Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00054/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00054-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH ROBINSON, et al., CASE NO. CV F 05-1258 OWW LJO

Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SET STATUS CONFERENCE

vs.

Date: August 1, 2006

JOHN SNOW, Secretary of the Time: 8:30 a.m.

Treasury, Dept.: 8 (LJO)

Defendant.

 /

This Court set a June 22, 2006 mandatory scheduling conference. Most of the plaintiffs recently

retained counsel after they had proceeded pro se. Plaintiffs’ recently retained counsel indicated that

plaintiffs will seek to file a further (second) amended complaint and that plaintiffs will file a proof of

service of their pending first amended complaint. Defendant has neither appeared in this action nor

acknowledged service of the summons and amended complaint. As such, postponement of the

mandatory scheduling conference is appropriate. On the basis of good cause, this Court:

1. VACATES the June 22, 2006 scheduling conference;

2. ORDERS plaintiffs, no later than July 12, 2006, to seek leave of this Court to file a

second amended complaint. Plaintiffs’ counsel is encouraged to contact Assistant U.S.

Attorney Brian Enos at (559) 497-4058 to address filing a second amended complaint;

3. ORDERS plaintiffs, after they receive leave to file a second amended complaint, to

forthwith serve the summons and second amended complaint on defendant;

Case 1:11-cv-00054-LJO -SKO Document 35 Filed 06/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. SETS a status conference for August 1, 2006 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 8 (LJO) of this

Court. The parties are encouraged to appear at the mandatory scheduling conference by

telephone by arranging a one-line conference call and then adding the Court at (559) 499-

5680. At the status conference, the parties shall be prepared to discuss the status of

plaintiffs’ second amended complaint and its service and whether the parties consent to

the conduct of all further proceedings before a United States Magistrate Judge;

5. DIRECTS this Court’s clerk to serve a copy of this order on Assistant U.S. Attorney

Brian Enos, 2500 Tulare Street, Suite #4401, Fresno, CA 93721, and if possible, by email.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 21, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00054-LJO -SKO Document 35 Filed 06/22/06 Page 2 of 2