Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02092/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02092-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 10cv2092

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBIN A. HASSETT,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 10cv2092-LAB (BLM)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

vs. AND RECOMMENDATION

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

Magistrate Judge Major issued a Report and Recommendation in this case

recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be granted and Defendant’s

motion for summary judgment be denied. The Defendant filed no objection to the R&R,

which the Court construes as consent to its adoption. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140–50

(1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a

magistrate’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when

neither party objects to those findings.”). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds that

it thoroughly and correctly considered the issues presented. It adopts the conclusion that

“the case be REMANDED for consideration of whether Plaintiff’s impairments prevent her

from making an adjustment to any other work.” (R&R at 9.) Plaintiff’s motion for summary

//

//

Case 3:10-cv-02092-LAB-BLM Document 21 Filed 11/10/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 10cv2092

judgment is therefore GRANTED, and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is

DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 9, 2011

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-02092-LAB-BLM Document 21 Filed 11/10/11 Page 2 of 2