Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05819/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05819-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY E. WALKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

KROL, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-05819-HSG 

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 

PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY 

WITH COURT ORDERS; SETTING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Re: Dkt. No. 19

Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that prison 

officials at San Francisco County Jail violated his constitutional rights. On August 16, 2016, 

Defendants informed the Court that they had been unable to reach Plaintiff because he had been 

released from the custody of the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department on May 10, 2016, but had not 

provided the Court or Defendants with notice of his new address. Docket No. 15. Defendants 

requested an extension of time to file their dispositive motion, stating that they need to depose 

Plaintiff in order to file a dispositive motion but had been unable to contact Plaintiff. Id.

On August 18, 2016, the Court ordered Plaintiff to comply with Civil Local Rule 3-11 and 

notify the Court and all parties of his new address. Docket No. 16. The Court stayed all deadlines 

pending Plaintiff’s compliance with Rule 3-11. Id. On October 4, 2016, Plaintiff informed the 

Court of his new address via phone. On October 12, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of 

address with the Court and requested an extension of time to comply with court orders. Docket 

No. 19. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time is DENIED AS MOOT. There are no Court 

orders requiring Plaintiff’s response.

The Court sets the following briefing schedule. By December 19, 2016, Defendants must 

file and serve a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Plaintiff’s opposition 

Case 4:15-cv-05819-HSG Document 20 Filed 10/17/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

to the summary judgment or other dispositive motion must be filed with the Court and served 

upon defendants no later than 28 days from the date the motion is filed. Defendants shall file a 

reply brief no later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed. 

This order terminates Docket No. 19.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

10/17/2016

Case 4:15-cv-05819-HSG Document 20 Filed 10/17/16 Page 2 of 2