Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01348/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01348-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Edward W. Swanson SBN 159859

SWANSON, McNAMARA & HALLER LLP

300 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 477-3800

Facsimile: (415) 477-9010 

Attorney for Petitioner Dung The Pham

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUNG THE PHAM

Petitioner,

vs.

C.A. TERHUNE,

Respondent.

C 02-1348 PJH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO

CONDUCT ANALYSIS OF

GUNSHOT RESIDUE SAMPLES

STIPULATION

Petitioner Dung The Pham, by and through his counsel Edward W. Swanson, and

Respondent, by and through his counsel Deputy Attorney General Glenn R. Pruden, hereby agree

and stipulate as follows:

1. On July 17, 2006, the Court ordered the State to provide gunshot residue samples

to Petitioner within 30 days and Petitioner to have the samples analyzed within 60 days. See

Docket No. 72.

2. Due to difficulties in retrieving the samples from custody of the California

Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara, Petitioner’s expert will not receive the samples

until September 13, 2006, only two (2) days before the Court’s deadline for completing the

analysis.

3. Petitioner’s expert has informed Petitioner’s counsel that it will take two (2)

Case 4:02-cv-01348-PJH Document 74 Filed 09/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: GSR ANALYSIS

Pham v. Terhune, Case No. C 02-1348 PJH 2

weeks from the time the samples are received to complete the analysis of the samples.

4. In light of the foregoing, the parties request that the time for completing

Petitioner’s analysis of the samples be extended by 14 days, to September 29, 2006.

5. The parties further request that the remaining deadlines under the Court’s Order of

July 17, 2006, remain unchanged, to wit: Petitioner will provide the State with raw data and

laboratory notes, and will inform the Court in writing that testing has been completed, within 10

days of test completion; Petitioner will file a supplemental brief within 30 days of test

completion; the State will file its opposition no later than 30 days after Petitioner’s brief is filed;

and Petitioner will file a reply no later than 7 days after the State’s opposition is filed.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: September 12, 2006 /s/ 

Edward W. Swanson

Swanson, McNamara & Haller LLP

Attorneys for DUNG THE PHAM

Dated: September 12, 2006 /s/ 

Glenn R. Pruden

Deputy Attorney General

Attorney for Respondent

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Judge

9/14/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:02-cv-01348-PJH Document 74 Filed 09/14/06 Page 2 of 2