Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00612/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00612-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY S. DAUBERT, ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

A-1 Tours and Travel, )

 )

Defendant. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-00612-OWW-SMS 

ORDER EITHER TO FILE WITHIN

FIFTEEN DAYS OF SERVICE OF THIS

ORDER AN AMENDED COMPLAINT OR

NOTICE, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE,

TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT

SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT THE

ACTION BE DISMISSED (DOC. 5)

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with an action for damages 

concerning alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities

Act. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304.

By order dated June 8, 2006, the Court screened Plaintiff’s

original complaint filed on May 18, 2006, and Plaintiff was given

leave to file a first amended complaint or to file a statement of

intention to proceed with respect to a portion of the original

complaint. The deadline was thirty days after June 8, 2006, the

date of service of that order on Plaintiff. Plaintiff has not

filed either a first amended complaint or a notice of intention

Case 1:06-cv-00612-OWW -SMS Document 7 Filed 08/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

to proceed on the originally filed complaint. The Court notes

that the docket reflects that on August 2, 2006, counsel

substituted in for Plaintiff.

No later than fifteen days after the date of this order,

Plaintiff shall either 1) file a first amended complaint or

statement of intention to proceed on a portion of the original

complaint, or 2) show cause why the undersigned Magistrate Judge

should not recommend to the District Judge that Plaintiff’s case

be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the Court and

to prosecute this action.

Further, Plaintiff IS INFORMED that a failure to file a

statement of intention to proceed on the original complaint or an

amended complaint in a timely manner, or to seek an extension of

time before the due date, will be considered a failure to comply

with an order of the Court and will result in a recommendation

that the action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 7, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00612-OWW -SMS Document 7 Filed 08/08/06 Page 2 of 2