Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04660/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04660-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER

CASE NO. 06-04660 JW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Linda J. Thayer, Esq. (SBN 195,115) 

linda.thayer@finnegan.com

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

Stanford Research Park 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Barbara C. McCurdy, Esq. (Admitted ProHac Vice) 

barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

901 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20001 

Telephone: (202) 408-4000 

Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MACROVISION CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 

CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

 CASE NO. CV 06-04660 JW 

STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED 

ORDER] TO EXTEND TIME TO 

ANSWER COMPLAINT 

Case 5:06-cv-04660-JW Document 7 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER

CASE NO. 06-04660 JW

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), Defendant Intertrust Technologies Corporation (“Intertrust”) 

has requested, and Plaintiff Macrovision Corporation (“Macrovision”) has agreed, to extend the time 

for Intertrust to respond to Macrovision’s Complaint from August 21, 2006 to August 28, 2006. 

This extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. 

Accordingly, it is hereby stipulated that Intertrust has until August 28, 2006 to respond to the 

Complaint. 

By her signature below, counsel for Defendant swears under penalty of perjury that counsel 

for Plaintiff concurred in the filing of this document. 

DATED: August 21, 2006 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT 

& DUNNER, LLP 

 By / s / 

 Linda J. Thayer 

Attorneys for Defendant Intertrust Technologies 

Corporation. 

DATED: August 21, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

 By / s / 

 Michael D. Powell 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Macrovision Corporation 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: August 22, 2006 ___________________________________________ 

 James Ware 

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:06-cv-04660-JW Document 7 Filed 08/22/06 Page 2 of 2