Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378-43/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STATEMENT OF NON-ASSERTION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C 02-3378 EDL 

LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB NO. 054283) 

 e-mail: lpasahow@fenwick.com 

J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB NO. 176148) 

 e-mail: dhadden@fenwick.com 

DARREN E. DONNELLY (CSB NO. 194335) 

 e-mail: ddonnelly@fenwick.com 

CAROLYN CHANG (CSB NO. 217933) 

 e-mail: cchang@fenwick.com 

RYAN A. TYZ (CSB NO. 234895) 

 e-mail: rtyz@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB No. 223936) 

 e-mail: dschumann@fenwick.com 

DAVID M. LACY KUSTERS (CSB NO. 241335) 

 e-mail: dlacykusters@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 1200 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA INTEGRATION, 

INC., formerly known as ACTA 

TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case No. C 02-03378 EDL 

STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER DISMISSING THE ‘990 

PATENT, AND RELATED DEFENSES 

AND COUNTERCLAIMS 

Trial Date: March 12, 2006 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 512 Filed 02/27/07 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STATEMENT OF NON-ASSERTION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C 02-3378 EDL 2

Pursuant to this Court’s repeated suggestion, to avoid confusion of the issues at trial 

between the patents-in-suit, Informatica Corporation (“Informatica”) respectfully submits this 

Statement of Non-Assertion of U.S. Patent 6,208,990 (“the ‘990 Patent”) and [Proposed] Order 

dismissing the ‘990 patent, and related defenses and counterclaims, from this case. Defendant 

Business Objects Data Integration, Inc. (“BODI”) does not object to this statement and dismissal. 

STATEMENT OF NON-ASSERTION

 Informatica Corporation hereby unconditionally agrees not to assert against Defendant 

Business Objects Data Integration, Inc. (“BODI”) any claim for liability for infringement of the 

‘990 Patent for its activities respecting the accused Data Integrator products in this case as they 

exist today or have existed in the past. 

Dated: February 21, 2007 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Carolyn Chang 

Carolyn Chang 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 512 Filed 02/27/07 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STATEMENT OF NON-ASSERTION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C 02-3378 EDL 3

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Pursuant to Plaintiff Informatica’s Statement of Non-Assertion, the Court hereby orders 

that: 

 1. Plaintiff Informatica’s infringement claims on the ‘990 Patent are dismissed from 

this action with prejudice; 

 2. Defendant BODI’s counterclaims on the ‘990 patent are dismissed from this action 

without prejudice; and 

 3. The parties to this action are prohibited from presenting any evidence or argument 

at trial concerning the ‘990 patent. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February _____, 2007 By: 

Elizabeth D. Laporte 

United States District Magistrate 

 

26

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 512 Filed 02/27/07 Page 3 of 3