Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05296/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05296-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TINO JOSEPH,

Plaintiff, CV F 03 5296 REC WMW P

vs. ORDER 

GAIL LEWIS, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has screened plaintiff’s complaint

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and finds that it appears to state cognizable claims for relief

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Burnett, Robicheaux, Neill, Lewis, Grannis and

Koshell in accordance with the order of May 24, 2005.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

WARDEN GAIL LEWIS

M. KOSHELL

QUINNN-ROBICHEAEX

S. NEILL

Case 1:03-cv-05296-AWI-WMW Document 15 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

N. GRANNIS

D. BURNETT

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff six USM-285 forms, six summonses, a

Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

first amended complaint filed June 4, 2003.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to

the court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Seven copies of the endorsed first amended complaint filed June 4, 2003. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 14, 2006 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05296-AWI-WMW Document 15 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 2