Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03264/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03264-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION.

Case No. 14-cv-03264-JD 

ORDER SETTING AGENDA FOR 

MOTIONS HEARING AND STATUS 

CONFERENCE ON 9/30/15

The Court sets the following agenda for the motions hearing and status conference to be 

held on September 30, 2015, at 10 a.m.:

I. HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINTS

A. The Court intends to hear argument only on the issue of whether the indirect 

purchaser plaintiffs’ non-California claims should be dismissed because of a lack of 

Article III standing or because there are not enough alleged contacts with the thirtyone states. See Dkt. No. 793 at 1-7. 

B. The other pending motions to dismiss the DPPs and Flextronics’ and the IPPs’ 

complaints (Dkt. Nos. 787, 788, 792, 790 and the remainder of 793) will be decided 

on the papers pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b).

II. HEARING ON FLEXTRONICS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ACCESS AND MODIFY 

ORDER

A. The Court will hear argument on Flextronics’ motion. Dkt. No. 869.

III. DISCUSSION RE PENDING MOTIONS TO RELATE

A. The Court intends to solicit views on the pending motions to relate, Dkt. Nos. 859, 

871, and discuss with the parties (and the government) more generally whether the 

newly-filed resisters cases should be related to this action.

//

//

//

//

Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 892 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IV. STATUS CONFERENCE

A. The Court will then take up and resolve the requests and (ripe) disputes identified 

by the parties’ joint status conference statement. Dkt. No. 891.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 25, 2015

________________________

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 892 Filed 09/25/15 Page 2 of 2