Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00469/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00469-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAVETTE SANDERS, individually and ) 

)

as guardian ad litem for the estate of ) 

Michael Sanders, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

THE CITY OF FRESNO a municipality; )

)

THE COUNTY OF FRESNO, a )

municipality; TASER )

INTERNATIONAL, Inc. a corporation )

doing business in California; JERRY )

DYER, an individual; and DOES 1 )

through 10, inclusive, )

)

Defendants. )

)

____________________________________)

CIV F 05-0469 AWI SMS

ORDER VACATING 

HEARING OF MARCH 13,

2006, ON DEFENDANTS’S 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Defendant City of Fresno’s motion to dismiss and Defendant Taser International, Inc.’s

motion to dismiss are pending in this action and are set for hearing on Monday, March 13, 2006. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(c), Plaintiff was required to file either an opposition or a notice of

non-opposition no later than February 27, 2006. Plaintiff has filed an opposition to Taser’s

motion, but has not done so with respect to the City’s motion.

Due to Plaintiff’s failure to file a timely opposition or notice of non-opposition as to the

City’s motion, she is in violation of the Local Rules. See Local Rule 78-230(c). Plaintiff is

Case 1:05-cv-00469-AWI -SMS Document 52 Filed 03/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

further not entitled to be heard at oral argument in opposition to the City’s motion. Id. The

court has reviewed both Defendants’s motions and the applicable law, and has determined that

the motions are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 78-230(h). 

Therefore, IT IS HERBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of March 13,

2006, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of March 13, 2006, the court will

take the matters under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 7, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00469-AWI -SMS Document 52 Filed 03/07/06 Page 2 of 2