Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03449/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03449-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

MINNEAPOLIS

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

81629374.1 STIPULATION REGARDING

BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS 

C09-03449 JSW-MEJ 

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

Morgan Chu (70446) 

mchu@irell.com 

Jonathan S. Kagan (166039) 

jkagan@irell.com 

1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276 

Telephone: 310-277-1010 

Facsimile: 310-203-7199 

David C. McPhie (231520) 

dmcphie@irell.com 

Rebecca L. Clifford (254105) 

reclifford@irell.com 

Laura E. Evans (254547) 

levans@irell.com 

840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400 

Newport Beach, CA 92660-6324 

Telephone: 949-760-0991 

Facsimile: 949-760-5200 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Juniper Networks, Inc. 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 

Sara A. Poulos (admitted pro hac vice) 

sapoulos@rkmc.com 

Julia Dayton Klein (admitted pro hac vice) 

jdklein@rkmc.com 

2800 LaSalle Plaza 

800 LaSalle Avenue 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 

Telephone: 612-349-8500 

Facsimile: 612-339-4181 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Altitude Capital Partners, L.P. and Security 

Research Holdings LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Juniper Networks, Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Altitude Capital Partners, L.P., and 

Security Research Holdings LLC, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO.: C09-03449 JSW-MEJ 

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING 

PAGE LIMITS 

 

Case3:09-cv-03449-JSW Document129 Filed08/05/10 Page1 of 4

AND ORDER THEREON

Case 3:09-cv-03449-JSW Document 130 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 4
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

MINNEAPOLIS

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

81629374.1 1 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS 

C09-03449 JSW-MEJ 

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Juniper”) and 

Defendants Altitude Capital Partners, L.P. and Security Research Holdings LLC (collectively, 

“Defendants”) hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, to allow the parties twentytwo pages for the opening and opposition briefs for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or in the 

Alternative to Transfer (“Motion to Dismiss”). 

WHEREAS, on October 16, 2009, Defendants Altitude Capital Partners, L.P. and Security 

Research Holdings LLC filed a Motion to Dismiss before Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James. 

See Docket Nos. 15-18; 

WHEREAS, on October 27, 2009, the Clerk of Court for the Northern District of 

California issued a notice that the above-captioned case was being reassigned to the Honorable 

Jeffrey S. White. The Clerk of Court also vacated all hearing dates. See Docket No. 25; 

WHEREAS, Judge White has issued as one if his Civil Standing Orders the following: 

6. Motions. All briefs, whether in support of, in opposition to, or in 

reply to any motion, with the exception of summary judgment 

motions and claims construction briefs, may not exceed fifteen 

pages, exclusive of title pages, indices of cases, table of contents, 

exhibits, and summaries of argument, if required. All declarations 

shall be filed as separate documents. Briefs exceeding ten pages in 

length must contain an additional one-page summary of argument, 

including reference to any important cases cited; 

WHEREAS, on November 16, 2009, after the above-captioned case was re-assigned to the 

Honorable Jeffrey S. White, the parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Briefing 

Page Limits and Order Thereon, requesting to extend the briefing page limits from fifteen to 

twenty-one. See Docket No. 33; 

WHEREAS, on November 30, 2009, Judge White granted the parties’ joint request to 

extend the briefing page limits from fifteen to twenty-one. See Docket No. 34; 

WHEREAS, on November 30, 2009, the Defendants re-filed their Motion to Dismiss. The 

memorandum in support of the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss was twenty-one pages long. See 

Docket Nos. 36-37; 

Case 3:09-cv-03449-JSW Document 130 Filed 08/05/10 Page 2 of 4 Case3:09-cv-03449-JSW Document129 Filed08/05/10 Page2 of 4
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

MINNEAPOLIS

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

81629374.1 2 

STIPULATION REGARDING

BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS 

C09-03449 JSW-MEJ 

WHEREAS, on June 29, 2010, the Defendants filed an Administrative Request to File 

Statement of Recent Decision and notified Judge White that the Defendants are withdrawing a 

portion of the pending motion to dismiss. See Docket No. 124; 

WHEREAS, on June 30, 2010, Judge White issued an Order Granting Defendants’ 

Administrative Request to File Statement of Recent Decision and terminated the Defendants’ 

pending motion to dismiss without prejudice as to re-filing. See Docket No. 125; 

 WHEREAS, the memorandum in support of the soon to be re-filed Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss or to Transfer exceeds fifteen pages. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Juniper and the 

Defendants that the page limit for the opening brief and the opposition brief to the Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss be extended to twenty-two pages. 

DATED: August 5, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

By: /s/ David C. McPhie

Attorney for Plaintiff Juniper Networks, Inc. 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 

By: /s/ Julia Dayton Klein

 Julia Dayton Klein 

Attorney for Defendants 

Altitude Capital Partners, L.P. and Security Research 

Holdings LLC 

Case 3:09-cv-03449-JSW Document 130 Filed 08/05/10 Page 3 of 4 Case3:09-cv-03449-JSW Document129 Filed08/05/10 Page3 of 4
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

MINNEAPOLIS

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

81629374.1 1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION 

REGARDING BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS 

C09-03449 JSW-MEJ 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Defendants shall have 

twenty-two pages for its opening brief on its Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Transfer 

or Stay and the Plaintiff shall have twenty-two pages for its opposition to the Defendant’s Motion 

to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Transfer. 

Dated: , 2010 

 HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case3:09-cv-03449-JSW Document129 Filed08/05/10 Page4 of 4

August 5

Case 3:09-cv-03449-JSW Document 130 Filed 08/05/10 Page 4 of 4