Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06523/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06523-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE CNET NETWORKS, INC.

SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE

LITIGATION

______________________________________

This Document Relates To:

ALL ACTIONS

 /

No. C 06-03817 WHA

FURTHER ORDER FOR

INFORMATION

The Court presumed, based on Mr. Down’s earlier statements, that the Delaware

complaint and summons would be served by June 8, 2007, or close thereto. Now, it is June 19

and the complaint still has not been served. Mr. Downs is requested to explain why he did not

obtain a summons when he flew back to Delaware to file the complaint (as per his May

representation) so that the complaint could be served forthwith. The Court has said that this

ancillary effort must move with alacrity or else we will dispense with it. Mr. Downs must reply

by declaration by FRIDAY, JUNE 22, 2007, AT NOON. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 19, 2007. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-06523-WHA Document 47 Filed 06/19/07 Page 1 of 1