Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04158/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04158-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

04972/1958038.1 Case No. C-05-04158 MHP 

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TIME TO 

COMPLETE DEPOSITION DISCOVERY 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

 Adrian M. Pruetz (Bar No. 118215) 

 Jeffrey N. Boozell (Bar No. 199507) 

865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 

Telephone: (213) 443-3000 

Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 

E-Mail: adrianpruetz@quinnemanuel.com 

 jeffboozell@quinnemanuel.com 

 Robert W. Stone (Bar No. 163513) 

 Brian C. Cannon (Bar No. 193071) 

 T.J. Chiang (Bar No. 235165) 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 

Redwood Shores, California 94065 

Telephone: (650) 801-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 

E-Mail: robertstone@quinnemanuel.com 

 briancannon@quinnemanuel.com 

 tjchiang@quinnemanuel.com 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; Roche 

Diagnostics Corporation; and Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND 

STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC.; ROCHE 

DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION; ROCHE 

DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC., 

Defendants. 

ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC. ROCHE 

DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION; ROCHE 

DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC., 

Counterclaimants, 

vs. 

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND 

STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY; AND 

THOMAS MERIGAN. 

Counterclaim Defendants. 

 CASE NO. C-05-04158 MHP 

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND 

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TIME 

TO COMPLETE DEPOSITION 

DISCOVERY 

Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 69 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

04972/1958038.1 -1- Case No. C-05-04158 MHP

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TIME TO 

COMPLETE DEPOSITION DISCOVERY 

WHEREAS, the Court has suggested that the parties stipulate to extend the discovery 

cutoff and briefing schedule for 30 days beyond the dates set forth in the Stipulation filed on 

August 24, 2006; and 

WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend the discovery cutoff as recommended provided 

that absent agreement of the parties there shall be no further extensions requested or granted; 

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The deadline for completion of deposition discovery shall be extended from 

September 14, 2006 to October 13, 2006. 

2. During the extension provided for by this stipulation, the parties may complete 

deposition discovery that is currently outstanding. Additional depositions shall not be noticed or 

scheduled as a result of this stipulation absent agreement of the parties or order of the Court. 

3. No party shall be deemed to have waived, as a result of this stipulation, any of its 

objections to currently noticed depositions, including objections based on the appropriateness of 

those depositions or the timeliness of the service of the notices of deposition and/or subpoenas. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / /

Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 69 Filed 09/22/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

04972/1958038.1 -2- Case No. C-05-04158 MHP

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TIME TO 

COMPLETE DEPOSITION DISCOVERY 

The schedule for submitting briefs and for the hearing on the Motions for Summary Judgment 

relating to the first phase of this case shall be amended as follows: 

Identification of Topics for 

Summary Judgment October 20, 2006 

Opening Summary Judgment 

Briefs October 27, 2006 

Responsive Briefs November 15, 2006 

Hearing December 4, 2006 

Dated: September 14, 2006 COOLEY GODWARD LLP 

STEPHEN C. NEAL 

RICARDO RODRIGUEZ 

MICHELLE S. RHYU 

/S/ 

Michelle S. Rhyu 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim 

Defendant The Board of Trustees of the Leland 

Stanford Junior University and Counterclaim 

Defendant Thomas Merigan 

Dated: September 15, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

ADRIAN M. PRUETZ 

JEFFREY N. BOOZELL 

ROBERT W. STONE 

/S/ 

Robert W. Stone 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim 

Plaintiff Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; Roche 

Diagnostics Corporation; and Roche Diagnostics 

Operations, Inc. 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 HONORABLE MARILYN HALL PATEL 

 United States District Court Judge 

9/21/2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 69 Filed 09/22/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

04972/1958038.1 -3- Case No. C-05-04158 MHP

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND TIME TO 

COMPLETE DEPOSITION DISCOVERY 

Attestation of E-Filed Signature 

I, Robert W. Stone, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file a Stipulation 

Re: Extension of Briefing Schedule and Time to Complete Deposition Discovery. In 

compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michelle Rhyu has concurred in the 

filing. 

DATED: September 15, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

 By /S/ 

 Robert W. Stone 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; Roche Diagnostics 

Corporation; and Roche Diagnostics 

Operations, Inc. 

Case 3:05-cv-04158-MHP Document 69 Filed 09/22/06 Page 4 of 4