Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05397/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05397-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The United States Postal Service returned the findings and recommendations on July 17, 2007, as undeliverable.

1

A notation on the envelope indicates that plaintiff paroled from prison. However, plaintiff has not notified the court of any

change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER LEE JENKINS, 1:02-cv-05397-LJO-SMS-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS & 

 RECOMMENDATIONS (#73)

DERRAL ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

_____________________________/

Christopher Lee Jenkins (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

 On July 11, 2007, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

defendants’ motion to dismiss this action be granted on the grounds that plaintiff failed to exhaust

his administrative remedies. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings

and recommendations within thirty days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise

responded to the findings and recommendations.

1

Case 1:02-cv-05397-LJO -SMS Document 75 Filed 09/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-

305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on July 11,

2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss this action is granted on the grounds that plaintiff

failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. This action is dismissed in its entirety, and the Clerk

is directed to close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 25, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05397-LJO -SMS Document 75 Filed 09/25/07 Page 2 of 2