Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-mc-00044/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-mc-00044-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

North Shore Bank FSB, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Darrel Keuck, 

Defendant. 

JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, 

 Garnishee.

No. MC-15-00044-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on Garnishment and 

United States Magistrate Judge John Boyle’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). 

Docs. 13, 16. The R&R recommends that the Court grant judgment on garnishment 

Doc. 13 at 4. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file 

objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a 

waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 4 (citing 28 U.S.C. ¶ 636(b)(1); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), 6(b) and 72). 

 The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to 

review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 

(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is 

not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must 

Case 2:15-mc-00044-GMS Document 18 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly 

objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is welltaken. The Court will accept the R&R and grant judgment on garnishment. See 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole 

or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; 

receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”). 

IT IS ORDERED:

 1. Magistrate Judge Boyle’s R&R (Doc. 13) is accepted. 

 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on Garnishment (Doc. 13) is granted. 

 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Judgment 

Creditor North Shore Bank, FSB, and against Garnishee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 

(“Garnishee”) in the amount of $2,229.50 as being held by Garnishee from the account of 

Darrell Keuck. 

 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. 

 Dated this 26th day of October, 2015. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-mc-00044-GMS Document 18 Filed 10/26/15 Page 2 of 2