Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05136/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05136-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

STEVEN J. HAYS PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-5136

THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, 

CALIFORNIA, Superior Court,

Eureka Division; et al. DEFENDANTS

O R D E R

Now on this 7 day of September, 2006, comes on for th

consideration the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation

(Doc. 4) herein and the Plaintiffs’ Objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5).

The Court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and

sufficiently advised, finds that the plaintiff’s objections offer

neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and

Recommendation and the same should be, and it hereby is, adopted in

toto. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report And Recommendation of

the Magistrate Judge is adopted in toto and the plaintiff’s

complaint is DISMISSED on the grounds that the claims are frivolous

and fail to state claims upon which relief can be granted. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/Jimm Larry Hendren

HON. JIMM LARRY HENDREN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-05136-JLH Document 6 Filed 09/07/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>