Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-01604/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-01604-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KING SOLOMON,

Plaintiff,

v.

FNU TAPIA, ET. AL.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:22-cv-1604-ADA-HBK (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF No. 8)

Plaintiff King Solomon (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action proceeding pro se by filing a 

complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to the assigned United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On January 4, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued a findings and recommendations

recommending the district court deny Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No.

8.) The findings and recommendations served on Plaintiff contained notice that any objections 

were due within fourteen days. (Id. at 1, 4.) Plaintiff filed objections on January 17, 2023. (ECF 

No. 9.) Plaintiff argues he paid the $402.00 filing fee on this case and attaches a copy of his inmate 

statement report showing that a $402.00 filing fee was paid on May 10, 2022. (Id. at 2-3). Despite 

Plaintiff’s assertion, he initiated this case on December 15, 2022, and could not pay the filing fee 

for the instant action which was commenced after May 10, 2022. (See ECF No. 1). 

///

Case 1:22-cv-01604-KES-HBK Document 10 Filed 02/15/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings 

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

ACCORDINGLY, 

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on January 4, 2023, (ECF No. 8), are 

adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff is directed to pay the full filing fee in this matter if he wishes to proceed; and

3. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action for failure to 

prosecute and/or comply with the court’s orders. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 14, 2023 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-01604-KES-HBK Document 10 Filed 02/15/23 Page 2 of 2