Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01038/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01038-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IRWIN DOUGLAS,

No. CIV 09-1038 FCD EFB PS

Plaintiff,

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., 

ORDER

Defendants.

___________________________/

This action is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local

Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 12, 2010, plaintiff filed a “declaration

and motion to throw out and disregard defendants’ supplemental disclosure of evidence.” Dckt.

No. 35. Because the evidence plaintiff challenges is not being considered by the court at this

time, plaintiff’s motion is premature and is therefore denied without prejudice. If the evidence at

issue is offered by defendants in support of a motion for summary judgment or is listed as

evidence to be offered at trial, plaintiff may raise his objections to the evidence at the appropriate

time. 

DATED: May 20, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-01038-KJM-EFB Document 37 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 1