Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_89-cv-00577/USCOURTS-cand-3_89-cv-00577-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 152
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Recovery of Debt to US

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL COSENTINO SBN 83253

Counsel for the United States

PO Box 129

ALAMEDA, CA 94501

Telephone: (510) 523-4702

Facsimile: (510) 747-1640

COUNSEL FOR THE UNITED STATES 

OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case NO. 3:89-cv-00577 LB

 Plaintiff, JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE

 v. MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

DERRICK CRUMPLER,

 

 Defendant.

 / CMC HEARING

Date: June 23, 2016 CANCELLED

Time: 11:00 A. M.

Place: Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler

Courtroom C, 15th Floor

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

THIS IS A SUPPLEMENT TO THE SEPARATE (PLAINTIFF’S) 

CMC STATEMENTS FILED JANUARY 20, 2016, AT DOCKET # 15, 

AND FILED JANUARY 28, 2016, AT DOCKET 17

JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CMC STATEMENT

In compliance with the court’s AMENDED ORDER ESTABLISHING CMC

PROCEDURES, as a result of a meet and confer telephone conversation on May 23,

2016, between the parties, on May 24, 2016, plaintiff’s counsel mailed defendant a

form, which when filled out, could give the parties a basis for settlement. On June 7,

2016, plaintiff’s counsel telephoned defendant; defendant stated that he would be

unable to mail the completed form to counsel until June 13, 2016. Plaintiff’s counsel

received the completed form June 14, 2016. 

JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CMC STATEMENT 6-15-16 US v CRUMPLER 3:89 cv 00577 LB

ORDER

Case 3:89-cv-00577-LB Document 27 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On June 15, 2016, the parties spoke by telephone regarding settlement. 

Significant inroads were made toward settlement during this discussion. It is

realistically possible that the parties could settle the matter in its entirety over the next

few weeks. This being said, the parties agreed that they would request that the court

extend the time by 3 or 4 weeks for the parties to submit either settlement documents,

or an updated Joint CMC Statement, to the court. Because the defendant is unable to

execute this Statement timely, the parties agreed that plaintiff’s counsel would submit

it with the understanding that defendant is in agreement with the request for more

time. 

June 15, 2016 ______/s/_______________________

 Michael Cosentino, Counsel for plaintiff

June 15, 2016 /s/ by telephone________________

Derrick Crumpler, Defendant pro se

JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CMC STATEMENT 6-15-16 US v CRUMPLER 3:89 cv 00577 LB 2

Case Management Conference reset to September 29, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. A Joint 

Case Management Statement due September 22, 2016. 

Date: June 16, 2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Laurel Beeler

Case 3:89-cv-00577-LB Document 27 Filed 06/16/16 Page 2 of 2