Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00738/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00738-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

NICOLE MOSS

and DISABILITY RIGHTS, 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION, 

SERVICES: HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NICOLE MOSS, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TAQUERIA CANCUN; GEE TEE O

L.L.C., a limited liability company, JAMES

HONG KIM, NANCY OK KIM,

Defendants. ___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-0738 HRL 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Mutual Settlement Agreement and Release (“Agreement”) herein, each party is to bear its own

costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511

U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of

settlement agreements).

*ORDER E-FILED 2/27/2008* XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX

Case 5:05-cv-00738-HRL Document 76 Filed 02/27/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through

their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: February 26, 2008 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: ________/s/___________________

Thomas E. Frankovich

Attorneys for Plaintiffs NICOLE MOSS and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

Dated: February 17, 2008 NEWMAN, MARCUS & CLARENBACH, LLP

By: /s/ 

Edward W. Newman

Attorney for Defendants JAMES HONG KIM and

NANCY OK KIM

Dated: February 13, 2008 FITZPATRICK, SPINI & SWANSTON

By: /s/ 

David S. Spini

Attorneys for Defendant GEE TEE O L.L.C.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

XXXXXXXX

Case 5:05-cv-00738-HRL Document 76 Filed 02/27/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 3

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Mutual Settlement Agreement and Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

DATED: ______________, 2008

______________________________________

Hon. Howard R. Lloyd 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

February 27 , Magistrate Judge XXXXXXX

Case 5:05-cv-00738-HRL Document 76 Filed 02/27/08 Page 3 of 3