Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_11-cv-08126/USCOURTS-azd-3_11-cv-08126-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 130
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40:270 Miller Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Gingerbread House, Inc.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

Montana Builders, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CV 11-8126-PCT-PGR

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Gingerbread House’s motion for entry of default

judgment. (Doc. 16.)

On August 17, 2009, Defendant Montana Builders entered into a contract with the

United States to furnish materials and perform labor for the construction of the Pine Flat

Camp Ground Project. (Doc. 1, ¶ III.) On August 26, 2009, Montana Builders, as principal,

and Defendant Surety Partners delivered their bond to the United States as required by the

Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3133. (Id., ¶ VI.) On October 6, 2009, Gingerbread House entered

into a contract with Montana Builders. (Id., ¶ VII.)

Gingerbread House furnished labor and equipment under the contract. (Id., ¶ VIII.)

The reasonable and agreed value of such labor was $281,329, of which Montana Builders has

paid $250,745, leaving a balance due of $30,584. (Id.) Gingerbread House performed extra

labor and provided additional materials with a reasonable value of $7,021.50, which Montana

Builders has not paid. Payment was due August 20, 2010. (Id.)

Case 3:11-cv-08126-PGR Document 17 Filed 03/28/12 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

On August 15, 2011, Gingerbread House filed a complaint under the Miller Act. (Doc.

1.) Defendants failed to answer and on December 2, 2011, default was entered under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). (Doc. 14.) Gingerbread House now moves for default

judgment. (Doc. 16.)

After a default has been entered and the defendant fails to appear or move to set aside

the default under Rule 55(c), the Court may, on the plaintiff’s motion, enter a default

judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). Granting default judgment is within the Court’s sound

discretion. See Albade v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980). The Court may

consider such factors as the possibility of prejudice to the plaintiff, the merits of the

substantive claim, the sufficiency of the complaint, the sum of money at stake, the possibility

of a dispute concerning material facts, whether the default was due to excusable neglect, and

the policy favoring decisions on the merits. See Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471–72

(9th Cir. 1986).

In considering these factors, all factual allegations in the plaintiff’s complaint are

taken as true, except those relating to damages. TeleVideo Sys., Inc. v. Heidenthal, 826 F.2d

915, 917–18 (9th Cir. 1987). A plaintiff is required to prove all damages sought in the

complaint. 

Taking the allegations in the complaint as true, as required by Defendants’ default,

the Court finds that Gingerbread House is entitled to default judgment under the factors set

forth in Eitel, 782 F.2d at 1471–72. The claim is meritorious. Gingerbread House will be

prejudiced and potentially left without recourse for recovery if default judgment is denied.

There are no disputes concerning the relevant facts. It is unlikely that Defendants’ default is

the result of excusable neglect.

Gingerbread House seeks judgment of in the amount of $39,130.18, consisting of the

principal sum of $37,605.50, $1094.68 for attorneys’ fees, and $430.00 in costs. (Doc. 16.)

In support, Gingerbread House has submitted counsel’s affidavit and statements of costs and

fees. (Docs. 12, 13, Exs. 1, 2.) The Court finds that these amounts are reasonably calculated

Case 3:11-cv-08126-PGR Document 17 Filed 03/28/12 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

and sufficient to prove Plaintiff’s damages.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED granting Gingerbread House’s motion for entry of default judgment

(Doc. 16) against Montana Builders, LLC, and Surety Partners, LLP, in the amount of

$39,130.18, consisting of the principal sum of $37,605.50, $1094.68 for attorneys’ fees, and

$430.00 in costs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment

accordingly.

DATED this 28th day of March, 2012.

Case 3:11-cv-08126-PGR Document 17 Filed 03/28/12 Page 3 of 3