Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01229/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01229-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On October 9, 2015, the instant action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, was dismissed for 

failure to exhaust the administrative remedies and judgment was entered. (ECF Nos. 106, 107.) 

On October 29, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals 

for the Ninth Circuit.

Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for transcripts at government expenses of 

the May 13, 2015, evidentiary hearing. (ECF No. 111.) Plaintiff requests a copy of the transcripts be 

sent directly to the Ninth Circuit.

Inasmuch as the Court previously provided Plaintiff with a copy of the transcripts of the May 

13, 2015, evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 98), Plaintiff’s request must be DENIED. Plaintiff is advised 

that the Ninth Circuit has access to this Court’s electronic case file and will request any and all 

necessary documents needed directly from this Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for a copy of 

LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS,

 Plaintiff,

v.

M. PORTILLO, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-01229-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR 

TRANSCRIPTS AT THE GOVERNMENT’S 

EXPENSE AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT 

TO SERVE COPY OF THIS ORDER ON NINTH 

CIRCUIT

[ECF No. 111]

Case 1:13-cv-01229-AWI-SAB Document 113 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the transcripts to be sent directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is 

DENIED, and the Clerk of Court shall serve a courtesy copy of this order on the Ninth Circuit. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01229-AWI-SAB Document 113 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 2