Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03711/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03711-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL PADILLA, on behalf of himself

and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY OF

CALIFORNIA, A MEDICAL

CORPORATION; 21ST CENTURY

ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.; and

DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendant. /

No. C 16-03711 WHA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART

MOTION FOR EXTENSION

The Court is in receipt of defendants’ motion for an extension to respond to plaintiff’s

complaint until thirty days after a ruling on the motion to transfer. Defendants’ deadline for

responding to plaintiff’s complaint is on July 29, 2016. This motion should have been made

sooner. Regardless of whether the case is transferred, defendants will eventually need to

respond to plaintiff’s complaint. There will be no waste in beginning that work. Given that the

deadline is in less than a week, however, this order grants an additional two weeks for

defendants to respond to plaintiff’s complaint. It is unwarranted to postpone work that will

Case 3:16-cv-03711-WHA Document 17 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

eventually need to be done. Defendants shall therefore respond to plaintiff’s complaint by

August 12, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-03711-WHA Document 17 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 2