Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05361/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05361-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

VELLA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05361-REC-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 13)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff, Anthony Johnson (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 11, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within fifteen (15)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

Case 1:04-cv-05361-REC-LJO Document 14 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed January 11,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is

DISMISSED; and,

3. This action is therefore DISMISSED for plaintiff’s

failure to comply with a Court Order and failure to state a claim

upon which relief can be granted.

4. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05361-REC-LJO Document 14 Filed 02/10/06 Page 2 of 2