Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-03262/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-03262-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES: 

CASE NO. C 02-03262 DLJ (EMC) 

TAYLOR & CO. LAW OFFICES, LLP 

STEPHEN E. TAYLOR (SBN 58452) 

JESSICA L. GRANT (SBN 178138) 

JAYESH HINES-SHAH (SBN 214256) 

JONATHAN A. PATCHEN (SBN 237346) 

TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP 

One Ferry Building, Suite 355 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 788-8200 

Facsimile: (415) 788-8208 

E-mail: staylor@tcolaw.com 

E-mail: jgrant@tcolaw.com 

E-mail: jhinesshah@tcolaw.com 

E-mail: jpatchen@tcolaw.com 

RAGESH K. TANGRI (SBN 159477) 

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

E-mail: rtangri@kvn.com 

Attorneys for Defendants INTEL 

CORPORATION, LIGHTLOGIC, INC. 

and JEAN-MARC VERDIELL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

FRANK T. SHUM, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTEL CORPORATION, JEAN-MARC 

VERDIELL and LIGHTLOGIC, INC., 

Defendants. 

 Case No.: C 02-03262 DLJ (EMC) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING EXPERT 

DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Case 4:02-cv-03262-DLJ Document 626 Filed 08/08/08 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES: 

CASE NO. C 02-03262 DLJ (EMC) 

TAYLOR & CO. LAW OFFICES, LLP 

WHEREAS, on April 3, 2008, this Court entered an Amended Order for Pretrial 

Preparation setting the dates for: (1) the parties to complete fact discovery by July 28, 2008, (2) 

plaintiff Frank T. Shum (“Shum”) to serve expert reports by August 1, 2008, (3) defendants Intel 

Corporation (“Intel”), Jean-Marc Verdiell (“Verdiell”) and LightLogic, Inc. (collectively 

“Defendants”) to serve expert reports by September 5, 2008, (4) the close of expert discovery on 

October 3, 2008, (5) the parties to file motions in limine by October 10, 2008, and (6) the parties 

to file oppositions to motions in limine by October 17, 2008; 

WHEREAS, on July 31, 2008, this Court entered a Stipulation and Order Regarding 

Expert Discovery Deadlines (Docket No. 608) for: (1) Shum to serve expert reports by August 8, 

2008, (2) Intel, Verdiell and LightLogic to serve expert reports by September 12, 2008, and (3) the 

close of expert discovery on October 8, 2008; 

WHEREAS, defendants are in the process of completing additional fact discovery pursuant 

to Magistrate Judge Chen’s Order Re Hearing On July 23, 2008 (Docket No. 604); 

WHEREAS, on July 11, 2008, Shum served Notices of Deposition on Intel and Verdiell; 

WHEREAS, on August 1, 2008, defendants filed a Motion for Protective Order (Docket 

No. 609) to prevent the noticed depositions of Intel and Verdiell from being taken; 

WHEREAS, a hearing has not yet been conducted on defendants’ pending Motion for 

Protective Order; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Magistrate Judge Chen’s guidance, counsel for the parties 

continue to meet and confer about the conclusion of fact discovery, including the scope and timing 

of depositions (if any); 

WHEREAS, other than the outstanding issues enumerated in this Stipulation and discovery 

relating to Ernst & Young, fact discovery is closed; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Shum and counsel for defendants agree that: (1) the date for 

defendants to complete production of documents pursuant to Magistrate Judge Chen’s Order Re 

Hearing on July 23, 2008 (Docket No. 604) may be extended to August 15, 2008; (2) the date for 

Shum to complete his additional depositions (if any) of Intel and Verdiell may be extended to 

August 22, 2008; (3) the date for Shum to serve his expert reports may be extended from August 

Case 4:02-cv-03262-DLJ Document 626 Filed 08/08/08 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES: 

CASE NO. C 02-03262 DLJ (EMC) 

TAYLOR & CO. LAW OFFICES, LLP 

8, 2008 to September 2, 2008; (4) the date for defendants to serve their expert reports may be 

extended from September 12, 2008 to October 2, 2008; (5) the date for the close of expert 

discovery may be extended from October 8, 2008 to October 17, 2008; (6) the date for Shum to 

file motions in limine (if any) relating to defendants’ expert reports served on the dates specified 

above may be extended from October 10, 2008 to October 20, 2008, (7) the dates for Shum to file 

all other motions in limine remains unchanged, and (8) the date for defendants to file oppositions 

to Shum’s motions in limine relating to defendants’ expert reports served on the dates specified 

above may be extended from October 17, 2008 to October 24, 2008; and 

WHEREAS, allowing the dates of expert discovery to be extended as set forth immediately 

above will not affect any of the other pretrial dates, including the November 3, 2008 trial date. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among Shum and 

defendants, by and through their respective counsel, that: 

1. Defendants are to complete their document production by August 15, 2008; 

2. Shum is to complete his depositions (if any) of Intel and Verdiell by August 22, 

2008; 

3. Shum’s expert reports may be served on or before September 2, 2008; 

4. Defendants’ expert reports may be served on or before October 2, 2008; 

5. The expert discovery cut-off date may be extended to October 17, 2008; 

6. Shum’s motions in limine (if any) relating to defendants’ expert reports to be 

served on October 2 may be filed on or before October 20, 2008; and 

7. Defendants’ oppositions to Shum’s motions in limine relating to the defendants’ 

expert reports specified hereinabove may be filed on or before October 24, 2008. 

Dated: August 7, 2008 TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP 

 By: /s/ Jessica L. Grant 

 Jessica L. Grant 

Attorneys for Defendants INTEL CORPORATION, 

LIGHTLOGIC, INC. and JEAN-MARC VERDIELL 

Case 4:02-cv-03262-DLJ Document 626 Filed 08/08/08 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES: 

CASE NO. C 02-03262 DLJ (EMC) 

TAYLOR & CO. LAW OFFICES, LLP 

Dated: August 7, 2008 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

 By: /s/ Angus M. MacDonald 

 Angus M. MacDonald 

Attorneys for Plaintiff FRANK T. SHUM 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 

HONORABLE D. LOWELL JENSEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

I, Jessica L. Grant, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Expert Discovery Deadlines. I hereby attest 

that Angus M. MacDonald has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: August 7, 2008 TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP 

 By: /s/ Jessica L. Grant 

 Jessica L. Grant 

Attorneys for Defendants INTEL CORPORATION, 

LIGHTLOGIC, INC. and JEAN-MARC VERDIELL 

Case 4:02-cv-03262-DLJ Document 626 Filed 08/08/08 Page 4 of 4