Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_13-cv-00283/USCOURTS-azd-4_13-cv-00283-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Roy Warden, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Bob Walkup, individually and in his 

official capacity as Tucson City Mayor; et 

al. 

Defendants. 

CV-13-0283-TUC-DCB (BPV) Lead Case 

CV-13-1067-TUC-DCB (BPV)

 

 ORDER 

 

 

Pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LRCiv 42.1, and 

Plaintiff having no objection (see Doc. 56), 

IT IS ORDERED that: 

(1) Defendants’ Motion to Consolidate (Doc. 50) is GRANTED and CV-13-

283-TUC-DCB (BPV) shall be CONSOLIDATED with CV-13-1067-TUC-DCB (BPV); 

(2) Plaintiff shall have until May 1, 2017 to file and serve a Second Amended 

Complaint encompassing case numbers CV-13-283 and CV-13-1067 and the allegations 

thereto into a single unified complaint. Plaintiff is advised that the Second Amended 

Complaint will supersede the preceding pleadings filed in CV-13-283 and CV 13-1067. 

See Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) 

(party named in original complaint who was not named in amended complaint is no longer 

subject to that action); see also In re Ford Motor Co./Citibank (S. Dakota), N.A., 264 F.3d 

Case 4:13-cv-00283-DCB Document 58 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 2
 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

952, 965 (9th Cir. 2001) (“in a consolidated action, a consolidated complaint is the operative 

pleading and supersedes all previously filed complaints.”). Cf. Lacy v. Maricopa County, 693 

F.3d 896, 925-928 (9th Cir. 2012) (claims previously dismissed with prejudice and without 

leave to amend, including those dismissed on summary judgment, are not required to be 

repled in a subsequent amended complaint to preserve them for appeal.). Any parties or 

claims included in the preceding pleadings that are not included in the Second Amended 

Complaint shall be deemed voluntarily dismissed and/or waived. Additionally, the Second 

Amended Complaint must not incorporate by reference any part of the preceding pleadings, 

including exhibits; 

(3) Defendants shall file an Answer no later than twenty-one (21) days after service 

of the Second Amended Complaint; and 

(4) All future pleadings and other documents shall be filed under cause number CV13-283-TUC-DCB (BPV). 

Dated this 29th day of March, 2017. 

Case 4:13-cv-00283-DCB Document 58 Filed 03/30/17 Page 2 of 2