Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-00058/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-00058-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

INC.- Master File No. M-02-1486 PJH

GUIDO SAVERI (22349)

R. ALEXANDER SAVERI (173102)

GEOFFREY C. RUSHING (126910)

CADIO ZIRPOLI (179108)

SAVERI & SAVERI INC.

111 Pine Street, Suite 1700

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 217-6810

Facsimile: (415) 217-6813

guido@saveri.com

rick@saveri.com

STEVE W. BERMAN (pro hac vice)

ANTHONY D. SHAPIRO (pro hac vice)

CRAIG R. SPIEGEL (122000)

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

1301 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900

Seattle, WA 98101

Telephone: (206) 623-7292

Facsimile: (206) 623-0594

FRED TAYLOR ISQUITH (pro hac vice)

MARY JANE FAIT (pro hac vice)

WOLF, HALDENSTEIN, ADLER, 

 FREEMAN & HERZ

270 Madison Avenue

New York, NY 10016

Telephone: (212) 545-4600

Facsimile: (212) 545-4653

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS

MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

All Direct Purchaser Actions

MDL Docket No. M-02-1486–PJH

Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

Courtroom: 3

FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO 

DEFENDANT SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD. 

Case 4:03-cv-00058-PJH Document 10 Filed 08/10/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

INC.- Master File No. M-02-1486 PJH -1-

This matter has come before the Court to determine whether there is any cause why this Court

should not approve the settlement with Defendant Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. (“Defendant”)

set forth in the Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”), dated February 24, 2006, relating to the abovecaptioned litigation. The Court, after carefully considering all papers filed and proceedings held herein

and otherwise being fully informed in the premises, has determined (1) that the Settlement should be

approved, and (2) that there is no just reason for delay of the entry of this final judgment approving this

Agreement. Accordingly, the Court directs entry of Judgment which shall constitute a final adjudication

of this case on the merits as to the parties to the Agreement. Good cause appearing therefor, it is: 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

1. This Final Judgment of Dismissal as to Defendant Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd.,

is entered Nunc Pro Tunc as of November 1, 2006 with the Final Judgment of Dismissal as to Defendant

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. 

2. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this litigation, and all actions within 

this litigation and over the parties to the Agreement, including all members of the Class and the

Defendants.

3. The definitions of terms set forth in the Agreement are incorporated hereby as though

fully set forth in this Judgment.

4. The Court hereby finally approves and confirms the settlement set forth in the Agreement 

and finds that said settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate to the Class pursuant to

Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

5. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g), Class Counsel, previously appointed by the Court 

(Saveri & Saveri Inc., Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro Llp, Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz),

are appointed as Counsel for the Class. These firms have, and will fairly and competently represent the

interests of the Class. 

6. The persons/entities identified on Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Charlene Young filed

on 

October 16, 2006 have timely and validly requested exclusion from the Class and, therefore, are

excluded. Such persons/entities are not included in or bound by this Final Judgment. Such

Case 4:03-cv-00058-PJH Document 10 Filed 08/10/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

INC.- Master File No. M-02-1486 PJH -2-

persons/entities are not entitled to any recovery for the settlement proceeds obtained through this

settlement.

7. This Court hereby dismisses on the merits and with prejudice the Class Action in favor of 

Defendant, with each party to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

8. All persons and entities who are Releasing Persons are hereby barred and enjoined from 

commencing, prosecuting or continuing, either directly or indirectly, against the Released Persons, in

this or any other jurisdiction, any and all claims, causes of action or lawsuits, which they had, have, or in

the future may have, arising out of or related to any of the settled Claims as defined in the Agreement.

9. The Released Persons are hereby and forever released and discharged with respect to any 

and all claims or causes of action which the releasing Persons had or have arising out of or related to any

of the Settled Claims as defined in the Agreement. 

10. The notice given to the Class of the settlement set forth in the Agreement and the other 

matters set forth herein was the best notice practicable under the circumstances, including individual

notice to all members of the Class who could be identified through reasonable efforts. Said notice

provided due and adequate notice of those proceedings and of the maters set forth therein, including the

proposed settlement set forth in the Agreement, to all persons entitled to such notice, and said notice

fully satisfied the requirements of Rules 23(c)(2) and 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and

the requirements of due process. 

11. Three class members have objected to the settlements. All three objections have been

withdrawn.

12. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains 

continuing jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of this settlement and any distribution to Class

Members pursuant to further orders of this Court; (b) disposition of the Settlement Fund (c) hearing and

determining applications by the Representative Plaintiffs for attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, including

expert fees and costs, and interest; (d) the Class Action until the final judgment contemplate hereby

have become effective and each and every act agreed to be performed by the parties all have been

performed pursuant to the Agreement; (e) hearing and ruling on any matters relating to the plan of

allocation of settlement proceeds; and (f) all parties to the Class Actions and Releasing Persons for the

Case 4:03-cv-00058-PJH Document 10 Filed 08/10/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

INC.- Master File No. M-02-1486 PJH -3-

purpose of enforcing and administering the Agreement and Exhibits thereto and the mutual releases and

other documents contemplated by, or executed in connection with the Agreement.

13. In the event that the settlement does not become effective in accordance with the terms of 

the Agreement, then the judgment shall be rendered null and void and shall be vacated, and in such

event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null and void and the

parities shall be returned to their respective positions ex ante. 

14. The Court finds, pursuant to Rules 54(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

that this Final Judgment should be entered and further finds that there is no just reason for delay in the

entry of this Judgment, as a Final Judgment, as to the parties to the Agreement. Accordingly, the Clerk

is hereby directed to enter Judgment forthwith. 

Date: August___,2007. ____________________________________________

The Honorable Phillis J. Hamilton 

United States District Judge 

ram.639a.wpd

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:03-cv-00058-PJH Document 10 Filed 08/10/07 Page 4 of 4