Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00521/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00521-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESS PEREZ, III,

Plaintiff,

v.

L. SCMIDT, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-0521 CKD P

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On June 6, 2016, defendants filed a motion to compel. On July 27, 2016, 

plaintiff was ordered to file a response to the motion within 21 days. In the same order, plaintiff 

was informed that failure to file a response would result in dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(b). The twenty-one day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s 

order. 

Accordingly IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court 

judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:15-cv-00521-MCE-CKD Document 41 Filed 08/29/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: August 29, 2016

1

pere0521.46fr

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00521-MCE-CKD Document 41 Filed 08/29/16 Page 2 of 2