Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01523/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01523-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - 1

2:06-cv-1523-RRB-KJM PS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. 2:06-CV-1523-RRB-KJM PS

ORDER

Plaintiff Carlos Espino (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se,

filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-

302(c)(21).

On November 29, 2006, Magistrate Judge Kimberly J.

Mueller filed Findings and Recommendations (Docket 24) herein,

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all

parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations

were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has filed Objections

to the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendations at Docket 25.

CARLOS ESPINO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.,

et al.,

Defendants.

Case 2:06-cv-01523-RRB -KJM Document 29 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - 2

2:06-cv-1523-RRB-KJM PS

Inasmuch as the Court concludes the issues before it are

based in law, i.e., legal disputes, and in accordance with the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, the

Court has conducted a de novo review of the relevant pleadings

filed in this matter. Having carefully and thoroughly reviewed the

same, the court finds the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendations

(Docket 24) to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations (Docket 24) filed

on November 29, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss at Docket 9 is

GRANTED; and

3. This action is dismissed with prejudice.

ENTERED this 21st day of June, 2007.

S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01523-RRB -KJM Document 29 Filed 06/21/07 Page 2 of 2