Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-01066/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-01066-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

SAPP v. ALAMEDA COUNTY, et al. Case No. 03-1066 PJH 

[Proposed] Order Granting Def.’s Mot. To Compel Further Responses Sapp/p/PropOrd.072705 

- 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Nancy E. Hudgins, SBN 85222 

Matthew M. Grigg, SBN 195951 

LAW OFFICES OF NANCY E. HUDGINS 

565 Commercial Street, Fourth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 979-0100 

Fax: (415) 979-0747 

Attorneys for Defendants County of Alameda, 

County of Alameda Sheriff’s Department, 

Sheriff Charles Plummer, and Prison Health Services 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAMON JERMAINE SAPP, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, COUNTY OF 

ALAMEDA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, 

SHERIFF CHARLES PLUMMER, sued 

herein individually and in his capacity and as 

Sheriff, Alameda County, PRISON 

HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ALAMEDA 

COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER dba 

HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, and DOES 1 

through 30, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 03-1066 PJH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

MOTION TO COMPEL

The motion to compel further responses to interrogatories (served on Plaintiff Ramon 

Sapp by Defendants Prison Health Services, Inc., Alameda County Sheriff’s Department and 

Sheriff Charles Plummer in September of 2004) was heard on July 26, 2005. Having carefully 

considered all papers submitted and the argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS 

defendants’ motion. 

Case 4:03-cv-01066-PJH Document 73 Filed 07/28/05 Page 1 of 2
SAPP v. ALAMEDA COUNTY, et al. Case No. 03-1066 PJH 

[Proposed] Order Granting Def.’s Mot. To Compel Further Responses Sapp/p/PropOrd.072705 

- 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff shall serve full and complete responses to defendants’ interrogatories by 5:00 

p.m. on July 30, 2005. Pursuant to the agreement of counsel said responses shall be served via 

email on the moving defendants’ counsel at mmg@hudginslaw.com. 

Defendants’ request for sanctions was not separately noticed as required by the Local 

Rules, and thus is denied without prejudice. 

SO ORDERED this ___ day of July, 2005. 

_______________________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

28

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 4:03-cv-01066-PJH Document 73 Filed 07/28/05 Page 2 of 2