Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00485/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00485-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. C 04-0098-SI; 04-0099-SI / No. 09-0485-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-7(a)

JONATHAN R. BASS (State Bar No. 75779)

MARIO A. MOYA (State Bar No. 262059)

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP

One Ferry Building, Suite 200

San Francisco, California 94111-4213

Telephone: 415.391.4800

Facsimile: 415.989.1663

Email: ef-jrb@cpdb.com,

ef-mam@cpdb.com

Attorneys for WAUKEEN Q. McCOY

(additional counsel on signature page)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD ALVARADO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FEDEX CORPORATION d/b/a/ FEDEX

EXPRESS,

Defendant.

EDWARD ALVARADO and CHARLOTTE

BOSWELL,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WAUKEEN McCOY, KAY M. PARKER,

and MICHAEL DAVIS,

Defendants.

Case No. C 04-0098-SI; 04-0099-SI

Case No. 09-485-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO EXTEND HEARING DATE

ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO

LOCAL RULE 7-7(a)

Hearing Date: April 30, 2010

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Courtroom: 10 (19th Floor)

Judge: Honorable Susan Illston

Case 3:09-cv-00485-SI Document 54 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

13676.002.1394467v1 1 No. C 04-0098-SI; 04-0099-SI / No. 09-0485-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-7(a)

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-7(a), Plaintiffs Edward Alvarado and Charlotte Boswell,

and Defendants Waukeen Q. McCoy and Kay M. Parker, by and through their respective counsel

of record, stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, no trial date is currently set in this case;

WHEREAS, no scheduling order has been issued in this case;

WHEREAS, the hearing date on Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is currently

scheduled for April 30, 2010;

WHEREAS, the deadline for filing an opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for summary

judgment has not yet lapsed;

WHEREAS, no defendant has filed an opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for summary

judgment;

WHEREAS, after meeting and conferring with Plaintiffs' counsel and counsel for

Defendant Parker, Defendant McCoy has agreed to re-notice the depositions of Plaintiffs Alvarado

and Boswell for Wednesday April 7 and Monday April 12, respectively;

WHEREAS, Defendant has also requested the production of certain documents and

materials at the Plaintiffs' depositions;

WHEREAS, extending the hearing date on Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment by

one week will not alter any other court dates set in this matter;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AND STIPULATE as follows:

1. The hearing date on Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment shall be extended

from April 30, 2010 to May 7, 2010 at 9 a.m., or a hearing date at the Court's convenience.

2. Defendants' oppositions and Plaintiffs' reply to the motion for summary judgment

shall be filed in accordance with Rule 56 and Civil Local Rules 7-3 and 56-1 with reference to the

new hearing date.

///

///

///

Case 3:09-cv-00485-SI Document 54 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

13676.002.1394467v1 2 No. C 04-0098-SI; 04-0099-SI / No. 09-0485-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-7(a)

3. Nothing in this Stipulation shall waive Defendant McCoy's rights to seek relief

pursuant to Rule 56(f), should the discovery described above remain outstanding despite his

diligence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: April 1, 2010 COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP

By: /s/ Mario A. Moya

Mario A. Moya

Attorneys for WAUKEEN Q. McCOY

DATED: April 1, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN M. MURPHY

By: /s/ Stephen M. Murphy

Stephen M. Murphy

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Edward Alvarado and

Charlotte Boswell

DATED: April 1, 2010 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP

By: /s/ Kenneth Walczak

Kenneth Walczak

Attorneys for Defendant Kay M. Parker

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: April ___, 2010

Hon. Susan Illston

United States District Judge

Northern District of California

Case 3:09-cv-00485-SI Document 54 Filed 04/07/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

13676.002.1394467v1 3 No. C 04-0098-SI; 04-0099-SI / No. 09-0485-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-7(a)

ATTESTATION PER GENERAL ORDER 45, § X.B.

I hereby attest that Stephen Murphy, counsel for Plaintiffs, and Kenneth Walczak, counsel

for Defendant Kay M. Parker, concur in the filing of this document, and that I have on file all

holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document.

DATED: April 1, 2010 COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP

By: /s/ Mario A. Moya

Mario A. Moya

Attorneys for WAUKEEN Q. McCOY

Case 3:09-cv-00485-SI Document 54 Filed 04/07/10 Page 4 of 4