Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00105/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00105-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK SHAUN LOVEDAY,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-0105 GEB DAD P

vs.

M. YARBOROUGH, Warden,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed April 24, 2006, petitioner was ordered to file his opposition or

statement of non-opposition to respondent’s December 6, 2005 motion to dismiss within twenty

days, and that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed without prejudice. The twenty day period has now expired, and petitioner has

not responded to the court's order.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Case 2:05-cv-00105-GEB-DAD Document 15 Filed 05/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 24, 2006.

DAD:4

love0105.foppo

Case 2:05-cv-00105-GEB-DAD Document 15 Filed 05/25/06 Page 2 of 2