Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00058/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00058-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

VICTOR A. GONSALVES,

NO. CIV. S-06-058 WBS KJM

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE: EVIDENTIARY

OBJECTIONS

CONSECO INSURANCE COMPANY,

formerly known as CONSECO

ANNUITY ASSURANCE COMPANY,

CONSECO SERVICES, LLC, CONSECO

MARKETING, LL, DARIN LUCAS,

and DOES 1 to 200 inclusive,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

Before the court is defendant Darin Lucas’ motion for

summary judgment. On April 24, 2006, defendant filed objections

to 26 statements in Plaintiff Victor Gonsalves’ declaration in

support of his opposition to the motion for summary judgment. 

Defendants’ objections are made primarily on the grounds that the

statements at issue constitute hearsay or inadmissable opinions

or conclusions of law rather than statements of fact, or are

lacking personal knowledge or foundation, are legal opinions and

Case 2:06-cv-00058-WBS -KJM Document 45 Filed 04/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

not facts, mischaracterizations, a waste of time, immaterial,

and/or irrelevant. 

To rule on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment,

the court must first decide these objections. Accordingly, at

the hearing currently set for May 1, 2006, at 1:30 p.m., the

court will hear only the evidentiary objections. The hearing on

the motion for summary judgment will be rescheduled for a later

date after the evidentiary objections have been resolved.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 27, 2006

Case 2:06-cv-00058-WBS -KJM Document 45 Filed 04/27/06 Page 2 of 2