Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02178/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02178-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMOS G. SNELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 

COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-2178 DAD

ORDER SETTING STATUS

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

On February 3, 2014, this case was reassigned to the undersigned pursuant to the consent 

of the parties. (Dkt. No. 18.)

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, May 9, 2014, at 

10:00 a.m. at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom 

No. 27 before the undersigned;

2. Any party may appear at the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference 

telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom 

deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128 at least 48 hours before the Status 

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference. A land line telephone number must be provided;

/////

Case 2:13-cv-02178-DAD Document 20 Filed 03/25/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before April 25, 2014, and 

defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before May 2, 2014. Each party’s status report 

shall address all of the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Possible amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including 

disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off 

dates for discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a 

final pretrial conference and trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules 

due to the relative simplicity or complexity of the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in 

bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned 

to this matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any 

disqualification by virtue of his so acting, or whether they prefer to 

have a Settlement Conference before another magistrate judge;

k. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a United 

States Magistrate Judge; and

l. Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious 

disposition of this action.

4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a timely status report, or failure to 

appear at the status conference either in person or telephonically, may result in an order imposing 

an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110 and 183.

Dated: March 24, 2014

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.consent\snell2178.ossc.docx

Case 2:13-cv-02178-DAD Document 20 Filed 03/25/14 Page 2 of 2