Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00201/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00201-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Although it appears from the file that one of plaintiff’s copies of the order was

returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court

apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents

at the record address of the party is fully effective.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT E. DEARMON, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0201 EFB P

vs.

A. ABEYTA, et al., ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

 /

On February 2, 2010, the court found that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis failed to include the certified copy of his trust account statement or institutional

equivalent required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) . The court ordered plaintiff to submit the

required trust statement within 30 days and warned him that failure to do so would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed the required trust statement or 

paid the appropriate filing fee or otherwise responded to that order.1

////

Case 2:10-cv-00201-MCE -EFB Document 5 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign a United States

District Judge to this case.

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: April 19, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-00201-MCE -EFB Document 5 Filed 04/19/10 Page 2 of 2