Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-01288/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-01288-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

MINUTES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 DOKTOREZTK v. MORALES ET AL No. 09-CV-1288-JM(WVG) 

HON. WILLIAM V. GALLO CT. DEPUTY J. YAHL RPTR. 

Attorneys

Plaintiffs Defendants

 

Plaintiff’s Application For Enlargement of Time To Serve Specific

Discovery Requests (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 

For good cause shown, Plaintiff may provide a list of expert witnesses

expected to be called at trial by March 3, 2010. 

Plaintiff’s request to serve interrogatories, document production

requests, and request for admissions is misplaced. These discovery requests are

controlled by the discovery cut off date in the scheduling order issued by Judge

Brooks on October 7, 2009. Under this operative scheduling order (Doc. No. 13),

the discovery cut off is April 5, 2010. Plaintiff has until this date to complete

discovery by methods including interrogatories, document production requests, and

requests for admission. “Complete” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must be initiated a sufficient period of

time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off

date, taking into account the times for services, notice, and response as set

forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, Plaintiff must serve

all discovery on defendants no later than March 5, 2010. 

DATED: February 22, 2010

 Hon. William V. Gallo

 U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01288-JM-WVG Document 18 Filed 02/22/10 Page 1 of 1