Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00152/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00152-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 29:0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

MICHAEL K. HAGEMANN, ESQ. (SBN 264570)

CLAY R. WILKINSON, ESQ. (SBN 269080)

M.K. HAGEMANN, P.C.

1801 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 2400

CENTURY CITY, CA 90067

T. 310.773.4900 | F. 310.773.4901

mhagemann@mkhlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff EDGAR GLOVER 

TERRY A. WILLS, ESQ. (SBN 133962)

COOK BROWN, LLP

555 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 425

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814

T. 916.442.3100 | F. 916.442.4227

twills@cookbrown.com

Attorneys for Defendants THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JANICE A. PARTEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

EDGAR GLOVER, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO, a public 

entity; JANICE A. PARTEN, an individual in her 

individual capacity; CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY 

EMPLOYEES UNION (CSUEU), a California 

corporation and labor organization; and DOES 1-150,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-CV-000152-SAB

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING RULE 

26(F) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff EDGAR GLOVER (“Plaintiff”) Defendants THE 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JANICE A. PARTEN (“Defendants”) by and 

through their counsel of record, that the Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for November 9, 2015 be 

Case 1:15-cv-00152-SAB Document 43 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

continued for 60 days or as soon thereafter as the matter can be scheduled. 

Good cause exists for the continuance as Plaintiff and Defendants CSUF and Janice Parten, by and 

through their counsel of record, are continuing to negotiate the content of the pleadings. On September 

28, the court granted Defendant CSUEU’s Motion to Dismiss without leave to amend. On September 30, 

Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to file a Third Amended Complaint. The motion is scheduled to be heard 

on November 4, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. 

The parties have recently stipulated and the court granted an additional 14 days from either (1) the 

filing date of Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, or (2) the filing of the Court’s order denying Plaintiff’s 

Motion for Leave to Amend, for Defendants to file a responsive pleading. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the November 9, 2015 Scheduling Conference should be continued a 

minimum of 60 days to allow for these pleading issues to be resolved and responses filed. All other 

deadlines triggered by the Scheduling Conference shall also be continued, to include the Rule 26(f) 

conference and Joint Scheduling Report. 

DATED: October 14, 2015 M.K. HAGEMANN, P.C.

MICHAEL K. HAGEMANN, ESQ. 

CLAY R. WILKINSON, ESQ.

By: /s/ Clay Wilkinson

Attorneys for Plaintiff

EDGAR GLOVER 

DATED: October 14, 2015 COOK BROWN, LLP

TERRY A. WILLS, ESQ. 

By: /s/ Terry A. Wills

Attorneys for Defendants

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE 

UNIVERSITY and JANICE A. PARTEN 

Case 1:15-cv-00152-SAB Document 43 Filed 10/14/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, the Rule 26(f) scheduling Conference set for November 9, 2015 be continued to

January 26, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 14, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00152-SAB Document 43 Filed 10/14/15 Page 3 of 3