Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-00564/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-00564-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRYANT FLOWERS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-01-0564 DFL PAN P

vs.

EDWARD ALAMEDA, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed December 18, 2003, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within

twenty days, why his action should not be dismissed. The court previously found plaintiff’s

amended complaint failed to state a claim and gave plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended

complaint. (See August 6, 2002 Order.) Plaintiff has not shown cause, filed a second amended

complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's 

Case 2:01-cv-00564-DFL-PAN Document 36 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 23, 2006.

/001;flow0564.fsc

Case 2:01-cv-00564-DFL-PAN Document 36 Filed 02/24/06 Page 2 of 2