Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03502/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03502-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)

---

_________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND ORDER THEREON 

 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY ST. 

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

ROBERT M. LIEBER, ESQ. SBN: 039976 

NAKI M. IRVIN, ESQ. SBN: 094120 

CATHY S. BEYDA, ESQ. SBN: 148176 

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

601 Montgomery St., Suite 2030 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone 415-986-2144 

Fax 415-968-4461 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LTD and 

INDUSTRIAL LIGHT & MAGIC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DREW KLAUSNER; 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT 

COMPANY, LTD., a California corporation, 

INDUSTRIAL LIGHT & MAGIC, a California 

corporation; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. CV 09-03502-CW

Assigned for all Purposes to: 

Hon. CLAUDIA WILKIN, Courtroom 2 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE 

ORDER; AND ORDER THEREON 

Action Filed: July 30, 2009 

Trial Date: April 11, 2011 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 14
 

1 _________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY STREET

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 

and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted. 

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 

Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 

all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited 

information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as 

confidential. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 10, below, that this Stipulated 

Protective Order creates no entitlement to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 

79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied 

when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 

2. DEFINITIONS

 2.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 

employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff). 

 2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 

medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 

transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 

discovery in this matter. 

 2.3 “Confidential” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under standards 

developed under F.R.Civ.P. 26(c). 

 2.4 “Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or Items: 

extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” whose disclosure to another Party or nonparty would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive 

means. 

 2.5 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from 

a Producing Party. 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 2 of 14
 

2 _________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY STREET

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

 2.6 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 

Material in this Action. 

 2.7 Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or items 

that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

 2.8 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated 

as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

 2.9 Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are 

retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 

 2.10 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. 

 2.11 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well as 

their support staffs). 

 2.12 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 

pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert 

witness or as a consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or of 

a competitor of a Party’s and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an 

employee of a Party or a competitor of a Party’s. This definition includes a professional jury or trial 

consultant retained in connection with this litigation. 

 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 

services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; 

organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and 

subcontractors. 

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 

(as defined above), but also any information contained in, copied or extracted therefrom, as well as 

all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or 

presentations by parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected 

Material. 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 3 of 14
 

3 _________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY STREET

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

4. DURATION

Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 

Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 

otherwise directs. 

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each 

Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take 

care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. 

A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of material, 

documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the 

material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 

unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown 

to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily 

encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens 

on other parties), expose the Designating Party to Sanctions. 

If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items that it designated 

for protection do now qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of protection 

initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing 

the mistaken designation. 

 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this 

Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 

material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 

material is disclosed or produced. 

 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 

 (a) For information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of 

depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” at the top of 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 4 of 14
 

4 _________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY STREET

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 

qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 

by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of 

protection being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). 

 A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials 

available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has 

indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the 

designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the 

documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or 

portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, then, before producing the specified 

documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) at the top of each page that contains 

Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 

the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 

markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted 

(either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”). 

 (b) For testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial 

proceedings, that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, 

before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further 

specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY.” When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is 

entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for 

protection, the Party or non-party that sponsors, offers, or gives the testimony may invoke on the 

record (before the deposition or proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to 20 days to identify 

the specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of 

protection being asserted (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 5 of 14
 

5 _________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY STREET

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

EYES ONLY”). Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for 

protection within the 20 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

 Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by 

the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as instructed by the Party or nonparty offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony. 

 (c) For information produced in some form other than documentary, and 

for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of 

the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only 

portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent 

practicable, shall identify the protected portions, specifying whether they qualify as “Confidential” 

Or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 

 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure 

to designate qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ 

Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under 

this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only” after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, 

on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is 

treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s 

confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary 

economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive 

its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly 

after the original designation is disclosed. 

 6.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating 

Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 6 of 14
 

6 _________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY STREET

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient) 

with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party must explain the basis 

for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designing Party 

an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change 

in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A challenging Party may 

proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer 

process first. 

 6.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a 

confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party may 

file and serve a motion under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if 

applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. 

Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the movant has 

complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that sets 

forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the 

Designating Party in the meet and confer dialogue. 

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating 

Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the material in 

question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation. 

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 

disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for 

prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be 

disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When 

the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 11, 

below (FINAL DISPOSITION). 

