Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00930/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00930-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 423
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157
Cause of Action: 11:101 Bankruptcy

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Wells Fargo Bank National Assoc., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Greenstreet Properties, LLC., et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-10-930-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiff moves the Court to dismiss this case

against the remaining Defendants, Stanley Howard Wasserkrug and Susan Schwartz

Wasserkrug, husband and wife, and as trustees of The Wasserkrug Family Trust (“the

Wasserkrugs”). (Doc. 107.) Pursuant to Rule 54(b), on February 28, 2012, a Judgment was

entered against all other Defendants. (Doc. 96.) The parties originally intended for the

Judgment to be entered against the Wasserkrugs as well, but the Wasserkrugs filed for

bankruptcy protection under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on December

21, 2011, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada, Case No. 11-29314-lbr. A

Notice of Bankruptcy was filed on December 29, 2011. (Doc. 88.) Due to the automatic stay

provisions of 11 U.S.C. 362, Plaintiff indicates that its only option is to dismiss the case

without prejudice. (Doc. 107.)

Rule 41(a)(2) allows for dismissal by court order upon a plaintiff’s request “on terms

that the court considers proper.” Rule 41(a)(2). A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule

41(a)(2) is addressed to the district court’s sound discretion. Stevedoring Servs. of Am. v.

Case 2:10-cv-00930-SMM Document 108 Filed 06/18/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Armilla Int’l B.V., 889 F.2d 919, 921 (9th Cir. 1989). Pursuant to Plaintiff’s terms and

request, the Court will grant its motion to dismiss this case without prejudice.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss this case without

prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). (Doc. 107.)

DATED this 17th day of June, 2013.

Case 2:10-cv-00930-SMM Document 108 Filed 06/18/13 Page 2 of 2