Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01825/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01825-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE DEJESUS RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1825 RRB EFB PS

vs.

PAT MEREZ, SUPERVISOR, SAN

JOAQUIN COUNTY HUMAN

SERVICES AGENCY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, was referred to the undersigned

pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 1, 2007, plaintiff

filed a document styled “Stipulation of Dismissal,” seeking to dismiss the case without

prejudice. The “stipulation,” however, did not contain defense counsel’s signature. On October

4, 2007, counsel for defendants filed a notice of non-opposition and joinder in plaintiff’s request

for dismissal without prejudice.

An action may be dismissed “by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who

have appeared in the action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii). The court finds the parties’ filings

constitute that stipulation and the Clerk is directed to close the case.

DATED: October 10, 2007

Case 2:05-cv-01825-RRB-EFB Document 71 Filed 10/11/07 Page 1 of 1