Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05098/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05098-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TK POWER, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEXTRON, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

No. C-04-5098 EMC

VERDICT FORM

Case 3:04-cv-05098-EMC Document 224 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 5
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

I. BREACH OF CONTRACT

On TK Power’s claim for breach of contract, select one of the two options:

_____ We find in favor of TK Power and against Textron/E-Z-GO.

_____ We find in favor of Textron/E-Z-GO and against TK Power.

If you find in favor of TK Power on this claim, answer the following:

We award TK Power the following damages: $ __________.

Please go on to the next section, Section II - Negligent Misrepresentation.

Case 3:04-cv-05098-EMC Document 224 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 5
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

II. NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION

On TK Power’s claim for negligent misrepresentation, select one of the two options:

_____ We find in favor of TK Power and against Textron/E-Z-GO.

_____ We find in favor of Textron/E-Z-GO and against TK Power.

If you find in favor of TK Power on this claim, answer the following:

We award TK Power the following damages: $ __________.

Please go on to the next section, Section III - False Promise.

Case 3:04-cv-05098-EMC Document 224 Filed 05/19/06 Page 3 of 5
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

III. FALSE PROMISE

On TK Power’s claim for false promise, select one of the two options:

_____ We find in favor of TK Power and against Textron/E-Z-GO.

_____ We find in favor of Textron/E-Z-GO and against TK Power.

If you find in favor of TK Power on this claim, answer the following:

We award TK Power the following damages: $ __________.

If you find in favor of TK Power on the claim for false promise, also answer the following

two questions:

1. Did Textron/E-Z-GO engage in the conduct with malice, oppression or fraud?

_____ Yes _____ No

2. Was the conduct constituting malice, oppression, or fraud committed by one or more

officers, directors, or managing agents of Textron/E-Z-GO acting in a corporate capacity?

_____ Yes _____ No

Case 3:04-cv-05098-EMC Document 224 Filed 05/19/06 Page 4 of 5
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

Signed:

____________________________________________________________________

Presiding Juror

Dated: __________

After all sections have been completed, deliver this verdict form to Judge Chen.

Case 3:04-cv-05098-EMC Document 224 Filed 05/19/06 Page 5 of 5