Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00559/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00559-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARIE L. FIALA (CA BAR NO. 79676) 

RUSSELL P. COHEN (CA BAR NO. 213105) 

CECILIA Y. CHAN (CA BAR NO. 240971) 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

333 Bush Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104-2878 

Telephone: (415) 772-6000 

Facsimile: (415) 772-6268 

marie.fiala@hellerehrman.com 

russell.cohen@hellerehrman.com 

cecilia.chan@hellerehrman.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 

[ADDITIONAL PARTIES AND COUNSEL 

SHOWN ON SIGNATURE PAGE] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern 

California Edison Company, and California 

Electricity Oversight Board, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Arizona Electric Power Cooperative; City of 

Anaheim; City of Azusa; City of Banning; City of 

Burbank; City of Glendale; City of Los Angeles; 

City of Pasadena; City of Riverside; City of Santa 

Clara; City of Seattle; City of Vernon; Eugene 

Water and Electric Board; Los Angeles Department 

of Water and Power; Modesto Irrigation District; 

Northern California Power Agency; Public Utility 

District No. 2 of Grant County; Sacramento 

Municipal Utility District; Salt River Project 

Agricultural Improvement and Power District; and 

Turlock Irrigation District, 

Defendants. 

Case No.: 2:06-CV-0559-MCE-KJM 

Related Case: 

Case No. 2:06-CV-0592-MCE-KJM 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX 

PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER 

EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

AND RESCHEDULING HEARING 

The Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. 

Hearing Date: None set 

[Ex Parte Application; Declaration of 

Russell P. Cohen filed concurrently.] 

Case 2:06-cv-00559-MCE -KJM Document 192 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

San Diego Gas & Electric Company, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Arizona Electric Power Cooperative; City of 

Anaheim; City of Azusa; City of Banning; City of 

Burbank; City of Glendale; City of Los Angeles; 

City of Pasadena; City of Riverside; City of Santa 

Clara; City of Seattle; City of Vernon; Eugene 

Water and Electric Board; Los Angeles Department 

of Water and Power; Modesto Irrigation District; 

Northern California Power Agency; Public Utility 

District No. 2 of Grant County; Sacramento 

Municipal Utility District; Salt River Project 

Agricultural Improvement and Power District; and 

Turlock Irrigation District, 

Defendants. 

Case No.: 2:06-CV-00592-MCE-KJM 

Case 2:06-cv-00559-MCE -KJM Document 192 Filed 06/23/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

On June 15, 2006, plaintiffs Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison 

Company, California Electricity Oversight Board, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company filed an 

ex parte application requesting that the Court extend the briefing schedule and reschedule the 

hearing set forth in the Stipulation and Order Setting Briefing Schedule and Related Procedural 

Issues (“Briefing Order”) (docket no. 45). Having considered the ex parte application and 

supporting declaration, and good cause appearing therefore, plaintiffs’ ex parte application is 

hereby GRANTED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that and the Briefing Order is amended as follows: 

1. Remaining briefing on the motions brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

(“FRCP”) 12(b)(1) and the Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or, in the Alternative, Stay Proceedings 

brought by defendant Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County (“Grant County’s Motion to 

Dismiss”), to be conducted according to the following schedule: 

• Opposition briefs to be filed and served August 4, 2006; and 

• Reply briefs to be filed and served September 15, 2006. 

2. Hearing on the Rule 12(b)(1) motions and Grant County’s Motion to Dismiss to be 

rescheduled to the same time as the other preliminary motions and specially set for October 24, 

2006 at 2:00 p.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 22, 2006

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00559-MCE -KJM Document 192 Filed 06/23/06 Page 3 of 3