Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01588/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01588-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING, FOR 

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND FOR SERVICE OF SAME

{01359442.DOC}

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Terence J. Cassidy, SBN 99180

Kristina M. Hall, SBN 196794

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

(916) 929-1481 (telephone)

(916) 927-3706 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Defendants 

Gary W. Gorski (SBN 166526) 

LAW OFFICES OF GARY W. GORSKI 

1207 Front Street, Suite 15 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

(916) 965-6800 

Daniel M. Karalash (SBN 176422) 

Strategic Law Command 

1207 Front Street, Suite 15 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

B.O.L.T. an unincorporated association of 

motorcycle riders and enthusiasts; MARK 

TEMPLE; JOHN DALKE; LAWRENCE 

“WOLF” HAVEN; NOREEN McNULTY; 

WARREN PEARL; LYLE 

DUVAUCHELLE; JEFFREY RABE; 

DAVID ZALITSKIY; WILLIAM 

LANGHORNE; THOMAS BELL; ROBERT 

BALTHORPE II; 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, a political 

subdivision of the State of California; 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; a political 

subdivision of the State of California; 

RANCHO CORDOVA POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, an independent legal agency 

of the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and the 

Case No. 2:14-cv-01588-GEB-DAD

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] TO 

EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING, FOR 

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND FOR 

SERVICE OF SAME

Complaint filed July 4, 2014

Case 2:14-cv-01588-JAM-DB Document 30 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 4
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING, FOR 

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND FOR SERVICE OF SAME

{01359442.DOC}

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA; 

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT; MICHAEL GOOLD, in his 

official capacity as the Chief of Police of the 

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA; RANCHO 

CORDOVA POLICE TRAFFIC SERGEANT 

G. LANE, in his individual and official 

capacity as Supervisor of the Traffic Division; 

SCOTT R. JONES, in his official capacity as 

the SHERIFF of the COUNTY OF 

SACRAMENTO; RANCHO CORDOVA 

POLICE OFFICER S. CARROZZO (badge 

number 480); RANCHO CORDOVA 

POLICE OFFICER M. JAMES (badge 

number 507; RANCHO CORDOVA POLICE 

OFFICER S. PADGETT (badge number 

1174),

Defendants. 

____________________________________/

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, 

by and through their undersigned Counsel, pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 143 and 144 as 

follows:

1) The parties have met and conferred regarding deficiencies and ambiguities in the 

First Amended Complaint filed. 

2) In the interest of expediting this matter, the parties agree that a Second Amended 

Complaint would expedite the law and motion process, and resolve any technical 

deficiencies.

3) Defendants’ responsive pleading and/or motion as to the First Amended Complaint 

is currently due Monday, February 2, 2015.

4) The parties respectfully request that the Court extend the time for Defendants to file 

a responsive pleading and/or motion up to and including February 23, 2015.

5) The parties stipulate and further respectfully request that the Court grant Plaintiffs 

leave to file a Second Amended Complaint by February 10, 2015, with a draft 

emailed to Defendants on February 3, 2015, for the purposes of further meet and 

confer.

Case 2:14-cv-01588-JAM-DB Document 30 Filed 02/02/15 Page 2 of 4
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING, FOR 

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND FOR SERVICE OF SAME

{01359442.DOC}

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6) This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and any facsimile or electronic 

signature shall be as valid as an original signature.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: February 2, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF GARY W. GORSKI

By __/s/Gary W. Gorski_______

Gary W. Gorski 

STRATEGIC LAW COMMAND 

/c/Daniel M. Karalash 

Daniel M. Karalash 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: February 2, 2015 PORTER SCOTT

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

By /s/ Kristina M. Hall

Terence J. Cassidy

Kristina M. Hall

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, COUNTY 

OF SACRAMENTO, RANCHO CORDOVA 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, SACRAMENTO 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, 

MICHAEL GOOLD, G. LANE, SCOTT R. 

JONES, S. CARROZZO, M. JAMES, and S. 

PADGETT

ORDER

Having reviewed the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for 

Defendants to respond to the operative Complaint in this action be, and hereby is, extended to 

February 23, 2015;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Plaintiffs referenced Second Amended Complaint shall 

be filed no later than February 10, 2015.

Case 2:14-cv-01588-JAM-DB Document 30 Filed 02/02/15 Page 3 of 4
4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING, FOR 

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND FOR SERVICE OF SAME

{01359442.DOC}

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 2, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-01588-JAM-DB Document 30 Filed 02/02/15 Page 4 of 4