Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03814/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03814-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIN WAH KUNG,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITIBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Defendant. /

No. C 16-03814 WHA

REQUEST REGARDING

HEARING ON MOTION TO

DISMISS

The parties are requested to bring a copy of the monthly statement that provided notice

of the increased APR to tomorrow’s hearing.

The parties should be prepared to discuss plaintiff’s standing to assert a claim given that

his second amended complaint alleges that a review “revealed that none of Plaintiff’s

outstanding balance is subject to the Penalty APR” (SAC ¶ 20).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 28, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-03814-WHA Document 35 Filed 09/28/16 Page 1 of 1