Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_90-cv-00478/USCOURTS-caed-1_90-cv-00478-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

09dp00478.OGrantPetnrEOT.Car.pdf.wpd 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONSTANTINO CARRERA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

JILL L. BROWN, as Warden of San )

Quentin State Prison, )

)

Respondent. )

)

Case No. CIV. F-90-478-AWI-P

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

REQUEST TO EXTEND BRIEFING

SCHEDULE 

This matter is before the Court on the request of Petitioner

Constantino Carrera for a two-month extension in the briefing schedule

previously established in the Court’s March 30, 2005 briefing order.

In the supporting declaration of Carrera’s counsel, Stephen B.

Bedrick, Mr. Bedrick represents that counsel for Respondent Jill L.

Brown, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison (the “Warden”) does not

object to the request. 

At issue are Carrera’s traverse, currently due July 15, 2005,

Carrera’s anticipated motion for an evidentiary hearing, currently due

August 15, 2005, the Warden’s opposition brief to the evidentiary

hearing motion, currently due September 15, 2005, and Carrera’s reply

brief regarding the evidentiary hearing motion, currently due

September 30, 2005. Mr. Bedrick explains that a death in his family

coupled with his recent responsibilities in a case he argued before

Case 1:90-cv-00478-AWI Document 255 Filed 06/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

09dp00478.OGrantPetnrEOT.Car.pdf.wpd 2

the United States Supreme Court (Johnson v. California, No. 04-6964)

on April 18, 2005, have diverted much of his available professional

time from the present case. In addition, he advises the Court that

he has a “preplanned family vacation” for the first three weeks of

July. The Court accepts Mr. Bedrick’s representations.

Based on the supporting declaration, all documents on file in

this matter, and for good cause shown, the Court grants Carrera’s

request to extend the previously established briefing schedule, as

follows:

1. Carrera’s traverse to the Warden’s opposition brief

shall be electronically filed and served no later than

September 15, 2005;

2. Carrera’s motion for an evidentiary hearing and/or

further discovery shall be electronically filed and

served no later than October 17, 2005;

3. The Warden’s opposition brief to the motion for

further factual development shall be electronically

filed and served no more than 30 days thereafter; and

4. Carrera’s reply brief to the opposition regarding

further factual development shall be electronically

filed and served no more than 15 days thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 15, 2005 

 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

Anthony W. Ishii

United States District Judge

Case 1:90-cv-00478-AWI Document 255 Filed 06/16/05 Page 2 of 2