Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03851/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03851-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPLUATION RE CONTINUING CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. C 05 3851 PJH

sf-2153107

MICHAEL J. AGOGLIA (CA SBN 154810)

STUART C. PLUNKETT (CA SBN 187971)

RITA F. LIN (CA SBN 236220)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

E-mail: magoglia@mofo.com

Attorneys for Defendant

PMI MORTGAGE INSURANCE CO. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHELLE HOGAN, DAVID HOGAN, KAY 

CARTWRIGHT, and WILLIAM 

CARTWRIGHT, on Behalf of Themselves and 

All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PMI MORTGAGE INSURANCE CO., Defendant.

Case No. C 05 3851 PJH

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING

MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULE 

FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING

Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:05-cv-03851-PJH Document 62 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPLUATION RE CONTINUING CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. C 05 3851 PJH

sf-2153107

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, plaintiffs Michelle Hogan, David Hogan, Kay Cartwright, 

and William Cartwright and defendant PMI Mortgage Insurance Company, through their 

respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The parties request that the Court continue the deadlines for class certification 

discovery and briefing to allow the parties an opportunity to conduct a mediation. 2. The parties have agreed to mediate this matter before the Honorable Edward 

Infante (Ret.) on July 28, 2006. The parties wish to avoid having to incur the costs of discovery 

and preparation of class certification briefing pending the outcome of the mediation.

3. Pursuant to the Court’s February 3, 2006 order, the current deadlines are as 

follows:

The last day for discovery relating to class certification is July 19, 2006. The last day for plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is August 16, 2006. The last day for defendant’s opposition to class certification is September 13, 

2006. The last day for plaintiffs’ reply to defendants’ opposition to class certification is 

September 27, 2006.

The motion for class certification is scheduled for October 18, 2006, at 9:00 a.m.

4. The parties request that the Court continue those deadlines as follows to allow the 

parties to focus its/his and her resources on the July 28, 2006 mediation:

The last day for discovery relating to class certification will be September 1, 2006.

The last day for plaintiffs’ motion for class certification will be September 27, 2006.

The last day for defendant’s opposition to class certification will be October 25, 2006.

The last day for plaintiffs’ reply to defendants’ opposition to class certification 

will be November 8, 2006.

The motion for class certification will be scheduled for hearing on November 29, 2006, at 9:00 a.m.

Case 4:05-cv-03851-PJH Document 62 Filed 07/10/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPLUATION RE CONTINUING CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case No. C 05 3851 PJH

sf-2153107

2

Dated: July 5, 2006 MICHAEL J. AGOGLIA

STUART C. PLUNKETT

RITA F. LIN

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Michael J. Agoglia

Attorneys for Defendant

PMI MORTGAGE INSURANCE 

CO.

Dated: June 28, 2006 STEPHEN L. MEAGHER

JAMES HOYER NEWCOMER & 

SMILJANICH, P.A.

DOUGLAS BOWDOIN, P.A. By: /s/ Tamra Givens

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MICHELLE HOGAN, DAVID 

HOGAN, KAY CARTWRIGHT, and 

WILLIAM CARTWRIGHT

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________, 2006

____________________________________ The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Judge

RULE 45 ATTESTATION

In accordance with General Order 45, concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from each of the other signatories and I shall maintain records to support this 

concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request 

by a party.

 _____/s/ Michael Agoglia _____

 Attorney for Defendant

July 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:05-cv-03851-PJH Document 62 Filed 07/10/06 Page 3 of 3