Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-md-01819/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-md-01819-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

WASHINGTON

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JT STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFS’ ADMIN MTN TO SUBMIT SUPPL BRIEF

CASE NO. M:07-CV-01819-CW 

MDL NO. 1819 

CRAIG P. SEEBALD (pro hac vice)

cseebald@mwe.com 

PAMELA J. MARPLE (pro hac vice)

pmarple@mwe.com 

VINCENT C. VAN PANHUYS (pro hac vice) 

vvanpanhuys@mwe.com 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

600 Thirteenth Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005-3096 

Telephone: 202.756.8000 

Facsimile: 202.756.8087 

DANIEL E. ALBERTI (68620) 

dalberti@mwe.com 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: 650.813.5000 

Facsimile: 650.813.5100 

Attorneys for Defendants 

RENESAS TECHNOLOGY CORP., 

RENESAS TECHNOLOGY AMERICA, INC., 

HITACHI, LTD. AND HITACHI AMERICA, LTD. 

[ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS AND COUNSEL 

LISTED ON FINAL PAGE] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

IN RE STATIC RANDOM ACCESS 

MEMORY (SRAM) ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION 

___________________________________ 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS 

Case No. M:07-CV-01819-CW 

MDL No. 1819 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF 

EXPLAINING RELEVANCE OF THE GPU

ORDER TO DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO DIRECT PURCHASER 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS 

CERTIFICATION AND TO ALLOW 

PLAINTIFFS TWO PAGE TO RESPOND 

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 512 Filed 08/05/08 Page 1 of 4
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JT STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFS’ ADMIN MTN TO SUBMIT SUPPL BRIEF - 2 - CASE NO. M:07-CV-01819-CW 

MDL NO. 1819 

 WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 7-11 permits a party to file an administrative motion with 

respect to miscellaneous administrative matters, not otherwise governed by federal statute, 

Federal or local rule or standing order of the assigned judge. 

 WHEREAS, Defendants seek to submit a brief of no more than two pages explaining the 

relevance of Honorable William H. Alsup’s Order Certifying Limited Direct-Purchaser Class and 

Denying Indirect Purchaser in In Re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 

1826 (N.D. Cal. July 18, 2008) (“GPU Order”), to Defendants’ Opposition to Direct Purchaser 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (“Opposition”). 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff requests two additional pages to respond to Defendants 

supplemental memorandum. 

 WHEREAS, the GPU Order was filed four days after Defendants filed their Opposition. 

Consequently, Defendants did not have an opportunity to explain the relevance of the GPU 

Order. 

 NOW THEREFORE, DEFENDANTS AND PLAINTIFFS, THROUGH THEIR 

RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE to the Court entering the attached Proposed 

Order. 

July 31, 2008 Respectfully Submitted, 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

By: /s/ Daniel E. Alberti 

 Daniel E. Alberti 

Attorneys for Defendants 

RENESAS TECHNOLOGY CORP., 

RENESAS TECHNOLOGY AMERICA, INC., 

HITACHI, LTD. AND HITACHI AMERICA, 

LTD.

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 512 Filed 08/05/08 Page 2 of 4
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JT STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFS’ ADMIN MTN TO SUBMIT SUPPL BRIEF - 3 - CASE NO. M:07-CV-01819-CW 

MDL NO. 1819 

July 31, 2008 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY

By: /s/Steven N. Williams 

 Steven N. Williams 

Class Counsel for 

DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 512 Filed 08/05/08 Page 3 of 4
MCDERMOTT 

WILL 

& EMERY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JT STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFS’ ADMIN MTN TO SUBMIT SUPPL BRIEF - 4 - CASE NO. M:07-CV-01819-CW 

MDL NO. 1819 

ORDER

Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing the Court hereby ORDERS: 

 1. Defendants’ may submit a supplemental brief of no more than two pages 

explaining the relevance of Honorable William H. Alsup’s Order Certifying Limited DirectPurchaser Class and Denying Indirect Purchaser in In Re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust 

Litigation, MDL No. 1826, Case No. C. 06-07417 WHA (N.D. Cal. July 18, 2008). 

 2. Plaintiff may submit two pages in response to Defendants’ supplemenatl brief – in 

either its Reply in Support of Class Certification, or in a separate supplemental brief. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 8/4/08 

Dated: The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Court Judge 

WDC99 1598632-3.017575.0722 

Case 4:07-md-01819-CW Document 512 Filed 08/05/08 Page 4 of 4