Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02313/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02313-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROLLAND C. HANLEY, JR., No. CIV S-03-2313 MCE GGH P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

SCHMIDT, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On May 19, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days.

///

Case 2:03-cv-02313-MCE -GGH Document 46 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Within his objections, plaintiff does not provide any substantive reason for having failed 1

to file a timely opposition. The court will not allow objections to take the place of an opposition

that could and should have been filed in conformity with the court’s motion procedure. 

2

On June 20, 2005, plaintiff was granted a thirty day extension of

time in which to file and serve his objections. Plaintiff has

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 19, 2005, are

adopted in full; 

2. Defendants’ March 10, 2005, motion to dismiss is

granted; and

3. This action is dismissed.

DATED: September 28, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-02313-MCE -GGH Document 46 Filed 09/28/05 Page 2 of 2