Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00906/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00906-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation and Proposed Order for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of Action (1:12-cv-0906 DAD-SKO)

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672

Attorney General of California

CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER, State Bar No. 230529

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

DIANA ESQUIVEL, State Bar No. 202954

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 445-4928

Facsimile: (916) 324-5205

E-mail: Diana.Esquivel@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendant Callow

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN FRATUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALLOW, 

Defendant.

No. 1:12-cv-00906 DAD-SKO (PC)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH 

PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO PARTIES’ 

STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL AND DENYING MOTIONS 

TO COMPEL AS MOOT

(Docs. 80, 83, and 90) 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff John Fratus 

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Callow stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with 

prejudice. 

Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, or expenses. There is no prevailing party in this 

action.

///

///

///

Case 1:12-cv-00906-DAD-SKO Document 91 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation and Proposed Order for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of Action (1:12-cv-0906 DAD-SKO)

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: December 18, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ John Fratus

John Fratus

Plaintiff Pro Se

Dated: December 18, 2015 KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

/s/ Diana Esquivel

DIANA ESQUIVEL

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Based on the parties’ stipulation, this action is HEREBY DISMISSED with prejudice

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and Plaintiff’s pending motions to compel (Doc. Nos. 80 & 83) 

are DENIED as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2016 

 DALE A. DROZD

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 1:12-cv-00906-DAD-SKO Document 91 Filed 01/05/16 Page 2 of 2