Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03360/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03360-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1139P203 -1- 

STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING DISCOVERY (C04-3360 SI)

PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)

PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

A Professional Law Corporation

The Latham Square Building

1611 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 1450

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-0292

Facsimile: (510) 452-5625 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

C. FAHEEM R. HARDEMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

C. FAHEEM R. HARDEMAN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

AMTRAK/CALTRAIN RAILROAD,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. C04-3360 SI

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

ENLARGE DEADLINE FOR NONEXPERT DISCOVERY AND THE TIME

TO BRING A MOTION TO COMPEL 

Plaintiff C. FAHEEM R. HARDEMAN (“Mr. Hardeman”) and Defendant

NATIONAL PASSENGER RAILROAD CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK, by and through

their respective counsel, apply for an Order, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-11,

enlarging the time for non-expert discovery from April 21, 2006 to May 12, 2006, and the time

in which to bring a motion to compel until seven (7) court days after non-expert discovery cutoff, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 26-2. 

Good cause exists to enlarge the time for discovery to allow Defendant

AMTRAK additional time to respond to Mr. Hardeman’s discovery requests and for 

Case 3:04-cv-03360-SI Document 29-1 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:04-cv-03360-SI Document 31 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1139P203 -2- 

STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING DISCOVERY (C04-3360 SI)

Mr. Hardeman to review and evaluate Defendant’s responses and for counsel to continue their

efforts to informally resolve their discovery disputes.

Therefore, the parties respectfully request the non-expert discovery cutoff date be

enlarged for three weeks, only up to and including May 12, 2006. Until the depositions are

completed, the parties are unable to make a meaningful determination of necessary motions to

compel. Therefore, the parties respectfully request that the deadline for a motion to compel be

enlarged until and including May 23, 2006. 

DATED: February 14, 2006 PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

 /s/ 

PAMELA Y. PRICE, Attorneys for 

Plaintiff C. FAHEEM R. HARDEMAN

DATED: February 17, 2006 PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE & GIVEN LLP

 /s/ 

R.SCOTT ERLEWINE, 

Attorneys for Defendant NATIONAL RAILROAD

PASSENGER CORPORATION d/b/a AMTRAK

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that the time for non-expert discovery shall be enlarged from April 21,

2006 to May 12, 2006, and the time in which to bring a motion to compel shall be enlarged until 

May 23, 2006. 

Date: _____________ __________________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-03360-SI Document 29-1 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:04-cv-03360-SI Document 31 Filed 02/22/06 Page 2 of 2