Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03808/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03808-33/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAREN MOE HUMPHREYS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA ET AL,

Defendants. /

No. C-04-03808 SI (EDL)

ORDER

The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s administrative motion for leave to:

1. File a five-page supplement to her Reply ISO Motion to Compel Production of

Documents on Privilege Log (“Motion to Compel”). This supplemental pleading will be filed by

August 15, 2006, and will be strictly limited to addressing the 35 items in Defendants’ August 9,

2006, “Addendum to Revised Privilege Log,” and, if added by August 14 at 10:00 a.m., the one

additional item referred to below. Defendants wrote Plaintiff on August 9, 2006 that in addition to

the addendum to the privilege log provided on that late date, Defendants were “still in the process of

determining whether a single document (which we have neither produced nor put on the privileged

log) is subject to the attorney-client privilege.” Lee Decl., Ex. A For the time being, the Court will

defer consideration of whether the additions to the privilege log are too late, but Defendants are

cautioned that if they wish to argue that the additional single document that they have not yet logged

is privileged, they must provide an addendum to the log to Plaintiff no later than August 14, 2006 at

10 a.m. Defendants may not claim privilege for any additional items on the archive CD referred to

in the August 9, 2006 letter, due to waiver by untimeliness.

 

Case 3:04-cv-03808-SI Document 466 Filed 08/11/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Defendants may file a response to the supplemental pleading no later than August 18,

2006.

3. The August 22, 2006 hearing is vacated. The Court will notify the parties if it decides

that a hearing is necessary at a later date, otherwise it will decide the motion on the papers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 11, 2006 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03808-SI Document 466 Filed 08/11/06 Page 2 of 2