Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05733/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05733-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEX GULDBECK and KIMBERLY A

ANDERSON,

Plaintiffs,

v

CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC; FIRST

AMERICAN LOANSTAR TRUSTEE

SERVICES, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC; VORHEES

VENTURES INC and DOES 1-100,

Defendants. /

No C 09-5733 VRW

ORDER

On March 31, 2010, the court ordered the parties to show

cause why the action should not be remanded to San Mateo County

superior court, as the amended complaint contains no federal

claims. Doc #32. The deadline to respond to the court’s order has

passed, and no party has objected to the proposed remand. See Doc

##33, 36.

Because all federal claims have been dismissed, remand is

appropriate. 28 USC § 1367(c)(3); see also Wren v Sletten

Construction Co, 654 F2d 529, 536 (9th Cir 1981) (“When the state

Case 3:09-cv-05733-VRW Document 37 Filed 04/17/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

issues apparently predominate and all federal claims are dismissed

before trial, the proper exercise of discretion requires dismissal

of the state claims.”). Accordingly, the action is hereby REMANDED

to San Mateo County superior court. The clerk is directed to

terminate all motions and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05733-VRW Document 37 Filed 04/17/10 Page 2 of 2