Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES LATHROP, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-05678-JST (KAW)

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS 

UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 203

The parties to the above-captioned case have filed a motion to file documents under seal. 

They seek to file certain portions of a joint letter under seal along with certain excerpts from 

accompanying exhibits. The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because it is not 

"narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material." See Civil L.R. 79-5(b). The parties 

may re-file an administrative motion to seal that fully complies with Civil Local Rule 79-5.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 08/01/16

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 217 Filed 08/01/16 Page 1 of 1