Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01487/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01487-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:1801 Farmworker Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On September 30, 2015, Plaintiffs initiated this action in which they claim that Defendants 

committed various labor law violations. (Doc. 1) On October 1, 2015, the Court issued summonses.

(Doc. 2) Nevertheless, Plaintiffs failed to effect service until the Court ordered them to show cause 

why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to prosecute the action. (Doc. 4; Docs. 6-5) 

Now, though the responsive pleadings were due on January 25, 2016, Plaintiffs have taken no action 

to seek default. Therefore, within 21 days Plaintiffs SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions, 

including terminating sanctions, should not be imposed for their further failure to prosecute this action. 

Alternatively, they may seek the clerk’s entry of default within and then file their request for default 

judgment within 21 days of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SANDRA GARYBO, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

LEONARDO BROS., et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01487 --- JLT

ORDER TO PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE 

WHY THE MATTER SHOULD NOT BE 

DISMISSED OR SANCTIONS IMPOSED DUE 

TO THEIR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THE 

ACTION

Case 1:15-cv-01487-DAD-JLT Document 16 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 1:15-cv-01487-DAD-JLT Document 16 Filed 03/03/16 Page 2 of 2