Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05923/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05923-55/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VERONICA GUTIERREZ, ERIN

WALKER, and WILLIAM SMITH, as

individuals and on behalf of all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant. /

No. C 07-05923 WHA

CLASS ACTION

ORDER REGARDING

“NOTICE” OF POTENTIAL

JURISDICTIONAL DEFECT

A few weeks ago, Wells Fargo filed a “notice of potential jurisdictional defect” (Dkt.

No. 465). Plaintiffs responded (Dkt. No. 471). Wells Fargo is ORDERED to file a statement as

to whether or not it asserts that this Court has subject-matter jurisdiction. Please file this

statement by NOON ON MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 2010. The bank must advise one way or the other

and may not simply repeat its “notice” to the Court of a recent out-of-circuit decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 5, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-05923-WHA Document 474 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 1