Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01083/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01083-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

SARAH RYAN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

333 Market Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8978

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: sarah.ryan@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

BARBARA ZACHARY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of )

Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

CIVIL NO. 1:07-CV-1083 AWI DLB

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF

VOLUNTARY REMAND AND DISMISSAL

OF CASE, WITH DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the

approval of the Court as provided below, that the Commissioner has agreed to a voluntary remand of this

case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. 

The parties have agreed that upon remand to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), Plaintiff will

be offered the opportunity for a new hearing and decision at which she may update the record and

present new evidence as desired. The ALJ should update the record by obtaining updated treating

Case 1:07-cv-01083-AWI-DLB Document 25 Filed 05/29/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 - Stip & Order of Sentence Four Remand

records and either an updated consultative mental examination and/or medical expert evidence regarding

the extent of Plaintiff’s limitations in view of the existing consultative examinations and the updated

treatment record, as warranted. The reports of Drs. Cushman and Morgan should be reconsidered and

proper reasons provided if they are not accepted. Supplemental vocational expert evidence should be

obtained, as warranted.

It is further stipulated that the administrative decision is hereby vacated and that the Clerk of this

Court shall be directed to enter a separate judgment herein, as provided for under Rules 58 and 79(a) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, pursuant to Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 113 S. Ct. 2625

(1993).

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: May 8, 2008 /s/ Sengthiene Bosavanh 

(As authorized via facsimile)

SENGTHIENE BOSAVANH

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: May 8, 2008 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

/s/Sarah Ryan 

SARAH RYAN

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

This stipulation is APPROVED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 29, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01083-AWI-DLB Document 25 Filed 05/29/08 Page 2 of 2