Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00053/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00053-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES AND REVISED SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER THEREON 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Timothy R. Sullivan #128467 

McLAUGHLIN SULLIVAN LLP

1396 W. Herndon, Suite 106 

Fresno, California 93711 

Tel: (559) 439-8200 

Fax: (559) 439-8230 

Attorneys for Defendants ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and MARYLAND 

CASUALTY COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS and 

KATHLEEN CURTIS, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY, MARYLAND CASUALTY 

COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 50, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 1:06-CV-00053-OWW-LJO 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES 

AND REVISED SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE ORDER THEREON 

[E.D. Rule 56-260] 

 Plaintiffs ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS and KATHLEEN CURTIS and 

Defendants ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and MARYLAND CASUALTY 

COMPANY, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to continue and 

reschedule the date for filing and hearing non-dispositive motions as set in the Court’s 

Scheduling Order signed May 7, 2006. For ease of reference, the former dates and new dates are 

set forth below: 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-00053-OWW -LJO Document 14 Filed 12/06/06 Page 1 of 2
2 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES AND REVISED SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER THEREON 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MCLAUGHLIN 

SULLIVAN LLP, 

1396 W. HERNDON

SUITE 106 

FRESNO, CA 

93711

FORMER DATE NEW DATE 

NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTION 

FILING DEADLINE 12/15/06 12/15/06 

NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTION 

HEARING DATE 01/05/07 

1/19/2007 AT 9:00 A.M. in 

Courtroom 8 

Good cause exists for this stipulated continuance to permit the parties more 

time to resolve discovery issues; the parties have narrowed the issues, and Plaintiffs have 

agreed to supplement certain responses, but require more time to do so, while Defendants 

do not wish to waive the right to file a motion to compel if answers are not provided or if 

supplemental answers prove to be inadequate. Continuance of the filing and hearing 

deadline should allow the parties time to work these issues out without the need to file a 

motion to compel and involve the Court in these issues. 

Dated: November __, 2006 McLAUGHLIN SULLIVAN LLP 

By: _________________________ 

Timothy R. Sullivan 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY and MARYLAND CASUALTY 

COMPANY 

Dated: November __, 2006 BARBARA COFFMAN 

 By: __________________________ 

Barbara Coffman 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS and 

 KATHLEEN CURTIS 

IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the dates set forth above be, and hereby are, 

adopted by the Court. 

Dated: _December 5,__, 2006 _/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER_____ 

 Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

00011736.000.DOC 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-00053-OWW -LJO Document 14 Filed 12/06/06 Page 2 of 2