Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02917/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02917-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 1 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

TERRENCE A. CALLAN (CA Bar No. 036305) 

 terrence.callan@pillsburylaw.com 

ALBERT J. BORO, JR. (CA Bar No. 126657) 

 albert.boro@pillsburylaw.com 

RYAN K. TAKEMOTO (CA Bar No. 221169) 

 ryan.takemoto@pillsburylaw.com 

50 Fremont Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 983-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. and 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-06-2917 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

WHEREAS, the parties may have proprietary information and documents that are 

not in the public domain and are confidential, the unrestricted disclosure of which may 

cause undue irreparable damage to the parties and their respective businesses; and 

WHEREAS, one of the purposes of this Protective Order is to protect the 

confidentiality of such information and documents; and 

WHEREAS, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for the issuance of 

protective orders limiting the disclosure of certain information in appropriate 

circumstances; and 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 2 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to protect the confidentiality of such 

information in accordance with the following terms and conditions: 

1. Documents that contain non-public information may be designated as 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” in the manner described below, so long as the 

materials concern the producing party’s trade secrets or other confidential research and 

development or commercial information, or information which the producing party 

otherwise has compelling need for confidentiality. This includes, without limitation: 

(a) documents, exhibits, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admissions 

and deposition transcriptions and all original written, recorded, graphic or electronic 

matters (and all identical and non-identical copies thereof), (b) any copies, notes, abstracts 

or summaries of such information, and the information itself, or (c) any pleading, affidavit, 

declaration, brief, motion, transcript or other writing containing such information 

(subsections (a) to (c) collectively referred to herein as “Litigation Materials”), all of which 

may be designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” under this Protective Order, 

as appropriate. Further, Litigation Materials previously designated “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential” by the parties pursuant to the protective order entered by the court in 

In re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation, U.S.D.C. Northern 

District of California, Case No. 02-1486 PJH, on July 11, 2003, or pursuant to the 

protective order entered by the court in Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor, 

Inc., et al., Case No 06-016655 PJH, on August 21, 2006, as amended, shall receive all the 

protections afforded “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” Litigation Materials under 

this Protective Order. 

2. Only non-public documents produced in discovery may be designated as 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential.” Accordingly, “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential” materials shall not include any documents concerning information that at any 

time has been: (a) produced, disclosed or made available to the public or otherwise 

available for public access; or (b) disclosed in connection with any governmental public 

filing or securities offering and could not reasonably be assumed to be or have been 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 3 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

intended to be kept confidential. Documents containing trade secrets, or other confidential 

research and development or proprietary business information, the disclosure of which to 

other parties might competitively disadvantage the producing party, may be designated as 

“Highly Confidential.” Any document concerning information that has not been preserved 

or maintained in a manner calculated to preserve its confidentiality shall not be designated 

as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential." Notwithstanding the foregoing, a producing 

party may designate as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential" any documents transmitted 

or disclosed to any governmental entity pursuant to a written confidentiality agreement or 

which is protected as confidential by statute, rule or regulation. 

3. All "Highly Confidential" or "Confidential" Litigation Materials shall be 

used by the parties and their counsel solely for the purpose of the prosecution or defense of 

this litigation, Case No. C06-02917 PJH, including preparing for and conducting pre-trial 

proceedings in this action. Litigation Materials designated as "Confidential" or "Highly 

Confidential" shall not be disclosed to anyone except as provided herein and the contents 

thereof shall not be used for any business, commercial or competitive purpose, or used in 

any manner in any other case, litigation or proceedings whether or not factually related to 

this action. 

4. (a) Parties shall designate documents in good faith, and shall not 

indiscriminately designate documents, so that produced documents are not over-designated 

as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential." Any party may object in good faith to the 

designation of Litigation Materials. The process for resolving disputes as set forth below 

presumes this good faith in the initial designations, objections and meet and confer process. 

