Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01777/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01777-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01777-EMC 

DM2\6768328.1

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

Karineh Khachatourian (CA SBN 202634) 

kkhachatourian@duanemorris.com 

Daniel T. McCloskey (CA SBN 191944) 

dtmccloskey@duanemorris.com 

Anjali Moorthy (CA SBN 299963) 

amoorthy@duanemorris.com 

2745 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194 

Telephone: 650.847.4150 

Facsimile: 650.847.4151 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

DYNATRACE LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DYNATRACE LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

JAMES RAMEY, an individual, and 

DEVICEBITS LLC, an Ohio limited 

liability company, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:16-cv-01777-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Case 3:16-cv-01777-EMC Document 19 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01777-EMC 

DM2\6768328.1

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 (b), Plaintiff Dynatrace LLC. (“Dynatrace”) and Defendants 

James Ramey and DeviceBits LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned 

attorneys, hereby state and stipulate, subject to Court approval, as follows: 

WHEREAS, on April 27, 2016, this Court issued an Order scheduling an initial Case 

Management Conference in this matter for July 21, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. and providing that the parties 

are to file a joint Case Management Conference Statement one week prior to the conference (see 

D.I. 13); 

WHEREAS, lead counsel for Dynatrace has pre-paid vacation travel to New York City 

planned for July 21, 2016; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Dynatrace and Defendants have met and conferred and are 

amenable to continuing the Case Management Conference by one week, to July 28, 2016 (or, if the 

Court is not available on that date, to the next available date on the Court’s calendar), with the joint 

Case Management Conference Statement to be filed one week prior, on July 21, 2016; 

WHEREAS, there have been no previous time modifications, except that the Parties have 

stipulated to a 15 day extension of time for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the 

Complaint, to May 24, 2016, as set forth in a contemporaneous filing; 

WHEREAS, this requested continuance will have minimal to no impact on the case 

management schedule, as no schedule has been adopted and no trial date has been set; 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to this Court’s 

approval, that the initial Case Management Conference in this matter shall be continued by one 

week, to July 28, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 5, (or, if the Court is not available on that date, 

to the next available date on the Court’s calendar), and the joint Case Management Conference 

Statement shall be filed one week prior, on July 21, 2016. 

 

Case 3:16-cv-01777-EMC Document 19 Filed 05/09/16 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01777-EMC 

DM2\6768328.1

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

Dated: May 6, 2016 By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian . 

 Karineh Khachatourian

Daniel T. McCloskey 

Anjali Moorthy 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

DYNATRACE LLC 

GORDON REES, LLP 

Dated: May 6, 2016 By: /s/ 

 Michael Pietrykowski 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

JAMES RAMEY and DEVICEBITS LLC

ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that 

the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

Dated: May 6, 2016 By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian 

 Karineh Khachatourian

Daniel T. McCloskey 

Anjali Moorthy 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

DYNATRACE LLC 

ORDER 

Having read and considered the foregoing Stipulation of the parties submitted herewith and 

for good cause shown, 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated:________________ _______________________ 

Hon. Edward M. Chen 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

May 9, 2016

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-01777-EMC Document 19 Filed 05/09/16 Page 3 of 3