Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02439/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02439-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

NO. C 10-02439 RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

*E-Filed 08/03/2010* 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JASON RIVERA, an individual; and 

MIKALA RIVERA, an individual, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., et 

al., 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/ 

CASE NO. C 10-02439 RS

ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING 

ON MOTION TO DISMISS 

Plaintiffs Jason and Mikala Rivera filed their Complaint on June 2, 2010 alleging thirteen 

claims for relief. On June 28, 2010, defendants BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Bank of 

America, N.A., as successor in interest to Countrywide Bank, N.A., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 

and ReconTrust Company, N.A. filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint. A hearing on the 

motion to dismiss was set for August 5, 2010. 

Plaintiffs have not filed a response to the motion to dismiss, but instead filed a First 

Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on August 3, 2010. In light of the filing of the FAC, the hearing date 

of August 5, 2010 is continued until September 2, 2010 at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 3, 17th floor, 

United States Courthouse, San Francisco, California. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: 

1) Defendants may, but are not required to, supplement their motion to dismiss in response 

to the FAC. Any supplemental briefing by defendants is due by August 12, 2010. 

Case 3:10-cv-02439-RS Document 21 Filed 08/03/10 Page 1 of 2
NO. C 10-00805 RS 

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

2) Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion to dismiss is due by August 19, 2010. 

3) Any reply to plaintiffs’ opposition is due by August 26, 2010. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 08/03/2010 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:10-cv-02439-RS Document 21 Filed 08/03/10 Page 2 of 2