Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03424/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03424-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 - 1 -

STIPULATION TO ALLOW FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

James A. Michel

State Bar No. 184730

2912 Diamond St. #373

San Francisco CA 94131

415/ 239-4949

(Fax 239-0156)

attyjmichel@gmail.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

ALEXANDRA POLAKOVIC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ALEXANDRA POLAKOVIC, an

individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT

PROCESSING, INC., a California

corporation; PRESCOTT

WOODFORD, individually and in his

official capacity, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

Case No. C 3:14-cv-03424 MEJ

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED

ORDER TO ALLOW FILING OF

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Judge: Hon. Maria-Elena James

Ctrm : Courtroom B, 15th Floor

Loc’n : 450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco CA 94102

The parties, Plaintiff, ALEXANDRA POLAKOVIC, and Defendants,

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT PROCESSING, INC. and PRESCOTT WOODFORD,

each through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following:

1. Defendants ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT PROCESSING, INC. (“EDP”) and

WOODFORD would like to remove certain affirmative defenses from their answer

filed on 11/21/2014, to avoid a motion to strike affirmative defenses by plaintiff;

2. Plaintiff would like to add two paragraphs to her complaint regarding

entitlement to injunctive relief. A copy of the proposed first amended complaint is

Case 3:14-cv-03424-MEJ Document 23 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 2
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 - 2 -

STIPULATION TO ALLOW FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

attached hereto as Exhibit 1. The proposed new allegations are paragraph numbers

98 and 99, on page 25 of Exhibit 1.

3. Pursuant to Case Management Order, the parties have until March 2, 2015

to file amended pleadings.

4. Pursuant to the foregoing, the parties request an order from the Court as

follows:

(a) allowing plaintiff to file a first amended complaint (FAC) forthwith;

(b) order defendants to file an answer to the FAC by March 13, 2015; and 

(c) giving plaintiff until March 17, 2015 to file a motion to strike defendants’

answer to the FAC.

DATED: March 2, 2015 ___/s/ James A. Michel_______ JAMES A. MICHEL

Attorney for Plaintiff

ALEXANDRA POLAKOVIC

DATED: March 2, 2015 __/s/ Jonathan M. Blute_______

JONATHAN M. BLUTE

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney

Attorneys for Defendants

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT

PROCESSING, INC. and PRESCOTT

WOODFORD

Signature Attestation pursuant to L.R. 5-1 (i)(3)

James Michel hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _________________ ________________________

HON. MARIA-ELENA JAMES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-03424-MEJ Document 23 Filed 03/03/15 Page 2 of 2