Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01229/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01229-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 32:4323 Employment Rights of Uniformed Officers

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

NO. CIV. S-09-1229 LKK/EFB

Plaintiff,

v.

O R D E R

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,

Defendant.

 /

On February 10, 2010, plaintiff United States of America filed

a motion to extend time to file a motion to compel discovery.

Specifically, the plaintiff requests to be able to file its motion

by February 17, 2010, yet does not seek to change the final hearing

date of March 3, 2010 set in the scheduling order. Plaintiff has

demonstrated good cause to extend the date to file a motion to

compel. Plaintiff’s counsel are located in the District of

Columbia, and their offices were closed due to the recent snow

storm. As such, it was unable to determine what discovery defendant

had produced by the deadline to file motions to compel. However,

Case 2:09-cv-01229-LKK -EFB Document 28 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

to simply move the date to file the motion without adjusting the

hearing date necessarily deprives defendant of adequate time to

file an opposition, if any, to plaintiff’s motion to compel.

Accordingly, the court modifies the scheduling order such that

motions to compel shall be filed so that they may be heard by March

17, 2010. All other dates remain unchanged.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 12, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-01229-LKK -EFB Document 28 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 2