Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03119/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03119-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 690
Nature of Suit: Other Forfeiture and Penalty Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

APPROXIMATELY $2,822,224.75 IN FUNDS

SEIZED FROM EIGHT BANK ACCOUNTS, 

ONE 2007 PORSCHE C4 CABRIOLET

(VIN: WP0CB29927S777234), ONE 2005

PORSCHE CAYENNE S

(VIN: WP1AB29P35LA66041), 

AND SEVEN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY

AND IMPROVEMENTS,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-03119 WHA

ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF

DOCUMENTS AND PENDING

DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS

As set forth at the hearing on April 14, 2010, claimant Inc21’s objections to the

government’s document requests are overruled, as the government has a legitimate need for these

documents to prepare for trial. Similarly, the objections to the government’s pending

interrogatories — with the exception of interrogatory number three — are overruled for the same

reasons. With respect to the third interrogatory, the $5,000 threshold will be increased to

$20,000. Since these requests have been pending since February 22, 2010, Inc21 is charged with

full notice of these discovery obligations.

Case 3:09-cv-03119-WHA Document 64 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

As such, Inc21 is ORDERED to produce all requested documents for inspection and

copying by the government at their place of business — Inc21 Corporation, 785 Market Street,

Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94103 — BY NOON ON MAY 5, 2010. Inc21 is also ORDERED to

respond to all outstanding interrogatories (with the third interrogatory modified as noted above)

by the same deadline. The method of production may only be changed by a written and signed

agreement between the parties.

Counsel for Inc21 shall serve a copy of this order on the defendants as well as Attorney

Joel Dichter, who is counsel of record for Inc21 in the related FTC enforcement action. Attorney

Dichter shall do his part to ensure that this order reaches his clients in a timely manner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-03119-WHA Document 64 Filed 04/14/10 Page 2 of 2