Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00830/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00830-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD M. GILMAN, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0830 LKK GGH P

vs.

S. FISHER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

The undersigned held a telephone conference, on April 5, 2007, with plaintiff pro

se, Richard Gilman, and counsel for defendants, Stephen Acquisto, to resolve defendants’ request

to reduce the burden of their production by further narrowing the previously ordered production

of a portion of subsequent parole consideration hearing transcripts in 2006 for convicted male

first degree murderers serving sentences of 25 years to life. See Orders, filed on 3/28/07, and on

1/30/07. 

Following the conference, the court makes the following ORDERS:

1. Defendants will produce only the specific pages of the decision portion of 

parole consideration hearing transcripts solely from subsequent parole consideration hearings for

convicted male first degree murderers serving sentences of 25 years to life, for the months of

Case 2:05-cv-00830-MCE-CKD Document 80 Filed 04/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 This Order supersedes and is intended to limit the extension of time for production that 1

had been granted in the Order, filed on 3/28/07.

2

January, February, October, November and December of the year of 2006;

2. Given that defendants have sought to limit the production, defense counsel has

agreed that any argument that this production does not constitute a sufficient representative

sample of the Board’s decision-making with regard to subsequent parole consideration hearings

for male first degree murderers is waived;

3. Defendants must produce and make available to plaintiff the transcripts, as set

forth above, within thirty (30) days of the filed date of this order; upon production of the 1

transcripts, defendants are directed to re-notice their previously vacated summary judgment

motion as of the date of service of production, by filing and serving only a new notice of motion,

since the motion, memorandum and other supporting documents have been previously filed and

served; 

4. Upon service of the transcripts and re-notice of the summary judgment motion,

plaintiff will have thirty (30) days to review the production and to file any opposition or

supplemental opposition to defendants’ summary judgment motion;

5. The transcripts will be stored in a secure location at the prison, preferably in

the senior librarian’s office in the prison law library; and

6. Plaintiff will have full access to the transcripts, but he will only have access

while he is in the prison law library; thus, defendants are to ascertain that plaintiff is granted the

most latitude possible to be in the law library to review the records.

7. Defendants will have fifteen (15) days, following service of any supplemental

opposition by plaintiff to their dispositive motion, to file a reply.

DATED: 4/6/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009/gilm0830.ord2

Case 2:05-cv-00830-MCE-CKD Document 80 Filed 04/06/07 Page 2 of 2