Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00963/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00963-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LA1626486.1 

205625-10005 Case No. CV 06-0963 (VRW) – STIPULATION AND ORDER

LOEB & LOEB LLP 

MICHELLE LA MAR (State Bar No. 163038) 

mlamar@loeb.com 

BENJAMIN R. KING (State Bar No. 205447) 

bking@loeb.com 

JON DARYANANI (State Bar No. 205149) 

jdaryanani@loeb.com 

10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2200 

Los Angeles, California 90067-4120 

Telephone: 310-282-2000 

Facsimile: 310-282-2200 

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 

WILLIAM A. ESCOBAR (Admitted, Pro Hac Vice) 

wescobar@kelleydrye.com 

ROBERT I. STEINER (Admitted, Pro Hac Vice) 

rsteiner@kelleydrye.com 

KEVIN J. SMITH (Admitted, Pro Hac Vice) 

ksmith@kelleydrye.com 

101 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10178 

Telephone: (212) 808-7800 

Facsimile: (212) 808-7897 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, TATA CONSULTANCY 

SERVICES, LTD. and TATA SONS, LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GOPI VEDACHALAM and KANGANA 

BERI, on behalf of themselves and all 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, a New York 

corporation; TATA CONSULTANCY 

SERVICES, LTD., an Indian corporation; 

and TATA SONS, LTD., an Indian 

corporation, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CV 0963 (VRW) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

FILING OF JOINT CASE 

MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 

[N.D. Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12] 

[Declaration of Michelle M. La Mar filed 

concurrently herewith] 

Case 4:06-cv-00963-CW Document 59 Filed 03/19/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

LA1626486.1 

205625-10005 Case No. CV 06-0963 (VRW) – STIPULATION AND ORDER

Pursuant to this Court’s Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, plaintiffs Gopi Vedachalam 

and Kangana Beri (“Plaintiffs”), and defendants Tata America International Corporation, 

Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. and Tata Sons, Ltd. (“Defendants”), (collectively, the 

“Parties”) by and amongst themselves, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. On March 13, 2007, in conjunction with the Court’s ruling on Defendants’ 

Motion to Compel Arbitration, the Court set the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) 

in this matter for March 27, 2007 and ordered the Parties’ Joint Case Management 

Statement to be filed on March 20, 2007. 

2. Due to a pre-existing scheduling conflict, Plaintiffs’ counsel is unavailable 

for the CMC date currently set by this Court. 

3. Accordingly, the Parties agree to adjourn the date for the CMC to April 3, 

2007 or to the Court’s next available CMC date. 

4. The Parties further agree to extend the date for filing the Joint Case 

Management Statement until March 27, 2007 or seven days before the rescheduled CMC 

should a date other than April 3, 2007 be set by this Court. 

5. Nothing contained in this Stipulation is intended to waive prejudice or alter 

Defendants’ right to seek an additional adjournment of the CMC based upon the filing of a 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 4:06-cv-00963-CW Document 59 Filed 03/19/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 - 

LA1626486.1 

205625-10005 Case No. CV 06-0963 (VRW) – STIPULATION AND ORDER

Motion to Dismiss or on other grounds. 

Dated: March 16, 2007 LOEB & LOEB LLP 

By: /s/ Michelle M. La Mar 

Michelle M. La Mar 

Attorneys for all Defendants 

Dated: March 16, 2007 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 

By: /s/ Kevin J. Smith 

Kevin J. Smith 

Attorneys for all Defendants 

Dated: March 16, 2007 LEIFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & 

BERNSTEIN, LLP 

By: /s/ Kelly M. Dermody 

Kelly M. Dermody 

Attorneys for all Plaintiffs 

Dated: March 16, 2007 RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & 

TINDALL LLP 

By: /s/ Steven M. Tindall 

Steven M. Tindall 

Attorneys for all Plaintiffs 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________________ 

 

Judge, United States District Court 

March 19, 2007

Case 4:06-cv-00963-CW Document 59 Filed 03/19/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 4 - 

LA1626486.1 

205625-10005 Case No. CV 06-0963 (VRW) – STIPULATION AND ORDER

Signature Attestation: 

I, Michelle M. La Mar, hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for 

any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document. 

/s/ Michelle M. La Mar 

Michelle M. La Mar 

Case 4:06-cv-00963-CW Document 59 Filed 03/19/07 Page 4 of 4