Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-mc-80274/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-mc-80274-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: THE SUBPOENA FOR LESTER 

WALLACE, ESQ. TO TESTIFY IN A 

CIVIL ACTION AND FOR LESTER 

WALLACE, ESQ. TO PRODUCE 

DOCUMENTS

Movant.

Case No. 19-mc-80274-JCS

 19-mc-80275-JCS 

 19-mc-80276-JCS 

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO 

QUASH AS MOOT

IN RE: THE SUBPOENA FOR 

IMPERIUM PATENT WORKS LLP TO 

PRODUCE DOCUMENTS

Movant.

IN RE: THE SUBPOENA FOR DARIEN 

WALLACE, ESQ. TO TESTIFY IN A 

CIVIL ACTION AND FOR DARIEN 

WALLACE, ESQ. TO PRODUCE 

DOCUMENTS

Movant.

On November 4, 2019, counsel for Cap Export, LLC and Abraham Amouyal emailed Mr. 

Lester Wallace two subpoenas, one for Mr. Lester Wallace and one for Imperium Patent Works. 

On that same day, counsel for Cap Export, LLC and Abraham Amouyal also emailed a subpoena 

to Mr. Darien Wallace. On November 8, 2019, Mr. Lester Wallace filed two separate 

miscellaneous matters, case numbers 19-mc-80274-JCS and 19-mc-80275-JCS, seeking to quash 

the subpoenas. On November 12, 2019, Mr. Darien Wallace likewise filed a miscellaneous 

matter, case number 19-mc-80276-JCS, seeking to quash the subpoena he received. 

Case 3:19-mc-80274-JCS Document 9 Filed 12/04/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Court concludes that this matter is suitable 

for decision without a hearing. In the oppositions filed in response to the three motions to quash, 

the issuing parties, Cap Export, LLC and Abraham Amouyal, indicated that they have withdrawn 

the subpoenas at issue. Furthermore, the issuing parties attached correspondence they had sent to 

the responding parties notifying the responding parties that the issuing parties did not seek to 

enforce the deposition subpoenas that are the subject of these pending three quash motions. 

Therefore, the three motions to quash filed in case numbers 19-mc-80274-JCS, 19-mc-80275-JCS, 

and 19-mc-80276-JCS are DENIED as moot, with each side to bear their own attorneys’ fees and 

costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 4, 2019

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:19-mc-80274-JCS Document 9 Filed 12/04/19 Page 2 of 2