Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00173/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00173-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1640 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEYNE FERNANDEZ and JOSE J.

FERNANDEZ

 No. 2:10-cv-00173-MCE-GGH

Plaintiffs,

v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL dba

MORTGAGEIT INC.; GMAC MORTGAGE,

LLC; BROKER AGENT CONSULTING;

ETS SERVICES, LLC; MORTGAGE

ELECTRONIC RECORDING SYSTEMS,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

This action arises out of a mortgage loan transaction in

which Plaintiffs Leyne Fernandez and Jose J. Fernandez

(“Plaintiffs”) financed their home in 2005. Before the Court is

Plaintiffs’ ex parte application for a Temporary Restraining

Order (“TRO”) and Preliminary Injunction, pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 65, to enjoin Defendants from executing a

foreclosure sale on their home.

///

Case 2:10-cv-00173-MCE -GGH Document 9 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Pursuant to Local Rule 231(a) “[e]xcept in the most

extraordinary of circumstances, no temporary restraining order

shall be granted in the absence of actual notice to the affected

party and/or counsel, by telephone or other means, or a

sufficient showing of efforts made to provide notice.” Moreover,

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) mandates that the Court may

not issue a TRO without notice to the adverse party unless: 

“a) specific facts in an affidavit or verified

complaint clearly show that immediate and irreparable

injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant

before the adverse party can be heard in opposition;

and

b) the movant’s attorney certifies in writing any

efforts made to give notice and the reasons why it

should not be required.” 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(emphasis added). 

Plaintiffs have failed to indicate any efforts made to

provide notice to the adverse parties. Nor have Plaintiffs

provided an affidavit or verified complaint to support their

claim of irreparable injury.

Given Plaintiffs' complete failure to provide any notice

whatsoever of its intent to apply for a temporary restraining

order, Plaintiffs' Application is denied, nunc pro tunc, as of

the date it was submitted on February 16, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2010

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-00173-MCE -GGH Document 9 Filed 03/09/10 Page 2 of 2