Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00700/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00700-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

FREDERICK BROWN, SBN 65316 

JAYESH HINES-SHAH, SBN 214256 

One Montgomery Street 

Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 393-8200 

Facsimile: (415) 986-5309

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ARVESTA CORPORATION

[Additional counsel listed on signature page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ARVESTA CORPORATION, a California 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v. 

BAYER AG, a German corporation; BAYER 

CORPORATION, an Indiana corporation;

BAYER CROPSCIENCE, a Delaware limited

partnership; BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG, a 

German corporation; BAYER INC., a Canadian 

corporation, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C 04-0700 SC (BZ) 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Arvesta Corporation and defendants 

Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer CropScience, Bayer CropScience AG, and Bayer Inc., and 

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that, as part of the consideration 

of the settlement reached between the above-referenced parties: 

1. Plaintiff Arvesta Corporation shall dismiss its complaint in the above action in its entirety, 

with prejudice; and, 

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees in connection with this action. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Case No. C 04-0700 SC (BZ)

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

Case 3:04-cv-00700-SC Document 100 Filed 05/10/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: April 28, 2005 ______ /s/ Jayesh Hines-Shah_____________

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

JAYESH HINES-SHAH, SBN 214256 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: April , 2005 __________________________________________ 

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 

BRUCE R. GENDERSON pro hac vice

R. HACKNEY WIEGMANN pro hac vice

JOHN E. SCHMIDTLEIN – SBN 163520 pro hac vice

ANDREW W. RUDGE pro hac vice

725 Twelfth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

Telephone: (202) 434-5000

Facsimile: (202) 434-5029

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

STUART L. GASNER – SBN 164675 

CHRISTA M. ANDERSON – SBN 184325 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188

Attorneys for Defendants 

BAYER AG; BAYER CORPORATION; BAYER

CROPSCIENCE; BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG; 

BAYER INC. 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Case No. C 04-0700 SC (BZ)

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

Case 3:04-cv-00700-SC Document 100 Filed 05/10/05 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:04-cv-00700-SC Document 100 Filed 05/10/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ARVESTA CORPORATION, a California 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v. 

BAYER AG, a German corporation; BAYER 

CORPORATION, an Indiana corporation;

BAYER CROPSCIENCE, a Delaware limited

partnership; BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG, a 

German corporation; BAYER INC., a Canadian 

corporation, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C 04-0700 SC (BZ) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the above stipulation and the full settlement of this case, it is hereby ORDERED 

that:

1. Plaintiff Arvesta Corporation’s Complaint in the above action shall be DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees in connection with this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ______________ __________________________________________

 Honorable Samuel Conti

40210286_1.DOC

[PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C 04-0700 SC (BZ)

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

May 10, 2005 /s/ Samuel Conti

Case 3:04-cv-00700-SC Document 100 Filed 05/10/05 Page 4 of 4