Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01284/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01284-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:405 Fair Housing Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAJUANA MILTON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

REGENCY PARK APARTMENTS, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-1284 KJM CKD

ORDER

Plaintiff’s motion to compel further responses to interrogatories and production of 

documents came on regularly for hearing on May 28, 2014. Stuart Fagan appeared for plaintiffs. 

Mark Robertson appeared telephonically for defendants. Upon review of the documents in 

support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing 

therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The motion to compel (ECF No. 21) is granted in part. All further responses 

compelled by this order shall be limited to responding for each individual defendant and shall not 

include the definition of “you” and “yours” used by plaintiff in propounding the interrogatories 

and document requests. All discovery compelled by this order shall be produced subject to the 

stipulated protective order (ECF No. 25). Further responses and production of

/////

/////

Case 2:13-cv-01284-KJM-CKD Document 29 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

documents1shall be made, as set forth below, no later than June 11, 2014. 

2. Further responses to the interrogatories are compelled as follows:

No. 1: granted, limited to 2012 to the present;

No. 2: granted, net worth statement only;

No. 3: granted, limited to claims of housing discrimination against individual

defendants since 2009;

Nos. 4-6: inspection/copying of files maintained at the Regency Park Apartments

is allowed;

No. 7: denied;

Nos. 8, 14-17: inspection/copying of files maintained at the Regency Park 

Apartments is allowed;

Nos. 9, 10, 12, 13: granted, limited solely to the Regency Park Apartments since 

2009; 

No. 11: denied;

No. 18 (served on defendant Regency Park and Joseph Camacho): denied;

Nos. 18, 23, 24: denied.

3. Further production of documents is compelled as follows:

Nos. 1, 2, 5, 49: denied;

Nos. 3, 4, 6: denied;

Nos. 7-14, 16, 18-28, 31-35, 44-48, 51-58, 61, 67-72: inspection/copying of files 

maintained at the Regency Park Apartments is allowed;

Nos. 29, 30: granted, limited to claims of housing discrimination against 

individual defendants since 2009;

Nos. 36-40: denied, without prejudice to issuance by plaintiff of a subpoena duces 

tecum at trial should the trial court allow in evidence of defendants’ net worth for the 

 

1

 Some of the responsive documents are maintained at the business office of the defendant 

apartment complex. Plaintiff’s counsel indicated at the hearing that a copy service will be sent to 

copy all the documents maintained at the office.

Case 2:13-cv-01284-KJM-CKD Document 29 Filed 05/29/14 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

punitive damages claim;

Nos. 41-43: denied;

No. 71: denied;

Nos. 59, 60: granted, limited to correspondence between defendants and 

California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing from 2009 to present.

4. The court declines to make an award of expenses incurred in connection with the 

motion.

Dated: May 29, 2014

4 milton2.oah

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:13-cv-01284-KJM-CKD Document 29 Filed 05/29/14 Page 3 of 3