Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04488/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04488-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The motion reflects a new address for plaintiff, and the Clerk has amended the docket

to reflect such change of address.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN L. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JESUS A. GARCIA, et al.,

Defendants. _______________________________ 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. C 06-4488 MMC (PR) 

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO

COMPEL; GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART MOTION

TO ENTER RECORDS AND TO

CHANGE ADDRESS

(Docket Nos. 8, 9, 10)

Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled civil rights

action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants have recently been granted an extension of time

in which to file a dispositive motion. 

Now before the Court are plaintiff’s motions to compel discovery from defendants

(Docket Nos. 9 and 10). Plaintiff may file a motion to compel discovery only after he

satisfies the “meet and confer” requirements of the discovery rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

37(a)(2)(A); L. R. 37-1(a). It is clear from plaintiff’s motions that he has not done so. 

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motions to compel are hereby DENIED.

Also before the Court is plaintiff’s “Motion to Enter into Records Documentary

Evidence” (Docket No. 8), to which plaintiff has attached various prison records.1

 Plaintiff

provides no explanation in said motion as to the relevance of any such records to plaintiff’s

Case 3:06-cv-04488-MMC Document 15 Filed 04/11/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

claims, let alone whether they pertain to any motion filed under the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure or their admissibility under the Federal Rules of Evidence. Consequently,

plaintiff’s request to “enter” said records is hereby DENIED. 

This order terminates Docket Nos 8, 9, and 10.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 11, 2007

_____________________________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-04488-MMC Document 15 Filed 04/11/07 Page 2 of 2