Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-07026/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-07026-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ZANE M. HUBBARD,

Plaintiff,

v.

TIMOTHY M. LOCKWOOD, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-07026-JST 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, an inmate at California State Prison – Soledad, filed this pro se civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. He requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF 

No. 2. On November 7, 2019, the Court issued an order to show cause why the plaintiff should 

not be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), the threestrikes provision set forth in the Prison Litigation Reform Act. ECF No. 3. On November 18, 

2019, plaintiff filed an answer to the order to show cause. ECF No. 5. On November 25, 2019, 

after considering plaintiff’s answer, the Court denied plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis pursuant to Section 1915(g). ECF No. 6. The Court’s denial of in forma pauperis

status was based on its finding that plaintiff had previously filed at least three actions that 

qualified as “strikes” under Section 1915(g) and that plaintiff had not alleged that he is under 

imminent danger of serious physical injury. ECF No. 6. The Court ordered plaintiff to pay the 

$400 filing and administrative fee in full by December 23, 2019, or face dismissal of this action 

without prejudice to plaintiff re-filing upon payment of the full filing fee. 

//

//

//

Case 4:19-cv-07026-JST Document 7 Filed 12/31/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The deadline to pay the filing fee in full has passed, and plaintiff has neither paid the filing 

fee or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without 

prejudice re-filing upon payment of the full filing fee.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 31, 2019

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 4:19-cv-07026-JST Document 7 Filed 12/31/19 Page 2 of 2