Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-01117/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-01117-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 4:09-CV-01117-CW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MAYER BROWN LLP

JOHN NADOLENCO (SBN 181128) 

jnadolenco@mayerbrown.com 

350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503 

Telephone: (213) 229-9500 

Facsimile: (213) 625-0248 

MAYER BROWN LLP 

KEVIN RANLETT (admitted pro hac vice) 

kranlett@mayerbrown.com 

1999 K Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20006 

Telephone: (202) 263-3000 

Facsimile: (202) 263-3300 

Attorneys for Defendants 

AT&T Mobility LLC; New Cingular Wireless 

PCS LLC, New Cingular Wireless Services, 

Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

STEVEN MCARDLE, an individual, on behalf 

of himself, the general public and those 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC; NEW CINGULAR 

WIRELESS PCS LLC, NEW CINGULAR 

WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.; and DOES 1-

50, 

Defendants. 

___________________________ 

Cases No. 4:09-cv-01117-CW and 4:10-cv03440-CW 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

JOINT MEMORANDUM REGARDING 

NINTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION 

Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken 

KENNETH A. THELIAN, an individual, on 

behalf of himself, the general public and those 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC; NEW CINGULAR 

WIRELESS PCS LLC; and NEW CINGULAR 

WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., 

Defendants. 

Case 4:09-cv-01117-CW Document 208 Filed 09/26/12 Page 1 of 2
 

 -2- 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 4:09-CV-01117-CW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The Court’s order of September 11, 2012 directs the parties to submit a joint 

memorandum by September 25, 2012 proposing how these two cases should proceed in light of 

the Ninth Circuit’s decision remanding the McArdle case to this Court. See Order, Dkt. No. 205. 

In light of the parties’ joint motion for a seven-day extension of time to submit that joint 

memorandum, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby ORDERS that: 

The parties’ deadline to submit a joint memorandum shall be extended to and including to 

October 2, 2012. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

ENTERED this ____________ day of ___________________, 2010. 

_________________________ 

 The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:09-cv-01117-CW Document 208 Filed 09/26/12 Page 2 of 2