Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01483/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01483-42/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Currently pending and set for hearing on January 27, 2020, are Plaintiffs’ motions to 

disqualify defense counsel Robert Rogoyski and dismiss guardian ad litem Timothy Bragg. See

Doc. Nos. 203, 204, 208. Currently pending and set for hearing on February 10, 2020, is 

Defendant’s Rule 12(h)(3) motion to dismiss. See Doc. No. 209. 

On January 8, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation to hear the three pending motions 

together. See Doc. No. 210. The parties request a unified hearing date of either February 10 or 

February 24, 2020. See id. After consideration, the Court will give effect to the stipulation and

set a unified hearing date of February 24, 2020. 

Additionally, on November 20, 2019, the Court set a briefing schedule for oppositions and 

replies regarding Plaintiffs’ motions. See Doc. No. 208. Plaintiffs’ motions have been pending 

since November 17, 2019, so there has been plenty of time to prepare an opposition. However,

given the seriousness of Plaintiffs’ motions, and in light of the new hearing date, the Court will 

slightly alter the deadlines for the parties to file their respective oppositions and replies. 

ESTATE OF CECIL ELKINS, JR., et al.,

Plaintiffs

v.

HIPOLITO PELAYO,

Defendant

CASE NO. 1:13-CV-1483 AWI SAB 

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION 

TO CONTINUE HEARING DATES

(Doc. No. 210)

Case 1:13-cv-01483-AWI-SAB Document 211 Filed 01/09/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The January 27, 2020, hearing date on Plaintiffs’ motion to disqualify (Doc. No. 203) and 

motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 204) is VACATED;

2. The February 10, 2020, hearing date on Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 209) is 

VACATED;

3. Hearing on the three pending motions (Doc. Nos. 203, 204, and 209) is RESET to 

February 24, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom No. 2;

4. Oppositions to Plaintiffs’ motions shall be filed on or before 3:00 p.m. on January 21, 

2020;

5. Replies to Defendant’s oppositions to Plaintiffs’ pending motions shall be filed on or 

before 3:00 p.m. on January 30, 2020; and

6. The briefing schedule for Defendant’s motion shall remain in accordance with Local Rules

230(c) and 230(d).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 9, 2020 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01483-AWI-SAB Document 211 Filed 01/09/20 Page 2 of 2