Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-02024/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-02024-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LAW

MEN LO PAR K

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIXTH STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

Counsel for all parties listed on the signature page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

RADWARE, LTD., an Israeli company;

RADWARE, INC., a New Jersey corporation,

Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants,

v.

F5 NETWORKS, INC., a Washington 

corporation,

Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff.

CASE NO. 5:13-cv-02024 RMW

(Related Case No. 5:13-cv-02021 RMW)

SIXTH STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2, 

[] ORDER, AND 

DECLARATION OF TERI H.P. 

NGUYEN IN SUPPORT THEREOF

Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

Location: Ctrm 6, 4

th Floor

(),/('

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 177 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MENLO PARK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIXTH STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Counter-Plaintiffs 

F5 Networks, Inc. (“F5”) and Counter-Defendants Radware Ltd. and Radware, Inc. (“Radware”), 

that the schedule controlling claim construction should be extended, subject to the approval of 

this Court in consideration of the following facts: 

WHEREAS, counsel for parties stipulated to extend claim construction briefing and the 

Court issued an Order Granting parties’ Fifth Stipulated Request for Order Enlarging Time 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 on February 23, 2015 (Dkt. No. 169); 

WHEREAS, Radware’s position is that its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and 

Preliminary Claim Constructions are, in part, contingent on F5’s response to certain interrogatory

requests; 

WHEREAS, counsel for F5 has requested an additional extension to respond to said 

interrogatory requests;

WHEREAS, the parties require additional time to comply with their respective claim 

construction obligations;

WHEREAS, the parties stipulate to continue further events in the claim construction 

proceedings in accordance with the chart infra; 

WHEREAS, the remaining dates are adjusted and recalculated for events that key off the 

date for service of Radware’s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, and the new currently proposed 

dates are summarized in the chart infra;

WHEREAS, the undersigned counsel met, conferred and agreed to change the dates as 

follows in order to explore resolution of the Counterclaims asserted against Radware and to 

explore resolution and prepare expert reports for the claims asserted against F5;

WHEREAS, stipulated extended dates reflected below will be subtracted from the 

calculation of dates currently on calendar so that the stipulated extended dates will not impact 

those remaining dates:

/ /

/ /

/ /

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 177 Filed 05/28/15 Page 2 of 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MENLO PARK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

SIXTH STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

Event Current Date New Date

Parties to exchange proposed Preliminary

claim constructions with identification of 

all references for support. PLR 4.2(a)(b)

April 1, 2015 June 1, 2015

Deadline to meet and confer to narrow the 

issues and finalize preparation of Joint 

Claim Construction and Prehearing 

Statement. PLR 4.2(c)

April 8, 2015 June 8, 2015

Joint Claim Construction Prehearing 

Statement due. PLR 4-3

April 16, 2015 June 16, 2015

Claim construction discovery closes. PLR 

4-4

May 20, 2015 July 20, 2015

Counter-Plaintiff to file and serve Opening 

Markman Brief with supporting evidence 

(including expert declarations) regarding 

claim construction. PLR 4-5(a)

Opening summary judgment briefs that 

relate to claim constructions also due

May 27, 2015 July 27, 2015

Counter-Defendants to file and serve 

Responsive Markman Brief with 

supporting evidence (including expert 

declarations) regarding claim construction. 

PLR 4-5(b)

Responsive summary judgment briefs due

June 11, 2015 August 11, 2015

Parties to file and serve Reply Markman 

Brief with supporting evidence (including 

expert declarations) regarding claim 

construction. PLR 4-5(c) 

Reply summary judgment briefs due

June 25, 2015 August 25, 2015

Technology Tutorial July 10, 2015 September 10, 2015

Markman Hearing

Summary Judgment Hearing

July 10, 2015 September 10, 2015

Markman Order TBD TBD

WHEREAS, no other dates for this case have been set by the Court.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED, AGREED AND ORDERED that the dates 

through Markman Hearing are as follows:

/ /

/ /

/ /

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 177 Filed 05/28/15 Page 3 of 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MENLO PARK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

SIXTH STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

Event New Date

Parties to exchange proposed Preliminary claim constructions with 

identification of all references for support. PLR 4.2(a)(b)

June 1, 2015

Deadline to meet and confer to narrow the issues and finalize 

preparation of Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement. 

PLR 4.2(c)

June 8, 2015

Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement due. PLR 4-3 June 16, 2015

Claim construction discovery closes. PLR 4-4 July 20, 2015

Counter-Plaintiff to file and serve Opening Markman Brief with 

supporting evidence (including expert declarations) regarding claim 

construction. PLR 4-5(a)

Opening summary judgment briefs that relate to claim constructions 

also due

July 27, 2015

Counter-Defendants to file and serve Responsive Markman Brief with 

supporting evidence (including expert declarations) regarding claim 

construction. PLR 4-5(b)

Responsive summary judgment briefs due

August 11, 2015

Parties to file and serve Reply Markman Brief with supporting 

evidence (including expert declarations) regarding claim construction. 

