Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04307/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04307-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY TOTTEN, JOSE MORENO, in their

capacities as Trustees of the

LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA;

LABORERS VACATION-HOLIDAY TRUST

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA;

LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; and LABORERS

TRAINING AND RETRAINING TRUST FUND

FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ALEX PEGUES, individually; ROGER

PITCHER, individually; ALEX PEGUES

and ROGER PITCHER, individually and

dba C&C MAINTENANCE SERVICE and C&C

MAINTENANCE SERVICE, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-05-4307-SC

ORDER EXTENDING TIME

FOR FILING AN

OPPOSITION AND REPLY

Plaintiffs Larry Totten et al. ("Plaintiffs") filed this

action against Defendants Alex Pegues, both individually and dba

C&C Maintenance Service ("Defendants"), alleging causes of action

Case 3:05-cv-04307-SC Document 37 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The Employee Retirement Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et

seq.

2

 Plaintiffs dismissed Roger Pitcher as a defendant. See

Docket Nos. 15 and 16. 

-2-

for ERISA1 violations.2 

 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion for summary

judgment. Defendants have not filed an opposition, though they

were served with a copy of the motion and given adequate time to

respond to it.

In the interest of justice, the Court GRANTS Defendants

thirty days from the date of this Order to file a motion opposing

Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs will have ten

days from the date Defendants file their opposition to file a

reply brief. 

The trial date of September 11, 2006 is hereby VACATED. The

Court, if necessary, will set a new trial date at the appropriate

time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 24, 2006

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:05-cv-04307-SC Document 37 Filed 08/24/06 Page 2 of 2