Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07114/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07114-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.06\Noble114coa.wpd 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILBERT NOBLE,

Petitioner,

 vs.

DARREL G. ADAMS, Warden, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-7114 RMW (PR)

ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

(Docket No. 21) 

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court ordered respondent to show cause why the

petition should not be granted. Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition as untimely was

granted. Petitioner has filed a request for a certificate of appealability, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b). Petitioner has not

shown "that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid

claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it

debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v.

McDaniel, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 1604 (2000). Accordingly, the request for a certificate of

appealability is DENIED.

The Clerk shall forward this order, along with the case file, to the United States

*E-FILED - 10/15/08*

Case 5:06-cv-07114-RMW Document 24 Filed 10/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.06\Noble114coa.wpd 2

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, from which petitioner may also seek a certificate

of appealability. See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997).

This order terminates docket number 21.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

10/10/08

Case 5:06-cv-07114-RMW Document 24 Filed 10/15/08 Page 2 of 2