Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03076/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03076-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY DUNSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CORDIS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-03076-SI 

ORDER ON AMENDED MOTION TO 

DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 7

Defendant Cordis Corporation (“Cordis”) recently filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ 

complaint. Dkt. No. 7. Plaintiffs respond that this motion fails to address plaintiffs’ first amended 

complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. No. 15 at 8.1 There appears to be a dispute over whether defendant was 

properly served with the FAC. Dkt. No. 16 at 7, Reply Br. Cordis contends that plaintiffs’

complaint and FAC “are identical in substance,” but that, “[s]hould it aid the Court, Cordis can 

promptly refile its motion to dismiss with citations to the FAC.” Id. at 8. 

Given the length of the two complaints, the addition of defendants to the FAC (and any 

choice of law issues that may be implicated), and the citation discrepancies that exist among the 

parties’ submissions, the Court ORDERS Cordis to promptly refile its motion to dismiss with 

citations to the FAC, by July 12, 2016 at 12:00pm. The matter remains on the Court’s July 22, 

2016 calendar.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 8, 2016

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

 

1

The page numbers cited refer to the page numbers generated by ECF.

Case 3:16-cv-03076-EMC Document 18 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 1