Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01134/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01134-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IMC INVESTMENT GROUP FE WINERY, 

LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FAIRWINDS ESTATE, LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-01134-JSW 

ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENT 

TO CASE MANAGEMENT 

STATEMENT 

Re: Dkt. No. 83 

The Court has reviewed the parties’ case management statement. No later than Thursday, 

June 9, at 2:00 p.m., the parties shall submit a supplemental joint case management statement 

containing a revised proposed schedule that addresses the following issues: 

Section 5 of the case management statement requests a deadline to file amended pleadings 

“no earlier than October 2016.” Section 17 of the case management statement anticipates that the 

parties “will be ready for trial by January 9, 2017” and requests a November 4, 2016 deadline to 

designate experts and to provide expert reports. Do the parties anticipate that the amendment of 

pleadings will result in any further motions practice, or are the pretrial and trial dates realistic 

despite the requested deadline for amendment of pleadings? 

Section 17 of the case management statement does not include a proposed expert discovery 

cut-off. What is the parties’ requested expert discovery cut-off? 

Section 17 of the case management statement proposes that dispositive motions be heard 

“by December 5, 2016.” The Court is available on Friday, December 2, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. Do the 

parties request a dispositive motions hearing on this date even though it is before the proposed 

date of December 5, 2016 for designation of rebuttal experts and disclosure of rebuttal expert 

reports? 

Case 4:16-cv-01134-JSW Document 84 Filed 06/08/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

or i

Sec

Som

ma

the

mo

Gu

tria

pre

con

rev

sta

Da

Section

interpretatio

ction 18 of th

me claims ar

ay be tried to

ese issues. T

otion, bench 

Before 

uidelines for 

als, and take 

etrial filings.

nference on 

view the Sch

The par

tement. See

IT IS S

ated: June 8, 

n 15 of the ca

on may need 

he case man

re equitable 

o the Court.”

The parties sh

trial, or jury

proposing th

Trial and Fi

note of the d

 The parties

a Monday, a

heduling Not

rties shall m

e N.D. Cal. C

SO ORDER

2016 

ase managem

to be determ

nagement sta

(removal of

” The revise

hall explain 

y trial. 

heir revised 

inal Pretrial C

dates for exc

s shall also t

at 2:00 p.m., 

tes for the un

eet and conf

Civil L.R. 1-

RED. 

2

ment stateme

mined prior t

atement state

f manager, re

d proposed s

which issue

schedule, th

Conference 

change of m

ake note tha

fourteen da

ndersigned o

fer prior to th

5(n). 

ent states: “I

to determina

es: “The part

escission, de

schedule sha

s shall be pr

he parties sha

in Civil Cas

motions in lim

at this Court 

ays before th

on the Court’

he filing of t

JE

Un

Issues related

ation of dama

ties have eac

eclaratory rel

all propose a

resented at w

all carefully 

ses, both for 

mine, opposi

generally ho

he first day o

’s website. 

the suppleme

EFFREY S. W

nited States D

d to contract

ages or othe

ch demanded

lief, account

a plan for dis

which time, w

review the C

bench trials 

tions thereto

olds the pretr

f trial. The p

ental case m

WHITE 

District Judg

t rescission 

r remedies.”

d a jury trial.

ting) and 

sposition of 

whether by 

Court’s 

and jury 

o, and other 

rial 

parties shall

management 

ge 

” 

.

Case 4:16-cv-01134-JSW Document 84 Filed 06/08/16 Page 2 of 2