Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_11-cv-00810/USCOURTS-azd-4_11-cv-00810-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Marvin Hollie Jr, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-810-TUC-FRZ (JR)

ORDER

Before the Court for consideration is Petitioner Marvin Hollie Jr.’s Petition for Writ

of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LRCiv 72.1 and 72.2, Rules of Practice of the

United States District Court for the District of Arizona, this matter was referred to Magistrate

Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau for further proceedings and report and recommendation.

Magistrate Judge Rateau issued her Report and Recommendation on February 11,

2013, recommending that the District Court, after its independent review, dismiss with

prejudice Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as untimely under the one-year

statute of limitations pursuant to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996

(“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances or a

basis for equitable tolling. The Report and Recommendation sets forth the factual and

procedural history of the underlying state proceedings. 

The Report and Recommendation further advised the parties that they may serve and

file written objections, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), within 14 days

Case 4:11-cv-00810-FRZ Document 16 Filed 03/08/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

of being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation, and if objections were not

timely filed, they may be deemed waived. 

No objections were filed.

The Court finds, after consideration of the matters presented and an independent

review of the record herein, that the Report and Recommendation shall be adopted and the

Petition will be denied and this action dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is hereby

ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is

DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment be entered accordingly.

DATED this 7th day of March, 2013.

Case 4:11-cv-00810-FRZ Document 16 Filed 03/08/13 Page 2 of 2