Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00157/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00157-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Contitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RICHARD A. JONES (CA Bar 135248) JUDY L. HARTLEY (CA Bar 110628)

COVINGTON & BURLING DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS

One Front Street State of California

San Francisco, California 94111 320 West 4th Street, Ste.750

Telephone: (415) 591-6000 Los Angeles, California 90013-2344

Fax: (415) 591-6091

Telephone: (213) 576-7604

Fax: (213) 576-7181

E. EDWARD BRUCE (pro hac vice) DOUGLAS GOODING (CA Bar 083518)

STUART C. STOCK (pro hac vice) DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS

ROBERT A. LONG (pro hac vice) State of California

KEITH A. NOREIKA (pro hac vice) 7 Stevenson Street, Suite 2100

COVINGTON & BURLING San Francisco, California 94105

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Telephone: (415) 972-8548

Washington, D.C. 20004 Fax: (415) 972-8571

Telephone: (202) 662-6000

Fax: (202) 662-6291 Attorneys for Defendant

MICHAEL J. STEINER (CA Bar 112079)

SEVERSON & WERSON, 

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-3344

Fax: (415) 956-0439

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and )

WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) 2:03-cv-00157-GEB-JFM

)

versus ) [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

) AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

DEMETRIOS A. BOUTRIS,

in his official capacity as Commissioner of 

)

)

the California Department of Corporations, )

)

Defendant. )

)

Case 2:03-cv-00157-GEB -JFM Document 150 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Judgment is entered permanently enjoining the Commissioner and agents acting

on behalf of the Commissioner from exercising visitorial powers over plaintiffs; further,

judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs on their Supremacy Clause preemption claims under the

National Bank Act and its implementing regulations and in favor of the Commissioner on

plaintiffs’ Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, retaliation, 42

U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1988 claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 23, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-00157-GEB -JFM Document 150 Filed 09/26/05 Page 2 of 2