Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-05385/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-05385-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MINDEN PICTURES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

PEARSON EDUCATION, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 11-05385 WHA

NOTICE REGARDING 

ORAL ARGUMENT

After reviewing the written submissions, the Court is of the view that oral argument is

unnecessary and will proceed to issue an order soon and to vacate the hearing set for January 10. 

If, however, one counsel advises the Court in writing by NOON ON JANUARY 7 that most or all of

the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer of four or fewer years out of law school

(see Supplemental Order, dkt. no. 3 at ¶ 6), then the hearing will remain in place in order to

provide that opportunity. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-05385-WHA Document 53 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 1