Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01447/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01447-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM B. CORLEY, No. CIV.S-03-1447 LKK DAD PS

Plaintiff,

ORDER SETTING STATUS

v. (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

GRAY DAVIS, Governor of the 

State of California, et al.,

Defendant.

__________________________/

This action has been assigned to United States District

Judge Lawrence K. Karlton and, pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21),

has been referred to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for all purposes

encompassed by that provision. 

Pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 16, as amended, effective December 1, 1993, IT IS ORDERED:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for

June 24, 2005, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 27, before Magistrate

Judge Drozd.

Case 2:03-cv-01447-LKK -DAD Document 52 Filed 04/22/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. All parties shall appear at the Status Conference by

counsel, or in person if acting without counsel. Parties may appear

at the conference telephonically. To arrange telephonic appearance,

parties shall contact Pete Buzo, the courtroom deputy of the

undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128.

3. The parties shall submit to the court, no later than

seven days before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, a

status report addressing the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Any expected or desired amendment of

the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling

thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the

scheduling thereof, including

disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including setting

appropriate cut-off dates for discovery

and law and motion, and the scheduling

of a final pretrial conference and

trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial

procedures specified by the rules due

to the relative simplicity or

complexity of the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any

other case, including matters in

bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to

the magistrate judge assigned to this

matter acting as settlement judge,

Case 2:03-cv-01447-LKK -DAD Document 52 Filed 04/22/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

waiving any disqualifications by virtue

of his so acting, or whether they

prefer to have a Settlement Conference

before another judge; 

k. Any other matters that may add to the

just and expeditious disposition of

this action; and

l. Whether the parties intend to consent

to proceed before a United States

Magistrate Judge.

DATED: April 21, 2005.

DAD:lg:th

DDad1\orders.prose\corley1447.ossc(2)

Case 2:03-cv-01447-LKK -DAD Document 52 Filed 04/22/05 Page 3 of 3