Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04372/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04372-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

WILLIAM S. LERACH (68581) 

DARREN J. ROBBINS (168593) 

TRAVIS E. DOWNS III (148274) 

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: 619/231-1058 

619/231-7423 (fax) 

billl@lerachlaw.com 

darrenr@lerachlaw.com 

travisd@lerachlaw.com 

– and – 

SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113) 

MARIA V. MORRIS (223903) 

MONIQUE C. WINKLER (213031) 

100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415/288-4545 

415/288-4534 (fax) 

swilliams@lerachlaw.com 

mmorris@lerachlaw.com 

mwinkler@lerachlaw.com 

[Proposed] Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

[Additional counsel appear on signature page.] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ALASKA HOTEL & RESTAURANT 

EMPLOYEES PENSION TRUST FUND, 

Derivatively on Behalf of MARVELL 

TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SEHAT SUTARDJA, et al., 

Defendants, 

– and – 

MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD., a 

Bermuda corporation, 

Nominal Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. C-06-03894-RMW(RS) 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL 

PURPOSES, APPOINTING LEAD 

PLAINTIFF, AND SETTING SCHEDULE 

FOR FILING OF CONSOLIDATED 

COMPLAINT AND RESPONSES THERETO

[Caption continued on following page.] 

Case 5:06-cv-04372-RMW Document 3 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 10
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

YEN SHEI, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal 

Defendant Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SEHAT SUTARDJA, et al. 

Defendants, 

– and – 

MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., 

a Bermuda corporation, 

Nominal Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C-06-04372-MHP 

Case 5:06-cv-04372-RMW Document 3 Filed 08/17/06 Page 2 of 10
STIP AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES 

FOR ALL PURPOSES, ETC. – C-06-03894-RMW(RS) - 1 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, there are two related shareholder derivative actions on behalf of nominal 

defendant Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (“Marvell”) pending before this Court: 

Abbreviated Case Name Case Number Date Filed 

Alaska Hotel & Restaurant Employees 

Pension Trust Fund v. Sutardja, et al. 

C-06-03894-RMW(RS) 06/22/06 

Shei v. Sutardja, et al. C-06-04372-MHP 07/17/06 

WHEREAS, the two related Marvell shareholder derivative actions arise out of the same 

transactions and occurrences and involve the same or substantially similar issues of law and fact, 

and, therefore, should be consolidated for all purposes under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a); 

WHEREAS, defendants take no position as to the appointment of the Alaska Hotel & 

Restaurant Employees Pension Trust Fund as Lead Plaintiff and Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller 

Rudman & Robbins LLP and Scott + Scott, LLC as Lead Counsel; and 

WHEREAS, plaintiffs and defendants, after meeting and conferring, agree that judicial 

economy will be served by setting a schedule for defendants’ response to the complaint. 

THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by plaintiffs and defendants, through 

their respective counsel of record, as follows: 

I. CONSOLIDATION OF ACTIONS 

1. The following actions are hereby consolidated for all purposes, including pretrial 

proceedings, trial and appeal: 

Abbreviated Case Name Case Number Date Filed 

Alaska Hotel & Restaurant Employees 

Pension Trust Fund v. Sutardja, et al. 

C-06-03894-RMW(RS) 06/22/06 

Shei v. Sutardja, et al. C-06-04372-MHP 07/17/06 

2. The caption of these consolidated actions shall be “In re Marvell Technology Group 

Ltd. Derivative Litigation” and the files of these consolidated actions shall be maintained in one file 

under Master File No. C-06-03894-RMW(RS). Any other actions now pending or later filed in this 

Court which arise out of or are related to the same facts as alleged in the above-identified cases shall 

be consolidated for all purposes, if and when they are brought to the Court’s attention. 

Case 5:06-cv-04372-RMW Document 3 Filed 08/17/06 Page 3 of 10
STIP AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES 

FOR ALL PURPOSES, ETC. – C-06-03894-RMW(RS) - 2 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3. Every pleading filed in the consolidated actions, or in any separate action included 

herein, shall bear the following caption: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP 

LTD. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Master File No. C-06-03894-RMW(RS) 

4. When a pleading is intended to be applicable to all actions governed by this Order, 

the words “All Actions” shall appear immediately after the words “This Document Relates To:” in the 

caption set out above. When a pleading is intended to be applicable to only some, but not all, of the 

consolidated actions, this Court’s docket number for each individual action to which the pleading is 

intended to be applicable and the abbreviated case name of said action shall appear immediately after 

the words “This Document Relates To:” in the caption described above (e.g., “No. C-06-03894-

RMW(RS), Alaska Hotel & Restaurant Employees Pension Trust Fund v. Sutardja, et al.”). 

