Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_08-cv-03979/USCOURTS-ared-4_08-cv-03979-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

KENNITH McDOWELL, ROBERT *

MAULDING, GREGORY J. STICKNEY, *

LUTHER STRIPLING, RUDY KYLE, *

FRED DOLLAR, JAMES JOSLIN, and *

JAMES MILNER, *

*

 Plaintiffs, *

*

*

vs. * No. 4:08cv003979 SWW 

*

*

*

*

ELBERT PRICE, individually and as Trustee *

for Bud Price’s Excavating Service, Inc. *

Profit-Sharing Plan and for Price’s Utility *

Contractors, Inc. Retirement Plan; MARY *

RUTH PRICE, individually and as Trustee *

for Bud Price’s Excavating Service, Inc. *

Profit-Sharing Plan and for Price’s Utility *

Contractors, Inc. Retirement Plan; Bud Price’s *

Excavating Service, Inc. Profit-Sharing Plan; *

and Price’s Utility Contractors, Inc. *

Retirement Plan; Price’s Utility Contractors, *

Inc. as plan administrator for Price’s Utility *

Contractors, Inc. Retirement Plan and *

Bud Price’s Excavating Service, Inc. as plan *

Administrator of Bud Price’s Excavating *

Service, Inc. Profit-Sharing Plan, *

*

 Defendants. *

ORDER

Plaintiffs’ appeal [doc.#293] of the Magistrate Judge’s April 16, 2010 Order [doc.#287],

which ruled on a number of pending motions [doc.#’s 99, 126, 128, 133, 161, 201, 220, and

248], is denied. Plaintiffs are not precluded, however, from asserting their arguments in any

dispositive motion or response thereto, or in an objection to any recommended disposition from

Case 4:08-cv-03979-SWW Document 296 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 2
2

the Magistrate Judge (should that recommended disposition be adverse to plaintiffs either in

whole or in part).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of April 2010.

/s/Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:08-cv-03979-SWW Document 296 Filed 04/29/10 Page 2 of 2