Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05903/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05903-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842 

Email: keggleton@wsgr.com 

RODNEY G. STRICKLAND, State Bar No. 161934 

Email: rstricklandmwser.com 

DALE BISH, ~tate%arko. 235390 

Email: dbish@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NETFLIX, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

JANE DOE, individually; NELLY VALDEZ- ) CASE NO.: C09-05903-JW-PVT 

MAROUEZ. ANTHONY SINOPOLI. PAUL NAVLRRO; individually and on behalf of a class j STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

of similarly situated individuals, ) ORDER REGARDING 

) DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO THE 

Plaintiffs, ) COMPLAINT 

i 

NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and ) DOES 1 THROUGH 50, inclusive, 1 

Defendants. j 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed and served a class action complaint alleging certain claims 

against defendant Netflix, Inc. ("Defendant") for alleged violations of certain privacy and 

consumer protection statutes; 

WHEREAS, Defendant has received one 30-day extension of time to respond to the 

complaint; 

WHEREAS, Defendant has requested and Plaintiffs have agreed to an additional 30-day 

extension of time for Defendant to respond to the complaint; and 

STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO -1- 

THE COMPLAINT 

CASENO. C09-05903-JW-PVT 

Case 5:09-cv-05903-JW Document 11 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 4
WHEREAS, this proposed extension would have no effect on the current schedule for the 

case; 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that: 

1. Defendant shall respond to the complaint no later than March 10,2010 

2. This stipulation is without prejudice to the rights, claims, or defenses of any party, 

and shall not be used by Defendant as evidence of, or to support any argument that, Plaintiffs 

have not timely pursued their claims or have not been diligent. 

Dated: January 27, 2010 

Dated: January 27,2010 

S/ Rodney G. Strickland. Jr. 

Keith E. Eggleton 

Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NETFLIX, INC. 

S/ David C. Parisi 

Scott A. Kamber 

David A. Stampley 

KamberEdelson, LLC 

Joseph H. Malley 

Law Office of Joseph H. Malley 

David C. Parisi (SBN 162248) 

Suzanne Havens Beckman (SBN 188814) 

Parisi & Havens LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

STrPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO -2- 

THE COMPLAINT 

CASENO. C09-05903-JW-PVT 

Case 5:09-cv-05903-JW Document 11 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Defendant shall respond to the complaint no later than March 10,2010. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

3ated: ,2010 

THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE 

STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO -3- 

THE COMPLAINT 

ZASENO. C09-05903-JW-PVT 

February 1

Case 5:09-cv-05903-JW Document 11 Filed 02/01/10 Page 3 of 4
I, Rodney G. Strickland, Jr., am the ECF User whose identification and password are 

being used to file the Stipulation Regarding Defendant's Response to the Complaint. I hereby 

attest David C. Parisi has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: January 27, 2010 

sl Rodnev G. Strickland. Jr. 

Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NETFLIX, INC. 

STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO -4- 

THE COMPLAINT 

CASENO. C09-05903-JW-PVT 

Case 5:09-cv-05903-JW Document 11 Filed 02/01/10 Page 4 of 4