Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00594/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00594-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD S. MARTIN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TOWN OF PARADISE, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-0594 JAM AC (PS) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 On February 19, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not 

be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s 

order, nor taken any action to prosecute this case. 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 

prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s orders. See Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. R. 110. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one (21) 

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

//// 

Case 2:15-cv-00594-JAM-AC Document 26 Filed 04/12/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: April 11, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-00594-JAM-AC Document 26 Filed 04/12/16 Page 2 of 2