Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00801/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00801-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

B.O.L.T., an unincorporated 

association of motorcycle 

riders and enthusiasts;

MARK TEMPLE, an individual;

LAWRENCE “WOLF” HAVEN, an

individual; WARREN PEARL; an

individual; LYLE DUVAUCHELLE, 

an individual; GLENN OSBORN, 

an individual; JEFFREY RABE, 

an individual; WILLIAM 

LANGHORNE, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MICHAEL GOOLD, in his 

official capacity as Chief of 

Police of the CITY OF RANCHO 

CORDOVA; SCOTT R. JONES, in 

his official capacity as the

SHERIFF of COUNTY OF 

SACRAMENTO,

Defendants.

BRETT PETERSON, D.D.S.; 

B.O.L.T., an unincorporated 

association of motorcycle 

riders and enthusiasts; JOHN 

DALKE, an individual; MARK 

TEMPLE, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOSEPH A. FARROW, 

Commissioner California 

Highway Patrol; MICHAEL 

GOOLD, in his official 

No. 2:14-cv-01588-GEB-DAD

RELATED CASE ORDER

No. 2:15-cv-00801-JAM-KJN

Case 2:15-cv-00801-JAM-DB Document 10 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

capacity as Chief of Police 

of the City of Rancho 

Cordova; SCOTT R. JONES, in 

his official capacity as the 

Sheriff of County of 

Sacramento; ROBERT DIMICELI 

a.k.a. ROBERT DI MICELI, 

Officer of the California 

Highway Patrol; STEPHEN 

CARROZZO, Rancho Cordova 

police officer and Deputy 

Sheriff; KAMALA HARRIS, in 

her official capacity as 

California Attorney General,

 Defendants.

Plaintiffs filed a “Notice of Related Cases” in which 

they state: “[the above-entitled] actions involve similar 

questions of fact and the same question of law and their 

assignment to the same Judge or Magistrate Judge is likely to 

effect a substantial savings of judicial effort, either because 

the same result should follow in both actions or otherwise.” 

(Pls.’ Notice Related Cases 1:22-25, ECF No. 35.)

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that 

they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123. Under the 

regular practice of this Court, related cases are generally 

assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to whom the first 

filed action was assigned. Therefore, action 2:15-cv-00801 is 

reassigned to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge 

Dale A. Drozd for all further proceedings, and any date currently 

set in the reassigned case is VACATED. Henceforth the caption on 

documents filed in the reassigned case shall show the initials 

“GEB-DAD.” 

Case 2:15-cv-00801-JAM-DB Document 10 Filed 07/28/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Further, a Status Conference is scheduled in action 

2:15-cv-00801 before the undersigned judge on October 26, 2015,

at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be filed no later than 

fourteen (14) days prior.1

The Clerk of the Court shall make appropriate 

adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for 

this reassignment.

Dated: July 28, 2015

 

1 The failure of one or more of the parties to participate in the 

preparation of the Joint Status Report does not excuse the other parties from 

their obligation to timely file a status report in accordance with this Order. 

In the event a party fails to participate as ordered, the party timely 

submitting the status report shall include a declaration explaining why it was 

unable to obtain the cooperation of the other party or parties.

Case 2:15-cv-00801-JAM-DB Document 10 Filed 07/28/15 Page 3 of 3