Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01308/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01308-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

1The court notes that on March 23, 2006, Petitioner’s copy of the findings and

recommendations were returned as undeliverable by the United States Postal Service with the

notation “not in custody.” However, service on a petitioner at his address of record is fully

effective. Local Rule 83-182 (e). 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SINGH SARBJIT, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

 )

JOHN ASHCROFT, )

Respondent. )

)

)

CV F 05-1308 AWI WMW HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATION RE

DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a habeas

corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2241. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

On March 13, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations that

recommended this action be dismissed for Petitioner’s failure to prosecute. These Findings and

Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. No

objections were filed.1 

Case 1:05-cv-01308-AWI-WMW Document 12 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

(9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 13, 2006,

are a adopted in full;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed for Petitioner’s failure to prosecute;

and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and to close this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01308-AWI-WMW Document 12 Filed 04/13/06 Page 2 of 2