Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-01745/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-01745-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOBIAPPS, INC., a Texas corporation, CV NO. 06-CV-1745 LAB (JMA)

Plaintiff,

JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

AND ORDER THEREON

v.

QUAKE GLOBAL, INC., a California

corporation,

Defendant.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

AND CROSS-CLAIMS.

Pursuant to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California,

Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policy and Procedures Manual, Section 2.f. all parties

jointly move the Court for the entry of a protective order in this case.

This joint motion is filed to expedite the flow of discovery materials, to facilitate the

prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect

information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that only materials the parties

are entitled to keep confidential are subject to such treatment, and to ensure that the parties are

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 1 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

permitted reasonably necessary uses of such materials in preparation for and in the conduct of

trial, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). Accordingly, the parties to this action hereby stipulate

and agree to, and request that the Court enter the following protective order:

1. Scope Of Protection.

1.1 This Protective Order shall govern any information, document or thing

designated pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Protective Order, produced in this action, including all

designated deposition testimony, all designated testimony taken at a hearing or other proceeding,

all designated interrogatory answers, documents and other discovery materials and things,

whether produced informally or in response to interrogatories, requests for admissions, requests

for production of documents or other formal method of discovery.

1.2 This Protective Order shall also govern any designated information,

document or thing produced in this action pursuant to required disclosures under any federal

procedural rule, Southern District of California local rule, and any supplementary disclosures

thereto.

1.3 This Protective Order shall apply to the parties and any nonparty from

whom discovery is sought and who desires the protection of this Protective Order. 

2. Designation.

2.1 Each party shall have the right to designate as "Confidential" and subject

to this Protective Order any information, document or thing produced by it in this action which

contains, reflects, or otherwise discloses confidential technical, business or financial information. 

This designation shall be made by stamping or otherwise labeling each page or thing containing

Confidential information with the legend CONFIDENTIAL (or like designation) prior to its

production or, if inadvertently produced without such legend, pursuant to the procedure set forth

in paragraph 15.

2.2 Each party shall have the right to designate as "Attorneys' Eyes Only," any

information, document or thing produced in this action which contains, reflects or otherwise

discloses trade secrets, current research and development or competitively sensitive information. 

Such "Attorneys' Eyes Only" information, documents and things may include, without limitation,

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 2 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

currently competitive trade secrets, confidential technical information, technical practices,

methods, or other know-how, minutes of Board meetings, pricing data, financial data, sales

information, customer-confidential information, agreements or relationships with non-parties,

market projections or forecasts, strategic business plans, selling or marketing strategies or new

product development, testing, manufacturing costs or information about employees. This

designation shall be made by stamping or otherwise labeling each page or thing containing

Attorneys' Eyes Only information with the legend ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY (or like

designation) prior to its production or, if inadvertently produced without such legend, pursuant to

the procedure set forth in paragraph 15.

2.3 The parties will use reasonable care to avoid designating any information,

documents or things Confidential that are generally available to the public. The parties will also

use reasonable care to avoid designating any information, documents or things "Confidential" or

"Attorneys' Eyes Only" for which the designating party does not have a good faith belief that the

information, documents or things satisfy the criteria set forth in this paragraph. To the extent that

material is marked Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only (collectively "Designated Information"),

such material shall be revealed to or used only by qualified persons as provided for in paragraph 4

and shall not be communicated in any manner, either directly or indirectly, to any person or entity

not permitted disclosure pursuant to this Protective Order. Any copies of such material, abstracts,

summaries or information derived therefrom, and any notes or other records regarding the

contents thereof shall also be deemed Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only and the same terms

regarding confidentiality of these materials shall apply as apply to the originals. 

2.4 With respect to all materials provided for inspection by a party's counsel,

designation by stamping or labeling need not be made until copies of the materials are requested

after inspection and selection by counsel. Making documents and things available for inspection

shall not constitute a waiver of any claim of confidentiality, and all materials provided for

inspection by a party's counsel shall be treated as though designated Attorneys' Eyes Only from

the time of the inspection until otherwise designated pursuant to this Protective Order or produced

without a designation.

