Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06079/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06079-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIE WEAVER,

Plaintiff, CV F 04 6079 OWW WMW P

vs. FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION 

 RE MOTIONS (DOCS 18, 27, 30)

A. BRADISH, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Pending before the court are

Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the California

Department of Corrections at Pelican Bay State Prison, seeks injunctive relief against

correctional officials employed by the Department of Corrections at CCI Tehachapi. The

conduct at issue concerns activity at CCI Tehachapi.

When an inmate seeks injunctive or declaratory relief concerning the prison where

he is incarcerated, his claims for such relief become moot when he is no longer subjected to those

conditions. See Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147 (1975); Enrico's, Inc. v. Rice, 730 F.2d

1250, 1255 (9th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, plaintiff's request[s] should be denied as moot.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s motions for 

injunctive relief be denied.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Case 1:04-cv-06079-LJO -WMW Document 34 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9 Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the th

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

j14hj0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06079-LJO -WMW Document 34 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 2