Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01799/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01799-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

32

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Miles, et al. v City of Oakland, et al. Case No.: 3:15-CV-01799-MMC 

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876

BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL

The Waterfront Building

2749 Hyde Street

San Francisco, California 94109

Telephone: (415) 353-0999

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990

Email: gfox@bfesf.com

Attorneys for Defendants

San Leandro Police Sergeants BRIAN ANTHONY, 

BOB SANCHEZ and CHRIS ALBERT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The MILES FAMILY: Ms. MONIQUE MILES, 

for herself and as Mother and Guardian of her 

minor children, Romelle Brown, Ajani Brown, 

Jordan Brown, and Jayden Brown; and, 

CHELSEA MILES, PAMELA MILES and 

ERIN MILES,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

Oakland Police Officers and Supervisors 

JOHN/JANE DOEs Nos. 1-15, the CITY OF 

OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA, and San Leandro 

Police Officers and Supervisors Sgt BRIAN 

ANTHONY, Sgt BOB SANCHEZ, Sgt CHRIS 

ALBERT, and JOHN/JANE DOEs Nos. 16-30,

Case No. 3:15-CV-01799-MMC

Assigned for all purposes to 

Senior District Judge Maxine M. Chesney

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING CONDITIONAL ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL AND SETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO APPROVE 

MINORS COMPROMISE

Case 3:15-cv-01799-MMC Document 59 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

32

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Miles, et al. v City of Oakland, et al. Case No.: 3:15-CV-01799-MMC 

The plaintiffs, acting by and through their attorneys of record, and defendants Brian Anthony, Bob 

Sanchez, and Chris Albert (the San Leandro defendants), acting by and through their attorneys of record, 

entered into a settlement of this matter on December 22, 2015 that is not an admission of liability and 

includes payment by the City of $25,000 to the plaintiffs and their attorneys including all damages, fees 

and costs and each side to bear their own fees and costs. A formal Settlement Agreement and Release 

Agreement will be executed by plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed a Notice of Settlement between the plaintiffs 

and the San Leandro defendants on January 4, 2016 (Docket No. 52.) The Court’s Conditional Order of 

Dismissal was filed on January 4, 2016 (Docket No. 55.) The Conditional Order required completion of 

the settlement process on or before March 7, 2016 by payment of the agreed upon consideration for 

settlement and filing a stipulation for an Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as to the entire action, each side 

to bear their own fees and costs, as to the plaintiffs and the San Leandro Defendants.

The parties have been cooperating on completing the settlement paperwork but the plaintiffs will 

need additional time to file their motion for an Order Approving Minors Compromise and said Order is a 

necessary part of completion of the settlement before the City may pay the agreed upon consideration of 

settlement.

Therefore, the plaintiffs, acting by and through their attorneys of record, and the San Leandro 

defendants, acting by and through their attorneys of record, have met and conferred regarding scheduling 

issues and have agreed to a stipulation for a Continuance of the Conditional Order of Dismissal as follows:

Plaintiffs will file and serve their Motion for an Order Approving Minors Compromise on or before 

March 25, 2016. The hearing on plaintiffs’ Motion for an Order Approving Minors Compromise will be 

held on or before April 22, 2016. 

The parties further stipulate and request that the time to comply with the Conditional Order of 

Dismissal be continued to May 20, 2016 which should provide sufficient time for the parties to complete 

the settlement with payment of the agreed upon consideration of settlement and for the parties to stipulate 

for an Order of Dismissal with Prejudice of the Entire Action, each side to bear their own fees and costs. 

Case 3:15-cv-01799-MMC Document 59 Filed 03/07/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

32

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Miles, et al. v City of Oakland, et al. Case No.: 3:15-CV-01799-MMC 

Dated: March 3, 2016 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL

By: /s/ Gregory M. Fox

Gregory M. Fox

Attorneys for Defendants Brian Anthony, 

Bob Sanchez, and Chris Albert

Dated: March 3, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF DENNIS CUNNINGHAM

By: /s/ Ben Rosenfeld

Dennis Cunningham

 Ben Rosenfeld 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION

I, Gregory M. Fox, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the 

foregoing documents. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of 

these documents has been obtained from each of its Signatories.

Dated: March 3, 2016 /s/ Gregory M. Fox

Gregory M. Fox

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE PROPOSED 

BRIEFING SCHEUDLE AND CONTINUANCE OF THE ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL 

IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE MAXINE M. CHESNEY

Case 3:15-cv-01799-MMC Document 59 Filed 03/07/16 Page 3 of 3