Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01510/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01510-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL JOSEPH SPRAITZ, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1510 GEB CMK P

vs.

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR MEN, 

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.

§1983, and has requested authority to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This

proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 72-302 by the authority of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1).

By order filed July 31, 2006, the court dismissed plaintiff’s claims with leave to

amend the complaint within thirty days. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. On

September 26, 2006, the court filed findings and recommendations recommending that this

action be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint. On

October 6, 2006, plaintiff filed objections. By order filed October 19, 2006, the court vacated

the September 26, 2006 findings and recommendations and granted plaintiff thirty days to file an

///

Case 2:06-cv-01510-GEB-CMK Document 10 Filed 12/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

amended complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an

amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s complaint be

dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Martinez

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 12, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01510-GEB-CMK Document 10 Filed 12/12/06 Page 2 of 2