Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-06532/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-06532-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN L. MURPHY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

STEVEN CAMBRA,

Defendant. 

 /

1:01-cv-06532-OWW-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

(Docs. 100, 104, 116)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT FOR

DEFENDANT 

Plaintiff Kevin L. Murphy (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On April 20, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. 

Case 1:01-cv-06532-OWW -LJO Document 120 Filed 07/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On July 2, 2007, after obtaining an extension of time, plaintiff

filed an Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 20, 2007,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed November

20, 2006, is DENIED;

3. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, filed

November 20, 2006, is GRANTED; and,

4. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for

defendant and against plaintiff. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:01-cv-06532-OWW -LJO Document 120 Filed 07/30/07 Page 2 of 2