Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02341/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02341-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 12:22 Securities Fraud

---

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN F RA NCISC O 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT TO AUGUST 29, 2008

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

Paul H. Dawes (Bar No. 55191) 

John C. Tang (Bar No. 212371) 

Andrew M. Farthing (Bar No. 237565) 

140 Scott Drive 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: 650.328.4600 

Facsimile: 650.463.2600 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

David M. Friedman (Bar No. 209214) 

Samuel B. Lutz (Bar No. 241165) 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: 415.391.0600 

Facsimile: 415.395.8095 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Waste 

Connections, Inc., Defendants Mittelstaedt, Davis, 

Dupreau, Bouck, Chambliss, Eddie, Foos, Hall, 

Hansen, Hunt, Little, Moser, and Rose, and 

Specially-Appearing Defendants Harlan and Razzouk 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

KENNETH TRAVIS, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

RONALD J. MITTELSTAEDT, et al., 

Defendants, 

and 

WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC., 

Nominal Defendant. 

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-02341-JAM-GGH 

“CONSOLIDATED ACTION” 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED 

CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDER 

DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT TO AUGUST 

29, 2008 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 85 Filed 07/22/08 Page 1 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN F RA NCISC O 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT TO AUGUST 29, 2008

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, by Order entered March 19, 2008, this Court dismissed the 

Corrected Verified Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint with leave to amend; 

WHEREAS, on April 8, 2008, Plaintiffs filed the Verified First Amended 

Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint (“Amended Complaint”); 

WHEREAS, in anticipation of the parties’ participation in a mediation in May, 

2008, and upon stipulation of the parties, the Court extended Defendants’ deadline to answer, 

move, or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint until June 10, 2008 in an Order dated 

April 16, 2008; 

WHEREAS, the parties made substantial progress toward a potential settlement of 

this action as a result of the above-referenced mediation; 

WHEREAS upon the stipulation of the parties, on May 30, 2008, the Court 

extended Defendants’ deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Amended 

Complaint until June 30, 2008; 

WHEREAS upon the stipulation of the parties, on June 20, 2008, the Court 

extended Defendants’ deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Amended 

Complaint until July 30, 2008; 

WHEREAS since the Court’s May 30 and June 20, 2008 Orders, the parties have 

continued to make substantial progress toward a potential settlement of this action; and 

WHEREAS, the parties desire a further brief extension of time to continue their 

settlement discussions and documentation of a potential settlement without expending resources 

in responding to the Amended Complaint; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 

Defendants’ deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Amended 

Complaint shall be extended to August 29, 2008. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 85 Filed 07/22/08 Page 2 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN F RA NCISC O 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT TO AUGUST 29, 2008

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: July 21, 2008 Respectfully submitted, 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

By: /s/ Andrew M. Farthing 

Andrew M. Farthing 

 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

Waste Connections, Inc., Individual 

Defendants Mittelstaedt, Davis, 

Dupreau, Bouck, Chambliss, Eddie, 

Foos, Hall, Hansen, Hunt, Little, 

Moser, and Rose, and SpeciallyAppearing Defendants Harlan and 

Razzouk 

COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN 

& ROBBINS LLP 

By: /s/ James I. Jaconette (by AMF) 

James I. Jaconette 

 

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 85 Filed 07/22/08 Page 3 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN F RA NCISC O 4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT TO AUGUST 29, 2008

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

 Upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, Defendants’ 

deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Verified First Amended Consolidated 

Shareholder Derivative Complaint shall be extended to August 29, 2008. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 21, 2008 

/s/ John A. Mendez_______

 Hon. John A. Mendez 

United States District Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-02341-JAM-GGH Document 85 Filed 07/22/08 Page 4 of 4