Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01377/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01377-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY WATSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0123 MCE KJM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

LaMERLE JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1375 MCE KJM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

JOSEPH M. FREEMAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1376 MCE KJM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Case 2:10-cv-01377-MCE -KJM Document 4 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 The motion was filed in case CIV S-10-0123 MCE KJM P by plaintiff Watson on 1

behalf of the other plaintiffs.

2

VICTOR COOPER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1377 MCE KJM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

JASON FRANKS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1378 MCE KJM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

On June 16, 2010, plaintiffs filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed June 4, 2010, severing plaintiffs’ claims. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), 1

a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon

review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling

was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed June 4, 2010, is affirmed. 

Dated: June 25, 2010

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-01377-MCE -KJM Document 4 Filed 06/28/10 Page 2 of 2