Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05891/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05891-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAURICIO MONTANO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

G. GALAZA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-05891-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

(Document #57)

Plaintiff, Mauricio Montano (“Plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 27, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that recommended Defendants’ motion to dismiss be

granted and the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a

claim. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the

parties and contained notice to the parties that any objections

to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed by July 9,

2007. Because the Magistrate Judge was recommending dismissal

Case 1:03-cv-05891-AWI-DLB Document 61 Filed 08/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

with leave to amend, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended

complaint by July 9, 2007. No party has filed objections.

Plaintiff has also not filed an amended complaint. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review

of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by

the record and by proper analysis. Because Plaintiff was already

given notice of the complaint’s pleading deficiencies and an

opportunity to amend, the court’s dismissal will be without leave

to amend.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 27, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED; 

3. This action is DISMISSED without leave to amend;

4. All pending motions are DENIED as moot; and

5. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this

action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05891-AWI-DLB Document 61 Filed 08/06/07 Page 2 of 2