Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05893/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05893-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONARD HENDERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

C/O MACIAS,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 03 5893 OWW LJO P 

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RENEWED

MOTION TO DISMISS AS PREMATURE

(Doc. 33.) 

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Leonard Henderson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On October 21, 2005, this Court issued Findings and Recommendations that Defendant’s

Motion to Dismiss be denied without prejudice and that Defendants be granted thirty days after

the disposition of the Motion by the District Court to file the renewed Motion. 

On November 18, 2005, Defendants moved for an extension of time to file the renewed

Motion to Dismiss. However, the District Court has not yet issued an Order either adopting the

Case 1:03-cv-05893-OWW -LJO Document 36 Filed 11/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Findings and Recommendations or declining to adopt the Findings and Recommendations. This

Court’s recommendation was that the Motion be denied without prejudice and Defendants be

granted thirty days to file a renewed Motion. However, whether the Motion is denied without

prejudice and Defendants granted thirty days remains to be seen. Defendants thirty day allotment

will begin only if and when the District Court adopts the Recommendation of this Court.

Accordingly, the Motion for an Extension of time to file a Renewed Motion to Dismiss is

DENIED as premature. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 21, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05893-OWW -LJO Document 36 Filed 11/22/05 Page 2 of 2