Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00024/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00024-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Estate of MARK ANTHONY SCOTT,

deceased, by and through MARY

SCOTT, TINA SCOTT, REGINA 

ALLEN, and KIM NZIBO as 

Successors in Interest; MARY 

SCOTT, individually; TINA 

SCOTT, individually; REGINA 

ALLEN, individually; and KIM 

NZIBO, individually,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; 

Sacramento County Sheriff’s 

Department Sheriff SCOTT 

JONES; Sacramento County Main 

Jail Commander Captain 

ROSEANNE RICHAEL; Sacramento 

County Sheriff’s Department 

Chief of Correctional and 

Court Services JAMIE LEWIS;

Sacramento County Main Jail

Chief of Correctional Health

Services AARON BREWER; 

Sacramento County Jail 

Systems Medical Director 

ROBERT PADILLA, MD; 

Sacramento County Main Jail

Director of Nursing with

Correctional Health Services 

PAM HARRIS; Sacramento County 

Main Jail Watch Commander, 

Lieutenant GEORGE McKEEL 

(#11); Sacramento County 

Sheriff’s Department Deputy 

JAMES TIDWELL (#897);

Sacramento County Sheriff’s

Deputy DAVID PANTOJA (#2615);

Sacramento County Sheriff’s

Department Deputy KEN BECKER

No. 2:13-cv-0024-GEB-KJN 

ORDER

Case 2:13-cv-00024-GEB-KJN Document 33 Filed 03/21/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

(#931); Sacramento County

Sheriff’s Department Deputy

MICHAEL MATRANGA (#572);

Sacramento County Sheriff’s

Department Sergeant MICHAEL,

XIONG (#71); Sacramento 

County Sheriff’s Department 

Sergeant SCOTT HUFFORD (#41);

and CARYL SKERRITT, RN,

Defendants

*.

On March 13, 2014, the parties filed a joint “Request 

for Settlement Conference in Trial Court,” (ECF No. 32), in which 

they request a settlement conference be scheduled with the trial 

judge.

I decline to act as a settlement conference judge in 

this action. However, should the parties desire to schedule a 

settlement conference before a magistrate judge, they are hereby 

authorized to contact the Courtroom Deputy assigned to the 

magistrate judge of their choice for the purpose of attempting to 

schedule a mutually convenient date and time to conduct a 

settlement conference. 

Dated: March 20, 2014 

 

 

* The caption has been amended according to the automatic dismissal of Doe 

Defendants. See Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order 2:16-22, ECF No. 24.

Case 2:13-cv-00024-GEB-KJN Document 33 Filed 03/21/14 Page 2 of 2