Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00644/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00644-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUY T. STRINGHAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. BICK, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 2:05-cv-0644 FCD GGH P

ORDER

Defendants filed a request for an extension of time to file a reply to plaintiff’s

opposition to defendants’ summary judgment motion. Because it appeared that no proposed

order in wordperfect format was processed to chambers via email, this court issued an order

indicating that defendants had failed to fully comply with Local Rule 5-137(b). However, it

appears that defendants had properly emailed the original proposed order and due to an internal

error by court staff, it was not processed properly. 

Good cause having been shown, Defendants are granted an additional fifteen days, to

and including November 21, 2007, to file their Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’

Motion for Summary Judgment.

Dated: 11/5/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

U.S. Magistrate Judge

stri0644.po2

Case 2:05-cv-00644-FCD-GGH Document 67 Filed 11/05/07 Page 1 of 1