Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01222/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01222-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID FALLON,

Plaintiff, 2:06-cv-1222-GEB-KJM-PS

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled actions. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On July 27, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed objections

to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-01222-GEB -KJM Document 5 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 27, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b). 

Dated: September 8, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01222-GEB -KJM Document 5 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 2