Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06658/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06658-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 However, on August 31, 2007, plaintiff instead filed a declaration [93], disregarding the motion(s) as he is 1

now in receipt of his legal materials in order to finish discovery.

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD ADAMS, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

P. VASQUEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06658-LJO-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 92)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION/

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AS

MOOT (Doc. 91)

Plaintiff, Ronald Adams (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 30, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed on or before September 29,

2007. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.1

Case 1:04-cv-06658-LJO-DLB Document 96 Filed 12/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 30,

2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a court order requiring prison

officials provide him with his legal materials, filed August 15,

2007, is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 30, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06658-LJO-DLB Document 96 Filed 12/03/07 Page 2 of 2