Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00861/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00861-51/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC WHEELER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ALISON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:12cv00861 LJO DLB PC

ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 

REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ REPONSE TO 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

(Document 223)

Plaintiff Eric Wheeler (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 

Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on May 25, 2012.

On January 21, 2015, the Court issued an order to show cause to Defendants why 

sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with the discovery order. The order 

permitted a response from Defendants within fourteen days.

On February 4, 2015, Defendants provided their response. The Court discharged the 

order to show cause on February 11, 2015.

Case 1:12-cv-00861-DAD-GSA Document 224 Filed 02/23/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On February 17, 2015, the Court received a sixty-four page “reply” from Plaintiff to 

Defendants’ response to the order to show cause. The order to show cause did not permit the 

filing of a reply, however, and the filing is therefore DISREGARDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 22, 2015 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00861-DAD-GSA Document 224 Filed 02/23/15 Page 2 of 2