Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-02982/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-02982-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 540
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JORDAN B. STERNS,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 13cv2982-LAB (KSC)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

vs.

MR. LAWRENCE,

Defendant.

Petitioner Jordan Sterns, a prisoner in federal custody, filed this petition seeking relief

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Sterns challenges the conditions of his confinement; specifically,

he argues that he has inadequate access to a law library and as a result cannot properly

defend himself in an unnamed criminal case. He seeks an order requiring that he be

transferred to a different facility with an adequate law library. 

The Court is required to screen pleadings filed by prisoners, and to dismiss them to

the extent they fail to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court is also obligated to

confirm its own jurisdiction, sua sponte if necessary. See United Investors Life Ins. Co. v.

Waddell & Reed Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 966 (9th Cir. 2004).

Under § 2241, habeas relief is available to a federal prisoner in federal custody if he

can show he is “in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United

States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(1) & (3). But Sterns is challenging the conditions of his

confinement, and not the fact or duration of his confinement. A civil rights action, not a

- 1 - 13cv2982

Case 3:13-cv-02982-LAB-KSC Document 2 Filed 09/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

habeas corpus proceeding, is the proper mechanism for a prisoner seeking to challenge the

conditions of his confinement. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau

of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

Furthermore, in both the criminal cases against Sterns, 11cr4789-BTM and 11cr3920-

BTM, both titled United States v. Sterns, he has been represented by counsel. He is not

entitled to a law library. See Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 829 (1977) (right of access to

courts requires providing prisoners with adequate law libraries or adequate assistance from

persons trained in the law); United States v. Wilson, 690 F.2d 1267, 1293 (9th Cir. 1982)

(criminal defendant represented by counsel was not entitled to access to a law library). And

to the extent he claims he cannot adequately represent himself, that claim is moot. 

The petition is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 8, 2015

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge

- 2 - 13cv2982

Case 3:13-cv-02982-LAB-KSC Document 2 Filed 09/09/15 Page 2 of 2