Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06045/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06045-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 120
Nature of Suit: Marine Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

6

SECOND AND FINAL STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO

RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT' Case No. C 12 - 06045 MEJ

1 JAMES A MARISSEN, CASE No. 257699

james.marissen@kyLcom

2 KRISTY A. HEWITT, CASE No. 274452

kristy.hewitt@kyLcom

3 KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN

A Professional Corporation

4 400 Oceangate, P.O. Eox 1730

Long Beach, California 90801·1730

5 Telephone: (562) 436-2000 .

Facsimile: (562) 436-7416

Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant

7 HYUNDAI MERCHANT MARINE (AMERICA) INC.

8

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11

TUNG TAl GROUP, a California

12 corporation,

) Case No. C 12-06045 MEJ

)

)

) SECOND AND FINAL STIPULATION TO

) EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO

) RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

)

)

) [L.R. 6-1(a)]

)

) Complaint removed: Nov. 29, 2012

) Current deadline: Dec. 27, 2012

) New deadline: Jan. 17, 2013

l------------------------------~)

Plaintiff, 13

14 vs.

15 HYUNDAI MERCHANT MARINE

(AMERICA) INC. and DOES 1-20,

16 inclusive,

Defendant. 17

18

19

20

21

22

WHEREAS, on October 24,2012, Plaintiff TUNG TAl GROUP ("TT Group")

filed a Summons and Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California for the

County of San Francisco, thereby commencing an action, entitled TUNG TAl GROUP, a

California corporation v. HYUNDAI MERCHANT MARINE (AMERICA) INC. and

23

DOES 1-20, inclusive, Case No. CGC-12-525400 ("the State Court Action");

24

25

26

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the Summons and Complaint in the State

Court Action on Defendant, HYUNDAI MERCHANT MARINE (AMERICA) INC.

("Hyundai"), on October 30, 2012;

WHEREAS, on November 29, 2012, Hyundai removed the State Court

27

28

Action to this Court;

- 1 - KYL LE1566950

Case 3:12-cv-06045-MEJ Document 10 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 2
13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[L.R. 6- HA)J - Case No. C 12 - 06045 MEJ

1 WHEREAS, Hyundai's response to the Complaint was originally due on or

2 before December 6, 2012;

3 WHEREAS, the Parties stipulated to extend Hyundai's response to the

4 Complaint to on or before December 27,2012;

5 WHEREAS, the Parties would like additional time to complete their

6 investigations into the allegations made in the Complaint;

7 WHEREAS, the Parties hereby agree to a final, twenty-one (21) day

8 extension of the deadline by which Hyundai is required to respond to the Complaint;

9 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff TUNG TAl GROUP, through its counsel,

10 and Defendant, HYUNDAI MERCHANT MARINE (AMERICA) INC, through its

11 counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant shall respond to Plaintiffs

12 Complaint on or before January 17, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

/ !///(/

t . /.1 / /!~1.! __ --

i.· 'I -- l/f//,I ~~

! ! V,I v

-;

DATED: December? I, 2012

WILLIAM SIAMAS

MORGAN, FRANICH, FREDKIN &

MARSH

Attorneys for Plaintiff

TUNG TAl GROUP.

DATED: December _, 2012

JAMES A. MARISSEN

KRISTY A HEWITT

KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN

Attorneys for Specially Appearing

Defendant

HYUNDAI MERCHANT MARINE

(AMERICA) INC.

OT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Maria-Elena James

Dated: 1/2/2013

Case 3:12-cv-06045-MEJ Document 10 Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 2