Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01198/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01198-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE SPITTAL, )

)

Plaintiff, ) 2:04-cv-1198-GEB-DAD-PS

)

v. )

)

JAY SCHENIRER, et al., )

)

Defendants. ) ORDER

)

On December 13, 2005, Plaintiff filed motions for

reconsideration and recusal. The motion for recusal is denied. 

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is construed as a motion

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). “There are four

grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion may be granted . . .,”

none of which Plaintiff’s motion satisfies. Turner v. Burlington

Northern Santa Fe R. Co., 338 F.3d 1058, 1063 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01198-GEB-DAD Document 50 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:04-cv-01198-GEB-DAD Document 50 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2