Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00449/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00449-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAURO ALEJANDRO, III, CASE NO. CV F 06-0449 OWW LJO

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR SERVICE OF AMENDED

COMPLAINT

vs.

JASON WILLIAMSON #876, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff Maurao Alejandro, III (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner and proceeds pro se in this action.

Plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed May 18, 2006, is pending before this Court. This Court has granted

plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, this Court:

1. ORDERS that service is appropriate for defendant Bakersfield Police Officers Jason

Williamsson #876 and Aaron Stringer #973 and defendant California Highway Patrol

Officers Ashe #16947 and Fallas #14770;

2. DIRECTS this Court’s clerk to send plaintiff four USM-285 forms, four summonses, an

instruction sheet and a copy of plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed May 18, 2006; and

3. ORDERS plaintiff, no later than June 27, 2006, to complete the Notice of Submission

of Documents and submit the completed Notice to this Court with the following

documents:

a. One completed summons for each defendant noted above;

Case 1:06-cv-00449-OWW -GSA Document 9 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant noted above; and 

c. Four copies of the endorsed amended complaint, filed May 18, 2006. 

Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon

receipt of the above-described documents, the Court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the

above-named defendants pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 4 without payment of costs. 

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss this

action for failure to obey this Court’s order. Local Rule 11-110.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 23, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00449-OWW -GSA Document 9 Filed 05/23/06 Page 2 of 2