Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00287/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00287-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, SR.,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

SMITH, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:13-cv-00287-LJO-GSA-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION 

BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR 

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON 

WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED

(Doc. 1.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN THIRTY 

DAYS

Curtis Lee Henderson, Sr. (“Plaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint 

commencing this action on February 27, 2013. (Doc. 1.) 

On May 8, 2014, the Court dismissed Plaintiff=s Complaint for failure to state a claim, 

with leave to file an Amended Complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A; 28 U.S.C. '

1915(e). To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court=s order. 

As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be 

granted. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A 

and 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e), this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff=s failure 

Case 1:13-cv-00287-LJO-SAB Document 23 Filed 06/20/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section 1983, and that this dismissal be 

subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658 

F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(l). Within thirty 

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate 

Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2014 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00287-LJO-SAB Document 23 Filed 06/20/14 Page 2 of 2