Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05710/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05710-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on March 14, 2005, as

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated, “Paroled.” Therefore, on April 13, 2005, the court re-served

plaintiff with the F&R at 508 Ashlan Way, Madera, CA, 93637. Plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in

his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STYLLS MILES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MADERA PAROLE OFFICERS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05710-REC-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 11)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Stylls Miles (“plaintiff”), a former state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this

civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On February 24, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.1

Case 1:04-cv-05710-REC-LJO Document 14 Filed 05/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 24,

2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for

plaintiff’s failure to state any claims upon which relief may be

granted under section 1983.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 23, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05710-REC-LJO Document 14 Filed 05/25/05 Page 2 of 2