Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-05347/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-05347-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

WILLIAM N. WOODSON I11 SBN 73224 

WOODSON & ALLEN, LLP 

41669 Date St.. Suite 200 

Murrieta, CA 92562 

951 698-1 122 6 A $ (95 1) 894-2246 

Attorney Plaintiff James Esoimeme 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH 

JAMES ESOIMEME 

Plaintiff, 

VS. 

UNITED AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, 

Defendant. 

NO. C 02 5347 BZ 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING 

HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S 

MOTION TO DISMISS; CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

THE PARTIES HERETO RECITE THE FOLLOWING STIPULATION: 

The parties have begun limited discovery on the issues raised by Defendant's Motion to 

Dismiss, re-characterized by the Court as a Motion for Summary Judgment, currently set for 

hearing on March 2 1,2007 at 10:OO a.m. (See Court's Januarv29.2007 Further Briefing Order.) 

In order to complete the discovery necessary to address the issues before the court, the parties 

need a little more time given existing trial schedules, and the time requirements to complete the 

discovery. Therefore, the parties agree that the court should continue the discovery due dates, 

the briefing dates, and the hearing date approximately 30 to 45 days beyond that currently set. 

In other words, the parties suggest that a discovery completion date of April 6,2007 be entered, 

Stipulation and Order Continuing CMC 1 

Case 3:02-cv-05347-BZ Document 43 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:02-cv-05347-BZ Document 44 Filed 02/12/07 Page 1 of 3
Feb 09 07 11:3Se Waodson Rnd Rllen LLP -. ..- 9518942246 ..--- P- 3 

1 I a Defendant' s fhther briefing due date of April 2,2007 be entad, and a Plaintiffs Reaponse 

2 ) date of April 16,2007 be entad The hearing on Defadant's mition may then be set at the 

3 court's discretion, some time later in April 2007, or at the court's discretion. I 

Date: 2/09/06 

Woodson & Allen, LLP 

For Plaintiff James Esoimeme 

by Joe L. Allen 

Littler Mendelson P.C. 

For United Airlines, Inc. 

by ArttnvM. Epoch / 

Stl~uhefon lrnd Order Coatinuhe CMC 2 

Rece l ved Feb-09-07 10 :35m F 1-95] 8942246 To-L ITTLER ERDELSON Pam 003 

Case 3:02-cv-05347-BZ Document 43 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:02-cv-05347-BZ Document 44 Filed 02/12/07 Page 2 of 3
ORDER 

Pursuant to the above stipulation of the parties, and good cause otherwise appearing 

therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

1. Discovery related to the matters raised in the motion shall be completed no later than 

2. The Defendant's additional briefing in support of the motion shall be filed no later than 

3. Plaintiffs Response to Defendant's motion shall be filed no later than 

4. The hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to 

Date: 

Honorable Bernard Limmerman 

Magistrate Judge of the Court. 

C:Documents and Settings\CBmera\Client flesEsoimemeWleadingsktip and order continuing CMC and other related dates.wpd 

Stipulation and Order Continuing CMC 3 

Case 3:02-cv-05347-BZ Document 43 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 3 of 3

April 6, 2007 April 4, 2007 April 18, 2007; Defendant's reply shall be filed no later than April 25, 2007. May 2, 2007 February 12, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 3:02-cv-05347-BZ Document 44 Filed 02/12/07 Page 3 of 3