Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00984/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00984-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE S. LOUIE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0984 DFL DAD PS

vs.

ROBERT A. CARICHOFF, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On March 16, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis. The court further notes that the case raises serious comity concerns; as a general

matter, problems in a state court litigation should be handled within that litigation rather than by

Case 2:05-cv-00984-JAM-DAD Document 23 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

suit in federal court with the potential for interference in the operation of the state civil justice

system.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 16, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted and this entire action is dismissed

with prejudice; and

3. Defendants’ request for an order declaring plaintiff a vexatious litigant is

denied without prejudice.

DATED: 8/9/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00984-JAM-DAD Document 23 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 2