Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00133/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00133-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE—No. C-08-00133 RMW

MAG

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 4/30/08

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HOLOGIC, INC.; CYTYC CORPORATION;

and HOLOGIC LP,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SENORX, INC.,

Defendant.

No. C-08-00133 RMW

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

In the court's April 25, 2008 order denying plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, the

parties were ordered to contact the court's Courtroom Deputy to set a trial date 60-90 days from the

date of the order. SenoRx's counsel has contacted the court, stating that the parties have questions

about how the court would like to proceed with the trial with respect to scheduling claim

construction, disclosures under the Northern District of California Patent Local Rules, etc. The

parties seek a conference with the court, but have not identified any particular areas of disagreement.

The court ordered the parties to proceed on an expedited schedule based on their

representations at the hearing that both were ready to proceed to trial in 60-90 days. Accordingly,

the court expects the parties to meet and confer to discuss how each side anticipates proceeding on

an expedited basis under the Patent Local Rules and to agree where they can about the procedures

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW Document 114 Filed 04/30/08 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE—No. C-08-00133 RMW

MAG 2

going forward. See N.D. Cal. Patent L.R. 2-1(a). The court will set a case management conference

in this matter for Friday, May 9, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. to discuss particular areas of disagreement that

the parties identify. The parties shall file a joint case management conference statement on or before

Friday May, 2, 2008 setting forth their proposed schedule and any specific case management issues

requiring the court's guidance. The parties may ask to appear telephonically by filing an appropriate

request with the court's Courtroom Deputy.

DATED: 4/30/08

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW Document 114 Filed 04/30/08 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE—No. C-08-00133 RMW

MAG 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiffs:

Katharine Lyn Altemus altemusk@howrey.com

Robert F. Ruyak ruyakr@howrey.com

Henry C. Su suh@howrey.com

Matthew M. Wolf wolfm@howrey.com

Counsel for Defendant:

F.T. Alexandra Mahaney amahaney@wsgr.com

Natalie Morgan nmorgan@wsgr.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 4/30/08 /s/ MAG

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW Document 114 Filed 04/30/08 Page 3 of 3