Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01512/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01512-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL BRODHEIM,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1512 LKK GGH P

vs.

LOUIE DININNI, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On August 11, 2006, plaintiff filed an objection to the order denying motion for

the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff’s objection is construed as a request for reconsideration of

the magistrate judge’s order filed July 27, 2006, denying plaintiff’s motion for the appointment

of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that

it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed July 27, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: September 11, 2006. 

Case 2:05-cv-01512-LKK-GGH Document 23 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 1