Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01972/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01972-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE — C-05-01972 RMW 

MAG

E-FILED on 7/25/08

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ADESH TYAGI,

Plaintiff,

v.

VIKRAM LAMBA, BS LAMBA, and

SHIKHA SAWHNEY,

Defendants.

Case No. C-05-01972 RMW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On September 30, 2005, the court denied without prejudice plaintiff's motion for default

judgment as to defendants after finding that the damages sought were not sufficiently supported and that

default had been entered as to only two of the three defendants. Since the time the court issued that

order, there has been no further action in this matter. Nearly three years have elapsed since any

substantive action has taken place in this case, therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff file a written response by August 11, 2008 showing

cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to diligently prosecute. 

Case 5:05-cv-01972-RMW Document 12 Filed 07/25/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE — C-05-01972 RMW 

MAG

2

If plaintiffs fail to comply with this order or fail to show good reason for their failure to

diligently prosecute, the case will be dismissed.

DATED: 7/25/08

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01972-RMW Document 12 Filed 07/25/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE — C-05-01972 RMW 

MAG

3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff(s):

Ashwin Virji Ladva aladva@yahoo.com 

Counsel for Defendant(s):

No appearance

Each party's counsel is responsible for ensuring that co-counsel receives a copy of this order if cocounsel has not registered for e-filing pursuant to the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 7/25/08 /s/ MAG

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:05-cv-01972-RMW Document 12 Filed 07/25/08 Page 3 of 3