Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01468/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01468-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This motion was determined to be suitable for decision *

without oral argument. L.R. 78-230(h).

It is unclear why the Status (Pretrial) Scheduling Order 1

allowed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint without seeking

leave; however, Defendant did not object to the Order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation, )

) 2:05-cv-1468-GEB-JFM

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER*

)

NIKEPAL INTERNATIONAL INC., a ) 

California corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

)

On December 9, 2005, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend its

Complaint. The Status (Pretrial) Scheduling Order filed September 24,

2005, states “Plaintiff has until December 9, 2005, to file and serve

an amended complaint.” (Order, Sept. 24, 2005, at 2.) Therefore, 1

Plaintiff has ten (10) days from the date this Order is filed to file

and serve an amended complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01468-GEB -JFM Document 45 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 2:05-cv-01468-GEB -JFM Document 45 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 2