Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01383/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01383-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LINDA MOTLEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. FIGGENNETTIA,

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-1383-LJO DLB PC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO SUBMIT NEW EVIDENCE

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

RETURN PLAINTIFF’S EVIDENCE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 27, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion to submit new

evidence. Plaintiff is advised that the court cannot serve as a repository for the parties' evidence (i.e.,

prison or medical records, affidavits, etc.). The parties may not file evidence with the court until the

course of litigation brings the evidence into question (for example, on a motion for summary

judgment, at trial, or when requested by the court). There is nothing pending in this action that

requires plaintiff to submit evidence. The Court notes that proposed evidence plaintiff seeks to

submit is not related to her exhaustion of administrative remedies and therefore is not responsive to

the Court’s Findings and Recommendations issued February 29, 2008. Therefore, the documents

attached with plaintiff’s motion will be returned to plaintiff.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to submit new evidence is HEREBY DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 5, 2008 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0h UNI j8 TED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01383-LJO-DLB Document 37 Filed 03/06/08 Page 1 of 1