Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04035/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04035-52/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ROE, et al.,

Plaintiffs

 v.

THOMAS WHITE, 

Defendant. /

No. C 03-04035 CRB

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

The motion of plaintiffs’ counsel, David Replogle, for reconsideration of the Court’s

order directing all counsel to produce records of their costs and disbursements for which they

claim they are entitled to reimbursement is DENIED. As the Court ordered at oral argument

on December 18, 2007, any counsel who contends that he has incurred costs for any plaintiffs

or made advances, loans or other disbursements to any plaintiffs for which counsel is entitled

to reimbursement from the settlement fund and/or plaintiffs shall submit to the Court on or

before December 31, 2007 a declaration detailing those costs and advances, loans or other

disbursements. Counsel shall include with their detailed declarations all receipts and other

documentation supporting said costs and disbursements, as well as any agreements with 

//

//

//

Case 3:03-cv-04035-CRB Document 722 Filed 12/21/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

plaintiffs concerning any loans, advances or disbursements.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 21, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-04035-CRB Document 722 Filed 12/21/07 Page 2 of 2