Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02464/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02464-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Plaintiffs failed to provide the Court with a chambers copy of their Statement of

Supplemental Authority and a supporting declaration, each filed July 31, 2015. 

Nonetheless, the Court has considered those documents. For future reference, plaintiffs

are reminded that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the Court’s Standing Orders,

parties are required to provide for use in chambers one paper copy of each document that

is filed electronically.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ZAK HURICKS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SHOPKICK, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C-14-2464 MMC

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Before the Court is defendant Shopkick, Inc.’s (“Shopkick”) “Motion for Summary

Judgment,” filed May 1, 2015. Plaintiffs Zak Huricks and Trista Robinson have filed

opposition, to which Shopkick has relied. Also, with leave of court, the parties have filed

supplemental briefs.1 Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in

opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for determination on the

parties’ respective written submissions, and VACATES the hearing scheduled for August

14, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 11, 2015 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-02464-MMC Document 114 Filed 08/11/15 Page 1 of 1