Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00017/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00017-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN TROY STURGES, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

MATTHEW KRAMER, Warden, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

____________________________________)

CV F 05 0017 AWI LJO HC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH A

COURT ORDER

[Doc. #4]

On February 4, 2005, an Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response was issued and

directed to Respondent. Respondent was granted ninety (90) days in which to comply with the Court

order. However, over ninety (90) days have passed and the Court has not received the Court ordered

response. 

Local Rule 11-110 provides: “Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or

with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions

authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” 

Accordingly, Respondent is HEREBY ORDERED to, within thirty (30) days of service of

this order, SHOW CAUSE why appropriate sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply

with a court order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 1, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00017-GSA Document 8 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 1