Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01061/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01061-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

LEGAL_US_W # 59503793.1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

GLENN D. DASSOFF (SB# 96809) glenndassoff@paulhastings.com

SCOTT H. SIMS (SB# 234148) scottsims@paulhastings.com

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

695 Town Center Drive 

Seventeenth Floor 

Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1924 

Telephone: (714) 668-6200 

Facsimile: (714) 979-1921 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

LA BOXING FRANCHISE CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LA BOXING FRANCHISE 

CORPORATION, a California corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

PRIME TIME BOXING FRANCHISE, INC., 

a California corporation; PRIME TIME 

BOXING, INC., a California corporation; and 

DOES 1 through 200, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:08-CV-01061-JAM-EFB 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT 

STIPULATION FOR: 

(A) FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME 

FOR LA BOXING FRANCHISE 

CORPORATION TO REPLY TO 

DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIMS; 

AND 

(B) FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME 

FOR THE PARTIES TO COMPLETE 

THE RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE AND 

REPORT 

PRIME TIME BOXING FRANCHISE, INC., 

a California corporation; PRIME TIME 

BOXING, INC., a California corporation; and 

DOES 1 through 200, 

Counterclaimants, 

vs. 

LA BOXING FRANCHISE 

CORPORATION, a California corporation, 

Counterdefendant. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:08-cv-01061-JAM-EFB Document 14 Filed 07/21/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

-2- 

LEGAL_US_W 

# 59503793.1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation for (A) Further Extension 

of Time for LA Boxing Franchise Corporation to Reply to Defendants’ 

Coutnerlciams; and (B) Further Extension of Time for the Parties to Complete the 

Rule 26(f) Conference and Report, filed by plaintiff/counterdefendant LA Boxing 

Franchise Corporation (“Plaintiff”) and defendants/counterclaimants Prime Time 

Boxing, Inc. and Prime Time Boxing Franchise, Inc. (“Defendants”), and for good 

cause shown, hereby ORDERS: 

i. Plaintiff shall reply to Defendants’ counterclaims on or before 

on or before September 16, 2008; and 

ii. The Parties shall comply with the Court’s Order Requiring Joint 

Status Report on or before September 16, 2008. 

Based on the foregoing, is so ORDERED: 

DATED: July 21, 2008 

 /s/ John A. Mendez_____________ 

 Hon. John A. Mendez 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:08-cv-01061-JAM-EFB Document 14 Filed 07/21/08 Page 2 of 2