Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00132/USCOURTS-azd-4_06-cv-00132-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James E. Jolley, Jr. 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Greg Fizer, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-132-TUC-FRZ (JM)

ORDER

Petitioner James E. Jolley, Jr., represented by counsel, filed the instant Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on March

16, 2006, challenging his judgment and conviction for child abuse of a person under fifteen

(15) years of age pursuant to A.R.S. 13-3623(B)(1), entered in the Pima County Superior

Court for the State of Arizona on April 30, 2001. 

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Marshall for

all pretrial proceedings and report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions

of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LRCiv 72.1 and LRCiv 72.2 of the Rules of Practice of the

United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Local Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Magistrate Judge Marshall issued her Report and Recommendation on April 28, 2009,

setting forth the factual and procedural background of the underlying case and a thorough

analysis of the issues presented. 

Case 4:06-cv-00132-FRZ Document 22 Filed 09/30/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Report and Recommendation recommends that the District Court, after its

independent review of the record and all matters submitted, enter its order dismissing with

prejudice Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

The parties were given notice that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and Rules 72(b) and

6(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the parties had ten (10) days after being

served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation to file written objections. No

objections were filed. 

The Court, having made an independent review of the record herein, orders as

follows:

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Marshall’s Report and Recommendation

[Doc. #21] is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions

of law by this Court;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DENIED and that is case is hereby dismissed with prejudice; 

Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

DATED this 30th day of September, 2009.

Case 4:06-cv-00132-FRZ Document 22 Filed 09/30/09 Page 2 of 2