Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01406/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01406-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Anthony Wiley, Sr. asserts defendants Robert Goodman, the Bakersfield Police Department, 

and the Kern County Superior Court are liable for violations of his civil rights to equal protection and 

due process, “crimes against the disabled,” judicial corruption, and judicial misconduct. (See generally

Doc. 1) Because Plaintiff failed to comply with the Local Rules requiring Plaintiff to keep the Court 

apprised of a proper mailing address and failed to prosecute this action, the magistrate judge 

recommended the complaint be dismissed without prejudice on January 30, 2020.

Plaintiff was given fourteen days to file any objections to the recommendations that the action 

be dismissed. (Doc. 5 at 4) Plaintiff was “advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.” (Id., citing Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 

1153 (9th Cir. 1991); Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 834 (9th Cir. 2014)). Notably, this 

document was also returned to the Court as undeliverable on February 7, 2020. In addition, no 

objections have been filed. 

ANOTHONY WILEY, SR.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT GOODMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:19-cv-1406 - AWI - JLT

ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(Doc. 5)

Case 1:19-cv-01406-AWI-JLT Document 6 Filed 02/20/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United 

School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations are supported 

by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Findings and Recommendations dated January 30, 2020 (Doc. 5) are ADOPTED 

IN FULL;

2. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 20, 2020 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-01406-AWI-JLT Document 6 Filed 02/20/20 Page 2 of 2