Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01491/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01491-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN MANUAL AGUILAR, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:06-CV-01491 OWW NEW (DLB) HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #5]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On January 22, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for failure to allege grounds that

would entitled Petitioner to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Findings and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation

were to be filed within ten court days (plus three days for mailing) of the date of service of the order. 

The time for filing objections has passed and no party has objected.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:06-cv-01491-LJO -LJO Document 7 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued January 22, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; 

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 25, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01491-LJO -LJO Document 7 Filed 02/26/07 Page 2 of 2