Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03616/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03616-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 865
Nature of Suit: Social Security - RSI (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

---

Stipulation of Extension of Time to File S/J - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Geri N. Kahn, Esq., SBN 148536 

400 Montgomery Street, Suite 810 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Tel. (415) 397-5446 

Fax (925) 889-4379 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JAMES MCHUGH, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

MICHALE J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of 

Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: No. 06-3616 JL 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DUE DATE 

OF PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF 

HIS MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT; AND [PROPOSED ORDER]

Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through 

their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 60-

day extension of time for Plaintiff’s counsel to file a brief in support of his Motion for 

Summary Judgment, in light of the following:

1. Plaintiff, James McHugh, retained counsel two days ago. His new counsel 

did not represent him at any point in the administrative process and is 

generally unfamiliar with his case. 

Case 3:06-cv-03616-JL Document 18 Filed 08/14/07 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation of Extension of Time to File S/J - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2. Plaintiff’s counsel has spoken with Shea Bond, Esq., defendant’s counsel 

(via telephone messages) and she has indicated that she is agreeable to a 

60 day -extension of time for counsel to prepare her brief. 

3. Plaintiff’s counsel has not yet had a chance to review the transcript 

thoroughly. She will need the extension of time to meet with Plaintiff 

more, to review the transcript and to prepare the motion for summary 

judgment. 

4. Should the request be granted, Plaintiff’s brief will be due on October 10, 

2007, Defendant’s reply brief on November 12, 2007 and Plaintiff’s 

response on December 12, 2007. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: August 9, 2007 /s/ Geri N. Kahn 

 GERI N. KAHN 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: August 9, 2007 /s/ Shea Lita Bond 

 SHEA LITA BOND 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorney for Defendants 

ORDER 

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: August 10, 2007 

 JAMES LARSON 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Larson

Case 3:06-cv-03616-JL Document 18 Filed 08/14/07 Page 2 of 2