Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01109/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01109-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-PA/3643179.1 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

(CASE NO. C 07-01109 CW) 

MELINDA S. RIECHERT, State Bar No. 65504 

LINDSEY K. SCHROEDER, State Bar No. 245425 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

2 Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2122 

Tel: 650.843.4000 

Fax: 650.843.4001 

E-mail: mriechert@morganlewis.com 

Attorneys for Defendants BRANDYWINE REALTY 

TRUST & DANIEL CUSHING 

JASON J. CURLIANO, State Bar No. 167509 

ADAM M. KOSS, State Bar No. 245465 

BUTY & CURLIANO LLP 

555 12th Street, Suite 1280 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Tel: 510.267.3000 

Fax: 510.267.0117 

E-mail: jasonc@butycurliano.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN SUTTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOHN SUTTON, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST, 

DANIEL CUSHING, and 

DOES 1 through 20, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 07-01109 CW 

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING 

ADR PROCESS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes: 

 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

Case 4:07-cv-01109-CW Document 15 Filed 05/18/07 Page 1 of 3
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-PA/3643179.1 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

(CASE NO. C 07-01109 CW) 

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process: 

 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring 

the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

 other requested deadline: 

Dated: May ___, 2007 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP 

By: 

Melinda Riechert 

Attorney for Defendant 

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST 

AND DANIEL CUSHING 

Dated: May ___, 2007 BUTY & CURLIANO LLP 

By: 

Jason J. Curliano, Esq. 

Adam K. Koss, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JOHN SUTTON 

Case 4:07-cv-01109-CW Document 15 Filed 05/18/07 Page 2 of 3
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-PA/3643179.1 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

(CASE NO. C 07-01109 CW) 

ORDER 

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

 Non-binding Arbitration 

X Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 

 Mediation 

 Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session 

X 90 days from the date of this order. 

 other ___________________ 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 5/18/07 

Dated: 

Honorable Claudia Wilken 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:07-cv-01109-CW Document 15 Filed 05/18/07 Page 3 of 3