Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01362/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01362-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 It is noted that the Joint Status Report was filed on

September 20, one day late. Counsel are warned that a future

failure to comply with a Rule 16 filing requirement could result

in sanctions.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK DOUCETTE, )

) 2:05-cv-01362-GEB-KJM

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

v. ) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

) CONFERENCE AND

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; DEPUTY ) FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m) WARNING

MARTIN CROSBY; SERGEANT DAVID )

CUNEO; DEPUTY CORY MOORE and )

DOES 1-100 inclusive, )

)

Defendants. )

)

The Joint Status Report filed September 20, 2005, reveals that

this case is not ready to be scheduled.1 Therefore, the Status (Pretrial

Scheduling) Conference currently scheduled for October 3, 2005, is 

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01362-GEB -KJM Document 8 Filed 09/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 The failure of one or more of the parties to

participate in the preparation of a joint status report does not

excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file a

status report in accordance with this Order. In the event a

party fails to participate as ordered, the party timely

submitting the status report shall include a declaration

explaining why it was unable to obtain the cooperation of the

other party or parties.

2

continued to December 12, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report

shall be filed no later than November 28, 2005.2

Further, Plaintiff is hereby notified that any Defendant not

served by November 4, 2005, could be dismissed from this action without

prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). To avoid

dismissal, a proof of service shall be filed for each served Defendant

no later than November 8, 2005. However, if Plaintiff believes he has

good cause to justify extension of Rule 4(m)’s 120-day service period

for a defendant, that shall be shown in a declaration required to be

filed no later than November 8, 2005. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 Dated: September 21, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01362-GEB -KJM Document 8 Filed 09/23/05 Page 2 of 2