Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01411/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01411-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

-1- ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION TO FILE 

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DUHN OIL TOOL, INC., 

Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, 

vs. 

COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION, 

Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff. 

Case No. 1:05-cv-01411-OWW-GSA 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN 

SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT COOPER 

CAMERON CORPORATION’S 

RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO 

PLAINTIFF DUHN OIL TOOL, INC.’S EX 

PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO 

INFRINGEMENT REGARDING 

DEFENDANT’S PATENT PENDING AND

NEW STYLE DESIGNS 

Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 

Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to allow Defendant Cooper 

Cameron Corporation (“Cameron”) to file documents under seal in support of Its Response 

in Opposition to Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. (“Duhn Oil”)’s Ex Parte Application to Strike 

Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Infringement Regarding 

Defendant’s Patent Pending and New Style Designs (Docket No. 154). 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-01411-MLH-GSA Document 163 Filed 10/25/07 Page 1 of 3
-2- ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION TO FILE 

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties jointly request that Defendant Cameron be allowed to file the following 

documents under seal. 

A. Expert Report of J. Duross O’Bryan, dated June 29, 2007 (filed under seal 

because Report designated as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the Protective 

Order (Docket No. 37)). 

B. Expert Report of Dr. Alan Ratliff, dated June 29, 2007 (filed under seal 

because Report designated as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the Protective 

Order (Docket No. 37)). 

C. Supplemental and Rebuttal Expert Report of J. Duross O’Bryan, dated July 

27, 2007 (filed under seal because Report designated as “Attorneys’ Eyes 

Only” under the Protective Order (Docket No. 37)). 

D. Expert Rebuttal Report of Dr. Alan Ratliff, dated July 26, 2007 (filed under 

seal because Report designated as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the 

Protective Order (Docket No. 37)). 

Defendant will be filing these documents under seal pursuant to Section III.(L) of 

the Protective Order, which provides that “[a]ll information designated as Confidential 

Information which is filed or lodged with the court, or any pleading or memorandum 

purporting to reproduce or paraphrase such information, shall be filed or lodged in sealed 

containers . . ..” 

The documents are the reports of the parties’ damages experts, which are documents 

designated as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the Protective Order. These expert reports are 

being filed under seal as Exhibits A-D to Defendant Cameron’s Response in Opposition to 

Plaintiff Duhn Oil’s Ex Parte Application to Strike Defendant’s Motion for Partial 

Summary Judgment of No Infringement Regarding Defendant’s Patent Pending and New 

Style Designs (Docket No. 154). 

This Court finds that the Stipulation should be and is hereby GRANTED. 

Accordingly, Pursuant to Local Rule 39-141(a), and the Court’s Protective Order 

entered August 11, 2006 (Docket No. 37) (Section III.(L) Filing Documents With The 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-01411-MLH-GSA Document 163 Filed 10/25/07 Page 2 of 3
-3- ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION TO FILE 

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Court), Defendant Cameron is authorized to file the above-referenced documents under seal 

as Exhibits A-D to Defendant Cameron’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff Duhn Oil’s 

Ex Parte Application to Strike Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No 

Infringement Regarding Defendant’s Patent Pending and New Style Designs (Docket No. 

154). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 24, 2007 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER 

HON. OLIVER W. WANGER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-01411-MLH-GSA Document 163 Filed 10/25/07 Page 3 of 3