Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04086/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04086-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

PIOTR J. GARDIAS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant. /

No. C04-04086 HRL

Consolidated With: C04-04768 HRL

C05-01242 HRL

C05-01833 HRL

C06-04695 HRL

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION FOR ORDER

SHORTENING TIME

[Docket No. 228]

This court has received a document titled “Application for Order Shortening Time

Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Quashing Subpoenas” filed by plaintiff Piotr Gardias. In it,

plaintiff apparently objects (on privacy grounds) to subpoenas which have been issued by

defendant. The court believes that plaintiff’s objection is sufficient to preclude the production

of requested documents. See FED.R.CIV.P. 45(c)(2)(B) (“If objection is made, the party serving

the subpoena shall not be entitled to inspect, copy, test, or sample the materials or inspect, the

premises except pursuant to an order of the court by which the subpoena was issued).

However, if plaintiff seeks a court order quashing the subpoenas (and assuming that the

subpoenas in question were issued by the Northern District of California), he must file a motion

which complies with Civil Local Rule 7. To the extent he wishes to have that motion heard on

*E-FILED: 7.19.2007*

Case 5:04-cv-04086-HRL Document 237 Filed 07/19/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

shortened time, he should also simultaneously file a request for an order shortening time which

complies with Civil Local Rule 6-3.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

July 19, 2007

Case 5:04-cv-04086-HRL Document 237 Filed 07/19/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:04-cv-4086 A copy of this document will be mailed to:

Piotr J. Gardias 

72 Floyd Street

San Jose, CA 95110 

Plaintiff (Pro Se)

Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

Mary Susan Cain-Simon Mary.CainSimon@doj.ca.gov, David.Moss@doj.ca.gov 

Fiel D. Tigno fiel.tigno@doj.ca.gov

Counsel for Defendant

Case 5:04-cv-04086-HRL Document 237 Filed 07/19/07 Page 3 of 3