Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_95-cv-05947/USCOURTS-caed-1_95-cv-05947-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAX LOPEZ,

Plaintiff, CV F 95 5947 LJO WMW P 

vs. ORDER RE: FINDINGS & 

 RECOMMENDATIONS (#169)

G. A. SMITH, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302. 

 On September 5, 2007, findings and recommendations were entered,

recommending dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be

granted. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within twnety days. No

objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

proper analysis. 

Case 1:95-cv-05947-LJO -WMW Document 170 Filed 09/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on

September 5, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted on Plaintiff’s claim of

deliberate indifference regarding inadequate diet.

3. Plaintiff’s claim of denial of outdoor exercise is dismissed for failure to state a

claim.

4. Plaintiff’s cruel and unusual punishment claim regarding the bus transfer is

dismissed.

5. Plaintiff’s claim as to Defendant Smith is dismissed, and Defendant Smith is

dismissed from this action.

6. This action is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings on

Plaintiff’s failure to protect claims against Defendant Yates.. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 27, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:95-cv-05947-LJO -WMW Document 170 Filed 09/28/07 Page 2 of 2