Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05647/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-05647-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1337 Sherman-Clayton Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IPTRONICS INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-05647-BLF 

ORDER ALLOWING SUBSTITUTE 

BRIEFING; STRIKING OPPOSITION 

AND REPLY BRIEF

[Re: ECF 44, 45, 48]

The Court has reviewed the administrative motion for leave to file a sur-reply filed by 

Plaintiffs, ECF 48, as well as Defendants’ opposition thereto, ECF 49. The Court considers the 

corrected motion that Defendants filed on March 23, 2015 at ECF 43 to be the operative motion. 

As such, and in the interest of fairness and clarity, the Court finds good cause to STRIKE 

Plaintiffs’ opposition brief filed on March 23, 2015 (ECF 44) and Defendants’ reply brief filed on 

March 30, 2015 (ECF 45) with leave to file substitute briefing relating to the operative corrected 

motion at ECF 43. This will afford both parties the opportunity to address the changes made in 

Defendants’ corrected motion.

Plaintiffs’ substitute opposition brief shall be due by May 14, 2015. Defendants’ 

substitute reply brief shall be due by May 21, 2015. No additional pages will be permitted, and 

both parties are advised that the Court will not consider new evidence introduced for the first time 

in a reply brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2015

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-05647-BLF Document 51 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 1