Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-01474/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-01474-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS RUBEN ELLINGTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-99-1474 MCE CMK P

vs.

DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 / ORDER

On June 27, 2005 plaintiff filed a motion requesting an extension of time to

respond to defendants’ motion for summary judgment until the court has ruled on “Plaintiff’s

Motion of Inability to Access the Court due to Physical Impairment.” The motion to which

plaintiff is referring appears to be his June 13, 2005 objections to the undersigned’s findings and

recommendations. 

By order of the court on April 28, 2005, the parties were directed to file separate

cross-motions for summary judgement on or before July 13, 2005. Oppositions were to be filed

by August 3, 2005. As plaintiff’s response is not due until August 3, 2005, his request for an

extension is premature. 

///

///

Case 2:99-cv-01474-MCE -CMK Document 292 Filed 07/01/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

IT IS ORDERED plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to reply to

defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to renewal at a time closer

to when his response is due. 

DATED: June 30, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:99-cv-01474-MCE -CMK Document 292 Filed 07/01/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:99-cv-01474-MCE -CMK Document 292 Filed 07/01/05 Page 3 of 3