Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01273/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01273-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

C:\Windows\Temp\notes101AA1\stip concerning documents.doc 1 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION CONCERNING DOCUMENTS MARKED CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Clark Stanton #60374 

Thomas R. Burke #141930 

Gwen Fanger #191161 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 276-6500 

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 

Email: clarkstanton@dwt.com

 thomasburke@dwt.com

 gwenfanger@dwt.com

William C. Hahesy, #105743 

LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY

225 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 105 

Fresno, CA 93704 

Telephone (559) 579-1230 

Facsimile (559) 579-1231 

Email: bill@hahesylaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant, CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PERINATAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., 

KRISHNAKUMAR RAJANI, M.D., and 

STEPHEN ELLIOT, M.D. 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL CENTRAL 

CALIFORNIA,INC., a California 

Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No.1:09-CV-01273 LJO SMS 

STIPULATION CONCERNING 

DOCUMENTS MARKED 

CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY’S 

EYES ONLY AND ORDER 

THEREON 

STIPULATION

1. The parties have entered into a Stipulated Protective Order that was filed after 

signature by this Court on January 11, 2010. 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-01273-LJO -MJS Document 47 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 4
C:\Windows\Temp\notes101AA1\stip concerning documents.doc 2 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION CONCERNING DOCUMENTS MARKED CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. In connection with discovery in this case, the Plaintiff has produced to 

Defendant Children’s Hospital Central California certain documents marked “PMG0334-

1339”, all of which have been marked “attorney’s eyes only.” 

3. Defendant Children’s Hospital Central California disputes this designation. 

4. In an attempt to resolve this dispute informally, the parties agreed that 

compilations and summaries relating to those documents prepared either by counsel or others 

retained by counsel (so long as not employed by Defendant Children’s Hospital Central 

California or other defendants), could be shared with the Hospital’s CEO, CFO Todd 

Suntrapak, in-house counsel, Mr. Richard Wolf, and insurance representatives, so long as those 

persons agreed that such information would not be shared with others unless the persons are 

those who are identified in Section 7 of the Stipulated Protective Order. 

5. The parties desire to memorialize that agreement for purposes of the actual 

litigation to permit counsel for Defendant Children’s Hospital Central California to share 

compilations and summaries from those documents but not the actual documents themselves, 

with the personnel identified in paragraph 4 above, the Hospital’s in-house counsel, Mr. 

Richard Wolf, and insurance representatives, so long as those persons agree that information 

will not otherwise be disclosed to anyone other than the persons referenced in Section 7 of the 

Stipulated Protective Order. 

6. The parties have agreed that the time period to challenge this designation shall 

be waived as it relates to these documents and that the provisions of paragraph 5 of the 

Stipulated Protective Order shall not apply to this designation. Defendant Children’s Hospital 

Central California shall have the opportunity at any time in the future during the course of this 

case to challenge this designation if it so desires, including seeking the ability to share certain 

documents with the client or other persons. 

DATED: ___3/18/10____ By: __/s/ WILLIAM C. HAHESY__________ 

 William C. Hahesy, 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL CENTRAL 

CALIFORNIA 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-01273-LJO -MJS Document 47 Filed 03/30/10 Page 2 of 4
C:\Windows\Temp\notes101AA1\stip concerning documents.doc 3 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION CONCERNING DOCUMENTS MARKED CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: ___3/19/10_____ CHRISTENSEN & AUER 

 By: __/s/ STEPHEN AUER_____________ 

 Stephen Auer, 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DATED: __ 3/19/10______ DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP 

 By:__/s/ WILLIAM C. HAHESY for_____ 

Douglas Ross 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL CENTRAL 

CALIFORNIA 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-01273-LJO -MJS Document 47 Filed 03/30/10 Page 3 of 4
C:\Windows\Temp\notes101AA1\stip concerning documents.doc 4 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION CONCERNING DOCUMENTS MARKED CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PERINATAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., 

KRISHNAKUMAR RAJANI, M.D., and 

STEPHEN ELLIOT, M.D. 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL CENTRAL 

CALIFORNIA,INC., a California 

Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No.1:09-CV-01273 LJO SMS 

ORDER ON STIPULATION 

CONCERNING DOCUMENTS 

MARKED 

CONFIDENITAL/ATTORNEY’S 

EYES ONLY 

The Court having reviewed the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing 

therefor: 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 29, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-01273-LJO -MJS Document 47 Filed 03/30/10 Page 4 of 4