Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_06-cv-00230/USCOURTS-almd-2_06-cv-00230-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION

WAYNE N. WARD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-CV-230-WKW

) (WO)

LABORATORY CORPORATION OF )

AMERICA, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On March 10, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 14) in this case

to which no timely objections have been filed. 

After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and

DECREE of the court that:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.

2. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 2) filed by the defendant law firms described in the

Complaint as Wiggins, Childs, Quinn, and Pantazis/WCQP and Gordon, Silberman,

Wiggins and Childs/GSWC, is GRANTED, and all claims against these defendants

are dismissed with prejudice.

3. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc.# 6) filed by the defendant law firm, Hill, Hill, Carter,

Franco, Cole & Black, P.C., is GRANTED, and all claims against this defendant are

dismissed with prejudice, with the alternative Motion for More Definite Statement

being DENIED as MOOT.

4. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 8) is GRANTED on behalf of defendants Dynacare

Case 2:06-cv-00230-WKW-DRB Document 15 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Laboratories, Inc., Laboratory Corporation of America, and Frilot, Partridge, Kohnke

& Clements, L.C., and all claims against these defendants are dismissed with

prejudice.

5. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE this the 1st day of June, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00230-WKW-DRB Document 15 Filed 06/01/06 Page 2 of 2