Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-05590/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-05590-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PROTECTIVE ORDER: 

CASE NO. CV-08-5590 (JF) 

(Counsel Listed on Signature Page) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MEDIMMUNE, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

PDL BIOPHARMA, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. CV 08 5590 JF 

Action Filed: December 16, 2008 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER MODIFYING PROTECTIVE 

ORDER 

Honorable Howard R. Lloyd 

*E-FILED 07-08-2010* XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX

Case 5:08-cv-05590-JF Document 624 Filed 07/08/10 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PROTECTIVE ORDER: 

CASE NO. CV-08-5590 (JF) 

A. Whereas Defendant PDL BioPharma, Inc. (“PDL”) has served certain requests for 

production upon MedImmune, LLC (“MedImmune”) that call for the production of documents 

containing information covered by confidentiality agreements between MedImmune and certain 

third parties; 

B. Whereas MedImmune has provided notice of the requests and a copy of the 

Protective Order (Docket No. 113) to the certain third parties; 

C. Whereas certain third parties have objected to the production of documents 

pursuant to the current version of the Protective Order because the Protective Order permits 

employees within PDL to review even documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL —

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” see Section 7.3; 

D. Whereas the Court has the authority to modify the protective order as requested, see 

Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1365, 1370-71 (9th Cir. 1992); and 

E. Whereas, in the interest of minimizing third-party motions practice, MedImmune 

and PDL have agreed to accommodate the requests of the certain third parties; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between MedImmune and PDL as 

follows: 

1. Section 2 of the Protective Order (Docket No. 113) is modified to add the following 

Section 2.4.1. 

“THIRD-PARTY CONFIDENTIAL—OUTSIDE COUNSEL’S EYES ONLY” Information or 

Items: extremely sensitive “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” information, the potential production of 

which has caused a third party to object to the disclosure of the information to another Party. 

2. Sections 2.7, 2.8, 5.2(a), 5.2(b), 5.2(c), 5.3, 6.3, 8, and 12.4 are amended to add the 

phrase “or THIRD-PARTY CONFIDENTIAL—OUTSIDE COUNSEL’S EYES 

ONLY” after the phrase “‛CONFIDENTIAL’ or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.’” 

3. Section 7 of the Protective Order is modified to add the following Section 7.6. 

Disclosure of “THIRD-PARTY CONFIDENTIAL—OUTSIDE COUNSEL’S EYES ONLY” 

XXXXXXXXX

Case 5:08-cv-05590-JF Document 624 Filed 07/08/10 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PROTECTIVE ORDER: 

CASE NO. CV-08-5590 (JF) 

Information of Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the 

Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose the information or item designated “THIRDPARTY CONFIDENTIAL—OUTSIDE COUNSEL’S EYES ONLY” only to: 

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel; 

(b) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this 

litigation, and (2) who have been subject to section 7.4 above and who have signed the 

“Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

(c) the Court and its personnel; 

(d) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably 

necessary for this litigation; and 

(e) witnesses, to the extent provided in section 7.5. 

4. Section 7.5 of the Protective Order (Docket No. 113) is amended to replace the 

final sentence with the following: 

Protected Material may be disclosed to third-party fact witnesses during the course of a deposition 

only if the deponent is reasonably believed to be already familiar with such Protected Material, 

except that material designated “THIRD-PARTY CONFIDENTIAL—OUTSIDE COUNSEL’S 

EYES ONLY” may not be shown to third-party fact witnesses. To illustrate, a document 

produced by MedImmune and designated “THIRD-PARTY CONFIDENTIAL—OUTSIDE 

COUNSEL’S EYES ONLY” may not be shown to a fact witness currently employed by PDL 

during that witness’ deposition. 

XXXXXXXXX

Case 5:08-cv-05590-JF Document 624 Filed 07/08/10 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 3. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PROTECTIVE ORDER: 

CASE NO. CV-08-5590 (JF) 

SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: July 7, 2010. WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 

 /s/ Thomas S. Fletcher 

GERSON A. ZWEIFACH 

PAUL B. GAFFNEY 

AARON P. MAURER 

DAVID I. BERL 

JESSAMYN S. BERNIKER 

THOMAS S. FLETCHER 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MEDIMMUNE, LLC 

 

DATED: July 7, 2010. WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

 /s/ Peter Sandel 

MATTHEW D. POWERS 

VERNON M. WINTERS 

PETER SANDEL 

REBECCA FETT 

AARON Y. HUANG 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PDL BIOPHARMA, INC. 

 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ________________. 

 

THE HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

XXXXXXXXX July 8, 2010 xxxxxxxxxx

Case 5:08-cv-05590-JF Document 624 Filed 07/08/10 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 4. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PROTECTIVE ORDER: 

CASE NO. CV-08-5590 (JF) 

GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION

I, Jeffrey E. Faucette, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the 

Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Modifying Protective Order. 

In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Thomas S. Fletcher and Peter 

Sandel have concurred in this filing. 

/s/ 

Jeffrey E. Faucette 

XXXXXXXXX

Case 5:08-cv-05590-JF Document 624 Filed 07/08/10 Page 5 of 5