Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00372/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00372-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 330
Nature of Suit: Federal Employers' Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Tort Claim

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 1

STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA’S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

KIMBERLY A. GAAB (SBN 166452)

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Courthouse

2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401

Fresno, California 93721

Telephone: (559) 497-4000

Facsimile: (559) 497-4099

Attorneys for Defendant United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL and THELMA RENSBERGER, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

THE UNITED STATES OF )

AMERICA’S FOREST SERVICE, )

ROSS F. CAROLL, INC., and )

K. W. EMERSON, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

 )

1:06-cv-00372-OWW-LJO

STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S TIME

TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON 

 

Plaintiffs Paul and Thelma Rensberger (“Plaintiffs”) and

Defendant United States of America (“United States”), by and

through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to an additional 25

days, through and including August 18, 2006, for the United

States to respond to the First Amended Complaint, filed June 6,

2006 (Doc. 21), and respectfully request that the Court so

approve.

Good cause exists for this stipulation based on the

following: The United States’ response to the First Amended

Complaint is currently due July 24, 2006. The two other

Case 1:06-cv-00372-LJO -SMS Document 32 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

 Nothing in this stipulation is intended to constitute a 1

waiver of any defense that may be asserted by the United States. 

The United States specifically reserves all of its defenses and

objections in this action, including without limitation its

defenses and objections under Rules 4, 8 and 12 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure and under all other applicable laws and

procedural rules.

2

STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA’S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

defendants have pending motions to dismiss/motion for a more

definite statement pertaining to the First Amended Complaint

(Docs. 26-28). By minute order dated July 13, 2006, the Court

advised counsel to select one agreeable date to hear all motions

(Doc. 29). Counsel selected September 18, 2006 for the hearing

date. Therefore, Plaintiff and the United States stipulate to

extend the United States’ time to respond to the First Amended

Complaint to August 18, 2006. Should the United States file a

motion to dismiss, it will therefore be set for hearing with the

other pending motions on September 18, 2006.1

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: July 13, 2006. DESMOND, NOLAN, LIVAICH & 

 CUNNINGHAM

By: 

WILLIAM C. LIVAICH

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Paul and Thelma Rensberger

Dated: July 13, 2006. McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: 

KIMBERLY A. GAAB

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

United States of America

Case 1:06-cv-00372-LJO -SMS Document 32 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 3

STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA’S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant United States of America’s

time to respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended to

August 18, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 15, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00372-LJO -SMS Document 32 Filed 07/17/06 Page 3 of 3