Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-2_11-cv-03577/USCOURTS-alnd-2_11-cv-03577-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALABAMA AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, 

INC., ALABAMA AIRCRAFT 

INDUSTRIES, INC. – BIRMINGHAM, AND 

PEMCO AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING 

SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE BOEING COMPANY,

BOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS, 

INC. AND BOEING AEROSPACE 

SUPPORT CENTER, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:11-cv-03577-RDP

ORDER

On August 5, 2016, the Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 

237) containing the recommendation that Boeing’s “Motion to Compel AAI’s Responses to 

Boeing’s Interrogatory No. 1 and Requests for Admission Nos. 6, 14, 15, 16, and 20” be granted

in part and denied in part. No objections were filed to this Report and Recommendation.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Special Master’s Report and 

Recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the Reports of the Special Master. The court 

further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Special Master. It is therefore ORDERED that 

Boeing’s “Motion to Compel AAI’s Responses to Boeing’s Interrogatory No. 1 and Requests for 

Admission Nos. 6, 14, 15, 16, and 20” is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. In 

particular, the court ORDERS that:

FILED

 2016 Sep-09 AM 09:24

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 2:11-cv-03577-RDP Document 268 Filed 09/09/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1. Boeing’s Motion is DENIED to the extent that it requests unprompted 

supplementation from AAI of its Interrogatory #1 responses;

2. Boeing’s Motion is DENIED to the extent that it challenges the sufficiency of 

AAI’s answers to the Disputed RFAs; and

3. Boeing’s Motion should be GRANTED to the extent that Boeing wishes to 

submit specific, good-faith requests to AAI for additional information regarding its Interrogatory 

#1 responses.

DONE and ORDERED this September 8, 2016.

_________________________________

R. DAVID PROCTOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cv-03577-RDP Document 268 Filed 09/09/16 Page 2 of 2