Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00720/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00720-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

BEN ROSENFELD (State Bar #203845) 

Law Office of Dennis Cunningham 

115 1⁄2 Bartlett Street 

San Francisco, CA 94110 

Telephone: (415) 285-8091 

Facsimile: (415) 285-8092 

Email: ben.rosenfeld@comcast.net 

Attorney for Plaintiff Mark Burdett 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Deputy 

ELIZABETH DEELEY, State Bar #23079 

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3982 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

E-Mail: elizabeth.deeleyfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and Mark Shea 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARK BURDETT, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SFPD OFFICER RAMON REYNOSO 

(#854), et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C-06-720-JCS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE TO NOVEMBER 10, 2006 

 Whereas a further Case Management Conference is currently set for October 20, 2006 at 

1:30 p.m.; and 

17

Case 3:06-cv-00720-JCS Document 44 Filed 10/18/06 Page 1 of 2
2

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Whereas the parties have been working diligently to exchange written discovery, in 

furtherance of the understanding at the last Case Management Conference on August 25, 2006 

that the parties would use written discovery to reduce the number of depositions needed; and 

 Whereas plaintiff’s responses to defendants’ written discovery, after an extension, is due 

on October 26, 2006, after the date currently set for the next Case Management Conference; and 

 Whereas the parties are currently meeting and conferring over defendants responses to 

plaintiff’s written discovery, after an extension; and 

 Whereas the parties need additional time to complete this process in order to discuss with 

the Court what depositions they feel they will need to take, as well as to discuss a briefing 

schedule for dispositive motions; 

 Whereas a Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due one week before the 

Case Management Conference; and 

 Whereas November 10, 2006 is a Court holiday, 

 The parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the 

Court continue the Case Management Conference currently set for October 20, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. 

to November 17, 2006, at 1:30 p.m., so that the Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed 

by November 10, 2006. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 DATED: October 17, 2006 

By: s/ - Ben Rosenfeld __________

BEN ROSENFELD 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 DATED: October 17, 2006 

By: s/ Elizabeth Deeley___________

ELIZABETH DEELEY 

Attorneys for Defendants 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: October _____, 2006 ___________________________________ 

HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:06-cv-00720-JCS Document 44 Filed 10/18/06 Page 2 of 2