Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-91-05048/USCOURTS-ca10-91-05048-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 

---

.. 

t' FILED 

Unit.eel States C.ourtof Appeal:3 Tenth Circuit 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

TENTH CIRCUIT SEP O 3 1991 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

CARL DEMETRIUS MITCHELL, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

vs. 

TED WALLMAN, Warden, 

ROBERT H. HENRY, Attorney 

General, State of Oklahoma, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 91-5048 

D.C. No. 88-C-433-C 

( N. D. Ok la . ) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

f d . . d ** Be ore LOGAN, MOORE an BALDOCK, Circuit Ju ges. 

Petitioner-appellant Carl Demetrius Mitchell appeals from the 

district court's dismissal of his habeas corpus petition and 

denial of a certificate of probable cause. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2254 

& 2253. We DENY a certificate of probable cause and DISMISS the 

habeas corpus petition substantially for the reasons set forth in 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not assist the 

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th 

Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case therefore is ordered submitted without 

o r a l argument. 

Appellate Case: 91-5048 Document: 010110084254 Date Filed: 09/03/1991 Page: 1 
... 

the attached district court order. See also 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b); 

Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 (1982). 

Entered for the Court 

Bobby R. Baldock 

Circuit Judge 

-2-

Appellate Case: 91-5048 Document: 010110084254 Date Filed: 09/03/1991 Page: 2 
... ( ' . • 

.·· ~- --·_:..., . -___ , . _.. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA FILED f0-

CARL DEMETRIUS MITCHELL, 

Petition er, 

vs. 

TED WALLMAN, et al., 

Defendan ts. 

} 

} 

} 

} 

} 

} 

} 

} 

} 

ORDER 

K~R - I l991 

J ACi, C. SiLV C: i1 . CLERK 

U.S. CIS T?(!CT COURT 

No. 88-C-433-C / 

The Court has received notice from the Attorney General for 

the State . of Oklahoma that the State has fully complied with the 

Court's order of March 22, 1990 by providing petitioner with a 

trial by jury in cases CRF-87-36 and CRF-87-876. 

Following entry of judgments of conviction from the trial of 

those cases, petitioner filed a pleading raising issues regarding 

his court-appointed attorney, the trial judge and the proceedings. 

These issues are not matters raised in the petition for habeas 

relief filed herein on May 16, 1988 and are not properly before the 

court. Such issues can only be addressed in a separate action 

after exhaustion of state remedies. 

Accordingly, in that the State of Oklahoma has fully complied 

with the directives of this Court, this case is hereby DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this _ ___._l_v ___ day of March, 1991. 

Chief Judge, U. S. District Court 

Appellate Case: 91-5048 Document: 010110084254 Date Filed: 09/03/1991 Page: 3