Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05025/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05025-46/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLORIA GRENING WOLK,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PHILIP R. GREEN,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-5025 BZ

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to

file a motion for reconsideration regarding this court’s order

denying her motion for summary judgment/summary adjudication

is DENIED. The court denied plaintiff’s motion to strike

without further briefing or argument because the motion, for

the most part, involved her attacking the affirmative defenses

as being factually insufficient based on her affidavit and

defendant’s discovery responses. When denying the motion to

strike, the court noted her arguments that certain facts could

not support the affirmatives defense should be presented as a

motion for summary judgment. When plaintiff filed her motion

for summary judgment, she did not attack the legal sufficiency

Case 3:06-cv-05025-BZ Document 196 Filed 03/31/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

of many of the affirmative defenses. 

During pre-trial, plaintiff will be given an opportunity

to challenge the legal sufficiency of any affirmative defense

as to which defendant seeks jury instructions. 

Dated: March 31, 2008

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\WOLK\ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION .wpd

Case 3:06-cv-05025-BZ Document 196 Filed 03/31/08 Page 2 of 2