Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04518/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04518-48/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD SIEMERS and FORREST

MCKENNA, individually and on behalf of all

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

WELLS FARGO & CO., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-04518 WHA

REQUEST FOR BRIEFING

With respect to class certification, each side is requested to answer the following

questions by MONDAY, MAY 21 at NOON in memoranda no longer than ten pages (the defense

filing jointly):

1. Identify the specific prospectuses and SAIs that covered the specific purchases

made by Siemers and the time period for which such prospectuses and SAIs were effective.

2. With respect to each such prospectus and SAI, identify the other Wells Fargo

funds, if any, also covered by the same documents and the time periods during which it was

used.

3. Focusing solely on Siemers’ individualized claim, what will be the methodology

to prove loss causation and the dollar amount of damages?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 15, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-04518-WHA Document 338 Filed 05/15/07 Page 1 of 1