Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04528/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04528-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BELENCIA WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-04528-KAW 

ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 31

On July 26, 2016, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. They did not, however, 

indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order as 

required by the Court’s Standing Order. (See Judge Westmore’s General Standing Order ¶ 11.)

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration 

stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders, (b) a declaration explaining 

each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed 

protective order with the model order, or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model 

orders is not practicable. The declaration shall also explain why the parties have submitted a 

separate stipulation and proposed order regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 07/28/16

______________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:15-cv-04528-KAW Document 33 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 1