Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02569/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02569-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

STIP & PROP ORDER TO MODIFY HRG SCHE n:\labor\li2008\080165\00493403.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

ELIZABETH SALVESON, State Bar #83788 Chief Labor Attorney 

MARGARET W. BAUMGARTNER, State Bar #151762 

ADELMISE R. WARNER, State Bar #215385 

Deputy City Attorneys 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, Floor No. 5 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3959 

Facsimile: (415) 554-4248 

Attorneys For Defendants 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL. 

JOHN HOUSTON SCOTT, State Bar # 72578 

LIZABETH N. DE VRIES, State Bar # 227215 

SCOTT LAW FIRM 

1375 Sutter Street, Suite 222 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

CLIFFORD COOK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CLIFFORD COOK, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, ANTONIO FLORES, 

DON SLOAN, MARSHA ASHE, and 

DOES 1-50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 07-02569 CRB 

STIPULATION TO MODIFY 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE 

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND 

OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO 

DISMISS CLAIMS, AND PROPOSED 

ORDER 

Hearing Date: July 25, 2008 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom 8, 19th Fl. 

Date action filed: May 15, 2007 

CASE NO. C 07-02569 CRB

Case 3:07-cv-02569-CRB Document 64 Filed 07/03/08 Page 1 of 4
STIP & PROP ORDER TO MODIFY HRG SCHE 1 n:\labor\li2008\080165\00493403.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, on June 18, 2008, Plaintiff, Clifford Cook, filed a Motion to Amend the 

Complaint, Or In The Alternative, to Dismiss Two Claims Without Prejudice in the above matter; 

WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled the hearing for July 25, 2008; 

WHEREAS, the City’s opposition would be due on July 3, 2008 absent an order continuing 

the deadlines to a future date, 

WHEREAS, as represented to the Court at the last status conference, lead counsel for the City 

(Margaret Baumgartner) has been out of the country since June 17, and will return on July 9; 

WHEREAS, per the Court's Order, summary-judgment motions are due on August 1, 2008, 

such that continuing the hearing of July 25, 2008 might conflict with the August deadline; 

WHEREAS, after meeting and conferring, the parties agree to the following briefing schedule 

to give Ms. Baumgartner an opportunity to review the motion, and file the City's opposition (if any): 

1. Defendant's Opposition (if any) to Plaintiff's motion shall be due on or before July 14 and 

2. Plaintiff's Reply (if any) shall be due on or before July 21. 

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court issue an order that: 

1. Defendant's Opposition (if any) to Plaintiff's motion shall be due on or before July 14 and 

2. Plaintiff's Reply (if any) shall be due on or before July 21. 

Dated: July 1, 2008 Respectfully submitted, 

DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

ELIZABETH S. SALVESON 

Chief Labor Attorney 

MARGARET W. BAUMGARTNER 

ADELMISE ROSEMÉ WARNER 

Deputy City Attorneys 

By:__________/s/_____________ 

ADELMISE ROSEMÉ WARNER 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

CASE NO. C 07-02569 CRB

Case 3:07-cv-02569-CRB Document 64 Filed 07/03/08 Page 2 of 4
STIP & PROP ORDER TO MODIFY HRG SCHE 2 n:\labor\li2008\080165\00493403.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: July 1, 2008 SCOTT LAW FIRM 

By:__________/s/____________ 

 LIZABETH DEVRIES 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

CLIFFORD COOK 

CASE NO. C 07-02569 CRB

Case 3:07-cv-02569-CRB Document 64 Filed 07/03/08 Page 3 of 4
STIP & PROP ORDER TO MODIFY HRG SCHE 3 n:\labor\li2008\080165\00493403.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 

1. Defendant's Opposition (if any) to Plaintiff's motion shall be due on or before July 14 and 

2. Plaintiff's Reply (if any) shall be due on or before July 21. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________________________

HON. CHARLES R. BREYER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

CASE NO. C 07-02569 CRB

July 2, 2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

The hearing is rescheduled to July 24, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.

Case 3:07-cv-02569-CRB Document 64 Filed 07/03/08 Page 4 of 4