Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02888/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02888-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 151
Nature of Suit: Overpayments under the Medicare Act
Cause of Action: 28:2345 Medicare Recovery

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS, CASE # C 07-02888 MJJ

Dario de Ghetaldi - Bar No. 126782

Jerry E. Nastari - Bar No. 151756

Amanda L. Riddle - Bar No. 215221

COREY, LUZAICH, PLISKA, DE GHETALDI & NASTARI LLP

700 El Camino Real

P.O. Box 669

Millbrae, California 94030-0669

Telephone: (650) 871-5666

Facsimile: (650) 871-4144

Colleen Duffy Smith - Bar No. 161163

Michael G. Reedy - Bar No. 161002

MCMANIS, FAULKNER & MORGAN

50 West San Fernando Street, Suite 1000

San Jose, CA 95113 

Telephone: (408) 279-8700

Facsimile: (408) 279-3244

Plaintiffs’ Co-Counsel

[Other Counsel on Signature Page]

PETER D. KEISLER

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

SHEILA M. LIEBER

PETER ROBBINS 

U.S. Department of Justice

20 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Room 7142

Washington, DC 20530

Telephone: (202) 514-3953

Facsimile: (202) 616-8470

Email: peter.robbins@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 07-2888 MJJ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF HEARING

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 3:07-cv-02888-JSW Document 37 Filed 11/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS, CASE # C 07-02888 MJJ

STIPULATION

Whereas plaintiffs’ opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss is currently due on

November 6, 2007, and plaintiffs’ counsel is set to participate in a mediation in a multi-million

dollar case on November 7, 2007; and 

Whereas plaintiffs’ counsel believes that the motion is sufficiently complex to require

additional time to prepare an opposition than is given under the Local Rules; 

The parties in the above captioned action hereby stipulate to the following:

The hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss, which currently set for December 11, 2007,

shall be continued to January 15, 2008, at 9:30 a.m.

Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion to dismiss shall be due on November 20, 2007, and

defendant's reply shall be due on December 28, 2007.

The status conference currently set for January 15, 2008 shall be continued to February 26,

2008 at 2:00 p.m.

Counsel respectfully request that the Court enter a scheduling order in conformity with this

stipulation.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 31, 2007 COREY, LUZAICH, PLISKA, DE GHETALDI & NASTARI LLP

By: /s/ Dario de Ghetaldi

DARIO DE GHETALDI

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Members of the Class

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 31, 2007

By: /s/ Peter Robbins

PETER ROBBINS

Department of Justice

Attorneys for Defendant

SO ORDERED.

Dated:_________________ __________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

11/01/07

Case 3:07-cv-02888-JSW Document 37 Filed 11/02/07 Page 2 of 2