Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00577/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00577-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE

25861187v.1

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Kathryn C. Palamountain (Cal. Bar No. 183246)

cpalamountain@seyfarth.com

700 Milam Street, Suite 1400

Houston, Texas 77002-2812

Telephone: (713) 225-2300

Facsimile: (713) 225-2340

Attorneys for Defendant

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONNIE-MARIE WILSON,

Plaintiff

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Defendant.

CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-00577-JCS

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND

RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE

This Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiff RONNIE-MARIE WILSON

(“Plaintiff”), and Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION (“JPMorgan”) (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their

respective counsel of record, with reference to the following facts:

1. Plaintiff filed his Complaint against Defendant on February 3, 2016.

2. Defendant waived service on February 12, 2016.

3. The responsive pleading is currently due April 12, 2016.

4. The allegations of the Complaint involve conditions at a JPMorgan branch.

Case 3:16-cv-00577-VC Document 13 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 3
2

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE

25861187v.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5. Parties are exploring the possibility of an early resolution of this

matter and believe that settlement may be possible without the need for Defendant to file

a responsive pleading.

6. The parties have stipulated to a three-week extension of the

responsive deadline, making the proposed deadline for JPMorgan to file a responsive

pleading May 3, 2016.

7. The Parties have not previously requested a time extension in this case

for any reason, and the stipulated extension will not interfere with other deadlines.

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and jointly request that the Court extend

the responsive pleading deadline from April 12, 2016 to May 3, 2016.

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: April 1, 2016

Respectfully submitted,

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

By: /s/ Tanya E. Moore (by permission)

Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RONNIE-MARIE WILSON

Respectfully submitted,

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: /s/ Kathryn C. Palamountain

Kathryn C. Palamountain

Attorneys for Defendant

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

Dated: 4/1/16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:16-cv-00577-VC Document 13 Filed 04/01/16 Page 2 of 3
3

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE

25861187v.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that all signatories listed above, on whose behalf this stipulation is

submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.

Dated: April 1, 2016 By:/s/ Kathryn C. Palamountain

Kathryn C. Palamountain

Attorneys for Defendant

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, do hereby certify that I have caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing

document to be served upon the following by filing the same with the Court’s CM/ECF

electronic filing system on this 1st day of April 2016:

Tanya E. Moore

Moore Law Firm, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

service@moorelawfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/ Kathryn C. Palamountain

Kathryn C. Palamountain

Case 3:16-cv-00577-VC Document 13 Filed 04/01/16 Page 3 of 3