Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01117/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01117-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF

CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL DEADLINE C05-01117 TEH 1

JAMES B. CHANIN (SBN# 76043)

JULIE M. HOUK (SBN# 114968)

Law Offices of James B. Chanin

3050 Shattuck Avenue

Berkeley, California 94705

Telephone: (510) 848-4752, Ext. 2

Facsimile: (510) 848-5819

Email: jbcofc@aol.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS COUSEY, et al., )

)

)

C

ST

A

I

S

P

E

U

N

L

O

AT

C

I

0

O

5-

N

01

A

1

N

17

D

T

[P

E

R

H

OPOSED] ORDER

) EXTENDING CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

vs. ) DEADLINE

)

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al, )

)

Defendants. )

)

WHEREAS, the parties have reached a tentative settlement of the entire action which

is subject to final approval by the City of Oakland City Council,

WHEREAS, the City of Oakland City Council has not yet approved the settlement, but

is expected to consider the proposed settlement for the first time in approximately mid-June

2007;

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that additional time will be

necessary to obtain the approval of the City of Oakland City Council and, assuming the City

Case 3:05-cv-01117-TEH Document 42 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF

CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL DEADLINE C05-01117 TEH 2

Council approves the settlement, additional time will be needed for the City to pay the

settlement to the plaintiffs. Therefore, the parties agree that the conditional dismissal deadline

of June 2, 2007 be extended to September 2, 2007 and that the case shall be dismissed on

September 2, 2007 with prejudice unless the parties advise the Court in writing prior to that

date that the settlement has not been finalized or have filed a Stipulation for dismissal with

prejudice prior to that time.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: May 18, 2007 _________/s/___________________

JAMES B. CHANIN

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: May 18, 2007 _________/s/__________________

STEPHEN Q. ROWELL

Attorney for Defendants

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,

IT SO ORDERED:

Dated: ___________, 2007 _______________________________

THELTON E. HENDERSON

Judge of the United States

District Court

05/21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:05-cv-01117-TEH Document 42 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 2