Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02873/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02873-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONATHAN WYCINSKY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF RICHMOND, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-02873-SK 

REFERRAL FOR REASSIGNMENT 

AND REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Regarding Docket No. 8

Defendant City of Richmond filed a motion to dismiss on June 3, 2016. Plaintiff Jonathan 

Wycinsky’s opposition was due to be filed by no later than June 17, 2016. Plaintiff failed to file 

an opposition brief. On June 23, 2016, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) why the 

Court should not dismiss this case for failure to prosecute or, in the alternative, grant a pending 

motion to dismiss as unopposed. Plaintiff’s response to the OSC was due by no later than June 30, 

2016. The Court admonished Plaintiff that his failure to file a response to the OSC by June 30, 

2016 would lead to the Court reassigning this case to a District Judge and recommending that this 

case be dismissed without prejudice without further notice to Plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to file a 

response to the OSC as well. 

Plaintiff not consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), 

and, therefore, the Court does not have authority to make a dispositive ruling in this case. 

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case be REASSIGNED to a District Judge. The Court 

///

///

///

///

Case 3:16-cv-02873-MMC Document 10 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the District Court DISMISS this action without prejudice for 

failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 12, 2016

______________________________________

SALLIE KIM

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cv-02873-MMC Document 10 Filed 07/12/16 Page 2 of 2