Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02988/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02988-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

LUCINDA RAMIREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:15-cv-02988-HRL

ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENT OF

THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

As set forth in the Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions (Dkt. No. 4), this 

matter will be deemed submitted for decision without oral argument based on the parties’ motions 

for summary judgment and/or remand. In connection with their motions, the parties shall file 

either a joint statement or separate statements of the Administrative Record, summarizing: (1) the 

procedural history of the case; (2) testimonial evidence from the hearing(s) before the 

Administrative Law Judge; and (3) all relevant medical evidence of record. Accordingly, the court

orders the parties to meet and confer within 21 days of service of Defendant’s answer for the

purpose of determining whether they are able to file a joint statement of the Administrative

Record, or whether it is necessary for the parties to file separate statements.

A. Joint Statement of the Administrative Record

If the parties are able to agree on a joint statement of Administrative Record, the statement 

shall be signed by both parties and filed by the same deadline as Plaintiff’s motion for summary 

Case 3:15-cv-02988-LB Document 15 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 4
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

judgment or for remand. Each fact must be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and cite 

to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where the fact finds support.

B. Separate Statements of the Administrative Record

If the parties are unable to agree on a joint statement, they shall comply with the following

requirements for separate statements of the Administrative Record.

1. Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of the Administrative Record

At the time Plaintiff files the motion for summary judgment or for remand, Plaintiff must

also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting forth each fact

from the Administrative Record on which Plaintiff relies in support of the motion, including all

relevant medical evidence and written and oral testimony therein. Each fact must be set forth in a

separately numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where

the fact finds support. A failure to submit a separate statement in this form may constitute

grounds for denial of the motion.

2. Defendant’s Statement

At the time Defendant files the cross-motion for summary judgment or for remand,

Defendant must also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting

forth: (a) for each paragraph of Plaintiff’s separate statement, a correspondingly numbered

paragraph indicating whether Defendant disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Plaintiff and,

if disputed, a reference to the specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting

Defendant’s position; and (b) any additional facts from the Administrative Record on which

Defendant relies in support of the motion. Each additional fact must be set forth in a separately

numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where the fact

finds support.

3. Plaintiff’s Reply Statement

If Defendant sets forth additional facts in the cross-motion, Plaintiff shall file a statement,

separate from the reply brief, with correspondingly numbered paragraphs indicating whether

Plaintiff disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Defendant and, if disputed, a reference to the

specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting Plaintiff’s position.

Case 3:15-cv-02988-LB Document 15 Filed 11/05/15 Page 2 of 4
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 5, 2015

________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-02988-LB Document 15 Filed 11/05/15 Page 3 of 4
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

5:15-cv-02988-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Alex Gene Tse alex.tse@usdoj.gov, kathy.terry@usdoj.gov, USACAN.SSA@usdoj.gov

Henry Liheng Chi henry.chi@ssa.gov, sf.ogc.ndca@ssa.gov

Marc V. Kalagian marc.kalagian@rksslaw.com, marckalagian_rohlfinglaw@hotmail.com, 

mayra.pulido@rksslaw.com

Case 3:15-cv-02988-LB Document 15 Filed 11/05/15 Page 4 of 4