Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01491/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01491-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUBEN J. BONTTY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1491 GEB KJM P

vs.

CAPTAIN S. J. VANCE, et al., 

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On July 29, 2004, plaintiff filed a complaint for violation of civil rights under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. With his complaint, plaintiff submitted an incomplete application to proceed in

forma pauperis. On August 31, 2004, the court ordered plaintiff to submit a new application to

proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was specifically informed that the “certificate” portion of

the application appearing on page 2 must be completed and, with his application, plaintiff must

submit a certified copy of his prisoner trust account statement for the preceding six months. 

Plaintiff was informed that failure to comply with the court’s August 31 order would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

On September 7, 2004, plaintiff submitted a second application to proceed in

forma pauperis. However, the “certificate” section found on page 2 is, again, incomplete and

plaintiff did not submit the required copy of his prisoner trust account statement.

Case 2:04-cv-01491-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 06/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 27, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

bont1630.fifp

Case 2:04-cv-01491-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 06/28/05 Page 2 of 2