Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02932/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02932-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was twice served

upon him and returned marked “undeliverable” and “refused,” plaintiff was properly served. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully

effective.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATHAN HALL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2932 EFB P

vs.

KATHLEEN L. WILKINSON, et al., 

ORDER AND

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On November 5, 2009, the court found that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis failed to include the required certified copy of his trust account statement. 

Accordingly, the court ordered plaintiff to submit the required trust account statement within

thirty days and warned him that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed. 

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed the required trust account

statement nor otherwise responded to the court’s order.1

////

Case 2:09-cv-02932-GEB-EFB Document 5 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign this case to a United

States District Judge.

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: February 8, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02932-GEB-EFB Document 5 Filed 02/08/10 Page 2 of 2