Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01301/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01301-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

OHS West:260954073.2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

RADIOSHACK AND AERIELLE’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT, CASE NO. CV 10-01301 SBA

ROBERT W. DICKERSON, CA Bar No. 089367

rdickerson@orrick.com 

YASSER EL-GAMAL, CA Bar No. 189047 

ymel-gamal@orrick.com 

ALYSSA M. CARIDIS, CA Bar No. 260103 

acaridis@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

777 South Figueroa Street, 32nd floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Telephone: 213-612-2020 

Facsimile: 213-612-2499 

JEFFREY A. MILLER, CA Bar No. 160602 

jmiller@orrick.com 

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE, CA Bar No. 173985 

nchatterjee@orrick.com 

MATTHEW J. HULT, CA Bar No. 197137 

matthult@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: 650-614-7400 

Facsimile: 650-614-7401 

Attorneys for Defendants 

RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

AERIELLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., BEST 

BUY CO., INC., BESTBUY.COM, LLC and 

RADIOSHACK CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No. CV 10-01301 SBA 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING RADIOSHACK AND 

AERIELLE’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Case 5:10-cv-01301-LHK Document 43 Filed 08/02/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

OHS West:260954073.2 - 1 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

RADIOSHACK AND AERIELLE’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT, CASE NO. CV 10-01301 SBA

On March 26, 2010, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Aerielle Technologies, Inc. 

(“Aerielle”) filed its Complaint For Patent Infringement (“Complaint”) [D.I. 1], alleging 

infringement of United States Patents Numbers 5,771,441 and 6,671,494 by Defendants and 

Counterclaim Plaintiffs Belkin International, Inc. (“Belkin”), Best Buy Co., Inc. (“Best Buy”), 

BestBuy.com LLC (“BestBuy.com”), and RadioShack Corporation (“RadioShack”). 

On June 4, 2010, Belkin timely filed its Answer And Counterclaims to Aerielle’s 

Complaint [D.I. 15]. 

On June 14, 2010, Best Buy and BestBuy.com timely filed their Answer And 

Counterclaims responding to Aerielle’s Complaint [D.I. 19]. 

On June 14, 2010, RadioShack timely filed its Answer And Counterclaims responding to 

Aerielle’s Complaint [D.I. 17]. 

On June 28, 2010, Aerielle timely filed its response to Belkin’s Counterclaims [D.I. 28 ]. 

On July 9, 2010, Aerielle timely filed its responses to RadioShack’s and 

BestBuy/Bestbuy.com’s respective Counterclaims [D.I. 34 & 33]. 

On July 9, 2010, Aerielle also timely filed its First Amended Complaint For Patent 

Infringement [D.I. 32] (“First Amended Complaint”), in which Aerielle named a new Defendant, 

Best Buy Stores, L.P., and added infringement claims against Best Buy Stores, L.P. regarding the 

same to two patents originally asserted in Aerielle’s Complaint. Nothing in the First Amended 

Complaint modified the allegations made against Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff 

RadioShack Corporation (“RadioShack”), except for changes to the numbering of the allegations 

made against RadioShack and of the paragraphs containing as such allegations and related 

prayers. 

Accordingly, the parties have agreed that, in order to avoid unnecessary pleadings and 

related costs, RadioShack’s original Answer And Counterclaims [D.I. 17] can be deemed 

RadioShack’s timely response to Aerielle’s First Amended Complaint, and Aerielle’s original 

response to RadioShack’s Counterclaims [D.I. 34] can be deemed Aerielle’s timely response to 

the counterclaims RadioShack asserts in its response to Aerielle’s First Amended Complaint. 

Case 5:10-cv-01301-LHK Document 43 Filed 08/02/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

OHS West:260954073.2 - 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

RADIOSHACK AND AERIELLE’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT, CASE NO. CV 10-01301 SBA

To the extent that the Court rejects this stipulation and does not enter the attached 

Proposed Order, the parties agree to negotiate a reasonable schedule that will allow RadioShack 

sufficient time to file a response to Aerielle’s First Amended Complaint and allow Aerielle 

sufficient time to file responses to RadioShack’s counterclaims as presented in RadioShack’s 

response to Aerielle’s First Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: July 26, 2010 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

/s/ Matthew J. Hult /s/ 

Matthew J. Hult 

Attorneys for Defendant 

RadioShack Corporation 

Dated: July 26, 2010 DLA PIPER US LLP 

/s/ Marc Belloli /s/ 

Marc Belloli 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Aerielle Technologies, Inc. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 8/2/10 

Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong 

United States District Court Judge 

Northern District of California

Case 5:10-cv-01301-LHK Document 43 Filed 08/02/10 Page 3 of 3