Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02087/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02087-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOHN DELEON, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated and 

on behalf of the general public, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ELITE SELF STORAGE 

MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California 

limited liability company, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-2087-MCE-EFB 

ORDER AFTER HEARING 

 This matter was before the court on November 2, 2016, for hearing on defendants Mandot, 

LLC, dba 1st American Self Storage (“1st American”), Budget Self Storage, LLC, dba Tiger Self 

Storage (“Tiger”), Elite Self Storage Management, LLC (“Elite”), Brandon Joseph Luthye and 

Tina Luthye’s motion to compel plaintiff John DeLeon to provide further responses to 

interrogatories. ECF No. 84. Attorney Jason Shon appeared on behalf of the moving defendants 

and attorney Raeon Roulston appeared on behalf of behalf of plaintiff.1

 

///// 

 1

 Also appearing at the hearing, by telephone, were attorney Christopher Bakes on behalf 

of third-party defendant Sage Insurance Servicing, LLC and attorney Jennifer Axel on behalf of 

defendant Repwest Insurance and third-party defendant Ponderosa Insurance Agency, LLC. 

Case 2:15-cv-02087-MCE-EFB Document 98 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 For the reasons stated on the record, the moving defendants’ motion to compel (ECF No. 

84) is granted in part and denied in part. Within 14 days of this order, plaintiff shall serve 

supplemental responses to 1st American’s interrogatories number 1 and 2, Tiger’s interrogatories 

numbers 5 and 6, and Elite’s interrogatories numbers 16-20 that shall be based on plaintiff’s own 

experiences and knowledge. Defendants’ motion to compel is denied in all other regards. 

DATED: November 3, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-02087-MCE-EFB Document 98 Filed 11/04/16 Page 2 of 2