Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01370/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01370-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Order Re Request to Continue for Two Weeks the Opposition Due Date re Motion for Summary Judgment [10-cv01370 LJO MJS] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ and CHARISSE 

FERNANDEZ,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation; 

RON CLOWARD, Lieutenant; JOHN 

BUEHLER, Sergeant; JAMES MURPHY, 

RONNY ZIYA, MARK FONTES and 

KALANI SOUZA, Police Officers, in their 

individual and official capacities; and Does 1 

through 10,

Defendants.

Case No: 10-cv-01370 LJO MJS

ORDER RE REQUEST TO CONTINUE 

FOR THE OPPOSITION DUE DATE RE

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.

Having considered Defendants’ request for an extension of time to file an opposition to 

Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, Doc. 71, and Plaintiffs’ opposition thereto, Doc. 72, the 

Court finds there is good cause for a brief extension, not the two-week extension requested by 

Defendants. Accordingly, the Court hereby continues the deadline for the filing of Defendants’ 

opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment to February 26, 2015. In the interest of 

fairness, Plaintiffs’ reply deadline is continued to March 10, 2015. In addition, the hearing on the 

motion for summary judgment is VACATED and the matter will be taken under submission on the 

papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) upon the expiration of the reply deadline. The Court will 

endeavor to issue a ruling as soon as possible after any reply is filed and does not anticipate any 

prejudicial delay. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 19, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01370-LJO-MJS Document 73 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 1