Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02950/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02950-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Reinaldo Sanchez, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Joe Arpaio, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-05-2950-PHX-DGC (MEA)

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Petitioner Reinaldo Sanchez’s civil rights complaint and

United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”).

Docs. ##1, 6. The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss the complaint without prejudice

for failure to comply with Rule 3.4, Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States

District Court for the District of Arizona, and Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Doc. #6 at 2. 

The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review

the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)

(“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the

subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (“The district judge . . . shall make a de novo

determination . . . of any portion of the magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific

written objection has been made[.]”). The Court will accept the R&R and dismiss the

complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or

modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed.

Case 2:05-cv-02950-DGC Document 8 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

R. Civ. P. 72(b) (same).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey’s R&R (Doc. #6) is accepted.

2. Petitioner Reinaldo Sanchez’s civil rights complaint (Doc. #1) is dismissed.

3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.

DATED this 10th day of May, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02950-DGC Document 8 Filed 05/11/06 Page 2 of 2