Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-04879/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-04879-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)

---

-1- STIPULATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING Case : 4:14-cv-04879-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GEOFFREY E. WIGGS (SBN 276041)

LAW OFFICES OF GEOFF WIGGS

1900 S. Norfolk St, Suite # 350

San Mateo, Ca 94403

geoff@wiggslaw.com

Telephone: (650) 577-5952

Facsimile: (650) 577-5953

Scott R. Kaufman (SBN 190129)

Kaufman Law Offices, Inc.

140 Third Street

Los Altos, Ca 94022

Telephone: 650-383-6663

Facsimile: 650-383-6667

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CRYSTAL IVY & CHENG SAEPHAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND/SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TO THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT JUDGE:

The undersigned parties, by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On November 17, 2015, Plaintiffs Crystal Ivy and Cheng Saephan filed a Motion to Amend 

the Pleading to name a recently-disclosed, previously-unknown Doe Defendant.

CRYSTAL IVY, an individual, and 

CHENG SAEPHAN, an individual,

 Plaintiffs,

v. 

FAROOQ QASSIM MAYET , 

individually and dba RICHMOND 

AUTO SALES, RAJESHWAR SINGH 

individually and dba RICHMOND 

AUTO SALES and DOES 1-50, 

INCLUSIVE.

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 4:14-cv-04879-HSG (EDL)

STIPULATION TO ORDER SHORTENING

TIME FOR NOTICE OF HEARING ON 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 

PLEADING TO NAME LATEDETERMINED DOE DEFENDANT 

Current Hearing Date: December 24, 2015

Current Hearing Time: 2:00 p.m.

Courtroom: 15

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr

Case 4:14-cv-04879-HSG Document 44 Filed 12/01/15 Page 1 of 3
-2- STIPULATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING Case : 4:14-cv-04879-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Currently appearing Defendants have no opposition to oppose Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend 

the pleadings.

3. Counsel for Plaintiffs and Counsel for the currently appearing Defendants seek to have this 

Motion heard on Shortened Time.

4. A hearing on this matter as early as possible is requested as trial is currently set for 

February 1, 2016, and Plaintiffs’ Motion seeks to add a new party to this matter.

5. Counsel have met and conferred and seek to have Plaintiffs’ Motion heard on the Court’s 

Civil Calendar on December 1, 3, 8, or 10 at 2:00 p.m.

6. No briefing schedule is necessary as Defendants do not intend to oppose Plaintiffs’ Motion.

oo0oo

Respectfully submitted:

Law Offices of Geoff Wiggs

Date: November 18, 2015 ___________________________

Geoffrey E. Wiggs, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiffs

CRYSTAL IVY & CHENG SAEPHAN

ANDERLINI & McSWEENEY LLP

Date: November 18, 2015 ___________________________

Constantine P. Tsagaris

Attorney for Defendants 

Date: November 18, 2015 _/s/ Scott R. Kaufman 

Scott R. Kaufman 

Kaufman Law Offices, Inc.

Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs

CRYSTAL IVY & CHENG SAEPHAN

Case 4:14-cv-04879-HSG Document 44 Filed 12/01/15 Page 2 of 3
-1- ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR OST Case : 4:14-cv-04879-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Having considered Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ Stipulation to Order Shortening Time 

For Notice Of Hearing On Motion For Leave To Amend Pleading To Name Late-Determined

Doe Defendant, and finding good cause therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Pleading To Name LateDetermined Doe Defendant will be heard on ____________________ at ________ .

No Briefing Schedule will be set as Defendants have indicated they have no opposition 

to Plaintiffs’ Motion.

oo0oo

Date: ________________ ___________________________

Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.

United States District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. 

Case 4:14-cv-04879-HSG Document 44 Filed 12/01/15 Page 3 of 3