Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01777/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01777-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK A. MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

JIM TILTON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:08-cv-01777-AWI-SMS-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON

WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED 

(Doc. 14.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

Plaintiff Patrick A. Martinez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on

November 20, 2008. (Doc. 1.) 

On August 12, 2009, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted and gave Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. (Doc.

9.) U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). On November 6, 2009, Plaintiff filed the First Amended

Complaint. (Doc. 14.) On November 13, 2009, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended

Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and gave Plaintiff leave to

file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty days. (Doc. 15.) On November 19, 2009, the Court

extended Plaintiff's time, granting Plaintiff thirty days from the date of service of the order in which

to file the Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 17.) U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). To date,

1

Case 1:08-cv-01777-AWI -SMS Document 18 Filed 01/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets

forth any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. 

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the undersigned

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that:

1. This action be dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state any

claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983; and

2. The Clerk be DIRECTED to close this case.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30)

days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written

objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d

1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 25, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-01777-AWI -SMS Document 18 Filed 01/25/10 Page 2 of 2