Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00421/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00421-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 196
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERA FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-07-0421 FCD GGH PS

vs.

PHIL HUIE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed June 21, 2007, defendants were ordered to show cause, within

fifteen days, why the court should not recommend that the answer be stricken for failure to

participate in the joint status report, and for failure to obey court orders. The fifteen day period

has now expired, and defendants have not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s

order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants’ answer be stricken.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:07-cv-00421-FCD-GGH Document 14 Filed 08/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 8/14/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

ERA.fsc

Case 2:07-cv-00421-FCD-GGH Document 14 Filed 08/14/07 Page 2 of 2