Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00958/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00958-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT – 05-00958

RMW

MAG

E-FILED on 7/26/05

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

PERLITO SULIT and ESTELA SULIT

Petitioners,

v.

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, CHARLES DEMORE,

NANCY ALCANTAR, and ALBERTO

GONZALEZ,

Respondents.

No. C-05-00958 RMW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED

TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT

[Re Docket No. 10]

Respondents have filed a notice of change inlawasserting that this court no longer hasjurisdictionover

the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus. They contend that this case must be transferred to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pursuant to the recently passed REALID Act of 2005, Pub. L.

No. 109-13, Div. B, §§ 106(a), (c), 119 Stat. 231 (2005). The court has not yet heard petitioner's position

on this issue. 

The partiesshallmeet and confer regarding whether this case must be transferred to the NinthCircuit.

Should the parties agree that transfer is appropriate, they shall submit a stipulation and proposed order to do

so. If the parties disagree, they shall submit a stipulation and proposed order setting deadlines for filing an

Case 5:05-cv-00958-RMW Document 12 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT – 05-00958

RMW

MAG 2

opposition brief by petitioners and a reply brief by respondents. In either case, the parties shall file their

stipulation and proposed order by Monday, August 22, 2005.

DATED: 7/25/05 /s/ Ronald M. Whyte

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-00958-RMW Document 12 Filed 07/26/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT – 05-00958

RMW

MAG 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff(s):

James Todd Bennett bennettjt13@hotmail.com

Counsel for Defendant(s):

Edward A. Olsen edward.olsen@usdoj.gov 

Alison E. Daw alison.daw@usdoj.gov 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for

e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 7/26/05 /s/ MAG

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:05-cv-00958-RMW Document 12 Filed 07/26/05 Page 3 of 3