Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03326/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03326-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 54379205.1 

STIPULATION, ORDER RE: HEARING DATE 

U.S.D.C, N.D. Cal, No. C-06-03326-SBA 

JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

55 Second Street, 24th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 856-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 

jeffwohl@paulhastings.com 

STEPHEN H. HARRIS (Cal. State Bar No. 184608) 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Telephone: (213) 683-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 

stephenharris@paulhastings.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Los Alamos National Security, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNIVERSITY PROFESSIONAL AND 

TECHNICAL EMPLOYEES, CWA 

LOCAL 9119, AFL-CIO; RICHARD 

MONTOYA; CATHERINE CHAPMAN; 

THOMAS MARKS; and MANUEL 

TRUJILLO, 

Plaintiffs/Petitioners, 

vs. 

BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE 

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; LOS 

ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC; 

and DOES 1 TO 40, inclusive, 

Defendants/Respondents. 

No. C-06-03326-SBA 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 

CONTINUANCE OF DUE DATE FOR 

REPLIES ON PARTIES’ PENDING 

MOTIONS AND RE-SCHEDULING OF 

CMC DATES 

Hearing Date: November 7, 2006 

Hearing Time: 1:00 p.m. 

Courtroom: 3 

Judge: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 

Trial date: Not yet set 

Case 4:06-cv-03326-SBA Document 36 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 54379205.1 

STIPULATION, ORDER RE: HEARING DATE 

U.S.D.C, N.D. Cal, No. C-06-03326-SBA 

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs University Professional and Technical Employees, CWA Local 9119, AFL-CIO; 

Richard Montoya, Catherine Chapman, Thomas Marks, and Manuel Trujillo; and defendants The 

Regents of the University of California and Los Alamos National Security, LLC, acting through their 

respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. The Court currently has noticed before it for hearing on November 7, 2006, plaintiffs’ 

motion to remand this action to state court; and defendants’ assorted motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ First 

Amended Complaint, to strike plaintiffs’ demand for monetary relief, and for a more definite statement 

of the injunctive relief they seek. This motion originally was noticed for hearing on September 26, 

2006, and after the parties requested a continuance to accommodate the schedule of counsel for 

defendant Los Alamos National Security, LLC, the Court re-set the hearing for November 7, 2006. 

2. In light of the continued hearing date, the parties would like additional time to prepare 

their replies in support of the motions. The parties propose a new due date of October 10, 2006, which 

would provide four weeks before the hearing for the Court to consider the replies along with the other 

motion papers. 

3. Also as a consequence of the continuance of the motion-hearing date to November 7, 

2006, and the possible outcomes of the motion (which include a remand of this action to state court or a 

dismissal of this action), the parties believe there is good cause to continue the case management dates 

as follows so to avoid possibly unnecessary work and related expenses: 

Event Current Date Proposed New Date 

Last day for parties to meet and 

confer regarding initial 

disclosures, early settlement, 

ADR processes, and discovery; 

last day for parties to file ADR 

certification and either 

stipulation to ADR process or 

notice of need for ADR 

telephone conference 

November 2, 2006 December 4, 2006 

Last day for parties to complete 

their initial disclosures or state 

objections in Rule 26(f) report, 

November 22, 2006 December 20, 2006 

Case 4:06-cv-03326-SBA Document 36 Filed 09/15/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 54379205.1 -2- STIPULATION, ORDER RE: HEARING DATE

U.S.D.C, N.D. Cal, No. C-06-03326-SBA

Event Current Date Proposed New Date 

file case management statement 

and Rule 26(f) report 

Initial case management 

conference (3:00 p.m 

December 6, 2006 January 8, 2007 

4. The parties therefore believe there is good cause and respectfully request that the Court 

approve this stipulation and reset the dates as requested. 

Dated: September ___, 2006. ARTHUR A. KRANTZ 

LEONARD CARDER, LLP 

By: ____________________________________________ 

Arthur A. Krantz 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

University Professional and Technical Employees, 

CWA Local 9119, AFL-CIO; Richard Montoya, 

Catherine Chapman, Thomas Marks, and 

Manuel Trujillo 

Dated: September ___, 2006. MARY C. OPPEDAHL 

REED SMITH LLP 

By: ____________________________________________ 

Mary C. Oppedahl 

Attorneys for Defendant 

 The Regents of the University of California 

Dated: September ___, 2006. JEFFREY D. WOHL 

STEPHEN H. HARRIS 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

By: ____________________________________________ 

Jeffrey D. Wohl 

Attorneys for Defendant 

 Los Alamos National Security, LLC 

Case 4:06-cv-03326-SBA Document 36 Filed 09/15/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 54379205.1 -3- STIPULATION, ORDER RE: HEARING DATE

U.S.D.C, N.D. Cal, No. C-06-03326-SBA

ORDER

On the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS ORDERED that the replies in support of the motion of plaintiffs University Professional 

and Technical Employees, CWA Local 9119, AFL-CIO; Richard Montoya, Catherine Chapman, 

Thomas Marks, and Manuel Trujillo to remand this action to state court and the respective motions of 

defendant The Regents of the University of California and Los Alamos National Security, LLC, to 

dismiss plaintiffs’ plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, to strike their demand for monetary relief, and 

for a more definite statement of the injunctive relief they seek may be filed by October 10, 2006. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case management dates will be reset as follows: 

Event Current Date Proposed New Date 

Last day for parties to meet and 

confer regarding initial 

disclosures, early settlement, 

ADR processes, and discovery; 

last day for parties to file ADR 

certification and either 

stipulation to ADR process or 

notice of need for ADR 

telephone conference 

November 2, 2006 December 4, 2006 

Last day for parties to complete 

their initial disclosures or state 

objections in Rule 26(f) report, 

file case management statement 

and Rule 26(f) report 

November 22, 2006 December 20, 2006 

Initial case management 

conference (3:00 p.m.) via 

telephone. Plaintiff’s Counsel 

shall initiate the conference call 

and call the Court with all parties 

on the line at (510)637-3559. 

December 6, 2006 January 10, 2007 

Dated: September 15, 2006. __________________________________________ 

Saundra Brown Armstrong 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:06-cv-03326-SBA Document 36 Filed 09/15/06 Page 4 of 4