Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_11-cv-00159/USCOURTS-casd-3_11-cv-00159-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 11cv0159

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OUCH CHOURP,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 11cv0159 - IEG (JMA)

ORDER:

(1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

(2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS

[Doc. No. 6]

vs.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

formally doing business as NEW CENTURY

MORTGAGE CORPORATION; WESTERN

PROGRESSIVE, LLC; and DOES 1 through

50 inclusive,

Defendants.

This is a mortgage case. Plaintiff Ouch Chourp, acting pro se, filed suit in San Diego

Superior Court in late 2010, and Defendants removed the action to this Court. On April 22, 2011,

the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss and granted Plaintiff leave to amend. [Doc. No.

5.] In doing so, the Court stated that if Plaintiff wished to file an amended complaint, “she should

do so within 21 days of the filing of this order.” [Id.]

More than 21 days later, on May 25, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to

Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Doc. No. 6.] Rather than filing an amended

complaint, Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to Defendants’ motion. [Doc. No. 7.] 

Defendants filed a reply in which they requested judicial notice that Plaintiff had filed another

complaint in San Diego Superior Court. [Doc. No. 12.]

Case 3:11-cv-00159-IEG-JMA Document 14 Filed 07/01/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 11cv0159

The Court construes Plaintiff’s response in opposition as a motion for leave to file an

amended complaint and GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. Accordingly, the Court DENIES

Defendants’ motion to dismiss.

If Plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint, she must do so within 21 days of the

filing of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 21 days, and upon notice

from Defendants, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice. Plaintiff’s amended complaint

should only make the revisions discussed in the Court’s April 22, 2011 Order, [Doc. No. 5], must

be a complete document without reference to any prior pleading, and should not add any new

causes of action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 1, 2011

IRMA E. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Case 3:11-cv-00159-IEG-JMA Document 14 Filed 07/01/11 Page 2 of 2