Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00027/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00027-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JEFFREY LANINI, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB 

ORDER 

On August 1, 2016, the court issued an order denying the plaintiffs’ request for 

relief from deadlines imposed by the court’s pretrial scheduling order. ECF No. 87. On August 9, 

2016, the plaintiffs filed “objections” to this order, requesting reconsideration. ECF No. 89. 

All motions must be noticed on the motion calendar of the assigned judge or 

magistrate judge. E.D. Cal. 230(b). If necessary, a party may obtain expedited relief by filing an 

ex parte application. See generally Mission Power Eng’g Co. v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 883 F. Supp. 

488 (C.D. Cal. 1995); see also Standing Order 5, ECF No. 5-1 (listing requirements for ex parte

applications). 

The plaintiffs’ request for reconsideration was not set for a hearing on the court’s 

civil law and motion calendar, was not accompanied by an explanation for why emergency or 

expedited relief is necessary, and does not comply with the provisions of this court’s standing 

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 90 Filed 08/11/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

order. Within seven days, the plaintiffs shall give notice of a hearing date or file an amended 

request for reconsideration, or the request for reconsideration will be denied summarily. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 11, 2016 

Case 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB Document 90 Filed 08/11/16 Page 2 of 2