Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-02914/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-02914-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ViCHIP CORPORATION,

Plaintiff, No. C 04-2914 PJH

v. ORDER

TSU-CHANG LEE,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

Before the court is defendant’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Remove Incorrectly

Filed Documents. Defendant appears to have noticed the motion for a “current” hearing

date of April 26, 2006, although certain of defendant’s moving papers set forth a hearing

date of May 17, 2006. Neither hearing date complies with Civil Local Rule 7-2(a). 

Accordingly, under normal circumstances, defendant’s motion would be considered

improperly filed. The court, however, regards defendant’s motion as a motion for

administrative relief, as it deals in substance with a miscellaneous administrative matter

that is not otherwise governed by federal statute or local rule. See Civ. L.R. 7-11. As such,

the matter has been deemed submitted for determination without hearing, and the court

hereby proceeds to rule on defendant’s request as follows: 

The deadline for the filing of an opposition to defendant’s motion having passed

without any filing by plaintiff, defendant’s request to remove (1) the Declaration of G.

Whitney Leigh in Support of Dr. Lee’s Opposition to Vi-Chip’s Motion for Summary

Judgment and (2) the Declaration of Tsu-Chang Lee in Support of Dr. Lee’s Opposition to

Vi-Chip’s Motion for Summary Judgment from the electronic court file is GRANTED. The

court further accepts for filing the replacement declarations of G. Whitney Leigh and Dr.

Case 4:04-cv-02914-PJH Document 213 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Tsu-Chang Lee in Support of Dr. Lee’s Opposition to Vi-Chip’s Motion for Summary

Judgment, along with defendant’s corresponding administrative motion to file those

declarations under seal. The court will determine the propriety of defendant’s

administrative motion to seal the declarations in conjunction with the hearing on plaintiff’s

motion for summary judgment, set for May 17, 2006. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 25, 2006 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-02914-PJH Document 213 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 2