Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_98-cv-01277/USCOURTS-azd-2_98-cv-01277-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The Court denied Petitioner’s motion for a new trial in an Order filed July 26,

2006. (Dkt. 82.) In the document addressed to the Court, Petitioner indicates his

disagreement with the Court’s findings and objects to counsel’s characterization, in the

motion for a new trial, of his relationship to one of the trial witnesses. The Court notes that

its ruling on the claim of prosecutorial misconduct did not take into account counsel’s

statement that the witness Hill was Petitioner’s ex-girlfriend.

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Eric John King, ) No. CV 98-1277-PHX-RCB

)

Petitioner, )

v. ) ORDER

)

Dora Schriro, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

)

Petitioner has addressed a document to the Court dated August 2, 2006, with the

heading “Supplement, Attach on New Trial Motion.”1

 Petitioner is represented by counsel,

Daniel Maynard, and all matters submitted to the Court must be presented through counsel.

See Rule 83.3(c)(2), Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of

Arizona. Accordingly, Petitioner’s document is not properly before the Court, and it will not

be considered.

Based on the foregoing,

IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court forward a copy of this Order and a copy of

Petitioner’s document dated August 2, 2006, to Petitioner’s counsel, Daniel Maynard. 

Case 2:98-cv-01277-RCB Document 84 Filed 08/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court forward a copy of this Order

to Petitioner Eric King, ADOC # 46518, SMU II, PO Box 3400, Florence, AZ 85232, and

that Petitioner’s document dated August 2, 2006, be placed on the left side of the Court’s

case file, with no further action taken.

DATED this 23rd day of August, 2006.

Case 2:98-cv-01277-RCB Document 84 Filed 08/25/06 Page 2 of 2