Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01869/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01869-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIE MAE THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant.

No. 2:13-cv-1869-MCE-EFB PS

ORDER

On March 3, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 3, 2015, are ADOPTED; 

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 12, is granted;

3. Plaintiff’s claims for violation of the 2009 and 2012 collective bargaining agreements

are dismissed without leave to amend;

4. Plaintiff’s claims for violation of the 2006 for failure to pay a $100 monthly benefit

credit are dismissed without leave to amend;

Case 2:13-cv-01869-MCE-EFB Document 19 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

5. Any other claim for violation of the 2006 agreement are dismissed with leave to 

amend; and

6. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file a first 

amended compliant as provided herein. The first amended complaint must bear the docket 

number assigned to this case and must be labeled “First Amended Complaint.” Failure to timely 

file an amended complaint will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for 

failure to prosecution under Rule 41(b).

Dated: March 27, 2015

Case 2:13-cv-01869-MCE-EFB Document 19 Filed 03/30/15 Page 2 of 2