Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02184/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02184-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE 

COUNCIL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GINA MCCARTHY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.16-cv-02184-JST 

ORDER

Re: ECF No. 55

The Court has received Defendants’ stipulated request for a two-day extension of time to 

file their reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss. ECF No. 55. Defendants base their 

request on the government’s desire to spend two additional days completing its internal review of 

its brief. The government’s internal review process is not a new or unanticipated event. Also, the 

request was filed on the day the reply brief was due, leaving no time for the Court to consider the 

request and still require that the brief be timely filed. 

Nonetheless, the Court grants the request. Future requests for enlargement of time that 

either fail to state good cause or leave insufficient time for the Court’s review will likely be 

denied, even if the requests are the subject of a stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 20, 2016

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-02184-JST Document 56 Filed 09/20/16 Page 1 of 1