Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01070/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01070-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TERESA L. STRICKER, Interim City Attorney (SBN 160601)

JOHN J. FRITSCH, Assistant City Attorney (SBN 172182)

City of Santa Rosa

100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Room 8

Santa Rosa, California 95404

Telephone: (707) 543-3040

Facsimile: (707) 543-3055

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPT.; BRETT SIWY,

an individual and officer of the SRPD; and MICHAEL PAETZOLD, an individual

and officer of the SRPD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK BURAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, a government

entity; SANTA ROSA POLICE

DEPARTMENT, a government entity;

BRETT SIWY, individually; MICHAEL

PAETZOLD, individually; and DOES 1

to 20, inclusive, 

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. C 15-1070 TEH

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE REASSIGNMENT TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE RYU FOR

FURTHER CONFERENCE;

CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL AND

RELATED DATES 

Trial Date: October 18, 2016

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Ctrm: 2, 17thFl.

450 Golden Gate Ave., S.F.

Judge: Hon. Thelton E. Henderson

TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff MARK BURAS (BURAS)

and Defendants CITY OF SANTA ROSA, a government entity; SANTA ROSA POLICE

DEPARTMENT, a government entity; BRETT SIWY; MICHAEL PAETZOLD

(collectively, CITY), through their respective counsel of record, as follows:

1. Counsel for defendants and plaintiff BURAS hereby request that the court

re-assign this matter for further Mandatory Settlement Conference before Magistrate

Judge Donna Ryu. 

2. To conserve and potentially avoid expenses related to expert discovery

1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Continuance of MSC, Case No. C 15-1070 TEH

Case 3:15-cv-01070-TEH Document 50 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and pre-trial preparation, and to foster settlement prospects, counsel for defendants and

plaintiff BURAS hereby request either that the trial date in this matter be continued to a

trial date commencing the second week of January 2017, or a date after that, or that the

Court set a further Case Management Conference date.

3. Upon assignment of a continued trial date, all pre-trial dates shall be

derived from the newly assigned trial date.

SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: August 12, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF ANDRIAN &

GALLENSON

/s/ signature authorized

By:_________________________________

Jane Gaskell

Attorney for Plaintiff

MARK BURAS

Dated: August 12, 2016 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY

/s/ John J. Fritsch

By: ________________________________

John J. Fritsch

Assistant City Attorney

Attorney for Defendants

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, Det. 

BRETT SIWY and Officer

MICHAEL PAETZOLD

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the present trial date of October 18, 2016 is

vacated, and a further Case Management Conference shall be held on _________ at

_____, and the parties shall submit an updated Joint Statement ten days prior to the

Conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________ _____________________________________

Hon. Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Senior Judge, U.S. District Court 

2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Continuance of MSC, Case No. C 15-1070 TEH

November 7, 2016 1:30 PM

The parties shall contact Judge Ryu's chambers immediately to schedule a further settlement 

conference. If the case does not settle, the Court will set a new trial date at the CMC. 8/17/2016

Case 3:15-cv-01070-TEH Document 50 Filed 08/17/16 Page 2 of 2