Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02130/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02130-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT MARTINSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:21-cv-02130-DAD-JDP (PS)

ORDER 

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE A THIRD-PARTY 

COMPLAINT

ECF No. 20

Defendants move for leave to file a third-party complaint against Placer County Sheriff’s 

Office. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the 

motion, and the time to do so has passed. See ECF No. 21. The court construes plaintiff’s failure 

to timely file an opposition as a non-opposition to the motion. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c). Good 

cause appearing, defendants’ motion is granted.

According, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ motion for leave to file a third-party complaint, ECF No. 20, is granted.

2. Defendants are granted thirty days from the date of this order to file a third-party 

complaint against Placer County Sheriff’s Office. 

Case 2:21-cv-02130-DAD-JDP Document 23 Filed 01/16/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 16, 2024 

JEREMY D. PETERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:21-cv-02130-DAD-JDP Document 23 Filed 01/16/24 Page 2 of 2