Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-02000/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-02000-57/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[COMPAL'S ALTERNATIVE PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

O2 MICRO'S MOTION TO COMPEL (DKT # 339)

CASE NO. C 06-02929 CW (EDL)

KAI TSENG (STATE BAR NO. 193756)

MATTHEW J. HULT (STATE BAR NO. 197137)

SANJEET K. DUTTA (STATE BAR NO. 203463)

HSIANG H. LIN (STATE BAR NO. 241472)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: 650-614-7400

Facsimile: 650-614-7401

Attorneys for Defendant

COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

O2 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,

a Cayman Islands corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.,

a California corporation, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C 06-02929 CW (EDL)

(Consolidated with Case No. 

C 04-2000 CW (EDL))

[COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.’S

ALTERNATIVE PROPOSED] 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART O2 MICRO 

INTERNATIONAL LIMITED'S 

MOTION TO COMPEL COMPAL 

ELECTRONICS, INC.'S 

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 

(DKT. # 339)

Date: October 3, 2006

Time: 2:00PM

Courtroom: Courtroom E, 15th Floor

Judge: Hon. Magistrate Judge

Elizabeth D. Laporte

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS, 

CROSS-CLAIMS AND THIRD-PARTY 

CLAIMS.

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 571 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 578 Filed 10/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

[COMPAL'S ALTERNATIVE PROPOSED] ORDER RE

O2 MICRO'S MOTION TO COMPEL (DKT # 339)

CASE NO. C 06-02929 CW (EDL)

ORDER

Having considered the pleadings and papers filed and the arguments presented at the 

October 3, 2006 hearing on this matter, the Court hereby GRANTS O2 Micro’s Motion to Compel 

Compal’s Production of Documents (Dkt. #339). It is hereby ORDERED that Compal shall produce:

1. Updated Notebook Sales and Cost Reports for USA Area summaries from 

January 1, 2005 to the fact discovery cut-off of August 18, 2006;

2. Updated Quantity of Inverters Purchased (Monthly by Inverter Chip Model 

Number) from January 1, 2005 to the fact discovery cut-off of August 18, 2006;

3. Updated Notebook Sales Report for USA area from January 1, 2005 to the fact 

discovery cut-off of August 18, 2006; and

4. Updated Notebook Configuration Report from January 1, 2005 to the fact 

discovery cut-off of August 18, 2006.

Compal shall have until January 3, 2007 to complete production of documents listed in 

(1) to (4) above.

The parties have stipulated regarding inspection of Compal’s electronically searchable 

summaries at Orrick’s offices in Menlo Park, CA, thus this issue is moot.

The Court denies O2 Micro’s request for further responses to its Requests for 

Admission Nos. 1 and 2 for not satisfying the appropriate meet and confer requirements prior to filing 

its motion. 

It is SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

Honorable Elizabeth LaPorte 

United States Magistrate Judge 

OHS West:260106404.1

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 571 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 2 of 2

October 11, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 4:04-cv-02000-CW Document 578 Filed 10/11/06 Page 2 of 2