Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00994/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00994-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HARINDER SINGH, NO. CIV.S-06-0994 GEB DAD PS

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

By an order filed August 10, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to

submit the appropriate filing fee within twenty days and was

cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that

this action be dismissed. The twenty-day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not paid the appropriate filing fee or otherwise

responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the

United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the

Case 2:06-cv-00994-GEB-DAD Document 4 Filed 09/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being

served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 

written objections with the court. Such a document should be

captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal

the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

Cir. 1991).

DATED: September 14, 2006.

DAD:lg

Ddad1/orders.prose/singh0994.f&r

Case 2:06-cv-00994-GEB-DAD Document 4 Filed 09/14/06 Page 2 of 2