Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02559/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02559-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REGINA FRAIZER,

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-02559-JD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On May 7, 2015, pro se plaintiff Regina Fraizer filed a complaint against defendants Wells 

Fargo Bank, N.A., and Martha G. Bronitsky. Notice of Removal, Dkt. No. 1. The case was 

removed to this Court on June 9, 2015. See id. On June 15, 2015, Wells Fargo filed a motion to 

dismiss the complaint. See Mot. to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 10. Ms. Fraizer did not file a response to 

Wells Fargo’s motion within the time period required by Civil Local Rule 7-3.

Ms. Fraizer is ordered to show cause why Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss should not be 

granted. Ms. Fraizer’s response is due by August 24, 2015. If Ms. Fraizer no longer intends to 

prosecute this case, she should file a notice of voluntary dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). 

Failure to respond to Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss may result in the motion being granted, and 

the action being dismissed for failure to prosecute.

The hearing on the motion to dismiss, which was set for August 19, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., is 

vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 14, 2015

________________________

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-02559-JD Document 12 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 1