Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04985/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04985-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 896
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09:1 U.S. Arbitration Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04985-RS 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

Harrison J. Frahn IV (CA Bar No. 206822) 

hfrahn@stblaw.com

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 251-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

Peter C. Thomas (pro hac vice)

pthomas@stblaw.com 

900 G Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20001 

Telephone: (202) 636-5500 

Facsimile: (202) 636-5502 

Attorneys for Petitioner Apple Inc. 

PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

Yar Chaikovsky (CA Bar No. 175421)

yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com 

D. Stuart Bartow (CA Bar No. 233107) 

stuartbartow@paulhastings.com

1117 S. California Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 320-1800 

Facsimile: (650) 320-1900 

Attorneys for Respondents BYD Company 

Limited and BYD Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

APPLE INC.,

Petitioner, 

vs.

BYD PRECISION MANUFACTURING CO., 

LTD. AND BYD COMPANY LIMITED, 

Respondents.

Case No. 3:15-cv-04985-RS 

STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE

Hon. Richard Seeborg 

Courtroom: 3, 17th Floor 

Case 3:15-cv-04985-RS Document 76 Filed 12/28/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04985-RS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Petitioner Apple Inc. 

(“Apple”) and Respondents BYD Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and BYD Company Limited 

(“Respondents”) hereby submit the following Stipulation for Dismissal Without Prejudice. 

WHEREAS Apple and Respondents executed a Settlement Agreement on or about 

December 20, 2016; 

WHEREAS Apple and BYD Company Limited are contemporaneously filing with the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit a Stipulated Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss 

BYD Company Limited’s appeal from this Court’s March 2, 2016 Order; 

NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby agreed by the parties and ordered by the Court that: 

1. The above matter is dismissed without prejudice as to Apple’s claims and with 

prejudice as to Respondents’ defenses; and

2. Each side shall bear its own costs and fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________________________ 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: December 27, 2016 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV

Harrison J. Frahn IV 

Attorneys for Petitioner Apple Inc. 

 PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

By: /s/ Yar R. Chaikovsky

Yar R. Chaikovsky

Attorneys for Respondents BYD Company 

Limited and BYD Precision Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd.

12/28/16

Case 3:15-cv-04985-RS Document 76 Filed 12/28/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04985-RS 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from the signatories above. 

/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV 

 Harrison J. Frahn IV 

Case 3:15-cv-04985-RS Document 76 Filed 12/28/16 Page 3 of 3