Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04976/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04976-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08:1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ARTURO DEVESA VILLANUEVA,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:14-cv-04976-HRL 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS 

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

Plaintiff filed this action on November 10, 2014. There is no indication that any of the 

defendants have been served, and there has been little activity on the docket since the complaint 

was filed. Plaintiff’s counsel, who apparently is a Washington state attorney, has not applied for 

pro hac vice admission before this court. Additionally, plaintiff failed to comply with this court’s 

June 28, 2016 order to file a status report. Accordingly, no later than July 15, 2016, plaintiff 

shall file a response to this order and show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure 

to prosecute and to follow court orders.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 5, 2016

HOWARD R. LLOYD

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:14-cv-04976-EJD Document 11 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

5:14-cv-04976-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Carllene Marva Placide placide@placidelaw.com

Case 5:14-cv-04976-EJD Document 11 Filed 07/05/16 Page 2 of 2