Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00710/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00710-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

KATHERINE ELIZABETH PAIZ; LUIS

ALBERTO GONZALEZ,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-00710 WHA

ORDER REQUIRING

SUBMISSION OF JOINT

PROPOSED JURY

INSTRUCTIONS AND PROPOSED

SPECIAL VERDICT FORM

By 5:00 P.M. on FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2007, the parties will please submit

the following:

1. A joint set of proposed instructions on substantive issues of law arranged in a

logical sequence. If undisputed, an instruction shall be identified as “Stipulated Instruction No.

____ Re ___________,” with the blanks filled in as appropriate. If disputed, each version of the

instruction shall be inserted together, back to back, in their logical place in the overall sequence.

Each such disputed instruction shall be identified as, for example, “Disputed Instruction

No. ____ Re ____________ Offered by _________________,” with the blanks filled in as

appropriate. All disputed versions of the same basic topic shall bear the same number. 

Citations with pin cites are required, even if the instruction is by stipulation. Any modifications

to a form instruction must be plainly identified. If a party does not have a counter-version and

simply contends no such instruction in any version should be given, then that party should so

state (and explain why) on a separate page inserted in lieu of an alternate version. You need not

Case 3:06-cv-00710-MJJ Document 33 Filed 09/11/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\WHAALL\2006Crm\06-0710 Gonzalez Paiz\order requiring submission of joint proposed jury instructions.wpd 2

provide any preliminary instructions, general instructions or concluding instructions, all of

which the Court will do on its own in a draft for comment.

2. A separate memorandum of law in support of each party’s disputed instructions,

organized by instruction number. Please quote exactly (without ellipses) controlling passages

from the authorities and give pin cites.

3. A joint special verdict form with the questions (as few as possible) arranged in a

logical sequence. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 11, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00710-MJJ Document 33 Filed 09/11/07 Page 2 of 2