Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-03721/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-03721-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAMERON JERROD MARSHALL,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANDREW M. SAUL,

Defendant.

Case No. 19-cv-03721-SK 

ORDER REGARDING DEADLINES

Regarding Docket No. 19

On November 5, 2019, the Court stated the following in an Order extending Plaintiff’s 

deadline to file his motion for summary judgment to November 14, 2019:

the parties are admonished that parties are required to email proposed 

orders in Microsoft Word format to skpo@cand.uscourts.gov in 

accordance with the Court’s Standing Order and that the Court will 

not approve any further extensions absent a showing of extraordinary 

good cause. A heavy workload does not qualify as extraordinary good 

cause. Additionally, any stipulations or administrative motions for 

extensions shall be made before the deadline to provide time for the 

Court to rule, and time to file the required brief if the request is denied.

On November 19, 2019, five days after the deadline to file his motion for summary 

judgment, the parties, in violation of this clear Order, filed a stipulation to extend both Plaintiff’s 

and Defendant’s deadlines “due to a full workload and an unexpected medical concern.” (Dkt. 

No. 19.) So as to not harm Plaintiff, the Court will permit Plaintiff to file his motion late, by 

November 22, 2019, and will extend Defendant’s deadline to December 22, 2019. However, 

Plaintiff’s counsel is Ordered to Show Cause (“OSC”) in writing by no later than December 2, 

2019 why she should not be personally sanctioned in the amount of $750 for violating the Court’s 

Order by: (1) failing to ask for an extension before the deadline to provide time for the Court to 

rule, and time to file the required brief if the request was denied; (2) by relying on a heavy 

workload despite the Court’s Order that a heavy workload does not qualify as extraordinary good 

Case 3:19-cv-03721-SK Document 20 Filed 11/20/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

cause; and (3) by failing to email a proposed order in Microsoft Word format to 

skpo@cand.uscourts.gov in accordance with the Court’s Standing Order. Plaintiff’s counsel may 

file additional details regarding the unexpected medical concern under seal if such details are 

necessary to respond to the OSC. Additionally, Plaintiff’s counsel is admonished that the Court 

will consider reporting counsel to the professional standards committee for the Northern District 

of California for disciplinary action if she violates the Court’s orders again – and specifically if 

she misses a deadline that could harm her client.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 20, 2019

______________________________________

SALLIE KIM

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:19-cv-03721-SK Document 20 Filed 11/20/19 Page 2 of 2