Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01989/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01989-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMANDO G. SANDERS, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1989 GEB GGH P

vs.

M. YORK, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On March 2, 2007, the court ordered defendant Rubio to show cause why default

should not be entered. On March 30, 2007, defendant filed a response to the show cause order. 

Although it is curious that CDCR makes legal representation decisions, i.e., who may be

represented by the Attorney General, in lieu of the Attorney-General making the determination of

who is entitled to legal representation under the laws of the State of California, apparently that is

the case. Given that state of affairs, and based on the submission of the Attorney General

demonstrating CDCR’s confusion of Rubio’s employee status, defendant Rubio’s failure to file a

timely answer is understandable. On April 3, 2007, defendant filed an answer.

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:05-cv-01989-GEB-GGH Document 91 Filed 04/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The order to show cause is discharged;

2. Plaintiff’s January 19, 2007, request for default is denied.

DATED: 4/18/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

san1989.vac

Case 2:05-cv-01989-GEB-GGH Document 91 Filed 04/18/07 Page 2 of 2