Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00706/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00706-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 690
Nature of Suit: Other Forfeiture and Penalty Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

United States Attorney

KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916)554-2700

Attorneys for the United States 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2541

ZUIDER ZEE CIRCLE, ELVERTA,

CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY,

APN: 203-0211-030-0000, INCLUDING

ALL APPURTENANCES AND

IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, et al.,

 Defendants.

2:12-CV-00706-MCE-DAD

JOINT STATUS REPORT,

REQUEST FOR STAY, AND

ORDER THEREON 

The parties submit the following Joint Status Report, Request for Stay, and

Order Thereon (Proposed) pursuant to the Court's May 14, 2012 Order:

1. Summary of Claims

On March 20, 2012, the United States filed a civil forfeiture complaint against

the following real properties: 2541 Zuider Zee Circle, Elverta, California; 3908 Floral

Drive, North Highlands, California; 7230 Arutas Drive, North Highlands, California;

7354 Washburn Way, North Highlands, California; 2304 Mortenson Court, Elverta,

California; 7920 Bellingrath Drive, Elverta, California; 2948 Candido Drive,

1 Joint Status Report, Request for Stay, and Order Thereon 

 

Case 2:12-cv-00706-TLN-AC Document 25 Filed 07/06/12 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sacramento, California; 1550 Kellogg Street, Newcastle, California; 1410 Kellogg

Street, Newcastle, California; and 439 Ala Wai Boulevard, Unit 94, South Lake Tahoe,

California.

The complaint alleges that several individuals conspired to defraud the United

Auburn Indian Community out of millions of dollars by submitting inflated and false

change order invoices as part of a large commercial construction project; the complaint

seeks the forfeiture of real properties purchased with fraud proceeds and/or funds

involved in the money laundering scheme.

Gregory S. Baker and Dawn Baker filed claims on May 24, 2012. Darrell Hinz

also filed a claim on May 24, 2012.

Federal National Mortgage Association has filed a claim and answer to 439 Ala

Wai Boulevard, Unit 94, South Lake Tahoe, California.

Federal National Mortgage Association and Mortgage Electronic Registration

Systems has filed a claim and answer to 1410 Kellogg Street, Newcastle, California. 

2. Service:

The forfeiture complaint in rem was sent to all individuals believed to have an

interest in the defendant properties. In addition, notice by publication is complete, as

reflected in a declaration of publication filed June 21, 2012.

 

3. Possible joinder of additional parties:

None Anticipated.

4. Any expected or desired amendment of pleadings:

None anticipated at this time.

5. Jurisdiction and venue:

This Court has jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1345 and 28

2 Joint Status Report, Request for Stay, and Order Thereon 

 

Case 2:12-cv-00706-TLN-AC Document 25 Filed 07/06/12 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S.C. § 1355(a). Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1355 and 28

U.S.C. § 1395(a).

6. Anticipated motions and suggested dates:

In light of the parties' joint request for a three month stay (see below), the

parties do not request that motion dates be scheduled at this time.

7. Anticipated and outstanding discovery:

(1) What changes should be made in the timing, form, or

requirement for disclosures under Rule 26(a), including a

statement as to when disclosures under subdivision (a)(1)

were made or will be made:

(2) The subjects on which discovery may be needed, when

discovery should be completed, and whether discovery should

be conducted in phases or be limited to or focused upon

particular issues: 

(3) What changes should be made in the limitations on discovery

imposed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of the

Local Rules, and what other limitations should be imposed:

As of the December 1, 2006, amendments to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, civil forfeiture actions are now exempt from the initial disclosure

requirements applicable to most other civil actions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(E)(ii).

In addition, rather than fully schedule this case at this time, the parties jointly

request a three month stay of further proceedings in this matter.

The stay is requested pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1), 981(g)(2) and 21 U.S.C.

§ 881(i). The United States contends that the defendant properties were purchased

with fraud proceeds and/or constitute funds involved in money laundering offenses; 

and, as such, are forfeitable to the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A) and 18

U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C). 

