Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05249/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05249-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on July 6, 2006, as undeliverable. 

1

A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Paroled. However, plaintiff has not notified the court of

any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. See Local Rule

83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT ALEXANDER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PEREZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-05249-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 53)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Robert Alexander (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 28, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within eleven (11) days. To

date, plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:03-cv-05249-OWW -LJO Document 55 Filed 08/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed June 28, 2006,

are ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED for Plaintiff’s failure to

prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 6, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05249-OWW -LJO Document 55 Filed 08/08/06 Page 2 of 2