Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01906/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01906-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 05:0554 Constitutionality of Maritime Statutes

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Stealing Home, an Arizona Limited

Liability Company, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Supper Solutions Franchising, Inc., a

Colorado Corporation; et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-1906-PHX-LOA

ORDER

This matter arises on the parties Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice (docket

# 10), filed on September 20, 2006. Notwithstanding the Court's attempts to have the parties

either voluntarily consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction or elect to have the case reassigned

to a district judge (docket # # 5, 8 and 9), the parties have apparently reached a settlement

on the merits and stipulated and agreed that this case be dismissed with prejudice as to all

parties. 

In light of their stipulation and consent to dismiss this case, the Court deems the

parties to have consented for purposes of dismissing this case only. Roell v. Withrow, 538

U.S.580 (2003) (Supreme Court held that implied consent may be inferred from a party’s

conduct “where the litigant or counsel was made aware of the need for consent and the right

to refuse it, and still voluntarily appeared to try the case before the Magistrate Judge.”)

Case 2:06-cv-01906-LOA Document 11 Filed 09/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Pursuant to stipulation and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that all claims in the above-captioned matter and this

lawsuit in its entirety is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, each party to bear its

own costs and attorney's fees.

DATED this 22nd day of September, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-01906-LOA Document 11 Filed 09/25/06 Page 2 of 2