Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-14-03295/USCOURTS-ca8-14-03295-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3295

___________________________

Michael A. Hoelscher; Theresa Hoelscher; C. M. Hoelscher, by Next Friend,

Theresa Hoelscher, a Minor

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

Miller's First Insurance Co.; Miller’s Classified Insurance Co.; George S. Milnor,

President and CEO, Individually and Corporate Capacity; John M. Huff, Division

Director, Consumer Affairs, State of Missouri Department of Insurance, Financial

Institution and Professional Registration, Consumer Affairs Division; Matt Barton,

Director, Consumer Affairs, State of Missouri Department of Insurance, Financial

Institution and Professional Registration, Consumer Affairs Division; Carol A.

Harden, Consumer Service Coordinator, State of Missouri Department of

Insurance, Financial Institution and Professional Registration, Consumer Affairs

Division; Mike Haymart; G & C Adjusting Services LLC; Wayne Bernskoetter;

Wayne Bernskoetter Constructions; Victor R. Sapp; Sapp Home Pro, Inc.; Jude

Markway; Jude Markway Construction; Jeff Sapp

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City

____________

 

 Submitted: March 23, 2015

Filed: March 31, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Appellate Case: 14-3295 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2015 Entry ID: 4260074 
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Hoelscher, Theresa Hoelscher, and C. M. Hoelscher, by Next Friend,

Theresa Hoelscher (the Hoelschers) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their civil

1

complaint. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that the Hoelschers’ claims

were time-barred, and that dismissal was therefore proper. See Fullington v. Pfizer,

Inc., 720 F.3d 739, 744, 747 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review; appellate court may

affirm dismissal on any basis supported by record); cf. Gross v. United States, 676

F.2d 295, 300 (8th Cir. 1982) (statute of limitationsfor continuing tort generally runs

from date of last tortious act). We further conclude that the district court did not

abuse its discretion in denying the Hoelschers post-judgment relief. See Miller v.

Baker Implement Co., 439 F.3d 407, 414 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri.

-2-

Appellate Case: 14-3295 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2015 Entry ID: 4260074