Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-110/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 05-CV-3148 MMC [JCS] 

[Proposed] Order Granting Matsushita’s Administrative Mot. to File Docs. Under Seal 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

MEDIATEK, INC., OPPO DIGITAL, INC., and

MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL 

COMPUTER CORP., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC [JCS] 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF AND 

COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT 

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.’S MOTION 

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO 

FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; 

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK 

MEDIATEK, INC., 

Counterclaimant, 

v.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD. and PANASONIC CORPORATION 

OF NORTH AMERICA, 

Counterclaim Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Judge: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1201 Filed 06/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Case No. 05-CV-3148 MMC [JCS] 

[Proposed] Order Granting Matsushita’s Administrative Mot. to File Docs. Under Seal 

Before the Court is plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Matsushita Electric Industrial 

Co., Ltd.’s (“Matsushita”) Unopposed Motion for Administration Relief to File Documents 

Under Seal, specifically, for leave to file under seal Exhibits 2 and 5 to the Declaration of Aldo 

A. Badini in Support of Matsushita’s Opposition to MediaTek’s Motion for Continuance. 

Good cause appearing from the Declaration of Randall T. Garteiser, filed April 15, 2007, 

the motion is GRANTED with respect to Exhibit 2, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file the 

unredacted version of Exhibit 2 under seal. 

Because MediaTek has withdrawn its designation of confidentiality as to Exhibit 5, the 

motion is DENIED with respect to Exhibit 5, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Exhibit 5 in the 

public record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 20, 2007 

_________________________________________

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1201 Filed 06/20/07 Page 2 of 2