Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01098/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01098-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Ketchum, et al. v. City of Vallejo

Extending Time CIV-S-05-1098 DFL JFM

DAVID P. MASTAGNI, ESQ. (SBN 57721)

DAVID E. MASTAGNI, ESQ. (SBN 204244)

WILL M. YAMADA, ESQ. (SBN 226669)

MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK, 

MILLER, JOHNSEN & UHRHAMMER 

A Professional Corporation

1912 “I” Street

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 446-4692

Facsimile: (916) 447-4614

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WYNATHEN KETHCUM, ANA

MENJIVAR, acting for themselves and

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF VALLEJO,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: CIV-S-05-1098 DFL JFM

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE

EXTENDING TIME OF VDRP

COMPLETION

1. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above-entitled action, by their

respective counsel, that the date to complete private mediation shall be extended.

2. On October 7, 2005 the parties were referred to Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP).

3. The parties were assigned a neutral on November 30, 2006. Pursuant to the Local Rules the 

parties are to complete the VDRP within ninety (90) days. 

4. The parties believe VDRP is appropriate for this case and wish to pursue VDRP as an option

in this matter. 

5. There have been no previous time modifications to this case. 

6. Modification of the schedule will enable the parties to continue with discovery.

7. The requested time modification will minimally effect the schedule of the case and will not 

Case 2:05-cv-01098-JAM -JFM Document 26 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Ketchum, et al. v. City of Vallejo

Extending Time -2- CIV-S-05-1098 DFL JFM

postpone any additional dates set in the pretrial scheduling order. 

8. The parties therefore request the date the parties are to complete VDRP be set for June 30, 2006.

MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK,

MILLER, JOHNSEN & UHRHAMMER

Dated: March 30, 2006

By: /s/ David E. Mastagni 

DAVID E. MASTAGNI,

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: March 30, 2006

By: 

CLAUDIA QUINTANA,

Attorney for Defendant

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Complete the VDRP Program Is

Hereby Adopted by the Court for the Case and the Parties Are Ordered to Comply with this Order. 

Dated: 4/6/2006 /s/ David F. Levi 

HONORABLE DAVID F. LEVI

Case 2:05-cv-01098-JAM -JFM Document 26 Filed 04/07/06 Page 2 of 2