Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-01486/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-01486-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

Guy W. Chambers,<gwchambers@townsend.com> (SBN 101611) 

TOWNSEND TOWNSEND & CREW LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3834 

Telephone: (415) 576-0200 

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 

Edwin I. Lasman, <edwin.lasman@telemac.com> (SBN 105943) 

TELEMAC CORPORATION 

6701 Center Drive West, Suite 700 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

Telephone: (310) 568-6514 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, TELEMAC CORPORATION

Tammy S. Wood, <tammyw@bellnunnally.com> 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

Jeffrey S. Lowenstein, <jeffl@bellnunnally.com> 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

Neal J. Suit, <neals@bellnunnally.com> 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

BELL NUNNALLY & MARTIN LLP 

3232 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1400 

Dallas, TX 75204 

Telephone: (214) 740-1400 

Facsimile: (214) 740-1499 

Matthew T. Powers, <mpowers@sidley.com> (SBN 124493) 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Attorneys for Defendants, PHONETEC, LP 

And PHONETEC PCS, LLC 

TELEMAC CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TELEMAC CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

PHONETEC LP, a Texas Limited Partnership; 

PHONETEC PCS, LLC, A Texas Limited 

Liability Company; and DOES 1 through 20, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Civil Action No.: C 04-1486 CW 

STIPULATION AND 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 17
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of some 

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be 

warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the 

following protective order. The Parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 9, below, 

that this Stipulated Protective Order creates no entitlement to file confidential information under 

seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the 

standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file materials 

under seal. 

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 

consultants, retained experts, and Counsel (and their support staff). 

2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 

medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 

transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 

discovery in this matter. 

2.3 “Confidential” Information or Items: information (regardless of how generated, 

stored or maintained) or tangible things that constitutes a trade secret or other confidential 

research, development, or commercial information. 

2.4 “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or Items: extremely 

sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” whose disclosure to another Party or non-party 

would create a substantial risk of serious injury. 

2.5 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 

Producing Party. 

2.6 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 

Material in this action. 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 17
3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

2.7. Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or items that it 

produces, or permits to be produced, in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” 

or “Highly Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

2.8 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 

“Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” Protected Material includes 

any information copied or extracted from Protected Material, as well as all copies, excerpts, 

summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or 

Counsel to or in court or in other settings that reveals Protected Material. 

2.9. Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but 

who are retained to represent or advise a party to this action. 

2.10 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. 

2.11 Counsel: (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well as their 

support staffs). 

2.12 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 

the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 

consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or of a competitor 

of a Party and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party 

or a competitor of a Party. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained 

in connection with this litigation. 

2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 

(e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; organizing, 

storing, and retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 

3. DURATION

 Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 

this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court 

order otherwise directs. 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 3 of 17
4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

4. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

4.1 Exercise of Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or non-party 

that designates information or items for protection under this Order must review the Disclosure 

or Discovery Material and take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 

qualifies under the appropriate standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for 

protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that 

qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which 

protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 

 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that 

are shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose unnecessary 

expenses and burdens on other parties), expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 

 If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items that it 

designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of 

protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it 

is withdrawing the mistaken designation. To be effective, such notice must be in writing from, 

or stated on the record by, Counsel of record for the Designating Party. 

4.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, 

or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Order must 

be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 

 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 

(a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions or 

of other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” at the top 

of each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a 

page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 

portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 4 of 17
5 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

portion, the level of protection being asserted (either “Confidential” Or “Highly Confidential – 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only”). 

A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for 

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has 

indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and 

before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed 

“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” After the inspecting Party has identified 

the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which 

documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, then, before 

producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend 

and notations as specified in the preceding paragraph. 

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that 

the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, before the 

close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further specify 

any portions of the testimony that qualify as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to 

protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for 

protection, the Party or non-party that sponsors, offers, or gives the testimony may invoke on the 

record (before the deposition or proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to 30 days to identify 

the specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of 

protection being asserted (“Confidential” Or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only”). 

Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 

30 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Order. Until expiration of the 30 day 

designation period, the entire transcript with exhibits shall be considered “Highly Confidential – 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only”. 

Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by the 

court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend CONFIDENTIAL” or 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 5 of 17
6 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as instructed by the Party or 

non-party offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony. 

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for any 

other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the 

container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” 

or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only portions of the 

information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall 

identify the protected portions, specifying whether they qualify as “Confidential” or as “Highly 

Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 

4.3 Inadvertent Failures to Properly Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent 

failure to designate qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive, or otherwise prejudice, the Designating 

Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Under such circumstances, 

the Producing Party shall provide the Receiving Party with timely written notice and any 

properly designated materials to replace the improperly designated materials, and the Receiving 

Party must retrieve and destroy the original and all copies of the improperly designated materials 

in its possession and that have been disseminated and make reasonable efforts to assure that the 

materials are treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. Compliance by the 

Receiving Party with this paragraph shall not constitute an admission that the materials are 

properly designated, and shall not in any way prejudice any party from moving the court for an 

order that such materials have been improperly designated. 

The inadvertent production of any Disclosure or Discovery Material does not, standing 

alone, waive, or otherwise prejudice, any claim by any person that such material is privileged or 

otherwise protected under the attorney-client privilege, work product immunity, or any other 

applicable privilege or protection. Under such circumstances, upon written notice from the 

Producing Party, the Receiving Party shall return the original and all copies of such materials in 

its possession and that it has disseminated, and shall not use such information for any purpose 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 6 of 17
7 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

until further order of the court. Return of the such materials by the Receiving Party shall not 

constitute an admission that the materials are properly subject to the claimed privilege or 

protection, and shall not in any way prejudice any party from moving the court for an order that 

such materials have been improperly designated or should be produced for reasons other than an 

alleged waiver caused by the inadvertent production. 

5. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

5.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s 

confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary 

economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not 

waive, or otherwise prejudice, its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not 

to mount a challenge promptly after a designation is disclosed. 

5.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating 

Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by 

conferring directly (through direct voice to voice dialogue) with Counsel of record for the 

Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that 

the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an 

opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change 

in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A challenging Party 

may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and 

confer process first. 

5.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a confidentiality 

designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party may file and 

serve a motion that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the 

challenge. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that 

the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding 

paragraph and that sets forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation 

that was given by the Designating Party in the meet and confer dialogue. 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 7 of 17
8 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating 

Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the material in 

question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation. 

6. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

6.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed 

or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, 

defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only 

to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. Without limiting 

the generality of this section, the Receiving Party shall not use Protected Material for any 

business, competitive, patent prosecution, or other litigation purpose, and shall not disclose such 

information to anyone except as provided herein. 

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and 

in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 

When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of 

section 11, below (FINAL DISPOSITION). 

6.2 Disclosure of “Confidential” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by 

the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any 

information or item designated “Confidential” only to: 

(a) the Receiving Party’s Counsel of record in this action and House Counsel, as 

well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information 

for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is 

attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

(b) the officers and directors of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 8 of 17
9 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

(c) Experts (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, (2) 

who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A), and (3) as to 

whom the procedures set forth in section 7.4 have been followed; 

(d) the court and its personnel; 

(e) court reporters, their staffs, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” 

(Exhibit A) (Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal 

Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to 

anyone except as permitted under this Order.); 

(g) persons shown to have prepared or previously received the Protected 

Material; and 

(h) persons whom the Designating Party agrees may be shown the Protected 

Material. 

6.3 Disclosure of “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or 

Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 

Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “Highly Confidential – 

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” only to: 

(a) the Receiving Party’s [Outside] Counsel of record in this action, as well as 

employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for 

this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is 

attached hereto as Exhibit A; 

(b) Experts (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, (2) 

who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A), and (3) as to 

whom the procedures set forth in section 7.4 have been followed; 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 9 of 17
10 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

(c) the court and its personnel; 

(d) court reporters, their staffs, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by 

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and 

(e) persons shown to have prepared or previously received the Protected 

Material. 

