Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00643/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00643-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE NETFLIX

ANTITRUST LITIGATION.

 /

This Document Relates to: 

All Actions. /

No. C 07-00643 WHA

Related to:

No. C 07-01266 WHA 

No. C 07-01978 WHA

ORDER RE STAY OF

DISCOVERY

A few hours after our case management conference, the parties in the patentinfringement action filed a stipulation dismissing the antitrust counterclaim. This circumstance

would have been relevant to the discussion held at the CMC concerning whether discovery

should proceed in the instant action and whether counsel were depending on the antitrust action

to establish elements of the claim. Since this new circumstance was not known to plaintiffs’

counsel or to the Court, this order invites memoranda (up to five pages) as to whether a

discovery stay is warranted. Please file by FRIDAY, MAY 4, 2007, AT NOON. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2007. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-00643-WHA Document 22 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 1