Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00206/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00206-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983pr Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY DUANE DICKEY,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 17-cv-206-WQH-AGS

v. ORDER

GILBERT MENDOZA, and THE,

WARDEN,

 

 Defendants. 

 

 

 

HAYES, Judge:

The matter before the Court is the review of the Report and Recommendation

issued by United States Magistrate Judge recommending that the motion to dismiss filed

by the Warden (ECF No. 11) be granted. (ECF No. 37).

The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation

of a magistrate judge are set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28

U.S.C. § 636(b). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those

portions of the report . . . to which objection is made,” and “may accept, reject, or

modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The district court need not review de novo those portions of a

Report and Recommendation to which neither party objects. See Wang v. Masaitis, 416

F.3d 992, 1000 n.13 (9th Cir. 2005); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“Neither the Constitution nor the [Federal Magistrates Act]

- 1 - 17-cv-206-WQH-AGS

Case 3:17-cv-00206-WQH-AGS Document 43 Filed 01/05/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

requires a district judge to review, de novo, findings and recommendations that the

parties themselves accept as correct.”).

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record, and the

submissions of the parties. The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly

recommended that the Motion to Dismiss the warden be granted. 

III. Conclusion

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 37)

is adopted in its entirety. The motion to dismiss the Warden (ECF No. 11) is granted. 

DATED: January 5, 2018

WILLIAM Q. HAYES

United States District Judge

- 2 - 17-cv-206-WQH-AGS

Case 3:17-cv-00206-WQH-AGS Document 43 Filed 01/05/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2