Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01126/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01126-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIMBERLY R. OLSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

DARREL LEMOS, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:06-cv-1126-TLN-CMK

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On November 20, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 

within a specified time. (ECF No. 69.) Defendants filed timely objections to the findings and 

recommendations. (ECF No. 70.)

In accordance with the provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this

Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis. Defendants’ request for clarification as to the search and seizure claim, however, is well 

taken. To be clear, Plaintiff’s claim as to the legality of the search and seizure is limited to any 

claim she has as to items seized which were utilized in the underlying prosecution.

Case 2:06-cv-01126-TLN-CMK Document 71 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 20, 2014, are adopted in 

full;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 64) is granted in part and denied in 

part;

3. All Defendants except Lemos are dismissed from this action;

4. This action shall continue against Defendant Lemos only, on the claims of 

violation of Plaintiff’s Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights for unlawful 

arrest and search/seizure without probable cause; and

5. Defendant Lemos shall file a response to the amended complaint within 30 

days of the date of this opinion.

Dated: March 30, 2016

Case 2:06-cv-01126-TLN-CMK Document 71 Filed 03/31/16 Page 2 of 2