Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04330/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04330-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

Case No. C07 04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL J. BERGESON, Bar No. 105439

dbergeson@be-law.com

JOHN W. FOWLER, Bar No. 037463

jfowler@be-law.com

MELINDA M. MORTON, Bar No. 209373

mmorton@be-law.com

BERGESON, LLP

303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500

San Jose, CA 95110-2712

Telephone: (408) 291-6200

Facsimile: (408) 297-6000

Attorneys for Plaintiff

VERIGY US, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

VERIGY US, INC, a Delaware Corporation

Plaintiff,

vs.

ROMI OMAR MAYDER, an individual;

WESLEY MAYDER, an individual; SILICON

TEST SYSTEMS, INC., a California Corporation;

and SILICON TEST SOLUTIONS, LLC, a

California Limited Liability Corporation,

inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. C07 04330 RMW (HRL)

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING

SCHEDULE FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

Complaint Filed: August 22, 2007

Trial Date: None Set

*E-FILED - 10/30/07*

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 86 Filed 10/30/07 Page 1 of 3
1

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

Case No. C07 04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

Plaintiff, Verigy US, Inc. (“Verigy”), by and through its counsel of record, Bergeson, LLP and

Defendants Romi Omar Mayder, an individual, Wesley Mayder, an individual, Silicon Test

Systems, Inc. a California Corporation, Silicon Test Solutions, LLC (“Defendants”) by and

through their counsel of record, Mount & Stoelker, PC, do hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS this Court issued an order on August 24, 2007 (Order Granting Plaintiff Verigy

US, Inc.’s Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order Authoring Expedited

Discovery; Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction) (“the Order”); and

WHEREAS this Court issued an order on September 19, 2007 modifying the Briefing

Schedule and hearing on the order to show cause re: preliminary injunction (Docket No. 33); and

WHEREAS the parties now wish to modify the September 19, 2007 Order, and request court

approval of the following hearing and briefing schedule:

1. The hearing on the order to appear and show cause why a preliminary injunction should

not be entered against Defendants shall be continued to Friday, December 14, 2007 at

9:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the Court may hear the matter.

2. Plaintiff shall file and serve any reply and/or supplemental papers of up to twenty-five

(25) pages in support of its motion for preliminary injunction by November 16, 2007 at

5:00 p.m.

3. Defendants may file and serve a sur-reply of up to seventeen (17) pages in support of

its opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction by November 30, 2007 at 5:00

p.m.

4. In all other respects, the Order remains in effect and is extended until the Court enters a

decision on the preliminary injunction set for hearing on December 14, 2007 unless

prior to that date and time, the Order is vacated or extended by this court for good cause

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 86 Filed 10/30/07 Page 2 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

Case No. C07 04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

shown, or unless Plaintiff and Defendants stipulate to such extension or vacation, such

stipulation being subject to the court’s approval.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: October 19, 2007 BERGESON, LLP

By: /s/

Melinda M. Morton, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff Verigy

Dated: October 19, 2007 MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C.

By: ________________________________________

Daniel Mount, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

In accordance with the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and with good cause appearing

therefor, the Court enters the Stipulation as an Order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2007 By: __________________________

Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge

10/30

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 86 Filed 10/30/07 Page 3 of 3