Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02730/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02730-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Injunction

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN and KURT F.

JOHNSON, d/b/a THE DOREAN GROUP,

THE OXFORD TRUST and UNIVERSAL

TRUST,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-02730 WHA

ORDER CLARIFYING ORDER

ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION TO

MODIFY THE PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION FOR 4577 OSPREY

WAY, EAGLE MOUNTAIN, UTAH

84005

By order dated September 18, 2006, this Court accepted and adopted the report and

recommendation on a Request to Modify the Preliminary Injunction for 4577 Osprey Way,

Eagle Mountain, Utah 84005, filed on August 31, 2006 by Magistrate Judge James. It has come

to the Court’s attention that an unknown individual sent title documents to defendants

Heineman and Johnson on the assumption that defendants would sign the paperwork. That

should never have occurred. The order modifying the preliminary injunction for the limited

purpose of reconveying any interests in the above-named property to Jim and Shirley Peterson

declared as a matter of law that title in the property was vested in the Petersons. Heineman and

Johnson were served with the request to modify the preliminary injunction and had the

opportunity to contest the transfer. By failing to respond to the request, they have waived any

objection to the reconveyance.

Case 3:05-cv-02730-WHA Document 78 Filed 10/19/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

No further title documents should be sent to defendants Heineman and Johnson for the

purpose of reconveying the above-named property. If any are, administrators of FCI Dublin (or

any other facility where defendants Heineman and Johnson are housed) should not provide

those documents to defendants. If any title documents are sent to defendants, FCI Dublin

administrators and/or counsel for the Bureau of Prisons shall notify the Court in writing of such

occurrence. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 19, 2006 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-02730-WHA Document 78 Filed 10/19/06 Page 2 of 2