Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05093/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05093-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN BOLITHO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

VALLEY RADIOLOGY MEDICAL

ASSOCIATES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-04-5093 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DE FEO

DEFENDANTS TO LODGE CHAMBERS

COPIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On July 22, 2005, defendants Pio de Feo and Maria de Feo (“de Feo defendants”)

electronically filed an answer to the above-titled complaint. On July 25, 2005, the de Feo

defendants filed addenda to their previously-filed answer. The de Feo defendants have

violated General Order 45 and the Court’s standing orders, however, by failing to deliver to

the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers

are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . .

marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and

‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also Standing Orders

For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

The de Feo defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and

the Court’s standing orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of the abovereferenced documents. The parties are hereby advised that if either party fails in the future

Case 3:04-cv-05093-MMC Document 28 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

to comply with the Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed

documents, the Court may impose sanctions on the noncomplying party, including, but not

limited to, striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers

copy has not been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 29, 2005 

/s/ Maxine M. Chesney 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-05093-MMC Document 28 Filed 07/29/05 Page 2 of 2