Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00917/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00917-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARIN GREENE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0917 MCE DAD P

vs.

SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

 /

Plaintiff is a former inmate of the Claybank facility of the Solano County Jail and

is currently incarcerated in state prison. He is proceeding with counsel on claims brought under 

the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§

2000cc et seq. , under the First, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, and under California Penal

Code § 4027. 

On July 24, 2006, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations

recommending that defendant Rourk’s motion for summary judgment be granted and that the

action be dismissed. The findings and recommendations were adopted by the assigned District

Judge on September 18, 2006. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the

granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant Rourk in all respects and remanded the

matter to this court for further proceedings on all of plaintiff’s claims. 

Case 2:04-cv-00917-MCE -DAD Document 88 Filed 04/02/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule

16-240, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial scheduling) Conference is set for May 2, 2008, at 10:00 a.m.

in Courtroom 27 before the undersigned. Counsel for the parties may appear telephonically. To

arrange telephonic appearance, counsel shall contact Pete Buzo, the courtroom deputy of the

undersigned, at (916) 930-4128 no later than three days prior to the status conference.

2. Within seven days prior to the status conference, the parties are required to

submit to the court and serve upon the opposing counsel a status report which sets out their views

on the following matters:

 a. Future proceedings, including the scheduling of a pretrial conference and

trial;

 b. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the

relative simplicity or complexity of the action or proceedings;

 c. Whether this matter is to be tried before this court or the district court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636(c);

 d. Whether counsel will stipulate to the trial judge acting as settlement judge

and waiving any disqualifications by virtue of his so acting, or whether counsel prefers to have a

Settlement Conference before another judge;

 e. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this

matter.

3. Counsels are reminded of their continuing duty to notify the court immediately

of any settlement or other disposition of the action. See Local Rule 16-160.

DATED: April 1, 2008.

DAD:4

gree0917.remd

Case 2:04-cv-00917-MCE -DAD Document 88 Filed 04/02/08 Page 2 of 2