Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80102/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-mc-80102-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY BAUMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

V THEATER GROUP, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-mc-80102-JSC 

ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY 

LETTER BRIEF

Re: Dkt. No. 10

This matter first came before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Application for an Order to Show 

Cause Why Twilio, Inc., Should Not Be Held in Contempt following third-party Twilio’s alleged 

non-compliance with a subpoena issued in this District which related to proceedings in the United 

States District Court for the District of Nevada. See Bauman c. V. Theater Group, LLC, at al., No. 

14-1125 RBF-PAL (D. Nev.); Razilou v. V. Theater Group, LLC, et al., No. 14-1160 RBF-PAL 

(D. Nev.). Plaintiffs and third-party Twilio appeared for a hearing on an Order to Show Cause on 

April 16, 2015 and the parties were ordered to meet and confer regarding the subpoena. If the 

parties were unable to resolve the matter through a good faith meet and confer, they were to file a 

joint letter brief by April 29, 2015. (Dkt. No. 9.) The parties did not do so.

However, on May 6, 2015, the parties filed the now pending Joint Discovery Letter Brief 

(Dkt. No. 10). According to the letter brief, the parties agreed through the meet and confer that 

Twilio would produce four categories of documents. Twilio has done so and Plaintiffs dispute the 

adequacy of the production with respect to two of the categories; namely, (1) all transmittal 

records from Defendants’ accounts, and (2) copies of Defendants’ customer profiles.

The parties are ordered to appear for a hearing on this matter on May 14, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. 

in Courtroom F, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California. Plaintiffs shall be prepared to 

Case 3:15-mc-80102-JSC Document 13 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

discuss, among other issues, the relevance of the information sought with respect to Plaintiffs’ 

claims against the Defendants in underlying actions, and why the information sought is not 

otherwise available from the Defendants in these actions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 8, 2015

________________________

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-mc-80102-JSC Document 13 Filed 05/08/15 Page 2 of 2