Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO SUBMIT PORTION OF AMD MEDIATION 

STATEMENT TO JAPANESE COURT AND STIPULATED ORDER TO REMOVE ITEM FROM PUBLIC 

DOCKET 

CV 04-03171 (CRB) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL J. BERGESON, State Bar No. 105439 

MELINDA M. MORTON, State Bar No. 209373 

BERGESON, LLP 

303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500 

San Jose, CA 95110-2712 

Telephone: (408) 291-6200 

Facsimile: (408) 297-6000 

MARK C. HANSEN, pro hac vice 

J.C. ROZENDAAL, pro hac vice

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD & EVANS, PLLC 

Sumner Square 

1615 M Street, NW, Suite 400 

Washington, DC 20036

Telephone: (202) 326-7900 

Facsimile: (202) 326-7999 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

OKI AMERICA, INC., OKI ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRY CO., LTD., OKI DATA 

CORPORATION, OKI DATA AMERICAS, 

INC., and OKI TELECOM, INC., 

Plaintiffs,

 vs. 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

Defendant.

 Civil Action No. C04-03171-CRB 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO SUBMIT 

PORTION OF AMD MEDIATION 

STATEMENT TO JAPANESE COURT 

AND STIPULATED ORDER TO REMOVE

ITEM FROM PUBLIC DOCKET 

Date: _January 27, 2006 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Dept.: Courtroom 8 

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

Complaint Filed: August 3, 2004 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 149 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 3
- 2 -

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO SUBMIT PORTION OF AMD MEDIATION 

STATEMENT TO JAPANESE COURT AND STIPULATED ORDER TO REMOVE ITEM FROM PUBLIC 

DOCKET 

CV 04-03171 (CRB) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-7(e), Oki hereby withdraws, 

for the reasons explained below, the following motion: Oki’s Notice of Motion and Motion For 

Permission to Disclose Portion of AMD Mediation Statement to Japanese Court (Document 130, 

filed Dec. 21, 2005).

AMD has informed Oki that AMD believes that the withdrawn motion contains 

information that AMD deems confidential and that the motion should therefore not have been filed 

in the public docket. At AMD’s request, a Renewed Motion (substantially identical to the motion 

being withdrawn) was submitted to the Court under seal on December 23, 2005, pursuant Local 

Rule 79-5, in order to give AMD an opportunity to identify to the Court what it believes to be 

confidential information and to seek that the document be filed under seal rather than in the public 

docket. (Oki has requested that the Renewed Motion also be made available in the public docket, 

but submitted the Renewed Motion under seal in order to prevent disclosure of its contents until 

this Court has made a determination regarding whether the documents should be filed publicly or 

should instead be filed under seal. See Motion for Determination Whether Documents Should Be 

Filed Under Seal (Document 139, filed Dec. 23, 2005)) It is Oki’s intention that the Renewed 

Motion, which has been noticed for January 27, take the place of the motion being withdrawn 

hereby.

Consistent with the course of action described above, in order to prevent the public 

disclosure of materials that might be deemed confidential, the parties further stipulate and agree, 

pursuant to Local Rules 7-11(a) and 7-12, that the withdrawn motion (Document 130) should be 

stricken from the public record. Doing so will preserve the confidentiality of the contents of the 

motion, while the Court considered whether the Renewed Motion should be filed in the public 

docket or should instead by filed under seal. A proposed order to that effect is included below. 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 149 Filed 01/04/06 Page 2 of 3
- 3 -

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO SUBMIT PORTION OF AMD MEDIATION 

STATEMENT TO JAPANESE COURT AND STIPULATED ORDER TO REMOVE ITEM FROM PUBLIC 

DOCKET 

CV 04-03171 (CRB) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: December 28, 2005 Respectfully submitted. 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, VINSON & ELKINS, LLP 

 EVANS & FIGEL, PLLC 

By: /s/ J.C. Rozendaal____________ By: _/s/ Adam V. Floyd________________

 J.C. Rozendaal Adam V. Floyd 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 

OKI AMERICA, INC. et al. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 

STIPULATED ORDER TO REMOVE ITEM FROM PUBLIC DOCKET

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and it appearing that a substantially identical 

motion (the “Renewed Motion”) was lodged with the Court under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-

5 on Dec. 23, 2005, so that the Court might determine whether the contents of the Renewed 

Motion are suitable for inclusion in the public docket or should instead be filed under seal, it is 

hereby

ORDERED that Oki’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Permission to Disclose Portion of 

AMD Mediation Statement to Japanese Court (Document 130, filed Dec. 21, 2005) shall be 

stricken from the public record of these proceedings. The motion will be returned to Oki or 

destroyed. And it is

FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of determining the briefing and argument 

schedule for the Renewed Motion, the Renewed Motion will be deemed to have been filed on the 

date that it was lodged with the Court, December 23, 2005. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________, 2006 ___________________________________ 

 

January 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 149 Filed 01/04/06 Page 3 of 3