Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01230/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01230-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

________________________________

Erik L. Lund, Esq. Bar No. 212835

FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN

A Professional Corporation

1631 East 18th Street

Santa Ana, California 92705-7101

(714) 953-5300

(714) 953-1143 FAX

Elund@law4cops.com

Attorneys for Defendants City of Palo Alto and Officer Brad Kilpatrick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMEEL DOUGLAS, a minor, by and

through his Guardian Ad Litem,

DONETTE DOUGLAS,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF PALO ALTO, a government

entity, BRAD KILPATRICK, an

individual, and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

_________________________________

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. C05-01230 RMW HRL

STIPULATION &

ORDER OF

DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE [FED. R. CIV. P.

41(A)]

Case 5:05-cv-01230-RMW Document 17 Filed 05/18/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

________________________________

-2-

STIPULATION

1. Plaintiff Jameel Douglas, through his guardian ad litem, Donette

Douglas and all Defendants (The City of Palo Alto and Brad Kilpatrick)

hereby jointly request and stipulate under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) that this case

be dismissed with prejudice.

2. Each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. All parties

waive any and all claims for costs and/or fees that they might possess against

any other party.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

DATED: April 18, 2006 FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN

A Professional Corporation

 /s/ErikL. Lund 

Erik L. Lund,

Attorneys for Defendants

DATED: April 18, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY

BOSKOVICH

 /s/Anthony M. Boskovich 

Anthony M. Boskovich, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ORDER

This case, No. C05-01230 RMW HRL, is dismissed with prejudice. 

Each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

IT SO ORDERED, 

DATED:

______________________________

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01230-RMW Document 17 Filed 05/18/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

________________________________

-7-

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE

I, Cathy Sherman, am employed in the aforesaid County, State of

California; I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action. 

My business address is 1631 East 18th Street, Santa Ana, California 92705-

7101.

On April 18, 2006, I served the foregoing STIPULATION &

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FED. R.

CIV. P. 41(A)] on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy

thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows:

Tony Boskvick, Esq.

28 N. 1st Street

San Jose, CA 95113

XXX (By e-filing) The above noted individuals are registered with the Court

to receive notice of electronically filed documents. Per ECF rules, hard

copies must be served only on parties who are not set up for electronic

notification.

XXX (Federal) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true

and correct, and that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar

of this Court at whose direction the service was made.

Executed on April 18, 2006, at Santa Ana, California.

 /s/Cathy Sherman 

Cathy Sherman

Case 5:05-cv-01230-RMW Document 17 Filed 05/18/06 Page 3 of 3