Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_09-cv-00798/USCOURTS-ared-4_09-cv-00798-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Other Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

LITTLE ROCK DIVISION

BOBBY ISOM PLAINTIFF

 

vs. 4:09-cv-00798-GTE 

CITY OF CABOT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS

ORDER Re: General Order 541

Pending is an oral request for Order Re: General Order No. 54 filed by the Defendant. The

request is GRANTED. All lawyers and staff affiliated with this case are authorized to bring cell

phones, laptop computers, or personal digital assistants into the courthouse, subject to the following

rules:

(a) The devices mentioned above may not be used to record, photograph, or film anyone

or anything inside the courthouse.

(b) Cell phones must be turned off and put away when in the courtroom.

(c) Wireless internet components of electronic devices must be deactivated when in

district courtrooms.

(d) Before persons with electronic devices are granted entry into the Courthouse, all

devices must be examined by the United States Marshals Service or Court Security

Personnel. This examination includes, but is not limited to placing the device

through electronic screening machines and requiring the person possessing the

device to turn the power to the device off and on.

(e) The United States Marshals Service may further restrict electronic devices from

entering the building should a threat assessment so dictate.

A violation of paragraph (a), (b), or (c) may result in seizure of the electronic device,

withdrawal of the privilege to bring an electronic device into the courthouse, or other sanctions. A 

1

Adopted in the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Case 4:09-cv-00798-GTE Document 22 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 2
violation of the prohibition on recording, photographing, or filming anyone or anything inside the

courthouse may be punished as contempt of court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of July, 2010.

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:09-cv-00798-GTE Document 22 Filed 07/13/10 Page 2 of 2