Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01198/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01198-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANUEL AYALA ALVAREZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1198 MCE EFB PS

vs.

SGT. BANNING, Badge #179;

DEPUTY ROSS, Badge #798; and

DEPUTY TREAT, Badge #626,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On September 27, 2006, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause within twenty

days why the above-captioned case should not be dismissed for failure to complete service of

process. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order to show

cause.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that the above-captioned case be

dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E. D. Cal. R. 11-

110. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

Case 2:06-cv-01198-MCE -EFB Document 8 Filed 11/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive

the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir.

1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 8, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-01198-MCE -EFB Document 8 Filed 11/08/06 Page 2 of 2