Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01624/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01624-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORIO FUNTANILLA, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROMAN W. WILLIAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:10-cv-01624-LJO-DLB PC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING 

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Plaintiff Gregorio Funtanilla, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s first amended 

complaint against Defendants Roman W. Williams, Jesuit S. Manson, K. Turner, D. Ibarra, O. A. 

Ybarra, M.A. Baires, J. Lias, R. Gomez, Nola Grannis, Angela Romanello, Kelly Santoro, Derral G. 

Adams, and Ken Clark for violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the 

Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000. On March 22, 2012, Plaintiff was 

instructed with service of process and directed to effect service on these thirteen Defendants within

120 days. ECF No. 24.

On April 26, 2012, a summons was returned executed on Defendant Roman Williams. ECF 

No. 39. Defendant Williams, despite being allegedly served with process personally on April 12, 

2012, did not file a responsive pleading as required by Rule 12(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. Plaintiff however has not further prosecuted this action. Failure to prosecute may result 

Case 1:10-cv-01624-LJO-DLB Document 43 Filed 02/12/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

in dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Williams. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to show cause within twenty-one 

(21) days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute as to Defendant Williams 

Failure to timely respond or otherwise show cause will result in dismissal of this action against 

Defendant Williams for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2013 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

3b142a

Case 1:10-cv-01624-LJO-DLB Document 43 Filed 02/12/13 Page 2 of 2