Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-03630/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-03630-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSE RODRIGUEZ 

CASE NO. 3:07-cv-03630 EMC 

Plaintiff(s), 

OWENS-BROCKWAY GLASS 

CONTAINER INC. 

Defendant(s). 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes: 

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

¢' Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process: 

Private ADR (please identify process and provider) 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

¢' the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

other requested deadline 

Dated: Sept.• 2007 

Dated: Sept.• 2007 

/s/ Catherine R. Douat 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

/s/Bita A. Karabian 

Attorney for Defendant 

Case 4:07-cv-03630-PJH Document 11 Filed 09/28/07 Page 1 of 2
IPROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

Non-binding Arbitration 

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 

•' Mediation 

Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session 

q¢ 90 days from the date of this order. 

other 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September__, 2007 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-03630-PJH Document 11 Filed 09/28/07 Page 2 of 2