Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03849/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03849-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF MORI

Case No. 5:15-cv-03849-EJD

Error! Unknown document property name.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No. 217981)

Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)

Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor

San Jose, California 95110

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAREN SOVATH,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC.; EQUIFAX, INC.; TRANSUNION, 

LLC; MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP 

RESORTS, INC,; V.W. CREDIT, INC.; 

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL 

CORPORATION; NORDSTROM FSB; 

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL RETAIL 

BANK; TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES 

AND DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 5:15-cv-03849-EJD

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S 

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP 

RESORTS, INC., PURSUANT TO 

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE 41(a)(2)

Complaint Filed: August 24, 2015

Hon. Edward J. Davila

Case 5:15-cv-03849-EJD Document 56 Filed 01/13/16 Page 1 of 3 Case 5:15-cv-03849-EJD Document 63 Filed 01/20/16 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF MORI

-2- Case No. 5:15-cv-03849-EJD

Error! Unknown document property name.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court, having duly considered Plaintiff Karen Sovath’s Request for Dismissal of 

Defendant Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc., Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(2), orders as follows:

1. Defendant Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. (“MORI”) is dismissed from this 

action with prejudice.

2. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over Plaintiff and MORI for the purposes of 

enforcing the settlement agreement separately entered into by Plaintiff and MORI.

3. Plaintiff and MORI shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________________ ____________________________________

Hon. Edward J. Davila

District Court Judge

Case 5:15-cv-03849-EJD Document 56 Filed 01/13/16 Page 2 of 3

1/20/2016

Case 5:15-cv-03849-EJD Document 63 Filed 01/20/16 Page 2 of 2