The following process will apply to resolution of disputes hereunder: 

1) any party who objects to a designation by a producing party shall state concisely the 

basis for those objections in a letter to the producing party which said letter shall not exceed 

5 pages; 2) the letter need only be served by fax on the producing party to start this process; 

3) the objecting party and producing party shall have ten days from the date the letter is 

faxed to meet and confer to resolve the objections and/or narrow issues to be briefed; 4) any 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 3 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 4 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

objections not so resolved shall be the subject of a regularly noticed motion filed by the 

objecting party, but the producing party shall have the burden to support the contested 

designations; 5) said motion shall be filed and served no later than thirty days after the meet 

and confer period ends; 6) the objecting party shall be allowed to file an extended reply 

brief of up to 15 pages, unless leave of Court is obtained to file a longer reply brief; and 7) 

only the objecting and producing parties shall file briefs, but other parties may file a twopage brief, unless leave of Court is obtained to file a longer brief. 

 (b) In addition to the procedures described above, the following shall 

apply to the process: 1) a party shall not be obligated to challenge the propriety of a 

confidential designation at the time that designation is made, and failure to so challenge 

does not preclude a subsequent challenge; 2) with the permission of the Court, either the 

producing or objecting party may request a short informal discovery conference to be held 

telephonically with the Court in order to avoid the need for any motion; 3) said conference 

shall be held during the ten-day meet and confer period, or the thirty-day period for 

bringing the motion in accordance with the convenience of the Court; 4) if the producing 

party does not oppose the motion, then designations which are the subject of the objections 

are declassified; and 5) the parties will attempt in good faith to combine as many issues 

under this Protective Order as possible so that said matters can be handled efficiently and 

effectively, and the parties further reserve the right to request, for good cause shown, 

additional time to file any motion. 

5. Any Litigation Materials the designation of which is subject to such dispute 

shall be treated as "Confidential" or Highly Confidential" as designated by the producing 

party pending resolution of the dispute by this Court. 

6. If any party or non-party uses Litigation Materials designated as 

"Confidential" or "Highly Confidential" pursuant to this Protective Order during the course 

of a deposition herein, that portion of the deposition record reflecting such "Confidential" 

or "Highly Confidential" information shall be stamped as "Confidential" or "Highly 

Confidential" and access thereto shall be limited pursuant to the other terms of this 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 4 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 5 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

Protective Order. Counsel may invoke the provisions of this Protective Order by stating on 

the record during the deposition that testimony given at the deposition is designated 

"Confidential" or "Highly Confidential," or by designating the deposition transcript or 

portions thereof as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” before the time expires within 

which the witness may sign the deposition transcript. No person shall be present during 

portions of the depositions designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential,” unless such 

person is authorized under the terms of this order to receive Litigation Materials containing 

such confidential information or unless the producing party consents to such person being 

present. All information disclosed during a deposition shall be deemed to have been 

designated "Highly Confidential" until the time within which the witness may sign the 

transcript expires, whether or not any portion of the transcript has been so designated 

previously. 

7. Nothing in this Order affects the right of the party or non-party that 

produced "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential" Litigation Materials to use or disclose 

such information in any way. Such disclosure shall not waive the protections of this 

Protective Order and shall not entitle other parties, non-parties or their attorneys to use or 

disclose such information in violation of the Protective Order, except that if the producing 

party uses such materials in a manner inconsistent with their confidential status, then that 

shall serve as a basis to object to the designation and said objections shall be resolved as set 

forth in paragraph 4 above. 

8. In the event that documents or Litigation Materials are produced by another 

person which are actual copies of documents or other Litigation Materials which a party has 

produced and designated "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential," that party may designate 

such materials under this Protective Order even if they have not been so designated by the 

person producing them. To the extent that a person produces documents which are not 

actual copies of documents previously produced and designated by a party but which 

contain a party's "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential" information, a party may 

designate those documents, or portions thereof as may be appropriate, as "Confidential" or 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 5 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 6 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

"Highly Confidential, subject to the dispute resolution process set forth in paragraph 4 

above. Said designations shall be made as soon as reasonably possible, and shall contain 

the Bates stamp number(s) of the portions of the documents designated, the nature of the 

designations, and if an entire document is designated, which portions of the document 

contain the information supporting the designation so that an objecting party may determine 

what information is specifically at issue. 

