Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00454/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00454-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONNY WHITE,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

J. WALKER, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:12-cv-00454-LJO-GSA-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION 

BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, 

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 

UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE 

GRANTED

(Doc. 1.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN THIRTY 

DAYS

Donny White ("Plaintiff"), a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, filed the Complaint commencing this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983 

on March 26, 2012. (Doc. 1.) On March 17, 2015, the Court dismissed Plaintiff=s Complaint 

for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A; 28 

U.S.C. ' 1915(e). (Doc. 9.) On April 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of intent not to file an 

amended complaint. (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff states in the notice that he “intend[s] to stand on his 

complaint rather than amend it and to appeal any order dismissing the complaint and/or action 

which may result.” (Id.) The deadline to amend the Complaint has expired, and Plaintiff has 

not filed an amended complaint. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any 

claims upon which relief may be granted.

Case 1:12-cv-00454-LJO-GSA Document 14 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A 

and 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e), this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff=s failure 

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section 1983, and that this dismissal be 

subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658 

F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(l). Within thirty 

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate 

Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 

772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 

1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 1, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00454-LJO-GSA Document 14 Filed 05/01/15 Page 2 of 2