Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02166/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02166-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY BRYAN BROOKS, No. 2:02-cv-2166-MCE-PAN-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

On June 21, 2006, Plaintiff filed a document styled as

Objections to Findings and Recommendations. Review of the

document shows, however, that Plaintiff therein objects to the

magistrate judge’s June 14, 2006 Order Denying Plaintiff’s

request for funds to hire an investigative team. The Court

construes the document filed on June 211, 2006 as a request for

reconsideration of that Order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-

303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 

///

Case 2:02-cv-02166-MCE -EFB Document 92 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous

or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration,

the Order of the magistrate judge filed June 14, 2006, is

affirmed. 

DATED: July 6, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-02166-MCE -EFB Document 92 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2