Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00173/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00173-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1640 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEYNE FERNANDEZ and 

JOSE J. FERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-10-0173 MCE GGH PS

vs.

DEUTSCHE BANK

NATIONAL, et al.,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed May 27, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen

days, why his action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 4(m). The fourteen day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Case 2:10-cv-00173-MCE -GGH Document 11 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 3, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

fernandez.fsc

Case 2:10-cv-00173-MCE -GGH Document 11 Filed 08/04/10 Page 2 of 2