Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00385/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00385-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 168973)

Chief, Criminal Division

AARON D. WEGNER (CABN 243809)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6831

Facsimile: (415) 436-6982

E-mail: aaron.wegner@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HUY TRINH et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR-10-0385-SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME

FROM JUNE 4, 2010, TO JULY 30, 2010,

FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

CALCULATION (18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(7)(A))

On June 4, 2010, co-defendants Huy Trinh, Lan Jin, and Andy Wong made their Initial

Appearance in front of the Court. At that time, the government stated discovery production was

ongoing and the Court continued the case until July 30, 2010, to allow defense counsel an

opportunity to review discovery. Over the objection of counsel for defendant Andy Wong, the

Court agreed to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act until July 30, 2010.

With the agreement of the parties (with the exception of defendant Andy Wong), the

Court enters this order documenting the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h), from June 4, 2010, through July 30, 2010.

Case 3:10-cv-00385-EDL Document 17 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

With the exception of counsel for defendant Andy Wong, the parties agree, and the Court

finds and holds, as follows:

1. The defendants agree to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act from June 4,

2010, through July 30, 2010, based upon the need for effective preparation of counsel and to

provide the defendants an opportunity to review discovery. The defendants agree to this

exclusion on the condition that their right to bring motions claiming Speedy Trial Act violations

prior to June 4, 2010, shall remain preserved.

2. Counsel for the defendants believes that the exclusion of time is their clients’ best 

interest.

3. Given these circumstances, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by excluding

the period from June 4, 2010, through July 30, 2010, outweigh the best interest of the public and

the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

4. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendants, the Court orders the period from

June 4, 2010, through July 30, 2010, shall be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations under

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).

STIPULATED:

DATED: 6/23/2010 /s/

STEVE GRUEL

Attorney for Defendant Huy Trinh

DATED: 6/23/2010 /s/

JEFFERY SCHWARTZ

Attorney for Defendant Lan Jin

DATED: 6/23/2010 /s/

AARON D. WEGNER

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:________________ _______________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

2

Case 3:10-cv-00385-EDL Document 17 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 2