Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00664/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00664-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRADLEY JAMES MROZEK,

Plaintiff,

v.

PATRICK EATON, et al.,

 Defendants.

No. 1:24-cv-00664-KES-SAB (PC)

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW 

CAUSE 

(ECF No. 22) 

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. 

On October 7, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff first amended complaint, found no 

cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff one final opportunity to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 

21.) Plaintiff failed file an amended complaint within the allotted time frame. Therefore, on 

November 18, 2024, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the action should 

not be dismissed. (ECF No. 22.) On December 6, 2024, Plaintiff filed a second amended 

complaint. (ECF No. 23.) Inasmuch as Plaintiff has now filed a second amended complaint, the 

Court will discharge the order to show cause. However, Plaintiff is advised that any future failure 

to comply timely to court orders may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of 

the action. 

Case 1:24-cv-00664-KES-SAB Document 24 Filed 12/09/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court’s November 18, 2024, order to show cause is DISCHARGED; and

2. The Court will screen Plaintiff’s second amended complaint in due course. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 9, 2024 

STANLEY A. BOONE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:24-cv-00664-KES-SAB Document 24 Filed 12/09/24 Page 2 of 2