Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02131/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02131-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANTIAGO CASSO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2131 LKK GGH P

vs.

K. MYERS,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed January 30, 2007, plaintiff was ordered to file a certified copy of

his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of

the complaint and the certification required on the application form within thirty days and was

cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and

has not filed a certified copy of his prison trust account statement.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned,

plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his

current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record

address of the party is fully effective.

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-02131-LKK -GGH Document 10 Filed 03/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 3/30/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

cass2131.fff

Case 2:06-cv-02131-LKK -GGH Document 10 Filed 03/30/07 Page 2 of 2