Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01600/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01600-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Thomas Clinton

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1600 LKK CMK 

vs.

California Department of 

Corrections, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915. However, the certificate portion of the request, which must be completed by plaintiff’s

institution, had not been filled out. Additionally, plaintiff did not file a certified statement of his

prison trust account for the six month period immediately proceeding the filing of the complaint. 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). 

By order filed August 30, 2005, the court gave plaintiff an opportunity to submit a

corrected in forma pauperis form and a certified copy of this prison trust statement in support

 of his application. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the court’s August 30, 2005

order would result in a recommendation that his complaint be dismissed without prejudice. To

Case 2:05-cv-01600-DAD-DMC Document 10 Filed 10/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

date, plaintiff has failed to submit either a corrected in forma pauperis form or a certified copy of

his prison trust statement. 

Based on the foregoing, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT this action be dismissed

without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s August 30, 2005 order and file

a corrected in forma pauperis form and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 12, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01600-DAD-DMC Document 10 Filed 10/13/05 Page 2 of 2