Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01983/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01983-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

---

1 Jill P. Telfer, Esq. (State Bar No. 145450) 

LAW OFFICES OF JILL P. TELFER 

2 A Professional Corporation

331 J Street, Suite 200 

3 Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 446-1916 

4 Facsimile: (916) 446-1726 

Email: jtelfer@telferlaw.com 

5 

6 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Petitioner 

KARIN BJORK

7 

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 

KARIN BJORK,

11 

Plaintiff,

12 vs.

13 COUNTY OF PLACER THE DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, and DOES 1

14 through 10, inclusive,

15 Defendant. 

) LEAD CASE NO. 2:14-CV-01983-MCE-EFB

) CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01616-MCE-EFB 

) 

) 

) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE

) ORDER

) 

) 

) 

 ) 

16 ) Date: November 18, 2015 Time: 10:00 a.m. 

KARIN BJORK,

17 

Plaintiff,

18 vs.

19 COUNTY OF PLACER THE DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, and DOES 1

20 through 10, inclusive,

21 Defendant. 

) Courtroom: 8, Third Floor 

) Magistrate Judge: Hon. Edmund F. Brennan 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 ) 

22 

23 

Plaintiff Karin Bjork moved this Court for a Protective Order to Defendant County of 

24 

Placer’s Request for Admissions, Set Three, which included Requests for Admission No. 133 

25 

26 through 435, on the basis the volume was unduly burdensome. In addition, the Plaintiff contended 

27 the requests were objectionable being argumentative, vague, ambiguous and cumulative. 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1 

Case 2:14-cv-01983-MCE-EFB Document 38 Filed 12/07/15 Page 1 of 2
1 On November 18, 2015, the Court having considered the papers on request, the Joint 

2 Statement of the parties, oral argument made by counsel for each party, and good cause appearing 

3 

therefor, 

4 

5 IT IS ORDERED that the request be and is hereby GRANTED. Defendant is permitted to 

6 propound ten additional Request for Admissions in this matter with the guidance provided by the 

7 Court at the hearing. 

8 

Dated: December 7,2 015. 

9

10 EDMUND F. BRENNAN

MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case 2:14-cv-01983-MCE-EFB Document 38 Filed 12/07/15 Page 2 of 2