Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00029/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00029-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,

SHEPPARD, WAYTE &

CARRUTH LLP 

1125 I STREET, STE. 1 

MODESTO, CA 95354 

Kelley N. Moran, SBN 222748 

Stephanie Y. Wu, SBN 268948 

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, 

WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 

1125 I Street, Suite 1 

Modesto, California 95354 

T: (209) 524-1100 | F: (209) 524-1188 

kelley.moran@mccormickbarstow.com 

stephanie.wu@mccormickbarstow.com 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

CERES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

SCOTT SIEGEL, LINDA STUBBS, and 

SHAWNA NUNES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JACK MILLER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CERES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

SCOTT SIEGEL, in his official capacity, 

LINDA STUBBS, in his official capacity, 

SHAWNA NUNES, in his official capacity, 

MICHAEL PHIPPS dba RIVER OAKS GOLF 

COURSE, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 Case No. 1:15-cv-00029-DAD-BAM 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 

 Hon. Dale A. Drozd 

Plaintiff JACK MILLER (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants CERES UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, SCOTT SIEGEL, in his official capacity, LINDA STUBBS, in her official capacity, and 

SHAWNA NUNES, in her official capacity (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their 

attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff JACK MILLER filed a Second Amended Complaint on December 14, 

2015; 

WHEREAS, Defendants filed their Answer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint on 

January 5, 2016; 

Case 1:15-cv-00029-DAD-BAM Document 57 Filed 03/24/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,

SHEPPARD, WAYTE &

CARRUTH LLP 

7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET 

FRESNO, CA 93720 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses from Defendants’ Answer 

on January 25, 2016; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff JACK MILLER filed a Third Amended Complaint on February 26, 

2016; 

WHEREAS, the Court entered an order on February 26, 2016 denied Plaintiff’s Motion to 

Strike as moot; 

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have been diligently meeting and conferring to resolve 

Plaintiff’s issues concerning Defendants’ affirmative defenses, in an effort to reach an amicable 

resolution, so as to avoid the need for Plaintiff to file a Motion to Strike upon Defendants’ filing of 

their Answer to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among the parties to this action, that Defendants’ 

deadline to file and serve their response to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint shall be extended by 

ten (10) days, to March 31, 2016. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 22, 2016 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, 

WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 

By: /s/ Stephanie Y. Wu 

 Stephanie Y. Wu 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

 CERES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SCOTT 

SIEGEL, LINDA STUBBS, and SHAWNA 

NUNES 

Dated: March 22, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL MALAKAUSKAS 

By: /s/ Daniel Malakauskas 

 Daniel Malakauskas 

Attorneys for Plaintif, 

JACK MILLER 

 

Case 1:15-cv-00029-DAD-BAM Document 57 Filed 03/24/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,

SHEPPARD, WAYTE &

CARRUTH LLP 

7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET 

FRESNO, CA 93720 

ORDER 

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that 

Defendants’ deadline to file and serve their response to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint shall be 

extended by ten (10) days, to March 31, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 24, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:15-cv-00029-DAD-BAM Document 57 Filed 03/24/16 Page 3 of 3