Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06409/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06409-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONROE WALTER BURNS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

A.P. KANE, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:04-cv-06409-LJO-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 47)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On September 20, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

a Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DENIED, and the Clerk of Court be directed to enter judgment in

favor of Respondent. These Findings and Recommendation were served

on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that

order. On October 23, 2007, Petitioner filed objections to the

Findings and Recommendation.

//

/

Case 1:04-cv-06409-LJO -DLB Document 49 Filed 11/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendation are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed September 20,

2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 27, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06409-LJO -DLB Document 49 Filed 11/28/07 Page 2 of 2