Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06165/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06165-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELDON BURROWS,

Plaintiff,

v.

C.M.O., J. KLARICH, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 04 6165 AWI NEW (DLB) P

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

APPROPRIATE AND FORWARDING

DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF 

 Eldon Burrows (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on August

246, 2004. 

The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and finds

that it states cognizable claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Dr. Klarich,

Dr. Neubarth and Dr. Ortiz for deliberate indifference to his medical needs in violation of the

Eighth Amendment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 512-15

(2002); Austin v. Terhune, 367 F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2004); Jackson v. Carey, 353 F.3d 750,

754 (9th Cir. 2003); Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara, 307 F.3d 1119, 1125-26 (9th Cir. 2002). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

DR. KLARICH

Case 1:04-cv-06165-AWI-GSA Document 38 Filed 03/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

DR. NEUBARTH

DR. ORTIZ

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff THREE USM-285 forms, THREE

summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT filed on APRIL 4, 2006. 

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall complete

the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed

Notice to the Court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. FOUR copies of the endorsed Second Amended Complaint filed on April

4, 2006. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 9, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06165-AWI-GSA Document 38 Filed 03/13/07 Page 2 of 2