Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01193/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01193-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar #69888 

ADANTE D. POINTER, Esq./State Bar #236229 

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 

Airport Corporate Centre 

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 

Oakland, California 94621 

Telephone: (510) 839-5200 

Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TIMOTHY C. NELSON, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF DAVIS, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

 / 

 No. 2:05-cv-1193-MCE-KJM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

EXPERT DISCLOSURE CUT-OFF 

 

Certificate of Disclosure: 

COME NOW all parties and submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Expert 

Disclosure Cut-Off. The parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Expert Disclosure Cut-Off 

date set by this court for September 5, 2006 be reset to September 22, 2006. The certified court 

reporter that recorded several key depositions taken during the course of fact-discovery has yet to 

produce the transcripts for the aforementioned depositions. It is anticipated that these transcripts will 

be tendered to all parties by September 6, 2006 with each party giving relevant transcripts to their 

respective experts for review. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01193-MCE-CKD Document 31 Filed 09/07/06 Page 1 of 2
 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

As a result, both parties and their retained experts need additional time to receive and review 

the deposition transcripts. Therefore, good cause being shown all parties stipulate and respectfully 

request that the Expert Disclosure Cut-Off date set by this court for September 5, 2006 be reset to 

September 22, 2006. 

Dated: , 2006 The Law Offices of John L. Burris

 ________/s/ Adanté Pointer_________ 

 Adanté D. Pointer, Esq. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff TIMOTHY NELSON 

Dated: , 2006 Angelo, Kilday, Kilduff LLP 

 ________/s/ Doug Thorn 

 Douglas Thorn, Esq. 

 Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF DAVIS, 

HYDE, WILSON & MASON 

Dated: , 2006 Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & 

Birney, LLP

 __ /s/ Kelli Kennaday_______ 

 Kelli Kennaday, Esq. 

 Attorneys for Defendant CALVIN CHANG 

Dated: , 2006 Gordon & Rees

 _____/s/ Mark Posard_____________

 Mark Posard, Esq. 

 Attorneys for Defendant HANDY, BARAGAN 

& GARCIA 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE: September 7, 2006 

______________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01193-MCE-CKD Document 31 Filed 09/07/06 Page 2 of 2