Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01508/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01508-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 490
Nature of Suit: Cable/ Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 47:553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS INC.

 

Plaintiff,

v.

RUBEN GARCIA ARANDA d/b/a/ EL

CACHANILLA POOL HOUSE,

Defendant.

 /

1:12-cv-1508-AWI-BAM 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

On March 26, 2013, Plaintiff J&J Sports Production Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for

Default Judgment. (Doc. 11). On May 7, 2013, Defendant Ruben Garcia (“Defendant”) filed a

Motion to Set Aside the Clerk’s Entry of Default. (Doc. 15).

On July 17, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe issued Findings

and Recommendations (“F&R”) which were served on the parties and contained notice that any

objections to the F&R were to be filed within fifteen days of service of the Order. (Doc. 19). To

date, no party has filed an opposition. 

In accordance with the provisions of Title 28 of the United States Code section 636(b)(1)(c),

this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds that the F&R is supported by the record and proper analysis.

1

Case 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM Document 20 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 17, 2013, are adopted in full;1

2. Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default is GRANTED; 

3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED as moot;

4. Defendant shall file a written answer with the Court on or by September 26, 2013;

and

5. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 3, 2013 

0m8i78 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

The F&R recommended a deadline for filing an answer, and also set a status conference with the

1

Magistrate Judge. However, the deadlines for those events have now passed. The Court will set a new deadline for

Defendant to file an answer, and will refer the matter back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

2

Case 1:12-cv-01508-AWI-BAM Document 20 Filed 09/04/13 Page 2 of 2