Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_02-cv-01686/USCOURTS-azd-2_02-cv-01686-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Plaintiffs apparently received a copy because they filed an objection (Doc. #420).

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

CAROL ANN AGSTER, personal

representative of the Estate of CHARLES

J. AGSTER, III, deceased; CHARLES J.

AGSTER, JR., and CAROL ANN

AGSTER, surviving parents of CHARLES

J. AGSTER, III,

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

MARICOPA COUNTY, a public entity; et

al.

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-02-1686-PHX-JAT

ORDER

On October 5, 2005, Defendants filed a "Notice re of [sic] Lodging form of

Judgment." (Doc. #418). No form of judgment was attached, nor was one e-mailed to

chambers as required by the administrative policies and procedures manual for CM/ECF.

Therefore, no judgment will be entered because no judgment was submitted and Doc. #418

will be denied for that reason.1

Moreover, Defendants made no showing that judgment should be entered at this time

as required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Accordingly, the parties are

advised that all judgments will be entered at the conclusion of the trial of this matter, and

Case 2:02-cv-01686-JAT Document 425 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

either party may submit a proposed form of judgment to be entered at the same time the jury

verdicts are read and received.

Therefore, to the extent Doc. #418 could be construed as a motion for entry of partial

judgment, that request is DENIED.

DATED this 24th day of October, 2005.

Case 2:02-cv-01686-JAT Document 425 Filed 10/24/05 Page 2 of 2