Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-00248/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-00248-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN B. KENNEY,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 13cv248-WQH-JLB

ORDER

vs.

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

Defendants.

HAYES, Judge:

“A federal court is without personal jurisdiction over a defendant unless the

defendant has been served in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.” Benny v. Pipes, 799

F.2d 489, 492 (9th Cir. 1986). Rule 4(b) requires that “the clerk must sign, seal, and

issue” the summons for service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(b); see also Ayres v. Jacobs &

Crumplar, P.A., 99 F.3d 565, 568-69 (3d Cir. 1996) (“The issuance of a summons

signed by the Clerk, with the seal of the Court, ... are essential elements of the court’s

personal jurisdiction over the defendant.... The parties cannot waive a void

summons.”); Bowen v. Post Master Gen., No. 1:14-CV-59-AWI, 2014 WL 1270546,

at *5 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2014) (“The summons served by Plaintiff was not issued by

the Court and is neither signed by the Clerk of the Court nor bears the Court’s seal as

required under Rule 4. As such, Plaintiff has not substantially complied with Rule 4

service requirements.”); McClain v. 1st Sec. Bank of Wash., No. 2:13-CV-2277-RSM,

2014 WL 556042, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 12, 2014) (“To comply with Federal Rule

- 1 - 13cv248-WQH-JLB

Case 3:13-cv-00248-WQH-AGS Document 230 Filed 07/02/14 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

of Civil Procedure 4, a plaintiff must serve all defendants with a summons that is both

signed by the clerk and bears the Court’s seal.”). 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the summonses attached to the proofs of service

filed by Plaintiff at ECF Nos. 37-41 and 205-227 do not bear the signature of the Clerk

or the Court’s seal, and accordingly those proofs of service are stricken. The proofs of

service filed by Plaintiff at ECF Nos. 42-75, 78, 80, 82 and 84 do not contain a copy of

the summonses or any indication that the summonses which were served bore the

signature of the Clerk and the Court’s seal, and accordingly those proofs of service are

stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk’s entries of default based upon the

stricken proofs of service are set aside for good cause pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 55(c). (ECF Nos. 150-163). The Motion to Set Aside Default as to U.S.

Security Associates, Inc. is denied as moot. (ECF Nos. 182, 183).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Clarification

(ECF No. 201) is granted as follows and otherwise denied. The sole operative

summons is the Summons issued on the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 25), which

is only operative as to the Defendants specifically named in the Summons issued on the

First Amended Complaint, see id. at 3. Although Plaintiff is registered for electronic

filing and has electronic access to all filings, the Clerk of the Court shall mail Plaintiff

a copy of the Summons issued on the First Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff believes

the operative summons contains an error, or requests the issuance of an amended

summons, Plaintiff may file a motion to that effect. If Plaintiff wishes to name new

defendants who were not specifically named as Defendants in the First Amended

Complaint, Plaintiff must file a motion for leave to amend the First Amended

Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, accompanied by a copy of

the proposed amended pleading, which shall be entitled “Second Amended Complaint.” 

Plaintiff is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date this Order is filed to

serve all unserved Defendants named in the First Amended Complaint. No later than

- 2 - 13cv248-WQH-JLB

Case 3:13-cv-00248-WQH-AGS Document 230 Filed 07/02/14 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

120 days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff shall file proof that service of the

operative Summons and First Amended Complaint was effectuated upon all currentlyunserved Defendants. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss

any unserved Defendant(s) without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 4(m).

DATED: July 2, 2014

WILLIAM Q. HAYES

United States District Judge

- 3 - 13cv248-WQH-JLB

Case 3:13-cv-00248-WQH-AGS Document 230 Filed 07/02/14 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 3