Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-06291/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-06291-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LEONA MARINO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CACAFE, INC., ET AL., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-6291 YGR 

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY OF PUTATIVE 

CLASS/COLLECTIVE ACTION MEMBERS;

VACATING COMPLIANCE HEARING

Re: Dkt. No. 40 

The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint letter regarding their dispute over production of a 

list of putative class members. (Dkt. No. 40.) The compliance hearing set for Monday, March 

20, 2017 is VACATED. The Court hereby ORDERS defendants to produce the following 

information for all putative members of the class/collective action for the alleged period: the full 

name, current or last-known residence and business address, and telephone number; current or 

last-known employer, that employer’s address, and the current or last-known position or job title 

the person held. 

The Court’s order is subject to the following conditions: 

1. Within seven days of this Order, the parties shall enter into a stipulated protective order 

so that the information can be designated as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

2. Plaintiff’s counsel shall contact each potential putative class member in writing first, 

and advise that they have a right not to talk to counsel and that, if they elect not to talk 

to counsel, plaintiff’s counsel will terminate the contact and not contact them again. 

Plaintiff’s counsel’s initial communication with prospective class members shall make 

clear that defendant employer was compelled to disclose its employees’ information by 

Court order, and communicate the highly confidential nature of this disclosure. 

Case 4:16-cv-06291-YGR Document 44 Filed 03/16/17 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

Finally, plaintiff's counsel shall also advise the class member that they may receive a 

follow-up telephone call and/or message, not to exceed two attempts. 

3. Seven days after the mailing, plaintiff’s counsel may then contact a potential putative 

class member by telephone and reiterate that they have a right not to talk to counsel and 

that, if they elect not to talk to counsel, plaintiff’s counsel will terminate the contact 

and not contact them again. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 16, 2017 

______________________________________ 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:16-cv-06291-YGR Document 44 Filed 03/16/17 Page 2 of 2