Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02499/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02499-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Tort Claim

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

CASE NO. 3:18-CV-02499-WHO

GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP

Adam J. Gutride (State Bar No. 181446)

Seth A. Safier (State Bar No. 197427)

Todd Kennedy (State Bar No. 250267) 

Anthony Patek (State Bar No. 228964)

100 Pine Street, Suite 1250

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 639-9090

Facsimile: (415) 449-6469

adam@gutridesafier.com

seth@gutridesafier.com

todd@gutridesafier.com

anthony@gutridesafier.com

MIGLIACCIO & RATHOD LLP

Nicholas Migliaccio, admitted pro hac vice

Jason Rathod, admitted pro hac vice

Esfand Nafisi (State Bar No. 320119)

388 Market Street, Suite 1300

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (202) 470-3520

 Facsimile: (202) 800-2730

 nmigliaccio@classlawdc.com

 jrathod@classlawdc.com

 enafisi@classlawdc.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re: JUUL Labs, Inc. Products Litigation

CASE NO. 3:18-cv-02499-WHO

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE 

TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

Hon. William H. Orrick

Action Filed: April 26, 2018

Amended Complaint Filed: January 30, 2019

Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 107 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

CASE NO. 3:18-CV-02499-WHO

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs and Defendant JUUL Labs, Inc., by and through 

their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Amended Complaint on January 25, 2019 

(Dkt. 81);

WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on March 26, 2019;

WHEREAS, Defendant also filed a separate Motion to Compel Arbitration on March 26, 

2019; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is presently due on April 16, 

2019, and Defendant’s reply due on May 3, 2019, with a hearing set for May 22, 2019; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion to Compel Arbitration is presently due on 

April 9, 2019, and Defendant’s reply due on April 16, 2019, with a hearing set for May 22, 2019;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint asserts claims on behalf of 48 

named individuals, from 22 states and the District of Columbia, who seek to bring this action on a 

nationwide basis on behalf of all others similarly situated;

WHEREAS, the briefing and hearing schedule was set prior to Defendant’s filing of its 

Motion to Compel Arbitration;

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and have agreed it would be reasonable to extend the 

time within which Plaintiffs may respond to the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Compel 

Arbitration;

WHEREAS, the proposed stipulated extension would alter the hearing date set by the Court, 

and thus would require the Court’s approval pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following:

1. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Compel 

Arbitration on or before April 30, 2019;

2. Defendant shall file its reply papers on or before May 23, 2019;

3. The hearing on Defendant’s motions shall be set for June 12, 2019.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 107 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

CASE NO. 3:18-CV-02499-WHO

Dated: April 2, 2019 MIGLIACCIO & RATHOD LLP

By: /s/ Jason S. Rathod 

 Jason S. Rathod

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: April 2, 2019 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By: /s/ Austin V. Schwing 

 Austin V. Schwing

Attorneys for Defendant JUUL LABS, INC.

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION

I, Jason S. Rathod, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from the above signatories.

By: /s/ Jason S. Rathod 

 Jason S. Rathod

Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 107 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

CASE NO. 3:18-CV-02499-WHO

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 16, 2019 ____________________________________

THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:18-cv-02499-WHO Document 107 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 4