Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02762/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02762-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COREY COLEMAN GRAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

Capt. ORTIZ; et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-2762 SI (pr)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On November 7, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff, Corey Coleman Gray, to show cause

why this action should not be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which provides that a

prisoner may not bring a civil action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 "if the prisoner

has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an

action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is

frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the

prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The court

identified seven prior dismissals that appeared to count under § 1915(g) and ordered Gray to

show cause why in forma pauperis should not be denied and the action dismissed. Gray has

filed numerous documents since the order to show cause issued. None of Gray's filings has

shown that any of the prior dismissals cannot properly be counted as dismissals under § 1915(g)

and none of Gray's filings has shown that this action should not be dismissed. 

Accordingly, Gray's in forma pauperis application is DENIED and this action is dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This dismissal is without prejudice to Gray asserting his claims

in an action for which he pays the full filing fee at the time he files his complaint. In light of the

Case 3:05-cv-02762-SI Document 26 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

dismissal of this action, all other pending motions are DENIED. The clerk shall close the file.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January _17, 2006 ______________________

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-02762-SI Document 26 Filed 01/18/06 Page 2 of 2