Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01550/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01550-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

-1-

STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

David A. Fike (#95325)

FIKE & BORANIAN 

401 Clovis Avenue, Suite 208

Clovis, California 93612

Telephone: (559) 229-2200

Facsimile: (559) 225-5504

Attorneys for Defendants

City of Mendota, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA- FRESNO DIVISION

EDWARD WARKENTINE, an individual; 

and DANIEL TANKERSLEY, an individual,

 Plaintiffs,

vs.

HECTOR J. SORIA; DANIEL

GOSSERAND; JOHNNY A. LEMUS; 

HECTOR LIZARRAGA; KRISTAL 

CHOJNACKI; GERRY GALVIN; 

FRANCISCO AMADOR; JOSEPH R. 

AMADOR; LEO CAPUCHINO; JOHN 

FLORES; ROBERT SILVA; CITY OF 

MENDOTA; JOSEPH RIOFRIO; BRYCE 

ATKINS; KORINA ZAMORA; MARTIN 

HERNANDEZ; SMITTY’S TOWING & 

AUTO DISMANTLING; ABRAHAM 

GONZALEZ; FELIPE GONZALEZ; 

GONZALEZ TOWING & TIRE SHOP

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:13-CV-01550-MJS

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties hereto that scheduling 

conflicts require a brief extension of the discovery deadlines, and, therefore, the Scheduling 

Order filed herein on July 14, 2014 shall be amended as follows: 

1. The non-expert and expert discovery deadlines shall both be extended to 

coincide on May 26, 2015;

2. All non-dispositive motions including any discovery motions shall be filed no

later than May 26, 2015;

3. All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than June 2, 2015, and 

heard not later than July 14, 2015.

Case 1:13-cv-01550-MJS Document 75 Filed 03/31/15 Page 1 of 2
-2-

STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. The undersigned counsel for defendants has made several attempts over the past

week to contact the two pro per Gonzalez defendants by telephone and by e-mail in order to 

ascertain whether they have any objection to the proposed amendment, however, there has been 

no response whatsoever by either Abraham Gonzalez or Felipe Gonzalez. 

Dated: March 27, 2014 FIKE & BORANIAN

/s/ David A. Fike___________________

David A. Fike, Attorneys for Defendants

City of Mendota, et al.

ROBERTSON, JOHNSON, MILLER & 

WILLIAMSON

/s/ G. David Robertson_________________

G. David Robertson, Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER

Good cause appearing the terms of the above STIPULATION AMENDING SCHEDULING 

ORDER in Case No. 1:13-CV-01550-MJS are accepted and adopted as the Order of the Court.

However, the parties are encouraged to set dispositive motions for hearing earlier than July 

14, 2015, to increase the likelihood same can be resolved before the Pretrial Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31, 2015 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01550-MJS Document 75 Filed 03/31/15 Page 2 of 2