Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01382/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01382-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jorge Ernesto Madueno, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-13-01382-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

 Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

2254 on July 10, 2013 raising one ground for relief. Petitioner alleges that the state violated 

his federal due process rights by breaching a term of the plea agreement. Respondents filed 

their Response to Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on March 3, 2014. No 

reply was filed. On April 18, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and 

Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. 

 In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation 

within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such 

objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been 

filed. 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. 

/ / / 

Case 2:13-cv-01382-SRB Document 20 Filed 05/20/14 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the order of this Court. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied 

and dismissed with prejudice. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because the dismissal of the Petition is justified 

by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling 

debatable. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

 Dated this 20th day of May, 2014. 

 

Case 2:13-cv-01382-SRB Document 20 Filed 05/20/14 Page 2 of 2