Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05084/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05084-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[Proposed] Order Defs.’ Admin. Mot. Remove ECF No. 60-1 From Case Dkt. (C 13-05084-HSG (PR))

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SENARBLE CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

W. STRUFFERT, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C 13-05084-HSG (PR)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO REMOVE ECF NO. 60-1

FROM CASE DOCKET

On March 10, 2015, this Court issued a protective order barring further use of Plaintiff’s

November 17, 2014 deposition transcript. (Order Addressing Pending Mots. 1-3, ECF No. 52.)

Plaintiff was deposed for a second time and, on June 19, 2015, Defendants’ D. McGuirt,

J. Phillips, and W. Struffert filed their Motion for Summary Judgment, intending to rely on

testimony from Plaintiff’s second deposition. (See Decl. Ellis Supp. Defs.’ Not. Mot. & Mot.

Summ. J. 1-2, ECF No. 60). Plaintiff filed an oversized joint opposition to Defendants’ motion

and cross-motion for summary judgment on October 20, 2015, and Defendants were granted an

extension to prepare a reply and opposition. (See Pl.’s Mot. Opp. Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J. & CrossMot. Summ. J., ECF No. 83; Defs.’ Mot. Exten. Time File Reply & Opp. Pl’s Cross-Mot. Summ.

J., ECF No. 84; Order Granting Defs.’ Mot. Exten. Time File Reply & Opp. Pl’s Cross-Mot.

Summ. J. 1, ECF No. 89.)

Case 4:13-cv-05084-HSG Document 102 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[Proposed] Order Defs.’ Admin. Mot. Remove ECF No. 60-1 From Case Dkt. (C 13-05084-HSG (PR))

On December 10, 2015, Defendants discovered that they had inadvertently filed excerpts of

the protected November 17, 2014 deposition transcript. Defendants promptly filed a notice of

errata containing admissible deposition testimony as well as an administrative motion for an order

removing the erroneously filed protected material from the case docket.

The Court has read and considered Defendants’ motion as well as the accompanying

declaration of counsel, and finds good cause exists to grant the request. Accordingly,

Defendants’ administrative motion to remove ECF No. 60-1 from the docket is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED

Dated: ___________________________ __________________________

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

12/18/2015

Case 4:13-cv-05084-HSG Document 102 Filed 12/18/15 Page 2 of 2