Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01741/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01741-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SELOMI VILLALTA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

EOIR, PRINT MAGGARD, USCIS, AND

EMILIA BARDINE

Defendants. /

No. C 16-01741 WHA

ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA

PAUPERIS STATUS

In this closed immigration action, pro se plaintiff appealed an order dismissing the

action. Our court of appeals referred the matter to this Court for a determination as to whether

plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. This order determines that it

should not. There are no valid grounds on which an appeal can be based. Consequently, this

order certifies that any appeal taken from the order of dismissal and judgment of this action will

not be taken in good faith and is therefore frivolous. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A); Ellis v.

United States, 356 U.S. 674, 674– 75 (1958); Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091,

1092 (9th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is hereby REVOKED. 

The 

Clerk shall notify plaintiff and the Court of Appeals of this order. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

Case 3:16-cv-01741-WHA Document 21 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 1