Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02073/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02073-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYNERGY TECH & DESIGN INC. d/b/a

ROAD ARMOR,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JIM TERRY, SANDY TERRY, JIM

MEEKINS, DIXIE MEEKINS, JD

DISTRIBUTING, and ROAD ARMOR USA,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-02073 JSW

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND

HEARING SCHEDULE ON

OUTSTANDING MOTIONS

This matter is set for a hearing on March 9, 2007 on Defendants Jim and Sandy Terry’s

motion to disqualify the Seed IP Law Group PLLC. The Court has ordered that any opposition

to the motion shall be filed by no later than February 9, 2007 and any reply brief shall be filed

by no later than February 16, 2007.

This matter is also set for a hearing on March 23, 2007 on Plaintiff Synergy Tech &

Design, Inc.’s motion for sanctions to enforce the Court’s order re discovery dispute. The Court

HEREBY ORDERS that any opposition to the motion shall be filed by no later February 16,

2007 and any reply brief shall be filed no later than March 2, 2007. 

This matter is also set for a hearing on March 30, 2007 on Plaintiff Synergy Tech &

Design, Inc.’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The Court HEREBY ORDERS

that any opposition to the motion shall be filed by no later February 16, 2007 and any reply

brief shall be filed no later than March 2, 2007. 

Lastly, all three motions shall be heard on March 30, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. The hearing

dates of March 9, 2007 and March 23, 2007 are HEREBY VACATED.

Case 3:06-cv-02073-JSW Document 94 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If the Court determines that any of the pending matters is suitable for resolution without

oral argument, it will so advise the parties in advance of the hearing date. If the parties wish to

modify this schedule, they may submit for the Court’s consideration a stipulation and proposed

order demonstrating good cause for any modification requested.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-02073-JSW Document 94 Filed 01/29/07 Page 2 of 2