Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01055/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01055-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 28:2410 Quiet Title

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194

Assistant U. S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2760

Attorneys for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BEDROCK FINANCIAL, INC., a California

Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY and

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE

COMPANY, California Corporations,

Third-Party Defendants.

1:10-cv-1055-OWW-MJS

1:10-cv-2326-OWW-MJS

PARTIES' STIPULATION

AND ORDER RESETTING

ONE SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE TO

COINCIDE WITH THE

OTHER, AND EXTENDING

RESPONSE DATE

The parties to these two actions, related by Order filed December 28, 2010, have

preliminarily met and conferred in compliance with the Orders Setting Mandatory Scheduling

Conferences filed in the actions on June 11 and December 14, 2010. See certain parties' Joint

Scheduling Report filed October 7, 2010. The then parties (not including then-suspended

corporation Bedrock Financial, Inc.) timely exchanged initial disclosures. The parties believe

that these actions should be coordinated with one another. Currently, the United States'

response to the complaint in number 1:10-cv-2326 is not yet due, and the United States

PARTIES' STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING ONE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO COINCIDE WITH THE OTHER, AND EXTENDING RESPONSE DATE Page 1

Case 1:10-cv-01055-MJS Document 32 Filed 01/20/11 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

wishes to formulate its factual contentions for the required joint scheduling report after it has

responded to the complaint.

Also, the parties currently are discussing settlement of at least two of the claims in

these actions. They believe that their settlement efforts and judicial economy would be served

by conducting both Scheduling Conferences at the Scheduling Conference time in number

1:10-cv-2326. (There was one past 99-day continuance of the Scheduling Conference in

number 1:10-cv-1055, by minute order filed October 7, 2010.) To promote these settlement

efforts, the parties also agree that the United States' time to respond to the complaint in

number 1:10-cv-2326 be extended for an initial 30 days.

The parties therefore stipulate, subject to Court's approval, as follows:

1. That the United States accepted service of the summons and complaint in number

1:10-cv-2326 on December 17, 2010, making its response to the complaint due February 15,

2011.

2. That the time for the United States to respond to the complaint in number 1:10-cv2326, which has not been extended before this, be EXTENDED for an initial period of 30

days, from February 15 until March 17, 2011.

3. That the Scheduling Conference in number 1:10-cv-1055, currently set before Judge

Wanger by Minute Order filed October 7, 2010, for 8:15 AM on January 21, 2011, be

CONTINUED to coincide with the Scheduling Conference in number 1:10-cv-2326, set

before Judge Wanger by Order filed December 14, 2010, that is, until 8:15 AM on June 9,

2011.

4. That the time for filing and emailing of the Joint Scheduling Report accordingly be

June 2, 2011.

Dated: January 14, 2011 LAW OFFICES OF

MICHAEL J. LAMPE

By: /s/ Michael Smith

MICHAEL J. LAMPE

MICHAEL P. SMITH

MATTHEW D. OWDOM

PARTIES' STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING ONE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO COINCIDE WITH THE OTHER, AND EXTENDING RESPONSE DATE Page 2

Case 1:10-cv-01055-MJS Document 32 Filed 01/20/11 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: January 14, 2011 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: /s/ YHimel

YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL

Assistant U. S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 20, 2011 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PARTIES' STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING ONE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO COINCIDE WITH THE OTHER, AND EXTENDING RESPONSE DATE Page 3

Case 1:10-cv-01055-MJS Document 32 Filed 01/20/11 Page 3 of 3