Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00966/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00966-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1355 Petition for Return of Property

---

STIPULATION UNDER LOCAL RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME

Case No. CV10-00966 JF

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Robert J. Kent, CAB #250905; 

rjkent@fr.com 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 

Redwood City, CA 94063 

Telephone: (650) 839-5070 

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 

Attorney for Defendant 

EXERGEN CORPORATION 

Kathryn G. Spelman, CAB #154512; 

kspelman@mount.com 

Daniel H. Fingerman, CAB #229683; 

dfingerman@mount.com

MOUNT & STOELKER, PC 

River Park Tower, Suite 1650 

333 W. San Carlos Sreet 

San Jose, CA 95110 

Telephone: (408) 279-7000 

Facsimile: (408) 998-1473 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN JOSE DIVISION) 

SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE GLAD PRODUCTS COMPANY, BAJER 

DESIGN & MARKETING INC., BAYER 

CORPORATION, BRIGHT IMAGE 

CORPORATION, CHURCH & DWIGHT CO. 

INC., COLGAGE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, 

COMBE INCORPORATED, THE DIAL 

CORPORATION, EXERGEN CORPORATION, 

GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, HI-TECH 

PHARMACAL CO. INC., JOHNSON 

PRODUCTS COMPANY INC., MAYBELLINE 

LLC, MCNEIL-PPC INC., MEDTECH 

PRODUCTS INC., PLAYTEX PRODUCTS 

INC., RECKITT BENCKISER INC., ROCHE 

DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION, 

SOFTSHEEN-CARSON LLC, SUN 

PRODUCTS CORPORATION, SUNSTART 

AMERICAS INC., 

Defendants.

Case No. CV10-00966 JF 

STIPULATION UNDER LOCAL RULES 6-

1 AND 6-2 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SHORTENING TIME 

**E-Filed 6/29/2010**

------------------ ------------------

Case 5:10-cv-00966-JF Document 273 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 5
STIPULATION UNDER LOCAL RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME

Case No. CV10-00966 JF

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant Exergen Corporation (“Exergen”) and Plaintiff San Francisco Technology, Inc. 

(“SF Tech”) through their respective counsel, hereby make the following stipulation: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff SF Tech filed its complaint (D.I. 1) on March 5, 2010 (“the 

Complaint”); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff SF Tech served the Summons and Complaint on Exergen via U.S. 

Mail on June 15, 2010 (Kent Decl., ¶3); 

WHEREAS, Exergen received the Summons and Complaint on June 18, 2010 (Kent Decl., 

¶4); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to CCP § 415.40 (applicable pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(A) 

and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1)) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i), the deadline for Exergen to move 

or plead in response to the Complaint is July 21, 2010; 

WHEREAS, Exergen intends to file a pre-answer motion pursuant, inter alia, to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 12(b); 

WHEREAS, certain other defendants have filed pre-answer motions; 

WHEREAS, on May 18, 2010, the Clerk in this matter posted a notice (D.I. 186) setting a 

conference on July 8, 2010 to hear the defendants’ motions to dismiss, motions to stay, and 

motions to sever; and 

WHEREAS, the parties believe that the interests of judicial efficiency favor hearing 

Exergen’s motion on July 8, 2010, together with the pre-answer motions of Exergen’s codefendants, 

NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE THAT: 

Defendant Exergen shall file any motion to dismiss, motion to stay, or motion to sever no 

later than June 30, 2010; 

Plaintiff SF Tech shall file its opposition to Exergen’s motion, if necessary, no later than 

July 7, 2010; and 

Any such motion shall be heard during the July 8, 2010 hearing currently scheduled in this 

case. 

/// 

Case 5:10-cv-00966-JF Document 273 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 5
STIPULATION UNDER LOCAL RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME

Case No. CV10-00966 JF

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: June 24, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ Robert J. Kent

 Robert J. Kent 

Attorney for Defendant 

EXERGEN CORPORATION

Dated: June 24, 2010 MOUNT & STOELKER, PC 

By: /s/ Robert J. Kent on behalf of 

Daniel H. Fingerman

 Daniel H. Fingerman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.

DECLARATION 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Daniel 

Fingerman. 

Dated: June 24, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ Robert Kent

 Robert J. Kent 

Attorney for Defendant 

EXERGEN CORPORATION

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

///

Case 5:10-cv-00966-JF Document 273 Filed 06/29/10 Page 3 of 5
STIPULATION UNDER LOCAL RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME

Case No. CV10-00966 JF

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________ 

THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL 

United States District Court Judge 

50720060.doc 

6/29/2010

Case 5:10-cv-00966-JF Document 273 Filed 06/29/10 Page 4 of 5
STIPULATION UNDER LOCAL RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME

Case No. CV10-00966 JF

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on June 24, 2010, all counsel of record who are 

deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of the 

STIPULATION UNDER LOCAL RULES 6-1 AND 6-2 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SHORTENING TIME via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule 5-4 and General Order 

45. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail. 

/s/ Robert J. Kent 

Robert J. Kent 

50720060.doc 

Case 5:10-cv-00966-JF Document 273 Filed 06/29/10 Page 5 of 5