Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-24-07029/USCOURTS-caDC-24-07029-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 24-7029 September Term, 2023

1:23-cv-03478-UNA

Filed On: June 26, 2024

Inez Qtaish,

Appellant

v.

Steven J. Malman and Phillip L Radmer,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Wilkins, Childs, and Pan, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order entered December

13, 2023, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint for

failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). Appellant’s complaint did not

set forth “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to

relief,” which is required in order to “give the defendant[] fair notice of what the claim is

and the grounds upon which it rests.” Jones v. Kirchner, 835 F.3d 74, 79 (D.C. Cir.

2016) (citing Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). 

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #24-7029 Document #2061693 Filed: 06/26/2024 Page 1 of 1