Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_19-cv-00505/USCOURTS-azd-4_19-cv-00505-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Charles Bloeser, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Unknown Party, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-19-00505-TUC-DCB 

ORDER UNDER SEAL 

 On October 21, 2019, the Plaintiff, acting pro se, filed a Complaint and Request for 

Injunction, Application to Proceed without Prepaying Fees or Costs, and a Motion Pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(d), which provides for filings to be made under seal. The Court cannot 

read any of the documents because Plaintiff’s handwriting is illegible. The Court can only 

manage to read a word here and there. There is a strong public policy favoring access to 

court records, with judicial records sealed only for compelling reasons. Joy v. North, 692 

F.2d 880, 894 (2nd Cir. 1982)). The Court cannot read the motion to discern the reason why 

the case needs to be sealed and cannot read the Complaint. The Court will allow the 

Plaintiff leave to refile legible documents before ruling on the request to file the case under 

seal, request to proceed in forma pauperis, and before reviewing the Complaint, pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, to determine whether the case warrants service by the United States 

Marshal, pursuant to subsection d, or must be dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or because 

it fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to subsection e. Failure to 

file legible documents shall result in dismissal of the case. 

Case 4:19-cv-00505-DCB Document 7 Filed 10/29/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have 30 days to refile legible documents. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure to file legible documents shall result in 

this case being dismissed, without prejudice, without further notice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED to file this under seal, with distribution of this Order 

to Charles Bloeser. 

 Dated this 28th day of October, 2019. 

cc: Plaintiff 

Case 4:19-cv-00505-DCB Document 7 Filed 10/29/19 Page 2 of 2