Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01985/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01985-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CASE NO. C 04-1985 HRL

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

JESSICA A. DAYTON (State Bar #231698)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JAREK MOLSKI 

and DISABILITY RIGHTS 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION 

SERVICES: HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK MOLSKI, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING

YOU HELP OTHERS, a California public

benefit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LA ROCHELLE; DANIEL P.

MIRASSOU, JAMES L. MIRASSOU and

PETER M. MIRASSOU, dba LA

ROCHELLE, 

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 04-1985 HRL

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of

this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms

of the Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own

costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511

U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of

settlement agreements).

Case 5:04-cv-01985-HRL Document 31 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CASE NO. C 04-1985 HRL 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

DATED: July 26, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: _____/s/_______________________________

Jessica A. Dayton

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS

DATED: July 26, 2005 SCHAFFER, LAX, McNAUGHTON & CHEN

By: ______/s/_____________________________

Russell A. Franklin

Attorneys for Defendants defendants DANIEL P.

MIRASSOU, JAMES L. MIRASSOU and PETER

M. MIRASSOU, dba LA ROCHELLE

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: _____________, 2005

 

Hon. Howard R. Lloyd

UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:04-cv-01985-HRL Document 31 Filed 07/29/05 Page 2 of 2