Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01838/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01838-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOWARD HERSHIPS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GROVES AT MANZANITA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-1838 MCE CKD PS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed April 6, 2016, defendants’ motion for more definite statement was granted 

and plaintiffs were granted leave to file a second amended complaint no later than May 6, 2016. 

That time period has now expired, and plaintiffs have not filed a second amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

/////

/////

Case 2:15-cv-01838-MCE-CKD Document 60 Filed 05/10/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 10, 2016

4 herships1838.fta

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-01838-MCE-CKD Document 60 Filed 05/10/16 Page 2 of 2