Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-02398/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-02398-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RICHARD J. IDELL (SBN 069033) 

ORY SANDEL (SBN 233204) 

ELIZABETH J. REST (244756) 

IDELL AND SEITEL LLP 

465 California Street, Suite 300 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 986-2400 

Facsimile: (415) 392-9259 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant 

BRUNI GLASS PACKAING, INC. and for 

Counter-Defendant BRUNI GLASS, S.p.A. 

KEVIN NORRIS (SBN 206022) 

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS O’HAGAN 

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2070 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 587-1600 

Facsimile: (510) 587-0056 

Attorneys for Counter-Defendant 

BRUNI GLASS PACKAGING, INC.

PHILIP J. TERRY (SBN 148144) 

ANGELA G. DENNIS (SBN 232598) 

CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP 

100 B Street, Suite 400 

Santa Rosa, California 95401 

Telephone: (707) 526-4200 

Facsimile: (707) 526-4707 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counter Claimant 

COPAIN WINE CELLARS, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BRUNI GLASS PACKAGING, INC., a 

Florida corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

COPAIN WINE CELLARS, LLC, a California 

limited liability company, and DOES 1 - 100, 

inclusive, 

 Defendant(s). 

Case No. CV 09-2398 

STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL [FRCP 

41(a); 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM

Plaintiff and Counter-defendant BRUNI GLASS PACKAGING, ING., a Florida 

corporation (“Plaintiff” or “Bruni”), and Counter-defendant BRUNI GLASS, S.p.A. (“Bruni 

Italy”), on the one hand, and Counterclaimant and Defendant COPAIN WINE CELLARS, LLC, a 

Case 4:09-cv-02398-CW Document 39 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 5
 STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

California limited liability company (“Copain”), on the other hand, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Bruni filed the complaint in this action on May 29, 2009; and 

WHEREAS, Copain filed an answer to the complaint on July 6, 2009; and 

WHEREAS, Copain filed a counterclaim on July 6, 2009; and 

WHEREAS Bruni answered the counterclaim on October 6, 2009; and 

WHEREAS, on March 12, 2010, the parties engaged in mediation and, without any 

admission of liability on the part of any party, reached a settlement of the entire action, including 

the claims of both the complaint and the counterclaim; and 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to dismiss all claims being made in this action with 

prejudice; and 

WHEREAS, the parties have, except as otherwise provided in their settlement agreement, 

agreed mutually to waive any attorney’s fees and costs incurred to date in defense and/or 

prosecution of the above matter; 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 

1.0 The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated by this reference. 

2.0 This Stipulation is entered into pursuant to Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of 

Evidence and shall not be admissible for any purpose. 

3.0 In consideration of this Stipulation, except as otherwise provided in their 

settlement agreement, the parties agree to a full and complete mutual waiver of any claim for any 

attorney’s fees or costs incurred to date in prosecution and defense of this action as against each 

other. 

4.0 Plaintiff shall file this Stipulation with the Court for an order thereon, dismissing 

this action with prejudice, each Party to bear its own costs and expenses. 

 CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP 

Dated: March 15, 2010 By: /s/ 

 Philip J. Terry 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counter Claimant 

COPAIN WINE CELLARS, LLC 

IDELL & SEITEL LLP 

Dated: March 15, 2010 By: /s/ 

Richard J. Idell 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter Defendant 

Case 4:09-cv-02398-CW Document 39 Filed 06/09/10 Page 2 of 5
 STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BRUNI GLASS PACKAGING INC., and for 

Counter Defendant BRUNI GLASS S.p.A. 

 

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS O’HAGAN

Dated: March 15, 2010 By: /s/ 

Kevin Norris 

Attorneys for Counter-Defendant BRUNI 

GLASS PACKAGING INC. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

the complaint and counterclaim on file in this action are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

The action in its entirety is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and expenses 

incurred to date in defense and/or prosecution of the above matter, except as otherwise provided in 

their settlement agreement. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 Judge of the United States District Court 

6/9/2010

Case 4:09-cv-02398-CW Document 39 Filed 06/09/10 Page 3 of 5
Case 4:09-cv-02398-CW Document 39 Filed 06/09/10 Page 4 of 5
Case 4:09-cv-02398-CW Document 39 Filed 06/09/10 Page 5 of 5