Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00737/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00737-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs NICOLE MOSS

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICOLE MOSS, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES: HELPING

YOU HELP OTHERS, a California public

benefit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PEARL RESTAURANT; CHEVAR, L.P.;

and LAI KIE WAI, an individual dba

PEARL RESTAURANT,

Defendants. ___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-0737 PVT

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this

action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Mutual Settlement Agreement and Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own costs and

attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over

enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994)

(empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through

their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

 XXXXXXXXXX

Case 5:05-cv-00737-PVT Document 24 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 2

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: August 4, 2006 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Jennifer L. Steneberg

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs NICOLE MOSS and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS

Dated: July 13, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF LESLEY HARRIS

By: /s/ Lesley B. Harris

Lesley B. Harris

Attorneys for Defendants PEARL RESTAURANT

and LAI KIE WAI

Dated: July 31, 2006 MORALES & GARY

By: /s/ Todd B. Gary

Todd B. Gary

Attorneys for Defendant CHEVAR, L.P.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Mutual Settlement Agreement and Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: _____________, 2006

Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8/4

Case 5:05-cv-00737-PVT Document 24 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 2