Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02920/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02920-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

JULIA M. ADAMS (State Bar #230795)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

PATRICK CONNALLY

and DISABILITY RIGHTS 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION 

SERVICES: HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK CONNALLY, an individual;

and DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION

SERVICES:HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FRANK’S PIER 15; RICHARD J. ISI; and

FRANK E. HAWKINS, an individual dba

FRANK’S PIER 15, 

Defendants.

______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-2920 VRW

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own costs

and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction

over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375

(1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement

agreements).

///

Case 3:04-cv-02920-VRW Document 17 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON -2-

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through

their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: January 18, 2006 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Julia M. Adams 

Julia M. Adams

Attorneys for PATRICK CONNALLY and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES:HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS

Dated: January 6, 2006 DeMARTINI & WALKER LLP

By: /s/ Vincent J. DeMartini 

 Vincent J. DeMartini

Attorneys for Defendant RICHARD J. ISI

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: _________________________, 2006

______________________________________

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

January 30

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANTED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:04-cv-02920-VRW Document 17 Filed 01/30/06 Page 2 of 2