Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01483/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01483-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In the parties’ joint scheduling report, the parties represented that “All Defendants have 

been dismissed with the exception of Hipolito Pelayo, an officer with [CHP] and Doe Defendants 

2-25, inclusive.” Doc. 74 at2:3-5. However, the docket still reflects that the City of Pixley, the 

Tulare County Regional Gang Enforcement Team, and the “State of California County of Tulare” 

are unserved defendants in this matter. In light the representation in the joint scheduling report, 

the Court will formally dismiss these Defendants so that the docket accurately reflects the true 

state of the case – the only claims remaining in this case are against Pelayo, and only Pelayo. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the “State of California County of Tulare,” 

the City of Pixley, and the Tulare County Regional Gang Enforcement Team are DISMISSED 

from this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 24, 2016 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

THE ESTATE OF CECIL ELKINS, JR., 

et al.,

Plaintiffs

v.

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et 

al.,

Defendants

CASE NO. 1:13-CV-1483 AWI SAB 

ORDER CLARIFYING DOCKET AND 

DISMISSING PARTIES

Case 1:13-cv-01483-AWI-SAB Document 107 Filed 03/24/16 Page 1 of 1