Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-1_11-cv-00213/USCOURTS-almd-1_11-cv-00213-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DONNELL FLOURNOY, #126 385, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) 1:11-CV-213-ID

v. )

) (WO)

LORI C. INGRAM, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #8), and

Plaintiff’s Objection, (Doc. #9). Having conducted a de novo determination of those

portions of the Recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and

ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. #9) be and the same is hereby OVERRULED;

2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #8) be and the same is

hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED;

3. The Plaintiff’s § 1983 claims presented against the named Defendants be

and the same are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the

directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii);

4. The Plaintiff’s challenge to the constitutionality of his 2010 probation

revocation proceedings before the District Court of Houston County,

1

Case 1:11-cv-00213-ID-WC Document 10 Filed 04/19/11 Page 1 of 2
Alabama, be and the same is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice

pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such

challenged is not properly before the Court at this time; and

5. This case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process

in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii), and

(iii).

DONE this the 19th day of April, 2011.

/s/ Ira DeMent

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:11-cv-00213-ID-WC Document 10 Filed 04/19/11 Page 2 of 2