Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_16-cv-00190/USCOURTS-almd-2_16-cv-00190-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER TAYLOR, #291 115, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-190-WHA 

) [WO]

VALENCIA LOCKHART, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On April 4, 2016, Plaintiff filed an amendment to his complaint which the court considers 

to contain a Motion to Dismiss Defendants Graves and Baker as parties to this cause of action. 

Upon review of the motion, the court concludes that it should be granted.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that:

1. Plaintiff’s April 4, 2016, Motion to Dismiss Defendants Graves and Baker (Doc. 9), be 

GRANTED;

2. Defendants Graves and Baker be DISMISSED with prejudice as parties to this 

complaint; and

3. This case with respect to the remaining defendants be referred to the undersigned for 

additional proceedings.

It is further

ORDERED that on or before May 12, 2016, Plaintiff may file any objections to this 

Recommendation. A party must specifically identify the factual findings and legal conclusions in 

the Recommendation to which objection is made; frivolous, conclusive, or general objections will 

not be considered. 

Case 2:16-cv-00190-WHA-TFM Document 11 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Failure to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations 

in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) shall bar a party from a de novo

determination by the District Court of legal and factual issues covered in the Recommendation and 

waives the right of the party to challenge on appeal the district court’s order based on unobjectedto factual and legal conclusions accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of 

plain error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982); 11th Cir. R. 

3-1. See Stein v. Lanning Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City 

of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc).

DONE, this 27th day of April 2016.

/s/Terry F. Moorer 

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-00190-WHA-TFM Document 11 Filed 04/27/16 Page 2 of 2