Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00059/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-00059-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY W. MUNDY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF 

SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:23-cv-00059-TLN-CKD

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 29, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff 

filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 18.) 

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 

the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

the magistrate judge’s analysis.

Case 2:23-cv-00059-TLN-CKD Document 27 Filed 07/23/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations, filed on May 29, 2024 (ECF No. 16), are 

ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Court DISMISSES John Doe Administrator of Dietary Food, John Doe 

Supervisor, and Mayor Steinberg from this action with prejudice; 

3. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s ADA claim without leave to amend; and 

4. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further pre-trial 

proceedings. 

Date: July 22, 2024

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge

Case 2:23-cv-00059-TLN-CKD Document 27 Filed 07/23/24 Page 2 of 2