Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01450/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01450-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Meilinda Irsan,

Petitioner, 

vs.

Katrina Kane, et al., 

 Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-1450-PHX-MHM (MHB)

ORDER

Petitioner filed her Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241

on August 6, 2008. On August 22, 2008 and August 27, 2008, Respondents filed their

responses to Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. On September 22, 2008,

Petitioner filed a Motion to Dismiss Case. On September 29, 2008, the Magistrate Judge

issued her Report and Recommendation recommending that the Petitioner’s Motion to

Dismiss be granted and that the petition be dismissed as moot and without prejudice. 

In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Failure to timely file objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge

/ / / 

Case 2:08-cv-01450-MHM Document 30 Filed 10/17/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

may be considered a waiver of a party’s right to de novo consideration of the issues. See

United States v. Reyna-Tapia 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

After a complete and independent review of the issues presented, the Court finds itself

in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court [doc. 29]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss is granted 

[doc. 27]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed

without prejudice [doc. 1]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 15th day of October, 2008.

Case 2:08-cv-01450-MHM Document 30 Filed 10/17/08 Page 2 of 2