Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01937/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01937-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 625
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Stip and Order to 

Continue Hearing 

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

Attorneys for the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 2:09-CV-01937-GEB-GGH

 )

Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

 ) CONTINUE HEARINGS FOR MOTION 

v. ) TO COMPEL SALE OF DEFENDANT 

 ) REAL PROPERTY AND MOTION TO 

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17 ) QUASH SEARCH WARRANT TO

COON CREEK ROAD, HAWKINS BAR, ) SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

CALIFORNIA, TRINITY COUNTY, )

APN: 008-760-12, INCLUDING ) 

ALL APPURTENANCES AND ) 

IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, )

 ) 

 Defendant. )

________________________________)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the United States of America

through its undersigned counsel, Kevin C. Khasigian, Assistant

United States Attorney, and counsel for claimant Byron Pickle,

Editte Lerman, that:

1. The hearing for the Motion to Compel Sale of Defendant

Real Property and the hearing for the Motion to Quash Search

Warrant to Suppress Evidence and to Dismiss, which are currently

set for September 12, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., with the Court’s

approval, be continued to October 24, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

Case 2:09-cv-01937-GEB-DB Document 41 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 Stip and Order to 

Continue Hearing 

2. Pursuant to Rule G(6)(c), plaintiff need not respond to

a claimant’s motion to dismiss the action until 21 days after the

claimant has answered the propounded special interrogatories. 

Plaintiff served special interrogatories on claimant Byron Pickle

on July 21, 2011 and the responses were due on August 15, 2011. 

If claimant Byron Pickle responds to plaintiff’s special

interrogatories by September 19, 2011, plaintiff will file an

opposition to the motion with the Court on or before October 10,

2011. If responses are not received or received after September

19, 2011, plaintiff will file an opposition 21 days after receipt

of the responses, which may cause the hearing to be continued

again.

Dated: 8/17/11 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

 By: /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian 

KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Dated: 8/17/11 

 

 By: /s/ Editte Lerman 

EDITTE LERMAN

Attorney for Claimant 

Byron Pickle

Dated: 8/17/11 

 

 By: /s/ Edward M. Burch 

EDWARD M. BURCH

Attorney for Claimants 

Leung and Betty K. Chinn

(Original signatures retained 

by attorney)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 19, 2011

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:09-cv-01937-GEB-DB Document 41 Filed 08/19/11 Page 2 of 2