Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00541/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00541-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE COLLINS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

DERRAL ADAMS, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-00541-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 9)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

CLAIMS

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 31, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that Grounds One, Two, and Four be DISMISSED for

failure to state a cognizable federal claim. These Findings and

Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice

that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from

the date of service of that order. On September 20, 2005,

Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

Case 1:05-cv-00541-OWW -DLB Document 12 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 31, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Grounds One, Two, and Four are DISMISSED for failure to

state a cognizable federal claim; and

3. The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for

further proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00541-OWW -DLB Document 12 Filed 11/01/05 Page 2 of 2