Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01598/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01598-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MICHAEL LENOIR SMITH, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DARREN ALBEE, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-1598 KJN P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By order filed November 13, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. After being granted multiple extensions of time, 

plaintiff was granted up to and including May 2, 2016, in which to file his amended complaint. 

That date has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise 

responded to the court’s order. 

 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 

 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

Case 2:15-cv-01598-JAM-KJN Document 22 Filed 05/10/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: May 10, 2016 

/cw/smit1598.fta 

Case 2:15-cv-01598-JAM-KJN Document 22 Filed 05/10/16 Page 2 of 2