Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00412/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00412-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT ALAN ANTON,

Plaintiff, CV F 05 0412 OWW WMW PC 

vs. ORDER 

C/O MENDEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

On March 9, 2006, an order was entered, dismissing the compliant in this action and

granting Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. On April 11, 2006, Plaintiff filed a first

amended complaint. Plaintiff was granted leave to file a second amended complaint. That order

was returned as undeliverable, and the court recommended dismissal for Plaintiff’s failure to

prosecute. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court vacated the

findings and recommendations and granted Plaintiff an extension of time to file a second

amended complaint. That order was returned as undeliverable, and the court again recommended

dismissal. Plaintiff again objected, and the court vacated the recommendation and granted

Plaintiff an extension of time in which to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff failed to do so,

and the court recommended dismissal for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff filed objections.

This action therefore proceeds on the first amended complaint filed on April 11, 2006. In

Case 1:05-cv-00412-OWW -WMW Document 37 Filed 06/12/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

the order granting Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint, he was advised that the 

first amended complaint stated a claim for relief against C/O Mendez for excessive force. The

court granted Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint that corrects the defects noted

regarding the medical care claim. Plaintiff was specifically advised that should he fail to file an

amended complaint, the court would direct service of process upon Defendant Mendez, and

recommend dismissal of the remaining defendants. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

C/O MENDEZ

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send to plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, a

Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

first amended complaint filed April 11, 2006.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to

the court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Two copies of the endorsed first amended complaint filed April 11, 2006. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 11, 2008 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

Case 1:05-cv-00412-OWW -WMW Document 37 Filed 06/12/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00412-OWW -WMW Document 37 Filed 06/12/08 Page 3 of 3