Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06663/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06663-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Contitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. & [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Answer and Respond No. CIV F-04-6663 REC LJO

1.

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

MARY E. HACKENBRACHT 

Senior Assistant Attorney General 

ELLEN M. PETER

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

CARYN L. CRAIG

NICHOLAS STERN

Deputy Attorneys General

1300 "I" Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

MARC N. MELNICK, State Bar No. 168187

Deputy Attorney General

1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor

P.O. Box 70550

Oakland, CA 94612-0550

Telephone: (510) 622-2133

Fax: (510) 622-2270

Attorneys for Defendant Catherine E. Witherspoon

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

CENTRAL VALLEY CHRYSLER-JEEP,

INC.; et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CATHERINE E. WITHERSPOON,

Defendant.

NO. CIV F-04-6663 REC LJO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

ANSWER AND RESPONSE

Judge: Hon. Robert E.

Coyle

Magistrate: Hon. Lawrence J.

O’Neill

WHEREAS, on October 21, 2005, the Court issued orders denying defendant

Witherspoon’s motion to dismiss and granting the three motions to intervene; 

WHEREAS, defendant Witherspoon’s answer to Plaintiffs’ first amended

complaint is due November 4, 2005, and defendant Witherspoon’s response to PlaintiffIntervenor Association of International Automobile Manufacturers’ complaint-in-intervention is

Case 1:04-cv-06663-AWI-GSA Document 146 Filed 11/04/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. & [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Answer and Respond No. CIV F-04-6663 REC LJO

2.

due November 10, 2005. 

WHEREAS, defendant Witherspoon has requested a short extension of the time to

answer the first amended complaint and respond to the complaint-in-intervention, and none of

the parties have any objection to those extensions, provided this extension does not affect the

overall scheduling of this action; 

ACCORDINGLY, the parties stipulate and agree as follows:

A. The time for defendant Witherspoon to answer the first amended complaint is

extended to November 15, 2005.

B. The time for defendant Witherspoon to respond to the complaint-in-intervention is

extended to November 15, 2005. 

Dated: 11/2/05

/s/ Andrew B. Clubok (as authorized on 11/2/05)

ANDREW B. CLUBOK

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: 11/3/05

/s/ Marc N. Melnick 

MARC N. MELNICK

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendant

Dated: 11/2/05

/s/ Charles H. Haake (as authorized on 11/2/05) 

CHARLES H. HAAKE

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor

Association of International Automobile

Manufacturers

Dated: 11/1/05

/s/ Bernice Conn (as authorized on 11/1/05) 

BERNICE CONN

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.

Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors Sierra

Club, Natural Resources Defense Council,

and Environmental Defense

Case 1:04-cv-06663-AWI-GSA Document 146 Filed 11/04/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. & [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Answer and Respond No. CIV F-04-6663 REC LJO

3.

Dated: 11/2/05

/s/ Danielle R. Fugere (as authorized on 11/2/05)

DANIELLE R. FUGERE

Bluewater Network

Attorney for Defendant-Intervenors

Bluewater Network, Global Exchange, and

Rainforest Action Network

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 3, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06663-AWI-GSA Document 146 Filed 11/04/05 Page 3 of 3