Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-02415/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-02415-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Respondent/Plaintiff, 

vs.

Gregory Thomas Young, Jr., 

Movant/Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-10-2415-PHX-ROS (MHB)

No. CR-07-1217-PHX-ROS

ORDER

Pending before the Court is: (1) Movant/Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside or

correct sentence (the “Motion”); and (2) the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”). The Motion appears as Doc. 1 in civil case CV-10-2415 and Doc. 152 in criminal

case CR-07-1217. The R&R appears as Doc. 11 in civil case CV-10-2415. For the reasons

below, the R&R will be adopted in full.

A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has

filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district

court’s review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.”) (internal

quotations and citations omitted).

Case 2:10-cv-02415-ROS Document 12 Filed 12/30/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The R&R was issued November 21, 2011. No objections being made, the Court will

adopt the Report and Recommendation in full.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11 in civil case CV-10-

2415) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

IT IS ORDERED Petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (Doc.

1 in civil case CV-10-2415) and (Doc. 152 in criminal case CR-07-1217) is DENIED. 

IT IS ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal is denied because jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable,

and because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.

DATED this 29th day of December, 2011.

Case 2:10-cv-02415-ROS Document 12 Filed 12/30/11 Page 2 of 2