Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02555/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02555-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CARL SHELTON 

Plaintiff(s) 

v. 

PATRICK J. MULLIGAN and THE 

MULLIGAN LAW FIRM 

Defendant(s).

Case No. 3:15-CV-02555-JCS 

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO 

ANSWER AND/OR OTHERWISE 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL 

COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Defendants Patrick J. Mulligan and the Mulligan Law Firm (“Defendants”) 

hereby file this Stipulation Extending Defendants’ Deadline to Answer and/or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s 

Original Complaint, informing the Court of the Parties’ agreement to extend the deadline for Defendants to 

answer/otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint until Friday, February 19, 2016, and stating as follows: 

1. Defendants were served on January 28, 2016, yet the return of service filed with the Court appears

to indicate incorrectly that they were served on January 26, 2016.1

 See ECF No. 16. 

2. To eliminate any confusion, Defendants’ counsel conferred with Plaintiff by telephone on

Monday, February 15, 2016, and Plaintiff agreed to allow Defendants until Friday, February 19, 2016 to answer or 

otherwise respond to his Complaint. 

3. This extension of time from February 16, 2016 to February 19, 2016 will not affect the schedule in

this case or alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. Consequently, in compliance 

with Local Rule 6-1, Defendants file this stipulation informing the Court of the parties’ agreement. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Jeffrey M. Tillotson, P.C. 

California Bar No. 139372 

TILLOTSON LAW

750 N. St. Paul Street, Suite 610 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

(214) 382-3041

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 

PATRICK J. MULLIGAN AND THE MULLIGAN LAW 

FIRM 

1

 The handwritten date on the return of service is not clear. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Dated: 2/18/16

Case 3:15-cv-02555-EMC Document 20 Filed 02/18/16 Page 1 of 1