Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02454-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rubinstein Law Group 

A Professional Law Corporation

Yano Rubinstein, Cal. Bar No. 214277 

Joseph J. Zynczak Cal. Bar No. 209094 

116 New Montgomery Street, Suite 742 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 277-1900 

Facsimile: (415) 277-1919 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

Storus Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

STORUS CORPORATION, a California 

Corporation

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC. a 

Delaware Corporation; AROA 

MARKETING, INC., a California 

Corporation, DBA GADGET UNIVERSE,

SKYMALL, INC. and DOES 1 through 20, 

inclusive, 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Defendants.

_____________________________________

AROA MARKETING, INC.; AND 

SKYMALL, INC., 

 Counter-claimants, 

vs.

STORUS CORPORATION, a California 

corporation,

 Counter-defendant. 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC 

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 1 of 14
 -2- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted. 

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 

Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 

all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the 

limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as 

confidential. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 10, below, that this 

Stipulated Protective Order creates no entitlement to file confidential information under seal; Civil 

Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards that will 

be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 

2. DEFINITIONS 

2.1. Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 

consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff).

2.2. Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or 

manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 

transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 

discovery in this matter. 

2.3. “Confidential” Information or Items: information (regardless of how generated, stored or 

maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under standards developed under 

F.R.Civ.P. 26(c). 

2.4. “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or Items: extremely sensitive 

“Confidential Information or Items” whose disclosure to another Party or nonparty would 

create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive 

means. 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 2 of 14
 -3- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2.5. Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing 

Party.

2.6. Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in 

this action. 

2.7. Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or items that it 

produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

2.8. Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 

“Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

2.9. Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are retained to 

represent or advise a Party in this action. 

2.10. House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party.

2.11. Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well as their support 

staffs). 

2.12. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 

litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as 

a consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or of a 

competitor of a Party’s and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an 

employee of a Party or a competitor of a Party’s. This definition includes a professional 

jury or trial consultant retained in connection with this litigation. 

2.13. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., 

photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; organizing, 

storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and 

subcontractors.

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 3 of 14
 -4- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 

(as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, 

excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by 

parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material. 

4. DURATION

Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 

Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 

otherwise directs. 

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 

5.1. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or nonparty that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to 

limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate 

standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts 

of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that 

other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection 

is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are 

shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose unnecessary 

expenses and burdens on other parties), expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items that it 

designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 4 of 14
 -5- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

of protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other 

parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 

5.2. Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., 

second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material 

that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 

material is disclosed or produced. 

Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 

(a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions or 

other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” at 

the top of each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the 

material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 

the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must 

specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” 

or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). 

A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for 

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has 

indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and 

before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party 

has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must 

determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, 

then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the 

appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) at the top of each page that contains Protected Material. If 

only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 5 of 14
 -6- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 

markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being 

asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY”). 

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that 

the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, before 

the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and 

further specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 

– ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” When it is impractical to identify separately each portion 

of testimony that is entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of 

the testimony may qualify for protection, the Party or non-party that sponsors, offers, or 

gives the testimony may invoke on the record (before the deposition or proceeding is 

concluded) a right to have up to 20 days to identify the specific portions of the testimony 

as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted 

(“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). 

Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within 

the 20 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by the 

court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” 

or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as instructed by the 

Party or nonparty offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony. 

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for any 

other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of 

the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If 

only portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 6 of 14
 -7- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

extent practicable, shall identify the protected portions, specifying whether they qualify as 

“Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

5.3. Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate 

qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ 

Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure 

protection under this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” after the material was 

initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation, must 

make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the 

provisions of this Order. 

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 

6.1. Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality 

designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary 

economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does 

not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a 

challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 

6.2. Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating Party’s 

confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by 

conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not 

sufficient) with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party 

must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and 

must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to 

reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the 

basis for the chosen designation. A challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the 

challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first. 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 7 of 14
 -8- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6.3. Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a confidentiality 

designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party may file 

and serve a motion under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-

5, if applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for 

the challenge. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that 

affirms that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in 

the preceding paragraph and that sets forth with specificity the justification for the 

confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating Party in the meet and confer 

dialogue.

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating 

Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the material 

in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s 

designation.

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

7.1. Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or 

produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for 

prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may 

be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this 

Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the 

provisions of section 11, below (FINAL DISPOSITION). Protected Material must be 

stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that 

ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 

7.2. Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the 

court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any 

information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to: 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 8 of 14
 -9- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of 

said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and 

who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is attached hereto as 

Exhibit A; 

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving 

Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 

“Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

(c) experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

(d) the Court and its personnel;

(e) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably 

necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective 

Order” (Exhibit A); 

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably 

necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A). 

Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material 

must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as 

permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order. 

(g) the author of the document or the original source of the information. 

7.3. Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or 

Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating 

Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 9 of 14
 -10- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of 

said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and 

who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is attached hereto as 

Exhibit A; 

(b) Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this 

litigation, (2) who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A),

(c) the Court and its personnel;

(d) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably 

necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective 

Order” (Exhibit A); and

(e) the author of the document or the original source of the information. 

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER 

LITIGATION. 

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that 

would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the 

Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) immediately 

and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification 

must include a copy of the subpoena or court order. 

The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who caused the 

subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the 

subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must 

deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the Party in the other action that 

caused the subpoena or order to issue. The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the 

interested parties to the existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in 

this case an opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 10 of 14
 -11- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

subpoena or order issued. The Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of 

seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions 

should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a 

lawful directive from another court. 

9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective 

Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the 

unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, (c) 

inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this 

Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to 

Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

10. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL. Without written permission from the Designating 

Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file 

in the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 

Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. 

11. FINAL DISPOSITION. Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing 

Party, within sixty days after the final termination of this action, each Receiving Party must return 

all Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” 

includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or 

capturing any of the Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating Party, 

the Receiving Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. 

Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a 

written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the 

Designating Party) by the sixty day deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 11 of 14
 -12- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not 

retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing 

any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an 

archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or 

attorney work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies 

that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in 

Section 4 (DURATION), above. 

12. MISCELLANEOUS

12.1. Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to 

seek its modification by the Court in the future. Right to Assert Other Objections. By 

stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise 

would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground 

not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to 

object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective 

Order.

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 12 of 14
Dated: March 8, 2007

March 5 /ylr/

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 13 of 14
 -14- 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT A 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 

I, __________________________, of ___________________________________ 

___________________________________________ [full address], declare under penalty of 

perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was 

issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on 

_________________ in the case of STORUS CORPORATION, a California Corporation v. 

RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC. a Delaware Corporation; Case No. C-06-2454 MMC. I 

agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I 

understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and 

punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner 

any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity 

except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the 

jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for the 

purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement 

proceedings occur after termination of this action. 

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 

_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] 

as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings 

related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

Date: _________________________________ 

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ 

Printed name: ______________________________ 

Signature: __________________________________ 

Case No. C-06-2454 MMC

Case 3:06-cv-02454-MMC Document 75 Filed 03/08/07 Page 14 of 14