Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02082/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02082-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FLEXIBLE FUNDING LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 05-02082 JSW

ORDER CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

AND SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

The Court has received and considered the parties joint case management statement. On

June 9, 2005, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. On July 25, 2005, Plaintiff filed an amended

complaint, which appears to have rendered moot, in part, Defendant’s motion. Defendant’s

response to the amended complaint is due on August 23, 2005.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that by August 23, 2005, Defendant shall file its

response to Plaintiff’s amended complaint. If Defendant intends to renew its motion to dismiss

and/or transfer venue, it shall file such motion by that date, and Plaintiff’s response to

Defendant’s motion shall be due fourteen days thereafter. Defendant’s reply shall be filed seven

calendar days after Plaintiff’s opposition is filed. If the Court determines that the matter can be

decided on the papers, it will so notify the parties. Otherwise the parties shall appear for hearing

on October 7, 2005 at 9:00 a.m.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the case management conference is continued to

October 7, 2005 at 9:00 a.m., following the hearing on the motion to dismiss. If the Court

determines the motion on the papers, the case management conference shall be held on October
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

7, 2005, at 1:30 p.m. If the parties have a dispute relating to initial disclosures in the interim,

they shall follow this Court’s standing order relating to discovery disputes.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 15, 2005 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE