Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03567/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03567-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

Case 3:13-cv-03567-EMC Document 201-2 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 2 

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN 

&DOWDLLP 

2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113) 

Post Montgomery Center 

3 One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

4 Telephone: 415/288-4545 

415/288-4534 (fax) 

5 shawnw@rgrdlaw.com 

6 

7 

katerinap@rgrd law .com 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs 

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 

8 JONATHAN GARDNER 

CAROL C. VILLEGAS 

9 140 Broadway 

New York, New York 10005 

10 Telephone: 212/907-0700 

212/818-04 77 (fax) 

11 jgardner@labaton.com 

cvillegas@labaton.com 

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE VOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, 

17 INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION 

18 This Document Relates to: 

19 All Actions. 

) MASTER FILE NO.3: 13-cv-03567 EMC 

) 

) 

) 

) ~ ] ORDER APPROVING 

) PLAN OF ALLOCATION 

) 

) Date: June 23, 2016 

) Time: 1:30 p.m. 

) Judge: The Hon. Edward M. Chen 

) Dep't: 5, 17th Floor 

) 

) 

) 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

_______________________________ ) 

25 This matter having come before the Court on June 23, 2016, on the motion ofLead 

26 Plaintiffs for final approval of the proposed class action Settlement and approval of the proposed 

27 Plan of Allocation for the net proceeds of the Settlement; the Court having considered all papers 

28 filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed; 

MASTER FILE NO. 3:13-cv-03567 EMC 

(PROPOSED] ORDER A PPROVING P LAN OF ALLOCATION 

Case 3:13-cv-03567-EMC Document 210 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:13-cv-03567-EMC Document 201-2 Filed 05/19/16 Page 2 of 2 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 

2 1. This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation and 

3 Agreement of Settlement, dated as of January 14, 2016 (the "Stipulation"), and all capitalized 

4 terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation. 

5 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this application and all 

6 matters relating thereto, including all members of the Settlement Class who have not timely and 

7 validly requested exclusion. 

8 3. Pursuant to and in compliance with Rule 23 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil 

9 Procedure, this Court hereby finds and concludes that due and adequate notice was directed to 

10 persons and entities who are Settlement Class Members, advising them of the proposed Plan of· 

11 Allocation and of their right to object thereto, and a full and fair opportunity was accorded to 

12 persons and entities who are Settlement Class Members to be heard with respect to the Plan of 

13 Allocation. 

14 

15 

4. 

5. 

[There were no objections to the Plan of Allocation.] 

The Court hereby finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation for the 

16 calculation of claims that is set forth in the Notice of Pendency of Class Action, Proposed 

17 Settlement, and Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses (the "Notice") disseminated to class 

18 members provides a fair and reasonable basis upon which to allocate the net settlement proceeds 

19 among class members. 

20 6. The Court hereby finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation set forth in the 

21 Notice is, in all respects, fair and reasonable and the Court hereby approves the Plan of 

--------'------' 2016 

Honorable Edward M. Chen 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

MASTER FILE NO. 3:13-cv-03567 EMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER A PPROVING P LAN OF ALLOCATION 2 

Case 3:13-cv-03567-EMC Document 210 Filed 07/29/16 Page 2 of 2