Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03677/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03677-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

{00260087v1} _________-1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. C 07-03677 EDL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERT J. YORIO (SBN 93178) 

ryorio@carrferrell.com 

V. RANDALL GARD (SBN 151677) 

rgard@carrferrell.com 

CHRISTOPHER P. GREWE (SBN 245938) 

cgrewe@carrferrell.com 

CARR & FERRELL LLP 

2200 Geng Road 

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 812-3400 

Facsimile: (650) 812-3444 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARK L. MCHUGH 

STEVEN H. LYVERSE 

steve.lyverse@slugger.com 

HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO. 

800 West Main Street 

Louisville, Kentucky 40202 

Telephone: (502) 588-7255 

Facsimile: (502) 588-7298 

Counsel for Defendant

HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARK L. MCHUGH, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO., a private 

company, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO. C 07-03677 EDL 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF 

CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Plaintiff MARK L. MCHUGH, and Defendant HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO. (“H&B”), 

through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the Case Management Conference 

in this matter, currently set for October 23, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom E, be continued until 

December 4, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., or to a date as soon thereafter that is practical for both the Court 

and the parties, or to such other date as determined by the Court. 

Case 3:07-cv-03677-JSW Document 9 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 3
{00260087v1} _________-2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. C 07-03677 EDL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The grounds for this request are that all parties agree that it would be beneficial to engage in 

settlement discussions prior to the Case Management Conference in an effort to resolve the dispute 

without further court action. Additionally, defendant H&B has not yet filed a response to MARK L. 

MCHUGH’s complaint. Pursuant to the Court’s Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference 

and ADR Deadlines, the parties’ meet and confer deadline and Joint ADR Certification Defendant 

deadline is currently set to occur before H&B’s deadline for filing its responsive pleading. 

THEREFORE, it is agreed by the undersigned parties, and their respective counsel, that the 

case management conference now set for October 23, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., shall be continued until 

December 4, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., or to a date as soon thereafter that is practical for both the Court 

and the parties, or to such other date as determined by the Court. 

SO STIPULATED. 

 CARR & FERRELL LLP 

Dated: October 2, 2007 By: /s/ Christopher P. Grewe 

 CHRISTOPHER P. GREWE 

 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 MARK L. MCHUGH 

 

 HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO. 

Dated: October 2, 2007 By: /s/ Steven H. Lyverse 

 STEVEN H. LYVERSE 

 

 Counsel for Defendant 

HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO. 

IT IS SO ORDERED, this _____ day of October 2007. 

 

 Elizabeth D. Laporte, United States Magistrate Judge

The Case Management Conference is continued to December 4, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. A 

joint Case Management Conference statement shall be filed no later than November 

27, 2007. 3

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:07-cv-03677-JSW Document 9 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 3
{00260087v1} _________-3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No. C 07-03677 EDL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

General Order 45 Attestation of Signatures

 I, Christopher P. Grewe, attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from the other signatory, which shall serve in lieu of his signature. 

 /s/ Christopher P. Grewe 

Christopher P. Grewe

Case 3:07-cv-03677-JSW Document 9 Filed 10/03/07 Page 3 of 3