Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-86/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO.,

LTD.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MEDIATEK, INC., et al.,

Defendants 

MEDIATEK, INC,

Counterclaimant,

 v.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO.,

LTD., et al.

Counterclaim Defendants /

No. C 05-3148 MMC

VACATING ORDER DENYING

DEFERRED PORTION OF PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE

RELIEF TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER

SEAL; GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFERRED

PORTION OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF;

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

By order filed April 25, 2007, the Court deferring ruling on plaintiff’s administrative

motion to file under seal certain documents offered in support of plaintiff’s opposition to

defendants’ motion for summary judgment, to the extent said motion pertains to documents

assertedly designated as confidential by non-party Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”). 

Now before the Court is the Declaration of Brian G. Bodine, filed May 4, 2007, submitted in

support of plaintiff’s administrative motion.

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1058 Filed 05/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Having reviewed the Declaration of Brian G. Bodine, the Court hereby GRANTS in

part and DENIES in part the deferred portion of plaintiff’s administrative motion, as follows:

1. Microsoft having shown good cause exists to file under seal Exhibits 3 and 18 to

the Declaration of Bradley W. Dickinson in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary

Judgment, plaintiff’s motion is hereby GRANTED to the extent it pertains to said exhibits,

and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file under seal Exhibits 3 and 18.

2. Microsoft having withdrawn its designation of confidentiality as to Exhibit 114 to

the Declaration of Aldo A. Badini in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary

Judgment, (see Bodine Decl. ¶ 8), plaintiff’s motion is hereby DENIED to the extent it

pertains to said exhibit, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Exhibit 114 in the public record.

3. The Order Denying Deferred Portion of Plaintiff’s Motion for Administrative Relief

to File Documents Under Seal, filed earlier this date and which states Microsoft had not

filed a declaration in response to plaintiff’s administrative motion, is hereby VACATED. At

the time the Court issued said order, it had not received a chambers copy of the

declaration, which was not e-filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1058 Filed 05/10/07 Page 2 of 2