Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00862/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00862-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -1- 

PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS 

U.S.D.C. Northern District Case No. 3:15-cv-00862-RS 

THOMAS E. MULVIHILL, ESQ. (SBN 129906) 

TAMIKO A. DUNHAM, ESQ. (SBN 233455) 

ROSEANNE C. LAZZAROTTO, ESQ. (SBN 251001) 

BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 

A Professional Corporation 

555 12th Street, Suite 1800 

Oakland, CA 94607 

Telephone: (510) 834-4350 

Facsimile: (510) 839-1897 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

ESURANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ESURANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, a 

Wisconsin corporation,

 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; 

STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, a 

Delaware corporation; and WILLIAM 

GALLAGHER ASSOCIATES INSURANCE 

BROKERS, INC., a Massachusetts 

corporation, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 3:15-cv-00862-RS 

PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING 

AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS

The Hon. Richard Seeborg

Action Filed: February 25, 2015

THE COURT, having considered the Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing, 

orders as follows: 

1. Documents produced to a party to this action by another party or by any non-party business 

entity in response to compulsory process (e.g., subpoena, a document request served upon a party pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, or otherwise) in connection with the parties’ investigation of the circumstances 

underlying this action are deemed authentic for the purposes of this action only, absent good cause. Good 

cause would include issues relating to the completeness of the document (e.g., missing or incomplete pages) 

Case 3:15-cv-00862-RS Document 101 Filed 09/14/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -2- 

PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS 

U.S.D.C. Northern District Case No. 3:15-cv-00862-RS 

or any conditions in the actual document or the manner in which it was produced that bring into question 

whether the document was actually generated by the relevant party or non-party business entity. 

2. Documents produced to a party to this action by another party or by any non-party business 

entity in response to compulsory process (e.g., subpoena, a document request served upon a party pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, or otherwise) in connection with the parties’ investigation of the circumstances 

underlying this action shall be deemed to satisfy the evidentiary foundation requirements for 

admissibility, including under Fed. R. Evid Rule 803 (6), for the purposes of this lawsuit only, 

absent good cause and subject to all other evidentiary objections to admissibility of the documents, 

all of which other objections are retained by the parties. Good cause would include circumstances 

under which the source of the information featured in the document or the circumstances of its 

preparation indicate a lack of trustworthiness. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ______________, 2016 

 _____________________________________ 

THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

9/14

Case 3:15-cv-00862-RS Document 101 Filed 09/14/16 Page 2 of 2