Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02510/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02510-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOUIS SANDOVAL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2510 DFL EFB P

vs.

CALIFORNIA MEDICAL

FACILITY,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On January 10, 2006, the court gave plaintiff 30 days to submit a certified copy of his

trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the

complaint and warned him that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed. Plaintiff notified the court that he did not understand the order. On March 30,

2006, the court again explained the requirement and gave plaintiff 30 days to file a copy of his

trust account statement. On April 28, 2006, plaintiff notified the court that he has $100 for prepayment of the filing fee. On July 26, 2006, the court gave plaintiff another chance to submit a

copy of his trust account statement within 30 days and warned plaintiff that failure to do so

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not submitted a copy of his trust account

statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or 

Case 2:05-cv-02510-RRB-EFB Document 19 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

otherwise responded to that order.

It therefore is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: November 15, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02510-RRB-EFB Document 19 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 2