Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00904/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00904-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LE ROI JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-07-0904 MMC

ORDER CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF RE:

UNSERVED DEFENDANTS

In light of the pending motions to dismiss, filed July 16, 2007 and July 31, 2007 by

defendants City of El Cerrito and El Cerrito Police Department, respectively, the Case

Management Conference currently scheduled for August 3, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. is hereby

CONTINUED to September 28, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement

shall be filed no later than September 21, 2007.

Additionally, the United States Marshal has advised the Court that it is unable to

effectuate service on defendants Certified Towing and Officer Wenk. The summons as to

Certified Towing was returned by the Marshal as “Undeliverable” because the address

provided by plaintiff “does not exist,” (see Docket No. 20), and the summons as to Officer

Wenk was returned by the Marshal as “Undeliverable” because there is “no officer by the

name given,” (see Docket No. 21). Accordingly, no later than September 3, 2007, plaintiff

must either (1) himself effectuate, and file proof of, service on said defendants or

(2) provide the Court with accurate information such that the Marshal is able to effectuate

Case 3:07-cv-00904-MMC Document 26 Filed 07/31/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

service on plaintiff’s behalf. If, as to any such defendant, plaintiff fails to comply with this

order by said date, plaintiff’s claims against such defendant will be dismissed without

prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 31, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-00904-MMC Document 26 Filed 07/31/07 Page 2 of 2