Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-332/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL No. 1917 

Case No. C-07-5944-SC 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

This Order Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS 

 A trial is currently set in these matters beginning on Monday, 

March 9, 2015. Based on the Court's review of the pending 

motions, that date is no longer feasible. Accordingly, the trial 

date, pre-trial conference, and all outstanding pre-trial deadlines 

are hereby VACATED. The deadlines for motions in limine and 

Daubert motions set forth in the scheduling stipulation, ECF No. 

2459, shall remain in effect. 

 The Court ORDERS as follows: 

 The parties shall appear for a status conference and trial 

setting at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San 

Francisco Courthouse on Friday, August 7, 2015. Prior to 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3515 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

the conference the parties shall meet and confer and file 

no less than one week prior to the conference a joint case 

management statement outlining the present status of these 

actions, proposing mutually agreeable trial dates and pretrial deadlines, and listing the actions requiring remand 

to their original districts under Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg 

Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26 (1998), including 

the case number, judicial district, and (if applicable) 

division to which the action must be transferred for trial. 

 At his convenience, the Special Master shall produce a 

report and any recommendations necessary regarding the 

status and/or scheduling of any pending or forthcoming 

class action settlements requiring the Court's approval. 

 The motion to modify the schedule for pre-trial exchanges, 

ECF No. 3150, is DENIED as moot. Given the likelihood that 

circumstances will materially change prior to trial, the 

motion for separate trials, ECF No. 2897, is DENIED with 

leave to refile once the status of the actions to be tried 

is clearer. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Dated: February 9, 2015 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3515 Filed 02/09/15 Page 2 of 2