Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01203/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01203-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK ANTHONY BALDIZAN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05- 1203 MCE GGH P

vs.

EDWARD ALAMEIDA, et al., 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Rather than file a joint scheduling statement pursuant to the court’s order filed on

July 12, 2005, the parties filed separate scheduling statements on August 11, 2005. Counsel are

cautioned to comply fully with any order of this court in future. After reviewing the separate 

statements, the court issues the following ORDERS:

1. Should petitioner elect to proceed on an amended petition of exhausted claims 

only, the amended petition must be filed by November 9, 2005 along with any memorandum of

points and authorities; if such an amended petition is filed and served, respondent must file an

answer or dispositive motion within 30 days thereafter; petitioner must file any reply or

opposition, as appropriate, within 30 days of service of respondent’s responsive pleading; if

respondent filed a motion, respondent will have 15 days after service of an opposition to file a

reply. 

\\\\\ 

Case 2:05-cv-01203-MCE -GGH Document 16 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Should petitioner identify unexhausted claims which petitioner will seek to

exhaust, petitioner shall file an amended petition, by November 9, 2005, setting forth all claims,

exhausted and unexhausted, and shall demonstrate good cause for having failed to exhaust state

court remedies as to any claim which petitioner would seek to exhaust. Petitioner shall move the

court to hold the proceedings in abeyance pending exhaustion of state court remedies as to the

unexhausted claims, by November 9, 2005; if a stay is ultimately granted, petitioner must

immediately pursue state court exhaustion, that is, within 30 days of the granting of a stay, and,

upon said exhaustion in state court, within 30 days, proceed upon the amended petition in federal

court.

3. Should respondent object to any motion for a stay of proceedings by petitioner

to pursue unexhausted claims, respondent must file any opposition to such a motion within 30

days of service thereof; thereafter, petitioner has 15 days to file any reply.

4. If petitioner intends to make a motion for leave to conduct discovery under the

Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 6(a), petitioner must do so by November 1, 2005; if

respondent opposes any such motion respondent must do so within 15 days thereafter;

petitioner’s reply, if any, must be filed within 7 days of any opposition by respondent.

5. If petitioner chooses to move for an evidentiary hearing, petitioner must do so

at the earliest appropriate opportunity; should petitioner file a motion for an evidentiary hearing,

and respondent oppose any such motion, respondent must file any opposition within 30 days of

service of the motion, and petitioner must file any reply within 15 days of service of any

opposition.

DATED: 10/12/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

bald1203.pst

Case 2:05-cv-01203-MCE -GGH Document 16 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2