Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01165/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01165-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-01165 JF 

-1- 

JAMES C. YOON, SBN 177155 

jyoon@wsgr.com 

STEVEN S. BAIK, SBN 184622 

sbaik@wsgr.com 

BART E. VOLKMER, SBN 223732 

bvolkmer@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SanDisk Corporation 

JOHN C. ALTMILLER (pro hac vice) 

PHILIP J. McCABE (Bar No. 201092) 

FRANK L. BERNSTEIN (Bar No. 189504) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

KENYON & KENYON 

333 West San Carlos Street, Suite 600 

San Jose, California 95110 

Telephone: (408) 975-7500 

Facsimile: (408) 975-7501 

 

CARL I. BRUNDIDGE (pro hac vice) 

FREDERICK D. BAILEY (pro hac vice) 

MATTINGLY, STANGER & MALUR, P.C. 

1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 370 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

Telephone: (703) 684-1120 

Facsimile: (703) 684-1157 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Renesas Technology Corp. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

RENESAS TECHNOLOGY CORP., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SANDISK CORPORATION, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C04-01165 JF 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE AND 

) ORDER 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Renesas Technology Corp. and 

Defendant SanDisk Corporation that, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure and the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement, the above-captioned action, 

**E-filed 7/19/05**
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-01165 JF 

-2- 

including all claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses thereto, of whatever kind or nature 

whatsoever, are dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own respective costs and 

attorney’s fees. The parties agree and hereby stipulate that the Decision on Preliminary Motions 

of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences dated April 18, 2003 in Interference No. 

104,760 will be the final determination with respect to ownership of the interference count. 

Dated: July 14, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ 

 James C. Yoon 

Attorneys for Defendant SANDISK 

CORPORATION 

Dated: July 14, 2005 KENYON & KENYON 

By: /s/ 

 Frank L. Bernstein 

Attorneys for Plaintiff RENESAS TECHNOLOGY 

CORP. 
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C04-01165 JF 

-3- 

ECF CERTIFICATION

I, James C. Yoon, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file this ADR Certification. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Frank 

L. Bernstein has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: July 14, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ 

 James C. Yoon 

Attorneys for Defendant SANDISK 

CORPORATION 

ORDER

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The above-captioned action, 

including all claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses thereto, of whatever kind or nature 

whatsoever, are dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own respective costs and 

attorney’s fees. The Decision on Preliminary Motions of the Board of Patent Appeals and 

Interferences dated April 18, 2003 in Interference No. 104,760 will be the final determination 

with respect to ownership of the interference count. 

Dated: _____________ ___________________________________ 

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

 United States District Judge 

7/19/05 /s/electronic signature authorized