Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-00817/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-00817-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Robert David Baker, Esq. (87314)

ROBERT DAVID BAKER, INC.

80 South White Road

San Jose, CA 95127

(408) 251-3400

facsimile: (408) 251-3401

rbaker@rdblaw.net

Attorney for Plaintiff,

CHARLES LOFT

STEWART WEINBERG, Bar No. 031493

KRISTINA L. HILLMAN, Bar No. 208599

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200

Alameda, California 94501

Telephone (510) 337-1001

Fax (510) 337-1023

E-Mail: sweinberg@unioncounsel.net

khillman@unioncounsel.net

Attorneys for Defendant 

STATIONARY ENGINEERS, LOCAL 39

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CHARLES LOFT,

 Plaintiff, v.

STATIONARY ENGINEERS, LOCAL 39, 

PTF, LLC,

 Defendant.

____________________________________/

CASE NO. C 14-00817 LHK

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING 

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; FRCP RULE 

41(a)(1)(ii).

Whereas, Defendant Stationary Engineers, Local 39 and Plaintiff Charles Loft have

entered into a settlement of the above-entitled matter;

Whereas, the trial date in this matter is scheduled for June 15, 2015;

Loft v. Stationary Engineers, Local 39; Case No. 14-00817 LHK

Stipulation to Dismiss Action; FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(ii)

1

Case 5:14-cv-00817-LHK Document 106 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Whereas the Court denied the Parties’ motion to vacate the trial date until a dismissal of 

the above-entitled matter is file;

Whereas there are material terms of the settlement agreement that have not yet been 

performed;

THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the above-entitled matter be dismissed with prejudice.

2. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the settlement agreement to ensure the 

performance of all terms of the settlement agreement and the terms of the settlement 

agreement are hereby incorporated in this dismissal. K.C. ex rel. Erica C. v. 

Torlakson, 762 F.3d 963, 965-68 ( 9th Cir. 2014).

IT IS SO STIPULATED

Dated: June 9, 2015 Dated: June 9, 2015

________/s/___________ ________/s/____________

Robert David Baker, Esq. Kristina Hillman, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation of the Parties, and for good cause appearing, the Court 

retains jurisdiction over performance of the terms of the settlement agreement between the 

Parties, and this matter is dismissed with prejudice

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June __, 2015

_________________

Hon. Lucy H. Koh

Loft v. Stationary Engineers, Local 39; Case No. 14-00817 LHK

Stipulation to Dismiss Action; FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(ii)

2

The Clerk shall close the file. 10

Case 5:14-cv-00817-LHK Document 106 Filed 06/10/15 Page 2 of 2