Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-03345/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-03345-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FINISAR CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

NISTICA, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-03345-BLF (JSC)

UNSEALING ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 181

On April 6, 2015, the Court granted in part Finisar’s motion to strike Nistica’s amended 

invalidity contentions without prejudice to allowing Nistica to file a formal motion seeking to 

establish good cause to amend. (Dkt. No. 181 at 15.) The Court filed the April 6 Order under seal 

because various matters referenced therein were filed under seal in this matter. (Id. at 17.) 

However, the Court noted that it was “not persuaded that any of the things discussed in th[e] Order 

are in fact confidential and properly sealable” and required the parties to inform the Court by no 

later than April 10 what information, if any, within the Order must remain sealed. (Id. at 17-18.) 

The Court advised the parties that “[f]ailure to file such a statement will result in unsealing of th[e] 

Order in its entirety.” (Id.) The parties have failed to inform the Court what information needs to 

remain sealed, and the deadline to do so has long since passed. The Court notes that its Order 

contains no details of or references to the content of documents filed under seal. Accordingly, the 

Court orders that its April 6 Order be UNSEALED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 21, 2015

________________________

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:13-cv-03345-BLF Document 199 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 1