Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00664/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00664-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM JAMES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0664 DAD P

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Recent court documents were served on plaintiff's address of record and returned

by the postal service as undeliverable. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local

Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any

address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to

randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's

failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

Case 2:10-cv-00664-MCE-AC Document 6 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 6, 2010.

DAD:9:md

jame0664.33a

Case 2:10-cv-00664-MCE-AC Document 6 Filed 04/06/10 Page 2 of 2