Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-03683/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-03683-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DELORES SELTZER

Plaintiff(s),

v.

TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD

DEVELOPMENT,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C08-03683 BZ

ORDER REQUIRING AMENDED

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff has applied to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Having reviewed the application, I find that I cannot properly

evaluate it because it contains conflicting or incomplete

financial information. 

 In her application, plaintiff’s stated monthly expenses

exceed $3,000, though she may have made an error in listing

her clothing expenses. In addition, plaintiff contributes

$3,000 yearly in support of two children. However, she does

not have a monthly income, bank account, or any other assets. 

It is thus unclear how plaintiff covers her monthly expenses. 

Case 3:08-cv-03683-BZ Document 4 Filed 08/12/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

These conflicting and incomplete responses preclude me from

meaningfully evaluating plaintiff’s eligibility to proceed in

forma pauperis. 

 For these reasons, and for good cause appearing, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that by no later than Monday, September 8,

2008, plaintiff must either submit an amended application or

pay the ordinary filing fee and proceed accordingly. Failure

to take one of these actions by that date will result in

dismissal of this action without prejudice. Any amended

application should address the questions raised in this Order. 

Plaintiff is reminded that if she chooses to pay the filing

fee rather than amend her application, she is responsible for

serving her complaint and any amendments or attachments,

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.

Dated: August 12, 2007

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\SELTZER V TENDERLOIN\ORDER.DENY.IN.FORM.PAUP.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-03683-BZ Document 4 Filed 08/12/08 Page 2 of 2