Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01764/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01764-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

Stipulation re: Time To Respond To Complaint

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RUSS, AUGUST 

&

KABAT

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

Ian C. Ballon, State Bar No. 141819

ballon@gtlaw.com

Monica A. Hernandez, State Bar No. 280195

hernandezmo@gtlaw.com

1900 University Avenue, 5th Floor

East Palo Alto, California 94303

Telephone: (650) 328-8500

Facsimile: (650) 328-8508

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CafePress Inc.

RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT

Brian D. Ledahl, State Bar No. 186579

Email: bledahl@raklaw.com

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, California 90025

Telephone: (310) 826-7474

Facsimile: (310) 826-6991

Attorneys for Defendant

Stonemark Technologies, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

CAFEPRESS INC.

Plaintiff,

vs.

STONEMARK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-01764 YGR (LB)

STIPULTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO 

COMPLAINT

Case 4:16-cv-01764-YGR Document 16 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 3
2

Stipulation re: Time to Respond to Complaint

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RUSS, AUGUST 

&

KABAT

WHEREAS Plaintiff CafePress Inc. served its complaint in this matter on April 8, 2016; 

and

WHEREAS the parties have agreed upon an extension of thirty (30) days of Defendant 

Stonemark Technologies, LLC’s time to respond to the complaint.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto, by and through counsel, stipulate and agree that 

Defendant Stonemark Technologies, LLC’s time to respond to the complaint in this matter shall 

be extended by 30 days to May 31, 2016.

DATED: April 29, 2016 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT

Brian D. Ledahl

By: /s/ Brian D. Ledahl_________________ Brian D. Ledahl

Attorneys for Defendant

Stonemark Techologies, LLC

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

Ian C. Ballon

Monica A. Hernandez

Joshua L. Raskin

Vimal M. Kapadia

By:___/s/ Monica A. Hernandez (with approval)

Monica A. Hernandez

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CafePress Inc.

Case 4:16-cv-01764-YGR Document 16 Filed 05/09/16 Page 2 of 3
3

Stipulation re: Time to Respond to Complaint

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RUSS, AUGUST 

&

KABAT

ATTESTATION RE: SIGNATURES

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document by all individuals whose signatures 

appear thereon was obtained in advance of the filing.

By:__/s/ Brian D. Ledahl____________

Brian D. Ledahl

Case 4:16-cv-01764-YGR Document 16 Filed 05/09/16 Page 3 of 3