Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01902/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01902-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

QUIA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MATTEL, INC. and FISHER-PRICE, INC.,

Defendants. /

No. C10-01902 JF (HRL)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART JOINT REQUEST

FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME

[Re: Docket No. 13]

The parties jointly request an expedited (telephonic) hearing as to a discovery dispute

that has arisen in connection with plaintiff’s anticipated motion for temporary restraining order

and preliminary injunction. The discovery matter having been referred to the undersigned for

disposition, the parties’ request for an order shortening time is GRANTED IN PART AND

DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. Defendants’ motion for expedited limited discovery shall be filed no later than

4:00 p.m. on May 21, 2010. Defendants’ brief shall not exceed 7 pages. Additionally,

defendants shall provide the specific discovery requests that they seek to propound. Under

these circumstances, this court expects that whatever limited discovery defendants seek will be

narrowly tailored and focused to target the information defendants claim they need.

2. Plaintiff’s opposition is due by noon on May 24, 2010. Plaintiff’s brief shall not

exceed 7 pages.

*E-FILED 05-20-2010*

Case 5:10-cv-01902-JF Document 14 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. To the extent defendants wish to file a reply, their reply brief (not to exceed 3

pages) shall be filed no later than noon on May 25, 2010.

4. The parties’ request for a telephonic hearing is DENIED. The parties shall

appear in person for oral argument on May 27, 2010, 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2.

SO ORDERED.

Dated:

 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

May 20, 2010

Case 5:10-cv-01902-JF Document 14 Filed 05/20/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:10-cv-01902-JF Notice has been electronically mailed to:

J. Michael Keyes mike.keyes@klgates.com, rosemary.wood@klgates.com

Kathryn Mary Wheble kwheble@klng.com

Robert Nathan Phillips phillipsr@howrey.com, kalaheled@howrey.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not

registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Case 5:10-cv-01902-JF Document 14 Filed 05/20/10 Page 3 of 3