Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01417/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01417-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARY G. LOPEZ, individually and

as Successor-In-Interest on

behalf of Decedent, SALVADOR V.

LOPEZ; SALVADOR M. LOPEZ,

individually and as SuccessorIn-Interest on behalf of

Decedent, SALVADOR V. LOPEZ;

OSVALDO RENE LOPEZ, a minor, by

and through Guardian ad Litem,

MARY G. LOPEZ; TOMMY GREGORY

LOPEZ, a minor, by and through

Guardian ad Litem, MARY G.

LOPEZ; and MEGHIN LEANNE LOPEZ,

a minor, by and through Guardian

ad Litem, MARY G. LOPEZ,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY; NATIONAL

RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION

(AMTRAK); STATE OF CALIFORNIA;

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS);

COUNTY OF KERN; CITY OF DELANO;

CITY OF McFARLAND; CITY OF

WASCO; and DOES 1 through 200,

inclusive,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:07-cv-1417 OWW GSA

ORDER AFTER SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE 

Further Scheduling

Conference: 5/2/08 8:15

Ctrm. 3

I. Date of Scheduling Conference.

January 17, 2008.

Case 1:07-cv-01417-OWW -GSA Document 28 Filed 01/22/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

II. Appearances Of Counsel.

McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP by Juan C. Victoria, Esq.,

appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs.

Lumbardi, Loper & Conant, LLP by Clyde Hutchinson, Esq.,

appeared on behalf of Defendant National Railroad Passenger

Corporation and BNSF Railway Company. 

John Hoxie, Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendants The State

of California and Department of Transportation. 

Mark Nations, Esq., Kern County Counsel, appeared on behalf

of Defendant the County of Kern.

III. Status of Case. 

1. Plaintiffs’ counsel has advised the Court and all

Defendants that it is the intention of Plaintiffs to seek new

counsel. Accordingly, 90 to 100 days have been requested for new

counsel to be located and to be substituted into the case. 

2. Plaintiffs’ counsel further stated that he has been

authorized by his clients to dismiss Defendants City of Delano,

City of McFarland, and City of Wasco. Dismissal papers will be

filed on or before February 1, 2008. 

3. No Defendant has objected to the requested continuance

of this Scheduling Conference. Accordingly, this Scheduling

Conference is continued to May 2, 2008, at 8:15 a.m. The parties

are authorized to appear telephonically. 

4. Any new counsel for Plaintiffs shall enter their

appearances on or before April 22, 2008. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

Case 1:07-cv-01417-OWW -GSA Document 28 Filed 01/22/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01417-OWW -GSA Document 28 Filed 01/22/08 Page 3 of 3