Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07073/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07073-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 340
Nature of Suit: Marine Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 05:0701 Maritime Subsidy Board

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\JLALL\CHAMBERS\CASES\CIVIL\06-7073\Order meet and confer.wpd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Clifton Marston,

Plaintiff,

v.

Matson Navigation Company,

Defendant.

________________________________/

No. C 06-7073 JL

ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER

Defendant noticed its motion for summary judgment (Docket # 22) for hearing on

December 5, 2007. The Court received a letter from Plaintiff on November 1, 2007,

informing the Court that Defendants had filed a Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts

without meeting and conferring with Plaintiff to attempt to arrive at a Joint Statement of

Undisputed Facts, as required by the Court’s Standing Order at Part 9:

“Motions for summary judgment in cases assigned to Magistrate Judge

Larson for trial shall be accompanied by a statement of the material facts not

in dispute supported by citations to admissible evidence. The parties shall file

a joint statement of undisputed facts wherever possible. If the parties are

unable to reach complete agreement after meeting and conferring, they shall

file a joint statement of the undisputed facts about which they do agree. Any

party may then file a separate statement of the additional facts which the

party contends are undisputed.” (emphasis added). 

Case 3:06-cv-07073-JL Document 28 Filed 11/16/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\JLALL\CHAMBERS\CASES\CIVIL\06-7073\Order meet and confer.wpd 2

Plaintiff did not provide a copy to Defendant and Defendant did not respond to this

letter. However, this is an e-filing case and presumably Defendant had access to the letter. 

Plaintiff asks the Court to either deny Defendant’s motion outright, or, in the

alternative, to continue the hearing on the motion to the end of January, 2008, to give the

parties time to meet and confer and prepare a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts. 

The Court hereby continues the hearing on Defendant’s motion to January 30, 2008

at 9:30 a.m. and orders the parties to meet and confer and prepare a statement in

compliance with the Court’s Standing Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 16, 2007 

__________________________________

 James Larson

 Chief Magistrate Judge

G:\JLALL\CHAMBERS\CASES\CIVIL\06-7073\Order meet and confer.wpd

Case 3:06-cv-07073-JL Document 28 Filed 11/16/07 Page 2 of 2