Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02944/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02944-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES CORBEL and ROXANNE

HAATVEDT, individually and on behalf of

a class of similarly-situated individuals,

Plaintiff,

 v.

21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY OF

CALIFORNIA, A MEDICAL

CORPORATION; 21ST CENTURY

ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.; and

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendant. /

No. C 16-02944 WHA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART

MOTION FOR EXTENSION

The Court is in receipt of defendants’ motion for an extension to respond to plaintiffs’

complaint until thirty days after a ruling on the motion to transfer. Defendants’ deadline for

responding to plaintiffs’ complaint is on August 2, 2016. This motion should have been made

sooner. Regardless of whether the case is transferred, defendants will eventually need to

respond to plaintiffs’ complaint. There will be no waste in beginning that work. Given that the

deadline is in less than a week, however, this order grants an additional two weeks for

defendants to respond to plaintiffs’ complaint. It is unwarranted to postpone work that will

Case 3:16-cv-02944-WHA Document 27 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

eventually need to be done. Defendants shall therefore respond to plaintiffs’ complaint by

August 15, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-02944-WHA Document 27 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 2