Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04722/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04722-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Plaintiff also purports to bring claim(s) on behalf of three deceased individuals.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEROME L. GRIMES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

JOSEPH HUANG, et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-05-4722 MMC

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT;

DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Before the Court is plaintiff Jerome L. Grimes’ application to proceed in forma

pauperis and his complaint1

 against 114 individuals, both of which were filed on November

15, 2005.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), where a plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma

pauperis, the district court must dismiss the complaint if the court determines that the

complaint is frivolous or malicious, or that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which

relief can be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii).

Here, plaintiff’s complaint falls directly within the category of pleadings identified in

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Plaintiff’s claims are based upon, inter alia, defendants being

“organ smugglers,” defendants having engaged in the “Oklahoma City bombing” and being

“9/11/01 bombers,” defendants’ committing “premediated STD,” and defendants’ being
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

involved in a “highly sophisticated old aged natural death frame up.” Moreover, plaintiff

does not allege any cognizable basis for a federal district court to assert jurisdiction over

his claim(s), and no such basis is apparent from the allegations. Finally, there is no

indication plaintiff can cure the above-referenced deficiencies.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is hereby DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B), and plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED

as moot.

The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 29, 2005 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge