Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-02306/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-02306-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Javon Tamar Williams, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

State of Arizona, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV 13-2306-PHX-RCB (MHB) 

 O R D E R 

On November 12, 2013, Plaintiff Javon Tamar Williams, who was confined in the 

Maricopa County Fourth Avenue Jail, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint and an 

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff named as Defendants the State of 

Arizona, the United States Department of Treasury, the Securities and Exchange 

Commission and NATO. 

On November 22, 2013, the Court’s Notice of Assignment was returned to the 

Court as undeliverable and with a notation that Plaintiff was no longer in custody. 

Plaintiff did not file a notice of change of address, contrary to the instructions on the 

Court’s prisoner complaint form, which state that a plaintiff must immediately notify the 

Court and the defendants in writing of any change in mailing address or the case may be 

dismissed. In an Order dated January 13, 2014, the Court dismissed the Complaint 

without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for 

failure to prosecute, and the Clerk of Court entered Judgment that same day.1

 

 

1

 On January 16, 2014, after the Court dismissed his case and entered Judgment, 

Case 2:13-cv-02306-RCB--MHB Document 51 Filed 02/24/14 Page 1 of 6
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

On January 17, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Re-Open Case, which he amended 

on January 21, 2014 (Doc. 14).2

 Plaintiff has filed numerous Motions and exhibits since 

January 21, 2014, many of which are incomprehensible, including: a “Motion to Produce 

Royalty Mathematical Ebonics UPC Barcode 0700112804304” (Doc. 21); another 

Motion to Re-Open Case Number 2:2013CV02306-PHX-RCB-MHB (Doc. 22); a 

“Motion to Warrant Claim of OMB Control Number to Derivative World Bank” (Doc. 

24); a “Motion to Pay a Commodity Amount to the World Bank for the Forecast of 

Budget For Danielson Publ[is]hing 38-3687154 Ethanol Corn” (Doc. 27); a “Motion to 

Pay a Commodity Amount to the World Bank for the Forecast of Budget for Danielson 

Publ[is]hing 38-3687143 Titanium” (Doc. 28); a “Motion to Pay a Commodity Amount 

to the World Bank for the Forecast of Budget for Danielson Publ[is]hing 38-3687154 

Gold” (Doc. 29); a “Motion to Pay a Commodity Amount to the World Bank for the 

Forecast of Budget for Danielson Publ[is]hing 38-3687154 Lumber” (Doc. 30); a 

“Motion to Grant Naval Motorcycle and Fleet Vessel Program Under Compliance with 

Federal Regulations of the New Start Program : Business Section as Propr[ie]tor Ship in 

the 502 Fund. [infrastructure]” (Doc. 35); a “Motion to Subrogate Ham Radio Line – as 

Lifeline Through a FCC Registration Number” (Doc. 36); a “Motion to Card General 

Ledger Line Line [sic] of Credit to USDOTNE” (Doc. 37); a “Motion to Relief 

[Indigent]: To Proceed with Aid Federal Bond Program to Claim Loss of Property in 

Accordance with Tax & Probate Code 3-916 to Credit Work Tax” (Doc. 41); a “Motion 

to Re-Open Court Arbitration Proceeding” (Doc. 42); a “Motion ORDER physician to 

Scientific Progress NOTE” (Doc. 43); a “Motion to Audit Possible Liquid Asset Value of 

Real Estate Trust Holder” (Doc. 44); a “Motion to Introduce: Police Report” (Doc. 46); a 

 Plaintiff filed a Notice of Change of Address. On January 22, 2014, the Clerk of Court 

re-mailed the Court’s January 13, 2014 Order and Judgment to the new mailing address provided by Plaintiff, and the documents were returned to the Court on January 27, 2014 as “unable to forward.” 

2

 Plaintiff’s Motion to Re-Open Case and Amended Motion were filed under seal 

because Plaintiff included what appeared to be a social security number. The portions of the Amended Motion quoted herein have redacted the apparent social security number. 

