Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00080/USCOURTS-caed-1_18-cv-00080-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EARNEST S. HARRIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SEXTON, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.

§1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants’ use of the Guard One security check system violated his 

Eighth Amendment rights. On July 5, 2023, this court ordered plaintiff to file a renewed motion 

to amend his second amended complaint within thirty days. Thirty days have passed and plaintiff 

has not filed a renewed motion or otherwise responded to the court’s July 5 order. Since plaintiff 

has failed to comply with the court’s order despite ample opportunity to do so, this court will not 

further delay these proceedings. The case will proceed on plaintiff’s second amended complaint 

filed February 2, 2019 (ECF No. 42), as supplemented with plaintiff’s Eighth and First 

Amendment claims against defendant Flores (see Jan. 17, 2023 Order (ECF No. 100)). 

////

////

////

Case 1:18-cv-00080-DC-SCR Document 108 Filed 09/08/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

It does not appear that defendant Flores has filed a response to the second amended 

complaint, as supplemented. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within 30 days of the 

date of this order, defendant Flores shall file a response to the second amended complaint. 

Dated: September 8, 2023

DLB:9

DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/harr0080.flores ans

Case 1:18-cv-00080-DC-SCR Document 108 Filed 09/08/23 Page 2 of 2