Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06264/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06264-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVYN DEVEREAUX,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EDWARD ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06264-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 13)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO

STATE ANY CLAIMS UPON WHICH

RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED (Doc.

10)

Plaintiff Kevyn Devereaux (“plaintiff”), a former state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. §

12132 (Americans with Disabilities Act), and 29 U. S. C. § 794

(Rehabilitation Act). The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On November 1, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that an objection to the Findings and

Recommendations, if any, was to be filed within thirty (30) days.

Case 1:04-cv-06264-AWI -SMS Document 14 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Findings and Recommendations was re-served on plaintiff on

December 14, 2005, due to a change in plaintiff’s address. To

date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of

this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the

record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 1, 2005,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for plaintiff’s

failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted under

section 1983, the ADA, or the RA.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 14, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06264-AWI -SMS Document 14 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2