Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01614/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01614-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 49:781 Forfeiture

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING

AGENCY,

NO. CIV. S-04-1614 WBS/KJM

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

BRYAN DEVORE, DEVORE 

CONSTRUCTION INC., DEVORE

EXCAVATION & SNOW REMOVAL,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

On May 31, 2005, the court heard oral argument

regarding defendant Bryan Devore’s request that the court

continue plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for 90 days to

allow him to obtain counsel. 

Jordan Kahn appeared on behalf of plaintiff Tahoe

Regional Planning Agency. Bryan Devore appeared on his own

behalf. After hearing argument from both parties, the court

determined that Mr. Devore could reasonably be expected to obtain

counsel within 30 days and that continuing plaintiff’s motion for

summary judgment for 30 days would not significantly prejudice

Case 2:04-cv-01614-WBS -KJM Document 23 Filed 06/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

plaintiff. Therefore, the court continued the hearing on

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment to June 27, 2005 at 1:30

p.m. 

 At that time, the parties will appear before this

court, and Mr. Devore will report on whether he has obtained

counsel for this matter. If Mr. Devore establishes that he has

obtained counsel, the court will reschedule the hearing on

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. However, if Mr. Devore

has failed to obtain counsel, the court will take plaintiff’s

motion for summary judgment under submission. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 1, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-01614-WBS -KJM Document 23 Filed 06/01/05 Page 2 of 2