Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02424/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02424-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Harry Byrd, III, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

People of Color Network, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV09-2424-PHX-DGC 

ORDER

 Plaintiff filed this matter on November 19, 2009. On December 16, 2009, the Court

denied Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #7). After the Court granted

Plaintiff’s motion to extend the time for him to pay the filing fee, Plaintiff filed a motion for

reconsideration of the Court’s December 16, 2009 order (Dkt. #10). On February 23, 2010

Plaintiff was directed to file an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #12).

Plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with the order could result in the dismissal of this

action. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s February 23, 2010 order and has not

submitted an amended motion, nor has Plaintiff paid the required filing fee or demonstrated

that he qualifies for in forma pauperis status. 

United States Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan has issued a report and

recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this action be dismissed. Dkt. #13. No

objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985);

United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept

Case 2:09-cv-02424-DGC Document 14 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

the R&R and dismiss this action.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The R&R (Dkt. #13) is accepted.

2. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal

are denied

3. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.

DATED this 4th day of May, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02424-DGC Document 14 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 2