Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01843/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01843-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SREY TEANG, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TIMOTHY J. MAYOPOULOS, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-1843 MCE AC (PS) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 On January 29, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not 

be dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s prior order. ECF 

No. 4. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to prosecute this 

case. 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 

prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s orders. See Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. R. 110. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one (21) 

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

Case 2:15-cv-01843-MCE-AC Document 5 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: February 26, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-01843-MCE-AC Document 5 Filed 02/29/16 Page 2 of 2