Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01773/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01773-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS GOOLSBY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CATE, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:11cv01773 DLB PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL 

OPPOSITION

(Document 51)

Plaintiff Thomas Goolsby (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding 

on First Amendment retaliation claims and due process claims against Defendants Holland, 

Steadman, Gutierrez, Noyce, Tyree, Gentry, Eubanks, Medrano and Holman.

Defendants’ November 26, 2013, Motion to Dismiss is currently pending. Plaintiff 

opposed the motion on January 6, 2014.

On January 10, 2014, the Court granted Defendants a 60 day extension of time to file a 

reply.

On January 28, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to supplement his opposition, along with his 

supplemental opposition. Plaintiff bases his request, in part, on newly available exhibits.

Case 1:11-cv-01773-LJO-DLB Document 53 Filed 01/30/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendants’ reply is not due until on or about March 5, 2014. Accordingly, because 

Defendants will have a chance to address the supplement in their reply, Plaintiff’s motion is 

GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2014 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

9b0hied

Case 1:11-cv-01773-LJO-DLB Document 53 Filed 01/30/14 Page 2 of 2