Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00697/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00697-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAY MEDINA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

EMARD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-00697-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 7)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Doc. 2)

Ray Medina (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro

se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. On

July 6, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

/

Case 1:06-cv-00697-LJO -SMS Document 18 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis. In addition,

the court notes that it appears Plaintiff’s motion is now moot

because Plaintiff has filed a change of address, indication

transfer to a new institution.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 19, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief, filed June 5,

2006, is DENIED, without prejudice, as PREMATURE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00697-LJO -SMS Document 18 Filed 09/13/06 Page 2 of 2