Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-02133/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-02133-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Robert B. Morrill (SBN 35488) 

Edward V. Anderson (SBN 083148) 

Matthew T. Powers (SBN 124493) 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 397-4621 

Email: rmorrill@sidley.com 

Email: evanderson@sidley.com 

Email: mpowers@sidley.com 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SUMCO and SUMCO USA Corporation 

Igor Shoiket (SBN 190066) 

Paul F. Kirsch (SBN 127446) 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND 

CREW LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 576-0200 

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 

Email: ishoiket@townsend.com 

Email: pkirsch@townsend.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. 

R. Terrance Rader (Pro Hac Vice) 

David T. Nikaido (Pro Hac Vice) 

Glenn E. Forbis (Pro Hac Vice) 

Linda D. Mettes (Pro Hac Vice) 

RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC 

39533 Woodward Avenue, Suite 140 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 

Telephone: (248) 594-0600 

Facsimile: (248) 594-0610 

Email: rtr@raderfishman.com 

Email: dtn@raderfishman.com 

Email: gef@raderfishman.com 

Email : ldm@raderfishman.com 

Robert M. Evans, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) 

David W. Harlan (Pro Hac Vice) 

Marc W. Vander Tuig (Pro Hac Vice) 

SENNIGER POWERS 

One Metropolitan Square, 16th Floor 

St. Louis, MO 63102 

Telephone: (314) 231-5400 

Facsimile: (314) 231-4342 

Email: revans@senniger.com 

Email: mvandertuig@senniger.com 

Email: dharlan@senniger.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

SUMITOMO MITSUBISHI SILICON 

CORPORATION, aka SUMCO, a corporation 

of Japan and SUMCO USA CORPORATION, 

a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS) 

Related w/Case No. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 12
1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Plaintiffs Sumitomo Mitsubishi Silicon Corporation, aka SUMCO, SUMCO USA 

Corporation and Defendant MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. (collectively, “the Parties”) stipulate to 

the following Protective Order to apply to documents and information produced or disclosed in this 

case: 

PROCEDURE AND DEFINITIONS

1. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 

The Parties or third-party discovery respondents may designate as “Confidential,” by 

stamping or other appropriate means, any document or information produced in accordance with the 

federal discovery rules or by agreement, including, without limitation, interrogatory answers, initial 

and supplemental disclosures, responses to document requests and requests for admission, deposition 

transcripts and exhibits, pleadings, motions, briefs, affidavits, declarations and any other discovery 

and disclosure made in this litigation containing sensitive proprietary information (collectively, 

“Confidential Information”). Confidential Information is also specifically intended to include 

information informally produced, shown or made available for review by the parties or their counsel, 

including but not limited to any demonstration of either party’s products, facilities, processes, or 

business records so long as the material is designated as being Confidential Information pursuant to 

this Order. 

2. ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 

Confidential Information so designated, and information derived therefrom, shall not be 

disclosed, made available to or used by anyone except the persons specified below, and by these 

persons solely for purposes of this litigation and not for any business or other purpose. For the 

purpose of this paragraph, the term “this litigation” includes dealings between a producing party and 

an insurer or other third-party having an actual or potential obligation to indemnify or defend the 

producing party. 

a. Upon compliance with paragraph 6 of this Protective Order, officers, 

directors, and employees of the Parties, to whom the disclosure of Confidential Information is 

necessary for purposes of this litigation; 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 12
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

b. Trial Attorneys for the Parties (i.e., attorneys of record with the Court in this 

litigation) and their employees involved in the conduct of this litigation to whom disclosure of 

“Confidential” information is necessary for purposes of this litigation; 

c. In-house counsel and associated legal personnel, such as paralegals, legal 

assistants, and administrative assistants for the Parties; 

d. The Court and its personnel in any proceedings in this lawsuit; 

e. Upon compliance with paragraph 6 of this Protective Order, experts and 

consultants retained by any of the Parties to whom disclosure of Confidential Information is 

necessary for purposes of this litigation; 

f. Third-party court reporting services, third-party duplicating, document 

handling and/or imaging services; 

g. Any person who was involved in the preparation of the document or who 

lawfully received or reviewed it; and 

h. Upon compliance with paragraph 6 of this Protective Order, any other person 

to whom disclosure of “Confidential” information is necessary for purposes of this litigation, with 

the express written consent of the Parties or by an order of the Court permitting such disclosure, such 

order being obtained on noticed motion (or on shortened time as the Court may allow). 

3. CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY INFORMATION 

The Parties or any third-party discovery respondent also may designate as “Confidential — 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” by stamping or other appropriate means, any Confidential Information 

containing highly sensitive proprietary, development or inventive work, financial, marketing or trade 

secret information, or any other material that the producing Party reasonably believes would cause 

severe competitive damage if it were to be disclosed to another party. 

4. ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY 

INFORMATION 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 3 of 12
3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Information designated as “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall not be disclosed, 

made available to, or used by anyone except the persons specified below, and by these persons solely 

for the purposes of this litigation and not for any business or other purpose: 

a. Trial Attorneys for the Parties (i.e., attorneys of record with the Court in this 

litigation) and their employees involved in the conduct of this litigation to whom the disclosure of 

“Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information is necessary for purposes of this litigation; 

b. In-house counsel and associated legal personnel, such as paralegals, legal 

assistants, and administrative assistants for the Parties; 

c. Upon compliance with paragraph 6 of this Protective Order, experts and 

consultants retained by any of the Parties to whom the disclosure of “Confidential — Attorneys’ 

Eyes Only” information is necessary for purposes of this litigation; 

d. The Court and its personnel in any further proceedings in this lawsuit; 

e. Any person who was involved in the preparation of the document or who lawfully 

received or reviewed it; 

f. Third-party court reporting services, third-party duplicating, document handling 

and/or imaging services; and 

g. Upon compliance with paragraph 6 of this Protective Order, any other person to 

whom disclosure of “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information is necessary for purposes 

of this litigation, with the express written consent of the Parties or by an Order of the court 

permitting such disclosure, such order being obtained on noticed motion (or on shortened time as the 

Court may allow). 

5. TIME FOR MAKING CONFIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS 

Designation of any Confidential Information as “Confidential” or “Confidential — 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” must be made before a copy of the Confidential Information is produced by 

one party to another party. 

Inadvertent failure to designate discovery material(s) as “Confidential” or “Confidential — 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” at the time of production may be remedied by supplemental written notice. If 

such notice is given, the identified materials shall thereafter be fully subject to this Order as if they 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 4 of 12
4 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

initially had been designated as “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” provided 

that there shall be no sanction for any use of disclosure of such material prior to designation. The 

inadvertent disclosure shall not be deemed a waiver, in whole or in part, of the claim of 

confidentiality, either as to the specific discovery material(s) disclosed or as to any other discovery 

material(s) relating thereto or in the same or related subject matter.

In the case of deposition transcript pages, the designating party either may state on the record 

that the testimony is “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” or may advise 

opposing counsel of the specific pages to be maintained in confidence within twenty (20) calendar 

days after receipt of the transcript of the deposition. Until the expiration of the 20-day period, the 

entire transcript and its exhibits will be treated as “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” Unless 

designated in accordance with this paragraph, any confidentiality is waived unless otherwise 

remedied, stipulated, or ordered. 

When designation of material as “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” is 

done at a deposition, the following procedures shall be followed: the reporter shall, on a separate 

page at the beginning of the transcript, identify the portion(s) of the transcript by page and by line 

that the designating Party asserts is “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” 

material. The reporter shall also designate within the transcript the beginning and the end of any 

testimony that should be treated as “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” 

material. The court reporter shall label and segregate in a separate envelope any exhibits any party 

asserts is “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material. This envelope shall be 

attached to the deposition transcript. After the court reporter has served the transcript on the parties, 

the discovery material shall be treated as “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” 

material.

