Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05270/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05270-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CRYSTAL LEE FURNESS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

GWENDOLYN MITCHELL, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:03-cv-05270-LJO-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 57)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On February 22, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation that the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus

be DISMISSED for petitioner's failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. §

2244(d) one-year limitation period. These Findings and

Recommendation were served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the

date of service of that order. 

On March 24, 2006, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings

and Recommendations. 

Case 1:03-cv-05270-LJO -DLB Document 60 Filed 09/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation are supported by

the record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no

grounds for questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed February 22, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DISMISSED for petitioner's failure to comply with 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d) one-year limitation period; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 25, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05270-LJO -DLB Document 60 Filed 09/25/07 Page 2 of 2