Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-05806/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-05806-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CARL MARSCELLAS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-05806-BLF 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; NOTICE 

OF IMMINENT DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs filed this action on October 24, 2013. ECF 1 at 2. Since September 17, 2014, 

Plaintiffs have not taken any action in this case including failing to respond to a motion to dismiss 

by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank and failing to appear at the hearing on that motion to dismiss. A 

failure to attend hearings, comply with court orders, and a failure to prosecute an action are each 

grounds for dismissal with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See, e.g., Bowling v. Hasbro, 

Inc., 403 F.3d 1373, 1375-77 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (applying the law of the Ninth Circuit).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before January 

11, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with court 

orders and for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff does not respond, the Court will dismiss the action 

with prejudice with respect all Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) 

without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 15, 2015

 ______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:13-cv-05806-BLF Document 59 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 1