Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01939/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01939-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulated Briefing Schedule for State of California’s Response to Complaint (2:14-cv-01939-TLN-CKD)

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

SARA J. DRAKE

Senior Assistant Attorney General

NEIL D. HOUSTON, State Bar No. 168058

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 322-5476

Fax: (916) 327-2319

E-mail: Neil.Houston@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendant, State of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE ESTOM YUMEKA MAIDU TRIBE 

OF THE ENTERPRISE RANCHERIA, 

CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant.

No. 2:14-cv-01939-TLN-CKD

STIPULATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

FOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA’S 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

Judge: The Honorable Troy L. Nunley

Trial Date: None Set

Action Filed: 8/20/2014

Previous stipulations or extensions: none

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of 

the Enterprise Rancheria (Enterprise), and Defendant State of California (State), through their 

respective counsels of record, as follows:

1) The due date for the State’s response to Enterprise’s Complaint (Doc. 1), filed August 

20, 2014 (Complaint), shall be extended as provided herein.

2) The due date for the State’s motion to dismiss the Complaint shall be extended by 28 

days, from September 17, 2014, to October 15, 2014.

Case 2:14-cv-01939-TLN-CKD Document 6 Filed 09/15/14 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulated Briefing Schedule for State of California’s Response to Complaint (2:14-cv-01939-TLN-CKD)

3) Enterprise’s opposition to the State’s motion to dismiss the Complaint shall be due 28 

days thereafter, on November 12, 2014.

4) The State’s reply to Enterprise’s opposition to the State’s motion to dismiss the 

Complaint shall be due 14 days thereafter, on November 26, 2014.

5) The State’s motion to dismiss the Complaint shall be heard on December 11, 2014, at 

2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard in Courtroom 2 of the above captioned 

court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: September 11, 2014 Respectfully submitted,

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

SARA J. DRAKE

Senior Assistant Attorney General

/s/ NEIL D. HOUSTON

NEIL D. HOUSTON

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 2:14-cv-01939-TLN-CKD Document 6 Filed 09/15/14 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Stipulated Briefing Schedule for State of California’s Response to Complaint (2:14-cv-01939-TLN-CKD)

Dated: September 10, 2014 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING

HALE AND DORR LLP

/s/ CHRISTOPHER E. BABBITT (as 

authorized by counsel on 9/10/14)

CHRISTOPHER E. BABBITT

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: September 10, 2014 MAIER PFEFFER KIM GEARY &

COHEN LLP

/s/ JOHN A. MAIER (as authorized by 

counsel on 9/10/14)

JOHN A. MAIER

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 11, 2014

Case 2:14-cv-01939-TLN-CKD Document 6 Filed 09/15/14 Page 3 of 3