Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01283/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01283-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

M cNAM ARA, NE Y, BEATT Y, SLA TTERY, BORG ES & AM BACHER LLP

A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W

1 2 1 1 N E W E L L A V E N U E , W A L N U T C R E E K , C A 9 4 5 9 6

T E L E P H O N E : ( 9 2 5 ) 9 3 9 - 5 3 3 0

123456789

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMSSING 

CLAIMS- 2:06-CV-01283-WBS-CMK

JAMES V. FITZGERALD, III (State Bar No. 55632)

NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167) MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP

1211 Newell Avenue

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Telephone: (925) 939-5330

Facsimile: (925) 939-0203

Attorneys for Defendants

JASON POTTS, JEREMY PATZER and ERIC JENSEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON EUGENE DEOCAMPO; JESUS 

SEBASTIAN GRANT; and JAQUEZS 

TYREE BERRY,,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal 

corporation; ROBERT NICHELINI, in his 

capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY 

OF VALLEJO; JASON POTTS, 

individually, and in his capacity as a 

Vallejo police officer; JEREMY PATZER, 

individually, and in his capacity as a 

Vallejo police officer; ERIC JENSEN, 

individually, and in his capacity as a 

Vallejo police officer; and DOES 1 through 

25, inclusive ,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:06-CV-01283-WBS-CMK

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS

Judge: Hon. William B. Schubb

Trial Date: August 6, 2013

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties to this action, 

through their respective counsel of record, and approved by the Court in the accompanying Order, 

that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the parties agree as follows:

1. Plaintiffs agree to the dismissal, with prejudice, of their due process claims under 

the Fifth Amendment in Plaintiffs’ First Cause of Action in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, filed on April 

7, 2006. 

Case 2:06-cv-01283-WBS-CMK Document 83 Filed 05/09/13 Page 1 of 3
M cNAM ARA, NE Y, BEATT Y, SLA TTERY, BORG ES & AM BACHER LLP

A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W

1 2 1 1 N E W E L L A V E N U E , W A L N U T C R E E K , C A 9 4 5 9 6

T E L E P H O N E : ( 9 2 5 ) 9 3 9 - 5 3 3 0

123456789

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMSSING 

CLAIMS - 2:06-CV-01283-WBS-CMK

2

2. Plaintiffs agree to the dismissal, with prejudice, of their excessive force claims 

under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments in Plaintiffs’ First Cause of Action in Plaintiffs’ 

Complaint, filed on April 7, 2006. 3. Plaintiffs agree to the dismissal, with prejudice, of their alleged claims for 

violation of privacy under the Ninth Amendment in Plaintiffs’ First Cause of Action in Plaintiffs’ 

Complaint, filed on April 7, 2006. 4. Plaintiffs agree to the dismissal, with prejudice, of their Equal Protection claim 

under the Fourteenth Amendment in Plaintiffs’ First Cause of Action in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, 

filed on April 7, 2006. 5. Plaintiffs agree to the dismissal, with prejudice, of their state claim for negligent 

infliction of emotional distress in Plaintiffs’ Sixth Cause of Action in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, filed 

on April 7, 2006. 6. The parties agree that each party to bear their own fees and costs in relation to 

these dismissed claims and parties. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: May 8, 2013LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L.BURRIS 

LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B.LIBET

By: /s/ Gayla B. Libet

John L. Burris, Esq.,DeWitt Lacy, Esq., Gayla B. Libet, 

Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: May 8, 2013MCNAMARA,NEY,BEATTY,SLATTERY,

BORGES &AMBACHER LLP

By: /s/ Noah G. Blechman_

James V. Fitzgerald, III / Noah G. Blechman

Attorneys for Defendants

JASON POTTS, JEREMY PATZER and ERIC 

JENSEN

Case 2:06-cv-01283-WBS-CMK Document 83 Filed 05/09/13 Page 2 of 3
M cNAM ARA, NE Y, BEATT Y, SLA TTERY, BORG ES & AM BACHER LLP

A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W

1 2 1 1 N E W E L L A V E N U E , W A L N U T C R E E K , C A 9 4 5 9 6

T E L E P H O N E : ( 9 2 5 ) 9 3 9 - 5 3 3 0

123456789

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMSSING 

CLAIMS - 2:06-CV-01283-WBS-CMK

3

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, THE COURT ORDERS AS 

FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiffs’ due process claims under the Fifth Amendment in Plaintiffs’ First Cause 

of Action in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, filed on April 7, 2006, are hereby DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. 

2. Plaintiffs’ excessive force claims under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments in 

Plaintiffs’ First Cause of Action in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, filed on April 7, 2006, are hereby 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

3. Plaintiffs’ claims for violation of privacy under the Ninth Amendment in 

Plaintiffs’ First Cause of Action in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, filed on April 7, 2006, are hereby 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

4. Plaintiffs’ claims for violation of Equal Protection under the Fourteenth 

Amendment in Plaintiffs’ First Cause of Action in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, filed on April 7, 2006,

are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

5. Plaintiffs’ claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress in Plaintiffs’ Sixth

Cause of Action in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, filed on April 7, 2006, are hereby DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. 6. Each party bears their own fees and costs in relation to these dismissed claims. 

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: May 9, 2013

Case 2:06-cv-01283-WBS-CMK Document 83 Filed 05/09/13 Page 3 of 3