Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05249/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-05249-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1 

NO. C 09‐05249 RS 

 ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

*E-Filed 01/06/2010* 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

GLORIA RUBIO, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.; 

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; AS A 

NOMINEE FOR LENDER; and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 09-05249 RS 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

 Plaintiff Gloria Rubio (“Rubio”) initiated this case by filing a complaint against defendants 

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (“Countrywide”) and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, 

Inc. (“MERS”) in Monterey Superior Court in October 2009. The complaint alleges violations of 

the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601, along with other state and federal claims, in relation to 

Rubio’s residential mortgage loan transaction. Countrywide and MERS removed the case to this 

Court in November 2009 and have moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 

 The motion to dismiss was filed December 11, 2009, and noticed for hearing on January 13, 

2010. Under Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Rubio’s opposition was due no less than 21 days before the 

Case 5:09-cv-05249-RS Document 14 Filed 01/06/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

NO. C 09‐05249 RS 

 ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

hearing date. No such opposition, however, has been received or served, and the due date has now 

passed. 

The hearing scheduled for January 13, 2010, is hereby vacated. No later than January 20, 

2010, plaintiff shall file a response to this order showing cause why this action should not be 

dismissed in its entirety. If defendants wish to file a reply to plaintiff’s response, they should do so 

no later than January 27, 2010. The parties shall appear for a show cause hearing in Courtroom 4, 

5th Floor, United States Courthouse, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California, on February 3, 

2010, at 9:30 a.m. Failure by plaintiff to respond by the deadline herein or appear at the show 

cause hearing may result in summary dismissal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 01/06/2010 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 5:09-cv-05249-RS Document 14 Filed 01/06/10 Page 2 of 2