Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-01846/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-01846-446/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK 

TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

APPLE INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK 

TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM

The Court’s tentative verdict form is attached as Exhibit A. The parties shall file any 

comments to this verdict from by Friday, March 11, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 4, 2016

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3446 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 5
2

Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK 

TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

EXHIBIT A

Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3446 Filed 03/04/16 Page 2 of 5
3

Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK 

TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

APPLE INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK 

VERDICT FORM

We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them 

under the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case.

FINDINGS ON APPLE’S DAMAGES CLAIMS

1. What is the total dollar amount that Apple is entitled to receive in damages from 

Samsung?

$ . 

2. For the total dollar amount in your answer to Question 1, please provide the dollar 

breakdown by patent and by product. (Do not provide an answer for any cell that is blacked 

out.)

Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3446 Filed 03/04/16 Page 3 of 5
4

Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK 

TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Total

08/04/2010

to

06/30/2012

1 All 5 products infringe the D’677 Patent. All 5 products infringe the D’305 Patent. The Galaxy S4G and Vibrant infringe the D’087 Patent. The Fascinate, Galaxy S Showcase, and Mesmerize do not infringe the D’087 Patent and are not eligible for an award based on that patent.2 The D’677 is the only design patent eligible for damages from April 15, 2011 to June 15, 2011.3 All three Apple design patents are eligible for damages from June 16, 2011 to June 30, 2012. In this case, Apple seeks Samsung’s profits from sales of products that infringe Apple’s design patents. You may award to Apple Samsung’s total profit attributable to the infringing products. However, Apple may only recover that form of damages once per unit, no matter how many design patents were infringed by that unit.4 “No Double Recovery” indicates that units that infringed this patent in this time period also infringed one or more design patents and thus no further damages may be awarded.

’163

06/16/2011

to

06/30/2012

No Double 

Recovery

4

No Double 

Recovery

No Double 

Recovery

No Double 

Recovery

D’305 or D’087 

or D’677

1

06/16/2011

to

06/30/2012

3

D’677 Alone

04/15/2011

to

06/15/2011

2

’915

04/15/2011

to

05/29/2011

’381

08/04/2010 

to

04/14/2011

Patent

Damages 

Period:

Fascinate 

(JX1013)

Galaxy S4G 

(JX1019)

Galaxy S 

Showcase 

(JX1017)

Mesmerize 

(JX1015)

Vibrant 

(JX1010)

Total

Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3446 Filed 03/04/16 Page 4 of 5
5

Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK 

TENTATIVE VERDICT FORM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

___________________________________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3446 Filed 03/04/16 Page 5 of 5