Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-00597/USCOURTS-casd-3_13-cv-00597-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

– 1 – 13cv597 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JESUS LOPEZ, 

 Plaintiff, 

Case No. 13-cv-00597-BAS(WVG) 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT 

MOTION TO CONTINUE 

PRETRIAL DATES 

(ECF No. 46) 

 v. 

CITY OF IMPERIAL, ET AL.,

 Defendants. 

Presently before the Court is a joint motion to continue pretrial dates in light of 

the continuance of the trial to June 7, 2016 and final pretrial conference to April 18, 

2016. (See ECF No. 45.) Having read and considered the moving papers, and good 

cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the joint motion (ECF No. 46) and ORDERS

as follows: 

1. The parties must comply with the pretrial disclosure requirements of Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) no later than March 7, 2016. Please be advised that 

failure to comply with this section may result in the sanctions provided 

for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on the introduction of 

experts or other designated matters in evidence. 

2. Counsel shall confer and take the action required by Local Rule 

Case 3:13-cv-00597-BAS-WVG Document 47 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 2
 – 2 – 13cv597 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

16.1(f)(4)(a) no later than March 14, 2016. 

3. Counsel for the Plaintiff(s) must provide opposing counsel with the 

proposed pretrial order for review and approval and take any other action 

required by Local Rule 16.1(f)(6)(a) no later than March 28, 2016. 

4. Written objections, if any, to any party’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) pretrial 

disclosures shall be filed and served no later than March 28, 2016. Please 

be advised that the failure to file written objections to a party’s pretrial 

disclosures may result in the waiver of such objections, with the 

exception of those made pursuant to Rules 402 (relevance) and 403 

(prejudice, confusion or waste of time) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 

5. The proposed pretrial order shall be lodged with chambers no later than 

April 4, 2016 and shall be in the form prescribed in Local Rule 

16.1(f)(6)(c). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 3, 2016 

 

Case 3:13-cv-00597-BAS-WVG Document 47 Filed 02/03/16 Page 2 of 2