Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-3_05-cv-00933/USCOURTS-almd-3_05-cv-00933-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WEST CRIM, #201933, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-0933-T

) WO

ARNOLD HOLT, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

ORDER

On October 12, 2005 (Doc. 4), the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this

case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file

in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is 

ORDERED that the Recommendation is adopted and that:

1. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief filed by West Crim on

September 28, 2005, is DENIED.

2. This cause of action is DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28

Case 3:05-cv-00933-MHT-DRB Document 7 Filed 11/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

The court notes that any §2254 petition filed by the petitioner is likewise subject

to the one-year period of limitation contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (d)(1). Moreover, the

court finds that there are no circumstances present in this case which “would entitle

[Crim] in the interest of justice to transfer [pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631] or stay. .

.because the limitations period had already expired before he filed” the instant habeas

action. Guenther v. Holt, 173 F.3d 1328, 1330-1331 (11th Cir. 1999).

U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) as the petitioner has failed to obtain the requisite order

from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider

a successive habeas application.1

 

Done this the 18th day of November, 2005.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-00933-MHT-DRB Document 7 Filed 11/18/05 Page 2 of 2