Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00724/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00724-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT BIAGAS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0724 LKK EFB P

vs.

CSP SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner, without counsel, seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 15, 2007, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to

amend on the grounds that he failed to state a cognizable claim against any defendant. The order

explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint

correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that his failure to file an amended complaint

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. On

August 29, 2007, plaintiff requested his fourth extension of time in which to file an amended

complaint. On September 4, 2007, the court granted plaintiff one final extension of time, warned

plaintiff that no further extensions would be granted, and that failure to file an amended

complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to state a

claim. 

Case 2:07-cv-00724-LKK -EFB Document 24 Filed 10/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The 20-day period granted in the court’s September 4, 2007, order has expired and

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to

state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 12, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-00724-LKK -EFB Document 24 Filed 10/15/07 Page 2 of 2