Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01022/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01022-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FURTHER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. C 05-01022 JW (RS) 

RODGER R. COLE (CSB No. 178865) 

rcole@fenwick.com 

RYAN J. MARTON (CSB NO. 223979) 

rmarton@fenwick.com

C. J. ALICE CHEN (CSB No. 228556) 

achen@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center, 801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants 

Advante International Corp. dba Vanteus Academy, 

Yibin Vickie Zhang and Shin Wei 

J. JAMES LI (CSB No. 202855) 

lij@howrey.com

HOWREY LLP 

1950 University Ave., 4th Floor 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Telephone: (650) 798-3500 

Facsimile: (650) 798-3600 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim 

Plaintiffs Mintel Learning Technology, Inc. and 

Ningyuan Wayne Yang 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

Advante International Corp. dba 

Vanteus Academy, an Illinois Corporation, 

and Yibin Vickie Zhang, an individual, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Mintel Learning Technology, Inc., a 

California Corporation, and Ningyuan 

Wayne Yang, an individual, 

Defendants. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case No. C 05-01022 JW (RS) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING 

ORDER 

Date: N/A 

Time: N/A 

Dept: Courtroom No. 8, 4th Floor 

Judge: Hon. James Ware 

Case 5:05-cv-01022-JW Document 177 Filed 10/18/06 Page 1 of 4
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FURTHER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. C 05-01022 JW (RS) 

WHEREAS, on July 13, 2006, the Court entered an order amending the scheduling order 

(“July 13, 2006 Amended Scheduling Order”) setting forth the governing scheduling order in this 

action; 

WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006 plaintiffs and counterclaim defendants Advante 

International Corporation, Yibin Vickie Zhang, Shin Wei (collectively “plaintiffs”), and 

defendants and counterclaim plaintiffs Mintel Learning Technology, Inc. and Wayne Yang 

(collectively “defendants”), filed a joint stipulation and proposed order requesting a modification 

of the Court’s July 13, 2006 Amended Scheduling Order to extend the deadline for expert reports 

to August 31, 2006 and rebuttal expert reports to September 14, 2006, and the Court entered its 

order thereon on August 21, 2006 (the “August 21, 2006 Order”); 

WHEREAS, On October 4, 2006, the parties filed another joint stipulation continuing the 

deadline to raise objections to expert qualifications and testimony, which stipulation was entered 

as on Order of this Court on October 6, 2006 (the “October 6, 2006 Order”); 

WHEREAS, the last day to complete discovery in the Amended Scheduling Order was 

October 13, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties have had to delay fact depositions due to the illness of two 

significant fact witnesses and the schedules of third-parties, and have agreed to proceed with 

these depositions after the close of discovery due to these unforeseen and unavoidable delays; 

WHEREAS, the parties have had to delay the depositions of the damages experts in this 

case due to a death in the family of one the expert witnesses, and the two damages expert 

depositions are currently on hold; 

WHEREAS, Mintel currently has a motion to compel set to be heard by Judge Seeborg on 

November 8, 2006 that raises significant open discovery issues; 

WHEREAS, Advante is currently meeting and conferring with Mintel and may have to 

file a motion to compel to be heard by Judge Seeborg on November 29, 2006 that will raise very 

significant discovery issues; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that a short extension of the current deadlines in the 

Amended Scheduling Order is required to address the outstanding discovery issues fairly to both 

Case 5:05-cv-01022-JW Document 177 Filed 10/18/06 Page 2 of 4
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

FURTHER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

2 CASE NO. C 05-01022 JW (RS) 

parties; 

THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their 

respective attorneys of record, that there is good cause for amending the current scheduling order 

as follows: 

ACTION CURRENT DATE REVISED DATE 

Last day for hearing on 

objections to 

qualifications or proposed 

testimony of an expert 

November 27, 2006 at 9:00 

a.m. 

December 11, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 

Last Day to file 

dispositive motions 

October 30, 2006 December 22, 2006 

Hearing for dispositive 

motions 

December 4, 2006 January 29, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. 

Preliminary Pretrial and 

Trial Setting Conference 

Statement and Proposed 

Order due 

December 29, 2006 March 2, 2007 

Pretrial and Trial Setting 

Conference 

January 8, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. March 12, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. 

Trial TBD March 19-30, 2007 or earliest time 

available thereafter 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: October 17, 2006 

Respectfully submitted, 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s Rodger R. Cole 

Rodger R. Cole 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants 

ADVANTE INTERNATIONAL CORP. dba 

VANTEUS ACADEMY, YIBIN VICKIE ZHANG 

and SHIN WEI 

Case 5:05-cv-01022-JW Document 177 Filed 10/18/06 Page 3 of 4
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

FURTHER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

3 CASE NO. C 05-01022 JW (RS) 

Dated: October 17, 2006 

HOWREY LLP

By: /s J. James Li 

J. James Li 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs 

MINTEL LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, INC. and 

NINGYUAN WAYNE YANG 

I hereby attest that I have received J. James Li’s concurrence in the e-filing of this 

document as indicated by the "conformed" signature (/s) above. 

By: /s Rodger R. Cole 

 Rodger R. Cole

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWING, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ ___________________________ 

 The Honorable James Ware 

 United States District Judge 

10/18/06

Case 5:05-cv-01022-JW Document 177 Filed 10/18/06 Page 4 of 4