Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00398/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00398-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT A. WOODS and LORI A.

WOODS, husband and wife as

individuals, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

PROTECTION ONE ALARM 

MONITORING, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation admitted to do 

business in California, Does 1

to 100, and ASSET RESOURCES,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-CV-00398-SMS

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

AS MOOT (Doc. 43)

Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of Plaintiffs’ motion

for order to file second amended complaint, filed April 3, 2007,

is DENIED as MOOT (Doc. 43). Plaintiffs’ motion came on

regularly for hearing on March 30, 2007. The Court did not rule

from the bench but rather took the matter under advisement after

oral argument. On April 13, 2007, the Court ruled on Plaintiffs’

motion to amend (Doc. 47). Therefore, as of the date of filing

of the request for reconsideration, April 3, 2007, there was no

court order to reconsider. A close reading, difficult though it

Case 1:06-cv-00398-SMS Document 48 Filed 04/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

was as portions of the pleading are nonsensical, appears to be

further argument focused on comments the Court made during the

oral argument. For this reason, too, the pleading is improper. 

Similarly, Defendant Protection One’s opposition to

Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of Plaintiffs’ motion for

order to file second amended complaint (Doc. 44), and Protection

One’s objection to evidence and request to strike re: Plaintiffs’

motion for reconsideration of Plaintiffs’ motion for order to

file second amended complaint (Doc. 45), are also deemed MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 16, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00398-SMS Document 48 Filed 04/17/07 Page 2 of 2