Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06441/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06441-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAGE ELECTROCHROMICS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

VIEW, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 12-cv-06441-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Last day for parties to amend “Disclosure of Asserted Claims 

and Infringement Contentions” and “Invalidity Contentions” May 20, 2015

Close of fact discovery August 14, 2015

Election of asserted claims for trial August 14, 2015

Complete settlement conference before Judge Grewal August 21, 2015

Expert disclosures (on any matter on which a party bears the 

burden of proof) August 31, 2015

Rebuttal expert disclosures September 28, 2015

Close of expert discovery October 30, 2015

Deadline for dispositive and Daubert motions, including motion 

for summary judgment November 30, 2015

Case 3:12-cv-06441-JST Document 230 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Oppositions to dispositive and Daubert motions December 14, 2015

Replies in support of dispositive and Daubert motions December 21, 2015

Hearing on dispositive and Daubert motions January 19, 2016

Pretrial conference April 29, 2016 at 

2:00 p.m.

Trial May 31, 2016 at 8:30 

a.m.

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2015

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:12-cv-06441-JST Document 230 Filed 05/01/15 Page 2 of 2