Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05878/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05878-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 08:1252(a)(2) Injunction for Deportation

---

JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHSUSA:763990196.1

ROBERT P. VARIAN (SBN 107459)

CHARLES J. HA (pro hac vice)

DAVID KEENAN (pro hac vice)

JUDY KWAN (SBN 273930)

ALEXIS YEE-GARCIA (SBN 277204)

CHRISTOPHER J. SIEBENS (pro hac vice)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

The Orrick Building

405 Howard Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2669

Telephone: (415) 773-5700

Facsimile: (415) 773-5759

Email: rvarian@orrick.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

[Additional Counsel appear on signature page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AUDLEY BARRINGTON LYON, JR., et. al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

Case No.: 13-cv-05878 EMC

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING 

SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS FOR

BRIEFING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND 

CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

CLASS ACTION

Case 3:13-cv-05878-EMC Document 110 Filed 11/25/15 Page 1 of 6
1 JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHSUSA:763801914.1

The parties to this action hereby file this Joint Stipulation for an order to set the briefing 

schedule and to seek expanded page limits for the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. 

The parties seek leave of court to file expanded briefs in this matter for the following reasons:

• The case is factually complex. The claims are brought on behalf of a plaintiff class of 

several hundred people who are housed at four separate facilities. The claims relate to 

telephone access provided to immigration detainees at those facilities, which are served by 

three different telephone companies. In addition, the operative facts have changed over the 

course of litigation.

• The case is legally complex. Plaintiffs are challenging the adequacy of telephone access 

provided by Defendants under statutory and constitutional provisions that have not 

previously been applied to similar facts. 

• The parties will seek partial summary judgment based on cross motions and will present 

four rather than six briefs to the court. Because the Defendants’ opening motion and 

opposition and Plaintiffs’ opposition and reply, respectively, will be combined, and 

because of the complex facts and law presented, the parties’ ability to present the issues 

thoroughly to the Court would be constrained if limited to the typical page limitations. 

Accordingly, the Parties propose the following briefing schedule and page limits: 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 40 pages December 16, 2015

Defendants’ Opposition and Cross Motion for Summary 

Judgment

50 pages January 5, 2016

Plaintiffs’ Opposition and Reply 30 pages January 21, 2016

Defendants’ Reply 20 pages January 28, 2016

Court Hearing on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment February 11, 2016

Case 3:13-cv-05878-EMC Document 110 Filed 11/25/15 Page 2 of 6
2 JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHSUSA:763990196.1

Dated: November 25, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

By: /s/ Robert P. Varian

ROBERT P. VARIAN (SBN 107459)

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION

FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA

JULIA HARUMI MASS (SBN 189649)

MICHAEL T. RISHER (SBN 191627)

ANGELICA SALCEDA (SBN 296152)

39 Drumm Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 621-2493

Facsimile: (415) 255-8437

Email: jmass@aclunc.org

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 

NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT

CARL TAKEI (SBN 256229)

915 15th Street N.W., 7th Floor

Washington, DC 20005

Telephone: (202) 393-4930

Facsimile: (202) 393-4931

Email: ctakei@aclu.org

VAN DER HOUT, BRIGAGLIANO, & 

NIGHTINGALE, LLP

MEGAN SALLOMI (SBN 300580)

180 Sutter Street, Suite 500

San Francisco, CA 94104

Main Line: (415) 981-3000 

Direct Line: (415) 821-8827

Email: Msal@vblaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 3:13-cv-05878-EMC Document 110 Filed 11/25/15 Page 3 of 6
3 JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHSUSA:763990196.1

Dated: November 25, 2015 DISTRICT COURT SECTION

OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION 

CIVIL DIVISION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

BENJAMIN C. MIZER

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

WILLIAM C. PEACHEY

Director

ELIZABETH J. STEVENS

Assistant Director

By: /s/ Katherine J. Shinners

KATHERINE J. SHINNERS

BRIAN C. WARD

JENNIFER A. BOWEN

Trial Attorneys

P.O Box 868, Ben Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044

Telephone: (202) 598-8259

Facsimile: (202) 305-7000

Email: Katherine.J.Shinners@usdoj.gov

Attorneys For Defendants

Case 3:13-cv-05878-EMC Document 110 Filed 11/25/15 Page 4 of 6
4 JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHSUSA:763990196.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: ________________ ____________________________________

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Court Judge

11/25/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-05878-EMC Document 110 Filed 11/25/15 Page 5 of 6
5 JOINT STIPULATION

CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHSUSA:763990196.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 25, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS FOR BRIEFING ON 

CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER was served with 

the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which provided an electronic notice and 

electronic link of the same to all attorneys of record through the Court’s CM/ECF system.

Dated: November 25, 2015 By: /s/ Robert P. Varian

 ROBERT P. VARIAN

Case 3:13-cv-05878-EMC Document 110 Filed 11/25/15 Page 6 of 6