Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01073/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01073-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE WILLARD,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF 

CORRECTIONS & 

REHABILITATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:19-cv-1073-JLT (PC)

ORDER TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE; AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO 

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 

COURT ORDER

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

The Court recently Plaintiff to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified 

copy of his prison trust account statement within forty-five days and cautioned him that failure to 

do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The forty-five-day period 

has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s order and has not filed the required 

documents. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the Clerk of the Court to assign a district judge to 

this case, and the Court RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after 

being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with 

the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed 

Case 1:19-cv-01073-DAD-JLT Document 14 Filed 01/14/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure 

to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-01073-DAD-JLT Document 14 Filed 01/14/20 Page 2 of 2