Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00162/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00162-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

The body of the Findings and Recommendations made clear that the recommendation for 1

summary dismissal for “patent deficiency” of the application would be “with prejudice.” 

Although the recommendation clause itself contained the words “without prejudice,” this was a

typographical error and the recommendation for summary dismissal is “with prejudice.”

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JODY DEAN SEELYE,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0162 FCD GGH P

vs.

A.K. SCRIBNER, et al., 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has requested an extension of time to file objections to the March 10,

2006 Findings and Recommendations recommending summary dismissal with prejudice of his 1

application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's March 20, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted; 

2. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file

objections to the March 10, 2006 Findings and Recommendations; and

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:06-cv-00162-FCD-GGH Document 7 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3. There will be no further extension of time.

DATED: 3/31/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

seel0162.111+

Case 2:06-cv-00162-FCD-GGH Document 7 Filed 03/31/06 Page 2 of 2