Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01675/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01675-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY SWENSON, No. CIV S-08-1675-FCD-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

SISKIYOU COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. A hearing on

defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 4) was held on October 1, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. before the

undersigned in Redding, California. At the hearing, the court discussed with the parties

defendants’ argument, as raised at Point 19 in their motion to dismiss, that plaintiff’s claims are

not cognizable because plaintiff had access to adequate state court remedies. The parties will be

permitted an opportunity to file supplemental briefing on this point. Plaintiff’s supplemental

opposition will be due by October 31, 2008, and defendants’ supplemental reply will be due by

November 26, 2008. The parties should not address any arguments other than those raised at

Point 19 in defendants’ motion. Following submission of supplemental briefs, defendants’

motion will stand submitted on the papers without further hearing. 

Case 2:08-cv-01675-KJM-CMK Document 21 Filed 10/06/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff may file a supplemental opposition addressing Point 19 of

defendants’ motion to dismiss by October 31, 2008; and

2. Defendants may file a supplemental reply by November 26, 2008. 

DATED: October 3, 2008

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:08-cv-01675-KJM-CMK Document 21 Filed 10/06/08 Page 2 of 2