Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00559/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00559-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CRAIG SCHUB, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. )

)

ERNEST MERRILL, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

)

 )

1: 05-CV-00559-AWI-SMS

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION

TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT

AND FOR SANCTIONS AND DEEMING

MOTION SUBMITTED (DOC. 5)

Vacated Date of Hearing:

September 9, 2005

Plaintiffs are proceeding with a civil action in this Court.

The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302(c)(1) and 72-303.

Pursuant to Rule 78-230(h) of the Local Rules of Practice

for the United States District Court, Eastern District of

California, the Court finds that Plaintiffs’ motion to remand the

action to state court and for sanctions is a matter that may

appropriately be submitted upon the record and briefs.

Accordingly, the hearing on the motion, presently set for

September 9, 2005, IS VACATED.

The motion to remand the action to state court IS DEEMED

SUBMITTED to the Court for consideration and preparation of

findings and recommendations by the Magistrate Judge and for

Case 1:05-cv-00559-AWI -SMS Document 15 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

decision by the District Judge after an appropriate time for the

filing of objections and any reply thereto has passed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00559-AWI -SMS Document 15 Filed 08/09/05 Page 2 of 2