Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04972/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04972-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

DENNIS J. HERMAN (220163) 

DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM (248631) 

100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415/288-4545 

415/288-4534 (fax) 

dherman@csgrr.com 

dpfefferbaum@csgrr.com 

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

JERRY TWINDE, On Behalf of Himself and 

All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 

et al., 

Defendants. 

RAYNOLD L. GILBERT, On Behalf of 

Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 

et al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 4:07-cv-04972-CW 

CLASS ACTION

No. 4:07-cv-04971-CW 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT FOR BRIEFING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW Document 30 Filed 04/18/08 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR 

BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS - 4:07-cv-04972-CW -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, lead plaintiff filed his Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint for 

Violation of the Federal Securities Laws in this action on January 15, 2008, and defendants filed a 

Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violation of the Federal 

Securities Laws (“Motion to Dismiss”) on March 7, 2008; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, lead plaintiff is to have 25 pages to respond to 

defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, due April 21, 2008, and defendants are to have 15 pages to reply, due 

May 29, 2008; 

WHEREAS, lead plaintiff believes that because of the number and complexity of the issues 

raised in defendants’ 25-page Motion to Dismiss, lead plaintiff will need an additional 10 pages to 

fully respond to all of defendants’ arguments; and 

WHEREAS, defendants have agreed to stipulate to an extension of the page limit for lead 

plaintiff’s response to 35 pages, and, in turn, seeks a 5-page extension for their reply brief. 

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by lead plaintiff and defendants, 

through their respective counsel of record, that, subject to the Court’s approval, lead plaintiff shall 

have 35 pages to respond to defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and defendants shall have 20 pages for 

their reply brief. 

DATED: April 14, 2008 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

DENNIS J. HERMAN 

DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM 

/s/

DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM

100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415/288-4545 

415/288-4534 (fax)

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW Document 30 Filed 04/18/08 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR 

BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS - 4:07-cv-04972-CW -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: April 14, 2008 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

LAURENCE WEISS 

/s/

LAURENCE WEISS

275 Middlefield Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: 650/324-7000 

650/324-0638 (fax)

Attorneys for Defendants 

I, Daniel J. Pfefferbaum, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT FOR 

BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby 

attest that Laurence A. Weiss has concurred in this filing. 

/s/

DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM

* * * 

O R D E R 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, lead plaintiff shall have 35 pages to respond to defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss and defendants shall have 20 pages for their reply brief. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 4/18/08 

DATED: _________________________ ____________________________________ 

THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

C:\DOCUME~1\JCohen\LOCALS~1\Temp\9\MetaSave\STP00050537.doc 

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW Document 30 Filed 04/18/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 14, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail 

addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I have 

mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non-CM/ECF 

participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List. 

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 14, 2008. 

 /s/ 

 DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM 

COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

100 Pine Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415/288-4545 

415/288-4534 (fax) 

E-mail:dpfefferbaum@csgrr.com

Case 4:07-cv-04972-CW Document 30 Filed 04/18/08 Page 4 of 4