Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03515/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03515-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANNY TROXELL, 

Petitioner,

 vs.

ROBERT HOREL, Warden,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 07-3515 TEH (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

AND INSTRUCTIONS TO

THE CLERK

On July 5, 2007, Petitioner, a state prisoner incarcerated at Pelican Bay

State Prison in Crescent City, California, filed the instant pro se petition for a writ

of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging actions of the California

Board of Prison Terms' ("BPT"). Petitioner has paid the filing fee. 

However, at the time of filing this petition, Petitioner already had pending

before this Court another petition raising several of the same claims that he raises

in this petition. It is unclear whether Petitioner was attempting to file an

amended petition on his previously filed case, Case No. C 07-1583 TEH (PR), or

whether it was his intention to commence a new action. Regardless of

Petitioner’s intent, because the petition raises claims in common, it is in the

interest of judicial economy that these claims be raised and considered together. 

Therefore, the instant petition will be dismissed as unnecessary and Petitioner

will be given an opportunity to file an amended petition on Case No. C 07-1583

TEH (PR) within thirty days from the date of this order. The Court notes that

Case 3:07-cv-03515-TEH Document 3 Filed 12/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Petitioner must include all the claims he intends to pursue in the amended petition

and is reminded that an amended complaint filed as a matter of course or after

leave of court supersedes the original complaint. "[A] plaintiff waives all causes

of action alleged in the original complaint which are not alleged in the amended

complaint." London v. Coopers & Lybrand, 644 F.2d 811, 814 (9th Cir. 1981). 

The Clerk shall send Petitioner a copy of this court’s form habeas petition,

enter judgment and close the file. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: 12/03/07 THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-03515-TEH Document 3 Filed 12/04/07 Page 2 of 2