Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03836/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03836-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NSIGHT, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

PEOPLESOFT, INC.,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 04-3836 MMC (MEJ)

ORDER PERMITTING PARTIES TO

MEET AND CONFER BY

TELEPHONE

On January 17, 2006, the undersigned conducted a telephonic discovery conference

regarding the parties' inability to meet and confer in person. Pursuant to discussions at the

conference, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's request to meet and confer by telephone. 

However, should it become apparent that the parties are not honoring the spirit of the meet and

confer requirement, the Court shall order them to meet and confer in person.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03836-MMC Document 83 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 1