Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_04-cv-01861/USCOURTS-azd-3_04-cv-01861-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sean Patrick Murphy, a single man, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

County of Yavapai, Board of

Supervisors, Gheral Brownlow, Lorna

Street, and Chip Davis, a body politic;

G.C. “Buck” Buchanan, Sheriff of

Yavapai County; and Danell Johnson, a

single man,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-04-1861-PCT-DGC

ORDER

Pending before the Court is pro se Defendant Danial Johnson’s “motion to respond

on complaint.” Doc. #32. Defendant states at the outset of his motion that he int ends to

answer the complaint, but needs more information to do so. Id. at 1. Defendant further

states that his first name is Danial, not Dannell, and that he has never assaulted Plaintiff.

Id. at 2. Defendant concludes by moving the Court to dismiss him from this action. Id.

In an order dated November 4, 2005, the Court construed the motion as a motion to

dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. #53 at 1

(citing Bernhardt v. L.A. County, 339 F.3d 920, 925 (9th Cir. 2003)). The Court gave Plaintiff

until November 18, 2005 to file a response to the motion. Id. at 2. The Court warned

Plaintiff it may deem his failure to respond a consent to the granting of the motion. Id.

(citing LRCiv 7.2(i); Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995); Ferdik v . Bonzelet,

Case 3:04-cv-01861-DGC Document 56 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.1992)). To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response. The Court

will accordingly grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss. 

IT IS O RDERED that Defendant Danial Johnson’s motion to dismiss (Doc. #32) is

granted.

DATED this 28th day of November, 2005.

Case 3:04-cv-01861-DGC Document 56 Filed 11/28/05 Page 2 of 2