Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03717/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03717-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

MCDERMOTT

WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Continue Hearing of 

Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees CASE NO. C 06-3717 

TERRENCE P. MCMAHON (State Bar No. 71910) 

tmcmahon@mwe.com 

ANTHONY DE ALCUAZ (State Bar No. 65599) 

adealcuaz@mwe.com 

ROBERT J. BLANCH (State Bar No. 189632) 

rblanch@mwe.com 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 813-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 813-5100 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

GARTH A. WINN, ESQ. (pro hac vice) 

garth.winn@klarquist.com 

JEFFREY S. LOVE, ESQ. (pro hac vice) 

jeffrey.love@klarquist.com 

KLARQUIST SPARKMAN LLP 

One World Trade Center 

121 S.W. Salmon Street, Ste. 1600 

Portland, Oregon 97204 

Main (503)-595-5300 

Fax (503)-595-5301 

Attorneys for Defendants 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES 

AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED and 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

INTERNATIONAL GAME 

TECHNOLOGY and IGT, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 06-3717 (MJJ) 

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING OF

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

ATTORNEYS’ FEES FROM JANUARY 9,

2008 TO JANUARY 16, 2008

Date: January 9, 2008

Time : 9:30 a.m.

Courtroom: Courtroom 11, 19th Floor

Judge: Mag. Judge James Larson

Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 404 Filed 12/06/07 Page 1 of 2
MCDERMOTT

WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Continue Hearing of 

Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees - 2 - CASE NO. C 06-3717 

In view of scheduling conflicts of Aristocrat’s counsel - including oral argument in the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit scheduled for January 8, 2008, in the case 

styled Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v. International Game Technology, 2007-1419 - 

the parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to continue the 

hearing on defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees, currently scheduled for January 9, 2008, to 

January 16, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: December 3, 2007 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

By:/s/ Anthony de Alcuaz 

 Anthony de Alcuaz 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES 

AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED and 

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

 

Dated: December 3, 2007 KLARQUIST SPARKMAN LLP 

By:/s/ Jeffrey S. Love____________________ 

 Jeffrey S. Love 

Attorneys for Defendants 

INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY, 

INC. AND IGT 

ORDER

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ____________________________ _____________________________ 

 Chief Magistrate Judge 

 James Larson 

MPK 135809-2.074272.0016 

12-6-07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Larson

Case 5:06-cv-03717-RMW Document 404 Filed 12/06/07 Page 2 of 2