Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00162/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00162-111/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIMS

CASE NO. 06-0162 (MMC) 

NANCY J. GEENEN (CA BAR NO. 135968)

JASON M. JULIAN (CA BAR NO. 215342)

MICHAEL J. SONG (CA BAR NO. 243675)

GINA A. BIBBY (CA BAR NO. 242657) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA, SIXTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3404

TELEPHONE: (415) 434-4484

FACSIMILE: (415) 434-4507

NGEENEN@FOLEY.COM

JJULIAN@FOLEY.COM

MSONG@FOLEY.COM

GBIBBY@FOLEY.COM

MICHAEL D. KAMINSKI (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE)

KENNETH E. KROSIN (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE)

GEORGE C. BEST (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE)

SHAUN R. SNADER (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE)

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

WASHINGTON HARBOUR

3000 K STREET, N.W., SUITE 500 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20007-5143

TELEPHONE: (202) 672-5300

FACSIMILE: (202) 672-5399

MKAMINSKI@FOLEY.COM

KKROSIN@FOLEY.COM

GBEST@FOLEY.COM

SSNADER@FOLEY.COM

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF NICHIA CORPORATION

Nichia Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Seoul Semiconductor, Ltd. and Seoul 

Semiconductor, Inc., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 3:06-CV-0162-MMC (JCS) 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF 

NICHIA CORPORATION’S MOTION 

FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER 

CONSTRUING CLAIMS

Judge: Maxine M. Chesney

The Court, having considered all papers file in support of and in opposition to 

plaintiff Nichia Corporation’s Motion For Reconsideration Of Order Construing 

Claims, GRANTS plaintiff’s motion. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Order Construing Claims (D.I. # 664) 

is modified by replacing the word “opaque” on page 3, line 15 of the order, with the 

word “transparent,” so that U.S. Design Patent No. 490,784 is construed as claiming 

an ornamental design for an LED comprising: 

Case 3:06-cv-00162-MMC Document 788 Filed 09/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIMS

CASE NO. 06-0162 (MMC) 

(1) an elongated generally rectangular body having: 

(a) a rear portion with top, bottom, and side surfaces that taper 

inwardly, and which portion is joined to a front portion by a parting line that bisects 

the body lengthwise, 

(b) the center section of its rear surface recessed and tapered outwardly 

toward the left and right sections of the rear surface, 

(c) the lateral ends of its bottom surface raised, and 

(d) its front surface having an elongated transparent window with 

peaked top and bottom rims and circularly-curved left and right rims; and 

(2) two spaced-apart substantially right-angled electrodes, one on either side 

of the body, each electrode: 

(a) protruding laterally from the body, and 

(b) having a vertical leg and a substantially horizontal leg joined by a 

curved radius such that the electrode has an “L” shape when viewed from the right 

side of the LED and a backward “L” shape when viewed from the left side of the 

LED, the vertical and substantially horizontal legs having parallel, flat, exposed 

surfaces, the substantially horizontal leg extending rearwardly and being substantially 

flush with the body’s bottom surface, a portion of the substantially horizontal leg 

extending below the lateral end of the raised bottom surface of the body, the vertical 

leg having a flat top and a rounded outer corner, and the height of the vertical leg 

being more than a majority of the body’s height. 

Dated: September 25, 2007 

 HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY

Case 3:06-cv-00162-MMC Document 788 Filed 09/25/07 Page 2 of 2