Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01707/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01707-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Pamela D. April, a single woman,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

U. S. Airways, Inc., a Delaware

corporation,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-1707-PHX-LOA

ORDER

Over this past weekend after learning that Plaintiff filed a notice to appeal in

this action, the Court read the docketed order granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment. (Doc. 79) The Court was shocked to see that as a result of a chamber’s clerical

error, a rough draft order, replete with formatting and typographical errors, misspellings and

substandard grammatical usage, was filed as the public document in this case instead of the

Court’s intended final version. The order granting summary judgment, doc. 79, was an

unedited, rough draft and was not the intended final order for docketing. While the substance

of the rough draft order’s conclusion, citations and rational are the same as, and consistent

with, the intended final order, the public rough draft order does not meet this Magistrate

Judge’s and District Court’s high standard of excellence and writing.

On the Court’s own motion,

IT IS ORDERED that due to a chamber’s clerical error, the Court’s order,

doc. 79, which grants Defendant U.S. Airways, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, doc.

Case 2:09-cv-01707-LOA Document 85 Filed 02/07/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

71, shall be amended and filed under separate docket entry.

Dated this 7th day of February, 2011.

Case 2:09-cv-01707-LOA Document 85 Filed 02/07/11 Page 2 of 2