Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04601/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04601-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER—CASE NO. 14-04601-WHO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

COLLEEN GALLAGHER, ILANA FARAR, 

ANDREA LOPEZ, JOANN CORDARO, and 

ROSANNE COSGROVE, on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BAYER AG, BAYER CORPORATION, and 

BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-04601-WHO

STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT 

ORDER

 On December 8, 2015, the Court held a case management conference, at which the parties 

presented an agreement on discovery and scheduling. Consistent with that agreement and the 

Court’s Civil Minutes (Dkt. 90), the Court ORDERS as follows. 

1. Defendants shall produce the following documents by January 8, 2016: 

 Additional representative public scientific studies 

 Medical point of view memos 

 Labels 

 Promotional materials (TV, print, radio, point of sale advertisements) 

 Legal/medical/regulatory signoffs 

 FDA notification letters 

 Consumer complaints and responses to consumer complaints 

Case 3:14-cv-04601-WHO Document 92 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER—CASE NO. 14-04601-WHO 

 Sales and financial data 

 Names of third-party agents/consultants involved with the products at issue 

 Document retention notices and policies 

2. With the exception of the public scientific studies, the point of view memos, and the 

FDA notification letters, Defendants need not produce documents from before October 1, 2010. 

3. Plaintiffs shall have until December 18, 2015, to file a Third Amended Complaint for 

the reasons discusses at the case management conference, or if they so choose, to proceed with the 

Second Amended Complaint. 

4. If the parties cannot reach agreement, they shall file a joint letter brief, not to exceed 10 

pages, by January 15, 2016, addressing (1) Plaintiffs’ demand for consumer surveys and other 

market research, and (2) if not mooted by any Third Amended Complaint, Defendants’ demand for 

medical records. 

5. Factual discovery and class certification shall proceed as follows: 

Event Date

Close of factual discovery May 9, 2016

Plaintiffs file opening class brief (and expert report, if any) July 11, 2016

Defendants file opposition to class certification brief (and 

expert report, if any)

September 12, 2016

Plaintiffs file reply to class certification October 27, 2016

Hearing on class certification November 16, 2016 at 

2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: December 11, 2015 ___________________________ 

 The Honorable William H. Orrick 

 United States District Judge 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, the filer hereby attests 

that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all parties. 

Case 3:14-cv-04601-WHO Document 92 Filed 12/11/15 Page 2 of 2