Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01754/USCOURTS-ca4-19-01754-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1473

CAROL J. TACCINO; WILLIAM A. TACCINO,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

FORD MOTOR CO.; DIEHL’S FORD SALES, INC.; WEPCO F.C.U.; CHESSIE 

F.C.U.; BB&T COMPANY; CAPITAL ONE, INC.; NORTHWEST 

BANCSHARES, INC.; ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC; MARINER 

FINANCE, LLC,

 Defendants - Appellees,

v.

ALLY FINANCIAL, INC.,

 

 Defendant.

No. 19-1754

CAROL J. TACCINO; WILLIAM A. TACCINO,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

ALLY FINANCIAL, INC.; CAPITAL ONE, INC.,

 Defendants - Appellees,

and

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1754 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/07/2020 Pg: 1 of 3
2

FORD MOTOR CO.; DIEHL’S FORD SALES, INC.; WEPCO F.C.U.; CHESSIE 

F.C.U.; BB&T COMPANY; NORTHWEST BANCSHARES, INC.; ONEMAIN 

FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC; MARINER FINANCE, LLC,

 Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00913-GLR)

Submitted: December 20, 2019 Decided: January 7, 2020

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carol J. Taccino, William A. Taccino, Appellants Pro Se. Grant A. Newman, BUSH 

SEYFERTH & PAIGE PLLC, Troy, Michigan; Gregory Stephen Emrick, Matthew James 

McCloskey, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland; Michael K. 

Hourigan, FERGUSON, SCHETELICH & BALLEW, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; George 

Faulkner Ritchie, IV, GORDON FEINBLATT LLC, Baltimore, Maryland; Richard Marc 

Goldberg, Anastasia L. McCusker, SHAPIRO SHER GUINOT & SANDLER, Baltimore, 

Maryland; Ezra S. Gollogly, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1754 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/07/2020 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Carol J. Taccino and William A. Taccino appeal the district court’s orders granting 

Defendants’ motions to dismiss their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Taccino v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1:18-cv-00913-GLR (D. Md. June 14 & Mar. 29, 2019). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 19-1754 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/07/2020 Pg: 3 of 3