Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00849/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00849-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN A. BRAUN )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

)

)

___________________________________ )

1:06-cv-00849-LJO WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING 

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE

MOTION TO DISMISS

[Doc. 5, 8]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se on a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. Pending

before the court is Respondent’s motion to dismiss.

On February 15, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations

herein. These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice

to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within

Case 1:06-cv-00849-LJO-WMW Document 12 Filed 06/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The court notes that the copy of the findings and recommendations served on Petitioner 1

was returned by the United States Postal Service. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service on a

party at their address of record is fully effective

2

thirty days. Petitioner did not file objections.

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708

F.2d 452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the th

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

 February 15, 2007, are a adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed as moot;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this

case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 4, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00849-LJO-WMW Document 12 Filed 06/04/07 Page 2 of 2