Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00629/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00629-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANUEL A. BLANCO,

Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-0629 FCD KJN P

vs.

SACRAMENTO SHERIFF, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed April 29, 2009, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On May 5, 2009, plaintiff sought a ninety-day

extension of time to file an amended complaint. On May 12, 2009, plaintiff was granted an

additional thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. On May 29, 2009, plaintiff sought

another sixty days in which to amend. By order filed June 11, 2009, plaintiff was granted an

additional thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. On June 11, 2009, plaintiff signed

a second request for a sixty day extension of time, which crossed in the mail with the court’s

June 11, 2009 order.

More than sixty days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended

complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s June 11, 2009 order.

/////

Case 2:09-cv-00629-FCD-KJN Document 16 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 12, 2010

 /s/ Kendall J. Newman 

 KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

blan0629.fta

Case 2:09-cv-00629-FCD-KJN Document 16 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 2