Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01143/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01143-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

Case No.: 3:15-cv-01143-JCS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

CALIFORNIA

Lisa C. Hamasaki (SBN 197628)

 lch@millerlawgroup.com

Valerie Gerard (SBN 290732)

 VGerard@millerlawgroup.com

MILLER LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

111 Sutter Street, Suite 700

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel. (415) 464-4300

Fax (415) 464-4336

Attorneys for Defendant 

AT&T SERVICES, INC. (erroneously sued as AT&T) 

CREITZ & SEREBIN LLP

Joseph A. Creitz, Cal. Bar No. 169552

 joe@creitzserebin.com

Lisa S. Serebin, Cal. Bar No. 146312

 lisa@creitzserebin.com

250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400

San Francisco, CA 94104

415.466.3090 (tel)

415.513.4475 (fax)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LUZ MALINAO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUZ MALINAO,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T, a corporation (in its capacity as plan 

sponsor, plan administrator, and fiduciary of 

THE AT&T MANAGEMENT PENSION PLAN 

and THE AT&T GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 

BENEFITS PLAN); THE AT&T MANAGEMENT 

PENSION PLAN, an ERISA-regulated pension 

benefit plan; AON HEWITT, a corporation (in its 

capacity as fiduciary and de facto administrator 

of THE AT&T MANAGEMENT PENSION 

PLAN); THE AT&T GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 

BENEFITS PLAN, an ERISA-regulated welfare 

benefit plan,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:15-cv-01143-JCS

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

Complaint filed: March 11, 2015

Case 4:15-cv-01143-YGR Document 9 Filed 03/31/15 Page 1 of 2 Case3:15-cv-01143-JCS Document7 Filed03/30/15 Page1 of 2
1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

Case No.: 3:15-cv-01143-JCS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILLER 

LAW 

GROUP

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

CALIFORNIA

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a) and Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff 

LUZ MALINAO (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant AT&T SERVICES, INC. (erroneously sued as 

AT&T) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, 

hereby stipulate to extend by thirty (30) days the time within which all Defendants may 

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

The Parties further stipulate that, Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint 

correcting the names of the Defendants named in the Complaint once the Parties have 

confirmed the correct names. If the Plaintiff files an Amended Complaint between the date 

of this Stipulation and May 5, 2015, the date within which all Defendants may respond to the 

Complaint will be determined from the date of service of the Amended Complaint. 

This Stipulation does not alter any Court-imposed deadlines.

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 30, 2015 CREITZ & SEREBIN LLP

By: /s/

Joseph A. Creitz

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LUZ MALINAO

Dated: March 30, 2015 MILLER LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/

Lisa C. Hamasaki

Valerie Gerard

Attorneys for Defendant

AT&T SERVICES, INC.

4821-0861-9554, v. 2

Case3:15-cv-01143-JCS Document7 Filed03/30/15 Page2 of 2

Dated: March 31, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 4:15-cv-01143-YGR Document 9 Filed 03/31/15 Page 2 of 2