Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01052/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01052-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN GORTHY, et al., CASE NO. CV-F-05-1052 REC LJO

 ORDER TO RESCHEDULE MANDATORY

Plaintiff, SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

vs. Date: January 27, 2006

Time: 8:15 a.m.

CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. Dept.: 6 (LJO)

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

This Court set a November 29, 2005 mandatory scheduling conference. Not all of the defendants

have been served or have appeared. As such, this Court is unable to conduct a meaningful scheduling

conference. On the basis of good cause, this Court:

1. DIRECTS plaintiff forthwith to pursue service of unserved defendants by publication;

2. RESETS the mandatory scheduling conference for January 27, 2006 at 8:15 a.m. in

Department 6 (LJO) of this Court. The parties are encouraged to appear at the mandatory

scheduling conference by telephone by arranging a one-line conference call and then

adding the Court at (559) 498-7322;

3. DIRECTS the parties, no later than five court days before the scheduling conference, to

file a Joint Scheduling Report which includes the information required by Exhibit A to

the August 17, 2005 Order Setting Scheduling Conference and to e-mail a copy of the

Case 1:05-cv-01052-NEW Document 39 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Joint Scheduling Report as an attachment to ljoorders@caed.uscourts.gov and formatted

in WordPerfect or Word; 

4. DIRECTS the parties to otherwise comply with the August 17, 2005 Order Setting

Mandatory Scheduling Conference and Requiring the Parties to Confer Pursuant to

F.R.Civ.P. 26(f); and

5. DIRECTS plaintiff to serve of a copy this order on unserved defendants, unless plaintiff

dismisses them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 29, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01052-NEW Document 39 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2