Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04166/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04166-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THINK VILLAGE-KIWI, LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 08-04166 SI

ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL

On December 16, 2009, plaintiff ThinkVillage-Kiwi filed a motion to compel the production of

documents. Two days later, during a case management conference, defendant Adobe agreed to produce

the documents named in plaintiff’s motion. Thereafter, defendant nonetheless responded to the motion

to compel, and in its response addressed issues related to the merits of plaintiff’s case. Plaintiff

subsequently sought leave to file a reply brief responding to defendant’s contentions.

As the discovery dispute between the parties has been resolved, there is no need for the Court

to intervene, and plaintiff’s motion to compel (Docket Nos. 186, 199) is therefore DENIED as moot.

The Court will disregard the assertions made in defendant’s letter brief regarding the merits of the case.

Therefore, plaintiff’s request for leave to file a reply brief (Docket No. 197) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2010 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04166-SI Document 201 Filed 01/13/10 Page 1 of 1