Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02254/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02254-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7378414.1 CASE NO. C06-02254 RMW 

HOWARD HOLDERNESS 

THOMAS R. GREEN 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: 415.442.1000 

Facsimile: 415.442.1001 

E-mail: tgreen@morganlewis.com 

E-mail: hholderness@morganlewis.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

Michael Brothers, On Behalf of Himself 

and all Other Similarly Situated 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Hewlett-Packard Company, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 06-02254 RMW 

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD CO. 

TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to the abovecaptioned matter, and by and between their undersigned counsel, that: 

1. On March 29, 2006, Plaintiff filed a complaint in the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of California to initiate the case Michael Brothers, On Behalf of Himself 

and all Others Similarly Situated v. Hewlett-Packard Co., Case No. C 06-2254 PVT (the 

“Complaint”). 

2. On June 1, 2006, the parties stipulated and agreed that Hewlett-Packard 

Company’s (“HP”) deadline to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint would be 

extended to from June 6, 2006 to June 13, 2006. 

Case 5:06-cv-02254-RMW Document 13 Filed 06/15/06 Page 1 of 2
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7378414.1 2 CASE NO. C06-02254 RMW 

3. The parties further stipulated and agreed that if HP files a motion to dismiss the 

Complaint, Plaintiff’s deadline to file an opposition to said motion to dismiss shall be extended to 

July 28, 2006. 

4. This extension of time will not negatively impact any hearings, conferences or 

other dates that have been set by the Court. 

5. The filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document 

has been obtained from the other signatory. 

Dated: June 2, 2006 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

By_______/s/______________________ 

Howard Holderness 

Thomas R. Green 

Attorneys for Defendant 

 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 

Dated: June 2, 2006 GREEN WELLING LLP 

by_______/s/______________________ 

Jenelle Welling 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

MICHAEL BROTHERS 

ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company’s time to answer, 

move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter is extended to June 13, 2006. 

DATED: June ___, 2006 _________________________________ 

 Judge of the District Court 

Case 5:06-cv-02254-RMW Document 13 Filed 06/15/06 Page 2 of 2