Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01119/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01119-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEW LINE PRODUCTIONS, INC., 

et al., 

Plaintiff,

v.

PAULA DIXON, 

Defendant.

 /

1:06-cv-01119-OWW-SMS 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION RE: PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

(Doc. 12)

Plaintiffs are proceeding with a civil action in this Court.

The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72-302(c)(19) and 72-303.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for default

judgment against Defendant Paula Dixon, filed December 14, 2006,

including the application, a memorandum of law, declarations, and

a proposed order.

On February 27, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and Recommendation that Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment

against Defendant Paula Dixon be granted. The Findings and

Recommendation were served on all parties and contained notice

Case 1:06-cv-01119-OWW -SMS Document 19 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be

filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that

order. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed February 27,

2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment against

Defendant Paula Dixon is GRANTED;

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of

Plaintiffs and against Defendant Paula Dixon in the amount

of $6,000.00 in statutory damages, $732.19 in attorney’s fees,

and $453.58 in costs; and,

4. The Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of

Plaintiffs and against Defendant Paula Dixon enjoining

Defendant from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiffs’

rights in the copyrighted motion pictures and any copyrighted

motion picture, whether now in existence or later created, which

is owned or controlled by Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs’ motion

pictures”), including without limitation by using the Internet or

any online media distribution system to reproduce (i.e.,

download) or copy any of Plaintiffs’ motion pictures, to

Case 1:06-cv-01119-OWW -SMS Document 19 Filed 04/30/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

distribute (i.e., upload) any of Plaintiffs’ motion pictures, or

to make any of Plaintiffs’ motion pictures available for

distribution to the public, except pursuant to a lawful license

or with the express authority of Plaintiffs; and, Defendant shall

also destroy all copies of Plaintiffs’ motion pictures that

Defendant has downloaded onto any computer hard drive or server

without Plaintiffs’ authorization, and shall destroy all copies

of those downloaded motion pictures transferred onto any physical

medium or device in Defendant’s possession, custody, or control.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01119-OWW -SMS Document 19 Filed 04/30/07 Page 3 of 3