Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03418/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03418-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

---

- 1 -

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING RESPONSIVE MOTIONS 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03418-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MAYER BROWN LLP 

DONALD M. FALK (SBN 150256) 

dfalk@mayerbrown.com 

ELSPETH V. HANSEN (SBN 292193) 

ehansen@mayerbrown.com 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 

Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC 

LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 

BERNSTEIN LLP 

MICHAEL W. SOBOL (SBN 194857) 

ROGER N. HELLER (SBN 215348) 

NICOLE D. SUGNET (SBN 246255) 

275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 956-1000 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARCUS A. ROBERTS, KENNETH A. 

CHEWEY AND ASHLEY M. CHEWEY, on 

behalf of themselves and all others similarly 

situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03418-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SETTING DEADLINES FOR 

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AND SETTING 

SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING 

RESPONSIVE MOTIONS 

Complaint Filed: July 24, 2015 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

Plaintiffs Marcus A. Roberts, Kenneth A. Chewey, and Ashley M. Chewey (“Plaintiffs”), 

and Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through 

their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

Case 3:15-cv-03418-EMC Document 12 Filed 09/03/15 Page 1 of 3
 

- 2 -

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING RESPONSIVE MOTIONS 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03418-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS the Complaint in the above-captioned action was filed by Plaintiffs on July 

24, 2015; 

WHEREAS the above-captioned action was deemed related to 14-cv-4785-EMC and 

assigned to this Court on August 6, 2015; 

WHEREAS Plaintiffs intend to file an amended complaint on September 3, 2015; 

WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s counsel require additional time beyond the dates 

provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Northern District of 

California to brief Defendant’s anticipated motion to compel arbitration in response to Plaintiffs’ 

Amended Complaint; 

THEREFORE, the Parties jointly request that the Court set the following schedule for 

filing the Amended Complaint and briefing the motion to compel arbitration: 

Deadline for Plaintiffs to file an Amended Complaint September 3, 2015 

Deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise 

respond to the Amended Complaint, including by 

moving to compel arbitration 

November 2, 2015 

Deadline for Plaintiffs to file an Opposition to any 

responsive motion filed by Defendant (such as a 

motion to compel arbitration) 

January 4, 2016 

Deadline for Defendant to file a reply in support of 

any responsive motion filed by Defendant (such as a 

motion to compel arbitration) 

February 3, 2016 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: September 2, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 

 MAYER BROWN LLP 

Case 3:15-cv-03418-EMC Document 12 Filed 09/03/15 Page 2 of 3
 

- 3 -

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING RESPONSIVE MOTIONS 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03418-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 By: s/Donald M. Falk 

 

 DONALD M. FALK 

 Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC 

 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 

 BERNSTEIN, LLP 

 By: s/Nicole D. Sugnet 

 

 NICOLE D. SUGNET 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Donald M. Falk, attest under penalty of perjury that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories. 

 s/Donald M. Falk 

 Donald M. Falk 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________________ __________________________________________ 

 HON. EDWARD M. CHEN 

 United States District Judge 

9/3/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-03418-EMC Document 12 Filed 09/03/15 Page 3 of 3