Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04168/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04168-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YOULANDA MILLER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SUMMIT ALTA BATES HUMAN

RESOURCES DEPARTMENT and JIM

DeANGELES,

Defendants. /

No. C 04-04168 JSW

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

On April 21, 2006, the Court dismissed Plaintiff Youlanda Miller’s complaint against

Summit Alta Bates without prejudice for failure to prosecute. In the order dismissing the

complaint against Summit Alta Bates, the Court noted that it was unclear whether Ms. Miller

intended to bring her complaint against any other defendants and if so, what claim or claims she

intended to assert against them. Accordingly, the Court directly Ms. Miller to file an amended

complaint by no later than May 22, 2006, if she intended to pursue any claims in this matter

against any of individuals or entities other than Summit Alta Bates. The Court advised Ms.

Miller that her failure to file timely an amended complaint shall result in dismissal of this action

without prejudice. To date, Ms. Miller has not filed an amended complaint.

On April 24, 2006, mail sent from the Court to Ms. Miller was returned as

undeliverable. Ms. Miller has not filed any notice of change of address. Civil Local Rule 3-

11(a) requires that “a party proceeding pro se whose address changes while an action is pending

must promptly file with the Court and serve upon all opposing parties a Notice of Change of

Address specifying the new address.” Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) authorizes the Court to dismiss

Case 3:04-cv-04168-JSW Document 23 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a complaint without prejudice when “(1) Mail directed to the ... pro se party by the Court has

been 

returned as not deliverable; and (2) The Court fails to receive within 60 days of this return a

written communication from the ... pro se party indicating a current address.” More than sixty

days have passed since mail sent to Ms. Miller by the Court has been returned as undeliverable,

and Ms. Miller has failed to inform the Court of her current address. Therefore, pursuant to

Local Civil Rule 3-11(b), the Court HEREBY DISMISSES this action without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 26, 2006 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-04168-JSW Document 23 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2