Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00098/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00098-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:183 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSPENDING 

DISCOVERY SCHEDULE IN LIGHT OF PENDING SETTLEMENT 

Case No. Cv-05-00098-VRW

001006-0003-10687-NY02.2615172.1 08/08/2007 6:25 PM

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

Jeffrey E. Ostrow (CSB No. 213118)

2550 Hanover Street

Palo Alto, California 94304

Telephone: (650) 251-5000

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002

E-mail: jostrow@stblaw.com

Henry B. Gutman (admitted pro hac vice)

Kerry L. Konrad (admitted pro hac vice)

Victor Cole (admitted pro hac vice)

425 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10017-3954

Telephone: (212) 455-2000

Facsimile: (212) 455-2502

E-mail: hgutman@stblaw.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

David M. Barkan (CSB No. 160825)

500 Arguello St., Suite 500

Redwood City, CA 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Email: barkan@fr.com

Joseph V. Colaianni (admitted pro hac vice)

Ralph A. Phillips (admitted pro hac vice)

1425 K Street, N.W., Suite 1100

Washington D.C., 20005

Telephone: (202) 783-5070

Facsimile: (202) 783-2331

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

3COM CORPORATION,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,

v.

D-LINK SYSTEMS INC.,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff.

Case No. Cv-05-00098-VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SUSPENDING DISCOVERY SCHEDULE 

IN LIGHT OF PENDING SETTLEMENT 

WHEREAS, the parties in the above-captioned action have reached an agreement-inprinciple to settle all of their outstanding claims and counterclaims in this action, and anticipate 

Case 3:05-cv-00098-VRW Document 249 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:05-cv-00098-VRW Document 250 Filed 08/13/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSPENDING 

DISCOVERY SCHEDULE IN LIGHT OF PENDING SETTLEMENT 

Case No. Cv-05-00098-VRW

001006-0003-10687-NY02.2615172.1 08/08/2007 6:25 PM

the prompt preparation and execution of a definitive settlement agreement according to the 

agreed-upon terms;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s order dated June 22, 2007, the parties were to 

exchange rebuttal expert reports on August 8, 2007;

WHEREAS, the parties have served various discovery requests upon each other and 

certain non-parties, which are pending;

WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid undue cost and expense in connection with further 

submissions and compliance with discovery demands pending settlement of this action;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE and respectfully

request the Court to order as follows:

1. The exchange of rebuttal expert reports, and the parties’ responses to all pending 

discovery requests, shall be adjourned to enable the parties to consummate their contemplated 

settlement;

2. If the parties are unable to execute a mutually satisfactory settlement agreement 

within thirty (30) days, within two weeks thereafter the parties shall meet and confer and present 

to the Court a proposed revised schedule for the completion of discovery in this case.

Dated: August 8, 2007

By: /s/ Kerry L. Konrad

Kerry L. Konrad

(pro hac vice)

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

3COM CORPORATION

By: /s/ David M. Barkan

David M. Barkan

(State Bar No. 160825)

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff

D-LINK SYSTEMS, INC. 

Case 3:05-cv-00098-VRW Document 249 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:05-cv-00098-VRW Document 250 Filed 08/13/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSPENDING 

DISCOVERY SCHEDULE IN LIGHT OF PENDING SETTLEMENT 

Case No. Cv-05-00098-VRW

001006-0003-10687-NY02.2615172.1 08/08/2007 6:25 PM

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from David 

M. Barkan.

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

By: /s/ Kerry L. Konrad

Kerry L. Konrad

(pro hac vice)

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

3COM CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________, 2007 _________________________

Honorable Vaughn R. Walker

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00098-VRW Document 249 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 3 of 3

August 13

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:05-cv-00098-VRW Document 250 Filed 08/13/07 Page 3 of 3