Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-md-02420/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-md-02420-49/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE:

LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION

Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR (DMR)

ORDER TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL 

INFORMATION

In the parties’ October 21, 2014 joint case management statement, the parties set forth 

competing proposals regarding modifications to discovery limitations. Plaintiffs proposed, in part, 

that the number of interrogatories authorized under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(a) should 

be modified “to allow Plaintiffs collectively to serve 60 interrogatories on Defendants.” 

Defendants indicated that they “agree that Plaintiffs (i.e., DPPs and IPPs collectively) should be 

limited to service of a total of 60 interrogatories on Defendants.” [Docket No. 518 at 16, 17.] It is 

unclear whether the parties’ agreed-upon proposal is to allow Plaintiffs collectively to serve 60 

interrogatories on each Defendant family, or if the parties propose that Plaintiffs collectively 

should be limited to 60 interrogatories on Defendants collectively. By no later than 9:00 a.m. on 

March 10, 2015, the parties shall submit a brief letter clarifying this point.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2015

________________________

DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 670 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 1