Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-01000/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-01000-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC YLMO SANFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

G. GUDINO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 18-cv-01000-HSG 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 

REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO OPPOSE SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT MOTION; DENYING 

REQUEST TO STAY OR DISMISS 

SUMMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Re: Dkt. No. 25

Plaintiff has requested a thirty-day extension of time to file his opposition to Defendants’ 

motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, that the Court stay or dismiss the summary 

judgment motion until he has obtained the necessary information to oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 

25. Specifically, Plaintiff states that he will not receive an answer to his interrogatories until April 

15, 2019. The Court will not stay or dismiss the summary judgment motion. However, the Court 

will GRANT Plaintiff a thirty-day extension of time after he has received the requested discovery 

to oppose the summary judgment motion. Plaintiff shall file his opposition to the summary 

judgment motion by May 15, 2019. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after 

the date the opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply 

brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion. 

If Plaintiff finds that he requires another extension of time in order to gather the necessary 

evidence to oppose the motion, he may file another request for an extension of time. In his 

request, he should specify what discovery is sought, how this discovery is relevant to opposing the 

summary judgment motion, and when he expects to receive the discovery. Any requests for 

extensions of time should be filed no later than the deadline sought to be extended and must be 

Case 4:18-cv-01000-HSG Document 26 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

accompanied by a showing of good cause. 

This order terminates Dkt. No. 25.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

4/12/2019

Case 4:18-cv-01000-HSG Document 26 Filed 04/12/19 Page 2 of 2