Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-01470/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-01470-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

05cv1470

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEIL MINTZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DIETZ & WASTON, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 05-CV-1470-L(CAB)

ORDER DENYING AS

PREMATURE AND WITHOUT

PREJUDICE EX PARTE

APPLICATIONS TO EXPEDITE

AND FOR PERMISSION 

[doc. #59, 61]

Because the Markman hearing in this matter has been continued, plaintiffs’ ex parte

application to expedite request for permission to bring audio-visual equipment for Markman

hearing [doc. #59] and defendant’s ex parte request for permission to bring in audio-visual

equipment for claim construction hearing [doc. #61] are premature and will be denied at this

time. The parties must file future requests to bring in equipment for hearings at least five court

days prior to the date of the hearing.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED denying as premature and without prejudice

plaintiffs’ ex parte application to expedite request for permission to bring audio-visual

equipment for Markman hearing [doc. #59]. 

. . .

. . .

. . .

Case 3:05-cv-01470-L-JMA Document 65 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 05cv1470

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as premature and without prejudice defendant’s

ex parte request for permission to bring in audio-visual equipment for claim construction hearing

[doc. #61]. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November 20, 2006

M. James Lorenz

United States District Court Judge

COPY TO: 

HON. CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ALL PARTIES/COUNSEL

Case 3:05-cv-01470-L-JMA Document 65 Filed 11/20/06 Page 2 of 2