Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01950/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01950-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC NOLAN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ____________________________________ 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-1950 MMC (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

(Docket Nos. 2, 3, 5)

Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, file the above-titled civil rights

action on March 15, 2006. That same date, the Court notified plaintiff in writing that the

action was deficient due to his failure to pay the requisite filing fee or, instead, submit a

completed court-approved in forma pauperis ("IFP") application. Specifically, plaintiff

was informed that he had not used the correct IFP form, and had failed to include the

required trust account statement showing transactions for the preceding six months and a

certificate of funds form signed by an institution official. In said notice, plaintiff was

advised that his failure to pay the filing fee or, alternatively, to file a completed IFP

application, including the trust account statement and the signed certificate of funds form,

within thirty days, would result in dismissal of the action. Along with said notice, plaintiff

was sent a copy of the Court’s IFP application, instructions for completing it, and a return

envelope. On April 10, 2006, the Court received a new IFP application from plaintiff, but

not the completed and signed certificate of funds form, contrary to the Court’s instructions. 

Case 3:06-cv-01950-MMC Document 8 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

As more than thirty days have passed since the deficiency notice and plaintiff has

not completed the IFP application or paid the filing fee, the above-titled action is hereby

DISMISSED without prejudice. 

The incomplete applications to proceed in forma pauperis are hereby DENIED. In

light of the dismissal of this action, the request for appointment of counsel is DENIED as

well. 

This order terminates Docket Nos. 2, 3, and 5. 

The Clerk shall close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 1, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01950-MMC Document 8 Filed 06/01/06 Page 2 of 2