Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00833/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00833-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JORGE ANTONIO PEREZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

A. DENNEHY, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-0833-WBS-EFB P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On May 1, 2015, the court found that plaintiff had failed to pay the $400 filing 

fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or request leave to proceed in forma pauperis and submit the 

affidavit and trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the court 

ordered plaintiff to submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a) within 

thirty days and warned him that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed. The 

time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or submitted an application for 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:15-cv-00833-WBS-EFB Document 8 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: June 10, 2015. 

Case 2:15-cv-00833-WBS-EFB Document 8 Filed 06/11/15 Page 2 of 2