Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05559/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05559-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID B. JOHNSON, )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

)

E. ALAMEIDA, et al., )

)

)

Defendant. )

)

)

No. CV-F-04-5559 REC/WMW P

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION,

DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS, AND 

DENYING MOTION FOR

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

(Doc. 25) 

On January 30, 2006, United States Magistrate Judge

Wunderlich issued an Order dismissing plaintiff's Second Amended

Complaint and directing plaintiff to file a Third Amended

Complaint within 30 days of service of the Order. 

On February 21, 2006, plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal and

a Motion for Certificate of Appealability.

The court therefore concludes that plaintiff does not intend

to file a Third Amended Complaint and that this action is

dismissed. 

The court denies plaintiff's Motion for Certificate of

Case 1:04-cv-05559-REC -WMW Document 28 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Appealability as unnecessary. Plaintiff's action was brought

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A Certificate of Appealability is

required only in connection with appeals in actions seeking

habeas corpus relief. 

ACCORDINGLY:

1. This action is dismissed and the Clerk of the Court is

directed to enter judgment for defendants.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Certificate of Appealability is

denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05559-REC -WMW Document 28 Filed 02/24/06 Page 2 of 2