Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_02-cv-00494/USCOURTS-azd-2_02-cv-00494-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

VERNON HARRIS, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF

ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY

OF MARICOPA; et al., 

Defendants. _________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CIV 02-0494-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Correct the Docket. (Dkt. 326.) 

Defendants contend they have discovered “what appear to be errors in the docket entries,” and

request those entries be corrected. With one exception, the Court denies this request:

1. Docket numbers 235, 236, 237, 238, and 240 do appear on the Court’s docket.

Thus, no correction is warranted.

2. All five exhibits attached to docket number 285 appear on the document

maintained in the computer database. Thus, no correction is warranted.

3. Although the “file dates” for docket numbers 294, 298 through 300, and 316

through 320 are do not appear to be the dates on which such documents were

filed, and most likely refer to the date such documents were sealed, the filing

dates may not be corrected because it would alter the docket numbers assigned

to those documents. Throughout the pendency of this case, the Court has cited

to documents by their assigned docket numbers. To reorganize the docket

Case 2:02-cv-00494-SMM Document 334 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

numbers at this point in the case would unnecessarily interfere with these

proceedings by rendering citation of documents in the Court’s previous orders

unintelligible. Thus, no correction is warranted.

4. Document number 297 is a response to document number 236, not document

number 235 as the docket reflects. This error can be corrected without disturbing

the docket numbers of other documents. Thus, this error warrants correction. 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART

Defendants’ Motion to Correct the Docket as detailed below. (Dkt. 326.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall correct docket entry number

297 to reflect that it is a response to document number 236, not document number 235.

DATED this 7th day of July, 2006.

Case 2:02-cv-00494-SMM Document 334 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2