Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04834/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04834-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Sebastian DeFrancesco,

 

Sheryl Mifsud and Paul Mifsud,

Plaintiff(s),

 v.

Chateau Masson, LLC., et al.,

Defendant(s).

 

 Chateau Masson, LLC., et al.,

 Third Party Plaintiff

 v.

 Bill Graham Presents, Inc., et al.

 Third Party Defendants

 /

NO. C 04-04834 JW

NO. C 05-01400 JW

ORDER FOLLOWING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

On August 22, 2005, the Court conducted a case management conference. Paul Rein, appeared

on behalf of the Plaintiffs; Bernard Greenfield appeared on behalf of Chateau Masson; and Valerie Sharpe

appeared on behalf of Bill Graham, the third party defendant.

At the conference, the parties informed the Court that Plaintiffs Defrancesco and Mifsud have

reached a settlement with Defendant Chateau Masson. In light of the settlement, the Court vacates all trial

and pretrial dates. On or before September 16, 2005, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). 

Case 5:04-cv-04834-JW Document 40 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, all parties shall appear in Courtroom No. 8, 4th

Floor, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, Ca. on September 26, 2005, at

9:00 a.m. and to show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(b). On or before September 16, 2005, the parties shall file a joint statement in response to the Order

to Show Cause. The joint statement shall set forth the status of the activities of the parties for finalizing the

settlement and how much additional time is requested to finalize and file the dismissal. If a voluntary

dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated.

As to the indemnity action between Chateau Masson and Bill Graham Enterprises, counsels

informed the Court that the parties have agreed to meet out of counsel’s presence in an effort to resolve

their issues. Thus, the Court sets October 31, 2005 at 10 a.m. as a date for further case management in

this matter. Should the parties reach an agreement prior to this date, the parties shall promptly notify the

Court.

Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss this

action.

Dated: August 23, 2005 /s/ James Ware 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:04-cv-04834-JW Document 40 Filed 08/23/05 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Bernard S. Greenfield bgreenfield@mghhsj.com

Brian J. Hannon bhannon@mghhsj.com

Clifford E. Yin EfilingCEY@cpdb.com

Julie McLean juliemclean@reinlawoffice.com

Patricia Barbosa pbarbosa@reinlawoffice.com

Paul L. Rein reinlawoffice@aol.com

Susan K. Jamison EfilingSKJ@cpdb.com

Valerie L. Sharpe vsharpe@littler.com

Dated: August 23, 2005 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By:___/s/ JW Chambers______________

Ronald L. Davis

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:04-cv-04834-JW Document 40 Filed 08/23/05 Page 3 of 3