Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01617/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01617-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

James J. Arendt, Esq. Bar No. 142937

Roy C. Santos, Esq. Bar No. 259718

WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP

1630 East Shaw Avenue, Suite 176

Fresno, California 93710

Telephone: (559) 221-5256

Facsimile: (559) 221-5262

Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF FRESNO, DAVID ALANIS, and LINDA PENNER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES LORAN QUINN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF, FRESNO

COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT,

OFFICER DAVID ALANIS, OFFICER

LEONARD RICHERT, FRESNO COUNTY

DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FRESNO

COUNTY JAIL, ET AL. and DOES 1 to 100

INCLUSIVE,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-01617-LJO-BAM

ORDER AMENDING THE SCHEDULING

ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR

DESIGNATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES

AND RULE 26 REPORTS

IT IS HEREBYSTIPULATED between the parties, through theirrespective counsel, and ordered

by this Court, that the Scheduling Order, Doc. No. 47, be amended and that the date for designating

expert witnesses and produce their Rule 26 expert reports be moved from January 9, 2012, to March 9,

2012. There is good cause for extending these dates. First, discovery in the matter is not set to close

until March 9, 2012, and requiring such early disclosure of experts before the discovery cutoff date will

result in the needless expense in both time and resources on the preparation of supplemental reports to

address any newly discovered evidence. As such, it appears that the deadline agreed to in the Scheduling

Order, with regard to designation of expert witnesses and preparation of their Rule 26 expert reports, was

a bit too optimistic. Furthermore, the proposed amended deadlines do not alter the pretrial conference

Case 1:10-cv-01617-LJO-BAM Document 58 Filed 01/03/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

nor the trial date as agreed to in the Scheduling Order, Doc. No. 47.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: January 3, 2012 WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP

By: /s/ Roy C. Santos 

James J. Arendt

Roy C. Santos

Attorneys for Defendants

DATED: January 3, 2012 By: /s/ David M. Hollingsworth 

David M. Hollingsworth

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Upon reviewing the Stipulation and for good cause being shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that expert witness disclosures by any party, including supplemental expert witness disclosures by any

party, shall be served no later than March 9, 2012. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 3, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

10c20k UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-01617-LJO-BAM Document 58 Filed 01/03/12 Page 2 of 2