Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-01230/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-01230-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

		

		
	

	

	

Stephen Gardner (pro hac vice) 

STANLEY LAW GROUP 

6116 N. Central Expy., Ste. 1500 

Dallas, Texas 75206 

Telephone: (214) 443-4300 

Facsimile: (214) 443-0358 

Email: steve@consumerhelper.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Martha Smith and Eleanor Tate 

Monty Agarwal 

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 

Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 

Telephone: (415) 471-3100 

Facsimile: (415) 471-3400 

Email: Monty.Agarwal@aporter.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Safeway Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MARTHA SMITH and ELEANOR 

TATE on behalf of themselves and 

all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

SAFEWAY INC., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 3:11-cv-01230-RS 

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) 

ORDER RESETTING HEARING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

Date: September 3, 2015 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Place: Courtroom 3, 17th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties respectfully submit this Stipulation and 

Proposed Order resetting the briefing deadlines and hearing date on Defendant Safeway 

Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 195, “Safeway Motion”). 

The current briefing schedule conflicts with vacations of two of Plaintiffs’ counsel. If 

the Court agrees with the proposed schedule, the parties also propose to reset the hearing 

by one week, to allow the Court time to review the completed briefing prior to the hearing. 

The Court should be aware that the new proposed schedule provides Defendant’s counsel 

Case 3:11-cv-01230-RS Document 197 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - 

 

		

		
	

	

	

an additional few days to reply, as compared to the regular briefing schedule, to 

accommodate one of Defendant’s counsel’s vacation plans in light of Plaintiff’s request to 

continue the schedule. The parties therefor propose the following schedule. 

Safeway Motion 

1. Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Safeway Motion is due by August 17, 2015. 

2. Safeway’s reply in support of its Motion is due by August 28, 2015. 

3. Hearing on the Safeway Motion set for September 10, 2015, subject to the 

Court’s availability. 

Respectfully submitted, 

STANLEY LAW GROUP ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 

By: /s/ Stephen Gardner 

Stephen Gardner 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Martha Smith and Eleanor Tate 

By: /s/ Monty Agarwal 

Monty Agarwal 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Safeway, Inc. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Hearing on the Safeway Motion will be held at 1:30 p.m. on , 2015. 

Dated: 

 

 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

September 10

7/27/15

Case 3:11-cv-01230-RS Document 197 Filed 07/27/15 Page 2 of 2