Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01380/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01380-55/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff George H. Robinson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the complaint against 

Defendants David, Miranda, Melo, Garcia, Mendoza, Martinez and Masiel for use of excessive force 

in violation of the Eighth Amendment; against Defendants Adams and Ruiz for failure to protect in 

violation of the Eighth Amendment; and against Defendants Martinez, David, Miranda and Garcia for 

assault and battery in violation of state law. 

On May 17, 2013, the Court issued an order related to its in camera review of documents 

submitted by Defendant Jesse Martinez. At that time, the Court informed the parties of its intended 

ruling to order that the documents regarding Defendant Martinez’s reprimand for unnecessary use of 

force in 2008 be produced with all personal information, other than employee names and/or inmate 

names, redacted. The Court’s intended ruling was issued to allow Defendants sufficient time to 

request a protective order and to notify any inmates that their information would be provided to 

GEORGE H. ROBINSON,

 Plaintiff,

v.

D. G. ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:08-cv-001380-AWI-BAM PC

ORDER RE: IN CAMERA REVIEW

TEN DAY DEADLINE

Case 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-BAM Document 196 Filed 11/06/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff pursuant to this Court’s order. The Court granted Defendants thirty-days in which to apply 

for further protective order relating to these documents. (ECF No. 175.) 

More than thirty days have passed and Defendants have not applied for a further protective 

order. Accordingly, Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED to submit a status report within TEN (10) 

days regarding the production of documents encompassed by the Court’s intended ruling, including 

whether the relevant documents have been produced or whether a further order of this Court is 

required. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 6, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-BAM Document 196 Filed 11/06/13 Page 2 of 2