Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_04-cv-00657/USCOURTS-azd-4_04-cv-00657-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lawrence K. Connor, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of

Social Security, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 04-657-TUC-CKJ

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment pertaining to

the denial of disability benefits. Also pending before the Court is Defendant's Cross-Motion

for Summary Judgment regarding the same denial of disability benefits. 

United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Marshall issued a Report and

Recommendation on March 31, 2006. In that Report and Recommendation, Magistrate

Judge Marshall recommended denying Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment,

granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, and remanding the case to the ALJ for

reconsideration consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation indicated that any party could file written objections

within ten days after being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. Copies

of the Report and Recommendation were sent out to all parties on March 31, 2006. The

Case 4:04-cv-00657-CKJ-JR Document 23 Filed 05/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. As such, the Court will

not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the entire record and concludes that Magistrate Judge

Marshall’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R.

Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v.

Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) United States Magistrate Judge Marshall's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #22) is

ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED.

(2) Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #14) is DENIED.

(3) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #12) is GRANTED, and this case is

REMANDED TO THE ALJ for reconsideration consistent with the Report and

Recommendation. 

(4) The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file

in this matter.

DATED this 4th day of May, 2006.

Case 4:04-cv-00657-CKJ-JR Document 23 Filed 05/05/06 Page 2 of 2