Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-05193/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-05193-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

AMENDED ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT 10-CV-05193-VKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HAYLEY HICKCOX-HUFFMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

US AIRWAYS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 10-cv-05193-VKD 

AMENDED ORDER RE 

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 92

On November 16, 2010, Plaintiff Hayley Hickcox-Huffman (“Plaintiff”) filed a proposed 

nationwide class action lawsuit against Defendants US Airways, Inc. and US Airways Group, Inc. 

(collectively, “US Airways”) (together, Plaintiff and US Airways shall be referred to as the 

“Parties”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 

CV10-05193 HRL1, which asserted claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, breach of 

the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, negligent misrepresentation, and interference with use 

of property/bailment.

On January 31, 2011, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint, which asserted claims 

for breach of self-imposed undertaking, breach of contract (express), breach of contract (implied), 

breach of contract (federal law), breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, 

unjust enrichment, intentional misrepresentation, and negligent misrepresentation, that related to 

or arose from US Airways’ transporting baggage for passengers on its airline (“the Action”).

 

1 By Order of the Court dated June 4, 2018 (Dkt. No. 85), this matter was reassigned to the 

Honorable Virginia K. DeMarchi, when the case number changed from 10CV-05193 HRL to 10-

cv-05193 VKD.

Case 5:10-cv-05193-VKD Document 107 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 11
- 2 -

AMENDED ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT 10-CV-05193-VKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Parties briefed a number of motions directed to the pleadings as well as an appeal to 

the Ninth Circuit of this Court’s ruling on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the First Amended 

Complaint. The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded the matter to this Court in May 2017. On 

remand, the Parties stipulated to dismiss certain causes of action and this Court dismissed a 

number of others, leaving only Plaintiff’s claim for breach of contract (express).

The Parties have entered into a Stipulation of Class Action Settlement (“Agreement”), the 

fairness, reasonableness, and adequateness of which is the subject of this Order, in which the 

Parties have agreed to settle the Action pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement, 

and which will result in dismissal of the Action with prejudice.

The Court finds that Class Counsel have conducted an extensive investigation into the 

facts and law relating to the matters alleged in the Action, including by (i) considering the merit 

of the remaining claim of breach of express contract; and (ii) engaging in extensive discovery, 

including a review of relevant documents, such as the US Airways Terms of Transportation, 

website postings, customer service plans, and an extensive review of data relating to pricing, 

revenue, and volume of checked baggage during the relevant time period. Plaintiff also represents 

that she engaged expert witnesses to assist in her review and evaluation of data related to lost and 

delayed checked baggage.

The Parties reached a settlement following extensive arms’-length negotiations that 

occurred over the course of two full-day, in-person mediation sessions with Jill Sperber, Esq., of 

Judicate West.

Counsel for the Parties are highly experienced in this type of litigation, with full 

knowledge of the risks inherent in the Action.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Agreement, including the exhibits attached thereto 

and all file, records and prior proceedings to date in this matter, and good cause appearing based 

on the record,

IT IS hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:

1. Defined Terms. For purposes of this Order, except as otherwise indicated herein, 

Case 5:10-cv-05193-VKD Document 107 Filed 10/26/18 Page 2 of 11
- 3 -

AMENDED ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT 10-CV-05193-VKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the Court adopts and incorporates the definitions contained in the Agreement.

2. Stay of the Action. All proceedings in the Action, other than proceedings 

necessary to carry out or enforce the terms and conditions of the Agreement and this Order, are 

hereby stayed.

3. Preliminary Class Certification for Settlement Purposes Only. The Action is 

preliminarily certified as a class action, for settlement purposes only, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

23(a) and (b)(3). The Court preliminarily finds for settlement purposes that: (a) the Class certified 

herein numbers at least in the tens of thousands of persons, and joinder of all such persons would 

be impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact that are common to the Class, and those 

questions of law and fact common to the Class predominate over any questions affecting any 

individual Class Member; (c) the claims of the Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the Class she 

seeks to represent for purposes of settlement; (d) a class action on behalf of the Class is superior 

to other available means of adjudicating this dispute; and (e) as set forth below, Plaintiff and 

Class Counsel are adequate representatives of the Class. US Airways retains all rights to assert 

that the Action may not be certified as a class action, other than for settlement purposes. The 

Court also concludes that, because the Action is being settled rather than litigated, the Court need 

not consider manageability issues that might be presented by the trial of a nationwide class action 

involving the issues in this case. See Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591, 620 (1997).

