Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06700/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06700-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY MEEKS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

K. ALLISON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-06700-REC-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 49)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 30) AND

DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff Gary Meeks (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 26, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. 

After obtaining an extension of time, plaintiff filed an

objection to the Findings and Recommendations on October 31, 

Case 1:03-cv-06700-OWW -GSA Document 55 Filed 12/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2005. Defendants filed a reply to plaintiff’s objection on

November 2, 2005.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 26,

2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed April 8,

2005, is GRANTED, thus concluding this action in its

entirety; and

3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for

defendants. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 1, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06700-OWW -GSA Document 55 Filed 12/02/05 Page 2 of 2