Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02181/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02181-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND 

THE COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LES JANKEY

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LES JANKEY, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES:HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ERNESTO’S PIZZA RESTAURANT;

ALBERT WONG and THERESA WONG

as trustees of THE WONG FAMILY

TRUST; and JAMES P. CHARAS, an

individual dba ERNESTO’S PIZZA

RESTAURANT,

Defendants. ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-2181 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE

TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AND

CONTINUING THE CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

IT IS STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs Les Jankey and Disability Rights

Enforcement, Education Services, and defendant James P. Charas, dba Ernesto’s Pizza, that

plaintiffs may file the Second Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. Since

service of the first amended complaint herein, plaintiffs have learned that Anastacios

Mermegas is one of the operators of Ernesto’s Pizza Restaurant, the public accommodation

which is the subject of this litigation. Accordingly, Anastacios Mermegas is a proper

defendant to this action, and plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint adds Anastacios

Mermegas as a defendant. It has also been brought to plaintiffs attention that the address of

Case 3:06-cv-02181-CRB Document 8 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND 

THE COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 2

the subject public accommodation is misstated in the complaint. Plaintiffs’ Second Amended

Complaint corrects this clerical error with regard to the address of Ernesto’s Pizza Restaurant.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that, based on the representation of plaintiffs’ counsel

that service of the summons and complaint has not been effectuated on defendants Albert

Wong and Theresa Wong despite extensive and diligent effort, and in anticipation of plaintiffs’

Second Amended Complaint naming a new party to this action, that the case management

conference currently set for June 30, 2006, and all associated filing deadlines be continued for

a period of sixty (60) days.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: June 22, 2006 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ 

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LES JANKEY and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION

SERVICES

Dated: June 22, 2006 MENEKSHE LAW FIRM

By: /s/ 

Ayhan M. Menekshe

Attorneys for Defendants JAMES P. CHARAS and

ANASTACIOS MERMEGAS

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs may file the Second Amended Complaint

attached hereto as Exhibit A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case management

conference currently set for June 30, 2006, is continued to ______________, 2006, at 8:30

///

///

///

///

September 01

Case 3:06-cv-02181-CRB Document 8 Filed 06/28/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND 

THE COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 3

a.m. The parties shall comply with their meet and confer obligations no later than 21 days

prior to the conference, and shall submit a Joint Case Management Statement no later than 7

days before the conference.

Dated: , 2006

 

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

June 27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-02181-CRB Document 8 Filed 06/28/06 Page 3 of 3