Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01132/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01132-35/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMILCAR GUEVARA,

Plaintiff,

v.

A. RALLS,

Defendant.

No. 2:09-cv-1132 TLN KJN P

ORDER and FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed October 11, 2013, this court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial statement on 

or before December 13, 2013. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. The court will 

therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); 

Local Rule 110.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement.

2. The pretrial conference set for March 21, 2014, is vacated; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

Case 2:09-cv-01132-TLN-KJN Document 151 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: January 2, 2014

/guev1132.fpt

Case 2:09-cv-01132-TLN-KJN Document 151 Filed 01/02/14 Page 2 of 2