Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-14-04140/USCOURTS-ca10-14-04140-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 

---

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL DAVID EGLI,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-4140

(D. Utah)

(Nos. 2:14-CV-00699-TC and 

2:04-CR-00577-TC-1)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before HARTZ, TYMKOVICH, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. 

 

 Daniel David Egli, a federal prisoner incarcerated in Louisiana, apparently was 

convicted of a federal offense in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. 

He filed in that court a motion for relief from his conviction under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 60. Relying on our opinion in United States v. Triplett, 166 F. App’x 362, 

 

* After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined 

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this 

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore 

ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding 

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral 

estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. 

P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

April 10, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-4140 Document: 01019413846 Date Filed: 04/10/2015 Page: 1 
2 

365‒66 (10th Cir. 2006), the district court denied the motion because Rule 60 does not 

apply to criminal cases. Mr. Egli appeals from the denial. We AFFIRM, because the 

district court was correct. If there were any colorable merit to Mr. Egli’s arguments, we 

might be tempted to recategorize his district-court pleading. But there is no temptation 

here. Appellant’s motion to “Certify Constitutional Question” is denied. Appellant’s 

motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied and appellant is ordered to pay the filing 

fee to the district court forthwith. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

 Harris L Hartz 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 14-4140 Document: 01019413846 Date Filed: 04/10/2015 Page: 2