Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02341/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02341-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 12:22 Securities Fraud

---

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

PAGE LIMITS OF REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

Paul H. Dawes (Bar No. 55191) 

John C. Tang (Bar No. 212371) 

Andrew M. Farthing (Bar No. 237565) 

140 Scott Drive 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: 650.328.4600 

Facsimile: 650.463.2600 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

David M. Friedman (Bar No. 209214) 

Samuel B. Lutz (Bar No. 241165) 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: 415.391.0600 

Facsimile: 415.395.8095 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Waste 

Connections, Inc., Defendants Mittelstaedt, Davis, 

Dupreau, Bouck, Chambliss, Eddie, Foos, Hall, 

Hansen, Hunt, Little, Moser, Rose and Specially 

Appearing Defendants Harlan and Razzouk 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

KENNETH TRAVIS, et al., 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 v. 

RONALD J. MITTELSTAEDT, et al., 

 Defendant(s), 

and 

WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC., 

Nominal Defendant. 

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-02341-LEW-GGH 

“CONSOLIDATED ACTION” 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

PAGE LIMITS OF REPLY BRIEFS IN 

SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

LAWRENCE PIERCE, et al., 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 v. 

RONALD J. MITTELSTAEDT, et al., 

 Defendant(s), 

and 

WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC., 

Nominal Defendant. 

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 58 Filed 10/18/07 Page 1 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

PAGE LIMITS OF REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2007, Nominal Defendant Waste Connections (“Waste 

Connections”) moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ consolidated complaint for failure to make a pre-suit 

demand pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.1; 

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2007, Individual Defendants moved to dismiss 

plaintiffs’ consolidated complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6); 

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2007, Specially Appearing Defendants Messrs. Harlan 

and Razzouk also moved to dismiss certain claims for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to 

Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a consolidated opposition brief in response to Waste 

Connections’ motion to dismiss and the Individual Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and filed a 

separate opposition brief in response to Specially Appearing Defendants Messrs. Harlan and 

Razzouk motion to dismiss; 

IT IS SO STIPULATED by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties 

that: 

1. The maximum acceptable length for Nominal Defendant Waste 

Connections’ reply in support of the motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ consolidated complaint for 

failure to make a pre-suit demand pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.1 shall be fifteen (15) pages; 

2. The maximum acceptable length for Individual Defendants’ reply in 

support of the motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ consolidated complaint for failure to state a claim 

pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) shall be fifteen (15) pages; 

3. The maximum acceptable length for Specially Appearing Defendants 

Messrs. Harlan and Razzouk also moved to dismiss certain claims for lack of personal 

jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) shall be fifteen (15) pages. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 58 Filed 10/18/07 Page 2 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

PAGE LIMITS OF REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: October 17, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

Paul H. Dawes 

John C. Tang 

David M. Friedman 

 By: /S/ 

 David M. Friedman 

 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

Waste Connections, Inc., Individual 

Defendants Mittelstaedt, Davis, 

Dupreau, Bouck, Chambliss, Eddie, 

Foos, Hall, Hansen, Hunt, Little, 

Moser, Rose and Specially Appearing 

Defendants Harlan and Razzouk 

Dated: October 16, 2007 SCHIFFRIN BARROWAY 

 TOPAZ & KESSLER LLP 

 By: /S/ with express permission on 10/17/07

 Alan R. Plutzik 

 Alan R. Plutzik (Bar No. 077785) 

 Timothy Fisher (Bar No. 191626) 

 Nichole T. Browning 

 

 SCHIFFRIN BARROWAY 

 TOPAZ & KESSLER LLP 

 Eric L. Zagar 

 J. Daniel Albert 

 280 King of Prussia Road 

 Radnor, PA 19087 

COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN 

& ROBBINS LLP 

Darren J. Robbins 

Travis E. Downs III 

James I. Jaconette 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 58 Filed 10/18/07 Page 3 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

PAGE LIMITS OF REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. 

Dated: October 18, 2007 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 58 Filed 10/18/07 Page 4 of 4