Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04620/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04620-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

-1- 

 PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; (PROPOSED) ORDER [CASE NO. C-06-4620 CRB]

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

James P. Watson (SBN 046127) 

Bruce K. Leigh (SBN 129753) 

Anne Bevington (SBN 111320) 

STANTON, KAY & WATSON, LLP 

101 New Montgomery Street, Fifth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 512-3501 

Facsimile: (415) 512-3515 

Email: anneb@skwsf.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS 

HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

ROBERT A. BOTHMAN, INC., a California 

corporation, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C-06-4620 CRB 

PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST 

FOR DIMISSAL; 

(PROPOSED) ORDER 

The parties having settled the claims contained in plaintiffs’ complaint in this action, 

plaintiffs request that the action be dismissed, with all parties bearing their own costs except as 

provided in the settlement agreement. Because defendants did not appear in the action, this 

request is not made by stipulation and is unopposed. 

DATED: January 22, 2007. STANTON, KAY & WATSON, LLP 

 By: /s/ Anne Bevington Anne Bevington 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 3:06-cv-04620-CRB Document 10 Filed 01/25/07 Page 1 of 3
 -2- 

 PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; (PROPOSED) ORDER [CASE NO. C-06-4620 CRB]

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

ORDER 

The Court having considered plaintiffs’ unopposed request for dismissal, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Action be, and hereby is, dismissed with 

prejudice, with all parties bearing their own costs except as provided in the settlement 

agreement. 

DATED: ______________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

F:\CASES\7000\7000.1059 Robert A Bothman Inc - Aachwen\Pleadings\REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL and PROPOSED ORDER.doc

January 24, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-04620-CRB Document 10 Filed 01/25/07 Page 2 of 3
 -3- 

 PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; (PROPOSED) ORDER [CASE NO. C-06-4620 CRB]

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE

CASE NAME: Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund 

For Northern California; et al. v. Robert A. Bothman, Inc., et al.

CASE NUMBER: United States District Court, Northern District of California 

 No. C-06-4620 (CRB) 

 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California. I am over the age 

of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 101 New Montgomery Street, Fifth 

Floor, San Francisco, California 94105. 

 On the date shown below, I served the following document(s) described as: 

PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR DIMISSAL; 

(PROPOSED) ORDER 

on the following party/parties: 

Krisztina M. Kiss, Esq. 

Contacts Manager/Corporate Counsel 

Robert A. Bothman, Inc. 

650 Quinn Avenue 

San Jose, CA 95112 

BY MAIL with postage thereon fully prepaid in the designated area for outgoing mail. I am readily 

familiar with STANTON, KAY & Watson’s practice of collection and processing correspondence 

whereby mail is sealed, given the appropriate postage and placed in a designated mail collection area. 

Each day’s mail is collected and deposited with the United States Postal Service after the close of each 

day’s business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal 

cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in 

affidavit. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

above is true and correct and that this Declaration is executed on January 22, 2007 at San Francisco, 

California. 

 

/s/ Carol M. Christensen 

Carol M. Christensen 

Case 3:06-cv-04620-CRB Document 10 Filed 01/25/07 Page 3 of 3