Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-01759/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-01759-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983bv Bivens Non-Prisoner

---

1

17-cv-1759-WQH-BGS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAMID ASGARI,

Plaintiff,

v.

IMMIGRATION OF PHOENIX, 

IMMIGRATION OF 

CALIFORNIA, HOMELAND 

SECURITY (AZ), POLICE OF 

PHOENIX, and FBI (AZ),

Defendants.

Case No.: 17-cv-1759-WQH-BGS

ORDER

HAYES, Judge:

On August 31, 2017, Plaintiff Hamid Asgari initiated this action by filing the 

Complaint (ECF No. 1). On January 29, 2018, the Court issued an Order stating:

[T]he Court will dismiss this action against all Defendants without prejudice 

on March 2, 2018 unless, no later than that date, Plaintiff files either (1) proof 

that service of the Amended Summons and Complaint was timely effectuated 

or (2) a declaration under penalty of perjury showing good cause for failure 

to timely effect service upon the Defendants accompanied by a motion for 

leave to serve process outside of the 90-day period.

(ECF No. 13 at 2). On March 5, 2018, the Court issued an Order dismissing the Complaint 

without prejudice on the grounds that “Plaintiff ha[d] filed neither proof that service of the 

Amended Summons and Complaint was timely effectuated nor a declaration showing good 

cause for failure to timely effect service upon the Defendants.” (ECF No. 14 at 1). 

Case 3:17-cv-01759-WQH-BGS Document 17 Filed 04/19/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

17-cv-1759-WQH-BGS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On April 18, 2018, Asgari filed a Phoenix Municipal Court Judgment and Sentence 

Order (ECF No. 16). The Phoenix Municipal Court Judgment and Sentence Order (ECF 

No. 16) is neither “proof that service of the Amended Summons and Complaint was timely 

effectuated nor a declaration showing good cause for failure to timely effect service upon 

the Defendants.” (ECF No. 14 at 1). The Complaint (ECF No. 1) remains DISMISSED. 

Dated: April 19, 2018

Case 3:17-cv-01759-WQH-BGS Document 17 Filed 04/19/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2