Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-00554/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-00554-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)

Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)

Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor

San Jose, California 95110

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN JOSE DIVISION

KARI ROBERTS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC.; et. al.,

Defendants.

Federal Case No.: 5:16-CV-00554-EJD

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT TD BANK 

USA, N.A. PURSUANT TO FEDERAL 

RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Kari Roberts, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant TD Bank USA, N.A. as to all claims 

in this action. 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, in relevant part:

41(a) Voluntary Dismissal 

(1) By the Plaintiff

(a) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(3), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any 

applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court 

order by filing: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Edward J. Davila

Case 5:16-cv-00554-EJD Document 77 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT 

a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a 

motion for summary judgment. 

Defendant TD Bank USA, N.A. has neither answered Plaintiff’s Complaint, nor filed a 

motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the matter may be dismissed against it for all 

purposes and without an Order of the Court. 

Dated: July 27, 2016 Sagaria Law, P.C. 

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Kari Roberts

Case 5:16-cv-00554-EJD Document 77 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 2