Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-01255/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-01255-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENREACH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

EMBEDDED INTERNET SOLUTIONS,

INC., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-04-1255 CW (EMC)

ORDER RE ATTENDANCE AT

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

GUOHONG XU, representative of Defendants Embedded Internet Solutions, Inc., Shenzhen

Zhuozhuang Network Technology, Inc., Guohong Xu, and Jin Wu, requested to be excused from

personally appearing at the settlement conference scheduled for September 12, 2006. Additionally,

MARY MINCH, representative of Defendant AlphaSmart, Inc., requested to be excused from

personally appearing at the settlement conference, should the Court grant Defendant representative

XU’s request. 

Judge Wilken’s September 1, 2006 Order of Reference to Magistrate Judge and Denying

Request for Continuance states “Due to the short notice, all parties and attorneys must make

themselves available on whatever date and time the Magistrate Judge has available.” (Docket No.

347). Based on Judge Wilken’s order, and this Court’s order of September 1, 2006 (Docket No.

348), the Court DENIES Defendant XU and Defendant MINCH’s request to excuse personal

attendance. Therefore, it is hereby ordered that GUOHONG XU and MARY MINCH appear at the

settlement conference in person scheduled on September 12, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. Pacific Time.

Case 4:04-cv-01255-CW Document 351 Filed 09/07/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

All Plaintiff and Defendant representatives and lead trial counsel appearing at the settlement

conference must have full authority to negotiate a settlement. A person who needs to call another

person not present before agreeing to any settlement does not have full authority. Sanctions will

be imposed if settlement cannot proceed because the representative and/or counsel does not

have full authority.

This order disposes of Docket Nos. 349 and 350.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 7, 2006 _______________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:04-cv-01255-CW Document 351 Filed 09/07/06 Page 2 of 2