Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01615/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01615-35/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN VLASICH, 1:05-cv-01615-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER REPLACING DEFENDANTS'

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

vs. OF JANUARY 29, 2010 WITH DEFENDANTS' 

RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

DR. TIMOTHY FISHBACK, et al., JUDGMENT OF APRIL 30, 2010

 (Docs. 132, 141.)

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION,

OR STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION, TO THE

Defendants. APRIL 30, 2010 MOTION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

_____________________________/

Steven Vlasich (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on December 20, 2005. 

This action now proceeds on plaintiff’s original complaint, against defendants Juarez, Villa, and

Fishback. On January 29, 2010, Defendants Juarez and Villa ("Defendants") filed a motion for

summary judgment. (Doc. 132.) On April 29, 2010, the Clerk notified Defendants of a discrepancy

in the filing of the motion and directed Defendants to re-submit the motion. (Doc. 139.) On April

30, 2010, Defendants re-submitted the motion. (Doc. 141.) Therefore, the later-filed motion for

summary judgment now replaces replace the prior motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff is now

excused from filing a response to the January 29, 2010 motion for summary judgment. However,

1

Case 1:05-cv-01615-LJO -GSA Document 144 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff must file an opposition, or statement of non-opposition, to the April 30, 2010 motion for

summary judgment within thirty days, pursuant to this order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment filed on January 29, 2010, is REPLACED

WITH Defendants' motion for summary judgment filed on April 30, 2010;

2. Plaintiff is excused from filing a response to Defendants' January 29, 2010 motion for

summary judgment;

3. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition, or statement of non-opposition, to

Defendants' April 30, 2010 motion for summary judgment within thirty days of the

date of service of this order; and

4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to resolve Defendants' motion for summary judgment, filed

January 29, 2010, on the docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 24, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:05-cv-01615-LJO -GSA Document 144 Filed 05/24/10 Page 2 of 2