Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00672/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00672-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

D. DUSTIN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0672 GEB JFM P

vs.

R. TOWNSEND, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed October 24, 2005, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and

thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. On January 30, 2006 plaintiff

was granted an additional thirty days to file a second amended complaint. That period has now

expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:04-cv-00672-GEB -JFM Document 37 Filed 03/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 7, 2006.

/001; dust0672.fta2

Case 2:04-cv-00672-GEB -JFM Document 37 Filed 03/08/06 Page 2 of 2