Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05038/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05038-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

Case No. 13-cv-05038 NC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENPLAS DISPLAY DEVICE 

CORPORATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR 

COMPANY, LTD.,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-05038 NC 

NOTICE TO PARTIES RE: 

CONVERTING SSC'S OPPOSITION 

TO INVALIDITY OF '209 PATENT 

INTO SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

MOTION

Re: Dkt. No. 195

In its opposition to Enplas’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the ’209 

patent, SSC argues that there are no genuine disputes of fact. SSC proceeds to argue why 

the Court should sua sponte grant summary judgment against Enplas. Thus, no issues of 

fact appear to be in dispute as to this motion. The Court intends to treat SSC’s opposition 

as a cross-motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f). 

The parties may object by February 2 at 12:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 1, 2016 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-05038-NC Document 310 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 1