Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00388/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00388-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1365 Environmental Matters

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARDEROSIAN, 

RUNYON, CERCONE,

LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721

Michael G. Marderosian, No. 77296

Brett L. Runyon, No. 133501

Michael E. Lehman, No. 133523

Charles A. Leath, No. 225119

MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE, 

 LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, California 93721

Telephone: (559) 441-7991

Facsimile: (559) 441-8170

Michael J. Bidart, No. 60582

Ricardo Echeverria, No. 166049

Gregory L. Bentley, No. 151147

SHERNOFF, BIDART & DARRAS

600 South Indian Hill Boulevard

Claremont, CA 91711-5498

Telephone: (909) 621-4935

Facsimile: (909) 625-6915

Jack Silver, No. 160575

LAW OFFICE OF JACK SILVER

Post Office Box 5469

Santa Rosa, California 95402

Telephone: (707) 829-0934

Facsimile: (707) 528-8675

Attorneys for: Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDNA AFFHOLTER, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

 vs.

FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT,

ET AL.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:07-CV-0388 OWW DLB

STIPULATION RE SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE ORDER AND

AMENDMENT TO SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs and defendants, through their

respective counsel, the law firm of Marderosian, Runyon, Cercone, Lehman & Armo signing on behalf

of all plaintiffs, and defendants’ liaison, Joseph Salazar, signing the stipulation on behalf of all of the

defendants.

Case 1:07-cv-00388-DOC-SAB Document 34 Filed 08/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARDEROSIAN, 

RUNYON, CERCONE,

LEHMAN & ARMO

1260 Fulton Mall

Fresno, CA 93721 2

Upon review of the scheduling conference order submitted and filed by the court, it has been

determined that the scheduling conference order does not reflect the discussion which was had with

the Court at the time of the scheduling conference in all respects. The following amendments to the

scheduling conference order are proposed:

1. The initial Rule 26 disclosure date shall be October 15, 2007, instead of August 13,

2007;

2. The Rule 26 disclosure shall be updated quarterly for the first year and semi-annually

thereafter. 

3. Plaintiffs can be added to the above case without the necessity of filing a motion up

to and including April 1, 2008. 

Upon the Court signing the order below, the above amendments shall become effective

immediately. 

Dated: August 17, 2007 MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE

 LEHMAN & ARMO

By: /s/ Michael G. Marderosian 

 MICHAEL G. MARDEROSIAN,

 Attorney for Plaintiffs above named

Dated: August 17, 2007. LEWIS, BRISBOIS, BISGAARD & SMITH

By: /s/ Joseph A. Salazar 

 JOSEPH A. SALAZAR

 Liaison Attorney for All Defendants

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 17, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00388-DOC-SAB Document 34 Filed 08/22/07 Page 2 of 2