Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03877/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03877-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

- 1 -

Stbu18024\ stip-extend2.doc Case No. C05-3877 RS

Further Stipulation to Extend Time to

Respond to Complaint; Continue CMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dennis Howell, Esq. SBN 78806

Rebecca Connolly, Esq. SBN 145482

GRUNSKY, EBEY, FARRAR & HOWELL

A Professional Corporation

240 Westgate Drive

Watsonville, CA 95076

Telephone: (831)722-2444

Facsimile: (831)722-6153

dennis.howell@grunskylaw.com

rebecca.connolly@grunskylaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant Starbucks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT

SAN JOSE

ESTATE OF ZIAM BOJCIC, AJNIJA

BOJCIC, NURKO BADETA, NURKO

MITHAT, NURKO ANZDA, NURKO

AMELA, TUCAKOVIC LARIFA,

TUCAKOVIC SMAZL, BELMA

PREJLOBAC SEJAD.

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF SAN JOSE, SAN JOSE POLICE

DEPARTMENT, OFFICER DONALD

GUESS, individually and in his official

capacity, STARBUCKS, MANAGER

STARBUCKS, individually and in her official

capacity.

Defendants.

The undersigned parties hereby stipulate that all served defendants shall have until March 29,

2006 to answer or otherwise respond to the above-captioned complaint. Plaintiffs’ counsel has

represented that prior to such date, but in no event later than March 15, 2006, he or substituted counsel

will be filing an Amended Complaint. If no amended complaint is filed by March 15, 2006,

defendants plan on filing their responsive pleading on or before March 29, 2006. Based on this

Case No: C05-3877 RS

FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

[proposed] ORDER

*E-FILED 3/7/06*

Case 5:05-cv-03877-RS Document 13 Filed 03/07/06 Page 1 of 3
- 2 -

Stbu18024\ stip-extend2.doc Case No. C05-3877 RS

Further Stipulation to Extend Time to

Respond to Complaint; Continue CMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

stipulated continuance with respect to the responsive pleading, the Case Management Conference

currently scheduled for March 29, 2006 is premature and the parties stipulate to continue the Case

Management Conference to June 28, 2006. All parties will indicate whether they consent to proceed

before the Magistrate Judge as currently scheduled on March 8, 2006.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

DATED: 3/7/06

By /s/

Kevin R. McLean, Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED: 3/7/06

By /s/

Clifford Greenberg, Attorneys for Defendants

City Of San Jose, San Jose Police Department,

And Officer Guess

DATED: 3/7/06 GRUNSKY, EBEY, FARRAR & HOWELL

By /s/

Rebecca Connolly, Attorneys for Defendant

Starbucks

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Case Management

Conference currently scheduled for March 29, 2006 is continued to June 28, 2006 at 2:30 p.m. The

defendants shall have until March 29, 2006 to file their responsive pleading.

DATED: ____________________ _______________________________________

Richard Seeborg

United States Magistrate Judge

3/7/06

Case 5:05-cv-03877-RS Document 13 Filed 03/07/06 Page 2 of 3
- 3 -

Stbu18024\ stip-extend2.doc Case No. C05-3877 RS

Further Stipulation to Extend Time to

Respond to Complaint; Continue CMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

General Rule 45 Attestation

I, Rebecca Connolly, hereby declare that I have the concurrence of the above-named

signatories to file this document electronically.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is

true and correct.

Executed this 7

th

day of March 2006, at Watsonville, California.

/s/

Rebecca Connolly

Case 5:05-cv-03877-RS Document 13 Filed 03/07/06 Page 3 of 3