Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02145/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02145-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL COPANSKY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

PHIL LINZA, ROBERT BARTLETT,

MALCOLM L. PICONE, BARTLETT,

LEADER-PICONE & YOUNG, LLP,

AND OTHERS TO BE NAMED LATER,

Defendants. /

No. C 08-02145 WHA

ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

The emergency application for a restraining order is DENIED. The basic grievance is

that the state court has issued orders and processes over the objection of applicant. Even

assuming, for the sake of argument, that the orders and process somehow violated due process,

the applicant has a remedy in the state court of appeal. This Court is a federal district court. It

does not sit as a court of appeal to correct errors made by state courts. The application for a

temporary restraining order and all other emergency relief is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 25, 2008. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02145-WHA Document 7 Filed 04/25/08 Page 1 of 1