Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00010/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00010-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

_______ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MAY 10, 2010 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rosy H. Cho, CBN 175704 

Law Office of Rosy H. Cho 

405 Sansome Street, Suite 400 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 274-9920 

Facsimile: (415) 781-6683 

e-mail: rosy@rosycholaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION 

NAGEEB KASSEM AND NORA 

KASSEM, 

 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

JANET NAPOLITANO, et al., 

Defendants 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 1:08-cv-00010 AWI_SMS 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 

MAY 10, 2010 SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE AND ORDER 

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties and their respective 

counsel, Rosy H. Cho, attorney for Plaintiffs Nageeb Kassem and Nora Kassem, Aram A. 

Gavoor, attorney for Defendants, that: 

WHEREAS, the Court has set a Scheduling Conference in the above-entitled 

action for May 10, 2010; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel has just been retained and has not yet received 

Plaintiffs’ file from their former counsel, Bruce Leichty; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel needs additional time to review the long history of 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:08-cv-00010-AWI -SMS Document 95 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 2
_______ STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MAY 10, 2010 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

this matter; 

NOW, THEREFORE, counsel for the parties hereby stipulate and request that the 

Court enter an order as follows: 

1. The Scheduling Conference shall be continued from May 10, 2010 for at 

least 60 days, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court. 

The parties respectfully request that the Court approve this Stipulation. 

Dated: April 29, 2010 By: /s/ Rosy H. Cho

Rosy H. Cho, Esq. 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: April 29, 2010 By: /s/ Aram A. Gavoor

Aram A. Gavoor, Esq. 

Attorney for Defendants 

ORDER

The above stipulation by the parties is hereby approved by the Court. 

The Telephonic Scheduling Conference hearing is continued from May 10, 2010 to July 

20, 2010 at 9:15 a.m. before Judge Snyder in Courtroom #7. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 4, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:08-cv-00010-AWI -SMS Document 95 Filed 05/05/10 Page 2 of 2