Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01628/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01628-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1628 FCD EFB P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 31, 2007, the district judge adopted this court’s July 17, 2007,

findings and recommendations and denied plaintiff’s October 12, 2006, motion for a temporary

restraining order and a preliminary injunction. The district judge’s order directed plaintiff to

comply with this court’s September 6, 2006, order to complete and return to the court, within 30

days, the forms necessary to effect service on defendants. The 30-day period has passed, and

plaintiff has not returned the forms necessary for service of process nor responded in any way to

the order.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

////

Case 2:05-cv-01628-FCD-EFB Document 49 Filed 11/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: November 1, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-01628-FCD-EFB Document 49 Filed 11/01/07 Page 2 of 2