Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05079/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05079-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HUNG D. NGUON,

Plaintiff,

v.

C/O CLARK, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 04 5079 AWI SMS P 

ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO STRIKE

DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION OF

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT (Doc. 47.) 

Hung D. Nguon (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Plaintiff filed the instant action on December 17, 2003, in the U.S. District Court for the

Central District of California. The action was transferred and received in this Court on January

14, 2004. 

On December 19, 2005, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Strike Defendant’s Opposition of

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.” A review of this pleading, however, reveals that

Plaintiff failed to serve Defendants with a copy of the Motion filed with the Court. Plaintiff has

been informed via the Court’s Information al Order as well as a more recent order, that pursuant

to the Local Rules and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all pleadings filed with the Court

Case 1:04-cv-05079-LJO -SMS Document 48 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

must be served on the opposing party. Local Rule 5-135(b); Fed.R.Civ.P. 5. However, despite

being informed of this requirement, Plaintiff did not serve Defendants with the Motion. 

Accordingly, in light of the above, the Court HEREBY ORDERS the Motion to Strike

Defendant’s Opposition from the Record is STRICKEN from the record for lack of service. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 21, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05079-LJO -SMS Document 48 Filed 12/21/05 Page 2 of 2