Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01021/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01021-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL n:\ptc\li2006\061009\00441493.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Deputy 

KRISTINE A. POPLAWSKI, State Bar #160758

Deputy City Attorney 

1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3878 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

Attorneys for Cross-Claimant and Cross-Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND 

SURETY COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C06-1021 PJH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation, 

 Cross-claimant, 

 vs. 

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND 

SURETY COMPANY, a Connecticut 

corporation; GENERAL MOTORS 

CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation; LORONIX, INC., a 

California corporation; VERINT 

SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation; 

NEOPLAN USA CORPORATION, a 

Colorado corporation, 

 Cross-Defendants. 

CASE NO. C06-1021 PJH

Case 4:06-cv-01021-PJH Document 147 Filed 12/18/07 Page 1 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 n:\ptc\li2006\061009\00441493.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the parties' Stipulation of 

Dismissal, Cross-Complainant and Cross-Defendant, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

("CITY"), and Cross-Complainant and Cross-Defendant NEOPLAN USA CORPORATION, 

("NEOPLAN"), by and through counsel, have represented to the Court that they have stipulated to the 

dismissal with prejudice of NEOPLAN's Second Cause of Action (Breach of Contract/Business 

Duress) and Third Cause of Action (Quantum Meruit) asserted against the CITY, pursuant to which 

stipulation the CITY and NEOPLAN jointly move for dismissal with prejudice of such causes of 

action. 

Upon consideration whereof and for good cause shown, it is accordingly ORDERED that 

NEOPLAN's Second Cause of Action (Breach of Contract/Business Duress) and Third Cause of 

Action (Quantum Meruit) asserted against the CITY, be, and the same hereby are, DISMISSED, with 

prejudice, with the parties bearing their own costs, attorney's fees and expenses relating to these 

causes of action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________________, 2007 ________________________________ 

 The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton 

 Judge 

CASE NO. C06-1021 PJH

December 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-01021-PJH Document 147 Filed 12/18/07 Page 2 of 3
PROOF OF SERVICE 1 n:\ptc\li2006\061009\00441493.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Martina Hassett, declare as follows: 

I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the aboveentitled action. I am employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building, 

1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102. 

On December 18, 2007, I served the following document(s): 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

on the following persons at the locations specified: 

Matthew F. Graham, Esq. 

Tammy A. Brown, Esq. 

Aiken, Kramer & Cummings, Inc. 

c/o Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean, LLP 

1111 Broadway, 24th Floor 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Telephone: (510) 834-6600 

Facsimile: (510) 834-1928 

(Counsel for Neoplan USA Corporation)

Patricia M. Coleman, Esq. 

K. Lynn Finateri, Esq. 

Dykema Gossett LLP 

333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 457-1800 

Facsimile: (213) 457-1850 

(Counsel for Defendant General 

Motors Corp.) 

in the manner indicated below: 

BY E-FILING: Via the court-mandated e-filing service. 

I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed December 18, 2007, at San Francisco, California. 

 /s/ Martina Hassett 

 Martina Hassett 

CASE NO. C06-1021 PJH

Case 4:06-cv-01021-PJH Document 147 Filed 12/18/07 Page 3 of 3