Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05397/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05397-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER LEE JENKINS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JONES, et. al., 

Defendants.

 /

CV F 02 5397 OWW SMS P

ORDER CONSTRUING MOTION TO

DISMISS AS NOTICE OF INTENT NOT TO

FILE SIXTH AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc.

44.) 

Christopher Lee Jenkins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On June 20, 2005, Plaintiff filed a pleading titled “Motion to Dismiss” in which he

informs the Court that he has filed a Fifth Amended Complaint and that if his claims are not

found cognizable he does not wish to file a Sixth Amended Complaint but instead wishes to

dismiss the action. As the Court has yet to screen the Complaint and it is not Plaintiff’s true

intention to have the action dismissed at this time, the Court will CONSTRUE the Motion to

Dismiss as a Notice of Plaintiff’s intent not to file a Sixth Amended Complaint. Accordingly,

Case 1:02-cv-05397-LJO -SMS Document 45 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court HEREBY ORDERS: 

1. The Motion to Dismiss is CONSTRUED as a Notice of Intent Not To File Sixth

Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 15, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05397-LJO -SMS Document 45 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2