Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-19-05324/USCOURTS-caDC-19-05324-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 19-5324 September Term, 2019

1:19-cv-03170-UNA

Filed On: February 5, 2020

Surf Moore,

Appellant

v.

National Security Agency, (National

Intelligece Agency), et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Henderson and Katsas, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit 

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s October 31, 2019 order,

dismissing appellant’s complaint and civil action as frivolous, be affirmed. The district

court correctly concluded that appellant’s allegations are baseless and wholly

incredible. See, e.g., Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992) (district court

may dismiss as frivolous a complaint whose factual allegations “rise to the level of the

irrational or the wholly incredible”).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

USCA Case #19-5324 Document #1827080 Filed: 02/05/2020 Page 1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 19-5324 September Term, 2019

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2

USCA Case #19-5324 Document #1827080 Filed: 02/05/2020 Page 2 of 2