Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01470/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01470-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may apply to any habeas corpus proceeding “to 1

the extent that they are not inconsistent with any statutory provisions” or the Rules Governing

Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Rule 11, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID DUANE PARKER,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-02-1470 GEB JFM P

vs.

D. RUNNELS, et al., 

Respondents. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of

habeas corpus. Judgment was entered on October 25, 2005, denying petitioner habeas relief. On

November 14, 2005, petitioner filed a document entitled “Application for Reconsideration,”

which he signed on November 9, 2005. Because petitioner filed his request more than ten court

days after judgment was entered, this court construes petitioner’s application as a motion

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) to set aside the judgment. This action was denied on the 1

merits. Petitioner seeks to have the judgment vacated. 

Case 2:02-cv-01470-GEB -JFM Document 26 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in relevant part:

On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a

party or a party's legal representative from a final judgment, order,

or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence,

surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence

which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to

move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether

heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation,

or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void;

(5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a

prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or

otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment

should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason

justifying relief from the operation of the judgment. The motion

shall be made within a reasonable time, and for reasons (1), (2),

and (3) not more than one year after the judgment, order, or

proceeding was entered or taken.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); see also Rule 11, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. Relief under exception 6 above

requires a finding of "extraordinary circumstances." Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v.

Dunnahoo, 637 F.2d 1338, 1341 (9th Cir.1981). 

Petitioner contends that his “mere association with co-defendant Jameel Coles

cannot subject [petitioner] to criminal liability or transform him into a perpetrator,”and that

petitioner’s “mere presence at the scene, which does not itself assist the commission of the crime,

does not amount to aiding and abetting.” (Petr.’s App. at 3.) However, as noted in the August

22, 2005 findings and recommendations, there was evidence petitioner’s role in this crime

exceeded aiding and abetting: each witness “testified it was petitioner who first knocked the

victim unconscious, planned to take the victim’s van, drove the victim’s van to a remote area

where he was murdered, and took part in disposing of the victim’s property. (RT 403, 576, 772,

992, 1003.)” (August 22, 2005 Findings and Recommendations at 19-20.)

Respondent correctly points out that the cases petitioner cites in support of his

request are not new. In addition, those cases are not on point herein because petitioner was not

found guilty based on a theory of mere presence at the scene of the crime or by his association

with Jameel Coles. 

Case 2:02-cv-01470-GEB -JFM Document 26 Filed 12/21/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 In his declaration, petitioner argues that the court took into consideration unsupported 2

facts that were not part of the record. He contends that the statement “Petitioner’s fingerprints

were found in the van,” (August 22, 2005 Findings and Recommendations at 21) is an incorrect

statement. A review of the record demonstrates that this statement is incorrect. The statement

should read, “Petitioner fingerprints were found in Cole’s car.” However, petitioner’s guilt

hinged on the testimony of his co-perpetrators of the crime. The location of petitioner’s

fingerprints was not critical to this court’s analysis herein.

3

A review of plaintiff's case indicates that it does not meet any of these

exceptions. Thus, petitioner has not met the substantive showing required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 2

60(b)(1) to warrant relief from the final judgment entered in this action. 

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that petitioner’s

November 14, 2005, application for reconsideration, construed as a motion to vacate judgment,

be denied. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised 

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 21, 2005.

1; park1470.60b

Case 2:02-cv-01470-GEB -JFM Document 26 Filed 12/21/05 Page 3 of 3