Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01740/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01740-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

LEGAL_US_W # 56629855.1

JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

USDC ND CAL C06-01740 JW HRL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROBERT B. NICHOLS (SB# 224763)

nichols@nicholslawgroup.com

300 South First Street, Suite 205

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone: (408) 298-9755

Facsimile: (408) 298-9699

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DAVID DAY

STEPHEN H. HARRIS (SB# 184608)

stephenharris@paulhastings.com

CAROLINE L. ELKIN (SB# 209156)

carolineelkin@paulhastings.com

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

515 South Flower Street

Twenty-Fifth Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228

Telephone: (213) 683-6000

Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 Attorneys for Defendant

AT&T DISABILITY INCOME PLAN

(formerly known as SBC DISABILITY INCOME PLAN)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAVID DAY, )

Plaintiff, ) Case No. C 06 01740 JW

)

vs. )

) JOINT STIPULATION AND

) [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

) CONTINUANCE OF FILING 

) DATES FOR OPPOSITION AND 

SBC DISABILITY INCOME PLAN, ) REPLY BRIEFS FOR CROSS

Defendant. ) MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

) JUDGMENT 

WHEREAS, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment in the abovereferenced matter on July 2, 2007;

WHEREAS, in the Court’s Scheduling Order dated April 24, 2007, the opposition briefs 

for the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment are due July 16, 2007 and the reply briefs 

are due July 30, 2007;

WHEREAS, the hearing date for the cross-motions for summary judgment is not until 

September 17, 2007;

Case 5:06-cv-01740-JW Document 40 Filed 07/11/07 Page 1 of 3
LEGAL_US_W # 56629855.1

JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

USDC ND CAL C06-01740 JW HRL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, a scheduling conflict has unexpectedly arisen for defense counsel with 

respect to the July 30, 2007 filing date;

WHEREAS, each party is eager to and has agreed to accommodate the other’s scheduling 

difficulties and both parties have agreed to a continuance of the two upcoming filing dates;

THEREFORE, all parties and their counsel stipulate to and request the Court’s approval 

for a continuance of the filing deadlines for opposition and reply briefs for the cross motions for 

summary judgment as follows:

1. Opposition to Cross Motions for Summary Judgment August 6, 2007

2. Reply to Oppositions to Cross Motions August 27, 2007

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the hearing will remain set for September 17, 

2007 at 9:00 A.M. 

Dated: July 11, 2007 /s/ Robert B. Nichols 

Robert B. Nichols

Attorneys for David Day

Dated: July 11, 2007 /s/ Caroline L. Elkin

Stephen H. Harris

Caroline Elkin

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 5:06-cv-01740-JW Document 40 Filed 07/11/07 Page 2 of 3
LEGAL_US_W # 56629855.1

JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

USDC ND CAL C06-01740 JW HRL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Oppositions to Cross Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed August 6, 2007.

2. Replies to Cross Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed August 27, 2007. 

3. The Hearing Date shall remain September 17, 2007, at 9:00 A. M. or as otherwise determined 

by the Court. 

San Jose, California, this _____ day of ________________, 2007.

_________________________________________

JAMES WARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11 July 

Case 5:06-cv-01740-JW Document 40 Filed 07/11/07 Page 3 of 3