Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-mc-00255/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-mc-00255-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 999
Nature of Suit: 
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiff, MISC. S-02-0255 LKK PAN PS

vs.

LEONORA ROTAR, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

__________________________________/

On September 11, 2002, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

Case 2:02-mc-00255-LKK -PAN Document 3 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed September 11, 2002, are

ADOPTED; and

2. This matter is summarily remanded to Placer County Superior Court. See 28

U.S.C. § 1446(c)(4).

DATED: July 6, 2006.

_______________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

rotar255.jo

Case 2:02-mc-00255-LKK -PAN Document 3 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2