Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01777/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-01777-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 08:1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The court also notes that Plaintiff could have voluntarily dismissed the action without a court

order under FRCP Rule 41(a)(1). Rule 41(a)(1) requires only a stipulation of dismissal signed by all

parties, prior to service of an answer or motion for summary judgment.

- 1 - 07cv1777

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MALI FAHIMA,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 07 CV 1777 JM (CAB)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

vs. MOTION TO DISMISS

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff brought this mandamus action to compel the United States Citizenship and

Immigration Service (“CIS”) to adjudicate her I-485 application to adjust status. On December 12,

2007, Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw her complaint because CIS adjudicated her application.

Defendants filed a noticed of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure (“FRCP”) Rule 41(a)(2), the court construes Plaintiff’s motion as a motion to dismiss and

hereby GRANTS dismissal.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 26, 2007

 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller

 United States District Judge

cc: All parties

Case 3:07-cv-01777-JM-CAB Document 8 Filed 12/27/07 Page 1 of 1