Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06493/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06493-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENTERCOM SACRAMENTO, LLC, et al.

Plaintiffs,

 v.

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE,

Defendant. /

No. C 07-06493 JSW

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

AND SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte

Application for An Order Shortening Time for Hearing On Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary

Adjudication of Issues Without Controversy in the First, Second, and Third Claim for Relief

and upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Administrative Relief to Extend Time to

Respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Adjudication.

The Court concludes that Plaintiffs have not demonstrated good cause for expediting the

hearing on the motion for summary adjudication. Having considered Plaintiffs’ opposition to

Defendant’s motion, the Court also concludes that Defendant has not demonstrated good cause

to extend the briefing schedule set by this Court. Accordingly, the briefing schedule on

Plaintiffs’ motion for summary adjudication shall not be modified.

On February 28, 2008, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay

this action and noticed it for hearing on April 25, 2008. Plaintiffs’ opposition to that motion

shall be due on March 14, 2008, and Defendant’s reply shall be due on March 21, 2008. If the

parties seek to modify this briefing schedule, they may submit a motion for administrative relief

Case 3:07-cv-06493-JSW Document 32 Filed 02/29/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

demonstrating good cause for such a request. If the Court determines that the matter is suitable

for disposition without oral argument, it shall advise the parties in advance of the hearing date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 29, 2008 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-06493-JSW Document 32 Filed 02/29/08 Page 2 of 2