Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00253/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00253-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 On July 18, 2006, petitioner submitted a letter in which petitioner asserts that he sent the 1

filing fee to the court before the court issued the April 26, 2006 order. However, petitioner has not

provided a copy of receipt confirming payment or other documentation showing that payment was

sent, and the court’s docket does not reflect that petitioner, at any time, submitted the filing fee for

this action.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LONNIE JAMES SHOULDERS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0253 MCE KJM P

vs.

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL

CENTER, et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed April 26, 2006, petitioner was ordered to file an application to

proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee for this action within thirty days. Petitioner was

cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not complied with the court’s April 26,

2006 order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed 1

without prejudice.

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00253-MCE -KJM Document 8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 3, 2006.

1

shou0253.fff

Case 2:06-cv-00253-MCE -KJM Document 8 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 2