Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02596/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02596-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KHALID N. KHAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 

et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-2596 KJM CKD PS

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

This matter has been referred to the undersigned for further proceedings in light of 

plaintiff’s third amended complaint. Upon review of the docket, THE COURT FINDS AS 

FOLLOWS:

The District Court adopted the recommendation that the action be dismissed for plaintiff’s 

lack of standing. The third amended complaint alleges no claims that are not barred by plaintiff’s 

lack of standing. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the prior findings and 

recommendations filed March 25, 2015 (ECF No. 31), the court will recommend that the third 

amended complaint be dismissed for plaintiff’s lack of standing.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action is stayed pending resolution 

by the District Judge of these findings and recommendations; and

/////

Case 2:13-cv-02596-KJM-CKD Document 37 Filed 08/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

1. The third amended complaint be dismissed; and

2. This action be closed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: August 18, 2015

4 khan2596.ubfr.bk

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:13-cv-02596-KJM-CKD Document 37 Filed 08/18/15 Page 2 of 2