Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-00190/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-00190-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Michael Clark, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Kathleen Allison, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:22-cv-00190-KJM-JDP (PS) 

ORDER 

On February 14, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on February 22, 

2024, and they were considered by the undersigned. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 14, 2024, are adopted; 

 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 13, is granted; 

3. Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment due process and state law negligence claims are 

dismissed without leave to amend; 

Case 2:22-cv-00190-DC-JDP Document 20 Filed 03/28/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

4. This action proceed on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim; and 

5. This action is referred back to the assigned magistrate for all further pretrial 

proceedings. 

DATED: March 27, 2024. 

Case 2:22-cv-00190-DC-JDP Document 20 Filed 03/28/24 Page 2 of 2