Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02323/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02323-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Eva E. Rios,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Rozlin Financial Group, Inc.,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 09-2323-PHX-DKD

ORDER

Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on November 4, 2009 (Doc. #1). A review of the file indicates

this was the only pleading filed by plaintiff. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) states:

(m) Time Limit for Service. If a defendant is not served within 120 days after

the complaint is filed, the court — on motion or on its own after notice to the

plaintiff — must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or

order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows

good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an

appropriate period. This subdivision (m) does not apply to service in a foreign

country under Rule 4(f) or 4(j)(1).

LRCiv 41.1, Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of

Arizona provides that "[c]ases which have had no proceedings for six (6) or more months may

be dismissed by the Court for want of prosecution."

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff shall have twenty (20) days from the

date of the filing of this Order to show good cause why this case should not be dismissed

pursuant to LRCiv 41.1, Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of

Case 2:09-cv-02323-DKD Document 7 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Arizona, for want of prosecution and Rule 4(m), F.R.Civ.P. If plaintiff fails to comply with this

Order, this action shall be dismissed.

DATED this 7th day of May, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02323-DKD Document 7 Filed 05/07/10 Page 2 of 2