Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01310/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01310-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULES BUCKLEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

A.E. RITOLA,

Defendant.

No. 2:11-cv-01310 KJM DAD P

ORDER

On March 25, 2014, defendant Ritola filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. 

Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 

opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 

the granting of the motion . . . .” On November 27, 2012, plaintiff was advised of the 

requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may 

be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 13.) In addition, defendant provided 

the warning required by Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63, for plaintiff's opposition to the 

motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 33-3.) 

Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for 

imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of 

/////

Case 2:11-cv-01310-KJM-DAD Document 34 Filed 05/05/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court.” In the order filed November 27, 2012, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply 

with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of 

this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion for summary judgment or 

a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this 

action pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Dated: May 5, 2014

DAD:4

buck1310.46osc

Case 2:11-cv-01310-KJM-DAD Document 34 Filed 05/05/14 Page 2 of 2