Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07612/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-07612-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1 Douglas A. Prutton, Esq.

State Bar No. 118300

LAW OFFICES OF DOUGLAS A. PRUTTON

1985 Bonifacio Street, Suite 101

Concord, CA 94520

Ph: (925) 677-5080

Fax: (925) 677-5089

Attorney for Plaintiff

PHILLIP MORILLAS

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 OAKLAND DIVISION

11

12

CASE NO. 3.-18-CV-07612-CRB 13 PHILLIP MORILLAS

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

14 Plaintiff,

15

16 vs.

17

ELAVON, INC, and DOES 1-50, 18

19

Defendants. 20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STHP1LATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSEDj ORDER

3:18-CV-07612-CRB

Case 3:18-cv-07612-CRB Document 20 Filed 09/03/19 Page 1 of 3
1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Phillip Morillas filed his complaint in state court on February 1,

2 2018, which defendant removed to this Court on or about December 19, 2018;

3

WHEREAS, plaintiff and defendants settled this matter on or about July 12, 2019;

4

5

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Phillip Morillas

6

and defendants through their designated counsel that the above captioned action should be

dismissed with prejudice as to all ofthe named and Doe defendants pursuant to FRCP

41(a)(1)(A). The parties further stipulate that the parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees,

expenses and costs.

7

8

9

10

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11

12

13 Dated: July 15, 2019 LAW OFFICES OF DOUGLAS A. PRUTTON

14

15 7Z

Donbas A Prutton

Attorijey/fW Plaintiff Phillip Morillas

16

17

18

19 Dated: j3o,2t>iq ) SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP

20

21

Minal Haymond # j

Attorney for Defendant Elavon Inc.

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STllPtLATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

3:18-CV-07612-CRB

Case 3:18-cv-07612-CRB Document 20 Filed 09/03/19 Page 2 of 3
1 The Court having considered the stipulation ofthe parties, and good cause appearing

2 therefore, orders as follows:

3

1. The action is dismissed with prejudice as against all named and DOE defendants

4

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A).

5

2. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 6

7

8

Dated: 9

Honorable Judge Charles R. Breyer

United States Judge

Northern District ofCalifornia

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ST11PILATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

3:I8-CV-076I2-CRB

September 3, 2019

Case 3:18-cv-07612-CRB Document 20 Filed 09/03/19 Page 3 of 3