Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01385/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01385-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The Court also agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s alternative

determination that the habeas petition is also subject to dismissal pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1)(A) because the petitioner’s sole claim was never raised in

state court and is thus unexhausted.

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Glen Russell Wingfield,

Petitioner,

vs.

Charles L. Ryan. et al.,

Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-1385-PHX-PGR (MHB)

 

 ORDER

Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Burns notwithstanding that no party has filed any objection to the Report

and Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly

determined that the petitioner’s habeas petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254, must be dismissed because it was filed after the AEDPA’s one-year

limitations period had expired.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(doc. #13) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Case 2:09-cv-01385-PGR Document 14 Filed 01/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

- 2 -

Corpus by a Person in State Custody Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied as

time-barred and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the

Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue.

DATED this 25th day of January, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-01385-PGR Document 14 Filed 01/26/10 Page 2 of 2