Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01673/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01673-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-01-1673 DFL PAN P

vs.

ANA RAMIREZ PALMER, et a.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On August 2, 2006, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.

A responding party’s failure to comply with any order or with the Local Rules

“may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within

the inherent power of the Court.” L. R. 11-110. The court may recommend this action be

dismissed with or without prejudice, as appropriate, if plaintiff disobeys an order or the Local

Rules. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1252 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court did not abuse

discretion in dismissing pro se plaintiff’s complaint for failing to obey an order to re-file an

amended complaint to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d

1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for pro se plaintiff’s failure to comply with local rule

regarding notice of change of address affirmed).

Case 2:01-cv-01673-DFL-EFB Document 52 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On November 22, 2004, the court advised plaintiff of the requirements for filing

an opposition to the motion and that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a

recommendation of dismissal. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of

this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a

statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

DATED: September 28, 2006.

14

will1673.ftoppmsj

Case 2:01-cv-01673-DFL-EFB Document 52 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 2