Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00672/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00672-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PARTICIPATION OF AMICUS CURIAE 

LAW PROFESSORS REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS 

Case No. C-06-0672-VRW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Lauren Gelman, State Bar No. 228734 

Jennifer Stisa Granick, State Bar No. 168423 

STANFORD LAW SCHOOL 

CYBERLAW CLINIC 

CENTER FOR INTERNET & SOCIETY 

Crown Quadrangle 

559 Nathan Abbott Way 

Stanford, California 94305-8610 

Telephone: (650) 724-3358 

Facsimile: (650) 723-4426 

E-mail: gelman@stanford.edu 

Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Law Professors 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS, 

CAROLYN JEWEL, and ERIC KNUTZEN 

On Behalf of Themselves and All Others 

Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

AT&T CORPORATION, AT&T 

INCORPORATED, and DOES 1-2, 

Inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: C 06-0672-VRW 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 

PARTICIPATION OF AMICUS CURIAE 

LAW PROFESSORS REGARDING 

MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE 

ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT BY THE INTERVENOR 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Hearing Date: June 21, 2006 

Judge: The Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor 

Case 3:06-cv-00672-VRW Document 232-2 Filed 06/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cv-00672-VRW Document 322 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PARTICIPATION OF AMICUS CURIAE 

LAW PROFESSORS REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS 

Case No. C-06-0672-VRW 

-1- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pursuant to the Application Re: Participation of Amici Curiae Law Professors 

regarding Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment by the 

Intervenor United States of America, and Good Cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Amici Curiae Law Professors may file a brief to 

be lodged on June 16, 2006 regarding whether this Court should dismiss the abovecaptioned case on states secrets grounds asserted by the Intervenor United States in its 

Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment. 

Dated: June _____, 2006 ____________________________________ 

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

United States Chief District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-00672-VRW Document 232-2 Filed 06/16/2006 Page 2 of 2

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:06-cv-00672-VRW Document 322 Filed 07/31/06 Page 2 of 2