Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03081/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03081-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07725.0171/8084297.1

61222919.1 3:15-CV-03081-RS

Joint Addendum to Stipulated Protective Order; [Proposed] Order

DAVID C. VEIS (SBN 83135) 

dveis@robinskaplan.com

LAURA P. NASH (SBN 136619) 

lnash@robinskaplan.com

ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 

2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3283

Telephone: (310) 552-0130

Facsimile: (310) 229-5800 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Zurich American Insurance Company & 

Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CORELOGIC, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

 Case No. 3:15-CV-03081-RS 

JOINT ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR STANDARD 

LITIGATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg 

Case 3:15-cv-03081-RS Document 32 Filed 07/14/16 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07725.0171/8084297.1

61222919.1 3:15-CV-03081-RS

Joint Addendum to Stipulated Protective Order; [Proposed] Order

Plaintiffs CoreLogic, Inc.; CoreLogic Default Information Services, LLC; and CoreLogic 

Solutions LLC (collectively, “CoreLogic”); defendants Zurich American Insurance Company 

(“ZAIC”) and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (“F&D”) (collectively, “Defendants”); 

and subpoenaed third party Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) stipulate to this addendum to 

the Stipulated Protective Order for Standard Litigation, entered by this Court on January 5, 2016, 

Docket No. [26], (hereinafter, the “SPO”). Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same 

definitions as in the SPO. 

On May 18, 2016, F&D issued a subpoena to third party Wells Fargo requesting 

documents in 36 different categories in connection with the above-referenced lawsuit between 

CoreLogic and Defendants. In compliance with the subpoena, Wells Fargo is currently in the 

process of researching its files for responsive documents. 

Wells Fargo’s research indicates that all or most responsive documents are confidential in 

nature and will qualify as Protected Material under the SPO. Specifically, they pertain to Wells 

Fargo’s internal business practices and decision-making processes, and/or they contain sensitive 

consumer financial information. 

Paragraph 9(a) on page 10 of the parties’ SPO provides in pertinent part that “[n]othing in 

these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional 

protections.” In accordance with this provision, CoreLogic, Defendants, and Wells Fargo hereby 

agree to the following additional protections for the documents Wells Fargo intends to produce in 

compliance with F&D’s subpoena: 

1. For all Protected Material produced by Wells Fargo, Wells Fargo stipulates that the 

following persons may view these documents without obtaining additional permissions from 

Wells Fargo: 

 a. Outside Counsel of Record for Defendants and CoreLogic, as well as 

employees of the said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose 

the information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to 

Be Bound” that is attached to the SPO as Exhibit A; 

Case 3:15-cv-03081-RS Document 32 Filed 07/14/16 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07725.0171/8084297.1

61222919.1

2 3:15-CV-03081-RS

Joint Addendum to Stipulated Protective Order; [Proposed] Order

 b. the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) for 

Defendants and CoreLogic to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who 

have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached to the SPO as 

Exhibit A;

c. the Court and its personnel; 

d. court reporters and their staff to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary 

for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” that 

is attached to the SPO as Exhibit A. 

 e. Experts (as defined by the SPO) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary 

for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” that 

is attached to the SPO as Exhibit A. 

f. During their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" 

(Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of 

transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be 

separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted 

under this Stipulated Protective Order.

g. the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a 

custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 

2. Other than the categories of persons set forth in Paragraph 1 above, Protected 

Material produced by Wells Fargo shall not be disclosed without advance written notice from the 

party seeking to disclose Protected Material to Wells Fargo or its counsel, provided however, that 

CoreLogic and Defendants shall give to counsel for Wells Fargo five (5) days’ written notice by email and telephone call of any intention to utilize a “Confidential” document in a deposition and 

identify the person who will be deposed. Notice to Elizabeth Holt Andrews of Severson & 

Werson PC at eha@severson.com and 415.677.5596 shall constitute notice to Wells Fargo. 

3. The provisions of Paragraph 8 of the SPO are hereby modified as follows, with 

respect to Wells Fargo’s Protected Material only. If Defendants or CoreLogic desire to use or 

Case 3:15-cv-03081-RS Document 32 Filed 07/14/16 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07725.0171/8084297.1

61222919.1 3 3:15-CV-03081-RS

Joint Addendum to Stipulated Protective Order; [Proposed] Order

produce in other litigation Protected Material produced by Wells Fargo in this case, or is served 

with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of Protected 

Material produced by Wells Fargo in this case, that Party must: 

 a. promptly notify Wells Fargo’s counsel in writing, including if applicable a 

copy of the subpoena or court order; 

 b. if applicable, promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena 

or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or 

order is subject to the SPO and this Addendum. Such notification shall include a copy of the SPO 

and this Addendum; and 

 c. cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by 

Wells Fargo with respect to its Protected Material. 

If Wells Fargo timely seeks a protective order in the other litigation, neither Defendants 

nor CoreLogic shall produce or otherwise put in the public record any information designated 

“CONFIDENTIAL” by Wells Fargo in this action, before the protective order is ruled upon by the 

relevant court, unless Wells Fargo or its counsel has provided written permission to do so. Wells 

Fargo shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential 

material—and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging 

Defendants or CoreLogic to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 

4. All protections for Non-Parties in this litigation, as listed in Paragraph 9 of the 

SPO, shall apply to Wells Fargo, with the modification that the 14-day period in Paragraph 9(c) 

shall be extended to 30 days for Wells Fargo. 

5. Should Defendants or CoreLogic choose to make a motion to file more than 25 

pages of Wells Fargo’s Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e), in 

order to give Wells Fargo the maximum possible time to comply with its obligations as a 

Designating Party under Civil L.R. 79-5(e)(1)–(2), the moving Party shall notify undersigned 

counsel for Wells Fargo of its intentions as early as possible prior to the filing of the sealing 

motion, and in any event no later than 7 days prior to moving to seal. Otherwise, the provisions 

of Civil Local Rule 79-5 shall apply. 

Case 3:15-cv-03081-RS Document 32 Filed 07/14/16 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07725.0171/8084297.1

61222919.1

4 3:15-CV-03081-RS

Joint Addendum to Stipulated Protective Order; [Proposed] Order

6. Except as provided herein, all remaining protections in the SPO shall remain in full 

force and effect, and shall be construed to protect CoreLogic, Defendants, and Wells Fargo in 

equal measure. 

DATED: July 7, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 

By: /s/ David C. Veis 

 David C. Veis 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Zurich American Insurance Company & 

Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland 

DATED: July 7, 2016 REED SMITH LLP 

By: /s/ Ashley L. Shively 

 Ashley L. Shively 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

CoreLogic Inc.; CoreLogic Default Information 

Services, LLC; & Corelogic Solutions LLC 

DATED: July 7, 2016 

SEVERSON & WERSON 

A Professional Corporation 

By: /s/Elizabeth Holt Andrews 

 Elizabeth Holt Andrews 

Attorneys for Third Party 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 

Case 3:15-cv-03081-RS Document 32 Filed 07/14/16 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07725.0171/8084297.1

61222919.1 5 3:15-CV-03081-RS

Joint Addendum to Stipulated Protective Order; [Proposed] Order

ECF CERTIFICATION 

The filing attorney attests that he has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this 

document from the signatories to this document. 

Dated: July 7, 2016 By: /s/ David C. Veis 

 David C. Veis 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 The Honorable Richard Seeborg 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

7/14/16

Case 3:15-cv-03081-RS Document 32 Filed 07/14/16 Page 6 of 6