Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02962/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02962-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE RE INDIVIDUAL OFFICER DEFENDANTS AS TO 

PLAINTIFF ARTHUR MARTINEZ ONLY - Case Nos. C-03-2962 TEH (JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GREGORY M. FOX, STATE BAR NO. 070876 

Arlene C. Helfrich, State Bar No. 096461 

Bertrand, Fox & Elliot

The Waterfront Building - 2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

 FAX (415) 353-0990 

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND 

and POLICE CHIEF RICHARD WORD et al. 

(List of Additional Counsel Attached) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SRI LOUISE COLES, et al. 

 Plaintiffs 

vs.

CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal entity, et al. 

_____Defendants_______________________

LOCAL 10, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE 

AND WAREHOUSE UNION, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY OF OAKLAND; et al., 

 Defendants. 

_______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

File No. C03-2961 TEH (JL) 

File No. No. C 03-2962 TEH (JL)

Hon. Thelton E. Henderson

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER 

DISMISSING INDIVIDUAL OFFICER 

DEFENDANTS WITH PREJUDICE AS TO 

PLAINTIFF ARTHUR MARTINEZ ONLY 

Case 3:03-cv-02962-TEH Document 158 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 5
2

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE RE INDIVIDUAL OFFICER DEFENDANTS AS TO 

PLAINTIFF ARTHUR MARTINEZ ONLY - Case Nos. C-03-2962 TEH (JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JAMES B. CHANIN, SBN 76043 

JULIE M. HOUK, SBN 114968 

LAW OFFICES OF JAMES B. CHANIN 

3050 Shattuck Avenue 

Berkeley, California 94705 

Telephone: (510) 848-4752 

FAX (510) 848-5819 

JOHN L. BURRIS, SBN 69888 

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 

Oakland, CA 94621

Telephone: (510) 839-5200 

 FAX (510) 839-3882 

RACHEL LEDERMAN, SBN 130192 

NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD and 

Law Offices of Rachel Lederman and Alexsis C. Beach 

558 Capp Street 

San Francisco, CA 94110 

Telephone:(415) 282-9300 

 FAX (415) 285-5066 

ALAN L. SCHLOSSER, SBN 49957 

JULIA HARUMI MASS SBN 189649 

MARK SCHLOSBERG, SBN 209144 

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 

FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA, 1663 Mission Street, Suite 460 

San Francisco, CA 94103 

Telephone: (415) 621-2493 

 FAX (415) 255-8437 

Counsel for Plaintiffs Local 10 Longshore and Warehouse Union et al.

C03-2962 THE (JL) 

John A. Russo Esq. State Bar No. 129729 

City Attorney 

Randolph W. Hall, Esq. State Bar No. 080142 

Chief Asst. City Attorney 

Office of the City Attorney 

One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor 

Oakland CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 238-3601 

 FAX (510) 238-6500

Counsel for defendant CITY OF OAKLAND et al 

Case 3:03-cv-02962-TEH Document 158 Filed 07/15/05 Page 2 of 5
3

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE RE INDIVIDUAL OFFICER DEFENDANTS AS TO 

PLAINTIFF ARTHUR MARTINEZ ONLY - Case Nos. C-03-2962 TEH (JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, Plaintiff ARTHUR MARTINEZ, 

and the Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND, RICHARD WORD, PATRICK HAW, ROD YEE, E. 

POULSON, HOWARD A. JORDAN, DAVE KOZICKI, T. HOGENMILLER, E. TRACEY, R. 

GUTIEREZ, A. OERLEAMNS, R. HOLMGREN, P. GONZALES, S. KNIGHT, M. RANDALL, R. 

CHAN, R. OROZCO, G. BELLUSA, P. HUPPERT, J. SCOTT, J. KURZROCK, M. MACK, J. 

KELLY, OFFICER, SOUZA, J. MUSCHI, S. JOHNSON, OFFICER KARSABOOM, SGT. G. 

TOLLESON, SGT. D. CAMPBELL, OFF. R. MOORE, OFF. A. STEINBERGER, OFF. F. UU, 

OFF. B. WORDEN, OFF. J. FUKADA, OFF. J. DOOLITTLE, OFF. C. SAUNDERS, OFF. E. 

