Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00637/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00637-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARILEE BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

SALLY JEWELL,

Defendant.

No. 2:16-cv-0637 MCE CKD PS

ORDER

Presently calendared for hearing on January 25, 2017 is defendant’s motion to dismiss. 

Plaintiff has requested an additional extension of time to April, 2017 to file an opposition due to 

personal health reasons and because of care she provides to her parents. Plaintiff’s request is 

unreasonable. The motion was filed September 12, 2016 and the court has already afforded 

plaintiff over three months to oppose the motion. However, a brief additional extension will be 

granted.

Plaintiff has also requested that she not be required to copy documents she uses in support 

of her motion if those documents have previously been provided to defendant. The court does not 

have copy of documents purportedly provided to defendant. Any documents plaintiff intends to 

use in support of her opposition must be submitted to the court and served on defense counsel. 

The court does note, however, that the pending motion is a motion to dismiss; generally 

documents outside of the pleadings are not considered on a motion to dismiss except as to those 

Case 2:16-cv-00637-MCE-CKD Document 26 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

matters which are subject to judicial notice. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of January 25, 2017 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s motion is 

continued to February 22, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 24.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition to the motion to dismiss no later than January 18, 2017. 

Any documents referenced in the opposition must be submitted as exhibits in support of the 

opposition, served on defense counsel, and must be properly authenticated and subject to judicial 

notice. Failure to file opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result 

in submission of the motion on the papers and a recommendation that this action be dismissed 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

3. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than February 1, 2017. 

Dated: December 1, 2016

4 brown0637.2.con

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-00637-MCE-CKD Document 26 Filed 12/02/16 Page 2 of 2