Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00723/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00723-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

17-CV-723-CAB-WVG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v.

ATT, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 17-CV-723-CAB-WVG

ORDER EXTENDING 

DEFENDANT’S TIME FOR A 

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL

On June 4, 2018, Plaintiff Andre Smith moved the Court for an order compelling

Defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company to produce documentsresponsive to Plaintiff’s

document requests. (ECF No. 46.) Prior to filing his motion, on May 25, 2018, the Court

convened a telephonic discovery conference where Plaintiff sought leave to file the motion.

The Court granted Plaintiff’s request and ordered Plaintiff to file his motion on or before

June 1, 2018. (See ECF No. 45.) Plaintiff filed and served his motion three days past the

date by which he was to do so. Accordingly, the Court sua sponte continues the date by

which Defendant must respond to June 13, 2018.

Plaintiff is hereby advised that any future tardy filings will be disregarded, result in

sanctions, or both.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 8, 2018

Case 3:17-cv-00723-CAB-WVG Document 47 Filed 06/08/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 1