Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01393/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01393-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY TO 

BE TAKEN AFTER THE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

 Christopher S. Yates (SBN 161273) 

 Christopher B. Campbell (SBN 254776) 

 Brittany N. Lovejoy (SBN 286813) 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111-6538 

Telephone: 415.391.0600 

Facsimile: 415.395.8095 

Email: chris.yates@lw.com

 christopher.campbell@lw.com

 brittany.lovejoy@lw.com

ORACLE CORPORATION 

 Dorian Daley (SBN 129049) 

 Deborah K. Miller (SBN 95527) 

500 Oracle Parkway 

M/S 5op7 

Redwood City, CA 94065 

Telephone: 650.506.4846 

Facsimile: 650.506.7114 

Email: dorian.daley@oracle.com deborah.miller@oracle.com

ORACLE CORPORATION 

 Jeffrey S. Ross (SBN 138172) 

10 Van de Graaff Drive 

Burlington, MA 01803 

Telephone: 781.744.0449 

Facsimile: 781.238.6273 

Email: jeff.ross@oracle.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Oracle America, Inc., and Oracle 

International Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; ORACLE INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, a California corporation 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 

1–50, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01393-JST 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY TO BE 

TAKEN AFTER THE FACT 

DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 352 Filed 10/03/17 Page 1 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY TO 

BE TAKEN AFTER THE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, non-party BP America, Inc. (“BP”) recently brought a motion for a 

protective order against the deposition subpoena issued by plaintiffs Oracle America Inc. and 

Oracle International Corporation (collectively, “Oracle”) and, on August 25, 2017, Magistrate 

Judge Laporte ordered BP to present its designee under Rule 30(b)(6) for deposition no later than 

October 2, 2017. (See Dkt. No. 324); 

WHEREAS, in light of the circumstances surrounding Hurricane Harvey, which 

impacted BP’s operations in Houston, Texas, BP requested, and Oracle has stipulated to, a 

continuance of the deposition to October 5, 2017 instead. (See Dkt. No. 331); 

WHEREAS, Oracle has served both document and deposition subpoenas on third parties 

ON Semiconductor (“ON Semi”) and Charter Communications (“Charter”), however discovery 

into these customers will need to be completed shortly after the existing fact discovery deadline 

to accommodate those third-parties and their schedules, including significant unanticipated 

difficulties those non-parties have encountered gathering documents responsive to Oracle’s 

subpoenas; 

WHEREAS, HPE has served both document and deposition subpoenas on third-party 

Gartner Inc. that Gartner Inc. has indicated cannot be completed before October 2, 2017 due to 

extenuating circumstances; 

WHEREAS, Oracle has requested the deposition of HPE employee Gary Olsen, for 

whom HPE has not yet identified a deposition date; 

WHEREAS, HPE has requested the deposition of Oracle employee Samuel Chan, who 

Oracle contends is not available for deposition until October 19, 2017; 

WHEREAS, HPE has subpoenaed for deposition former Oracle employee Miriam 

Wagner, who Oracle contends is not available for deposition until October 3, 2017; 

WHEREAS, Oracle has requested the deposition of former HPE employee Phillip 

Whitaker, that deposition has not yet been scheduled, and Oracle and HPE enter into this 

stipulation without prejudice to Oracle’s right to seek relief with respect to Mr. Whitaker’s 

deposition, including the ability to depose Mr. Whitaker after the close of discovery, or HPE’s or 

Mr. Whitaker’s right to oppose, on any ground, any such relief Oracle might seek; 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 352 Filed 10/03/17 Page 2 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY TO 

BE TAKEN AFTER THE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties stipulate that this agreement will not be used by either side as a 

basis to extend discovery for any other reason; neither party currently anticipates or has proposed 

extending the fact discovery cutoff for any reason, however both sides reserve their right to move 

to compel discovery in the time period allotted under Local Rule 37-3; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court order that 

the following exceptions be permitted to the October 2, 2017 fact discovery cutoff: 

(i) Oracle’s deposition of BP shall take place on October 5, 2017. 

(ii) ON Semi and Charter’s document production and depositions may be allowed to 

take place after October 2, 2017, but no later than October 20, 2017. 

(iii) Gartner Inc.’s document production and deposition may be allowed to take place 

after October 2, 2017, but no later than October 20, 2017. 

(iv) Oracle’s deposition of Gary Olsen may be allowed to take place after October 2, 

2017, but no later than October 20, 2017. 

(v) HPE’s deposition of Samuel Chan may be allowed to take place on October 19, 

2017. 

(vi) HPE’s deposition of Miriam Wagner may be allowed to take place on October 3, 

2017. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 2, 2017 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

By: /s/ Christopher S. Yates 

Christopher S. Yates 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Oracle America, Inc. and 

Oracle International Corporation 

Dated: October 2, 2017 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By: /s/ Joseph Gorman 

Joseph Gorman 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company 

/// 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 352 Filed 10/03/17 Page 3 of 4
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY TO 

BE TAKEN AFTER THE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: By: 

THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

I, Christopher S. Yates, am the ECF User whose identification and password are 

being used to file the foregoing letter. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, 

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 

Dated: October 2, 2017 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

By: /s/ Christopher S. Yates 

Christopher S. Yates 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Oracle America, Inc. and 

Oracle International Corporation 

October 3, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 352 Filed 10/03/17 Page 4 of 4