Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-91-01205/USCOURTS-ca10-91-01205-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

-

UNITED STATES COURT OF 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

ROBERT H. KETCHUM, a pseudonym ) 

for Kent C. Norman, ) 

) 

Plaintiff-Appellant, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

RICHARD R. THORNBURGH, Attorney ) 

General of the United States; ) 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) 

JUSTICE, ) 

) 

Defendants-Appellees. ) 

"'G' 1 L .... .J ,, 

APPEALS ,4 .J States eo~-. •:t t?f Appea, uni~ Tenth Cirt!Ult 

APR 2 Z 1993 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 91-1205 

(D. Colorado) 

(D.C. No. 91-F-862) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before SEYMOUR, ANDERSON, and EBEL, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. ~ Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered 

submitted without oral argument . 

Robert H. Ketchum (a pseudonym for Kent c. Norman) appeals 

the dismissal of his action brought against the Attorney General 

of the United States and the Department of Justice. 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel . 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 91-1205 Document: 010110212828 Date Filed: 04/22/1993 Page: 1 
Appellate Case: 91-1205 Document: 010110212828 Date Filed: 04/22/1993 Page: 2 
We have carefully reviewed the file in this case and conclude 

that, substantially for the reasons stated by the district court 

in its order of May 21, 1991, Mr. Ketchum's argument on appeal 

lacks any arguable basis in law. Accordingly, the judgment of the 

district court is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

-2-

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

Stephen H. Anderson 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 91-1205 Document: 010110212828 Date Filed: 04/22/1993 Page: 3 
.... Appellate Case: 91-1205 Document: 010110212828 Date Filed: 04/22/1993 Page: 4