Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01831/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01831-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GURPREET SINGH,

Plaintiff,

v.

RIO COSUMNES CORRECTION 

CENTER,

Defendant.

No. 2:24-cv-01831-DC-JDP (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

THIS ACTION

(Doc. Nos. 6, 9)

Plaintiff Gurpreet Singh is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 4, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 

recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to 

Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. (Doc. No. 9.) In particular, 

Plaintiff failed to timely file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s pending 

motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 6), and Plaintiff failed to file a response to the order to show cause 

the court issued on October 9, 2024 (Doc. No. 8). The pending findings and recommendations 

were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within 

fourteen (14) days after service. (Doc. No. 9 at 3.) To date, no objections to the findings and 

recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed.

Case 2:24-cv-01831-DC-JDP Document 11 Filed 11/25/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 4, 2024 (Doc. No. 9) are 

adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute 

this action and failure to comply with court orders; 

3. Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 6) is denied as having been 

rendered moot by this order; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 22, 2024 ___________________________

Dena Coggins

United States District Judge

Case 2:24-cv-01831-DC-JDP Document 11 Filed 11/25/24 Page 2 of 2