Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04547/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04547-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

DLA PIPER

RUDNICK GRAY

CARY US LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- 

PA\10444734.1 

351912-990602 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NOS. C05-04100 VRW AND C05-04547 VRW

(AND RELATED CASES) 

MARK FOWLER (Bar No. 124235) mark.fowler@dlapiper.com

RONALD L. YIN (Bar No. 063266) ronald.yin@dlapiper.com 

GERALD T. SEKIMURA (Bar No. 095165) gerald.sekimura@dlapiper.com 

M. ELIZABETH DAY (Bar No. 177125) elizabeth.day@dlapiper.com

MEGAN OLESEK (Bar No. 191218) megan.olesek@dlapiper.com

VINCENT S. LAM (Bar No. 229355) vincent.lam@dlapiper.com

DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2248 

Tel: 650.833.2000 

Fax: 650.833.2001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX 

SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., and 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR 

MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C05-04100 VRW 

(AND RELATED CASES) 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX 

SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., and 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR 

MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C05-04547 VRW 

(AND RELATED CASES) 

Case 3:05-cv-04547-VRW Document 11 Filed 02/17/06 Page 1 of 4
DLA PIPER

RUDNICK GRAY

CARY US LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- 

PA\10444734.1 

351912-990602 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NOS. C05-04100 VRW AND C05-04547 VRW

(AND RELATED CASES)

Pursuant to ruling made during the case management conference on January 31, 2006, and 

subsequent meeting and conferring between the parties, the Court hereby sets the following 

pretrial schedule and limits discovery pending completion of claim construction, as follows: 

February 17, 2006: Parties Exchange Lists of Claim Terms for Construction By 

Court (Local Patent Rule 4-1) 

March 10, 2006: Parties Exchange Proposed Claim Constructions and 

Extrinsic Evidence (Local Patent Rule 4-2) 

March 24, 2006: Parties to File Joint Claim Construction Statement (Local 

Patent Rule 4-3) 

April 21, 2006: Parties to File Opening Claim Construction Brief (Local 

Patent Rule 4-5(a)) 

May 12, 2006: Parties to File Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Local 

Patent Rule 4-5(b)) 

May 31, 2006 Markman Hearing 

The following four Toshiba patents will be construed during this phase of the Markman 

proceedings: 

U.S. Patent No. 5,144,579 - claims 1-3, 6, 8, 9 

U.S. Patent No. 5,880,994 - claims 1-2, 4-5, 7-8, 10-12, 18-19, 21-22 

U.S. Patent No. 6,424,588 - claims 1-4 

U.S. Patent No. 6,342,715 - claims 1, 3, 5 

The parties’ Opening Claim Construction Briefs will be limited to 35 pages and the 

parties’ Responsive Claim Construction Briefs will be limited to 20 pages. No declarations of 

experts shall accompany any of the claim construction briefs. The parties will meet and confer to 

establish a reasonable number of terms to be construed given the page limitations of the briefs. 

However, if, after the May 31, 2006 Markman Hearing, the parties decide that additional terms 

need to be construed, the parties agree that these proceedings are not a waiver of their right to 

seek construction of those additional terms. Additionally, the parties do not waive their right to 

seek construction of the other patents at issue in these cases that are not a part of this phase of the 

Markman proceedings. 

All discovery not reasonably related to claim construction issues shall be stayed pending 

@ 9:30 a.m.

Case 3:05-cv-04547-VRW Document 11 Filed 02/17/06 Page 2 of 4
DLA PIPER

RUDNICK GRAY

CARY US LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3- 

PA\10444734.1 

351912-990602 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NOS. C05-04100 VRW AND C05-04547 VRW

(AND RELATED CASES)

the Court’s Claim Construction Order, absent agreement of the parties or order of the Court. 

Dated: February 7, 2006 DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP 

By /s/ Vincent Lam 

MARK FOWLER 

RONALD L. YIN 

GERALD T. SEKIMURA 

M. ELIZABETH DAY 

MEGAN OLESEK 

VINCENT LAM 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION 

Dated: February 7, 2006 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

By /s/ Igor Shoiket 

DANIEL J. FURNISS 

GREGORY S. BISHOP 

IGOR SHOIKET 

ROBERT G. LITTS 

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

Kenneth L. Nissly 

Susan Van Keulen 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX 

SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC. and 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR 

MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: , 2006 

VAUGHN R. WALKER 

United States District Judge 

February 17

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:05-cv-04547-VRW Document 11 Filed 02/17/06 Page 3 of 4
DLA PIPER

RUDNICK GRAY

CARY US LLP 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-4- 

PA\10444734.1 

351912-990602 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER / CASE NOS. C05-04100 VRW AND C05-04547 VRW

(AND RELATED CASES)

GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION 

 I, Vincent Lam, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulated [Proposed] Scheduling Order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby 

attest that Igor Shoiket has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: February 7, 2006 

 By /s/ Vincent Lam 

 VINCENT LAM 

Case 3:05-cv-04547-VRW Document 11 Filed 02/17/06 Page 4 of 4