Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01268/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01268-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA2:812404.4

STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND 

CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES

CASE NO. CV 04-1268 VRW

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304)

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-3305

Telephone: (415) 984-8700

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701

MARK C. SCARSI (S.B. #183926)

RYAN K. YAGURA (S.B. #197619)

GUANG MING WHITLEY (S.B. #235124)

O'Melveny & Myers LLP

400 South Hope Street

Los Angeles, California 90071-2899

Telephone: (213) 430-6000

Facsimile: (213) 430-6407

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant MONOLITHIC 

SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, INC.

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

Edward Reines (CA Bar No. 135960)

Paul T. Ehrlich (CA Bar No. 228543)

Brandon D. Conard (CA Bar No. 234824)

201 Redwood Shores Parkway

Redwood Shores, CA 94065

Telephone: (650) 802-3000

Facsimile: (650) 802-3100

Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING

COMPANY, LTD. And TSMC NORTH AMERICA

SUSMAN GODFREY LLP

Ian B. Crosby (admitted pro hac vice)

Max L. Tribble (admitted pro hac vice)

Joseph S. Grinstein (admitted pro hac vice) 

1000 Louisiana Street

Houston, Texas 77002-5096

Telephone: (713) 651-9366

Facsimile: (713) 654-6666

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

UniRAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 267 Filed 10/11/06 Page 1 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA2:812404.4 - 2 -

STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND 

CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES

CASE NO. CV 04-1268 VRW

UNIRAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Plaintiffs,

v.

MONOLITHIC SYSTEM 

TECHNOLOGY, INC.; TAIWAN 

SEMICONDUCTOR 

MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD.; 

and TSMC NORTH AMERICA,

Defendants.

Case No. CV 04-1268 VRW

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT 

DEADLINES

WHEREAS, the Stipulated Motion and Order to Amend Pretrial Discovery 

Deadlines, Docket No. 192, and the Joint Case Management Statement and 

[Proposed] Order, Docket No. 195, provide the following case management 

deadlines:

EVENT DATE

Fact Discovery Cut-Off October 13, 2006

Expert Reports by Party with Burden of Proof October 27, 2006

Rebuttal Expert Reports November 27, 2006

Expert Discovery Cut-Off December 15, 2006

Last Day to File Dispositive Motions January 11, 2007

Dispositive Motion Hearing February 15, 2007

Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Order April 9, 2007

Pretrial Conference May 8, 2007

WHEREAS, the Civil Minute Order, Docket No. 198, requires UniRAM 

Technology, Inc. to “pare down its number of alleged trade secrets from 212 to 12 

by October 20, 2006.”

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 267 Filed 10/11/06 Page 2 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA2:812404.4 - 3 -

STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND 

CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES

CASE NO. CV 04-1268 VRW

WHEREAS, the parties (UniRAM Technology, Inc., Monolithic System 

Technology, Inc. (“MoSys”), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, 

Ltd., and TSMC North America) are working towards completing fact discovery;

WHEREAS, the parties are in need of two additional weeks for fact 

discovery to conclude depositions of already requested party witnesses and 

subpoenaed third parties;

WHEREAS, UniRAM is in need of an additional week to pare down its 

number of alleged trade secrets from 212 to 12;

WHEREAS, the parties wish to modify the current case management 

schedule to allow for two additional weeks of fact depositions and to provide 

UniRAM with an additional week to pare down its number of alleged trade secrets 

from 212 to 12;

WHEREAS, the parties’ proposed modification will not impact the trial date 

in this action;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN 

THE PARTIES HERETO, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL AND 

SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, AS FOLLOWS:

EVENT DATE

UniRAM shall pare down its number of alleged 

trade secrets from 212 to 12.

October 27, 2006

Fact Discovery Cut-Off for Depositions of 

Already Requested Party Witnesses and 

Subpoenaed Third Parties

October 27, 2006

Expert Reports by Party with Burden of Proof November 8, 2006

Rebuttal Expert Reports December 8, 2006

Expert Discovery Cut-Off December 22, 2006

Last Day to File Dispositive Motions January 26, 2007

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 267 Filed 10/11/06 Page 3 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA2:812404.4 - 4 -

STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND 

CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES

CASE NO. CV 04-1268 VRW

Dispositive Motion Hearing March 1, 2007 at 2:00 pm

Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Order April 9, 2007

Pretrial Conference May 8, 2007 at 9:00am

DATED:_October 6, 2006 SUSMAN GODFREY LLP

By:____ ___/s/____________

Ian B. Crosby

Max L. Tribble

Joseph S. Grinstein

Attorneys for Plaintiff, UniRAM 

Technology, Inc.

DATED:_October 6, 2006 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By:______/s/____________

Mark C. Scarsi

Ryan K. Yagura

Guang Ming Whitley

Attorneys for Defendant, Monolithic System

Technology, Inc.

DATED:_October 6, 2006 WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

By:____/s/____________

Edward Reines

Paul T. Ehrlich

Brandon D. Conard

Attorneys for Defendants, TSMC Ltd. and

TSMC North America

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 267 Filed 10/11/06 Page 4 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA2:812404.4 - 5 -

STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND 

CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES

CASE NO. CV 04-1268 VRW

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

DATED:_______________ __________________________________

 Honorable Vaughn R. Walker

 United States District Judge

10/11/2006

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 267 Filed 10/11/06 Page 5 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C-04-01268 VRW

DECLARATION OF GUANG MING 

WHITLEY RE SIGNATURE PURSUANT TO 

GENERAL ORDER 45 § X

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304)

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-3305

Telephone: (415) 984-8700

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701

MARK C. SCARSI (S.B. #183926)

RYAN K. YAGURA (S.B. #197619)

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

400 South Hope Street

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899

Telephone: (213) 430-6000

Facsimile: (213) 430-6407

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MONOLITHIC SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, 

INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UniRAM TECHNOLOGY, INC., a 

California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

MONOLITHIC SYSTEM 

TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; TAIWAN 

SEMICONDUCTOR 

MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 

LTD., a Taiwan corporation; and TSMC 

NORTH AMERICA, a California 

corporation,

 

Defendants.

Case No. CV-04-01268 VRW

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING

DECLARATION OF GUANG MING 

WHITLEY RE: SIGNATURE 

PURSUANT TO GENERAL 

ORDER 45 § X

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 267 Filed 10/11/06 Page 6 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C-04-01268 VRW - 2 -

DECLARATION OF GUANG MING

WHITLEY RE SIGNATURE PURSUANT TO 

GENERAL ORDER 45 § X

I, GUANG MING WHITLEY, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney at the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers LLP, 

counsel of record for Monolithic System Technology, Inc., in the above-styled action 

pending before this Court. I am a member of good standing of the State Bar of California 

and am admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration and, if 

called as a witness, could and would testify competently to such facts under oath.

2. I attest that the conformed signatures of Ian Crosby, counsel for 

UniRAM Technology, Inc., and Edward Reines, counsel for Taiwan Semiconductor 

Manufacturing Company, Ltd. and TSMC North America, appearing in the signature 

block of the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Amend Case Management Deadlines, are 

the respective signatures of Mr. Crosby and Mr. Reines, and that Mr. Crosby and Mr. 

Reines have authorized me to file the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Amend Case 

Management Deadlines.

Executed on the 6th day of October, 2006, at Los Angeles, California. I 

declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 

true and correct. 

 /s/

 Guang Ming Whitley

LA2:813085.1

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 267 Filed 10/11/06 Page 7 of 7