Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02935/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02935-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS HENDON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2935 FCD EFB P

vs.

KNOWLES, et al., 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants

 /

On October 26, 2009, the court found that plaintiff had attempted to initiate a civil action

without paying the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or requesting leave to proceed in

forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The court gave plaintiff 30 days to submit the

required filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis and warned him that failure to

do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The 30-day period

expired and plaintiff had not responded to that order. Therefore, on December 15, 2009, the

court recommended that this action be dismissed. On December 22, 2009, plaintiff filed

objections. Thereafter, on May 3, 2010, the court gave plaintiff an additional thirty days to

submit either the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and once again

admonished plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation of dismissal.

////

Case 2:09-cv-02935-FCD-EFB Document 8 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not paid the required filing fee or

requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: July 26, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02935-FCD-EFB Document 8 Filed 07/26/10 Page 2 of 2