Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-05817/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-05817-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAFAEL MATEOS-SANDOVAL

and SIMEON AVENDANDO RUIZ,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C11-5817 TEH

ORDER GRANTING COUNTY

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION TO

RECONSIDER PORTIONS OF

DECEMBER 6, 2012 ORDER

AND CLARIFYING THAT

DISMISSAL WAS WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Defendants the County of Sonoma, the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office, and SheriffCoroner Steve Freitas in his official capacity (collectively, “County Defendants”) have

submitted a motion for the Court’s consideration relating to its “Order Granting in Part and

Denying in Part Motions to Dismiss,” entered on December 6, 2012 (Docket No. 50). In

their motion, filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3), County Defendants request leave

to file a motion to reconsider with respect to those portions of the December 6, 2012 Order

addressing the interpretation and application of California Vehicle Code § 12801.5(e), and

the interpretation and determination of the legislative intent underlying California Vehicle

Code § 14602.6(a). 

Additionally, the Parties indicated in a joint stipulation filed on December 21, 2012

(Docket No. 54) that they are uncertain whether the Court’s dismissal of several of Plaintiffs’

claims in its December 6, 2012 Order was with leave to amend.

Upon careful consideration of these filings, and with good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Leave to amend is GRANTED with respect to all claims dismissed in the December

6, 2012 order; and

Case 3:11-cv-05817-TEH Document 58 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. County Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Reconsider is

GRANTED with respect to the following matters addressed in the Dismissal Order: (a) the

interpretation and application of Vehicle Code § 12801.5(e); and (2) the interpretation and

determination of legislative intent with respect to Vehicle Code § 14602.6(a). County

Defendants shall have 21 days from the date of this Order to file any such motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 01/02/2013 _______________________________________

HONORABLE THELTON E. HENDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE .

Case 3:11-cv-05817-TEH Document 58 Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 2