Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01558/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01558-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HILTON LAWRENCE BROWN,

Plaintiff, 2:06-cv-1558-GEB-DAD-P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 27, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed a

document titled “Objections to File Suite.”

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:06-cv-01558-GEB-DAD Document 12 Filed 01/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has also filed a request for an extension of time to appeal the magistrate

judge’s November 27, 2006 order denying plaintiff’s October 2, 2006 request for transcript. The

docket does not reflect that a transcript has been filed in this case. Plaintiff’s request will be

denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s December 21, 2006 request for extension of time is denied;

2. The findings and recommendations filed November 27, 2006, are adopted in

full; and

3. This action is dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a paid action. 

Dated: January 5, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01558-GEB-DAD Document 12 Filed 01/05/07 Page 2 of 2