Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00471/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00471-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAMISONI VIRIVIRI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AFFINITY DEFAULT SERVICES, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:20-cv-00471 TLN AC PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 

undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On March 13, 2020, 

mail send to the plaintiff was returned to the court, and plaintiff was informed that an updated 

address was due by May 21, 2020. Plaintiff did not provide an updated address, and mail was 

returned undeliverable on four other occasions, the most recent being April 28, 2020. On April 

17, 2020, defendant Bank of America filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 13, Plaintiff did not 

oppose the motion. 

 Plaintiff has failed to comply with the court’s Local Rules, which require that a party 

appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change within sixty-three days. 

Local Rule 183(b) as. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned 

by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of a current address. Further, 

plaintiff has entirely failed to participate in this case since it was removed from State Court. 

Case 2:20-cv-00471-TLN-AC Document 17 Filed 06/17/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 

prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s orders. See Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110, 183(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one 

(21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: June 16, 2020 

Case 2:20-cv-00471-TLN-AC Document 17 Filed 06/17/20 Page 2 of 2