Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01992/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01992-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 05:7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act

---

Page 1 of 2   

 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

  THE ZUMWALT 

LAW FIRM, APC 

1600 G STREET 

SUITE 104 

MODESTO, CA 95354 

T: ሺ209ሻ 577‐6100 

F: ሺ209ሻ 577‐1038 

Frank T. Zumwalt, Esq., SBN. 132746 

Graham S. Lopez, Esq., SBN. 236077 

THE ZUMWALT LAW FIRM, APC. 

1600 G Street, Suite 104 

Modesto, California 95354 

Telephone No: (209) 577-6100 

Facsimile No: (209) 577-1038 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

DAVID SHAYNE HEINE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT O F CALIFORNIA 

 

David Shayne Heine, California Veal Tech, 

Inc. a California Corporation 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

Tom Vilsack in His Official Capacity as 

United States Secretary of Agriculture, 

United States Department Of Agriculture, 

United States Department Of Agriculture 

Food Safety and Inspection Service, Yudhbir 

Sharma, DVM, USDA Employee Known 

Only as "Dr. Pannu," USDA Employee 

Known only as "Ken," USDA Employee 

Known only as "Dr. Redding," USDA 

Employee Known Only as "Dr. Henley," Dr. 

Amy Lieder, Penny Patrali and DOES 1 – 

100 inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-01992-AWI-SMS 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THIRD 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

 Plaintiffs, David Shayne Heine and California Veal Tech, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”), and 

Defendants United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and Dr. Inderjeet Pannu, hereby 

stipulate and agree as follows: 

Case 1:12-cv-01992-AWI-SMS Document 35 Filed 12/02/13 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2   

 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

  THE ZUMWALT 

LAW FIRM, APC 

1600 G STREET 

SUITE 104 

MODESTO, CA 95354 

T: ሺ209ሻ 577‐6100 

F: ሺ209ሻ 577‐1038 

 1. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the third, fourth, fifth and sixth 

causes of action alleged in the plaintiffs' second amended complaint ("SAC"). The motion is set 

to be heard on December 9, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom 2. 

 2. The motion to dismiss will be taken off calendar and plaintiffs will file a third 

amended complaint ("TAC") by December 9, 2013. The TAC will not have the third, fourth, 

fifth and sixth causes of action alleged in the SAC. 

 3. The plaintiffs have filed a claim with the defendant USDA for the relief sought in 

the third, fourth, fifth and sixth causes of action alleged in the SAC. If and when the claim is 

rejected, the plaintiffs may seek leave of the Court to file a fourth amended complaint asserting 

additional claims. Defendants reserve all objections to such further amendment and to such 

additional claims, if any. 

 Respectfully submitted: 

Dated: November 27, 2013 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

 United States Attorney 

 /s/ Benjamin E. Hall 

 BENJAMIN E. HALL 

 Assistant U.S. Attorney 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 

 THE ZUMWALT LAW FIRM, LLP 

Dated: November 27, 2013 /s/ Graham Lopez . 

 GRAHAM LOPEZ

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

ORDER

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 12/2/2013 /s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER 

 HON. SANDRA M. SNYDER 

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:12-cv-01992-AWI-SMS Document 35 Filed 12/02/13 Page 2 of 2