Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01677/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01677-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LATWAHN MCELROY,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01677-OWW-SKO PC

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE,

WITHIN 30 DAYS, OPPOSITION OR

STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff Latwahn McElroy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 15, 2009, Defendant

Cope filed a motion to dismiss based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. 

(Doc. #29.) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion to

dismiss. By Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or statement of nonopposition within 21 days of the date of service of Defendant’s motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this Order, Plaintiff shall

file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff’s

failure to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition in compliance with this order may

result in this action being dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 21, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

Case 1:07-cv-01677-OWW -SKO Document 36 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 1