Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02499/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02499-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES JOSHUA MAYFIELD, JAMES 

ALLISON MAYFIELD, JR., and TERRI 

MAYFIELD, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

IVAN OROZCO, SHERIFF 

SCOTTJONES, JAMES LEWIS, 

RICKPATTISON, COUNTY 

OFSACRAMENTO, UNIVERSITY 

OFCALIFORNIA 

DAVISHEALTHSYSTEM, DR. 

GREGORYSOKOLOV, DR. ROBERT 

HALS, and Does 1-5, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-02499 JAM AC 

ORDER 

 Plaintiffs have filed two motions for attorneys fees, one against County defendants and 

one against UC Davis defendants, both noticed for hearing on December 19, 2016. Having 

reviewed the moving papers, oppositions and replies, the court notes that the parties have failed to 

establish the relevant rate in the Eastern District of California or a basis for deviating from that 

rate as required by Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc., 523 F.3d 973 (2008), instead 

addressing only the rates charged by plaintiffs in similar cases without reference to this 

community’s rates. See also Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Assoc. v. California Dept. of 

Case 2:13-cv-02499-JAM-AC Document 171 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Education, 2016 WL 4375015 at 13 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2016); Lehr v. City of Sacramento, 2013 

WL 13286549 at *4 (E.D. Cal. April 2, 2013). 

 In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The December 21, 2016 hearing on plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Expenses and 

Sanctions (ECF No. 160) and Motion for Reasonable Expenses (ECF No. 161) is 

VACATED; 

2. The parties shall file simultaneous Supplemental Briefs, addressing the appropriate rate to 

be applied in this case, within 21 days of this Order; 

3. The parties may each file a Reply Memorandum 7 days thereafter. 

DATED: December 19, 2016 

Case 2:13-cv-02499-JAM-AC Document 171 Filed 12/19/16 Page 2 of 2