Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_06-cv-00951/USCOURTS-ared-4_06-cv-00951-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1 The documents’ discoverability apparently is moot because they were attached to the

response, which was submitted neither as sealed nor in camera.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

DECEUNINCK NORTH AMERICA LLC PLAINTIFF

V. NO. 4:06cv00951 JMM

BAVARIAN POLYMERS USA, INC., et al DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Defendants have filed their second supplemental response to the Court’s orders of

July 22, July 31, and August 6, 2008. The submittal includes the required Menegazzo

affidavit and hard copies of documents 589 and 725.

Documents 589 and 725 are product utilization reports for the year 2006, containing

information as to materials, scrap, working days, etc. and, as Defendants previously

asserted, do not appear to contain relevant information.1

I believe this filing ties all loose ends arising from the discovery motions filed to this

date. If I have overlooked any issues, the parties should bring this to my attention. Also,

on or before August 5, 2008, the parties should tell the Court when they expect to complete

the discovery process, so that a date can be set for hearing before Judge Moody. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of August, 2008.

 

 __________________________________

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 4:06-cv-00951-JMM Document 146 Filed 08/19/08 Page 1 of 1