Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00945/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00945-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

JERRY L. WILLIAMS, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

) CIV 06-00945 PHX PGR MEA

vs. ) 

) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOSEPH ARPAIO, ) FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

) 

 Defendant. ) 

__________________________)

TO THE HONORABLE PAUL G. ROSENBLATT:

Plaintiff filed his complaint on April 3, 2006. On

May 15, 2006, the Court ordered Plaintiff to complete and return

a service packet for Defendant to the Court by June 4, 2006.

That order warned Plaintiff that his failure to timely comply

with the provisions of the order would result in the dismissal

of the complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. 

Plaintiff was warned that his failure to acquire a

waiver of service from Defendant or to complete service of

process on Defendant within 120 days of the date he filed his

complaint, by July 31, 2006, would result in the dismissal of

the complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m), Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, and Rule 16.2(b)(2)(B), of the United States District

Court for the District of Arizona Local Rules of Civil

Case 2:06-cv-00945-PGR Document 8 Filed 10/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

Procedure. 

On August 2, 2007, the Court allowed Plaintiff until

August 31, 2007, to show cause why this case should not be

dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s

order of May 15, 2006, and Plaintiff’s failure to effect service

of process on Defendant as required by the Court’s order of May

15, 2006, and Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff has failed to show cause for his failure to abide by

the Court’s orders and to effect service of process on

Defendant. There is no indication in the civil docket in this

matter that Plaintiff did not receive the Order to Show Cause.

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this case be

dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to serve the

Defendant in this matter and for Plaintiff’s failure to comply

with the Court’s order of May 15, 2006.

DATED this 15th day of October, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00945-PGR Document 8 Filed 10/16/07 Page 2 of 2