Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01673/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01673-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME—C-05-01673 RMW

TSF

E-FILED on 10/18/07

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

TELE ATLAS N.V. and TELE ATLAS

NORTH AMERICA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NAVTEQ CORPORATION,

Defendant.

No. C-05-01673 RMW

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SHORTEN

TIME

[Re Docket No. 95]

Plaintiffs Tele Atlas N.V. and Tele Atlas North America ("Tele Atlas") move to shorten time

for a hearing on its motion for leave to submit additional expert disclosure. Defendant NAVTEQ

Corp. ("NAVTEQ") opposes the motion. The court deems the motion appropriate for submission on

the papers. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b).

Civil Local Rule 6-3(a)(3) requires a showing of "substantial harm or prejudice that would

occur if the Court did not change the time." Tele Atlas submits in its accompanying declaration that

it seeks resolution of the motion for leave to submit additional expert disclosure so that it "may

submit Dr. Neels' additional disclosure and offer Dr. Neels for further deposition well in advance of

the deadline for NAVTEQ to file and serve its reply briefs on summary judgment." Baily Decl. ¶ 3. 

However, Tele Atlas fails to explain what new expert opinion Dr. Neels will offer, how it might be

Case 5:05-cv-01673-RS Document 104 Filed 10/18/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME—C-05-01673 RMW

TSF

2

relevant to Tele Atlas' opposition to NAVTEQ's already-filed motion for summary judgment, or why

Dr. Neels' new testimony could not have been obtained during the scheduled discovery process. 

Tele Atlas does not show how it will suffer "substantial harm or prejudice" if its motion is not heard

on the standard schedule.

For the foregoing reasons, the court DENIES the motion to shorten time. Tele Atlas' motion for

leave to submit additional expert disclosure will be heard on November 30, 2007.

DATED: 10/18/07

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01673-RS Document 104 Filed 10/18/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME—C-05-01673 RMW

TSF

3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

David Eiseman davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com

William Morehead williammorehead@quinnemanuel.com

Melissa J Baily melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com

Counsel for Defendant:

Andrew Bridges abridges@winston.com

Dan Webb dwebb@winston.com 

George Lombardi glombardi@winston.com

David Koropp dkoropp@winston.com

Kevin Joon Oh koh@winston.com

David S. Bloch dbloch@winston.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered

for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 10/18/07 TSF

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:05-cv-01673-RS Document 104 Filed 10/18/07 Page 3 of 3