Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05094/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05094-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REMBRANDT PATENT INNOVATIONS

LLC, and REMBRANDT SECURE

COMPUTING, LP,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 14-05094 WHA (lead)

No. C 14-05093 WHA (consolidated)

ORDER DENYING

REMBRANDT’S MOTION AS

MOOT AND VACATING

HEARING

Apple filed a statement of non-opposition indicating that it does not oppose

Rembrandt’s letter brief seeking a protective order regarding the details of the fee arrangement

between Rembrandt and its counsel (Dkt. No. 160). Rembrandt confirmed that Apple’s

statement moots its motion (Dkt. No. 162). Accordingly, Rembrandt’s motion is DENIED AS

MOOT. The hearing scheduled for MARCH 1 AT 10:30 A.M. is hereby VACATED.

Dated: February 29, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-05094-WHA Document 164 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 1