Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01472/USCOURTS-ca4-07-01472-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1472

DAVID A. ROBERTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN NICHOLAS, individually and in his

official capacity as Commissioner of Maine

Department of Health and Human Services; PETER

WALSH, individually and in his official

capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department

of Health and Human Services; KEVIN W.

CONCANNON, individually and in his official

capacity as Commissioner (former) of Maine

Department of Health and Human Services; MARK

O. VAN VALKENBURGH, individually and in his

official capacity as agent for the Maine

Department of Health and Human Services;

INGRID B. LAPOINTE, individually and in her

official capacity as agent for the Maine

Department of Health and Human Services; ANNEMARIE JOHNSON, individually and in her

official capacity as agent for the Maine

Department of Health and Human Services;

LORETTA DUMOND, individually and in her

official capacity as agent for the Maine

Department of Health and Human Services; MAINE

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(1:04-cv-02039-WDQ)

Submitted: December 7, 2007 Decided: January 9, 2008

Appeal: 07-1472 Doc: 27 Filed: 01/09/2008 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph B. Spillman, Assistant

Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,

Baltimore, Maryland; Christopher Coles Taub, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL, Augusta, Maine, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-1472 Doc: 27 Filed: 01/09/2008 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

David A. Roberts appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v.

Nicholas, No. 1:04-cv-02039-WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 26, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-1472 Doc: 27 Filed: 01/09/2008 Pg: 3 of 3