Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02301/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02301-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

STIPULATED ORDER TO STAY THE CASE

- 1 - CASE NO. C 05 02301 CRB

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

Daniel E. Alberti (State Bar No. 68620) dalberti@mwe.com

Stephen J. Akerley (State Bar No. 160757) sakerley@mwe.com

3150 Porter Drive

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212

Telephone: 650.813.5000

Facsimile: 650.813.5100

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

Joseph H. Paquin, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) jpaquin@mwe.com

227 West Monroe Street, Suite 4400

Chicago, IL 60606-5096

Telephone: 312.372.2000

Facsimile: 312.984.7700

Attorneys for Plaintiff HITACHI, LTD.

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

Peter H. Kang (SBN 158101) pkang@sidley.com

555 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415.772.1200

Facsimile: 415.772.7400

Attorneys for Defendant AMTRAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

HITACHI, LTD., a Japanese corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMTRAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a

Taiwanese corporation,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C 05 02301 CRB (JL)

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

STIPULATED ORDER TO STAY THE

CASE

Whereas, the parties are engaged in advanced settlement discussions and wish to

concentrate their efforts toward reaching a final resolution. Hitachi, Ltd. and AmTRAN

Technology Co., Ltd. (“the Parties”) have reached an agreement on a Term Sheet resolving

certain claims relating to AmTRAN’s products. The parties have also formulated a framework

AS MODIFIED

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 83 Filed 10/30/06 Page 1 of 2
MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

STIPULATED ORDER TO STAY THE CASE

-2- Case No. C 03 5792 WHA

for the possible resolution of a remaining claim involving a third-party.

Pursuant the Term Sheet, the Parties stipulate to stay this case until the Final Agreement

as contemplated in the Term Sheet (“Final Agreement”) between the Parties is reached or some

other time as the Court may decide. The Parties will provide the Court with a Chambers copy of

the confidential Term Sheet, if requested. After a Final Agreement is reached between the

Parties, the Parties will seek to lift the stay.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Finding good cause, the Court stays this case until a Final Agreement is reached between

the Parties. After the Final Agreement is reached, the Parties will move the court to lift the stay.

Dated: October 25, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

By: /s/ Daniel E. Alberti

Daniel E. Alberti

Stephen J. Akerley

Joseph H. Paquin, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice)

Attorneys for Plaintiff, HITACHI, LTD.,

a Japanese corporation

Dated: October 25, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: /s/ Peter H. Kang

Peter H. Kang

Attorneys for Defendant AMTRAN

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a Taiwanese

corporation

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated:

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

December 15, 2006 or upon further order of the Court. October 27, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02301-CRB Document 83 Filed 10/30/06 Page 2 of 2