Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02389/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02389-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND JOEL TAFOYA,

Petitioner, No. 2:07-cv-2389 GEB KJN P

vs.

R.J. SUBIA, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 23, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. 

Respondent has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:07-cv-02389-GEB-TJB Document 27 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 The court notes that, pursuant to the findings and recommendations (see Dkt. No. 24, at 1

p. 7), the Clerk of Court has sent petitioner a copy of page 8 of the November 1, 2007 petition,

which petitioner has now returned (Dkt. No. 26); thus, no further order on this matter is required.

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 23, 2010 (Dkt. No. 24) are

adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s July 27, 2009 motion to dismiss (Docket No. 19) is denied;

3. Respondent shall answer the petition within thirty days after the filing date of 1

this order, and shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant

to the determination of the issues presented in the application that are not already part of the

record; and

4. Petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed within thirty days from the date

respondents’ answer is filed.

Dated: March 29, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-02389-GEB-TJB Document 27 Filed 03/30/10 Page 2 of 2