Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01359/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01359-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLYDE M. TATE, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

CALIFORNIA STATE OF, )

)

Respondent. )

)

)

___________________________________ )

1:06-cv-01359-AWI WMW HC

SECOND ORDER REQUIRING

FILING OF AMENDED

PETITION WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 11, 2007, the court entered an order explaining to Petitioner that he had

failed to name the correct respondent and that Petitioner’s petition is defective because it

lacks page five. The court therefore issued the following order

Accordingly, Petitioner is HEREBY GRANTED thirty days from the date of

this order to file a first amended petition, containing all the required pages and

naming the correct respondent. Petitioner’s failure to do so will result in 

Case 1:06-cv-01359-AWI-WMW Document 11 Filed 02/07/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

recommendations that this action be dismissed. 

In response to the court’s order, Petitioner filed two pages: a new cover page naming

the correct respondent and a copy of page 5 of his petition. In doing so, Petitioner failed to

comply with this court’s order requiring him to file “a first amended petition, containing all

the required pages.” All of the required pages in a petition for writ of habeas corpus refers to

the entire form. Petitioner’s petition must necessarily be comprised of more than the two

pages he identifies as his amended petition, and the court must have one complete petition to

review. It is possible that Petitioner did not understand the court’s order. Therefore,

Petitioner will be granted one additional opportunity to comply with the order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

Petitioner SHALL FILE, within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, a second

amended petition which is complete within itself. It must contain ALL of the correct pages

of the Petitioner’s petition. Petitioner’s failure to file such a self-contained, complete second

amended petition will result in the dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 7, 2008 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

bl0dc4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01359-AWI-WMW Document 11 Filed 02/07/08 Page 2 of 2