Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00076/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00076-47/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Maximilian Monclova-Chavez, a federal prisoner, filed this civil rights action 

pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 

S.Ct. 1999 (1971) on January 15, 2008. This action proceeds against Defendant McEachern for 

excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All other defendants and claims have been 

dismissed.

On November 25, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 

Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be denied without prejudice. The findings and 

recommendations were served on all parties appearing in this action and contained notice that any 

objections were to be filed within fourteen days after service. (ECF No. 179.) More than fourteen 

days have passed and no objections have been filed. 

MAXIMILIAN MONCLOVA-CHAVEZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ERIC McEACHERN, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:08-cv-00076-AWI-BAM

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT

(ECF Nos. 178, 179)

Case 1:08-cv-00076-AWI-BAM Document 180 Filed 01/03/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, issued on November 25, 2013, are adopted in full;

and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2014 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 1:08-cv-00076-AWI-BAM Document 180 Filed 01/03/14 Page 2 of 2