Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-05415/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-05415-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5:15-cv-05415-LHK

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO 

MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

RITA ACOSTA, BESSIE TAYLOR, VAN 

GRESHAM, CHERIE HERNANDEZ, JOHN 

LERMA, JOSEPH BLAINS, AND WILLIAM 

SILAS,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF SALINAS,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-CV-05415-LHK

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE 

REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION 

TO MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION

Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh

Courtroom: 8

Hearing Date: March 3, 2016

Time: 1:30 p.m.

BRADLEY S. PHILLIPS (SBN 85263)

brad.phillips@mto.com

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

355 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, California 90071-1560

Telephone: (213) 683-9100

Facsimile: (213) 687-3702

JOSHUA S. MELTZER (SBN 291641)

joshua.meltzer@mto.com

JOHN B. MAJOR (SBN 306416)

john.major@mto.com

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

560 Mission Street

Twenty-Seventh Floor

San Francisco, California 94105-2907

Telephone: (415) 512-4000

Facsimile: (415) 512-4077

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ANTHONY D. PRINCE (SBN 202892)

anthonyd.princelaw@yahoo.com

Law Offices of Anthony D. Prince

2425 Prince Street

Berkeley, CA 94705

Telephone: (510) 301-1472

MARK D. ROSENBAUM (SBN 59940)

mrosenbaum@publiccounsel.org

GARY BLASI (SBN 70190)

gblasi@publiccounsel.org

ANNE RICHARDSON (SBN 151541)

arichardson@publiccounsel.org

ALISA HARTZ (SBN 285141)

ahartz@publiccounsel.org

PUBLIC COUNSEL LAW CENTER

610 S. Ardmore Avenue

Los Angeles, California 90005

Telephone: (213) 385-2977

Facsimile: (213) 385-9089

Case 5:15-cv-05415-LHK Document 20 Filed 01/13/16 Page 1 of 5 Case 5:15-cv-05415-NC Document 23 Filed 01/14/16 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

-1- 5:15-cv-05415-LHK

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO 

MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby stipulate to this request that 

the Court enter an order extending Plaintiffs’ time to file its reply to Defendant’s Opposition to 

Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 13) until January 19, 2016. Good cause exists for the 

extension, no prior extensions have been granted in this case, and the extension should not affect 

the currently scheduled hearing date.

RECITALS

1. Plaintiff filed its Motion for a Preliminary Injunction on December 22, 2015. Dkt. 13. 

The motion was served on Defendant City of Salinas by mail on the same day. Dkt. 13-23.

2. Defendant’s opposition would normally have been due two weeks later, on January 5, 

2016. But, because the motion for a preliminary injunction was served by mail, the parties 

conferred and agreed that Local Rule 7-3 granted Defendant an automatic three-day extension 

within which to file its opposition, making the opposition due on January 8, 2016.

3. On January 8, 2016, the parties entered into a stipulation in which Plaintiffs agreed not 

to move to advance the hearing date on the motion for a preliminary injunction to earlier than 

March 3, 2016. In return, Defendant agreed not to enforce Ordinance No. 2564 or otherwise 

conduct cleanups prior to March 3, 2016. Dkt. 19.

4. Defendant filed its opposition to the motion for a preliminary injunction on January 8, 

2016. Dkt. 17. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(c), Plaintiffs’ reply would be due on January 15, 2016.

5. On January 12, 2016, the parties conferred and agreed to request an order extending the 

time for Plaintiffs to file their reply to Defendant’s opposition. The parties agreed to an extension 

until January 19, 2016.

6. Good cause exists for the extension. Defendant’s opposition included a number of 

declarations and other evidence, and Plaintiffs are considering how to respond to that evidence. 

Declaration of John B. Major (“Major Decl.”), ¶ 2.

7. Neither Plaintiffs nor Defendant have previously requested an extension of time in this 

case. Major Decl. ¶ 3.

8. The motion for a preliminary injunction is scheduled for hearing on March 3, 2016. 

Even with the extension of time, the Court will have more than six weeks to review the complete 

Case 5:15-cv-05415-LHK Document 20 Filed 01/13/16 Page 2 of 5 Case 5:15-cv-05415-NC Document 23 Filed 01/14/16 Page 2 of 5
1 briefing in advance of the hearing, so the extension should not affect the currently scheduled 

2 hearing. Major Deel. ~ 4. 

3 STIPULATION 

4 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the parties hereby stipulate to a request for an order granting 

5 Plaintiffs a four-day extension, until January 19, 2016, within which to file their reply. The 

6 hearing on the motion would remain as previously scheduled, on March 3, 2016, at 1 :30 p.m. 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DATED: January 13, 2016 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

BRADLEY S. PHILLIPS 

JOSHUA S. MELTZER 

JOHN B. MAJOR 

PUBLIC COUNSEL 

By: 

MARK ROSENBAUM 

GARY BLASI 

ANNE RICHARDSON 

ALISA HARTZ 

ANNE RICHARDSON 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

-2- 5:15-cv-05415-LHK 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO 

MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

Case 5:15-cv-05415-LHK Document 20 Filed 01/13/16 Page 3 of 5 Case 5:15-cv-05415-NC Document 23 Filed 01/14/16 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LAW OFFlCES OF ANTHONY D. PRINCF. 

ANTHONY D. PRINCE 

By: 

ANTHONY D. PRINCE 

CHRISTOPHER A. CALLIHAN 

CITY ATTORNEY 

Attorney for Defendant 

CITY OF SALINAS 

-3- 5: 15-cv-054 15-LHK 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO 

MOTION FOR A PRELlMTNARY TNJUNCTJON 

Case 5:15-cv-05415-LHK Document 20 Filed 01/13/16 Page 4 of 5 Case 5:15-cv-05415-NC Document 23 Filed 01/14/16 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

-4- 5:15-cv-05415-LHK

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO 

MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation to extend time for Plaintiffs to file their reply to 

Defendant’s opposition, Plaintiffs’ reply is now due on January 19, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

Judge Lucy H. Koh

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-05415-LHK Document 20 Filed 01/13/16 Page 5 of 5

January 14, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-05415-NC Document 23 Filed 01/14/16 Page 5 of 5