Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01680/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01680-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Plaintiff previously filed a TRO application on March 3, 2006. Because defendants were not

served at that time, the Court has not yet ruled on that application. For the reasons discussed above,

plaintiff’s March 3, 2006, application for a TRO is also DENIED. 

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD STRAHAN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SUSAN LEA, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-01680 SI

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATIONS FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND

VACATING HEARING

On May 19, 2006, plaintiff filed the instant application for a temporary restraining order

(“TRO”).1 Plaintiff contends that he is being wrongfully prevented from registering from classes at San

Francisco State University (“SFSU”). According to plaintiff, if he is unable to register for classes by

the last day of the current semester, May 26, 2006, he will be formally expelled from SFSU and will

therefore be unable to complete his Masters of Science degree in Physics.

The California Attorney General’s Office responded by letter to plaintiff’s application on May

23, 2006. The letter states that May 26, 2006, is not a dispositive date in this matter, and that plaintiff’s

relationship to SFSU will not change in any way if the May 26, 2006, date passes. The Court interprets

this as a representation that plaintiff will not be prejudiced in any way if his TRO application is not

heard before May 26, 2006.

Accordingly, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s application for a TRO and VACATES the hearing

currently scheduled for May 26, 2006. Plaintiff shall file a regularly noticed motion for a preliminary

Case 3:06-cv-01680-SI Document 16 Filed 05/25/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

injunction by June 23, 2006. [Docket Nos. 4, 11]

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2006

 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01680-SI Document 16 Filed 05/25/06 Page 2 of 2