Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02610/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02610-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Defendant has not been served and has not appeared.

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Anthony Reynaga, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-2610-PHX-JAT

ORDER

On March 14, 2006, the Magistrate Judge ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this

case should not be dismissed. (Doc. #6). Plaintiff failed to respond and on May 15, 2006,

the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. #7)

recommending that this case be dismissed. 

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R.1

 Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts

the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not

required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”

(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en

banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s

findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis

in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Case 2:05-cv-02610-JAT Document 8 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #7)

is ACCEPTED; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Court orders pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b); and the clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly. 

DATED this 25th day of July, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02610-JAT Document 8 Filed 07/25/06 Page 2 of 2