Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00789/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00789-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Plaintiff has filed another defective motion for declaratory and injunctive relief. In this 1

court’s December 5, 2007 order, the court advised plaintiff that such a motion would not suffice

as his second amended complaint. This court twice advised plaintiff of the defects of his

complaint and informed him that, if he was interested in pursuing this action, he was required

submit a second amended complaint that followed the instructions provided in this court’s

September 18, 2007 order. Again, plaintiff has failed to comply with the court’s order. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES E. SMITH,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0789 LKK DAD P

vs.

GARY ALLHISER, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed September 18, 2007, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed

and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. On December 5, 2007

plaintiff was granted a final thirty day extension of time in which to file a second amended

complaint. Plaintiff was forewarned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that

this action be dismissed. That period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second

amended complaint.

1

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00789-LKK -DAD Document 28 Filed 01/17/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 17, 2008.

DAD:lg

smit0789.fta

Case 2:06-cv-00789-LKK -DAD Document 28 Filed 01/17/08 Page 2 of 2