Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00321/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00321-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVE NOBLE, CASE NO. CV-F-05-0321 OWW DLB P

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING 

PRISON TO PROVIDE COPYING SERVICE

J. WOODFORD, et al., (Doc. 41)

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on plaintiff’s complaint, filed March 7, 2005

against J. Woodford, for enacting, implementing, and/or enforcing policies and/or practices that resulted

in the denial of visitation with plaintiff’s child. On October 2, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion seeking a

court order mandating that prison officials provide him with “duplicating services.”

This court has no jurisdiction to grant the relief requested. This action is proceeding on

plaintiff’s claim that he was denied visitation with his child. Plaintiff’s request is unrelated to the issues

in this case. Further, the officer who allegedly denied the copying service is not a defendant in this case.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for an order commanding the prison to provide duplicating

services is DENIED. However, the Court will extend plaintiff’s current deadline to file a reply to

defendant’s opposition to motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiff’s reply shall be filed on or before

November 15, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 4, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00321-OWW -DLB Document 42 Filed 10/04/06 Page 1 of 1