Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01610/USCOURTS-ca4-14-01610-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1610

KIM WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KETTLER MANAGEMENT INC.; AIMCO PROPERTIES, LP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. 

(8:12-cv-01226-CBD)

Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: May 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kim Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Lauri E. Cleary, Michael John 

Neary, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, CHARTERED, Bethesda, Maryland; 

Steven G. Metzger, Mark S. Saudek, GALLAGHER EVELIUS & JONES, 

LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1610 Doc: 43 Filed: 05/14/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Kim Williams appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting 

the summary judgment motions of Kettler Management, Inc. 

(“Kettler”) and AIMCO Properties, L.P. (“AIMCO”) on his claims 

under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 

§ 2000e et seq. (2012), Md. Code. Ann., State Gov’t § 20-601 et

seq. (West 2015), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012), and Kettler’s 

counterclaim for breach of contract. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Williams v. Kettler 

Mgmt. Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01226-CBD (D. Md. June 11, 2014). 

We deny Williams’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before us and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-1610 Doc: 43 Filed: 05/14/2015 Pg: 2 of 2