Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-02145/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-02145-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE J. MONTIEL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

YATES, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:11cv02145 LJO DLB PC

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO CORRECT DATES

(Document 24)

Plaintiff Jesse J. Montiel (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.1983. This action is proceeding on 

Plaintiff’s December 28, 2011, complaint for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need 

violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Green, Taher-Pour, Wilson, Das and 

Wynn.

Defendants Taher-Pour and Wilson filed their answer on June 24, 2013. The remaining 

three Defendants have not yet been served.

On July 3, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to correct dates in Paragraphs 19 and 21 of his 

complaint. Defendants did not file an opposition.

DISCUSSION

Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend the party’s 

pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served. 

Case 1:11-cv-02145-LJO-DLB Document 33 Filed 08/07/13 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Otherwise, a party may amend only by leave of the court or by written consent of the adverse 

party, and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 15(a). “Rule 

15(a) is very liberal and leave to amend ‘shall be freely given when justice so requires.’” 

AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. Dialysis West, Inc., 465 F.3d 946, 951 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)). However, courts “need not grant leave to amend where the amendment: 

(1) prejudices the opposing party; (2) is sought in bad faith; (3) produces an undue delay in the 

litigation; or (4) is futile.” Id. The factor of “‘[u]ndue delay by itself . . . is insufficient to justify 

denying a motion to amend.’” Owens v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., 244 F.3d 708, 

712-13 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting Bowles v. Reade, 198 F.3d 752, 757-58 (9th Cir. 1999)). In this 

case, a responsive pleading has been served. Therefore, Plaintiff may not file an amended 

complaint without leave of the court.

Here, Plaintiff seeks to change a time-frame referred to in Paragraph 19 from “1 year” to 

“7.5 months.” He also seeks to change a date in Paragraph 21 from “November 26, 2010” to 

“November 19, 2010.” Plaintiff states that he inadvertently included the incorrect dates and 

discovered the correct dates through a response from Defendants.

The Court finds that allowing Plaintiff to amend the dates described above would not 

prejudice Defendants, would not result in undue delay and would not be futile. There is also no 

indication that Plaintiff seeks to amend in bad faith.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to amend is GRANTED. Plaintiff must file a complete, 

amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order. Plaintiff is 

reminded that these are the only changes that he may make, and that his amended complaint 

should only reference the Eighth Amendment claim that has been found cognizable. Plaintiff is 

further reminded that an amended complaint supercedes the original complaint, Lacey v. 

Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 907 n.1 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc), and it must be “complete in 

itself without reference to the prior or superceded pleading.” Local Rule 220. 

Case 1:11-cv-02145-LJO-DLB Document 33 Filed 08/07/13 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendants may file a responsive pleading within thirty (30) days of the date of service of 

the First Amended Complaint, or they may notify the Court that they wish to stand on their June 

4, 2013, answer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 7, 2013 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

3b142a

Case 1:11-cv-02145-LJO-DLB Document 33 Filed 08/07/13 Page 3 of 3