Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06719/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06719-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TARAH JOY JONHSON; KELLY )

JENNINGS; ALEXA N. KOURAFAS; )

MEREDITH L. FARMER; ALI L. )

LOWREY; MARISSA HARVEY; )

DANIELLE HOFFMAN; )

NATALIE GREGORIO; and ROBIN )

 MATTHEWS, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. )

)

CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL )

DISTRICT; JOSEPH NIETO; )

and DOES 1-5, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1: 04 -CV- 6719 AWI DLB

ORDER VACATING ORDER

OF AUGUST 21, 2007 AND

VACATING AUGUST 27, 2007,

HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS 

(Re: Document No. 55)

On August 21, 2007, the Court issued an order vacating the hearing date of August 27,

2007. That order is found Court’s Docket Doc. No. 55. Document No. 55 mistakenly indicates

that the hearing is on Plaintiffs’s motion to dismiss. In actuality, the motion to dismiss was filed

by Defendant Clovis Unified School District. To avoid confusion, the Court will vacate the

order of August 21, 2007. 

Defendant Clovis Unified School District noticed for hearing and decision a motion to

dismiss. The matter was scheduled for hearing to be held on August 27, 2007. Pursuant to Local

Rule 78-230(c), the court has reviewed the moving papers and has determined that this matter is

suitable for decision without oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h). 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court’s order of August 21, 2007, is VACATED; and

2. The previously set hearing date of August 27, 2007, on Defendant’s motion to dismiss is

VACATED, and the parties shall not appear at that time. As of August 27, 2007, the

Case 1:04-cv-06719-AWI-DLB Document 56 Filed 08/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court will take Defendant’s motion to dismiss under submission and will thereafter issue

its decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 21, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

ciem0h UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06719-AWI-DLB Document 56 Filed 08/22/07 Page 2 of 2