Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06720/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06720-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADRIAN JACOBO,

Plaintiff, CV F 04 6720 LJO WMW P 

vs. FINDINGS AND REOMMENDATION RE 

 MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 

 (DOC 10)

PHILLIP DOUGLAS, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel in a

civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his motion for injunctive relief prior to

his retention of counsel. The court will recommend denial of the motion

without prejudice to its renewal should counsel deem it appropriate.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s motion

for injunctive relief be denied without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United

States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Within ten days afer being served with these

findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with

the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be

captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed

within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time waives all

objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d

Case 1:04-cv-06720-LJO -WMW Document 47 Filed 09/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

449, 455 (9 Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the specified time th

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst,

951 F.2d 1153 (9 Cir. 1991). IT IS SO ORDERED. th

Dated: September 17, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

j14hj0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06720-LJO -WMW Document 47 Filed 09/18/07 Page 2 of 2