Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01486/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01486-62/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7487722.1 1. 

Case No. C 02-1486 CW 

[Proposed] Order in Support of Plaintiff’s 

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

HOWARD HOLDERNESS, State Bar No. 169814 

TERA M. HEINTZ, State Bar No. 241414 

COURTNEY CRUZ, State Bar No. 240276 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

Attorneys for Third-Party Respondent 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

IN RE JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION 

SECURITIES LITIGATION, 

Master File No. C 02-1486 CW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO LEAD 

PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

DOCUMENTS DESIGNATED AS 

CONFIDENTIAL 

Date: January 23, 2007 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Dept.: Courtroom of the 

Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte 

Third party respondent Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) joins Lead Plaintiff’s 

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Designated as Confidential. In connection 

with plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Deposition Testimony and to Require Cisco Systems, 

Inc. to Search for Documents Responsive to Plaintiff’s Prior Discovery Requests, plaintiff cited to 

documents and deposition testimony designated as “Confidential” by Cisco, under the Court’s 

Order Regarding Confidentiality, filed September 21, 2005. Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(d), 

plaintiff lodged with the Court both redacted and un-redacted versions of the Notice of Motion 

and Motion to Compel Further Deposition Testimony and to Require Cisco Systems, Inc. to 

Search for Documents Responsive to Plaintiff’s Prior Discovery Requests; Supporting 

Memorandum of Points and Authorities; and both redacted and un-redacted versions of the 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 898 Filed 02/05/07 Page 1 of 2
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-SF/7487722.1 2. 

Case No. C 02-1486 CW 

[Proposed] Order in Support of Plaintiff’s 

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal 

Declaration of Mark I. Labaton in support of the Motion to Compel Further Deposition 

Testimony and to Require Cisco Systems, Inc. to Search for Documents Responsive to Plaintiff’s 

Prior Discovery Requests. 

The Court having duly considered the submissions and arguments of counsel hereby 

orders that: 

1) The un-redacted version of the Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Further 

Deposition Testimony and to Require Cisco Systems, Inc. to Search for Documents Responsive to 

Plaintiff’s Prior Discovery Requests and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities 

lodged with the Court by plaintiff shall be filed under seal; 

2) The redacted version of the Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Further 

Deposition Testimony and to Require Cisco Systems, Inc. to Search for Documents Responsive to 

Plaintiff’s Prior Discovery Requests and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities 

lodged with the Court by plaintiff shall be filed in the public record; 

3) The un-redacted versions of the Declaration of Mark I. Labaton in support of the 

Motion to Compel Further Deposition Testimony and to Require Cisco Systems, Inc. to Search for 

Documents Responsive to Plaintiff’s Prior Discovery Requests lodged with the Court by plaintiff 

shall be filed under seal; 

4) The redacted versions of the Declaration of Mark I. Labaton in support of the 

Motion to Compel Further Deposition Testimony and to Require Cisco Systems, Inc. to Search for 

Documents Responsive to Plaintiff’s Prior Discovery Requests lodged with the Court by plaintiff 

shall be filed in the public record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: ___________________________ ________________________________ 

 Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 898 Filed 02/05/07 Page 2 of 2