Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07491/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07491-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. TO EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO SAC

Case No. C-06-7491-CRB

sf-2380287

ANGELA L. PADILLA (CA SBN 154863)

APadilla@mofo.com

LINDSAY T. BRAUNIG (CA SBN 244125)

LBraunig@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268-7000

Facsimile: 415.268-7520

JAMES R. STEFFEN (Pro Hac Vice)

JRSteffen@faegre.com

MICHAEL A. PONTO (Pro Hac Vice)

Mponto@faegre.com

Faegre & Benson LLP

2200 Wells Farago Center

90 South Seventh Street

Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901

Telephone: 612.766.7000

Facsimile: 612.766.1600

Attorneys for Defendant

TARGET CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC., a California 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota 

corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. C-06-7491-CRB

STIPULATION TO EXTENSION 

OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO 

RESPOND TO SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 3:06-cv-07491-CRB Document 34 Filed 08/31/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. TO EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO SAC

Case No. C-06-7491-CRB 1

Defendant Target Corporation’s response to the Second Amended Complaint, filed 

August 24, 2007, is due on September 4, 2007. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties,

through their counsel, hereby stipulate that Target shall have until September 11, 2007, to respond 

to the Second Amended Complaint.

Dated: August 29, 2007 ANGELA L. PADILLA

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Angela L. Padilla

Angela L. Padilla

Attorneys for Defendant

TARGET CORPORATION

Dated: August 29, 2007 TALI L. ALBAN

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND 

CREW LLP

/s/ Tali L. Alban

 Tali L. Alban

Attorneys for Plaintiff

WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.

GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION

I, Angela L. Padilla, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation to Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Second Amended Complaint. In 

compliance with General Order 45, concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained 

from each of the other signatories and I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for 

subsequent production for the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party.

Dated: August 29, 2007.

/s/ Angela L. Padilla

August 29, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-07491-CRB Document 34 Filed 08/31/07 Page 2 of 2