Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05776/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05776-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL EARL CROWELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

U.S. BANKCORP, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-05776-WHO 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO 

PROSECUTE

Re: Dkt. No. 10

Defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. Dkt. No. 10. That matter is set 

to be heard on January 27, 2016. Plaintiff’s opposition or response to that motion was due on

January 6, 2016. As of the date of this Order, plaintiff has not filed an opposition or otherwise 

responded to defendant’s motion to dismiss. 

Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for 

failure to prosecute by filing an opposition or other response to the motion to dismiss by

January 27, 2016. If plaintiff does not file such response by that date, this case may be dismissed 

for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(b); Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423 

(9th Cir. 1986) (listing factors relevant to whether to dismiss for lack of prosecution). 

If plaintiff files his opposition by January 27, 2016, defendant’s reply is due by February 3, 

2016. The hearing on the motion to dismiss is reset to February 10, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in 

Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco, California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2016

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-05776-WHO Document 12 Filed 01/14/16 Page 1 of 1