Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01945/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01945-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

EXHIBITS 2-4 TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT CA’S COUNTERCLAIM FOR LOST 

PROFITS; Case No. 3:14-CV-1945-VC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

APPDYNAMICS, INC., JYOTI BANSAL, 

and BHASKAR SUNKARA, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

CA, Inc. d/b/a CA Technologies, 

Defendant. 

 

Case No.: 3:14-cv-01945-vc 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

EXHIBITS 2-4 TO PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT 

CA’S COUNTERCLAIM FOR LOST 

PROFITS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 37(C)

By administrative motion, Plaintiffs AppDynamics, Inc., Jyoti Bansal, and Bhaskar Sunkara 

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have moved to file under seal Exhibits 2-4 to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike 

Defendant CA’s Counterclaim for Lost Profits Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c). 

Document Portion to be Sealed 

Exhibit 2 - Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ First Set 

of Interrogatories 

Entire Document 

Exhibit 3 - CA, Inc.’s Supplemental Rule 26(a)(1) Initial 

Disclosure of Computation of Damages 

Entire Document 

Exhibit 4 - Defendant’s First Supplemental Response to 

Plaintiffs’ Interrogatory Nos. 1, 6, 16, 17, and 19 

Entire Document 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: By: 

 

Hon. Vince Chhabria 

United States District Judge 

April 8, 2015

Case 3:14-cv-01945-VC Document 84 Filed 04/08/15 Page 1 of 1