Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02588/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02588-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HENRY R. HU and STEPHANIE F. HU, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LANEY LEE, JASON WANG, STEWARD 

WANG, ANITA BEI HUANG, JERRY 

HUANG, EDWARD WONG, KING MARK, I95 MALL OF ASIA INC., A.T.E.C. 

HOLDING INC., AMERICAN PRODUCTS 

EXHIBITION & EXCHANGE CENTER 

(U.S.A.), INC., ETRADE GUARANTEE 

ASSURANCE CORP., EASY EXPRESS 

SERVICES CORP., KATHY WANG, RUNAN 

ZHANG, ANDY TING, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 09-2588 SC 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT RUNAN 

ZHANG'S NOTICE OF MOTION 

AND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME, 

MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION 

TO STRIKE

 The Court has received Defendant Runan Zhang's ex parte 

motion, entitled Notice of Motion and Motion to Extend Time, Motion 

to Dismiss, Motion to Strike ("Zhang Motion"). Defendant Runan 

Zhang is ordered to resubmit the Zhang Motion in compliance with 

General Order No. 45, regarding Electronic Case Filing, no later 

than Wednesday, February 10, 2010. 

 Plaintiff Henry R. Hu and Stephanie F. Hu ("Plaintiffs") must 

submit a partial response to the Zhang Motion no later than 

Tuesday, February 16, 2010. This response need only address the 

question of whether this Court should grant Defendant Runan Zhang's 

Case 3:09-cv-02588-SC Document 40 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

request to retroactively extend the deadline for responding to 

Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint; it need not address the 

merits of the Zhang Motion with regard to the motions to dismiss 

and strike. Alternatively, Plaintiffs may file a statement of nonopposition to the Zhang Motion. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 8, 2009 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02588-SC Document 40 Filed 02/08/10 Page 2 of 2