Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01658/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01658-73/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO 

COMPLY WITH PRE-TRIAL ORDER 

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359) 

Jason McDonell (SBN 115084) 

Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882) 

JONES DAY 

555 California Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 626-3939 

Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 

ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com 

jmcdonell@jonesday.com 

ewallace@jonesday.com 

Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784) 

Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776) 

JONES DAY 

1755 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Telephone: (650) 739-3939 

Facsimile: (650) 739-3900 

tglanier@jonesday.com 

jfroyd@jonesday.com 

Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

JONES DAY 

717 Texas, Suite 3300 

Houston, TX 77002 

Telephone: (832) 239-3939 

Facsimile: (832) 239-3600 

swcowan@jonesday.com 

jlfuchs@jonesday.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and 

TOMORROWNOW, INC. 

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 

DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

333 Main Street 

Armonk, NY 10504 

Telephone: (914) 749-8200 

Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 

dboies@bsfllp.com 

STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177) 

1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 874-1000 

Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 

sholtzman@bsfllp.com 

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257) 

GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468) 

HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045) 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 

Telephone: (415) 393-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 

donn.pickett@bingham.com 

geoff.howard@bingham.com 

holly.house@bingham.com 

DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049) 

JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227) 

500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7 

Redwood City, CA 94070 

Telephone: (650) 506-4846 

Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 

dorian.daley@oracle.com 

jennifer.gloss@oracle.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ORACLE USA, INC., et al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

ORACLE USA, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAP AG, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO 

COMPLY WITH PORTIONS OF PRETRIAL ORDER REGARDING UNDER 

SEAL REQUESTS AND PRE-MARKED 

EXHIBITS 

Case 4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document 724 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 1 - 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO 

COMPLY WITH PRE-TRIAL ORDER 

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3, Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International 

Corporation, Oracle EMEA Limited, and Siebel Systems, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants SAP 

AG, SAP America, Inc., and TomorrowNow, Inc. (together with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”) hereby 

submit this agreed-upon stipulation to extend time for the Parties to comply with the Court’s June 

11, 2009 Stipulated Revised Case Management and Pre-Trial Order (“June 11, 2009 Order”) to 

file any request regarding the treatment of confidential or sealed documents (“under seal 

requests”), to submit pre-marked exhibits to the Court, and to exchange pre-marked exhibits. 

The June 11, 2009 Order sets August 5, 2010 as the deadline to (1) file under seal requests, 

(2) submit pre-marked exhibits to the Court, and (3) exchange pre-marked exhibits. 

The Parties jointly request that the Court extend the deadline to file under seal requests for 

documents identified in the Parties’ August 5, 2010 disclosures to August 26, 2010. This 

extension allows the Parties an opportunity to review all documents and information disclosed on 

August 5, 2010 in accordance with the Court’s June 11, 2009 Order. The Parties believe that 

granting the requested extension promotes efficient case management, as the Parties would only 

file their under seal requests after, rather than prior to, having the benefit of full disclosure of the 

documents and information that will be offered as evidence in the other side’s case in chief. 

The Parties further jointly request that the Court extend the deadline to submit pre-marked 

exhibits to the Court to 7 calendar days after the Court has ruled on the Parties’ under seal 

requests. The Parties believe that this extension of time avoids burdening the Court with requests 

to hold certain documents, for which special treatment is requested, in camera while the Court 

considers the requests. 

The Parties also jointly request permission to submit pre-marked exhibits to the Court in 

electronic, rather than hard copy, format. The Parties believe that submission of electronic 

exhibits avoids burdening the Court with potentially voluminous hard-copy exhibits. 

Finally, the Parties jointly request that the Court grant a 5 calendar-day extension of the 

deadline to exchange pre-marked exhibits to August 10, 2010. In light of the potential volume of 

exhibits to be exchanged, the Parties believe that this extension of time is necessary to allow the 

Parties adequate time to process and pre-mark exhibits disclosed on August 5, 2010 in accordance 

Case 4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document 724 Filed 07/21/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO 

COMPLY WITH PRE-TRIAL ORDER 

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH

with the Court’s June 11, 2009 Order. 

This requested extension does not impact any other portion of the current case schedule, 

including the current November 1, 2010 trial date. The only purpose of this requested extension 

is to extend the deadlines noted above, and thus this requested extension shall not in any way 

affect any other rights or obligations of the Parties. 

DATED: July 19, 2010 JONES DAY 

By: /s/ Tharan Gregory Lanier 

Tharan Gregory Lanier 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and 

TomorrowNow, Inc. 

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the above signatory attests that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. 

DATED: July 19, 2010 

 

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

By: /s/ Zachary Alinder 

Zachary Alinder 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International 

Corporation, Oracle EMEA Limited, and 

Siebel Systems, Inc. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: July __, 2010 

 

Phyllis J. Hamilton 

United States District Judge 

21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document 724 Filed 07/21/10 Page 3 of 3