Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-284/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO COMPEL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

KAREN G. JOHNSON-MCKEWAN (SBN 121570)

kjohnson-mckewan@orrick.com

ANNETTE L. HURST (SBN 148738)

ahurst@orrick.com

GABRIEL M. RAMSEY (SBN 209218)

gramsey@orrick.com

405 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94105

Tel: 1.415.773.5700 / Fax: 1.415.773.5759

PETER A. BICKS (pro hac vice)

pbicks@orrick.com

LISA T. SIMPSON (pro hac vice)

lsimpson@orrick.com

51 West 52nd Street, New York, NY 10019

Tel: 1.212.506.5000 / Fax: 1.212.506.5151

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

DAVID BOIES (pro hac vice)

dboies@bsfllp.com

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

Tel: 1.914.749.8200 / Fax: 1.914.749.8300

STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177)

sholtzman@bsfllp.com

1999 Harrison St., Ste. 900, Oakland, CA 94612

Tel: 1.510.874.1000 / Fax: 1.510.874.1460

ORACLE CORPORATION

DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049)

dorian.daley@oracle.com

DEBORAH K. MILLER (SBN 95527)

deborah.miller@oracle.com

MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (SBN 211600)

matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com

RUCHIKA AGRAWAL (SBN 246058)

ruchika.agrawal@oracle.com

500 Oracle Parkway,

Redwood City, CA 94065

Tel: 650.506.5200 / Fax: 650.506.7117

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO COMPEL

[DKT. 1403 AND 1413]

Dept. Courtroom 8, 19th Fl.

Judge: Hon. William Alsup

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1417 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO COMPEL 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Order of December 24, 2015 (Dkt. 1407), on

January 5, 2016 the parties met and conferred further regarding Oracle’s Motion to Compel

Compliance and for Sanctions (Dkt. 1403);

WHEREAS, during the parties’ January 5, 2016 meet and confer, the parties agreed to a

compromise designed to resolve both that Motion and another of Oracle’s pending discovery

motions, the Motion to Compel Deposition Topics 2-4 and 8 (Dkt. 1413); and

WHEREAS, Google states that it has agreed to this compromise in an effort to informally

resolve discovery disputes without agreeing with the merits of Oracle’s pending motions.

THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed as follows:

1. Oracle withdraws its pending Motion to Compel as to the Deposition Topic 8 as

discussed in Dkt. 1413 and this stipulation hereby resolves Oracle’s pending motion to compel

compliance and for sanctions (Dkt. 1403) and its pending motion to compel on Deposition

Topics 2-4 (Dkt. 1413).

2. Google will produce the documents that are senior-executive level presentations

that have been a subject of Oracle’s pending Motion to Compel Compliance and for Sanctions

(Dkt. 1403), as discussed by the parties. For those presentations to be produced that postdate

2013, Google may redact material that it contends to be non-relevant or otherwise protected from

production, but Oracle reserves the right to contest any such redactions in a single additional

motion to compel, and this opportunity to challenge the redactions is a condition of this

stipulation. Google will complete production of the additional documents by January 15, 2016.

In the event that a dispute arises regarding Google’s redactions, the parties will promptly meet

and confer, and any motion contesting the redactions must be filed by January 22, 2016.

2. After the documents discussed in paragraph 1 above are produced, Google will

present the following two Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses to testify regarding financial information, as

well as information within the scope of Topics 2, 3, and 4 of Oracle’s Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition

Notice to Google (dated November 2, 2015): (a) a financial witness will be produced to testify

for up to 3.5 hours, and (ii) Jim Kolotourous from Google’s Global Business Group will be

produced to testify for up to 5 hours. Google will prepare the witnesses to testify consistent with

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1417 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO COMPEL 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Judge Alsup’s standing order regarding Rule 30(b)(6) deposition preparation, Dkt. 26 at § 23, but

Google does not represent that these witnesses have knowledge about the full scope of Topics 2

through 4. Oracle withdraws its demand for additional 30(b)(6) testimony with respect to Topic

8.

3. These additional depositions shall be completed by January 30, 2016, and any

further motion to compel regarding any asserted inadequacy of that testimony shall be filed by

February 8, 2016.

Dated: January 6, 2015

ANNETTE L. HURST

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

By: /s/ Annette L. Hurst

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.

Dated: January 6, 2015

CHRISTA ANDERSON

Keker & Van Nest LLP

By: /s/ Christa Anderson

Attorneys for Defendant

GOOGLE INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The foregoing stipulation is approved, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date:______________ ___________________________________________

Hon. William Alsup

Judge of the United States District Court

January 6, 2016.

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1417 Filed 01/07/16 Page 3 of 3