Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01585/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01585-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK L. PAYNE, No. 04-cv-01585-MCE-KJM P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

G. STRATTON, Warden, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 23, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. On

September 10, 2007, plaintiff filed a document which the court construes as objections to the

findings and recommendations.

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01585-MCE -KJM Document 54 Filed 09/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 23, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. The January 26, 2007 motion to dismiss filed by defendants Sogge and

Williams is granted in part and denied in part as follows:

a. Granted with respect to plaintiff’s claims based on the First, Fifth

and Fourteenth Amendments; and

b. Denied with respect to plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims.

3. Defendant Sogge and Williams shall file their answer within twenty days.

Dated: September 20, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01585-MCE -KJM Document 54 Filed 09/20/07 Page 2 of 2