Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01585/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01585-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1585

CHARLES CLAIR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN DOE, CLERK OF THE STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF ST. MARY'S 

COUNTY, MD; JOHN DOE, Clerk of Circuit Court of St. Mary's 

County, MD,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

THOMAS V. MIKE MILLER, JR., Attorney; PETER O'NEIL,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:14-

cv-00713-PWG)

Submitted: November 4, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Clair, Appellant Pro Se. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General, 

Jennifer L. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, 

for Appellees.

Appeal: 16-1585 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1585 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Charles Clair appeals the district court’s orders granting 

the motion to dismiss his amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See Clair v. Doe, No. 8:14-

cv-00713-PWG (D. Md. Apr. 29, 2016; Feb. 1, 2016). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1585 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 3 of 3