Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00971/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00971-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEJANDRO ORDAZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

DENNIS SMITH, Warden, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:07-cv-00971 LJO-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 9)

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION (Doc. 8)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On February 26, 2008, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the instant petition on the

grounds that the petition be dismissed as moot. (Doc. 8). On April 11, 2008, the Magistrate Judge

assigned to the case filed a Findings and Recommendations recommending that Petitioner's motion

be granted and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED. (Doc. 9). The Findings

and Recommendations was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. To date, none of the parties in this

case have filed objections.

Case 1:07-cv-00971-LJO-TAG Document 10 Filed 05/01/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued April 11, 2008 (Doc. 9), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 8), is GRANTED;

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 1, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00971-LJO-TAG Document 10 Filed 05/01/08 Page 2 of 2