Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-05776/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-05776-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY FOSTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

SCHINDLER ELEVATOR 

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:19-cv-05776-WHO 

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO 

ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR 

COURT

Re: Dkt. No. 16

Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation removed this case to federal court on September 

13, 2019 and filed a motion to dismiss on September 20. Dkt. Nos. 1, 7. Plaintiff Jeffrey Foster 

then filed a first amended complaint accompanied by a motion to remand the case back to state 

court. Dkt. Nos. 15, 16. The first amended complaint now includes only a state law wage 

statement claim and derivative penalties claim. On October 18, 2019 Schindler gave notice that it 

does not oppose the motion to remand. Dkt. No. 19. 

Given the parties’ agreement that state court is the appropriate place to resolve their 

dispute, the motion to remand is GRANTED. This case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for 

the State of California, County of Alameda. The November 13, 2019 hearing on the motion is 

VACATED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

Case 3:19-cv-05776-WHO Document 21 Filed 10/31/19 Page 1 of 1