Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01395/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01395-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GS L. LOVE El, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TROY NUNLEY, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:19-cv-01395-KJM-KJN PS 

ORDER 

 On January 27, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 

602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 

de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 

by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 

. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

///// 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:19-cv-01395-KJM-KJN Document 12 Filed 02/28/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 

 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 27, 2020, are ADOPTED. 

 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

DATED: February 27, 2020. 

Case 2:19-cv-01395-KJM-KJN Document 12 Filed 02/28/20 Page 2 of 2