Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01556/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01556-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS HAUSCHILD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF RICHMOND AND

CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-01556 WHA

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Plaintiff Thomas Hauschild has filed an administrative motion to file under seal three

exhibits he appended in support of his motion for partial summary judgment. These exhibits are

a 2012 internal affairs investigative report, a 2007 internal affairs investigative report, and

plaintiff’s June 2011 email to his supervisor at the Richmond Police Department. Pursuant to

the parties’ protective order, defendants had marked these documents as confidential. Under

Civil Local Rule 79(e)(1), the “designating party must file a declaration . . . establishing that all

designated material is sealable” within four days of the filing of the administrative motion. It

has now been eight days since the motion was filed and defendants (the designating party) have

not filed any declaration. Accordingly, the administrative motion to file Exhibits A–C under

seal is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 21, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-01556-WHA Document 58 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 1