Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05626/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05626-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal 

P:\pro-se\sj.jf\hc.06\White626dis 1

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY L. WHITE, 

Petitioner,

 vs.

MICHAEL HENNESSEY, Sheriff, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-5626 JF (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and two motions to proceed in forma pauperis. On

March 1, 2007, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause why the petition should not be

dismissed without prejudice because the instant petition challenges his pending state

criminal proceeding and it appears that he has not exhausted his state court remedies prior

to filing the instant petition. The Court directed Petitioner to file a response within thirty

days addressing: (1) whether his state criminal proceeding, at issue in the instant case, is

currently pending; (2) whether he has an appeal, habeas petition or other post-conviction

proceeding now pending before the state court; and (3) whether he has presented the

claims in the instant petition to the California Supreme Court. The Court notified

**Original filed 5/1/07**

Case 5:06-cv-05626-JF Document 6 Filed 05/01/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal 

P:\pro-se\sj.jf\hc.06\White626dis 2

Petitioner that the failure to file a timely response would result in the Court dismissing the

instant petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedies. As of the

date of this order, Petitioner has not responded to the Court’s order, or communicated

with the Court. Accordingly, the instant petition is DISMISSED without prejudice for

failure to exhaust state remedies. The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions and

close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _______________ 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

4/30/07

Case 5:06-cv-05626-JF Document 6 Filed 05/01/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal 

P:\pro-se\sj.jf\hc.06\White626dis 3

A copy of this ruling was mailed to the following:

Larry L. White 

# 2214748

P.O. Box 67

San Bruno, CA 94066

Case 5:06-cv-05626-JF Document 6 Filed 05/01/07 Page 3 of 3