Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02120/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02120-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRESTON L. PHILLIPS,

Petitioner, No. 2:08-cv-2120 FCD KJN P

vs.

WARDEN ROBERT HOREL,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is proceeding without counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. As noted in this court’s December 10, 2010 order, petitioner has

been released on parole. By the order filed December 10, 2010, petitioner was ordered to show

cause, within twenty-one days, why his action should not be dismissed based on his failure to file

a notice of change of address. Petitioner was also cautioned that failure to comply with the order

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-one day period has

now expired, and petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

Case 2:08-cv-02120-FCD-KJN Document 13 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 6, 2011

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

phil2120.fsc

Case 2:08-cv-02120-FCD-KJN Document 13 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 2