Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00856/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00856-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 On December 21, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to file an objection to the

Findings and Recommendations filed on December 8, 2005, which has been granted by the Court. (Doc. 32.) 

However, plaintiff did not seek an extension of time to file an objection to the December 13 Findings and

Recommendations. Regardless, Plaintiff has not filed objections to either Findings and Recommendations.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH BLACKWELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-00856-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, WITH PREJUDICE

(Docs. 24 and 28) 

Plaintiff Keith Blackwell (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On December 13, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations that

recommended Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. The Findings and

Recommendations contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and

Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file timely objections to the

Findings and Recommendations.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Case 1:05-cv-00856-AWI -SMS Document 37 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 13, 2005, is adopted in full;

and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed December 7, 2005, is

DENIED, with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 21, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00856-AWI -SMS Document 37 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2