Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00521/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00521-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER EVAN VANDERWERFF,

Plaintiff,

 v.

K. ALLISON, et al.,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:13-cv-00521-LJO-BAM (PC)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Christopher Evan Vanderwerff (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se 

and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated 

this action on February 13, 2013. 

On April 25, 2014, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim, 

with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e). Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with 

the order, this action would be dismissed for failure to state a claim. 

The deadline for Plaintiff to file his amended complaint has passed and Plaintiff has not 

complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on 

file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. 

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), IT IS HEREBY 

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to state any claims 

upon which relief may be granted. 

Case 1:13-cv-00521-LJO-BAM Document 17 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District 

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(l). Within 

fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file 

written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 6, 2014 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00521-LJO-BAM Document 17 Filed 06/06/14 Page 2 of 2