Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05709/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05709-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

C 03-5709 JF (HRL)

See Counsel List on Next Page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

RENESAS TECHNOLOGY CORP.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORP., and

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,

USA,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C 03-5709 JF (HRL)

JOIINT STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORP., and

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,

USA,

Counterclaim Plaintiffs,

vs.

RENESAS TECHNOLOGY CORP.,

Counterclaim Defendant.

**E-filed 3/31/06**

Case 5:03-cv-05709-JF Document 200 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

C 03-5709 JF (HRL)

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP

Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) (victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com)

R. Tulloss Delk (Bar No. 229442) (tullossdelk@quinnemanuel.com)

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560

Redwood City, CA 94065

Telephone: (650) 801-5000

Facsimile: (650) 801-5100

JENNER & BLOCK LLP

Donald R. Harris (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) (dharris@jenner.com)

Terrence J. Truax (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) (ttruax@jenner.com)

Reginald J. Hill (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) (rhill@jenner.com)

Stephen M. Geissler (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) (sgeissler@jenner.com)

Joseph A. Saltiel (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) (jsaltiel@jenner.com)

One IBM Plaza

Chicago, IL 60611

Telephone: (312) 222-9350

Facsimile: (312) 527-0484

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant

Renesas Technology Corp.

ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

William L. Anthony, Jr. (State Bar No. 71910) (wanthony@orrick.com)

Craig R. Kaufman (State Bar No. 159458) (ckaufman@orrick.com)

Kai Tseng (State Bar No. 193756) (ktseng@orrick.com)

Rowena Young (State Bar No. 196317)(ryoung@orrick.com)

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 614-7400

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs

Nanya Technology Corp. and

Nanya Technology Corporation, USA

Case 5:03-cv-05709-JF Document 200 Filed 03/31/06 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

C 03-5709 JF (HRL)

The parties through their respective counsel hereby stipulate as follows:

1. This Court held a case management conference on March 10, 2006 to

discuss supplemental claim construction briefing in the present case. As a result of the hearing,

the Court entered an order vacating the original dates for the Markman hearing and tutorial and

setting new dates. The Court also entered a schedule for supplemental claim construction

briefing. Dates for the supplemental briefing schedule were not discussed at the case

management conference.

2. According to the schedule entered by the Court on March 16, 2006,

opening briefs are due March 31, 2006, oppositions are due by April 14, 2006, and replies are due

by April 21, 2006. The Court scheduled the tutorial and subsequent Markman hearing for May

17 and 18, 2006.

3. Immediately after the case management conference, attorneys for Plaintiff

Renesas Technology Corp. (“Renesas”) and Defendant Nanya Technology Corp. and Nanya

Technology Corp. USA (collectively “Nanya”) met and conferred to discuss a schedule for the

supplemental claim construction briefing requested by the Court during the case management

conference. The parties agreed that Renesas’ supplemental opening brief would be due by April

7, 2006, Nanya’s supplemental brief would be due by April 21, 2006, and that Renesas’ reply

would be due by April 28, 2006.

4. After receiving the Court’s March 16, 2006 Minute Order, the parties again

conferred regarding the schedule for supplemental claim construction briefing and, after

considering the time needed to finalize a Supplemental Joint Claim Construction Statement and

then complete briefing, the parties believe that, if acceptable to the Court, the schedule to which

the parties originally agreed -- April 7 for Supplemental Opening Brief; April 21 for

Supplemental Response Brief; and April 28 for Supplemental Reply Brief -- would be preferable

and still allow nearly three weeks prior to the claim construction hearing scheduled for May 17

and 18, 2006.

Case 5:03-cv-05709-JF Document 200 Filed 03/31/06 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

C 03-5709 JF (HRL)

5. Accordingly Renesas and Nanya respectfully request the entry by the Court

of the attached Proposed Order revising the schedule for supplemental claim construction

briefing. The dates for the tutorial and Markman hearing remain unchanged.

Dated: March 29, 2005 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER &

HEDGES, LLP

JENNER & BLOCK LLP

By: /s/

Terrence J. Truax

Attorney for Plaintiff Renesas Technology Corp.

Dated: March 29, 2005 ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

By: /s/ Craig Kaufman

Craig Kaufman

Attorney for Defendants Nanya Technology

Corp. and Nanya Technology Corp. USA

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled document.

Case 5:03-cv-05709-JF Document 200 Filed 03/31/06 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

C 03-5709 JF (HRL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having considered the prior agreement by the parties regarding the

supplemental claim construction briefing schedule, hereby vacates the briefing schedule set forth

in its March 16, 2006 Minute Order and sets the following schedule for the supplemental claim

construction briefing:

Renesas’ supplemental opening brief shall be due by April 7, 2006;

Nanya’s supplemental response brief shall be due by April 21, 2006; and

Renesas’ supplemental reply brief shall be due by April 28, 2006.

All other dates in the March 16, 2006 Minute Order remain unchanged.

Dated: __________________

Honorable Jeremy F. Fogel

United States District Judge

3/31/06

Case 5:03-cv-05709-JF Document 200 Filed 03/31/06 Page 5 of 5