Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235-170/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING POWER INTEGRATIONS’ 

ADMIN. MOT. TO SEAL 

Case No. 3:09-cv-05235- MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., 

a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and 

SYSTEM GENERAL CORPORATION, 

a Taiwanese corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:09-cv-05235-MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

POWER INTEGRATIONS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

Plaintiff Power Integrations, Inc. (“Power Integrations”) filed an Administrative Motion to 

File Under Seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 with this Court on April 10, 2017, seeking

permission to maintain under seal portions of its Opposition to Fairchild’s Motion Requesting a 

Stay of Execution and Waiver of Any Bond Requirement and the Declaration of Jonathan D. 

Putnam in Support of Power Integration’s Opposition to Fairchild’s Motion Requesting a Stay of 

Execution and Waiver of Any Bond Requirement.

Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Power Integrations’ request to 

have the designated portions of the following document remain sealed:

Defendants filed a declaration in support thereof. Re. Dkt. No. 1049

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 1062 Filed 05/19/17 Page 1 of 2
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING POWER INTEGRATIONS’ 

ADMIN. MOT. TO SEAL 

Case No. 3:09-cv-05235- MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Power Integrations’ Opposition to Fairchild’s Motion Requesting a Stay of 

Execution and Waiver of Any Bond Requirement (“Power Integrations’ 

Opposition”).

 Declaration of Jonathan D. Putnam in Support of Power Integrations’ Opposition 

(“Putnam Declaration”)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________, 2017

____________________________________

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

51017142.doc

May 19

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 1062 Filed 05/19/17 Page 2 of 2