Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00069/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00069-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 42:1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

Troy A. Schell, Esq. (SBN 208661)

Bryan Wong, Esq. (SBN 205573)

3300 East Guasti Road, 3rd Floor

Ontario, California 91761

Telephone: (909) 235-4400

Facsimile: (909) 235-4419

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Prime Healthcare Services – Shasta, LLC,

d.b.a Shasta Regional Medical Center

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

PHILIP A. SCARBOROUGH

JOSEPH B. FRUEH

Assistant United States Attorneys

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

E-mail: philip.scarborough@usdoj.gov

joseph.frueh@usdoj.gov

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900

Attorneys for Defendant

TOM PRICE

Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES –

SHASTA LLC, a Delaware limited liability 

company doing business as Shasta Regional 

Medical Center,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

TOM PRICE, in his official capacity as 

Secretary of the Department of Health and 

Human Services,

 Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-CV-00069-TLN-KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE 

DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO THE 

COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv-00069-TLN-KJN Document 11 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 2
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE 

DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services – Shasta, 

LLC, and Defendant Tom Price, through their undersigned counsel and subject to Court approval, that 

the deadline for Defendant’s response to the Complaint be continued until after the Court issues a 

decision on Defendant’s Motion for Stay of Proceedings (ECF No. 9), which is scheduled to be heard on 

April 20, 2017. Defendant’s response to the Complaint is currently due on April 17, 2017.

Specifically, the parties stipulate that, subject to Court approval, Defendant shall file his response 

to the Complaint within 30 days of the date of an order denying Defendant’s Motion, or within 30 days 

of the date of an order lifting the requested stay of proceedings, whichever is applicable.

Neither trial nor any other date has been scheduled in this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16, and the parties have not previously requested a continuance.

Dated: March 23, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Joseph B. Frueh

JOSEPH B. FRUEH

PHILIP A. SCARBOROUGH

Assistant United States Attorneys

Attorneys for Defendant

TOM PRICE

Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services

TROY A. SCHELL, ESQ.

BRYAN WONG, ESQ.

By: /s/ Bryan Wong (authorized on 3/22/2017)

Bryan Wong, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Prime Healthcare Services – Shasta, LLC

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 24, 2017

Case 2:17-cv-00069-TLN-KJN Document 11 Filed 03/27/17 Page 2 of 2