Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-01117/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-01117-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN MCARDLE,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 09-cv-01117-CW (TSH)

DISCOVERY ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 367

The Court held a telephonic hearing this morning concerning the parties’ joint discovery 

letter brief at ECF No. 367. Judge Wilken’s minute order provides that fact discovery closes four 

months after the rulings from the Ninth Circuit. ECF No. 358. The Court explained that this 

means four months after the mandate issues from the Ninth Circuit. At the hearing, AT&T stated 

it would answer interrogatories 10-13 within 30 days. In the letter brief, AT&T stated it would 

produce documents in response to the requests for production (“RFPs”) other than 69-71 and 81. 

The discussion at the hearing therefore focused mostly on these RFPs. For the reasons discussed 

on the record, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. AT&T shall produce anonymized records showing all California customers who 

were charged for one-minute incoming or outgoing international roaming calls during the class 

period, the date of each call, and the amount charged for each call, except for customers who 

received refunds or credits that offset these charges. AT&T shall start this production within 30 

days and finish it within 75 days. If the mandate issues soon, the Court may need to revisit the 

timing of this production.

2. Plaintiff’s motion to compel as to RFP 81 is DENIED because it exceeds the scope 

Case 4:09-cv-01117-CW Document 372 Filed 09/26/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

of discovery that Judge Wilken authorized while the Ninth Circuit rulings are pending (see ECF 

No. 358).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2019

THOMAS S. HIXSON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:09-cv-01117-CW Document 372 Filed 09/26/19 Page 2 of 2