Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06583/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06583-53/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRY D. HAMILTON, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. )

)

)

HENRY W. WILLMS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F 02-6583 AWI SMS

ORDER GRATING MOTION FOR

ENLARGEMENT OF TIME

ORDER VACATING MAY 21, 2007

HEARING DATE

Plaintiff Terry Hamilton and Plaintiff Sharon Hamilton (“Plaintiffs”) have filed motions

for reconsideration of the court’s order enforcing the December 4, 2006 oral stipulation. The

motion for reconsideration was set for hearing on May 21, 2007. On May 14, 2007, Plaintiffs

filed a motion for an enlargement of time to file a reply to Defendants’ opposition to their

motion. Plaintiffs ask that they be allowed to file a motion up to May 16, 2007. On May 15,

2007, Defendants filed an opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion.

Despite the many procedural irregularities found in Plaintiffs’ motion for an enlargement

of time, the court will allow Plaintiffs to file a late reply. Plaintiffs are currently representing

themselves in this action, and Plaintiffs have asked for a very short extension. Further, the court

has reviewed the pending motion, opposition, and the applicable law, and has determined that the

motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 78-230(h). Because the

May 21, 2007 hearing is being vacated, allowing a late reply will not greatly delay the court’s

ruling on the pending motion or prejudice the parties. 

Case 1:02-cv-06583-AWI-SMS Document 608 Filed 05/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The previously set hearing date of May 21, 2007, is VACATED, and no

party shall appear at that time;

2. Plaintiffs’ motion for an enlargement of time to file a reply is GRANTED;

3. Plaintiffs may file any reply by 4:00 p.m. on May 17, 2007;

4. As of May 21, 2007, the court will take the motion for reconsideration

under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to ensure that a copy of this order is

served on Plaintiffs at the following address:

Terry D. Hamilton

1502 Westbrook Court

Modesto, CA 95358

Sharon M. Hamilton

1502 Westbrook Court

Modesto, CA 95358

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 16, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06583-AWI-SMS Document 608 Filed 05/17/07 Page 2 of 2