Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03814/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03814-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIN WAH KUNG,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITIBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Defendant. /

No. C 16-03814 WHA

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

In lieu of a response to defendant’s pending motion to dismiss, plaintiff filed an

amended complaint. The Court asked defendant to state whether the motion to dismiss should

be denied as moot without prejudice to a renewed motion directed at the amended pleading or if

it would prefer to continue with the present motion and address the amendments in the reply. 

Defendant has submitted a statement that “the currently pending motion to dismiss

(Doc. No. 10) should be denied as moot without prejudice” (Dkt. 14). As such, the motion to

dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE to a renewed motion directed at the

amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 5, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-03814-WHA Document 15 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 1