Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00165/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00165-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT RAFFAELLY and

CHARLES SCHNEPP,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-06-0165 FCD DAD PS

vs.

SISKIYOU COUNTY BOARD OF

SUPERVISORS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On September 15, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Defendant filed

objections to the findings and recommendations and plaintiffs have filed a reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:06-cv-00165-FCD-DAD Document 85 Filed 10/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 15, 2006, are adopted in

full; and

2. Defendant County of Siskiyou’s motion for attorney’s fees is denied.

DATED:October 4, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00165-FCD-DAD Document 85 Filed 10/04/06 Page 2 of 2