Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04393/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04393-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1365 Environmental Matters

---

GROSS 

&

KLEIN LLP

THE 

EMBARCADERO

PIER 9, SUITE 100

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

G

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT, TO STRIKE AND FOR SANCTIONS AND EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND 

REPLY THERETO; [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 14-cv-04393-WHO

STUART G. GROSS (#251019)

sgross@grosskleinlaw.com

TIMOTHY S. KLINE (#319227)

tk@grosskleinlaw.com

GROSS & KLEIN LLP

The Embarcadero

Pier 9, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

t (415) 671-4628

f (415) 480-6688

Attorneys for Plaintiff Dan Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DAN CLARKE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; and 

PG&E CORPORATION

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-04393-WHO

JOINT STIPULATION TO 

CONTINUE DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO 

STRIKE AND FOR SANCTIONS 

AND EXTEND TIME TO FILE 

OPPOSITION AND REPLY 

THERETO; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-04393-WHO Document 216 Filed 04/03/20 Page 1 of 3
GROSS 

&

KLEIN LLP

THE 

EMBARCADERO

PIER 9, SUITE 100

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

G

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT, TO STRIKE AND FOR SANCTIONS AND EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND 

REPLY THERETO; [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 14-cv-04393-WHO 1

RECITALS

WHEREAS, on March 18, 2020, Clarke filed his Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”);

WHEREAS, on April 1, 2020, PG&E filed a Motion to Dismiss Clarke’s SAC, to Strike 

and For Sanctions (“Motion to Dismiss”), and set a hearing for May 7, 2020;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Clarke’s opposition to the Motion to Dismiss

would be due on April 15, 2020, and PG&E’s reply would be due on April 22, 2020; and

WHEREAS, the Parties agree to a two-week extension of Clarke’s time to oppose the 

Motion to Dismiss and a one-week extension of PG&E’s time to reply; and

WHEREAS, the undersigned counsel for Defendants has consented to the undersigned 

counsel for Plaintiff signing the instant stipulation on his behalf.

NOW, THEREFORE, Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), the Parties stipulate and agree 

as follows, subject to the Court’s approval:

STIPULATION

1. Clarke will file his Opposition to PG&E’s Motion to Dismiss on or before April 29, 

2020;

2. PG&E will file its Reply in support of Motion to Dismiss on or before May 13, 2020;

3. The May 7, 2020 hearing on PG&E’s Motion to Dismiss is hereby continued to May 

28, 2020 at 10:30 a.m., or the Court’s next available date.

DATED: April 3, 2020 WFBM, LLP

By:__/s/ Scott D. Mroz_______________________

SCOTT D. MROZ

ATTORNEYS FOR PACIFIC GAS AND 

ELECTRIC COMPANY AND PG&E 

CORPORATION

Case 3:14-cv-04393-WHO Document 216 Filed 04/03/20 Page 2 of 3
GROSS 

&

KLEIN LLP

THE 

EMBARCADERO

PIER 9, SUITE 100

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

G

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT, TO STRIKE AND FOR SANCTIONS AND EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND 

REPLY THERETO; [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 14-cv-04393-WHO 2

DATED: April 3, 2020 GROSS & KLEIN LLP

By:__/s/ Stuart G. Gross____________________

STUART G. GROSS

ATTORNEYS FOR DAN CLARKE

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, as modified IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing will be 

on May 27, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

Dated: April 3, 2020 ______________________________________

The Honorable Judge William H. Orrick

Case 3:14-cv-04393-WHO Document 216 Filed 04/03/20 Page 3 of 3