Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_19-cv-02075/USCOURTS-casd-3_19-cv-02075-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity Action

---

1 

19CV2075-JAH-LL 

4819-9544-5175v1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAE PROPERTIES, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AMTAX HOLDINGS 2001-XX, LLC, 

Defendant. 

__________________________________ 

AMTAX HOLDINGS 2001-XX, LLC and 

VICTORIA HEIGHTS LTD., 

Counter-Plaintiffs, 

v. 

JAE PROPERTIES, INC., 

Counter-Claim Defendant. 

 Case No.: 19cv2075-JAH-LL 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE 

/ / / 

Case 3:19-cv-02075-JAH-DDL Document 35 Filed 04/07/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 3
2 

19CV2075-JAH-LL

v

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On April 7, 2020, the Court held a conference call regarding the parties’ discovery 

dispute. Counsel for JAE Properties, Inc. (hereinafter “JAE”), Robert Berry and Carol 

Silberberg, and counsel for Amtax Holdings 2001-XX, LLC and Victoria Heights Ltd., 

(hereinafter “Amtax”), Craig Bessenger, Eric Pettit, and Jalle Dafa, participated in the 

conference. In regard to the dispute, the Court issues the following order: 

1. Mr. Berry stated that he planned to provide an updated privilege log and legal 

authority in support of his client’s position by the end of the day today, April 7, 

2020. 

2. Counsel for both parties also stated that they plan to continue meeting and conferring 

to informally resolve and/or narrow the dispute regarding documents withheld on 

the basis of attorney-client privilege in response to Amtax’s First Set of Requests for 

Production. 

3. The parties are ORDERED to continue meeting and conferring to informally 

resolve the dispute regarding Amtax’s first set of Requests for Production. 

4. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute, Amtax must file the motion to compel 

on or before 12:00 p.m. PST on April 13, 2020. 

5. JAE shall file any opposition to the motion to compel on or before 12:00 p.m. PST

April 16, 2020. 

6. Amtax shall file a reply on or before 12:00 p.m. PST on April 20, 2020. 

7. The parties’ motion and opposition shall each be limited to eight (8) pages in length. 

The disputed Requests for Production and the responses (and any supplemental 

responses, privilege log, etc.) should be attached as an Exhibit to Plaintiff’s briefing. 

Plaintiff’s reply shall be limited to four (4) pages. Upon completion of the briefing, 

the Court will take the matter under submission pursuant to Civil Local Rule 

7.1(d)(1) and no personal appearance will be required. 

/ / / 

Case 3:19-cv-02075-JAH-DDL Document 35 Filed 04/07/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 3
2 

19CV2075-JAH-LL

v

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

All other deadlines and requirements remain as previously set. 

See ECF Nos. 22, 34. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 7, 2020 

Case 3:19-cv-02075-JAH-DDL Document 35 Filed 04/07/20 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 3