Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00296/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00296-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD GARCIA, No. CIV S-07-0296-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial

review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On

January 8, 2008, the court signed an order remanding this case to the Commissioner of Social

Security for further proceedings based on the parties’ stipulation. Judgment was entered

accordingly. 

A review of the docket reflects that defendant has notified the court regarding

consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, however, has not notified the court

regarding consent. Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order and Eastern District of California

Local Rules, Appendix A, the time to do so has now expired. 

Case 2:07-cv-00296-CMK Document 28 Filed 01/11/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The order of remand (Doc. 26) and judgment (Doc. 27) will be vacated under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a). The undersigned had no jurisdiction to enter final

judgment because all parties have not consented. Plaintiff will be required to show cause

regarding her failure to comply with the local rules. Plaintiff is advised that the submission of

proper notification regarding consent will be considered an adequate response to this order to

show cause. Plaintiff will be forwarded a copy of the court’s form regarding consent. Finally,

plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action. 

See Local Rule 11-110. Once the court is notified regarding consent, the stipulation for remand

can then be dealt with properly.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Order of Remand (Doc. 26) and the Judgment (Doc. 27) are hereby

vacated;

2. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 20 days from the date of

service of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure

to comply with court rules and orders; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on plaintiff a copy of the court’s

form entitled “Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment.”

DATED: January 10, 2008

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00296-CMK Document 28 Filed 01/11/08 Page 2 of 2