Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00876/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00876-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (SBN #074414) 

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

1832-A Capitol Street 

Vallejo, CA 94590

Telephone: (415) 444-5800

Facsimile: (415) 674-9900

Email: tfrankovich@disabilitieslaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff 

BYRON CHAPMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BYRON CHAPMAN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MUNIRS COMPANY, et al., 

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-00876-KJM-EFB

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED ORDER THERON

Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan

The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through

their designated counsel that the above-captioned action become and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice and each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over

enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994)

--------]

----------

Case 2:14-cv-00876-KJM-EFB Document 25 Filed 11/19/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER -2-

(empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement

agreements).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: November 11, 2015 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

 By: /s/ Thomas E. Frankovich 

Thomas E. Frankovich

 Attorney for Plaintiff BYRON CHAPMAN

Dated: November 11, 2015 MICHAEL WELCH ASSOCIATES 

By: /s/ Michael Welch Michael Welch

Attorney for Defendant Munirs Company

Dated: November 11, 2015 LELAND, PARACHINI, STEINBERG,

MATZGER & MELNICK, LLP 

By: /s/ Steven H.Bovarnick 

Steven H. Bovarnick

Attorney for Defendant JOE A. KOOPMAN AND

ESTHER L. KOOPMAN FAMILY

PARTNERSHIP 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2) and each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. IT IS FURTHER

ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the parties’

Settlement Agreement and General Release should such enforcement be necessary.

 Dated: _____________, 2015

 

Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

November 19 ----------

Case 2:14-cv-00876-KJM-EFB Document 25 Filed 11/19/15 Page 2 of 2