Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-360/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-03561 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE RE TECHNICALLY

NECESSARY COPYING

In its response to ECF 1757, Google shall SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not order

it established that the 62 classes and interfaces in three API packages (and only those 62) were

technically necessary to use the Java language and that copying those was fair use, without

prejudice to either side’s other arguments, pro or con, as to the 37 APIs. Also, please comment

on whether all expert reports should be adjusted to incorporate this holding (but only this

adjustment). 

Oracle shall also show cause in writing why this order should not be entered by

TUESDAY AT NOON. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1765 Filed 04/30/16 Page 1 of 1