Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07761/USCOURTS-ca4-07-07761-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7761

JAMES A. CALHOUN-EL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GARY D. MAYNARD, Acting Secretary , Department

of Public Safety and Correctional Services;

OFFICER BROWN; OFFICER OABOEIU; OFFICER

LASANE; OFFICER EBAHA; ROWLEY, Commissioner of

Correction; MOTTI MULLETTA, M.D.; CRAIG

HARBOUR, Regional Manager; JAMES SMITH,

Warden; WHATTAKER, Chief of Security; CAPTAIN

SIMPSON; CAPTAIN WASHINGTON; CAPTAIN STAFER;

CAPTAIN GUY; LIEUTENANT J. WILLIAMS;

LIEUTENANT M. WILLIAMS; LIEUTENANT WATKINS;

LIEUTENANT BROWN; LIEUTENANT COLEMAN; SERGEANT

MASON; SERGEANT WALKER; OFFICER COLEMAN, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(1:07-cv-00220-RDB)

Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 27, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 07-7761 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/27/2008 Pg: 1 of 3
- 2 -

James A. Calhoun-El, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland;

Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 07-7761 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/27/2008 Pg: 2 of 3
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

James Calhoun-El appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Calhoun-El v. Maynard, No. 1:07-cv-00220-RDB (D. Md. filed Nov. 19,

2007 & entered Nov. 20, 2007). We deny Calhoun-El’s motion to

appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 07-7761 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/27/2008 Pg: 3 of 3