Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00507/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00507-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEIL PARIS SUGARMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARK PAZIN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00507-AWI-SKO PC

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE 

A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY

BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983

(Docs. 1 and 7)

ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT 

TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G)

Plaintiff Neil Paris Sugarman, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 2, 2012. On October 26, 2012, the Court

dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended

complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). To date, Plaintiff has not

complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file 1

which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. 

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), this action is

HEREBYDISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted under section 1983. This dismissal is subject to the “three-strikes” provision set

forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Silva v. Di Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098-99 (9th Cir. 2011).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 2, 2013 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On November 7, 2012, the United States Postal Service returned the order as undeliverable. A notation on

1

the envelope indicates that Plaintiff is not in custody. However, Plaintiff has not notified the Court of any change in

his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 182(f).

1

Case 1:12-cv-00507-AWI-SKO Document 8 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 1