Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00732/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00732-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY PORRECA, et al.,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF 

CALIFORNIA, LLC,

Defendant.

No. 1:15-cv-00732-DAD-MJS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REQUIRING

PLAINTIFFS’ PERSONAL APPEARANCE

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 

SERVE THIS ORDER ON PLAINTIFF

It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs Arturo Gonzalez and Gonzalez and Son, Inc., are to 

appear personally at the continued hearing on their counsel’s motion to withdraw on Tuesday, 

July 5, 2016 at 1:30 P.M. in Courtroom 5 of the Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse, 2500 

Tulare St., Fresno, California and to show cause why that motion should not be granted. In the 

alternative plaintiffs Gonzalez and Gonzalez and Son, Inc. may appear telephonically, but must 

contact plaintiffs’ counsel, Matthew Mellen, to coordinate a telephonic appearance no later than 

Thursday, June 30, 2016, in order to do so. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to serve this order on plaintiffs Arturo Gonzalez and 

Gonzalez and Son, Inc. personally by mail at the below addresses which have been provided by 

their counsel:

/////

Case 1:15-cv-00732-DAD-SAB Document 61 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Arturo Gonzalez

Gonzalez and Son, Inc.

5827 Herma Street

San Jose, CA 95123

If plaintiffs Arturo Gonzalez and Gonzalez and Son, Inc. no longer wish to pursue this 

action but rather wish to be dismissed as plaintiffs, they may advise the court of that desire. If 

not, however, they must appear as ordered. Any failure on their part to comply with this order 

may result in the dismissal of this action as to them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00732-DAD-SAB Document 61 Filed 06/27/16 Page 2 of 2