Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00123/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00123-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

This matter was removed to this court on January 26, 2016. (Doc. 1) The next day, the 

Clerk of the Court noticed that Plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Gonzalez, was not admitted to practice in 

this Court and notified him that he was not in compliance with the electronic filing requirement. 

(Doc. 5) The Clerk directed him to correct this issue. Id. He did not do so. Therefore, the Court 

ORDERS:

1. No later than March 11, 2016, Mr. Christopher Gonzalez SHALL show cause in 

writing why sanctions should not be imposed for his acts in practicing in this court without being 

admitted and for failing to comply with the Clerk’s directive that he register for CM/ECF. 

Alternatively, Mr. Gonzalez may seek admission to this court within the same period of time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 1, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CRITTERS OF THE CINEMA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00123 --- JLT

ORDER TO PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL TO SHOW 

CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE 

IMPOSED FOR HIS PRACTICE IN THIS COURT 

WITHOUT SEEKING ADMISSION

Case 1:16-cv-00123-AWI-JLT Document 15 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 1