Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_03-cv-02355/USCOURTS-casd-3_03-cv-02355-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 03CV2355-B (WMC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIMCORE CORPORATION, a California

Corporation, ROMER INC., a California

Corporation, HOMER EATON, an

individual, and HEXAGON

METROLOGY AB,

Plaintiff,

v.

FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Florida

Corporation,

Defendant.

_________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No: 03 CV 2355-B(WMC)

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART

AND DENYING-IN-PART

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN

LIMINE NO.2 TO EXCLUDE

FARO’S EXPERT WITNESS

FROM TESTIFYING ABOUT

CERTAIN MATTERS

Plaintiff brought motion in limine No.2 to exclude Defendant’s expert Dr. Sidman

from testifying about a) motivation or suggestion to combine references presented in his

expert report, and b) any alleged prior art about which he had not provided an opinion in

his expert report or supplemental report. The Court now designates these as motions in

limine Nos. 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. The motions were initially heard on June 19, 2006. 

A second hearing was held on October 12, 2006 by telephonic conference.

Case 3:03-cv-02355-B-WMC Document 394 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 03CV2355-B (WMC)

As a result, the Court DENIES motion in limine No. 2(a) and GRANTS motion in

limine No. 2(b). 

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: October 13, 2006

Hon. Rudi M. Brewster

United States Senior District Judge

cc: Hon. William McCurine Jr.

 United States Magistrate Judge

 All Counsel of Record

Case 3:03-cv-02355-B-WMC Document 394 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 2