Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05476/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05476-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

GREGORY L. RHOADES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

ALAMEIDA, et al., )

) 

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 02-5476 AWI DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM 285 FORMS

Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed May 19, 2005. The

amended complaint appears to state a cognizable claim for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

E. ALAMEIDA

F.A. BROWN

R. VOGEL

D. ADKINSON

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff four (4) USM-285 forms, four (4) summons, an

instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed September 17, 2002.

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice

Case 1:02-cv-05476-AWI-DLB Document 28 Filed 09/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 2

of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the court with the following

documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Five (5) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed May 19, 2005. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. 

Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to

serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of

costs. 

5. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of

this action. Local Rule 11-110.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 7, 2005 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05476-AWI-DLB Document 28 Filed 09/08/05 Page 2 of 2