Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01649/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01649-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DYWRONE BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. YATES, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01649-AWI-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

(Doc. 11)

Plaintiff Dywrone Brown, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 4, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. On May 23, 2008, the court

granted plaintiff a thirty day extension of time to file objections. (Doc. 16). The parties have not

filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

Case 1:06-cv-01649-AWI-DLB Document 17 Filed 07/25/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 4, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust, filed November 28, 2007 is

GRANTED;

3. Plaintiff’s Section 1983 claims are DISMISSED in its entirety, without prejudice, for

failure to exhaust; and 

4. Plaintiff’s state law claims for negligence are DISMISSED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01649-AWI-DLB Document 17 Filed 07/25/08 Page 2 of 2