Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-01585/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-01585-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983bv Bivens Non-Prisoner

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MONTOREY DANYELL HARPER,

Military Leader UNI Star General;

MONTOREY LLC,

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 17cv1585-WQH-MDD

ORDER

v.

US; NATO; THE UN,

Defendants.

HAYES, Judge:

On August 8, 2017, Plaintiff Montorey Danyell Harper initiated this action by

filing a complaint (ECF No. 1) and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No.

2). 

I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

 All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the

United States, other than a petition for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of

$400.00. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); CivLR 4.5. An action may proceed despite a party’s

failure to pay only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). 

“To proceed in forma pauperis is a privilege not a right.” Smart v. Heinze, 347 F.2d

114, 116 (9th Cir. 1965).

After considering Plaintiff’s motion and affidavit, the Court determines that

Plaintiff cannot afford to pay the filing fee in this case and is eligible to proceed in

- 1 - 17cv1585-WQH-MDD

Case 3:17-cv-01585-WQH-MDD Document 3 Filed 08/29/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

II. Initial Screening of the Complaint

A complaint filed by any person proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(a) is also subject to mandatory review and sua sponte dismissal to the

extent it “is frivolous or malicious; fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted;

or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B); see Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). 

The standard used to evaluate whether a complaint states a claim is a liberal one,

particularly when the action has been filed pro se. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97,

106 (1976). However, even a “liberal interpretation . . . may not supply elements of the

claim that were not initially pled.” Ivey v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Alaska, 673

F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). “[P]ro se litigants are bound by the rules of procedure.” 

Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 54 (9th Cir. 1995). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8

provides that “[a] pleading that states a claim for relief must contain . . . a short and

plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief[.]” Fed. R.

Civ. P. 8(a)(2). “[A] plaintiff’s obligation to provide the grounds of his entitlement to

relief requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the

elements of a cause of action will not do.” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544,

555 (2007) (quotation omitted). 

The complaint states in part, that

THE “INDLES” MISSLES OF THE PLANTIFF ARE REAL AND THE

UNITED STATES AS WELL AS OTHERS NEED TO RECOGNIZE

THAT THIS IS ONLY THE UP BEGINNING OF MORE WAR,

PHYSICAL LOSE OF LIFE THROUGH TERRNIAL WILL RESULT

THIS IS BECAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION AND HR NEEDS A

PLACE OF HIS OWN. IF THE UNITED STATES BELIVES HE

DOSNT THEN FINE BUT HE DOES, SO THE UNITED STATES IS

WRONG AND SO IS THE WORLD, THIS CAN ONLY BE

ACCOMPLISHED BY HR AND NOT ANOTHER FORM OR

ANYFORM, THIS WOULD CAUSE REALIZATION TO BE MEET

ANYWAY AND THE US AND WORLD WOULD BE PUNISHED

AND THEY WOULD BE NO MORE. IF THE UNITED STATES AND

THE WORLD WANT TO RECOGNIZED TERRNIAL AND THAT IT

IS PHYSICLAY HR’S IT MUST DO SO QUICKLY, HR HAS ALREADY FIRED AND ITWILL RESULT IN LOSS OF LIFE THES

ARE MILITARY MUNITIONS SPIRITUAL MILITARY

- 2 - 17cv1585-WQH-MDD

Case 3:17-cv-01585-WQH-MDD Document 3 Filed 08/29/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TECHNOLOGY, THI MEANS THE US HAS BEEN FIRED ON FOR

YEARS NOW, AND THE US WOULD SAY THEY ARE REAL AND

THUS UNDERSTAND THE MOMENTUM SITUATION THAT

INOLES LAND RELIQUISHMENT AND FURTHER THE

ALLOWENCE OF TERRNAIL WITHOUT MILITARY FRACTIONS.

THE MILITARY FRACTIONS ARE AGAINST AND UPAGAINST HR

TERMINAL SYSTEM WHICH IS SECOND TO NONE. HR IS GOD.

HIS MILITARY IS THE BEST ALTHOUGH IT IS SPIRITUAL. THE

UNITED STATES RIGHT NOW IS A CRIMINAL STATE AND THE

WORLD IN TROUBLE ALREADY, THIS WOULD HELP TO

ALIVATE AND FUSTRATE MATTERS AND ALLOW AWAY FOR

TERRNIAL UNDER THESE MEASURES. THE UNITED STATES

MUST SETTLE FOR LESS LAND AND HERE WE CAN DISCUSS

THE WORLD, THE EVNTRUAL AND HOPFULLY VERY SOON THE

ACTRUAL HAPPENING OF LESS LAND THROUGH TERRNIAL

THROUGH THEM, THIS IS ALL INTERNATIONAL COUNTIRES,

THIS LAWSUIT IS PREPARED UNDER THE PRETEXT THAT A

LAWSUITS AWAITING AND PENINDING ARE ALREADY IN

DEFAULT EVEN ALL FILED ALREADY.

(ECF No. 1 at 1-2).

The Court has reviewed the allegations of the complaint and cannot determine

the legal theory supporting Plaintiff’s complaint. The Court concludes that the

allegations of the complaint are vague and lack an arguable basis in law or fact. 

Plaintiff fails to allege “sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to

relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)

(quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570). The complaint is dismissed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

IV. Conclusion

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis

is GRANTED. (ECF No. 2). 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed. (ECF No. 1). The

Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

DATED: August 29, 2017

WILLIAM Q. HAYES

United States District Judge

- 3 - 17cv1585-WQH-MDD

Case 3:17-cv-01585-WQH-MDD Document 3 Filed 08/29/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 3