Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506-42/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY BOWOTO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION,

et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 99-02506 SI

AMENDED

ORDER RE: DISPOSITIVE MOTION

SCHEDULE

The Court, having considered the letter briefs submitted by the parties, and for good cause

shown, hereby ORDERS that:

1. The schedule for dispositive motions shall be as follows:

Motion(s) Opposition Reply Hearing

Act of State cross motions

and defendants’ Motion for

U.S. Statement of Interest

10/27/06 11/10/06 11/17/06 12/01/06

ATS claim 10/20/06 11/29/06 12/22/06 1/12/07

RICO claim 10/27/06 12/08/06 1/05/07 1/19/07

State/Nigerian law claims 11/10/06 12/22/06 1/26/07 2/09/07

Tertiary Liability 11/22/06 1/12/07 2/02/07 2/16/07

2. In accordance with this Court’s August 29, 2006 Order (Docket No. 1212), if the parties wish

the Court to hear the previously-briefed Act of State cross motions or Motion for U.S. Statement of

Interest (Docket Nos. 811, 812, 1033), they must renotice them with the Court. If the parties intend to

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1269 Filed 10/23/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

rely on the same materials submitted in support of the original motions, they may file a short statement

to that effect. To the extent the parties rely on the same materials, they need not submit new copies to

chambers.

3. The dates for the final pretrial conference and trial are hereby vacated, to be reset at a later

date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 23, 2006 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 1269 Filed 10/23/06 Page 2 of 2