Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02239/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02239-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STACHA SMITH, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-2239-EFB P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On September 11, 2015, the court found that plaintiff had failed to include a 

certified copy of her trust account statement in support of her application to proceed in forma 

pauperis, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, the court ordered plaintiff to 

submit a certified copy of the statement within thirty days and warned her that failure to do so 

may result in this action being dismissed. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not 

paid submitted a certified copy of her trust account statement or otherwise responded to the 

court’s order.1

///// 

 1

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of her current 

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 

the party is fully effective. 

Case 2:15-cv-02239-TLN-EFB Document 7 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign a United States 

District Judge to this case. 

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: January 7, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-02239-TLN-EFB Document 7 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 2