Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01830/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01830-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-PA/3624595.1 STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-2(a) 

(No. C 04-1830 CRB (JL)) 

FRANKLIN BROCKWAY GOWDY, SBN 47918 

THOMAS D. KOHLER, SBN 207917 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

DAVID C. BOHRER, SBN 212397 

MICHAEL J. LYONS, SBN 202284 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

2 Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2212 

Tel: 650.843.4000 

Fax: 650.843.4001 

mlyons@morganlewis.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD. 

DANIEL M. PRESS 

JUAN CHARDIET (pro hac vice) 

CHUNG & PRESS , P.C. 

6723 Whittier Ave., Ste. 302 

McLean, VA 22101 

Telephone: 703.734.3800 

Facsimile: 703.734.0590 

dpress@chung-press.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

DAEWOO ELECTRONICS , et al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

Funai Electric Company, Ltd., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Daewoo Electronics Corporation, et. al. 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 04-1830 CRB (JL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2(a) 

TO CONFIRM EXPERT DISCOVERY 

DATES RELATING TO SUCCESSOR AND 

JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY 

CLAIMS 

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 330 Filed 01/31/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-2(a) 

(No.C 04-1830 CRB (JL)

WHEREAS plaintiff, with leave of Court, added successor and joint and several liability 

claims on August 15, 2005; 

WHEREAS the Court entered an Order dated December 12, 2005 [D.I. 219] stating that 

“[t]he Court will not consider plaintiff’s recently added successor and joint and several liability 

claims until after the patent infringement claims are resolved.” 

WHEREAS, the Court also has entered Scheduling Orders on July 15, 2006 [215] and 

November 19, 2006 [310] pursuant to which written expert reports are due on February 9, 2007, 

rebuttal reports on April 9, 2007 and expert discovery cut-off on April 20, 2007. 

WHEREAS, plaintiff has approached defendants Daewoo Electronics Corporation 

(“DEC”) and Daewoo Electronics America, Inc. (“DEAM”) (the non-defaulting defendants who 

remain in the case) for purposes of clarifying plaintiff’s understanding that expert reports and 

discovery relating to successor and joint and several liability claims will be addressed after the 

patent infringement claims are resolved. Moreover, plaintiff’s factual discovery on successor and 

joint and several liability claims is ongoing, and plaintiff is attempting to resolve without the 

Court’s involvement plaintiff’s concerns that defendants have not fully complied with this 

discovery (defendants dispute this contention) such that plaintiff to-date has not had a reasonable 

opportunity to determine whether and to what extent to submit expert testimony on this issue. 

Finally, depending upon the outcome of the patent infringement claims, it may not be necessary 

for the parties to incur the time and expense of developing expert reports and conducting expert 

discovery on these issues. 

WHEREAS, the parties do not propose to extend or otherwise modify current fact 

discovery deadlines or trial dates. For example, plaintiff intends to complete factual discovery on 

successor and joint and several liability claims by the current discovery cut-off of March 30, 

2007. 

THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), for the convenience of the Court and the 

parties, the parties hereby stipulate to and request the Court adopt the following: 

Expert disclosure and expert discovery relating to successor and 

joint and several liability will be coordinated with the Court 

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 330 Filed 01/31/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-2(a) 

(No.C 04-1830 CRB (JL)

following trial on patent infringement issues, but in any event these 

activities will be scheduled to occur a reasonable time prior to the 

Court receiving evidence and oral and written arguments on 

successor and joint and several liability claims. 

This stipulation does not otherwise affect the Court’s prior scheduling orders. 

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 24, 2007. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

By: /s/ David C. Bohrer 

David C. Bohrer 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD. 

Dated: January 24, 2007. CHUNG & PRESS, P.C. 

By: /s/ Daniel M. Press 

Daniel M. Press 

Attorneys for Defendants 

DAEWOO ELECTRONICS 

CORPORATION et al. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________________ ______________________________________ 

 CHARLES R. BREYER 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

January 30, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 330 Filed 01/31/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-2(a) 

(No.C 04-1830 CRB (JL)

 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I, David C. Bohrer, 

attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 

signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that 

the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 24th day of January, 2007, at Palo Alto. 

 /s/David C. Bohrer 

 David C. Bohrer 

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 330 Filed 01/31/07 Page 4 of 4