Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04027/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04027-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTORIA ROGER-VASSELIN,

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL,

INC., et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C04-4027 TEH 

ORDER SETTING NEW TRIAL

AND PRETRIAL DATES AND

VACATING JUNE 26, 2006

CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

The Court is in receipt of the parties’ joint case management statement filed on

June 22, 2006, in which the parties propose a September 26, 2006 trial date. The parties

represent that this trial date will allow them time to continue attempting to finalize a

settlement agreement while also providing sufficient time to prepare for trial if the case

ultimately does not settle. In accord with the parties’ joint statement, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Trial in this action, if it does not settle, shall begin on September 26, 2006, at

8:30 AM. If necessary, this case may trail a case set to begin trial before this Court on

September 12, 2006. The Court will further advise the parties of this possibility at the

pretrial conference.

2. The pretrial dates shall be adjusted based on the new trial date. Thus, the

following deadlines shall apply:

a. August 11, 2006: Deadline for lead counsel who will try the case to begin

meeting and conferring about the preparation of the joint pretrial conference

statement.

Case 3:04-cv-04027-TEH Document 120 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

b. September 1, 2006: Joint pretrial conference statement, proposed jury

instructions, proposed special verdict form (if any), and proposed voir dire (if

any) due.

c. September 5, 2006: Motions in limine due.

d. September 11, 2006, at 3:00 PM: Pretrial conference held.

e. September 12, 2006: Oppositions to motions in limine due.

f. September 19, 2006: Objections to separately proposed jury instructions and

special verdict form (if any) due. Exhibits to be lodged.

The parties are reminded that these are firm dates, and, absent any unforeseen circumstances,

the Court does not anticipate granting a second continuance of the trial date.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the June 26, 2006 case management conference is

VACATED. This order resolves the issues that the Court intended to discuss at the case

management conference, and the parties therefore need not make an appearance. If the

parties believe it would be useful to meet with the Court at any time prior to the pretrial

conference, they shall call the Court’s courtroom deputy to request a further case

management conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 06/23/06 

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:04-cv-04027-TEH Document 120 Filed 06/23/06 Page 2 of 2