Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00474/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00474-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRO, SEIZURE, AND OSC

Case No. 16-cv-00474

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JAMES G. GILLILAND JR. (State Bar No. 107988)

RYAN T. BRICKER (State Bar No. 269100)

ALLISON K. HARMS (State Bar No. 299214)

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

Eighth Floor, Two Embarcadero Center

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 576-0200

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300

E-Mail: jgilliland@kilpatricktownsend.com

rbricker@kilpatricktownsend.com

aharms@kilpatricktownsend.com

JOSEPH E. PETERSEN (State Bar No. 304597)

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

1080 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, California 94025

Telephone: (650) 326-2400

Facsimile: (650) 326-2422

E-Mail: jpetersen@kilpatricktownsend.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

NFL PROPERTIES LLC, PANTHERS FOOTBALL, LLC D/B/A CAROLINA PANTHERS,

and PDB SPORTS, LTD. D/B/A DENVER BRONCOS FOOTBALL CLUB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

NFL PROPERTIES LLC, PANTHERS 

FOOTBALL, LLC D/B/A CAROLINA 

PANTHERS, and PDB SPORTS, LTD. D/B/A 

DENVER BRONCOS FOOTBALL CLUB,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-00474

DOCUMENT FILED UNDER SEAL

PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. § 1116

[PROPOSED] TEMPORARY 

RESTRAINING ORDER, SEIZURE 

ORDER, AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Case 3:16-cv-00474-CRB Document 13 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 11
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRO, SEIZURE, AND OSC

Case No. 16-cv-00474 - 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The request of Plaintiffs NFL Properties LLC (“NFLP”), Panthers Football, LLC d/b/a 

Carolina Panthers (the “Carolina Panthers”), and PDB Sports, Ltd. d/b/a Denver Broncos Football 

Club (the “Denver Broncos”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) for an Ex Parte Temporary 

Restraining Order, Seizure Order for unlicensed merchandise and tickets bearing trademarks 

owned by Plaintiffs, and Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction, was filed on 

Wednesday, January 27, 2016, and heard by this Court on Friday, January 29, 2016; and

This Court having reviewed the Verified Complaint, the exhibits thereto, and the 

accompanying affidavits of Anastasia Danias, Senior Vice President and Chief Litigation Officer 

for the National Football League (the “NFL”) and Assistant Secretary of NFLP; Heather 

Holdridge, an experienced private investigator licensed in California; Wayne Grooms, an 

experienced private investigator who has participated in the execution of seizure orders at the past 

twenty Super Bowl games; Todd D. Schoenberger, Special Agent for the United States 

Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), Homeland 

Security Investigations (“HSI”), assigned to the San Jose Field Office, within the Area of 

Responsibility of the Office of the Special Agent in Charge, San Francisco; Richard Bailey, 

Financial Crimes Detective with the Santa Clara Police Department; Jose A. Martinez, Detective 

Police Officer with the San Jose Police Department; and Joseph Petersen, Esq.; and other papers 

filed, hereby finds:

1. Plaintiffs have demonstrated that they are entitled to injunctive relief by establishing that they are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims, that they will suffer irreparable 

harm, that the balance of equities decidedly tips in their favor, and that the requested relief is in 

the public interest.

2. Plaintiffs have shown a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits of their 

claims that Defendants have used counterfeit and infringing marks in connection with the production, offering for sale, distribution, or sale of items, in violation of the rights of Plaintiffs under the 

Lanham Act and under the laws of the State of California.

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:16-cv-00474-CRB Document 13 Filed 02/02/16 Page 2 of 11
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRO, SEIZURE, AND OSC

Case No. 16-cv-00474 - 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. The Carolina Panthers and the Denver Broncos will compete in the Super Bowl 

championship game, scheduled to be played on Sunday, February 7, 2016, at Levi’s® Stadium in 

Santa Clara, California.

4. Before, during, and after the Super Bowl game, numerous related events will take 

place in the counties of Santa Clara, San Francisco, Alameda, and San Mateo (collectively “Bay 

Area Counties”).

5. The Super Bowl 50 game has received intense media coverage and Plaintiffs’ trademarks, including those of NFLP, the Carolina Panthers, the Denver Broncos, and the other NFL 

Member Clubs (as defined in Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint), have received extensive exposure in 

the Bay Area Counties.

