Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-mc-00055/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-mc-00055-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 150
Nature of Suit: Overpayments &amp; Enforcement of Judgments
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SCOTT SMITH, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:10-mc-55-JAM-EFB 

ORDER 

On June 22, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant filed objections on July 6, 

2015, and plaintiff filed a response thereto on July 7, 2015. Those filings were considered by the 

undersigned. 

 This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which 

objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 

Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As 

to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court 

assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. United 

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 

Case 2:10-mc-00055-JAM-EFB Document 203 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 

 1. The proposed findings and recommendations filed June 22, 2015, are ADOPTED; and 

 2. Defendant Scott Smith is ordered to appear before the undersigned on July 29, 2015 at 

9:30 a.m. in Courtroom #6 to show cause why Smith should not be found in civil contempt 

until he fully complies with the magistrate judge’s November 26, 2013 order. 

DATED: July 10, 2015 

 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 2:10-mc-00055-JAM-EFB Document 203 Filed 07/13/15 Page 2 of 2