Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07694/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-07694-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

SF\3139744.1 

345125-9

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 06-07694 JW 

J. ROBERT SHUMAN, JR. (Bar No. 100236) 

bob.shuman@dlapiper.com 

DAVID PRIEBE (Bar No. 148679) 

david.priebe@dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER US LLP 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 

Tel: 650.833.2000 

Fax: 650.833.2001 

LUANNE SACKS (Bar No. 120811) 

luanne.sacks@dlapiper.com 

CARTER W. OTT (Bar No. 221660) 

carter.ott@dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER US LLP 

153 Townsend Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94107 

Tel: 415.836.2500 

Fax: 415.836.2501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

McAFEE, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

LARRY McINTOSH, YANGJIE CHENG, 

PING CHEN, STEVE HAEFFELE, 

LEBIN CHENG, VATSAL SONECHA, 

and JONATHAN WONG, individually and 

on behalf of all those similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

McAFEE, INC., and Does 1-10, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C06 07694 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND 

TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Department: 8 

Judge: Honorable James Ware 

Case 5:06-cv-07694-JW Document 61 Filed 11/29/07 Page 1 of 3
DLA PIPER US LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

2

SF\3139744.1 

345125-9

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 06-07694 JW 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 of the Northern District of California, it is hereby stipulated 

and agreed by Plaintiffs and defendant McAfee, Inc. (“McAfee”), by and through their attorneys 

of record, as follows: 

WHEREAS, the Court previously entered an order on defendant’s motion to dismiss 

which provided Plaintiffs with thirty days in which to amend their complaint and, based on the 

date on which Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint, McAfee’s deadline to respond to 

this pleading was November 15, 2007. 

WHEREAS, due to an inadvertent scheduling error, McAfee was unable to respond by 

November 15, 2007. 

WHEREAS, at McAfee’s request, Plaintiffs agree to provide McAfee with a twelve-day 

extension of this deadline, subject to the Court’s approval. 

WHEREAS, McAfee has not previously asked for a modification of the deadline to 

respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint and this twelve-day extension will not otherwise 

impact the schedule for this case. 

THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree that, subject to the Court’s approval, McAfee’s 

last day to respond to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint shall be continued from November 15, 

2007 to November 27, 2007. 

Dated: November 19, 2007 DLA PIPER US LLP 

By /s/ Carter W. Ott 

CARTER W. OTT 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 McAFEE, INC. 

Dated: November 19, 2007 COTCHETT, PITRE, & MCCARTHY 

By /s/ Mark C. Molumphy 

MARK C. MOLUMPHY 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 

Case 5:06-cv-07694-JW Document 61 Filed 11/29/07 Page 2 of 3
DLA PIPER US LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

3

SF\3139744.1 

345125-9

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 06-07694 JW 

I, Carter W. Ott, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT. In 

compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Mark C. Molumphy has concurred 

in this filing. 

ORDER

 Defendant McAfee, Inc.’s deadline to file and serve a response to Plaintiffs’ First 

Amended Complaint is hereby continued to November 27, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________________ 

By 

HONORABLE JAMES WARE 

 United States District Judge 

is found as moot. November 29, 2007

Case 5:06-cv-07694-JW Document 61 Filed 11/29/07 Page 3 of 3