Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00713/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00713-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN T. MISKO,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM SULLIVAN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:10-cv-00713-LJO-BAM PC

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE 

DAYS

(ECF No. 73)

Plaintiff John T. Misko, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 23, 2010. This action proceeds against 

Defendant Williams for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the 

United States Constitution.

On April 24, 2015, Defendant Williams filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for 

summary judgment. (ECF No. 73-1.) Plaintiff’s opposition was due on or before May 18, 2015. 

To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a

///

///

Case 1:10-cv-00713-LJO-BAM Document 76 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff is 

warned that the failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action, with 

prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 22, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00713-LJO-BAM Document 76 Filed 05/22/15 Page 2 of 2