Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00796/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00796-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

FRANK PEREIRA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00796-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings March 18, 2016

Fact discovery cut-off September 30, 2016

Expert disclosures October 21, 2016

Expert rebuttal November 11, 2016

Expert discovery cut-off December 2, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions December 23, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due March 14, 2017

Pretrial conference March 24, 2017 at 

2:00 p.m.

Trial April 17, 2017 at 

8:30 a.m.

Case 3:15-cv-00796-JST Document 34 Filed 03/25/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Estimate of trial length (in days) Eight

The parties may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply 

with the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties are referred to the Court’s mediation program. Mediation must be completed 

by February 17, 2017. 

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 25, 2016

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00796-JST Document 34 Filed 03/25/16 Page 2 of 2