Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00060/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00060-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FA’AFOUINA AFATO, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-10-0060 FCD EFB 

vs.

HILLARY CLINTON, et al.,

ORDER

Defendants. 

 /

Currently noticed for hearing before the undersigned on May 19, 2010 is plaintiffs’

motion to compel defendants to produce administrative records. Dckt. No. 18. In light of

defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, which

is currently noticed for hearing before the assigned district judge on May 21, 2010, the motion to

compel will be denied without prejudice. If plaintiffs’ motion to compel is related to the motion

to dismiss, it may “be served and filed in the manner and on the date prescribed for the filing of

opposition” to the motion to dismiss, as contemplated in Local Rule 230(e). If the motion to

compel is unrelated to the motion to dismiss, plaintiff may re-notice the motion after the

assigned district judge issues a ruling on defendants’ motion to dismiss. 

////

////

Case 2:10-cv-00060-MCE-EFB Document 20 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs’ motion to compel, Dckt. No. 18, is denied without prejudice and the

hearing thereon is vacated; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion to appear at the hearing telephonically, Dckt. No. 19, is denied as

moot.

DATED: May 4, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-00060-MCE-EFB Document 20 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 2