Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-06120/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-06120-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION. TO 

EXTEND SCHEDULE FOR MSJ BRIEFING 

07-5470, 07-5985, 07-6120, 07-5702 

James F. Hurst (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

David J. Doyle (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Samuel S. Park (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

Stephanie S. McCallum (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

35 W. Wacker Drive 

Chicago, IL 60601-9703 

Telephone: (312) 558-5600 

Facsimile: (312) 558-5700 

Email: jhurst@winston.com; ddoyle@winston.com; 

spark@winston.com; smccallum@winston.com 

Nicole M. Norris (SBN 222785) 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

101 California Street, Suite 3900 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5894 

Telephone: 415-591-1000 

Facsimile: 415-591-1400 

Email: nnorris@winston.com 

Charles B. Klein (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

Matthew A. Campbell (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

1700 K Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20007 

Telephone: (202) 282-5000 

Facsimile: (202) 282-5100 

Email: cklein@winston.com 

Jeffrey I. Weinberger (SBN 56214)

Stuart N. Senator (SBN 148009) 

Keith R.D. Hamilton (SBN 252115) 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

355 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 

Telephone: (213) 683-9100 

Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 

Email: jeffrey.weinberger@mto.com; 

stuart.senator@mto.com; 

david.rosenzweig@mto.com; 

Michelle Friedland (SBN 234124) 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

560 Mission Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 

Telephone: (415) 512-4000 

Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 

Email: michelle.friedland@mto.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ABBOTT LABORATORIES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM 

CORPORATION, d/b/a 

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 07-5702 (CW) 

Related per December 5, 2007 Order to Case No. 

C 04-1511 (CW) 

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO 

EXTEND THE SCHEDULE FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING 

(Caption continued on next page)

Case 4:07-cv-06120-CW Document 169 Filed 08/23/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION. TO 

EXTEND SCHEDULE FOR MSJ BRIEFING 

07-5470, 07-5985, 07-6120, 07-5702 

SAFEWAY INC; WALGREEN CO.; THE 

KROGER CO.; NEW ALBERTSON'S, 

INC.; AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, 

INC.; AND HEB GROCERY COMPANY, 

LP, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 07-5470 (CW) 

Related per November 19, 2007 Order to Case 

No. C 04-1511(CW) 

RITE AID CORPORATION; RITE AID 

HDQTRS CORP.; JCG (PJC) USA, LLC; 

MAXI DRUG, INC D/B/A BROOKS 

PHARMACY; ECKERD 

CORPORATION; CVS PHARMACY, 

INC.; AND CAREMARK LLC, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 07-6120 (CW) 

Related per December 5, 2007 Order to Case No. 

C 04-1511 (CW) 

MEIJER, INC. & MEIJER 

DISTRIBUTION, INC.; ROCHESTER 

DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.; AND 

LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG 

COMPANY, INC., ON BEHALF OF 

THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS 

SIMILARLY SITUATED, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 07-5985 (CW) 

(Consolidated Cases) 

Related per November 30, 2007 Order to Case 

No. C 04-1511 (CW) 

Case 4:07-cv-06120-CW Document 169 Filed 08/23/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 1 - [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO 

EXTEND SCHEDULE FOR MSJ BRIEFING 

07-5470, 07-5985, 07-6120, 07-5702 

On August 18, 2010, Plaintiffs filed with the Court their Motion to Extend the Schedule 

for Summary Judgment Briefing. On August 19, 2010, Defendant Abbott Laboratories 

(“Abbott”) filed with the Court its opposition thereto. Having considered the papers submitted, 

the Court rules as follows: 

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend the Schedule for Summary Judgment Briefing is DENIED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

(See checked box below.) 

[ ] The summary judgment briefing schedule stipulated to by the parties, and previously 

approved by this Court, shall remain. The parties shall continue to follow that schedule. 

 

[ X ] The summary judgment briefing scheduled stipulated to by the parties, and 

previously approved by this Court, shall be modified according to the following schedule: 

Event Date 

Plaintiffs’ Briefs in Opposition to Motions for 

Summary Judgment 

September 9, 2010 

Declarations & Proposed Orders Sealing 

Materials Lodged by Plaintiffs in Connection 

with Plaintiffs’ Briefs in Opposition 

September 23, 2010 

Defendants’ Reply Briefs in Support of Motions 

for Summary Judgment 

September 30, 2010 

Hearing on Defendants’ Motions for Summary 

Judgment 

To be set by future order of the Court 

Dated: 8/23/2010 By: _________________________________ 

 Hon. Claudia A. Wilken 

 United States District Judge 

11498935.1 

Case 4:07-cv-06120-CW Document 169 Filed 08/23/10 Page 3 of 3