Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00790/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00790-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LANDIS MAEZ,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHEVRON TEXACO CORP.; CHEVRON

U.S.A., INC., and CHEVRON ENERGY

SOLUTIONS, L.P.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 04-00790 JSW

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’

FOURTH MOTION IN LIMINE

AND DEFENDANTS’

OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S

EXHIBITS 

Now before the Court is Defendant’s fourth motion in limine and Defendants’ objections

to certain of Plaintiff’s exhibits. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ papers, considered their

arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby rules as

follows. Based on Plaintiff’s stipulation that he is not pursuing wage claims relating to the

Hopland, Kraft, Albertsons, and Sun Pacific projects, the Court HEREBY GRANTS

Defendants’ motion with respect to these projects. The Court DENIES Defendants’ motion

with respect to the Sunkist project.

The Court FURTHER ORDERS that Defendants’ objections to Plaintiff’s Exhibits Nos.

23, 24, 25, and 26 are OVERRULED. Defendants’ objections to Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 38 are

SUSTAINED. The Court need not rule on Defendants’ objections to Plaintiff’s Exhibits Nos.

67 and 68 because Plaintiff has withdrawn these exhibits and will not offer them into evidence.

The parties are HEREBY ORDERED to provide two complete sets for Chambers of the

exhibits they intend to introduce at trial by no later than 8:15 a.m. on Tuesday, October 11,

Case 3:04-cv-00790-JSW Document 154 Filed 10/06/05 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2005. The exhibits shall be presented in binders, and all exhibits that have been withdrawn or to

which objections have been sustained shall be omitted from these binders. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 6, 2005 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-00790-JSW Document 154 Filed 10/06/05 Page 2 of 2