Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-24-13603/USCOURTS-ca11-24-13603-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-13603

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

MATTHEW A. TOBIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

OKALOOSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 

FLORIDA STATE PRISON, 

CHARLOTTE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 

SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX, 

Defendants-Appellees.

USCA11 Case: 24-13603 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 12/27/2024 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 24-13603

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 3:24-cv-00356-MCR-HTC

____________________

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Matthew Tobin, pro se, appeals directly from three different 

magistrate judge rulings: (1) the October 7, 2024 order denying his 

request for injunctive relief, striking his “Amendment to Defendants,” and ordering him to file a second amended complaint; (2) the 

October 21, 2024 order denying his motion for default judgment; 

and (3) the November 5 report and recommendation (“R&R”) that 

his complaint be dismissed. 

None of these rulings is immediately appealable. The district court has not adopted the orders or otherwise rendered them 

final. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 

1061, 1066-67 (11th Cir. 1982) (explaining that a magistrate judge 

order issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) is not final and may not 

be appealed until rendered final by a district court); Perez-Priego v. 

Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148 F.3d 1272, 1273 (11th Cir. 1998) (holding that a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that has 

not been adopted by the district court is not final and immediately 

appealable). And its subsequent adoption of the R&R, after Tobin 

USCA11 Case: 24-13603 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 12/27/2024 Page: 2 of 3
24-13603 Opinion of the Court 3

appealed, does not cure the premature appeal from the R&R itself. 

See Perez-Priego, 148 F.3d at 1273. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction 

to review any of the rulings.

All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for 

rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other 

requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules. 

USCA11 Case: 24-13603 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 12/27/2024 Page: 3 of 3