Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04113/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04113-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 460
Nature of Suit: Deportation
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUHAMMAD YOUNAS MALIK,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C-07-4113 MMC

AMENDED * 

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR

ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

Before the Court is applicant Larry P. James’ (“James”) application, filed August 9,

2007, to appear pro hac vice on behalf of the above-named plaintiff. In his application,

James lists his business address as 1207 Front Street, Suite 22, Sacramento, California. 

The Civil Local Rules of this district provide that an applicant who resides in California is

ineligible to practice pro hac vice, unless he has resided in California for less than one year,

has completed all required applications for admission to the State Bar of California, and has

officially registered to take or is awaiting the results of the California State Bar examination. 

See Civil L.R. 11-3 (b). 

As James did not indicate in his application whether he falls within said exception, 

__________________

* The sole amendment is to replace, in the final sentence, the phrase “the action is

hereby REMOVED from the electronic case filing program,” with the phrase “the Clerk and

any opposing counsel shall serve plaintiff by mail.”

Case 3:07-cv-04113-MMC Document 7 Filed 10/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the Court afforded James the opportunity to file a supplement to his application, no later

than September 28, 2007, to state that he qualifies for the exception. As James has failed

to file a supplement to his application, or otherwise demonstrate he so qualifies, the

application is hereby DENIED. 

As plaintiff has no counsel of record, the Clerk and any opposing counsel shall serve

plaintiff by mail.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-04113-MMC Document 7 Filed 10/12/07 Page 2 of 2