Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07067/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07067-84/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1 .S. DISTRICT COURT CASE NO: 06-07067

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL AND DECLARATION OF

KENNETH FRUCHT IN SUPPORT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Frederick J. Geonetta (SBN 114824)

Kenneth N. Frucht, (SBN 178881) 

GEONETTA & FRUCHT

100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel: (415) 421-4770

Tel: (415) 392-4844

Fax: (415) 421-4785

Fax: (415) 392-7973

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MMCA Group, Ltd.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MMCA GROUP, LTD., a Virginia 

corporation,

Plaintiff

v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a 

Delaware corporation, PICA, an Ohio 

corporation, 

Defendants.

Civil Action No. CV 06-07067-MMC (EMC)

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS TO 

DECLARATIO OF FREDERICK 

GEONETTA IN SUPPORT OF OBJECTION 

TO ANY EVIDENCE RENDERED BY 

MIKHAIL REIDER-GORDON RE 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDMGNET

Date: November 20, 2009

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Place: Courtroom 7, 19th Floor

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(c), Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, and 

the Stipulated Protective Order (“Protective Order”) on file as Docket No. 241, Plaintiff MMCA 

Corporation (“MMCA”) hereby requests permission to file under seal the following documents 

that have previously been designated either Confidential or AEO by one or more of the parties, or 

ORDER GRANTING

JUDGMENT

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 701 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 2
2 .S. DISTRICT COURT CASE NO: 06-07067

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL AND DECLARATION OF

KENNETH FRUCHT IN SUPPORT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

that refer to documents or material that is Confidential or has been designated Confidential by one 

of the parties to this case:

A. Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Frederick Geonetta in Support of Objection

to any Evidence Rendered by Mikhail Reider-Gordon RE Defendants’ Motions for 

Summary Judgment or Alternatively Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

MMCA seeks to file each of the above-referenced documents under seal because they are 

or contain references to documents that have been designated by one of the parties to this lawsuit

as either “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to the procedures 

set forth in the Protective Order, Document No. 241.

Civil Local Rule 79-5 provides where a party seeks to submit to the Court a document that 

has been designated by another party as Confidential pursuant to a protective order, that party 

must file an Administrative Motion for a sealing order. Thereafter, within five days, designating 

party must then file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the designated 

documents are sealable, and must lodge and serve a narrowly tailored proposed sealing order 

within five days of submission. Civ. L.R. 79-5(d).

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff MMCA respectfully asks that the Court enter an order 

permitting MMCA to file the referenced documents under seal.

Dated: November 13, 2009

 By: _______/s/ Kenneth Frucht __________

Kenneth Frucht

Attorney for Plaintiff MMCA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Maxine M. Chesney

Dated: January 5, 2010

Case 3:06-cv-07067-MMC Document 701 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 2