Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01050/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01050-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALVIS VERNON RHODES, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

STANISLAUS COUNTY SUPERIOR )

COURT, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-cv-01050-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 3, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a

Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DISMISSED without prejudice. These Findings and Recommendation

were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections

were to be filed within fifteen (15) days from the date of service

of that order. On August 13, 2007 and August 28, 2007,

respectively, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendation.

//

Case 1:07-cv-01050-OWW -DLB Document 9 Filed 09/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendation are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed August 3, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED

without prejudice; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment for Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 25, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01050-OWW -DLB Document 9 Filed 09/26/07 Page 2 of 2