Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-03-03690/USCOURTS-ca8-03-03690-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3690

___________

Robin C. McDermott, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Thomas Dean Royal, In their individual *

and official capacities as police officers *

for the City of Springfield; Darren *

Whisnant, In their individual and *

official capacities as police officers for *

the City of Springfield; Doug Wilson, *

In their individual and official *

capacities as police officers for the City * 

of Springfield; Brian Phillips, In their *

individual and official capacities as *

police officers for the City of Spring- *

field; John A. Smith, In their * Appeal from the United States

individual and official capacities as * District Court for the

police officers for the City of * Western District of Missouri.

Springfield; Mike Wray, In their *

individual and official capacities as * [UNPUBLISHED]

police officers for the City of Spring- *

field; Lynn Rowe, In his individual *

capacity as Chief of Police for the City *

of Springfield; Ron Dirickson, In his *

individual capacity as Assistant City *

Attorney; City of Springfield, A *

municipal corporation of the State of *

Missouri, *

*

Defendants-Appellees. *

Appellate Case: 03-3690 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/27/2004 Entry ID: 1792473 
1

The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

-2-

___________

Submitted: July 8, 2004

Filed: July 27, 2004

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LAY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Robin McDermott appeals pro se from a final order entered in the United States

District Court for the Western District of Missouri1

 granting the Defendants’ motion

for summary judgment. In her complaint, McDermott alleged that she was denied the

rights secured to her by the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United

States Constitution by virtue of the Defendants’ actions in connection with her arrest

and subsequent prosecution on charges of obstructing a search and assault of an

officer. She asserted a cause of action under § 1983, as well as various pendent state

law claims. Having carefully reviewed the record and the applicable legal authorities,

we find no error in the district court’s disposition of this matter. Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47(B).

______________________________

Appellate Case: 03-3690 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/27/2004 Entry ID: 1792473