Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01772/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01772-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TONY BLACKMAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

K. LAVALLEUR, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-1772 GEB AC P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed September 23, 2015, this court directed plaintiff, a designated 

“three-strikes litigant” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), to pay the full filing fee in this action within 

thirty days in order to proceed. See ECF No. 6. The court informed plaintiff that failure to timely 

pay the filing fee would result in a recommendation that his action be dismissed without 

prejudice. Id. at 3. The time for submitting the filing fee has expired. Plaintiff has not submitted 

the fee or otherwise communicated with the court. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

Case 2:15-cv-01772-GEB-AC Document 7 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: November 9, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-01772-GEB-AC Document 7 Filed 11/09/15 Page 2 of 2