The United States intends to depose claimants Gregory S. Baker and Darrell

Hinz regarding their claims and the alleged fraud and money laundering activities

forming the basis of this in rem action. If discovery proceeds at this time, claimants

3 Joint Status Report, Request for Stay, and Order Thereon 

 

Case 2:12-cv-00706-TLN-AC Document 25 Filed 07/06/12 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

will be placed in the difficult position of either invoking their Fifth Amendment right

against self-incrimination and losing the ability to pursue their claims to the defendant

properties, or waiving their Fifth Amendment rights and submitting to a deposition

and potentially incriminating themselves. If they invoke their Fifth Amendment

rights, the United States will be deprived of the ability to explore the factual basis for

the claims they filed with this court. 

In addition, claimants intend to depose the law enforcement officers involved in

the criminal investigation. While no indictment has been filed, allowing depositions of

the law enforcement officers at this time would adversely affect the ability of federal

authorities to investigate potential criminal violations. The same is true with respect

to written discovery that could be issued by the United States and claimants.

 Accordingly, the parties recognize that proceeding with this action at this time

has potential adverse affects on the investigation of the underlying criminal conduct

and/or upon the claimants’ ability to prove their claims to the property and assert any

defenses to forfeiture. For these reasons, the parties jointly request that this matter be

stayed for three months. At that time the parties will advise the court of the status of

the criminal investigation and will advise the court whether a further stay is

necessary.

8. Scheduling of future proceedings, including suggested

timing of the disclosure of expert witnesses and

information required by Rule 26(a)(2), completion

dates for discovery and law and motion, and dates for

final pretrial conference and trial:

In light of the requested stay, the parties ask that the case not be

scheduled at this time. 

9. Estimate of trial time:

Plaintiff estimates that a trial of this matter would take no more than ten days. 

4 Joint Status Report, Request for Stay, and Order Thereon 

 

Case 2:12-cv-00706-TLN-AC Document 25 Filed 07/06/12 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10. Appropriateness of special procedures:

Not applicable.

11. Modification of standard pretrial procedures because

of the relative simplicity or complexity of the action

or proceedings:

Not applicable.

12. Whether the case is related to any other case,

including any matters in bankruptcy:

Yes. United States v. Real Property Located at 149 G Street, Lincoln, California,

et al., 2:12-CV-00705-MCE-DAD.

On May 25, 2012, the United States also filed a notice to relate this in rem

action to 2:12-CV-01631-MCE-DAD and 2:12-CV-01632-MCE-DAD. 

13. Prospects for settlement:

The parties are unable to assess the likelihood of settlement at this time.

14. Any other matters that may add to the just and

expeditious disposition of this matter:

None.

Dated: 7/3/12 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

 By: /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian 

KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

5 Joint Status Report, Request for Stay, and Order Thereon 

 

Case 2:12-cv-00706-TLN-AC Document 25 Filed 07/06/12 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: 7/3/12 /s/ Tom Johnson 

TOM JOHNSON

Attorney for claimants Gregory S. Baker

and Dawn Baker

Dated: 7/3/12 /s/ William J. Portanova 

WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA

Attorney for claimant Darrell Hinz

Dated: 7/3/12 /s/ Cheryl Chang 

CHERYL CHANG

Attorney for claimant Federal National

Mortgage Association and Mortgage

Electronic Registration Systems, Inc

Dated: 7/3/12 /s/ Jonathan D. Fink 

JONATHAN D. FINK

Attorney for claimant Federal National

Mortgage Association

(Signatures authorized by email)

ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, this matter is stayed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§

981(g)(1), 981(g)(2) and 21 U.S.C. § 881(i) for three months. On or before October 9,

2012, the parties will advise the Court whether a further stay is necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 5, 2012

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6 Joint Status Report, Request for Stay, and Order Thereon 

 

Case 2:12-cv-00706-TLN-AC Document 25 Filed 07/06/12 Page 6 of 6