Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01475/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01475-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1 CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-01475-MEJ

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE 

813036.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROSALIND G. JONES,

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 

COMPANY AS TRUSTEE OF ARGENT 

SECURITIES INC., ASSET-BACKED PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-M2, a 

National Association; OCWEN LOAN 

SERVICING, LLC, a Limited Liability Company; 

ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN, CLAIMING ANY 

LEGAL OR EQUITABLE RIGHT, TITLE, 

ESTATE, LIEN OR INTEREST IN THE 

PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE COMPLAINT 

ADVERSE TO PLAINTIFF’S TITLE, OR ANY 

CLOUD ON PLAINTIFF’S TITLE THERETO; 

and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 3:16-cv-01475-MEJ

Hon. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James 

Ctrm. B 

[Unlimited Jurisdiction] 

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO 

DISMISS COMPLAINT WITH 

PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL 

RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

Hearing: [No Hearing Required] 

The Court having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint With Prejudice Pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (the “Stipulation”) entered into by and between 

defendants Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee of 

Argent Securities Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-M2 (“Defendants”) and 

plaintiff Rosalind Jones (“Plaintiff”), and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation is APPROVED.

Case 3:16-cv-01475-MEJ Document 20 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2
 2 CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-01475-MEJ

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE 

813036.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future hearing dates in this action are hereby vacated. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of 

enforcing the terms of the separate settlement agreement entered into between the parties. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________________ _________________________________ 

HON. MARIA-ELENA JAMES 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

December 27, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-01475-MEJ Document 20 Filed 12/27/16 Page 2 of 2