Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01218/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01218-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVERETT McCOY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-01-1218 DFL GGH P

vs.

CAL A. TERHUNE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On June 29, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed June 14, 2005, denying plaintiff’s request for a new discovery cut-off date. 

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed June 14, 2005 is affirmed. 

DATED: 9/14/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:01-cv-01218-JAM-GGH Document 90 Filed 09/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:01-cv-01218-JAM-GGH Document 90 Filed 09/16/05 Page 2 of 2