Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00737/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00737-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YVONNE ZIVANIC,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A; 

ERIC DIPPEL; LISA DIPPEL; JP 

MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; 

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 

COMPANY; et al.,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 10-cv-00737-SC

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

CORRECT

Now before the Court is Defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. 

and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company's (collectively 

"Defendants") motion to correct an error in a prior order issued in 

this case. ECF No. 32 ("Mot."). Responses to Defendants' motion 

were due on February 4, 2015, but none have been filed. The Court 

will therefore treat the motion as unopposed. The Court finds that 

the motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument, 

pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b).

On May 26, 2011, the Court granted Defendants' unopposed 

motion for return of property in this matter. See ECF No. 31. The 

Case 3:10-cv-00737-SC Document 36 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

Court's order included an order that the Notice of Pendency of 

Action recorded as Document 20615884 on February 19, 2010 in the 

office of the Santa Clara County Recorder's office be expunged. 

Id. at 2. That order was in error; the correct document number is 

actually Document 20615684. The correct number is reflected in 

Defendants' motion for return of property, see ECF No. 29 at 6, 

Defendants' proposed order, see ECF No. 29-1 at 2, and the relevant 

document itself, see ECF No. 29 Ex. 7 at 1.

The error in the Court's prior order was due to a clerical 

mistake. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) permits the Court 

to "correct a clerical mistake or a mistake arising from oversight 

or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other 

part of the record." Given that every relevant document that 

Defendants provided in support of their motion indicates that the 

correct document number was indeed 20615684, and that the document 

itself reflects that number, the Court finds that its prior order 

referred to Document 20615884 as the result of simple clerical

mistake. Defendants' motion is GRANTED.

The Court ORDERS that the Notice of Pendency of Action 

recorded as document 20615684 on February 19, 2010 in the Santa

Clara County Recorder's Office is hereby expunged.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 25, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00737-SC Document 36 Filed 03/26/15 Page 2 of 2