Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01688/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01688-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 368
Nature of Suit: Asbestos Personal Injury - Prod.liab.
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH BREWSTER and CECIL

BREWSTER,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-01688 WHA

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE

The Court has received Ms. Chun’s application to appear pro hac vice. Ms. Chun’s

application indicates that she is an active member in good standing of the bar of the Supreme

Court of California. She apparently practices in Berkeley, California. By 4:00 P.M. on

TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2007, Ms. Chun will please file a statement indicating why the Court

should not find her ineligible to practice pro hac vice under Civil Local Rule 11-3(b), which

states that an applicant is ineligible if she (1) resides in the State of California or (2) is regularly

engaged in the practice of law in the State of California. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 3, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-01688-WHA Document 25 Filed 04/03/07 Page 1 of 1