Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00113/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00113-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK ANTHONY BAILEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

OAKDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et )

al., )

)

Defendants. )

)

 )

1:05-cv-00113-REC-SMS

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON THE

MOTION OF STEPHEN SOLANO TO

WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD

(DOC. 37) AND DEEMING THE MATTER

SUBMITTED FOR DECISION

VACATED HEARING DATE: JANUARY 13,

2006

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO

SERVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER ON

PLAINTIFF AT THE ADDRESS STATED

IN THIS ORDER 

Plaintiff is proceeding with a civil action in this Court.

The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302(c) and 72-303.

On November 18, 2005, Stephen Solano, counsel for Plaintiff,

filed a motion to withdraw as attorney of record for Plaintiff,

and a proof of service of the motion by mail on Plaintiff. The

Court’s docket reveals that the motion has been electronically

served on counsel for Defendants. On November 29, 2005, the Court

directed that any opposition or input on the motion be filed no

later than December 22, 2005. On December 5, 2005, Defendant

Case 1:05-cv-00113-OWW -SMS Document 41 Filed 01/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

filed notice of non-opposition to the motion. No other input or

opposition has been received.

Pursuant to Rule 78-230(h) of the Local Rules of Practice

for the United States District Court, Eastern District of

California, the Court finds that the motion of Plaintiff’s

counsel to withdraw as counsel is a matter that may appropriately

be submitted upon the record and briefs, including the notice of

motion, memorandum of points and authorities, and declaration of

Stephen Solano filed in support thereof, and Defendants’ notice

of non-opposition to the motion.

Accordingly, the hearing on the motion, presently set for

January 13, 2005, IS VACATED, and the motion IS DEEMED SUBMITTED

to the Court for decision.

The Clerk of the Court IS DIRECTED to serve a copy of this

order on the Plaintiff Mark Anthony Bailey by mail at the

following address, which counsel has represented is Plaintiff’s

address:

Mr. Mark Anthony Bailey

1049 East A Street

Oakdale, California 95361.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00113-OWW -SMS Document 41 Filed 01/09/06 Page 2 of 2