Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02931/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02931-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C 03-02931 MJJ

MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 064307 

JAMES C. YOON, State Bar No. 177155 

MICHAEL A. BERTA, State Bar No. 194650 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANDISK CORPORATION 

MARK E. FERGUSON (pro hac vice)

TAREK ISMAIL (pro hac vice)

KASPAR J. STOFFELMAYR (pro hac vice)

BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 

Courthouse Place 

54 West Hubbard Street, Suite 300 

Chicago, IL 60610 

Telephone: (312) 494-4400 

Facsimile: (312) 494-4440 

D. PETER HARVEY, State Bar No. 55712 

RANJITSINH MAHIDA, State Bar No. 206741 

HARVEY SISKIND JACOBS LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 354-0100 

Facsimile: (415) 391-7124 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SANDISK CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, a German 

corporation, and DOES I to X; 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C 03-02931 MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER WITHDRAWING

COUNTERCLAIM AND

DISMISSING CLAIMS

REGARDING U.S. PATENT NO.

6,026,002 

Judge: Hon. Martin J. Jenkins 

L.R. 7-12 

Case 3:03-cv-02931 Document 136 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-02931-MJJ Document 138 Filed 03/17/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C 03-02931 MJJ

-2- 2834229_1.DOC 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, plaintiff SanDisk Corporation (“SanDisk”) and defendant 

Infineon Technologies AG (“Infineon”) jointly submit this stipulation and [proposed] order 

withdrawing all claims and counterclaims regarding U.S. Patent No. 6,026,002 (the “’002 

patent”). 

1. Infineon filed its amended counterclaim asserting infringement of the ‘002 patent 

by SanDisk in paragraphs 6 through 12 on August 12, 2004 (“Amended Counterclaim”). 

2. SanDisk filed its second amended complaint asserting noninfringement, invalidity 

and unenforceability of the ‘002 patent in paragraphs 5 through 35 on February 9, 2006 (“Second 

Amended Complaint” or “SAC”). 

3. The parties have entered into an agreement whereby Infineon has covenanted not 

to assert the ‘002 patent against SanDisk or its customers and manufacturers for infringement 

based upon the products that are the subject of SanDisk’s request for declaratory judgment of 

noninfringement of the ‘002 patent as contained in SanDisk’s Second Amended Complaint; and 

whereby SanDisk has agreed to dismiss without prejudice its claims against Infineon for 

declaratory judgment of noninfringement, invalidity and unenforceability of the ‘002 patent. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, 

that: 

Infineon’s counterclaim for infringement of the ‘002 patent, as contained in the First 

Claim for Relief of the Amended Counterclaim (¶¶ 6-12) and its prayer for relief, shall be 

dismissed without prejudice; and 

SanDisk’s requests for declaratory judgment of noninfringement, invalidity and 

unenforceability of the ‘002 patent, as contained in Causes of Action One, Two and Three of the 

SAC (¶¶ 5- 35) and its prayer for relief, shall be dismissed without prejudice. 

Dated: March 16, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ 

Michael A. Berta 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-defendant 

SANDISK CORPORATION 

Case 3:03-cv-02931 Document 136 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:03-cv-02931-MJJ Document 138 Filed 03/17/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C 03-02931 MJJ

-3- 2834229_1.DOC 

Dated: March 16, 2006 BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR 

& SCOTT LLP 

By: /s/ 

Kaspar J. Stoffelmayr 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

ECF CERTIFICATION

I, Michael A. Berta, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WITHDRAWING COUNTERCLAIM 

AND DISMISSING CLAIMS REGARDING U.S. PATENT NO. 6,026,002. In compliance 

with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Kaspar Stoffelmayr has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: March 16, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ 

Michael A. Berta 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANDISK CORPORATION 

Case 3:03-cv-02931 Document 136 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 3 of 3

3/20/2006

Case 3:03-cv-02931-MJJ Document 138 Filed 03/17/06 Page 3 of 3