Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05671/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05671-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

{00438926.DOCX} 3:13-cv-05671-WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ERROR ON DEPOSITION READ-IN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

Marsha J. Chien, State Bar No. 275238 

Christopher Ho, State Bar No. 129845 

THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY –

 EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 

180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 864-8848 

Facsimile: (415) 593-0096 

E-mail: mchien@las-elc.org 

 cho@las-elc.org 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

VICTOR GUERRERO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTOR GUERRERO,

 Plaintiff,

v. 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; 

STATE PERSONNEL BOARD; and, in their 

official capacities, JEFFREY BEARD, 

Secretary of the California Department of 

Corrections and Rehabilitation; SUZANNE 

AMBROSE, Executive Officer of State 

Personnel Board; K. CARROLL, Lieutenant; 

D. SHARP, Sergeant; BARBARA 

LEASHORE, Hearing Officer; C. HESTER, 

Lieutenant; V. MAYOL, Lieutenant; S. COX, 

Lieutenant; V. MYERS, Sergeant; JOHN (OR 

JANE) DOES 1-100, all of whose names are 

unknown,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:13-cv-05671-WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE ERROR ON DEPOSITION 

READ-IN

Trial Date: June 15, 2015

Time: 7:30 a.m. 

Ctrm: 8 (19th Floor)

[Hon. William Alsup]

Case 3:13-cv-05671-WHA Document 249 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 4
{00438926.DOCX} 1 3:13-cv-05671-WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ERROR ON DEPOSITION READ-IN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

STIPULATION 

On Monday, June 15, 2015, during the trial of this matter and in the course of reading 

from the deposition transcript of Barbara Leashore, counsel for Plaintiff inadvertently omitted a 

question and answer from that transcript. The omitted portion was later read into the record at 

178:21-23 of that day’s trial transcript. Exh. A to Declaration of Elizabeth Fulton (“Fulton 

Decl.”). The reporter noted this omitted portion, as well as the discussion thereon between 

counsel and the Court, on an index page of the June 15 trial transcript (67:14). Exh. B to Fulton 

Decl. The Court subsequently directed the parties to meet and confer with respect to a 

stipulation that would identify and rectify this error in the read-in. 

The parties hereby stipulate that the omitted portion (178:21-23) be treated as if it had 

been read between lines 16 and 17 on page 173 of the June 15 trial transcript, Exh. C to Fulton 

Decl., so as to accurately track the deposition of Ms. Leashore. 

This stipulation is submitted jointly by all the parties to this action. In compliance with 

Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing 

of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-

12, a complete list of the parties is contained on the signature page of this document. A proposed 

order is appended herewith. 

DATED: June 23, 2015 Marsha J. Chien

 Christopher Ho 

LEGAL AID SOCIETY- EMPLOYMENT 

LAW CENTER

 

By: /s/ Marsha J. Chien 

 MARSHA J. CHIEN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 3:13-cv-05671-WHA Document 249 Filed 06/29/15 Page 2 of 4
{00438926.DOCX} 2 3:13-cv-05671-WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ERROR ON DEPOSITION READ-IN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

DATED: June 23, 2015 Alvin Gittisriboongul 

Dorothy Bacskai Egel 

STATE PERSONNEL BOARD 

By: /s/ .____

 DOROTHY BACSKAI EGEL 

Attorneys for SPB and SPB Individual 

Defendants 

DATED: June 23, 2015 Christopher M. Young 

Fiel D. Tigno 

Miguel A. Neri 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE 

 

By: /s/ ____________.

 Christopher M. Young 

Attorneys for CDCR and 

CDCR Individual Defendants 

Case 3:13-cv-05671-WHA Document 249 Filed 06/29/15 Page 3 of 4
{00438926.DOCX} 3 3:13-cv-05671-WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ERROR ON DEPOSITION READ-IN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. The June 15, 

2015 trial transcript shall be treated as if the matters appearing at 178:21-23 had instead been 

read in between lines 16 and 17 on page 173 of that transcript. 

Dated: June ____, 2015 ____________________________ 

 WILLIAM ALSUP

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

29

Case 3:13-cv-05671-WHA Document 249 Filed 06/29/15 Page 4 of 4