Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01417/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01417-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN DOE, JOHN ROE, JOHN ZOE,

JANE AOE, JOHN BOE, JOHN COE,

JANE EOE, JOHN DOE II, JANE ROE,

JANE AOE II, JOHN BOE II, JANE

BOE, JANE COE, and JANE EOE II on

behalf of themselves and all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

D.M. CAMP & SONS; MARKO

ZANINOVICH, INC.; SUNVIEW

VINEYARDS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.;

GIUMARRA VINEYARDS

CORPORATION; EL RANCHO FARMS;

STEVCO, INC.; FAL INC. (dba Lucich

Farms); CASTLEROCK FARMING AND

TRANSPORT, INC.;

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIV-F-04-1417 AWI SMS

STIPULATION TO ALLOW

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANT D.M. CAMP & SONS

MOTION TO DISMISS TO BE

SERVED AND FILED ON SAME

DATE AS OPPOSITION TO OTHER

MOTIONS TO DISMISS; ORDER 

STIPULATION

WHEREAS the Court entered an order March 9, 2006 approving the parties’ stipulation

that motions to dismiss would be due 30 days after the filing and service of the Second Amended

Complaint, that Plaintiffs’ opposition would be due within 30 days after service of the motions,

and that defendants’ replies would be due 20 days thereafter;

WHEREAS Defendant D. M. Camp & Sons filed its motion to dismiss on April 7, three

Case 1:05-cv-01417-AWI -SMS Document 88 Filed 05/07/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

days before the deadline, while all other defendants filed their motions to dismiss on Monday

April 10;

WHEREAS Plaintiffs desire to file oppositions to all motions on the same date, and for

replies to be due on the same date, and D.M. Camp & Sons agrees;

THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AND THE COURT IS

REQUESTED TO ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 

1. Plaintiffs may file and serve their opposition to the motion to dismiss of D.M.

Camp & Sons on the same date on which the oppositions to other defendants’

motions to dismiss are due, that is, on May 10, 2006. 

Dated: May 2, 2006.

LAW OFFICES OF MALLISON & MARTINEZ

By: /s/ Stan S. Mallison

Stan S. Mallison

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: May 2, 2006.

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Christian L. Raisner

Christian L. Raisner

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: May 2, 2006.

MILBERG, WEISS, BERSHAD & SCHULMAN

By: /s/ Jeff Westerman

Jeff Westerman

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: May 2, 2006.

BARSAMIAN, SAQUI & MOODY

By: /s/ Ronald H. Barsamian

Ronald H. Barsamian

Attorneys for Defendant D.M. Camp & Sons

Case 1:05-cv-01417-AWI -SMS Document 88 Filed 05/07/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

ORDER ON STIPULATION

Having read and considered the foregoing Stipulation of the parties, and good cause

appearing, the foregoing paragraph number 1 is hereby approved. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 7, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01417-AWI -SMS Document 88 Filed 05/07/06 Page 3 of 3