Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04995/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04995-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

Teresa L. Highsmith – State Bar No. 155262 

Office of the City Attorney 

2263 Santa Clara Avenue, Room 280 

Alameda, California 94501-4477 

Telephone: (510) 747-4750 

Facsimile: (510) 747-4767 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF ALAMEDA POLICE DEPARTMENT. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TSOGTBAYAR SANDAGDORJ, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY OF ALAMEDA POLICE 

DEPARTMENT; OFFICER S. BRENNAN 

#512; OFFICER CRUZ #510; AND DOES 1-

100. Jointly and Severally, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: C-06-4995 TEH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE: SCHEDULE FOR FILING OF FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TIME FOR 

RESPONSIVE PLEADING BY 

DEFENDANTS. 

The parties, acting by and through their respective attorneys, appeared for the Initial Case 

Management Conference on January 8, 2007. At that time plaintiff’s counsel requested permission to 

file a First Amended Complaint. Defendants had no objection to the amending of the Complaint and 

informed the Court that it would provide additional information to the plaintiff’s counsel regarding 

the lack of involvement by the named defendants Brennan and Cruz so that plaintiff may consider 

dismissing them from the action. Because of illness this week on the part of the Inspectional Services 

Sergeant who was to provide a declaration documenting the lack of involvement by the individual 

defendant jailers, the defendant City will provide his declaration to plaintiff’s counsel on or before 

the initial ENE conference call on January 17, 2007. Plaintiff will file his First Amended Complaint 

Case 3:06-cv-04995-TEH Document 16 Filed 01/18/07 Page 1 of 2
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

on or before January 24, 2007. Defendants’ responsive pleading to be filed on or before Friday 

February 2, 2007. 

A further Case Management Conference will take place on Monday April 2, 2007 at 1:30 pm. 

A joint Case Management Conference Statement to be filed on or before March 26, 2007. 

 So Stipulated: 

Dated: January 11, 2007 By: ________/s/_______________________ 

 Hume Joseph Jung 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: January11, 2007 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

 By: /s/ 

 Gregory M. Fox 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 ALAMEDA POLICE DEPT. and 

 OFFICERS EMMANUEL CRUZ and 

 S. BRENNAN 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THE STIPULATION IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: January ______, 2007 

 THELTON E. HENDERSON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this E-filed document. 

Dated: January 11, 2007 /s/ 

 Gregory M. Fox

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:06-cv-04995-TEH Document 16 Filed 01/18/07 Page 2 of 2