Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01000/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01000-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________________

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING

MUSSEN V. KAISER; US DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. C06-01000 MHP

-1-

RICHARD P. DUANE (SBN 37880)

DIANE STANTON (SBN 142196)

DUANE & SELTZER, LLP

2000 Center Street, Suite 300

Berkeley, CA 94704

Tel: (510) 841-8575

Fax: (510) 845-3016

Attorneys for Plaintiff SHARON MUSSEN

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT

OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO

SHARON MUSSEN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN,

INC., KAISER FOUNDATION MEDICAL

GROUP, INC., and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive,

_____________________________________/

Case No. C06-01000 MHP

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

HEARING;[PROPOSED] ORDER

Hearing Date: February 5, 2007

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Judge: The Honorable Marilyn Patel

Crtrm. 15

Whereas on Monday, January 29, 2007, counsel for the Plaintiff was informed that he may

be replaced by a new and separate counsel, and whereas the counsel for the Plaintiff has not been

able to get in touch with the potential new counsel in time to discuss the hearing scheduled for

Monday, February 5, 2007, and Plaintiff’s counsel has asked defense counsel to agree to a short

continuance of this hearing until the matter of whether new counsel is going to come into the case,

both counsel for the defendant and the plaintiff hereby agree to Stipulate to a Continuance of the

matter as long as it is not set between February 19 and February 26 or on the afternoon of March 1

or March 2.

Case 3:06-cv-01000-EMC Document 30 Filed 02/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

____________________________________

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING

MUSSEN V. KAISER; US DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. C06-01000 MHP

-2-

IT IS SO STIPULATED,

DUANE & SELTZER, LLP

//s//

____________________ ____________________________ 

Dated RICHARD P. DUANE

Attorney for Plaintiff

MARION’S INN

//s//

_____________________ _____________________________

Dated MARK PALLEY, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant

Based on the findings of fact as set out in the STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING 

and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the request as

set out in the Stipulation to continue the hearing for the Cross Motion for Summary Judgment as to

Standard Review and the Case Management Conference currently set for February 5, 2007, in the

above-captioned matter, be continued to a later date is hereby GRANTED. 

Dated: _____________________

_______________________________________

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

Case 3:06-cv-01000-EMC Document 30 Filed 02/02/07 Page 2 of 2