Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00691/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00691-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

IVIDEON LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00691-JST 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: ECF No. 34

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. ECF No. 34. 

Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges Defendants infringed five of Plaintiff’s patents. ECF No. 1. In 

December 2015, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued decisions instituting inter 

partes review regarding each of these patents. See e.Digital Corp. v. Dropcam, Inc., No. 14-cv4922-JST, ECF No. 87, at 2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2016). On February 18, 2016, this Court stayed 

another patent infringement action in which Plaintiff asserted these same five patents (as well as 

one additional patent) pending the inter partes review proceedings. Id. at 8.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, within fourteen days of the filing of this 

order, why this case should not be stayed pending inter partes review of the patents-in-suit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 24, 2016

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00691-JST Document 43 Filed 02/24/16 Page 1 of 1