Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01692/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01692-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MACK A. WEST JR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RYAN PETTIGREW, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:11-cv-1692 JAM CKD P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On November 20, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff and defendants 

have both filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis. 

///// 

Case 2:11-cv-01692-JAM-CKD Document 204 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 20, 2014, are adopted in full; 

 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 139) is granted in part and denied in part as 

follows: 

 a. Defendants Pettigrew and Vira are dismissed from this action with prejudice; 

 b. All claims against defendants Gayton, Ortega and Coyle based on events prior 

to November 20, 2008 are dismissed; and 

 c. Defendants’ motion is otherwise denied. 

DATED: March 5, 2015 

 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 2:11-cv-01692-JAM-CKD Document 204 Filed 03/06/15 Page 2 of 2