Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01835/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01835-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 385
Nature of Suit: Property Damage - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DIANA R. LOTFI, ESQ. (SBN 252892)

FORAN GLENNON PALANDECH PONZI & RUDLOFF PC

450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 630

Newport Beach, CA 92660

Telephone: (949) 791-1060

Facsimile: (949) 791-1070

Attorney for Plaintiff THE MOUNTAIN CLUB OWNER’S

ASSOCIATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE MOUNTAIN CLUB OWNER’S 

ASSOCIATION,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, 

INC., 

 Defendant.

________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:13-CV-01835-WBS-KJN

STIPULATION & ORDER TO 

EXTEND TIME

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the Complaint on the undersigned Defendant on 

or about September 9, 2013; and

WHEREAS, Defendant has not previously requested an extension of time to

answer or move with respect to the Complaint;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned parties that Defendant's 

time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended to 

October 31, 2013.

Case 2:13-cv-01835-WBS-KJN Document 7 Filed 10/16/13 Page 1 of 4
2

STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: October 11, 2013 FORAN GLENNON PALANDECH PONZI & 

RUDLOFF PC

By: /s/

DIANA R. LOTFI

Attorney for Plaintiff, THE MOUNTAIN CLUB 

OWNER’S ASSOCIATION

Dated: October _11_, 2013 STOEL RIVES

By: /s/

 MICHAEL B. BROWN

 Attorney for Defendant, GRAYBAR ELECTRIC 

 COMPANY

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: October 15, 2013

Case 2:13-cv-01835-WBS-KJN Document 7 Filed 10/16/13 Page 2 of 4
3

STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AFFIDAVIT AND DECLARATION OF PROOF OF SERVICE

I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. I am 

employed by Foran Glennon Palandech Ponzi & Rudloff PC, whose business 

address is 450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 630, Newport Beach, California 92660 

(“the firm”). 

On October 11, 2013, I served the within document(s) described as: 

STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND TIME on the interested parties in this 

action by placing true copy(ies) thereof enclosed in sealed envelope(s) addressed as 

follows: 

● BY MAIL (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1013a(3))–I deposited such envelope(s) for 

processing in the mailroom in our offices. I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s 

practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited 

with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at 

Newport Beach, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on 

motion of a party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or 

postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in 

affidavit.

BY FAX (Code Civ. Proc. § 1013(a), (e); Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 2.306)–

By transmitting said document(s) by electronic facsimile at approximately .m. 

at 450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 630, California 92660, to the respective 

facsimile number(s) of the party(ies) as stated on the attached mailing list. The 

facsimile machine I used complied with California Rules of Court, Rule 2.301, and 

no error was reported by the machine. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 

2.306, I caused the machine to print a record of the transmission, a copy of which is 

attached to this declaration.

BY OVERNIGHT MAIL (Code Civ. Proc. § 1013(c))–I placed said 

envelope(s) for collection by ***Federal Express ***, following ordinary business 

practices, at the business offices of Foran Glennon Palandech Ponzi & Rudloff PC 

for collection and processing of correspondence with said overnight mail service, 

and said envelope(s) will be deposited with said overnight mail service on said date 

in the ordinary course of business. 

I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing of 

correspondence for service with said overnight mail service. It is deposited with 

said overnight mail service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I 

am aware that, on motion of a party served, service is presumed invalid if the said 

overnight delivery service cancellation date or delivery date on the overnight 

delivery service is more than one day after the date of deposit with said overnight 

delivery service contained in this affidavit.

BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION (Code Civ. Proc. § 

1010.6(a)(6))–Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept 

service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the document(s) to be sent to 

the persons at the e-mail addresses listed above. I did not receive, within a 

reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication 

that the transmission was unsuccessful.

(State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of 

California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on October 11, 2013, at Newport Beach, California.

 

CELIA M. CAMACHO

Case 2:13-cv-01835-WBS-KJN Document 7 Filed 10/16/13 Page 3 of 4
4

STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SERVICE LIST

Michael B. Brown

Stoel Rives LLP

10008 S.E. River Street

Truckee, CA 96161

Telephone: (530) 582-2282

Facsimile: (530) 582-2281

Email: mbbrown@stoel.com

Attorney for Defendant, GRAYBAR 

ELECTRIC COMPANY

Case 2:13-cv-01835-WBS-KJN Document 7 Filed 10/16/13 Page 4 of 4