Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00757/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00757-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 14, 2013, the Court granted Plaintiff an additional 

30 days from the date of service of the Order to amend his complaint or notify the Court whether he 

wished to proceed on his cognizable claims. (Doc. 20). When the Court did not receive either the 

amended complaint or a notification whether Plaintiff wished to proceed on the cognizable claims, the 

Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the matter should not be dismissed. (Doc. 21)

On July 3, 2012, Plaintiff wrote to the Court and reported he prepared an amended complaint 

and believes that the Court misfiled it in another of Plaintiff’s cases (Rodriquez v. Tilton, Case # 2:08-

CV-01028 GEB AC). (Doc. 22) Review of that docket reveals Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in 

that case which reflects the case number of the Tilton matter, on June 6, 2013. It does appear that this 

complaint may have been filed in the wrong case. However, because it was filed in the case that 

LUIS V. RODRIGUEZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CDCR DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW 

BOARD, et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00757 – JLT (PC)

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW 

CAUSE; ORDER GRANTING 21 DAYS TO FILE 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 1:12-cv-00757-DAD-JLT Document 23 Filed 07/05/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

corresponds to the case number Plaintiff placed in the caption, the Court will not now refile the 

complaint in this current action.

Instead, Plaintiff is granted 21 days to file his amended complaint in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 5, 2013 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00757-DAD-JLT Document 23 Filed 07/05/13 Page 2 of 2