Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00666/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00666-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MARCUS R. ELLINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

E. S. ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

02:04-CV-0666 DFL KJM P

ORDER

On May 24, 2006, Defendants filed a request to act in excess of time, nunc pro tunc, to

respond to Plaintiff’s interrogatories (Dr. Rohlfing), Plaintiff’s First Set of Admissions (Dr.

Rohlfing) and Plaintiff’s First Set of Requests for Production. They explain that Plaintiff

mistakenly included or otherwise attached the discovery as if exhibits to an opposition to an

earlier motion, rather than serving it separately.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendants are granted thirty days from the date of this order

to serve their responses to Plaintiff’s discovery. Plaintiff is granted fifteen days from the receipt

of Defendants’ discovery responses to address such discovery. For all other discovery matters, 

June 16, 2006, shall remain the discovery deadline.

Dated: May 25, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 92 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 1