Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03910/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03910-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL GUNTER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN

DEVELOPMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 05-03910 JSW

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS AND EXTENDING

TIME TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT

On December 27, 2005, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s application to

proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his complaint with leave to amend. The Court

provided Plaintiff until January 23, 2006 to file a comprehensible complaint. On December 29,

2006, Plaintiff filed the following three motions: 1) motion for peremptory challenge, 2) request

for renotice of hearing, and 3) motion for summary judgment. Because the Plaintiff’s complaint

was dismissed and Plaintiff has not yet filed an amended complaint, the Court HEREBY

DENIES Plaintiff’s motions without prejudice to refiling after he files a comprehensible

complaint. 

The Court FURTHER ORDERS that Plaintiff’s time to file a comprehensible complaint

is EXTENDED until February 23, 2006. Plaintiff’s amended complaint shall comply with

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) by setting forth the grounds upon which this Court has

jurisdiction, “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to

relief, . . . and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks.” Plaintiff is advised that

Case 3:05-cv-03910-JSW Document 11 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

his failure to file timely an amended complaint shall result in dismissal of this action without

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2006 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-03910-JSW Document 11 Filed 01/23/06 Page 2 of 2