Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01497/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01497-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

C 04 01497 RS 

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\NVG\2857023_1.DOC 

DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 (dkramer@wsgr.com) 

COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637 (cbal@wsgr.com) 

DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952 (dlansky@wsgr.com) 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

Google Inc. 

P. CRAIG CARDON, State Bar No. 168646 

BRIAN R. BLACKMAN, State Bar No. 196996 

KENDALL M. BURTON, State Bar No. 228720 

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4106 

Telephone: (415) 434-9100 

Facsimile: (415) 434-3947 

TIMOTHY H. KRATZ, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

LUKE ANDERSON, (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

ROBERT J. WADDELL, JR. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

MCGUIREWOODS LLP 

1170 Peachtree Street N.E., Suite 2100 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309 

Telephone: (404) 443-5500 

Facsimile: (404) 443-5751 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 

Digital Envoy, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

DIGITAL ENVOY, INC., 

 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 

v. 

GOOGLE INC., 

 Defendant/Counterclaimant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C 04 01497 RS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: AMENDING 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

)

*E-FILED 4/12/06*

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 419 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

C 04 01497 RS 

1 C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\NVG\2857023_1.DOC 

Google Inc. (“Google”) and Digital Envoy, Inc. (“Digital Envoy”) submit, through their 

counsel of record, this stipulation and proposed order to amend the Case Scheduling Order 

entered by the Court on this matter on August 27, 2004, and amended by Orders of the Court on 

October 21, 2005, December 5, 2005 and March 28, 2006. 

In light of the resolution of Digital Envoy’s claims in the action and the pendency of 

Google’s counterclaims, the parties propose these amendments to the Scheduling Order in the 

interests of efficiency and economy: 

1. EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions 

shall proceed as follows: 

a. On or before April 28, 2006, defendant shall disclose expert testimony and 

reports in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2), F.R. Civ. P. 

b. The deposition of defendant’s expert is scheduled to take place on May 16, 

2006. 

c. On or before May 19, 2006, plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony and 

reports in accordance with Rule 26(a)(2), F.R. Civ. P. 

d. The deposition of plaintiff’s expert will take place during the week of May 

22, 2006. 

e. On or before June 1, 2006, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to 

Rule 26(b)(4), F.R. Civ. P. shall be completed. 

f. The parties may serve subpoenas on the opposing party’s expert in advance 

of the deadline for that expert’s deposition, and the production of 

documents in response to such subpoena will take place on or before the 

date the expert’s deposition is to take place. The parties are not required to 

produce communications with the expert or draft reports. 

g. Any pretrial motions concerning experts must be filed by June 2, 2006, 

with any opposition due June 5, 2005 and will be deemed submitted on the 

papers. 

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 419 Filed 04/12/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

C 04 01497 RS 

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\NVG\2857023_1.DOC 2

2. In all other respects, the Scheduling Order remains in full force and effect. 

Nothing contained in the parties’ stipulation shall operate to re-open fact discovery or extend the 

period for fact discovery. Nothing in the stipulation shall prohibit any party from seeking to 

amend this or any subsequent Scheduling Order it is believes that such relief is warranted. 

Dated: April 11, 2006 MCGUIREWOODS LLP 

By: /s/ Timothy H. Kratz 

 Timothy H. Kratz 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

DIGITAL ENVOY, INC. 

Dated: April 11, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ David L. Lansky 

 David L. Lansky 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

GOOGLE INC. 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:_____________, 2006 ____________________________________

HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

April 12

XXXXXXXXXXXX

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 419 Filed 04/12/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

RE : AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

C 04 01497 RS 

C:\NrPortbl\PALIB1\NVG\2857023_1.DOC 3

CERTIFICATION

I, David L. Lansky, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file the STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: AMENDING SCHEDULING 

ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that all parties have 

concurred in this filing. 

DATED: April 11, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

 Professional Corporation 

 By: /s/ David L. Lansky 

 David L. Lansky 

 Attorneys for Defendant / Counterclaimant 

GOOGLE INC. 

Case 5:04-cv-01497-RS Document 419 Filed 04/12/06 Page 4 of 4