Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00241/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00241-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY 

DEADLINE FOR WITNESS DEPOSITIONS - 1 

Law Offices of Johnny L. Griffin III 

1010 F Street, Suite 200 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 444-5557

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

LAW OFFICES JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN III 

JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III (State Bar #118694) 

VICTORIA M. CIGANDA (State Bar #215719) 

1010 F Street, Suite 200 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 444-5557 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JUAN MIGUEL AGUAS 

LITTLER MENDELSON 

RICHARD R. GRAY (State Bar # 071030) 

KATY A. BOLLS (State Bar # 233596) 

2520 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 390 

Sacramento, CA 95833 

Telephone: (916) 561-5300 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LOOMIS, FARGO & CO., HARRY DENNIS 

and RICHARD HUDSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JUAN MIGUEL AGUAS 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

LOOMIS, FARGO & CO., a Texas 

corporation; HARRY DENNIS; RICHARD 

HUDSON; and DOES I through XX, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 2:05-CV-00241-GEB-PAN 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

FOR WITNESS DEPOSITIONS 

// 

Case 2:05-cv-00241-GEB-PAN Document 17 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY 

DEADLINE FOR WITNESS DEPOSITIONS - 2 

Law Offices of Johnny L. Griffin III 

1010 F Street, Suite 200 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 444-5557

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Plaintiff Juan Miguel Aguas (“Plaintiff”) is represented by Johnny L. Griffin, III and 

Victoria M. Ciganda of the Law Offices of Johnny L. Griffin, III. Defendants Loomis, Fargo & 

Co., Harry Dennis, and Richard Hudson (“Defendants”) are represented by Richard R. Gray 

and Katy A. Bolls of Littler Mendelson. 

The discovery cut-off date set forth in the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order is 

November 30, 2005. There are approximately ten witness depositions that remain to be 

completed. The parties agree that the discovery cut-off should be extended for the purpose of 

taking the witness depositions and therefore jointly request that the Court enter an Order 

extending the discovery cut-off. 

The parties agree that good cause exists to extend the discovery cut-off for the purpose 

of witness depositions. The parties are engaged in serious settlement negotiations and wish to 

avoid the expense of witness depositions at this time. Moreover, due to scheduling conflicts the 

parties are unable to complete the witness depositions before the discovery cut-off date set by 

the Court. 

The parties further agree that extending the discovery cut-off for the purpose of witness 

depositions will not modify or change any other date set forth in the Status (Pretrial 

Scheduling) Order. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their 

respective attorneys of record that the discovery cut-off set forth in the Status (Pretrial 

Scheduling) Order on November 30, 2005, shall be extended until February 3, 2006, for the 

sole purpose of witness depositions. The parties jointly request that the Court enter an Order 

accordingly. 

Case 2:05-cv-00241-GEB-PAN Document 17 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY 

DEADLINE FOR WITNESS DEPOSITIONS - 3 

Law Offices of Johnny L. Griffin III 

1010 F Street, Suite 200 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 444-5557

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Dated: October 26, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III

 

 

By: /s/ Victoria M. Ciganda 

 VICTORIA M. CIGANDA 

 Attorney for JUAN MIGUEL AGUAS 

Dated: October 26, 2005 LITTLER MENDELSON

 By: /s/ Richard R. Gray 

(as authorized on October 26, 2005) 

RICHARD R. GRAY 

Attorney for LOOMIS, FARGO & CO., 

HARRY DENNIS and RICHARD 

HUDSON 

Since the parties stipulated to the requested continuance, the good cause issue is not 

reached and the request is granted. The discovery completion date is continued to February 3, 

2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 27, 2005 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. 

 United States District Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-00241-GEB-PAN Document 17 Filed 10/27/05 Page 3 of 3