Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-00559/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-00559-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

861394.1 CV 12-0559-RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP. 

DIGITAL DOWNLOADS LITIGATION

CASE NO. CV 12-0559-RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 3:12-cv-00559-RS Document 115 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

861394.1 2 CV 12-0559-RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

The Court, having reviewed the Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 

between Plaintiffs Kathy Sledge Lightfoot, Ronee Blakley and Gary Wright (“Plaintiffs”) and 

Defendant Warner Music Group Corp. (“WMG”), the evidence and argument provided by the 

parties, and the pleadings and other papers on file in this action, hereby GRANTS final approval 

to the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, as detailed below.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this litigation and over the 

parties to the Settlement Agreement.

2. For purposes of this Order, except as otherwise set forth herein, the Court adopts 

and incorporates the definitions contained in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement.

3. The Court hereby finally approves and confirms the settlement set forth in the 

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement and finds that said settlement is, in all respects, fair, 

adequate, and reasonable to the Class.

4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 23, the Court finds that the 

Class to satisfies the elements of Rule 23(a), (b)(2), and (b)(3). Pursuant to Rule 23(g), the Court 

appoints previously-appointed Class Counsel, Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP, Lieff, Cabraser, 

Heimann & Bernstein LLP, Phillips, Erlewine & Given LLP, Hausfeld LLP, and Kiesel Boucher 

Larson LLP, as Counsel for the Class. 

5. The Court finds that the persons identified in Exhibit “A” attached hereto have 

timely and validly requested exclusion from the Class, and therefore, are excluded accordingly. 

Such persons are not included in or bound by this Final Judgment. Such persons are not entitled to 

any recovery from the settlement proceeds obtained through this settlement. 

6. The Court finds that the objection of Debra Sledge, Joan Sledge, and Kim Sledge 

Allen (Dkt. No. 107) is invalid because they have been excluded from the class as all Class 

Members who are parties to the Sister Sledge Class Contract did not submit claims. See, 

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, § 21(a) (Dkt. 96-1); see also Declaration of Melissa 

Eisert, ¶ 10(a). Only class members have standing to object to a class settlement. In re Vitamins 

Antitrust Class Actions, 215 F.3d 26, 28-29 (D.D.C. 2000); Moore v. Verizon Communications 

Case 3:12-cv-00559-RS Document 115 Filed 01/12/15 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

861394.1 3 CV 12-0559-RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Inc., 2013 WL 4610764 (N.D. Cal 2013) (“[i]t is well-settled that only class members may object 

to a class action settlement.”); and Conte & Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions § 13:23 (5th ed.

2014). Despite the lack of standing, the Court has considered the objection made to the settlement 

and hereby overrules such objection, finding that it does not call into question the fairness, 

adequacy, or reasonableness of the settlement to the Class. 

7. The Court hereby dismisses on the merits and with prejudice the claims asserted in 

this litigation by Plaintiffs against WMG, with Plaintiffs and WMG to bear their own costs and 

attorneys’ fees except as provided for in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement.

8. Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class, and each Class Member on behalf of themselves, 

their heirs, executors, administrators, attorneys, successors and assigns, and any persons they 

represent, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the dismissal of the Action shall have, 

fully, finally and forever released, relinquished, and discharged the Released Parties with respect 

to each and every Released Claim and shall forever be enjoined from prosecuting any of the 

Released Claims with respect to each and every Released Party and covenant not to sue any of the 

Released Parties with respect to any of the Released Claims. 

(a) “Released Parties” means Defendant, including its unincorporated divisions 

and business units, and any of its past, present, or future parent entities, associates, affiliates, 

subsidiaries, or licensees and each and all of their past, present and future officers, directors, 

stockholders, principals, employees, advisors, agents, attorneys, financial or investment advisers, 

consultants, lenders, insurers, investment bankers, commercial bankers, representatives, affiliates, 

associates, parents, subsidiaries, joint ventures, general and limited partners and partnerships, 

heirs, executors, trustees, personal representatives, estates, administrators, trusts, predecessors, 

successors and assigns.

(b) “Released Claims” shall collectively mean any and all actions, suits, claims, 

demands, rights, liabilities and causes of action, of every nature and description whatsoever, 

whether individual, class, derivative, representative, legal, equitable or any other type or in any 

other capacity, or concealed or hidden, that were asserted or that could have been asserted 

(including without limitation claims for negligence, gross negligence breach of contract, breach of 

Case 3:12-cv-00559-RS Document 115 Filed 01/12/15 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

861394.1 4 CV 12-0559-RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

duty of care and/or breach of duty of loyalty, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or violations of any 

state or federal common law, statutes, rules, or regulations), including both known claims and 

Unknown Claims, that the Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class, any Class Member or any of them in 

the past had, now has, or might in the future have against the Released Parties or any of them (i) 

on the basis of, connected with, or in any way arising out of any allegation that any past, present, 

or future accrual of royalties for transactions involving Downloads/Mastertones anywhere in the 

world on the ground (whatever the theory and wherever in the world the transaction takes place) 

that transactions involving Downloads/Mastertones are not sales and/or that compensation for 

transactions involving Downloads/Mastertones should not be paid on a Royalty Rate Basis or a 

Penny Rate Basis as applicable under the so-called “Records Sold” provision of the applicable 

Class Contract and/or that royalty recipients should receive different royalty treatment for 

Downloads/Mastertones depending on the nature of WMG’s contractual relationship with digital 

music retailers such as Apple’s iTunes Store; and (ii) as to the adequacy and accuracy of anything 

contained within WMG’s Settlement Class Relief Report, which will be finally confirmed through 

the process set forth in Paragraph 21(e), except as otherwise set forth herein.

9. The Court finds that the settlement Notice disseminated to the Class was the best 

notice that was practicable under the circumstances. Said Notice provided due and adequate 

notice of these proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, including the proposed settlement 

set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, and fully satisfied the requirements of 

Rule 23(c)(2) and (e) and due process.

10. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, the Court hereby retains 

continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of the settlement and any 

distribution to Class Members pursuant to further orders of this Court; (b) hearing and determining 

Plaintiff’s application for attorneys’ fees, costs, and Named Plaintiffs’ incentive award; (c) WMG

until the Final Judgment contemplated hereby has become effective and each and every act agreed 

to be performed by the parties has been performed pursuant to the Stipulation and Agreement of 

Settlement; and (d) all parties and Class Members for the purpose of enforcing and administering 

the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement.

Case 3:12-cv-00559-RS Document 115 Filed 01/12/15 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

861394.1 5 CV 12-0559-RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

11. In the event the settlement does not become effective in accordance with the terms 

of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, then the judgment shall be rendered null and void 

and shall be vacated, and in such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection 

herewith shall be null and void and the parties shall be returned to their respective positions ex 

ante.

12. The Court finds, pursuant to Rule 54(a) and (b), that this Final Judgment should be 

entered and further finds that there is no just reason for delay in the entry of this judgment as a 

Final Judgment, as to the parties to the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement. Accordingly, the 

Clerk is hereby directed to enter Judgment forthwith. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 12, 2015

Honorable Richard Seeborg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:12-cv-00559-RS Document 115 Filed 01/12/15 Page 5 of 5