Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-02232/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-02232-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING 

CASE NO: C 03-02232 JF 

SFCA_395869.2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

ONE MARITIME PLAZA, SIXTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3409 

TELEPHONE: 415.434.4484 

FACSIMILE: 415.434.4507 

NANCY J. GEENEN CA BAR NO. 135968 

NGEENEN@FOLEY.COM

KIMBERLY K. DODD CA BAR NO. 235109 

KDODD@FOLEY.COM

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ROCKWELL SOFTWARE INC. AND 

THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

SYSTEMS AMERICA INC. and SYSTEMS 

AMERICA (I) PVT. LTD. 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

ROCKWELL SOFTWARE INC. 

Defendant. 

Case No: C 03-02232 JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING 

ON VERSANT CORPORATION’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO 

F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) 

ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. 

Third-Party Plaintiff, 

vs. 

VERSANT CORPORATION 

Third-Party Defendant. 

DATE: 

TIME: 

DEPARTMENT: 

JUDGE: 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2006 

9:00 A.M. 

3 

HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL

WHEREAS Rockwell Automation, Inc. (“Rockwell”) filed a Third-Party Complaint 

against Versant Corporation (“Versant”) on June 26, 2006; 

WHEREAS Versant filed a motion to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint on 

August 8, 2006 (Dkt. #72-1) alleging that the Third-Party Complaint fails to allege a legallycognizable foundation to seek indemnification from Versant because neither the Third-Party 

Complaint nor the Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Systems America Inc. and Systems America (I) 

**E-filed 9/11/06**

Case 5:03-cv-02232-JF Document 75 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING 

CASE NO: C 03-02232 JF 

SFCA_395869.2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pvt. Ltd. (collectively “Systems America”) allege actionable conduct by Versant; 

WHEREAS the hearing on Versant’s motion to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint is 

scheduled for September 22, 2006 (Dkt. #73); 

WHEREAS Systems America has indicated that it intends to amend its Complaint; 

WHEREAS the allegations in Systems America’s Amended Complaint may impact the 

arguments raised in Versant’s motion to dismiss; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties that the hearing on 

Versant’s motion to dismiss be continued to October 13, 2006. 

DATED: August 31, 2006 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

NANCY J. GEENEN

KIMBERLY K. DODD

By: _______/s/____________________________

KIMBERLY K. DODD

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ROCKWELL

SOFTWARE INC. AND 

THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF ROCKWELL

AUTOMATION, INC. 

DATED: AUGUST 31, 2006 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

ANNETTE L. HURST 

ALEXANDER L. BRAINERD

LESLIE HARVEY

By: _______/s/____________________________

ANNETTE L. HURST

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS SYSTEMS AMERICA, INC.

AND SYSTEMS AMERICA (I) PVT. LTD. 

Case 5:03-cv-02232-JF Document 75 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 3
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING 

CASE NO: C 03-02232 JF 

SFCA_395869.2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DATED: AUGUST 31, 2006 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

RODGER R. COLE 

SAUNDRA L.M. RILEY

RACHEL G. SAMBERG

By: _______/s/____________________________

RODGER R. COLE

ATTORNEYS FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT VERSANT 

CORPORATION

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ___________________________ _________________________________________ 

HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN 

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9/11/06

Case 5:03-cv-02232-JF Document 75 Filed 09/11/06 Page 3 of 3