Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-57/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC (DMR)

ORDER RE PROPOSED SECOND 

AMENDED STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 467

The court has received the parties’ proposed second amended stipulated protective order. 

[Docket No. 467.] It is not clear how this proposed stipulated protective order differs from the 

November 26, 2014 amended protective order (Docket No. 208), since the parties did not submit a 

redlined version for the court’s review. By no later than February 9, 2016, the parties shall submit 

a brief joint statement describing the differences between the two protective orders and explaining

why such changes are necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2016

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 471 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 1