Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-01598/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-01598-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM GUY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-00-1598 LKK EFB P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 17, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:00-cv-01598-LKK -EFB Document 59 Filed 08/31/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 17, 2006 are adopted in full;

2. Defendant’s February 3, 2006, motion to dismiss is granted in part and the

following claims are dismissed without prejudice: that defendants Ybarra and Phillips violated

plaintiff’s rights by refusing to cell-feed plaintiff; defendants Hooper and Haferkamp delayed

access to medical care after plaintiff fell from his bunk; Hooper and Haferkamp denied plaintiff

adequate medical treatment in January and February 2000; defendant Markey delayed plaintiff’s

receipt of medical care by improperly processing plaintiff’s administrative appeal; defendant

Phillips knew on January 6, 2000, that plaintiff had a serious medical condition but inadequately

responded to plaintiff’s request for treatment; Phillips wrote a disciplinary report that was false

with respect to plaintiff’s involvement in a cell fight; Phillips, Orr, Johnson and Roberts

retaliated against plaintiff for filing an appeal complaining about inadequate medical treatment;

Hooper, Roberts and Iwanek made a false report February 11, 2000, stating plaintiff disobeyed

medical orders so as to cover for their delay in providing plaintiff medical treatment; defendants

Culverson and Hooper conspired with each other and with medical staff to retaliate against

plaintiff for filing an appeal related to the false disciplinary reports by preparing a chrono

containing false information; Hooper, Markey, Rosario, Pliler and Depue delayed in processing

an administrative appeal, untruthfully responded to plaintiff’s appeals complaining of delayed

medical care and did not process plaintiff’s citizen’s complaint asserting medical staff delayed

treatment and failed to prescribe stronger pain medication; defendant Kirshner improperly

processed plaintiff’s complaints. 

3. Defendants’ February 3, 2006, motion to be dismiss is denied as to plaintiff’s

claim that defendant Orr failed to obtain immediate medical treatment for plaintiff on December

2, 6, and 8, 1999, after plaintiff fell from his bunk; and,

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:00-cv-01598-LKK -EFB Document 59 Filed 08/31/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

4. Within thirty days from the date of this order defendant Orr shall file and serve

an answer to the May 22, 2001 amended complaint. 

DATED: August 30, 2006.

Case 2:00-cv-01598-LKK -EFB Document 59 Filed 08/31/06 Page 3 of 3