Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02631/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02631-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT ALAN GIBBS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BOYD, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-CV-2631-KJM-CMK 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. The matter was 

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Eastern District of California local rules. 

 On August 10, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, 

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 

within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:13-cv-02631-KJM-DMC Document 71 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 10, 2016, are adopted in 

full; and 

 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 59) is denied. 

DATED: September 26, 2016. 

Case 2:13-cv-02631-KJM-DMC Document 71 Filed 09/27/16 Page 2 of 2