Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_24-cv-02987/USCOURTS-azd-2_24-cv-02987-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Before the Court is the parties’ Second Stipulation to Extend Pending Deadlines 

(Doc. 35), in which they renew their previous request (Doc. 31) to extend two upcoming 

response deadlines. This Court previously extended the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond 

to the Motion to Intervene (Doc. 19) untilJanuary 3, 2025, and it also extended the deadline 

for Defendant to answer the Complaint (Doc. 1) until January 10, 2025. (Doc. 32). The 

parties once again request extensions until February 14, 2025 to respond to the Motion to 

Intervene, and until February 21, 2025 to respond to the Complaint. (Doc. 35 at 2). 

The parties argue that since this Court’s previous Order (Doc. 32), “the parties have 

held two meet-and-confer conferences and the Secretary has produced additional records 

including registration information and vote history for every active, inactive, and canceled 

voter in Arizona for the 2020, 2022 and 2024 election cycles.” (Doc. 35 at 2). However, 

they argue that “the resolution of the dispute between the parties, including their dispute 

regarding compliance with this Court’s Order, if resolution can be reached, necessitates the 

expenditure of significant time and involvement by Secretary of State’s office and 

1789 Foundation Incorporated et al.,

 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

Adrian Fontes,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-24-02987-PHX-SPL

ORDER

Case 2:24-cv-02987-SPL Document 36 Filed 01/02/25 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

significant review time by Citizen AG. The parties jointly believe that there will be the best 

opportunity for the amicable resolution of some or all of the issues at bar if a further 

extension is granted.” (Id.). Once again, the parties are vague about the difficulties they 

appear to be facing in complying with this Court’s November 1, 2024 Order (Doc. 17) to 

produce the relevant records despite the December 2, 2024 deadline established by that 

Order (Doc. 17 at 14) and despite Defendant’s December 3, 2024 Notice that the relevant 

records had been produced (Doc. 27). 

The Court will therefore grant the parties’ requested extension only with the

admonishment that no additional extensions of these deadlines will be considered.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Second Stipulation to Extend Pending Deadlines 

(Doc. 35) is granted. Responses to the Motion to Intervene as Defendants by One Arizona 

and the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans (Doc. 19) shall be due on February 14, 

2025. Defendant’s Answer or other response to Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) shall be due 

on February 21, 2025.

Dated this 2nd day of January, 2025.

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge

Case 2:24-cv-02987-SPL Document 36 Filed 01/02/25 Page 2 of 2