Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca11-24-13585/USCOURTS-ca11-24-13585-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 

---

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-13585

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

ROBERT WALKER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

VICTORIA RUIZ, 

ALBERTELLI LAW, P.A.

U.S. BANK HOME MORTGAGE, 

d.b.a. U.S. Bank National Association,

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

USCA11 Case: 24-13585 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 01/13/2025 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 24-13585

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 2:24-cv-14222-KMM

____________________

Before ROSENBAUM, LAGOA, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Robert Walker appeals from numerous orders entered by the 

magistrate judge, and from the district court’s order denying his 

motion to remand the case to state court. However, the district 

court has not adopted the magistrate judge orders or otherwise 

rendered them final, so they are not immediately appealable. See 

28 U.S.C. § 1291; Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 1061, 

1066-67 (11th Cir. 1982) (explaining that magistrate judge orders 

issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) are not final and may not be 

appealed until rendered final by a district court); Perez-Priego v. Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148 F.3d 1272, 1273 (11th Cir. 1998) (holding 

that a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that has not 

been adopted by the district court is not final and immediately appealable). The district court’s order denying Walker’s motion to 

remand also is not appealable at this time. See Woodard v. STP 

Corp., 170 F.3d 1043, 1044 (11th Cir. 1999) (holding that the denial 

of a motion for remand of a case removed to federal court is not 

USCA11 Case: 24-13585 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 01/13/2025 Page: 2 of 3
24-13585 Opinion of the Court 3

final and cannot be reviewed prior to final judgment unless it is 

certified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies 

with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all 

other applicable rules.

USCA11 Case: 24-13585 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 01/13/2025 Page: 3 of 3