Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01345/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01345-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH A. SHERMAN, No. CIV.S-06-1345 MCE DAD PS

Plaintiff,

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

PRESIDENT OF U.C. REGENTS

DYNES, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding in this action pro se, initiated this

action by filing his complaint on June 19, 2006. This proceeding was

referred to this court by Local Rule 72-302(c)(21), pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

By order filed November 7, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to

pay the appropriate filing fee or submit an affidavit making the

showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff was forewarned

that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed. The twenty-day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not paid the appropriate filing fee or submitted an

Case 2:06-cv-01345-MCE -DAD Document 5 Filed 12/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

affidavit making the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). 

Accordingly, the court HEREBY RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See L.R. 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the

United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being

served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be

captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.

1991).

DATED: December 11, 2006.

DAD:lg

ddad1/orders.prose/sherman1345.f&r

Case 2:06-cv-01345-MCE -DAD Document 5 Filed 12/12/06 Page 2 of 2