Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00060/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00060-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES FORDJOUR, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

KINGS COUNTY SHERIFF CHRIS )

JORDAN, et al., 

)

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:09-cv—00060-OWW-SKO-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DENY

PETITIONER’S MOTIONS FOR

IMMEDIATE RELEASE, ISSUANCE OF

AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, IMMEDIATE

RELEASE, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 

(DOCS. 23, 6, 7)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

ostensibly pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter has been

referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)

and Local Rules 302 and 303.

On June 29, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and

recommendations that the Court deny Petitioner’s motions for

immediate release, immediate release on his own recognizance,

issuance of an order to show cause, and injunctive relief. These

findings and recommendations were served on all parties. On

August 10, 2010, Petitioner mailed untimely objections (Doc. 25,

1

Case 1:09-cv-00060-OWW -SKO Document 27 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4) that were filed in this Court on August 16, 2010. The Court

has nevertheless considered the objections filed by Petitioner.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

The undersigned has carefully reviewed the entire file and has

considered the objections; the undersigned has determined there

is no need to modify the findings and recommendations based on

the points raised in the objections. The Court finds that the

report and recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on June 29, 2010,

are ADOPTED in full; and 

2. Petitioner’s motions for immediate release, immediate

release on his own recognizance, issuance of an order to show

cause, and injunctive relief are DENIED.IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 20, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-00060-OWW -SKO Document 27 Filed 08/20/10 Page 2 of 2