Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01353/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01353-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 29:626 Job Discrimination (Age)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT JOHNSTON, No. CIV S-09-1353-FCD-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

CITY OF RED BLUFF, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff brings this civil action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

(“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, against the City of Red Bluff and various of its employees. 

On February 18, 2010, the District Judge issued an order adopting the undersigned’s findings and

recommendations and directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff

appealed that order on March 18, 2010. On May 19, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because dismissal of a complaint with leave to

amend is not an appealable order. Because the appeal has been dismissed, jurisdiction returns to

this court which will now set a new deadline for plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff

is cautioned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the entire action. See Local Rule

110.

Case 2:09-cv-01353-CMK Document 32 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended

complaint consistent with the court’s prior orders within 30 days of the date of this order. 

DATED: May 24, 2010

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:09-cv-01353-CMK Document 32 Filed 05/24/10 Page 2 of 2