Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01042/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01042-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:206 Collect Unpaid Wages

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The parties have represented to the Court after having agreed as to the electronically held 

information to be produced by the defendant they have discovered the volume of documents is much 

greater than they previously anticipated. (Doc. 60 at 4) Thus, they jointly request a few extra weeks 

be added to the briefing schedule on the emotion for summary judgment. Id. Thus, the Court 

GRANTS the request to amend the schedule related to the motion for summary judgment as follows:

1. The plaintiffs’ opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion for summary 

judgment SHALL be filed no later than May 22, 2017;

2. Any reply may be filed no later than June 22, 2017;

3. The hearing on the motion for summary judgment is CONTINUED to July 5, 2017 at 

9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5, before Judge Drozd.

///

STEPHEN HALE, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

ENSIGN UNITED STATES DRILLING 

(CALIFORNIA) Inc., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:15-CV-01042 DAD JLT

ORDER GRANTING SECOND AMENDMENT 

TO THE SCHEDULE ON THE MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Doc. 62)

Case 1:15-cv-01042-DAD-JLT Document 63 Filed 01/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Absolutely no further amendments to the briefing schedule will be considered by the Court 

absent a showing of exceptional good cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01042-DAD-JLT Document 63 Filed 01/10/17 Page 2 of 2