Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02201/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02201-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ICONIX, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

 LANCE TOKUDA, ET AL,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

Case No. 06-02201 SBA (JCS)

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

SCHEDULING

A discovery conference was held on May 16, 2006. Kenneth A. Kuwayti and Sue Vaughn,

counsel for Plaintiff, appeared. I. Neel Chatterjee and Michael A. Aparicio, counsel for Defendants,

appeared.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The parties shall enter into a stipulation to be presented to Judge Armstrong with a

proposed schedule for discovery, briefing and hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary

Injunction.

2. Discovery is open as of May 16, 2006.

3. The parties shall continue to meet-and-confer pursuant to Rule 26(f) and provide a report

to the Court at the conclusion of the conference in accordance with Rule 26(f).

4. Before filing any future discovery motions, lead trial counsel for Plaintiff and lead trial

counsel for Defendants shall meet and confer in person regarding the subject matter of the Motions

in an effort to resolve these matters. After attempting other means to confer on the issue (i.e. letter,

phone, e-mail) any party may demand such an in person meeting on ten (10) business days notice. 

The location of the meeting will alternate with the first location selected by counsel for Plaintiff, the

second by counsel for Defendant, etc. Within five (5) business days of the lead trial counsels’ 

Case 4:06-cv-02201-SBA Document 31 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

meet-and-confer session, the parties shall provide a detailed Joint Letter to the Court. This Joint

Letter shall include a description of every issue in dispute and, with respect to each such issue, a

detailed summary of each party’s final substantive position and their final proposed compromise on

each issue. Upon receipt of the Joint Letter, the Court will then determine what future proceedings

are necessary. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 19, 2006 _______________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:06-cv-02201-SBA Document 31 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 2