Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01142/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01142-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRELL L. DIETLE, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1142 KJM P

vs.

MIKE McDONALD, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil

rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On November 20, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion to add an additional defendant

and additional exhibits to his complaint. On November 24, 2009, the court dismissed his

complaint with leave to file an amended complaint. Should plaintiff so choose, he may

incorporate the materials referenced in his November 20th filing in his amended complaint, if

such incorporation otherwise complies with the court’s November 24th order and the applicable

federal and local rules.

Plaintiff is cautioned to include all information necessary with his amended

complaint; should he continue to file materials not related to a pending motion or required by

court order, he may be subject to sanctions, including dismissal. Kane Gas Light And Heating

1

Case 2:09-cv-01142-FCD-KJM Document 15 Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Company v. Penzoil Company, 587 F.Supp. 910 (W.D. Penn. 1984) (arguments and evidence not

included in the appropriate pleading constitutes "sandbagging" and is not permissible); see King 

Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987) (pro se plaintiff must follow rules of procedure).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff’s motion to add a defendant and enter exhibits (docket no. 9) is

denied; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to his action, in

light of plaintiff’s failure to return his consent form. 

DATED: January 6, 2010. 

2

diet1142.ord

2

Case 2:09-cv-01142-FCD-KJM Document 15 Filed 01/07/10 Page 2 of 2