Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01072/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01072-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1362 Declaration re: Indian Tribal Water Rights

---

Stipulation Extending Time For Opposition 

And Continuing Hearing Date 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Attorneys for Defendants 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Winnemem Wintu Tribe, in their tribal and 

individual capacities; Caleen Sisk Franco; Mark 

Franco, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

United States Department of the Interior; 

Bureau of Reclamation; Bureau of Indian 

Affairs; Bureau of Land Management; United 

States Forest Service; United States Department 

of Agriculture; and in their Individual 

Capacities, Kristy Cottini and J. Sharon 

Heywood, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:09-cv-01072 FCD EFB 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR 

PLAINTIFFS TO OPPOSE THE AGENCY 

DEFENDANTS’ PENDING MOTION 

TO DISMISS AND CONTINUING 

HEARING DATE; ORDER 

Old Date: February 26, 2010 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom 2, 15th Floor 

 501 I Street, Sacramento 

Judge: Hon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr. 

New Date: April 23, 2010

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom 2, 15th Floor 

 501 I Street, Sacramento 

Judge: Hon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr. 

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney 

LYNN TRINKA ERNCE 

Assistant United States Attorney 

501 I Street, Suite 10-100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2720 

Case 2:09-cv-01072-KJM-KJN Document 40 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation Extending Time For Opposition 

And Continuing Hearing Date 

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The parties to this action, by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that the 

time for plaintiffs to respond to the agency defendants’ Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 

[Docket No. 33] may be extended from February 12, 2010 to March 12, 2010, agency defendants’ reply 

shall be due on or before April 16, 2010, and the hearing on the motion shall be continued from February 

26, 2010 to April 23, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Thus, the briefing and hearing schedule will be as follows: 

Opposition Due By: 03/12/2010 

Reply Due By: 04/16/2010 

Hearing: 04/23/2010 at 10:00 a.m. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: January 27, 2010 REED SMITH LLP 

 

 By: /s/ Cheryl B. Kahn JAMES C. MARTIN 

 JAYNE E. FLEMING 

 EUGENIA S. CHERN 

 CHERYL B. KAHN 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DATED: January 27, 2010 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

 United States Attorney 

 

 By: /s/ Lynn Trinka Ernce 

 LYNN TRINKA ERNCE 

 Assistant United States Attorney 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 27, 2010 

Case 2:09-cv-01072-KJM-KJN Document 40 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2