Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01513/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01513-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOAQUIN N’GE WRIGHT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1513 EFB P 

vs.

ANGUZZA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff’s consent. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 

Plaintiff’s declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). 

Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect

and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(b)(1) and (2).

////

////

Case 2:09-cv-01513-EFB Document 5 Filed 02/22/10 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed plaintiff’s complaint and, for the limited purposes of § 1915A

screening, finds that it states a cognizable Eight Amendment claim against defendant Anguzza. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

The complaint does not state a cognizable claim against defendant Department of

Corrections, as the Department of Corrections is not a “person” under § 1983. Will v. Michigan

Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989); see also Allison v. California Adult Authority, 419

F.2d 822, 823 (9th Cir. 1969) (state agency such as San Quentin State Prison is not a person

within meaning of Civil Rights Act). This defect in plaintiff’s claim cannot be cured by

amendment, thus, plaintiff is not entitled to leave to amend to state a claim against the

Department of Corrections.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 

2. Plaintiff shall pay the statutory filing fee of $350. All payments shall be collected in

accordance with the notice to the Director of the California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith. 

3. Service is appropriate for defendant Anguzza.

4. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant California Department of Corrections are

dismissed without leave to amend.

5. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, an

instruction sheet and one copy of the June 2, 2009 pleading.

6. Within 30 days from service of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice

of Submission of Documents and submit it to the court with the completed summons and USM285 form and two copies of the endorsed June 2, 2009 pleading.

////

////

////

Case 2:09-cv-01513-EFB Document 5 Filed 02/22/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

7. Upon receipt of the necessary materials, the court will direct the United States

Marshal to serve defendant Anguzza pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without

payment of costs. Failure to comply with this order may result in this action being dismissed. 

Dated: February 22, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-01513-EFB Document 5 Filed 02/22/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOAQUIN N’GE WRIGHT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1513 EFB P 

vs.

ANGUZZA, et al.,

Defendants. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court’s order

filed :

 1 completed summons form

 1 completed forms USM-285 

 2 copies of the June 2, 2009 Complaint

Dated: 

 

 Plaintiff

Case 2:09-cv-01513-EFB Document 5 Filed 02/22/10 Page 4 of 4