Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01114/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01114-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

 Acacia Media Technologies Corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 New Destiny Internet Group, et al.,

Defendant(s).

 /

NO. C 05-01114 JW 

ORDER FOLLOWING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

 And All Related and/or Consolidated Case Actions

 /

The Court conducted a case management conference on June 14, 2005. Counsels for the

Plaintiff and counsels for all Defendants were present. Defendants from the Central District and the

Arizona District appeared telephonically. 

As to pending motions, the parties stipulated to the following:

1) With respect to the “Adult Entertainment Cases”, Plaintiff voluntarily withdraws its

Motion for Certification of a Defendant Class Action.

2) With respect to the “Cable/Satellite Cases”, Defendants Cable America Corporation,

Cable One, Inc., and NPG Cable, Inc., voluntarily withdraw their Motions for More

Definite Statement.

3) The Plaintiff and Defendants from the Northern District of Ohio and Minnesota

stipulated to Defendants’ Motion to Add Counterclaims.

Case 5:05-cv-01114-JW Document 22 Filed 06/21/05 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

4) Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification of the Role of Rainer Schulz was discussed. The

Court has issued a separate Order proposing to amend the terms of appointment and

allowing the parties a period of time to make any objections. 

5) Plaintiff’s Motion for Consolidation is deemed moot in light of the MDL order.

In light of the MDL order, the Court invites any party who wishes to file a Motion for

Reconsideration of the Court’s Markman Order issued on July 12, 2004 to do so in accordance with

the schedule set forth below. In the motion, the party shall identify the terms for which reconsideration

is sought and any additional terms in the 992 and 702 patents that should be defined. A hearing is set

for September 8 and 9, 2005, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Pursuant to the Local Patent Rules of Court, all

parties shall:

1) No later than July 29, 2005 serve on all other parties Proposed Terms and Claim

Elements for Construction pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-1 and Preliminary Claim

Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-2.

2) No later than August 25, 2005 file a Joint Claim Construction Statement and

Prehearing Statement pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-3. The statement shall be presented in

the following chart format:

Disputed Term Plaintiff’s Proposed

Construction

Defendant’s Proposed

Construction

The parties shall express their proposed construction in a manner suitable for incorporation into a jury

instruction. 

For future case management conference, parties wishing to appear telephonically shall meet

and confer and set up their own conference call in number. The parties shall notify the Courtroom

Deputy Clerk, Mr. Ron Davis, three days prior to the date of conference. 

None of the dates set in this Order may be changed without an order of the Court made after a

motion is duly filed and made pursuant to the Local Rules of this Court.

Dated: June 21, 2005 /s/ James Ware 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01114-JW Document 22 Filed 06/21/05 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Alan P. Block blocka@hbdlawyers.com

Annamarie A. Daley aadaley@rkmc.com

Bradford P. Lyerla blyerla@marshallip.com

David A. York david.york@lw.com

Harold J. McElhinny HmcElhinny@mofo.com

J. Timothy Nardell EfilingJTN@cpdb.com

James Michael Slominski jslominski@hh.com

Jan J. Klohonatz jklohonatz@tcolaw.com

Jason A. Crotty jcrotty@mofo.com

Jeffrey D. Sullivan jeffrey.sullivan@bakerbotts.com

Jeffrey H. Dean jdean@marshallip.com

Jonathan E. Singer singer@fr.com

Juanita R. Brooks brooks@fr.com

Kevin D. Hogg khogg@marshallip.com

Kevin I. Shenkman shenkmank@hbdlawyers.com

Maria K. Nelson mknelson@jonesday.com

Marsha Ellen Mullin memullin@jonesday.com

Michael J. McNamara michael.mcnamara@bakerbotts.com

Mitchell D. Lukin mitch.lukin@bakerbotts.com

Morgan William Tovey mtovey@reedsmith.com

Patrick J. Whalen pwhalen@spencerfane.com

Paul A. Friedman pafriedman@mofo.com

Rachel Krevans rkrevans@mofo.com

Richard R. Patch rrp@cpdb.com

Robert F. Copple rcopple@lrlaw.com

Roderick G. Dorman dormanr@hbdlawyers.com

Stephen E. Taylor staylor@tcolaw.com

Stephen P. Safranski spsafranski@rkmc.com

Todd Glen Miller miller@fr.com

Todd R. Tucker ttucker@rennerotto.com

Victor de Gyarfas vdegyarfas@foley.com

Victor George Savikas vgsavikas@jonesday.com

William J. Robinson wrobinson@foley.com

William R. Overend woverend@reedsmith.com

William R. Woodford woodford@fr.com

Dated: June 21, 2005 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: /s/ JW Chambers 

Ronald L. Davis

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:05-cv-01114-JW Document 22 Filed 06/21/05 Page 3 of 3