Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01976/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01976-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Vanalbert Siegrist is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 4, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 

Recommendation which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that 

objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty days. No objections 

were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

VANALBERT SIEGRIST,

 Plaintiff,

v.

J.J. JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01976-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING 

DEFENDANT DUTRA’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDMENT, DISMISSING DUTRA 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING 

DEFENDANT STRINGER TO FILE RESPONSE 

TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

[ECF Nos. 32, 40, 53]

Case 1:10-cv-01976-LJO-SAB Document 55 Filed 07/22/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on June 4, 2015, is adopted in full;

2. Defendant Dutra’s December 15, 2014, motion for summary judgment is DENIED as 

MOOT; 

3. Defendant Dutra’s February 25, 2015, motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;

4. Defendant Dutra is DISMISSED from the action without prejudice; and

5. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Defendant Stringer shall 

file a response to the second amended complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 22, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01976-LJO-SAB Document 55 Filed 07/22/15 Page 2 of 2