Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00233/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00233-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 00:0000 Cause Code Unknown

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YASH RAJ FILMS (USA), INC., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

DALJIT SINGH SIDHU, Individually )

and d/b/a DISCOUNT MART, and )

DOES 1 - 25. )

)

Defendants. )

)

____________________________________)

CIV F 09 – 00233 AWI GSA

AMENDED ORDER

DIRECTING ENTRY OF

JUDGMENT AND CLOSING 

CASE

On March 18, 2010, this court issued an order granting Plaintiff’s motion for summary

judgment on Plaintiff’s first and fourth claims for relief as stated in Plaintiff’s complaint and

awarding Plaintiff statutory damages in the amount of $80,000.00 for Defendant’s wilful

infringement of Plaintiff’s copyrights. The court further ordered that Defendant pay Plaintiff’s

attorneys fees and costs in the amount of $32,595.86. The court further ordered that Defendant

be permanently enjoined from infringing on Plaintiff’s respective copyrights and trademarks in

any manner.

Thereafter, on March 24, 2010, the court issued an order to show cause why judgment

should not be entered as to Plaintiff’s claims for infringement under the Copyright Act and under

the Lanham Act and the case closed. Response was due not later than April 2, 2010. In this

regard, it is and remains the court’s understanding that Plaintiff’s second and third claims for

Case 1:09-cv-00233-AWI-GSA Document 46 Filed 04/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

relief for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement, respectively, are incorporated into

Plaintiff’s first claim for relief and that judgment as to Plaintiff’s first claim for relief renders

Plaintiff’s second and third claims for relief moot. It is therefore the court’s understanding that

the entry of judgment in favor of Plaintiff as to Plaintiff’s first and fourth claims for relief settles

all claims alleged in this action. With that understanding, and there being no response by either

party to the court’s order to show cause, the court will proceed to order the entry of judgment and

closure of the case.

THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall ENTER

JUDGMENT in the amounts set forth above in favor of Plaintiff as to Plaintiff’s first and fourth

claims for relief. Plaintiff’s second and third claims for relief are hereby DISMISSED as moot. 

The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE THE CASE. All pending dates related to this case are

hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-00233-AWI-GSA Document 46 Filed 04/16/10 Page 2 of 2