Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02656/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02656-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID M. TUTTELMAN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF SAN JOSE, SAN JOSE POLICE

DEPARTMENT, SAN JOSE POLICE

OFFICER ANTHONY LUISI, SAN JOSE

POLICE OFFICER RONALD BAYS,

Defendants. /

No. C 02-02656 WHA

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’

SPECIFIC ITEMS OF CLAIMED

COSTS

After a jury verdict in defendants’ favor, plaintiff Tuttelman has filed objections to

defendants’ bill of costs. Defendants filed their bill of costs on November 17, 2006. It was

simultaneously served on plaintiff’s counsel through the court’s e-filing system. Civil Local

Rule 54-2(a) states that the time for filing objections is “[w]ithin 10 days after service by any

party of its bill of costs.” Plaintiff’s objections were filed on February 7, 2007, almost three

months after the bill of costs was filed. Finding no good cause for the late filing, this order

STRIKES plaintiff’s objections.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:02-cv-02656-WHA Document 420 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 1