Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_19-cv-08203/USCOURTS-cand-5_19-cv-08203-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRETT LAWRENCE ADLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 19-08203 EJD (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On December 17, 2019, Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a motion 

which the Court construed as a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff 

also filed a motion for leave to proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP). (Docket No. 2.) On the 

same day, the Clerk sent Plaintiff a notice that the IFP application was deficient and he 

needed to submit a Certificate of Funds in Prisoner’s Account as well as a prisoner trust 

account statement showing transactions for the last six months within twenty-eight days or 

face dismissal of the action. (Docket No. 3 .) On December 31, 2019, the notice sent to 

Plaintiff was returned to the Court as undeliverable because Plaintiff was no longer in 

custody. (Docket No. 5.) To date, Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a new address 

and has had no further communication with the Court.

Case 5:19-cv-08203-EJD Document 8 Filed 03/09/20 Page 1 of 2
Order of Dismissal

PRO-SE\EJD\CR.19\8203Adler_dis-LR3

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11, a party proceeding pro se must 

promptly file a notice of change of address while an action is pending. See L.R. 3-11(a). 

The Court may, without prejudice, dismiss a complaint when: (1) mail directed to the pro 

se party by the Court has been returned to the Court as not deliverable, and (2) the Court 

fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written communication from the pro se

party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b). 

More than sixty days have passed since the mail addressed to Plaintiff was returned 

as undeliverable. The Court has not received a notice from Plaintiff regarding a new 

address. Accordingly, the instant civil rights action is DISMISSED without prejudice 

pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the Northern District Local Rules. 

The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________________ ________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

3/9/2020

Case 5:19-cv-08203-EJD Document 8 Filed 03/09/20 Page 2 of 2