Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01673/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01673-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50871/2278098.1 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING 

CASE NO. C 05-1673 RMW

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

 OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

 John B. Quinn (Bar No. 90378) 

 David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758) 

 Dominic Surprenant (Bar No. 165861) 

 Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649) 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Email: johnquinn@quinnemanuel.com 

 davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com 

 dominicsurprenant@quinnemanuel.com 

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Tele Atlas N.V. and Tele Atlas North America 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

 Andrew P. Bridges (Bar No. 122761) 

101 California Street, 39th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 591-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 

Email: abridges@winston.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NAVTEQ Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

TELE ATLAS N.V. and TELE ATLAS 

NORTH AMERICA, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NAVTEQ CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

 CASE NO. C 05-1673 RMW 

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER REGARDING SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT BRIEFING 

Complaint filed April 22, 2005 

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

*E-FILED - 11/2/07*

Case 5:05-cv-01673-RS Document 126 Filed 11/02/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50871/2278098.1 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING 

CASE NO. C 05-1673 RMW

1 

STIPULATION

Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to the following. 

 WHEREAS, NAVTEQ Corporation (“NAVTEQ”) filed its “Motion for Partial 

Summary Judgment” with respect to NAVTEQ’s alleged tying conduct on September 15, 2007; 

 WHEREAS, the brief filed in support of that motion was 25 pages; 

WHEREAS, NAVTEQ filed its “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on All 

Claims Other Than Tying” on October 5, 2007; 

WHEREAS, the brief filed in support of that motion was 30 pages; 

WHEREAS, the hearing on NAVTEQ’s motions for summary judgment has been 

set for November 30, 2007; and 

WHEREAS, the parties have reached agreement regarding scheduling and page 

limits with respect to the opposition and reply briefs to be filed in connection with NAVTEQ’s 

motions for summary judgment; 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Tele Atlas N.V., Tele Atlas 

North America, and NAVTEQ Corporation, through their respective counsel of record, as follows: 

1. Tele Atlas shall file one brief of not more than 55 pages in opposition to 

NAVTEQ’s motions for summary judgment; 

2. Tele Atlas shall file its opposition brief on November 5, 2007; and 

3. NAVTEQ shall file any reply brief(s) totaling not more than 30 pages on 

November 16, 2007. 

DATED: October 29, 2007 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

 By /s/ Melissa J. Baily 

 Melissa J. Baily 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Tele Atlas N.V. and Tele Atlas North America 

Case 5:05-cv-01673-RS Document 126 Filed 11/02/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50871/2278098.1 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING 

CASE NO. C 05-1673 RMW

2 

DATED: October 29, 2007 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

 By /s/ David Koropp 

 David Koropp 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NAVTEQ Corporation 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: ______________________ __________________________________ 

 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

 United States District Court Judge 

11/2/07

Case 5:05-cv-01673-RS Document 126 Filed 11/02/07 Page 3 of 3