Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00569/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00569-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 385
Nature of Suit: Property Damage - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TO INCREASE

PAGE LIMITS

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00569-LB

720962492.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK LUCIDO, et al, on behalf of himself

and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NESTLÉ PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, a

Missouri corporation; and DOES 1 through 200,

inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:15-cv-00569-LB

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES:

1. SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

AND HEARING DATE FOR MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

2. INCREASING PAGE LIMITS ON

BRIEFS IN CONNECTION WITH

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(modified)

Case 3:15-cv-00569-EMC Document 104 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 2
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TO INCREASE

PAGE LIMITS

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00569-LB

720962492.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Having received and reviewed the stipulation of Plaintiffs Frank Lucido, Almaceo

Campbell, Laurae Campbell, Karen Phillips, Wayne Colello, Ricky Bisharat, Hope Benham,

Robin Benham, Virginia Burgardt, Cynthia Zenakis, Diane Porter, Lance Carlson, Grace

Armstrong, Thomas Normand, Sharon Normand, Christina Winters, Robert Bryden, America

Pena, Elizabeth Rodarte, and Kacy Kimball (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendant Nestlé

Purina Petcare Company (“Purina”), the Court rules as follows:

1. Purina shall file its motion for summary judgment by August 25, 2016;

2. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Purina’s motion for summary judgment by

September 22, 2016;

3. Purina’s reply shall be filed by October 13, 2016;

4. The motion shall be noticed for a October 27, 2016 hearing date, or on such other date

and time that is convenient for the Court and its calendar;

5. Purina’s brief in support of its motion for summary judgment and Plaintiffs’ brief in

support of its opposition to the motion for summary judgment shall not exceed 35 pages;

6. Purina’s reply brief shall not exceed 20 pages.

7. If necessary, the parties shall be entitled to make a separate request for additional

pages .

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________, 2016

Edward M. Chen

Judge, U. S. District Court

Northern District of California

32 18 7/1

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00569-EMC Document 104 Filed 07/01/16 Page 2 of 2