Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01761/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01761-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1761

MONICA STITT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

MERRILL COHEN, 

Chapter 7 Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:14-cv-00938-PJM)

Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 23, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monica Stitt, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Harold Barnard, Jakarra 

Jenise Jones, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1761 Doc: 33 Filed: 11/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Monica Stitt appeals from the district court’s order 

upholding the bankruptcy court’s determination that her student 

loan debt was not dischargeable in her bankruptcy case. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we deny Stitt’s motions for judicial notice and her motions to 

rescind the orders deferring consideration of her motions for 

judicial notice, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Stitt v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ., No. 8:14-cv00938-PJM (D. Md. filed June 9, 2015; entered June 16, 2015). 

We deny Stitt’s motion for oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-1761 Doc: 33 Filed: 11/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 2