Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06443/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06443-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTHA RIVERA, MAO HER, )

ALICIA ALVAREZ, EVA ARRIOLA, )

PEUANG BOUNNHONG, CHHOM )

CHAN, BEE LEE, PAULA MARTINEZ, )

MARIA MEDINA, MAI MEEMOUA, )

MARGARITA MENDOZA, BAO NHIA )

MOUA, ISIDRA MURILLO, MARIA )

NAVARRO, VATH RATTANATAY, )

OFELIA RIVERA, SARA RIVERA, )

MARIA RUIZ, MARIA VALDIVIA, SY )

VANG, YOUA XIONG, and SEE YANG )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

NIBCO, INC., an Indiana Corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CIV- F-99-6443 AWI SMS

ORDER VACATING

HEARING DATE OF

OCTOBER 17, 2005, AND

MOVING THE MATTER SO

AS TO BE HEARD IN

CONJUNCTION WITH

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS 

On August 5, 2005, the Court issued an order resetting the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion

for Separate Trials to October 17, 2005, so as to be heard with dispositive motions. The hearing

on dispositive motions has been reset by stipulation of the parties and order of the magistrate to

November 21, 2005, at 1:30 p.m. In light of the new November 21, 2005, dispositive motion

hearing date, it is appropriate to move the hearing on Plaintiffs’s Motion for Separate Trials. 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The previously set hearing date of October 17, 2005, is VACATED; and

2. Plaintiffs’s Motion for Separate Trial of Plaintiffs’s Claims for Backpay will be

heard concurrently with the parties’s dispositive motions and is RESET to

November 21, 2005, at 1:30 p.m., the currently scheduled hearing date for the

Case 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Document 288 Filed 09/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

parties’s dispositive motions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 29, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Document 288 Filed 09/30/05 Page 2 of 2