Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-2_05-cv-02022/USCOURTS-arwd-2_05-cv-02022-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

SHERRY A. FOPSEST

VS.

Jo ANNE B. BARN AR t , CoMMtsstoNtiR

SoclAL ST'CI.JRITY ADMINISl.RA'IION

IN THE IjNII'ED STATES I]ISTRICT COURT

WES'iERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

I"ORT SMITH DIVISION

Crvrl N0().05-2022

PLAINTIFF

I)FFENDANl

JUDGMENI

Now on this bA day of Tlla#A, 2006, oomes on for consideration the Repofl and

Rccommendation dated F'cbruarv 16. 2006, by the llonorable Beverly Stites Jones, United State$

Magistrate Judge [br the Wcstern District of Arkansas. Ten(10) days have passed without objections

heing filed by the partie$. 'l'he Court has reviewcd this case, anti being well antl suffrciently advised,

finds that the Repoft and Recornmendation isproper and should be adopted in its entitety.

Accordingly, thc Court hereby adopts thc Report and Recommendation; revetses thc decision of the

Commissioner; and temands this case to the Commissioner for l'urther consideration pursuanto

sentcnce four of42 U.S.C. $ a05(g).

If plaintif'fl wishcs to request an award ofattorney's fees arrd cost under the Equal Access to

.Iustice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. g 2412,, an application may be filed up until 30 days after thejudgrnent

beconres "not appcalable" i.e., 30 days after thc 60-day time lbr appeal has ended. lJee Shalala v.

SchaeJer,509 tJ.S. 2e2,296,113 S.Ct.2625 (19e3);28 u.SA $$ 241z(dxIXts),(dX?XG).

IT IS SO ORDI,RED.

*'stuefi *'dp]fffrT#fthsns

MAR00mm

cHSlS n JctiNsfrl, cLfRK

TY

OEPTIIY GLERK

[.ED STATES DIST'RICT JIIDGE

Case 2:05-cv-02022-RTD Document 8 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>