Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-mc-80235/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-mc-80235-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1

Case No.: 5:15-mc-80235-EJD

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRUCE IVES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:15-mc-80235-EJD 

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE 

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young has been declared a vexatious litigant and is subject to a 

pre-filing order which specifically requires him to “obtain leave of court before filing any further 

suits alleging any violations of the federal criminal statutes, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b), 18 

U.S.C. § 371, and the FTCA, codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq.” See Docket Item No. 40, Case 

No. 3:13-cv-04442-EMC. Undeterred by the numerous other occasions when this court has 

denied him leave to file the same Complaint,1Plaintiff again seeks to file a Complaint against 

Bruce Ives and F. Joseph Warin for alleged violations of two statutes enumerated in the pre-filing 

order - §§ 1512(b) and 1512(c). The court reviews the pleading to “determine whether Plaintiff 

has stated a potentially cognizable claim in short, intelligible and plain statement.” Id. 

 

1

See Case Nos. 5:14-mc-80332-BLF; 5:15-mc-80335-BLF; 3:14-mc-80343-WHA; 5:15-mc80031-YGR; 5:15-mc-80149-BLF; 5:15-mc-80151-EJD; 5:15-mc-80172-EJD; 5:15-mc-80192-

EJD; 5:15-mc-80212-BLF. 

Case 5:15-mc-80235-EJD Document 2 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:15-mc-80235-EJD

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

He has not. Simply put, the criminal statutes Plaintiff cites in the Complaint do not 

provide for a private cause of action. This remains true no matter how many times he submits this 

pleading. The Complaint is therefore barred by the pre-filing order and leave to file it is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 16, 2015

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-mc-80235-EJD Document 2 Filed 09/16/15 Page 2 of 2