Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00844/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00844-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OTIS T. MOORE, and

KRISTINA A. MOORE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:19-cv-0844-JAM-KJN PS

ORDER

(ECF No. 21.)

On December 6, 2019 the Court conducted a pretrial scheduling conference, but refrained

from issuing a full scheduling order. (ECF No. 19.) Instead, the Court ordered initial disclosures 

be exchanged no later than January 7, 2020, along with the parties updating the Court on, among 

other things, whether they could obtain records from the juvenile court. A February 6, 2020

status conference was set, with a joint statement due a week prior. The joint statement (ECF No. 

21) indicates Defendants have yet to obtain the records, and also that they intend to file a Rule 12 

motion “in the very near future.” Therefore, the Court will delay issuing a discovery and pretrial 

schedule, at this time. If Defendants have not filed their Rule 12 motion by no later than March 

5, 2020, the Court will issue a scheduling order based on the joint statement. The Court hereby 

VACATES the February 6, 2020 hearing.

Dated: February 3, 2020

Case 2:19-cv-00844-JAM-KJN Document 22 Filed 02/03/20 Page 1 of 1