Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-00438/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-00438-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

ELGUINDY, MEYER & KOEGEL, APC

DAVID L. PRICE, State Bar Number 088696

dprice@emklawyers.com

BENJAMIN D. KOEGEL, State Bar Number 266308

bkoegel@emklawyers.com

W. PATRICK CRONICAN, State Bar Number 300645

pcronican@emklawyers.com

2990 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 205

Roseville, CA 95661

Telephone: (916) 778-3310

Facsimile: (916) 330-4433

Attorneys for Plaintiff INFINITY ENERGY, INC., 

a California Corporation

KROGH & DECKER, LLP

JASON G. ELDRED, State Bar Number 327148

jasoneldred@kroghdecker.com

555 Capitol Mall, Ste 700

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 498-9000

Facsimile: (916) 498-9005

Attorneys for Defendant PRESTIGE 

INVESTMENTS WORLDWIDE, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INFINITY ENERGY, INC., a California 

Corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PRESTIGE INVESTMENTS WORLDWIDE, 

LLC,

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:21-cv-00438-WBS-KJN

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; 

ORDER

JUDGE: Hon. William B. Shubb

MAG.: Hon. Kendall J. Newman

FILED: March 10, 2021

TRIAL: Not Set

/ / /

Case 2:21-cv-00438-WBS-KJN Document 6 Filed 04/13/21 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through the respective 

attorneys that Defendant PRESTIGE INVESTMENTS WORLDWIDE, LLC dba INFINITE 

ENERGY CONSTRUCTION may have additional time within which to answer or otherwise 

respond to Plaintiff’s complaint. Therefore, the last day to defendant to answer or otherwise 

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is May 3, 2021. This is the first extension of time requested for 

this matter.

Good cause exists for this extension as defense counsel has just been assigned to this case 

and requires time to become knowledgeable about the case to prepare an initial pleading. 

Furthermore, the parties are currently conferring on the proper naming of additional defendants.

This document is being electronically filed though the Court’s ECF system. In this regard, 

counsel for Defendant hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all 

persons required to sign the document; (2) Plaintiff’s counsel has concurred with the filing of this 

document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production if 

so ordered. 

Dated: April 12, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

ELGUINDY, MEYER & KOEGEL, APC

By: /s/ W. P. Cronican

David L. Price, Esq.

Benjamin D. Koegel, Esq. 

W. Patrick Cronican, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff INFINITY ENGERY, INC., a 

California Corporation

Dated: April 12, 2021 KROGH & DECKER, LLP

By: /s/ Jason G. Eldred

Jason G. Eldred, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant PRESTIGE INVESTMENTS 

WORLDWIDE, LLC dba INFINITE ENERGY 

CONSTRUCTION

Case 2:21-cv-00438-WBS-KJN Document 6 Filed 04/13/21 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant should answer or 

otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before May 3, 2021. 

Dated: April 13, 2021

Case 2:21-cv-00438-WBS-KJN Document 6 Filed 04/13/21 Page 3 of 3