Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01820/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01820-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCO PEREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. G. ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:11-cv-01820-BAM-PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

REQUEST TO SERVE DEFENDANTS

(ECF NOs. 38, 39)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

REQUEST TO MODIFY SCHEDULING 

ORDER (ECF NO. 42)

Plaintiff Marco Pereiz is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On May 18, 2015, an order was entered, granting Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend 

the complaint, for limited purposes. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a new first amended 

complaint as follows: to substitute Defendants Latraille and Taber for Defendants Carter and 

Schneider; to reinstate Defendant Hubach, only for his personal participation in the pepper-spray 

assault against Plaintiff; and to add medical claims against Defendants Pineda, John Doe RN, 

Nurse Johnson, Nurse Lopez, and Nurse Moss. The Court specifically noted that Plaintiff’s first 

amended complaint may only include allegations against Defendants C/O Byrum, C/O Pimentel, 

Latrialle, Taber, Hubach, Pineda, John Doe RN, Nurse Johnson, Nurse Lopez, and Nurse Moss. 

Plaintiff was specifically cautioned that he shall not be granted leave to reinstate his claims 

concerning his unclothed body search, supervisory liability or cell conditions. 

Case 1:11-cv-01820-BAM Document 44 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On June 8, 2015, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint that complied with the Mary 

18, 2015, order. On December 8, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for the Court to serve the first 

amended complaint along with USM 285 forms. Plaintiff has completed and returned to the 

Court the USM 285 forms for service. On January 22, 2016, Defendants Byrum and Pimentel 

filed a motion to modify the scheduling order. Defendants seek to vacate the current scheduling 

order as the new defendants have yet been served. Good cause appearing, the current scheduling 

order should be vacated. A new scheduling order will be entered upon the filing of an answer by 

the new defendants.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for service is granted. The Clerk’s Office is directed to send to

the U.S. Marshal the forms for service of process submitted by Plaintiff on December 

8, 2015. 

2. The scheduling order in this action is vacated. A new scheduling order will be 

entered upon the filing of an answer by the new defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01820-BAM Document 44 Filed 02/17/16 Page 2 of 2