Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01162/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01162-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS V. HELEAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1162 LKK EFB P

vs.

D. HAWLEY, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He filed his complaint on May 30, 2006. On August 30, 2006, the court

found that the complaint stated a cognizable claim as to defendant D. Hawley but not as to any

other defendant. The court gave plaintiff 20 days (i.e., until September 19, 2006) to submit

materials for service of process on defendant D. Hawley or, alternatively, 30 days (i.e., until

September 29, 2006) to file a first-amended complaint.

The times for acting have passed and plaintiff has not submitted the materials necessary

to serve process on defendant D. Hawley, nor has he filed an amended complaint or otherwise

responded to the August 30, 2006, order.

////

////

Case 2:06-cv-01162-LKK -EFB Document 12 Filed 10/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 17, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-01162-LKK -EFB Document 12 Filed 10/18/06 Page 2 of 2