Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_08-cv-08028/USCOURTS-azd-3_08-cv-08028-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgment

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Though oral argument was requested on the Motion, because the parties submitted

memoranda discussing the law and evidence in support of their positions and oral argument

would not have aided the Court’s decisional process, the Court will not set oral argument.

See e.g., Partridge v. Reich, 141 F.3d 920, 926 (9th Cir. 1998).

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Salt River Project Agricultural

Improvement and Power District, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Reynold R. Lee; et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-8028-PCT-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff SRP’s Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend

Judgment (Doc. #91). The Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration to the

limited extent to make clear that the Court did not order the Secretary of the Interior to decide

the dispute between SRP and the Defendants. Rather, the Court ordered that if the Plaintiff

chooses to pursue its action, it must do so before the Secretary of the Interior, as set out in

the 1969 Lease. The Court denies the Rule 59(e) Motion (Doc. #91) in all other respects.1

DATED this 11th day of March, 2009.

Case 3:08-cv-08028-JAT Document 105 Filed 03/11/09 Page 1 of 1