Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-02573/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-02573-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND 

MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT P. DAVID, in his official 

capacity as Director of the California 

Office of Statewide Health Planning 

and Development,

Defendant.

No. 2:17-cv-02573-MCE-KJN

ORDER

On November 22, 2019, this Court issued a Supplemental Pretrial Scheduling 

Order, which requires that non-expert discovery be completed within one year of the 

order, and that dispositive motions be filed within 180 days after the close of discovery. 

ECF No. 58. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s subsequent objections and California’s 

response thereto. Those objections are hereby SUSTAINED. Plaintiff shall file its 

motion for summary judgment within 30 days of the order. California shall file its 

response within 45 days after Plaintiff’s motion is filed.1 Plaintiff may file a reply within 

///

 

1

In their Joint Status Report, California requests 45 days to respond to Plaintiff’s motion should

the Court enter Plaintiff’s proposed scheduling order. ECF No. 57, at 16. The Court grants California’s 

request.

Case 2:17-cv-02573-MCE-KJN Document 61 Filed 01/13/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

15 days after California’s response is filed, and California may file a reply within 15 days

of Plaintiff’s reply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2020

Case 2:17-cv-02573-MCE-KJN Document 61 Filed 01/13/20 Page 2 of 2