Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02001/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-02001-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CRYSTAL DE LA CRUZ and SERGIO 

DE LA CRUZ, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

JONATHON NANGLE, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:24-cv-2001 DAD AC PS 

ORDER 

 Plaintiffs, proceeding in pro se, filed a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1 and 2. On October 18, 2024, the undersigned granted the motion 

to proceed IFP but rejected the complaint with leave file an amended complaint within 30 days, 

pursuant to the screening process required by the IFP statute. ECF No. 3. Plaintiffs did not file 

an amended complaint. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs shall show cause, in 

writing, within 14 days, why her failure to file an amended complaint should not result in a 

recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an amended 

complaint within this timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order. If plaintiffs 

//// 

//// 

Case 2:24-cv-02001-DAD-AC Document 4 Filed 12/04/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

fails to respond, the court will recommend dismissal of this case pursuant to Local Civil Rule 

110. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: December 3, 2024 

Case 2:24-cv-02001-DAD-AC Document 4 Filed 12/04/24 Page 2 of 2