Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00725/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00725-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YOUNG YIL JO,

Plaintiff, 1:10 CV 00725 AWI MJS (PC) 

vs. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a prisoner in the custody of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons at the Federal

Airpark Unit Correctional Institution in Big Spring, Texas. To date, Plaintiff has filed over

seventy civil cases in this district. Plaintiff is an abusive litigant who persists in filing baseless

actions in this district. The complaint in this action is duplicative of at least seven previous

complaints filed this year. There is no good faith basis for the filing of duplicative actions. In

1

The Court takes judicial notice of case numbers 07-CV-0075 LJO DLB P, Jo v. Six 1

Unknown Named Agents, 07-CV-0315 LJO NEW P, Jo v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 07-CV0402 AWI SMS P, Jo v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 07-CV-0476 OWW SMS P, Jo v. Six

Unknown Named Agents, 07-CV-0766 AWI NEW P, Jo v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 07-CV0159 AWI SMS P, Jo v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 07-CV-0848 OWW NEW P, Jo v. Six

Unknown Named Agents. 

1

Case 1:10-cv-00725-AWI-MJS Document 2 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

addition, the complaint itself fails to state any cognizable claims under federal law, as it is

rambling and nonsensical. 

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00725-AWI-MJS Document 2 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 2