Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01673/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01673-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF; DECLARATION OF 

ANDREW M. JOHNSTONE IN SUPPORT THEREOF

Case No. 05 C 01673 RMW 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

Andrew P. Bridges (SBN: 122761) 

101 California Street, 39th Floor 

San Francisco, California, 94111 

Telephone: (415) 591-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 

Email: abridges@winston.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NAVTEQ CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

TELE ATLAS N.V. and TELE ATLAS 

NORTH AMERICA, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NAVTEQ CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 05 C 01673 RMW 

STIPULATED REQUEST AND 

[] ORDER TO EXTEND 

THE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF; 

DECLARATION OF ANDREW M. 

JOHNSTONE IN SUPPORT THEREOF 

Complaint filed April 22, 2005 

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby jointly request and 

stipulate to a short extension of the discovery cut-off and modification of pretrial deadlines as 

shown below pursuant to Rule 6, Fed. R. Civ. P., and Local Rule 6-2. 

This is a complex antitrust case in which discovery covers a nearly ten-year 

period. See Declaration of Andrew M. Johnstone ¶ 2, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

Consequently, document production in this matter has been voluminous with both sides 

producing a combined total of roughly 400,000 pages of documents to date. Id. Moreover, both 

sides continue to produce documents on a rolling basis. Id. ¶ 3. Additionally, the parties have 

met and conferred over various discovery-related issues multiple times and thus far have been 

able to avoid the Court’s involvement. Id. However, in order to complete outstanding document 

discovery, conduct deposition discovery, and otherwise defend and prosecute this case, the 

Case 5:05-cv-01673-RS Document 38 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF; DECLARATION OF 

ANDREW M. JOHNSTONE IN SUPPORT THEREOF

Case No. 05 C 01673 RMW 

parties agree that a short extension of the Court-ordered schedule is required. Id. ¶ 4. The 

parties note that this would be the first modification of the schedule originally set by the Court. 

Id. ¶ 5. Moreover, this proposed extension would delay the ultimate resolution of this case by 

only a few months compared to the existing schedule. Id. 

The parties specifically request new deadlines as follows: 

The current schedule: The Parties’ proposed schedule:

Fact discovery closes September 1, 2006 Fact discovery closes January 31, 2007 

Expert discovery closes December 31, 2006 Expert discovery closes March 30, 2007 

Dispositive motions due January 19, 2007 Dispositive motions due April 13, 2007 

Pre-trial conference on April 19, 2007 Pre-trial conference on July 12, 2007 

Trial to begin the week of May 14, 2007 Trial to begin the week of July 23, 2007 

 Because there is good cause for the modest extension of discovery and modification of 

the case schedule, the parties respectfully request the Court's approval of the proposed schedule. 

SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: August 14, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

By: /s/ David Eiseman

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 TELE ATLAS N.V. AND TELE ATLAS NORTH 

AMERICA 

Dated: August 14, 2006 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

By:/s/ Andrew P. Bridges

Attorneys for Defendant 

 NAVTEQ CORPORATION 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 5:05-cv-01673-RS Document 38 Filed 08/17/06 Page 2 of 2