Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-02110/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-02110-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:18-CV-02110-EMC 

CHRIS H. STEWART (Ark. Bar No. 03-222) 

arklaw@comcast.net 

Admission Pro Hac Vice 

STEWART LAW FIRM

P.O. Box 25862 

Little Rock, AR 72221 

Telephone: (501) 353-1364 

Facsimile: (501) 712-3597 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 

P.S. Products, Inc. and Billy Pennington 

CHRIS HOLLAND (SBN 164053) 

cholland@hollandlawllp.com 

PEI HSIEN REN (SBN 294252) 

pren@hollandlawllp.com 

HOLLAND LAW LLP

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Tel.: (415) 200-4980 

Fax.: (415) 200-4989 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

ContextLogic Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

P.S. PRODUCTS, INC.,

an Arkansas corporation; and 

BILLY PENNINGTON, an individual 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

CONTEXTLOGIC INC., 

d/b/a/ www.wish.com 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. 3:19-CV-02110-EMC 

JOINT STIPULATION OF 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Case 3:19-cv-02110-EMC Document 40 Filed 08/29/19 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:18-CV-02110-EMC 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties that this action 

against the Defendant, ContextLogic Inc., is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

Dated: August 28, 2019 Respectfully submitted,

Stewart Law Firm 

By: /s/ Chris Stewart

Chris Stewart 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: August 28, 2019 Respectfully submitted,

Holland Law LLP 

By: /s/ Chris Holland

Chris Holland 

Attorneys for Defendant

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document 

has been obtained from counsel for Defendant. 

Dated: August 28, 2019 

/s/ Chris Stewart 

Dated: 8/28/2019

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:19-cv-02110-EMC Document 40 Filed 08/29/19 Page 2 of 2