Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01259/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01259-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 20:1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARIM ABDELLA and PATRICIA 

ABDELLA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FOLSOM CORDOVA UNIFIED 

SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant.

No. 2:14-cv-1259 KJM DAD PS

ORDER

Plaintiffs Karim Abdella and Patricia Abdella are proceeding pro se in the above entitled 

action. The action has therefore been referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 

302(c)(21) for all purposes encompassed by that rule.

On December 19, 2014, defendant filed a letter requesting a further extension of the 

December 19, 2014 deadline for the lodging of the administrative record in this action. (Dkt. No. 

18.) Therein, defendant explains that the “parties are still in the process of working through 

issues,” some of which “are complex,” and that the defendant is attempting to locate some 

evidence that may be missing from the administrative record. (Id. at 1.) Defendant explains that 

their request was submitted by letter instead of by way of a stipulation and proposed order 

/////

/////

Case 2:14-cv-01259-KJM-AC Document 19 Filed 01/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

because the defendant was “unable to get a stipulation executed prior to the lodging deadline.”1 

(Id.) Defendant requests the deadline be extended to January 30, 2015. 

Good cause appearing, the request for a further extension of time will be granted. No 

further extensions of time for this purpose will be granted absent a substantial showing of good 

cause. Moreover, as a result of the further extension of time, the schedule set forth in the court’s 

October 15, 2014 order will likely have to be amended.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Defendant’s December 19, 2014 request for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 18) is 

granted;

2. A copy of the administrative record shall be lodged with the court, and served upon the 

plaintiffs, on or before January 30, 2015;

3. On or before February 6, 2015, each party may, but is not required to, file a proposed 

amended schedule with respect to further proceedings in this action. 

Dated: January 8, 2015

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.pro se\abdella1259.eot.ord.docx

 

1

 Defendant’s letter reflects that the pro se plaintiffs were informed of the contents of the letter 

and that a copy of the letter was served on the plaintiffs. Neither plaintiff has filed an objection to 

the defendant’s letter request for an extension of time. The court has construed the lack of 

objection to be a reflection of plaintiffs’ non-opposition to the request.

Case 2:14-cv-01259-KJM-AC Document 19 Filed 01/09/15 Page 2 of 2