Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00238/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00238-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:160(1) National Labor Relations Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1 

ORDER SHORTENING TIME [PROPOSED] 

Case No. 1:06-CV-00238-OWW-LJO 

STEVEN R. FELDSTEIN (Bar No. 59354) 

BROOKE D. ANDRICH (Bar No. 238836) 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

275 Middlefield Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-3506 

Telephone: +1.650.324.7000 

Facsimile: +1.650.324.0638 

Attorneys for Respondent 

FOSTER POULTRY FARMS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALAN B. REICHARD, Regional Director of the 

Thirty-Second Region of the National Labor 

Relations Board, for and on behalf of the 

National Labor Relations Board, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, 

Respondent. 

Case No. 1:06-CV-00238-OWW-LJO 

The Honorable Oliver W. Wanger 

ORDER SHORTENING TIME 

 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-00238-LJO -LJO Document 58 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

2 

ORDER SHORTENING TIME [PROPOSED] 

Case No. 1:06-CV-00238-OWW-LJO 

Having considered Respondent Foster Poultry Farms’ Application for Order 

Shortening Time and Related Stipulation and documents filed in support thereof, and good 

cause appearing, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Respondent’s application is 

GRANTED. 

The parties have agreed to waive oral argument on Respondent’s Motion for Stay 

and the Motion will be deemed submitted upon the filing of Respondent’s Reply in support 

of the Motion. 

The return date for Respondent’s Motion is hereby set for the _______ day of 

_______, 2006. 

Petitioner’s Opposition to the Motion, if any, shall be duly filed with the Court by no 

later than the __19TH___ day of __April________, 2006. 

Respondent’s Reply to Petitioner’s Opposition to the Motion, if any, shall be duly 

filed with the Court by no later than the _21st____ day of __April, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

_/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER__________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

_April 17, 2006_______ 

DATED 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-00238-LJO -LJO Document 58 Filed 04/18/06 Page 2 of 2