Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-3_14-cv-00229/USCOURTS-ared-3_14-cv-00229-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

JONESBORO DIVISION 

YOLANDA GOODMAN, On Behalf of Herself 

and All Similarly Situated Persons 

v. No. 3:14-cv-229-DPM 

PLAINTIFF 

CRITTENDEN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, 

INC., ET AL. DEFENDANTS 

ORDER 

Goodman's motion to compel, NQ 89, is denied as moot based on 

counsel's attached letter, which the Court appreciates. 

So Ordered. 

D.P. Marshall Jr. 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:14-cv-00229-DPM Document 90 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 3
LAW OFFICES 

BALLIN, BALLIN & FISHMAN, P.C. 

200 JEFFERSON A VENUE 

MARVIN E. BALUN 

LESUE I. BALUN 

RANDALL}. FISHMAN 

C. BARRY WARD 

GRAY W. BARTLETI 

BLAKE D. BALUN 

TIM EDWARDSt•I 

RICHARDS. TOWNLEY 

SAMUEL M. FARGOTSTEIN 

BENJAMIN D. KATZ 

KEVIN M. McCORMACK 

ANDREW R. CARR, JR. 

Special Counsel 

Honorable D.P. Marshall, Jr. 

United States District Judge 

SUITE 1250 

MEMPI-flS, TENNESSEE 38103-2357 

Telephone (901) 525-6278 

Facsimile (901) 525-6294 

www.bbfpc.com 

August 25, 2015 

600 West Capitol Avenue, Room B149 

Little Rock, AR 72201 

Re: Goodman, et al vs. Crittenden Hospital Asscn., et al 

No. 3:14-cv-229-DPM 

Our File No.: 1409-2202 

Dear Judge Marshall: 

JENNIFER L. MILLER 

Paralegal 

B. JUNE YOUNG 

Paralegal 

DIANE ASBRIDGE 

Paralegal 

BRANDY JACKSON 

Office Administrator 

jCERTIFIED CIVIL 11UAL SP£CIAUST 

-cERTIFIED CIVIL PRETRIAL PRAcnCE ADVOCATE 

t ALSO UCENSEO IN ARKANSAS, KlNI\JCKV & MONTANA 

Subsequent to Plaintiff's filing of the Motion to Compel Rule 26 Disclosures, we did 

receive disclosures from defendants Cigna, Crittenden Hospital Association, Inc., and 

individuals. In my Motion, I should have pointed out (my oversight) that defendant 

Methodist long ago had filed its disclosures and should not have been the subject of the 

Motion to Compel. At any rate, that Motion has now been rendered moot by the filing 

of disclosures. 

TE/da 

cc: electronically mailed to: 

Case 3:14-cv-00229-DPM Document 90 Filed 08/31/15 Page 2 of 3
Plaintiffs' counsel: 

Roger Dennis Sumpter, II, Esq. 

Vincent 0. Chadick, Esq. 

Frank Watson, Esq. 

Bill Bums, Esq. 

Kevin McCormack, Esq. 

Defense counsel: 

John I. Houseal, J r 

Don L. Hearn, J r 

Mark W. Peters 

jhouseal®glankler .com, 

dhearn®glanker .com 

mpeters@wallerlaw.com, 

Joh..~.'l E. B. Gerth jeb.g*"rth@wallerlaw.com 

Harry S. Hurst, Jr hhurst®phbfirm.com 

Peter E. Pederson ppederson®hinshawlaw.com 

Daniel K. Ryan dryan®hinshawlaw.com 

Leigh M. Chiles lchiles®bakerdonelson.com 

Matthew S. Mulqueen mmulqueen@bakerdonelson.com 

Buckner P. Wellford, Esq. bwellford@bakerdonelson.com 

Case 3:14-cv-00229-DPM Document 90 Filed 08/31/15 Page 3 of 3