Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01226/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01226-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NELSON 

MULLINS RILEY 

& SCARBOROUGH LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

JOINT STIPULATION 

Shawtina F. Lewis (SBN 259255)

shawtina.lewis@nelsonmullins.com

NELSON MULLINS RILEY & 

SCARBOROUGH LLP

19191 South Vermont Avenue, Suite 900

Torrance, CA 90502

Telephone: 424.221.7400

Facsimile: 424.221.7499

Matthew B. Lerner (admitted pro hac vice)

matthew.lerner@nelsonmullins.com

James F. Rogers (admitted pro hac vice)

jim.rogers@nelsonmullins.com

NELSON MULLINS RILEY & 

SCARBOROUGH LLP

201 17th Street NW, Suite 1700

Atlanta, GA 30363

Telephone: 404.322.6158

Facsimile: 404.322.6050

Eric J. Buhr (SBN 217529)

ebuhr@reedsmith.com

Alexis A. Rochlin (SBN 280634)

arochlin@reedsmith.com

Kevin G. Lohman (SBN 222678)

klohman@reedsmith.com

REED SMITH LLP

355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514

Telephone: +1 213.457.8000

Facsimile: +1 213.458.8080

Attorneys for Defendants 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID TODD, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. BARD INC., and

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:19-cv-01226-DAD-BAM

JOINT STIPULATION ADOPTING 

THE PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND 

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDERS 

PREVIOUSLY ISSUED AND 

ADOPTED IN THE MDL AND ORDER

Case 1:19-cv-01226-DAD-BAM Document 44 Filed 02/10/20 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NELSON 

MULLINS RILEY 

& SCARBOROUGH LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1

JOINT STIPULATION

Case No.: 1:19-cv-01226-DAD-BAM

The Plaintiff David Todd and Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, 

Inc., (collectively, “Bard”) (Plaintiff and Bard are collectively referred to herein as “the Parties”) 

respectfully submit this Joint Stipulation adopting the following protective orders and case 

management orders previously issued and adopted in MDL 2641 (the “MDL”) and identified 

below as Exhibits 1 - 6: 

1. November 10, 2015, Stipulated Protective Order, attached as Exhibit 1;

2. December 1, 2015, Case Management Order No. 3, attached as Exhibit 2 

3. January 5, 2016, Case Management Order No. 7, attached as Exhibit 3;

4. March 31, 2016, Case Management Order No. 9, attached as Exhibit 4;

5. May 5, 2016, Case Management Order No. 12, attached as Exhibit 5, with respect 

to the collection of medical and insurance records; Plaintiffs also reserve all and do not waive 

any privileges by virtue of stipulating to entry of this order;

6. November 16, 2016, Amended Case Management Order No. 171, attached as 

Exhibit 6. 

Thus, the Parties stipulate and agree that the above referenced orders shall apply to this 

matter. The Parties further stipulate that the adoption of the above-referenced orders will not 

interfere with the Parties’ compliance with the Court’s rules and Local Rule 141 regarding filing 

documents under seal.

Respectfully submitted this 28th day of January 2020.

DATED: February 7, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP

/s/ Shawtina F. Lewis

Shawtina F. Lewis

Attorney for Defendants 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

 

1 During the December 20th hearing, the Court requested clarification concerning the references in 

Amended Case Management Order No. 17 to the MDL Stipulated Protective Order (Doc. 268), rather 

than Stipulated Protective Order (Doc. 269), attached as Exhibit 1. In response, the Parties note that (Doc. 

268) was “AMENDED by (Doc. 269)” by the MDL Court “to include Exhibit C,” which had been 

inadvertently excluded in (Doc. 268). This can be seen in the docket entries on the PACER docket for 

2:15-md-02641-DGC (D. Ariz.). The references in Amended Case Management Order 17 to (Doc. 268) 

should equally refer to (Doc. 269).

Case 1:19-cv-01226-DAD-BAM Document 44 Filed 02/10/20 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NELSON 

MULLINS RILEY 

& SCARBOROUGH LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

2

JOINT STIPULATION

Case No.: 1:19-cv-01226-DAD-BAM

DATED: February 7, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

MARTIN BAUGHMAN PLLC

/s/ Laura Jean Baughman (as authorized on 1/27/2020)

Laura Jean Baughman

Attorneys for Plaintiff

David Todd

Case 1:19-cv-01226-DAD-BAM Document 44 Filed 02/10/20 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NELSON 

MULLINS RILEY 

& SCARBOROUGH LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

3

JOINT STIPULATION

Case No.: 1:19-cv-01226-DAD-BAM

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 7, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system and I served a copy of the foregoing pleading on all 

counsel for all parties, via the CM/ECF system and/or mailing same by United States Mail, 

properly addressed, and first class postage prepaid, to all counsel of record in this matter.

By: /s/ Shawtina F. Lewis

Shawtina F. Lewis

Case 1:19-cv-01226-DAD-BAM Document 44 Filed 02/10/20 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NELSON 

MULLINS RILEY 

& SCARBOROUGH LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

4

JOINT STIPULATION

Case No.: 1:19-cv-01226-DAD-BAM

ORDER

The Court adopts the Stipulated Protective Order, Pretrial Order No. 3, and Case 

Management Order Nos. 7, 9, 12, and 17 attached as Exhibits 1 through 4 to the joint stipulation

submitted by the parties on January 28, 2020 (Doc. No. 42) with the following modifications:

1. References to “this action,” “this litigation,” “this proceeding,” “the parties,”

“plaintiff,” and “defendants” or any variation thereof shall refer to David Todd v. C.R. Bard., 

Inc., et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-01226-DAD-BAM pending before the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of California and the parties thereto, and not the multidistrict litigation 

known as In Re: Bard IVC Filers Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2641, before the 

United States District Court for the District of Arizona and the parties thereto; and

2. References to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5.6 shall be replaced with Local Rule 

141.

The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District 

Court, Eastern District of California, any documents, including documents produced subject to 

the Stipulated Protective Order, to be filed under seal must be accompanied by a written request 

which complies with Local Rule 141 prior to sealing. The party making a request to file 

documents under seal shall be required to show good cause for documents attached to a nondispositive motion or compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos 

v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any 

approved document filed under seal, the party shall file a redacted copy of the sealed document. 

The redactions shall be narrowly tailored to protect only the information that is confidential or 

was deemed confidential. Additionally, the parties shall consider resolving any disputes arising 

under the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order, Pretrial Order No. 3, or Case Management 

Order Nos. 7, 9, 12, and 17 according to the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedures.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 7, 2020 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-01226-DAD-BAM Document 44 Filed 02/10/20 Page 5 of 5