Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00226/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00226-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS R. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

KELLY HARRINGTON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:12-cv-00226 LJO DLB PC

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE 

REQUESTING CLARIFICATION OF 

MODIFIED SCHEDULING ORDER

[ECF No. 82]

Plaintiff Marcus R. Williams is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 

civil rights action. 

On January 21, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for status conference requesting 

clarification of the modified scheduling order. Plaintiff seeks clarification of the scheduling 

order in light of alleged outstanding discovery requests. As stated in the Court’s orders issued on 

October 5, 2015, and January 21, 2016, discovery is closed. The Court resolved the last 

remaining discovery issues on July 17, 2015, and lifted the stay on October 5, 2015. Plaintiff’s 

requests for additional time to conduct discovery on November 9, 2015, and December 28, 2015, 

were denied as untimely. At this time, Defendants’ supplemental motion for summary judgment 

is due on February 16, 2016. Pursuant to the Court’s order of October 5, 2015, Plaintiff may file 

an opposition within thirty days after the date of service of Defendants’ supplemental motion for 

Case 1:12-cv-00226-LJO-EPG Document 83 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

summary judgment, and Defendants may file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition within fourteen 

days from the date of service of Plaintiff’s opposition. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for status conference for 

clarification of the modified scheduling order is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2016 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00226-LJO-EPG Document 83 Filed 01/26/16 Page 2 of 2