Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02331/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02331-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2331

TERESA WINFUL,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

 Defendant – Appellee,

and

GEORGE OHLANDT; CECILE KAMATH, in their official 

capacities,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(2:13-cv-02150-DCN)

Submitted: July 25, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Lewis Mann Cromer, Ryan K. Hicks, J. LEWIS CROMER & 

ASSOCIATES, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Bob 

J. Conley, Caroline W. Cleveland, CLEVELAND & CONLEY, LLC, 

Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Appeal: 15-2331 Doc: 32 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2331 Doc: 32 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Teresa Winful appeals the district court’s order granting 

the Medical University of South Carolina’s summary judgment 

motion on Winful’s retaliation and gender and race 

discrimination claims, which were brought pursuant to Title VII 

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e 

to 2000e-17 (2012) (Title VII).* We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment. Winful v. The Med. Univ. of SC, No. 

2:13-cv-02150-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2015). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Winful also asserted claims of age discrimination, in 

violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 

as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2015); 

discrimination, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012); and 

civil conspiracy, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2012). 

Winful stipulated to dismissal of these claims.

Appeal: 15-2331 Doc: 32 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 3 of 3