Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01839/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01839-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE CASE NO. 3:06-CV-01839 CRB 

ELANTECH’S AMENDED ANSWER TO SYNAPTICS’ COUNTERCLAIMS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Yitai Hu (California Admission Pending) (yhu@akingump.com) 

Sean P. DeBruine (SBN 168071) (sdebruine@akingump.com) 

Hsin-Yi Cindy Feng (SBN 215152) (cfeng@akingump.com) 

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400 

Palo Alto, California 94306 

Telephone: 650-838-2000 

Facsimile: 650-838-2001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

ELANTECH DEVICES CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ELANTECH DEVICES CORP., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

SYNAPTICS, INC., AVERATEC, INC., and 

PROSTAR COMPUTER, INC., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 3:06-CV-01839 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE ELANTECH’S 

AMENDED ANSWER TO SYNAPTICS’S 

COUNTERCLAIMS 

Case 5:06-cv-01839-PVT Document 61 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE CASE NO. 3:06-CV-01839 CRB 

ELANTECH’S AMENDED ANSWER TO SYNAPTICS’ COUNTERCLAIMS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Elantech Devices Corp. 

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Synaptics, Inc. and Averatec, Inc., by and through their respective 

attorneys of record, that Plaintiff may file a First Amended Answer to Synaptics’ Counterclaims, 

a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Agreement to this stipulation shall not be 

construed in any way as an admission of the merit or truth of any of the allegations contained in 

the amended pleading.

Dated: November 21, 2006 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Sean P. DeBruine 

Attorney For Plaintiff 

ELANTECH DEVICES CORPORATION 

Dated: November 21, 2006 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By: /s/ 

Karl J. Kramer 

Attorney For Defendant 

SYNAPTICS, INC. 

Dated: November 21, 2006 COHEN & GRESSER LLP 

By: /s/ 

Karen H. Bromberg 

Attorney For Defendant 

AVERATEC, INC. 

Case 5:06-cv-01839-PVT Document 61 Filed 11/27/06 Page 2 of 3
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE CASE NO. 3:06-CV-01839 CRB 

ELANTECH’S AMENDED ANSWER TO SYNAPTICS’ COUNTERCLAIMS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 I hereby attest, pursuant to Section X of General Order 45, that concurrence in the filing 

of this document has been obtained from Karl J. Kramer and Karen H. Bromberg. 

Dated: November 21, 2006 By: /s/ 

 Sean P. DeBruine 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 It is hereby ORDERED that pursuant to a stipulation of Plaintiff Elantech Devices 

Corp. and Defendants Synaptics, Inc. and Averatec, Inc., Plaintiff may file its First Amended 

Answer to Synaptics’ Counterclaims. 

Dated:___________________ _______________________________________ 

 Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

 United States District Judge 

November 22, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 5:06-cv-01839-PVT Document 61 Filed 11/27/06 Page 3 of 3