Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00945/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00945-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Although the copy of the Report and Recommendation mailed to the

plaintiff at his address of record was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as

undeliverable because the plaintiff no longer resided there and no forwarding

address was available (doc. #9), the Court notes that the plaintiff was specifically

warned in the Court’s order entered on May 15, 2006 (doc. #6) that it was his

responsibility to keep the Court notified of his current mailing address and that his

failure to do so could result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jerry L. Williams, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

Joseph Arpaio, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-0945-PHX-PGR (MEA)

 

 ORDER

Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Aspey notwithstanding that the petitioner has not filed any objection to it1

,

the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly concluded that this action

should be dismissed without prejudice due to the plaintiff’s failure to return the

service packet by June 4, 2006, as ordered by the Court on May 15, 2006 (doc.

#6), and due to the plaintiff’s failure to show cause by August 31, 2007, as

Case 2:06-cv-00945-PGR Document 10 Filed 11/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

- 2 -

ordered by the Magistrate Judge on August 2, 2007 (doc. #7), why this action

should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the Court’s order of May

15th and for his failure to effect timely service of process. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(doc. #8) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice

pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). The Clerk of the Court

shall enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 27th day of November, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00945-PGR Document 10 Filed 11/28/07 Page 2 of 2