Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00556/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00556-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION

Russell Ainsworth, Illinois Bar No. 6280777

(E-Mail: russell@loevy.com)

Rachel Steinback, Illinois Bar No. 6300949

(E-Mail: rachel@loevy.com)

LOEVY & LOEVY

312 North May Street, Suite 100 

Chicago, Illinois 60607

Tel.: (312) 243-5900 

Fax: (312) 243-5902 

In Association With:

Kevin G. Little, SBN 149818

(E-Mail: kevin@kevinglittle.com)

Law Office of Kevin G. Little

Post Office Box 8656

Fresno, California 93747

Tel.: (559) 342-5800

Fax: (559) 420-0839 

Attorneys for Plaintiff GEORGE SOULIOTES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

GEORGE SOULIOTES,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF MODESTO; MODESTO 

POLICE DEP’T; MODESTO FIRE 

DEP’T; SGT. MIKE HARDEN; DET. 

ROGER LEE; DET. DICK RIDENOUR; 

DET. JOHN BUEHLER; DET. DODGE 

HENDEE; OFFICER JOE PIMENTEL; 

INVESTIGATOR BOB EVERS; 

INVESTIGATOR TOM REUSCHER; 

and DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-CV-00556-LJO-SKO

ORDER ON EX PARTE 

APPLICATION FOR ONE DAY 

CONTINUANCE OF MOTION TO 

DISMISS OPPOSITION FILING 

DEADLINE

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s ex parte application for a one-day 

continuance of the motion to dismiss opposition deadline, previously set for April 18, 2016.

Case 1:15-cv-00556-LJO-SKO Document 56 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court grants this application and orders that Plaintiff’s 

Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint shall 

be deemed timely filed on April 19, 2016, and that Plaintiff shall be granted six additional pages 

for his Opposition. The Court also orders that Defendants shall be granted a reciprocal six 

additional pages for their Reply, and that the motion hearing date shall be continued to May 16, 

2016, with Defendants’ Reply due on May 9, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 22, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00556-LJO-SKO Document 56 Filed 04/22/16 Page 2 of 2