Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00727/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00727-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIEM HIEU LE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF PITTSBURG,

Defendant. /

No. C 08-727 SI

 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This matter came on for a regularly-scheduled case management conference on Friday, August

1, 2008. Defendant was present through counsel, but plaintiff did not appear, nor did plaintiff contact

the Court in any way concerning his absence. Further, by order dated July 9, 2008, plaintiff’s complaint

was dismissed with leave to amend by July 18, 2008. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, nor

did he contact the Court in any way concerning an extension of that deadline.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause, in writing filed with the Court and served on

opposing counsel no later than August 18, 2008, why he failed to appear; why he failed to file an

amended complaint by July 18, 2008; and whether he intends to continue with this action

In the event an adequate response is not provided by August 18, 2008, this action may be

dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 1, 2008 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00727-SI Document 17 Filed 08/01/08 Page 1 of 1