Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_00-cv-05381/USCOURTS-caed-1_00-cv-05381-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENCE GIBSON,

Plaintiff, CV F 00 5381 AWI WMW P

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

 RE MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 

 (DOC 160 )

GEORGE GALAZA, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Pending before the court is

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. Plaintiff is an inmate at High Desert prison, and seeks a

restraining order against the enforcement of certain policies at that prison. 

This action proceeds against Defendant Walker for a single incident of excessive

force while Plaintiff was housed at CSP Corcoran in 2000. There are no defendants in this

action employed at High Desert State Prison. The court must have personal jurisdiction over the

parties to be enjoined; it may not enjoin defendants not yet served or before the court. Zepeda v.

United States I.N.S., 753 F.2d 719, 727 (9 Cir. 1983). th

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s motion for

injunctive relief be denied.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Case 1:00-cv-05381-GSA Document 194 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9 Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the th

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 13, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:00-cv-05381-GSA Document 194 Filed 02/13/07 Page 2 of 2