Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04871/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-04871-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

CASE NO. C 03-04871 JW (CLOSED)

DURIE TANGRI LLP

DARALYN J. DURIE--#169825

 ddurie@durietangri.com

MICHAEL H. PAGE--#154913 mpage@durietangri.com

217 Leidesdorff Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 362-6666

Facsimile: (415) 236-6300

Attorneys for Plaintiff.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

PixArt Imaging Inc.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Avago Technologies, Inc.

Defendant.

Case No. C10-00544 HRL

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD 

BE RELATED

Related Case No. C 03-04871 JW (CLOSED)

Pursuant to Local Rules 3-12 and 7-11, Plaintiff PixArt Imaging Inc. hereby moves this 

Court for an order relating this action to a previously dismissed action, Pixart v. Avago, Case No. 

C 03-04871 JW (“PixArt 1”). This action seeks a declaratory judgment regarding the scope of 

the patent license and settlement agreement entered into between the parties in Pixart 1. The 

settlement in Pixart 1 included forum and venue selection provisions naming this Court as the 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

2/19/2010

Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 221 Filed 02/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

CASE NO. C 03-04871 JW (CLOSED)

venue for any further disputes arising out of that settlement. Because the two actions concern the 

same parties, property, transactions and events, and because it appears likely that there will be an 

unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense if the newly-filed case is conducted before 

a different Judge, PixArt moves that the instant case be deemed a related case and assigned to 

Judge Ware.

Dated: February 8, 2010 DURIE TANGRI LLP

By:___/Michael H. Page/_____

Michael H. Page

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PixArt Imaging, Inc.

Case 5:03-cv-04871-JW Document 221 Filed 02/19/10 Page 2 of 2