Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01516/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01516-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 1

Case No. 5:15-cv-01516

 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT L A W

S A N FRANCISCO

Daniel S. Mount, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 77517)

David S. Lavine, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 166744)

MOUNT, SPELMAN & FINGERMAN, P.C.

RiverPark Tower, Suite 1650

333 West San Carlos Street

San Jose CA 95110-2740

Phone: (408) 279-7000

Fax: (408) 998-1473

Email: dmount@mount.com; dlavine@mount.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

SILICONINDIA, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SILICONINDIA, INC.,

Plaintiff

 v.

CIO STORY, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:15-cv-01516

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; 

PROPOSED ORDER

WHEREAS, on August 31, 2015, the parties entered into a settlement agreement to 

resolve disputes in the above-referenced case, a component of which was a stipulation to the 

Court for an Order of Permanent Injunction binding defendant;

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2015, plaintiff filed notice with the Court of the parties 

having reached a conditional settlement;

WHEREAS, on September 28, 2015, the Court issued an order granting leave for plaintiff to 

file a first amended complaint, which plaintiff subsequently filed;

WHEREAS, on September 29, 2015, the Court granted the parties’ amended stipulation for an 

Order of Permanent Injunction binding defendant;

WHEREAS, defendant has since complied with the conditions provided by the settlement 

agreement for plaintiff to seek dismissal of the above-referenced action;

Case 5:15-cv-01516-NC Document 77 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 2

Case No. 5:15-cv-01516

 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT L A W

S A N FRANCISCO

THEREFORE, plaintiff respectfully requests that the above-captioned action should be 

dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), with each party bearing its own 

attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs except as provided by the parties’ settlement agreement. 

Plaintiff further respectfully requests that, pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, the 

Court retain jurisdiction to hear any disputes regarding the interpretation and enforcement of the 

parties’ settlement agreement, and regarding the interpretation and enforcement of the parties’ 

Stipulation to and the Court’s Order of Permanent Injunction. 

Dated: January 7, 2016 MOUNT, SPLEMAN & FINGERMAN, P.C.

By: /s/ David Lavine __ 

 David Lavine

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 SILICONINDIA, INC.

Case 5:15-cv-01516-NC Document 77 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 3

Case No. 5:15-cv-01516

 

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP

ATTORNEYS AT L A W

S A N FRANCISCO

[PROPOSED] ORDER

In accordance with the foregoing request, the Court hereby ORDERS:

(i) The action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2);

(ii) Except as set forth in any agreement between them, each party shall bear its own 

attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs; and

(iii) The Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear any disputes regarding the interpretation 

and enforcement of the parties’ settlement agreement, and regarding the interpretation and 

enforcement of the parties’ Stipulation to and the Court’s Order of Permanent Injunction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: , 2016

Hon. Nathaniel M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:15-cv-01516-NC Document 77 Filed 01/07/16 Page 3 of 3