Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-02068/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-02068-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Alberto Villescas is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to the 

jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 34; Local Rule 302.

Plaintiff claims that staff have interfered with his attempt to mail an opposition to Defendants’ 

pending motion for summary judgment and requests the Court take “notice of staff interference with 

protected conduct ...” (ECF No. 64.) 

Based on the nature and content of his filing, the Court cannot and will not take “notice” of 

staff interference with his attempt to mail certain documents with the Court because there is not 

sufficient evidence presented to support such a finding. Plaintiff is advised that on October 27, 2015, 

the Court granted his second request for an extension of time to file an opposition and the current 

deadline is November 26, 2015. (ECF No. 63.) Thus, at this juncture, there is no prejudice to Plaintiff 

based on any of the alleged interference with his mail by prison staff members.

ALBERTO VILLESCAS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

M.T. DOTSON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-02068-SAB (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

[ECF No. 64]

Case 1:12-cv-02068-SAB Document 66 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the record is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 5, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-02068-SAB Document 66 Filed 11/05/15 Page 2 of 2