Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07592/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07592-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENIKO PRAKASH,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PULSENT CORPORATION,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-7592 SC (BZ)

THIRD DISCOVERY ORDER

Following a telephone conference at which both sides were

represented by counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s application for an order shortening time

is GRANTED to the extent that plaintiff’s motion will be heard

on an expedited schedule.

2. The parties are instructed to make one final effort

to resolve this discovery dispute consistent with the views

expressed by the court.

3. If they are unable to do so, Sun Life’s opposition is

due January 4, 2008 by noon. 

4. If a reply or a hearing is necessary, the court will

Case 3:06-cv-07592-SC Document 54 Filed 12/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

issue a further order.

Dated: December 27, 2007

 Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\PRAKASH V. PULSENT\DISC3.ORDER.wpd

Case 3:06-cv-07592-SC Document 54 Filed 12/27/07 Page 2 of 2