Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04144/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04144-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stewart v. Woodford, No. CV04144 WHA

Stipulation & Order For Enlargement of Time 1

LAWRENCE GIBBS

SBN 98866

P.O. Box 7639

Berkeley, California 94707

Tel: (510) 525-6847

CLIFF GARDNER

SBN 93782

19 Embarcadero Cove 

Oakland, CA 94606

(510) 534-9404

Attorneys for Petitioner

Richard Stewart

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD STEWART, ) 

 ) No. C05-04144 WHA

Petitioner, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Stipulation & Order for 

) Enlargement of Time 

RODERICK Q. HICKMAN, in his capacity as ) to File Traverse

Secretary of the California Department of Corrections, )

)

 Respondent. )

___________________________________________ )

Pursuant to Habeas Local Rule 2254-6, and Civil Local Rule 6-3, petitioner and

respondent, by and through their counsel of record, hereby submit, for the Court’s

approval, this stipulation for a 30-day enlargement of time for petitioner to file his

Traverse to the Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. 

Recitals

1. The First Amended Petition was filed on January 20, 2006.

2. The Court issued an Order to Show Cause on January 31, 2006, and a

Revised Order to Show Cause on March 27, 2006.

3. Respondent sought, and received, four enlargements to time to file his

Answer.

Case 3:05-cv-04144-WHA Document 29 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cv-04144-WHA Document 30 Filed 11/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. Respondent filed his Answer to the Petition on September 26, 2006. 

Respondent’s memorandum in support of his answer was filed October 20, 2006.

5. Petitioner’s traverse to the answer is due November 20, 2006.

6. Petitioner requires an additional 30 days to prepare and file his traverse.

WHEREFORE, the parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby

stipulate to an enlargement of time of 30 days, to and including December 20, 2006, in

which petitioner may file his traverse to the answer to the petition.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: November 17, 2006 /s/ 

Lawrence A. Gibbs

Attorney for Petitioner

Dated: November 17, 2006 /s/ 

Mark S. Howell

Attorney for Respondent

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-04144-WHA Document 29 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 2 of 2

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

November 17, 2006

Case 3:05-cv-04144-WHA Document 30 Filed 11/17/06 Page 2 of 2