Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00381/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00381-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY ANDRE LACY, 1:07-cv-00381-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

vs. (Doc. 128.)

H. TYSON, et al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION

OF PARTIES

(Doc. 92.)

Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT

 R. REYNA FROM THIS ACTION,

WITH PREJUDICE 

_____________________________/

Gary Andre Lacy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On September 20, 2012, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

Plaintiff's motion for substitution of parties, filed on November 30, 2011, be denied, and defendant

R. Reyna be dismissed from this action, with prejudice. On October 25, 2012, Plaintiff filed

objections to the findings and recommendations. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

1

Case 1:07-cv-00381-LJO-EPG Document 132 Filed 11/05/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

including Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by

the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 20,

2012, are ADOPTED in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for substitution of parties, filed on November 30, 2011, is DENIED;

3. Defendant R. Reyna is DISMISSED from this action, with prejudice; and

4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to reflect the dismissal of defendant R. Reyna on the Court's

docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 4, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:07-cv-00381-LJO-EPG Document 132 Filed 11/05/12 Page 2 of 2