Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05789/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05789-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-05789-JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DONALD W. CARLSON (Bar No.: 79258/Email: dcarlson@ccplaw.com)

ROBERT M. PETERSON (Bar No.: 100084/Email: rpeterson@ccplaw.com)

ERIC K. IWASAKI (Bar No.: 256664/Email: eiwasaki@ccplaw.com) 

CARLSON, CALLADINE & PETERSON LLP

353 Sacramento Street, 16th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 391-3911

Facsimile: (415) 391-3898

Attorneys for Counter-claimants 

VASQUEZ ESTRADA & CONWAY LLP, 

MICHAEL A. VASQUEZ, MICHAEL J. ESTRADA 

AND PATRICIA KANTOR CONWAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WESTPORT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION, A MISSOURI 

CORPORATION,

 Plaintiff,

v.

VASQUEZ ESTRADA & CONWAY 

LLP AND DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

VASQUEZ ESTRADA & CONWAY 

LLP, MICHAEL A. VASQUEZ, 

MICHAEL J. ESTRADA AND 

PATRICIA KANTOR CONWAY,

 Counter-claimants,

 v.

WESTPORT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION, A MISSOURI 

CORPORATION, SWISS RE 

CORPORATE SOLUTIONS 

AMERICAS HOLDING 

CORPORATION, A DELAWARE 

CORPORATION, AND DOES 1-10,

 Counter-defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-05789-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS

Complaint Filed: December 17, 2015

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Case 3:15-cv-05789-JST Document 52 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 3
 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-05789-JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have 

reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge 

is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must 

participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead 

file a Notice of need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR 

L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

Private ADR (please identify process and provider): Private Mediation. 

The parties will exchange lists of five proposed mediators in the San Francisco area.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the 

order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

other requested deadline ____________________________________

Dated: 3/10/2016 /s/ Robert M. Peterson 

Attorney for Counter-Claimants

Dated: 3/10/2016 /s/ Matthew P. Kanny 

Attorney for Counter-Defendants

Case 3:15-cv-05789-JST Document 52 Filed 03/11/16 Page 2 of 3
 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-05789-JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________ 

JUDGE JON S. TIGAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

X

March 11, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:15-cv-05789-JST Document 52 Filed 03/11/16 Page 3 of 3