Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01941/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01941-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

JESSICA A. DAYTON (State Bar No. 231698)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JAREK MOLSKI 

and DISABILITY RIGHTS 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION 

SERVICES: HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK MOLSKI an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION

SERVICES:HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TORO PETROLEUM; PDP

INVESTMENTS, INC., a California

corporation; PETE PEREZ, JR., an

individual; and TORO PETROLEUM

CORP., a California corporation, dba

GONZALES UNOCAL 76, 

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 04-1941 RS

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own costs

and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction

over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375

(1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement

agreements).

Case 5:04-cv-01941-JF Document 24 Filed 09/13/2005 Page 1 of 2

**E-filed 9/20/05**

----------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON -2-

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

DATED: May 17, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: _______/s/__________________________

Jessica A. Dayton

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI 

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS

DATED: May 17, 2005 PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

By: _________/s/________________________

Jennifer E. Duggan

Attorneys for Defendant TORO PETROLEUM

CORP.

DATED: May 17, 2005 DE VRIES LAW GROUP

By: _________/s/________________________

Daniel J. DeVries

Attorneys for PDP INVESTMENTS, INC.

Case 5:04-cv-01941-JF Document 24 Filed 09/13/2005 Page 2 of 2

IT IS SO ORDERED 9/20/05

Jeremy Fogel/s/electronic signature authorized

United States District Court