Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07930/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07930-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENDALL PAGE, et al.,

Plaintiffs

 v.

BAYER CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants /

No. C 06-7930 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT

BAYER CORPORATION TO LODGE

CHAMBERS COPIES IN COMPLIANCE

WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On January 23, 2007, defendant Bayer Corporation (“Bayer”) electronically filed its

“Unopposed Motion to Stay Pretrial Proceedings Pending Transfer to Multidistrict

Proceeding and Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Pretrial Deadlines and Incorporated

Memorandum of Law.” Also, on January 23, 2007, Bayer electronically filed its “Certificate

of Interested Entities or Parties.” Bayer has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on

the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy

of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly

marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See

General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Bayer is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Case 3:06-cv-07930-MMC Document 8 Filed 01/31/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

documents. Bayer is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the Court’s

Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court

may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 31, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-07930-MMC Document 8 Filed 01/31/07 Page 2 of 2