Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00587/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00587-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Proposed Order on Stipulation for Dismissal - FINAL.DOCX

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GIBBS

GIDEN

LOCHER

TURNER

SENET

&

WITTBRODT LLP

William D. Locher, Esq. (CSB # 090548)

wlocher@gibbsgiden.com

Luke N. Eaton, Esq. (CSB # 280387)

lneaton@gibbsgiden.com

GIBBS GIDEN LOCHER TURNER

SENET & WITTBRODT LLP

1880 Century Park East, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, California 90067-1621

(310) 552-3400

Fax (310) 552-0805

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GENERAL SUPPLY & SERVICES, INC.,

a Delaware corporation, dba GEXPRO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GENERAL SUPPLY & SERVICES,

INC., A DELAWARE

CORPORATION, DBA GEXPRO,

Plaintiff,

v.

ACTION SERVICES GROUP, INC., a

Pennsylvania corporation; and DOES 1

through 10, inclusive,

Defendant.

v.

SAFEWAY INC.,

 Third Party Defendant

Case No. C-15-00587 MEJ

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE

STIPULATION TO DISMISS RE

CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT

Pursuant to the Stipulation of all of the Parties to the Complaint, and for good

cause shown, the Court Orders as follows:

///

Case 3:15-cv-00587-MEJ Document 57 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 2
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Proposed Order on Stipulation for Dismissal - FINAL.DOCX

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GIBBS

GIDEN

LOCHER

TURNER

SENET

&

WITTBRODT LLP

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint filed by Plaintiff GENERAL

SUPPLY & SERVICES, INC. dba GEXPRO (“GEXPRO”) in the above-captioned

action be dismissed, without prejudice, based on the terms set forth in the Stipulation

between GEXPRO and Defendant ACTION SERVICES GROUP, INC.

(“ACTION”). It is further ordered that this Court shall expressly retain jurisdiction

over this action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6, or any applicable

Federal rule or procedure, to set aside the dismissal and enforce the terms of the

parties’ written settlement agreement in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation,

and enter a Judgment against ACTION pursuant to the written Stipulation for Entry

of Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: By:

The Honorable Maria-Elena James

Magistrate Judge

United States District Court 

Northern District

August 26, 2015

Case 3:15-cv-00587-MEJ Document 57 Filed 08/26/15 Page 2 of 2