Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00082/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-00082-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

*E-FILED 8/22/05*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DENIZ BOLBOL, ET AL., 

Plaintiffs,

 v.

HP PAVILION MANAGEMENT, ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

NO. 5:04-cv-00082 JW (RS)

ORDER RESCHEDULING 

STATUS CONFERENCE 

On June 22, 2005, the Court informed counselthat, due to the pendency of the remaining claims filed

by the other plaintiffs in the case, the motion for attorneys' fees filed by attorney Kirk Boyd would be

determined after the conclusion ofthe trial in this matter, which was then scheduled to commence on July 26,

2005. Based on that trial date, the Court scheduled a status conference withall counselon August 25, 2005.

Since that time, however, the presiding judge continued the trial, which is now set to begin on January 10,

2006. Accordingly, on August 3, 2005, the Court received a request from defense counsel to reset the August

conference to a date followingthe conclusionoftrial. Attorney Boyd, by letter dated August 8, 2005, opposed

the request to move the conference. In response, counsel for HP PavilionManagement stated his willingness

to attend the conference, but also noted his understanding that the motion for attorneys' fees would not be

resolved at the conference. 

Based on the foregoing, and forthe reasons enunciated by the Court at the hearing on June 22, 2005

Case 5:04-cv-00082-JW Document 157 Filed 08/22/05 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

and inits prior order, the status conference is reset from August 25, 2005 to February 16, 2006 at 2:30 p.m.

to address the outcome of the trial and its relation to the pending fee request. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 8/22/05 /s/ Richard Seeborg 

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:04-cv-00082-JW Document 157 Filed 08/22/05 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Lizbeth Brown lizbethbrown@aol.com, 

Shannon N. Cogan shannon.cogan@berliner.com, rr@berliner.com 

Marwa Elzankaly melzankaly@mfmlaw.com, prussell@mfmlaw.com 

Nora Valerie Frimann cao.main@sanjoseca.gov, Brande.Gex@sanjoseca.gov 

Christine L. Garcia christine@animalattorney.com 

G. Whitney Leigh wleigh@gonzalezleigh.com,

kxa@kvn.com;bdl@kvn.com;malberto@gonzalezleigh.com 

James McManis jmcmanis@mfmlaw.com, smaes@mfmlaw.com 

Thomas P. Murphy tpm@berliner.com 

Nima Nami nimanami@hotmail.com, malberto@gonzalezleigh.com 

Jessica Valenzuela Santamaria jvalenzuelasantamaria@mfmlaw.com, smaes@mfmlaw.com 

Rosa Tsongtaatarii , Esq Rosa.tsongtaatarii@ci.sj.ca.us, 

Frank R. Ubhaus fru@berliner.com, cep@berliner.com 

Dated: 8/22/05 Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg

By: /s/ BAK 

Case 5:04-cv-00082-JW Document 157 Filed 08/22/05 Page 3 of 3