Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00689/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00689-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEAN-PIERRE K. THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

BONILLA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:08-CV-00689-LJO-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(DOC. 86)

Plaintiff Jean-Pierre K. Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants

Bonilla and Garcia for violation of the Eighth Amendment. On November 4, 2010, Plaintiff filed

a motion for summary judgment against Defendant Bonilla. Doc. 47. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 9, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within fourteen days. Doc. 86. Plaintiff filed an Objection

to the Findings and Recommendations on September 21, 2011. Doc. 88.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

1

Case 1:08-cv-00689-JLT Document 89 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 9, 2011, is adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed November 4, 2010, is denied without

prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 260(a) and Rule 56(c) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure; and

3. The dispositive motion deadline for all parties is March 22, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-00689-JLT Document 89 Filed 09/27/11 Page 2 of 2