Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06580/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06580-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MORRIS LEE MESTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

DR. M. KIM, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:04-cv-06580-LJO-SMS PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 135)

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S FILINGS

FROM THE RECORD

(Docs. 132, 133, and 134)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

(Doc. 100)

Plaintiff Morris Lee Mester (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On July 13, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. On July 25, 2007, plaintiff filed

an Objection. 

///

///

Case 1:04-cv-06580-LJO -SMS Document 137 Filed 08/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings andRecommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 13, 2007, is adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s filings of June 15, 2007, June 25, 2007, and July 2, 2007, are STRICKEN

from the record; 

3. Defendants’ motion forsummary judgment, filed February 15, 2007, is GRANTED,

thus concluding this action in its entirety; and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for defendants and against plaintiff and

close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 14, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06580-LJO -SMS Document 137 Filed 08/14/07 Page 2 of 2