Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03030/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03030-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-02717-YGR (JSC)

 14-cv-03030-YGR (JSC) 

 14-cv-03031-YGR (JSC)

UNSEALING ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 101

On April 20, 2015, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for leave to reopen discovery for 

the limited purpose of modifying the prosecution bar. (Dkt. No. 100.) The Court filed the April 

20 Order under seal because various matters referenced therein were filed under seal in this matter. 

(Id. at 9.) However, the Court noted that it was “not persuaded that anything discussed in th[e] 

Order is in fact confidential and properly sealable” and required Defendants to inform the Court 

by no later than April 10 what information, if any, within the Order must remain sealed. (Id.) 

Defendants have since filed a notice indicating that they do not intend to request that any portion 

of the Order be maintained under seal. The Court notes that its Order contains no details of or 

references to the content of documents filed under seal. Accordingly, the Court orders that its 

April 20 Order be UNSEALED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2015

________________________

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:14-cv-03030-YGR Document 102 Filed 04/29/15 Page 1 of 1