Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01614/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01614-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSE ACOSTA v. REYNA TAMEZ, et al.

Second Stipulation For Extension of Time 1 Case No. 1:16-cv-01614

Bruce A. Neilson #096952

7108 N. Fresno St. #410

Fresno, California 93720

Telephone (559) 432-9831

Facsimile (559) 432-1837

Attorney for Defendants

Reyna Tamez, Jose Nino, John 

Bettencourt and Debby Bettencourt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

* * * * *

JOSE ACOSTA,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

REYNA TAMEZ dba AL’S RICOS TACOS

aka AL RICOS TACOS; JOSE NINO dba

AL’S RICOS TACOS aka AL RICOS

TACOS; JOHN BETTENCOURT; DEBBY

BETTENCOURT;

 Defendants.

 _ _______________ _

))))))

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:16-cv-01614-DAD-EPG

SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ALL 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT

WHEREAS:

1. Plaintiff JOSE ACOSTA filed his complaint in this action on October 25, 2016.

2. This is the second request for an extension of time for REYNA TAMEZ dba AL’S RICOS 

TACOS aka AL RICOS TACOS, JOSE NINO dba AL’S RICOS TACOS aka AL RICOS

TACOS, JOHN BETTENCOURT and DEBBY BETTENCOURT (“Defendants”). A previous 

stipulation for extension of time was granted by local rule and therefore court approval is required 

for a further extension of time. A joint status report is due on or about January 24, 2017.

3. Plaintiff and Defendants continue to be in settlement negotiations at this time, but time is 

needed to review a now completed CASp report and conclude the terms of a settlement.

4. The parties agree and submit that settlement of this case prior to the preparation of a joint status 

report would save valuable court time and resources.

Case 1:16-cv-01614-DAD-EPG Document 10 Filed 12/20/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSE ACOSTA v. REYNA TAMEZ, et al.

Second Stipulation For Extension of Time 2 Case No. 1:16-cv-01614

5. The parties have agreed to extend Defendants’ time to respond to the complaint until January 

23, 2017, subject to the court's approval, and believe that the case can be settled within that time. 

NOW THEREFORE, Defendants through their attorneys, and Plaintiff JOSE ACOSTA

through his attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for REYNA TAMEZ dba AL’S 

RICOS TACOS aka AL RICOS TACOS, JOSE NINO dba AL’S RICOS TACOS aka AL RICOS

TACOS, JOHN BETTENCOURT and DEBBY BETTENCOURT to answer or otherwise respond 

to the Complaint shall be extended up to and including January 23, 2017, pending court approval.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

Dated: December 19, 2016 /s/Tanya E. Moore

 Tanya E. Moore, Attorney for Plaintiff Jose Acosta

Dated: December 19, 2016 /s/Bruce A. Neilson 

Bruce A. Neilson, Attorney for Defendants, 

Reyna Tamez, Jose Nino, John Bettencourt and 

Debby Bettencourt

Case 1:16-cv-01614-DAD-EPG Document 10 Filed 12/20/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSE ACOSTA v. REYNA TAMEZ, et al.

Second Stipulation For Extension of Time 3 Case No. 1:16-cv-01614

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that defendants REYNA TAMEZ dba AL’S RICOS TACOS aka AL 

RICOS TACOS, JOSE NINO dba AL’S RICOS TACOS aka AL RICOS TACOS, JOHN 

BETTENCOURT and DEBBY BETTENCOURT shall have until January 23, 2017 to answer or 

otherwise respond to the Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 20, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01614-DAD-EPG Document 10 Filed 12/20/16 Page 3 of 3