Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01741/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01741-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

ENLARGE TIME TO FILE 

-1- CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01741-EMC (MEJ)

DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452

JOHN L. SLAFSKY, State Bar No. 195513

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

650 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304-1050

Telephone: (650) 493-9300

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100

dkramer@wsgr.com

jslafsky@wsgr.com

COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, Suite 3300

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 947-2000

Facsimile: (415) 947-2099

cbal@wsgr.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant

DROPBOX, INC. 

IAN K. BOYD, State Bar No. 191434 

SISKIND BOYD LLP

Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 354-0100 

Facsimile: (415) 391-7124 

iboyd@harveysiskind.com

JOHN M. CONE, pro hac vice

RYAN A. STARNES, pro hac vice

FERGUSON BRASWELL FRASER

KUBASTA PC 

2500 Dallas Parkway #600

Plano, Texas 75093 

Telephone: (972) 378-9111 

Facsimile: (972) 378-9115

jcone@dallasbusinesslaw.com

rstarnes@dallasbusinesslaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

THRU INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DROPBOX, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

THRU INC., a Delaware corporation,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:15-CV-01741-EMC (MEJ)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME TO 

FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY 

PAPERS TO DROPBOX, INC.’S 

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES 

AND COSTS

Date: February 23, 2017

Time: 1:30 p.m.

Before: Hon. Edward M. Chen

Dept.: Courtroom 5, 17th Floor

THRU INC., a Delaware corporation,

Counterclaimant,

v.

DROPBOX, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Counter-Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case 3:15-cv-01741-EMC Document 161 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

ENLARGE TIME TO FILE 

-2- CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01741-EMC (MEJ)

Dropbox, Inc. (“Dropbox”) and Thru, Inc. (“Thru”) submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] 

Order to Enlarge Time to File Opposition and Reply Papers to Dropbox, Inc.’s Motion for 

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Motion”).

Dropbox filed a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs on January 9, 2017. Dkt. No. 153. 

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7 and Local Rule 7-3, Thru’s deadline to file its Opposition 

is January 23, 2017 and Dropbox’s deadline to file its Reply is January 30, 2017. A hearing is 

noticed for February 23, 2017, but Dropbox has proposed submitting the matter on the papers. 

Thru considers that a hearing is appropriate. The parties respectfully request that the deadlines for 

Thru’s Opposition be extended to February 3, 2017 and Dropbox’s Reply be extended to February 

13, 2017 to give the parties to have additional time to prepare their papers. 

If the requested extensions require a continuation of the February 23, 2017 hearing date, 

and the Court believes a hearing is necessary, the parties request that the hearing be rescheduled at 

the Court’s earliest convenience. 

Dated: January 19, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: /s/ David H. Kramer

DAVID H. KRAMER

JOHN L. SLAFSKY

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant

DROPBOX, INC.

Dated: January 19, 2017 SISKIND BOYD LLP

By: /s/ Ian K. Boyd

IAN K. BOYD

FERGUSON, BRASWELL FRASER

KUBASTA PC 

JOHN M. CONE

RYAN A. STARNES

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

THRU INC.

Case 3:15-cv-01741-EMC Document 161 Filed 01/31/17 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

ENLARGE TIME TO FILE 

-3- CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01741-EMC (MEJ)

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation and good cause appearing, it is so ORDERED:

1. Thru Inc. shall have until February 3, 2017 to file its Opposition to Dropbox 

Inc.’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; 

2. Dropbox, Inc. shall have until February 13, 2017 to file its Reply to Thru Inc.’s 

Opposition to Dropbox Inc.’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; and 

3. Dropbox, Inc.’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs shall be heard at 1:30 p.m. 

on February 23, 2017.

Dated: January ____, 2017

The Honorable Edward M. Chen

United States District Court Judge

31

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-01741-EMC Document 161 Filed 01/31/17 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

ENLARGE TIME TO FILE 

-4- CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01741-EMC (MEJ)

CERTIFICATION

I, IAN K. BOYD, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE 

OPPOSITION AND REPLY PAPERS TO DROPBOX, INC.’S MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby 

attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all of the 

signatories.

Dated: January 19, 2017 /s/ Ian K. Boyd

IAN K. BOYD

Case 3:15-cv-01741-EMC Document 161 Filed 01/31/17 Page 4 of 4