Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01243/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01243-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 1-06-CV01243-OWW/SMS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RONALD E. MALLEN (SBN: 40928) 

KARA E. FARMER (SBN: 233373) 

rmallen@hinshawlaw.com

kfarmer@hinshawlaw.com

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 

One California Street 

18th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415-362-6000 

Facsimile: 415-834-9070 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ANTHONY CARY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION 

MANUEL LOPES and MARIANA 

LOPES, dba LOPES DAIRY; RAYMOND 

LOPES; JOSEPH LOPES and MICHAEL 

LOPES, indvidually and dba WESTSIDE 

HOLSTEIN; ALVARO MACHADO and 

TONY ESTEVAN 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

GEORGE VIEIRA; MARY VIEIRA; 

CALIFORNIA MILK MARKET, a 

California Corporation; VALLEY GOLD, 

LLC, a California Limited Liability 

Company; GENSKE-MULDER LLP, a 

California Limited Liability Partnership; 

ANTHONY CARY; DOWNEY BRAND 

LLP, a California Limited Liability 

Partnership; CENTRAL VALLEY 

DAIRYMEN, INC., a California Food and 

Agricultural Nonprofit Cooperative 

Association; and DOES 1 through 25, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: CV-F-06-1243 OWW/SMS 

CORRECTED 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

APPROVING ADDITIONAL 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND 

TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIVIL 

L.R. 6-144(a) 

Complaint Filed: June 25, 2007 

Honorable OLIVER W. WANGER 

 

 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-01243-JLT Document 61 Filed 09/21/07 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 1-06-CV01243-OWW/SMS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I. STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Plaintiffs and Defendant, Anthony Cary, through their counsel, hereby agree and 

stipulate that: 

a. Defendant Cary received three prior extensions of time to respond to 

Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. The first extension allowed Defendant Cary until 

Friday, August 10, 2007 to respond. The second extension allowed Defendant Cary until 

August 24, 2007 to respond. The third extension allowed Defendant Cary until 

September 14, 2007 to respond. 

b. Defendants Genske-Mulder LLP and Downey Brand LLP’s Motions to 

Dismiss were set for hearing on August 13, 2007. The Court continued the hearing on 

the Motions to Dismiss to August 29, 2007. Recently, due to the press of business, the 

Court continued the hearing on the Motions to Dismiss to September 17, 2007. 

c. Plaintiffs and Defendant Cary agree that, because Plaintiffs continue to 

examine whether to proceed on the claims against Defendant Cary, and given the recent 

continuance of the hearing on the Motions to Dismiss, Defendant Cary will, with the 

Court’s approval, have an additional extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs’ First 

Amended Complaint until October 5, 2007. 

d. No other parties, besides Plaintiffs and Defendant Cary are affected by this 

stipulation and order. 

SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: September 10, 2007 SEILER EPSTEIN ZIEGLER & APPLEGATE, 

 LLP 

 By: /S/ Douglas A. Applegate 

 Douglas A. Applegate 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-01243-JLT Document 61 Filed 09/21/07 Page 2 of 3
3

STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 1-06-CV01243-OWW/SMS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: September 11, 2007 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 

 By: ___/S/ Kara E. Farmer________ 

 Ronald E. Mallen 

 Kara E. Farmer 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 ANTHONY CARY 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon the above stipulation of the affected 

parties, Defendant Cary shall have an additional extension of time to respond to 

Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, to October 5, 2007. 

DATED: Sept. 16, 2007 

 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER 

 ________________________________ 

HONORABLE OLIVER W. WAGNER 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2962367/850182 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-01243-JLT Document 61 Filed 09/21/07 Page 3 of 3