Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05211/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05211-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CRAIG YATES

and DISABILITY RIGHTS 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION, 

SERVICES: HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CRAIG YATES, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES:HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HELLER’S FOR CHILDREN INC., a

California corporation, 

Defendants. ___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-5211 PJH 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Mutual Settlement Agreement and Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own costs

and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction

over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375

(1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement

agreements).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through

their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: September 14, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ 

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARSHALL LOSKOT

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS

DATED: September 14, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF KELLY LYNCH

By: /s/ 

Kelly Lynch

Attorneys for Defendants HELLER’S FOR

CHILDREN INC., a California corporation

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: _____________, 2005 

Hon. Phyllis Hamilton

UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE September 14