Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05340/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-05340-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 03-05340 JF (RS)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES 

(JFLC1)

** E-filed on 6/23/06 **

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GOOGLE INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER

FACTORY, INC., et al.,

 Defendants.

Case Number C 03-05340 JF (RS)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT

DEADLINES

[re: docket no. 109]

AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER

FACTORY, INC.,

 Counterclaimant,

 v.

GOOGLE INC.,

 Counter-Defendant.

American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. (“American Blind”) moves to amend and

extend the case management dates by ninety (90) days. Google Inc. (“Google”) opposes the

motion. The Court heard oral argument on June 23, 2006. 

Considering the fact that American Blind underwent a change of ownership and

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 133 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 03-05340 JF (RS)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES 

(JFLC1)

management between April, 2006 and June, 2006, the Court concludes that an extension of the

case management dates is appropriate. See Declaration of Susan Greenspon in Support of

American Blind & Wallpaper, Factory Inc.’s Reply in Support of Motion to Amend and Extend

Case Management Order Dates. However, considering, among other things, that the instant

action was filed more than two and a half years ago and that American Blind has previously

sought and received an extension of case management dates, the Court will amend and extend the

case management dates by only sixty (60) days.

As the Court indicated to counsel during oral argument, the extension of case

management dates is intended only to allow the parties to complete discovery that is within the

previously established scope of discovery. If during the remaining period of discovery a party

believes that additional discovery is necessary, the parties should attempt resolve the matter

between themselves. However, if an agreement cannot be reached, permission to conduct

additional discovery shall be sought from Magistrate Judge Seeborg.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 23, 2006

 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 133 Filed 06/23/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case No. C 03-05340 JF (RS)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES 

(JFLC1)

This Order has been served upon the following persons:

Ethan B. Andelman andelmane@howrey.com, cranmerp@howrey.com

Ravind Singh Grewal rsg@kvn.com

Klaus Hemingway Hamm khamm@kvn.com, efiling@kvn.com; wik@kvn.com

Ajay Krishnan akrishnan@kvn.com, efiling@kvn.com; rthomas@kvn.com

Michael H. Page mhp@kvn.com, efiling@kvn.com; sjr@kvn.com; nsn@kvn.com

Robert Nathan Phillips phillipsr@howrey.com, cranmerp@howrey.com

Stephen E. Taylor staylor@tcolaw.com, jklohonatz@tcolaw.com;

swexler@tcolaw.com; tnewby@tcolaw.com; jliu@tcolaw.com;

cdunbar@tcolaw.com; nfreese@tcolaw.com;

rleffkich@tcolaw.com; gfrary@tcolaw.com

Mark A. Lemley

Keker & Van Nest, LLP

710 Samsome Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704

Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 133 Filed 06/23/06 Page 3 of 3