Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-00757/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-00757-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

QUIN DENVIR, Bar No. 49374

Federal Defender

ALLISON CLAIRE, Bar No. 170138

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 498-5700

Attorney for Petitioner

JAY STEWART MILLER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAY STEWART MILLER,

Petitioner,

v.

CAL TERHUNE, et al.,

Respondents.

_______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CIV S-00-0757 LKK GGH P

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING

DEADLINE FOR PETITIONER'S CLOSING

POST-HEARING BRIEF

Petitioner, JAY STEWART MILLER, and respondents, CAL TERHUNE,

et al., by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and

stipulate as follows:

1. Pursuant to prior stipulation and order, petitioner’s

closing post-hearing brief is now due on August 29, 2005. For the

reasons which follow, petitioner requests a final 30-day extension of

the deadline. Respondent has no objection.

2. In mid-June, 2005, counsel for petitioner accepted a new

job in the Capital Habeas Unit of the Federal Defender’s Office. She

remains counsel of record in several non-capital cases, including this

one. 

Case 2:00-cv-00757-LKK -GGH Document 85 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Miller v. Terhune final EOT 2

3. At the time the parties in this case entered the

previous stipulation regarding scheduling, counsel for petitioner was

assigned to a single capital case (Majors v. Brown, CIV 99-0493 MCE PAN

P). Since the previous scheduling order was issued, counsel has been

assigned to a second capital case (Bolin v. Brown, CIV 99-5279 REC DP). 

Both involve extensive records and pressing deadlines.

4. Counsel for petitioner is scheduled to attend a capital

habeas training conference, the National Habeas Seminar, in Pittsburgh,

Pennsylvania, from August 24, 2005, through August 28, 2005.

5. For these reasons, despite the exercise of reasonable

diligence, counsel for petitioner is unable to complete the closing

brief by August 29, 2005. Counsel is eager to submit the case for

decision, and is confident that the brief can be completed by September

28, 2005.

6. Counsel for respondent has no objection to a final 30-

day extension of time.

7. Counsel for respondent has authorized counsel for

petitioner to sign this stipulation on his behalf.

Dated: August 17, 2005

Respectfully submitted,

QUIN DENVIR

Federal Defender

/s/ Allison Claire 

ALLISON CLAIRE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Petitioner

JAY STEWART MILLER

Case 2:00-cv-00757-LKK -GGH Document 85 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Miller v. Terhune final EOT 3

Dated: August 17, 2005 BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of 

California

/s/ Clifford E. Zall 

CLIFFORD E. ZALL 

Deputy Attorney General

Attorney for Respondents

O R D E R

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and for good cause

shown, petitioner's closing post-hearing brief shall be filed no later

than September 28, 2005. The case will then be submitted for

preparation of Findings and Recommendations.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 8/30/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

___________________________

HON. GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

United States Magistrate Judge

mil757.eot

Case 2:00-cv-00757-LKK -GGH Document 85 Filed 08/30/05 Page 3 of 3