Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01787/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01787-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

US_WEST:260040018.2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

MODIFYING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE

DEADLINES (C-04-1787) 

WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY, ESQ. 

LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY 

703 Market Street, Suite 1407 

San Francisco, CA 94103 

Telephone: 415-675-7705 

Facsimile: 415-675-2530 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NANCY ZAYED 

LYNNE C. HERMLE (STATE BAR NO. 99779) 

JOSEPH C. LIBURT (STATE BAR NO. 155507) 

JESSICA R. PERRY (STATE BAR NO. 209321) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: 650-614-7400 

Facsimile: 650-614-7401 

Attorneys for Defendants 

APPLE COMPUTER, INC. and 

DAVID BLACK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NANCY ZAYED, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

APPLE COMPUTERS, a corporation doing 

business in California; DAVID BLACK, an 

individual, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 

Defendants.

Case No. C-04-1787 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CHANGE TIME 

REGARDING EXPERT WITNESS 

DISCLOSURE DEADLINES 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:04-cv-01787-JW Document 99 Filed 07/06/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

US_WEST:260040018.2 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

MODIFYING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE

DEADLINES (C-04-1787) 

The parties hereto, and their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS the Court previously entered a Scheduling Order in this case on 

February 1, 2005 and modified that Scheduling Order on July 22, 2005, October 18, 2005, March 

9, 2006, and on May 9, 2006. 

WHEREAS fact discovery closed on October 3, 2005; 

WHEREAS on May 1, 2006, the Court set the trial date in this matter and trial to 

commence on February 6, 2007; 

WHEREAS the Parties are currently engaged in expert discovery; 

WHEREAS Defendant’s IME will be scheduled beyond June 23, 2006, 

WHEREAS the Parties believe that extending the expert witness deadlines set 

forth in the Court’s May 9, 2006 Order as set forth below will be conducive to the efficient and 

expedient conduct of this litigation, will serve the ends of justice, and will not create any 

substantial delay, and will not affect the Parties’ trial date; and 

WHEREAS the Parties have previously requested four time modifications to the 

Scheduling Order deadlines set by the Court to extend the expert witness deadlines, 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The deadlines set forth in the Court’s May 9, 2006, Scheduling Order shall 

be modified as follows: 

(a) the deadline to disclose expert witnesses related to plaintiff’s 

alleged mental distress pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(a) is August 25, 

2006;

(b) the deadline to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses related to 

plaintiff’s alleged mental distress is September 29, 2006; 

(c) the hearing deadline for motions objecting to the qualifications or 

proposed testimony of experts related to plaintiff’s alleged mental 

distress is December 4, 2006; 

Case 5:04-cv-01787-JW Document 99 Filed 07/06/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

US_WEST:260040018.2 - 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

MODIFYING EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE

DEADLINES (C-04-1787) 

(d) The discovery deadline is October 18, 2006, as to expert discovery, 

and discovery shall remain closed for all non-expert discovery. 

2. This Stipulation shall be made an Order of the Court. 

Dated: June 22, 2006 WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY, ESQ. 

LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY 

 /s/Waukeen McCoy 

Waukeen Q. McCoy 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Nancy Zayed 

Dated: June 22, 2006 LYNNE C. HERMLE 

JOSEPH C. LIBURT 

JESSICA R. PERRY 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

 /s/ Jessica Perry 

Jessica R. Perry 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Apple Computer, Inc. and David Black 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________, 2006 

Hon. James Ware 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

07/06

Case 5:04-cv-01787-JW Document 99 Filed 07/06/06 Page 3 of 3