Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01043/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01043-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHELLE ROBERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

KAISER FOUNDATION

HOSPITALS, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C04-1043 TEH 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION

TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT OF

MELODY JAMES

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Default filed

on June 8, 2005. Defendant requests that the default against Defendant Melody James be set

aside because there is no evidence that Defendant James has been properly served. However,

Plaintiff concedes that the filing of an amended complaint on September 22, 2005, renders

moot the default entered against Defendant James for failing to respond to the first amended

complaint, which was filed on April 28, 2004. Pl.’s Mem. of P. & A. in Supp. of Pl.’s Mot.

for an Order to Serve Melody James by Publication at 3:21-25. Thus, no oral argument on

Defendant’s motion is necessary, and the Court hereby cancels the motion hearing currently

scheduled for Monday, October 3, 2005. Because Plaintiff concedes that the entry of default

against Defendant James is moot, the Court need not reach the merits of Defendant’s motion

and makes no finding regarding the sufficiency of evidence of service on Defendant James. 

Based on Plaintiff’s concession, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Set

Aside Default Against Defendant James is GRANTED. 

Case 3:04-cv-01043-TEH Document 149 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court will address Plaintiff’s motion regarding service of the second amended

complaint on Defendant James after the parties have fully briefed the issue according to the

briefing schedule established by the Civil Local Rules. Unless the Court orders otherwise,

Plaintiff’s motion will be heard as noticed on Monday, October 31, 2005, at 10:00 AM. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED 09/27/05 

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:04-cv-01043-TEH Document 149 Filed 09/27/05 Page 2 of 2