Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01642/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01642-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., a )

Delaware corporation; INTERSCOPE )

RECORDS, a California general )

partnership; SONY BMG MUSIC )

ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general )

partnership; and ATLANTIC )

RECORDING CORPORATION, a Delaware )

corporation, )

) 2:06-cv-1642-GEB-EFB

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

LENORA CHRISTINE BABB, ) CONFERENCE

)

Defendant. )

)

On September 28, 2006, Plaintiffs filed an “Ex Parte

Application to Continue Scheduling Conference” (“Application”) in

which they request the status conference scheduled in this action be

continued “so that Plaintiffs may continue to attempt to serve

[D]efendant.” (Application at 2.) Accordingly, the status conference

is rescheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on December 18, 2006. In

accordance with the Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling)

Conference filed July 26, 2006, a joint status report shall be filed

Case 2:06-cv-01642-GEB-EFB Document 9 Filed 10/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The failure of one or more of the parties to 1

participate in the preparation of the Joint Status Report does

not excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file

a status report in accordance with this Order. In the event a

party fails to participate as ordered, the party timely

submitting the status report shall include a declaration

explaining why it was unable to obtain the cooperation of the

other party or parties.

2

no later than December 4, 2006.1

If Defendant is not served by November 22, 2006, Defendant

could be dismissed from this action under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 4(m). If Plaintiff does not perfect service by this date,

Plaintiff shall show cause no later than 4:00 p.m. on November 29,

2006, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to serve

Defendant within Rule 4(m)’s 120-day time period. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 3, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01642-GEB-EFB Document 9 Filed 10/04/06 Page 2 of 2