Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05059/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05059-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1121 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TECH 21 UK LIMITED, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SPIGEN INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-05059-RS 

ORDER DENYING SPIGEN INC.'S 

MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant Spigen, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff Tech 21 UK Limited’s complaint

and a motion to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. 

Rather than respond to the motion to dismiss, Tech 21 filed a first amended complaint pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). Spigen’s motion to dismiss the complaint is 

therefore denied without prejudice to Spigen’s right to challenge the sufficiency of the First 

Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Because the averments in the FAC may alter the potential reasons 

to transfer the case, Spigen’s motion to transfer is also denied without prejudice. If Spigen wishes 

to pursue its motion to transfer, it may renotice the motion without filing additional papers. The 

case management conference will be rescheduled to take place on May 5, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 3:15-cv-05059-RS Document 33 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 2
<< SHORT ORDER TITLE >>

CASE NO. 15-cv-05059-RS

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Dated: February 2, 2016

______________________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-05059-RS Document 33 Filed 02/02/16 Page 2 of 2