Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01350/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01350-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUSSELL MCCLOULD,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-1350 LKK DAD P

vs.

KUMA J. DEBOO, Warden, 

 Respondent. ORDER

 /

On August 13, 2007, this court ordered respondent to respond to petitioner’s

application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After granting respondent a

one-week extension time, respondent filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the action was

moot. After learning that the factual predicate of the motion was inaccurate, respondent filed a

request to withdraw the motion. In addition, respondent requested that the court accept as an

answer a brief that respondent submitted to the Ninth Circuit in a separate case, Rodriguez v.

Smith, C.A. No. 07-16014. Respondent attached a copy of the brief as Exhibit 2 to the motion to

dismiss respondent now seeks to withdraw.

Good cause appearing, the court will grant respondent’s request to withdraw the

pending motion to dismiss, and the motion will be stricken. However, the court will deny

respondent’s request to accept a brief from an entirely different case as respondent’s answer in

Case 2:07-cv-01350-LKK -DAD Document 10 Filed 10/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

this case. The court will grant respondent 30 days leave to file an answer to petitioner’s

application in this action. Petitioner's reply, if any, will be due within thirty days after service of

the answer.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent’s request to withdraw the September 18, 2007 motion to dismiss is

granted, and the motion is hereby stricken;

2. Respondent’s request that the court accept a brief from Rodriguez v. Smith,

C.A. No. 07-16014 as respondent’s answer in this case is denied; and

3. Respondent is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file an answer to

petitioner’s application in this action. Petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within

thirty days after service of the answer.

DATED: October 11, 2007.

DAD:9

mccl1350.ans

Case 2:07-cv-01350-LKK -DAD Document 10 Filed 10/11/07 Page 2 of 2