Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-03921/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-03921-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT PRE-TRIAL STATEMENTS C03-03921 JW

317520_2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (#88625) 

NORA FRIMANN, Chief Trial Attorney (#93249) 

ROBERT FABELA, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (#148098) 

Office of the City Attorney 

200 East Santa Clara Street 

San Jose, California 95113 

Telephone: (408) 535-1900 

Attorneys for CITY OF SAN JOSE, ALMA SENIOR CENTER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MONICA S. MARTINEZ, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITY OF SAN JOSE, ALMA SENIOR 

CENTER, and DOES 1 - 20, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case Number: C03-03921 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: JOINT PRE-TRIAL 

STATEMENT 

 WHEREAS, on February 28, 2005, this Court issued an order which included a 

deadline of July 29, 2005 for the submission of a Joint Pre-Trial Statement and motions in 

limine; 

WHEREAS, the parties began discussing the contents of the Joint Pre-Trial 

Statement and required more time to finalize the Joint Pre-Trial Statement and complete 

their motions in limine; 

WHEREAS, this Court graciously granted the parties’ previous request to change the 

date for the submission of the Joint Pre-Trial Statement and the motions in limine to August 

5, 2005; 

//

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT PRE-TRIAL STATEMENTS C03-03921 JW

317520_2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WHEREAS, the Joint Pre-Trial Statement was submitted this day, August 5, 2005, as 

per the latest order; 

 WHEREAS, plaintiff’s counsel informed defendants he needed more time to complete 

motions in limine and asked defendants to stipulate to an extension of the submission date 

for motions in limine from August 5, 2005 to August 11, 2005; 

 WHEREAS, defendants so stipulated. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The date by which the parties must submit motions in limine shall be continued 

to August 11, 2005; 

2. All other dates contained, including the date to file and serve motion in limine 

oppositions and the trial date, shall remain unchanged. 

Dated: August 5, 2005 _________/s/_ ______________

PATRICK E. STANDIFER 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: August 5, 2005 _________/s/_ ______________

ROBERT FABELA 

Attorney for Defendants 

ORDER

 The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties now orders as follows: 

1. The date by which the parties must submit their motions in limine shall be 

continued to August 11, 2005; 

2. All other dates contained in the February 28, 2005 Order, including the date to 

file and serve motion in limine oppositions and trial date, shall remain unchanged. 

Dated: _____________ __________________________________ 

HONORABLE JAMES WARE 

United State District Court Judge 

8/8/05 /s/ James Ware