Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04165/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04165-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JACK LOUMENA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PAMELA KENNEDY, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 14-cv-04165-LHK 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 

Re: Dkt. No. 3 

Plaintiff Jack Loumena filed a complaint in this Court on September 16, 2014. ECF No. 1. 

On November 3, 2014, defendants Walter Hammon and Travis Krepelka filed a Motion to 

Dismiss and Request for Judicial Notice, arguing that Plaintiff’s lawsuit fails to state a claim under 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 and is barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. ECF Nos. 3, 5. Pursuant to Civil 

Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss was due on November 17, 

2014.1

 As of today, February 5, 2015, Plaintiff has not filed an Opposition or Statement of 

Nonopposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 

The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed 

for failure to prosecute. This Order does not authorize Plaintiff to file an untimely Opposition to 

 1

 The Court renoticed the motion on November 20, 2014, after this case was reassigned to 

the undersigned. ECF No. 19. The hearing on the motion was renoticed for March 12, 2015, at 

1:30 p.m. Id. The briefing schedule, however, remained unchanged. Id.

Case 5:14-cv-04165-LHK Document 20 Filed 02/04/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff has until February 18, 2015, to file a written response to 

this Order to Show Cause. 

Plaintiff’s failure to respond to this Order will result in dismissal with prejudice for failure 

to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 4, 2015 

______________________________________ 

LUCY H. KOH 

United States District Judge 

Case 5:14-cv-04165-LHK Document 20 Filed 02/04/15 Page 2 of 2