Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01529/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01529-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE FEDERICO VASQUEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1529 DAD P

vs.

M. TAYLOR, et al., ORDER AND

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed June 29, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis

affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days. In addition, plaintiff’s complaint

was dismissed and he was granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 

Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The thirty day period has now

expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to

randomly assign this action to a District Judge.

Also, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice.

/////

Case 2:10-cv-01529-MCE -DAD Document 5 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 10, 2010.

DAD:4

vasq1529.fifp.fta

Case 2:10-cv-01529-MCE -DAD Document 5 Filed 08/10/10 Page 2 of 2