Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01530/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01530-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTHUR LITTLEFIELD, JR., )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

)

OFFICER VIVEROS, et al., )

)

)

)

Defendants. )

 )

1:06cv1530 OWW DLB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Document 31)

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 5, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that

Defendant’s motion to dismiss be GRANTED. This Findings and Recommendation was served

on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of

the date of service of the order. After receiving an extension of time, Plaintiff filed objections on

February 25, 2008. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s

objections, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and

proper analysis. 

Case 1:06-cv-01530-OWW -DLB Document 35 Filed 03/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued December 5, 2007, is ADOPTED IN

FULL; and

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss be GRANTED and the action is DISMISSED. 

This terminates this action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 29, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01530-OWW -DLB Document 35 Filed 03/04/08 Page 2 of 2