Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01206/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01206-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REFUGIO CONTRERAS-OJEDA, )

)

Petitioner, )

v. )

)

SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF )

HOMELAND SECURITY, )

)

Respondent. )

)

____________________________________)

CV F 05-1206 REC WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO 

TRANSFER ACTION TO THE

NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF

APPEALS

[Doc. 8]

Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241 . The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

On December 21, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. 

These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty

days. No objections were filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

(9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and th

Case 1:05-cv-01206-REC-WMW Document 9 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

ACCORDINGLY:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

 December 21, 2005, are a adopted in full;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to transfer this petition to the United States Court of

Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01206-REC-WMW Document 9 Filed 03/13/06 Page 2 of 2