Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02473/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02473-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KELLY H. ARMSTRONG (SBN 213036)

THE ARMSTRONG LAW FIRM

807 Montgomery Street

San Francisco, Ca 94133

Telephone; (415) 928-1293

Facsimile: (415) 928-1294

E-mail: kellyalaw@aol.com

STEVEN J. BRADY, ESQ. (State Bar No. 116651)

BRADY LAW GROUP

1015 Irwin Street, Suite A

San Rafael, CA 94901

Telephone: (415) 459-7300

Facsimile: (415) 459-7303

E-mail: bradydesk@aol.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LAWRENCE ROMANECK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE ROMANECK, an individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DEUTSCHE ASSET MANAGEMENT, a

Delaware corporation, DEUTSCHE BANK

AG, a New York corporation, DEUTSCHE

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT

AMERICAS, INC., a corporation, SCUDDER

DISTRIBUTORS, INC., a corporation,

INDIVIDUAL DOES 1-50 and CORPORATE

DOES 51-100, inclusive

 Defendants.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 05 02473 TEH

UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

STIPULATION TO FILE THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 3:05-cv-02473-TEH Document 45 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 3
 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Counsel for Plaintiff Lawrence Romaneck and Defendants Deutsche Asset Management

et al hereby agree to stipulate to the filing of a Third Amended Complaint, and further stipulate

that the Answer filed by Defendants on October 17, 2005, shall be treated as the Answer to

Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint with the exception as to Defendant Winnick, who has been

dismissed with prejudice from this litigation.

Reviewed and accepted.

Dated: April 6, 2006 THE ARMSTRONG LAW FIRM

By__/s/ Kelly Armstrong___________

 KELLY ARMSTRONG

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 LAWRENCE ROMANECK

Dated: April 6, 2006 THE BRADY LAW GROUP

By__/s/ Stephen J. Brady___________

 STEPHEN J. BRADY

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 LAWRENCE ROMANECK

Reviewed and accepted.

Dated: March 27, 2006 MORGAN, LEWIS, BOCKIUS

By__/s/ Brian Johnsrud____________

 BRIAN JOHNSRUD

 Attorneys for Defendants

 DEUTSCHE ASSET MANAGEMENT et al

Case 3:05-cv-02473-TEH Document 45 Filed 04/10/06 Page 2 of 3
 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

Plaintiff Lawrence Romaneck may file a Third Amended Complaint pursuant to the parties’

stipulation and the Answer filed by Defendants on October 17, 2005, shall be treated as the

Answer to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint with the exception as to Defendant Winnick,

who has been dismissed by Plaintiff with prejudice from this litigation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________ ______ 

HONORABLE THELTON E. HENDERSON

04/06/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:05-cv-02473-TEH Document 45 Filed 04/10/06 Page 3 of 3