Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00023/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00023-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED ORDER 

1 Case No. C-08-0023 MHP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SPENCER HOSIE (No. 101777) 

shosie@hosielaw.com

BRUCE WECKER (No. 78530) 

bwecker@hosielaw.com 

GEORGE F. BISHOP (No. 89205) 

gbishop@hosielaw.com

HOSIE McARTHUR LLP 

One Market, Spear Tower, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 247-6000 

Facsimile: (415) 247-6001 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Burst.com, Inc. 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

REALNETWORKS, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

BURST.COM, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. C-08-0023 MHP 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

PROPOSED ORDER 

Plaintiff RealNetworks, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Burst.com, Inc. (“Defendant”), 

hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows: 

WHEREAS, on or about January 7, 2008, Plaintiff served its Complaint for Declaratory 

Judgment and Demand for Jury Trial (“Complaint”) upon Defendant; and 

WHEREAS, two previous extensions of time to answer or otherwise respond to the 

Complaint have been granted pursuant to stipulation, which in aggregate extended the due date 

from January 28, 2008 to March 11, 2008, the date Defendant’s response to the Complaint is 

presently due; and 

Case 3:08-cv-00023-MHP Document 21 Filed 03/12/08 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 2 Case No. C-08-0023 MHP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, no trial date has yet been set in this action; and 

WHEREAS, Defendant requires additional time to respond to the Complaint, and 

Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective counsel of record, have agreed to extend the 

time by which Defendant must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by an additional 

two weeks, to and including March 25, 2008: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their 

respective attorneys of record that Defendant will have to and including March 25, 2008, to 

serve and file an answer or other response to the Complaint. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through 

their respective attorneys of record that by entering into this stipulation, neither party waives 

any rights with respect to the issues presented in this litigation and, specifically, Defendant does 

not waive any rights or defenses with respect to the Complaint. 

DATED: March 10, 2008 

HOSIE McARTHUR LLP 

By: _______________________________ 

 George F. Bishop 

/s/ 

Attorneys for Defendant Burst.com, Inc. 

 HOWREY LLP 

 

 By: _______________________________ /s/ 

 Robert F. Kramer 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff RealNetworks, Inc. 

 

I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the electronic 

filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. 

DATED: March 10, 2008 

 

 

 _______________________________ /s/ 

 George F. Bishop 

COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED ORDER 

Case 3:08-cv-00023-MHP Document 21 Filed 03/12/08 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 3 Case No. C-08-0023 MHP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER 

 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the time in which 

Defendant may serve and file an answer or other response to the Complaint is extended to and 

including March 25, 2008. 

SO ORDERED 

March __, 2008 _____________________________ 

 Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

United States District Judge 

COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED ORDER 

11

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:08-cv-00023-MHP Document 21 Filed 03/12/08 Page 3 of 3