4. Class Definition. The Class shall consist of all passengers of US Airways who 

traveled on a domestic flight between November 16, 2005 and April 29, 2010, checked baggage 

that was lost or delayed, reported to US Airways during the Class Period that their checked 

baggage was lost or delayed, and whose checked baggage fee was not previously refunded. 

Specifically excluded from the Class are: (a) US Airways, its employees, principals, officers, 

directors, agents, affiliated entities legal representatives, successors and assigns; (b) the judges to 

whom the Action has been or is assigned and any members of their immediate families; and (c) 

all persons who have filed a timely Request for Exclusion from the Class. The “Subject Service”

is US Airways’ commitment to transport a passenger’s checked baggage to a passenger’s 

Case 5:10-cv-05193-VKD Document 107 Filed 10/26/18 Page 3 of 11
- 4 -

AMENDED ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT 10-CV-05193-VKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

destination on domestic flights at any time between November 16, 2005 and April 29, 2010, 

inclusive.

5. Class Representative and Class Counsel. Plaintiff is designated as representative of 

the conditionally certified Class. The Court preliminarily finds that she is similarly situated to 

absent Class Members and therefore typical of the Class, and that she will be an adequate class 

representative. Karczag and Associates PC, Foley Bezek Behle & Curtis LLP, and the Law Office 

of William M. Aron, whom the Court finds are experienced and adequate counsel for purposes of 

these settlement approval proceedings, are hereby designated as Class Counsel.

6. Preliminary Settlement Approval. Upon preliminary review, the Court finds that 

the Agreement and the terms it incorporates, appears fair, reasonable and adequate. See generally

Fed. R. Civ. P. 23; Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth, § 21.632 (2004). Accordingly, the 

Agreement is preliminarily approved and is sufficient to warrant sending notice to the Class.

7. Jurisdiction. The Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the Action pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1367, and personal jurisdiction over the Parties before it. Additionally, 

venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391.

8. Fairness Hearing. A Fairness Hearing shall be held before this Court on April 1, 

2019, 10:00 a.m. at the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 280 

South 1st Street, 5th Floor, Courtroom 2, San Jose, CA 95113, to determine, among other things 

(a) whether the Action should be finally certified as a class action for settlement purposes 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a), and (b)(3); (b) whether the settlement of the Action pursuant to 

the terms and conditions of the Agreement should be approved as fair, reasonable and adequate, 

and finally approved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e); (c) whether the Action should be 

dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the Agreement; (d) whether Class Members 

who do not timely request exclusion should be bound by the Release set forth in the Agreement; 

(e) whether Class Members and related persons should be subject to a permanent injunction; and 

(f) whether to grant Class Counsel’s application for an award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses 

and an Incentive Award for Plaintiff (the “Fee Application”). Papers in support of final approval 

Case 5:10-cv-05193-VKD Document 107 Filed 10/26/18 Page 4 of 11
- 5 -

AMENDED ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT 10-CV-05193-VKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

of the Agreement and the Fee Application shall be filed with the Court according to the schedule 

set forth in Paragraph 14 below. Objections to the Agreement or the Fee Application shall be filed 

with the Court on or before the Objection Deadline set forth in Paragraph 14 below, and papers in 

response to such objections must be filed on or before March 25, 2019. The Fairness Hearing may 

be postponed, adjourned, or continued by order of the Court without further notice to the Class. 

After the Fairness Hearing, the Court may enter a Final Order and Final Judgment in accordance 

with the Agreement that will fully and finally adjudicate the rights of the Class Members with 

respect to the proposed Released Claims.

9. Administration. In consultation with and with the approval of US Airways, Class 

Counsel is hereby authorized to establish the means necessary to administer the proposed 

Settlement and implement the claim process, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.

10. Class Notice. The form and content of the proposed Long Form Notice and 

Summary Notice, attached as Exhibits E and F, respectively, to the Agreement, and the notice 

methodology described in the Agreement, are hereby approved. Pursuant to the Agreement, the 

Court appoints KCC, LLC as the Settlement Administrator to help implement the terms of the 

Agreement.

