Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01168/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01168-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION

Julie N. Nong (SBN 208013)

NT Law

2600 W. Olive Ave., 5th Fl., #647

Burbank, CA 91505

Tel: (888) 588-0428

Fax: (888) 588-0427

Email: julienong@ntlawgroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Anna Kihagi, Xelan Prop 1, LLC, 

Renka Prop, LLC, and Zoriall LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANNA KIHAGI, an individual, 

XELAN PROP 1, LLC, a California 

limited liability company, RENKA 

PROP, LLC, a California limited 

liability company, and ZORIALL 

LLC, a California limited liability 

company,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 

CALIFORNIA, a California public 

facilities corporation; VICTORIA L. 

WEATHERFORD, a natural person; 

MICHAEL WEISS, a natural person, 

TONY PELEA, a natural person; 

MARICIO HERNANDDEA, a natural 

person and DOES 1-30, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE No. 15-cv-01168 KAW

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DUE 

DATE FOR OPPOSITION TO 

MOTION FOR ABSTENTION 

UNTIL AUGUST 17, 20015 AND 

TO EXTEND DATE FOR CITY’S 

REPLY UNTIL AUGUST 24, 2015

Hearing Date: 9/17/2015

Time: 11:00 am

Place: 1301 Clay, 3rd Floor, Oakland

Complaint Filed: March 12, 2015

Trial Date: None set

Case 4:15-cv-01168-KAW Document 28 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION

THE PARTIES BY AND THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD 

HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

Plaintiffs and the defendants hereby agree and stipulate subject to Court’s

approval that the due date plaintiffs’ opposition to the defendants’ Motion for 

Abstention Pending Resolution of State Court Proceeding shall be extended from 

August 13, 2015 until August 17, 2015 and further that the due date for defendants’ 

reply to the opposition to the Motion shall be extended from August 20, 2015 until 

August 24, 2015. 

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: August 13, 2015 NT Law 

/s/Julie Nong

By:

JULIE N. NONG

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: August 13, 2015 DENNIS J. HERRERA

City Attorney

CHERYL ADAMS

Chief Trial Deputy

MARGARET W. BAUMGARTNER

Deputy City Attorney

/s/ Margaret Baumgartner

By:_______________________

MARGARET W. BAUMGARTNER

Attorneys for Defendant

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO

Case 4:15-cv-01168-KAW Document 28 Filed 08/14/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION

ORDER ON STIPULATION

Based on the foregoing Stipulation by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The due date for Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Defendants’ motion for 

abstention is extended from August 13, 2015 until August 17, 2015. The due date 

for the defendants’ reply to the opposition is extended from August 20, 2015 until 

August 24, 2015. The hearing date remains as previously scheduled. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 13, 2015

_____________________________

United States District Court Judge

--- 14 xxxxxxx Magistrate xxxxxx

Case 4:15-cv-01168-KAW Document 28 Filed 08/14/15 Page 3 of 3