Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00447/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00447-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Martin W. Winn, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Unifund CCR Partners, et al. 

Defendants. ________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-447-TUC-FRZ (GEE)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. On August 8,

2007, Magistrate Judge Glenda E. Edmonds issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that the motion be denied. The Report and Recommendation indicated that

any party could file written objections within ten days of being served with a copy of the

Report and Recommendation. The parties have not filed any objections to the Report and

Recommendation, and the time for filing objections has expired. As such, the Court will not

consider any objections at this point in time.

The Court has reviewed the entire record and concludes that Magistrate Judge

Edmonds’ recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R.

Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v.

Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 

Case 4:06-cv-00447-FRZ-GEE Document 49 Filed 09/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) United States Magistrate Judge Edmonds’ Report and Recommendation (Doc. #48) is

ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED.

(2) Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. #42) is denied.

DATED this 14th day of September, 2007.

Case 4:06-cv-00447-FRZ-GEE Document 49 Filed 09/14/07 Page 2 of 2