Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-02664/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-02664-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Brandon Mykel Wood, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-14-02664-PHX-PGR (ESW)

REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

 The Court having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss (Doc. 11), and 

good cause appearing, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED recommending that the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss 

(Doc. 11) be granted. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED recommending that this lawsuit be dismissed with 

prejudice as to all Defendants, each party to bear their own respective attorneys’ fees and 

costs. 

 This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth 

Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1) 

should not be filed until entry of the District Court’s judgment. The parties shall have 

fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to 

file specific written objections with the Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

6, 72. Thereafter, the parties have fourteen days within which to file a response to the 

objections. Failure to file timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Case 2:14-cv-02664-PGR Document 13 Filed 04/29/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the Report and Recommendation by the 

District Court without further review. Failure to file timely objections to any factual 

determinations of the Magistrate Judge may be considered a waiver of a party’s right to 

appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the 

Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 

1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1146-47 (9th Cir. 2007). 

 Dated this 28th day of April, 2015. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:14-cv-02664-PGR Document 13 Filed 04/29/15 Page 2 of 2