Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00457/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00457-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASETEK DANMARK A/S,

Plaintiff,

v.

CMI USA, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-00457-JST 

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO 

APPROVE PROPOSED JUDGMENT AS 

TO FORM OR TO FILE OBJECTIONS

Re: ECF No. 253

On April 21, 2015, the Court issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law resolving 

issues that remained after trial in this case. ECF No. 249. The Court found in Plaintiff’s favor and 

concluded that Defendant had failed to prove its defenses of obviousness, lack of written 

description, and indefiniteness. Id. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a proposed form of final 

judgment, id. at 29, which Plaintiff did on May 1, 2015, see ECF No. 253. 

The Court now orders Defendant, within five court days of the date of this order, either to 

approve the proposed final judgment as to form or to file objections to it. If Defendant objects to 

the proposed judgment, Plaintiff shall file any reply to the objections within five court days of 

Defendant’s objections.

After considering the parties’ submissions, if any, the Court will enter final judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-00457-JST Document 257 Filed 05/12/15 Page 1 of 1