Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-04654/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-04654-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-4654 

 AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUATION OF HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Ronald Y. Rothstein (pro hac vice) 

RRothste@winston.com 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

35 West Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60601-9703 

Telephone: (312) 558-5600 

Facsimile: (312) 558-5700 

Megan L. Whipp (SBN: 319182) 

MWhipp@winston.com 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

333 South Grand Avenue, 38th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543 

Telephone: (213) 615-1700 

Facsimile: (213) 615-1750 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SHELLY ROBINSON, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

THE J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY, an Ohio 

corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive 

Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 4:18-cv-04654-HSG 

CLASS ACTION 

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND 

ORDER FOR CONTINUATION OF 

FEBRUARY 21, 2019 HEARING ON 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Courtroom: 2 

Complaint filed: August 2, 2018 

First Amended Complaint filed: October 24, 

2018 

Case 4:18-cv-04654-HSG Document 42 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-4654 

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUATION OF HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff Shelly Robinson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant The J.M. Smucker Company 

(“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate for a continuation of the February 21, 2019 

hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint to the Court’s next 

available hearing date. 

WHEREAS, on November 7, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First 

Amended Complaint (the “Motion”). See ECF No. 26. 

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion is scheduled for February 21, 2019 at 

2:00 P.M. 

WHEREAS, Defendant’s lead counsel Ronald Y. Rothstein has an unexpected personal 

conflict with the February 21, 2019 hearing on the Motion. See Declaration of Ronald Rothstein ¶ 2. 

WHEREAS, the Parties now jointly stipulate to continue the hearing until the Court’s next 

available hearing date. 

WHEREAS, the Parties are available for a hearing on February 28, 2019. 

WHEREAS, nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of any rights or defenses by the 

Parties. 

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED by the Parties, through their undersigned 

counsel, that the February 21, 2019 hearing on Defendant’s Motion will be continued to the Court’s 

next available hearing date. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February 15, 2019 PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS, P.C. 

By: /s/ Scott J. Ferrell Scott J. Ferrell, Bar No. 202091 

sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com 

PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS, P.C. 

4100 Newport Place Drive, Ste. 800 

Newport Beach, CA 92660 

Telephone: (949) 706-6464 

Facsimile: (949) 706-6469 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SHELLY ROBINSON 

Case 4:18-cv-04654-HSG Document 42 Filed 02/19/19 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

CASE NO. 4:18-CV-4654 

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUATION OF HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Dated: February 15, 2019 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

By: /s/ Ronald Y. Rothstein Ronald Y. Rothstein (pro hac vice) 

RRothste@winston.com 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

35 West Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60601-9703 

Telephone: (312) 558-5600 

Facsimile: (312) 558-5700 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY 

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that 

the concurrence in filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 

Dated: February 15, 2019 

/s/ Ronald Y. Rothstein 

Ronald Y. Rothstein (Pro Hac Vice)

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

The hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is 

scheduled for February 28, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. 

Date: February 19, 2019 __________________________ 

 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

 Judge of the Northern District 

Court of California 

 

Case 4:18-cv-04654-HSG Document 42 Filed 02/19/19 Page 3 of 3