Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-1_09-cv-00024/USCOURTS-almd-1_09-cv-00024-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MOBILE ATTIC, INC., )

MA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, )

INC., and BAGLEY FAMILY )

REVOCABLE TRUST, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. )

)

PETER L. CASH, CASH BROTHERS )

LEASING, INC., BRIDGEVILLE )

TRAILERS, INC., and BARFIELD, )

MURPHY, SHANK & SMITH, P.C., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________ CIVIL ACT. NO. 1:09cv24-MHT

 (WO)

NATIONAL SECURITY GROUP, INC., )

)

Intervenor Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

PETER L. CASH, BARFIELD, )

MURPHY, SHANK & SMITH, P.C., )

MOBILE ATTIC, INC., and BAGLEY )

FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST, )

)

Intervenor Defendants. )

OPINION and ORDER

Now pending before the court is the Bagley Family Trust’s motion for summary

judgment (doc. # 164) and Mobile Attic’s motion for summary judgment (doc. # 165). The

Bagley Family Trust and Mobile Attic seek summary judgment on count five of the

intervenor complaint which is a claim of unjust enrichment. In response to the motions for

Case 1:09-cv-00024-MHT-CSC Document 202 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 2
summary judgment and during the pretrial conference held on May 17, 2012, the parties

agreed that count five of the intervenor complaint is due to be dismissed. See Doc. # 173 at

3; Doc. # 186 at 3-4, 27. 

The parties have also settled count three of the Bagley Family Trust and Mobile

Attic’s amended complaint (doc. # 91) with defendant Barfield, Murphy, Shank & Smith,

P.C.

***

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Bagley Family Trust’s motion for summary judgment on count five of the

intervenor complaint (doc. # 164) and Mobile Attic’s motion for summary judgment (doc.

# 165) are granted as to count five of the amended intervenor complaint, and said count is

dismissed with prejudice. Said summary-judgment motions remain pending in all other

respects.

2. Count three of the amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice, and

Barfield, Murphy, Shank & Smith, P.C. is dismissed and completely terminated as a party

in this action.

Done, this the 18th day of May, 2012.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00024-MHT-CSC Document 202 Filed 05/18/12 Page 2 of 2