Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00583/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00583-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION

CORPORATION,

NO. CIV. S-05-583 LKK/GGH

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL O R D E R

UTILITY DISTRICT, a municipal

utility district; and UTILITY

ENGINEERING CORPORATION, a

Texas corporation,

Defendants.

 /

SMUD’s motion to stay is DENIED as there are no new grounds

for reconsideration of the previous order denying stay. The motion

is denied without prejudice but the court will view with great

skepticism any renewed motion to stay not founded upon substantial

new evidence and the court will impose sanctions if it is forced

to review a clearly meritless renewal. 

////

////

////

Case 2:05-cv-00583-LKK -GGH Document 122 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

As discussed at argument, the motion for continuation of the

trial date has been referred to Magistrate Judge Hollows for

further proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 12, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:05-cv-00583-LKK -GGH Document 122 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2