Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05890/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05890-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON GERAY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

)

J.R. ANDREWS, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1: 03-cv-5890 AWI DLB P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND

GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

(Document #41)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

section 1983. On August 2, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations

that recommended Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted and this action be dismissed

because Plaintiff did not exhaust his administrative remedies. The Findings and

Recommendations gave the parties until August 27, 2007, to file objections. No objections were

filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

(9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the Findings and th

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. As found by the

Magistrate Judge, “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42

Case 1:03-cv-05890-AWI-DLB Document 58 Filed 09/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

U.S.C. § 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other

correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 42

U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Booth v. Churner, 121 S. Ct. 1819, 1821, 1825 (2001). 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on August 2,

2007 are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 5, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05890-AWI-DLB Document 58 Filed 09/05/07 Page 2 of 2