Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01145/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01145-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:1938 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CBM-SAC\SA076445

ORDER REGARDING STATUS CONFERENCE

Gary M. Messing, No. 075363

James W. Henderson, Jr., No. 071170

CARROLL, BURDICK & McDONOUGH LLP

Attorneys at Law

1007 7th Street, Suite 200

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: 916.446.5297

Facsimile: 916.446.4487

Email: gmessing@cbmlaw.com

jhenderson@cbmlaw.com

Harry S. Stern, No. 176854

Peter Hoffmann, No. 254354

RAINS LUCIA STERN, PC

2300 Contra Costa Blvd., Suite 230

Pleasant Hill, CA 94523

Telephone: (925) 609-1699

Facsimile: (925) 609-1690

Email: phoffmann@rlslawyers.com

William B. Aitchison, No. 90642

AITCHISON & VICK, INC.

3021 NE Broadway

Portland, OR 97232

Telephone: (503) 282-6160

Facsimile: (503) 282-5877

Email: will@aitchisonvick.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JUAN ESPINOZA, PAUL 

MARQUEZ, AARON EPPERLY and ERIC SCHMIDT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN ESPINOZA, PAUL MARQUEZ, 

AARON EPPERLY and ERIC 

SCHMIDT,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF FRESNO,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:07-CV-01145-OWW-SMS

ORDER REGARDING STATUS

CONFERENCE

DATE: APRIL 22, 2010

TIME: 12:00 P.M.

The State Conference ordered by this Court pursuant to its Order of April 8, 

2010 took place on April 22, 2010 at 12:00 p.m. in Courtroom 3 of the above-entitled 

Case 1:07-cv-01145-BAM Document 128 Filed 04/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CBM-SAC\SA076445 -2-

ORDER REGARDING STATUS CONFERENCE

Court. James W. Henderson, Jr. and Gary M. Messing of the firm of Carroll, Burdick & 

McDonough LLP appeared on behalf of the Plaintiffs; Michael G. Woods, Esq. of the 

firm of McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth appeared on behalf of the 

Defendant County of Fresno. 

Counsel for the parties and the Court discussed the status of the appeal in 

Bamonte v. City of Mesa, Arizona (9th Cir. Doc. 08-16206). In view of the fact that there 

is pending a Petition for Rehearing en banc with the Ninth Circuit in that action, it was 

agreed by the parties and the Court that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

and/or Partial Adjudication should not be heard until after a final decision is issued in 

Bamonte v. City of Mesa, Arizona. 

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

1. The hearing on the County of Fresno’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

and/or Partial Adjudication, which had been set by the April 8, 2010 Order for July 19, 

2010, is hereby vacated and a new hearing date shall be set after notification to the Court 

that the Bamonte appeal has concluded. Counsel for the Plaintiffs has agreed to provide 

that notice to the Court.

2. Upon notification of the resolution of the Bamonte appeal, the Court will 

schedule a new Status Conference which, among other things, will set a new hearing date 

for the Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Partial Adjudication, a supplemental 

briefing schedule for that matter, a Final Pre-Trial Conference date, a Trial date and such 

other associated and related deadlines as may be appropriate.

3. That portion of the April 8, 2010 Order lifting the stay shall remain in 

effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

emm0d64h

Case 1:07-cv-01145-BAM Document 128 Filed 04/28/10 Page 2 of 2