Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00569/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00569-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT BROWN, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0569 FCD EFB PS

vs.

OSCAR SALVATIERRA, JR., et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the

undersigned under Local Rule 72-302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 12,

2007, the court granted plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed plaintiff’s

complaint with leave to amend. The order explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff

thirty days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that

failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed. 

The thirty-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the order. 

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110. 

Case 2:07-cv-00569-FCD-EFB Document 4 Filed 06/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 4, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-00569-FCD-EFB Document 4 Filed 06/04/07 Page 2 of 2