Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00059/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00059-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1319 Clean Water Act

---

1

ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT BASED UPON CONSENT DECREE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Matthew C. Maclear (Bar No. 209228) 

Jason Flanders (Bar No. 238007)

AQUA TERRA AERIS LAW GROUP

7425 Fairmount Ave. 

El Cerrito, CA 94530

Phone: 415-568-5200

Emails: 

mcm@atalawgroup.com

jrf@atalawgroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

COMMUNITY HEALTH WATCH and

GLOBAL COMMUNITY MONITOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

COMMUNITY HEALTH WATCH, a California 

unincorporated association; GLOBAL 

COMMUNITY MONITOR, a California non-profit 

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COLLINS PINE COMPANY, a Oregon 

corporation; and DOES 1-25

Defendants.

Civil Case No.: 2:15-cv-00059-TLN-AC

ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 

65 SETTLEMENT BASED UPON 

CONSENT DECREE

(Federal Water Pollution Control Act,

33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq.; California 

Health and Safety Code §§ 25249.5 et 

seq.) 

Honorable Troy L. Nunley

DATE: November 5, 2015

TIME: 2:00 p.m.

DEPT.: Courtroom 2, 15th Floor

Action Filed: January 8, 2015

This matter having come on calendar pursuant to a regularly noticed motion and the Court 

having reviewed all the evidence submitted in support of Plaintiffs’, COMMUNITY HEALTH WATCH 

and GLOBAL COMMUNITY MONITOR, Motion to Approve and supporting documents, including the 

proposed Stipulated Consent Decree, attached hereto, the Court hereby makes the following findings, 

pursuant to Health & Safety Code section 25249.7, subdivision (f)(4):

Case 2:15-cv-00059-TLN-AC Document 13 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT BASED UPON CONSENT DECREE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. No warning is required and any warning that may be have been required has been 

satisfied/mooted by the terms of the Stipulated Consent Decree. 

2. The attorneys’ fees provisions in the Stipulated Consent Decree are reasonable under 

California law; and

3. The civil penalty and payments in lieu of civil penalties imposed by the Stipulated Consent 

Decree are reasonable based on the criteria set forth in Health & Safety Code section 

25249.7, subdivision (b)(2) and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 11, section 3203, respectively.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulated Consent Decree submitted in this matter is approved and 

will be entered in accordance with the terms thereof.

Dated: October 27, 2015

Case 2:15-cv-00059-TLN-AC Document 13 Filed 10/28/15 Page 2 of 2