Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06269/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06269-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOE SALAS-SHARP

 (aka “Joe W. Modrell”),

Plaintiff,

vs.

California Department of

Corrections, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06269-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 11)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Joe Salas-Sharp (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding

pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 23, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which

contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within eleven (11) days. On

May 30, 2006, the United States Postal Service returned the order

served on Plaintiff. A notation on the envelope indicated:

Return to Sender - Unclaimed.

Case 1:04-cv-06269-OWW -SMS Document 15 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On June 6, 2006, the court issued an order reassigning this

action to Judge Oliver W. Wanger (OWW) for all further

proceedings due to the senior status of Judge Robert E. Coyle

(REC), thereby changing the case initials as captioned above. On

June 16, 2006, the United States Postal Service once again

returned the order served on Plaintiff. A notation on the

envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Deceased.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 23, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on Plaintiff’s failure

to obey the court’s order of April 6, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 6, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06269-OWW -SMS Document 15 Filed 08/07/06 Page 2 of 2