Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03834/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03834-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAIMIN JIMMY JEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-03834-HSG 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE OPPOSITION

Re: Dkt. No. 24

Plaintiff Kaimin Jimmy Jen has filed a motion to extend time to file an “answer” to the 

motion to strike, Dkt. No. 6, and motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 7, filed by Defendant City and 

County of San Francisco (“San Francisco”). Dkt. No. 24. San Francisco has opposed the motion

on the grounds that Mr. Jen already filed an opposition to its motions. Dkt. No. 25.

San Francisco is correct that Mr. Jen has already filed a consolidated opposition to 

Defendants’ motion to strike and motion to dismiss, which is located at Docket No. 17. Because 

the Court does not require further briefing on these motions, Mr. Jen’s motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 20, 2015

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cv-03834-HSG Document 27 Filed 01/20/16 Page 1 of 1