Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-06058/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-06058-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CHANG MIN LU, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PACIFIC RIM ENTERPRISES, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 09-6058 PVT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; AND

VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

Plaintiffs filed this action on December 29, 2009. The initial Case Management Conference

was originally scheduled for April 6, 2010. On March 31, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a Case Management

Conference Statement in which they requested a sixty day continuance to allow them to work out

certain matters, including whether the complaint had been properly served. On April 1, 2010, the

court continued the Case Management Conference to June 8, 2010, and set a deadline of June 1,

2010 for the parties to file their Joint Case Management Conference Statement. As of June 4, 2010,

the parties have not filed the Case Management Conference Statement. The court has previously

cautioned Plaintiffs’ counsel that failure to timely file a Case Management Conference Statement

(whether joint or separate) may well result in an order to show cause why the case should not be

dismissed for failure to prosecute. (See Solorio v. Alvarado, Case No. C09-4537, docket no. 19). 

Case 5:09-cv-06058-RMW Document 11 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

Therefore, based on the file herein and the court’s prior warning to Plaintiffs’ counsel,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than June 15, 2010, Plaintiffs’ counsel shall file a

declaration showing cause, if any, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See

FED.R.CIV.PROC. 41(b).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Case Management Conference set for June 8, 2010 is

VACATED.

Dated: June 4, 2010

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:09-cv-06058-RMW Document 11 Filed 06/04/10 Page 2 of 2