Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05198/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05198-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALICIA HARRIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

No. C-08-5198 EMC

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO QUASH; AND GRANTING

IN PART, DENYING IN PART, AND

DEFERRING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL 30(b)(6)

DEPOSITION

(Docket Nos. 186, 190)

On July 21, 2010, the Court held a hearing on two discovery motions filed by Plaintiff: (1) a

motion to quash and (2) a motion to compel. This order memorializes the rulings made by the Court

at the hearing.

(1) The motion to quash is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant is entitled to

information verifying that Plaintiff attended and/or graduated from the schools at issue. The

information shall be provided by July 28, 2010. The remaining information sought by Defendant

shall not be produced.

(2) The motion to compel is granted in part, denied, in part, and deferred in part.

(a) The motion is denied with respect to Plaintiff’s request for a 30(b)(6)

deposition on the subject matter of the disposition of the knife sample kit upon being returned by a

Sales Rep to Defendant.

(b) The motion is granted to the extent Plaintiff seeks information about the sales

completed by Sales Reps in the period soon after completing the initial training. The motion is

Case 3:08-cv-05198-EMC Document 211 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

deferred with respect to Plaintiff’s request for information about the compensation received by Sales

Reps. Plaintiff shall have until July 23, 2010, to file evidence supporting her contention that

Defendant engaged in more than mere puffery regarding the amount of money earned by Sales Reps. 

Defendant shall have until July 27, 2010, to file a response to Plaintiff’s evidentiary submission.

(c) The motion is denied with respect to Plaintiff’s request for information about

the compensation of managers.

(d) The motion is granted with respect to Plaintiff’s request for information about

Sales Reps younger than eighteen years of age.

(e) The motion is denied with respect to Plaintiff’s request for information about

advanced training.

This order disposes of Docket Nos. 186 and 190.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 23, 2010

_________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05198-EMC Document 211 Filed 07/23/10 Page 2 of 2