Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04656/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04656-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA1 60146386.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE

Case No. C 05-4656 PJH

Robert F. Hinton, Bar No. 98110 

RFHinton@rkmc.com 

David Martinez, Bar No. 193183 

DMartinez@rkmc.com 

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 

2049 Century Park East, Suite 3700 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3211 

Telephone: 310-552-0130 

Facsimile: 310-229-5800 

Attorneys for Defendants 

BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC. and 

BEST BUY CO., INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IDENTITY ARTS, a California Limited 

Liability Company, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, 

INC., a Minnesota Corporation, BEST 

BUY CO., INC., a Minnesota Corporation 

and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 05-4656 PJH 

 related to 

Case No. C 06-1631 PJH 

[Assigned For All Purposes To The Honorable 

Phyllis J. Hamilton] 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION DIRECTING 

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Order Directing Entry of Judgment Pursuant 

to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or in the Alternative, an Order Certifying 

Grounds for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1292(B); 

 WHEREAS, the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion is currently set for July 11, 2007 (“Hearing 

Date”); 

/ / / 

Case 4:05-cv-04656-PJH Document 128 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 3
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA1 60146386.1 - 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

HEARING DATE

Case No. C 05-4656 PJH

 WHEREAS, the parties are currently engaged in settlement discussions; 

 WHEREAS, the parties agree that a short continuance of the Hearing Date would assist 

them in evaluating settlement: 

 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, subject to Court approval, that the Hearing Date 

should be continued for 28 days, until Wednesday, August 8, 2007, or any other subsequent 

hearing date that is convenient for the Court. 

DATED: June 19, 2007 BRADSHAW & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

By: /S/ Drexel Bradshaw _

Drexel Bradshaw 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Identity Arts, LLC 

DATED: June 19, 2007 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 

By: /S/ David Martinez ___

David Martinez 

Attorneys for Defendants Best Buy 

Enterprise Services, Inc. and Best Buy Co., 

Inc. 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. 

 Executed this 19th Day of June, at Los Angeles, California. 

 /S/ David Martinez 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. 

 Executed this 19th Day of June, at San Francisco, California. 

 /S/ Drexel A. Bradshaw 

Case 4:05-cv-04656-PJH Document 128 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 3
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA1 60146386.1 - 3 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

HEARING DATE

Case No. C 05-4656 PJH

 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Order Directing Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, or in the Alternative, an Order Certifying Grounds for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. section 1292(B) is hereby continued to August 8, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. 

DATED: __________________________ ___________________________________ 

 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, 

 United States District Judge 

6/27/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:05-cv-04656-PJH Document 128 Filed 06/27/07 Page 3 of 3