Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02033/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02033-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MODIFICATION OF

SCHEDULING ORDER

2:12-CV-02033-KJM-AC 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

EDWIN PAIRAVI (STATE BAR NO. 257290) edwin@pairavilaw.com 

PAIRAVI LAW, P.C. 

1875 Century Park East, Suite 1025 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Telephone: 310-789-2063 

Facsimile: 310-789-2064 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

June Riddick, Patricia Hardy, Natalie Maderos, Valerie Lynn and Lisa Vales 

DAVID B. SIMPSON (STATE BAR NO. 106326) dave@wolfsim.com 

ADAM N. BOUAYAD (STATE BAR NO. 248087) adam@wolfsim.com 

WOLFLICK AND SIMPSON 

130 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 410 

Glendale, California 91203 

Telephone: 818-243-8300 

Facsimile: 818-243-0122 

Attorneys for Defendant 

YP ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING LLC, 

formerly known as YP WESTERN DIRECTORY 

LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JUNE RIDDICK; PATRICIA HARDY; 

NATALIE MADEROS; VALERIE 

LYNN; and LISA VALES, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AT&T; YP WESTERN DIRECTORY 

LLC, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:12-CV-02033-KJM-AC

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER MODIFIYING COURT’S 

SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER 

THEREON 

Plaintiffs June Riddick, Patricia Hardy, Natalie Maderos, Valerie Lynn and 

Lisa Vales (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant YP ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING 

LLC, formerly known as YP WESTERN DIRECTORY LLC, (“YP”) (collectively 

Case 2:12-cv-02033-KJM-AC Document 85 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 7
- 1 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MODIFICATION OF

SCHEDULING ORDER

2:12-CV-02033-KJM-AC 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

referred to as the “Parties”) by and through their undersigned counsel of record, 

here by stipulate, and by this Stipulation request the Court's approval, to the 

following: 

WHEREAS, Defendant does not object to an additional modification of the 

Court’s scheduling order because it intends to file a motion for summary judgment 

and seeks to preclude any argument by Plaintiffs that they were denied their fair 

right to conduct discovery. 

1. The Parties have diligently litigated this action. For example: 

a. The parties continue to speak directly about the case; about 

appropriate processes for moving the case forward; about 

possibilities for future resolution of some or all issues; and about 

litigation efficiency. 

b. Plaintiffs have deposed multiple individuals to date; however, 

Plaintiffs expect to take the deposition of five to six additional 

witnesses, some of whom reside outside of the State. 

c. However, on two (2) occasions Defendant postponed important 

depositions, including the Person Most Qualified for the 

Defendant. That deposition is now scheduled for July 22, 2016, 

and July 29, 2016. 

/// 

Case 2:12-cv-02033-KJM-AC Document 85 Filed 08/03/16 Page 2 of 7
- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MODIFICATION OF

SCHEDULING ORDER

2:12-CV-02033-KJM-AC 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

d. Furthermore, there is substantial documentation which has not 

been produced by Defendant. The parties have continued the 

meet and confer process, and Defendant has agreed to 

supplement a substantial portion of the Request for Production 

of Documents. These documents are critical in preparing 

Plaintiffs’ case for trial. 

e. Defendant has just modified its initial disclosure to include a 

new witness, who lives out of State. Although, Plaintiffs had 

requested to depose this individual, Defendant failed to provide 

the last known address and phone number for this individual, 

making it impossible for Plaintiffs to depose the witness. Now 

that Defendant has provided the witnesses contact information 

in its modified additional disclosure, Plaintiffs will have an 

opportunity to depose the new witness who lives out of state. 

f. Plaintiff had also requested the deposition of multiple other 

individuals. Defendant has failed to provide last known address 

and phone number and have stated that they are no longer 

employed by Defendant. 

