Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04241/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04241-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH BATCHELDER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

FEDERAL BUREAU PRISON,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 05-04241 CRB

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff seeks to prosecute this action in forma pauperis. By Order dated November

22, 2005, the Court noted that the judge to whom this case was previously assigned had

already once ordered plaintiff to amend his complaint; plaintiff’s amendments in response to

that order did not state a claim. Accordingly, this Court gave plaintiff “one final chance to

state a claim.” The Court directed that on or before December 9, 2005, plaintiff shall file a

statement, not to exceed two double-spaced pages, that clearly identifies (1) the law under

which he brings his claims, (2) the conduct which he is challenging and the reason or reasons

such conduct was unlawful, and (3) the remedy he is seeking, that is, what he wants the Court

to order. The November 22 order warned plaintiff that his failure to comply with this Order

will result in denial of motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

The Court has received documents from plaintiff signed on November 21, 2005 (and

filed November 22, 2005) and another set postmarked November 21, 2005. He also faxed 

Case 3:05-cv-04241-CRB Document 24 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\4241\orderofdismissal.wpd 2

certain documents to the chambers of the judge to whom this case was previously assigned.

None of these documents is responsive to the Court’s order. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion

to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: Dec. 19, 2005

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-04241-CRB Document 24 Filed 12/19/05 Page 2 of 2