Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01676/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01676-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Otmar Wittine,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 03-1676 LKK PAN P

vs. Order

F. T. Deschler, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoJanuary 19, 2005, the district judge declined to adopt

findings and recommendations to dismiss this action for failure

to state a claim. February 22, 2005, plaintiff filed a paper

styled, “Amendment to Complaint” in which he identifies the Doe

defendants.

To include the Doe defendants, plaintiff must submit an

amended complaint that is “retyped and filed so that it is

complete in itself without reference to the prior superseded

pleading.” L. R. 15-220.

Case 2:03-cv-01676-LKK -EFB Document 18 Filed 06/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, plaintiff has 15 days from the date this order

is served to file an amended complaint.

So ordered.

Dated: June 7, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01676-LKK -EFB Document 18 Filed 06/08/05 Page 2 of 2