Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-03105/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-03105-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

PRENTICE|LONG,PC

Margaret E. Long – SBN 227176

2240 Court Street

Redding, CA 96001

Telephone: (530) 691-0800

Facsimile: (530) 691-0700

E-Mail: margaret@prenticelongpc.com

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF PLUMAS

and GREGORY HAGWOOD and APRIL GOTT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIFFANY WAGNER, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF PLUMAS; BRANDON 

COMPTON, in his individual and official 

capacities, GREGORY HAGWOOD, in his 

individual and official capacities; and 

DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

These answering 

Defendants.

No. 2:18-CV-03105-KJM-DB

STIPULATION REGARDING 

ANTICIPATED DISPOSITIVE MOTION; 

FURTHER SCHEDULING DATES; 

PROPOSED ORDER THEREON

This court’s Order filed March 25, 2020 (ECF 37) provides that any dispositive 

motion shall be calendared to be heard no later than January 25, 2021, and provides for other 

subsequent dates keyed to that law and motion cutoff date. The parties have proceeded diligently 

in discovery; but, owing to the various logistical constraints imposed by the current COVID 

pandemic, as well as the fires that have been visited upon Plumas County, the parties have taken 

more time than contemplated by the Order to complete the discovery necessarily antecedent to 

filing and opposing such a motion and in proceeding with the subsequent actions. Moreover, the 

parties agree on a desire to minimize the efforts necessary during the upcoming holiday season to 

Case 2:18-cv-03105-KJM-DB Document 44 Filed 10/06/20 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

file, oppose, and consider the motions Defendants contemplate. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this matter, 

that the following datesin the Scheduling Order are amended:

Expert Witness Disclosures: from March 12, 2021 to May 12, 2021;

Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures: from March 26, 2021 to May 26, 2021;

Expert Witness Discovery Cutoff: from April 24, 2021 to June 24, 2021; and

Dispositive Motions heard no later than: from January 25, 2021 to March 26, 2021. 

Notwithstanding the provisions of Local Rule 230(b), any motion for summary judgment or 

motion for summary adjudication of issues will be filed 35 days before the noticed hearing date.

Dated: September 28, 2020 PRENTICE|LONG, PC

__________/s/___Margaret Long____________

MARGARET LONG

Attorneys for Defendants County of Plumas and 

Gregory Hagwood and April Gott

Dated: September 28, 2020

_/S/ Joseph Maloney, authorized 9-28-20_____

JOSEPH E. MALONEY

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: September 28, 2020 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF

_ /S/ Serana Warner, authorized 9-28-20______

SERENA M. WARNER

Attorney for Defendant Compton

Case 2:18-cv-03105-KJM-DB Document 44 Filed 10/06/20 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

ORDER

The court GRANTS the parties’ request to adjust the Amended Scheduling Order, ECF No. 

37, dates as follows:

• Expert Witness Disclosures: from March 12, 2021 to May 12, 2021;

• Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures: from March 26, 2021 to May 26, 2021;

• Expert Witness Discovery Cutoff: from April 24, 2021 to June 24, 2021; and

• Dispositive Motions heard no later than: from January 25, 2021 to March 26, 2021.

This order resolves ECF No. 43.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 6, 2020. 

Case 2:18-cv-03105-KJM-DB Document 44 Filed 10/06/20 Page 3 of 3