Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-02706/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-02706-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 230
Nature of Suit: Rent, Lease, Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal

---

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PAUL BOSCHETTI, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

DANIEL O’BLENIS, 

 Defendant. 

________________________________/ 

No. 13-2706 CW 

ORDER INSTRUCTING 

DEFENDANT TO 

RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

TO AMEND THE PREFILING ORDER 

 

On July 2, 2015, Plaintiff Paul Boschetti moved the Court to 

modify an existing pre-filing order in this case. See August 23, 

2013 Pre-Filing Order, Docket No. 23. In that order, the Court 

instructed the Clerk of the Court not to accept any notice of 

removal from Defendant Daniel O’Blenis (also known as Daniel 

Everett) unless that notice of removal had first been reviewed by 

the Court. 

Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has made multiple threats of 

litigation in order to intimidate him from re-renting the 

apartment that is at issue in this case. Accordingly, Plaintiff 

moves to have Defendant barred from “filing any action, 

proceeding, motion, petition, appeal, request for relief, or 

otherwise, in any federal, state, territorial, or tribal court 

. . . which relates in any way, shape, or form to [Defendant’s] 

former apartment located at 261 Pierce Street, Unit #5, San 

Francisco, California” without first seeking leave to do so from 

the Court. Docket No. 45. 

Case 4:13-cv-02706-CW Document 47 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The deadline for Defendant to respond to this motion was July 

16, 2015. As of the date of this order, Defendant has not done 

so. 

Accordingly, the Court orders that if Defendant opposes this 

motion he must file his opposition no later than July 30, 2015. 

Defendant is advised that if he does not respond to the motion, 

the Court is inclined to grant it. The Clerk of the Court shall 

ensure that Defendant receives a copy of this order and the 

motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 21, 2015 

CLAUDIA WILKEN 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:13-cv-02706-CW Document 47 Filed 07/21/15 Page 2 of 2