Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00324/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00324-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAGI MUKATIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

R. HESSELTINE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-0324-AWI-SMS PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 52)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION,

WITHOUT PREJaUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

Plaintiff Sagi Mukatin (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 12, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendation that recommended Defendants’ motion to dismiss

be granted. The Findings and Recommendation was served on all

parties and contained notice that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendation was to be filed within thirty days. Pursuant

to Plaintiff’s request, on July 30, 2007, the Magistrate Judge

gave Plaintiff thirty more days within which to object. No

objections have been filed.

Case 1:05-cv-00324-AWI -SMS Document 65 Filed 09/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed June 12, 2007,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED; and

3. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)

by exhausting his claim prior to filing suit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 21, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

9h0d30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00324-AWI -SMS Document 65 Filed 09/21/07 Page 2 of 2