Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00458/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00458-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND PEREZ, 

Plaintiff,

v.

JUNIOUS,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00458-AWI-JLT (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

LEAVE TO AMEND AND TO COUNT AS A 

STRIKE PER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) FOR FAILURE 

TO STATE A CLAIM

(Docs. 18, 19)

ORDER DIRECTING CASE CLOSURE

Plaintiff, Raymond Perez, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed his 

Second Amended Complaint on January 8, 2015, alleging a violation of the Eighth Amendment

and his rights to due process. Doc. 18. On April 1, 2015, the Magistrate Judge screened it and 

recommended dismissal without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. Doc. 19. The 

Findings and Recommendation was served that same date and allowed for filing of objections 

within thirty days. Id. Despite lapse of more than the time granted, Plaintiff failed to file any 

objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Case 1:14-cv-00458-AWI-JLT Document 20 Filed 07/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, issued on April 1, 2015 (Doc. 19), is adopted in 

full;

2. This action is dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim; 

3. Dismissal of this action counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 2, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00458-AWI-JLT Document 20 Filed 07/06/15 Page 2 of 2