Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01605/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01605-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW R. LOPEZ,

Plaintiff, 2:03-cv-1605-GEB-DAD-P

vs.

S. COOK, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On December 4, 2006, 2006, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s order filed November 14, 2006,” which is construed as a request for

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order which denied plaintiff’s request for partial

summary judgment and request for appointment of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-

303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 

Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s

ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

///// 

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:03-cv-01605-KJM-DB Document 86 Filed 12/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed November 14, 2006, is affirmed. 

Dated: December 12, 2006

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01605-KJM-DB Document 86 Filed 12/12/06 Page 2 of 2