Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-1_14-cv-00071/USCOURTS-ared-1_14-cv-00071-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

ANTHONY HENRY PLAINTIFF 

ADC #140754 

v. No.1:14-cv-71-DPM-BD 

KANE SPICER, Corporal, Grimes Unit DEFENDANT 

ORDER 

Unopposed recommendation, NQ 23, adopted with corrections* as 

modified. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Notes). 

Henry's claim is one of disparate treatment, not disparate impact. 

Nonetheless, Henry has not identified affirmative evidence from which a jury 

could find discriminatory motive. Lewis v. Jacks, 486 F.3d 1025, 1028 (8th Cir. 

2007). Motion for summary judgment, NQ 19, granted. Henry's equal 

protection claim will be dismissed with prejudice. 

*The Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., citation on page 2 should be to 

pages 247-48 of the opinion. In the second paragraph under the "Equal 

Protection Claim" heading, the two citations to" (#4, p. 22)" should be to 

NQ 20-3 at 5-6. And the Weiler v. Purkett quote on page 3 should read: "The 

heart of an equal protection claim is that similarly situated classes of 

inmates are treated differently, and that this difference in treatment bears 

no rational relation to any legitimate penal interest." 

Case 1:14-cv-00071-DPM Document 24 Filed 08/10/15 Page 1 of 2
So Ordered. 

D.P. Marshall Jr. 

United States District Judge 

a 

-2-

Case 1:14-cv-00071-DPM Document 24 Filed 08/10/15 Page 2 of 2