Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-05-02896/USCOURTS-ca8-05-02896-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 895
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 

---

1

The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2896

___________

Joe Aitro, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Henry S. Clapper; David Munton; * Western District of Missouri.

George Nichols; City of Lockwood, *

Missouri; Lockwood, MO Police * [UNPUBLISHED]

Department; Ryan Robison; Ruth *

Cottingham; Tamara Dewild; Lathrop *

& Gage, L.C., *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: August 28, 2006

Filed: September 5, 2006

___________

Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Joe Aitro (Aitro) appeals from the district court’s1

 dismissal of his complaint

with prejudice. We dismiss the appeal with prejudice for failure to comply with the

rules of appellate procedure. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(a)(2), 28(a); 8th Cir. R. 28A(f);

Appellate Case: 05-2896 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/05/2006 Entry ID: 2085798
-2-

Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 834-35 n.46 (1975) (pro se litigants must comply

with relevant rules of procedure); Haugen v. Sutherlin, 804 F.2d 490, 491 (8th Cir.

1986) (where appellant violated Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Eighth

Circuit Rules pertaining to form for briefs and record, holding that any further filings

by appellant would result in sanctions and dismissing appeal as frivolous). Aitro’s

request for oral argument and his motion seeking remand to state court are denied.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 05-2896 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/05/2006 Entry ID: 2085798