Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00423/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00423-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

By separate order, the court will provide plaintiff an opportunity to request that

1

those documents be returned to him.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY LAMON, No. CIV S-03-0423-FCD-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

C.K. PLILER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 25, 2007, plaintiff filed a document entitled “Plaintiff’s Forced

Abandonment of His Case Due to Ongoing Interference and Reprisals by Prison Officials” (Doc.

151). With this document, plaintiff submitted to the Clerk of the Court what appears to be all of

his original documents associated with this case. 

1

The court construes plaintiff’s June 25, 2007, filing as a request for voluntary

dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). So construed, the

court will recommend that the request be granted and that this case be dismissed, without

Case 2:03-cv-00423-AK Document 160 Filed 08/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

prejudice. 

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that:

1. Plaintiff’s June 25, 2007, filing be construed as a request for voluntary

dismissal;

2. So construed, the request be granted; and

3. This action be dismissed, without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 20 days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive

the right to appeal. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 15, 2007.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-00423-AK Document 160 Filed 08/16/07 Page 2 of 2