(a) Notice Date. No later than November 23, 2018, the Settlement Administrator shall 

provide notice to the Class pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and the deadlines set forth in 

Paragraph 14 below, in accordance with the notice program set forth in the Agreement. The 

Parties shall coordinate with the Settlement Administrator to provide notice to the Class pursuant 

to terms therein.

(b) Findings Concerning Notice. The Court finds that the Settlement is fair and 

reasonable such that the Long Form Notice and Summary Notice should be provided pursuant to 

the Agreement and this Order.

(c) The Court finds that the form, content and method of disseminating notice to the 

Class as described in Paragraphs 10 and 14 of this Order: (i) complies with Rule 23(c)(2) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as it is the best practicable notice under the circumstances, and 

Case 5:10-cv-05193-VKD Document 107 Filed 10/26/18 Page 5 of 11
- 6 -

AMENDED ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT 10-CV-05193-VKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

is reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise the members of the Class of the 

pendency of the Action, the terms of the Settlement, and their right to object to the Settlement or 

exclude themselves from the Settlement Class; (ii) complies with Rule 23(e) as it is reasonably 

calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise the Class Members of the pendency of the Action, 

the terms of the proposed Settlement, and their rights under the proposed settlement, including, 

but not limited to, their right to object to or exclude themselves from the proposed Settlement and 

other rights under the terms of the Settlement Agreement; (iii) constitute due, adequate, and 

sufficient notice to all Class Members and other persons entitled to receive notice; and (iv) meets 

all applicable requirements of law, including, but not limited to, 28 U.S.C. § 1715, Fed. R. Civ. P. 

23(c) and (e), and the Due Process Clause(s) of the United States Constitution. The Court further 

finds that all of the notices are written in simple terminology, are readily understandable by Class 

Members, and comply with the Federal Judicial Center’s illustrative class action notices.

11. Exclusion from Class. Any Class Member who wishes to be excluded from the 

Class must send to the Settlement Administrator by U.S. Mail a personally signed letter including 

(a) his or her full name; (b) his or her current address; (c) a clear statement communicating that he 

or she elects to be excluded from the Class, does not wish to be a Class Member, and elects to be 

excluded from any judgment entered pursuant to the Agreement; (d) his or her signature; and (e) 

the case name and case number of the Action. A Class Member can exclude only himself or 

herself from the Class, and shall not be allowed to request that another individual or a group be 

excluded. “Mass” or “class” opt-outs are not permitted. Any such Request for Exclusion must be 

postmarked and sent or electronically submitted via the Settlement website to the Settlement 

Administrator no later than February 21, 2019 (the “Opt-Out Date”). The Settlement 

Administrator shall forward copies of any written or electronic requests for exclusion to Class 

Counsel and Defense Counsel. The Settlement Administrator shall file a list reflecting all timely 

requests for exclusion with the Court no later than seven (7) days before the Fairness Hearing.

If the proposed Settlement is finally approved, any potential Class Member for whom the 

Settlement Administrator is not able to determine an accurate address and who, in accordance 

Case 5:10-cv-05193-VKD Document 107 Filed 10/26/18 Page 6 of 11
- 7 -

AMENDED ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT 10-CV-05193-VKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

with the terms and conditions of the Agreement, has neither submitted a timely written Request 

for Exclusion on or before the Opt Out Date nor submitted a valid and timely Claim Form shall 

be bound by all terms of the Agreement and the Final Order and Final Judgment, regardless of 

whether they objected to the Settlement, even if the potential Class Member previously initiated 

or subsequently initiates any litigation against any or all of the Released Parties relating to 

Released Claims. All persons or entities who properly exclude themselves from the Class shall 

not be Class Members and shall relinquish their rights or benefits under the Agreement, should it 

be approved, and may not file an objection to the Settlement or be entitled to any settlement 

benefits.

12. Objections and Appearances. Any Class Member who intends to object to the 

fairness, reasonableness, and/or adequacy of the Settlement must file a written objection with the 

Court through the Court’s CM/ECF system (or any other method in which the Court will accept 

filings, if any) no later than the Objection Deadline. Class Members who object must set forth: (a) 

their full name; (b) their current address; (c) a written statement of their objection(s) and the 

reasons for each objection; (d) a statement of whether they intend to appear at the Fairness 

Hearing (with or without counsel); (e) their signature; (f) a statement, sworn to under penalty of 

perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, attesting to the fact that he or she checked a bag on a 

domestic flight with US Airways between November 16, 2005 and April 29, 2010 that was lost or 

delayed, reported to US Airways during the Class Period that his or her checked baggage was lost 

or delayed, and did not receive a refund of the checked baggage fee for the lost or delayed bag; 

(g) details of his or her checked baggage on a domestic flight with US Airways, including the 

date and location of the airport at which he or she checked the baggage and the location of the 

destination airport at which the Class Member reported the bag lost or delayed; and (h) the case 

name and case number of the Action.

