Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00754/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00754-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & ORDER 

TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO

MICHAEL T. JONES (SBN 290660)

mjones@goodwinprocter.com

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

135 Commonwealth Drive

Menlo Park, California 94025-1105

Tel.: 650.752.3100

Fax.: 650.853.1038

Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Claimant:

ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA (SBN 234756)

rajiv.dharnidharka@dlapiper.com

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

555 Mission Street, Suite 2400

San Francisco, CA 94105

Tel.: 415.836.2500

Fax.: 415.836.2501

Attorneys for Plaintiff/ CounterclaimDefendants: WHTIECRYPTION CORPORATION AND 

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES, CORPORATION

[ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED IN SIGNATURE 

BLOCK]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WHITECRYPTION CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES

Date: N/A

Time: N/A

Courtroom: 02, 17th Floor

Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick

450 Golden Gate Avenue

ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., San Francisco, CA

Counter-Claimant,

v.

WHITECRYPTION CORPORATION; and 

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 

CORPORATION

Counter-Defendants.

Case 3:15-cv-00754-WHO Document 103 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 –

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO

Plaintiff and cross-defendants whiteCryption Corporation (“whiteCryption”) and Intertrust 

Technologies Corporation (“Intertrust”) and defendant and counterclaimant Arxan Technologies, 

Inc. (“Arxan”) stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On February 18, 2015, whiteCryption initiated the above-captioned action against 

Arxan.

2. Arxan answered and counterclaimed against whiteCryption and Intertrust on April 

10, 2015.

3. Between May and June 2015, the parties engaged in motion practice regarding the 

counterclaims, and on June 18, 2015, the Court granted Intertrust’s motion to dismiss with leave to 

amend.

4. On June 17, 2015, the Court issued a Civil Pretrial Order setting the deadlines in 

this action. ECF No. 35. The Court later ordered the parties to a settlement conference with a 

magistrate judge and modified the case schedule to accommodate a first phase of document 

discovery prior to the settlement conference. See ECF. Nos. 42-45. 

5. On January 5, 2016, the parties’ participated in a settlement conference with a 

magistrate judge, which did not result in settlement. ECF No. 46. 

6. On February 17, 2016, whiteCryption filed its first amended complaint and Arxan 

filed its first amended counterclaims. ECF Nos. 51-52.

7. On March 22, 2016, whiteCryption and Intertrust moved to dismiss the first 

amended counterclaims (ECF No. 66), and on June 15, 2016 the Court granted in part and denied 

in part the motion without leave to amend (ECF No. 89).

8. The parties have engaged in extensive discovery, collectively producing hundreds 

of thousands of documents and approximately 20 depositions will be taken, two of which are 

scheduled to take place after the close of fact discovery.1 Based on the document productions and 

scheduling issues, the first deposition did not occur until June 16, 2016.

 

1 whiteCryption will take the deposition of Google at a mutually agreeable date after Google 

produces the documents the Court ordered it to produce. See Dkt. No. 101. whiteCryption will 

take the deposition of a former Arxan employee on July 21, 2016 by agreement of the parties. The 

deposition was planned for July 8, but the deponent has a family emergency, which necessitated a 

rescheduling with no available alternative before the July 15, 2016 fact discovery deadline. 

Case 3:15-cv-00754-WHO Document 103 Filed 07/06/16 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 –

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO

9. Due to the large volume of documents produced in this case and the number and 

the schedule of depositions, the parties both require additional time to prepare and produce 

meaningful expert reports without seeking leave for supplementing them. Moving the expert 

disclosure deadline triggers a need to reschedule the deadlines that follow expert disclosures. 

Further, all parties anticipate filing motions for summary judgment or summary adjudication, 

which the parties believe is good cause to extend the briefing and hearing schedule for such 

motions.

10. The parties previously requested one extension of the deadlines in the Civil Pretrial 

Order on December 18, 2015, which was granted on December 21, 2015. ECF No. 45

11. The parties realize that changing a case schedule is highly dependent upon the 

Court’s schedule, including the Court’s availability to hear dispositive motions, conduct pretrial 

conferences, and conduct trials. The parties welcome a telephonic case management conference to 

discuss alternatives to the schedule they are proposing.

Therefore, the parties stipulate and agree, subject to the Court’s approval, that deadlines for 

expert discovery and the deadlines that follow it be set as follows:

Current Deadline Proposed Deadline

Expert disclosure July 29, 2016 August 29, 2016

Expert rebuttal August 22, 2016 September 22, 2016

Expert discovery cutoff September 12, 2016 October 12, 2016

Dispositive motion filing deadline none October 19, 2016

Oppositions to dispositive motions 

due

none November 10, 2016

Replies in support of dispositive 

motions due 

none November 23, 2016

Dispositive motions heard by November 9, 2016 December 7, 2016

Pretrial Conference January 23, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. February 20, 2017 at 

2:00 p.m.

Trial (jury) February 27, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. March 27, 2017 at 8:30 

a.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: July 5, 2016 By: /s/Michael T. Jones

MICHAEL T. JONES (SBN 290660)

mjones@goodwinprocter.com

NICOLE L. CHESSARI (SBN 259970)

nchessari@goodwinprocter.com

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Case 3:15-cv-00754-WHO Document 103 Filed 07/06/16 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 4 –

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO

135 Commonwealth Drive

Menlo Park, California 94025-1105

Tel.: 650.752.3100

Fax.: 650.853.1038

FORREST A. HAINLINE III (SBN 64166)

fhainline@goodwinprocter.com

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Tel.: 415.733.6000

Fax.: 415.677.9041

HONG-AN VU (SBN 266268)

hvu@goodwinprocter.com

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

601 S. Figueroa Street, 41st Floor

Los Angeles, California 90017

Tel.: 213.426.2500

Fax.: 213.623.1673

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Claimant:

ARXAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: July 5, 2016 By: /s/ Rajiv Dharnidharka

RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA (SBN 234756)

rajiv.dharnidharka@dlapiper.com

DEBORAH E. MCCRIMMON (SBN 229769)

deborah.mccrimmon@dlapiper.com

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

555 Mission Street, Suite 2400

San Francisco, California 94105-2933

Tel.: 415.836.2500

Fax: 415.836.2501

TODD M. NOONAN (SBN 172962)

todd.noonan@dlapiper.com

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2400

Sacramento, CA 95814-4428

Tel.: 916.930.3200

Fax: 916.930.3201

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants:

WHTIECRYPTION CORPORATION AND INTERTRUST 

TECHNOLOGIES, CORPORATION

Case 3:15-cv-00754-WHO Document 103 Filed 07/06/16 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 5 –

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00754-WHO

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED except as modified below:

Pre-trial conference: February 27, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.

Trial: April 3, 2017 at 8:30 a.m.

Dated: July 6, 2016

HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-00754-WHO Document 103 Filed 07/06/16 Page 5 of 5