Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-02579/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-02579-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RICHARD L. KELLNER, SBN 171416 

FRANK E. MARCHETTI, SBN 203185 

KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP 

350 South Grand Avenue, 39th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071-3801 

Telephone: (213) 217-5000 

Facsimile: (213) 217-5010 

DARREN T. KAPLAN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

GREGORY E. KELLER (To be admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

CHITWOOD HARLEY HARNES LLP 

2300 Promenade II 

1230 Peachtree Street, NE 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309 

Telephone: (404) 873-3900 

Facsimile: (404) 876-4476 

SHAWN KHORRAMI, SBN 180411 

LAW OFFICES OF SHAWN KHORRAMI 

14550 Haynes Street, Third Floor 

Van Nuys, California 91411 

Telephone: (818) 947-5111 

Facsimile: (818) 947-5121 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ADVANCED INTERNET TECHNOLOGIES,

INC., a North Carolina corporation, 

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

STEVE MIZERA, an Individual, individually 

and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, 

 Defendants 

Case No. C 05 02579 RMW 

Consolidated with 

Case No. C 05 02885 RMW 

 ORDER 

Date: January 13, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte 

Case 5:05-cv-02579-RMW Document 40 Filed 04/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

On January 13, 2006, the Court heard plaintiff Click Defense, Inc’s (“Click Defense’s”) 

Motion for leave to (1) withdraw as representative plaintiff of the putative class; (2) discontinue 

its individual claims against defendant Google, Inc. (“Google”) without prejudice; (3) substitute 

Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc. (“AIT”) for Click Defense as representative plaintiff of the 

putative class; and (4) amend the caption accordingly. Having considered the parties’ arguments 

and submissions, the Court orders as follows: 

1. Click Defense’s motion is GRANTED. AIT shall be substituted for Click 

Defense as the named plaintiff and putative class representative. The caption shall be amended 

accordingly. 

2. Click Defense shall produce documents in response to one set of requests for 

production served by Google, and produce a witness or witnesses for one seven-hour deposition 

on topics noticed by Google. Google’s requests for production and deposition notice shall be 

narrowly tailored. This Court will retain jurisdiction to resolve any disputes relating to this 

discovery. 

3. After Click Defense produces the documents and testifies at deposition as set 

forth in the preceding paragraph, if Google desires any additional discovery from Click Defense, 

it must serve a subpoena under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. This Court expresses no opinion on the 

propriety of any such additional discovery. 

4. The Court declines to order at this time that plaintiffs’ counsel must make a 

showing of good cause if they seek to change class representatives again. The Court will decide 

any such motion, including what showing plaintiffs’ counsel must make, if and when such a 

motion is presented. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

By: ________________________

RONALD M. WHYTE 

United States District Judge 

[] ORDER 

Case No. C 05 02579 RMW 

Case 5:05-cv-02579-RMW Document 40 Filed 04/06/06 Page 2 of 2