ROMANS and OFF. C. DELROSARIO, through their designated counsel that the above-captioned 

action entitled Local 10, International Longshore and Warehouse Union, et al., vs. City of Oakland, et 

al, and numbered C 03-2962 TEH (JL), be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 

41(a)(1), as to all of the claims of plaintiff ARTHUR MARTINEZ ONLY, against the individual 

officer defendants ONLY, whose names are listed as follows: 

 RICHARD WORD, PATRICK HAW, ROD YEE, E. POULSON, HOWARD A. JORDAN, 

DAVE KOZICKI, T. HOGENMILLER, E. TRACEY, R. GUTIEREZ, A. OERLEAMNS, R. 

HOLMGREN, P. GONZALES, S. KNIGHT, M. RANDALL, R. CHAN, R. OROZCO, G. 

BELLUSA, P. HUPPERT, J. SCOTT, J. KURZROCK, M. MACK, J. KELLY, OFFICER, SOUZA, 

J. MUSCHI, S. JOHNSON, OFFICER KARSABOOM, SGT. G. TOLLESON, SGT. D. 

CAMPBELL, OFF. R. MOORE, OFF. A. STEINBERGER, OFF. F. UU, OFF. B. WORDEN, OFF. 

J. FUKADA, OFF. J. DOOLITTLE, OFF. C. SAUNDERS, OFF. E. ROMANS and OFF. C. 

DELROSARIO.

 It is acknowledged that ARTHUR MARTINEZ’ claims against the CITY OF OAKLAND are 

to be resolved pursuant to his acceptance of the CITY OF OAKLAND’s offer of judgment pursuant 

to FRCP Rule 68 and offer of compromise pursuant to California CCP § 998 dated June 21, 2005. 

This dismissal with prejudice of the individual officer defendants is a condition of that offer of 

judgment and offer to compromise. 

Case 3:03-cv-02962-TEH Document 158 Filed 07/15/05 Page 3 of 5
4

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE RE INDIVIDUAL OFFICER DEFENDANTS AS TO 

PLAINTIFF ARTHUR MARTINEZ ONLY - Case Nos. C-03-2962 TEH (JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: July 10, 2005 

/s/ 

JAMES B. CHANIN 

Attorney for Plaintiffs in Local 10, et al. 

Dated: July13, 2005 /s/ 

GREGORY M. FOX 

Attorney for Defendants City of Oakland et al. 

ORDER

 Having reviewed the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore 

 THIS COURT ORDERS THAT, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and the CITY OF 

OAKLAND’s offer of judgment pursuant to FRCP Rule 68 and offer of compromise pursuant to 

California CCP § 998 dated February 17, 2005, and plaintiff ARTHUR MARTINEZ’ acceptance 

thereof, Plaintiff ARTHUR MARTINEZ’ action No. C –03-2962 THE (JL) shall be and hereby is 

dismissed with prejudice as against the following defendants ONLY: RICHARD WORD, PATRICK 

HAW, ROD YEE, E. POULSON, HOWARD A. JORDAN, DAVE KOZICKI, T. HOGENMILLER, 

E. TRACEY, R. GUTIEREZ, A. OERLEAMNS, R. HOLMGREN, P. GONZALES, S. KNIGHT, M. 

RANDALL, R. CHAN, R. OROZCO, G. BELLUSA, P. HUPPERT, J. SCOTT, J. KURZROCK, M. 

MACK, J. KELLY, OFFICER, SOUZA, J. MUSCHI, S. JOHNSON, OFFICER KARSABOOM, 

SGT. G. TOLLESON, SGT. D. CAMPBELL, OFF. R. MOORE, OFF. A. STEINBERGER, OFF. F. 

UU, OFF. B. WORDEN, OFF. J. FUKADA, OFF. J. DOOLITTLE, OFF. C. SAUNDERS, OFF. E. 

ROMANS and OFF. C. DELROSARIO. 

BY STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________ ______________________________________ 

DATE THELTON E. HENDERSON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:03-cv-02962-TEH Document 158 Filed 07/15/05 Page 4 of 5
5

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE RE INDIVIDUAL OFFICER DEFENDANTS AS TO 

PLAINTIFF ARTHUR MARTINEZ ONLY - Case Nos. C-03-2962 TEH (JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this E-filed document. Dated: July 13, 2005. 

 By:_______/s/_____________________ 

 Gregory M. Fox 

Case 3:03-cv-02962-TEH Document 158 Filed 07/15/05 Page 5 of 5