Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05899/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05899-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on January 30, 2006, as 1

undeliverable. However, plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice,

service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTIN BONILLA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

LOVE, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05899-REC-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 8)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff, Martin Bonilla (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 11, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within fifteen (15)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:04-cv-05899-REC -SMS Document 10 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed January 11,

2006, are ADOPTED in full;

2. This action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is

DISMISSED; and,

3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

668554Dated: February 10, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05899-REC -SMS Document 10 Filed 02/10/06 Page 2 of 2