Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05018/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05018-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER

CASE NO. CV 05-5018 RMW

PAGE 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Garden City Boxing Club, Inc.

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

Pedro Muniz Orozco, et al.

 Defendant.

CASE NO. C 05-5018 RMW

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE; AND ORDER

Plaintiff Garden City Boxing Club, Inc., hereby applies ex parte for an order continuing the

initial Case Management Conference in this action, presently set for Friday, May 5, 2006 at 10:30 a.m.

to a new date approximately forty-five (45) to sixty (60) days forward. This request will be, and is, made

pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11, and is necessitated by the fact that Plaintiff is currently attempting to

perfect service of process of the suit papers as to the defendant named to this action. 

As a result, Plaintiff’s counsel has not conferred with the defendant concerning the claims,

discovery, settlement, ADR or any of the other pertinent issues involving the case itself or the

preparation of a Case Management Conference Statement. 

///

///

Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C.

1114 Fremont Avenue

South Pasadena, CA 91030

Tel: 626-799-9797

Fax: 626-799-9795

TPRLA@att.net

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Garden City Boxing Club, Inc.

Case 5:05-cv-05018-RMW Document 6 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 4
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER 

CASE NO. CV 05-5018 RMW

PAGE 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Wherefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court continue the Case

Management Conference presently scheduled for Friday, May 5, 2006 to a new date approximately

forty-five (45) to sixty (60) days forward in order that a responsive pleading may be filed by the

defendant and Plaintiff’s counsel may thereafter confer with the defendant and/or defendant’s counsel

and thereafter prepare and file a joint Case Management Conference Statement for the Court’s review.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 28, 2006 /s/ Thomas P. Riley 

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C.

By: Thomas P. Riley

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Garden City Boxing Club, Inc.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 5:05-cv-05018-RMW Document 6 Filed 05/03/06 Page 2 of 4
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER 

CASE NO. CV 05-5018 RMW

PAGE 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

 It is hereby ordered that the Case Management Conference in civil action number C 05-5018

RMW styled Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. Pedro Muniz Orozco, et al., is hereby continued from

10:30 am, Friday, May 5, 2006,

to_________________________________________________________.

 The Parties shall file a joint Case Management Statement in advance of the Case Management

Conference pursuant to the Local Rules and the Standing Order of this Court. 

Plaintiff shall also serve a copy of this Order on the Defendant and thereafter file a Certification

of Service of this Order with the Clerk of the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED:

 Dated: 

THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE 

United States District Court

Northern District of California

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 5:05-cv-05018-RMW Document 6 Filed 05/03/06 Page 3 of 4
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER 

CASE NO. CV 05-5018 RMW

PAGE 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE (SERVICE BY MAIL)

I declare that:

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, California. I am over the age of eighteen years

and not a party to the within cause; my business address is 1114 Fremont Avenue, South Pasadena,

California. I am readily familiar with this law firm's practice for collection and processing of

correspondence/documents for mail in the ordinary course of business.

On April 28, 2006, I served:

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER (Proposed)

On all parties in said cause by enclosing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope with postage

prepaid and following ordinary business practices, said envelope was duly mailed and addressed to:

Pedro Muniz Orozco (Defendant)

222 Willow Street, Apt. B

San Jose, CA 95110

I declare under the penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the United States that the

foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on April 28, 2006, at South

Pasadena, California.

Dated: April 28, 2006 /s/ Inesa Mamidjanyan 

 INESA MAMIDJANYAN 

Case 5:05-cv-05018-RMW Document 6 Filed 05/03/06 Page 4 of 4