Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-md-02143/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-md-02143-170/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case No. 10-md-02143-RS (JCS)

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1984

The Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs brought an administrative motion to file under seal (dkt. 

1984) Exhibit A to the joint letter brief dated October 26, 2016. The only stated basis for sealing 

is that Defendants designated material contained therein as confidential pursuant to the protective 

order in this case. Defendants did not file a responsive declaration as required by Civil Local Rule 

79-5(e)(1). The administrative motion is therefore DENIED, and the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs 

are instructed to file Exhibit A to the October 26 letter brief in the public record no sooner than 

November 8, 2016 and no later than November 14, 2016. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(2).1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 4, 2016

______________________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

Chief Magistrate Judge

 

1 Although the discovery dispute has since been resolved, see dkt. 1993, a public version of 

Exhibit A remains necessary to complete the public record of this action. 

Case 3:10-md-02143-RS Document 1996 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 1