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 3 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

3. Limit On Use And Disclosure Of Designated Information.

3.1 All recipients of Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only information

pursuant to this Protective Order shall use any Designated Information governed by this

Protective Order only in connection with the prosecution or defense of this action, except by

consent of the parties or order of the Court. The prosecution and defense of this action does not

include prosecution of patent applications, reissue applications, reexamination applications,

interference proceedings or opposition proceedings. No party or other person shall disclose or

release to any person not authorized under this Protective Order any Designated Information

governed by this Protective Order for any purpose, or to any person authorized under this

Protective Order for any other purpose.

3.2 While it is understood that counsel for a party may give advice and

opinions to his or her client regarding this litigation based on his or her evaluation of designated

Confidential and Attorneys' Eyes Only information received by the party - provided that such

rendering of advice and opinions shall not reveal the content of such Designated Information

except by prior written agreement with counsel for the producing party - counsel receiving

Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only information under this Protective Order will not in any way

use such Designated Information to provide advice or opinions to in any way facilitate

prosecution of any patents or to otherwise attempt to secure patent claims (e.g., reissue,

reexamination, certificates of correction).

3.3 The attorneys of record for the parties and other persons receiving

Designated Information governed by this Protective Order shall exercise reasonable care to

ensure that the Designated Information governed by this Protective Order is (a) used only for the

purposes specified herein and (b) disclosed only to authorized persons.

3.4 If Designated Information subject to this Protective Order is disclosed to

any person other than in the manner authorized by this Protective Order, the party responsible for

the disclosure must immediately bring all pertinent facts relation to such disclosure to the

attention of the designating party and the Court and, without prejudice to other rights and

remedies of the supplier, make every effort to prevent further disclosure by it or by the person 

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 4 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-5-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

who was the recipient of such information.

4. Disclosure Of Designated Information.

4.1 Information, documents or things designated Confidential shall be

disclosed by the recipient thereof only to:

a. the outside attorneys and patent agents of record for the parties, and

their authorized secretarial, clerical and legal assistant staff;. 

b. up to two employees of each named party (to be identified to the

other parties prior to receipt by the employees of any Designated Information) not involved in the

preparation or prosecution of patent applications, provided that each individual must first agree to

be bound by the terms of this Protective Order; 

c. consultants or experts and their staffs retained by the parties or their

attorneys for purposes of this action, subject to the procedures of paragraph 7, who are not

employees or otherwise affiliated with any of the parties, and who first agree to be bound by the

terms of this Protective Order by executing a Confidentiality Undertaking in the form attached as

Exhibit A hereto,

d. the Court and Court personnel;

e. court reporters employed in connection with this action; 

f. outside copying and computer services necessary for document

handling, and other litigation support personnel (e.g., graphic designers, trial consultants and

animators); and

g. translation services necessary for translating documents in this

action.

4.2 Information, documents or things designated Attorneys' Eyes Only shall be

disclosed only to those categories of individuals listed in paragraph 4.1, excluding subparagraphs 4.1(b).

4.3 No disclosure of Designated Information shall be made to persons in subparagraphs 4.1(b) - (c) and (e) - (g) unless such person has executed a written Confidentiality

Undertaking (in the form set forth in Exhibit A hereto) acknowledging and agreeing to be bound

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 5 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-6-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

by the terms of this Protective Order. Copies of such Confidentiality Undertakings shall be

promptly served on the producing party. Separate Confidentiality Undertakings shall not be

required for staff members working under the supervision of an individual signing a

Confidentiality Undertaking. In any case, the provisions of paragraph 7 must be followed prior to

any disclosure of Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only information to experts, consultants or

their staff.

5. Withholding and Redaction.

Counsel for a party producing documents may withhold documents or mask ("redact")

material deemed exempt from discovery because such documents or material are protected from

disclosure under the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b). 

For withheld documents: the document withheld, along with the protection claimed for the

document and the basis for the protection, shall be reported on a log to be provided within thirty

(30) calendar days after the production of the files from which the withheld documents originate. 

