Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-01392/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-01392-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

05cv1392-B (BLM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff,

v.

BROADCOM CORPORATION,

Defendant. 

BROADCOM CORPORATION,

Counterclaimant,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Counterdefendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05cv1392-B (BLM)

ORDER (1) CONFIRMING

SETTLEMENT, (2) SETTING

DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT MOTION

FOR DISMISSAL, AND (3) DENYING

OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS

AS MOOT [DOC. NOS. 742, 835]

On March 14, 2007, the parties informed the Court that a settlement

has been reached. See Doc. No. 867 (“Minute Entry for proceedings held

before Judge Rudi M. Brewster: Motion In Limine Hearing (Group 1) set

for 3/14/2007 not held. Counsel informs Court a settlement has been

reached. Jury Trial (Group 1) set for 3/19/2007 - VACATED.”).

Accordingly, a joint motion for dismissal of this case, signed by

counsel of record and all parties, must be filed no later than April 5,

2007. A proposed order on the joint motion for dismissal must be eCase 3:05-cv-01392-B-BLM Document 873 Filed 03/16/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The proposed order shall be e-mailed pursuant to section 2(h) of the United

States District Court for the Southern District of California's Electronic Case Filing

Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, available at www.casd.uscourts.gov

(follow link for "General Order 550, Procedural Rules for Electronic Case Filing").

2 05cv1392-B (BLM)

mailed to the district judge's chambers1 on the same day. If the signed

joint motion for dismissal is timely filed, the parties and attorneys

are not required to make any further appearances before Judge Major.

If the fully executed joint motion for dismissal is not filed by

April 5, 2007, then all counsel of record and unrepresented parties are

required to appear in person for a Settlement Disposition Conference.

The Settlement Disposition Conference will be held on April 10, 2007 at

9:00 a.m. in Courtroom A.

If counsel of record or any unrepresented party fails to appear at

the Settlement Disposition Conference, or the parties fail to file the

signed joint motion for dismissal in a timely manner, the Court will

issue an Order to Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed for

failing to comply with this Order.

All other pending dates before Magistrate Judge Major are hereby

vacated. All outstanding discovery motions, including Broadcom’s Motion

for Sanctions Against Qualcomm to Exclude Certain Witnesses that were

Untimely and Improperly Disclosed [Doc. No. 742] and Qualcomm’s Motion

to Compel Production of Certain Documents from Broadcom’s Privilege Log

[Doc. No. 835] are DENIED as moot. Any matters currently scheduled

before the district judge shall remain in effect pending notice from

that court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2007

BARBARA L. MAJOR

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01392-B-BLM Document 873 Filed 03/16/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 05cv1392-B (BLM)

COPY TO:

HONORABLE RUDI M. BREWSTER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ALL COUNSEL

Case 3:05-cv-01392-B-BLM Document 873 Filed 03/16/07 Page 3 of 3