Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00555/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00555-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BAHARI PRASAD, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-0555 KJM GGH PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

By order filed August 5, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight days 

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff of the 

deficiencies in the complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 

filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

 Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the reasons given 

in the August 5, 2015 order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed 

with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 

Case 2:15-cv-00555-KJM-GGH Document 10 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

fourteen days after service of the objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991). 

Dated: January 11, 2016 

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

GGH:076/Prasad0555.fta 

Case 2:15-cv-00555-KJM-GGH Document 10 Filed 01/11/16 Page 2 of 2