Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00035/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00035-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA POUGH,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0035 MCE EFB P

vs.

BRIAN HIXON, et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner’s originally filed a motion seeking to collaterally attack his conviction pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. That motion was dismissed was dismissed on May 23, 2007. Petitioner

was given thirty days to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed a petition for writ of habeas

corpus or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

Case 2:07-cv-00035-MCE -EFB Document 10 Filed 07/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 17, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-00035-MCE -EFB Document 10 Filed 07/17/07 Page 2 of 2