Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02042/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02042-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

L.H., A.Z., D.K., and D.R., 

on behalf of themselves and all

other similarly situated juvenile

parolees in California,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-06-2042 LKK GGH

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Presently before the court is defendants’ request for extension of time to comply

with this court’s May 21, 2007 order. Plaintiffs do not object to the granting of extra time to

June 25, 2007, but do object to the language of the proposed order as based on defendants’

schedule for production of outstanding discovery, filed May 21, 2007, which plaintiffs believe

does not provide for full compliance with the May 21, 2007 order. 

The court’s intent, as set forth in its May 21, 2007 order, was that all outstanding

discovery be produced in thirty days. Defendants’ schedule appears at first glance to comply

with that order; however, on closer reading it appears to permit discovery to be produced beyond

the time allowed by the order. For example, although the order requires all discovery, including

electronic discovery to be produced within thirty days, defendants concede that their schedule

Case 2:06-cv-02042-LKK-DAD Document 134 Filed 06/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

does not include all possible sources of electronic data. Plaintiffs are also concerned that

although not stated in their schedule, defendants have represented that they intend to amend their

responses. Therefore, defendants’ schedule is approved only insofar as it complies with the

court’s May 21, 2007 order. 

Defendants have also belatedly requested a discovery conference for electronic

discovery. The court will hold a conference on July 12, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. to determine why it

appears that serious electronic discovery efforts have only recently commenced to date and, if

appropriate, determine a remedy, or further schedule.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants shall have until June 25, 2007 to comply with this court’s May 21,

order, and produce all outstanding discovery.

2. Defendants’ schedule for production of outstanding, filed May 21, 2007, is

approved only insofar as it complies with the May 21, 2007 order.

3. Defendants’ request for a discovery conference regarding electronic discovery

is granted as set forth above.

DATED: 6/19/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:076

L.H.2042.eot

Case 2:06-cv-02042-LKK-DAD Document 134 Filed 06/19/07 Page 2 of 2