Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05186/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05186-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOVELPOSTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAVITCH CANFIELD GROUP, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-05186-WHO 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

On December 4, 2013, defendant Daniel Canfield filed a motion to dismiss. Under Civil 

Local Rule 7-3, the plaintiff had until December 18, 2013, to file any opposition brief. The 

plaintiff has not done so.

The Court ORDERS the plaintiff to show cause why the Complaint should not be 

dismissed as to Mr. Canfield for failure to prosecute by January 9, 2014. If the plaintiff intends to 

oppose the motion to dismiss, the opposition brief shall also be filed by that date. Canfield may 

file a reply brief by January 16, 2014. A hearing on both this Order to Show Cause and the 

motion to dismiss will be set on February 19, 2014. The Court will dismiss Mr. Canfield from this 

action if the plaintiff fails to timely file a response to this Order and the motion to dismiss.

The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Mr. Canfield.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2014

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-05186-WHO Document 20 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 1