Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02559/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02559-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REGINA FRAIZER,

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-cv-02559-JD 

ORDER RE RECONSIDERATION OR 

REOPENING

Re: Dkt. No. 18

Pro se plaintiff Regina Fraizer asks the Court to set aside the dismissal of this case for 

excusable neglect under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). The Court dismissed the case with 

prejudice on September 2, 2015, for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 14. Plaintiff filed and served 

the complaint but then failed to pursue her claims in any way or oppose defendant’s motion to 

dismiss. Id. The Court extended plaintiff’s time to respond to the motion by several weeks, and 

issued an order to show cause warning her that the case would be dismissed if she did not respond. 

Dkt. No. 12. The Court heard nothing from plaintiff and dismissal was entered. 

About three weeks after the entry of dismissal, plaintiff filed a request to re-open the 

matter. Dkt. No. 18. Plaintiff acknowledges that she received the motion to dismiss on June 18, 

2015, three days after it was filed, and says she filed an opposition on June 30, 2015. Id. But the 

ECF docket shows no filing or submission by plaintiff, and she did not proffer any other evidence 

of opposing the motion in the request to reconsider. Moreover, plaintiff does not explain why she 

did not respond to the order to show cause even though it is apparent she was receiving the filings 

in the case. And plaintiff has not offered any showing of good cause or excusable neglect for not 

responding to the motion or the order to show cause.

Case 3:15-cv-02559-JD Document 20 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Consequently, the Court declines to re-open the case or to reconsider the order of 

dismissal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2016

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-02559-JD Document 20 Filed 02/10/16 Page 2 of 2