Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_05-cv-01883/USCOURTS-ared-4_05-cv-01883-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

1

Doc. Nos. 12 and 13.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

In re: 

PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

DOROTHY P. HOOKS and

MARSHALL L. HOOKS

v.

WYETH, et al.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: 

:

MDL Docket No. 4:03CV1507-WRW

 4:05CV01883

PLAINTIFFS

 

 

 DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Pending is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 10). Defendants have

responded and Plaintiffs have replied.1

On December 14, 2006, I entered a PPO3 Show Cause Order, which gave Plaintiffs

twenty-one days to serve a fact sheet or show cause why a fact sheet could not be served on

Defendants. On January 25, 2007, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs did not

respond to the motion, and on February 9, 2007, it was granted. 

Plaintiffs’ reply is well-taken, and the Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the February 9, 2007 Order (Doc. No. 9) is VACATED, and the Clerk of the Court

is directed to re-open this case.

 However, as the reply suggested, Plaintiffs will be required to reimburse Wyeth for the

cost of preparing and filing the motions leading to the February 9, 2007 Order. Wyeth should

Case 4:05-cv-01883-BRW Document 14 Filed 03/08/07 Page 1 of 2
2

submit an itemization its expenses to Plaintiffs. If Plaintiffs believe the amount is unreasonable, 

they can file a motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Wm. R.Wilson, Jr. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:05-cv-01883-BRW Document 14 Filed 03/08/07 Page 2 of 2