Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01556/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01556-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS HAUSCHILD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF RICHMOND AND

CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-01556 WHA

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Plaintiff Thomas Hauschild has filed an administrative motion to file under seal three

exhibits he appended in support of his motion for partial summary judgment. These exhibits are

portions of and exhibits to the Dickerson deposition; portions of and exhibits to Walle

deposition; and exhibits to the Threets deposition. Under Civil Local Rule 79(e)(1), the

“designating party must file a declaration . . . establishing that all designated material is

sealable” within four days of the filing of the administrative motion. Plaintiff filed the motion

to seal on June 2, 2016, but defendants (the designating party) have not filed any declaration

establishing that all designated material is sealable. Accordingly, the administrative motion to

file Exhibits A–C under seal is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2016. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-01556-WHA Document 77 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 1