Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01374/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01374-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jarrel Shakir, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-1374-PHX-ROS

ORDER

On September 17, 2009, Magistrate Judge Hector C. Estrada issued a Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the request for a writ of habeas corpus be

denied. (Doc. 22). Normally, objections to an R&R must be filed within ten days, but

Petitioner obtained additional time in which to file objections. (Doc. 25, 27). Petitioner was

given until December 16, 2009 (three months after issuance of the R&R) to file his

objections. Petitioner did not file any objections.

A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 USC § 636(b). Where any party has

filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendations, the district

court’s review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are

filed, the district court need not conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp.

2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo

Case 2:07-cv-01374-ROS Document 28 Filed 01/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.”)

(internal quotations and citations omitted). Petitioner did not file any objections and the

R&R will be adopted in full.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED. The

request for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk shall close this case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Petitioner

has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

DATED this 5th day of January, 2010.

Case 2:07-cv-01374-ROS Document 28 Filed 01/06/10 Page 2 of 2