Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01797/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01797-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAMARAH R. SEIELSTAD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

AEGIS SENIOR COMMUNITIES, LLC,

Defendant /

No. C-09-1797 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF

DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On January 14, 2010, plaintiff electronically filed a Second Amended Class-Action

Complaint. Plaintiff has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders,

however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day

following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document

that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the

judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45

§ VI.G; see also Standing Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the Honorable Maxine M.

Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if she fails in the future to comply with General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each

Case 3:09-cv-01797-MMC Document 36 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

electronically-filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01797-MMC Document 36 Filed 01/22/10 Page 2 of 2