Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04585/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04585-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE

MOTION HEARING AND ASSOCIATED DATES

Case Nos. C00-20500 RMWı

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Howard G. Pollack (#162897) pollack@fr.com

Katherine D. Prescott (#215496) prescott@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

Redwood City, California 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PLS-PACIFIC LASER SYSTEMS

Mary Jo Shartsis (# 55194) mjshartsis@sflaw.com

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 421-6500

Facsimile: (415) 421-2922

Attorneys for Defendants

TLZ INC., ROBOTOOLZ, INC., TOOLZ

GMBH, TOOLZ, LTD., JOSEPH

SCHUCHERT III, ANDREW BUTLER,

EDMUND SHEA, FRANK FERACO, and

ABBOTT STILLMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN JOSE DIVISION)

PLS-PACIFIC LASER SYSTEMS,

a California general partnership,

Plaintiff,

v.

TLZ INC., a California corporation,

dba TOOLZ, ROBOTOOLZ, INC., a California

corporation, TOOLZ GMBH, a German limited

liability company, and TOOLZ, LTD., a Hong

Hong limited liability company, JOSEPH

SCHUCHERT III, ANDREW BUTLER,

EDMUND SHEA, FRANK FERACO, and

ABBOTT STILLMAN

Defendants.

Case Nos. C00-20500 RMW

C06-04585 RMW

STIPULATION AND []

ORDER TO RESCHEDULE MOTION

HEARING AND ASSOCIATED DATES

AND RELATED CASE.

*E-FILED - 4/3/07*

Case 5:06-cv-04585-RMW Document 55 Filed 04/03/07 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO R LESDH 

MOTION HEARING AND ASSOCIATED DATES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective

counsel, pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, that, subject to the approval of this Court, the

hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim and

motion to quash service and dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or venue noticed for

March 9, 2007, at 9:00 a.m., be heard on March 16, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. This request is made in

light of the Court’s scheduling of the Case Management Conference for March 16, 2007 and to

accommodate the schedule of Plaintiff’s counsel. It should not effect the case schedule. Previous

changes to the case schedule include an extension of time for Defendants to respond to the

Amended Complaint and the rescheduling of the Case Management Conference from February 2,

2007, to March 16, 2007.

The parties further stipulate that the last day for Plaintiff to oppose Defendants’ motions

shall be February 20, 2007, and that the last day for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s

oppositions shall be March 2, 2007.

Dated: February 7, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Katherine D. Prescott

Katherine D. Prescott

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PLS-PACIFIC LASER SYSTEMS

Dated: February 7, 2007 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

By: /s/ Mary Jo Shartsis

Mary Jo Shartsis

Attorneys for Defendants

TLZ INC., ROBOTOOLZ, INC., TOOLZ

GMBH, TOOLZ, LTD., JOSEPH

SCHUCHERT III, ANDREW BUTLER,

EDMUND SHEA, FRANK FERACO, and

ABBOTT STILLMAN

Case 5:06-cv-04585-RMW Document 55 Filed 04/03/07 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO R LESDH 

MOTION HEARING AND ASSOCIATED DATES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Mary Jo

Shartsis.

Dated: February 7, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Katherine D. Prescott

Katherine D. Prescott

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PLS-PACIFIC LASER SYSTEMS

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the Court orders that the Defendants’ motions noticed for hearing

on March 9, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. shall be heard on March 16, 2007, at 9:00 a.m.. The Court further

orders that Plaintiff’s last day to oppose Defendants’ motions shall be February 20, 2007, and that

Defendants’ last day to respond to Plaintiff’s oppositions shall be March 2, 2007.

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________

Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Court Judge

50398430.doc

4/3/07

Case 5:06-cv-04585-RMW Document 55 Filed 04/03/07 Page 3 of 3