Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01697/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01697-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

-1-

REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No.: C07-1697 MMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607) 

Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) 

SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 

120 Howard Street, Suite 520 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

(415) 882-7900 

(415) 882-9287 – Facsimile 

mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com

mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GIL CROSTHWAITE, RUSS BURNS, in their 

respective capacities as Trustees of the 

OPERATING ENGNEERS HEALTH AND 

WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA; PENSION TRUST FUND FOR 

OPERATING ENGINEERS; PENSIONED 

OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH AND 

WELFARE FUND; OPERATING 

ENGINEERS AND PARTICIPATING 

EMPLOYERS PRE-APPRENTICESHIP, 

APPRENTICE AND JOURNEYMEN 

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TRAINING FUND; 

OPERATING ENGINEERS VACATION AND 

HOLIDAY PLAN; OPERATING ENGINEERS 

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION TRUST 

FUND; OPERATING ENGINEERS MARKET 

PRESERVATION TRUST FUND; 

OPERATING ENGINEERS INDUSTRY 

STABILIZATION TRUST FUND; BUSINESS 

DEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND; and 

HEAVY AND HIGHWAY COMMITTEE, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

R.E. SERRANO, INC., a California 

corporation, and RICKY SERRANO, 

individually,

Defendants.

Case No.: C07-1697 MMC 

REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

DATE: July 6, 2007 

TIME: 10:30 a.m. 

COURTROOM: 7, 19th Floor 

JUDGE: The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

Case 3:07-cv-01697-MMC Document 14 Filed 06/20/07 Page 1 of 2
-2-

REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case No.: C07-1697 MMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The newly substituted counsel has recently received this file and hereby respectfully 

requests that the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for July 6, 2007 at 10:30 

a.m., be continued for approximately 60 days to allow counsel to review the case, analyze the 

parties’ positions and any possibility of resolution, and respond as necessary. 

 It is furthermore requested that all previously set deadlines and dates related to this case be 

continued as well. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the attorney for the plaintiffs in the above 

entitled action, and that the foregoing is true of my own knowledge. 

 Executed this 15th day of June, 2007, at San Francisco, California. 

 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 

 By: _________________/s/__________________ 

 Muriel B. Kaplan 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 The currently set Case Management Conference is hereby continued to 

__________________________ at __________________. 

Date: _________________________ __________________________________ 

 United States District Court Judge 

September 7, 2007 10:30 a.m.

June 20, 2007

Case 3:07-cv-01697-MMC Document 14 Filed 06/20/07 Page 2 of 2