Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-09-03716/USCOURTS-ca8-09-03716-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-3716

___________

Adam Paul Strege, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Deutsche Hypotheken Bank, and its *

subsidiaries; Cathy Bowman, and her *

Husband and his Underwriting *

Company; Cathy Bowman’s Daughter, *

the Afghanistan Ambassador, Her *

Husband the Swiss Banker, the Swiss * Appeal from the United States

Bank he works for; Cathy Bowman’s * District Court for the

Son, that deals with Embezzlement in * District of Minnesota.

Washington, D.C.; Cathy Bowman’s *

Children, Both in their official and * [UNPUBLISHED]

unofficial capacity; Pasco M. Bowman, *

In his official and unofficial capacity; *

James B. Loken, In his official and *

unofficial capacity; Opus Construction *

Company; Wilson McShane; William *

H. Stephenson; Rob, at 1892 Feronia *

Ave.; Judy McCoy, And Husband in *

official and unofficial capacity; Brian *

Obert, In his official and unofficial *

capacity; Homeowner at 452 Laurel *

Ave., and her ex-husband in his *

official and unofficial capacity; *

Sahara McGee, Minnesota Attorney *

General in official and unofficial *

capacity; West Law, and the company *

at 610 Opperman Drive; Gerald *

Appellate Case: 09-3716 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/20/2010 Entry ID: 3666624
1

The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 

-2-

Rauenhorst; U.S. Bancorp; U.S. Bank; *

Landesbank Baden Wuerttemberg; *

North Central States Regional Council *

of Carpenters; United States of *

America, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: May 17, 2010

Filed: May 20, 2010

___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Adam Paul Strege appeals the district court’s1

 order granting defendants’

motions to dismiss his complaint. The district court reasoned, in part, that Strege’s

complaint, which consisted of unintelligible allegations of conspiracy to conceal

murder and other wrongdoing on the part of the named individuals and entities, failed

to state a claim upon which relief could be granted against any defendant. Following

careful de novo review, we agree. See Friends of Lake View Sch. Dist. Inc. No. 25

v. Beebe, 578 F.3d 753, 758 (8th Cir. 2009) (court may affirm on any basis record

supports); see also Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554-55, 570 (2007)

(to survive motion to dismiss for failure to state claim, complaint must contain enough

facts to state claim to relief that is plausible on its face); Carter v. Arkansas, 392 F.3d

965, 968 (8th Cir. 2004) (de novo review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________

Appellate Case: 09-3716 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/20/2010 Entry ID: 3666624