Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-01725/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-01725-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FITNESS ANYWHERE LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

WOSS ENTERPRISES LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-01725-BLF 

ORDER CLARIFYING DATES

REGARDING MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On March 31, 2016, the Court granted the parties’ stipulated request to change time 

regarding the motions summary judgment. ECF 128. Specifically that order held that (1) 

Defendant’s reply to its motion for summary judgment is due on May 19, 2016; (2) Defendant’s 

opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is due on May 19, 2016 and Plaintiff’s 

reply is due May 26, 2016. Id. The Court also set the hearings on these motions for June 9, 2016. 

Id.

Subsequently, on April 25, 2016, Plaintiff filed its motion for partial summary judgment. 

In doing so, Plaintiff, on the ECF docket entry, indicated that any opposition was due by May 9, 

2016, any reply was due by May 16, 2016 and set a hearing on its motion for June 2, 2016. ECF 

132. 

On May 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice, stating that Defendant did not file any opposition 

by May 9, 2016, the due date indicated by Plaintiff in the docket for its motion for summary 

judgment. ECF 134. Defendant filed a response, stating that the stipulated scheduled indicated 

that its opposition was due by May 19, 2016 and that it would file an opposition by May 17, 2016 

in light of Plaintiff’s notice.

Accordingly, the Court clarifies the dates surrounding the parties’ pending motions for 

Case 5:14-cv-01725-BLF Document 136 Filed 05/16/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

summary judgment:

1. Defendant’s reply to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is due May 19, 

2016.

2. Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is due May 

19, 2016.

3. Plaintiff’s reply to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is due by May 26, 

2016.

The Court SETS the hearing on all three pending motions (Plaintiff’s motion for summary 

judgment, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary 

injunction) for June 2, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 16, 2016

 ______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-01725-BLF Document 136 Filed 05/16/16 Page 2 of 2