Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00530/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00530-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGER NEUFELD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JAMES A. YATES, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00530-REC-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 18)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND

FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

Plaintiff Roger Neufeld (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis and has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On February 17, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:05-cv-00530-REC -SMS Document 19 Filed 03/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 17,

2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for

plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s order of October 7, 2005,

and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 24, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00530-REC -SMS Document 19 Filed 03/27/06 Page 2 of 2