Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05387/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05387-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MAYER BROWN LLP

IAN FEINBERG (SBN 88324)

ERIC B. EVANS (SBN 232476)

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300

3000 El Camino Real

Palo Alto, CA 94306

Telephone: (650) 331-2000

Facsimile: (650) 331-4555

ifeinberg@mayerbrown.com

Attorneys for Defendant, Counterclaimant, and

Third-Party Plaintiff

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AG,

a German Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,

a Delaware Corporation,

Defendant,

Civil Action No. C 06-5387 RMW (RS)

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,

a Delaware Corporation,

Counterclaimant,

v.

HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AG,

a German Corporation,

Counterdefendant,

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,

a Delaware Corporation,

Third-party Plaintiff,

v.

LINOTYPE GmbH,

a German Corporation,

Third-party Defendant.

*E-FILED 9/25/07*

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 1 of 16
-2-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for plaintiff

HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AG (“HDM”), defendant, counterclaimant and third

party plaintiff ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED (“Adobe”) and third party defendant

LINOTYPE GmbH (“Linotype”) (HDM, Adobe and Linotype will sometimes be collectively

referred to as “the Parties”) that:

A. This case concerns royalties allegedly due and owing on agreements between

Linotype and Adobe. HDM and Linotype assert that Linotype assigned its claims for royalties

accrued through March 31, 2006 to HDM. Adobe, HDM and Linotype believe that documents

and things that are being requested in discovery might reveal highly sensitive and confidential

information that is purposely protected from disclosure to the public and that, if disclosed, would

damage HDM, Adobe and/or Linotype.

B. A substantial volume of materials is being sought, and is expected to be sought, in

discovery in this action from the Parties and third parties that includes confidential and sensitive

commercial information. The Parties believe that this confidential information includes, but is

not limited to, sensitive financial information, including sales information, profit figures and

calculations, pricing, royalties and other accounting information, and sensitive technical

information including product builds and the like.

C. Therefore, good cause exists for the entry of this Protective Order pursuant to

Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to protect against improper disclosure or use

of confidential information produced or disclosed in this case.

D. The party about whose business or technology information or documents are

produced as described in paragraphs 1 and 2 could suffer serious competitive harm if the

information identified above or other competitively sensitive information were made available to

its customers, competitors, or to the public.

E. The Producing Party’s interest in restricting the disclosure and use of the

confidential information described above far outweighs the interest of the public in having access

to such information.

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 2 of 16
-3-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

F. THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate to

the following protective order and respectfully request this Court to enter this stipulation as an

order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. SCOPE

This Stipulated Protective Order (“Protective Order”) shall govern material and

information produced in this action, including, without limitation: all deposition testimony and

deposition exhibits; all testimony taken at hearings or other proceedings; and all transcripts of

any such testimony; all documents, physical objects, recordings and things produced in the

course of discovery; and responses to discovery requests, whether produced informally or in

response to interrogatories, requests for admission, or requests for production of documents, or

any other method of discovery. This Protective Order also shall govern material and information

produced in this action pursuant to mandatory disclosure provisions and supplementary

disclosure requirements of any Federal Rule or Local Rule of this Court.

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1. Party or Parties: a party named in this action and represented by the undersigned

counsel in this action, including all of their parents, subsidiaries, and affiliates, officers,

directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff).

2.2. Non-Party: a third party not named in this action but that discloses material and

information for use in this action, either informally or pursuant to discovery mechanisms

provided by any Federal Rule or Local Rule of this Court.

2.3. Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items, regardless of the medium or manner

generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, documents, testimony,

transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to

discovery in this action.

2.4. “CONFIDENTIAL” and “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY”

Information or Items: information (regardless of how generated, stored or maintained) or

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 3 of 16
-4-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

tangible things that qualify for protection, such as trade secrets or other confidential research,

development, or commercial information, information that if publicly disclosed may cause a

Party, Non-Party, or any other person annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden

or expense, and other information that qualifies for protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(7).

2.5. Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery

Material in this action.

