Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00286/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00286-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Victor M. Padilla, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Bechtel Construction Company, a Nevada

corporation; Carpenters Local 408, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-286-PCT-LOA

ORDER

This matter arises on the Court's review of Richard M. Grimsrud's Notice of

Compliance by Plaintiff's counsel, filed on March 15, 2007, which includes an attached

Affidavit by Plaintiff under penalty of perjury, also dated March 15, 2007, indicating that

Plaintiff received the Court's 13-page February 27, 2007 Order. (docket # 54) The Court

deems Grimsrud's Notice of Compliance to also be a Response to Order to Show Cause

mandated in this Court's March 14, 2007 OSC.

Although it is another untimely filed document, Grimsrud's Notice of Compliance

verifies that Grimsrud timely provided his client a complete copy of the Court's February 27,

2007 Order which warned Plaintiff and Grimsrud of the potential for adverse consequences

to Plaintiff's case due to "Plaintiff's counsel['s] failure to timely respond to any motion or a

failure to timely comply with any order, Rule of Procedure or Local Rule . . . ." (docket # 50

at 4) Having made its point to Plaintiff and his attorney, the Court determines that going

forward with the OSC in Phoenix with this Flagstaff lawyer is unnecessary and an

Case 2:06-cv-00286-LOA Document 55 Filed 03/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

unreasonably harsh for arguably a de minimus violation of the Court order and Grimsrud's

prompt response to the OSC.

IT IS ORDERED that the Court's March 26, 2007 OSC evidentiary hearing is

hereby VACATED and the OSC is hereby DISCHARGED.

 DATED this 15th day of March, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00286-LOA Document 55 Filed 03/15/07 Page 2 of 2