Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02039/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02039-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WALTER W. BOYD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2039 JAM KJM P

vs.

D. FALLTRICK, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed February 25, 2010, plaintiff was granted an extension of time to

file his amended complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded

to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

/////

1

Case 2:09-cv-02039-JAM -KJM Document 13 Filed 04/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 15, 2010. 

1

boyd2039.fta

2

Case 2:09-cv-02039-JAM -KJM Document 13 Filed 04/16/10 Page 2 of 2