Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-03196/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-03196-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE GONZALEZ, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CATE, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:11-cv-3196-GEB-EFB P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 8, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

/////

Case 2:11-cv-03196-GEB-EFB Document 63 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 8, 2015, are adopted in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a third amended (ECF No. 49) is granted;

3. Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s SAC (ECF No. 35) is denied; and

4. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of any order adopting this

recommendation to file a third amended complaint that complies with Local Rule 220.1

Dated: February 26, 2015

 

1

Plaintiff need not file another amended complaint. His proposed third amended 

complaint was filed on February 4, 2015, and will be screened by the magistrate judge in due 

course.

Case 2:11-cv-03196-GEB-EFB Document 63 Filed 02/26/15 Page 2 of 2