Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL MANRIQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

HUCHINS, et al.,

Defendants.

/

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00456-LJO-BAM PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION AND VACATING

PORTION OFORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

O P POSITI O N T O D E FE N D AN T S ’

OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE

(ECF Nos. 218, 244, 245)

Plaintiff Daniel Manriquez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed a

motion for summary judgment, statement of undisputed facts, declaration in support of his motion,

and request for judicial notice. (ECF Nos. 191-194.) On June 14, 2012, Defendants filed an

opposition to the motion for summary judgment, declaration of Defendant Hacker, statement of

disputed facts, response to Plaintiff’s statement of undisputed facts, and objections to Plaintiff’s

motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 202-206.) On June 27, 2012, Defendants filed an

amended oppositionto the motionfor summaryjudgment, amended declarationofDefendant Hacker,

amended statement of disputed facts, and amended response to Plaintiff’s statement of undisputed

facts to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 209-212.) On July 9, 2012, Plaintiff

filed evidentiary objectionsto Defendants’ evidence submitted in support of the motion for summary

judgment, a declaration in support of Plaintiff’s evidentiary objections, and an opposition to

Defendant’s objections to the evidence submitted in support of the motion for summary judgment.

(ECF Nos. 216-218.) 

1

Case 1:09-cv-00456-BAM Document 246 Filed 11/19/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

After receiving an extension of time, on July 31, 2012, Plaintiff filed a reply to opposition to

the motion for summary judgment and objections to Defendants amended evidence in support of

Defendants’ opposition. (ECF Nos. 227, 228.) On November 11, 2012, and order issued striking

Defendants’ opposition to the motion for summary judgment, declaration of Defendant Hacker,

statement of disputed facts, and response, and Plaintiff’s evidentiary objections to Defendant’s

evidence, declaration in support, and opposition to Defendants’ objections. (ECF No. 244.) On

November 15, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 245.)

Plaintiffseeks reconsideration of the order striking his opposition to Defendants evidentiary

objections in support of Plaintiff’s motion to compel. Upon review of the record this document was

stricken in error. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the portion of the order November

2, 2012, striking Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ evidentiary objections is VACATED, and

Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ objections to evidence is restored to the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe

cm411 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-00456-BAM Document 246 Filed 11/19/12 Page 2 of 2