Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01428/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01428-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL CAST,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN D’AGOSTINI, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:23-cv-1428 KJN P

ORDER and FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed December 28, 2023, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to 

the court, within thirty days, the Notice of Submission of Documents, along with the three copies 

of the second amended complaint required to effect service on defendants. Plaintiff was warned

that failure to return the required documents within the specified time period would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 17 at 2.) The thirty-day period has 

since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:23-cv-01428-TLN-KJN Document 18 Filed 01/31/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 31, 2024

/cast1428.fusm

Case 2:23-cv-01428-TLN-KJN Document 18 Filed 01/31/24 Page 2 of 2