Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00595/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00595-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Marvin A. Saunders, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social 

Security, 

Defendant.

No. CV-08-595-PHX-DGC

ORDER 

 In a memorandum decision dated May 12, 2011, the Court of Appeals for the 

Ninth Circuit reversed the judgment affirming Defendant’s denial of social security 

benefits to Plaintiff, finding that the ALJ improperly discredited Plaintiff’s testimony and 

erred in determining his residual functional capacity. Doc. 31-1. The Court of Appeals 

remanded for further proceedings consistent with its disposition. Id. at 5. The parties, at 

the Court’s direction (Doc. 34), have filed memoranda addressing how the case should 

proceed on remand (Docs. 36, 37). 

 Defendant asserts that the agency should revisit the credibility determination 

(Doc. 36 at 2), but presents no legal authority in support of this assertion. Because the 

ALJ failed to provide the requisite clear and convincing reasons for rejecting his 

symptom testimony, Plaintiff argues, that testimony is to be accepted as true and the case 

remanded for an award of benefits. Doc. 37 at 3-5. The Court agrees. 

 This Circuit has held that an action should be remanded for an award of benefits 

where the ALJ has failed to provide legally sufficient reasons for rejecting evidence, no 

Case 2:08-cv-00595-DGC Document 38 Filed 08/25/11 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

outstanding issue remains that must be resolved before a determination of disability can 

be made, and it is clear from the record that the ALJ would be required to find the 

claimant disabled were the rejected evidence credited as true. See, e.g., Varney v. Sec’y 

of HHS, 859 F.2d 1396, 1400 (9th Cir. 1988). 

 After applying the credit-as-true rule to improperly discredited evidence, no 

outstanding issue remains to be resolved before determining that Plaintiff is entitled to 

benefits. The impartial vocational expert testified that Plaintiff’s symptom testimony, if 

accepted, would preclude all work. Doc. 9A, Tr. 360-61. Defendant does not disagree 

with this conclusion. Because it is clear that the ALJ would be required to find Plaintiff 

disabled, the Court will remand the case for an award of benefits. See Benecke v 

Barnhart, 379 F.3d 587, 593-95 (9th Cir. 2004); Orn v. Astrue, 495 F.3d 625, 640 (9th 

Cir. 2007). 

IT IS ORDERED:

 1. The case is remanded to Defendant for an award of benefits. 

 2. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. 

 Dated this 25th day of August, 2011. 

 

Case 2:08-cv-00595-DGC Document 38 Filed 08/25/11 Page 2 of 2