Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-02744/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-02744-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CLEAR-VIEW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN H. RASNICK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-02744-BLF 

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS' 

REPLY

[Re: ECF 183]

On April 24, 2015, Defendants filed a reply in support of their motion to exclude testimony 

from Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Jonathan Neuberger. Defendants’ reply is 19 pages, in violation of 

Civil Local Rule 7-3(c). The Court did not permit a page limit extension for this briefing, nor did 

Defendants seek one. The Court therefore STRIKES Defendants’ reply. 

Defendants may file a reply that is compliant with Rule 7-3(c) no later than Friday, May 1, 

2015. All argument and the signature page must be within the 15 page limitation. Defendants may 

not use excessive footnotes in order to get around the page limit requirement. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2015

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:13-cv-02744-BLF Document 184 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 1