Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00442/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00442-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIE WEAVER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION CONFINEMENT

SHU, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-CV-00442-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH

PREJUDICE, AS DUPLICATIVE OF CASE

NUMBER 1:06-CV-00429-AWI-SMS-P 

(Doc. 1)

Plaintiff Willie Weaver (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on April 17, 2006, and neither paid

the filing fee in full nor filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. On June 14, 2006,

plaintiff was ordered to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $350.00 filing fee

in full within thirty days. After plaintiff failed to comply with or otherwise respond to the Court’s

order, the Court issued a Findings and Recommendations recommending dismissal of this action.

Plaintiff filed objections and an application to proceed in forma pauperis on August 11, 2006.

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is incomplete, as it lacks a prison official’s

signature and lacks a certified copy of plaintiff’s trust account statement. 

In reviewing plaintiff’s complaint, the Court has determined that it is duplicative of case

number 1:06-CV-00429-AWI-SMS-P Weaver v. California Correctional Institution Confinement

SHU, which was filed on April 14, 2006, and dismissed on September 13, 2006, for failure to state

a claim and frivolity. In light of the fact that this action is duplicative of a previously filed action,

Case 1:06-cv-00442-AWI -SMS Document 7 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

rather than address the Findings and Recommendations and Objection thereto, this action is

HEREBY DISMISSED, with prejudice, as duplicative. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 28, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00442-AWI -SMS Document 7 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2