Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01866/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01866-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEIF BERGMAN, et al., CASE NO. CV F 11-1866 LJO GSA 

Plaintiff, ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION REQUEST

AND TO PERMIT DEFENSE REPLY 

vs. (Doc. 57.)

MICHAEL P. TOBIN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

On November 21, 2012, defendants Michael P. Tobin and Holly W. Tobin (collectively the

“Tobins”)filed their request to reconsider (doc. 57) the Findings andRecommendations Denying Motion

to Expunge Lis Pendens (doc. 56). This Court construes the Tobins’ reconsideration request as

objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), which provides in pertinent part:

Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any partymay serve and file written

objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court.

A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report

or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. A judge

of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.

This Court will conduct a de novo review of the findings and recommendations, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and thus will not treat the Tobin’s reconsideration request as proceeding under Local

Rule 303(c), which employs the standard of review of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). No later than

1

Case 1:11-cv-01866-LJO-GSA Document 58 Filed 11/26/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

December 4, 2012, the other parties may file a response to the Tobins’ reconsideration request. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 26, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:11-cv-01866-LJO-GSA Document 58 Filed 11/26/12 Page 2 of 2