Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-01084/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-01084-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 4:19-cv-01084-HSG 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 

4820-8340-9048v.1 0036234-000791 

Jason W. Estavillo (CA SBN 188093) 

Caitlin M. Phair (CA SBN 306685) 

LAW OFFICES OF JASON ESTAVILLO 

1330 Broadway, Suite 501 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 982-3001 

Facsimile: (510) 982-3002 

Email: jason@estavillolaw.com 

 caitlin@estavillolaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

HAROLD P. REILAND JR. and 

MELINDA P. REILAND 

Joseph E. Addiego III (CA SBN 169522) 

Monder Khoury (CA SBN 312949) 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 276-6500 

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 

Email: joeaddiego@dwt.com 

 mikekhoury@dwt.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

HAROLD P. REILAND JR. and MELINDA P. 

REILAND, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; CLEAR 

RECON CORP.; and DOES 1-20, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 4:19-cv-01084-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING DEFENDANT JPMORGAN 

CHASE BANK, N.A.’S DEADLINE TO 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ 

COMPLAINT 

Civ. L.R. 6-1(b) & 7-12 

Case 4:19-cv-01084-HSG Document 23 Filed 05/29/19 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Case No. 4:19-cv-01084-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 

4820-8340-9048v.1 0036234-000791 

Per Civil Local Rule 6-1(b) and 7-12, Plaintiffs Harold P. Reiland Jr. and Melinda P. 

Reiland (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate 

for an additional extension of time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. 

The Complaint was filed on February 11, 2019 in the Superior Court for Contra Costa 

County, and served on Defendant on February 11, 2019. 

Defendant removed the matter to this court on February 27, 2019. 

On March 4, 2019, the Parties stipulated to a 30-day extension for Defendant to file a 

response to the Complaint from March 7, 2019 to April 8, 2019 [Dkt 7]. 

On April 5, 2019, the Parties stipulated to an additional 45-day extension for Defendant to 

file a response to the Complaint from April 8, 2019 to May 23, 2019 [Dkt 14]. 

Thereafter, Plaintiffs’ counsel, Ms. Phair, went on bereavement leave and was unavailable 

for several weeks. Ms. Phair has now returned from bereavement leave and the parties have 

resumed discussion to resolve this matter and are hopeful they will reach a resolution shortly. 

In order to conserve judicial resources while the Parties continue to discuss resolution of 

this matter, the Parties hereby stipulate to an additional 45-day extension of Defendant’s deadline 

to respond to the Complaint, from May 23, 2019 to July 8, 2019. 

No other deadlines will be impacted by this stipulation. 

DATED: May 28, 2019. LAW OFFICES OF JASON ESTAVILLO 

By: /s/Caitlin M. Phair Jason W. Estavillo 

Caitlin M. Phair 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

HAROLD P. REILAND JR. and MELINDA P. 

REILAND 

DATED: May 28, 2019 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

By: /s/Monder Khoury Joseph E. Addiego III 

 Monder Khoury 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

Case 4:19-cv-01084-HSG Document 23 Filed 05/29/19 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 Case No. 4:19-cv-01084-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 

4820-8340-9048v.1 0036234-000791 

FILER’S ATTESTATION 

I, Monder Khoury, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to 

file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Granting Additional Extension of Time for Defendant 

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint on behalf of Plaintiffs Harold P. 

Reiland Jr. and Melinda P. Reiland and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. In compliance 

with L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Plaintiffs’ counsel Jason W. Estavillo and Caitlin M. Phair 

concurs in this filing. 

DATED: May 28, 2019 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

Joseph E. Addiego III 

Monder Khoury 

By: /s/Monder Khoury 

 Joseph E. Addiego III 

 Monder Khoury 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 

ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, that Defendant JPMorgan Chase 

Bank, N.A.’s deadline to respond to Plaintiffs Harold P. Reiland Jr. and Melinda P. Reiland’s 

Complaint is extended from May 23, 2019 to July 8, 2019. 

Dated: May 29, 2019 ______________________________________ 

JUDGE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

 

Case 4:19-cv-01084-HSG Document 23 Filed 05/29/19 Page 3 of 3