Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-05378/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-05378-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REQUESTING STATUS UPDATE—No. C-02-05378 RMW

MAG

E-FILED on 3/19/08 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

PAUL NARVIOS,

Petitioner,

v.

A.A. LAMARQUE, Warden,

Respondent.

No. C-02-05378 RMW

ORDER REQUESTING STATUS UPDATE

On September 7, 2006, the court issued an order denying in part petitioner's request for a writ

of habeas corpus. It deferred, however, ruling on petitioner's Confrontation Clause claim to the

extent Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) may be applicable. The court instructed, 

After disposition of Whorton v. Bockting, the parties are to meet and confer regarding

whether further briefing is appropriate in light of Crawford. The parties are then to

file a joint statement with the court setting forth their decision and suggesting a

briefing schedule, if necessary. Alternatively, petitioner may at any time inform the

court that he does not wish to pursue a claim under Crawford, after which the court

will enter a final judgment in this action.

September 7, 2006 Order at 9. The Supreme Court issued its decision in Whorton v. Bockting, 127

S. Ct. 1173 (2007), on February 28, 2007. To date, the court has received neither a joint statement

by the parties nor any communication from petitioner informing the court that he does not wish to

pursue a claim under Crawford. 

Case 5:02-cv-05378-RMW Document 26 Filed 03/19/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REQUESTING STATUS UPDATE—No. C-02-05378 RMW

MAG 2

The court requests that the parties submit a joint status report regarding this action by March

26, 2008. If appropriate, the parties should set a briefing schedule, or, if petitioner has opted not to

further pursue this petition, he should so inform the court so that a final judgment may be entered.

DATED: 3/18/08

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:02-cv-05378-RMW Document 26 Filed 03/19/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER REQUESTING STATUS UPDATE—No. C-02-05378 RMW

MAG 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Petitioner:

Richard Such jsuch@comcast.net 

Counsel for Respondent

Catherine Amy Rivlin catherine.rivlin@doj.ca.gov 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 3/19/08 /s/ MAG 

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:02-cv-05378-RMW Document 26 Filed 03/19/08 Page 3 of 3