Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03730/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03730-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

M

M

20

Xa

its 

an

ap

wit

infr

dis

spe

infr

co

an

Da

MELLANOX 

v. 

METHODE E

Defend

16. Plaintif

avier Brandw

counsel, D

d carefully 

pearing, the

th leave to a

The mo

ringement a

smissal of p

ecifically al

ringement. 

mplaint in a

swer or oth

IT IS S

ated: March

N

TECHNOL

Plaintiff, 

ELECTRON

Defendan

dant’s motio

ff Mellanox 

wajn. Defe

David Newm

considered

e court here

amend, as 

otion is DE

allegations,

plaintiff’s ind

lege facts r

 Plaintiff sh

accordance

herwise res

SO ORDER

h 4, 2016 

UNITED 

NORTHER

LOGIES, LT

NICS, INC.

t. 

on to dismis

Technolog

endant Meth

man. Havin

d the argum

eby GRANT

stated at th

NIED to the

, but GRAN

direct infring

regarding e

hall have un

e with this o

pond to the

RED. 

STATES D

RN DISTRIC

TD.,

, 

ss came on

gies, Ltd. (“p

hode Electr

g read the 

ments and th

TS in part a

he hearing.

e extent tha

NTED with l

gement alle

each elemen

ntil March 2

order. Defe

e complaint

__

PH

Un

DISTRICT C

CT OF CAL

Case No.

ORDER G

DENYING

DISMISS

n for hearin

plaintiff”) ap

ronics, Inc.

papers filed

he relevant

and DENIE

at it seeks d

eave to am

egations. A

nt of induce

23, 2016 to

endant shall

. 

__________

HYLLIS J. H

nited States

COURT 

LIFORNIA 

15-cv-3730

GRANTING

G IN PART 

g before th

ppeared thr

(“defendan

d in conjun

t legal autho

ES in part de

dismissal of

mend to the 

Any amende

ed infringem

o file a seco

l have 21 d

__________

HAMILTON

s District Ju

0-PJH 

G IN PART A

MOTION T

is court on 

rough its co

nt”) appeare

ction with t

ority, and g

efendant’s 

f plaintiff’s d

extent that

ed complai

ment and co

ond amende

ays thereaf

__________

udge 

AND 

TO 

March 2, 

ounsel, 

ed through 

he motion 

good cause 

motion, 

direct 

t it seeks 

nt must 

ontributory 

ed 

fter to 

_______ 

Case 4:15-cv-03730-PJH Document 43 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 1