Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-02466/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-02466-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 355
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 09cv2466

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRACE L. SANDOVAL,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 09cv2466 JM(JMA)

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

vs. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

BENJAMIN CERVANTES,

Defendant.

Over the past several years, Plaintiff Grace L. Sandoval has filed in excess of 90 separate

actions in this district. 08cv1297, 08cv1621, 08cv1622, 08cv1623, 08cv1848, 08cv1849, 08cv1853,

98cv1854, 08cv1868, 08cv1869, 08cv1870, 08cv1944, 08cv2004, 08cv2005, 08cv2057, 08cv2104,

08cv2105, 08cv2151, 09cv0269, 09cv0422, 09cv423, 09cv0424, 09cv0437, 09cv0438, 09cv0441,

09cv0454, 09cv0455, 09cv0456, 09cv0474, 09cv0475, 09cv0476, 09cv0477, 09cv0478, 09cv0491,

09cv0492, 09cv0493, 09cv0494, 09cv0495, 09cv582, 09cv0583, 09cv585, 09cv586, 09cv0588,

09cv0600, 09cv0642, 09cv1232, 09cv1506, 09cv1506, 09cv1507, 09cv1508, 09cv1514, 09cv1515,

09cv1520, 09cv1524, 09cv1526, 09cv1849, 09cv2122, 09cv2141, 09cv2148, 09cv2204, 09cv2205,

09cv2206, 09cv2217, 09cv2218, 09cv2217, 09cv2218, 09cv2244, 09cv2245, 09cv2250, 09cv2251,

09cv2252, 09cv2304, 09cv2305, 09cv2306, 09cv2307, 09cv2308, 09cv2309, 09cv2310, 09cv2311,

09cv2312, 09cv2313, 09cv2450, 09cv2452, 09cv2453, 09cv2462,09cv2463, 09cv2464, 09cv2465,

09cv2466, 09cv2467. Each action was brought in propria persona and in forma pauperis. Each

appears to have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. The present complaint fairs

Case 3:09-cv-02466-JM-JMA Document 4 Filed 11/10/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 09cv2466

no better. 

Without identifying the basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the complaint sets forth

a rambling narrative of charges and conclusions concerning, for example, attempts to take her

mother’s blood, drug trafficking, theft of money from her mother, illegal aliens, damage to her car,

and other nefarious acts. As the present complaint, like the scores of previously filed complaints, fails

to identify any basis for federal jurisdiction, or to set forth a coherent statement of her claims, the court

dismisses the complaint at bar as frivolous, for failure to state a claim, and for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction.

The Clerk of Court is instructed to dismiss the action without prejudice. Until Plaintiff pays

the filing fee or demonstrates an imminent danger of serious physical injury, the Clerk of Court is

instructed to reject for filing any further documents from Plaintiff in this case. The court also denies

Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 10, 2009

 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller

 United States District Judge

cc: All parties

Case 3:09-cv-02466-JM-JMA Document 4 Filed 11/10/09 Page 2 of 2