Documents created after the filing date of this action which are protected from disclosure under

the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine need not be included on the privilege log. 

For redacted documents: (i) the produced document must identify the area where redaction has

occurred; and (ii) the identity of the redacted document, the protection claimed for the redacted

portions, and the basis for the protection shall be reported on a log to be provided within thirty

(30) calendar days after the production of the redacted document. In all cases, sufficient

information must be provided to enable the other party to evaluate the legitimacy of the asserted

privilege or immunity.

6. Identification Of Experts.

6.1 If any party desires to disclose information designated Confidential or

Attorney' s Eyes Only to any expert or consultant pursuant to paragraph 4 above, it must first

identify in writing to the attorneys for the producing party each such expert or consultant. Such

identification shall include the full name and professional address and/or affiliation of the

proposed expert or consultant, an up-to-date curriculum vitae, a list of the proposed expert or

consultant's past, current and anticipated consulting relationships (with the exception of damages

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 6 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-7-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

experts), a list of the cases in which the expert or consultant has testified at a deposition or at trial

within the last four years and all prior and/or present relationships between the expert or

consultant and the parties in this case. 

6.2 The attorney for the producing party shall have five (5) business days from

receipt of such notice to object to disclosure of such information to any of the experts or

consultants so identified. Objections shall not be made except where the objecting party has a

good faith belief that it may be harmed by the disclosure of the party's information. Any

objection made to an opposing party shall state in detail the basis for the objection.

6.3 The parties shall attempt to resolve any objections informally. If the

objections cannot be resolved, the objecting party may move the Court for an Order preventing

disclosure to the consultant or expert within ten (10) business days after the objection was made. 

If any such motion is made, the objecting party shall bear the burden of proof. If no such motion

is made within said ten (10) business day period, the consultant or expert shall be permitted to

receive Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only information pursuant to the terms of this Protective

Order. In the event objections are made and not resolved informally and a motion is filed,

disclosure of information to the expert or consultant shall not be made except by Order of the

Court (or to any limited extent upon which the parties may agree).

6.4 The parties agree that expert discovery will be limited to the final expert

report(s) and all information, documents or things upon which the expert relied in preparing the

final expert report(s). The parties agree that an expert's draft reports, notes and other

communications (to the extent not relied upon in preparing the final expert report(s)) will be

excluded from expert discovery unless specifically relied upon in preparing the final expert

report(s). In the event any party withdraws and/or replaces an expert designated under this

provision prior to submission of a report by said expert, the opinions and materials generated by

said expert shall not be subject to discovery

7. Related Documents.

Information, documents or things designated Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only may

include (a) portions of documents, copies, extracts, and complete or partial summaries prepared

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 7 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-8-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

from or containing such information; (b) portions of deposition transcripts and exhibits thereto

which contain or reflect the content of any such documents, copies, extracts or summaries; (c)

portions of briefs, memoranda or any other papers filed with the Court and exhibits thereto which

contain or reflect the content of any such documents, copies, extracts, or summaries; and/or (d)

deposition testimony designated in accordance with paragraph 9.

8. Designation Of Hearing Transcripts And Deposition Transcripts And

Exhibits.

8.1 Deposition transcripts, or portions thereof, may be designated as containing

Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only information subject to this Protective Order either (a) at the

time of such deposition, in which case the transcript of the designated testimony shall be marked

by the reporter with the appropriate legend (see paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2) as the designating party

may direct, or (b) within ten (10) business days after receipt of the official transcript of the

deposition by providing written notice to the reporter and all counsel of record of the specific

pages and lines that contain Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only information, in which case all

counsel receiving such notice shall mark the copies or portions of the designated transcript in

their possession or under their control as directed by the designating party.

8.2 All deposition transcripts not previously designated shall be deemed to be,

and shall be treated as, Attorneys' Eyes Only for a period of fifteen (15) business days after

receipt of the official transcript of the deposition, and the transcript shall not be disclosed by a

non-designating party to persons other than those persons named or approved according to

paragraph 4.2 during that period. Any portions of such transcripts not designated within this time

frame shall not thereafter be treated as Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only information, except

by order of the Court.

