Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01053/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01053-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

---

DIEPENBROCK

HARRISON

A PROFESSIONAL

CORPORATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Denying Motion to Strike

COUNSEL IDENTIFICATION AT END

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONSOLIDATED SALMON CASES CASE NOS.

1:09-cv-1053-OWW-DLB

CONSOLIDATED SALMONID CASES

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 

STRIKE

SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER 

AUTHORITY, et al. v. GARY F. LOCKE, 

et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-1053)

STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT v. 

NOAA, et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-1090)

STATE WATER CONTRACTORS v. 

GARY F. LOCKE, et al.

(Case No. 1:09-cv-1378)

KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY, et al. 

v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 

et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-1520)

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al. 

v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 

et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-2452)

METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF 

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA v. NMFS, et al.

(Case No. 1:09-cv-1625)

Case 1:09-cv-01053-LJO-BAM Document 338 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 2
DIEPENBROCK

HARRISON

A PROFESSIONAL

CORPORATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

{00233084; 1} - 1 -

Order Denying Motion to Strike

ORDER

Federal Defendants’ and Defendant-Intervenors’ (collectively “Defendants”) motion to 

strike Plaintiffs’ and Plaintiff Intervenor California Department of Water Resources’ (“DWR”) 

Notices of Disapproval of Defendants’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law came 

on for hearing by telephonic conference on May 4, 2010. All parties were represented by 

counsel, as stated on the record.

The Court, having considered the written and oral arguments, hereby orders:

1. Defendants’ Motion to Strike is DENIED.

2. Defendants’ request to submit their own Notice of Disapproval of Plaintiffs’ and 

DWR’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law is GRANTED. Any 

such Notice of Disapproval shall be filed no later than 5 p.m. PST Friday, May 7, 

2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

emm0d64h

Case 1:09-cv-01053-LJO-BAM Document 338 Filed 05/10/10 Page 2 of 2