Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00992/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00992-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on October 14, 2005, as 1

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Out to Court. However, plaintiff has not

notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODNEY WILLIAM BAILEY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF

OHIO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00992-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 7)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff Rodney William Bailey (“plaintiff”) is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On September 16, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:05-cv-00992-OWW -LJO Document 12 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 16,

2005, is ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED without leave to amend.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00992-OWW -LJO Document 12 Filed 11/01/05 Page 2 of 2