Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00898/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00898-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Stipulation to Continue Hearing on C/Stockton's Second MSA of Issues [2:02-CV-00898 RRB GGH] 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joseph M. Quinn (SBN: 171898) 

Ariana Mohit, Esq. (SBN: 211407) 

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 

575 Market, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 421-3711 

Facsimile: (415) 421-3767 

Richard E. Nosky, Jr., City Attorney (SBN: 130726) 

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 

425 N. El Dorado Street, 2nd Floor 

Stockton, CA 95202 

Telephone: (209) 937-8333 

Facsimile: (209) 937-8898 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF STOCKTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOAQUIN MOTEL AND HOTEL 

PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, et. al, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal 

corporation; and DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No: 2:02-CV-00898 RRB GGH 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 

HEARING ON CITY OF STOCKTON'S 

SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES 

Date: May 21, 2008 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Dept.: Courtroom 6 

Judge: Hon. Ralph R. Beistline 

Complaint Filed: April 24, 2002 

Trial Date: November 3, 2008 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-00898-JAM-GGH Document 200 Filed 04/15/08 Page 1 of 3
2 

Stipulation to Continue Hearing on C/Stockton's Second MSA of Issues [2:02-CV-00898 RRB GGH]

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the Court has continued the hearing on Defendant CITY OF STOCKTON'S 

("Defendant") Second Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues to May 7, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.; 

and 

WHEREAS, lead counsel for Defendant, Joseph M. Quinn, is unavailable on that date; and 

WHEREAS, the Court has graciously offered to reschedule the hearing to May 21st at 10:00 

a.m.; and 

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs SAN JOAQUIN MOTEL AND HOTEL PROPERTY 

OWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al. ("Plaintiffs") Frank A. Weiser, wishes to appear at the 

rescheduled hearing on Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Adjudication telephonically; 

Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree 

and stipulate as follows: 

1. The hearing on Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues 

shall be continued from May 7th at 10:00 a.m. to May 21st at 10:00 a.m.; and 

2. Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Adjudication of 

Issues shall be filed and served no later than close of business on April 9, 2008; 

3. Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Second Motion for 

Summary Adjudication of Issues shall be filed and served no later than close of business on April 

23, 2008; and 

4. Plaintiffs' counsel, Frank A. Weiser, respectfully requests permission to appear 

telephonically at the May 21, 2008 hearing on Defendant's Second Motion for Summary 

Adjudication of Issues. 

SO STIPULATED: 

DATED: April___, 2008 

By: _______________________________________ 

Frank A. Weiser, Esq. 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

/// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-00898-JAM-GGH Document 200 Filed 04/15/08 Page 2 of 3
3 

Stipulation to Continue Hearing on C/Stockton's Second MSA of Issues [2:02-CV-00898 RRB GGH]

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: April___, 2008 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 

By: _______________________________________ 

Ariana Mohit 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF STOCKTON 

 ORDER 

1. The hearing on Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues 

shall be continued from May 7th at 10:00 a.m. to May 21st at 10:00 a.m.; and 

2. Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Adjudication of 

Issues shall be filed and served no later than close of business on April 9, 2008; 

3. Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Second Motion for 

Summary Adjudication of Issues shall be filed and served no later than close of business on April 

23, 2008; and 

4. Plaintiffs' counsel’s request to appear telephonically at the May 21, 2008 hearing on

Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues will be determined at a later date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 15, 2008 /s/ Ralph R. Beistline__________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1079599.2 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-00898-JAM-GGH Document 200 Filed 04/15/08 Page 3 of 3