Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-05-02635/USCOURTS-ca8-05-02635-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2635

___________

Bobby F. McReynolds, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

Randy Johnson, Sheriff, Pulaski *

County; Randy Morgan, Jail *

Administrator, Pulaski County Jail; *

Maximum Health Care Service; Carl *

Johnson, Dr., Pulaski County Jail; *

Sarah Speer, Nurse, Pulaski County *

Jail, originally sued as Carol *

Spheres; Pulaski County Jail; *

Glenda Moore, Sgt., originally sued as *

Moore; James Bozeman, Officer, *

originally sued as Bozeman; Derek * Appeal from the United States

Grist, Officer, originally sued as * District Court for the

Grist; Jane Does, 3 Nurses employed * Eastern District of Arkansas.

by Maximum Health Care, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

-------------------------------------------------

Bobby F. McReynolds, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Randy Johnson, Sheriff, Pulaski *

County Jail; Randy Morgan, Jail *

Appellate Case: 05-2635 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2006 Entry ID: 2074311
1

The Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

Administrator, Pulaski County Jail, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: July 20, 2006

Filed: August 3, 2006

___________

Before BYE, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas prisoner Bobby McReynolds appeals the district court’s1

 order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action after a pretrial evidentiary hearing.

McReynolds claimed that defendants showed deliberate indifference to his medical

needs by neglecting to schedule and take him to a post-hernia-surgery follow-up

appointment, and by placing him on a top bunk after his surgery contrary to medical

orders for a lower bunk assignment. In dismissing McReynolds’s complaint, the court

relied in part on the absence of harm caused by the missed appointment, and on

McReynolds’s failure to show that any defendant was personally responsible for any

unconstitutional action. Following careful review, see Johnson v. Bi-State Justice

Ctr., 12 F.3d 133, 135-36 (8th Cir. 1993) (standard of review), we affirm. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 05-2635 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/03/2006 Entry ID: 2074311