Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00119/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00119-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC. 

TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS: CASE NO. 16-cv-00119-HSG

TAYLOR & CO. LAW OFFICES, LLP

THOMAS H.L. SELBY (pro hac vice)

DAVID M. KRINSKY (pro hac vice)

ADAM D. HARBER (pro hac vice)

CHRISTOPHER J. MANDERNACH (pro hac vice)

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP

725 Twelfth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005

Telephone: (202) 434-5000

Facsimile: (202) 434-5029

E-mail: tselby@wc.com

E-mail: dkrinsky@wc.com

E-mail: aharber@wc.com

E-mail: cmandernach@wc.com

STEPHEN E. TAYLOR (SBN 058452)

JONATHAN A. PATCHEN (SBN 237346)

TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP

One Ferry Building, Suite 355

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 788-8200

Facsimile: (415) 788-8208

E-mail: staylor@tcolaw.com

E-mail: jpatchen@tcolaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

DROPBOX, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

DROPBOX, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No.: 16-cv-00119-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC. 

TO 

FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 

TO DISMISS [CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2]

Date: April 28, 2016

Time: 2:00 PM

Place: Courtroom 15, 18th Floor

Complaint Filed: March 27, 2015

Case Transferred: January 8, 2016

Trial Date: None Set

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Case 4:16-cv-00119-HSG Document 91 Filed 03/29/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC. 

TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS: CASE NO. 16-cv-00119-HSG

TAYLOR & CO. LAW OFFICES, LLP

Defendant Dropbox, Inc. (“Dropbox”) and Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. 

(“Synchronoss”), by and through their respective counsel and subject to the Court’s approval, have 

met conferred and hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, in light of the Easter holiday and conflicting deadlines facing counsel for 

Dropbox, there is good cause to extend the date for Dropbox’s reply in support of its pending 

Motion to Dismiss (ECF 81) by one week, from March 31, 2016 to and including April 7, 2016;

WHEREAS, there has only been one prior time modification in this case when the Court 

granted Synchronoss’ motion for an extension of time to respond to Dropbox’s original February 

5, 2016 motion to dismiss (ECF 70, 71);

WHEREAS, the parties’ requested extension will have no impact on the schedule for the 

case or the Motion’s April 28, 2016 hearing date; the requested one-week extension will still leave 

the Court with three (3) weeks to review all of the papers submitted in support of and in 

opposition to the Motion, and prepare for the hearing; and the brief extension will not prevent the 

Motion from being fully briefed before the April 12 Initial Case Management Conference;

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 4:16-cv-00119-HSG Document 91 Filed 03/29/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC. 

TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS: CASE NO. 16-cv-00119-HSG

TAYLOR & CO. LAW OFFICES, LLP

NOW, THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, BY AND 

BETWEEN THE PARTIES THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, THAT subject to the 

Court’s approval: The date for Defendant Dropbox to file its reply in support of the currently 

pending Motion to Dismiss (ECF 81) is extended from March 31, 2016, to and including April 7, 

2016.

Dated: March 29, 2016 TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP

By: /s/ Jonathan A. Patchen

Jonathan A. Patchen

Attorneys for Defendant DROPBOX, INC.

Dated: March 29, 2016 DENTONS US LLP

By: /s/ Shailendra K. Maheshwari

Shailendra K. Maheshwari

Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNCHRONOSS 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 29, 2016 _______________________________________

HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:16-cv-00119-HSG Document 91 Filed 03/29/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC. 

TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS: CASE NO. 16-cv-00119-HSG

TAYLOR & CO. LAW OFFICES, LLP

ATTESTATION

I, Jonathan A. Patchen, am the ECF user whose ID an password are being used to file the 

above STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT DROPBOX, INC. TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO 

DISMISS. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that each listed counsel 

above has concurred in this filing.

By: /s/ Jonathan A. Patchen

Jonathan A. Patchen

Case 4:16-cv-00119-HSG Document 91 Filed 03/29/16 Page 4 of 4