Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03341/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03341-37/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHIRLEY “RAE” ELLIS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

No. C-04-3341 EMC

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

(Docket No. 814)

Currently pending before the Court is Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation’s motion for

summary judgment. At the hearing, one of the issues presented was whether part of Plaintiff Elaine

Sasaki’s claim for retaliation is time barred. Ms. Sasaki cited two cases on this issue, one which was

not previously cited and one which was cited but not discussed in any detail. The Court hereby

orders the parties to provide supplemental briefing on those two cases and their applicability herein:

Anderson v. Reno, 190 F.3d 930 (9th Cir. 1999), and Jones v. Calvert Group, Ltd., 551 F.3d 297 (4th

Cir. 2009). The supplemental briefing shall be filed by May 7, 2015, at 12:00 p.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 4, 2015

_________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03341-EMC Document 851 Filed 05/04/15 Page 1 of 1