Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00123/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00123-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

D. REYNOSO, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:08-cv-00123-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 5)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On January 30, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a

Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DISMISSED as it does not allege grounds that would entitle

Petitioner to habeas corpus relief. These Findings and

Recommendation were served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the

date of service of that order. On February 11, 2008, Petitioner

filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

//

/

Case 1:08-cv-00123-OWW -DLB Document 9 Filed 03/24/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendation are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed January 30, 2008,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as it

does not allege grounds that would entitle Petitioner to habeas

corpus relief; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 24, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00123-OWW -DLB Document 9 Filed 03/24/08 Page 2 of 2