Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02042/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02042-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

STIPULATION & [Proposed] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY 

TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Dumaguit v. Potter, No. C-06-02-42 JSW Page 1

MARY DRYOVAGE, (CA SBN 112551) 

Law Offices of Mary Dryovage 

 600 Harrison Street, Suite 120, 

 San Francisco, CA 94107 

 Telephone: 415 593-0095 

 Fax. 415 593-0096 

 Email: mdryovage@igc.org

WENDY MUSELL (CA SBN 203507) 

Stewart & Musell 

 600 Harrison Street, Suite 120 

 San Francisco, CA 94107 

 Telephone: 415/593-0083 

 Fax: 415/520-0920, 

 Email: wmusell@stewartandmusell.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

GERALD DUMAGUIT 

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SC 9990) 

United States Attorney 

JOANN M. SWANSON (SBN 88143) 

Chief, Civil Division 

ANDREW Y.S. CHENG (SBN 164613) 

Assistant United States Attorney 

 450 Golden Gate Avenue,10th Floor 

 San Francisco, CA 94102-3495 

 Telephone: 415 436-6813 

 Fax: 415 436-6748 

 Email: andrew.cheng@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendant 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GERALD DUMAGUIT, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER 

GENERAL 

 Defendant. 

No. C-06-2042 JSW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

PLAINTIFF TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S 

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Case 3:06-cv-02042-JSW Document 52 Filed 08/30/07 Page 1 of 3
Subject to the approval of the court, Plaintiff and Defendant (hereinafter “the Parties”) 

hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. Plaintiff Gerald Dumaguit’s father died on August 28, 2007, after sustaining a 

stroke one week prior. Plaintiff is responsible for burial and funeral 

arrangements for his father and must attend the funeral. Plaintiff’s participation 

and approval is fundamental to Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion 

for Summary Judgment that is due before this Court on August 31, 2007. As a 

result of his father’s illness and death, Plaintiff has not been available, and will 

not be available until Thursday, September 6, 2007, to assist with this briefing. 

2. The parties agree that such facts constitute “good cause” for a request for

additional days to file Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment. Therefore, the Parties stipulate that Plaintiff’s Reply in 

Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is due to the Court and 

Defendant on September 6, 2007. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

FOR THE DEFENDANT: 

 

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS 

 United States Attorney

Dated: _____/s/_____________________ 

 ANDREW Y.S. CHENG

 Assistant United States Attorney 

STIPULATION & [Proposed] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY 

TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Dumaguit v. Potter, No. C-06-02-42 JSW Page 2

Case 3:06-cv-02042-JSW Document 52 Filed 08/30/07 Page 2 of 3
FOR THE PLAINTIFF: 

Dated: _____/s/______________________ 

 MARY DRYOVAGE 

Dated: _____/s/______________________ 

 WENDY MUSELL 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: __________________________________ 

 JEFFREY S. WHITE

 United States District Judge 

 

STIPULATION & [Proposed] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY 

TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Dumaguit v. Potter, No. C-06-02-42 JSW Page 3

Because the stipulation suggests that Plaintiff will be unvailable until September 6, which is the date 

on which the parties propose to submit the reply brief, the Court shall give Plaintiff until September 

13, 2007 to file the reply brief. August 30, 2007

Case 3:06-cv-02042-JSW Document 52 Filed 08/30/07 Page 3 of 3