Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01087/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01087-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

No. CV 10 1087 JW HRL

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP 

David M. Balabanian (SBN 37368) 

david.balabanian@bingham.com 

Charlene S. Shimada (SBN 91407) 

charlene.shimada@bingham.com 

Lucy Wang (SBN 257771) 

lucy.wang@bingham.com 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 

Telephone: 415.393.2000 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LINC Housing Corporation, Corporate Fund for 

Housing, LINC Franciscan Limited Partnership, 

Franciscan Park, LLC, Hunter Johnson and Franciscan 

Housing Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

FRANCISCAN RESIDENT ADVISORY 

COMMITTEE, (formerly known as 

FRANCISCAN MOBILE HOME OWNERS 

FOR JUSTICE); ROSENDO QUINIQUINI; 

RORY MORDINOIA; ROBERT QUINN; 

SANDRA HOLMAN; and MAMIE ZHU, And 

on behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LINC HOUSING CORPORATION; 

CORPORATE FUND FOR HOUSING; LINC 

FRANCISCAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; 

FRANCISCAN PARK, LLC; HUNTER 

JOHNSON; FRANCISCAN HOUSING 

CORPORATION; RICHARD BERGER; DALY 

CITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE 

AGENCY; PACIFIC WEST MANAGEMENT; 

FRANCISCAN ACQUISITION 

CORPORATION; DAVID KENYON; and 

DOES 1-50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. CV 10 1087 JW HRL 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AND SETTING 

BRIEFING AND HEARING 

SCHEDULE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge James Ware

8/25/2010

Case 5:10-cv-01087-JW Document 52 Filed 08/25/10 Page 1 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

No. CV 10 1087 JW HRL

WHEREAS, on March 15, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint for Damages, Restitution, 

Injunctive Relief, Dissolution of Corporation [and] Specific Performance (“Complaint”) (Docket 

# 1); 

WHEREAS, on July 22, 2010 Defendants LINC Housing Corporation, Corporate Fund 

for Housing, LINC Franciscan Limited Partnership, Franciscan Park, LLC, Hunter Johnson, 

Franciscan Housing Corporation, Richard Berger, Daly City Housing Development Finance 

Agency and Pacific West Management filed and/or joined in motions to dismiss the Complaint 

(Docket ## 30, 34-35, 37); 

WHEREAS, on August 11, 2010, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order continuing 

the initial Case Management Conference and related deadlines until after the Court ruled on the 

pending motions to dismiss (Docket # 43); 

WHEREAS, on August 12, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint for 

Damages, Restitution, Injunctive Relief, Dissolution of Corporation [and] Specific Performance 

(“First Amended Complaint”) (Docket # 46); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to extend the time for the undersigned defendants 

(collectively, “Defendants”) to move or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to, 

and including, September 29, 2010, or such later time as Plaintiffs may have agreed, or might 

hereafter agree, with any party; 

WHEREAS, in order to avoid unnecessary legal expenses and in the interests of justice 

and judicial economy, the parties have agreed that Defendants will limit any motion(s) to dismiss 

the First Amended Complaint to challenging claims that serve as Plaintiffs’ basis for asserting 

federal subject matter jurisdiction. The parties further agree that if the Court denies Defendants’ 

motion(s) to dismiss or if the Court grants Defendants’ motion(s) but asserts supplemental 

jurisdiction over remaining claims, Defendants have the right to move to dismiss any remaining 

claims within thirty days of the Court’s order. The parties also agree that if the Court denies all 

of Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss, Defendants will have thirty days from the Court’s order to 

answer the First Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, the parties believe that an initial Case Management Conference is premature 

Case 5:10-cv-01087-JW Document 52 Filed 08/25/10 Page 2 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

No. CV 10 1087 JW HRL

at this stage of the litigation and should be continued until the Court has ruled on all of the 

Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss the First Amended Complaint; 

THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby 

agree and stipulate to the following: 

1. Defendants shall move or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint on 

or before September 29, 2010. Defendants shall limit any motion(s) to dismiss 

the First Amended Complaint to challenging claims that serve as Plaintiffs’ basis 

for asserting federal subject matter jurisdiction. 

2. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition(s) to any motion(s) to dismiss the First 

Amended Complaint on or before November 12, 2010. 

3. Defendants shall file any reply brief(s) on or before December 15, 2010. 

4. The hearing on any motion(s) to dismiss the First Amended Complaint shall be 

set for January 17, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court may hear 

the matter. 

