Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO PARTICIPATE IN PRIVATE MEDIATION PROCESS

Hassan A. Zavareei (SBN 181547)

hzavareei@tzlegal.com

TYCKO AND ZAVAREEI, LLP

2000 L Street, N.W., Suite 808

Washington, DC 20036

Tel.: (202) 973-0900

Fax: (202) 973-0950

Attorney for Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Julie 

McKinney, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal,

Jennifer Reilly, and Justin Bartolet

LOCKE LORD LLP

Susan J. Welde (SBN: 205401)

swelde@lockelord.com

300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2600

Los Angeles, California 90071

Telephone: (213) 485-1500

Facsimile: (213) 485-1200

LOCKE LORD LLP

Martin Jaszczuk (Pro Hac Vice)

mjaszczuk@lockelord.com

Nick J. Di Giovanni (Pro Hac Vice)

ndigiovanni@lockelord.com

111 S. Wacker Drive

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Telephone: (312) 443-0700

Facsimile: (312) 443-0336

Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, 

Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JAMES LATHROP, JULIE MCKINNEY, 

JONATHAN GRINDELL, SANDEEP PAL, 

JENNIFER REILLY, and JUSTIN BARTOLET 

on behalf of themselves and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Civil Action No.: 14-cv-05678-JST

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

STIPULATION TO PARTICIPATE IN 

PRIVATE MEDIATION PROCESS

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 58 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

– 1 –

STIPULATION TO PARTICIPATE IN PRIVATE MEDIATION PROCESS

Plaintiffs JAMES LATHROP, JULIE MCKINNEY, JONATHAN GRINDELL, SANDEEP 

PAL, JENNIFER REILLY, and JUSTIN BARTOLET and Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, 

INC. (collectively, “the Parties”) hereby submit, through the undersigned counsel of record, the 

following Stipulation to Participate in Private Mediation Process. In support of this stipulation, the 

Parties state as follows:

1. Plaintiffs filed their initial Complaint on December 31, 2014. 

2. On March 13, 2015, the parties filed their Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting 

ADR Process. See Docket No. 30. In that Stipulation, the parties agreed to participate in mediation 

using the Court’s process by November 30, 2015. 

3. On April 29, 2015, the parties timely filed their Joint Case Management Statement. 

See Docket No. 37. In that Joint Case Management Statement, the parties agreed to conduct 

mediation by February 16, 2016.

4. On July 19, 2015, the Court granted in part and dismissed in part Defendant’s partial 

Motion to Dismiss. See Docket No. 49. 

5. The parties have had further meet and confer discussions concerning mediation and 

have agreed that a private mediation is preferable to the Court process. Pending the Court’s 

approval, the parties have agreed to conduct a private mediation with a mediator agreeable to both 

parties. The parties do not currently have a private mediation scheduled, but will schedule such a 

mediation when they believe that it will be productive.

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through the 

undersigned, as follows:

1. Provided that the Court approves, the Parties agree to participate in private mediation 

with a mediator to be jointly approved by the parties.

2. The Parties agree that the case should be removed from the Court’s mediation 

program.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 58 Filed 09/02/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

– 2 –

STIPULATION TO PARTICIPATE IN PRIVATE MEDIATION PROCESS

DATED: September 2, 2015 TYCKO AND ZAVAREEI, LLP

By /s/ Hassan A. Zavareei

Hassan A. Zavareei

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DATED: September 2, 2015 LOCKE LORD LLP

By /s/ Martin W. Jaszczuk

Martin W. Jaszczuk

Attorneys for Defendant 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________ __________________________________ The Honorable Jon S. Tigar UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

September 2, 2015

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 58 Filed 09/02/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

– 3 –

FILER’S ATTESTATION

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that 

all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation.

DATED: September 2, 2015 TYCKO AND ZAVAREEI, LLP

By /s/ Hassan A. Zavareei

Hassan A. Zavareei

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 58 Filed 09/02/15 Page 4 of 4