Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01672/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01672-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

B O I E S , S C H I L L E R & F L E X N E R L L P

O A K L A N D , C A L I F O R N I A

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Case No. 16-cv-01672

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER CHANGING TIME

FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

David Boies (admitted pro hac vice)

Edward J. Normand (admitted pro hac vice)

333 Main Street 

Armonk, NY 10504

Telephone: (914) 749-8200

Facsimile: (914) 749-8300

E-mail: dboies@bsfllp.com

E-mail: enormand@bsfllp.com

Andrew Z. Michaelson (admitted pro hac vice)

575 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Telephone: (212) 446-2300

Facsimile: (212) 446-2350

E-mail: amichaelson@bsfllp.com

Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson (CA Bar No. 238027)

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 874-1000

Facsimile: (510) 874-1460

E-mail: brichardson@bsfllp.com

Attorneys for Defendants VA Partners I, LLC, ValueAct Capital 

Master Fund, L.P. and ValueAct Co-Invest International, L.P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

-againstVA PARTNERS I, LLC, 

VALUEACT CAPITAL MASTER FUND, 

L.P. and VALUEACT CO-INVEST 

INTERNATIONAL, L.P.

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-01672 (WHA)

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER 

CHANGING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND 

MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING

Complaint Filed: April 4, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-01672-WHA Document 35 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 2
B O I E S , S C H I L L E R & F L E X N E R L L P

O A K L A N D , C A L I F O R N I A

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 16-cv-01672

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER CHANGING TIME

FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING

The Court has reviewed the parties’ Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time. The 

parties’ stipulated request is GRANTED. The Court sets the following dates and deadlines: 

1. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by July 6, 2016;

2. If Defendants move to dismiss the complaint, Plaintiff shall file its opposition to 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss by August 5, 2016; and

3. Defendants shall file their reply brief, if any, by August 15, 2016.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___________________ _________________________

Hon. William Alsup

United States District Judge

May 27, 2016.

Case 3:16-cv-01672-WHA Document 35 Filed 07/01/16 Page 2 of 2