Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_00-cv-06226/USCOURTS-caed-1_00-cv-06226-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENITO MORALES,

Plaintiff, CV F 00 6226 OWW WMW P

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

CAL TERHUNE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

On February 22, 2005, the court recommended dismissal of this action for failure

to prosecute. On February 23, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file an

amended complaint. On April 22, 2005, plaintiff requested a further extension of time to file an

amended complaint. On May 4, 2005, plaintiff was granted an extension of time to file an

amended complaint. Plaintiff has not done so. Because there is no operative pleading, this case

should be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Accordinly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED

that this action be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

thirty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file

written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be

Case 1:00-cv-06226-OWW -WMW Document 60 Filed 06/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the

objections shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties

are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives all objections to the

judge’s findings of fact. See Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). Failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2005 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:00-cv-06226-OWW -WMW Document 60 Filed 06/15/05 Page 2 of 2