9. Litigation Materials marked or treated as "Confidential" or copies or extracts 

therefrom and the information therein, may be given, shown, made available to, or 

communicated to only the following: 

 a. the Court, all Court personnel, any discovery referee or any 

settlement mediator; 

 b. court reporters and videographers who record depositions or other 

testimony in this action; 

 c. named parties including an officer, director or in-house counsel of a 

named party or its affiliated companies; 

 d. other employees of a named party or its affiliated companies, but 

only for the specific purpose of working directly on the litigation at the request or at the 

direction of counsel; 

 e. outside counsel for the named parties and employees of such counsel 

to whom it is necessary that the Litigation Materials be shown for purposes of this 

litigation; 

 f. pursuant to the provision of paragraph 12(a), consultants and experts 

to whom it is necessary that the Litigation Materials be shown for purpose of assisting 

counsel in this litigation; 

 g. deposition witnesses; 

 h. employees of copying, imaging and computer services for the 

purpose of copying, imaging or organizing documents provided that all documents 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 6 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 7 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

designated as "Confidential" are retrieved by the party furnishing those documents upon 

completion of the services; 

 i. any other person upon the written agreement of the party or nonparty who designated the Litigation Materials as "Confidential" (which agreement may be 

recorded in a deposition or other transcript), or pursuant to court order; and 

 j. the author, addresses and recipient of the documents or any person 

who would have had access to such information by virtue of his/her employment. 

10. Litigation Materials marked or treated as "Highly Confidential" or copies or 

extracts therefrom and the information therein, may be given, shown, made available to or 

communicated to only the following: 

 a. the Court, all Court personnel, any discovery referee or any 

settlement mediator; 

 b. Court reporters and videographers who record depositions or other 

testimony in this action; 

 c. employees of copying, imaging and computer services for the 

purpose of copying, imaging, or organizing documents provided that all documents 

designated as "Highly Confidential" are retrieved by the party furnishing those documents 

upon completion of the services; 

 d. counsel of the law firms signing this stipulation or employees of such 

counsel to whom it is necessary that the Litigation Material be shown for purposes of this 

litigation; 

 e. in-house counsel for a named party or its affiliated companies, so 

long as this in-house counsel has executed the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A, 

provided, however, that if (i) such person is an in-house counsel for a party that is a 

defendant in this action or for an affiliated company of a defendant and (ii) the "Highly 

Confidential" documents have been produced by a defendant, then such in-house counsel 

must be approved in writing by the producing defendant to receive its "Highly 

Confidential" documents, unless otherwise ordered by the Court; 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 7 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 8 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

 f. pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 12(a)-(c), consultants and 

experts to whom it is necessary that the Litigation Materials be shown for purposes of 

assisting counsel in this litigation; and 

 g. the author, addressees and recipients or any person who would have 

had access to such information by virtue of his/her employment as well as deposition 

witnesses presently employed by the party producing the highly confidential document. 

11. If a party in this litigation other than the producing party desires to give, 

show, make available or communicate any Litigation Materials marked or treated as 

"Confidential" or "Highly Confidential" to any person who is not specifically authorized 

pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order to have access to such Litigation Materials, 

the party intending to disclose the materials shall notify the producing party of such intent 

no less than three business days prior to the intended disclosure. Said notification shall be 

sufficiently specific to inform the producing party of the intended scope of the disclosure, 

including the name and/or job description of the person to whom such disclosure is 

intended. The parties will then attempt to negotiate the terms of disclosure within two 

business days of the notification. If no agreement can be reached during this shortened 

meet and confer period, then this dispute shall be the subject of regularly noticed motion 

filed by the objecting party with the producing party bearing the burden to support 

nondisclosure, pursuant to the dispute resolution procedure in paragraph 4 above, except 

that any party may move on an ex parte or expedited basis for an order shortening time if a 

scheduled deposition or Court date could be delayed or cancelled. This paragraph does not 

apply to "Highly Confidential" documents which are used at deposition or trial in good faith 

for impeachment purposes only; provided, however, that the party desiring to use, pursuant 

to this exception, a “Highly Confidential” document for impeachment purposes at a 

deposition shall alert the producing party at least 48 hours in advance of its intent to use the 

