Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL MANRIQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

HUCHINS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00456-LJO-BAM PC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S STATEMENT OF

DISCOVERY NEEDED

(ECF No. 184)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Daniel Manriquez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 13, 2012, an order

issued denying Plaintiff’s sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth motions to compel and directing the

parties to file statements of discovery needed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed a statement of

discovery needed on February 14, 2012. (ECF No 184.) Defendants have failed to file a response

to Plaintiff’s statement. 

The Court shall order that Defendants file a response within thirty days. The Court is

cognizant that Defendants have not complied with prior orders to respond to motions to compel and

notes that when Defendants’ have filed a response to Plaintiff’s motions to compel, they have been

devoid of any attempt to address the issues raised byPlaintiff in the motions. Defendants are advised

that the response must address the substance of each of Plaintiff’s requests and failure to comply

with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions on defendants, including any and all

sanctions available under Rule 37.

///

1

Case 1:09-cv-00456-BAM Document 185 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of service of

this order, Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff’s statement of discoveryneeded in compliance

with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 2, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

10c20k UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-00456-BAM Document 185 Filed 03/05/12 Page 2 of 2