Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01707/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01707-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Gaston’s discovery request erroneously requested the July 30, 2000 enemy chrono. No

such document exists. Defendants’ counsel believes Gaston intended to request the CDC 128B

dated July 31, 2000 which records his confidential report of his enemy concern.

Stipulation for Protective Order 

1

EDMUND G. BROWN JR.

Attorney General of the State of California

DAVID S. CHANEY

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

DAVID A. CARRASCO

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

JAIME M. GANSON, State Bar No. 230206

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 324-6421

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Email: Jaime.Ganson@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendants Caden, Aguirre, Prebula,

Haley and Manuel

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

ANTHONY GASTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

EDWARD CADEN et al.,

Defendants.

2:03-cv-1707 LKK CMK P

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE

ORDER

IT IS STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES AND ORDERED BY THE COURT AS

FOLLOWS: 

During the course of discovery, Gaston requested production of a CDC 128B

enemy chrono from the confidential portion of his Central File. This document contains 1/

sensitive information that could endanger institutional security and the safety of people if

disclosed. In addition, its disclosure without a protective order will undermine the CDCR’s

Case 2:03-cv-01707-LKK -CMK Document 95 Filed 07/27/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation for Protective Order 

2

ability to assure its employees and inmates that their confidential enemy concerns will be

maintained in confidence. Accordingly, a protective order is warranted for the disclosure of this

report, and the parties stipulate to the conditions set forth in the order that follows.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 29, 2007 ___/s/ Jaime M. Ganson ___

JAIME M. GANSON

Attorney for Defendants

Dated: July 3, 2007 _/s/ Anthony Gaston _____

ANTHONY GASTON

Plaintiff, in pro per

Case 2:03-cv-01707-LKK -CMK Document 95 Filed 07/27/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation for Protective Order 

3

ORDER

The Court, having considered the parties’ stipulation for protective order, and good

cause showing therefore, orders as follows: 

1. Within 30 days of the court’s approval of this protective order, the CDCR will

release the CDC 128B dated July 31, 2000 for inspection only.

2. Gaston may take notes during the inspection, but may not obtain a copy of the

document.

3. Nothing in this protective order is intended to prevent officials or employees of

the State of California, or other authorized government officials, from having access to

confidential material to which they would have access in the normal course of their official

duties.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

July 26, 2007

/s/ CRAIG M. KELLISON 

Craig M. Kellison

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:03-cv-01707-LKK -CMK Document 95 Filed 07/27/07 Page 3 of 3