Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01717/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01717-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1680

ROSS A. FIORANI, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; ROBERT BERGER; KAREN COMPHER; 

FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER FEIGLESON, 

official capacity; SHENANDOAH INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, INC.; 

THEMA T. SCOTT,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-1717

ROSS A. FIORANI, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; ROBERT BERGER; KAREN COMPHER; 

FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER FEIGLESON, 

official capacity; SHENANDOAH INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, INC.; 

THEMA T. SCOTT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:15-cv-00667-LO-JFA)

Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 19, 2015

Appeal: 15-1717 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ross A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas R. Waskom, 

HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Ann Gouldin 

Killalea, Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1717 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Ross A. Fiorani, Jr., seeks 

to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil 

complaint and denying his challenge to the removal of the action 

from state court.* We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Fiorani v. Navy Fed. Credit Union, No. 

1:15-cv-00667-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. June 19, 2015). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * In Appeal No. 15-1680, Fiorani does not identify the order 

he seeks to appeal. In fact, we found no entry of any order 

prior to the filing of his notice of appeal. In his notice of 

appeal, Fiorani generally objected to the removal of his action 

to federal district court, a claim addressed in the district 

court’s final order, the subject of Appeal No. 15-1717. 

Appeal: 15-1717 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/19/2015 Pg: 3 of 3