Class Members or their attorneys who intend to make an appearance at the Fairness 

Hearing must deliver a notice of intention to appear to Class Counsel identified and to Defense 

Counsel, and file said notice with the Court, no later the date scheduled in Paragraph 14 below, or 

Case 5:10-cv-05193-VKD Document 107 Filed 10/26/18 Page 7 of 11
- 8 -

AMENDED ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT 10-CV-05193-VKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

as the Court may otherwise direct. Objections that are served on the Parties but not filed or mailed 

to the Court (and not filed pursuant to the Court’s CM/ECF system, or any other method in which 

the Court will accept filings, if any), shall not be received or considered by the Court at the 

Fairness Hearing. Any Class Member who fails to comply with the provisions in this Paragraph 

shall waive and forfeit any and all rights he or she may have to appear separately and/or to object, 

and shall be bound by all the terms of the Agreement, this Order, and by all proceedings, orders, 

and judgments, including, but not limited to, the release in the Agreement. The Settlement 

Administrator, Defense Counsel, and Class Counsel shall promptly furnish each other copies of 

any and all objections that might come into their possession.

13. Preliminary Injunction. All Class Members and/or their representatives, who do 

not timely and properly exclude themselves from the Class are barred and enjoined from directly, 

indirectly, derivatively, in a representative capacity, or in any other capacity, filing, commencing, 

prosecuting, maintaining, intervening in, participating in, conducting, or continuing any action in 

any forum (state or federal) as individual actions, class members, putative class members, or 

otherwise against the Released Parties (as that term is defined in the Agreement) in any court or 

tribunal asserting any of the Released Claims (as that term is defined in the Agreement), and/or 

from receiving any benefits from any lawsuit, administrative or regulatory proceeding, or order in 

any jurisdiction, based on or relating to the Released Claims. In addition, all such persons are 

hereby barred and enjoined from filing, commencing, or prosecuting a lawsuit against US 

Airways (or against any of its related parties, parents, subsidiaries, or affiliates) as a class action, 

a separate class, or group for purposes of pursuing a putative class action (including by seeking to 

amend a pending complaint to include class allegations or by seeking class certification in a 

pending action in any jurisdiction) on behalf of Class Members who do not timely exclude 

themselves from the Class, arising out of, based on or relating to the Released Claims. Pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. §§ 1651(a) and 2283, the Court finds that issuance of this preliminary injunction is 

necessary and appropriate in aid of the Court’s continuing jurisdiction and authority over the 

Action.

Case 5:10-cv-05193-VKD Document 107 Filed 10/26/18 Page 8 of 11
- 9 -

AMENDED ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT 10-CV-05193-VKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

14. Summary of Deadlines. In summary, the deadlines set by this Order are as follows. 

If any deadline set forth in this Order falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday, then such 

deadline shall extend to the next Court day. These deadlines may be extended by order of the 

Court, for good cause shown, without further notice to the Class. Class Members must check the 

Settlement Website regularly for updates and further details regarding this Settlement:

(a) The Long Form Notice shall be published on the Settlement Website no later than 

November 23, 2018 (the “Notice Date”);

(b) The Summary Notice shall be published as soon as possible after the Notice Date;

(c) The Settlement Website and Toll-Free Telephone Number shall be established and 

become operational no later than November 23, 2018.

(d) Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees shall be filed no later than February 7, 2019.

(e) All completed Claim Forms must be postmarked and mailed to the Settlement 

Administrator or uploaded to the Settlement Website no later than February 21, 2019 (“the Claim 

Deadline”).

(f) All written objections to the Agreement shall be filed with the Court no later than 

February 21, 2019 (“the Objection Deadline”).

(g) All Requests for Exclusion shall be postmarked and sent to the Settlement 

Administrator no later than February 21, 2019 (“the Opt Out Date”).

