Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05099/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05099-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

A/72330801.1/2000047-0000328979 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING THE CMC 

AND EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO ANSWER/RESPOND (Case No. C 07-5099 (EMC))

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

ROBERT A. LEWIS (SBN 83630) 

robert.lewis@bingham.com 

ALAN R. BERKOWITZ (SBN 50112) 

alan.berkowitz@bingham.com 

BRYAN E. DALEY (SBN 227517) 

bryan.daley@bingham.com 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 

Telephone: 415.393.2000 

Facsimile: 415.393.2286 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Claudia Rockseth-Shipman 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JLT AEROSPACE (NORTH AMERICA), INC., 

a corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CLAUDIA ROCKSETH-SHIPMAN, 

Defendant. 

No. C 07-5099 (JSW) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT’S 

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN 

ORDER CONTINUING THE PARTIES’ 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

AND EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S 

DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR 

OTHERWISE RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

(N.D. Cal. Local Rule 6-2; FRCP 6(b)) 

Case 3:07-cv-05099-JSW Document 16 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:07-cv-05099-JSW Document 17 Filed 01/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

A/72330801.1/2000047-0000328979 2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING THE CMC 

AND EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO ANSWER/RESPOND (Case No. C 07-5099 (EMC))

For good cause shown, the Court HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiff and Defendant’s 

Stipulated Request for an Order Continuing the Parties’ Case Management Conference and 

Extending Defendant’s Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

Accordingly, the operative deadlines in this matter are as follows: 

Activity Date 

Defendant’s Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

January 25, 2008 

Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report covering topics set forth in 

the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of 

California 

February 8, 2008 

Initial Case Management Conference February 15, 2008 at 1:30 

p.m. 

APPROVED AS TO FORM 

DATED: January 14, 2008 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

By: /s/ Bryan E. Daley 

Bryan E. Daley 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Claudia Rockseth-Shipman 

bryan.daley@bingham.com 

DATED: January 14, 2008 COOK | ROOS | WILBUR | THOMPSON LLP 

By: /s/ Susan H. Roos 

Susan H. Roos 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JLT Aerospace (North America), Inc. 

sroos@cookroos.com 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: January , 2008 ______________________________________ 

Hon. James Larson 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-05099-JSW Document 16 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 2 of 3

Hon. Jeffrey S. White 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 15

Case 3:07-cv-05099-JSW Document 17 Filed 01/15/08 Page 2 of 2