Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02311/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02311-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOSHE ISAAC STEIN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2311 RRB KJM P

vs.

SHASTA COUNTY BOARD OF

SUPERVISORS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed December 13, 2007, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed

and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. On February 1, 2008,

plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to file his second amended complaint. 

The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:06-cv-02311-JAM -KJM Document 19 Filed 04/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. lst, 951 F.2d

1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 4, 2008. 

1

stei2311.fta

Case 2:06-cv-02311-JAM -KJM Document 19 Filed 04/04/08 Page 2 of 2