Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02289/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02289-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY CIECHALSKI,

Plaintiff,

v.

TIFFANY & CO., LTD. EMPLOYEE

BENEFITS PLAN,

Defendants. _______________________________________

No. C 06-2289 SBA 

ORDER

Defendant has filed an objection to Magistrate Judge Spero’s April 30, 2007 Order Granting in

Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-2, the Court

sets the following briefing schedule:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiff shall file and serve his response to defendant’s

objection by no later than June 6, 2007.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT defendant shall file and serve its reply to plaintiff's response

by no later than June 13, 2007.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Judge Spero’s April 30, 2007 Order Granting in Part and

Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel is STAYED until such time as this Court issues a ruling

on defendant’s objection. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

Dated: 5/23/07 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-02289-SBA Document 53 Filed 05/23/07 Page 1 of 1