Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03933/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03933-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO MODIFY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

Robert W. Stone (CA Bar No. 163513) 

robertstone@quinnemanuel.com 

Andrew J. Bramhall (CA Bar No. 253115) 

andrewbramhall@quinnemanuel.com 

Brice C. Lynch (CA Bar No. 288567) 

bricelynch@quinnemanuel.com 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

T: 650.801.5000 

F: 650.801.5100 

Attorneys for IBM CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TWIN PEAKS SOFTWARE INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

IBM CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

 CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO MODIFY CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 

Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-03933-JST Document 46 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO MODIFY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software Inc. (“Twin Peaks”) and 

Defendant International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), by and through their respective 

counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an order to move the claim 

construction hearing date, currently scheduled for December 8, 2015, (Dkt. No. 29), by one week 

to December 15, 2015, or to the earliest date after December 15, 2015 that is amenable to the 

Court (other than during the weeks of December 28, 2015 and January 4, 2016). In support of this 

request, the parties state as follows: 

WHEREAS, lead counsel for IBM, Robert W. Stone, is unavailable to attend the claim 

construction hearing on December 8, 2015 because Mr. Stone was just scheduled for oral 

argument before the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. on December 9, 2015, TransPerfect 

Global, Inc. v. MotionPoint Corporation, Case No. 2015-1165 (Fed. Cir.); 

WHEREAS, counsel for Twin Peaks and counsel for IBM met and conferred regarding 

this issue, and counsel for Twin Peaks agreed to move the claim construction hearing date and has 

no objections; 

WHEREAS, counsel for both parties are unavailable during the weeks of December 28, 

2015 and January 4, 2016; 

WHEREAS, counsel for both parties have further agreed that there is no need to move the 

technical tutorial, currently scheduled for November 17, 2015, (Dkt. No. 29), unless the Court is 

so inclined; 

WHEREAS, this is the third time the parties have sought to make modifications to the 

Court’s scheduling order and, prior to this motion, IBM and Twin Peaks have made only three 

requests to extend deadlines in this case (Dkt. Nos. 10, 33, and 40); 

WHEREAS, the parties’ request to move the claim construction hearing one week does not 

affect the date of the technology tutorial (Nov. 17, 2015), nor does it reduce the time available to 

the Court to review materials between the conclusion of claim construction briefing (Oct. 30, 

2015) and the claim construction hearing. The proposed modifications also do not affect any 

deadlines for filing or lodging materials with the Court; 

Case 3:14-cv-03933-JST Document 46 Filed 10/27/15 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO MODIFY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

WHEREAS, the parties do not believe the extension sought hereby will prejudice either 

party or result in undue delay; 

WHEREAS, counsel for IBM, Robert W. Stone, has submitted a supporting declaration 

with this stipulation pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a); 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the forgoing, IBM and Twin Peaks by and 

through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the Court move the claim 

construction hearing date, currently scheduled for December 8, 2015, (Dkt. No. 29), by one week 

to December 15, 2015, or to the earliest date after December 15, 2015 that is amenable to the 

Court (other than during the weeks of December 28, 2015 and January 4, 2016). 

Case 3:14-cv-03933-JST Document 46 Filed 10/27/15 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3- CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO MODIFY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: October 27, 2015 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

By /s/ Andrew J. Bramhall 

Andrew J. Bramhall 

Attorney for Defendant International Business 

Machines Corporation 

DATED: October 27, 2015 HAUSFELD LLP 

By /s/ Bruce J. Wecker 

Bruce J. Wecker 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Twin Peaks Software Inc..

Case 3:14-cv-03933-JST Document 46 Filed 10/27/15 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST

[PROPOSED] ORDER

TO MODIFY CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court hereby modifies the Scheduling Order as 

follows: the claim construction hearing date, currently scheduled for December 8, 2015, is reset to 

December 15, 2015. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: __________________ 2015 

By 

Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

October 27,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-03933-JST Document 46 Filed 10/27/15 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-03933-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO MODIFY CASE DEADLINES PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2

FILER’S ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i) regarding signatures, I, Andrew J. Bramhall, attest that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I 

declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing 

is true and correct. 

DATED: October 27, 2015 By /s/ Andrew J. Bramhall 

Andrew J. Bramhall 

Attorney for Defendant International Business 

Machines Corporation 

Case 3:14-cv-03933-JST Document 46 Filed 10/27/15 Page 6 of 6