Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04788/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04788-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL DOUGLAS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

TOWN OF PORTOLA VALLEY, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-4788 CRB

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

On July 21, 2010, this Court granted with prejudice all pending motions to dismiss. 

This Court further understands that Plaintiffs have not yet served the amended complaint on

the sole remaining Defendant, Sausal Creek Associates. Therefore, Plaintiffs are ORDERED

TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) for

failure to prosecute. In deciding whether dismissal is appropriate, the Court will consider all

filings to date. To the extent Plaintiffs wish the Court to consider any additional evidence or

written argument, such material shall be filed at or before noon on Thursday, August 12,

2010. The Court will hear oral argument on the Order to Show Cause at 10:00am on Friday, 

//

//

//

//

Case 3:09-cv-04788-CRB Document 48 Filed 07/29/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2009\4788\Order to Show Cause.wpd 2

August 13, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 29, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-04788-CRB Document 48 Filed 07/29/10 Page 2 of 2