Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01714/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01714-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Percy Lee Rhodes is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of 

the United States Magistrate Judge on November 23, 2015. Local Rule 302.

On December 8, 2016, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and directed 

Plaintiff to file a third amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on the claims 

found to be cognizable within thirty days. (ECF No. 29.) Over thirty days have passed and Plaintiff 

has failed to respond to the Court’s order. Accordingly, within twenty (20) days from the date of 

service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to 

prosecute. The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of the action for failure to 

prosecute. Local Rule 110. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 18, 2017 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PERCY LEE RHODES,

 Plaintiff,

v.

FRESNO COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01714-SAB (PC)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE 

TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

[ECF No. 29]

Case 1:15-cv-01714-DAD-SAB Document 31 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 1