Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04041/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04041-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

W02-EAST:7BXL1\200320280.2 

Civil Action No. 3:09-cv-04041-EMC 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 

A Limited Liability Partnership 

Including Professional Corporations 

STEVEN B. SACKS, Cal. Bar No. 98875 

MARTIN WHITE, Cal. Bar No. 253476 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4109 

Telephone: 415-434-9100 

Facsimile: 415-434-3947 

E-Mail: ssacks@sheppardmullin.com

 mwhite@sheppardmullin.com

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 

A Limited Liability Partnership 

Including Professional Corporations 

EDWARD H. TILLINGHAST, III 

30 Rockefeller Plaza, 24th Floor 

New York, New York 10112-2201 

Telephone: 212-653-8700 

Facsimile: 212-653-8701 

E-Mail: etillinghast@sheppardmullin.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

ADMINISTRATORS OF LESCIP T. LIMITED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CARRIE GOFRON, J. WILLIAM VANKE, 

ASHWINI KUMAR, MATTHEW MIXON, 

AND DULCE GONZALEZ, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

PICSEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., LESCIP T 

LIMITED (formerly PICSEL 

TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED), HAMSARD 

LIMITED, MASOOD JABBAR AND 

IMRAN KHAND, 

Defendants. 

 Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-04041-EMC 

[Complaint Filed: August 31, 2009] 

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

DEFENDANT LESCIP T LIMITED'S 

TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 6-1(a)

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

Trial Date: None Set 

Case 4:09-cv-04041-CW Document 23 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 3
-1- 

W02-EAST:7BXL1\200320280.2 

Civil Action No. 3:09-cv-04041-EMC 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS on August 31, 2009, Plaintiffs filed their original Complaint in this 

action; 

WHEREAS on May 21, 2010, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint, 

pursuant to which they, inter alia, added defendant LESCIP T. LIMITED ("Lescip") to the 

action; 

WHEREAS Lescip is a UK-based company that entered into administration (the 

"Administration") on July 15, 2009, and John Bruce Cartwright and Graham Frost were appointed 

Joint Administrators of Lescip (the "Administrators"); 

WHEREAS on June 16, 2010, the Administrators were allegedly served with the 

First Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS if service is deemed proper, the due date for the Administrators of 

Lescip to plead, answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint would have been on 

or about July 7, 2010; 

WHEREAS the Administrators of Lescip require additional time to evaluate the 

First Amended Complaint and plead, answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended 

Complaint; 

WHEREAS the parties believe and agreed on July 7, 2010, that it is prudent, 

desirable and efficient to extend the time for the Administrators of Lescip to respond to the First 

Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS an extension of time until Tuesday, August 3, 2010 for the 

Administrators of Lescip to plead, answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint 

will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order in this action; 

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), it is hereby stipulated and 

agreed by and between Plaintiffs and the Administrators of Lescip that: 

The Administrators of Lescip shall have through to and including Tuesday, August 

3, 2010 to plead, answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint in this action. 

Case 4:09-cv-04041-CW Document 23 Filed 07/13/10 Page 2 of 3
-2- 

W02-EAST:7BXL1\200320280.2 

Civil Action No. 3:09-cv-04041-EMC 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This stipulation is entered into without waiver of any and all defenses available to 

the Administrators of Lescip, including without limitation, lack of personal jurisdiction, improper 

service and that commencing this action against Lescip is a violation of the moratorium in the 

Administration, and is not a concession that service has been effected on Lescip or the 

Administrators of Lescip. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Dated: July 9, 2010 

 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 

By /s/ Steven B. Sacks

 STEVEN B. SACKS 

Attorneys for Defendant 

LESCIP T. LIMITED

Dated: July 9, 2010 

 CRAIG A. MARR, ATTORNEY AT LAW 

By /s/ Craig A. Marr 

 CRAIG A. MARR 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Case 4:09-cv-04041-CW Document 23 Filed 07/13/10 Page 3 of 3