Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00211/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00211-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

SIERRA NEVADA FOREST PROTECTION No. CIV-S-05-0205 MCE GGH 

CAMPAIGN, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL 

DIVERSITY, NATURAL RESOURCES CIV-S-05-0211 MCE GGH

DEFENSE COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB, CIV-S-05-0905 MCE GGH 

and THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, CIV-S-05-0953 MCE GGH 

non-profit organizations,

 (Related Cases)

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE

MARK REY, in his official

capacity as Under Secretary of

Agriculture, DALE BOSWORTH, in

his official capacity as Chief

of the United States Forest

Service, JACK BLACKWELL, in his

official capacity as Regional

Forester, Region 5, United

States Forest Service, and

JAMES M. PEÑA, in his official

capacity as Forest Supervisor,

Plumas National Forest, 

Defendants.

________________________________

and Related Cases.

----oo0oo----

Case 2:05-cv-00211-MCE-KJN Document 89 Filed 11/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

People of the State of California, ex rel. Bill Lockyer

(“California”), Plaintiff in one of the four related cases now

being adjudicated, seeks clarification of the Court’s October 26,

2005 Order re: Briefing Schedule. Specifically, California asks

whether the Court’s Order contemplates separate statements being

filed by Defendant-Intervenors in response to statements of

undisputed fact that will be submitted in support of motions for

summary judgment in these cases.

Defendant-Intervenors, as full parties to these cases, may,

should they choose to do so, separately respond to such

statements of undisputed fact. The parties moving for summary

judgment, in turn, may also separately respond to all such

opposition statements concurrently with their reply memoranda.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 29, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00211-MCE-KJN Document 89 Filed 11/29/05 Page 2 of 2