Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00065/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00065-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:405 Fair Housing Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD PRICE, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-02-0065 LKK KJM

vs.

CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff’s motion to compel further response to interrogatory from defendant

Stockton Redevelopment Agency and motion to compel further production of documents from

defendant City of Stockton came on regularly for hearing May 11, 2005. Kristin Burrows and

Jack Daniel appeared for plaintiff. James Diamond appeared for defendants. Upon review of the

documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause

appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. No later than May 18, 2005, defendant Stockton Redevelopment Agency shall

provide a supplemental response indicating whether the owner(s) of any land identified in the

“Multi-Modal” project participated in formulating, or by supporting, a proposed project, and if

so, the identity of such owner(s). No later than May 20, 2005, plaintiff shall notify the court

whether the motion to compel further response from defendant Stockton Redevelopment Agency

Case 2:02-cv-00065-LKK -KJM Document 269 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

is withdrawn.

2. Based on the supplemental responses to request nos. 28 and 128, which

defendant’s counsel represented during the hearing have been verified, as well as the

representation of counsel that no written proposed or final contracts exist between the law firm of

Goldfarb and Lipman and Pacific Relocation Consultants relating to services on behalf of the

City of Stockton, the motion to compel further production of documents from defendant City of

Stockton is denied. 

3. This matter was reassigned to the undersigned. The parties are reminded that

all documents filed with the court must bear the correct case number: CIV S-02-0065 LKK

KJM. Failure to submit documents with the correct case number results in misrouting and delay

in receipt of the documents by chambers.

DATED: May 13, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

price.oah 

Case 2:02-cv-00065-LKK -KJM Document 269 Filed 05/16/05 Page 2 of 2