Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00008/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00008-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JONATHAN O. PENA, ESQ. 

CA Bar ID No. 278044

Peña & Bromberg, PLC

2440 Tulare St., Suite 320

Fresno, CA 93721

Telephone: 559-412-5390

Fax: 866-282-6709

info@jonathanpena.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BORYSATH SAYSANASY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ANDREW SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:19-cv-00008-EPG

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME

(ECF No. 28)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective 

counsel of record, with the Court’s approval, that Plaintiff shall have a 30-day extension of time, 

from 01/28/2020 to 02/27/2020, for Plaintiff to serve on defendant with PLAINTIFF’S REPLY 

BRIEF. All other dates in the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.

This is Plaintiff’s third request for an extension of time in the life of the case, but first for 

the reply brief. Plaintiff respectfully states that the requested extension is necessary due to good 

cause. 

During the preceding days leading to the 1/28/2020 deadline, Plaintiff’s Counsel has had 

to provide over 60 hours of training, along with a heavy administrative workload. During the 

week of 1/27/2020, Plaintiff’s Counsel has 11 administrative hearings, in Fresno, Stockton, and 

San Jose, California, 24 pre-hearing meetings with claimants who have hearings 30 days out, and 

the administrative hearing briefs for administrative cases to be heard following week. 

Case 1:19-cv-00008-EPG Document 29 Filed 01/28/20 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Counsel requires additional time to reply to the defendant’s opening brief for the Court’s 

consideration. Defendant does not oppose the requested extension. Counsel apologizes to the 

Defendant and Court for any inconvenience this may cause. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: January 27, 2020 PENA & BROMBERG, ATTORNEYS AT LAW

By: /s/ Jonathan Omar Pena

JONATHAN OMAR PENA

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: January 27, 2020 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

By: */s/ Allison J. Cheung

Allison J. Cheung

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

(*As authorized by email on 01/27/2020)

Case 1:19-cv-00008-EPG Document 29 Filed 01/28/20 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 28), IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff 

shall have an extension of time to February 27, 2020, to file Plaintiff’s reply brief. All other dates 

in the Court’s Scheduling Order are extended accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2020 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-00008-EPG Document 29 Filed 01/28/20 Page 3 of 3