Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05171/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05171-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

– 1 – US_ACTIVE-104083077.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS 

TO DISMISS

Jayne E. Fleming (SBN 209026)

James M. Wood (SBN 58679) 

Mary Oppedahl (SBN 111119)

Ray Cardozo (SBN 173263)

Amy Lifson-Leu (SBN 260062)

Katie B. Annand (SBN 260343)

REED SMITH LLP

101 Second Street, Suite 1800

San Francisco, CA 94105-3659

Telephone: +1 415 543 8700

Facsimile: +1 415 391 8269

Barry Thompson (SBN 150349)

REED SMITH LLP

355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: +1 213 457 8000

Facsimile: +1 213 457 8080

Attorneys for DORA BAIRES, individually, and 

on behalf the estate of JUAN CARLOS 

BAIRES; and Teofilo MIRANDA, an 

individual.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DORA BAIRES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,

Defendants.

No.: C 09-05171 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING 

DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS 

TO DISMISS

Case 3:09-cv-05171-CRB Document 72 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 3
REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

– 2 – US_ACTIVE-104083077.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS 

TO DISMISS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-7, Plaintiffs Dora Baires and Teofilo Miranda (“Plaintiffs”) and 

Defendants United States of America, Janet Napolitano, John P. Torres, James T. Hayes, Nancy

Alcantar, Jeffrey Sherman, Jose Rodriguez, and Timothy Shack (collectively “Federal 

Defendants”), through their respective counsel of record, agree and stipulate to a continuance of the 

hearing date on the Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as follows:

1. On June 11, 2010, the Federal Defendants filed the Individual Federal Defendants’ 

Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. 

2. On June 12, 2010, the Federal Defendants filed the United States’ Amended Notice 

of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (“Individual 

Federal Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Or, in the Alternative, for Summary

Judgment” and “Amended Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for 

Summary Judgment” collectively herein “Motions to Dismiss”).

3. On June 12, 2010, the Federal Defendants filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order 

setting forth a briefing schedule for the Motions to Dismiss, proposing a hearing date of July 16, 

2010. 

4. On June 21, 2010, the Court entered the order setting the hearing date on the 

Motions to Dismiss for July 16, 2010.

5. On July 7, 2010, the Court notified the parties that it continued the hearing date on 

the Motions to Dismiss to August 6, 2010.

6. Jayne Fleming is the lead attorney for Plaintiffs and she will argue the motions. She 

will be leading a human rights mission in Haiti from July 27, 2010 through August 4, 2010. She 

will not return to California until August 7, 2010. Two other human-rights experts (Karen Musalo 

and Robert Rubin) will be part of this mission and they have already blocked out these dates and 

purchased their tickets for the trip. Changing the dates would pose extreme difficulty.

7. Defendants do not oppose the continuance of the hearing on their Motions to 

Dismiss. 

8. Counsel for Defendants, Abraham Simmons, is available on August 13, 2010 and 

Case 3:09-cv-05171-CRB Document 72 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 3
REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

– 3 – US_ACTIVE-104083077.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS 

TO DISMISS

August 27, 2010. Plaintiffs are also available on these dates.

9. The parties have fully briefed the Motions to Dismiss.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties through their 

respective counsel of record that:

The hearing on the Federal Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss be continued to August 13, 

2010, or in the alternative, to August 27, 2010. Any continuance of the hearing date will not affect 

any briefing deadlines, as the matter is fully briefed. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED

DATED: July 8, 2010.

REED SMITH LLP

By /s/ Jayne Fleming

Jayne Fleming

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED: July 8, 2010.

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

By /s/ Abraham Simmons

Abraham Simmons

Assistant United States Attorney

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED ____________, 2010.

________________________________

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

United States District Court Judge

July 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-05171-CRB Document 72 Filed 07/12/10 Page 3 of 3