Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-mc-00005/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-mc-00005-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 999
Nature of Suit: 
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH R. FREITAS, )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

)

DIRECTOR, INTERNAL REVENUE )

SERVICE, )

)

)

Defendant. )

)

)

No. MISC. F-04-005

ORDER

The court has received a letter from plaintiff dated April

26, 2005, asserting that it is his "right to compel/demand that

you prove that 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) and Rule 77-121© [sic) are laws

made by the people, laws which were consented to them prior to

their being promulgated." It is apparent that plaintiff is

referring to the court's Order filed on May 20, 2004.

The court refers plaintiff to its prior Order. Plaintiff

must pay the filing fee or filed a sufficient application to

Case 1:04-mc-00005 Document 7 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1The filing fee has been increased to $250, effective February

7, 2005.

2

proceed in forma pauperis.1 

The court further advises plaintiff that the court will not

address this issue further. The court has made its ruling. The

court will disregard any further letters, pleadings or other

communications to the court from plaintiff challenging this

ruling. As the court stated in its May 20, 2004 Order, if

plaintiff disagrees with the court's orders, he may present his

position to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 2, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-mc-00005 Document 7 Filed 05/03/05 Page 2 of 2