Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00010/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00010-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE K. COLBERT,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

M. CARRASCO, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:11-cv-00010-AWI-GSA-PC

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC

(Doc. 38.)

George K. Colbert (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. This case now proceeds with

the First Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff on May 24, 2013, against defendants Carrasco, 

Heil, Noyce, and Steadman (“Defendants”) for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. 

(Doc. 17.)

On November 25, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to extend the deadline for filing a 

motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies, from 

December 2, 2014 to December 12, 2014. (Doc. 38.) In light of the fact that Defendants filed 

their motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion on December 12, 2014, the court 

finds good cause to grant Defendants an extension of time nunc pro tunc.

Case 1:11-cv-00010-AWI-GSA Document 43 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ 

motion to extend time to file a motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion is 

GRANTED nunc pro tunc. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00010-AWI-GSA Document 43 Filed 01/29/15 Page 2 of 2