Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-267/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-03561 WHA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART

ORACLE’S SEALING MOTION

Oracle has moved to file under seal one sentence of its motion to disqualify Dr. Kearl

and the entirety of Exhibit 5 to the declaration of Peter A. Bicks submitted in support of that

motion. Those documents contain or otherwise reflect materials from the Apple v. Samsung

case that were designated “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL —

ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” pursuant to the protective order in this matter by Apple or

Samsung. Apple has filed a supporting declaration averring that pages 5–10 of Exhibit 5 reflect

confidential unit sales and disclaiming confidentiality interests in the remaining materials

sought to be sealed (Dkt. No. 1343). Samsung has filed a notice disclaiming any confidentiality

interest in the materials, except to the extent asserted by Apple (Dkt. No. 1344). Good cause

shown, Oracle may file pages 5–10 of Exhibit 5 of the Bicks declaration under seal. All other

materials shall be filed on the public docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 20, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1345 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 1