Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03592/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03592-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INTAGIO CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

No. C-06-3592 PJH (EMC)

ORDER RE JOINT LETTER OF MAY 9,

2007 RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

(Docket No. 108)

The parties’ discovery dispute came on for hearing by telephone on May 10, 2007. Having

considered the joint letter filed by the parties and argument of counsel, and good cause appearing

therefor, the Court hereby orders as follows.

Tiger Oak’s motion to compel production of documents based on Intagio’s waiver of

privilege for documents listed in the first three paragraphs of its “Privilege Log” filed in November,

2006 is DENIED. Given Mr. Lewicky’s representation to the Court and counsel that no documents

under the second category dated prior to the filing of the compliant in this matter have been withheld

and that all the documents withheld are litigation-related, Tiger Oak has failed to demonstrate any

reasonable possibility that the documents described in these three categories are not privileged. 

Because these categories of documents, on their face, are privileged as communications and

documents directly related to the prosecution of this litigation, Intagio had good cause to describe 

///

///

///

///

Case 4:06-cv-03592-PJH Document 110 Filed 05/10/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

them generically rather than providing a privilege log for each document. Nor has Tiger Oak

demonstrated any prejudice from Intagio’s provision of a generic privilege log.

This order disposes of Docket No. 108.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2007

_________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:06-cv-03592-PJH Document 110 Filed 05/10/07 Page 2 of 2