Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00733/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00733-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 690
Nature of Suit: Other Forfeiture and Penalty Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8647

NINTH STREET, SAN JOAQUIN,

FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,

APN: 033-091-24, INCLUDING ALL

APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS

THERETO,

Defendant.

 /

1:05-cv-00733-AWI-SMS 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 34)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

SECOND MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT (Doc. 31)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO VACATE

PREVIOUS ENTRIES OF DEFAULT

(Docs. 15-16)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF

The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72-302(c)(19) and

72-303. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion

for default judgment (Doc. 31). A previous motion for default

judgment was considered and denied on August 18, 2006 (Doc. 28).

On July 30, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a

Recommendation that Plaintiff’s second motion for default

judgment be granted (Doc. 34). The Findings and Recommendation

were served on all parties and contained notice that any

Case 1:05-cv-00733-AWI -SMS Document 35 Filed 09/12/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed

within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. 

To date, the parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed July 30, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Clerk of Court VACATE the entry of default as to

Jose Luis Mandujano and Leticia Espino Mandujano previously

entered on December 21, 2005 (Docs. 15-16), and ENTER forthwith

default as to Jose Luis Mandujano and Leticia Espino Mandujano;

3. Plaintiff’s second motion for default judgment, filed

May 3, 2007, is GRANTED; and,

4. Plaintiff is entitled to, and the Clerk ENTER, judgment

as follows:

(A) The interest/s of Jose Luis Mandujano, Leticia

Espino Mandujano, and Jose Mario Barrera Olivares in the

Defendant real property are forfeited to the United States of

America;

(B) The right, title, and interest of potential

claimants Jose Luis Mandujano, Leticia Espino Mandujano, and Jose

Mario Barrera Olivares in the Defendant property are forfeited to

Case 1:05-cv-00733-AWI -SMS Document 35 Filed 09/12/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

the United States of America pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6),

and are vested in the United States of America; and,

(C) All persons claiming any right, title, or interest

in or to the Defendant property have defaulted and no longer have

any right, title, or interest in the Defendant property

whatsoever; and,

5. The Clerk of Court ENTER final judgment of forfeiture

for Plaintiff, United States of America.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 10, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00733-AWI -SMS Document 35 Filed 09/12/07 Page 3 of 3