Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00559/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00559-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Benjamin T. Reyes, II 

Geoffrey Spellberg 

Kevin E. Gilbert 

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 

555 12th Street, Suite 1500 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Telephone: 510.808.2000 

Facsimile: 510.444.1108 

Attorneys for Defendants 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY & 

ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 

Southern California Edison Company, and 

California Electricity Oversight Board, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., 

City of Anaheim; City of Azusa; City of 

Banning; City of Burbank; City of Glendale; 

City of Los Angeles; City of Pasadena; City 

of Riverside; City of Santa Clara; City of 

Seattle; City of Vernon; Eugene Water and 

Electric Board; Los Angeles Department of 

Water and Power; Modesto Irrigation 

District; Northern California Power Agency; 

Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County; 

Sacramento Municipal Utility District; Salt 

River Project Agricultural Improvement and 

Power District; and Turlock Irrigation 

District, 

Defendants. 

Case No: 2:06-CV-0559-MCE-KJM 

 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND ON BEHALF OF ALL 

DEFENDANTS AND ORDER 

 

/ 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00559-MCE -KJM Document 42 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Comes now Plaintiff Pacific Gas and Electric Company, with authorization from all 

plaintiffs in this action, Defendants Northern California Power Agency and Arizona 

Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., by and through their respective attorneys of record and 

hereby stipulate as follows: 

As of the current time, the parties have been working diligently in an attempt to 

enter into a Stipulation with the approval of all parties, which addresses various 

procedural issues including setting of briefing schedules for preliminary motions as well 

as scheduling of Rule 26 compliance. The primary discussions pertaining to the 

Stipulation have been undertaken by Counsel for Plaintiff Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company and Defendants Northern California Power Agency and Arizona Electric Power 

Cooperative, Inc., with all other parties indirectly participating in those discussions. 

In hopes of obtaining all parties approval and participation in the procedural 

Stipulation referenced above, plaintiffs grant a one week continuance to all defendants to 

respond to the Complaints in the above referenced matters. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

Dated:_____________, 2006 By: _____________/S/____________________ 

 Russell Cohen 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 Pacific Gas & Electric Company 

 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 

Dated:_____________, 2006 By: ______________/S/___________________ 

Geoffrey Spellberg 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Northern California Power Agency & 

Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 10, 2006 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00559-MCE -KJM Document 42 Filed 04/10/06 Page 2 of 2