Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_10-cv-00020/USCOURTS-almd-2_10-cv-00020-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 _____________________________

TIMOTHY WOODS, #185 448 * 

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:10-CV-20-ID

 (WO)

RAYMOND RODGERS, SHERIFF, *

Defendant. *

 _____________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff filed this complaint on January 7, 2010. On April 28, 2010 he filed a motion

to dismiss the complaint. Upon review of the file in this case, the court concludes that

Plaintiff's motion to dismiss is due to be granted. 

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff's

motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 22) be GRANTED and that this case be dismissed without

prejudice. 

It is further

ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the

Recommendation on or before June 9 , 2010. Any objections filed must specifically identify

the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which a party objects. Frivolous,

conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The parties are

advised that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore, it is not

Case 2:10-cv-00020-ID-CSC Document 25 Filed 05/26/10 Page 1 of 3
2

appealable.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the

Magistrate Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District

Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual

findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain

error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982). See Stein

v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of

Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the

decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on

September 30, 1981.

Done, this 26th day of May 2010.

 /s/ Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-00020-ID-CSC Document 25 Filed 05/26/10 Page 2 of 3
3

Case 2:10-cv-00020-ID-CSC Document 25 Filed 05/26/10 Page 3 of 3