Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05370/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05370-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

&52:(//

	 025,1*//3

$77251(<6$7/$:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 13-CV-05370 

Beatrice B. Nguyen (CSB No. 172961)

 bbnguyen@crowell.com 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: 415.986.2800 

Facsimile: 415.986.2827 

Matthew J. McBurney (pro hoc vice) 

 mmcburney@crowell.com 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Telephone: 202.624.2500 

Facsimile: 202.628.5116 

Attorneys for Plaintiff HP Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS

This document relates to: 

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Toshiba Corp., et 

al., No. 3:13-cv-05370-RS 

Case No. 3:13-cv-05370-RS 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Hon. Richard Seeborg 

Case 3:13-cv-05370-RS Document 83 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 4
&52:(//

	 025,1*//3

$77251(<6$7/$:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

-2- 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 13-CV-05370 

Plaintiff HP Inc. (“HP”), formerly known as Hewlett-Packard Company, and Defendants 

Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America (collectively, “Panasonic”), 

by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to 

Panasonic with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. Except as otherwise agreed to or ordered by the Court, each party shall bear its own 

costs and attorneys’ fees. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of HP against any 

other defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 24, 2016 CROWELL & MORING LLP 

By: /s/ Beatrice B. Nguyen

Beatrice B. Nguyen 

Matthew J. McBurney 

Attorneys for Plaintiff HP Inc. 

Dated: October 24, 2016 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Kessler

Jeffrey L. Kessler 

George E. Mastoris 

Winston & Strawn LLP 

200 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10166 

E-mail: jkessler@winston.com 

gmastoris@winston.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic 

Corporation of North America 

Case 3:13-cv-05370-RS Document 83 Filed 10/28/16 Page 2 of 4
&52:(//

	 025,1*//3

$77251(<6$7/$:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

-3- 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 13-CV-05370 

FILER ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the 

United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Beatrice B. Nguyen, hereby 

attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 

signatories. 

Dated: October 24, 2016 CROWELL & MORING LLP 

By: /s/ Beatrice B. Nguyen

Beatrice B. Nguyen 

Attorneys for Plaintiff HP Inc.

 

Case 3:13-cv-05370-RS Document 83 Filed 10/28/16 Page 3 of 4
&52:(//

	 025,1*//3

$77251(<6$7/$:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

-4- 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 13-CV-05370 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

Honorable Richard G. Seeborg 

United States District Judge 

 

10/28/16

Case 3:13-cv-05370-RS Document 83 Filed 10/28/16 Page 4 of 4