Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00456/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00456-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL MENDOZA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

WARDEN J. SOLIS, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CIV F 05-456 AWI WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION AND

REFERRING MATTER TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On February 12, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus for failure

to exhaust state remedies be DENIED. This Findings and Recommendation was served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be

filed within thirty (30) court days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have

passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the

Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Case 1:05-cv-00456-AWI -WMW Document 18 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued February 12, 2007, is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; 

3. Respondent is to respond to the petition on the merits not later than thirty (30)

days after service of this order; and

4. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 21, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00456-AWI -WMW Document 18 Filed 03/22/07 Page 2 of 2