Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-00083/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-00083-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOMINIC (AKA DIAMOND) VARGAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:20-cv-00083-JLT-CDB (PC)

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POSTSCREENING ADR AND STAYING CASE 

FOR 90 DAYS

45-DAY DEADLINE

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE CONSENT/DECLINE FORM

7-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Dominic Vargas, also known as Diamond Vargas, is a state prisoner proceeding 

pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Following screening of Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, this action proceeds on 

Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical indifference claims (Claim I) against Defendants Leslie 

Taylor, Robert Mitchell, Stephanie Neumann, Tristan Buzzini, and Shama Chaiken, and on his 

Fourteenth Amendment due process claim (Claim II) against Defendant Jeff Macomber. (See

Doc. 35.) Defendants responded to the third amended complaint with an amended answer on 

March 13, 2024. (Doc. 47.)

The Court refers all civil rights cases filed by pro se inmates to Alternative Dispute 

Case 1:20-cv-00083-JLT-CDB Document 48 Filed 03/14/24 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Resolution (“ADR”) to attempt to resolve such cases more expeditiously and less expensively. 

The Court stays this action for ninety days to allow the parties to investigate Plaintiff’s 

claims, meet and confer, and participate in an early settlement conference. The Court presumes 

that all post-screening civil rights cases assigned to the undersigned will proceed to a settlement 

conference. However, if, after investigating Plaintiff’s claims and meeting and conferring, either 

party finds that a settlement conference would be a waste of resources, the party may opt out of 

the early settlement conference. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED:

1. This action is STAYED for ninety (90) days to allow the parties an opportunity to settle 

their dispute before the discovery process begins. No pleadings or motions may be filed 

in this case during the stay EXCEPT for Defendants’ filing of the consent/decline form 

addressed below (see infra). The parties shall not engage in formal discovery, but they 

may engage in informal discovery to prepare for the settlement conference.

2. Within 45 days from the date of this Order, the parties SHALL file the attached notice, 

indicating their agreement to proceed to an early settlement conference or their belief that 

settlement is not achievable at this time.

3. Within 60 days from the date of this Order, the assigned Deputy Attorney General 

SHALL contact the undersigned’s Courtroom Deputy Clerk at shall@caed.uscourts.gov 

to schedule the settlement conference, assuming the parties agree to participate in an 

early settlement conference.

4. If the parties reach a settlement during the stay of this action, they SHALL file a Notice 

of Settlement as required by Local Rule 160.

5. The Clerk of the Court SHALL serve via email copies of Plaintiff’s third amended 

complaint (Doc. 33), the Court’s operative Screening Order (Doc. 34), and this Order to 

Supervising Deputy Attorney General Lawrence Bragg (Lawrence.Bragg@doj.ca.gov), 

and a copy of this Order to ADR Coordinator Sujean Park.

6. The parties are obligated to keep the Court informed of their current addresses during the 

stay and the pendency of this action. Changes of address must be reported promptly in a 

Case 1:20-cv-00083-JLT-CDB Document 48 Filed 03/14/24 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Notice of Change of Address. See L.R. 182(f).

And it is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file a completed Consent / 

Decline of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form within seven (7) days of the date of entry of 

this order (see Doc. 4-1 & 10).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 14, 2024 ___________________ _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00083-JLT-CDB Document 48 Filed 03/14/24 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOMINIC (AKA DIAMOND) VARGAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:20-cv-00083-JLT-CDB (PC)

NOTICE REGARDING EARLY 

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

1. The party or counsel agrees that an early settlement conference would be productive and 

wishes to engage in an early settlement conference.

Yes ____ No ____

2. Plaintiff (check one):

_____ would like to participate in the settlement conference in person.

_____ would like to participate in the settlement conference by telephone or video 

conference.

Dated: ________________________________

Plaintiff or Counsel for Defendants

Case 1:20-cv-00083-JLT-CDB Document 48 Filed 03/14/24 Page 4 of 4