Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-00024/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-00024-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 04cv0024

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHOTOMEDEX, INC., Civil No. 04cv0024-L (CAB)

Plaintiff, ORDER:

1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR STAY OF DISCOVERY; and,

2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

v.

DEAN STEWART IRWIN; RA MEDICAL

SYSTEMS, INC.; and DOES 1-25, inclusive,

Defendant.

On November 6, 2006, the Court held a telephonic discovery conference on Plaintiff’s motion for

a stay of discovery, or in the alternative to compel further responses from Defendants. The motion was

submitted directly to chambers in the form of letter briefs. John Leonard, Esq., appeared for Plaintiff,

and Tracy Nation, Esq., appeared for Defendants. Having considered the submissions of the parties and

arguments of counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s request for a stay of discovery, pending resolution of its motion to consolidate

this action with Case No. 06cv1479-L (CAB) and Defendants’ motion to dismiss the

counterclaims filed in that matter, is DENIED. The discovery cut-off in this case

remains November 30, 2006. The parties are, however, permitted to conclude timely

noticed depositions after the cut-off to accommodate the schedules of witnesses and

counsel.

2. Defendant shall produce, either directly or by specific reference to Bates numbers, any

and all specifications, manuals and any other technical documents provided to customers

Case 3:04-cv-00024-JLS-CAB Document 103 Filed 11/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 04cv0024

with delivery of its laser product in August 2004. This production will be made no later

than November 17, 2006.

3. Plaintiff shall provide Defendants with a list identifying such financial documents that

Plaintiff’s expert requires to test financial opinions he formulated based upon

Defendants’ previously produced summary financial information, no later than

November 10, 2006. Defendants shall provide the responsive documents, if any, no later

than November 17, 2006. Plaintiff shall serve an amended expert report no later than

November 28, 2006. Defendants shall serve their rebuttal report no later than December

12, 2006. The depositions of financial experts must be concluded no later than January

12, 2007.

4. If Plaintiff does not identify any additional financial documents by November 10, 2006,

the request for further documents will be deemed moot, and Defendants shall provide

their rebuttal report no later than November 20, 2006, and the depositions of financial

experts shall be concluded no later than December 22, 2006.

DATED: November 7, 2006

CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-00024-JLS-CAB Document 103 Filed 11/07/06 Page 2 of 2