Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03932/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03932-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UKIAH AUTOMOTIVE INVESTMENTS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MITSUBISHI MOTORS OF NORTH

AMERICA, INC., et al.,

Defendants ___________________________________

MITSUBISHI MOTORS CREDIT OF

AMERICA, INC.,

Counterclaimant

 v.

UKIAH AUTOMOTIVE INVESTMENTS,

Counterdefendant ___________________________________

MITSUBISHI MOTORS CREDIT OF

AMERICA, INC.,

Cross-claimant

 v.

THOMAS COGLIANO,

Cross-defendant ___________________________________

UKIAH AUTOMOTIVE INVESTMENTS,

Counterclaimant, and

THOMAS COGLIANO,

Cross-claimant

 v.

MITSUBISHI MOTORS OF NORTH

AMERICA, INC., et al.

Counterdefendants and crossdefendants /

No. 04-3932 MMC 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION OF

PLAINTIFF AND CROSS-CLAIMANT TO

EXTEND TIME TO PRODUCE EXPERT

REPORTS

Case 3:04-cv-03932-MMC Document 193 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The hearing date of May 26, 2006 is hereby VACATED. As defendants point out, a

motion for relief pursuant to Rule 6(b) is deemed submitted the third court day following the

filing of the motion. See Civil L.R. 6(d).

2

Before the Court is the motion, filed April 18, 2006 on behalf of plaintiff Ukiah

Automotive Investments and cross-claimant Thomas Cogliano, to extend pursuant to Rule

6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure the deadline for said parties to produce expert

reports. Defendants have filed opposition. The Court, having considered the papers filed

in support of and in opposition to the motion, finds the moving parties have shown good

cause for an extension, although not of the length sought, and, accordingly, hereby

modifies the Case Scheduling Order, filed January 26, 2006, as follows:1

1. With respect to the issue of damages only, the deadline to exchange by email or

facsimile initial expert reports is extended from April 18, 2006 to June 20, 2006.

2. With respect to the issue of damages only, the deadline to exchange by email or

facsimile rebuttal expert reports is extended from May 9, 2006 to July 5, 2006.

3. With respect to damages experts only, the deadline to complete expert

depositions is extended from May 25, 2006 to July 18, 2006.

4. The deadline by which the parties shall participate in private mediation is

extended from July 21, 2006 to August 4, 2006.

5. In all other respects, the dates and deadlines set forth in the Case Scheduling

Order, as previously amended by order filed January 26, 2006, remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03932-MMC Document 193 Filed 05/03/06 Page 2 of 2