Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-73/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

08929/2110234.1 -1- Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MATSUSHITA'S MOTION TO SEAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MEDIATEK, INC., OPPO DIGITAL, INC., 

and MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL 

COMPUTER CORP.,

Defendants.

MEDIATEK, INC.,

Counterclaimant,

vs.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD. and PANASONIC 

CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA,

Counterdefendants.

CASE NO. 05-CV-3148-MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

MEDIATEK'S REQUESTED RELIEF TO 

FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 79-5(d) 

(DOCKET ITEM 693) AND DENYING IN

PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

IN PART

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 799 Filed 05/03/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

08929/2110234.1 -2- Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MATSUSHITA'S MOTION TO SEAL

On April 20, 2007, plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Matsushita Electric 

Industrial Co., Ltd. filed an unopposed motion for administrative relief to file documents under 

seal in relation to Matsushita's Motion to Strike (Docket No. 693). Matsushita filed concurrently a 

Declaration of Keith P. Gray in Support of Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Matsushita 

Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.'s Unopposed Motion for Administrative Relief to File Documents 

Under Seal. (Docket No. 694).

Before the Court is the Declaration of Randall T. Garteiser in Support of Plaintiff 

and Counterclaim Defendant Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.'s Unopposed Motion for 

Administrative Relief to File Documents Under Seal With Respect to Defendants' Confidential 

Business Information.

The Court, having reviewed the evidence in support of the motion to seal, finds that 

the following documents reflect defendants' confidential business information and constitute 

“sealable” material under Local Rule 79-5(a). Accordingly, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to 

file under seal unredacted versions of the following documents:

• Exhibits 3, 19, 21, 28, and 31 to the Declaration of Aldo A. Badini In Support of 

Motion To Strike The Declarations Of Jeffrey Bokor, Lee Soon Peng, Chao Chun Twu, And 

Steven Wasserman In Support Of Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment, filed on April 20, 

2007, at Docket Item 691 ("Badini Declaration"). 

Defendants have further submitted redacted versions of exhibits lodged by 

Matsushita, and filed public versions of such documents. The Court finds that the redacted 

portions of the following documents constitute "sealable" material under Local Rule 79-5(a). 

Accordingly, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to file under seal unredacted versions of the 

following documents that have been filed in a public version:

• Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 18, 22, 26, 39, 40, and 41 to the Badini Declaration.

Matsushita has filed a public version of its Motion to Strike with redactions 

reflecting confidential business information designated by defendants at Docket Item 690. The 

Court finds that the redacted portions of Matsushita's Motion To Strike constitute "sealable" 

material under Local Rule 79-5(a). Accordingly, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to file under 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 799 Filed 05/03/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

08929/2110234.1 -3- Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MATSUSHITA'S MOTION TO SEAL

seal unredacted versions of Matsushita's Motion To Strike that Matsushita has already filed in a 

public version at Docket Item 690.

DATED: May , 2007

The Honorable Maxine Chesney

United States District Court Judge

Finally, plaintiff's motion is hereby DENIED, as it pertains to Exhibit 27 to the Declaration of

Aldo A. Badini, because defendants represent that said exhibit is not sealable. (See Garteiser Decl.

¶ 2(j).)

3

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 799 Filed 05/03/07 Page 3 of 3