Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00517/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00517-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ETUATE SEKONA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

F. CUSTINO, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:16-CV-0517-JAM-CMK-P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 

District of California local rules. 

 On July 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 

within a specified time. The Magistrate Judge has recommended dismissal of Charon and Angle 

as defendants to this action, as well as denial of plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. While 

plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations, he has filed a motion 

requesting voluntary dismissal of defendants Charon and Angle. 

 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 

/ / / 

Case 2:16-cv-00517-DMC Document 73 Filed 09/27/18 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 20, 2018, are adopted in full; 

 2. Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal of defendant Charon and Angle 

(Doc. 71) is granted; 

 3. Defendants Charon and Angle are dismissed and this action shall proceed 

as against defendants Custino and Snow; and 

 4. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 60) is denied. 

DATED: September 27, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez 

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-00517-DMC Document 73 Filed 09/27/18 Page 2 of 2