Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-01141/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-01141-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OLEWASAMI BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C03-1141 TEH 

SCHEDULING ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to extend the time in which

his opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment may be filed. Having reviewed

the declaration of plaintiff’s counsel, the Court finds good cause to grant the motion.

Therefore, with GOOD CAUSE appearing, plaintiff’s opposition brief and supporting

papers shall be considered timely if filed on or before April 26, 2006. Defendants’ reply

papers shall be filed on or before May 10, 2006. The hearing on this matter shall be held at

10:00 a.m. on June 12, 2006.

Case 3:03-cv-01141-TEH Document 97 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Due to the delay in the summary judgment motion, the current trial date of June 6,

2006, and the pre-trial conference scheduled for May 30, 2006, shall be VACATED. The

Court shall hold a trial setting conference with counsel following the June12th hearing, with

the expectation that trial shall be held in September 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 24, 2006 

 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:03-cv-01141-TEH Document 97 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 2