Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04220/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04220-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

**E-filed 05/10/2010** 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

COMMITTEE FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS 

OF SONOMA COUNTY, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 08-4220 RS 

ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER 

BRIEFING 

On May 7, 2010, the individual federal defendants filed a notice of interlocutory appeal as to 

the March 10, 2010 Order granting in part and denying in part the motions to dismiss the Second 

Amended Complaint. It appears that the federal defendants believe that their deadline to appeal 

was not affected by the pendency of their motion to reconsider, which was under submission. But 

see, Mitchell v. Maurer, 67 F.2d 286 (9th Cir. 1933). 

No later than May 17, 2010, the parties shall submit supplemental briefs setting forth their 

views as to the impact of the notice of appeal, if any, on this Court’s jurisdiction to decide the 

motion for reconsideration either as to the federal defendants, the county defendants, or both. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 05/10/2010 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:08-cv-04220-RS Document 188 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 1