Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-349/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL No. 1917 

Case No. C-07-5944-SC 

ORDER REGARDING 

SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSIONS IN 

SUPPORT OF MOTIONS AND IN 

PREPARATION FOR THE CASE 

STATUS CONFERENCE 

This Order Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS 

 On August 7, 2015, the parties will meet for a case status 

conference. Numerous parties have settled some or all of their 

claims, mooting certain motions, delaying others, and causing still 

others to become ripe for ruling. The Court issues this order to 

simplify and streamline the parties' submissions, the Court's 

consideration of those submissions, and maximize the efficiency of 

the Court and all parties during the status conference. 

 First, the Court ORDERS parties to identify and jointly file a 

single list of any tag-along cases presently pending transfer to 

the Court by the JPMDL or any other known cases related to this MDL 

known by counsel but not at present subject to a motion to transfer 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3887 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 7
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. For each such case, include the case 

name, an ECF or docket number, the jurisdiction in which it is 

presently pending, and (if applicable) the reason the case is not 

subject to a motion to transfer. 

 Second, the Court ORDERS Class Counsel for Direct Purchaser 

Plaintiffs (DPPs), Class Counsel for Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs 

(IPPs), and DAP Liaison Counsel to jointly file a single list of 

which cases associated with this MDL can be terminated and in which 

pending motions can be terminated. This list will help the Court 

determine which motions remain active in light of the numerous 

recent settlements and other dismissals. A list of cases 

associated with this MDL as generated by ECF is attached to assist 

in the completion of this list. 

Third, the Court ORDERS DAPs' Liaison Counsel to identify all 

DAP cases that will be subject to remand upon completion of 

pretrial matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 and the Supreme 

Court's decision in Lexecon, Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & 

Lerach, 523 U.S. 26 (1998). Also note if the parties presently 

anticipate settling the matter or proceeding to trial. 

Fourth, the Court ORDERS all DAP Defendants to jointly file a 

single list of all DAP cases that will remain for trial within this 

Judicial District after all pre-trial matters have been resolved. 

Cross list by Defendant, the case name, ECF number, and each 

plaintiff that is asserting a claim against the Defendant. 

Fifth, the Court ORDERS that if a case will remain in this 

district, the parties to such actions shall confer and file a 

joint, single submission proposing how the parties propose to try 

the case. This submission should include a schedule as complete as 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3887 Filed 06/23/15 Page 2 of 7
3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

possible to maximize the efficiency of all relevant parties at the 

upcoming case status conference. Notwithstanding any other 

deadlines set herein, this list shall be due to the Court not later 

than 10 days prior to the scheduling conference. 

Sixth, the Court ORDERS the parties to file a single, joint 

spreadsheet or other document showing, in tabular format, any 

pending motion that the parties believe to be claim or party 

dispositive. This will assist the Court in prioritizing its review 

of pending motions. The list should not include motions in limine 

and other motions related to conduct of any trial. As an example 

of the information the Court requests from the parties, a 

suggestion follows. In complying with this directive, the parties 

need not follow the suggested format precisely, but should provide 

the essential information set forth below. 

ECF 

No. 

Movant Motion Adverse Parties Opp'n 

ECF 

No. 

Reply 

ECF 

No. 

2976 Hitachi 

Parties 

(joinder 

by 

Toshiba, 

ECF No. 

3010) 

Motion for 

Summary 

Judgment Based 

on Lack of 

Evidence of 

Participation 

in Alleged 

Conspiracy 

IPPs, 

Electrograph, 

Circuit City, 

Best Buy, Target, 

Sears, Interbond, 

Office Depot, 

CompuCom, Costco, 

P.C. Richard & 

Son, Schultze, 

and Tech Data 

3274 X 

If for any reason (e.g., settlement) a dispositive motion yet to be 

decided is in whole or part no longer active against some of the 

initially adverse parties but remains active against others or 

requires review for only certain issues, the parties shall include 

/// 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3887 Filed 06/23/15 Page 3 of 7
4 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

the motion and indicate no further review by the Court is required 

by using strikethrough, footnote, or some other means. 

 As these six lists or submissions will require coordination 

among different parties and may be more or less readily available, 

they may be filed together in a single document or as up to six 

separate documents filed at different times in the manner described 

below. However, all responsive documents must reference they are 

in satisfaction of this order and must be filed not later than 20 

calendar days prior to the status conference, unless otherwise 

specified herein. 

The document(s) should be submitted via ECF, in electronic 

format to the Court's proposed order email inbox, 

SCpo@cand.uscourts.gov, and via a printed courtesy copy to 

Chambers. The requirements set forth in the Court's January 15, 

2015 Order, ECF No. 3398, regarding updates to the local rules with 

respect to this case remain in effect as applied to all other case 

filings. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Dated: June 23, 2015 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3887 Filed 06/23/15 Page 4 of 7
Attachment 

 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3887 Filed 06/23/15 Page 5 of 7
MDL No. 1917 In Re: Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation 

Member cases: 

 3:08-cv-00178-SC

 3:08-cv-00309-SC

 3:07-cv-06433-SC

 3:07-cv-05981-SC

 3:07-cv-06279-SC

 3:07-cv-06303-SC

 3:07-cv-06331-SC

 3:07-cv-06225-SC

 3:07-cv-06416-SC

 3:08-cv-00494-SC

 3:08-cv-01056-SC

 3:08-cv-01032-SC

 3:08-cv-00337-SC

 3:08-cv-01345-SC

 3:08-cv-01108-SC

 3:08-cv-01364-SC

 3:08-cv-01371-SC

 3:08-cv-01319-SC

 3:08-cv-01621-SC

 3:08-cv-01622-SC

 3:08-cv-01623-SC

 3:08-cv-01624-SC

 3:08-cv-01626-SC

 3:08-cv-01627-SC

 3:08-cv-01721-SC

 3:08-cv-00614-SC

 3:08-cv-01807-SC

 3:08-cv-01559-SC

 3:08-cv-01983-SC

 3:08-cv-01984-SC

 3:08-cv-01985-SC

 3:08-cv-02024-SC

 3:08-cv-02023-SC

 3:08-cv-02204-SC

 3:08-cv-02205-SC

 3:08-cv-02206-SC

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3887 Filed 06/23/15 Page 6 of 7
 3:08-cv-02980-SC

 3:08-cv-03493-SC

 3:08-cv-04063-SC

 3:08-cv-05521-SC

 3:11-cv-01656-SC

 3:11-cv-05513-SC

 3:11-cv-06275-SC

 3:11-cv-06276-SC

 3:11-cv-06397-SC

 3:11-cv-06396-SC

 3:11-cv-05502-SC

 3:11-cv-06205-SC

 3:11-cv-05381-SC

 3:11-cv-05515-SC

 3:11-cv-05514-SC

 3:12-cv-01998-SC

 3:12-cv-02648-SC

 3:12-cv-02649-SC

 3:13-cv-00157-SC

 3:13-cv-02171-SC

 3:13-cv-05724-SC

 3:13-cv-05723-SC

 3:13-cv-01173-SC

 3:13-cv-02776-SC

 3:13-cv-03234-SC

 3:13-cv-05668-SC

 3:13-cv-05727-SC

 3:13-cv-05726-SC

 3:13-cv-05725-SC

 3:13-cv-05261-SC

 3:13-cv-05262-SC

 3:13-cv-05264-SC

 3:13-cv-05686-SC

 3:14-cv-02058-SC

 3:14-cv-02510-SC

Related Case: 3:12-mc-80151-SC Cases in other courts:13-80210 

14-16817 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3887 Filed 06/23/15 Page 7 of 7