Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00782/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00782-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 320
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assualt,Slander

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIRELL FRANCIS BETTIS, )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JOHN WALSH, AMERICA’S MOST )

WANTED, )

)

)

)

Defendants. )

 )

1:06cv0782 LJO DLB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR CITIZEN’S ARREST

(Document 30)

Plaintiff Kirell Francis Bettis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this diversity action. 

On March 19, 2007, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court order the United

States Marshal to arrest “each Deputy Sheriff that governs Module 3500 in the Mens Central Jail

of Los Angeles County” for failure to return Plaintiff’s legal documents. Pursuant to this Court’s

standard practice, the motion is construed as one seeking preliminary injunctive relief.

The purpose of a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status quo if the balance of

equities so heavily favors the moving party that justice requires the court to intervene to secure

the positions until the merits of the action are ultimately determined. University of Texas v.

Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 395 (1981). A preliminary injunction is available to a plaintiff who

“demonstrates either (1) a combination of probable success and the possibility of irreparable

harm, or (2) that serious questions are raised and the balance of hardship tips in its favor.”

Case 1:06-cv-00782-LJO-DLB Document 34 Filed 04/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Arcamuzi v. Continental Air Lines, Inc., 819 F. 2d 935, 937 (9th Cir. 1987). Under either

approach the plaintiff “must demonstrate a significant threat of irreparable injury.” Id. Also, an

injunction should not issue if the plaintiff “shows no chance of success on the merits.” Id. At a

bare minimum, the plaintiff “must demonstrate a fair chance of success of the merits, or

questions serious enough to require litigation.” Id.

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and as a preliminary matter, the court

must have before it an actual case or controversy. City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95,

102, 103 S.Ct. 1660, 1665 (1983); Valley Forge Christian Coll. v. Ams. United for Separation of

Church and State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464, 471, 102 S.Ct. 752, 757-58 (1982); Jones v. City of Los

Angeles, 444 F.3d 1118, 1126 (9th Cir. 2006). If the court does not have an actual case or

controversy before it, it has no power to hear the matter in question. Id. 

This action is proceeding against Defendants John Walsh and America’s Most Wanted

under this Court’s diversity jurisdiction for allegations of slander. Because an order relating to

materials to litigate this action would not remedy the claims upon which this action proceeds, the

Court lacks jurisdiction to issue the order sought by Plaintiff. 

Based on the foregoing, the court HEREBY RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s motion for

preliminary injunctive relief, filed March 19, 2007, be DENIED.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

thirty (30) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 10, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00782-LJO-DLB Document 34 Filed 04/11/07 Page 2 of 2