Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02328/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02328-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1319 Pollutants &amp; Permit Violations

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO. 2:05-cv-02328-DFL-GGH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 1

ANDREW L. PACKARD (Cal. Bar No. 168690) 

MICHAEL P. LYNES (Cal. Bar No. 230462) 

Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard 

319 Pleasant Street 

Petaluma, CA 94952 

Tel: (707) 763-7227 

Fax: (707) 763-9227 

E-mail: andrew@packardlawoffices.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA 

MICHAEL R. LOZEAU (Cal. Bar No. 142893) 

Law Office of Michael R. Lozeau 

1516 Oak Street, Suite 216 

Alameda, CA 94501 

Tel: (510) 749-9102 

Fax: (510) 749-9103 

E-mail: mrlozeau@lozeaulaw.com

SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING 

PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non profit 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COURT GALVANIZING, INC. 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:05-cv-002328-DFL-GGH 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITH 

PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(2)] 

 

WHEREAS, on September 8, 2005, Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance 

(“CSPA”) provided Defendant Court Galvanizing, Inc. with a Notice of Violations and Intent to 

File Suit (“Notice”) under Clean Water Act §505, 33 U.S.C. §1365. 

WHEREAS, on November 17, 2005 CSPA filed its Complaint against Court Galvanizing 

in this court, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Court Galvanizing, Inc. Case No. 

2:05-cv-002328-DFL-GGH. Said Complaint incorporates by reference all of the allegations 

contained in CSPA’s Notice. 

Case 2:05-cv-02328-DFL-GGH Document 19 Filed 02/20/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO. 2:05-cv-02328-DFL-GGH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 2

WHEREAS, CSPA and Court Galvanizing, through their authorized representatives and 

without either adjudication of CSPA’s claims or admission by Court Galvanizing of any alleged 

violation or other wrongdoing, have chosen to resolve in full by way of settlement the allegations 

of CSPA as set forth in the Notice and Complaint, thereby avoiding the costs and uncertainties of 

further litigation. A copy of the [Proposed] Consent Agreement entered into by and between 

CSPA and Court Galvanizing is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference. 

WHEREAS, the parties submitted the Settlement Agreement via certified mail, return 

receipt requested, to the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice and the 45-day review 

period set forth at 40 C.F.R. § 135.5 has completed. 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the 

parties that CSPA’s claims, as set forth in the Notice and Complaint, be dismissed with prejudice 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The parties respectfully request an order 

from this Court dismissing such claims with prejudice. In accordance with paragraph 33 of the 

Consent Agreement, the parties also request that this Court retain and have jurisdiction over the 

Parties with respect to disputes arising under the agreement. 

Dated: February 14, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD 

By: /s/ Michael Lynes 

Michael Lynes 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: February 14, 2007 STANZLER FUNDERBURK & CASTELLON LLP 

By: /s/ Ruben Castellon

Ruben A. Castellon 

Attorney for Defendant 

[electronically signed with consent of counsel] 

Case 2:05-cv-02328-DFL-GGH Document 19 Filed 02/20/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO. 2:05-cv-02328-DFL-GGH 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 3

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Good cause appearing, and the parties having stipulated and agreed, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance’s 

claims against Court Galvanizing, Inc. as set forth in the Notice and Complaint filed in Case No. 

2:05-cv-02328-DFL-GGH, are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain and have jurisdiction over the 

Parties with respect to disputes arising under the agreement attached to the parties’ Stipulation to 

Dismiss as Exhibit A. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA 

Dated: February 16, 2007 

/s/ David F. Levi__________________________

David F. Levi, United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-02328-DFL-GGH Document 19 Filed 02/20/07 Page 3 of 3