Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01118/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01118-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JARRIS J. SILAGI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITAL, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-1118 AC P (TEMP) 

ORDER & 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By an order filed July 20, 2015, plaintiff was granted, for the second time, thirty days’ 

leave (i) to file an amended complaint, and (ii) to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the 

appropriate filing fees. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff was further cautioned that his failure to comply 

with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) The 

thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, has not filed 

an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee, and has not otherwise responded 

to the court’s order. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a 

district judge in this action. 

 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-01118-KJM-AC Document 9 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: November 10, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-01118-KJM-AC Document 9 Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 2