Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01397/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01397-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

1 

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION– CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN

PHILIP A. MCLEOD, CASB 101101 

NATHAN JASKOWIAK, CASB 248007 

KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN 

450 Pacific Avenue 

San Francisco, California 94133 

Telephone: (415)398-6000 

Facsimile: (415)981-0136 

-andGREGORY M. SUDBURY 

Admitted Pro Hac 

KODIE P. BENNION 

Admitted Pro Hac 

QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS, 

WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C. 

2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone: (214) 880-1878 

Facsimile: (214) 871-2111 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 

JONATHAN M. JENKINS, CASB 193011 

LARA T. KAYAYAN, CASB 239384 

JENKINS KAYAYAN LLP

444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1530 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (310) 984-6800 

Facsimile: (310-984-6840 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE 

COMPANY, INC., 

Defendant. 

No. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN 

 The Hon. John A. Mendez 

 Robert T. Matsui Courthouse 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO 

CONCLUDE DISCOVERY 

 

After consideration of the Parties’ Stipulation to Extend the Deadline to Conclude 

Discovery, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

Case 2:13-cv-01397-JAM-KJN Document 89 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION– Case no. 2:13-cv-01397-jam-kjn

2 

The discovery deadline contained in the Third Amended Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) 

Order (Dkt. No. 68) is extended until January 22, 2016; and 

All discovery shall be completed by January 22, 2016. In this context, “completed” 

means that discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any 

disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, 

where discovery has been ordered, the order has been complied with. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 12/11/2015 

/s/ John A. Mendez _______ 

United States District Court Judge 

4839-0216-7340, v. 1-9228-5733, v. 1 

Case 2:13-cv-01397-JAM-KJN Document 89 Filed 12/14/15 Page 2 of 2