Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-00713/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-00713-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 05cv0713

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARLUK KHAN MAYWEATHERS, Civil No. 05-CV-0713 WQH (CAB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING BOXES OF

DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY

PLAINTIFF TO THE COURT

v.

R. Q. HICKMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

This case is brought by a state prisoner proceeding pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 8,

2007, the court received from Plaintiff three large cardboard boxes full of miscellaneous papers which

included pleadings, various documents, and magazines. There was no written explanation of what the

documents were and why they were submitted. Therefore the purpose of this submission and the

relation of the papers to the present case cannot be determined. The attempted filing also violated

numerous Local Rules. The entire three boxes could not be accepted for filing and will be returned to

Plaintiff. Plaintiff will also be sent a copy of the discrepancy order which specifies the reasons for the

rejection. 

It appears that Plaintiff’s attempted filing contains original documents. To ensure the integrity of

Plaintiff’s papers, the court staff did not rearrange or remove any of the documents. The papers are

mailed back to Plaintiff in the exact same condition they arrived in. 

The Court notes that on July 31, 2007, the undersigned Magistrate Judge issued a Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”) finding that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be denied

Case 3:05-cv-00713-WQH-CAB Document 97 Filed 08/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 05cv0713

because the motion was not supported by evidence. The objections to the R&R are due on August 27,

2007. In the event the documents in the boxes represented Plaintiff’s attempt to submit evidentiary

support for his objections to the R&R, Plaintiff may re-file the documents as long as they are duly

organized, identified and attached to a legal document captioned “Objections to Report and

Recommendation.” The Objections to Report and Recommendation should explain the relation of the

documents to the present case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 10, 2007

CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00713-WQH-CAB Document 97 Filed 08/13/07 Page 2 of 2