Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02099/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02099-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME 

FOR DEFENDANT SPRIOS HALIKOAS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ 

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IRMA RAMIREZ, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES:HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STAR RESTAURANT COTATI; SPRIOS

HALIKOAS; and SAM ATALLAH, an

individual dba STAR RESTAURANT,

Defendants, ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C07-2099-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANT SPRIOS HALIKOAS

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs Irma Ramirez and Disability Rights Enforcement, Education Services, through

their undersigned counsel, and defendant Sprios Halikoas, through his undersigned counsel,

stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant Sprios Halikoas is granted an extension of time to and including July

15, 2007, to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ complaint.

2. In the event defendant Sprios Halikoas files a motion in lieu of an answer to

plaintiffs’ complaint, the hearing on such motion shall be set on a date no sooner than 45 days

from the service of said motion.

Case 3:07-cv-02099-SI Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:07-cv-02099-SI Document 9 Filed 07/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME 

FOR DEFENDANT SPRIOS HALIKOAS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 2

3. Defendant’s counsel further stipulates that defendant will comply with any and all

due dates dictated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Court, and/or any

scheduling order issued by the court prior to the date on which defendant’s responsive pleading

is due hereunder.

This Stipulation may be executed in faxed counterparts, all of which together shall

constitute one original document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: July 5, 2007 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ 

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

Dated: June 27, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF EDWIN GRUNDSTROM

By: /s/ 

Edwin V. Grundstrom

Attorneys for Defendant SPRIOS HALIKOAS

O R D E R 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: , 2007

______________________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Court Judge

Case 3:07-cv-02099-SI Document 8 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 2 Case 3:07-cv-02099-SI Document 9 Filed 07/06/07 Page 2 of 2