Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-00210/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-00210-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 15-cv-00210 NC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES YTURRALDE, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

AZTEC FORECLOSURE 

CORPORATION, a corporation; 

SABADELL UNITED BANK, N.A., a 

national association; LYDIAN 

MORTGAGE, a corporation; and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 15-cv-00210 NC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

REGARDING DISMISSAL 

On February 4, 2015, defendant Sabadell United Bank filed a motion to dismiss the 

first through eighth claims in the complaint filed by pro se plaintiff James Yturralde. Dkt. 

No. 7. Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) requires parties to file and serve an opposition within 

fourteen days after a motion is filed. In the alternative, a party who does not oppose the 

motion must file a statement of nonopposition with the Court within fourteen days. Civ. 

L.R. 7-3(b). Where, as in this case, the motion was not served through the Court’s 

Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system, see Dkt. No. 7 at 21, these deadlines are extended by 

3 days. Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). While Sabadell United Bank filed an amended notice continuing 

the hearing on the motion to dismiss from March 11 to April 8, 2015, the continuance of 

the hearing does not extend the time for filing the opposing papers. Dkt. No. 13; Civ. L.R. 

7-7(d). 

Case 5:15-cv-00210-LHK Document 19 Filed 03/05/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Case No

ORDER

A

February

local rul

1995). Y

dismiss

eighth c

respond

Yt

magistra

file a co

IT

D

. 15-cv-002

R TO SHOW

ccordingly,

y 23, 2015.

les is a prop

Yturralde h

(or file a st

laims again

will result 

turralde has

ate judge by

nsent or de

T IS SO OR

ate: March 

10 NC 

 CAUSE

, Yturralde’

 Yturralde 

per ground f

has until Ma

atement of 

nst Sabadell

in dismissa

s also failed

y the Februa

clination no

RDERED. 

5, 2015 

s response 

has not file

for dismissa

arch 19, 201

nonopposit

l United Ba

al of those c

d to file a co

ary 25 dead

o later than 

 2

to Sabadell

ed a respons

al.” Ghaza

15, to oppos

tion) and to

ank should n

claims with 

onsent or de

dline previo

March 19, 

 ____ Nath

Unit

l United Ba

se. “Failur

ali v. Moran

se Sabadell

o show caus

not be dism

prejudice.

eclination t

ously set by

2015.

__________ hanael M. C

ted States M

ank’s motio

re to follow 

n, 46 F.3d 5

l United Ba

se why his f

missed. Ytur

o proceed b

y the Court. 

__________ Cousins

Magistrate J

on was due b

a district co

52, 53 (9th C

ank’s motion

first through

rralde’s fail

before a 

 Yturralde 

____

Judge 

by

ourt’s

Cir.

n to 

h

lure to 

must 

Case 5:15-cv-00210-LHK Document 19 Filed 03/05/15 Page 2 of 2