Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00559/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00559-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES P. DeFAZIO,

Plaintiff,

v. NO. CIV. S-04-1358 LKK/GGH

HOLLISTER, INC., Plan 

Administrator; et al.,

Defendants.

 /

KATHLEEN ELLIS,

Plaintiff,

v. NO. CIV. S-05-559 LKK/GGH

HOLLISTER, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

BRENDA DIMARO; and HALLIE LAVICK,

Plaintiffs,

v. NO. CIV. S-05-1726 LKK/GGH

HOLLISTER, INC., et al.,

O R D E R

Defendants.

 /

Case 2:05-cv-00559-WBS-GGH Document 105 Filed 04/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1 As noted during the Status Conference, the parties should

focus on how each proposal would increase efficiency and

convenience for the court. 

2

On April 24, 2006, a Status Conference was held in the abovecaptioned cases. Based on discussions during that conference, the

court hereby ORDERS as follows:

1. Within ten (10) days of the Status Conference, the parties

shall file briefs not exceeding ten (10) pages proposing how the

above-captioned cases should be tried to the court.1

2. All dates in DeFazio v. Hollister, No. Civ. S-04-1358, are

VACATED.

3. Defendants in Ellis v. Hollister, No. Civ. S-05-559, and

Dimaro v. Hollister, No. Civ. S-05-1726, are granted a twenty-one

(21) day extension to file their answers.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 26, 2006

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:05-cv-00559-WBS-GGH Document 105 Filed 04/28/06 Page 2 of 2