Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07315/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07315-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7315

ROY HUNT, JR., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

SANDHIR, M.D., Powhatan Correctional Center; THOMPSON, M.D., 

Wallens Ridge State Prison; LUCY DOSSETT, M.D., 

International Radiology Group, LLC; STANFORD, Registered 

Nurse, Wallens Ridge State Prison; COLLINS, Registered 

Nurse, Wallens Ridge State Prison; CLARK, Registered Nurse, 

Wallens Ridge State Prison; BROWN, Correctional Officer 

Sergeant, Wallens Ridge State Prison; DAVID ROBINSON, 

Warden, Wallens Ridge State Prison; FRED SCHILLING, Health 

Service Director; KING, M.D.; A. WARREN, 

 Defendants – Appellees, 

 and 

JOHN DOE, on 2/23/06 M.D., Powhatan Correctional Center; A. 

J. UNKNOWN, on 2/2/06, M.D., Powhatan Correctional Center, 

 Defendants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior 

District Judge. (3:06-cv-00539-RLW) 

Submitted: January 26, 2010 Decided: February 9, 2010 

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

Appeal: 09-7315 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/09/2010 Pg: 1 of 3
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Roy Hunt, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY 

LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia; Rodney Seth Dillman, HANCOCK, 

DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Susan 

Bland Curwood, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 

Appeal: 09-7315 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/09/2010 Pg: 2 of 3
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Roy Hunt, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Hunt v. Sandhir, No. 3:06-cv-00539-RLW (E.D. Va. 

June 30, 2009). We deny Hunt’s motions for appointment of 

counsel and summary disposition. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7315 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/09/2010 Pg: 3 of 3