Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02053/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02053-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 362
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DEFENSE MEDICAL EXAMINATION

LOUIS H. DE HAAS, SBN 39579

LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON,

DE HAAS, FESLER & AMES

865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200

Los Angeles, California 90017-5431

Phone: (213) 426-3600

Facsimile: (213) 426-3650

BARRY VOGEL, STATE BAR NO. 108640

LARRY THORNTON, STATE BAR NO. 232265

LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON,

DE HAAS, FESLER & AMES

655 University Avenue, Suite 119

Sacramento, California 95825

Phone: (916) 563-3100

Facsimile: (916) 565-3704

Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant

Sutter Davis Hospital

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E.R., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad 

Litem, CAROLYN YOUNG,

Plaintiff,

v.

SUTTER DAVIS HOSPITAL, SUTTER 

WEST WOMEN'S HEALTH, SUSAN 

MAAYAH, M.D., and DOES 1 to 100, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

SUTTER DAVIS HOSPITAL,

 Cross-Complainant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Cross-Defendant.

Case No.: 2:14-CV-02053-WBS-CKD

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

DEFENSE MEDICAL EXAMINATION

Hon. William B. Shubb

///

Case 2:14-cv-02053-WBS-CKD Document 28 Filed 10/22/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DEFENSE MEDICAL EXAMINATION

THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, 

STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

Pursuant to FRCP 35, plaintiff E.R., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem 

Carolyn Young, will appear for a physical examination by:

NAME: Donald Olson, M.D.

ADDRESS: La Follette, Johnson, De Haas

Fesler & Ames

655 University Avenue, Suite 119

Sacramento, CA 95825

DATE OF EXAM: Monday, October 26, 2015

TIME OF EXAM: 10:00 a.m.

The nature, scope, conditions and manner of the examination are to be as follows:

1. The examining physician may ask, and plaintiff’s guardian shall answer, 

questions relating to present symptoms and conditions, and present medical history. 

2. The examining physician may use accepted diagnostic instruments, tests, 

manipulations and techniques as may be appropriate upon consent of plaintiff’s guardian, but 

no procedure causing pain or undue discomfort or endangering plaintiff's life or health shall 

be used. The examination will be performed on plaintiff's head, neck, shoulders, back, arms, 

legs and any other areas potentially involved, as may be determined based upon the signs 

and symptoms of plaintiff.

3. Plaintiff will appear at the scheduled time for the defense medical examination, 

but will not be unduly inconvenienced by the defendant physician’s examination. If the 

defense examination has not commenced within sixty (60) minutes, plaintiff will consider 

this protracted delay to be a waiver of defendant’s right to the defense examination and will 

leave the examiner’s office. 

4. Plaintiff may be accompanied by his attorney or other legal representative.

5. No person other than plaintiff, his representative and the examining physician 

will be allowed to be present during the examination.

Case 2:14-cv-02053-WBS-CKD Document 28 Filed 10/22/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DEFENSE MEDICAL EXAMINATION

6. The examination must be limited to plaintiff’s physical condition that is in 

controversy in this action. Those conditions are the physical injuries he sustained on 

February 3, 2010.

7. Plaintiff will not submit to any x-rays, CT scans, MRI’s or any other 

radiographic studies.

8. The examination may not include any diagnostic test or procedure that is 

painful, protracted or intrusive.

9. Plaintiff demands a copy of any discoverable reports, records, reviews, 

examination charges and writings generated by Dr. Olson in this matter. This request 

includes a copy of any detailed written report, setting out any history, examination findings, 

results of all tests conducted, any diagnoses and prognosis of the examiners. A copy of these 

reports shall be delivered within thirty (30) days after examination, or within 15 day of trial, 

whichever is earlier.

10. All parties agree that this medical examination will be the only FRCP 35 

physical examination of plaintiff by the defendants. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: October 21, 2015 LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON,

DE HAAS, FESLER & AMES

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant

SUTTER DAVIS HOSPTIAL

By: /s/

LARRY THORNTON

Dated: October 21, 2015 RICE & BLOOMFIELD, LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ELICEO REHG, 

By: /s/

LINDA FERMOYLE RICE

Case 2:14-cv-02053-WBS-CKD Document 28 Filed 10/22/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DEFENSE MEDICAL EXAMINATION

Dated: October 21, 2015 SCHUERING ZIMMERMAN & DOYLE

Attorneys for Defendants

SUTTER WEST WOMEN’S HEALTH;

SUSAN K. MAAYAH, M.D.

By: /s/

KAT TODD

Dated: October 21, 2015 U.S. ATTORNEY

Attorneys for Defendant

THE UNITED STATES

By: /s/

GREG BRODERICK

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: October 22, 2015

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-02053-WBS-CKD Document 28 Filed 10/22/15 Page 4 of 4