Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05382/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05382-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 368
Nature of Suit: Asbestos Personal Injury - Prod.liab.
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY FLOYD,

Plaintiff,

v.

FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY 

CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-05382-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 3/18/16

Fact discovery cut-off 12/9/16

Expert disclosures 11/14/16

Expert rebuttal 12/2/16

Expert discovery cut-off 1/13/17

Deadline to file dispositive motions 1/18/17

Pretrial conference statement due 3/7/2017

Pretrial conference 3/17/2017 at 2:00 

p.m. in Oakland

Case 3:15-cv-05382-JST Document 118 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Trial

3/27/2017 at 8:30 

a.m. in San 

Francisco

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 4, 2016

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-05382-JST Document 118 Filed 03/04/16 Page 2 of 2