Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00784/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00784-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 423
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157
Cause of Action: 28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference

---

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JUAN C. BASOMBRIO (SBN 150703) 

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 

Dorsey & Whitney LLP 

38 Technology Drive 

Irvine, California 92618-5310 

Phone: (949) 932-3600 

Facsimile: (949) 932-3601 

Attorneys for Cross-Defendant 

CURTAIN WALL DESIGN & CONSULTING, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

IN RE: 

SUNTERRA CORPORATION, 

 Debtor 

__________________________________

SUNTERRA CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

PERINI BUILDING COMPANY, et al., 

 Defendants. 

__________________________________

PERINI BUILDING COMPANY, 

 Cross-Complainant, 

 vs. 

CHAVARRIA GLASS SERVICE, INC. et 

al, 

 Cross-Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 2:04-CV-00784-MCE-EFB

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

TIME FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT 

CURTAIN WALL DESIGN & 

CONSULTING, INC. TO RESPOND 

TO THIRD AMENDED CROSSCOMPLAINT OF DEFENDANT 

AND CROSS-COMPLAINANT 

PERINI BUILDING COMPANY; 

AND ORDER THEREON 

Case 2:04-cv-00784-MCE -EFB Document 223 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendant and Cross-Complainant 

Perini Building Company (hereafter, “Perini”) and Cross-Defendant Curtain Wall & 

Design Consulting, Inc. (hereafter, “CDC”), through their undersigned counsel, that 

CDC shall have a thirty-day extension up to and including August 24, 2007 in which to 

answer or otherwise respond to Perini’s Third Amended Cross-Complaint in the abovecaptioned action. The purpose of the extension is to provide Perini with sufficient time 

to evaluate whether it desires to pursue its Third Amended Cross-Complaint as to CDC. 

No prior extensions have been requested or provided. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 DATED: July 24, 2007 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 

 By: 

 JUAN C. BASOMBRIO 

Attorneys for Cross-Defendant CURTAIN 

WALL DESIGN & CONSULTING, INC. 

 DATED: July 24, 2007 ROBINSON & WOOD, INC. 

 By: 

DAVID S. HENNINGSEN 

DARRELL V. NGUYEN 

Attorneys for Defendant and CrossComplainant PERINI BUILDING 

COMPANY 

ORDER

 BASED ON THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

No further extensions will be granted absent specific good cause by the parties. 

DATED: July 31, 2007

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:04-cv-00784-MCE -EFB Document 223 Filed 08/01/07 Page 2 of 2