Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-03-03955/USCOURTS-ca8-03-03955-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3955

___________

Maria Wortham, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Northern District of Iowa.

American Family Insurance Group; *

Dave Vore, *

*

Appellees, *

*

Bob Carnine, *

*

Defendant. *

___________

Submitted: September 23, 2004 

Filed: October 8, 2004

___________

Before WOLLMAN, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

RILEY, Circuit Judge.

Maria Wortham (Wortham), an insurance agent, appeals the district court’s1

adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment discrimination action.

Wortham claimed age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in

Appellate Case: 03-3955 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/08/2004 Entry ID: 1820000 
-2-

Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 623, and the Iowa Civil Rights Act (ICRA),

Iowa Code § 216.6; sex discrimination in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e,

and the ICRA; denial on the basis of her race (African-American) of the right to enjoy

the benefits of her contractual relationship with American Family, in violation of 42

U.S.C. § 1981; and race discrimination in violation of the ICRA. The district court

granted American Family summary judgment, concluding (1) Title VII does not

protect independent contractors, and Wortham admitted she was an independent

contractor; and (2) Wortham did not present sufficient evidence to create a genuine

issue as to discrimination.

We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. See

Jenkins v. S. Farm Bureau Cas., 307 F.3d 741, 743 (8th Cir. 2002). Because we

determine Wortham sufficiently disputed her employment status below, we analyze

whether she was an independent contractor under the multiple-factor test adopted by

this circuit. See Schwieger v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. of Neb., 207 F.3d 480, 483-84

(8th Cir. 2000) (applying non-exhaustive list of factors enumerated in Nationwide

Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden, 503 U.S. 318, 323-24 (1992)). 

We conclude, as a matter of law, the undisputed facts show Wortham was an

independent contractor because (1) Wortham is an insurance professional; (2) the

agent agreement signed by Wortham expressly identified her as an independent

contractor; (3) American Family did not supervise her day-to-day activities; (4)

Wortham worked out of an independent office, hired her assistants, and paid all

office-related expenses, including assistants’ salaries, rent, utilities, furniture, and

supplies; (5) Wortham was not subjected to any formal hour or leave policies; (6)

Wortham was paid exclusively by commission, did not receive employee benefits,

and was responsible for paying self-employment taxes; and (7) Wortham was free to

terminate her contract with American Family at will. See Lerohl v. Friends of Minn.

Sinfonia, 322 F.3d 486, 488 (8th Cir.) (issue whether workers were employees or

independent contractors is question of law which may properly be resolved by

summary judgment provided there is no genuine issue of material fact), cert denied,

Appellate Case: 03-3955 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/08/2004 Entry ID: 1820000 
-3-

124 S. Ct. 469 (2003); Schwieger, 207 F.3d at 484-86 (factors); see also Birchem v.

Knights of Columbus, 116 F.3d 310, 313 (8th Cir. 1997) (federal courts have

consistently found that insurance agents are independent contractors). While we

recognize some aspects of American Family’s relationship with Wortham were

consistent with employment, we conclude the overwhelming balance of factors

support the district court’s independent contractor determination. Id.

Independent contractor status is not protected under the ADEA, Title VII, or

the ICRA. Employees are protected under these acts. Thus, Wortham’s claims

brought pursuant to these statutes fail as a matter of law. See Schwieger, 207 F.3d

at 487 (Title VII); Jenkins, 307 F.3d at 742 (ADEA); Weary v. Cochran, 377 F.3d

522, 524 (6th Cir. 2004) (ADEA); Birchem, 116 F.3d at 314 (state law); Loeckle v.

State Farm Auto. Ins. Co., 59 F. Supp. 2d 838, 846 (N.D. Iowa 1999) (extending

federal-statute requirement of employee status to ICRA claim); aff’d, 210 F.3d 379

(8th Cir. 2000) (unpublished table decision). 

Wortham’s status as an independent contractor, however, does not preclude her

from pursuing a claim under section 1981. “Section 1981 does not limit itself, or

even refer, to employment contracts but embraces all contracts and therefore includes

contracts by which a[n] . . . independent contractor . . . provides service to another.”

Danco, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 178 F.3d 8, 14 (1st Cir. 1999). To establish a

prima facie case under section 1981, Wortham had to show (1) she is a member of a

racial minority; (2) American Family intended to discriminate against her on the basis

of race; and (3) the discrimination concerned an area enumerated in section 1981.

See Williams v. Lindenwood Univ., 288 F.3d 349, 355 (8th Cir. 2002). We agree

with the district court that Wortham presented insufficient evidence to support her

bare allegation of discrimination. The only evidence Wortham produced was an

unauthenticated list of transfers, which failed to identify the race of either the

transferors or the transferees. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e) (party opposing summary

judgment may not rest on allegations in pleadings, but must set forth specific facts

showing genuine issue for trial); Jeseritz v. Potter, 282 F.3d 542, 545-46 (8th Cir.

Appellate Case: 03-3955 Page: 3 Date Filed: 10/08/2004 Entry ID: 1820000 
-4-

2002) (party opposing summary judgment must point to evidence sufficient to raise

genuine issue for trial).

Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________

Appellate Case: 03-3955 Page: 4 Date Filed: 10/08/2004 Entry ID: 1820000