Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02660/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02660-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAVID HALTERMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

EMC CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 04-2660 JW (PVT)

INTERIM ORDER RE STIPULATION

TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXCERPTS OF

DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

DOCUMENTS

On August 30, 2005, the parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to File under Seal

Excerpts of Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Documents.1 Based on the

stipulation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than September 9, 2005, any party contending that

any of the information sought to be sealed warrants protection under Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure 26(c) shall file a declaration setting forth facts showing that such sealing is warranted. 

See CIVIL L.R. 79-5(a) (“A stipulation, or a blanket protective order that allows a party to designate

documents as sealable, will not suffice to allow the filing of documents under seal.”); see also

Beckman Indus., Inc. v. International Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992) (“Broad allegations

of harm, however, unsubstantiated by specific examples or articulated reasoning, do not satisfy the

Rule 26(c) test.”) 

Dated: 8/31/05

 /s/ Patricia V. Trumbull 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:04-cv-02660-JW Document 114 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 1