Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01302/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01302-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORENZO FOSSELMAN, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. DIMMER and JOHNSON,

Defendants.

No. 1:12-cv-01302-DAD-SAB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT 

(Doc. Nos. 38 & 43)

Plaintiff Lorenzo Fosselman, Jr. is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On May 18, 2016, the assigned magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,

recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment due to plaintiff’s alleged failure to 

exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit be denied. (Doc. No. 43.) The findings 

and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that objections thereto 

were to be filed within thirty days. (Id.) More than thirty days have passed, and no objections 

have been filed. 

/////

Case 1:12-cv-01302-DAD-SAB Document 60 Filed 09/15/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, 

1. The May 18, 2016 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 43) are adopted in full; 

and

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment due to plaintiff’s alleged failure to exhaust 

his administrative remedies prior to filing suit (Doc. No. 38) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01302-DAD-SAB Document 60 Filed 09/15/16 Page 2 of 2