Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00138/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00138-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

CASE NO. 2:08-CV-00138-LEW-JFM 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

08cv138.o.320.doc

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, State Bar No. 166952 

scottnjohnson@comcast.net

5150 Fair Oaks Blvd., Suite 101 

PMB #253 

Carmichael, CA 95608-5758 

Telephone: (916) 485-3516 

Facsimile: (916) 481-4224 

Attorney for Plaintiff SCOTT N. JOHNSON 

THOMAS M. MCINERNEY, State Bar No. 162055 

tmm@ogletreedeakins.com

GREGORY C. CHENG, State Bar No. 226865 

gregory.cheng@ogletreedeakins.com

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 

1 Market Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 442-4871 

Facsimile: (415) 442-4870 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FEDEX KINKO'S OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FEDEX KINKO'S, INC., Individually and 

d/b/a/ FEDEX KINKO'S #4433; FEDEX 

KINKO'S OFFICE AND PRINT 

SERVICES, INC., Individually and d/b/a 

FEDEX KINKO'S #4433; SPIEKER 

PROPERTIES #183, LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, a California limited 

partnership; EQUITY OFFICE 

PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT CORP., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:08-CV-00138-LEW-JFM 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 

41(a) 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:08-cv-00138-JAM -JFM Document 12 Filed 03/20/08 Page 1 of 4
1 CASE NO. 2:08-CV-00138-LEW-JFM 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

08cv138.o.320.doc

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson, 

appearing in pro per, and Defendant FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc. 

(erroneously sued as “FedEx Kinko’s, Inc.” and “FedEx Kinko’s #4433”), by its attorneys 

of record Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., by Gregory C. Cheng, attorney 

at law, that the following Stipulation may be entered as an Order by the Court to give effect 

to the stipulations set forth below: 

WHEREAS, Defendant FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc. filed its 

Answer to the Complaint on or about February 29, 2008; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a settlement in this case and are in the process 

of executing the settlement agreement; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, Plaintiff agreed to 

dismiss Defendant FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc., with prejudice; 

WHEREAS, on or about March 14, 2008, Plaintiff unilaterally filed a Request for 

Dismissal of Defendant FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc. and Leave of Court 

to Amend Complaint (“Request”). In that Request, Plaintiff inadvertently requested that 

Defendant be dismissed “without prejudice” rather than “with prejudice” as agreed upon 

between the Parties; 

WHEREAS, the Request also was technically deficient because pursuant to Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a), Defendant FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, 

Inc. did not execute or stipulate to the Request; 

WHEREAS, on March 17, 2008, the Court signed the order dismissing Defendant 

FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc. without prejudice; 

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that Plaintiff’s Request of March 14, 2008 should be 

void as to Plaintiff’s request that Defendant FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc. 

be dismissed without prejudice. However, Plaintiff’s request for leave to file an amended 

complaint and this Court’s order granting such request shall not be affected by this order; 

and 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:08-cv-00138-JAM -JFM Document 12 Filed 03/20/08 Page 2 of 4
2 CASE NO. 2:08-CV-00138-LEW-JFM 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A) 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

08cv138.o.320.doc

WHEREAS, through this Stipulation, the Parties stipulate that that Defendant 

FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc. of the above-referenced action be and hereby 

is dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED ON THE DATES INDICATED BELOW. 

DATED: March 19, 2008 SCOTT N. JOHNSON 

By: /s/ Scott Johnson 

Scott N. Johnson 

Appearing In Pro Per

DATED: March 19, 2008 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & 

STEWART, P.C. 

By: /s/ Gregory Cheng 

Gregory C. Cheng 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FEDEX KINKO'S OFFICE AND PRINT 

SERVICES, INC. 

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

Defendant FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc. (erroneously sued as “FedEx 

Kinko’s, Inc.” and “FedEx Kinko’s #4433”) be dismissed, with prejudice, from the abovereferenced action, pursuant to FRCP Rule 41(a)(1). 

DATED: March 20, 2008 

By: /s/ Ronald S. W. Lew____________

Honorable Ronald S.W. Lew, Senior, 

United States District Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:08-cv-00138-JAM -JFM Document 12 Filed 03/20/08 Page 3 of 4
1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MAIL 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California; I am over the age 

of 18 years and not a party to this action. My business address is 633 West Fifth Street, 

53rd Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071. 

On March 19, 2008, I served the following document(s) described as: 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a) 

on the persons below as follows: 

Scott N. Johnson, Esq. 

5150 Fair Oaks Blvd., Suite 101 

PMB #253 

Carmichael, CA 95608-5758 

IN PRO PER 

I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at 

the addresses as indicated above and: 

ý placed the envelope or package for collection and mailing, following our ordinary 

business practices. I am readily familiar with this business’s practice for collecting 

and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is 

placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business 

with the United State Postal Service, in a sealed envelope or package with postage 

fully prepaid. 

I am employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The envelope or package 

was placed in the mail at Los Angeles, California. 

ý (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this 

Court at whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty 

of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the above 

is true and correct. 

Executed on March 19, 2008, at Los Angeles, California. 

Leticia Rivera /s/ Leticia Rivera

Type Name Signature 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:08-cv-00138-JAM -JFM Document 12 Filed 03/20/08 Page 4 of 4