Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00037/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00037-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SOMTAI TROY CHAROENSAK, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

APPLE COMPUTER, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 05-0037 JW (PVT)

ORDER RE PARTIES’ PROPOSED

FORM OF PROTECTIVE ORDER

On December 11, 2006, the parties filed a proposed form of protective order regarding

confidential information.1 Based on the proposed form submitted, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than January 3, 2006, the parties shall file a revised

form of protective order that makes the following changes:

1. Describes the information that may be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” as “extremely sensitive CONFIDENTIAL information

whose disclosure to another party or nonparty would create a substantial risk of

serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive means”;

2. Expressly states that documents designated “CONFIDENTIAL” may be disclosed to

the parties;

3. Replaces the words “filed under seal” on page 5, line 12, with the words “submitted

to the court with a request to file under seal”; and

Case 4:05-cv-00037-YGR Document 88 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

4. Replaces the wording in 11.(b) at page 7, lines 12-19, with: “The Clerk of the Court

shall maintain under seal any documents that have been sealed by the court, subject to

Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) and any further order of the court.”

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending entry of the final form of protective order, the

provisions of the parties’ proposed form of protective order, as modified herein, shall govern the

handling of confidential information exchanged or produced in connection with this action.

Dated: 12/15/06

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 4:05-cv-00037-YGR Document 88 Filed 12/15/06 Page 2 of 2