Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00446/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00446-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADRIAN MOON,

 Plaintiff,

v.

HOLLAND, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00446-LJO-JLT (PC)

ORDER DISREGARDING MOTIONS 

FOR RECONSIDERATION

(Docs. 7, 8)

Plaintiff, Adrian Moon, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on March 18, 2015. 

This action was dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and an apparent reaction to the recent 

closure of Plaintiff's prior action Moon v. Holland, 1:14-cv-1704-LJO-JLT (PC) ("Prior Action"). 

(Doc. 5.) In the four short months that Plaintiff's Prior Action was pending, Plaintiff filed 

multiple motions seeking temporary restraining orders, reconsideration of the denial of in forma 

pauperis status, seeking sanctions, and seeking extensions of time and has variously objected 

and/or sought reconsideration of findings and recommendations and orders that issued in this 

action. (See id., at Docs. 4, 11, 12, 14-19, 21-24.) 

Now before the Court are two documents that Plaintiff recently filed: a motion to appoint 

counsel and a letter to the Clerk of this Court enclosing a motion to recuse District Judge 

Lawrence J. O'Neill and the undersigned from this action. (Docs. 7, 8.) This action is no longer 

Case 1:15-cv-00446-LJO-JLT Document 9 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

pending for Plaintiff to be appointed counsel by this court and Plaintiff's efforts to recuse Judge 

O'Neill and the undersigned have previously, repeatedly been addressed -- both in the order 

dismissing this action and in Plaintiff's Prior Action.

Accordingly, because this matter is closed and Plaintiff's issues have previously, 

repeatedly been addressed, the Court will DISREGARD the current filings. NO FURTHER 

FILINGS WILL BE ACCEPTED IN THIS CASE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00446-LJO-JLT Document 9 Filed 04/14/15 Page 2 of 2