Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00279/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00279-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits

---

1 GILBERT R. SEROTA (No. 75305)

Email: gserota@howardrice.com

2 SARAH A. GOOD (No. 148742)

Email: sgood@howardrice.com

3 FRANK Z. LaFORGE (No. 251141)

Email: flaforge@howardrice.com

4 HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY

FALK & RABKIN

5 A Professional Corporation

Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor

6 San Francisco, California 94111-4024

Telephone: 415/434-1600

7 Facsimile: 415/677-6262

8 Attorneys for Defendants

JOHN G. STUMPF, PHILIP J. QUIGLEY,

9 JOHN S. CHEN, LLOYD H. DEAN, SUSAN E.

10

ENGEL, ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ, JR.,

RICHARD D. McCORMICK, CYNTHIA H.

11

MULLIGAN, NICHOLAS G. MOORE,

DONALD B. RICE, JUDITH M. RUNSTAD,

STEPHEN W. SANGER, and SUSAN G.

12 SWENSON

HOWARD

RICE

NEMEROVSKI

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CANADY

1- 

4

FALK

Et RABKIN NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Hien inme rempory.r.

OAKLAND DIVISION

16

17 J.N. FEUER, Derivatively on Behalf of No. 10-cv-00279 PJH

18 WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and its

Shareholders and "Double Derivatively" on Action Filed: January 20, 2010

19

20

21

Behalf of WACHOVIA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

V.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO

AMENDED COMPLAINT

22 G. KENNEDY THOMPSON; THOMAS J.

WURTZ; HERBERT SANDLER; MARION

23 SANDLER; JOHN T. CASTEEN, III;

JOSEPH NEUBAUER; MARYELLEN C.

24 HERRINGER; TIMOTHY D. PROCTOR;

VAN L. RICHEY; DONA DAVIS YOUNG;

25 ERNEST S. RADY; JERRY GITT; JOHN D.

BAKER, II; PETER C. BROWNING;

26 DONALD M. JAMES; JOHN C.

WHITTAKER, JR.; WILLIAM H.

27 GOODWIN, JR.; ROBERT A. INGRAM;

MACKEY J. MCDONALD; RUTH G.

28 SHAW; LANTY L. SMITH; JOHN S.

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXT TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPL 10-CV-00279PJH

Case 4:10-cv-00279-YGR Document 29 Filed 06/01/10 Page 1 of 7
HOWARD

RICE

NEMEROVSKI

CANADY

FALK

& RABKIN

Perymlorta

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the complaint on January 10, 2010;

WHEREAS, in a stipulation filed on March 11, 2010, Plaintiff's counsel represented

that they intended to file an amended complaint and agreed that no response to the existing

complaint would be required earlier than thirty (30) days after the filing of such amended

complaint;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the amended complaint on April 21, 2010 and counsel have

been working diligently to obtain consent to accept service on behalf of the thirty-six (36)

named parties; and

WHEREAS, as reflected in the signature blocks below, counsel for thirty-two (32) of

the thirty-five (35) individual defendants and counsel for nominal defendant Wells Fargo &

Company have accepted service of the amended complaint or are authorized to accept

service, and efforts are underway to find legal representation for the remaining three (3)

individual defendants;

WHEREAS, in the interests of judicial economy and in order to avoid unnecessary

legal expenses and potentially duplicative motion practice, the parties have agreed that all

defendants should have one coordinated date to respond to the amended complaint;

THEREFORE, these parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record,

hereby agree and stipulate to the following:

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXT TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPL 10-CV-00279PJH

-1-

CHEN; LLOYD H. DEAN; SUSAN E.

ENGEL; ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ, JR.;

RICHARD D. MCCORMICK; CYNTHIA H.

MULLIGAN; NICHOLAS G. MOORE;

PHILIP J. QUIGLEY; DONALD B. RICE;

JUDITH M. RUNSTAD; STEPHEN W.

SANGER; ROBERT K. STEEL; JOHN G.

STUMPF; and SUSAN G. SWENSEN,

Defendants,

and

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,

Nominal Defendant.

Case 4:10-cv-00279-YGR Document 29 Filed 06/01/10 Page 2 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

HOWARD

RICE

NEMEROVSKI

CANADY

FA1K

RABKIN

PmfeuMnal Corporator:

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GILBERT R. SERO'TA

SARAH A. GOOD

FRANK Z. LaFORGE

HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY

FALK & RABKIN

A Professional Corporation

Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-4024

DATED: May 21, 2010.

1. All defendants shall have until July 16, 2010 to answer, move or otherwise respond

to the amended complaint.

2. To the extent any defendant moves against the amended complaint by motion to

dismiss, motion for summary judgment or otherwise, the parties shall meet and

confer and determine an appropriate briefing and hearing schedule, subject to the

Court's approval.

3. To the extent that any defendant raises any issue of fact in any motion addressed to

the amended complaint, plaintiff reserves the right to seek appropriate discovery

with respect thereto, and defendants reserve the right to oppose any such discovery,

including any discovery propounded prior to the Court's determination of plaintiff s

standing to sue.

4. This Stipulation is without prejudice to any objections or defenses that any

defendant may have to the amended complaint, or to plaintiffs standing to assert

any or all of the claims set forth therein.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

By: /s/ Sarah A. Good 

SARAH A. GOOD

Attorneys for Defendant

JOHN S. CHEN, LLOYD H. DEAN, SUSAN E.

ENGEL, ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ, JR.,

RICHARD D. McCORMICK, CYNTHIA H.

MULLIGAN, NICHOLAS G. MOORE, PHILIP J.

