Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02933/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02933-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

28

26

27

28

JASON RABINOWITZ, SBN 183822

COSTA KERESTENZIS, SBN 186125

EILEEN M. BISSEN, SBN 245821

BEESON, T A YER & BODINE, APC

520 Capitol Mall, Suite 300

Sacramento, CA 95814-4714

Telephone: (916) 325-2100

Facsimile: (916) 325-2120

Email: jrabinowitz~beesontayer.com.ckerestenzis~beesontayer.com.

ebissen~beesontayer .com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DONALD MORTON and

DANIEL SANCHEZ

JEFFERY OWENSBY, ESQ.

REDIGER, MCHUGH & HUBBERT LLP

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1240

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 442-0033

Attorneys for Defendant

VALLEY FARM TRANSPORT, INe.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD MORTON, et aI., Case No. C 06-02933 SI (ADR)

Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT

v. CONFERENCE

VALLEY FARM TRANSPORT, INC.,

Defendants.

SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THIS COURT, the parties respectfully request that the Court

continue the Case Management Conference (CMC) currently set for November 9,2007 to December

7,2007, or sometime thereafter. The parties contend there is good cause for this request as follows.

The CMC was continued to November 9,2007 so that the parties could conduct mediation and

Stipulation; Order

1

7208 I.doc

Case 3:06-cv-02933-SI Document 56 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:06-cv-02933-SI Document 57 Filed 11/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

28

26

27

28

inform the Court after the mediation about settlement or the need to proceed with scheduling of the

case. The parties have already met twice and progress has been made. The parties have scheduled to

meet again on November 20, 2007. The parties expect to either resolve the matter or conclude their

current mediation efforts at that session. Accordingly, the parties seek continuance of the CMC to a

date aftèr the parties have concluded mediation in case the paries fail to reach a settlement through

the mediation process.

The request for continuance is not brought for any improper purpose nor should any pary be

prejudiced by the continuance.

Date: November 8, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

BEESON, TA YER & BODINE, APC

By: Isl

COSTA KERESTENZIS

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Date: November 8, 2007

Respectfully submitted,

REDIGER, MCHUGH & HUBBERT, LLP

By: Isl

JEFFERY OWENSBY

Attorneys for Defendant

IT is SO ORDERED.

Date:

SUSAN ILLS TON

United States District Court Judge

2

Stipulation; Order 7208 I.doc

Case 3:06-cv-02933-SI Document 56 Filed 11/08/2007 Page 2 of 2 Case 3:06-cv-02933-SI Document 57 Filed 11/13/07 Page 2 of 2