Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06132/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06132-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 09:0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE CONSOLIDATED 

1 Civil Case No.: C-07-06132-MP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Simon J. Frankel, SB # 171552 

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 

One Front Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 591-6000 

Facsimile: (415) 591-6091 

sfrankel@cov.com 

EUGENE D. GULLAND (pro hac vice application pending) 

DONALD J. RIDINGS JR. (pro hac vice application pending) 

Covington & Burling LLP 

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20004-2401 

Tel: (202) 662-6000 

Fax: (202) 662-6291 

Attorneys for Defendant 

KYOCERA CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTHONY N. LAPINE, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

KYOCERA CORPORATION, 

 Defendant. 

Civil Case No.: 3:07-cv-06132-MP 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE SINGLE 

CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM 

ADDRESSING TWO MOTIONS IN 

EXCESS OF 25 PAGES 

Hon. Marilyn H. Patel 

MEMORANDUM ADDRESSING TWO MOTIONS IN 

EXCESS OF 25 PAGES

Case 3:07-cv-06132-MHP Document 28 Filed 03/04/08 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CONSOLIDATED 

2 Civil Case No.: C-07-06132-MP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Upon consideration of defendant/cross-movant Kyocera Corporation’s 

Administrative Motion for Leave to File Single Consolidated Memorandum Addressing Two 

Motions in Excess of 25 Pages, any opposition thereto, and any reply, it is ORDERED that 

Kyocera’s motion is GRANTED. Kyocera is hereby granted leave to file a consolidated 

memorandum, not to exceed 36 pages, in support of its Cross-Motion to Confirm Arbitral 

Award and in opposition to plaintiff’s December 4, 2007 Motion to Vacate Arbitral Award. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

________________________________ _____________________ 

United States District Judge Date 

MEMORANDUM ADDRESSING TWO MOTIONS IN 

EXCESS OF 25 PAGES 

3/3/2008

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:07-cv-06132-MHP Document 28 Filed 03/04/08 Page 2 of 2