Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-md-02672/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-md-02672-146/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 15:2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

---

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN 

MA

PR

___

Th

AL

___

pen

Ne

163

Ve

the

mo

200

mo

inc

Ab

wit

mo

Da

RE: VOLK

ARKETING

RODUCTS L

__________

is Order Rel

LL ACTION

__________

In its Pr

nding further

ew Mexico, b

33.) After th

ermont, Okla

eir respective

ove to reman

02, 2156, 22

otions brough

The sta

cluding those

bsent further 

th Civil Loca

otions as set 

IT IS S

ated: January

SWAGEN “

G, SALES PR

LIABILITY 

___________

lates To: 

NS (except th

___________

retrial Order

r order of th

by and throu

he order, var

ahoma, Tenn

e Attorneys G

nd their cases

242, 2267, 24

ht by the Att

ay is lifted as

e identified a

order from t

al Rules 7-2 

forth in Pret

SO ORDER

y 5, 2016 

UNITED

NORTHER

“CLEAN DI

RACTICES,

LITIGATIO

__________

he securities 

__________

r No. 22, the

e Court. (D

ugh its Attorn

rious States—

nessee, New 

General filed

s back to the

443, 2445, 2

torney Gene

s to any State

above. The 

the Court, th

and 7-3. Th

trial Order N

RED.

D STATES D

RN DISTRIC

IESEL” 

 AND 

ON 

_______/ 

action) 

________/ 

e Court previ

kt. No. 1643

ney General

—New York

Hampshire, 

d notices and

eir respective

2599, 2627.)

ral of their r

e remand mo

opening brie

he briefing an

his order doe

No. 22. 

DISTRICT C

CT OF CALI

MDL No.

ORDER 

BY ANY 

iously ordere

3.) Prior to t

, had filed a 

k, Pennsylvan

Alabama, O

d motions in

e State court

 As to these

respective St

otions broug

efs shall be f

and hearing s

es not affect

CH

Un

COURT 

IFORNIA 

. 2672 CRB 

RE: MOTI

STATE 

ed a stay of 

the issuance 

motion to re

nia, Massach

Ohio, and Mi

ndicating tha

ts. (Dkt. No

e and any oth

tate, the Cou

ght by State A

filed on or b

schedule sha

t the stay as t

HARLES R.

nited States D

 (JSC) 

ONS TO RE

all remand m

of that orde

emand. (Dk

husetts, Mar

issouri—by 

at they also in

os. 1995, 199

her State rem

urt ORDERS

Attorneys G

efore Januar

all be set in a

to any other 

 BREYER 

District Judg

EMAND 

motions 

er, one State,

kt. No. 

ryland, 

and through

ntend to 

96, 2001, 

mand 

S as follows:

General, 

ry 31, 2017. 

accordance 

remand 

ge 

h

Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 2640 Filed 01/05/17 Page 1 of 1