Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00417/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00417-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF/2580223v1 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION 

DEADLINE

SEDGWICK LLP

REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802 

rebecca.hull@sedgwicklaw.com

MARK J. HANCOCK Bar No. 160662 

mark.hancock@sedgwicklaw.com

333 Bush Street, 30th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 781-7900 

Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CATHY A. REYNOLDS 2008 REVOCABLE 

TRUST; R.W. “SKIP” REYNOLDS, 

TRUSTEE OF CATHY A. REYNOLDS 2008 

REVOCABLE TRUST; RHYS HOSKINS, 

Beneficiary of Cathy A. Reynolds 2008 

Revocable Trust and heir of Cathy A. Reynolds, 

Decedent; MELORIA HOSKINS, Beneficiary 

of Cathy A. Reynolds 2008 Revocable Trust 

and heir of Cathy A. Reynolds, Decedent; 

ESTATE OF CATHY A. REYNOLDS; R. W. 

“SKIP” REYNOLDS as Executor of the Estate 

of Cathy A. Reynolds; and R. W. “SKIP” 

REYNOLDS as Conservator of the Estate of 

Cathy A. Reynolds, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:12-cv-00417 JAM-DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION 

DEADLINE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and 

Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company by and through their respective attorneys of 

record, as follows: 

Case 2:12-cv-00417-JAM-DAD Document 11 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF/2580223v1 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION 

DEADLINE

Mediation had been scheduled to take place on October 4, 2012 before JAMS Mediator 

Judge Ellen Sickle James (Ret.), and the parties were to have filed an updated joint status report 

on or before October 12, 2012. (See Docket No. 9). Due to scheduling issues that arose after that 

mediation date was selected, the parties agreed that it was necessary to postpone the mediation to 

November 27, 2012, the earliest date that Judge James, the parties and counsel all had available 

for mediation. Accordingly, the parties seek an order that: (1) they be given until November 27, 

2012 to complete mediation; (2) they be excused from filing an updated joint status report by 

October 12, 2012; and (3) they be given until December 7, 2012 to submit an updated joint status 

report concerning the outcome of the mediation. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: October 11, 2012 HELLER & HIBBERT 

 By: /s/ Steven M. Heller (as authorized 10/11/12)

 Steven M. Heller 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DATED: October 11, 2012 SEDGWICK LLP 

By: /s/ Mark J. Hancock

Rebecca A. Hull 

Mark J. Hancock 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 2:12-cv-00417-JAM-DAD Document 11 Filed 10/12/12 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF/2580223v1 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION 

DEADLINE

ORDER

Good cause appearing and pursuant to the above Joint Stipulation to Continue Mediation 

Completion Deadline, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

1. The parties shall have until November 27, 2012 to complete mediation; 

2. The parties are excused from filing an updated joint status report by October 12, 2012; 

3. The parties shall have until December 7, 2012 to submit an updated joint status report 

concerning the outcome of the mediation. 

Date: 10/11/2012 

 /s/ John A. Mendez____________

 JOHN A. MENDEZ 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:12-cv-00417-JAM-DAD Document 11 Filed 10/12/12 Page 3 of 3