Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03946/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03946-44/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ TRIAL EXHIBIT; 

CASE NO. C 04 03946 JW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

JOSEPH C. HOWARD, JR. [SBN: 050784] 

TODD H. MASTER [SBN: 185881] 

HOWARD ROME MARTIN & RIDLEY LLP 

1775 Woodside Road, Suite 200 

Redwood City, CA 94061 

Telephone: (650) 365-7715 

Facsimile: (650) 364-5297 

Attorneys for Defendants 

BRIAN LOVENTHAL and A. CURTIS WRIGHT 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

JOSEPH PADGETT and DARLA PADGETT, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

BRIAN LOVENTHAL, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 Case No. C 04 03946 JW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS BRIAN LOVENTHAL AND 

A. CURTIS WRIGHT’S MOTION TO 

EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ TRIAL 

EXHIBITS 

Trial Date: April 30, 2009 

Trial Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Judge: Hon. James Ware 

Before this Court is defendants BRIAN LOVENTHAL and A. CURTIS WRIGHT’s 

(hereinafter, collectively “defendants”) motion for an order excluding plaintiffs’ trial exhibits 

because plaintiffs refuse to provide copies of the documents they intend to use at trial and 

apparently intend to submit documents that were not disclosed during discovery. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiffs’ refusal to provide copies of their trial 

exhibits warrants the exclusion of those exhibits pursuant to in violation of Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure 26 (a), 26(e) and 37(c); Civil Local Rule 16-10(b)(7), this Court’s pretrial orders and 

this Court’s inherent authority. 

/// 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Judge James Ware

DENYING

 At this eleventh hour before the trial, and Plaintiffs having no opportunity to reply to the 

charges contained in Defendants' Motion, the Court DENIES the Motion without prejudice to be 

renewed. Defendants are invited to bring to the Court's attention any particular objections re: 

exhibits at trial. 

Dated: May 1, 2009 ____________________________ 

 JAMES WARE 

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:04-cv-03946-EJD Document 773 Filed 05/01/09 Page 1 of 1