Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01241/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01241-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3:15-CV-01241-WHA

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203)

ELENA K. KOUVABINA (State Bar No. 235918)

ekk@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-3344

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439

Attorneys for Defendant

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC

ANNA ZBITNOFF

P.O. Box 832

Redwood Valley, CA 95470

Telephone: (707) 489-0201

Pro Se Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ANNA ZBITNOFF,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC; 

SAGE POINT LENDER SERVICES; 

and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-CV-01241-WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST)

Judge: The Hon. William H. Alsup

Action Filed: March 17, 2015

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to L.R. 7-12, by and between Defendant 

Nationstar Mortgage LLC (“Nationstar” or “Defendant”) and Plaintiff Anna Zbitnoff, pro se,

(together, the “Parties”), that Plaintiff shall receive a fourteen (14) day extension of time to July 

21, 2014, to file its response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. This is the first stipulation seeking 

an extension of time.

Case 3:15-cv-01241-WHA Document 28 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 3:15-CV-01241-WHA

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is currently due on July 7, 2015. 

The parties stipulate to an extension of time for two reasons. First, Plaintiff misunderstood that 

the response to the originally filed motion would be due on the originally scheduled date after the 

cases were related and the Court ordered that the originally noticed motion should be re-noticed.

After the motion was re-noticed, court staff entered docket text stating the response would due on 

July 21, 2015. Later court staff added a revised docket text stating the response was due on July 7, 

2015. Secondly, the legal document assistant who is assisting Plaintiff has suffered a death in the 

family. Should this stipulation be approved, Defendant will have until July 28, 2015 to file the 

reply brief. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: July 7, 2015 SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Elena Kouvabina

Elena K. Kouvabina

Attorneys for Defendant NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE 

LLC

DATED: July 7, 2015

By: /s/ Anna Zbitnoff

Anna Zbitnoff

Plaintiff Anna Zbitnoff, in pro per

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __________________ By: ____________________________

JUDGE WILLIAM H. ALSUP

July 8, 2015.

Case 3:15-cv-01241-WHA Document 28 Filed 07/08/15 Page 2 of 2