Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00047/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00047-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Abdulamir Al-Asadi, an individual,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

City of Phoenix, a municipality; Clint

Crockett, in his individual capacity as an

officer with the City of Phoenix Police

Department; Kane Kimble, in his

individual capacity as an officer with the

City of Phoenix Police Department; and

Robert Metrick, in his individual

capacity as an officer with the City of

Phoenix Police Department,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-0047-PHX-DGC

ORDER

Defendants Kane Kimble and Robert Metrick have filed a partial motion to dismiss counts

one, two, and four of Plaintiff’s first amended complaint for failure to comply with A.R.S.

§ 12-821.01. Dkt. #3. Plaintiff’s response (Dkt. #6) and Defendants’ reply (Dkt. #7) have

been filed. The Court will grant the motion.

Defendants Kimble and Metrick argue that Plaintiff failed to file a timely notice of claim

with them individually concerning Plaintiff’s claims for negligence and/or gross negligence

(count one), false arrest/imprisonment (count two), and intentional infliction of emotional

distress (count four). Plaintiff does not dispute this assertion. Because Defendants’ motion

does not request relief beyond dismissal of the individual claims asserted against Kimble and

Case 2:09-cv-00047-DGC Document 8 Filed 02/09/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Metrick, the Court does not address Plaintiff’s arguments concerning the City’s respondeat

superior liability for Kimble and Metrick’s actions.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ partial motion to dismiss counts one, two, and four

of Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (Dkt. #3) is granted. Counts one, two, and four of

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint are dismissed as against Defendants Kane Kimble and

Robert Metrick.

DATED this 9th day of February, 2009.

Case 2:09-cv-00047-DGC Document 8 Filed 02/09/09 Page 2 of 2