Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04181/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04181-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK OTTOVICH, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CITY OF FREMONT, et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-09-4181 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF

DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On January 7, 2010, plaintiffs electronically filed their Second Amended Complaint. 

Plaintiffs have violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by

failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the

day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name,

case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also

Standing Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Plaintiffs are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply with General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each

electronically-filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to,

Case 3:09-cv-04181-MMC Document 21 Filed 01/14/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-04181-MMC Document 21 Filed 01/14/10 Page 2 of 2