Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06307/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06307-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK CARRILLO BONILLA, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

MIKE KNOWLES, et al., )

)

)

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:02-cv-06307-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE TRAVERSE (Doc. 27)

On October 15, 2002, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254 in this Court. (Doc. 1). 

On February 12, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed Findings and

Recommendations recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied on the merits. 

(Doc. 23). On March 12, 2007, the United States District Judge assigned to the case adopted the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 25), entered judgment in favor of

Respondent, and ordered that the case be closed. (Doc. 26). 

Subsequently, on March 19, 2007, Petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to

file his traverse. (Doc. 28). Because the Court had already ruled on the merits of the petition,

entered judgment, and closed the case, Petitioner’s motion is untimely and moot. Accordingly,

///

///

Case 1:02-cv-06307-LJO -TAG Document 29 Filed 02/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time to file his

traverse (Doc. 27) is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 13, 2008 /s/ Theresa A. Goldner 

j6eb3d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:02-cv-06307-LJO -TAG Document 29 Filed 02/15/08 Page 2 of 2