Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-96/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 05-CV-3148 MMC [JCS]

[Proposed] Order Granting Matsushita’s Request to File Documents Under Seal 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

MEDIATEK, INC., OPPO DIGITAL, INC., and

MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL 

COMPUTER CORP., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC [JCS] 

ORDER GRANTING MATSUSHITA’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

RELIEF TO FILE DOCUMENTS 

UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO L.R. 79-

5(d)

MEDIATEK, INC., 

Counterclaimant, 

v.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD. and PANASONIC CORPORATION 

OF NORTH AMERICA, 

Counterclaim Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Judge: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1127 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 1 - 

Case No. 05-CV-3148 MMC [JCS]

[Proposed] Order Granting Matsushita’s Request to File Documents Under Seal 

Having considered Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Matsushita Electric Industrial 

Co., Ltd. and Counterclaim Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America’s (collectively, 

“Matsushita”) Unopposed Administrative Motion for Relief to File Documents Under Seal and 

the Declaration of Keith P. Gray Pursuant to L.R. 79-5(d), the Court finds that good cause exists 

for granting Matsushita’s requested relief. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall file unredacted versions of the following 

documents under seal: 

 1. Matsushita’s Reply Memorandum in Support of its Objections to Magistrate 

Judge Spero’s Orders Re Settlement Negotiation Documents; 

 2. Declaration of Aldo A. Badini in Support of Matsushita’s Reply Memorandum in 

Support of its Objections to Magistrate Judge Spero’s Orders Re Settlement Negotiation 

Documents (“Badini Reply Declaration”); and 

 3. Exhibit 1 to the Badini Reply Declaration. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 21, 2007 

_________________________________________

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1127 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 2