CONSENT TO BE BOUND

6. NOTICE OF ORDER 

Each person described in paragraph 2(a), (e) and (h), and in paragraph 4(b) and (f), above, to 

whom “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material is disclosed, shall be 

advised of the existence of this Order and shall be bound by the restrictions contained herein. Before 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 5 of 12
5 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

disclosing any “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material to any such 

person, discovering counsel shall advise said person of this Order and said person must agree in 

writing or, if during deposition or trial, orally on the record to all the provisions of the nondisclosure agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

Each party shall maintain a file containing such certification and upon request, serve those 

certifications on the requesting party within fourteen (14) days of such request, except outside 

experts or consultants. As to outside experts or consultants, such certifications shall be served upon 

disclosure of outside experts or consultants. 

CHALLENGE TO DESIGNATIONS

7. NOTIFICATION AND CHALLENGE 

If any of the Parties challenges the confidentiality designations of any “Confidential” or 

“Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information, the party challenging the confidentiality 

designation may seek appropriate relief from the Court upon notice of at least ten (10) calendar days 

to all interested parties. The party claiming confidentiality will have the burden of proving that the 

challenged confidentiality designation is appropriate in the circumstances. All interested parties will 

make best efforts to resolve such disagreements as to confidentiality before submitting them to the 

Court. 

8. EFFECT ON RESTRICTIONS 

If a motion challenging a confidentiality designation is filed, the provisions of this Protective 

Order will apply to the “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information until 

the motion is decided. 

OTHER PROVISIONS

9. FILING UNDER SEAL 

Any party seeking to file any documents with the Court that contain “Confidential” or 

“Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information shall seek an Order, pursuant to Local Rule 79-

5, that such document be filed under seal and shall bear a legend referring to this Protective Order 

and indicating that the information may not be accessed by anyone other than necessary Court 

personnel without order of the Court or written stipulation of the parties. 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 6 of 12
6 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

To the extent “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material is filed with 

the Court prior to trial, such “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material shall 

be delivered to the court enclosed in a sealed envelope bearing the caption of this action, and 

indication of the nature of the contents, and the following legend: 

–Confidential

This envelope contains documents or information designated 

“Confidential” [or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only”] pursuant to an 

order issued by this court in the above-captioned action, on (date of order). This 

envelope shall not be opened or unsealed other than by a judge of this court or at 

his or her express direction, and its contents shall not be displayed or revealed 

except as the court may order.– 

Any court hearing or proceeding in which “Confidential” and/or “Confidential — Attorneys’ 

Eyes Only” information is submitted shall, in the Court’s discretion, be held in camera. 

10. THIRD-PARTY DEPOSITION TESTIMONY/PRODUCTION OF 

DOCUMENTS 

Any third-party providing deposition testimony or producing documents or things for use in 

this action may designate such information, documents or things as “Confidential” or 

“Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information and avail itself of all provisions of this 

Protective Order to the same extent as a party to this action. 

11. RETURN OF DOCUMENTS 

Upon completion of the litigation, and if requested by the producing party, the original and 

all copies of documents containing “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” 

information must either be returned to counsel for the producing party or be destroyed. The nonproducing Parties must provide to counsel for the producing party a certificate reflecting such 

disposition. The Parties and their counsel will not be required to return any document that contains 

their privileged communications or attorney work product, but, if such documents are not returned or 

destroyed, must continue to comply with the requirements of this Order. 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 7 of 12
7 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

12. SCOPE OF PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Nothing in this Protective Order restricts any of the Parties from using or disclosing its own 

“Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information for any purpose. 

Such disclosure, if done under conditions of confidentiality, shall not waive the protection of 

this Order and shall not entitle other parties or their attorneys to disclose such information or 

documents in violation of it. This Protective Order also does not apply to information that was 

lawfully in the possession of a Party, a third-party or in the public domain before the date of entry of 

this Protective Order or that is put in the public domain through no fault of a Party after the entry of 

this Protective Order. 

13. ADMISSIBILITY AT TRIAL; NON-WAIVER OF OBJECTIONS OR 

PRIVILEGES 

Nothing in this Order affects the admissibility of any documents, testimony, or other 

evidence at trial or restricts the use of information at trial. Any party who intends to use 

“Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material that were designated as such by 

another party at trial shall give the designating party reasonable notice of the intention to use such 

“Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material so that the designating party has 

a reasonable opportunity to request that such “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes 

Only” material be filed under seal in accordance with paragraph 9 and any other applicable court 

rules and procedures. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, this Order shall not be constructed as a waiver of 

any objections or privilege. By making any “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes 

Only” material available during the course of this litigation, the Parties do not waive any trade 

secrets or other confidential protection that might otherwise be afforded over those materials. 

