Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02492/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02492-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

 10

 11

 12

 13

 14

 15

 16

 17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- 06cv2492-BEN (BLM) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AFFORDABLE ROOFING, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

BROOKS DUNLAP, et al.,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 06cv2492-BEN (BLM)

ORDER FOLLOWING EARLY NEUTRAL

EVALUATION CONFERENCE, SETTING

RULE 26 COMPLIANCE AND NOTICE

OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

On February 21, 2007 at 1:30 p.m. the Court convened an Early

Neutral Evaluation Conference (ENE) in the above-entitled action.

Appearing were Dennis Atchley, Esq. and James Merrill on behalf of

plaintiff and Charles Fougeron, Esq., Brooks Dunlap, and April

Dunlap on behalf of defendants.

Settlement of the case could not be reached at the ENE and

the Court therefore discussed compliance with Rule 26 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure. Based thereon, the Court issues the

following orders:

1. Any objections made to initial disclosure pursuant to

Rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) are overruled, and the parties are ordered to

proceed with the initial disclosure process. Any further objections

Case 3:06-cv-02492-BEN-BLM Document 10 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 2
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

 10

 11

 12

 13

 14

 15

 16

 17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- 06cv2492-BEN (BLM) 

to initial disclosure will be resolved as required by Rule 26;

2. The Rule 26(f) conference shall be completed on or

before March 7, 2007;

3. A joint discovery plan shall be lodged with Magistrate

Judge Barbara L. Major on or before March 14, 2007;

4. Initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) shall

occur on or before March 21, 2007; and,

5. A Case Management Conference pursuant to Rule 16(b)

shall be held on March 28, 2007 at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter

as the Court's calendar will allow, with the chambers of Magistrate

Judge Major. Counsel shall appear telephonically. The Court will

initiate the conference call.

Parties are hereby warned that failure to comply with this

Order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Additionally,

failure to respond to discovery requests or to comply with the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding discovery may result in

the imposition of sanctions including monetary sanctions,

evidentiary sanctions and the dismissal or default of your case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 22, 2007

BARBARA L. MAJOR

United States Magistrate Judge

COPY TO:

HONORABLE ROGER T. BENITEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ALL COUNSEL AND PARTIES

Case 3:06-cv-02492-BEN-BLM Document 10 Filed 02/22/07 Page 2 of 2