Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03484/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03484-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING CASES AND SETTING 

SCHEDULE; MASTER FILE NO. 5:06-CV-03484-JF

3193645.1 

BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838 

Email: boris.feldman@wsgr.com 

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838 

Email: nlocker@wsgr.com 

RODNEY G. STRICKLAND, State Bar No. 161934 

Email: rstrickland@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

CLAYTON BASSER-WALL, State Bar No. 209100 

Email: cbasserwall@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

8911 Capital of Texas Highway North 

Westech 360, Suite 3210 

Austin, TX 78759-8497 

Telephone: (512) 338-5407 

Facsimile: (512) 338-5499 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

McAfee, Inc. and Individual Defendants 

Eric Brown, Robert Bucknam, Leslie Denend, 

Robert Dutkowsky, Dale Fuller, Denis O’Leary, 

Robert Pangia, and Liane Wilson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re MCAFEE, INC. DERIVATIVE 

LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL MATTERS 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Master File No. 5:06-cv-03484-JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES 

AND SETTING SCHEDULE ON 

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSES TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED 

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT 

**E-filed 9/21/07**----------------

Case 5:06-cv-03484-JF Document 89 Filed 09/21/07 Page 1 of 10
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING CASES AND SETTING 

SCHEDULE; MASTER FILE NO. 5:06-CV-03484-JF -1- 

3193645.1 

I. CONSOLIDATION OF THE NEWLY FILED WEBB ACTION 

WHEREAS, on August 2, 2007, a new shareholder derivative action (Webb v. Samenuk, 

et al., No. 5:07-cv-04048-PVT) (the “Webb Action”) was filed by one of the law firms that 

represents plaintiffs in this action; and 

WHEREAS, on August 10, 2007, Mr. Webb filed a Notice of Related Case in which he 

informed the Court that his lawsuit arises out of the same transactions and occurrences and 

involves the same or substantially similar issues of law and facts as alleged in this consolidated 

action and requested that the Court consolidate the Webb Action with this action pursuant the 

this Court’s July 12, 2006 Order consolidating two related shareholder derivative actions, which 

provides that “[a]ny other actions now pending or later filed in this Court which arise out of or 

are related to the facts alleged in [this action] shall be consolidated for all purposes, if and when 

they are brought to the Court’s attention”; 

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Webb Action is 

consolidated with this action, and the individual defendants and McAfee shall have no obligation 

to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in the Webb Action. 

II. RESPONSES TO THE AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Order dated August 27, 2007, plaintiffs will file an 

amended consolidated complaint by September 27, 2007 (the “Amended Consolidated 

Complaint”) and McAfee will file a motion to dismiss the Amended Consolidated Complaint by 

October 29, 2007; 

WHEREAS, McAfee intends to move to dismiss the Amended Consolidated Complaint 

on the ground that plaintiffs do not have standing to pursue this action on McAfee’s behalf (the 

“McAfee Standing Motion”); 

WHEREAS, the twenty-three individual defendants and McAfee, which are presently 

represented by thirteen (13) separate law firms, intend to move to dismiss the Amended 

Consolidated Complaint on the grounds that the Amended Consolidated Complaint fails to state 

claims against each of them or otherwise is subject to dismissal even if plaintiffs have standing to 

assert their claims (the “Individuals’ Separate Motions”); 

Case 5:06-cv-03484-JF Document 89 Filed 09/21/07 Page 2 of 10
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING CASES AND SETTING 

SCHEDULE; MASTER FILE NO. 5:06-CV-03484-JF -2- 

3193645.1 

WHEREAS, as this Court recognized in its Order dated January 19, 2007, the significant 

burden and expense of preparing and opposing the Individuals’ Separate Motions, and the 

Court’s consideration of each of them, would be unnecessary if the McAfee Standing Motion is 

granted; and the resources of the parties and the Court are best conserved, and the interests of 

judicial economy are best served, by deferring the filing of the Individuals’ Separate Motions 

until the threshold issue of plaintiffs’ standing to file and maintain a lawsuit on behalf of McAfee 

is resolved by the Court; and 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to defer the briefing of the Individuals’ Separate Motions 

until the threshold issue of plaintiffs’ standing to file and maintain a lawsuit on behalf of McAfee 

is resolved by the Court, pursuant to the briefing structure that this Court previously approved in 

its Order dated January 19, 2007, regarding the Consolidated Complaint. 

