Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00595/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00595-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Marvin A. Saunders, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the 

Social Security Administration, 

Defendant. 

No. CV08-0595-PHX-DGC

AMENDED ORDER 

 Plaintiff’s attorney has filed a motion to modify court order dated May 1, 2012 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 60(b). Doc. 53. The Court will grant the motion. 

I. Background. 

On March 27, 2008, Plaintiff filed a request for judicial review of Defendant’s 

finding that Plaintiff was not disabled under the Social Security Act and was not entitled 

to Disability Insurance Benefits. Doc. 1. On September 16, 2009, the Court affirmed 

Defendant’s decision. Doc. 20. Plaintiff appealed to the Ninth Circuit, and on May 12, 

2011, the Ninth Circuit remanded the matter to this Court for further proceedings. 

Doc. 31-1. On August 25, 2011, the Court remanded the matter to Defendant for an 

award of benefits. Doc. 38. Plaintiff’s attorney filed a motion for an award of attorneys’ 

fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Doc. 49. The Court entered an order (Doc. 52) 

granting the attorneys’ fees. Plaintiff’s attorney then filed a motion to modify court order 

dated May 1, 2012 pursuant to Fed. R. .Civ. P. 60(b). Doc. 53. Counsel for Defendant 

Case 2:08-cv-00595-DGC Document 54 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

have indicated to the Court that they do not oppose the motion. 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to modify Court order 

(Doc. 53) is granted. The Court’s order (Doc. 52) is modified to reflect attorneys’ fees 

in the amount of $26,908.00. 

 Dated this 24th day of May, 2012. 

Case 2:08-cv-00595-DGC Document 54 Filed 05/24/12 Page 2 of 2