Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05349/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05349-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW OBJECTION 

Case No. 06-05349 JCS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DLC LAW GROUP

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

Q. Huy Do (State Bar No. 184462) 

222 Kearny Street, 7th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel.: 415-433-1200 

Fax: 415-433-1211 

Email: huy.do@dlc-law.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff PAI CORPORATION, 

a Tennessee Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PAI CORPORATION, a Tennessee 

Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTEGRATED SCIENCE SOLUTIONS, INC., 

a California Corporation; CECELIA McCLOY, 

individually and doing business as, 

INTEGRATED SCIENCE SOLUTIONS, INC., 

a California corporation; DAVID C. DOBSON, 

individually and doing business as 

INTEGRATED SCIENCE SOLUTIONS, INC., 

a California corporation, 

Defendants. 

No. C 06-05349 JCS

STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW 

DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION TO 

NORMAN DUQUETTE 

INTEGRATED SCIENCE SOLUTIONS,

INC.,; 

Counterclaimant, 

v. 

PAI CORPORATION 

Counterdefendant. 

Case 3:06-cv-05349-JCS Document 114 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:06-cv-05349-JCS Document 117 Filed 03/27/08 Page 1 of 3
2 

STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW OBJECTION 

Case No. 06-05349 JCS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WHEREAS, Plaintiff informed Defendants of its retention of Norman Duquette as 

its damages expert on February 26, 2008; 

WHEREAS, Defendants filed an Objection to Norman Duquette on March 3, 2008 

(“Objection”); 

WHEREAS, the parties through their counsel have met and conferred to discuss the 

substance of the Defendants’ Objection; 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff PAI Corporation (“PAI”), defendant and counterclaimant 

Integrated Science Solutions Inc. (“ISSi”) and defendants Cecelia McCloy and David 

Dobson, through their respective counsel of record, (collectively referred to as “the Parties”) 

hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. Paragraph 7.4(a) of the Stipulated Protective Order is modified to provide as 

follows: “(5) identify each person or entity from whom the Expert has received 

compensation for significant work in his or her areas of expertise or to whom the expert has 

provided professional services at any time during the preceding five years[.]” 

2. For a period of two years after the conclusion of this litigation, the parties’ 

respective damages experts (Mr. Everett Harry and Mr. Norman Duquette) 

a. will not perform any services involving PAI’s OSHIMES contract 

with NASA or the PAI-ISSi subcontract thereunder; 

b. will not assist PAI or ISSi in the preparation of any proposal to be 

submitted to NASA as a prime contractor or any lower tier subcontractor; 

c. will not assist in the preparation of a proposal or participate in any 

way in any competition where it is known or there is reason to know that any party to this 

litigation will be a competitor, subcontractor or team member. 

3. Notwithstanding the parties’ agreement in paragraph 2, the parties agree that 

Mr. Norman Duquette is not precluded from performing litigation services for PAI in 

this litigation, including such work as is required for him to prepare a rebuttal to the damages 

Case 3:06-cv-05349-JCS Document 114 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:06-cv-05349-JCS Document 117 Filed 03/27/08 Page 2 of 3
3 

STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW OBJECTION 

Case No. 06-05349 JCS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

report prepared by Mr. Everett Harry. The parties further agree that Mr. Duquette is limited 

to his role as a damages expert in the pending case, and that no information, data or analysis 

prepared by Mr. Duquette for this litigation is to be used for any other purpose by either of 

the parties. 

4. Breach of the terms of this Stipulation may result in irreparable harm to 

either party and thus may be addressed by injunctive relief. The parties consent to the 

continuing jurisdiction of this court for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Stipulation. 

5. Defendants agree to withdraw, and hereby withdraw, the Objection to 

Norman Duquette. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

 March 20, 2008 /s/ 

Date Q.Huy Do 

 DLC LAW GROUP, APLC 

 Attorneys for PAI Corporation 

 March 20, 2008 /s/ 

 Date Patricia A. Meagher 

Rossi & Meagher LLP 

Attorneys for ISSi, McCloy and Dobson 

 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: March ____, 2008 ____________________________________ 

Joseph C. Spero 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05349-JCS Document 114 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 3 of 3

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:06-cv-05349-JCS Document 117 Filed 03/27/08 Page 3 of 3