Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01016/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01016-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

ELIZABETH SALVESON, State Bar #83788 Chief Labor Attorney 

JONATHAN ROLNICK, State Bar #151814 

ROSE-ELLEN H. FAIRGRIEVE, State Bar #181257 

Deputy City Attorneys 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 5th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3845 

Facsimile: (415) 554-4248 

E-Mail: rose-ellen.fairgrieve@sfgov.org 

Attorneys For Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

Mary J. Shea, Esq. (SBN 113222) 

SHEA LAW OFFICES 

425 Market Street, Suite 2200 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 510-208-4422 

Fax: 415-520-9407 

shealaw@aol.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SUSAN ROLOVICH, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA, A 

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. C 07-1016 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 

SERVICE AND EXTENDING RULE 26 

MUTUAL DISCLOSURE DEADLINE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Susan Rolovich, et al. and 

Defendant City and County of San Francisco (the "City") as follows: 

 1 

Stip. & Order re Service & Answer, USDC Case No. C07-1016 n:\labor\li2007\071466\00433652.doc 

Case 4:07-cv-01016-PJH Document 25 Filed 08/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The deadline for the Rule 26 Disclosure set by the Court pursuant to a prior Court Order be 

continued thirty (30) days from August 23, 2007 to September 22, 2007 

The Reasons for the Requested Enlargement or Shortening of Time: Plaintiffs request 

the additional time to ensure that they will have all information available to meaningfully respond 

as the summer holidays had impeded some progress in this regard; 

Previous Time Modifications: There a has been one previous time modifications in the 

case by Court order – before Defendant appeared in the case -- pursuant to Ex Parte Application of 

the Plaintiffs; and 

Effect on the Schedule for the Case: The requested time modification would have no 

appreciable effect on the schedule for the case. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: August 23, 2007 DENNIS J. HERRERA 

 City Attorney 

 JONATHAN ROLNICK 

 ROSE-ELLEN H. FAIRGRIEVE 

 Deputy City Attorneys 

 By:___________/s/__________________ 

 ROSE-ELLEN H. FAIRGRIEVE 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

 FRANCISCO 

SHEA LAW OFFICES 

Dated: August 21, 2007 By:___________/s/__________________ 

 MARY J. SHEA 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 

SO ORDERED: 

Dated:____________ _________________________________________ 

 JUDGE JEFFREY S. WHITE 

 2 

 United States District Court

Stip. & Order re Service & Answer, USDC Case No. C07-1016 n:\labor\li2007\071466\00433652.doc 

August 29, 2007

Case 4:07-cv-01016-PJH Document 25 Filed 08/29/07 Page 2 of 2