Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01004/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01004-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASHMERE CAZEAU,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CHAVEZ, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-01004-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 10)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Cashmere Cazeau (“plaintiff”), is a federal

prisoner in custody at the United States Penitentiary at Atwater,

and is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 20, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. To

date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:05-cv-01004-AWI-DLB Document 11 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 20, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for

plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s order of May 3, 2006, and

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 23, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01004-AWI-DLB Document 11 Filed 09/26/06 Page 2 of 2