Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05644/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05644-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

NOU-29-2006 15:51 ORRlCK HERRINGTON 

DA'N COLESI.1, et, el. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN'IA 

v. 

MORGAN STANLEY DW INC., et, at. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel repQrt that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and havc rcachcd the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-.S: 

The parties agree to participal in thc following ADR process: 

Court Processes: 

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

Mediation (ADR L,R, 6) 

(Nore: Pnrties who believe that an early settlement conferotcc with a Magiswale Judge is 

crpyreciably more likely to meet their needs rhan any ather foirn 01-ADA, must participate in an 

AUR phone conjkrence and may not file thisfort~i. They must irtstecrdJlr a Notice of Need fur 

AUR Pl~one Car ference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 und ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process: 

Private ADR (please identfiprocess and provider) M'~1.k Rudy, Esq., 

IEutly, Exelrod iYc Zicff, LLP, 351 California Street, Ste. 700, San Frnnciuco, CA 941 04 

The parties agrcc to hold the ADR session by: 

J the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days,fiom the date offhe order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise otdered.) 

other requested deadline 

Dntccl: Nov, 29, 2006 

Dared: NOV~~ zoos 

Attomey for. plaint@ 

Case 4:06-cv-05644-PJH Document 28 Filed 12/04/06 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

Non-binding Arbitration 

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 

Mediation 

d Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session 

d 90 days from the date of this order. 

other 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

12/4/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-05644-PJH Document 28 Filed 12/04/06 Page 2 of 2