Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01826/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-md-01826-37/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

COOLEY GODWARD 

KRONISH LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING CERTAIN 

PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLASS CERT. FILINGS

M:07-CV-01826-WHA 

COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP 

STEPHEN C. NEAL (170085) (sneal@cooley.com) 

JOHN C. DWYER (136533) (dwyerjc@cooley.com) 

JAMES DONATO (146140) (jdonato@cooley.com) 

WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463) (wsomvichian@cooley.com) 

JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083) (jgutkin@cooley.com) 

101 California Street, 5th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 

Telephone: (415) 693-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 

Attorneys for Defendant 

NVIDIA CORPORATION 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

MARGARET M. ZWISLER (margaret.zwisler@lw.com) 

AMANDA P. REEVES (amanda.reeves@lw.com) 

555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Telephone: (202) 637-2200 

Facsimile: (202) 637-2201 

CHARLES H. SAMEL (SBN 182019) (charles.samel@lw.com) 

JENNIFER A. CARMASSI (SBN 221592) (jennifer.carmassi@lw.com) 

355 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, California 90071-1560 

Telephone: (213) 485-1234 

Facsimile: (213) 891-8763 

Attorneys for Defendants ATI Technologies ULC, 

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., AMD US Finance, Inc., and 

1252986 Alberta ULC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNITS 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS 

Case No. M:07-cv-01826-WHA 

MDL No. 1826 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING

CERTAIN PORTIONS OF CERTAIN

CLASS CERTIFICATION FILINGS

Case 3:07-md-01826-WHA Document 518 Filed 07/22/08 Page 1 of 3
COOLEY GODWARD 

KRONISH LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING CERTAIN 

PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLASS CERT. FILINGS

M:07-CV-01826-WHA 

Pursuant to this Court’s July 11, 2008 Order (docket entry # 492) preliminarily approving 

the sealing of certain documents and passages listed in the July 9, 2008 responses by Defendant 

NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA”) and Defendants ATI Technologies ULC (formerly ATI 

Technologies, Inc.), Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., AMD US Finance, Inc. and 1252986 Alberta 

ULC (collectively, “ATI Defendants”) to the Court’s request for information regarding pending 

motions to seal, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following documents and/or information shall remain 

under seal in this matter: 

(A) (Docket Entry # 318) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of 

Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification – the only full paragraph on page 19 

of Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (lines 6-16). 

(B) (Docket Entry # 319) Declaration of Michael P. Lehmann in Support of Indirect 

Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification – exhibits 1 and 2. 

(C) (Exhibit A to Docket Entry # 326) Expert Report of David J. Teece – paragraphs 

50, sentences 4-7 and 9-13 (lines 5-12 and 15-24 of page 24), and 51, sentences 2-4 (on lines 2-12 

of page 25), and footnotes 53-58. 

(D) (Exhibit to Docket Entry # 373) Expert Report of Michelle Burtis Regarding 

Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification – paragraphs 52, 55, and 56; footnotes 

55, 56, 63-65, 68, 69, 77, 79, 81, 82, 98, and 108; exhibits D-6, D-15b, and D-17b; and exhibits 

D-5, D-19, D-20, D-22, D-23, D-24, D-25, D-26, D-27, D-28, D-29, D-30, D-31, D-31a, D-32, 

D-32a, D-33, D-33a, D-34, D-34a, D-35, D-35a, D-36, D-36a, D-37, D-37a, D-38, D-38a, D-42a, 

D-42b, D-42c, D-48, and D-49 (customer and product names only). 

(E) (Exhibit A to Docket Entry # 374) Expert Report of Michelle Burtis Regarding 

Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification – paragraphs 82 and 86; paragraphs 

95 and 107 (customer and product names only); footnotes 100-103 and 105; footnotes 61, 97, 99, 

and 114 (customer and product names only); exhibit I-33; and exhibits I-29, I-30, I-31, I-34, I-35, 

I-37, I-38, I-41, and I-42 (customer and product names only). 

(F) (Docket Entry # 375) Declaration of Jeffrey D. Fisher in Support of Defendants’ 

Case 3:07-md-01826-WHA Document 518 Filed 07/22/08 Page 2 of 3
COOLEY GODWARD 

KRONISH LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING CERTAIN 

PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLASS CERT. FILINGS

M:07-CV-01826-WHA 

Opposition to Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs’ and Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motions for Class 

Certification – portions of paragraphs 12 (lines 4-10), 15 (lines 2-7), 17 (lines 7-10), and 19 (lines 

5-9), and all of paragraphs 26-28, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36-38, 40-43, 46, and 48, and diagrams 1-6. 

(G) (Docket Entry # 376) Declaration of Matthew Skynner in Support of Defendants’ 

Oppositions to Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs’ and Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motions for Class 

Certification (redactions of customer and product names only) – paragraphs, 40, 41, and 46. 

(H) (Docket Entry # 403) Reply Memorandum in Support of Indirect Purchaser 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification – footnote 7 (parenthetical on lines 13-15) 

(I) (Docket Entry # 407) Declaration of Kevin J. Barry in Support of Direct Purchaser 

Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Class Certification – exhibit 5 (portions of 

paragraphs 12 (lines 4-10), 15 (lines 2-7), 17 (lines 7-10), and 19 (lines 5-9), and all of paragraphs 

26-28, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36-38, 40-43, 46, and 48; and diagrams 1-6), exhibit 6, exhibits 9-18 

(customer and product names only), and exhibits 19-30. 

(J) (Docket Entry # 413) Supplemental Declaration of Michael P. Lehmann in 

Support of Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification – exhibits 36 and 37. 

(K) (Exhibit A to Docket Entry # 420) Reply Report of David J. Teece – paragraph 31, 

lines 9-10 (four dollar figures), and exhibits 2a-2d, 3a-3d, 4a-4d, 5a-5d, and 6a-6b. 

(L) (Docket Entry # 427) Corrected Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Janet Netz in Support 

of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification – paragraphs 30 (lines 7-15) and 67 (lines 6, 7, 9, and 

10), and footnotes 43 (lines 1-8 and any customer names), 45 (customer names only), 46 

(customer names only), 47 (customer names only), 92 (line 1), 93 (lines 1-2), and 95 (lines 1-5 of 

the first bullet point, line 1 of the third bullet point, lines 1-3 of the fourth bullet point, and any 

customer names). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________, 2008 _______________________________ 

 The Honorable William Alsup 

 United States District Court Judge 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

July 22

Case 3:07-md-01826-WHA Document 518 Filed 07/22/08 Page 3 of 3