Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00576/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00576-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 This case was initially assigned to now retired Magistrate Judge Peter A. Nowinski. By

order of Chief Judge David F. Levi, this case was reassigned to the undersigned, Magistrate

Judge Edmund F. Brennan, on August 29, 2006. In the interim period between Judge Nowinski’s

retirement and Judge Brennan’s appointment, this case was temporarily assigned to Magistrate

Judge Gregory H. Hollows, who issued the Findings and Recommendations referenced above.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD B. MCNEARNEY,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-06-576 WBS EFB PS

vs.

CITICORP CREDIT 

SERVICES, INC., et al.

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On August 29, 2006, plaintiff filed a “Declaration” requesting more time to object

to the Findings and Recommendations made by Magistrate Judge Gregory H. Hollows on July

25, 2006.1

 Plaintiff claims that he never received a copy of the Findings and Recommendations,

even though they were served on plaintiff via U.S. Mail at the address he currently uses. He

states that he only learned that the Findings and Recommendations had been issued when he

called the Clerk on August 22, 2006. According to plaintiff, his address is a mailbox maintained

with Mailbox Express, but in previous filings he has referred to his mailbox number as a “suite.” 

Case 2:06-cv-00576-WBS-EFB Document 23 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 It is possible that this discrepancy caused plaintiff not to receive the Findings and

Recommendations. 

Therefore, in the interest of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The Clerk immediately serve on plaintiff another copy of the Findings and

Recommendations at the following address: Ronald B. McNearney, c/o Mailbox Express, 3069

Alamo Drive, Mailbox Number #115, Vacaville, California 95687.

2. Notwithstanding the previously allotted time in the Findings and

Recommendations, plaintiff shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file objections to the

Findings and Recommendations, should he so desire. The document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Maritnez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991). 

3. No further extensions shall be granted. 

DATED: September 7, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00576-WBS-EFB Document 23 Filed 09/08/06 Page 2 of 2