Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-00628/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-00628-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. Re Mod. Prot. Order - 1 - Frye v. Warden, CIV S-99-0628 LKK-KJM

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, SB #89424

Acting Federal Defender

TIM SCHARDL, FL Bar #0073016

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 498-6666

Attorney for Petitioner

JERRY GRANT FRYE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY GRANT FRYE,

Petitioner,

v.

WARDEN, California State Prison at San

Quentin,

Respondent.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CIV S-99-0628 LKK KJM

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER & STIPULATION TO

MODIFICATION OF

PROTECTIVE ORDER

On April 19, 2004, this Court entered a protective order (Doc. 156) limiting the use and

dissemination of information produced to Petitioner pursuant to the discovery order (Doc. 151) filed

March 22, 2004. On April 27, 2005, the United States District Court for the District of Northern

California entered a similar protective order in Ashmus v. Brown, C 93 594 TEH (Doc. 332). 

The present form of the protective orders in Frye and Ashmus have the effect of

preventing information produced to the petitioner in one case from being made available to counsel or

used in the other case. This restriction results in diseconomies burdensome to all parties in both cases

because the petitioner in Frye has been granted the right to request production of some of the same

probation reports that have been produced to the petitioner in Ashmus or that may be so produced in the

future. 

Case 2:99-cv-00628-KJM-CKD Document 210 Filed 05/01/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. Re Mod. Prot. Order - 2 - Frye v. Warden, CIV S-99-0628 LKK-KJM

In order to avoid duplication of efforts, the parties agree and hereby stipulate to the

modification of the protective orders in Frye and Ashmus so that probation reports that have been or will

be produced to the petitioner in Ashmus and the information they contain may be used in the study and

litigation contemplated by the discovery order in Frye and vice versa. The parties agree that they will be

bound by the Ashmus order and no further third-party notification is necessary as to those documents

produced and/or exchanged pursuant to this Stipulation.

In order to ensure the continuing confidentiality of information covered by the protective

orders, the petitioners’ counsel shall prepare a numeric key as specified on page 2, lines 19 through 27 of

the Ashmus protective order, and paragraph 6 of the Frye protective order. The parties agree and hereby

stipulate that a single numeric key will be prepared for identifying all the cases referenced in the public

file of either case, and that the single numeric key will be common to both cases.

The parties in this case understand that an identical stipulation is being filed in Ashmus.

Dated: April 10, 2006.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Acting Federal Defender

 /s/ Tim Schardl 

TIM SCHARDL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Petitioner

JERRY GRANT FRYE

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

 /s/Wanda Hill Rouzan (as authorized on 3/22/06)

WANDA HILL ROUZAN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Respondent

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MARK H. HARRIS State Bar #133578

Law Offices of Mark H. Harris

2207 J Street

Sacramento, California 95816

916-442-6155

916-442-5921 (fax)

 /s/ Mark H. Harris (signature inserted 3/22/06) 

MARK H. HARRIS

Attorney for California Department of Corrections

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:99-cv-00628-KJM-CKD Document 210 Filed 05/01/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. Re Mod. Prot. Order - 3 - Frye v. Warden, CIV S-99-0628 LKK-KJM

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 28, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:99-cv-00628-KJM-CKD Document 210 Filed 05/01/06 Page 3 of 3