Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00967/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00967-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Tort Claim

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD NUWINTORE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1: 13-CV-00967-AWI - JLT

SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)

Pleading Amendment Deadline: 4/7/2016

Discovery Deadlines: 

Initial Disclosures: 1/23/2017

Non-Expert: 12/1/2017

Expert: 3/16/2018

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:

Filing: 3/30/2018

Hearing: 4/27/2018

Dispositive Motion Deadlines: 

Filing: 5/11/2018

Hearing: 7/9/2018

Settlement Conference:

8/17/2018 at 9:30 a.m.

 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

Pre-Trial Conference:

9/4/2018 at 10:00 a.m.

Courtroom 2

Trial: 10/30/2018 at 8:30 a.m.

 Courtroom 2

 Jury and Court trial: 5-7 days

Case 1:13-cv-00967-AWI-JLT Document 122 Filed 01/10/17 Page 1 of 7
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I. Date of Scheduling Conference

January 9, 2016.

II. Appearances of Counsel

Ian Wallach appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

Susan Coleman appeared on behalf of Defendant Management & Training Corporation.

Alyson Berg appeared on behalf of the Government.

III. Pleading Amendment Deadline

Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or 

motion to amend, no later than April 7, 2016.

IV. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) 

on or before January 23, 2017.

The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before 

December 1, 2017, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before March 16, 2018.

Plaintiff SHALL disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before December 15, 2017; 

and Defendant SHALL disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, no later than January 19, 2018. Any 

rebuttal experts for Plaintiff SHALL be disclosed no later than February 16, 2018. The written 

designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 

26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to 

designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other 

evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts 

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions 

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may 

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement 

 

1

In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the 

examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the 

expert’s opinions in this regard.

Case 1:13-cv-00967-AWI-JLT Document 122 Filed 01/10/17 Page 2 of 7
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.

V. Pre-Trial Motion Schedule

All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later 

than March 30, 2018, and heard on or before April 27, 2018. Non-dispositive motions are heard at 

9:00 a.m., before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United 

States District Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California. 

No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned 

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good 

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the 

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate 

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the 

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk, 

Susan Hall at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with 

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice 

and dropped from calendar.

In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening 

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the 

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251. 

Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written 

request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days 

before the noticed hearing date. 

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than May 11, 2018, and heard no later 

than July 9, 2018, in Courtroom 2 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United States 

District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and 

Local Rules 230 and 260.

VI. Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary 

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues to 

Case 1:13-cv-00967-AWI-JLT Document 122 Filed 01/10/17 Page 3 of 7
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

be raised in the motion.

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a 

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole or 

in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the issues 

for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the expense of 

briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.

The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed 

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of 

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be 

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint 

statement of undisputed facts. 

In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred 

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to 

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

VII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

September 4, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before Judge Ishii.

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2). 

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

directly to Judge Ishii's chambers, by email at AWIOrders@caed.uscourts.gov. 

Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the 

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference. 

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the 

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the 

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

VIII. Trial Date

October 30, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United 

States District Court Judge.

A. This is both a jury and bench trial. The claims against the Government will be heard by 

Case 1:13-cv-00967-AWI-JLT Document 122 Filed 01/10/17 Page 4 of 7
5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the Court, and the claims against defendant Management and Training Corporation tried by jury.

B. Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 5-7 days. 

C. Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of 

California, Rule 285.

IX. Settlement Conference

A Settlement Conference is scheduled for August 17, 2018 at 9:30 a.m., located at 510 19th

Street, Bakersfield, California. Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement 

conference will be conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. The Court deems the deviation from the 

Local Rule to be appropriate and in the interests of the parties and justice and sound case management 

based upon the location of the parties. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be 

conducted by a different judicial officer, that party is directed to notify the Court no later than 60 

days in advance of the scheduled settlement conference to allow sufficient time for another judicial 

officer to be assigned to handle the conference. 

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall 

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority

to negotiate and settle the case on any terms2at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a 

serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the 

procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.

At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via 

fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful3settlement demand which includes a 

brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the 

settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or 

 

2

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements 

are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by 

a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in 

the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the 

authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent 

demand.

3

“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering 

party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,

however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should 

trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the 

settlement conference via stipulation.

Case 1:13-cv-00967-AWI-JLT Document 122 Filed 01/10/17 Page 5 of 7
6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

with a meaningful counteroffer which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is 

appropriate. 

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their 

Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall 

not be filed on the court docket.

CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

At least five court days before the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to 

Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov, a Confidential Settlement 

Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on 

any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference 

Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the 

Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon. 

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

A. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

B. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which 

the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on 

the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

C. A summary of the proceedings to date.

D. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial. 

E. The relief sought.

F. The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of 

past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

X. Requests for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other 

Techniques to Shorten Trial

Not applicable at this time.

XI. Related Matters Pending

A. Edison v. United States, et al., Case No. 1:12-CV-02026 AWI-JLT

B. Domingo v. Management & Training Corp., et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00284 AWI-JLT

Case 1:13-cv-00967-AWI-JLT Document 122 Filed 01/10/17 Page 6 of 7
7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C. Mercardo, et al. v. United States, et al., Case No. 1:13-CV-01535 AWI-JLT.XII.

Compliance with Federal Procedure

All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any 

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently 

handle its increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as 

provided in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern 

District of California.

XIII. Effect of this Order

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most 

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the 

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered 

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by 

subsequent status conference.

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a 

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations 

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by 

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause 

for granting the relief requested.

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00967-AWI-JLT Document 122 Filed 01/10/17 Page 7 of 7