Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03322/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03322-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SARNOFF + SARNOFF 

David J. Sarnoff (SBN: 23936) 

Maria Bourn (SBN: 269322) 

20 Park Rd., Suite D 

Burlingame, CA 94010 

Telephone: (650) 393-4995 

Facsimile: ( 650) 931-423 7 

Email: dsarnoff@sarnofflaw.com 

mboum@sarnofflaw.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

JANET NECHALDAS 

GREGORY C. CHENG (SBN: 226865) 

gregory.cheng@ogletreedeakins.com 

RACHEL J. MOROSKI (SBN: 286805) 

rachel.rnoroski@ogletreedeakins.corn 

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART 

Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 

One Market Plaza 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: 415.442.4810 

Facsimile: 415.442.4870 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DIALYSIS NEW CO, INC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JANET NECHALDAS, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DIALYSIS NEWCO, INC., A 

DELAWARE CORPORATION; AND 

DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 4:15-cv-03322-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER 

OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Complaint Filed: June 2, 2015 

Trial Date: February 13,2017 

- 1 - Printed on Recycled Paper 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Case 3:15-cv-03322-EMC Document 27 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 4
1 Pursuant to Federal Rules Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(ii) and local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff 

2 Janet Nechaldas and Defendant Dialysis Newco Inc., jointly stipulate that the Complaint and all 

3 claims against Defendant be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' 

4 fees and costs. 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

Dated: August 5, 2016 

12 Dated: August 5, 2016 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

By: 

By: 

-2-

SARNOFF+ SARNOFF 

A Professional Corporation 

David Sarnoff 

Maria Bourn 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JANET NECHALDAS 

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & 

~ 

STEWART, P.C. 

Gregory C. Cheng 

Rachel J. Moroski 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DIALYSIS NEWCO, INC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Case 3:15-cv-03322-EMC Document 27 Filed 08/08/16 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

[proposed] order 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Complaint and all of her 

claim against Defendant DIALYSIS NEW CO INC., are dismissed with prejudice, with each party 

to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. 

6 DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on San Francisco, California this ___ day of 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

____ ,2016. 

Hon. Edward Chen 

- 3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

8th August

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-03322-EMC Document 27 Filed 08/08/16 Page 3 of 4
I 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 

) 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 

ss. 

I am employed in the County of San Francisco in the State of California. I am over the 

age of I8 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 20 Park Road, Suite D, 

Burlingame, CA 940 I 0 

On the date set forth below, I served the following document(s): 

Stipulation and [proposed] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

9 in this action by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: 

I 0 Gregory Cheng 

RachelJ.~oroski 

II OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, S~OAK & 

STEWART, P.C. 

I2 Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 

One ~arket Plaza 

13 San Francisco, CA 94I 05 

I4 

15 

16 

17 

I8 

19 

20 

2I 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[X] By ~ail: I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope addressed as indicated above, 

on the above-mentioned date. I am familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing 

correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the US Postal Service on that same day in the 

ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed 

invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit 

for mailing in affidavit. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 5, 2016, at Burlingame, California. 

-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Case 3:15-cv-03322-EMC Document 27 Filed 08/08/16 Page 4 of 4