Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01194/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01194-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1This change does not change the outcome of the Court's decision. 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Best Western International, Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

1496815 Ontario, Inc. et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 04-1194-PHX-SMM

NOTICE OF ERRATA

On March 13, 2007, the Court entered an Order (Doc. 42) in the above-captioned case

denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. However, a single word ("no") was inadvertently omitted

from footnote 12 of the Order, thereby significantly altering the meaning of the footnote.1

 

Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the language of footnote 12 (Doc. 42) is hereby changed

from 

Although the Arthur Wishart Act may potentially conflict with American substantive

law as it applies to the forum selection clause of the Membership Agreement, the

Court finds that there would be conflict as to the trademark issues.

to

Although the Arthur Wishart Act may potentially conflict with American

substantive law as it applies to the forum selection clause of the Membership

Agreement, the Court finds that there would be no conflict as to the

trademark issues. (Emphasis added)

DATED this 4th day of April, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-01194-SMM Document 45 Filed 04/05/07 Page 1 of 1