Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06194/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06194-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT AYALA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

C.D.C., et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06194-REC-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 22)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH

RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED 

Plaintiff Robert Ayala (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On February 22, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that an objection to the

Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. 

On May 22, 2006, after re-service of the Findings and

Recommendations, plaintiff filed an objection.

///

Case 1:04-cv-06194-REC-LJO Document 26 Filed 05/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 22,

2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for failure

to state any claims upon which relief may be granted; and

3. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 25, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06194-REC-LJO Document 26 Filed 05/25/06 Page 2 of 2