Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05958/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05958-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ADMITTING

THE RECORD FROM INTERFERENCE NO. 105,285

CASE NO. C 06-05958 JW (PVT)

Thomas H. Jenkins (Pro Hac Vice) 

tom.jenkins@finnegan.com 

Tina E. Hulse (CA Bar No. 232936) 

tina.hulse@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

Stanford Research Park 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Michael J. Malecek (CA Bar No. 171034) 

Michael_Malecek@Affymetrix.com 

Stephen C. Holmes (CA Bar No. 200727) 

Stephen_Holmes@Affymetrix.com 

AFFYMETRIX, INC. 

6550 Vallejo Street, Suite 100 

Emeryville, California 94608-1112 

Telephone : (510) 428-8503 

Facsimile : (510) 428-8583 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AFFYMETRIX, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AFFYMETRIX, INC. 

Defendant. 

 CASE NO. C 06-05958 JW (PVT) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER ADMITTING THE RECORD 

FROM INTERFERENCE NO. 105,285 

IN THIS CASE, PURSUANT TO 

35 U.S.C. § 146 

Case 5:06-cv-05958-JW Document 31 Filed 06/05/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ADMITTING

THE RECORD FROM INTERFERENCE NO. 105,285

CASE NO. C 06-05958 JW (PVT)

WHEREAS this case is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 146 by Plaintiff Agilent Technologies, 

Inc. (“Agilent”) from the Decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent 

Appeals and Interferences (“the Board”) on June 28, 2006, in Patent Interference No. 105,285 (“the 

Interference”). 

WHEREAS the parties have agreed and stipulated to jointly submit the record from the 

Interference, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146, which provides in relevant part: 

In such suits the record in the Patent and Trademark Office shall be admitted on 

motion of either party upon the terms and conditions as to costs, expenses, and the 

further cross-examination of the witnesses as the court imposes, without prejudice to 

the right of the parties to take further testimony. The testimony and exhibits of the 

record in the Patent and Trademark Office when admitted shall have the same effect 

as if originally taken and produced in the suit. 

35 U.S.C. § 146. 

WHEREAS the record to be submitted by the parties includes the parties’ motions and 

supporting briefs and exhibits, cases cited by the parties, other papers, notices and orders from the 

Interference, transcripts of hearings before the Board in the Interference and cases cited by the 

Board. 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to and 

request that the Court approve and enter the proposed order as the order of this Court. 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X.B, the electronic filer of this document attests under 

penalty of perjury that he/she has the concurrence of each of the signatories to this “Stipulation and 

[Proposed] Order Admitting The Record From Interference No. 105,285 In This Case, Pursuant To 

35 U.S.C. § 146.” 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

Case 5:06-cv-05958-JW Document 31 Filed 06/05/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ADMITTING

THE RECORD FROM INTERFERENCE NO. 105,285

CASE NO. C 06-05958 JW (PVT)

Dated: June 1, 2007 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

By: /s/ Tina E. Hulse 

Tina E. Hulse 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Dated: June 1, 2007 AFFYMETRIX, INC. 

By: /s/ Stephen C. Holmes 

Stephen C. Holmes 

Attorneys for Defendants 

AFFYMETRIX, INC. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146, the record from Patent Interference No. 105,285 shall be 

admitted into evidence in this case, and the testimony and exhibits of record in the Patent and 

Trademark Office shall have the same effect as if originally taken and produced in this case. 

Dated: _______________________ _______________________________ 

 The Honorable James Ware 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

June 5, 2007

Case 5:06-cv-05958-JW Document 31 Filed 06/05/07 Page 3 of 3