Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00769/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00769-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Pedro Chairez,

 Petitioner,

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

 Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-11-0769-PHX-PGR (MEA)

 

 ORDER

 

Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Aspey notwithstanding that no party has filed any objection to the Report and

Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly determined

that the petitioner’s habeas corpus petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254,

should be dismissed as time-barred because it was filed over fourteen years after

the expiration of the AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations and the petitioner has

made no showing that the limitations period should be equitably tolled. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(Doc. 18) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. §

2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is denied and that

Case 2:11-cv-00769-PGR Document 19 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

- 2 -

this action is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue

because jurists of reason would neither find it debatable whether the petitioner’s

habeas petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right nor whether

the Court is correct in its procedural ruling.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner should not be allowed to

appeal in forma pauperis.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment

accordingly.

DATED this 23rd day of May, 2012.

Case 2:11-cv-00769-PGR Document 19 Filed 05/23/12 Page 2 of 2