Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-00082/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-00082-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

 10

 11

 12

 13

 14

 15

 16

 17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- 10cv0082-JM (BLM) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADOLPHUS MARCH,

Plaintiff,

v.

ABM SECURITY SERVICES, INC.

formerly known as AMERICAN

COMMERCIAL SECURITY SERVICES,

INC.,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 10cv0082-JM(BLM)

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO IMPOSE

COSTS OF THE EARLY NEUTRAL

EVALUATION CONFERENCE ON

DEFENDANT FOR FAILING TO

NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH

[Doc No. 31]

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:10-cv-00082-JM-BGS Document 33 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 2
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

 10

 11

 12

 13

 14

 15

 16

 17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- 10cv0082-JM (BLM) 

On March 22, 2010, Plaintiff’s counsel, David J. Van

Susteren, filed a motion to impose costs of the early neutral

evaluation conference. Doc. No. 31. As discussed in Judge Miller’s

March 22, 2010 order, Mr. Van Susteren’s application to appear pro

hac vice in this case has been denied. Doc. No. 32. Since Mr. Van

Susteren has not been admitted to practice before this court,

Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED without prejudice. Mr. Van Susteren

may re-file Plaintiff’s motion once he successfully completes his

application to appear pro hac vice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 24, 2010

BARBARA L. MAJOR

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:10-cv-00082-JM-BGS Document 33 Filed 03/24/10 Page 2 of 2