Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-00267/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-00267-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Michael J. Cohn, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Arizona, State of, 

Respondent.

No. CV-15-00267-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

 

 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 

Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett, (Doc. 52), regarding petitioner’s “Notice of 

deteriorating medical condition and request for relief,” (Doc. 34). The R&R recommends 

that the Court deny Petitioner’s notice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (Doc. 52 at 4 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 

72(b).) Petitioner filed an objection on February 25, 2016. (Doc. 54.) 

The Court has considered the objection and has reviewed the R&R de novo. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the court must make a de novo 

determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific 

objections are made). The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s determinations, 

accepts the recommended decision within the meaning of Rule 72(b), and overrules 

Petitioner’s objection. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may 

accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by 

the magistrate”). 

Case 2:15-cv-00267-DLR Document 56 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, 

(Doc. 54), is accepted. Petitioner’s “Notice of deteriorating medical condition and 

request for relief,” (Doc. 34), is DENIED. 

Dated this 18th day of March, 2016. 

Douglas L. Rayes 

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-00267-DLR Document 56 Filed 03/18/16 Page 2 of 2