Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02712/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02712-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, No. CIV.S-04-2712 DAD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

MIKE H. MARK, individually

and doing business as WEI

CHINESE RESTAURANT,

Defendant.

____________________________/

This matter came before the court on September 30, 2005,

for hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Scott Johnson, proceeding pro se,

appeared on his own behalf. James Macy appeared on behalf of

defendant.

Having considered all written materials submitted in

connection with the motion, and after hearing oral argument, for the

reasons more fully explained on the record during the hearing, the

court finds that plaintiff’s complaint (see Compl. paras. 3 & 15)

Case 2:04-cv-02712-DAD Document 35 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

alleges facts sufficient to establish actual or imminent injury for

purposes of standing. See Pickern v. Holiday Quality Foods, Inc.,

293 F.3d 1133, 1138 (9th Cir. 2002); Molski v. Arby’s Huntington

Beach, 359 F. Supp. 2d 938, 947 (C.D. Cal. 2005). Defendant’s

argument to the contrary is therefore rejected.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s motion

to dismiss is denied. 

DATED: October 11, 2005.

DAD:th

orders.prose\johnson2712.mtd

Case 2:04-cv-02712-DAD Document 35 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2