Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03689/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-03689-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR 

FREESCALE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

 C-09-03689-JF-PVT 

Greg L. Lippetz (State Bar No. 154228) 

glippetz@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY 

Silicon Valley Office 

1755 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Telephone: 650-739-3939 

Facsimile: 650-739-3900 

John R. Colgan (IL Bar No. 6289249) 

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

jcolgan@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY 

77 W. Wacker Drive 

Chicago, IL 60601-1692 

Telephone: 312-782-3939 

Facsimile: 312-782-8585 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant 

FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ChipMOS Technologies, Inc., 

Defendant.

Case No. C-09-03689-JF-PVT 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR 

FREESCALE TO FILE ITS REPLY 

BRIEF 

Date: July 2, 2010 

Time: 09:00 a.m. 

Dept: 3, 5th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

Complaint filed: July 13, 2009 

Trial Date: Not Set 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, Plaintiff Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 

("Freescale”) and Defendant ChipMOS Technologies, Inc. ("ChipMOS") submit this Stipulation 

to Enlarge Time for Freescale to File its Reply Brief. 

------------------

Case 5:09-cv-03689-PSG Document 59 Filed 07/08/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR 

FREESCALE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

 C-09-03689-JF-PVT 

WHEREAS ChipMOS filed its Opposition to Freescale’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

on June 14, 2010; 

WHEREAS Freescale’s response is currently due on June 18, 2010; 

WHEREAS the parties stipulated to extend ChipMOS’ time to respond its Opposition to 

Freescale’s Motion for Summary Judgment from June 11, 2010 to June 14, 2010 to accommodate 

the filing of a third party declaration as long as copies of all other papers were delivered to 

Freescale on June 11, 2020. 

WHEREAS ChipMOS has agreed that Freescale can file its response on June 21, 2010; 

and 

WHEREAS the requested enlargement will not affect any other deadlines. 

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through their 

respective counsel of record, subject to the Court’s approval, that Freescale is permitted to file its 

Reply Brief on June 21, 2010. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 17, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Greg L. Lippetz Greg L. Lippetz 

 State Bar No. 154228 

 JONES DAY 

 1755 Embarcadero Road 

 Palo Alto, CA 94303 

 Telephone: 650-739-3939 

 Facsimile: 650-739-3900 

Counsel for Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim-Defendant 

FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. 

Case 5:09-cv-03689-PSG Document 59 Filed 07/08/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 - 

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR 

FREESCALE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

 C-09-03689-JF-PVT 

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the above signatory attests that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. 

Dated: June 17, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY 

 & WALKER LLP 

RONALD S. LEMIEUX 

SHANEE Y.W. NELSON 

KAREN HU 

By: /s/ Shanee Y.W. Nelson

 SHANEE Y.W. NELSON 

 

Counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

ChipMOS Technologies, Inc. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the stipulation above, Freescale’s deadline to file its Reply Brief is extended to 

June 21, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ___________________, 2010 

 Hon. Jeremy Fogel, U.S. District Judge 

7/2

------------------

Case 5:09-cv-03689-PSG Document 59 Filed 07/08/10 Page 3 of 3