Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00986/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00986-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re SOLECTRON CORPORATION 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Master File No. C-03-0986-CRB 

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAN 

OF ALLOCATION OF SETTLEMENT 

PROCEEDS 

DATE: March 3, 2006 

TIME: 10:00 a.m. 

COURTROOM: The Honorable 

Charles R. Breyer 

Case 3:03-cv-00986-CRB Document 153 Filed 03/03/06 Page 1 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS 

 - C-03-0986-CRB - 1 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Lead Plaintiffs’ application for approval of 

the Plan of Allocation of the net settlement proceeds in the above-captioned action; the Court having 

considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed in the 

premises; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 

1. For purposes of this Order, the terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set 

forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of November 11, 2005 (the “Stipulation”). 

2. Pursuant to and in full compliance with Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, this Court hereby finds and concludes that due and adequate notice was directed to all 

Persons and entities who are Class Members advising them of the Plan of Allocation and of their 

right to object thereto, and a full and fair opportunity was accorded to all Persons and entities who 

are Class Members to be heard with respect to the Plan of Allocation. 

3. The Court hereby finds and concludes that the formula for the calculation of the 

claims of Authorized Claimants which is set forth in the Notice of Pendency and Proposed 

Settlement of Class Action (the “Notice”) sent to Class Members, provides a fair and reasonable 

basis upon which to allocate the proceeds of the Net Settlement Fund established by the Stipulation 

among Class Members, with due consideration having been given to administrative convenience and 

necessity. 

Case 3:03-cv-00986-CRB Document 153 Filed 03/03/06 Page 2 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS 

 - C-03-0986-CRB - 2 -

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4. The Court hereby finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation set forth in the 

Notice is in all respects fair and reasonable and the Court hereby approves the Plan of Allocation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _____________________ 

 THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 Submitted by: 

GREEN WELLING LLP 

ROBERT S. GREEN 

235 Pine Street, 15th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: 415/477-6700 

415/477-6710 (fax) 

Liaison Counsel 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

SAMUEL H. RUDMAN 

DAVID A. ROSENFELD 

58 South Service Road, Suite 200 

Melville, NY 11747 

Telephone: 631/367-7100 

631/367-1173 (fax) 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

JOY ANN BULL 

s/ JOY ANN BULL 

JOY ANN BULL 

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: 619/231-1058 

619/231-7423 (fax) 

March 03, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:03-cv-00986-CRB Document 153 Filed 03/03/06 Page 3 of 3