Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01022/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01022-72/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Troas V. Barnett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this action. On January 22, 2013, a jury trial was held in this matter against Defendants 

Martin Gamboa, Angel Duran and Manuel Torres (“Defendants”). On January 24, 2013, the jury 

rendered a special verdict in favor of the Defendants, and judgment was entered in their favor on 

January 30, 2013. (ECF Nos. 287, 289.) 

On February 6, 2013, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal, which was processed to the Ninth 

Circuit Court of Appeals. (ECF Nos. 290, 292.) Thereafter, on February 11, 2013, Plaintiff moved 

for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. (ECF No. 295.) Defendants filed an 

opposition to the motion for new trial on February 25, 2013. (ECF No. 298.) Plaintiff replied on 

March 8, 2013. (ECF No. 301.) 

On April 11, 2013, during the pendency of Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, the Ninth Circuit 

Court of Appeals issued an order indicating that Plaintiff’s appellate proceedings would be held in 

TROAS V. BARNETT,

 Plaintiff,

v.

MARTIN GAMBOA, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:05-cv-01022-BAM PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW THE RULE 59 MOTION IN THE 

DISTRICT COURT

(ECF No. 306)

Case 1:05-cv-01022-BAM Document 307 Filed 05/09/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

abeyance pending the district court’s resolution of Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. (ECF No. 305.) 

Following the Ninth Circuit’s order, Plaintiff filed the instant motion to withdraw his Rule 59 motion

on April 22, 2013. 

Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his Rule 59 motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is 

therefore directed to terminate Plaintiff’s Rule 59 motion filed on February 11, 2013. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 9, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

10c20kb8554

Case 1:05-cv-01022-BAM Document 307 Filed 05/09/13 Page 2 of 2