Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03225/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03225-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES DIPINTO

No. 2:09-cv-03225-MCE-EFB

Plaintiff,

v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

AMERICAN BROKERS CONDUIT, a

division of American Home

Mortgage dba ATM CORPORATION;

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

as Trustee for the holders of

Bear Stearns Asset Backed

Securities I Trust 2006-AC3,

Asset-Backed certificates,

Series 2006-AC3, its assignees

and/or successors; NICK

PERJANIK; JOHN J. GIZA; ROBERT

BEST APPRAISALS; ROBERT T.

BEST; and DOES 1-20, 

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

This action arises out of a mortgage loan transaction in

which Plaintiff James DiPinto (“Plaintiff”) refinanced his home

in 2006. Plaintiff now alleges several violations of state and

federal law in connection with his loan. 

///

Case 2:09-cv-03225-MCE -KJN Document 18 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Because oral argument will not be of material assistance, 1

the Court orders this matter submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal.

Local Rule 230(g). 

2

Presently before the Court is a Motion by Defendant U.S. Bank

National Association solely as trustee for the holders of Bear

Stearns Asset Back Securities I Trust 2006-AC3, Asset-Backed

Certificates, Series 2006-AC3 (“Defendant”) to Dismiss

Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

12(b)(6). Defendant so moves on the grounds that it was not 1

involved with the origination of Plaintiff’s loan. Plaintiff has

failed to timely file an opposition to Defendant’s Motion. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), opposition to a motion must

be filed not less than fourteen (14) days prior to the date of

the hearing. The date of the hearing was set for January 28,

2010. Fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing was January 14,

2010. No opposition was filed as required. 

In light of the fact that no opposition was filed by

Plaintiff, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 9) is

GRANTED with leave to amend. 

As a result of the failure to respond to this Motion, within

ten (10) days from the date this order is electronically filed,

Plaintiff’s counsel shall either (1) personally pay sanctions in

the amount of $250.00 to the Clerk of the Court or (2) show

good cause for the failure to comply with Local Rule 230 (c).

///

///

///

Case 2:09-cv-03225-MCE -KJN Document 18 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Plaintiff may file an amended complaint not later than

twenty (20) days after the date this Memorandum and Order is

filed electronically. If no amended complaint is filed within

said twenty (20)-day period, without further notice, Plaintiff’s

claims will be dismissed without leave to amend.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2010

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:09-cv-03225-MCE -KJN Document 18 Filed 02/01/10 Page 3 of 3