Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_15-cv-08124/USCOURTS-azd-3_15-cv-08124-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Algene Royce Gould,

 Petitioner,

vs.

Charles Ryan, et al.,

 Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-15-08124-PCT-PGR (MHB)

 ORDER 

 

Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Burns, filed August 12, 2016, notwithstanding that no objection to the Report

and Recommendation has been filed, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge

correctly concluded that the petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, should be denied. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) is accepted and

adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. §

2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is denied and that

this action is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability shall not be 

Case 3:15-cv-08124-PGR Document 22 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

- 2 -

issued and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied because the petitioner has

not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and because

the dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason

would not find the procedural ruling debatable.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment

accordingly.

DATED this 24th day of January, 2017.

Case 3:15-cv-08124-PGR Document 22 Filed 01/24/17 Page 2 of 2