Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00202/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00202-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. 1

Case No. C 10-202 JF (PVT)

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO MODIFY OR STAY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ETC.

(JFLC2)

**E-Filed 4/15/2010**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

TMX FUNDING, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

IMPERO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

 Defendants.

Case Number C 10-202 JF (PVT)

ORDER (1) DENYING WITHOUT 1

PREJUDICE EX PARTE

APPLICATION TO MODIFY OR

STAY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION;

(2) SETTING HEARING ON

MOTIONS TO MODIFY OR STAY

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; 

(3) GRANTING IN PART EX PARTE

APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME

FOR HEARING MOTION FOR CIVIL

CONTEMPT; (4) SETTING HEARING

ON MOTION FOR CIVIL

CONTEMPT; AND (5) SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

[re: document nos. 63, 64, 80, 85]

Defendants’ ex parte application to modify or stay the preliminary injunction is DENIED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. That application [doc. 80] and the noticed motion to modify or stay

the preliminary injunction [doc. 81] are SET FOR HEARING on May 7, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. The

hearing set for June 11, 2010 is VACATED.

Case 5:10-cv-00202-JF Document 93 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 10-202 JF (PVT)

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO MODIFY OR STAY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ETC.

(JFLC2)

Plaintiff’s ex parte application to shorten time for hearing on its motion for civil

contempt is GRANTED. That motion [doc. 63] is SET FOR HEARING on May 7, 2010 at 9:00

a.m.

Any further opposition to the motions to modify or stay the preliminary injunction or to

the motion for civil contempt shall be filed on or before April 23, 2010. Any replies shall be

filed on or before April 30, 2010. Defendants’ briefing shall (1) propose language for the

requested modified injunction and (2) explain why they have not complied with the Court’s order

to return the laptop computers and why they believe this issue has not been litigated fully.

The motion to dismiss remains set for hearing on May 28, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 4/15/2010

__________________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00202-JF Document 93 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 2