Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-06591/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-06591-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

N

R

he

the

jud

Da

ETFLIX, IN

v. 

ROVI CORP

This ac

ard and the

it is Or

that de

e patents-in

dgment of n

IT IS S

ated: July 1

N

NC., 

Plaintiff, 

PORATION

Defendan

ction came 

e court havi

rdered and A

eclaratory ju

n-suit, and t

non-infringe

SO ORDER

15, 2015 

UNITED 

NORTHER

, et al., 

ts. 

on for hear

ing granted

Adjudged 

udgment is 

that the rem

ement are d

RED. 

STATES D

RN DISTRIC

ring before 

d Netflix’s m

entered in 

maining clai

dismissed a

__

PH

Un

DISTRICT C

CT OF CAL

Case No.

JUDGMEN

the court, a

motion for su

favor of Ne

ms for infri

as moot. 

__________

HYLLIS J. H

nited States

COURT 

LIFORNIA 

11-cv-6591

NT 

and the iss

ummary jud

etflix on its c

ngement a

__________

HAMILTON

s District Ju

1 PJH 

ues having

dgment, 

claim of inv

nd for decla

__________

udge 

g been duly 

validity of 

aratory 

_______ 

Case 4:11-cv-06591-PJH Document 172 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 1