Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04596/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04596-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST 

TO FILE AND SERVE REPLIES 

(CASE NO. C06-04596 JW)

[Counsel List on Signature Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

MACROVISION CORPORATION,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C06-04596 JW

(consolidated with Case Nos. C06-04660 and 

C06-04659)

STIPULATION AND JOINT

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO

ENLARGE TIME TO FILE REPLIES

MACROVISION CORPORATION,

Counter-Plaintiff,

v.

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 

CORPORATION,

Counter-Defendant.

Both Intertrust Technologies Corporation (“Intertrust”) and Macrovision Corporation 

(“Macrovision”) have filed motions that are scheduled to be heard by this Court on June 11, 2007. 

Intertrust has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Inequitable Conduct (Docket No. 79). 

Macrovision has filed two motions in limine: a Renewed Motion in Limine to Preclude 

Consideration of Certain Issues (Docket No. 73) and a Motion in Limine to Preclude Intertrust from 

Arguing That the Board Did Not Have Authority to Decide the Priority Issue in the ‘142 Interference 

After Having Decided the Inequitable Conduct Issue (Docket No. 77). 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3, the parties’ replies must be served and filed not less than 14 days 

before the hearing date, i.e., Monday, May 28, 2007 (Memorial Day), or applying Fed. R. Civ. P. 

6(a) by Friday, May 25, 2007. Pursuant to Civil L. R. 6-2 and 7-12, the parties hereby stipulate that 

replies by both parties shall be filed and served no later than May 29, 2007.

Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 84 Filed 05/11/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST 

TO FILE AND SERVE REPLIES 

(CASE NO. C06-04596 JW))

The requested time modification will have no effect on the schedule for this case, as the 

parties are not requesting that the hearing date be changed.

Previous time modifications in this case are as follows: 

1. The Case Management Conference (“CMC”) originally scheduled for November 27, 

2006, was continued to December 4, 2006, by Intertrust’s Motion for Administrative 

Relief. See Docket No. 30.

2. The CMC originally scheduled for January 16, 2007, and the hearing date for Intertrust’s 

Motion to Bifurcate originally scheduled for February 26, 2007, were consolidated on 

February 23, 2007, to coincide with the tutorial. See Docket Nos. 48, 55, 58.

3. The hearing date for Macrovision’s current Motions in Limine was changed from June 4, 

2007, to the current date of June 11, 2007, by Clerk’s Notice. See Docket No. 78.

By her signature below, counsel for Intertrust attests that counsel for Macrovision concur in 

the filing of this stipulation.

DATED: May 10, 2007 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT 

& DUNNER, LLP

By / s /

Linda J. Thayer (Bar No. 195,115)

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Linda J. Thayer

linda.thayer@finnegan.com

Stanford Research Park

3300 Hillview Avenue

Palo Alto, California 94304-1203

Telephone: (650) 849-6600

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666

Barbara C. McCurdy (Admitted Pro HacVice)

barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com

901 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001

Telephone: (202) 408-4000

Facsimile: (202) 408-4400

Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 84 Filed 05/11/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST 

TO FILE AND SERVE REPLIES 

(CASE NO. C06-04596 JW))

DATED: May 10, 2007 OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER &

NEUSTADT, P.C.

By / s /

Charles L. Gholz

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff 

MACROVISION CORP.

Charles L. Gholz (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

cgholz@oblon.com

W. Todd Baker (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

tbaker@oblon.com

Frank J. West (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

fwest@oblon.com

1940 Duke Street

Alexandria, VA 22314

Telephone: 703-413-3000

Facsimile: 703-413-2220

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER &

HEDGES, LLP

Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737)

claudestern@quinnemanuel.com

Michael D. Powell (Bar No. 202850)

mikepowell@quinnemanuel.com

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560

Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139

Telephone: (650) 801-5000

Facsimile: (650) 801-5100

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Both parties shall have until May 29, 2007, to file and serve replies.

Dated: __________________________ ____________________________________________

James Ware

United States District Judge 

May 11 2007

Case 5:06-cv-04596-JW Document 84 Filed 05/11/07 Page 3 of 3