8.3 Any party may mark any document or thing containing Confidential or

Attorneys' Eyes Only information as an exhibit to a deposition, hearing or other proceeding,

provided the witness is qualified under the terms of this Protective Order to have access to such

designated material.

8.4 The designating party shall have the right to exclude from a deposition,

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 8 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-9-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

before the taking of testimony which the designating party designates Confidential or Attorneys'

Eyes Only and subject to this Protective Order, all persons other than those persons previously

qualified to receive such information pursuant to paragraph 4. 

8.5 At any court hearing or proceeding no party is prevented by this Protective

Order from moving the Court to close the hearing and designate all or portions of the transcript as

Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only information.

9. Disclosure To Author Or Recipient.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Protective Order, nothing herein shall

prohibit counsel or a party from disclosing a document containing information designated

Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only to any current employee of the producing party or to any

person that the document clearly identifies as an author, addressee, or recipient of such document

or who can be shown by appropriate foundation (without disclosing the contents of the document)

would have received the particular document or would have been expected to know the contents

of particular document based on his/her position. Regardless of the designation pursuant to this

Protective Order, if a document or testimony makes reference to the actual or alleged conduct or

statements of a person who is a potential witness, counsel may discuss the subject matter of such

conduct or statements with such witness without revealing any portion of the contents of the

document or testimony, and such discussion shall not constitute disclosure in violation of this

Protective Order.

10. Confidentiality Of Party's Own Documents.

Nothing herein shall affect the right of the designating party to disclose to its officers,

directors, employees, attorneys, consultants or experts, or to any other person, its own

information. Such disclosure shall not waive the protections of this Protective Order and shall not

entitle other parties or their attorneys to disclose such information in violation of it, unless by

such disclosure by the designating party the information becomes public knowledge. Similarly,

the Protective Order shall not preclude a party from showing its own information to its officers,

directors, employees, attorneys, consultants or experts, or to any other person, which information

has been filed under seal by the opposing party.

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 9 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-10-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

11. Designation Of Documents Under Seal.

Subject to public policy, and further court order, nothing shall be filed under seal, and the

Court shall not be required to take any action, without separate prior order by the Judge before

whom the hearing or proceeding will take place, after application by the affected party with

appropriate notice to opposing counsel. 

If the Court grants a party permission to file an item under seal, a duplicate disclosing all

nonconfidential information shall be filed and made part of the public record. The item may be

redacted to eliminate confidential material from the document. The document shall be titled to

show that it corresponds to an item filed under seal, e.g., "Redacted Copy of Sealed Declaration

of John Smith in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment." The sealed and redacted

documents shall be filed simultaneously.

12. Challenge To Confidentiality.

12.1 This Protective Order shall not preclude any party from seeking and

obtaining, on an appropriate showing, such additional protection with respect to the

confidentiality of documents or other discovery materials as that party may consider appropriate. 

Nor shall any party be precluded from (a) claiming that any matter designated hereunder is not

entitled to the protections of this Protective Order, (b) applying to the Court for an order

permitting the disclosure or use of Designated Information otherwise prohibited by this Protective

Order, or (c) applying for a further order modifying this Protective Order in any respect. No party

shall be obligated to challenge the propriety of any designation, and failure to do so shall not

preclude a subsequent challenge to the propriety of such designation or to the alleged status of

any material as a proprietary and/or trade secret, nor be construed as an admission of same status.

12.2 If a party seeks de-designation of particular items the following procedure

shall be utilized:

a. The party seeking such de-designation shall give counsel of record

for the other party written notice thereof specifying the Designated Information as to which such

removal is sought and the reasons for the request; and

b. If, after conferring, the parties cannot reach agreement concerning

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 10 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-11-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

the matter within five (5) business days after the delivery and receipt of the notice, then the party

requesting the de-designation of particular items may file and serve a motion for a further order of

this Court directing that the designation shall be so removed. On any such motion, the burden of

proof shall lie with the producing party to establish that the information is, in fact, properly

designated as Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only information. 

