Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06510/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06510-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

T.C. JEFFERSON, on behalf of

himself and all those

similarly situated,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-6510 TEH (BZ)

SECOND DISCOVERY ORDER

Before me is plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery

responses. The motion having been fully briefed and argued,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s request for further responses to Special

Interrogatory No.’s 9, 10 and 11 is DENIED because the chart

produced by defendant is an adequate response to No.’s 9 and

11, and because No. 10 is premature. 

2. Plaintiff’s request for production of further

documents in response to Document Request No. 15 is GRANTED to

the extent it requests customer complaints and Chase’s

responses to those complaints. Plaintiff seeks to represent a

Case 3:06-cv-06510-TEH Document 82 Filed 05/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

class of all California residents who prepaid, not just those

who prepaid electronically. Defendant’s objections are more

properly asserted in opposition to class certification.

3. Plaintiff’s request for production of further

documents in response to Document Request No.’s 3, 12, 13, 14,

and 16 is DENIED on condition that defendant certify in

writing, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, that it has

produced all responsive documents.

4. Plaintiff’s request for further responses to Special

Interrogatory No.’s 1, 3 and 6 is DENIED based on defendant’s

representation that responses will be produced by May 17,

2007.

5. Defendant shall produce to plaintiff documents

responsive to Document Request No. 15 and the certification

referenced in paragraph 3, above, by Wednesday, May 23, 2007.

6. Should defendant fail to timely produce promised

responses or otherwise fail to abide by this order, plaintiff

shall pursue the matter as outlined in my Initial Discovery

Order. 

Dated: May 16, 2007

Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\JEFFERSON\Second DISC ORDER.wpd

Case 3:06-cv-06510-TEH Document 82 Filed 05/16/07 Page 2 of 2