Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171-42/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

OKI AMERICA, INC., ET AL., 

 PLAINTIFF, 

VS. 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 DEFENDANT. 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS

UNDER SEAL 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 COUNTERCLAIMANT, 

VS. 

OKI AMERICA, INC., OKI ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRY CO., LTD., OKI DATA 

CORPORATION AND OKI DATA AMERICAS,

INC., 

 COUNTER-DEFENDANTS. 

WHEREAS, counsel for Oki and AMD have designated the documents and exhibits 

listed in Attachment A as Outside Counsel Only under the Protective Order entered by this 

Court on December 8, 2004; and 

WHEREAS, due to citation or paraphrasing of the content of these documents, 

portions of the following motions have been designated by Oki and AMD as Outside 

Counsel Only under the Protective Order entered by this Court on December 8, 2004: 

(1) AMD’s Notice of Motion and Partial Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement of the Kurachi Patents by its K8 Microprocessors and Motion to Deny 

Injunctive Relief Against its Obsolete K7 Processors That Were Fabricated in its Fab 25 

Facility and Brief in Support; 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 429 Filed 09/20/06 Page 1 of 9
-2- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(2) AMD’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of 

Literal Infringement of the Patel Patent; 

(3) AMD’s Notice of Motion and Partial Motion for Summary Judgment of 

Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 6,495,855; 

(4) AMD’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Exclude the Testimony of 

Richard B. Troxel With Respect to AMD’s Damages Claim; and 

(5) AMD’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Exclude the Testimony of 

Richard B. Fair. 

WHEREAS, AMD now seeks to file with the Court the documents listed in 

Attachment A in connection with the above-referenced motions. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between all parties that the 

documents listed in Attachment A and the above-referenced motions should be filed under 

seal because they contain confidential information protected under the Court’s Protective 

Order entered December 8, 2004. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: September 14, 2006 VINSON & ELKINS, LLP 

/s/ Christopher V. Ryan 

 Christopher V. Ryan 

Attorneys for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD & 

EVANS, PLLC 

/s/ Patrick Curran 

 Patrick Curran 

Attorneys for Oki America, et al. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 429 Filed 09/20/06 Page 2 of 9
-3- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated:__________________________ _______________________________________ 

 Charles R. Breyer 

 United States District Judge 

September 20, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 429 Filed 09/20/06 Page 3 of 9
-4- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in Travis County Texas, I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the 

within action; my business address is 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 78746. 

On September 14, 2006, I served the foregoing document(s) described as 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

on the interested parties in this action, at the following addresses: 

Daniel J. Bergeson 

Melinda M. Morton 

BERGESON, LLP 

303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500 

San Jose, CA 95110-2712 

Mark C. Hansen 

J.C. Rozendaal 

Patrick Curran 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD &

EVANS, PLLC 

Sumner Square 

1615 M. Street, NW, Suite 400 

Washington, DC 20036 

( ) (For Collection). By placing a true copy (copies) thereof enclosed in a sealed 

envelope(s), addressed as above, and by placing said sealed envelope(s) for collection and 

mailing on that date following ordinary business practices. I am “readily familiar” with the 

business’ practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing the U.S. 

Postal Service. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on 

that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Austin, Texas, in the ordinary course of 

business. 

( ) (Overnight Delivery). By placing a true copy(ies) thereof enclosed in a sealed 

envelope(s) or package(s) as designated by Federal Express, addressed as above, and 

depositing said envelope(s) or package(s), with delivery fees provided for, in a box 

regularly maintained by Federal Express at 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 

78746. 

(X) (Electronic Filing). In accordance with Section IX(B) of General Order No. 45 for 

cases designated in this Court for electronic case filing. 

(X) (Courtesy copy via email). By transmitting a true unredacted copy(ies) thereof to 

each of the designated counsel on the service list to the following email addresses: 

jrozendaal@khhte.com and dbergeson@be-law.com. 

( ) (Personal Delivery). I caused to be served by messenger for personal delivery that 

same day the foregoing documents in a sealed envelope to the above persons at the 

address(es) listed above. 

(X) I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on September 14, 2006 at Austin, Texas. 

/s/ 

Dawn Crider 

742989v1 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 429 Filed 09/20/06 Page 4 of 9
-5- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTACHMENT A

AMD’s Notice of Motion and Partial Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement of the Kurachi Patents by its K8 Microprocessors and Motion to Deny 

Injunctive Relief Against its Obsolete K7 Processors That Were Fabricated in its 

Fab 25 Facility and Brief in Support: 

1. Exhibit D -- Expert Report of Dr. Richard B. Fair Re Infringement of U.S. 

Patent 5,739,571 (Kurachi); U.S. Patent 5,856,694 (Kurachi); and U.S. 6,495,855 

(Sawamura), which contains AMD’s confidential information regarding products and 

processes. 

2. Exhibit E -- Declaration of Stephen Beebe Regarding AMD’s Output Buffer 

ESD Protection Devices, which contains confidential information pertaining to AMD’s 

protection circuits. 

