Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-02101/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-02101-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983pr Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

3:18-cv-02101-BAS-KSC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT H. OUTMAN,

CDCR #P-79939,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DANIEL PARAMO, Warden; 

S. SANCHEZ, Captain; WILLIAMS, 

Correctional Counselor I; C. YORK, CCI; 

M. VILLATUERLE, CCII; B. VOGEL, 

CCI; B. OLIVARRIA, Appeals 

Coordinator; B. SELF; K. RODRIGUEZ, 

Psychologist; S. BAHRO, Ph.D 

Psychologist; JOHN & JANE DOES 1-10, 

Supervisory Mental Health Staff; 

JOHN & JANE DOES 1-10, 

Custody Staff,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:18-cv-02101-BAS-KSC

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff Robert H. Outman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis. He brings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various prison officials and 

employees. On June 11, 2019, Defendants B. Vogel, R. Olivarria, S. Bahro, S. Searles

Case 3:18-cv-02101-BAS-KSC Document 34 Filed 01/31/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

3:18-cv-02101-BAS-KSC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(formerly Sanchez), K. Rodriguez, B. Self, D. Paramo, M. Villafuerte, and C. York moved 

to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims against them. (ECF No. 22.) Magistrate Judge Karen S. 

Crawford issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this Court 

grant the motion to dismiss as to all of the Defendants named in the Complaint. (ECF No. 

32.)

On December 19, 2019, the Court issued an order adopting Judge Crawford’s R&R

and granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 33.) The Court dismissed 

Plaintiffs’ Complaint in its entirety but granted Plaintiff leave to file a First Amended 

Complaint. In its Order, the Court stated: “If Plaintiff chooses to amend his Complaint, he 

must file the First Amended Complaint no later than January 21, 2020. The Court 

warns Plaintiff that a failure to file a First Amended Complaint by January 21, 2020, 

will result in the Court dismissing this action and closing the case.” (Id. at 3.)

This deadline has passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or a 

motion requesting an extension of time. “If a plaintiff does not take advantage of the 

opportunity to fix his complaint, a district court may convert the dismissal of the complaint 

into dismissal of the entire action.” Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 1169 (9th Cir. 2005).

Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff’s action in its entirety and instructs the Clerk to 

close the case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 31, 2020

Case 3:18-cv-02101-BAS-KSC Document 34 Filed 01/31/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2