Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05385/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05385-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT McNEELEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

CA DEPT. CORRECTIONS, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 02 5385 AWI LJO P 

ORDER STRIKING SURREPLY FROM

RECORD (Doc. 93.) 

 Robert McNeeley (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 6, 2005, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 88.) 

Plaintiff filed an opposition to the Motion (titled “Response to Motion for Summary Judgment”)

on December 9, 2005. (Doc. 90.) On January 4, 2006, Defendant filed a Response to Plaintiff’s

opposition. (Doc. 91.) Plaintiff then filed a “Reply” to Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s

Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment on January 19, 2006. (Doc. 93.) 

Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Local Rules provides the right to file

a surreply, and the court has not ordered one. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s surreply, titled “Reply to

Defendant’s Objection to Plaintiff’s Objection of Motion for Summary Judgment” IS 

DISREGARDED AND STRICKEN from the record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05385-AWI -LJO Document 94 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 1