Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-02150/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-02150-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT LINCOLN FINANCE COMPANY

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)

Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)

Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor

San Jose, California 95110

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN JOSE DIVISION

NADINE ADKINS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC.; et. al.,

Defendants.

Federal Case No.: 5:16-CV-02150-EJD

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT LINCOLN 

FINANCE COMPANY PURSUANT TO 

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Nadine Adkins, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant Lincoln Finance Company as to all 

claims in this action, with prejudice.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, in relevant part:

41(a) Voluntary Dismissal 

(1) By the Plaintiff

(a) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(3), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any 

applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court 

order by filing: 

(1) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Edward J. Davila

Case 5:16-cv-02150-EJD Document 32 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT LINCOLN FINANCE COMPANY

or a motion for summary judgment. 

Defendant Lincoln Finance Company has neither answered Plaintiff’s Complaint, nor filed 

a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the matter may be dismissed against it, with 

prejudice, for all purposes and without an Order of the Court. 

Dated: June 23, 2016 Sagaria Law, P.C. 

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Nadine Adkins

Case 5:16-cv-02150-EJD Document 32 Filed 06/24/16 Page 2 of 2