Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-02449/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-02449-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO DECIDE MOTION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

 Kathleen M. Sullivan (CA Bar No. 242261) 

 kathleensullivan@quinnnemanuel.com 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 

Redwood City, California 94065 

Telephone: (650) 801-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 

 Faith E. Gay (pro hac vice) 

 faithgay@quinnemanuel.com 

 Isaac Nesser (pro hac vice) 

 isaacnesser@quinnemanuel.com 

51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor 

New York, New York 10010 

Telephone: (212) 849-7000 

Facsimile: (212) 849-7100 

Attorneys for the Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

Doe I, Doe II, Ivy He, Doe III, Doe IV, Doe V, 

Doe VI, Roe VII, Charles Lee, Roe VIII, Doe 

IX, Liu Guifu, Wang Weiyu, and those 

individuals similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

Cisco Systems, Inc., John Chambers, Fredy 

Cheung, and Does 1-100, 

Defendants. 

 Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

REQUEST TO DECIDE MOTION 

WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT 

Action Filed: May 19, 2011 

Judge: Hon. Edward J. Davila 

Hearing Date: March 5, 2014 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 4, 5th Floor 

XXXXXXXXX

Case 5:11-cv-02449-EJD Document 162 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO DECIDE MOTION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT 

Plaintiffs have requested under L.R. 7-1(b) that the Court decide Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Reconsideration (Dkt. 155) without oral argument. Defendants have joined Plaintiffs’ request. The 

Court agrees that the Motion may be decided without oral argument, and hereby orders that the 

oral argument set for March 5, 2015 at 9:00 A.M. be removed from the calendar. The Court will 

take the matter under submission without oral argument. 

Date: January ___, 2015 

 The Hon. Edward J. Davila 

14

Case 5:11-cv-02449-EJD Document 162 Filed 01/14/15 Page 2 of 2