Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04196/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04196-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

13-CV-04196-CRB

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CMC CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Emilie E. de la Motte (SBN: 233557)

edelamotte@meyersnave.com

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON

555 12th Street, Suite 1500

Oakland, California 94607

Telephone: (510) 808-2000

Facsimile: (510) 444-1108

Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant/CrossClaimant CITY OF OAKLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DESSIE R. NELSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE HARTFORD, and DOES 1 through 10, 

Inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-CV-04196-CRB

STIPULATION REQUESTING 

CONTINUANCE OF CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; 

ORDER 

Trial Date: None Set

HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

JULIANA JAMES, as Administrator of the 

Estate of Clarence James, CITY OF 

OAKLAND, and ROES 1 through 50, 

Inclusive,

Third-Party Defendants.

CITY OF OAKLAND,

Cross-Claimant,

v.

JULIANA JAMES, as Administrator of the

Estate of Clarence James, and MOES 1 

through 10, Inclusive,

Cross-Defendants.

Case 3:13-cv-04196-CRB Document 89 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 13-CV-04196-CRB

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CMC CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

COMES NOW Plaintiff Dessie Nelson, Defendant and Third-Party Complainant Hartford 

Life Insurance Company (erroneously sued as “The Hartford”), Third-Party Defendant and CrossClaimant City of Oakland, and Third-Party Defendant and Cross-Defendant Juliana James 

(collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, and respectfully 

ask the Court to continue the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for April 3, 

2015, for another forty-five (45) days. The Parties believe that good cause permits the Court to 

continue the conference. The Parties have informally agreed to settle all claims and cross-claims 

alleged in this lawsuit. The terms of the agreements have already been agreed upon by the Parties 

and their counsel. The Parties need, however, additional time to: 1) execute the final settlement 

agreement documents; 2) obtain approval from City of Oakland’s City Council; and 3) effectuate 

the disbursement of settlement moneys. The Parties believe they can resolve these pending issues 

within 60 days and hope to submit a stipulation for dismissal within that time period. A case 

management conference at this time would prove unhelpful for both the Parties and the Court in 

facilitating the resolution of this proceeding. Accordingly, the parties ask the Court to order that 

the April 3 conference be continued to May 22, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 19, 2015

THE UKOHA-AJIKE LAW GROUP PC

By: /s/ Endy Ukoha-Ajike

ENDY UKOHA-AJIKE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dessie R. Nelson 

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

By: /s/ James A. Hazlehurst

MARTIN E. ROSEN

JAMES A. HAZLEHURST

Attorneys for Defendant Hartford Life 

Insurance Company 

MOORE & MOORE

By: /s/ Howard Moore, Jr.

HOWARD MOORE, JR. 

Attorney for Third Party Defendant

Juliana James 

MEYERS NAVE APLC

By: /s/ Emilie de la Motte

EMILIE E. DE LA MOTTE

Attorneys for Third Party Defendant 

City of Oakland

Case 3:13-cv-04196-CRB Document 89 Filed 03/23/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 13-CV-04196-CRB

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CMC CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

ORDER

Now before the Court is the Parties request to continue the Case Management Conference 

for forty-five (45) days. The parties submitted a joint stipulation, appearing above, which showed 

good cause exists to continue the case management conference, so that the Parties may finalize the 

terms of their respective settlement agreements. Having read and considered the arguments 

submitted by the Parties, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The April 3, 2015 Case Management Conference is hereby CONTINUED to May 22, 2015 

at 8:30 a.m. in Department 6. All associated deadlines, including the submittal of a joint case 

management conference, shall accord with the new conference date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 20, 2015 By:

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer

Senior District Court Judge

2415083.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:13-cv-04196-CRB Document 89 Filed 03/23/15 Page 3 of 3