Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05718/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05718-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARAN JIT SINGH, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

)

JOHN ASHCROFT, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

____________________________________)

CV F 04-5718 OWW WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE DISMISSAL FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULE

83-183 

Petitioner, at least formerly in the custody of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs

Enforcement (BICE) and proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

On May 2, 2005, the Magistrate Judge entered findings and recommendations herein. 

These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty

days. No objections were filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

Case 1:04-cv-05718-OWW -WMW Document 18 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

(9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

May 2, 2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This petition is dismissed without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case and to enter judgment for

Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 15, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05718-OWW -WMW Document 18 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2