Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00487/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00487-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 08-CV-00487 SC

PADB01 44044420.1 05-FEB-08 15:02

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MAYER BROWN LLP

Richard J. Favretto, Esq.

rfavretto@mayerbrown.com

John Roberti, Esq.

jroberti@mayerbrown.com

1909 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: (202) 263-3000

Facsimile: (202) 263-3300

MAYER BROWN LLP

Edward D. Johnson, Esq. (SBN 189475)

wjohnson@mayerbrown.com

J. Joann Liao, Esq. (SBN 227329)

jliao@mayerbrown.com

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300

3000 El Camino Real

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112

Telephone: (650) 331-2000

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060

Attorneys for Defendant United Air Lines, Inc.

Additional Counsel on Signature Page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JUSTIN LABARGE, individually and on behalf

of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

AIR NEW ZEALAND, ALL NIPPON

AIRWAYS, CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS,

CHINA AIRLINES, EVA AIRLINES, JAPAN

AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL, MALAYSIA

AIRLINES, NORTHWEST AIRLINES,

QANTAS AIRWAYS, SINGAPORE AIR,

THAI AIRWAYS, UNITED AIR LINES

Defendants.

Case No. 08-cv-00487 SC

JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO

LOCAL RULE 6-1 EXTENDING TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

The Honorable Samuel Conti

Case 3:08-cv-00487-CRB Document 6 Filed 02/06/08 Page 1 of 3
2

JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 08-CV-00487 SC

PADB01 44044420.1 05-FEB-08 15:02

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), and in light of the related “Motion for Transfer and

Consolidation of Related Actions to the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1407” now pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”), Plaintiff

Justin LaBarge (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant United Air Lines, Inc. (“Defendant”), through

counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant’s time to answer,

move or otherwise plead is enlarged until the later of: (1) the date when Defendant would

otherwise be required to a file a response pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12; or (2)

45 days after the JPML grants, denies, or otherwise disposes of the pending motion. If a

consolidated amended complaint is filed by Plaintiff in a single transferee Court and served on

Defendant, Defendant’s time to answer, move, or otherwise plead is enlarged until 45 days after

such service.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that defense counsel shall

accept service on behalf of Defendant of the summons and complaints in the above-captioned

matter, including any amended or consolidated complaints, and further, that Defendant shall not

contest sufficiency of process or service of process. This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver

of any other defense including, but not limited to, the defenses of lack of personal or subject

matter jurisdiction or improper venue. Nothing in this paragraph shall obligate Defendant to

answer, move, or otherwise respond to any complaint until the time provided in the preceding

paragraph. The above notwithstanding, should Defendant, except pursuant to court order,

respond to any complaint in a related matter filed in another United States District Court prior to

the date contemplated by this stipulation, then Defendant shall make a simultaneous response to

the complaint in the above-captioned matter.

//

//

//

//

Case 3:08-cv-00487-CRB Document 6 Filed 02/06/08 Page 2 of 3
3

JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 08-CV-00487 SC

PADB01 44044420.1 05-FEB-08 15:02

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: February 5, 2008 MAYER BROWN LLP

By: /s/ J. Joann Liao

MAYER BROWN LLP

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300

3000 El Camino Real

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112

Telephone: (650) 331-2000

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060

Counsel for Defendant United Air Lines, Inc.

Dated: February 5, 2008 SAVERI & SAVERI, INC.

By: _____Cadio Zirpoli (by authorization)__

SAVERI & SAVERI, INC.

111 Pine Street, Suite 1700

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 217-6810

Facsimile: (415) 217-6813

Counsel for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:08-cv-00487-CRB Document 6 Filed 02/06/08 Page 3 of 3