(h) All written notices of an objector’s intention to appear at the Fairness Hearing 

shall be filed with the Court no later than March 25, 2019.

(i) A Fairness Hearing shall be scheduled for April 1, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.

(j) Not later than seven (7) calendar days before the date of the Fairness Hearing, the 

Settlement Administrator shall file with the Court: (a) a list of those persons who have opted out 

or excluded themselves from the Settlement; and (b) the details regarding the number of valid 

Claim Forms received and processed by the Settlement Administrator.

(k) Plaintiff’s motion in support of final approval of the Settlement shall be filed no 

later than February 25, 2019 and posted to the Settlement Website as soon as practicable 

Case 5:10-cv-05193-VKD Document 107 Filed 10/26/18 Page 9 of 11
- 10 -

AMENDED ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT 10-CV-05193-VKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

thereafter, and may be supplemented no later than seven (7) days prior to the Fairness Hearing.

15. Termination of Settlement. In the event the Court does not grant final approval of 

the Settlement, or for any reason the Parties fail to obtain a Final Order and Final Judgment as 

contemplated in the Agreement, or the Agreement is terminated pursuant to its terms for any 

reason or the Effective Date does not occur for any reason, then the following shall apply:

(a) All orders and findings entered in connection with the Agreement shall become 

null and void and have no force and effect whatsoever, shall not be used or referred to for any 

purposes whatsoever, and shall not be admissible or discoverable in this or any other proceeding;

(b) The conditional certification of the Class pursuant to this Order shall be vacated 

automatically, and the Action shall proceed as though the Class had never been certified pursuant 

to this Agreement and such findings had never been made;

(c) Nothing contained in this Order is, or may be construed as, a presumption, 

concession or admission by or against US Airways or Plaintiff of any default, liability or 

wrongdoing as to any facts or claims alleged or asserted in the Action, or in any actions or 

proceedings, whether civil, criminal or administrative, including, but not limited to, factual or 

legal matters relating to any effort to certify the Action as a class action;

(d) Nothing in this Order or pertaining to the Agreement, including any of the 

documents or statements generated or received pursuant to the claims administration process, 

shall be used as evidence in any further proceeding in this case, including, but not limited to, 

motions or proceedings seeking treatment of the Action as a class action;

(e) Nothing is this Order or pertaining to the Agreement is, or may be construed as, a 

presumption, concession or admission by or against US Airways that the Action meets the 

requisites for certification as a class action under federal or California law; and

(f) All of the Court’s prior Orders having nothing whatsoever to do with the 

Agreement shall, subject to this Order, remain in force and effect.

16. Use of Order. This Order shall be of no force or effect if the Settlement does not 

become final and shall not be construed or used as an admission, concession, or declaration by or 

Case 5:10-cv-05193-VKD Document 107 Filed 10/26/18 Page 10 of 11
- 11 -

AMENDED ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT 10-CV-05193-VKD 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

against US Airways of any fault, wrongdoing, breach, or liability, or that any of the claims 

asserted in the Action meet the requisites for certification as a class action under federal or 

California law. Nor shall this Order be construed or used as an admission, concession, or 

declaration by or against Plaintiff or the other Class Members that their claims lack merit or that 

the relief requested is inappropriate, improper, or unavailable, or as a waiver by any Party of any 

defenses or claims he, she, or it may have in the Action or in any other lawsuit.

17. Alteration of Exhibits. Class Counsel and Defense Counsel are hereby authorized 

to use all reasonable procedures to further the administration of the Settlement that are not 

materially inconsistent with this Order or the Agreement, including making, without further 

approval of the Court, minor changes to the form or content of the Long Form Notice, Summary 

Notice, and other exhibits that they jointly agree are reasonable or necessary.

18. Retaining Jurisdiction. This Court shall maintain continuing jurisdiction over these 

Settlement proceedings to assure the effectuation thereof for the benefit of the Class, and for any 

other necessary purpose.

19. Extension of Deadlines. Upon application of the Parties and good cause shown, the 

deadlines set forth in this Order may be extended by order of the Court, without further notice to 

the Class. Class Members should check the Settlement Website regularly for updates and further 

details regarding Settlement deadlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 26, 2018

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:10-cv-05193-VKD Document 107 Filed 10/26/18 Page 11 of 11