Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00738/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00738-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

JAMES HONG KIM AND NANCY OK KIM TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. C05-0738 HRL

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JULIA M. ADAMS (State Bar No. 230795)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

NICOLE MOSS

and DISABILITY RIGHTS, 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION, 

SERVICES: HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NICOLE MOSS, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TAQUERIA CANCUN; GEE TEE O

L.L.C., a limited liability company, JAMES

HONG KIM, NANCY OK KIM,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-0738 HRL 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS JAMES HONG KIM AND

NANCY OK KIM TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs NICOLE MOSS; and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES:HELPING YOU HELP OTHERS through their undersigned counsel,

and defendants JAMES HONG KIM and NANCY OK KIM, through their undersigned counsel,

stipulate as follows:

1. Defendants JAMES HONG KIM and NANCY OK KIM, are granted an extension

of time to and including August 31, 2006, to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs’

complaint.

Case 5:05-cv-00738-HRL Document 41 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 3

*ORDER E-FILED ON 8/21/06*

Case 5:05-cv-00738-HRL Document 42 Filed 08/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

JAMES HONG KIM AND NANCY OK KIM TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. C05-0738 HRL 2

2. In the event defendants JAMES HONG KIM and NANCY OK KIM, file a

motion in lieu of an answer to plaintiffs’ complaint, the hearing on such motion shall be set on a

date no sooner than 45 days from the filing of said motion.

3. Defendants further stipulate that they will comply with any and all due dates

dictated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Court, and/or any

scheduling order issued by the court prior to the date on which defendant’s responsive pleading

is due hereunder.

This Stipulation may be executed in faxed counterparts, all of which together shall

constitute one original document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: August 15, 2006 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: _____/s/_______________________

Julia M. Adams

Attorneys for Plaintiffs NICOLE MOSS; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS

DATED: August 15, 2006 NEWMAN, MARCUS & CLARENBACH, LLP

By: _____/s/_______________________

Edward W. Newman

Attorney for Defendants JAMES HONG KIM and

NANCY OK KIM

O R D E R

IT IS SO ORDERED that defendants JAMES HONG KIM and NANCY OK KIM

have until August 31, 2006, to answer or respond to plaintiffs’ complaint.

DATED: August _____, 2006 ___________________________________

Hon. Howard R. Lloyd

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:05-cv-00738-HRL Document 41 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 2 of 3

21 All other dates set by this court's July 21, 2006 case management order remain unchanged.

Case 5:05-cv-00738-HRL Document 42 Filed 08/21/06 Page 2 of 2