Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00209/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00209-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The Court notes that the recent Supreme Court's opinion of Rhines v. Weber,

has no application to this case as there has been no request to stay the petition

pending exhaustion. Rhines v. Weber, 125 S.Ct. 1528 (2005). 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN DOUGLAS BAXTER, JR., )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

PEOPLE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-00209-REC-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 7)

ORDER DEEMING PETITION

SUBJECT TO DISMISSAL AS

A MIXED PETITION

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER

LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION TO

WITHDRAW THE UNEXHAUSTED

CLAIMS PRIOR TO DISMISSAL

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On March 22, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and

Recommendation that the instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

is subject to dismissal as a mixed petition, and granting

Petitioner leave to file a motion to withdraw the unexhausted

claims prior to dismissal.1 This Report and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were

Case 1:05-cv-00209-REC-DLB Document 9 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of

that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections

to the Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is supported by

the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed March 22, 2005, is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is subject

to dismissal as a mixed petition; and,

3. Petitioner is granted leave to file a motion to withdraw

the unexhausted claims prior to dismissal, within thirty (30) days

from the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 17, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00209-REC-DLB Document 9 Filed 05/18/05 Page 2 of 2