Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-02905/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-02905-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case Nos. C05-02904 HRL and C05-02905 HRL 

2ND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING 

HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL 

DM_US:20947889_1

HOWREY LLP

KERSTIN ARUSHA, Bar No. 182624, kerstina@lawfoundation.org 

FAIR HOUSING LAW PROJECT 

KYRA KAZANTZIS, Bar No. 154612, kyrak@lawfoundation.org 

JAMES ZAHRADKA, Bar No. 196822, jamesz@lawfoundation.org 

PUBLIC INTEREST LAW FIRM 

LAW FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY

111 West Saint John Street, Suite 315 

San Jose, California 95113 

Telephone: (408) 280-2412 

Facsimile: (408) 293-0106 

DAVID A. MAKMAN, Bar No. 178195, MakmanD@Howrey.com 

MATTHEW GREINERT, Bar No. 239492, GreinertM@Howrey.com 

HOWREY LLP 

525 Market Street, Suite 3600 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 848-4900 

Facsimile: (415) 848-4999 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JUAN MEDINA, et al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

JUAN MEDINA, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

ARGENT MORTGAGE COMPANY, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C-05-02905 HRL 

SECOND STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

RESCHEDULING HEARING ON 

PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL

Related Case No. C05-02904 HRL 

*ORDER E-FILED 1/11/2008*

Case 5:05-cv-02905-HRL Document 171 Filed 01/11/08 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case Nos. C05-02904 HRL and C05-02905 HRL 

SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RESCHEDULING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO 

COMPEL

DM_US:20947889_1

HOWREY LLP

In order to allow additional time for settlement negotiations, Plaintiffs Maria Garibay, Yolanda 

Hidalgo, Joseph Hidalgo, Adalberto Reyes, Maria Reyes, Carlos Aparicio, Veronica Aparicio, 

Francisco Lopez, and Maria Carillo and Defendant BNC Mortgage, Inc. (“BNC”), by and through their 

counsel, agree and stipulate that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel, currently scheduled for hearing January 

29, 2008, should be re-scheduled as follows: 

BNC’s Opposition shall be due on Tuesday, January 22, 2008. 

Plaintiffs Reply shall be due on Tuesday, January 29, 2008. 

The hearing on the motion shall take place on Tuesday, February 5, 2008. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: January 10, 2008 HOWREY LLP 

 

By: /s/David A. Makman 

David A. Makman 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: January 10, 2008 MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP 

 

By: /s/Jami McKeon 

Jami McKeon 

Attorney for BNC 

 IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: _____________________ 

 

 HOWARD R. LLOYD 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

January 11, 2008

Case 5:05-cv-02905-HRL Document 171 Filed 01/11/08 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case Nos. C05-2094 HL and C05-02905 HL 

2ND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING 

HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL

-2- 

DM_US:20947889_1 

HOWREY LLP

CERTIFICATION BY DAVID A. MAKMAN PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE NO. 45, 

SECTION X. RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California, and am an attorney in 

the law firm of Howrey LLP, counsel for plaintiffs Juan Medina, et al.. The statements herein are made 

on my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness I could and would testify thereto. 

2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that concurrence has 

been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared document with the Court. 

Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent 

production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party until one year after 

final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct on January 10, 2008. 

Case 5:05-cv-02905-HRL Document 171 Filed 01/11/08 Page 3 of 3