Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06222/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06222-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. TO RESPOND TO ELEC & ELTEK (USA) 

CORPORATION AND WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC.’S 

ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO HALO’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT (DOC. NOS. 168, 170)

Case No. 07-6222 RMW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Juanita Brooks (CA#75934 / brooks@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

12390 El Camino Real

San Diego, CA 92130

Telephone: (858) 678-5070

Facsimile: (858) 678-5099

Limin Zheng (CA #226875 / zheng@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

Redwood City, CA 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Michael J. Kane (Admitted pro hac vice / kane@fr.com)

William R. Woodford (Admitted pro hac vice / woodford@fr.com)

Michael J. Pape (Admitted pro hac vice / pape@fr.com)

John C. Adkisson (Admitted pro hac vice / adkisson@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

3200 RBC Plaza

60 South Sixth Street

Minneapolis, MN 55402

Telephone: (612) 335-5070

Facsimile: (612) 288-9696

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN JOSE DIVISION)

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

BEL FUSE INC., E & E MAGNETIC 

PRODUCTS LIMITED, ELEC & ELTEK (USA) 

CORPORATION, WURTH ELECTRONICS 

MIDCOM, INC., WURTH ELEKTRONIK 

GMBH & CO. KG, and XFMRS, INC.,

 Defendants

Civil Case No. 07-6222 RMW

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR HALO 

ELECTRONICS, INC. TO RESPOND TO 

ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION 

AND WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, 

INC.’S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM

TO HALO’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT (DOC. NOS. 168, 170)

*E-FILED - 4/21/10*

Case 5:07-cv-06222-RMW Document 179 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 4
1 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. 

TO RESPOND TO ELEC & ELTEK (USA) 

CORPORATION AND WURTH ELECTRONICS 

MIDCOM, INC.’S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM 

TO HALO’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 

NOS. 168, 170)

Case No. 07-6222 RMW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6.1(a), Plaintiff Halo Electronics, Inc. (“Halo”) and 

Defendants Elec & Eltek (USA) Corporation (“E&E (USA)”) and Wurth Electronics Midcom, Inc. 

(“Wurth”), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time for Halo to respond to 

E&E (USA) and Wurth’s respective Answers and Counterclaims to Halo’s First Amended 

Complaint (Doc Nos. 168 and 170, respectively) from April 19, 2010 until, and including May 3, 

2010. Such extension will provide the parties an opportunity to meet and confer on Halo’s motion 

to strike the inequitable conduct allegations in E&E (USA) and Wurth’s Answers, which Halo 

currently intends to file with its Answers to E&E (USA) and Wurth’s Counterclaims.

Halo and Defendant E&E Magnetic Products Limited (“EEMPL”), by and through their 

counsel, further stipulate that EEMPL will have until and including May 7, 2010 to file answer or 

otherwise respond to Halo’s First Amended Complaint.

The parties do not believe that the proposed extension of time will alter the date of any 

event or deadline already fixed by Court Order.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 19, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Michael J. Kane

Michael J. Kane

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC.

Case 5:07-cv-06222-RMW Document 179 Filed 04/21/10 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME 

FOR HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. TO RESPOND TO ELEC & 

ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION AND WURTH ELECTRONICS 

MIDCOM, INC.’S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO HALO’S 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NOS. 168, 170)

Case No. 07-6222 RMW

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: April 19, 2010 BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL 

& BERKOWITZ, P.C.

By: /s/ Michael J. Powell

Michael J. Powell

Attorneys for Defendant

ELEC & ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION

Dated: April 19, 2010 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

By: /s/ Emily R. Frank

Emily R. Frank 

Attorneys for Defendant

WURTH ELECTRONICS MIDCOM, INC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________________ __________________________________

HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

4/21/10

Case 5:07-cv-06222-RMW Document 179 Filed 04/21/10 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING TIME 

FOR HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. TO RESPOND TO ELEC & 

ELTEK (USA) CORPORATION AND WURTH ELECTRONICS 

MIDCOM, INC.’S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO HALO’S 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NOS. 168, 170)

Case No. 07-6222 RMW

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to the Northern District of California Electronic Filing Procedures and General 

Order No. 45, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the 

signatories listed above. 

Dated: April 19, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Limin Zheng__________________

 Limin Zheng

 Attorney for Plaintiff

 HALO, INC.

Case 5:07-cv-06222-RMW Document 179 Filed 04/21/10 Page 4 of 4