Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04255/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04255-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Irwin B. Schwartz (SBN 141140) 

John V. Komar (SBN 169662) 

Business Litigation Associates, P.C. 

2033 Gateway Place, Suite 500 

San Jose, California 95110 

Telephone: 408-947-9099 

Facsimile: 408-947-9001 

Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party 

Plaintiff Riverdeep, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CADSOFT CORPORATION, a foreign 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

RIVERDEEP INC., LLC, a Delaware 

Limited Liability Company, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C06-4255 SC 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 

HEARING DATE ON CADSOFT 

CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 

Hon: Samuel Conti 

RIVERDEEP, LLC, a Delaware Limited 

Liability Company, 

 Third-Party Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Punch Software, LLC, a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Third-Party Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 

Stipulation and Order 1 C06 4255 SC 

Case 3:06-cv-04255-SC Document 45 Filed 04/24/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Cadsoft Corporation (“Cadsoft”) and Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff Riverdeep 

Inc., LLC (“Riverdeep”), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows: 

1. Cadsoft filed a motion for summary adjudication, which was set for hearing on 

April 27, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1. 

2. The parties submitted a stipulation extending the hearing date one week, until 

May 4, 2 007 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1. The parties further agreed that Riverdeep’s time to 

file an opposition to Cadsoft’s motion would also extended for one week, as would be Cadsoft’s 

time to file a reply brief. Riverdeep’s opposition was to be due on April 13, 2007, and Cadsoft’s 

reply brief would be due April 20, 2007. 

3. On April 11, 2007, the court clerk called counsel for Riverdeep and instructed 

him that May 4, 2007 was not an available hearing date. Counsel have conferred and agree to 

reset the motion for May 11, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. Riverdeep’s opposition is due April 13, 2007 

and Cadsoft’s reply is due on April 27, 2007. 

Dated: April 12, 2007 Business Litigation Associates, P.C. 

 _______/s/_____________________ 

John V. Komar 

Irwin B. Schwartz 

Counsel for Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff 

Riverdeep, Inc., LLC 

 

Dated: April 12, 2007 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 

 ____________/s/________________ 

P. Craig Cardon 

Counsel for Plaintiff Cadsoft Corporation 

I, John v. Komar, attest that P. Craig Cardon, counsel for plaintiff Cadsoft Corporation, has 

/// 

/// 

Stipulation and Order 2 C06 4255 SC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:06-cv-04255-SC Document 45 Filed 04/24/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

concurred in the filing of this document. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________ __________________________________ 

 United States District Judge 

Stipulation and Order 3 C06 4255 SC 

Case 3:06-cv-04255-SC Document 45 Filed 04/24/07 Page 3 of 3