Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01681/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-01681-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HARVEY L. WILBOURN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SHASTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:23-cv-01681-EFB (PC) 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By an order filed August 22, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 

pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his institutional trust account statement, and was 

cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.1

 

The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and 

has not filed the required documents. 

 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 

 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

1

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the August 22, 2023 order was returned, 

plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his 

current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record 

address of the party is fully effective. 

Case 2:23-cv-01681-KJM-EFB Document 4 Filed 12/06/23 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: December 6, 2023 

Case 2:23-cv-01681-KJM-EFB Document 4 Filed 12/06/23 Page 2 of 2