Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-03476/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-03476-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-03476-SC

KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842

Email: keggleton@wsgr.com

RODNEY G. STRICKLAND, State Bar No. 161934

Email: rstrickland@wsgr.com

LUKE A. LISS, State Bar No. 247520

Email: lliss@wsgr.com

PHILIP K. RUCKER, State Bar No. 281318

Email: prucker@wsgr.com

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

650 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050

Telephone: (650) 493-9300

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811

Attorneys for Defendants

Polycom, Inc., Michael R. Kourey,

and Eric F. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MARK NATHANSON, Individually and On

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

POLYCOM, INC., ANDREW M. MILLER,

MICHAEL R. KOUREY, and ERIC F. BROWN,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 3:13-cv-03476-SC

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

SCHEDULING ORDER

Case 4:13-cv-03476-YGR Document 82 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-03476-SC

-1-

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, the parties respectfully submit

the following Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order regarding a briefing schedule for

defendants Polycom, Inc., Michael R. Kourey, Eric F. Brown, and Andrew M. Miller’s

(collectively, “Defendants”) response(s) to the Second Amended Complaint for Violations of the

Federal Securities Laws (ECF No. 79) (the “Second Amended Complaint”).

WHEREAS, on February 24, 2014, Mark Nathanson (“Lead Plaintiff”) filed the First

Amended Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (the “First Amended

Complaint”) (ECF No. 47);

WHEREAS, Defendants moved to dismiss the First Amended Complaint on April 25,

2014 (ECF Nos. 51, 53);

WHEREAS, on April 3, 2015, the Court granted in part, and denied in part, Defendants’

motions to dismiss (ECF No. 72), providing Lead Plaintiff thirty days leave, until May 4, 2015,

to amend his complaint;

WHEREAS, on May 4, 2015, Lead Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, Defendants will move to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, upon a briefing

schedule for Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint.

NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, the parties hereby stipulate and

agree as follows:

(1) Defendants shall file their motion(s) to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint by

no later than June 18, 2015;

(2) Lead Plaintiff shall file his opposition brief(s) to Defendants’ motion(s) to dismiss

by no later than August 3, 2015;

(3) Defendants shall file their reply brief(s) in support of their motion(s) to dismiss by

no later than August 31, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 4:13-cv-03476-YGR Document 82 Filed 05/05/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO.: 3:13-cv-03476-SC

-2-

Dated: May 5, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Keith E. Eggleton

Keith E. Eggleton

keggleton@wsgr.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Polycom, Inc., Eric Brown, and Michael

Kourey

Dated: May 5, 2015 By: /s/ Philip T. Besirof

Philip T. Besirof

pbesirof@mofo.com

MORRISON FOERSTER

PAUL T. FRIEDMAN

PHILIP T. BESIROF

425 Market Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-2482

Telephone: (415) 268-7000

Facsimile: (415) 268-7522

Attorneys for Defendant Andrew M. Miller

Dated: May 5, 2015 By: /s/ Emma Gilmore

Emma Gilmore

egilmore@pomlaw.com

POMERANTZ LLP

JEREMY A. LIEBERMAN

EMMA GILMORE

600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor

New York, New York 10016

Telephone: (212) 661-1100

Facsimile: (212) 661-8665

POMERANTZ LLP

PATRICK V. DAHLSTROM

10 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3505

Chicago, IL 60603

Telephone: (312) 377-1181

Facsimile: (312) 377-1184

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff Mark Nathanson

I, Keith E. Eggleton, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this

Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby

attest that Philip T. Besirof and Emma Gilmore have concurred in this filing.

Case 4:13-cv-03476-YGR Document 82 Filed 05/05/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO.: 3:13-cv-03476-SC

-3-

DECLARATION OF KEITH E. EGGLETON

I, Keith E. Eggleton, declare:

1. I am a member of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., counsel for defendants

Polycom, Inc., Michael R. Kourey, and Eric F. Brown. I make this declaration in support of the

parties’ Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order. The parties seek to adjust the default time

frames set forth in the Local Rules and the Federal Rules with regard to responding to Lead

Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint to an appropriate schedule.

2. This is the parties’ eighth request for a modification of time, and first with respect

to the Second Amended Complaint. The parties previously filed stipulations to extend the time to

respond to (previously operative) complaints on September 23, 2013 (ECF No. 17), and December

30, 2013 (ECF No. 45). Both of these stipulations were approved by the Court (see ECF Nos. 18,

46). Additionally, the parties have filed six stipulated requests to continue the Initial Case

Management Conference; these were filed on September 23, 2013 (ECF No. 17), December 9,

2013 (ECF No. 36), April 4, 2014 (ECF No. 49), November 21, 2014 (ECF No. 64), January 2,

2015 (ECF No. 66), and February 6, 2015 (ECF No. 69). The Court granted these six previous

requests (see ECF Nos. 18, 39, 50, 65, 67, 68, 70).

3. The proposed briefing schedule will not impact any other deadlines or dates set by

the Court.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May

5, 2015 in Palo Alto, California.

By: /s/ Keith E. Eggleton

Keith E. Eggleton

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI

United States District Judge

5/5/15

Case 4:13-cv-03476-YGR Document 82 Filed 05/05/15 Page 4 of 4