Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00383/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00383-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GILBERTO JUAREZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0383 LKK KJM P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed July 1, 2005 plaintiff was ordered to submit an in forma pauperis

affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do

so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. On January 30, 2006, the

court granted plaintiff thirty additional days to comply with the July 1, 2005 order.

On February 24, 2006, plaintiff filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis but

plaintiff failed to have the “certificate” portion completed by an officer at his institution. 

Plaintiff was instructed in the July 1, 2005 order that the “certificate” portion must be completed. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action

be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

Case 2:05-cv-00383-LKK -KJM Document 22 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 25, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

juar0383.fifp

Case 2:05-cv-00383-LKK -KJM Document 22 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 2