Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05344/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05344-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CISCO SYSTEMS INC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARISTA NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-05344-BLF 

CORRECTED CASE MANAGEMENT 

ORDER

On December 3, 2015, the parties appeared before the Court for a Case Management 

Conference. Based on the briefing and the parties’ arguments at the case management conference, 

the Court finds that Defendant has demonstrated good cause to continue the trial date from August 

4, 2016 to November 21, 2016 and that Plaintiff’s showing of prejudice is not adequate to defeat 

the request for a three and a half month delay. Defendant has also shown good cause to increase 

the number of depositions and interrogatories. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Both parties are allowed up to 20 depositions total plus 30(b)(6) depositions.

2. Both parties are allowed 5 additional interrogatories (30 total).

3. The scheduling order is modified as follows:

EVENT DATE OR DEADLINE

Further Case Management Conference January 28, 2016 at 11:00 a.m.

Claims Construction Tutorial March 11, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.

Claims Construction Hearing March 18, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.

Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions August 4, 2016

Final Pretrial Conference November 3, 2016

Trial November 21, 2016

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 137 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

This Order is without prejudice to Defendant seeking additional discovery upon a showing 

of good cause. In light of the foregoing scheduling changes, the Court finds Defendant’s request 

to stay the patent claims MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 3, 2015

 ______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-05344-BLF Document 137 Filed 12/04/15 Page 2 of 2