Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-02218/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-02218-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 09cv2218

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRACE L. SANDOVAL,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 09cv2218 JM(BLM)

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

vs. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

WENDY LYON

Defendant.

Over the past several years, Plaintiff Grace L. Sandoval has filed in excess of 60 separate

actions in this district. 08cv1297, 08cv1621, 08cv1623, 08cv1853, 98cv1854, 08cv1868, 08cv1870,

08cv1944, 08cv2004, 08cv2005, 08cv2057, 08cv2104, 08cv2105, 09cv0269, 09cv0422, 09cv423,

09cv0424, 09cv0437, 09cv0438, 09cv0455, 09cv0456, 09cv0475, 09cv0476, 09cv582, 09cv585,

09cv586, 09cv1232, 09cv1507, 09cv1508, 09cv1515, 09cv1520, 09cv1524, 09cv1526, 09cv2122,

09cv2141, 09cv2148, 09cv2204, 09cv2205, 09cv2206, 09cv2217, 09cv2218, 08cv1622, 09cv0477,

09cv0478, 09cv493, 09cv1506, 09cv1849, 09cv0491, 08cv1848, 08cv1869, 08cv2151, 09cv0588,

09cv0600, 09cv0441, 09cv0454, 09cv0474, 09cv0492, 09cv0494, 09cv0495, 09cv0583, 09cv0642,

09cv1514. Each action was brought in propria persona and in forma pauperis. Each appears to have

been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. The present complaint fairs no better.

Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Wendy Lyon, in concert with numerous other individuals, including

O. J. Simpson, are involved in stealing cars, organized crime, rape and murder. In some indiscernible

manner, they were also allegedly involved in an automobile crash involving her vehicle. Pursuant to

Case 3:09-cv-02218-JM-BLM Document 5 Filed 10/19/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The court notes that this order precluding Plaintiff from further filings in this case is a drastic

and extraordinary step warranted under the circumstances. A review of many of Plaintiffs filings

indicate that even after the dismissal of the complaint as frivolous or for failure to state a claim,

Plaintiff continues to send letters or other documents to the district court judge or magistrate judge

assigned to the case. 

- 2 - 09cv2218

28 U.S.C. §1915(e) the court dismisses the complaint at bar as frivolous and for failure to state a

claim.

The Clerk of Court is instructed to dismiss the action without prejudice as frivolous and for

failure to state a claim. Until Plaintiff pays the filing fee or demonstrates an imminent danger of

serious physical injury, the Clerk of Court is instructed to reject for filing any further documents from

Plaintiff in this case.1 The court also denies Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and for

appointment of counsel as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 19, 2009

 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller

 United States District Judge

cc: All parties

Case 3:09-cv-02218-JM-BLM Document 5 Filed 10/19/09 Page 2 of 2