Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05972/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05972-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMOND D. HALL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DR. KIM, M.D.,

Defendant. 

 /

1:02-cv-05972-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 68)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Doc. 54)

Plaintiff Waymond D. Hall (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 22, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations on October 28, 2005. Defendant did

Case 1:02-cv-05972-OWW -SMS Document 72 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

not file a response.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 22,

2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, filed March

25, 2005, is GRANTED, thus concluding this action in its

entirety; and,

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment

for defendant and against plaintiff. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 19, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05972-OWW -SMS Document 72 Filed 12/19/05 Page 2 of 2