Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-00408/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-00408-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kent Dyer, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

Jason Napier, et al., 

Defendants. _________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 04-0408-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. (Dkt. 88.) 

Defendants request an award of $135,303.43 in attorneys’ fees and non-taxable costs

pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505, which permits a court to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and

costs to a prevailing party in a copyright action. Because the Court granted summary judgment

in favor of Defendants on the issue of liability for copyright (Dkt. 85), among other reasons,

Defendants argue they are entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and non-taxable

costs. (Dkt. 97.) 

On October 23, 2006, after Defendants moved for attorneys’ fees, Plaintiffs appealed this

Court’s Order granting summary judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth

Circuit. (Dkt. 89.) On January 16, 2007, the Ninth Circuit Mediator issued an order staying

the matter pending before her until this Court renders a decision on Defendants’ Motion for

Attorneys Fees. (Dkt. 107.) 

In light of Plaintiffs’ appeal, the Court finds that it would be imprudent to resolve

Defendants’ pending motion pertaining to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and related

Case 2:04-cv-00408-SMM Document 108 Filed 03/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

non-taxable costs. Consequently, the Court will deny Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees

(dkt. 88) without prejudice and with leave to re-file upon the Ninth Circuit’s resolution of

Plaintiffs’ pending appeal. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants’

Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (dkt. 88). Defendants may re-file their Motion for Attorneys’ Fees

upon resolution of Plaintiffs’ appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth

Circuit.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon receipt of this Order, Plaintiffs’ counsel shall

contact the Ninth Circuit Mediator. See Dkt. 107.

DATED this 28th day of March, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-00408-SMM Document 108 Filed 03/28/07 Page 2 of 2