Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03845/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03845-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Raymond Borst, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph M. Arpaio, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV05-3845-PHX-SRB

ORDER

Plaintiff, Raymond Borst, filed his Civil Rights Complaint on November 29, 2005.

On March 30, 2006, this Court issued an order advising Plaintiff to complete and return a

service packet for Defendant by April 19, 2006. On April 5, 2006, Plaintiff's copy of the

March 30, 2006 order sent to his address in the county jail was returned by the Post Office

with the notation"Released." On April 17, 2006, the Court issued an order giving Plaintiff

until April 21, 2006 to show cause why his case should not be dismissed. As of the date of

this order Plaintiff has not responded to any of the Court's orders and all of his mail has been

returned. Research on the Arizona Department of Corrections website has not shown

Plaintiff to be a current inmate.

On May 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation

recommending that this case be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to comply with Court orders

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Case 2:05-cv-03845-SRB Document 10 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The

Court notes that on May 25, 2006 Plaintiff's copy of the Report and Recommendation was

also returned by the Post Office.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case without prejudice

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter Judgment accordingly.

DATED this 12th day of June, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03845-SRB Document 10 Filed 06/13/06 Page 2 of 2