Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06946/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06946-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

CORETRONIC CORPORATION and

OPTOMA TECHNOLOGY INC.,

 

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

No. C 06-6946 MHP

JUDGMENT

(Fed.R.Civ.P. 58)

This action having come before this court, the Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel, United States

District Judge presiding, and the issues having been duly presented and an order having been duly

filed May 15, 2009, declaring United States Patent Numbers 6,527,392 ("the '392 patent") and

6,742,899 ("the '899 patent") invalid on grounds of obviousness and an order having been duly filed

November 23, 2010, declaring United States Patent Number 6,203,158 ("the '158 patent") invalid on

the grounds of obviousness, and a request for entry of judgment under Federal Civil Rule 58(d)

having been filed stating that the above orders resolve all claims and issues pending in this case and

the court so finding; and, there being no just reason for delay, 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that defendant/counter-claimant CORETRONIC

CORPORATION and OPTOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC.s' motions for summary judgment to

invalidate claims 1, 3, 4, 7, 9 and 10 of the '392 patent and to invalidate claims 1, 2 and 5 of the '158

Case 3:06-cv-06946-MHP Document 421 Filed 01/05/11 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

patent are GRANTED and the action of plaintiff/counter-defendant SEIKO EPSON

CORPORATION is DISMISSED in its entirety. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff/counter-defendant SEIKO

EPSON CORPORATION's motion for summary judgment to invalidate claims 1, 2, 3, 7, 9 and 11

of the '899 patent is GRANTED and the counterclaim of CORETRONIC CORPORATION and

OPTOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC. for infringement of the '899 patent is DISMISSED in its entirety.. 

DATED: January 5, 2011 __________________________

MARILYN HALL PATEL

Judge

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Case 3:06-cv-06946-MHP Document 421 Filed 01/05/11 Page 2 of 2