Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-01004/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-01004-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GOPRO, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLIED SUNNY LTD., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-01004-SI 

ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION 

TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 11

On February 22, 2019, plaintiff GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro”) filed a complaint initiating the instant 

action in the Northern District of California. Dkt. No. 1. On March 14, 2019, defendants filed a 

motion to dismiss for improper service, improper venue, and lack of personal jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 

11. On March 28, 2019, GoPro timely filed an Amended Complaint as well as an opposition to the 

motion to dismiss. Dkt. Nos. 20, 21; see also See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). In its opposition, 

plaintiff explained that defendants refused to withdraw their motion to dismiss despite the filing of 

the amended complaint. Dkt. No. 21 at 2. 

The original complaint has been superseded by the amended complaint and the Court will 

therefore deem the first motion to dismiss withdrawn. Defendants shall respond to the amended 

complaint no later than April 19, 2019. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 1, 2019

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:19-cv-01004-SI Document 22 Filed 04/01/19 Page 1 of 1