Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-00317/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-00317-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 09:0201 Petition to Compel/Stay Arbitration under an Insurance Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

----1 r-~·~L". i~~-f\ , I ~ ~. -i,,,, "··"' I JANG~~ 

CLERI< us DIS rRICT courn 

1 SOUTHERN YI STRICT OF CALIFOl,.NI/\ I 

lF:W · D!::P\JfY I t~,==-~--1-----"~•s~a-•-••• .,_,. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SKAZZI3 CAPITAL LIMITED, 

Petitioner, 

V. 

PATHWAY GENOMICS 

CORPORATION, 

Respondent. 

Case No.: 18cv317-BEN(KSC) 

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S 

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE 

A MOTION TO COMPEL [Doc. No. 

60); 

ORDER SETTING A DEADLINE 

FOR RESPONDENT TO OPPOSE/ 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S 

MOTION TO COMPEL [Doc. No. 61.) 

On February 8, 2018, petitioner SKAZZI3 Capital Limited filed a Petition to 

Enforce Arbitration Award against respondent Pathway Genomics Corporation. [Doc. 

No. l .] The Petition seeks to enforce a final judgment against respondent that was 

entered by the District Court on December 26, 2018. [Doc. No. 60, at p. 2.] 

Before the Court is petitioner's Ex Parte Application to File a Motion to Compel 

Discovery [Doc. No. 60] and petitioner's Notice of Lodgment, including a proposed 

Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 61-1, at pp. 1-10]. In the Ex Parte Application, petitioner 

requests an order allowing the filing of a Motion to Compel. The reason for the request is 

that respondent only served objections to all of petitioner's interrogatories and document 

I 

l 8cv3 l 7 -BEN(KSC) 

Case 3:18-cv-00317-BEN-KSC Document 64 Filed 01/08/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
1 requests without providing any substantive responses and then failed to cooperate in the 

2 meet and confer process despite several attempts by petitioner. [Doc. No. 60, at pp. 2-4.] 

3 The Ex Parte Application requests that the Court permit petitioner to file a Motion to 

4 Compel even though it has not been able to satisfy the meet and confer requirements. 

5 [Id.] 

6 Good cause appearing, the Court finds that petitioner's Ex Parte Application to file 

7 a Motion to Compel must be GRANTED. The Motion to Compel submitted with 

8 plaintiffs Notice of Lodgment, as well as the accompanying Declaration and exhibits 

9 [Doc. Nos. 61-1, 61-2, and 61-3], are deemed to have been filed as of December 23, 

10 2019, the date they were lodged with the Court. Accordingly, 

11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

12 

13 

1. 

2. 

Respondent's objections to petitioner's discovery requests are overruled. 

No later than January 31, 2020, respondent must either file and serve an 

14 opposition to petitioner's Motion to Compel or must provide the Court with proof that 

15 respondent served petitioner.with substantive responses to petitioner's Interrogatories 

16 (Set One) and petitioner's Request for Production of Documents (Set One). 

17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

18 Dated: January L, 2020 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Hon. Karen . rawford 

United States Magistrate Judge 

2 

18cv317-BEN(KSC) 

Case 3:18-cv-00317-BEN-KSC Document 64 Filed 01/08/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2