Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00255/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00255-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH GARCIA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

BAYSIDE FUNDING GROUP, et al.,

Defendants

 /

No. C 06-00255 CRB

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is the motion to dismiss of defendant Patric Cuspard,

sued as Bayside Funding Group. After carefully considering the papers filed by the parties,

the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Local Rule 7-1(b), and rules as

follows:

1. Defendant’s motion to strike certain language of the complaint as impertinent is

DENIED.

2. Plaintiffs’ request to file an amended complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiffs have the

right to file an amended complaint without leave of Court. See Crum v. Circus

Enterprises, 213 F.3d 1129, 1130 n.3 (9th Cir. 2000). Plaintiffs seek leave to amend

only because they seek to add a new party to the complaint, Fidelity Mortgage

Company. Accordingly, the Court will not consider defendant Cuspard’s substantive

objections to the complaint and the motion to dismiss/strike is DISMISSED AS 

Case 3:06-cv-00255-CRB Document 17 Filed 05/12/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2006\0255\orderreamend.wpd 2

MOOT without prejudice to defendant filing a new motion in response to the amended

complaint. For the parties’ future reference, the Court notes that parties may cite to

cases published in electronic databases, including Westlaw and Lexis. See Civil

Local Rule 3-4(d). 

3. Plaintiffs shall file their amended complaint within five days of the filing of this

Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2006 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00255-CRB Document 17 Filed 05/12/06 Page 2 of 2