Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_18-cv-01980/USCOURTS-azd-2_18-cv-01980-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 896
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09:1 U.S. Arbitration Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Tilted Kilt Franchise Operating LLC,

Petitioner,

v. 

Falinason Incorporated, et al.,

Respondents.

No. CV-18-01980-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

Before the Court are Petitioner’s reinstated motions for default judgment against 

Nirav and Lina Patel (“the Patels”). (Docs. 14, 23.) On December 21, 2018, the Court 

granted default judgment against the Patels and their business, Falinason Inc. 

(“Falinason”). (Doc. 25.) However, after determining that Falinason had filed for 

bankruptcy, resulting in an automatic stay of this matter as to it, the Court vacated its prior 

order on January 4, 2019 and required Petitioner to submit a supplemental memorandum

addressing whether the bankruptcy stay also stayed this matter as to the Patels—who had 

not filed for bankruptcy—as long as Falinason remained a party, since Petitioner seeks a 

joint and several judgment against all respondents. (Doc. 27.) Petitioner filed its 

supplemental memorandum on January 17, 2019. The motions are now ripe for ruling. 

This action may procced and default judgment will be entered against the Patels—

for the reasons explained in its December 21, 2018 order (Doc. 25)—despite the operation 

of a bankruptcy stay as to Falinason. An automatic bankruptcy stay only operates to protect 

Case 2:18-cv-01980-DLR Document 30 Filed 01/30/20 Page 1 of 3
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

“the debtor, property of the debtor or property of the estates. It does not protect non-debtor 

parties or their property. [It] does not stay actions against guarantors, sureties, corporate 

affiliates, or other non-debtor parties liable on the debts of the debtor.” In re Chugach 

Forest Prod., Inc., 23 F.3d 241, 246 (9th Cir. 1994) (quotations and citations omitted). 

Furthermore, Falinason’s bankruptcy stay cannot be imputed to the Patels, even though 

they are its only directors and owners, because it is within the sole province of the 

bankruptcy court to determine if an automatic stay should be extended, and the bankruptcy 

court has made no such determination. Coach, Inc. v. Celco Customs Serv. Co., No. CV11-10787MMM(FMOx), 2012 WL 12883843, at *4 (C.D. Cal. July 6, 2012); see also In

re American Hardwoods, Inc., 885 F.2d 621, 627 (9th Cir. 1989) (allowing case to proceed 

against individual defendants despite automatic bankruptcy stay as to corporate entity 

owned by individual defendants). Finally, because an arbitrator already determined the 

merits of this dispute and entered an award in favor of Petitioner against all respondents 

jointly and severally, Petitioner may pursue any individual respondent for the entire 

amount. Honeycutt v. U.S., 137 S.Ct. 1626, 1631 (2017) (citation omitted) (“If two or more 

defendants jointly case harm, each defendant is held liable for the entire amount of the 

harm; provided, however, that the plaintiff recover only once for the full amount.”). 

Consequently, Petitioner may properly seek the entry of default judgment against the 

Patels, and the Patels only, despite the stay applied to Falinason. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s motions for default judgment against the Patels 

(Docs. 14,1 23) are GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that default judgment shall be entered in favor of 

Petitioner and against Lina and Nirav Patel as follows: 

1. Judgment is entered against and Lina and Nirav Patel, jointly and severally, in

the amount of $1,486,811.55.

2. Attorneys’ fees and costs accruing in the arbitration in the total amount of

$22,941.39 against Lina and Nirav Patel, jointly and severally. 

1 Doc. 14, insofar as it seeks default judgment against Falinason, is denied. 

Case 2:18-cv-01980-DLR Document 30 Filed 01/30/20 Page 2 of 3
- 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. Interest that has accrued on the above amounts against Lina and Nirav Patel, 

jointly and severally, in the amount of $42,314.44. Notwithstanding this award 

of interest, simple interest at a rate of one percent (1%) plus the prime rate shall 

accrue on the amounts in paragraphs 1 and 2 above from September 12, 2018 

until paid. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

55(b), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this order and terminate

this case.

Dated this 29th day of January, 2020.

Douglas L. Rayes

United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cv-01980-DLR Document 30 Filed 01/30/20 Page 3 of 3