Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01299/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01299-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAHN G. THOMPSON, 1:07-cv-01299-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

vs. (Doc. 31.)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ORDER FOR THIS ACTION TO PROCEED

ONLY ON CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANTS TUCKER, GREEN, LEE,

HERNANDEZ, RINCON, DEATHRIDGE,

HUCKABAY, THOMPSON, AND MELENDEZ,

AND DISMISSING ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS FOR FAILURE TO STATE

Defendants. A CLAIM

_____________________________/

Rahn G. Thompson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On April 19, 2011, Findings and Recommendations were entered, recommending that this

action proceed only on certain claims against defendants Tucker, Green, Lee, Hernandez, Rincon,

Deathridge, Huckabay, Thompson, and Melendez, and that all other claims and defendants be

dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim. (Doc. 31.) Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to

file objections to the Findings and Recommendations within thirty days. To date, Plaintiff has not

filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations, and on June 3, 2011, Plaintiff submitted

documents to enable service of process to proceed upon the defendants named above. (Doc. 33.)

1

Case 1:07-cv-01299-LJO-GSA Document 37 Filed 06/08/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this court

has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 19,

2011, are adopted in full;

2. This action now proceeds against defendant Tucker for subjecting Plaintiff to adverse

conditions of confinement; against defendants Tucker, Green, Lee, Rincon, Hernandez, Deathridge,

and Huckabay for failing to protect Plaintiff; against defendants Tucker, Green, and Huckabay for

retaliating against Plaintiff; and against defendants Tucker, Thompson, and Melendez for using

excessive force against Plaintiff;

3. All remaining claims and defendants are dismissed from this action based on

Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and

4. Defendants RN Ms. Davis, Med Tech Mr. Chapman, and H. Martinez are dismissed

from this action based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted

against them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 8, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:07-cv-01299-LJO-GSA Document 37 Filed 06/08/11 Page 2 of 2