Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04115/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04115-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Margarita Gaeta, et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

 v.

Perrigo Pharmaceuticals Company et al.,

Defendant(s).

 /

NO. C 05-04115 JW 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

RULE 15(a) UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT; DENYING

MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT

Plaintiffs Augustine Gaeta, individually, and Margarita Gaeta, individually and as Guardian

ad litem for A.G., a minor child, seeks leave to amend Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint to join

new parties, to eliminate certain claims, and to make other minor typographical changes. The

motion was noticed for hearing on March 13, 2006. Defendant Perrigo Pharmaceuticals Company

has stipulated to the filing of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. See Defendant’s Reply filed

January 24, 2006. 

The Court finds it appropriate to take this matter under submission for decision on the basis

of the papers filed by the parties, without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 7-6. Based upon all

papers filed to date and the stipulation of the parties, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for

Leave to File Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 15(a). Plaintiffs shall file and serve the Second Amended Complaint no later than March

13, 2006.

Case 5:05-cv-04115-JW Document 28 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Further, Defendant’s motion to strike is denied as moot.

Dated: February 27, 2006

05cv4115sac

/s/James Ware 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-04115-JW Document 28 Filed 02/28/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

James Conner Barber lojcb@aol.com

Kenneth C. Ward kcward@archernorris.com

Michael F. Healy michael.healy@sdma.com

Randall Penner penner.bradley@sbcglobal.net

Rebecca Marie Biernat Rebecca.Biernat@sdma.com

Judith B. Anderson

Archer Norris

2033 North Main Street, Suite 800

P. O. Box 8035

Walnut Creek, Ca 94596-3728

Rhonda R. Bartlett

4310 Gaston Avenue

Dallas, TX 75246

Dated: Feb. 28, 2006 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By:_/s/JW Chambers________

Melissa Peralta

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:05-cv-04115-JW Document 28 Filed 02/28/06 Page 3 of 3