Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00653/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00653-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEX LAMOTA MARTI,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. A. BAIRES, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:08-cv-00653-AWI-SKO PC

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO 

SERVE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL ON THIRD PARTIES CDCR AND 

SATF, AND PROVIDING THIRD PARTIES 

TWENTY-ONE DAYS WITHIN WHICH TO 

RESPOND

(Doc. 94)

Plaintiff Alex Lamota Marti, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 9, 2008. This action is proceeding on 

Plaintiff’s amended complaint against Defendants Baires, Garza, and Knight for retaliation, in 

violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. (Docs. 12, 13.) 

On March 19, 2013, the Court issued an order directing the United States Marshal to serve 

subpoenas duces tecum on the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) 

and California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison (“SATF”). Fed. R. Civ. P. 

45. The subpoenas were personally served on March 27, 2013, and March 29, 2013, respectively, 

and the compliance with the subpoenas was required on May 14, 2013, at 3:00 p.m.

On September 9, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel CDCR and SATF to respond to 

the subpoenas. However, the motion was served only on Defendants’ counsel.

///

Case 1:08-cv-00653-AWI-SKO Document 95 Filed 10/01/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:

1. The Clerk’s Office shall serve a copy of Plaintiff’s motion to compel on:

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation,

Office of the Secretary,

c/o Legal Affairs

1515 S. Street

Sacramento, CA, 95814, and

California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison,

Custodian of Records,

c/o Litigation Office

P. O. Box 7100

Corcoran, CA, 93212;

2. CDCR and SATF shall respond to Plaintiff’s motion to compel within twenty-one

(21) days from the date of service of this order; and

3. Any request for an extension of time to file a response must be filed in compliance 

with Local Rule 144(d).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 30, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00653-AWI-SKO Document 95 Filed 10/01/13 Page 2 of 2