Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01171/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01171-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:185 Employee Pension Plan

---

I

2

3

4

5

6

7

I

9

l0

ll

12

l3

14

l5

t6

t7

18

t9

20

2t

22

ZJ

24

25

26

27

28

Ronald L, Richman, SBN 139189

Susan J. Olson, SBN 152467

BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC

235 Pine Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: 41 5.352.27 00

Facsimile: 41 5.3 52.27 0l

E-Mail : ron.richman@bullivant,com

susan. olson@bul I ivant'com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

TINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case No.: 5: l6-cv-01 I 7 I -BLF BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE

LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE

TRUST FLIND FOR NORTHERN

CAI,IFORNIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF

.THE LABORERS VACATION-HOLIDAY

TRI.JST FLIND FOR NORTHERN

CALIF'ORNIA; BOARD OF TRUS'IEES OF

THE LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND

FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; and

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE

LABORERS TRAINING AND RETRAINING

TRTJST FLTND FOR NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiffs,

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

RETENTION OF JURISDICTION;

ORDER THEREON

VS

VALLEY DEMOLITION, INC., a California

Corporation,

Defendant.

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and

Defendant Valley Demolition, Inc., on the other hand, through their respective counsel, that

pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and Release and Stipulation for Dismissal ("Agreement"),

whioh is expressly incorporatecl by reference into this Stipulation for Dismissal Without

prejudice and Retention of Jurisdiction, that this Court dismiss this action, without prejudice,

1

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Case 5:16-cv-01171-BLF Document 22 Filed 07/20/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

I

9

l0

1l

t2

l3

t4

15

t6

17

l8

t9

20

2l

,)

23

24

25

26

27

28

and retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the Agreement should any action be required

to enforce the Agreement after the dismissal without prejudice is entered by the Court,

DATED: lutyJO, zOtO

BTJLLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC

By /r**ail.h-u

Ronald L. Richman

Attorneys for P laintiffs

DATED: JulyEo,2g16

THE LITIGATION LAW GROUP

By

Linda

Attorneys for Defendant

-2-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Case 5:16-cv-01171-BLF Document 22 Filed 07/20/16 Page 2 of 3
I

2

â

J

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

l1

12

13

14

l5

16

l7

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

pursuant to the parties' Stipulation and Agreement, which terms and conditions are fully

incorporated herein by this reference, and good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed, without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this court shall expressly retain jurisdiction over this

matter to enforce the Agreement should any action be required to enforce the Agreement after

the dismissal without prejudice is entered by the Court. See generally Kokkonen v' Guardian

Life Ins. Co. of America, 51 I US 357,381 (l9gÐ; Hagestad v. Tragesser, 49 F '3d 1430' 1432

19tr'cir. 1995).

DATED 2016

By

HON. BETH LABSON FREEMAN

LINITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4836-6t26-8277 .l

-3*

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

-XO\

Case 5:16-cv-01171-BLF Document 22 Filed 07/20/16 Page 3 of 3