Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01859/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01859-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARKLAND LLOYD GASSOWAY,

Petitioner,

v.

K. MENDOZA-POWERS, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 06-1859 AWI DLB HC

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTIONS

AS UNNECESSARY

[Docs. 3, 4]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On December 21, 2006, Petitioner filed a two motions entitled “Motion for Ruling” and

“Motion to Consolidate pending appeal.” (Court Docs. 3, 4.) 

In his motions, Petitioner requests that the Court review the exhibits attached to his

motions when making a ruling on his petition. On January 23, 2007, the Court directed

Petitioner to file an amended petition. (Court Doc. 10.) Petitioner filed an amended petition on

February 21, 2007. On May 2, 2007, the Court directed Respondent to file a response to the

petition. (Court Doc. 12.) 

Petitioner is advised that the Court has reviewed and will continue to review any and all

exhibits submitted to the Court when issuing a ruling on the instant petition. Thus, Petitioner’s

motions are DISREGARDED as UNNECESSARY. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 29, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01859-DLB Document 14 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 1