Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01048/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01048-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRADY K. ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. PELAYO,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:13-cv-01048-AWI-SKO (PC)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT

(Doc. 63)

Plaintiff Brady K. Armstrong, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 8, 2013. This action 

for damages is proceeding on Plaintiff’s amended complaint against Defendant Pelayo for 

retaliation, in violation of Plaintiff’s rights under the First Amendment of the United States 

Constitution.

On November 12, 2015, Plaintiff filed another motion seeking an extension of time. The 

motion was dated October 19, 2015, and it is unclear if Plaintiff mailed it before receiving the 

Court’s most recent order filed on October 28, 2015. The Court has addressed Plaintiff’s motion

///

///

///

///

///

Case 1:13-cv-01048-DAD-SKO Document 64 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

for an extension of time in orders filed on October 20, 2015, and on October 28, 2015. Therefore, 

Plaintiff’s present request for relief is moot and it is DENIED on that ground.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

Case 1:13-cv-01048-DAD-SKO Document 64 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 2