Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-00292/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-00292-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

JOINT SCHEDULING STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Error! Unknown document property name.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514)

 shaun@setarehlaw.com

Thomas Segal (SBN 222791)

 thomas@setarehlaw.com

Farrah Grant (SBN 293898)

 farrah@setarehlaw.com

SETAREH LAW GROUP

315 S. Beverly Drive, Suite 315

Beverly Hills, California 90212

Telephone (310) 888-7771

Facsimile (310) 888-0109

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DEAN R. ROBBINS

Lisa M. Bertain (SBN 124646)

 lisa.bertain@kyl.com

Cassidy Wallace

 Cassidy.Wallace@kyl.com

KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN

A Professional Corporation

450 Pacific Avenue

San Francisco, California 94133

Telephone (415) 398-6000

Facsimile (415) 981-0136

Attorneys for Defendant

PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEAN A. ROBBINS, on behalf of himself, all 

others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, a Delaware 

corporation; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:18-cv-00292-RS

Assigned For All Purposes To The Honorable 

Richard Seeborg, Courtroom 3

JOINT SCHEDULING STIPULATION 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Action Filed: November 27, 2017

Action Removed: January 12, 2018

Case 3:18-cv-00292-RS Document 72 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 3
1

JOINT SCHEDULING STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiff DEAN ROBBINS (“Plaintiff”) and 

Defendant PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY(“Defendant”) (“collectively, the “Parties”), through their 

respective counsel of record, seeking modified class certification briefing schedule. 

WHEREAS, on November 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed this lawsuit in the San Francisco 

Superior Court alleging that Defendant had violated the California Labor Code; 

WHEREAS, on January 12, 2018, Defendant removed the action to this Court; 

WHEREAS, on January 1, 2019 the Court granted the Parties Joint Scheduling Stipulation 

and class certification briefing schedule; Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification due by 

September 19, 2019; Defendant’s Opposition to Motion for Class Certification due by October 31, 

2019; Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Motion for Class Certification due by 

November 14, 2019; and hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification on December 12, 

2019 at 1:30 p.m.;

WHEREAS, the parties were scheduled to mediate this case on September 4, 2019 with 

Mark Rudy. The parties were recently informed that due to Mark Rudy’s health the mediation was 

cancelled. The parties have re-scheduled the mediation with Tripper Ortman on October 3, 2019. 

WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the Parties agree that good cause exists to extend the 

deadline for Plaintiff to file his Motion for Class Certification. 

The Parties stipulate to the following class certification briefing schedule:

• Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification due by January 6, 2020;

• Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Class Certification due by February 28, 2020;

• Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Class Certification due by 

_March 20, 2020;

• Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification on April 23, 2020, at

1:30 p.m., or a date thereafter most convenient for the Court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 3:18-cv-00292-RS Document 72 Filed 07/11/19 Page 2 of 3
2

JOINT SCHEDULING STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: July 1, 2019 SETAREH LAW GROUP

 /s/ Shaun Setareh 

SHAUN SETAREH 

THOMAS SEGAL 

FARRAH GRANT

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DEAN A. ROBBINS

DATED: July 1, 2019 KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN

/s/ Lisa Bertain

LISA M. BERTAIN

CASSIDY WALLACE 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY 

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

obtained from the other signatories. 

/s/ Shaun Setareh__________________

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _________________ _____________________________

HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG

July 11, 2019

Case 3:18-cv-00292-RS Document 72 Filed 07/11/19 Page 3 of 3