Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01471/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01471-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Oluwagbolade Omidire,

Petitioner,

vs.

Alberto Gonzales, et al.,

Respondents, 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-1471-PHX-SMM (ECV) 

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. #3). The matter was referred to the magistrate judge for a Report

and Recommendation (Doc. #2). On May 1, 2008, the magistrate judge filed a Report and

Recommendation with this Court (Doc. #29). To date, no objections have been filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see Baxter v. Sullivan,

923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). Parties have ten days from the service of a copy of the

Magistrate’s recommendation within which to file specific written objections to the Court.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. Failure to object to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of the magistrate judge’s

factual findings and waives all objections to those findings on appeal. See Turner v. Duncan,

158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). A failure to object to a magistrate judge’s conclusion “is

Case 2:07-cv-01471-SMM Document 30 Filed 06/05/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal.”

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998).

DISCUSSION

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge, and no

Objections having been made by any party thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and adopts

the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above,

 IT IS ORDERED that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge (Doc. #29).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Stay of Deportation (Doc. #25)

is denied. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Deferral of Removal (Doc. #26)

is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

(Doc. #3) is denied and dismissed, terminating this case. The Clerk of the Court shall enter

judgment accordingly.

DATED this 5th day of June, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-01471-SMM Document 30 Filed 06/05/08 Page 2 of 2