Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02192/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02192-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROL ROYE,

Plaintiff, CIV S-04-2192 DFL KJM PS

v.

FAIR ISAAC AND COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Presently calendared for hearing on May 24, 2006 is defendant Providian’s motion for judgment

on the pleadings. No opposition has been filed. Plaintiff has previously been advised of the

requirements for filing opposition but has once again failed to comply with the Local Rules.

Plaintiff is reminded that Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the

granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule

further provides that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral

arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In

addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of

opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that

failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions

Case 2:04-cv-02192-DFL -KJM Document 41 Filed 05/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of May 24, 2006 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s motion

for judgment on the pleadings is continued to June 21, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than

May 31, 2006. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement

of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed against

defendant LandSafe under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: May 16, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

roye2.nop

Case 2:04-cv-02192-DFL -KJM Document 41 Filed 05/17/06 Page 2 of 2