“Highly Confidential” document under this exception, and then the requesting party and the 

producing party shall meet and confer in good faith to address confidentiality concerns and 

appropriate redactions, with any dispute being brought to the Court's attention for resolution 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 8 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 9 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

on an expedited basis (by telephone conference or other means directed by the Court) in 

which only the requesting party and the producing party have notice or participate, so that 

the deposition is not delayed. If such a proceeding were to occur, the requesting party shall 

provide written notice of the fact of the proceeding and the production number of the 

"Highly Confidential" document at issue to the other parties to the action immediately after 

the conclusion of the deposition in which the request arose. A producing party who is 

notified of a request to use a "Highly Confidential" document for impeachment purposes, 

pursuant to this paragraph, shall not disclose the fact of that request or the document or its 

contents to the deposition witness, the attorney for the deposition witness, or any other 

party to this action. 

12. (a) If any party wishes to disclose Litigation Materials produced by any 

other party and designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” to any expert or 

consultant, the expert or consultant must sign the agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

Nothing in this Protective Order shall require that non-testifying experts or consultants be 

deposed or otherwise be the subject of discovery. 

 (b) If any party desires to disclose a defendant's information designated 

"Highly Confidential" to any expert or consultant pursuant to paragraph 10(f) above, and 

that expert or consultant, in the five years prior to the date this Order is entered, has worked 

for one of the defendants (or their predecessors) then and only then, that party must first 

identify in writing to the attorneys for the producing party that expert or consultant and a 

general description of the nature of that engagement sufficient to allow the producing party 

to determine if it will object to the disclosure of its "Highly Confidential" information to 

that expert or consultant, unless the producing party agrees to permit disclosure without 

such information. The attorney for the producing party shall have five (5) days from receipt 

of such notice to undertake the dispute resolution procedures set forth in paragraph 4 above, 

and any objections not informally resolved shall be the subject of a regularly noticed 

motion by the producing party who shall have the burden to support the restriction on 

dissemination of its "Highly Confidential" information to that expert or consultant.

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 9 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 10 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

 (c) Such identification shall include the full name, professional address 

and affiliation of the expert or consultant, the present and prior employments or 

consultancies of the expert or consultant and work done for defendants and/or their 

predecessors (other than work done for the party engaging that expert or consultant in this 

litigation). 

13. Each person (except for the Court, Court personnel, any discovery referee, 

any settlement mediator, court reporters and videographers and copying, imaging and 

computer service employees) provided access to Litigation Materials marked 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” pursuant to the terms of the Protective Order shall, 

before gaining such access, receive a copy of this Protective Order and, as to those persons 

described in paragraphs 9 and 10 shall sign an agreement in the form attached hereto as 

“Exhibit A” or shall agree to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order on the record at 

a deposition or hearing in this litigation. A file shall be maintained by each attorney of 

record for a party of all written agreements signed by persons who have received such 

Litigation Materials from that party or persons affiliated with that party. 

14. Each witness in a deposition shall be provided with a copy of this Order at 

the start of the examination and shall be advised on the record that he or she is bound by the 

terms of this Order and applicable remedies under law for violating the terms of this Order. 

15. Litigation Materials designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential,” 

when filed with pleadings or as evidence, shall be sealed in conformance with Local Rule 

79-5. 

