Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01170/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01170-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CARL CLAYVON CURRY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ADULT CORRECTIONAL HEALTH, et 

al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:23-cv-01170 AC P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 On June 23, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and 

a certified copy of his prison trust account statement, and he was cautioned that failure to do so 

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 4. On July 5, 2023, the 

court’s order was returned to the court as undeliverable. 

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 

the party is fully effective. 

 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is 

directed to assign a District Judge to this case. 

//// 

//// 

Case 2:23-cv-01170-DC-AC Document 6 Filed 09/12/23 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice 

for failure to prosecute. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: September 12, 2023. 

Case 2:23-cv-01170-DC-AC Document 6 Filed 09/12/23 Page 2 of 2