Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02670/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02670-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOEY LOVE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2670 WBS EFB P

vs.

K. PROSPER, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. §

1983.

On May 8, 2007, defendants Aston, Grenert and Harrington moved to dismiss this action

with respect to them upon the ground that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies

prior to filing suit. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b); 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. On February 8, 2007, the court

informed plaintiff of the requirements for filing an opposition to the motion, that failure to

oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion and that failure to

comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation of dismissal. On June 26, 2007,

the court again reminded plaintiff of his obligation to file an opposition or statement of no

opposition, gave plaintiff 20 days to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition and

warned him that failure to do so could result in dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

Case 2:06-cv-02670-WBS-EFB Document 18 Filed 08/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The 20 days have passed and plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of no

opposition. He has not otherwise responded to the June 26, 2007, order. 

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: August 14, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-02670-WBS-EFB Document 18 Filed 08/14/07 Page 2 of 2