Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01160/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01160-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH THOMAS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-01160-JST 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

UNTIMELY FILING OF DEFENDANT'S 

MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: ECF No. 155

Before the Court is Defendant Margaret Sakai’s Motion to Dismiss Third Amended 

Complaint. ECF No. 155. The motion was filed on November 9, 2015. 

In its May 5, 2015 Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Order Enlarging Time, the 

Court continued the deadline to respond to the operative complaint until after the Court resolved a 

then-pending motion to consolidate cases. ECF No. 85. The May 5 order specified that if the 

Court granted the motion to consolidate, the Plaintiffs would have fourteen days to file an 

amended or consolidated complaint, and the Defendants would then have thirty days to answer or 

otherwise respond. Id. at 2. The Court granted the motion to consolidate on June 15, 2015, ECF 

No. 112, and the Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint on June 26, 2015, ECF No. 114. 

Accordingly, the deadline for Defendants to file their motions to dismiss was July 27, 2015.

The Court hereby orders Ms. Sakai to show cause why her Motion to Dismiss should not 

be stricken due to untimely filing. Ms. Sakai shall file her response to this order within seven days 

of its issuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 10, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-01160-JST Document 158 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 1