Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02847/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02847-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

MCKENNA LONG &

ALDRIDGE LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

- 1 - STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

CASE NO. C-07-2847 SI 

DAVID HUGHES (BAR NO. 88738) 

LAUGHLIN, FALBO, LEVY & MORESI LLP 

255 California Street, Ste. 600 

San Francisco, CA 94111

415/781-6676 (phone); 415/781-6823 (fax)

Attorney for Insurance Company of the State of 

Pennsylvania 

LISA L. OBERG (BAR NO. 120139) 

SARA M. PARKER (BAR NO. 238448) 

MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP 

101 California Street, 41st Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

415/267-4000 (phone); 415/267-4198 (fax)

Attorneys for EOD Technology, Inc. and EODT Security 

Services, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE 

STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

EOD TECHNOLOGY, INC.; EODT 

SECURITY SERVICES, INC.; ALI 

FALAH HANSON; and DOES 1 to 100, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C-07-2847 SI 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO ANSWER, MOVE AGAINST, 

OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PURSUANT 

TO NORTHERN DISTRICT LOCAL 

RULE 6-1(A)

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“Plaintiff”) filed 

the above-entitled action in California Superior Court for the County of San Francisco on or about 

March 5, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Defendants EOD Technology, Inc. and EODT Security Services, Inc. 

(“Defendants”) removed the above-captioned matter to the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California on May 31, 2007; 

Case 3:07-cv-02847-SI Document 19 Filed 08/10/07 Page 1 of 2
MCKENNA LONG &

ALDRIDGE LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

- 2 - STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

CASE NO. C-07-2847 SI 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the previous stipulation by the parties, filed July 19, 2007, 

Defendants must answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the Complaint no later than 

August 13, 2007; 

WHEREAS, a parallel action was filed in Alabama federal court, entitled Joseph Dwyer 

v. EOD Technology, Inc., Civil Action No. 5:07-cv-0411-CLS (N.D. Ala., filed Mar. 7, 2007), 

and the parties are discussing the most efficient manner to handle the two pending actions; 

WHEREAS, under Northern District Local Rule 6-1(a), parties are permitted to “stipulate 

in writing, without a Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond 

to the complaint . . . provided the change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline 

already fixed by Court order.” 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through 

their undersigned counsel that Defendants shall answer, move against, or otherwise respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint no later than August 27, 2007. 

Dated: August 10, 2007 /s/ (w/ express permission) 

DAVID HUGHES (BAR NO. 88738) 

LAUGHLIN, FALBO, LEVY & MORESI LLP 

255 California Street, Ste. 600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

415/781-6676 (phone); 415/781-6823 (fax) 

Attorney for Insurance Company of the State of 

Pennsylvania 

Dated: August 10, 2007 /s/ Sara M. Parker 

LISA L. OBERG (BAR NO. 120139) 

SARA M. PARKER (BAR NO. 238448) 

MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP 

101 California Street, 41st Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

415/267-4000 (phone); 415/267-4198 (fax) 

Attorneys for Defendants EOD Technology, Inc. 

U

and EODT Security Services, Inc. NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Susan Illston

08/10/07

Case 3:07-cv-02847-SI Document 19 Filed 08/10/07 Page 2 of 2