Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01677/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01677-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL A. SERRATO, 1:06-CV- 1677 AWI LJO P 

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SUBMIT NEW

APPLICATION TO PROCEED

vs. IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR

PAY FILING FEE

W. J. SULLIVAN, et al.,

Defendants. 

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915 and a copy of his prison trust account statement. However, plaintiff’s application

to proceed in forma pauperis was missing page two of the application containing plaintiff's

signature, and the required original signature of an authorized officer of the institution of

incarceration . Each document submitted for filing must include the original signature of the

filing party or parties. Local Rule 7-131; F.R.C.P. 11(a). Plaintiff will be provided the

opportunity to submit a new application to proceed in forma pauperis which includes his original

signature, or pay the $350.00 filing fee.

Case 1:06-cv-01677-AWI-LJO Document 6 Filed 01/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to plaintiff the form for application to proceed in

forma pauperis.

2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit a

completed application to proceed in forma pauperis which includes his original signature, or in

the alternative, pay the $350.00 filing fee. Plaintiff is not required to re-submit a certified copy

of his prison trust account statement. Failure to comply with this order will result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b6edp0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01677-AWI-LJO Document 6 Filed 01/30/07 Page 2 of 2