Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05321/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05321-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANTOS MATOS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PEREZ, et al, 

Defendant. 

 /

1:04-cv-05321-AWI-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 33)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 26)

Plaintiff Santos Matos, Jr., (“Plaintiff”) is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On July 26, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations that recommended the court grant Defendants’

motion to dismiss and dismiss this action for Plaintiff’s failure

to exhaust all administrative remedies prior to filing suit. The

Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. 

Case 1:04-cv-05321-AWI-LJO Document 36 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 No party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT

IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 26, 2006,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss, filed November 21, 2005,

is GRANTED; and

3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for

Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust the available

administrative remedies prior to filing suit; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05321-AWI-LJO Document 36 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2