Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05504/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05504-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID BRINSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. STOCKMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. CV-F-03-5504 REC SMS P

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. 53)

Plaintiff David Brinson (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 3, 2005, Judge Coyle

granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss and directed the Clerk’s Office to

file in plaintiff’s second amended complaint, which had been lodged with the court by plaintiff on

January 31, 2005. The court has screened the second amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915A. With the exception of additional allegations concerning equitable tolling, the second

amended complaint virtually identical to the first amended complaint. As such it states a cognizable

claim for relief under section 1983 against defendants Stockman, Freitas, Meske, Dill, Pineda,

Marshall, Means, Nicholls, andGalaza for denial of procedural due process with respect to plaintiff’s

confinement in Administrative Segregation/Security Housing Unit.

///

///

///

///

Case 1:03-cv-05504-AWI -SMS Document 55 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Defendant Keller was dismissed from this action on May 6, 2005. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). (Doc. 54.)

2

Accordingly, defendantsStockman, Freitas, Meske, Dill, Pineda, Marshall, Means, Nicholls,

and Galaza shall file a response to plaintiff’s second amended complaint within thirty (30) days

from the date of service of this order.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 17, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05504-AWI -SMS Document 55 Filed 05/18/05 Page 2 of 2