16. “Confidential” and “Highly Confidential” Litigation Materials shall maintain 

such protections and designations in connection with any trial in this matter. Before the 

trial begins, the parties will meet and confer in good faith as part of the pre-trial conference 

statement process to put into place a procedure for identification of and use of 

“Confidential” and “Highly Confidential” documents at trial. Any documents which 

remain “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” before trial shall maintain their status 

through the time of the pre-trial conference or resolution of the procedures described above. 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 10 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 11 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

17. The provisions of this Order may be modified at any time by stipulation of 

the parties approved by order of the Court. In addition, a party may at any time apply to the 

Court for modification of this Protective Order pursuant to a motion brought in accordance 

with the rules of the Court. Nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall constitute: (i) an 

agreement by any party to produce any documents or other materials in discovery not 

otherwise agreed upon or required by court order or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 

(ii) a waiver by any person or party of any right to object to or seek a further protective 

order with respect to any discovery in this or any other action; or (iii) a waiver of any claim 

of immunity or privilege with respect to any testimony, document or information. 

18. In the event that Litigation Materials designated as “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential” are disclosed to someone not authorized under the terms of this 

Protective Order to receive such information, counsel of record for the party involved shall 

immediately give notice to counsel of record for the party who designated the Litigation 

Materials as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential,” and shall also describe the 

circumstances surrounding the unauthorized disclosure. If a party fails to treat documents 

designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” in the manner provided herein, the 

party should immediately take such steps as are necessary to have such items placed under 

seal and/or restored to their confidential status. 

19. In the event that Litigation Materials claimed to be “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential” are inadvertently produced without the appropriate designation, such 

documents and copies thereof shall be returned to the producing party within five days of 

any written notice requesting their return to affix the appropriate designation or 

immediately stamped “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” as requested by the 

producing party. The receiving party may challenge the confidential nature of the 

documents, but the inadvertent production of the documents, or the giving of testimony, 

claimed to be “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” shall not constitute a waiver of the 

confidentiality designation. 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 11 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 12 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

20. Inadvertent production of any document produced in this action by any party 

or non-party that a party or non-party later claims should have been withheld on grounds of 

a privilege, including the work product doctrine (collectively referred to as an 

“Inadvertently Produced Privileged Document”) will not be deemed to waive any privilege 

or work product protection. A party or non-party may request the return of any document 

that it inadvertently produced by identifying the Inadvertently Produced Privileged 

Document and stating the basis for withholding such document from production and 

providing any other information that would be listed on a supplemental privilege log 

disclosing the document. If a party or non-party requests the return, pursuant to this 

paragraph, of such an Inadvertently Produced Privileged Document then in the custody of 

one or more parties, the possessing parties shall within three business days return to the 

requesting party or non-party the Inadvertently Produced Privileged Document and all 

copies thereof and shall expunge from any other document or material information solely 

derived from the Inadvertently Produced Privileged Document. After a document is 

returned pursuant to this paragraph, a party may move the Court for an order compelling 

production of the document 

21. Within sixty days following termination of this litigation (including the final 

resolution of any appeals), the original and all copies, whether exact copies or compilations, 

digests or non-exact copies in any form, of Litigation Materials designated as 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” shall be returned to the party who produced such 

documents or may be disposed of in some other manner that is mutually agreeable among 

the parties. Notwithstanding this, however, counsel of record may retain their file copies of 

all court filings, deposition or hearing transcripts and exhibits, and correspondence, 

provided that counsel of record continues to treat all “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential” Litigation Materials in the manner provided for in this Protective Order. 

22. The termination of proceedings in this action shall not thereafter relieve the 

parties from the obligation of maintaining the confidentiality of all Litigation Materials 

designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” which are received pursuant to this 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 12 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 13 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

Protective Order, and are not used at trial, or are used at trial under restriction designed to 

exclude from the public record those portions of the Litigation Materials that were 

designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential.” This provision shall not apply to 

any Litigation Materials that are the subject of a superseding ruling of the Court as to the 

scope of their disclosure. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce and/or modify this 

Protective Order. 

