Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00105/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00105-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUBEN GARCIA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

JEFF WRIGLEY, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-cv-00105-AWI-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 5)

ORDER GRANTING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER THAT RESPONDENT

CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATENESS

OF TRANSFERRING PETITIONER

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On February 12, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

GRANTED, and Respondent be ORDERED to consider the appropriateness

of transferring Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set

forth in § 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed

appropriate by the BOP, without reference to the BOP policy

promulgated in December 2002 and without reference to the BOP's

February 14, 2005, amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. These Findings

and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice

Case 1:07-cv-00105-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 05/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

that any objections were to be filed within ten (10) days from the

date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed

objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 12,

2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED; and,

3. Respondent consider the appropriateness of transferring

Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set forth in

§ 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed appropriate by

the BOP, without reference to the BOP policy promulgated in

December 2002 and without reference to the BOP's February 14, 2005,

amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21, within fourteen (14) days from the

date of service of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00105-AWI-DLB Document 6 Filed 05/14/07 Page 2 of 2