Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00652/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00652-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL A. GOMEZ, 1:05-CV-00652-OWW-TAG-HC

Petitioner,

vs. ORDER VACATING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

 HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 11)

THE PEOPLE, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AS MOOT (Doc. 13)

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On May 4, 2005, Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition. (Doc. 1). On May 24,

2005, the Court issued an order requiring Petitioner to pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action, or

submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, within thirty days from the date of service of that

order. (Doc. 7). On July 5, 2005, after more than thirty days had passed during which Petitioner had

failed to comply with or otherwise respond to the Court’s order, the Court issued a Report and

Recommendation that the petition be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Doc. 11). The Report and

Recommendation gave all parties thirty days within which to file objections. (Id.). On July 29,

Case 1:05-cv-00652-LJO -TAG Document 14 Filed 08/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

2005, Petitioner paid the five dollar filing fee. Subsequently, Petitioner also filed a motion to

proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 13). 

Because Petitioner has now complied with the Court’s order, the Report and

Recommendation of July 5, 2005 will be vacated. Moreover, because Petitioner has paid the filing

fee, his motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied as moot.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of July 5, 2005 (Doc. 11), is VACATED; and

2. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 13), is DENIED as MOOT. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 13, 2005 /s/ Theresa A. Goldner 

j6eb3d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00652-LJO -TAG Document 14 Filed 08/15/05 Page 2 of 2