Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03234/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03234-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 29:791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK DICKASON,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

JOHN E. POTTER,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 05-3234 VRW (MEJ)

ORDER RE: JOINT LETTER

The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter, filed May 17, 2006 (Doc. #27), regarding

outstanding discovery disputes. Although the letter briefly addresses certain disputes that have not

been resolved, at the conclusion of the letter, the parties establish a briefing schedule for a motion to

compel. As the undersigned does not consider motions to compel and requires the filing of joint

letters, it is unclear whether the parties are requesting a ruling based on the May 17 letter or whether

they are providing a status report. Accordingly, if the parties are requesting a ruling on pending

disputes, they shall file a revised joint letter (a separate letter for each dispute) and address all legal

arguments, including citations to legal authority for their positions, in the revised letter. Neither

party shall file a motion to compel pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7; instead, the parties shall comply

with the undersigned's discovery standing order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

May 17, 2006

Case 3:05-cv-03234-VRW Document 28 Filed 05/17/06 Page 1 of 1