Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00363/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00363-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3354178 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY 

PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOR OF ARBITRATION (Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST)

IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

Andra Barmash Greene (123931) 

agreene@irell.com 

A. Matthew Ashley (198235) 

mashley@irell.com 

840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400 

Newport Beach, California 92660-6324 

Telephone: (949) 760-0991 

Facsimile: (949) 760-5200 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JACOB SABATINO, individually, and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; RASIER, LLC, a Delaware 

limited liability company; RASIER-CA, LLC, 

a Delaware limited liability company; 

RASIER-DC, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company; RASIER-PA, LLC, a 

Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 

1 to 25, inclusive, 

Defendants.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS 

PENDING ARBITRATION AND 

VACATING HEARING AND 

CONFERENCE DATES 

Action Filed: January 26, 2015 

Case 3:15-cv-00363-JST Document 37 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3354178 

- 1 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY 

PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOR OF ARBITRATION (Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST)

Plaintiff Jacob Sabatino (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, 

LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Rasier-DC, LLC, and Rasier-PA, LLC (“Defendants”), by and through 

their undersigned counsel, enter into the following stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 and 

subject to the Court’s approval for an order granting Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings 

Pending Arbitration and vacating the pending hearing date and case management conference 

accordingly. In support of this stipulation, the Parties state as follows: 

WHEREAS, on January 26, 2015, Plaintiff filed his putative class action complaint against 

Defendant (Dkt. No. 1); 

WHEREAS, on March 23, 2015, Defendants filed their Motion to Stay Proceedings 

Pending Arbitration (the “Motion”) on the basis that Plaintiff agreed to arbitrate pursuant to the 

Terms and Conditions that Plaintiff assented to as part of the Uber registration process (Dkt. No. 

27); 

WHEREAS, on April 22, 2015 Plaintiff filed a Notice of Non-opposition to the Motion 

(Dkt. No. 35); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff does not dispute that this matter should be stayed pending 

arbitration; 

WHEREAS, a hearing on the Motion is scheduled for June 11, 2015 (Dkt. No. 34); 

WHEREAS, a case management conference is scheduled for June 26, 2015 (Dkt. No. 31); 

WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the Parties stipulate and agree that the Court should 

grant Defendants’ Motion; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY 

STIPULATED by and between the Parties that, subject to Court approval, Defendants’ Motion to 

Stay Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration be granted, and the pending hearing on the Motion and 

case management conference be vacated. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

July 22 34

Case 3:15-cv-00363-JST Document 37 Filed 05/29/15 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3354178 

- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY 

PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOR OF ARBITRATION (Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST)

Dated: May 27, 2015 IRELL & MANELLA LLP 

By: /s/ A. Matthew Ashley 

Andra B. Greene 

A. Matthew Ashley 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: May 27, 2015 MLG AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, APLC 

By: /s/ Kathryn Harvey 

Kathryn Harvey 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 

Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration is granted. The hearing on 

Defendants’ motion and the case management conference are vacated. 

Dated: ________________________ 

 Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

 United States District Judge 

 

May 29, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:15-cv-00363-JST Document 37 Filed 05/29/15 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3354178 

- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY 

PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOR OF ARBITRATION (Case No. 3:15-cv-00363-JST)

ECF ATTESTATION

I, Michael D. Harbour, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION AND VACATING HEARING AND 

CONFERENCE DATES. I hereby attest that I received authorization to insert the signatures 

indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 

 By: /s/ Michael D. Harbour 

 

 Michael D. Harbour 

Case 3:15-cv-00363-JST Document 37 Filed 05/29/15 Page 4 of 4