Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05330/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05330-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

EAST PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

WEST\288481017.1 -1-

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING 

CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG) 

MARK FOWLER (Bar No. 124235) 

mark.fowler@dlapiper.com

CLAYTON THOMPSON (Bar No. 291331) 

clayton.thompson@dlapiper.com

YAKOV M. ZOLOTOREV (Bar No. 224260) 

jake.zolotorev@dlapiper.com

SUMMER TORREZ (Bar No. 264858) 

summer.torrez@dlapiper.com

JONATHAN HICKS (Bar No. 274634) 

jonathan.hicks@dlapiper.com

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 

Tel: 650.833.2000 

Fax: 650.833.2001 

ERIN P. GIBSON (Bar No. 229305) 

erin.gibson@dlapiper.com

PETER MAGGIORE (Bar No. 292534) 

peter.maggiore@dlapiper.com

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

401 B Street, Suite 1700 

San Diego, CA 92101-4297 

Tel: 619.699.2700 

Fax: 619.699.2701 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 

INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

APPLE INC., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 14-cv-05330 HSG 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

ORDER REGARDING CROSSMOTION TO STRIKE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE 

Case 4:14-cv-05330-HSG Document 353 Filed 11/22/19 Page 1 of 5
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

EAST PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

WEST\288481017.1 -2-

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING

CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-1(a)(5), and 7-12, Plaintiff DSS Technology 

Management, Inc. (“DSS”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), through their respective counsel 

of record, hereby stipulate as follows regarding Apple’s upcoming cross-motion to strike: 

WHEREAS, on January 16, 2019, the Court entered a Scheduling Order setting the 

Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline for October 31, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. (Dkt. 183); 

WHEREAS, on August 1, 2019, the Court entered an order resetting the Dispositive 

Motion Hearing Deadline from October 31, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. to December 19, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.; 

WHEREAS, on August 9, 2019, the parties submitted a stipulation (Dkt. 238) to extend 

the briefing schedule for the Dispositive and Daubert Motions, as follows: 

EVENT DEADLINE

Deadline for Dispositive Motions and 

Daubert Motions 

October 17, 2019 

Opposition to Dispositive Motions and 

Daubert Motions 

November 14, 2019 

Replies in Support of Dispositive 

Motions and Daubert Motions 

December 5, 2019 

WHEREAS, on August 9, 2019, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation (Dkt. 239); 

WHEREAS, on October 17, 2019, the parties filed Dispositive Motions and Daubert

Motions (Dkts. 258, 264, 265, 268); 

WHEREAS, on October 17, 2019, each of the parties also filed a Motion to Strike certain 

expert testimony (Dkts. 263, 270); 

WHEREAS, on October 25, 2019, the parties submitted a stipulation (Dkt. 296) agreeing 

to the same briefing schedule for the Motions to Strike as the Dispositive and Daubert Motions, 

as well as the following briefing schedule for DSS’ Second Motion to Strike portions of 

Dr. Fuja’s expert report regarding the claimed “server microcomputer” limitation as it relates to 

the priority date of the Patent-in-Suit: 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 4:14-cv-05330-HSG Document 353 Filed 11/22/19 Page 2 of 5
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

EAST PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

WEST\288481017.1 -3-

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING 

CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)

EVENT DEADLINE

Opposition to DSS’ Motion to Strike December 5, 2019 

Reply in Support of DSS’ Motion to 

Strike 

December 12, 2019 

WHEREAS, on October 31, 2019, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation (Dkt. 304); 

WHEREAS, on November 14, 2019, DSS filed an Opposition to Apple’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment (Dkt. 315) and a Second Motion to Strike portions of Dr. Fuja’s expert report 

regarding the claimed “server microcomputer” limitation as it relates to the priority date of the 

Patent-in-Suit (Dkt. 329); 

WHEREAS, DSS submitted a declaration from Mr. Denning in support of DSS’ 

Opposition to Apple’s Motion for Summary Judgment and a Second Motion to Strike portions of 

Dr. Fuja’s expert report regarding the claimed “server microcomputer” limitation as it relates to 

the priority date of the Patent-in-Suit (Dkt. 320); 

WHEREAS, Apple intends to file a cross-motion to strike the declaration of Mr. Denning 

(Dkt. 320) regarding the claimed “server microcomputer” limitation as it relates to the priority 

date of the Patent-in-Suit, on December 5, 2019 (“Upcoming Cross-Motion to Strike”); 

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to the following briefing schedule for Apple’s 

Upcoming Cross-Motion to Strike: 

EVENT DEADLINE

Opposition to Apple’s Upcoming 

Cross-Motion to Strike 

December 12, 2019 

Reply in Support of Apple’s Upcoming 

Cross-Motion to Strike 

No written reply 

WHEREAS, the Parties submit this briefing schedule so that, in the interest of efficiency, 

the Court may hear Apple’s Upcoming Cross-Motion to Strike at the December 19, 2019 hearing 

on the Dispositive and Daubert Motions; and 

Case 4:14-cv-05330-HSG Document 353 Filed 11/22/19 Page 3 of 5
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

EAST PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

WEST\288481017.1 -4-

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING

CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)

WHEREAS, the briefing schedule and the December 19, 2019 hearing date for the 

Upcoming Cross-Motion to Strike will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already set 

by this Court in this case. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), concurrence to the filing of this document was obtained 

from Niky Bagley, counsel for DSS Technology Management, Inc., on November 21, 2019. 

Dated: November 21, 2019 DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

By /s/ Summer Torrez 

MARK D. FOWLER 

CLAYTON THOMPSON 

YAKOV M. ZOLOTOREV 

ERIN P. GIBSON 

SUMMER TORREZ 

JONATHAN HICKS 

PETER MAGGIORE 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC 

By /s/ Niky Bagley 

CHRISTOPHER M. JOE 

ERIC W. BUETHER 

BRIAN A. CARPENTER 

NIKY BAGLEY 

KENNETH KULA 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DSS Technology Management, Inc. 

Case 4:14-cv-05330-HSG Document 353 Filed 11/22/19 Page 4 of 5
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

EAST PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

WEST\288481017.1 -5-

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO STRIKE HEARING 

CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG)

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: 11/22/2019 

By 

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 

United States District Judge

Case 4:14-cv-05330-HSG Document 353 Filed 11/22/19 Page 5 of 5