Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02584/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02584-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

Defendant.

No. 2:16-cv-02584-KJM-KJN

ORDER

On December 10, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 

remanded this matter to this court for further proceedings. (ECF No. 54.) Due to the plaintiff’s 

pro se status, the undersigned continued to preside over this action pursuant to Local Rule 

302(c)(21). However, on February 28, 2020, plaintiff’s counsel entered an appearance in this 

case. (ECF No. 64.) Because no party is proceeding pro se in this action, Local Rule 302(c)(21) 

no longer applies and the case is referred back to the assigned District Judge. Therefore, all 

pretrial motions, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed for hearing before the 

District Judge assigned to this action. The assigned magistrate judge shall continue to perform all 

duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20).

///

///

///

Case 2:16-cv-02584-KJM-KJN Document 65 Filed 03/12/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is referred back to the District 

Judge assigned to this action pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 12, 2020

16cv2584.refer

Case 2:16-cv-02584-KJM-KJN Document 65 Filed 03/12/20 Page 2 of 2