Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01576/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01576-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Sex Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HALEMA BUZAYAN, as an individual; No. 2:06-cv-1576-MCE-DAD

DR. JAMAL BUZAYAN, an individual; 

NAJAT ABDALLA DARRAT, an 

individual; MOHAMED BUZAYAN, by 

and through DR. JAMAL BUZAYAN, as 

Guardian Ad Litem for a minor; 

YOUSEF BUZAYAN, by and through 

DR. JAMAL BUZAYAN, as Guardian Ad 

Litem for a minor; ALI BUZAYAN, 

by and through DR. JAMAL BUZAYAN, 

as Guardian Ad Litem for a minor,

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER

THE CITY OF DAVIS; JAMES HYDE, 

individually and in his 

capacity as Chief of Police of the 

City of Davis Police Department; 

STEVEN PIERCE, individually and in 

his official capacity with the 

City of Davis Police Department; 

PHENG LY, individually and in his 

capacity as an officer of the City 

of Davis Police Department; BEN 

HARTZ, individually and in his 

capacity as an officer of the City 

of Davis Police Department; DAVID 

HENDERSON, individually and in his 

capacity as District Attorney for 

the Yolo County Office of the 

District Attorney; PATRICIA FONG, 

individually and in her capacity 

as Deputy District Attorney for 

Case 2:06-cv-01576-MCE-DAD Document 189 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Yolo County Office of the 

District Attorney and member of 

the Davis Police Department 

Community Advisory Board; DOUGLAS 

THORN, individually and in his 

capacity as counsel for Yolo County 

and the City of Davis; 

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs’ request that the

hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, currently set

for hearing on January 14, 2010, be continued because of the

unavailability of Plaintiffs’ counsel that day. Irrespective of

that request, however, the Court deems it necessary to continue

the hearing for its own calendaring purposes. Consequently,

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 175) is reset

for hearing on January 28, 2010 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 7, 2010

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01576-MCE-DAD Document 189 Filed 01/08/10 Page 2 of 2