Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02466/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02466-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 05:552 Right to Privacy Act

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND 

RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS FILED AUGUST 5, 2013

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

JAMES BROCK WALKER (Ca State Bar No. 155048)

P.O. Box 5305

Vandenberg AFB, CA 93437

(916) 995-4760 (phone)

jwalker345@aol.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

GARY TAYLOR,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING 

SERVICE (DFAS), UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA, HARRY M. WYATT III, DAVID 

S. BALDWIN, MARK GROVES, TERESA 

MCKAY, and DOES ONE THROUGH TEN.

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No.: 2:12-cv-02466 WBS DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE HEARING AND 

RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON 

MOTIONS FILED AUGUST 5, 2013 

Old date: Oct. 21, 2013

New date: Nov 18, 2013

Time: 2:00 PM

Ctrm: 5 (Judge Shubb) 

The parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court as 

provided for hereon, stipulate as follows:

1. That the hearing on defendants' dispositive motions filed August 5, 2013, set for 

October 21, 2013, at 2:00 PM, be CONTINUED for four weeks, until November 18, 2013, at 

2:00 PM, before Judge Shubb.

Case 2:12-cv-02466-WBS-DAD Document 44 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND 

RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS FILED AUGUST 5, 2013

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2. That the briefing dates set by Order filed August 16, 2013, be EXTENDED by 

the same four-week amount as follows: oppositions from September 3 until October 1, 2013; 

and replies from October 7 until November 4, 2013. 

3. One previous continuance has been granted by Order filed August 16, 2013, 

extending the opposition time by two weeks.

4. The reason to extend the opposition date is that after reading the motions, 

plaintiff's counsel needs an extra four weeks to conclude settlement discussions already 

initiated, and to oppose, including possibly bringing significant new evidence. Such evidence 

may require defendants to use the full time allowed for replies.

Dated: September 3, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF JAMES BROCK 

WALKER

/s/JWalker (as authorized 9/3/13)

JAMES BROCK WALKER

Dated: September 3, 2013 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

/s/ YHimel (as authorized 9/3/13)

YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL

Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

Upon the parties' stipulation, the hearing on defendants' dispositive motions (Docket 

Nos. 39 and 40) filed August 5, 2013, set for October 21, at 2:00 PM, is CONTINUED until 

Case 2:12-cv-02466-WBS-DAD Document 44 Filed 09/04/13 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND 

RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS FILED AUGUST 5, 2013

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

November 18, 2013, at 2:00 PM, before Judge Shubb, with oppositions due October 1, 2013, 

and replies due November 4, 2013.

It is APPROVED and SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 3, 2013

Case 2:12-cv-02466-WBS-DAD Document 44 Filed 09/04/13 Page 3 of 3