Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00754/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00754-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAMONT SHEPARD,

Plaintiff,

v.

BASS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00754-LJO-BAM PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(ECF Nos. 40, 43, 59, 60, 61)

Plaintiff Lamont Shepard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 17, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. On May 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed

an Objection, and on June 4, 2012, Defendants filed an Objection which have been considered by

the Court.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1

Case 1:10-cv-00754-LJO-BAM Document 62 Filed 06/05/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 17, 2012, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed January 4, 2012, is DENIED;

3. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed January 19, 2012, is GRANTED

IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

a. Defendant Bass’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 

b. Defendant Miranda’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and

4. This action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 5, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00754-LJO-BAM Document 62 Filed 06/05/12 Page 2 of 2