Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01101/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01101-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HECTOR GARZA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

M.S. EVANS, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-01101-AWI-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 19)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW PETITION (Doc. 18)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On May 3, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that Petitioner's motion to withdraw his petition

be GRANTED, and the instant petition be DISMISSED, without

prejudice. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. To

date, the parties have not filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

Case 1:05-cv-01101-AWI-DLB Document 20 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 3, 2006, are

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Petitioner's motion to withdraw his petition, filed April

4, 2006, is GRANTED;

3. The instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

therefore DISMISSED, without prejudice; 

4. All pending motions are DENIED as moot; and

5. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01101-AWI-DLB Document 20 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2