Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02057/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02057-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 06-2057 JF (RS)

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

(JFLC1)

**E-Filed 8/11/06**

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

KINDERSTART.COM LLC, a California limited

liability company, on behalf of itself and all others

similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation,

 Defendant.

Case Number C 06-2057 JF (RS)

ADMINISTRATIVE AND

CLARIFICATION ORDER

[re: docket no. 43]

Plaintiff Kinderstart.com LLC (“Kinderstart”) requests an extension of certain dates in

the instant action and a clarification of this Court’s Order dated July 13, 2006. On June 30, 2006,

this Court set a tentative date of September 29, 2006 for argument on the anticipated motion of

Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) to dismiss Kinderstart’s anticipated Second Amended

Complaint (“SAC”). The Court also set a case management conference for that date. Kinderstart

requests that the motion hearing date and the case management conference be continued until on

or after December 1, 2006. Defendant Google opposes this request and asks that the hearing be

continued only until October 6, 2006 and that the case management conference be scheduled

during the hearing.

Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF Document 46 Filed 08/11/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 06-2057 JF (RS)

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

(JFLC1)

Having considered both parties’ requests, the Court hereby sets the following schedule:

September 1, 2006 Deadline for filing SAC

September 22, 2006 Deadline for filing motion(s) responsive to the SAC

October 13, 2006 Deadline for filing opposition

October 20, 2006 Deadline for filing reply

October 27, 2006 Oral argument on motion(s) and case management

conference

Having granted in part Kinderstart’s request for an extension of time for filing its SAC, thus

allowing Kinderstart additional time to frame its claims, the Court advises Kinderstart that it may

be less inclined to grant further leave to amend its pleadings should Google’s motion to dismiss

be meritorious.

Additionally, Kinderstart requests clarification as to whether the July 13, 2006 Order

dismissed its first claim with or without leave to amend. The Court hereby clarifies that the

Order dismissed all of Kinderstart’s claims with leave to amend.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 11, 2006

 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF Document 46 Filed 08/11/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case No. C 06-2057 JF (RS)

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

(JFLC1)

This Order has been served upon the following persons:

Colleen Bal cbal@wsgr.com, eminjarez@wsgr.com

David H. Kramer dkramer@wsgr.com, dgrubbs@wsgr.com

Bart Edward Volkmer, Esq bvolkmer@wsgr.com

Gregory John Yu glgroup@inreach.com, gjy@abcye.com 

Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF Document 46 Filed 08/11/06 Page 3 of 3