Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05694/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05694-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT WEBBANK; PROPOSED ORDER - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT J. SAGARIA (SBN 217981) 

ELLIOT W. GALE (SBN 263326) 

JOE ANGELO (SBN 268542) 

SAGARIA LAW, P.C. 

2033 Gateway Place, 6th Floor 

San Jose, CA 95110 

408-279-2288 ph: 408-279-2299 fax 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

HOWARD RYDOLPH,

Plaintiff,

v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC.; et. al.,

 

 Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-CV-05694-WHA

STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT

WEBBANK; PROPOSED ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Howard Rydolph and defendant 

WebBank, that WebBank be dismissed from this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure, section 41(a)(2), and that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and 

costs. 

//

//

Case 3:16-cv-05694-WHA Document 54 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 2
 STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT WEBBANK; PROPOSED ORDER - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: January 18, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C.

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Howard Rydolph 

DATED: January 18, 2017 Doll Amir and Eley LLP

By: /s/ Chelsea Diaz

 Chelsea Diaz

Attorneys for Defendant

WebBank

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Chelsea Diaz has concurred in this filing. 

/s/ Elliot Gale

 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Defendant WebBank is dismissed with 

prejudice as to plaintiff's claims only (i.e., without prejudice to any potential cross-claims that

might possibly be asserted later by co-defendants against WebBank). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 William H. Alsup 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

January 19, 2017.

Case 3:16-cv-05694-WHA Document 54 Filed 01/19/17 Page 2 of 2