Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00054/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00054-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

JAN E. KRUSKA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PERVERTED JUSTICE

FOUNDATION INCORPORATED, et.

al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-0054-PHX-SMM

ORDER

 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Judicial Notice/Motion to Compel (Doc. 171). In

her Motion to Compel, Plaintiff asks the Court to compel Defendants to submit their

Initial Disclosure Statements. Plaintiff indicates that she served her Initial Disclosure

Statement to Defendants on July 14, 2009. However, defense counsel has indicated that

they are waiting for their respective motions to dismiss to be addressed by the Court

before serving their Initial Disclosure Statements. Plaintiff subsequently filed her Notice

of Initial Disclosure with the Court (Doc. 173).

The Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion at this time. There are two motions to

dismiss still pending, one filed by Defendants Perverted Justice Foundation (Doc. 147) 

and Xavier Von Erck, and another filed by Defendant Christopher Brochious (Doc. 141). 

Once these motions are resolved by the Court, a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference will be

held. In the Court’s Order setting the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, the Court will

specify when Initial Disclosure Statements must be filed. 

Case 2:08-cv-00054-SMM Document 174 Filed 07/20/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING Plaintiff’s Judicial Notice/Motion to

Compel (Doc. 171).

DATED this 18th day of July, 2009.

Case 2:08-cv-00054-SMM Document 174 Filed 07/20/09 Page 2 of 2