QUIGLEY, DONALD B. RICE, JUDITH M.

RUNSTAD, STEPHEN W. SANGER, JOHN G.

STUMPF, and SUSAN G. SWENSON

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXT TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPL 10-CV-00279PJH

-2-

Case 4:10-cv-00279-YGR Document 29 Filed 06/01/10 Page 3 of 7
1 DATED: May 21, 2010. JONATHAN C. DICKEY

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

2 200 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10166-0193

3

REBECCA JUSTICE LAZARUS

4 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000

5 San Francisco, CA 94105-2933

6

By: /s/ Rebecca Justice Lazarus

7 REBECCA JUSTICE LAZAZRUS

8 Attorneys for Defendants

JOHN T. CASTEEN, MARYELLEN C.

9 HERRINGER, JOSEPH NEUBAUER, TIMOTHY

D. PROCTOR, VAN L. RICHEY, DONA DAVIS

10

11

YOUNG, ERNEST S. RADY, JERRY GITT,

JOHN D. BAKER, II, PETER C. BROWNING,

DONALD M. JAMES, JOHN C. WHITAKER, JR.,

WILLIAM H. GOODWIN, ROBERT A.

12 INGRAM, MACKEY J. McDONALD, RUTH G.

SHAW and LANTY L. SMITH

HOWARD 13

RICE

NEMEROVSKI

CANADY

FALK I 

4 DATED: May 21, 2010. JEROME C. ROTH

A ',oft...nuI Cosynroulon

& RABKIN MUNGER TOLLES & OLSEN LLP

560 Mission Street, 27th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

DATED: May 21, 2010.

By: /s/ Jerome C. Roth 

JEROME C. ROTH

Attorneys for Defendants

HERBERT AND MARION SANDLER

THOMAS 0. JACOB

OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY

45 Fremont Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

By: /s/ Thomas 0. Jacob 

.THOMAS 0. JACOB

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXT TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPL 10-CV-00279PJH

-3-

Case 4:10-cv-00279-YGR Document 29 Filed 06/01/10 Page 4 of 7
1 DATED: May 21, 2010. RICHARD D. GREENFIELD

MARGUERITE R. GOODMAN

2 GREENFIELD & GOODMAN, LLC

250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor

3 New York, NY 10013

4 JAMES E. MILLER

KAREN M. LESER-GRENON

5 SHEPHERD FINKELMAN MILLER & SHAH LLP

65 Main Street

6 Chester, CT 06412

7 ROSE F. LUZON

SHEPHERD FINKELMAN MILLER & SHAH LLP

8 401 West A Street, Suite 2350

San Diego, CA 92101

9

10 By: Is/Richard D. Greenfield

RICHARD D. GREENFIELD

11 Attorneys for Plaintiff

12 J.N. FEUER

HOWARD 13

RICE

NENIEROVSKI

CANADY

FALK

RABKIN

1 4

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

---- 15 DATED: , 2010.

16

17 JUDGE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

18

19

20

21

22

- 23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXT TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPL 10-CV-00279PJH

-4-

June 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:10-cv-00279-YGR Document 29 Filed 06/01/10 Page 5 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

HOWARD 13

RICE

NEMEROVSKI

CANADY 4

FALK 1

& RABKIN

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Bonnie Hastings, declare:

I am a resident of the State of California and over the age of eighteen years and not a party to

the within-entitled action; my business address is Three Embarcadero Center, Seventh Floor, San

Francisco, California 94111-4024. On May 21, 2010, I served the following document(s) described

as STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS

TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT:

- by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set

1-1 forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m.

- by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully

I-1 prepaid, in the United States mail at San Francisco, California addressed as set forth

below.

by transmitting via email the document(s) listed above to the email address(es) set forth

1-1 below on this date before 5:00 p.m.

by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed Federal Express envelope and

affixing a pre-paid air bill, and causing the envelope to be delivered to a Federal

Express agent for delivery.

U

by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the

Uaddress(es) set forth below.

JONATHAN C. DICKEY

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10166-0193

REBECCA JUSTICE LAZARUS

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000

San Francisco, CA 94105-2933

Attorneys for Defendants

JOHN T. CASTEEN, MARYELLEN C.

HERRINGER, JOSEPH NEUBAUER,

TIMOTHY D. PROCTOR, VAN L.

RICHEY, DONA DAVIS YOUNG,

ERNEST S. RADY, JERRY GITT, JOHN

D. BAKER, II, PETER C. BROWNING,

DONALD M. JAMES, JOHN C.

WHITAKER, JR., WILLIAM H.

GOODWIN, ROBERT A. INGRAM,

MACKEY J. McDONALD, RUTH G.

SHAW and LANTY L. SMITH

PROOF OF SERVICE

Case 4:10-cv-00279-YGR Document 29 Filed 06/01/10 Page 6 of 7
THOMAS 0. JACOB

OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY

45 Fremont Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

JEROME C. ROTH

MUNGER TOLLES & OLSEN LLP

560 Mission Street, 27th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

1

2

3

4

Attorneys for Defendants

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant HERBERT AND MARION SANDLER

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY

5

I am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for

mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day

with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of

the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more

than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is

true and correct. Executed at San Francisco, California on May 21, 2010.

orou 

Bonnie Hastings

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

HOWARD 13

RICE

NEMEROVSKI

CANADY 14

FALK

& RABK1N

A ProfMosal Colwarlon 15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

PROOF OF SERVICE

Case 4:10-cv-00279-YGR Document 29 Filed 06/01/10 Page 7 of 7