Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20451/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20451-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Property Damage

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

EMPAK, INC.; EMTRAK, INC.; JENOPTIK AG; 

JENOPTIK INFAB, INC.; and MEISSNER + 

WURST GmbH, 

 Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 98-20451 JF 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO 

FILE CERTAIN EXHIBITS UNDER 

SEAL IN CONNECTION WITH 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO 

WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 

RULES 79-5 AND 7-11

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Date: September 8, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: 3 

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

ADMIN RELIEF TO FILE CERTAIN EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL

CASE NO. 98-20451 JF

DM_US\8373552.v1 

HOWREY LLP [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

**E-filed 8/9/06**

Case 5:98-cv-20451-JF Document 827 Filed 08/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Defendants Jenoptik AG, Jenoptik Infab, Inc., and Emtrak, Inc. have filed a Motion for 

Administrative Relief pursuant to Civil Local Rules 79-5(b) and (c) and 7-11 for permission to file 

under seal the following exhibits:

1. Exhibits C (Asyst Technologies, Inc.’s Supplemental Responses To Defendants’ First 

Set Of Interrogatories dated October 13, 1998), F (documents produced by plaintiff in this litigation 

bearing Bates numbers ATI 088129 and ATI 088130), and I (Asyst Technologies, Inc.’s Responses To 

Defendants’ First Set Of Interrogatories dated August 3, 1998) to the Declaration of Daniel T. 

Shvodian In Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement. 

After considering the requesting papers and all other matters presented to the Court, and 

finding good cause therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. 

Dated: 

 The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

 United States District Judge 

Submitted August 4, 2006 by: 

HOWREY LLP 

By: /s/ Daniel T. Shvodian 

Daniel T. Shvodian 

Henry C. Bunsow 

James F. Valentine 

David L. Bilsker 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JENOPTIK AG, JENOPTIK INFAB, INC., 

EMTRAK, INC., and MEISSNER + WURST GmbH 

8373552

ADMIN RELIEF TO FILE CERTAIN EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL

CASE NO. 98-20451 JF

DM_US\8373552.v1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR -1- HOWREY LLP

9/8/06

Case 5:98-cv-20451-JF Document 827 Filed 08/09/06 Page 2 of 2