Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02755/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02755-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Plaintiff also filed, on March 17, 2008, a document styled “Motion for Reconsideration

of Magistrate Judge’s Order and Findings & Recommendations of February 29, 2008,” which the

court construes as objections to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS EUGENE MOORE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2755 FCD EFB P

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 29, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. On March 17 and

April 24, 2008, plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1

////

Case 2:06-cv-02755-FCD-EFB Document 23 Filed 08/12/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 29, 2008, are adopted in

full; 

2. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is dismissed, without further leave to

amend, for failure to state a claim; and

3. The Clerk is directed to close the case.

DATED: August 11, 2008.

Case 2:06-cv-02755-FCD-EFB Document 23 Filed 08/12/08 Page 2 of 2