Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_98-cv-02164/USCOURTS-azd-2_98-cv-02164-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Murray Hooper, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

No. CV-98-02164-PHX-SMM

 DEATH PENALTY CASE 

 O R D E R 

Pending before the Court is Murray Hooper’s Stipulation for Order Allowing 

Confidential Contact Visit with Petitioner. (Doc. 153.) Mr. Hooper’s counsel and 

counsel for the Arizona Department of Corrections (“ADOC”) have now stipulated to 

the terms of the order allowing a confidential contact visit between Mr. Hooper and Dr. 

Robert Heilbronner, a psychologist. 

Mr. Hooper, through counsel, has requested that ADOC allow Dr. Heilbronner 

to have a confidential contact visit with Mr. Hooper. Mr. Hooper, a death row inmate, 

is currently housed in the Browning Unit, a maximum security prison facility located in 

the Arizona State Prison Complex, Eyman, in Florence, Arizona. Because of the nature 

of the prisoners housed in this facility, Browning Unit has a no-contact-visit policy 

Case 2:98-cv-02164-SMM Document 155 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 5
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

absent a court order. The Ninth Circuit has held that ADOC’s non-contact visitation 

policy at its high security prisons is rationally related to its legitimate penological 

concerns. Casey v. Lewis, 4 F.3d 1516, 1523 (9th Cir. 1993) (“The ADOC policy is a 

reasonable response to the legitimate institutional concerns posed by full contact 

visitation: prevention of escape, assault, hostage-taking, and the introduction of 

contraband.”). Mr. Hooper, through counsel, acknowledges that ADOC has a 

legitimate penological interest in requiring that any contact visit be conditioned on 

following certain security measures. To assist this Court in determining the extent of 

the visitation/examination, as well as to protect ADOC’s interest in securing its prisons, 

the limitations on the visit are listed below. 

IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation for Order Allowing Confidential Contact 

Visit with Petitioner is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Dr. Robert Heilbronner be permitted to have a 

confidential contact visit with Mr. Hooper for psychological evaluation under the 

following terms: 

1. Visitation shall take place on June 11, 2015, from 9:00a.m. to 3:00p.m. 

each day. 

2. Mr. Hooper’s counsel affirms that he made advance arrangements with 

Warden James O’Neil (“the Warden”), Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex 

Browning Unit, or his designee, to schedule such visits. 

3. Mr. Hooper’s counsel affirms that Warden O’Neil, or his designee has 

agreed that Dr. Heilbronner is permitted to bring pens and pencils, a notepad, clipboard, 

Case 2:98-cv-02164-SMM Document 155 Filed 05/18/15 Page 2 of 5
- 3 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

stopwatch, test manuals, response sheets, cardboard cards, a finger tapping apparatus, 

grooved pegboard. The Warden, through his staff, may require Dr. Heilbronner to 

subject all instruments, equipment, manuals and the like to an inspection and inventory 

prior to and subsequent to any meeting with Mr. Hooper. 

4. If requested by Dr. Heilbronner, the Warden, through his staff, shall 

remove handcuffs from Mr. Hooper so that Mr. Hooper may complete certain tests. 

However, Mr. Hooper shall at all times remain in leg irons. ADOC may require Mr. 

Hooper to wear a stun belt during the meetings. 

5. Both Mr. Hooper and ADOC recognize that Mr. Hooper’s decision not to 

contest ADOC’s practice of using a stun belt on Mr. Hooper is due to the time 

constraints placed upon Mr. Hooper’s counsel and in no way constitutes a waiver of the 

“stun belt issue” in any future request for a contact visit in this case or in another case. 

ADOC’s willingness to stipulate hereto should not be considered a waiver of any aspect 

of ADOC’s non-contact visitation policy. 

6. Dr. Heilbronner will be required to wear all protective gear, including any 

protective vest and/or safety goggles provided by ADOC. Dr. Heilbronner will be 

allowed to wear a suit jacket over the protective vest. If requested, Dr. Heilbronner 

shall be allowed to remove the protective vest and safety goggles if, in his opinion, the 

vest and/or the goggles interfere with the testing and evaluation of Mr. Hooper. 

7. The meetings between Mr. Hooper and Dr. Heilbronner shall be 

confidential and take place in a room that allows for privacy. The room in which the 

meetings take place shall have a door that remains closed during the meeting. The 

Case 2:98-cv-02164-SMM Document 155 Filed 05/18/15 Page 3 of 5
- 4 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

room may have windows which allow the Warden, through his staff, to observe the 

meeting. Dr. Heilbronner shall sit in the chair closest to the door, and Mr. Hooper shall 

not go between him and the door without permission. The room in which the meetings 

take place shall have three chairs and a table no larger than three feet in width. 

8. Dr. Heilbronner shall be allowed to have physical contact with Mr. 

Hooper as is necessary to conduct testing. 

9. Before being allowed the contact visit authorized herein, Dr. Heilbronner 

shall certify in a written release to ADOC that he has investigated and ascertained the 

risks to his personal safety associated with the visit as authorized by and under the 

circumstances described in this order; that he agrees to assume those risks; that he 

releases and holds harmless ADOC, the state of Arizona, and their officers and 

employees from any claim arising from death or injury associated with the risks 

assumed. However, such release shall not operate as a release of gross negligence on 

the part of ADOC. 

10. Dr. Heilbronner has submitted his full name, date of birth and social 

security number to ADOC. In the event that he has had a prior arrest or conviction for 

any felony offense, he will not be permitted into the institution. 

11. ADOC’s willingness to stipulate to the contact visit hereto shall not be 

considered a waiver of any aspect of ADOC’s non-contact visitation policy. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court forward a copy of this Order 

to counsel of record; and to Michael Gottfried, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona 

Department of Corrections, 1275 West Washington, Phoenix, AZ 85007; and to Warden 

Case 2:98-cv-02164-SMM Document 155 Filed 05/18/15 Page 4 of 5
- 5 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

James O’Neil, Arizona State Prison, Eyman Prison Complex, Browning Unit, 4374 East 

Butte Avenue, Florence, Arizona 85232. 

 DATED this 14th day of May, 2015. 

Honorable Stephen M. McNamee

Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:98-cv-02164-SMM Document 155 Filed 05/18/15 Page 5 of 5