Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01368/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01368-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEWCON INTERNATIONAL LTD.,

Plaintiff, No. C 06-1368 PJH

v. ORDER ON STIPULATION

APPROVING MOTIONS TO

AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES INTERVENE AND STAY

NETWORK CORPORATION, and 

DMITRY ROCKLIN a/k/a Dmitry 

Naroditsky,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Intervenor.

_______________________________/

Before the court is the parties’ stipulation, filed March 23, 2006, in connection with

the United States’ pending motions to intervene in, and stay, the instant action. Both

motions are currently scheduled for hearing on April 19, 2006. 

Having reviewed the parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, the court hereby

APPROVES the stipulation entered into by the parties. As such, the United States’ motion

to intervene is GRANTED, and the court further orders the instant case STAYED until

completion of the government’s related criminal grand jury investigation. In order to keep

the court apprised of the status of the government’s related investigation, however, the

parties shall attend case management conferences every three months. The first

scheduled case management conference will be held on July 13, 2006, at 2:30 p.m., in

Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,

California. 

In view of the above, defendants’ pending administrative motion seeking additional

Case 4:06-cv-01368-PJH Document 16 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

time in which to respond to plaintiff’s complaint, is also GRANTED. Defendants’ responsive

pleading shall now be due no later than ten days after the stay ordered herein is lifted. 

The April 19, 2006 hearing date on the government’s motions to intervene and to

stay is hereby VACATED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31, 2006 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-01368-PJH Document 16 Filed 03/31/06 Page 2 of 2