Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02852/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02852-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

-1- 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE 

CASE NO.: C-07-02852-MJJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Alan Himmelfarb 

LAW OFFICES OF ALAN HIMMELFARB 

2757 Leonis Blvd 

Los Angeles, CA 90058 

Telephone: (323) 585-8696 

Fax: (323) 585-8198 

consumerlaw1@earthlink.net 

Scott A. Kamber 

Ethan Preston 

KAMBER & ASSOCIATES, LLC 

11 Broadway, 22d Floor 

New York, NY 10004 

Telephone: (212) 920-3072 

Fax: (212) 202-6364 

skamber@kolaw.com 

epreston@kolaw.com 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MATTHEW ELVEY, an individual, and 

GADGETWIZ, INC., an Arizona 

corporation, on their own behalf and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs 

 v. 

 TD AMERITRADE, INC., a New York 

corporation, and DOES 1 to 100, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 07 2852 MJJ 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Judge: Martin J. Jenkins 

GROUNDS 

1. Plaintiffs Matthew Elvey and Gadgetwiz.com filed a First Amended Complaint 

against Defendant TD Ameritrade, Inc. (“TD Ameritrade”), on June 28, 2007, and Motion for 

Preliminary Injunction on July 10, 2007. TD Ameritrade filed a Motion to Dismiss the 

Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint on July 18, 2007. 

 

Case 4:07-cv-02852-SBA Document 44 Filed 11/28/07 Page 1 of 3
 

 -2- 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE 

CASE NO.: C-07-02852-MJJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2. In a proposed stipulated order filed by the parties on September 24, 2007, the 

parties explained that the parties are meeting and sharing information and on that basis, the 

parties requested that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion To Dismiss be removed 

from the Court’s calendar. 

 3. On September 26, 2007, the Court entered the stipulated order removing the 

motions from the Court’s calendar and permitting the parties to re-notice their respective motions 

on 14 days notice. 

 4. On October 9, 2007, the parties advised the Court by stipulation that the 

discussions referenced in the September 26 stipulated order were ongoing and sought a 

continuance of the Case Management Conference to allow the parties to determine the direction 

of the litigation. The Court thereafter continued the Case Management Conference to December 

4, 2007. The parties have been actively engaged in discussions over the past two months and 

the discussions are ongoing. 

5. Accordingly, the interests of the parties and the interests of judicial efficiency 

would be best served by continuing the Case Management Conference to enable the parties to 

complete their discussions. 

STIPULATION 

 1. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, that the Case 

Management Conference shall be continued from December 4, 2007 to January 22, 2008 at 2:00 

p.m. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL. 

Dated: November 27, 2007 By: /s/ Ethan Preston 

Ethan Preston 

Counsel for Plaintiffs Matthew Elvey and 

Gadgetwiz, Inc. and the putative class 

Case 4:07-cv-02852-SBA Document 44 Filed 11/28/07 Page 2 of 3
 

 -3- 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE 

CASE NO.: C-07-02852-MJJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: November 27, 2007 By: /s/ Lee H. Rubin 

Lee H. Rubin 

Mayer Brown LLP 

Two Palo Alto Square 

Suite 300 

Palo Alto, California 94306 

Counsel for Defendant 

TD AMERITRADE, Inc. 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, I, Lee Rubin, attest that I obtained 

concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: By: 

THE HONORABLE MARTIN J. JENKINS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

11/27/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

Case 4:07-cv-02852-SBA Document 44 Filed 11/28/07 Page 3 of 3