Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01367/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01367-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Michael O. Marich,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 02-1367 FCD PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

D.K. Butler, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoDecember 9, 2002, the court found that service of process

was appropriate only for defendant Butler but did not address

whether service was proper for defendant Cambra, Acuna, Flatt or

Latteri.

The pleading fails to state a claim against any defendant

other than Butler because it does not show how any other

defendant participated in the deprivation of plaintiff’s

constitutional rights. The court finds that, at the present

juncture, amendment would be futile. 

Case 2:02-cv-01367-FCD-PAN Document 39 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, the court hereby recommends claims against

Cambra, Acuna, Flatt and Latteri be dismissed for failure to

state a cognizable claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: June 2, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:02-cv-01367-FCD-PAN Document 39 Filed 06/03/05 Page 2 of 2