Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01007/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01007-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLEN MOFIELD, No. 06-cv-01007 OWW TAG

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLAINTIFF’S

SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT

vs. (Doc. 20)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO

Commissioner of Social Security, ENTER JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE AND AGAINST

PLAINTIFF GLEN MOFIELD AND TO 

 Defendant. CLOSE THIS MATTER

 /

Plaintiff Glen Mofield (“Plaintiff”), through counsel, filed a complaint seeking judicial

review of an administrative decision denying his claim for disability insurance benefits under

Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. (Doc. 2). The matter has been

referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b) and Local Rule 72-302(c)(15). 

On January 25, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations which

were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and

Recommendations were to be filed within fifteen (15) days of the date of service. (Doc. 20). 

The parties have not filed any objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 72(b), and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case.

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations

filed on January 25, 2008, to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.

Case 1:06-cv-01007-OWW -TAG Document 21 Filed 02/13/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 25, 2008 (Doc. 20), are

ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The Plaintiff’s Social Security complaint is DENIED; and 

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Defendant Michael J. Astrue;

and against Plaintiff Glen Mofield, and to close this action

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01007-OWW -TAG Document 21 Filed 02/13/08 Page 2 of 2