Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06014/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06014-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN VLASICH, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

A.K. SCRIBNER, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:03-cv-06014-OWW-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 26)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On April 26, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and

Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DENIED. This Report and Recommendation was served on all parties

and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within

thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. On May

23, 2005, Petitioner filed objections to the Report and

Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

Case 1:03-cv-06014-OWW -SMS Document 29 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the

Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed April 26, 2005, is

ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED;

3. The Clerk of Court ENTER judgment in favor of Respondent;

and,

4. Any and all pending motions and/or requests are DENIED as

MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06014-OWW -SMS Document 29 Filed 11/01/05 Page 2 of 2