Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00851/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00851-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOWARD SCOTT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0851 EFB P

vs.

M. MCDONALD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff’s consent. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

On April 7, 2011, the court found that plaintiff’s second amended complaint stated

potentially cognizable claims as to defendants defendants Sharrb, Cooper, Oateman, Nelson,

Medina, Betty, and Barron. The court further found that plaintiff had failed to state a cognizable

claim as to the remaining defendants and dismissed them with leave to amend. Plaintiff was

directed to submit the documents to effect service of the complaint on defendants Sharrb,

Cooper, Oateman, Nelson, Medina, Betty, and Barron or an amended complaint attempting to

state claims as to defendants McDonald, Stovall, Menina, Lopez, Kelly, Bowers, Hole, Klaso,

Case 2:09-cv-00851-MCE-EFB Document 38 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Crandle, Hoover, Hole, and Hislo within thirty days. Plaintiff was admonished that failure to

comply would result in dismissal of the action.

The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not submitted the materials necessary for

service on the above-listed defendants, has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise

responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110, 183(a).

DATED: May 20, 2011.

Case 2:09-cv-00851-MCE-EFB Document 38 Filed 05/23/11 Page 2 of 2