Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-04537/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-04537-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GUADALUPE SOLORIO,

Plaintiff,

v.

YILDA MEDINA ALVARADO d/b/a

CLEAN TIL IT SQUEAKS AND

PAINTING,

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 09-4537 PVT

ORDER CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

On March 16, 2010, Plaintiff’s counsel appeared before Magistrate Judge Patricia V.

Trumbull for a Further Case Management Conference. Defense counsel failed to appear. The court

continued the Case Management Conference to March 30, 2010. On March 19, 2010, the parties

filed, and the court issued a stipulation and order selecting mediation, with the mediation to be held

within 90 days of that order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference is CONTINUED to June

29, 2010. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement no later than June

22, 2010. Failure to timely file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement (or a separate

statement if opposing counsel fails to participate in preparation of a statement) may well result in

sanctions and possibly an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed (or default

Case 5:09-cv-04537-PSG Document 19 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties have failed to file any Case Management Conference Statement in this matter, 1

despite the fact the Case Management Conference has been held twice. The court notes that counsel for

Plaintiff often files Case Management Conference Statements after the scheduled deadlines. Counsel

for Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to timely file Case Management Conference Statements in the

future, in this or any other case, may well result in order to show cause why the particular case should

not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

ORDER, page 2

entered if it is the Defendant who fails to file a statement) for failure to prosecute (or defend) the

action.1

Dated: 3/30/10

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:09-cv-04537-PSG Document 19 Filed 03/30/10 Page 2 of 2