Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00464/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00464-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff, CV F 06 0464 OWW WMW P

vs. FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION 

 RE MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW 

 CAUSE AND TEMPORARY 

 RESTRAINING ORDER (DOC 12 )

JAMES A. YATES, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Pending before the court are

Plaintiff’s motions for a temporary restraining order and a motion for an order to shoe cause. 

This action proceeds against Defendants Yates, Diaz and Beels. Plaintiff’s motion seeks a

restraining order against numerous individuals not named as defendants. Further, no defendant

has been served or entered an appearance in this action. The court must have personal

jurisdiction over the parties to be enjoined; it may not enjoin defendants not yet served or before

the court. Zepeda v. United States I.N.S., 753 F.2d 719, 727 (9 Cir. 1983). th

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s motions for a

temporary restraining and order to show cause order be denied.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

Case 1:06-cv-00464-LJO -WMW Document 13 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9 Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the th

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

j14hj0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00464-LJO -WMW Document 13 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 2