Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05122/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05122-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

Case Number C-05-5122 JF 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN: 71450) (kkeller@kksrr.com)

ANNE E. KEARNS (SBN: 183336) (akearns@kksrr.com)

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP

114 Sansome Street, 4

th

Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 249-8330

Facsimile: (415) 249-8333

Attorneys for Plaintiff BERCUT-VANDERVOORT

& CO.

KENNETH B. WILSON (SBN 130009) (kwilson@perkinscoie.com)

K.C. ALLAN (SBN 231866) (kallan@perkinscoie.com)

PERKINS COIE LLP

180 Townsend Street, Third Floor

San Francisco, CA 94107-1909

Telephone: (415) 344-7000

Facsimile: (415) 344-7050

Attorneys for Defendant MAISON TARRIDE

LEDROIT & CIE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

BERCUT-VANDERVOORT & CO., a

California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAISON TARRIDE LEDROIT & CIE, a

French company,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C-05-5122 JF

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION TO

DISMISS HEARING AND CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Date of initial hearings: May 5, 2006

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: The Honorable Jeremy Fogel

Courtroom: 3

**E-filed 5/3/06**

Case 5:05-cv-05122-JF Document 21 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

Case Number C-05-5122 JF 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil L.R., Rule16-2(e), Plaintiff BERCUT-VANDERVOORT & CO.

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant MAISON TARRIDE LEDROIT & CIE (“Defendant”) by and

through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate, effective upon order of the Court, as follows:

The Case Management Conference was initially scheduled for April 14, 2006 at 10:30 a.m.

in the above-referenced courtroom.

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is currently scheduled for May 5, 2006 at 9:00 a.m.

Because the Court was not available on April 14, 2006, on March 10, 2006, the parties

agreed, by stipulation and order to continue the Case Management Conference to May 5, 2006, the

same date at Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.

A personal obligation for Plaintiff’s lead counsel, Kenneth Keller, however, has since arisen

which conflicts with the May 5, 2006 hearing date.

The parties therefore agree and stipulate, upon order of the Court, to continue both the

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference from May 5, 2006 to May

26, 2006, at 9:00 a.m., the first available hearing date.

Dated: April 26, 2006 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILEY& ROMAN LLP

By:__________________/S/______________________

ANNE E. KEARNS

Attorneys for Plaintiff BERCUT-VANDERVOORT & CO.

Dated: April 26, 2006 PERKINS COIE LLP

By:__________________/S/______________________

K.C. ALLAN

Attorneys for Defendant MAISON TARRIDE LEDROIT & CIE

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Date: __________________________________

THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

72060

5/1/06

Case 5:05-cv-05122-JF Document 21 Filed 05/03/06 Page 2 of 2