Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01986/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01986-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Rodney R. Latham-Brown, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Trident Security Services, Inc., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-10-1986-PHX-GMS

ORDER

On November 2, 2010, Defendant Trident Security Services Incorporated filed a

Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and A.R.S. §12-

541(5). (Doc. 8). Arizona Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(c) provides that an opposing

party to a motion to dismiss “shall, unless otherwise ordered by the Court . . ., have fourteen

(14) days after service” in a civil case within which to serve and file a responsive

memorandum in opposition to the motion. Therefore, accounting for mailing time, Plaintiff’s

responsive memorandum was due no later than November 19, 2010. As of the date of this

Order, however, Plaintiff neither has filed a response nor has requested to receive an

extension of time. 

Under the Local Rules, Plaintiffs’ failure to “serve and file the required answering

memoranda . . . may be deemed a consent to the . . . granting of the motion [to dismiss]” and

the Court may dispose of the motion summarily. Local R. Civ. P. 7.2(i).

/ / /

Case 2:10-cv-01986-GMS Document 10 Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file and serve an answering

memorandum to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss before 5:00 p.m. on December 10, 2010.

Should Plaintiff fail to comply, the Court may deem his failure to oppose the Motion as a

waiver, and may dismiss the complaint.

DATED this 29th day of November, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-01986-GMS Document 10 Filed 11/29/10 Page 2 of 2