Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01217/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01217-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHNNY RODRIGUEZ,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-1217 GEB KJM P

vs.

T. FELKER, 

Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has also filed an application for leave to

file a second or successive § 2254 petition with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals concerning

the habeas petition filed in this action. See Docket Entry #3. Because it does not appear the

Ninth Circuit has ruled on petitioner’s request, the court will recommend that this action be

dismissed without prejudice to refiling after the Ninth Circuit does so.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice to refiling after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rules on petitioner’s March

17, 2008 request for leave to file a second or successive § 2254 petition. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

Case 2:08-cv-01217-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 06/17/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 16, 2008. 

1/mp

rodr1217.suc

Case 2:08-cv-01217-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 06/17/08 Page 2 of 2