Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06794/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06794-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

P:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.06\Sandeford6794.grant2ndEOToppn.frm

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NAPOLEON SANDEFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHARLES PLUMMER, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

No. 06-6794 SBA (PR)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF A

SECOND BRIEF EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

Plaintiff has filed a request for an extension of time in which to file his opposition to

Defendants' dispositive motion. Plaintiff has previously been granted an extension of time to file

his opposition. In an Order dated January 13, 2010, the time for Plaintiff to file an opposition

was extended up to and including February 15, 2010. Having read and considered Plaintiff's

request and the accompanying declaration filed by Plaintiff, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's second request for an extension of time is

GRANTED. Plaintiff claims that he needs an extension because he was "moved from Glen Dyer

to Dublin Federal Detention Center on 2-3-10 [and] all [his] legal work was taken from

[him] . . . ." (Mot. for EOT at 1.) He alleges that as of February 9, 2010, he had not yet received

his "legal work"; however, he was told that he would receive his "legal work by the end of the

week." (Id.) Thus, Plaintiff should have received his "legal work" on or around February 12,

2010. Accordingly, the Court finds a brief extension of time for Plaintiff to file his opposition is

warranted. Plaintiff must file his opposition to Defendants' dispositive motion no later than

March 1, 2010. Defendants may file their reply to the opposition no later than March 15, 2010. 

No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

This Order terminates Docket no. 68.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 2/16/10 

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-06794-SBA Document 69 Filed 02/17/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

P:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.06\Sandeford6794.grant2ndEOToppn.frm 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NAPOLEON SANDEFORD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHARLES PLUMMER et al,

Defendant. /

Case Number: CV06-06794 SBA 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District

Court, Northern District of California.

That on February 17, 2010, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing

said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office

delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Napoleon Sandeford UJH289

Federal Detention Center

5675 8th Street

Camp Parks

Dublin, CA 94568

Dated: February 17, 2010

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk

Case 4:06-cv-06794-SBA Document 69 Filed 02/17/10 Page 2 of 2