Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-03261/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-03261-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S CASE NO. 07-03261 (EMC) 

TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

S. ASHLIE BERINGER (applying pro hac vice) 

1801 California Street, Suite 4200 

Denver, CO 80202-2642 

Phone: (303) 298-5700 

Fax: (303) 296-5310 

aberinger@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

MICHAEL B. SMITH, SBN 235764 

1881 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Phone: (650) 849-5338 

Fax: (650) 849-5038 

msmith@gibsondunn.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

VALUECLICK, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ASIS INTERNET SERVICES, a California 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

VALUECLICK, INC., dba VC E-COMMERCE 

SOLUTIONS, INC., also dba 

CONSUMERINCENTIVEZONE.COM, also dba 

PROMOTIONSGATEWAY.COM, also dba 

GENEROUSGENIE.COM, also dba 

REWARDSGATEWAY.COM, also dba 

CONSUMERPROMOTIONCENTER.COM, 

also dba REWARDAMAZON.COM, also dba 

GIVEAWAYCAFE.COM and DOES ONE 

through FIFTY, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 07-03261 (EMC) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, Plaintiff ASIS INTERNET SERVICES (the "Plaintiff") served the Complaint in 

this action on Defendant VALUECLICK, INC. (the "Defendant") on July 9, 2007; 

Case 4:07-cv-03261-PJH Document 5 Filed 08/02/07 Page 1 of 3
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S CASE NO. 07-03261 (EMC) 

TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

WHEREAS, absent an extension of time, the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise 

respond to the Complaint is July 30, 2007; 

WHEREAS, there have been no prior stipulations or requests for extension of time to respond 

to the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant recently was retained to represent Defendant in this 

action, and Defendant requires additional time to prepare its response to the Complaint; and 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise 

respond to the Complaint by thirty (30) days beyond the time limits specified in the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure; 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

Defendant VALUECLICK, INC. shall have until August 29, 2007 to answer or otherwise 

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

DATED: July 25, 2007 SINGLETON LAW GROUP 

By: /s/ 

Jason K. Singleton 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

DATED: July 25, 2007 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By: /s/ 

Michael B. Smith 

Counsel for Defendant 

Case 4:07-cv-03261-PJH Document 5 Filed 08/02/07 Page 2 of 3
3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S CASE NO. 07-03261 (EMC) 

TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED 

 AND SO ORDERED.. 

Dated: __________________, 2007. 

 

United States Magistrate Judge 

August 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 4:07-cv-03261-PJH Document 5 Filed 08/02/07 Page 3 of 3