Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01882/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01882-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VYACHESLAV KHOMICH, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-10-1882 GEB KJM PS

vs.

BANK OF AMERICA N.A., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Calendared for hearing on August 25, 2010 is defendants’ motion to dismiss. No opposition to

the motion has been filed. 

Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o

party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition

to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 78-230(i)

provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may

result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local

Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or

within the inherent power of the Court.”

1

Case 2:10-cv-01882-GEB -KJM Document 12 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of August 25, 2010 is vacated. Hearing on defendants’

motion is continued to September 29, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion no later than September 15,

2010 . Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of nonopposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: August 13, 2010.

006

khomich.nop

2

Case 2:10-cv-01882-GEB -KJM Document 12 Filed 08/13/10 Page 2 of 2