Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02326/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02326-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424

Federal Defender

DAVID M. PORTER, Bar #127024

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 498-5700

Attorney for Petitioner

MICHAEL BRODHEIM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. VEAL, Acting Warden, and 

A. SCHWARTZNEGGER, Governor

 of the State of California,

Defendants.

_______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. Civ. S 06-2326 LKK GGH

STIPULATED REQUEST; ORDER

Judge: Honorable Gregory G.

Hollows

COMES NOW Petitioner, MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM, by and through his

counsel, Assistant Federal Defender David M. Porter, and Respondents M.

VEAL, et al., by and through their counsel, Deputy Attorney General

Pamela Hooley, to request that the Court set a status conference for

March 1, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. for the reasons set forth below.

On December 1, 2006, the court ordered that the above-entitled

matter was related within the meaning of the local rules to Michael

Brodheim v. Louie DiNinni, Civ. S 05-01512 LKK GGH, and it reassigned

this matter to Senior District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton and Magistrate

Judge Gregory G. Hollows. In doing so, the court also vacated the

dates in the reassigned (above-entitled) matter. The only date in the

Case 2:06-cv-02326-LKK-GGH Document 24 Filed 12/18/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

reassigned matter was a status conference set for March 1, 2007. The

parties agree Mr. Brodheim’s counsel needs time to read the extensive

exhibits attached to the amended petition, consult with Mr. Brodheim,

and determine whether there are any claims that need to be added by way

of a second amended petition, and therefore that a status conference on

March 1, 2007 is appropriate. Accordingly, the parties respectfully

request that the court issue the order lodged herewith. 

Dated: December 8, 2006

Respectfully submitted,

BILL LOCKYER DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Attorney General Federal Defender

 /s/ Pamela Hooley /s/ David M. Porter 

PAMELA HOOLEY DAVID M. PORTER

Deputy Attorney General Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Respondents Attorney for Petitioner

M. VEAL, et al. MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulated request of the parties, and good cause

appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED:

1. A status conference is set for March 1, 2007, at 10:00 a.m.

in Courtroom 24;

2. No later than fourteen days prior to the status conference, 

the parties shall file a joint scheduling statement which addresses the

timing and order of the following matters:

a. The number of days petitioner’s counsel estimates it

will take to file either:

1. A statement indicating petitioner will stand on the

existing petition, and supplemental memorandum of

Case 2:06-cv-02326-LKK-GGH Document 24 Filed 12/18/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 125 S. Ct. 1528 (2005). 1

3

points and authorities, if any;

2. An amended petition which will proceed on

exhausted claims only; or

3. An amended petition which identifies both exhausted

and unexhausted claims, demonstrates good cause for

having failed to exhaust state court remedies as to

any claims, and any intention to pursue 1

unexhausted claims, after which the court may

recommend that the proceedings be held in abeyance

while petitioner exhausts any new claims in state

court.

b. Discovery and investigations;

c. Anticipated motions;

d. The need for and timing of an evidentiary hearing;

e. Enumeration and resolution of unexhausted claims; and

f. Possible future amendments to the pleadings.

Counsel are reminded of the importance of timely filing a joint

scheduling statement. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.

DATED: 12/18/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

______________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

brod2326.po

Case 2:06-cv-02326-LKK-GGH Document 24 Filed 12/18/06 Page 3 of 3