Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00283/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00283-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LANDON BRINKMAN and CASE NO. CV F 07-0283 LJO DLB

ANNA JOHNSON,

Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO

RELATE CASES

vs.

GMRI, Inc., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

At an October 19, 2007 scheduling conference, Defendants asserted that Alberto v. GMRI, Inc.,

2:07-CV-1895-WBS-DAD should be related to the above-titled action. The Court read and reviewed

the parties’ joint statement regarding Defendants’ notice of related cases and finds that the definition of

related cases, as set forth in this Court’s Local Rule 83-123, is not satisfied. The cases involve dissimilar

legal issues and different parties. Assignment of the cases to a single judge would not effect a savings

of judicial effort or other economies. Accordingly, the Court orders:

1. Defendants’ request to relate Alberto v. GMRI, Inc., 2:07-CV-1895-WBS-DAD with

Brinkman, et al v. GRMI, Inc., et al., 1:07-CV-283 LJO DLB is denied; and

2. The clerk is directed to file this order on the docket of both cases described above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 29, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00283-LJO-DLB Document 59 Filed 10/29/07 Page 1 of 1