Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01578/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01578-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Although plaintiff filed a document on December 29, 2009, it is unresponsive to the

court’s order.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUDLEY JACKLINE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1578 EFB P

vs.

UNKNOWN, ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendant.

 /

On December 15, 2009, the court found that plaintiff had attempted to initiate a civil

action without filing a complaint, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 3, and had further failed to pay

the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The court ordered plaintiff to submit a complaint and the required

filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days and warned him that

failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or paid the required

filing fee or requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to that order.1

////

Case 2:09-cv-01578-MCE -EFB Document 6 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign a United States

District Judge to this case.

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 3, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-01578-MCE -EFB Document 6 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 2