Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05117/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05117-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY R. DRUMMONDS,

Plaintiff, CV F 03 5117 OWW WMW P 

vs. FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION

 RE MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE

 RELIEF (DOC 46, 54)

SGT. MILLER, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff has filed two motions for injunctive relief. Plaintiff’s motions refer to

conduct by correctional officials at Salinas Valley State Prison, where Plaintiff is housed. 

Plaintiff contends that officials have housed him with an incompatible cell-mate and that

they have interfered with his legal mail. Plaintiff also complains that the court is not timely

responding to his motions.

This case will proceed in the ordinary course of litigation. There are no defendants

in this action who are employed by the Department of Corrections at Salinas Valley State

Prison. The court must have personal jurisdiction over the parties to be enjoined; it may

not enjoin defendants not yet served or before the court. Zepeda v. Unites States I.N.S>,

753 F.2d 719, 727 (9 Cir. 1983). th

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s motions for

injunctive relief be denied.

Case 1:03-cv-05117-OWW -WMW Document 60 Filed 08/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9 Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the th

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05117-OWW -WMW Document 60 Filed 08/28/07 Page 2 of 2