Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_18-cv-04047/USCOURTS-cand-5_18-cv-04047-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SHIKEB SADDOZAI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LOMU, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 18-04047 BLF (PR) 

ORDER VACATING HEARINGS ON 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION 

Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 

1983, against employees at the Maguire Correctional Facility in San Mateo County. The 

Court found the amended complaint, (Docket No. 15), stated cognizable claims for 

deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, and ordered the matter served on 

Defendants. (Docket No. 22.) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on 

December 31, 2019, and have set if for a hearing on February 6, 2020, (Docket No. 22), 

and then an amended notice of motion and motion for summary judgment with a hearing 

set for April 16, 2020, (Docket No. 48). 

The Court stated in its Order of Service that Defendants’ summary judgment motion 

“shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due,” and that “No hearing will 

Case 5:18-cv-04047-BLF Document 50 Filed 01/23/20 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.” (Docket No. 13 at 4.) 

Accordingly, the hearings set for February 6, 2020, and April 16, 2020, are hereby 

VACATED. 

Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ summary judgment motion is currently due no 

later than January 28, 2020, and Defendants’ reply is due no later than fourteen days after 

Plaintiff’s opposition is filed. The matter shall be deemed submitted as of the date the 

reply is due without oral argument. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ ________________________ 

BETH LABSON FREEMAN 

United States District Judge 

Order Vacating Hearing 

PRO-SE\BLF\CR.18\04047Saddozai_vacate.hearing 

Case 5:18-cv-04047-BLF Document 50 Filed 01/23/20 Page 2 of 2