Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-02302/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-02302-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

HOPKINS & CARLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN JOSE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

703961.1 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORD TO: (1) ENLARGE TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT; AND (2) CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CV10-02302-PVT

William S. Klein, Bar No. 121792 

wklein@hopkinscarley.com 

Dori L. Yob, Bar No. 227364 

dyob@hopkinscarley.com 

HOPKINS & CARLEY 

A Law Corporation 

The Letitia Building 

70 S First Street 

San Jose, CA 95113-2406 

mailing address:

P.O. Box 1469 

San Jose, CA 95109-1469 

Telephone: (408) 286-9800 

Facsimile: (408) 998-4790 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S. INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

KAIAM CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S. INC., a 

Delaware Corporation, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. CV10-02302-PVT 

AMENDED STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO: (1) ENLARGE 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER 

OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; AND (2) 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, Defendant Avago Technologies U.S., Inc. (“Avago”) 

and Plaintiff Kaiam Corporation (“Kaiam”), by and through their respective counsel of record, 

hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Kaiam served its Complaint for Breach of Contract and Unfair Competition 

on May 26, 2010; 

WHEREAS, Avago currently has until Tuesday, August 3, 2010 to answer or respond to 

Kaiam’s Complaint; 

WHEREAS, notice is hereby given that the parties reached an agreement to settle this 

XXXXXXXXXXX

Case 5:10-cv-02302-PVT Document 11 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 3
HOPKINS & CARLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN JOSE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

703961.1 - 2 - 

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORD TO: (1) ENLARGE TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT; AND (2) CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CV10-02302-PVT 

matter, such that the parties contemplate dismissal with prejudice of this action (subject to the 

terms of a final settlement agreement) within sixty (60) days; 

WHEREAS, Kaiam has consented to an extension of time for Avago to answer or 

otherwise respond to Kaiam’s Complaint to allow time for the parties to execute a final settlement 

agreement and file a dismissal of the action with prejudice; 

WHEREAS, to conserve the resources of the parties and the Court, Kaiam and Avago 

have agreed to continue the Initial Case Management Conference from Tuesday, August 31, 2010 

to Tuesday, October 26, 2010, or the Court’s first-available date thereafter; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, 

through their respective counsel, that: (1) the deadline for Avago to answer or otherwise respond 

to Kaiam’s complaint shall be extended from Tuesday, August 3, 2010 up to and through 

Tuesday, October 12, 2010 and; (2) pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 and 16-2(e) and subject to 

the approval of this Court, the Initial Case Management Conference shall be continued from 

Tuesday, August 31, 2010 to Tuesday, October 26, 2010, or the Court’s first-available date 

thereafter. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: August 3, 2010 HOPKINS & CARLEY 

A Law Corporation 

By: /s/ Dori L. Yob 

Dori L. Yob, Attorneys for Defendants 

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S. INC., a 

Delaware Corporation 

Dated: August 3, 2010 KLEIN, O’NEILL & SINGH, LLP 

By: /s/ Sang N. Dang 

Sang N. Dang, Attorneys for Plaintiff 

KAIAM COPORATION, a Delaware 

Corporation 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________ __________________________________ 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

August 4, 2010

XXXXXX 

MAGISTRATE

XXXXX 

JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-02302-PVT Document 11 Filed 08/04/10 Page 2 of 3
HOPKINS & CARLEY

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN JOSE

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

703961.1 - 3 - 

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORD TO: (1) ENLARGE TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT; AND (2) CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CV10-02302-PVT 

ATTESTATION OF DORI L. YOB

I, Dori L. Yob, am one of the attorneys of record for Defendant, Avago Technologies 

U.S., Inc. I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from Sang N. Dang attorney 

of record for Plaintiff Kaiam Corporation, which shall serve in lieu of his signature on the filed 

document. I have obtained and will maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent 

production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party until one year after 

final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 

Case 5:10-cv-02302-PVT Document 11 Filed 08/04/10 Page 3 of 3