Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00767/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00767-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THUONG VAN TRAN, et al.,

NO. CIV. S-05-767 LKK/PAN

Plaintiffs,

v. O R D E R

ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH

AUTHORITY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

The court is in receipt of plaintiffs’ counsel’s ex parte

application for leave to file his third motion for preliminary

injunction in paper in lieu of the mandatory e-filing procedures.

For the reasons set forth, the request is denied.

Plaintiffs have successfully e-filed their motions for

preliminary injunction on two prior occasions. In their third

motion for preliminary injunction, plaintiffs may file a Request

for Judicial Notice pointing the court to previously-filed exhibits

contained within the record. There is no need to re-file such

Case 2:05-cv-00767-LKK -DAD Document 60 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

documents. 

Secondly, the main thrust of plaintiffs’ counsel’s request is

that he should be able to deliver voluminous papers to the Office

of the Clerk and that this court should shift his e-filing burden

to the Clerk of the Court. The court will not do so.

Plaintiffs’ counsel’s ex parte application is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 29, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:05-cv-00767-LKK -DAD Document 60 Filed 08/02/05 Page 2 of 2