Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01132/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01132-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

The Estate of Mario Madrigal, Jr., et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

City of Mesa, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CV 05-1132 PHX NVW

ORDER

The court has received the plaintiffs' and defendants' respective statements of

discovery dispute. The statements together show that counsel have not personally

conferred concerning the dispute and that they do not certify that they have reached an

impasse. If counsel comply with the directives in the court's case management order,

posted on the court's website, and submit a joint statement in compliance with them, the

court will promptly set a telephone hearing. The court sees no reason why those

directives cannot be complied with in one or two days.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the court will not set a hearing on the

discovery dispute at this time. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel promptly comply with the following

directives:

The parties shall not file written discovery motions without leave of court. If a

discovery dispute arises in the course of a deposition and an immediate ruling of the court

Case 2:05-cv-01132-NVW Document 15 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

is necessary, the parties shall jointly telephone the court to request a telephone conference

concerning the dispute. If any other discovery dispute arises, the parties shall submit (1)

a brief written summary of the dispute, not to exceed one page, with explanation of the

position taken by each party and (2) a written certification that the counsel or the parties

have attempted to resolve the matter through personal consultation and sincere effort as

required by LRCiv 7.2(j) and have reached an impasse. If the opposing party has refused

to personally consult, the party seeking relief shall describe the efforts made to obtain

personal consultation. Counsel or the parties may then telephone the court to obtain a

time for a telephone conference, and the court may enter appropriate orders on the basis

of the telephone conference. The court may order written briefing if it does not resolve

the dispute during the telephone conference. Any briefing ordered by the court shall also

comply with LRCiv 7.2(j).

DATED this 25th day of October, 2005.

 

Case 2:05-cv-01132-NVW Document 15 Filed 10/25/05 Page 2 of 2