Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01329/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01329-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

HOU\42782.1 1 

Daniel J. Herling (SBN 103711) 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

One Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 371-2200 

Facsimile: (415) 371-2201 

Richard T. Redano (pro hac vice) 

Gary R. Maze (pro hac vice)

3200 Southwest Freeway Suite 3150 

Houston, TX 77027 

Telephone: (713) 402-3900 

Facsimile: (713) 402-3901 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THOMSON, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TECHNOLOGY LICENSING )

CORPORATION, a Nevada Corporation, 

and 

AV TECHNOLOGIES LLC 

)

 Plaintiffs, )

)

Case No. CIV S-03-1329 WBS PAN 

vs. )

)

THOMSON, INC., a Delaware )

Corporation )

 Defendant. )

)

)

)

)

)

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE JOINT MOTION FOR 

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 

JURY DEMANDED 

Date: _______________________ 

Time: _______________________ 

Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb 

ORDER

The Court has fully considered the Joint Motion of Plaintiffs, Technology Licensing 

Corporation (“TLC”) and AV Technologies LLC (“AVT”), and Defendant, Thomson, Inc. 

(“Thomson”), to stay all of Thomson’s counterclaims, to the extent that such counterclaims still 

Case 2:03-cv-01329-WBS -EFB Document 193 Filed 08/01/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

HOU\42782.1 2 

exist in this case, relating to U.S. Patent Numbers 5,495,524 and 4,573,070 (the “Joint Motion”) 

as well as all pleadings and evidence submitted by the parties on the Joint Motion. 

In earlier proceedings, the Court heard motions by Thomson for summary judgments on 

Plaintiffs’ infringement and damages claims (Doc. ##100, 106, 113, 123 and 128). The Court 

granted summary judgment in Thomson’s favor on these motions on June 30, 2005 (Doc. #170) 

and July 22, 2005 (Doc. #183). 

The Court has found that there is no just reason to delay entry of judgment on the claims 

for which summary judgment has been granted. Therefore, the Joint Motion is GRANTED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

(a) pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b), the Court orders and directs the Clerk to enter a 

final judgment, on a separate document complying with FED. R. CIV. P. 58, as 

follows: 

On Plaintiffs’ Count in their Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement 

by Thomson, Inc. of U.S. Patent No. 5,495,524 and U.S. Patent No. 

4,573,070, judgment is entered in favor of Thomson, Inc., based upon the 

Court’s June 30, 2005 Order and the Court’s July 22, 2005 Order, and 

plaintiffs Technology Licensing Corporation and AV Technologies LLC 

shall take nothing on that count. 

(b) all proceedings between Plaintiffs, TLC and AVT, and Defendant, Thomson, with 

respect to Thomson’s counterclaims, to the extent that such counterclaims still 

exist in this case, relating to U.S. Patent Numbers 4,573,070 (the ‘070 Patent) and 

5,459,524 (the ‘524 Patent) are stayed in this proceeding, Case No. CIV S-03-

1329, until further Order from this Court. 

Case 2:03-cv-01329-WBS -EFB Document 193 Filed 08/01/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

HOU\42782.1 3 

This stay shall only apply to Thomson’s pending counterclaims, to the extent that such 

counterclaims still exist in this case. This stay shall not apply to any filing of any motions by 

Thomson for a finding of an exceptional case, attorneys’ fees, and/or for bill of costs and the 

filing of any request for further relief. Plaintiffs will retain the ability to file motions and/or 

oppositions concerning any motions initiated by Thomson pursuant to this Order. 

This stay does not include those portions of the case which were previously severed and 

stayed by the Court’s September 7, 2004 Order. 

This stay shall be effective until further Order of the Court upon motion from either party 

to lift this stay. 

All dates in the Court’s July 15, 2005 Final Pretrial Order are hereby vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: July 29, 2005 

Case 2:03-cv-01329-WBS -EFB Document 193 Filed 08/01/05 Page 3 of 3