Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02192/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02192-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROL ROYE,

Plaintiff, CIV S-04-2192 DFL KJM PS

v.

FAIR ISAAC AND COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Presently calendared for hearing on August 3, 2005 is defendant LandSafe’s motion to dismiss. 

No substantive opposition has been filed but plaintiff has requested that the hearing be continued

because she will be out of the country until September 3, 2005. Plaintiff is advised that the

proper procedure when requesting an extension of time is to first seek a stipulation from the

opposing side. See Local Rule 6-142. 

Plaintiff is further advised that Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to

the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The

Rule further provides that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral

arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In

addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of

Case 2:04-cv-02192-DFL -KJM Document 20 Filed 07/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that

failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions

authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of August 3, 2005 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s motion

to dismiss is continued to September 28, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than

September 14, 2005. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a

statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed

against defendant LandSafe pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: July 27, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

roye.nop

Case 2:04-cv-02192-DFL -KJM Document 20 Filed 07/28/05 Page 2 of 2