Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01527/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01527-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

[TCDOC:2672-13-325142.1] CIV. S-02-1527 DAD 

STIPULATION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HANCOCK ROTHERT &

BUNSHOFT LLP 

P.O. BOX 7199 

TAHOE CITY, CA 96145 

(530) 583-7767

JOHN E. FAGAN, ESQ. (SBN: 107974) 

JILL HALEY PENWARDEN, ESQ. (SBN: 178561) 

MICHAEL L. REITZELL, ESQ. (SBN: 215272) 

HANCOCK ROTHERT & BUNSHOFT LLP 

The Lighthouse Center 

850 North Lake Boulevard, Suite 15 

Post Office Box 7199 

Tahoe City, California 96145-7199 

Telephone: (530) 583-7767 

Facsimile: (530) 581-3215 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SQUAW VALLEY SKI CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MATTHEW P. PAXTON, KRIS MILLER 

PAXTON, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SQUAW VALLEY SKI CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No. CIV. S-02-1527 DAD 

STIPULATION TO STAY 

ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT 

Action Filed: July 12, 2002 

Trial Date: May 9, 2005 

Judgment Entered: May 26, 2005 

 

Plaintiffs Matthew P. Paxton and Kris Miller Paxton and Defendant Squaw Valley 

Ski Corporation, through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 

1. The district court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiffs on May 26, 2005. 

2. Plaintiff may not enforce the judgment until June 10, 2005. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 

62(b); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) [excluding weekends and holidays from a 10-day period].) 

3. Defendant intends to file one or more motions under Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure 50(b), 59, and/or 60, on or before June 10, 2005. 

4. The district court “may stay the execution of or any proceedings to enforce 

a judgment pending the disposition of a motion for a new trial or to alter or amend a judgment 

made pursuant to Rule 59, or of a motion for relief from a judgment or order made pursuant to 

Rule 60, or of a motion for judgment in accordance with a motion for a directed verdict made 

Case 2:02-cv-01527-DAD Document 129 Filed 06/10/05 Page 1 of 2
[TCDOC:2672-13-325142.1] CIV. S-02-1527 DAD 

STIPULATION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HANCOCK ROTHERT &

BUNSHOFT LLP 

P.O. BOX 7199 

TAHOE CITY, CA 96145 

(530) 583-7767

pursuant to Rule 50 . . . .” (Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(b).) 

5. The parties agree that Plaintiff will neither enforce nor institute proceedings 

to enforce the judgment until 10 days after the district court enters an order finally resolving all 

post-trial motions described in paragraph 3 above. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 

DATED: June 3, 2005 HANCOCK ROTHERT & BUNSHOFT LLP 

By: /s/ 

Michael L. Reitzell 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 SQUAW VALLEY SKI CORPORATION 

DATED: June __, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE S. OSTERMAN 

By: /s/ 

Bruce S. Osterman 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

MATTHEW P. PAXTON AND KRIS 

MILLER PAXTON 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(b) and the above stipulation of the 

parties, the district court hereby stays execution of, or any proceedings to enforce, the judgment 

until 10 days after entry of an order finally resolving all motions described in paragraph 3. 

Dated: June 9, 2005

Ddad1/orders.consent/paxton1527.stipord.stayjudg 

Case 2:02-cv-01527-DAD Document 129 Filed 06/10/05 Page 2 of 2