Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02009/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02009-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRELL CROCKETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-2009-PJH 

ORDER RE SERVICE

As the court advised plaintiff at the December 3, 2015 case management

conference, he must, within 30 days, file with the court a proof of service showing that 

defendant Coca-Cola Enterprises has been served with process. 

The court has reviewed the docket for this case and it appears that the clerk did 

not issue a summons at the time the complaint was filed. Accordingly, in order to 

effectuate proper service on Coca-Cola, plaintiff must arrange for issuance of a summons 

by the clerk, and both the complaint and the summons must be properly served on CocaCola, and the proof of service filed within 30 days. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 4, 2015

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cv-02009-PJH Document 22 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 1