Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02536/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02536-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

DRINKER BIDDLE &

REATH LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR KAPLAN TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02536-JCS 

CHERYL D. ORR (SBN 143196)

cheryl.orr@dbr.com 

VALERIE D. KAHN (SBN 286532) 

Valerie.Kahn@dbr.com

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 

Telephone: (415) 591-7500 

Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 

PHILIPPE A. LEBEL (SBN 274032) 

philippe.lebel@dbr.com 

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

1800 Century Park East 

Suite 1500 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-1517 

Telephone: (310) 203-4000 

Facsimile: (310) 229-1285 

Attorneys for Defendant 

KAPLAN, INC., erroneously sued as KAPLAN 

INTERNATIONAL NORTH AMERICA, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KAITLIN RIDLEY, on behalf of herself 

and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

KAPLAN INTERNATIONAL NORTH 

AMERICA, LLC, 

Defendant.

Case No. 3:16-cv-02536-JCS 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT KAPLAN, INC. TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case 4:16-cv-02536-JSW Document 18 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 3
DRINKER BIDDLE &

REATH LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR KAPLAN TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

- 2 - CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02536-JCS 

 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant Kaplan, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Kaplan”)1

and Plaintiff Kaitlin Ridley (“Plaintiff” or “Ridley”), by and through their respective counsel, 

hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Ridley served her Collective and Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) on 

June 1, 2016;

WHEREAS, Kaplan currently has until June 22, 2016 to answer or respond to Ridley’s 

Complaint; 

WHEREAS, Kaplan has requested and Ridley has consented to an additional two weeks 

for Kaplan’s answer or response to Ridley’s Complaint; 

WHEREAS, an additional two weeks for Kaplan’s answer or response to Ridley’s 

Complaint will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, 

through their respective counsel, that Kaplan shall answer or otherwise respond to Ridley’s 

Complaint by July 6, 2016. 

Dated: June 22, 2016 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

By: /s/ Cheryl D. Orr 

Cheryl D. Orr 

Valerie D. Kahn 

Phillippe A. Lebel 

Attorneys for Defendant 

KAPLAN, INC., erroneously sued as 

KAPLAN INTERNATIONAL NORTH 

AMERICA, LLC 

1

 Defendant contends that Kaplan, Inc. is the properly named party and that it was 

erroneously sued as Kaplan International North America, LLC. Plaintiff will amend the 

complaint to name a different party if appropriate. 

Case 4:16-cv-02536-JSW Document 18 Filed 06/24/16 Page 2 of 3
DRINKER BIDDLE &

REATH LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR KAPLAN TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

- 3 - CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02536-JCS 

Dated: June 22, 2016 LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, PC

By: /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan 

Shannon Liss-Riordan 

Thomas Fowler 

Matthew D. Carlson 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

KAITLIN RIDLEY 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any 

signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 

 /s/ Cheryl D. Orr 

85921082.3

Dated: June 24, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 4:16-cv-02536-JSW Document 18 Filed 06/24/16 Page 3 of 3