Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05439/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05439-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRIS EDDIE GREENE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MILES, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05439-AWI-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 32)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 30)

Plaintiff, Chris Eddie Greene (“plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On November 7, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that recommended plaintiff’s motion for summary

judgment be denied for plaintiff’s failure to comply with

procedural rules. The Findings and Recommendations were served

on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed

within thirty (30) days. 

Case 1:04-cv-05439-AWI-LJO Document 49 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On December 5, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Plaintiff’s

objections do not compel the court to not adopt the Findings and

Recommendations and grant plaintiff’s motion for summary

judgment. Plaintiff remains free to file a motion for summary

judgment that comports with the Local Rules and the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 7,

2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed October

31, 2005, is DENIED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 14, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05439-AWI-LJO Document 49 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2