Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00313/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00313-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

CASE NO. 4:15cv00313-DMR – STIPULATION RE MOTION TO DISMISS AND 

MOTION TO STRIKE DEADLINES AND HEARING DATE 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

Jeffrey B. Cereghino, SBN 099480 

Email: jbc@rocklawcal.com

Michael F. Ram, SBN 104805 

Email: mram@rocklawcal.com 

Susan Brown, SBN 287986

Email: sbrown@rocklawcal.com 

Matt Malone, SBN 221545

Email: mjm@rocklawcal.com

RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO 

 & KOPCZYNSKI LLP 

555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 433-4949 

Facsimile: (415) 433-7311 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Proposed Class 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EDD KING, DIEDRE KING, and ELMO 

SHEEN, on behalf of themselves and all 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, NATIONAL GENERAL 

ASSURANCE COMPANY, INTEGON 

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

INTEGON PREFERRED INSURANCE 

COMPANY, MIC GENERAL INSURANCE 

CORPORATION, PERSONAL EXPRESS 

INSURANCE COMPANY, SECURITY 

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

SEQUOIA INSURANCE COMPANY, 

and DOES1 through 200, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 4:15cv00313-DMR 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

STRIKE PORTIONS OF AND 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

COMPLAINT 

 

Case 4:15-cv-00313-DMR Document 27 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 2 Case4:15-cv-00313-DMR Document26 Filed03/16/15 Page1 of 2
CASE NO. 4:15cv00313-DMR – STIPULATION RE MOTION TO DISMISS AND 

MOTION TO STRIKE DEADLINES AND HEARING DATE 

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

The parties, by their counsel, STIPULATE that Plaintiff shall have two additional 

weeks to file their response to Defendants’ motion to strike and motion to dismiss, to and 

including March 31, 2015. Defendants shall have an additional week on Reply, which Reply 

shall be due on April 14, 2015. 

The parties further STIPULATE to continue the April 9, 2015 hearing date on these 

motions to April 28, 2015. 

Date: March 12, 2015 By: /s/ Jeffrey B. Cereghino

 Attorney for Plaintiffs and Proposed Class 

Date: March 12, 2015 By: /s/ Todd H. Stitt 

 Attorney for Defendants 

ORDER 

Good cause appearing, the Court CONTINUES the hearing on the motions to April 28, 

2015. Briefs shall be due according to the schedule stipulated to by counsel. 

Dated: _______ ___________________________________ 

 Hon. Judge Donna M. Ryu 

 

Case4:15-cv-00313-DMR Document26 Filed03/16/15 Page2 of 2

May 14, March 16, 2015

The court notes that April 28, 2015 is not one of this court's regularly-scheduled hearing dates. 

Accordingly, the hearing on the motions shall be held on May 14, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DATED: March 16, 2015 ______________________________ 

 Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu

Case 4:15-cv-00313-DMR Document 27 Filed 03/16/15 Page 2 of 2