Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00833/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00833-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700076112v1 - 1 - STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Case No. C-05-0833 (RS) 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

JOSEPH R. TIFFANY II #67821 

joseph.tiffany@pillsburylaw.com

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1114 

Telephone: (650) 233-4500 

Facsimile: (650) 233-4545 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

SHARON L. O’Grady #102356 

sharon.ogrady@pillsburylaw.com

50 Fremont Street, Fifth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 983-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

CBR SYSTEMS, INC. 

 

ROPES & GRAY LLP 

MARK D. ROWLAND #157862 

Mark.Rowland@ropesgray.com

GABRIELLE E. HIGGINS #163179 

525 University Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Tel: (650) 617-4000 

Attorneyes for Defendants 

VIACELL, INC. and VIACORD, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CBR SYSTEMS, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

VIACELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

and VIACORD, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

E-Filing

No. C-05-0833 (RS) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL

No Trial Date Set

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

)

)

)

*E-FILED 3/31/06*

Case 5:05-cv-00833-RS Document 40 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700076112v1 - 2 - STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Case No. C-05-0833 (RS) 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and their 

Confidential Settlement Agreement dated October 27, 2005, plaintiff and counterdefendant 

CBR SYSTEMS, INC. (“Plaintiff”) and defendants and counterclaimants VIACELL, INC., 

and VIACORD, INC. (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice. 

2. Defendants’ counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice. 

3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for purposes of resolving 

any disputes or controversies arising from or related to the Confidential Settlement 

Agreement. 

4. Each party shall bear its own attorney’ fees and costs incurred in connection 

with this action. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 

Dated: March 31, 2006. By /s/ 

 SHARON O’GRADY #102356 

 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

 CBR SYSTEMS, INC. 

Dated: March 31, 2006. By /s/ 

MARK D. ROWLAND #157862 

ROPES & GRAY LLP 

 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

 VIACELL, INC. and VIACORD, INC. 

Case 5:05-cv-00833-RS Document 40 Filed 03/31/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700076112v1 - 3 - STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Case No. C-05-0833 (RS) 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for Defendants and 

Counterclaimants VIACELL, INC., and VIACORD, INC. 

 By /s/ 

 SHARON O’GRADY 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

 CBR SYSTEMS, INC. 

Case 5:05-cv-00833-RS Document 40 Filed 03/31/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700076112v1 - 4 - STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Case No. C-05-0833 (RS) 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________, 2006 

 The Honorable Richard Seeborg 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

March 31

Case 5:05-cv-00833-RS Document 40 Filed 03/31/06 Page 4 of 4