Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05528/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05528-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEX PRICE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

F. ALVARADO, MD,

Defendant. /

No. C-09-5528 TEH (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On November 20, 2009, Plaintiff filed a pro se civil

rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that officials at

San Quentin State Prison were deliberately indifferent to his

serious medical needs. Doc. #1. The Court notified Plaintiff in

writing at that time that the action was deficient because he did

not pay the requisite $ 350.00 filing fee or, instead, submit a

signed and completed court-approved in forma pauperis application,

including a completed certificate of funds in his prison account and

a copy of his prison trust account statement for the last six months

obtained from the appropriate prison official. See 28 U.S.C. §

1915(a)(2). Plaintiff was advised that failure to file the

Case 3:09-cv-05528-TEH Document 5 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

requested items within thirty (30) days would result in dismissal of

the action. Doc. #3. 

On December 21, 2009, Plaintiff sought clarification on

the items he needed to file and an extension of time by which to

file them. Doc. #4. In response, the Court on December 28, 2009

sent the appropriate in forma pauperis application to Plaintiff at

the non-custody address Plaintiff listed in his letter. To date,

Plaintiff has not returned the in forma pauperis application nor

sought another extension of time to do so. As a result, the action

is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint

and completed in forma pauperis application, which the Clerk shall 

file as a new action with a new case number. 

The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions as

moot and close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED 01/29/10 

THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.09\Price-09-5528-dismiss-ifp.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-05528-TEH Document 5 Filed 01/29/10 Page 2 of 2