Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00859/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00859-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD DENNIS GAMACHE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0859 RRB PAN P

vs.

BRETT WILLIAMS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed March 27, 2006, plaintiff’s second amended complaint was

dismissed and thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. By order filed

May 3, 2006, plaintiff was given an additional thirty days in which to file a third amended

complaint. That thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a third amended

complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:04-cv-00859-RRB -PAN Document 58 Filed 06/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 13, 2006.

12

gama0859.fta

Case 2:04-cv-00859-RRB -PAN Document 58 Filed 06/14/06 Page 2 of 2