Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01846/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01846-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO WOOTEN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1846 LKK KJM P

vs.

E. JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed October 27, 2005, plaintiff was ordered to file an affidavit in

support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his prison trust

account statement within thirty days, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 

On October 27, 2005, plaintiff also was served with a new case document form,

which has been returned to the court as undeliverable. It appears that petitioner has failed to

comply with Local Rule 83-182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona

inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

Case 2:05-cv-01846-LKK -KJM Document 6 Filed 12/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 16, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01846-LKK -KJM Document 6 Filed 12/16/05 Page 2 of 2