Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-36/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-13-3826 EMC 

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ORDER

In connection with its opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, Defendants

prepared charts that summarize the contents of the various agreements in this case. It appears,

however, that some of the charts may not capture all 17 agreements at issue. For instance, Exhibit

53 to the Evangelis Declaration does not appear to contain entries regarding the four “driver

addenda” in the record. See, e.g., Coleman Decl, Ex. E. For the sake of completeness, the Court

asks Uber to file updated and complete chart(s) by Tuesday, August 4, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 31, 2015

_________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 321 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 1