Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00633/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00633-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On August 15, 2013, Helena Jones, wife of Plaintiff William Jones, Sr., filed a request for a 

review of the Court’s security film for July 24, 2013. (Doc. 70). Ms. Jones, who is not a party to this 

action, asserts review of the film footage is necessary to establish that she and Plaintiff filed Plaintiff’s

initial disclosure at the courthouse in this action on that date, because she did not see the filing on 

PACER. Id. 

First, Mrs. Jones is not a party in this case and lacks standing to file motions in this action. 

Second, Plaintiff’s filing was filed on July 23, 2013 and is reflected on the docket at entry number 69.1

 

1

Plaintiff is reminded that discovery documents are not to be filed with the Court. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1) “[D]isclosures 

under Rule 26(a)(1) or (2) and the following discovery requests and responses must not be filed until they are used in 

the proceeding or the court orders filing: depositions, interrogatories, requests for documents or tangible things or to permit 

entry onto land, and requests for admission.) Thus, discovery documents may be filed only when they constitute evidence 

WILLIAM RAY JONES, SR.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

LEHIGH SOUTHWEST CEMENT 

COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00633 - AWI - JLT

ORDER DISREGARDING THE REQUEST FOR 

REVIEW OF SECURITY FILM

(Doc. 70)

Case 1:12-cv-00633-AWI-JLT Document 71 Filed 08/19/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Therefore, the request for review of the Court’s security film is DISREGARDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 19, 2013 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

supporting a motion or the Court otherwise orders. Any further discovery documents sought to be filed will be 

rejected.

Case 1:12-cv-00633-AWI-JLT Document 71 Filed 08/19/13 Page 2 of 2