Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04539/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04539-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint

White et al. v. Square, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-04539-JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WILLIAM McGRANE [057761] 

McGRANE PC

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 

San Francisco, California 94111 

(415) 292-4807 

william.mcgrane@mcgranepc.com

FRANK R. UBHAUS [046085] 

BERLINER COHEN LLP

10 Almaden Boulevard, 11th Floor 

San Jose, CA 95113 

(408) 286-5800 

frank.ubhaus@berliner.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert White, an individual and all others similarly situated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ROBERT WHITE, an individual

 Plaintiff, 

v.

SQUARE, INC., a Delaware corporation,

 Defendant. 

Case No. 3:15-cv-04539-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

Case 3:15-cv-04539-JST Document 27 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 3
1 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint

White et al. v. Square, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-04539-JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This stipulation is entered into as a professional courtesy because Mr. McGrane, 

Plaintiff’s lead counsel, will be out of state and unavailable from January 12 through 

January 25, 2016. 

The parties to this action stipulate that the time to respond to Plaintiff White’s 

First Amended Complaint is hereby extended from January 19, 2016, to January 26, 

2016, and that Defendant will not file its response until that date. It is expected that 

Defendant will be filing a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. The 

schedule, if such a motion is filed, will be: 

• Defendant’s motion will be filed on Thursday, January 26, 2016. The 

motion will be set for the earliest reasonably available time after the reply 

brief due date below; 

• Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s motion will be due on February 9, 

2016, and 

• Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition will be due on February 18, 

2016. 

SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: January 7, 2016 McGRANE PC

BERLINER COHEN LLP

By: /s/ William McGrane 

William McGrane

Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert White and all others 

similarly situated

Dated: January 7, 2016 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Colleen Bal_________________________ 

Colleen Bal

Attorneys for Defendant Square, Inc.

Case 3:15-cv-04539-JST Document 27 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 3
2 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint

White et al. v. Square, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-04539-JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SO ORDERED: 

Dated: January 7, 2016 

Hon. Jon. S. Tigar

United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:15-cv-04539-JST Document 27 Filed 01/07/16 Page 3 of 3