Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06329/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06329-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAROLD WALKER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et )

al., )

Defendants. )

)

 )

1:04-CV-6329-REC-SMS 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION RE: PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(DOCS. 21, 19)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner confined in Wasco State Prison 

who is proceeding pro se with an action concerning alleged civil

right violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On April 25, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and a

recommendation to deny Plaintiff’s motion, filed on March 29,

2005, for a court order requiring that he be given access to the

law library, to other legal materials, and to the Court, which

the Court interpreted as a request for injunctive relief. The

findings and recommendation were served on all parties and

contained notice that any objections to the findings and

recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the

date of service of the order. No party has filed any objections.

Case 1:04-cv-06329-OWW -SMS Document 26 Filed 06/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the report and recommendation are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation filed April 25, 2005, are

ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief IS DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06329-OWW -SMS Document 26 Filed 06/10/05 Page 2 of 2