Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00644/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00644-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

KEITH M. WHITE #188536 

COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

499 West Shaw, Suite 116 

Fresno, California 93704 

Telephone: (559) 248-4820 

Facsimile: (559) 248-4830 

Attorneys for Defendant, ARMEN POGHOSYAN dba 

MANCHESTER STEAKHOUSE 

TANYA E. MOORE #206683 

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 

332 North Second Street 

San Jose, CA 95112 

Telephone: (408) 298-2000 

Facsimile: (408) 298-6046 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, RONALD MOORE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RONALD MOORE, 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 v. 

OMNINET PROPERTIES 

MANCHESTER CENTER, LLC, a 

Delaware limited liability company; et al., 

 Defendant(s). 

NO. 1:15-cv-00644---BAM 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

DEFENDANT ARMEN POGHOSYAN 

DBA MANCHESTER STEAKHOUSE’S

DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; ORDER 

Complaint Served: April 29, 2015 

Response Date: June 17, 2015 

New Response Date: July 15, 2015 

WHEREAS, the responsive pleading of Defendant, Armen Poghosyan dba Manchester 

Steakhouse (hereinafter “Defendant”), was due on June 17, 2015, as the result of being served on 

April 29, 2015; 

/// 

WHEREAS, the scheduling conference in this matter is currently set for August 4, 2015; 

Case 1:15-cv-00644-BAM Document 41 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant wish additional time to attempt resolution of the 

matter without incurring fees and costs associated with filing responsive pleadings; 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to conserve the Court’s resources and time and not 

unnecessarily burden the Court with a matter that will likely be informally resolved; 

WHEREAS, a brief extension of time is necessary in order to complete the terms of the 

settlement between the parties and it is likely that the case will settle without further use of the 

Court’s resources and time; 

WHEREAS, the extension granted in this Stipulation will not affect or change any of the 

currently scheduled Court dates in this case. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff, through his attorney of record, and Defendant, through 

their attorney of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. That Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint be extended to July 15, 2015. 

Dated: June 16, 2015 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

By:____/s/ Keith M. White______________ 

 KEITH M. WHITE 

 Attorneys for Defendant, 

 ARMEN POGHOSYAN dba MANCHESTER 

 STEAKHOUSE 

Dated: June 16, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 

By:___/s/ Tanya E. Moore_____________ 

 TANYA E. MOORE 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 RONALD MOORE 

Case 1:15-cv-00644-BAM Document 41 Filed 06/23/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER 

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Armen Poghosyan dba Manchester 

Steakhouse’s response to the Complaint be filed no later than July 15, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 23, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00644-BAM Document 41 Filed 06/23/15 Page 3 of 3