Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01596/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01596-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROOSEVELT ASHIM LANDS, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-1596 GEB CMK P

vs.

PEOPLE IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis

with this application for a writ of habeas corpus. This proceeding was referred to this court by

Local Rule 72-302 by the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

By order filed October 18, 2006, the court dismissed petitioner’s habeas

application for failure to name the proper respondent. Petitioner was granted thirty days to file

an amended petition. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an

amended petition or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that petitioner’s habeas

application be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

///

///

Case 2:06-cv-01596-GEB-CMK Document 12 Filed 12/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Martinez

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 12, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01596-GEB-CMK Document 12 Filed 12/12/06 Page 2 of 2