Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01790/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01790-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1790

DEBORAH J. PRUNTY; THE DEBORAH J. PRUNTY LIVING TRUST,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

ROY M. TERRY, JR.,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:09-cv-00220-HEH)

Submitted: June 22, 2010 Decided: July 16, 2010

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ann M. Callaway, ANN M. CALLAWAY PC, Warrenton, Virginia, for 

Appellants. John Craig Smith, DURRETTEBRADSHAW, PLC, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-1790 Doc: 21 Filed: 07/16/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Deborah J. Prunty and the Deborah J. Prunty Living 

Trust appeal from the district court’s order upholding the 

bankruptcy court’s determination that Prunty received an 

interest in the debtor’s property that was avoidable as a 

preferential transfer pursuant to 11 U.S.C.A. § 547(b) (West 

2004 & Supp. 2010). Our review of the record and the briefs 

filed by the parties discloses no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Prunty v. Terry, No. 3:09-cv-00220-HEH (E.D. Va. June 1, 

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-1790 Doc: 21 Filed: 07/16/2010 Pg: 2 of 2