Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00206/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00206-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 18:4208(B) Agency Action Review

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation Re: Extension of Time for Defendant Toys ‘R’ Us 

to Respond to Complaint

Vogel v. Toys ‘R’ Us – Delaware, Inc., et al.

Case No. 1:16-CV-00206-LJO-SMS

SCOTTLYNN J. HUBBARD IV (SBN 212970)

KHUSHPREET R. MEHTON (SBN 276827)

DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC

12 Williamsburg Lane

Chico, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Facsimile: (530) 894-8244

Email: usdccentral@hubslaw.Com

KRMehton@HubsLaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARTIN VOGEL

JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

NATHAN W. AUSTIN (SBN 219672)

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 160

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 341-0404

Facsimile: (916) 341-0141

Email: austinn@jacksonlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant

TOYS ‘R’ US – DELAWARE, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MARTIN VOGEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOYS ‘R’ US – DELAWARE, INC. dba 

BABIES ‘R’ US #9573; GIRAFFE 

PROPERTIES, LLC,

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 1:16-CV-00206-LJO-SMS

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF 

TIME UNTIL APRIL 29, 2016 FOR 

DEFENDANT TOYS ‘R’ US –

DELAWARE, INC. TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON

Pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff MARTIN VOGEL and Defendant TOYS ‘R’ US –

DELAWARE, INC., by and through their respective attorneys of record, Scottlynn J. 

Hubbard, IV and Khushpreet R. Mehton; Nathan W. Austin, stipulate as follows:

1. One previous extension of time has been obtained.

2. The other Defendant in this case, TOYS “R” US PROPERTY COMPANY II, 

LLC erroneously sued and served as GIRAFFE PROPERTIES, LLC, was first served with the 

summons and complaint on March 16, 2016. 

Case 1:16-cv-00206-LJO-SMS Document 10 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation Re: Extension of Time for Defendant Toys ‘R’ Us 

to Respond to Complaint

Vogel v. Toys ‘R’ Us – Delaware, Inc., et al.

Case No. 1:16-CV-00206-LJO-SMS

3. The parties have actively engaged in settlement negotiations, and this extension is 

requested to allow the parties to continue to engage in settlement negotiations.

4. Defendant TOYS ‘R’ US – DELAWARE, INC.’s response will be due no later 

than April 29, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of April 6, 2016.

Dated: April 6, 2016 DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC

By: /s/ Scottlynn J. Hubbard IV___________________

SCOTTLYNN J. HUBBARD, IV

KHUSHPREET R. MEHTON

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARTIN VOGEL

Dated: April 6, 2016 JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

By: /s/ Nathan W. Austin

NATHAN W. AUSTIN

Attorneys for Defendant

TOYS ‘R’ US – DELAWARE, INC.

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS SO ORDERED:

1. The aforementioned extension of time is GRANTED;

2. Defendant TOYS ‘R’ US – DELAWARE, INC.’s response will be due no later 

than April 29, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 7, 2016 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00206-LJO-SMS Document 10 Filed 04/07/16 Page 2 of 2