Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01989/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01989-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Christopher Edward Briones, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Dora B. Schriro; et. al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-01989-PHX-ROS (JRI)

ORDER

On February 3, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge Irwin issued a Report and

Recommendation. (Doc. 47). On February 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension

to file objections, which was denied. (Docs. 48, 49). Plaintiff has not objected to the Report

and Recommendation.

A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has

filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district

court’s review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.”) (internal

quotations and citations omitted).

Case 2:09-cv-01989-ROS Document 52 Filed 04/01/11 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

No objections being made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in

full.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 47) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendants Gordon, Ickes, Burke, Shriro and Stewart

are DISMISSED for failure to effect timely service.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:

(1) Defendant Haley is ordered to respond to the surviving claims in the First

Amended Complaint as recommended by Magistrate Judge Irwin in the Report and

Recommendation.

(2) The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a service packet including both

summons and request for waiver forms for said Defendant.

(3) Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of the Court

within 20 days of the date of the filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not

provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order.

(4) The United States Marshal shall retain the Summons, a copy of the First Amended

Complaint, a copy of this Order, and a copy of Magistrate Judge Irwin’s Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 12) for future use.

(5) The United States Marshal shall notify Defendant Haley of the commencement of

this action and request waiver of service of the summons pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure. The notice shall include a copy of this Order and a copy of Judge

Irwin’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12). The Marshall shall file waivers of service

of the summons or requests for waivers that were returned as undeliverable as soon as they

are received. If a waiver of service of summons is not returned by Defendants within thirty

days from the date the request for waiver was sent by the Marshal, the Marshal shall:

(a) Personally serve copies of the Summons, the First Amended Complaint, this

Order, and Judge Irwin’s Report and Recommendation upon Defendants pursuant to Rule

4(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Case 2:09-cv-01989-ROS Document 52 Filed 04/01/11 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

(b) Within ten days after personal service is effected, file the return of service

for the Defendants, along with evidence of the attempt to secure a waiver of service of the

summons and of the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service upon the Defendants.

The costs of service shall be enumerated on the return of service form (USM-285) and shall

include the costs incurred by the Marshal for photocopying additional copies of the

Summons, First Amended Complaint, this Order, and the Report and Recommendation, and

for preparing new process receipt and return forms, if required. Costs of service will be

taxed against the personally served Defendant pursuant to Rule 4(d)(2) and (5) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

(6) Defendants who agree to waive service of the Summons and such amended

complaint shall return signed waiver forms to the United States Marshal, and not to Plaintiff.

(7) Said Defendants shall answer the First Amended Complaint or otherwise respond

by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a)

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(8) Any answer or responsive pleading shall state the specific Defendant(s) by name

on whose behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, responsive pleading, or other

motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant(s) by name on whose behalf

it is filed.

DATED this 1st day of April, 2011.

Case 2:09-cv-01989-ROS Document 52 Filed 04/01/11 Page 3 of 3