Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02349/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02349-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2349 FCD JFM P

vs.

L. JOHNSON-DOVEY,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

In an order filed December 6, 2005, this court found that plaintiff has, on at least

four occasions, suffered dismissals of lawsuits filed in this district on the grounds that said

actions were frivolous or malicious or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,

and that plaintiff had not in this action alleged facts which suggest that he is under imminent

danger of serious physical injury. For those reasons, the court further found, in accordance with

the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), plaintiff was precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis

with this action. The court therefore denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and

directed plaintiff to pay the $250.00 filing fee for this action. In addition, the court cautioned

plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed. 

/////

Case 2:05-cv-02349-FCD-JFM Document 7 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On December 21, 2005, plaintiff filed a statement in response to the court’s

December 6, 2005 order. Nothing in plaintiff’s statement alters the findings made in the court’s

December 6, 2005 order, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee as required by that order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 3, 2006. 

/camp2349.fpf

Case 2:05-cv-02349-FCD-JFM Document 7 Filed 01/04/06 Page 2 of 2