Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01483/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01483-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1483

KISHA MARIE DAVIS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Physicians MUSC-P,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Mary Gordon Baker, Magistrate

Judge. (2:14-cv-03152-MGB)

Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 16, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kisha Marie Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Andreas Neal Satterfield, 

Jr., John Sulau, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1483 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Kisha Marie Davis appeals the magistrate judge’s* order 

granting Medical University of South Carolina summary judgment 

on her claims, brought pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave 

Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2012), the Americans with 

Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2012), the Age 

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 

U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016), and Title VII 

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e 

to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Davis’ application to 

proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by 

the magistrate judge. See Davis v. Med. Univ. of S.C., No. 

2:14-cv-03152-MGB (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).

Appeal: 16-1483 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2016 Pg: 2 of 2