Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00582/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00582-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Rachan Banchong,

Petitioner, 

vs.

Katrina Kane,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 09-582-PHX-MHM

ORDER

Petitioner, Rachan Banchong, filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on March

23, 2009. On January 15, 2010, Respondent filed a Suggestion of Mootness advising the

Court that Petitioner was deported on October 27, 2009. 

The Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation on December 23, 2009

recommending that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed. 

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court notes that the Petitioner's copy of the Report and Recommendation has been

returned by the post-office with the notation "Released/Not in Custody." Failure to timely

file objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge may be

Case 2:09-cv-00582-MHM Document 20 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

considered a waiver of a party’s right to de novo consideration of the issues. See United

States v. Reyna-Tapia 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

After a complete and independent review of the issues presented, the Court finds itself

in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court [Doc. 17]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed

[Doc. 1]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Petitioner's Motion for Stay of

Removal [Doc. 16]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying a certificate of appealability. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 18th day of May, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-00582-MHM Document 20 Filed 05/20/10 Page 2 of 2