Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03257/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03257-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

Baker & McKenzie LLP 

12544 High Bluff Drive, 

Third Floor 

San Diego, CA 92130 

+1 858 523 6200 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1 

Case No C 07-03257 SI 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 

SDODMS1/683751.1 

Howard N. Wisnia, State Bar No. 184626 

Baker & McKenzie LLP 

12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor 

San Diego, CA 92130-3051 

Telephone: +1 858 523 6200 

Facsimile: +1 858 259 8290 

Email: howard.n.wisnia@bakernet.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and WELLS 

FARGO BANK, N.A. 

Additional counsel listed on signature page 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PRIVASYS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE 

ASSOCIATION, VISA U.S.A., JPMORGAN 

CHASE & CO., CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE 

BANK, USA, N.A., WELLS FARGO & 

COMPANY and WELLS FARGO BANK, 

N.A., 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 07-03257 SI 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO RESPOND TO AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Privasys, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) served its Amended Complaint and 

Demand for Jury Trial upon Defendants Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 

(collectively the “Wells Fargo Defendants”); and 

WHEREAS, the Wells Fargo Defendants’ answer or other response to the Amended 

Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial is presently due on or before December 10, 2007; and 

WHEREAS, no trial date has yet been set in this action and no previous extension has been 

sought or granted for the Wells Fargo Defendants’ to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended 

Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial; and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and the Wells Fargo Defendants, through their respective counsel of 

Case 3:07-cv-03257-SI Document 67 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:07-cv-03257-SI Document 70 Filed 12/10/07 Page 1 of 2
Baker & McKenzie LLP 

San Diego 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2 

Case No C 07-03257 SI 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 

SDODMS1/683751.1 

record, have agreed to extend the time by which the Wells Fargo Defendants must answer or 

otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial; and 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective 

attorneys of record that the Wells Fargo Defendants will have to and including January 10, 2008, to 

serve and file an answer or other response to the Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their 

respective attorneys of record that by entering into this stipulation, the Wells Fargo Defendants do 

not waive any defenses to the Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. 

Dated: December 7, 2007 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP 

By: /s/Howard N. Wisnia 

Howard N. Wisnia 

Attorneys for Defendants 

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 

Dated: December 7, 2007 HOSIE MCARTHUR LLP 

By: /s/George F. Bishop 

George F. Bishop 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PRIVASYS, INC. 

I hereby attest that pursuant to General Order 45.X.B., that concurrence in the electronic filing of 

this document was obtained from the other signatory. 

Dated: December 7, 2007 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP 

By: /s/Howard N. Wisnia 

Howard N. Wisnia 

Case 3:07-cv-03257-SI Document 67 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 2 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Susan Illston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Susan Illston

Case 3:07-cv-03257-SI Document 70 Filed 12/10/07 Page 2 of 2