Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01163/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01163-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH C. ZARCO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

J. WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-01163-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Joseph C. Zarco (“plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On December 8, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On

December 22, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.

Based on the objections, the Magistrate Judge granted

Case 1:05-cv-01163-OWW -LJO Document 11 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff additional time to comply with the Court order setting

forth a deadline of February 28, 2006 to either pay the filing

fee or submit a completed application to proceed in forma

pauperis. However, that deadline has since expired and Plaintiff

has still not complied with the Court Order.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed December 8,

2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on plaintiff’s failure

to obey the court’s order of October 18, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01163-OWW -LJO Document 11 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 2