Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-05937/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-05937-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., 

PLAINTIFF, 

V. 

FITBIT, INC., 

DEFENDANT.

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., 

PLAINTIFF, 

V. 

MOOV, INC., 

DEFENDANT. 

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., 

PLAINTIFF, 

V. 

NIKE, INC., 

DEFENDANT. 

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., 

PLAINTIFF, 

V. 

FOSSIL GROUP, INC., 

DEFENDANT. 

 

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES 

TO FILE OMNIBUS BRIEFS 

CASE NO. 17-cv-05928-YGR 

CASE NO. 17-cv-05929-YGR 

CASE NO. 17-cv-05931-YGR 

CASE NO. 17-cv-05933-YGR 

Case 4:17-cv-05937-YGR Document 29 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 3
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., 

PLAINTIFF, 

V. 

TOMTOM, INC. ET AL., 

DEFENDANT. 

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., 

PLAINTIFF, 

V. 

GOPRO, INC., 

DEFENDANT. 

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., 

PLAINTIFF, 

V. 

PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH 

AMERICA, 

DEFENDANT. 

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., 

PLAINTIFF, 

V. 

ADIDAS AMERICA, INC. 

DEFENDANT. 

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., 

PLAINTIFF, 

V. 

JK IMAGINING LTD. 

DEFENDANT. 

CASE NO. 17-cv-05937-YGR 

CASE NO. 17-cv-05939-YGR 

CASE NO. 17-cv-5941-YGR 

CASE NO. 17-cv-5930-YGR 

CASE NO. 17-cv-06881-YGR 

Case 4:17-cv-05937-YGR Document 29 Filed 12/22/17 Page 2 of 3
3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

The above-captioned matters are related cases in which defendant has filed, or may file, a 

motion to dismiss based on the Supreme Court’s holding in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank 

Int’l, 213 S.Ct. 2348 (2014). Accordingly, all pending motions to dismiss are DENIED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE to refile in compliance with this order. 

Defendants shall file one omnibus motion to dismiss not to exceed twenty five pages by 

January 16, 2018. Each defendant shall be permitted to supplement the motion with five 

additional pages if issues exist which are specific to that defendant’s individual case. 

Plaintiff shall file one consolidated opposition by January 30, 2018. 

Defendants shall file one omnibus reply not to exceed fifteen pages by February 13, 

2018. Each defendant shall be permitted to supplement the reply with two additional pages if 

issues exist which are specific to that defendant’s individual case. 

With regard to those cases for which defendant’s reply is not yet due, namely Cellspin 

Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Adidas America, Inc., 17-cv-5930-YGR and Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. JK 

Imagining Ltd, 17-cv-06881-YGR, defendant shall file notice with the Court indicating whether 

defendant intends to join the consolidated motion to dismiss based on the Supreme Court’s 

holding in Alice Corp. 

A hearing on defendants’ omnibus motion to dismiss shall be held on Tuesday, March 6, 

2018, at 2:00 p.m., at the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 

Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building, Oakland, in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

December 22, 2017

Case 4:17-cv-05937-YGR Document 29 Filed 12/22/17 Page 3 of 3