Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01026/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01026-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 15-cv-1026-WHA Page 1 of 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JANET M. HEROLD

Regional Solicitor

SUSAN SELETSKY

Counsel for FLSA

ANDREW J. SCHULTZ (Cal. Bar # 237231)

NATALIE NARDECCHIA (Cal. Bar # 246486)

BENJAMIN R. BOTTS (Cal. Bar #274542)

Trial Attorneys

United States Department of Labor

Office of the Solicitor

90 Seventh Street, Suite 3-700

San Francisco, California 94103

Telephone: (415) 625-7767

Facsimile: (415) 625-7772

Email: botts.benjamin.r@dol.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Thomas E. Perez, Secretary

United States Department of Labor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, 

United States Department of Labor,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL CONSOLIDATED 

COURIERS, INC., a corporation, and 

TANWEER AHMED, an individual,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 3:15-cv-1026-WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION HEARING DATE

)

On June 9, 2015, at a court-ordered settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth 

Laporte, Plaintiff Secretary of Labor and Defendants National Consolidated Couriers, Inc. and Tanweer

Ahmed (collectively, “the parties”) agreed to a settlement in principle. The Secretary is currently 

Case 3:15-cv-01026-WHA Document 53 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 15-cv-1026-WHA Page 2 of 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

finalizing a proposed consent judgment to be exchanged with Defendants. Defendants consider the 

resolution of the pending contempt proceeding to be a material term of the settlement, and represent

that requiring Defendants to proceed with the contempt proceeding runs the risk of undermining the 

parties’ agreement. To allow adequate time to negotiate the language of the consent judgment, the 

parties hereby stipulate and jointly request that the Court continue the preliminary injunction hearing 

currently calendared for June 19, 2015 at 8:00 a.m. three weeks.

1

Agreed: 

/s/ Ronald Arena (as authorized 6/17/2015)

RONALD ARENA

ARENA HOFFMAN LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: June 17, 2015

M. PATRICIA SMITH

Solicitor of Labor

JANET M. HEROLD

Regional Solicitor

SUSAN SELETSKY

Counsel for FLSA

/s/ Benjamin Botts

BENJAMIN BOTTS

NATALIE NARDECCHIA

ANDREW SCHULTZ

Trial Attorneys

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: June 17, 2015

 1 The consent judgment and concurrently filed complaint will be a separate case, but the parties intend 

to file a joint administrative motion under Civ. L.R. 3-12 requesting that the Court treat the new case as 

related to the present matter. 

Case 3:15-cv-01026-WHA Document 53 Filed 06/17/15 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 15-cv-1026-WHA Page 3 of 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the preliminary injunction hearing calendared for June 19, 

2015 at 8:00 a.m. is continued until July ____, 2015 at ____ a.m. / p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8

June 17, 2015. 16

Case 3:15-cv-01026-WHA Document 53 Filed 06/17/15 Page 3 of 3