Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00022/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00022-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARMANDO S. CASTELLON, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

JEFF WRIGLEY, et al., )

)

)

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:07-cv- 00022-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 7)

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS (Docs. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On January 5, 2007, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1).

On March 1, 2007, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. (Doc. 4). On

March 21, 2007, Respondent filed an amended motion to dismiss, amending only Exhibit 1. 

(Doc. 6). On April 18, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending the motion to dismiss be granted and that the petition for writ

of habeas corpus be dismissed as moot. (Doc. 7). This Findings and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty days

from the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the

Case 1:07-cv-00022-OWW -TAG Document 8 Filed 07/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed April 18, 2007 (Doc. 7), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s amended Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED as MOOT; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00022-OWW -TAG Document 8 Filed 07/26/07 Page 2 of 2