Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00600/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00600-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY W. BURY,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMY BRADISH, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-00600-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER STRIKING DUPLICATIVE

REQUESTS FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND

FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT

AGAINST DEFENDANT BRADISH

(Docs. 32 and 33)

On October 10, 2006, plaintiff filed requests seeking the entry of default and the entry of

default judgment against defendant Bradish. Both requests have alreadybeen made by plaintiff. The

Clerk of the Court entered default against defendant Bradish on June 9, 2006, and on September 28,

2006, plaintiff’s motion for default judgment was served on defendant Bradish bythe Clerk’s Office.

Defendant Bradish has twenty-one days within which to respond. Local Rule 78-230(m). Plaintiff

did not seek leave of court to amend orsupplement his pendingmotion for entry of default judgment.

For these reasons, both requests shall be stricken from the record as duplicative of previously filed

motions. 

To the extent plaintiff filed a second motion for entry of default judgment to set forth a future

calendar date, plaintiff’s motion is unnecessary. The motion shall be resolved on the papers and

shall not be set for hearing, unless the court deems it necessary upon review of the moving and

responsive papers. Local Rule 78-230(m).

///

///

Case 1:05-cv-00600-LJO -GSA Document 34 Filed 10/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, plaintiff’s requests seeking the entry of default and the entry of default

judgment against defendant Bradish, filed October 10, 2006, are HEREBY STRICKEN as

duplicative of previously filed motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 13, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00600-LJO -GSA Document 34 Filed 10/16/06 Page 2 of 2