Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00654/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00654-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Tyre’Id O.I. Hodges is appearing in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant 

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 28, 2016, findings and recommendations issued recommending granting 

in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff filed objections to the

findings and recommendations on August 15, 2016. On August 24, 2016, counsel was appointed for 

Plaintiff for the limited purpose of settlement in this action; and Plaintiff filed additional objections to 

the findings and recommendations. Defendants filed objections to the findings and recommendations 

on August 26, 2016. On September 8, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to strike Defendants’ objections 

to the findings and recommendations. On October 28, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for emergency 

injunctive relief. 

While Plaintiff entitles his motion as a motion for emergency injunctive relief, it is merely 

raising the issues that are currently before the district court on the findings and recommendations. 

Therefore, the Court construes the motion as an additional objection to the findings and 

TYRE’ID O.I. HODGES,

Plaintiff,

v.

JERALD SHARON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00654-DAD-SAB (PC)

ORDER CONSTRUING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AS OBJECTIONS TO 

THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

AND DISREGARD AS UNTIMELY

(ECF No. 68)

Case 1:13-cv-00654-DAD-SAB Document 70 Filed 10/31/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

recommendations and it shall be disregarded as untimely filed and duplicative of the two prior 

objections that have been filed. 

Plaintiff is advised that he has now been appointed counsel in this action for the settlement 

conference only and a settlement conference has been scheduled for November 29, 2016. 

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for emergency 

injunctive relief is construed as additional objections to the findings and recommendations and is 

DISREGARDED as untimely filed. Plaintiff is advised that no further filings of this nature that are 

duplicative of the issues currently pending resolution on the findings and recommendations will be 

considered and will be stricken if filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00654-DAD-SAB Document 70 Filed 10/31/16 Page 2 of 2