Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03787/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03787-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief

---

1

Case No. 14-CV-03787-LHK

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO 

AUGMENT SUMMARY JUDGMENT RECORD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JUVENTINA MATA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MANPOWER INC. / CALIFORNIA 

PENINSULA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-CV-03787-LHK 

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER AND 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX 

PARTE APPLICATION TO AUGMENT 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT RECORD

Re: Dkt. 140

Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: Charles Swanson, Patrick Toole

Defendants’ Attorneys: Tim Johnson, Jesse Ferrantella

A case management conference was held on January 21, 2016. A further case management 

conference is set for May 19, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall file their joint case management 

statement by May 12, 2016.

At the case management conference, the Court made the following rulings:

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO AUGMENT SUMMARY JUDGMENT

RECORD (ECF No. 140)

For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiffs’ ex parte application to augment the record 

is DENIED. 

DISCOVERY

Defendants shall provide to Plaintiffs by January 29, 2016 a full list of Defendants’ 

Case 5:14-cv-03787-LHK Document 143 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 14-CV-03787-LHK

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO 

AUGMENT SUMMARY JUDGMENT RECORD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

30(b)(6) witnesses, designated by topic. Defendants shall also provide by January 29, 2016 an 

updated version of the document map discussed at the case management conference. The parties 

shall meet and confer in person by February 4, 2016 in order to resolve any remaining discovery 

disputes, including disputes related to the narrowing of search terms for e-discovery. As stated at 

the case management conference, Plaintiffs’ request to increase the number of depositions is 

DENIED.

The case schedule remains as set. For the convenience of the parties, the case schedule is 

set forth below:

Scheduled Event Date

Briefing Schedule on Motion for Class Certification Motion: March 4, 2016

Opp’n: April 4, 2016

Reply: April 25, 2016

Class Certification Hearing May 19, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.

Fact Discovery Cutoff August 15, 2016

Opening Expert Reports September 15, 2016

Rebuttal Expert Reports September 29, 2016

Close of Expert Discovery October 18, 2016

Deadline to File Dispositive Motions November 1, 2016

Hearing on Dispositive Motions December 22, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.

Final Pretrial Conference February 16, 2017, at 1:30 p.m.

Jury Trial March 20, 2017, at 9:00 a.m.

Trial Length 11 days

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 21, 2016

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-03787-LHK Document 143 Filed 01/21/16 Page 2 of 2