Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00505/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00505-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Stay the Court’s Order for 

Plaintiff to Re-Notice Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs 

COSBY v. AUTOZONE, et al. 

Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. 

BOHM LAW GROUP

LAWRANCE A. BOHM, (SBN 208716)

BOHM LAW GROUP 

4600 Northgate Blvd. Ste 210 

Sacramento, CA 95834 

Telephone: (916) 927-5574 

Facsimile: (916) 927-2046 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

RANDY COSBY 

RICHARD R. GRAY, Bar No. 071030 

BARBARA A. BLACKBURN, Bar No. 253731 

LITTLER MENDELSON 

A Professional Corporation 

500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000 

Sacramento, CA95814 

Telephone: 916.830.7200 

Fax No.: 916.561.0828 

UNITED STATES DISRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RANDY COSBY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AUTOZONE INC., JIM KULBACKI and DOES 

1-100, inclusive, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:08-CV-00505-LKK-DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

STAY THE COURT’S ORDER FOR 

PLAINTIFF TO RE-NOTICE MOTION 

FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 

/// 

Case 2:08-cv-00505-KJM-DAD Document 209 Filed 11/27/12 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Stay the Court’s Order for 

Plaintiff to Re-Notice Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs 

COSBY v. AUTOZONE, et al. 

Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. 

BOHM LAW GROUP

Plaintiff, RANDY COSBY, and Defendant AUTOZONE, INC., hereby stipulate and request 

through their attorneys of record that this Court’s Order dated October 29, 2012 (ECF 201), 

ordering Plaintiff to re-notice his motion for attorney fees and costs, be stayed until thirty (30) 

days after Defendant’s pending appeal (case number 12-17559 in the United States Court of 

Appeal for the Ninth Circuit) is concluded. Similarly, any requested supporting documentation 

for Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs (ECF 203, November 13, 2012) is deemed unnecessary at this time. 

Plaintiff will move for costs pursuant to FRCP 54 and L.R. 291 upon the disposition of 

Defendant’s current appeal. 

Dated: November 21, 2012 By: _/s/ Lawrance A. Bohm LAWRANCE A. BOHM, ESQ. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

RANDY COSBY 

Dated: November 21, 2012 By: ___/s/ Richard R. Gray 

 RICHARD R. GRAY, ESQ. 

 LITTLER MENDELSON 

 A Professional Corporation 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 AUTOZONE 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 26, 2012. 

Case 2:08-cv-00505-KJM-DAD Document 209 Filed 11/27/12 Page 2 of 2