Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02712/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02712-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

- 1 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

Case No. C 09-02712 CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JEFFREY D. MEYER 

MOULTON & MEYER, LLP 

800 Taft 

Houston, Texas 77019 

(713) 353-6699 Telephone 

(713) 353-6698 Telecopier 

Pro hac vice application to be filed 

GEORGE L. HAMPTON IV, State Bar No. 144433 

HAMPTONHOLLEY LLP 

2101 East Coast Highway, Suite 260 

Corona del Mar, CA 92625 

Telephone: (949) 718-4550 

Facsimile: (949) 718-4580 

CHRISTOPHER A. BANDAS 

BANDAS LAW FIRM, P.C. 

500 North Shoreline, Suite 1020 

Corpus Christi, Texas 78471 

Telephone: (361) 698-5200 

Facsimile: (361) 698-5222 

Pro hac vice application to be filed 

*Additional Counsel on last page 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MAHBOD KHALILPOUR 

and Plaintiff Class 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

MAHBOD KHALILPOUR, on behalf of himself 

and all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON 

WIRELESS; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 09-02712 CW 

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER 

Case 3:09-cv-02712-RS Document 29 Filed 01/14/10 Page 1 of 3
- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

Case No. C 09-02712 CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, on April 24, 2009, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this class action lawsuit, 

which relates to California consumers’ purchases of Unlimited option Get It Now games from 

Defendant Verizon Wireless, in the Alameda County Superior Court; 

WHEREAS, on June 18, 2009, Defendant filed a notice of removal and removed the case 

to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; 

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2009, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, on September 22, 2009, Plaintiff served its First Set of Requests for 

Production of Documents and First Set of Interrogatories on Defendant; 

WHEREAS, thereafter, the parties agreed to extend Defendant’s deadline to respond to 

Plaintiff’s discovery requests while the parties engaged in private mediation; 

WHEREAS, the parties participated in an all-day mediation session with The Honorable 

William J. Cahill (ret.) on December 21, 2009; 

WHEREAS, the parties made progress during this mediation session and intend to 

continue the mediation process; 

WHEREAS, the parties have begun discovery related to class issues, but require 

additional time to complete class-related discovery; 

THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed to by and between the parties, through 

their counsel of record, that the case schedule be modified as follows: 

Plaintiff shall disclose the identities and reports of any expert witnesses regarding class 

certification by April 13, 2010. Defendant shall disclose the identities and reports of any expert 

witnesses regarding class certification by April 27, 2010. Expert discovery regarding class 

certification shall be completed by May 18, 2010. Plaintiff shall have until May 18, 2010 to file 

its motion for class certification, Defendant shall have until June 24, 2010 to file its opposition, 

Plaintiff shall have until July 8, 2010 to file its reply, and the hearing shall be set for July 22, 

2010 or as soon thereafter as is convenient with the Court’s calendar. 

The parties further request that the case management conference currently scheduled for 

April 29, 2010 be rescheduled to the same date as the rescheduled class certification hearing. 

Case 3:09-cv-02712-RS Document 29 Filed 01/14/10 Page 2 of 3
- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

Case No. C 09-02712 CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DATED: January 11, 2010 RAO ONGARO BURTT & TILIAKOS LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Amelia D. Winchester 

 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 MAHBOD KHALILPOUR 

DATED: January 11, 2010 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ 

 Tiffany Cheung 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Verizon Wireless 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 1/14/10 By: 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-02712-RS Document 29 Filed 01/14/10 Page 3 of 3