Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02264/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02264-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-2264 MCE GGH P

vs.

J. HARTLEY,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed September 15, 2009, petitioner’s application was dismissed and

thirty days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. Plaintiff filed a motion for

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order, which was denied by Judge Morrison England,

Jr., on October 22, 2009. To date, petitioner has not filed an amended application.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:09-cv-02264-MCE -GGH Document 14 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 8, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

hern2264.fta

Case 2:09-cv-02264-MCE -GGH Document 14 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 2