Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-04086/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-04086-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

W02-WEST:5JMC1\400078187.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUBMISSION OF MOTIONS 

AND HEARING DATE—CASE NO. C 02-04086 JF (RS)

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLP 

JAMES M. CHADWICK Cal. Bar No. 157114 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4106 

Tel: 415.434.9100 

Fax: 415.434.3947 

jchadwick@sheppardmullin.com 

DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP 

DIANA NG FUNG Cal. Bar No. 185175

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2248 

Tel: 650.833.2000 

Fax: 650.833.2001 

diana.ng.fung@dlapiper.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

HORTA, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

HORTA, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF SAN JOSE, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 02-04086 JF (RS) 

[Related Case Nos. C 00-20018 JF 

and C 05-03778 JF] 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING SUBMISSION OF MOTIONS AND 

CONTINUING HEARING ON HORTA, LLC’S 

MOTION TO RECONSIDER, REOPEN, AND 

AMEND JUDGMENT 

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

Complaint: August 23, 2002 

**E-filed 9/28/06

Case 5:02-cv-04086-JF Document 267 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2-

W02-WEST:5JMC1\400078187.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUBMISSION OF MOTIONS 

AND HEARING DATE—CASE NO. C 02-04086 JF (RS)

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, on February 28, 2005, the Court entered judgment in this action brought by 

Horta against the City of San Jose (the “San Jose Action”); 

WHEREAS, on March 14, 2005, plaintiff Horta, LLC (“Horta”) filed its Motion to 

Reconsider, Reopen, and Amend Judgment (the “Motion to Amend”) and set it for hearing on 

May 6, 2005; 

WHEREAS, on May 6, 2005, the Court continued the hearing on the Motion to Amend to 

August 5, 2005 to permit Horta to conduct additional discovery relating to issues presented in the 

Motion to Amend; 

WHEREAS, Horta has filed a separate action to enforce its right to the requested 

discovery from the Federal Aviation Administration in the related case Horta, LLC v. Federal 

Aviation Administration, et al., United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case 

No. C 05-03778 JF (the “FAA Action”); 

WHEREAS, on October 27, 2005, Horta filed a motion for summary judgment in the FAA 

Action to compel the FAA to provide complete responses to Horta’s discovery requests and to 

provide the requested deposition testimony; 

WHEREAS, the Court took the FAA’s motion to quash and Horta’s motion for summary 

judgment under submission at the close of the December 16, 2005 combined hearing on the 

motions and has not yet ruled on them; 

WHEREAS, the parties have previously stipulated to and the Court has ordered a number 

of continuances of the hearing date for Motion to Amend; 

WHEREAS, there is currently a need to determine whether and in what form the FAA 

may issue a letter of deviation authority for operations of Horta’s Boeing 727 for the purposes of 

transporting the San Jose SaberCats; 

WHEREAS, if the discussions between Horta and the FAA fail to resolve the issues 

presented by Horta’s motion for summary judgment and the FAA’s motion to quash, Horta 

contends that it requires additional time to complete discovery pertaining to the issues raised in 

the Motion to Amend, and to submit additional briefing on that motion; 

Case 5:02-cv-04086-JF Document 267 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 4
wU AS, Horta and the City of San lose (the "City'} agree that:

(i) Iiom and the defendants in the FWA Action should be granted until October 11"J,

2006 to file arty additional bri a ft is the FAA .roc OO, and that upon the filixRg of any addi dcr, tai.

4 1 bri.ft& the matter will be deemed submitted and the Cotut win rule on the pending moti ^mi it e

n,

6 .(2) Horta and the City should be granted mtil November 20, 2006 to submit amy

7 additiomal briefing on Hotta's motion to =end the judgment (to be limited, to no mom th w

9 (3) The October 6, 2006 hearuag on the motion to Amend in the San Jose Act,

10 should be, confued to Decexnber 1, 2006.

11 'SHEMOF.E, IT 10 HEM'Y STIPULATED by and between the pies to this ar:i is It,,

Pages); and

(2) the October 6, 2006 hearing an the Motion to Amend in the San Jdse Act !t».

17 1 should be continued to Decex ber 1, 200+6,

bier ('&, 2006 SHEPPARD MLTI:.UNRI HT . & H.AWTON L112

RICHARD DO A

-3.

STE''C UTION AND [PROPOSED) ORDER RE MNCSSION ":NS

ANI) IW;6A= 3 DATS-.CAUSE NO. C 02-?Q':1; 6 r? :k5)

8

(1) Hotta and the City should be granted until November 20, 2006 to submit my

4 1 additional, briefing on Hortes motion to emend the judgment (to be If nited to no more than;

C

Case 5:02-cv-04086-JF Document 267 Filed 09/28/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-4-

W02-WEST:5JMC1\400078187.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUBMISSION OF MOTIONS 

AND HEARING DATE—CASE NO. C 02-04086 JF (RS) 

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

(1) Horta and the City are granted until November 20, 2006 to submit any additional 

briefing on Horta’s motion to amend the judgment (to be limited to no more than fifteen pages); 

and 

(2) the October 6, 2006 hearing on the Motion to Amend in this case is continued to 

December 1, 2006, at 9:00 a.m., in the courtroom of the Honorable Jeremy Fogel, located at 280 

South First Street, San Jose, California. 

Dated: September ____, 2006 

HON. JEREMY FOGEL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

28

Case 5:02-cv-04086-JF Document 267 Filed 09/28/06 Page 4 of 4