Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05601/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05601-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOUGHT, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ORACLE CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 12-cv-05601-WHO (MEJ)

DISCOVERY ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 185

Plaintiff Thought, Inc. moves for an order compelling Defendant Oracle response to its 

Requests for Production seeking financial information regarding all Oracle products from October 

2006 to the present that were combined and distributed with the accused TopLink or EclipseLink 

products. Jt. Ltr., Dkt. No. 185. However, discovery in this case closed on October 7, 2015. Dkt. 

No. 166. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-3, “no motions to compel discovery may be filed more 

than 7 days after the discovery cut-off.” Accordingly, the undersigned magistrate judge is without 

jurisdiction to consider Thought’s request.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 27, 2015

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:12-cv-05601-WHO Document 187 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 1