Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03205/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03205-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANDRA J. SPRINGS, Individually, and as

Successor-in-Interest to Marian C. Chapman,

Decedent, and as Executor of the Estate of

Marian C. Chapman,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MERCK 7 COMPANY, INC., a corporation;

McKESSON HBOC, a corporation;

McKESSON CORPORATION, a corporation;

PROCARE PHARMACY, a business entity;

DOE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES 1

through 50, INCLUSIVE; DOE

PHARMACIES 51 through 100, inclusive; and

DOES 101 through 200, inclusive, 

Defendants. /

No. C 05-03205 JSW

ORDER RE BRIEFING

SCHEDULE FOR PENDING

MOTIONS 

The Court having received Defendant’s motion to stay and Plaintiff’s motion to remand,

finds that both motions should be addressed on December 16, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. Therefore, the

hearing date for Defendant’s motion to stay of December 2, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. is HEREBY

VACATED. The Case Management Conference, currently set for December 9, 2005 at 1:30

p.m. is HEREBY CONTINUED to December 16, 2005 at 9:00 a.m., immediately following the

hearing on the outstanding motions.

In addition, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that both parties’ opposition briefs shall be

due on October 28, 2005, and the parties’ replies, if any, shall be due on November 4, 2005. If

the Court determines that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument, it will so 
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

advise the parties in advance of the December 16, 2005 hearing date. If the parties wish to

modify this schedule, they may submit for the Court’s consideration a stipulation and proposed

order demonstrating good cause for any modification requested.

In addition, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have filed the identical motion to remand four

times. Therefore, docket entries numbers 7, 18 and 19 are terminated as duplicative.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 14, 2005 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE