Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01268/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01268-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIRAM TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

MONOLITHIC SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY,

INC, et al.,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 04-1268 VRW (MEJ)

ORDER RE TSMC'S

INTERROGATORY NO. 14

The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint discovery dispute letter, dated September 19,

2006. (Doc. #241.) In the letter, TSMC requests an order requiring UniRAM to supplement its

response to TSMC's Interrogatory No. 14 by identifying, for each trade secret, the disclosure in

patents or patent applications where UniRAM included the trade secret, and the circumstances

surrounding any disclosure of confidential patent applications to TSMC. UniRAM's trade secret

disclosure has 208 trade secrets; however, Judge Walker ordered UniRAM to pare down its list of

trade secrets to 12 by October 20, 2006. (Doc. #198.) Accordingly, the Court finds TSMC's request

premature. If a dispute remains after October 20, the parties shall again meet and confer on this

issue and thereafter file a joint letter if unable to resolve their dispute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 259 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 1