Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05814/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05814-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHNNY GRAY, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOVERNOR GRAY DAVIS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:03-CV-5814-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER DISREGARDING FILING OF JUNE

21, 2005

(Doc. 64)

Plaintiff Johnny Gray (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 31, 2005, in compliance with the

Court’s Orders of September 30, 2004, November 22, 2004, and April 25, 2005, plaintiff filed a

second amended complaint. On June 21, 2005, plaintiff filed what at first appeared to be a third

amended complaint, absent leave of court.

It is not entirely clear what plaintiff’s filing of June 21, 2005, is intended to be. Although

the first page of the filing is entitled “Amended Complaint,” the second page is entitled “Objections

to Magistrate Judge Findings and Recommendations” and the attached proof of service describes the

filing as an Objection. There are no Findings and Recommendations pending which require

responses from plaintiff. The most recent Findings and Recommendations was filed on April 25,

2005. Plaintiff filed an Objection on June 6, 2005, and the Findings and Recommendations was

adopted in full on June 17, 2005. Although the Findings and Recommendations filed on August 13,

2004, is still pending, plaintiff filed an Objection on September 22, 2004. Plaintiff has already been

warned by the Court that he may not file multiple responses to the Court’s orders. (Doc. 56, 2:3-4.)

Case 1:03-cv-05814-AWI -SMS Document 65 Filed 07/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In light of the facts that the exact nature of plaintiff’s filing cannot be determined, that

plaintiff was not given leave to file a third amended complaint, and that there are no Findings and

Recommendations pending which require a response from plaintiff, plaintiff’sfiling ofJune 21, 2005

is HEREBY DISREGARDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 12, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05814-AWI -SMS Document 65 Filed 07/13/05 Page 2 of 2