Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05751/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05751-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIMBERLY MARIE CURIEL, FREDERICK

MICHAEL CURIEL, MARIA THERESE CURIEL, a

minor, by and through her guardian ad litem Kimberly

Marie Curiel, TINA ALISIA CURIEL, a minor, by an

through her guardian ad litem Kimberly Marie Curiel,

JULIA MICHELLE CURIEL, a minor, by and through

her guardian ad litem Kimberly Marie Curiel, HAZEL

ANNE McCLURE, MICHAEL JASON SIKKEMA,

DAGAN ALEXANDER McCLURE-SIKKEMA, a

minor, by and through his guardian ad litem Hazel

Anne McClure, CELIA ROSE McCLURE-SIKKEMA,

a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem

Kimberly Marie Curiel,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CONTRA

COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT

SERGEANTS j. MAHONEY and K. DALY, sued in

their individual capacities and as employees of Contra

Costa County, CONTR COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT DETECTIVES JASON BARNES,

SHAWN PATE, CLARK CARY GOLBERG,

MOORE, UYEDA, AND VAN ZELF, sued in their

individual capacities and as employees of Contra Costa

County, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPUTIES ARANDA AND HADLEY, sued in their

individual capacities and as employees of Contra Costa

County, SHERIFF WARREN RUPF, CALIFORNIA

AND DOES ONE through ONE HUNDRED, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-05751 WHA

ORDER GRANTING IN

PART AND DENYING IN

PART PARTIES’ MOTION

TO CONTINUE DATES

FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND

DISCOVERY 

Case 3:06-cv-05751-WHA Document 35 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Parties’ motion to continue the hearing on defendants’ motion for summary judgment is

GRANTED. The hearing on that motion is continued to THURSDAY, AUGUST 2, 2007. 

Good cause not shown, parties’ motion to continue the deadlines for expert witness

disclosures and the expert discovery cutoff is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 29, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05751-WHA Document 35 Filed 05/29/07 Page 2 of 2