Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00758/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00758-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

Chapman v. Valero California Retail Company, et al., Case No. 1:10-cv-00758-LJO-GSA

Plaintiff’s Request to Continue the Scheduling Conference 

Page 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Byron Chapman, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Valero California Retail Company 

dba Valero Corner Store #3006, et 

al., 

 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 1:10-cv-00758-LJO-GSA 

Plaintiff’s Request to Continue the 

Scheduling Conference and Order 

Thereon 

Date: August 5, 2010 

Time: 9:30 a.m. 

Ctrm: 10, 6th Floor 

 

Lynn Hubbard, III, SBN 69773

Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV, SBN 212970

DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC

12 Williamsburg Lane 

Chico, CA 95926 

Telephone: (530) 895-3252 

Facsimile: (530) 894-8244 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:10-cv-00758-LJO-GSA Document 8 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 2
Chapman v. Valero California Retail Company, et al., Case No. 1:10-cv-00758-LJO-GSA

Plaintiff’s Request to Continue the Scheduling Conference 

Page 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff hereby requests that the date for the Scheduling Conference, 

currently scheduled for August 5, 2010, be continued to September 8, 2010, 

or in the alternative, a date convenient for the court. Plaintiff makes this 

request based on the fact that defendant, Valero California Retail Company 

dba Valero Corner Store #3006 (“Valero”), was served on July 21, 2010, but 

has not yet appeared. Defendant Valero’s answer to the complaint is due on 

or before August 11, 2010. Additionally, upon receipt of a letter from counsel 

for Valero, Plaintiff anticipates voluntarily dismissing the Pierucci defendants. 

If the Scheduling Conference is continued, it would allow plaintiff and 

defendant time to properly meet and confer concerning the Joint Scheduling 

Report by August 20, 2010, and subsequently file the Joint Scheduling Report 

by September 2, 2010. 

Therefore, plaintiff respectively submits that it would be counter 

productive to file a status report or hold a status conference at this time. 

Dated: July 26, 2010 DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC 

 /s/ Lynn Hubbard III 

 LYNN HUBBARD III 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 

ORDER 

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

that the scheduling conference be continued to September 8, 2010 at 9:30 

a.m. with the Joint Scheduling Report to be filed seven (7) days prior to the 

conference. 

Dated: _July 27, 2010 _/s/ GARY S. AUSTIN_____________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:10-cv-00758-LJO-GSA Document 8 Filed 07/27/10 Page 2 of 2