Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02012/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02012-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 05:7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ABRAR ELAHI SIDDQUI, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF FREMONT, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-02012-JSC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO 

PROSECUTE

Plaintiffs Abrar Siddqui and Rahila Khan bring this civil action against Defendants the 

City of Fremont and Leonard Powell as the Community Preservation Manager for City of 

Fremont. (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. 

No. 10.) After Plaintiffs failed to file a response to the motion within the time allotted under 

Local Rule 7-3, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiffs to file their opposition or statement 

of non-opposition by July 21, 2016. Plaintiffs failed to do so. 

Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should 

not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(b). Plaintiffs shall file a written response to this Order by August 1, 2016. Failure to respond 

to this Order will result in the dismissal of this action. See Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 

F.3d 983, 991 (9th Cir. 1999). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2016

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cv-02012-JSC Document 19 Filed 07/25/16 Page 1 of 1