Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00331/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00331-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

A.D. WEBB,

Petitioner,

v.

RANDY GROUNDS, Warden,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:11-cv-00331-AWI-BAM HC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

RECOMMENDING THAT THE COURT 

DISMISS THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

HABEAS CORPUS AS MOOT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 15, 2015, the Court took judicial notice that the 

website of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation no longer lists Petitioner as a 

CDCR inmate and directed the parties to file status reports on or before October 9, 2015.

On October 7, 2015, Respondent filed a status report in which he reported that Petitioner was 

released from the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation on October 

13, 2014, and placed on probation for three years. Petitioner's whereabouts are currently unknown, 

and he is no longer under supervision. Respondent states that unless Petitioner demonstrates that he 

is subject to "concrete and continuing injury" (Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998)), the Court 

should dismiss the petition as moot.

Petitioner has not responded to the Court's order for status report in any way. He has not 

provided the Court with his change of address since his release from custody more than a year ago.

Case 1:11-cv-00331-AWI-BAM Document 30 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Conclusion and Recommendation

The undersigned recommends that the Court dismiss the above-entitled petition for writ of 

habeas corpus as moot.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C ' 636(b)(1). Within thirty (30) days

after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, either party may file written 

objections with the Court. The document should be captioned AObjections to Magistrate Judge's 

Findings and Recommendations.@ The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may constitute waiver of the right to appeal the District Court's order. Wilkerson v. 

Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 ((9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 

1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 14, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00331-AWI-BAM Document 30 Filed 10/14/15 Page 2 of 2