Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03527/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03527-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

POOROUSHASB PARINEH, individually,

AUSTIAG PARINEH, individually and as

co-trustee of the Parineh Family

Irrevocable Trust dated June 24, 1996

(“PFIT”), HORMOZ PARINEH,

individually and as co-trustee of the PFIT,

and KHASHAYAR PARINEH,

individually and as co-trustee of the PFIT,

Defendants. /

No. C 12-03527 WHA

ORDER DENYING

POOROUSHASB PARINEH’S

THIRD MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION,

ORDERING DISBURSEMENT OF

FUNDS, AND TEMPORARILY

STAYING ORDER TO DISBURSE

FUNDS

In this interpleader action, an order granted summary judgment for the co-contingent

beneficiaries on a life insurance policy, Austiag Parineh, Hormoz Parineh, and Khashayar

Parineh, and against the primary beneficiary, Pooroushasb Parineh, on the basis that

Pooroushasb had been convicted of the murder of the decedent. An order denied Pooroushasb’s

“Motion to Suppress the Summary Judgement [sic],” which was construed as a motion for

reconsideration (Dkt. No. 61). An order also denied his second motion for reconsideration

(Dkt. No. 63). Pooroushasb has now made a third. This motion again reiterates Pooroushasb’s

denials of his guilt. He also asserts that his conviction, which has been affirmed by the

California Court of Appeal and denied review by the California Supreme Court, is not final, but

offers no support for that bare assertion. Moreover, he offers no grounds for reconsideration. 

Case 3:12-cv-03527-WHA Document 65 Filed 11/02/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Pooroushasb’s third motion for reconsideration is DENIED. 

Pooroushasb requested “the necessary forms for appeal and the forms for indigency.” 

There is no form for an appeal. Pooroushasb must follow the procedures for filing a notice of

appeal in this Court if he wishes to appeal the judgment against him. (Though this order takes

no position on whether such an appeal would be timely.) The Clerk shall please include the

Court’s form for application to proceed in forma pauperis when serving this order. 

This order hereby AUTHORIZES the Court Registry to distribute the proceeds, plus any

earned interest, to Austiaj Parineh, Astiag Hormoz Parineh, and Khashayar Parineh, in equal

shares. The effect of that order, however, is STAYED until DECEMBER 7, to allow Pooroushasb

Parineh to docket an appeal and seek a stay of ths disbursement, failing which, the Court

Registry shall disburse the funds upon expiration of the stay by this Court. (This order takes no

position on whether an appeal would be timely or a stay would be appropriate.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 2, 2016. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:12-cv-03527-WHA Document 65 Filed 11/02/16 Page 2 of 2