Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00016/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00016-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM CROWDER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

R.A. GAULDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-00016-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 12)

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS

SHEPPARD-BROOKS AND FINLEY

FROM ACTION

Plaintiff William Crowder (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On October 5, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. To date,

plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:06-cv-00016-LJO -SMS Document 17 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of

this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the

record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 5, 2006,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s complaint, filed

January 6, 2006, against defendant Gaulden under section 1983 for

violating plaintiff’s right to privacy by revealing plaintiff’s

medical information; and,

3. Defendants Sheppard-Brooks and Finley are DISMISSED from

this action based on plaintiff’s failure to state any claims upon

which relief may be granted against them under section 1983.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 28, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00016-LJO -SMS Document 17 Filed 11/29/06 Page 2 of 2