Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00133/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00133-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESUS MOREJON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

PAUL M. SCHULTZ, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-00133-OWW-TAG-HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 11)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On August 19, 2005, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED because

Petitioner’s claim challenges his original sentence and therefore should have been brought in the

trial court as a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 11). This Report and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within thirty days from the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed

timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

Case 1:05-cv-00133-OWW -TAG Document 12 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation filed August 19, 2005 (Doc. 11), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 11, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00133-OWW -TAG Document 12 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2