Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01792/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01792-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1 JAMES R. ROSEN (SBN: 119438) 

JROSEN(a),ROSENSABA.COM 

2 ELIZABEtH L. BRADLEY (SBN: 172272) 

EBRADLEY(a),ROSENSABA.COM 

3 ROSEN SABA LLP 

9350 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 250 

4 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 

Telephone: (310) 285-1727 

5 Facsimile: (31 0) 285-1728 

6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

MARLENE PEREZ AND ROSA CERISANO 

7 

8 MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN: 166805) 

MBRUNO(a),GORDONREES.COM 

9 HIED TRAN (SBN: 280585) 

HTRAN(a),GORDONREES.COM 

10 GORDON & REES LLP 

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 

11 San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: ( 415) 986-5900 

12 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 

13 Attorneys for Defendant 

JOHN MUIR HEALTH 

14 (erroneously sued herein as "John Muir Medical 

Center") 

15 

16 

17 

18 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

19 MARLENE PEREZ, an individual, and 

ROSA CERISANO, an individual, 

20 

21 

22 

vs. 

Plaintiff, 

JOHN MUIR HEALTH, a California 

23 coworation, JOHN MUIR MEDICAL 

CENTER.; an unknown business entity, 

24 and DOE;::, 1-20, et al 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Defendants. 

1 

CASE NO. 15-01792 HSG 

STIPULATION AND rPROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING 

CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE 

AND PRETRIAL DATES 

Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Complaint Filed: April21, 2015 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND 

PRETRIAL DATES CASE NO. 15-01792 HSG 

Case 4:15-cv-01792-HSG Document 44 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 4
1 STIPULATION 

2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 40-1 and 7-12, the Plaintiffs Marlene Perez 

3 and Rosa Cerisano and Defendant John Muir Health (hereafter collectively referred 

4 to as "the Parties"), through their attorneys of record, hereby jointly stipulate to 

5 request a continuance of the current trial date of July 11, 2016 to November 2, 

6 2016 or a date thereafter convenient to the Court based on the good cause set forth 

7 below. 

8 WHEREAS the trial date for this action is set for July 11, 20 16; 

9 WHEREAS lead trial counsel for Defendant, Michael Bruno, has just 

10 learned that he is expecting a baby in June 2016 and will be caring for the newborn 

11 in the following weeks, impacting his ability meet ongoing demands of trial 

12 preparation for this case; 

13 WHEREAS the Complaint was filed in this action on April21, 2015 in the 

14 above-entitled court; 

15 WHEREAS a case management conference was held on July 21, 2015; 

16 WHEREAS trial is presently set in this matter for July 11, 2016; 

17 WHEREAS the pretrial conference is presently set for June 28, 20 16; 

18 WHEREAS the discovery cut-off in the case is February 5, 2016; 

19 WHEREAS the Court, pursuant to the July 29,2015 Case Management 

20 Order, referred this matter to Early Neutral Evaluation; 

21 WHEREAS the Parties conducted a joint conference with the appointed 

22 Early Neutral Evaluation on December 15, 2015; 

23 WHEREAS the Parties have engaged in initial written discovery and have 

24 taken several key witness depositions, and have been diligently working on 

25 

26 

27 

28 

completing the same; 

WHEREAS the Parties are continuing to meet and confer regarding 

Plaintiffs' intent to seek leave of this Court to file a First Amended Complaint to 

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND 

PRETRIAL DATES CASE NO. 15-01792 HSG 

Case 4:15-cv-01792-HSG Document 44 Filed 12/21/15 Page 2 of 4
1 clean up the pleading based on recent discovery, but a stipulation has not yet been 

2 reached; 

3 WHEREAS associate trial counsel for Defendant, Hieu Tran, scheduled her 

4 wedding for September 3, 2016, based on the July 11, 2016 trial date, and her 

5 ability to meet the ongoing demands of trial preparation for this case will be 

6 adversely impacted if the trial date is continued from July 11, 2016 to a trial date in 

7 August or September 2016; 

8 WHEREAS, the Parties bring this issue to the Court's attention to avoid this 

9 scheduling conflict; 

10 WHEREAS the Defendants would be severely prejudiced if they have to 

11 proceed with trial on July 11, 2016, given the unavailability of counsel leading up 

12 to the trial date; 

13 WHEREAS there has been no prior continuance of the trial date in this 

14 matter; 

15 WHEREAS after having engaged in meet and confer discussions, the Parties 

16 have agreed to continue the trial date and have all dates, including discovery and 

17 motion deadlines, conform to any continued trial date set by this Court; and 

18 For the foregoing reasons, the Parties agree to the following extensions of 

19 time: 

20 

21 Event Current Date Proposed Date 

22 Fact Discovery Cutoff February 5, 2016 June 10, 2016 

Deadline to Exchange February 12, 2016 June 17, 2016 

23 Initial Expert Reports 

24 Deadline to File February 23, 2016 June 28, 2016 

Dispositive Motions 

25 Deadline to File March 15, 2016 July 19, 2016 

26 Oppositions to 

Dispositive Motions 

27 Deadline to File Replies March 25, 2016 July 29, 2016 

28 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND 

PRETRIAL DATES CASE NO. 15-01792 HSG 

Case 4:15-cv-01792-HSG Document 44 Filed 12/21/15 Page 3 of 4
1103270/26060917v.l 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

in Support of Dispositive 

Motions 

Deadline for Hearing 

Dispositive Motions 

Expert Discovery Cutoff 

Pretrial Conference 

Jury Trial 

Dated: December 16, 2015 

Dated: December 16, 2015 

April 7, 2016-2:00 p.m. 

April 22, 20 16 

June 28, 2016-3:00 p.m. 

July 11, 2016-8:30 a.m. 

10 days 

August 18, 2016 

August 26, 2016 

October 25, 2016 

November 7, 2016-8:30 

a.m. 10 days 

GORDON & REES LLP 

By: /S/ MICHAEL D. B"'nR.,.,O~N,.,..O~-

HIEUTRAN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JOHN MUIR HEALTH 

ROSEN SABA LLP 

By: /S/ JAMES R. Ros,.,.,E~N:-r---

ELIZABETH L. BRADLEY 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

MARLENE PEREZ AND ROSA 

CERISANO 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Having considered the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Continue Trial Date, 

Pretrial Conference, and Certain Pretrial Deadlines, as well as the Court's 

schedule, the Court hereby continues the Trial dates and all Pretrial dates as 

requested. 

25 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, ITIS SO ORDERED. 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: 

4 

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 

United States District Judge 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND 

PRETRIAL DATES CASE NO. 15-01792 HSG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. 

12/21/2015

Case 4:15-cv-01792-HSG Document 44 Filed 12/21/15 Page 4 of 4