Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00051/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00051-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS RE: MSJ’S 

CASE NO. C-07-00051-MHP

PAMELA Y. PRICE (S.B. # 107713) – pypesq@aol.com

PRICE AND ASSOCIATES 

1611 Telegraph Avenue, Ste. 1450 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 452-0292 

Facsimile: (510) 452-5625 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BERNICE PEOPLES 

RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053) redwards@omm.com 

ROBIN M. WALL (S.B. #235690) rwall@omm.com 

DAMALI A. TAYLOR (admitted pro hac vice)

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO (S.B. #208606) ccatalano@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

1625 Eye Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20006-4001 

Telephone: (202) 383-5300 

Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 

Attorneys for Defendants 

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, GUS S. KRAMER 

and LORI KOCH 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

BERNICE PEOPLES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, GUS S. 

KRAMER in his individual capacity, LORI 

KOCH in her individual capacity, and 

DOES 1 through 15, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C-07-0051 MHP 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING DEPOSITION 

TESTIMONY IN SUPPORT OF 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITIONS THERETO 

Hearing Date: May 5, 2008 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

Courtroom: 15, 18th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Marilyn H. Patel 

Case 3:07-cv-00051-MHP Document 85 Filed 04/17/08 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -1- 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS RE: MSJ’S 

CASE NO. C-07-00051-MHP

The parties, having met and conferred by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to 

file no later than April 22, 2008 the marked deposition transcripts required by the Court’s 

standing order, and jointly request an order of the Court approving the stipulation. Good cause 

for the order exists for the following reasons. 

1. Under the Court’s standing order, “[d]epositions used in connection with a motion 

shall be filed at the time the oppositions are filed and shall be marked as follows. The entire 

deposition shall be submitted (if deposition is in one volume; otherwise only the volume 

containing designated portions shall be provided), one copy only, tabbed as necessary or 

otherwise marked. Objections shall be noted in the margin by use of a keyed system. This will 

provide the court with one deposition together with the objections of all the parties appearing on 

the face of the designated abstract.” 

2. Defendants filed motions for summary judgment on March 24, 2008. On April 3, 

2008, Defendants’ counsel wrote to Plaintiff’s counsel, requesting that Plaintiff provide any 

objections to the deposition testimony cited in support of Defendants’ motions. Defendants did 

not receive a response to this request. 

3. As indicated in Plaintiff’s declaration filed today, April 15, 2008, Plaintiff did not 

meet and confer with Defendants’ counsel in advance of April 14, 2008, the stipulated date her 

oppositions were due, in order to identify the deposition excerpts on which Plaintiff intended to 

rely in her oppositions so that the parties could file with the oppositions the single version of the 

transcripts contemplated by the Court’s order. 

4. Nevertheless, the parties wish to provide the Court with the necessary transcripts. 

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and respectfully request an order that they may file, no later 

than April 22, 2008, deposition transcripts in connection with the summary judgment motions in 

the form required by the Court. 

Case 3:07-cv-00051-MHP Document 85 Filed 04/17/08 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -2- 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS RE: MSJ’S 

CASE NO. C-07-00051-MHP

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 15, 2008 PRICE AND ASSOCIATES 

By: ___/s/ Pamela Y. Price______

 Pamela Y. Price 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff BERNICE PEOPLES 

Dated: April 15, 2008 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: __/s/ Robin M. Wall________

 Robin M. Wall 

 

Attorneys for Defendants 

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, GUS S. 

KRAMER and LORI KOCH 

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from Pamela Y. Price. 

Dated: April 15, 2008 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: __/s/ Robin M. Wall________

 Robin M. Wall 

 

Attorneys for Defendants 

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, GUS S. 

KRAMER and LORI KOCH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT 

IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties may file, no later than April 22, 2008, the deposition 

transcripts in connection with Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in the form required 

by the Court’s standing order. 

Dated: ___________________ 

 _________________________________ 

 HON. MARILYN HALL PATEL 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DC1:743000.1 

The transcripts shall be filed in full, no redactions or portions. 4/16/2008

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:07-cv-00051-MHP Document 85 Filed 04/17/08 Page 3 of 3