Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00367/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00367-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JARRIS J. SILAGI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JERRY BROWN, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-0367-EFB P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On March 4, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to, within 30 days, submit the 

certified trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). That order warned plaintiff 

that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation of dismissal. The time for 

acting has passed and plaintiff has not submitted the required trust account statement or otherwise 

responded to the court’s order. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States 

District Judge to this case. 

Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

Case 2:15-cv-00367-KJM-EFB Document 14 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: April 15, 2015. 

Case 2:15-cv-00367-KJM-EFB Document 14 Filed 04/15/15 Page 2 of 2