Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00890/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00890-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

AND DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT / CASE NO. 15-CV-00890 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ROSE FEAVER, an individual, ARTIN ADAMIAN, 

an individual, and MYUNGSHUN SHIM, an 

individual, and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., 

KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, and DOES 1-

50, Inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 15-cv-00890-EMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

STIPULATION REGARDING 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND 

DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

AS AMENDED

Case 3:15-cv-00890-EMC Document 66 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 4
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

AND DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT / CASE NO. 15-CV-00890 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION REGARDING NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

AND DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT, having reviewed the pleadings and papers on file in this action, and 

having considered the Parties’ arguments, the Court makes the following findings, and good cause 

appearing, makes the following order: 

1. The Parties’ Stipulation Regarding Notice of Settlement and Dismissal of Lawsuit is 

GRANTED; 

2. The settlements reached by the Parties represent fair and equitable resolutions of this 

action, reasonably resolve bona fide disagreements between the Parties regarding the merits of the 

claims asserted by Plaintiffs, and demonstrate a good-faith intention by the Parties that the claims of 

Plaintiffs be fully and finally resolved, and not re-litigated in whole or in part at any point in the future; 

3. The settlements reached by the Parties are approved by this Court; 

4. Pursuant to the terms of the Parties’ confidential Settlement Agreements, the abovecaption action, including Plaintiffs’ Fair Labor Standards Act claims, and all claims for relief set forth 

therein, shall be dismissed with prejudice; 

5. Each side shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs, except as may otherwise be

provided in the confidential settlement agreements. 

6. The Notice of Settlement, attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is to be mailed to the other OPMs 

within 14 business days of the entry of this Order, with a website to be established by the Administrator 

and which shall have copies of the complaint, the Court’s ruling on the motion for conditional 

certification, and the Parties’ joint motion for approval of the settlement, which is to remain available for 

at least 120 days after it is created. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE: _____________________ _________________________________ 

 The Hon. Edward M. Chen 

 United States District Court Judge 

This order disposes of Docket Nos. 57 and 65. as amended by the Court July 22, 2016

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00890-EMC Document 66 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 4
EXHIBIT " 1 " 

Case 3:15-cv-00890-EMC Document 66 Filed 07/28/16 Page 3 of 4
NOTICE OF TERMINATION 

FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT LAWSUIT 

From: Claims Administrator, Feaver, et al. v. Kaiser Foundation Health Planet al. 

To: All Outpatient Pharmacy Managers ("OPMs") who have worked for Kaiser at anytime from 

October 4, 2013 through the present. 

Date: [Date of mailing] 

Re: Termination of a purported collective action lawsuit against Kaiser Foundation Health Plan and 

Kaiser Foundation Hospitals ("Kaiser") under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. 

The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the dismissal of a collective action lawsuit. Three 

present or former OPMs at Kaiser, Plaintiffs, Artin Adamian, Myungsun Shim, and Rose Feaver 

(collectively "Plaintiffs"), sued Kaiser in the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California in the lawsuit Feaver et al. v. Kaiser Health Plan et al, Docket No. 3:15-CV-00890 

("Lawsuit"). Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against Kaiser on February 26, 2015. Plaintiffs are current and 

former OPMs employed by Kaiser who claim they were not paid overtime wages for all hours they 

worked. They assert their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and California law. 

Plaintiffs filed the lawsuit individually and on behalf of all other allegedly similarly situated persons. The 

alleged class period runs from October 4, 2013 to the present. The lawsuit seeks alleged back overtime 

pay, other penalties, interest and attorneys' fees. Kaiser very strenuously disputes the claims being made. 

The Court has made no ruling on the substantive merits of the case at any point prior to 

dismissal. At the parties' joint request the Court has agreed to dismiss the Lawsuit. The Court has 

ordered notice to OPMs who worked during the above period of the dismissal of the Lawsuit. Documents 

related to the case are on a website at _______ per the Court order. This dismissal means that 

the Court will not consider whether the claims being made should be certified or not, and no further 

OPMs can join as party plaintiffs. If you have questions regarding the effect of the dismissal on your 

rights, if any, and what your legal rights may or may not be you should promptly consult with an attorney 

of your choosing as there are certain time limits that apply to your ability to bring claims. 

THIS NOTICE AND ITS CONTENTS HAVE BEEN ORDERED BY THE FEDERAL DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICJ' OF CALIFORNIA, HONORABLE EDWARD M. 

CHEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. THE COURT HAS TAKEN NO POSITION IN 

THIS CASE REGARDING THE MERITS OF PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS OR OF KAISER'S 

DEFENSES. PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT, THE COURT'S CLERK, OR THE 

JUDGE. THEY ARE NOT PERMITTED TO ADDRESS YOUR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS. 

The highlighted sentence should be the first sentence in this 

paragraph (i.e., swap the first and second sentence of this 

paragraph.)

Case 3:15-cv-00890-EMC Document 66 Filed 07/28/16 Page 4 of 4