Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00800/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00800-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRED LEON JACKSON, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0800 LKK EFB P

vs.

TERESA S. SCHWARTZ, et al,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in a civil rights action. See 42

U.S.C. 1983. 

On March 20, 2007, the court dismissed plaintiff’s claims against M. Veal, S. Moreno, J.

Bick, N. Khoury and R. Nakamoto for conspiracy to retaliate against him and all claims against

M. Cry, R. Piazza, T. Schwartz, Gomez, Variz and Grannis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, with

leave to amend. The court also dismissed plaintiff’s claims under the Americans with

Disabilities Act (“A.D.A.”) with leave to amend. The court informed plaintiff that he could

proceed on his cognizable claims against M. Veal, J. Bick, N. Khoury and S. Moreno by

submitting materials for service within 20 days, but the court would construe his election so to

proceed as consent to dismissal of his defective claims. 

////

Case 2:05-cv-00800-LKK -EFB Document 48 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On April 5, 2007, plaintiff submitted materials for service of defendants M. Veal, J. Bick,

N. Khoury and S. Moreno.

The court finds plaintiff has consented to dismissal of his A.D.A. claim and his claims

against defendants M. Veal, S. Moreno, J. Bick, N. Khoury and R. Nakamoto for conspiracy to

retaliate against him and all his claims against M. Cry, R. Piazza, T. Schwartz, Gomez, Variz and

Grannis without leave to amend.

Accordingly, it is hereby recommended that plaintiff’s A.D.A. claim and his claims

against defendants M. Veal, S. Moreno, J. Bick, N. Khoury and R. Nakamoto for conspiracy to

retaliate against him and all his claims against M. Cry, R. Piazza, T. Schwartz, Gomez, Variz and

Grannis be dismissed without prejudice. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: April 27, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-00800-LKK -EFB Document 48 Filed 04/27/07 Page 2 of 2