Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07067/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07067-85/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A/73185808.1/2007550-0000323151 No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT/JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP 

William F. Abrams (SBN 88805) 

william.abrams@bingham.com 

David S. Cannon (SBN 209501) 

david.cannon@bingham.com 

Erin A. Smart (SBN 246288) 

erin.smart@bingham.com 

Sandra C. Zuniga (SBN 250881) 

sandra.zuniga@bingham.com 

1900 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2223 

Telephone: 650.849.4400 

Facsimile: 650.849.4800 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Hewlett-Packard Company 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MMCA Group Ltd., 

Plaintiff,

v.

Hewlett-Packard Company, et al, 

Defendant.

No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING 

MATERIAL IN HP’S 

SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT/JUDGMENT 

ON THE PLEADINGS

[L. R. Civ. P. 79-5] 

[No Hearing Required] 

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

On October 30, 2009, Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) filed an Administrative 

Motion to Seal Material in HP’s Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment/Judgment on 

the Pleadings (“Administrative Motion”) and a supporting declaration (“Declaration”) 

establishing that the designated material is subject to being sealed. 

The Court, having considered the Administrative Motion and Declaration, finds 

the requested material, listed below subject to being sealed: 

1. Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment/Judgment on the Pleadings Briefing on Defendant Hewlett-Packard's

^

7067

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 702 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A/73185808.1/2007550-0000323151 2 No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT/JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 

2. Declaration of Sandra Zuniga in Support of HP’s Supplemental Motion for 

Summary Judgment/Judgment on the Pleadings (“Zuniga Decl.”) 

3. The following Exhibits to the Zuniga Decl. 

a. Exhibit A

b. Exhibit B 

c. Exhibit C

d. Exhibit D

e. Exhibit E

f. Exhibit F

g. Exhibit G

h. Exhibit H

i. Exhibit I 

j. Exhibit J 

k. Exhibit K 

l. Exhibit L 

m. Exhibit M 

n. Exhibit N 

o. Exhibit O 

p. Exhibit P 

q. Exhibit Q 

r. Exhibit R 

s. Exhibit S 

t. Exhibit T 

u. Exhibit U 

v. Exhibit V 

w. Exhibit W 

x. Exhibit X 

y. Exhibit Y 

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 702 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A/73185808.1/2007550-0000323151 3 No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT/JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 

z. Exhibit Z 

aa. Exhibit AA

bb. Exhibit BB 

4. Declaration of Warren Rother in Support of HP’s Supplemental Motion for 

Summary Judgment (“Rother Decl.”) 

5. The following Exhibits to the Rother Decl. 

a. Exhibit A

b. Exhibit B 

c. Exhibit C

d. Exhibit D

e. Exhibit E

f. Exhibit F

g. Exhibit G

6. Declaration of Mikhail Reider-Gordon in Support of HP’s Supplemental 

Motion for Summary Judgment (“Reider-Gordon Decl.”) 

7. The following Exhibits to the Reider-Gordon Decl. 

a. Exhibit A

8. Hewlett-Packard Company’s Supplemental Evidentiary Objections to the 

Declaration of Morgan Cherry in Opposition to Defendant Hewlett-Packard 

Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Alternatively Motion for 

Judgment on the Pleadings 

9. Hewlett-Packard Company’s Supplemental Evidentiary Objections to the 

Declaration of Thomas Byrne in Opposition to Defendant Hewlett-Packard 

Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Alternatively Motion for 

Judgment on the Pleadings 

10. Hewlett-Packard Company’s Supplemental Evidentiary Objections to the 

Declaration of Lau Geckler in Opposition to Defendant Hewlett-Packard 

Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Alternatively Motion for 

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 702 Filed 01/05/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A/73185808.1/2007550-0000323151 4 No. 07-6076 MMC (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING MATERIAL IN HP’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT/JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 

Judgment on the Pleadings 

Therefore, pursuant to Rule 79 of the Local Civil Rules of the Northern District of 

California, the Administrative Motion is GRANTED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

Whenever filed, in whole or in part, with the Court in this case, the following 

material shall referenced above shall be filed under seal: 

DATED: _____________, 2009 By:

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Judge 

January 5, 2010

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 702 Filed 01/05/10 Page 4 of 4