Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01722/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01722-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On February 3, 2017, the plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal. (Doc. 9) Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure Rule 41 provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) 

a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary 

judgment . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is 

not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 

111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action 

in light of the notice of dismissal with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 6, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PARAMOUNT PETROLEUM 

CORPORATION ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE 

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-01722 LJO JLT 

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE 

COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

Case 1:16-cv-01722-LJO-JLT Document 10 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 1