Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01410/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01410-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GERROD L. HERNDON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA STATE PAROLE OFFICE, 

et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-1410 CKD P

ORDER and FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on June 22, 2016,

along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) As the application 

was incomplete, on June 30, 2016, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file a completed 

affidavit in support of his request and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement. (ECF 

No. 4.) Plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with this order would result in the dismissal 

of this action without prejudice. (Id.) The thirty-day period has passed, and plaintiff has not 

responded to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a 

district judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

////

Case 2:16-cv-01410-CKD Document 5 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: August 12, 2016

2 / hern1410.fifp

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-01410-CKD Document 5 Filed 08/12/16 Page 2 of 2