Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00159/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00159-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OSCAR GUZMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

GRUMA CORP., CHUCK DAWSON, 

and DOES 1 through 20, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 1:15-cv-00159-GEB-SKO

ORDER WITHDRAWING THE COURT’S 

ORDER FILED ON MARCH 5, 2015

I have considered an email communication sent to the 

courtroom deputy clerk yesterday in which Defendants’ pro hac 

vice counsel, Tom C. Lenox, states: 

The order dismisses as moot both our 

previously filed motions to dismiss, one of 

which was a motion to dismiss, or in the 

alternative, compel arbitration. This motion 

would still seemingly be relevant despite the 

filed FAC because the motion turns on whether 

there is a valid arbitration agreement, not 

the pleadings. How should we interpret the 

order’s effect on the motion to compel 

arbitration?

This email concerns the order filed on March 5, 2015 

(ECF No. 26). The March 5, 2015 Order should not have issued and 

is, therefore, withdrawn.

Further, the hearing on the dismissal motions filed 

February 4, 2015, (ECF Nos. 9-10), is rescheduled to commence at 

Case 1:15-cv-00159-GEB-SKO Document 27 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

9:00 a.m. on April 13, 2015. The hearing on the remand motion, 

(ECF No. 6), is still scheduled on March 16, 2015.

Dated: March 6, 2015

Case 1:15-cv-00159-GEB-SKO Document 27 Filed 03/06/15 Page 2 of 2