Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01282/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01282-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRANDON EUGENE HUNTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROLLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:22-cv-01282-EFB (PC)

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is incarcerated in the Sacramento County Main Jail. He proceeds without 

counsel in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 6, 2023, the court informed 

plaintiff that he could proceed with potentially-cognizable claims for deprivation of out-of-cell 

time against defendants Rolland, Calp, Bliss, Haw, Galvez, Ayers, Traxler, Minor, Sacramento 

County, Biagi, and Ahlers or he could file a second amended complaint in an effort to also state 

additional claims including a claim against defendant Kibak. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has elected 

not to amend his complaint and to proceed only with the claims identified by the court. ECF No. 

14. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States 

District Judge to this action.

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Kibak be 

dismissed without prejudice. 

Case 2:22-cv-01282-DC-EFB Document 15 Filed 02/28/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: February 28, 2023. 

Case 2:22-cv-01282-DC-EFB Document 15 Filed 02/28/23 Page 2 of 2