Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-02160/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-02160-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHS West:260932045.1

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV 10 2160 (BZ)

ROBERT E. FREITAS (State Bar No. 80948)

rfreitas@orrick.com

MATTHEW H. POPPE (State Bar No. 177854)

mspillner@orrick.com

KRISTIN S. CORNUELLE (State Bar No. 245728)

kcornuelle@orrick.com

JACOB A. SNOW (pending admission)

jsnow@orrick.com

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 614-7400

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401

Attorneys for Defendant

Hantle USA, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

HYOSUNG (AMERICA), INC. and 

NAUTILUS HYOSUNG INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HANTLE USA, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. CV10-2160 BZ

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Complaint Filed: May 19, 2010

Judge: The Honorable Bernard Zimmerman

Case 4:10-cv-02160-SBA Document 8 Filed 06/10/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHS West:260932045.1 - 1 -

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV 10 2160 (BZ)

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Hyosung (America), Inc. and Nautilus Hyosung Inc. (“Plaintiffs”)

filed a Complaint For Avoidance And Recovery Of Fraudulent Conveyance And Related Claims

on or about May 19, 2010 against Defendant Hantle USA, Inc. (“Defendant”);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs served Defendant with the Complaint and other documents on or 

about May 19, 2010;

WHEREAS, Defendant’s response to the Complaint was originally due on or before 

June 9, 2010;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to grant Defendant an extension of time to and 

including June 16, 2010 in which to respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, this is the first such extension of time and not for the purposes of delay,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through 

their respective attorneys of record, as follows:

The parties jointly stipulate that Defendant’s time in which to answer, move or otherwise 

respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint shall be extended to and including June 16, 2010.

Dated: June 9, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

ROBERT E. FREITAS

MATTHEW H. POPPE

KRISTIN S. CORNUELLE

JACOB A. SNOW

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

/s/ Matthew H. Poppe /s/

Matthew H. Poppe

Attorneys for Defendant

Hantle USA, Inc.

Dated: June 9, 2010 ADAM A. LEWIS

GRANT L. KIM

ALISON M. TUCHER

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

/s/ Grant L. Kim /s/

Grant L. Kim

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Hyosung (America), Inc. and

Nautilus Hyosung, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 4:10-cv-02160-SBA Document 8 Filed 06/10/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHS West:260932045.1 - 2 -

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV 10 2160 (BZ)

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, §X(B), I attest under penalty of 

perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory. 

Dated: June 9, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Matthew H. Poppe /s/

Matthew H. Poppe

Case 4:10-cv-02160-SBA Document 8 Filed 06/10/10 Page 3 of 3