Case 2:13-cv-02306-RCB--MHB Document 51 Filed 02/24/14 Page 2 of 6
- 3 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

“Motion to Order to IANA for Scientific sequence Identification Code for Section (K) 

Docket # 010111 All Vaginal Porn Terms and Agreement”. (Doc. 47); a “Motion for 

Judgement [sic] for Relief to Proceed” (Doc. 48); “Motion to Warran[]t Claim for OMB 

Control Number to Derivative World Bank" (Doc. 49); and a “Motion to Subrogate 

Communication Subrogate [Ham Radio Line]” (Doc. 50). 

The Court will deny the Motion to Re-Open and all other motions, to the extent 

any relief is requested in them. 

I. Amended Motion to Re-Open 

 Plaintiff states the following in his Amended Motion to Re-Open: 

On or about November 10, 2013 the case was filed in the U.S. District 

Court in this matter[.] Mr. Williams was subsequently re-arrested on 

November 19, 2013 for frivolous violation and released on December 15, 

2013 where parole is not terminated Duress has included an Identity issue 

of non-issuance due to a non-birth state right being infringed on and all 

monies interference to this matter being stopped for that issue alone then a 

police harassment note in the [P]hoenix Police department over an issue of 

police profiling has been noted. With food and accommodation needs not 

being satisfied under bank infrastructure and the Sheriff having a part in the 

property destruction of identification on now two separate occasions and a 

consistent interruption of a rfid known as Brainwave of [redacted apparent 

social security numbers] which can be backed scientifically I have had a 

difficult time in self-representation coupled with the entire community 

sharing profile with me due to the entertainment industry and the Plaintiff 

Javon Tamar Williams being Principal for a Public announcement 

Company known as Danielson Publishing these interruptions have given 

the people an advanced view point on a subject the Commander-in-Chief 

has stated in previous public announcement as “NO LEAKS”. I have also 

tried to Subrogate the initial vehicle for the courts to have a balance view 

on the liability of the Agency and the Original vehicle owner with the 

Intelligence Quotient of 164 being used “at will” of the social community 

causing it to according to definition of Webster’s dictionary influencing a 

nation, age place time or era to a variable. This further backs the Motion to 

Seal and give a valid point to all the points of authority initially assigned by 

Power of Attorney initially put into action as a protection order and as 

agent of this order Officer of a Peace of a social community in itself. 

 Plaintiff concludes: “For good case [sic] with regard to the courts Javon Tamar 

Williams the Petitioner that the courts re-open this case so that all subpoena and 

Case 2:13-cv-02306-RCB--MHB Document 51 Filed 02/24/14 Page 3 of 6
- 4 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

summons and complaints can be utilized properly for a fair trial and Justice can be served 

for the Plaintiff and/or Defendant in this case.” 

 Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Re-Open is denied. Plaintiff has not presented any 

discernible or cognizable basis for reopening this case. Moreover, if the Court were 

inclined to reopen this case, which it is not, Plaintiff would need to pay the $350.00 filing 

fee or show cause why he could not pay. That is because a plaintiff who brings a civil 

action while a prisoner is required to pay the full amount of the filing fee even if he is 

subsequently released. See Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002) 

(“Under the [Prison Litigation Reform Act], all prisoners who file [in forma pauperis] 

civil actions must pay the full amount of the filing fee.”) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)). 

 Further, if the Court did reopen this case, Plaintiff’s Complaint would be 

dismissed without leave to amend because it is frivolous. For example, the allegations in 

in Count I begin: “The right to have juris [sic] in a separate but equal holding community 

of the same accomplished value throug[h] work effort under Title 14 where said plaintiff 

has confidential information as fiduciary to no breach maritime law to another holding 

facility under Bank Infrastructure Residence Washington D.C. (TX form copyright 

September 2000)[.]” Plaintiff alleges that he has been injured by “power of authority 

used against oneself instead of in behalf of a beneficial kinetic energy (force) 

[indiscernible] as state union of highest capacity (base) of a pent.” For relief, Plaintiff 

seeks “judge signature, notary and order to produce 100,000 surety bond and open 

investigation as associated fee for all justice in lieu of document delivery for all possible 

law enforcement expense en route to United States Department of Treasury Washington, 

District of Columbia as domain with adequate proper surveillance visual: land, sea, air 

with the Corporation of America sublet numerical sequence 38-2687154 Danielson 

Publishing (est. 2003) capabilities to control point of origin that exists in three 

dimensional form all associated I-9, Nameline: Javan/Javon Tamar Williams 

DANIELSON PUBLISHING and THE 911 LLP as agent(s) Corporation of America.” 

