Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00490/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00490-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

DANIEL P. TALBERT

Special Assistant United States Attorney

333 Market Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8926

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: Daniel.Talbert@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

CARRIE JAMIESON, ) Case No. 1:09-CV-00490-LJO-DLB

Plaintiff, )

v. ) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF

Commissioner of Social Security, ) 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY

Defendant. ) OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND

______________________________) AGAINST DEFENDANT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective

counsel of record, that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further

administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.

§ 405(g), sentence four.

On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to take

the following action:

The ALJ will be directed to update the medical record, and to offer Plaintiff a new hearing

and the opportunity to present new evidence. Where it is warranted, the ALJ shall give

appropriate weight to the opinion of Plaintiff’s treating physician, and consider the entire record in

making a new credibility determination. The ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert

evidence, and will ensure that the hypothetical questions to the vocational expert will include all

the claimant’s limitations.

1

Case 1:09-cv-00490-LJO-DLB Document 21 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties stipulate that no specific aspect of the ALJ’s prior decision will be affirmed.

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment

in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security, reversing the final

decision of the Commissioner.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: March 9, 2010 s/ Harvey Sackett 

(As authorized by email)

HARVEY SACKETT

Attorney for Plaintiff Carrie Jamieson

Date: March 9, 2010 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

 By s/ Daniel P. Talbert 

DANIEL P. TALBERT

Special Assistant U. S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-00490-LJO-DLB Document 21 Filed 03/15/10 Page 2 of 2