Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00344/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00344-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

At the scheduling conference, the Court and counsel addressed two emerging discovery 

issues. As a result, the Court ORDERS:

1. No later than 5:00 p.m. on May 12, 2016, counsel for Defendants SHALL notify 

counsel for the receiver where the Bentley automobile is located and when the receiver and his 

counsel may view it. This date for the inspection of the car SHALL not be later than May 18, 

2016 unless the receiver requests a later date;

2. No later than noon on May 12, 2016, Plaintiff’s counsel SHALL send via e-mail to 

counsel for Defendants and the receiver, a brief explanation of why the images of Mr. Nase and 

Mrs. Nase’s computers should be made immediately and why the images should be held by the 

receiver. The statement SHALL cite the legal authorities Plaintiff believes supports this position.

No later than 4 p.m. on May 13, 2016, Defendants’ counsel SHALL send via e-mail to 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

 Plaintiff,

v.

BIC REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-CV-00344 LJO JLT

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY ISSUES

Case 1:16-cv-00344-DAD-JLT Document 63 Filed 05/11/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

counsel for the Plaintiff and the receiver, a brief explanation of the positions of Mr. Nase and Mrs. 

Nase related to allowing an image of their computers to be taken and held by the receiver. The 

statement SHALL cite the legal authorities upon which the Nase’s believe supports their position.

If, after review of the Nases position, it is apparent the matter has not resolved, Plaintiff’s 

counsel SHALL send an e-mail, with a copy of the documents exchanged by counsel, to 

JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov with a “cc” to all counsel. This email must be received by the 

Court no later than 8:00 a.m. on May 16, 2016. Unless there is full agreement as to the taking of 

the computer images and the images being held by the receiver, the Court will conduct an informal 

telephonic conference on May 16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff’s counsel SHALL provide dial-in 

instructions for the conference call via e-mail to all counsel and the Court no later than 8:00 a.m. 

on May 16, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 11, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00344-DAD-JLT Document 63 Filed 05/11/16 Page 2 of 2