Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00784/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00784-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID WHITE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

TOM HANSEN, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 05-784 SBA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

DISMISSAL

Plaintiff has named as defendants in this action Apogent Technologies Inc. and Fisher Scientific

International Inc. However, although Plaintiff initially filed his complaint on January 21, 2005, Plaintiff has

failed to provide evidence that either of these Defendants have been properly served. 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) Plaintiff shall appear in Courtroom 3 of the United States Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street,

Oakland, California, on September 21, 2005 at 4:00 p.m. to show cause why these Defendants should

not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

(2) At least ten (10) days prior to the date specified for the court appearance, plaintiff or

plaintiff’s counsel of record must file a Certificate of Counsel with the Clerk of the Court to explain why the

case should or should not be dismissed and why sanctions should or should not be imposed for lack of

prosecution. The Certificate shall set forth why these Defendants have or have not been properly served,

any basis for opposition to dismissal of these Defendants by any party, and the action’s expected course if

Case 4:05-cv-00784-SBA Document 40 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

these Defendants are not dismissed.

(3) Please take notice that this Order requires both the specified court appearance and the

filing of the Certificate of Counsel. FAILURE TO FULLY COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL BE

DEEMED SUFFICIENT GROUNDS TO DISMISS APOGENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND

FISHER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL INC. FROM THIS ACTION.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

Dated: 7/27/05 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-00784-SBA Document 40 Filed 07/27/05 Page 2 of 2