Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01965/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01965-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAURICE WOODSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. WEISMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:08-cv-1965 MCE CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On March 16, 2015, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 

60.) Plaintiff has been granted three extensions of time to file an opposition or a statement of 

non-opposition to the pending motion. (ECF Nos. 62, 65, 67.) On July 31, 2015, plaintiff was 

informed that failure to file a response to the motion within thirty days would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 67.) The thirty day period has now 

expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 

dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

Case 2:08-cv-01965-MCE-CKD Document 68 Filed 09/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: September 9, 2015

2 / wood1965.46fr

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:08-cv-01965-MCE-CKD Document 68 Filed 09/09/15 Page 2 of 2