Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_05-cv-00554/USCOURTS-almd-2_05-cv-00554-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

The court notes that any § 2254 petition filed by the petitioner is likewise subject to the one-year period of

limitation contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Moreover, the court finds that there are no circumstances present in this

case which “would entitle [petitioner] in the interest of justice to transfer [pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631] or stay . . .

because the limitations period had already expired before he filed” the instant habeas action. Guenther v. Holt, 173 F.3d

1328, 1330-1331 (11th Cir. 1999).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MARSHALL VAN REED, #167850, )

)

Petitioner, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:05cv554-F

)

RALPH HOOKS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

O R D E R

On June 15, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #7) in this

case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file

in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is 

ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation is adopted;

2. That the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Marshall Van

Reed on April 13, 2005 is DENIED.

3. That this cause of action is DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28

U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) as the petitioner has failed to obtain the requisite order from the

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive habeas

application.1

Case 2:05-cv-00554-MEF-VPM Document 8 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 2
Done this the 27th day of July 2005.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00554-MEF-VPM Document 8 Filed 07/27/05 Page 2 of 2