Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01888/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01888-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD B. HATTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1888 GEB GGH PS

vs.

BANK OF AMERICA,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed September 12, 2006, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff

of the deficiencies in his complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not

filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the

reasons given in the September 12, 2006, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this

action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

Case 2:06-cv-01888-GEB-GGH Document 9 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 11/20/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

hatton.fta

Case 2:06-cv-01888-GEB-GGH Document 9 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 2