Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06598/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06598-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DORIS KING, et al, CASE NO. CV F 04-6598 LJO

Plaintiffs, ORDER TO DENY EXTENSION REQUEST

vs. (Doc. 58.)

FRESNO CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT

et al,

Defendants.

 /

This Court DENIES as untimely, procedurally defective and moot plaintiff Jeremy King’s

(“plaintiff’s”) request to respond to defendant City of Fresno’s summary judgment motion and motion

to strike complaint. See F.R.Civ.P. 6(b); Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation, 497 U.S. 871, 896, 110

S.Ct. 3177 (1990); North Umberland Mining Co. v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co., 193 F.2d 951 (9 Cir. 1952). th

Even on its merits, plaintiff’s request failsto substantiate an extension, especially given that the request

itself is untimely and its apparent absence of good faith. See Lujan, 497 U.S. at 896, 110 S.Ct. 3177;

McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1387 (11 Cir. 1981); In re Four Seasons Securities th

Laws Litigation, 493 F.2d 1288, 1290 (10 Cir. 1974). th

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 3, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06598-NEW Document 59 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 1