2.6. Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a

Producing Party.

2.7 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY”.

2.8. Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that

it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or

“CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY”.

2.9. Challenging Party: a Party that challenges or disputes the validity of a

Designating Party’s designation of certain material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or

“CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY”.

2.10. Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are

retained to represent or advise a Party in this action or in any other action between the Parties.

2.11. In-House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party.

2.12. Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel.

2.13. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent

to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as

a consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or of a

competitor of a Party and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee

of a Party or a competitor of a Party. This definition does not include a professional jury or trial

consultant retained in connection with this litigation.

2.14. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 4 of 16
-5-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; organizing,

storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and subcontractors.

3. DURATION

The confidentiality obligations imposed by this Protective Order shall remain in effect

during this litigation and after its termination, until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in

writing or a court order otherwise directs.

4. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

4.1. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party

or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Protective Order must

take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate

standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of

material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify, so that other portions

of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are

not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Protective Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or

routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified, or

that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case

development process, or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other Parties), expose

the Designating Party to sanctions.

4.2. Material Likely to Be Designated.

(i) Documents identifying customers;

(ii) financial information, including information regarding sales;

(iii) pricing;

(iv) royalties;

(v) technical information including product builds and the like;

(vi) internal strategy and marketing materials.

4.3. Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this

Protective Order (see, e.g., Paragraph 4.5, below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 5 of 16
-6-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

that qualifies for protection under this Protective Order must be clearly designated as such before

the material is disclosed or produced. Designation conforms with this Protective Order in the

following ways:

(a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions or other

pretrial or trial proceedings), the Producing Party must affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or

“CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY” at the top or bottom of each page that

contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for

protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by

making appropriate markings in the margins).

A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection

need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which

material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all

of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL- OUTSIDE

COUNSEL ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and

produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for

protection under this Protective Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the

Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL –

OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY” at the top or bottom of each page that contains Protected

Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the

Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

markings in the margins).

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the

Party or Non-Party offering or sponsoring the testimony identifies on the record, before the close

of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further specifies any

portions of the testimony that qualify as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE

COUNSEL ONLY”. When it is impractical, before the end of the deposition, to identify

separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection, and/or when it appears that

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 6 of 16
-7-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Party or Non-Party that

sponsors, offers, or gives the testimony may invoke on the record (before the deposition or

proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to 20 days from receipt of the transcript to identify

the specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought. Only those portions of the

testimony that are designated for protection within the 20 days after receipt of the transcript shall

be covered by the provisions of this Protective Order.

Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by the court

reporter, who must affix to the top or bottom of each such page the legend “CONFIDENTIAL”

or “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY” as instructed by the Party or Non-Party

offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony.

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for any other

tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the

container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL”

or “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY.” If only portions of the information or

item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the

protected portions.

4.4. Removal of Designation. If it comes to a Party’s or a Non-Party’s attention that

information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not

qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify

all other Parties that it is withdrawing or modifying the mistaken designation.

4.5. Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to

designate qualified information or items as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL –

OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to

secure protection under this Protective Order for such material. If material is appropriately

designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY” after

the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the

designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material thereafter is treated in

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 7 of 16
-8-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order.

4.6. Non-Applicability of Designation. The restrictions of this Protective Order shall

not apply to any information which in the future is made known to the Receiving Party on a

nonconfidential basis by the Producing Party, or which is made known in the future to the

Receiving Party on any basis by any source other than the Producing Party, which source is

independent of the Receiving Party. Nor do the restrictions of this Protective Order apply to any

information which the Receiving Party shall establish was already known to it at the time of

disclosure, or has been or becomes a matter of public knowledge through no act of the Receiving

Party, or has been publicly available through no act of the Receiving Party.

5. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

5.1. Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s

confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary

economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not

waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge

promptly after the original designation is disclosed.

