Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01050/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01050-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

MUNDO TRAVEL CORPORATION, a )

corporation, and ERIK VALLEJO,)

 )

Defendants. )

)

) 

No. CV-F-05-1050 REC LJO

ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC

MODIFYING THE COURT’S ORDER

GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.

12(b)(6) AND DIRECTING

PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN

AMENDED COMPLAINT. 

(Doc. 22) 

On January 26, 2006, the Court issued its Order Granting in

Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and

Directing Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint (the “Order”)

(Doc. 22).

On line 25 of page 19 of the Order, through line 1 of page

20, the Court wrote: “Under a provable set of facts, the Court

ultimately could conclude that the ARA does obligate Mundo to

follow the Policy.”

The Court hereby modifies the Order nunc pro tunc so that

Case 1:05-cv-01050-REC-LJO Document 24 Filed 02/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

sentence reads, “Under a provable set of facts, the Court

ultimately could conclude that the ARA does not obligate Mundo to

follow the Policy.”

In all other respects, the Order remains unchanged.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 13, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

810ha4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01050-REC-LJO Document 24 Filed 02/13/06 Page 2 of 2