Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03060/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03060-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT E. COFIELD,

Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-3060 EFB P

vs.

UNKNOWN,

ORDER AND

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 5, 2013, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to

amend. The dismissal order explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file

an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an

amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The 30-day

period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to

the court’s order.

////

////

////

1

Case 2:12-cv-03060-KJM-EFB Document 13 Filed 04/09/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a

United States District Judge to this case.

Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED. Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(b); E. D. Cal. Local Rule 110, 183(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: April 8, 2013.

2

Case 2:12-cv-03060-KJM-EFB Document 13 Filed 04/09/13 Page 2 of 2