Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00250/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00250-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHAD RUDOLPHO ANGLE, 

 

 CASE NO. C 07-00250 (SI) 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

 v. ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL 

CENTER, et al., 

 Defendants(s) 

___________________________________/ 

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation 

pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process; 

Court Processes: 

 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

[SEE ATTACHMENT] 

(Note: Parties who believe than an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely 

to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this 

form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 

3-5) 

Private Process: 

 Private ADR (please identify process and provider)__________________ 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to 

 an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) 

 other requested deadline________________________________________ 

Dated: March 30, 2007 . 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: March 30, 2007 . 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL 

 CENTER and MOHAMMAED A. HYDERI 

Dated: March 30, 2007 /s/ Jesper I. Rasmussen . 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, 

 PLUMMER, VAN DICKEN, GRIFFIN, 

 CERVELLI, RAY, PECK, PHIENOR and 

 BRAAKSMA 

Case 3:07-cv-00250-SI Document 33 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:07-cv-00250-SI Document 35 Filed 04/03/07 Page 1 of 3
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

 Non-binding Arbitration 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 

 Mediation 

 Private ADR 

 Deadline for ADR session 

 90 days from the date of this order. 

 Other 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:_________________ ____________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-00250-SI Document 33 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 2 of 3

to be determined after status re: plaintiff's counsel is finalized.

Case 3:07-cv-00250-SI Document 35 Filed 04/03/07 Page 2 of 3
3

ATTACHMENT 

Tim Pori, counsel for plaintiff in this matter, has filed a Motion to Withdraw as counsel 

in this matter for health reasons. The hearing on this motion is set for April 13, 2007. The 

County of Alameda’s counsel has been informed by attorney Amy Morton, who is a personal 

friend of Tim Pori but is not affiliated with his office, that Mr. Pori is a sole practitioner and that 

he has been out of his office on disability leave since the beginning of February, 2007. As 

counsel for the County, I have not been able to meet and confer with Mr. Pori regarding ADR. 

The Court set this matter for an Initial Case Management Conference on April 27, 2007. 

The parties have stipulated to continuing the Case Management Conference and pre-CMC 

deadlines. The County believes this stipulation has been submitted to the Court for issuance of 

an appropriate order. However, due to the unavailability of Mr. Pori in this matter, the parties 

are unable to meet and confer and stipulate to some form of ADR by today’s deadline. 

Accordingly, counsel for the County defendants are filing this to advise the Court. 

The County Defendants are agreeable to ENE as a form of ADR. 

Case 3:07-cv-00250-SI Document 33 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
 Case 3:07-cv-00250-SI Document 35 Filed 04/03/07 Page 3 of 3