Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01381/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01381-42/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

Kent A. Gardiner (pro hac vice)

Kathryn D. Kirmayer (pro hac vice)

Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)

David D. Cross (pro hac vice)

Matthew J. McBurney (pro hac vice)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004-2595

Telephone: 202-624-2500

Facsimile: 202-628-5116

E-mail: kgardiner@crowell.com

kkirmayer@crowell.com

jmurphy@crowell.com

dcross@crowell.com

mmcburney@crowell.com

Daniel A. Sasse (CA Bar No. 236234)

Theresa C. Lopez (CA Bar No. 205338)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor

Irvine, CA 92614-8505

Telephone: 949-263-8400

Facsimile: 949-263-8414

E-mail: dsasse@crowell.com

tlopez@crowell.com

Counsel for Sun Microsystems, Inc., Unisys Corporation, Jaco Electronics, Inc., Edge 

Electronics, Inc., and All American Semiconductor, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Sun Microsystems, Inc., et al. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al.

Unisys Corporation v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al.

All American Semiconductor, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al

Edge Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al.

Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al.

DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust, by its 

Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al.

Case Nos.: C-06-01665 PJH (Consolidated)

C-06-02915 PJH

C-07-01200 PJH 

C-07-01207 PJH 

C-07-01212 PJH 

C-07-01381 PJH

Assigned for all purposes to the

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING PAGE LIMIT FOR JOINT 

OPPOSITION TO NANYA DEFENDANTS’ 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS

Case 4:07-cv-01381-PJH Document 334 Filed 09/19/08 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

STIPULATION

This Stipulation is entered into between plaintiffs Sun Microsystems, Inc., Unisys 

Corporation, All American Semiconductor, Inc., Edge Electronics, Inc., Jaco Electronics, Inc., 

and DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendants Nanya 

Technology Corporation and Nanya Technology Corporation USA (collectively, “Defendants”) 

in the above-captioned actions, and is made with regard to the following facts:

WHEREAS, the deadline to file oppositions to dispositive motions is September 24, 2008;

WHEREAS, the parties are cooperating with each other in order to coordinate the briefing 

of dispositive motions so that they will be able, to the extent possible, reduce the burden that such 

motions will impose upon the Court;

WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-4 (b) permits parties to submit briefs up to 25 pages 

“[u]nless the Court expressly orders otherwise pursuant to a party’s request made prior to the due 

date”;

WHEREAS, on July 30, 2008, each of the Defendants filed a motion for summary 

judgment (totaling two motions) relating to all six cases;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs believe that collectively they will need no more than 35 pages to 

present their arguments in opposition to the two motions filed by Defendants’ for summary 

judgment;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs believe that by filing a Joint Opposition Brief on behalf of all six 

plaintiffs in response to both summary judgment motions filed by Defendants they will be able to 

reduce significantly the total number of pages that would be submitted if each Plaintiff were to 

file a separate brief in opposition to each of Defendants’ motions in each case;

WHEREAS, Defendants have agreed to Plaintiffs’ request for 10 additional pages for the 

above-described Joint Opposition Brief;

///

///

///

Case 4:07-cv-01381-PJH Document 334 Filed 09/19/08 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED as follows:

1. Plaintiffs shall file a Joint Opposition Brief in response to Defendants’ two 

Motions for Summary Judgment relating to all six cases that is of no more than 35 

pages in length. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED

Dated: September 16, 2008 CROWELL & MORING LLP

By: /s/ David D. Cross

David D. Cross

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.;

UNISYS CORPORATION;

ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.;

EDGE ELECTRONICS, INC. and

JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.

Dated: September 16, 2008 LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P.

By: /s/ James M. Lockhart

James M. Lockhart

Attorneys for Plaintiff DRAM CLAIMS 

LIQUIDATION TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE, 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Dated: September 16, 2008 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

By: /s/ Howard M. Ullman

Howard M. Ullman

Attorneys for Defendants

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and 

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION USA

Case 4:07-cv-01381-PJH Document 334 Filed 09/19/08 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

ATTESTATION OF FILING

I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the 

Plaintiffs and the Defendants listed in the signature blocks above.

/s/ David D. Cross

David D. Cross

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.;

UNISYS CORPORATION;

ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.;

EDGE ELECTRONICS, INC. and

JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.

Case 4:07-cv-01381-PJH Document 334 Filed 09/19/08 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PAGE LIMIT

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed the foregoing stipulated request, other matters properly before the Court, 

and the record in this case, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs shall have an additional 10 pages (i.e., a total of 35 pages) for their joint

brief in opposition to the two summary judgment briefs filed by defendants Nanya 

Technology Corporation and Nanya Technology Corporation USA relating to all 

six cases.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September ___, 2008

By: ___________________________

Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Court Judge

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-01381-PJH Document 334 Filed 09/19/08 Page 5 of 5