Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-492/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Master File No. 3:07-CV-05944-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE 

FOR LGE’S MOTION FOR BIFURCATION AND BENCH TRIAL 

[Stipulating parties listed on signature page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

Master File No. 3:07-CV-05944-JST 

MDL No. 1917

This Document Relates To: 

Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corp. v. 

LG Electronics, Inc., et al, Case No. 11-cv05514

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING 

AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR 

DEFENDANT LG ELECTRONICS, 

INC.’S MOTION FOR BIFURCATION 

AND BENCH TRIAL

 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 4792 Filed 08/22/16 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -1- Master File No. 3:07-CV-05944-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE 

FOR LGE’S MOTION FOR BIFURCATION AND BENCH TRIAL 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corporation (“Plaintiffs”) are 

the only remaining Plaintiffs in Case No. 11-cv-05514 (“Sears/Kmart case”); 

WHEREAS, LG Electronics, Inc. (“LGE”) is the only remaining Defendant in the 

Sears/Kmart case; 

WHEREAS, LGE filed its motion for bifurcation and bench trial in the Sears/Kmart case 

on August 12, 2016 (ECF No. 4759), pursuant to this Court’s order issued at ECF No. 4623; 

WHEREAS, that motion is currently noticed for a September 22, 2016 hearing; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and LGE are already scheduled to appear before this Court on 

September 20, 2016 for a status conference at 2:00pm, see ECF No. 4689; 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-12, PLAINTIFFS AND LGE, BY AND THROUGH THEIR 

RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The parties agree to the following briefing deadlines for LGE’s motion for bench 

trial and bifurcation (ECF No. 4759), if convenient for the Court: August 30, 2016 for 

Sears/Kmart’s opposition brief; and September 8, 2016 for LGE’s reply brief. 

2. If convenient to the Court, the parties agree to move the hearing on LGE’s motion 

for bifurcation and bench trial (ECF No. 4759) to the September 20, 2016 status conference. 

Dated: August 19, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

By: /s/ Brad Brian 

Brad Brian (State Bar No. 079001) 

Gregory J. Weingart (State Bar No. 157997) 

E. Martin Estrada (State Bar No. 223802) 

355 South Grand Avenue 

35th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 

Tel: (213) 683-9100 

Fax: (213) 687-3702 

E-mail: brad.brian@mto.com 

 gregory.weingart@mto.com 

 martin.estrada@mto.com 

Attorneys for Defendant LG Electronics, Inc. 

 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 4792 Filed 08/22/16 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -2- Master File No. 3:07-CV-05944-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE 

FOR LGE’S MOTION FOR BIFURCATION AND BENCH TRIAL 

KENNY NACHWALTER, P.A. 

By: /s/ William J. Blechman 

Richard Alan Arnold, Esquire 

William J. Blechman, Esquire 

Douglas Patton, Esquire 

Samuel J. Randall, Esquire 

Christina Ceballos-Levy 

KENNY NACHWALTER, P.A.

201 S. Biscayne Boulevard 

Suite 1100 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Tel: (305) 373-1000 

Fax: (305) 372-1861 

E-mail: rarnold@knpa.com 

 wblechman@knpa.com 

 dpatton@knpa.com 

 srandall@knpa.com 

 ccl@knpa.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sears, Roebuck and Co. 

and Kmart Corp.

 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 

It is so stipulated and agreed to by the parties. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

 United States District Judge 

547729.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

August 22, 2016

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 4792 Filed 08/22/16 Page 3 of 3