Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00530/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00530-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDEL SADSAD SANTOS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0530 LKK DAD P

vs.

KUMA J. DEBOO, et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed May 9, 2007, petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad

subjiciendum was dismissed and thirty days’ leave to file a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and

petitioner has not filed his § 2255 petition or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:07-cv-00530-LKK -DAD Document 8 Filed 06/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 26, 2007.

DAD:4

sant0530.fta

Case 2:07-cv-00530-LKK -DAD Document 8 Filed 06/26/07 Page 2 of 2