Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00742/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00742-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL KLEIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

C. MILLER, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:15-CV-00742 DAD DLB PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO 

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO 

STATE A CLAIM

(FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE)

Plaintiff Michael Klein (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner in the custody of the California 

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this 

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On March 7, 2016, the Court issued a screening order dismissing the complaint with 

leave to amend for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint 

within (30) days. Over thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to comply. Plaintiff was 

advised that failure to file an amended complaint within the allotted time would result in 

dismissal for failure to state a claim.

RECOMMENDATION

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. 

Case 1:15-cv-00742-DAD-DLB Document 13 Filed 04/20/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 

(14) days after date of service of these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written 

objections with the Court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 19, 2016 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00742-DAD-DLB Document 13 Filed 04/20/16 Page 2 of 2