Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00800/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00800-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Virgil E. Holt is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On July 30, 2015, the Court issued a second scheduling order. (ECF No. 149.)

On August 17, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for clarification of the second scheduling order. 

(ECF No. 150.) Plaintiff correctly points out that the second scheduling order inadvertently omitted 

the fact that the action is proceeding against Defendant Nicholas, Holguin, Ortega, Machado, and 

Juden on Plaintiff’s claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in addition to the 

excessive force and failure to intervene. 

///

///

///

///

VIRGIL E. HOLT,

 Plaintiff,

v.

R. NICHOLAS, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:09-cv-00800-AWI-SAB (PC)

AMENDMENT TO SECOND

SCHEDULING ORDER

[ECF Nos. 149, 150]

Case 1:09-cv-00800-SAB Document 151 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, the second scheduling order is amended to reflect that this action proceeds 

against Defendants Nicholas, Holguin, Ortega, Machado, and Juden for excessive force, failure to 

intervene and deliberate indifference to a serious medical need, and against Defendant Velasco for 

deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 19, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00800-SAB Document 151 Filed 08/19/15 Page 2 of 2