Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01107/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01107-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C 12-01107 LB

ORDER

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

RAHILA KHAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

RECONTRUST COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 12-01107 LB

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Re: ECF Nos. 112-130]

On February 23, 2015, the court granted SPS’s motion to dismiss, and granted in part and denied

in part ReconTrust and Bank of America’s motion to dismiss, Ms. Khan’s Second Amended

Complaint. The court dismissed without prejudice Ms. Khan’s fraud claim against SPS and

dismissed with prejudice her fraud claim against ReconTrust. The court ruled that her fraud claim

against Bank of America survived. The court allowed Ms. Khan to file a Third Amended Complaint

by March 9, 2015. 

On March 8, 2015, Ms. Khan attempted to electronically file a Third Amended Complaint. (See

ECF Nos. 112-130.) Rather than filing a single document, she filed numerous exhibit and portions

of her Third Amended Complaint out of order and in nineteen separate entries on the court’s docket. 

This is confusing and does not allow Defendants or the court to put together the Third Amended

Complaint. 

In light of Ms. Khan’s struggles with the court’s ECF system, and to remedy this situation, the

Case 3:12-cv-01107-LB Document 131 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 2
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C 12-01107 LB

ORDER

2

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

court directs Ms. Khan to print out two complete copies of her Third Amended Complaint with its

exhibits, put it in order, and either (1) file one at Intake in the Clerk’s Office on the 16th Floor of the

San Francisco federal courthouse and lodge the other as a chamber’s copy for the court, or (2) mail

both copies, and a copy of this order, to the courthouse so her it can be filed for her. She must do

either of these things by March 20, 2015. The court’s address is Chambers of U.S. Magistrate Judge

Laurel Beeler, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,

California 94102.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2015 _______________________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:12-cv-01107-LB Document 131 Filed 03/09/15 Page 2 of 2