Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00380/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00380-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IGUACU, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTONIO CABRERA MANO FILHO,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

No. C-09-0380 RS (EMC)

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

(Docket No. 25)

The Court hereby orders Plaintiff to provide supplemental briefing in support of its ex parte

application for a right to attach order. More specifically, the Court is in need of additional briefing

with respect to the amount of consideration that ADM allegedly paid Defendant. 

For the Jatai deal, Plaintiff asserts that the total consideration paid was BRL 6,483,000

because Defendant’s e-mail represents that that was the “[p]urchase price to be received from

ADM.” Id., Ex. 5 (e-mail). Plaintiff does not count the BRL 6,000,000 listed by Defendant as

“Goodwill.” In contrast, for the Limeira deal, Plaintiff asserts that the total consideration paid was

BRL 101,868,000 -- which consists of not only the “[p]urchase price to be received from ADM” but

also the “Goodwill” (as well as another component). Plaintiff does not explain why it did not

include “Goodwill” as part of the total consideration for the Jatai deal but did include “Goodwill” as

part of the total consideration for the Limeira deal. Moreover, it is not clear what Plaintiff and/or

Defendant mean by “Goodwill” and whether it should be included as part of the consideration paid

by ADM.

Case 3:09-cv-00380-RS Document 41 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Court orders Plaintiff to provide supplemental briefing to address these two

issues -- i.e., (1) what is meant by “Goodwill” and whether it should be included as part of the

consideration and (2) why “Goodwill” was included for the consideration for the Limeira deal but

not for the Jatai deal.

This supplemental briefing shall be filed within a week of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2010

_________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00380-RS Document 41 Filed 03/22/10 Page 2 of 2