Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00275/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00275-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings With Prejudice 

Case No. C05-00275 JF (PVT) 

Horace W. Green (SBN 115699) 

Joanne M. Ryan (SBN 199193) 

GREEN & HUMBERT 

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 438 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 837-5433 

Facsimile: (415) 837-0127 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA and CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. LONG 

TERM DISABILITY PLAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JULIE SCOTT, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA and CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, 

Defendants. 

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 05-00275 JF (PVT) 

[Proposed] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS WITH 

PREJUDICE 

Date: October 6, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Ctrm: 3, 5th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

**E-filed 10/4/06**

Case 5:05-cv-00275-JF Document 48 Filed 10/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2. 

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings With Prejudice 

Case No. C05-00275 JF (PVT) 

The Motion of Defendants Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Cisco 

Systems, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan for judgment on the pleadings with respect to 

Plaintiff’s Second Claim for Relief in the First Amended Complaint came on regularly for 

hearing before this Court on October 6, 2006. Having reviewed the pleadings and papers 

filed herein, and having considered the arguments of counsel, and good cause therein, the 

Court hereby grants Defendants’ motion with prejudice, on the grounds that the Second 

Claim for Relief fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and judgment on 

this claim for relief may properly be entered under Rule 12(c), Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

___________________________ 

 HON. JEREMY FOGEL 

 United States District Judge 

10/4/06

Case 5:05-cv-00275-JF Document 48 Filed 10/04/06 Page 2 of 2