Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_98-cv-01493/USCOURTS-caed-2_98-cv-01493-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Concurrently with his objections, plaintiff filed another, identical motion to vacate, the merits of which

are addressed in the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, plaintiff’s second motion to

vacate will similarly be denied.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN V. APOLLO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-98-1493 LKK CMK 

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

 On May27, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

recommending plaintiff’s motion to vacate filed April 18, 2005, be denied. Plaintiff,

subsequently, filed objections to these findings and recommendations.1 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

Case 2:98-cv-01493-LKK -CMK Document 133 Filed 08/11/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis. The court has determined that there is no need to modify the findings and

recommendations based on the points raised in petitioner’s objections.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 27, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motions to vacate filed on April 18, 2005 and June 6, 2005, are

denied.

DATED: August 10, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

Case 2:98-cv-01493-LKK -CMK Document 133 Filed 08/11/05 Page 2 of 2