Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00557/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00557-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

Bates et al v. County of Santa Cruz, Case No. CV 080557 SC Stipulation and Proposed Order 

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANA McRAE, State Bar No. 142231 

County Counsel, County of Santa Cruz 

JASON M. HEATH, State Bar No. 180501 

Assistant County Counsel 

BETSY L. ALLEN, State Bar No. 146386 

Assistant County Counsel 

701 Ocean Street, Room 505 

Santa Cruz, California 95060 

Telephone: (831) 454-2040 

Fax: (831) 454-2115 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JAMES BATES et all acting for themselves and 

others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. CV 08 0557 SC 

STIPULATION TO TRANSFER CIVIL 

ACTION TO SAN JOSE DIVISION; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

STIPULATION

 This civil action was originally filed in the San Francisco Division of the United States 

District Court, Northern District of California. 

 The parties agree that the San Francisco Division is not the proper division for this 

assignment. Northern District Court Local Civil Rule (“Rule”) No. 3-2(e) provides that all civil 

actions that arise in the County of Santa Cruz shall be assigned to the San Jose Division. Rule No. 

3-2(c) states that a civil action arises in the county in which a substantial part of the events or 

omissions which give rise to the claim occurred. All of the events and omissions alleged in this 

Case 5:08-cv-00557-JW Document 9 Filed 03/04/08 Page 1 of 2
Bates et al v. County of Santa Cruz, Case No. CV 080557 SC Stipulation and Proposed Order 

-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

action occurred in the County of Santa Cruz. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that this action has 

not been assigned to the proper division and should be transferred to the San Jose Division 

 

Dated: February 25, 2008 DANA McRAE, COUNTY COUNSEL 

 By: ________/S/_______________________

 BETSY L. ALLEN 

 Assistant County Counsel 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: February 20, 2008 MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT AMICK MILLER 

JOHNSEN & UHRHAMMER 

 By: _______/S/_________________________ 

 JAMES R. TRABER 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ORDER

 For good cause shown as set forth above, the Court hereby orders that this action be 

transferred to the San Jose Division of the Northern District of California. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________ _______________________________ 

 HON. SAMUEL CONTI 

 United States District Court Judge 

 

 

3/4/08

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 5:08-cv-00557-JW Document 9 Filed 03/04/08 Page 2 of 2