Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00590/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00590-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GIL CROSTHWAITE, et al.,

Plaintiffs

 v.

CELIK ENGINEERING CORPORATION, et

al.,

Defendants /

No. C 05-0590 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On March 21, 2006, plaintiffs electronically filed a Motion to Continue Trial Date by

60 Days and a supporting declaration. Plaintiffs have violated General Order 45 and the

Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than

noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one

paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and .

. . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” 

See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

documents. Plaintiffs are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply with the

Court’s Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Case 3:05-cv-00590-MMC Document 23 Filed 03/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00590-MMC Document 23 Filed 03/27/06 Page 2 of 2