Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02629/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02629-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RIMANPREET UPPAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

CVS PHARMACY, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-02629-VC 

ORDER REGARDING JOINT 

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

Re: Dkt. No. 28

In their joint supplemental brief, the parties should also address the following question: If 

it is appropriate for the class members to recover less than 100% of their overtime claims, why 

shouldn't any remaining money from uncashed checks be redistributed pro rata to the class 

members who do cash their checks up to the amount of actual damages, before any unclaimed 

funds are distributed to a cy pres beneficiary?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 20, 2015

______________________________________

 VINCE CHHABRIA

 United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-02629-VC Document 30 Filed 08/20/15 Page 1 of 1