Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03656/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03656-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

Case No. 14-CV-03656-LHK 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND GRANTING REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

LUXUL TECHNOLOGY INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

NECTARLUX, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-CV-03656-LHK 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND 

GRANTING REQUEST TO EXTEND 

DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

Plaintiff Luxul Technology Inc. (“Luxul”) has one claim for an account stated pending in 

the current litigation. In the parties’ Joint Pretrial Statement, ECF No. 190, Luxul stated that 

“Luxul does not intend to seek any relief;” “Luxul does not intend to present any witnesses at 

trial;” “Luxul does not intend to present any evidence at trial;” and “Luxul does not intend to 

dispute any legal issues at trial.” At the Pretrial Conference on July 7, 2016, the Court ordered the 

parties to file a stipulation of dismissal as to Luxul’s account stated claim or a statement regarding 

Luxul’s position on dismissal by July 13, 2016. ECF No. 198. On July 13, 2016, Luxul’s counsel 

filed a statement stating that “[d]espite numerous calls and emails to Plaintiff’s CEO, we have not 

obtained any authority to sign stipulations on behalf of Plaintiff.” ECF No. 200.

Case 5:14-cv-03656-LHK Document 201 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 14-CV-03656-LHK 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND GRANTING REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Luxul is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why Luxul’s account stated claim 

should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Luxul has until July 22, 2016 to 

file a response to this Order to Show Cause. A hearing on this Order to Show Cause is set for July 

28, 2016 at 4:30 p.m. Luxul’s failure to respond to this Order and to appear at the July 28, 2016 

hearing will result in dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Additionally, in the July 13, 2016 statement filed by Luxul’s counsel, Luxul’s counsel 

requested until August 1, 2016 to file a motion to withdraw as counsel. The Court GRANTS 

Luxul’s counsel’s request. The deadline for Luxul’s counsel to file a motion to withdraw as 

counsel is August 1, 2016.

By July 26, 2016, the parties shall file a status report on Luxul’s bankruptcy petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 18, 2016

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-03656-LHK Document 201 Filed 07/18/16 Page 2 of 2