Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03339/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03339-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK M. McCOLLUM,

Plaintiff,

 v.

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 04-3339 CRB

ORDER

Now before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss based on statute of limitations. 

In its Order filed December 13, 2007, the Court continued the motion to allow plaintiffs to

file a response to defendants’ reply brief calculation of the statute of limitations as to certain

grievances. Plaintiffs have advised the Court that they do not dispute the calculation. 

Accordingly, as set forth in the December 13, 2007 Order, defendants’ motion to dismiss the

claims set forth on pages 7-8 of their Reply as barred by the statute of limitations is

GRANTED. This dismissal includes claims emanating from Capogreco grievance No.

MCSP-97-00390, Mourland grievance filed on November 20, 2002, and Collins grievance

No. SQ-02-1251 submitted April 17, 2002.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2008 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-03339-CRB Document 251 Filed 01/08/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case 3:04-cv-03339-CRB Document 251 Filed 01/08/08 Page 2 of 2