Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-15-01605/USCOURTS-ca8-15-01605-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-1605

___________________________

Lori Irish

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

United States Department of Justice; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Officer Pena;

Lieutenant Duncan; Lieutenant Omelson; Unknown Federal Bureau of Prison

Employees; Officer G. Duffy

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: January 27, 2016

 Filed: February 9, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 15-1605 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/09/2016 Entry ID: 4364968 
Former federal inmate Lori Irish appeals following the district court’s adverse

1

grant of summary judgment in her action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort

Claims Act. Irish’s primary challenge on appeal is to the magistrate judge’s orders

on nondispositive matters, but because she did not seek review by the district court,

this court lacks jurisdiction to consider her challenge. See Daley v. MariottInt’l, Inc.,

415 F.3d 889, 893 n.9 (8th Cir. 2005) (where parties do not consent to final

disposition by magistrate judge, this court lacks jurisdiction to hear direct appeal of

magistrate judge’s order on nondispositive pretrial matter). As to the claims thatIrish

has properly put before us with adequate briefing, see Hess v. Ables, 714 F.3d 1048,

1051 n.2 (8th Cir. 2013) (claim is waived where there is no briefing as to why

dismissal was improper), we have conducted the requisite de novo review, see Holt

v. Howard, 806 F.3d 1129, 1132 (8th Cir. 2015), and carefully considered Irish’s

arguments, and we find no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is

affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeffrey J.

Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Appellate Case: 15-1605 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/09/2016 Entry ID: 4364968