Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_06-cv-02653/USCOURTS-azd-3_06-cv-02653-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Carl Philip Schaede, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al. 

 Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV06-2653-PCT-SRB

ORDER

Petitioner filed a counseled Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 on November 6, 2006. On February 9, 2007, Respondents filed a Motion to Dismiss

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. On February 22,

2007, Petitioner's counsel filed a Response to the Motion to Dismiss and a Request for Delay

of Ruling. No response to the Request for Delay of Ruling and no reply to the Motion to

Dismiss were filed. On March 14, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and

Recommendation recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and

dismissed.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Case 3:06-cv-02653-SRB Document 19 Filed 04/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court. (doc. 17).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied

and dismissed. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 11th day of April, 2007.

Case 3:06-cv-02653-SRB Document 19 Filed 04/11/07 Page 2 of 2