Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00576/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00576-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 “Doc.#” refers to the docket number of documents filed in this action.

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jeffrey J. Cantú, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Craig Apker,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-0576-PHX-SMM (GEE)

ORDER

Petitioner Jeffrey J. Cantú, who is confined in the Federal Correctional Institution in

Phoenix, Arizona, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody

(28 U.S.C. § 2241)(Petition) and a Memorandum in support thereof. (Doc.1, 3.)1

 The case

was referred to Magistrate Judge Glenda E. Edmonds for further proceedings and a Report

and Recommendation. On July 29, 2008, Magistrate Judge Edmonds filed the Report and

Recommendation. (Doc. 13.) To date, no objections have been filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see Baxter v. Sullivan,

923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). Parties have ten days from the service of a copy of the

Magistrate's recommendation within which to file specific written objections to the Court.

Case 2:08-cv-00576-SMM Document 14 Filed 08/26/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. Failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s

recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s

factual findings and waives all objections to those findings on appeal. See Turner v. Duncan,

158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). A failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s conclusion “is

a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal.”

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998).

DISCUSSION

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no

Objections having been made by any party thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and adopts

Magistrate Judge Edmond’s Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth herein,

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation

of Magistrate Judge Edmonds. (Doc. 13.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus. (Doc. 1.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall terminate this case

accordingly.

DATED this 26th day of August, 2008.

Case 2:08-cv-00576-SMM Document 14 Filed 08/26/08 Page 2 of 2