Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00904/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00904-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODGER PHILLIP ROBBINS, JR., )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

TUOLUMNE COUNTY, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-CV-00904 LJO NEW (DLB) HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #7]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On October 13, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED and the Clerk of Court be

DIRECTED to enter judgment. This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within ten

(10) court days of the date of service of the order. 

On October 23, 2006, Petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file objections.

Petitioner’s motion was granted and the deadline for filing objections was moved to December 26,

Case 1:06-cv-00904-LJO -LJO Document 15 Filed 03/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

2006. Petitioner filed a second motion for extension of time on December 20, 2006. This motion was

granted as well and the deadline was moved to February 26, 2007. The deadline has now passed and

Petitioner has not filed objections. 

On February 22, 2007, due to the recent elevation of the undersigned to U.S. District Judge, 

this case was reassigned to the undersigned for all further proceedings.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued October 13, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 14, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00904-LJO -LJO Document 15 Filed 03/15/07 Page 2 of 2