Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04908/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04908-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE FOR RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C-06-4908 JW RS 379888.01 

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065 

ASIM M. BHANSALI - #194925 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

E-mail: efiling@kvn.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TOMOAKI HINOHARA, RYAN D. DRANT, 

JEFFREY B. CHILD, JOHN B. SIMPSON, 

SANFORD FITCH, MYRTLE S. POTTER, 

FOXHOLLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

LEO J. BIERMANN, Derivatively on Behalf 

of FOXHOLLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TOMOAKI HINOHARA, RYAN D. DRANT, 

JEFFREY B. CHILD, JOHN B. SIMPSON, 

SANFORD FITCH, MYRTLE S. POTTER, 

FOXHOLLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Defendants 

 Case No. C-06-4908 JW RS 

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE FOR 

RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT 

Date Comp. Filed: August 14, 2006 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:06-cv-04908-JW Document 6 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE FOR RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C-06-4908 JW RS 379888.01 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) of the Civil Local Rules for the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of California the parties “may stipulate in writing, 

without a Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the 

complaint;” and 

WHEREAS, a related securities fraud action, Kovarik v. Foxhollow Technologies, Inc. 

et al., No. C-06-4595-PJH (“Kovarik Action”), is currently pending in this Court; and 

WHEREAS, the parties in the Kovarik Action have stipulated that Defendants are not 

required to respond until 60 days after (1) the consolidated amended complaint is filed; or (2) 

Plaintiff indicates in writing an intent not to file a consolidated amended complaint; and 

WHEREAS, the parties in this action have met and conferred and agree that it is in their 

mutual interest to extend the defendants’ time within which to answer or otherwise respond to 

the complaint; and 

WHEREAS, this extension of time to respond will not prejudice any party, will not 

cause undue delay, and will not affect any schedule already entered by the Court; and 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 5:06-cv-04908-JW Document 6 Filed 09/06/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE FOR RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C-06-4908 JW RS 379888.01 

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED THAT:

1. Defendants TOMOAKI HINOHARA, RYAN D. DRANT, JEFFREY B. CHILD, 

JOHN B. SIMPSON, SANFORD FITCH, and MYRTLE S. POTTER acknowledge receipt of 

the complaint and waive service of summons and by the authorized signature of counsel below, 

enter their appearance in this action; and 

2. Defendants shall not be required to answer or otherwise move in response to the 

complaint in this action, or any complaint that is consolidated with this action, until the later of 

either (a) 30 days after an amended consolidated complaint is filed in Kovarik Action or 30 days 

after the plaintiff in the Kovarik Action indicates in writing that it does not intend to file an 

amended complaint; or (b) 30 days after plaintiff in this action files an amended complaint. 

Dated: September 5, 2006. KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/_________________________________ 

ROBERT VAN NEST 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TOMOAKI HINOHARA, RYAN D. DRANT, 

JEFFREY B. CHILD, JOHN B. SIMPSON, 

SANFORD FITCH, MYRTLE S. POTTER, 

FOXHOLLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Dated: September 5, 2006. GREEN WELLING LLP 

By: /s/_________________________________ 

ROBERT S. GREEN 

ELIZABETH C. GUARNIERI 

595 Market Street, Suite 2750 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 477-6700 

Facsimile: (415) 477-6710 

cand.uscourts@classcounsel.com 

Case 5:06-cv-04908-JW Document 6 Filed 09/06/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE FOR RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. C-06-4908 JW RS 379888.01 

 

FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 

WILLIAM B. FEDERMAN 

10205 N. Pennsylvania 

Oklahoma City, OK 73120 

Telephone: (405) 235-1560 

Facsimile: (405) 239-2112 

wfederman@aol.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LEO J. BIERMANN, Derivatively on Behalf of 

FOXHOLLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC 

Case 5:06-cv-04908-JW Document 6 Filed 09/06/06 Page 4 of 4