Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-61/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS 

REGARDING UBER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

DECERTIFICATION [DKT. 479] 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099 

tboutrous@gibsondunn.com 

DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289 

dwongyang@gibsondunn.com 

MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308 

mmcrae@gibsondunn.com 

THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 

tevangelis@gibsondunn.com 

DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, 

SBN 254433 

dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com 

BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325 

bstoker@gibsondunn.com 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 

Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 

jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com 

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289 

kringdowell@gibsondunn.com 

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 

Telephone: 415.393.8200 

Facsimile: 415.393.8306 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS 

COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and 

ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-3826-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE 

OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS 

REGARDING UBER’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OR, IN THE 

ALTERNATIVE, DECERTIFICATION 

[DKT. 479] 

Date: March 24, 2016 

Time: 1:30 pm 

Place: Courtroom 5 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice 

ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 

Boston, MA 02116 

Telephone: (617) 994-5800 

Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 

sliss@llrlaw.com 

apagano@llrlaw.com 

MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242 

CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES 

100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (510) 239-4710 

mcarlson@carlsonlegalservices.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, 

MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE 

GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 483 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS 

REGARDING UBER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

DECERTIFICATION [DKT. 479] 

 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Douglas 

O’Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Uber 

Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree as follows: 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Adjudication as to 

Plaintiffs’ Gratuities Law Claim Or, in the Alternative, Motion to Decertify Plaintiffs’ Gratuities Law 

Class, is currently due on February 25, 2016; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel is taking the California bar exam on February 23 through 25, 

2016 and will be unavailable that week; 

 WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed to a brief extension of six days for 

Plaintiffs to file their Opposition on March 2, 2016 and a corresponding extension for Defendant to 

file their Reply brief; 

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to is currently set for March 24, 2016 and 

this revised schedule will allow briefing to be complete well in advance of the hearing date; 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that: 

(1) Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Adjudication as to 

Plaintiffs’ Gratuities Law Claim Or, in the Alternative, Motion to Decertify 

Plaintiffs’ Gratuities Law Class, will be due on March 2, 2016; 

(2) Defendant’s Reply in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Adjudication 

as to Plaintiffs’ Gratuities Law Claim Or, in the Alternative, Motion to Decertify 

Plaintiffs’ Gratuities Law Class, will be due on March 14, 2016. 

10

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 483 Filed 02/12/16 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS 

REGARDING UBER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

DECERTIFICATION [DKT. 479] 

Dated: February 12, 2016 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN 

ADELAIDE PAGANO 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

MATTHEW CARLSON 

CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES 

By: /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, 

MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE GURFINKEL, 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated, 

Dated: February 12, 2016 THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. 

DEBRA WONG YANG 

MARCELLUS A. MCRAE 

THEANE D. EVANGELIS 

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ 

DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA 

BRANDON J. STOKER 

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By: /s/ Kevin J. Ring-Dowell 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: ____________________ 

 Hon. Edward M. Chen 

(as modified above) 2/12/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 483 Filed 02/12/16 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS 

REGARDING UBER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

DECERTIFICATION [DKT. 479] 

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 483 Filed 02/12/16 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 483 Filed 02/12/16 Page 5 of 5