Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00289/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00289-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY WIMBERLY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0289 DFL GGH P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On June 22, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed June 2, 2006, dismissing plaintiff’s claims against all defendants in the

original complaint with leave to amend but for defendants Sacramento County, Sacramento

Sheriff’s Department and Lou Blanas regarding a racially discriminatory housing policy.

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that

it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed June 2, 2006, is

affirmed;

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00289-JAM-GGH Document 14 Filed 01/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file an amended

complaint.

DATED: 1/15/2007

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00289-JAM-GGH Document 14 Filed 01/16/07 Page 2 of 2