Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01974/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01974-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 385
Nature of Suit: Property Damage - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

F:\docs\spc\spc.015\Plead\[proposed]order for ex parte to shorten time-2.wpd [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

Brian S. Letofsky - Bar No. 159232

Richard J. Stinstrom - Bar No. 140675

PIERCE & WEISS, LLP

451 W. Lincoln Avenue

Anaheim, California 92805

Tel: (714) 778-5038

Fax: (714) 778-1467

Email: bletofsky@pierceweiss.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SUNBEAM CORPORATION; BIDDEFORD

TEXTILE CORPORATION (DOE 1);

BIDDEFORD BLANKETS, LLC (DOE 2), and

DOES 3-25,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C05-01974 BZ

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION TO

SHORTEN TIME

This matter came on for hearing on _________/______/2006, on Plaintiff's duly noticed Ex Parte

Motion to Shorten Time for Plaintiff to Bring Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve Second Amended

Complaint. Having read the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion and

having considered the arguments of counsel, the Court finds that justice requires that plaintiff’s Ex

Parte Motion be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Ex Parte Motion to shorten time is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff’s Proposed Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve Second Amended Complaint is now

set for hearing on _____/____/2006 at ________, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard,

in Room G, Fifteenth Floor of this Court.

Case 3:05-cv-01974-BZ. Document 48 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 1 of 3

- No opposition.

Case 4:05-cv-01974-PJH Document 50 Filed 04/27/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

F:\docs\spc\spc.015\Plead\[proposed]order for ex parte to shorten time-2.wpd [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

3. Any Opposition papers are to be filed by Defendants by _____/_____/2006.

4. Any Reply papers are to be filed by Plaintiff by _____/_______/2006.

Dated: _________________. 

_________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-01974-BZ. Document 48 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 2 of 3

April 27, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 4:05-cv-01974-PJH Document 50 Filed 04/27/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

F:\docs\spc\spc.015\Plead\[proposed]order for ex parte to shorten time-2.wpd [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

Case 3:05-cv-01974-BZ. Document 48 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 3 of 3 Case 4:05-cv-01974-PJH Document 50 Filed 04/27/06 Page 3 of 3