Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01777/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01777-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE;

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01777-EMC 

DM2\6832341.3

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

Karineh Khachatourian (CA SBN 202634) 

kkhachatourian@duanemorris.com 

Daniel T. McCloskey (CA SBN 191944) 

dtmccloskey@duanemorris.com 

Anjali Moorthy (CA SBN 299963) 

amoorthy@duanemorris.com 

2745 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194 

Telephone: 650.847.4150 

Facsimile: 650.847.4151 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

DYNATRACE LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DYNATRACE LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

JAMES RAMEY, an individual, and 

DEVICEBITS LLC, an Ohio limited 

liability company, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:16-cv-01777-EMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE 

ALTERNATIVE TO TRANSFER 

VENUE 

Hearing Date: July 28, 2016 

Time: 1:30 pm 

Ctrm: 5 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-01777-EMC Document 28 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE;

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01777-EMC 

DM2\6832341.3

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 (b), Plaintiff Dynatrace LLC. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants 

James Ramey and DeviceBits LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned 

attorneys, hereby state and stipulate, subject to Court approval, as follows: 

WHEREAS, on May 9, 2016, this Court issued an Order, pursuant to the parties’ stipulated 

request (D.I. 17), rescheduling the initial Case Management Conference in this matter from July 21, 

2016, at 9:30 a.m. to July 28, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. (see D.I. 19); 

WHEREAS, on May 24, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal 

Jurisdiction or Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue (the “Motion”), setting the 

oral hearing for July 14, 2016, for which Plaintiff’s Opposition brief would be due June 7, 2016 and 

Defendants’ Reply brief would be due June 14, 2016 (see D.I. 24); 

WHEREAS, on May 26, 2016, this Court sua sponte rescheduled the hearing on the Motion 

and the CMC for July 21, 2016 (see D.I. 25) and then issued an Amended notice rescheduling the 

hearing on the Motion and the CMC for July 28, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. (see D.I. 26); 

WHEREAS, during the time for Plaintiff to prepare its response to the Motion under the 

current briefing schedule, the Memorial Day Holiday weekend occurs and Plaintiff’s counsel has 

pre-scheduled travel plans; 

WHEREAS, the parties’ counsel have met and conferred and agreed to modify the briefing 

schedule for the Motion so that the parties’ time to file their respective briefs would each be 

extended by an additional week, as follows: 

 Plaintiff’s Opposition due: June 14, 2016 

 Defendants’ Reply due: June 28, 2016 

WHEREAS, the parties have previously stipulated to a 15 day extension of time for 

Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, to May 24, 2016 (see D.I, 16), and the 

Court previously granted the parties’ request to move the CMC by one week to July 28, 2016; 

WHEREAS, this requested continuance will not impact on the case management schedule, 

as no schedule has been adopted and no trial date has been set; 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to this Court’s 

approval, that the briefing schedule is modified so that the parties’ time to file their respective 

Case 3:16-cv-01777-EMC Document 28 Filed 05/31/16 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE;

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01777-EMC 

DM2\6832341.3

briefs are extended by an additional week, so that the new due dates for the briefs are as follows: 

 Plaintiff’s Opposition due: June 14, 2016 

 Defendants’ Reply due: June 28, 2016 

 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

Dated: May 27, 2016 By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian . 

 Karineh Khachatourian

Daniel T. McCloskey 

Anjali Moorthy 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

DYNATRACE LLC 

GORDON & REES LLP 

Dated: May 27, 2016 By: /s/ 

 Michael Pietrykowski 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

JAMES RAMEY and DEVICEBITS LLC

ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that 

the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

Dated: May 27, 2016 By: /s/ Karineh Khachatourian 

 Karineh Khachatourian

Daniel T. McCloskey 

Anjali Moorthy 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

DYNATRACE LLC 

ORDER 

Having read and considered the foregoing Stipulation of the parties submitted herewith and 

for good cause shown, 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated:________________ _______________________ 

Hon. Edward M. Chen 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

May 31, 2016

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-01777-EMC Document 28 Filed 05/31/16 Page 3 of 3