Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02177/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02177-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C 03-02177 VRW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jeffrey E. Ostrow (CSB No. 213118) 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

2550 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 251-5000

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002

E-mail: jostrow@stblaw.com

Henry B. Gutman (admitted pro hac vice)

Kerry L. Konrad (admitted pro hac vice)

Victor Cole (admitted pro hac vice)

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

425 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10017

Telephone: (212) 455-2000

Facsimile: (212) 455-2502

E-mail: hgutman@stblaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

3COM CORPORATION

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP

YITAI HU (admitted pro hac vice)

ELIZABETH H. RADER (CSB No. 184963)

SEAN P. DEBRUINE (CSB No. 168071)

MING-TAO YANG (CSB No. 221295)

1950 University Avenue, Suite 505

East Palo Alto, CA 94303

Telephone: (415) 795-9500

Facsimile: (415)765-9501

E-mail:erader@akingump.com

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

3COM CORPORATION,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,

v.

D-LINK SYSTEMS INC.,

and

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR

CORPORATION,

Defendants/Counterplaintiffs.

Case No. C 03-02177 VRW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULE

Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 401 Filed 07/31/2007 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 402 Filed 08/01/07 Page 1 of 4
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ]

ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C 03-02177 VRW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties agreed to a comprehensive pre-trial schedule during the February 6, 

2007 Case Management Conference, but that schedule has not been entered in this action;

WHEREAS, as directed by the Court in its Order of March 27, 2007, and in response to 

3Com’s additional discovery requests served in April 2007, Realtek has produced documents 

including driver code, source code, and technical and financial documents, and has more recently 

produced a large quantity of emails that, pursuant to the parties’ agreement, 3Com is in the process 

of reviewing in their native format; 

WHEREAS, both parties agree that under the circumstances there is a need for additional 

time for both parties to complete fact and expert discovery;

WHEREAS, both parties have agreed to an extension of the current schedule which will 

not require a modification of the hearing date on dispositive motions or of the date of trial; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE and respectfully request 

the Court to order as follows:

1. The parties jointly propose the following schedule:

• August 20–24, 2007 – Continued deposition of Realtek 30(b)(6) witnesses

• September 14, 2007 – Expert reports on subjects for which the party bears the burden 

of proof due

• September 24, 2007 – Close of fact discovery

• October 12, 2007 – Rebuttal expert reports due

• October 18, 2007 – Last day for parties to file dispositive motions

• November 1, 2007 – Close of expert discovery

• November 9, 2007 – Last day for parties to file oppositions to dispositive motions

• November 20, 2007 – Last day for parties to file replies to dispositive motions

• November 29, 2007 – Proposed hearing date for dispositive motions, subject to the 

Court’s availability

• December 11, 2007 – Last day to meet and confer re: Joint Pretrial Statement

• December 21, 2007 – Parties to file Joint Pretrial Statement

• January 8, 2008 – Pretrial Conference

Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 401 Filed 07/31/2007 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 402 Filed 08/01/07 Page 2 of 4
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ]

ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C 03-02177 VRW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

• February 25, 2008 – Start of trial; scheduled for 5 trial days

Dated: July 31, 2007 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

By: /s/

Kerry L. Konrad (pro hac vice)

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

3COM CORPORATION

Dated: July 31, 2007 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP

By: /s/

Elizabeth H. Rader

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty 

of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Elizabeth H. 

Rader.

Dated: July 31, 2007 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

By: /s/

Kerry L. Konrad (pro hac vice)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

3COM CORPORATION

Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 401 Filed 07/31/2007 Page 3 of 4 Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 402 Filed 08/01/07 Page 3 of 4
4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ]

ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C 03-02177 VRW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________, 2007

__________________________________

Honorable Vaughn R. Walker

United States District Judge

Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 401 Filed 07/31/2007 Page 4 of 4

Aug 1

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANTED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 402 Filed 08/01/07 Page 4 of 4