Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-01268/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-01268-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION RE: AUTHENTICITY OF 

THIRD PARTY DOCUMENTS 

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST (KAW) 

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05585-JST 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DARIN W. SNYDER (S. B. #136003)

dsnyder@omm.com 

MARK E. MILLER (S.B. #130200) 

markmiller@omm.com 

GEOFFREY H. YOST (S.B. #159687) 

gyost@omm.com 

ANNE E. HUFFSMITH (s.b. #236438) 

ahuffsmith@omm.com 

ALEXANDER B. PARKER (S.B. #264705) 

aparker@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center 

28th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-3823 

Telephone: +1 415 984 8700 

Facsimile: +1 415 984 8701 

Attorneys for Defendant 

[24]7.ai, Inc. 

MICHAEL W. DE VRIES (S.B. #211001) 

michael.devries@kirkland.com 

SHARRE LOTFOLLAHI (S.B. #258913) 

sharre.lotfollahi @kirkland.com 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

333 South Hope Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 680-8400 

Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LivePerson, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO 

LivePerson, Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

[24]7.ai, Inc., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:17-CV-01268-JST 

 

[24]7.ai, Inc. and 24/7 Customer International 

Holdings, Ltd., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LivePerson, Inc., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:15-CV-02897-JST (KAW) 

(Lead Case) 

Case No. 3:15-CV-05585-JST (KAW) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: AUTHENTICITY OF 

THIRD PARTY DOCUMENTS 

 

Case 4:17-cv-01268-JST Document 336 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 4
- 1 - 

STIPULATION RE: AUTHENTICITY OF 

THIRD PARTY DOCUMENTS 

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST (KAW) 

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05585-JST 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION 

LivePerson, Inc. and (“LivePerson”) and [24]7.ai, Inc. and 24/7 Customer Holdings, Inc. 

(collectively, “[24]7”) have obtained documents from third parties in response to the service of 

subpoenas under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 in LivePerson, Inc. v. [24]7.ai, Inc., No. 3:17-cv-01268-JST, 

and [24]7.ai, Inc. and 24/7 Customer International Holdings, Ltd. v. LivePerson, Inc., Nos. 3:15-

cv-02897-JST (KAW) and 3:15-cv-05585-JST (KAW) (the “Actions”).

The parties, subject to the approval of the Court, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 

1. Documents produced in the Actions by a third party in response to a subpoena 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 (“third-party documents”) shall be presumed authentic 

within the meaning of Federal Rule of Evidence 901 for the purposes of the 

Actions only. 

2. Neither party will object to the authenticity of the third-party documents for 

the purposes of the Actions absent good cause. Good cause requires 

affirmative evidence that a document is not authentic, such as evidence that a 

document is not what it purports to be, is incomplete (e.g., missing or 

incomplete pages), or has been modified from the form in which the third party 

originally produced it. 

3. For the purposes of the Actions only, a sworn declaration provided by a third 

party shall be deemed admissible sworn testimony for the sole purpose of 

establishing foundational facts regarding the admissibility of the third-party 

documents and [24]7 and LivePerson documents sent to or received from the 

third party into evidence, including facts demonstrating the applicability of an 

exception to the rule against hearsay pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 803. 

Any party seeking to admit such a third party declaration must serve such 

declaration on the opposing party by May 3, 2018. 

 SO STIPULATED. 

Case 4:17-cv-01268-JST Document 336 Filed 02/07/18 Page 2 of 4
- 2 - 

STIPULATION RE: AUTHENTICITY OF 

THIRD PARTY DOCUMENTS 

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST (KAW) 

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05585-JST 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: February 6 , 2018 SHARRE LOTFOLLAHI 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

By: /s/ Sharre Lotfollahi 

 Sharre Lotfollahi 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LivePerson, Inc. 

Dated: February 6, 2018 GEOFFREY H. YOST 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Geoffrey H. Yost 

 Geoffrey H. Yost 

Attorneys for Defendant 

[24]7.ai, Inc. 

ATTESTATION 

 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from Sharre Lotfollahi of Kirkland & Ellis, counsel for LivePerson. 

Dated: February 6, 2018 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Geoffrey H. Yost 

 Geoffrey H. Yost 

Case 4:17-cv-01268-JST Document 336 Filed 02/07/18 Page 3 of 4
- 3 - 

STIPULATION RE: AUTHENTICITY OF 

THIRD PARTY DOCUMENTS 

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST (KAW) 

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05585-JST 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER 

1. Documents produced in the Actions by a third party in response to a subpoena 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 (“third-party documents”) shall be presumed authentic 

within the meaning of Federal Rule of Evidence 901 for the purposes of the 

Actions only. 

2. Neither party will object to the authenticity of the third-party documents for 

the purposes of the Actions absent good cause. Good cause requires 

affirmative evidence that a document is not authentic, such as evidence that a 

document is not what it purports to be, is incomplete (e.g., missing or 

incomplete pages), or has been modified from the form in which the third party 

originally produced it. 

3. For the purposes of the Actions only, a sworn declaration provided by a third 

party shall be deemed admissible sworn testimony for the sole purpose of 

establishing foundational facts regarding the admissibility of the third-party 

documents and [24]7 and LivePerson documents sent to or received from the 

third party into evidence, including facts demonstrating the applicability of an 

exception to the rule against hearsay pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 803. 

Any party seeking to admit such a third party declaration must serve such 

declaration on the opposing party by May 3, 2018. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________, 2018 ________________________________________________

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge 

Northern District of California 

February 7

Case 4:17-cv-01268-JST Document 336 Filed 02/07/18 Page 4 of 4