Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04030/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04030-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

STOEL RIVES LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SACRAMENTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER -1-

87266384.1 0204523-00001

THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050)

thomas.woods@stoel.com

BRYAN L. HAWKINS (SB #238346)

bryan.hawkins@stoel.com

STOEL RIVES LLP

500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 447-0700

Facsimile: (916) 447-4781

Attorneys for Defendants 

Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (erroneously sued as 

Specialized Portfolio Servicing, Inc.) and National 

Default Servicing Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVELYN NAND, an individual; 

SUKHANDRA NAND, an individual

Plaintiffs,

v.

SPECIALIZED PORTFOLIO SERVICING, 

INC., a business entity; NATIONAL 

DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, a 

business entity; and DOES 1 through 50, 

inclusive

Defendants.

Case No. 3:16-cv-04030-EMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO 

CONTINUE HEARING DATE AND 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

Complaint Filed: July 18, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-04030-EMC Document 17 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 2
STOEL RIVES LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SACRAMENTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER -2-

87266384.1 0204523-00001

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Evelyn Nand and Sukhandra Nand’s 

(collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (erroneously sued as 

Specialized Portfolio Servicing, Inc.) (“SPS”) and National Default Servicing Corporation’s 

stipulated request to continue the currently scheduled hearing and briefing schedule on Plaintiffs’ 

motion for a preliminary injunction. After considering the Parties’ stipulation and finding good 

cause, the Court GRANTS the Parties’ stipulated request.

The August 4, 2016 hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is continued 

to ______________, 2016. Defendants shall submit their opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion by no 

later than ___________, 2016. Plaintiffs’ reply brief, if any, shall be submitted by no later than 

_________________, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: ________________ ___________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

JUDGE 

Sept. 15 August 30 Sept. 6

7/26/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-04030-EMC Document 17 Filed 07/26/16 Page 2 of 2