Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03891/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03891-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

STIPULATION SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING DISCOVERY MOTION; ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERT T. SULLWOLD (SBN 88139)

JAMES A. HUGHES (SBN 88380)

SULLWOLD & HUGHES

235 Montgomery Street, Suite 730

San Francisco, CA 94104

(415) 263-1850

(415) 989-9798 FAX

Attorneys for 

Plaintiff LeadClick Media, Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEADCLICK MEDIA, INC.

Plaintiff

v.

RELATIONSERVE MEDIA, INC., SENDTEC, 

INC., and DOES I through X, 

Defendants.

Case No.: C 06 3891 SC

STIPULATION SHORTENING TIME FOR 

HEARING DISCOVERY MOTION; ORDER

SENDTEC, INC.,

 Counterclaimant,

 v.

LEADCLICK MEDIA, INC,,

 Counterdefendant

STIPULATION

The parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows:

1. On or about May 25, 2007, plaintiff LeadClick Media, Inc. (“LeadClick”) timely 

served its Second Set of Interrogatories (the “Interrogatories”) on defendant SendTec, Inc., fka 

RelationServe Media, Inc. (“SendTec”).

2. On or about June 20, SendTec timely served its written response to the 

Interrogatories.

Case 3:06-cv-03891-SC Document 33 Filed 07/06/07 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING DISCOVERY MOTION; ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. LeadClick deemed SendTec’s response inadequate, and, on June 29, counsel for 

LeadClick FAXed a letter to counsel for SendTec specifying the inadequacies and requesting a further

response. On July 6, counsel for SendTec advised counsel for LeadClick that he has been engaged in a 

trial in another matter and had not had the opportunity to consult with his client about this issue. He also 

stated that, due to scheduling conflicts, he would not be able to address this matter until the end of next 

week.

4. Pursuant to Local Rule 26-2, the deadline for LeadClick to file a motion to 

compel further discovery responses is Monday, July 9.

5. Counsel for LeadClick was advised by the Court’s clerk to notice any motion to 

compel further discovery responses for the Court’s August 3 calendar.

6. The parties desire to have additional time to be able to meet and confer regarding 

the adequacy of SendTec’s responses to the Interrogatories in an effort to resolve this issue without 

judicial intervention. They also agree that, if their discussions are unsuccessful, the issue should be 

presented to the Court for hearing and decision on August 3.

7. To accomplish this objective, the parties agree to shorten time for a motion to 

compel further discovery responses if one proves necessary. Specifically, the parties agree that the time 

for LeadClick to file a motion to compel further discovery responses is extended to July 16; if LeadClick 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:06-cv-03891-SC Document 33 Filed 07/06/07 Page 2 of 3
3

STIPULATION SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING DISCOVERY MOTION; ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

files such a motion, the hearing shall be noticed for August 3; SendTec shall file its opposition by July 

23, and LeadClick shall file its reply, if any, by July 30.

DATED: July 6, 2007 ROBERT T. SULLWOLD

JAMES A. HUGHES

SULLWOLD & HUGHES

s/ Robert T. Sullwold

Robert T. Sullwold

Attorneys for

Plaintiff LeadClick Media, Inc.

DATED: July 6, 2007 KENNETH J. RUBINSTEIN

HAYNES & BOONE, LLP

s/ Kenneth J, Rubinstein

Kenneth J. Rubinstein

Attorneys for

Defendant SendTec, Inc.

ORDER

Having considered the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS 

ORDERED:

1. The time for LeadClick to file any motion to compel further discovery responses 

is extended to July 16. 

2. If LeadClick files such a motion, it shall notice it for hearing on the Court’s 

August 3 calendar. Send Tec shall file its opposition by July 23 and LeadClick shall file its reply, if any,

by July 30.

DATED: July 6, 2007

United States District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:06-cv-03891-SC Document 33 Filed 07/06/07 Page 3 of 3