Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-00005/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-00005-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −176)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for

the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 2,176 additional

action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court,

all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to

Judge Chhabria.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the

Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall

be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

John W. Nichols

Clerk of the Panel

Dec 30, 2019

I hereby certify that the annexed 

instrument is a true and correct copy 

of the original on file in my office.

 ATTEST:

 SUSAN Y. SOONG

 Clerk, U.S. District Court

 Northern District of California

 

 by: 

 Deputy Clerk

 Date: 

 

December 30, 2019

Case 3:20-cv-00005-VC Document 4 Filed 12/30/19 Page 1 of 3
IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−176 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 2 19−02299 Tullius v. Monsanto Company

CONNECTICUT

CT 3 19−01926 Petajasoja v. Monsanto Co

DELAWARE

DE 1 19−02274 Humphrey et al v. Monsanto Company

FLORIDA MIDDLE

FLM 3 19−01255 Coleman v. Monsanto Company

FLM 8 19−02693 Guevara v. Monsanto Company

FLM 8 19−02905 Siniff v. Monsanto Company

ILLINOIS NORTHERN

ILN 1 19−08020 Malandruccolo v. Monsanto Company

ILN 1 19−08021 Hays v. Monsanto Company

ILN 1 19−08022 McInnis v. Monsanto Company

ILN 1 19−08024 Kelley v. Monsanto Company

ILN 1 19−08157 Nault v. Monsanto Company

MISSOURI EASTERN

MOE 4 19−03073 Lewis et al v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19−03074 Opel v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19−03081 Wojno v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19−03103 Aiken, Jr. v. Monsanto Company et al

MOE 4 19−03107 Glaze et al v. Monsanto Company et al

MOE 4 19−03217 Taylor v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19−03218 Roach v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19−03219 Davis v. Monsanto Company

Case 3:20-cv-00005-VC Document 4 Filed 12/30/19 Page 2 of 3
MOE 4 19−03221 Benson v. Monsanto Company

MOE 4 19−03260 McCool v. Monsanto Company

OHIO NORTHERN

OHN 3 19−02661 Wistinghausen et al v. Monsanto Company

SOUTH CAROLINA

SC 4 19−03509 Ward v. Monsanto Company

TENNESSEE EASTERN

TNE 3 19−00374 Arms v. Monsanto Company (TV1)

Case 3:20-cv-00005-VC Document 4 Filed 12/30/19 Page 3 of 3