Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00700/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00700-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Withdrawing Petitioner’s Motion For Leave to File Third Amd. Complaint, etc. 

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

ROBERT R. ANDERSON

Chief Assistant Attorney General

MARY JO GRAVES

Senior Assistant Attorney General

STEPHEN G. HERNDON

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

CRAIG S. MEYERS, State Bar No. 178350

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 324-5280

Fax: (916) 324-2960

Email: Craig.Meyers@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Respondent 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EASTERN DIVISION

STEVEN ANTHONY GUZMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

A. LAMARQUE, Warden,

Respondent.

CIV-S-04-0700 FCD GGH P

STIPULATION AND ORDER

WITHDRAWING

PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD

AMENDED PETITION AND

TO STAY PROCEEDINGS;

GRANTING PETITIONER 30

DAYS TO FILE TRAVERSE

STIPULATION

On April 20, 2006, counsel for petitioner filed a “Request For Extension Of Time To File

Traverse And For Permission To File A Third Amended Petition, Then To Stay & Abey Proceedings

Pending Exhaustion Of State Court Remedies.” On April 26, 2006, counsel for petitioner agreed to

re-notice her motion until July 27, 2006, to await the outcome of the Supreme Court’s ruling in

Clark v. Arizona (cert. granted Dec. 5, 2005, No. 05-5966).

/ / /

Clark v. Arizona, --- S.Ct. ----, 2006 WL 1764372 (U.S.Ariz., June 29, 2006) was decided

Case 2:04-cv-00700-FCD-GGH Document 29 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Withdrawing Petitioner’s Motion For Leave to File Third Amd. Complaint, etc. 

2

today against Petitioner’s proposed new claim. Counsel discussed the Clark case today and counsel

for petitioner requested that counsel for respondent file this stipulation.

In light of the Clark case, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE that petitioner’s motion

scheduled for July 27, 2006, be withdrawn. 

The parties FURTHER STIPULATE that the time for petitioner to file his traverse may

be extended until July 31, 2006

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 29, 2006 BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

 /S/ CRAIG S. MEYERS

 BY:__________________________________

Craig S. Meyers

Attorneys for Respondent

Dated: June 29, 2006

 /S/ MARY LOU HILLBERG

__________________________________

Mary Lou Hillberg

Attorney for Petitioner 

ORDER

Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, it is HEREBY

ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to stay and amend, scheduled for July 27, 2006, is withdrawn

and taken off calendar. Petitioner’s traverse shall be filed no later than July 31, 2006

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated:7/5/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

__________________________________

HON. GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

United States Magistrate Judge

guzm0700.po3.wpd

SA2004FH0104

Case 2:04-cv-00700-FCD-GGH Document 29 Filed 07/05/06 Page 2 of 2