Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00636/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00636-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Injunction

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation and Order (2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD)

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672

Attorney General of California

TAMAR PACHTER, State Bar No. 146083

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON, State Bar No. 207650

KEVIN A. CALIA, State Bar No. 227406

Deputy Attorneys General

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000

San Francisco, CA 94102-7004

Telephone: (415) 703-5509

Fax: (415) 703-5480

E-mail: Alexandra.RobertGordon@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendant Attorney General Harris

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

CENTER FOR COMPETITIVE 

POLITICS,

Plaintiff,

v.

KAMALA HARRIS, in her Official 

Capacity as Attorney General of the State of 

California, 

 Defendant.

2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR 

OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

(Local Rule 144 (a))

Courtroom: 7, 14th Floor

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

Trial Date: None Set

Action Filed: March 7, 2014

Case 2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DB Document 43 Filed 08/25/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation and Order (2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD)

Plaintiff Center for Competitive Politics and Defendant Attorney General Kamala D. 

Harris (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and 

agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on August 12, 2016, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint for 

Declaratory and Injunctive Relief;

WHEREAS, on or about August 19, 2016, Plaintiff will file a Motion for Preliminary 

Injunction, which will be heard on October 6, 2016, or on the earliest date thereafter that is 

convenient for the Court;

WHEREAS, by previous agreement of the parties, see ECF No. 34, Defendant’s last day 

to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint currently is September 2, 2016;

WHEREAS, in the interest of efficiency and economy, the Parties agree that Defendant’s

time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint should be extended until after the

resolution of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction;

WHEREAS, no previous extensions have been sought since the filing of Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint;

//

//

//

//

Case 2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DB Document 43 Filed 08/25/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Stipulation and Order (2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD)

THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 144 (a) and in consideration of the foregoing, it is 

hereby stipulated that:

Defendant’s last day to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended 

Complaint shall be no later than 21 days after entry of this Court’s order regarding the Motion for 

Preliminary Injunction.

Dated: August 19, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

TAMAR PACHTER

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

KEVIN A. CALIA

Deputy Attorney General

/s/ Alexandra Robert Gordon

ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Attorney General Harris

Dated: August 19, 2016 By: CENTER FOR COMPETITIVE POLITICS

/s/ Allen Dickerson

ALLEN DICKERSON*

Attorneys for Plaintiff Center For 

Competitive Politics

ORDER

HAVING CONSIDERED THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, AND GOOD CAUSE 

APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 24, 2016

Case 2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DB Document 43 Filed 08/25/16 Page 3 of 3