Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02722/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02722-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DYRELL W. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA; et al., 

Defendants. /

No. C-13-2722 EMC (pr)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On November 12, 2014, mail was sent from the Court to Plaintiff at the only address he

provided to the Court and was returned undelivered on November 21, 2014, marked “return to

sender - not deliverable as addressed - unable to forward.” (Docket # 31.) Plaintiff has not provided

any address other than the address to which the undeliverable mail was sent. More than sixty days

have passed since the mail was returned to the Court undelivered. Plaintiff has failed to comply

with Local Rule 3-11(a) which requires a party proceeding pro se to “promptly file with the Court

and serve upon all opposing parties a Notice of Change of Address specifying the new address”

when his address changes. Local Rule 3-11(b) allows the Court to dismiss a complaint without

prejudice when mail directed to a pro se party is returned as not deliverable and the pro se party fails

to send a current address within sixty days of the return of the undelivered mail. This action is

DISMISSED without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to keep the Court informed of his address in

compliance with Local Rule 3-11(a). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2015

_________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-02722-EMC Document 33 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 1