Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02403/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02403-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REFERRING CASE TO BINDING 

ARBITRATION, STAYING COURT ACTION 

PENDING ARBITRATION, AND 

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING PURSUANT 

TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) 

CASE NO.: C06-02403 RS 

PALIB1_2866755_1.DOC 

MARINA C. TSATALIS, State Bar No. 178897 

KORAY J. BULUT, State Bar No. 23298 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ACTEL CORPORATION, BARBARA 

McARTHUR AND JASON FENG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT WILLIAMS, an individual 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ACTEL CORPORATION INC., a California 

Corporation; BARBARA MCARTHUR, an 

Individual and as Vice President of Human 

Resources of Actel Corporation, JASON FENG, 

an individual and as the managing supervisor of 

Plaintiff at Actel Corporation, and DOES 1 

through DOES 100 inclusive, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C06-02403 RMW

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO 

BINDING ARBITRATION, 

STAYING COURT ACTION 

PENDING ARBITRATION, AND 

EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO FILE 

RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 

RULE 6-1(a) 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Robert Williams. (“Plaintiff”) filed its Complaint against Actel 

Corporation, Barbara McArthur and Jason Feng (“Defendants”) (collectively the “Parties”) on 

February 14, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Defendants removed this action to United States District Court on April 6, 

2006; 

Case 5:06-cv-02403-RMW Document 11 Filed 05/18/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REFERRING CASE TO BINDING 

ARBITRATION, STAYING COURT ACTION 

PENDING ARBITRATION, AND 

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING PURSUANT 

TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) 

CASE NO.: C06-02403 RS

-2- PALIB1_2866755_1.DOC C:\DO

WHEREAS, Plaintiff agreed to extend the time for Defendants to file their responsive 

pleading to April 25, 2006, which agreement was set forth in a Stipulation and filed with this 

Court on April 21, 2006; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to an arbitration agreement set forth in the 2004 Actel Corporation 

Employee Guidelines, Plaintiff agreed to binding arbitration of the causes of action that he has 

alleged in this case; and 

WHEREAS, Defendants are providing Plaintiff with a complete copy of the 2004 Actel 

Corporation Employee Guidelines, at his request. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties HEREBY STIPULTAE as follows: 

1. Subject to Plaintiff’s review of the entire 2004 Actel Corporation Employee 

Guidelines, Plaintiff will comply with his agreement to arbitrate and submit the causes of action 

that he has alleged in this case to binding arbitration pursuant to his arbitration agreement. 

2. The court action shall be stayed pending the completion of the arbitration. 

3. Plaintiff shall inform Defendants by 5:00 p.m. on April 26, 2006 if he refuses to 

proceed to binding arbitration based on any provision of the 2004 Actel Corporation Employee 

Guidelines. 

4. If Plaintiff timely refuses to proceed to arbitration based on his review of the 2004 

Actel Corporation Employee Guidelines, the deadline for Defendants to file their first responsive 

pleading shall be extended to April 27, 2006. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 25, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By:/s/ Koray J. Bulut 

Koray J. Bulut 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ACTEL CORPORATION, BARBARA 

McARTHUR AND JASON FENG 

Case 5:06-cv-02403-RMW Document 11 Filed 05/18/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REFERRING CASE TO BINDING 

ARBITRATION, STAYING COURT ACTION 

PENDING ARBITRATION, AND 

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING PURSUANT 

TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) 

CASE NO.: C06-02403 RS

-3- PALIB1_2866755_1.DOC C:\DO

Dated: April 25, 2006 KALLIS LAW FIRM 

By: 

Jeffrey Kallis 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ROBERT WILLIAMS 

O R D E R 

IT IS SO ORDERED. The court action is hereby stayed until the binding arbitration has 

been had in accordance with the terms of the parties’ agreement. 

Dated: May___, 2006 _________________________ 

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte U.S. District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-02403-RMW Document 11 Filed 05/18/06 Page 3 of 3