Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00836/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00836-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIM ALLEN LA CHAPPELLE, 

Petitioner, 2:07-cv-0836-GEB-GGH-P

vs.

ADAMS, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 7, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. On August

20, 2007, petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In the objections,

petitioner states that he is clarifying dates discussed in the finding and recommendations. The

clarification of these dates does not materially alter the analysis in the findings and

recommendations. Petitioner also indicates that he does not object to the magistrate judge’s

recommendations.

Case 2:07-cv-00836-JLR Document 8 Filed 08/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 7, 2007, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is administratively stayed pending petitioner’s exhaustion of state

court remedies.

Dated: August 30, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-00836-JLR Document 8 Filed 08/30/07 Page 2 of 2