Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01171/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01171-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Pursuant to Local Rule 143 and 144, the parties stipulate, and ask the Court to order, that 

the deadline for the Plaintiff’s Oppositions to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment be 

extended to Friday, January 24, 2014, that deadlines for the Defendants’ Replies to Plaintiff’s 

Oppositions be extended to Friday, February 14, 2014, and that the hearing for the motions be

rescheduled for Friday, February 28, 2014. Good cause exists for this modification of the 

schedule:

1. All defendants recently filed motions for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 145 (Pai), 

146 (G. Williams, MD), 147 (Dhillon), 148 (Capitano and Uppal), 152 (D. Williams), 

153 (Bick), 154 (Aguilera and Andreasen), 155 (Mehta)). These eight motions consist 

of substantial briefing and exhibits for the ten defendants in this case.

CHARLES C. JAMES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DEEPAK MEHTA, et al.,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 2:10-cv-01171-LKK-DAD-P

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

MODIFY FILING DEADLINES AND 

HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case 2:10-cv-01171-KJM-DAD Document 160 Filed 11/08/13 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. The current deadlines are as follows: the Plaintiff’s Oppositions to the Defendants’ 

Motions for Summary Judgment are due by November 22, 2013; the Defendants’ 

Replies to Plaintiff’s Oppositions are due by November 29, 2013; the hearing for the 

motions is scheduled for December 6, 2013. 

3. Plaintiff is represented by certified law students from the U.C. Davis Civil Rights 

Clinic. This extension will enable the law student’s full participation in briefing the 

Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The students’ 

fall semester ends on December 5, 2013 and their law school examination period ends 

on December 23, 2013. Their spring semester will commence on January 9, 2013.

Thus, with the extension, the students would have approximately six weeks to prepare

their opposition and the Defendants would have three weeks to prepare their replies. 

4. There is currently no date set for trial in this case. Thus, any rescheduling of the

responses and replies to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment will not disrupt 

any other deadlines or hearings in this case. 

5. The parties have not previously sought an extension for Motions for Summary 

Judgment.

For these reasons, the parties ask the Court to extend the deadline for filing the responses 

and replies regarding Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and the hearing date for the 

motions. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: November 7, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 

/S/ Carter C. White

_____________________________

Carter C. White

Attorney for Plaintiff, Charles C. James

Case 2:10-cv-01171-KJM-DAD Document 160 Filed 11/08/13 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

/S/ Kathleen J. Williams

Dated: November 7, 2013 _____________________________

Kathleen J. Williams

Williams & Associates

Attorney for Defendants,

Aguilera, Andreasen, Bick, Dhillon, 

Mehta, Pai, Williams, M.D. 

and Williams N.P.

Dated: November 7, 2013 /S/ Mitchell A. Wrosch

_____________________________

Mitchell A. Wrosch

Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP

Attorney for Defendants,

C. Capitano, D.O. and R.K. Uppal 

Case 2:10-cv-01171-KJM-DAD Document 160 Filed 11/08/13 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the summary judgment briefing 

schedule is modified as follows:

Plaintiff’s Oppositions to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed and 

served no later than Friday, January 24, 2014. 

The Defendants’ Replies to Plaintiff’s Oppositions to Motions for Summary Judgment 

shall be filed and served no later than Friday, February 14, 2014. 

The hearing now set for December 6, 2013, is continued to Friday, February 28, 2014, at 

10:00 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 7, 2013

/jame1171.msjstip

Case 2:10-cv-01171-KJM-DAD Document 160 Filed 11/08/13 Page 4 of 4