Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02649/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02649-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARY A. JASSO, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS

COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, INC.,

et al.,

Defendants.

CIV. S-05-2649 GEB PAN PS

ORDER 

-o0oPlaintiffs, who proceed in pro se, seek permission to file

their papers electronically. E. D. Cal. L. R. 5-133(b)(2). 

Plaintiffs assert they “live over 5 hours away and filing in

person is impossible and the mail takes quite a long time to get

papers from here to the court to be filed.” Plaintiffs have

nonetheless timely filed multiple briefs on all pending matters. 

Moreover, most of plaintiffs’ briefs exceed 25 pages in length,

with attachments or exhibits in excess of 50 pages, thus

Case 2:05-cv-02649-GEB-EFB Document 65 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

triggering the requirement that courtesy copies be delivered to

chambers within one business day even if the originals were efiled. E. D. Cal. L. R. 5-133(b)(2). 

As plaintiffs have presented no compelling reason to deviate

from the general rule requiring pro se litigants to file their

documents in person or by mail, plaintiffs’ request is denied.

So ordered.

Dated: February 9, 2006. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02649-GEB-EFB Document 65 Filed 02/10/06 Page 2 of 2