Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05978/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05978-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

HENRY MURRAY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CAL TERHUNE, et al., )

) 

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 02-5978 AWI DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM 285 FORMS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

section 1983. Pending before the Court is the amended complaint, filed April 3, 2003. The amended

complaint appears to state a cognizable claim for retaliation against defendants Terhune, Lewis,

Allen, Wallace, Corley and Comaites. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants Terhune, Lewis, Allen, Wallace,

Corley and Comaites. 

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff six (6) USM-285 forms, six (6) summons,

a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

amended complaint filed April 3, 2003.

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, plaintiff shall complete the

Case 1:02-cv-05978-LJO-DLB Document 10 Filed 04/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

Court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Seven (7) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed April 3, 2003. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this action

be dismissed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 6, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05978-LJO-DLB Document 10 Filed 04/06/06 Page 2 of 2