Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-01683/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-01683-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mohammed Khalafala-Khalafala, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

United States of America, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-12-01683-PHX-ROS

ORDER

On December 7, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Mark Aspey issued a Report

and Recommendation. (Doc. 5). Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and

Recommendation.

A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has

filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district

court's review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v.

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d

1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo

review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.”)

(internal quotations and citations omitted).

No objections being made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in

full.

Case 2:12-cv-01683-ROS Document 7 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, the Clerk of the Court shall dismiss this action without prejudice.

DATED this 7th day of January, 2013.

Case 2:12-cv-01683-ROS Document 7 Filed 01/07/13 Page 2 of 2