Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02365/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02365-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John R. Quain, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Clear Channel Communications, Inc.;

KYOT Radio; and Russ Egan, Program

Director, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-2365-PHX-DGC

ORDER

Plaintiff is a member of the musical group Citizen Quain. He has been unable to get

his music played on local radio stations. He filed a pro se complaint against Defendants on

November 12, 2009. Dkt. #1. In response to the Court’s order (Dkt. #21) granting

Defendants’ motion for a more definite statement (Dkt. #11), Plaintiff filed an amended

complaint on March 18, 2010 (Dkt. #24).

On April 1, 2010, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. #25. Plaintiff has filed no response, and the time

for doing so has expired. See LRCiv 7.2(c); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). Plaintiff shall have until

May 14, 2010 to file response to the motion to dismiss.

Rule 7.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure provides that an unrepresented party’s

failure to respond to a motion “may be deemed a consent to the . . . granting of the motion

and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily.” LRCiv 7.2(i). Plaintiff is advised that

if he does not file a response to the motion to dismiss (Dkt. #25) by May 14, 2010, the Court

Case 2:09-cv-02365-DGC Document 26 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

will summarily grant the motion. Plaintiff is warned for a second time (see Dkt. #21 at 3)

that if he fails to prosecute this action, or if he fails to comply with the rules or any Court

order, the Court may dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff shall have until May 14, 2010 to file a response to Defendants’

motion to dismiss (Dkt. #25).

2. The Court will summarily grant the motion to dismiss if Plaintiff fails to

comply with this order.

DATED this 29th day of April, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02365-DGC Document 26 Filed 04/29/10 Page 2 of 2