Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00974/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00974-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINTE STATEMENT 

Norman Cornejo v. County of Alameda, et al. - Case No.: 3:16-cv-00947-RS; and related actions 

GREGORY B. THOMAS, ESQ. (SBN 239870) 

ADAM A. VUKOVIC, ESQ. (SBN 301392) 

SOPHIA V. COHN, ESQ. (SBN 306661) 

BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 

A Professional Corporation 

555 12th Street, Suite 1800 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Telephone: (510) 834-4350 

Facsimile: (510) 839-1897 

gthomas@bjg.com 

avukovic@bjg.com 

scohn@bjg.com 

Attorneys for Defendant

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, sued herein as “ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,” 

KEVIN BEYRODT, AARON INNS, ANTHONEY FIELDS, IAN STEWART, KAREN 

EASLING, sued herein as “K. EASLING,” and CAMERON TRACY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

YOLANDA FRAUSTO individually and as 

successor in interest to the Estate of Decedent 

John Anthony Cornejo, 

,

 Plaintiffs, 

vs.

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, 

ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, 

KEVIN BEYRODT, NORMAND D. 

CORNEJO, II, and DOES 1 to 30, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

And Related Actions 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 3:16-cv-00974-RS 

And Related Actions 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

BRIEFING AND HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS; OR, IN THE 

ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE 

DEFINTE STATEMENT PURSUANT 

TO L.R. 6-1(a) 

Pursuant to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil 

Local rule 6-1(a), the parties in the above-captioned matter hereby stipulate and agree to amend the 

briefing and hearing schedule on Defendants COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, sued herein as 

“ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,” KEVIN BEYRODT, AARON INNS, 

Case 3:16-cv-00974-RS Document 34 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINTE STATEMENT 

Norman Cornejo v. County of Alameda, et al. - Case No.: 3:16-cv-00947-RS; and related actions 

ANTHONEY FIELDS, IAN STEWART, KAREN EASLING, sued herein as “K. EASLING,” and 

CAMERON TRACY’s (hereinafter “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss, or, in the alternative, 

Motion for a More Definite Statement. 

WHEREAS Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss, or, in the alternative, Motion for a More 

Definite Statement on November 14, 2016, setting the matter for hearing on December 22, 2016. 

WHEREAS the Court set the following briefing schedule: 

x Plaintiff’s Opposition due November 28, 2016; 

x Defendants’ Reply to Opposition due December 5, 2016; 

x Hearing on December 22, 2016. 

WHEREAS the parties, as a matter of professional courtesy, agree to extend the hearing on 

this matter and all remaining briefing deadlines by one week.

WHEREAS the parties hereby stipulate and agreed to the following briefing and hearing 

schedule:

x Plaintiff’s Opposition due December 5, 2016; 

x Defendants’ Reply to Opposition due December 12, 2016; 

x Hearing on December 29, 2016. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: November 21, 2016 

BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 

A Professional Corporation 

By: ___/s/ Gregory B. Thomas 

GREGORY B. THOMAS, ESQ. 

ADAM A. VUKOVIC, ESQ. 

SOPHIA V. COHN, ESQ. 

Attorneys for Defendant 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, sued 

herein as “ALAMEDA COUNTY 

SHERIFF’S OFFICE,” KEVIN 

BEYRODT, AARON INNS, 

ANTHONEY FIELDS, IAN 

STEWART, KAREN EASLING, 

sued herein as “K. EASLING,” and 

CAMERON TRACY 

Case 3:16-cv-00974-RS Document 34 Filed 11/23/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINTE STATEMENT 

Norman Cornejo v. County of Alameda, et al. - Case No.: 3:16-cv-00947-RS; and related actions 

DATED: November 21, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF NIKOLAUS W. REED

By: __/s/ Nikolaus W. Reed_________ 

NIKOLAUS W. REED, ESQ. 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

NORMAN CORNEJO 

DATED: November 21, 2016 QUIRK LAW GROUP, APC 

By: __/s/ Logan Quirk________________ 

LOGAN QUIRK, ESQ. 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

NORMAN CORNEJO 

ATTESTATION 

I, Gregory B. Thomas, am counsel for Record for Defendants County of Alameda, et al. I am 

the registered ECF user whose username and password are being used to file this stipulation. In 

compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the above-identified counsel concurred in 

this filing.

Dated: November 21, 2016 BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 

 By: _/s/ Gregory B. Thomas_______________ 

GREGORY B. THOMAS 

Attorney for Defendants 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, sued herein 

as “ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

OFFICE,” KEVIN BEYRODT, 

AARON INNS, ANTHONEY FIELDS, 

IAN STEWART, KAREN EASLING, 

sued herein as “K. EASLING,” and 

CAMERON TRACY 

Case 3:16-cv-00974-RS Document 34 Filed 11/23/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -4- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINTE STATEMENT 

Norman Cornejo v. County of Alameda, et al. - Case No.: 3:16-cv-00947-RS; and related actions 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: __________, 2016 _________________________________ 

 HON. RICHARD SEEBORG 

 Judge of the United States District Court 

11/23

Case 3:16-cv-00974-RS Document 34 Filed 11/23/16 Page 4 of 4