Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00754/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00754-38/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAMONT SHEPARD,

Plaintiff,

v.

G. MIRANDA,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:10-cv-00754-LJO-BAM (PC)

ORDER ADVANCING JURY TRIAL AND 

RELATED DEADLINES

Jury trial: December 1, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. in 

Courtroom 4 (LJO)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO EMAIL 

COPY OF ORDER TO LITIGATION 

COORDINATOR

Plaintiff Lamont Shepard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter proceeds to trial on 

Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant G. Miranda for excessive force in violation of the Eighth 

Amendment. A jury trial is scheduled for December 17, 2015.

It is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Due to the press of court business, jury trial is ADVANCED to December 1, 2015 

at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 (LJO); 

2. Plaintiff may bring any written motion(s) in limine, and any written opposition to 

Defendant’s motion(s) in limine, with him to be addressed in person at a hearing before the start 

of the jury trial. Plaintiff should bring one original and one copy of any motion(s) in limine and 

any opposition to Defendant’s motion(s) in limine so that he can serve Defendant with a copy of 

his filing(s) at the time he presents it to the Court; 

Case 1:10-cv-00754-LJO-BAM Document 157 Filed 11/19/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Although he is not required to submit them, Plaintiff may bring with him any trial 

brief, proposed verdict form, proposed jury instructions, proposed voir dire, or a statement of the 

case with him to trial to be addressed by the Court. If he chooses to submit any of these, he should 

bring one original and one copy of any such filing(s) with him so that he can serve Defendant 

with a copy; 

4. All other provisions of the Court’s Pretrial Order dated October 28, 2015 remain in

full force and effect; 

5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Kern Valley 

State Prison (“KSVP”) Litigation Coordinator via email; and 

6. The KSVP Litigation Coordinator is respectfully requested to deliver the emailed

copy of this order to Plaintiff as soon as practicable.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 19, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00754-LJO-BAM Document 157 Filed 11/19/15 Page 2 of 2