Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00883/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00883-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE LUIS GODOY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00883-WHO 

ORDER REGARDING EVIDENCE 

SUBMITTED IN OPPOSITION TO 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants filed objections to the evidence plaintiffs’ submitted in opposition to their

motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 97-1. One of defendants’ objections is that none of the 

ten attachments to plaintiffs’ opposition brief was presented with a supporting affidavit or 

declaration. 

If plaintiffs intend to authenticate any documents to which defendants have objected, they 

should do so by July 1, 2016. The Court notes that one submission indicated that two videos were 

intended to be filed as evidence, but the Court has received only the video entitled “Andy Lopez 

Supporters Cross Police Line, Youth Face Riot Cops.” Defendants’ may file any further

evidentiary objections by July 5, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 28, 2016

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00883-WHO Document 98 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 1