Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00203/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00203-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCES M. ESPINOSA, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MONEY STORE, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

DARREL L. ESPINOSA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF NEW YORK, ET AL.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

DARREL L. ESPINOSA,

Plaintiff,

v.

KARL RUDOLPH, ET AL.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

No. 2:00-cv-2010-MCE-GGH-PS

RELATED CASE ORDER

No. 2:02-cv-0800-MCE-GGH-PS

No. 2:04-cv-0203-MCE-GGH-PS

Case 2:04-cv-00203-MCE -GGH Document 130 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

O. PAUL SCHLENVOGT, ET AL., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SCOTT MARSHALL, ET AL, 

Defendants. 

___________________________/

No. 2:06-cv-1192-MCE-KJM-PS 

Examination of the above-entitled civil actions reveals that

these actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 83-

123(a) (E.D. Cal. 1997). The actions involve many of the same

Defendants and are based on the same or similar claims, the same

property transaction or event, similar questions of fact and the

same questions of law, and would therefore entail a substantial

duplication of labor if heard by different judges. Accordingly,

the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to

effect a substantial savings of judicial effort and is also

likely to be convenient for the parties. 

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under

Local Rule 83-123 merely has the result that all actions are

assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the action is

effected. Under the regular practice of this Court, related

cases are generally assigned to the district judge and magistrate

judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. 

A Related Case Order was issued April 9, 2004 relating

actions denominated 2:00-cv-2010-MCE-GGH-PS, Frances M. Espinosa,

et al. v. Money Stores, Inc., et al.; 2:02-cv-0800-MCE-GGH-PS,

Darrel L. Espinosa v. Bank of New York, et al.; and 2:04-cv-0203-

MCE-GGH-PS, Darrel L. Espinosa v. Karl Rudolph, et al. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-00203-MCE -GGH Document 130 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that case 2:06-cv-1192-MCE-KJM-PS,

O. Paul Schlenvogt, et al. v. Scott Marshall, et al. is hereby

reassigned to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. and Gregory G.

Hollows for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set

in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the

caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown

as 2:06-cv-1192-MCE-GGH-PS.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make

appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to

compensate for this reassignment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 20, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00203-MCE -GGH Document 130 Filed 06/20/06 Page 3 of 3