Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00373/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00373-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ESCOBEDO,

Plaintiff,

v.

NICOLE SOLANO dba Chalio’s Fresno, et 

al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:24-cv-00373-KES-SKO

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DECLINING 

SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER

PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS 

(Doc. 9)

Plaintiff Jose Escobedo seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of Title III of the 

Americans with Disabilities Act, California’s Unruh Act, and California Health and Safety Code 

§§ 19955, 19959. See Doc. 1. Following an order to show cause regarding jurisdiction, the 

assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending the Court decline 

to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims and dismiss them without 

prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4). Doc. 9.

The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff on April 15, 2024, and

provide that any objections must be filed within 14 days of the date of service.

1

 Doc. 9 at 7. 

Plaintiff was informed that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in 

the waiver of rights on appeal.” Id. (citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 

2014)). No objections were filed, and the time to do so has expired. See Docket. 

1 Defendants have not yet appeared in the action. (See Docket.)

Case 1:24-cv-00373-KES-SKO Document 17 Filed 06/18/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court concludes the findings and 

recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court 

ORDERS:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on April 15, 2024, Doc. 9, are 

ADOPTED in full.

2. The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s 

claims arising under California’s Unruh Act and Cal. Health & Safety Code

§§ 19955 and 19959.

3. Plaintiff’s claims for violations of the Unruh Act and Cal. Health & Safety Code 

§ 19955 and § 19959 are DISMISSED without prejudice.

4. This matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 17, 2024 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:24-cv-00373-KES-SKO Document 17 Filed 06/18/24 Page 2 of 2