Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00022/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00022-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

156749 v1 

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND ORDER THEREON 

JEFFREY A. ROSENFELD – SBN 136896 

WILLIAM P. DONOVAN, JR. – SBN 155881 

DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP 

1999 Avenue of the Stars 

Fourth Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90067-6022 

Telephone: (310) 595-3001 

Facsimile: (310) 595-3301 

william.donovan@dlapiper.com

MICHAEL JOBLOVE (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) 

GENOVESE, JOBLOVE & BATTISTA P.A. 

Bank of America Tower, 44th Floor 

100 S.E. Second Street 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 349-2300 

Facsimile: (305) 349-2310 

mjoblove@gjb-law.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

BURGER KING CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DIVISION - FRESNO 

GREGORY C. SCHNEIDER, an 

individual, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BURGER KING CORPORATION 

Defendant. 

Case No. 06-00022 REC- DLB 

[Assigned to Hon. Robert E. Coyle, Dept. 1]

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF 

DEFENDANT BURGER KING 

CORPORATION’S MOTION TO STAY OR, 

ALTERNATIVELY, TO DISMISS THIS 

ACTION AND ORDER THEREON 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-00022-OWW -DLB Document 13 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

156749 v1 

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND ORDER THEREON 

Defendant Burger King Corporation (“BKC”) and Gregory C. Schneider (“Schneider”) 

have entered into a conditional limited license, which may ultimately lead to a resolution of this 

case. BKC and Schneider, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree 

that in the interests of judicial economy, the hearing on BKC’s Motion to Stay or, Alternatively, 

to Dismiss currently scheduled for February 27, 2006 be continued ninety (90) days to May 30, 

2006, at 1:30 p.m. in the captioned Court. The briefing schedule for Schneider’s opposition brief 

and BKC’s reply brief shall be correspondingly continued. No amended notice of motion need 

be filed or served by BKC. 

 

Dated: February 15, 2006 DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP 

By: /s/ 

William P. Donovan, Jr. 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 BURGER KING CORPORATION 

 

Dated: February 15, 2006 KIMBLE, MacMICHAEL & UPTON 

By: /s/ 

Steven D. McGee 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 GREGORY C. SCHNEIDER 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: February _27_, 2006 _/s/ ROBERT E. COYLE 

 Honorable Robert E. Coyle 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-00022-OWW -DLB Document 13 Filed 02/28/06 Page 2 of 2