Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02414/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02414-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

SHELLIE LOTT, SBN: 246202 

Cerney Kreuze & Lott, LLP 

42 N. Sutter Street, Suite 400 

Stockton, California 95202 

Telephone: (209) 948-9384 

Facsimile: (209) 948-0706 

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO BRANCH 

VALERIE L. McKINNEY,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security 

Defendant. 

No. 2:14-cv-02414-EFB 

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER 

EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO 

REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S CROSSMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective 

undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff’s time to file a Reply to 

Defendant’s Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby 

extended 31 days from the present due date of October 23, 2015, to November 23, 2015. This 

extension is requested due to the writer’s heavy briefing schedule and moving to new office. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:14-cv-02414-EFB Document 26 Filed 11/02/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

DATED: October 22, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

 United States Attorney 

 DEBORAH LEE STACHEL 

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

 

 

 

/s/ Shellie Lott /s/ Amanda Schapel for Ellinor Coder 

SHELLIE LOTT, AMANDA SCHAPEL FOR ELLINOR CODER 

Attorney for Plaintiff (As authorized via E-mail on 10/19/15) 

 Special Assistant U S Attorney 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties showing good cause for a requested extension of 

Plaintiff’s time to file a Reply to Defendant’s Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, the request 

is hereby APPROVED. 

SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November 2, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-02414-EFB Document 26 Filed 11/02/15 Page 2 of 2