Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00006/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00006-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW D. HORN, ) 

 )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

WARDEN BERNIE ELLIS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

____________________________________)

1:06-cv-00006-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 22)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS (Doc. 19)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On July 19, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending that Respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction be

granted and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. (Doc. 22). This Findings and

Case 1:06-cv-00006-LJO -TAG Document 23 Filed 08/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely

objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed July 19, 2007 (Doc. 22), is ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Doc. 19), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 8, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00006-LJO -TAG Document 23 Filed 08/08/07 Page 2 of 2