13. Inadvertent Disclosure Of Work Product Or Privileged Information: 

Procedure And Waiver.

13.1 The inadvertent production or disclosure of any document or thing

otherwise protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product immunity shall not operate as

a waiver of any such privilege or immunity if, after learning of the inadvertent production or

disclosure, the party who made the inadvertent production or disclosure promptly sends to each

receiving party a written request for return of the inadvertently produced or disclosed document

or thing. Upon being notified by the producing party pursuant to this paragraph, counsel for the

non-producing party shall use his or her best efforts to retrieve all copies of the documents at

issue. The receiving party shall return or destroy all copies of such documents within five (5)

business days of such notice and certify such return or destruction in writing to the producing

party. Return of the document by the receiving party shall not constitute an admission or

concession, or permit any inference, that the returned document is, in fact, properly subject to a

claim of attorney-client privilege or work product immunity. 

a. If the receiving party wishes to contest that any such document or

thing was inadvertently produced or is protected by the attorney-client privilege or by work

product immunity, the receiving party shall so notify the producing party in its certification of

return or destruction of the documents or things; 

b. Within five (5) business days after receiving such notification, the

producing party shall provide to the receiving party a list identifying all such returned documents

and things and stating the basis for the claim of privilege or immunity. 

c. Within five (5) business days after receiving such a list, the

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 11 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-12-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

receiving party may file a motion to compel production of such documents and things, the

protection of which is still disputed. If such a motion is filed, the producing party shall have the

burden of proving that the documents and things in dispute are protected by attorney-client

privilege or by work product immunity.

d. With respect to documents and things generated by a receiving

party which contain information derived from such inadvertently produced documents and things,

if the receiving party does not notify the producing party that the receiving party disputes the

claims of attorney-client privilege or work-product immunity, the receiving party shall either

destroy the derivative documents and things or redact from them all such derivative privileged or

immune information in a manner such that the derivative information cannot in any way be

retrieved or reproduced.

14. Inadvertent Failure To Designate.

A producing party or nonparty that inadvertently fails to designate information,

documents or things pursuant to this Protective Order at the time of production may thereafter

make a designation pursuant to this Protective Order by serving notice thereof in writing,

accompanied by substitute copies of each item, appropriately designated, to the receiving party

within five (5) business days of discovery that the information, documents or things were not

properly designated. The receiving party shall not be in violation of this Protective Order for

disclosures made prior to receipt of notification. Those individuals who reviewed the

information, documents or things prior to the notice of misdesignation or failure to designate by

the producing party shall return to counsel for the producing party or destroy and certify

destruction of all copies of the misdesignated information, documents or things within ten (10)

business days after receipt of such notification.

15. Prior Or Public Knowledge.

This Protective Order shall not apply to information that, prior to disclosure, is public

knowledge, and the restrictions contained in this Protective Order shall not apply to information

that is, or after disclosure becomes, public, was in the possession of the party to whom disclosure

is made prior to disclosure or is public knowledge other than by an act or omission of the party to

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 12 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-13-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

whom such disclosure is made, or that is legitimately and independently acquired from a source

not subject to this Protective Order.

16. Limitation Of Protective Order.

This Protective Order is not intended to address discovery objections to produce, answer,

or respond on the grounds of attorney-client privilege or work product immunity, or to preclude

any party from seeking further relief or protective orders from the Court as may be appropriate

under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

17. Other Proceedings.

17.1 By entering this Protective Order and limiting the disclosure of information

in this case, the Court does not intend to preclude another court from finding that information

may be relevant and subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or party subject to this

Protective Order who may be subject to a motion to disclose another party's Confidential or

Attorneys' Eyes Only information pursuant to this Protective Order shall promptly notify that

party of the motion and provide that party with a copy of the motion so that it may have an

opportunity to appear and be heard on whether such information should be disclosed.

