Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06490/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06490-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order

BETTS & WRIGHT, A Professional Corporation

Attorneys at Law

P.O. Box 28550

Fresno, CA 93729-8550

Telephone: (559) 438-8500

Facsimile: (559) 438-6959

James B. Betts (State Bar #110222)

Joseph D. Rubin (State Bar #149920)

CITY OF FRESNO

Francine M. Kanne, Assistant City Attorney (State Bar #139028)

2600 Fresno Street

Fresno, California 93721-3602

Telephone: (559) 498-1326

Facsimile: (559) 488-1084

Attorneys for Defendants MICHAEL GUTHRIE and ROGER ENMARK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL NEVEU,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL GUTHRIE, individually; and

ROGER ENMARK, individually,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 Case No. CIV-F-04-6490 OWW/JLD

ORDER

Trial: November 27, 2007

This Order is to confirm the terms of a stipulated order that was placed on the

record before the Court on December 12, 2007, by counsel with the approval of their

respective clients who were present.

Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court ORDERS, as follows:

1. Defendants waive any recoverable costs within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.

§ 1923 and any recoverable attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 if they are the

prevailing parties;

Case 1:04-cv-06490-OWW -GSA Document 244 Filed 01/02/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 Order

2. Plaintiff dismisses his claim for violation of the First Amendment based

upon his memos and speech relating to Officer Mata with prejudice;

3. Plaintiff dismisses his punitive damage claim against the Defendants with

prejudice;

4. Plaintiff dismisses his claims against Defendant West with prejudice;

5. Plaintiff waives any right to attorney’s fees that were incurred prior to the

substitution of Mr. Baker in this lawsuit on September 10, 2007;

6. Plaintiff waives any right to appellate review of the judgment in favor of

Defendants Dyer, Garner and the City of Fresno; and

7. Plaintiff waives any right to appellate review of the Court’s summary

judgment order and the Court’s determination during the course of trial that Plaintiff

could not seek damages for the differential pay between the rank of sergeant and the

rank of police officer.

Dated: December 27, 2007 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER

OLIVER W. WANGER

U.S. District Court Judge

Eastern District

Case 1:04-cv-06490-OWW -GSA Document 244 Filed 01/02/08 Page 2 of 2