Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07655/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07655-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT & STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEF.’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Case No. 3:18-cv-07655 MMC JCS

Scott P. Jang (State Bar No. 260191)

Hardev S. Chhokar (State Bar No. 311802) 

JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 

50 California Street, 9th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4615 

Telephone: (415) 394-9400 

Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 

E-mail: Scott.Jang@jacksonlewis.com

E-mail: Hardev.Chhokar@jacksonlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

LHOIST NORTH AMERICA OF ARIZONA, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICK OLAGUIBEL,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LHOIST NORTH AMERICA, a Corporation 

doing business in the State of California and 

Does 1-50, Inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:18-cv-07655 MMC JCS

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

TO COMPEL AND MOTION FOR 

SANCTIONS 

Complaint Filed: November 21, 2018 

Trial Date: June 15, 2020 

Case 3:18-cv-07655-MMC Document 48 Filed 10/10/19 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

2

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT & STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEF.’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Case No. 3:18-cv-07655 MMC JCS

Plaintiff Rick Olaguibel (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Lhoist North America of Arizona, 

Inc. (erroneously sued as Lhoist North America) (“Defendant”) have reached a settlement and are 

working on finalizing a written settlement agreement. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate 

and request the Court grant the following: 

1. The Parties shall work to finalize a written settlement agreement. The Parties will 

file a status report with the Court within 60 days if the case has not been dismissed pursuant to the 

terms of the Parties’ settlement agreement. 

2. Defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 42) and motion for sanctions (ECF No. 

43), which are currently set for hearing on October 25, 2019, are held in abeyance. In the event 

the Parties inform the Court that a final settlement agreement could not be reached, the Court will 

set a new opposition deadline and reschedule the hearing on Defendant’s motions. Defendant’s 

right to pursue the matters encompassed by the motions will not be affected or prejudiced by the 

current October 22, 2019, discovery deadline. 

3. In the event the Parties inform the Court that a final settlement agreement could 

not be reached, the fact discovery deadline for Defendant shall be extended to a reasonable date 

set by the Court. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 4, 2019 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 

By: __/s/ Scott P. Jang1

__________________ 

Scott P. Jang 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LHOIST NORTH AMERICA OF 

ARIZONA, INC. 

Dated: October 4, 2019 RICK OLAGUIBEL 

By: __/s/ Rick Olaguibel__________________ 

Proceeding Pro Se 

1

 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the ECF-filing party attests that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from each of the signatories. 

Case 3:18-cv-07655-MMC Document 48 Filed 10/10/19 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT & STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEF.’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Case No. 3:18-cv-07655 MMC JCS

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court orders as follows: 

1. The Parties shall work to finalize a written settlement agreement. The Parties shall

file a status report with the Court within 60 days of the date of this order if the case has not been 

dismissed pursuant to the terms of the Parties’ settlement agreement. 

2. Defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 42) and motion for sanctions (ECF No.

43), which are currently set for hearing on October 25, 2019, are held in abeyance. In the event 

the Parties inform the Court that a final settlement agreement could not be reached, the Court will 

set a new opposition deadline and reschedule the hearing on Defendant’s motions. Defendant’s 

right to pursue the matters encompassed by the motions will not be affected or prejudiced by the 

current October 22, 2019, discovery deadline. 

3. In the event the Parties inform the Court that a final settlement agreement could

not be reached, the fact discovery deadline for Defendant shall be extended to a reasonable date 

set by the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

____________________________________________

Senior U.S. District Court Judge Maxine M. Chesney 

4841-8219-8697, v. 1

Date: _______________ _____

_______________________________

or U.S. District Court Judge Maxine M October 10, 2019

deemed withdrawn without prejudice.

^

.

motions may be renoticed for

^

Case 3:18-cv-07655-MMC Document 48 Filed 10/10/19 Page 3 of 3