Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05078/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05078-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN MILWITT,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN ASHCROFT, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 07-5078 CW

ORDER DISMISSING

CASE FOR FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE

On June 18, 2008, the Court issued a Clerk’s notice taking

under submission on the papers Defendants County of Alameda and

Charles Plummer’s motion to dismiss. The Court instructed

Plaintiff that his opposition to the motion would be due July

3, 2008. Plaintiff was warned that failure timely to file an

opposition might result in dismissal of the case for failure to

prosecute. Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the motion. 

On June 23, 2008, Federal Defendants John Ashcroft and Albert

Gonzales filed a motion to dismiss. On July 9, 2008, the Court

issued an order taking the Federal Defendants’ motion under

submission on the papers. In that order, the Court advised

Plaintiff that his opposition to the Federal Defendants’ motion to

dismiss would be due by July 17, 2008. In addition, the Court

Case 4:07-cv-05078-CW Document 27 Filed 08/01/08 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

allowed Plaintiff until July 17, 2008 to file an opposition to

Alameda County and Charles Plummer’s earlier motion to dismiss. 

However, the Court warned Plaintiff that if he failed to file an

opposition by July 17, 2008, his case would be dismissed for

failure to prosecute. 

Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to either motion to

dismiss or otherwise contacted the Court. Accordingly, and good

cause appearing therefor, the Court dismisses the case without

prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall enter judgment

and close the file.

Dated: 8/1/08 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:07-cv-05078-CW Document 27 Filed 08/01/08 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MILWITT et al,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ASHCROFT et al,

Defendant. /

Case Number: CV07-05078 CW 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court,

Northern District of California.

That on August 1, 2008, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said

copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said

envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located

in the Clerk's office.

John Milwitt

1164 Solano Avenue

#122

Albany, CA 94706

Neill Tai Tseng

United States Attorney’s Office

450 Golden Gate Avenue

9th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102

Rebecca S. Widen

Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP

1939 Harrison Street, Suite 800

Oakland, CA 94612

Dated: August 1, 2008

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Sheilah Cahill, Deputy Clerk

Case 4:07-cv-05078-CW Document 27 Filed 08/01/08 Page 3 of 3