Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01376/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01376-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 130
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40:270 Miller Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

174/022879-0058 

8500799.1 a06/02/15 

-1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS Case No. 15-01376 HSG

William T. Eliopoulos (State Bar No. 100633) 

weliopoulos@rutan.com 

Kaveh Badiei (State Bar No. 215179) 

kbadiei@rutan.com 

RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 

Five Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 200 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-9814 

Telephone: 650-320-1500 

Facsimile: 650-320-9905 

Attorneys for Plaintiff (Real Party In Interest) 

ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HATHAWAY DINWIDDIE 

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, FEDERAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1-50, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 4:15-cv-01376-HSG

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

District Judge: Hon. Kandis A. Westmore 

Action Filed: March 25, 2015 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached 

the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5; 

Court Processes: 

□ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

□ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R.5) 

Case 4:15-cv-01376-HSG Document 25 Filed 06/15/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

174/022879-0058 

8500799.1 a06/02/15 

-2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS Case No. 15-01376 HSG

X Mediation (ADR L.R.6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate 

in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of 

Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process: 

□ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) 

___________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________ 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

□ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

X other requested deadline 

 June 30, 2016. 

Dated: June 2, 2015 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 

By: /s/ William T. Eliopoulos 

William T. Eliopoulos 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Rosendin Electric, Inc. 

Dated: Signature authorized June 2, 2015_ MILLER MORTON CAILLAT & NEVIS, 

LLP 

By: /s/ Stephanie M. Rocha 

Stephanie M. Rocha 

Attorneys for Hathaway-Dinwiddie 

Construction Company, Travelers 

Casualty and Surety Co. of America, and 

Federal Insurance Company 

 

Case 4:15-cv-01376-HSG Document 25 Filed 06/15/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

174/022879-0058 

8500799.1 a06/02/15 

-3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS Case No. 15-01376 HSG

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

□ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

□ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:15-cv-01376-HSG Document 25 Filed 06/15/15 Page 3 of 3