Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-03284/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-03284-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 310
Nature of Suit: Airplane Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Airline Crash

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIANA HUDSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 18-cv-03284-PJH 

ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER 

BRIEF

Re: Dkt. No. 32

The court is in receipt of the parties’ joint “discovery” letter brief wherein plaintiff 

seeks to exclude defendants’ two rebuttal expert disclosures. Having reviewed that 

briefing and the supporting papers, the court finds that plaintiff’s position lacks merit and 

therefore DENIES plaintiff’s request. 

While the court has chosen to rule on plaintiff’s request now in order to permit the 

parties to effectively prepare for trial, plaintiff’s request would have been more 

appropriately brought as a motion in limine. The parties are warned that future 

evidentiary matters should be raised in motions in limine in accordance with the timeline 

and procedures set forth in the court’s pretrial order. See Dkt. 20.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2019

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:18-cv-03284-PJH Document 36 Filed 06/14/19 Page 1 of 1