Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00247/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00247-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REVISED STIPULATION ON SPECIFIED DISCOVERY MATTERS

William A. Markham, State Bar No. 132970

MALDONADO & MARKHAM, LLP

402 West Broadway, 24 Floor th

San Diego, CA 92101

Tel: (619) 221-4400

Fax: (619) 224-3974

E-mail: wm@maldonadomarkham.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JENSEN ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

Vs.

OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC.,

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE

COMPANY; AT&T SERVICES,

INC.; and NEVADA BELL

TELEPHONE COMPANY,

Defendants.

) Case No. C 06-0247 SI (JCS)

)

)

) REVISED STIPULATION ON

) SPECIFIED DISCOVERY MATTERS

)

) 

)

)

)

)

) 

) The Hon. Susan Illston

)

) Complaint Filed: January 12, 2006

) Trial Date: November 3, 2008

) 

)

This stipulation (the “Stipulation”) is made by all the parties to this case, who are as

follows: Jensen Enterprises, Inc. (“Jensen”), Oldcastle Precast, Inc. (“Oldcastle”), and

Defendants Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, and AT&T

Services, Inc. (collectively, “AT&T”).

Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 257 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 1 of 5 Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 258 Filed 11/27/07 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REVISED STIPULATION ON SPECIFIED DISCOVERY MATTERS -2-

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred at length about various pending

discovery matters and discovery deadlines; and

WHEREAS, they have agreed to the below-listed items, to which they now formally

stipulate;

WHEREFORE, Jensen, Oldcastle and AT&T now formally assent and stipulate to the

following terms and conditions:

STIPULATED TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Jensen has already produced its designated expert on market definitions,

Professor Robert Hall, for a deposition in Menlo Park, California on October 23, 2007. The

deposition began at approximately 9:15 a.m. and was adjourned at approximately 6:20 p.m.,

but with a two-hour recess at midday so that Professor Hall could participate in a seminar at

Stanford University. The deposition was adjourned at the close of the day, and will be

reconvened at 8:00 a.m. in Menlo Park, California at the offices of Analysis Group, Inc. at

1010 El Camino Real, Suite 310 Menlo Park, California 94025. 

2. The parties agree that each deposition, including that of Professor Hall, may be

conducted for seven hours, excluding any recesses, and that at the close of the seven-hour

period the parties shall meet and confer in good faith to determine whether any examining

party reasonably requires additional time to complete the examination, and, if so, how much

time.

3. Defendants’ deadline for expert disclosures on market definitions under Rule

26 (a) (2) shall be postponed from October 22, 2007 to November 15, 2007. Jensen will not

stipulate to any further extensions of this deadline.

4. The parties’ deadline for making rebuttal disclosures on market definitions

under Rule 26 (a) (2) shall be postponed from November 16, 2007 to December 10, 2007. 

Jensen will not stipulate to any further extensions of this deadline, save if the deadline for

percipient discovery is extended by the same amount of time.

5. The cut-off discovery date for market definition expert discovery shall be

postponed from December 14, 2007 to January 7, 2008. Jensen will not stipulate to any

Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 257 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 2 of 5 Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 258 Filed 11/27/07 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REVISED STIPULATION ON SPECIFIED DISCOVERY MATTERS -3-

further extensions of this deadline, save if the deadline for percipient discovery is extended

by the same amount of time.

6. Each party will make its designated expert witness or witnesses available for

deposition pursuant to a deposition notice served by any other party without the need for a

subpoena, including producing documents requested in the deposition notice.

7. If a party's designated expert on market definition is deposed in connection

with market definition discovery, and the designating party subsequently designates the same

expert on another issue, the designating party will make the expert available for a second

deposition, without requiring that any other party first obtain leave of court pursuant to Rule

30(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

8. Jensen served on AT&T an amended notice of deposition under Rule 30 (b) (6)

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Jensen’s Notice”). This notice lists twenty-seven

deposition topics in this Notice. AT&T now designates the following witnesses to testify on

its behalf as to the following topics: 

Deposition Topic No. AT&T’s Designated Witness

1. Melissa Stanton

2. Melissa Stanton

3. Robert Nolasco

4. Melissa Stanton

5. Melissa Stanton

6. Melissa Stanton

7. Robert Nolasco

8. Melissa Stanton

9. Melissa Stanton

10. Robert Nolasco

11. Ray Kozul, Nancy Marinello

12. Robert Nolasco

13. Robert Nolasco

Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 257 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 3 of 5 Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 258 Filed 11/27/07 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REVISED STIPULATION ON SPECIFIED DISCOVERY MATTERS -4-

14. Robert Nolasco

15. Robert Nolasco

16. Robert Nolasco

17. Robert Nolasco

18. Ray Kozul, Nancy Marinello

19. Ray Kozul, Nancy Marinello

20. Ray Kozul, Nancy Marinello

21. AT&T has no information on topic

22. Robert Nolasco

23. AT&T has no information on topic

24. AT&T objects: Expert topic only

25. AT&T objects: Expert topic only

26. Robert Nolasco

27. Robert Nolasco

8. AT&T has designated Melissa Stanton as its witness for Deposition Topic No.

1 in Jensen’s Notice. The parties agree that Jensen shall depose Melissa Stanton under Rule

30 (b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on November 6, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. in the

offices of Maldonado & Markham, LLP, 402 West Broadway, 24 Floor, San Diego, CA th

92101. Jensen will depose this witness as to all Deposition Topics for which she has been

designated, including Deposition Topic No. 1. If the witness is designated for many topics,

Jensen might find that it is not practicable to depose the witness as to all the designated

topics within seven hours. The present stipulation does not resolve any disagreement that the

parties might have over this last point, as to which each party preserves all of its rights and

//

//

//

//

//

Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 257 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 4 of 5 Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 258 Filed 11/27/07 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REVISED STIPULATION ON SPECIFIED DISCOVERY MATTERS -5-

prerogatives. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: October 31, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

AT&T WEST LEGAL DEPARTMENT

 By: 

Raymond P. Bolaños, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants PACIFIC BELL

TELEPHONE COMPANY, NEVADA BELL

TELEPHONE COMPANY, AND AT&T

SERVICES, INC. 

DATED: October 31, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

FOLGER LEVIN & KAHN, LLP

 By: 

Beatrice B. Nguyen,

Attorneys for Defendant, OLDCASTLE

PRECAST, INC.

DATED: October 31, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

MALDONADO & MARKHAM, LLP

/s/

 By: 

William A. Markham,

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

JENSEN ENTERPRISES, INC.

Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 257 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 5 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Susan Illston

Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 258 Filed 11/27/07 Page 5 of 5