Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00270/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00270-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cesar Robert Franco, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Greg Fizer, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-270-TUC-FRZ (JCG)

 ORDER

Before the Court for consideration is Petitioner’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus by a Person in State Custody, pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. § 2254, alleging four

grounds of due process violations.

This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for all pretrial

proceedings and report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1) and LRCiv 72.1 and LRCiv 72.2, Rules of Practice of the United States District

Court for the District of Arizona.

Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Guerin issued her Report and Recommendation, filed

October 11, 2007, recommending that the District Court, after its independent review of the

record, enter an order dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as time barred under

28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).

Petitioner filed his Objection to Report and Recommendation on October 29, 2007.

Case 4:06-cv-00270-FRZ Document 13 Filed 12/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Court, having made an independent review of the record herein, including

Petitioner’s objection, finds that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Guerin

shall be adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court.

Based on the foregoing, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #11] is hereby

ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DENIED and that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

DATED this 3rd day of December, 2008.

Case 4:06-cv-00270-FRZ Document 13 Filed 12/04/08 Page 2 of 2