Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02361/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02361-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

383764.01

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

JEFFREYR. CHANIN - #103649

DARL YN J. DUR - #169825

ASHOK RAANI - #200020

710 Sansome Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704

Telephone: (415) 391-5400

4 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188

Email: jrc~kvn.com

djd~kvn.com

axr~kvn.com

1

2

3

5

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-defendant,

7 NETFLIX, INC.

8 ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAAN LLP

Marshall B. Grossman (No. 35958)

9 Wiliam J. O'Brien (No. 99526)

Tony D. Chen (No. 176635)

10 DominiqueN. Thomas (No. 231464)

The Water Garden

11 1620 26th Street

Fourth Floor, North Tower

12 Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060

Telephone: 310-907-1000

13 Facsimile: 310-907-2000

Email: mgrossman~agsk.com

14 wobrien~agsk.com

tchen~agsk.com

15 dthomas~agsk.com

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant,

16 Blockbuster Inc.

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

Case No. C 06 2361 WHA

STIPULATION REQUESTING

WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES

#68, 69, AND 70

Complaint filed: April 4, 2006

v.

BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware

corporation, DOES 1-50,

Defendant.

AN RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

?R

STIPULATION REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES #68, 69, AND 70

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 86 Filed 11/06/06 Page 1 of 3
1 WHEREAS, on Friday, November 3, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-defendant Netflix, Inc.

2 inadvertently filed Docket Entries #68 (entitled "PlaintiffNetflx, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and

3 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Motion to Compel Production of

4 Documents from Blockbuster, Inc."), #69 (entitled "Declaration of Eugene M. Paige in Support

5 ofNetflix's Motion to Compel"), and #70 ("(Proposed) Order on Netflx's Motion to Compel the

6 Production of Documents from Blockbuster, Inc.");

7 WHEREAS, a draft of Docket Entry #68, as opposed to the final version, was

8 inadvertentlye-filed;

9 WHEREAS, Docket Entries #69 and 70 relate to Docket Entry #68, and thus improperly

10 relate to a document fied in error;

11 WHEREAS, Netfix wil today fie the final version of Docket Entry #68 and re-fie

12 Docket Entries #69 and #70 to relate to that final version;

13 THEREFORE, both Netflx and Blockbuster hereby request that Docket Entres #68,69,

14 and 70 be withdrawn.

15

16

Dated: November 3,2006

17

18

19

20

Dated: November 3,2006

21

22

23

24

Respectfully submitted,

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

By: Isl Ashok Ramani

Attorneys For Plaintiff and Counterclaim

Defendant NETFLIX, INc.

Respectfully submitted,

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN

LLP

25

26

27

By: ti i II" q WI () '/3ìlVl,hr g

Attorneys For Defendant and

Counterclaimant BLOCKBUSTER INC.

?R

383764.01

1

STIPULATION REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES #68, 69, AND 70

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 86 Filed 11/06/06 Page 2 of 3
1 Pursuant to stipulation, IT is SO ORDERED.

383764.01

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Dated:

?R

By:

THE HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUGE

2

STIPULATION REQUESTING WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRIES #68, 69, AND 70

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA

November 6, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 86 Filed 11/06/06 Page 3 of 3