Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04436/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04436-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C-09-04436 CW CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2(a) STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Richard L. Seabolt, Esq. (SBN 67469) 

rlseabolt@duanemorris.com 

DUANE MORRIS LLP

Spear Tower 

One Market Plaza, Suite 2200 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1127 

Telephone: 415.957.3000 

Facsimile: 415.957.3001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC 

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) 

griley@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-3823 

Telephone: 415.984.8700 

Facsimile: 415.984.8701 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff 

APPLE INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC., a 

Texas Limited Liability Company, 

Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim-Defendant, 

v. 

APPLE INC., a California Corporation, 

Defendant and 

Counterclaim-Plaintiff. 

CASE NO. CV 09-4436-CW 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2(a) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken 

Case 4:09-cv-04436-CW Document 69 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C-09-04436 CW - 1 - CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2(a) STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant 

Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC (“Affinity”) and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Apple Inc. 

(“Apple”) as follows: 

WHEREAS, Affinity served Patent Local Rule 3-1 Infringement Contentions on May 10, 

2010, pursuant to the deadlines dictated by the Joint Rule 26(f) report (Docket No. 54) and the 

Minute Order and Case Management Order (Docket No. 64). 

WHEREAS, Affinity indicated to Apple that it would seek leave from the Court (pursuant 

to Patent Local Rule 3-6) to serve amended Patent Local Rule 3-1 Infringement Contentions, 

asserting two additional claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,187,947, and Apple agreed not to oppose 

Affinity’s efforts to amend its Infringement Contentions; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Joint Rule 26(f) report (Docket No. 54) and the Minute Order 

and Case Management Order (Docket No. 64), Apple is required to serve by June 24, 2010, its 

Patent Local Rule 3-3 Invalidity Contentions and its Patent Local Rule 3-4 Document Production 

Accompanying the Invalidity Contentions; 

WHEREAS, Apple indicated to Affinity that although Apple is working diligently to meet 

the current deadlines, Apple needs additional time to complete its Patent Local Rule 3-3 

Invalidity Contentions and its Patent Local Rule 3-4 Document Production Accompanying the 

Invalidity Contentions; 

WHEREAS, Affinity and Apple wish to modify the current schedule to allow Apple 

additional time to complete its Patent Local Rule 3-3 Invalidity Contentions and its Patent Local 

Rule 3-4 Document Production Accompanying the Invalidity Contentions; 

WHEREAS, the parties have not previously sought any time modifications related to the 

foregoing contentions; 

WHEREAS, the parties’ proposed modification will not impact the trial date or any other 

dates in this action; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE 

PARTIES HERETO, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL AND SUBJECT TO THE 

APPROVAL OF THE COURT, AS FOLLOWS: 

Case 4:09-cv-04436-CW Document 69 Filed 06/22/10 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C-09-04436 CW - 2 - CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2(a) STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Apple shall serve its Patent Local Rule 3-3 Invalidity Contentions and its Patent Local 

Rule 3-4 Document Production Accompanying the Invalidity Contentions on or before July 19, 

2010; and 

Affinity shall be permitted to amend its Patent Local Rule 3-1 Infringement Contentions 

to add dependent claims 11 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 7,187,947. 

Dated: June 21, 2010 GEORGE A. RILEY 

RYAN K. YAGURA 

DARIN J. GLASSER 

NICHOLAS J. WHILT 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Darin J. Glasser 

 Darin J. Glasser 

Attorneys for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff APPLE INC. 

Dated: June 21, 2010 RICHARD L. SEABOLT 

L. NORWOOD JAMESON 

MATTHEW C. GAUDET 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

By: /s/ Matthew C. Gaudet 

 Matthew C. Gaudet 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, 

LLC 

Case 4:09-cv-04436-CW Document 69 Filed 06/22/10 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C-09-04436 CW - 3 - CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2(a) STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from Richard L. Seabolt. 

Dated: June 21, 2010 GEORGE A. RILEY 

RYAN K. YAGURA 

DARIN J. GLASSER 

NICHOLAS J. WHILT 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Darin J. Glasser 

 Darin J. Glasser 

Attorneys for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff APPLE INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated:______________ _______________________________________

 Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Judge 

6/22/2010

Case 4:09-cv-04436-CW Document 69 Filed 06/22/10 Page 4 of 4