Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02481/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02481-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lowe’s HIW, Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Thomas James Civil Design Group 

Inc., et al., 

Defendants. 

And Related Counterclaims,

And Related Cross-Claims.

_________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-2481-PHX-SMM

FINAL ORDER

Pursuant to a settlement agreement, pending before the Court is Plaintiff Lowe’s HIW,

Inc. (“Lowe’s”) and Defendants Ames Construction, Inc. (“Ames”), EMJ Corporation

(“EMJ”), and Mortimer, Inc.’s (“Mortimer”) stipulation to dismiss with prejudice the claims,

counterclaims and cross-claims asserted by and against these parties. (Doc. 915.) Also

pending is Defendant Mortimer’s Notice of Withdrawal of its Motion for Spoliation

Sanction. (Doc. 914.) The parties have advised the Court that these stipulations for

dismissal are the final ones to be submitted for approval and that the case is now ready to be

terminated. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the parties’ stipulations. (Doc. 915.) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice Lowe’s claims against

Case 2:09-cv-02481-SMM Document 917 Filed 08/27/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Defendants Ames, EMJ and Mortimer, with each of these parties to bear its own respective

costs and attorney’s fees. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice EMJ’s counterclaim against

Lowe’s, with each of these parties to bear its own respective costs and attorney’s fees

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice any remaining cross-claims

by or against Ames, EMJ and Mortimer with each of these parties to bear its own respective

costs and attorney’s fees.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendant Mortimer’s Notice of Withdrawal

of its Motion for Spoliation Sanction. (Doc. 914.) Moritmer’s motion for spoliation sanction

is hereby withdrawn and denied as moot. (Doc. 899.) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Lowe’s motion to confirm

assignment and trial in the Phoenix division. (Doc. 866.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall terminate this action.

DATED this 26th day of August, 2013.

Case 2:09-cv-02481-SMM Document 917 Filed 08/27/13 Page 2 of 2