Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01298/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01298-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLENN RAY KEEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

CDCR, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-01298-AWI-LJO

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 34)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING

DEFENDANTS CDCR, CSP-CORCORAN,

AND WOODFORD FROM ACTION

(Doc. 23)

This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff Glenn Ray Keel

(“Plaintiff”) alleges that Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

(CDCR), California State Prison - Corcoran (CSP-Corcoran), Jeanne S. Woodford, D. Ortiz, Reed,

J. Payne, and Brendon violated his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the

United States Constitution. (Doc. 9.) This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s amended complaint,

filed November 16, 2005. (Id.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 30, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings andRecommendations were to be filed within thirty days. The parties have not filed timely

objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

///

Case 1:05-cv-01298-AWI-GSA Document 43 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings andRecommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 30, 2006, is adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ CDCR, CSP-Corcoran, and Woodford’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s

claims against them, filed January 9, 2006, is GRANTED, with prejudice; and

3. Defendants CDCR, CSP-Corcoran, and Woodford are dismissed from this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01298-AWI-GSA Document 43 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 2