Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_04-cv-00029/USCOURTS-almd-2_04-cv-00029-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

RISOLETA M. KUBEK, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:04cv29-MHT

) (WO)

NORA KUBEK JONES, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

 ORDER

In an order dated March 31, 2009, this court denied

summary judgment to plaintiff Risoleta M. Kubek (Doc. No.

134). For the reasons given in that order, the court is

now of the opinion that summary judgment in favor of

defendant Nora Kubek Jones may be appropriate. See Fed.

R. Civ. P. 56(f) (“Judgment Independent of the Motion.

After giving notice and a reasonable time to respond, the

court may: (1) grant summary judgment for a nonmovant;

(2) grant the motion on grounds not raised by a party; or

(3) consider summary judgment on its own after

identifying for the parties material facts that may not

be genuinely in dispute.”). 

Case 2:04-cv-00029-MHT-WC Document 166 Filed 09/02/11 Page 1 of 2
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that plaintiff Risoleta M.

Kubek show cause, if any there be, in writing by

September 16, 2011, as to why summary judgment in favor

of defendant Nora Kubek Jones is inappropriate. 

DONE, this the 2nd day of September, 2011.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00029-MHT-WC Document 166 Filed 09/02/11 Page 2 of 2