Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00566/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00566-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. and [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Respondent to File a Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

STEPHEN P. ACQUISTO

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

MARIA G. CHAN, State Bar No. 192130

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 323-1940

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Respondents 

SA2006301234

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD BULPITT,

Petitioner,

v.

KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS,

Respondent.

NO. 2:06-cv-00566-MCE-GGH

STIPULATION AND ORDER

EXTENDING TIME FOR

RESPONDENT TO FILE A

RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR A

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

The parties hereby stipulate to a 30-day extension of time for Respondent to file a

response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. 

The basis of this request is that Respondent has not yet received the documents

necessary to file an appropriate response to the Petition. This case was received by the Attorney

General’s Office in Sacramento on April 10, 2006. On the same day, a case file was opened and

assigned to Maria G. Chan, Deputy Attorney General. 

On April 11, 2006, relevant documents were requested from Petitioner’s prison file. 

Those documents have not yet been received by this office. This office also requested the lower

Case 2:06-cv-00566-MCE -GGH Document 6 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. and [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Respondent to File a Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

2

court orders relating to this matter. As of this date, no orders have been received. As a result,

Respondent is unable to properly address the issues raised in the petition. 

For these reasons, the parties stipulate to a 30-day extension of time for Respondent to

file a response to the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Given that Petitioner’s claim is one

of excessive confinement and entitled to parole, however, he remains anxious for timely

resolution of it and his stipulation here should not be taken for tolerance of Respondent’s delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: May 10, 2006 /s/ Maria G. Chan

 

MARIA G. CHAN

Deputy Attorney General

Attorney for Respondent

Dated: May 10, 2006 /s/ Michael Satris

 

MICHAEL SATRIS

Attorney for Petitioner

Respondent’s response is due June 9, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 5/23/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

_________________________________

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

U.S. Magistrate Judge

bul566.eot.wpd

Case 2:06-cv-00566-MCE -GGH Document 6 Filed 05/23/06 Page 2 of 2