Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00574/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00574-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DELBERT WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0574 GEB EFB P

vs.

KAHALE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner, without counsel, seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 9, 2007, the court dismissed plaintiff’s amended complaint for

failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, explained the complaint’s

deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file a second amended complaint correcting those

deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file a second amended complaint would result in

a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. 

The 30-day period since July 9, 2007, has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended

complaint.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to

state a claim upon which relief could be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

////

Case 2:06-cv-00574-GEB-EFB Document 22 Filed 08/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 20 days after

being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections

to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158

F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: August 28, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00574-GEB-EFB Document 22 Filed 08/28/07 Page 2 of 2