Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02443/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02443-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:2 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FROM JULY 14, 2008 TO JULY 28, 2008 

Doc. 8008899 08-CV-02443-JSW

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP 

William M. Goodman (SBN 61305) 

wgoodman@kasowitz.com 

101 California Street, Suite 2050 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-6140 

Facsimile: (415) 398-5030 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 

GOLDENE SOMERVILLE, individually and 

on behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS (aka STRYKER 

ORTHOPEDICS; aka STRYKER 

ORTHOPEDICS, INC.); HOWMEDICA 

OSTEONICS CORPORATION; STRYKER 

CORPORATION; and STRYKER SALES 

CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

Case No: 08-CV-02443-JSW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY TO 

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

FROM JULY 14, 2008 TO JULY 28, 2008

STIPULATION

 Plaintiff Goldene Somerville and Defendants Stryker Orthopaedics, Howmedica 

Osteonics Corporation, Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation submit the following 

Stipulation and Proposed Order continuing the deadline for Defendants to file a Reply to 

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss from July 14, 2008 to July 28, 2008. 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:08-cv-02443-JSW Document 31 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:08-cv-02443-JSW Document 32 Filed 07/11/08 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FROM JULY 14, 2008 TO JULY 28, 2008 

Doc. 8008899 08-CV-02443-JSW

RECITALS

A. Whereas, on June 5, 2008, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss; 

B. Whereas, on June 18, 2008, the Court entered a briefing schedule requiring 

Plaintiff to file any opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss no later than July 7, 2008, and 

Defendants to file any Reply to Plaintiff’s opposition no later than July 14, 2008; 

C. Whereas, on July 7, 2008, Plaintiff filed her opposition to Defendants’ motion to 

dismiss; 

D. Whereas, Defendants seek an extension of time to file their Reply to Plaintiff’s 

opposition to address complex legal issues raised in Plaintiff’s Opposition; 

E. Whereas, the Parties all consent to continuing the deadline for Defendants to file a 

Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss from July 14, 2008 to July 28, 

2008; 

F. Whereas, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is currently scheduled to be heard by the 

Court on September 26, 2008; 

 BASED THEREON, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties as 

follows: The deadline for Defendants to file a Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss currently set for July 14, 2008 is continued to July 28, 2008. 

SO STIPULATED 

DATED: July 10, 2008 KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP 

 By: /s/ Brian S. Kabateck

 BRIAN S. KABATECK 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff Goldene Somerville 

Case 3:08-cv-02443-JSW Document 31 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:08-cv-02443-JSW Document 32 Filed 07/11/08 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FROM JULY 14, 2008 TO JULY 28, 2008 

Doc. 8008899 08-CV-02443-JSW

DATED: July 10, 2008 KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP

 By: /s/ William M. Goodman

 WILLIAM M. GOODMAN 

 Attorneys for Defendants Stryker Orthopaedics; 

 Howmedica Osteonics Corporation; Stryker 

 Corporation; and Stryker Sales Corporation 

Case 3:08-cv-02443-JSW Document 31 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 3 of 4 Case 3:08-cv-02443-JSW Document 32 Filed 07/11/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FROM JULY 14, 2008 TO JULY 28, 2008 

Doc. 8008899 08-CV-02443-JSW

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Having read and reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The deadline for Defendants to file a Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss currently set for July 14, 2008 is continued to July 28, 2008. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ____________________________________ 

 JEFFREY S. WHITE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:08-cv-02443-JSW Document 31 Filed 07/10/2008 Page 4 of 4

July 11, 2008

Case 3:08-cv-02443-JSW Document 32 Filed 07/11/08 Page 4 of 4