Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01794/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01794-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Saul Barrios Perez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s 

claims against Defendants Dill, Harden, Sobbe, Sandoval, Tyson, Chan, and Brown for conditions of 

confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment. As of September 29, 2015, all parties have 

consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. (Plaintiff’s consent, ECF No. 109; Defendants’ 

consent, ECF No. 110). This matter is set for a telephonic trial confirmation hearing on November 18, 

2015, and a jury trial on February 9, 2016.

On October 7, 2015, the Court issued an Amended Second Scheduling Order directing Plaintiff 

to file his pretrial statement on or before October 19, 2015. To date, two weeks after the due date,

Plaintiff has failed to comply with the order. Defendants have noted that Plaintiff’s failure to comply 

SAUL BARRIOS PEREZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DILL, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:07-cv-01794-BAM (PC)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE 

TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER AND 

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(ECF No. 112)

Show Cause Hearing: November 18, 2015 at 10:00 

a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM)

Case 1:07-cv-01794-BAM Document 115 Filed 11/03/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

with the order requiring him to file a pretrial statement has now prejudiced them in their own pretrial 

statement preparations. (ECF No. 113.) 

Accordingly, Plaintiff shall show cause by WRITTEN response on or before November 13, 

2015 to this Order To Show Cause why this action should not be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure 

to obey the Court’s order and for failure to prosecute. Whether the hearing on November 18, 2015, at

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM) and/or the trial will go forward as scheduled will depend on 

Plaintiff’s response, if any. If the response does not show GOOD CAUSE, the matter will be

dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 2, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01794-BAM Document 115 Filed 11/03/15 Page 2 of 2