Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02518/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02518-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-2518 FCD DAD P

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 22, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

Case 2:03-cv-02518-DAD Document 112 Filed 09/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 22, 2007 are adopted in full;

2. Defendants Bacoch, Dickerson, Douglas, and Murray’s September 1, 2006

motion for summary judgment/summary adjudication is granted as follows:

a. Summary judgment is granted in favor of defendants Bacoch, Douglas,

and Murray on all claims;

b. Summary judgment is granted in favor of defendant Dickerson only as

to plaintiff’s medical care claim;

c. Defendants Bacoch, Douglas, and Murray are dismissed from this

action; and

3. This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s claim that defendant Powell violated

plaintiff’s constitutional rights by issuing a false disciplinary charge against him and on

plaintiff’s excessive use of force claim against defendants Johnson, Dickerson, and Zwolinski.

DATED: September 25, 2007.

Case 2:03-cv-02518-DAD Document 112 Filed 09/26/07 Page 2 of 2