Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01179/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01179-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jerry Lee Cole,

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al. 

 Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-1179-PHX-MHM

ORDER

Petitioner filed his Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 on September 15, 2008, claiming his sentence imposed was in violation of his

constitutional rights. On December 9, 2008, Respondents filed their response to Petitioner’s

Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Petitioner filed a reply on January 26,

2009. On March 19, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and Recommendation

recommending that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. 

In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Failure to timely file objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge

/ / / 

Case 2:08-cv-01179-MHM Document 20 Filed 05/22/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

may be considered a waiver of a party’s right to de novo consideration of the issues. See

United States v. Reyna-Tapia 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

After a complete and independent review of the issues presented, the Court finds itself

in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court [doc. 19]

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

is denied and dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2009.

Case 2:08-cv-01179-MHM Document 20 Filed 05/22/09 Page 2 of 2