Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-02821/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-02821-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Arthur Jerry Manning,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Joseph M. Arpaio,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 04-2821-PHX-SMM (DKD)

ORDER

The Complaint regarding this matter was filed December 8, 2004 (Doc. #1) and on

October 27, 2005 (Doc. #6), the Court issued its Screening Order directing that Defendant

Arpaio file an Answer as to Count I. On January 25, 2006, Defendant filed a Motion for

Summary Judgment (Doc. #8). On February 7, 2006, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Non-Service

and Request (Doc. #14) stating "I have never been served with the defendant's Motion for

Summary Judgment... ." On March 6, 2006, Defendant filed what is titled in the docket sheet

as "Reply to Response to Motion" (Doc. #15, 16, 17, 18, 19). As stated in the Clerk of the

Court's Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Electronically filed Documents filed March 7, 2006

(Doc. #20), it appears that the incorrect document type was selected. Defendant was instructed

to correct his deficiency within one (1) business day. To date, Defendant has not corrected the

required deficiency. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant correct the stated deficiency as stated in the Court's

Notice to Filer of Deficiencies upon receipt of this Order.

Case 2:04-cv-02821-SMM-DKD Document 21 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant provide Plaintiff a complete copy of his

Motion for Summary Judgment within five (5) working days from the date of this Order. It is

ordered that Defendant file a Notice stating that a copy has been provided to Plaintiff.

Upon the Court's own Motion, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the deadlines

previously stated in this Court's January 25, 2006 Order (Doc. #10), as follows:

1. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days after receipt of Defendant's Motion for Summary

Judgment within which to file a response together with supporting affidavits or other

appropriate exhibits and a separate Statement of Facts.

2. Defendant shall have fifteen (15) days thereafter to file a reply. 

DATED this 15th day of March, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-02821-SMM-DKD Document 21 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 2