 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 

location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under 

this Order. 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 7 of 14
 

7 _________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY STREET

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

 7.2 Disclosure of ‘CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise 

ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, any information or item 

designated CONFIDENTIAL may be disclosed only to: 

 (a) The Receiving Party and the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of 

record in this action, as well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to 

disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

 (b) The officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of 

the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have 

signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

 (d) The Court and its personnel; 

 (e) Court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

 (f) During their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure 

is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” 

that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to 

depositions that reveal Protected Material must be stamped confidential by the court reporter, or by 

the parties in the event that the contents are designated “CONFIDENTIAL” after the transcript is 

prepared. The confidential portions of any such transcript may not be disclosed to anyone except as 

permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order. 

 (g) The author of the document or the original source of the information. 

 7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 

Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 8 of 14
 

8 _________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY STREET

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 

 (a) The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as 

well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information 

for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is 

attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

(b) House Counsel of a Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably 

necessary for this litigation and who has signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” 

that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) to whom disclosure is reasonably 

necessary for this litigation, who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” 

that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

(d) the Court and its personnel; 

(e) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be 

Bound by Protective Order” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and 

(f) the author of the document or the original source of the information. 

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN 

OTHER LITIGATION.

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that 

would compel disclosure of any information or items designed in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” 

or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the Receiving Party must so 

notify the Designating Party, in writing (by email or fax) immediately and in no event more than 

three court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the 

subpoena or court order. 

 The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who caused 

the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the 

subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must 

deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the Party in the other action that 

caused the subpoena or order to issue. 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 9 of 14
 

9 _________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY STREET

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

 The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence 

of this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to 

protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The 

Designating party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking protection in that court of its 

confidential material – and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or 

encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 

9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order, 

the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the 

unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, (c) 

inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this 

Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to 

Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

10. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL

All parties filing any protected material with the court must comply with Civil Local Rule 

79-5. 

11. FINAL DISPOSITION

Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within thirty days 

after the final termination of this action, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to 

the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, 

abstracts, compilations, summaries, notes or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of the 

Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating party, the Receiving Party 

may destroy some or all of the Protected Material in a manner agreed in writing instead of returning 

it. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a 

written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating 

Party) by the thirty day deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected 

Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving party has not retained 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 10 of 14
 

10 _________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY STREET

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of 

the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival 

copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney 

work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that 

contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in 

Section 4 (DURATION), above. 

12. MISCELLANEOUS

 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 

person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 

 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order 

no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any 

information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order . Similarly, 

no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material 

covered by this Protective Order. 

Dated: March 11, 2010 MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

 By: /S/ Robert M. Lieber 

 ROBERT M. LIEBER 

 Attorneys for Defendant INDUSTRIAL 

LIGHT & MAGIC, a division of LUCASFILM 

ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, LTD. 

Dated: March 11, 2010 PIERCE & SHEARER LLP 

 By: /S/ Stacy North _______ 

 STACY NORTH 

ANDREW PIERCE 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DREW KLAUSNER 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED. 

Dated:_____________________ _____________________________________ Honorable Claudia Wilkin 

 Judge for the United States District Court

3/22/2010 Wilken

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 11 of 14
 

0 _________________________________________ 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

BY STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY ST. 

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 12 of 14
 

1 _________________________________________ 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

BY STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY ST. 

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

EXHIBIT A 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DREW KLAUSNER; 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT 

COMPANY, LTD., a California corporation, 

INDUSTRIAL LIGHT & MAGIC, a California 

corporation; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. CV 09-03502-CW

Assigned for all Purposes to: 

Hon. CLAUDIA WILKIN, Courtroom 2 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND 

AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Action Filed: July 30, 2009 

Trial Date: None 

I, _______________________________________ [print or type full name], of 

______________________________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of 

perjury, that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was 

issued by the United States District Court, Northern District of California on _______, 2010 in the 

case of “Drew Klausner v. Lucasfilm, et al., United States District Case No. CV 09-03502-CW. I 

agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I 

understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and 

punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 13 of 14
 

2 _________________________________________ 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

BY STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

 

 Printed on Recycled Paper 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

-------------------- 

601 MONTGOMERY ST. 

SUITE 2030 

SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA 94111 

any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity 

except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. 

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 

purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement 

proceedings occur after termination of this Action. 

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 

____________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as 

my California agent for service of process in connection with this Action and any proceedings 

related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 

In the event that the Stipulated Protective Order is not entered by the United States District 

Court, I agree to nevertheless, be bound by the stipulations contained herein as though and on the 

same terms and conditions as if it had been entered into as an order of the Court and agree that the 

Parties have a separate and independent contractual obligation to do so. 

Date: __________________________________________ 

City and State where sworn and signed: _____________________________________ 

Printed Name: _____________________________________ 

Signature: ________________________________________ 

Case 4:09-cv-03502-CW Document 29 Filed 03/22/10 Page 14 of 14