Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228-38/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

Case No.13-cv-00228-RMW

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

s

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADIL HIRAMANEK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

L. MICHAEL CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-00228-RMW

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER

(Re: Docket Nos. 272, 311)

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), the court finds that Defendants’ motion for a protective order1

is suitable for determination without oral argument. Accordingly, the court takes the hearing for 

the motion off the court’s calendar. The deadline for Plaintiff Adil Hiramanek to file any

opposition to Defendant’s motion remains 6:00 PM on October 9, 2015, as set by the court’s 

previous order granting Hiramanek’s ex parte motion to enlarge time.

2

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 9, 2015

_________________________________

PAUL S. GREWAL

United States Magistrate Judge

 

1

See Docket No. 272.

2

See Docket No. 301.

Case 3:13-cv-00228-JD Document 312 Filed 10/09/15 Page 1 of 1