Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06250/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06250-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

P:\pro-se\sj.rmw\cr.07\Mullen250dis 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARTOLO MULLEN, 

Plaintiff,

 v.

ED FOULK, et al., 

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 07-6250 RMW (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the instant civil rights complaint pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983 concerning the conditions of his confinement at Napa State Hospital. 

Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. On

January 23, 2008, plaintiff filed a response to the court’s order granting leave to proceed

in forma pauperis. In his response, plaintiff states that the claims set forth in the instant

complaint are the same claims against the same defendants that he included in his second

amended complaint in his earlier civil rights action, in case no. C 03-3676 RMW (PR). 

Plaintiff explains that he filed the instant complaint before he was granted leave to file a

second amended complaint in his 2003 civil rights action. 

///

*E-FILED - 5/22/08*

Case 5:07-cv-06250-RMW Document 7 Filed 05/22/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

P:\pro-se\sj.rmw\cr.07\Mullen250dis 2

Accordingly, the instant complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice because it

contains the same claims against the same defendants as set forth in plaintiff’s pending

second amended complaint in case no. C 03-3676 RMW (PR). The clerk shall terminate

any pending motions and close the file. The court will review plaintiff’s second amended

complaint in case no. C 03-3676 RMW (PR) in a separate written order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 

 RONALD M. WHYTE

 United States District Judge

5/22/08

Case 5:07-cv-06250-RMW Document 7 Filed 05/22/08 Page 2 of 2