Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00916/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00916-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK HUERTA, 

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

M. D. BITER, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:13-cv-0916 AWI EJP (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 15.)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH 

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A 

CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY 

BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT 

TO 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g)

ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

Mark Huerta (Aplaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 10, 2015, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 

this action be dismissed based on plaintiff=s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be 

granted under §1983. Plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file objections to the 

findings and recommendations. Plaintiff requested and was granted two thirty-day extensions 

of time to file objections. (Docs. 16, 17, 18, 19.) Plaintiff’s deadlines have now expired, and

as of the date of this order, no objections have been filed.

Case 1:13-cv-00916-AWI-EPG Document 21 Filed 10/29/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 

analysis. Plaintiff has not adequately alleged deliberate indifference by any defendant, cf.

Nguyen v. Biter, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119406 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2015), nor has he 

demonstrated an injury.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 

10, 2015, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on plaintiff=s failure to state a 

claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983;

3. This dismissal is subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. '

1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011); and

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 29, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00916-AWI-EPG Document 21 Filed 10/29/15 Page 2 of 2