Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02687/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02687-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S MEMO IN 

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. C07-2687 SBA 

BRENT P. LORIMER (USB No. A3731) (admitted pro hac vice) 

blorimer@wnlaw.com 

THOMAS R. VUKSINICK (USB No. A3341) (admitted pro hac vice) 

tvuksinick@wnlaw.com 

CHAD E. NYDEGGER (USB No. 9664) (to be admitted pro hac vice) 

cnydegger@wnlaw.com 

WORKMAN NYDEGGER 

1000 Eagle Gate Tower 

60 East South Temple 

Salt Lake City, UT 84111 

Telephone: (801) 533-9800 

Facsimile: (801) 328-1707 

ROBERT H. SLOSS 

FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP 

235 Montgomery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94101 

Telephone: (415) 954-4400 

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 (fax) 

RSloss@fbm.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CARDICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

INTEGRATED VASCULAR 

INTERVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, 

L.C., a Utah limited liability company, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. C07-2687 SBA 

Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING 

THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY 

TO PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM IN 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL 

JURISDICTION 

The parties hereby stipulate, subject to Court approval, that the time for defendant to serve 

and file its reply to plaintiff’s memorandum in opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for 

Lack of Personal Jurisdiction be extended from January 8, 2008 to January 22, 2008. Defendant’s 

Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is scheduled for hearing on February 12, 2008, 

Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 35 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S MEMO IN 

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. C07-2687 SBA 2

more than 14 days after the proposed extension for filing defendant’s reply. Accordingly, the 

extension will not affect the hearing date and will comply with Local Rule 7-3(c) which provides 

that any reply to an opposition memorandum be served and filed not less than 14 days before the 

hearing date. 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

Dated: January 7, 2008 By /s/ Jeffrey M. Olson 

Jeffrey M. Olson 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CARDICA, INC. 

 WORKMAN NYDEGGER 

Dated: January 7, 2008 By: /s/ Thomas R. Vuksinick 

Brent P. Lorimer 

Thomas R. Vuksinick 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: January 10, 2008 

Saundra B. Armstrong 

 United States District Judge 

Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 35 Filed 01/10/08 Page 2 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE 

TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S MEMO IN 

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. C07-2687 SBA 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on January 10, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to the following: 

jolson@sidley.com and stiu@sidley.com; and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States 

Postal Service the document to the following non-CM/ECF participant: 

Paul Howard Meier 

Sidley Austin LLP 

555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 

Los Angeles, CA 90013 

Executed on January 10, 2008, at Salt Lake City, Utah. 

 WORKMAN NYDEGGER 

 By /s/ Thomas R. Vuksinick 

BRENT P. LORIMER 

 THOMAS R. VUKSINICK 

 CHAD E. NYDEGGER 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

C:\DOCUME~1\jhutchis\LOCALS~1\Temp\MetaSave\009 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Reply to Opposition.doc 

Case 4:07-cv-02687-SBA Document 35 Filed 01/10/08 Page 3 of 3