Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02471/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02471-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10894742v1 - 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME RE PRELIMINARY INVALIDITY 

AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

KIRKE M. HASSON (61446)

(kirke.hasson@pillsburylaw.com) 

SHARON L. O’GRADY (102356)

(sharon.ogrady@pillsburylaw.com) 

CRAIG J. BRISTOL (187231)

(craig.bristol@pillsburylaw.com) 

50 Fremont Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2228 

Telephone: (415) 983-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

BRIAN J. BEATUS (205719)

(brian.beatus@pillsburylaw.com) 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1114 

Telephone: (650) 233-4500 

Facsimile: (650) 233-4545 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaimant, PCTEL, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PCTEL, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

U.S. ROBOTICS CORP., 

 Defendant. 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 03-2471 MJJ 

E-filing

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

AMEND PRELIMINARY 

INVALIDITY AND PRELIMINARY 

INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 

No Trial Date Set 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff PCTEL, Inc. and 

Defendant U.S. Robotics Corporation, through their counsel of record, to extend the due 

date for Final Infringement Contentions from October 12, 2005 to October 26, 2005, and 

the due date for Final Invalidity Contentions to November 29, 2005. The ground for this 

stipulation is that the Court’s Claim Construction Order was entered two weeks before 

PCTEL’s opening Markman brief regarding U.S. Patent No. 5,787,305 was due. Thus the 

Case 3:03-cv-02471 Document 111 Filed 09/30/2005 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10894742v1 - 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME RE PRELIMINARY INVALIDITY 

AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 

30 day period for PCTEL to file its Final Infringement Contentions overlapped with the 

time that PCTEL’s counsel was occupied with preparing its Markman brief. 

IT IS HEREBY SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: September 29, 2005. 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP 

KIRKE M. HASSON 

BRIAN J. BEATUS 

CRAIG J. BRISTOL 

 SHARON L. O’GRADY 

By /s/

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

PCTEL, INC. 

Dated: September 29, 2005. 

MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLP 

WAYNE L. TANG, ESQ. 

wtang@mayerbrownrowe.com 

190 South LaSalle Street 

Chicago, IL 60603-3441 

By /s/

Attorneys for Defendant U.S. ROBOTICS 

CORPORATION 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for Defendant U.S. Robotics 

Corporation.

 By /s/ 

 Sharon L. O’Grady 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff, PCTEL, INC. 

Case 3:03-cv-02471 Document 111 Filed 09/30/2005 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10894742v1 - 3 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME RE PRELIMINARY INVALIDITY 

AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________ 

 The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-02471 Document 111 Filed 09/30/2005 Page 3 of 3

9/30/2005