Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02799/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02799-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANNY JAMES COHEA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-00-2799 FCD EFB P

vs.

CHERYL K. PLILER, Warden, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 13, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On

March 31, 2009, this court adopted the findings and recommendations. 

However, on March 30, 2009, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and

recommendations which were not docketed by the Clerk prior to issuance of the March 31 order. 

Accordingly, the March 31, 2009 order adopting the findings and recommendations is vacated. 

///

Case 2:00-cv-02799-GEB-EFB Document 177 Filed 04/07/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Nonetheless, after reviewing the file and plaintiff’s objections, the court again

finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate

judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 13, 2009, are adopted in full; 

2. Defendants’ December 20, 2007 motion to dismiss the claims against

defendants Flory, Hill, Kelly, Rosario, Saunders, Scogin, Sims and White, is GRANTED;

3. Plaintiff’s January 14, 2008 motion for reconsideration, filed with his brief in

opposition to the motion to dismiss, is DENIED; 

4. Plaintiff’s December 28, 2007 motion for a temporary restraining order is

DENIED; and

5. Plaintiff’s February 11, 2008 and February 25, 2008 requests are DENIED. 

DATED: April 6, 2009.

Case 2:00-cv-02799-GEB-EFB Document 177 Filed 04/07/09 Page 2 of 2