Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00758/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00758-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT I. WADE, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER & 

CURRENCY, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-0758 KJM AC PS 

ORDER 

 

 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On 

May 3, 2013, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 12(b)(6). No opposition to the motion to dismiss has been filed. 

 Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be 

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party 

will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the 

motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 230(j) provides that 

failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in 

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be 

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 

Case 2:13-cv-00758-KJM-AC Document 11 Filed 06/03/13 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

inherent power of the Court.” 

 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The hearing date of June 12, 2013 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s motion 

to dismiss is continued to July 17, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26. 

 2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than July 

3, 2013. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of 

non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

DATED: May 31, 2013 

 

/mb;wade0758.nooppo 

Case 2:13-cv-00758-KJM-AC Document 11 Filed 06/03/13 Page 2 of 2