Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05278/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05278-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Contitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

{6167/041/00169682.DOC} 1 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL RALEY’S INC’S COMPLIANCE WITH 

DEPOSITION SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SAGASER, JONES & HAHESY

2445 Capitol Street, 2nd Floor 

Post Office Box 1632 

Fresno, California 93717-1632 

Telephone: (559) 233-4800 

Timothy Jones #119841 

William C. Hahesy #105743 

John P. Kinsey #215916 

Attorneys for: Petitioners and Plaintiffs Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 

and Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, a Delaware statutory trust. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, and WAL-MART REAL 

ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, a Delaware 

statutory trust, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF TURLOCK, TURLOCK CITY 

COUNCIL, and DOES 1 through 10, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. F-04-5278 OWW DLB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

GRANTING MOTION TO 

COMPEL RALEY’S INC’S 

COMPLIANCE WITH 

DEPOSITION SUBPOENA DUCES 

TECUM 

 

 Plaintiffs Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust 

(collectively “Wal-Mart”), Defendants the City of Turlock and Turlock City Council (the 

“City”), and Non-Party Raley’s, Inc. (“Raley’s”), by and through their respective counsel of 

record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

 WHEREAS on April 12, 2005, Wal-Mart filed and served its Notice of Motion 

and Motion to Compel Raley, Inc.’s Compliance with Deposition Subpoena Duces Tecum in 

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, pursuant to Rule 

45(c)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Motion to Compel”); 

 WHEREAS the parties hereby stipulate and agree to resolve the motion as set 

forth herein. 

/// 

Case 1:04-cv-05278-OWW -DLB Document 73 Filed 05/20/05 Page 1 of 4
{6167/041/00169682.DOC} 2 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL RALEY’S INC’S COMPLIANCE WITH 

DEPOSITION SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED that: 

1. Wal-Mart’s Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART as follows: 

 a. Raley’s shall make available to Wal-Mart for inspection and copying, no 

later than May 27, 2005, the following categories of documents requested under the Subpoena: 

i. Requests 1-2: Raley’s is ordered to produce all responsive documents; 

ii. Requests 3-14: To the extent not produced in response to previous 

requests, Raley’s is ordered to produce all responsive documents for the period January 1, 

2003, through the present, concerning intended or actual communications with any employee, 

official, or representative of the City of Turlock regarding any proposed Wal-Mart Supercenter 

within the City of Turlock and/or a “big box” ordinance concerning the City of Turlock; 

iii. Requests 15-32: To the extent not produced in response to previous 

requests, Raley’s is ordered to produce all responsive documents for the period January 1, 

2003, through the present, concerning intended or actual communications with any employee, 

official, or representative of the City of Turlock regarding any proposed Wal-Mart Supercenter 

within the City of Turlock and/or a “big box” ordinance concerning the City of Turlock; 

iv. Requests 33: To the extent not produced in response to previous 

requests, Raley’s is ordered to produce all responsive documents; and 

v. Requests 34-37: To the extent not produced in response to previous 

requests, Raley’s is ordered to produce all responsive documents for the period January 1, 

2003, through the present, concerning intended or actual communications with any employee, 

official, or representative of the City of Turlock regarding any proposed Wal-Mart Supercenter 

within the City of Turlock and/or a “big box” ordinance concerning the City of Turlock. 

 b. Wal-Mart shall be afforded the right to seek modification of the scope of 

this order pending its review of the transcript for the Court’s April 18, 2005, hearing on WalMart’s November 23, 2004, Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum 

against Non-Party Save Mart. Once the transcript is received, if Wal-Mart desires to seek 

modification of the order, it will first meet and confer with Raley’s counsel. If the parties can 

agree, a modified order will be submitted to the Court. If the parties cannot agree, the parties 

Case 1:04-cv-05278-OWW -DLB Document 73 Filed 05/20/05 Page 2 of 4
{6167/041/00169682.DOC} 3 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL RALEY’S INC’S COMPLIANCE WITH 

DEPOSITION SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

will submit a letter to the Court explaining their position, attaching a copy of the transcript and 

a proposed modified order. 

 c. On or before May 23, 2005, Raley’s, at its option, may submit to the 

Court to conduct an in camera inspection of any responsive documents containing information 

protected by the attorney-client privilege or the attorney work product doctrine. The Court 

shall review any such documents, and issue a future decision concerning the production of said 

documents. 

 d. Raley’s may designate documents as “confidential” pursuant to the terms 

of the [Proposed] Second Amended Protective Order attached hereto and incorporated herein as 

Exhibit “A.” 

DATED: May , 2005. JARVIS, FAY & DOPORTO

By /S/_______________________________ 

Benjamin P. Fay, Attorneys for Defendants 

DATED: May , 2005. MURPHY, AUSTIN, ADAMS, SCHOENFELD

By /S/______________________________ 

John Fischer, Attorneys for Non-Party 

Raley’s, Inc.

DATED: May , 2005. SAGASER, JONES & HAHESY 

By /S/______________________________

John P. Kinsey, Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 1:04-cv-05278-OWW -DLB Document 73 Filed 05/20/05 Page 3 of 4
{6167/041/00169682.DOC} 4 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL RALEY’S INC’S COMPLIANCE WITH 

DEPOSITION SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 The court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing 

therefor: 

 IT IS SO ORDERED: 

DATED: May _20, 2005 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER____ 

 Honorable Oliver W. Wanger 

 United States District Judge 

 

Case 1:04-cv-05278-OWW -DLB Document 73 Filed 05/20/05 Page 4 of 4