Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02230/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02230-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAZMA DIWALI ANAYA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-02230-SI 

DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 21

Pro se plaintiff Tazma Diwali Anaya’s time to serve defendants with service of process 

expired, after extension, on November 16, 2015. Since the Court granted plaintiff a 60-day 

extension for service, plaintiff has filed two motions for an extension of time to amend her 

complaint but has not served defendants. See Dkt. Nos. 18, 20, 21. 

This Court has issued three orders reminding plaintiff of her obligation to serve defendants 

with process, stating the deadline by which to do so, and notifying her that failure to serve 

defendants could result in dismissal of the case without prejudice. See Dkt. Nos. 12, 15, 18. Two 

of these orders have informed plaintiff of the availability of the Legal Help Desk, which could 

advise plaintiff concerning how to accomplish service of process. See Dkt. Nos. 12, 18. 

The Court declines to issue further extensions at this time. This action is DISMISSED 

without prejudice for failure to effect service of process as ordered by the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 19, 2015

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-02230-SI Document 22 Filed 11/19/15 Page 1 of 1