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED that McAfee shall file the McAfee 

Standing Motion by October 29, 2007; plaintiffs shall file their opposition no later than 

November 28, 2007; and McAfee shall file its reply no later than December 28, 2007. With the 

exception of the McAfee Standing Motion, the individual defendants and McAfee shall have no 

obligation to move to dismiss or otherwise respond to the Amended Consolidated Complaint 

until the Standing Motion is resolved. Following the Court’s resolution of the McAfee Standing 

Motion, the parties shall meet and confer regarding a schedule for any necessary response to the 

Amended Consolidated Complaint. 

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ Clayton Basser-Wall 

Boris Feldman 

Nina F. Locker 

Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 

Clayton Basser-Wall 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

8911 Capital of Texas Highway North 

Westech 360, Suite 3210 

Case 5:06-cv-03484-JF Document 89 Filed 09/21/07 Page 3 of 10
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING CASES AND SETTING 

SCHEDULE; MASTER FILE NO. 5:06-CV-03484-JF -3- 

3193645.1 

Austin, TX 78759 

Telephone:(512) 338-5407 

Facsimile: (512) 338-5499 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

McAfee, Inc. and Individual Defendants 

Eric Brown, Robert Bucknam, Leslie Denend, 

Robert Dutkowsky, Dale Fuller, Denis O’Leary, 

Robert Pangia, and Liane Wilson 

I, Clayton Basser-Wall, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that R. James Slaughter has concurred in this filing.

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ R. James Slaughter 

Elliot R. Peters 

R. James Slaughter 

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Individual Defendant 

 Geroge Samenuk 

 I, Clayton Basser-Wall, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that N. Scott Fletcher has concurred in this filing.

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ N. Scott Fletcher 

N. Scott Fletcher 

Michael C. Holmes 

VINSON & ELKINS LLP 

1001 Fannin – Suite 2500 

Houston, TX 77002-6760 

Telephone: (713) 758-3234 

Facsimile: (713) 615-5168 

John Potter 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

 OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

50 California Street, #22 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for Individual Defendant 

 Kevin Weiss 

Case 5:06-cv-03484-JF Document 89 Filed 09/21/07 Page 4 of 10
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING CASES AND SETTING 

SCHEDULE; MASTER FILE NO. 5:06-CV-03484-JF -4- 

3193645.1 

 I, Clayton Basser-Wall, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that William Goodman has concurred in this filing.

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ William M. Goodman 

William M. Goodman 

Andrea P. DeShazo 

Raphael M. Goldman 

TOPEL & GOODMAN 

832 Sansome Street, 4th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-6140 

Facsimile: (415) 398-5030 

Attorneys for Individual Defendant 

 Evan Collins 

 I, Clayton Basser-Wall, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that Joshua Reiten has concurred in this filing.

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ Joshua A. Reiten 

Sarah A. Good 

Clara J. Shin 

Joshua A. Reiten 

HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY 

FALK & RABKIN 

A Professional Corporation 

Three Embarcadero Center, Seventh Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 434-1600 

Facsimile: (415) 217-5910 

Attorneys for Individual Defendant 

 Sylvia Garcia-Lechelt 

Case 5:06-cv-03484-JF Document 89 Filed 09/21/07 Page 5 of 10
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING CASES AND SETTING 

SCHEDULE; MASTER FILE NO. 5:06-CV-03484-JF -5- 

3193645.1 

 I, Clayton Basser-Wall, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that DeMaurice Smith has concurred in this filing.

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ DeMaurice F. Smith 

DeMaurice F. Smith 

Heather M. McPhee 

PATTON BOGGS LLP 

2550 M. St. NW 

Washington, DC 20037 

Telephone: (202) 457-6000 

Facsimile: (202) 457-6315 

Attorneys for Individual Defendant 

 Virginia Gemmell 

I, Clayton Basser-Wall, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that Mary Jo Johnson has concurred in this filing.

