Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06489/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06489-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANGELO JONATHAN JOHNSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

ANTHONY KANE, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

CV F 04 6489 AWI SMS HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION [Doc. #18]

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

AND DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS [Doc. #12]

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On May 18, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition be GRANTED and the petition for writ of habeas

corpus be DISMISSED for violating the statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).

This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any

objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date

of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:04-cv-06489-AWI -SMS Document 19 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued May 18, 2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED; 

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06489-AWI -SMS Document 19 Filed 07/27/05 Page 2 of 2