Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06008/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06008-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT LARRY EDER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

L. RYAN BRODDRICK, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 06-06008 JSW

ORDER RE FURTHER BRIEFING

In its reply brief, Plaintiffs cite to Healy v. Beer Inst., 491 U.S. 324, 336 (1989) for the

proposition that the Dormant Commerce clause forbids a state from regulating commerce that

takes place wholly outside of the State’s borders. Defendants are directed to file a supplemental

reply brief addressing Healy by no later than 10:00 a.m. on December 5, 2006. The

supplemental reply brief is limited to five pages and shall only present argument addressing

Healy. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 30, 2006 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-06008-JSW Document 44 Filed 11/30/06 Page 1 of 1