Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_00-md-01369/USCOURTS-cand-3_00-md-01369-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

354551.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE 

MANAGEMENT, C-MDL-00-1369 (MHP) 

NY1:\1336518\0102\SN9$0102!.DOC\19401.0003

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE NAPSTER, INC. COPYRIGHT 

LITIGATION

CASE NO. C-MDL-00-1369 MHP 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT ISSUES 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 

UMG RECORDINGS, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

HUMMER WINBLAD VENTURE 

PARTNERS, et al., 

Defendants.

No. C 04-1166 MHP 

UMG RECORDINGS, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BERTELSMANN AG, et al., 

Defendants.

No. C 04-1351 MHP

Case M:00-cv-01369-MHP Document 666 Filed 07/05/2005 Page 1 of 5 Case 3:00-md-01369-MHP Document 667 Filed 07/07/05 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

354551.01 - 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE 

MANAGEMENT, C-MDL-00-1369 (MHP) 

LEIBER, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BERTELSMANN AG, et al., 

Defendants.

No. C 04-1671 MHP

CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BERTELSMANN AG, et al., 

Defendants.

No. C 04-2121 MHP

WHEREAS, at the November 22, 2004 status conference, the Court set a schedule 

for pretrial fact discovery, as well as expert proffers and dispositive motions relating to the same; 

and

WHEREAS, the Court, at the April 11, 2005 hearing on defendants’ summary 

judgment motion, directed the parties to meet and confer regarding the case management 

schedule following the release of the Court’s memorandum and order on that motion; and 

WHEREAS, the Court issued its memorandum and order on defendants’ motion 

on June 1, and the parties have met and conferred and have agreed that the case management 

schedule should be modified as provided herein; 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The case management schedule adopted at the November 22, 2004 status 

conference shall be modified as follows: 

 a. The date for completion of such fact discovery as the Court 

ordered, at the November 22, 2004 status conference, to be completed by October 7, 2005 shall 

be changed to March 31, 2006. The Parties are continuing to discuss the scope of discovery that 

Case M:00-cv-01369-MHP Document 666 Filed 07/05/2005 Page 2 of 5 Case 3:00-md-01369-MHP Document 667 Filed 07/07/05 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

354551.01 - 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE 

MANAGEMENT, C-MDL-00-1369 (MHP) 

is to be completed after March 31, 2006 (the “deferred discovery”), and expect to present a more 

comprehensive definition at or in advance of the July 11 Case Management Conference; 

 b. The date for all parties to file statements regarding expert proffers 

in accordance with the Court’s direction at the November 22, 2004 status conference shall be 

changed from October 17, 2005 to April 10, 2006. The parties shall appear for a status 

conference regarding the expert proffers on April 17, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., or at such other date and 

time as set by the Court. 

 c. The last day for parties to file dispositive motions shall be extended 

from November 30, 2005, to May 31, 2006. Nothing herein shall preclude any party from filing 

prior to May 31, 2006 any dispositive motion that it believes is supported by the facts and the 

law, nothing herein shall preclude any party from opposing any such motion on any ground that it 

believes is supported by the facts and the law, and nothing herein shall preclude any party from 

filing dispositive motions related to deferred discovery at a date after the completion of all 

discovery.

 2. The parties shall continue to meet and confer on a complete case management 

schedule setting forth further deadlines for discovery, expert disclosures, and the like, and expect 

to submit an agreed-upon schedule or proposals to the Court in advance of or at the July 11 Case 

Management Conference. 

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case M:00-cv-01369-MHP Document 666 Filed 07/05/2005 Page 3 of 5 Case 3:00-md-01369-MHP Document 667 Filed 07/07/05 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

354551.01 - 3 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE 

MANAGEMENT, C-MDL-00-1369 (MHP) 

DATED: July 5, 2005 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

By: /s/ ________

 GLENN D. POMERANTZ 

Attorneys for UMG Plaintiffs 

DATED: July 5, 2005 FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER & 

JACOBSON LLP 

By: /s/ _____________

 PETER L. SIMMONS 

Attorneys for EMI Plaintiffs 

DATED: July 5, 2005 PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & 

GARRISON LLP 

By: /s/ ____________

 CAREY R. RAMOS 

Attorneys for LEIBER Plaintiffs 

DATED: July 5, 2005 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ _____________

 MICHAEL H. PAGE 

Attorneys for HUMMER WINBLAD 

Defendants

DATED: July 5, 2005 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

By: /s/ _____________

 KENNETH L. STEINTHAL 

Attorneys for BERTELSMANN Defendants 

ORDER

 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 __________________________________ 

 HON. MARILYN HALL PATEL 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case M:00-cv-01369-MHP Document 666 Filed 07/05/2005 Page 4 of 5

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

July 6, 2005

Case 3:00-md-01369-MHP Document 667 Filed 07/07/05 Page 4 of 5
354551.01

Case M:00-cv-01369-MHP Document 666 Filed 07/05/2005 Page 5 of 5 Case 3:00-md-01369-MHP Document 667 Filed 07/07/05 Page 5 of 5