Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00105/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00105-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KEVIN CURLEY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RAJA DUTTA, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:17-cv-0105 WBS AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed February 14, 2020, this case was referred to the Post-Screening 

ADR Project for an early settlement conference and plaintiff was directed to notify the court 

whether he wanted to participate in the settlement conference in person or by video conference, if 

available. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff has now returned the required notice, but instead of checking 

one option or the other, he has checked both. ECF No. 30. Plaintiff will be given one more 

chance to notify the court how he would like to attend in the settlement conference. He must 

select either (1) in person or (2) by video, not both. If plaintiff returns the form and once again 

checks both choices, the court will order him to appear at the settlement conference in person. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the service of this 

order, plaintiff must complete and return the attached notice telling the court how he wants to 

appear at the settlement conference. If plaintiff does not return the completed notice, or if he 

Case 2:17-cv-00105-WBS-AC Document 32 Filed 03/04/20 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

once again selects both options, the court will issue a writ for plaintiff to appear in person. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: March 3, 2020 

Case 2:17-cv-00105-WBS-AC Document 32 Filed 03/04/20 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KEVIN CURLEY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RAJA DUTTA, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:17-cv-0105 WBS AC P 

NOTICE RE: PLAINTIFF’S APPEARANCE 

AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (POSTSCREENING ADR PROJECT) 

As required by court order, the plaintiff notifies the court of the following election: 

 

_____ Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference in person. 

OR

_____ Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference by video conference, if 

available. 

DATED: 

 ________________________________ 

 Plaintiff 

 

Case 2:17-cv-00105-WBS-AC Document 32 Filed 03/04/20 Page 3 of 3