Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01248/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01248-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Horace Bell is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

1983. 

On February 5, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was 

served on Plaintiff and contained notice to the parties that Objections to the Findings and 

Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Objection on February 17, 

2015, and an Amended Objection on February 19, 2015. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

///

HORACE BELL,

 Plaintiff,

v.

S HEBERLING, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-01248-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION

[ECF Nos. 58, 60]

Case 1:12-cv-01248-AWI-SAB Document 72 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on February 5, 2015, is adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 11, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01248-AWI-SAB Document 72 Filed 03/11/15 Page 2 of 2