Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-00222/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-00222-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

No. C-09-0222-CW 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUATION OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP 

LIONEL Z. GLANCY (S.B.#134180) 

MICHAEL GOLDBERG (S.B.#196382) 

1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Telephone: (310) 201-9150 

Facsimile: (310) 201-9160 

E-mail: info@glancylaw.com

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT CALIFORNIA 

______________________________ 

 ) 

IN RE RACKABLE SYSTEMS, INC.) Case No. C-09-0222-CW 

SECURITIES LITIGATION ) 

______________________________ ) CLASS ACTION 

 ) 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) 

ALL ACTIONS ) 

______________________________ ) 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND 

CONTINUATION OF THE MAY 11, 2010, CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Case 4:09-cv-00222-CW Document 64 Filed 05/12/10 Page 1 of 4
No. C-09-0222-CW 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUATION OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WHEREAS, pursuant to a previous stipulation of Lead Plaintiffs Gerald Dull and 

Vincent Fusco (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Rackable Systems, Inc., Thomas K. Barton and 

Madhu Ranganathan (“Defendants”) and this Court’s Order dated April 5, 2010, Defendants 

filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities 

Laws (“Second Amended Complaint”) on April 9, 2010; 

 WHEREAS, Defendants scheduled the hearing for their motion to dismiss to be held 

June 3, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2; 

WHEREAS, under the parties’ previously stipulated briefing schedule, the Court may 

have only eight days between the filing of Plaintiffs’ reply to Defendants’ motion to dismiss and 

the June 3, 2010, hearing date for the motion to dismiss; 

 WHEREAS, by Order dated May 6, 2010, the Court vacated the Case Management 

Conference scheduled for May 11, 2010, and ordered the parties to meet and confer and 

stipulate to a new briefing schedule which will comply with Local Rule 7-3(c); 

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agree that: (i) Plaintiffs’ shall file their 

opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss no later than May 26, 2010; (ii) Defendants shall 

file their reply to Plaintiffs’ opposition no later than June 17, 2010; and (iii) the hearing date for 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss will be continued to July 1, 2010; 

 NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate and agree, and 

respectfully request that the Court enter an order, as follows: 

1. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss no 

later than May 26, 2010. 

2. Defendants shall file their reply to Lead Plaintiffs’ opposition no later 

than June 17, 2010. 

3. The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss, which was previously 

scheduled for June 3, 2010, shall be continued to July 1, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2. 

4. The Case Management Conference previously scheduled for May 11, 

Case 4:09-cv-00222-CW Document 64 Filed 05/12/10 Page 2 of 4
No. C-09-0222-CW 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUATION OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2010, shall be continued and will be held on the same date -- July 1, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. in 

Courtroom 2 -- as the hearing on the motion to dismiss. 

 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: May 10, 2010 GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP 

 By: /s/ Michael Goldberg 

 Michael Goldberg (SB#188669) 

 1801 Ave. of the Stars, Suite 311 

 Los Angeles, CA, 90067 

 Tel: (310) 201-9150 

 Fax: (310) 201-9160 

 E-mail: info@glancylaw.com

 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Class 

 

Dated: May 10, 2010 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Pete Snow 

Pete Snow 

Meredith N. Landy 

Attorneys for Defendants Rackable Systems, 

Inc., Thomas K. Barton and Madhu 

Ranganathan 

I, Michael Goldberg, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file 

this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding the Filing and Briefing of Plaintiffs’ 

Supplemental Second Amended Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that Meredith N. Landy has concurred in this filing. 

By: /s/ Michael Goldberg_____

 Michael Goldberg 

Case 4:09-cv-00222-CW Document 64 Filed 05/12/10 Page 3 of 4
No. C-09-0222-CW 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUATION OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

O R D E R

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: __________, 2010 

 The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Judge 

May 12

Case 4:09-cv-00222-CW Document 64 Filed 05/12/10 Page 4 of 4