Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03773/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03773-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gordon &

Rees LLP

E

mbarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, C

A 94111

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE

TO COMPLETE PRIVATE MEDIATION CASE NO. C 05-03773 MJJ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIVEOPS, INC.,

Plaintiff

vs.

TELEO, INC., et al.

Defendant.

/

CASE NO. C 05-03773 MJJ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO 

COMPLETE PRIVATE MEDIATION

Complaint Filed: September 19, 2005

WHEREAS, on December 13, 2005, the parties stipulated to participate in private 

mediation through JAMS, AAA, or another similar service provider (“Private ADR Session”).

WHEREAS, on December 13, 2005, the parties stipulated to hold the Private ADR 

Session within 90 days from the date of the Court’s order referring the case to private mediation.

WHEREAS, on December 15, 2005, the Court adopted the parties’ December 13, 2005 

stipulation as an order, thereby requiring the parties to complete the Private ADR Session by 

March 15, 2006.

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed on Hon. Edward A. Infante (Ret.) of JAMS to 

conduct the Private ADR Session.

Case 3:05-cv-03773-MJJ Document 72 Filed 02/06/2006 Page 1 of 3

Granted

Case 3:05-cv-03773-MJJ Document 73 Filed 02/07/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gordon &

Rees LLP

E

mbarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, C

A 94111

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE

TO COMPLETE PRIVATE MEDIATION CASE NO. C 05-03773 MJJ

WHEREAS, it is necessary to extend the March 15, 2006 deadline to complete Private 

ADR Session because the first date that the parties, counsel for the parties, and the Hon. Edward 

A. Infante (Ret.) are all available to conduct the Private ADR Session is March 29, 2006.

WHEREAS, to date, the following time modifications have occurred in this action:

• On October 10, 2005, LiveOps and Teleo filed a stipulation extending Teleo’s 

time for responding to the Complaint to November 7, 2005. 

• On October 24, 2005, LiveOps and Brown filed a stipulation extending Brown’s 

time for responding to the Complaint to November 16, 2005. 

• On November 1, 2005, LiveOps and Teleo filed a stipulation extending Teleo’s 

time for responding to the Complaint to November 16, 2005.

• At Judge Jenkins request, on November 18, 2005, Brown re-noticed the hearing 

on his motion to dismiss from January 3, 2006 to January 10, 2006. 

• On December 6, 2005, Judge Jenkins issued an order granting the parties’ 

stipulation to reset the Initial Case Management Conference for January 10, 2006.

• On December 9, 2005, Judge Jenkins vacated the January 10, 2006 hearing date 

for Brown’s Motion to Compel and referred it and all other discovery matters to 

this Court.

• On December 12, 2005, Judge Jenkins reset the due date for the parties’ joint case 

management statement from January 3, 2006 to January 9, 2006 and the Initial 

Case Management Conference from January 10, 2006 to January 17, 2006.

• On December 13, 2005, Magistrate Judge Chen reset the hearing on Brown’s 

Motion to Compel for January 18, 2006.

• On January 5, 2006, Judge Jenkins reset the due date for the parties’ joint case 

management statement to February 12, 2006 and the Initial Case Management 

Conference for February 21, 2006

• On January 20, 2006, Magistrate Judge Chen ordered that: (a) the parties to meet 

and confer on a stipulated protective order and file such an order by January 25, 

2006; (b) Plaintiff serve its disclosure pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. Code 

§ 2019.210 under such protective order by February 6, 2006; (c) Defendants serve 

their initial disclosures by January 25, 2006; and (d) the parties meet and confer 

and file a joint discovery plan by February 10, 2006.

• On January 26, 2006, in response to the parties’ request, Magistrate Judge Chen 

granting an extension of two days to file a stipulated protective order to January 

27, 2006.

WHEREAS, extending the deadline to complete the Private ADR Session to April 7, 

2006 will provide the parties sufficient time to conduct the Private Mediation Session on March 

29, 2006 and not have an adverse affect on the schedule of this case.

Case 3:05-cv-03773-MJJ Document 72 Filed 02/06/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-03773-MJJ Document 73 Filed 02/07/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gordon &

Rees LLP

E

mbarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, C

A 94111

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE

TO COMPLETE PRIVATE MEDIATION CASE NO. C 05-03773 MJJ

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this 

action, by and through their respective counsel, that the deadline to complete the Private ADR 

Session is extended to April 7, 2006.

DATED: February 6, 2006 GORDON & REES LLP

/s/ Jeffrey M. Ratinoff

By:

Jeffrey M. Ratinoff

Attorneys for Plaintiff LIVEOPS, INC.

DATED: February 6, 2006 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

/s/ Maureen A. Sheehy

By:

Maureen A. Sheehy

Attorneys for Defendant WENDELL BROWN.

DATED: February 6, 2006 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

/s/ Hojoon Hwang

By:

Hojoon Hwang

Attorneys for Defendant TELEO, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February ___, 2006

 __________________________________________

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

LOPS\1033315\954961.1

Case 3:05-cv-03773-MJJ Document 72 Filed 02/06/2006 Page 3 of 3

7

Case 3:05-cv-03773-MJJ Document 73 Filed 02/07/06 Page 3 of 3