Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01377/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01377-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN D. BRYANT, 

 

Plaintiff, 

 

vs. 

 

APOTEX, INC., et al., 

 

Defendants. 

 /

Case No. 1:12-cv-01377 LJO JLT

 

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE

(Doc. 45)

On January 2, 2013, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why sanctions should

not be imposed on him for failing to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants’

motion for judgment on the pleadings as previously ordered by the Court. (Doc. 45.) On January 22,

2013, Plaintiff filed his response. Plaintiff asserts that he had no access to the prison law library from

December 18, 2012 to December 27, 2012 due to the Christmas holiday. Plaintiff further asserts that

the copy machine was broken from December 27, 2012 to at least January 2, 2013. Thus, according to

Plaintiff, he was unable to file his opposition papers and his request for an extension of time in a more

timely fashion.

Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby DISCHARGES its January 2, 2013 order to

show cause. Nevertheless, the Court takes this opportunity to remind Plaintiff that deadlines set by the

Court will be strictly enforced.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill B9ed48

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01377-LJO-JLT Document 50 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 1