Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-91-08016/USCOURTS-ca10-91-08016-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

FI.L.r..,D 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United 3¥etgth~y;;.~ App;:ab 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT MAY 1 2.. 1992 

ROBERT L. HOECKEE 

DEBORAH VIENS-KORETKO, ) Clerl: 

) 

Plaintiff-Appellant, ) 

) 

V • ) 

) 

GEORGE H. ANDRIES, JR., Center Director,) 

Department of Veterans Affairs, Medical) 

and Regional Office Director; BRUCE E. ) 

STEWART, Assistant Center Director; ) 

ELEANOR D. BERBERICK, Chief, Medical ) 

Administration Service; WAYNE H. DAVIS, ) 

Chief, Personnel Service Veterans ) 

Administration; THOMAS K. TURNAGE, ) 

Administrator of Veterans Affairs; ) 

CLARENCE THOMAS, Chairman Equal ) 

Employment Opportunity Commission; ) 

DEFENDANTS X-1 through X-10, ) 

) 

Defendants-Appellees. ) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

No. 91-8016 

(D.C. No. 90-131J) 

(D. Wyo.) 

Before MOORE, TACHA, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctr ines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral e stoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 91-8016 Document: 010110247690 Date Filed: 05/12/1992 Page: 1
34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

Plaintiff-appellant Deborah Viens-Koretko appeals from the 

final judgment entered in favor of all defendants. The district 

court entered judgment following dismissal pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (6). We have carefully reviewed the parties' 

briefs, as well as the appellate record. We agree with the 

analysis of the district court and, therefore, AFFIRM for 

substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court's 

order dated February 5, 1991. 

Entered for the Court 

Deanell Reece Tacha 

Circuit Judge 

2 

Appellate Case: 91-8016 Document: 010110247690 Date Filed: 05/12/1992 Page: 2