Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00829/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00829-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

N:\Pro - Se\5.25.2007\07-00829 Cramer0829_dismissal.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BILLY E. CRAMER III,

Petitioner,

 vs.

WILLIAM DUNCAN, Warden,

Respondent.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 07-00829 JW (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On February 8, 2007, petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a

motion to subpoena records from the State of California Supreme Court. Petitioner

did not attach either a complaint or a petition to the motion. On the same day, the

clerk sent a notice to petitioner that he must submit either a complaint or a petition

within thirty days or the action would be dismissed. The clerk also notified

petitioner that he must either submit an In Forma Pauperis application or pay the full

filing fees within thirty days or the action would be dismissed. 

Although petitioner failed to respond with the appropriate filings during the

thirty days, this Court, by order filed April 20, 2007, granted petitioner an additional

Case 5:07-cv-00829-JW Document 11 Filed 05/25/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

N:\Pro - Se\5.25.2007\07-00829 Cramer0829_dismissal.wpd 2

thirty days to comply and provided petitioner with copies of the court’s form

complaint, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and an In Forma Pauperis

application. Petitioner was further advised that FAILURE TO FILE A TIMELY

RESPONSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN

THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE.

The deadline has since passed, and petitioner has failed to file either a

complaint or a petition in compliance with the Court’s orders. Petitioner’s letter

filed May 8, 2007, addressed to the California State Supreme Court requesting that

his case be transferred to federal court, and another letter filed May 10, 2007

requesting a patent are not sufficient responses for this Court to proceed with the

case as an action filed pursuant to either 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as a civil rights complaint

or 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, this case

is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk shall close the file.

 

DATED: May 25 2007 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge 

Case 5:07-cv-00829-JW Document 11 Filed 05/25/07 Page 2 of 2