5. A Master Docket and a Master File hereby are established for the above consolidated 

proceedings and for all other related cases filed in or transferred to this Court. Separate dockets shall 

continue to be maintained for each of the individual actions hereby consolidated, and entries shall be 

made in the docket of each individual case in accordance with the regular procedures of the clerk of 

this Court, except as modified by this Order. 

6. When a pleading is filed and the caption shows that it is applicable to “All Actions,” the 

clerk shall file such pleading in the Master File and note such filing on the Master Docket. No 

further copies need be filed, and no other docket entries need be made. 

7. When a pleading is filed and the caption shows that it is to be applicable to fewer than 

all of the consolidated actions, the clerk will file such pleading in the Master File only but shall 

docket such filing on the Master Docket and the docket of each applicable action. 

Case 5:06-cv-04372-RMW Document 3 Filed 08/17/06 Page 4 of 10
STIP AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES 

FOR ALL PURPOSES, ETC. – C-06-03894-RMW(RS) - 3 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

8. When a case which properly belongs as part of In re Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 

Derivative Litigation is filed in this Court or transferred to this Court from another court and 

assigned to this Court, the clerk of this Court shall: 

(a) Place a copy of this Order in the separate file for such action; 

(b) Mail to the attorneys for the plaintiff(s) in the newly-filed or transferred case a 

copy of this Order and direct that this Order be served upon or mailed to any new defendant(s) or 

their counsel in the newly-filed or transferred case; and 

(c) Make an appropriate entry on the Master Docket. This Court requests the 

assistance of counsel in calling to the attention of the clerk of this Court the filing or transfer of any 

case which properly might be consolidated as part of In re Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 

Derivative Litigation. 

II. APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND CO-LEAD COUNSEL 

9. The Alaska Hotel & Restaurant Employees Pension Trust Fund shall be appointed 

Lead Plaintiff. 

10. The law firm of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP and Scott + 

Scott, LLC shall be appointed Lead Counsel for plaintiffs in the consolidated Marvell shareholder 

derivative actions.1

11. Lead Counsel shall have authority to speak for plaintiffs in matters regarding pretrial 

and trial procedure and settlement negotiations, and shall make all work assignments in such manner 

as to facilitate the orderly and efficient prosecution of this litigation and to avoid duplicative or 

unproductive effort. 

12. Lead Counsel shall be responsible for coordination of all activities and appearances 

on behalf of plaintiffs and for the dissemination of notices and orders of this Court. No motion, 

 

1

 Defendants take no position as to the appointment of the Alaska Hotel & Restaurant 

Employees Pension Trust Fund as Lead Plaintiff and Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & 

Robbins LLP and Scott + Scott, LLC as Lead Counsel. 

Case 5:06-cv-04372-RMW Document 3 Filed 08/17/06 Page 5 of 10
STIP AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES 

FOR ALL PURPOSES, ETC. – C-06-03894-RMW(RS) - 4 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

request for discovery or other pretrial proceedings shall be initiated or filed by plaintiffs except 

through Lead Counsel. 

13. Lead Counsel also shall be available and responsible for communications to and from 

this Court. Lead Counsel shall be responsible for the creation and maintenance of a master service 

list of all parties and their respective counsel. 

14. Defendants’ counsel may rely upon all agreements made with Lead Counsel, or other 

duly authorized representatives of plaintiffs, and such agreements shall be binding on plaintiffs. 

III. SCHEDULE 

15. Plaintiffs shall no later than 75 days from the entry of this Order file and serve a 

Consolidated Complaint which will supersede all existing complaints filed in these actions. 

Defendants need not respond to any of the pre-existing complaints. Service shall be effected with 

respect to any defendant named in any of the consolidated actions by serving the Consolidated 

Complaint on that defendant or, with permission, that defendant’s counsel. 

