Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03809/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03809-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 

COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CB EQUITIES, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-03809-DMR 

ORDER TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 40

On February 25, 2016, Plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company filed a Motion for 

Default Judgment [Docket No. 40.] Having reviewed Plaintiff’s motion, this court determines that 

Plaintiff did not brief its entitlement to the entry of default judgment pursuant to the factors 

enumerated in the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 

1986). Plaintiff’s motion fails to provide any relevant legal authority or analysis to establish its 

case. The motion also does not clearly specify the relief sought. 

Deutsche Bank’s present motion is substantively identical to its prior Motion for Default 

Judgment filed on September 28, 2015 [Docket No. 11], does not comply with the Hon. Kandis A. 

Westmore’s prior order in this case [Docket No. 15], nor does it addressed any of the substantive 

issues identified in the undersigned’s prior order [Docket No. 24] requiring Plaintiff to supplement 

its briefing in support of its prior Motion for Default Judgment. 

Plaintiff is hereby ordered to supplement its briefing in support of its Motion for Default 

Judgment [Docket No. 40] to address these deficiencies. 

Additionally, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 32] references a number of 

exhibits, none of which were filed with the First Amended Complaint. 

Plaintiff shall file its supplemental briefing in support of its Motion for Default Judgment 

[Docket No. 40] and the exhibits referenced in its First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 32] by 

Case 4:15-cv-03809-JSW Document 56 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

April 13, 2016. Any opposition or statement of non-opposition is due no later than April 18, 

2016. 

Please be advised that the previously-noticed hearing date on the motion of April 14, 2016

at 11:00 a.m. has been vacated. You are hereby notified that the hearing on the motion is set for 

April 28, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. at the U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 

94612. For courtroom number and floor information, please check the Court’s on-line calendar at 

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov (click “Calendars - Judges' Weekly Calendars” link, then select 

Judge Ryu’s calendar) or call Judge Ryu’s Courtroom Deputy, Ivy Garcia, at (510) 637-3639, one 

week prior to the scheduled hearing. 

Immediately upon receipt of this Order, Plaintiff shall serve Defendants with a copy 

of this Order and file a proof of service with the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 7, 2016

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:15-cv-03809-JSW Document 56 Filed 04/07/16 Page 2 of 2