Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02622/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02622-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LILLIANA SANCHEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CAPITAL CONTRACTORS INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 14-2622 MMC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

COUNSELS’ MOTION TO WITHDRAW;

VACATING HEARING; DIRECTIONS TO

CLERK; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES;

ADVANCING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

Before the Court is the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record, jointly filed March

26, 2015, by Corey, Luzaich, de Ghetaldi, Nastari & Riddle, LLP, the Law Offices of Parviz

Darabi, and Alvarenga Law, by which said counsel seek to be relieved as counsel of record

for plaintiffs. Each of the eight plaintiffs has provided written consent to the withdrawal (see

Riddle Decl. Ex. B), and defendant Capital Contractors Inc. (“Capital”) has filed a statement

of non-opposition. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in

response to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for decision thereon,

VACATES the hearing scheduled for May 1, 2015, and, good cause appearing, hereby

GRANTS the motion.

//

//

//

Case 3:14-cv-02622-MMC Document 81 Filed 04/22/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Each plaintiff is hereby ADVISED to obtain from the Clerk of the Court a copy of the

Civil Local Rules for the Northern District of California. Alternatively, the Civil Local Rules

are available on the District Court’s website, specifically, http://cand.uscourts.gov/home.

2

At the Case Management Conference, the Court, inter alia, will set a deadline for

Capital to respond to the First Amended Complaint.

2

In light of the Court’s having granted the instant motion, plaintiffs now proceed pro

se, and, and, accordingly, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to amend the docket to include

the following contact information for plaintiffs:

Lilliana Sanchez Yolanda Camey

483 Massar Avenue 932 Ellsworth Street

San Jose CA 95116 San Francisco, CA 94110

Juan Carlos Ramirez Jose Antonio Hernandez

2758 Chopin Avenue 845 Visitacion Avenue

San Jose CA 95122 San Francisco CA 94134

Juan Carlos Hernandez Jose Alfaro

3683 Mission Street #4 3035 Avon Lane

San Francisco CA 94110 San Pablo CA 94806

Irma Gonzalez Aguilar Lucina Galindo

37 Harbor Drive 483 Massar Avenue

Bay Point CA 94565 San Jose CA 95116

Capital is hereby DIRECTED to continue to electronically file all documents. 

Additionally, Capital is hereby DIRECTED to serve on each plaintiff at his/her above-listed

address, either by mail or by personal delivery, all documents it files. 

Each plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to submit all documents for filing in paper form,

specifically by mailing or otherwise delivering to the Clerk of the District Court, 450 Golden

Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, San Francisco CA 94102, an original document along with a

chambers copy of any original document, such copy clearly marked “Chambers Copy.” 

Additionally, each plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to serve counsel for Capital with a copy of

any document he or she files with the Clerk, and to file proof of such service. See Civil

L.R. 5-5(a).1

Lastly, the Court hereby ADVANCES the Case Management Conference from

March 4, 2016, to May 22, 2015, at 10:30 a.m., in Courtroom 7, 450 Golden Gate Avenue,

19th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94102.2 A Joint Case Management Statement shall be

Case 3:14-cv-02622-MMC Document 81 Filed 04/22/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

The Court recognizes that, in the absence of counsel for plaintiffs, a joint statement

may be difficult to prepare. One potential approach would be for Capital’s counsel to draft

a proposed statement and send it to the individual plaintiffs for their respective objections, if

any, and any suggested additional content.

3

filed no later than May 15, 2015.3 Each plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to appear in person,

unless counsel has previously filed a notice of appearance on behalf of that plaintiff. 

Failure to appear may result in the imposition of sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 22, 2015 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-02622-MMC Document 81 Filed 04/22/15 Page 3 of 3