Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01966/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01966-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WALTER C. WATSON, No. 2:06-cv-1966-MCE-DAD-P

Petitioner,

v. ORDER

B. CURRY, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 11, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Pursuant to an extension

of time granted by the magistrate judge on October 16, 2006, petitioner has filed a document

titled “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.”

///

///

Case 2:06-cv-01966-MCE -DAD Document 9 Filed 11/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Petitioner concedes the facts set forth in the findings and recommendations and accepts

the recommendation that his petition be dismissed without prejudice so that he may seek a Ninth

Circuit order authorizing this court to consider a second or successive application.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304,

this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 11, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: November 1, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01966-MCE -DAD Document 9 Filed 11/02/06 Page 2 of 2