Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05459/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05459-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 At the hearing on September 8, 2006, the Court construed Defendants’ Motion for Certification

for Contempt Findings Against Joe Santiago Campos as a Renewed Motion to Compel the Deposition

of Joe Santiago Campos.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARYLON BOYD, ET AL.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF

SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

Case No. C-04-05459 MMC (JCS)

AMENDED ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR CERTIFICATION OF CONTEMPT

FINDINGS AGAINST JOE SANTIAGO

CAMPOS [Docket No. 118]; AND DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL

PLAINTIFFS TO ATTEND

PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS

[Docket No. 125]

On July 31, 2006, Defendants filed a Motion for Certification for Contempt Findings Against

Joe Santiago Campos1

 (the “Renewed Motion to Compel”), and on August 4, 2006, Defendants filed

a Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to Attend Psychological Evaluations (the “Motion for Evaluation”).

The Motions came on for hearing on September 8, 2006. Dennis Cunningham, counsel for

Plaintiffs, appeared. Blake Loebs and Scott Wiener, counsel for Defendants, appeared.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Motion for Evaluation is DENIED. All Plaintiffs

entered into a binding stipulation that they will not present, on motions or at trial, any expert witness

opinions or testimony on the emotional distress, psychological or mental injury of any Plaintiff, and

will not present any testimony or other evidence regarding any mental health or emotional

counseling or treatment of any of the Plaintiffs. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Renewed Motion to Compel is DENIED

without prejudice. The parties stipulated, and the Court ORDERS, that Marylon Boyd shall have no

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 140 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

contact with any percipient witnesses to the events of May 5, 2004, that underlie this action. 

Counsel shall meet and confer to exchange lists of such percipient witnesses and, if the parties

cannot agree on a list, they will submit competing lists to Magistrate Judge Spero for a final

decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2006 _______________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 140 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2