Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-04553/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-04553-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOHAMMAD HAIDER AGHA HASAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JON S. TIGAR, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 19-cv-04553-HSG 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On September 16, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 

and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 10. The Court directed Plaintiff to 

file an amended complaint no later than September 30, 2019, and warned Plaintiff that failure to 

file by the deadline may result in the dismissal of the action in its entirety without further leave to 

amend. Id. at 3–4. Plaintiff did not file his amended complaint, and the deadline for Plaintiff to 

do so has long passed. To date, the Court has not received any further communications from 

Plaintiff.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) provides that where a “plaintiff fails to prosecute or 

to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any 

claim against it.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Court may also sua sponte dismiss a case for lack of 

prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962). The Court finds that Plaintiff 

has demonstrated that he is unable or unwilling to adequately prosecute this case. Accordingly, 

the Court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Rule 41(b) for failure to 

prosecute. The Clerk shall close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

10/23/2019

Case 4:19-cv-04553-HSG Document 14 Filed 10/23/19 Page 1 of 1