Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03667/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03667-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

DUSTAN L HOLCK, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S

OFFICE et al.,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-05-3667-PHX-MHM (BPV)

 

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco who has issued a Report

and Recommendation that recommends that the complaint and action should be dismissed

without prejudice. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff has not filed written objections to the Report and

Recommendation. 

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The district court must review the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations

de novo if objection is made but not otherwise. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)("[a] judge of the court shall

make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings

or recommendations to which objection is made").

DISCUSSION

The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the complaint and action should be

dismissed without prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. As discussed

Case 2:05-cv-03667-MHM Document 8 Filed 08/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

in the Report and Recommendation, a docket entry dated May 10, 2006 shows that mail sent

to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable. (Doc. 5). Following the filing of the Report and

Recommendation, a docket entry dated July 12, 2006 shows that mail sent to Plaintiff was

returned as undeliverable. (Doc. 7). Plaintiff has failed to keep the Court advised of his

current address and has failed to prosecute this case. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc.

6) as the Order of the Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint (Doc. 1) and action are dismissed

without prejudice.

DATED this 4th day of August, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03667-MHM Document 8 Filed 08/09/06 Page 2 of 2