Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00568/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00568-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

1 

Stipulated Request for Continuance of Hearing on Motion to Dismiss; [Proposed] Order Granting Continuance 

& GREENE LLP 

James F. Sweeney (SBN 124527) 

Stephen J. Greene, Jr. (SBN 178098) 

Eric Grant (SBN 151064) 

9381 East Stockton Blvd., Suite 218 

Elk Grove, CA 95624 

Telephone: (916) 753-1300 

Facsimile: (916) 753-1333 

NAGELY, MEREDITH, & MILLER 

Andrea M. Miller (SBN: 088992) 

8001 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 100 

Sacramento, CA 95826 

Telephone No.: (916) 386-8282 

Facsimile No.: (916) 386-8952 

Attorneys for Defendant John Roe 1, 

(the Roman Catholic Bishop of Sacramento, 

a Corporation Sole)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HECTOR RUBIO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JOHN ROE 1, JOHN ROE 2, and ROES 3 

through 100, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:07−CV−00568−WBS−GGH 

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER 

CONTINUING HEARING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE 

TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH 

RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED (RULE 

12(b)(6)); [PROPOSED] ORDER 

GRANTING CONTINUANCE 

THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY 

STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

Whereas Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint, which modifies the original 

complaint by, among other things, adding and deleting causes of action; and 

Whereas there is pending on the Court’s docket, for hearing on May 29, 2007, Defendant’s 

Motion to Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted (the Motion 

to Dismiss), filed by Defendant as a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s original complaint that was 

filed in state court prior to removal to this Court; and 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:07-cv-00568-WBS-GGH Document 17 Filed 05/17/07 Page 1 of 2
2 

Stipulated Request for Continuance of Hearing on Motion to Dismiss; [Proposed] Order Granting Continuance 

Whereas Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand this action to state court is currently pending and 

also set for hearing on May 29, 2007; 

The Parties hereby stipulate to the entry by the Court of an order continuing the hearing for 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, until July 23, 2007, to permit the issues raised in Plaintiff’s 

Motion to Remand to be resolved prior to Defendant filing a revised Motion to Dismiss directed at 

the content of the First Amended Complaint. 

DATED: May 14, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH C. GEORGE 

By: _____________________________ 

Joseph C. George 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff Hector Rubio 

DATED: May_14, 2007 SWEENEY & GREENE LLP 

By: __________/S/___________________ 

Stephen J. Greene, Jr. 

Attorneys for Defendant ROMAN CATHOLIC 

BISHOP OF SACRAMENTO 

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Roman Catholic Bishop of Sacramento, a corporation sole’s 

Motion to Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted be continued 

from May 29, 2007 to July 23, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. 

Date: May 14, 2007 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:07-cv-00568-WBS-GGH Document 17 Filed 05/17/07 Page 2 of 2