Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_15-cv-08031/USCOURTS-azd-3_15-cv-08031-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jose Luis Millan-Camacho,

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-15-08031-PCT-SRB

ORDER 

 Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

2254 on March 11, 2015 raising two grounds for relief: 1) ineffective assistance of trial 

counsel; and 2) that he is an “immigrant or alien and not understanding the law.” 

Respondents filed their Response to Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on 

August 18, 2015. No reply was filed. On October 20, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued her 

Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied. 

 In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time 

to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation 

have been filed. 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. 

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the order of this Court. 

Case 3:15-cv-08031-SRB Document 16 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

and dismissing it with prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a 

plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the procedural ruling 

debatable. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

 Dated this 12th day of November, 2015. 

Case 3:15-cv-08031-SRB Document 16 Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 2