Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01407/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01407-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Anthony Wiley, Sr. asserts the defendants are liable for a violation of the Privacy Act of 1974, 

hate crime against a disabled American, judicial misconduct, judicial corruption, and RICO violation. 

(See generally Doc. 1) Because Plaintiff failed to comply with the Local Rules and failed to prosecute 

this action, the magistrate judge recommended the complaint be dismissed without prejudice on 

January 7, 2020.

Plaintiff was given fourteen days to file any objections to the recommendations that the action 

be dismissed. (Doc. 4) In addition, he was “advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.” (Id., citing Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 

1153 (9th Cir. 1991); Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 834 (9th Cir. 2014)). Notably, this 

document was also returned to the Court as undeliverable on January 16, 2020. In addition, no 

objections have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United 

ANOTHONY WILEY, SR.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT GOODMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:19-cv-1407 - LJO - JLT

ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(Doc. 4)

Case 1:19-cv-01407-LJO-JLT Document 5 Filed 01/29/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations are supported 

by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Findings and Recommendations dated January 7, 2020 (Doc. 4) are ADOPTED 

IN FULL;

2. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2020 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-01407-LJO-JLT Document 5 Filed 01/29/20 Page 2 of 2