Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05932/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05932-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL PADDOCK,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:04-CV-5932-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO WITHDRAWN HIS MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND

DEEMING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF WITHDRAWN 

(Docs. 50 and 52) 

Plaintiff Michael Paddock (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1 (Religious Land Use and

Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000). On December 19, 2005, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking a

preliminary injunction prohibiting Defendants Mendoza-Powers and Woodford from enforcing the

grooming regulations against him. On February 17, 2006, the Court issued an order requiring

Plaintiff either notify the Court that his pending motion is moot, or file a supplement to his motion

setting forth the reason for his belief that his motion is not moot. On March 20, 2006, Plaintiff filed

a motion seeking to withdraw his motion for preliminary injunctive relief on the ground that it is

moot in light of the recent modification to the grooming regulations.

///

///

///

///

Case 1:04-cv-05932-OWW -SMS Document 53 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his motion for preliminary injunctive relief is

GRANTED, and the motion for preliminary injunctive relief filed on December 19, 2005, is deemed

WITHDRAWN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05932-OWW -SMS Document 53 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2