Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00798/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00798-129/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOOP AI LABS INC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANNA GATTI, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)

ORDER ON OUTSTANDING

DISCOVERY MOTIONS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 519, 584, 607, 679, 691, 715, 

769

The following discovery motions are currently pending before the undersigned: 

Docket No. 519, Defendant Almawave USA, Inc.’s (“Almawave”) discovery letter brief 

regarding discovery from third parties Fabio Ficano and Elettranova, Inc.;

Docket No. 584, Defendant Almawave’s discovery letter brief regarding Plaintiff Loop AI 

Labs, Inc.’s alleged lack of compliance with court orders regarding its document production;

Docket No. 607, Defendant IQSystem, Inc.’s motion for leave to file a discovery letter 

brief to compel the continued deposition of Plaintiff’s witness Gianmauro Calafiore; 

Docket No. 679, Defendant Almawave’s administrative motion for leave to file a discovery 

letter brief to compel service of Plaintiff’s supplemental discovery responses;

Docket No. 691, Defendant Almawave’s administrative motion for leave to file a discovery 

letter brief for sanctions for Plaintiff’s alleged refusal to comply with the court’s May 3, 2016 

order;

Docket No. 715, Defendant Almawave’s administrative motion for leave to file a discovery 

letter brief for sanctions for Plaintiff’s alleged failure to comply with court orders to produce 

documents withheld on privilege grounds; and

Docket No. 769, Defendant Almawave’s discovery letter brief regarding the depositions of 

Plaintiff’s expert witnesses.

All of the disputes addressed in these seven motions either overlap with the conduct at 

Case 4:15-cv-00798-HSG Document 989 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

issue in the Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam’s pending Order to Show Cause, (see Docket No. 

894), or may be rendered moot by Judge Gilliam’s rulings on the outstanding motions for 

summary judgment and for sanctions. Accordingly, the motions listed above are denied without 

prejudice pending the outcome of those proceedings. If a moving party seeks to reinstate a motion

after further rulings by Judge Gilliam, it may seek leave to do so by filing a letter to the 

undersigned requesting reinstatement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 2, 2017

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:15-cv-00798-HSG Document 989 Filed 03/02/17 Page 2 of 2