Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01247/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01247-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS HENDON, 

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

BAROYA, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:05-cv-01247-AWI-GSA-PC

 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 142.)

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT 

GRIFFIN FROM THIS ACTION UNDER 

RULE 25

I. BACKGROUND

Carlos Hendon ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 

action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on 

September 30, 2005. (Doc. 1.) This action now proceeds on Plaintiff's Second Amended 

Complaint filed on June 26, 2008, against defendants Baroya, Pham, Nguyet, Hoppe, Griffin 

and Reidman (“Defendants”) for subjecting him to cruel and unusual punishment in violation 

of the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. 18.)

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 24, 2014, the Court entered Findings and 

Recommendations, recommending that defendant Griffin be dismissed from this action under 

Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 142.) The parties were provided an 

Case 1:05-cv-01247-SAB Document 145 Filed 01/09/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

opportunity to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations within thirty days. To 

date, no objections have been filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 

analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

November 24, 2014, are ADOPTED in full;

2. Defendant Griffin is DISMISSED from this action under Rule 25 of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure; and

3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to reflect the dismissal of defendant Griffin from this 

action on the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01247-SAB Document 145 Filed 01/09/15 Page 2 of 2