Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01124/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01124-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOYLE WAYNE DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GAIL LEWIS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-01124-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ORDERING

PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH COURT’S

ORDER WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Docs. 17 and 18)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME AS UNNECESSARY

(Doc. 20)

Plaintiff Doyle Wayne Davis (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 9, 2006, the court issued

an order requiring plaintiff to complete the USM-285 forms and summonses enclosed with the order

and return them within thirty days. On August 2, 2006, after more than thirty days passed and

plaintiff failed to comply with or otherwise respond to the order, the court issued a Findings and

Recommendations recommending dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order. On

September 6, 2006, plaintiff filed an objection to the Findings and Recommendations and on

September 12, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion seeking an extension of time to file an objection. 

Based on plaintiff’s assertion that he was placed in isolation without his legal property before

he could comply with the court’s order, the court will vacate the Findings and Recommendations.

(Doc. 19.) It is unnecessary for plaintiff to file any further objection and his motion for an extension

of time shall be denied for that reason.

Case 1:05-cv-01124-LJO -SMS Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on August 2, 2006, is VACATED;

2. Plaintiff shall comply with the court’s order of June 9, 2006, within thirty (30) days

from the date of service of this order; and

3. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, filed September 12, 2006, is DENIED as

unnecessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 20, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01124-LJO -SMS Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 2