Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-76/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -1- Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO FILE CORRECTED EXHIBITS

Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129 ) 

kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

 OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 

Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 

Tel. (650) 801-5000 Fax: (650) 801-5100 

Edward J. DeFranco (Bar No. 165596) 

eddefranco@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

 OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor 

New York, New York 

Tel. (212) 849-7000 Fax: (212) 849-7100 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MEDIATEK, INC., and Defendants OPPO 

DIGITAL, INC., and MSI COMPUTER CORP. 

Mark Malin (199757) 

mmalin@deweyballantine.com 

DEWEY BALLANTINE LLP 

1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 

E. Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Telephone: (650) 845-7303 

Facsimile: (650) 845-7333 

Shamita D. Etienne-Cummings (202090) 

setienne@mwe.com 

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: (650) 813-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 813-5100 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim 

Defendant Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., 

Ltd. and Counterclaim Defendant Panasonic 

Corporation of North America. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

MEDIATEK, INC., OPPO DIGITAL, INC., 

and MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL 

COMPUTER CORP., 

Defendants.

MEDIATEK, INC., 

Counterclaimant, 

vs.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD. and PANASONIC 

CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, 

Counterdefendants.

 CASE NO. 05-CV-3148-MMC 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO FILE CORRECTED 

EXHIBITS, INCLUDING EXHIBITS 

UNDER SEAL

Judge: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1011 Filed 05/08/07 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -2- Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO FILE CORRECTED EXHIBITS

WHEREAS, the parties filed summary judgment motion papers in this action on April 6, 

2007, and corresponding opposition papers on April 20, 2007, 

WHEREAS, in support of their summary judgment briefs, Defendants cited to deposition 

transcripts and filed the cited pages of those transcripts as exhibits, 

WHEREAS, due to an oversight, Defendants inadvertently filed Exhibit 30 to the 

Declaration of Brian Cannon in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket 

No. 765) without certain pages cited in the brief, 

WHEREAS, due to an oversight, Defendants filed Exhibit 9 (Docket No. 662) to the 

Declaration of Steven Wasserman in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment citing 

to a draft deposition transcript, rather than the final transcript, 

WHEREAS, due to clerical errors, Defendants filed the following exhibits, which are 

excerpts of deposition transcripts, without certain pages cited in the briefs: 

(i) Exhibits 2 and 4 to the Declaration of Brian Cannon in Support of Defendants' 

Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 765), 

(ii) Exhibits 6 and 7 to the Declaration of Steven Wasserman in Support of Defendants' 

Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 681 and 752), 

(iii) Exhibits D, K and Q to the Declaration of Charlie Y. Chou in Support of 

Defendants' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 718), 

WHEREAS, due to clerical errors, Plaintiff inadvertently filed Exhibit 54 to Declaration of 

Aldo A. Badini in Support of Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion (Docket No. 600) without 

certain pages cited in the brief, 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal on April 

6, 2007, and due to an oversight, Plaintiff incorrectly stated in Declaration of Keith Gray in 

Support of the Administrative Motion (Docket No. 617), under paragraph 4(h), that Mr. Davies 

testified "on behalf of Microsoft," which should be corrected as Mr. Davies testified "about his 

experience at Microsoft," 

WHEREAS, due to clerical errors, Plaintiff inadvertently filed the Declaration of Martin S. 

Walker in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion (Docket 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1011 Filed 05/08/07 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -3- Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO FILE CORRECTED EXHIBITS

No. 707) without Dr. Walker's signature page, which Dr. Walker had dated, signed, and sent to 

Plaintiff before the declaration was filed, 

WHEREAS, Exhibits 2 and 4 to the Declaration of Brian Cannon, Exhibits 7 and 9 to the 

Declaration of Steven Wasserman, and Exhibit D to the Declaration of Charlie Chou were filed 

with the Court under seal, 

WHEREAS, the Declaration of Martin S. Walker in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to 

Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion was filed with the Court under seal, and 

WHEREAS, for the convenience of the Court and in the interest of justice, the parties 

agree that corrected documents should be filed with the Court, 

NOW, THEREFORE, 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO, through 

their respective counsel, that pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7-11 and 7-12: 

• The Clerk shall replace the following with corrected Exhibits filed under seal: 

1) Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Brian Cannon (Docket No. 765), with 

corrected version attached hereto as Exhibit C1; 

2) Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Brian Cannon (Docket No. 765), with 

corrected version attached hereto as Exhibit C2; 

3) Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of Steven Wasserman (Docket Nos. 681 and 

752), with corrected version attached hereto as Exhibit C3; 

4) Exhibit 9 (Docket No. 662) to the Declaration of Steven Wasserman, with 

corrected version attached hereto as Exhibit C4; 

5) Exhibit D to the Declaration of Charlie Chou (Docket No. 718), with 

corrected version attached hereto as Exhibit C5; 

6) Declaration of Martin S. Walker in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to 

Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion (Docket No. 707), with corrected 

version attached hereto as Exhibit C6.

• The Clerk shall replace the following with corrected exhibits filed in the public 

record: 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1011 Filed 05/08/07 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -4- Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO FILE CORRECTED EXHIBITS

1) Exhibit 30 to the Declaration of Brian Cannon in Support of Defendants' 

Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 765), with corrected version 

attached hereto as Exhibit C7; 

2) Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Steven Wasserman in Support of Defendants' 

Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 681 and 752), with corrected 

version attached hereto as Exhibit C8; 

3) Exhibit K to the Declaration of Charlie Y. Chou in Support of Defendants' 

Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 718), with 

corrected version attached hereto as Exhibit C9; 

4) Exhibit Q to the Declaration of Charlie Y. Chou in Support of Defendants' 

Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 718), with 

corrected version attached hereto as Exhibit C10; 

5) Exhibit 54 to Declaration of Aldo A. Badini in Support of Plaintiff's 

Summary Judgment Motion (Docket No. 600), with corrected version 

attached hereto as Exhibit C11; 

6) Declaration of Keith Gray in Support of Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to 

File Documents Under Seal (Docket No. 617), with corrected version 

attached hereto as Exhibit C12; 

7) Declaration of Martin S. Walker in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to 

Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion (Redacted Public Version) (Docket 

No. 707), with corrected version attached hereto as Exhibit C13. 

DATED: May 4, 2007 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

 By /s/ 

 Eric Huang 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimant 

MEDIATEK, INC., OPPO DIGITAL, INC., and 

MSI COMPUTER CORP 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1011 Filed 05/08/07 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -5- Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO FILE CORRECTED EXHIBITS

DATED: May 4, 2007 DEWEY BALLANTINE LLP 

 By /s/ 

 Vinh Pham 

Attorney for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., 

LTD. and Counterclaim Defendant PANASONIC 

CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA 

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from Vinh 

Pham. 

DATED: May 4, 2007 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

 By /s/ 

 Eric Huang 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________________ ___________________________________________ 

 Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

 United States District Judge

(1) the Clerk shall file under seal Exs. C1-C6

to the Joint Stipulation, and (2) Exs. C7-C13 to the Joint Stipulation are deemed to be corrected

versions of the exhibits identified on page 4 of the Joint Stipulation.

May 8, 2007

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1011 Filed 05/08/07 Page 5 of 5