Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-00114/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-00114-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Craig R Brittain, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Twitter Incorporated, 

Defendant. 

No. CV18-01714-PHX-DGC 

ORDER 

The Court will grant Defendant’s request for a 30-day extension of its answer 

deadline and its MIDP response deadline. The Court concludes that this extension is 

warranted in light of Defendant’s pending motion to transfer this case to the Northern 

District of California. Defendant’s answer date will be extended to January 10, 2019. 

Defendant’s MIDP response date will be extended to February 8, 2019. 

In light of this ruling, the Court will also deny Plaintiff’s motion for contempt. 

Doc. 38. Defendant has not violated its obligation to provide MIDP responses or other 

discovery. 

The Court will vacate the Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 

December 13, 2018 at 4:30 p.m. and will reset the Case Management Conference, if 

necessary, after the Court has had an opportunity to rule on Defendant’s pending motion 

to transfer. Doc. 22. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. Defendant’s motion to extend (Doc. 34) is granted as set forth above. 

Case 4:19-cv-00114-YGR Document 42 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2. Plaintiff’s motion for contempt (Doc. 38) is denied.

3. The Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for December 13, 2018 at 

4:30 p.m. is vacated.

Dated this 7th day of December, 2018. 

Case 4:19-cv-00114-YGR Document 42 Filed 12/10/18 Page 2 of 2