Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06436/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06436-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS

MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION No. M 02-1486 PJH

_______________________________/

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ 

This Document Relates to: REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

State of New York v. Micron et al. 

(C 06-6436 PJH)

_______________________________/

Before the court is defendants’ request for leave to file a motion for reconsideration

in connection with this court’s August 31, 2007 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Defendants specifically seek leave to file a motion for

reconsideration of the portion of the order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s

claim under New York Executive Law § 63(12) as untimely. 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(d), the court hereby GRANTS defendants’ request

for leave to file a motion for reconsideration. The court furthermore treats defendants’

motion for leave to file reconsideration as its actual motion for reconsideration. Plaintiff is

hereby granted one week, until September 20, 2007, in which to file an opposition to

defendants’ motion for reconsideration, if so desired. Such opposition shall be no longer

than 10 pages in length. The court will thereafter take the matter under submission. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2007 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-06436-PJH Document 80 Filed 09/12/07 Page 1 of 1