Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 

Defendants 

Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC 

Case No. 15-cv-0262-EMC 

ORDER RE SERVICE ON COUNSEL 

OF RELATED CASES 

On April 21, 2016, Plaintiffs in O’Connor v. Uber Technologies and Yucesoy v. Uber 

Technologies moved for preliminary approval of a class settlement. The parties are to serve a 

complete set of the publicly-filed moving papers and a copy of this order to all counsel of record 

in the cases listed on pages 6-8 of the “Class Action Settlement and Release,” including: 

 Price v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. BC554512 

 Del Rio v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-3667-EMC 

 Berger v. Uber Technololgies, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-41-MEJ 

 In re Uber FCRA Litigation, Case No. 3:14-cv-5200-EMC 

 Ghazi v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. CGC-15-545532 

 Richardson v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. RG15775562 

 Zine v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. BC591351 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 214 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

 Narsi v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. BC599027 

 Tabola v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. CGC-16-550992 

 Barajas v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. CGC-16-550198 

 Aquino v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. BC608873 

 Adzhemyan v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. BC608874 

 Gollnick v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. CGC-15-547878 

 Mokeddas v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No. RG16807483 

 Berwick v. Uber Technologies Inc., Case No. CGC-15-546378 

The parties should also serve a complete set of the moving papers to the affected state and federal 

agencies (i.e., the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency and the National Labor 

Relations Board). 

The served parties shall file any comments on the proposed settlement by Friday, May 13, 

2016 at 6:00 p.m. The O’Connor and Yucesoy parties shall file any response to those comments 

by Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. Service shall be effected within two days of the order, 

and a proof of service filed by Friday, April 29, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 27, 2016 

______________________________________ 

EDWARD M. CHEN 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 214 Filed 04/27/16 Page 2 of 2