Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05150/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05150-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY T. CRIADO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:04-CV-5150-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO

RESPOND TO SECOND SCHEDULING

ORDER AND NOTIFY COURT WHETHER

THEY CONSENT TO OR DECLINE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION

(Doc. 41)

On March 28, 2006, the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case issued the Second Scheduling

Order, which in relevant part required defendants to notify the Court within thirty days whether they

consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. More than thirty days have passed and

defendants have not responded.

Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, defendants shall comply with

the Court’s order of March 28, 2006, requiring them to notify the Court whether they consent to or

decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. If defendants’ counsel needs more than fifteen days within

which to consult with his clients, counsel shall so notify the Court and the Court will extend the

deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05150-AWI -SMS Document 43 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 1