Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03862/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03862-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

Case No.: 5:15-cv-03862-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

TONETTA WADE,

Plaintiff,

v.

BOEING EMPLOYEE CREDIT UNION, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:15-cv-03862-EJD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On January 26, 2016, the court issued an order requiring the parties to meet and confer in 

order to reach an agreement on one ADR process and file, within 10 days, either (1) the form 

entitled “Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Selecting ADR Process” if an agreement is reached on 

one form of ADR, or (2) the form entitled “Notice of Need of ADR Phone Conference.” Dkt. No. 

87. As of the date and time this was order was filed, the parties have not complied and the time 

for compliance has expired.

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to appear before the Honorable Edward J. Davila on 

May 26, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 1, 5th Floor, United States District Court, 280 S. 

First Street, San Jose, California, 95113, to show cause why the court should not impose any and 

all appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal of this action, on the parties, 

or any of them, for willful disobedience of a court order.

The parties may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions

Case 5:15-cv-03862-EJD Document 88 Filed 05/12/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:15-cv-03862-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

should not be imposed on or before May 19, 2016. In doing so, however, they must (1) explain 

their failure to comply with the original deadline to file one of the ADR forms, and (2) must also 

file one of the forms contemplated by the January 26th Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-03862-EJD Document 88 Filed 05/12/16 Page 2 of 2