Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01186/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01186-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RENE ARROYO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

D. ADAMS et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:11-cv-01186-AWI-DLB (PC)

ORDER VACATING STAY

[ECF No. 56]

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

OPPOSITION

Plaintiff Rene Arroyo (“Plaintiff”) is a former prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff is proceeding on his original complaint, filed, July 

19, 2011.

Pursuant to the Court’s March 5, 2012, order, this action is proceeding on the following 

cognizable claims: (1) violation of the Fourth Amendment against Defendant Adams; (2) 

violation of the Fourteenth Amendment against Defendant Adams; (3) violation of the Eighth 

Amendment base on the use of excessive force against Defendants Schneider, Carter, Matthews 

and Leon; (4) violation of the Eighth Amendment based on conditions of confinement against 

Defendants Hubach, Matthews and Leon; (5) violation of the right to privacy under the 

California Constitution against Defendant Adams; (6) unreasonable search in violation of Article 

I, Section 13 of the California Constitution against Defendant Adams; and (7) use of excessive 

Case 1:11-cv-01186-AWI-DLB Document 63 Filed 10/29/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

force in violation of Article I, Section 17 of the California Constitution against Defendants 

Schneider, Carter, Matthews and Leon. 

On September 20, 2013, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff did 

not file an opposition. 

On September 30, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for stay of summary judgment 

proceedings. On January 10, 2014, the Court issued an order staying proceedings on 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment pending resolution of discovery matters. It appears 

that discovery disputes have now been resolved. Therefore, the stay of proceedings on 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is VACATED. Plaintiff is advised that he must file 

an opposition to the motion for summary judgment within twenty-one (21) days from the date of 

service of this order, or the Court will consider the motion unopposed. In the event Plaintiff files 

an opposition, Defendants may file a reply within seven (7) days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 29, 2014 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01186-AWI-DLB Document 63 Filed 10/29/14 Page 2 of 2