Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02226/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02226-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLYDE THORNTON,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-05-2226 FCD GGH PS

vs.

B.P.T., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

__________________________________/

On March 9, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:05-cv-02226-FCD-GGH Document 38 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 9, 2007, are ADOPTED; 

2. The motions to dismiss filed by defendant Solano County on October 12,

2006, and by defendant Sacramento County on November 15, 2006, are granted;

3. Defendant Chriss Duenas and this action in its entirety is dismissed for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction.

DATED: April 26, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-02226-FCD-GGH Document 38 Filed 04/27/07 Page 2 of 2