Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01472/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01472-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMMY COLEMAN,

 Plaintiff,

v.

MIDLANDS CARRIER TRANSICOLD, et 

al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01472 --- JLT

SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)

Pleading Amendment Deadline: 3/20/2015

Discovery Deadlines:

Initial Disclosures: 1/26/2015

Non-Expert: 6/26/2015

Expert: 8/17/2015

 Mid-Discovery Status Conference:

 3/31/2015 at 9:00 a.m.

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:

Filing: 8/24/2015

Hearing: 9/21/2015

Dispositive Motion Deadlines: 

Filing: 7/6/2015

Opposition: 7/27/2015

Reply: 8/10/2015

Hearing: 8/31/2015

Pre-Trial Conference:

9/28/2015 at 10:00 a.m.

 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

Trial: 11/16/2015 at 8:30 a.m.

 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

 Jury trial: 3-5 days

Case 1:14-cv-01472-JLT Document 19 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 6
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I. Date of Scheduling Conference

January 9, 2015

II. Appearances of Counsel

Ann Hendrix appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

Aaron Clark appeared on behalf of Defendant.

III. Pleading Amendment Deadline

Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or 

motion to amend, no later than March 20, 2015.

IV. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) 

on or before January 26, 2015.

The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before June 

26, 2015, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before August 17, 2015.

The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before July 3, 2015, 

and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before July 17, 2015. The written designation of retained 

and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and 

(C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in 

compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered 

through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. 

Failure to designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the 

testimony or other evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to 

experts and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and 

opinions included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, 

which may include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement 

Case 1:14-cv-01472-JLT Document 19 Filed 01/21/15 Page 2 of 6
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.

A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for March 31, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. before the 

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United States District 

Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status 

Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in 

CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference and shall be e-mailed, in Word format to,

JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel may appear by telephone, provided a written request to so 

appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days before the 

noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to appear by telephone then it 

shall be the obligation of the requesting part(ies) to arrange a Court Call conference. 

V. Pre-Trial Motion Schedule

All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later 

than August 24, 2015, and heard on or before September 21, 2015. Non-dispositive motions are 

heard at 9:00 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California, before the 

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge. 

No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned 

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a 

good faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is 

unsuccessful, the moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and 

the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the 

conference call to the court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact 

Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. 

Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will 

be denied without prejudice and dropped from calendar.

In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order 

shortening time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order 

shortening time, the notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251. 

Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions by CourtCall, provided a written 

Case 1:14-cv-01472-JLT Document 19 Filed 01/21/15 Page 3 of 6
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days 

before the noticed hearing date. 

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than July 6, 2015. Opposition to the 

motion(s) shall be filed no later than July 27, 2015 and any reply shall be filed no later than August 

10, 2015. The hearing on the motion shall be August 31, 2015, before the Honorable Jennifer L. 

Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, 

California. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local 

Rules 230 and 260.

VI. Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary 

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the 

issues to be raised in the motion.

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where 

a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in 

whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) 

narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties 

incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of 

undisputed facts.

The moving party shall initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed 

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement 

of undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may 

be deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file 

the joint statement of undisputed facts.

In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred 

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. 

VII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

September 28, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, 

California before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

Case 1:14-cv-01472-JLT Document 19 Filed 01/21/15 Page 4 of 6
5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2). 

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format, 

directly to Judge Thurston’s chambers, by email at JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov. 

Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the 

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial 

conference. The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters 

set forth in the Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to 

be used by the Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

VIII. Trial Date

November 16, 2015, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, 

California, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

A. This is a Jury trial.

B. Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 3-5 days. 

C. Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of 

California, Rule 285.

IX. Settlement Conference

If the parties believe the matter is in a settlement posture and desire a settlement conference 

before a Magistrate Judge, they may file a joint request that the Court schedule a settlement 

conference. 

X. Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques to 

Shorten Trial

Not applicable at this time.

XI. Related Matters Pending

There are no pending related matters.

XII. Compliance with Federal Procedure

All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any 

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle 

Case 1:14-cv-01472-JLT Document 19 Filed 01/21/15 Page 5 of 6
6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

its increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

XIII. Effect of this Order

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda 

most suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If 

the parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are 

ordered to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by 

stipulation or by subsequent status conference.

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a 

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations 

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied 

by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good 

cause for granting the relief requested.

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 21, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01472-JLT Document 19 Filed 01/21/15 Page 6 of 6