Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03418/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03418-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Plaintiff and Counterclaim

Defendant,

 v.

ROSS J. MILLER, an individual, and ROSS

J. MILLER, DDS, A PROFESSIONAL

CORPORATION,

Defendants and

Counterclaimants /

No. C-05-3418 MMC

ORDER ALLOWING APPLICANT FOR

ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE TO

SUPPLEMENT APPLICATION

Before the Court is applicant Sandeep N. Solanki’s (“Solanki”) application to appear

pro hac vice on behalf of the above-named defendants. 

In his application, Solanki lists his business address as 275 Battery Street, San

Francisco. The Civil Local Rules of this district provide that an applicant who resides in

California is ineligible to practice pro hac vice, unless he has resided in California for less

than one year, has completed all required applications for admission to the State Bar of

California, and has officially registered to take or is awaiting the results of the California

State Bar examination. See Civil L.R. 7-11(b). In his application, Solanki does not indicate

whether he falls within said exception.

//

Case 3:05-cv-03418-MMC Document 78 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, Solanki will be afforded leave to file, no later than June 30, 2006, a

supplement to his application, to indicate whether he qualifies for the exception set forth

above. If Solanki fails to demonstrate he so qualifies, the application will be denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03418-MMC Document 78 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2