Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05421/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05421-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING 

SCHEDULE RE MOT. FOR CLASS CERT. 

No. C-03-05421-RMW

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\FB1\2682394_1.DOC 

BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No.128838 

LEO P. CUNNINGHAM, State Bar No. 121605 

DANIEL W. TURBOW, State Bar No. 175015 

JONI L. OSTLER, State Bar No. 230009 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Email: dturbow@wsgr.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

LEAPFROG ENTERPRISES, INC., 

TIMOTHY M. BENDER, JAMES P. 

CURLEY, MARK B. FLOWERS, THOMAS J. 

KALINSKE, ROBERT W. LALLY, JAMES L. 

MARGGRAFF, PAUL A. RIOUX and 

MICHAEL C. WOOD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re LEAPFROG ENTERPRISES, INC., 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

All Actions. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-03-05421 (RMW) 

And Related Cases 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE 

REGARDING MOTION FOR CLASS 

CERTIFICATION 

Date: N/A 

Time: N/A 

Judge: The Honorable Ronald M. 

Whyte 

*E-FILED - 7/7/05*

Case 5:03-cv-05421-RMW Document 134 Filed 07/07/05 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING 

SCHEDULE RE MOT. FOR CLASS CERT. 

No. C-03-05421-RMW

-1- C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\FB1\2682394_1.DOC 

WHEREAS on March 31, 2005, the Court issued an order in this action consolidating 

numerous related cases, appointing Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel, and setting a schedule for 

various procedural events including the filing of a consolidated complaint and the filing and 

briefing of a motion for class certification (“Order”); 

WHEREAS on June 17, 2005, Lead Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Class Action 

Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (“Consolidated Complaint”); 

WHEREAS pursuant to the Order, Lead Plaintiffs are required to file a motion for class 

certification within 30 days of the filing of their Consolidated Complaint, or July 18, 2005; 

WHEREAS presently before the Court are several motions concerning two additional 

class action complaints filed in this District against LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc., The Parnassus 

Fund, et al. v. Curley, et al., No. 05-0165 JSW, and Gentry, et al. v. Curley, et al., No. 05-02279 

MJJ, and whether those additional class actions should be related and consolidated with the 

instant consolidated class action; 

WHEREAS defendants anticipate filing a motion to dismiss the operative complaint in 

this action (whether that be the present Consolidated Complaint or another amended consolidated 

complaint ordered to be filed by the Court); 

WHEREAS until the Court rules on the motions concerning the Parnassus and Gentry

actions, and until the Court has ruled on any motion to dismiss filed by defendants, counsel for 

Lead Plaintiffs and defendants in this action have agreed in principle that it would not be 

efficient to brief and adjudicate a motion for class certification; 

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by the parties to this action, by 

and through their undersigned counsel and subject to the approval of the Court, as follows: 

1. Lead Plaintiffs need not file their motion for class certification on July 18, 2005. 

2. The deadline to file a motion for class certification should be extended until after 

the Court has ruled on any motion to dismiss by defendants. 

3. After the Court has ruled on any motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint or 

such other operative amended consolidated complaint as the Court may order to be filed, the 

parties shall meet and confer to discuss an appropriate schedule to file and brief a motion for 

Case 5:03-cv-05421-RMW Document 134 Filed 07/07/05 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING 

SCHEDULE RE MOT. FOR CLASS CERT. 

No. C-03-05421-RMW

-2- C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\FB1\2682394_1.DOC 

class certification, and the parties shall attempt to stipulate to such a schedule as promptly as 

possible. 

Dated: June 30, 2005 LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

 By: /s/ Christopher P. Seefer 

 Christopher P. Seefer 

 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Dated: June 30, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

 By: /s/ Daniel W. Turbow 

 Daniel W. Turbow 

 Counsel for Defendants 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

 United States District Judge 

7/7/05 /S/ RONALD M. WHYTE

Case 5:03-cv-05421-RMW Document 134 Filed 07/07/05 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING 

SCHEDULE RE MOT. FOR CLASS CERT. 

No. C-03-05421-RMW

-3- C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\FB1\2682394_1.DOC 

I, Daniel W. Turbow, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Modifying Schedule Regarding Motion for Class 

Certification. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Christopher P. 

Seefer has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: June 30, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

 By: /s/ Daniel W. Turbow 

 Daniel W. Turbow 

Counsel for Defendants Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc., 

James P. Curley, and Thomas J. Kalinske 

Case 5:03-cv-05421-RMW Document 134 Filed 07/07/05 Page 4 of 4