Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_93-cv-00767/USCOURTS-caed-2_93-cv-00767-56/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1 

Stipulation re: Preliminary Injunction (2:93-cv-0767-LKK-GGH (PC)) 

EDMUND G. BROWN JR., State Bar No. 37100 

Attorney General of California 

MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970 

Supervising Deputy Attorney General 

JAMES E. FLYNN, State Bar No. 61139 

Deputy Attorney General 

1300 I Street, Suite 125 

P.O. Box 944255 

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 

Telephone: (916) 323-1976 

Fax: (916) 324-5205 

E-mail: James.Flynn@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendants 

Gomez, White, Cate, Yates, Haws, Flores, and Ortiz

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

WILLIAM ROUSER, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

THEO WHITE, et al., 

Defendants.

2:93-cv-0767-LKK-GGH (PC) 

STIPULATION RE: PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION 

The parties, by their attorneys of record, agree and stipulate as follows: 

1. On April 15, 2010, the Court issued an order for a preliminary injunction. (CR 509.) 

2. Defendants will appeal that order to the Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. 

3. Defendants will file that appeal on or before May 7, 2010. 

4. The parties have conferred with the Chief Circuit Mediator and have agreed to 

participate in the mediation of the case in its entirety, including, but not limited to the preliminary 

injunction order, the appeal of this Court's order denying qualified immunity for defendants 

Gomez and White, and any additional cases or matters which they agree to mediate. 

5. The parties are considering mediation dates in late May or early June of 2010. 

/ / / 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:93-cv-00767-LKK -GGH Document 512 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

2 

Stipulation re: Preliminary Injunction (2:93-cv-0767-LKK-GGH (PC)) 

6. The Chief Circuit Mediator has advised the parties that a stay of the appeal will be 

issued pending mediation, when defendants’ appeal is filed. 

7. Because of those facts, the parties agree that defendants are not required to first seek a 

stay of enforcement of the preliminary injunction in the district court. 

8. If the parties are unable to mediate the dispute, and the stay of the appeal pending 

mediation is lifted, the parties agree that plaintiff can move the district court for enforcement of 

the preliminary injunction, and defendants can oppose that motion or move for a stay in the Ninth 

Circuit Court of Appeal. 

9. In the event the parties are unable to mediate the dispute, and the stay of appeal is lifted, 

the parties agree that the preliminary injunction will take effect as if entered by the Court on the 

date the stay of appeal is lifted. 

Dated: April 28, 2010 

Dated: April 28, 2010 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: April 28, 2010

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

By: /s/ James E. Flynn

JAMES E. FLYNN, State Bar No. 61139 

Deputy Attorney General 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JONES DAY 

By: /s/ Lin Wang [Original On File]

LIN WANG, State Bar No. 261387 

Attorney At Law 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:93-cv-00767-LKK -GGH Document 512 Filed 04/29/10 Page 2 of 2