Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01233/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01233-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

R

o

p

e rs M

a j e s ki K

o

h

n

&

B

e

n tl e

y

A Professional Corporation

San Francisco

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SF/196774.1/PJZ - 1 - 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER THERETO; 

CASE NO. 2-06-CV-1233 MCE GGH PS

GEORGE G. WEICKHARDT (SBN 58586) 

PAMELA J. ZANGER (SBN 168350) 

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY, PC 

201 Spear Street, Suite 1000 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 543-4800 

Facsimile: (415) 972-6301 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CHASE BANK USA, N.A., 

sued herein erroneously as CHASE MANHATTAN 

BANK USA, N.A.

Joseph E. Gerber 

P. O. Box 3222 

Carmichael, California 95609 

Telephone: (561) 828-8049 

Plaintiff In Pro Per

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSEPH E. GERBER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A., a 

Delaware corporation, MANN BRACKEN, 

LLC, Georgia limited liability company; 

MIOGA BANNISTER, an individual or the 

alias of an individual; SHANTELE LEWIS, an 

individual or the alias of an individual; 

CAPITAL RECOVERY SERVICE, LLC, a 

Virginia limited liability company; VIKING 

COLLECTION SERVICE SOUTHWEST, 

INC., an Arizona corporation; and, LIZ 

FRENCH, an individual or the alias of an 

individual, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2-06-CV-1233 MCE GGH PS 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

AND ORDER THERETO 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:06-cv-01233-MCE -GGH Document 12 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 3
R

o

p

e rs M

a j e s ki K

o

h

n

&

B

e

n tl e

y

A Professional Corporation

San Francisco

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SF/196774.1/PJZ - 2 - 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER THERETO; 

CASE NO. 2-06-CV-1233 MCE GGH PS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff JOSEPH E. GERBER and 

defendant CHASE BANK USA, N.A. (“CHASE”), through their counsel of record that CHASE 

may have an extension of thirty (30) days, from August 10, 2006 to and including September 10, 

2006 within which to answer, respond or object to the Complaint in this action. One previous 

extension has been granted. This extension is necessary because plaintiff has informed CHASE 

that he intends to file an amended complaint. 

Dated: , 2006 ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 

By: /s/ 

GEORGE G. WEICKHARDT 

PAMELA J. ZANGER 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CHASE BANK USA, N.A., erroneously sued 

herein as CHASE 

Dated: , 2006 Plaintiff In Pro Per 

/s/ 

JOSEPH E. GERBER 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that CHASE may have up to and including September 10, 

2006 within which to answer, respond or object to the Complaint in this action. 

DATED: August 15, 2006 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-01233-MCE -GGH Document 12 Filed 08/15/06 Page 2 of 3
R

o

p

e rs M

a j e s ki K

o

h

n

&

B

e

n tl e

y

A Professional Corporation

San Francisco

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SF/196774.1/PJZ - 3 - 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER THERETO; 

CASE NO. 2-06-CV-1233 MCE GGH PS

CASE NAME: Gerber v. Chase 

ACTION NO.: 2-06-CV-1233 MCE GGH PS

PROOF OF SERVICE 

I am a citizen of the United States. My business address is 201 Spear Street, Suite 1000, San 

Francisco, CA 94105. I am employed in the County of San Francisco where this service occurs. I am 

over the age of 18 years, and not a party to the within cause. I am readily familiar with my employer’s 

normal business practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the U.S. Postal 

Service, and that practice is that correspondence is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service the same day as 

the day of collection in the ordinary course of business. 

On the date set forth below, following ordinary business practice, I served a true copy of the foregoing 

document(s) described as: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT AND ORDER THERETO

 ̈ (BY FAX) by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax 

number(s) set forth below, or as stated on the attached service list, on this date before 

5:00 p.m. 

ý (BY MAIL) I caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in 

the United States mail at San Francisco, California.

 ̈ (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand this date 

to the offices of the addressee(s).

 ̈ (BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered to an 

overnight delivery carrier with delivery fees provided for, addressed to the person(s) on 

whom it is to be served. 

Plaintiff In Pro Per 

Joseph E. Gerber 

P.O. Box 3222 

Carmichael, CA 95609 

Tel: (916) 944-2250 

Fax: (561)828-8049

ý (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court 

at whose direction the service was made. 

Executed on August 9, 2006, at San Francisco, California. 

 

 Eleanor L. Mangonon 

Case 2:06-cv-01233-MCE -GGH Document 12 Filed 08/15/06 Page 3 of 3