Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00339/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00339-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

JOHN P. SUTTON (SBN# 36560)

Attorney at Law

2421 Pierce Street

San Francisco, CA 94115-1131

Phone: (415) 929-7408

Fax: (415) 922-2885

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STEVEN E. PAGANETTI (SBN# 087513)

WILD, CARTER & TIPTON

246 West Shaw Avenue

Fresno, CA 93704

Phone: (559) 224-2131

Fax: (559) 224-8462

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

QUISENBERRY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHRIS LEAVELLE, ET AL. 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 1:06-CV-00339-AWI-TAG

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

MANDATORY SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

Date: July 5, 2006

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Location: Bakersfield 

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff, Quisenberry and Defendant, Chris

Leavelle, individually and doing business as Chrisco Bit, by and through their respective

attorneys of record that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for July 5, 2006, at

10:0 a.m., be continued to August 4, 2006, at 9:30 a.m. based upon the following agreed facts.

WHEREAS, the Defendant is the moving party for a Motion To Dismiss Pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Section 12(b)(5) Hearing which is currently set for July 17,

2006, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 2 of the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United States District

Court-Eastern District of California; 

Case 1:06-cv-00339-AWI-TAG Document 12 Filed 07/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that it would be more beneficial to schedule the Mandatory

Scheduling Conference after the Motion to Dismiss Hearing is heard; 

Based upon the above, the parties agree to continue the Mandatory Scheduling

Conference from July 5, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., to August 4, 2006, at 9:30 a.m.

Dated: June 29, 2006 28, 2006 JOHN P. SUTTON

Attorney at Law

By:_________/s/_______________________

John P. Sutton, Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: June 28, 2006 WILD, CARTER & TIPTON

A Professional Corporation

By:_________/s/__________________

Steven E. Paganetti, Attorneys for 

Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 29, 2006 /s/ Theresa A. Goldner 

j6eb3d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:06-cv-00339-AWI-TAG Document 12 Filed 07/03/06 Page 2 of 2