Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-87-01108/USCOURTS-ca10-87-01108-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

/ 

.,. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

F I _L ED 

Unit.eel St.at.ea O>urt of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

REV. MCMAHON; REV. WILLIAM SCHLICHER; ) 

REV. GRANTOM; REV. MARK RAPONE, and all) 

likes situated, ) 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

JOHN C. CARLIN; MICHAEL BARBARA; 

RICHARD MILLS; GARY RAYL; 

HERBERT MASCHNER; DALE BOHANNON; 

RANDAL BUFORD, JR.; DAN DOYLE; 

CHAPLAIN JOHANSON, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT 

FEB 2 .( 1988 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No . 87-1108 

(D.C. No. 83-3340) 

(D. Kan.) 

Before MOORE and TACHA, Circuit Judges, and BRIMMER, Chief Judge.* 

*Honorable Clarence A. 

District Court for 

designation. 

Brimmer, Chief Judge, United States 

the District of Wyoming, sitting by 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.8. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The cause is therefore ordered 

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order of the district 

court entered on July 7, 1987, which granted a directed verdict in 

Appellate Case: 87-1108 Document: 010110027775 Date Filed: 02/24/1988 Page: 1 
favor of defendants on plaintiffs' claim for damages. At the time 

the notice of appeal was filed, plaintiffs' claim for injunctive 

relief was still pending. A certification pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), necessary for an immediate review of the 

interlocutory order, was neither sought nor granted in the 

district court. 

The order appealed from did not adjudicate the rights and 

liabilities of all the parties or all the claims. Accordingly, 

the appeal is premature and must be dismissed. See Golden Villa 

Spa, Inc. v. Health Indus., Inc., 549 F.2d 1363 (10th Cir. 1977). 

The appeal is DISMISSED. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 87-1108 Document: 010110027775 Date Filed: 02/24/1988 Page: 2