Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01889/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01889-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

DC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, 

INC. a/k/a DC TRANSPORT, 

INC.; IGOR PARFENOV; ANDREY 

PAVLOV; IGOR PARFENOV d/b/a 

DC TRANSPORT; YEVGENIY NIK 

BUGREYEV; and DOES 1-10, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-01889-GEB-CKD

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS 

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

Plaintiff‟s Status Report filed January 12, 2015 (“SR”)

reveals this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the 

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on 

January 26, 2015, is continued to April 6, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. A 

joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) 

days prior to the Status Conference.

DOE DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff states in the SR that it “expects to know the 

identity of any „Doe‟ defendants by March 20, 2015.” (SR 2:28-

3:1, ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff has until March 30, 2015, to file a 

motion in which leave is sought under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 15(a) to file an Amended Complaint substituting a named 

Case 2:14-cv-01889-GEB-CKD Document 25 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

defendant in place of a Doe defendant. The referenced motion must 

be noticed for hearing on the Court‟s earliest available law and 

motion date. If leave is not sought as stated, Does 1-10 will be 

automatically dismissed from this action.

DEFAULT PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff states in the SR that it “anticipates only 

one of the defendants may possibly appear,” and “anticipates 

filing an application for default judgment . . . within the next 

several months, by no later than March 13, 2015.” (Id. at 1:24-

27, 2:20-22.) 

Plaintiff shall take the steps necessary to prosecute 

this action as a default matter concerning Defendants DC 

Transportation Services, Inc.; Igor Parfenov, individually and 

dba DC Transport; and Yevgeniy Bugreyev no later than March 13, 

2015. Plaintiff shall either file whatever documents are required 

to prosecute this case as a default matter against these 

defendants or Show Cause in a writing filed why these defendants 

should not be dismissed for failure of prosecution. These 

defendants may be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 41(b) if Plaintiff fails to timely respond to 

this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-01889-GEB-CKD Document 25 Filed 01/22/15 Page 2 of 2