Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01474/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01474-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOUIS PEREZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

J. SAO, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:14-cv-01474 DLB PC

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH 

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A 

CLAIM

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT 

TO TERMINATE ACTION

Plaintiff Louis Perez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed this action on September 22, 2014.

1

 He names 

J. Sao, M.D., K. C. Lo, M.D., and D. Bergovskaya, M.D., as Defendants.

On July 17, 2015, the Court screened Plaintiff’s Complaint and found that it failed to 

state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint 

within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. Plaintiff was advised that failure to file 

an amended complaint would result in dismissal for failure to state a claim. Over thirty days 

passed and Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. On August 25, 2015, the Court issued 

an order directing Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to 

state a claim. Plaintiff was granted fourteen (14) days to respond to the order to show cause. 

Over fourteen days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to show cause or otherwise respond to 

 

1

Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge on October 1, 2014.

Case 1:14-cv-01474-DLB Document 10 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the Court’s order. Plaintiff was advised that failure to show cause or respond to the order would 

result in dismissal of the action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1) The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim; and

2) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2015 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01474-DLB Document 10 Filed 09/16/15 Page 2 of 2