Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-02898/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-02898-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Shaunnell Jacqui Beyart, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora Schriro; Arizona Attorney General, 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 04-2898 PHX-NVW (MS)

ORDER

Before the Court are Petitioner's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a

Person in State Custody filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. # 1), United States

Magistrate Judge Morton Sitver's Report and Recommendation (doc. # 16), and Petitioner's

Objection to the Court's Report and Recommendation (doc. # 22).

The Court has considered Petitioner's objections and reviewed the Report and

Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the

Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and

Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the

magistrate judge's determinations, accepts his recommended decision within the meaning of

Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner's objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)

(stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings

or recommendations made by the magistrate”).

Case 2:04-cv-02898-NVW Document 23 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Sitver (doc. # 16) is accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. # 1) is denied

and dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment

accordingly and terminate this action. 

DATED this 10th day of May 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-02898-NVW Document 23 Filed 05/11/06 Page 2 of 2