Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00807/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00807-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATIONAL RAILROAD )

PASSENGER CORPORATION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

ADMIRAL MERCHANTS MOTOR )

FREIGHT, INC., ROGER )

CREVISTON, COUNTY OF MERCED, ) 

and ATWATER ELECTRIC, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

)

)

AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS. )

)

____________________________________)

CV F 05-0807 AWI DLB

ORDER AMENDING COURT’S

NOVEMBER 30, 2006 ORDER

GRANTING MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Documents #87)

On November 30, 2006, the court issued an order granting Defendant Atwater Electric’s

motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff National Railroad Passenger Corporation

(“Amtrack”) and granting Defendant County of Merced’s motion for summary judgment as to

Plaintiff Amtrack. These motions were granted because Amtrack filed a notice of nonopposition to the motions. Defendant Atwater Electric’s opposed motion for summary

judgment as to the cross-claims of Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc., Roger Creviston, and

County of Merced remains pending, and the court will issue an order in due course.

A review of the court’s November 30, 2006 order indicates that the court mistakenly

referenced a motion for summary judgment filed by Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. in

the heading of the court’s order. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. did not file a motion

Case 1:05-cv-00807-AWI-DLB Document 88 Filed 12/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

for summary judgment. 

The court has the inherent discretion to reconsider and amend prior orders. Barber v.

Hawaii, 42 F.3d 1185, 1198 (9 Cir.1994); United States v. Nutri-cology, Inc., 982 F.2d 394, 396 th

(9 Cir.1992). Accordingly, the court ORDERS that any references to a motion for summary th

judgment filed by Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. in the court’s November 30, 2006 are

STRICKEN. As previously stated, Atwater Electric’s motion for summary judgment as to

Plaintiff Amtrack is GRANTED; and County of Merced’s motion for summary judgment as to

Plaintiff Amtrack is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 5, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00807-AWI-DLB Document 88 Filed 12/06/06 Page 2 of 2