Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01013/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01013-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JKM

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Manuel Raul Reyo Pena Garcia Montero,

Petitioner,

vs.

Senator McCain, et al., 

Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-1013-PHX-DGC (JJM)

ORDER

Petitioner Manuel Raul Reyo Pena Garcia Montero, who is confined in the Federal

Correctional Institution Satellite Camp in Terre Haute, Indiana, has filed a pro se Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has also filed a Request to

Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #3), but his Request is not certified as required by Rule

3.5(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Ordinarily the Court would grant Petitioner

leave to file a corrected application to proceed in forma pauperis, but that would be futile in

this case because the underlying Petition has no arguable basis in law or in fact.

Because Petitioner’s claims for relief defy description, they are set forth below

verbatim:

Ya, /SIMPLE CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AFFECTING THE

PRESIDENT ILEGAL AUTORITY EVEN MIMI PEARL FROM THE

O’PRY LAND TNT kAN kAN ANSWER WITH OUT HANk’S WILLIAMS

000000000000

000000

Case 2:08-cv-01013-DGC--JR Document 4 Filed 07/02/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Ground 1: /John Adams Damn hell buggus ‘CONGRESSIONAL WRIT’s OF

ELECTION 1823-24 THAT GOT SEXY JOHN Q.ADAMS TO THE

MISSSISSSIPPPI HOUSE ‘YAZOO,

Supporting Facts: ‘PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT IN AMERICA’s

‘ARE ELECTED BY CHUSEN ELECTOR /Not College ‘Pursuant to Article

II’

00000

Ground 2: The Highest Courthouse Ruling 2000 /Case 00-949

Supporting Facts: Constitutional Challenge by Plaintiff Say ‘June 2000’

‘APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI’s See Responser’s

CRIMINAL CONSTITUTIONAL INJUCTION’s /Art II.

00

Petition at 3-4. A review of the online PACER U.S. Party/Case Index confirms that

Petitioner has filed numerous similar actions against the President and former President of

the United States in federal district courts throughout the country.

“Whenever a § 2241 habeas petitioner seeks to challenge his present physical custody

within the United States, he should name his warden as respondent and file the petition in the

district of confinement.” Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 447 (2004). Petitioner is

incarcerated in the Federal Correctional Institution Satellite Camp in Terre Haute, Indiana.

Accordingly, this Court does not have jurisdiction over Petitioner’s custodian. See id. at 443

(habeas corpus jurisdiction lies only in the district of confinement).

Under the Federal Courts Improvement Act, if a “court finds that there is a want of

jurisdiction, the court shall, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer such action . . . to any

other such court in which the action . . . could have been brought at the time it was filed.”

28 U.S.C. § 1631; Miller v. Hambrick, 905 F.2d 259, 262 (9th Cir. 1990). This action could

have been brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

where Petitioner’s immediate custodian resides. The Court finds that a transfer to the

Southern District of Indiana is not in the interest of justice, however, because the underlying

action has no arguable basis in law or in fact. 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #3)

is denied.

Case 2:08-cv-01013-DGC--JR Document 4 Filed 07/02/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition and this action are dismissed for lack

of jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 1st day of July, 2008.

Case 2:08-cv-01013-DGC--JR Document 4 Filed 07/02/08 Page 3 of 3