Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00062/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00062-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Robert Kalani

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT KALANI,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMERCIAL NET LEASE REALTY, LP, 

A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; 

T.W.T. SERVICE INDUSTRIES aka TWT 

SERVICE INDUSTRIES dba DENNY’S 

RESTAURANT #6881,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 2:13-CV-00062-WBS-DAD

STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF 

LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Robert Kalani (“Plaintiff”), seeks to amend his complaint to 

allege additional access barriers which relate to his disability which were identified at a site 

inspection of the subject property by Plaintiff, which took place on June 11, 2013;

WHEREAS, the Ninth Circuit both urges and requires Plaintiff to identify in his 

complaint all barriers identified which relate to his disability. Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports 

(U.S.) Inc., 631 F.3d 939, 944 (9th Cir. 2011); Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903, 

909 (9th Cir. 2011);

WHEREAS, the Parties have not commenced discovery, other than the inspection of 

the subject property by Plaintiff;

Case 2:13-cv-00062-WBS-DAD Document 17 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not unduly delayed the amendment, does not bring it in bad 

faith, the amendment is not futile, and such amendment does not prejudice defendants 

Commercial Net Lease Realty, LP, and T.W.T. Service Industries (“Defendants”), nor does the 

amendment in any way change the nature of the action;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and 

Defendants, through their respective attorneys of record, that Plaintiff may file a First 

Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff file his First Amended Complaint 

within five (5) calendar days of the Court’s Order permitting such filing, and that Defendants’ 

responses thereto shall be due as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 9, 2013 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Robert Kalani

Dated: July 9, 2013 BASHAM LAW GROUP

/s/ Aaron R. Jackson 

Aaron R. Jackson 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

Commercial Net Lease Realty, LP and 

T.W.T. Service Industries

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff file his First Amended Complaint, a copy of 

which was filed with the Parties’ stipulation, within five (5) calendar days of the date this 

Order is filed. 

Case 2:13-cv-00062-WBS-DAD Document 17 Filed 07/09/13 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ response thereto shall be filed within 

fourteen (14) days after the First Amended Complaint is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 9, 2013

Case 2:13-cv-00062-WBS-DAD Document 17 Filed 07/09/13 Page 3 of 3