23. The terms of this Protective Order shall apply to discovery directed to nonparties to this Litigation, and such non-parties may specifically invoke or waive the terms 

and protections of this Protective Order. To the extent that any discovery is served on a 

non-party, the party serving the discovery shall provide the non-party with a copy of this 

Protective Order and specifically mention the non-party’s right to invoke or waive the terms 

of this Protective Order. 

24. The parties acknowledge that, by entering into this Stipulation, the parties do 

not waive any claims or defenses, including defenses regarding the service of plaintiff’s 

complaint or jurisdiction. 

Dated: November 20, 2006 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

TERRENCE A. CALLAN 

ALBERT J. BORO, JR. 

RYAN K. TAKEMOTO 

50 Fremont Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

(415) 983-1000 (Telephone) 

(415) 983-1200 (Facsimile) 

By: /s/ Albert J. Boro, Jr. 

 Albert J. Boro, Jr. 

Attorneys for Defendants Hynix Semiconductor Inc. 

and Hynix Semiconductor America Inc. 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 13 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 14 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

Dated: November 20, 2006 JENNER & BLOCK LLP 

TERRENCE J. TRUAX 

DONALD HARRIS 

GABRIEL FUENTES 

BRIAN C. HAUSSMAN 

330 N. Wabash Avenue 

Chicago, IL 60611-7603 

312-222-9350 (Telephone) 

312-527-0484 (Facsimile) 

By: /s/ Terrence J. Truax 

 Terrence J. Truax 

KRIEG KELLER SLOAN REILLEY & ROMAN LLP 

KENNETH E. KELLER 

MICHAEL D. LISI 

114 Sansome Street, 4th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 249-8330 (Telephone) 

(415) 249-8333 (Facsimile) 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, and Mitsubishi 

Electric and Electronics USA, Inc. 

Dated: November 20, 2006 TOPEL AND GOODMAN 

WILLIAM GOODMAN 

ANDREA DESHAZO 

RAPHAEL GOLDMAN 

832 Sansome Street, 4th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

(415) 421-6140 (Telephone) 

(415) 398-5030 (Facsimile) 

By: /s/ Andrea DeShazo 

 Andrea DeShazo 

 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Mosel Vitelic Inc. and 

Mosel Vitelic Corporation 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 14 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 15 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

Dated: November 20, 2006 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

ROBERT E. FREITAS 

HOWARD ULLMAN 

NA’IL BENJAMIN 

CYNTHIA WICKSTRON 

E. ANNE HAWKINS 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015 

(650) 614-7400 (Telephone) 

(650) 614-7401 (Facsimile) 

By: /s/ Na’il Benjamin 

 Na’il Benjamin 

Attorneys for Defendants Nanya Technology 

Corporation and Nanya Technology Corporation (USA) 

Dated: November 20, 2006 FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW 

GARRETT & DUNNER LLP 

STEVEN MORRISSETT 

Stanford Research Park 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203 

(650) 849-6600 (Telephone) 

(650) 849-6666 (Facsimile) 

By: /s/ Steven Morrissett 

 Steven Morrissett 

COLLETTE ERICKSON FARMER & O’NEILL LLP 

WILLIAM S. FARMER, JR. 

235 Pine Street, Suite 1300 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 788-4646 (Telephone) 

(415) 788-6929 (Facsimile) 

Attorneys for Defendants Winbond Electronics 

Corporation and Winbond Electronics Corporation 

America 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 15 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 16 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

Dated: November 20, 2006 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

HARRISON J. FRAHN 

JAMES G. KREISSMAN 

2550 Hannover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

(650) 251-5000 (Telephone) 

(650) 251-5002 (Facsimile) 

By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn 

 Harrison J. Frahn 

Attorneys for Defendants Elpida Memory, Inc. and 

Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. 

