Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00970/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00970-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE

ALESA SCHACHTER (SBN 102542)

KELLIE M. MURPHY(SBN 189500)

JOHNSON SCHACHTER & LEWIS

A Professional Law Corporation

California Plaza

2180 Harvard Street, Suite 560

Sacramento, CA 95815

Telephone: (916) 921-5800

Facsimile: (916) 921-0247

Attorneys for Defendants LOS RIOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, EUNYOUNG

HWANG, MARISSA SAYAGO, RICHARD BOOTH, and BRUCE WERNER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHLEEN BALL,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LOS RIOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE

DISTRICT, Educational subdivision of

Sacramento; EUNYOUNG HWANG, both

individually and in her capacity as acting Head

of the Art Department of the Los Rios

Community College District; MARISSA

SAYAGO, both individually and in her

capacity as Alternate Head of the Art

Department of the Los Rios Community

College District; RICHARD BOOTH, both

individually and in his capacity as 

Dean of Instruction of the Los Rios Community

College District; BRUCE WERNER, both

individually and in his capacity as Vice

President of the Folsom Lake/El Dorado and

Rancho Cordova Centers of the Los Rios

Community College District, and DOES 1 to

1000, inclusive;

Defendants.

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CIV.S-04-0970 MCE JFM

STIPULATION AND ORDER

REGARDING EXPERT WITNESS

DISCLOSURE

IT IS STIPULATED by and between all parties, through their respective counsel, and with

the Court’s permission, that the date for expert witness disclosure pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, Rule 26(a)(2) be extended to November 16, 2006 (90 days before trial as required under

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 26(a)(2)(C)).

Case 2:04-cv-00970-MCE -EFB Document 31 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE

All other dates set forth in the Pretrial (Status) Scheduling Order, as modified by the parties’

earlier Stipulation Regarding Pretrial (Status) Scheduling Order shall remain, including the Trial and

Pre-Trial Conference. The parties submit that good cause exists to extend the date as set forth above

on the following grounds: the parties are continuing to discuss the possibility of mediation prior to

incurring the substantial expense associated with expert witnesses; the parties and witnesses have

been unavailable at various times throughout the litigation; and the issues remaining in this action

are numerous and complex.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: September 28, 2006 JOHNSON SCHACHTER & LEWIS

A Professional Law Corporation

 /s/ Kellie M. Murphy 

KELLIE M. MURPHY

Attorneys for Defendants

DATED: September 28, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF FRANK J. DEBENEDETTO

 /s/ Frank J. DeBenedetto 

FRANK J. DEBENEDETTO

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 29, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00970-MCE -EFB Document 31 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2