Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00455/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00455-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID WAYNE WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

LURA MERRITT, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:22-cv-00455-JLT-CDB (PC)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION AS MOOT

(Doc. 43)

Plaintiff David Wayne Wilson seeks to hold the defendants liable for civil rights 

violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of this Court’s Order Adopting Findings and 

Recommendations to Dismiss Certain Claims and Defendants Following Screening of Plaintiff’s 

First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 43.) He maintains his objections, mailed on December 10, 2023,

were not considered by the Court. (Id.) 

The Court issued an Amended Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations to 

Dismiss Certain Claims and Defendants Following Screening of Plaintiff’s First Amended 

Complaint on December 19, 2023. (Doc. 39.) In the amended order, the Court “reviewed the 

matter anew, including Plaintiff’s objections” and again concluded the findings were supported 

by the record and proper analysis. (Id. at 2.) Therefore, reconsideration of the earlier order is 

unwarranted because the Court fully considered Plaintiff’s objections. 

Case 1:22-cv-00455-JLT-CDB Document 45 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 43) is DENIED as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2024 

Case 1:22-cv-00455-JLT-CDB Document 45 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 2