Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00858/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00858-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

HUBBARD, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 1:10-cv-00858 LJO DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS 

HUBBARD, CATE, HARRINGTON, SOTO, 

GRISSOM, DAVIS, FOSTER, AND FREIR

[ECF Nos. 103]

Plaintiff Luis Valenzuela Rodriguez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 5, 2010. Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma 

pauperis, having paid the $350.00 filing fee on July 30, 2010. The matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 29, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 

recommended Defendants Hubbard, Cate, Harrington, Soto, Grissom, Davis, Foster, and Freir be 

DISMISSED from the action for failure to effect service. The Findings and Recommendation

was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within 

fourteen (14) days. On December 11, 2014, Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and 

Recommendation. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 

a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file including Plaintiff’s 

Case 1:10-cv-00858-DAD-SAB Document 108 Filed 12/16/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record 

and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation are 

ADOPTED in full. Defendants Hubbard, Cate, Harrington, Soto, Grissom, Davis, Foster, and 

Freir are DISMISSED from the action without prejudice for failure to effect service.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00858-DAD-SAB Document 108 Filed 12/16/14 Page 2 of 2