Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03553/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03553-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

Frederick Alexander, 

 CASE NO. 16-cv-03553-MEJ 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company 

of Oakland, 

 Defendant. 

____________________________________/ 

 

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

 Court Processes:

☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

 X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

 Private Process: 

☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) 

______________________ 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process.

 

 _____________________________________________ 

Dated: August 30, 2016. /s/ Mark F. Anderson

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

See attached page 3 for additional counsel. 

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE 

Case 3:16-cv-03553-MEJ Document 10 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER

☐ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

☐ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: 

 ______________________________

 UNITED STATES JUDGE

 

 

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

 

Rev. 12/11 

 

X

August 31, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Maria-Elena James

Case 3:16-cv-03553-MEJ Document 10 Filed 08/31/16 Page 2 of 3
Page 2 to Stipulation to ADR in Alexander v Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company, No. 16-03553 

MEJ 

s/ Mark F. Anderson 

Mark F. Anderson (SBN 44787) 

Anderson, Ogilvie & Brewer LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, Suite 914 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Ph: (415) 651-1951 

Fax: (415) 500-8300 

mark@aoblawyers.com

/s/ Alexis Kent

Alexis Kent 

BEYERS COSTIN SIMON 

200 Fifth Street, Suite 400, POB 878 

Santa Rosa, CA 95402-0878 

Ph: 707.547.2000 

Fax: 707.526.2746 

akent@beyerscostin.com

FILER ATTESTATION

 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i)(3), I, Mark F. Anderson attest under penalty of 

perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all of the 

signatories. 

Dated: August 30, 2016. 

 /s/ Mark F. Anderson 

 Mark F. Anderson 

Case 3:16-cv-03553-MEJ Document 10 Filed 08/31/16 Page 3 of 3