Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00788/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00788-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Timothy E. Warriner (SB#166128)

Attorney at Law

1725 Capitol Ave.

Sacramento, CA 95814

(916) 443-7141

FAX: (916) 448-5346

Attorney for Petitioner,

MARKELLE NEAL TAYLOR

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARKELLE NEAL TAYLOR, ) No. Civ. S-05-0788 MCE GGH P

)

Petitioner, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER RE

) FILING OF AMENDED PETITION

v. ) AND MOTION TO HOLD ACTION

) IN ABEYANCE

TOM CAREY, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

The parties hereby stipulate to the following:

1. On November 21, 2005 the court ordered petitioner to file an amended petition and

motion to hold action in abeyance pending further exhaustion within 15 days.

2. Due to unforeseen delays in scheduling an attorney-client visit at the prison, counsel for

petitioner is in need of an additional week in which to file the amended petition and

motion. Therefore, both parties agree to a modification of the order, permitting said

matters to be filed on or by December 13, 2005. Any response to the motion by

respondent will be due twenty-one days after the motion is filed; petitioner may file a

reply within seven days thereafter.

DATED: December 6, 2005 /s/ Tim Warriner, counsel for petitioner

DATED: December 6, 2005 /s/ Jesse Witt, Deputy Attorney General, for the 

 respondent

Case 2:05-cv-00788-MCE -GGH Document 14 Filed 12/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, based upon the stipulation of the parties, that an amended

petition and motion to hold action in abeyance pending exhaustion shall be filed on or by

December 13, 2005. Any response to said motion shall be due twenty-one days after the motion

is filed, and petitioner may file a reply within seven days thereafter. The court will schedule oral

argument if it is deemed necessary.

Dated: 12/12/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

___________________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

tay788.stip

Case 2:05-cv-00788-MCE -GGH Document 14 Filed 12/12/05 Page 2 of 2