Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-02052/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-02052-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFF HEALY,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHAGUFTA YASMEEN, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:19-CV-2052-WBS-DMC-P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 57, for an order 

reassigning this matter to the undersigned for all purposes as the presiding judge. Plaintiff's 

motion will be denied because a review of the docket reflects that not all parties have filed the 

form indicating their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. 

The parties are informed that they may, if all consent in writing, have this case 

assigned to the United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes while preserving their right to 

appeal any final judgment directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit or, 

where appropriate, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c)(1), (3); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1); E.D. Cal. Local Rule 305(a), (c). The parties 

are advised that they are free to withhold consent and that doing so shall not result in any adverse 

consequences. See § 636(c)(2). If all parties consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the action 

Case 2:19-cv-02052-DMC Document 60 Filed 09/19/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

will be reassigned to the undersigned for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See

Local Rule 301 and Local Rule 305(b).

A review of the record reflects that all parties to this action have not yet filed a 

written election regarding consent to the exercise of full jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge.

The Clerk of the Court will be directed to provide the parties with the appropriate form which the 

parties shall then complete if they have not already done so, indicating either consent or nonconsent as they may choose, and file with the Court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward to all parties the court’s 

consent notice and form; and

2. If they have not already done so, the parties shall complete and file the 

consent election form within 30 days of the date of this order.

3. Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 57, is denied. 

Dated: September 18, 2024

____________________________________

DENNIS M. COTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:19-cv-02052-DMC Document 60 Filed 09/19/24 Page 2 of 2