

 3. Within thirty days of the date of this order, defendants are directed to file an answer in 

this action. 

Dated: January 20, 2015 

/mcco1137.801 

Case 2:12-cv-01137-WBS-DB Document 44 Filed 01/21/15 Page 2 of 2