Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02329/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02329-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF #1093548 v1 -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR FRANK SCOTT TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

Dennis L. Kennelly, Esq., CA Bar No. 064916 

Law Office of Dennis L. Kennelly 

1030 Curtis Street, Suite 200 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 853-1291 

Facsimle: (650) 854-7839 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

RONALD M. MAROVICH 

Seth L. Neulight, CA Bar No. 184440 

Deborah R. Schwartz, CA Bar No. 208934 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, California 94105-3601 

Telephone: (415) 371-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 371-1211 

Ann Kane Smith, CA Bar No. 72698 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

333 South Hope Street, Suite 2900 

Los Angeles, California 90071-3048 

Telephone: (213) 576-8000 

Facsimile: (213) 576-8080 

Attorneys for Defendants 

DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. and FRANK SCOTT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RONALD M. MAROVICH, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., a 

Corporation, FRANK SCOTT, an individual, 

and DOES I through X, inclusive 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: C 06-02329 TEH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME 

FOR DEFENDANT FRANK SCOTT TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Ronald M. Marovich (“Plaintiff”) intends to file a Motion for 

Remand, and defendant Frank Scott (“Scott”) intends to file a Motion to Dismiss; and 

Case 3:06-cv-02329-TEH Document 16 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF #1093548 v1 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR FRANK SCOTT TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT THELEN REID

& PRIEST LLP

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Scott have stipulated and proposed to the Court that their 

respective motions be briefed and heard concurrently; and 

WHEREAS, based upon the current schedule of Plaintiff’s counsel, Plaintiff does not 

have sufficient time to prepare his Motion for Remand by August 21, the existing deadline for 

Scott’s response to the Complaint, 

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Scott hereby stipulate that the deadline for Scott to 

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended further, to and including September 18, 2006. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: August 16, 2006 LAW OFFICE OF DENNIS L. KENNELLY 

By /s/ Dennis L. Kennelly 

Dennis L. Kennelly 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 

Dated: August 16, 2006 THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

By /s/ Seth L. Neulight 

Seth L. Neulight 

Attorneys for Defendants 

DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. and FRANK 

SCOTT 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the deadline for defendant Frank Scott’s response to the 

Complaint shall be extended to and including September 18, 2006. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:_______________ ______________________________________________ 

 HONORABLE THELTON E. HENDERSON 

 United States District Judge 

08/17/06

Case 3:06-cv-02329-TEH Document 16 Filed 08/17/06 Page 2 of 2