Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00345/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00345-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 540
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip to Ext Time

C 06-0345 MHP

KEVIN V. RYAN, CSBN 118321

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143

Assistant United States Attorney

Chief, Civil Division

ILA C. DEISS, NY SBN 3052909

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7124

FAX: (415) 436-7169

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WEI DING, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of the )

Department of Homeland Security; EMILIO T. )

GONZALEZ, Director, U.S. Citizenship and )

Immigration Services; DAVID STILL, San )

Francisco District Director, U.S. Citizenship and )

Immigration Services; EVELYN UPCHURCH, )

Acting Director, Nebraska Service Center, )

)

Defendants. )

 )

No. C 06-0345 MHP

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

WITHIN WHICH THE DEFENDANTS

MUST FILE AN ANSWER; and

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their attorneys

of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a forty-five day extension of

time within which the Defendants must serve its answer in the above-entitled action. The

extension is required to allow sufficient time for USCIS to complete its adjudication of Plaintiff’s

Form I-485 Petition, and to determine whether this matter can be resolved without further

litigation.

On March 7, 2006, I spoke with Plaintiff’s attorney by telephone, and he stated that he does not

object to a 45-day extension for Defendants’ answer. 

Case 3:06-cv-00345-MHP Document 5 Filed 03/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip to Ext Time

C 06-0345 MHP

Defendants respectfully request that the Court extend the due date for the answer until May 8,

2006.

Dated: March 6, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

 /s/ 

ILA C. DEISS

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Defendants

Dated: March 6, 2006 /s/ 

JUSTIN X. WANG

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

MARILYN HALL PATEL

United States District Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

March 8, 2006

Case 3:06-cv-00345-MHP Document 5 Filed 03/08/06 Page 2 of 2