Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00906/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00906-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The USA initiated this action on June 23, 2016. (Doc. 1) The USA filed proof of service of the 

summonses and complaint on July 18, 2016. (Docs. 4, 5, 6) Nevertheless, Eliseo Jara, Jr. and Sergio 

Jara have not responded to the complaint. In the joint scheduling report, the government reports that 

Eliseo Jara, Jr. and Sergio Jara served answers on the government, but, it is apparent, neither defendant 

filed their answer in Court. Thus, they are in default.

The case is in the same posture as when it was supposed to be scheduled on October 4, 2016. 

(Doc. 8) Given this situation, the Court will be unable, once again, to schedule this case on November 

23, 2016, as planned. Id. Therefore, the Court ORDERS:

1. The scheduling conference is CONTINUED to December 28, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. before 

Judge Thurston at the United States Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA1;

 

1

In the event Eliseo Jara, Jr. and Sergio Jara wish to appear at the conference by telephone, no later than November 30, 

2016, they SHALL file a request asking the Court issue a writ ad testificandum to allow them to appear by telephone.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ELISEO JARA, JR., et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00906 AWI JLT 

ORDER TO DEFENDANTS ELISEO JARA JR. 

AND SERGIO JARA TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

ENTRY OF DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE 

IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO APPEAR IN 

THIS ACTION AND TO FILE A RESPONSIVE 

PLEADING

Case 1:16-cv-00906-AWI-JLT Document 11 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. No later than November 30, 2016, Eliseo Jara, Jr. and Sergio Jara SHALL show cause 

in writing why default should not be entered against them for their failure to appear in this action and 

for their failure to file a responsive document. Alternatively, they may file their responsive document 

no later than November 30, 2016.

Eliseo Jara, Jr. and Sergio Jara are advised that their failure to comply with this order 

will result in the entry of default.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00906-AWI-JLT Document 11 Filed 11/16/16 Page 2 of 2