Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-01543/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-01543-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO FILE REPLY IN 

SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF JENNIFER L. MURRAY 

Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)

717576.01 

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

SUSAN J. HARRIMAN - #111703 

sharriman@kvn.com 

ERIC H. MACMICHAEL - # 231697 

emacmichael@kvn.com 

R. ADAM LAURIDSEN - #243780 

alauridsen@kvn.com 

TIA A. SHERRINGHAM - #258507 

tsherringham@kvn.com 

633 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois citizen,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a California 

corporation, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO 

FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION 

TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF 

JENNIFER L. MURRAY 

Date: January 25, 2013 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Ctrm: 6, 17th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

Complaint Filed: March 30, 2011 

Trial Date: April 1, 2013 

Case 3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document 259 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 3 Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document248 Filed12/21/12 Page1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO FILE REPLY IN 

SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF JENNIFER L. MURRAY 

Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)

717576.01 

WHEREAS, on December 5, 2012, Defendant filed a Motion to Strike the Declaration of 

Jennifer L. Murray in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Second Motion for 

Summary Judgment; 

WHEREAS, on December 19, 2012, Plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Motion; 

WHEREAS, Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion is due on December 26, 2012; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a seven-day extension for Defendant to file its 

Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike the Declaration of Jennifer L. Murray extending the due 

date to January 2, 2013. The extension will not change the January 25, 2013 hearing date for the 

motion; 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff 

and Defendant, that: 

• Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike the Declaration of Jennifer L. 

Murray in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Second Motion for 

Summary Judgment is due January 2, 2013; and, 

• The hearing will remain as scheduled. 

The authority for and concurrence in the filing of this stipulated request has been obtained 

from each of the signatories, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3). 

Dated: December 21, 2012 

By:

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO 

LLP 

/s/ Leonard W. Aragon 

 LEONARD W. ARAGON

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ROBIN ANTONICK

Dated: December 21, 2012 

By:

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

/s/ Susan J. Harriman 

 SUSAN J. HARRIMAN 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. 

 

Case 3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document 259 Filed 01/04/13 Page 2 of 3 Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document248 Filed12/21/12 Page2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO FILE REPLY IN 

SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF JENNIFER L. MURRAY 

Case No. 3:11-CV-01543-CRB (EDL)

717576.01 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: , 2012 ________________________________________ HON. CHARLES R. BREYER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF 

CALIFORNIA 

Case3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document248 Filed12/21/12 Page3 of 3

January 3, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:11-cv-01543-CRB Document 259 Filed 01/04/13 Page 3 of 3