Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-2_04-cv-02196/USCOURTS-arwd-2_04-cv-02196-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FORT SMITH DIVISION

MICHAEL DISHNO PLAINTIFF

vs. CASE No. 04-2196

PATMONT MOTOR WERKS, INC.,

PATMONT MOTOR WERKS, STEVE 

PATMONT, GABE PATMONT, and 

TIM PATMONT DEFENDANTS

J U D G M E N T

On the 22nd day of August 2005, this matter came on for trial

to a duly selected jury consisting of eight members. Prior to the

case being submitted to the jury, plaintiff dismissed his claims

against Defendant Patmont Motor Werks on the record. On August 23,

2005, the case was submitted to the jury as against Defendants

Patmont Motor Werks, Inc., Steve Patmont, Gabe Patmont, and Tim

Patmont. A unanimous decision was reached as to the following

interrogatories:

INTERROGATORY NO. 1

On plaintiff’s strict liability claim, we the jury find in

favor of:

PLAINTIFF _____

DEFENDANTS X 

INTERROGATORY NO. 2

A. On plaintiff’s negligence claim, do you find from the

preponderance of the evidence that there was negligence on the part

of defendants which was a proximate cause of any damages?

YES _____

NO X 

Case 2:04-cv-02196-JLH Document 32 Filed 08/26/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
INTERROGATORY NO. 3

On plaintiff’s breach of implied warranty of merchantability

claim, we the jury find in favor of:

PLAINTIFF _____

DEFENDANTS X 

INTERROGATORY NO. 4

On plaintiff’s breach of implied warranty of fitness for

particular purpose claim, we the jury find in favor of:

PLAINTIFF _____

DEFENDANTS X 

INTERROGATORY NO. 5

On plaintiff’s breach of express warranty claim, we the jury

find in favor of:

PLAINTIFF _____

DEFENDANTS X 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED in accordance with the answer to

such interrogatories and verdict, that the plaintiff takes nothing

on his complaint filed herein. This matter is hereby dismissed

with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of August 2005.

/S/JIMM LARRY HENDREN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02196-JLH Document 32 Filed 08/26/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>