Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01759/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01759-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SALVADOR DAVID GEROLAGA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

D. ADAMS, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-CV-01759 SMS HC

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE

TRAVERSE 

[Doc. #22]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Magistrate

Judge for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c).

On April 30, 2007, Petitioner filed a motion to supplement his traverse. It appears Petitioner

is under the mistaken belief that this Court will re-sentence him. In support of his motion to

supplement, Petitioner has attached numerous laudatory letters and certificates of achievement.

However, these documents are not relevant to the petition pending before the Court since they have

no bearing on the claims raised. In addition, even if the petition were to be granted, the Court would

not re-sentence Petitioner but remand the case to the state courts. 

Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion to supplement the traverse is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 8, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01759-JMD Document 23 Filed 06/08/07 Page 1 of 1