Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02499/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02499-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHUCK CONGDON, ET AL., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., 

Defendants.

CASE NO. 16-cv-02499-YGR 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION

Re: Dkt. No. 157 

The Court is in receipt of plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration 

regarding footnote nine of the Court’s previous order denying plaintiffs’ motion regarding 

punitive damages (Dkt. No. 154). (Dkt. No. 157 (“Motion”).) 

Plaintiffs indicate that they “are not seeking reconsideration of the Court’s legal ruling that 

punitive damages are not available for [p]laintiffs’ conversion claim . . . .” (Motion at 2.) Rather, 

their request pertains to an ancillary footnote in the Court’s order. As the request relates to matters 

not material to the Court’s ruling, plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. See Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3). 

With respect to the substance of the request, counsel may address the matter orally at the 

next calling of the case. For the Court’s part, it considers the matter solely as overzealous 

advocacy with respect to plaintiffs’ motion regarding punitive damages, nothing more. 

This Order terminates Docket Number 157. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 25, 2018 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:16-cv-02499-YGR Document 159 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 1