Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02169/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02169-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERRIS EDGERLY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

DAVID GOFF, JOHN CONEFREY,

FREDERICK SCHIFF, AND DOES 1 TO 20,

Defendants. /

No. C 03-02169 WHA

ORDER REGARDING

SUBMISSIONS FOR FINAL

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

For the final pretrial conference, counsel shall prepare a fresh and completely updated

joint submission. Do not rely on what was filed several years ago. The proposed jury

instructions, for example, must incorporate the Ninth Circuit’s current view of the law on each

claim to be tried as well as a correct view of all other aspects of law that will be tried. Counsel

must meet and confer in person (not by letter or over the phone) to try to reach an agreement on

the jury instructions as well as all other parts of the joint submission.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 13, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-02169-CRB Document 219 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 1