Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01612/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01612-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:7413(b) Clean Air Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MATTHEW B. HIPPLER (Cal. Bar No. 212036) 

HOLLAND & HART LLP 

5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor 

Reno, NV 89511

Tel: (775) 327-3000

Fax: (775) 786-6179

mbhippler@hollandhart.com

STEVEN G. JONES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

EMILY C. SCHILLING (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

HOLLAND & HART LLP 

222 So. Main Street, Suite 2200 

Salt Lake City, UT 84101 

Tel: (801) 799-5800 

Fax: (801) 799-5700 

sgjones@hollandhart.com 

ecschilling@hollandhart.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLOBAL COMMUNITY MONITOR, a 

California nonprofit corporation; 

LABORERS’ INTERNATIONAL 

UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 

UNION NO. 783, an organized labor 

union; RANDAL SIPES, JR., an 

individual; RUSSEL COVINGTON, an 

individual; 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MAMMOTH PACIFIC, L.P., a California 

Limited Partnership; ORMAT NEVADA, 

INC., a Delaware Corporation; ORMAT 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware 

Corporation; and DOES I-X, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN 

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING 

REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS 

Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr.

HOLLAND 

&

HART LLP

222 SO. MAIN STREET, SUITE 2200 

SALT 

LAKE 

CITY, UTAH 84101 

Case 2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN Document 74 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING MODIFIED BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS - 2 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

HOLLAND 

&

HART LLP

222 SO. MAIN STREET, SUITE 2200 

SALT 

LAKE 

CITY, UTAH 84101 

 RECITALS 

1. On June 20, 2016, the Court signed a Stipulation and Order (Dkt. No. 63) setting briefing 

schedules for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Their Complaint and the parties’ Dispositive 

Motions. 

2. That Stipulation and Order provided that, in the event the Court issued a decision on the 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint after August 5, 2016, the briefing schedule 

for the parties’ Dispositive Motions would be extended by the number of days between August 5, 2016 

and the date of the Court’s decision, and that the parties’ Dispositive Motions would be noted for the 

next available hearing date on the Court’s calendar. See Dkt. No. 63 at 3:17-22. 

3. The Court issued a Memorandum and Order denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File 

Amended Complaint on August 11, 2016. (Dkt No. 70). 

STIPULATION 

Applying on the terms of the Court’s June 20, 2016 Order, and extending the schedule by a 

week based on the date the Court issued its Memorandum and Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Leave to File Amended Complaint, the schedule for the Parties’ Dispositive Motions is amended as 

follows: 

August 18, 2016: Initial dispositive motions filed; 

September 8, 2016: Opposition briefs and any cross-motions due; 

September 22, 2016: Reply briefs and opposition to cross-motions due; 

October 6, 2016: Reply briefs on cross-motions (if any) due; 

October 20, 2016: Hearing on dispositive motions and cross-motions (if any). 

 

Case 2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN Document 74 Filed 08/17/16 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING MODIFIED BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS - 3 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

HOLLAND 

&

HART LLP

222 SO. MAIN STREET, SUITE 2200 

SALT 

LAKE 

CITY, UTAH 84101 

So Stipulated this 17th day of August, 2016: 

HOLLAND & HART LLP 

s/ Steven G. Jones 

MATTHEW HIPPLER 

STEVEN G. JONES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

EMILY C. SCHILLING (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LOZEAU | DRURY 

s/ Meredith Wilensky 

RICHARD DRURY 

DOUGLAS CHERMAK 

MEREDITH WILENSKY 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ORDER 

Based on the parties’ Stipulation as outlined above, the Court enters the following Order: 

1. The Court modifies the briefing schedule for the parties’ Dispositive Motions as follows: 

August 18, 2016: Initial dispositive motions filed; 

September 8, 2016: Opposition briefs and any cross-motions due; 

September 22, 2016: Reply briefs and opposition to cross-motions due; 

October 6, 2016: Reply briefs on cross-motions (if any) due; 

October 20, 2016: Hearing on dispositive motions and cross-motions (if any). 

2. Apart from the modification of the briefing schedule on the parties’ Dispositive Motions 

outlined above, all other deadlines established in the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt No. 31) 

remain in effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 17, 2016 

Case 2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN Document 74 Filed 08/17/16 Page 3 of 3