Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-00774/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-00774-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)

---

LA 9382442v1

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION

Case No. 11-cv-774-PSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

PRINTED ON

RECYCLED PAPER

JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP

STANLEY M. GIBSON (Bar No. 162329), sgibson@jmbm.com

GREGORY S. CORDREY (Bar No. 190144), gcordrey@jmbm.com

ANDREW I. SHADOFF (Bar No. 272319), ashadoff@jmbm.com

1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Telephone: (310) 203-8080

Facsimile: (310) 203-0567

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC.

ACCESSORIES MARKETING, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL,

INC., and ACCESSORIES MARKETING,

INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TEK GLOBAL S.R.L. and TEK

CORPORATION,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 11-cv-774-PSG (Lead case)

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE JOINT

STIPULATION TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE

OR TESTIMONY RELATING TO TEK'S

CONSTRUCTIONS OF CLAIM

LANGUAGE THAT CONFLICT WITH THE

COURT'S CONSTRUCTIONS

[Joint Stipulation filed concurrently herewith]

Final Pretrial

Conference Date: April 2, 2013

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Courtroom: 5, 4th Floor

Judge: Hon. Paul S. Grewal

(Consolidated with Case No. 11-cv-1649)

Case 3:11-cv-00774-VC Document 169 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 2
LA 9382442v1

- 2 -

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION

Case No. 11-cv-774-PSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

PRINTED ON

RECYCLED PAPER

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the Joint Stipulation to Preclude Evidence or Testimony

Relating to TEK's Construction of Claim Language That Conflicts with the Court's Construction

filed by Plaintiff Accessories Marketing, Inc. ("AMI"), and Defendant TEK Corporation ("TEK"),

and good cause appearing therefor, hereby ORDERS that:

1. TEK may not introduce evidence or testimony, including the testimony of Dr.

Homayoon Kazerooni, relating to or based on claim constructions that differ from the Court's claim

constructions.

2. TEK may not introduce evidence or testimony relating to or based on the

construction of the terms "opposite substantially the same opening" or "opening substantially

opposes" as those terms appear in AMI's U.S. Patent No. 6,789,581, that are different from the

Court's construction of these claim terms.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________, 2013 ______________________________

Hon. Paul Singh Grewal

United States District Court

March 29

Case 3:11-cv-00774-VC Document 169 Filed 03/29/13 Page 2 of 2