Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03435/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03435-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH B. POLLARD, III,

Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-3435 JAM KJN P

vs.

SHASTA SUPERIOR COURT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER & 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel, seeks relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 16, 2010, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations

that this action should be dismissed and plaintiff’s requests for injunctive relief and his motion

for removal be denied. Plaintiff was granted twenty-one days to file objections.

On March 18, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss his action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the February 16, 2010 findings and

recommendations (Dkt. No. 14) are vacated.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) be

granted and this action be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyCase 2:09-cv-03435-JAM-KJN Document 16 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: April 6, 2010

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

poll3435.dis

Case 2:09-cv-03435-JAM-KJN Document 16 Filed 04/08/10 Page 2 of 2