Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00828/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00828-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Raul Hernandez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On September 18, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for a conference and settlement. In response 

to this Court’s order, Defendants filed a response on September 26, 2014. Defendants submit that a 

settlement conference would not be helpful at this time as they intend to bring a motion for summary 

judgment. Furthermore, Defendants contend the terms of the proposed settlement relating to dental 

implants are not feasible. Defendants will never agree to provide Plaintiff a dental implant because 

such treatment is specifically excluded under California Code of Regulations, title 15, section 

3350.1(c)(5). 

///

///

///

RAUL HERNANDEZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

R.D. SMITH, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:09-cv-00828-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CASE 

CONFERENCE AND SETTLEMENT 

[ECF Nos. 45, 47]

Case 1:09-cv-00828-AWI-SAB Document 48 Filed 09/30/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Based on Defendants’ representation that a settlement conference would not be beneficial at 

the present time, Plaintiff’s motion for a settlement conferred is DENIED, without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 29, 2014 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00828-AWI-SAB Document 48 Filed 09/30/14 Page 2 of 2