Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02861/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02861-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL ALI NOBLE-MUHAMMED,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2861 MCE EFB P

vs.

R. McCORD, et al., ORDER AND

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

 /

By order filed January 30, 2008, this court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial statement on

or before March 5, 2008. Plaintiff has not file his pretrial statement nor responded to the court's

order. 

On April 17, 2008, defendants filed notice that plaintiff has been released on parole but

has not apprised the court of his current address. A party appearing without counsel must keep

the court and all parties apprised of his current address. L.R. 83-183(b). 

In accordance with the above, it is hereby ORDERED that defendants are relieved of

their obligation to file a pretrial statement.

Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 11-110. 

/////

Case 2:06-cv-02861-MCE -EFB Document 18 Filed 04/29/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 29, 2008.

Case 2:06-cv-02861-MCE -EFB Document 18 Filed 04/29/08 Page 2 of 2