Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02366/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02366-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUSTAVO ADRIAN PRIEGO,

Plaintiff,

v.

SULLIVAN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-02366-JD 

ORDER 

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with a civil rights complaint. He alleges that 

defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Defendants filed a motion 

for summary judgment on June 8, 2015, that argued there was no deliberate indifference to serious 

medical needs and defendants were entitled to qualified immunity. Plaintiff has filed an 

opposition and defendants filed a reply. Plaintiff has also filed a motion to compel. 

The Court previously stayed discovery until the threshold question of qualified immunity 

is settled. However, the Court did allow plaintiff to identify specific documents from his medical 

file that he requires to oppose summary judgment and does not possess and the Court would 

consider ordering them to be produced. Plaintiff seeks outcome study/data regarding his treatment 

on October 11, 2012, December 10, 2012, January 4, 2013, and April 16, 2013. He states they are 

referenced in the motion for summary judgment but he does not have them. Within fourteen (14) 

days, defendant shall either provide plaintiff this information, or respond why the information

should not be provided.1

 

1 All of plaintiff’s other requests are denied.

Case 3:14-cv-02366-JD Document 70 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

CONCLUSION

Within fourteen (14) days, defendant shall either provide the information discussed above 

or respond why the information should not be provided. The Court will rule on the motion to 

compel after defendant files a response.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 15, 2015

________________________

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-02366-JD Document 70 Filed 12/15/15 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUSTAVO ADRIAN PRIEGO,

Plaintiff,

v.

SULLIVAN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-02366-JD 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on December 15, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by 

placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by 

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery 

receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Gustavo Adrian Priego ID: P-87815

PBSP-SHU (C/3 #205)

P.O. Box 7500

Crescent City, CA 95532 

Dated: December 15, 2015

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District Court

By:________________________

LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the 

Honorable JAMES DONATO

Case 3:14-cv-02366-JD Document 70 Filed 12/15/15 Page 3 of 3