Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06063/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06063-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 29:206 Collect Unpaid Wages

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation Extending Defendants’ Time to Respond to Complaint

LINDA VAN WINKLE DEACON (State Bar No. 60133)

ldeacon@bpdzylaw.com

DAVID H. BATE (State Bar No. 133123)

dbate@bpdzylaw.com

BATE, PETERSON, DEACON, ZINN & YOUNG LLP

888 South Figueroa Street, Fifteenth Floor

Los Angeles, California 90017

Telephone: (213) 362-1860

Facsimile: (213) 362-1861

Attorneys for Defendants

FREMONT GENERAL CORPORATION

FREMONT GENERAL CREDIT CORPORATION

FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MATTHEW SCHEID and MELTON

MCCLANAHAN, JR., on behalf of

themselves and others similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FREMONT GENERAL

CORPORATION, a corporation, 

FREMONT GENERAL CREDIT

CORPORATION, a corporation, and

FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN,

a corporation, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C07-06063 (CRB)

Assigned for all purposes to:

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

STIPULATION EXTENDING

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Hearing Date: N/A

Time: N/A

Courtroom:

Plaintiffs Matthew Scheid and Melton McClanahan, Jr. (collectively,

“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Fremont General Corporation, Fremont General Credit

Corporation and Fremont Investment & Loan (collectively, “Defendants”), by and

through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate and agree pursuant to

Case 3:07-cv-06063-CRB Document 17 Filed 01/24/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation Extending Defendants’ Time to Respond to Complaint

2

Stipulation Extending Defendants’ Time to Respond to Complaint

Local Rule 6.1(a) of the Civil Local Rules of the Court that the time for Defendants,

and each of them, to respond to the Complaint in this matter be extended to and

including January 25, 2008. The stipulated extension will not alter the date of any

event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. 

DATED: January 18, 2008 BATE, PETERSON, DEACON, ZINN &

YOUNG LLP

By: _______/s/ David H. Bate__________

DAVID H. BATE

Attorneys for Defendants

FREMONT GENERAL CORPORATION

FREMONT GENERAL CREDIT

CORPORATION

FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN

GOLDSTEIN, DEMCHAK, BALLER,

BORGEN & DARDARIAN

By:________/s/ Roberta L. Steele________

Roberta L. Steele

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures

indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.

_________/s/ David H. Bate__________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

January 23, 2008

Case 3:07-cv-06063-CRB Document 17 Filed 01/24/08 Page 2 of 2