Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02361/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02361-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODERICK OHLSEN, )

) 2:06-cv-2361-GEB-GGH

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN; SAN JOAQUIN )

SHERIFF BAXTER DUNN; SAN JOAQUIN )

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY ROBERT )

SEMILLO; SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY )

SHERIFF’S SERGEANT JONES; and SAN )

JOAQUIN COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY )

NESBITT, )

)

Defendants. )

)

In light of the order granting in part Plaintiff’s

reconsideration motion, Section VI of the Final Pretrial Order filed

April 24, 2008 is amended to state:

Case 2:06-cv-02361-GEB-GGH Document 54 Filed 06/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. Whether Defendants SEMILLO, JONES and/or NESBITT used

excessive force in violation of Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment right

against unreasonable seizure when using the dog to apprehend

Plaintiff.

2. Whether the COUNTY is liable for the use of excessive

force against Plaintiff under the Fourth Amendment (a) based on the

failure to re-warn Plaintiff that the dog would be released after the

officers entered Plaintiff’s residence, and/or (b) based on an

officer’s use of the dog to apprehend Plaintiff.

3. What damages Plaintiff may recover on his Fourth

Amendment warrantless entry and unlawful arrest claims against the

COUNTY.

4. What damages Plaintiff may recover on his California

Civil Code section 52.1(b) claims against the COUNTY based on the

warrantless entry and unlawful arrest.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 3, 2008

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-02361-GEB-GGH Document 54 Filed 06/04/08 Page 2 of 2