Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01062/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01062-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESTATE OF LITRISHA YOLANDA CASE NO. CV-F-05-1062 LJO SMS

LILLY, et. al,

Plaintiffs, ORDER ON STIPULATION TO VACATE

vs. SCHEDULING ORDER AND

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS

ED ALAMEIDA, JR., et. al,

Defendants.

 /

The Court has received and reviewed the Stipulation and Proposed Order to vacate the

scheduling order and stay the proceedings (Doc. 66) and the Ex Parte Substitution of Plaintiffs in Pro

per for counsel of record. (Doc. 67.)

The parties seek to vacate all dates and stay the proceedings while new counsel is obtained. Trial

in this matter is scheduled for November 12, 2008 with the pretrial conference is set for September 15,

2008. The Court does not find good cause to vacate the dates and stay the proceedings. The trial date

is over a year away. Accordingly, the stipulation to vacate the scheduling order and stay the proceedings

is DENIED.

Plaintiffs also submit an ex parte substitution of plaintiffs in prop per for counsel. The ex parte

application seeks to substitute Debra Luck, for herself in propria persona, and also substitute Ms. Luck

for the minor-plaintiffs, Joshua Lilly and Jeremy Lilly (for whom Ms. Luck is guardian ad litem), and

for the Estate of Latrisha Lilly. While Ms. Luck may represent herself, counsel must appear for the

minors and the Estate. Accordingly, the ex parte substitution is GRANTED as to Debra Luck,

individually, and DENIED as to the remaining plaintiffs.

Case 1:05-cv-01062-LJO -SMS Document 68 Filed 09/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Counsel for plaintiff should inform the Court whether or not she is staying in the case to

represent the minors and the Estate. If she is not, new counsel must be in place for the minors and the

Estate within 20 calendar days. The absence of fulfilling this requirement will result in a dismissal of

the minors’ claims without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01062-LJO -SMS Document 68 Filed 09/26/07 Page 2 of 2