Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-00405/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-00405-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MICHAEL BOYD,

Plaintiff,

v.

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00405-BLF 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO EFFECT SERVICE OF 

PROCESS; GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE OF 

THE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE; GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR AN 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

AND CLARIFYING THAT PLAINTIFF 

MAY NOT ADD ADDITIONAL 

PARTIES OR CLAIMS WITHOUT 

EXPRESS LEAVE OF COURT

[Re: ECF 82]

On October 22, 2015, Plaintiff filed a document requesting: (1) a 120-day extension of 

time to effect service of process; (2) a continuance of the Case Management Conference from 

November 12, 2015 to January 21, 2016; and (3) a two-week extension of the deadline for filing a 

second amended complaint.

Plaintiff’s requests are GRANTED as follows:

(1) Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension of time to effect service of process until 

February 25, 2016;

(2) The Case Management Conference set for November 12, 2015 is CONTINUED to 

January 21, 2015 at 11:00 a.m.; and

Case 5:15-cv-00405-BLF Document 84 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

(3) The deadline for filing a second amended complaint is EXTENDED to November 

18, 2015. With respect to Plaintiff’s statement that he wishes to dismiss Jason 

Matthys from this case, Plaintiff may do so by omitting Jason Matthys from the 

amended pleading. With respect to Plaintiff’s statement that he anticipates adding 

additional plaintiffs and defendants in this case, the Court hereby CLARIFIES that 

Plaintiff was granted leave to amend only as to those claims and parties alleged in 

the first amended complaint. Plaintiff may MAY NOT ADD additional claims or 

parties without express leave of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 26, 2015

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-00405-BLF Document 84 Filed 10/26/15 Page 2 of 2