6.4 Procedures for Approving Disclosure of Protected Material to Experts

(a) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed in writing by the Designating 

Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert any Protected Material first must make a written 

request to the Designating Party that (1) sets forth the full name of the Expert and the city and 

state of his or her primary residence, and (2) identifies the Expert’s current employer(s) and 

positions held for the past 10 years 

(b) A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the 

preceding paragraph may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified Expert unless, 

within seven court days of delivering the request, the Party receives a written objection from the 

Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in detail the grounds on which it is based. 

The Designating Party may object on the grounds that the proposed Expert is or was an 

employee of, or otherwise associated with, a competitor of the Designating Party. 

(c) a Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with the 

Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by 

agreement. If no agreement is reached, the Party seeking to prevent the disclosure to the Expert 

may file a motion seeking permission from the court to do so. Any such motion must describe 

the circumstances with specificity, and assess the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail. In 

addition, any such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration in which the movant 

describes the parties’ efforts to resolve the matter by agreement (i.e., the extent and the content 

of the meet and confer discussions) and sets forth the reasons advanced by the Designating Party 

for its refusal to approve the disclosure. If the Designating Party does not file a motion in 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 10 of 17
11 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

accordance with this paragraph to prevent the disclosure within fifteen (15) days of service of its 

written objection, then the objection is deemed waived, and the Party receiving the written 

objection may disclose the Protected Material to the Expert. 

In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to the Expert shall bear the 

burden of persuasion that the risk of harm entailed in disclosure to a specific Expert outweighs 

the Receiving Party’s need to disclose to that Expert. 

6.5 “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” Counsel of record for a Receiving 

Party shall maintain the signed copies of the “Agreements to Be Bound by Protective Order” 

(Exhibit A). 

6.6 Summary of “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” In order to permit 

directors and officers of the Receiving Party to review information relating to the computation of 

damages that is marked “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only”, the Receiving Party’s 

[Outside] Counsel of record (and its support staff) should distill such information into a 

summary, provide the Designating Party with the summary, request the Designating Party to 

designate the summary as “Confidential”, and use the procedure in section 6 to reach an 

agreement, or obtain a court order, designating such a summary as “Confidential”. 

7. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER 

 LITIGATION. 

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that 

would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “Confidential” 

or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” the Receiving Party must so notify the 

Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) immediately and in no event more than three 

court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the 

subpoena or court order. 

 The Receiving Party also must immediately notify in writing the party who caused the 

subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the 

subpoena or order is the subject of this Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must deliver a 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 11 of 17
12 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

copy of this Order promptly to the Party in the other action that caused the subpoena or order to 

issue. 

The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of 

this Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its 

confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The Designating 

Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking protection in that court of its 

confidential material – and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or 

encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 

8. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Order, the Receiving 

Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized 

disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the 

person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, 

and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be 

Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

9. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL. 

 Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order secured after 

appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this action 

any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply 

with Civil Local Rule 79-5. 

10. FINAL DISPOSITION. 

 Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within ninety days 

after the final termination of this action, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material 

to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, 

abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of the 

Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating Party, the Receiving Party 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 12 of 17
13 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether the Protected 

Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the 

Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the ninety 

day deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was 

returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, 

abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the 

Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel, as appropriate for the designated 

level of protection, are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, 

transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if such materials 

contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected 

Material remain subject to this Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION), above. 

11. MISCELLANEOUS

11.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to 

seek its modification by the court in the future, including without limitation, that particular 

Disclosure or Discovery Material be treated more restrictively than otherwise provided for 

herein. 

