Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-01263/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-01263-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY, CASE NO 11-CV-1263

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

KESSLER TOPAZ 

MELTZER & CHECK, LLP 

Stacey M. Kaplan (Bar No. 241989) 

One Sansome Street, Suite 1850 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 400-3000 

Facsimile: (415) 400-3001 

-andSean M. Handler (Pro Hac Vice)

Matthew L. Mustokoff (Pro Hac Vice) 

Ryan T. Degnan (Pro Hac Vice) 

Margaret E. Onasch (Pro Hac Vice) 

Daniel C. Mulveny (Pro Hac Vice) 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

Telephone: (610) 667-7706 

Facsimile: (610) 667-7056 

Interim Co-Class Counsel

NIX, PATTERSON & ROACH, LLP 

Jeffrey J. Angelovich (Pro Hac Vice) 

Brad E. Seidel (Pro Hac Vice) 

Andrew G. Pate (Pro Hac Vice) 

Chad E. Ihrig (Pro Hac Vice) 

3600 N. Capital of Texas Highway 

Building B, Suite 350 

Austin, TX 78746 

Telephone: (512) 328-5333 

Facsimile: (512) 328-5335 

MAYER BROWN LLP 

Edward D. Johnson (SBN 189475) 

wjohnson@mayerbrown.com 

Donald M. Falk (SBN150256) 

dfalk@mayerbrown.com 

Eric B. Evans (SBN 232476) 

eevans@mayerbrown.com 

Dominique-Chantale Alepin (SBN 241648) 

dalepin@mayerbrown.com 

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 

Telephone: (650) 331-2000 

Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

RICK WOODS, Individually and on Behalf of 

All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GOOGLE INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 11-cv-1263-EJD 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

EXPERT DISCOVERY 

Case 5:11-cv-01263-EJD Document 219 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 3
 -1-

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY, CASE NO. 11-CV-1263

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Plaintiff Rick Woods and Defendant Google Inc., by and through their counsel of record 

herein, hereby stipulate and agree, subject to Court approval, to the following regarding the scope 

of discovery and testimony relating to experts in this matter: 

WHEREAS, in order to avoid consuming the parties’ and the Court’s time and resources 

on potential discovery issues relating to experts, the parties have agreed to certain limitations on 

the scope of expert-related discovery and testimony in this matter. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant 

and subject to Court approval, as follows: 

The following categories of data, information, or documents need not be disclosed by any 

party, and are outside the scope of permissible discovery (including deposition questions): 

1. Any notes or other writings taken or prepared by or for an expert witness in 

connection with this matter, including correspondence or memos to or from, and notes of 

conversations with any person, including, but not limited to, the expert’s assistants and/or clerical 

or support staff, other fact or expert witnesses or non-testifying expert consultants, or attorneys 

for the party offering the testimony of such expert witness, unless the expert witness relies on 

those notes or other writings in connection with the expert witness’ opinions in this matter; and 

2. Any oral or written communication between an expert witness and any person, 

including, but not limited to, the expert’s assistants and/or clerical or support staff, other fact or 

expert witnesses or non-testifying expert consultants, or attorneys for the party offering the 

testimony of such expert witness, unless the expert witness relies on those oral or written 

communications in connection with the expert witness’ opinions in this matter. 

Case 5:11-cv-01263-EJD Document 219 Filed 06/08/15 Page 2 of 3
 -2-

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY, CASE NO. 11-CV-1263

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

DATED: June 4, 2015 KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP 

 By: /s Matthew Mustakoff 

Matthew L. Mustokoff 

 NIX, PATTERSON & ROACH, LLP 

 By: /s Brad Seidel 

Brad E. Seidel 

 Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel 

DATED: June 4, 2015 MAYER BROWN LLP

 By: /s Edward D. Johnson 

Edward D. Johnson 

 Counsel for Defendant, Google Inc. 

 

Filer’s Attestation: In compliance with General Order 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that concurrence 

in the filing of this Stipulation has been obtained from Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel, Matthew 

Mustakoff and Brad Seidel. 

 /s/ Edward D. Johnson .

 Edward D. Johnson 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: ____________ Honorable Edward J. Davila

 

6/8/2015

Case 5:11-cv-01263-EJD Document 219 Filed 06/08/15 Page 3 of 3