Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05157/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05157-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 12:22 Securities Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. C 06-15157 JF

sf-2210349

DARRYL P. RAINS (State Bar No. 104802)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018

Telephone: (650) 813-5600

Facsimile: (650) 494-0792

Email: DRains@mofo.com

DIANE E. PRITCHARD (State Bar No. 96999)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-2482

Telephone: (415) 268-7000

Facsimile: (415) 268-7522

Email: DPritchard@mofo.com

Attorneys for Defendants

TIMOTHY K. MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM J. TAMBLYN, 

GREGORY M. AVIS, WILLIAM A. HASLER, ANDREI M. 

MANOLIU, and DITECH NETWORKS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DONALD W. NEWMAN, Derivatively on Behalf 

of Nominal Defendant DITECH NETWORKS, 

INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. TIMOTHY K. MONTGOMERY, SERGE 

STEPANOFF, WILLIAM J. TAMBLYN, TONI 

M. BELLIN, ROBERT T. DEVINCENZI, 

GREGORY M. AVIS, WILLIAM A. HASLER 

and ANDREI M. MANOLIU,

Defendants, – and – DITECH NETWORKS, INC., Nominal Defendant.

Case No. C 06-05157 JF

STIPULATION REGARDING 

TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT

**E-filed 10/19/06**

Case 5:06-cv-05157-JF Document 17 Filed 10/19/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. C 06-15157 JF

sf-2210349

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Donald W. Newman, on the one 

hand, and defendants Timothy K. Montgomery, William J. Tamblyn, Gregory M. Avis, 

William A. Hasler, Andrei M. Manoliu, and Ditech Networks, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), 

on the other hand, through their respective counsel herein, that Defendants shall have a 30-day 

extension of time from October 18, 2006, i.e., through and including November 17, 2006, within 

which to respond to the complaint in this action. 

Dated: October 17, 2006 BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & 

BIRKHAEUSER, LLP

ALAN R. PLUTZIK

L. TIMOTHY FISHER

KATHRYN A. SCHOFIELD

 - and - SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP

ERIC L. ZAGAR

SANDRA G. SMITH

By s/ Kathryn A. Schofield

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DONALD W. NEWMAN

Dated: October 17, 2006 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

DARRYL P. RAINS

DIANE E. PRITCHARD

By s/ Diane E. Pritchard

 Diane E. Pritchard

Attorneys for Defendants TIMOTHY K. 

MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM J. TAMBLYN, 

GREGORY M. AVIS, WILLIAM A. 

HASLER, ANDREI M. MANOLIU, and 

DITECH NETWORKS, INC.

Case 5:06-cv-05157-JF Document 17 Filed 10/19/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. C 06-15157 JF

sf-2210349

2

I, Diane E. Pritchard, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation Regarding Time To Respond To Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45, 

X.B., I hereby attest that Kathryn A. Schofield, attorney for Plaintiff, Donald W. Newman, has 

concurred in this filing.

Dated: October 17, 2006 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

DARRYL P. RAINS

DIANE E. PRITCHARD

By s/ Diane E. Pritchard

 Diane E. Pritchard

Attorneys for Defendants TIMOTHY K. 

MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM J. TAMBLYN, 

GREGORY M. AVIS, WILLIAM A. 

HASLER, ANDREI M. MANOLIU, and 

DITECH NETWORKS, INC. PURSUANT TO STIPULATON, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October ___, 2006. ______________________________________ The Honorable Jeremy Fogel

United States District Judge

19

Case 5:06-cv-05157-JF Document 17 Filed 10/19/06 Page 3 of 3