Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00710/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00710-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MSHIFT, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DIGITAL INSIGHT CORPORATION, a

Delaware corporation, COMMUNITY TRUST

FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Louisiana

corporation, and COMMUNITY TRUST

BANK, a Louisiana corporation,

Defendants. /

DIGITAL INSIGHT CORPORATION, a

Delaware corporation,

Counterclaimant,

 v.

MSHIFT, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Counterdefendant. /

No. C 10-00710 WHA

QUESTIONS FOR COUNSEL

REGARDING PENDING MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Counsel for all interested parties shall file BY NOON ON JUNE 14, 2010, in five doublespaced pages or less, responses to the following questions:

1. Whether plaintiff should be required to specify in detail the factual basis for the

assertion that the proposed defendants infringe the patent-in-suit, specifying each claim asserted,

Case 3:10-cv-00710-WHA Document 78 Filed 06/07/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

explaining why each limitation thereof is met in the accused product(s), and specifically

identifying each accused product before the undersigned rules on the pending motion.

2. Whether, if enlargement of the action is permitted, invalidity issues should be

decided first with all other infringement issues held in abeyance, the reason being that there would

be no cause to impose the burden of litigation upon so many new parties if the patent is found to be

invalid.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 7, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00710-WHA Document 78 Filed 06/07/10 Page 2 of 2