Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01517/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01517-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANUEL STELL,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

NORM KRAMER, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:14-cv-01517-AWI-GSA-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION 

BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR 

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON 

WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED, 

AND FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(Doc. 2.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 

TWENTY DAYS

Manuel Stell (“Plaintiff@) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 

with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. 

The Complaint commencing this action was filed by Plaintiff and fifteen co-plaintiffs 

on June 18, 2014. (Doc. 2.) On September 26, 2014, the court issued an order severing the 

plaintiffs’ claims, opening new cases for the plaintiffs, and ordering Plaintiff and each coplaintiff to file a First Amended Complaint in his own action within thirty days. (Doc. 1.) 

Plaintiff was granted two extensions of time in which to file the First Amended Complaint, and 

his latest deadline expired on March 30, 2015. (Docs. 4, 5.) Plaintiff has not filed a First 

Amended Complaint or otherwise responded to any of the court orders. As a result, there is no 

pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. 

Case 1:14-cv-01517-AWI-GSA Document 6 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A 

and 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2), this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff=s 

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section 1983, and for failure to 

prosecute.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(l). Within twenty 

(20) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file 

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to 

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 21, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01517-AWI-GSA Document 6 Filed 05/22/15 Page 2 of 2