This is not a cognizable request for relief. 

Case 2:13-cv-02306-RCB--MHB Document 51 Filed 02/24/14 Page 4 of 6
- 5 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Although pro se complaints are to be construed liberally by the court, see Boag v. 

McDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint filed 

by a plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis “at any time the court determines” that the 

complaint is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). A complaint is frivolous and warrants dismissal 

when the claim “lacks an arguable basis in law or fact.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 

319 (1989); Jackson v. State of Arizona, 885 F.2d 639 (9th Cir. 1989). But a court may 

not dismiss a complaint simply because the court finds plaintiff’s allegations unlikely. 

Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992) (to justify dismissal as factually 

frivolous, allegations must rise to the level of “fanciful,” “fantastic” and “delusional”). A 

complaint lacks an arguable basis in law or fact if it contains factual allegations that are 

fantastic or delusional, or if it is based on legal theories that are indisputably without 

merit. Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 327-28. The Court finds that Plaintiff’s allegations are 

delusional, fanciful, irrational, and wholly incredible and lack any arguable basis in law 

or fact. Thus, his Complaint would be dismissed if this case were reopened. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

(1) Plaintiff’s Amended Motion to Re-Open Case (Doc. 14) is denied.

(2) To the extent any relief is requested therein, the following motions are 

denied: “Motion to Produce Royalty Mathematical Ebonics UPC Barcode 

0700112804304” (Doc. 21); Motion to Re-Open Case Number 2:2013CV02306-PHXRCB-MHB (Doc. 22); “Motion to Warrant Claim of OMB Control Number to Derivative 

World Bank” (Doc. 24); “Motion to Pay a Commodity Amount to the World Bank for the 

Forecast of Budget For Danielson Publ[is]hing 38-3687154 Ethanol Corn” (Doc. 27); 

“Motion to Pay a Commodity Amount to the World Bank for the Forecast of Budget for 

Danielson Publ[is]hing 38-3687143 Titanium” (Doc. 28); “Motion to Pay a Commodity 

Amount to the World Bank for the Forecast of Budget for Danielson Publ[is]hing 38-

3687154 Gold” (Doc. 29); “Motion to Pay a Commodity Amount to the World Bank for 

the Forecast of Budget for Danielson Publ[is]hing 38-3687154 Lumber” (Doc. 30); 

Case 2:13-cv-02306-RCB--MHB Document 51 Filed 02/24/14 Page 5 of 6
- 6 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

“Motion to Grant Naval Motorcycle and Fleet Vessel Program Under Compliance with 

Federal Regulations of the New Start Program : Business Section as Propr[ie]tor Ship in 

the 502 Fund. [infrastructure]” (Doc. 35); “Motion to Subrogate Ham Radio Line – as 

Lifeline Through a FCC Registration Number” (Doc. 36); “Motion to Card General 

Ledger Line Line of Credit to USDOTNE” (Doc. 37); “Motion to Relief [Indigent]: To 

Proceed with Aid Federal Bond Program to Claim Loss of Property in Accordance with 

Tax & Probate Code 3-916 to Credit Work Tax” (Doc. 41); “Motion to Re-Open Court 

Arbitration Proceeding” (Doc. 42); “Motion ORDER physician to Scientific Progress 

NOTE” (Doc. 43); “Motion to Audit Possible Liquid Asset Value of Real Estate Trust 

Holder” (Doc. 44); “Motion to Introduce: Police Report” (Doc. 46); “Motion to Order to 

IANA for Scientific Sequence Identification Code for Section (K) Docket # 010111 All 

Vaginal Porn Terms and Agreement”. (Doc. 47); “Motion for Judgement [sic] for Relief 

to Proceed” (Doc. 48); “Motion to Warran[]t Claim for OMB Control Number to 

Derivative World Bank” (Doc. 49); and “Motion to Subrogate Communication Subrogate 

[Ham Radio Line]” (Doc. 50). 

(3) The docket shall reflect that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), that any appeal of 

this decision would not be taken in good faith. 

DATED this 24th day of February, 2014. 

Case 2:13-cv-02306-RCB--MHB Document 51 Filed 02/24/14 Page 6 of 6