Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05659/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05659-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

JOINT STIP. EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

5:14-CV-05659-EJD

MATTHEW D. POWERS (S.B. #212682)

mpowers@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

MICHAEL MCSHANE (S.B. #127944) 

mmcshane@audetlaw.com 

JONAS P. MANN (S.B. #263314) 

AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP 

221 Main Street, Suite 1460 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 568-2555 

Facsimile: (415) 568-2556 

CHARLES J. LADUCA (to apply pro hac vice) 

charlesl@cuneolaw.com 

MATTHEW E. MILLER (to apply pro hac vice) 

mmiller@cuneolaw.com 

WILLIAM H. ANDERSON (to apply pro hac vice) 

wanderson@cuneolaw.com 

CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA LLP 

507 C Street, N.E. 

Washington, DC 20002 

Telephone: (202) 789-3960 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

PAUL ORSHAN & CHRISTOPHER ENDARA 

(Additional Counsel Listed in Signature Block)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

PAUL ORSHAN and CHRISTOPHER 

ENDARA, individually, and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

APPLE INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 5:14-CV-05659-EJD 

JOINT STIPULATION UNDER CIVIL 

L.R. 6-1(a) EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Complaint Filed: December 30, 2014 

Trial Date: None set UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward J. Davila

DATED: 2/18/2015

Case 5:14-cv-05659-EJD Document 13 Filed 02/18/15 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - 

JOINT STIP. EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

5:14-CV-05659-EJD

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Paul Orshan and Christopher Endara (“Plaintiffs”) filed their 

Complaint in the above-entitled action on December 30, 2014; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs served the summons and Complaint on Defendant Apple Inc. 

(“Defendant”) on January 2, 2015; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to a previous stipulation between the parties filed on January 21, 

2015 (Dkt. No. 6), Defendant’s response is currently due on or before February 23, 2015; 

WHEREAS, after the parties filed their previous stipulation extending Defendant’s time to 

respond to the Complaint, another action was filed in this district—Neocleous v. Apple Inc., Case 

No. 5:15-CV-EJD (filed February 3, 2015)—involving substantially similar claims as this case; 

WHEREAS, a third action—Jacobson v. Apple Inc. et al., C.D. Cal. Case No. 2:15-CV01099—involving substantially similar claims as in this case and Neocleous was filed in Los 

Angeles County Superior Court on February 10, 2015 and removed to the Central District of 

California on February 13, 2015; 

WHEREAS, all three actions—Orshan, Neocleous, and Jacobson—are putative class 

actions in which the plaintiffs (1) claim that Defendant misrepresented or omitted information 

about the storage capacity required for Apple’s iOS 8 operating system software, (2) seek 

certification of nearly identical classes or subclasses of purchasers, and (3) seek similar remedies 

under similar legal theories; 

WHEREAS, counsel for the Plaintiffs in this case have informed Defendant’s counsel that 

additional, similar actions may be filed in the next few weeks; 

WHEREAS, Defendant intends to move to transfer the Jacobson case from the Central 

District of California to this district; 

WHEREAS, Defendant intends to file motions to dismiss the complaints in all three 

Case 5:14-cv-05659-EJD Document 13 Filed 02/18/15 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 3 - 

JOINT STIP. EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

5:14-CV-05659-EJD

actions—Orshan, Neocleous, and Jacobson; 

WHEREAS, the parties in the two cases currently pending in this district—Orshan and

Neocleous—agree that the interests of judicial economy and efficiency are best served by 

extending Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned case so that the 

parties can finalize a single briefing and hearing schedule on the motions to dismiss in those two 

cases and in Jacobson (if the transfer of that case to this district is effected in time to permit a 

joint briefing and hearing schedule in all three cases); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel have agreed to extend the deadline by which Defendant 

must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned case by an additional 

thirty (30) days; 

WHEREAS, under this agreement, Defendant’s new deadline to answer or otherwise 

respond to the Complaint would be March 25, 2015; 

WHEREAS, this change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed 

by Court order; 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Local Civil Rules of the United 

States District Court for the Northern District of California, it is hereby stipulated by and among 

Plaintiffs and Defendant and through their counsel of record that Defendant shall have an 

additional thirty (30) days, until March 25, 2015, in which to answer or otherwise respond to the 

Complaint. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Case 5:14-cv-05659-EJD Document 13 Filed 02/18/15 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 4 - 

JOINT STIP. EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

5:14-CV-05659-EJD

Dated: February 17, 2015 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

MATTHEW D. POWERS 

By: /s/ Matthew D. Powers

 Matthew D. Powers 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

Dated: February 17, 2015 MICHAEL MCSHANE 

JONAS P. MANN 

AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP 

CHARLES J. LADUCA 

MATTHEW E. MILLER 

WILLIAM H. ANDERSON 

CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA LLP 

JON M. HERSKOWITZ 

BARON & HERSKOWITZ 

ROBERT SHELQUIST 

LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP 

By: /s/ Charles J. LaDuca 

 Charles J. LaDuca 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

PAUL ORSHAN & CHRISTOPHER 

ENDARA 

Case 5:14-cv-05659-EJD Document 13 Filed 02/18/15 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 5 - 

JOINT STIP. EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

5:14-CV-05659-EJD

ATTESTATION OF FILING 

 Pursuant to Local Rule 5.1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Matthew D. Powers, hereby attest 

that concurrence in the filing of this Joint Stipulation Under Civil L.R. 6-1(a) Extending 

Defendant’s Time to Respond to Complaint has been obtained from Charles J. LaDuca with 

conformed signatures above. 

Dated: February 17, 2015 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

MATTHEW D. POWERS 

By: /s/ Matthew D. Powers

 Matthew D. Powers 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

Case 5:14-cv-05659-EJD Document 13 Filed 02/18/15 Page 5 of 5