Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04152/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04152-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07685/0436/810780.1

JOHN B. SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 96742)

jbs@severson.com 

MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)

mdl@severson.com 

KALAMA M. LUI-KWAN (State Bar No. 242121)

kml@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-3344

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439

Attorneys for Defendant

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIKA HAMILTON, an individual, on her 

own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant.

Case No.: CV 09-04152 CW

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-1(a))

Case 4:09-cv-04152-CW Document 43 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 3
07685/0436/810780.1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, on December 18, 2009, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) filed 

motions to strike and to dismiss the initial complaint by plaintiff Marika Hamilton (“Plaintiff”);

WHEREAS, on April 12, 2010, the Court entered an order granting in part the motion to 

strike and granting the motion to dismiss with leave to amend Plaintiff’s fraud and Truth In Lending 

Act claims (“Order”);

WHEREAS, the Order states that “[i]f no second amended complaint is filed, Defendant must 

file an answer to the remaining claims within four weeks from the date of this order”, but does not set 

a deadline by which Wells Fargo must file an answer or other response to an amended complaint;

WHEREAS, on April 26, 2010, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Class Action Complaint 

(“FAC”);

WHEREAS, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Wells Fargo’s current deadline to 

answer or otherwise respond to the FAC is May 13, 2010;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to extend the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise 

respond to the FAC by two weeks; and

WHEREAS, the agreed-upon extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline 

already fixed by Court order;

NOW THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through their 

respective counsel, that:

1. The time for Wells Fargo to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC shall be 

extended until and including May 27, 2010; and

2. This stipulation is without prejudice to the rights, claims, arguments and defenses of 

all parties.

DATED: May 12, 2010 KAMBEREDELSON, LLC

By: /s/ Evan M. Meyers 

 Evan M. Meyers

 (admitted pro hac vice)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Marika Hamilton

Case 4:09-cv-04152-CW Document 43 Filed 05/13/10 Page 2 of 3
- 2 -

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07685/0436/810780.1

DATED: May 12, 2010 SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Kalama M. Lui-Kwan 

 Kalama M. Lui-Kwan

Attorneys for Defendant

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest 

under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from Evan 

M. Meyers.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Claudia Wilken

Case 4:09-cv-04152-CW Document 43 Filed 05/13/10 Page 3 of 3