Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05297/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05297-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

Case No. C 07-05297 BZ

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Lisa M. Martens (SBN 195824) 

Andrew M. Abrams (SBN 229698) 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

12390 El Camino Real 

San Diego, California 92130 

Telephone: (858) 678-5070 

Facsimile: (858) 678-5099 

Attorneys for Defendant 

HOT TOPIC, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN JOSE) 

KAKU LAB CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOT TOPIC, INC., a California Corporation; 

and Does 1 through 20, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 07-05297 BZ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER 

COMPLAINT 

 The parties to this action, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree 

that the date for defendant Hot Topic, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint of 

plaintiff Kaku Lab Corporation, currently set for November 8, 2007, is extended to and including 

December 10, 2007. 

Dated: November 7, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/Lisa M. Martens 

 Lisa M. Martens 

Andrew M. Abrams 

Attorneys for Defendant 

HOT TOPIC, INC. 

Case 3:07-cv-05297-CRB Document 5 Filed 11/07/07 Page 1 of 3
2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

Case No. C 07-05297 BZ

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: November 7, 2007 SHAWN T. LEUTHOLD 

By: /s/Shawn T. Leuthold 

 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

KAKU LAB CORPORATION 

DECLARATION OF CONSENT.

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Shawn 

T. Luethold. 

Dated: November 7, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/Lisa M. Martens 

 Lisa M. Martens 

Andrew M. Abrams 

Attorneys for Defendant 

HOT TOPIC, INC. 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________________ _________________________________________ 

 Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman 

 Judge Of The United States District Court 

November 7, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 3:07-cv-05297-CRB Document 5 Filed 11/07/07 Page 2 of 3
3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

Case No. C 07-05297 BZ

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of San Diego. My business address is Fish & Richardson 

P.C., 12390 El Camino Real, San Diego, California 92130. I am over the age of 18 and not a 

party to the foregoing action. 

I am readily familiar with the business practice at my place of business for collection and 

processing of correspondence for personal delivery, for mailing with United States Postal Service, 

for facsimile, and for overnight delivery by Federal Express, Express Mail, or other overnight 

service. 

On November 7, 2007, I caused a copy of the following document(s): 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

TO ANSWER COMPLAINT 

to be served on the interested parties in this action by placing a true and correct copy thereof, 

enclosed in a sealed envelope, and addressed as follows: 

Shawn T. Leuthold 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

1671 The Alameda #303 

San Jose, CA 95126 

Attorneys For Plaintiff 

KAKU LAB CORPORATION 

X MAIL: Such correspondence was deposited, postage fully paid, with the 

United States Postal Service on the same day in the ordinary course 

of business. 

PERSONAL: Such envelope was delivered by hand to the offices of the addressee. 

ELECTRONIC 

MAIL: 

Such document was transmitted by electronic mail to the addressees’ 

email addresses as stated above. 

FEDERAL 

EXPRESS: 

Such correspondence was deposited on the same day in the ordinary 

course of business with a facility regularly maintained by Federal 

Express. 

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose 

direction the service was made. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed on 

November 7, 2007, at San Diego, California. 

s/Nicole C. Pino 

Nicole C. Pino 

Case 3:07-cv-05297-CRB Document 5 Filed 11/07/07 Page 3 of 3