Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-00445/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-00445-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

John Charles Loomis, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-14-00445-PHX-JAT

ORDER 

 Pending before this Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. 

(Doc. 1). The Magistrate Judge to whom this case was assigned issued a Report and 

Recommendation (R&R) recommending that this Court deny the Petition and issuance of 

a certificate of appealability. (Doc. 15). 

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R.1

 Accordingly, the Court hereby 

accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district 

courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the 

subject of an objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 

1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review 

the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but 

not otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 

1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). 

 

1

 Petitioner received an extension of time to file his objections, but the extended deadline has expired. (Doc. 21). 

Case 2:14-cv-00445-JAT Document 22 Filed 03/29/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Based on the foregoing, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 

15) is ACCEPTED; accordingly, 

$ Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and 

dismissed with prejudice, 

$ in the event Petitioner files an appeal, issuance of a certificate of 

appealability is denied, and 

$ the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice. 

 Dated this 29th day of March, 2016. 

Case 2:14-cv-00445-JAT Document 22 Filed 03/29/16 Page 2 of 2