Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04697/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04697-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: Dismissal - Case No. 4:09-CV-04697-CW (EDL) 

KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN (SBN 202634)

karineh.khachatourian@klgates.com 

BRYAN J. SINCLAIR (SBN 205885) 

bryan.sinclair@klgates.com 

MICHAEL R. HAVEN (SBN 208721) 

mike.haven@klgates.com 

K&L GATES LLP 

630 Hansen Way 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: 650.798.6700 

Facsimile: 650.798.6701 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., a 

Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DEVICEVM, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

and BENEDICT CHONG, an individual, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 4:09-CV-04697-CW (EDL)

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 

DISMISSAL 

Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken 

Room: 2, 4th Floor 

Complaint Filed: July 17, 2009 

Trial Date: September 19, 2011 

DEVICEVM, a Delaware corporation,,

 Counter-Claimant, 

vs. 

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD., a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Counter-Defendant. 

Case 4:09-cv-04697-CW Document 116 Filed 05/27/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: Dismissal - Case No. 4:09-CV-04697-CW (EDL) 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties hereby stipulate to 

the dismissal of this action, including all claims and counterclaims, with prejudice in its entirety with 

each party bearing its own costs and fees. 

K&L GATES LLP 

Dated: May 27, 2010 By: /s/ 

Karineh Khachatourian 

Attorneys for Phoenix Technologies Ltd.

O’Melveny & Myers LLP 

Dated: May 27, 2010 By: /s/

David Enzminger

Attorneys for DeviceVM, Inc. 

ORDER 

Upon the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 27, 2010 By: 

Honorable Claudia Wilken 

United States District Court Judge 

 

Case 4:09-cv-04697-CW Document 116 Filed 05/27/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: Dismissal - Case No. 4:09-CV-04697-CW (EDL) 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

 Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence 

in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support this 

concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request. 

Dated: May 27, 2010 By: /s/ 

Karineh Khachatourian 

Attorneys for Phoenix Technologies Ltd.

Case 4:09-cv-04697-CW Document 116 Filed 05/27/10 Page 3 of 3