Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01794/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01794-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAUL BARRIOS PEREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

DILL, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01794-LJO-BAM PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY

DAYS IN WHICH TO FILE AN OPPOSITION

TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT IN LIGHT OF SEPARATELYISSUED SUMMARY JUDGMENT NOTICE

(ECF No. 82)

Plaintiff Saul Barrios Perez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the 

first amended complaint against DefendantsDill,Harden, Sobbe, Sandoval, Tyson, Chan, and Brown

for deliberate indifference to conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On

March 2, 2012, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. 

In light of the recent decision in Woods v. Carey, Nos. 09-15548, 09-16113, 2012 WL

2626912, at *5 (9th Cir. Jul. 6, 2012), Plaintiff must be provided with “fair notice” of the

requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment at the time the motion is brought and the

notice given in this case some three years prior does not suffice. Id.

Byseparate orderissued concurrentlywith this order, the Court provided the requisite notice. 

The Court will not consider multiple oppositions, however, and Plaintiff has received an extension

of time on June 21, 2012 to file an opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. If

Plaintiff files an opposition prior to receiving this notice he may either (1) stand on his previouslyfiled opposition or (2) withdraw it and file an amended opposition.

1

Case 1:07-cv-01794-BAM Document 88 Filed 07/12/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order file an

opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment; and

2. If Plaintiff does not file an opposition in compliance with this order, this action will

be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 12, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

10c20k UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:07-cv-01794-BAM Document 88 Filed 07/12/12 Page 2 of 2