Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00392/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00392-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

Heller 

Ehrman LLP

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS, Case No.: 3:07-CV-0392 SC 

Michael L. Charlson (SBN 122125) 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

275 Middlefield Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-3506 

Phone: +1.650.324.7000 

Facsimile: +1.650.324.0638 

E-Mail: Michael.Charlson@hellerehrman.com 

Carol Lynn Thompson (SBN 148079) 

Nathaniel Spencer-Mork (SBN 226886) 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

333 Bush Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104-2878 

Telephone: +1.415.772.6000 

Facsimile: +1.415.772.6268 

E-Mail: CarolLynn.Thompson@hellerehrman.com 

E-Mail: Nate.SpencerMork@hellerehrman.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

[Appearance Of Additional Counsel 

Noted On Signature Page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROSENBAUM CAPITAL, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JOHN E. MCNULTY, TIM STEINKOPF AND 

SECURE COMPUTING CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

Case No.: 3:07-CV-0392 SC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

The Honorable Samuel Conti 

Case 3:07-cv-00392-SC Document 5 Filed 02/14/07 Page 1 of 4
Heller 

Ehrman LLP

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS, Case No.: 3:07-CV-0392 SC 

The parties to the above-entitled action, by and through their counsel of record, 

hereby stipulate as follows: 

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, the complaint in this action was filed on January 19, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Defendant Secure Computing Corporation (“Secure Computing”) was 

served with the complaint and summons in this action on January 22, 2007, and pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, Secure Computing’s deadline to file a response to the 

complaint is February 14, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Rosenbaum Capital, LLC (“Plaintiff”) published notice of the 

pendancy of this purported class action, pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform 

Act (“PSLRA”), 15 U.S.C. §7 8u-4(a)(3)(A) on January 19, 2007, and according to the 

notice, the deadline for members of the purported class to file motions to be designated lead 

plaintiff is March 20, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff plans to file an Amended Complaint in this action; 

WHEREAS, there have been no previous extensions of time in this action; 

* * * 

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated that, subject to the Court’s approval, the 

following schedule shall apply to Defendants’ responses to the Complaint and Amended 

Complaint in this case: 

(1) Defendants shall not be required to respond to the Complaint in this action. 

(2) Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint in this action no later than 45 days 

following issuance of an order by the Court appointing a lead plaintiff and lead counsel 

pursuant to the PSLRA, 15 U.S.C. §7 8u-4(a)(3)(B). 

(3) Defendants shall file and serve any response to the Amended Complaint, 

including without limitation Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12(b), no later than 45 days following service of Amended Complaint. 

(4) Plaintiff shall file and serve Oppositions to any Motions to Dismiss the Amended 

Complaint 45 days following filing of any Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. 

Case 3:07-cv-00392-SC Document 5 Filed 02/14/07 Page 2 of 4
Heller 

Ehrman LLP

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS, Case No.: 3:07-CV-0392 SC 

(5) Defendants shall file and serve any Reply in Support of any Motion to Dismiss 

30 days following filing of Opposition(s) to any Motion to Dismiss. 

SO STIPULATED. 

February 13, 2007 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

By /s/ Michael L. Charlson 

 MICHAEL L. CHARLSON 

Attorneys for Defendants 

February 13, 2007 GREEN WELLING LLP 

By /s/ William B. Federman 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Robert S. Green 

Elizabeth C. Guarnieri 

595 Market Street, Suite 2750 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone; (415) 477-6700 

Facsimile: (415) 477-6710 

Email: cand.uscourts@classcounsel.com 

William B. Federman 

FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 

10205 N. Pennsylvania 

Oklahoma City, OK 73120 

Telephone: (405) 235-1560 

Facsimile: (405) 239-2112 

Mark Henzel 

LAW OFFICES OF MARK HENZEL 

273 Montgomery Ave., Suite 202 

Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 

Telephone: (610) 660-8000 

Facsimile: (610) 660-8080 

Case 3:07-cv-00392-SC Document 5 Filed 02/14/07 Page 3 of 4
Heller 

Ehrman LLP

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS, Case No.: 3:07-CV-0392 SC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered the stipulation of counsel and good cause appearing therefore, IT 

IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

(1) Defendants shall not be required to respond to the Complaint in this action. 

(2) Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint in this action no later than 45 days 

following issuance of an order by the Court appointing a lead plaintiff and lead counsel 

pursuant to the PSLRA, 15 U.S.C. §7 8u-4(a)(3)(B). 

(3) Defendants shall file and serve any response to the Amended Complaint, 

including without limitation Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12(b), no later than 45 days following service of Amended Complaint. 

(4) Plaintiff shall file and serve Oppositions to any Motions to Dismiss the Amended 

Complaint 45 days following filing of any Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. 

(5) Defendants shall file and serve any Reply in Support of any Motion to Dismiss 

30 days following filing of Opposition(s) to any Motion to Dismiss. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _________________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

2/14/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-00392-SC Document 5 Filed 02/14/07 Page 4 of 4