Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05107/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05107-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIRAN PANDE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CHEVRONTEXACO CORP., ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

Case No. C-04-05107 JCS

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S BILL OF

COSTS

Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses. 

In that motion, Plaintiff states that she seeks in addition to the attorneys’ fees and expenses that are

briefed in the motion any amounts that might be denied by the Clerk’s Office in taxing costs. The

Court declines to consider that request because it does not comply with Civil Local Rule 54-5, which

sets forth the procedural requirements for filing a motion for review of the Clerk’s taxation of costs. 

Under that rule, Plaintiff is required to file a motion for review of the Clerk’s taxation of costs

within five days of the notice of taxation of costs. The Clerk’s Office taxed costs in this case on

March 12, 2008. Should Plaintiff wish to challenge the determination of the Clerk’s Office, she

must file a timely motion under Civ.L.R. 54-5.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2008

 

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-05107-JCS Document 227 Filed 03/19/08 Page 1 of 1