Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01588/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01588-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

Page 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP 

John A. Lavra, CSB No.: 114533 

Amanda L. McDermott, CSB No.: 253651 

3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 

Sacramento, CA 95864 

Phone: 916-974-8500 

Facsimile: 916-974-8510 

Attorneys for Defendants 

County of Sacramento; 

Stephanie Lynch; 

Michelle Callejas; 

Debra Williams; 

Renae Rodocker; 

Luis Villa; and 

Craig Larkin 

LEIGH LAW GROUP 

Jay T. Jambeck SBN #226018 

Mandy G. Leigh SBN # 225748 

870 Market Street, Suite 1157 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Telephone: 415-399-9155 

Facsimile: 415-795-3733 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

A.P. (a minor); Robin Mammen 

and Larry Mammen individually 

and as Guardian Ad Litem 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

A.P. (a minor); ROBIN MAMMEN and 

LARRY MAMMEN individually and as 

Guardian ad Litem for A.P., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING, 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, STEPHANIE 

LYNCH, LUIS VILLA; MICHELLE 

CALLEJAS, DEBRA WILLIAMS, CRAIG 

LARKIN, RENAE RODOCKER, 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: 2:13-cv-01588-JAM-AC 

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER 

TO MODIFY THE PRETRIAL 

SCHEDULING ORDER

Case 2:13-cv-01588-JAM-DB Document 63 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 3
AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

Page 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective attorneys and subject to 

the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the following modifications 

and/or amendments to this Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order dated November 24, 2014 [ECF 

No. 60]: 

 That the expert witness disclosure deadline, currently set for April 15, 2016, be moved to 

July 15, 2016; 

 That the supplemental expert witness disclosure deadline, currently set for April 29, 

2016, be moved to July 29, 2016; 

 That the deadline for all discovery (expert and non-expert) to be completed, currently set 

for June 15, 2016, be moved to September 16, 2016; 

 That the deadline for filing dispositive motions, currently set for July 27, 2016, be moved 

to October 18, 2016; 

 That the deadline for hearing on dispositive motions, currently set for August 24, 2016, 

be moved to November 15, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.; 

 That the deadline for filing the Joint Pretrial Statement be set for January 6, 2017; 

 That the Final Pretrial Conference, currently set for September 30, 2016, be moved to 

January 13, 2017, at 11:00 a.m.; and 

 That the Trial, currently set for November 7, 2016, be moved to February 13, 2017, at 

9:00 a.m. 

 WHEREAS, counsel for all parties have met and discussed the posture of this case, and 

agree that it would be in the interests of justice and judicial economy and that good causes exists 

for a modification of the scheduling order; 

 WHEREAS, the parties, through written discovery and meet and confer efforts, have 

determined that the relevant documents in this matter are in excess of 2,000 pages, and that due 

to the number of parties and witnesses there will be a significant number of necessary 

depositions; 

WHEREAS, due to the nature of the claims in this matter the parties are likely to require 

the services of one or more experts, who will need to review significant records in order to 

Case 2:13-cv-01588-JAM-DB Document 63 Filed 01/21/16 Page 2 of 3
AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 

Page 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

prepare their reports as required by FRCP 26; 

WHEREAS, the parties would like to complete written discovery and depositions related 

to non-expert witnesses prior to disclosure of experts; 

WHEREAS, this stipulation and proposed order is based on the need for additional time 

to conduct the above mentioned discovery, complete written discovery, and file pretrial motions; 

WHEREAS, this request is not being made for the purpose of delay, or any other 

improper purpose; 

WHEREAS, continuing the trial date and pretrial deadlines will not prejudice any party 

or their counsel; and 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between the parties 

that this Court modifies the pretrial deadlines and trial date as set forth above. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 20, 2016 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP 

 By: /s/ Amanda L. McDermott JOHN A. LAVRA 

AMANDA L. MCDERMOTT 

Dated: January 20, 2016 LEIGH LAW GROUP 

/s/ Jay T. Jambeck

 By: JAY T. JAMBECK 

MANDY G. LEIGH 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _1/20/2016_________________ /s/ John A. Mendez

JOHN A. MENDEZ 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:13-cv-01588-JAM-DB Document 63 Filed 01/21/16 Page 3 of 3