Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-01423/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-01423-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 08-1423 PJH 

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC 

DM_US:21249129_1

HOWREY LLP

Henry C. Bunsow (SBN 60707) 

bunsowh@howrey.com

Denise M. De Mory (SBN 168076) 

demoryd@howrey.com

HOWREY LLP 

525 Market Street, Suite 3600 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 848-4900 

Facsimile: (415) 848-4999 

Elizabeth Hoult Fontaine (SBN 207557) 

fontainee@howrey.com

HOWREY LLP 

4 Park Plaza, Suite 1700 

Irvine, California 92614 

Telephone: (949) 721-6900 

Facsimile: (949) 721-6910 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AUTHENTEC, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

AuthenTec, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Atrua Technologies, Inc., a California 

corporation, 

Defendant. 

 Case No. C 08-1423 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE FROM JULY 3, 2008 TO 

JULY 10, 2008 

Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

Date: July 3, 2008 

Time: 2:30 p.m. 

Ctrm: Courtroom 3, 17th Floor 

1. This Court’s May 8, 2008 Order Setting Case Management Conference (Dkt. No. 18) 

scheduled an initial Case Management Conference for July 3, 2008 in the above-entitled action. 

2. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties agree to continue the Case Management 

Conference in the above-entitled action one week to July 10, 2008 at 2:30 p.m. due to a scheduling 

conflict. 

3. The only time modification made thus far in the case was a stipulation between the 

parties extending for 30 days the time for Defendant Atrua Technologies, Inc. to answer Plaintiff 

AuthenTec, Inc.’s complaint. No other time modifications have been made, and the continuance of the 

Case Management Conference for one week will not adversely affect the schedule for the case. 

Case 4:08-cv-01423-PJH Document 24 Filed 06/16/08 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 08-1423 PJH 

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC 

-2- 

DM_US:21249129_1

HOWREY LLP

DATED: June 6,2008 Respectfully submitted, 

HOWREY LLP 

By: /s/ Denise M. De Mory 

Denise M. De Mory 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AUTHENTEC, INC. 

DATED: June 6,2008 GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP 

By: /s/ J. James Li 

 J. James Li 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ATRUA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________, 2008 

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

United States District Court Judge 

June 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:08-cv-01423-PJH Document 24 Filed 06/16/08 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C 08-1423 PJH 

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC 

-3- 

DM_US:21249129_1

HOWREY LLP

CERTIFICATION BY DENISE M. DE MORY PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE NO. 45, 

SECTION X. RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California, and am an attorney in 

the law firm of Howrey LLP, counsel for plaintiff AuthenTec, Inc. The statements herein are made on 

my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness I could and would testify thereto. 

2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that concurrence 

has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared document with the 

Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for 

subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party until one 

year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct on June 6, 2008. 

/s/ Denise M. De Mory 

Denise M. De Mory 

Case 4:08-cv-01423-PJH Document 24 Filed 06/16/08 Page 3 of 3