Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00490/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00490-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROYCE A. PEARSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0490 LKK CMK P

vs.

C.E. FINN, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis brings this

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302(c)(17). 

By order filed March 1, 2006, the court issued an order dismissing the operative

complaint for failure to state a claim and directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint within

thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 

In the March 1, 2006 order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his

complaint and dismissed the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to state a claim

upon which relief could be granted. Because plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, the

court recommends dismissal of the claims made in the original complaint for failure to state a

claim upon which the court could grant relief. See Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1448 (9th Cir.

Case 2:05-cv-00490-LKK -CMK Document 14 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1987) (prisoner must be given notice of deficiencies and opportunity to amend prior to dismissing

for failure to state a claim). 

Based on the foregoing, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 25, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00490-LKK -CMK Document 14 Filed 05/26/06 Page 2 of 2