Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02225/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02225-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES WHITTENBERG,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2225 GEB EFB P

vs.

V. BORTOLAMEDI, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed a document entitled “response to interrogatories and request for

production of documents.” Plaintiff is informed that court permission is not necessary for

discovery requests and that neither discovery requests served on an opposing party nor that

party's responses should be filed until such time as a party becomes dissatisfied with a response

and seeks relief from the court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery

requests between the parties shall not be filed with the court unless, and until, they are at issue. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s October 30, 2006

response to interrogatories and request for production of documents will be placed in the court

file and disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses,

////

Case 2:04-cv-02225-GEB-EFB Document 39 Filed 11/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

except as required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited

to, a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

DATED: November 15, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-02225-GEB-EFB Document 39 Filed 11/15/06 Page 2 of 2