Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03418/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03418-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Plaintiff and Counterclaim

Defendant

 v.

ROSS J. MILLER, et al.,

Defendants and

Counterclaimants /

No. C-05-3418 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On December 2, 2005, plaintiff electronically filed its Reply in Support of Motion to

Dismiss Amended Counterclaims and Strike Prayer for Relief, and the Declaration of

Richard E. Elder in support of the reply. Plaintiff has violated General Order 45 and the

Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than

noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one

paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and

. . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not

File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned

to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

Case 3:05-cv-03418-MMC Document 41 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

documents. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the Court’s

Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court

may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 7, 2005 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03418-MMC Document 41 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 2