Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03277/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03277-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES BIRD,

Plaintiff,

v.

KKMI SAUSALITO, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-03277-MEJ 

ORDER RE: STATEMENT OF FACTS

On April 20, 2016, Keefe Kaplan Maritime, Inc. filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, 

(Dkt. No. 79), but failed to file a statement of facts in compliance with paragraph G of the Case 

Management Order in this case. Pursuant to paragraph G, all summary judgment motions must 

include the following:

(1) Separate Statement of Facts. Any party filing a motion for 

summary judgment must file a statement, separate from the motion 

and memorandum of law, setting forth each material fact on which 

the party relies in support of the motion. Each material fact in the 

separate statement must be set forth in a separately numbered 

paragraph and must refer to a specific admissible portion of the 

record where the fact finds support (for example, affidavit, 

deposition, discovery response, etc.). A failure to submit a separate 

statement of facts in this form may constitute grounds for the denial 

of the motion.

(2) Controverting Statement of Facts. Any party opposing a motion 

for summary judgment must file a statement, separate from that 

party’s memorandum of law, setting forth: (a) for each paragraph of 

the moving party’s separate statement of facts, a correspondingly 

numbered paragraph indicating whether the party disputes the 

statement of fact set forth in that paragraph and a reference to the 

specific admissible portion of the record supporting the party’s 

position if the fact is disputed; and (b) any additional facts that 

establish a genuine issue of material fact or otherwise preclude 

judgment in favor of the moving party. Each additional fact must be 

set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and must refer to a 

Case 3:14-cv-03277-JD Document 80 Filed 04/20/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

specific admissible portion of the record where the fact finds 

support.

(3) Reply Statement of Facts. If the party opposing summary 

judgment sets forth additional facts, the moving party shall file a 

statement, separate from the reply brief, with correspondingly 

numbered paragraphs indicating whether the party admits or 

disputes the statement of fact set forth in that paragraph and, if 

disputed, a reference to the specific admissible portion of the record 

supporting the party’s position. Facts that are not already included 

in the motion and/or opposition are not permitted.

(4) Alternative Procedure. As an alternative to filing a statement of 

facts and controverting statement of facts, the movant and the party 

opposing the motion may jointly file a stipulation signed by the 

parties setting forth a statement of the stipulated facts and the 

following statement: “The parties agree there is no genuine issue of 

any material fact.” As to any stipulated facts, the parties so 

stipulating may state that their stipulations are entered into only for 

the purpose of the motion for summary judgment and are not 

intended to be otherwise binding.

As Keefe Kaplan Maritime, Inc. failed to file a statement of facts in compliance with the 

requirements above, the Court hereby ORDERS Keefe Kaplan Maritime, Inc. to file a statement as 

soon as possible, but no later than April 26, 2016. Any opposition and controverting statement of 

facts shall be due May 3, 2016, and any reply shall be due May 10, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2016

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-03277-JD Document 80 Filed 04/20/16 Page 2 of 2