Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01297/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01297-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stip. to Extend Time to Confer Under FRCP 26(F), to Object to Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order, and to Take Motion 

Hearing Off Calendar; Order Thereon(2:16-cv-01297-MCE-GGH)

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672

Attorney General of California

JON S. ALLIN, State Bar No. 155069

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

MAUREEN C. ONYEAGBAKO, State Bar No. 238419

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 322-7119

Fax: (916) 324-5205

E-mail: Maureen.Onyeagbako@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendants Maydole, State 

of California, California Department of 

Corrections and Rehabilitation, and 

California Correctional Center

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MARIA AGUIRRE, as personal 

representative of the Estate of JONATHAN 

VELARDE,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND 

REHABILITATION; CALIFORNIA 

CORRECTIONAL CENTER; DONALD 

MAYDOLE; and DOES 1 through 100, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

2:16-cv-01297-MCE-GGH

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

CONFER UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF 

CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(F), TO OBJECT 

TO INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING 

ORDER, AND TO TAKE HEARING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS OFF 

CALENDAR; ORDER THEREON

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

Action Filed: June 9, 2016

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:16-cv-01297-MCE-GGH Document 14 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stip. to Extend Time to Confer Under FRCP 26(F), to Object to Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order, and to Take Motion 

Hearing Off Calendar; Order Thereon(2:16-cv-01297-MCE-GGH)

Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate to continue the 

previously agreed upon time for a conference under Federal Rule of Civil Procedures 26(f), from 

September 9, 2016 to October 31, 2016. The parties also stipulate to extend the deadline for 

filing objections to the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order to fourteen days after the Rule 26(f) 

conference.

Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) 

in response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. Plaintiffs will file and serve a First Amended Complaint by 

September 26, 2016. Defendants’ responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint 

will be filed and served by October 13, 2016. 

If Plaintiffs file and serve an amended complaint by September 26, 2016, the parties 

stipulate to take the November 17, 2016 hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss off calendar.

Given the anticipated amendment, the parties, claims, and defenses are uncertain at this 

time. This uncertainty precludes the parties from effectively preparing disclosures and discussing 

the discovery issues outlined in Rule 26.

The current uncertainty also prevents the parties from determining whether any variance 

in the deadlines outlined by the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order (Order, June 13, 2016, ECF 

No. 3) are warranted. All Defendants had been served by July 18, 2016, making objections to the 

Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order due on September 19, 2016. The parties expect to have more 

clarity on potential objections after the First Amended Complaint and responsive pleading have 

been filed. 

Additionally, Deputy Attorney General Maureen Onyeagbako will not be able to engage 

in a Rule 26(f) conference during the week of October 10 because she will be out of the office to 

prepare for trial in Bryant v. Gallagher, et al., No. 1:11-cv-00446-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal.). The 

trial will begin on October 17, 2016, and is expected to last three to four days.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:16-cv-01297-MCE-GGH Document 14 Filed 09/22/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Stip. to Extend Time to Confer Under FRCP 26(F), to Object to Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order, and to Take Motion 

Hearing Off Calendar; Order Thereon(2:16-cv-01297-MCE-GGH)

Based on the foregoing, the parties stipulate to a new Rule 26(f) conference date of 

October 31, 2016 and will file the Rule 26(f)(3) discovery plan and objections to the Initial 

Pretrial Scheduling Order within fourteen days of the parties’ conference. 

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: September 15, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

JON S. ALLIN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

/s/ Maureen C. Onyeagbako

___________________________________

MAUREEN C. ONYEAGBAKO

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants Maydole, State 

of California, California Department of 

Corrections and Rehabilitation, and 

California Correctional Center

Dated: September 15, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

LARRY RABINEAU

VIRGINIA NARIAN

Law Offices of Larry Rabineau

/s/ Virginia Narian

(as authorized on September 15, 2016) ___________________________________

VIRGINIA NARIAN

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

/ / / 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:16-cv-01297-MCE-GGH Document 14 Filed 09/22/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

Stip. to Extend Time to Confer Under FRCP 26(F), to Object to Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order, and to Take Motion 

Hearing Off Calendar; Order Thereon(2:16-cv-01297-MCE-GGH)

ORDER

In accordance with the parties’ foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing, the time 

for the parties to confer under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) is extended to October 31, 

2016. The parties shall file the Rule 26(f)(3) discovery plan and objections to the Initial Pretrial 

Scheduling Order within fourteen days of the Rule 26(f) conference.

If Plaintiffs file an amended complaint by September 26, 2016, the November 17, 2016 

hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be taken off calendar.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 21, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-01297-MCE-GGH Document 14 Filed 09/22/16 Page 4 of 4