Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-md-01699/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-md-01699-845/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX

MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,

 /

This document relates to:

Antoinette Smith, Betty Grayer,

Jeanette Videau, Pearly Fleming,

Sarah Matthews and Laura Sumly, the

Surviving Children of Henrietta

Marks, 07-1167 CRB

___________________________________/

No. MDL 05-01699 CRB

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AND DISMISSING

CLAIMS FOR A FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

On August 6, 2007, the Court issued an Order To Show Cause directing the above

plaintiffs to show cause as to why (1) their counsel’s motion to withdraw should not be

granted; and (2) each plaintiff’s claims should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution. In

particular, the Court directed each plaintiff to notify the Court in writing on or before August

30, 2007 of the reasons the withdrawal should not be granted or the case dismissed if plaintiff

wished to contest either action. As of the date of this Order, none of the plaintiffs has

responded to the Court’s August 6, 2007 Order and none has otherwise communicated with

the Court. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ counsel’s motions to withdraw are GRANTED and 

//

Case 3:05-md-01699-CRB Document 1861 Filed 09/19/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\dismissalorders\osc\Smithetal.wpd 2

each plaintiff’s claims are dismissed with prejudice for a failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: Sep. 19, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-md-01699-CRB Document 1861 Filed 09/19/07 Page 2 of 2