Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02962/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-02962-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LILLIE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 18-cv-02962-DMR 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD 

NOT BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY

Re: Dkt. Nos. 45, 47

On December 26, 2018, the parties submitted a proposed briefing schedule for dispositive 

motions on the issue of the duty to defend, which the court entered as an order on January 2, 2019. 

[Docket Nos. 34, 35.] Pursuant to the order, the deadline for each of the parties to file motions for 

summary judgment or partial summary judgment as to that issue was April 8, 2019. [See Docket 

No. 35.] Additionally, the last day to file dispositive motions was April 8, 2019. [Docket No. 33.] 

Instead of complying with the court-ordered briefing schedule, Defendant Kinsale Insurance 

Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on April 16, 2019 and a motion for summary 

judgment on April 22, 2019. It also noticed its motion for summary judgment for hearing on less 

than 35 days notice in violation of Local Rule 7-2(a). Accordingly, the court orders Defendant to 

respond by April 29, 2019 and show cause why its motions to dismiss and for summary judgment 

should not be denied as untimely.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 24, 2019

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:18-cv-02962-DMR Document 48 Filed 04/24/19 Page 1 of 1