Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00768/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00768-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DALE OWEN DUSTIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

G. GALAZA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00768-LJO-YNP PC

ORDER DENYING MOTION

(Doc. 42.)

and

ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 41.)

Plaintiff Dale Owen Dustin (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 8, 2009, Plaintiff

filed a pleading entitled “Memorandum of Understanding, Motion for Extension of Time Request

for Specific Yes or No Response in Re Return Copy.” Plaintiff’s motion requests an extension of

time to file his second amended complaint because he was unable to obtain copy service at his

prison. Plaintiff was granted an extension of time and filed his second amended complaint on

October 26, 2009. (Docs. #44, 45.) Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion will be denied as moot.

On September 9, 2009, the Court issued a findings and recommendations recommending that

this action be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to file his second amended complaint on time. 

(Doc. #41.) The findings and recommendations was issued before Plaintiff’s motion for an

extension of time appeared on the docket. Plaintiff has since filed his second amended complaint. 

As such, the findings and recommendations will be vacated.

1

Case 1:05-cv-00768-LJO-MJS Document 46 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time, filed on September 8, 2009, is DENIED as

moot; and

2. The Court’s September 9, 2009 findings and recommendations is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 13, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:05-cv-00768-LJO-MJS Document 46 Filed 04/13/10 Page 2 of 2