Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00019/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00019-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Darrell Ray Bailey, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

D. Schriro, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-0019-PHX-ROS

ORDER

On August 4, 2008, Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle issued a Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus be dismissed. (Doc. 16.) Petitioner failed to file timely objections. 

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is “clear that the

district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if

objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1126 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not otherwise.’”). District

courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject

Case 2:06-cv-00019-ROS Document 17 Filed 09/05/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). No objection having been

made, the Court will adopt the R&R in full.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is ADOPTED and the

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court shall close

this case.

DATED this 5th day of September, 2008.

Case 2:06-cv-00019-ROS Document 17 Filed 09/05/08 Page 2 of 2