Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05998/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05998-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on December 26, 2006, as 1

undeliverable. However, plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice,

service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN KING,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CAPTAIN SEDELY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05998-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 8)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, John King (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On November 20, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:04-cv-05998-AWI-DLB Document 10 Filed 04/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 20,

2006, are ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on plaintiff’s failure

to obey the court’s order of October 5, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 11, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05998-AWI-DLB Document 10 Filed 04/11/07 Page 2 of 2