Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00438/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00438-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

M. DAVID, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0438 MCE KJM P

vs.

REAVES, 

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed March 21, 2005, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma

pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that

failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day

period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an

in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file objections

to these findings and recommendations. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file

Case 2:05-cv-00438-MCE -KJM Document 6 Filed 05/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 2, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00438-MCE -KJM Document 6 Filed 05/02/05 Page 2 of 2