Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05814/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05814-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE ROBINSON, )

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

)

No. CV-F-02-5418 OWW

(No. CR-F-97-5129 OWW)

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S

MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT

(Doc. 4) 

Petitioner Lawrence Robinson moves to vacate the judgment

entered on October 23, 2007 denying his motion to vacate, set

aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

Petitioner, relying on Rule 60(b)(4) and (6), Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, contends that he is entitled to vacation of the

judgment because the Court failed to address the merits of his

motions for post-conviction discovery.

Petitioner's motion to vacate is without merit and is

DENIED. The Memorandum Decision and Order filed on October 23,

2007 expressly denied Petitioner's motions for post-conviction

Case 1:02-cv-05814-OWW Document 5 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

discovery because that discovery would not have supported

Petitioner's claim that Videotronics was not a business operating

in interstate commerce. Because the Court addressed the motions

for post-conviction discovery, there is no basis to vacate the

judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 7, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05814-OWW Document 5 Filed 01/10/08 Page 2 of 2