Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00010/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00010-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENISHO QUINCY HOWSE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0010 GEB DAD P

vs.

J. MAYKEL, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed October 15, 2007, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on

defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way

to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:07-cv-00010-GEB-DAD Document 10 Filed 12/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 30, 2007.

DAD:lg

hows0010.fusm

Case 2:07-cv-00010-GEB-DAD Document 10 Filed 12/03/07 Page 2 of 2