Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca2-13-00999/USCOURTS-ca2-13-00999-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

13-981-L

Turkmen v. Hasty

1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

2

3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

4

5 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals

6 for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United

7 States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York,

on the 11th 8 day of December, two thousand fifteen.

9

10 PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS,

11 JOSÉ A. CABRANES,

12 ROSEMARY S. POOLER,

13 REENA RAGGI,

14 RICHARD C. WESLEY,

15 PETER W. HALL,

16 DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON,

17 GERARD E. LYNCH,

18 DENNY CHIN,

19 RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,

20 SUSAN L. CARNEY,

21 CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY,

Circuit Judges.1 22

23

24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

25

26 IBRAHIM TURKMEN, AKHIL SACHDEVA, AHMER

27 IQBAL ABBASI, ANSER MEHMOOD, BENAMAR

28 BENATTA, AHMED KHALIFA, SAEED HAMMOUDA,

29 PURNA BAJRACHARYA, on behalf of

30 themselves and all others similarly

31 situated,

32

33 Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross- 13-981 (L)

34 Appellants, 13-999 (Con)

35 13-1002 (Con)

36 - v.- 13-1003 (Con)

37 13-1662 (XAP)

 1 Robert A. Katzmann, Chief Judge, took no part in

the consideration or decision of this case.

Case 13-999, Document 272, 12/11/2015, 1661595, Page1 of 3
1 DENNIS HASTY, former Warden of the

2 Metropolitan Detention Center, MICHAEL ZENK,

3 former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention

4 Center, JAMES SHERMAN, former Metropolitan

5 Detention Center Associate Warden for

6 Custody,

7

8 Defendants-Appellants,

9

10 JOHN ASHCROFT, former Attorney

11 General of the United States, ROBERT

12 MUELLER, former Director, Federal

13 Bureau of Investigation, JAMES W.

14 ZIGLAR, former Commissioner,

15 Immigration and Naturalization

16 Service,

17

18 Defendants-Cross-Appellees,

19

20 SALVATORE LOPRESTI, former Metropolitan

21 Detention Center Captain, JOSEPH CUCITI,

22 former Metropolitan Detention Center

23 Lieutenant,

24

25 Defendants.

26

27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

28

29 ORDER

30 Following disposition of this appeal, an active judge

31 of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear the case

32 en banc. A poll having been conducted and there being no

33 majority favoring en banc review, rehearing en banc is

34 hereby DENIED. 

35 Rosemary S. Pooler and Richard C. Wesley, Circuit

36 Judges, concur by opinion in the denial of rehearing en

37 banc.

2

Case 13-999, Document 272, 12/11/2015, 1661595, Page2 of 3
1 Dennis Jacobs, José A. Cabranes, Reena Raggi, Peter W.

2 Hall, Debra Ann Livingston, and Christopher F. Droney,

3 Circuit Judges, dissent by opinion from the denial of

4 rehearing en banc.

5 FOR THE COURT:

6 CATHERINE O’HAGAN WOLFE, CLERK

7

8

9

3

Case 13-999, Document 272, 12/11/2015, 1661595, Page3 of 3