Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03533/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03533-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY INGALLS and TONY HONG,

individually and on behalf of all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SPOTIFY USA, INC., a Delaware

corporation, DOES 1–10, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 16-03533 WHA

REQUEST FOR

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

AND EXTENDING DEADLINE

FOR DEFENDANT’S REPLY

Defendant Spotify USA, Inc., has moved to compel arbitration. In its motion, Spotify

contends, inter alia, that the parties delegated the issue of arbitrability to arbitration. Yesterday,

our court of appeals decided Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 15-16178 (9th Cir. Sept.

7, 2016), which reversed the district court’s decision that a delegation clause was unenforceable. 

Our plaintiffs cited the district court decision in Mohamed v. Uber extensively in their

opposition. By SEPTEMBER 14, AT NOON, plaintiffs shall supplement their opposition brief to

address the decision by our court of appeals. Plaintiffs’ supplemental brief shall NOT EXCEED

FIVE PAGES. The deadline for Spotify’s reply brief shall be extended to SEPTEMBER 21, AT

NOON. The hearing scheduled for SEPTEMBER 29 remains in place.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 8, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-03533-WHA Document 28 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 1