Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05144/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05144-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICARDO A. SISNEROS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-05144-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings June 26, 20151

Fact discovery cut-off February 26, 2016

Expert disclosures March 18, 2016

Expert rebuttal April 8, 2016

Expert discovery cut-off April 22, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions May 13, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due July 26, 2016

 

1 Because this deadline has already passed, any party seeking to amend its pleadings must show 

good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16. 

Case 3:14-cv-05144-JST Document 51 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Pretrial conference August 5, 2016 at 

2:00 p.m.

Trial August 29, 2016 at 

8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) Eight

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

The Case Management Conference scheduled for July 22, 2015 is vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 17, 2015

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-05144-JST Document 51 Filed 07/17/15 Page 2 of 2