5.2. Manner of Challenge. A Party that elects to challenge a Designating Party’s

confidentiality designation may do so by providing written notice (by email and U.S. mail) to

lead counsel for the Designating Party identifying the challenged designation with specificity. If

within ten (10) business days of receipt of the challenge, the Designating Party does not affirm

its designation by written notice (by email and U.S. mail) to lead counsel for the Challenging

Party, the challenged designation shall be deemed withdrawn and the designated material so

designated shall no longer be deemed to be confidential. If within ten (10) business days of

receipt of the challenge, the Designating Party affirms its designation by written notice to lead

counsel for the Challenging Party, the Meet and Confer process (described in Paragraph 5.3

below) shall commence.

5.3. Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to affirm its confidentiality designation must

do so in good faith and meet and confer within five (5) business days of its affirmation by

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 8 of 16
-9-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

conferring directly (in voice-to-voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient)

with counsel for the Challenging Party. In conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the

basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the

Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the

circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen

designation. If the Challenging Party still disputes the validity of the designation after the meet

and confer has taken place, the Designating Party may maintain its confidentiality designation

for the challenged designation only if it moves for a protective order or other judicial

intervention (as described in paragraph 5.4 below) within forty five (45) days of the meet and

confer.

5.4. Judicial Intervention. A Party that seeks to maintain its confidentiality

designation after failing to obtain the Challenging Party’s consent during the meet and confer

may file and serve a motion under Civil L.R. 3-7 (and in compliance with Civil L.R. 79-5, if

applicable) that identifies the designated material and sets forth in detail the basis for the

designation. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms

that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding

paragraph and that sets forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation

that was given by the Designating Party in the meet and confer dialogue.

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating

Party. Until the Court rules on the challenge, all Parties shall continue to afford the material in

question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation.

6. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

6.1. Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed

or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this action only for

prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this action or any related litigation between the

Parties. Such Protected Material may be used for any purpose related to this action or related

litigation between the Parties including, without limitation, the service of subpoenas or other

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 9 of 16
-10-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

legal process on witnesses and non-parties and the amendment of the complaint (if permitted by

stipulation and/or the Court) to add additional claims and/or additional parties to this action.

Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the

conditions described in this Protective Order. When all litigation between or among the Parties

has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of Paragraph 10, below

(FINAL DISPOSITION).

6.2. Care and Custody of Protected Material. Protected Material must be stored and

maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is

limited to the persons authorized under this Protective Order.

6.3. Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise

ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may

disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel as well as employees of said Counsel to whom

it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information;

(b) up to five (5) officers, directors, or employees (including In-House Counsel) of the

Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the

“Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(c) experts (as defined in this Protective Order) of the Receiving Party to whom

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the

“Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(d) the Court and its personnel;

(e) court reporters, their staffs, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is

reasonably necessary for this litigation;

(f) professional jury and trial consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for

this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound”

(Exhibit A);

(g) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 10 of 16
-11-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit

A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected

Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone

except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and

(h) the author of the document or the original source of the information and recipients of

e-mails, letters, and other written correspondence.

6.4. Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY” Information

or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating

Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL –

OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY” only to:

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel as well as employees of said Counsel to whom

it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information;

(b) one inside counsel for the Receiving party who is not involved in “competitive

decisionmaking” under the test enunciated in Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d

1465, 1470 (9th Cir. 1992), as applied in, e.g., Amgen, Inc. v. Elanex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 160

F.R.D. 134, 139 (W.D. Wash. 1994). The Receiving party shall designate inside counsel under

this paragraph to other parties before providing “CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL

ONLY” materials to that inside counsel. Other parties will have seven (7) days to object to such

designation. If the parties cannot agree after meeting and conferring on which inside counsel the

Receiving party may have review “CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY”

materials, the party with an objection may request that the court order that the designated inside

counsel not have access to “CONFIDENTIAL — OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY” materials;

(c) experts (as defined in this Protective Order) of the Receiving Party to whom

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the

“Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(d) the Court and its personnel;

(e) court reporters, their staffs, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 11 of 16
-12-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

reasonably necessary for this litigation;

(f) professional jury and trial consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for

this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound”

(Exhibit A);

(g) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably

necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit

A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected

Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone

except as permitted under this Protective Order; and

(h) the author of the document or the original source of the information and recipients of

e-mails, letters, and other written correspondence.

