Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-04275/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-04275-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

AGUSTIN ZARATE,

Plaintiff,

v.

PLAZA HOME MORTGAGE, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-04275-BLF 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Plaintiff filed this action on July 28, 2016, yet the docket does not indicate that he has 

served any of the Defendants. See No. 16-cv-4275. On December 2, 2016, the Court ordered 

Plaintiff Agustin Zarate to show cause in writing on or before January 3, 2017 why Defendants 

should not be dismissed from this action for failure to prosecute. Order to Show Cause re 

Dismissal & Vacating Case Mgmt. Conf. (“OSC”), ECF 9. The Court explained that failure to 

respond to the OSC in a timely manner would result in dismissal of the case. Id. Plaintiff has not 

responded to the OSC. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058, 1065 (9th Cir. 2004) (“The 

failure of the plaintiff eventually to respond to the court’s ultimatum . . . is properly met with the 

sanction of a Rule 41(b) dismissal.”). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2017

 ______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:16-cv-04275-BLF Document 11 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 1