Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965-134/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ATOPTECH, INC,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-02965-MMC 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

RELIEF FROM NOVEMBER 9, 2016 

ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 902

Before the Court is defendant’s motion, filed November 28, 2016, for relief from a 

nondispositive pretrial order of Magistrate Judge Ryu, filed November 9, 2016. 

Having fully considered the matter, the Court hereby DENIES the motion, for the 

reason that defendant has failed to show the subject order is clearly erroneous or 

contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (providing district court may reconsider 

magistrate judge’s order where it has been shown to be “clearly erroneous or contrary to 

law”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 8, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 908 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 1