Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01195/USCOURTS-ca4-09-01195-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1195

DEBORAH A. MULLINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY; CHARLES KRYSIAK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:07-cv-02454-CCB)

Submitted: February 11, 2010 Decided: March 3, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John B. Stolarz, THE STOLARZ LAW FIRM, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellant. George A. Nilson, City Solicitor, Gary Gilkey, Chief 

Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-1195 Doc: 36 Filed: 03/03/2010 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Deborah Mullins appeals the district court’s orders

denying her motion for leave to amend the complaint and granting 

the Appellees’ motion for summary judgment on Mullins’ claims of 

gender discrimination, First Amendment retaliation, and tortious 

interference with contract and economic relations. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Mullins v. Mayor and City of Baltimore, No. 1:07-cv-02454-CCB 

(D. Md. Jan. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-1195 Doc: 36 Filed: 03/03/2010 Pg: 2 of 2