Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01488/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01488-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY FRANCIS O’LEARY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01488-LJO-GSA PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED

UNDER SECTION 1983

(Docs. 15 and 16)

Plaintiff GaryFrancis O’Leary(“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 13, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed aFindings and Recommendations herein which

was served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objection was to be filed

within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Objection on April 26, 2007.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Although Plaintiff filed

an Objection, Plaintiff did not address the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations, and

did not set forth any grounds that would support allowing this action to proceed.

///

 ///

Case 1:06-cv-01488-LJO-GSA Document 20 Filed 07/01/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 13, 2007, is adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted under section 1983.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 1, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01488-LJO-GSA Document 20 Filed 07/01/08 Page 2 of 2