Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00970/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00970-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Steven G. Rosales 

Attorney at Law: 222224 

Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 

12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 

Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 

Tel.: (562)868-5886 

Fax: (562)868-5491 

E-mail _steven.rosales@rohlfinglaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff CHARLES V. MITCHELL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

CHARLES V. MITCHELL, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: 2:16-CV-00970 EFB 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

TO THE HONORABLE EDMUND F. BRENNAN, MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: 

Plaintiff Charles V. Mitchell (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), through their undersigned 

counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to extend 

the time for Plaintiff to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand 

to February 24, 2017; and that Defendant shall have until March 27, 2017, to file 

her opposition. Any reply by plaintiff will be due April 17, 2017. 

Case 2:16-cv-00970-EFB Document 19 Filed 01/27/17 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

A final extension of time for plaintiff is needed. As the Court is aware, 

Plaintiff’s Spouse recently passed away. Due to the press of the holidays and the 

need to find a caregiver and the required time to acclimate his children to his 

absence to meet his professional obligations, Counsel requires the additional time 

for Plaintiff to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand. 

Counsel sincerely apologizes to the court for any inconvenience this may 

have had upon it or its staff. 

DATE: January 25, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 

 /s/ Steven G. Rosales 

 BY: _________________________ Steven G. Rosales Attorney for plaintiff 

DATED: January 25, 2017 BENJAMIN WAGNER 

 United States Attorney 

 

 

 */S/- Michael K. Marriott 

 

_________________________________ 

 Michael K. Marriott 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 [*Via email authorization] 

 

Case 2:16-cv-00970-EFB Document 19 Filed 01/27/17 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff may have an extension of time, to 

and including February 24, 2017, in which to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment or Remand; Defendant may have an extension of time to March 27, 2017 

to file her opposition, if any is forthcoming. Any reply by plaintiff will be due 

April 17, 2017. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 26, 2017. 

 _______________________________________ 

THE HONORABLE EDMUND F. BRENNAN 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:16-cv-00970-EFB Document 19 Filed 01/27/17 Page 3 of 3