Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_03-cv-01285/USCOURTS-azd-3_03-cv-01285-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Oliver Lee Hurley, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

William Gaspar, et al. 

 Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV03-1285-PCT-SRB

ORDER

Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

on July 7, 2003, claiming that his 1) conviction was unconstitutional, 2) his conviction was

a violation of the protection against double jeopardy, 3) ineffective assistance of trial and

appellate counsel, and 4) a violation of the privilege against self incrimination. On January

27, 2004 Respondents filed their answer to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

No reply was filed. On June 20, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and

Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied because Petitioner's claims are

procedurally defaulted and, alternatively, lack merit.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Case 3:03-cv-01285-SRB Document 23 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 23rd day of August, 2006.

Case 3:03-cv-01285-SRB Document 23 Filed 08/24/06 Page 2 of 2