Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01326/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01326-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND WRIGHT,

Plaintiff, 1: 05 CV 1326 OWW WMW PC 

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

SERGEANT GONZALES,

Defendant.

Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility at Corcoran, brings this civil rights

action against Defendant Sergeant Gonzales, A Correctional Sergeant employed by the CDCR at

Pleasant Valley State Prison. 

On June 19, 2008, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that this

action be dismissed. The recommendation was based on Plaintiff’s failure to allege that the

disciplinary conviction that he is challenging has been invalidated. Plaintiff filed objections to

the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff indicates that he has other claims in his first

amended complaint. The first amended complaint refers to several individuals, but failed to

identify any particular defendants. 

On July 15, 2008, an order was entered, advising Plaintiff that he needed to identify

individual defendants, and charge them with specific conduct. The court specifically found that

Case 1:05-cv-01326-AWI-JLT Document 29 Filed 09/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

the first amended complaint failed to state a claim for relief. In that order, the court dismissed

the first amended complaint and granted Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint. 

Plaintiff failed to do so. The court therefore recommends dismissal without prejudice, pursuant

to Local Rule 11-110, for failure to obey a court order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice for failure to obey a court order.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9 Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the th

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2008 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01326-AWI-JLT Document 29 Filed 09/15/08 Page 2 of 2