Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-6_06-cv-06019/USCOURTS-arwd-6_06-cv-06019-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HOT SPRINGS DIVISION

JUDE SHELTON PLAINTIFF

vs. Civil No. 06-6019

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Now on this 15th day of August, 2006, there is pending before the undersigned, the

Commissioner’s Motion To Remand, filed herein on August 10, 2006, by the Commissioner of

Social Security (hereinafter "Commissioner") (Doc. #10). Plaintiff does not oppose the

Commissioner’s motion.

In the instant motion, the Commissioner asserts that reversal of her decision, and remand

of this matter, are necessary: "in order that an ALJ can further evaluate the effect of Plaintiff’s

nonexertional limitations upon his residual functional capacity, and, if necessary, to obtain

testimony from a vocational expert to determine if there are jobs existing is significant numbers

in the national economy which Plaintiff can perform." (Doc. #10, p. 1). 

Sentence four provides:

The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and

transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or

reversing the decision of the [Commissioner], with or without

remanding the cause for a rehearing.

42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Accordingly, we conclude that the Commissioner’s motion requesting reversal of the

decision and remand, is well taken. The Commissioner’s decision is reversed and this matter is

Case 6:06-cv-06019-JRM Document 11 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

-2-

remanded for further hearing, pursuant to sentence four, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further

proceedings, as specifically set forth above and in the Commissioner’s motion (Doc. #10).

In addition, the undersigned finds that the Plaintiff’s Complaint should be and hereby is

dismissed without prejudice to the subsequent filing for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal

Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. A separate Judgment shall be entered herein pursuant

to F.R.Civ.P. 58 and 52.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Bobby E. Shepherd 

Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 6:06-cv-06019-JRM Document 11 Filed 08/15/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>