Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01248/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01248-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN TYRONE FLEMINGS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GRAY, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 1:14-cv-01248 LJO DLB PC

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR 

FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE

ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE 

INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

[ECF No. 28]

Plaintiff Kevin T. Flemings (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 

rights action. Plaintiff filed this action on August 8, 2014. The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 27, 2016, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma 

pauperis status. Plaintiff was directed to pay the filing fee within fourteen days. Over fourteen 

days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, the action will be 

dismissed.

On February 10, 2016, Plaintiff filed a request to file an interlocutory appeal under 28 

U.S.C. § 1292. The Court finds that the order of January 27, 2016, is not an appealable order 

pursuant to § 1292. In any case, on February 16, 2016, Plaintiff did in fact file a notice of appeal 

and the appeal has been processed to the Ninth Circuit. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion for 

permission to file a notice of appeal will be disregarded as moot.

Case 1:14-cv-01248-LJO-DLB Document 31 Filed 02/18/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The action is DISMISSED for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee;

2. Plaintiff’s request to file notice of appeal is DISREGARDED.

This terminates this action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01248-LJO-DLB Document 31 Filed 02/18/16 Page 2 of 2