6.5. No Concession of Admissibility. Notwithstanding the provisions in this

Protective Order that permit the disclosure of documents and information to Outside Counsel in

this action and in related litigation between the Parties, nothing in this Protective Order shall be

interpreted as a Party’s waiver of its right to object to the admissibility of such documents or

information in this action or in related litigation between the Parties.

7. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED

IN OTHER LITIGATION

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that

would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY”, the Receiving

Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by email and U.S. mail) immediately and

in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification

must include a copy of the subpoena or court order.

The Receiving Party must also immediately inform in writing the Party who caused the

subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the

subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 12 of 16
-13-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

deliver a copy of this Protective Order promptly to the Party in the other action that caused the

subpoena or order to issue. The Receiving Party will cooperate with any efforts the Designating

Party decides to undertake to seek a protective order or other relief in response to a third-party

subpoena or other order affecting Protected Material.

The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested Parties to the existence of

this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party an opportunity to try to protect its

confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The Designating

Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking protection in that court of its

confidential material, and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or

encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

8. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective

Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the

unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material,

(c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of

this Protective Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment

and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A).

9. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL

Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order secured after

appropriate notice to the Designating Party, a Party may not file any Protected Material in the

public record in this action or in any related litigation between the Parties. A Party that seeks to

file under seal any Protected Material in this action must comply with Civil L.R. 79-5.

10. FINAL DISPOSITION

Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within sixty (60)

days after the final termination of litigation between or among the Parties, each Receiving Party

must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 13 of 16
-14-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of

reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. With permission in writing from the

Designating Party, the Receiving Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead

of returning it. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party

must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity,

to the Designating Party) by the sixty (60) day deadline that identifies (by category, where

appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that the

Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms

of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision,

Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal

memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if such materials contain Protected

Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject

to this Protective Order as set forth in Paragraph 3 (DURATION), above.

11. MISCELLANEOUS

11.1. Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Protective Order abridges the right of any

person to seek its modification by the Court in the future.

11.2. Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective

Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any

information or item on any ground not addressed in this Protective Order. Similarly, no Party

waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by

this Protective Order.

11.3 This Stipulation shall become binding immediately upon its execution without

regard to whether or when it becomes an order of the Court.

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 14 of 16
-15-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED TO BY:

August 14, 2007 MAYER BROWN LLP

Ian N. Feinberg

Eric B. Evans

By:U /s/ U

Ian N. Feinberg

Attorneys for Defendant

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED

August 10, 2007 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER &

HAMPTON LLP

Steven B. Sacks

M. Elizabeth McDaniel

David DeGroot

By:U /s/ U

David DeGroot

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AG

August 10, 2007 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Patrick S. Thompson

By:U /s/ U

Patrick S. Thompson

Attorneys for Defendant

LINOTYPE GmbH

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), Ian Feinberg hereby

attests that the signatories’ concurrences in the filing of this document have been obtained.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

September 25, 2007

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 15 of 16
-16-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C06 5387 RMW (RSx)

44036813.2

44036813.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AG,

a German Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,

a Delaware Corporation,

Defendant,

Civil Action No. C 06-5387 RMW (RSx)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND

AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY

PROTECTIVE ORDER

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,

a Delaware Corporation,

Counterclaimant,

v.

HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AG,

a German Corporation,

Counterdefendant,

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,

a Delaware Corporation,

Third-party Plaintiff,

v.

LINOTYPE GmbH,

a German Corporation,

Third-party Defendant.

I hereby acknowledge that I have reviewed a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order,

dated _______ __, 2007, and that I will comply with the terms of said Stipulated Protective

Order in all respects.

Dated: ______________________ ___________________________

Case 5:06-cv-05387-RMW Document 24 Filed 09/25/07 Page 16 of 16