Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00090/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00090-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

McINTOSH LABORATORY, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

UNCLE’S STEREO INC., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-05-0090 MMC

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON

MOTION TO DISMISS

(Docket No. 20)

Before the Court is defendant Vivek Prabhakar’s (“Prabhakar”) motion, filed

March 14, 2005, to dismiss the claims asserted against him, for lack of personal jurisdiction

and failure to state a claim, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure. 

The May 6, 2005 hearing on the motion is hereby CONTINUED to June 24, 2005 at

9:00 a.m., to afford plaintiffs the opportunity to take discovery relevant to the issue of

personal jurisdiction. See Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc., 557

F.2d 1280, 1285 n.1 (9th Cir. 1977) (noting such discovery “may appropriately be granted

where pertinent facts bearing on the question of jurisdiction are controverted or where a

more satisfactory showing of the facts is necessary.”) Plaintiff may file a supplemental

Case 3:05-cv-00090-MMC Document 40 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

opposition no later than June 3, 2005. Prabhakar may file a supplemental reply no later

than June 10, 2005. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2005 

/s/ Maxine M. Chesney 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00090-MMC Document 40 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 2