Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06464/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06464-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Inmate Lopez is still incarcerated. However, inmate Alatorre was released on parole. In the event that 1

inmate Alatorre is re-incarcerated prior to trial, plaintiff may wish to include him in the supplemental motion for the

court’s consideration. However, as long as Alatorre remains out of prison, the court cannot facilitate his

transportation to trial. Subject to applicable rules and regulations, plaintiff may be able to contact Alatorre and

secure his voluntary attendance at trial. Alatorre paroled to Region IV, El Cajon.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ABRAHAM ROMERO,

Plaintiff,

v.

COFFEE, BAPTISTE,

AND SAMMS,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:03-cv-06464-SMS PC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR THE ATTENDANCE OF

INCARCERATED WITNESSES

(Doc. 73)

In an order filed on February 14, 2008, the Court stated:

On January 22, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion seeking the attendance of incarcerated

witnesses Angel Lopez, #P-84811, and Joel Alatorre, #P-01049. Although plaintiff

contends that Lopez and Alatorre have firsthand knowledge of the relevant events,

plaintiff’s motion fails to set forth the specific details required by the court’s Second

Scheduling Order. Plaintiff is directed to review lines 15 through 18 on page 3 of the

order. If plaintiff wishes to have the court consider granting his motion, he must

supplement the motion by providing further information as to what the inmates saw

or heard, as provided in the Second Scheduling Order. Plaintiff’s supplemental 1

motion is due or before March 20, 2008. Defendants’ opposition, if any, is due on

or before April 10, 2008.

(Doc. 82.)

///

///

Case 1:03-cv-06464-SMS Document 85 Filed 04/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff did not file a supplemental motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for the

attendance of incarcerated witnesses Alatorre and Lopez, filed January 22, 2008, is HEREBY

DENIED based on Plaintiff’s failure to meet his burden as the moving party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 3, 2008 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06464-SMS Document 85 Filed 04/04/08 Page 2 of 2