PLR 4-5(c) 

Reply summary judgment briefs due

August 25, 2015

Technology Tutorial September 10, 2015

Markman Hearing

Summary Judgment Hearing

September 10, 2015

Markman Order TBD

SO STIPULATED this 3

rd day of April 2015.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 177 Filed 05/28/15 Page 4 of 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MENLO PARK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 4 -

SIXTH STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

Dated: April 3, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

By:/s/ Teri H.P. Nguyen

Teri H.P. Nguyen

Fabio E. Marino (SBN 183825)

fmarino@mwe.com

Nitin Gambhir (SBN 259906)

ngambhir@mwe.com

Barrington Dyer (SBN 264762)

bdyer@mwe.com

Teri H.P. Nguyen (SBN 267498)

thpnguyen@mwe.com

Sruli Yellin (SBN 291431)

syellin@mwe.com

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100

Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004

Telephone: 650 815 7400

Facsimile: 650 815 7401

Counsel for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim 

Defendants Radware, Inc. and Radware, LTD.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 177 Filed 05/28/15 Page 5 of 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MENLO PARK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 5 -

SIXTH STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

Dated: April 3, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

PERKINS COIE LLP

By:/s/ Nathaniel E. Durrance

Nathaniel E. Durrance

Nathaniel E. Durrance (SBN 229210)

Ndurrance@perkinscoie.com

Ramsey M. Al-Salam (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Ralsalam@perkinscoie.com

Ryan J. McBrayer (Pro Hac Vice)

RMcBrayer@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

1201 Third Street, Ste. 4800

Seattle, WA 98101-3099

Telephone: 206-359-6385

Facsimile: 206-359-7385

Christopher Kao (SBN 237716)

CKao@perkinscoie.com

Perkins Coie LLP

3150 Porter Drive

Palo Alto, CA 94304

Telephone:650-838-4300

Facsimile: 650-838-4350

Counsel for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff F5 Networks, Inc.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 177 Filed 05/28/15 Page 6 of 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MENLO PARK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 6 -

SIXTH STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5.1, I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing 

of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a “conformed” 

signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence 

for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request.

Dated: April 3, 2015 /s/ Teri H.P. Nguyen

Teri H.P. Nguyen

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 177 Filed 05/28/15 Page 7 of 10
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LAW

MEN LO PAR K

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

[] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

By:

HON. RONALD M. WHYTE

Judge of the United States District Court

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 177 Filed 05/28/15 Page 8 of 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MENLO PARK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF TERI H.P. NGUYEN

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

DECLARATION OF TERI H.P. NGUYEN

I, Teri H.P. Nguyen, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney with the law firm of McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, counsel of 

record for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Radware, Ltd. and Radware, Inc. (collectively, 

“Radware”) in this action. I am admitted to practice law in the State of California. I have 

personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, and I could and would testify competently to those 

facts if called as a witness. 

2. Counsel for F5 and Radware counsel have met, conferred and agreed that, subject 

to the Court’s approval, the dates up through and including the Markman Hearing should be as 

follows:

Event New Date

Parties to exchange proposed Preliminary claim constructions with 

identification of all references for support. PLR 4.2(a)(b)

May 1, 2015

Deadline to meet and confer to narrow the issues and finalize 

preparation of Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement. 

PLR 4.2(c)

May 8, 2015

Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement due. PLR 4-3 May 16, 2015

Claim construction discovery closes. PLR 4-4 June 20, 2015

Counter-Plaintiff to file and serve Opening Markman Brief with 

supporting evidence (including expert declarations) regarding claim 

construction. PLR 4-5(a)

Opening summary judgment briefs that relate to claim constructions 

also due

June 27, 2015

Counter-Defendants to file and serve Responsive Markman Brief with 

supporting evidence (including expert declarations) regarding claim 

construction. PLR 4-5(b)

Responsive summary judgment briefs due

July 11, 2015

Parties to file and serve Reply Markman Brief with supporting 

evidence (including expert declarations) regarding claim construction. 

PLR 4-5(c) 

Reply summary judgment briefs due

July 25, 2015

Technology Tutorial August 10, 2015

Markman Hearing

Summary Judgment Hearing

August 10, 2015

Markman Order TBD

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 177 Filed 05/28/15 Page 9 of 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MENLO PARK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

DECLARATION OF TERI H.P. NGUYEN

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02024 RMW

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 3

rd day of April, 2015, in Menlo Park, California.

/s/ Teri H.P. Nguyen

Teri H.P. Nguyen

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 177 Filed 05/28/15 Page 10 of 10