Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-4_05-cv-04048/USCOURTS-arwd-4_05-cv-04048-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

BLANCHE F. CROW PLAINTIFF

vs. Civil No. 05-4048

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Now on this 18th day of April, 2006, there is pending before the undersigned, the

Commissioner’s Motion To Remand, filed herein on November 2, 2005, by the Commissioner

of Social Security (hereinafter "Commissioner") (Doc. #7). Despite ample time to do so,

Plaintiff has not responded to the Commissioner’s motion. This matter is now ready for

consideration.

In the instant motion, the Commissioner asserts that reversal of her decision, and remand

of this matter, are necessary to ensure that the administrative law judge (ALJ): reassess

Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity (RFC); reevaluate the effect of any nonexertional

limitations on Plaintiff’s RFC; obtain vocational expert testimony on the impact of Plaintiff’s

limitations on her ability to do past relevant work or other work; and, reevaluate Plaintiff’s

subjective complaints (Doc. #7, pp. 1-2). 

Sentence four provides:

The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and

transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or

reversing the decision of the [Commissioner], with or without

remanding the cause for a rehearing.

42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Case 4:05-cv-04048-BES Document 8 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

-2-

Accordingly, we conclude that the Commissioner’s motion requesting reversal of the

decision and remand, is well taken. The Commissioner’s decision is reversed and this matter is

remanded for further hearing, pursuant to sentence four, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further

proceedings, as specifically set forth above and in the Commissioner’s motion (Doc. #7).

In addition, the undersigned finds that the Plaintiff’s Complaint should be and hereby is

dismissed without prejudice to the subsequent filing for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal

Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. A separate Judgment shall be entered herein pursuant

to F.R.Civ.P. 58 and 52.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Bobby E. Shepherd 

Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 4:05-cv-04048-BES Document 8 Filed 04/18/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>