Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-03149/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-03149-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOHN M. LUEBBERKE, City Attorney

State Bar No. 164893

TED DANIEL WOOD, Deputy City Attorney

State Bar No. 191768

425 N. El Dorado Street, 2nd Floor

Stockton, CA 95202

Telephone: (209) 937-8333

Facsimile: (209) 937-8898

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF STOCKTON, BlAIR ULRING, MARK MARQUEZ,

and TIMOTHY MCDERMOTT, municipal employees

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISABEL BEL MONTEZ; ISABEL BEL 

MONTEZ, Guardian Ad Litem for I.G. 

and J.G. minors; JOSEPH GARCIA SR.; 

ESTATE OF JOSEPH GARCIA,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal 

corporation; et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:10-cv-03149-MCE-EFB

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF PRETRAIL 

SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINE

Assigned to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.

Dept. 

Complaint Filed: 11/22/2010

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiffs, through their attorneys of 

record, James Cook and Ben Nisenbaum, Law Offices of John Burris; and Defendants, City of 

Stockton, et al., by and through attorneys of record, Ted Wood, Office of the City Attorney, that 

the following deadlines be continued:

Discovery Completion: July 18, 2016 (Prior date was June 1, 2016)

All other dates remain as set forth in the Court’s Second Amended Pretrial Scheduling 

Order (Document 23), and as amended by the Stipulation and Order for Continuance of Pretrial 

Scheduling Order Deadlines (Document 35). 

The brief continuance is requested to permit Plaintiffs and defendants to address 

outstanding discovery issues brought about the difficulty in client contact among Plaintiffs and 

their counsel. The parties respectfully request the Court grant this stipulation to allow them 

adequate time to prepare the case for trial.

Case 2:10-cv-03149-MCE-EFB Document 39 Filed 05/16/16 Page 1 of 2
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: 5/9/16 LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L. BURRIS

By: /s/ James Cook

JAMES COOK

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Isabel Bel Montez, et al. 

Dated: 5/9/16 JOHN M. LUEBBERKE

CITY ATTORNEY 

By: /s/ Ted Daniel Wood

TED DANIEL WOOD

Attorneys for Defendants

City of Stockton, Stockton of Stockton Police

Department, and Blair Ulring, Chief of Police 

O R D E R 

In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the deadline for the 

completion of discovery specified above is continued with the foregoing request. All other dates 

and deadlines set forth in the Court’s the Court’s Second Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order 

(Document 23), and as amended by the Stipulation and Order for Continuance of Pretrial 

Scheduling Order Deadlines (Document 35) remain in full force and effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2016

Case 2:10-cv-03149-MCE-EFB Document 39 Filed 05/16/16 Page 2 of 2