Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01786/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01786-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOM FISHER,

Plaintiff,

v. CIV. NO. S-02-1786 LKK/DAD

TEAM PLAYER'S, INC.;

JENNIFER PENDERGAST,

individually and doing

business as the CORNER

POCKET; ENGELBRECHT

COMMERCIAL ENTERPREISE,

LLC; and DOES 1-25, Inclusive,

Defendants.

 /

TOM FISHER,

Plaintiff,

v. CIV. NO. S-06-2371 GEB/GGH

ENGELBRECHT COMMERCIAL RELATED CASE ORDER

ENTERPRISES, LLC; KEN L.

RIDINO, individually and 

dba DINO'S BILLIARDS,

GRILL, AND SPORTSBAR; and

DOES 1-25, Inclusive,

Defendants.

 /

Case 2:02-cv-01786-LKK -DAD Document 86 Filed 11/07/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has received the Notice of Related Cases filed

November 1, 2006. Examination of the above-entitled actions

reveals that both actions are related within the meaning of Local

Rule 83-123(a), E.D. Cal. (1997). The actions involve some of the

same parties, and are based on the same or similar claims, the same

property, transaction or event, similar questions of fact and the

same question of law.

Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge

and magistrate judge is likely to effect a substantial savings of

judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the

parties.

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under

Local Rule 83-123 merely has the result that the two (2) actions

are assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no

consolidation of the actions is effected. Under the regular

practice of this court, related cases are generally assigned to the

judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was

assigned.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated CIV. NO.

S-06-2371 GEB/GGH be, and the same hereby is, reassigned to Judge

Lawrence K. Karlton and Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for all

further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned

case only are hereby VACATED.

The parties are referred to the attached Order Setting Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference. Henceforth, the caption on

documents filed in this reassigned case shall be shown as CIV. NO.

Case 2:02-cv-01786-LKK -DAD Document 86 Filed 11/07/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

S-06-2371 LKK/DAD. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make

appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to

compensate for this reassignment.

DATED: November 6, 2006.

Case 2:02-cv-01786-LKK -DAD Document 86 Filed 11/07/06 Page 3 of 3