Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03758/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03758-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1402 Medical Malpractice

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE, a

District of Columbia Nonprofit

Organization; and VETERANS UNITED

FOR TRUTH, INC., a California

Nonprofit Organization,

representing their members and a

class of all veterans similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of

Department of Veterans Affairs;

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

VETERANS AFFAIRS; JAMES P. TERRY,

Chairman, Board of Veterans

Appeals; DANIEL L. COOPER, Under

Secretary, Veterans Benefits

Administration; BRADLEY G. MAYES,

Director, Compensation and Pension

Service; DR. MICHAEL J. KUSSMAN,

Under Secretary, Veterans Health

Administration; PRITZ K. NAVARA,

Veterans Service Center Manager,

Oakland Regional Office, Department

of Veterans Affairs; UNITED STATES

OF AMERICA; ALBERTO GONZALES,

Attorney General of the United

States; and WILLIAM P GREENE, JR.,

Chief Judge of the United States

Court of Appeals for Veterans

Claims,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-07-3758 SC

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO

ENLARGE TIME

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to

Enlarge Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss ("Motion

Case 3:07-cv-03758-SC Document 27 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -2-

to Enlarge Time") and Defendants' Response. See Docket Nos. 21,

24. 

Plaintiffs seek additional time to oppose Defendants' Motion

to Dismiss due to the numerous and complex legal issues it raises. 

See Mot. to Enlarge Time at 3. Defendants seek additional time to

file a Reply as well as an order barring Plaintiffs from filing a

Motion for a Preliminary Injunction prior to the hearing for the

Motion to Dismiss. 

The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion to Enlarge Time. 

Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition no later than November 9,

2007, at 4:00 p.m. Defendants shall file any Reply by November

30, 2007, at 4:00 p.m. The hearing for Defendants' Motion to

Dismiss, which was scheduled for Friday, November 2, 2007, is

hereby moved to Friday, December 14, 2007, at 10:00 a.m.

Defendants' request to preclude Plaintiffs from filing a

Motion for a Preliminary Injunction before the hearing date for

the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 3, 2007

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-03758-SC Document 27 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 2