Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01787/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01787-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

US_WEST:260014454.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

MODIFYING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE

DEADLINES (C-04-1787)

LYNNE C. HERMLE (STATE BAR NO. 99779)

JOSEPH C. LIBURT (STATE BAR NO. 155507)

JESSICA R. PERRY (STATE BAR NO. 209321)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: 650-614-7400

Facsimile: 650-614-7401

Attorneys for Defendants

APPLE COMPUTER, INC. and 

DAVID BLACK

WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY, ESQ.

LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY

703 Market Street, Suite 1407

San Francisco, CA 94103

Telephone: 415-675-7705

Facsimile: 415-675-2530

Attorneys for Plaintiff

NANCY ZAYED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NANCY ZAYED, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

APPLE COMPUTERS, a corporation doing 

business in California; DAVID BLACK, an 

individual, and DOES 1-50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. C-04-1787

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CHANGE TIME 

REGARDING EXPERT WITNESS 

DISCLOSURE DEADLINES 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:04-cv-01787-JW Document 90 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

US_WEST:260014454.1 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

MODIFYING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE

DEADLINES (C-04-1787)

The parties hereto, and their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS the Court previously entered a Scheduling Order in this case on 

February 1, 2005 and modified that Scheduling Order on July 22, 2005, October 18, 2005, and 

March 9, 2006;

WHEREAS fact discovery closed on October 3, 2005;

WHEREAS on May 1, 2006, the Court set the trial date in this matter and trial to 

commence on February 6, 2007;

WHEREAS the Parties are currently engaged in expert discovery;

WHEREAS plaintiff’s economic expert has had an unexpected event arise and will 

be unavailable until June 6, 2006; 

WHEREAS the Parties believe that extending the expert witness deadlines set 

forth in the Court’s March 9, 2006 Order as set forth below will be conducive to the efficient and 

expedient conduct of this litigation, will serve the ends of justice, and will not create any 

substantial delay, and will not affect the Parties’ trial date; and 

WHEREAS the Parties have previously requested three time modifications to the 

Scheduling Order deadlines set by the Court to extend the expert witness deadlines,

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The deadlines set forth in the Court’s March 9, 2006, Scheduling Order 

shall be modified as follows:

(a) the deadline to disclose expert witnesses pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(a) 

is June 23, 2006;

(b) the deadline to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses is July 21, 2006;

(c) the hearing deadline for motions objecting to the qualifications or 

proposed testimony of any expert is September 25, 2006; 

(d) The discovery deadline is August 11, 2006, as to expert discovery 

only, and discovery shall remain closed for all non-expert 

discovery.

Case 5:04-cv-01787-JW Document 90 Filed 05/09/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

US_WEST:260014454.1 -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

MODIFYING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE

DEADLINES (C-04-1787)

2. This Stipulation shall be made an Order of the Court.

Dated: May 9, 2006 LYNNE C. HERMLE

JOSEPH C. LIBURT

JESSICA R. PERRY

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

 /s/

Jessica R. Perry

Attorneys for Defendants

Apple Computer, Inc. and David Black

Dated: May 9, 2006 WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY, ESQ.

LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY

 /s/

Waukeen Q. McCoy

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Nancy Zayed

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________________, 2006

Hon. James Ware

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

May 9, 2006

Case 5:04-cv-01787-JW Document 90 Filed 05/09/06 Page 3 of 3