Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00954/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00954-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODERICK COLEMAN, 

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

LT. ADAM, et al.,

Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 10-0954 CRB (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

On March 5, 2010, while plaintiff was incarcerated at the San Francisco

County Jail, he filed a pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging

various violations of his constitutional rights, including mail tampering and

denial of due process in connection with false disciplinary charges.

Plaintiff has since sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28

U.S.C. § 1915 and filed additional pleadings suggesting that he wishes to allege

additional facts and submit additional documents in support of his claims. Good

cause appearing, plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted and

the complaint is dismissed with leave to amend to incorporate all allegations and

supporting documents (and all defendants) into one complaint within 30 days of

this order. The pleading must be simple and concise and must include the caption

and civil case number used in this order and the words FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT on the first page. Failure to file a proper amended complaint

within the designated time will result in the dismissal of this action.

Case 5:10-cv-00954-LHK Document 5 Filed 07/02/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Plaintiff is advised that the amended complaint will supersede the original

complaint and all other earlier pleadings. Claims and defendants not included in

the first amended complaint will not be considered by the court. See King v.

Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 1, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.10\Coleman, R2.dwlta.wpd

Case 5:10-cv-00954-LHK Document 5 Filed 07/02/10 Page 2 of 2