Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-03390/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-03390-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORLANDO LOPEZ,

Petitioner,

 v.

WILLIAM MUNIZ,

Respondent. /

No. C 17-03390 WHA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

RESPONDENT’S

APPLICATION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

On February 5, respondent William Muniz requested a 60-day extension of time in

which to file a response to the order to show cause (Dkt. No. 8). Despite the fact that petitioner

Orlando Lopez is represented by counsel, respondent’s application states that petitioner is

representing himself, and for that reason he did not attempt to contact petitioner in connection

with this request. Petitioner, however, has not filed an objection to the requested extension. 

Good cause appearing, respondent shall have until MARCH 29, 2018 to respond to the

order to show cause. If respondent files an answer, petitioner may file a traverse within

THIRTY DAYS of the date respondent’s answer is filed. If respondent files a motion to dismiss,

petitioner shall file an opposition (or statement of non-opposition) within THIRTY DAYS of the

date the motion is filed, and respondent shall file a reply within FIFTEEN DAYS of any

opposition. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 9, 2018. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-03390-WHA Document 13 Filed 02/09/18 Page 1 of 1