Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03020/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03020-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation After Status Conference; Order C04-03020-MJJ

STEVEN M. WOODSIDE #58684

County Counsel

ANNE L. KECK #136315

Deputy County Counsel

County of Sonoma

575 Administration Dr., Rm. 105

Santa Rosa, California 95403-2815

Telephone: (707) 565-2421

Fax: (707) 565-2624

Attorneys for Defendant

 BILL COGBILL, in his official capacity of 

 Sheriff of the County of Sonoma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAY HRDLICKA, an individual; CRIME,

JUSTICE & AMERICA, INC., a California

Corporation; and RAUL PABLO, TERRY

RIDEOUT, individuals on behalf of

themselves and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

BILL COGBILL, in his official capacity of

Sheriff of the County of Sonoma.

Defendant.

/

No. C04-03020-MJJ

STIPULATION AFTER STATUS

CONFERENCE; ORDER

A status conference was held in this matter before the Court on May 17, 2005. 

Attorney James Wheaton appeared at the status conference on behalf of Plaintiffs, and

Deputy County Counsel Anne L. Keck appeared on behalf of Defendant. During the status

conference and at an informal meeting thereafter, the parties agreed and stipulated to the

following matters:

1. Plaintiffs no longer seek to certify this lawsuit as a class action, and withdraw

all allegations contained in the First Amended Complaint that request and support a class

action suit.

Case 3:04-cv-03020-MJJ Document 58 Filed 06/08/2005 Page 1 of 3

Granted

Case 3:04-cv-03020-MJJ Document 59 Filed 06/13/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation After Status Conference; Order C04-03020-MJJ

2. By virtue of the Court’s Order Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction,

entered on April 13, 2005 (“Order”), Plaintiff Terry Rideout was dismissed from the case. 

Plaintiffs seek to dismiss Plaintiff Raul Pablo from the case as well.

3. By filing an answer in this matter, Defendant does not waive any defenses or

other issues which might have been raised in a motion to dismiss. Such defenses or issues

are hereby preserved to be adjudicated in the future, if necessary.

4. Defendant does not waive any issue that could have been raised in a motion for

reconsideration with respect to the Order. Such issues are hereby preserved to be adjudicated

in the future, if necessary.

5. The parties intend to proceed with cross-motions for summary judgment. At

the status conference, the Court set the hearing on such motions for September 20, 2005, at

9:30 am. The Court requested that all the briefing on such motions be concluded at least

three weeks prior to the hearing date, but left the remainder of the briefing dates to be

resolved by the parties. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to the following briefing

due dates:

Item Due Date

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment July 1, 2005

Defendant’s Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment July 27, 2005

Plaintiff’s Reply and Opposition to Cross-Motion August 16, 2005

Defendant’s Reply re Cross Motion August 30, 2005

6. The parties have demonstrated cooperativeness in creating and executing a

discovery plan, and shall continue to proceed with any necessary discovery.

Respectfully submitted,

STEVEN M. WOODSIDE, County Counsel

Dated: June 1, 2005 By: s/ Anne L. Keck Anne L. Keck

Deputy County Counsel

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 3:04-cv-03020-MJJ Document 58 Filed 06/08/2005 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:04-cv-03020-MJJ Document 59 Filed 06/13/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Stipulation After Status Conference; Order C04-03020-MJJ

FIRST AMENDMENT PROJECT

Dated: June 8, 2005 By: /s/ James Wheaton

David Greene

Attorneys for Plaintiff

* * *

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

1. The foregoing stipulation of the parties is approved, and the above-stated

briefing schedule is adopted by the Court.

2. This case will not proceed as a class action, and all class action allegations

contained in the First Amended Complaint will be deemed stricken.

3. Plaintiff Raul Pablo is hereby dismissed from this action without prejudice.

Dated: _______________ 

Honorable Martin J. Jenkins

District Court Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03020-MJJ Document 58 Filed 06/08/2005 Page 3 of 3

6/13/2005 /s/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

Case 3:04-cv-03020-MJJ Document 59 Filed 06/13/05 Page 3 of 3