Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01601/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01601-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO SHORTEN TIME RE SUNRISE’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL 

Case No. 04-01601 FMS 

Eric L. Wesenberg (State Bar No. 139696) 

Michael F. Heafey (State Bar No. 153499) 

Sanjeet Dutta (State Bar No. 203463) 

Theresa A. Sutton (State Bar No. 211857) 

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, California 94205 

Telephone: (650) 614-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter 

Defendant

SUNRISE TELECOM INCORPORATED 

John P. Bovich (State Bar No 150688) 

Kerry Hopkins (State Bar No 219406) 

REED SMITH LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111-3922 

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 7936 

San Francisco, California 94120-7936 

Telephone: (415) 543-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 391-8269 

Eugene LeDonne (admitted pro hac vice)

Stephen M. Chin (admitted pro hac vice)

REED SMITH LLP 

599 Lexington Avenue 

New York, New York 10022 

Telephone: (212) 521-5400 

Facsimile: (212) 521-5450 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

ACTERNA LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SUNRISE TELECOM INCORPORATED, a 

Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff,

v.

ACTERNA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability 

company, 

Defendant.

Case No. 04-01601 FMS 

AMENDED STIPULATION OF THE 

PARTIES TO SHORTEN TIME ON 

WHICH SUNRISE’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL PRODUCTION OF 

DOCUMENTS MAY BE HEARD 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM 

AND ORDER

Case 3:04-cv-01601-WWS Document 103 Filed 05/06/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 

STIPULATION TO SHORTEN TIME RE SUNRISE’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL 

Case No. 04-01601 FMS 

Sunrise and Acterna submit this Stipulation, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 and 

7-12, regarding the shortening of time on which Sunrise’s Motion to Compel may be heard. The 

Parties ask the Court to approve the Stipulation. 

1. Sunrise filed and served its Motion to Compel on May 5, 2005. It is set for 

hearing on June 14, 2005. 

2. Sunrise and Acterna have met and conferred regarding Sunrise’s request to 

shorten the time on which the Motion to Compel may be heard. 

3. Acterna has agreed to stipulate to an order shortening time on which 

Sunrise’s Motion to Compel may be heard. 

4. Acterna’s agreement to stipulate shall not be construed as an admission that 

Acterna agrees with any of Sunrise’s contentions. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby AGREE AND STIPULATE and request 

that the Court a) vacate the June 14, 2005, hearing date and b) order that Sunrise’s Motion to 

Compel be heard on June 7, 2005, with the following briefing schedule: 

May 19, 2005 Defendant/Counterclaimant Acterna, LLC’s Opposition to 

Sunrise’s Motion to Compel is due. 

May 24, 2005 Sunrise’s Reply in support of its Motion to Compel is due. 

Dated: May 6, 2005 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

By _____/s/________ 

Sanjeet K. Dutta 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

Sunrise Telecom Incorporated 

Dated: May 6, 2005 REED SMITH LLP 

By _____/s/_________ 

John P. Bovich 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

Acterna, LLC 

Case 3:04-cv-01601-WWS Document 103 Filed 05/06/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 - 

STIPULATION TO SHORTEN TIME RE SUNRISE’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL 

Case No. 04-01601 FMS 

ORDER

The hearing date of June 14, 2005 for Sunrise’s Motion to Compel is vacated, and the new 

hearing date for this Motion is May 31, 2005. The briefing schedule is modified as follows: 

May 17, 2005 Defendant/Counterclaimant Acterna, LLC’s Opposition to 

Sunrise’s Motion to Compel is due. 

May 20, 2005 Sunrise’s Reply in support of its Motion to Compel is due. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________ 

The Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte 

United States District Judge 

DOCSSV1:406226.1

June 7, 2005 at 9 a.m.

^

May 19, 2005

May 24, 2005

Magistrate

^

May 6, 2005

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:04-cv-01601-WWS Document 103 Filed 05/06/05 Page 3 of 3