5. If the Court denies Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss or if the Court grants 

Defendants’ motion(s) but asserts supplemental jurisdiction over remaining 

claims, Defendants have the right to move to dismiss any remaining claims within 

thirty days of the Court’s order. 

6. If the Court denies all of Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss, Defendants will have 

thirty days from the Court’s order to answer the First Amended Complaint. 

7. The initial Case Management Conference and all deadlines set forth in the Court’s 

March 15, 2010, Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR 

deadline (Docket #3) shall be continued until a date that is convenient for the 

Court after the Court has ruled on all of Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss the First 

Amended Complaint, including the deadlines for the parties to meet and confer 

regarding ADR process selection and filing an ADR Certification, and the 

deadlines for associated pre-conference filings, including the Case Management 

Statement, Rule 26(f) Report and Initial Disclosures. 

February 2, 2011

The Court vacates the case management conference currently set for September 27, 

2010 at 10:00 AM. The Court will set a new conference date in its Order 

addressing Defendants’Motions. 

Case 5:10-cv-01087-JW Document 52 Filed 08/25/10 Page 3 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

No. CV 10 1087 JW HRL

By entering into this Stipulation, Defendants reserve and do not waive any arguments and 

defenses they may possess, including, without limitation, whether the Court lacks personal 

jurisdiction over any of them. 

DATED: August 17, 2010 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP 

David M. Balabanian 

Charlene S. Shimada 

Lucy Wang 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415.393.2000 

Facsimile: 415.393.2286 

By: /s/ Charlene S. Shimada 

Charlene S. Shimada 

Attorneys for Defendants LINC Housing 

Corporation, Corporate Fund for Housing, LINC 

Franciscan Limited Partnership, Franciscan Park, 

LLC, Hunter Johnson and Franciscan Housing 

Corporation 

DATED: August 19, 2010 SHELLEY S. BUCHANAN 

Attorney at Law 

912 Cole Street, PMB #120 

San Francisco, CA 94117 

Telephone: 415.566.3526 

Facsimile: 415.566.3548 

By: /s/ Shelley S. Buchanan 

Shelley S. Buchanan 

Attorney for Franciscan Mobile Home Owners for 

Justice, Rosendo Quiniquini, Rory Mordinoia, 

Robert Quinn, Sandra Holman and Mamie Zhu 

DATED: August 19, 2010 ANDREW W. COUCH 

Lawyer 

110 Newport Center Dr., Suite 200 

Newport Beach, CA 92660 

Telephone: 949.760.2596 

Facsimile: 949.760.0337 

By: /s/ Andrew W. Couch 

Andrew W. Couch 

Attorney for Pacific West Management 

Case 5:10-cv-01087-JW Document 52 Filed 08/25/10 Page 4 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

No. CV 10 1087 JW HRL

DATED: August 17, 2010 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

George A. Yuhas 

405 Howard Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: 415.773.5700 

Facsimile: 415.773.5759 

By: /s/ George A. Yuhas 

George A. Yuhas 

Attorney for Daly City Housing Development 

Finance Agency and Richard Berger 

Case 5:10-cv-01087-JW Document 52 Filed 08/25/10 Page 5 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 5 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

No. CV 10 1087 JW HRL

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Based on the above stipulation of the Parties and for good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _____________________________________ 

 Hon. James Ware 

 United States District Judge 

 AS MODIFED. 

August 25, 2010 

Case 5:10-cv-01087-JW Document 52 Filed 08/25/10 Page 6 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 6 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

No. CV 10 1087 JW HRL

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 

I, Charlene S. Shimada, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from any signatories indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed 

document. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed this 19th day of August, 2010, at San Francisco, California. 

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP 

By: /s/ Charlene S. Shimada 

Charlene S. Shimada 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415.393.2000 

Facsimile: 415.393.2286 

Attorneys for Defendants LINC Housing 

Corporation, Corporate Fund for Housing, LINC 

Franciscan Limited Partnership, Franciscan Park, 

LLC, Hunter Johnson, Franciscan Housing 

Corporation and Richard Berger in his capacity as 

former director of LINC Housing Corporation and 

officer of the Franciscan Housing Corporation 

Case 5:10-cv-01087-JW Document 52 Filed 08/25/10 Page 7 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 7 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

AND SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

No. CV 10 1087 JW HRL

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I hereby certify that on August 19, 2010, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice 

of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants on record. 

By: /s/ Diane R. Imai 

Diane R. Imai 

 

Case 5:10-cv-01087-JW Document 52 Filed 08/25/10 Page 8 of 8