Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00382/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00382-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

STIPULATION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND 

CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: service@moorelawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Arthur Owens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTHUR OWENS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ISHIHARA-LIANG, INC. dba EDO-YA 

TOKYO CUISINE, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-cv-00382-LJO-SMS

STIPULATION FOR FURTHER 

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT AMI WINEPRESS, L.P.’S 

RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

ORDER

WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for June 

22, 2016, pursuant to the Court’s Order dated March 18, 2016 (Dkt. 3);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Arthur Owens (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, AMI Winepress, L.P.

(“AMI”), previously stipulated to an extension of time for AMI’s responsive pleading such that 

the responsive pleading is due on May 27, 2016 (Dkt. 8);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, AMI, and Defendant Ishihara-Liang, Inc. dba Edo-Ya Tokyo 

Cuisine (“Ishihara,” and together with Plaintiff and AMI, “the Parties”), are engaging in 

settlement discussions and wish to exhaust such efforts before incurring the fees and costs 

associated with AMI’s responsive pleading and the Scheduling Conference, and to conserve 

Court resources;

Case 1:16-cv-00382-LJO-SMS Document 11 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND 

CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to a 

continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for June 22, 2016 to a date 

at the Court’s convenience after July 29, 2016, and to a further extension of time for AMI’s 

responsive pleading such that it be due on July 15, 2016.

Dated: May 27, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

 Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff, 

Arthur Owens

Dated: May 27, 2016 CAMPAGNE & CAMPAGNE, 

A Professional Corporation 

/s/ Justin T. Campagne

 Justin T. Campagne

Attorneys for Defendant, 

Ishihara-Liang, Inc. dba Edo-Ya Tokyo Cuisine

Dated: May 31, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF NICK ZINKIN

/s/ Nick Zinkin

 Nick Zinkin

Attorney for Defendant, 

AMI Winepress, L.P.

Case 1:16-cv-00382-LJO-SMS Document 11 Filed 06/01/16 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND 

CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for 

June 22, 2016 is continued to August 17, 2016 at 1:30 p.m., before Magistrate Judge Sandra M. 

Snyder. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to the 

conference. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant AMI Winepress, L.P. shall file its 

responsive pleading on or before July 15, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2016 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00382-LJO-SMS Document 11 Filed 06/01/16 Page 3 of 3