Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03236/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03236-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE ISO PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS,

INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(e) – CASE NO. 5:14-CV-03236-RMW-HRL 

Winston & Strawn LLP 

101 California Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 

Krista M. Enns (SBN: 206430) 

kenns@winston.com 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

101 California Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 

Telephone: (415) 591-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 

Dan K. Webb (pro hac vice) 

dwebb@winston.com 

J. Erik Connolly (pro hac vice) 

econnolly@winston.com 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

35 West Wacker Drive 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Telephone: (312) 558-5600 

Facsimile: (312) 558-5700 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. and 

STMICROELECTRONICS, S.r.l., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 5:14-cv-03236-RMW-HRL

JOINT STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT 

EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION TO 

SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 

79-5(e) 

 

(),/('

Case 3:14-cv-03236-RS Document 112 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE ISO PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS,

INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(e) – CASE NO. 5:14-CV-03236-RMW-HRL 

Winston & Strawn LLP 

101 California Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 

Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) and Defendants STMicroelectronics, Inc. (“STMicroUS”) and STMicroelectronics, S.r.l. (“STMicro-Italy,” and collectively, “Defendants”), by and 

through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, on July 14, 2015, Cisco filed its opposition to STMicro-Italy’s motion to 

dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (the “Opposition,” ECF No. 106); 

WHEREAS, the Opposition includes various exhibits, including seven with respect to which 

Cisco believes STMicro-US and/or STMicro-Italy will take the position that they should be filed 

under seal, specifically: 

1. ECF No. 105-3 – Exhibit B to DECLARATION OF THIERRY SOLOMON IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO 

STMICROELECTRONICS, S.R.L.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF 

PERSONAL JURISDICTION. UNREDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT(S) 

SOUGHT TO BE SEALED. 

2. ECF No. 105-5 – Exhibit C to DECLARATION OF THIERRY SOLOMON IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO 

STMICROELECTRONICS, S.R.L.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF 

PERSONAL JURISDICTION. UNREDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT(S) 

SOUGHT TO BE SEALED. 

3. ECF No. 105-7 – Exhibit D to DECLARATION OF THIERRY SOLOMON IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO 

STMICROELECTRONICS, S.R.L.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF 

PERSONAL JURISDICTION. UNREDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT(S) 

SOUGHT TO BE SEALED. 

4. ECF No. 105-9 – Exhibit E to DECLARATION OF THIERRY SOLOMON IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO 

STMICROELECTRONICS, S.R.L.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF 

PERSONAL JURISDICTION. UNREDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT(S) 

SOUGHT TO BE SEALED. 

5. ECF No. 105-11 – Exhibit F to DECLARATION OF THIERRY SOLOMON IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO 

STMICROELECTRONICS, S.R.L.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF 

PERSONAL JURISDICTION. UNREDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT(S) 

SOUGHT TO BE SEALED. 

6. ECF No. 105-13 – Exhibit A to DECLARATION OF ARDAVAN POURHAMZEH IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO 

STMICROELECTRONICS, S.R.L.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF 

PERSONAL JURISDICTION. UNREDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT(S) 

SOUGHT TO BE SEALED. 

7. ECF No. 105-15 – Exhibit A to DECLARATION OF RICHARD MARSZALIK IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO 

STMICROELECTRONICS, S.R.L.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF 

Case 3:14-cv-03236-RS Document 112 Filed 07/24/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE ISO PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS,

INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(e) – CASE NO. 5:14-CV-03236-RMW-HRL 

Winston & Strawn LLP 

101 California Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 

PERSONAL JURISDICTION. UNREDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT(S) 

SOUGHT TO BE SEALED. 

WHEREAS, Cisco filed an administrative motion to seal each of these exhibits (ECF No. 

105); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e), Defendants have until July 20, 2015 (because 

the fourth day from Cisco’s July 14, 2015 filing falls on a weekend day) to file a declaration to 

support the sealing; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend Defendants’ time to file a declaration as 

required by Local Rule 79-5(e) to July 30, 2015; 

NOW THEREFORE, Cisco and Defendants stipulate as follows, subject to the Court’s 

approval: 

 Defendants shall have until July 30, 2015, to file and serve a declaration in support of 

sealing pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: July 17, 2015 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

By: /s/Krista M. Enns 

Krista M. Enns 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

Dated: July 17, 2015 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

By: /s/ Nicole Ryan Nicole Ryan 

Attorneys for Defendant 

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. 

Dated: July 17, 2015 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

By: /s/ Nicole Ryan 

 Nicole Ryan 

Attorneys for Defendant 

STMICROELECTRONICS, S.r.l. 

Case 3:14-cv-03236-RS Document 112 Filed 07/24/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE ISO PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS,

INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5(e) – CASE NO. 5:14-CV-03236-RMW-HRL 

Winston & Strawn LLP 

101 California Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July __, 2015 

 Ronald M. Whyte 

 United States District Judge 

LOCAL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION 

I, Krista M. Enns, am the ECF User whose ID and password was used to file this JOINT 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION TO SEAL PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 79-5(e). In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that, counsel for 

Defendants, concurred in this filing. 

Dated: July 17, 2015 By: /s/Krista M. Enns 

 Krista M. Enns 

Case 3:14-cv-03236-RS Document 112 Filed 07/24/15 Page 4 of 4