Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_08-cv-08091/USCOURTS-azd-3_08-cv-08091-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Christine Baker, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

IC System, Inc.; Karen Doe; Turonda Doe;

and Dave Doe, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-8091-PCT-DGC

ORDER

On August 8, 2008, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s motion to allow

electronic filing. Dkt. #11; see Dkt. #8. Plaintiff has filed a motion for reconsideration and

clarification of that order. Dkt. #12.

Motions for reconsideration are disfavored and should be granted only in rare

circumstances. Mere disagreement with an order is an insufficient basis for reconsideration.

Nor should reconsideration be used to make new arguments or to ask the Court to rethink its

analysis. See Ross v. Arpaio, No. CV 05-4177-PHX-MHM (ECV), 2008 WL 1776502, at *2

(D. Ariz. April 15, 2008) (citations omitted); N.W. Acceptance Corp. v. Lynnwood Equip.,

Inc., 841 F.2d 918, 925-26 (9th Cir. 1988).

The Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration because it simply asserts

new arguments that could have been presented in Plaintiff’s initial motion. With respect to

Plaintiff’s request for clarification, the motion to allow electronic filing was denied because

Case 3:08-cv-08091-DGC Document 14 Filed 09/09/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

this Court’s policy is to require pro se litigants to submit documents in paper form so that the

Clerk’s Office can insure that the documents are properly filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. #12) is denied.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for clarification (Dkt. #12) is granted. 

DATED this 9th day of September, 2008.

Case 3:08-cv-08091-DGC Document 14 Filed 09/09/08 Page 2 of 2