Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01955/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01955-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

ROCKY D. MARQUEZ, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIV 05-01955 PHX SRB MEA

)

JOSEPH ARPAIO, ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

) 

 Defendant. )

_______________________________)

Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 30, 2005. On

August 4, 2005, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to

complete and return a service packet for Defendant Arpaio by

August 24, 2005. That order warned Plaintiff that his failure

to timely comply with the provisions of the order would result

in the dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Rule 4(b), Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Plaintiff was warned that his failure to acquire a

waiver of service from Defendant Arpaio or to complete service

of process on Defendant within 120 days of the date that he

filed his complaint, by October 27, 2005, would result in the

dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m), Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure, and Rule 16.2(b)(2)(B), of the United States

District Court for the District of Arizona Local Rules of Civil

Procedure. The civil docket in this matter indicates that

Case 2:05-cv-01955-SRB-MEA Document 7 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

Plaintiff has failed to acquire a waiver of service from

Defendant or to complete service of process on Defendant.

On November 15, 2005, the Court allowed Plaintiff

until December 15, 2005, to show cause why this case should not

be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to effect service of

process on Defendant as required by the Court’s order of August

4, 2005, and Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff has failed to show cause for his failure to abide by

the Court’s orders and to effect service of process on

Defendant. 

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this case be

dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to serve the Defendant in this

matter and for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s

order of August 4, 2005, and Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DATED this 20th day of December, 2005.

Case 2:05-cv-01955-SRB-MEA Document 7 Filed 12/21/05 Page 2 of 2