Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01769/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01769-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Shane Monroe Bowden is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 23, 2019, the Court issued an order striking Plaintiff’s complaint for lack of 

signature as required by Local Rule 131 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a). (ECF No. 5.) 

Plaintiff was directed to file a complaint, signed under penalty of perjury with an original signature 

within thirty days. (Id.) Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s order and the time to do so has 

now expired. 

Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of ... a party to comply ... with any order of the Court 

may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or 

within the inherent power of the Court.” Further, a plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders and 

SHANE MONROE BOWDEN,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, et.al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:19-cv-01769-SAB (PC)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE 

TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

[ECF No. 5]

Case 1:19-cv-01769-AWI-HBK Document 11 Filed 02/04/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

prosecute their action is grounds for dismissal. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability 

Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226-29 (9th Cir. 2006). 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of 

service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to 

comply with a court order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2020 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-01769-AWI-HBK Document 11 Filed 02/04/20 Page 2 of 2