Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01208/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01208-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEXANDRA FERREIRA DA SILVA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HEIDI C. MORGAN,

Defendant.

No. 2:21-cv-1208-KJM-CKD PS

ORDER

Defendant has answered the complaint. (ECF No. 47.) Within 30 days from the date of 

this order, the parties shall meet, in person or by telephone, as required by Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 26. Within 7 days after the parties’ Rule 26 meeting, the parties shall file a Joint Status 

Report1 for the purpose of the court’s entry of a pretrial scheduling order. The joint status report 

shall address the relevant portions of Local Rule 240(a). The parties may request a hearing before 

the Magistrate Judge or may request that the pretrial scheduling order issue without a hearing 

before the Magistrate Judge.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Within 30 days from the date of this order, the parties shall meet, in person or by 

telephone, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.

1 If the parties are unable to file a joint status report, they may file separate status reports.

Case 2:21-cv-01208-DJC-CKD Document 48 Filed 02/07/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Within 7 days after the parties’ Rule 26 discussion, the parties shall file a joint status 

report and request for hearing before the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of entry of a pretrial 

scheduling order. The report shall address the following matters:

a. Service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and their scheduling;

f. The report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 outlining the 

proposed discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut−off dates for discovery 

and law and motion, and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;

h. Special procedures, if any;

i. Estimated trial time;

j. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the

simplicity or complexity of the proceedings;

k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including bankruptcy;

l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled before another Magistrate 

Judge;

m. The parties’ positions with respect to Voluntary Dispute Resolution (VDRP) 

under Local Rule 271(d); and

n. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this 

matter.

Dated: February 6, 2023

8.Ferreira21cv1208.isc

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:21-cv-01208-DJC-CKD Document 48 Filed 02/07/23 Page 2 of 2