Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-01833/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-01833-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

04cv1833

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERTO VERA JIMENEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. SAMBRANO, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 04cv1833-L(PCL)

ORDER CONTINUING PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE

On May 20, 2008, Defendants lodged a proposed pretrial order which does not bear

Plaintiff’s signature. Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(6) requires that the proposed pretrial order be

approved as to form and content by all parties. Accordingly, the proposed pretrial order lodged

on May 20, 2008 is REJECTED, and the pretrial conference, currently set on this court’s

calendar for May 27, 2008, is hereby CONTINUED to June 23, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT no later than June 16, 2008, the parties shall lodge

a proposed pretrial order which shall bear the signature of both sides, and in form and substance

comply with Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(6). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiff shall inform the court in writing no later

than June 16, 2008 whether he intends to appear at the pretrial conference telephonically or in

person. If Plaintiff intends to appear telephonically, he must provide the court with a telephone

number where he can be reached when the pretrial conference is called on the court’s calendar.

Case 3:04-cv-01833-L-PCL Document 159 Filed 05/21/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 04cv1833

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, in light of Plaintiff’s pro se status and

incarceration, Defendants’ counsel shall be responsible for preparing the proposed pretrial order,

arranging any further meetings attendant thereto, and following up so as to assure that Plaintiff’s

signature, if Plaintiff approves the form and content of the proposed pretrial order, and

information regarding attendance at the pretrial conference are obtained in a timely manner. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 21, 2008

M. James Lorenz

United States District Court Judge

COPY TO: 

HON. PETER C. LEWIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ALL PARTIES/COUNSEL

Case 3:04-cv-01833-L-PCL Document 159 Filed 05/21/08 Page 2 of 2