Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05914/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05914-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARDEROSIAN, 

RUNYON, CERCONE,, 

LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721

Ovidio Oviedo, Jr., No. 210311

MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE,

 LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, California 93721

Telephone: (559) 441-7991

Facsimile: (559) 441-8170

Attorneys for: Defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, CHIEF OF POLICE ERIC MATLOCK,

ALAN TANDY, and OFFICERS HEREDIA AND NELSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEROME GODDARD,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

COUNTY OF KERN; D.O. ROBERT

REED; D.O. CHRISTOPHER DALTON;

D.O. FERNANDEZ; D.O. JOSHUA

GAUSE; D.O. TREVINO; SGT. GERALD

COFFEE; NURSE ZABALA; SHERIFF

MACK WIMBISH; CITY OF

BAKERSFIELD; B.P.D. HEREDIA,

OFFICER NELSON; CHIEF OF POLICE

ERIC MATLOCK; ALAN TANDY; AND

DOES 1-100,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case Number 1:04-cv-5914 REC TAG

AMENDED STIPULATED DISMISSAL

AND ORDER

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 1:04-cv-05914-TAG Document 37 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

God dar d v. C ounty of Ke rn, et a l.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. CIV-F-04-5914 REC TAG

2

MARDEROSIAN, 

RUNYON, CERCONE,, 

LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, through

their respective counsel, that defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, MARTIN HEREDIA,

CHARLES NELSON, ERIC MATLOCK, and ALAN TANDY, only, be dismissed with without

prejudice in accordance with a waiver of costs and malicious prosecution claim in this matter. Each

side bears their own costs and fees. This is not a dismissal of any other defendants.

Dated: April 27, 2005 MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE,

 LEHMAN & ARMO

/s/ OVIDIO OVIEDO, JR.

By:

 OVIDIO OVIEDO, JR.,

 Attorney for Defendants above named

Dated: April 26, 2005 FAULKNER LAW OFFICES

/s/ Jim Faulkner

By:

 JIM FAULKNER,

 Attorney for Plaintiffs above named

ORDER

The stipulation of the parties having been read and considered by the Court, and good cause

appearing therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, MARTIN HEREDIA,

CHARLES NELSON, ERIC MATLOCK, and ALAN TANDY, be dismissed with without prejudice.

This is not a dismissal of any other defendants.

Dated: _____April 27, 2005 ______/s/ ROBERT E. COYLE__________________

JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:04-cv-05914-TAG Document 37 Filed 04/28/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

God dar d v. C ounty of Ke rn, et a l.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. CIV-F-04-5914 REC TAG

3

MARDEROSIAN, 

RUNYON, CERCONE,, 

LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, declare as follows:

I am over the age of eighteen (18) and not a party to this action; my business address is 1260

Fulton Mall Fresno, California, 93721, which is located in the county where the mailing described

below took place.

On April 27, 2005, at Fresno, California, I served a true copy of the AMENDED

STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER in a sealed envelope addressed as

follows to the parties to the within action described as:

ATTORNEY

Kathleen Ellis Faulkner, Esq.

FAULKNER LAW OFFICES

1825 - 18th Street

Bakersfield, CA 93301

PARTY

Plaintiff

Mark L. Nations, Esq.

County of Kern County Counsel Office

1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor

Bakersfield, CA 93301

Defendant COUNTY OF KERN

 X Placed for

Mailing:

I am readily familiar with the practice for collection and processing of

correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service of the firm.

The practice is to deposit correspondence with the United States Postal Service

the same day it is placed for mailing in the ordinary course of business. I placed

the envelope(s), with postage prepaid, [ marked Express Mail] for collection

and processing for mailing following said practice. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1013, et seq.)

 Personally

Mailed:

I deposited the envelope(s), with postage prepaid, [ marked Express Mail] with

the United States Postal Service. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1013, et seq.)

 Personal

Service:

I delivered said envelope(s) by hand to the address(es) listed above. (Code Civ.

Proc., § 1011.)

 Facsimile: I served said document via facsimile transmission to the number(s) listed above.

(Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1013, et seq.)

 State: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that

the foregoing is true & correct.

 X Federal: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at

whose direction service was made.

 Executed on April 27, 2005, at Fresno, California.

 ______________________________________

 VICKIE MORA

\776.030

Case 1:04-cv-05914-TAG Document 37 Filed 04/28/05 Page 3 of 3