Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02948/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02948-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. Req. & [Prop.] Order to Continue Mediation Deadline

Case No. C 06-2948 VRW -1-

MAY ANTOINETTE G. TEODORO (California Bar No. 169494)

M.G. TEODORO LAW

1625 The Alameda, Suite 800

San Jose, California 95126

Telephone: (408) 491-9756

Facsimile: (408) 491-9760

Email: mgteodoro@aol.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PAT DELOS SANTOS

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (South Carolina Bar No. 9990)

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON (California Bar No. 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

LETITIA R. KIM (California Bar No. 200142)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-7181

Facsimile: (415) 436-6748

Email: letitia.r.kim@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

JOHN E. POTTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PAT DELOS SANTOS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN E. POTTER,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 06-2948 VRW

STIPULATED REQUEST AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE

MEDIATION DEADLINE

STIPULATED REQUEST

The mediation deadline in this case is currently scheduled for July 28, 2007. To meet that

deadline, the parties scheduled the mediation for July 20 and the plaintiff’s deposition for June

19, and at plaintiff’s request, defense counsel booked a certified Tagalog-English interpreter for

Case 3:06-cv-02948-VRW Document 31 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:06-cv-02948-VRW Document 32 Filed 07/24/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. Req. & [Prop.] Order to Continue Mediation Deadline

Case No. C 06-2948 VRW -2-

the deposition. The day before the deposition, the interpreting firm contacted defense counsel

and stated they had made a mistake, and the interpreter was unavailable on June 19. Apparently,

that interpreter is the only certified Tagalog-English interpreter in the district. Defense counsel

has made several attempts to reschedule the deposition, but has been unable to do so thus far

because the interpreter’s schedule is apparently very limited at this time.

After conferring, the parties agree that mediation cannot be productive without the

plaintiff’s deposition. Furthermore, plaintiff’s counsel has two upcoming jury trials in the fall for

which she must prepare in the late summer and fall. Accordingly, the parties jointly and

respectfully request that the Court continue the mediation deadline to December 14, 2007. Trial

in this action has not yet been scheduled.

Dated: July 19, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney

/s/

 

LETITIA R. KIM

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

M.G. TEODORO LAW

/s/

 

MAY ANTOINETTE G. TEODORO

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-02948-VRW Document 31 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:06-cv-02948-VRW Document 32 Filed 07/24/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. Req. & [Prop.] Order to Continue Mediation Deadline

Case No. C 06-2948 VRW -3-

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause having been shown, the Court hereby

continues the mediation deadline to December 14, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:______________________ 

VAUGHN R. WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:06-cv-02948-VRW Document 31 Filed 07/19/2007 Page 3 of 3

July 24, 2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:06-cv-02948-VRW Document 32 Filed 07/24/07 Page 3 of 3