Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-06185/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-06185-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER 

CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michael Liu Su (Cal. Bar No. 300590) 

michael.liu.su@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice) 

lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com 

Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice) 

bradford.schulz@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

Two Freedom Square 

11955 Freedom Drive 

Reston, VA 20190 

Telephone: (571) 203-2700 

Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ZTE (USA) Inc. 

Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751) 

shartman@brownrudnick.com 

Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice) 

afabricant@brownrudnick.com 

Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice) 

plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com 

Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice) 

vrubino@brownrudnick.com 

Brown Rudnick LLP 

7 Times Square 

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 209-4800 

Facsimile: (212) 209-4801 

Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787) 

asivakumar@brownrudnick.com 

Brown Rudnick LLP 

2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor 

Irvine, California 92612 

Telephone: (949) 752-7100 

Facsimile: (949) 252-1514 

Attorneys for Defendant AGIS SOFTWARE 

DEVELOPMENT LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

ZTE (USA) INC., 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 vs. 

AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC, 

 Defendant(s). 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case Number: 4:18-cv-06185-HSG 

(Former Case No. 2:17-cv-00517-JRG) (E.D. 

Tex.) 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND 

SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 73) AND 

EXTEND ADR DEADLINE (DKT. 56) 

(As Modified)

Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 92 Filed 06/21/19 Page 1 of 5
1 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER 

CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING 

ORDER AND EXTEND ADR DEADLINE 

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, and 

the Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. 73) and the Order re: ADR Deadline (Dkt. 56), Plaintiff ZTE 

(USA) Inc. (“ZTE”) and Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software”) 

(collectively, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, on April 4, 2019, to allow sufficient time for the Parties to complete 

mediation, the Court granted the Parties’ request to extend the ADR deadline from April 17, 

2019 to June 21, 2019 (Dkt. 56); 

WHEREAS, on April 15, 2019, the Court signed and entered an amended Scheduling 

Order (Dkt. 63), which modified the previous Scheduling Order (Dkt. 25); 

WHEREAS, on May 17, 2019, to allow the Parties time to confer regarding the Parties’ 

discovery disputes, the Court granted the Parties’ request to extend Plaintiff’s Invalidity 

Contentions and Plaintiff’s Production from May 20, 2019 to June 3, 2019; and the Court 

granted the Parties’ request to extend the Parties’ Exchange of Proposed Claim terms from June 

3, 2019 to June 10, 2019; 

 WHEREAS, the parties were scheduled to conduct mediation on June 4, 2019 with Hon. 

James Ware (Ret.) as mediator, however, due to a medical emergency of mediator, the Parties 

were unable to complete mediation on that date; 

WHEREAS, the next available date for both Parties and the mediator is in August 2019, 

which is after the current June 21, 2019 ADR mediation deadline; 

WHEREAS, to allow sufficient time for the Parties to complete the rescheduled 

mediation, the Parties have agreed that good cause exists to extend the ADR deadline to August 

23, 2019; 

WHEREAS, on June 14, 2019, the Parties met and conferred in Magistrate Judge 

Spero’s courtroom to discuss certain discovery disputes; 

Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 92 Filed 06/21/19 Page 2 of 5
2 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER 

CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, to allow the Parties time to resolve such discovery disputes as agreed 

during the meet and confer, the Parties have agreed that good cause exists to extend the 

discovery deadlines as described below; 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and 

Defendant, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the upcoming deadlines set forth in 

the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 73) be modified as follows: 

Event Previous Dates Amended Dates 

 

Exchange Preliminary Claim 

Constructions and Extrinsic 

Evidence 

June 24, 2019 August 2, 2019 

Damages Contentions July 1, 2019 August 9, 2019 

Joint Claim Construction and 

Prehearing Statement 

July 3, 2019 August 13, 2019 

Exchange Expert Declarations 

in Support of Claim 

Construction, if Any

July 3, 2019 August 13, 2019 

Responsive Damages 

Contentions 

July 29, 2019 September 6, 2019 

Complete Claim Construction 

Discovery

August 5, 2019 September 13, 2019 

Submit Opening Claim 

Construction Brief 

August 20, 2019 September 30, 2019 

Submit Responsive Claim 

Construction Brief 

September 3, 2019 October 14, 2019 

Submit Reply Claim 

Construction Brief 

September 10, 2019 October 21, 2019 

Claim Construction Hearing October 2, 2019; 1:00 p.m. November 12, 2019; 1:00 

p.m. 

 

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff 

and Defendant, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the deadline to complete ADR, 

currently set for June 21, 2019 (Dkt. 56), shall be continued to August 23, 2019. 

 

Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 92 Filed 06/21/19 Page 3 of 5
3 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER 

CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: June 19, 2019 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Michael Liu Su 

Michael Liu Su (Cal. Bar No. 300590) 

michael.liu.su@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice) 

lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com 

Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice) 

bradford.schulz@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

Two Freedom Square 

11955 Freedom Drive 

Reston, VA 20190 

Telephone: (571) 203-2700 

Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ZTE (USA) Inc. 

Dated: June 19, 2019 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Sarah G. Hartman 

Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751) 

shartman@brownrudnick.com 

Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice) 

afabricant@brownrudnick.com 

Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice) 

plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com 

Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice) 

vrubino@brownrudnick.com 

Brown Rudnick LLP 

7 Times Square 

Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 92 Filed 06/21/19 Page 4 of 5
4 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER 

CASE NO. 18-cv-06185-HSG 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

New York, NY 10036 

Telephone: (212) 209-4800 

Facsimile: (212) 209-4801 

Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787) 

asivakumar@brownrudnick.com 

Brown Rudnick LLP 

2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor 

Irvine, California 92612 

Telephone: (949) 752-7100 

Facsimile: (949) 252-1514 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC 

ATTESTATION 

I, Michael Liu Su, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from each of the other Signatories indicated by a confirmed signature (/s/) within this efiled document. 

/s/ Michael Liu Su 

Michael Liu Su 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, 

Dated: ___________________ __________________________________ 

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. 

U.S. District Court Judge 

Northern District of California 

except the claim construction hearing will be held on November 20, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. 6/21/2019

Case 4:18-cv-06185-HSG Document 92 Filed 06/21/19 Page 5 of 5