Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_10-cv-08125/USCOURTS-azd-3_10-cv-08125-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael L. Taylor, on behalf of himself

and other persons similarly situated, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Autozone, Inc. et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-10-8125-PCT-FJM

ORDER

We have before us plaintiffs’ motion (doc. 62) to modify the Rule 16 scheduling order

(doc. 22). Defendant has not responded. Plaintiffs request that we extend the discovery

cutoff date from August 31, 2011 to October 21, 2011, 150 days after the date of our order

conditionally certifying the class (doc. 67). 

We may modify a Rule 16 schedule only upon a showing of “good cause.” Fed. R.

Civ. P. 16(b)(4). The “‘good cause’ standard primarily considers the diligence of the party

seeking the amendment.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th

Cir. 1992). We may modify the order only “if it cannot reasonably be met despite the

diligence of the party seeking the extension.” Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co.,

302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002). 

Plaintiffs filed their motion for conditional class certification on November 30, 2010,

and the motion was fully briefed on December 27, 2010. Because of an especially busy

period for the court, we did not issue our order conditionally certifying the class until May

Case 3:10-cv-08125-FJM Document 85 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

24, 2011 (doc. 67). The time needed to produce potential class members’ contact

information and send notice to potential class members, as well as the opt-in period, leaves

the parties with little opportunity for plaintiff-specific discovery. We therefore conclude that

there is good cause to extend the discovery cutoff deadline to October 21, 2011. 

Neither this extension, nor its consequences, will be grounds for further modification

of the Rule 16 schedule, including the dispositive motion deadline of September 30, 2011.

The parties are advised to complete relevant discovery sooner rather than later. 

IT IS ORDERED GRANTING plaintiffs’ motion to modify the scheduling order

(doc. 62). Paragraph 6 of the Rule 16 Scheduling Order (doc. 22) is amended to provide that

all discovery must be completed by October 21, 2011. 

DATED this 10th day of June, 2011.

Case 3:10-cv-08125-FJM Document 85 Filed 06/10/11 Page 2 of 2