Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00672/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00672-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

700478978v1 

 Stipulation re: Excess Pages 

 No. C-06-0672-VRW 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

BRUCE A. ERICSON #76342 

DAVID L. ANDERSON #149604 

JACOB R. SORENSEN #209134 

MARC H. AXELBAUM #209855 

BRIAN J. WONG #226940 

DANIEL J. RICHERT #232208 

50 Fremont Street 

Post Office Box 7880 

San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 

Telephone: (415) 983-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 

Email: bruce.ericson@pillsburylaw.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

DAVID W. CARPENTER (admitted pro hac vice) 

DAVID L. LAWSON (admitted pro hac vice) 

BRADFORD A. BERENSON (admitted pro hac vice) 

EDWARD R. McNICHOLAS (admitted pro hac vice) 

1501 K Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Telephone: (202) 736-8010 

Facsimile: (202) 736-8711 

Attorneys for Defendants 

AT&T CORP. and AT&T INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS, 

CAROLYN JEWEL and ERIK KNUTZEN 

on Behalf of Themselves and All Others 

Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

AT&T CORP., AT&T INC. and DOES 1-20, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. C-06-0672-VRW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER GRANTING AT&T CORP. 

LEAVE TO FILE EXCESS PAGES 

[Civil L.R. 7-4, 7-12] 

Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

Hearing: June 23, 2006 

Time: 9:30 a.m. 

Case 3:06-cv-00672-VRW Document 263 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

700478978v1 - 1 - Stipulation re: Excess Pages 

No. C-06-0672-VRW 

RECITALS 

A. Defendant AT&T Corp. (“AT&T”) filed a motion to dismiss. Dkt. 86. 

B. Plaintiffs filed an opposition containing 29 pages of text. Dkt. 176. 

C. AT&T seeks leave to file a reply of 18 pages, three pages more than 

provided for by Civil Local Rule 7-3(d). 

STIPULATION 

Plaintiffs and AT&T, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby 

stipulate that AT&T may file a reply to Dkt. 176 of not more than 18 pages. This 

stipulation applies only to AT&T’s reply to Dkt. 176 and not to any other brief that AT&T 

may be filing. 

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45, § X.B 

I, BRUCE A. ERICSON, hereby declare pursuant to General Order 45, § X.B, that I 

have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory listed 

below. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing declaration is true and correct. 

Executed on June 16, 2006, at San Francisco, California. 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

BRUCE A. ERICSON 

DAVID L. ANDERSON 

JACOB R. SORENSEN 

MARC H. AXELBAUM 

BRIAN J. WONG 

50 Fremont Street 

Post Office Box 7880 

San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

DAVID W. CARPENTER 

BRADFORD BERENSON 

EDWARD R. McNICHOLAS 

DAVID L. LAWSON 

1501 K Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

By /s/ Bruce A. Ericson 

Bruce A. Ericson 

Attorneys for Defendants 

 AT&T CORP. and AT&T INC. 

Case 3:06-cv-00672-VRW Document 263 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

700478978v1 - 2 - Stipulation re: Excess Pages

 No. C-06-0672-VRW

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 

CINDY COHN 

LEE TIEN 

KURT OPSAHL 

KEVIN S. BANKSTON 

CORYNNE MCSHERRY 

JAMES S. TYRE 

454 Shotwell Street 

San Francisco, CA 94110 

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

 RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

REED R. KATHREIN 

JEFF D. FRIEDMAN 

SHANA E. SCARLETT 

100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

TRABER & VOORHEES 

BERT VOORHEES 

THERESA M. TRABER 

128 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 204 

Pasadena, CA 91103 

LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD R. WIEBE 

RICHARD R. WIEBE 

425 California Street, Suite 2025 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

By ____/s/ Cindy Cohn________________________ 

Cindy Cohn 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the above stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that 

AT&T may file a reply to Dkt. 176 of not more than 18 pages. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June __, 2006. 

__________________________________________

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

United States Chief District Judge 

20

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:06-cv-00672-VRW Document 263 Filed 06/20/06 Page 3 of 3