Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-343/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. 07-5944-SC, MDL No. 1917

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

Case No. 07-5944 SC 

MDL No. 1917 

This Document Relates to: 

Individual Case No. CV 11-5514 

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. and KMART 

CORP., 

 Plaintiffs. 

 v. 

CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD., et 

al., 

 Defendants 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3843 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. 07-5944-SC, MDL No. 1917 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing 

therefore, orders as follows: 

1. All claims asserted by plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co., and Kmart Corp., 

against defendants Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI 

Mexico S.A. De C.V., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Shenzhen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Tianjin 

Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd (collectively “Samsung SDI”) 

are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. 

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

3. This Order is not a dismissal of any person or entity other than Samsung SDI. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

This ____ day of _________________, 2015. _________________________________ 

HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

13 May

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3843 Filed 05/13/15 Page 2 of 2