Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05942/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05942-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMELIA D PEREZ and CONSTANTINO R.

PEREZ, JR.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A.,

BANK OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA

RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1

through 50, inclusive.

Defendants. /

No. C 09-05942 WHA

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed this action alleging various claims to challenge the

validity of their mortgage loan. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss scheduled to be heard on

February 18, 2010. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to the motion was due

on January 28, 2010, but no such opposition was received. Because plaintiffs are pro se, they

were given until February 25, 2010, to show cause for their failure to file an opposition or to file

a statement of nonopposition. Yet again, the deadline passed and plaintiffs did not file a

response.

As described, plaintiffs have repeatedly failed to respond in a timely fashion. Due to 

Case 3:09-cv-05942-WHA Document 10 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

their failure to prosecute, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. 

Judgment shall be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 2, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-05942-WHA Document 10 Filed 03/02/10 Page 2 of 2