Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00519/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00519-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK SISNEROZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

WHITMAN, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 05 00519 AWI LJO P

ORDER CONSTRUING “MOTION OF

RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO

MAGISTRATE ORDER” AS MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION (Doc. 14.) 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION (Doc. 14.) 

 Frank Sisneroz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On August 4,2005, this Court issued an Order severing Plaintiff’s claims as they were

contained in a Complaint with numerous Plaintiff’s. Plaintiff was also ordered to file an

Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of service of the Order. 

On August 30, 2005, Plaintiff filed a pleading titled “Motion of Response and Objection

to Magistrate Order.” The District Court denied the Motion as a Motion for Reconsideration and

denied the request. To date, no Amended Complaint has been filed. Accordingly, the Court

HEREBY ORDERS Plaintiff SHALL SHOW CAUSE within thirty days of the date of service of

this Order why the action should not be dismissed for his failure to file an Amended Complaint

as ordered by the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00519-AWI-GSA Document 19 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 1