Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00288/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00288-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CVIN, LLC dba VAST NETWORKS, 

CALAVERAS COMMUNICATIONS 

COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

AND RELATED COUNTER, CROSS, 

AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00288-LJO-EPG

FINAL JUDGMENT

Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill

In light of the Stipulation for Final Judgment by and between Plaintiff and CrossDefendant MP Nexlevel of California, Inc. (“MPC”) and Defendant and Cross-Claimant 

CVIN LLC (“CVIN”) (collectively, the “Parties”), and good cause having been shown, the 

Court hereby enters final judgment in this matter as follows:

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

(1) For the reasons set forth in the Court’s July 19, 2016 Memorandum Decision 

and Order re Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 383), MPC’s Causes of Action 1, 

2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, and 

42 are barred because MPC failed to maintain an adequate California contractor’s license 

for its work on relevant CVIN Project Segments pursuant to California Business and 

Case 1:14-cv-00288-LJO-EPG Document 433 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Professions Code section 7031, and judgment is entered against MPC and in favor of 

CVIN on these Causes of Action;

(2) All remaining Causes of Action between CVIN and MPC are dismissed with 

prejudice, pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal. This dismissal shall not 

preclude CVIN from asserting any defenses or arguments in response to MPC’s appeal;

(3) The Parties shall be responsible for their own attorneys’ fees and costs 

incurred to date, and no award of the same is made; and

(4) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 30, 2017 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00288-LJO-EPG Document 433 Filed 01/30/17 Page 2 of 2