Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01274/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-01274-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dimitri Storm seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights related to calls 

and use of his tablet on October 17, 2024. (See generally Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge ordered 

Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust his administrative 

remedies (Doc. 8), and Plaintiff failed to respond to the order. Accordingly, the magistrate judge issued 

Findings and Recommendations, finding from the face of the complaint that it was apparent Plaintiff 

did not exhaust available administrative remedies and recommending the action be dismissed without 

prejudice. (Doc. 10.)

The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any 

objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 10 at 3.) The Court advised Plaintiff that the “failure to file 

objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the ‘right to challenge the magistrate’s 

factual findings’ on appeal.” (Id. at 4, quoting Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 

2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so expired.

DIMITRI Z. STORM,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CSATF WARDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:24-cv-1274 JLT BAM

ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 

ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE 

TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES, 

AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO 

CLOSE THIS CASE

(Doc. 10)

Case 1:24-cv-01274-JLT-BAM Document 11 Filed 01/03/25 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. 

Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are 

supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. The Findings and Recommendations dated December 3, 2024 (Doc. 10) are 

ADOPTED in full.

2. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative 

remedies.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2025 

Case 1:24-cv-01274-JLT-BAM Document 11 Filed 01/03/25 Page 2 of 2