Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02922/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02922-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Tafari Music, Inc., et al., 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph R. Pompa, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV06-02922-PHX-SRB

ORDER

On January 20, 2010, this Court referred Defendant Joseph Pompa’s Requests for

Hearing on Garnishments to Magistrate Judge Aspey for hearing and to prepare a Report and

Recommendation. Magistrate Judge Aspey conducted the hearing on March 3, 2010 and

issued his Report and Recommendation on April 22, 2010. In his Report and

Recommendation the Magistrate Judge recommended that Defendant/Judgment Debtor’s

motions at Docket No. 40, 41 and 42 be denied. 

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that

they had 14 days from the date of service of copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds its in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

Case 2:06-cv-02922-SRB Document 55 Filed 06/18/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge as the order of this Court. (Doc. 54).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the motions at Docket No. 40, 41, and 42, seeking

to quash the writs of garnishment as to JP Morgan Chase Bank, American Express Company

and Bank of America are denied on the merits. (Docs. 40, 41, and 42). However, Plaintiff

released and quashed the Writs of Garnishment served on JPMorgan Chase (doc. 51) and

American Express (doc. 50) rendering Defendants’ Motion at docket 40 and 41 moot. The

Writ of Garnishment to Bank of America is valid and enforceable. 

DATED this 18th day of June, 2010.

Case 2:06-cv-02922-SRB Document 55 Filed 06/18/10 Page 2 of 2