Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01958/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01958-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 00:0000 Cause Code Unknown

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BILL MARTINEZ, No. 2:05-cv-1958-MCE-GGH-PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

LAW OFFICES OF PANATONI,

FARRELL, FRALAUB,

Defendant.

__________________________/

On May 11, 2006, the magistrate judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice that any objections to the Findings and

Recommendations were to be filed within ten (10) days. No

objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the Court presumes any findings of fact are

correct. See Orland v. U.S., 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). 

The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

(9th Cir. 1983).

Case 2:05-cv-01958-MCE -GGH Document 10 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and,

good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt

the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed May 11,

2006, are ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule

11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED: July 6, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01958-MCE -GGH Document 10 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2