Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04493/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04493-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL. - C 06-05374 JW 

GEORGE A. RILEY (State Bar No. 118304)

LUANN L. SIMMONS (State Bar No. 203526)

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 984-8700

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701

E-Mail: griley@omm.com

lsimmons@omm.com

DAVID M. FURBUSH (State Bar No. 83447)

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

2765 Sand Hill Road

Menlo Park, California 94025

Telephone: (650) 473-2600

Facsimile: (650) 473-2601

E-Mail: dfurbush@omm.com

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant

APPLE COMPUTER, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

KELLEY BERGMAN, derivatively on behalf 

of APPLE COMPUTER, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

FRED D. ANDERSON, WILLIAM V. 

CAMPBELL, TIMOTHY D. COOK, 

MILLARD DREXLER, STEVEN P. JOBS, 

RONALD B. JOHNSON, ARTHUR D. 

LEVINSON, MITCHELL MANDICH, 

PETER OPPENHEIMER, JONATHAN 

RUBINSTEIN, AVADIS TEVANIAN, JR., 

JEROME B. YORK, and DOES 1 through 20, 

inclusive,

Defendants,

- and -

APPLE COMPUTER, INC., 

Nominal Defendant.

Case No. C 06-05374 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINTAND REFERRING 

THIS CASE TO JUDGE JEREMY 

FOGEL

Case 5:06-cv-04493-JF Document 12 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL. - C 06-05374 JW

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Kelley Bergman and Nominal 

Defendant Apple Computer, Inc., as follows:

WHEREAS, Bergman filed his Complaint on August 31, 2006;

WHEREAS, counsel are engaged in discussing the possibility of consolidation of this 

matter with related cases and/or the subsequent filing of a consolidated complaint;

WHEREAS, the undersigned parties wish to further judicial efficiency by deferring 

responsive pleadings until such time as consolidation issues are addressed;

WHEREAS, the undersigned parties believe and agree that pursuant to L.R. 3-12(a) the 

instant action is related to the following actions deemed related and currently assigned to Judge 

Jeremy Fogel: (1) Karant v. Jobs, et al., Case No. C06-04128 JF; (2) Holbert v. Anderson, et al., 

Case No. C06-04454 JF; (3) Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. 

Anderson, et al., Case No. C06-04493 JW; (4) Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement 

and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated 

Transit Union v. Jobs, et al., Case No. C06-04510 PJH; (5) Alecci v. Anderson, et al., Case No. 

C06-04649; and (6) Priebe v. Jobs, et al., Case No. C06-04703 WHA. 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to L.R. 6-1, the undersigned parties stipulate as follows:

All defendants who have been served to date, and all defendants who shall subsequently 

accept service and request to be covered by this stipulation, shall have an extension of time to 

answer or otherwise respond to 30 days after the filing of a consolidated complaint, or in the 

event that the Court denies a motion for consolidation, the above-described defendants shall 

answer or otherwise respond to Bergman’s Complaint no later than 30 days after such denial. 

The parties further agree that pursuant to L.R. 3-12(a), this case is related to the above-described 

cases assigned to Judge Jeremy Fogel, and therefore in the interest of judicial economy and 

efficiency, the parties respectfully request that this case be referred to Judge Jeremy Fogel. 

Case 5:06-cv-04493-JF Document 12 Filed 09/08/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL. - C 06-05374 JW 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: September 5, 2006 GEORGE A. RILEY

DAVID M. FURBUSH

LUANN L. SIMMONS

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons

Luann L. Simmons

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant

APPLE COMPUTER, INC.

Dated: September 5, 2006 JOSEPH W. COTCHETT

BRUCE L. SIMON

MARK C. MOLUMPHY

KELLY L. SOMMERFELD

COTCHETT, PITRE, SIMON & 

 MCCARTHY

By: /s/ Mark C. Molumphy

Mark C. Molumphy

Attorneys for Plaintiff

KELLEY BERGMAN

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from Mark C. Molumphy.

Dated: September 5, 2006 GEORGE A. RILEY

DAVID M. FURBUSH

LUANN L. SIMMONS

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons

Luann L. Simmons

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant

APPLE COMPUTER, INC.

Case 5:06-cv-04493-JF Document 12 Filed 09/08/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL. - C 06-05374 JW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________________

______________________________________

The Honorable James Ware

United States District Judge

MP1:987182.1

9/8/06

Case 5:06-cv-04493-JF Document 12 Filed 09/08/06 Page 4 of 4