Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01536/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01536-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN D. LEWIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1536 MCE GGH PS

vs.

BILL SCHAUFLER, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed September 15, 2009, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff

of the deficiencies in his complaint. On November 13, 2009, plaintiff was granted a twenty-eight

day extension of time to file his amended complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s

order.

Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the

reasons given in the September 15, 2009, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this

action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

Case 2:09-cv-01536-MCE -GGH Document 7 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 15, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

lewis1536.fta

Case 2:09-cv-01536-MCE -GGH Document 7 Filed 01/15/10 Page 2 of 2