Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01803/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01803-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 385
Nature of Suit: Property Damage - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Property

---

Order

 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TASION COMMUNICATIONS INC., a 

Canadian corporation, dba Planet Telecom, 

on behalf of itself and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE No. CV 13-1803-EMC

ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS 

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO 

FILE PORTIONS OF MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED 

COMPLAINT OR SUPPLEMENT 

UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL 

RULE 79-5

Date: June 23, 2015

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Judge:

Ctrm:

Hon. Edward Chen 

5 (17th Floor)

Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Portions of Reply in 

Support of Motion For Leave To File a Fourth Amended Complaint or Supplement and 

Supporting Documents Under Seal Pursuant To Local Rule 79-5, and good cause appearing 

therefore, Plaintiffs’ Motion is hereby GRANTED IN PART. 

Case 3:13-cv-01803-EMC Document 167 Filed 05/26/15 Page 1 of 3
Order

 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, the following documents shall remain sealed in 

accordance with Local Rule 79-5:

Document Name Portion or Entirety Sealed

UBN 20217, attached as Ex. 8 to 

Himmelfarb Decl.;

UBN 19922, attached as Ex. 9 to 

Himmelfarb Decl.;

UBN 20178, attached as Ex. 10 to 

Himmelfarb Decl.; 

UBN 19741, attached as Ex. 11 to 

Himmelfarb Decl.

UBN 19877, attached as Ex. 12 to 

Himmelfarb Decl.;

UBN 20170, attached as Ex. 13 to 

Himmelfarb Decl.;

UBN 18956, attached as Ex. 14 to 

Himmelfarb Decl. 

Entirely Sealed

Although the exhibits attached to the Himmelfarb declaration shall be filed under seal, 

the Court finds that the redactions made by Plaintiffs in their reply brief are overbroad and not 

sufficiently narrowly tailored. The parties shall meet and confer to refine the redactions so that 

only that information which reflects confidential commercial information shall be redacted. 

For example, the Court sees no need to redact the fact that there was UV testing on the product 

at issue or what the general results of that testing were. These examples are not exhaustive.

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:13-cv-01803-EMC Document 167 Filed 05/26/15 Page 2 of 3
Order

 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties shall jointly submit proposed redactions (more narrowly tailored) for the 

reply brief within one week of the date of this order. The parties are further advised that their 

future filings should take into account the Court’s ruling herein. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 26, 2015

_______________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-01803-EMC Document 167 Filed 05/26/15 Page 3 of 3