Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00546/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00546-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LONNIE WILLIAMS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

J. JUNG HERNANDEZ, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-00546-AWI-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 5)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

ORDER TERMINATING ACTION

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On June 5, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DISMISSED for failure to raise a cognizable claim under section

2254, and the Clerk of Court enter judgment, thus terminating this

action. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. On

July 13, 2006, Petitioner filed a motion to extend time. On July

26, 2006, the court granted Petitioner an additional thirty (30)

Case 1:06-cv-00546-AWI-DLB Document 8 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

days within which to respond. To date, Petitioner has not filed

objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 5, 2006, are

ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED for

failure to raise a cognizable claim under section 2254;

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment; and,

4. This action is therefore TERMINATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00546-AWI-DLB Document 8 Filed 09/13/06 Page 2 of 2