Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02560/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02560-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 The court has separately recommended dismissal of this action due to plaintiff’s failure 1

to exhaust administrative remedies prior to suit.

 Plaintiff also reargues objections to this court’s March 10, 2006 order. Those

2

objections have been considered and resolved by the district court. See Order filed August 31,

2006. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HARRY J. WILLIBY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2560 DFL JFM P

vs.

JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 2, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion styled as a motion for

entry of final judgment. The motion is predicated on screening orders issued by this court and

the district court finding cognizable claims for relief in plaintiff’s amended complaint. The fact

that a pleading contains one or more cognizable claims for relief does not, without more, entitle

the pleader to judgment on the merits. To date there have been no proceedings on the merits of

plaintiff’s claims. For that reason, plaintiff’s motion will be denied. 1 2

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02560-JAM -JFM Document 32 Filed 02/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s October

2, 2006 motion for entry of final judgment is denied. 

DATED: February 26, 2007.

12

will2560.o

Case 2:04-cv-02560-JAM -JFM Document 32 Filed 02/27/07 Page 2 of 2