Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-02043/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-02043-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff/Respondent, 

v. 

David Casimiro Bravo-Cuevas, 

Defendant/Movant.

No. CV-12-02043-PHX-SRB

 CR02-01002-PHX-SRB 

ORDER 

 Movant, David Casimiro Bravo-Cuevas, filed a Second Amended Motion to 

Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on July 1, 2013. 

The United States filed its response in opposition on February 11, 2014. Movant did not 

file a reply. 

 The Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation on May 2, 2014 

recommending that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence be 

denied. In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation 

within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such 

Case 2:12-cv-02043-SRB Document 25 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been 

filed. 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. 

 IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the Order of this Court. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or 

Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because Movant has not made a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly 

 Dated this 23rd day of June, 2014. 

Case 2:12-cv-02043-SRB Document 25 Filed 06/23/14 Page 2 of 2