Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-4_04-cv-03331/USCOURTS-alnd-4_04-cv-03331-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

MIDDLE DIVISION

ANA MARIA CHAMBERS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. CV-04-PT-03331-M

)

MERRILL LYNCH & COMPANY, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After consideration of the cases cited by the parties subsequent to the court’s earlier

Memorandum Opinion, the court concludes that the defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration

and for Stay Pending Arbitration is due to be granted. The court particularly notes the following

cases: Bevere v. Oppenheimer & Co., 862 F.Supp. 1243 (D. N.J. 1994); AmSouth Bank v. Dees,

847 So.2d 923 (Ala. 2002); Cook's Pest Control, Inc. v. Boykin, 807 So.2d 524 (Ala. 2001);

Capitol Chevrolet and Imports, Inc. v. Grantham, 784 So.2d 285 (Ala. 2000); Merrill Lynch,

Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Kirton, 719 So.2d 201 (Ala. 1998); and Ex parte Dyess, 709

So.2d 447 (Ala. 1997).

Within 7 days, the defendant will submit and serve a proposed order. The plaintiff will

have 7 days after service to object as to form. 

This 7th of February, 2005.

 

 ROBERT B. PROPST

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

FILED

 2005 Feb-07 PM 03:35

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 4:04-cv-03331-RBP Document 15 Filed 02/07/05 Page 1 of 1