Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02204/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02204-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROLAND ADAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2204 RRB JFM P

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., ORDER AND

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed January 9, 2007, this court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial

statement on or before June 21, 2007. Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order. The court

will therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

16(f); Local Rule 11-110.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement.

2. The pretrial conference set for July 12, 2007 is vacated.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff at

McRae Correctional Facility, #13785-097, P.O. Drawer 30, McRae, Georgia 31055.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 11-110.

Case 2:05-cv-02204-RRB -JFM Document 64 Filed 07/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 3, 2007.

/001; adam2204.fpt2

Case 2:05-cv-02204-RRB -JFM Document 64 Filed 07/05/07 Page 2 of 2