Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02725/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02725-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

REVEREND WESLEY CRAWFORD SR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LISA M. MOORE, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:14-cv-2725 JAM AC (PS) 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

 On April 13, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 13) Neither 

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 13, 2015 (ECF No. 13), are adopted in 

full; 

 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7) is granted as follows: 

Case 2:14-cv-02725-JAM-AC Document 14 Filed 06/15/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 a. The claim against Moore under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 

U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., is dismissed with prejudice; 

 b. The claim under Section 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, is dismissed with prejudice; 

 c. The claim under Section 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of the Due 

Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, is dismissed with leave to 

amend within 30 days; 

 d. The claim under Section 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of the Equal 

Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, is dismissed with 

prejudice; 

 e. That the claim under Section 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of the Due 

Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, is dismissed with prejudice; 

 f. The claim under Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000a, et 

seq., is dismissed with prejudice; and 

 g. The claim under Section 8(f), 29 U.S.C. § 158(f), is dismissed with prejudice. 

DATED: June 12, 2015 

 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 2:14-cv-02725-JAM-AC Document 14 Filed 06/15/15 Page 2 of 2