Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01317/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01317-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________________

Stipulation Extending Date to Respond to Complaint - 1 -

Michele A. Engnath, #149486

Law Offices of Michele A. Engnath

11521 Excelsior Avenue

Hanford, California 93230

Phone: 559-582-8781

Fax: 559-582-8784

E-Mail: mae@micheleengnath.com

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Anlin Industries, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(Fresno Division)

ANLIN INDUSTRIES, INC., a California

corporation, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

PAUL BURGESS, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-01317-REC-DLB

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO FILE

RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS

Whereas, the summons and complaint were personally served on Defendant, Paul Burgess, on 

November 16, 2005: 

Whereas, Defendant is in propria persona and requested that Plaintiff consent to an extension

of time of 30 days for the filing of Defendant’s responsive pleadings;

Whereas, pursuant to local rule 6-144(a), Plaintiff and Defendant stipulated that the time for

Defendant to file his answer and/or other responsive pleadings to Plaintiff’s complaint be extended 30

days to and including January 5, 2006:

Whereas, on January 5, 2006, Defendant requested from Plaintiff an additional week to file his

responsive pleadings; and 

Case 1:05-cv-01317-DLB Document 12 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________________

Stipulation Extending Date to Respond to Complaint - 2 -

Whereas, Plaintiff has no objection to Defendant’s request for additional time to file responsive

pleadings; 

 THE PARTIES TO THIS ACTION STIPULATE, subject to the Court’s approval, that the

time for Defendant to file his answer and/or other responsive pleadings to Plaintiff’s complaint be

extended 7 additional days to and including January 12, 2006:

Dated: January _12__ , 2006 ___/s/Michele A. Engnath___ 

Michele A. Engnath

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Anlin Industries, Inc.

Dated: January __6__, 2006 ___/s/Paul Burgess _____ 

Paul Burgess

Defendant, IN PROPRIA PERSONA

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 12, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01317-DLB Document 12 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2