Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02986/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02986-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL FEUER, individually and on behalf

of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

TELIK, INC., Michael M. Wick, M.D., and

CYNTHIA BUTITTA,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-02986 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

WHY CASES SHOULD NOT 

BE CONSOLIDATED

Pursuant to the Court’s order dated July 12, 2007, the following are related cases under

Local Rule 3-12(b):

C 07-2986 WHA Feuer v. Telik, Inc.

C 07-3454 WHA Hatami v. Telik, Inc.

Any party objecting to the consolidation of these cases pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must show cause in writing no later than August 7, 2007, why

the cases should not be consolidated, together with all cases related to them in the future. Any

response to such objections must be filed no later than August 10, 2007, at which time the

matter will be deemed submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-02986-WHA Document 10 Filed 07/30/07 Page 1 of 1