Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00205/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00205-69/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY LOUIS LAMON,

Plaintiff,

v.

DERRAL ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:09-cv-00205-LJO-JLT PC

ORDER DENYING AND RESERVING 

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSIONS 

OF TIME 

(Doc. 306)

This action is scheduled to start trial on March 8, 2016. On January 5, 2016, Plaintiff filed 

a motion1seeking a thirty-day extension of time to file objections to the order denying his motion 

for attendance of incarcerated witnesses (Doc. 301), the pretrial order (Doc. 302), and the minute 

order which changed the telephone number to be called for the telephonic trial confirmation 

hearing (Doc. 303). 

Though Plaintiff details a number of incidents involving prison personnel and explains

about his inability to access his legal property, neither provides good cause to grant an extension 

of time for him to file objections to the order denying his motion for attendance of incarcerated 

witnesses (Doc. 301), or the minute order which merely changed the telephone number to be 

called for the telephonic trial confirmation hearing (Doc. 303). Neither stated a time for filing of 

 

1

Plaintiff also seeks a “protective order” in this motion regarding his treatment by prison staff and access to his legal 

property. Those issues are addressed by separate order.

Case 1:09-cv-00205-JLT Document 310 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

objections and his remedy, if any, is in an appeal from the final judgment.

Finally, the issue of an extension of time for Plaintiff to file objections to the Pretrial 

Order (Doc. 302) will be discussed at the telephonic trial confirmation hearing and ruling thereon 

is reserved.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED, that as to the extensions of time Plaintiff seeks 

in his motion, filed on January 5, 2016 (Doc. 306):

1. Plaintiff's motion for a thirty day extension of time to file objections to the order 

denying his motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses and to the minute 

order which changed the telephone number to be utilized for the telephonic trial 

confirmation hearing, is DENIED; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file objections to the pretrial order is 

RESERVED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 19, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00205-JLT Document 310 Filed 01/19/16 Page 2 of 2