Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05789/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05789-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTPORT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

VASQUEZ, ESTRADA AND CONWAY 

LLP,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-05789-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

Re: ECF No. 86

The Court construes the parties’ stipulated request for a three-week extension of all pretrial deadlines, ECF No. 86, as a stipulated request for all deadlines. So construed, the request is 

granted. The revised schedule for the case will be as follows: 

Event Deadline

Fact discovery cut-off March 3, 2017

Expert disclosures March 10, 2017

Expert rebuttal March 24, 2017

Expert discovery cut-off April 14, 2017

Deadline to file dispositive motions April 28, 2017

Pretrial conference statement due July 11, 2017

Pretrial conference July 21, 2017 at 2:00 

p.m.

Case 3:15-cv-05789-JST Document 87 Filed 08/22/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Trial August 14, 2017 at 

8:30 a.m.

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 22, 2016

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-05789-JST Document 87 Filed 08/22/16 Page 2 of 2