Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02559/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02559-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID RAY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2559 LKK KJM P

vs.

CSP-SOLANO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of

civil rights under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Three matters are before the court.

First, plaintiff has filed several requests for discovery. Plaintiff is informed that

discovery requests between the parties shall not be filed with the court unless, and until, they are

at issue. All of the discovery requests and responses filed by plaintiff will be disregarded. 

Plaintiff has filed a motion asking that defendant Solomon be held in default

because he has not answered or otherwise pled. The record shows that defendant Solomon

appeared in this action on April 20, 2006, a little over a month before plaintiff brought his

motion. Plaintiff’s motion will be denied. 

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02559-LKK -KJM Document 77 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Finally, plaintiff asks that the court respond to plaintiff’s interrogatories and

requests for production of documents directed at defendant Parker because Parker is now

deceased. This is not a proper request. It will be denied. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The following items filed by plaintiff shall be placed in the court’s file and

disregarded: July 13, 2006 responses to defendants’ discovery requests; August 1, 2006 “Motion

To Request Interrogatories;” August 1, 2006 “Motion For Request For Production Of

Documents;” August 1, 2006 “Motion For Request For Admissions By The Defendants;”

September 11, 2006 “Motion For Request For Admissions From Defendant Solomon;” and

September 11, 2006 “Motion For Request For Admissions From Defendant Rohrer.” Plaintiff is

cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of

court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that

this action be dismissed. 

2. Plaintiff’s May 26, 2006 request that defendant Solomon be held in default is

denied.

3. Plaintiff’s September 11, 2006 “Motion Requesting That The Court Review

The Deceased Dr. Robert Parker; Medical Records . . .” is denied.

DATED: October 4, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1/mp

will2559.411(4)

Case 2:04-cv-02559-LKK -KJM Document 77 Filed 10/05/06 Page 2 of 2