Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00665/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00665-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES D.A. SMITH, No. 2:13-CV-0665-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under 

42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. 

Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 19) for an extension of time to file a

dispositive motion in this matter. Good cause appearing therefor, the motion is granted nunc pro

tunc to January 21, 2014, the date plaintiff filed his dispositive motion, which is considered

timely. 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

1

Case 2:13-cv-00665-CMK Document 21 Filed 02/05/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

A review of the docket reflects that defendant has notified the court regarding

consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, however, has not notified the court

regarding consent. Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order and Eastern District of California

Local Rules, Appendix A, the time to do so has now expired. 

Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why

this action should not be dismissed for failure to inform the court regarding consent to Magistrate

Judge jurisdiction, as required by the court’s scheduling order. The Clerk of the Court is directed

to serve on plaintiff a copy of the court’s form entitled “Consent to Assignment or Request for

Reassignment.” Plaintiff is warned that failure to respond to this order may result in the

dismissal of the action for the reasons discussed above, as well as for failure to prosecute and

comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 4, 2014

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:13-cv-00665-CMK Document 21 Filed 02/05/14 Page 2 of 2