Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00549/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00549-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

George L. Mothershed, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

State of Oklahoma et al, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 12-549-PHX-FJM

ORDER

The court has before it plaintiff's "Motion to Amend Findings and Conclusions of

Law(Verified)" (doc. 43). But Rule 52(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. applies to the amendment of

Findings and Conclusions made under Rule 52(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. Such Findings and

Conclusions are made, for example, in actions tried to the court without a jury. We made no

findings and conclusions under Rule 52(a). Instead, we granted a motion to dismiss. Thus,

there are no findings to amend. Accordingly, it is ORDERED DENYING plaintiff's Motion

to Amend Findings and Conclusions. (Doc. 43).

We have already denied plaintiff's Motion to amend the judgment and Motion for

reconsideration. (Doc. 42). Plaintiff's remedy, if any, is to seek further review in the United

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

DATED this 19th day of July, 2012.

Case 2:12-cv-00549-FJM Document 44 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 1