Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01974/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01974-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 385
Nature of Suit: Property Damage - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

F:\docs\spc\spc.015\Plead\[proposed]order motion to enlarge time.wpd [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME

Brian S. Letofsky - Bar No. 159232

Richard J. Stinstrom - Bar No. 140675

PIERCE & WEISS, LLP

451 W. Lincoln Avenue

Anaheim, California 92805

Tel: (714) 778-5038

Fax: (714) 778-1467

Email: bletofsky@pierceweiss.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SUNBEAM CORPORATION; BIDDEFORD

TEXTILE CORPORATION (DOE 1);

BIDDEFORD BLANKETS, LLC (DOE 2), and

DOES 3-25,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C05-01974 BZ

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENLARGE

TIME FOR SERVICE

This matter came on for hearing on _________/______/2006, on Plaintiff's duly noticed

(Proposed) Notice of Motion and Motion to Enlarge Time for Service of Second Amended

Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 6(b) & Local Civil Rule 6-3. Having read the papers submitted in

support of and in opposition to the motion and having considered the arguments of counsel, the

Court finds that justice requires that plaintiff’s Motion be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Motion to Enlarge Time for Service of the Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff has until _________/____/2006 to served the Second Amended Complaint upon

defendants.

3. The Status Conference is continued to ________/______/2006.

Case 3:05-cv-01974-BZ. Document 49 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 1 of 3

is unopposed.

July 3

August 7 , at 4:00 p.m.

Case 4:05-cv-01974-PJH Document 51 Filed 04/27/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

F:\docs\spc\spc.015\Plead\[proposed]order motion to enlarge time.wpd [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME

4. The deadline to file a joint status report is continued from June 5, 2006 to 

___________/______/2006.

Dated: _________________. 

_________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-01974-BZ. Document 49 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 2 of 3

July 28

April 27, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 4:05-cv-01974-PJH Document 51 Filed 04/27/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

F:\docs\spc\spc.015\Plead\[proposed]order motion to enlarge time.wpd [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME

Case 3:05-cv-01974-BZ. Document 49 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 3 of 3 Case 4:05-cv-01974-PJH Document 51 Filed 04/27/06 Page 3 of 3