Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01207/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01207-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

- 1 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING LABOR CODE § 226.7 CLAIM FOR REST BREAK VIOLATIONS WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND (C 10-01207 JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALBERT LOPEZ, as an individual and RENE

POMPA, as an individual, both on behalf of 

others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , a national 

association, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

 Defendants. 

CASE NO.: CV 10-01207 JL 

(Assigned to the Hon. James Larson, Ctrm. F) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING LABOR

CODE § 226.7 CLAIM FOR REST BREAK

VIOLATIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

Case 3:10-cv-01207-JST Document 11 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:10-cv-01207-JL Document10-1 Filed05/06/10 Page1 of 3
- 2 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING LABOR CODE § 226.7 CLAIM FOR REST BREAK VIOLATIONS WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND (C 10-01207 JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation To Dismiss Labor Code § 226.7 

Claim For Rest Break Violations Without Prejudice And For Leave To Amend (“Stipulation”). The 

Court, having considered the Stipulation, now finds that the Stipulation should be granted. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED as follows: 

1. Plaintiffs Albert Lopez’s and Renee Pompa’s (“Plaintiffs”) Labor Code § 226.7 

Claim For Rest Break Violations is hereby dismissed without prejudice. No notice shall be sent to the 

putative class of this dismissal. 

2. Plaintiffs and Defendants Bank of America, N.A., Bank of America 

Corporation, and Banc of America Investment Services, Inc.’s (“Defendants”) shall bear their own 

costs and attorneys’ fees in connection with the dismissal of the Labor Code § 226.7 Claim For Rest 

Break Violations. 

3. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file the Third Amended Complaint, attached as 

Exhibit A to the Stipulation, which shall be filed and served within five (5) days after this Order. 

4. The Answer of Defendant Bank of America, N.A. to Plaintiffs’ First Amended 

Complaint, filed in the Superior Court for the County of Alameda on March 19, 2008, and made a part 

of this Court’s record through Defendant Bank of America Corporation’s Notice of Removal, filed on 

March 23, 2010, shall be deemed to be the Answer of Defendants to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended 

Complaint, and it will not be necessary for Defendants to file an Answer to the Third Amended 

Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________ ____________________________________ 

Honorable James Larson 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case3:10-cv-01207-JL Document10-1 Filed05/06/10 Page2 of 3

May 7, 2010

Case 3:10-cv-01207-JST Document 11 Filed 05/07/10 Page 2 of 3
- 3 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING LABOR CODE § 226.7 CLAIM FOR REST BREAK VIOLATIONS WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND (C 10-01207 JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Respectfully submitted: 

DATED: May 6, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH H. YOON 

 By: /s/ 

 Kenneth H. Yoon 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

ALBERT LOPEZ AND RENE POMPA 

DATED: May 6, 2010 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 Maria A. Audero 

Attorney for Defendants 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA 

CORPORATION, AND BANC OF AMERICA 

INVESTMENTS SERVICES, INC. 

Case 3:10-cv-01207-JST Document 11 Filed 05/07/10 Page 3 of 3 Case3:10-cv-01207-JL Document10-1 Filed05/06/10 Page3 of 3