Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-05849/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-05849-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case No. C 02 5849 MJJ ADR

[Proposed] Order

FOX & ROBERTSON, P.C.

Timothy P. Fox, Cal. Bar No. 157750

Amy F. Robertson, Pro Hac Vice

910 - 16th Street, Suite 610

Denver, Colorado 80202

Tel: (303) 595-9700

Fax: (303) 595-9705

Email: tfox@foxrob.com

Mari Mayeda, Cal. Bar No. 110947

PO Box 5138

Berkeley, CA 94705

Tel: (510) 917-1622

Fax: (510) 841-8115

Email: marimayeda@earthlink.net

LAWSON LAW OFFICES

Antonio M. Lawson, Cal. Bar No. 140823

835 Mandana Blvd.

Oakland, CA 94610

Tel: (510) 419-0940

Fax: (501) 419-0948

Email: tony@lawsonlawoffices.com

THE IMPACT FUND

Brad Seligman, Cal. Bar No. 83838

Jocelyn Larkin, Cal. Bar No. 110817

125 University Ave.

Berkeley, CA 94710

Tel: (510) 845-3473

Fax: (510) 845-3654

Email: bseligman@impactfund.org

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

Gregory F. Hurley, Cal. Bar No. 126791

Richard H. Hikida, Cal. Bar No. 196149

3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 1000

Irvine, CA 92612-4410

Telephone: (949) 732-6500

Facsimile: (949) 732-6501

Email: hurleyg@gtlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

FRANCIE E. MOELLER et al,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

TACO BELL CORP., 

Defendant.

 

Case No. C 02 5849 MJJ ADR

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case 4:02-cv-05849-PJH Document 359 Filed 01/18/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case No. C 02 5849 MJJ ADR

[Proposed] Order

-2-

Following the status conference in this case on January 9, 2008, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. On or before January 16, 2008, Plaintiffs may file a response of no more than

five pages to Defendant’s November 12, 2008 Notice of Supplemental Authority in Support of

Defendant Taco Bell Corp.’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Motion

for Reconsideration of August 8, 2007 Order Granting in Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial

Summary Judgment. 

2. By January 18, 2008, Defendant will provide Plaintiffs the remainder of the

documents requested by Interrogatory No. 6 of Plaintiffs’ October 17, 2007 Interrogatories and

Requests for Production as to which Defendant does not assert a privilege. Between January

18 and 25, 2008, the parties shall meet and confer concerning Defendant’s claims of privilege. 

If the parties are unsuccessful in resolving their differences, Defendant shall provide a privilege

log to Plaintiff on or before February 1, 2008. 

3. If Plaintiffs elect to file a motion to compel concerning documents as to which

Defendant claims privilege, that motion must be filed by February 15, 2008. Defendant’s

response is due by February 29, 2008. Plaintiffs’ reply is due by March 7, 2008. 

4. By January 25, 2008, Plaintiffs will provide a supplemental response to

Defendants’ Interrogatory No. 2 setting forth proposed solutions to those barriers as to which

the readily achievable defense may apply.

5. Plaintiffs may serve an interrogatory relating to their Requests for Admission

Nos. 23 through 97 (relating to alterations). Plaintiffs shall not serve an interrogatory relating

to their Requests for Admission Nos. 1-22 or 98-100. Defendant’s responses to Plaintiffs’

Second Set of Requests for Admission to Taco Bell Corp. (served December 20, 2007) and the

associated interrogatories are due on March 10, 2008. 

Case 4:02-cv-05849-PJH Document 359 Filed 01/18/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case No. C 02 5849 MJJ ADR

[Proposed] Order

-3-

6. Both parties may serve interrogatories requesting the other party to state its

views on appropriate tolerances. Responses to those interrogatories are due on March 10,

2008. 

7. The parties shall meet and confer concerning Plaintiffs’ proposed limitation to

their Interrogatory Nos. 2 and 3 of Plaintiffs’ October 17, 2007 Interrogatories and Requests

for Production. By January 18, 2008, the parties shall submit either an agreed proposed order

or separate proposed orders relating to Defendant’s obligation to respond to these

interrogatories. 

8. On or before March 10, 2008, Defendant shall respond to Plaintiffs’ December

11, 2007 Interrogatories and Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendant’s Interrogatory No. 19. 

9. On or before March 10, 2008, Plaintiffs will provide verifications by all named

Plaintiffs to interrogatory responses. 

10. Plaintiffs’ objections to Defendant’s Interrogatory Nos. [4, 5,] 9, 12, 13 and 16

are sustained. 

11. A status conference will be held in this case at 2:30 p.m. on March 19, 2008. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _______________ 

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins

United States District Court

4, 5, 9, 12, 13, & 16 1/18/2008

Case 4:02-cv-05849-PJH Document 359 Filed 01/18/08 Page 3 of 3