Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-00145/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-00145-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT— Case Nos. MDL-1423, 02-00145 

E-filed on 6/13/07 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE CYGNUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS

TECHNOLOGY, LLC, PATENT

LITIGATION

______________________________________

CYGNUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS

TECHNOLOGY, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TELECOM LTD., et al., 

Defendants.

No. MDL-1423

This Judgment Applies to:

 C-02-00145 RMW

AMENDED JUDGMENT

On March 30, 2007, pursuant to its Claim Construction Order and Orders on Various

Summary Judgment Motions dated March 29, 2007, the court purported to enter final judgment

declaring that the patents-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 5,883,964 and U.S. Patent No. 6,035,027, are

invalid under the on-sale bar of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and that defendant International Telecom Ltd.

does not infringe either patent. 

The court's judgment did not address the remaining declaratory judgment counterclaims

brought by defendant International Telecom Ltd. against plaintiff seeking declarations that the

patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 and 112 and that the patents are not enforceable due

Case 5:02-cv-00145-RMW Document 234 Filed 06/13/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT— Case Nos. MDL-1423, 02-00145 

2

to inequitable conduct and breach of the duty of candor to the patent office. The court inadvertently

failed to include a direction for final entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. § 54(b) on the

claims resolved. Therefore, the court hereby directs that final judgment be entered: (1) declaring the

'964 and '027 patents invalid based upon the on-sale bar; and (2) adjudging that plaintiff take nothing

on its claim of patent infringement. The court expressly determines that there is no just reason for

delay in the entry of final judgment because the remaining counterclaims have been rendered moot

and will only become ripe for decision if this judgment is reversed.

 

DATED: 6/13/07 

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:02-cv-00145-RMW Document 234 Filed 06/13/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT— Case Nos. MDL-1423, 02-00145 

3

A copy of this judgment was mailed on 6/13/07 to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

John P. Sutton

2421 Pierce Street

San Francisco, CA 94115-1131

Counsel for Defendants:

John F. Mardula, Jon L. Roberts 

Roberts Mardula & Wertheim, LLC 

11800 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 1000 

Reston, VA 20191-5302 

Courtesy Copy:

Clerk of the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building

One Columbus Circle, N.E.

Room G-255, North Lobby

Washington, DC 20002-8004

Counsel is responsible for distributing copies of this order to co-counsel, as necessary.

Case 5:02-cv-00145-RMW Document 234 Filed 06/13/07 Page 3 of 3