Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-04975/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-04975-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

AMENDED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. CIV C 04-4975 SBA 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kenneth E. Keller (State Bar No. 71450)

Kathy M. Sarria (State Bar No. 181322)

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP

114 Sansome Street, 4th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 249-8330

Facsimile: (415) 249-8333

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

G&G Specialty Foods, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(Oakland Division)

G&G SPECIALTY FOODS, INC., a California 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PACK LINE CORP., a foreign profit 

corporation,

Defendant.

Case No.: CASE NO.: C 04-4975 SBA 

AMENDED STIPULATED DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

PACK LINE CORP, a foreign profit 

corporation,

Counterclaimant,

vs.

G&G SPECIALTY FOODS, INC., a California 

corporation,

Counterdefendant.

Case 4:04-cv-04975-SBA Document 30 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 3
AMENDED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. CIV C 04-4975 SBA 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff/Counterdefendant G&G Specialty 

Foods, Inc. (“G&G”) and Defendant/Counterclaimant Pack Line Corp. (“Pack Line”), through their 

designated counsel, that all remaining claims and counterclaims asserted in this action are dismissed with 

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1) and (c) based upon the settlement 

of the parties hereto. All parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees pursuant to their separately 

executed Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release.

The parties consent to and request that Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen retain continuing 

exclusive jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter hereto for the purpose of interpreting and

enforcing the August 29, 2005 Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release.

STIPULATED AND AGREED:

Dated: October 31, 2005 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP

By _______________________/s/_______________

Kenneth E. Keller

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

G&G Specialty Foods, Inc..

Dated: October 31, 2005 HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKIN

By ______________________/s/_________________

Jeffrey E. Faucette

Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants

Pack Line Corp.

Case 4:04-cv-04975-SBA Document 30 Filed 11/01/05 Page 2 of 3
AMENDED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. CIV C 04-4975 SBA 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of 

this case, including all claims and counterclaims, and having entered into a Stipulation of Dismissal,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, upon the consent of the parties hereto, that:

1. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of and the parties hereto and venue is 

properly laid in this district.

2. By the parties’ consent and request, Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen shall retain 

continuing exclusive jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter hereto for the purpose of 

interpreting and enforcing the August 29, 2005 Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release.

4. All remaining claims and counterclaims asserted in this action are dismissed with 

prejudice.

5. Each of the parties hereto shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in this 

action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 11/1/05

The Hon. Judge Saundra B. Armstrong

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-04975-SBA Document 30 Filed 11/01/05 Page 3 of 3