Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01518/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01518-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1518

ANNMARIE SEREM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. 

(1:13-cv-02705-JMC)

Submitted: January 28, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

W. Daniel Mayes, SMITH, MASSEY, BRODIE, GUYNN & MAYES, P.A., 

Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, 

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Molly E. 

Carter, Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1518 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/26/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Annmarie Serem appeals the district court’s order accepting 

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the 

Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability 

insurance benefits. Our review of the Commissioner’s 

determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are 

supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law 

was applied. See Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 634 (4th Cir. 

2015). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, the 

administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

judgment. Serem v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 1:13-cv02705-JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-1518 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/26/2016 Pg: 2 of 2