16. Each defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Consolidated Complaint no 

later than 75 days from the date of service. In the event that defendants file and serve any motion 

directed at the Consolidated Complaint, plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition within 60 days 

after the service of defendants’ motion. If defendants file and serve a reply to plaintiffs’ opposition, 

they will do so within 30 days after service of the opposition. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: August 4, 2006 LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

TRAVIS E. DOWNS III 

BENNY C. GOODMAN III 

THOMAS G. WILHELM 

s/ Travis E. Downs III 

TRAVIS E. DOWNS III 

Case 5:06-cv-04372-RMW Document 3 Filed 08/17/06 Page 6 of 10
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES 

FOR ALL PURPOSES, ETC. – C-06-03894-RMW(RS) - 5 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: 619/231-1058 

619/231-7423 (fax) 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

SHAWN A. WILLIAMS 

MARIA V. MORRIS 

MONIQUE C. WINKLER 

100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415/288-4545 

415/288-4534 (fax) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Alaska Hotel & Restaurant 

Employees Pension Trust Fund 

 I, Travis E. Downs III, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that Arthur L. Shingler III has concurred in this filing. 

DATED: August 4, 2006 SCOTT + SCOTT, LLC 

ARTHUR L. SHINGLER III 

s/ Arthur L. Shingler III 

ARTHUR L. SHINGLER III 

600 B Street, Suite 1500 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: 619/233-4565 

619/233-0508 (fax) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Yen Shei 

 I, Travis E. Downs III, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that Walter J. Robinson has concurred in this filing. 

DATED: August 4, 2006 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW 

 PITTMAN LLP 

WALTER J. ROBINSON 

s/ Walter J. Robinson 

WALTER J. ROBINSON 

Case 5:06-cv-04372-RMW Document 3 Filed 08/17/06 Page 7 of 10
STIP AND [] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES 

FOR ALL PURPOSES, ETC. – C-06-03894-RMW(RS) - 6 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1114 

Telephone: 650/233-4500 

650/233-4545 (fax) 

wrobinson@pillsburylaw.com 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW 

 PITTMAN LLP 

BRUCE A. ERICSON 

50 Fremont Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-7880 

Telephone: 415/983-1000 

415/983-1200 (fax) 

bruce.ericson@pillsburylaw.com 

Counsel (limited and special appearance) for 

Nominal Defendant Marvell Technology Group 

Ltd. 

* * * 

O R D E R 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _________________________ 

THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

S:\CasesSD\Marvell Derivative\STP00032700-LP-2.doc 

Case 5:06-cv-04372-RMW Document 3 Filed 08/17/06 Page 8 of 10
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, the undersigned, declare: 

1. That declarant is and was, at all times herein mentioned, a citizen of the United States 

and a resident of the County of San Diego, over the age of 18 years, and not a party to or interested 

party in the within action; that declarant’s business address is 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San 

Diego, California 92101. 

2. That on August 4, 2006, declarant served the by depositing a true copy thereof in a 

United States mailbox at San Diego, California in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully 

prepaid and addressed to the parties listed on the attached Service List. 

3. That there is a regular communication by mail between the place of mailing and the 

places so addressed. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 4th 

day of August, 2006, at San Diego, California. 

s/ Alison K. Sloan 

ALISON K. SLOAN 

Case 5:06-cv-04372-RMW Document 3 Filed 08/17/06 Page 9 of 10
MARVELL DERIVATIVE

Service List - 8/4/2006

Page 1 of 1

(06-0142)

Counsel For Defendant(s) 

Walter J. Robinson

2475 Hanover Street

Palo Alto, CA 94304

650/233-4500

650/233-4545(Fax)

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Bruce A. Ericson

50 Fremont Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-2228

415/983-1000

415/983-1200(Fax)

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Counsel For Plaintiff(s) 

Travis E. Downs III

Benny C. Goodman III

Thomas G. Wilhelm

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900

San Diego, CA 92101

619/231-1058

619/231-7423(Fax)

Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & 

Robbins LLP

Shawn A. Williams

Maria V. Morris

Monique C. Winkler

100 Pine Street, Suite 2600

San Francisco, CA 94111-5238

415/288-4545

415/288-4534(Fax)

Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & 

Robbins LLP

Arthur L. Shingler III

600 B Street, Suite 1500

San Diego, CA 92101

619/233-4565

619/233-0508(Fax)

Scott + Scott, LLC

Case 5:06-cv-04372-RMW Document 3 Filed 08/17/06 Page 10 of 10