Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02461/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02461-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS LLC, 

et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MICHAEL PICKER, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-02461-VC 

ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION HEARING

At the hearing on the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, the parties should be 

prepared to discuss the following issues: 

1. Is further factual development necessary to decide whether the order that the plaintiffs 

turn over the data at issue in the case to third parties is preempted? And if not, should the Court 

convert the motion for a preliminary injunction into a motion for summary judgment? 

2. Would the plaintiffs object to CPUC hiring an expert to analyze the data for the 

purposes of its investigation, if the result was that the data would not be turned over to TURN 

(and other third parties)? 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 16, 2016 

______________________________________ 

VINCE CHHABRIA 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:16-cv-02461-VC Document 60 Filed 05/16/16 Page 1 of 1