Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02711/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02711-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID REYES,

Plaintiff,

v.

A. YOUNG, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-2711 KJM CKD P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed August 12, 2015, plaintiff was granted a final extension of time to file an 

amended complaint pursuant to the June 12, 2015 order. (ECF No. 20.) The September 28, 2015 

deadline has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 

responded to the court’s order. Thus the undersigned will recommend dismissal of this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

/////

/////

Case 2:14-cv-02711-JAM-CKD Document 21 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: October 6, 2015

2/reye2711.fta(2)

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-02711-JAM-CKD Document 21 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 2