Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00350/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00350-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CARLETON L. BRIGGS, SBN 117361

Law Offices of Carleton L. Briggs

740 Fourth Street, Suite 202

Santa Rosa, CA 95404-4421

Telephone: (707) 523-2251

Facsimile: (707) 523-2253

E-mail: clbriggs@sonic.net

Attorneys for Plaintiff

George Barich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE BARICH,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF COTATI, and

MICHAEL PARISH,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-cv-00350-VC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached

the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

X Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate

in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice

1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process

Case 3:15-cv-00350-VC Document 21 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) 

______________________

________________________________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

X the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

9 other requested deadline

_____________________________________________

Dated: July 28, 2015 Law Offices of Carleton L. Briggs

By /s/ Carleton L. Briggs _ 

 CARLETON L. BRIGGS

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GEORGE BARICH

Dated: July 28, 2015 GEARY, SHEA, O'DONNELL,

GRATTAN & MITCHELL, P.C.

By /s/ Robert W. Henkels 

 ROBERT W. HENKELS

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF COTATI and MICHAEL

PARISH

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process

Case 3:15-cv-00350-VC Document 21 Filed 07/31/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

9 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________________________

UNITED STATES JUDGE

3

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process

XXJuly 31, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vince Chhabria

Case 3:15-cv-00350-VC Document 21 Filed 07/31/15 Page 3 of 3