Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03359/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03359-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

205956_1.DOC -1- Case No: C-06-03359-JF

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC HEARING AND RELATED F.R.C.P. 26(F) DEADLINES

\\voyager\tgurney\Stip to continue CMC.DOC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOSSAMAN, GUTHNER, KNOX & ELLIOTT, LLP

Scott P. DeVries (SBN 088221)

sdevries@nossaman.com

Elaine M. O’Neil (SBN 142234)

eoneil@nossaman.com

Sophie-Nicole Froelich (SBN 213194)

sfroelich@nossaman.com

50 California Street, 34th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4799

Telephone: (415) 398-3600/Fax: (415) 398-2438

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DONG AH TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD.,

a Korean corporation

William S. Klein, Esq. (SBN 121792)

wklein@hopkinscarley.com

Robert A. Christopher (State Bar No. 89035)

rchristopher@hopkinscarley.com

Tod C. Gurney (State Bar No. 199813)

tgurney@hopkinscarley.com

HOPKINS & CARLEY

A Law Corporation

The Letitia Building

70 South First Street

San Jose, CA 95113-2406

Telephone: (408) 286-9800/ Fax: (408) 998-4790

Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff

GLASFORMS, INC., a California corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DONG AH TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD., a

Korean Corporation

Plaintiff,

vs.

GLASFORMS, INC., a California corporation,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: C 06-03359 JF

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE HEARING AND RELATED

F.R.C.P. 26(F) DEADLINES

AND RELATED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

)

)

)

**E-filed 8/31/06**

Case 5:06-cv-03359-JF Document 19 Filed 08/31/06 Page 1 of 4
205956_1.DOC -2- Case No: C-06-03359-JF

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC HEARING AND RELATED F.R.C.P. 26(F) DEADLINES

\\voyager\tgurney\Stip to continue CMC.DOC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 26 and Northern District Civil

Local Rules 7-11 and 16-2(e), Plaintiff Dong Ah Tire & Rubber Co. (“Dong Ah”), and defendant

Glasforms, Inc. (“Glasforms”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on May 22, 2006, Dong Ah filed the above-captioned case and this Court

issued an Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference (“Initial CMC Order”) directing the parties

to, among other things, do the following by August 25, 2006;

(a) complete initial disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26,

(b) file a Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR process or Notice of Need for

ADR Conference; and

(c) appear for a case management conference;

WHEREAS, on May 25, 2006, Dong Ah moved to have the above-captioned case related to the

case titled, Glasforms, Inc. v. CTG International (North America), Inc., Taishan Fiberglass, Inc., et al.,

Case No. 06-00213-JF (the “Glasforms Case”) via an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases

Should be Related (“Administrative Motion”);

WHEREAS, the Court granted Dong Ah’s Administrative Motion on June 21, 2006;

WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a case management conference in the Glasforms Case for

October 6, 2006 at 10:30 a.m.;

WHEREAS, on July 26, 2006, the Court issued an Order (the “July 2006 Order”) moving the

Case Management Conference to September 1, 2006, and directing the parties to file a Joint Case

Management Conference Statement and complete FRCP 26 Initial Disclosures by August 25, 2006;

WHEREAS, on July 26, 2006, Glasforms filed a third-party complaint against CTG International

(North America), Inc., an Indiana Corporation (“CTG”) and Taishan Fiberglass, Inc. (“Taishan”), a

corporation organized under the laws of the People’s Republic of China, in the above-captioned case;

WHEREAS, Glasform’s served CTG with the summons and third-party complaint on or about

August 11, 2006, but to date, CTG has not answered Glasform’s third-party complaint or otherwise

appeared in this case;

WHEREAS, Glasforms has initiated the process of serving the summons and third-party

complaint on Taishan in China, but service has not yet been effected;

Case 5:06-cv-03359-JF Document 19 Filed 08/31/06 Page 2 of 4
205956_1.DOC -3- Case No: C-06-03359-JF

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC HEARING AND RELATED F.R.C.P. 26(F) DEADLINES

\\voyager\tgurney\Stip to continue CMC.DOC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Dong Ah and Glasforms believe that good cause exists for a continuance of the case

management conference in this case to October 6, 2006 at 10:30 a.m., the same date and time on which

the case management conference in the Glasforms case is scheduled, with the related FRCP deadlines

(e.g., initial disclosures and joint case management conference statement) continued accordingly;

WHEREAS, Dong Ah and Glasforms expect that CTG will have answered or otherwise

appeared in this case by October 6, 2006; and

WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, Dong Ah and Glasforms, by and through their respective

undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate that the Initial Case Management Conference and

related dates be continued as follows:

September 15, 2006 Last day to meet and confer regarding initial disclosures, early

settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan.

[FRCP 26(f); N.D. ADR L.R. 3-5]

September 29, 2006 Last day to file/serve Joint Case Management Conference Statement and

FRCP 26(f) discovery plan report. [FRCP 16, N.D. L.R. 16-9]

Last day to file Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR

process or Notice of need for ADR Phone Conference. [N.D. L.R. 16-8]

Last day to complete initial FRCP Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures of relevant

documents and lists of witnesses or state objections in FRCP Rule 26(f)

discovery plan report. [FRCP 26(a)(1)]

October 6, 2006 at

10:30 a.m.

Initial Case Management Conference

[N.D. L.R. 16-10]

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: August 24, 2006 NOSSAMAN, GUTHNER, KNOX & ELLIOTT, LLP

By: _____ /s/___________

ELAINE M. O’NEIL

Attorneys For Plaintiff,

DONG AH TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD., A Korean

Corporation

/ / /

SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

Case 5:06-cv-03359-JF Document 19 Filed 08/31/06 Page 3 of 4
205956_1.DOC -4- Case No: C-06-03359-JF

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC HEARING AND RELATED F.R.C.P. 26(F) DEADLINES

\\voyager\tgurney\Stip to continue CMC.DOC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: August 24, 2006 HOPKINS & CARLEY

By: _____ /s/___________

ROBERT A. CHRISTOPHER

Attorneys For Defendant

GLASFORMS, INC.

Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: _______________ ________________________________

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

8/31/06 JEREMY FOGEL

Case 5:06-cv-03359-JF Document 19 Filed 08/31/06 Page 4 of 4