Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06907/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06907-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Tolosko-Parker, Castro, et al., v. City of Sonoma, et al. (Nos. C-06-6841-CRB & C-06-6907-CRB)

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINITFFS ROBERT F. CASTRO, JR., ANNA MARIA

CASTRO, AND DOUGLAS RICHEY; AND, TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Russell A. Robinson, 163937

Law Office of Russell A. Robinson, APC

345 Grove Street

First Floor

San Francisco CA 94102

TEL: 415.255.0462

FAX: 415.431.4526

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ROBERT F. CASTRO, JR., ANNA MARIA

CASTRO, and DOUGLAS RICHEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALANE TOLOSKO-PARKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________

ROBERT F. CASTRO, JR., ANNA MARIA

CASTRO, and DOUGLAS RICHEY,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF SONOMA, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-06-6841-CRB

No. C-06-6907-CRB

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FILED BY

PLAINITFFS ROBERT F. CASTRO, JR.,

ANNA MARIA CASTRO, AND DOUGLAS

RICHEY; AND, TO CONTINUE INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

[Jury Trial Demanded]

Date: April 20, 2007

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

/ / /

Case 3:06-cv-06907-CRB Document 14 Filed 05/11/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Tolosko-Parker, Castro, et al., v. City of Sonoma, et al. (Nos. C-06-6841-CRB & C-06-6907-CRB)

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINITFFS ROBERT F. CASTRO, JR., ANNA MARIA

CASTRO, AND DOUGLAS RICHEY; AND, TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

- 2 -

COME NOW Plaintiffs Robert F. Castro, Jr., Anna Maria Castro, and Douglas Richey,

with Defendants City of Sonoma, Sonoma County Sheriff Bill Cogbill, County of Sonoma,

Sonoma County Sheriff Department, Sonoma Chief of Police Paul Day, Sonoma Police

Department, Officer Patrick Sharp, Officer Travis Koeppel, Officer Patrick Sharp, Deputy

Sheriff Ricky Bostic, Deputy James Munro, and Deputy Jack Vivian, through counsel, to hereby

stipulate as follows:

All Defendants named in the Complaint of Plaintiffs Robert F. Castro, Jr., Anna Maria

Castro, and Douglas Richey have been served, with some initial responses due on about April

18, 2007. Counsel for said Defendants has met and conferred with counsel for Plaintiffs Robert

F. Castro, Jr., Anna Maria Castro, and Douglas Richey.

Defendants’ counsel has informed these stipulating Plaintiffs’ counsel that her clients

have not been served by or on behalf of Plaintiff Alane Tolosko-Parker; counsel for these

stipulating Plaintiffs has informed Defendants’ counsel that he does not represent and does not

know who, if anybody, is in fact representing Plaintiff Alane Tolosko-Parker at the present time.

The parties hereto have agreed to continue the meet and confer process over what the

defense perceives to be deficiencies in the Complaint filed November 6, 2006. Counsel agree

that said Defendants’ initial response to these Plaintiffs’ Complaint shall be filed on or before

May 9, 2007, if the parties cannot resolve the issues through further meet and confer efforts.

The parties to this stipulation thereupon also stipulate and agree that the initial case

management conference by continued until June 22, 2007, with the joint case management

conference statement to be filed on or before June 12, 2007. Further, the parties hereto agree

that hearing on any motion to dismiss shall also be on June 22, 2007, or as soon thereafter as the

Court may hear said motion.

/ / /

Case 3:06-cv-06907-CRB Document 14 Filed 05/11/07 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-06907-CRB Document 14 Filed 05/11/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Tolosko-Parker, Castro, et al., v. City of Sonoma, et al. (Nos. C-06-6841-CRB & C-06-6907-CRB)

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINITFFS ROBERT F. CASTRO, JR., ANNA MARIA

CASTRO, AND DOUGLAS RICHEY; AND, TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

- 4 -

ORDER

Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Stipulating Defendants’ initial response to these Plaintiffs’ Complaint shall be filed on or

before May 9, 2007, if the parties cannot resolve the issues through meet and confer efforts, with

hearing of said motion on ___________, 2007.

The initial case management conference is hereby continued to ___________, 2007, with

the joint case management conference statement to be filed on or before ___________, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: April ___, 2007 

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

United States District Court, Northern Dist. Of Cal.

June 22 June 22 June 15 May 11, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

10:00 am

Case 3:06-cv-06907-CRB Document 14 Filed 05/11/07 Page 4 of 4