Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06818/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06818-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Stipulation to Extend Time Within Which to File Dispositive Motions; Order Thereon - 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Charles L. Doerksen, #135423 

Attorney at Law 

2100 Tulare Street, Suite 410 

Fresno, California 93721 

559 233 3434 

IN ASSOCIATION WITH: 

Robert J. Taylor, Jr., #192202 

Attorney at Law 

1200 Paseo Camarillo, Suite 295 

Camarillo, California 93010 

805 389 2920 

Attorneys for plaintiff ARCHIE CRIPPEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT 

ARCHIE CRIPPEN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY OF FRESNO, 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: 1: 03 CV 6818 OWW DLB 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

WITHIN WHICH TO FILE DISPOSITIVE 

MOTIONS; ORDER THEREON 

Trial Date: May 23, 2006 

 WHEREAS, on January 27, 2006, the parties appeared before the Honorable 

Dennis L. Beck for a hearing on plaintiff’s motion to file an amended complaint; 

 WHEREAS, during the course of oral argument, counsel for defendant asked the 

court for an additional week to file its motion for summary judgment, which otherwise would 

have been required to be filed on February 6, 2005, which the court agreed to; 

Case 1:03-cv-06818-OWW -DLB Document 52 Filed 02/03/06 Page 1 of 3
Stipulation to Extend Time Within Which to File Dispositive Motions; Order Thereon - 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WHEREAS, counsel for each of plaintiff and defendant assumed that the court 

would move all of the other dates related to the summary judgment motion by one week as well, 

since otherwise, plaintiff would have only four days to respond to the motion based upon the 

current briefing schedule; 

 WHEREAS, on January 30, 2006, the court issued a Minute Order extending to 

February 13, 2006, the last day for the filing of motions for summary, but did not move any of 

the other dates; and 

 WHEREAS, the parties hereto would like to revise the schedule for the summary 

judgment motions to extend all time periods by one week, 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto through their 

respective counsel, that the filing and hearing of dispositive motions shall be as follows: 

 (a) The last day to file and serve moving papers is February 13, 2006; 

 (b) The last day to file and serve opposition papers is February 24, 

2006; 

 (c) The day to file and serve reply papers is March 6, 2006 and 

 (d) The motions shall be heard on March 13, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., in 

Courtroom 3. 

Dated: February 2, 2006 

 /s/ Charles L. Doerksen 

 _________________________ 

 Charles L. Doerksen, 

Attorney for plaintiff 

ARCHIE CRIPPEN 

Dated: February 2, 2006 BETTS & WRIGHT 

 /s/ Joseph D. Rubin 

 _________________________ 

Joseph D. Rubin, 

 Attorneys for defendant 

 CITY OF FRESNO 

Case 1:03-cv-06818-OWW -DLB Document 52 Filed 02/03/06 Page 2 of 3
Stipulation to Extend Time Within Which to File Dispositive Motions; Order Thereon - 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: February 3, 2006 

 ___/s/ Dennis L. Beck____________ 

 U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:03-cv-06818-OWW -DLB Document 52 Filed 02/03/06 Page 3 of 3