Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00660/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00660-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHEROD M. SPENCER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-00660-AWI-SMS PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 7)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

A COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH

RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED (Doc. 1)

ORDER THAT THIS DISMISSAL

COUNTS AS A STRIKE UNDER 28

U.S.C. § 1915(G)

Plaintiff Sherod M. Spencer (“plaintiff”), a former state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On February 2, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within twenty days. To date,

Case 1:06-cv-00660-AWI -SMS Document 8 Filed 04/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

plaintiff has not filed any objection to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of

this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the

record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 2, 2007,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for plaintiff’s

failure to obey the Court’s order of December 15, 2006,

and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted; and

3. This dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. §

1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 11, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00660-AWI -SMS Document 8 Filed 04/12/07 Page 2 of 2