Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-01608/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-01608-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM LOFTUS ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SUNRUN INC. ET AL,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:19-cv-01608-YGR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING 

ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW 

CAUSE 

Re: Dkt. No. 39

TO: DEFENDANT MEDIA MIX 365, LLC AND ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, 

SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES AND ATTORNEYS AND ALL THOSE IN ACTIVE CONCERT 

OR PARTICIPATION WITH IT: 

YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED to preserve all evidence, including, but not limited to, 

call and lead logs, call recordings, and consumer complaints pertaining to solar telemarketing

and/or lead generation. You are hereby ordered to preserve all such evidence that you would 

have otherwise destroyed pursuant to the Stipulation of Entry of Order for Permanent Injunction 

and Civil Penalty Judgment in United States v. Media Mix 365, LLC, Case No. 8:19-cv-01243-

GW-JEM (C.D. Cal. June 21, 2019), ECF No. 2 ("Stipulated Injunction").

YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED to show cause why a preliminary injunction should 

not issue enjoining you from failing to preserve the evidence described above. Written 

response to be filed by July 12, 2019. Hearing on the preliminary injunction to be held on 

July 16, 2019, at 2:00 p.m., Courtroom One, U.S. District Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, 

Oakland, California. 

The Court finds this Order consistent with the exception stated in the Stipulated Injunction, 

Case 3:19-cv-01608-RS Document 41 Filed 07/02/19 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants, Defendants’ 

officers, agents, and employees, and all other Persons in active 

concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual 

notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, are 

permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly: 

A. Disclosing, using, or benefitting from customer

information, including the name, address, telephone number, email 

address, social security number, other identifying information, or 

any data that enables access to a customer’s account (including a 

credit card, bank account, or other financial account), that any 

Defendant obtained prior to entry of this Order in connection with 

Telemarketing; and 

B. Failing to destroy such customer information in all

forms in their possession, custody, or control within 30 days after 

entry of this Order. 

Provided, however, that customer information need not be 

disposed of, and may be disclosed, to the extent requested by a

government agency or required by law, regulation, or court order.

In issuing this temporary restraining order, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have shown that 

they and putative class members will suffer immediate and irreparable injury if the documents at 

issue are destroyed. In particular, the Court finds that the evidence at issue is relevant to the 

investigation and prosecution of the individual and putative class claims arising under the 

Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (“TCPA”), and the California Invasion of 

Privacy Act (“CIPA”), Cal. Penal Code § 632.7.

The Court further finds that no security is required of Plaintiffs on account of this order 

as it is consistent with defendant's obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and

Federal Rules of Evidence. 

This Order is effective immediately and shall expire 14 days from the day it is entered. 

Plaintiffs are ORDERED to serve this Order, the summons and complaint, and all supporting

pleadings and papers on Defendant Media Mix 365, LLC by ________________. 

July 5, 2019

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 2, 2019 ___________________________________

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

which provides, in pertinent part: 

Case 3:19-cv-01608-RS Document 41 Filed 07/02/19 Page 2 of 2