Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00430/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00430-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JARAMIE JEROME KINSEY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TRAVIS DECKER, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:19-cv-0430-JAM-EFB P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

Plaintiff, a former pretrial detainee, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 

42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

 On February 5, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A. ECF No. 14. The court dismissed the complaint, explained the deficiencies therein, 

and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. 

Id. The screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation 

that this action be dismissed. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not filed an 

amended complaint. Thus, it appears that plaintiff is unable or unwilling to cure the defects in the 

complaint. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:19-cv-00430-JAM-EFB Document 15 Filed 03/11/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice 

for the reasons set forth in the February 5, 2020 screening order (ECF No. 14). 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: March 11, 2020. 

Case 2:19-cv-00430-JAM-EFB Document 15 Filed 03/11/20 Page 2 of 2