Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00013/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00013-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MILTON OTIS LEWIS,

Petitioner, CIV-S-02-0013 FCD GGH DP

vs. DEATH PENALTY CASE

JEANNE WOODFORD, Warden, ORDER

Respondent.

 /

The court has approved the most recent attorneys’ fees and expenses voucher in

the above referenced case.

Henceforth, every voucher submitted for payment shall contain a statement

regarding whether the fees and expenses are within the budget limitations set by order and if not,

why not. The statement shall also include any prognosticated budget overruns and the reasons

therefore.

The court also notes that Lexis charges are made individual to this case. The

court requests a letter of clarification whether counsel has an omnibus Lexis account, i.e., an

account for which a general charge is made regardless of the amount of time spent in actual 

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:02-cv-00013-TLN-JDP Document 117 Filed 08/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

research, or whether each and every research event in counsel’s office receives a separate Lexis

billing for which payment is made. 

Dated: 8/1/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:gh

lewi0013.sta

Case 2:02-cv-00013-TLN-JDP Document 117 Filed 08/02/07 Page 2 of 2