Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-94/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL

CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MEDIATEK, INC., et al.,

Defendants

 

MEDIATEK, INC,

Counterclaimant,

 v.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL

CO., LTD., et al.

Counterclaim Defendants /

No. 05-3148 MMC 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

EMERGENCY MOTION; VACATING IN

PART “ORDER DENYING IN PART

DEFERRED PORTION OF PLAINTIFF’S

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE

DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL” (DOCKET

# 1091); GRANTING IN PART

DEFERRED PORTION OF PLAINTIFF’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

Before the Court is defendants’ “Unopposed Emergency Motion in Response to

Order Denying Motion to File Under Seal and Request for an Extension of Time to File a

Declaration Pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d),” filed May 17, 2007, supported by the

Declaration of Randall T. Garteiser.

Good cause appearing from the Declaration of Randall T. Garteiser, defendants’

emergency motion is hereby GRANTED, as follows:

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1107 Filed 05/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

In all other respects, said order remains in effect.

2

Plaintiff’s motion remains under submission, to the extent the motion seeks leave to

file under seal documents containing matter assertedly designated as confidential by thirdparties.

2

1. The Court’s “Order Denying in Part Deferred Portion of Plaintiff’s Administrative

Request to File Document Under Seal; Directions to Clerk,” filed May 16, 2007 (Docket #

1091), is hereby VACATED to the extent said order pertains to Exhibits 5, 7, 8, and 11 to

the Declaration of Aldo A. Badini in Support of Matsushita’s Reply in Support of its Motion

for Summary Judgment;1 and

2. Plaintiff’s administrative motion to file under seal documents submitted in support

of plaintiff’s reply in support of its motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED in

part,2 to the extent said motion pertains to the following documents, each of which the Clerk

is DIRECTED to file under seal:

a. Exhibits 5, 7, 8, and 11 to the Declaration of Aldo A. Badini;

b. Matsushita’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment; and

c. Response to Mediatek’s Objections to Evidence.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1107 Filed 05/18/07 Page 2 of 2