Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00132/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00132-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE VIZCAINO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0132 MCE KJM PS

vs.

SUPREME COURT OF GUAM,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed May 3, 2005, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On August 23, 2005, plaintiff was granted a

thirty day extension of time. On August 29, 2005, plaintiff filed a document entitled “Federal

Reentry,” which does not comply with the court’s May 3, 2005 order. The time for filing an

amended complaint has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

Case 2:05-cv-00132-MCE -KJM Document 15 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 25, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Vizc0132.fta

Case 2:05-cv-00132-MCE -KJM Document 15 Filed 10/26/05 Page 2 of 2