Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01552/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01552-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

SAVOIE, et al.,

 Defendants.

No. 1:21-cv-01552-NONE-GSA-PC

 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING 

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA 

PAUPERIS AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO 

PAY $402.00 FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN 

THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. Nos. 2 and 5)

Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On October 25, 2021, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 

plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and 

plaintiff be required to submit the $402.00 filing fee in full within thirty days. (Doc. No. 5.) 

On November 10, 2021, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. 

No. 11.) 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

including plaintiff’s objections, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

Case 1:21-cv-01552-KES-GSA Document 12 Filed 11/22/21 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

supported by the record and proper analysis. Plaintiff’s objections do not undermine the wellreasoned conclusion of the findings and recommendations that plaintiff has failed to satisfy the 

imminent danger exception to the three strikes rule set forth at 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Accordingly, 

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on October 

25, 2021 (Doc. No. 5), are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, filed on October 21, 2021

(Doc. No. 2.), is denied;

3. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff is required to pay 

the $402.00 filing fee in full for this action; and

4. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this 

action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 20, 2021 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:21-cv-01552-KES-GSA Document 12 Filed 11/22/21 Page 2 of 2