Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01891/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01891-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Plaintiffs did not provide the Court with a chambers copy of the Request. Although

the Court has exercised its discretion to consider the Request, plaintiffs, for future

reference, are reminded of the following provision in the Court’s Standing Orders: “In all

cases that have been assigned to the Electronic Case Filing Program, the parties are

required to provide for use in chambers one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically. The paper copy of each such document shall be delivered no later than

noon on the day after the document is filed electronically. The paper copy shall be marked

‘Chambers Copy’ and shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office in an envelope clearly marked

with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘E-Filing Chambers Copy.’

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RIAZ PATRAS,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-09-1891 MMC

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR

ASSIGNMENT TO DISCOVERY

MAGISTRATE

Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Administrative Request for Assignment to a Discovery

Magistrate, filed June 1, 2010.1 Having read and considered the Request, the Court rules

as follows.

Because a discovery motion has not been filed by any party, the Request is hereby

DENIED without prejudice. In the event that a discovery motion is filed, the Court will refer

Case 3:09-cv-01891-MMC Document 24 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

It is not the practice of the Court to refer discovery matters to a particular magistrate

judge; rather, the Clerk assigns such matters on a random basis.

2

the matter to a magistrate judge at that time.2

Upon any such referral, the assigned magistrate judge will advise the parties of the

date, time, and nature of any further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 11, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01891-MMC Document 24 Filed 06/11/10 Page 2 of 2