2. In order to fully and properly prepare this matter for trial and in order 

to properly oppose Defendant’s summary judgment motion, Plaintiffs 

require additional time to conduct depositions and fully prepare their 

Case 2:12-cv-02033-KJM-AC Document 85 Filed 08/03/16 Page 3 of 7
- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MODIFICATION OF

SCHEDULING ORDER

2:12-CV-02033-KJM-AC 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

case. Additionally, while Defendant does not oppose and stipulates to 

an order modifying the Court’s Scheduling Order, it does so because it 

intends to file a motion for summary judgment and seeks to preclude 

any argument by Plaintiffs that they were denied their fair right to 

discover; and in order to secure additional time to file its motion for 

summary judgment in the event the discovery cut-off date is extended. 

 3. The current Scheduling Order is set forth below: 

Disclosure of Expert Witnesses April 29, 2016 

Close of All Discovery July 29, 2016 

Settlement Conference August 15, 2016

Last Date for Hearing Dispositive Motions September 23, 2016 

Deadline to File Joint Pretrial Statement September 27, 2016 

Final Pretrial Conference October 7, 2016 

Jury Trial October 17, 2016 

Given the volume of Plaintiffs’ allegations and issues and the written 

discovery and depositions still to be completed, multiple depositions to still be 

completed, Plaintiffs propose the following final modified Scheduling Order and 

respectfully request this Court's approval of the same: 

Disclosure of Expert Witnesses April 29, 2016 

 [UNCHANGED] 

Settlement Conference October 17, 2016 

Case 2:12-cv-02033-KJM-AC Document 85 Filed 08/03/16 Page 4 of 7
- 4 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MODIFICATION OF

SCHEDULING ORDER

2:12-CV-02033-KJM-AC 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

Close of All Discovery November 28, 2016 

Last Date for Hearing Dispositive Motions January 27, 2017 

Deadline to File Joint Pretrial Statement January 31, 2017 

Final Pretrial Conference February 10, 2017 

Jury Trial February 20, 2017 

This is so stipulated. 

Dated: July 20, 2016 WOLFLICK & SIMPSON

By: /s/ Adam N. Bouayad 

DAVID B. SIMPSON 

ADAM N. BOUAYAD 

Attorneys for Defendant YP ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING 

LLC, formerly known as YP WESTERN DIRECTORY LLC 

Dated: July 20, 2016 PAIRAVI LAW, P.C.

By: /s/ Edwin Pairavi 

EDWIN PAIRAVI 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs June Riddick, Patricia Hardy, Natalie Maderos, Valerie Lynn and Lisa Vales 

Case 2:12-cv-02033-KJM-AC Document 85 Filed 08/03/16 Page 5 of 7
- 5 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MODIFICATION OF

SCHEDULING ORDER

2:12-CV-02033-KJM-AC 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

ORDER 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

 Pursuant to stipulation between to the stipulation between Plaintiffs June 

Riddick, Patricia Hardy, Natalie Maderos, Valerie Lynn and Lisa Vales; and 

Defendant YP ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING LLC (formerly known as YP 

WESTERN DIRECTORY LLC), the Court modifies its current Scheduling Order 

as follows: 

Disclosure of Expert Witnesses April 29, 2016 

 [UNCHANGED] 

Settlement Conference December 5, 2016 at 9 

a.m. in Magistrate Judge 

Kendall J. Newman’s 

Chambers1

Close of All Discovery November 28, 2016 

Last Date for Hearing Dispositive Motions January 27, 2017 

Deadline to File Joint Pretrial Statement May 12, 2017 

Final Pretrial Conference June 2, 2017 

 

1

 The parties are directed to exchange non-confidential settlement conference 

statements seven (7) days prior to this settlement conference. These statements shall 

simultaneously be delivered to the Court using the following email address: 

kjnorders@caed.uscourts.gov. If a party desires to share additional confidential 

information with the Court, they may do so pursuant to the provisions of Local 

Rule 270(d) and (e). 

 

Case 2:12-cv-02033-KJM-AC Document 85 Filed 08/03/16 Page 6 of 7
- 6 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MODIFICATION OF

SCHEDULING ORDER

2:12-CV-02033-KJM-AC 

 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

Trial Briefs are due by June 26, 2017 

Jury Trial July 10, 2017 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 2, 2016 

Case 2:12-cv-02033-KJM-AC Document 85 Filed 08/03/16 Page 7 of 7