Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02133/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02133-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION RE: EXTENDING

DATE FOR FILING REPLY BRIEF & ORDER

Case No.: 2:05-cv-02133-KJM

Natalie P. Vance, Esq., Bar No. 206708

Ian A. Rambarran, Esq., Bar No. 227366

KLINEDINST PC

1107 Ninth Street, Suite 680

Sacramento, CA 95814

916/444-7573/FAX 916/444-7544

nvance@klinedinstlaw.com

irambarran@klinedinstlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. and

SHERMAN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO

ROBERT W. GALBRAITH ) Case No.: 2:05-CV-02133-DFL-KJM

individually and on behalf of ) 

others similarly situated, )

 ) STIPULATION RE: EXTENDING

Plaintiff, ) DATE FOR FILING REPLY

BRIEF & ORDER

 ) 

 )

 )

v. ) 

 )

RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES,) Hearing Date: Sept. 27, 2006 

L.P. AND SHERMAN FINANCIAL ) Time: 10:00 a.m.

GROUP, LLC, ) Courtroom: 26

 ) Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller

Defendants. ) 

_______________________________) Trial Date: July 16, 2007

In GOOD FAITH, all parties have worked and continue to work

together in good faith when scheduling matters of this case. In furtherance

of the courtesy and professionalism already shown by both parties, they

acknowledge that: There are substantial issues involved with the

Defendants’ Motion to Compel and Plaintiff’s opposition thereto, including

unconscionability tests and choice of law analyses, and the effects thereof

on all matters of this case, 

Case 2:05-cv-02133-KJM Document 53 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION RE: EXTENDING

DATE FOR FILING REPLY BRIEF & ORDER

Case No.: 2:05-cv-02133-KJM

THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE

PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD

THAT: Defendants may file their Reply Brief to Plaintiff’s Opposition to

Motion to Compel no later than September 14, 2006. 

Dated: September 7, 2006 Law Offices of Douglas J. Campion

By: 

______________________________

 Douglas J. Campion,

 Attorneys for the Plaintiff

Dated: September 7, 2006 KLINEDIST PC

By: 

______________________________

Ian A. Rambarran,

 Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:05-cv-02133-KJM Document 53 Filed 09/18/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION RE: EXTENDING

DATE FOR FILING REPLY BRIEF & ORDER

Case No.: 2:05-cv-02133-KJM

ORDER OF THE COURT

As set forth in the stipulation above and for good cause shown,

defendants may file their Reply Brief to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to

Compel no later than September 14, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2006

(nunc pro tunc to 9/7/06).

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-02133-KJM Document 53 Filed 09/18/06 Page 3 of 3