Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00538/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00538-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

____________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE; Case No. 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-CMK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GROSS LAW, P.C.

THE EMBARCADERO

PIER 9, SUITE 100

SAN FRANCISCO, CA

94111

STUART G. GROSS (#251019)

sgross@grosskleinlaw.com

DANIEL C. GOLDBERG (#287923)

dgoldberg@grosskleinlaw.com

GROSS & KLEIN LLP

The Embarcadero

Pier 9, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

t (415) 671-4628

f (415) 480-6688

JOSEPH R. SAVERI (#130064) 

jsaveri@saverilawfirm.com

ANDREW M. PURDY (#261912) 

apurdy@saverilawfirm.com

MATTHEW S. WEILER (#236052)

mweiler@saverilawfirm.com

KEVIN E. RAYHILL (#267496) 

krayhill@saverilawfirm.com

JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM, INC.

555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1210

San Francisco, CA 94111

t (415) 500-6800

f (415) 395-9940

Attorneys for Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians

and the Paskenta Enterprises Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS; 

and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES 

CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INES CROSBY; JOHN CROSBY; LESLIE 

LOHSE; LARRY LOHSE; TED PATA; JUAN 

PATA; CHRIS PATA; SHERRY MYERS; 

FRANK JAMES; UMPQUA BANK; UMPQUA 

HOLDINGS CORPORATION; 

CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANK; 

CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANCORP; 

JEFFERY FINCK; GARTH MOORE; GARTH 

MOORE INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL 

SERVICES, INC.; ASSOCIATED PENSION 

CONSULTANTS, INC.; HANESS & 

ASSOCIATES, LLC; ROBERT M. HANESS;

THE PATRIOT GOLD & SILVER 

EXCHANGE, INC.; NORMAN R. RYAN; 

GDK CONSULTING LLC; and GREG 

KESNER

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-00538-MCECMK

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

Case 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-DMC Document 218 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 3
____________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE; Case No. 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-CMK

 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GROSS LAW, P.C.

THE EMBARCADERO

PIER 9, SUITE 100

SAN FRANCISCO, CA

94111

WHEREAS, on May 20, 2016, the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and Paskenta 

Enterprises Corporation (“Plaintiffs”) filed the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) in this

action;

WHEREAS, any motion to dismiss the TAC by Defendant Umpqua Bank and Umpqua 

Holdings Corporation (“Umpqua”) and Defendant Associated Pension Consultants Inc. 

(“APC”) would be due on June 6, 2016; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 230, Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendant 

Umpqua’s and/or Defendant APC’s motion to dismiss the TAC would be due, at the latest, 

fourteen (14) days thereafter, on June 20, 2016; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 230, Defendant Umpqua’s and/or Defendant 

APC’s reply to Plaintiffs’ opposition would be due, at the latest, seven (7) days thereafter, on 

June 27, 2016;

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs has a previously scheduled oral argument before the 

9th Circuit Court of Appeals set for June 21, 2016, and would be hard-pressed to devote the 

necessary time and resources to the briefing required in this matter as the briefing schedule now 

stands;

WHEREAS, Defendant Umpqua, Defendant APC, and Plaintiffs, agree that it would be 

in the best interests of each of these parties to revise the briefing schedule mandated by the 

applicable rules;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and 

Defendants Umpqua and APC, on the other, by and through their respective counsel, pursuant to 

Civil Local Rules 143 and 144, and subject to approval by the Court:

1. Defendants Umpqua and APC shall have thirty (30) days from May 20, 2016, up 

to and including June 20, 2016, to file a responsive pleading in this matter;

2. If Defendants’ responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ TAC is in the form of a motion 

under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b):

A. Plaintiffs’ opposition to any such motion will be due thirty (30) days 

from the date Defendants’ motion is filed; and

Case 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-DMC Document 218 Filed 06/02/16 Page 2 of 3
____________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE; Case No. 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-CMK

 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GROSS LAW, P.C.

THE EMBARCADERO

PIER 9, SUITE 100

SAN FRANCISCO, CA

94111

B. Defendants’ reply in support of any such motion will be due fourteen (14) 

days from the date Plaintiffs’ opposition is filed. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:

DATED: May 31, 2016 GROSS & KLEIN LLP

By: /s/ Daniel C. Goldberg

Daniel C. Goldberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs PASKENTA BAND 

OF NOMLAKI INDIANS and PASKENTA 

ENTERPRISES CORPORATION

DATED: May 31, 2016 REED SMITH, LLP

By: /s/ Kasey J. Curtis (as authorized on 5/31/16)

Kasey J. Curtis

Attorneys for Defendants UMPQUA BANK, 

AND UMPQUA HOLDINGS 

CORPORATION

DATED: May 31, 2016 MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY, & FEENEY

By: /s/ William Munoz (as authorized on 5/31/16)

William Munoz

Attorneys for Defendants ASSOCIATED 

PENSION CONSULTANTS, INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 1, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-DMC Document 218 Filed 06/02/16 Page 3 of 3