Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04328/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04328-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:2674 Federal Tort Claims Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SANDRA WAGES,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:14-cv-04328 HRL

ORDER RE FURTHER BRIEFING AND 

RE-SETTING HEARING

Pursuant to the court’s January 26, 2015 order, the parties have submitted their respective

proposals for supplemental briefing and a new hearing date re defendant’s motion to dismiss. 

Both sides having submitted matters outside the pleadings for the court’s consideration, 

defendant’s motion to dismiss will be converted to one for summary judgment.

1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 

12(d). This order is without prejudice to either party’s right to file a summary judgment motion re 

the merits of the case.

Each side having agreed to submit supplemental briefs (no more than 5 pages) by May 29, 

2015, they are directed to do so. Additionally, the parties may submit any supplemental 

 1 In support of her opposition to defendant’s motion, plaintiff submitted declarations that appear to 

pertain to her arguments re equitable tolling. The court is unsure what more plaintiff believes she 

needs to properly oppose defendant’s motion. But, if plaintiff feels she will be prejudiced if she is 

precluded from taking discovery as to the issue of equitable tolling (Dkt. 19 at 2), she is invited to 

specify for the court precisely what discovery she believes she needs.

Case 5:14-cv-04328-HRL Document 21 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

declarations and evidence they believe are necessary. The court grants the parties’ request to reset the motion hearing for June 16, 2015, 10:00 a.m.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 19, 2015 ______________________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:14-cv-04328-HRL Document 21 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

5:14-cv-04328-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

James A. Scharf james.scharf@usdoj.gov, mimi.lam@usdoj.gov

James F. McKiernan jmckiernan@mckiernanlaw.com

Mansour Sig Haddad shaddad@mckiernanlaw.com

Case 5:14-cv-04328-HRL Document 21 Filed 05/19/15 Page 3 of 3