Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00543/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00543-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONICA TREVINO, CASE NO. CV F 06-0543-LJO- NEW 

Plaintiffs, ORDER SETTING MANDATORY STATUS

vs. CONFERENCE

SEARS ROEBUCK, INC. AND DOES

1 THROUGH 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

 /

On June 7,2007, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed

(Doc. 33) based on Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure to file a stipulation of dismissal following the Notice of

Settlement (Doc. 32). Plaintiff’s counsel was previously sanctioned $1500 in this case on May 4, 2007

for failure to prosecute (Doc. 29). In that order, this Court admonished Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel

to comply with all deadlines in this case and noticed that “[f]ailure to do so will result in further

sanctions, including the probability of dismissal.” Order Denying Motion to Dismiss; Order Granting

Sanctions, p.5 n.2 (May 5, 2007). In response to the Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Juan

Falcon, responded with the following: “There is no legal cause why the case should not be dismissed.”

Declaration Re Order to Show Cause for Dismissal, ¶ 3 (July 12, 2007). It now appears that Defense

Counsel objects to the dismissal. Having read and reviewed all filed documents, the Court orders as

follows: Counsel are ORDERED to appear for a status conference Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at

9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4 (LJO). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 13, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00543-LJO -LJO Document 35 Filed 07/13/07 Page 1 of 1