Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01271/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01271-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

Page 1

Stipulation Re Consolidated Reply

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

MAYALL HURLEY

A Professional Corporation

2453 Grand Canal Boulevard, Second Floor

Stockton, California 95207-8253

Telephone (209) 477-3833

J. ANTHONY ABBOTT, ESQ.

CA State Bar No. 083975

JOHANNE C. MEDINA, ESQ.

CA State Bar No. 258973

Attorneys for Defendants, 

TUOLUMNE FIRE DISTRICT, JOSEPH TURNER,

DARLENE HUTCHINS, KENNETH HOCKETT, 

And BRIAN MACHADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT

BENJAMIN C. OYARZO AND NICHOLAS 

HART,

Plaintiff,

vs.

TUOLUMNE FIRE DISTRICT (A.K.A. 

“TUOLUMNE FIRE PROTECTION 

DISTRICT”), JOSEPH TURNER, in his 

individual and official capacities, 

KENNETH HOCKETT, in his individual 

and official capacities, DARLENE 

HUTCHINS, in her individual and official 

capacities, , BRIAN MACHADO, in his 

individual and official capacities, TONEY 

POWERS, in his official and official 

capacities, and DOES 1 through 20, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: 1:11-cv-01271-LJO-SAB

STIPULATION RE CONSOLIDATION 

OF DEFENDANT TUOLUMNE FIRE 

DISTRICTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ 

CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION TO 

DEFENDANT TUOLUMNE FIRE 

DISTRICTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, 

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; 

ORDER

It is hereby stipulated between defendant, Tuolumne Fire District (TFD), by and through 

its attorney, J. Anthony Abbott and plaintiffs, Benjamin Oyarzo (OYARZO) and Nicholas Hart 

(HART), by and through their attorney, Shannon Seibert, that defendant TFD will file a 

Consolidated Reply not to exceed 25 pages to plaintiffs, OYARZO and HART’s Consolidated 

Opposition to TFD’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or Alternatively, Partial Summary 

Judgment. 

Case 1:11-cv-01271-SAB Document 93 Filed 05/29/13 Page 1 of 2
Page 2

Stipulation Re Consolidated Reply

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD:

DATED: May 28, 2013 SEIBERT & BAUTISTA

By__/s/ Shannon Seibert____________________

SHANNON SEIBERT, Attorney for Plaintffs

DATED: May 28, 2013 MAYALL HURLEY, P.C.

By____/s/ J. Anthony Abbott______________

J. ANTHONY ABBOTT, Attorney for Defendants

ORDER

The stipulation of the parties having been considered, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS ORDERED.

DATED: May 28, 2013

Lawrence J. O’Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01271-SAB Document 93 Filed 05/29/13 Page 2 of 2