Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00536/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00536-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

On March 18, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice

of Defendant William Tiller.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

OREGON PARK SENIOR APARTMENTS

COOPERATIVE, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-00536 JSW

ORDER RE MOTION TO

VALIDATE ELECTION

AND INSTRUCTIONS TO OPSA

DEFENDANTS

Now before the Court is a motion styled “motion for hearing in opposition to application

for appointment of temporary receiver and validate [sic] March 28, 2015 election of board of

directors,” brought by Defendants Juanita Edington, Kevin Wiggins, Dale Anders, William

Tiller,1 and Kenneth AKA Aja Feseah Jackson (“the Pro Se Defendants”). On March 25, 2015,

the Court issued an Order related to Defendants’ Oregon Park Senior Apartments Cooperative,

Douglas Butler, and Andre Nibbs (“the OPSA Defendants”) motion to appoint a receiver. In

that Order, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer regarding the identity of any

receiver, and to submit a mutually agreeable suggestion to the Court by no later than April 3,

2015. 

By this motion, the Pro Se Defendants ask the Court to validate the election of a new

Board of Directors on March 28, 2015. Given that the proposed election date has passed, there

is no factual basis on which the Court could grant this motion. Moreover, the Pro Se

Case 3:15-cv-00536-LB Document 91 Filed 03/31/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants provide no legal basis on which the Court could enter an order in this matter. 

Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

However, the Court reminds both groups of Defendants that they are still ORDERED to

meet and confer regarding the identity of a neutral receiver. If the parties can agree upon such a

person, they are ORDERED to submit a proposed order to that effect by no later than April 3,

2015, as stated in the prior Order. The Court further clarifies that, if the parties are unable to

reach agreement, they must file a document to that effect with the Court by no later than April

3, 2015. Because the Pro Se Defendants are not e-filers the OPSA Defendants are ORDERED

to serve this Order on the Pro Se Defendants by hand, and file a proof of service with the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31, 2015 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-00536-LB Document 91 Filed 03/31/15 Page 2 of 2