Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00679/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00679-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTHONY GOODSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COLUSA COUNTY SUPERIOR 

COURTS, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:20-cv-0679-EFB P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On April 6, 2020, the court found that plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis was not accompanied by a certified trust account statement, as required by 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). ECF No. 4. 

Accordingly, the court directed plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, a certified trust 

account statement to complete his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. The court 

also warned plaintiff that failure to do so would result in this action being dismissed. Id. The 

time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not submitted the certified trust account 

statement or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States 

District Judge to this case. 

Case 2:20-cv-00679-KJM-EFB Document 6 Filed 05/19/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: May 18, 2020.

Case 2:20-cv-00679-KJM-EFB Document 6 Filed 05/19/20 Page 2 of 2