Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01819/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01819-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD COLE, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

M. SPAETH, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-01819-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 8)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Doc. 7)

Plaintiff, Donald Cole (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking

relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 24, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that recommended Plaintiff’s motion for

preliminary injunctive relief be denied. The Findings and

Recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice to

plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations

were to be filed on or before February 20, 2007. 

To date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the

Case 1:06-cv-01819-AWI-DLB Document 17 Filed 04/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations. The court notes

that on March 23, 2007, plaintiff filed another motion for

preliminary injunctive relief. However, this document appears

to be a new motion and not objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations on the prior motion.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 24,

2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief,

filed January 18, 2007, is DENIED, without prejudice, as

PREMATURE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 11, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01819-AWI-DLB Document 17 Filed 04/12/07 Page 2 of 2