Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00117/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00117-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ______________________________________

Stip. and Order Extending Time for Plaintiff’s

Reply Memo. – Case No. 05-CV-00117 REC - 1 -

Robert A. Spanner, Esq. (State Bar No. 60308)

TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

545 Middlefield Road, Suite 220

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 324-2223

Facsimile: (650) 324-0178

Attorneys for Plaintiff

OPTISTREAMS, INC.

Howard A. Sagaser, Esq. (State Bar No. 72492)

SAGASER JONES & HAHESY

2445 Capitol Street, Second Floor

Fresno, CA 93721

Telephone: (559) 233-4800

Facsimile: (559) 233-9330

Attorneys for Defendant

SEAN GAHAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

OPTISTREAMS, INC.

Plaintiff,

vs.

SEAN GAHAN, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-CV-00117 REC (SMS)

STIPULATION AND ORDER

EXTENDING TIME RE

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF

ITS MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY

DISMISS ITS COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT

TO F.R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2)

Date: February 6, 2006

Time: 1:30 p.m.

Judge Robert E. Coyle

Case 1:05-cv-00117-AWI -SMS Document 89 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ______________________________________

Stip. and Order Extending Time for Plaintiff’s

Reply Memo. – Case No. 05-CV-00117 REC - 2 -

WHEREAS on December 28, 2005 Plaintiff filed its Motion To Voluntarily

Dismiss Its Complaint Without Prejudice Pursuant to F.R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) (“OptiStreams’

Motion To Voluntarily Dismiss”), noticing the hearing for January 30, 2006;

WHEREAS L.R. 72-830(c) requires that oppositions to motions be served not less

than 17 days preceding the hearing date if served electronically;

WHEREAS Defendant filed and electronically served his Opposition to

OptiStreams’ Motion To Voluntarily Dismiss on January 17, 2006;

WHEREAS L.R. 72-830(d) requires that reply memoranda be filed and served not

less than 5 court days preceding the hearing;

WHEREAS on January 18, 2006 Defendant’s counsel agreed in writing to stipulate

to extending Plaintiff’s date for a reply, and suggested continuing the hearing on

OptiStreams’ Motion To Voluntarily Dismiss to February 6, 2006; 

WHEREAS on January 19, 2006 the Court continued the hearing on “OptiStreams’

Motion To Voluntarily Dismiss to February 6, 2006;

Plaintiff OptiStreams, Inc. (“OptiStreams”) and Defendant Sean Gahan (“Gahan”),

by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. OptiStreams’ reply to Gahan’s Opposition to OptiStreams’ Motion To 

Case 1:05-cv-00117-AWI -SMS Document 89 Filed 01/20/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ______________________________________

Stip. and Order Extending Time for Plaintiff’s

Reply Memo. – Case No. 05-CV-00117 REC - 3 -

Voluntarily Dismiss shall be electronically filed and served by January 27, 2006.

Dated: 1/19/06 TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiff

OPTISTREAMS, INC.

By: /s/ Robert A. Spanner 

Robert A. Spanner

Dated: January 19, 2006 SAGASER JONES & HAHESY

Attorneys for Defendant

SEAN GAHAN

By: /s/ Howard A. Sagaser 

Howard A. Sagaser

ORDER

Good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___January 20, 2006_ /s/ ROBERT E. COYLE________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00117-AWI -SMS Document 89 Filed 01/20/06 Page 3 of 3