Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00955/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00955-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 

DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 

5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 

PMB #253 

CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 

TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 

FAX (916) 481-4224 

E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net

Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Scott N. Johnson 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., et 

al 

 Defendants 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.2:10-cv-00955-MCE-DAD

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

RE: EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL 

JUNE 29, 2010 FOR DEFENDANTS 

SAFELITE FULFILLMENT, INC. 

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A SAFELITE 

AUTO GLASS #222/1843; BRENT 

JOHNSON INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A 

SAFELITE AUTO GLASS #222/1843 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

)

)

 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a), Plaintiff Scott N. 

Johnson and Defendants, Safelite Fulfillment, Inc. 

Individually and d/b/a Safelite Auto Glass #222/1843; Brent 

Johnson Individually and d/b/a Safelite Auto Glass 

#222/1843, by and through their respective attorneys of 

record, Scott N. Johnson; Brian M. DiMasi, stipulate as 

follows: 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:10-cv-00955-MCE -DAD Document 8 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. No extension of time has been previously 

obtained. 

2. Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc. 

Individually and d/b/a Safelite Auto Glass 

#222/1843; Brent Johnson Individually and d/b/a 

Safelite Auto Glass #222/1843 are granted an 

extension until June 29, 2010 to respond or 

otherwise plead reference to Plaintiff’s 

complaint. 

3. Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc. 

Individually and d/b/a Safelite Auto Glass 

#222/1843; Brent Johnson Individually and d/b/a 

Safelite Auto Glass #222/1843 response will be 

due no later than June 29, 2010. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of June 4, 2010 

Dated: June 7, 2010 ______/s/____________ 

Brian M. DiMasi, 

Attorney for Defendants 

 Safelite Fulfillment, 

 Inc. Individually and 

 d/b/a Safelite Auto 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:10-cv-00955-MCE -DAD Document 8 Filed 06/11/10 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Glass #222/1843; Brent 

 Johnson Individually and 

 d/b/a Safelite Auto 

 Glass #222/1843 

 

Dated: June 4, 2010 /s/Scott N. Johnson ____

 Scott N. Johnson, 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

IT IS SO ORDERED: that Defendants Safelite 

Fulfillment, Inc. Individually and d/b/a Safelite Auto 

Glass #222/1843; Brent Johnson Individually and d/b/a 

Safelite Auto Glass #222/1843 shall have until June 29, 

2010 to respond to complaint. 

Dated: June 10, 2010 

________________________________

__ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:10-cv-00955-MCE -DAD Document 8 Filed 06/11/10 Page 3 of 3