Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01799/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01799-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW CEJAS, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1799 LKK GGH P

vs.

LOU BLANAS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 11, 2006, the district court denied plaintiff’s request for

reconsideration of this court’s October 11, 2005, order construing this action as a civil rights

action rather than a habeas corpus petition. The district court ordered plaintiff to file a complaint

within thirty days of the January 11, 2006, order.

On January 20, 2006, plaintiff filed an interlocutory appeal of the January 11,

2006, order. Thirty days passed from the January 11, 2006, order and plaintiff did not file a

complaint.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01799-LKK -GGH Document 15 Filed 04/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Although plaintiff has appealed the January 11, 2006, order to the Ninth Circuit

Court of Appeals, these proceedings are not stayed. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Plaintiff must still

comply with the order directing him to file a complaint even though he has appealed the January

11, 2006, order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted thirty days from

the date of this order to file a complaint.

DATED: 4/4/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:kj

cej1799.ord

 

Case 2:05-cv-01799-LKK -GGH Document 15 Filed 04/04/06 Page 2 of 2