Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03278/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03278-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAM RITHY,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-3278 GGH P

vs.

CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC, et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed December 23, 2009, petitioner’s application was dismissed and

twenty-eight days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. The twenty-eight day

period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an amended application or otherwise

responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district

judge to this case.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:09-cv-03278-GEB-GGH Document 6 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 3, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/rithy3278.fta

Case 2:09-cv-03278-GEB-GGH Document 6 Filed 03/03/10 Page 2 of 2