Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-02549/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-02549-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 12-CV-02549-WHA (NJV)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JOHN DUGAN, AURORA DUGAN, 

MATTHEW TAPSCOTT, RIKA OLSON, 

JASON RAY, each individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LLOYDS TSB BANK, PLC, a bank organized and 

existing under the laws of the United Kingdom, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 12-cv-02549-WHA (NJV)

Consolidated with: 

Case No. 12-cv-02937-WHA (NJV) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING 

DECEMBER 23, 2013 ORDER 

DAVID OSMENA and PATRICIA HOGAN 

OSMENA each individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

LLOYDS TSB BANK, PLC, a bank organized and 

existing under the laws of the United Kingdom, 

 Defendant. 

Case 3:12-cv-02549-WHA Document 395 Filed 01/03/14 Page 1 of 2
1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 12-CV-02549-WHA (NJV)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On December 31, 2013, the parties appeared before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For 

Administrative Relief (Dkt. # 373) in which Lloyds TSB Bank plc (now known as Lloyds Bank plc) 

(“LTSB)” sought to discuss modification of this Court’s December 23, 2013 Order Granting Motion to 

Compel In Part re: Dkt. # 328. The Court heard argument of both parties and finds good cause to 

modify the December 23, 2013 Order. 

 It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall select no more than 1,000 entries from LTSB’s 

privilege log to be supplemented by LTSB in the manner set forth in the December 23, 2013 Order. 

Plaintiffs shall identify the 1,000 entries for LTSB no later than January 3, 2014 and shall include 

among the 1,000 entries the entries specifically challenged in Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel (Dkt. #328) 

as well as entries identified by LTSB by January 2, 2014. LTSB shall complete its supplementation no 

later than January 13, 2014. The declaration of attorneys Sullivan and/or Hocevar described at page 5:7-

10 of the December 23, 2013 Order shall not be required at this time. If the parties are unable to resolve 

any further disputes regarding the privilege log, the Court shall require the parties to appear in person for 

a court-guided meet and confer. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:____________________ By: 

 

THE HONORABLE NANDOR J. VADAS 

United States Magistrate Judge 

January 3, 2014

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Nandor J. Vadas

Case 3:12-cv-02549-WHA Document 395 Filed 01/03/14 Page 2 of 2