Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04173/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04173-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

C 05-04173 MJJ 

Stipulation of Dismissal; [Proposed] Order 

Sonja S. Weissman (SBN 154320) 

Kendra J. Jue (SBN 226992) 

REED SMITH LLP

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2400 

Oakland, CA 94612-3572 

Telephone: 510.763.2000 

Facsimile: 510.273.8832 

sweissman@reedsmith.com

kjue@reedsmith.com

Michael K. Brown (SBN 104252) 

REED SMITH LLP

355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514 

Telephone: 213.456.8000 

Facsimile: 213.457.8080 

mkbrown@reedsmith.com

Lori G. Cohen (Pro Hac Vice) 

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 

3290 Northside Parkway 

Suite 400 

Atlanta, GA 30327 

Telephone: (678) 553-2100 

Facsimile: (678) 553-2212 

cohenl@gtlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Medtronic, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PERRY TUCKER, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MEDTRONIC, INC., and DOES 1 through 

20, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

No.: C 05-04173 MJJ 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

Case 3:05-cv-04173-MJJ Document 25 Filed 11/08/2005 Page 1 of 4

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

C 05-04173 MJJ – 1 – 

Stipulation of Dismissal; [Proposed] Order 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties to this action, 

Perry Tucker (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and MEDTRONIC, INC. (hereinafter “Medtronic”), by and 

through their respective undersigned counsel, and approved by the Court in the accompanying 

Order, as follows: 

1. That this action is dismissed without prejudice; 

2. That if Plaintiff elects to file a future action asserting the same claims asserted in the 

instant action, (1) Plaintiff will initiate the new action in the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California and that (2) Plaintiff will name in the new action the same defendants 

named in this action and no other defendants. Plaintiff reserves his right to move the Court for leave 

to amend the complaint in the subsequent action, should Plaintiff determine that such amendment is 

necessary. Medtronic reserves its right to oppose any such motion for leave to amend the complaint. 

3. Plaintiff and Medtronic agree that there shall be no tolling of any applicable statute of 

limitations. 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

/ / / / 

Case 3:05-cv-04173-MJJ Document 25 Filed 11/08/2005 Page 2 of 4

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

C 05-04173 MJJ – 2 – 

Stipulation of Dismissal; [Proposed] Order 

4. Each party to bear its own costs. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: November 8, 2005 

 TEAL & MONTGOMERY 

 Concurrence in the filing of this document 

 has been obtained from the signatory

 By ____________________________________ 

 Michael Henderson, Esq. 

 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF PERRY 

 TUCKER 

 -and- 

 Dated: November 8, 2005 

 REED SMITH LLP

 By /s/ 

 Michael K. Brown, Esq. 

 Sonja S. Weissman, Esq. 

 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

 MEDTRONIC, INC. 

Case 3:05-cv-04173-MJJ Document 25 Filed 11/08/2005 Page 3 of 4

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

C 05-04173 MJJ – 3 – 

Stipulation of Dismissal; [Proposed] Order 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 DATED: 11/8 , 2005. 

Hon. Martin J. Jenkins 

Judge of the United States District Court 

Case 3:05-cv-04173-MJJ Document 25 Filed 11/08/2005 Page 4 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Martin J. Jenkins