Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00322/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00322-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KELLY ALICE KESSLER, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

TINA HORNBEAK, Warden, et al.,) 

 )

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:10-cv—0322-LJO-BAM-HC

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO

FILE NO LATER THAN THIRTY (30)

DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SERVICE OF

THIS ORDER A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

ADDRESSING LEGAL ISSUES OMITTED

FROM THE ANSWER

ORDER PERMITTING PETITIONER TO

FILE A REPLY TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEF OF RESPONDENT NO LATER THAN

TWENTY (20) DAYS AFTER THE DATE

OF SERVICE OF RESPONDENT’S

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel with

a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 through

304. Pending before the Court is the first amended petition

(FAP) and related motion proceedings. 

The FAP was filed on January 18, 2011. Respondent filed an

answer on February 9, 2011. Petitioner filed a traverse on March

31, 2011. A review of these documents reveals that in the

answer, Respondent failed to respond to numerous legal arguments

of the Petitioner that were affirmatively set forth in the FAP

concerning the validity of the AEDPA and the applicability of the

1

Case 1:10-cv-00322-LJO-BAM Document 45 Filed 07/13/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AEDPA to this proceeding and to specified decisions of the

California courts. Specifically, Respondent failed to submit

briefing on the following issues that are set forth in the FAP

(referred to by the argument headings as they appear in the table

of contents of the FAP): Introductory allegations, points B, C,

and D concerning the validity or applicability of the AEDPA;

claim I(D) concerning the applicability of the AEDPA; claim II(B)

concerning the applicability of the AEDPA; claim III(D)

concerning the applicability of the AEDPA; and claim IV(B)(3)

concerning the applicability of the AEDPA and § 2254. 

Respondent is DIRECTED to file a formal supplemental brief

fully addressing each of these issues no later than thirty (30)

days after the date of service of this order.

Petitioner may FILE a responsive supplemental brief no later

than twenty (20) days after the date of service of Respondent’s

supplemental brief. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 13, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

10c20k UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00322-LJO-BAM Document 45 Filed 07/13/12 Page 2 of 2