Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-00468/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-00468-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

Rodarte v. ALAMEDA COUNTY et al./USDC Case No. 4:14-cv-00468-KAW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAN SIEGEL, ESQ. (SBN 56400) 

KEVIN J. BRUNNER, ESQ. (SBN 271510) 

SIEGEL & YEE 

499 14th St, Suite 300 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 839-1200 

Facsimile: (510) 444-6698 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JUVENTINO RODARTE 

GREGORY B. THOMAS, ESQ. (239870) 

gthomas@bjg.com 

LAUREN O. MILLER, ESQ. (279448) 

lmiller@bjg.com 

BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 

A Professional Corporation 

555 12th Street, Suite 1800 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Telephone: (510) 834-4350 

Facsimile: (510) 839-1897 

Attorneys for Defendants 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, GREGORY J. AHERN, 

RAYMOND P. KELLY, and DEREK D. THOMS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JUVENTINO RODARTE, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ALAMEDA COUNTY, a public entity; 

GREGORY J. AHERN, Alameda County 

Sheriff sued in his individual capacity; 

RAYMOND P. KELLY, Alameda County 

Deputy Sheriff’s Sergeant sued in his 

individual capacity; DEREK D. THOMS, 

Alameda County Deputy Sheriff, sued in his 

individual capacity. 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 4:14-cv-00468-KAW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING FOR 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Judge: Kandis A. Westmore 

Case Filed: January 31, 2014 

Trial Date: October 19, 2015 

Jury Trial Demanded 

Case 4:14-cv-00468-KAW Document 70 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 3
2

Rodarte v. ALAMEDA COUNTY et al./USDC Case No. 4:14-cv-00468-KAW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendants COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (sued herein as “Alameda County”), GREGORY J. 

AHERN, RAYMOND P. KELLY, and the DEREK D. THOMS (collectively “Defendants”) 

filed a motion for summary judgment which is currently set for hearing on August 6, 2015 at 

11:00 a.m. (Dkt. No. 56.) Recently, all parties have agreed that a second Mandatory Settlement 

Conference before Magistrate Judge Beeler would be beneficial and may result in a global 

settlement, obviating the need for a hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. 

 On July 23, 2015, Magistrate Judgment Beeler held a telephone conference with all 

counsel to discuss setting a second Mandatory Settlement Conference. During that telephone 

conference, all parties agreed to schedule a second Mandatory Settlement Conference and 

tentatively agreed to participate in a second Mandatory Settlement Conference on August 17, 

2015, depending upon whether Magistrate Judge Beeler’s calendar becomes available on that 

date, as expected. If not, the parties will reconvene to reschedule a second Mandatory Settlement 

Conference on the first available mutually convenient date. The parties further agreed that the 

hearing on Defendants’ pending Motion for Summary Judgment should be continued to a date 

after the second Mandatory Settlement Conference, currently tentatively scheduled on 

August 17, 2015. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties and the parties 

jointly request that the Court continue the Motion for Summary Judgment to September 3, 2015, 

or the Court’s first available date thereafter. 

DATED: July 23, 2015 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 SIEGEL & YEE 

 By: /s/ Kevin J. Brunner 

 Kevin J. Brunner, Esq. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 JUVENTINO RODARTE 

Case 4:14-cv-00468-KAW Document 70 Filed 07/27/15 Page 2 of 3
3

Rodarte v. ALAMEDA COUNTY et al./USDC Case No. 4:14-cv-00468-KAW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: July 23, 2015 

BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 

A Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Gregory B. Thomas 

GREGORY J. ROCKWELL, ESQ. 

GREGORY B. THOMAS, ESQ. 

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY 

OF ALAMEDA, GREGORY J. 

AHERN, RAYMOND P. KELLY, 

and DEREK D. THOMS 

27382\695778 

 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the Hearing for Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 

56.) is continued from Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. to Thursday, 

September 3, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California. 

DATED: 

By: 

HON. KANDIS A. WESTMORE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

7/27/15

Case 4:14-cv-00468-KAW Document 70 Filed 07/27/15 Page 3 of 3