Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03658/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03658-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Vanessa W. Vallarta, City Attorney #142404 

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 

200 Lincoln Avenue 

Salinas, CA 93901 

Telephone: (831) 758-7256 

Facsimile: (831) 758-7257 

Vincent P. Hurley #111215 

Susan K. Blitch #187761 

Douglas F. Young #84531 

LAW OFFICES OF VINCENT P. HURLEY 

A Professional Corporation 

38 Seascape Village 

Aptos, California 95003 

Telephone: (831) 661-4800 

Facsimile: (831) 661-4804 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF SALINAS and SALINAS POLICE DEPARTMENT; 

SALINAS POLICE CHIEF DANIEL ORTEGA, MICHAEL DOMINICI, CRAIG 

FAIRBANKS, JAMES GODWIN, LEK LIVINGSTON, VALENTIN PAREDEZ, JUAN RUIZ, 

and TIM SIMPSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

BETTY LOU HESTON, individually, and 

ROBERT H. HESTON, individually and as the 

personal representatives of ROBERT C. 

HESTON, deceased, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

CITY OF SALINAS and SALINAS POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, SALINAS POLICE CHIEF 

DANIEL ORTEGA, SALINAS POLICE 

OFFICERS MICHAEL DOMINICI, CRAIG 

FAIRBANKS, JAMES GOODWIN, LEK 

LIVINGSTON, VALENTIN PAREDEZ, 

JUAN RUIZ AND TIM SIMPSON, TASER 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., and DOES 1 to 10, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C-05-03658 JW (RS) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE 

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN EXCESS 

OF 25 PAGES (Civil L.R. 7-4 and 7-10) 

[Proposed] Order Case No. C 05-03658 JW (RS) 

----------------

---------

Case 5:05-cv-03658-JW Document 54 Filed 12/13/06 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This matter comes before the court on Defendants’ ex parte application for leave to file a 

motion for summary judgment in excess of 25 pages. Upon consideration of the foregoing 

motion and with good cause having been shown by Defendants, it is by the Court hereby: 

ORDERED that Defendants’ motion be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; and it is 

further: 

ORDERED that Defendants’ are GRANTED leave to file a motion for summary 

judgment in excess of 25 page. The new limit will be 50 pages. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

The Honorable James Ware 

United States District Court Judge 

[Proposed] Order Case No. C 05-03658 JW (RS) 

December 13, 2006 ---------

Case 5:05-cv-03658-JW Document 54 Filed 12/13/06 Page 2 of 2