Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01495/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01495-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAKEITH L. MCCOY,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. GARIKAPARTHI et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:13-cv-01495-DAD-BAM

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

(Doc. Nos. 39, 47)

Plaintiff LaKeith L. McCoy is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 

this civil rights action filed on September 16, 2013. (Doc. Nos. 1, 5.) On February 1, 2017, the 

assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendants’ 

motion to dismiss be denied. (Doc. No. 47.) Those findings and recommendations were served 

on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen 

days after service of the findings and recommendations. (Id. at 10.) No objections have been 

filed and the time provided for doing so has now passed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this court has conducted a 

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

/////

Case 1:13-cv-01495-DAD-BAM Document 48 Filed 03/03/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly,

1. The February 1, 2017 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 47) are adopted in 

full;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 39) is denied; and

3. This action is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings 

consistent with this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 2, 2017 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01495-DAD-BAM Document 48 Filed 03/03/17 Page 2 of 2