Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02454/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02454-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARYL GRANT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-2454 LKK JFM PS

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, 

et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed October 12, 2005, plaintiff's fourth amended complaint was

dismissed and thirty days leave to file a fifth amended complaint was granted. The thirty day

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a fifth amended complaint or otherwise

responded to the court's order, despite this court’s November 2, 2005 order advising plaintiff his

fifth amended complaint must be filed no later than November 14, 2005.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

Case 2:03-cv-02454-LKK -JFM Document 65 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 28, 2005. 

001; grant2454.fta

Case 2:03-cv-02454-LKK -JFM Document 65 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2