Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01314/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01314-90/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:206 Collect Unpaid Wages

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANDRIKA MEDLOCK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TACO BELL CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:07-cv-01314-SAB

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 

APPLICATION FOR ORDER EXTENDING 

10-PAGE LIMIT FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY 

BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTIONS IN 

LIMINE

(ECF No. 599)

The Court has read and considered Plaintiffs’ motion to extend the page limit for 

Plaintiffs’ reply brief. Considering the issues to be addressed and the extent of Plaintiffs’ 

original briefing, the Court finds that ten pages is sufficient for Plaintiffs to reply to Defendants’ 

opposition. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ request for an extension of the reply page limit is HEREBY 

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01314-SAB Document 600 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 1