Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02405/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02405-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 45:51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act

---

Stipulation and Proposed Order 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE CROW LAW FIRM, P.C. 

DONALD S. BRITT, ESQ. (SBN 44901) 

700 E Street 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 441-2980 

Facsimile: (916) 441-3846 

Attorneys for Plaintiff DARYL STINCHFIELD 

MICHAEL JOHNSON, ESQ. (SBN 88884) 

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 

Law Department 

10031 Foothills Blvd, Suite 200 

Roseville, CA 95747 

General: 916-789-6400 

Direct: 916-789-6231 

Fax: 916-789-6227 

Attorney for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARYL STINCHFIELD, Case No. 2:06-CV-2405 DFL DAD 

Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND 

 ORDER PERMITTING FILING OF 

v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

 

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., 

 

Defendants / 

Plaintiff DARYL STINCHFIELD and Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 

COMPANY, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 

Material changes have occurred in Plaintiff’s employment situation since the filing of the 

Complaint which could not have been alleged at the time Plaintiff filed his Complaint. Under the 

existing standards for amendment and supplemental pleadings as set forth in Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 15, good cause exists to permit Plaintiff to file the proposed First Amended Complaint 

Case 2:06-cv-02405-DFL-DAD Document 21 Filed 02/20/07 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation and Proposed Order 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Defendant shall serve an answer to the First Amended Complaint 

within the time prescribed by law. 

Dated: February 19, 2007 THE CROW LAW FIRM, P.C. 

 

/s/ Donald S. Britt 

 By: _______________________________ 

 DONALD S. BRITT 

 Attorney for Daryl M. Stinchfield 

Dated: February 9, 2007 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 

 

/s/ Michael Johnson 

 By:___________________________________ 

 MICHAEL JOHNSON 

 Attorney for Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. 

**** 

For GOOD CAUSE shown, the Parties’ Stipulation is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file 

and serve the Proposed First Amended Complaint on or before February 28, 2007. Defendant shall 

file an Answer thereto within the time prescribed by law. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 16, 2007 

 /s/ David F. Levi___________________

 DAVID F. LEVI, 

 Judge of the United States District Court 

Case 2:06-cv-02405-DFL-DAD Document 21 Filed 02/20/07 Page 2 of 2