17.2 Furthermore, any person or party subject to this Protective Order who is

subject to a subpoena to disclose another party's Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only

information shall promptly notify that party of the existence of the subpoena and provide that

party with a copy of the subpoena so that party may have an opportunity to appear and be heard

on whether such information should be disclosed.

18. Non-Party Material.

The terms of this Protective Order are applicable to Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only

information provided by a non-party. Information provided by a non-party in connection with

this action and designated Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only, pursuant to the terms of this

Protective Order shall be protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Protective Order.

19. Return Of Designated Information.

Within sixty (60) calendar days after the final termination of the last of this action by

unappealable judgment, exhaustion of all appeals or settlement, unless otherwise agreed to in

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 13 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-14-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

writing by an attorney of record for the designating party, each party shall assemble and return, or

certify destruction of, all Designated Information and all other materials containing Designated

Information, including all copies, extracts and summaries thereof, to the party from whom the

designated material was obtained, except that any documents or copies which contain, constitute

or reflect attorney work product or attorney-client privilege communications may be retained by

counsel, subject to a continuing obligation to protect Designated Information pursuant to this

Protective Order.

20. Waiver Or Termination Of Protective Order.

No part of the restrictions imposed by this Protective Order may be waived or terminated,

except by written stipulation executed by counsel of record for each designating party, or by an

order of the Court for good cause shown. 

21. Modification Of Protective Order; Prior Agreements.

This Protective Order may be modified, and any matter related to it may be resolved, by

written stipulation of the parties without further order of the Court. This Protective Order

supersedes any agreements between the parties regarding the confidentiality of particular

information entered into before the date of this Protective Order.

22. Section Captions.

The title captions for each section of this Protective Order are for convenience only and

are not intended to affect or alter the text of the sections or the substance of the Protective Order.

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 14 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-15-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

23. Days.

All references to "days" in this Protective Order shall be construed as calendar days,

unless otherwise specifically indicated.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January __, 2007

DLA PIPER US LLP

By

STEWART M. BROWN

THOMAS A. BURG

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim

Defendant

MOBIAPPS, INC.

Dated: January __, 2007

BLECHER & COLLINS, P.C.

By

MAXWELL M. BLECHER

JOHN E. ANDREWS

JENNIFER S. ELKAYAM

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim

Plaintiff

QUAKE GLOBAL, INC.

Dated: January __, 2007

WINGERT GREBING BRAUBAKER

& GOODWIN LLP

By

ALAN K. BRUBAKER

Attorneys for Cross-Defendant

INTRINSIX, INC. 

Dated: January __, 2007

CHADBOURNE & PARKE LLP

By

SUSAN ST. DENIS

Attorneys for Intervenor

ORBCOMM LLC

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 15 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-16-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 16, 2007

Jan M. Adler

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 16 of 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-17-

CASE NO. C06-1745 LAB (JMA)

EXHIBIT A

MOBIAPPS, INC., a Texas corporation, CV NO. 06-CV-1745 LAB (JMA)

Plaintiff,

PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND

v. PROTECTIVE ORDER

QUAKE GLOBAL, INC., a California

coporation,

Defendant.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

AND CROSS-CLAIMS

CONFIDENTIALITY UNDERTAKING

I have read the Protective Order concerning the confidentiality of information in the above

captioned litigation. I understand that the Protective Order is a Court order designed to preserve

the confidentiality of certain confidential information. I also understand that the Protective Order

restricts the use, disclosure and retention of such confidential information and also requires the

safeguarding and return of documents and other materials containing confidential information.

I agree to comply with all provisions of the Protective Order described above with respect to any

information designated Confidential or Attorneys' Eyes Only that is furnished to me. I hereby

consent to the personal jurisdiction of the United States District Court, Southern District of

California, for any proceedings involving the enforcement of that Protective Order.

EXECUTED this _____ day of _________________, 2007

Name

Signature

Present Employer or Other Business Affiiliation

Business Address

Case 3:06-cv-01745-JLS-JMA Document 63 Filed 01/16/07 Page 17 of 17