Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00798/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00798-103/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOOP AI LABS INC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANNA GATTI, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)

ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION

Re: Dkt. No. 727

The court has received Defendant Almawave USA, Inc.’s (“Almawave”) motion for leave 

to file a motion for reconsideration of the court’s June 3, 2016 order on Almawave’s motions 

regarding expert discovery, Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc.’s opposition thereto, and Almawave’s 

reply. [Docket Nos. 727, 744, 757.] 

On May 27, 2016, Almawave filed an administrative motion for leave to file a unilateral 

letter brief regarding the depositions of Plaintiff’s expert witnesses, seeking an order 1) 

compelling the depositions of Plaintiff’s expert witnesses; or 2) allowing the expert depositions to 

take place after the June 7, 2016 expert discovery cutoff so that it could re-serve the deposition 

subpoenas. [Docket No. 714.] In its response, Plaintiff indicated that its experts would 

voluntarily appear for their depositions on June 1 and 2, 2016 as scheduled. [Docket No. 716.] 

Therefore, on June 3, 2016, the court denied Almawave’s motion for leave to file a unilateral letter 

brief as moot in light of Plaintiff’s representation. [Docket No. 719.] In other words, the court 

denied Almawave’s motion because it appeared that the parties had reached an agreement about 

the depositions. Based on the briefing related to Almawave’s motion for leave to file a motion for 

reconsideration, it is clear that the parties have not reached an agreement about Plaintiff’s experts’ 

depositions. Thus, Almawave’s original administrative motion for leave to file a unilateral letter 

brief regarding the depositions of Plaintiff’s expert witnesses is not moot. The administrative 

Case 4:15-cv-00798-HSG Document 765 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

motion is granted. Almawave shall file a two-page unilateral letter brief regarding the depositions 

by no later than June 24, 2016. Plaintiff’s opposition shall not exceed two pages and shall be filed 

by no later than June 29, 2016. Almawave’s motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration 

is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 22, 2016

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:15-cv-00798-HSG Document 765 Filed 06/22/16 Page 2 of 2