Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01329/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01329-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, )

) 2:06-cv-1329-GEB-KJM

)

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

v. ) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

) CONFERENCE

ANTHONY S. WONG and MANDY TANG )

WONG, )

)

Defendants. )

)

Plaintiff’s Status Report filed August 28, 2006, states that

“[a]ll named parties have been served, but have not answered.” (Pl.’s

Status Report at 2.) Nevertheless, Plaintiff’s Status Report

indicates that this action may be fully scheduled. Plaintiff has not

shown that the schedule he proposes should be adopted because

Plaintiff has not demonstrated he is authorized to litigate this

action other than by way of default proceedings. With the exception

of the tentative statement that “Plaintiff may submit a request for

Clerk’s Entry of Default if Defendant does not show or respond to

Plaintiff’s Complaint[,]” Plaintiff’s Status Report is devoid of any

discussion of default proceedings. (Id.) Since Plaintiff has not

Case 2:06-cv-01329-GEB -KJM Document 7 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

shown that he may litigate this action apart from compliance with

default procedures, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set

for September 11, 2006, is rescheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on

November 20, 2006. Plaintiff shall file a further status report no

later than November 6, 2006, in which he explains what he has done to

prosecute this action. If, when that filing is due, the status of

this action is the same as it is now, Plaintiff must also explain in

that filing why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to

prosecute it. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 1, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-01329-GEB -KJM Document 7 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 2