Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03926/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03926-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT 

VEOH NETWORKS, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE 

C-06-3926 (HRL) 

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Dean A. Morehous (CA Bar No. 111841) dam@thelenreid.com

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

101 Second Street 

Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 371-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 371-1211 

Michael S. Elkin (pro hac vice pending) melkin@thelenreid.com

Paul M. Fakler (pro hac vice pending) pfakler@thelenreid.com

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

875 Third Avenue 

New York, New York 10022 

Telephone: (212) 603-2000 

Facsimile: (212) 603-2001 

Attorneys for Defendant 

VEOH NETWORKS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IO GROUP, INC., a California Corporation 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

VEOH NETWORKS, Inc., a California 

Corporation, 

Defendant. 

 Case No.: C06-3926 (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

FOR DEFENDANT VEOH NETWORKS, 

INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-2, Plaintiff IO Group, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and 

Defendant VEOH Networks, Inc. (“Defendant”), hereby stipulate that Defendant shall have an 

extension of time, until Monday, September 25, 2006, to file its Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to 

Consolidate. This extension will have no effect on any of the other dates currently scheduled in 

this action. 

*E-FILED ON 9/14/06*

Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL Document 12 Filed 09/14/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT 

VEOH NETWORKS, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE 

C-06-3926 (HRL) 

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

This brief extension of time was necessitated by the very recent retention of Thelen Reid & 

Priest by defendant and the subsequent substitution of counsel. One previous extension has been 

sought, stipulated to and ordered in this matter, extending defendant’s time to answer plaintiff’s 

complaint until Monday, September 25, 2006. 

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: September 12, 2006 THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

 /s/ Dean A. Morehous 

 Dean A. Morehous 

 Michael S. Elkin (pro hac vice pending) 

 Paul M. Fakler (pro hac vice pending) 

 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 VEOH NETWORKS, INC. 

Dated: September 12, 2006 THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN 

Gill Sperlein 

 /s/ Gill Sperlein 

GILL SPERLEIN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IO GROUP, INC. 

I, Dean A. Morehous, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto. 

 /s/ Dean A. Morehous 

Dean A. Morehous 

Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL Document 12 Filed 09/14/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT 

VEOH NETWORKS, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE 

C-06-3926 (HRL) 

THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________________ 

 HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

September 14, 2006

Case 5:06-cv-03926-HRL Document 12 Filed 09/14/06 Page 3 of 3