Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01771/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01771-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARL LORESCH,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-1771 RRB GGH P

vs.

BILL LOCKYER, et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed March 28, 2007, this action was construed as a petition for writ

of habeas corpus, and petitioner was ordered to file a habeas corpus petition within thirty days. 

The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order and

has not filed a habeas corpus petition. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this

action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-01771-JKS-GGH Document 19 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 6/20/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

lore1771.ff

Case 2:06-cv-01771-JKS-GGH Document 19 Filed 06/21/07 Page 2 of 2