Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05771/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05771-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION TO DISMISS AND CMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 

Dana L. Soong, State Bar No. 168160 

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF SUNNYVALE, 

CHRIS SEARLE and DARREN PANG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ERIKA CANAS, JOSE CANAS, a minor, by 

and through his guardian ad litem, and JESUS 

CANAS, by and through his guardian ad litem, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY OF SUNNYVALE, CHRIS SEARLE, 

DARREN PANG and DOES ONE through 

TWENTY-FIVE, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: C08-05771 JF

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AND CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through their respective undersigned 

attorneys of record, that the date for completion of the Early Neutral Evaluation (hereinafter “ENE”) 

be continued to February 19th 2010. An initial ENE session was held on October 6. The parties and 

evaluator agreed the parties should exchange further discovery and hold a second session on 

November 20, 2009 which date had to be continued because of a scheduling conflict. The Defendant 

City has provided extensive information and documents to both the ENE evaluator and counsel for 

the plaintiffs. The parties have agreed to a second day of ENE on February 11 and respectfully 

request that the time for ENE be continued to February 19, 2010 to allow completion of the ENE 

process. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss plaintiff’s Third 

Amended Complaint and a further Case Management Conference, both currently set for January 15, 

**E-Filed 1/6/2010**

------------------

Case 3:08-cv-05771-TEH Document 54 Filed 01/06/10 Page 1 of 3
2 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION TO DISMISS AND CMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2010 at 9:00 a.m., be continued to Friday March 12, 2010 to allow time for the completion of the 

ENE process. As the ENE may dispose of the case, the parties respectfully request that the court 

continue the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint and the Case 

Management Conference to March 12, 2010. The parties further request court approval of the 

following schedule. 

Plaintiffs’ opposition brief to the motion to dismiss shall be filed and served on or before 

Friday, February 19, 2010. 

Defendant’s reply brief to be filed and served on or before Friday February 26, 2010. 

A joint case management conference statement and Rule 26 Disclosures to be completed and 

the joint cmc statement filed on or before Friday march 5, 2010. 

Dated: December 23, 2009 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

 By: /s/ 

Gregory M. Fox 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF SUNNYVALE, CHRIS SEARLE and 

DARREN PANG 

Dated: December 22, 2009 ROBERTS & ELLIOT LLP 

 By: /s/ 

James Roberts, Esq. 

Sharmi Shah, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ERIKA CANAS, JOSE CANAS, and JESUS CANAS

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

conformed signature (“/s/”) within this E-filed document. 

Dated: December 23, 2009 /s/ 

 Gregory M. Fox 

Case 3:08-cv-05771-TEH Document 54 Filed 01/06/10 Page 2 of 3
3 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION TO DISMISS AND CMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 Good cause appearing, 

 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint and the Case 

Management Conference are continued to 900 am on March 12, 2010. 

Plaintiffs’ opposition brief to the motion to dismiss shall be filed and served on or before 

Friday, February 19, 2010. 

Defendants’ reply brief to be filed and served on or before Friday February 26, 2010. 

A joint case management conference statement and Rule 26 Disclosures to be completed and 

the joint cmc statement filed on or before Friday March 5, 2010. 

THE STIPULATION IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________, 2009 

 __________________________________________ 

 Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

1/4/2010

Case 3:08-cv-05771-TEH Document 54 Filed 01/06/10 Page 3 of 3