Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00773/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00773-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 07cv0773 BTM(NLS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE A. BROOKS, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 07cv0773 BTM (NLS)

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE RULE 72(a)

vs. OBJECTIONS

MOTSENBOCKER ADVANCED

DEVELOPMENTS, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

Plaintiffs have filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s order of June 9, 2008.

However, Plaintiffs simultaneously filed a motion with the Magistrate Judge for

reconsideration of the June 9 order. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ Rule 72(a) objections are

premature and are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If the motion for reconsideration is

denied in whole or in part, Plaintiffs may file objections to the order on the motion for

reconsideration and the underlying June 9 order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 20, 2008

Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-00773-MMA-NLS Document 107 Filed 06/20/08 Page 1 of 1