Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05068/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05068-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAP CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

MCAFEE, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-05068-JD 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court sets the following case management deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10. The parties are advised to review and comply with the 

Court’s Standing Order for Civil Cases, Standing Order for Discovery in Civil Cases, and 

Standing Order for Civil Trials. 

Event Deadline

Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement contentions 

and Accompanying document Production

3/27/15

Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying 

Document Production 

5/15/15

Fact discovery cut-off Exchange of Proposed Terms for 

Construction

5/29/15

Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic 

Evidence

6/19/15

Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement 7/17/15

Completion of Claim Construction Discovery 8/27/15

Claim Construction Opening Brief 9/18/15

Case 3:14-cv-05068-JD Document 64 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Claim Construction Opposition Brief 10/16/15

Claim Construction Reply Brief 10/30/15

Tutorial

11/5/15 at 2:00 pm. Each side 

will have 45 minutes.

Claim construction hearing 11/19/15 at 2:00 pm.

Pretrial conference 8/19/16 at 3:00 pm.

Jury trial 8/31/16 at 8:30 am.

All dates set by the Court should be regarded as firm. Counsel may not modify these 

dates by stipulation without leave of court. Requests for continuances are disfavored, and

scheduling conflicts that are created subsequent to the date of this order by any party, counsel or 

party-controlled expert or witness will not be considered good cause for a continuance. Sanctions 

may issue for a failure to obey a scheduling or other pretrial order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

16(f)(1)(C).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 15, 2015

______________________________________

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-05068-JD Document 64 Filed 07/15/15 Page 2 of 2