Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00729/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00729-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 07CV0729

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLETTE SNEED,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 07CV0729-LAB (AJB)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

vs. SERVICE

CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, FIRST

FEDERAL BANK OF CALIFORNIA,

HOMEQ SERVICING, COUNTRYWIDE,

GMAC/SILVERSTATE,

Defendants.

On April 20, 2007, Plaintiff filed her complaint against all Defendants. On May 11,

summonses were issued as to all Defendants. No proofs of service were ever filed;

however, Defendants First Federal Bank of California, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., and

Chase Home Finance, LLC have appeared.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l), proof of service must be provided to the Court.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), service of the summons and complaint must be made no

later than 120 days after the filing of the complaint. This time period has already passed.

Therefore, Plaintiff is ordered to file proofs of service on the remaining Defendants (HomEq

Servicing and GMAC/Silverstate) no later than 14 calendar days from the date this order is

entered. If Plaintiff wishes to show good cause for failure to serve within the time limit, she

is directed to do so in a memorandum of points and authorities, no longer than three pages

Case 3:07-cv-00729-LAB-AJB Document 22 Filed 08/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 07CV0729

in length, not counting any appended or lodged material. This memorandum of points and

authorities must be filed within the time permitted for filing proofs of service. Should Plaintiff

fail to file proofs of service or show good cause for failure to serve, the remaining Plaintiffs

will be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

Plaintiff is reminded that she is still required to obey the Court’s previous orders and

admonitions regarding what she must, or must not include in documents filed with the Court.

See Order Striking Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and Order Granting Defendant

First Federal Bank of California’s Motion to Dismiss, both entered June 27, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 21, 2007

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-00729-LAB-AJB Document 22 Filed 08/22/07 Page 2 of 2