Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00457/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00457-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASETEK DANMARK A/S,

Plaintiff,

v.

CMI USA, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-00457-JST 

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ 

OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED FORM 

OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Re: ECF No. 313

The Court has received Defendant CMI USA, Inc.’s Objections to Asetek Danmark A/S’s 

Proposed Form of Permanent Injunction. ECF No. 313. 

Plaintiff Asetek Danmark A/S (“Asetek”) filed a motion for entry of a permanent 

injunction, which also included a suggested form of the injunction. See ECF No. 266. CMI’s

opposition addressed the merits of the motion but did not discuss objections to the form of 

Asetek’s proposed injunction. See ECF No. 287. At the hearing, CMI asked the Court for an

opportunity to provide objections as to the form. ECF No. 316, Tr. 39:1-9. After noting that CMI 

could have addressed this issue in its briefing, the Court instructed CMI to submit a request to file 

an objection that included information as to the suggested form of the request, the proposed 

timeline, and the number of pages required. Id. 39:10-24. Rather than file a request to object,

CMI instead filed its objections. ECF No. 313. 

The Court will consider CMI’s objections. The Court, however, admonishes the parties 

not to violate future Court orders. Asetek is ordered to file its response to CMI’s objections, if 

any, by August 25, 2015. No reply by CMI will be permitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 18, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-00457-JST Document 317 Filed 08/18/15 Page 1 of 1