Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01790/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01790-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Leonardo Joseph Rangel (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On July 3, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file his opposition 

to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff contends that the Court allowed Defendants 

to file their motion for summary judgment, but did not address Plaintiff’s pending discovery motions.1 

Plaintiff also explains that he requires additional time because he is preparing for a resentencing 

hearing and will be transported to court. 

Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s request for a forty-five (45) day extension of time to file his 

opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is HEREBY GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file 

 

1

Prior to Plaintiff’s filing of the requested extension, the Court issued rulings on all but one pending discovery 

motion. Plaintiff also has filed a motion to amend the complaint, which the Court will address in due course. 

LEONARDO JOSEPH RANGEL,

 Plaintiff,

v.

D. LATRAILLE, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01790-AWI-BAM PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST 

FOR AN EXTENSION OF 45 DAYS TO FILE AN 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 69)

FORTY-FIVE DAY DEADLINE

Case 1:10-cv-01790-BAM Document 71 Filed 07/11/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

his opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment within forty-five (45) days from the date 

of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 11, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01790-BAM Document 71 Filed 07/11/13 Page 2 of 2