Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04134/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04134-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER - Case No. 5:06-CV-04134-JF 

DANIEL H. BOOKIN (S.B. #78996) 

dbookin@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

DHAIVAT H. SHAH (S.B. #196382) 

dshah@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

2765 Sand Hill Road 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 473-2600 

Facsimile: (650) 473-2601 

ALAN R. FRIEDMAN (Admitted pro hac vice)

afriedman@kramerlevin.com

JONATHAN M. WAGNER (Admitted pro hac vice)

jwagner@kramerlevin.com

NORMAN C. SIMON (Admitted pro hac vice)

nsimon@kramerlevin.com

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Telephone: (212) 715-9100 

Facsimile: (212) 715-8000 

Attorneys for Defendants 

VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY, INC., VISHAY TEMIC 

SEMICONDUCTOR ACQUISITION HOLDINGS CORPORATION, 

and FELIX D. ZANDMAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION 

REBECCA PROCTOR, REX BROOKS, 

JOHN DONOVAN, ROBERT NEEDLES, 

et al., on behalf of Siliconix, Inc., themselves, 

and on behalf of all minority shareholders 

of Siliconix, Inc. similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY, INC., 

VISHAY TEMIC SEMICONDUCTOR 

ACQUISITION HOLDINGS CORPORATION, 

SILICONIX, INC., ERNST & YOUNG, 

FELIX D. ZANDMAN, and DOES 1 through 

20, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 5:06-CV-04134-JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Judge: The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

**E-filed 10/6/06**

Case 5:06-cv-04134-JF Document 31 Filed 10/06/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER - Case No. 5:06-CV-04134-JF 

The parties submit the following stipulation regarding upcoming case management and 

discovery requirements: 

WHEREAS, plaintiffs’ motion to remand is currently scheduled to be heard on October 6, 

2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties are currently required to file a discovery plan pursuant to 

Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than October 6, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties are currently required to complete their initial disclosures 

pursuant to Rule 26(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than October 6, 2006, 

unless they object to such disclosure in their Rule 26(f) discovery plan; 

WHEREAS, the parties are required to file an ADR Certification, and either: (1) a 

stipulation selecting an ADR process; or (2) a notice of need for an ADR phone conference; 

WHEREAS, the parties are currently required to file a joint case management conference 

statement no later than October 6, 2006; 

WHEREAS, a case management conference is currently scheduled for October 13, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding the scope of the case management and discovery requirements identified in this stipulation, and agree that it would serve the 

interests of economy and efficiency to defer these requirements until resolution of plaintiffs’ 

motion to remand; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned, 

as follows: 

1. Each of the case management and discovery requirements enumerated in this 

stipulation is stayed until 14 calendar days after this Court rules on plaintiffs’ motion to remand; 

2. The case management conference that is currently scheduled for October 13, 2006, 

is continued to a date 21 calendar days after this Court rules on plaintiffs’ motion to remand, or 

as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard. 

Case 5:06-cv-04134-JF Document 31 Filed 10/06/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER - Case No. 5:06-CV-04134-JF 

Dated: October 5, 2006 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

DANIEL H. BOOKIN 

DHAIVAT H. SHAH 

By: ___________________________________ 

Dhaivat H. Shah 

- and - 

ALAN R. FRIEDMAN 

JONATHAN M. WAGNER 

NORMAN C. SIMON 

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & 

 FRANKEL LLP 

1177 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, New York 10036 

Attorneys for Defendants 

VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY, INC., 

VISHAY TEMIC SEMICONDUCTOR 

ACQUISITION HOLDINGS CORPORATION, 

and FELIX D. ZANDMAN 

Dated: October 5, 2006 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

PETER A. WALD 

PATRICK E. GIBBS 

DAVID M. FRIEDMAN 

KARLI E. SAGER 

By: ___________________________________ 

David M. Friedman 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Dated: October 5, 2006 HENNEFER & WOOD 

By: ___________________________________ 

James A. Hennefer 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

/s/ Dhaivat H. Shah 

/s/ David M. Friedman 

/s/ James A. Hennefer 

Case 5:06-cv-04134-JF Document 31 Filed 10/06/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER - Case No. 5:06-CV-04134-JF 

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE

I certify that David M. Friedman and James A. Hennefer concur in the filing of this 

document. 

Dated: October 5, 2006 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

DANIEL H. BOOKIN 

DHAIVAT H. SHAH 

By: ___________________________________ 

Dhaivat H. Shah 

ORDER 

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________ 

______________________________________ 

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

United States District Judge 

MP1:988746.1 

/s/ Dhaivat H. Shah 

10/6/06 Case Management Conference is continued until November 17 2006 at 10:30 AM.

Case 5:06-cv-04134-JF Document 31 Filed 10/06/06 Page 4 of 4