Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01138/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01138-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMAAL THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTIPOV, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:11-cv-1138-MCE-EFB P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On February 12, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 12, 2015, are adopted in full; 

/////

Case 2:11-cv-01138-MCE-EFB Document 132 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 112) is granted as to defendants 

Grinde, Ma, Maciel, McGee, and Park, but granted in part and denied in part as to defendant 

Downie and denied as to defendant Antipov; and

3. Plaintiff’s counter-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 122) is denied as to all 

defendants.

Dated: March 19, 2015

Case 2:11-cv-01138-MCE-EFB Document 132 Filed 03/20/15 Page 2 of 2