Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06660/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06660-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

{2176517.DOC;} 1 

Stipulation Extending Page Limit for 1) CRA’s MPA in 

Support of Preliminary Injunction; and 2) City of 

Emeryville’s Opposition; Proposed Order 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin law corporation

Charles L. Post, State Bar No. 160443 

Lukas J. Clary, State Bar No. 251519 

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin 

LAW CORPORATION 

400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: 916/558-6000 

Facsimile: 916/446-1611 

Email: cpost@weintraub.com

lclary@weintraub.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

California Restaurant Association 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT 

ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual 

benefit corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITY OF EMERYVILLE, a California 

municipal corporation, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:16-cv-06660-JST 

STIPULATION EXTENDING THE PAGE 

LIMITS FOR: (1) CALIFORNIA 

RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION’S 

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 

AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION; AND (2) CITY OF 

EMERYVILLE’S OPPOSITION TO 

CRA’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION; PROPOSED ORDER 

 Plaintiff California Restaurant Association (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant City of Emeryville 

(“Defendant”) (collectively “the Parties”) hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff may file a 

Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction in excess 

of the twenty-five (25) page limitation set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), but not to exceed forty 

(40) pages in length. Plaintiff and Defendant hereby further stipulate and agree that Defendant 

may file a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary 

Injunction in excess of the twenty-five (25) page limitation set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), 

but not to exceed thirty-five (35) pages in length. This Stipulation is made pursuant to Rules 7-11 and 

Case 3:16-cv-06660-JST Document 13 Filed 01/10/17 Page 1 of 3
{2176517.DOC;} 2 

Stipulation Extending Page Limit for 1) CRA’s MPA in 

Support of Preliminary Injunction; and 2) City of 

Emeryville’s Opposition; Proposed Order 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin law corporation

7-12 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 

 There is good cause for the Stipulation to extend the page limit given that this case 

involves several independent causes of action, each of which involves numerous complex and 

novel legal issues. Each cause of action invokes constitutional challenges, including challenges 

under the First (Free Speech), Fifth (Takings), and Fourteenth (Equal Protection) Amendments 

and Article VI, Clause 2 (Supremacy) of the United States Constitution, along with similar claims 

invoking the California Constitution. Thus, more than 25 pages are needed for the moving and 

opposition papers to fully address each cause of action. 

 The parties also hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Defendant’s 

responsive pleading to January 31 pursuant to Local Rule 6-1. 

Finally, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to attempt to reserve March 9 as the hearing 

date for Plaintiff’s Preliminary Injunction and for Defendant’s anticipated Motion to Dismiss. The 

parties also stipulate to the following briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s Preliminary Injunction and 

for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss: 

Opening Briefs: January 31, 2017 

Opposition Briefs: February 14, 2017 

Reply Briefs: February 21, 2017 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 10, 2017 weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin 

 law corporation 

 By: /s/ Lukas J. Clary 

 Lukas J. Clary 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 California Restaurant Association 

Dated: January 10, 2017 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP 

 By: /s/ J. Leah Castella 

 J. Leah Castella 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 City of Emeryville 

Case 3:16-cv-06660-JST Document 13 Filed 01/10/17 Page 2 of 3
{2176517.DOC;} 3 

Stipulation Extending Page Limit for 1) CRA’s MPA in 

Support of Preliminary Injunction; and 2) City of 

Emeryville’s Opposition; Proposed Order 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin law corporation

PROPOSED ORDER 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Extra Pages pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation is granted. Plaintiff 

may file a memorandum of points and authorities up to 35 pages in support of its motion for 

preliminary injunction. Defendant may file a memorandum of points and authorities up to 35 

pages in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. 

Dated: __________________ ____________________________________ 

 Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

January 10, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-06660-JST Document 13 Filed 01/10/17 Page 3 of 3