Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01420/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01420-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jamerson C. Allen (SBN 132866)

Allison M. Dibley (SBN 213104)

JACKSON LEWIS LLP

199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 394-9400

Facsimile: (415) 394-9401

Attorneys for Defendant

COMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL

CALIFORNIA, INC. dba UNIVERSITY MEDICAL

CENTER and dba COMMUNITY MEDICAL

CENTERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

JANICE BESTE, individually and as Successor in

Interest to DONALD BESTE,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL

CALIFORNIA, INC., dba UNIVERSITY

MEDICAL CENTER and dba COMMUNITY

MEDICAL CENTERS and DOES 1 though 10,

inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:05 CV-01420-AWI-SMS

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE

HEARING DATE OF DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT (L.R. 83-141, 6-142);

ORDER

Complaint Filed: 11/10/05

TO THE HONORABLE ANTHONY W. ISHII AND THE CLERK OF THE U.S. DISTRICT

COURT:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE Defendant COMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL

CALIFORNIA, INC. dba UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and dba COMMUNITY MEDICAL

CENTERS, and Plaintiff JANICE BESTE, individually and as Successor in Interest to DONALD

BESTE, through their respective attorneys of record hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

Counsel for Plaintiff is presently evaluating whether this action can be dismissed

without prejudicewithout the necessity of having to oppose Defendant’s motion. Therefore, to allow

Case 1:05-cv-01420-AWI -SMS Document 14 Filed 12/23/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

counsel for Plaintiff sufficient time to receive and review the proper documentation and not devote

time, energy or resources to opposing a motion which ultimately may not be contested the parties

agree to continue the hearing date on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint from

Monday, January 9, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. to Monday, February 13, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3,

or as soon thereafter as the Court deems appropriate; 

The deadline for Plaintiff’s filing the opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

is similarly continued to Monday, January 30, 2006; and 

The deadline for Defendant to file any reply to Plaintiff’s opposition is continued to

Monday, February 6, 2006.

Dated: December __, 2005 PERRY, JOHNSON, ANDERSON, MILLER &

MOSKOWITZ, LLP

By

Michael G. Miller, Esq. (SBN 136491)

Anne C. D’Arcy (SBN 232948)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JANICE BESTE, individually and as Successor

in Interest to DONALD BESTE

Dated:

December __, 2005 JACKSON LEWIS LLP

By

Jamerson C. Allen

Allison M. Dibley

Attorneys for Defendant

COMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL

CALIFORNIA, INC. dba UNIVERSITY

MEDICAL CENTER and dba COMMUNITY

MEDICAL CENTERS

Case 1:05-cv-01420-AWI -SMS Document 14 Filed 12/23/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

ORDER

The hearing date for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby

continued to February 13, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion,

if any, must be filed by January 30, 2006. Defendant’s reply to Plaintiff’s opposition must be filed

by February 6, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 23, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01420-AWI -SMS Document 14 Filed 12/23/05 Page 3 of 3