Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00009/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00009-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOMER EARL HAWKINS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

S. IBARRA, et al.,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:14-cv-000009-AWI-BAM (PC)

ORDER REGARDING CONSENT TO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION 

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT 

TO SEND CONSENT FORM TO 

PLAINTIFF

)

)

Plaintiff Homer Early Hawkins (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 30, 2016, Defendant Ibarra’s motion 

for summary judgment was denied, and the matter was returned to the undersigned for further 

proceedings. (ECF No. 42.) This case is now ready to be set for jury trial on Plaintiff’s claim 

against Defendant Ibarra for excessive force.

Out of fairness, the Court believes it is necessary to forewarn litigants that the Fresno 

Division of the Eastern District of California now has one of the heaviest District Judge caseload 

in the entire nation. While the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this case and all other civil 

cases in a timely manner, the parties are admonished that not all of the parties’ needs and 

expectations may be met as expeditiously as desired. Multiple trials are being set on the Court’s 

calendar to begin upon the same date. Parties whose trials are set to begin on the same day as 

other cases may find their own case trailing with little notice before their trial is set to begin. The 

law requires the Court give any criminal case priority over civil trials and other matters, and the 

Case 1:14-cv-00009-BAM Document 43 Filed 10/03/16 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Court must proceed with criminal trials even if a civil trial is older or was set earlier. If multiple 

trials are scheduled to begin on the same day, a civil trial will trail day to day or week to week 

until completion of any criminal case or older civil case. 

The parties are reminded of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to 

conduct all proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to conduct 

trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. 

Defendant Ibarra consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction on January 8, 2014. (ECF 

No. 4), and Plaintiff declined Magistrate Judge jurisdiction on January 31, 2014. (ECF No. 9).

Now that this case is ready for a trial setting, the Court will direct the Clerk of the Court to 

provide Plaintiff with the Court’s standard form to consent to or decline Magistrate Judge 

jurisdiction. Within twenty (20) days of this order’s date of service, Plaintiff shall either consent 

to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by filling out the requisite forms and returning them 

to the Court. The parties are advised that the same jury pool is used by both United States 

Magistrate Judges and United States Article III District Court Judges. Any appeal from a 

judgment entered by a United States Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court 

of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. 

Finally, for the parties’ information, the Fresno Division whenever possible is utilizing 

United States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the country as Visiting Judges. 

Pursuant to the Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties 

will receive no advance notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court 

Judge from outside of the Eastern District of California.

The parties are hereby informed that no substantive rulings or decisions will be affected 

by whether a party chooses to consent or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with the forms that will 

allow him to consent or decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction; 

///

Case 1:14-cv-00009-BAM Document 43 Filed 10/03/16 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Within twenty (20) days from this order’s date of service, Plaintiff shall notify 

the Court whether he consents to or declines Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by filling out the 

enclosed forms and returning them to the Court; and

3. Following receipt of the consent/decline form from Defendants, this case will be 

set for trial before either the District Judge or the undersigned.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 3, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00009-BAM Document 43 Filed 10/03/16 Page 3 of 3