Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03086/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03086-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

DAVID C. CLARK, et al.,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 07-3086 MEJ

ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO

PROVIDE FURTHER BRIEFING RE:

JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED

FACTS

On December 11, 2007, the Court ordered the parties to file a joint statement of undisputed

facts. In response, the parties filed a one-page statement stating that Defendants dispute all of the

United States' factual allegations. Upon review of the United States' memorandum in support of its

summary judgment motion, it is not clear how Defendants can dispute all facts therein. This would

mean that, for instance, Defendants dispute that they are taxpayers and that the United States Tax

Court entered a Stipulated Decision against them. Given that Defendants' opposition contains

certain facts that are identical to those set out in the United States' motion, it is not acceptable for

Defendants to state that they dispute all facts. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Defendants to

provide further briefing on this issue. Specifically, Defendants shall, line by line, address the United

States' factual statements and provide evidence which shows that each fact is in dispute. Defendants

shall file their supplemental briefing by January 15, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2008 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cv-03086-MEJ Document 32 Filed 01/08/08 Page 1 of 1