Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00823/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00823-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Larry D. Alexander,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-0823 DFL PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

Stockton Police Dept., et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner without counsel prosecuting a

civil rights action. He claims defendants violated his

constitutional rights by wrongfully convicting him and seeks

damages. He has not invalidated his conviction by habeas corpus

or other means.

March 16, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause

why this action is not barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477

(1994). Plaintiff did not respond. 

Plaintiff cannot proceed under the civil rights statute for

Case 2:04-cv-00823-DFL-PAN Document 5 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

reasons explained in the March 16, 2005, order.

Accordingly, the court hereby recommends this action be

dismissed.

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: May 31, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00823-DFL-PAN Document 5 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 2