11.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. Stipulating to the entry of, and performing 

under, this Order, does not waives, or otherwise prejudice, any right a Party would otherwise 

have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in 

this Order. Similarly, stipulating to the entry of, and performing under, this Order, does not 

waive, or otherwise prejudice, any right to object on any ground to the use in evidence of any 

Disclosure or Discovery Material. 

11.3 Limited Scope. This Order has no effect upon the admissibility of any document, 

testimony, or other evidence at trial. This Order has no effect upon, and its scope shall not 

extend to, any party’s use of its own confidential information. Stipulating to the entry of, and 

performing under, this Order does not (a) constitute an admission that any Disclosure or 

Discovery Material is a trade secret or confidential, or (b) waive, or otherwise prejudice, any 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 13 of 17
14 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

claim by any person that any Disclosure or Discovery Material is privileged or otherwise 

protected under the attorney-client privilege, work product immunity, or any other applicable 

privilege or protection. 

If a Receiving Party is legally obligated to disclose Protected Material to a governmental 

taxing authority or any other regulatory or administrative agency, the Receiving Party may do so 

provided that (a) where circumstances permit, it gives the Designating Party sufficient prior 

written notice to afford the Designating Party, at its sole expense, an opportunity to try to protect 

its confidentiality interests by seeking an appropriate remedy against the intended disclosure by 

the Receiving Party and (b) in any event, the Receiving Party discloses only so much of the 

Protected Material as is necessary to comply with its legal obligation. 

 11.4 Deposition Attendees. Attendees at depositions in which confidential testimony is 

given or Protected Materials are discussed shall be limited during disclosure to those entitled to 

disclosure under this Order. 

 11.5 New Parties. Parties that are joined, added, or substituted into this action shall not 

have access to Protected Materials until the new Party, or its Counsel, has executed, and filed 

with the court, its agreement to be bound by this Order or such other protective order as the court 

may issue. 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 14 of 17
15 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

Dated: August 1, 2006 By: /s/Matthew T. Powers 

Matthew T. Powers 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 PHONETEC LP and PHONETEC PCS, LLC 

BELL NUNNALLY & MARTIN LLP 

Dated: August 1, 2006 By: /s/ Tammy S. Wood 

Tammy S. Wood 

Attorney for Defendants 

 PHONETEC LP and PHONETEC PCS, LLC 

 TELEMAC CORPORATION 

Dated: August 1, 2006 By: /s/ Edwin I. Lasman 

 Edwin I. Lasman 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 TELEMAC CORPOARTION 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

Dated: August 1, 2006 By: /s/ Guy W. Chambers 

Guy W. Chambers 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

TELEMAC CORPORATION 

DECLARATION

 The undersigned attests that concurrence in this filing has been obtained from all of the 

above signatories. 

 By: /s/ Tammy S. Wood 

Tammy S. Wood 

Attorney for Defendants 

 PHONETEC LP and PHONETEC PCS, LLC 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 15 of 17
16 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

 8/10/06 /s/ CLAUDIA WILKEN 

Dated: ______________ By: 

Honorable Claudia Wilken 

U.S. District Court Judge 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 16 of 17
17 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER – CASE NO. C 04-1486 CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

EXHIBIT A 

AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY PROTECTIVE ORDER 

I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of _________________ [print or 

type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand 

the Stipulation and Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California on _____________________, 2006 in the case of Telemac 

Corporation v. Phonetec LP and Phonetec PCS, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. C-04-1486 (this 

“Order”). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Order and I understand 

and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the 

nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose or use in any manner any 

information or item that is subject to this Order to any person or entity except in strict 

compliance with the provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the 

United States District Court for the Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing 

the terms of this Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this 

action. I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 

_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone 

number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any 

proceedings related to enforcement of this Order. 

Date: _________________________________ 

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ 

Printed name: ______________________________ [printed name] 

Signature: __________________________________ [signature] 

Case 4:04-cv-01486-CW Document 80 Filed 08/10/06 Page 17 of 17