Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01000/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01000-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLEVELAND WALLACE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BUCKINGHAM PROPERTY 

MANAGEMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-1000 TLN CKD PS

ORDER

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

Calendared for hearing on January 11, 2017 is defendant’s motion to dismiss. No opposition to 

the motion has been filed. 

Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed 

fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party will 

be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the 

motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 230(i) provides that 

failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in 

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be 

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 

inherent power of the Court.”

Case 2:16-cv-01000-TLN-CKD Document 39 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of January 11, 2017 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s motion (ECF 

Nos. 38) is continued to February 15, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 24.

2. Plaintiffs shall file opposition, if any, to the motion no later than January 25, 2017. 

Failure to file opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in 

submission of the motion on the papers and a recommendation that this action be dismissed 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

3. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than February 1, 2017.

Dated: January 4, 2017

4 wallace1000.2.nop

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-01000-TLN-CKD Document 39 Filed 01/04/17 Page 2 of 2