Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02085/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02085-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Steven J. Nataupsky (SBN. 155,913)

steven.nataupsky@knobbe.com

Michael K. Friedland (SBN 157,217)

michael.friedland@knobbe.com

Ali S. Razai (SBN 246,922)

ali.razai@knobbe.com

Jenna C. Kelleher (SBN 294,034)

jenna.kelleher@knobbe.com

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, 

LLP

2040 Main Street

Fourteenth Floor

Irvine, CA 92614

Phone: (949)760-0404

Facsimile: (949)760-9502

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

CESCA THERAPEUTICS INC.

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

STUART L. GASNER - # 164675

sgasner@kvn.com

ERIC H. MACMICHAEL - #231697

emacmichael@kvn.com

MATAN SHACHAM - # 262348

mshacham@kvn.com

633 Battery Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-1809

Telephone: 415 391 5400

Facsimile: 415 397 7188

GORDON & REES LLP

ROBERT P. ANDRIS - # 130290

randris@gordonrees.com

MICHAEL D. KANACH - # 271215

mkanach@gordonrees.com

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415 986 5900

Facsimile: 415 986 8054

Attorneys for Defendants

SYNGEN, INC., PHC MEDICAL, INC. and 

PHILIP COELHO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRMENTO DIVISION

CESCA THERAPEUTICS INC., 

Plaintiff,

v.

SYNGEN INC., a California Corporation, PHC 

MEDICAL INC., a California Corporation, 

PHILIP COELHO, an individual, and DOES 1-

10, INCLUSIVE,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:14-cv-02085-TLN/KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY 

BRIEF

Case 2:14-cv-02085-TLN-KJN Document 77 Filed 06/09/16 Page 1 of 2
-1- Joint Stip.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendants’ will be filing on June 9, 2016 a reply brief in support of their Motion to 

Stay. The Court’s standing order provides that reply briefs shall not exceed 10 pages, and 

that a party wishing to file a lengthier document may seek an extension of that page limitation 

from the Court. Defendants respectfully request a 5-page extension for their reply brief. 

Defendants believe that these additional 5 pages are necessary to fully address the issues and 

will assist the Court in deciding this motion. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendants’ request 

and has agreed to stipulate to the 5-page extension for this reply brief. Thus, with the Court’s 

permission, Defendants will file a reply in support of their Motion to Stay that shall not 

exceed 15 pages.

Dated: June 9, 2016 By: s/ Eric MacMichael

Stuart L. Gasner

Eric H. Macmichael

Matan Shacham 

GORDON & REES LLP

Robert P. Andris 

Michael D. Kanach

Attorneys for Defendants

Syngen, Inc., PHC Medical, Inc. and 

Philip Coelho

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

Dated: June 9, 2016 By: s/ Ali S. Razai (with permission)

Steven J. Nataupsky

Michael K. Friedland

Ali S. Razai

Jenna C. Kelleher

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Cesca Therapeutics Inc. 

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2016

Case 2:14-cv-02085-TLN-KJN Document 77 Filed 06/09/16 Page 2 of 2