Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01667/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01667-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 861
Nature of Suit: Social Security - HIA (1395 ff)
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

Stip. for Ext.; 2:24-cv-01667-CSK 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILLIP TALBERT 

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE, WSBA No. 32245

Associate General Counsel

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 

MARY TSAI, CSBN 216963

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

6401 Security Boulevard

Baltimore, MD 21235

Telephone: (510) 970-4864

E-Mail: mary.tsai@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MAJINDER KAUR PAHAL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:24-cv-01667-CSK

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME 

Pending the Court’s approval, the parties hereby stipulate that the time for Defendant to 

respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended thirty (30) days from 

November 4, 2024, up to and including December 4, 2024. 

This is Defendant’s first request for an extension, and it is made with good cause. This 

case was recently reassigned to undersigned counsel for Defendant, along with three other briefs, 

all of which are due by mid-November 2024. In total, counsel now has five briefs due in 

approximately the next three weeks. Undersigned counsel also has preplanned leave in late 

November. Thus, Defendant requires an extension in this case, and may require extensions in 

Case 2:24-cv-01667-CSK Document 18 Filed 10/29/24 Page 1 of 2
Stip. for Ext.; 2:24-cv-01667-CSK 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

other cases, and requests this extension in good faith and with no intent to delay these 

proceedings unnecessarily.

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified 

accordingly. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 24, 2024 /s/ Josephine Mary Gerrard* 

(*as authorized via e-mail on October 24, 2024)

JOSEPHINE MARY GERRARD

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: October 24, 2024 PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE 

Associate General Counsel

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

By: /s/ Mary Tsai

MARY TSAI

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant shall have an 

extension, up to and including December 4, 2024, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment.

DATED: October 29, 2024

HON. CHI SOO KIM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-01667-CSK Document 18 Filed 10/29/24 Page 2 of 2