Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02527/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02527-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jeffrey Gregory Lopez, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al. 

 Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-2527-PHX-MHM

ORDER

Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

on October 23, 2006. On May 14, 2007 Respondents filed their Answer. Petitioner filed an

Amended Reply on July 6, 2007. Respondents filed a Supplemental Response and Petitioner

filed a Supplemental Reply. On December 30, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report

and Recommendation. 

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Failure to timely file objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge

/ / / 

Case 2:06-cv-02527-MHM Document 44 Filed 02/02/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

may be considered a waiver of a party’s right to de novo consideration of the issues. See

United States v. Reyna-Tapia 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

After a complete and independent review of the issues presented, the Court finds itself

in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Grounds 1(d) (ineffectiveness re drugs), 2(a) (due

process re drugs), and 2(b) (due process re intensive probation) of Petitioner’s Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed October 23, 2006 [doc. 1] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that as to Ground 1(c) (ineffectiveness re intensive

probation), Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed October 23, 2006 [doc. 1]

is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall be released from all restraints as a

result of his probation violation, including community supervision, unless the State of

Arizona provides him with a rehearing on the revocation of his probation as a result of his

admission of his violation of probation. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 2nd day of February, 2009.

Case 2:06-cv-02527-MHM Document 44 Filed 02/02/09 Page 2 of 2