Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05038/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05038-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 13-cv-05038 NC 

ORDER REQUESTING 

RESPONSIVE DECLARATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE CORP., and 

others, 

Plaintiffs and 

Counterdefendants, 

 v. 

SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., 

Defendant and 

Counterclaimant. 

Case No. 13-cv-05038 NC

ORDER REQUESTING 

RESPONSIVE DECLARATION 

Re: Dkt. No. 82 

On March 13, 2015, SSC filed a motion to seal two exhibits and portions of a joint 

discovery letter brief, on the ground that they contain or discuss highly confidential 

business information of Enplas because Enplas has designated those documents as 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under the Stipulated 

Protective Order in this case. Dkt. No. 82. 

The Local Rules provide that “[a] sealing order may issue only upon a request that 

establishes that the document, or portions thereof, are privileged, protectable as a trade 

secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law . . . . The request must be narrowly 

tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material, and must conform with Civil L.R. 79-

5(d).” Civ. L.R. 79-5(b). “Reference to a stipulation or protective order that allows a party 

Case 3:13-cv-05038-NC Document 89 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Case No

ORDER

RESPON

to design

or portio

further r

designat

order,” t

5(d)(1)(A

the filing

responsi

to File U

record n

L.R. 79-

H

has not f

file such

seal, SS

joint lett

IT

D

. 13-cv-0503

R REQUEST

NSIVE DEC

nate certain

ons thereof,

requires tha

ted as confi

the designat

A) establish

g of the mo

ive declarat

Under Seal i

no earlier th

-5(e)(2). 

ere, more th

filed a respo

h a responsi

C may file 

ter brief and

T IS SO OR

ate: March 

38 NC 

ING 

CLARATION

n document

, are sealabl

at, “[i]f the S

idential by t

ting party “

hing that all

otion to file 

tion as requ

is denied, th

han 4 days, a

han four da

onsive decl

ive declarat

in the publi

d exhibits c

RDERED. 

20, 2015 

 

N

s as confide

le.” Civ. L

Submitting 

the opposin

“must file a 

l of the des

under seal.

uired by sub

he Submitti

and no later

ys have pas

laration in a

tion by Mar

ic record, a

currently sou

 

 2 

ential is not

.R. 79-5(d)

Party is see

ng party or a

declaration

ignated mat

 “If the De

bsection 79-

ing Party m

r than 10 da

ssed since S

accordance 

rch 25, 2015

s permitted

ught to be s

 ____ Nath

Unit

t sufficient 

(1)(A). Civ

eking to file

a non-party

n as require

aterial is sea

esignating P

-5(e)(1) and

may file the 

ays, after th

SSC filed it

with Rule 7

5, and the C

d by Rule 79

sealed. 

__________ hanael M. C

ted States M

to establish

vil Local Ru

e under sea

y pursuant to

ed by subsec

alable” with

Party does n

d the Admin

document i

he motion is

ts motion to

79-5(e). If 

Court denie

9-5(e)(2), th

__________ Cousins 

Magistrate J

h that a docu

ule 79-5(e)

al a docume

o a protecti

ction 79-

hin four day

not file a 

nistrative M

in the publi

s denied.” C

o seal, but E

Enplas doe

s the motio

he portions 

_____ 

Judge 

ument, 

(1) 

nt 

ve 

ys of 

Motion 

c 

Civ. 

Enplas 

es not 

on to 

of the 

Case 3:13-cv-05038-NC Document 89 Filed 03/20/15 Page 2 of 2