Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235-174/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C 09-5235-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING SUPERSEDEAS BOND 

AND STAYING ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT 

BLAIR M. JACOBS (admitted pro hac vice) 

blairjacobs@paulhastings.com 

CHRISTINA A. ONDRICK (admitted pro hac vice) 

christinaondrick@paulhastings.com 

PATRICK J. STAFFORD (admitted pro hac vice) 

patrickstafford@paulhastings.com 

PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

875 15th Street NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

Telephone: (202) 551-1700 

YAR R. CHAIKOVSKY (SBN: 175421) 

yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com 

PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

1117 S. California Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 320-1800 

Attorneys for Defendants FAIRCHILD 

SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, 

and FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD 

SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and 

FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 09-5235-MMC 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING 

SUPERSEDEAS BOND AND STAYING 

ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT 

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 1069 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C 09-5235-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING SUPERSEDEAS BOND 

AND STAYING ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Now before the Court is Defendants’ Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., 

Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation (collectively 

“Fairchild”) Unopposed Motion for Approval of Supersedeas Bond and Stay of Enforcement of 

Judgment. 

Having considered Fairchild’s Motion, and any arguments or submissions related thereto, 

the Court hereby GRANTS Fairchild’s Motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the supersedeas bond is approved and that any proceedings 

to enforce any portions of the judgment are stayed pending appeal of the instant action. 

Dated: June____, 2017 

Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Judge 

22

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 1069 Filed 06/22/17 Page 2 of 2