Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00951/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00951-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT YOUNG,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-0951 FCD JFM P

vs.

PETER BRESLER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 20, 2005, plaintiff filed a document styled as objections to the

magistrate judge’s order filed December 6, 2005, denying plaintiff’s request for an extension of

time to file a motion to compel discovery responses. This court construes plaintiff’s objections

as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s December 6, 2005 order. Pursuant to

E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous

or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:03-cv-00951-FCD-JFM Document 70 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed December 6, 2005, is affirmed. 

DATED:January 25, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-00951-FCD-JFM Document 70 Filed 01/25/06 Page 2 of 2