Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01821/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01821-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 08:1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

ADA E. BOSQUE

Department of Justice

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone (202) 514-0179

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BIN ZHOU, et al., ) CV S-07-1821 LKK JFM

) 

 Plaintiffs, )

) STIPULATED MOTION

 v. ) FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

) RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

EMILIO GONZALES, )

 DIRECTOR, US CITIZENSHIP )

 AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, )

 et al., )

Defendants. ) 

______________________________) 

Defendants, by undersigned counsel, respectfully move, for an

additional twenty-one (21) days to file the defendants’ response to

plaintiffs’ complaint, to and including November 26, 2007. 

Defendants’ counsels is scheduled to argue Corovic v. Attorney

General, 07-156, before the United States Court of Appeals for the

Second Circuit, on November 6, 2007. Further, defendants’ counsel

is scheduled to argue the following cases before the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of California: Garcha v.

Curda, 07-1413 (Nov. 13, 2007); Wolter v. Keisler, 07-241 (Nov. 13,

2007); Shirmohamadali v. Curda, 07-1073 (Nov. 16, 2007); Gianni v.

Curda, 07-1478 (Nov. 19, 2007); Liu v. Curda, 07-1436 (Nov. 19,

Case 2:07-cv-01821-LKK -JFM Document 15 Filed 11/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2007); Gomez v. Chertoff, 07-1094 (Nov. 20, 2007). Thus, despite

exercising due diligence, defendants’ counsel has been unable to

complete the defendants’ response within the current scheduled time. 

This is defendants’ first request for an extension in this case. 

Plaintiffs’ counsel consents to this motion.

Dated: November 2, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

 /s/ Ada E. Bosque 

ADA E. BOSQUE

Department of Justice

O R D E R

Pursuant to defendants’ request for an extension of the time in

which to respond to plaintiff’s complaint in Zhou v. Gonzales, 07-

cv-1821-LKK-JFM, and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that defendants’ deadline to file a response to the

complaint is extended until November 26, 2007. 

DATED: November 8, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-01821-LKK -JFM Document 15 Filed 11/09/07 Page 2 of 2