Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00836/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00836-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN DANIEL BLYMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

DANIEL PARAMO, Warden,

Respondent.

No. 1:14-cv-00836-DAD-SKO HC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(Doc. 39)

Petitioner Stephen Daniel Blyman is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of 

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 1, 2016, this Court lifted the order of stay 

and abeyance in the above-captioned case and directed Petitioner to file an amended petition 

including the newly exhausted claims by July 29, 2016. Although the time provided for the filing 

of the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus has now passed, Petitioner has failed to file an 

amended petition.

The Court has discretion to impose any and all sanctions authorized by statute or rule or 

within the inherent power of the Court, including dismissing the action, based on a petitioner’s 

failure to comply with a court order. F.R.Civ.P. 11; Local R. 110.

Accordingly, the Court hereby orders that:

1. Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Petitioner 

shall file a written response to the Court, showing cause why the petition should not be 

Case 1:14-cv-00836-DAD-SKO Document 40 Filed 08/10/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

dismissed for Petitioner’s failure to obey the Court’s order filed June 1, 2015. Submission 

of the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus within the fifteen-day-period shall be 

deemed compliance with this requirement.

2. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this order to Petitioner’s address, 

along with a copy of the Court’s June 1, 2016, order (Doc. 39).

3. Petitioner’s failure to comply with this order to show cause will result in a 

recommendation that the Court dismiss this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00836-DAD-SKO Document 40 Filed 08/10/16 Page 2 of 2