Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-01946/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-01946-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 13-cv-1946 BLF (PSG)

EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777)

shosie@hosielaw.com 

DIANE S. RICE (CA Bar No. 118303) 

drice@hosielaw.com

ANTHONY K. LEE (CA Bar No. 156018) 

alee@hosielaw.com

DARRELL R. ATKINSON (CA Bar

No. 280564) 

datkinson@hosielaw.com 

HOSIE RICE LLP

600 Montgomery Street, 34th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

(415) 247-6000 Tel. 

(415) 247-6001 Fax

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FITEQ, INC.

DAVID E. ROGERS (pro hac vice)

drogers@swlaw.com 

PATRICIA LEE REFO (pro hac vice) 

prefo@swlaw.com 

DAVID G. BARKER (pro hac vice)

dbarker@swlaw.com

JACOB C. JONES (pro hac vice)

jcjones@swlaw.com

SID LEACH (AZ Bar 019519) 

sleach@swlaw.com 

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

One Arizona Center

400 E. Van Buren, Suite 1900 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 

Telephone: 602.382.6000 

Facsimile: 602.382.6070 

Attorneys for Defendants 

VENTURE CORPORATION, LTD., AND 

CEBELIAN HOLDING PTE, LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FITEQ, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

VENTURE CORPORATION, LTD., and 

CEBELIAN HOLDING PTE, LTD. 

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-1946 BLF (PSG)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S 

TIME IN WHICH TO FILE AN 

OPPOSITION, AND DEFENDANTS’ 

TIME IN WHICH TO FILE A REPLY, 

TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

EXCLUDE TESTIMONY ABOUT 

FITEQ’S ALLEGED LOST PROFITS 

AND ENTERPRISE VALUE

 Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor

 The Honorable Beth Labson Freeman 

Case 5:13-cv-01946-BLF Document 304 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Case No. 13-cv-1946 BLF (PSG)

EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Plaintiff FiTeq, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “FiTeq”) and defendants Venture Corporation 

Ltd., and Cebelian Holding PTE, Ltd. (collectively “Defendants” or “Venture”), hereby 

stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows: 

WHEREAS, Defendants will file on September 17, 2015 Defendants’ Motion to 

Exclude Testimony About FiTeq’s Alleged Lost Profits and Enterprise Value (“Defendants’ 

Motion to Exclude”) (see Dkt. No. 296 at 3), and the hearing date for that motion is reserved 

for December 10, 2015; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3 FiTeq’s Opposition to Defendants’ 

Motion to Exclude (the “Opposition”) would be due October 1, 2015 and Defendants Reply 

in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Exclude (the “Reply”) would be due October 8, 2015; 

WHEREAS, key counsel for Plaintiff are out of the country for much of the second 

half of September; 

WHEREAS, key counsel for Defendants are out of office for various days in mid-tolate October; 

WHEREAS, in light of counsel’s schedules, and as a mutual accommodation, the 

parties agree that the due date for the Opposition is extended to October 20, 2015, and the 

due date for the Reply is extended to November 3, 2015; 

WHEREAS, the parties have not previously received extensions of time for filing the 

Opposition and Reply; and 

WHEREAS, the parties do not believe that the requested extensions will affect or 

change the other dates currently scheduled by the Court; 

WHEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES: 

(1) That Defendants will serve and file their Motion to Exclude by September 17, 

2015; 

Case 5:13-cv-01946-BLF Document 304 Filed 09/17/15 Page 2 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Case No. 13-cv-1946 BLF (PSG)

EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(2) That FiTeq will have to and including October 20, 2015 to serve and file its 

Opposition; and

(3) That Defendants will have to and including November 3, 2015 to serve and 

file their Reply.

Dated: September 16, 2015 HOSIE RICE LLP

 By: /s/ Darrell R. Atkinson 

 Darrell R. Atkinson 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff FiTeq, Inc.

 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

 By: /s/ David Barker

 David Barker 

Attorneys for Defendants Venture Corp. and 

Cebelian Holding Pte, Ltd. 

