Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01098/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01098-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Ketchum, et al. v. City of Vallejo

Extending Time CIV-S-05-1098 DFL JFM

DAVID P. MASTAGNI, ESQ. (SBN 57721)

DAVID E. MASTAGNI, ESQ. (SBN 204244)

WILL M. YAMADA, ESQ. (SBN 226669)

MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK, 

MILLER, JOHNSEN & UHRHAMMER 

A Professional Corporation

1912 “I” Street

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 446-4692

Facsimile: (916) 447-4614

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WYNATHEN KETHCUM, ANA

MENJIVAR, acting for themselves and

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF VALLEJO,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: CIV-S-05-1098 DFL JFM

AMENDED STIPULATION AND 

ORDER RE EXTENDING TIME OF

VDRP COMPLETION

1. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above-entitled action, by

their respective counsel, that the date to complete the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP)

shall be extended.

2. On October 7, 2005, the parties were referred to Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program

(VDRP). 

3. The parties were assigned a neutral on November 30, 2005. Pursuant to the Local Rules the

parties are to complete the VDRP within ninety (90) days. 

4. The parties believe VDRP is appropriate for this case and wish to pursue VDRP as an option

in this matter.

/ /

Case 2:05-cv-01098-JAM -JFM Document 28 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Ketchum, et al. v. City of Vallejo

Extending Time -2- CIV-S-05-1098 DFL JFM

5. The previous Proposed Order extending VDRP signed by this Court on April 6, 2006 was

submitted to this Court in error, and did not accurately reflect the Parties’ stipulation. 

6. Modification of the schedule will enable the parties to continue with discovery.

7. The requested time modification will minimally affect the schedule of the case and will not

postpone any additional dates set in the pretrial scheduling order. 

8. The parties therefore request the date the parties are to complete VDRP be set for August 30,

2006.

MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK,

MILLER, JOHNSEN & UHRHAMMER

Dated: April 7, 2006

By: 

DAVID E. MASTAGNI,

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: April 7, 2006

By: /s/ - Claudia Quintana 

CLAUDIA QUINTANA,

Attorney for Defendant

 ORDER

The Stipulation and Order Extending Time to Complete the VDRP Program Is Hereby Adopted

by the Court for the Case and the Parties Are Ordered to Comply with this Order. 

Dated: 4/11/06 /s/ David F. Levi 

HONORABLE DAVID F. LEVI

Case 2:05-cv-01098-JAM -JFM Document 28 Filed 04/11/06 Page 2 of 2