Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00989/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00989-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASKIA ASHANTI, aka,

LORENZO CUNNINGHAM,

Plaintiff, 2:06-cv-0989-GEB-GGH-P

vs.

CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On July 7, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s order filed

June 26, 2006, denying plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. The court construes

plaintiff’s objections as a request for reconsideration of the June 26, 2006, order.

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that 

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00989-GEB-GGH Document 8 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed June 26, 2006, is

affirmed;

2. Plaintiff’s is granted thirty days from the date of this order to pay the filing fee. 

Dated: July 14, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00989-GEB-GGH Document 8 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2