Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00809/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00809-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

20224786v1 1 Case No. C15-00809 MEJ

REQUEST TO CONTINUE MAY 28, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; 

DELIA A. ISVORANU (Bar No. 226750)

delia.isvoranu@sedgwicklaw.com

SEDGWICK LLP

333 Bush Street, 30th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104-2834 

Telephone: 415.781.7900 

Facsimile: 415.781.2635 

Attorneys for Defendants 

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TERRY RAWLINS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF 

CALIFORNIA, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C15-00809 MEJ 

REQUEST TO CONTINUE MAY 28, 2015 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Defendant Regents of the University of California (“Defendant”) respectfully requests 

that the Court briefly continue the May 28, 2015 Case Management Conference (“CMC”) by 

approximately one month. 

Although the Complaint was filed on February 23, 2015, Plaintiff did not serve the 

Complaint until May 1, 2015. Defendant has not appeared in the action and will be filing an 

Answer today, May 22, 2015. 

Because Defendant was not served until May 1, 2015 and has not appeared until today, 

the parties have not yet had an opportunity to meet and confer, prepare a Joint CMC Statement 

and Case Plan, or to gather documents and information for purposes of making Initial 

Disclosures. 

/// 

Case 3:15-cv-00809-MEJ Document 10 Filed 05/26/15 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

20224786v1 2 Case No. C15-00809 MEJ

REQUEST TO CONTINUE MAY 28, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; 

It is therefore respectfully requested that the May 28, 2015 be briefly continued by 

three to four weeks so the parties may meet and confer, prepare a Joint CMC Statement, and 

simultaneously exchange Initial Disclosures. 

DATED: May 22, 2015 SEDGWICK LLP 

 

By: /S/ 

DELIA A. ISVORANU 

Attorneys for Defendant 

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 

CALIFORNIA (erroneously sued as “REGENTS 

OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA”) 

ORDER

 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the May 28, 2015 Case 

Management Conference be continued to ____________________, at ________________. 

SO ORDERED.

 Dated:_________________________ 

 

 HON. MARIA-ELENA JAMES 

The Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. June 25, 2015 10:00 a.m. May 26, 2015

Case 3:15-cv-00809-MEJ Document 10 Filed 05/26/15 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

20224786v1 1 Case No. C15-CV-00809 MEJ

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Terry Rawlins v. Regents of University of California 

United States District Court, Northern District of California 

Case No. C15-00809 MEJ

I, the undersigned, declare: 

I am a citizen of the United States and employed in the County of San Francisco, 

California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My 

business address is 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor, San Francisco, California 94104. 

 On the date noted below, I served a copy of the within document(s): 

 DEFENDANT REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA’S 

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES 

by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set 

forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. 

X by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon 

fully prepaid, the United States mail at San Francisco, California addressed as set 

forth below. 

by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope and affixing a prepaid air bill, and causing the envelope to be delivered to Federal Express for 

delivery. 

by causing said document(s) listed above to be personally delivered to the 

person(s) set forth below. 

by transmitting via e-mail or electronic transmission the document(s) listed above 

to the person(s) at the e-mail address(es) set forth below in the regular course of 

business. The documents were served electronically and the transmission was 

reported as complete and without error. 

Terry Rawlins 

One Wood Street, Apt. 5 

San Francisco, CA 94118 

Plaintiff in Propria Persona 

I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence 

for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same 

day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on 

motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage 

Case 3:15-cv-00809-MEJ Document 10 Filed 05/26/15 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

20224786v1 2 Case No. C15-CV-00809 MEJ

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above 

is true and correct. 

Executed on May 22, 2015, at San Francisco, California. 

 /S/ 

 DELIA A. ISVORANU 

Case 3:15-cv-00809-MEJ Document 10 Filed 05/26/15 Page 4 of 4