Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05082/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05082-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Under the Local Rules of this District, Nathaniel was required to file any opposition

or other response to the motion no later than September 2, 2005. See Civil L.R. 7-3

(providing opposition or statement of opposition must be filed no later than 21 days before

hearing date)

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DERRICK NATHANIEL,

Plaintiff,

 v.

NEW UNITED MOTOR MANUFACTURING,

INC., et al.,

Defendants

 /

No. C 04-5082 MMC

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW; TERMINATING

APPLICATION OF ELECTRONIC CASE

FILING PROGRAM TO ACTION

Before the Court is The Armstrong Law Firm’s motion to withdraw as counsel of

record for plaintiff Derrick Nathaniel (“Nathaniel”). Nathaniel has not filed opposition or

other response to the motion.1

 Having considered the papers submitted, the Court deems

the matter appropriate for decision on the papers, VACATES the hearing scheduled for

September 23, 2005, and rules as follows:

1. The motion to withdraw is hereby GRANTED.

2. Because Nathaniel is no longer represented by counsel, the Court hereby

TERMINATES application of the Electronic Case Filing program to the action. All further

Case 3:04-cv-05082-MMC Document 27 Filed 09/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Should Nathaniel’s address change, Nathaniel must promptly file with the Clerk of

the Court and serve on defendant a Notice of Change of Address specifying the new

address. See Civil L.R. 3-11(a).

3

The Pretrial Preparation Order, filed April 4, 2005, erroneously refers to November

10 as “Friday,” when, in fact, it is a Thursday.

2

documents filed in the action shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court on paper and served

by mail or in person on the opposing party.

3. This order and all documents filed in the future shall be served upon Nathaniel at

the following address:2

Derrick Nathaniel

3941 Norton Avenue

Oakland CA 94602

4. A status conference remains scheduled for November 18, 2005, at 10:30 a.m.,

Courtroom 7, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. All parties,

including Nathaniel, are required to attend. Further, a joint status conference statement

remains due on Thursday, November 10, 2005.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2005 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-05082-MMC Document 27 Filed 09/12/05 Page 2 of 2