Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06120/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06120-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD D. ASHFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

DR. JEFFREY NEUBARTH, M.D., 

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO. 1:04-cv-06120-LJO-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

(Docs. 50 and 65)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT

Plaintiff Edward D. Ashford (“plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this tort action filed on August 17, 2004. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 12, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed aFindings and Recommendations herein which

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. On June 14, 2007, plaintiff was

granted a thirty-day extension of time to file an Objection, but to date, neither party has objected.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 12, 2007, is adopted in full;

///

Case 1:04-cv-06120-LJO -LJO Document 69 Filed 08/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, filed September 7, 2006, is GRANTED,

thus concluding this matter in its entirety; and

3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for defendant and against plaintiff and

close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 16, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06120-LJO -LJO Document 69 Filed 08/16/07 Page 2 of 2