Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04327/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04327-53/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.

SECURITIES LITIGATION

___________________________________

THE NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES’

RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LISA C. BERRY,

Defendant. ___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 06-4327 JW (PVT)

Case No.: C 08-0246 JW (PVT)

INTERIM ORDER CONTINUING

HEARING ON LEAD PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT

ERNST & YOUNG, AND SOLICITING

ADDITIONAL BRIEFING

On November 12, 2009, Lead Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions against Defendant Ernst

& Young in In Re Juniper Networks, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. C 06-4327 JW. The

motion is currently set to be heard on February 2, 2010. Defendant Ernst & Young opposed the

motion. Having reviewed the papers submitted by the parties, the court finds it appropriate to issue

this interim order. Based on the moving, opposition and reply papers submitted,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Lead Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions against

Defendant Ernst & Young is CONTINUED to March 2, 2010 at 10AM. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than February 10, 2010, Lead Plaintiff shall file a

Case 5:06-cv-04327-JW Document 521 Filed 01/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

supplemental brief setting forth what specific documents it would have used in deposition or

propounded written discovery regarding if the documents had been timely produced, along with a

brief description of the line of questioning it would have pursued (with which deponent), or the

written discovery it would have propounded as to each such document. Defendants may file a

response to the Lead Plaintiff’s supplemental brief no later than February 24, 2010.

Dated: January 28, 2010

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:06-cv-04327-JW Document 521 Filed 01/28/10 Page 2 of 2