Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01190/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01190-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -1- 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time To Respond to Complaint 1071841v1 35107/0006

ZACHARY SMITH, ESQ. (SBN 07824) 

STEPHEN M. LERNER, ESQ. (SBN 176645) 

MICHAEL S. WILCOX, ESQ. (SBN 215269) 

McDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN PC 

Attorneys at Law 

555 Capitol Mall, 9th Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Phone: 916.444.3900 

Fax: 916.444.3249 

Attorneys for Defendant Premier West Bank 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(Sacramento Division) 

DENNIS W. BALL, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MIKE JOHANNS, in his official capacity as 

Secretary of the United States Department of 

Agriculture; UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a 

department of the United States; DOES ONE 

THROUGH TEN, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CIV S-07-01190-LKK/DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT OF 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

AGRICULTURE 

DENNIS W. BALL, an individual, INDIAN 

SPRINGS VINEYARDS, a California 

partnership, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

PREMIERWEST BANK, a banking 

corporation; DOES ONE THROUGH THIRTY, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and Defendant 

PREMIER WEST BANK (hereafter “Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby 

stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, as follows: 

Case 2:07-cv-01190-LKK -DAD Document 56 Filed 02/05/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -2- 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time To Respond to Complaint 1071841v1 35107/0006

The Court has recently denied in part and granted in part with leave to amend, Defendant's 

motion to dismiss brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), Defendant's response to the original complaint is due within ten (10) 

days of the date of the Court's Order. Plaintiff has stated its intent to amend Plaintiff's Third-Party 

Complaint and the Court has granted fifteen (15) days for such amendment. The parties hereby 

agree to extend Defendants' time to respond to the original Third-Party Complaint so that the 

response will be due five (5) days after the due date of Plaintiff's amendment. This extension will 

prevent Defendant from filing a response to the original complaint that will be rendered unnecessary 

by the Plaintiff's amendment. Upon Plaintiff's filing of the amended complaint, Defendant shall 

have the time to respond stated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the 

Court. 

The parties have previously stipulated to an extension of thirty (30) days for Defendant's 

response. The prior extension was necessary to give counsel for Defendant additional time to 

complete the review of the administrative record in order to prepare its motion to dismiss. 

SO STIPULATED 

DATED: January 31, 2008 McGREGOR W. SCOTT 

United States Attorney 

By: /s/ Ana Maria Martel 

ANA MARIA MARTEL 

Assistant Untied States Attorney 

Attorneys for Mike Johanns in his capacity as 

Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture 

DATED: January 31, 2008 McDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN PC 

 Attorneys at Law 

By: /s/ Michael S. Wilcox 

MICHAEL S. WILCOX 

Attorneys for Defendant Premier West Bank 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 4, 2008. 

Case 2:07-cv-01190-LKK -DAD Document 56 Filed 02/05/08 Page 2 of 2