Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-24-13534/USCOURTS-ca11-24-13534-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-13534

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

NEKI PEAVY,

as administrator of the Estate of Corey Kindell, 

BILLY EUGENE KINDELL,

as surviving father of Corey Kindell, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

CORECIVIC, INC., et al.,

Defendants,

QIANA MOBLEY, 

CHRISTY DAVIS, 

VANESSA WISE, 

USCA11 Case: 24-13534 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 12/03/2024 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 24-13534

SHANIQUA WICKER, 

AMBERLYN FLOYD, 

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 3:22-cv-00095-DHB-BKE

____________________

Before JILL PRYOR,GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Neki Peavy and Billy Eugene Kindell appeal from the district 

court’s order granting Qiana Mobley, Christy Davis, Vanessa Wise, 

Shaniqua Wicker, and Amberlyn Floyd’s motion for summary 

judgment. However, that order is not final because Peavy and Kindell’s claims against Tashika McKinnon, which were stayed on account of her bankruptcy case, remain pending. See Corsello v. Lincare, Inc., 276 F.3d 1229, 1230 (11th Cir. 2001) (holding that claims

against a defendant that were subject to an automatic bankruptcy 

stay are still pending if they are not resolved by the district court); 

Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 

2012) (explaining that an order that disposes of fewer than all claims 

of all parties is not final); 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

USCA11 Case: 24-13534 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 12/03/2024 Page: 2 of 3
24-13534 Opinion of the Court 3

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies 

with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all 

other applicable rules.

USCA11 Case: 24-13534 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 12/03/2024 Page: 3 of 3