Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-06-01656/USCOURTS-ca8-06-01656-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 

---

1

Michael J. Astrue has been appointed to serve as Commissioner of Social

Security and is substituted as the appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c)(2). 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-1656

___________

*

Fay Cragle Conner *

*

Plaintiff – Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

Michael J. Astrue,1

 Commissioner, * District of Arkansas.

Social Security Administration, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant – Appellee. *

*

*

___________

Submitted: February 16, 2007 

Filed: April 16, 2007

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 06-1656 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2007 Entry ID: 3299030
2

The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District

of Arkansas. 

-2-

Fay Cragle Conner appeals the district court's2

 affirmance of the

Commissioner's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and

supplemental security income. The administrative law judge found that although

Conner has hypertension, elevated liver enzymes and hypercholesterolmia, she has no

impairment, or combination of impairments, that results in more than a minimal effect

on her ability to perform basic work-related activities. The ALJ noted that no medical

evidence supported her complaints of pain in her back, neck and shoulders. The ALJ

concluded that she does not have a severe impairment, and is not disabled. The

Appeals Council denied review. Having carefully reviewed the record, this court

finds that the Commissioner's final decision is supported by substantial evidence on

the record as a whole. See Harris v. Barnhart, 356 F.3d 926, 928 (8th Cir. 2004)

(standard of review); Kelley v. Barnhart, 372 F.3d 958, 960 (8th Cir. 2004) (same).

Accordingly, as an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment is

affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

 

Appellate Case: 06-1656 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2007 Entry ID: 3299030