Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02110/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-02110-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

WILLIAM J. FRIMEL (Bar No. 160287) 

bill.frimel@dlapiper.com 

CHRISTINE K. CORBETT (Bar No. 209128) 

christine.corbett@dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER US LLP 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-221 5 

Tel: 650.833.2000 

Fax: 650.833.2001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

ON COMMAND VIDEO CORPORATION 

DANIEL J. BERGESON (Bar No. 105439) 

dbergesonabe-1aw.com 

DONALD P. GAGLIARDI, (Bar No. 138979) 

dgagliardiabe-1aw.com 

HWAY-LING HSU, (Bar No. 196178) 

hhsu@be-1aw.com 

BERGESON, LLP 

303 Almaden Blvd., Ste. 500 

San Jose, CA 95 1 10-271 2 

Tel: 408.291.6200 

Fax: 408.297.6000 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 

DIGITAL INFINITY, INC., and Defendants 

ROBERT J. PRIKAZSKY and RICHARD J. 

LEACOCK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ON COMMAND VIDEO 

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DIGITAL INFINITY, INC., a California 

corporation; ROBERT J. PRIKAZSKY, an 

individual; and RICHARD J. LEACOCK, 

an individual. 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 06-021 10 JW (PVT) 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION 

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(l) 

-1- 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION, 

CASE NO. C06-02 1 10 JW (PVT) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge James Ware

3/23/2007

Case 5:06-cv-02110-JW Document 84 Filed 03/23/07 Page 1 of 3
The undersigned parties, through their respective counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE 

as follows: 

WHEREAS Plaintifflcounterdefendant On Command Video Corporation ("OCV"), on the 

one hand, and DefendantsICounterclaimants Digital Infinity, Inc., Robert J. Prikazsky and Richard J. 

Leacock, on the other hand (collectively, the "Parties") entered into a written Confidential 

Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release ("Settlement Agreement") with respect to this action; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Parties agreed to 

dismiss their operative complaint and counterclaims, respectively, in this action; and 

I WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Parties have agreed to 

bear their own attorneys' fees and costs in this action; 

THEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the Parties hereby 

stipulate, by and through counsel, to the dismissal with prejudice of the entirety of this action. Each 

party shall bear its own costs and attorneys7 fees. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: March 20,2007 DLA PIPER US LLP 

By: Is/ 

William J. Frimel 

Christine K. Corbett 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ON COMMAND VIDEO CORPORATION 

Dated: March 20,2007 BERGESON, LLP 

By: Is/ 

Daniel J. Bergeson 

Donald Gagliardi 

Hway-Ling Hsu 

Attorneys for Defendants 

DIGITAL INFINITY, INC., ROBERT J. 

PRIKAZSKY and RICHARD J. LEACOCK 

-2- 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION, 

CASE NO. C06-02 1 10 JW (PVT) 

Case 5:06-cv-02110-JW Document 84 Filed 03/23/07 Page 2 of 3
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 

I, Christine K. Corbett, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from counsel for Defendants. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the 

United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 20th day of March, 

2007 at East Palo Alto, California. 

Is/ 

Christine K. Corbett 

-3- 

I-~'17216167.1 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION, 

562559-3 CASE NO. C06-02 1 10 JW (PVT) 

Case 5:06-cv-02110-JW Document 84 Filed 03/23/07 Page 3 of 3