Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00705/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00705-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales

---

1

17-cv-00705-JM-JLB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Annette Harrison,

Plaintiff,

v.

Great Healthworks, Inc.,

Defendant.

Case No.: 17-cv-00705-JM-JLB

ORDER GRANTING JOINT 

MOTION TO MODIFY AMENDED 

SCHEDULING ORDER

[ECF Nos. 16, 36, 48, 52]

Having read and considered the Joint Motion to Modify Amended Scheduling Order

and finding good cause therefor, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion (ECF No. 52).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Order, entered on August 3, 2017 

(ECF No. 16) and the Amended Scheduling Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Ex 

Parte Application, entered on February 28, 2018 (ECF No. 48) are amended as follows:

1. For purposes of class certification, by March 23, 2018, GHW will produce all 

available call recordings, including all recordings reflecting all inbound, outbound and/or 

transferred calls for 20 individuals (from the 100-person Sample) as identified by 

Plaintiffs’ counsel in an email of March 7, 2018;

2. The deadline for initial expert reports regarding class certification (which was 

verbally re-set by the Court on a March 7, 2018 telephone call to March 16, 2018) is

extended by 21 days to April 6, 2018, and the deadline for rebuttal expert reports (currently 

April 6, 2018) is extended by 28 days to May 4, 2018;

3. The deadline for the filing of Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification 

(currently April 6, 2018) is extended by 21 days to April 27, 2018. Counsel for the moving 

Case 3:17-cv-00705-JM-JLB Document 53 Filed 03/12/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

17-cv-00705-JM-JLB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will hear the 

motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion date and the hearing 

date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. Failure to make 

a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. Further, the 

parties are directed to place a joint call to Judge Burkhardt’s chambers within 3 days of the 

docketing of an order ruling on class certification in this case to notify the Court of the 

need for a scheduling order for the remainder of the case;

4. GHW will produce for the entire 100-person Sample all contact information 

for the former employees/contractors involved with any of the calls in the Sample by March 

9, 2018. However, the contact information for the former employees/contractors involved 

with the calls selected for production by March 23, 2018 will be produced by March 23, 

2018;

5. GHW will produce for the entire 100-person Sample complete screen shots of 

the pages identified by Plaintiffs as of March 7, 2018 by no later than March 23, 2018; and

6. This scheduling order does not otherwise alter the Court’s prior scheduling 

orders (see ECF Nos. 16, 36, 48).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2018

Case 3:17-cv-00705-JM-JLB Document 53 Filed 03/12/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2