Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02815/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02815-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MODESTA JACINTO,

Plaintiff,

v.

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-02815-MMC 

SECOND ORDER DIRECTING 

PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS 

COPIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL 

LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S 

STANDING ORDERS

On December 16, 2016, plaintiff electronically filed her opposition to defendant’s 

motion to dismiss her first amended complaint and her request for judicial notice in 

support of said opposition. Plaintiff has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and 

the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of 

each document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-

1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. 

Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with the Civil Local Rules of this District 

and the Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the 

above-referenced documents.

The Court has previously advised plaintiff of her failure to comply with the Civil 

Local Rules of this District and the Court’s Standing Orders in connection with earlier-filed 

documents. (See Order, filed November 28, 2016.) Such reminder appears to have had 

little to no effect on compelling compliance therewith.

Parties are expected to comply with court rules without repeated reminders. 

Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby advised that the Court will impose sanctions, including, but 

Case 3:16-cv-02815-MMC Document 63 Filed 12/22/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

not limited to, striking from the record any further electronically filed document for which a 

chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 22, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-02815-MMC Document 63 Filed 12/22/16 Page 2 of 2