Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01290/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01290-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HERBERT L. PRICE, 

Plaintiff,

 v.

ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, et

al.

Defendants.

 /

No. C 06-1290 JSW

ORDER RE COUNTERMOTIONS

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

RE HEARINGS ON PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AND

ASTRAZENCA’S MOTION TO

STAY

This matter comes before the Court on the motion for administrative relief filed by

Defendants Astrazeneca Pharmaceutical LP and Astrazeneca LP, in which they request that the

Court continue Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss and consolidate that motion for hearing with their

motion to stay. Plaintiff filed a counter-motion for administrative relief, in which he states he

does not oppose a consolidated hearing but requests an earlier hearing date. Defendants oppose

Plaintiff’s counter-motion on the ground that their counsel is unavailable on the dates selected

by Plaintiff.

The Court DENIES both administrative motions, and VACATES the noticed hearing

dates on both the motion to dismiss and the motion to stay.

Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss this action is fully briefed. 

Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to stay is already on file, accordingly, Defendants’

reply brief shall be due on Wednesday August 23, 2006. Upon receipt of that brief, the Court

shall take the matters under submission. 

Case 3:06-cv-01290-JSW Document 26 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If the Court believes a hearing is warranted, it shall notify the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 17, 2006 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-01290-JSW Document 26 Filed 08/17/06 Page 2 of 2