Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-01179/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-01179-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LASER DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, LLC;

NORWOOD OPERATING COMPANY,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

BJ CRYSTAL, INC, a California corporation;

CASHMAN PHOTO ENTERPRISES OF

NEVADA, a Nevada corporation; CRYSTAL

MAGIC, INC., a Florida Corporation; U.C.

LASER, INC., a New Jersey corporation;

VITRO LASER GROUP U.S.A., INC., a

Nevada corporation; JIMAC MARKETING

INC., a Canadian corporation; CONCORD

INDUSTRIES, INC., a Connecticut

corporation; C. STIEFELMAYER GMBH &

Co. KG, a German limited partnership;

CERION GMBH, a German limited liability

company; CRYSTAL CAPTURE INC., a

Texas corporation; CRYSTAL CAPTURE

INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a Nevada limited

liability company; G.W. PARTNERS

INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California

corporation; HIRSCH GIFT INC., a Texas

corporation; VISIONS IN CRYSTAL, INC., a

California corporation; VITRO LASER

GMBH, a German limited liability company,

Defendants.

 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

 /

Lead Case No. C 03-1179 JSW

Consolidated with No. C 03-3905 JSW

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE SECOND

AMENDED CONSOLIDATED

COMPLAINT

Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion For Leave to File Second Amended

Consolidated Complaint for Patent Infringement. Defendants have filed a statement of nonCase 3:03-cv-01179-JSW Document 243 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

opposition to the Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend. Accordingly, in light of the lack of

opposition by the parties to these motions, and in light of the liberal standards set forth in

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file its

Second Amended Consolidated Complaint for Patent Infringement. The hearing date noticed

for October 7, 2005 is HEREBY VACATED.

Plaintiffs shall file their Second Amended Consolidated Complaint for Patent

Infringement within twenty (10) days of the date of this Order. Defendants shall file a

responsive pleading or appropriate motion within twenty (20) days after service of the Second

Amended Consolidated Complaint for Patent Infringement. 

The Court FURTHER ORDERS that Plaintiff’s pending motion for administrative relief

to file documents under seal is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 21, 2005 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-01179-JSW Document 243 Filed 09/21/05 Page 2 of 2