Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-02324/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-02324-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY CHAVARRIA,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

P. A. GREEN, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:10-cv-02324-LJO-GSA-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANTS

DUENAS, GREEN, AND WILSON, ON 

PLAINTIFF=S EIGHTH AMENDMENT 

MEDICAL CLAIMS, AND THAT ALL 

OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE 

DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 30 DAYS

Anthony Chavarria (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The case now proceeds on the 

original Complaint filed by Plaintiff on December 14, 2010. (Doc. 1.) The Complaint names 

Dr. Duenas, Dr. Igbinosa, and Physician’s Assistants (PA) Green and Wilson as defendants, 

and alleges claims for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment.

The court screened Plaintiff=s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A and found that 

it states cognizable medical claims under § 1983 against Dr. Duenas, Green (PA), and Wilson 

(PA). (Doc. 10.) On November 13, 2013, Plaintiff was granted leave to either file an amended 

complaint or notify the court that he is willing to proceed only on the claims found cognizable 

by the court. (Id.) On December 2, 2013, Plaintiff filed a notice informing the court that he is 

willing to proceed only on the cognizable Eighth Amendment medical claims, against 

defendants Green, Wilson, and Duenas. (Doc. 11.)

Case 1:10-cv-02324-DAD-EPG Document 12 Filed 12/05/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

1. This action proceed only against defendants Dr. Duenas and Physician’s 

Assistants Green and Wilson, on Plaintiff’s claims for inadequate medical care 

under the Eighth Amendment;

2. All remaining claims and defendants be dismissed from this action; and

3. Defendant Dr. Igbinosa be dismissed from this action based on Plaintiff's failure 

to state any claims upon which relief may be granted against him.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District 

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(l). Within 

thirty (30) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file 

written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned AObjections to 

Magistrate Judge=s Findings and Recommendations.@ Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court=s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 4, 2013 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

6i0kij8d

Case 1:10-cv-02324-DAD-EPG Document 12 Filed 12/05/13 Page 2 of 2