Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00166/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00166-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG; -01385; -02359; -02360; -02894; -02895; 15-00165; -00166; 

-00167; -00168 

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ADAPTIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

AMAZON.COM, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

ADAPTIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 

et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 5:14-cv-01385-PSG

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

ADAPTIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

HTC CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 5:14-cv-02359-PSG

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-00166-LB Document 222 Filed 05/14/15 Page 1 of 4
2 

Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG; -01385; -02359; -02360; -02894; -02895; 15-00165; -00166; 

-00167; -00168 

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

ADAPTIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

HTC CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 5:14-cv-02360-PSG

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

ADAPTIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

KYOCERA CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 5:14-cv-02894-PSG

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

ADAPTIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

KYOCERA CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 5:14-cv-02895-PSG

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

ADAPTIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 5:15-cv-00165-PSG

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

ADAPTIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 5:15-cv-00166-PSG

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-00166-LB Document 222 Filed 05/14/15 Page 2 of 4
3 

Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG; -01385; -02359; -02360; -02894; -02895; 15-00165; -00166; 

-00167; -00168 

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

ADAPTIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 5:15-cv-00167-PSG

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

ADAPTIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

ZTE CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 5:15-cv-00168-PSG

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

Plaintiff Adaptix, Inc. claims Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Sony Mobile 

Communications, Inc., HTC Corporation, Kyocera Corporation, ZTE Corporation, Verizon 

Wireless, Dell, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and Sprint Spectrum L.P. infringe United States Patent 

Nos. 6,947,748 and 7,454,212. Consistent with Pat. L.R. 4-3(c), the parties seek construction of 

one claim term.

1

 The parties appeared for a hearing on the matters at hand earlier today. To avoid 

unnecessary delay, the court proceeds to issue its construction without its full reasoning and 

analysis:

PATENT 

NO.

CLAIM TERM/PHRASE CONSTRUCTION

’212 “continuously monitors” “checks without interruption” 

The parties should rest assured that the court arrived at these constructions with a full 

appreciation of not only the relevant intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, but also the Federal Circuit’s 

teaching in Phillips v. AWH Corp.,

2

 and its progeny. So that the parties may pursue whatever 

recourse they believe is necessary, a complete opinion will issue before entry of any judgment.

 

1 See Case No. 14-cv-01379: Docket No. 139. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, the court adopts 

by reference its ruling on claim construction from the “Wave 1” cases. See Case No. 13-cv-01776-

PSG: Docket No. 158. The parties do not waive their right to appeal those constructions by 

agreeing to have them apply in these “Wave 2” cases.

2

 415 F.3d 1303, 1312-15 (Fed. Cir. 2005). 

Case 3:15-cv-00166-LB Document 222 Filed 05/14/15 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:15-cv-00166-LB Document 222 Filed 05/14/15 Page 4 of 4