Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05447/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05447-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on October 28, 2005, as

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Not in Custody. However, plaintiff has not

notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully

effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACK WALDROP,

Plaintiff,

vs.

U.M.C., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05447-AWI-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 1)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Jack Waldrop (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On October 14, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within fifteen (15) days. To

date, plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:04-cv-05447-AWI-LJO Document 19 Filed 12/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed October 14,

2005, are ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on

plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 5, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05447-AWI-LJO Document 19 Filed 12/06/05 Page 2 of 2