Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00841/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00841-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 730
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Report &amp; Disclosure
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(Proposed) Order on Summary Judgment, Case No. 1:06-CV-00841--OWW-DLB -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS

REPRESENTATIVES; JIM HICKS;

GENEVIEVE FIDALGO; JAVIER GARCIA;

LUPE JUAREZ; RALPH RAMIREZ and JACK

SMITH,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 948,

Defendant.

 _______________________________________

TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 948,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS

REPRESENTATIVES,

Defendants.

_______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:06-CV-00841- OWW DLB

CONSOLIDATED WITH 1:06-CV-1492

OWW DLB

ORDER GRANTING NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS

REPRESENTATIVES (NABR)’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

DENYING TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION

#948'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

The motion of National Association of Business Representatives (NABR) for summary

judgment, and the motion of Teamsters Local Union #928 for summary judgment came on regularly for

hearing before this Court on October 1, 2007. Sylvia Courtney appeared as attorney for National

Association of Business Representatives (NABR) and Caren P. Sencer, Weinberg, Roger and

Rosenfeld, appeared as attorney for Teamsters Local Union #948. By prior stipulation of the parties

Case 1:06-cv-00841-OWW -DLB Document 37 Filed 10/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(Proposed) Order on Summary Judgment, Case No. 1:06-CV-00841--OWW-DLB -2-

and order thereon, the claims of Plaintiffs Jim Hicks, Genevieve Fidalgo, Javier Garcia, Lupe Juarez,

Ralph Ramirez and Jack Smith pursuant to the Third Claim for Relief for violation of the Labor

Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. Section 411, et seq., were dismissed.

After considering the moving and opposition papers, arguments of counsel and all other matters

presented to the Court, and consistent with its Memorandum Decision entered on October 3, 2007, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of National Association of Business Representatives

(NABR) for summary judgment is granted, and the motion of Teamsters Local Union #948 for

summary judgment is denied.

Dated: October 20, 2007

/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER

________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00841-OWW -DLB Document 37 Filed 10/23/07 Page 2 of 2