Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-03884/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-03884-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OSAHON OMOREGIE,

Plaintiff(s), No. C 07-3884 PJH

v. ORDER

BOARDWALK AUTO CENTER, INC., 

et al.,

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

To the extent that the court’s issuance of a formal clarification of its prior rulings in

response to a letter from plaintiff, has led plaintiff to believe that he is free to correspond at

will with the court, he is mistaken. Plaintiff’s letter dated June 30, 2008 and received by the

court on July 7, 2008, is STRICKEN. If plaintiff, or any other party, wishes to seek action

by the court, he must do so in accordance with the local rules – either by informal motion

for administrative relief (Civil Local Rule 7-11) or by formal motion (Civil Local Rule 7-2),

both of which afford defendants with an opportunity to respond before the court acts.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 8, 2008 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:07-cv-03884-PJH Document 116 Filed 07/08/08 Page 1 of 1