Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06409/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06409-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONROE WALTER BURNS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

A.P. KANE, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:04-cv-06409-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 17)

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO STAY

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS (Doc. 15)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On July 27, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that Petitioner's request to stay the Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED. These Findings and

Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice

that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from

the date of service of that order. On August 25, 2005, Petitioner

filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

Case 1:04-cv-06409-LJO -DLB Document 19 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 27, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Petitioner's request to stay the Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus, filed July 25, 2005, is DENIED; and,

3. The action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for

further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 1, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06409-LJO -DLB Document 19 Filed 09/02/05 Page 2 of 2