Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

 2

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: DAMAGES DISCOVERY SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 02 3378 JSW (JL) 1

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

DANIEL J. FURNISS (State Bar No. 73531), djfurniss@townsend.com 

JOSEPH A. GRECO (State Bar No. 104476), jagreco@townsend.com 

IAN L. SAFFER (pro hac vice), ilsaffer@townsend.com 

LEONARD J. AUGUSTINE, JR. (State Bar No. 198661), ljaugustine@townsend.com

ROBERT D. TADLOCK (State Bar No. 238479), rdtadlock@townsend.com 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400 

Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

FOUNTAINHEAD LAW GROUP 

CHAD R. WALSH (State Bar No. 214290), crwalsh@townsend.com 

900 Lafayette Street, Suite 509 

Santa Clara, California 95050 

Telephone: (408) 244-6319 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA INTEGRATION, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, 

a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, 

 v. 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA 

INTEGRATION, INC., formerly known as 

ACTA TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

a Delaware corporation, 

 Defendant and Counterclaimant. 

 CASE NO. C 02 3378 JSW (JL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE DUE DATE FOR 

REBUTTAL EXPORT REPORT AND 

DAMAGES DISCOVERY CUTOFF 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-JSW Document 339 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 342 Filed 10/11/06 Page 1 of 3
 

 1 

 2

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: DAMAGES DISCOVERY SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 02 3378 JSW (JL) 1

Plaintiff Informatica Corporation ("Informatica") served its opening expert report on damages 

(the "Opening Report") on June 16, 2006, and a supplemental expert report on damages on September 

22, 2006. The rebuttal expert report on damages (the "Rebuttal Report") of Business Objects Data 

Integration, Inc. ("BODI") is scheduled to be due on October 13, 2006. 

In preparation for its Rebuttal Report, BODI desires to take a deposition pursuant to Rule 

30(b)(6) regarding damages issues potentially relevant to its Rebuttal Report. Informatica's witness 

for the deposition is not available until October 24, 2006, and a deposition has been scheduled for that 

date. To allow BODI sufficient time to prepare its Rebuttal Report after the taking of the deposition 

pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6), the parties have agreed to extend the due date for BODI's Rebuttal Report, 

with a corresponding extension for damages discovery cut-off. The parties hereby respectfully request 

the Court adopt the schedule set forth below. 

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), attached hereto is a Declaration of Leonard J. 

Augustine, Jr. setting forth (i) the reasons for the requested enlargement, (ii) a disclosure of all 

previous modifications in the case, and (iii) a description of the effect of the requested time 

modification on the schedule for the case. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-JSW Document 339 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 342 Filed 10/11/06 Page 2 of 3
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

CASE NO. C 02 3378 JSW (JL) 2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel 

that the following discovery dates shall be: 

EVENT DATE 

Parties to comply with Rule 26(a)(2)(B) in rebuttal/opposition with 

respect to damages issues on which the other party bears the burden of 

proof ("Rebuttal Damages Expert Reports") 

November 3, 2006 

Damages Discovery cut-off December 1, 2006 

Dated: October 6, 2006 Respectfully submitted, 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

By: /s/ Leonard J. Augustine, Jr. 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA INTEGRATION, INC. 

Dated: October 6, 2006 Respectfully submitted, 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Carolyn Chang 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.` 

Dated: ______________, 2006 

 

JEFFREY S. WHITE 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-JSW Document 339 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 3 of 3

October 11, 2006

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 342 Filed 10/11/06 Page 3 of 3