Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03072/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03072-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR 

FORD’S OPP. TO CLASS CERT. 

NO. 13-CV-3072-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053)

redwards@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

BRIAN C. ANDERSON (S.B. #126539) 

banderson@omm.com 

SCOTT M. HAMMACK (pro hac vice) 

shammack@omm.com 

DAVID R. DOREY (S.B. #286843) 

ddorey@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

1625 Eye Street, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20006-4001 

Tеlephone: (202) 383-5300 

Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER 

LITIGATION 

Case No. 3:13-CV-3072-EMC

CLASS ACTION 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR 

DEFENDANT FORD’S MEMORANDUM 

OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN 

SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS 

CERTIFICATION 

[N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-11] 

Hearing Date: May 26, 2016 

Time: 1:30 PM 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

Courtroom: 5 

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 218 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 6
- 1 - 

STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR 

FORD’S OPP. TO CLASS CERT. 

NO. 13-CV-3072-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR BRIEF 

IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO CLASS CERTIFICATION 

WHEREAS, the Third Amended Class Action Complaint filed in the above action 

includes 19 plaintiffs from 12 states, collectively stating 44 causes of action (Dkt. No. 183, 

October 13, 2015); 

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to allow Plaintiffs to file a 50-page Motion for Class 

Certification; in this stipulation, Ford anticipated that it would need an extension to the page limit 

but reserved its right to seek such an extension until it reviewed Plaintiffs’ brief (Dkt. No. 190, 

January 21, 2016); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a 50-page Motion for Class Certification accompanied by four 

expert reports and a 66-page attorney declaration (Dkt. No. 196, January 28, 2016); 

WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-3(a) provides that the brief or memorandum of points and 

authorities in opposition to a motion may not exceed 25 pages; 

WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-11 provides that a party can move to “exceed otherwise 

applicable page limitations;” 

WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-3 provides that “[a]ny evidentiary and procedural objections to 

the motion must be contained within the brief or memorandum;” 

WHEREAS, Ford anticipates that it will raise evidentiary objections to certain of the 

expert reports Plaintiffs submitted with their Motion for Class Certification; 

WHEREAS, Ford anticipates that it will need 75 pages to respond adequately to 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, which raises complex legal and factual issues related to 

the numerous plaintiffs and causes of action in this case; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed not to oppose Ford’s motion seeking to extend the 

page limit for its Opposition up to 75 pages; 

WHEREAS, execution of this stipulation is not a waiver of any claims or defenses 

Plaintiffs or Ford may otherwise have; 

WHEREAS, for the reasons set forth above, other materials properly before the Court, and 

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 218 Filed 03/10/16 Page 2 of 6
- 2 - 

STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR 

FORD’S OPP. TO CLASS CERT. 

NO. 13-CV-3072-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the record in this case, the parties agree that there is good cause to grant this stipulated request to 

extend the page limitation; 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Ford, through their 

counsel of record, pursuant to Local Rule 7-11 and subject to the approval of the Court, that Ford 

shall have leave to file a memorandum of points and authorities of no more than 75 pages in 

support of its Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, to be filed on or before 

March 15, 2016. 

 Dated: March 9, 2016 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

 By: /s/ Randall W. Edwards_ ___ 

 RANDALL W. EDWARDS 

RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053) 

redwards@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

BRIAN C. ANDERSON (S.B. # 126539) 

banderson@omm.com 

SCOTT M. HAMMACK (pro hac vice) 

shammack@omm.com 

DAVID R. DOREY (S.B. #286843) 

ddorey@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

1625 Eye Street, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20006-4001 

Tеlephone: (202) 383-5300 

Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 

 Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company 

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 218 Filed 03/10/16 Page 3 of 6
- 3 - 

STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR 

FORD’S OPP. TO CLASS CERT. 

NO. 13-CV-3072-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Dated: March 9, 2016 BARON & BUDD, P.C. 

 By: /s/ Roland Tellis_____________ 

 ROLAND TELLIS 

Roland Tellis (S.B. #186269) 

Mark Pifko (S.B. #228412) 

BARON & BUDD, P.C. 

15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1600 

Encino, California 91436 

Tel: (818) 839-2320 

Fax: (818) 986-9698 

rtellis@baronbudd.com 

mpifko@baronbudd.com 

Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) 

Catherine Y.N. Gannon (pro hac vice) 

Craig R. Spiegel (S.B. #122000) 

Tyler S. Weaver (pro hac vice) 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

1918 8th Avenue, Suite 3300 

Seattle, Washington 98101 

Tel: (206) 623-7292 

Fax: (206) 623-0594 

steve@hbsslaw.com 

craigs@hbsslaw.com 

tyler@hbsslaw.com 

catherineg@hbsslaw.com 

Adam J. Levitt (pro hac vice) 

GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 

30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1200 

Chicago, Illinois 60602 

Tel: (312) 214-0000 

Fax: (312) 214-0001 

alevitt@gelaw.com 

Joseph G. Sauder (pro hac vice) 

Matthew D. Schelkopf (pro hac vice) 

CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP 

One Haverford Centre 

361 West Lancaster Avenue 

Haverford, Pennsylvania 19041 

Tel: (610) 642-8500 

Fax: (610) 649-3633 

JGS@chimicles.com 

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 218 Filed 03/10/16 Page 4 of 6
- 4 - 

STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR 

FORD’S OPP. TO CLASS CERT. 

NO. 13-CV-3072-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Jeff D. Friedman (S.B. #173886) 

Shana E. Scarlett (S.B. #217895) 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 

Berkeley, California 94710 

Tel: (510) 725-3000 

Fax: (510) 725-3001 

jefff@hbsslaw.com 

shanas@hbsslaw.com 

Jason A. Zweig (pro hac vice) 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

555 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1700 

New York, New York 10017 

Tel.: (212) 752-5455 

Fax: (917) 210-3980 

jasonz@hbsslaw.com 

Kyle J. McGee (pro hac vice) 

GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 

123 Justison Street 

Wilmington, Delaware 19801 

Tel.: (302) 622-7000 

Fax: (302) 622-7100 

kmcgee@gelaw.com 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class

 

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 218 Filed 03/10/16 Page 5 of 6
- 5 - 

STIP. TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR 

FORD’S OPP. TO CLASS CERT. 

NO. 13-CV-3072-EMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FILER’S ATTESTATION 

 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose 

behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. 

Dated: March 9, 2016 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

 

 By: _/s/ Randall W. Edwards_______ 

 RANDALL W. EDWARDS 

 Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Having reviewed the foregoing stipulated request, other matters properly before the Court, 

and the record in this case, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant 

Ford Motor Company shall have 75 pages for its Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class 

Certification. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March ___, 2016 ______________________________ 

 The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

 United States District Judge 

50 10

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-03072-EMC Document 218 Filed 03/10/16 Page 6 of 6