Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01222/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-01222-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION FOR EXTENDING TIME - CASE NO. C05-01222 CW 

LESLIE F. LEVY, ESQ., State Bar No. 104634

DARCI E. BURRELL, ESQ., State Bar No. 180467

BOXER & GERSON, LLP

300 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 500

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 835-8870

Facsimile: (510) 835-0415

E-mail: courtmail@boxerlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

K. F., and C. OLUKA,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

GUARDSMARK, LLC, SHERMAN FORD

and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive,

 Defendants. 

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

No. C05-01222 CW

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED

STIPULATION FOR EXTENDING TIME

Complaint Filed: January 14, 2005

Trial Date: January 8, 2007

The opposition to each of Defendants’ Summary Judgment motions are currently due July 14,

2006. The reply briefs are currently due July 21, 2006. The parties request an extension of time as

set forth herein.

Plaintiff hereby requests that this Court continue the date on which his opposition to both

Summary Judgments are due to July 26, 2006. This request is being made on the basis of difficulties

in Plaintiff counsel’s calendar, including the illness of a close relative requiring out of town travel

and the fact that two separate summary judgment motions require oppositions at the same time.

Defendants have graciously agreed to an extension to July 26, 2006 for oppositions. 

However, due to travel schedules of the responsible defense counsels, this extension will not allow

them to reply within the one week time frame. Therefore, the parties request that the reply briefs be

due on August 14, 2006.

Case 4:05-cv-01222-CW Document 37 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION FOR EXTENDING TIME - CASE NO. C05-01222 CW 

The parties do not believe that these extensions will effect the litigation process as discovery

is closed and trial is not until January 2007. Therefore, the parties respectfully request that the Court

grant the request that Plaintiff’s oppositions to both summary judgment motions be due on July 26,

2006 and that each Defendant’s reply brief be due on August 14, 2006.

Dated: July 7, 2006 BOXER & GERSON, LLP

By: /s/ 

 Leslie F. Levy

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs K.F. and C. OLUKA

Dated: July 6, 2006 LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP

By: /s/ 

Peter O. Glaessner, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant, SHERMAN FORD

Dated: July 6, 2006 LOW BALL & LYNCH 

By: /s/ 

Steven Werth, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant, GUARDSMARK, LLC

IT IS SO STIPULATED. Plaintiff shall file a single, consolidated opposition to Defendants’

motions of no more than 30 pages. Defendants shall file a single, consolidated reply of no more

than 20 pages, or separate replies of no more than 10 pages each.

7/18/06

Dated: 

JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 4:05-cv-01222-CW Document 37 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2