Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02389/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02389-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:6901 Resource &amp; Recovery Act

---

-1- 

DTSC v. PAYLESS CLEANERS , et al. , U.S. DISTRICT COURT #CIV. S-02-2389 LKK DAD , 13 - 4659 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF THIRD-PARTY ACTION 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Celene M.E. Boggs, #172577 

STAMMER, McKNIGHT, BARNUM & BAILEY LLP 

2540 West Shaw Lane, Suite 110 (97311-2765) 

Post Office Box 9789 

Fresno, CA 93794-9789 

(559) 449-0571 

Attorneys for: Third-Party Defendant, 

MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

***** 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC 

SUBSTANCES CONTROL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PAYLESS CLEANERS, COLLEGE CLEANERS, 

HEIDINGER CLEANERS, NORGE VILLAGE 

CLEANERS, CAVA, INC., a California corporation, 

LOBDELL CLEANERS, CITY OF CHICO, 

NORCILLE R. WEISS, JANET L. WEISS, PAUL A 

TULLIUS, VICTORIA L. TULLIUS, ROBERT H. 

HEIDINGER, INEZ N. HEIDINGER, 5th AND IVY, a 

general partnership, RICHARD C. PETERS AND 

RAMONA W. PETERS, individually and as trustees of 

the Peters Family Trust, BETTY M. ROLLAG, 

RANDALL ROLLAG, and TAMI ROLLAG, 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________________ 

ROBERT H. HEIDINGER and INEZ N. HEIDINGER

Third-Party Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC. 

Third-Party Defendant. 

____________________________________________ 

And Related Cross-Claims. 

___________________________________________ 

 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO: CIV. S-02-2389 LKK DAD 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF 

THIRD-PARTY ACTION 

Complaint Filed: 10/31/02 

Third-Party Complaint Filed: 02/03/03

Trial Date: 01/23/08

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-02389-LKK -DAD Document 196 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

DTSC v. PAYLESS CLEANERS , et al. , U.S. DISTRICT COURT #CIV. S-02-2389 LKK DAD , 13 - 4659 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF THIRD-PARTY ACTION 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff ROBERT H. HEIDINER, individually and as 

substituted party for INEZ N. HEIDINGER (hereinafter “HEIDINGERS”), and Third-Party 

Defendant MARTIN FRANCHISES INC., (hereinafter “MFI”) acknowledge that: 

1.) The HEIDINGERS are the only parties who have brought claims against MFI 

and there are no other parties involved in the Third-Party Action brought by the 

HEIDINGERS; 

2.) MFI and the HEIDINGERS are unaware of any other party who has expressed an 

interest in bringing or sought to bring a direct claim against MFI in this action; 

3.) The HEIDINGERS agree to execute a Settlement Agreement and General 

Release which will include in the terms that the parties shall bear their own costs, expenses and 

attorneys’ fees arising out of this action. 

4.) The HEIDINGERS agree to dismiss MFI with prejudice. 

5.) Each party agrees to bear his/her/its own costs. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the HEIDINGERS and MFI that the 

Third Party Action between them is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to F.R.C.P., 

Rule 41(a)(1) and (c) and that each party is to bear his/her/its own costs. 

DATED: September 6, 2006 STAMMER, McKNIGHT, BARNUM & BAILEY LLP 

By: /s/ Celene M. E. Boggs__________________

Celene M.E. Boggs, Attorneys for Third-Party 

Defendant MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC. 

DATED: August 30, 2006 ISOLA BOWERS, LLP 

By: /s/ David R. Isola_______________________ 

David R. Isola, Attorneys for Defendants 

and Third-Party Plaintiffs ROBERT H. HEIDINGER, 

and INEZ N. HEIDINGER. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-02389-LKK -DAD Document 196 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

DTSC v. PAYLESS CLEANERS , et al. , U.S. DISTRICT COURT #CIV. S-02-2389 LKK DAD , 13 - 4659 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF THIRD-PARTY ACTION 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IT IS HEREBY ORDRED that the Third Party Action filed by Defendants and ThirdParty Plaintiffs ROBERT H. HEIDINGER and INEZ N. HEIDINGER against Third-Party 

Defendant MARTIN FRANCHISES, INC. is dismissed with prejudice and each party is to bear 

his/her/its own costs. 

DATED: September 11, 2006.

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-02389-LKK -DAD Document 196 Filed 09/12/06 Page 3 of 3