Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-05273/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-05273-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C-02-5273 ORDER Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LEXAR MEDIA, INC,

Defendants.

And Related Case C-03-0167 MJJ

________________________________/

No. C 02-5273 MJJ (JL)

ORDER

All discovery in this case has been referred by the district court (Hon. Martin J.

Jenkins) as provided by 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and Civil Local Rule 72. Before the Court are

the following discovery motions in the two related cases, with docket numbers:

C-02-5273 MJJ (JL),Toshiba v Lexar, Discovery Dispute between Lexar and nonparty SanDisk (286);

C-02-5273 MJJ (JL),Toshiba v Lexar, Discovery Dispute between Lexar and Toshiba

re compliance with Court’s previous orders (288);

C-02-5273 MJJ (JL), Toshiba v Lexar, SanDisk motion to quash Lexar subpoena or

for protective order (311);

C-03-0167 MJJ (JL), Toshiba v Lexar, Joint Letter re 3 discovery disputes (108);

Case 3:02-cv-05273-MJJ Document 316 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C-02-5273 ORDER Page 2 of 2

C-03-0167 MJJ (JL), Toshiba v. Lexar, Defendant’s motion to compel non-party

Hynix to produce documents (110);

The Court hereby orders all counsel involved with any of these motions to meet and

confer in person and provide to the Court a statement on the status of their disputes no

less than one week prior to the hearing on these motions, which the Court is now

scheduling for August 16, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate

Avenue.

The statement shall include who attended the meet and confer session or sessions,

what discovery issues they discussed and what proposed solutions they offered and to

which of these the parties were able to agree. Finally the parties and non-parties shall

advise the Court which, if any, of these disputes remain for resolution by the Court at the

hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 26, 2006

__________________________________

JAMES LARSON

Chief Magistrate Judge

Case 3:02-cv-05273-MJJ Document 316 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2