Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-81/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099 

tboutrous@gibsondunn.com 

THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 

tevangelis@gibsondunn.com 

DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN 

254433 

dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 

Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 

jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com 

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289 

kringdowell@gibsondunn.com 

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 

Telephone: 415.393.8200 

Facsimile: 415.393.8306 

Attorneys for Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, 

LLC, and Travis Kalanick 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, SBN 310719 

sliss@llrlaw.com 

ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice 

apagano@llrlaw.com 

729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 

Boston, MA 02116 

Telephone: 617.994.5800 

Facsimile: 617.994.5801 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242 

mcarlson@llrlaw.com 

466 Geary St., Suite 201 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Telephone: 617.994.5800 

Facsimile: 617.994.5801 

Attorneys for O’Connor and 

Yucesoy Plaintiffs 

[Additional Counsel Listed on Following Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Defendant. 

 CASE NO. 13-cv-03826-EMC 

CASE NO. 14-cv-05200-EMC 

CASE NO. 15-cv-00262-EMC 

CASE NO. 15-cv-03667-EMC 

CASE NO. 16-cv-03134-EMC 

JOINT STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. 

 Defendants. 

IN RE UBER FCRA LITIGATION 

RICARDO DEL RIO, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. 

Defendants. 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 783 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

TODD JOHNSTON, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Defendant. 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, SBN 245998 

aspurchise@littler.com 

333 Bush Street, 34th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Tel: 415.433.1940 

Fax: 415.399.8490 

Attorneys for Uber Technologies, Inc. and 

Rasier, LLC 

THE BRANDI LAW FIRM 

Thomas J. Brandi, SBN 53208 

tjb@brandilaw.com 

Brian J. Malloy, SBN 234882 

bjm@brandilaw.com 

354 Pine Street, Third Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

415.989.1800 

SLACK & DAVIS, LLP 

Michael L. Slack, pro hac vice

mslack@slackdavis.com 

John R. Davis, SBN 308412 

jdavis@slackdavis.com 

2705 Bee Cave Road, Suite 220 

Austin, TX 78746 

Attorneys for Johnston Plaintiff Todd Johnston 

HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC 

CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER, SBN 197117 

chamner@hamnerlaw.com 

AMY T. WOOTTON, SBN 188856 

awootton@hamnerlaw.com 

555 W. 5th Street, 31st Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90013 

Telephone: 213.533.4160 

Facsimile: 213.533.4167 

GERAGOS & GERAGOS, APC 

MARK J. GERAGOS, SBN 108325 

mark@geragos.com 

BENJAMIN MEISELAS, SBN 227412 

meiselas@geragos.com 

644 South Figueroa Street 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: 213.625.3900 

Facsimile: 213.232.3255 

KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP 

BRIAN KABATECK, SBN 152054 

bsk@kbklawyers.com 

SHANT A. KARNIKIAN, SBN 285048 

sk@kbklawyers.com 

644 South Figueroa Street 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: 213.217.5000 

Facsimile: 213.217.5010 

Attorneys for Del Rio Plaintiffs and Douglas 

O’Connor individually 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 783 Filed 01/24/17 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the O’Connor Plaintiffs, the Yucesoy Plaintiffs, the Del Rio 

Plaintiffs, the Johnston Plaintiffs, and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”), Rasier, LLC 

(“Rasier”), and Travis Kalanick (together, the “Defendants”) (together with the Plaintiffs, the 

“Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:1 

WHEREAS, the court presiding over the case captioned Steven Price v. Uber Technologies, 

Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC554512 (“Price”) previously set a hearing on the Price

parties’ forthcoming joint request for approval of a Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) 

settlement in the Price matter (“Joint Request”) for January 23, 2017; 

WHEREAS, on November 21, 2016, the Court stayed each of the five above-captioned cases 

until the next scheduled Case Management Conference (“CMC”); 

WHEREAS, the Court set the date of the next CMC for February 2, 2017, at 11:00 a.m., see

O’Connor Dkt. 769, in part based on the date of the Price settlement hearing; 

WHEREAS, the Price Court, acting sua sponte, rescheduled the date of the Price settlement 

hearing from January 23, 2017, to April 25, 2017, because the Price Court was no longer available to 

conduct the settlement approval hearing on January 23, 2017; 

WHEREAS, the Price parties thereafter held a scheduling conference with the Price Court, 

during which the Price Court rescheduled the settlement approval hearing for March 8, 2017; 

 

1

 The In re Uber FCRA Litigation Plaintiffs would not agree to change the date of the forthcoming 

Case Management Conference in In re Uber FCRA Litigation, Case No. 14-cv-05200-EMC, and 

therefore are not party to this stipulation. However, with this filing, Defendants request that the 

Case Management Conference and accompanying Case Management Conference statement filing 

deadline for In re Uber FCRA Litigation also be changed to March 23, 2017 and March 16, 2017, 

respectively, so that all Case Management Conferences and accompanying deadlines may take 

place on the same date. 

 If the Case Management Conference for the In re Uber FCRA Litigation is not changed, then the

O’Connor and Yucesoy plaintiffs do not agree to postpone their Case Management Conference, 

unless the In re Uber FCRA Litigation conference is used solely to discuss the scheduling and 

status of the settlement agreement in that case. 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 783 Filed 01/24/17 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

WHEREAS, this Court indicated that it wanted to schedule the next Case Management 

Conference for a date after the Price Court has conducted the settlement approval hearing, and if the

Court still desires to hold the Conference after that date; 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that: 

1. The Case Management Conference set for February 2, 2017, shall be reset for 

March 23, 2017. 

2. Case Management Conference Statements shall be due on March 16, 2017. 

3. Each of the above-captioned cases shall remain STAYED until the next Case 

Management Conference. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Dated: January 20, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

 /s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. 

Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. 

 Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, 

LLC, and Travis Kalanick

Dated: January 20, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

 /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan 

Shannon Liss-Riordan

 Attorneys for O’Connor and Yucesoy Plaintiffs 

 

Dated: January 20, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

 /s/ Andrew M. Spurchise 

Andrew M. Spurchise 

 Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. 

and Rasier, LLC 

 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 783 Filed 01/24/17 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

Dated: January 20, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

GERAGOS & GERAGOS, APC 

 /s/ Mark J. Geragos 

Mark J. Geragos 

 Attorneys for Del Rio Plaintiffs and Douglas O’Connor

 

Dated: January 20, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

THE BRANDI LAW FIRM 

 /s/ Brian J. Malloy 

Brian J. Malloy

 Attorneys for Plaintiff Todd Johnston 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________, 2017 ____________________________________ 

The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

United States District Judge 

The CMC is reset from 2/2/17 

to 3/23/17 at 11:00 a.m. An 

updated joint CMC statement 

shall be filed by 3/16/17. 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 783 Filed 01/24/17 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 

JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NOS. 13-CV-03826-EMC; 14-CV-05200; 15-CV-00262-EMC; 15-CV-03667; 16-CV-03134 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

I, Kevin Ring-Dowell, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from counsel for all parties. 

Dated: January 20, 2017 By: /s/ Kevin Ring-Dowell. 

 Kevin Ring-Dowell 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 783 Filed 01/24/17 Page 6 of 6