Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-16-01063/USCOURTS-ca8-16-01063-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1063

___________________________

Stephen Bloomer; Karla Harksen

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

Joe Caffrey, Scott County Deputy Sheriff; Scott County Iowa; Unknown

Defendants

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

Henry W. Latham, II

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport

____________

 Submitted: August 17, 2016

Filed: August 22, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 16-1063 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/22/2016 Entry ID: 4439699 
Stephen Bloomer and his mother, Karla Harksen, appeal the district court’s1

adverse grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. 

This court reviewed the record de novo and carefully considered the arguments

for reversal. Summary judgment was proper. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643

F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (de novo standard of review; summary

judgment is appropriate if record, viewing facts and inferences in light most favorable

to nonmoving party, shows there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and 

moving party is entitled to judgment as matter of law).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa.

-2-

Appellate Case: 16-1063 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/22/2016 Entry ID: 4439699