Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06443/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06443-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTHA RIVERA, MAO HER, ALICIA

ALVAREZ, EVA ARRIOLA, PEUANG

BOUNNHONG, CHHOM CHAN, BEE

LEE, PAULA MARTINEZ, MARIA

MEDINA, MAI MEEMOUA,

MARGARITA MENDOZA, BAO NHIA

MOUA, ISIDRA MURILLO, MARIA

NAVARRO, VATH RATTANATAY,

OFELIA RIVERA, SARA RIVERA,

MARIA RODRIGUEZ, MARIA RUIZ,

MARIA VALDIVIA, SY VANG, YOUA

XIONG, and SEE YANG, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

NIBCO, INC., an Indiana corporation,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CIV F-99 6443 AWI SMS

STIPULATION BETWEEN

PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT

TO FILE DOCUMENTS IN

SUPPORT OF THE PARTY’S

RESPECTIVE OPPOSITION TO

THE PENDING MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN

THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY

ADJUDICATION, AND ORDER

THEREON

Oppositions to the pending motions for summary judgment are due October 28, 2005. On

October 27, 2005, the parties filed the following stipulation:

Plaintiffs, Martha Rivera, et al., and Defendant NIBCO, et al., hereby stipulate and agree that

each party may file the following documents, based on their respective representations as to the

contents, in support of their respective opposition to the pending Motions for Summary Judgment,

or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication, under seal pursuant to Local Rule 39-141.

Case 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Document 328 Filed 10/28/05 Page 1 of 4
Defendant NIBCO will file the documents listed in Attachment “B” hereto. Plaintiffs

will file the documents listed in Attachment “C” hereto.

Attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is an Application to file the supporting documents

identified above under seal. The Application sets forth the reasons for the request to file the

documents under seal.

DATED: October 27, 2005. THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY EMPLOYMENT

LAW CENTER

/s/ Willie N. Nguyen

Willie N. Nguyen

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED: October 27, 2005. SAGASER, JONES & HAHESY

By: /s/ Sarah Wolfe

Sarah Wolfe, 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NIBCO, INC.

EXHIBIT “B”

Defendant NIBCO, Inc., wishes to file the documents identified below each of which

has attached confidential proprietary information and/or material that is subject one or all of the

protective orders issued by this Court, including but not limited to the Protective Order issued by

Magistrate Sandra M. Snyder on or about June 15, 2001 as well as those issued on June 18, 2001,

and April 30, 2001.

1. Declaration of Connie Williams.

2. Declaration of William C. Hahesy, which includes, among other documents,

the following: 

Excerpts from Plaintiff’s deposition transcripts, subject to the June

15, 2001, Protective Order issued by Magistrate Snyder.

Case 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Document 328 Filed 10/28/05 Page 2 of 4
Excerpts from deposition transcripts that contain information

concerning either the Plaintiffs and/or confidential financial

information.

3. Declaration of Douglas Kieper.

4. NIBCO’s MemorandumofPoints andAuthorities in Support of its opposition

to Plaintiffs’ pending Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication,

which includes specific references to and quotations from Plaintiffs’ deposition transcripts as well

as NIBCO’s confidential financial documents. 

5. Defendant’s Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in support of

its motion, which contains specific citations to Plaintiff’s deposition transcripts, NIBCO’s

confidential financial documents, and information subject to a protective order.

6. The Declaration of Rita Garcia.

7. Declaration of Dirk Milligan.

8. Declaration of John Hall. 

9. Declaration of Aaron DeOcio.

10. Declaration of Mark K. Lueger. 

11. Declaration of Chin Minh Dao.

12. Declaration of Michael S. Helelsy.

13. Declaration of Malcom Cohen.

EXHIBIT “C”

Plaintiffs will file the following documents, each of which has confidential information

regarding plaintiffs and confidential business information which are subject to various protective orders in this

case:

1. Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points andAuthoritiesinOpposition toDefendant's pending

Motions for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication, which contain quotations and references to

information; including, among other things, plaintiffs' deposition testimony and confidential business

information;

Case 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Document 328 Filed 10/28/05 Page 3 of 4
2. Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants' Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts

which contain quotations and references to information - including, among other things, plaintiffs' deposition

testimony and confidential business information;

3. Declaration of Ann M. Blankenship, which includes various documents such as

deposition transcripts, personnel records, and expert reports that include confidential information about

plaintiffs and about business operations.

ORDER

The court having reviewed the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing

therefore: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the documents identified in Exhibit “B” may be

filed by Defendant NIBCO, Inc. in support of its opposition to Plaintiffs’ pending Motion for

Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication, and the documents identified in

Exhibit “C” may be filed by Plaintiffs in opposition to Defendant’s pending Motion for Summary

Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication, shall be filed by the Clerk of the Court under

seal and remain so until further order of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 28, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Document 328 Filed 10/28/05 Page 4 of 4