Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03577/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03577-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. 1

Case No. C 05-03577 JF

ORDER VACATING MARCH 2, 2010, ORDER AND PRESERVING STAY OF IMPOSITION OF COSTS

(JFLC3)

**E-Filed 3/3/10**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

EVELYN ROSA and ROBERT ROSA,

individually and as the personal representatives of

MICHAEL ROBERT ROSA, deceased,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

CITY OF SEASIDE et al., 

 Defendants.

Case Number C 05-03577 JF

ORDER VACATING MARCH 2, 1

2010, ORDER AND PRESERVING

STAY OF IMPOSITION OF COSTS

On February 16, 2010, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion to preclude TASER

International, Inc. (“TASER”) from recovering its bill of costs, but stayed the imposition of costs

on the condition that Plaintiffs provide either a bond or some other form of security (“February 16

order”). On February 22, 2010, Plaintiffs informed the Court and TASER by e-mail of their

intent to post a supersedeas bond for the full amount of the costs within thirty days of the

February 16 order. For reasons that are unclear, the e-mail did not come to the attention of

chambers staff. 

Case 5:05-cv-03577-JF Document 283 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 05-03577 JF

ORDER VACATING MARCH 2, 2010, ORDER AND PRESERVING STAY OF IMPOSITION OF COSTS

(JFLC3)

On March 2, 2010, believing that security had not been posted, the Court issued an order

lifting the stay (“March 2 order”). Good cause appearing, the March 2 order is hereby vacated. 

As TASER has not objected to Plaintiffs’ proposal with respect to the bond, the stay will remain

in effect pending Plaintiffs’ appeal of the underlying judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 3/3/10 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-03577-JF Document 283 Filed 03/03/10 Page 2 of 2