Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-00589/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-00589-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cedric Jordan, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Warden Bernie Ellis, et al.,

Respondent(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-05-589-PHX-DGC (ECV)

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Petitioner Cedric Jordan’s petition for writ of habeas

corpus and United States Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss’s Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”). Docs. ##1, 12. The R&R recommends that the Court deny the petition. Doc. #12

at 4. 

The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had ten days to file objections to

the R&R and that the failure to timely file objections to any determination of the Magistrate

Judge would be considered a waiver of the right to review of such determination. Id. at 4-5

(citing [28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d

1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)]). The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court

of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any

issue that is not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (“The district judge . .

. shall make a de novo determination . . . of any portion of the magistrate judge’s disposition

Case 2:05-cv-00589-DGC Document 13 Filed 04/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

to which specific written objection has been made[.]”). The Court will accept the R&R and

deny the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept,

reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the

magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (same).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss’s R&R (Doc. #12) is accepted/denied.

2. Petitioner Cedric Jordan’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. #1) is

denied.

3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.

DATED this 19th day of April, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-00589-DGC Document 13 Filed 04/20/06 Page 2 of 2