Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04959/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04959-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Amitai Schwartz (CSB #55187)

Lisa Sitkin (CSB #194127)

Law Offices of Amitai Schwartz

2000 Powell Street, Suite 1286

Emeryville, CA 94608

(510) 597-1775 (voice)

(510) 597-0957 (fax)

email: attorneys@schwartzlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs,

 PSG Properties and Support, Inc.

 and Frank Costanzo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PSG PROPERTIES AND SUPPORT,

INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF LAKE, CALIFORNIA,

et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CV-04-4959 CRB EMC

Further Stipulation and Order Re:

Stay and Environmental Study

Hon. Edward M. Chen

United States Magistrate Judge

A further settlement conference was held in this matter by telephone with

the Hon. Edward M. Chen, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 11, 2005. 

Amitai Schwartz represented plaintiffs; Gary Lepper represented defendants.

Consistent with their agreement during the conference on October 11, 2005,

the parties agreed, subject to the approval of the Court, to modify the stipulation

and order previously filed on May 23, 2005, as follows:

1. That, in order to provide time for preparation of the report

contemplated by the parties and to reduce the expense of the litigation, inter-party

discovery will be stayed and enforcement, direct or indirect, by Lake County

against plaintiff for lack of a use permit will not be undertaken through and

Case 3:04-cv-04959-CRB Document 23 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

including April 30, 2006, subject to further extension by mutual agreement and

approval of the Court.

 2. That, the report contemplated by the parties may take any form

acceptable to the County of Lake and need not meet all requirements of a focused

EIR, provided it is otherwise acceptable.

3. That, the parties will request, at the case management conference on

November 4, 2005, that the Court accommodate both parties’ agreed six month

stay to allow preparation and submission of the report.

It is so stipulated.

Dated: October 13, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF AMITAI SCHWARTZ

 /s/ 

Amitai Schwartz

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: October 13, 2005 LEPPER & HARRINGTON

 /s/ 

Gary M. Lepper

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

It is so ordered.

Dated: 

 Edward M. Chen

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-04959-CRB Document 23 Filed 10/19/05 Page 2 of 2