Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01424/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01424-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Robert Riley is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On January 27, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that 

Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 16.) The Court’s screening order 

provided Plaintiff with the legal standards that applied to his claims and granted Plaintiff leave to file a 

first amended complaint within thirty days after service of the order. (Id.)

However, Plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint and the time in which to do so 

has passed.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that, within fourteen (14) days from the date of 

service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why the instant action should not be 

dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s January 27, 2020 screening order, failure to 

ROBERT RILEY,

 Plaintiff,

v.

GODWIN UGWUEZE, et.al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:19-cv-01424-DAD-SAB (PC)

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE 

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT 

ORDER 

Case 1:19-cv-01424-DAD-SAB Document 19 Filed 03/09/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

prosecute, and failure to state a claim for relief. Plaintiff can comply with this order to show cause by 

filing a second amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s January 27, 2020 screening order. 

Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to a district 

judge that the instant action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to obey a court order, and 

failure to state a cognizable claim for relief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2020 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-01424-DAD-SAB Document 19 Filed 03/09/20 Page 2 of 2