Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04232/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04232-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTO SALCIDO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DAVID ZAREK, M.D., et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________

_ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 04-4232 MMC (PR) 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

EXPERT

(Docket Nos. 43 & 45)

Plaintiff Sixto Salcido, an inmate at Salinas Valley State Prison proceeding pro se,

filed the above-titled civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging he received

inadequate medical care. After reviewing the complaint, the Court found plaintiff had stated

cognizable claims against defendants. Defendants have filed a motion for summary

judgment, and plaintiff has been granted an extension of time in which to file an opposition. 

By order filed September 19, 2005, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion for

appointment of a neutral expert witness. Now before the Court is plaintiff’s second motion

for appointment of a neutral expert witness. The instant motion is DENIED, for the reasons

set forth in the Court’s order denying plaintiff’s first motion. Plaintiff shall not file any

further motions seeking appointment of an expert witness. 

This order terminates Docket Nos. 43 and 45.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 19, 2005

_________________________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-04232-MMC Document 46 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 1