Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00157/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00157-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN, No. 2:07-cv-00157-MCE-EFB P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 10, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the date the findings

and recommendations were served. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

///

///

Case 2:07-cv-00157-MCE-EFB Document 137 Filed 08/19/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304,

this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 10, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s September 22, 2008 motion (docket no. 44), construed as a request for

injunctive relief, is DENIED;

3. Plaintiff’s November 10, 2008 motions for temporary restraining orders (docket nos.

51 and 52), are DENIED;

4. Plaintiff’s November 24, 2008 motion for federal placement (docket no. 55) is

DENIED; and

5. Plaintiff’s March 9, 2009 motion (docket no. 113) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 19, 2009

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00157-MCE-EFB Document 137 Filed 08/19/09 Page 2 of 2