Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00767/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00767-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEIYA COSMETICS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LARKIN, INC. et al,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 07-00767 JSW

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO

FILE UNDER SEAL

Now before the Court is the stipulation to file exhibit E under seal to Feiya Cosmetics,

LLC’s opposition to Larkin, Inc’s motion for administrative relief to modify the pre-trial

schedule.

As a public forum, the Court will only entertain requests to seal that establish good

cause and are narrowly tailored to seal only the particular information that is genuinely

privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise has a compelling need for

confidentiality. Documents 

may not be filed under seal pursuant to blanket protective orders covering multiple documents. 

In addition, counsel should not attempt to seal entire pleadings or declarations without a

particularized showing explaining why the request could not be more narrowly tailored. Any

order granting a request to seal shall direct the sealing of only those documents, pages, or if

practicable, those portions of documents or pages that contain the information requiring

 confidentiality. All other portions of such documents shall remain in the public file. Civil L.R.

79-5(b) & cmt.

Case 3:07-cv-00767-JSW Document 70 Filed 11/01/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

A stipulation requesting the filing of a particular document under seal is not in

compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Therefore, the Court does not approve the stipulation

without prejudice to the parties complying with the rules of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 1, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-00767-JSW Document 70 Filed 11/01/07 Page 2 of 2