Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00823/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00823-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 

---

D

O

W

N

E

Y

B

R

A

N

D

L

L

P

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1081414.1 1

JOINT STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER 

DOWNEY BRAND LLP

JANLYNN R. FLEENER (Bar No. 169385) 

621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814-4731 

Telephone: (916) 444-1000 

Facsimile: (916) 444-2100 

jfleener@downeybrand.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE GOLDEN 1 CREDIT UNION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DONALD L. SCHLEY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE GOLDEN ONE CREDIT UNION, an 

entity of unknown form; 

BANK OF AMERICAN, an entity of 

unknown form; 

RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., an 

entity of unknown form; 

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., an 

entity of unknown form; 

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., 

an entity of unknown form; 

T.D. SERVICE COMPANY, an entity of 

unknown form; and 

DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:10-00823-JAM-KJN 

Hon. John A. Mendez, Courtroom 6 

JOINT STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER 

Complaint Filed: February 18, 2010 

Trial Date: None 

STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Local Rules 83-143 and 6-144, plaintiff DONALD L. SCHLEY (“Plaintiff”) 

and Defendant THE GOLDEN 1 CREDIT UNION (“Golden 1”) hereby stipulate and agree to 

extend the time for the Golden 1 to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint in the abovePDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:10-cv-00823-JAM-KJN Document 28 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 3
D

O

W

N

E

Y

B

R

A

N

D

L

L

P

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1081414.1 2

JOINT STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER 

entitled action, and apply for an order from the court granting said extension. 

This application and stipulation is based on the following facts: 

Plaintiff filed his original complaint in Sacramento County Superior Court on February 

18, 2010 against Golden 1, Bank of America, ReconTrust Company, Mortgage Electronic 

Registration Systems, Inc., BAC Home Loans Servicing and T.D. Service Company. On or about 

April 8, 2010, the Bank of America defendants removed the case to the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of California. The Bank of America defendants then filed a Motion 

to Dismiss. On or about May 12, 2010, Golden 1 also filed a Motion to Dismiss. 

Plaintiff has now filed voluntary dismissals of all defendants except the Golden 1. And on 

or about May 19, 2010, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint against the Golden 1. As a 

result of Plaintiff’s filings, the Court vacated the hearings on defendants’ motions to dismiss. 

On or about May 25, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion entitled “Motion for Federal Court 

Abstention and for Remand to State Court.” The motion is set for hearing on July 7, 2010. 

The Golden 1’s response to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is due before Plaintiff’s 

Motion for abstention and remand will be heard. But given that that motion is pending, the 

parties agree that the motion should be heard and decided before the Golden 1 files a responsive 

pleading. So, the parties desire to extend the Golden 1’s deadline to file a response to Plaintiff’s 

First Amended Complaint until after the Court rules on Plaintiff’s Motion for abstention and 

remand. 

Therefore, Plaintiff and the Golden 1, by and through their undersigned counsel, 

HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Golden 1 shall have an extension of time to respond 

to the First Amended Complaint until ten days after the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for 

abstention and remand. The motion is set for hearing on July 7, 2010, and thus the parties 

stipulate and agree to an extension until July 17, 2010. The Golden 1’s response is currently due 

June 7, 2010. Because the parties are seeking to stipulate to an extension of more than 30 days, 

court approval for the extension is required under Local Rule 6-144(a). 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:10-cv-00823-JAM-KJN Document 28 Filed 06/08/10 Page 2 of 3
D

O

W

N

E

Y

B

R

A

N

D

L

L

P

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1081414.1 3

JOINT STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER 

DATED: June 7, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. TRAPANI

By: /s/ DAVID M. TRAPANI

DAVID M. TRAPANI 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

DONALD L. SCHLEY 

DATED: June 7, 2010 DOWNEY BRAND LLP

By: /s/ JANLYNN R. FLEENER

JANLYNN R. FLEENER 

Attorney for Defendant 

THE GOLDEN 1 CREDIT UNION 

ORDER

The parties’ joint stipulated application for extension is GRANTED. Defendant the 

Golden 1 Credit Union shall have an extension until, and including, July 17, 2010, to file a 

response to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 7, 2010

/s/ John A. Mendez 

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:10-cv-00823-JAM-KJN Document 28 Filed 06/08/10 Page 3 of 3