Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05490/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05490-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY SAMUEL CATO,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

TERHUNE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:03-cv-05490-AWI-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, NUNC PRO TUNC TO JULY 2,

2007

(Doc. 169)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OR THIS ACTION

WILL BE DISMISSED

Plaintiff Anthony Samuel Cato (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 13, 2007, defendants filed

a motion seeking an extension of time up to and including July 2, 2007, within which to file a motion

for summary judgment, and on July 2, 2007, defendants filed their motion.

Accordingly, 

1. Defendants’ motion for an extension of time to file a motion for summary judgment

is HEREBY GRANTED, nunc pro tunc to July 2, 2007; 

2. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non opposition to defendants’

motion within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order; and

///

///

Case 1:03-cv-05490-AWI-GSA Document 172 Filed 07/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. If plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a statement of non opposition in compliance

with this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey a

court order and failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 6, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05490-AWI-GSA Document 172 Filed 07/06/07 Page 2 of 2