Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03336/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03336-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIVECAREER LTD,

Plaintiff,

v.

SU JIA TECHNOLOGIES LTD., DBA 

RESUMEGENIUS.COM, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-03336-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 7/10/15

Fact discovery cut-off 3/11/16

Expert disclosures 4/1/16

Expert rebuttal 4/22/16

Expert discovery cut-off 5/6/16

Deadline to file dispositive motions 5/27/16

Pretrial conference statement due 8/9/16

Pretrial conference 8/19/16 at 2:00 p.m.

Trial 9/12/16 at 8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) Eight

Case 3:14-cv-03336-JST Document 60 Filed 03/31/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The Court sets a further case management conference on June 3, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. A joint 

case management statement is due by May 20, 2015. In their meet-and-confer efforts and joint 

case management statement, the parties are encouraged to focus particular attention on the most 

effective means of alternative dispute resolution, because the Court will determine an appropriate 

ADR means and deadline at the June 3 conference. 

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31, 2015

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-03336-JST Document 60 Filed 03/31/15 Page 2 of 2