Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04155/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04155-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 368
Nature of Suit: Asbestos Personal Injury - Prod.liab.
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C:\Documents and Settings\Workstation\Local Settings\Temp\notesF8C1A4\USDC-STIP-ORD Remand-VIAD-DIAL.wpd 1

STIPULATION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE TO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO c-7-4155 CW

ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESQ., S.B. #73685

DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., S.B. #154436

RICHARD M. GRANT, ESQ., SB #55677

BRAYTON ̃PURCELL LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

222 Rush Landing Road

P.O. Box 6169

Novato, California 94948-6169

(415) 898-1555

(415) 898-1247 Fax

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT GARRITANO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) As

Reflected on Exhibits B, B-1,C, H, I; and

DOES 1-8500,

Defendants

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-07-4155 CW (Oakland)

STIPULATION AND ORDER

REMANDING CASE TO SUPERIOR

COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

SAN FRANCISCO

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff ROBERT GARRITANO

and defendant VIAD CORP, and THE DIAL CORPORATION, individually and as alleged

successors-in-interest to Griscom-Russell Company (hereinafter “VIAD”), by and through their

respective counsel, as follows:

1. This asbestos personal injury action was originally filed in Superior Court of

California, County of San Francisco (the "State Court"), Case Nos. CGC-06-452792 (the "State

Action"), in which the plaintiff alleged various claims against defendant VIAD, amongst others.

2. Defendant VIAD filed its Notice of Removal of the State Action on August 13, 2007

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1442(a)(1).

Case 4:07-cv-04155-CW Document 11 Filed 09/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C:\Documents and Settings\Workstation\Local Settings\Temp\notesF8C1A4\USDC-STIP-ORD Remand-VIAD-DIAL.wpd 2

STIPULATION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE TO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO c-7-4155 CW

3. After mutual review, discussion and analysis of this action, the parties agree that

remand to the State Court is appropriate at this time.

4. This Court may immediately remand this matter to the California Superior Court,

County of San Francisco.

 Dated: _____________________ CHARTER DAVIS, LLP

By: 

Whitney A. Davis

Attorneys for Defendant 

VIAD Corp, and THE DIAL CORPORATION,

individually and as alleged successor-in-interest

to Griscom-Russell Company

 Dated: _____________________ BRAYTON ̃PURCELL LLP

By: 

Richard M. Grant

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

This case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of San

Francisco, Case. No. CGC 06-452792. The Clerk shall send a certified copy of this Order to the

Clerk of the Court for the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco and that Court

may thereupon proceed with the case.

 9/5/07 

Dated: ___________________________ ______________________________

 CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:07-cv-04155-CW Document 11 Filed 09/05/07 Page 2 of 2