Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04708/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04708-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. C04-04708 VRW -1-

TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP 

DANIEL J. FURNISS (State Bar No. 73531) djfurniss@townsend.com 

THEODORE G. BROWN, III (State Bar No. 114672) tgbrown@townsend.com 

SUSAN M. SPAETH (State Bar No. 142652) smspaeth@townsend.com 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400 

Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

KENNETH L. NISSLY (State Bar No. 77589) kennissly@thelenreid.com 

SUSAN VAN KEULEN (State Bar No. 136060) svankeulen@thelenreid.com 

225 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 1200 

San Jose, California 95113 

Telephone: (408) 292-5800 

Facsimile: (408) 287-8040 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., 

Defendant.

 Case No. C04 04708 VRW 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., 

Counterclaimant, 

v.

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA 

AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., 

TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER 

PRODUCTS, L.L.C., TOSHIBA AMERICA 

ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., 

TOSHIBA AMERICA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 

INC., and TOSHIBA AMERICA BUSINESS 

SOLUTIONS, INC. 

Counterdefendants.

Case 3:04-cv-04708-VRW Document 57 Filed 09/23/05 Page 1 of 4
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER -2-

CASE NO. C04-04708 VRW 

 Pursuant to rulings made during the case management conference on August 30, 2005, and 

subsequent meeting and conferring between the parties, the Court hereby sets the following pretrial 

schedule and limits discovery pending completion of claim construction, as follows: 

September 14, 2005: Hynix's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Preliminary Infringement 

Contentions (Local Patent Rules 3-1 and 3-2) 

October 31, 2005: Toshiba's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions (Local Patent Rules 3-3 

and 3-4) 

November 15, 2005: Parties Exchange Lists of Claim Terms for Construction By Court 

(Local Patent Rule 4-1) 

November 30, 2005: Parties Exchange Proposed Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence

(Local Patent Rule 4-2) 

December 15, 2005: Parties To File Joint Claim Construction Statement (Local Patent Rule 

4-3)

January 16, 2006: Hynix serves and files Opening Claim Construction Brief (Local Patent 

Rule 4-5(a)) 

February 13, 2006: Toshiba serves and files Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Local 

Patent Rule 4-5(b)) 

March 6, 2006: Hynix serves and files Reply Claim Construction Brief (Local Patent 

Rule (4-5 (c)) 

March 20, 2006: Markman Hearing (at Court's discretion) 

(approximate) 

 Any declarations or opinions of experts in support of the parties' claim constructions shall be 

filed and served with or prior to the parties' corresponding opening or responsive claim construction 

briefs, and any such experts shall be made available for deposition regarding the subject matter of 

such declarations or opinions within two weeks (unless otherwise agreed by the parties) following the 

submission of such declarations or opinions. 

 All discovery not reasonably related to claim construction issues shall be stayed pending the 

Court's Claim Construction Order, absent agreement of the parties or order of the Court. 

 Both parties have contacted the Court regarding the inclusion of U.S. Patent 5,200,030 from 

C05-02914-VRW into this schedule. Toshiba takes the position that the ‘030 patent should be 

included in and subject to this pretrial discovery schedule, as stated in the Court’s Civil Pretrial 

Minutes of August 30, 2005. Hynix's position is that, since the complaint in C05-02914-VRW has 

Markman hearing - March 29, 2006

Case 3:04-cv-04708-VRW Document 57 Filed 09/23/05 Page 2 of 4
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER -3-

CASE NO. C04-04708 VRW 

only recently been served and Hynix is not required to answer or otherwise respond to this complaint 

until October 10, 2005, setting a schedule in the C05-02914-VRW action is premature. This issue has 

not yet been ruled on by the Court. 

Respectfully Submitted: 

Dated: September 6, 2005 DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP 

By /S/ Alan A. Limbach 

MARK FOWLER 

RONALD L. YIN 

ALAN A. LIMBACH 

M. ELIZABETH DAY 

VINCENT LAM 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendants 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA 

AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., 

TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER 

PRODUCTS, L.L.C., TOSHIBA AMERICA 

ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., 

TOSHIBA AMERICA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 

INC., AND TOSHIBA AMERICA BUSINESS 

SOLUTIONS, INC. 

Dated: September 6, 2005 TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP 

By /S/ Theodore G. Brown, III 

Daniel J. Furniss 

Theodore G. Brown, III 

Susan M. Spaeth 

Robert A. McFarlane 

Anne M. Rogaski 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

Kenneth L. Nissly 

Susan Van Keulen 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. 

 Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I 

attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from 

Case 3:04-cv-04708-VRW Document 57 Filed 09/23/05 Page 3 of 4
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER -4-

CASE NO. C04-04708 VRW 

Alan A. Limbach, DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP. 

Dated: September 6, 2005 TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP 

By /S/ Theodore G. Brown, III 

Theodore G. Brown, III 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

DATED: , 2005 

VAUGHN R. WALKER 

 United States District Judge 

60585069 v1

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:04-cv-04708-VRW Document 57 Filed 09/23/05 Page 4 of 4