Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01257/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01257-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

L.A. TAXI COOPERATIVE, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-01257-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s order, ECF No. 47, and the parties’ stipulation, ECF No. 48, the 

Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and 

Civil Local Rule 16-10:

1

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings October 16, 2015

Updated joint case management statement due November 25, 2015

Further case management conference December 9, 2015

Mediation deadline October 14, 2016

Fact discovery cut-off August 10, 2016

Expert disclosures August 12, 2016

Expert rebuttal September 23, 2016

 

1

This scheduling order contains only the Court’s usual events and omits certain other deadlines 

contained in the parties’ proposed scheduling order. ECF No. 48. The Court assumes the parties 

will honor their agreements with each other. 

Case 3:15-cv-01257-JST Document 49 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Expert discovery cut-off October 14, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions October 21, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due January 6, 2017

Pretrial conference January 13, 2017 at 

2:00 p.m.

Trial2 February 6, 2017 at 

8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) See below

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

The parties are ordered to state the expected length of trial in any future joint case 

management statement. 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

 

2

The Court has selected trial and pre-trial conference dates that that allow for more time between 

the hearing of summary judgment motions and trial, consistent with the Court’s usual practice. If 

the parties are not available on the indicated pre-trial and trial dates, they should notify the Court 

immediately. 

Case 3:15-cv-01257-JST Document 49 Filed 07/31/15 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The case management conference currently scheduled for August 5, 2015 is vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 31, 2015

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01257-JST Document 49 Filed 07/31/15 Page 3 of 3