Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_93-cv-00254/USCOURTS-caed-2_93-cv-00254-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1 S.W. Ornoski is substituted for his predecessors pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)(1). 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY ROBERTS, No. CIV S-93-0254 GEB DAD DP

Petitioner,

v. ORDER

S.W. ORNOSKI, Acting Warden

of the California State 

Prison at San Quentin,1

DEATH PENALTY CASE

Respondent.

 /

As indicated in the September 29, 2005 discovery order, and

in light of the dates proposed by the parties, a limited evidentiary

hearing regarding Discovery Request 85 is SET for February 7, 2006,

and if necessary February 8, 2006, in Courtroom 27 before the

undersigned magistrate judge. The first day of the hearing shall

commence at 10:00 a.m.

/////

Case 2:93-cv-00254-DAD-DB Document 312 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On or before January 17, 2006, petitioner shall file a prehearing statement identifying the witnesses and all exhibits or other

evidence he proposes to proffer at the limited evidentiary hearing. 

Petitioner also shall provide an estimate of the anticipated length

of the limited evidentiary hearing.

On or before January 24, 2006, respondent shall file his

pre-hearing statement, similarly identifying all witnesses and

evidence respondent proposes to offer and estimating the length of

the hearing.

Following the filing of the parties’ statements, the court

will contact the parties to arrange a telephonic conference in

advance of the limited evidentiary hearing if necessary.

As previously indicated, the parties are to be prepared to

schedule the remainder of this case (i.e., petitioner’s motion for

evidentiary hearing) at the conclusion of the limited evidentiary

hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 12, 2005.

DAD:th

ddad1/orders.capital/roberts.limited.evid.hearing

Case 2:93-cv-00254-DAD-DB Document 312 Filed 12/13/05 Page 2 of 2