Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00722/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00722-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANDOR TORRES THIESSEN,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM KNIPP, et al.,

Respondents.

No. 2:13-cv-0722 LKK KJN P

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 18, 2013, respondents filed a motion to 

dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: 

“Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition 

may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within 

twenty-one days, why his failure to oppose respondents’ December 18, 2013 motion to dismiss 

should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file 

an opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an 

////

////

////

Case 2:13-cv-00722-JAM-GGH Document 25 Filed 01/14/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be 

dismissed. 

Dated: January 14, 2014

/thie0722.46h

Case 2:13-cv-00722-JAM-GGH Document 25 Filed 01/14/14 Page 2 of 2