Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01534/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01534-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHRYN HOOD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1534 MCE EFB PS

vs.

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF 

THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

Defendants.

 /

By order filed August 8, 2006, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to

file an amended complaint within thirty days. The order warned that failure to file an amended

complaint within that time period would result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. 

The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

Case 2:06-cv-01534-MCE -EFB Document 5 Filed 09/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right

to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998);

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: September 26, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-01534-MCE -EFB Document 5 Filed 09/27/06 Page 2 of 2