Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00773/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00773-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICHARD ANDERSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EL DORADO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-0773 AC P 

ORDER1

 

 By order filed April 10, 2015, plaintiff was directed to file, within thirty days, an amended 

complaint and a new in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees. See ECF No. 

5. Plaintiff was informed that failure to file an amended complaint or a new application to 

proceed in forma pauperis (or to pay the filing fees) would result in the dismissal of this action. 

Id. at 4. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 

 The docket indicates that plaintiff was served with a copy of the court’s order at his 

address of record, the El Dorado County Jail in Placerville. A subsequent order of the court, filed 

April 14, 2015, was returned because plaintiff is no longer at incarcerated at the El Dorado 

//// 

 

1

 Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned Magistrate Judge for all purposes 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and Local Rule 305(a). See ECF No. 3. 

Case 2:15-cv-00773-AC Document 7 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

County Jail.2 See ECF No. 6. However, pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at 

the record address of the party is fully effective. It is plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court 

appraised of his current address at all times. 

 In light of plaintiff’s failure to respond to the court’s April 10, 2015 order, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

DATED: May 26, 2015 

 

2

 The court’s review of the Inmate Locator websites operated by El Dorado County and the 

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation indicate that plaintiff is currently 

incarcerated at neither location. See http://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/search.aspx, and 

http://edcapps.edcgov.us/sheriff/jail/jail_datalist.asp?psearch. This Court may take judicial notice 

of facts that are capable of accurate determination by sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably 

be questioned. Fed. R. Evid. 201; see also City of Sausalito v. O'Neill, 386 F.3d 1186, 1224 n.2 

(9th Cir. 2004) (“We may take judicial notice of a record of a state agency not subject to 

reasonable dispute.”). 

Case 2:15-cv-00773-AC Document 7 Filed 05/27/15 Page 2 of 2