Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. 

___________________________________/

No. C15-0262 EMC

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

DEFER BRIEFING AND

CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; EXTENDING SUMMARY

JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE

On March 31, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment, seeking a

determination from this Court that they are employees as a matter of Massachusetts state law. 

Docket No. 38. On April 6, 2015, Defendants filed an administrative motion to defer briefing and

consideration of Plaintiffs’ motion until after class certification. Docket No. 40. Alternatively,

Defendants argue that consideration of the Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion should be deferred

at least until after the initial Case Management Conference takes place and Defendants are allowed

to take discovery from Plaintiffs. Id. 

The Court will permit Plaintiffs to file a slightly enlarged opposition brief to Defendants’

administrative motion. The opposition shall not contain more than eight (8) pages of text, and shall

be filed by Friday, April 10, 2015. See N.D. Cal. Local Rule 7-11(b) (providing that an opposition

to an administrative motion “must be filed no later than 4 days after the motion has been filed”). 

Defendants will be permitted to file an optional three (3) page reply brief, such brief to be filed no

later than Monday, April 13, 2015. 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 41 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment is currently due

Tuesday, April 14, 2015, and Plaintiffs’ reply is due April 21, 2015. See Docket No. 38. The Court

hereby extends those deadlines by one week to give the Court sufficient time to consider the merits

of Defendants’ administrative motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 7, 2015

_________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 41 Filed 04/07/15 Page 2 of 2