Furthermore, by designating any discovery material(s) “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ 

Eyes Only,” the Parties do not acknowledge that any such discovery material is relevant or 

discoverable in this action. Nothing in this Order affects, in any way, the admissibility of any 

documents, testimony, or other evidence at trial. 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 8 of 12
8 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

All parties participated in the drafting of this Order and it shall not be interpreted 

against any party.

14. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 

The Parties and any other person subject to the terms of this Protective Order agree that this 

Court has and retains jurisdiction during and after this action is terminated for the purpose of 

enforcing this Protective Order. 

15. APPLICATION TO COURT 

This Protective Order is without prejudice to the right of any interested party to apply to the 

Court for an order permitting the disclosure of any “Confidential” or “Confidential — Attorneys’ 

Eyes Only” information or to apply for an order modifying or limiting this Protective Order in any 

respect. 

Dated: June 30, 2006 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

 By: s/ Edward V. Anderson 

Robert B. Morrill (SBN 035488) 

Edward V. Anderson (SBN 083148) 

 Matthew T. Powers (SBN 124493) 

 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

 555 California Street 

 San Francisco, California 94104 

 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

 Fax: (415) 397-4621 

 

R. Terrance Rader (Pro Hac Vice)

 David T. Nikaido (Pro Hac Vice)

 Glenn E. Forbis (Pro Hac Vice)

Linda D. Mettes (Pro Hac Vice)

 RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC 

 39533 Woodward Ave., Suite 140 

 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 

 Tel.: (248) 594-0600 

 Fax: (248) 594-0610 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SUMCO and SUMCO USA Corporation 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 9 of 12
9 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: June 30, 2006 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

 

 By: s/with consent of Marc W. Vander Tuig 

Igor Shoiket (SBN 190066) 

Paul F. Kirsch (SBN 127446) 

Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 576-0200 

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 

Email: ishoiket@townsend.com 

Email: pkirsch@townsend.com

Robert M. Evans, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) 

Marc W. Vander Tuig (Pro Hac Vice) 

David W. Harlan (Pro Hac Vice) 

SENNIGER POWERS 

One Metropolitan Square, 16th Floor 

St. Louis, MO 63102 

Tel.: (314) 231-5400 

Fax: (314) 231-4342 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated this ____ day of ___________________, 2006. 

 

Hon. Joseph C. Spero 

United States Magistrate Judge

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

18th July

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 10 of 12
10 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

EXHIBIT A — UNDERTAKING 

I, , state that: 

1. My address is . 

2. My present employer is . 

3. My present occupation or job description is 

 . 

4. In the past four years I have been employed by or acted as a consultant for the following 

companies in the following general fields of technology: 

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 

5. I have received a copy of the Protective Order in the matter of Sumitomo Mitsubishi 

Silicon Corporation, aka SUMCO and SUMCO USA Corporation v. MEMC Electronic Materials, 

Inc., United States District Court for the Northern District of California at Oakland, Civil Case No. C 

05-02133 SBA, signed by United States District Court Judge on ____________________, 2006. 

6. I have carefully read and understand the provisions of the Protective Order. I will 

comply with all of its provisions, including holding in confidence and not disclosing to anyone not 

qualified under the Protective Order, any information designated “Confidential” or “Confidential — 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or any words, substances, summaries, abstracts, or indices of designated 

information, and copies thereof, which come into my possession, and documents or things which I 

have prepared relating thereto, except to counsel for the party by whom I am retained. 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 11 of 12
11 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

7. I hereby consent to be subject to personal jurisdiction of the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of California at Oakland in respect to any proceeding relating to the 

enforcement of the Protective Order, including any proceedings relating to contempt of Court. 

Dated: Signature: 

Print Name 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 05-02133 SBA (JCS), RELATED CASE NO. C 01-04925 SBA (JCS) 

Case 4:05-cv-02133-SBA Document 204 Filed 07/18/06 Page 12 of 12