Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00013/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00013-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAHEE ABDULLAH RASHEED,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0013 DAD P

vs.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., ORDER

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. §

1983, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3769a(b) and 3769b(a)(1), and California Penal Code § 1170.12. Plaintiff

has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).

By an order filed May 25, 2010, the court denied plaintiff’s application to proceed

in forma pauperis on the basis that the “three strikes” provision of the Prisoner Litigation Reform

Act bars the court from granting him that status. Order (Doc. No. 5), filed May 25, 2010 (citing

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). Plaintiff was ordered to pay the $350.00 filing fee, within thirty days, or

this action would be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid

the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

/////

/////

Case 2:10-cv-00013-DAD Document 6 Filed 07/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice.

DATED: July 7, 2010.

DAD:4

rash0013.dism

Case 2:10-cv-00013-DAD Document 6 Filed 07/08/10 Page 2 of 2