Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01617/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01617-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM CHENG and JANET CHENG,

Appellants,

v.

ARTHUR OSTERBACK, et al.

Appellees.

No. 2:15-cv-01617-TLN

ORDER DENYING APPEALLANTS’ 

MOTION TO SET ASIDE THIS COURT’S 

ORDER DISMISSING APPELLANT’S 

BANKRUPTCY APPEAL

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Appellants William and Janet Cheng’s 

(“Appellants”) motion to set aside this Court’s order dismissing Appellant’s bankruptcy appeal. 

(ECF No. 28.) Under Local Rule 230(j), when a motion for reconsideration is made, the party 

must provide the court with “what new or different facts or circumstances are claimed to exist 

which did not exist or were not shown upon such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the 

motion; and why the facts or circumstances were not shown at the time of the prior motion.” L.R. 

230(j)(3)‒(4). Appellants have failed to allege as such. Appellants briefing is thus deficient and 

their motion (ECF No. 28) is thus DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 11, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-01617-TLN Document 30 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 1