Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04686/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04686-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 Clayton Andrew Perry, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

Mill Valley Police Department, et al.,

 Defendants.

_____________________________/

No. C 05-4686 WDB

ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST

FOR REASSIGNMENT,

SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE,

AND CONTINUING DATE FOR

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE 

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

This case was randomly assigned at filing to the undersigned United States Magistrate

Judge. Without the written consent of all parties to jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section

636(c), a Magistrate Judge may not hear and determine a motion that could be dispositive of

an action or a claim or defense. On January 10, 2006, defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss

Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) -- a potentially dispositive motion. In light of defendants'

pending motion, the Court asks the parties to consider the attached "Consent to Assignment

or Request for Reassignment," make an election, and file the consent or request for

reassignment by no later than January 23, 2006.

Plaintiffs' opposition is due March 2, 2006. Defendants' reply is due March 9, 2006.

If all parties consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(c),

the undersigned will conduct a hearing on defendants' motion on March 23, 2006, at 1:30

Case 4:05-cv-04686-WDB Document 9 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

p.m., in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, United States Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland,

California 94612.

If any party requests reassignment to a district judge, the March 23, 2006, date will

be vacated, and defendants' motion will be re-noticed for hearing before the district judge to

whom the case has been reassigned at the discretion of that judge.

///

In light of defendants' pending motion, the Initial Case Management Conference is

hereby CONTINUED to April 3, 2006, at 4:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2006 

WAYNE D. BRAZIL

United States Magistrate Judge

Enclosures

Copies to:

Parties, WDB, Stats.

Case 4:05-cv-04686-WDB Document 9 Filed 01/11/06 Page 2 of 2