Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02792/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-02792-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY PASSER,

Plaintiff, No. 2:08-cv-2792 MCE KJN P

vs.

DR. STEEVERS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner who is proceeding without counsel or “pro se” and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On July 23, 2012, the court directed the United States Marshal to serve process on

defendants Alchek, Azevedo, Coleman, Mehta and Rosales, pursuant to plaintiff’s Second 1

Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 58). Defendants Mehta and Rosales have been served process

and appeared in this action. (Dkt. Nos. 64.) However, the United States Marshal was unable to

serve process on defendants Alchek, Azevedo and Coleman, due to inadequate service

information. 

////

 The Second Amended Complaint was previously served on defendants Burt, Gavia, 1

Sabin and Steevers, each of whom have appeared in this action.

1

Case 2:08-cv-02792-TLN-KJN Document 71 Filed 10/18/12 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

By order filed September 24, 2012, the court noted that process directed to

defendant Alchek was returned unserved because “defendant moved and left no address;” the

court directed plaintiff to provide additional service information. (Dkt. Nos. 61, 62.) The court

presently notes that the process directed to defendants Coleman and Azevedo were also returned

unserved because the correctional facility that plaintiff identified as their place of employment

was “unable to identify [either defendant] without [their] first name or initial.” (Dkt. Nos. 65,

66.) 

Plaintiff must now provide additional information to serve defendants Alchek,

Coleman and Azevedo. Plaintiff shall promptly seek such information through discovery, the 2

California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov’t. Code §§ 6250, et seq., or other means available to

plaintiff. If access to the required information is denied or unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may

seek judicial intervention.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff three USM-285 forms,

along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the Second Amended Complaint filed November

12, 2010 (Dkt. No. 41);

2. Within sixty days from the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and

submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following

documents:

a. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant (Alchek, Coleman and

Azevedo); 

b. Four copies of the endorsed Second Amended Complaint filed November 12,

2010 (Dkt. No. 41); and

 The 60-day deadline for providing service information for defendant Alchek, pursuant 2

to the court’s order filed September 24, 2012 (Dkt. No. 62), is hereby extended to be the same as

the 60-day deadline for providing service information for defendants Coleman and Azevedo.

2

Case 2:08-cv-02792-TLN-KJN Document 71 Filed 10/18/12 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

c. One completed summons form (if not previously provided) or show good cause

why plaintiff cannot provide such information.

SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 17, 2012

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

pass2792.8e(2)

3

Case 2:08-cv-02792-TLN-KJN Document 71 Filed 10/18/12 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY PASSER,

Plaintiff, No. 2:08-cv-2792 MCE KJN P 

vs.

DR. STEEVERS, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 completed summons form

 completed USM-285 forms

 copies of the November 12, 2010 Second Amended Complaint

 

Date Plaintiff

Case 2:08-cv-02792-TLN-KJN Document 71 Filed 10/18/12 Page 4 of 4