Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06393/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06393-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VILLAGER FRANCHISE SYSTEMS,

INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DHAMI, DHAMI & VIRK, a

general partnership, MALUK

DHAMI, an individual; and

KULDIP S. DHAMI, an individual,

Defendants.

 /

AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM.

 /

1:04-cv-06393-OWW-SMS

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENSE COUNSEL

TO E-FILE A STATUS REPORT

~and~

SETTING A FURTHER/THIRD

TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE

Status Report Filing Deadline:

6/23/06

Further/Third Telephonic

Status Conference:

7/20/06, 9:00am, Judge Snyder

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s Status Conference

Report, e-filed June 8, 2006 (Doc. 53), as referenced in the

court minutes e-filed June 6, 2006 (Doc. 51). Attorney Natasha

A. Bellroth was directed by the undersigned to file a brief

status conference statement regarding the status of the dismissal

anticipated by virtue of the e-ruling of the Honorable Robert E.

Coyle on April 13, 2006 (Doc. 49).

//

Case 1:04-cv-06393-OWW -SMS Document 54 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendant’s counsel, Henry O. Boaten, is hereby ORDERED to

e-file a Status Report regarding his clients’ positions

concerning the dismissal on or before June 23, 2006. If the

Court does not hear from Attorney Boaten as herein directed, an

Order to Show Cause re: contempt for failure to abide by

previously-imposed court orders will issue, perhaps even

requiring his personal appearance in Fresno, CA.

A Further/Third Telephonic Status Conference is hereby SET

for July 20, 2006 at 9:00 a.m., with this Court for which 

Plaintiff’s counsel shall be responsible for arranging with

opposing counsel, as well as this Court.

NOTE: On June 7, 2006 (Doc. 52), Chief Judge David F. Levi

in Sacramento, CA, ordered this action reassigned from the docket

of Judge Coyle to the docket of Judge Wanger, thereby changing

the case number to 1:04-cv-06393-OWW-SMS. Counsel are herein

advised that use of an incorrect case number, including the

district judge’s initials, may result in documents being

incorrectly calendared by the appropriate judicial officer or

staff. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 12, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06393-OWW -SMS Document 54 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 2