Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01673/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01673-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM E. HUTCHISON, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-03-1673 LKK DAD PS

vs.

UNITED STATES FOREST 

SERVICE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On August 25, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiffs have

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

/////

Case 2:03-cv-01673-LKK -DAD Document 36 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 25, 2005, are adopted in full; 

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted and this action is

dismissed.

DATED: September 16, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/hutchison1673.jo

Case 2:03-cv-01673-LKK -DAD Document 36 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 2