Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-md-01699/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-md-01699-1311/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX

MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,

 /

This document relates to:

Robin Adams, No. 05-4494 CRB

___________________________________/

No. MDL 05-01699 CRB

ORDER RE: MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL AND FOR

PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

Now pending for decision is the motion of the attorney Roger DeMik to withdraw as

counsel for plaintiff in the above action. 

After carefully considering the motion, and the supporting affidavit, the Court

ORDERS PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE as to why (1) DeMik’s motion to withdraw

should not be granted; and (2) plaintiff’s lawsuit should not be dismissed for a lack of

prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. If plaintiff wishes to contest the withdrawal of counsel

and/or dismissal of the plaintiff’s lawsuit for failure to prosecute, plaintiff shall notify the

Court in writing on or before May 9, 2010, of the reasons the withdrawal should not be

granted or the case dismissed. In particular, if plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action,

she shall advise the Court of the name and address of her new counsel or, if she will be

representing herself, she must advise the Court of her current contact information. Plaintiff 

Case 3:05-md-01699-CRB Document 3320 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\showcauseorders\RobinAdamsOsc.wpd 2

is warned that her failure to communicate with the Court in writing as set forth above may

result in dismissal of her action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 6, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-md-01699-CRB Document 3320 Filed 04/06/10 Page 2 of 2