Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05218/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05218-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION / CASE NO. 13-

CV-05218 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ALEXANDER KRAKOW + GLICK LLP

Michael S. Morrison (SBN 205320) mmorrison@akgllp.com

Brett C. Beeler (SBN 287749) bbeeler@akgllp.com

401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1000

Santa Monica, California 90401

Telephone: (310) 394-0888

Facsimile: (310) 394-0811

LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT J. BLOCH, PA

Scott J. Bloch (SBN 264559) scott@scottblochlaw.com

1050 17th St. NW, Suite 600

Washington, DC 20036

Telephone: (202) 496-1290

Facsimile: (202) 478-0479

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

AARON ROSE and TROY SWEDEEN

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Heather Havette (SBN 222658) hhavette@seyfarth.com

1075 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2500

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3962

Telephone: (404) 885-1500

Facsimile: (404) 892-7056

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Michele H. Gehrke (SBN 215647) mgehrke@seyfarth.com

Matthew J. Mason (SBN 271344) mmason@seyfarth.com

560 Mission Street, 31st Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 397-2823

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549

Attorneys for Defendant

AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.

Michael S. Kun (SBN 208684) mkun@ebglaw.com

Ted A. Gehring (SBN 218715) tgehring@ebglaw.com

1925 Century Park East, Suite 500

Los Angeles, California 90067

Telephone: (310) 556-8861

Facsimile: (310) 553-2165

Attorneys for Defendant

AEROTEK, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO

AARON ROSE, as an individual, TROY 

SWEDEEN, as an individual, and on behalf of all 

Case No. 13-CV-05218 CRB

Case 3:13-cv-05218-CRB Document 117 Filed 02/17/15 Page 1 of 5
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION / CASE NO. 13-

CV-05218 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., a 

Corporation, AEROTEK, INC., a Corporation, and 

DOES 1 through 100,

Defendants.

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF 

ENTIRE ACTION

AEROTEK, INC., a Corporation

Cross-Complainant,

vs.

AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.; and 

ROES I through 100,

Cross-Defendant.

AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Cross-Complainant,

vs.

AEROTEK, INC., a Corporation; and MOES 1 

through 100,

Cross-Defendant.

Pursuant to the Confidential Settlement Agreements and Releases by and between Plaintiffs 

AARON ROSE and TROY SWEDEEN (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant AECOM GOVERNMENT 

SERVICES, INC. (“AECOM”), and the global settlement between AECOM, Plaintiffs, and Defendant 

Aerotek, Inc. (“Aerotek”) at the settlement conference, and Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that the above-captioned action, including 

without limitation all complaints, amended complaints, and counter-complaints, including all claims and 

cross-claims, be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the parties hereto, by and through their 

respective counsel of record, as follows:

Case 3:13-cv-05218-CRB Document 117 Filed 02/17/15 Page 2 of 5
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION / CASE NO. 13-

CV-05218 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On November 10, 2014, the Parties attended a Settlement Conference before the Honorable 

Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Following the Settlement Conference, the Parties agreed to a 

Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release whereby Plaintiffs agreed to voluntarily dismiss their 

First Amended Complaint and all claims contained therein with prejudice. The Settlement Agreement 

has been fully executed and the Parties now request dismissal of this action with prejudice. 

Although this action was filed as a putative class action, Plaintiffs’ investigation and discovery 

reveled that there were only 15 individuals who could potentially fit within the class definition contained 

in the First Amended Complaint. Of these individuals, the majority signed releases while others 

accepted different positions with Defendant AECOM, thereby differentiating their circumstances from 

the Named Plaintiffs and precluding their ability to join in any potential class represented by Troy 

Swedeen or Aaron Rose. Thus, Plaintiffs’ counsel does not believe the numerosity requirement for class 

certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure could be met in this case and settled 

the individual claims of the Plaintiffs on that basis.

Defendants AECOM and Aerotek further stipulate and agree that any and all Cross-Complaints 

filed in this action, including all cross-claims included therein, shall also be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: February 13, 2015 ALEXANDER KRAKOW + GLICK LLP

By: /s/ Michael S. Morrison

Michael S. Morrison

Brett C. Beeler

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

AARON ROSE and TROY SWEDEEN

DATED: February 13, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT J. BLOCH, PA

By: /s/ Scott J. Bloch

Scott J. Bloch 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

AARON ROSE and TROY SWEDEEN

Case 3:13-cv-05218-CRB Document 117 Filed 02/17/15 Page 3 of 5
4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION / CASE NO. 13-

CV-05218 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: February 13, 2015 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: /s/ Heather Havette

Heather Havette

Michele H. Gehrke

Matthew J. Mason

Attorneys for Defendant

AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

DATED: February 13, 2015 EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.

By: /s/ Michael S. Kun

Michael S. Kun 

Ted A. Gehring 

Attorneys for Defendant

AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Case 3:13-cv-05218-CRB Document 117 Filed 02/17/15 Page 4 of 5
5

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION / CASE NO. 13-

CV-05218 CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Whereas Plaintiffs filed a class action complaint asserting claims on behalf of themselves and all 

similarly situated persons;

Whereas Plaintiffs have determined that it is not feasible to pursue the class claims, and have 

entered into an individual settlement; and

Whereas, notice to the general public is not required because no class has been certified, the 

putative class members’ claims, if any, are not affected, and the cost of notice would be prohibitively 

expensive and would make the individual settlement economically infeasible;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that case number 13-CV-05218, and all causes and actions 

contained therein, including cross-complaints and cross-claims, shall be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE

as to all parties, including as to Plaintiffs’ individual claims, but without prejudice as to the putative 

class members’ claims, with each party to bear its own costs and fees incurred in this action. The Court 

shall retain jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement. 

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: February 17, 2015 ________________________

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

18977047v.2 / 074449 18977047v.2 / 074449 -000018-000018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:13-cv-05218-CRB Document 117 Filed 02/17/15 Page 5 of 5