Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01954/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01954-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEJANDRO RANGEL GONZALES, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1954 LKK GGH P

vs.

DAVID L. RUNNELS, Warden, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, has filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order

No. 262.

On January 7, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

Respondent has filed objections to the findings and recommendations to which petitioner has

filed a reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

Case 2:05-cv-01954-LKK -GGH Document 53 Filed 03/05/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 7, 2008, are adopted in full;

and

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, filed on June 5, 2006, is denied, and

respondent is directed to file an answer within thirty days.

DATED: March 4, 2008.

Case 2:05-cv-01954-LKK -GGH Document 53 Filed 03/05/08 Page 2 of 2