6. Plaintiffs have adopted and used in commerce certain trademarks that are widely 

recognized by the public, including, but not limited to: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, 

NFL, the NFL Shield Design (including both current and earlier versions), SUPER BOWL, 50, the 

SUPER BOWL 50 Design, SUPER SUNDAY, ON THE FIFTY, VINCE LOMBARDI TROPHY, 

the VINCE LOMBARDI TROPHY Design, AMERICAN FOOTBALL CONFERENCE, AFC, 

the AFC Design (including both current and earlier versions), the AFC Champion Trophy Design, 

NATIONAL FOOTBALL CONFERENCE, NFC, the NFC Design, the NFC Champion Trophy 

Design, NFL EXPERIENCE, BACK TO FOOTBALL, the BACK TO FOOTBALL Design, 

TOGETHER WE MAKE FOOTBALL, NFL NETWORK, the NFL NETWORK Design, NFL 

ON LOCATION, NFL SHOP, NFL TICKET EXCHANGE, ON FIELD, PRO BOWL, SUNDAY 

NIGHT FOOTBALL, MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL, TASTE OF THE NFL, CAROLINA 

PANTHERS, PANTHERS, BELONG, TWO STATES. ONE TEAM., KEEP POUNDING, the 

PANTHERS Design, the PANTHERS Stylized Design, the CAROLINA PANTHERS Uniform 

Designs, DENVER BRONCOS, BRONCOS, BRONCOS COUNTRY, MILE HIGH MAGIC, 

MILES, ORANGE SUNDAY, ORANGE CRUSH, the BRONCOS Designs, the D & Horse 

Design, the Football Player On Bronco Design, the BRONCOS Horse Riding Design, the 

BRONCOS Twisting Horse Design, the Twisting Horse Design, the BRONCOS Mascot Design, 

the DENVER BRONCOS Uniform Designs, and the DENVER BRONCOS Helmet Designs 

Case 3:16-cv-00474-CRB Document 13 Filed 02/02/16 Page 3 of 11
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRO, SEIZURE, AND OSC

Case No. 16-cv-00474 - 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(including both current and historic versions), among others (collectively along with the other 

NFLP, NFL, and Member Club word and design trademarks herein, the “NFL Trademarks”).

7. Plaintiffs have registered certain of their NFL Trademarks with the United States 

Patent and Trademark Office and/or with California Secretary of State.

8. Plaintiff NFLP, a wholly owned subsidiary of NFL Ventures, L.P., which is an 

affiliate under common control with the NFL, owns all of the NFL’s trademarks, names, logos, 

symbols, slogans, and other identifying marks and indicia (both registered and unregistered) and is 

responsible for licensing and protecting the same. NFLP is also the authorized representative of 

the NFL’s 32 Member Clubs, including the Carolina Panthers and the Denver Broncos with 

respect to the licensing and protection of their trademarks, names, logos, symbols, slogans, and 

other identifying marks and indicia. Thus, NFLP has authority to license the use of the NFL 

Trademarks on tickets and on a wide variety of goods, including apparel such as t-shirts, garments 

and hats, souvenir items such as pennants, novelty items and games, and many other products, and 

NFLP has licensed third parties to use said trademarks on such merchandise under strict quality 

control standards.

9. Defendants are not licensed or authorized by NFLP to use the NFL Trademarks on 

merchandise or to manufacture, issue, and/or sell tickets for the Super Bowl 50 game.

10. Defendants are and/or will be in the Bay Area Counties between 12:00 p.m. 

on Thursday, February 4, 2016, and Monday, February 8, 2016, at 5:00 p.m., for the purpose 

of manufacturing, distributing, offering for sale, selling, and advertising unauthorized sales of 

unlicensed, counterfeit souvenir merchandise (“Counterfeit Merchandise”) and unlicensed, 

unredeemable counterfeit tickets (“Counterfeit Tickets”) bearing the NFL Trademarks.

11. Defendants’ unlawful activities are likely to cause public confusion, mistake, or 

deception, causing immediate and irreparable harm to Plaintiffs.

12. Plaintiffs will incur immediate and irreparable injury and have no adequate remedy 

at law if this Court declines to grant an injunction.

13. Unless the requested order is granted, Plaintiffs will have no adequate remedy at 

law and will suffer immediate and irreparable harm in the form of infringement of the Plaintiffs’ 

Case 3:16-cv-00474-CRB Document 13 Filed 02/02/16 Page 4 of 11
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRO, SEIZURE, AND OSC

Case No. 16-cv-00474 - 4 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

trademarks, injury to reputation and property rights, and decreased sales of licensed merchandise 

before, during, and/or after the Super Bowl 50 game caused by unauthorized sales of Counterfeit 

Merchandise and Counterfeit Tickets.

