Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06656/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06656-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT MILES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06656-OWW-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 20)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 17)

ORDER CONCLUDING ENTIRE ACTION

Plaintiff, Robert Miles (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 9, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On May 24, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:04-cv-06656-OWW -DLB Document 23 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 9, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to file suit

within the one-year statute of limitations is DENIED;

3. Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims

against the Board of Prison Terms as barred by the Eleventh

Amendment is GRANTED; and,

4. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without leave to

amend, thus CONCLUDING this action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 17, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06656-OWW -DLB Document 23 Filed 08/17/06 Page 2 of 2