Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00187/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00187-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN GARRETT BAUTISTA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JIM BABCOCK, etc.; et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 04-187 SI (pr)

PROTECTIVE AND SCHEDULING

ORDER 

Upon good cause shown, defendants’ unopposed motion for a protective order is

GRANTED. (Docket # 53.) The documents sought to be protected and the extent of the

protection sought appear to be as mentioned in the Defendants’ Amended Privilege Log In

Support Of Motion For Protective Order (“Amended Privilege Log”). (Docket # 55.) The

documents identified in the Amended Privilege Log as not having been produced need not be

produced at all to plaintiff. The documents identified in the Amended Privilege Log as having

been produced in redacted form to plaintiff need not been produced in unredacted form. In

other words, defendants do not have to further produce to plaintiff the documents listed in the

Amended Privilege Log as not produced or produced in redacted form.

As mentioned in the January 20, 2006 Order Denying Motions And Setting Briefing

Schedule, the court wanted to resolve any motion for a protective order before entertaining any

motion to compel. Having ruled upon the motion for a protective order, the court now sets a

briefing schedule for plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery, if he still wishes to file such a

motion. 

Case 3:04-cv-00187-SI Document 62 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. Plaintiff must file and serve on defense counsel any motion to compel no

later than February 9, 2007. Plaintiff may not move to compel any document that is subject to

the protection mentioned in the first paragraph of this order. Plaintiff is reminded that he must

engage in a good faith effort to meet and confer to resolve any discovery dispute before he files

a motion to compel.

2. Defendants must file and serve any opposition to plaintiff’s motion to

compel no later than March 9, 2007. 

3. Plaintiff must file and serve on defense counsel his reply brief, if any, no

later than March 16, 2007.

Plaintiff is reminded that, because he is no longer in custody, he is no longer subject to

the prisoner mailbox rule which deems documents filed when mailed by prisoners. As long as

he remains out of custody, any filing from plaintiff must reach the courthouse by the deadline

and not merely be mailed by the deadline. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2007 ______________________

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-00187-SI Document 62 Filed 01/11/07 Page 2 of 2