Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02687/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02687-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

B

E

E

S

O

N

T

E

R

H

O

R

S

T LLP

510 BERCUT DRIVE, SUITE V 

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95811-0111 

 (916) 444-3400 TELEPHONE 

(916) 444-3421 FACSIMILE

-1- 

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL DEADLINES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JEFFREY E. BEESON, SBN 200897 

MICHAEL A. TERHORST, SBN 164679 

BEESON TERHORST LLP 

510 Bercut Drive, Suite V 

Sacramento, California 95811-0111 

Telephone: (916) 444-3400 

Facsimile: (916) 444-3421 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MICHELLE JAUREGUITO 

ROBERT H. JOHNSON, SBN 48067 

JOHNSON, SCHACHTER & LEWIS 

2180 Harvard Street, Suite 560 

Sacramento, CA 95815 

Telephone: (916) 921-5800 

Facsimile: (916) 921-0247 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 

(sued herein as FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MICHELLE JAUREGUITO, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________ 

CASE NO.: 2:06-CV-02687-FCD-GGH 

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION OF PRE-TRIAL AND 

TRIAL DEADLINES 

“AS MODIFIED”

 

Plaintiff MICHELLE JAUREGUITO and Defendant FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY 

COLLEGE DISTRICT (hereinafter “FRC”) (sued herein as FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY 

COLLEGE) submit the following STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF PRE-TRIAL 

AND TRIAL DEADLINES (“Motion”): 

By this Motion, Plaintiff Michelle Jaureguito and Defendant Feather River Community 

College District (referred to collectively as the “Parties”) seek to modify the pre-trial scheduling 

Case 2:06-cv-02687-KJM-GGH Document 23 Filed 11/20/07 Page 1 of 3
B

E

E

S

O

N

T

E

R

H

O

R

S

T LLP

510 BERCUT DRIVE, SUITE V 

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95811-0111 

 (916) 444-3400 TELEPHONE 

(916) 444-3421 FACSIMILE

-2- 

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL DEADLINES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

order to extend the period for discovery, all other pre-trial deadlines and trial date in this matter, 

originally set per the Court’s March 12, 2007 Order. One modification of the original pre-trial 

scheduling order was ordered on September 20, 2007. 

The Parties have engaged in extensive discovery, participated in mediation, and completed a 

related administrative hearing before the California State Personnel Board. Issues have arisen in 

the mediation and administrative hearing that necessitate further discovery. The Parties therefore 

seek to extend the current pre-trial deadlines so that they may complete discovery. The Parties 

request that all dates be extended approximately ninety (90) days. 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) provides that a pretrial order may be modified, “upon 

a showing of good cause.” This Court may modify a pretrial scheduling order if “it cannot 

reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.” Johnson v. Mammoth 

Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d. 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, advisory 

committee’s notes (1983 amendment)). The “good cause” inquiry focuses primarily on the 

“diligence of the party seeking the amendment.” Id. 

Here, the Parties have diligently participated in discovery, but are unable to meet the 

scheduling deadlines due to the complex nature of this case. Therefore, good cause exists for an 

extension of the pre-trial deadlines in this matter. 

The Parties stipulate to the following proposed pre-trial dates and trial date: 

Discovery Closes: February 15, 2008 

Expert Disclosures Due: March 3, 2008 

Rebuttal Expert Disclosures Due: April 4, 2008 

Expert Discovery Cutoff: June 2, 2008 

Dispositive Motion Deadline: August 22, 2008 

Final Pre-Trial Conference: October 24, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. 

The Joint Pretrial statement shall be filed no later than October 17, 2008. 

Jury Trial: January 13, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. 

 The Parties further stipulate to consider this matter submitted on this Motion pursuant to 

Eastern District Court of California Local Rule No. 78-230(h). 

Case 2:06-cv-02687-KJM-GGH Document 23 Filed 11/20/07 Page 2 of 3
B

E

E

S

O

N

T

E

R

H

O

R

S

T LLP

510 BERCUT DRIVE, SUITE V 

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95811-0111 

 (916) 444-3400 TELEPHONE 

(916) 444-3421 FACSIMILE

-3- 

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL DEADLINES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The Parties stipulate only to continue the aforementioned deadlines, leaving the original 

March 12, 2007 Order otherwise in tact. The Parties further stipulate to consider this matter 

submitted on this Motion pursuant to Eastern District Court of California Local Rule No. 78-

230(h). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: November 19, 2007 BEESON TERHORST LLP 

 By: /s/ Michael A. Terhorst 

MICHAEL A. TERHORST 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PAUL THEIN 

Dated: November 19, 2007 JOHNSON SCHACHTER & LEWIS 

A Professional Law Corporation 

By: /s/ Robert H. Johnson 

ROBERT H. JOHNSON 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FEATHER RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 

DISTRICT 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November 20, 2007 

Case 2:06-cv-02687-KJM-GGH Document 23 Filed 11/20/07 Page 3 of 3