Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01942/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01942-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

FOR OCTOBER 29, 2007 HEARING 

CASE NO. C 07-01942-MHP 

RONALD S. LEMIEUX (SBN 120822) 

ronlemieux@paulhastings.com 

MICHAEL N. EDELMAN (SBN 180948) 

michaeledelman@paulhastings.com 

VIDYA R. BHAKAR (SBN 220210) 

vidbhakar@paulhastings.com 

SHANÉE Y. WILLIAMS (SBN 221310) 

shaneewilliams@paulhastings.com 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

Five Palo Alto Square, Sixth Floor 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 

Telephone: (650) 320-1800 

Facsimile: (650) 320-1900 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. AND 

ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS 

COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RICOH COMPANY, LTD., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 07-01942-MHP 

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR OCTOBER 29, 2007 

HEARING 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Asustek Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International 

(collectively “Asustek”) have indicated they intend to bring a motion for the October 29, 2007 

hearing to dismiss the third counterclaim for infringement of the ‘109 Patent asserted by 

Defendant Ricoh Company, Ltd. (“Ricoh”); 

 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that further meet and confer between the parties may 

be productive in order to resolve the issues raised by Asustek; and 

 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to modify the briefing schedule on Asustek’s motion 

in order to allow more time for the parties to meet and confer.

Case 3:07-cv-01942-MHP Document 40 Filed 10/02/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

FOR OCTOBER 29, 2007 HEARING 

LEGAL_US_W # 57142530.1 2 

CASE NO. C 07-01942-MHP 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The hearing on Asustek’s motion shall be on October 29, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. 

2. Asustek’s motion to dismiss shall be filed and served on or before October 1, 2007. 

3. Ricoh’s opposition to the motion shall be filed and served on or before October 15, 2007. 

4. Asustek’s reply in support of the motion shall be filed and served on or before October 

22, 2007. 

DATED: September 24, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

RONALD S. LEMIEUX 

MICHAEL N. EDELMAN 

VIDYA R. BHAKAR 

SHANÉE Y. WILLIAMS 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

By: /s/ 

 MICHAEL EDELMAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER 

INTERNATIONAL 

DATED: September 24, 2007 J.C. Rozendaal, pro hac vice 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, 

EVANS & FIGEL, PLLC 

Daniel J. Bergeson 

Donald P. Gagliardi 

Marc G. Van Niekerk 

BERGESON, LLP 

By: /s/ 

 J.C. ROZENDAAL 

Attorneys for Defendant 

RICOH COMPANY, LTD 

Case 3:07-cv-01942-MHP Document 40 Filed 10/02/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

FOR OCTOBER 29, 2007 HEARING 

LEGAL_US_W # 57142530.1 3 

CASE NO. C 07-01942-MHP 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

 The undersigned hereby certifies that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation and 

[Proposed] Order has been obtained from J.C. Rozendaal, counsel for Defendant. 

 /s/ Michael N. Edelman 

 MICHAEL N. EDELMAN 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: September ___, 2007 

 Honorable Marilyn H. Patel 

October 1, 2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:07-cv-01942-MHP Document 40 Filed 10/02/07 Page 3 of 3