Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02012/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02012-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD M. ANAYA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JANE C. PANDELL, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-02012-DMR 

ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Re: Dkt. No. 9

The court has reviewed Defendant Jane Curran Pandell’s motion for an extension of time 

to respond to Plaintiff Edward M. Anaya’s complaint and request to shorten time on the motion. 

[Docket No. 9.] The court will treat Defendant’s motion as a motion for administrative relief 

pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11. Any opposition by Plaintiff is due by no later than 5:00 

p.m. on June 5, 2015. Defendant’s request to shorten time on the motion is denied as moot. The 

court will rule on the motion on June 8, 2015, in conformance with the local rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 5, 2015

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:15-cv-02012-DMR Document 10 Filed 06/05/15 Page 1 of 1