Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02141/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02141-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH CAPOGRECO, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-00-1951 LKK GGH P

vs.

R. SANDHAM, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On September 8, 2005, defendants filed a request for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order, filed September 2, 2005, vacating defendants’ motions for partial

summary judgment as to plaintiff Johnson, renoticed on October 13, 2004 and October 21, 2004,

and ordering that an evidentiary hearing be set to determine whether plaintiff is being deprived of

access to legal materials relevant to this case. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a

magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon

review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling

was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:05-cv-02141-LKK -GGH Document 151 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed September 2, 2005, is affirmed. 

DATED: September 16, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/john1951.850

Case 2:05-cv-02141-LKK -GGH Document 151 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 2