Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-05232/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-05232-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAN L. WHITNEY, JANET R.

HADLEY, MARGARET A. KORNOWBROWN, ERIC BRELLE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CHARLES WURTZ, VERISCAPE, INC.,

RENEE TADLOCK, REGINA

RYGELIS, WILL ARNTZ, SAM

JACOBS, GARY BERKOWITS, BRIAN

ROE and DOES 1-20,

Defendants. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 04-05232 PVT

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 

 On July 18, 2006, the Court held a Case Management Conference. David R. Beck

appeared for Plaintiffs Whitney, Hadley, Kornow-Brown and Brelle.. Brian Baker appeared for

Wurtz, Veriscape, Inc., Tadlock, Rygelis, Berkowitz and Roe. Jeffrey Kravitz appeared by

telephone for Will Arntz and Sam Jacobs. John Beranbaum appeared by telephone for Mr.

Dodd.

 John Beranbaum indicated that his client did consent to the Magistrate Judge. The

written consent shall be filed by July 21, 2006. 

 Due to the number of parties and the complexity of the issues, this case management

Case 5:04-cv-05232-PVT Document 157 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 A copy of Judge Trumbull’s standing order is also available on the court’s

website at www.cand.uscourts.gov by clicking first on the “Judges” button, then on Judge

Trumbull’s name, then on the “Magistrate Judge Trumbull's Standing Orders” link, and finally

on the bullet for “Mag Judge Trumbull's General Order for all purposes (04/28/2003).”

conference is continued to 2:00 p.m., November 21, 2006. On that date the parties shall be ready

to set the discovery cutoff, the pretrial motions’ hearing , the pretrial conference and the trial

date. The parties have agreed and IT IS SO ORDERED that by November 9, 2006 they will

have propounded and responded to all document requests, interrogatories and requests for

admissions. Absent leave of court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure’s limitations on these

discovery devices shall apply. 

 Nothing in this ORDER precludes the parties from noticing depositions. At the next

conference all depositions which remain shall be scheduled.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with the Standing Order for

Civil Practice in Cases Assigned for All Purposes to Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull (rev.

4/25/03), a copy of which is attached hereto,1

 with regard to the timing and content of the Joint

Pretrial Statement, and all other pretrial submissions.

 

 

DATE: July 18, 2006 

 ____________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:04-cv-05232-PVT Document 157 Filed 07/19/06 Page 2 of 2