Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01484/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01484-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DURBIN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BONILLA, et al.,

Defendants.

1:11-cv-01484-AWI-JLT (PC) 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS 

SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AND WHY THE 

DISCOVERY STAY SHOULD NOT BE LIFTED 

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE 

COURT'S ORDER

On February 4, 2015, the Court granted counsel’s stipulation to stay discovery and granted

time to advise the Court whether the parties wanted a settlement conference. (Doc. 61) At that 

time, counsel reported they were in settlement negotiations and would notify the Court by the 

end of February whether they desired a settlement conference. (Doc. 60) They have not done so.

Therefore, within 14 days, the Court ORDERS counsel for both sides to show cause why 

sanctions, up to and including an order dismissing the action or an order striking the answer and 

entering default, should not be imposed and why the discovery stay should not be lifted due to 

their failure to comply with the Court’s orders. Alternatively, the parties may provide the 

information previously ordered within the same 14-day period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 4, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01484-DAD-JLT Document 62 Filed 03/04/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Case 1:11-cv-01484-DAD-JLT Document 62 Filed 03/04/15 Page 2 of 2