Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00555/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00555-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEANDRE FOWLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

SCOTT JONES, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:20-cv-0555 JAM CKD P

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 

Local Rule 302.

On April 27, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the 

findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 

recommendations was returned by the U.S. Postal Service, plaintiff was properly served. It is the 

plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to 

Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

/////

Case 2:20-cv-00555-JAM-CKD Document 5 Filed 06/02/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having 

reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 

and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 27, 2020, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: June 1, 2020

/s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 2:20-cv-00555-JAM-CKD Document 5 Filed 06/02/20 Page 2 of 2