Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05774/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05774-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

ADR STIPULATION 1 

C09 05774 RS

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR 

and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil Local 

Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

 Court Processes: 

 [ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR Local Rule 4) 

CYNTHIA DIAZ 

 Plaintiff, 

V. 

MING & KEITH, INC. DBA KOONG’S 

RESTAURANT AND PEARL YU DBA 

KOONG’S RESTAURANT 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C09 05774 RS

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

SEELECTING ADR PROCESS 

MING JI, ESQ (CSB #256696)

VIGOR LAW GROUP 

777 North First Street, Suite 415 

San Jose, CA 95112 

Tel.: (408) 283-9299 

Fax: (408) 283-9399 

Email: mji@vigorlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants: 

Ming & Keith, Inc. and Pearl Yu 

*E-FILED 04-22-2010* XXXXXXXX xxx HRL

Case 5:09-cv-05774-HRL Document 23 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 3
ADR STIPULATION 2 

C09 05774 RS

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

 [ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR Local Rule 5) 

 [x] Mediation (ADR Local Rule 6) 

 Private Process: 

 [ ] Private ADR _____________________________________ 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 [x] the presumptive deadline 

 [ ] other requested deadline _______________________ 

Dated: March 17, 2010 /s/Ming Ji 

 MING JI, Esq. 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Ming & Keith, Inc. and Pearl Yu 

Dated: March 17, 2010 /s/James Dal Bon 

 James Dal Bon, Esq. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 Cynthia Diaz 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby 

referred to: 

 [ ] Non-binding Arbitration 

 [ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 

 [x] Mediation 

 [ ] Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session 

 [x] 90 days from the date of this order 

xxxxxxxxxxxx

Case 5:09-cv-05774-HRL Document 23 Filed 04/22/10 Page 2 of 3
ADR STIPULATION 3 

C09 05774 RS

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

 [ ] other 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________ ______________________________ 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

April 22, 2010 Howard R. Lloyd

Case 5:09-cv-05774-HRL Document 23 Filed 04/22/10 Page 3 of 3