Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02592/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02592-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 46:1156 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

**E-filed 7/14/10**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TANIA GARCIA-LOPEZ, et al.,

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MICHAEL YATES, et al., 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 09-2592 RS 

ORDER RE PREVIOUSLY GRANTED 

CONTINUANCE 

The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s motion to continue the hearing on the cross-motions 

for summary judgment from July 15, 2010 to July 29, 2010, by executing Plaintiff’s proposed order, 

which erroneously stated that the motion was “unopposed.” The Court is aware from the body of 

plaintiff’s motion that defendants in fact opposed the motion on grounds that counsel had already 

purchased airfare and had arranged a vacation. Although the Court strongly discourages telephonic 

appearances at law and motion, should defense counsel wish to appear by telephone at the continued 

hearing, the Court will accommodate a written request to do so, although it may require both sides 

to appear by telephone in that event. 

Dated: 7/14/10 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:09-cv-02592-RS Document 37 Filed 07/14/10 Page 1 of 1