Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00903/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00903-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, ORDER THEREON

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Attorneys for Defendants, ROCHELLE K. SARGENTINI; NORMAN DEAN KATO, dba 

BOB’S MARKET

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CECIL SHAW,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT A. SARGENTINI; ROCHELLE K. 

SARGENTINI; NORMAN DEAN KATO dba 

BOB’S MARKET; BOB’S MARKET, a 

California corporation;,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-00903-LJO-GSA

THIRD STIPULATION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

ROCHELLE K. SARGENTINI AND 

NORMAN DEAN KATO dba BOB’S 

MARKET TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT; STIPULATION TO 

CONTINUE MANDATORY 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

ORDER THEREON

 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Complaint was served upon Defendant ROCHELLE K. 

SARGENTINI (herein “Sargentini”) and NORMAN DEAN KATO, dba BOB’S MARKET 

(herein “Kato”) (collectively “Defendants”).

WHEREAS, Defendants’ Answer to the Complaint was due on August 11, 2014.

WHEREAS Plaintiff previously granted Defendants an extension of time to 

respond to the complaint to October 6, 2014.

WHEREAS Plaintiff previously granted Defendants a second extension of time 

to respond to the complaint to October 31, 2014.

Roger S. Bonakdar, #253920

2344 TULARE ST., SUITE 301

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721

PHONE (559) 495-1545

FAX (559) 495-1527

Case 1:14-cv-00903-LJO-EPG Document 18 Filed 11/07/14 Page 1 of 4
2

THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS the parties are desirous of exploring an early resolution and 

settlement of this matter, the parties believe it to be mutually desirable to avoid further 

costs of litigation to discuss and explore a resolution.

WHEREAS the parties wish to conserve party and court resources so that they 

may be applied towards a resolution.

WHEREAS the Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently set for 

November 10, 2014.

WHEREAS Defendants hereby agree that they will obtain a CASp inspection of 

the subject property within two (2) weeks of the filing of this Stipulation.

WHEREAS the parties are optimistic that a report regarding the CASp 

inspection will be provided to Defendants within 30 days of filing this Stipulation, at 

which point Defendants will engage Plaintiff in settlement discussions seeking a 

resolution of his claims.

WHEREAS in light of the foregoing, the parties believe it appropriate to 

continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference for sixty (60) days (or to a date 

convenient to the Court after January 12, 2015), in order to accomplish the CASp 

inspection, generate a report, and explore settlement.

WHEREAS in light of the foregoing, the parties also believe it appropriate to 

continue the last date by which Defendants may file their answer to Plaintiff’s 

complaint to December 19, 2014.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff 

CECIL SHAW (herein “Plaintiff”) and Defendants ROCHELLE K. SARGENTINI and 

NORMAN DEAN KATO dba BOB’S MARKET (collectively herein “Defendants”), by 

and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

Case 1:14-cv-00903-LJO-EPG Document 18 Filed 11/07/14 Page 2 of 4
3

THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

144(a), Defendants’ Answer or Response to Complaint, due on October 31, 2014, is 

now due on or before December 19, 2014.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between attorneys for the 

respective parties herein that the Scheduling Conference be continued to a date at 

least sixty days from the filing of this Stipulation (or to a date convenient to the Court 

after January 12, 2015).

Date: November 3, 2014 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

CECIL SHAW

Date: November 3, 2014 BONAKDAR LAW FIRM

/s/ Roger S. Bonakdar

ROGER S. BONAKDAR

Attorney for Defendant, 

Lila Pablo-Martinez

Date: November 3, 2014 /s/ Paul C. Franco

PAUL C. FRANCO

Attorney for Defendant, 

Bob’s Market, Inc.

Case 1:14-cv-00903-LJO-EPG Document 18 Filed 11/07/14 Page 3 of 4
4

THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants ROCHELLE K. SARGENTINI and 

NORMAN DEAN KATO dba BOB’S MARKET (collectively herein “Defendants”) shall 

file their Answer or Response to Complaint on or before December 19, 2014.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference scheduled herein 

for November 10, 2014, is hereby continued to January 21, 2015 at 9:30 a.m., in 

Courtroom 10 before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. The parties shall file a Joint 

Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 6, 2014 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00903-LJO-EPG Document 18 Filed 11/07/14 Page 4 of 4