Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01125/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01125-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KING HALL CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC

CARTER C. WHITE, State Bar No. 164149

U.C. Davis School of Law

One Shields Avenue, Bldg. TB-30

Davis, CA 95616-5440

Telephone: (530) 752-5440

Fax: (530) 752-5788

ccwhite@ucdavis.edu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Pursuant to Local Rule 143 the parties stipulate and ask the Court to Order that the 

deadline for filing objections to the Findings and Recommendations as well as the deadline for 

the Plaintiff to file a motion for leave to amend complaint be extended an additional fourteen 

days, so that the deadline will be February 20, 2015.

On January 23, 2015, the Magistrate Judge entered an Order and Findings and 

Recommendations. ECF No. 74. The order grants to parties fourteen days to file objections. Id., 

at 22. In addition, the Court grants the Plaintiff fourteen days to file a motion for leave to amend 

complaint, along with a proposed amended complaint. Id., at 21. The current deadline is 

therefore February 6, 2015. The parties ask that the time be extended an additional fourteen 

days, to on or before February 20, 2015.

BRANDON ALEXANDER FERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF CORR., et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 2:11-cv-1125-MCE KJN P

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S 

OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

AND TO FILE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

AMEND COMPLAINT

Case 2:11-cv-01125-MCE-KJN Document 76 Filed 01/28/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Good cause exists for this extension. Counsel for Plaintiff has several pending deadlines. 

These include the filing of the Appellant’s Reply Brief in No. 13-15963, Fields v. Burson, et al. , 

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (due February 6, 2015) and the filing of the 

Plaintiff’s pretrial statement in No. 2:08-cv-02767-TLN-EFB, Jayne v. Bosenko, et al., United 

States District Court, Eastern District of California (due February 13, 2015). The substantive 

work on these cases is being performed by Certified Law Students working under the supervision 

of Counsel for Plaintiff, so that additional time is necessary for the completion of each task. In 

the Jayne matter, Counsel for Plaintiff was only recently appointed to the case and preparation of 

the pretrial statement requires the review of an extensive record, including hundreds of pages of 

hearing transcripts and summary judgment evidence.

For these reasons, the parties ask the Court to extend the deadline by fourteen days, to on 

or before February 20, 2015, for objections to the Findings and Recommendations issued 

January 23, 2015, as well as the deadline for Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 

and Proposed Amended Complaint.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 23, 2015 Carter C. White

____________________

Carter C. White

Attorney for Plaintiff, Brandon A. Fernandez

Dated: January 23, 2015 R. Lawrence Bragg

____________________

R. Lawrence Bragg

Deputy Attorney General

Attorney for Defendants Cate, Pomazal, and Barnes

Case 2:11-cv-01125-MCE-KJN Document 76 Filed 01/28/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 Good cause appearing, the deadlines for filing objections to Findings and 

Recommendations issued January 23, 2015, and for filing Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend 

Complaint and Proposed Amended Complaint, are hereby extended to February 20, 2015. 

Dated: January 28, 2015

/fern1125.eot

Case 2:11-cv-01125-MCE-KJN Document 76 Filed 01/28/15 Page 3 of 3