Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-01502/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-01502-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SEAN O'TOOLE, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 11-cv-01502-PJH 

ORDER RE PRETRIAL FILINGS 

 On September 1, 2015, the parties in the above-captioned case filed a stipulation 

requesting an extension of the deadline to file pretrial documents. On September 4, 

2015, the court issued an order denying the requested two-week extension, but granting 

a limited extension, moving the deadline for the joint pretrial statement, trial briefs, 

motions in limine, deposition designations, witness and exhibit lists, jury instructions, and 

verdict form from September 10, 2015 to September 14, 2015. See Dkt. 181. The court 

was clear in stating that “[n]o further modification to this deadline will be considered.” Id. 

 Despite the court’s order, the parties did not comply with the deadline imposed by 

the court. No verdict form or exhibit list was filed by any party. No jury instructions were 

filed by defendants. No witness list or trial brief was filed by plaintiffs. 

 The court admonishes the parties for violating the court’s order. The parties may 

not unilaterally grant themselves the extension that was denied by the court. All 

documents set forth in section B.3 of the amended case management and pretrial order 

must be filed today, September 15, 2015, or the parties risk having their papers stricken 

and disregarded. The court will also consider sanctions for any future late filings. 

Case 4:11-cv-01502-PJH Document 198 Filed 09/15/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Da

IT IS S

ted: Septe

O ORDER

mber 15, 2

ED. 

015 

2

__

PH

Un

__________

HYLLIS J. H

nited States

__________

HAMILTON

s District Ju

__________

dge 

______ 

Case 4:11-cv-01502-PJH Document 198 Filed 09/15/15 Page 2 of 2