Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05382/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05382-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO FILE AM. COMPLAINT 3:14-CV-05382-NC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STEPHANIE O. SPARKS – BAR NO. 218438

sos@hogefenton.com

SHELLA DEEN – BAR NO. 149735

sd@hogefenton.com

JUSTINE M. CANNON – BAR NO. 254176

jmc@hogefenton.com

HOGE, FENTON, JONES & APPEL, INC.

Sixty South Market Street, Suite 1400

San Jose, California 95113-2396

Phone: (408) 287-9501

Fax: (408) 287-2583

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DPIX LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DPIX LLC, a Delaware limited liability 

company,

Plaintiff,

vs.

YIELDBOOST TECH, INC., a California 

corporation, and KYO YOUNG CHUNG, 

an individual,

Defendants.

No. 3:14-CV-05382-JST

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT

(Civil L.R. 6-2)

The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulated Request to File Amended Complaint filed 

herein on June 1, 2015, and good cause appearing therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff DPIX LLC is granted leave to file its Amended 

Complaint out of time, and Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint filed on May 14, 2015 (Dkt. 39) shall be 

deemed filed as of the date of this Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of 

this Order to file an Amended Answer and Counterclaims to the Amended Complaint. 

Case 3:14-cv-05382-JST Document 45 Filed 06/02/15 Page 1 of 2
-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO FILE AM. COMPLAINT 3:14-CV-05382-NC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended 

complaint either this Wednesday, June 3, 2015, or the day following the Court’s order granting 

leave to file an amended complaint, following the parties’ efforts to meet and confer on Defendants’ 

objections, and if Plaintiff so files, then Defendants shall have a further fourteen (14) days thereafter 

in which to file their answer and counterclaims thereto.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation shall be without prejudice to, and 

without a waiver of, Defendants’ right to challenge the adequacy of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 2, 2015

HON. JON S. TIGAR

JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-05382-JST Document 45 Filed 06/02/15 Page 2 of 2