Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00374/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00374-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY PADILLA COLVIN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

JEFF WRIGLEY, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-CV-00374 LJO NEW (DLB) HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #4]

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On March 22, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be GRANTED, and Respondent be ORDERED

to consider the appropriateness of transferring Petitioner to a Residential Re-entry Center (“RRC”) in

light of the factors set forth in § 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed appropriate by the

BOP, without reference to the BOP policy promulgated in December 2002 and without reference to

the BOP’s February 14, 2005, amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings

Case 1:07-cv-00374-LJO-LJO Document 5 Filed 05/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. 

Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued March 22, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED;

3. Respondent be ORDERED to consider the appropriateness of transferring Petitioner to an

RRC in light of the factors set forth in § 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed appropriate

by the BOP, without reference to the BOP policy promulgated in December 2002 and without

reference to the BOP’s February 14, 2005, amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. Respondent is

ORDERED to make this determination promptly, not to exceed 14 days from the date of this Order.

4. Respondent is DIRECTED to file a notice with the Court detailing the hearing within 21

days from the date of this Order;

5. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Petitioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 9, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00374-LJO-LJO Document 5 Filed 05/09/07 Page 2 of 2