Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00934/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00934-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

O. Z. Martin,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 05-0934 FCD PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

Edward Almeida, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner prosecuting this civil rights

action without counsel. 

July 13, 2005, the court dismissed plaintiff’s claims

against defendants Edward Almeida and Tom L. Carey pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915A, with leave to amend. The court informed

plaintiff he could proceed against defendants Tan, Leftwich, S.

O. Obedoza, Tessie R. Rallos, G. Cassey, G. Croll and Alvaro C.

Traquina by submitting materials for service within 15 days, but

the court would construe his election so to proceed as consent to 

Case 2:05-cv-00934-FCD-EFB Document 10 Filed 08/04/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

dismissal of his claims against defendants Edward Almeida and Tom

L. Carey without leave to amend. 

July 26, 2005, plaintiff submitted materials for service of

defendants Tan, Leftwich, S. O. Obedoza, Tessie R. Rallos, G.

Cassey, G. Croll and Alvaro C. Traquina. I find plaintiff has

consented to dismissal of claims against defendants Edward

Almeida and Tom L. Carey without leave to amend. 

Accordingly, the court hereby recommends that claims against

defendants Edward Almeida and Tom L. Carey be dismissed without

prejudice. 

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: August 4, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00934-FCD-EFB Document 10 Filed 08/04/05 Page 2 of 2