Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-02234/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-02234-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision

---

{7011/005/00250595.DOC} 1

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JONES HELSLEY PC

8365 N. Fresno Street, Suite 310

Post Office Box 28340

Fresno, California 93729

Telephone: (559) 233-4800

Facsimile: (559) 233-9330

Timothy Jones #119841

John P. Kinsey #215916

Attorneys for: All Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION; 

REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA 

CORN AND SOYBEANS GROWERS; 

PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN, INC.; 

FRESNO COUNTY FARM BUREAU; 

NISEI FARMERS LEAGUE; 

CALIFORNIA DAIRY CAMPAIGN; 

REX NEDEREND; GROWTH ENERGY 

and the RENEWABLE FUELS 

ASSOCIATION

Plaintiffs,

v.

JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his official 

capacity as Executive Officer of the 

California Air Resources Board, 

Defendant.

Case No. 1:09-cv-02234-LJO-DLB

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

FURTHER CONTINUE 

MANDATORY SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE 

Scheduling Conference 

July 28, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 9

WHEREAS on January 28, 2010, Plaintiffs Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, 

Redwood County Minnesota Corn and Soybean Growers, Penny Newman Grain, Inc., Growth 

Energy, Renewable Fuels Association, Rex Nederend, Nisei Farmers League, the Fresno 

County Farm Bureau, and the California Dairy Campaign (collectively “RMFU Plaintiffs”) 

filed their Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (the “Second 

Amended Complaint”) against Defendant James N. Goldstene, in his official capacity as 

Case 1:09-cv-02234-LJO-BAM Document 82 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 3
{7011/005/00250595.DOC} 2

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board (“Defendant”) in this action. (Docket 

No. 11.)

WHEREAS on February 2, 2010, the National Petrochemical & Refiners 

Association (“NPRA”), American Trucking Associations (“ATA”) and the Center for North 

American Energy Security (“CNAES”) (collectively “NPRA Plaintiffs”), filed a Complaint for 

Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Jury Demand which challenges the same regulation at 

issue in this action (“NPRA Action”). 

WHEREAS Defendant filed motions to dismiss the Second Amended 

Complaint in the instant action and the NPRA Plaintiffs’ complaint in the NPRA Action (the 

“Motions to Dismiss”), which have been briefed and are scheduled to be heard on June 16, 

2010, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4.

WHEREAS the Mandatory Scheduling Conferences for both actions are set for 

the same day at the Defendants’ request and are presently set for June 30, 2010, at 9:15 a.m. in 

Courtroom No. 9.

WHEREAS Defendant has requested, and both the RMFU Plaintiffs and the 

NPRA Plaintiffs have agreed to stipulate to continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference to 

July 28, 2010, to accommodate the Court’s hearing and ruling on the Motions to Dismiss.

WHEREAS all parties are available to conduct the Mandatory Scheduling 

Conference in these actions on July 28, 2010, and have agreed to hold it on this date.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs in both actions and 

Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, that: 

1. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this Action, previously scheduled for 

June 30, 2010, should be continued to July 28, 2010, at 9:15 a.m. or such time as may be set by 

the Court, in Courtroom 9 (6th Floor). 

Dated: June 7, 2010 STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

By: /s/ Mark Poole 

Mark Poole, 

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:09-cv-02234-LJO-BAM Document 82 Filed 06/08/10 Page 2 of 3
{7011/005/00250595.DOC} 3

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: June 7, 2010 JONES HELSLEY PC

By: /s/ Timothy Jones 

Timothy Jones, 

Attorneys for all Plaintiffs

Dated: June 7, 2010 NATURAL RESOURCES

DEFENSE COUNCIL

By: /s/ David Pettit 

David Pettit, 

Attorneys for Applicants Natural Resources 

Defense Council, Inc. and Conservation 

Law Foundation

Dated: June 7, 2010 SIERRA CLUB

By: /s/ Pat Gallagher 

Pat Gallagher, 

Attorneys for Applicant Sierra Club

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing 

therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this 

action, previously scheduled for June 30, 2010, shall be continued to July 28, 2010, at 9:00 

a.m. in Courtroom 9 (6th Floor).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 7, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

3b142a

Case 1:09-cv-02234-LJO-BAM Document 82 Filed 06/08/10 Page 3 of 3