Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02670/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02670-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ANNA’S LINENS’ MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF: MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION

Gordon & Rees LLP 

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111

MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN: 166805) 

BRIAN P. MASCHLER (SBN: 111824) 

VAN T. NGUYEN (SBN: 199945) 

GORDON & REES LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 986-5900 

Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ANNA'S LINENS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CORNELIUS CLARK, CHESTER LEWIS, 

JOHN PONDS and GARRANT COSEY, on behalf 

of themselves and all other similarly situated 

persons,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ANNA'S LINENS, INC., 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-02670 MMC 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 

ANNA’S LINENS, INC.’S MOTION 

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF: 

EXCEEDING PAGE LIMITS ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN 

THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Hearing Date for Underlying Motion:

 February 9, 2007 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

Ctrm: 7 

AIGDO/1034537/1125380v.1 

Case 3:05-cv-02670-MMC Document 107 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ANNA’S LINENS’ MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF: MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION

Gordon & Rees LLP 

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111

Defendant Anna’s Linens, Inc., has filed a Motion for Administrative Relief pursuant to 

Civil Local Rule 7-11(a). In this motion, defendant requests leave to file a Motion for Summary 

Judgment Or In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment that is 31 pages in length, thereby 

exceeding the 25-page limit specified in Civil L.R. 7-2(b). No opposition has been filed. 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, defendant’s Motion is hereby GRANTED. 

DATED: January 12, 2007 __________________________________ 

 HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY, 

 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 3:05-cv-02670-MMC Document 107 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 2