Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-08449/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-08449-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL DOMINO,

Plaintiff,

v.

KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-08449-HSG 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 

MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE

Re: Dkt. No. 14

On January 31, 2020, Plaintiff Michael Domino, pro se, filed the pending motion to change 

venue from the Oakland Division of the Northern District of California to the San Francisco 

Division. Dkt. No. 14. 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 3-2(d), “all civil actions which arise in the 

counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo or Sonoma shall be 

assigned to the San Francisco Division or the Oakland Division.” This case was properly assigned 

according to this rule. Plaintiff provides no reason for the requested change outside of an apparent 

“inconvenien[ce] . . . to travel from San Francisco, CA to Oakland.” Dkt. No. 14. This fails to 

show that “the interests of justice will be served” by such a transfer. L.R. 3-2(h). Accordingly, 

the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to change venue. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 2/5/2020

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

1 The Court finds the application appropriate for disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 

7-1(b).

Case 4:19-cv-08449-HSG Document 15 Filed 02/05/20 Page 1 of 1