Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00115/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00115-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK WAYNE SOLOMON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE; CITY

OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE POLICE

DEPARTMENT; OFFICER J.

ERMINGHAUS, individually and in

his official capacity; COUNTY OF

EL DORADO; OFFICER BRANDON PENA

individually and in his official

capacity; 

 Defendants.*

________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2:13-cv-00115-GEB-CKD

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

The Joint Status Report filed March 11, 2013 (“JSR”) reveals

this case is not ready to be scheduled. 

Plaintiff states in the JSR that he “will be filing an

amendment to the Complaint after agreement by all Defendants.” (JSR

3:13-14.) However, Plaintiff neither provides any information concerning

when the referenced amendment will be filed, nor addresses how the

amendment will affect the pending dismissal motion (ECF No. 11). Such

information is necessary in determining how to schedule this action.

Further, Local Rule 160(a) requires the parties to notify the Court

immediately “when any motion . . . has been resolved . . . .” 

The caption has been amended according to the Dismissal of Doe *

Defendants portion of this Order and the dismissal of Defendant El

Dorado County Sheriff’s Department. (See ECF No. 27.) 

1

Case 2:13-cv-00115-GEB-CKD Document 28 Filed 03/28/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

For the stated reasons, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling)

Conference scheduled for hearing on April 1, 2013, is continued to April

15, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report shall be filed no

later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference.

Further, Does 1 through 10 are dismissed since Plaintiff has

not justified Does remaining in this action. See Order Setting Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference filed January 22, 2013, at 2 n.2

(indicating that if justification for “Doe” defendant allegations not

provided Doe defendants would be dismissed).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2013

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge

2

Case 2:13-cv-00115-GEB-CKD Document 28 Filed 03/28/13 Page 2 of 2