Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-mc-00002/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-mc-00002-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DANA LANTHIER, 

 Defendant and Judgment Debtor.

JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT LLC, 

(and its Successors and Assignees)

 Garnishee.

Case No.: 1:20-MC-00002-SKO

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 

FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT 

(RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO RANDOMLY 

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS 

MATTER

Criminal Case No.: 1:10-CR-00214-LJO

The Court, having reviewed its files and the United States of America’s Request for Findings and 

Recommendations for Final Order of Garnishment (Retirement Accounts), (Doc. 7), and good cause 

appearing therefore, hereby recommends a final order of garnishment be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that:

1. The United States’ Request for Findings and Recommendations for Final Order of 

Garnishment, (Doc. 7), be GRANTED;

2. Garnishee Janney Montgomery Scott LLC be directed to pay the Clerk of the United 

States District Court $8,458.33 of the funds in the accounts held by Garnishee, in which Dana Lanthier

aka Dana Milgrim has an interest, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Final Order;

Case 1:20-mc-00002-AWI-SKO Document 9 Filed 02/12/20 Page 1 of 2
2 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

3. Payment shall be made in the form of a cashier’s check, money order or company draft, 

made payable to the Clerk of the Court and delivered to the United States District Court, Eastern District 

of California, 501 I Street, Room 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814. The criminal docket number 

(1:10-CR-00214-LJO) shall be stated on the payment instrument;

4. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve matters through ancillary proceedings in the 

case, if necessary; and 

5. This garnishment shall be terminated when the payment is deposited with the Clerk of the 

Court. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned 

to the case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served 

with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve 

a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed with the court and served on all 

parties within fourteen days after service of the objections. E.D. Cal. L.R. 304(d). Failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 1991). 

The Clerk is directed to randomly assign a District Judge to this matter. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2020 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-mc-00002-AWI-SKO Document 9 Filed 02/12/20 Page 2 of 2