Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01657/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01657-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Jeffrey Marshall,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1657 DFL PAN P

vs. Order

Solano County Sheriff, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and

26-36, the following provisions shall govern discovery in this

action.

1. Discovery requests shall be served by the parties

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 and Local Rule

5-135 and shall be filed only when required by Local Rules

30-250(a), 33-250(c), 34-250(c) and 36-250(c).

2. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due 45

days after the request is served.

Case 2:04-cv-01657-AK Document 41 Filed 08/24/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. Defendants may examine at deposition plaintiff and any

other prisoner provided that at least 14 days before such

examination, defendants serve all parties with the notice

required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(1).

4. If disputes arise about the parties' discovery

obligations, the parties shall comply with Rules 5, 7, 11, 26,

and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules 5-134,

5-135, 6-136, 7-130, 7-131, 7-132, 11-110, 43-140, and 78-230(m)

of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District

Court, Eastern District of California. Unless otherwise ordered,

Local Rule 37-251 shall not apply. 

5. Filing a discovery motion that does not comply with all

applicable rules may result in imposition of sanctions including

but not limited to denial of the motion.

6. Good cause appearing, the July 7, 2005, findings and

recommendations are vacated. Defendants Cullinson, Castro,

Molloy and Headley answered August 12, 2005. Plaintiff must

ensure defendants Solano County Sheriff, Purcells, Sheppard,

Cullison and Pettaway are served, and has a duty to prosecute

this action against all defendants.

7. Plaintiff’s August 15, 2005, motion for extension of 

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01657-AK Document 41 Filed 08/24/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

time to gather discovery and August 16, 2005, motion for

discovery are moot in light of this order. 

So ordered.

Dated: August 23, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01657-AK Document 41 Filed 08/24/05 Page 3 of 3