Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03105/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03105-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN YOURKE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 03-03105 CRB

ORDER AND STAY

Now pending before the Court is a second round of cross motions for summary

judgment in this matter. On September 3, 2004, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion for

summary judgment on his Monell claim and granted summary judgment for defendants on

plaintiff’s false arrest claim. On February 23, 2006, the Court issued a Memorandum and

Order in a related case, Mary Bull, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al., No. C

03-1840 CRB, which included a determination as to qualified immunity. As a result of that

Order, plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment in this matter. Thereafter, defendants

cross-moved for summary judgment as to all claims. The Memorandum and Order denying

qualified immunity in Bull is presently on appeal before the Ninth Circuit.

//

//

Case 3:03-cv-03105-CRB Document 96 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2003\3105\order 3 re msj.wpd 2

Good cause appearing, the Court hereby DENIES all motions without prejudice. The

parties may re-notice their motions for summary judgment after the Ninth Circuit issues its

decision in Bull. All discovery shall be stayed until further notice from the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2006

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-03105-CRB Document 96 Filed 06/27/06 Page 2 of 2