Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05579/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05579-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 140
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REINALDO G. RAMOS and JULIET R.

RAMOS,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

AURORA LOAN SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-05579 CW

ORDER CONCERNING

PLAINTIFFS’

OPPOSITION TO MOTION

TO DISMISS

On February 12, 2010, the Clerk of the Court notified the

parties of the briefing schedule for Defendant Mortgage Electronic

Registration Systems, Inc.’s (MERS) Motion to Dismiss. (Docket No.

16.) The Notice stated that Plaintiffs’ opposition would be due

February 25, 2010, with any reply due March 4, 2010.

Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition to MERS’ Motion. 

Plaintiffs shall file their opposition by March 2, 2010 and any

reply shall be due March 9, 2010. Failure by Plaintiffs to file a

written opposition to the Motion by March 2 will result in the

dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims against MERS for failure to

prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 26, 2010 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05579-EMC Document 17 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 1