Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05449/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05449-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLS.’ OPP’N TO & DEF.’S REPLY

ISO DEF.’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION - CASE NO. 14- CV-05449 TEH

560198.2 

Laura L. Ho (SBN 173179) 

lho@gbdhlegal.com

Byron Goldstein (SBN 289306)

brgoldstein@gbdhlegal.com

GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO 

300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Tel: (510) 763-9800 

Fax: (510) 835-1417 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Additional counsel listed on signature page 

JoAnna L. Brooks 

JBrooks@littler.com

Andrew M. Spurchise

ASpurchise@littler.com 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

650 California Street, 20th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108-2693 

Tel: (415) 433-1940 

Fax: (415) 399-8490 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Additional Counsel listed on signature page 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GRETA ZENELAJ AND VILMA ZENELAJ, 

on behalf of themselves and all others similarly 

situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Handybook, Inc., 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: 14-cv-05449 TEH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO AND 

DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

ARBITRATION 

Hon. Thelton E. Henderson

Case 4:14-cv-05449-HSG Document 14 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLS.’ OPP’N TO & DEF.’S REPLY

ISO DEF.’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION - CASE NO. 14- CV-05449 TEH

560198.2 

PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT, BY COUNSEL, STIPULATE AND AGREE AS 

FOLLOWS: 

1. Defendant filed a motion to compel arbitration on December 22, 2014. ECF 8. 

Plaintiffs’ opposition is currently due on January 5, 2015, and Defendant’s reply is currently due on 

January 12, 2015. ECF 8 and 11. At this time, there is no scheduled hearing for the motion to compel 

arbitration because the scheduled hearing date was vacated. ECF 11. 

2. The parties have met and agreed to an extension of time for both Plaintiffs’ opposition 

to and Defendant’s reply in support of Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. The parties stipulate 

that Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration shall be due on January 15, 

2015. It is further stipulated that Defendant’s reply in support of its motion to compel arbitration shall 

be due on January 26, 2015.

3. The parties have also met and agreed to request a motion hearing date of February 23, 

2015 for Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration.

Dated: December 29, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 

 /S/ Byron Goldstein 

Laura L. Ho (SBN 173179) 

lho@gbdhlegal.com

Byron Goldstein (SBN 289306) 

brgoldstein@gbdhlegal.com

GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO 

300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Tel: (510) 763-9800 

Fax: (510) 835-1417

 David Browne (SBN 261345) 

david@brownelaborlaw.com

Devin Coyle (SBN 267194) 

dcoyle@workerscounsel.com

BROWNE LABOR LAW 

475 Washington Blvd. 

Marina del Rey, CA 90291 

Tel: (760) 994-7668 

Fax: (310) 421-4833

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 4:14-cv-05449-HSG Document 14 Filed 01/05/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLS.’ OPP’N TO & DEF.’S REPLY

ISO DEF.’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION - CASE NO. 14- CV-05449 TEH

560198.2 

Dated: December 29, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 

 /S/ Andrew M. Spurchise 

JoAnna L. Brooks 

JBrooks@littler.com

Andrew M. Spurchise

ASpurchise@littler.com 

Mel M.C. Cole 

mmcole@littler.com 

Roxanna F. Iran 

RIran@littler.com 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

650 California Street, 20th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108-2693 

Tel: (415) 433-1940 

Fax: (415) 399-8490

 Attorneys for Defendant

ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has 

been obtained from each of the other signatories. 

Dated: December 29, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 

 /S/ Byron Goldstein 

Byron Goldstein 

GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 4:14-cv-05449-HSG Document 14 Filed 01/05/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLS.’ OPP’N TO & DEF.’S REPLY

ISO DEF.’S MOT. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION - CASE NO. 14- CV-05449 TEH

560198.2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to 

Compel Arbitration, ECF 8, is due on January 15, 2015 and Defendant’s Reply in support of its Motion 

to Compel Arbitration is due on January 26, 2015.

The motion hearing date for Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration is scheduled for 

February 23, 2015.

Dated: _______________, 2015 

Honorable Thelton E. Henderson 

United States District Court Judge 

01/05

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 4:14-cv-05449-HSG Document 14 Filed 01/05/15 Page 4 of 4