Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03272/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03272-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARLENE THOMPSON and DONNA JEREZ,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

GENENTECH, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C-04-3272 MJJ 

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER

On May 5, 2005, the parties filed a Stipulated Protective Order. The Court orders the parties to

submit a revised proposed protective order complying with the requirements set forth below:

1) Provide detailed instructions for filing confidential materials under seal. In addition to

placing documents in a sealed envelope with instructions that the document is filed pursuant

to the Stipulated Protective Order and that the envelope is not to be opened absent further

order of the Court , the envelope should be labeled to identify the title of the case, the case

number, and the title of the document.

2) Attach a Non-Disclosure Agreement, and reference that agreement in the protective order,

to be read and signed by anyone to whom confidential material is disclosed. The NDA

should include an acknowledgment that the protective order has been read, that the party

has agreed to be bound by its terms, and that the party agrees to submit to the jurisdiction

of this court if any dispute arises over the use of the information.

Case 3:04-cv-03272-MJJ Document 28 Filed 05/06/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3) Designate a time limit on the Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the order 

(e.g., six months after final termination of the action).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 6, 2005 /s/ 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-03272-MJJ Document 28 Filed 05/06/05 Page 2 of 2