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ Mary Jo Johnson 

Mary Jo Johnson 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & 

DORR LLP 

60 State Street 

Boston, MA 02109 

Telephone: (617) 526-6750 

Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 

Elizabeth I. Rogers 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & 

DORR LLP 

1117 S. California Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 858-6042 

Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 

Attorneys for Individual Defendant 

 Prabhat Goyal 

Case 5:06-cv-03484-JF Document 89 Filed 09/21/07 Page 6 of 10
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING CASES AND SETTING 

SCHEDULE; MASTER FILE NO. 5:06-CV-03484-JF -6- 

3193645.1 

I, Clayton Basser-Wall, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that John Stigi has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ John P. Stigi III 

John P. Stigi III

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & 

HAMPTON LLP 

333 South Hope Street 

Forty-Eighth Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 617-5589 

Facsimile: (213) 620-1398 

Attorneys for Individual Defendant Edwin Harper 

 I, Clayton Basser-Wall, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that Darryl Rains has concurred in this filing.

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ Darryl Rains 

Eugene Illovsky 

MORRISON & FOERSTER 

101 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 450 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: (925) 295-3300 

Facsimile: (925) 946-9912 

Darryl P. Rains 

MORRISON & FOERSTER 

755 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 813-5600 

Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 

Attorneys for Individual Defendant 

 William Larson 

Case 5:06-cv-03484-JF Document 89 Filed 09/21/07 Page 7 of 10
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING CASES AND SETTING 

SCHEDULE; MASTER FILE NO. 5:06-CV-03484-JF -7- 

3193645.1 

I, Clayton Basser-Wall, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that William Freeman has concurred in this filing.

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ William Freeman 

William S. Freeman 

Mary Beth O’Connor 

Brandon J. Kimura 

COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP 

Five Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 

Telephone: (650) 843-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 857-0663 

Attorneys for Individual Defendant 

Kent Roberts 

I, Clayton Basser-Wall, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that Norman Blears has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ Norman J. Blears 

Norman J. Blears 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

275 Middlefield Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-3506 

Telephone: (650) 324-7000 

Facsimile: (650) 324-0638 

Attorneys for Individual Defendants 

Dennis Cline, Arthur Matin, Zachary Nelson, 

Stephen Richards, and Peter Watkins 

Case 5:06-cv-03484-JF Document 89 Filed 09/21/07 Page 8 of 10
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING CASES AND SETTING 

SCHEDULE; MASTER FILE NO. 5:06-CV-03484-JF -8- 

3193645.1 

I, Clayton Basser-Wall, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 

this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that Shawn Williams has concurred in this filing.

Dated: September 18, 2007 By: /s/ Shawn A. Williams 

 Shawn A. Williams 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

100 Pine Street, Ste. 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 288-4545 

Facsimile: (415) 288-4534 

Travis E. Downs III 

Benny C.Goodman III 

 Thomas G. Wilhelm 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: (619) 231-1058 

Facsimile: (619) 231-7423 

SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP 

Eric L. Zagar 

Sean M. Handler 

 Robin Winchester 

James H. Miller 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

Telephone: 610/667-7706 

610/667-7056 (fax) 

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Case 5:06-cv-03484-JF Document 89 Filed 09/21/07 Page 9 of 10
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONSOLIDATING CASES AND SETTING 

SCHEDULE; MASTER FILE NO. 5:06-CV-03484-JF -9- 

3193645.1 

* * * 

ORDER 

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, and for good cause, 

1. The Webb Action: The Webb Action is consolidated with this consolidated 

action; and the individual defendants and McAfee shall have no obligation to answer or 

otherwise respond to the complaint in the Webb Action. 

2. The McAfee Standing Motion: Pursuant to this Court’s Order dated August 27, 

2007, McAfee shall file the McAfee Standing Motion in response to the Amended Consolidated 

Complaint by October 29, 2007; plaintiffs shall file their opposition by November 28, 2007; and 

McAfee shall file its reply by December 28, 2007. 

3. The Individuals’ Separate Motions: Other than as set forth in Section 2, above, 

the individual defendants and McAfee shall have no obligation to move to dismiss or otherwise 

respond to the Amended Consolidated Complaint until the McAfee Standing Motion is resolved. 

Following the Court’s resolution of the McAfee Standing Motion, the parties shall meet and 

confer regarding a schedule for any necessary response to the Amended Consolidated Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

9/21/07

Case 5:06-cv-03484-JF Document 89 Filed 09/21/07 Page 10 of 10