Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06603/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06603-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on May 15, 2006, as undeliverable. 

1

A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Out of Custody. However, plaintiff has not notified the

court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. See Local

Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH D. GOLDEN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COLLIER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06603-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 11)

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT/

ACTION

Plaintiff, Kenneth D. Golden (“plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On April 24, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. To

date, plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.1

//

Case 1:04-cv-06603-OWW -LJO Document 13 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 24, 2006,

are ADOPTED in full; and,

2. The Complaint, and therefore this action, is DISMISSED

pursuant to Local Rule 11-110, and for plaintiff’s failure to

obey the court’s order of March 15, 2006, and failure to state a

claim upon which relief can be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 1, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06603-OWW -LJO Document 13 Filed 06/02/06 Page 2 of 2