Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-00760/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-00760-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Conversion

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION RE ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON 

PATRICK J. FOLAN (STATE BAR #125340)

STEVEN W. BRENNAN (STATE BAR #110256)

ST. JOHN, WALLACE, BRENNAN & FOLAN LLP

21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 1120

Torrance, California 90503-6504

Telephone: (310) 792-1075

Facsimile: (310) 792-0635

E-mail: pjfolan@swbf.net

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Morgan Stanley DW Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND

Morgan Stanley DW Inc., 

a corporation, 

Plaintiff,

v.

Rosemary Johnson, an individual,

Defendant.

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CV07-00760 CW

Assigned to Hon. Claudia Wilken 

Courtroom 2

STIPULATION RE ENTRY OF

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

ORDER THEREON 

STIPULATION

Plaintiff Morgan Stanley DW Inc. (“Morgan Stanley”) and defendant Rosemary Johnson

(“Johnson” or “Defendant”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

1. The parties hereby agree to the Court’s entry of the following preliminary

injunction: 

Case 4:07-cv-00760-CW Document 12 Filed 02/08/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION RE ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON 

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Based on the parties’ Stipulation above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED

THAT: 

A. A preliminary injunction shall be issued immediately. Defendant is hereby enjoined

and restrained, directly or indirectly, whether acting alone or in concert with others, including any

officer, agent, representative, and/or employee of Defendant’s new employer, Cochrane &

Associates, from:

1. Soliciting any business from any client or customer whom Defendant served

as a sales assistant during her employment with Morgan Stanley, or any other customer or

client of Morgan Stanley whose name became known to Defendant while in the employ of

Morgan Stanley; 

2. Contacting for business purposes, whether in person, through others, by

telephone or in writing, any client or customer of Morgan Stanley whom Defendant served

as a sales assistant during her employment with Morgan Stanley or whose name became

known to Defendant while employed by Morgan Stanley; and

3. Using, disclosing, or transmitting for any purpose (including but not limited

to the solicitation of said clients or customers), any information contained in the records of

Morgan Stanley, including but not limited to the names, addresses, and financial information

of said clients or customers.

B. Within 48 hours of entry of this Order by the Court, Defendant is hereby required to

return to Morgan Stanley’s counsel, Patrick J. Folan, all originals, copies, or other reproductions,

in any form whatsoever, of any document or other form of recorded Morgan Stanley information,

and to purge and destroy any computerized record of Morgan Stanley that is within Defendant’s

possession, custody or control. 

C. In view of the nature of the controversy and Morgan Stanley's financial condition,

a bond is deemed to be unnecessary. 

This Order shall remain in full force and effect until April 8, 2007. 

Case 4:07-cv-00760-CW Document 12 Filed 02/08/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION RE ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON 

DATED: February 7, 2007 ST. JOHN, WALLACE, BRENNAN

& FOLAN LLP

By:___________________________________

Patrick J. Folan (State Bar #125340)

Attorneys for Plaintiff Morgan Stanley DW Inc.

DATED: February 7, 2007 STEEFEL LEVITT & WEISS

By:___________________________________

Michael D. Early (State Bar #111459)

Attorneys for Defendant Rosemary Johnson 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

2/8/07

Dated:___________________ ___________________________________

Hon. Claudia Wilken 

United States District Court Judge

Case 4:07-cv-00760-CW Document 12 Filed 02/08/07 Page 3 of 3