Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00310/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00310-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING 

U.S. District Court – Eastern District of California 

Case No. CV 00310-GEB-DAD 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB#159747 

DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ. CSB#236458 

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL 

925 West Hedding Street 

San José, California 95126 

T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0203 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

JOHN & CASSANDRA SPRINGER, individually and as 

Guardian Ad Litem for their minor 

Children Cameron S. and Christian S. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SACRAMENTO DIVISION) 

JOHN & CASSANDRA SPRINGER, ) Case Number: 2:06 CV-00310-GEB-DAD 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER 

 ) CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION 

vs. ) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

 ) 

COUNTY OF PLACER, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

The parties hereto, in consultation with their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate and 

agree as follows, and request this court order same; 

1. The hearing on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment currently scheduled 

for May 14th, 2007, be rescheduled to May 29th, 2007, at 9:00 a.m., the dispositive 

motion hearing deadline of May 14th, 2007, notwithstanding. 

2. The briefing deadlines associated are extended accordingly. 

// 

// 

// 

Case 2:06-cv-00310-GEB-DAD Document 49 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING 

U.S. District Court – Eastern District of California 

Case No. CV 00310-GEB-DAD 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

________/S/___________ 4/ /07 ________/S/__________ 4/ /07 

DAVID HUSKEY, Esq. ROBERT POWELL, Esq. 

Attorney for Defendants Attorney for Plaintiffs 

ORDER 

 Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, the court hereby adopts the proposed 

stipulation as an order of this court.1

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: April 25, 2007 

 

1

 Since the parties stipulate to this modification, and the modification can be made in a manner that will not 

adversely affect the Court’s docket, the good cause issue will not be reached. 

Case 2:06-cv-00310-GEB-DAD Document 49 Filed 04/26/07 Page 2 of 2