Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00508/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00508-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT N. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0508 WBS EFB PS

vs.

LINDA DIANE ST. MARY, et al,

Defendants. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 /

By order dated December 20, 2006, this court denied plaintiff’s motion to amend the

complaint due to discrepancies between the original motion to amend and the “proposed”

amended complaint, and for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Local Rules for filing a

proposed amended complaint. Plaintiff indicated that his seeking leave to amend was

occasioned by his realization that he had not named the proper parties. Accordingly, the order

denying the motion further ordered plaintiff to file within twenty days either a new motion to

amend that complied with the Local Rules, or alternatively, a proposed amended complaint that

conformed to his original motion filed October 12, 2006. More than twenty days have passed,

and plaintiff has failed to comply with the court’s order. 

Accordingly, the court hereby orders plaintiff to show cause in writing within ten (10)

days of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and

Case 2:06-cv-00508-WBS-EFB Document 51 Filed 02/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

for failure to obey court orders. Failure to timely respond to this order will result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed.

DATED: February 7, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00508-WBS-EFB Document 51 Filed 02/07/07 Page 2 of 2