Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-00702/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-00702-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CITY OF OAKLAND,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MARDECO, INC., et al.,

Defendants 

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS

 /

No. C-02-0702 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING THIRD PARTY

DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

TO LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On September 28, 2005, third-party defendant County of Oakland (“County”)

electronically filed its notice of motion and motion to approve a settlement. On September

30, 2005, County electronically filed an amended notice of motion. County has violated

General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the

Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are

filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked

‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and

‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also Standing Orders

For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

County is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

Case 3:02-cv-00702-MMC Document 88 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

documents. County is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the Court’s

Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court

may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2005 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:02-cv-00702-MMC Document 88 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2