Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02448/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02448-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL E. GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT (BUREAU) OF REAL 

ESTATE, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-2448 GEB GGH PS

ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per and in forma pauperis. The matter was 

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On October 12, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff 

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 25.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

////

Case 2:15-cv-02448-TLN-KJN Document 29 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 12, 2016, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s “ex Parte application for a stay or temporary injunction on a pending state 

action,” filed September 19, 2016, (ECF No. 16) is denied. 

Dated: November 16, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-02448-TLN-KJN Document 29 Filed 11/17/16 Page 2 of 2