Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01668/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01668-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

WITHDRAWAL OF VIA’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

ROBERT P. FELDMAN, State Bar No. 69602

JENNIFER A. OCHS, State Bar No. 174069 

MAURA L. REES, State Bar No. 191698 

MATTHEW R. REED, State Bar No. 196305 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

rfeldman@wsgr.com; jochs@wsgr.com; 

mrees@wsgr.com; mreed@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. USA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY 

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and VIA 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (USA), 

Defendants and Counterclaimants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY 

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTEL CORPORATION, 

Defendant and Counterclaimant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

Case No. 05-CV-01766 RMW (HRL) 

(Cases consolidated through claim 

construction) 

This document pertains to: 

Case No. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

WITHDRAWAL OF VIA’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL CCCC’S PRODUCTION OF 

DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING 

DOCUMENTS IMPROPERLY 

WITHHELD BASED ON CLAIMS OF 

PRIVILEGE WHICH HAVE BEEN 

WAIVED; AND TO DEEM ADMITTED 

VIA’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR 

ADMISSIONS 

Date: July 18, 2006 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Court: Courtroom 6, 4th floor

Before: Hon. Howard R. Lloyd 

*E-FILED ON 6/26/06*

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 150 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

WITHDRAWAL OF VIA’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

-2- 2904537_1.DOC 

WHEREAS: 

VIA Technologies, Inc. and VIA Technologies, Inc. (USA) (collectively “VIA”) has filed 

a “Motion to Compel CCCC’s Production Of Documents, Including Documents Improperly Withheld 

Based On Claims Of Privilege Which Have Been Waived; And To Deem Admitted VIA’s First Set Of 

Requests For Admissions” (“Motion to Compel”) which has been set for hearing on July 18, 2006 at 

10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Howard R. Lloyd; 

Plaintiff Computer Cache Coherency Corporation (“CCCC”) has represented that it will 

promptly produce drafts, correspondence, and emails regarding the original and revised 

AMD/CCCC agreements, upon receiving consent from AMD to do so; 

VIA and CCCC have resolved all other issues addressed by VIA’s Motion to Compel; 

THEREFORE, the Parties STIPULATE THAT: 

Plaintiff Computer Cache Coherency Corporation (“CCCC”) will promptly produce 

drafts, correspondence, and emails regarding the original and revised AMD/CCCC agreements, 

upon receiving consent from AMD to do so; and 

VIA hereby withdraws its Motion to Compel. 

 

Dated: June 22, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Jennifer Ochs 

Robert P. Feldman 

Jennifer A. Ochs 

Maura L. Rees 

Matthew R. Reed 

Attorneys for Defendants and 

Counterclaimants 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (USA) 

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 150 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

WITHDRAWAL OF VIA’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

-3- 2904537_1.DOC 

Dated: June 22, 2006 HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Omer Salik 

Omer Salik 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and 

Counterdefendants 

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY 

CORPORATION 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: By: 

Hon. Howard R. Lloyd 

United States Magistrate Judge 

June 26, 2006

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 150 Filed 06/26/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

WITHDRAWAL OF VIA’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

-4- 2904537_1.DOC 

Attestation Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B 

Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document was obtained from each of the other signatories. 

Dated: June 22, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Jennifer Ochs 

Robert P. Feldman 

Jennifer A. Ochs 

Maura L. Rees 

Matthew R. Reed 

Attorneys for Defendants and 

Counterclaimants 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (USA) 

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 150 Filed 06/26/06 Page 4 of 4