Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01920/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01920-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

BOGGS (15cv1920) stip cont stmt conf - 1 - 

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rachel M. Dollar, SBN 199977

Richard R. Sutherland, SBN 240858 

SMITH DOLLAR PC 

Attorneys at Law 

404 Mendocino Avenue, Second Floor 

Santa Rosa, California 95401 

Telephone: (707) 522-1100 

Facsimile: (707) 522-1101 

Attorneys for Defendants VICTORIA'S SECRET, VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES 

BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC., L. BRANDS STORE DESIGN AND 

CONSTRUCTION, INC., L. BRANDS DIRECT FULFILLMENT, INC., L. 

BRANDS, INC. 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 (SACRAMENTO DIVISON) 

BARBARA BOGGS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VICTORIA'S SECRET, VICTORIA'S 

SECRET STORES BRAND 

MANAGEMENT, INC., L. BRANDS 

STORE DESIGN AND 

CONSTRUCTION, INC., L. BRANDS 

DIRECT FULFILLMENT, INC., L. 

BRANDS, INC., and DOES 1 to 50, 

inclusive 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-01920- KJM-KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE SETTLEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Date: May 6, 2016 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 25, 8th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller 

Settlement Judge: Hon. Kendall J. 

Newman 

Complaint Filed: July 24, 2015 

Trial Date: April 17, 2017

STIPULATION 

Plaintiff Barbara Boggs (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants (with Plaintiff, the 

“Parties”) jointly submit their request to continue the Settlement Conference, 

currently set for May 6, 2016, for good cause as set forth below: 

1. This action is a personal injury action arising out a trip and fall wherein 

Plaintiff is alleging significant injury and monetary damages; 

2. The parties previously submitted a Stipulation and Order to continue a 

Settlement Conference from February 5, 2016 to May 6, 2016; 

3. At the time, the Parties were discussing the dismissal of certain 

Case 2:15-cv-01920-KJM-KJN Document 13 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 5
BOGGS (15cv1920) stip cont stmt conf - 2 - 

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

defendants who were improperly named, and for Plaintiff to file an 

Amended Complaint to name the proper defendant to this action; 

4. On March 4, 2016, this Court entered an Order granting Plaintiff leave 

to file an Amended Complaint which would have dismissed the 

improper defendants and added the proper defendant per a stipulation of 

the parties; 

5. The Court’s March 4, 2016 Order, however, inadvertently dismissed the 

improper defendants with prejudice, as opposed to without prejudice as 

agreed-upon by the parties, and Plaintiff has only just submitted a 

proposed order remedying this issue and, if entered, ; 

6. Due to the erroneous March 4, 2016 Order, and Plaintiff’s delay in filing 

an Amended Complaint in order to name the proper defendant, the 

parties have not yet completed the discovery necessary for the May 6, 

2016 Settlement Conference to constitute a meaningful opportunity to 

try and resolve this matter; 

7. Plaintiff is also now unavailable for the May 6, 2016 Settlement 

Conference due to the fact she will be traveling out-of-state for a family 

event that cannot be rescheduled; 

8. The parties believe that with additional time to complete the necessary 

discovery, a later settlement conference will only have a greater 

likelihood of resolving this dispute; 

9. Defendant’s counsel contacted Judge Newman’s courtroom and 

obtained an alternative date of August 2, 2016 to hold the Settlement 

Conference that is convenient to Judge Newman, the parties’ and their 

counsel. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:15-cv-01920-KJM-KJN Document 13 Filed 04/11/16 Page 2 of 5
BOGGS (15cv1920) stip cont stmt conf - 3 - 

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In light of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the 

Parties, by and through their respective counsel that the Settlement Conference 

currently set for May 6, 2016 should be continued to August 2, 2016.

Dated: April 8, 2016 

SMITH DOLLAR PC 

 /s/ Richard R. Sutherland 

By Richard R. Sutherland 

Attorney for Defendants 

Dated: April 8, 2016 QUINN & KRONLUND, LLP 

 /s/ Michael C. Kronlund 

By 

 Michael C. Kronlund 

Attorney for Plaintiff Barbara Boggs

Case 2:15-cv-01920-KJM-KJN Document 13 Filed 04/11/16 Page 3 of 5
BOGGS (15cv1920) stip cont stmt conf - 4 - 

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

Having reviewed the Stipulation submitted by the Parties, and good cause 

appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the request to continue the Settlement 

Conference. 

The Settlement Conference currently set for May 6, 2016, is hereby vacated 

and continued to August 2, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 25, 8th Floor, before 

Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 8, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-01920-KJM-KJN Document 13 Filed 04/11/16 Page 4 of 5
BOGGS (15cv1920) stip cont stmt conf - 1 - 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SONOMA 

I am employed in the County of Sonoma, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 404 Mendocino Avenue, Second Floor, Santa Rosa, CA 95401. 

On April 8, 2016, I served the foregoing document described as STIPULATION 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT 

CONFERENCE all interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as stated on the attached service list: 

[X] BY MAIL - I deposited such envelope in the mail at Santa Rosa, California. The 

envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am “readily familiar” with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Santa Rosa, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one (1) day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 

[X] (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this 

Court at whose direction the service was made. 

Executed on April 8, 2016, at the address above. 

/s/ Stephanie Abbott _________________________________________ Stephanie D. Abbott 

SERVICE LIST 

BARBARA BOGGS v. VICTORIA'S SECRET, VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC., L. BRANDS STORE DESIGN AND 

CONSTRUCTION, INC., L. BRANDS DIRECT FULFILLMENT, INC., L. BRANDS, INC., and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive 

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No.2:15-CV-01920- KJMKJN 

Michael C. Kronlund

Kevin J. Hermanson 

Quinn & Kronlund, LLP 

509 W. Weber Avenue, Suite 400 

Stockton, CA 95203 

Plaintiff Barbara Boggs Telephone: (209) 943-3950 

Facsimile: (209) 943-3505 

Email: mkronlund@quinnlaw.net 

Case 2:15-cv-01920-KJM-KJN Document 13 Filed 04/11/16 Page 5 of 5