Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02889/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02889-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCO RAMIREZ,

Plaintiff,

 v.

COUNTY OF MARIN,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-02889 WHA

REQUEST FOR RESPONSES

By JANUARY 30 AT NOON, the parties shall please file responses (each not to exceed ten

pages, no footnotes and no attachments) to docket numbers 157 and 158 and this order. 

In pertinent part, Marin County shall please state with specificity which decision-makers (or

recommenders) listed as trial witnesses by the defense actually read which specific parts, if any,

of the Finnegan report prior to the decision to terminate plaintiff. Please be specific. If any

after-acquired evidence will be used at trial, please describe how those items will be moved into

evidence. Defense counsel shall also please explain how Trial Exhibits 136, 138 to 140, 143,

144, 146 to 148, 150 to 153 could possibly be admissible and through which witnesses 

(Dkt. No. 157 at 1, 7–8). 

Dated: January 28, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-02889-WHA Document 164 Filed 01/28/15 Page 1 of 1