Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01785/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01785-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL 

CASE NO. C04-01785 RMW 

2818633_1.DOC 

Keaton S. Parekh, State Bar No. 214396 

Jimmy M. Shin, State Bar No. 200161 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: 650-813-5000 

Facsimile: 650-813-5100 

jshin@mwe.com 

Mark G. Davis (Pro Hac Vice) 

D. Sean Trainor (Pro Hac Vice) 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

600 13th Street, N.W. 

Washington D. C. 20005-3096 

Telephone: 202-756-8000 

Facsimile: 202-756-8087 

Ron E. Shulman, State Bar No. 178263 

Terry Kearney, State Bar No. 160054 

Michael B. Levin, State Bar No. 172329 

Christopher Parry, State Bar No. 209858 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & 

ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

cparry@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TREND MICRO INCORPORATED 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

FORTINET, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a California corporation; 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

FORTINET, INC., a Delaware Corporation; 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. C04-01785 RMW 

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their 

designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice 

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). 

Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. 

// 

Case 5:04-cv-01785-RMW Document 54 Filed 02/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL 

CASE NO. C04-01785 RMW

-2- 2818633_1.DOC 

Dated: February 10, 2006 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

By: /s/ 

Mark G. Davis 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Trend Micro Incorporated 

Dated: February 10, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ 

Michael B. Levin 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

 Fortinet, Inc. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________________________________ 

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, 

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained 

from Mark G. Davis. 

Dated: February 10, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ 

Michael B. Levin 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

Fortinet, Inc. 

Case 5:04-cv-01785-RMW Document 54 Filed 02/13/06 Page 2 of 2