Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965-56/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ATOPTECH, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. CV-13-2965 MMC

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Before the Court is defendant ATopTech’s Administrative Motion for an Extension,

by which defendant seeks an order allowing it to defer the filing of its Third Amended

Answer and Counterclaims until after the Court has ruled on plaintiff Synopsys’s pending

Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. On August 27, 2015, plaintiff

timely filed its opposition to defendant’s Administrative Motion. Having read and considered

the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the instant motion, the Court, in the

interest of judicial economy, finds it preferable to grant the relief requested, to avoid the

potential need for the filing and review of a Fourth Amended Answer and Counterclaims. 

Accordingly, AtopTech’s Administrative Motion is hereby GRANTED. ATopTech

shall file its Third Amended Answer and Counterclaims by September 18, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 27, 2015 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 356 Filed 08/27/15 Page 1 of 1