Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01348/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01348-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SINETH MOR, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

JOHN ASHCROFT, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:05-CV-1348 OWW SMS HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #6]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On January 26, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. 

Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections. The Court notes that the

Findings and Recommendation were returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable on

February 8, 2006.

Case 1:05-cv-01348-OWW -SMS Document 9 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued January 26, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 28, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01348-OWW -SMS Document 9 Filed 03/28/06 Page 2 of 2