Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04661/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04661-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07685.1397/5130626.1 1 3:14-cv-04661-SC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF

DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A

MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)

mdl@severson.com

ERIK KEMP (State Bar No. 246196)

ek@severson.com

ALISA A. GIVENTAL (State Bar No. 273551)

aag@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-3344

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439

SCOTT J. HYMAN (State Bar No. 148709)

sjh@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

The Atrium

19100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700

Irvine, California 92612

Telephone: (949) 442-7110

Facsimile: (949) 442-7118

Attorneys for Defendant

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUMIT ROY, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON

BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

SITUATED,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:14-cv-04661-SC

Honorable Samuel Conti

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT WELLS

FARGO BANK, N.A.

Action Filed: October 20, 2014

Trial Date: None Set

Case 3:14-cv-04661-SC Document 32 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

07685.1397/5130626.1 2 3:14-cv-04661-SC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF

DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties set forth above, all claims asserted in this action

by plaintiff Sumit Roy against defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) are Dismissed

with Prejudice.

As to any absent, putative class members who may be deemed to assert or to have asserted

claims against Wells Fargo in this action, such claims are hereby Dismissed without Prejudice.

Each Party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

09/29/2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:14-cv-04661-SC Document 32 Filed 09/29/15 Page 2 of 2