Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-123/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL No. 1917

Case No. C-07-5944-SC

ORDER GRANTING DIRECT 

PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS'

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SEAL DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 and 

79-5(d)

This Order Relates To:

INDIRECT-PURCHASER ACTIONS

On May 14, 2013, the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs ("DPP") filed

an Administrative Motion to Seal Documents Pursuant to Civil Local 

Rules 7-11 and 79-5(d). ECF No. 1673 ("DPP Mot."). Local Rule 79-

5(d) requires plaintiffs to move to file under seal documents 

containing confidential information, after which the defendants who 

designated such information as confidential will have seven days to 

file declarations explaining why the material should be sealed. In 

response to the DPP Motion, the SDI Defendants, the Hitachi 

Defendants, Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., the Panasonic 

Defendants, the Philips Defendants, and the Toshiba Defendants and 

all filed declarations under Rule 79-5(d).1

 

1 Respectively, these declarations appear as follows: ECF Nos. 1680 

("SDI Decl."), 1682 ("Hitachi Decl."), 1684 ("Chunghwa Decl.", 1685 

("Panasonic Decl."), 1688 ("Philips Decl."), 1689 ("Toshiba 

Decl."). 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1698 Filed 05/29/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

For good cause shown, and having considered the aforementioned 

Defendants' declarations, the Court GRANTS the DPP Motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 29, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1698 Filed 05/29/13 Page 2 of 2