Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01342/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01342-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERTO A. SOTELO,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. BIRRING, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01342-LJO-SMS PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

(Doc. 30, 32, 33)

Plaintiff Roberto A. Sotelo, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 10, 2008. This action is

proceeding on Plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed February 24, 2009, against Defendants Birring,

Das, Diep, and Coleman for acting with deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s medical needs, in

violation of the Eighth Amendment. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 1, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which

recommended denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for a PreliminaryInjunction. Plaintiff was provided thirty

days within which to file an Objection, but none was filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

1

Case 1:08-cv-01342-LJO-SKO Document 40 Filed 01/05/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 1, 2010, is adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, filed July 15, 2010, is DENIED,

without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-01342-LJO-SKO Document 40 Filed 01/05/11 Page 2 of 2