Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00823/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00823-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

TINA MILINOVICH, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-15-823 MMC

ORDER VACATING IN PART ORDER

FILED DECEMBER 10, 2015;

APPROVING PARTIES’ STIPULATION IN

ITS ENTIRETY; DIRECTIONS TO

PARTIES; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

By order filed December 10, 2015, the Court approved in part and denied in part the

parties’ “Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Distribution of Proceeds and Dismissal of

Action,” filed November 13, 2015, construed by the Court as a petition for approval of a

minor’s compromise. In particular, the Court approved as fair and reasonable the amount

of the settlement funds allocated to the minor, but did not approve the manner in which

those funds were to be held for the benefit of the minor. On today’s date, the Court

conducted a status conference with respect to the latter. G. Scott Emblidge of Moscone

Emblidge & Otis LLP appeared on behalf of Paula Haskell Miraglia. Ciarán O’Sullivan of

the Law Office of Ciarán O’Sullivan appeared on behalf of Michael Low, the guardian ad

litem appointed by the Court for the minor, I.G.M.

Case 3:15-cv-00823-MMC Document 52 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Having considered the parties’ Joint Case Management Statement, filed January 14,

2016, the additional information provided to the Court by counsel at the Status Conference,

and counsel’s joint recommendation that the settlement be approved as entered, the Court

has reconsidered its Order of December 10, 2015, VACATES said order to the extent it

denies in part the Stipulation, and hereby APPROVES the Stipulation in its entirety.

In light of the above, it is hereby further ordered that the parties comply with the

above stipulation, that the Clerk release the funds as stipulated, that the parties promptly

file receipts showing the ordered distributions, that appropriate dismissals be filed, and that

the guardian ad litem is discharged upon dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 15, 2016 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00823-MMC Document 52 Filed 01/15/16 Page 2 of 2