Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02948/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02948-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. CV 05-2948 MMC [PROP.] SEALING ORDER 

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) griley@omm.com 

DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003) dsnyder@omm.com 

MICHELLE L. DAVIDSON (S.B. #218559) mdavidson@omm.com 

CARLA MENINSKY (S.B. #233470) cmeninsky@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendants 

OrthoClear, Inc. and 

OrthoClear Holdings, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

ORTHOCLEAR, INC. and 

ORTHOCLEAR HOLDINGS, INC., 

Defendant.

Case No. CV 05-2948 MMC 

SEALING ORDER GRANTING IN PART 

AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE CONFIDENTIAL 

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PURSUANT 

TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 79-5 

[ORTHOCLEAR INC. REPLY 

MEMORANDUM]

Hearing Date: August 18, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 7 

Judge: Hon. Maxine Chesney 

Case 3:05-cv-02948-MMC Document 314 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. CV 05-2948 MMC 1 [PROP.] SEALING ORDER 

It is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Administrative Motion for Leave to File 

Confidential Documents Under Seal Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 [OrthoClear Inc. Reply 

Memorandum] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: 

1. The Clerk shall file under seal Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Sandeep N. Solanki 

in Support of Defendant OrthoClear Inc.’s Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion For 

Summary Judgment, dated August 4, 2006 (the “Solanki Reply Mem. Decl.”) (excerpts of the 

Miller transcript). 

2. The Clerk shall file under seal Exhibit 3 to the Solanki Reply Mem. Decl. 

(excerpts of the Ruutel transcript). 

3. The Clerk shall file under seal Exhibit 4 to the Solanki Reply Mem. Decl. 

(excerpts of the Chishti transcript). 

4. The Clerk shall file under seal Exhibit 5 to the Solanki Reply Mem. Decl. 

(excerpts of the Wolf transcript). 

5. The Clerk shall file under seal Exhibit 6 to the Solanki Reply Mem. Decl. 

(excerpts of the Breeland transcript). 

6. The Clerk shall file under seal Exhibit 9 to the Solanki Reply Mem. Decl. 

(document marked as Exhibit #103 to Chishti deposition). 

7. The Clerk shall file under seal the Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant 

OrthoClear, Inc.’s Motion For Summary Judgment, dated July 14, 2006. 

8. With respect to Exhibit 1 to the Solanki Reply Mem. Decl. (excerpts of the 

Alvarez transcript), defendants’ motion is denied for the reason plaintiff has withdrawn its 

designation of the matter as confidential. See Kissman Decl., filed July 20, 2006 (Docket # 208). 

Accordingly, the Clerk shall file Exhibit 1 to the Solanki Reply Mem. Decl. in the public record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 16, 2006 ______________________________ 

Hon. Maxine Chesney 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-02948-MMC Document 314 Filed 08/16/06 Page 2 of 2