Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00334/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00334-59/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER GRANTING 

SAMSUNG AN EXTENSION TO RESPOND Case No. C 05-00334 RMW 

[All Parties listed on Signature Page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION 

RAMBUS INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX 

SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX 

SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 

AMERICA INC., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 

SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, 

L.P., 

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, 

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 

U.S.A., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 05 00334 RMW 

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG AN 

EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO 

RAMBUS’S REPLY TO SAMSUNG’S 

SECOND AMENDED ANSWER TO 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND 

COUNTERCLAIMS AND RAMBUS’S 

COUNTERCLAIMS IN REPLY 

Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

*E-FILED - 1/17/08*

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 1071 Filed 01/17/08 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER GRANTING 

SAMSUNG AN EXTENSION TO RESPOND

2 

Case No. C 05-00334 RMW 

Plaintiff Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Austin 

Semiconductor, L.P. (collectively “Samsung”) (“Parties”) hereby stipulate that Samsung is 

granted an extension to January 4, 2008 to respond to Rambus’s Reply to Samsung’s Second 

Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims and 

Rambus’s Counterclaims in Reply (“Response”). Samsung’s Response will not add any new 

allegations or claims to the allegations and claims contained in Samsung’s Second Amended 

Answer to First Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

Samsung is granted an extension to January 4, 2008 to respond to Rambus’s Reply to 

Samsung’s Second Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses and 

Counterclaims and Rambus’s Counterclaims in Reply. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: __1/17____________, 2008

 ______________________________ 

 Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 1071 Filed 01/17/08 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER GRANTING 

SAMSUNG AN EXTENSION TO RESPOND

3 

Case No. C 05-00334 RMW 

Dated: December 21, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

 MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

 By: /S/ Carolyn Luedtke 

Carolyn Luedtke 

Attorneys for RAMBUS INC. 

Dated: December 21, 2007 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

By: /S/ David J. Healey

David J. Healey 

Attorneys for 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., AND 

SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, 

L.P. 

Filer’s Attestation: 

 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulated Proposed Protective Order has 

been obtained from Carolyn Luedtke. 

Dated: December 21, 2007 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

By: /s/ Claire E. Goldstein 

 Claire E. Goldstein 

Attorneys for 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., AND 

SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, 

L.P. 

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 1071 Filed 01/17/08 Page 3 of 3