Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01924/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01924-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICIA H. MINTZ , CASE NO. 15-CV-1924-HSG

Plaintiff, 

 

v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH 

PLAN, INC., et al. ,

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process:

x Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties have agreed to 

private mediation, to be provided by Kathy Yanni at JAMS or another mutually 

agreed upon provider.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

x other requested deadline __October 9, 2015____

Dated: July 21, 2015 /s/ Lisa S. Serebin_____________

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: July 21, 2015 /s/ Michelle M. Scannell________

Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case 4:15-cv-01924-HSG Document 21 Filed 07/22/15 Page 1 of 2
ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this

document has been obtained by each of the other signatories.

Dated: July 21, 2015 /s/ Lisa S. Serebin_____________

Attorney for Plaintiff

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

 The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________________________

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Rev. 12/11

Page 2 of 2

X

7/22/2015

Case 4:15-cv-01924-HSG Document 21 Filed 07/22/15 Page 2 of 2