Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01391/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01391-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL G. VALENCIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WINFRED KOKOR,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:13-cv-01391-LJO-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

(Document 43)

Plaintiff Daniel G. Valencia (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in 

this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on August 30, 2013. He 

filed a supplemental complaint on May 24, 2014. On October 28, 2014, Defendant filed a motion to 

dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 11, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 

Defendant’s motion be granted and that Plaintiff’s complaint and supplemental complaint be 

dismissed with leave to amend. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and 

contained notice that any objections must be filed within thirty days. The parties have not filed

objections.

///

///

Case 1:13-cv-01391-LJO-MJS Document 47 Filed 04/20/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed March 11, 2015, are adopted in full; 

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Document 26) is GRANTED; and

3. Plaintiff’s complaint and supplemental complaint are DISMISSED WITH LEAVE 

TO AMEND. Plaintiff SHALL file a single, complete amended complaint within 

thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order. The amended complaint SHALL 

be subject to screening and Defendant need not file a response until ordered to do so.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01391-LJO-MJS Document 47 Filed 04/20/15 Page 2 of 2