Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-01416/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-01416-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights

---

1 

15cv1416-GPC (DHB) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LUIS JESUS LOBATON, an individual, 

HEDY JULCA, an individual, DIEGO 

STEVEN LOBATON, and individual, 

and "B.C." a minor, by and through his 

mother and guardian ad litem, Hedy 

Julca, 

 Plaintiffs,

v. 

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipal 

corporation, NATHAN PARGA, an 

individual, KELVIN LUJAN, an 

individual, SAM EULER, an individual, 

ALI BAKHSHI, an individual, and DOES 

1 through 200, 

 Defendants.

 Case No.: 15cv1416-GPC (DHB) 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT 

MOTION TO CONTINE 

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER 

[ECF No. 30] 

On October 13, 2016, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Continue the Settlement 

Conference and to Amend the Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 30.) Good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Motion is GRANTED as follows: 

1. The Settlement Conference currently scheduled for November 9, 2016 at 2:00 

p.m. is continued to December 8, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Louisa S 

Case 3:15-cv-01416-GPC-DHB Document 31 Filed 10/19/16 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 3
2 

15cv1416-GPC (DHB) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Porter. The Conference will be held in Judge Bartick’s chambers at 333 West Broadway, 

Suite 1080, San Diego, California, 92116. If the parties wish, they may submit updated 

settlement statements directly to Magistrate Judge Bartick’s chambers no later than 

December 1, 2016. The parties may either submit confidential settlement statements or 

may exchange their settlement statements. The individually-named police officers are 

excused from attending the Conference in person. However, they must be available to be 

contacted by telephone throughout the duration of the Conference. 

 Pursuant to Rule 16.1(d) of the Local Rules, a Case Management Conference was 

held on May 13, 2016. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. By January 31, 2017, each party shall comply with the disclosure provisions 

in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This disclosure 

requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide expert 

testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving of 

expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails to 

make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to use 

evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In addition, 

the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c).

2. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal 

evidence under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D) and 26(e) by February 28, 2017. 

3. All discovery shall be completed by all parties by March 15, 2017. 

“Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of 

time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking 

into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure. Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with 

regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). The Court 

expects counsel to make every effort to resolve all disputes without court intervention 

through the meet and confer process. If the parties reach an impasse on any discovery 

Case 3:15-cv-01416-GPC-DHB Document 31 Filed 10/19/16 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 3
3 

15cv1416-GPC (DHB) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

issue, counsel shall file an appropriate joint motion within the time limit and according to 

the procedures outlined in Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick’s Civil Chambers Rules, 

which are posted on the Court’s website. A failure to comply in this regard will result 

in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent an order of the Court, no stipulation 

continuing or altering this requirement will be recognized by the Court.

4. All pretrial motions, including those addressing Daubert issues related to 

dispositive motions must be filed by April 12, 2017. Pursuant to Honorable Gonzalo P. 

Curiel’s Civil Pretrial & Trial Procedures, all motions for summary judgment shall be 

accompanied by a separate statement of undisputed material facts. Any opposition to a 

summary judgment motion shall include a response to the separate statement of undisputed 

material facts. Counsel for the moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the 

law clerk of the judge who will hear the motion. Motion papers MUST be filed and served 

the same day of obtaining a motion hearing date from chambers. A briefing schedule will 

be issued once a motion has been filed. The period of time between the date you request a 

motion date and the hearing date may vary. Please plan accordingly. Failure to make a 

timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. 

5. All remaining deadlines and requirements set forth in the Court’s May 16, 

2016 Scheduling Order remain in effect. (See ECF No. 22.) 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 19, 2016 

 _________________________ 

 LOUISA S PORTER 

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01416-GPC-DHB Document 31 Filed 10/19/16 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 3