Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05607/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05607-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FREDERICK LEE,

Plaintiff

vs.

CITY OF MADERA, MADERA POLICE

DEPARTMENT; OFFICER JOCELYN

BECK, OFFICER WARREN WEBSTER,

SGT. JOHN R. MARKLE and MICHAEL B.

KIME, Chief of the Madera City Police

Department, in his Individual and Official

Capacity. 

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CIV F 04-5607 AWI DLB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AND RESETTING DUE DATE FOR

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY BRIEFING

Current MSJ Date: October 6, 2008

Time: 1:30

Courtroom: 2

Trial Date: April 21, 2009

THE PARTIES, through their respective counsel, stipulate that the Defendants’ Motion

for Summary Judgment be continued from October 6, 2008 to October 27, 2008 at 1:30 p.m., in

Courtroom 2.

The stipulation is based on the fact that due to the press of other business counsel for

Defendant does not expect to be able to complete the reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to the

pending Motion For Summary Judgment by the date it is currently due on October 1, 2008. 

Although the parties have stipulated that Defendants’ reply to Plaintiff’s opposition will be filed

and served not later than October 22, 2008, Local Rule 78-230(d) requires that a reply brief be

Case 1:04-cv-05607-LJO-DLB Document 62 Filed 10/02/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

filed not later than 5 court days prior to the date of the hearing.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of October 6,

2008, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. The hearing on Defendants’ motion

for summary judgment previously set for October 6, 2008, is hereby continued to October 27,

2008 at 1:30 p.m. The court MODIFIES the parties’ stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 78-

230(d) to require that Defendants file and serve their reply brief not later than October 20, 2008.

DATED: September 30, 2008 WEAKLEY, RATLIFF, ARENDT & McGUIRE, LLP

/s/ Benjamin L. Ratliff

By: ______________________________________

Benjamin L. Ratliff

Attorney for Defendant City of Madera

DATED: September 30, 2008 THE LAW OFFICE OF JACOB M. WEISBERG

/s/ Jacob M. Weisberg

By: ______________________________________

Jacob M. Weisberg

Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 1, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05607-LJO-DLB Document 62 Filed 10/02/08 Page 2 of 2