Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02885/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02885-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GABRIEL ALBERTO CABRERA 

BLANCO, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:24-cv-2885 AC 

ORDER 

 This case is before the undersigned for all purposes on the parties’ consent. ECF No. 8. 

On December 16, 2024, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, set to be heard on the papers 

February 12, 2025. ECF Nos. 9, 10. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), plaintiffs’ opposition was 

due within 14 days of the motion being filed, in this case December 30, 2024. Plaintiffs did not 

file an opposition or statement of non-opposition. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs shall show cause, in 

writing, within 14 days, why the failure to respond to the pending motion should not result in a 

recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an opposition 

or statement of non-opposition within this timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this 

order. If plaintiff fails to respond, the case will be dismissed pursuant to Local Civil Rule 110. 

DATED: January 6, 2025 

Case 2:24-cv-02885-AC Document 12 Filed 01/07/25 Page 1 of 1