Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01024/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01024-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Thomas A. Callan, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Commissioner of the Internal Revenue

Service, the Department of Treasury, The

Disclosure Office U. S. Tax Court

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-1024-PHX-LOA

ORDER

This Court has received and considered Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma

Pauperis and Supporting Information (Dkt. #3).

Plaintiff has failed to fully answer question numbers 1(a) and (b) wherein it states:

"1. 'Are you presently employed?' to which the Plaintiff has answered 'No'.

a. If the answer is 'yes', state the amount of your salary or wages per month

and give the name and address of your employer." The Plaintiff has not given

any response to 1(a) in light if his response to number 1.

"b. If the answer is 'no', state the date of the last employment and the amount

of the salary and wages per month which you received." The Plaintiff has

answered "self-employed".

The undersigned considers "self-employment" as a form of employment to which the

Plaintiff should have answered "Yes" to question number 1 and set forth the information

required in number 1(a). 

Case 2:06-cv-01024-DGC Document 5 Filed 04/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Plaintiff has not fully answered question number 3 to which Plaintiff has circled "Yes"

to 3(a). Plaintiff has not set forth the amount of money he has received as a result of his

answer to 3(a) during the past twelve months. 

Plaintiff has failed to answer question number 6 at all.

Further, Plaintiff has crossed out a portion of the declaration statement as follows:

"I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct." 

Pursuant to Local Rule 3.3, LRCiv, Rules of Practice, effective December 1, 2005 the Court

will not accept the omission by the Plaintiff that he will not declare "under penalty of

perjury" that the supporting information is true and correct.

Further, the undersigned cannot read what Plaintiff has printed on the line underneath

the signature of Plaintiff.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have ten days from the entry of this Order to file

an Amended Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Supporting Information which

legible, has been completed in full and under declaration of penalty for its truth and

correctness or pay the filing fee of $350.00. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to timely file an Amended Motion

to Proceed In Forma Pauperis as ordered herein, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing by

April 28, 2006 why this matter should not be dismissed without prejudice.

The Clerk shall forthwith notify the Plaintiff of the entry of this Order.

DATED this 14th day of April, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-01024-DGC Document 5 Filed 04/17/06 Page 2 of 2