Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-2_13-cv-00685/USCOURTS-alnd-2_13-cv-00685-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KAREN CRISS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNION SECURITY INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant.

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

}

CIVIL ACTION NO.

2:13-cv-0685-WMA

AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

OF JUNE 11, 2014

On pages 8 and 9 of the memorandum opinion and order entered

on June 11, 2014, in the section entitled “The Six-Part Test”

appears the following sentence:

Only if the court determines that the decision was de

novo correct does the court go to “step two”, or beyond. 

The word “correct” was incorrect. The word should have been

“wrong”. Accordingly, the word “wrong” is hereby SUBSTITUTED for

the word “correct” in the said sentence, and the opinion and order

is AMENDED accordingly.

DONE this 19th day of June, 2014.

_____________________________

WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

FILED

 2014 Jun-19 PM 05:02

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 2:13-cv-00685-WMA Document 30 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 1