Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02212/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02212-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL C. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

METRO PCS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-02212-JD 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

The Court previously dismissed plaintiff’s complaint, and ordered him to file by July 8, 

2016, an amended complaint that clarifies the basis for the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction over 

this case. Dkt. No. 10. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, but instead filed a series of emails that had been printed out. Dkt. Nos. 11-13. 

Even construing the pro se plaintiff’s filings liberally, there is nothing in the filings that 

establishes federal subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff still has not identified any federal 

question, nor has he satisfied the bases for diversity jurisdiction. See Dkt. No. 11 at 1 (continuing 

to demand only $35,000).

The Court consequently dismisses this case and orders it closed. The dismissal is without 

prejudice. See In re Hall, Bayoutree Assocs., Ltd., 939 F.2d 802, 804 (9th Cir.1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2016

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-02212-JD Document 15 Filed 07/27/16 Page 1 of 1