Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00856/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00856-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOMER TYRONE LEWIS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

KATHLEEN ALISON, et al.,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:12-cv-00856-LJO-BAM (PC)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO REQUEST FOR 

ADMISSIONS

(ECF No. 76)

SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Homer Tyrone Lewis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 30, 2014, Defendants 

Alison, Parra and Garza filed a motion to dismiss. 

On May 19, 2014, Plaintiff served Requests for Admissions, Set One, on Defendants 

Alison, Parra and Garza. 

On August 15, 2014, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations on 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss, recommending partially granting the motion and dismissing the 

action as to Defendants Parra and Garza. 

On the same date, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust 

administrative remedies. The motion is pending. 

On October 15, 2014, Defendants Alison, Parra and Garza filed a request for an extension 

of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Requests for Admissions, Set One. Defendants explain that the 

Case 1:12-cv-00856-LJO-BAM Document 77 Filed 10/16/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

extension of time will permit the Court to rule on the pending motions and the Court’s rulings 

may obviate the need for any discovery responses. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants’ request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Requests for 

Admissions, Set One, is GRANTED;

2. Defendants’ responses to Plaintiff’s Requests for Admissions, Set One, are due on or 

before December 15, 2014. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 16, 2014 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00856-LJO-BAM Document 77 Filed 10/16/14 Page 2 of 2