Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-01230/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-01230-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. 11-01230 RS 

Stephen Gardner (pro hac vice) 

STANLEY LAW GROUP

6116 N. Central Expy., Ste. 1500

Dallas, Texas 75206

Telephone: (214) 443-4300 

Facsimile: (214) 443-0358 

Email: steve@consumerhelper.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DEE HENSLEY-MACLEAN, et al. 

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP

Trenton H. Norris (SBN 164781)

trent.norris@aporter.com

Monty Agarwal (SBN 191568)

monty.agarwal@aporter.com

Jonathan L. Koenig (SBN 281737)

jonathan.koenig@aporter.com

Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 

Telephone: (415) 471-3100 

Facsimile: (415) 471-3400 

Attorneys for Defendant

SAFEWAY INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DEE HENSLEY-MACLEAN, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

SAFEWAY INC., et al,

Defendant. 

Case No.: 11-01230 RS 

CLASS ACTION

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING THE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULES FOR DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS 

CERTIFICATION

Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg

Dept.: 3 - 17th Floor

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties respectfully submit this Joint Stipulation and 

[Proposed] Order Extending the Briefing Schedules for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion 

for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification.

Case 3:11-cv-01230-RS Document 180 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 -

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. 11-01230 RS

On January 26, 2015, Safeway filed its Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary 

Judgment (Dkt. # 165)(“Defendant’s Motion”), which challenges Plaintiffs’ standing to bring this 

suit. On February 10, 2015, the Court entered the parties’ stipulation extending the briefing 

schedule for Defendant’s Motion and providing that briefing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class 

Certification would trail the Court’s ruling on Defendant’s Motion. Although both parties approved 

the prior stipulation, Plaintiffs inadvertently agreed to incorrect dates. Plaintiffs have indicated that 

they will be sending subpoenas two non-parties for discovery and will need additional time to do so. 

Moreover, in the prior stipulation, the parties requested a hearing date of April 30, 2015. The 

Court, however, has set the hearing for Defendant’s Motion for May 14, 2015, a date on which 

counsel for Defendant is regrettably unavailable. The parties now propose the following 

modifications to the Court’s prior schedule: 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment. 

(1) Plaintiffs’ Opposition due on March 26, 2015;

(2) Defendant’s Reply due April 23, 2015;

(3) Hearing on May 21, 2015, subject to the Court’s availability. 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. 

(1) Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, if necessary, to be due twenty days after the

Court issues an order ruling on Safeway’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary 

Judgment. 

(2) Safeway’s opposition due within 21 days of Plaintiffs’ motion.

(3) Plaintiffs’ reply due within 21 days of Safeway’s opposition.

(4) Hearing set for the first available hearing date following Plaintiffs’ reply or at the date 

most convenient to the Court. 

 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Respectfully submitted, 

Case 3:11-cv-01230-RS Document 180 Filed 02/13/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 3 -

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. 11-01230 RS

STANLEY LAW GROUP ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 

By: /s/ Stephen Gardner 

Stephen Gardner 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

By: /s/ Monty Agarwal

Monty Agarwal 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SAFEWAY INC. 

ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from each 

of the signatories on this e-filed document. 

Dated: February 13, 2015 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 

By: /s/ Monty Agarwal 

Monty Agarwal 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

HON. RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

2/13/2015

Case 3:11-cv-01230-RS Document 180 Filed 02/13/15 Page 3 of 3