Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-3_06-cv-00009/USCOURTS-almd-3_06-cv-00009-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

THOMAS J. COZART *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 3:06-CV-9-MEF

 (WO)

LEE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, *

et al.,

*

Defendants.

 _______________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On January 11, 2006 the court granted Plaintiff fifteen days to file an amendment to

his complaint. (Doc. No. 4.) Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to comply with the

January 11 order would result in a Recommendation that his complaint be dismissed. (Id.)

The requisite time has passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the order of the court.

Consequently, the court concludes that dismissal of this case is appropriate for Plaintiff’s

failure to comply with the order of the court.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case

be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the January 11, 2006

order of this court.

It is further

ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the said

Recommendation on or before February 15, 2006. Any objections filed must specifically

Case 3:06-cv-00009-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 2
2

identify the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation objected to. Frivolous,

conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The parties are

advised that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore, it is not

appealable.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the

Magistrate Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District

Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual

findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain

error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982). See Stein

v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of

Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981, en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the

decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on

September 30, 1981.

DONE, this 2nd day of February, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

Case 3:06-cv-00009-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 02/02/06 Page 2 of 2