Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05107/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05107-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:15-cv-05107-RS STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP

Karl S. Kronenberger (CA Bar No. 226112)

Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (CA Bar No. 222187)

150 Post Street, Suite 520

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (415) 955-1155

Facsimile: (415) 955-1158

karl@KRInternetLaw.com

jeff@KRInternetLaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant Lead Genesis, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE MORRIS, JOSE ALBINO 

LUCERO JR. and DAVID HALL, on 

behalf of themselves and all others 

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SOLARCITY CORP. and LEAD 

GENESIS, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-cv-05107-RS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF 

INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL 

Case 3:15-cv-05107-RS Document 80 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:15-cv-05107-RS 1STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Plaintiffs George Morris, Jose Albino Lucero Jr., and David Hall (“Plaintiffs”) and

Defendant Lead Genesis, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, 

stipulate that briefing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Appointment of Interim Class Counsel, filed 

on July 12, 2016, shall proceed as follows, subject to the Court’s approval:

1. Defendant’s opposition shall be due on August 2, 2016.

2. Plaintiffs’ reply shall be due on August 9, 2016.

3. The noticed hearing date of September 1, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. will not change.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: July 26, 2016 KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP

By: s/ Jeffery M. Rosenfeld ____

Jeffery M. Rosenfeld

Attorneys for Defendant Lead Genesis, Inc.

DATED: July 26, 2016 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

By: s/ Joshua D. Arisohn___________ 

Joshua D. Arisohn

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DATED: July 26, 2016 NATHAN & ASSOCIATES, APC

By: s/ Reuben D. Nathan___________ 

Reuben D. Nathan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 3:15-cv-05107-RS Document 80 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:15-cv-05107-RS 2STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________, 2016

__________________________________

THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

July 27

Case 3:15-cv-05107-RS Document 80 Filed 07/28/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:15-cv-05107-RS 3STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the

filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories, which shall 

serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.

s/ Jeffery M. Rosenfeld___________ 

Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld

Case 3:15-cv-05107-RS Document 80 Filed 07/28/16 Page 4 of 4