Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01766/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01766-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE HEARING ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS 1

GARY BRICKWOOD, State Bar No. 94892

MONIQUE GRANDAW, State Bar No. 162451

BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE

1135 Pine Street, Suite 210

Redding, CA 96001

(530) 245-1877

(530) 245-1879 (fax)

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TINA BRUCE, JAYME BRUCE, a

minor, by and through her

Guardian Ad Litem, Tina Bruce,

and JESSICA BRUCE, a minor, by

and through her Guardian Ad

Litem, Tina Bruce, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, 

BOBCAT COMPANY,

MELROE COMPANY, 

INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 2:05-CV-01766-WBS-KJM

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING

HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

The parties hereto, by and through their respective attorneys of

record, hereby stipulate as follows:

Defendants Ingersoll-Rand Company and Clark Equipment Company

have filed motions for summary judgment that are currently scheduled

for February 20, 2007. The Court’s scheduling order was previously

modified to change the trial date and discovery dates in this action.

However, the Court did not change the law and motion cut-off date

accordingly. Consequently, plaintiff has not had sufficient

opportunity to complete discovery in this matter. Currently,

Case 2:05-cv-01766-WBS -KJM Document 33 Filed 01/26/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE HEARING ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS 2

depositions necessary to properly oppose the motion are scheduled for

February 14, 2007. 

The parties therefore agree that the hearing date for the motions

for summary judgment should be continued to allow plaintiffs the

opportunity to conduct these depositions.

THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties

hereto that the hearing date of February 20, 2007, be continued, and

that the motions for summary judgment be heard on March 19, 2007, at

1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable William B. Shubb.

Oppositions and reply briefs shall be filed and served in accordance

with the requirements of the local rules of the Eastern District.

DATED: 1/26, 2007. BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE

/s/ MONIQUE GRANDAW 

MONIQUE GRANDAW

Attorney for Plaintiffs

DATED: 1/25, 2007. DRYDEN, MARGOLES, SCHIMANECK &

WERTZ

/s/ SUSAN FOE 

SUSAN FOE

SUSAN E. FOE

Attorney for Defendant

INGERSOLL RAND COMPANY and CLARK

EQUIPMENT COMPANY

ORDER

The parties having stipulated thereto, and good cause existing,

it is hereby ordered that the hearing date of February 20, 2007, be

continued, and that the motions for summary judgment of defendants

Clark Equipment Company and Ingersoll Rand Company be heard on March

19, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before the undersigned.

Case 2:05-cv-01766-WBS -KJM Document 33 Filed 01/26/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE HEARING ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS 3

Oppositions and reply briefs shall be filed and served in accordance

with the requirements of the local rules of the Eastern District. 

DATED: January 26, 2007

Case 2:05-cv-01766-WBS -KJM Document 33 Filed 01/26/07 Page 3 of 3