Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00820/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00820-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Leonard Johnson is proceeding in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 22, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation which was 

served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that Objections to the Findings and 

Recommendation were to be filed within thirty days. No Objections were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

///

///

///

LEONARD JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff,

v.

HUMBERTO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00820-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION, DENYING DEFENDANT 

RODRIGUEZ’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT, AND REFERRING MATTER BACK 

TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FURTHER 

PROCEEDINGS

[ECF No. 33]

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 34 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed on December 22, 2014, is adopted in full; and

2. Defendant Rodriguez’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 9, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00820-SAB Document 34 Filed 02/09/15 Page 2 of 2