Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02441/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02441-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACKIE DON WHITE, No. CIV S-06-2441-DFL-CMK-P

Petitioner, 

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

M.C. KRAMER, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is petitioner’s application

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2). Petitioner’s petition will be addressed

separately.

Because petitioner did not submit a “certification from the warden or other

appropriate officer of the place of confinement showing the amount of money or securities that

the petitioner has in any account in the institution” as required by Rule 3(a)(2) of the Federal

Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, on November 9, 2006, the court issued an order providing

petitioner an opportunity to cure this defect, or pay the filing fees. On November 27, 2006,

petitioner paid the fees and, to date, petitioner has not filed a prison trust account statement. It

Case 2:06-cv-02441-JKS-CMK Document 6 Filed 12/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

appears, therefore, that petitioner no longer seeks in forma pauperis status. In any event, the

application currently on file is defective. 

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that petitioner’s motion for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) be denied. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 20 days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive

the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 6, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-02441-JKS-CMK Document 6 Filed 12/07/06 Page 2 of 2