Dated: November 20, 2006 KAYE SCHOLER LLP 

ATON ARBISSER 

JULIAN BREW 

1999 Avenue of the Stars 

Suite 1700 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-6048 

(310) 788-1000 (Telephone) 

(310) 788-1200 (Facsimile) 

By: /s/ Julian Brew 

 Julian Brew 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Infineon Technologies, AG and Infineon Technologies 

North America Corporation 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 16 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 17 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

Dated: November 20, 2006 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

DANIEL E. ALBERTI 

3150 Porter Dr. 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

(650) 813-5000 (Telephone) 

(650) 813-5100 (Facsimile) 

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

CRAIG SEEBALD 

BOBBY R. BURCHFIELD 

RICHARD W. SMITH 

600 13th Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20005 

(202) 756-8000 (Telephone) 

(202) 756-8087 (Facsimile)

By: /s/ Craig Seebald 

 Craig Seebald 

 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi America, Ltd.; and Renesas 

Technology America, Inc. f/k/a Hitachi Semiconductor 

(America) Inc. 

Dated: November 20, 2006 THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

ROBERT B. PRINGLE 

PAUL R. GRIFFIN 

JONATHAN E. SCHWARTZ 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

(415) 369-7307 

By: /s/ Paul R. Griffin 

 Paul R. Griffin 

 

Attorneys for Defendants NEC Corporation and NEC 

Electronics America, Inc. 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 17 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 18 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

Dated: November 20, 2006 SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 

GARY L. HALLING 

MONA SOLOUKI 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

(415) 434-9100 (Telephone) 

(415) 434-3947 (Facsimile) 

By: /s/ Mona Solouki 

 Mona Solouki 

Attorneys for Defendant Samsung Electronics 

Company, Ltd. 

Dated: November 20, 2006 LINDQUIST & VENNUM PLLP 

JAMES M. LOCKHART 

JAMES P. MCCARTHY 

4200 IDS Center 

80 South 8th Street 

Minneapolis, MN 55402 

(612) 371-3211 (Telephone)

(612) 371-3207 (Facsimile) 

By: /s/ James P. McCarthy 

 James P. McCarthy 

SELLAR HAZARD MCNEELY & MANNING 

JAMES F. FICENEC 

1111 Civic Drive, Suite 300 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Honeywell International, Inc. 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 18 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 19 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

ATTESTATION

I attest that signatories Albert J. Boro, Jr., Terrence J. Truax, Andrea DeShazo, Na’il 

Benjamin, Steven Morrissett, Harrison J. Frahn, Julian Brew, Craig Seebald, Paul R. 

Griffin, Mona Solouki and James P. McCarthy have concurred in the filing of this 

document. 

Dated: November 20, 2006 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

TERRENCE A. CALLAN 

ALBERT J. BORO, JR. 

RYAN K. TAKEMOTO 

50 Fremont Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

(415) 983-1000 (Telephone) 

(415) 983-1200 (Facsimile) 

By: /s/ Ryan K. Takemoto 

 Ryan K. Takemoto 

Attorneys for Defendants Hynix Semiconductor Inc. 

and Hynix Semiconductor America Inc. 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 19 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 20 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the foregoing is 

hereby SO ORDERED: 

Dated: ________________ 

 ____________________________ 

 Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

 United States District Judge 

11/21/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 20 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700565087v1 - 21 - STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2917 PJH 

EXHIBIT A 

AGREEMENT CONCERNING MATERIAL COVERED BY AN ORDER ENTERED IN 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

The undersigned hereby acknowledges that he or she has read the attached 

STIPULATION AND ORDER entered in the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of California, in the litigation know as HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., ET AL, Case No. C 06-02917 PJH, and 

understands the terms thereof and agrees to be bound by such terms. The undersigned 

further acknowledges and understands that a violation of the Protective Order could be 

punishable as a contempt of court. 

Dated:_______________________ ________________________________ 

 

 _________________________________ 

 [Type or Print Name] 

Case 4:06-cv-02917-PJH Document 87 Filed 11/21/06 Page 21 of 21