Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01454/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01454-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERNEST P. SANCHEZ, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

No. CIV. S-09-1454 FCD DAD

v.

AVIVA LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY,

a foreign entity of unknown origin; ORDER OF NON-RELATED CASES 

LOOMIS WEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., an 

Illinois corporation; LAWRENCE LELAND 

LOOMIS, an individual; et al., 

Defendants.

________________________________/

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff,

No. CIV. S-10-0458 MCE KJN 

v.

LAWRENCE “LEE” LOOMIS, LOOMIS

WEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC., JOHN 

HAGENER, and LISMAR FINANCIAL

SERVICES, LLC.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

The undersigned judge declines to relate the above-captioned cases pursuant to Local

Rule 123(a). Assignment of the matters to the same judge is not likely to effect a substantial

savings of judicial effort or other economies. These actions involve the same or similar

defendants, but the actions involve events specific to each party, the questions of fact are 

Case 2:09-cv-01454-KJM-DAD Document 107 Filed 08/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

different, the questions of law are not novel, it is not clear that the same result should follow in

these actions, and assignment to different judges would not entail substantial duplication of

labor.

Therefore, CIV. S-10-0458 MCE KJN shall not be reassigned to the undersigned judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 25, 2010 

Case 2:09-cv-01454-KJM-DAD Document 107 Filed 08/25/10 Page 2 of 2