14. An order other than an ex parte seizure order is not adequate to achieve the 

purposes of 15 U.S.C. § 1114.

15. Should this Court decline to grant Plaintiffs’ application, the harm to Plaintiffs 

clearly outweighs any harm which Defendants may incur, because Defendants have no legitimate 

rights to use the NFL Trademarks in connection with Counterfeit Merchandise and Counterfeit 

Tickets or otherwise, Defendants have not requested permission from Plaintiffs to use the NFL 

Trademarks, and Plaintiffs have not consented to such use.

16. This Court believes that it is in the public interest that Counterfeit Merchandise, 

Counterfeit Tickets, and otherwise infringing merchandise be removed from sale to unsuspecting 

consumers.

17. Plaintiffs have shown that notice need not be given of this Order because a 

temporary restraining order on notice to the Defendants would be inadequate to protect the 

Plaintiffs’ interests. If notified of an impending injunctive order, Defendants are likely to retain 

the Counterfeit Merchandise and Counterfeit Tickets by hiding, transferring to their cohorts, or 

destroying the Counterfeit Merchandise and Counterfeit Tickets.

18. Plaintiffs also have shown that notice need not be given of this Order because 

Defendants—the vendors and manufacturers of the Counterfeit Merchandise and Counterfeit 

Tickets (and their cohorts)—have no business identities before or after the Super Bowl 50 week 

and cannot be identified, located, or notified of the request for the temporary restraining order and 

order of delivery, seizure, and impoundment.

19. Plaintiffs have indicated their willingness and ability to provide a $75,000 bond 

to the Court in conjunction with the requested Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order and Seizure 

Order.

20. The entry of an Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order and Seizure Order will 

serve to adequately achieve the objectives underlying the federal trademark law of the United 

Case 3:16-cv-00474-CRB Document 13 Filed 02/02/16 Page 5 of 11
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRO, SEIZURE, AND OSC

Case No. 16-cv-00474 - 5 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

States of America and the statutory and common law trademark and unfair competition laws of 

the State of California.

21. The matter subject to said Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order and Seizure 

Order will be located in the Bay Area Counties.

22. Plaintiffs have not publicized that they are seeking the relief requested in the 

requested Order.

23. Plaintiffs, via their outside counsel, by letter dated January 15, 2016, have notified 

the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California of their intention to file this 

action and seek an Ex Parte Order pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d).

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Application for an Ex Parte

Temporary Restraining Order, Seizure Order, and Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction 

is hereby granted; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants, their officers, members, directors, agents, servants, 

employees, confederates, representatives, and all persons acting in concert or participation with 

them, are hereby enjoined and restrained from:

(a) Manufacturing, distributing, offering for sale, selling, and/or advertising any 

articles of merchandise or tickets bearing the trademarks of NFLP, NFL and the Member Clubs, or 

reproductions thereof, including, but not limited to the following:

● NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE;

● NFL;

● the NFL Shield Designs (including both current and earlier versions), as depicted 

on Exhibit 1 hereto;

● SUPER BOWL;

● 50;

● the Super Bowl 50 Design (National), as depicted on Exhibit 1 hereto;

● the Super Bowl 50 Design (Regional), as depicted on Exhibit 1 hereto;

● SUPER SUNDAY;

● ON THE FIFTY;

Case 3:16-cv-00474-CRB Document 13 Filed 02/02/16 Page 6 of 11
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRO, SEIZURE, AND OSC

Case No. 16-cv-00474 - 6 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

● VINCE LOMBARDI TROPHY;

● the VINCE LOMBARDI TROPHY Design, as depicted on Exhibit 1 hereto;

● AMERICAN FOOTBALL CONFERENCE;

● AFC;

● the AFC Design (including both current and earlier versions), as depicted on 

Exhibit 1 hereto;

● the AFC Champion Trophy Design, as depicted on Exhibit 1 hereto;

● NATIONAL FOOTBALL CONFERENCE;

● NFC;

● the NFC Design (including both current and earlier versions), as depicted on 

Exhibit 1 hereto;

● the NFC Champion Trophy Design, as depicted on Exhibit 1 hereto;

● NFL EXPERIENCE;

● NFL NETWORK;

● NFL NETWORK Design;

● NFL ON LOCATION;

● NFL SHOP;

● NFL TICKET EXCHANGE;

● ON FIELD;

● BACK TO FOOTBALL;

● BACK TO FOOTBALL Design;

● SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL;

● MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL;

● TOGETHER WE MAKE FOOTBALL;

● PRO BOWL;

● TASTE OF THE NFL;

 CAROLINA PANTHERS; PANTHERS; BELONG; TWO 

STATES. ONE TEAM.; KEEP POUNDING; the PANTHERS 

Case 3:16-cv-00474-CRB Document 13 Filed 02/02/16 Page 7 of 11
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRO, SEIZURE, AND OSC

Case No. 16-cv-00474 - 7 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Design, as depicted on Exhibit 2 hereto; the PANTHERS Stylized 

Design, as depicted on Exhibit 2 hereto;

 DENVER BRONCOS; BRONCOS; BRONCOS COUNTRY; MILE 

HIGH MAGIC; MILES; ORANGE SUNDAY; ORANGE CRUSH;

the BRONCOS Designs, as depicted on Exhibit 2 hereto; the D & 

Horse Design, as depicted on Exhibit 2 hereto; the Football Player 

On Bronco Design, as depicted on Exhibit 2 hereto; the BRONCOS 

Horse Riding Design, as depicted on Exhibit 2 hereto; the 

BRONCOS Twisting Horse Design, as depicted on Exhibit 2 hereto; 

the Twisting Horse Design, as depicted on Exhibit 2 hereto; the 

BRONCOS Mascot Design, as depicted on Exhibit 2 hereto;

 the CAROLINA PANTHERS Uniform Designs, as depicted on 

Exhibit 2 hereto;

 the DENVER BRONCOS Uniform Designs, as depicted on Exhibit 

2 hereto; the DENVER BRONCOS Helmet Designs (both current 

and historic), as depicted on Exhibit 2 hereto; and

 the full team names, logos, and related marks of any Member 

Club of the National Football League (including, but not limited to, 

the Carolina Panthers and the Denver Broncos); or

(b) Representing that any articles of merchandise or tickets manufactured, distributed, 

offered for sale, or sold or advertised by Defendants are sponsored or licensed or are authorized by 

or originate with NFLP, the NFL, or any of the Members Clubs including the Carolina Panthers 

and the Denver Broncos, or from otherwise taking any action likely to cause confusion, mistake,

or deception on the part of the public as to the origin or sponsorship of such goods or tickets, 

unless such articles of merchandise have been licensed by Plaintiffs; or from taking any actions 

infringing any of Plaintiffs’ trademark or other property rights, or from assisting, aiding, or 

abetting any other person or entity in engaging in or performing any of the activities referred to 

herein; and it is further

ORDERED that an on-duty agent from the Department of Homeland Security and/or other 

duly authorized law enforcement officer(s) from the Santa Clara, San Jose, and, as available, other 

Bay Area Counties’ Police Departments, are hereby authorized to take delivery by way of a 

seizure and impoundment pursuant to this Order, and to deliver to Plaintiffs any and all 

Counterfeit Merchandise or Counterfeit Tickets which Defendants attempt to manufacture or sell, 

or are holding for sale, or are maintaining in their warehouse or other places of business, or any 

devices used to produce or reproduce such Counterfeit Merchandise or Counterfeit Tickets,

Case 3:16-cv-00474-CRB Document 13 Filed 02/02/16 Page 8 of 11
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRO, SEIZURE, AND OSC

Case No. 16-cv-00474 - 8 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

including, without limitation, silk screens, molds, printers, matrices, or heat transfers, in the 

possession, custody, or control of Defendants, pending further orders of this Court, and that the 

delivery, seizure, and impoundment shall take place at all locations within the Bay Area Counties 

where Counterfeit Merchandise and/or Counterfeit Tickets are sold, offered for sale, distributed, 

transported, manufactured, and/or stored; and it is further

ORDERED that the Seizure Order described in the preceding paragraph is effective 

beginning at 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 4, 2016, and shall remain in effect through and 

including Monday, February 8, 2016, at 5:00 p.m., or as extended by further Order of the Court; 

and it is further

ORDERED that service on named Defendants may be made by personal service of a 

Summons, together with a copy of the Verified Complaint, without exhibits, and a copy of this 

Order; and each unnamed Defendant shall be served with a copy of the Verified Complaint, without exhibits, and a copy of this Order at any time during the pendency of the Order, specifically 

including, without limitation, Sunday, February 7, 2016 (the day of the Super Bowl 50 game), by 

an agent from the Department of Homeland Security, or other appropriate law enforcement officer 

having jurisdiction in the locale in which the Counterfeit Merchandise or Counterfeit Tickets are 

located, and NFLP’s duly authorized representative private investigators, Heather Holdridge and 

