Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04991/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04991-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

TECHKNOWLEDGE 

LAW GROUP LLP MDL No. 3:10-md-02143-RS

INDIVIDUAL CASE NO. 3:13-cv-04991-RS [PROPOSED]STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KAIWEN TSENG (SBN 193756)

ktseng@tklg-llp.com

HSIANG “JAMES” H. LIN (SBN 241472)

jlin@tklg-llp.com

ERIC SOFGE (SBN 291453)

esofge@tklg-llp.com

TECHKNOWLEDGE LAW GROUP LLP

100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200

Redwood Shores, CA 94065

Telephone: (650) 517-5200

JAMES B. BALDINGER (pro hac vice)

jbaldinger@cfjblaw.com

DAVID B. ESAU (pro hac vice)

desau@cfjblaw.com

CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A.

CityPlace Tower

525 Okeechobee Boulevard, Suite 1200

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Telephone: (561) 659-7070

Facsimile: (561) 659-7368

Attorneys for Plaintiffs ACER AMERICA 

CORPORATION, GATEWAY, INC., and 

GATEWAY U.S. RETAIL, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL No. 3:10-md-02143-RS

MDL No. M 10-2143

Individual Case No. 3:13-cv-04991-RS

This Document Relates to 

Individual Case No. 3:13-cv-04991-RS

ACER INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

LITE-ON IT CORPORATION, et al.

Defendants.

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Case 3:13-cv-04991-RS Document 74 Filed 08/29/16 Page 1 of 2
TECHKNOWLEDGE 

LAW GROUP LLP MDL No. 3:10-md-02143-RS

INDIVIDUAL CASE NO. 3:13-cv-04991-RS -2- [PROPOSED]STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, 

orders as follows:

1. All claims filed by Plaintiffs Acer America Corporation, Gateway, Inc., and 

Gateway U.S. Retail, Inc., formerly known as eMachines, Inc., against Defendants Sony 

Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony NEC Optiarc Inc., Sony Optiarc America Inc., and 

Sony Optiarc Inc. in the above-captioned action are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).

2. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________________, 2016

Honorable Richard Seeborg

United States District Judge

 8/29

Case 3:13-cv-04991-RS Document 74 Filed 08/29/16 Page 2 of 2