Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01455/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01455-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

USA PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., a )

California corporation, )

) 2:06-cv-1455-GEB-DAD

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

v. ) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

) CONFERENCE AND RULE 4(m)

VAN LEEUWEN ENTERPRISES, a ) NOTICE

California corporation, )

 )

)

Defendant. )

)

By Order dated June 30, 2006, a status conference was

scheduled in this case for September 25, 2006. On September 11, 2006,

Plaintiff filed a request to continue the status conference, in which

it states “the Complaint has not yet been served by Plaintiff on

Defendant . . . .” (Plaintiff’s Request at 1.) Accordingly, the

status conference is reset to commence at 9:00 a.m. on December 18,

2006. In accordance with the requirements set forth in the June 30

Order, the parties shall file a joint status report no later than

December 4, 2006.

If Defendant is not served by October 27, 2006, Defendant

could be dismissed from this action under Federal Rule of Civil

Case 2:06-cv-01455-GEB-DAD Document 7 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Procedure 4(m). If Plaintiff does not perfect service by this date,

Plaintiff shall show cause no later than 4:00 p.m. on November 3,

2006, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to serve

Defendant within Rule 4(m)’s 120-day time period. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 18, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01455-GEB-DAD Document 7 Filed 09/19/06 Page 2 of 2