Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-05149/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-05149-54/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SECURITY ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET 

AL., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 11-cv-05149-YGR 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING 

IN PART ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO 

SEAL IN CONNECTION WITH FURTHER 

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

Re: Dkt. Nos. 405, 408, 411 

Plaintiff ADT Security Services, Inc. filed an Administrative Motion to File Under Seal 

(Dkt. No. 405) and an Amended Administrative Motion to File Materials Under Seal (Dkt. No. 

408) in connection with its Supplemental Brief in Further Support of ADT's Application for an 

Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Should Not be Found in Contempt of the Court's October 1, 

2013 Order. Defendants Security One International Inc. and Claudio Hand likewise filed their 

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in connection with their supplemental briefing on the 

same matter. (Dkt. No. 411.) 

The Court having carefully considered those motions, and the declarations submitted in 

support thereof, finds that compelling reasons have not been established for sealing the deposition 

and documentary evidence as set forth in this Court’s Order on Cross-Motions For Orders To 

Show Cause RE: Contempt Of Permanent Injunction And Protective Order (Dkt. No. 412, 

“Contempt Order”.) Therefore, the Court ORDERS that the motions to seal are DENIED IN PART 

and the following documents shall be filed on the public docket forthwith: 

 the unredacted version of Security One’s Response to ADT’s Supplemental Brief In Further 

Support of ADT’s Application (Dkt. No. 411-6); 

Case 4:11-cv-05149-YGR Document 413 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

 the unredacted version of the Declaration of John O’Bryan ISO Defendants’ Reply to ADT’s 

Supplemental Brief and all exhibits thereto (Dkt. No. 411-7); 

 the unredacted Supplemental Brief in Further Support of ADT’s Application for an Order to 

Show Cause Why Defendant Should Not Be Found in Contempt of the Court’s October 1, 

2013 Order (Dkt. No. 408-8); 

 the unredacted Declaration of Matthew J. Vanis, including: 

-- Exhibits 2 and 3 to that declaration in their entirety; and 

-- Exhibit 1, the deposition transcript of Emanuel Alexander Troise, III, to the extent 

portions of that deposition are cited and discussion in the Court’s Contempt Order. (Dkt. Nos. 

408-9 to 408-12.) As to any portions of the deposition transcript not cited in the Contempt Order, 

those portions are ORDERED SEALED on the grounds that they are proprietary business information 

of third party UTC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

This terminates Docket Nos. 405, 408, and 411. 

Dated: October 19, 2016 

______________________________________ 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-05149-YGR Document 413 Filed 10/19/16 Page 2 of 2