Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02079/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02079-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. C 07-02079-PVT 

COUNSEL OF RECORD LISTED 

ON SIGNATURE PAGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CLINTON BEACHAM, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

SYNOPSYS, INC., a corporation, and DOES 1 

through 10, 

Defendant.

Case No. C-07-02079-PVT 

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel of record report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have 

reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

1. The parties agree to participate in private mediation before Mediator Mark Rudy of Rudy 

Exelrod & Zieff LLP: 

2. The parties agree to hold the ADR session on May 17, 2007. In the event mediation 

continues beyond said date, the mediation process is to be completed by June 15, 2007 

unless further extended by Stipulation and Order. 

/ / / 

/ / /

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

XXXXXXXXXX

Case 5:07-cv-02079-PVT Document 8 Filed 05/15/07 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK & WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS 2 CASE NO. C 07-02079-PVT 

Dated: May 11, 2007 McGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 

By: /s/ Cliff Palefsky 

Cliff Palefsky 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

CLINTON BEACHAM 

Dated: May 11, 2007 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Allen Kato 

Allen Kato 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SYNOPSYS, INC. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

 __ Non-binding Arbitration 

 __ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 

 __ Mediation 

X_ Private ADR 

 Deadline for ADR session: 

 __ 90 days from the date of this order. 

X_ other: Mediation process to be completed by June 15, 2007 unless further 

extended by Stipulation and Order. 

 Participation in the private mediation shall be substituted for and shall satisfy any 

obligation of the parties to participate in a Court ADR program, including as allowed by ADR 

L.R. 3-4(b). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May __, 2007 By:

HON. PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL 

Chief Magistrate Judge 

United States District Court

Northern District Of California 

14

Case 5:07-cv-02079-PVT Document 8 Filed 05/15/07 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK & WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS 3 CASE NO. C 07-02079-PVT 

 I hereby attest that I obtained the concurrence of Cliff Palesky, Esq., in the filing of this 

stipulation and that I will maintain a record of such concurrence until one year after resolution of 

this action. 

Dated: May 11, 2007 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Allen Kato 

Allen Kato 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SYNOPSYS, INC. 

Case 5:07-cv-02079-PVT Document 8 Filed 05/15/07 Page 3 of 3