Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00417/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00417-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Thomas Dale Grabinski, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-00417-PHX-NVW (ECV)

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge

Voss (Doc. 20) regarding Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that the Petition be denied and dismissed

with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file

objections to the R&R. (R&R at 7 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). On January 24, 2012,

Petitioner filed an objection to the R&R (Doc. 21).

The Court has considered the Petitioner’s objections and reviewed the Report and

Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the

court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and

Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the

Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the meaning

of Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)

Case 2:11-cv-00417-NVW Document 22 Filed 01/27/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

(stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings

or recommendations made by the magistrate”).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge (Doc. 20) is accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying and

dismissing Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(Doc. 1) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action.

Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order

denying Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Court FINDS: Certificate of

Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED. Petitioner has

not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

DATED this 27th day of January, 2012.

Case 2:11-cv-00417-NVW Document 22 Filed 01/27/12 Page 2 of 2