Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-02215/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-02215-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James Michael Morgan, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et. al.,

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-10-2215-PHX-ROS

ORDER

On November 28, 2011, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation.

(Doc. 38). Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation. No objections

being made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in full.

A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has

filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district

court’s review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.”) (internal

quotations and citations omitted).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) is ADOPTED.

Case 2:10-cv-02215-ROS Document 40 Filed 12/16/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED the Petitioner for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE as time barred.

IT IS ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal is denied because the denial of the motion is justified by a plain

procedural bar.

DATED this 16th day of December, 2011.

Case 2:10-cv-02215-ROS Document 40 Filed 12/16/11 Page 2 of 2