Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235-62/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING POWER INTEGRATIONS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

Case No. 09-cv-05235- MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., 

a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and 

SYSTEM GENERAL CORPORATION, a 

Taiwanese corporation, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 09-cv-05235- MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFF POWER INTEGRATIONS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL ITS MOTION IN LIMINE

NOS. 1-2, 4-7, AND CERTAIN EXHIBITS 

IN SUPPORT THEREOF 

Case3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document364-2 Filed01/15/14 Page1 of 3

IN PART ^

 ; DIRECTIONS 

TO PLAINTIFF

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 426 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 3
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING POWER INTEGRATIONS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

Case No. 09-cv-05235- MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Power Integrations, Inc. (“Power Integrations”) filed a Motion for Administrative 

Relief with this Court on January 15, 2014, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 for permission to file 

under seal portions of its Motions in Limine Nos. 1-2 and 4-7 and to file under seal in their entirety 

certain supporting exhibits to its Motions in Limine Nos. 1-2 and 5-7. 

Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Power Integrations’ request to 

file under seal the designated portions of the following documents: 

• Plaintiff Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude Testimony and 

Evidence Regarding Apple Inc. (“Motion in Limine No. 1”); 

• Plaintiff Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude Any Testimony 

About Fairchild Products Allegedly Practicing the ’977 Patent (“Motion in Limine

No. 2”); 

• Plaintiff Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 4 to Preclude Dr. Wei's Opinions 

and Testimony Relying on Testing by Fairchild Engineers Eddie Chueh and WeiHsuan Huang (“Motion in Limine No. 4”); 

• Plaintiff Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 5 to Preclude Testimony that the 

“Control Circuit” of the ’908 Patent Claims Requires a Current Comparator 

(“Motion in Limine No. 5”); 

• Plaintiff Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 6 to Preclude Testimony 

Requiring Proof of Actual Operation of the Apparatus Claim of the ’079 Patent to 

Establish Infringement (“Motion in Limine No. 6”); and 

• Plaintiff Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 7 to Preclude Testimony That the 

Claimed “Multi-Function Circuit” Limitation Can Be Met by a Circuit Performing 

Only a Single Function (“Motion in Limine No. 7”). 

Additionally, the Court hereby GRANTS Power Integrations’ request to file under seal in 

their entirety the following documents: 

• Exhibits A, B, and C to Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 1; 

• Exhibits A, E, F, and G to Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 2; 

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 426 Filed 01/29/14 Page 2 of 3 Case3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document364-2 Filed01/15/14 Page2 of 3
3

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING POWER INTEGRATIONS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

Case No. 09-cv-05235- MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

• Exhibits A and B to Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 5; 

• Exhibits A and C to Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 6; and 

• Exhibits A and B to Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 7. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________, 2013 

____________________________________ 

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document364-2 Filed01/15/14 Page3 of 3

Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public record, no later than February 3, 2014, 

the following documents, as the designating party no longer contends they are confidential: 

 • Plaintiff Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 4 to Preclude Dr. Wei’s 

Opinions and Testimony Relying on Testing by Fairchild Engineers Eddie Chueh 

and Wei-Hsuan Huang (“Motion in Limine No. 4”); 

 • Plaintiff Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 7 to Preclude Testimony That 

the Claimed “Multi-Function Circuit” Limitation Can Be Met by a Circuit 

Performing Only a Single Function (“Motion in Limine No. 7”); and 

 • Exhibits A and B to Power Integrations’ Motion in Limine No. 7.

January 29, 2014

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 426 Filed 01/29/14 Page 3 of 3