Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04269/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-04269-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 340
Nature of Suit: Marine Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 46:688 Jones Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation and Order Re: Projector Screen CASE NO. C 03 4269 CRB (ARB)

BANNING MICKLOW BULL & LOPEZ LLP

Edward M. Bull, III, State Bar No. 141966

Eugene A. Brodsky, State Bar No. 36691

Jennifer L. Fiore, State Bar No. 203618

One Market, Steuart Tower, Suite 1440

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 399-9191

Facsimile: (415) 399-9192

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JOSEPH F. ARISPE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH F. ARISPE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

TOM TIMMER and ANN TIMMER, in

personam, and F/V DONITA and F/V

BOUNTIFUL, their engines, tackle, apparel,

furniture, etc., in rem,

Defendants. ________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 03 4269 CRB (ARB)

STIPULATION AND ORDER

ALLOWING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL

TO BRING PROJECTOR SCREEN 

INTO COURT FOR TRIAL 

IT IS HEREBY BY STIPULATED by and between the parties in this action, through their

respective counsel, that Plaintiff’s counsel shall be allowed to bring a projector screen and other

necessary equipment to use the screen into Court for trial of this matter as of November 15, 2005

and continuing until trial is concluded, to facilitate the presentation of evidence to the jury. 

The parties therefore request pursuant to Local Rule 7-11 that the Court grant administrative

relief for the authority to bring a projector screen and necessary equipment into Court for trial. 

Particularly, the projector screen will be used during Plaintiff’s closing argument.

///

///

///

Case 3:03-cv-04269-CRB Document 133 Filed 11/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation and Order Re: Projector Screen CASE NO. C 03 4269 CRB (ARB)

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: November 15, 2005 BANNING MICKLOW BULL & LOPEZ, LLP

By: /s/ Edward M. Bull, III

EDWARD M. BULL, III

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: November 15, 2005 COX WOOTTON GRIFFIN HANSEN & POULOS

By: /s/ Terrence S. Cox

TERENCE S. COX

Attorneys for Defendants 

ORDER

The Court has been satisfied that good cause has been shown and hereby ORDERS AND

AUTHORIZES counsel for Plaintiff to be allowed by the U.S. Marshal and any other authorities to

bring a projector screen and necessary equipment to use the screen into this courthouse and

courtroom for him to use in presenting closing argument to the jury. 

DATED: November 15, 2005 _____________________________________________

THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:03-cv-04269-CRB Document 133 Filed 11/15/05 Page 2 of 2