Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03843/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03843-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE 

FOR PARTIES’ EXCHANGE OF DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS 

CASE NO. CV-04-03843 RMW (HRL) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

1530 PAGE MILL ROAD 

PALO ALTO, CA 94304 

TEL: 650.856.3700 

FAX: 650.856.3710 

NANCY J. GEEENEN (CA BAR NO. 135968) 

EILEEN R. RIDLEY (CA BAR NO. 151735) 

DAVID B. MOYER (CA BAR NO. 197739) 

KIMBERLY K. DODD (CA BAR NO. 235109) 

NGEENEN@FOLEY.COM

ERIDLEY@FOLEY.COM

DMOYER@FOLEY.COM

KDODD@FOLEY.COM

ATTORNEYS FOR COUNTERDEFENDANT, SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MEMRY CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

KENTUCKY OIL TECHNOLOGY, N.V., 

PETER BESSELINK, MEMORY METALS 

HOLLAND, B.V., 

 Defendants. 

 CASE NO. CV-04-03843 RMW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR 

PARTIES’ EXCHANGE OF 

DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS 

KENTUCKY OIL TECHNOLOGY, N.V., 

 Counterclaimant, 

 v. 

MEMRY CORPORATION and 

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY 

CORPORATION, 

 Counterclaim Defendants. 

 

NO HEARING REQUESTED

PRETRIAL CONF: NOVEMBER 1, 2007 

TRIAL: NOVEMBER 19, 2007 

THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE

*E-FILED - 10/18/07*

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 753 Filed 10/18/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE 

FOR PARTIES’ EXCHANGE OF DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS 

CASE NO. CV-04-03843 RMW (HRL) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Plaintiff and counter-defendant Memry Corporation (“Memry”), Defendants Kentucky 

Oil Technology, N.V., Peter Besselink, Memory Metals Holland, B.V. and counterclaimant 

Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V. (collectively “Kentucky Oil”) and counter-defendant 

Schlumberger Technology Corporation (“STC”), file this Stipulation and Proposed Order to 

extend the time for the parties to exchange demonstrative exhibits as set forth in the Court’s 

Standing Order Re: Pretrial Preparation, (the “Pretrial Preparation Order”). The parties 

completed their initial meet and confer on October 2, 2007 and discussed scheduling issues 

related to the pretrial filings. 

RECITALS

1. On May 25, 2007, the Court set the trial of this action for November 19, 

2007 and a Pretrial Conference for November 1, 2007. 

2. The Pretrial Preparation Order specifies that not less than ten court days 

before the Pretrial Conference, the parties shall exchange copies of proposed exhibits, schedules, 

and summaries and other items to be offered at trial together with a complete list of all such 

proposed exhibits. See paragraph B.8. of the Pretrial Preparation Order. 

3. The parties intend to exchange a list of those exhibits as required under the 

Pretrial Preparation Order. but will not be prepared to exchange any charts, schedules, 

summaries, diagrams or other materials that will be used as demonstratives at that time. Such 

demonstratives shall be exchanged six (6) calendar days before trial. The parties agree that any 

objection to such demonstratives shall be served and filed three (3) calendar days before trial. 

The parties will serve copies of all other exhibits as required by the Pretrial Preparation Order. 

4. Finally, the parties agreed that a party must serve a copy of any 

demonstrative at least 24 hours before it plans to use it at trial in the event that it has not been not 

previously disclosed. 

STIPULATION

Accordingly, the parties stipulate as follows: 

1. The parties incorporate the recitals set forth above. 

2. The parties shall exchange any charts, schedules, summaries, diagrams or 

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 753 Filed 10/18/07 Page 2 of 3
2 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE 

FOR PARTIES’ EXCHANGE OF DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS 

CASE NO. CV-04-03843 RMW (HRL) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

other materials that will be used as demonstratives not less than six (6) calendar days before trial. 

Objections to such demonstratives shall be served and filed three (3) calendar days before trial. 

3. If a party seeks to use any other demonstrative during trial, that party shall 

serve the demonstrative on all other parties at least 24 hours before it is used. 

DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2007 Cantor Colburn 

 William J. Cass 

Attorneys for Memry Corporation 

DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2007 Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps LLP 

 Michael H. Bierman 

Attorneys for Kentucky Oil Technology, NV 

Peter Besselink and Memory Metals Holland 

B.V. 

DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2007 Foley & Lardner LLP 

 Nancy J. Geenen 

Attorneys for Schlumberger Technology 

Corporation. 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 Ronald M. Whyte 

Judge, United States District Court 

10/18/07

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 753 Filed 10/18/07 Page 3 of 3