Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00133/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00133-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Paul Short and Barbara Short, a married 

couple, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

Chase Home Finance LLC; and John and 

Jane Doe, a married couple, 

Defendants.

No. CV-11-133-PHX-DGC

ORDER 

 

 Plaintiffs filed suit in December 2010. Doc. 1-1 at 4-22. More than two months 

ago, on April 8, 2011, Defendant Chase Home Finance LLC (“Chase”) filed a motion to 

dismiss the amended complaint. Doc. 10. Plaintiffs’ counsel, Devin Andrich, sought an 

extension of time to respond on the ground that he had miscalculated the response period. 

Doc. 11. The Court gave Plaintiffs until April 29, 2011 to file a response. Doc. 12. To 

date, no response has been filed. 

 Chase has filed a motion for summary ruling pursuant to Local Rule of Civil 

Procedure 7.2(i). Doc. 13. In response, Mr. Andrich states that due to computer 

problems in his office he was unable to electronically file a response to the motion to 

dismiss using this District’s ECF system, that he attempted to hand-file a response but it 

Case 2:11-cv-00133-DGC Document 15 Filed 06/14/11 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

was refused by the Clerk’s Office, and that he is in the process of replacing servers and 

reinstalling software programs in his office which will allow him to use the ECF system 

in the future. Doc. 14. Given these circumstances, Mr. Andrich requests leave to file a 

hardcopy of Plaintiffs’ response to the motion to dismiss. 

 The Court will grant the request and deny Chase’s motion for summary ruling. 

Mr. Andrich, by June 20, 2011, shall file with the Court and serve on Chase a hardcopy 

of Plaintiffs’ response brief. This is a one-time exception to the electronic filing 

requirement. All future documents shall be filed using the ECF system. 

IT IS ORDERED:

 1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file response (Doc. 14) is granted. 

Plaintiffs’ counsel shall have until June 20, 2011 to file with the Court and serve on 

Defendant a hardcopy of the response to the motion to dismiss. The Clerk is directed to 

accept the filing. All future documents shall be filed using the ECF system. 

 2. Defendant’s motion for summary ruling (Doc. 13) is denied. 

 Dated this 14th day of June, 2011. 

Case 2:11-cv-00133-DGC Document 15 Filed 06/14/11 Page 2 of 2