Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235-155/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 09-cv-05235-MMC 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' 

REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION

Re: Dkt. No. 983

Before the Court is defendants’ Request for Leave to File a Statement of Recent 

Decision, filed July 27, 2016, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(d). Also before the Court 

are plaintiff’s Objections thereto, filed July 28, 2016. 

Civil Local Rule 7-3(d) provides, in relevant part, as follows: “Before the noticed 

hearing date, counsel may bring to the Court’s attention a relevant judicial opinion 

published after the date the opposition or reply was filed by filing and serving a Statement 

of Recent Decision, containing a citation to and providing a copy of the new opinion—

without argument.” See Civil L.R. 7-3(d)(2). To the extent Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)(2) may 

be deemed applicable to decisions submitted after the noticed hearing date, here, as 

plaintiff points out, the proposed filing is more than “a citation to and . . . copy of the new 

opinion.” See id. 

Accordingly, the Request is hereby GRANTED as to Exhibit B attached thereto, 

which the Court will consider, and in all other respects the Request is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 3, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 985 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 1