Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ATOPTECH, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 13-2965 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF

DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH

CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On January 27, 2015, defendant electronically filed a document titled “Answer to

Amended Complaint and Counterclaims.” Defendant has violated the Civil Local Rules of

this District and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a

paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See

Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable

Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the

Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the abovereferenced document. Defendant is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply

with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed

document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the

record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely

provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 2, 2015 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 213 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 1