Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01822/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01822-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT F. RIVERA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1822 FCD DAD P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, 

et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 14, 2007, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed May 1, 2007, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend and

ordering plaintiff to submit either an application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis or

the filing fee of $350.00. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders

shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the

court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or

contrary to law.

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-01822-FCD-DAD Document 13 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed May 1, 2007, is affirmed. 

DATED: May 22, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-01822-FCD-DAD Document 13 Filed 05/22/07 Page 2 of 2