Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02123/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02123-36/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THERASENSE, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

 BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY,

Defendant. /

No. C04-02123 MJJ; 04-3327 MJJ; 04-3732

MJJ

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION OF AUGUST 31,

2006 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

WITH RESPECT TO “SAMPLE

TRANSFER PATH”

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion For Leave To File Motion For Reconsideration Of

The August 31, 2006 Claim Construction Order With Respect To “Sample Transfer Path.” (04-

2123, Docket No. 222; 04-3732, Docket No. 146.) The Court has reviewed the Motion and finds

that Defendants have not raised any argument cognizable under Local Rule 7-9 that would cause the

Court to change its prior construction of this term. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants’

Motion For Leave.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 19, 2007 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-02123-WHA Document 361 Filed 09/19/07 Page 1 of 1