Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00924/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00924-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mohamad Ruhul Amid, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Katrina Kane, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-0924-PHX-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. At the time he filed his Petition (May 9, 2011), Petitioner was

in immigration detention awaiting removal. On February 15, 2012, the Magistrate Judge

issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 20) recommending that the Petition

be denied as moot because Petitioner is no longer in immigration detention.

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts

the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not

required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”

(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en

banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s

findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis

in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Based on the foregoing,

Case 2:11-cv-00924-JAT Document 21 Filed 03/26/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is ACCEPTED;

Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed, without prejudice,

and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 26th day of March, 2012.

Case 2:11-cv-00924-JAT Document 21 Filed 03/26/12 Page 2 of 2