Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-md-01486/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-md-01486-153/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] AMEND. NO. 1 TO THE 

MARCH 21, 2007 PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 06-6436 PJH 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS 

MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

STATE OF NEW YORK, 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., et 

al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 06-6436 PJH 

Assigned for all purposes to the 

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

[PROPOSED] AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 

THE MARCH 21, 2007 PROTECTIVE 

ORDER 

Related to MDL. No. 1486 

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 1890 Filed 07/07/08 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] AMEND. NO. 1 TO THE 

MARCH 21, 2007 PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CASE NO. C 06-6436 PJH 

1

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE MARCH 21, 2007 PROTECTIVE ORDER

Based on the Stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, 

Paragraph 15 of the March 21, 2007 Protective Order entered by this Court is hereby 

ordered amended as follows: 

15. Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the party 

or non-party who produced documents designated as “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential” under this Protective order (the “Producing Party”), or a court order 

obtained after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a party, other than the 

Producing Party, may not file in the public record in this action any documents designated 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential.” If any documents designated “Confidential” or 

“Highly Confidential” would be included in any pleading, memorandum or other court 

filing, counsel for the party wishing to include such “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential” documents shall meet and confer with opposing counsel and/or counsel for 

the Producing Party in advance of the filing of any such pleading, memorandum or other 

court filing, in order to narrow or eliminate the documents for which the Producing Party 

seeks confidential status. In attempting to narrow or eliminate the number of documents 

for which the Producing Party seeks confidential status, counsel shall be guided by the 

standards set forth in Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 

2006). If the meet and confer does not eliminate the need for all or part of the pleading, 

memorandum or other court filing in question to be filed under seal, the parties shall 

follow the procedures specified in Civil Local Rule 79-5, and shall furthermore support 

any request for the sealing of documents with the requisite showing of need, as set forth in 

Kamakana. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: July ___, 2008 

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

United States District Judge of the 

United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California 

LA2:863628.1 

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 1890 Filed 07/07/08 Page 2 of 2