Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05616/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-05616-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No.: C-03-5616 MMC – 1 – DOCSSFO-12455057.1-KDARU

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

DOCSSFO-12428203.1

Bernard J. Casey (SBN 226347) 

Kirsten J. Daru (SBN 215346) 

Jennifer J. Brady (SBN 233440) 

REED SMITH LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3922 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 7936 

San Francisco, CA 94120-7936 

Telephone: 415.543.8700 

Facsimile: 415.391.8269 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LAZARIS ITALO FULLER 

James V. Fitzgerald, III (SBN 55632) 

Noah G. Blechman (SBN 197167) 

MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP

1211 Newell Avenue 

Post Office Box 5288 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: 925.939.5330 

Facsimile: 925.939.0203 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF RICHMOND, OFFICER 

CANTRELL, OFFICER R. THOMAS, 

OFFICER POMEROY, OFFICER MOODY, 

AND OFFICER FUNK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LAZARIS ITALO FULLER, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs.

CITY OF RICHMOND, OFFICER CANTRELL, 

OFFICER R. THOMAS, OFFICER POMEROY, 

OFFICER MOODY, and OFFICER FUNK, 

 Defendants. 

No.: C-03-5616 MMC 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE STIPULATION 

CONTINUING EXPERT DISCOVERY 

CUT OFF AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION 

DEADLINE

Honorable Maxine Chesney 

Case 3:03-cv-05616-MMC Document 89 Filed 10/06/06 Page 1 of 3
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No.: C-03-5616 MMC – 2 – DOCSSFO-12455057.1-KDARU

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

DOCSSFO-12428203.1

 Plaintiff Lazaris Italo Fuller (“Fuller”), and defendants City of Richmond, Officer Cantrell, 

Officer R. Thomas, Officer Pomeroy, Officer Moody and Officer Funk (“Defendants”), through their 

respective attorneys of record in this action agree and stipulate as follows: 

 WHEREAS, the expert discovery cut off in the above captioned case is currently October 27, 

2006; and 

 WHEREAS, the deadline for the parties to file dispositive motions is currently November 9, 

2006; and 

 WHEREAS, plaintiffs’ counsel need a brief extension of both of the foregoing dates to 

accommodate their schedules. 

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate, through their counsel of record, to the following: 

 (1) The expert discovery cut off currently scheduled for October 27, 2006 shall be 

continued until November 15, 2006; and 

 (2) The parties’ deadline for filing dispositive motions shall be continued from 

November 9, 2006 to November 29, 2006. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: October 5, 2006 

REED SMITH LLP 

By /s/ 

Bernard J. Casey, Esq. 

Kirsten J. Daru, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LAZARIS ITALO FULLER 

Case 3:03-cv-05616-MMC Document 89 Filed 10/06/06 Page 2 of 3
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No.: C-03-5616 MMC – 3 – DOCSSFO-12455057.1-KDARU

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

DOCSSFO-12428203.1

DATED: October 5, 2006 MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER & BORGES LLP

By: /s/ 

James V. Fitzgerald, III / Noah G. Blechman 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF RICHMOND, OFFICER CANTRELL, 

OFFICER R. THOMAS, OFFICER POMEROY, 

OFFICER MOODY, AND OFFICER FUNK 

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties hereto, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby 

Orders as follows: 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the expert discovery cut off currently scheduled for October 

27, 2006 shall be continued until November 15, 2006; and 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ deadline for filing dispositive motions shall be 

continued from November 9, 2006 to November 29, 2006. 

 The parties having made no showing as to good cause for the requested extensions, the

foregoing stipulation is hereby DENIED without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 6, 2006 

MAXINE CHESNEY 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-05616-MMC Document 89 Filed 10/06/06 Page 3 of 3