Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01331/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01331-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Richard Steven Riess, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 10-1331-PHX-RCB (ECV)

ORDER

Plaintiff Richard Steven Riess, who was then confined in the Durango Jail in Phoenix,

Arizona, filed a pro se motion for leave to exceed the page limit for his lodged Complaint,

which he brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1, 2.) In an Order filed July 27, 2010,

the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion with leave to file a complaint that substantially complied

with Instructions within 30 days. (Doc. 7.) In an Order filed July 27, 2010, Plaintiff was

granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and to file a complaint on the court-approved

form in compliance with the Instructions thereto within 30 days. (Id.) On September 9,

2010, this action was dismissed after Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 12.)

On March 4, 2011, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address reflecting that he is

now held at the Eloy Detention Center, in Eloy, Arizona. (Doc. 13.) In the notice, Plaintiff

asks that payment arrangements for this case be transferred to the Eloy Detention Center.

(Doc. 14.) The Court will deny Plaintiff’s request for two reasons. First, as stated in the

Court’s prior Order, a plaintiff “must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of

Case 2:10-cv-01331-RCB--ECV Document 15 Filed 03/17/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

change of address.” (Doc. 7 at 4.) Second, this action has been closed for almost six months.

Under these circumstances, Plaintiff’s request will be denied.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request that payment arrangements for the filing fee

in this matter be transferred to the Eloy Detention Center is denied. (Doc. 14.)

DATED this 17th day of March, 2011.

Case 2:10-cv-01331-RCB--ECV Document 15 Filed 03/17/11 Page 2 of 2