Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03607/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03607-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 8:1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing

---

Stipulation for Extension, Case No. C 07-3607 EDL 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Carrie Rosenbaum, Cal. Bar #236582 

Jewish Family & Children's Services 

2534 Judah Street 

San Francisco, CA 94122 

Tel. (415) 449-2900 

Fax (415) 449-2901 

Email: CarrieR@jfcs.org

Attorney for Victor Volovnikov 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Victor Volovnikov, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Department of Homeland Security, 

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary; US 

Attorney General, MICHAEL MUKASEY; 

United States Citizenship and Immigration 

Services, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, 

Director; United States Citizenship and 

Immigration Services, ALFONSO 

AGUILAR, Chief; United States 

Citizenship and Immigration Services, 

ROSEMARY MELVILLE, District 

Director 

 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil No. C 07-3607 EDL 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

WITHIN WHICH THE PLAINTIFF 

MUST FILE AN OPPOSITION TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

 Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their 

attorney of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 30-day extension of 

time within which the Plaintiff must file his Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Remand in the 

above-entitled action. Plaintiff respectfully makes this request because of recent transition of 

staff at the nonprofit organization of which she is the new supervising attorney. She and the 

Case 3:07-cv-03607-EDL Document 14 Filed 12/04/07 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation for Extension, Case No. C 07-3607 EDL 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

other attorney are new as of September and October 2007, respectively, and replaced the 

previous two attorneys. The recent staff transitions combined with the very large caseload at the 

agency have necessitated Counsel for Plaintiff’s request for more time to file the Opposition. 

Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be due January 8, 2008, and Defendants’ Reply shall be due January 

15, 2008. 

Dated: December 4, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

 

 CARRIE ROSENBAUM 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: 

 MELANIE PROCTOR 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 

ORDER 

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: 

 Elizabeth D. Laporte 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

December 4, 2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:07-cv-03607-EDL Document 14 Filed 12/04/07 Page 2 of 2