Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00665/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00665-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODERICK COLEMAN, 

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

MICHAEL HENNESSEY, Sheriff, et al.,

Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 10-0665 CRB (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

(Docket # 2)

On February 17, 2010, while plaintiff was incarcerated at the San

Francisco County Jail, he filed a pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. §

1983 alleging various violations of his constitutional rights, including

inappropriate denial of his doctor-approved "medical appliances" and sexual

harassment. He also sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915 (docket # 2), which, based solely on his affidavit of poverty, is granted.

Plaintiff has since filed additional pleadings suggesting that he wishes to

allege additional claims and name additional defendants. Good cause appearing,

plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with leave to amend to incorporate all

allegations and defendants into one complaint within 30 days of this order. The

pleading must be simple and concise and must include the caption and civil case

number used in this order and the words FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT on

the first page. Failure to file a proper amended complaint within the designated

time will result in the dismissal of this action.

Case 5:10-cv-00665-LHK Document 8 Filed 07/02/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Plaintiff is advised that the amended complaint will supersede the original

complaint and all other earlier pleadings. Claims and defendants not included in

the first amended complaint will not be considered by the court. See King v.

Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 1, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.10\Coleman, R1.dwlta.wpd

Case 5:10-cv-00665-LHK Document 8 Filed 07/02/10 Page 2 of 2