Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02516/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02516-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 10cv2516

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD GREEN,

Petitioner,

CASE NO. 10-CV-2516 JLS (JMA)

ORDER: SUA SPONTE

(1) VACATING ORDER

ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION;

(2) VACATING JUDGMENT; AND

(3) EXTENDING TIME TO REPLY

TO OBJECTIONS

vs.

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF

PAROLE HEARINGS; MATTHEW CATE,

Respondents.

On July 25, 2011, Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler filed a report and recommendation advising

this Court to grant Respondent Matthew Cate’s motion to dismiss and dismiss Petitioner’s habeas

corpus petition without prejudice to Petitioner bringing his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No.

16.) Magistrate Judge Adler ordered the parties to file any objections to the R&R “not later than

August 16, 2011.” (Id. at 6.) On August 29, 2011, having received no objections, the Court adopted

Magistrate Judge Adler’s R&R, granted Respondent’s motion to dismiss, and dismissed Petitioner’s

habeas petition without prejudice to Petitioner bringing his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No.

18.) Subsequent to the issuance of that Order, the Court received Petitioner’s objections to the R&R.

(ECF No. 21.) Under the prisoner mailbox rule, see Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1106 n.2 (9th Cir.

1999), the objections are timely (see ECF No. 21, at 4 (objections mailed on August 16, 2011)).

Accordingly, the Court accepted them nunc pro tunc to August 22, 2011. (ECF Nos. 20, 21.)

//

Case 3:10-cv-02516-JLS-JMA Document 22 Filed 09/02/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 10cv2516

Having accepted Petitioner’s timely objections, the Court HEREBY VACATES (1) its August

29, 2011 Order adopting Magistrate Judge Adler’s R&R, granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss,

and dismissing Petitioner’s habeas petition (ECF No. 18); and (2) the associated judgment (ECF No.

19). Respondent may reply to Petitioner’s objections within ten days from the date that this Order is

electronically docketed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 2, 2011

Honorable Janis L. Sammartino

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-02516-JLS-JMA Document 22 Filed 09/02/11 Page 2 of 2