Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-193/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SEAL DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(d); Master File No. CV-07-5944-SC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

____________________________________

This Document Relates to: 

DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS ACTIONS 

Master File No. CV- 07-5944-SC

MDL No. 1917 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DIRECT 

PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL 

DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO CIVIL 

LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(d) 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2257 Filed 12/11/13 Page 1 of 2
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SEAL DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5(d); Master File No. CV-07-5944-SC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

On November 11, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an Administrative Motion to Seal Documents 

Pursuant To Civil Local Rules 7-11 And 79-5(d) to file the following document under seal: 

• Gray highlighted Portions of the Reply Brief in Support of Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs’ 

Motion for Class Certification that contain quotations or information from documents 

that Defendants have designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential”; 

• Exhibits 1, 5, 6, and 7 to the Declaration of Geoffrey C. Rushing in Support Reply Brief 

in Support of Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification that contain 

quotations or information from documents that Defendants have designated 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential”; and 

• The Reply Expert Report of Jeffrey J. Leitzinger, Ph.D. 

Having read and considered the papers filed and arguments made by counsel, and good 

cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion To Seal 

Documents Pursuant To Civil Local Rules 7-11 And 79-5(d) is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: . 

Hon. Samuel Conti 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

December 11, 2013

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2257 Filed 12/11/13 Page 2 of 2