Wayne Grooms, or any trained person acting under their supervision, direction, and control, with 

proof of service to be filed in these proceedings. Such service shall make the person or entity 

served an additional Defendant to this case. The Court makes clear, however, that service of this 

Order must be made by an on-duty federal, state or local law enforcement officer as specified in 

p.7 above, and the service of this Order must be made before any delivery, seizure, or

impoundment is executed pursuant to this Order. Defendants may contact Joseph E. Petersen of 

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, 1080 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, 

telephone (650) 326-2400, or Ryan Bricker of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Eighth 

Floor, Two Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, California 94111, telephone (415) 576-0200, 

during any weekday from the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., to obtain a complete set of motion 

papers and affidavits without charge; and it is further

Case 3:16-cv-00474-CRB Document 13 Filed 02/02/16 Page 9 of 11
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRO, SEIZURE, AND OSC

Case No. 16-cv-00474 - 9 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDERED that if it is ascertained that Counterfeit Merchandise or Counterfeit Tickets are 

present, all persons empowered to execute this Order are permitted to take physical custody of the 

Counterfeit Merchandise or Counterfeit Tickets through reasonable means to effectuate and 

accomplish the Order herein. Persons executing said Order are authorized to obtain samples, 

photographs, and other evidence of infringing goods and the circumstances of the sale or 

distribution of said goods; and it is further

ORDERED that a written receipt for any merchandise or ticket seized shall be given to 

the person from whom the goods are taken. Such seized items shall be kept in suitable containers 

identified with the receipts given, shall be kept safely in the custody and control of the Plaintiffs, 

and shall be made available to the Court at any hearing to confirm or challenge a seizure; and it is 

further

ORDERED that, as a condition to the effectiveness of the restraining aspects of this Order, 

Plaintiffs shall post a bond in a form satisfactory to the Clerk in the amount of $75,000.00, 

securing Defendants against their costs and damages if it is found that they have been wrongfully 

restrained. Said security is to be filed within seventy-two (72) hours of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants shall cooperate with the appropriate law enforcement officials 

executing this Order, and shall provide the items sought to be seized from wherever such items are 

maintained; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants are hereby required to provide the persons executing this 

Order with correct names, residential and business addresses, and telephone numbers; and it is 

further

ORDERED that items seized from any Defendant shall be disposed of by Plaintiffs upon 

further Order of this Court by destroying it, donating it to charity, or making such other disposition as appears appropriate; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants shall show cause on the 12th day of February 2016 at 

2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, in Courtroom 6 of the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 17th Floor, San 

Francisco, California 94102, why an order should not issue preliminarily enjoining Defendants 

Case 3:16-cv-00474-CRB Document 13 Filed 02/02/16 Page 10 of 11
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TRO, SEIZURE, AND OSC

Case No. 16-cv-00474 - 10 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

from the acts temporarily restrained herein at pp. 5-7, and confirming the seizure order authorized 

herein; and at said hearing proof may be adduced by the Verified Complaint and declarations, or 

by proof as in ordinary basis; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants’ answering papers, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this 

Court and served upon the attorneys for Plaintiffs by delivering copies thereof to the offices of 

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Eighth Floor, 1080 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 

94025, Attention: Joseph E. Petersen, before 5:00 p.m. on February 8th, 2016. Any reply shall be 

filed and served by Plaintiffs by 5:00 p.m. on February 10, 2016; and it is further

ORDERED that this action shall remain sealed by the Court until further Order from this 

Court; and it is finally

ORDERED that this Order shall remain in effect until further Order of the Court.

Defendants are hereby given notice that failure to attend the hearing scheduled herein 

may result in confirmation of the seizure authorized herein, destruction or other disposition of the 

goods seized, if any, immediate issuance of the requested-for Preliminary Injunction to take effect 

immediately upon expiration or dissolution of the Temporary Restraining Order, and shall otherwise extend for the pendency of this litigation relief upon the same terms and conditions as comprise this Temporary Restraining Order. Defendants are hereby given further notice they shall 

be deemed to have actual notice of the issuance and terms of such Preliminary Injunction and any 

act by them or any one of them in violation of any of the terms thereof may be considered and 

prosecuted as contempt of this Court.

SIGNED this 2nd day of February, 2016, at 9:55 a.m.

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

7838327V.1

Case 3:16-cv-00474-CRB Document 13 Filed 02/02/16 Page 11 of 11