Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01991/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01991-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REYNALDA MOLINA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF VISALIA, et. al.

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-01991-LJO-SAB

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT 

BE STRICKEN

(ECF No. 40)

SEVEN DAY DEADLINE

On May 8, 2014, an order issued granting the parties stipulation and allowing Plaintiff to 

file a second amended complaint by June 14, 2014. (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff did not file an 

amended complaint or request an extension of time to file the amended complaint. On June 20, 

2014, Plaintiff filed an untimely second amended complaint. Within seven (7) days from the 

date of service of this order, Plaintiff is required to show cause why the second amended 

complaint should not be stricken for failure to comply with the May 8, 2014 order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 23, 2014 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01991-DAD-SAB Document 41 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 1