Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-195/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SHARP’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(b) 

Case Nos. 07-cv-5944, MDL No. 1917; Case No. 13-cv-1173

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Kenneth A. Gallo (pro hac vice) 

Joseph J. Simons (pro hac vice) 

Craig A. Benson (pro hac vice) 

PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP 

2001 K Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20006-1047 

Telephone: (202) 223-7356 

Facsimile: (202) 223-7420 

Email: kgallo@paulweiss.com 

Email: jsimons@paulweiss.com 

Email: cbenson@paulweiss.com 

Stephen E. Taylor (SBN 058452) 

Jonathan A. Patchen (SBN 237346) 

TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP 

One Ferry Building, Suite 355 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 788-8200 

Facsimile: (415) 788-8208 

Email: staylor@tcolaw.com 

Email: jpatchen@tcolaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. v. Hitachi Ltd., et al., 

Case No. C 13-1173 (SC) 

 Case No. 07-cv-05944 (SC) 

MDL No. 1917 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

SHARP’S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS 

UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 

79-5(b) 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2259 Filed 12/11/13 Page 1 of 2
 -2- 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SHARP’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(b) 

Case Nos. 07-cv-5944, MDL No. 1917; Case No. 13-cv-1173

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

Upon consideration of Sharp’s Administrative Motion to File a Document Under Seal 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(b), submitted in connection with Sharp’s Opposition to 

Toshiba Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Sharp’s Complaint, it is hereby: 

ORDERED that the Administrative Motion is hereby GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that the Clerk shall file and maintain under seal: 

Document to Be Filed Under Seal

Exhibit A attached to the Declaration of Vince Sampietro in 

Support of Sharp’s Opposition to Toshiba Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss Sharp’s Complaint 

Exhibit A to the Declaration of Craig A. Benson in Support of 

Sharp’s Opposition to Toshiba Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

Sharp’s Complaint 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

DATED: , 2013 _________________________________

HON. SAMUEL CONTI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

December 11

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2259 Filed 12/11/13 Page 2 of 2