Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00924/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00924-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CESAR ENCISO,

Plaintiff,

v.

DR. MOON, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:12-cv-00924-LJO-SKO (PC)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Doc. 45)

Plaintiff Cesar Enciso, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 7, 2012. This action is proceeding against 

Defendants Moon, Alcantar,

1

Silva, Doe 1, and Doe 3 for violation of the Eighth Amendment of 

the United States Constitution and for negligence under California law. Plaintiff’s claims arise of 

the denial of adequate medical treatment at North Kern State Prison in Delano, California.

On May 12, 2014, Defendants Moon and Alcantar filed a motion for summary judgment 

for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies.2 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); 

Albino v. Baca, __ F.3d __, __, No. 10-55702, 2014 WL 1317141 (9th Cir. Apr. 3, 2014) (en 

 

1

Identified in the complaint as Alcator.

2 The motion was accompanied by the requisite contemporaneous notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for 

summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 938-41 (9th Cir. 2012).

Case 1:12-cv-00924-LJO-SKO Document 46 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

banc) (failure to exhaust should be raised in a summary judgment motion). Accordingly, it is 

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file an 

opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion; and

2. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition, this 

action will be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to 

prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 13, 2014 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00924-LJO-SKO Document 46 Filed 05/13/14 Page 2 of 2