Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-4_02-cv-04064/USCOURTS-arwd-4_02-cv-04064-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF

v. NO. 02-CV-4064

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY;

LORI ALLENBRAND; TRI-STATE TRAFFIC

CONTROL, INC.; and GREGORY L. LOGAN DEFENDANTS

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY;

LORI ALLENBRAND; and TRI-STATE

TRAFFIC CONTROL, INC. THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS

v.

CROWLEY INSURANCE, INC.; CROLEY

INSURANCE & FINANCIAL, INC.; and

B. THOMAS CROLEY, JR. THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Upon motion of the defendant, Union Pacific Railroad Company, for an order pursuant to Rule

62(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for a stay of execution on the judgment pending appeal, the Court

hereby finds:

1. Defendant has filed its notice of appeal from the judgment entered by the Court on

September 21, 2005. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 62(d) to issue a stay of execution.

2. Defendant has filed an appropriate supersedeas bond, securing the payment of damages and

costs that may be affirmed against the defendant on appeal. A stay is necessary to preserve the status quo

and to stay execution upon the judgment pending the appeal.

3. The supersedeas bond is hereby approved and a stay of execution on the judgment is hereby

granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13 day of October, 2005. th

/s/ Harry F. Barnes 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:02-cv-04064-HFB Document 191 Filed 10/13/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>