Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-04-01079/USCOURTS-ca8-04-01079-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1079

___________

Jesse Robert Furr/Stanley, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas * Appeal from the United States

Regional Unit, ADC; Tommy James, * District Court for the

Assistant Warden, Maximum Security * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Unit, ADC; Anderson, Dr., Maximum *

Security Unit, ADC; James I. Cagle, *

Dr., Arkansas Department of * [UNPUBLISHED]

Correction; Sarah Speer, Infirmary *

Manager or Staff Personnel, Alexander *

Youth Center; Correctional Medical *

Services; Pinkston, RNP, Maximum *

Security Unit, ADC; C. Green, RN, *

Unit Infirmary Manager, Maximum *

Security Unit, ADC, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: September 23, 2004

Filed: April 11, 2006

___________

Before BYE, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 04-1079 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/11/2006 Entry ID: 2031202
1

The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the findings and recommendations of the

Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District

of Arkansas.

-2-

Jesse Robert Furr/Stanley (Furr), an inmate at the Tucker Maximum Security

Unit in Arkansas, appeals the district court’s1

 preservice dismissal without prejudice

of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and moves to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on

appeal and for appointment of counsel. We grant Furr leave to proceed IFP, assessing

the filing fee and leaving the collection details to the district court, see Henderson v.

Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 484-85 (8th Cir. 1997) (per curiam), and we deny appointment

of counsel.

Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper

because we agree with the district court that Furr failed to fully exhaust his

administrative remedies as to all his claims. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (dismissal

required where inmate fails to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit);

Johnson v. Jones, 340 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir. 2003) (dismissal required when inmate

has not administratively exhausted before filing lawsuit); Graves v. Norris, 218 F.3d

884, 885-86 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (dismissal proper where at least some claims

unexhausted). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________

Appellate Case: 04-1079 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/11/2006 Entry ID: 2031202