Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01404/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01404-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Case No. C04-1404 SC -1- 

STIPULATION RE; DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER THEREON 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNSEL 

DEBORAH PENNY BENNETT, Deputy (SBN 72282) 

400 COUNTY CENTER 

REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063-1662 

Tel: (650) 363-4746 

Fax: (650) 363-4034 

DAVID A. LEVY (SBN 77181) 

MELISSA M. HOLMES (SBN 220961) 

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. LEVY 

800 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, SUITE 314 

BURLINGAME, CA 94010 

Tel: (650) 524-0440 

Fax: (650) 348-1400 

RICHARD S. LINKERT (SBN 88756) 

MATHENY, SEARS, LINKERT & LONG 

3683 American River Drive 

SACRAMENTO, CA 95864 

Tel: (916) 978-3434 

Fax: (916) 978-3430 

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, 

a public entity, erroneously sued as SAN MATEO COUNTY 

SHERIFF’S OFFICE and SAN MATEO COUNTY WOMEN’S 

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, and SHERIFF DON HORSLEY, 

DEPUTY DAREN SCHOFIELD, CORRECTION OFFICER 

LILLIAN JOHNSON, NOMALEE TILMAN, ROSEMARY 

TAYLOR, and MAHESH KHILNANI 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LISA FIDLER, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

OFFICE, et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 Case No. C04-1404 SC 

STIPULATION RE; DISMISSAL OF 

ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; 

ORDER THEREON 

ORDER

Case 3:04-cv-01404-SC Document 77 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 2
Case No. C04-1404 SC -2- 

STIPULATION RE; DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER THEREON 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs LISA FIDLER and RITO RAMIREZ, 

through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiffs’ Complaint and Amended Complaint and all 

Causes of Action and Claims for Relief as alleged against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice, and 

that the parties will bear their own costs and attorneys fees. 

Dated: February 3, 2006 By: /S/ 

 RANDALL SCARLETT 

 CAL POTTER 

 KEVIN MCLEAN 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 

Dated: February 1, 2006 By: /S/ 

 DAVID A. LEVY 

 MELISSA M. HOLMES 

 DEBORAH PENNY BENNETT 

 RICHARD S. LINKERT 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

ORDER

 Good Cause appearing therefore, it is so ordered. 

Dated: 

 SAMUEL J. CONTI 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

2/6/06

Case 3:04-cv-01404-SC Document 77 Filed 02/06/06 Page 2 of 2