Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00016/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00016-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Susan M. Snyder, a married woman, as her

sole and separate property, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

HSBC Bank, USA, N.A., a foreign

corporation and Ocwen Loan Servicing,

LLC, a foreign limited liability company,

et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-12-16-PHX-LOA

ORDER

The Court is in receipt of the former Defendant, Les Zieve’s, Declaration seeking a

Request for Reasonable Attorney’s Fees and Cost [sic], doc. 43. The Declaration violates the

District of Arizona’s Local Rules because it was not properly filed in text-searchable format

per Local Rule (“LRCiv”) 7.1(c), 5.5(b) and the definition of “.pdf.” in the District Court’s

ECF Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, at I(A), p. 2. Additionally, the

Declaration violates LRCiv 7.1(a)(1) because there is no email address for the attorney

appearing in the matter. The Court will strike the non-conforming filing without prejudice.

LRCiv 7.1(d)(5). The Court only desires compliance with the Local Rules, not imposing

punitive measures. 

The Ninth Circuit has “explain[ed], yet again, the importance of following a district

court’s local rules. ‘District courts have broad discretion in interpreting and applying their

Case 2:12-cv-00016-LOA Document 45 Filed 07/13/12 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

local rules.’” Simmons v. Navajo County, 609 F.3d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting

Miranda v. South Pac. Transp. Co., 710 F.2d 516, 521 (9th Cir. 1983)). Local rules have

“the force of law.” Hollingsworth v. Perry, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 705, 710 (2010)

(quoting Weil v. Neary, 278 U.S. 160, 169 (1929)). They “are binding upon the parties and

upon the court, and a departure from local rules that affects substantial rights requires

reversal.” Professional Programs Group v. Department of Commerce, 29 F.3d 1349, 1353

(9th Cir. 1994) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

LRCiv 7.1(c) mandates that “[d]ocuments submitted for filing in the ECF System

shall be in a portable document format (.pdf). Documents which exist only in paper format

shall be scanned into .pdf for electronic filing. All other documents shall be converted to

.pdf directly from a word processing program (e.g., Microsoft Word® and Corel

WordPerfect®), rather than created from the scanned image of a paper document.” LRCiv

5.5(a) and (b) authorize the Clerk “to develop, publish and implement an Electronic Case

Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual for the District of Arizona

(Administrative Manual)” and establish the “filing of documents electronically in

compliance with these rules and the Administrative Manual will constitute [proper] filing....”

On the Court’s own motion,

IT IS ORDERED that former Defendant Les Zieve’s Declaration re: Defendant’s

Request for Reasonable Attorney’s Fees and Cost [sic], doc. 43, is STRICKEN without

prejudice. If former Defendant Les Zieve timely and fully complies with this Order, his refiled Declaration re: Defendant’s Request for Reasonable Attorney’s Fees and Cost [sic]

shall relate back to its initial filing date pursuant to Rule 15(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that former Defendant may re-file his Declaration re:

Defendant’s Request for Reasonable Attorney’s Fees and Cost [sic] on or before Monday

July 23, 2012 which, if re-filed, shall be substantively identical to the June 25, 2012 filing,

except he shall comply in all respects with this Order and the Local Rules or the Court may

deny ab initio his request for fees. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, except as set forth herein, all counsels’

Case 2:12-cv-00016-LOA Document 45 Filed 07/13/12 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

pleadings, motions, memoranda, or other filings in this case shall be created via personal

computed with a word processing application, e.g., Microsoft Word® or Corel

WordPerfect®, then converted to portable document format (.pdf). See LRCiv 7.1(c) and

definition of “.pdf,” ECF Manual at 1(A), p. 2. (“[E]lectronic documents must be converted

to .pdf directly from a word processing program (e.g., Microsoft Word® or Corel

WordPerfect® and must be text searchable.”). Such filings shall not be printed to paper then

scanned and saved as portable document format (.pdf). Documents which exist only in paper

form, like exhibits or certain attachments to pleadings may, however, be scanned from a

paper copy and saved in a portable document format (.pdf).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall comply with the District Court’s

civil Local Rules, including LRCiv 7.1(a) (1) which mandates that the email address of the

attorney appearing for the party be included in the upper left hand corner.

Dated this 13th day of July, 2012. 

Case 2:12-cv-00016-LOA Document 45 Filed 07/13/12 Page 3 of 3