Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00044/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00044-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORENZO McCRAY, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

WCC/GEO, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00044-REC-SMS-P 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDING AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 13)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH

PREJUDICE AND DIRECTING CLERK

TO ENTER JUDGMENT FOR

DEFENDANTS 

Plaintiff Lorenzo McCray (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se

in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On September 21, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fifteen (15)

days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:05-cv-00044-REC -SMS Document 14 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 21,

2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for

plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s order of August 3, 2005,

and for failure to state any claims upon which relief may be

granted under Bivens.

3. Judgment for defendants to be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 27, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00044-REC -SMS Document 14 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 2