Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06583/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06583-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

580 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1100

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC. TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06583-MMC

RONALD I. RAETHER, JR. (SBN 303118)

ronald.raether@troutmansanders.com

TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

5 Park Plaza, Suite 1400

Irvine, CA 92614-2545

Telephone: (949) 622.2700

Facsimile: (949) 622.2739

MARK C. MAO (SBN 236165)

mark.mao@troutmansanders.com

SHEILA M. PHAM (SBN 293673)

sheila.pham@troutmansanders.com

TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

580 California Street, Suite 1100

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 447-5700

Facsimile: (415) 447-5710

Attorneys for Defendant

CLARITY SERVICES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOYCE BENTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CLARITY SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1

through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:16-cv-06583-MMC

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR

DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC.

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND

PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Complaint filed: October 13, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-06583-MMC Document 15 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 3
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

580 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1100

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC. TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06583-MMC

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, and by and through their counsel, Plaintiff

Joyce Benton (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. (“Clarity”) (collectively, the

“Parties”), hereby agree to the following briefing schedule and seek an Order from the Court

confirming same:

Clarity shall have until December 12, 2016 to answer or otherwise respond to the

Complaint.

If Clarity files a responsive pleading other than an Answer, Plaintiff shall have until

January 9, 2017 to file an opposition to Clarity’s Motion, and Clarity shall have until January 16,

2017 to file a reply.

This Stipulation is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to seek a remand of the action,

which shall be due on December 14, 2016. If Plaintiff files a Motion to Remand the action,

Clarity’s opposition shall be filed on January 6, 2017, and Plaintiff’s reply shall be filed on

January 13, 2017.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:16-cv-06583-MMC Document 15 Filed 11/22/16 Page 2 of 3
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

580 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1100

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC. TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Dated: November 21, 2016 TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

By: /s/ Sheila M. Pham

Ronald I. Raether, Jr.

Mark C. Mao

Sheila M. Pham

Attorneys for Defendant Clarity Services,

Inc.

CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP

By: /s/ Christian Schreiber

Mark. A. Chavez

Christian Schreiber

Attorneys for Plaintiff Joyce Benton

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: ______________________ _____________________________

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

United States District Court Judge

November 22, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-06583-MMC Document 15 Filed 11/22/16 Page 3 of 3