Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01979/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01979-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1634

ERIC ALAN SANDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION; MIKE 

CAMPBELL; SCOTT BECK; BARBARA CHEESEBORO; SUSAN BARDEN; 

EUGENIA HOLLMON; VALERIE DELLER; SHAWN DEBRUHL; GARY M. 

CANNON,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

AMY BRACY,

Defendant.

No. 19-1979

ERIC ALAN SANDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION; MIKE 

CAMPBELL; SCOTT BECK; BARBARA CHEESEBORO; SUSAN BARDEN; 

EUGENIA HOLLMON; VALERIE DELLER; SHAWN DEBRUHL; GARY M. 

CANNON,

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1979 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/20/2020 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Defendants - Appellees,

and

AMY BRACY,

Defendant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge; Paige Jones Gossett, Magistrate Judge. (0:18-cv02601-JMC-PJG)

Submitted: February 18, 2020 Decided: February 20, 2020

Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Alan Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1979 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/20/2020 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Eric Alan Sanders seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion for 

recusal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

orders Sanders seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or 

collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1979 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/20/2020 Pg: 3 of 3