Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00349/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00349-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV F-07-0349 LJO

KENNETH E. KELLER (State Bar No. 71450) kkeller@kksrr.com

CHRISTOPHER T. HOLLAND (State Bar No. 164053) cholland@kksrr.com

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP

114 Sansome Street, 4 Floor th

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 249-8330

Facsimile: (415) 249-8333

Attorneys for Defendants

PROGRESSIVE DAIRY SOLUTIONS, INC.;

MATTHEW BUDINE; LUCIANA JONKMAN;

and BRIAN SUNDBERG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(FRESNO DIVISION)

CARGILL INCORPORATED and CAN

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PROGRESSIVE DAIRY SOLUTIONS, INC.;

DIVERSIFIED DAIRY SOLUTIONS, LLC;

MATTHEW BUDINE; DOUGLAS

DEGROFF; LUCIANA JONKMAN; TODD

SCHWEGEL; and BRIAN SUNDBERG,

Defendants.

Case No.: CV-F-07-0349 LJO

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME IN

WHICH PARTIES MAY FILE A 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Pursuant to Rules 6-144 and 83-143 of the General Local Rules of the Eastern District of

California and subject to approval of the Court, Plaintiffs CARGILL INCORPORATED and CAN

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants PROGRESSIVE DAIRY SOLUTIONS,

INC., DIVERSIFIED DAIRY SOLUTIONS, LLC, MATTHEW BUDINE, DOUGLAS DEGROFF,

LUCIANA JONKMAN, and BRIAN SUNDBERG (“Defendants”) hereby stipulate to extend the

time by which the parties must file a [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order with the Court. 

Case 1:07-cv-00349-LJO-SMS Document 49 Filed 04/05/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV F-07-0349 LJO

In its Order dated March 27, 2007, the Court set a deadline of March 30, 2007 by which the

parties were to prepare and submit a Stipulated Protective Order. The Order further provided that if

the parties were unable to reach agreement by that date, the parties were to arrange a conference call

with the Court to address the Protective Order.

Although the parties have not yet reached final agreement the terms of the Protective Order,

the parties believe they will be able to do so without requiring intervention from the Court. 

Consequently, the parties hereby request that the Court extend the deadline for filing the Protective

Order until Wednesday, April 4, 2007.

This Stipulation is not entered into for purposes of delay, and will not alter the date of any

event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. By entering into this stipulation, neither

Plaintiffs nor Defendants waive any rights, claims or defenses they may have in this action. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

Dated: April 2, 2007

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP

By: 

/S/ KENNETH E. KELLER, ESQUIRE_

Kenneth E. Keller

Attorneys for PROGRESSIVE DAIRY SOLUTIONS, 

INC., MATTHEW BUDINE, LUCIANA JONKMAN, 

and BRIAN SUNDBERG 

Dated: April 2, 2007

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: 

/S/ DAVID J. MICLEAN, ESQUIRE (as

authorized on March 30, 2007) _____________

David J. Miclean

Attorneys for CARGILL INCORPORATED and 

CAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case 1:07-cv-00349-LJO-SMS Document 49 Filed 04/05/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV F-07-0349 LJO

Dated: April 2, 2007 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE &

CARRUTH LLP

By: __/S/ GREGORY S. MASON, ESQUIRE_________

 __ (as authorized on April 1, 2007)______________ 

Gregory S. Mason 

Attorneys for DOUGLAS DeGROFF and

DIVERSIFIED DAIRY SOLUTIONS, LLP

Dated: April 2, 2007 KEEGIN HARRISON SCHOPPERT SMITH KARNER LLP

By: _/S/ WENDY L. WYSE, ESQUIRE__ 

 __(as authorized on March 30, 2007)_______________ 

Wendy L. Wyse 

Attorneys for TOD SCHWEGEL 

THE COURT HAS RECEIVED AND REVIEWED THE STIPULATION

OF COUNSEL. THE COURT NOTES THAT ACCORDING TO THE

ORDER OF MARCH 27, 2007, THE PARTIES WERE REQUIRED TO

TO SUBMIT A STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH THE 

COURT ON MARCH 30, 2007. THE DEADLINE SET IN THE ORDER

WAS IGNORED. FURTHER ORDERS ARE EXPECTED TO BE 

FOLLOWED, AND DEADLINES MET.

THE PROPOSED EXTENSION TO APRIL 4, 2007 GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 3, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00349-LJO-SMS Document 49 Filed 04/05/07 Page 3 of 3