Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04311/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04311-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:16-cv-04311-RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

BENJAMIN J. HORWICH (State Bar No. 249090)

ben.horwich@mto.com

JOHN F. MULLER (State Bar No. 300839)

john.muller@mto.com

DAVID J. FEDER (State Bar No. 302112)

david.feder@mto.com

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

560 Mission Street

Twenty-Seventh Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 512-4000

Facsimile: (415) 512-4077

Attorneys for Plaintiff BNSF Railway Company

RAYMOND A. ATKINS (admitted pro hac vice)

ratkins@sidley.com

REBECCA K. WOOD (admitted pro hac vice)

rwood@sidley.com

HANNA M. CHOUEST (admitted pro hac vice)

hchouest@sidley.com

TOBIAS S. LOSS-EATON (admitted pro hac vice)

tlosseaton@sidley.com

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

1501 K Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20005

Telephone: (202) 736-8000

Facsimile: (202) 736-8711

Attorneys for Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company

(additional counsel listed on signature page)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and UNION 

PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF 

EQUALIZATION, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 3:16-cv-04311-RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

BRIEFING AND HEARING ON 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND 

RELATED MATTERS

Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg

Place: Courtroom 3, 450 Golden Gate Ave., 

San Francisco, California

Case 3:16-cv-04311-RS Document 29 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- Case No. 3:16-cv-04311-RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

1. The following briefing and hearing schedule shall apply to Plaintiffs’ Motion for a 

Preliminary Injunction:

Deadline for Defendants’ Opposition: September 13, 2016

Deadline for Plaintiffs’ Reply: September 20, 2016

Hearing on motion for preliminary injunction: ___________, 2016 at _____

2. No notice the Board of Equalization may send pursuant to Cal. Code Regs. tit. 19, 

§ 2704(a), see also Cal. Gov’t Code § 8574.32(b)(1), shall direct railroads operating in California 

to collect the SB 84 charge earlier than November 13, 2016.

3. Defendants’ obligation to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is stayed 

until 40 days after the Court’s decision on Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.

4. All discovery-related obligations and disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 are 

stayed until further order of this Court.

DATED: 

By:

Hon. Richard Seeborg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

October 13 1:30 pm

8/18/16

Case 3:16-cv-04311-RS Document 29 Filed 08/18/16 Page 2 of 2