Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01679/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01679-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISAAC KELLEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1679 DAD P

vs.

GRASS VALLEY POLICE

DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed September 4, 2009, plaintiff was ordered to file a properly

completed in forma pauperis affidavit within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Subsequently, plaintiff filed a

notice of change of address in this case. Accordingly, the court re-served plaintiff with its order. 

The thirty day period since re-service of the court’s order has now expired, and plaintiff has not

filed a properly completed in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to

randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice.

/////

Case 2:09-cv-01679-LKK -DAD Document 14 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 15, 2010.

DAD:9

kell1679.fifp

Case 2:09-cv-01679-LKK -DAD Document 14 Filed 03/16/10 Page 2 of 2