Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00981/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00981-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK MUNNS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CRESCENT SECURITY GROUP, 

INC., et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:09-cv-00981-MCE-EFB

ORDER

By way of this Court’s Order filed November 10, 2015, Plaintiffs were directed to 

file a status report advising the Court whether they intend to prosecute this case and, if 

so, the status of service on Defendants. ECF No. 17. Plaintiffs were also warned that 

“[f]ailure to respond to [that] Order [would] result in dismissal of this action with prejudice 

upon no further notice to the parties.” Id. No response has been received. 

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:09-cv-00981-MCE-EFB Document 18 Filed 12/01/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice for noncompliance 

with the local rules and/or court orders, failure to prosecute pursuant to this Court's 

inherent authority to control its docket, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The 

Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 30, 2015

Case 2:09-cv-00981-MCE-EFB Document 18 Filed 12/01/15 Page 2 of 2