Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02229/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02229-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Rose v. State of California, et al./Case #C05-cv-2232-GEB-EFB 

Stipulation And Protective Order Regarding Documents, Things, And Information 

To Be Produced By The Parties For Inspection, Copying And Use In This Litigation 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Haapala, Altura, Thompson & Abern LLP Attorneys At Law 

Park Plaza Building 

1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: 510-763-2324 

Facsimile: 510-273-8570

Clyde A. Thompson, SBN 72920 

Rebecca S. Widen, 219207 

HAAPALA, ALTURA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP 

1939 Harrison Street, Suite 800 

Oakland, California 94612 

Tel: 510-763-2324 

Fax: 510-273-8570 

Attorneys For Defendants 

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY and SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 

DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY KEVIN MAYO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PETER ROSE; ASHLEY ROSE, a minor, by 

and through her Guardian Ad Litem, her 

custodial parent, Peter Rose; BRITNEY 

ROSE, a minor a minor, by and through her 

Guardian Ad Litem, her custodial parent, Peter 

Rose; and PETER ROSE JR., a minor, by and 

through his Guardian Ad Litem, his custodial 

parent, Peter Rose, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE; KATHLEEN CIULA, in her 

individual capacity; and DOES 1 through 25, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:05-cv-2232-GEB-EFB 

MASTER FILE 

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE 

ORDER REGARDING DOCUMENTS, 

THINGS, AND INFORMATION TO BE 

PRODUCED BY THE PARTIES FOR 

INSPECTION, COPYING AND USE IN 

THIS LITIGATION

 vs. 

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY; SAN JOAQUIN 

COUNTY DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY 

KEVIN MAYO; and DOES 1 THROUGH 25 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:05-cv-02208-GEB-PAN (closed) 

 vs. 

CITY OF LODI, CALIFORNIA; MATTHEW 

FOSTER; ERNEST A. NIES, JR.; and 

DOES 1 through 25, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:05-cv-2229-GEB-EFB 

Case 2:05-cv-02229-GEB-EFB Document 34 Filed 11/02/06 Page 1 of 5
1 

Rose v. State of California, et al./Case #C05-cv-2232-GEB-EFB 

Stipulation And Protective Order Regarding Documents, Things, And Information 

To Be Produced By The Parties For Inspection, Copying And Use In This Litigation 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Haapala, Altura, Thompson & Abern LLP Attorneys At Law 

Park Plaza Building 

1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: 510-763-2324 

Facsimile: 510-273-8570

 Plaintiffs and Defendants in the above-captioned consolidated actions (hereafter “the 

Parties”) will be producing certain materials and information in this action, either by request for 

production or through an initial disclosure in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

Rule 26. The Parties believe such documents, materials, and information is, in whole or in part, 

confidential, security sensitive and privileged and will only be produced for inspection or 

copying under this protective order. 

 The consolidated actions involve allegations by Plaintiff, Peter Rose, that he was 

wrongfully convicted of the violent, sexual assault of a 13-year-old girl in 1995. The 

defendants in the case include the police agency and its officers who investigated the crime, the 

district attorney’s office that prosecuted the crime, and the state criminologists involved in the 

prosecution. The files of these entities contain documents setting forth identifying information 

on the victim, her family, witnesses and other third parties. They also contain documents with 

sensitive information concerning the victim’s sexual history and activities, details of the rape 

itself, details of the victim’s state of mind after the crime, and other such information. To 

protect against any unnecessary or gratuitous disclosure of such sensitive and confidential 

information, and to protect the privacy rights of any third parties, 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through their counsel, as follows: 

 1. All writings (as defined by Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 1001), materials, and 

information produced and designated “confidential” by the Parties (hereinafter referred to as 

“such writings, materials, or information”) shall be securely maintained and kept confidential in 

accordance with the terms of this stipulation and protective order. Any document designated 

confidential shall be marked “confidential.” The Parties and their counsel will act in good faith 

in designating the writings as “confidential.” If any party, through their counsel, contend that 

any of the writings designated as “confidential” by an opposing party is not confidential, 

security sensitive or privileged, then that party and/or counsel must make a proper and timely 

objection to opposing counsel, meet and confer in an effort to resolve the disagreement, and if 

the disagreement is not resolved after meeting and conferring bring the issue before the Court 

for resolution. 

