Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06736/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06736-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMMY BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 04 6736 REC WMW P

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER JUDGMENT

FOR DEFENDANTS (Doc. 12)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302. 

 On August 2, 2005, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending

dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff

was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the findings and

recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to

keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(d),

service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

Case 1:04-cv-06736-REC-WMW Document 14 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

proper analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on August

2, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk

is directed to enter judgment for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 23, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06736-REC-WMW Document 14 Filed 09/26/05 Page 2 of 2