Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-06532/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-06532-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN L. MURPHY,

Plaintiff,

v.

STEVEN CAMBRA,

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO. 1:01-cv-06532-OWW-LJO PC

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION REQUESTING THE COURT

DELAY RULING ON HIS MOTION TO

AMEND PENDING RESOLUTION OF

PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

(Doc. 105)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

RE-SERVE DOCUMENT 98 ON PLAINTIFF 

Plaintiff Kevin L. Murphy (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (Americans with Disabilities Act), and 29

U. S. C. § 794 (Rehabilitation Act). On November 21, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion requesting that

the court delay ruling on his motion to amend pending resolution of the parties’ motions for

summary judgment. (Doc. 105.)

Plaintiff’s motion to amend, filed June 2, 2006, was denied by the court in an order issued

on September 1, 2006. (Doc. 98.) Plaintiff’s motion to delay a ruling is therefore moot. In light of

the fact that plaintiff believes his motion is still pending, it appears that plaintiff did not receive the

court’s order. Accordingly, the Clerk’s Office shall be directed to re-serve the order. 

///

///

///

Case 1:01-cv-06532-OWW -LJO Document 114 Filed 01/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion requesting the

court delay ruling on his motion to amend pending resolution of the parties’ motions for summary

judgment, filed November 21, 2006, is DENIED AS MOOT, and the Clerk’s Office SHALL re-serve

document 98 on plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:01-cv-06532-OWW -LJO Document 114 Filed 01/30/07 Page 2 of 2