Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00332/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00332-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY LUCKEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

VISALIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:13-cv-00332-AWI-SAB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

ECF NO. 47, 50

On February 5, 2015, Plaintiff Timothy Luckey (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for summary 

judgment. (ECF No. 47.) On February 24, 2015, the magistrate judge assigned to this action 

issued a Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for summary 

judgment be denied. (ECF No. 50.)

The Findings and Recommendations contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within thirty (30) days. On March 11, 2015, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Objections to 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” However, therein, Plaintiff acknowledges 

that he does not fully understand the Court’s local rules and procedures. Plaintiff’s filing does 

not set forth any legal objection to the Findings and Recommendation and instead consists of a 

recitation of facts by Plaintiff and an excerpt from a deposition transcript.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 

a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 

Case 1:13-cv-00332-AWI-SAB Document 52 Filed 04/01/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The February 24, 2015 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN 

FULL; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED (ECF No. 47).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00332-AWI-SAB Document 52 Filed 04/01/15 Page 2 of 2