Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02306/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02306-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1

REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Konrad L. Trope, Esq. SBN 133214

Novo Law Group, P.C.

University Towers

4199 Campus Drive, Suite 550

Irvine, California 92612

(949) 509-6531 (tel)

(949) 509-6532 (fax)

Attorneys for Plaintiff PACIFIC INFORMATION RESOURCES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PACIFIC INFORMATION RESOURCES,

INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

DIANA MUSSELMAN, et. al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-02306 MMC

[Before the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

Courtroom: 7]

REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Filing Date : March 31, 2006

Discovery Cut-Off Date: None

Trial Date: None

Rule 16 Conference : August 25, 2006

ORDER GRANTING

Case 3:06-cv-02306-MMC Document 18 Filed 08/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2

REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiff, PACIFIC INFORMATION RESOURCES, INC., through its counsel, and

subject to the approval of the Court, hereby request that the current Case Management

Conference be extended to a new date as determined by the Court.

Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court permit this continuance because on or about

August 22, 2006, all Defendants except for two, who are hiding, have been served with the

Complaint and the TRO application. Each Defendant was served with a 300-page stack and

continuing the date would allow time for the Defendants to retain counsel and each attorney to

become more familiar with the case.

Indeed, by this Friday, August 25, 2006, Plaintiff’s counsel expects that some, if not all of

the Defendants, will have filed oppositions to the pending application for TRO. Thus, a

continuance will enable the parties to “make their appearances” and possibly enable the court to

schedule a meaningful OSC Re: Preliminary Injunction combined with the Case Management

Conference.

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: August 22, 2006 NOVO LAW GROUP, P.C.

BY: /s/

Konrad L. Trope, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff PACIFIC

INFORMATION RESOURCES, INC.

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE. The new Case Management Conference will be set for _______________.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________ By:________________________________

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

December 15, 2006, at

10:30 a.m.; a joint statement shall be filed by December 8,

2006. Plaintiff shall immediately serve this order on all

defendants as to whom plaintiff has accomplished service.

August 23, 2006

Case 3:06-cv-02306-MMC Document 18 Filed 08/23/06 Page 2 of 2