Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01334/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01334-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

DARYL S. LANDY, State Bar No. 136288

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

One Market, Spear Street Tower

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126

Tel: 415.442.1000

Fax: 415.442.1001

Email: dlandy@morganlewis.com

MICHAEL J. PUMA (admitted pro hac vice)

BRANDON J. BRIGHAM (admitted pro hac vice)

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

1701 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Tel: 215.963.5000

Fax: 215.963.5001

Email: mpuma@morganlewis.com

bbrigham@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant

THE HERSHEY COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GREGORY P. BARNES, et al.

Plaintiffs,

vs.

THE HERSHEY COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:12-cv-01334-CRB

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS 

Case 3:12-cv-01334-CRB Document 267 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

This Matter came before the Court on the Administrative Motion of Plaintiffs’ to File 

Under Seal Documents, ECF 260. Having considered the papers submitted and the papers on file 

in this case, and for the compelling reasons set forth in the Declaration of Brandon J. Brigham in 

Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents, ECF 265, Plaintiffs’ 

Motion is hereby GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, and the Court orders the following 

documents sealed:

1. The redacted portions of the Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment on Defendant’s Affirmative Defense of Waiver (“Plaintiffs’ Reply”), ECF 265-

3; 

2. The redacted portions of Exhibits C & G to the Brian J. Malloy in Support in Support of 

Plaintiffs’ Reply (“Malloy Declaration”), ECF 265-1, ECF 265-2.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall file in the public record Exhibits A, 

H, I & J to the Malloy Declaration within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order or those 

documents will not be considered by the Court when ruling on when ruling on either Defendant 

The Hershey Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF 229, or Plaintiffs’ Motion 

for Partial Summary Judgment regarding Defendant’s Affirmative Defense of Waiver, ECF 236. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall file in the public record a redacted 

version of Exhibit B to the Malloy Declaration or a supplemental declaration setting forth the 

compelling reasons for maintaining the confidentiality of that document within ten (10) days of 

the entry of this Order or that document will not be considered by the Court when ruling on when 

ruling on either Defendant The Hershey Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF 

229, or Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment regarding Defendant’s Affirmative 

Defense of Waiver, ECF 236. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 8th day of May, 2015.

 

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:12-cv-01334-CRB Document 267 Filed 05/08/15 Page 2 of 2