Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01374/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01374-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 46:688 Jones Act

---

1

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. 3:15-CV-01374-JCS

TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rex M. Clack, Esq. (SBN 59237)

rclack@sc-law.us

David E. Russo, Esq. (SBN 112023)

drusso@sc-law.us

STERLING, CLACK & RUSSO

A Professional Corporation

601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2018

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 543-5300

Facsimile: (415) 543-3335

Attorneys for Defendant

GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY &

TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD CAHILL

Plaintiff,

vs.

GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY &

TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, et al.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 3:15-CV-01374-JCS

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

Case 3:15-cv-01374-JCS Document 13 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 2
2

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. 3:15-CV-01374-JCS

TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff RICHARD CAHILL (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, 

HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT (“Defendant”), by and through their respective 

counsel of record, hereby stipulate that pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), defendant may have an 

extension of time, to and including June 11, 2015, to file an Answer to the Complaint.

Dated: 5/21/15 STERLING, CLACK & RUSSO

 By: /s/ David E. Russo________

David E. Russo

Attorneys for Defendant

GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY &

TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT

Dated: 5/21/15 LAW OFFICES OF LYLE C. CAVIN, JR.

 By: /s/ Lia T. Marks___________

Lia T. Marks

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RICHARD CAHILL

The filer of this document hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from each of the other signatories. 

21510615/P/Stip for Ext of Time to Answer Complaint

Dated: 5/22/15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:15-cv-01374-JCS Document 13 Filed 05/22/15 Page 2 of 2