Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-00836/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-00836-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD RINGGOLD,

Plaintiff,

v.

BURGETT INC., et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:22-cv-00836-DAD-CKD PS

ORDER DENYING ELECTRONIC FILING

(ECF No. 28)

Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to participate in electronic case filing.1

(ECF No. 28.) Generally, “any person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing except 

with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.” See E.D. Cal. L.R. 133(b)(2). 

Plaintiff’s request for electronic case filing does not provide good cause for deviance from the 

Local Rule applicable to unrepresented litigants. At the current stage of this case, the motion is 

DENIED. 

Dated: December 15, 2022

8.ring22cv836.efile

1 This action is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 

302(c)(21).

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-00836-DAD-CKD Document 31 Filed 12/15/22 Page 1 of 1