Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05711/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05711-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 06-05711 JF (PVT)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

(JFLC3)

**Filed 01/08/2008** 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

D. LIN NGUYEN,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

PHUC DIN DO,

 Defendant.

Case Number C 06-05711 JF (PVT)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

SECOND REQUEST FOR

RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiff D. Lin Nguyen (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action on September 19, 2006

alleging attorney malpractice. On September 11, 2007, Defendant Phuc Din Do (“Defendant”)

filed a motion for summary judgment. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was noticed

for a hearing on October 12, 2007. Neither party appeared. Accordingly, the Court took the

motion under submission without oral argument. On October 12, 2007, the Court granted

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and entered final judgment in favor of Defendant. On

November 19, 2007, the Court denied Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration because Plaintiff had

not alleged any additional cognizable new facts that would alter this Court’s conclusion that

Plaintiff’s claim is time-barred. Plaintiff now files a document with the Court entitled “Second

Case 5:06-cv-05711-JF Document 64 Filed 01/08/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 06-05711 JF (PVT)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

(JFLC3)

Request!!!” The body of the document does not make clear what relief Plaintiff seeks. To the

extent that Plaintiff seeks relief from judgment, that motion is denied. Plaintiff is advised that

there appears to be no conceivable basis to seek further relief in this particular action, and he is

strongly discouraged from filing any further motions, letters, or other pleadings herein. The Court

advises the Plaintiff that judgment has been entered against him in this case and his remedy is

now with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Plaintiff should follow the applicable rules for the

notice and filing of any appeal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: January 8, 2008 __________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-05711-JF Document 64 Filed 01/08/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case No. C 06-05711 JF (PVT)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

(JFLC3)

Copies of Order mailed to:

D. Lin Nguyen

2174 Diana Place

San Jose, CA 95116

Phuc Dinh Do phucdinhdo@gmail.com

Case 5:06-cv-05711-JF Document 64 Filed 01/08/08 Page 3 of 3