Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00795/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00795-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOB SAVAGE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CDCR, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-0795 JAM CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On May 4, 2015, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. On June 2, 

2015, plaintiff was granted an extension of time until August 10, 2015 to respond to defendants’ 

motion. On August 21, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of nonopposition to the pending motion within thirty days. In the same order, plaintiff was informed 

that failure to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition would result in a recommendation 

that this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The thirty day period has now 

expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. His last filing in this action was on 

May 28, 2015. 

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 

dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

////

Case 2:13-cv-00795-JAM-CKD Document 55 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: September 29, 2015

2 / sava0795.46fr

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:13-cv-00795-JAM-CKD Document 55 Filed 09/29/15 Page 2 of 2