Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00290/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00290-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 625
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. $16,200.00 

2. $13,500.00

3. $150,000.00

4. 2005 Honda CBR 1000 CC Motorcycle,

Defendants.

 CIV-06-0290-PHX-SMM

STIPULATED JUDGMENT

CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE

CAUSE

Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its attorney, DANIEL G.

KNAUSS United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, and his Assistant, Lisa

Roberts, Assistant United States Attorney, and Claimants, Angel R. Olmedo, through his

criminal attorney, Stephen G. Ralls, and Cecelia Olmedo through counsel, Tonya J.

Peterson, present this stipulation regarding their interest in the above captioned defendant

real property, to resolve this matter. There being no objection and the Court finding good

cause, it is hereby ordered that the Stipulation, and the facts contained therein, are

adopted by the Court. Accordingly, 

Case 2:06-cv-00290-SMM Document 27 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant property consisting of

$16,200.00 in U.S. Currency; $13,500.00 in U.S. Currency; $150,000.00 in U.S.

Currency; and one 2005 Honda CBR 1000 CC Motorcycle is hereby declared forfeited to

the United States, pursuant to the provisions of to 21 U.S.C. § 881 and 18 U.S.C. §981,

and is to be disposed of according to law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Claimants Alfredo Santillan, Georgina

Santillan, and Jesus Alberto Osuna's claims filed in this action are hereby withdrawn.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Claimants release and forever discharge the

United States and the Department of Justice, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and

the United States Treasury Department and all officers, employees, contract employees,

agents, and task force agents from any and all actions, causes of action, suits,

proceedings, debts, dues, contracts, judgments, damages, claims, and/or demands

whatsoever in law or equity which Claimants, their heirs, successors, or assigns ever had,

now have, or may have in the future in connection with the seizure, detention, and

forfeiture of the above-captioned defendant.

The Court finds that the agents of the United States and the Department of Justice,

the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the United States Treasury Department had

reasonable grounds to seize defendant property described herein, pursuant to the terms of

28 U.S.C. §2465, and that Claimants have not substantially prevailed as the result of this

settlement agreement. 

 Each party is responsible for its respective costs and attorney fees.

DATED this 25th day of April, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00290-SMM Document 27 Filed 04/26/07 Page 2 of 2