Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-02360/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-02360-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDDIE YOUNG,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S- 01-2360 LKK GGH P

vs.

R. MANDEVILLE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On November 4, 2005, plaintiff filed “objections” to an order, which the court

will construe as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed October 13,

2005, denying the plaintiff’s July 27, 2005 motion to compel discovery. Pursuant to E.D. Local

Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary

to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate

judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed October 13, 2005, is affirmed. 

DATED: January 10, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/youn2360.850

Case 2:01-cv-02360-LKK -KJN Document 54 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 1