Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00265/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00265-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICKY LINCOLN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0265 DFL KJM PS

vs.

WILLIAM ROSENBERG, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

At the time of filing the complaint in this action, plaintiff also filed a request for

preliminary injunctive relief prohibiting defendants from proceeding with eviction proceedings. 

Since that time, plaintiff has filed a change of address to a post office box. Because it was not

clear from the record whether plaintiff had experienced a change of physical address that would

moot plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunctive relief, an order was filed April 29, 2005

directing plaintiff to show cause within ten days why the request for preliminary injunctive relief

was not moot. Ten days have since passed, and plaintiff has not shown cause why the request for

preliminary injunctive relief is not moot or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s February 10, 2005

motion for preliminary injunction be denied.

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00265-DFL -KJM Document 8 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 17, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

lincoln.ufb

Case 2:05-cv-00265-DFL -KJM Document 8 Filed 05/18/05 Page 2 of 2