Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02676/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02676-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2004\2676\order re litigation schedule.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE ATM FEE ANTITRUST

LITIGATION,

 /

This Document Relates To:

ALL ACTIONS

___________________________________/

No. C 04-02676 CRB

ORDER RE: 

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 

MASTER LITIGATION SCHEDULE

Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of a master litigation

schedule. The Court adheres to the view that discovery currently should be limited to what is

“necessary to elucidate the plausible procompetitive justifications that might be advanced in

support of the fixed interchange fee.” Memorandum and Order, Docket No. 360, at 1. 

Further, as it has previously indicated, the Court intends to retain jurisdiction over disputes

relating to the scope of discovery. Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 10, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-02676-CRB Document 416 Filed 07/10/07 Page 1 of 1