Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02380/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02380-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JARRITOS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LOS JARRITOS, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-05-2380 JSW (EMC)

ORDER FINDING MOOT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL

DEPOSITIONS

(Docket No. 100)

On December 5, 2006, the Court held a conference call on Plaintiff’s motion for additional

depositions. The Court concluded that five depositions had been taken by Plaintiff so that it is

entitled to take five more depositions under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 30(a)(2) (providing for ten depositions). Two of the remaining five depositions have already been

noticed (i.e., Dipietro & Shea and Mission Economic). Therefore, Plaintiff may notice an additional

three depositions. Plaintiff represented that, given the Court’s method of counting depositions, it

would not need additional depositions beyond the ten permitted under the Federal Rules. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for additional depositions is moot.

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:05-cv-02380-JSW Document 106 Filed 12/05/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Although not raised by Plaintiff in its motion, the Court takes note that it shall not bar

Defendants from taking one additional deposition given that it gave the benefit of the doubt to

Plaintiff in counting the number of depositions that had been taken by Plaintiff.

This order disposes of Docket No. 100.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 5, 2006 EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-02380-JSW Document 106 Filed 12/05/06 Page 2 of 2