Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_07-cv-00309/USCOURTS-azd-4_07-cv-00309-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cheryl Wells, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Hon. Jan E. Kearney, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-309-TUC-FRZ

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States

Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Marshall whereby she recommends granting several motions

to dismiss and addresses several other motions.

The Report and Recommendation was issued on June 29, 2009. The parties have not

filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation, the time for filing objections

expired, and the Court will not consider any untimely objections.

The Court has reviewed the entire record and concludes that Magistrate Judge

Marshall’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R.

Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v.

Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) United States Magistrate Judge Marshall's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #87) is

ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED.

(2) The motions to dismiss filed by the defendants (Doc. #’s 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32) are

granted; these defendants are dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter

judgment accordingly.

Case 4:07-cv-00309-FRZ-JR Document 103 Filed 08/18/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

(3)Defendant Morgan Stanley and Steve Fishman’s motion for summary disposition (Doc.

#35) of their motion to dismiss is denied as moot.

(4) Plaintiff is ordered to show cause as to why Defendant Phillip Schwartz’s motion for Rule

11 sanctions should not be granted; Plaintiff shall show cause by filing a brief addressing the

sanctions issue no later than August 31, 2009.

(5) Plaintiff’s motions for extension of time (Doc. #’s 41, 66) to file her responses to the

motions to dismiss are granted.

(6) Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. #42) and motion for leave

to file a second amended complaint (Doc. #71) are denied.

(7) Plaintiff’s motion for default (Doc. #43) against Cia Wells and Alan Belauskas is denied.

(8) As pretrial proceedings still remain in this case, this case is hereby referred back to

Magistrate Judge Jacqueline J. Marshall for all pretrial proceedings and report and

recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P.

72, and LRCiv 72.1, 72.2, and 72.3 of Rules of Practice of the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona. 

All future filings in this case shall be designated:

CV 07-309-TUC-FRZ (JJM)

DATED this 18th day of August, 2009.

Case 4:07-cv-00309-FRZ-JR Document 103 Filed 08/18/09 Page 2 of 2