Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00508/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00508-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRYL GRANT,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAL FIRE, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-0508 KJN P

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed March 18, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 

pauperis affidavit and a certified prison trust account statement within thirty days and was 

cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and 

has not submitted the required documents.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 

the party is fully effective.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign 

a district judge to this case; and

////

Case 2:15-cv-00508-MCE-KJN Document 5 Filed 05/07/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 7, 2015

/gran0508.fifp

Case 2:15-cv-00508-MCE-KJN Document 5 Filed 05/07/15 Page 2 of 2