Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05895/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05895-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 03-5895 CRB 1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

JONATHAN L. WOLFF

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

JAY C. RUSSELL, State Bar No. 122626

Deputy Attorney General

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000

San Francisco, CA 94102-7004

Telephone: (415) 703-5717

Fax: (415) 703-5843

email: Jay.Russell@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendants Krings and Speed

Kate Dyer, State Bar Number 171891

Jodi Linker, State Bar Number 230273

CLARENCE & DYER LLP

899 Ellis Street

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: (415) 749-1800

Facsimile: (415) 749-1694

emails: kdyer@clarencedyer.com

jlinker@clarencedyer.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Carlos Miranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CARLOS MIRANDA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

 Defendants.

________________________________________

Case No.: 03-CV-05895 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER 

The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby jointly propose and stipulate as

follows. 

Case 3:03-cv-05895-CRB Document 41 Filed 10/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 03-5895 CRB 2

WHEREAS, on June 23, 2006, the Court held a Case Management Conference, at which the

Court granted plaintiff’s request to conduct discovery regarding the issue of qualified immunity; 

WHEREAS, defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgement that relates primarily to the

issue of qualified immunity; 

WHEREAS, the parties are now in a dispute over the qualified immunity discovery;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that they should attempt to resolve this dispute prior to any

involvement by the Court or further briefing by the parties;

WHEREAS, the parties anticipate that they will be able to resolve this dispute without the

Court’s intervention if provided sufficient time;

THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties through their undersigned counsel,

that the date of hearing of Defendant Krings and Speed’s Motion for Summary Judgment presently

scheduled for November 3, 2006 shall be continued pending resolution of the current discovery dispute. 

The parties further stipulate that they will work diligently together to attempt to resolve the current

discovery dispute. If the parties jointly resolve their discovery dispute, they will jointly file a proposed

briefing schedule with the Court for defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. If the parties are

unable to resolve their discovery dispute jointly, they will file promptly any appropriate motions with

the Court for resolution and/or referral to a Magistrate Judge. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 6, 2006 By: /s/: Jodi Linker

Jodi Linker

Clarence & Dyer LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff Carlos Miranda 

Dated: October 6, 2006 By: /s/: Jay Russell 

Jay C. Russell

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants Speed and Krings

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer

United States District Court 

October 10, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:03-cv-05895-CRB Document 41 Filed 10/11/06 Page 2 of 2