Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00048/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00048-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN O’CONNELL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0048 LKK KJM PS

vs.

UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS

ADMINISTRATION, et al.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

A status conference was held in this matter on May 31, 2006, before the

undersigned. Plaintiff appeared in propria persona. Erika Covarrubias appeared telephonically

for defendants. Upon consideration of the status reports on file in this action, discussion of

plaintiff and counsel and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS

FOLLOWS:

1. Initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) shall be

made within seven days from the date of this order.

2. Discovery is stayed pending resolution of defendants’ motion to dismiss and/or

for summary judgment, provided however that discovery necessary to oppose defendants’ motion

will be allowed upon a proper showing and noticed motion for leave to conduct discovery.

Case 2:06-cv-00048-LKK -KJM Document 19 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. Plaintiff is advised that as provided by Local Rule 78-230(c), opposition to the

granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule

further provides that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral

arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” 

Moreover, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of

opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that

failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and

all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” 

DATED: May 31, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

oconnell.oas

Case 2:06-cv-00048-LKK -KJM Document 19 Filed 06/01/06 Page 2 of 2