Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02453/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02453-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Miguel Garcia, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joe Arpaio,

Defendant, 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-05-2453-PHX-MHM (MEA)

 

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey who has issued a Report and

Recommendation that recommends that the complaint and action should be dismissed without

prejudice. (Doc. 7). Plaintiff has not filed written objections to the Report and

Recommendation. 

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The Court must review the legal analysis in the Report and Recommendation de novo.

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court must review the factual analysis in the Report and

Recommendation de novo for those facts to which objections are filed. "Failure to object to

a magistrate judge's recommendation waives all objections to the judge's findings of fact."

Jones v. Wood, 207 F.3d 557, 562 n.2 (9th Cir. 2000). 

DISCUSSION

The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the complaint and action should be

dismissed without prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. Docket entries

Case 2:05-cv-02453-MHM Document 9 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

dated January 17 and 18, 2006 show that mail sent to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable.

(Doc. 5 & 6). Plaintiff has failed to keep the Court advised of his current address and has

failed to prosecute this case. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc.

7) as the Order of the Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint and action are dismissed without

prejudice.

DATED this 7th day of June, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02453-MHM Document 9 Filed 06/13/06 Page 2 of 2