Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00937/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00937-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0937 GEB KJM P

vs

R. GUFFEE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of

civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 27, 2005, the court ordered, among other things,

that plaintiff describe in writing the outcome of each of the lawsuits he has filed while a prisoner

so that the court can determine whether plaintiff is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis

under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g).

On November 10, 2005, plaintiff filed his response. Plaintiff asserts he has filed

69 cases. He claims 30 of the cases settled and 39 are still pending. However, a brief review of

court records shows that plaintiff has had several cases dismissed for reasons other than the fact

that the case settled. See, e.g., CIV-S- 00-0653 LKK GGH P, CIV-S-04-1569 GEB GGH P,

CIV-S- 04-1599 LKK JFM P. Plaintiff has not complied with the court’s October 27, 2005

order, and appears to have misrepresented the status of his cases to the court in contravention of

Case 2:05-cv-00937-GEB -KJM Document 8 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Therefore, the court will recommend that this action be

dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 8, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

camp0937.56

Case 2:05-cv-00937-GEB -KJM Document 8 Filed 05/09/06 Page 2 of 2