Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04567/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04567-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION ADJOURNING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (Civ. L.R. 6-2(a))

1

516441 000078 16477255.1

Bruce J. Zabarauskas (Cal. Bar. No. 248601)

Thompson & Knight LLP

10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 950

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Telephone: (310) 203-6902

Facsimile: (310) 203-6980

Attorneys for Defendant

Southwest Airlines Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEAN SHREM, and MARNI FISCHER, 

individually and on behalf of others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-04567-HSG

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER ADJOURNING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

(Civ. L.R. 6-2(a))

WHEREAS, Jean Shrem and Marni Fischer (the “Plaintiffs”) commenced the abovecaptioned action on October 2, 2015;

WHEREAS, on November 12, 2015, Southwest Airlines Co. (the “Defendant”) filed a 

motion to dismiss (the “Motion To Dismiss”) the above-captioned action pursuant to Rule 12 of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

WHEREAS, a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for January 21, 2016;

WHEREAS, the initial case management conference (the “Case Management 

Conference”) in this action is currently scheduled for January 12, 2016;

Case 4:15-cv-04567-HSG Document 29 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION ADJOURNING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (Civ. L.R. 6-2(a))

2

516441 000078 16477255.1

WHEREAS, the parties believe that the interests of justice and judicial economy would 

best be served if the Case Management Conference is adjourned to a date which is after the 

hearing date on the Motion To Dismiss because: (i) if the Motion to Dismiss is granted, the Case 

Management Conference will be moot; and (ii) if the Motion to Dismiss is denied or only 

granted in part, the issues to be discussed at the Case Management Conference may be better 

framed;

WHEREAS, there have been no previous requests to adjourn the Case Management 

Conference;1

WHEREAS, the adjournment requested herein, will have no effect on the schedule for 

the case, other than to moving the deadline for the parties to file their joint case management 

report and ADR certification from one week before the existing date for the Case Management 

Conference to one week before the adjourned Case Management Conference date, and similarly 

moving any deadlines under Federal Rule 26 based upon the adjourned Case Management 

Conference date;

NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby stipulated by and between the undersigned parties that, 

subject to Court approval of this Stipulation, the Case Management Conference is adjourned 

from January 12, 2016 to February 9, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

Dated: December 11, 2015 

LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP.

By: /s/ Peter S. Fredman_______________ By: /s/ Bruce J. Zabarauskas__________

Peter B. Fredman Bruce J. Zabarauskas

Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for the Defendant

 1 Though a case management conference had been scheduled before prior to the case being assigned to Judge 

Gilliam, the notice for such conference was vacated upon the assignment of the case to Judge Gilliam. 

Case 4:15-cv-04567-HSG Document 29 Filed 12/15/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION ADJOURNING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (Civ. L.R. 6-2(a))

3

516441 000078 16477255.1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED

THIS 15th DAY OF DECEMBER 2015:

_________________________________________

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Case 4:15-cv-04567-HSG Document 29 Filed 12/15/15 Page 3 of 3