Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00035/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00035-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUGENE KORTE,

Plaintiff,

v.

MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-00035 JAM KJN (PS)

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed November 14, 2013, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days 

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. ECF No. 15. The thirty day period has now 

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.1

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

 

1

Plaintiff filed a notice of interlocutory appeal and a motion to proceed on appeal in forma 

pauperis on December 3, 2013. In an order denying as moot plaintiff’s motion to proceed on 

appeal in forma pauperis, the undersigned cautioned plaintiff that the filing of his interlocutory 

appeal does not stay this action and plaintiff is required to timely file an amended complaint. 

ECF No. 19.

Case 2:13-cv-00035-JAM-KJN Document 21 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: December 23, 2013

kort0035.fta

Case 2:13-cv-00035-JAM-KJN Document 21 Filed 12/23/13 Page 2 of 2