Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05713/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05713-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUSSELL DWAYNE ROGERS,

Plaintiff, CV F 02 5713 OWW WMW P

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

DERRAL ADAMS, , et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se. On May 10, 2005, an order

was entered, dismissing the operative complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff was granted

leave to file an amended complaint to correct the identified deficiencies. Plaintiff failed to file an

amended complaint, and the court recommended that this action be dismissed for his failure to

do so. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In his objections, plaintiff

states that he did not receive the May 10, 2005, order dismissing the complaint.

On July 7, 2005, an order was entered, vacating the recommendation of dismissal

and directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint that addressed the deficiencies identified in

the earlier order dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff has failed to do so within the time allotted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

Case 1:02-cv-05713-OWW -WMW Document 33 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time waives all objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See Turner v. Duncan, 158

F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the

right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 26, 2005 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05713-OWW -WMW Document 33 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 2