Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_12-cv-00621/USCOURTS-azd-4_12-cv-00621-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Barbara S. Tesi, a widow and unmarried, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

ReconTrust, N.A., a California

corporation; Bank of America, N.A., a

foreign corporation doing business in the

State of Arizona, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 12-00621-TUC-JGZ

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States

Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco that recommends granting Defendant’s Motion to

Dismiss. (Doc. 17.) Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s

recommendation. 

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear

error the unobjected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. Johnson v. Zema

Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp.

2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Thus, the Court will review the Magistrate Judge’s

recommendation for clear error. 

Case 4:12-cv-00621-JGZ-BPV Document 18 Filed 06/12/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

As thoroughly explained by Magistrate Judge Velasco, Plaintiff’s claims for relief

have been firmly rejected by courts in Arizona. Because amendment would be futile, the

Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff’s Complaint should be dismissed with

prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) is accepted and adopted.

(2) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14) is granted.

(3) Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

(3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this

matter.

Dated this 11th day of June, 2013. 

Case 4:12-cv-00621-JGZ-BPV Document 18 Filed 06/12/13 Page 2 of 2