Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01991/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01991-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

Case No. 2:06-CV-1991 WBS-KJM

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND REMAND TO STATE COURT 

MATTHEW J. RUGGLES, Bar No. 173052 

KATY A. BOLLS, Bar No. 233596 

LITTLER MENDELSON 

A Professional Corporation 

2520 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 390 

Sacramento, CA 95833.4227 

Telephone: 916.830.7200 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION 

LAWRANCE A. BOHM, Bar No. 208176 

BOHM LAW GROUP 

4600 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 210 

Sacramento, CA 95834 

Telephone: 916.927.5574 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

JENNY PARKS and THERESA GARCIA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JENNY PARKS and THERESA GARCIA, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AMERISOURCEBERGEN 

CORPORATION; JOHN DEPIETRO; 

ALVIN CUMAR; JOHN KITAHARA; 

RAY ALBRANTZ; and DOES 1-100 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:06-CV-1991 WBS-KJM 

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR 

PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

AND REMAND TO STATE COURT AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-01991-WBS -KJM Document 8 Filed 01/23/07 Page 1 of 4
 Plaintiffs Jenny Parks and Theresa Garcia, and Defendant AmerisourceBergen 

Corporation, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

 1. Defendants John Depietro, John Kitahara and Ray Albrantz shall be dismissed 

with prejudice; 

 2. The Fourth Cause of Action for “Denial of C.F.R.A. Rights” and the Sixth 

Cause of Action for “Adverse Employment Action in Violation of Public Policy” shall be dismissed 

with prejudice as to all parties; 

 3. Defendant AmerisourceBergen Corporation agrees that, provided John 

Depietro, John Kitahara, and Ray Albrantz remain employed by Defendant AmerisourceBergen 

Corporation, the company shall produce these individuals for a deposition and/or as a witness at trial 

as if each remained a party to the action. In the event John Depietro, John Kitahara, and/or Ray 

Albrantz separate from employment with Defendant AmerisourceBergen Corporation prior to the 

final resolution of this case in the trial court, Defendant AmerisourceBergen Corporation agrees to 

make reasonable efforts to cooperate with Plaintiffs to secure the attendance of each individual for a 

deposition and/or to appear as a witness at trial. 

4. Defendant AmerisourceBergen agrees that the videotape of the depositions of 

John Depietro, John Kitahara, and Ray Albrantz may be used at trial in the same manner as if each 

remained a party to the action. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-01991-WBS -KJM Document 8 Filed 01/23/07 Page 2 of 4
 5. Based on the foregoing, the parties stipulate and request that this lawsuit 

immediately be remanded from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 

to the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Sacramento. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 19, 2007 

/s/ Lawrance A. Bohm (authorized 01/19/07) 

LAWRANCE A. BOHM 

BOHM LAW GROUP 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

JENNY PARKS and THERESA GARCIA 

Dated: January 19, 2007 

/s/ Matthew J. Ruggles 

MATTHEW J. RUGGLES 

KATY A. BOLLS 

LITTLER MENDELSON 

A Professional Corporation 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-01991-WBS -KJM Document 8 Filed 01/23/07 Page 3 of 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND REMAND

Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court orders the following: 

 1. Defendants John Depietro, John Kitahara and Ray Albrantz hereby are 

dismissed with prejudice; 

 2. The Fourth Cause of Action for “Denial of C.F.R.A. Rights” and the Sixth 

Cause of Action for “Adverse Employment Action in Violation of Public Policy” in the Complaint 

hereby are dismissed with prejudice as to all parties; and 

 3. This action shall immediately be remanded from the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of California to the Superior Court of the State of California in and for 

the County of Sacramento. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 22, 2007 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-01991-WBS -KJM Document 8 Filed 01/23/07 Page 4 of 4