Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05784/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05784-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARIUS MOSTOWFI, et al,

Plaintiffs,

v

I2 TELECOM INTERNATIONAL INC, et

al,

Defendants. /

No C-03-5784 VRW

ORDER

On October 10, 2005, plaintiffs sought leave of the court

to exceed the 25-page limit set under Civ LR 7-4(b), and filed an

82-page opposition to the defendants’ various motions to dismiss. 

Doc #176-1. The court DENIES plaintiffs’ request for leave to

exceed the page limit. By November 16, 2005, plaintiffs must file

a new opposition to the motions to dismiss that does not exceed 25

pages. If defendants so choose, they may file a supplemental reply

to this new opposition by November 30, 2005. The hearing will

still be held as scheduled on December 15, 2005, at 2:00 PM.

//

//

Case 3:03-cv-05784-VRW Document 200 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:03-cv-05784-VRW Document 200 Filed 11/08/05 Page 2 of 2