 

I hereby attest pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) that concurrence in the 

electronic filing of this document has been attained from the other signatories. 

Dated: September 16, 2015 

 By: /s/ Darrell R. Atkinson 

 Darrell R. Atkinson 

Case 5:13-cv-01946-BLF Document 304 Filed 09/17/15 Page 3 of 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 Case No. 13-cv-1946 BLF (PSG)

EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) Defendants will serve and file their Motion to Exclude Testimony About 

FiTeq’s Alleged Lost Profits and Enterprise Value by September 17, 2015; 

(2) FiTeq will have to and including October 20, 2015 to serve and file its 

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Testimony About FiTeq’s Alleged Lost Profits

and Enterprise Value; and

(3) Defendants will have to and including November 3, 2015 to serve and file 

their Reply in Support of their Motion to Exclude Testimony About FiTeq’s Alleged Lost 

Profits and Enterprise Value. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 17, 2015 ______________________________________ 

 Honorable Beth Labson Freeman

 United States District Judge

Case 5:13-cv-01946-BLF Document 304 Filed 09/17/15 Page 4 of 6
ATKINSON DECL. IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND Case No. 13-cv-1946 BLF (PSG)

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777)

shosie@hosielaw.com 

DIANE S. RICE (CA Bar No. 118303) 

drice@hosielaw.com

ANTHONY K. LEE (CA Bar No. 156018) 

alee@hosielaw.com

DARRELL R. ATKINSON (CA Bar

No. 280564) 

datkinson@hosielaw.com 

HOSIE RICE LLP

600 Montgomery Street, 34th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

(415) 247-6000 Tel. 

(415) 247-6001 Fax

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FITEQ, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FITEQ, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

VENTURE CORPORATION, LTD., and 

CEBELIAN HOLDING PTE, LTD. 

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-1946 BLF (PSG)

DECLARATION OF DARRELL R. 

ATKINSON IN SUPPORT OF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S 

TIME IN WHICH TO FILE AN 

OPPOSITION, AND DEFENDANTS’ 

TIME IN WHICH TO FILE A REPLY, 

TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

EXCLUDE TESTIMONY ABOUT 

FITEQ’S ALLEGED LOST PROFITS 

AND ENTERPRISE VALUE

 Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor

 The Honorable Beth Labson Freeman 

Case 5:13-cv-01946-BLF Document 304 Filed 09/17/15 Page 5 of 6
ATKINSON DECL. IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND 1 Case No. 13-cv-1946 BLF (PSG)

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

I, Darrell R. Atkinson, declare as follows: 

1. I am one of the attorneys of record in this matter for Plaintiff FiTeq, Inc. 

(“Plaintiff” or “FiTeq”). I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge. If called 

upon to do so I could and would testify competently to the matters stated herein. 

2. Key counsel for Plaintiff are out of the country for much of the second half of 

September. Additionally, key counsel for Defendants are out of office for a number of days 

in mid-to-late October. Given the absence of key counsel for both parties in the months of 

September and October, including the absence of key plaintiff counsel during the period 

under Civil Local Rule 7-3 in which Plaintiff would have to prepare its Opposition to 

Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Testimony About FiTeq’s Alleged Lost Profits and 

Enterprise Value if the motion is filed on September 17, 2015, and the absence of key 

defense counsel during the period under Civil Local Rule 7-3 in which Defendants would 

have to prepare their Reply in Support of their motion if Plaintiff’s time to oppose is 

extended, the parties require additional time to prepare their respective papers. 

3. The parties have not previously received extensions of time for filing the 

opposition to, or reply in support of, Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Testimony About 

FiTeq’s Alleged Lost Profits and Enterprise Value.

4. The parties do not believe that the requested extensions will affect or change 

the other dates currently scheduled by the Court. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and this 

declaration is executed at San Francisco, California on September 16, 2015. 

 /s/ Darrell R. Atkinson

 Darrell R. Atkinson 

Case 5:13-cv-01946-BLF Document 304 Filed 09/17/15 Page 6 of 6