Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-03031/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-03031-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

David Lake, 

Plaintiff,

v.

City of Phoenix, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV06-3031-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to

Disclose Expert Witness and Defendants to File Rebuttal (Second Request) (Doc. # 32). The

deadline of September 28, 2007 was set by the Court’s Rule 16 Scheduling Order of August

28, 2007 (Doc. #27), and was proposed in their Proposed Case Management Plan (Doc. #23).

The Court granted the parties’ first request for an extension, providing the parties an

additional ten (10) days. Nonetheless, the Court is willing to grant the parties’ second

request with the explicit notation that no other dates are to be affected by this extension.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff shall have until November 15, 2007 to

disclose Plaintiff’s expert witness and Defendants shall have until December 15, 2007 to

disclose their rebuttal to Plaintiff’s expert witness.

DATED this 16th day of October, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-03031-SMM Document 33 Filed 10/17/07 Page 1 of 1