Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-3_19-cv-00362/USCOURTS-ared-3_19-cv-00362-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

NORTHERN DIVISION

CHADDRICK CLARK PLAINTIFF 

V. CASE NO. 3:19-CV-362-LPR-BD

STEVE ROREX, et al.

1 DEFENDANTS

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

I. Procedures for Filing Objections

This Recommendation has been sent to Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Any party to this 

suit may file written objections with the Clerk of Court. To be considered, objections 

must be filed within 14 days. Objections should be specific and should include the factual 

or legal basis for the objection. 

If parties do not file objections, they risk waiving the right to appeal questions of 

fact. And, if no objections are filed, Judge Rudofsky can adopt this Recommendation 

without independently reviewing the record. 

II. Discussion

Plaintiff Chaddrick Clark filed this lawsuit without the help of a lawyer and is 

proceeding in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 1, 3) Plaintiffs such as Mr. Clark, who are not 

represented by counsel, are required to keep the Court informed as to their current 

addresses so that the Court and other parties are able to communicate with them. Local 

Rule 5.5. 

 1 The Clerk of Court is directed to correct the spelling of two Defendants’ names: Steve 

Roax should be Steve Rorex; and Ptrisha Marshall should be Trisha Marshall.

Case 3:19-cv-00362-LPR Document 18 Filed 03/17/20 Page 1 of 2
2

On February 11, 2020, Defendants moved to dismiss this case because mail they 

sent to Mr. Clark was returned to Defendants’ counsel with a notation that Mr. Clark was 

“not at this address.” (Doc. No. 12, Doc. No. 14-1) On February 12, 2020, the Court 

ordered Mr. Clark to notify the Court of his current address within 30 days or risk having 

his claims dismissed. (Doc. No. 16) To date, Mr. Clark has failed to comply with the 

Court’s Order; and the time for complying has passed. 

III. Conclusion

The Court recommends that Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 12) be 

GRANTED and that this case be DISMISSED, without prejudice. 

DATED this 17th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:19-cv-00362-LPR Document 18 Filed 03/17/20 Page 2 of 2