Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02903/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02903-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHNATHAN S. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2903 MCE EFB P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS 

AND REHABILITATION, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On January 18, 2007, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. The

order explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint

correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. By orders filed February 22,

2007, and April 12, 2007, plaintiff was granted additional time in which to file his amended

complaint. 

The 30-day period granted by the order filed April 12, 2007, has expired and plaintiff has

not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the order.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110. 

Case 2:06-cv-02903-DOC Document 22 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: June 27, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-02903-DOC Document 22 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 2