Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-05241/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-05241-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAY LEE VAUGHN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

D. ADAMS, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:01-cv-05241-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 69)

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 29, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

be GRANTED as to all of Petitioner's convictions. These Findings

and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice

that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from

the date of service of that order. On September 27, 2006,

Respondent filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 

On October 10, 2006, Petitioner filed a reply to Respondent's

objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

Case 1:01-cv-05241-OWW -DLB Document 73 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Respondent's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Respondent's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 29, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED as to

all of Petitioner's convictions; and,

3. The State inform the Court whether it will retry

Petitioner on the charges within ninety (90) days from the date of

service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:01-cv-05241-OWW -DLB Document 73 Filed 02/13/07 Page 2 of 2