Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00061/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00061-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Larry Caldwell, SBN 88867

1380 Lead Hill Boulevard Suite 106

Roseville, CA 95661

(916)774-4667

(916)797-4954

Plaintiff, In Pro Per

Kevin T. Snider, SBN 170988

Mathew McReynolds, SBN 234797

PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE

9851 Horn Road, Suite 115

PO Box 276600

Sacramento, CA 95827

Tel. (916) 857-6900 

Fax (916) 857-6902

Attorneys for Plaintiff Larry Caldwell. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY CALDWELL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ROSEVILLE JOINT UNION HIGH

SCHOOL DISTRICT; JAMES JOINER;

R. JAN PINNEY; TONY MONETTI;

STEVEN LAWRENCE; DONALD

GENASCI; RONALD SEVERSON,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:05-CV-00061-FCD-JFM

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PAGE

EXTENSION AND CONTINUATION OF

HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF’S AND

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGEMENT

DATE: October 13, 2006

TIME: 10:00 a.m.

CTRM: 2 

JUDGE: Hon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr.

TRIAL DATE: None set

///

///

Case 2:05-cv-00061-FCD-JFM Document 81 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

STIPULATION

In an order dated July 26, 2006, the Court has ordered defendants to re-file their Motion

for Summary Judgment by August 9, 2006, and for hearing on September 15, 2006.

In said order, the Court has granted defendants a ten page extension from its standard

twenty page limit for a memorandum of points and authorities. 

Pursuant to the Court's Order dated July 18, 2006, Plaintiff’s motion for summary

judgment is currently scheduled for filing and service on August 4, 2006, and for hearing on

September 15, 2006. 

Plaintiff is also in need of a page extension as well as a time extension in order to combine

his planned three motions for partial summary judgment into a single motion for summary

judgment, so that Plaintiff's summary judgment motion will be in compliance with the Court's

direction to Defendants in the July 26, 2006 Order that Defendants are to file a single summary

judgment motion, rather than multiple summary judgment motions.

Attorney James B. Carr has recently left the employ of Evans, Wieckowski & Ward.

James K. Ward will be taking over the handling of this file on behalf of Defendants and will need

additional time to become familiar with the file and prepare and file the Defendants’ motion. 

Therefore, Plaintiff and his co-counsel, and Defendants, through their attorneys of record,

do hereby stipulate to a ten (10) page extension to Plaintiff’s memorandum of points and

authorities in support of summary judgment, and Plaintiff and his co-counsel, and Defendants,

through their attorneys of record, also stipulate to continue the proposed hearing date on the

parties’ respective motions for summary judgment to October 13, 2006 or to a subsequent date

Case 2:05-cv-00061-FCD-JFM Document 81 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

that is convenient to the court’s calendar. 

Further, the parties do hereby stipulate to the continuance of hearing on

Defendants’ Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions, to the same date and time as hearing on motions for

summary judgment. 

The parties further stipulate to the filing and service of moving, opposition and

reply papers based upon the hearing date and the court’s local rules (78-230).

 SO STIPULATED.

 August 1, 2006 ______/s/Larry Caldwell________

 Larry Caldwell, Plaintiff in Pro Per

DATED: August 1, 2006

PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE

By: ___/s/ Kevin T. Snider_______

Kevin T. Snider, Esq.,

Attorney for Plaintiff

 

DATED: August 1, 2006 EVANS, WEICKOWSKI & WARD, LLP

By: /s/ James K. Ward .

 James K. Ward

 Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing stipulation by the parties, and good cause appearing for the

relief sought in the Stipulation, the Court orders as follows:

Hearing on the parties’ motion for summary judgment is continued from 

September 15, 2006 to October 13, 2006 at 10:00 a.m.

Plaintiff and Defendants are granted a ten-page extension to the standard twenty pages for

a memorandum of points and authorities.

Case 2:05-cv-00061-FCD-JFM Document 81 Filed 08/04/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Hearing on Defendants’ Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions is continued to October 13, 2006 at

10:00 a.m. Filing and service of moving, opposition and reply papers governed by Local Rule

(78-230).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: August 4, 2006 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr.

FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cv-00061-FCD-JFM Document 81 Filed 08/04/06 Page 4 of 4