Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02230/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02230-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

Corrected Stipulated Application Extension of Time to File Reply Papers

Case No. 2:11-CV-02230-WBS-AC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

James Sanchez, City Attorney (SBN 116356)

KATHLEEN T. ROGAN, Senior Deputy City Attorney (SBN 186055)

KRogan@cityofsaCJ·amento.org

CITY OF SACRAMENTO

Office: 915 I Street, 4th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 808-5346

Telecopier: (916) 808-7455

Attorneys for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO

Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF SACRAMENTO

CHARLES L. POST, State Bar No. 160443

weintraub genshlea chediak

tobin & tobin

LAW CORPORATION

400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

(916) 558-6000 – Main

(916) 446-1611 – Facsimile

Email: cpost@weintraub.com

Attorneys for Defendant RIVERBOAT DELTA KING, INC.

TIMOTHY S. THIMESCH, ESQ. (No. 148213)

158 Hilltop Crescent

Walnut Creek, CA 94597

Direct: (925) 588-0401

Facsimile: (888) 210-8868

tim@thimeschlaw.com

genefarber@gmail.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff HOLLYNN D’LIL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOLLYNN D’LIL,

Plaintiff,

v.

RIVERBOAT DELTA KING, INC.;

CITY OF SACRAMENTO; OLD

SACRAMENTO BUSINESS

ASSOCIATION, INC., 

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02230-WBS-AC

Civil Rights

PLAINTIFF’S CORRECTED STIPULATED 

APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE REPLY PAPERS RE 

PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

ADJUDICATION OR ALTERNATIVE STAY

/

TO THE COURT:

On August 25, 2014, the Court granted plaintiff a 36-hour 

extension, or through Noon on August 27, 2014, to file her 

opposition papers to the pending Motion for Summary Adjudication 

or Alternative Stay. See ECF-66. As a part of that request, 

the parties also sought to extend the time for the reply papers 

Case 2:11-cv-02230-WBS-AC Document 79 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 3
Corrected Stipulated Application Extension of Time to File Reply Papers

Case No. 2:11-CV-02230-WBS-AC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

through September 5, 2014 through midnight. Id. However, 

plaintiff’s counsel represents that he inadvertently submitted a 

word-version by email that stated a different cutoff time for 

the reply, or noon on September 5, 2014, which was the version 

approved by the Court. 

The parties hereby seek to correct plaintiff counsel’s 

error and submit this corrected stipulated application seeking 

to extend the time for the reply papers through midnight on 

September 5, 2014. There is good cause due to the size of the 

////

Case 2:11-cv-02230-WBS-AC Document 79 Filed 09/05/14 Page 2 of 3
Corrected Stipulated Application Extension of Time to File Reply Papers

Case No. 2:11-CV-02230-WBS-AC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

submissions and complexity of the issues.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: September 2, 2014 James Sanchez, City Attorney

KATHLEEN T. ROGAN, Sr. Deputy 

/s/ Signature Authorized

Attorneys for Defendant

CITY OF SACRAMENTO

Dated: September 2, 2014 CHARLES L. POST, ESQ.

weintraub genshlea chediak

tobin & tobin

/s/ - Charles L. Post

Attorneys for Defendants 

RIVERBOAT DELTA KING, INC.

Dated: September 2, 2014 THIMESCH LAW OFFICES 

TIMOTHY S. THIMESCH

/s/ Signature Authorized

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HOLLYNN D’LIL

ORDER

SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 5, 2014

Case 2:11-cv-02230-WBS-AC Document 79 Filed 09/05/14 Page 3 of 3