Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00665/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00665-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 00:0000 Cause Code Unknown

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE VIZCAINO, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0665 GEB KJM PS

vs.

STANISLAUS COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed December 27, 2004, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed

with leave to file a second amended complaint. Since that time, plaintiff has been granted two

extensions of time in which to file a second amended complaint. The time allowed to plaintiff

for filing an amended complaint has expired. Plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:04-cv-00665-GEB -KJM Document 19 Filed 05/11/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 10, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

vizc0665.fta

Case 2:04-cv-00665-GEB -KJM Document 19 Filed 05/11/05 Page 2 of 2