Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02196/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02196-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OLEGS KOZACENKO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 

OFFICER ANDREW P. MURRILL, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:12-cv-2196 MCE DAD

ORDER

 This matter came before the court on June 13, 2014, for hearing of plaintiff’s motions to 

compel. Attorney Stewart Katz appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. Deputy Attorney General 

Alberto L. Gonzalez and Deputy Attorney General Neli N. Palma appeared on behalf of the 

defendants. 

 Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set 

forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to interrogatories (Dkt. No. 44) is 

granted as modified on the record; 

 2. On or before July 11, 2014, defendants shall produce to plaintiff records of 

phone calls placed on the requested defendants’ personal cell phones relating to the incident that 

is the subject of this action from the moment the incident began until midnight that same day; 

Case 2:12-cv-02196-MCE-DAD Document 52 Filed 06/16/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 3. Defendants may redact all information related to any calls not relevant to the 

incident at issue and may redact unnecessary information as to relevant calls so long as the 

receiver of the call is identified; and 

 4. Within seven days of the date of this order, defendants shall advise the court the 

date upon which the Office of the Attorney General first received the Form 268 placed at issue by 

plaintiff’s motion to compel and which has been submitted to the court has for in camera review . 

Dated: June 13, 2014 

DAD:6 

Ddad1\orders.civil\kozacenko2196.oah.061314 

Case 2:12-cv-02196-MCE-DAD Document 52 Filed 06/16/14 Page 2 of 2