Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01201/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01201-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY A. PATE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1201 FCD DAD P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPUTIES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 29, 2007, defendant deputy sheriff

Garcia filed a motion for summary judgment or adjudication. Plaintiff has not filed his

opposition to the motion.

Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file

written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any

opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” On November 16, 2006, plaintiff was advised of

the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion for summary judgment and that failure to

oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. 

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01201-FCD-DAD Document 66 Filed 01/09/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.” In the order filed November 16, 2006, plaintiff was advised that

failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of

this order, plaintiff shall file his opposition, if any, to the defendant’s motion for summary

judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and

shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b).

DATED: January 9, 2008.

DAD:4

pate1201.noppo

Case 2:04-cv-01201-FCD-DAD Document 66 Filed 01/09/08 Page 2 of 2