Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03808/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03808-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SFO 297868v2 65187-634 

Case No. 06-03808 SBA 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

Joseph E. Addiego III (CA State Bar No. 169522) 

Salle E. Yoo (CA State Bar No. 182703) 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 600 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 276-6500 

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 

Email: joeaddiego@dwt.com 

 salleyoo@dwt.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC, a Nevada 

limited liability company, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Peralta Community College District, a California 

public agency, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

) 

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 06-03808 SBA 

Action Filed: June 16, 2006 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND FILING DEADLINES ON 

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION 

Judge: Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong 

 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Clearwire Spectrum 

Holdings, LLC (“CSH” or “Clearwire”) and Defendant Peralta Community College District 

(“Peralta”) (collectively, the “Parties”) and requested of this Court that the deadlines set forth in 

this Court’s June 22, 2006 Order Denying Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for a Temporary Restraining 

Order concerning the briefing on any potential Motion by CSH for a Preliminary Injunction be 

extended, so that the Parties may have a short period of time to explore the potential resolution of 

this matter without the necessity of incurring the expense of preparing such moving, opposition 

and reply papers. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT CSH, if it desires to file a motion for preliminary 

Case 4:06-cv-03808-SBA Document 15 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 2
 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SFO 297868v2 65187-634 

Case No. 06-03808 SBA 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

injunction, shall file its moving papers no later than Friday, June 30, 2006. Peralta shall file its 

opposition, if any, no later than Friday, July 7, 2006. Plaintiff shall file its reply, if any, no later 

than Tuesday, July 11. The July 18, 2006 hearing date remains the same as set forth in the Court’s 

June 22, 2006 Order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED this 27th day of June, 2006. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

By: /s/ Joseph E. Addiego III .

 Joseph E. Addiego III 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Clearwire Spectrum Holdings LLC 

DATED this 27th day of June, 2006. 

GIBBS & OLIPHANT LLP 

By: /s/ Harold P. Smith .

HAROLD P. SMITH 

Attorneys for Peralta Community 

College District 

ORDER

The above Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Filing Deadlines on Motion For 

Preliminary Injunction is hereby adopted and approved by the Court. The parties are ordered to 

comply with this Order. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Dated: June 28, 2006 

 __________

The Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong 

Judge of the U.S. District Court 

Northern District of California 

Case 4:06-cv-03808-SBA Document 15 Filed 06/28/06 Page 2 of 2