Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00480/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00480-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES E. WASHINGTON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

PAUL M. SCHULTZ, )

)

Respondent. )

)

___________________________________ )

CV F 05-0480 OWW WMW HC

ORDER DENYING 

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

ORDER DENYING

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

[Doc. 29]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On May 4, 2005, the court entered an order denying

Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel.

Petitioner now asks the court to reconsider its prior order. After carefully considering

Petitioner’s arguments, the court finds no basis for reconsideration of its prior order. See

Local Rule 78-230(k). In particular, the court finds speculative Petitioner’s assertions that

Case 1:05-cv-00480-LJO -WMW Document 32 Filed 04/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

he will be unable to draft a traverse in this case. Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion is

HEREBY DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

bl0dc4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00480-LJO -WMW Document 32 Filed 04/13/07 Page 2 of 2