Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02539/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02539-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG ORDER 

FRANK BUSCH (258288)

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 

101 Mission Street, 18th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1727 

Telephone: (415) 371-8500 

Fax: (415) 371-0500 

Email: busch@kerrwagstaffe.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

METRA COMPUTER GROUP FZCO and 

T&H COMPUTERS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

MOCHA MILL, INC., MONK OF MOCHA 

SPECIALTY COFFEE PRODUCTION AND 

EXPORT, INC., IBRAHIM A. ALAELI, 

YASIR H. KHANSHALI, and ADNAN G. 

AWNALLAH, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

PORT OF MOKHA, INC., PORT OF MOKHA 

LLC, MOKHA FOUNATION, BLUE BOTTLE 

COFFEE, INC., METRA COMPUTER 

GROUP FZCO, T&H COMPUTERS, INC., 

MOKHTAR F. ALKHANSHALI, and 

IBRAHIM AHMAD IBRAHIM, 

Defendants. 

 

Case No. 4:18-CV-02539-HSG 

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR 

RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT UNDER CIVIL LOCAL 

RULE 6-1, AND FOR BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS 

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Case 4:18-cv-02539-HSG Document 31 Filed 06/26/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

C

P

(c

al

R

D

fo

2

or

th

2

un

in

D

ase No. 4:18-C

On Ju

roduction an

collectively, 

ll collectivel

Respond to th

Dismiss. Thi

ollows: 

1. 

7, 2018, whi

rder; 

2. 

he Parties ag

7, 2018, at 2

3. 

nder Rule 12

nsufficient se

IT IS 

Dated: June 2

CV-02539-HSG

une 22, 2018

nd Export, In

the “Plaintif

ly, the “Parti

he Complain

is Court, hav

The deadli

ich will not a

In the even

gree that the 

(a) the mo

(b) any op

(c) any rep

(d) The mo

2:00 p.m., or

This stipul

2, including 

ervice of pro

SO ORDER

26, 2018 

 

 

G 

, Plaintiffs M

nc., Ibrahim 

ffs”), and De

ies”) filed a 

nt under Civi

ving reviewe

ine for Defen

alter the date

nt that Defen

motion shall

tion shall be

pposition sha

ply shall be f

otion shall b

r such date th

lation does n

without lim

ocess, and fa

RED. 

1

ORD

Mocha Mill, 

A. Alaeli, Y

efendant Me

Stipulation t

il Local Rule

ed the stipula

ndant to ans

e of any othe

ndant respon

l be briefed 

e filed on or 

all be filed on

filed on or b

be set on the 

hereafter con

not waive De

itation the d

ailure to state

 ____

 HON

 UNIT

1

DER

Inc., Monk 

Yasir H. Kha

etra Comput

to Extend Ti

e 6-1, and fo

ation, adopts

swer or respo

er event or d

nds to the Co

as follows: 

before July 

n or before A

efore Septem

Court’s cale

nducive to th

efendant’s ri

defenses of la

e a claim upo

__________

NORABLE HA

TED STATES 

of Mocha Sp

anshali, and A

er Group FZ

ime for Defe

or Briefing S

s the Parties’

ond to the Co

deadline alre

omplaint by 

27, 2018; 

August 27, 2

mber 10, 201

endar for arg

he Court’s sc

ight to prese

ack of person

on which rel

___________

AYWOOD S. G

DISTRICT C

pecialty Cof

Adnan G. A

ZCO (“Defen

endants to A

Schedule on 

’ proposed sc

omplaint sha

eady fixed by

filing a Rule

2018; 

18. 

gument on S

chedule. 

ent all defens

nal jurisdicti

lief can be g

__________

GILLIAM, JR.

OURT

ORDER

ffee 

Awnallah 

ndant,” and 

Answer or 

Motion to 

chedule as 

all be July 

y court 

e 12 motion,

eptember 

ses available

ion, 

granted. 

________ 

R

,

e

Case 4:18-cv-02539-HSG Document 31 Filed 06/26/18 Page 2 of 2