Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01176/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01176-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VISA U.S.A. INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

AUDIENCE IDENTIFICATION INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-01176 SI

ORDER MODIFYING DISCOVERY

ORDER (Docket No. 52)

On February 2, 2010, the Court issued an order directing defendant Aii to produce a Rule

30(b)(6) deponent no later than February 19, 2010, and stating that production of the “records of the

100,000 account holders in dispute are largely unrelated to the topics on which Visa seeks to depose

Aii.” Feb. 2, 2010 Order (Docket No. 52). After conferring with the parties at the Case

Management Conference on February 4 and reviewing the parties’ supplemental letter briefs, the

Court is now of the view that Aii’s 30(b)(6) designee will not be able to testify fully on all the

designated topics without the benefit of the records sought from Visa. Accordingly, the Court

hereby modifies its February 2, 2010 order as follows:

Aii shall produce its 30(b)(6) representative for an initial deposition of no more than four

hours by February 26, 2010. Any continued deposition of Aii’s representative shall take place after

discovery of the records sought from Visa. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2010 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01176-SI Document 64 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 1