Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02000/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02000-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 441
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Voting
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Paul Sabel, a registered voter in Pinal

County, Arizona, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Pinal County, Arizona, a body politic, et

al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-2000-PHX-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Application for Order to Show Cause Why

Injunction Should Not Issue to Enforce Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42

U.S.C. § 1973c and Request to Convene Three-Judge Court (Doc. # 2). To the extent

Plaintiff requests that a three-judge court be convened, the Court finds that the Section 5

challenge is not "wholly insubstantial." See Goosby v. Osser, 409 U.S. 512, 518 (1973).

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that a three-judge court shall be convened to hear Plaintiff's

Application for Order to Show Cause Why Injunction Should Not Issue to Enforce Section

5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c.

DATED this 22nd day of October, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-02000-JAT Document 11 Filed 10/22/07 Page 1 of 1