Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00205/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00205-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUADALUPE ARREDONDO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0205 FCD GGH P

vs.

DERRICK MARTIN, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed April 4, 2007, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and

thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was re-served with

this order to his most current address on June 1, 2007. The thirty day period has now expired,

and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s

order. 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. 

See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:07-cv-00205-FCD-GGH Document 11 Filed 09/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d

1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 9/6/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

arre0205.fta

Case 2:07-cv-00205-FCD-GGH Document 11 Filed 09/06/07 Page 2 of 2