Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02972/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02972-45/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LL P

One Ferry Building, Suite 200, san francisco, ca 94111-4213

(415) 391-4800 • fax (415) 989-1663

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE MCGRAW

TESTIMONY – CASE NO. C05-2972 MMC

1255169.1

HOWARD A. SLAVITT (State Bar # 172840)

JULIA D. GREER (State Bar # 200479)

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP

One Ferry Building, Suite 200

San Francisco, California 94111-4213

Telephone: (415) 391-4800

Facsimile: (415) 989-1663

E-mail: has@cpdb.com

Jdg@cpdb.com

MICHAEL A. ALBERT (admitted pro hac vice)

MICHAEL N. RADER (admitted pro hac vice)

LAURA TOPPER (admitted pro hac vice)

WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.

600 Atlantic Avenue

Boston, MA 02210-2206

Telephone: (617) 646-8000

Facsimile: (617) 646-8646

E-mail: malbert@wolfgreenfield.com

Attorneys for Defendants

DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC AND DIOMED, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES,

INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC., DIOMED,

INC., ANGIODYNAMICS, INC, and

VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, INC.

Defendants.

Case No. C05-02972 MMC (JL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION PURSUANT TO

CIVIL L.R. 6-3 TO SHORTEN TIME FOR

THE COURT TO HEAR PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE

EXPERT TRIAL TESTIMONY OF J.

KEVIN MCGRAW ON OPINIONS NOT

CONTAINED IN HIS EXPERT REPORT

(D.I. # 342-344)

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 3:05-cv-02972-MMC Document 381 Filed 09/25/07 Page 1 of 2
COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LL P

One Ferry Building, Suite 200, san francisco, ca 94111-4213

(415) 391-4800 • fax (415) 989-1663

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE MCGRAW

TESTIMONY -- CASE NO. C05-2972 MMC

Plaintiff VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc. (“VNUS”) has moved pursuant to Civil Local

Rule 6-3 for an order shortening the time for the Court to hear Plaintiff s Motion In Limine To

Exclude Expert Trial Testimony of J. Kevin McGraw on Opinions Not Contained in His Expert

Report (D.I. # 342-344) (VNUS s Motion in Limine ) filed on September 13, 2007. Good cause

having not been shown, VNUS’s motion is denied. Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Preparation

Order of February 15, 2006, oppositions to motions in limine are due no later than five Court days

prior to the pretrial conference. Diomed’s opposition is therefore due no later than October 9,

2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Dated: September 25, 2007

The subject Motion in Limine will be heard at the scheduled Pretrial Conference.

Case 3:05-cv-02972-MMC Document 381 Filed 09/25/07 Page 2 of 2