Case 2:05-cv-02229-GEB-EFB Document 34 Filed 11/02/06 Page 2 of 5
2 

Rose v. State of California, et al./Case #C05-cv-2232-GEB-EFB 

Stipulation And Protective Order Regarding Documents, Things, And Information 

To Be Produced By The Parties For Inspection, Copying And Use In This Litigation 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Haapala, Altura, Thompson & Abern LLP Attorneys At Law 

Park Plaza Building 

1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: 510-763-2324 

Facsimile: 510-273-8570

 2. Counsel for the parties may as appropriate in this action show any such 

“confidential” writings, photographs, materials, or any copies, prints, negatives, listings or 

summaries to parties to the action and to witnesses and experts or consultants employed by the 

parties and retained in connection with this specific action. The Parties and their counsel shall 

not give, show, or otherwise divulge any such writings, photographs, materials or information, 

or the contents or substance thereof, or any copies, prints, negatives, listings or summaries, to 

any person or other entity except their employees, experts or consultants employed and retained 

in connection with this specific action. 

 3. The employees, experts or consultants of the parties in this action to whom such 

writings, materials or information are intended to be presented, shall before such writings, 

materials or information are presented to them be given a copy of this stipulation and protective 

order and shall agree to be bound by its terms. 

 4. All writings submitted to or filed with the Court in connection with this action, 

which contain, set forth, summarize or otherwise refer to confidential documents, materials or 

information or their contents, shall be filed with the Court under seal in accordance with the 

procedures set forth in Eastern District Local Rules 39-140 and 39-141. 

 5. The parties through their counsel, experts and consultants may only use the writings 

covered by this order and information contained in them solely in connection with the abovecaptioned consolidated actions. 

 6. Upon completion of the trial and any appeals in this case, or upon conclusion of any 

settlement, counsel for the parties who have obtained any writings, materials or information 

under this order shall collect them from all recipients and return them and all copies, lists, prints, 

negatives or summaries to counsel for the Party that produced the confidential material. 

 7. Neither the Parties, their counsel, or any of the other persons or entities who have 

agreed to be bound by the terms of the stipulation and protective order shall hereafter 

unilaterally change, limit, vacate or otherwise modify or terminate the effect of this stipulation 

and protective order. Any modification to the protective order requires further stipulation of the 

Parties and court order, or by motion to the court for good cause. 

Case 2:05-cv-02229-GEB-EFB Document 34 Filed 11/02/06 Page 3 of 5
3 

Rose v. State of California, et al./Case #C05-cv-2232-GEB-EFB 

Stipulation And Protective Order Regarding Documents, Things, And Information 

To Be Produced By The Parties For Inspection, Copying And Use In This Litigation 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Haapala, Altura, Thompson & Abern LLP Attorneys At Law 

Park Plaza Building 

1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: 510-763-2324 

Facsimile: 510-273-8570

 8. The improper disclosure of any confidential writings, materials, or information 

obtained under this stipulation and protective order, or any other violation of this protective 

order by any person or entity, shall render the offending person or entity subject to such sanction 

as the Court deems appropriate. 

Dated: September , 2006 LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 

 By:___/signature on original_____________________ 

 Mark E. Merin 

 Attorneys For Plaintiffs 

Dated: September , 2006 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

 By:___/signature on original_____________ 

 James C. Philips 

 Attorneys For Defendant KATHLEEN CIULA 

Dated: September , 2006 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF 

 By: /signature on original_____________________________ 

 Bruce Alan Kilday 

 Attorneys For Defendant CITY OF LODI 

Dated: September , 2006 SCOTT, NICHOLS & MATTEUCCI 

 By:__/signature on original____________________ 

 William Stephen Scott 

 Attorneys For Defendants MATTHEW FOSTER 

 and ERNEST A. NILES, JR. 

Dated: September , 2006 HAAPALA, ALTURA, 

 THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP 

 By:___/signature on original 

 Rebecca S. Widen 

 Attorneys For Defendants, SAN JOAQUIN 

 COUNTY & SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY DEPUTY 

 DISTRICT ATTORNEY KEVIN MAYO 

// 

// 

// 

Case 2:05-cv-02229-GEB-EFB Document 34 Filed 11/02/06 Page 4 of 5
4 

Rose v. State of California, et al./Case #C05-cv-2232-GEB-EFB 

Stipulation And Protective Order Regarding Documents, Things, And Information 

To Be Produced By The Parties For Inspection, Copying And Use In This Litigation 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Haapala, Altura, Thompson & Abern LLP Attorneys At Law 

Park Plaza Building 

1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: 510-763-2324 

Facsimile: 510-273-8570

PROTECTIVE ORDER

 The Court having considered the proposed stipulation regarding writings and 

documents of the parties to this action, and there being good cause, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 1, 2006 

Case 2:05-cv-02229-GEB-EFB Document 34 Filed 11/02/06 Page 5 of 5