Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05335/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-05335-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND

GRANTING EXTENSION TO FILE ANSWER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

E. Patrick Ellisen (State Bar No. 142033)

ellisenp@gtlaw.com

Daniel T. McCloskey (State Bar No. 191944)

mccloskeyd@gtlaw.com

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

1900 University Avenue, 5

th

Floor

East Palo Alto, California 94303

Telephone: (650) 328-8500

Facsimile: (650) 328-8508

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MiTAC INTERNATIONAL CORP.

Robert Steinberg (State Bar No. 126407)

bob.steinberg@lw.com

Amos E. Hartston (State Bar No. 186471)

amos.hartston@lw.com

LATHAM & WATKINS

633 W Fifth Street, Suite 4000

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 485-1234

Facsimile: (213) 891-8763

Attorneys for Defendants

BROADCOM CORP., BROADCOM ASIA

DISTRIBUTION PTE. LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MiTAC INTERNATIONAL CORP.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BROADCOM CORP., BROADCOM ASIA

DISTRIBUTION PTE. LTD.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C05-05335 RS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE AND GRANTING

EXTENSION TO FILE ANSWER

*E-FILED 10/18/06*

Case 5:05-cv-05335-RS Document 16 Filed 10/18/06 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND

GRANTING EXTENSION TO FILE ANSWER

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2(a), by and

between Plaintiff MiTAC International Corp. (“MiTAC”) and Defendants Broadcom Corp. and

Broadcom Asia Distribution PTE, Ltd. (“Broadcom Defendants”) (referred to collectively herein

as the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, as follows:

1. Pursuant to the Parties’ previous stipulation, and by Order dated August 23, 2006,

the Court rescheduled certain dates in this action including setting a Case Management

Conference for November 1, 2006 at 2:30 p.m.

2. The requested further extensions are necessary to allow the Parties adequate time

to discuss the potential for settlement of this matter without further litigation. Various

scheduling and logistical issues, including traveling of certain representatives of Defendants, and

Plaintiff’s location in Taiwan, have required additional time to schedule and hold meaningful

settlement discussions. A further settlement meeting is scheduled for early November, and will

include decision-makers from both Parties and their counsel. The Parties jointly request this

further accommodation by the Court.

3. Three previous time modifications in this case have been sought and granted, by

Stipulation filed April 21, 2006 and Order dated April 21, 2006, Stipulation filed June 14, 2006

and Order dated June 15, 2006, and by Stipulation dated August 23, 2006 and Order dated

August 23, 2006.

4. The Court has not previously been requested to extend the time for filing an

Answer. Service on the Broadcom Defendants was effectuated by Waiver of Service of

Summons pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d), sent August 7, 2006.

5. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for November 1, 2006 at

2:30 p.m. shall be rescheduled to December 13, 2006 at 2:30 p.m.

6. The last day to file Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR Process or

Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference, and the last day to file consent or declination,

complete initial disclosures, file/serve Case Management Statement, and file/serve Rule 26(f)

Report, shall be extended to November 29, 2006.

7. The last day to meet and confer regarding initial disclosures, early settlement,

Case 5:05-cv-05335-RS Document 16 Filed 10/18/06 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND

GRANTING EXTENSION TO FILE ANSWER

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ADR process selection, and discovery plan shall be extended to November 27, 2006.

8. Defendants’ Answer to the Complaint shall be due on November 15, 2006.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 6, 2006 GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP

By /s/

Daniel T. McCloskey

Attorneys for Plaintiff MiTAC Corp.

Dated: October 6, 2006 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

By /s/

Amos E. Hartston

Attorneys for Defendants

Broadcom Corp., Broadcom Asia

Distribution PTE. Ltd.

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by

a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.

Dated: October 6, 2006 By: /s/

Daniel T. McCloskey

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

United States Magistrate Judge 

October 10, 2006

Case 5:05-cv-05335-RS Document 16 Filed 10/18/06 Page 3 of 3