Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03629/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03629-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICKY PERRY,

Plaintiff,

v.

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-03629-RS 

ADDENDUM TO ORDER DENYING 

TRO

After the order denying the application for a TRO was signed, plaintiff submitted a 

supplemental declaration asserting she had been compelled to wait until the last moment to bring 

her motion as a result of the general practice of lenders not to postpone foreclosure sales more

than a day or two in advance. Assuming that is indeed the general practice of lenders, it would 

have been all the more appropriate for plaintiff to seek a preliminary injunction promptly upon 

filing this action. Such a motion could have been heard on an expedited basis, if necessary, 

without compressing the available time to the degree that waiting until the eve of the sale did. The 

fact that a lender might postpone a sale at the last minute would not deprive a plaintiff of the right 

to have a judicial determination of whether a preliminary injunction should issue where a sale is 

scheduled in the near future, and has not yet been voluntarily postponed. Plaintiff’s supplemental 

declaration therefore provides no basis to reconsider the order denying her motion for a TRO.

Case 3:15-cv-03629-RS Document 35 Filed 10/09/15 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 15-cv-03629-RS

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 9, 2015

______________________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-03629-RS Document 35 Filed 10/09/15 Page 2 of 2