Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00063/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00063-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

JACOB TELLEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COUNTY OF MERCED, MERCED 

COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; 

CHARLES HALE, ERICK MACIAS and 

JOSE SAM SANCHEZ individually and as 

officers of the MERCED COUNTY 

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, and DOES 1-

100,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00063-DAD-SAB

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ 

APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS 

UNDER SEAL 

(Doc. 10)

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The Court, after reviewing, Defendants COUNTY OF MERCED, COUNTY OF 

MERCED SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT erroneously sued and served as Merced County Sheriff 

Department, CHARLES HALE, and JOSE SAM SANCHEZ’s Application to File Documents 

Under Seal, hereby rules as follows:

1. Defendants’ Application to File Under Seal Exhibit “B” to Defendants’ Request for 

Judicial Notice filed in connection with Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, and pertinent pages of the 

Case 1:16-cv-00063-DAD-SAB Document 17 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Motion to Dismiss IS GRANTED. The following documents are ordered to be filed under seal at 

this :

a. Reporter’s Transcript dated November 14, 2014, filed as Exhibit “B” to 

Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice in support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; 

b. Pertinent portions of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss which discuss the 

contents of the Reporter’s Transcript.

c. The sealed documents are Bate-Stamped 001-0015.

Persons to be permitted access to the documents include the parties to the action, their 

counsel, this Court, and this Court’s personnel as needed. This order is specifically subject to 

reconsideration either on motion of any interested party or on the court’s own motion with respect 

to the continuing need for sealing during the pendency of this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00063-DAD-SAB Document 17 Filed 03/16/16 Page 2 of 2