Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00948/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00948-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIRECTV INC.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-03-0948 GEB GGH PS

vs.

JESSE ABUNDEZ, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed August 18, 2005, defendant, Peter Cao, was ordered to show cause,

within ten days, why his answer should not be stricken and judgment entered for plaintiff. The

ten day period has now expired, and defendant has not shown cause or otherwise responded to

the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the defendant Cao’s answer be stricken,

and judgment be entered for plaintiff.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:03-cv-00948-GEB-GGH Document 49 Filed 10/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 10/19/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:mb

DirectTV948.fsc

Case 2:03-cv-00948-GEB-GGH Document 49 Filed 10/20/05 Page 2 of 2