Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00217/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00217-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID SLAUGHTER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-0217 DFL KJM P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed several requests for discovery. Plaintiff is informed that court

permission is not necessary for discovery requests and that neither discovery requests served on

an opposing party nor that party's responses should be filed until such time as a party becomes

dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the court based on the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties shall not be filed with the court unless, and

until, they are at issue. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s March 30, 2006 “motion

for discovery;” April 5, 2006 “motion for discovery; ” April 7, 2006 “request for admissions;”

and April 10, 2006 “request for the production of documents” be placed in the court’s file and

disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as

/////

Case 2:03-cv-00217-DFL -KJM Document 57 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

DATED: April 12, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1/mp

slau0217.411

Case 2:03-cv-00217-DFL -KJM Document 57 Filed 04/13/06 Page 2 of 2