Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00294/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00294-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY CAMPBELL

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0294 DFL CMK P

vs.

J. SCOGIN, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This

proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 72-302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

On October 28, 2005, the court ordered the plaintiff to show cause why the court should not

dismiss plaintiff’s case for failure to truthfully declare the number of lawsuits that he had filed

prior to filing the instant action. Plaintiff was ordered to describe the outcome of each of his

previous lawsuits. 

On November 10, 2005, plaintiff filed his response. He failed to describe the

outcome of each of his lawsuits and instead states that he has filed “69 suits in the Eastern

District” and that he is still awaiting a response on his “39 earlier suits.” He further states that he

was not untruthful when he failed to list his prior lawsuits but rather failed to list his prior suits

because he suffers from mental illness, is on medication and is undergoing psychiatric treatment. 

Case 2:05-cv-00294-DFL-CMK Document 6 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has not complied with the court’s order as he has not provided any

information about the disposition of his prior lawsuits. Plaintiff was warned that failure to

respond in accordance with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT this action be dismissed with prejudice. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fifteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 5, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00294-DFL-CMK Document 6 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 2