Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01283/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01283-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Issac Abdi Hashi, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Department

of Homeland Security; Katrina S. Kane,

Field Office Director for Immigration and

Customs Enforcement, 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 07-1283-PHX-FJM (DKD)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

TO THE HONORABLE FREDERICK J. MARTONE, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE:

On June 28, 2007, Issac Abdi Hashi filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging

that immigration officials are holding him in detention pending his removal to Somalia, but

that his removal cannot be effected. In his petition, he argues that he is entitled to immediate

release from custody because his indefinite detention with no prospect that his removal will

be effected in the reasonably foreseeable future is not authorized by law. See Zadvydas v.

Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). The Court issued a Notice of Assignment on that date, a copy

of which was mailed to Hashi, in which he was warned that failure to file a Notice of Change

of Address would result in the case being dismissed (Doc. #2). On August 22, 2007, the

Court ordered Respondents to answer the petition within 20 days of the date of service (Doc.

#4). On August 28, 2007, a copy of the Court’s August 22 Order sent to Hashi at the Service

Case 2:07-cv-01283-FJM Document 9 Filed 09/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Processing Center in Florence, Arizona was returned as undeliverable, “unable to

forward”(Doc. #6).

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Issac Abdi Hashi’s petition for writ

of habeas corpus be DISMISSED (Doc. #1).

This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth

Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of

Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district court’s judgment. The

parties shall have ten days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. See, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Rules

72, 6(a), 6(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Thereafter, the parties have ten days within

which to file a response to the objections. Failure timely to file objections to the Magistrate

Judge's Report and Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the Report and

Recommendation by the district court without further review. See United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Failure timely to file objections to any factual

determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered a waiver of a party’s right to

appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the

Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. See Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 11th day of September, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-01283-FJM Document 9 Filed 09/12/07 Page 2 of 2