Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04724/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04724-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

PROPOSED CASE MGMT. ORDER

No. 5:15-cv-03820-RMW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE RESISTORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No: 5:15-cv-03820 RMW

[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT 

ORDER

As discussed at the case management conference, the Court sets the following case management 

deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10 to resolve the 

Intervenor United States Department of Justice’s request for a stay of discovery:

Event Deadline

Plaintiffs, Defendants, and Intervenor U.S. 

Department of Justice complete meet & confers and 

file initial submissions

January 8, 2016

Responses to initial submissions January 22, 2016

Case Management Conference January 29, 2016 at 10:30 a.m.

If the parties are able to come to agreement about the scope of the proposed stay by January 8, the 

parties shall file a single document so indicating and attach a copy of the agreed-upon proposed order to 

the filing. If the parties are unable to reach agreement, each party shall submit its proposal for a stay on 

January 8, which shall include a proposed order setting forth the terms of the proposed stay. To facilitate 

comparison of the competing proposals, the parties shall use the Department of Justice’s proposed order 

as a starting point and redline their proposed changes against that version.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 31, 2015

__________________________________

Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-04724-JD Document 21 Filed 12/31/15 Page 1 of 1