Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05338/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05338-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAMIRO NAVARRO HERNANDEZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

1:04-hc-05338-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 11)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

On February 24, 2004, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 1). On

January 4, 2005, this Court issued an order requiring Petitioner, within thirty (30) days of service of

the order, to file an amended petition that names the proper respondent and clarifies the nature of the

federal claims Petitioner wishes to assert. (Doc. 10). Petitioner did not respond to this order. On

March 28, 2005, the Court issued a Report and Recommendation that the Petition be dismissed for

Petitioner’s failure to comply with the Court’s order of January 4, 2005. (Doc. 11). To date, the

parties have not filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.

///

///

Case 1:04-cv-05338-AWI -SMS Document 12 Filed 05/11/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed March 28, 2005 (Court Doc. 11) is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05338-AWI -SMS Document 12 Filed 05/11/05 Page 2 of 2