Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-02323/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-02323-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sheila Latham, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

West Corporation, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-2323-PHX-DGC

ORDER

Sheila Latham commenced this employment discrimination action by filing a pro se

complaint against her former employer, West Corporation (a/k/a West Direct II, Inc.).

Dkt. #1. Plaintiff has filed a request for a jury trial (Dkt. #31), which the Court will construe

as a demand for a jury trial under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The question of

whether Plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial, and on what issues, will be addressed during

pretrial proceedings if the case is not otherwise resolved through settlement or the resolution

of dispositive motions. The Court will deny Plaintiff’s request to the extent it may be

construed as motion for a jury trial.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s request for a jury trial (Dkt. #31) is construed as a demand for a jury

trial under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Case 2:08-cv-02323-DGC Document 34 Filed 11/24/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

2. Plaintiff’s request is denied to the extent it may be construed as a motion.

DATED this 24th day of November, 2009.

Case 2:08-cv-02323-DGC Document 34 Filed 11/24/09 Page 2 of 2