Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01154/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01154-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HUGO ALBERTO GARCIA-OROZCO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-CV-01154 LJO DLB HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #6]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241. 

On January 17, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for failure to obey a court order.

Specifically, Petitioner did not submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing

fee as ordered. It is further noted that Petitioner’s mail has been repeatedly returned by the U.S.

Postal Service as undeliverable since September 15, 2006. This Findings and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation

were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have

Case 1:06-cv-01154-LJO-DLB Document 9 Filed 03/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued January 17, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; 

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01154-LJO-DLB Document 9 Filed 03/12/07 Page 2 of 2