Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00680/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00680-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

In re:

BETSY WARREN LEBBOS, No. 2:08-cv-0440 FCD

Debtor, 

USBC CASE No. 06-22225-D-7

USBC ADV CASE No. 07-2006-D

USBC ADV CASE DCN: MPD-1

BETSEY WARREN LEBBOS, 

Appellant, 

v. ORDER OF NON-RELATED CASES

LINDA SCHUETTE,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

In re:

BETSY WARREN LEBBOS,

Debtor, No. 2:08-cv-0680 MCE

BETSEY WARREN LEBBOS,

Appellant,

v.

LINDA SCHUETTE,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

The undersigned judge declines to relate the above-captioned cases pursuant to Local

Rule 83-123(a). Assignment of the matters to the same judge is not likely to effect a

substantial savings of judicial effort or other economies. Both actions involve the same or

similar defendants, but the actions involve events specific to each party, the questions of fact

Case 2:08-cv-00680-MCE Document 5 Filed 04/14/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

are different, the questions of law are not novel, it is not clear that the same result should

follow in both actions, and assignment to different judges would not entail substantial

duplication of labor.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 11, 2008 

Case 2:08-cv-00680-MCE Document 5 Filed 04/14/08 Page 2 of 2