Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05718/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05718-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

KLEIN, 

O’NEILL & 

SINGH, LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 07-05718 JL 

SANG N. DANG (NO. 214558) 

sdang@koslaw.com 

KLEIN, O’NEILL & SINGH, LLP 

43 Corporate Park 

Suite 204 

Irvine, CA 92606 

Telephone: 949-955-1920 

Facsimile: 949-955-1921 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PLUSTEK INC. 

YUNG MING CHOU (NO. 172118) 

Chouyung@aol.com 

39111 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite 207 

Fremont, CA 94538 

Telephone: 510-713-8698 

Facsimile: 510-713-8690 

Attorney for Defendant 

SYSCAN, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PLUSTEK INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SYSCAN, INC. 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 07-05718 JL 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE 

SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case 3:07-cv-05718-JL Document 51 Filed 03/17/10 Page 1 of 5 Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document50 Filed03/16/10 Page1 of 5
KLEIN, 

O’NEILL & 

SINGH, LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE 

SCHEDULE Case No. C 07-05718 JL 

1

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2007, Plaintiff Plustek Inc. (“Plustek”) filed an 

action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Defendant 

Syscan, Inc. (“Plustek”), requesting, inter alia, for a declaratory judgment that Plustek does not 

infringe any claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,705,124 (the “‘124 Patent”), and that the ‘124 Patent is 

invalid. 

WHEREAS, the Court entered a Stipulated Order Regarding Case Schedule on 

January 11, 2010 (Docket No. 47). 

WHEREAS, through their respective counsel of record, the Parties have met and 

conferred to discuss extending the case schedule for three (3) months to allow the Parties time to 

adequately prepare the case. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, 

hereby stipulate to and respectfully request the Court to order the extended case schedule as 

follows: 

PLEADING OR EVENT DATE 

Close of fact discovery re merits of claims and 

defenses 

June 30, 2010 

Initial Expert Reports on issues on which party 

bears the burden of proof at trial 

August 13, 2010 

Rebuttal Expert Reports September 10, 2010 

Close of Expert Discovery October 22, 2010 

Dispositive Motions and Motions to Bifurcate 

Trial (last day to file) 

November 12, 2010 

Oppositions to Dispositive Motions and 

Motions to Bifurcate Trial 

December 3, 2010 

Case 3:07-cv-05718-JL Document 51 Filed 03/17/10 Page 2 of 5 Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document50 Filed03/16/10 Page2 of 5
KLEIN, 

O’NEILL & 

SINGH, LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE 

SCHEDULE Case No. C 07-05718 JL 

2

Replies to Dispositive Motions and Motions to 

Bifurcate Trial 

December 17, 2010 

Completion and Filing of Pretrial Order TBD 

Final Pretrial Conference TBD 

Trial TBD 

DATED: March 16, 2010 

By /s/ Yung Ming Chou 

Yung Ming Chou 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SYSCAN, INC. 

DATED: March 16, 2010 KLEIN, O’NEILL & SINGH, LLP 

By /s/ Sang N. Dang 

Sang N. Dang 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PLUSTEK INC. 

Case 3:07-cv-05718-JL Document 51 Filed 03/17/10 Page 3 of 5 Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document50 Filed03/16/10 Page3 of 5
KLEIN, 

O’NEILL & 

SINGH, LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE 

SCHEDULE Case No. C 07-05718 JL 

3

[PROPOSED] ORDER

It is so ORDERED. 

DATED: _____________________ _____________________________________ 

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-05718-JL Document 51 Filed 03/17/10 Page 4 of 5 Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document50 Filed03/16/10 Page4 of 5
KLEIN, 

O’NEILL & 

SINGH, LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 07-01603 JW - 1 -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on March 16, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court in compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-5(b) using the CM/ECF system which will 

send notification of the filing to all counsel of record. 

 /s/ Sang N. Dang 

 Sang N. Dang 

Case 3:07-cv-05718-JL Document 51 Filed 03/17/10 Page 5 of 5 Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document50 Filed03/16/10 Page5 of 5