Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06316/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06316-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONATHON MORGAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DURAN, et al., 

Defendants. 

 /

1:02-cv-06316-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 128)

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Docs. 103, 104)

Plaintiff, Jonathon Morgan (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 10, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that recommended Defendants’ motion for summary

judgment be denied and recommended Plaintiff’s motion for summary

judgment be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were

served on the parties and which contained notice to plaintiff

that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to

be filed within twenty (20) days. To date, no party has filed

Case 1:02-cv-06316-AWI-DLB Document 130 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 10,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed

September 26, 2005, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment,

filed September 28, 2005, are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06316-AWI-DLB Document 130 Filed 09/15/06 Page 2 of 2