Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04880/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04880-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THERANOS INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

BECTON DICKINSON AND COMPANY,

Defendant. /

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.

 /

No. C 14-04880 WHA

ORDER RE STIPULATION RE

APRIL 21 ORDER

An April 21 order required the parties to meet-and-confer in person in this district in a

good faith effort to fully resolve their discovery dispute (Dkt. No. 41). On April 27, the parties

filed a stipulation to vacate the April 21 order because “the open issues with [Becton Dickinson

and Company’s] disclosures have been resolved” (Dkt. No. 42). Accordingly, the parties seek

to be relieved from the order to meet-and-confer in person and to file a joint status statement by

April 30.

This order hereby RELIEVES the parties of the requirement to meet-and-confer in person

regarding the letter, dated April 16, 2015, and the requirement to file a joint status statement by

April 30. Going forward, please remember that both sides must meet-and-confer in person or

telephonically in a good faith effort to resolve the discovery dispute before filing a three-page

discovery letter. The discovery letter, dated April 16, 2015, is hereby DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-04880-WHA Document 43 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 1