Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02151/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02151-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THE ESTATE OF PABLO GARCIA TORIBIO, ET AL., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, ET AL., 

Defendants.

CASE NO. 18-cv-02151-YGR 

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSIVE 

SEPARATE STATEMENT AND SEPARATE 

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL 

FACTS 

 The Court STRIKES Plaintiffs’ filings at Docket Nos. 66 and 67. The Court’s Standing Order 

provides, in pertinent part: 

2. Responsive Separate Statement: The papers opposing a motion for summary 

judgment shall include one Responsive Separate Statement which: (1) incorporates 

the facts in the moving separate statement; (2) provides a response to each of the 

facts in the correspondingly numbered paragraph in the moving separate statement; 

and (3) identifies any additional material facts that the party contends will establish 

a genuine issue to be tried. This Responsive Separate Statement shall indicate as to 

each fact whether the party contends the fact is “disputed” or “undisputed.” If the 

opposing party contends that the fact is in dispute, the party must cite to evidence in 

the record which establishes the dispute. 

3. Page Limits for Separate Statements: Unless a party has obtained prior 

permission from this Court, the Supporting Separate Statement is limited to no more 

than fifteen (15) pages, and the Responsive Separate Statement is limited to no more 

than five (5) additional pages beyond the number of pages in the opening statement. 

4. Attestation Required for Separate Statements: The Supporting and Responsive 

Separate Statement each must be signed by counsel (or by the party, if 

unrepresented by counsel) who has reviewed the document and can attest as follows: 

“I attest that the evidence cited herein fairly and accurately supports [or disputes] 

the facts as asserted.”

Standing Order In Civil Cases ¶ 9(c)(2)-(4). Plaintiffs here filed a 15-page response to defendant’s 

separate statement (Dkt. No. 66) as well as a separate document with 8 pages of additional facts 

(Dkt. No. 67). Further, the separate document stating additional facts did not include the required 

attestation. 

Case 4:18-cv-02151-YGR Document 68 Filed 02/04/19 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

 Plaintiffs shall refile a responsive separate statement in compliance with the Court’s Standing 

Order no later than February 6, 2019. Plaintiffs are cautioned that future violations of the Court’s 

Standing Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 4, 2019 

_______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:18-cv-02151-YGR Document 68 Filed 02/04/19 Page 2 of 2