Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02595/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02595-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHEILA GOODEN, an individual,

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD

v.

SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., a ORDER

Virginia Corporation; and 

SUNTRUST BANK, INC., a Georgia

Corporation,

Defendants.

 /

On June 8, 2012, the parties appeared before the assigned magistrate judge for

hearing of defendant’s motion for a protective order. On June 11, 2012 the assigned magistrate 1

judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to

be filed within seven days after being served with the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

 The parties agreed at the hearing to the filing of objections simultaneously and to waive 1

any right to reply to objections filed in order to expedite the assigned District Judge’s review of

the June 11, 2012 findings and recommendations.

1

Case 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD Document 35 Filed 06/20/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations to be supported by the

record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 11, 2012 (Doc. No. 32) are

adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s May 30, 2012 motion for a protective order (Doc. No. 25) is

granted;

3. Discovery and the filing of any motion is stayed pending the ruling by the

Bankruptcy Court on the motion to approve settlement set for hearing in that court on July 3,

2012;

4. The parties are directed to file a notice of decision immediately upon a

decision being rendered by the Bankruptcy Court; and

5. The parties are directed to file an Amended Joint Rule 26(f) Conference Report,

taking into account the length of time discovery is stayed, within 14 days of the filing of the

notice of the Bankruptcy Court’s decision with this court.

DATED: June 19, 2012

/s/ John A. Mendez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

2

Case 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD Document 35 Filed 06/20/12 Page 2 of 2