Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00546/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00546-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:402 Social Security Benefits

---

Stip. & Order for Remand; 1:19-cv-00546-BAM 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

CAROL S. CLARK, MOBN 42670

Special Assistant United States Attorney

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8975

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: Carol.S.Clark@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

FIDEL NAVARRETE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ANDREW SAUL, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:19-cv-00546-BAM

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

REMAND 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, Fidel Navarrete

(Plaintiff) and Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner 

or Defendant), through their respective counsel of record, that this action be 

remanded for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social 

Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), sentence four. 

On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an administrative

law judge (ALJ), directing the ALJ to reevaluate the medical opinion evidence, 

Case 1:19-cv-00546-BAM Document 20 Filed 02/18/20 Page 1 of 3
Stip. & Order for Remand; 1:19-cv-00546-BAM 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

clarify Plaintiff’s education and ability to communicate in English, take action to 

further develop the record if warranted, and issue a new decision. 

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a 

final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final 

decision of the Commissioner.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: February 12, 2020 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

By: /s/ Carol S. Clark 

CAROL S. CLARK

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

By: /s/ Jonathan Pena

JONATHAN PENA

Attorney for Plaintiff (signature authorized 

by email on February 12, 2020)

Case 1:19-cv-00546-BAM Document 20 Filed 02/18/20 Page 2 of 3
Stip. & Order for Remand; 1:19-cv-00546-BAM 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be 

remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action consistent 

with the above stipulation. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a final judgment in favor 

of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 14, 2020 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-00546-BAM Document 20 Filed 02/18/20 Page 3 of 3