Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03940/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03940-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-03940-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

EDWARD D. JOHNSON (SBN 189475) 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 331-4537 

wjohnson@mayerbrownrowe.com

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

RICHARD J. FAVRETTO 

1909 K Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Telephone: (202) 263-3000 

Facsimile: (202) 263-3300 

rfavretto@mayerbrownrowe.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. 

Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CORISSA A. McDILL, 

on behalf of herself and all others 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC, VIRGIN 

ATLANTIC AIRWAYS LIMITED, and 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. CV 06-03940-EMC 

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 6-1 TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, in light of the transfer motion now pending 

before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) captioned In re 

International Air Transportation Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, MDL Docket No. 

1793, Plaintiff Corissa A. McDill (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants British Airways Plc, 

Case 3:06-cv-03940-EMC Document 23 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 1 of 6

; ORDER

Case 3:06-cv-03940-CRB Document 24 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 6
-2- 

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-03940-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited, and United Air Lines, Inc. (collectively, the 

“Defendants”), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as 

follows: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendants’ time to 

answer, move or otherwise plead is enlarged until the later of (1) the date when the 

Defendants would otherwise be required to file a response pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 12, or (2) 45 days after the JPML rules on the pending motion 

and consolidates each related action in a single court, and a consolidated complaint 

is filed by all plaintiffs in the single transferee Court and served on Defendants. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that each defense counsel 

designated below shall accept service on behalf of the Defendant represented by 

each such counsel of all complaints in the above-captioned matter, including any 

amended or consolidated complaints, and further, that such Defendant shall not 

contest sufficiency of process or service of process. This Stipulation does not 

constitute a waiver of any other defense including, but not limited to, the defenses 

of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction or improper venue. Nothing in 

this paragraph shall obligate any Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond 

to any complaint until the time provided in the preceding paragraph. The above 

notwithstanding, should any Defendant, except pursuant to court order, respond to 

any complaint in a related matter filed in another United States District Court prior 

to the date contemplated by this stipulation, then such Defendant shall make a 

simultaneous response to the complaint in the above-captioned matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

Case 3:06-cv-03940-EMC Document 23 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 2 of 6
 Case 3:06-cv-03940-CRB Document 24 Filed 08/01/06 Page 2 of 6
-3- 

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-03940-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: July 24, 2006 

Dated: July 24, 2006 

Dated: July 24, 2006 

STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS

ALVAREZ & SMITH, LLP 

/s/ ______ 

Allan Steyer (SBN 100318) 

D. Scott Macrae (SBN 104663) 

Bryan Kreft (SBN 211839) 

STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS

ALVAREZ & SMITH, LLP 

One California Street, Third Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

T: (415) 421-3400 

F: (415) 421-2234 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Corissa A. McDill 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

 /s/ ______

Edward D. Johnson (SBN 189475) 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

T: (650) 331-2000 

F: (650) 331-4537 

Richard J. Favretto 

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP 

1909 K Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Attorneys for Defendant United Air Lines, Inc.

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

/s/ ______

Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1870 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

T: (650) 461-5600 

F: (650) 461-5700 

Daryl A. Libow 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Attorneys for Defendant British Airways Plc 

Case 3:06-cv-03940-EMC Document 23 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 3 of 6
 Case 3:06-cv-03940-CRB Document 24 Filed 08/01/06 Page 3 of 6
-4- 

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-03940-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: July 24, 2006 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

/s/ ______ 

Harrison J. Frahn (SBN 206822) 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

2550 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

T: (650) 251-5000 

F: (650) 251-5002 

Charles E. Koob (SBN 47349) 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

425 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10017 

Attorneys for Defendant Virgin Atlantic 

Airways Limited 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Date: 

 

Honorable Judge Edward M. Chen 

Case 3:06-cv-03940-EMC Document 23 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 4 of 6

August 1, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:06-cv-03940-CRB Document 24 Filed 08/01/06 Page 4 of 6
-5- 

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-03940-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in Santa Clara County, California. I am over the age of 

eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300, Palo Alto, California 94306-2112. 

On July 24, 2006, I served the foregoing document(s) described as U.S. 

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

on each interested party, as follows: 

 by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax 

number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. 

: by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with 

postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Palo Alto, 

California addressed as set forth below. 

 by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed facsimile & U.S. 

Mail envelope and affixing a pre-paid air bill, and causing the envelope 

to be delivered to a facsimile & U.S. Mail agent for delivery. 

 by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) 

at the address(es) set forth below. 

Allan Steyer 

D. Scott Macrae 

Bryan Kreft 

STEYER LOWENTHAL 

BOODROOKAS ALVAREZ 

 & SMITH, LLP 

One California Street, Third Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Brendan P. Cullen 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1870 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Harrison J. Frahn 

SIMPSON THACHER & 

BARTLETT LLP 

2550 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Daryl A. Libow 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Case 3:06-cv-03940-EMC Document 23 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 5 of 6
 Case 3:06-cv-03940-CRB Document 24 Filed 08/01/06 Page 5 of 6
-6- 

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 

TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CV 06-03940-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Charles E. Koob 

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 

425 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10017 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of 

America that the above is true and correct. 

Executed on July 24, 2006, at Palo Alto, California. 

/s/ 

Shana M. Ryan 

Case 3:06-cv-03940-EMC Document 23 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 6 of 6
 Case 3:06-cv-03940-CRB Document 24 Filed 08/01/06 Page 6 of 6