Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00557/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00557-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WANI J. KOSE,

Plaintiff,

v.

H. SIEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:23-cv-00557-ADA-CDB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF No. 12)

Plaintiff Wani J. Krose is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 

civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 27, 2023, the Magistrate Judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that 

Plaintiff had stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against Defendant 

Siez and cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims 

against Defendants Analyn and Walker, all in their individual capacities. (ECF No. 12.) Based 

on this, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the matter proceed against Defendants in their 

individual capacities, and that the Court dismiss, pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment, monetary 

claims against Defendants in their professional capacities. (Id. at 11.) The Magistrate Judge’s 

findings and recommendations contained notice that Plaintiff had fourteen days within which to 

file objections. (Id. at 12.) That deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed objections.

Case 1:23-cv-00557-KES-CDB Document 13 Filed 08/22/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that 

the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly,

1. The findings and recommendations issued on June 27, 2023, (ECF No. 12), are 

adopted in full;

2. This action will proceed on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim 

against Defendant Siez and his Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to 

serious medical needs claims against Defendants Analyn and Walker, in their 

individual capacities only;

3. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Siez, Analyn, and Walker, in their official 

capacities, are dismissed; and

4. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 22, 2023 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:23-cv-00557-KES-CDB Document 13 Filed 08/22/23 Page 2 of 2