Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_19-cv-05685/USCOURTS-azd-2_19-cv-05685-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 441
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Voting
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Voto Latino Foundation, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

Katie Hobbs,

Defendant.

No. CV-19-05685-PHX-DWL

ORDER 

On February 24, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation that Plaintiffs may file a 

Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) and that Defendant shall file a responsive pleading 

by March 20, 2020. (Doc. 20.) That same day, Plaintiffs filed the SAC. (Doc. 21.)

The pending motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (Doc. 17) is moot. 

Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997) 

(“[T]he amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as 

non-existent.”); A.R.D. v. Kerry, 2014 WL 12617410, *1 (D. Ariz. 2014) (denying 

motion to dismiss as moot after superseding amended complaint was filed).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation (Doc. 20) is granted. Defendant 

shall respond to the SAC by March 20, 2020. The motion to dismiss (Doc. 17) is denied 

as moot.

Dated this 26th day of February, 2020.

Case 2:19-cv-05685-DWL Document 24 Filed 02/26/20 Page 1 of 1