Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00175/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00175-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

F.W. AGGREGATE, INC., et al., CASE NO. CV F 06-0175 AWI LJO

Plaintiffs, ORDER TO RESCHEDULE MANDATORY

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

vs.

Date: July 26, 2006

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Time: 8:30 a.m.

OF INTERIOR, et al., Dept.: 8 (LJO)

Defendant.

 /

This Court set a June 6, 2006 mandatory scheduling conference. Plaintiffs F.W. Aggregate, Inc.

and F.W. Holdings, Inc. (collectively “plaintiffs”) recently filed a first amended complaint, and no

defendant has appeared in this action. As such, postponement of the mandatory scheduling conference

is appropriate. On the basis of good cause, this Court:

1. ORDERS plaintiffs, if they have not done so already, to forthwith serve each defendant

with a summons and first amended complaint and to file proofs of such service with this

Court;

2. VACATES the June 6, 2006 mandatory scheduling conference;

3. RESETS the mandatory scheduling conference for July 26, 2006 at 8:30 a.m. in

Department 8 (LJO) of this Court. The parties are encouraged to appear at the mandatory

scheduling conference by telephone by arranging a one-line conference call and then

adding the Court at (559) 499-5680;

Case 1:06-cv-00175-AWI-LJO Document 13 Filed 05/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. ORDERS the parties, no later than July 19, 2006, to file a Joint Scheduling Report which

includes the information required byExhibit A to the February 16, 2006 order setting the

original scheduling conference and to e-mail a copy of the Joint Scheduling Report as an

attachment to ljoorders@caed.uscourts.gov and formatted in WordPerfect or Word;

5. ORDERS the parties to otherwise comply with the February 16, 2006 order setting the

original scheduling conference; and

6. ORDERS plaintiffs to serve of a copy this order on each defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 30, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00175-AWI-LJO Document 13 Filed 05/30/06 Page 2 of 2