Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00280/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00280-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934

---

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

CV 05-5004 OWW SMS 

PAGE 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KingVision Pay-Per-View, Ltd., 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

Alfonso Rocco Manente, et al. 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. CV 05-0280 OWW SMS 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

AGAINST DEFENDANTS ALFONSO 

ROCCO MANENTE AND MARY 

CATHERINE MANENTE, individually 

and d/b/a MANENTE'S SPORTS BAR 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff KINGVISION PAYPER-VIEW, LTD. and Defendants ALFONSO ROCCO MANENTE and MARY 

CATHERINE MANENTE, individually and d/b/a MANENTE'S SPORTS BAR, that 

Plaintiff’s complaint filed in the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed without 

prejudice against ALFONSO ROCCO MANENTE and MARY CATHERINE 

MANENTE, individually and d/b/a MANENTE'S SPORTS BAR subject to the Court’s 

jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached between the Parties. 

/// 

/// 

Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. 

First Library Square 

1114 Fremont Avenue 

South Pasadena, CA 91030 

Tel: 626-799-9797 

Fax: 626-799-9795 

TPRLAW@att.net

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

KingVision Pay-Per-View, Ltd.

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00280-OWW -SMS Document 66 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

CV 05-5004 OWW SMS 

PAGE 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has 

filed a motion to reopen this action by December 1, 2006 this Court shall not have 

jurisdiction to set aside the above-referenced dismissal and the dismissal shall be deemed 

to be with prejudice. 

This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each 

Party referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Dated: October 13, 2006 /s/ Thomas P. Riley 

 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C.

 By: Thomas P. Riley 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD. 

Dated: /s/ David C. Mathias 

 THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID C. MATHIAS 

 By: David C. Mathias, Esquire 

 Attorneys for Defendants ALFONSO ROCCO 

 MANENTE AND MARY CATHERINE MANENTE, 

 individually and d/b/a MANENTE'S SPORTS BAR 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

/s/ Oliver W. Wanger____________ Dated: 10/20/06

The Honorable Oliver W. Wanger 

United States District Court 

Eastern District of Calif

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00280-OWW -SMS Document 66 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 2