Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00431/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00431-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFERSON DEAN UNDERWOOD, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-00431-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 13)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On April 14, 2006, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254 in this Court.

On August 6, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending the motion to dismiss be granted and that the petition for writ

of habeas corpus be dismissed for Petitioner’s failure to follow the Court’s orders. (Doc. 13). 

This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. To date, the

parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed August 6, 2007 (Doc. 13), is

Case 1:06-cv-00431-LJO -TAG Document 15 Filed 08/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2 This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00431-LJO -TAG Document 15 Filed 08/28/07 Page 2 of 2