Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-02399/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-02399-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 150
Nature of Suit: Overpayments &amp; Enforcement of Judgments
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Airbus DS Optronics GmbH,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Nivisys LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-14-02399-PHX-JAT

ORDER 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Plaintiff Airbus DS Optronics 

GmbH (“Airbus”) and non-party First Texas Holdings Corporation (“First Texas”) have 

stipulated and agreed to the entry of the following Stipulated Order applying the terms of 

the Protective Order, previously entered by this Court on June 30, 2015, to the production 

of documents by non-party First Texas to Airbus in response to Airbus’s Subpoena, dated 

January 21, 2015, served on First Texas. The Court has previously found that this action 

may involve trade secrets and other valuable research, development, commercial, 

financial and technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from 

public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is 

warranted. Accordingly, in order to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the 

prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 

protect information that First Texas is entitled or required to keep confidential, and to 

ensure that the parties are permitted reasonably necessary uses of such materials in 

Case 2:14-cv-02399-JAT Document 104 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

preparation for and in the conduct of trial, 

IT IS ORDERED approving the stipulation filed at Doc. 100. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Protective Order entered at Doc. 92 shall 

apply to the production of documents by non-party First Texas Holdings Corporation 

pursuant to the subpoena served on First Texas Holdings Corporation by Plaintiff Airbus 

in this action. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the definition of “Documents” in the 

Protective Order entered at Doc. 92 is clarified, as applied to First Texas Holdings 

Corporation, to specifically include electronically-stored information, electronicallystored documents, and hard copies of documents. Nothing in this clarification is intended 

to affect the definition of “Documents” in the Protective Order as it applies to other nonparties or parties. 

 Dated this 17th day of September, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-02399-JAT Document 104 Filed 09/17/15 Page 2 of 2