Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01877/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01877-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ALI, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:21-cv-1877 CKD P 

ORDER 

 On January 20, 2022, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s 

screening order filed January 10, 2022, finding that plaintiff failed to state a Fourteenth 

Amendment claim against defendant Ali. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate 

judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of 

the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly 

erroneous or contrary to law. 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the 

magistrate judge filed January 10, 2022, is affirmed. 

Dated: February 11, 2022 /s/ John A. Mendez 

 THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 2:21-cv-01877-DAD-CKD Document 14 Filed 02/14/22 Page 1 of 1