Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01983/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01983-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

---

1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JILL P. TELFER, (STATE BAR NO. 145450) 

LAW OFFICES OF JILL P. TELFER 

A Professional Corporation 

331 J Street, Suite 200 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 446-1916 

Facsimile: (916) 446-1726 

Email: jtelfer@telferlaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

KARIN BJORK 

UNITED STATES OF DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KARIN BJORK, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF PLACER THE DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, and DOES 1 

through 10, inclusive, 

 Defendant. 

_____________________________________ 

KARIN BJORK, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF PLACER THE DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, and DOES 1 

through 10, inclusive, 

 Defendant.

Lead Case No. 2:14-cv-01983-MCE-EFB 

Case No. 2:13-cv-01616-MCE-EFB 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL 

DOCUMENTS AND DENYING 

DEFENDANTS MOTION TO QUASH A 

DEPOSITION SUBPOENA OF TERESA 

LEVENFELD 

Date: July 20, 2016 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 8 

Judge: Hon. Edmund F. Brennan 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:14-cv-01983-MCE-EFB Document 60 Filed 07/25/16 Page 1 of 3
2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Plaintiff Karin Bjork’s (“Bjork”) two Motions to Compel Documents [Dkt. 49 and 50] and 

Defendants Motion to Quash the deposition subpoena of investigator Teresa Levenfeld [Dkt. 54] 

came on for hearing on Wednesday July 20, 2016. Jill P. Telfer appeared on behalf of Plaintiff 

Karin Bjork. David K. Huskey appeared on behalf of Defendant County of Placer District 

Attorney’s Office. 

 After review of the papers and arguments made by counsel, the Court granted Plaintiff’s 

Motion to Compel Document Request 4, 6, 8, 15, 18, 22 and 24 with the following conditions: 

1. Plaintiff shall amend document request No. 15, 22, and 24 to be more narrowly tailored 

as described at the hearing. 

2. Third parties whose documents are being produced in response to Document Request 

No. 15 shall have 7 days to object to the production of documents. Said objection must be 

electronically filed with the Court. 

3. Counsel for the Defendant shall immediately notify third parties whose records are being 

requested, under Document Request No. 15 and inform them of their right to object to document 

request within seven days. 

4. As to documents requested concerning third party Rich Opich, the Defendant is only 

required to produce documents concerning any performance concerns about Rich Opich over the 

last 10 years of his employment. However, if Defendant plans to raise issues regarding Rich 

Opich’s performance from an earlier time frame, it must immediately turn over any responsive 

documents from the earlier time frame. 

 As to these three discovery motions, the parties are reminded that if there is a need to 

modify the protective order, the parties may do so and submit a proposed order to the Court. 

/// 

Case 2:14-cv-01983-MCE-EFB Document 60 Filed 07/25/16 Page 2 of 3
3 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 25, 2016. ___________________________________ 

EDMUND F. BRENNAN 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Approved as to Form: 

/s/ David Huskey 

________________________________ 

David K. Huskey 

Attorney for Defendant County of Placer 

Case 2:14-cv-01983-MCE-EFB Document 60 Filed 07/25/16 Page 3 of 3