Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06523/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06523-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID E. PALISMO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

L. BUCKNER, 

Defendant. 

 /

1:04-cv-06523-AWI-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 3)

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION

David E. Palismo (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding

pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On March 14, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that recommended this action be dismissed for

failure to state a claim. The Findings and Recommendations were

served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to

the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty

(30) days. On April 21, 2006, Plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations. On May 1, 2006,

Case 1:04-cv-06523-AWI-LJO Document 6 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

based on the information contained in the objections, the

Magistrate Judge granted Plaintiff permission to amend this

complaint to cure the deficiencies noted in the Findings and

Recommendations within thirty (30) days. To date, Plaintiff has

failed to comply with or otherwise respond to this order.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis. The

allegations in the complaint do not a state a claim for a

violation of the Eighth Amendment.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed March 14, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06523-AWI-LJO Document 6 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2