Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03802/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03802-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1257529.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING AUO 

DEFENDANTS; NO. 3:12-CV-03802-SI, MDL NO. 1827 

Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 063607)

rheimann@lchb.com 

Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260) 

efastiff@lchb.com

Brendan P. Glackin (State Bar No. 199643) 

bglackin@lchb.com 

Marc A. Pilotin (State Bar No. 266369) 

mpilotin@lchb.com

LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 

275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 

Telephone: (415) 956-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Proview Technology Inc.

[Additional Counsel listed on signature page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to Individual Case 

No. 3:12-cv-3802-SI 

PROVIEW TECHNOLOGY INC., 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION; 

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION 

AMERICA, INC.; CHI MEI 

CORPORATION; CHI MEI INNOLUX 

CORPORATION; CHI MEI 

OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.; 

LG DISPLAY CO. LTD; LG DISPLAY 

AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD; 

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; 

and HANNSTAR DISPLAY 

CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

Case No. 3:12-cv-3802-SI 

MDL No. 3:07-md-1827-SI 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING AU 

OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU 

OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA 

Judge: The Honorable Susan Illston 

Location: Courtroom 10, 19th Floor 

Case 3:12-cv-03802-SI Document 133 Filed 05/26/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1257529.1 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING AUO 

DEFENDANTS; NO. 3:12-CV-03802-SI, MDL NO. 1827 

The Court having considered the Stipulation Dismissing AU Optronics Corporation and 

AU Optronics Corporation America, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows: 

1. All claims asserted by Proview Technology, Inc., against AU Optronics 

Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America in this action are hereby dismissed with 

prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). 

2. Each party to the Stipulation shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: , 2015

The Honorable Susan Illston 

United States District Judge

5/20

Case 3:12-cv-03802-SI Document 133 Filed 05/26/15 Page 2 of 2