Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06388/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06388-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOUIS FRESQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. ZIMMERMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:03-cv-6388 OWW WMW P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND

DISMISSING ACTION

Before the Court are objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations filed July 17, 2006, recommending

dismissal of this case for the failure and refusal of Plaintiff

to follow the prior order of the Court requiring a complaint that

complied specifically with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

§ 8(a)(2), requiring a clear and plain statement of Plaintiff’s

claims and the factual allegations in support of those claims. 

The Plaintiff was advised that he could not attach documents and

incorporate allegations in addition to the documents. 

On August 22, 2006, Plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations. The objections

contain extended legal argument that has nothing to do with the

pleading deficiencies that the Court had ordered be corrected. 

Case 1:03-cv-06388-OWW -WMW Document 33 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff has been given two prior opportunities to file an

amended complaint that complies with the requirements of Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and Federal law. He refuses to do so. 

IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations of the

Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED without

prejudice by reason of Plaintiff’s failure and refusal to file an

amended complaint as required by prior order of the Court and the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 5, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06388-OWW -WMW Document 33 Filed 10/05/06 Page 2 of 2