Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00192/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00192-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KULWINDER SINGH, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

ALBERTO R. GONZALEZ, )

)

Respondent. )

)

)

___________________________________ )

1:07-cv-00192-OWW WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE

MOTION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS

[Doc. 8, 9]

Petitioner is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se on a petition for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant ton 28 U.S.C. Section 2241. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

On May 8, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. 

These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty

Case 1:07-cv-00192-OWW -WMW Document 11 Filed 12/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The court notes that the copy of the findings and recommendations served on Petitioner 1

was returned by the United States Postal Service. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service on a

party at their address of record is fully effective.

2

days. Petitioner did not file objections. 

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708

F.2d 452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the th

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

May 8, 2007, are a adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as moot;

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this

case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00192-OWW -WMW Document 11 Filed 12/12/07 Page 2 of 2