Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-02027/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-02027-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OMNIBUS STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 1

Maurice B. VerStandig, Esq.

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

The VerStandig Law Firm, LLC

9812 Falls Road, #114-160

Potomac, Maryland 20854

Telephone: 301-444-4600

Facsimile: 301-576-6885

E-mail: mac@mbvesq.com

Counsel for the Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VERONICA BRILL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MICHAEL L. POSTLE, et al.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:19-cv-02027-MCE-AC

The Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr.

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

TIME FOR MICHAEL POSTLE TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

THEREON

Complaint Filed: October 8, 2019

Plaintiffs Veronica Brill et al. (“Plaintiffs”), by and through counsel and Defendant 

Michael Postle (“Postle”), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

First, that Postle and Plaintiffs have previously stipulated to extend the deadline of Postle 

to respond to the Complaint herein to February 26, 2020 (DE #20); 

Second, that all parties desire additional time to respond, with Postle expressly requesting 

such time in light of his pro se status;

Third, that Plaintiffs desire to have all responses to the Complaint filed in substantially 

contemporaneous fashion for reasons correlative to the timing structure of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure and the preservation of certain rights enumerated therein; 

Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Postle hereby stipulate (i) Postle’s response to the Complaint 

shall come due on March 24, 2020; (ii) Postle shall not file a response to the Complaint prior to 

Case 2:19-cv-02027-WBS-AC Document 29 Filed 03/02/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OMNIBUS STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - 2

March 4, 2020; and (iii) no party shall assert lack of timeliness as a grounds of opposition to any 

responsive paper if filed after March 4, 2020 and by March 24, 2020. 

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February 25, 2020 THE VERSTANDIG LAW FIRM, LLC

By: /s/ Maurice B. VerStandig

Maurice B. VerStandig (pro hac vice)

The VerStandig Law Firm, LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: February 25, 2020 ___________/s/__________

 Michael Postle (in propia persona)

ORDER

The Court, having considered the parties’ foregoing stipulation to extend the time for 

various defendants to respond to the Complaint herein, and finding good cause therefore, hereby 

orders:

The deadline for Postle to respond to the Complaint herein shall be enlarged to March 24, 

2020, and Postle may not file such a response prior to March 4, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 28, 2020

Case 2:19-cv-02027-WBS-AC Document 29 Filed 03/02/20 Page 2 of 2