Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00255/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00255-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The United States Postal Service returned the order served on Petitioner on

July 14, 2005, as undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to

Sender - No longer at this facility. However, Petitioner has not notified the court

of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior

address is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(d). 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORENZO L. JONES, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

PAUL M. SCHULTZ, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-00255-AWI-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 21)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On July 5, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DENIED, and that the Clerk of Court be directed to enter judgment

in favor of Respondent. These Findings and Recommendations were

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were

to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of

that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections

to the Findings and Recommendations.1

Case 1:05-cv-00255-AWI -SMS Document 23 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis. The Court notes, however, that

the first sentence of the Findings and Recommendations incorrectly

states that Petitioner is a "state" not "federal" prisoner. That

portion of the recommendation is not adopted and is hereby

corrected. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 5, 2005, are

ADOPTED IN FULL with the above correction;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 23, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00255-AWI -SMS Document 23 Filed 08/23/05 Page 2 of 2