Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01740/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01740-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Case No. C 06-01740 JW

LEGAL_US_W # 56082645.1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ROBERT B. NICHOLS (SB# 224763) 

nichols@nicholslawgroup.com 

300 South First Street, Suite 205 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Telephone: (408) 298-9755 

Facsimile: (408) 298-9699 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

DAVID DAY 

STEPHEN H. HARRIS (SB# 184608) 

stephenharris@paulhastings.com 

CAROLINE L. ELKIN (SB# 209156) 

carolineelkin@paulhastings.com 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

515 South Flower Street 

Twenty-Fifth Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228 

Telephone: (213) 683-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AT&T DISABILITY INCOME PLAN 

(formerly known as SBC DISABILITY INCOME PLAN) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

DAVID DAY, ) 

Plaintiff, ) Case No. C 06 01740 JW 

 ) 

vs. ) 

 ) JOINT STIPULATION AND 

 ) PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO 

 ) SCHEDULING ORDER 

SBC DISABILITY INCOME PLAN, ) 

 Defendant. ) 

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF SCHEDULING ORDER

 WHEREAS, David Day has retained Robert B. Nichols to represent him; 

 WHEREAS, new counsel has requested additional time to review the file, become 

familiar with the case, and prepare Mr. Day’s Motion For Summary Judgment; 

 WHEREAS, new counsel will not need or request an additional continuance; 

 THEREFORE, all parties and their counsel stipulate to and request the Court’s approval 

of the following extended times and extended anticipated time for filing cross motions for 

Summary Judgment. 

1. Cross Motions for Summary Judgment July 2, 2007 

XXXXXXXXXXX

Case 5:06-cv-01740-JW Document 23 Filed 04/24/07 Page 1 of 3
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Case No. C 06-01740 JW

LEGAL_US_W # 56082645.1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2. Opposition to Cross Motions for Summary Judgment July 16, 2007 

3. Reply to Oppositions to Cross Motions July 30, 2007 

4. Hearing Date: September 17, 2007 at 9:00 A.M., or 

as determined by the Court. 

 The parties stipulate to and request that the Court take off calendar the time for the 

preliminary pretrial conference currently set for August 6, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. and the deadline 

for preliminary pretrial conference statements currently set for July 27, 2007. 

 Should the case not be resolved on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment, the Court will 

determine new dates for the preliminary pretrial conference, preliminary pretrial conference 

statements, and the trial. 

 I, Robert B. Nichols, attest, pursuant to General Order No. 45, Rule X, that Melvyn D. 

Silver concurred in the filing of this document. 

Dated: April 23, 2007 /s/ Robert B. Nichols 

 Robert B. Nichols 

 Attorneys for David Day 

Dated: April 23, 2007 /s/ Caroline L. Elkin

 Stephen H. Harris 

 Caroline Elkin 

 Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

ORDER

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

1. Cross Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed July 2, 2007; Oppositions filed July 16, 

2007, and Reply Memoranda filed July 30, 2007. The Hearing Date shall be September 17, 

2007, at 9:00 A. M. or as determined by the Court. 

2. The Court hereby removes from its calendar the preliminary pretrial conference currently set 

for August 6, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. and the deadline for preliminary pretrial conference statements 

currently set for July 27, 2007. 

Case 5:06-cv-01740-JW Document 23 Filed 04/24/07 Page 2 of 3
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Case No. C 06-01740 JW

LEGAL_US_W # 56082645.1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3. Should the case not be resolved on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment, the Court will 

determine dates for the preliminary pretrial conference, preliminary pretrial conference 

statements, and trial. 

 San Jose, California, this _____ day of ________________, 2007. 

 _________________________________________ 

 JAMES WARE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

24 April 

Case 5:06-cv-01740-JW Document 23 Filed 04/24/07 Page 3 of 3