Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01386/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01386-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE PEPE CARDOZA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

M. TANN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:11-cv-01386-RRB

ORDER RE: MOTION AT

DOCKETS 131

At Docket 131 Defendants F. Carreon, P. Paz, and R. Pinkham requested clarification

as to the Order Re: Motions at Dockets 92 and 97.

1 The Court addressed the matter raised

in the motion in its Order Regarding Motions at Dockets 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, and 117.

2

Accordingly, Defendants Paz, Carreon, and Pinkham’s Request for Clarification as to Order

Re: Motions at Dockets 92 and 97 is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of October, 2015.

S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 Docket 129.

2 Docket 132.

ORDER RE DOCKET 31

Cardoza v. Tann, 1:11-cv-01386-RRB – 1

Case 1:11-cv-01386-GSA Document 133 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 1