Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00437/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00437-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their Joint

Case Management Statement filed in connection with a case management conference. 

Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case

management conference has not been scheduled.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS MORGAN TILLEY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, COMMISSIONER,

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. C 15-0437 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

INFORM COURT WHETHER HE

CONSENTS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FOR ALL PURPOSES

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to

reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final

judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b).

On February 23, 2015, defendant consented to have a magistrate judge conduct all

further proceedings in the instant action. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to

advise the Court, no later than March 20, 2015, as to whether he consents to have a

magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant action.1

 For plaintiff’s

convenience, a consent form is attached hereto; forms are also available at

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 24, 2015 MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-00437-EDL Document 13 Filed 02/24/15 Page 1 of 1