Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04786/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04786-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT - C 06-04786 CRB Page 1

McCARTHY, JOHNSON & MILLER 

LAW CORPORATION

LORI A. NORD, ESQ., #87993

595 Market Street, Suite 2200

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 882-2992

Facsimile: (415) 882-2999

E-mail: lnord@mjmlaw.us

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PIPE TRADES

DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 36 HEALTH AND

WELFARE TRUST FUND; BOARD OF

TRUSTEES OF THE PIPE TRADES DISTRICT

COUNCIL NO. 36 PENSION TRUST FUND;

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PIPE TRADES

DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 36 APPRENTICE

TRAINING TRUST FUND; BOARD OF

TRUSTEES OF THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA

PIPE TRADES INDUSTRY LABORMANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE

TRUST FUND,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RAMCON COMPANY, INC., a California

Corporation,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-04786 CRB

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

AND PROPOSED ORDER 

Date: November 17, 2006

Time: 8:30 A.M.

Place: Crtm. 8, 19th Floor

Pursuant to this Court’s order in the above-entitled action,

the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

A. Service of process and parties not served: There are no

additional parties to be served.

B. Jurisdiction and venue: This action was originally filed

in this court on August 7, 2006. The defendant was personally

Case 3:06-cv-04786-CRB Document 9 Filed 11/08/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT - C 06-04786 CRB Page 2

served with the Summons and Complaint, and other initial notices

and orders) on August 23, 2006. Defendant was served with the

Amended Complaint by mail on August 30, 2006 and has not yet

answered the lawsuit. (See, Proof of Service and Declaration of

Service attached to Amended Complaint, both filed with the court on

August 30, 2006.) Plaintiffs requested that defendant’s default be

entered by the Clerk of the Court. Defendant’s default was entered

on October 2, 2006. Jurisdiction is based upon the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act (hereinafter referred to as

“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. Section 1001, and more specifically Section

1132. Venue is proper under both ERISA and the pertinent

collective bargaining agreement.

C. Anticipated motions: We hoped to have this case settled

by now. Defendant informed us that it sent checks to pay the

balance due on October 27, but we have not received them. Hence,

we will be filing a Motion for Default Judgment within the next

week.

D. Anticipated or remaining discovery: Not applicable. See

C above.

E. Further proceedings, including setting dates for

discovery cutoff, pretrial and compliance with local rules 235-7,

235-9 and 235-10: Not applicable. See C above.

F. Appropriateness of special procedures: Plaintiffs admit

that such procedures are not applicable to this action.

G. Modification of standard pretrial procedures: Not

applicable. See C above.

H. Prospects for settlement: Likely not applicable. See C

above.

Case 3:06-cv-04786-CRB Document 9 Filed 11/08/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT - C 06-04786 CRB Page 3

I. Other matters; issues: Because defendant’s default has

been entered and plaintiffs will be filing a Motion for Default

Judgment shortly, plaintiffs request that the November 17, 2006

Case Management Conference be canceled or at least continued to a

date on or after December 22, 2006.

Dated: November 7, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

McCARTHY, JOHNSON & MILLER

LAW CORPORATION

By: ________________________________

LORI A. NORD

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED that the November 17, 2006 Case Management

Conference is continued to ____________________________________. 

Dated: ____________________ ____________________________________

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

January 5, 2007 at 8:30 a.m. November 8, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-04786-CRB Document 9 Filed 11/08/06 Page 3 of 3