Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00686/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00686-67/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

375371.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING

CERTAIN DISCOVERY DEADLINES C05 00686 SBA (EMC)

MARTIN R. GLICK (No. 40187)

Email: mglick@howardrice.com

BOBBIE J. WILSON (No. 148317)

Email: bwilson@howardrice.com

HOWHOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY

FALK & RABKIN

A Professional Corporation

Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4024

Telephone: 415/434-1600

Facsimile: 415/217-5910

MORTON AMSTER (pro hac vice)

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO (pro hac vice)

KENNETH M. BERNSTEIN (pro hac vice)

CHARLES R. MACEDO (pro hac vice)

AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN, LLP

90 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10016

Telephone: 212/336-8000

Facsimile: 212/336-8001

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs

VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD. and JVC

COMPONENTS (THAILAND) CO., LTD., and Defendants

AGILIS INC. and AGILIS TECHNOLOGY INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

NIDEC CORPORATION

Plaintiff,

v.

VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD., JVC

COMPONENTS (THAILAND) CO., LTD.,

AGILIS INC., and AGILIS TECHNOLOGY

INC.,

Defendants,

NIDEC AMERICA CORPORATION and

NIDEC SINGAPORE PTE, LTD.,

Additional Defendants on

the Counterclaims.

Case No. C05 00686 SBA (EMC)

Action Filed: February 15, 2005

E-Filing

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONCERNING CERTAIN

DISCOVERY DEADLINES

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 762 Filed 07/25/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

375371.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING

CERTAIN DISCOVERY DEADLINES C05 00686 SBA (EMC)

-1-

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12 of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings

before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the parties declare

that:

WHEREAS the stipulated discovery schedule below modifies certain discovery deadlines, it

does not change the deadlines for dispositive motions, the pretrial conference or trial or otherwise

modify the Order for Pretrial Preparation [D.I. 283] executed by Judge Armstrong on October 25,

2006.

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to modify the discovery deadlines for the limited items

provided below.

The parties stipulate to an order providing the following:

1. Nidec will provide one or more Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses to testify on the topics set forth

in JVC’s July 20, 2007 Notice of Deposition.

2. The foregoing shall not be construed as an admission by either party for the purposes of

precedent or argument in any other case and shall not be used by any party to argue that the trial

date, as set forth in the Order for Pretrial Preparation [D.I. 283], should be altered.

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

Dated: July 20, 2007 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

FRANKLIN BROCKWAY GOWDY

THOMAS D. KOHLER

DAVID C. BOHRER

MICHAEL J. LYONS

DION M. BREGMAN

By: /S/

Lorraine Casto

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant

NIDEC CORPORATION and Additional

Defendants NIDEC AMERICA

CORPORATION and NIDEC SINGAPORE

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 762 Filed 07/25/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

375371.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING

CERTAIN DISCOVERY DEADLINES C05 00686 SBA (EMC)

-2-

Dated: July 20, 2007 HOWARD RICK NEMEROVSKI CANADY

FALK & RABKIN

MARTIN R. GLICK, SBN 40187

BOBBIE J. WILSON SBN 148317

AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP

MORTON AMSTER (pro hac vice)

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO (pro hac vice)

KENNETH M. BERNSTEIN (pro hac vice)

CHARLES R. MACEDO (pro hac vice)

By: /S/

Anthony F. Lo Cicero

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs

VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD. and

JVC COMPONENTS (THAILAND) CO., LTD

and Defendants AGILIS INC., and AGILIS

TECHNOLOGY INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

July 25, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 762 Filed 07/25/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

375371.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING

CERTAIN DISCOVERY DEADLINES C05 00686 SBA (EMC)

-3-

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I, Anthony F.

Lo Cicero, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the

other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America

that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 20th day of July 2007, at New York, New York.

/S/

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 762 Filed 07/25/07 Page 4 of 4