Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04863/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04863-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE 

COMPANY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-04863-JST 

ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE

The Court is in receipt of the parties’ stipulation to extend Court dates and hereby amends 

Court dates as follows:

Event Prior Date Amended Date

Close of Fact Discovery March 9, 2015 October 15, 2015

Mediation Deadline March 31, 2015 December 16, 2015

Designation of Experts March 16, 2015 November 9, 2015

Expert Reports Due April 6, 2015 December 9, 2015

Deadline to File Dispositive Motions April 20, 2015 January 8, 2016

Designation of Rebuttal Experts April 22, 2015 January 12, 2016

Rebuttal Reports Due May 6, 2015 January 29, 2016

Close of Expert Discovery May 29, 2015 February 29, 2016

Case 3:13-cv-04863-JST Document 61 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Pretrial Conference Statement Due July 3, 2015 May 31, 2015

Pretrial Conference

July 13, 2015

at 2:00 p.m.

June 10, 2016

Trial

September 22, 2015 

at 8:30 a.m.

July 5, 2016

Estimate of trial length (in days) 10 10

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2015

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-04863-JST Document 61 Filed 03/19/15 Page 2 of 2