Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01623/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01623-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERINO HERNANDEZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

ARNOLD SCHWARENEGGER, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-01623-OWW-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 13)

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 12)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AS

DUPLICATIVE

ORDER TERMINATING ACTION

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On September 18, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

a Recommendation that Respondent's motion to dismiss based on the

ground that the instant petition is a second or successive petition

be DENIED; however, the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus

be dismissed as duplicative, and the Clerk of Court be directed to

terminate this action. These Findings and Recommendation were

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were

to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of

that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections

to the Findings and Recommendation.

Case 1:06-cv-01623-OWW -SMS Document 14 Filed 11/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation are supported by

the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed September 18,

2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss based on the ground that

the instant petition is a second or successive petition, filed July

19, 2007, is DENIED; however,

3. The instant petition for writ of habeas corpus is

DISMISSED as duplicative of Case No. 1:06-01337-OWW-SMS-HC; and,

4. The Court of Clerk TERMINATE this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 28, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01623-OWW -SMS Document 14 Filed 11/29/07 Page 2 of 2