Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_22-cv-01048/USCOURTS-ared-4_22-cv-01048-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

CENTRAL DIVISION

BRADLEY R. DEWEESE, PLAINTIFF

ADC #552216

v. 4:22CV01048-DPM-JTK

WHITE, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

After screening Bradley R. DeWeese’s (“Plaintiff”) Amended Complaint (Doc. Nos. 6, 7) 

pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act,1 the Court ordered service of Plaintiff’s claims 

against Defendants Hussein and Parker, among others. (Doc. No. 8). On January 26, 2023, 

summonses for Defendants Hussein and Parker were returned unexecuted. (Doc. Nos. 20, 21). 

The Court asked Plaintiff for a valid service address for Defendants Hussein and Parker. 

(Doc. No. 22). Plaintiff responded, asking for a last known address from the Pulaski County 

Detention Center. (Doc. No. 23). Plaintiff also “noticed that the federal marshals served a[n] 

officer Kyra Jones . . . that is the wrong officer Jones!” (Id.). Plaintiff explained that “[t]here is 

a Mr. Jones that works 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift / B-shift.” (Id.). Mr. Jones who works the B-shift 

appears to be the Mr. Jones that Plaintiff intended to sue.

Based on Plaintiff’s Response, service on Kyra Jones is set aside. Counsel for Defendants 

White, Conners, Jackson, Calloway, Dennis, Madrigal, Jones, and Clark is requested to obtain 

from the Pulaski County Detention Center the first name of “Mr. Jones that works 3 p.m. to 11 

p.m. shift / B-shift,” if identifiable. Counsel is further requested to provide under seal a last 

1 The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) requires federal courts to screen prisoner 

complaints seeking relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(a).

Case 4:22-cv-01048-DPM Document 24 Filed 03/01/23 Page 1 of 2
2

known address for Defendants Hussein and Parker, if one exists. The Court requests this 

information within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. 

The Court notes that if Defendants Hussein, Parker, and Jones cannot be served if a timely 

manner, Plaintiff’s claims against these Defendants may be dismissed. See Lee v. Armontrout, 

991 F.2d 487, 489 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m) (any defendant not 

served within ninety (90) days after the filing of the Complaint is subject to dismissal without 

prejudice). 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of March, 2023.

____________________________________

JEROME T. KEARNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-01048-DPM Document 24 Filed 03/01/23 Page 2 of 2