Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01053/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01053-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

READY TRANSPORTATION, INC.; )

AVAILABLE SHIPPERS, INC.; )

PREFERRED SHIPPERS, INC.; )

PROMPT SHIPPERS, INC.; and QUICK )

TRANSPORTATION, INC., )

) 2:06-cv-1053-GEB-KJM

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

AAR MANUFACTURING, INC.; AAR )

MOBILITY SYSTEMS; DEFENSE CONTRACT )

MANAGEMENT AGENCY, )

 )

Defendants. )

)

Trial is scheduled to commence in this action on February

26, 2008. Today the court attempted to contact Plaintiffs’ counsel

before an Order to Show Cause issued, since Plaintiff has not filed

any trial document required by the Final Pretrial Order issued on

December 14, 2007, but received a busy tone. The court then contacted

Defendants’ counsel, Jamie S. Platto, who informed the court that the

case has settled, but that there is one minor matter for the parties

to resolve which will not interfere with the settlement. Local Rule

16-160(a) obligates parties to immediately notify the court of a

settlement. 

Case 2:06-cv-01053-GEB -GGH Document 77 Filed 02/19/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 In the meantime, the parties shall not assume that trial will

not proceed as scheduled or that they will not be required to submit the

required trial documents and/or suffer other consequences for their

failure to do so.

2

In light of the failure of the parties to file proposed jury

instructions and other required trial documents, and Defendants’

counsel’s representation that this action has settled, a hearing on

whether this action should be dismissed without prejudice is scheduled

to commence at 10:00 a.m. on February 21, 2008.1 Any filing opposing

the dismissal is due no later than 4:00 p.m. on February 19, 2008; if

no filing is made by this time, the hearing is vacated and the action

is dismissed without prejudice since it will be presumed that the

parties agree to dismissal of the action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2008

Case 2:06-cv-01053-GEB -GGH Document 77 Filed 02/19/08 Page 2 of 2