Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03531/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03531-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

- 1 -

SCHEDULING ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03531-MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICES OF ABE LAMPART, P.C.

ABE LAMPART (SBN 92406, NYS Bar #1653633)

CHRISTINE PHAM (SBN 227033)

456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1300

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415-274-0999

Facsimile: 415-274-2563

Email address: abe@lampartlaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

KAPU GEMS and KAPU GEMS LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

KAPU GEMS and KAPU GEMS LTD.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC. and YAIR 

YACHDAV, 

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03531-MMC

[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

COMPLAINT

Defendants Diamond Imports, Inc. and Yair Yachdav (collectively, “Defendants”) having 

moved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiffs Kapu Gems and 

Kapu Gems Ltd. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss having been 

scheduled for November 13, 2015, and

Plaintiffs and Defendants having stipulated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A) and USDC 

Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), through their respective counsel, that because 

Plaintiffs’ counsel has a previously scheduled hearing on November 13, 2015 in an arbitration before 

the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority entitled Christensen v. Nauman, et al., FINRA Case No. 

14-03870 and therefore cannot appear before this Court on that date, the hearing on Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss should be rescheduled to a date mutually agreeable to the parties and the Court; 

Case 3:15-cv-03531-MMC Document 32 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

SCHEDULING ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03531-MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following schedule on 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is established:

(1) Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is due October 23, 2015; 

(2) Defendants’ reply in further support of their Motion to Dismiss is due October 30, 2015; 

and 

(3) A hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be held on December 4, 2015 at 9:00 

AM before this Court in Courtroom 7 of the above-entitled Court, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 

19th Floor, San Francisco, California 94102.

___________________________

Maxine M. Chesney

Dated:

October 28, 2015

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-03531-MMC Document 32 Filed 10/28/15 Page 2 of 2