Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00882/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00882-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

COOLEY GODWARD LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MASTER FILE NO. C-05-0882-CRB 

COOLEY GODWARD LLP 

GRANT P. FONDO (181530) (gfondo@cooley.com)

LAURA R. SMITH (205159) (laura.smith@cooley.com)

Five Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 

Telephone: (650) 843-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 857-0663 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LEADIS TECHNOLOGY, INC., SUNG TAE (“STEVE”) 

AHN, VICTOR LEE, KEUNMYUNG (“KEN”) LEE, LIP-BU 

TAN, KENNETH GOLDMAN, JAMES PLUMMER and 

ARATI PRABHAKAR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re LEADIS TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION, 

This Document Relates To: 

 ALL ACTIONS. 

Master File No. C-05-0882-CRB 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER AGREEING TO EXTEND

PAGE LIMITATION FOR LEADIS

DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM OF

POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN

SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION

COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFFS’

RESPONSE THERETO

Trial Date: Not Yet Set 

Case 3:05-cv-00882-CRB Document 39 Filed 10/28/05 Page 1 of 4
COOLEY GODWARD LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MASTER FILE NO. C-05-0882-CRB 

 WHEREAS, on March 11, 2005, Plaintiff Charles Gottschalk filed a 29-page complaint 

(C-05-1034-CRB in this action against defendants Leadis Technology, Inc., Sung Tae Ahn, 

Victor Lee, Keunmyung Lee, Lip-Bu Tan, Kenneth Goldman, James Plummer and Arati 

Prabhakar (collectively, the “Leadis Defendants”) and Goldman, Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch, 

Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Thomas Weisel Partners LLC, and Needham & Company, Inc. 

(collectively, the “Underwriter Defendants”). 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order dated October 11, 2005, the defendants’ motions to 

dismiss plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) are due to be filed by 

October 28, 2005. 

 WHEREAS, the Complaint features lengthy allegations referencing numerous statements 

contained in Leadis’ Prospectus and Registration Statement, filed on or about June 16, 2004, and 

involves complex issues under the federal securities laws. 

 WHEREAS, the complexity of both the nature of the allegations, and the responses to 

such allegations require a careful analysis of these statements, their context and the case law. 

 WHEREAS, the Court’s Standing Order provides that all briefs or memoranda of points 

and authorities in support of any motion may not exceed 15 pages in length. 

 WHEREAS, in order to promote judicial efficiency and avoid unnecessary duplication, 

the seven individual Leadis Defendants, as well as defendant Leadis Technology, Inc., intend to 

file one Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of their Motion to Dismiss the 

Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Memorandum of Points and Authorities”) not in excess 

of 25 pages. 

 WHEREAS, the Leadis Defendants intend to file concurrently herewith a Motion for 

Administrative Relief to Extend Page Limitations (the “Motion”) requesting a page limitation 

extension to 25 pages for their Memorandum of Points and Authorities. 

 WHEREAS, the other parties to the action agree not to oppose the Leadis Defendants’ 

request for an extension of page limitation to 25 pages provided that plaintiffs receive the same 

extension, and waive the time period under Civil L.R. 7-11(b) for filing an opposition to the 

Motion.

Case 3:05-cv-00882-CRB Document 39 Filed 10/28/05 Page 2 of 4
COOLEY GODWARD LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MASTER FILE NO. C-05-0882-CRB 

 WHEREAS, the other parties do not oppose plaintiffs’ extension request 

 NOW THEREFORE, the parties to the action, by and through their attorneys, hereby 

stipulate and agree, and request that: 

 1. The Leadis Defendants be permitted a page limitation extension to 25 pages for 

their Memorandum of Points and Authorities. 

 2. Plaintiffs be permitted a page limitation extension to 25 pages for their response to 

the Memorandum of Points and Authorities. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 28, 2005 COOLEY GODWARD LLP 

 /s/

Laura R. Smith 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LEADIS TECHNOLOGY, INC., SUNG TAE 

(“STEVE”) AHN, VICTOR LEE, KEUNMYUNG 

(“KEN”) LEE, LIP-BU TAN, KENNETH 

GOLDMAN, JAMES PLUMMER and ARATI 

PRABHAKAR 

Dated: October 28, 2005 GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

 /s/

Michael B. Smith 

1881 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 849-5324 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5024 

Attorneys for Defendants 

GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., MERRILL 

LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, 

THOMAS WEISEL PARTNERS LLC AND 

NEEDHAM & COMPANY 

Case 3:05-cv-00882-CRB Document 39 Filed 10/28/05 Page 3 of 4
COOLEY GODWARD LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 3. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MASTER FILE NO. C-05-0882-CRB 

Dated: October 28, 2005 GREEN WELLING LLP 

 /s/

Avin P. Sharma 

595 Market Street, Suite 2750 

San Francisco, California 94015 

Telephone: (415) 477-6700 

Facsimile: (415) 477-6710 

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and Class 

Andrew L. Zivitz 

Todd M. Moser 

SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

Telephone: (610 667-7706 

Facsimile: (610) 667-7056 

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and Class

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ ____________________________ 

 The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

 United States District Court 

713944 v1/PA

October 28, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-00882-CRB Document 39 Filed 10/28/05 Page 4 of 4