Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01830/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01830-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 PARTIES’ [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case No.: C 04-01830 CRB (JL) 

1-PA/3592866.1 

1

DAVID C. BOHRER (SBN 212397) 

dbohrer@morganlewis.com 

MICHAEL J. LYONS (SBN 202284) 

mlyons@morganlewis.com 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

Two Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700 

Palo Alto, CA 94306 

Telephone: (650) 843-4000 

Facsimile: (650) 843-4001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD. 

DANIEL M. PRESS, ESQ. 

dpress@chung-press.com 

JUAN CHARDIET, ESQ. 

jchardiet@chung-press.com 

CHUNG & PRESS, P.C. 

6723 Whittier Ave., Suite 302 

McLean, VA 22101 

Telephone: (703) 734-3800 

Facsimile: (703) 734-0590 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

DAEWOO ELECTRONICS, et al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DAEWOO ELECTRONICS 

CORPORATION, et al. 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 04-01830 CRB (JL) 

PARTIES’ [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / /

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 255 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 4
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 PARTIES’ [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case No.: C 04-01830 CRB (JL) 

1-PA/3592866.1 

2

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff Funai Electric Company, Ltd. (“Funai”) and Defendants 

Daewoo Electronics Corporation (“DEC”) and Daewoo Electronics America, Inc. (“DEAM”) 

(collectively, “the Parties”) attended a case management conference with the Court on June 9, 

2006; 

WHEREAS, the Court set the dates for the Final Pretrial Conference and the Trial, and 

ordered the Parties to negotiate the remaining dates; 

THEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request the Court to approve and adopt the case 

management schedule set forth below: 

Action Date/Deadline 

Supplementation of disclosures and responses under 

Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(e) 

July 21, 2006 

Written expert reports for those issues upon which each 

party bears the burden of proof 

January 9, 2007 

Rebuttal expert reports March 9, 2007 

Fact and expert discovery cut-off March 30, 2007 

Dispositive motions April 27, 2007 

Deadline to serve (but not file) motions in Limine (5 or 

fewer per side, without leave) 

May 30, 2007 

(at least 20 days before pretrial 

conference)*

Deadline to serve (but not file) oppositions to any motions 

in Limine

June 8, 2007 

(at least 10 days before pretrial 

conference)*

Joint Proposed Pretrial Order, Motions in Limine (moving 

party files both motion and opposition), lists of witnesses 

and objections pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(3) and other 

items pursuant to Judge Breyer’s Guidelines for Trial and 

Final Pretrial Conference in Civil Jury Cases 

June 12, 2007 

(at least 7 days before pretrial 

conference)*

Final Pretrial Conference June 19, 2007, 2.30 p.m.**

Trial July 2, 2007, 8.30 a.m.** 

 

*

 Pursuant to Judge Breyer’s “Guidelines for Trial and Pretrial Conference in Civil Jury Cases.” ** Pursuant to Court’s Order dated June 9, 2006. 

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 255 Filed 07/05/06 Page 2 of 4
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 PARTIES’ [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case No.: C 04-01830 CRB (JL) 

1-PA/3592866.1 

3

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: June 28, 2006 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

By: /s/ David C. Bohrer_________

David C. Bohrer 

Michael J. Lyons 

Dated: June 28, 2006 CHUNG & PRESS, P.C. 

By: /s/ Daniel M. Press_________

Daniel M. Press 

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 255 Filed 07/05/06 Page 3 of 4
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 PARTIES’ [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case No.: C 04-01830 CRB (JL) 

1-PA/3592866.1 

4

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I, David C. Bohrer, 

attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 

signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that 

the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed this June 28, 2006, at Palo Alto. 

/s/ David C. Bohrer_____

David C. Bohrer 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________ _________________________________________ 

 CHARLES R. BREYER 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

July 05, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-01830-JCS Document 255 Filed 07/05/06 Page 4 of 4