Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03072/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03072-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION REGARDING 

DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

NO. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053)

redwards@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

BRIAN C. ANDERSON (S.B. #126539) 

banderson@omm.com 

SCOTT M. HAMMACK (pro hac vice) 

shammack@omm.com 

DAVID R. DOREY (S.B. #286843) 

ddorey@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

1625 Eye Street, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20006-4001 

Tеlephone: (202) 383-5300 

Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER 

LITIGATION 

Case No. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING MODIFICATIONS TO 

CERTAIN DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

[N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-11] 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 188 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 5
- 1 - 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

NO. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, the fact discovery deadline in this matter was December 9, 2015, and the 

time to raise any discovery disputes about that discovery is December 16, 2015; 

WHEREAS, this Court, pursuant to stipulation, extended that fact discovery deadline only 

for certain specific purposes: for Plaintiffs to take two additional depositions, and for Ford to 

complete its privilege review (see ECF No. 186); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs provided initial discovery responses to certain interrogatories and 

supplemental responses to other, prior interrogatories on December 9, 2015, and, following the 

parties’ discussions have requested additional time to complete further their responses to Ford’s 

interrogatories in light of the foregoing extensions and other discussions; 

WHEREAS, the amount of fact discovery exchanged in the litigation has been particularly 

voluminous, both in terms of millions of pages of documents and dozens of depositions; 

WHEREAS, Ford and Plaintiffs have been working together cooperatively to complete 

the fact discovery process in this litigation, and Ford and Plaintiffs have resolved nearly all 

discovery issues without need for this Court’s intervention; 

WHEREAS, none of the various deadline extensions stipulated by Ford and Plaintiffs will 

require any change to the dates set for trial of the matter; 

WHEREAS, execution of this Stipulation is not a waiver of any claims or defenses 

Plaintiffs or Ford otherwise may have; 

WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-11 permits a party to seek miscellaneous administrative relief 

pursuant to a stipulation by the parties; 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Ford, through their 

counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows: 

1. The deadline for Plaintiffs to submit supplemental responses to Ford’s 

interrogatories is extended to January 13, 2016; 

2. The deadline for Plaintiffs to submit additional supplemental responses, if any, to 

Ford’s interrogatories, based on any information learned or received after the date 

of this stipulation, is extended to January 25, 2016; 

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 188 Filed 12/23/15 Page 2 of 5
- 2 - 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

NO. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3. The deadline for Ford and Plaintiffs to file a jointly-signed letter1 regarding any 

disputes previously raised by the parties about Plaintiffs’ responses to Ford’s 

interrogatories, or about any of Plaintiffs’ upcoming supplemental responses, is 

extended to January 29, 2016. 

4. All other discovery deadlines in this case shall remain the same. 

Dated: December 16, 2015 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Randall W. Edwards_____________ 

 Randall W. Edwards 

Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company 

 

1

 Pursuant to Magistrate Judge James’s Discovery Standing Order. 

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 188 Filed 12/23/15 Page 3 of 5
- 3 - 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

NO. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: December 16, 2015 GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 

By: /s/ Kyle McGee________________ 

 Kyle McGee 

Steve W. Berman 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

1918 8th Avenue, Suite 3300 

Seattle, Washington 98101 

Tel: (206) 623-7292 

Fax: (206) 623-0594 

steve@hbsslaw.com 

Adam J. Levitt 

GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 

30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1200 

Chicago, Illinois 60602 

Tel: (312) 214-0000 

Fax: (312) 214-0001 

alevitt@gelaw.com 

Roland Tellis (186269) 

Mark Pifko (228412) 

BARON & BUDD, P.C. 

15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1600 

Encino, California 91436 

Tel: (818) 839-2320 

Fax: (818) 986-9698 

rtellis@baronbudd.com 

mpifko@baronbudd.com 

Joseph G. Sauder (pro hac vice) 

Matthew D. Schelkopf (pro hac vice) 

CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP 

One Haverford Centre 

361 West Lancaster Avenue 

Haverford, Pennsylvania 19041 

Tel: (610) 642-8500 

Fax: (610) 649-3633 

JGS@chimicles.com 

MDS@chimicles.com 

Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 188 Filed 12/23/15 Page 4 of 5
- 4 - 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

NO. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FILER’S ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose 

behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. 

Dated: December 16, 2015 Randall W. Edwards 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Randall W. Edwards 

 Randall W. Edwards 

Attorney for Defendant Ford Motor Company 

O R D E R 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: December __, 2015 

 The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

 United States District Judge 

23

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 188 Filed 12/23/15 Page 5 of 5