Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00551/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00551-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 120
Nature of Suit: Marine Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 46:31343 Commercial Instruments &amp; Maritime Liens

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELECTRA YACHT OF NEWPORT, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 17cv551

ORDER AUTHORIZING ARREST OF

DEFENDANT VESSEL AND

APPOINTING SUBSTITUTE

CUSTODIAN

vs.

S/V MOUSETRAP, Cayman Islands

Official No. 743804, a JFA Chantier

Navala Sailing Vessel of Approximately

33.5 Meters in Length,

AND ALL OF HER ENGINES, TACKLE,

ACCESSORIES, EQUIPMENT,

FURNISHINGS, AND

APPURTENANCES, in rem,

Defendants.

Electra Yacht’s David Maguire filed an action against the S/V Mousetrap for breach

of a maritime contract. Maguire says the Mousetrap’s owners owe him about $200,000 for

services he’s provided since last summer. Maguire filed ex parte motions requesting the

Court order (i) a warrant for the arrest of the Mousetrap; and (ii) an order appointing Driscoll

Boat Works as custodian.

I. Motion for arrest warrant

The Court must first “review the complaint and any supporting papers” to determine

if “the conditions for an in rem action appear to exist.” Fed. R. Civ. P. Supp. Admiralty

Rule C. “An action in rem may be brought” to “enforce any maritime liens.” Id. Specifically,

- 1 -

Case 3:17-cv-00551-LAB-JLB Document 5 Filed 03/24/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

a “person providing necessaries to a vessel on the order of the owner or a person authorized

by the owner” “has a maritime lien on the vessel” and “may bring a civil action in rem to

enforce the lien.” 46 U.S.C. § 31342. The term necessaries includes repairs. Id. § 3130. And

courts have interpreted the term broadly to include “any item which is reasonably needed for

the venture in which the ship is engaged.” Foss Launch & Tug Co. v. Char Ching Shipping

U.S.A., Ltd., 808 F.2d 697, 699 (9th Cir. 1987). The complaint must also be verified,

describe the property with reasonable particularity, and state that the property is within the

district. Fed. R. Civ. P. Supp. Admiralty Rule C.

Maguire says that he provided work on the Mousetrap at the request of the Captain

and Engineer based on an oral agreement in June 2015. He received payment for about a

year, but since last summer, he hasn’t been paid for a myriad of repairs. Maguire says all of

the unpaid work was inspected and approved by the Captain or Engineer. He’s attached the

relevant unpaid invoices. Maguire’s complaint is verified, describes the ship with particularity,

and states that the Mousetrap is docked within the district. 

The Court finds an in rem action to enforce a maritime lien appears to exist.

Therefore, the Court "must issue an order directing the clerk to issue a warrant for the arrest

of the vessel.” Id. The Court GRANTS the motion (Dkt. 2) and issues the following orders: 

1. The Court orders the Clerk to prepare a warrant for the arrest of the Defendant vessel

S/V Mousetrap and all of her furnishings as described in the caption. The Clerk shall

deliver the warrant to the U.S. Marshal for the Southern District for service. 

2. Electra Yacht must comply with the notice provisions as outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P.

Supp. Admiralty Rule C(4) and Local Civ. R. C.1(b). Any person with an interest in the

Mousetrap is entitled to a prompt hearing upon request. At the hearing, Electra Yacht

needs to show probable cause for the issuance of the warrant. Fed. R. Civ. P. Supp.

Admiralty Rule E.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

- 2 -

Case 3:17-cv-00551-LAB-JLB Document 5 Filed 03/24/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

II. Substitution of Custodian

Electra Yacht also moved for the appointment of a substitute custodian. The Court

may “order that custody of the vessel be given to the operator of a marina” if the Court finds

they can “safely keep the vessel and has in effect adequate insurance.” Local Civ. Rule E.1.

The Court finds that Driscoll Boat Works satisfies the local rule and GRANTS the motion to

appoint Driscoll as substitute custodian authorized to move the vessel (Dkt. 3). The Court

issues the following orders:

1. Driscoll Boat Works is appointed as substitute custodian of the S/V Mousetrap.

Driscoll’s Michael Benedict is authorized to accept custodianship. Driscoll may move

the vessel to any suitable and safe location within its boatyard for safekeeping as

discussed in § 6.

2. The U.S. Marshal shall surrender the Mousetrap to Driscoll and the Marshal shall be

discharged and not liable for any claims arising out of surrendering the vessel to

Driscoll. 

3. Driscoll shall assume custody of the Mousetrap and arrange to tow it from The Marine

Group’s boatyard at 997 G Street in Chula Vista to Driscoll Boat Works at 2500

Shelter Island Drive in San Diego, and maintain her there until further order of the

Court.

4. Electra Yacht assumes the responsibility for safekeeping of the Mousetrap.

5. Driscoll must not sell the Mousetrap. Driscoll must not release the vessel or allow

anyone aboard except in an emergency.

6. Driscoll shall provide the following services for the safekeeping of the Mousetrap at

a cost not to exceed the prevailing rates of the port: 

• As soon as possible after assuming custody of the Mousetrap, Driscoll must

photograph or video tape her interior and exterior.

• Provide vessel monitoring services. Periodically inspect mooring lines and

fenders to assure safe mooring. Periodically inspect the vessel for watertight

integrity, excessive bilge water, and fuel lubricant leaks.

- 3 -

Case 3:17-cv-00551-LAB-JLB Document 5 Filed 03/24/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

• Provide wharfage services and electricity if necessary.

7. If Driscoll thinks further action is necessary for safekeeping beyond the instructions

in this order, Driscoll shall notify Electra Yacht's attorney so counsel can seek an

appropriate order from the Court.

This order must be served with the warrant for arrest. Electra Yacht’s attorney must

immediately serve the Mousetrap’s owners, agents, and any others that may have an

interest in the Mousetrap, by mail, and, email if possible.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 23, 2017

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge

- 4 -

Case 3:17-cv-00551-LAB-JLB Document 5 Filed 03/24/17 PageID.<pageID> Page 4 of 4