Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01240/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01240-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KENNETH MOORE, JR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CDCR DIRECTOR, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:12-cv-01240 AC P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

By order filed August 2, 2012, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and he was granted 

leave to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days. ECF No. 6. Twenty-eight days 

from that date have long since passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or 

otherwise responded to the court’s order. No documents have been filed in this case, nor any 

correspondence received from plaintiff, since the motion to proceed in forma pauperis which was 

filed on June 27, 2012 (prior to the appointment of the undersigned.) The court also notes that the 

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation website indicates that plaintiff’s address 

of record is no longer accurate. The Clerk of the Court will be directed to mail a copy of this 

order to the plaintiff’s address as listed on the California Department of Corrections and 

Rehabilitation website. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. 

Case 2:12-cv-01240-JAM-AC Document 10 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

2. In addition to mailing a copy of this order to plaintiff at his address of record, the Clerk 

of the Court shall mail a copy to plaintiff at the following address: California Men’s Colony, P.O. 

Box 8103, San Luis Obispo, CA 93409-8103. 

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for 

failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: April 15, 2015 

Case 2:12-cv-01240-JAM-AC Document 10 Filed 04/16/15 Page 2 of 2