3. Exhibit G -- letters dated May 4 and September 8, 2006 from Chris Ryan to 

J.C. Rozendaal, and letter from J.C. Rozendaal to Chris Ryan dated September 12, 2006, 

which contains confidential information pertaining to AMD’s manufacturing of K7 

microprocessors. 

4. Exhibit O -- Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Dean P. Neikirk Regarding NonInfringement of Kurachi and Sawamura Patents, which contains confidential information 

pertaining to AMD’s products and processes. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 429 Filed 09/20/06 Page 5 of 9
-6- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMD’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Literal 

Infringement of the Patel Patent: 

1. Exhibit D – deposition of Oki Electric Industry Co., Limited, Through its 

Designee Hiroshi Katsuyama, Vol. 2, July 20, 2005, which contains Oki’s confidential 

information regarding Oki’s products and processes. 

2. Exhibit E – selected pages from the Expert Report of Dr. Dean P. Neikirk 

Regarding Infringement of Dixit, Patel, and Allen Patents, which contains Oki’s 

confidential information regarding Oki’s products and processes. 

3. Exhibit G – Oki Deposition Exhibit Nos. 14-22 (dated July 20, 2005), which 

contains Oki’s confidential information regarding Oki’s products and processes. 

4. Exhibit H – Rebuttal Expert Report of Dhaval Brahmbhatt Regarding 

Noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,737,830 (without exhibits), which contains Oki’s 

confidential information regarding Oki’s products and processes. 

5. Exhibit I – selected pages from the Deposition of Dean P. Neikirk, August 22, 

2006, which contains Oki’s confidential information regarding Oki’s products and 

processes. 

6. Exhibit J – deposition of Dhaval Brahmbhatt, August 29, 2006, which 

contains Oki’s confidential information regarding Oki’s products and processes. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 429 Filed 09/20/06 Page 6 of 9
-7- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMD’s Notice of Motion and Partial Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of 

the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 6,495,855: 

1. Exhibit F -- July 21, 2006 Expert Report of Dr. Dean P. Neikirk Regarding 

Invalidity of Kurachi and Sawamura Patents, ¶¶ 87-101, and 108-109, which contains 

Intel’s confidential process and product information. 

2. Exhibit G -- July 20, 2006 Expert Report of Dr. Richard Fair Regarding 

Infringement of U.S. Patent 5,739,571 (Kurachi); U.S. Patent 5,856,694 (Kurachi); and 

U.S. Patent 6,495,855 (Sawamura), ¶¶ 168-234, which contains confidential information 

pertaining to AMD’s products and processes. 

3. Exhibit H -- June 28, 2006 Deposition of Carlos Salazar, which contains 

Intel’s confidential process and product information. 

4. Exhibit I -- certain Intel Sales Records, Bates Labeled 851 INTEL000001 and 

Exhibit 6 to the June 28, 2006 Deposition of Carlos Salazar, which contains Intel’s 

confidential information pertaining to sales. 

5. Exhibit M -- June 28, 2006 Deposition of Lawrence Brigham, which contains 

Intel’s confidential process and product information. 

6. Exhibit N -- Invalidity Claim Chart for the ‘855 Patent in light of the Intel 

233 MHz with MMX Processor, which contains Intel’s confidential process and product 

information. 

7. Exhibit O -- certain Intel Process Documents, Bates Labeled 850 

AMD000011-23 and Exhibit 1 to the June 28, 2006 Deposition of Lawrence Brigham, 

which contains Intel’s confidential process and product information. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 429 Filed 09/20/06 Page 7 of 9
-8- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMD’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Richard B. Troxel 

With Respect to AMD’s Damages Claim: 

1. Exhibit 1 -- Rebuttal Expert Report on Damages – Richard B. Troxel, dated 

August 14, 2006, which contains AMD’s and Oki’s confidential information pertaining to 

products, processes and sales. 

2. Exhibit 2 -- transcript of Oral Videotaped Deposition of Richard B. Troxel, 

dated September 6, 2006, which contains AMD’s and Oki’s confidential information 

pertaining to products, processes and sales. 

3. Exhibit 3 -- Oki Cost Estimate – Troxel Deposition Exhibit 13, which 

contains AMD’s and Oki’s confidential information pertaining to products, processes and 

sales. 

4. Exhibit 4 -- Oki Cost Estimate – Troxel Deposition Exhibit 14, which 

contains AMD’s and Oki’s confidential information pertaining to products, processes and 

sales. 

5. Exhibit 5 -- Oki Cost Estimate – Troxel Deposition Exhibit 15, which 

contains AMD’s and Oki’s confidential information pertaining to products, processes and 

sales. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 429 Filed 09/20/06 Page 8 of 9
-9- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMD’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Richard B. Fair: 

1. Exhibit A -- Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Richard B. Fair Regarding NonInfringement of USP 4,518,678 dated August 13, 2006, which contains confidential 

information pertaining to Oki’s edge bead removal and importing and sales processes. 

2. Exhibit D -- Expert Report of Dr. Richard Fair Regarding Infringement of 

USP 5,739,571 (Kurachi); USP 5,856,694 (Kurachi); and USP 6,495,855 (Sawamura) dated 

July 21, 2006, which contains confidential information relating to AMD’s products and 

processes. 

742989v1 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 429 Filed 09/20/06 Page 9 of 9