Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00935/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00935-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803

F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN MONTUE, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-0935 LKK DAD P

vs.

TERESA A. SCHWARTZ, et al., 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas petition attacking a

1979 Sacramento County conviction. Examination of this action and the court’s records reveals

that petitioner previously filed a petition for relief concerning the same conviction and that the

previous petition was denied in 1995.1 (See Montue v. Rowland, case No. CIV S-91-0247 LKK

JFM P.)

The present action has been randomly assigned to the District Judge who

considered the previous petition. Pursuant to Local Rule 81-190(d), the above-captioned action

will be reassigned to the Magistrate Judge who considered the 1991 petition. The parties should

be aware that reassigning this action under Local Rule 81-190(d) merely has the result that the

Case 2:05-cv-00935-LKK -JFM Document 5 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

action is assigned to the same District Judge and the same Magistrate Judge who considered the

prior petition. No consolidation of the actions is effected.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is reassigned to Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds for all further

proceedings; henceforth, the caption on documents filed in this action shall be shown as No. CIV

S-05-0935 LKK JFM P;

2. The Clerk of the Court shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of

civil cases to compensate for this reassignment; and

3. The Clerk of the Court shall provide notice of this reassignment to the

Magistrate Judge now assigned to the case.

DATED: May 17, 2005.

DAD:13

mont0935.190

Case 2:05-cv-00935-LKK -JFM Document 5 Filed 05/18/05 Page 2 of 2