Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00633/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00633-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER

86634355.1 0052161-02673 

THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050)

thomas.woods@stoel.com

BRYAN L. HAWKINS (SB #238346) 

bryan.hawkins@stoel.com

STOEL RIVES LLP

500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 447-0700 

Facsimile: (916) 447-4781 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. and 

NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING 

CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RAY PALMA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.; 

NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING 

CORPORATION, and Does 1 through 20, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00633-KJM-CKD

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

REQUEST TO CONTINUE JUNE 3, 

2016 HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO REMAND AND TO 

EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

INTENDED FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

ORDER 

The court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the parties’ Stipulated Request 

(ECF No. 14), as follows: 

1. Plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint no later than June 6, 2016. 

2. The June 3, 2016 hearing on plaintiff’s motion to remand (ECF No. 9) and 

defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) is RESET for July 29, 2016 at 10:00 

AM in Courtroom 3 before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller.1 

 

1

 The parties requested the hearing be reset for July 8, 2016, but July 8 is not a law and motion calendar date. July 29 

is the next available hearing date. 

Case 2:16-cv-00633-KJM-CKD Document 15 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 2
STOEL RIVES LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SACRAMENTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER

86634355.1 0052161-02673 

3. The parties’ request to extend the time for defendants to respond to plaintiff’s 

intended first amended complaint is DENIED without prejudice. The parties may 

renew such a request upon plaintiff’s filing of the first amended complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 19, 2016 

Case 2:16-cv-00633-KJM-CKD Document 15 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 2