Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05311/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05311-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION RE MEDIATION

AND PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. C 04 5311 BZ (ARB) 1

JOSEPH E. POWELL, ESQ. - Bar No. 83957

PAUL M. VUKSICH, ESQ. - Bar No. 97144

Law Offices of Joseph E. Powell

582 Market Street, Suite 2001

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 788-4949

Facsimile: (415) 766-9949

E-mail: jepmain@hotmail.com

Attorney for Defendants and Counterclaimants

FRANK E. MAYO, ESQ. - Bar Mo. 42972

Law Offices of Frank E. Mayo

480 San Antonio Road, Suite 230

Mountain View, CA 94040

Telephone: (650) 964-8901

Facsimile: (650) 964-7293

E-mail: fmayolaw@aol.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs and Counter-defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMAICAN TRAVEL SPECIALISTS, ) Case No. C 04 5311 BZ (ARB)

INC., a California Corporation, )

And DENISE FRANCES PETERSON, )

)

Plaintiffs, ) JOINT STIPULATION RE

) MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED]

vs. ) ORDER

)

INVICTA GROUP, INC., a Nevada )

Corporation, WILLIAM FORHAN )

and DAVID SCOTT, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

INVICTA GROUP, INC., a Nevada )

Corporation, )

)

Counterclaimant, )

)

vs. )

)

JAMAICAN TRAVEL SPECIALISTS, )

INC., a California Corporation, )

And DENISE FRANCES PETERSON, )

)

Counterdefendants. )

____________________________________)

Case 3:04-cv-05311-BZ Document 26 Filed 02/01/2006 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:04-cv-05311-BZ Document 27 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION RE MEDIATION

AND PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. C 04 5311 BZ (ARB) 2

The parties to the above-entitled action submit this Joint Stipulation Re Mediation and

Proposed Order and request the Court to adopt the proposed order for the following reasons:

This case was originally set for arbitration, and an arbitration before Gregory D. Walker,

Edq. was scheduled for January 19, 2006. However, based upon the disclosures of the parties,

the parties entered into active settlement negotiations and agreed that arbitration would not

resolve the case and would be a waste of time and resources. The parties further agreed that in

the event that their settlement negotiations were not successful this matter would very likely be

resolved through a mediation. Accordingly, the parties did not go forward with the arbitration

and now request that the Court remove this case from arbitration, refer it to Court sponsored

mediations before Gregory D Walker, Esq., and extend the ADR deadline to February 28, 2006,

Mr. Walker has confirmed that he will be available during that time to conduct the mediation.

Dated: January 30, 2006

 /S/

Joseph E. Powell

Attorney for Defendants

Dated: January 30, 2006

 /S/

Frank Mayo

Attorney for Plaintiffs

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby removed from

arbitration and referred to court sponsored mediation before Gregory D. Walker, Esq. The

deadline for the ADR session of February 28, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________ ____________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-05311-BZ Document 26 Filed 02/01/2006 Page 2 of 2

February 2, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 3:04-cv-05311-BZ Document 27 Filed 02/02/06 Page 2 of 2