Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-00024/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-00024-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 04cv0024

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHOTOMEDEX, INC., Civil No. 04cv0024-L (CAB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS’

LETTER BRIEF

[Doc. No. 104]

v.

DEAN STEWART IRWIN; RA MEDICAL

SYSTEMS, INC.; and DOES 1-25, inclusive,

Defendants.

On November 10, 2006, a Court holiday, Defendants filed a document entitled “Declaration

Letter Brief in support of Motion to Quash Record Subpoenas issued by Plaintiff.” [Doc. No. 104.] The

filing of this document was not requested or approved by this Court. While the document purports to be

a declaration in support of a motion to quash, there does not appear to be a notice of motion filed on the

docket of the case. Further, the document does not comply with this district’s format requirements for

pleadings. See Civ. L.R. 5.1. Finally, the Court draws counsel’s attention to the Court’s scheduling

order dated April 27, 2006, which states, “Please be advised that counsel for the moving party must

obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will hear the motion.” [Doc. No. 83.] 

Because counsel has not complied with any of the aforementioned requirements, the Clerk of the Court

shall STRIKE Docket No. 104 from the docket of this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 14, 2006

CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-00024-JLS-CAB Document 105 Filed 11/14/06 Page 1 of 1