Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01819/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01819-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The failure of one or more of the parties to

participate in the preparation of a joint status report does not

excuse the other parties from their obligation to file a status

(continued...)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARDEN CITY BOXING CLUB, INC., )

) 2:05-cv-01819-GEB-DAD

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

v. ) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

) CONFERENCE AND

JOSE OCTAVIO ARIAS, MARIA C. ) FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m) WARNING

SAHAGUN, AND TRINIDAD S. SAHAGUN, )

individually and d/b/a HACIENDA )

TAQUERIA a/k/a TAQUERIA MI )

PUEBLO a/k/a LORCKYS ROTISSERIE, )

)

Defendants. )

)

Plaintiff’s Status Conference Statement filed on November 28,

2005, indicates that Plaintiff has not served all defendants.

Therefore, this case is not ready to be fully scheduled and the Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference currently scheduled for December 12,

2005, is continued to February 21, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status

report shall be filed no later than February 7, 2006.1

Case 2:05-cv-01819-GEB-DAD Document 6 Filed 12/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1(...continued)

report in accordance with this Order. In the event a party or

parties fail to participate as ordered, the party submitting the

status report shall include a declaration explaining why it was

unable to obtain the cooperation of the other party or parties.

2

Further, Plaintiff is hereby notified that any defendant not

served by January 9, 2006, could be dismissed from this action without

prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). To avoid

dismissal, a proof of service shall be filed for each served Defendant

no later than January 12, 2006. If Plaintiff believes he has good cause

to justify extension of Rule 4(m)’s 120-day service period for a

defendant, that shall be shown in a declaration filed no later than

January 12, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 5, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01819-GEB-DAD Document 6 Filed 12/05/05 Page 2 of 2