Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02455/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02455-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT CURTISS and JENNIFER 

CURTISS, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SN SERVICING CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:23-cv-2455-KJM-SCR 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned 

in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This action commenced in 

this Court on October 23, 2023, when Defendants filed a Notice of Removal. ECF No. 1. At that 

time, Plaintiffs were represented by counsel. Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint on 

November 7, 2023. ECF No. 4. On December 11, 2023, this Court issued an Order to Show 

Cause noting that Plaintiffs had failed to respond to the motion to dismiss and directing Plaintiffs’ 

counsel to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. ECF No. 

11. Thereafter Plaintiffs’ counsel sought to withdraw as counsel, and the Court granted the 

request. ECF No. 20. The order allowing counsel to withdraw also directed Plaintiffs that: 

“Within fourteen days of being served with this order plaintiffs shall file a statement addressing 

whether they intend to continue in this action pro se or retain new counsel.” ECF No. 20 at 3. 

Case 2:23-cv-02455-DC-SCR Document 23 Filed 09/09/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Plaintiffs did not respond to the Court’s order and appear to have taken no further action to 

prosecute this matter. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall show cause, in writing, within 14 days, 

why this Court should not recommend that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for 

failure to comply with a court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and Local 

Rule 110. If Plaintiffs fail to respond, the Court will recommend dismissal of this case. 

SO ORDERED. 

DATED: September 9, 2024 

Case 2:23-cv-02455-DC-SCR Document 23 Filed 09/09/24 Page 2 of 2