Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01526/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01526-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 441
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Voting
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

[Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT CASE NO. 06-CV-01526-OWW-DLB 

COUNTY OF MERCED’S TIME TO ANSWER 

THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FELIX M. LOPEZ, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

MERCED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 06-CV-01526-OWW-DLB 

ORDER EXTENDING 

DEFENDANT COUNTY OF 

MERCED’S TIME TO ANSWER 

THE SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 6(b) & L.R. 6-144 

JUDGES: Hon. Jay S. Bybee 

 Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 

 Hon. Anthony W. Ishii 

COUNTY OF MERCED COUNTY COUNSEL

JAMES N. FINCHER, SBN 196837 

COUNTY COUNSEL 

COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 

2222 M STREET, ROOM 309 

MERCED, CA 95340 

TELEPHONE (209) 385-7564 

NIELSEN, MERKSAMER, PARRINELLO, 

 MUELLER & NAYLOR, LLP 

MARGUERITE MARY LEONI, SBN 101696 

CHRISTOPHER E. SKINNELL, SBN 227093 

591 REDWOOD HIGHWAY, #4000 

MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 

TELEPHONE (415) 389-6800 

FAX (415) 388-6874 

Attorneys for Defendant

COUNTY OF MERCED, CALIFORNIA

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-01526-OWW -DLB Document 176 Filed 07/30/07 Page 1 of 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 

[Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT CASE NO. 06-CV-01526-OWW-DLB 

COUNTY OF MERCED’S TIME TO ANSWER 

THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This matter is before the Court on the STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES EXTENDING 

DEFENDANT COUNTY OF MERCED’S TIME TO ANSWER THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rule 6-144 (Dkt. #174). Upon 

consideration of the Stipulation, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation be ENTERED, and that Defendant County 

of Merced shall have until and through September 21, 2007, to respond to Plaintiffs’ Second 

Amended Complaint (Dkt. #172).1 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline to file dispositive motions in this case, 

currently set for August 30, 2007 (Dkt. #143), is extended to October 1, 2007, with any such 

motions to be heard on _November 15, 2007, at 12:00 PM. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pre-trial conference, currently set for October 29, 

2007, is rescheduled for January 7, 2008, at 11:00 AM_______________________. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the trial date, currently set for November 14, 2007, is 

rescheduled for February 12, 2008, at 9:00 AM_______________________. 

Entered this 25th day of July, 2007 

___/s/ Oliver W. Wanger____ 

Honorable Oliver W. Wanger 

United States District Judge 

 

1 Defendant CITY OF LOS BANOS has already responded to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint by an 

answer filed July 17, 2007 (Dkt. #173). 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-01526-OWW -DLB Document 176 Filed 07/30/07 Page 2 of 2