Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_10-cv-08112/USCOURTS-azd-3_10-cv-08112-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1640 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Deane Young and Shelia Young

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Brian T. Moynihan, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV10-8112 PCT DGC

ORDER

Plaintiff filed this action in this Court on July 1, 2010. The first page of Plaintiff’s

complaint suggests that she is seeking a temporary restraining order (Dkt. #1 at 1), but she

has filed no separate application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). If Plaintiff seeks

a TRO in this case, she must file an application for a TRO that complies with Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 65. Plaintiff’s application also must show that (a) she is likely to succeed

on the merits of this case, (b) she is likely to suffer irreparable harm if a TRO is not entered,

(c) the balance of equities tips in her favor, and (d) an injunction is in the public interest.

Winter v. NRDC, --- U.S. ---, 129 S. Ct. 365, 374 (2008); see Am. Trucking Ass’n, Inc. v. City

of L.A., 559 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir. 2009). 

The Court will not act on Plaintiff’s apparent request for a TRO unless an application

for a TRO is filed.

DATED this 2nd day of July, 2010.

Case 3:10-cv-08112-NVW Document 4 Filed 07/02/10 Page 1 of 1