Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01601/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01601-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No.: 04-01601 FMS (EDL) \\ussfofp01\nctuttle$\My Documents\ACTERNA\Proposed Order Granting Acternas Mo to Compel.d

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ACTERNA LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL

John P. Bovich (150688)

Kerry Hopkins (219406)

REED SMITH LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111-3922

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 7936

San Francisco, CA 94120-7936

Telephone: 415.543.8700

Facsimile: 415.391.8269

Eugene LeDonne (admitted pro hac vice)

Stephen M. Chin (admitted pro hac vice)

REED SMITH LLP

599 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Telephone: 212.521.5400

Facsimile: 212.521.5450

Attorneys for Defendant

ACTERNA LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUNRISE TELECOM INCORPORATED, a 

Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ACTERNA LLC, a Delaware limited liability 

company,

Defendant.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

No.: 04-01601 FMS (EDL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN

PART ACTERNA, LLC’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL PRODUCTION OF 

DOCUMENTS

Case 3:04-cv-01601-WWS Document 120 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 2
REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No.: 04-01601 FMS –1–\\ussfofp01\nctuttle$\My Documents\ACTERNA\Proposed Order Granting Acternas Mo to Com

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ACTERNA LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL

On May 24, 2005 at 2:00 p.m. in this Court, Defendant/Counterclaimant Acterna 

LLC’s (“Acterna”) Motion to Compel came on regularly for hearing. Acterna and 

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Sunrise Telecom Incorporated (“Sunrise”) appeared through their 

respective counsel of record. Based on the papers filed by the parties, oral argument and the record 

in this action, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Acterna’s Motion to 

Compel is GRANTED in part.

Sunrise is ordered to complete its production of documents in response to Acterna’s 

First and Second Sets of Requests for Production by June 14, 2005 and include an accompanying 

declaration of the Sunrise person most knowledgeable attesting that all reasonable and diligent 

search efforts have been made and that all non-privileged documents have been produced.

Sunrise is also ordered to allow visual inspection and photographing of the internal 

boards of the sample of the accused AT2000HG product in its counsel’s Menlo Park office. The 

inspection shall take place at a time to be mutually agreed upon between the parties, but in any case, 

shall be scheduled for a mutually convenient date reasonably in advance of discovery cut-off in this 

action. The parties shall confer in good faith to set a protocol for such inspection.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 31, 2005.

__________________________________

Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:04-cv-01601-WWS Document 120 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 2