Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04113/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04113-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

580 CALIFORNIA STREET, 11TH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING KENU’S 

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT CASE NO. 14-CV-04113-JD

TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

Marcus T. Hall, Bar No. 206495

marcus.hall@troutmansanders.com

Dean A. Morehous, Bar No. 111841

dean.morehous@troutmansanders.com

Craig C. Crockett, Bar. No. 265161

craig.crockett@troutmansanders.com

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415.477.5700

Facsimile: 415.477.5710

Attorneys for Plaintiff

KENU, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENU, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

EBAY INC. et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-CV-04113-JD

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

KENU’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT 

[Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)]

Case 3:14-cv-04113-JD Document 98 Filed 10/12/16 Page 1 of 3
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

580 CALIFORNIA STREET, 11TH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING KENU’S 

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT - 2 - CASE NO. 14-CV-04113-JD

This matter has come before the Court on Kenu’s Motion for Default Judgment against 

defendants Ali Chance (originally sued as eBay user known as “ayagroup”), Vladislav 

Doroshenko (originally sued as eBay user known as “allyexporter”), and LGC Gas Equipment 

(HK) Co., Limited (together, “Defendants”). Dkt. No. 96. After considering the papers and all 

evidence submitted, and after considering the factors discussed in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 

1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir.1986),

IT IS ORDERED that Kenu’s Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED, and that 

judgment will be entered against Defendants for each of Kenu’s claims for relief.

A permanent injunction is hereby entered against Defendants as follows: 

a. Enjoining and restraining Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, 

representatives, employees, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, related companies, 

partners, successors, predecessors, assigns and all persons acting for, with, by, through or under 

them, and each of them, from:

i. manufacturing, shipping, selling, offering for sale, exposing for sale, holding 

for sale, advertising, or promoting or otherwise moving, storing or disposing 

of in any manner any device for holding electronic products that are alleged to 

infringe Kenu’s U.S. Design Patent No. D960,707 (the “’707 patent”), or to 

falsely bear the product design trade dress of the Kenu AIRFRAME product 

(the “Kenu Trade Dress”), or bearing the names “WINDFRAME”, 

“AiIRFRAME”, or “AIRFRAME”, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or 

colorable imitation of same;

ii. using the designs of the ‘707 Patent, the Kenu Trade Dress, or the 

“AIRFRAME” trademark, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable 

imitation thereof, in connection with the distribution, advertising, offer for 

sale, exposure for sale, and/or sale of merchandise not the genuine products of 

Kenu;

iii. using the designs of the ‘707 Patent, the Kenu Trade Dress, or the 

“AIRFRAME” trademark, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable 

Case 3:14-cv-04113-JD Document 98 Filed 10/12/16 Page 2 of 3
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

580 CALIFORNIA STREET, 11TH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING KENU’S 

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT - 3 - CASE NO. 14-CV-04113-JD

imitation thereof in connection with the www.ebay.com website, other online 

services or activities, or any other goods or services not the genuine products 

of Kenu, in a manner that is likely to cause confusion, mistake, deception, or 

public misunderstanding that such website, other online services or activities, 

or other goods or services are produced or provided by Kenu, or are 

sponsored or authorized by or in any way connected or related to Kenu;

iv. passing off, inducing or enabling others to sell or pass off any products that 

infringe the ‘707 Patent, the Kenu Trade Dress, or the “AIRFRAME” 

trademark;

v. operating and/or hosting any website or webpage, or otherwise providing 

services enabling the sale, exposure for sale, or offer for sale of any products 

that infringe the ‘707 Patent, falsely bear the Kenu Trade Dress, or infringe 

the “AIRFRAME” trademark; and

vi. otherwise infringing the ‘707 Patent, Kenu Trade Dress, or “AIRFRAME” 

trademark, or infringing other Kenu intellectual property, damaging Kenu’s 

goodwill or otherwise competing unfairly with Kenu in any manner; 

Defendants are hereby given further notice they shall be deemed to have actual notice of 

the issuance and terms of such Permanent Injunction and any act by them or any one of them in 

violation of any of the terms thereof may be considered and prosecuted as contempt of this 

Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 289(2), Kenu is 

entitled to statutory damages in the amount of $250 from each of the Defendants for 

infringement of the ‘707 patent. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2016

United States District Judge

James Donato

Case 3:14-cv-04113-JD Document 98 Filed 10/12/16 Page 3 of 3