Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00030/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00030-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NABIL MANLEY,

Petitioner,

vs.

ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, Warden,

Respondent.

No. 2:03-cv-00030-JKS

FINAL JUDGMENT

The Court having entered its memorandum decision of even date herewith disposing of all

issues raised in the petition,

IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the Petition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the court declines to issue a Certificate of

Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (“reasonable

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved

in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to

proceed further” (internal quotation marks omitted)). The petition was filed untimely and all

issues raised in the petition were denied by the California Courts on adequate independent state

grounds. To the extent that it is presumed that the state courts ruled on the merits, no reasonable

jurist could find their that the decisions were “objectively unreasonable.”

If Petitioner wishes to appeal this adverse decision, he may either request this Court

reconsider denial of the grant of a Certificate of Appealability, or directly petition the Ninth

Circuit Court of Appeals and seek a Certificate of Appealability from that court. See NINTH

CIRCUIT RULE 22-1(d). 

Dated at Anchorage, Alaska this 5th day of July, 2007.

s/ James K. Singleton, Jr.

JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-00030-JKS Document 24 Filed 07/05/07 Page 1 of 1