Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02006/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02006-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DON C. WILSON,

Petitioner,

vs.

D. K. SISTO,

Respondent.

No. 2:06-cv-02006-JKS

FINAL JUDGMENT

The Court having entered its Memorandum Decision of even date herewith disposing of all

the issues raised in the petition,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the Petition Under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court declines to issue a Certificate of

Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (a COA should

be granted where the applicant has made “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right,” i.e., when “reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition

should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to

deserve encouragement to proceed further” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted));

Hoffman v. Arave, 455 F.3d 926, 943 (9th Cir. 2006) (same). All federal constitutional issues

properly raised in the petition were deemed addressed by the Califonria Supreme Court in denying

Petitioner’s writ before that court, and no reasonable jurist could find that decision was “objectively

unreasonable.”

Dated: December 13, 2007.

s/ James K. Singleton, Jr.

JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-02006-JKS-KJM Document 13 Filed 12/13/07 Page 1 of 1