Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00846/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00846-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ESTATE OF ANTON BARRETT, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-0846 JAM CKD

ORDER

 Defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s expert Roger Clark and plaintiffs’ motion to 

compel production of documents and further responses to interrogatories is pending before the 

court. The matters were submitted on the papers. Upon review of the documents in support and 

opposition, and good cause appearing, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 

 1. The court finds that the belated disclosure of plaintiffs' expert is neither substantially 

justified nor harmless. Defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s expert (ECF No. 23) is therefore 

granted. 

 2. Plaintiffs' motion to compel (ECF No. 26) is granted in part. No later than February 

23, 2015, defendants shall produce the documents identified in the proposed protective order at 

2:5-3:4 (ECF No. 30-2 at p. 10-11). Said documents shall be produced subject to the provisions 

of the proposed protective order (ECF No. 30-2 at p. 9-13). Defendants are directed to submit the 

/////

Case 2:13-cv-00846-JAM-CKD Document 34 Filed 02/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

proposed protective order in Word format for signature by the undersigned. The remainder of the 

motion to compel is denied. 

Dated: February 18, 2015 

4 barrett.mtsexp.mtc 

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:13-cv-00846-JAM-CKD Document 34 Filed 02/18/15 Page 2 of 2