Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02338/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02338-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES BOBO,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS,

Defendant.

No. 2:16-cv-2338 KJM CKD PS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. In this action, plaintiff 

complains about a foreclosure. The complaint, however, does not allege an adequate basis for 

subject matter jurisdiction in this court, simply citing “property in foreclosure and trespass.” 

Only state law claims are pled in the complaint. 

By order filed October 5, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to show cause no later than October 

19, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff

has not filed a response to the order to show cause. There being no evident basis for subject 

matter jurisdiction, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:16-cv-02338-KJM-CKD Document 4 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: October 21, 2016

4 bobo2338.nosmj.57

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-02338-KJM-CKD Document 4 Filed 10/21/16 Page 2 of 2