Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05634/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05634-40/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re

TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR

TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST

LITIGATION,

___________________________________/

No. C-07-05634 CRB (DMR)

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO

COMPEL 

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The court will conduct a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendants All Nippon

Airways Co., Ltd. and China Airlines, Ltd. to Provide Discovery [Docket No. 527] (“Motion to

Compel”) on October 27, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. at the U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, |

California 94612. Those persons most familiar with the disputes that are the subject of the Motion

to Compel, as well as those persons with authority to resolve the disputes, must be present for the

hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, those persons, along with all other counsel whose

presence is necessary to conduct a meaningful meet and confer process, shall be prepared to meet

and confer in the courthouse (at a location to be determined by the court) on the discovery disputes

that are the subjects of the Motion to Compel. Counsel shall be prepared to devote the entire day, if

necessary, to resolving the disputes.

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 571 Filed 10/20/11 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

By no later than October 25, 2011, Defendants All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. and China

Airlines, Ltd. shall e-file a submission that specifically identifies each and every “blocking” statute

Defendants are potentially asserting as objections to the discovery requests at issue in the Motion to

Compel, and shall submit copies of all such statutes. For each blocking statute identified,

Defendants shall identify with adequate specificity the types of documents and information

Defendants believe are protected against production due to the individual blocking statute, so that

the parties may be prepared to have a detailed, meaningful discussion about blocking statutes as part

of the meet and confer session.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 20, 2011

 DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 571 Filed 10/20/11 Page 2 of 2