Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-01153/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-01153-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:402 Social Security Benefits

---

Stip. for Ext.; 1:23-cv-01289-NODJ-GSA 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILLIP TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE, WSBA No. 32245

Associate General Counsel

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 

Social Security Administration

MARY TSAI, CSBN 216963

Special Assistant United States Attorney

6401 Security Boulevard

Baltimore, MD 21235

Telephone: 510-970-4864

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: mary.tsai@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

NANCY MCCARTER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:23-cv-01153-JLT-BAM

STIPULATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF 

TIME; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pending the Court’s approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the 

parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to 

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be extended fourteen (14) days from February 28, 

2024, up to and including March 14, 2024. This is the parties’ third stipulation for an extension 

of the Court’s Scheduling Order, and Defendant’s first extension. 

This is Defendant’s first request for an extension, and it is made with good cause. This 

case was recently reassigned to undersigned counsel for Defendant, along with another brief, 

both of which were due on February 28, 2024. Moreover, counsel already has another brief due 

that day and approximately five briefs due by early March. Thus, Defendant requires an 

Case 1:23-cv-01153-JLT-BAM Document 17 Filed 02/12/24 Page 1 of 3
Stip. for Ext.; 1:23-cv-01289-NODJ-GSA 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

extension in this case, and may require extensions in other cases, and requests this extension in 

good faith and with no intent to delay these proceedings unnecessarily.

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified 

accordingly. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: February 9, 2024 /s/ Jonathan Omar Pena* 

JONATHAN OMAR PENA

Attorney for Plaintiff

*as authorized via e-mail on February 9, 2024

Dated: February 9, 2024 PHILLIP TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE

Associate General Counsel

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

Social Security Administration

By: /s/ Mary Tsai 

MARY TSAI

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:23-cv-01153-JLT-BAM Document 17 Filed 02/12/24 Page 2 of 3
Stip. for Ext.; 1:23-cv-01289-NODJ-GSA 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED that 

Defendant shall have an extension, up to and including March 14, 2024, to respond to Plaintiff’s 

motion for summary judgment. All other dates in the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be 

extended accordingly. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2024 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:23-cv-01153-JLT-BAM Document 17 Filed 02/12/24 Page 3 of 3