Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03928/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03928-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 150
Nature of Suit: Overpayments &amp; Enforcement of Judgments
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIANE PANDOLFI, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

MARILYN MORENO AND MORENO FAMILY 

LAW FIRM, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 15-cv-3928 YGR

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO MODIFY 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

Re: Dkt. No. 32 

The Court is in receipt of the parties’ Stipulation for Order Modifying Pretrial Scheduling 

Order filed September 29, 2016. (Dkt. No. 32.) The Court will not grant the requested extension of 

dates and deadlines as the Court’s calendar will not permit a four-month extension. The parties’ 

stipulation is DENIED. 

However, if the parties wish to consent for all purposes to a magistrate judge who may be able 

to accommodate the requested trial date, they should meet and confer to discuss whether their clients 

will consent and to whom. The Court will accept stipulated requests for referral to a specific 

magistrate judge or magistrate judges. Profiles of all magistrate judges are available on the Court’s 

website at http://cand.uscourts.gov/judges and in the brochure, Consenting to a Magistrate Judge’s 

Jurisdiction In the Northern District of California (.pdf), also available on the Court’s website. 

This Order terminates Docket Number 32. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 30, 2016 

_______________________________________ 

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 5:15-cv-03928-HRL Document 33 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 1