Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06076/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06076-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

Case No. CV07-06076 SI

STIPULATION TO ALLOW FILING OF 2d AMENDED COMPLAINT & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MICHAEL SAVAGE,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC

RELATIONS, INC., COUNCIL ON 

AMERICAN ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION 

NETWORK, INC., COUNCIL ON AMERICAN 

ISLAMIC RELATIONS OF SANTA CLARA, 

INC., and DOES 3-100,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV07-06076 SI

STIPULATION TO ALLOW FILING OF 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

STIPULATION AS TO FORM OF 

ANSWERS AND JOINDER IN PENDING 

MOTION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

This stipulation is entered into by Daniel Horowitz on behalf of plaintiff and Thomas R. 

Burke of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on behalf of all defendants presently named in the lawsuit 

and the CAIR entity which is referred to herein as the Council on American Islamic Relations, Inc., 

incorporated in Washington, D.C. and commonly referred to as CAIR-National.

Case 3:07-cv-06076-SI Document 16 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:07-cv-06076-SI Document 17 Filed 02/14/08 Page 1 of 3
2

Case No. CV07-06076 SI

STIPULATION TO ALLOW FILING OF 2d AMENDED COMPLAINT & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SFO 403017v1 0085997-000001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

It is hereby stipulated that plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint that is identical 

to the present, Amended Complaint except that paragraph 9 shall be modified to name the entity 

commonly referred to as CAIR-National. The present paragraph 9 reads as follows:

9. The self-proclaimed leaders of the Council on American Islamic Relations aka 

CAIR operates out of Washington, D.C. and where the actual name of the 

corporation is Council on American Islamic Relations Action Network aka CAIR. 

Therefore, Doe 2 is named herein as the Council on American Islamic Relations 

Action Network, Inc. aka CAIR. However, in its IRS Form 990 filing in 2005, the 

group used the corporate name, Council on American Islamic Relations and not 

Council on American Islamic Relations Action Network.

By this stipulation the parties agree that a Second Amended Complaint may be filed that is 

identical to the first except that it adds the following to paragraph 9. 

In the alternative, Doe 2 is sued under the name Council on American Islamic

Relations Inc. This entity is intended to be the group that is headquartered in

Washington D.C. and which is commonly referred to as CAIR-National.

It is further stipulated that the each defendant who has not yet appeared, may answer or 

otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint with reference to the names set forth in the 

Second Amended Complaint and may do so without conceding that such name or designation is the 

correct name or designation of said entity. Defendant(s) in their Answer will set forth the correct 

legal name and status as the defendant deems proper.

It is further stipulated that a filing of the Second Amended Complaint does not moot the 

pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and all named defendants may join in the Fed. Rule 

Civ. Proc. 12 (c) motion filed by Council on American Islamic Relations of Santa Clara, Inc. 

whether or not they have filed an answer. It is agreed that their joinder in the motion shall be 

deemed to be made under Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. § 12(b)(6) and/or 12(c) as the Court deems proper.

The present briefing schedule shall remain unchanged.

///

Case 3:07-cv-06076-SI Document 16 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:07-cv-06076-SI Document 17 Filed 02/14/08 Page 2 of 3
3

Case No. CV07-06076 SI

STIPULATION TO ALLOW FILING OF 2d AMENDED COMPLAINT & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SFO 403017v1 0085997-000001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

It is further stipulated that any response currently due by defendants CAIR-Texas or 

CAIR-National to Plaintiff s First Amended Complaint may await the Court s anticipated approval

of Plaintiff s filing of the Second Amended Complaint. Once Plaintiff s Second Amended

Complaint has been filed and all of the CAIR Defendants have been served by process on their 

counsel of record (who is authorized to accept service on their behalf), the deadline for the response 

of the CAIR Defendants to the Second Amended Complaint shall be continued until the Court has 

ruled on the pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.

DATED this 8th day of February 2008. 

By: /s/ Daniel A Horowitz_______________

DANIEL A. HOROWITZ

Attorney for Plaintiff

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION

By: /s/ Thomas R. Burke________________

THOMAS R. BURKE

Attorneys for Defendant Council on 

American-Islamic Relations of Santa 

Clara, Inc.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED:

DATE: _____________________ ______________________________________

Susan Illston

Judge of the United States District Court

Case 3:07-cv-06076-SI Document 16 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 3 of 3 Case 3:07-cv-06076-SI Document 17 Filed 02/14/08 Page 3 of 3