Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02196/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02196-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OLEGS KOZACENKO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 

OFFICER ANDREW P. MURRILL, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:12-cv-2196 MCE DAD

ORDER

On October 18, 2013, this matter came before the court for hearing of plaintiff’s

motion to compel. Plaintiff’s motion was granted and defendants were ordered to produce 

documents subject to the parties entering into a stipulated protective order. Thereafter, the parties 

informed the court that they had reached an impasse as to a term of the stipulated protective 

order.

Accordingly, this matter again came before the court on November 22, 2013, for 

hearing of the parties’ disagreement with respect to the terms of the stipulated protective order. 

Attorney Stewart Katz appeared telephonically on behalf of the plaintiff. Deputy Attorney 

General Jill Scally appeared telephonically on behalf of the defendants. 

Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons 

set forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ request that 

Case 2:12-cv-02196-MCE-DAD Document 38 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

plaintiff be prohibited from having access to the discovery produced pursuant to the court’s 

previous order is denied and such a limitation shall not be included in the parties’ stipulated 

protective order. 

Dated: November 22, 2013

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.civil\kozacenko2196.oah.112213

Case 2:12-cv-02196-MCE-DAD Document 38 Filed 11/25/13 Page 2 of 2