Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06615/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06615-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1333 Admiralty

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGER LEWIS JENAN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

DEBRA BERG; AND BERNARD A. )

TE VELDE, )

)

DefendantS. )

____________________________________)

CV F 04-6615 AWI LJO

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW

(Document #26)

Plaintiff Roger Lewis Jenan brought this action as a result of Defendants’ foreclosure sale

of real property that had been owned by Plaintiff. On February 2, 2005, the court granted

Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissed this action because the court lacked jurisdiction. 

The Clerk of the Court then closed this case.

An administrative review of the docket in this action reveals that a motion has been

administratively termed as an outstanding motion. On May 27, 2005, Marjorie Lou Jenan filed a

request to withdraw from this case. Because this action has been closed, a motion to withdraw

as a party is unnecessary because this action is now over. In addition, it is unclear if Marjorie

Lou Jenan was ever a Plaintiff to this action. Regardless, the court’s dismissal of this action

renders any motion concerning the proper plaintiffs moot.

Case 1:04-cv-06615-AWI-LJO Document 31 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

 Accordingly, the court ORDERS that Plaintiff’s May 27, 2005 motion to withdraw from

the case is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 28, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06615-AWI-LJO Document 31 Filed 03/28/06 Page 2 of 2