Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01207/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01207-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE — 05-CV-01207 OWW LJO

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ANDREA A. TREECE, State Bar No. 237639 

DEBORAH S. REAMES, State Bar No. 117257 

Earthjustice 

426 17th Street, 5th Floor 

Oakland, CA 94612 

atreece@earthjustice.org; dreames@earthjustice.org

Telephone: 510/550-6725 

Facsimile: 510/550-6749 

TRENT W. ORR, State Bar No. 077656 

953 Clayton Street, #5 

San Francisco, CA 94117 

torr@earthjustice.org

Telephone: 415/665-2185 

Facsimile: 415/665-2592 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

HAMILTON CANDEE, State Bar No. 111376 

KATHERINE POOLE, State Bar No. 195010 

Natural Resources Defense Council 

111 Sutter St., 20th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

hcandee@nrdc.org; kpoole@nrdc.org

Telephone: 415/875-6100 

Facsimile: 415/875/6161 

Attorneys for Plaintiff NRDC 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE 

COUNCIL, et al.

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

GALE A. NORTON, Secretary, U.S. Department 

of the Interior, et al.

 Defendants. 

SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER 

AUTHORITY and WESTLANDS WATER 

DISTRICT; CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU 

FEDERATION; GLENN-COLUSA 

IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al.; and 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER 

RESOURCES 

 Defendant-Intervenors. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 05-CV-01207 OWW LJO 

Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REVISE 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-01207-DAD-EPG Document 216 Filed 05/01/06 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE — 05-CV-01207 OWW LJO

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record, scheduled 

by stipulation and order of the Court (March 23, 2006) to be heard on April 10, 2006 was 

inadvertently left off the Court’s calendar of hearings for that day, and the April 10 hearing date 

was vacated as a result. By minute order of April 11, 2006, the hearing on the motion was 

rescheduled for May 8, 2006. Under the briefing and hearing schedule set by the Court (by order 

of Feb. 14, 2006, as revised Mar. 23, 2006), the hearing on the motion to supplement was to be 

heard before briefing on summary judgment motions was to commence. However, under the 

Court’s March 23, 2006 stipulated revised scheduling order, Plaintiff’s opening brief on 

summary judgment is due May 1, 2006, prior to the hearing of the motion to supplement. In 

order to get this matter back on an orderly and expeditious schedule for its briefing, hearing, and 

resolution on the merits of summary judgment motions, the parties stipulate to the following 

revised schedule following upon the May 8, 2006 hearing on the motion to supplement, subject 

to the Court’s approval: 

June 9, 2006 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment 

July 14, 2006 Federal Defendants’ and Defendant-Intervenors’ Responses and any 

Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment 

Aug. 4, 2006 Plaintiffs’ Reply and Response to Cross-Motions for Summary 

Judgment 

Aug. 25, 2006 Federal Defendants’ and Defendant-Intervenors’ Replies to Plaintiffs’ 

Response to Cross-Motions 

Sept. 25, 2006 Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment 

Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: April 26, 2006 /s/ Trent W. Orr 

TRENT W. ORR 

ANDREA A. TREECE 

DEBORAH S. REAMES 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

KATHERINE S. POOLE 

HAMILTON CANDEE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Natural Resources Defense Council 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-01207-DAD-EPG Document 216 Filed 05/01/06 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE — 05-CV-01207 OWW LJO

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: April 26, 2006 SUE ELLEN WOOLDRIDGE 

Assistant Attorney General 

United States Department of Justice 

Environment and Natural Resources Division 

JEAN E. WILLIAMS, Chief 

SETH M. BARSKY, Assistant Chief 

/s/ Keith Rizzardi (as authorized 4/26/06)

KEITH RIZZARDI, Trial Attorney 

Wildlife and Marine Resources Section 

Benjamin Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7369 

Washington, D.C. 20044-7369 

Telephone: (202) 305-0207 

Facsimile: (202) 305-0275 

Attorneys for Federal Defendants 

DATED: April 26, 2006 /s/ Daniel J. O’Hanlon (as authorized 4/26/06)

DANIEL J. O’HANLON 

Attorney for Intervenors San Luis & Delta-Mendota 

Water Authority and Westlands Water District 

DATED: April 26, 2006 /s/ Brenda Washington Davis (as authorized 

4/26/06)

BRENDA WASHINGTON DAVIS 

JOHN R. HEWITT 

RONDA AZEVEDO LUCAS 

CHRISTOPHER H. BUCKLEY, JR. 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER 

Attorneys for Intervenors 

California Farm Bureau Federation 

DATED: April 26, 2006 /s/ Andrew M. Hitchings (as authorized 4/26/06)

ANDREW M. HITCHINGS 

Attorney for Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District, et al.

DATED: April 26, 2006 BILL LOCKYER 

Attorney General for the State of California 

/s/ Clifford T. Lee (as authorized 4/26/06)

CLIFFORD T. LEE 

DEBORAH A. WORDHAM 

Deputy Attorneys General 

Attorneys for California Department 

of Water Resources 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-01207-DAD-EPG Document 216 Filed 05/01/06 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE — 05-CV-01207 OWW LJO

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: April 26, 2006 /s/ Gregory K. Wilkinson (as authorized 4/26/06)

GREGORY K. WILKINSON 

STEVEN M. ANDERSON 

BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 

Attorneys for Intervenors 

State Water Contractors 

ORDER

The Court, having read and considered the foregoing stipulation, and good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 27, 2006 __/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER____________ 

OLIVER W. WANGER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-01207-DAD-EPG Document 216 Filed 05/01/06 Page 4 of 4