Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01442/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01442-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 08cv1442 BTM (CAB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENEDINO DURAN GOMEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 08cv1442 BTM (CAB)

ORDER RE SUR-REPLY

v.

ROSSI CONCRETE, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Defendants have filed an objection to Plaintiffs’ reply brief, arguing that it presents new

arguments and evidence not presented in Plaintiffs’ original motion. Defendants ask the

Court to strike the new material or for leave to file a sur-reply. The Court grants Defendants

leave to file a sur-reply. Defendants may file one fifteen-page brief, and it must be filed by

July 16, 2010. Defendants may not raise additional issues not raised by Plaintiffs’ reply brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 1, 2010

Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-01442-KSC Document 73 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 1