Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01053/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01053-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Lewis v. City of Fairfield, et al. CASE NO. 2:16-CV-01053-JAM-AC

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 

Parry A. Black, State Bar No. 291472 

BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL 

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

Email: gfox@bfesf.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF FAIRFIELD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KEITH LEWIS 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, ET AL. 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:16-cv-01053-JAM-AC 

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER 

Honorable John A. Mendez 

Plaintiff KEITH LEWIS and Defendant CITY OF FAIRFIELD, by and through their counsel of 

record, hereby represent to the Court as follows: 

On June 25, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint in the above captioned action. 

The CITY OF FAIRFIELD was served on July 13, 2016. The parties filed a stipulation granting 

a 28-day extension on August 4, 2016. The current deadline for the CITY OF FAIRFIELD to respond to 

the complaint is August 31, 2016. 

The parties are in the processing of meeting and conferring prior to Defendant CITY OF 

FAIRFIELD filing a motion to dismiss and an additional 21-day extension of time to respond to the 

complaint will facilitate a productive meet and confer process. 

The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the time within which the Defendant CITY OF 

FAIRFIELD may file and serve a response to the Amended Complaint shall be extended by twenty one 

Case 2:16-cv-01053-JAM-AC Document 11 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Lewis v. City of Fairfield, et al. CASE NO. 2:16-CV-01053-JAM-AC

(21) days, from the current response date, August 31, 2016 to September 21, 2016, pursuant to Eastern 

District of California Local Rule 144 (a). 

One previous extensions have been sought in this action. 

It is so stipulated and agreed. 

Dated: August 30, 2016 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & 

WENZEL 

By: /s/ Gregory M. Fox 

 Gregory M. Fox 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF FAIRFIELD 

Dated: August 30, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF DENNIS CUNNINGHAM 

 By: /s/ Dennis Cunningham (as authorized on 8/26/16)

 Dennis Cunningham 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

KEITH LEWIS 

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION 

 I, Gregory M. Fox, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the 

foregoing documents. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 131(e), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing 

of these documents has been obtained from each of its Signatories. 

Dated: August 30, 2016 /s/ Gregory M. Fox 

 Gregory M. Fox 

SO ORDERED 

Dated: 8/30/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez________ 

 Honorable John A. Mendez 

Case 2:16-cv-01053-JAM-AC Document 11 Filed 08/31/16 Page 2 of 2