Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04065/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04065-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7391264.2

STIP AND [PRPD] ORDER EXT DEFTS’ 

TIME TO RESP TO CLASS ACTION 

CMPLT, EST SCHED, AND CONT INIT CMC 1 USDC Case No. C 06-4065 MJJ 

FRANKLIN B. GOWDY (SBN 47918) 

MICHAEL J. LAWSON (SBN 66547) 

JOSEPH E. FLOREN (SBN 168292) 

BENJAMIN P. SMITH (SBN 197551) 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

E-mail: fgowdy@morganlewis.com

 michael.lawson@morganlewis.com

 jfloren@morganlewis.com

 bpsmith@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant KLA-Tencor Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ROBERT L. GARBER, on behalf of 

himself and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, 

EDWARD W. BARNHOLT, H. 

RAYMOND BINGHAM, ROBERT T. 

BOND, RICHARD J. ELKUS, JR., 

STEPHEN P. KAUFMAN, JOHN H. 

KISPERT, KENNETH LEVY, KENNETH 

L. SCHROEDER, JON D. TOMPKINS 

and LIDA URBANEK, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 06-4065 MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ 

TIME TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT, ESTABLISHING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

RESPONSIVE MOTION(S), AND 

CONTINUING INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 5-1 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 7 Filed 07/28/06 Page 1 of 4
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7391264.2

STIP AND [PRPD] ORDER EXT DEFTS’ 

TIME TO RESP TO CLASS ACTION 

CMPLT, EST SCHED, AND CONT INIT CMC 2 USDC Case No. C 06-4065 MJJ 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Robert L. Garber, on behalf of himself and all others similarly 

situated, filed a securities class action complaint on or about June 29, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines 

in this case scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference for October 3, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served a summons and copy of the complaint on Defendant KLATencor Corporation on or about July 11, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff anticipates that additional plaintiffs will seek to join this action 

and/or will file separate class actions asserting substantially the same claims against substantially 

the same defendants named in this action and that these actions will be consolidated before this 

Court and an amended consolidated complaint filed; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and his counsel intend to file a motion to be appointed lead plaintiff, 

and lead plaintiff’s counsel, respectively, pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform 

Act; 

WHEREAS, Defendants have requested an extension of time to respond to the class 

action complaint until a reasonable time after motions for consolidation and appointment of a lead 

plaintiff are decided; 

WHEREAS, Defendants intend to file motion(s) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act in response to the complaint or any 

consolidated complaint; 

WHEREAS, Local Rule 16-2(e) requires Court approval of any stipulation to vary the 

date of a Case Management Conference; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between 

the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant KLA-Tencor Corporation, as follows: 

1. The time for all defendants to respond to the complaint shall be extended until 

thirty (30) days after the Court’s ruling appointing a lead plaintiff and lead plaintiff’s counsel. If 

an amended and/or consolidated complaint is thereafter filed, then defendants’ response to the 

complaint shall be due thirty (30) days after the service of such amended and/or consolidated 

complaint. Plaintiff agrees not to treat any failure to respond by any defendant before this time as 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 5-1 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 7 Filed 07/28/06 Page 2 of 4
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7391264.2

STIP AND [PRPD] ORDER EXT DEFTS’ 

TIME TO RESP TO CLASS ACTION 

CMPLT, EST SCHED, AND CONT INIT CMC 3 USDC Case No. C 06-4065 MJJ 

a default. 

2. Once defendants respond to the complaint by filing Rule 12 motion(s), Plaintiff 

will have 30 calendar days to file and serve any opposition to the motion(s) and defendants will 

have 15 calendar days to file and serve any reply briefs in further support of the motion(s). The 

hearing date for the Rule 12 motion(s) will be determined by the Court. 

3. The Initial Case Management Conference currently set for October 3, 2006 will be 

continued to the date to be set by the Court approximately 30 days after the hearing on the Rule 

12 motion(s). All other deadlines set forth in the Order Setting Initial Case Management 

Conference and ADR deadlines are continued accordingly. 

 

Dated: July _____, 2006 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

By 

Joseph E. Floren 

Attorneys for Defendant KLA-Tencor 

Corporation 

Dated: July _____, 2006 GREEN WELLING LLP 

By 

Robert S. Green 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

1. The time for all defendants to respond to the complaint shall be extended until 

thirty (30) days after the Court’s ruling appointing a lead plaintiff and lead plaintiff’s counsel. If 

an amended and/or consolidated complaint is thereafter filed, then defendants’ response to the 

complaint shall be due thirty (30) days after the service of such amended and/or consolidated 

complaint. 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 5-1 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 3 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 7 Filed 07/28/06 Page 3 of 4
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7391264.2

STIP AND [PRPD] ORDER EXT DEFTS’ 

TIME TO RESP TO CLASS ACTION 

CMPLT, EST SCHED, AND CONT INIT CMC 4 USDC Case No. C 06-4065 MJJ 

2. After the filing of defendants’ responsive motion(s), Plaintiff will have 30 calendar 

days to file and serve any opposition to the motion(s) and defendants will have 15 calendar days 

to file and serve any reply briefs in further support of the motion(s). 

3. The Initial Case Management Conference scheduled in this action for October 3, 

2006 is continued to the date to be set by the Court approximately 30 days after the hearing on the 

defendants’ responsive motion(s). All other deadlines set forth in the Order Setting Initial Case 

Management Conference and ADR deadlines are continued accordingly. 

Dated: July _____, 2006 By 

Hon. Martin J. Jenkins 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-04065-MJJ Document 5-1 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 4 of 4

31

Case 3:06-cv-04065-CRB Document 7 Filed 07/28/06 Page 4 of 4