Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-01948/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-01948-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

18cv1948-LAB (WVG)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E. D., a minor, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT,

Defendant.

Case No.: 18cv1948-LAB (WVG)

ORDER STRIKING PROPOSED 

ORDER; AND

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties filed a joint motion to dismiss (Docket no. 24), and an unsigned 

proposed order granting the motion. (Docket no. 25.) Proposed orders are not to 

be filed in the docket, see Electronic Case Filing Procedures Manual, § 2(h), and 

the proposed order is ORDERED STRICKEN. The Clerk is directed to remove it 

from the docket.

The joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE, and the parties shall each bear their own costs and attorney’s fees. 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:18-cv-01948-LAB-WVG Document 26 Filed 07/26/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

18cv1948-LAB (WVG)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Although the joint motion recites certain terms of the parties’ settlement 

agreement, the Court does not retain jurisdiction to interpret or enforce the 

settlement agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2019

Hon. Larry Alan Burns

Chief United States District Judge

Case 3:18-cv-01948-LAB-WVG Document 26 Filed 07/26/19 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2