Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00072/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00072-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY DALE BARGER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CDCR, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-0072 GEB KJN P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed April 23, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 

file an amended complaint was granted. (See ECF No. 27.) More than forty-five days from that 

date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded 

to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

Case 2:15-cv-00072-GEB-KJN Document 28 Filed 06/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: June 9, 2015

/barg0072.fta

Case 2:15-cv-00072-GEB-KJN Document 28 Filed 06/09/15 Page 2 of 2