Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06423/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06423-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ROBERT OLINS, et al.,

Defendants, /

No. C-07-6423 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS

ROBERT OLINS AND ARGYLE CAPITAL

MANAGEMENT CORP. TO LODGE

CHAMBERS COPIES IN COMPLIANCE

WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On September 11, 2009, defendants Robert Olins and Argyle Capital Management

Corp. filed opposition to plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment, and on September

25, 2009, filed a motion for partial summary judgment on defendants’ behalf. Defendants

have violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to

deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that

the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name,

case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also

Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of the above-referenced

Case 3:07-cv-06423-MMC Document 109 Filed 10/05/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

documents. Defendants are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply with

General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Order to provide chambers copies of

electronically-filed documents, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited

to, striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has

not been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 5, 2009 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-06423-MMC Document 109 Filed 10/05/09 Page 2 of 2