Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_16-cv-00700/USCOURTS-ared-4_16-cv-00700-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:521 Communications Act

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

WESTERN DIVISION 

SHARRY ROBERTS 

v. No. 4:16-cv-700-DPM 

PLAINTIFF 

PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC DEFENDANT 

ORDER 

Courts have divided about whether one may orally revoke consent 

under the TCP A. But, in an unpublished opinion, the Eighth Circuit has 

indicated that it's possible, and other circuits have so held. Brenner v . 

American Education Services, 575 Fed. App'x 703, 703 (8th Cir. 2014), citing 

Osorio v. State Farm Bank, F.S.B., 746 F.3d 1242, 1255-56 (11th Cir. 2014) and 

Gager v. Dell Financial Services, LLC, 727 F.3d 265, 270-72 (3d Cir. 2013). 

Pennymac's motion to dismiss, NQ 9, is therefore denied. 

So Ordered. 

D .P. Marshall Jr. 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:16-cv-00700-DPM Document 17 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 1