Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00969/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00969-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re: TEXTAINER PARTNERSHIP

SECURITIES LITIGATION

___________________________________

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

ALL ACTIONS

 /

No. C-05-0969 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING MOVANT STEVEN

L. CRAIG TO LODGE CHAMBERS

COPIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On June 17, 2005, lead plaintiff applicant Steven L. Craig (“Craig”) electronically filed

an opposition to the motion for appointment of lead plaintiff filed by lead plaintiff applicants

Alan P. Gordon and Warren Heller. Craig has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on

the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy

of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly

marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See

General Order 45 § VII.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Craig is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of the above-referenced

documents. The parties are hereby advised that if any party fails in the future to comply

with the Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Case 3:05-cv-00969-MMC Document 98 Filed 06/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court may impose sanctions on the noncomplying party, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 22, 2005 

/s/ Maxine M. Chesney 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00969-MMC Document 98 Filed 06/22/05 Page 2 of 2