Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-14-02152/USCOURTS-ca8-14-02152-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2152

___________________________

Nhut Le; Chai M. Le

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff

v.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Schiller & Adam, P.A.; JamesJ. Pauly; Divine N. Difongwa

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

Sidney Jintara Yang; Wells Fargo & Company

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants

Rebecca Schiller; Sarah J.B. Adam; Jeffrey D. Klobucar

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: March 6, 2015

Filed: March 13, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Appellate Case: 14-2152 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Entry ID: 4253958 
Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Nhut Le and Chai M. Le appeal fromthe order of the District Court dismissing 1

their complaint. Following careful de novo review, we agree with the District Court

that the Les’ complaint—which was devoid of factual allegations and contained only

conclusory legal theories about improprietiessurrounding the foreclosure sale oftheir

home and the underlying loan-related documents—failed to state a claim upon which

relief could be granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556

U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (“To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain

sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible

on its face.’” (citation to quoted case omitted)); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550

U.S. 544, 555 (2007); Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 760 F.3d 843, 848

(8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review). We have considered the Les’ other arguments

for reversal and find them to be without merit. We therefore affirm the judgment of

the District Court.

______________________________

The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Appellate Case: 14-2152 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Entry ID: 4253958