Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00243/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00243-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUILLERMO E. BAZUA-AVILES, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

R.D. ANDREWS, et al., )

)

)

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:05-cv-00243-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 10)

ORDER DISMISSING AND DENYING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On February 22, 2005, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241 in this Court.

On August 25, 2006, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED as

MOOT and DENIED on the merits because the petition did not state grounds that would entitle

Petitioner to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and because Petitioner is no longer in the custody of

the United States Bureau of Prisons. (Doc. 10). This Report and Recommendation was served

on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fifteen days from

the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the

Case 1:05-cv-00243-AWI-TAG Document 12 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed August 25, 2006 (Doc. 10), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED as MOOT and

DENIED on the merits; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00243-AWI-TAG Document 12 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 2