Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-02054/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-02054-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

M IG U EL M Á R Q U E Z

 A cting County Counsel

County of Santa Clara

S an Jose, California Stipulation and Order for Dismissal 1 C03-2054 RMW

MIGUEL MÁRQUEZ, Acting County Counsel (S.B. #184621)

MELISSA R. KINIAYLOCTS, Lead Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #151915)

MARCY L. BERKMAN, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #151915)

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL

70 West Hedding, East Wing, 9 Floor th

San Jose, California 95110-1770

Telephone: (408) 299-5900

Facsimile: (408) 292-7240

Attorneys for Defendants

EDWARD FLORES, LIEUTENANT

DOUGLAS TAYLOR, MITCHELL

CONNER, MICHAEL MEADE, M.D.,

CHRISTINE FERRY, ALEXANDER

CHYORNY, M.D., and OFFICER CONNER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(San Jose)

DAVID LITMON, JR., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

SANTA CLARA COUNTY, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

__________________________________)

No. C03-2054 RMW

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, David Litmon (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Edward Flores, Lieutenant Douglas

Taylor, Mitchell Conner, Michael Meade, M.D., Christine Ferry, Alexander Chyorny, M.D.,

and Officer Conner (“Defendants”), hereby stipulate and agree to a binding Court order as

follows:

Whereas on May 2, 2003 Plaintiff filed a complaint.

Whereas on March 29, 2004 this Court ordered service of the operative Second Amended

Complaint.

Whereas on March 31, 2009 the court granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary

Judgment and entered Judgment in favor of Defendants.

Whereas on May 29, 2009 Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal.

*E-FILED - 1/21/10*

Case 5:03-cv-02054-RMW Document 105 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

M IG U EL M Á R Q U E Z

 A cting County Counsel

County of Santa Clara

S an Jose, California Stipulation and Order for Dismissal 2 C03-2054 RMW

Whereas the Ninth Circuit has not docketed that appeal due to a separately existing Ninth

Circuit pre-filing order governing pro per appeals filed by Plaintiff.

Whereas during the Settlement Conference on November 13, 2009 the parties entered into

a global settlement agreement involving Case Nos. C00-20345, C03-2054, and C09-2158.

Whereas Plaintiff and Defendant agree to waive any claim for costs and/or attorneys’ fees

against one another.

Now therefore, pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the

parties stipulate that the District Court may dismiss this appeal.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: January ___,2010 By: 

DAVID LITMON, JR.

Plaintiff in Pro Per

Dated: January 20, 2010

MIGUEL MÁRQUEZ

Acting County Counsel

By: /S/ 

MELISSA R. KINIYALOCTS

Lead Deputy County Counsel

Attorneys for Defendants

EDWARD FLORES, LIEUTENANT

DOUGLAS TAYLOR, MITCHELL

CONNER, MICHAEL MEADE, M.D.,

CHRISTINE FERRY, ALEXANDER

CHYORNY, M.D., and OFFICER

CONNER

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s appeal from District Court Case No. C03-2054

is dismissed. 

Dated:_______________ ____________________________

RONALD M. WHYTE

235677.wpd Judge of the Superior Court

1/21/10

Case 5:03-cv-02054-RMW Document 105 Filed 01/21/10 Page 2 of 2