Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00614/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00614-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICKY JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

P. DESSENBERGER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-CV-00614 OWW SMS P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT, TO

COMMENCE FOLLOWING SCREENING BY

COURT

(Doc. 1)

Plaintiff Ricky Johnson (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action. Defendants P. Dessenberger and A. Dessenberger (“defendants”) removed the action from

Kern County Superior Court to this court on May 18, 2006. In conjunction with their notice of

removal, defendants move for a thirty-day extension of time to respond to the complaint,

commencing once the complaint has been screened by the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 

Good cause having been found, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ request for an extension of time to respond to the complaint is

GRANTED; and

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 1:06-cv-00614-LJO -SMS Document 5 Filed 08/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The court has a large number of cases pending before it and will screen the complaint in due course. 1

2

2. Defendants are relieved of their obligation to respond to the complaint until directed

to do so by the court, at which time defendants will be provided with thirty days to

respond.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 7, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00614-LJO -SMS Document 5 Filed 08/08/06 Page 2 of 2