Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03123/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03123-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DLA PIPER RUDNICK 

GRAY CARY US LLP 

-1- 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: ADR 

C05-3123 CW 

EM\7200853.1 

335142-101 

BRIAN M. FOGARTY (Bar No. 218792) 

DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP 

401 B Street, Suite 1700 

San Diego, California 92101-4297 

Telephone: 619.699.2620 

Facsimile: 619.699.2701 

brian.fogarty@dlapiper.com 

THOMAS A. BURG (Bar No. 211937) 

DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2248 

Tel: 650.833.2016 

Fax: 650.833.2001 

thomas.burg@dlapiper.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY 

MICHAEL J. BLUMENFELD (Cal. Bar No. 065239) 

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

One Kaiser Plaza 

The Ordway Building, Suite 1675 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 465-0555 

Facsimile: (510) 465-8093 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TENDERLOIN GROCERY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, a 

Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

TENDERLOIN GROCERY, a business 

entity; AHMED SAID, an individual; and 

DOES 1 – 10 inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. C05 3123 CW 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: ADR 

 

Case 4:05-cv-03123-CW Document 38 Filed 03/02/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DLA PIPER RUDNICK 

GRAY CARY US LLP 

-2-

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: ADR 

C05-3123 CW 

EM\7200853.1 

335142-101 

Plaintiff Lorillard Tobacco Company (“Lorillard”) and Defendants Tenderloin Grocery 

and Ahmed Said, hereby agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, in the December 8, 2006, Case Management Order the Court referred the 

parties to Early Neutral Evaluation as an ADR process; 

WHEREAS, counsel for defendants in this action also represents defendants in the 

Lorillard v. Gladstone Market, et. al., C-05-3122 RMW and Lorillard v. Barah Deli et. al., C-05-

3125 JF. Counsel for Lorillard is also the same in all three cases. The Gladstone Market and 

Barah Deli cases involve the same claims as the present case; 

WHEREAS, the parties in the Gladstone Market and Barah Deli cases are scheduled to 

participate in a settlement conference before Magistrate Lloyd on March 29, 2006; 

WHEREAS, all parties believe that attempting to settle the present case and the Gladstone 

Market and Barah Deli cases at the same time will be more effective, will be a more efficient use 

of the resources of the ADR program and will be more likely to lead to a settlement of all three 

cases; 

WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Lloyd’s chambers has indicated that it is willing to conduct 

a settlement conference in this case on the same day as the settlement conferences in the 

Gladstone Market and Barah Deli cases; 

WHEREAS, the parties respectfully request that the Court remove the present case from 

the ENE program and order that the parties participate in a settlement conference before 

Magistrate Judge Lloyd on the same day as the presently scheduled settlement conferences in the 

Gladstone Market and Barah Deli matters. 

// 

// 

Case 4:05-cv-03123-CW Document 38 Filed 03/02/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DLA PIPER RUDNICK 

GRAY CARY US LLP 

-3-

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: ADR 

C05-3123 CW 

EM\7200853.1 

335142-101 

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED THAT: 

1. The case is removed from the ENE program and the parties shall conduct a settlement 

conference before Magistrate Judge Lloyd on the same day, currently March 29, 2006, as the 

presently scheduled settlement conferences in the Gladstone Market and Barah Deli matters. 

 SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: ____________, 2006 DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US 

LLP 

By: ______________________________ 

 THOMAS A. BURG 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY 

Dated: ____________, 2006 MICHAEL J. BLUMENFELD A 

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

By: _______________________________ 

 CHERYL MARTINSEN 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 TENDERLOIN GROCERY and 

 AHMED SAID 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

3/2/06 /s/ CLAUDIA WILKEN 

Dated: ________________ 

_______________________________ 

 Hon. Claudia Wilken 

Case 4:05-cv-03123-CW Document 38 Filed 03/02/06 Page 3 of 3