Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02187/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02187-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER 

CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-02187-WBS-EFB 

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BEYER, PONGRATZ & ROSEN 

3230 Ramos Circle 

Sacramento, CA 95827 

(916) 369-9750 

Etan E. Rosen, Esq. (SBN 173728) 

erosen@bprlaw.net 

Ralph C. Lee, Esq. (SBN 258608) 

rlee@bprlaw.net 

BEYER, PONGRATZ & ROSEN 

A Professional Law Corporation

3230 Ramos Circle 

Sacramento, CA 95827 

Telephone: (916) 369-9750 

Facsimile: (916) 369-9760 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

LAMONT WILLIAMS. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LAMONT WILLIAMS, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY 

DISTRICT a.k.a. SMUD; and DOES 1 

through 20, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-02187-WBS-EFB 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER 

(SUBJECT TO COURT APPROVAL)

Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

 

 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED by and between the parties 

through their respective counsel, that the Scheduling Order, dated February 11, 2015 be 

amended to change page 2, line 19, which presently requires the parties to disclosure 

experts and produce reports by “February 1, 2016,” to “February 16, 2016.” 

 Good cause exists in that the parties have verbally stipulated based, because 

Case 2:14-cv-02187-WBS-DB Document 16 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER 

CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-02187-WBS-EFB 

-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BEYER, PONGRATZ & ROSEN 

3230 Ramos Circle 

Sacramento, CA 95827 

(916) 369-9750 

Plaintiff’s counsel was not proximately aware of the impending date in advance due to a 

calendaring error, and furthermore, because federal rules allow for expert exchange up to 

90 days before trial. (FRCP, § 26(a)(2).) 

DATED: 2/1/2016 BEYER, PONGRATZ & ROSEN 

By: ______/s/_________________________ 

 Ralph C. Lee, 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Lamont Williams 

DATED: 2/1/2016 PORTER SCOTT 

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

By: _________/s/______________________ 

Chambord V. Benton-Hayes 

Attorney for Defendant, 

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY 

DISTRICT 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 3, 2016. 

Case 2:14-cv-02187-WBS-DB Document 16 Filed 02/04/16 Page 2 of 2