Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00133/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00133-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [] Order for Extension of Time

Case No. C08 00133 RMW (RS)

- 1 -

Henry C. Su (SBN 211202; suh@howrey.com)

Katharine L. Altemus (SBN 227080; altemusk@howrey.com)

HOWREY LLP

1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor

East Palo Alto, California 94303

Telephone: (650) 798-3500

Facsimile: (650) 798-3600

Robert Ruyak

Matthew Wolf

Marc Cohn

HOWREY LLP

1229 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: (202) 783-0800

Facsimile: (202) 383-6610

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC CORP. and HOLOGIC L.P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC CORPORATION, 

and HOLOGIC L.P.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

SENORX, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. C08 00133 RMW (RS)

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO 

RESPOND TO SENORX, INC.’S MOTION 

TO STRIKE 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

*E-FILED - 4/10/08*

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW Document 86 Filed 04/10/08 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [ Order to Extend Time

Case No. C08 00133 RMW (RS)

- 2 -

STIPULATION

The parties, through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to, and respectfully 

request that this Court, pursuant to L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, grant Plaintiffs a three day extension of time to 

respond to Defendant’s Objections to and Motion to Strike Certain Portions of the Declaration of 

Glenn Magnuson in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 51-6). Under a 

granted extension of time, Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Strike would be filed on or 

before April 10, 2008 instead of April 7, 2008, in conjunction with Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiffs seek this extension of time because they are 

currently focused on obtaining discovery to be used in the preparation of their Reply. If granted, the 

proposed modification maintains the standard briefing schedule under the Civil Local Rules for 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction but would allow briefing on an ancillary motion (i.e., 

Defendant’s Motion to Strike) to be completed outside the standard schedule.

Other time modifications previously proposed or granted in this case include: (1) the parties 

jointly stipulated to an extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ initial Complaint; (2) 

the Court granted Plaintiffs additional time to file an Amended Complaint; (3) the parties jointly 

stipulated to an extension of time for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ 

Amended Complaint; (4) the Court modified the briefing schedule for Defendant’s Opposition and 

Plaintiffs’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ pending Motion for Preliminary Injunction. 

Dated: April 2, 2008 By: /s/Katharine Altemus

Katharine Altemus

HOWREY LLP

1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor

East Palo Alto, California 94303

Telephone: (650) 798-3500

Attorney for Plaintiffs Hologic, Inc., Cytyc 

Corporation, and Hologic, L.P.

Dated: April 2, 2008 By: /s/ Aaron P. Maurer (w/ permission)

Aaron P. Maurer

WILLIAMS & CONOLLY LLP

725 Twelfth St. NW

Washington DC 20005

Telephone: (202) 434-5000

Attorneys for Defendant SenoRx Inc.

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW Document 86 Filed 04/10/08 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [ Order to Extend Time

Case No. C08 00133 RMW (RS)

- 3 -

Filer’s Attestation

I, Katharine Altemus, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file this Stipulation to Extend Time. Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from Aaron 

P. Maurer.

Dated: April 2, 2008 By: /s/ Katharine Altemus

Katharine Altemus

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW Document 86 Filed 04/10/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [] Order to Extend Time

Case No. C08 00133 RMW (RS)

- 4 -

[] ORDER

Based on the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that the 

Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant’s Objections to and Motion to Strike 

Certain Portions of the Declaration of Glenn Magnuson in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition no later than April 10, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Court Judge

Dated: 4/10/08

Case 5:08-cv-00133-RMW Document 86 Filed 04/10/08 Page 4 of 4