Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-225/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THOMSON 

SA’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL 

No. 07-5944-SC; MDL No. 1917 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v. Technicolor 

SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05724; 

Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee of the Circuit City 

Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust v. Technicolor 

SA, et al., No. 13-cv-00141; 

Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. v. Technicolor SA, et 

al., No. 13-cv-05264; 

Interbond Corporation of America v. 

Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05727; 

Office Depot, Inc. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 

13-cv-05726; 

Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Technicolor 

SA, et al., No. 13-cv-05723; 

P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, 

et al. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 31:cv05725; 

Schultze Agency Services, LLC, o/b/o Tweeter 

Opco, LLC, et al. v. Technicolor SA, Ltd., et al., 

No. 13-cv-05668; 

Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corp. v. 

Technicolor SA, No. 3:13-cv-05262; 

Target Corp. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 13-

cv-05686

No. 07-cv-5944-SC 

MDL No. 1917 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2426 Filed 03/07/14 Page 1 of 2 Case3:07-cv-05944-SC Document2398-1 Filed02/18/14 Page1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THOMSON 

SA’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL 

2 No. 07-5944-SC; MDL No. 1917 

Upon consideration of Thomson SA’s Administrative Motion to Seal portions of its 

Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Newly Filed Direct Action Plaintiffs’ (“DAPs”) 

Complaints, the Declaration of Jeffrey S. Roberts in support thereof, and good cause appearing 

therefore: 

The Court hereby GRANTS Thomson SA’s motion to seal and orders that the portions of 

Thomson SA’s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Newly Filed DAPs’ Complaints that 

reference Exhibits A through D and F though H to the DAPs’ Opposition to Thomson SA’s 

Motion to Dismiss shall be sealed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 Hon. Samuel Conti 

 United States District Judge 

Case3:07-cv-05944-SC Document2398-1 Filed02/18/14 Page2 of 2

March 7, 2014

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2426 Filed 03/07/14 Page 2 of 2