Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02335/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02335-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Defendants argue that plaintiff’s objections are not timely. Plaintiff’s objections are

timely. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (e).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HERBERT M. BELLINGER, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-2335 LKK GGH P

vs.

DEPUTY ALLBEE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action seeking relief under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 25, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

Case 2:02-cv-02335-LKK -GGH Document 69 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 25, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. Defendants’ December 17, 2004, summary judgment motion is granted as to

plaintiff’s claims against defendant Sacramento County and as to plaintiff’s claims for violation

of the Thirteenth Amendment as to all defendants; defendants’ summary judgment motion is

denied in all other respects. 

DATED: June 2, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/bell2335.805

Case 2:02-cv-02335-LKK -GGH Document 69 Filed 06/03/05 Page 2 of 2