Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00669/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00669-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Nathan Charles Carey is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On August 1, 2014, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendant’s request for interrogatories. 

Plaintiff’s response must be stricken from the record.

Plaintiff is directed to paragraph eight of the First Informational Order issued May 8, 2014. In 

that order, Plaintiff was specifically advised that “[d]iscovery propounded on a party is self-executing, 

and must be served directly on the party from whom discovery is sought; parties should not file copies 

of their discovery with the court. Local Rules 250.2, 250.3 250.4. Discovery documents 

inappropriately submitted to the court will be returned or stricken. (ECF NO. 3, ¶ 8) (emphasis in 

original). 

///

///

NATHAN CHARLES CAREY,

 Plaintiff,

v.

A. ALPHONSO, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00669-SAB (PC)

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIF’S RESPONSE TO 

DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR 

INTERROGATORIES

[ECF No. 16]

Case 1:13-cv-00669-DAD-SAB Document 17 Filed 08/05/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Because Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s request for interrogatories was inappropriately 

filed with the Court, it is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2014 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00669-DAD-SAB Document 17 Filed 08/05/14 Page 2 of 2