Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-md-02555/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-md-02555-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE: COCA-COLA PRODUCTS 

MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES 

LITIGATION (NO. II) 

This document relates to: 

Engurasoff v. The Coca-Cola Company, et 

al., Case No. 4:13-cv-03990-JSW 

Aumiller v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al., Case No. 4:14-cv-1447-JSW 

Merritt v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al.,

Case No. 4:14-cv-01067-JSW 

Nobles v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al.,

Case No. 4:13-cv-05071 

Case No. 14-md-02555-JSW 

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO 

CONSOLIDATE 

Re: Docket No. 80 

On August 11, 2015, Plaintiffs’ filed a motion for consolidation of the California and 

Florida Actions, which is noticed for a hearing on October 2, 2015. (Docket No. 80, Motion to 

Consolidate (“Mot.”).) In their motion, Plaintiffs assert that their previous motion to consolidate, 

which was filed in Engurasoff v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al., 13-cv-03990-JSW, “is still 

pending.” (Mot. At 3:7.) In fact, the Court denied that motion on August 21, 2014. (Docket No. 

73, Order Denying in Part and Granting in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss at 1:21-24.) Thus, 

that motion is not still pending. 

Because the Court’s ruling was without prejudice to re-filing the motion, it is 

HEREBY ORDERED that if Plaintiffs wish to rely on the brief and evidence submitted in support 

of the motion to consolidate filed in the Engurasoff case, they shall re-file that motion in this case 

by no later than August 17, 2015. The hearing shall remain on calendar on October 2, 2015. 

Defendants’ response shall be due two weeks after Plaintiffs re-file the motion, and Plaintiffs’ 

Case 4:14-md-02555-JSW Document 82 Filed 08/12/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

rep

pre

tho

the

Co

Dis

Da

ply shall be d

If Defen

eviously filed

ose briefs in 

If the C

e parties in ad

All part

urt, even if t

strict Civil L

IT IS S

ated: August 

due one week

ndants and P

d, rather than

this case. 

Court finds th

dvance of th

ties are HER

they had pre

Local Rule 5

SO ORDER

12, 2015 

k after Defen

Plaintiffs inte

n filing new 

he motion su

he hearing da

REBY ORDE

eviously subm

.1(e)(7). 

RED. 

2

ndants file th

end to subm

opposition o

uitable for di

ate. 

ERED to sub

mitted cham

heir oppositi

mit the oppos

or reply brie

isposition wi

bmit chambe

mbers copies 

__

JE

Un

ion. 

ition and rep

efs and evide

ithout oral a

ers copies of

of these brie

___________

EFFREY S. W

nited States D

ply briefs an

ence, they sh

argument, it s

f their briefs

efs, pursuant

__________

WHITE 

District Judg

nd evidence 

hall re-file 

shall notify 

 to the 

t to Northern

____ 

ge 

n

Case 4:14-md-02555-JSW Document 82 Filed 08/12/15 Page 2 of 2