Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-329/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL No. 1917 

Case No. C-07-5944-SC 

ORDER REGARDING SUBMISSIONS 

IN SUPPORT OF DISPOSITIVE 

MOTIONS 

This Order Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS 

 In the coming weeks, the parties will complete briefing on 

dispositive motions, motions in limine, and other non-dispositive 

motions. The Court issues this order to simplify and streamline 

the parties' submissions and the Court's consideration of those 

submissions. 

 First, pursuant to the undersigned's Civil Standing Order and 

Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7), the parties are required to file paper 

copies of documents that are electronically filed, and are required 

to submit exhibits of greater than two inches in tabbed three ring 

binders. To ease administrative burdens and the limits on space, 

the Court instead ORDERS that the following rules shall govern 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3398 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 3
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

courtesy copies for the remaining dispositive motion filings, 

Daubert motions, and other motions in limine. 

Paper courtesy copies no longer need to be submitted except for 

the following items: 

 Briefs (both unredacted and redacted copies), 

 full or excerpted expert reports (in three ring binders if 

necessary), and 

 administrative motions for leave to file under seal and 

supporting declarations. 

The parties may submit any additional materials (including the 

exhibits parties seek to have filed under seal and all other 

exhibits or declarations) in electronic format whether on a CD or 

flash drive. 

 Second, in conjunction with the parties' submission of replies 

in support of dispositive motions on January 26, the Court ORDERS 

the parties to confer and file a single spreadsheet or other 

document showing, in tabular format, the dispositive motions that 

are still active and against what parties they remain active. This 

document will help the Court determine which motions remain active 

in light of the numerous recent settlements and other dismissals. 

The parties need not follow this format precisely, but to provide 

an example of the information the Court would like the parties to 

provide, here is a suggestion: 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3398 Filed 01/16/15 Page 2 of 3
3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

ECF 

No. 

Movant Motion Adverse Parties Opp'n 

ECF 

No. 

Reply 

ECF 

No. 

2976 Hitachi 

Parties 

(joinder 

by 

Toshiba, 

ECF No. 

3010) 

Motion for 

Summary 

Judgment Based 

on Lack of 

Evidence of 

Participation 

in Alleged 

Conspiracy 

IPPs, 

Electrograph, 

Circuit City, 

Best Buy, Target, 

Sears, Interbond, 

Office Depot, 

CompuCom, Costco, 

P.C. Richard & 

Son, Schultze, 

and Tech Data 

3274 X 

If, because of a settlement, a motion is no longer active against 

one of the initially adverse parties, the parties shall indicate 

that using strikethrough, footnote, or some other means. If an 

entire motion is no longer necessary the parties shall indicate 

that using similar means. This document should be submitted both 

on ECF and in electronic format to the Court's proposed order email 

inbox, SCpo@cand.uscourts.gov. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Dated: January 16, 2015 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 3398 Filed 01/16/15 Page 3 of 3