Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00242/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00242-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD I. SOFOWARA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

ALBERT GONZALES, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:06-cv-00242-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 19)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On August 25, 2006, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the petition be GRANTED

and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for RIPENESS. (Doc. 19). The

Report and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were

to be filed within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. On September 12, 2006,

Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 20). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

Case 1:06-cv-00242-OWW -TAG Document 21 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation issued August 25, 2006 (Doc. 19), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 23, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00242-OWW -TAG Document 21 Filed 09/26/06 Page 2 of 2