Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00215/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00215-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 320
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SHELSHEE JONES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:16-cv-0215 TLN GGH PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

By order filed March 14, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight days 

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff of the 

deficiencies in her complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 

filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of her current 

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 

the party is fully effective. 

 Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the reasons given 

in the March 14, 2016 order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed 

with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

Case 2:16-cv-00215-TLN-GGH Document 4 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: April 21, 2016 

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

 

GGH:076/Jones0215.fta 

Case 2:16-cv-00215-TLN-GGH Document 4 Filed 04/21/16 Page 2 of 2