Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02846/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02846-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

TURO, et. al.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ORACLE CORP.,

Defendant. 

No. C 06-02846 SBA

ORDER

[Docket No. 34]

Previously before the Court was the parties’ Joint Motion for Order Provisionally Certifying

Settlement Class and Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Proposed Notices to Class Members

(the “Motion”) [Docket No. 26], requesting the Court (1) preliminarily certify two sub-classes for

purposes of settlement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b); (2) preliminarily certify a

proposed collection of plaintiffs for notice and settlement under the Fair Labor and Standards Act of

1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (the “FLSA”); and (3) preliminarily approve the parties’

Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement Between Plaintiffs and Defendant; Settlement

Agreement and Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) [Docket No. 25].

After reading and considering these papers, the Court was inclined to approve the Motion,

subject to the parties addressing certain concerns as subsequently identified in the Court’s Order

dated March 10, 2008 [Docket No. 30]. After issuing this Order, the Court took a March 11, 2008

hearing regarding the Motion, off calendar, so the parties could address its concerns. 

On March 18, 2008, the parties filed a Joint Response to Court’s Order of March 10, 2008

[Docket No. 34]. This document consists of a proposed Notice to Class of Proposed Settlement of

Class Action (the “Notice”). See Docket No. 34, Ex. “A.” The Notice references two other

documents containing the “only complete statement of the terms of proposed settlement[,]” id.

at 9:12-13, a Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement Between Plaintiffs and Defendant and a

Settlement Agreement and Release, id. at 9:13-14. The parties did not file these other two

///

Case 4:06-cv-02846-SBA Document 36 Filed 03/26/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

documents nor have they indicated a time frame for doing so. The Court cannot rule on the parties’

Motion without these two documents. Accordingly, the parties have seven days from the date of

the entry of this order to file these two documents with the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

March 26, 2008 _________________________________

Saundra Brown Armstrong 

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-02846-SBA Document 36 Filed 03/26/08 Page 2 of 2