Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-06714/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-06714-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:2 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

JUDGMENT 

CASE NUMBER: C 11-06714-YGR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

IN RE APPLE IPHONE ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION 

CASE NO. C 11-06714-YGR 

Related Case Nos. C 07-05152-JW 

 C 12-05404-YGR 

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

 

Case 4:11-cv-06714-YGR Document 129 Filed 01/07/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

JUDGMENT 

CASE NUMBER: C 11-06714-YGR

For the reasons set forth in the Court’s December 2, 2012 Order the Court granted, with 

prejudice, Apple’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 

12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 124.) 

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT Plaintiffs’ Second Amended 

Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and the Court enters judgment as follows: Plaintiffs shall 

take nothing from this action and Defendant Apple Inc. shall have judgment in its favor on 

Plaintiffs’ entire action. The parties shall bear their own costs. 

Dated: _____________________ 

 

 THE HONORABLE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 

 United States District Court Judge 

 SF\5682190 

Case 4:11-cv-06714-YGR Document 129 Filed 01/07/14 Page 2 of 2