Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-01380/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-01380-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE —No. C-03-01380 RMW

JAH

E-FILED on 4/5/06

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FAMILY MORTGAGE CORPORATION

NO. 15,

Plaintiff,

v.

PERRY L. GREINER,

Defendant.

No. C-03-01380 RMW

ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION TO

EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

[Re Docket No. 119]

Defendant Perry Greiner again applies ex parte for more time to respond to plaintiff Family

Mortgage Corporation No. 15's motion to enter and enforce judgment. 

The court essentially granted Greiner's previous request—despite certain of plaintiff's

objections—to continue the hearing date on plaintiff's motion to April 21, 2006. The court extended

the briefing schedule as defendant requested. The order specifically gave dates on which the

opposition and reply would be due—dates papers would have been due under the Civil Local Rules'

default briefing schedule had the hearing been on defendant's requested date of April 21. Although

the court was not available on April 21 and continued the hearing to the following week, it did not

extend the briefing schedule because it could benefit from extra time to consider the filings

associated with plaintiff's motion. 

Case 5:03-cv-01380-RMW Document 120 Filed 04/05/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 If the parties are unavailable on May 12, the court will consider changing the hearing date

only by written stipulation showing good cause or pursuant to a motion filed for an order shortening

time. However, the court will not extend the briefing schedule further even if the hearing date is

changed.

ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE —No. C-03-01380 RMW

JAH 2

Though Greiner's opposition was due March 31, he has not yet filed one. The court only

reluctantly approves the stipulated due dates for the opposition and reply. The court will also

continue the hearing on plaintiff's motion to May 12, 2005, at 9 a.m. No further requests for

extensions of time will be granted.1

ORDER

The court orders as follows:

1. Defendant shall file his opposition to plaintiff's motion to enter and enforce judgment no

later than April 7, 2006.

2. Plaintiff shall file its reply no later than April 21, 2006.

3. Plaintiff's motion to enter and enforce judgment will be heard on May 12, 2006 at 9 a.m.

DATED: 4/5/06 /s/ Ronald M. Whyte

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:03-cv-01380-RMW Document 120 Filed 04/05/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE —No. C-03-01380 RMW

JAH 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

Mark V. Isola misola@rehonroberts.com 

Peter M. Rehon prehon@rehonroberts.com 

Tiffany L. Goodman 

Tyler J. Olson tolson@rehonroberts.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

A copy will also be mailed to:

Stanford H. Atwood, Jr., Eric S. Haiman 

Atwood Haiman & Westerberg 

18805 Cox Ave 

Suite 200 

Saratoga, CA 95070-4183 

Dated: 4/5/06 /s/ JH 

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:03-cv-01380-RMW Document 120 Filed 04/05/06 Page 3 of 3