Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05038/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05038-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

Case No.13-cv-05038-NC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE 

CORPORATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR 

COMPANY, LTD.,

Defendant.

Case No.13-cv-05038-NC 

ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL

BRIEFING

The Court has reviewed the parties’ pretrial submissions and objections and 

ORDERS the parties to submit additional briefing to address the following questions:

1. To both parties: do the parties agree that inducement can occur outside the United 

States? If the parties disagree, please provide supporting authority.

2. To Enplas: what is Enplas’ basis for asking for an invalidity finding on claims 38-

39, 41-43, 45-48 of the ‘554 patent, when the Court has already granted summary 

judgment of non-infringement on those claims?

3. To SSC: what types of damages are being sought in this case and under which legal 

theories are those damages sought?

The parties must submit no more than 5 pages of briefing by February 23, 2016, at 

12:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 19, 2016 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-05038-NC Document 368 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 1