Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00497/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00497-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY RANGEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-00497-EMC 

ORDER

Docket No. 10

The Court dismissed this action without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition for 

writ of habeas corpus if he ever received permission from the Ninth Circuit to file a second or 

successive petition. Petitioner then sent a letter asking for a copy of his petition and an extension 

of time to submit the order from the Ninth Circuit. Docket No. 10. 

There is no formal deadline for submitting an order permitting a second or successive 

petition, so there is no deadline for this Court to extend. Petitioner should be diligent and file a 

new petition for writ of habeas corpus (which will be filed as a new action, rather than as an 

amended petition in this action) only after he obtains permission to do so from the Ninth Circuit. 

Petitioner should not file any more documents/requests in this action because it is closed. The 

Clerk will send to Petitioner a copy of Docket No. 1. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 25, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-00497-EMC Document 11 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 1