Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02847/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02847-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLEN D. ROBERTSON,

Plaintiff,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant. /

No. C 06-02847 CRB

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, proceeding in pro se, filed this action to challenge defendant’s denial of

plaintiff’s application for social security disability benefits. Defendant filed an answer to the

complaint on July 26, 2006. Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rules, plaintiff’s motion for

summary judgment should have been filed on or before August 30, 2006. Civil Local Rule

16-5. As of November 2006, however, plaintiff had not filed a motion and had not otherwise

communicated with the Court.

Accordingly, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause why his action should not be

dismissed for lack of prosecution. In particular, the Court ordered plaintiff to file his motion

for summary judgment on or before December 22, 2006. The Court specifically warned 

plaintiff that his failure to file his motion by December 22, 2006 might result in 

dismissal of his action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 for a failure to 

Case 3:06-cv-02847-CRB Document 11 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2006\2847\orderofdismissal.wpd 2

prosecute. The Order was served on plaintiff at the address he provided to the Court in June

2006.

As of the date of this Order plaintiff has not filed his motion for summary judgment

and has not otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 41 this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: Feb. 13, 2007

 /s/ 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-02847-CRB Document 11 Filed 02/13/07 Page 2 of 2