Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-02494/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-02494-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441ds Removal- Contract Dispute

---

1

18cv2494-WQH (MSB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MABVAX THERAPEUTICS HOLDINGS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SICHENZIA ROSS FERENCE LLP, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 18cv2494-WQH (MSB)

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER [ECF NO. 60]

On September 17, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion asking the Court to enter 

their Protective Order [ECF No. 60]. In their joint motion, the parties asked the Court to 

resolve a single dispute regarding paragraph 12 of the protective order, wherein the 

parties disagreed about whether they should be permitted to share confidential 

material produced in this action with the parties and their counsel in Mabvax 

Therapeutic Holdings, Inc. v. Honig, et al., Case No. 19cv9810-WQH (MSB) (the “related 

Case”). (See ECF No. 60 at 2.) The Court held a telephonic discovery conference to 

discuss this issue with counsel for the parties on September 25, 2019. For the reasons 

discussed at the conference, and in the absence of any contradictory authority, the 

Court declines to add any substance to the protective order that has not been agreed to 

by both parties. The Court will therefore include the word “non-confidential” as 

Case 3:18-cv-02494-WQH-MSB Document 68 Filed 09/26/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

18cv2494-WQH (MSB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

requested by Defendants in paragraph 12. The Court has considered the remainder of 

the Stipulated Protective Order and, for good cause shown, GRANTS the joint motion. 

The Court will enter the parties’ stipulated protective order, described above, separate 

from this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 25, 2019

Case 3:18-cv-02494-WQH-MSB Document 68 Filed 09/26/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2