Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03118/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03118-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELIAS STAVRINIDES,

Plaintiff,

 v.

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC

COMPANY,

Defendant. /

No. C 15-03118 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

In this debt collection action, defendant PG&E filed a motion to dismiss on September

4. Pro se plaintiff Elias Stavrinides’ response was due on September 18. After plaintiff failed 

to file any response, Magistrate Judge Kandis Westmore, who then presided over the case,

issued an order for plaintiff to show cause, by October 15, as to why he did not timely respond

to defendant’s motion (Dkt. No. 18). Plaintiff did not respond to that order. By NOON ON

OCTOBER 27, 2015, plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, in writing, why this case should

not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. By the same date, plaintiff must also file either an

opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to respond, or to

show sufficient cause as to why plaintiff has not responded to previous orders, will result in

dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 19, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-03118-WHA Document 26 Filed 10/19/15 Page 1 of 1