Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01116/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01116-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM E. McDANIELS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1116 MCE GGH P

vs.

U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed March 26, 2007, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within thirty

days, why respondent’s January 30, 2007, motion to dismiss should not be granted. The thirty

day period has now expired, and petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the

court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that respondent’s January 30, 2007, motion to

dismiss is granted.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:05-cv-01116-MCE -GGH Document 24 Filed 06/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 6/22/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

mcda1116.fsc

Case 2:05-cv-01116-MCE -GGH Document 24 Filed 06/22/07 Page 2 of 2