Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00326/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00326-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case Number C 10-00326 JF (PVT)

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND PRO SE FEES.

(JFLC1)

**E-Filed 6/28/2010**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MARK S. BUZA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, 

 Defendant.

Case Number C 10-00326 JF (PVT)

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND

PRO SE FEES.

[re: docket nos. 10, 16]

On January 25, 2010, Plaintiff Mark S. Buza (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against

Defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation alleging the following claims

for relief: a violation of Plaintiff’s Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights, pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983; conspiracy to interfere with Plaintiff’s constitutional rights, pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1985; neglecting to prevent the violation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights, pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1986; conspiracy against Plaintiff’s constitutional rights; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §

241; deprivation of rights under color of law, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 242; and frauds and

swindles, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1341.

On April 16, 2010, Plaintiff moved for entry of default and set the motion for hearing on

July 2, 2010. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), a motion for entry of default should be directed

Case 5:10-cv-00326-LHK Document 17 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 A motion for “pro se fees” is not supported by legal authority. 

1

2

Case Number C 10-00326 JF (PVT)

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND PRO SE FEES.

(JFLC1)

to the Clerk of the Court. If and when the Clerk enters default, Plaintiff then may move for

default judgment. Accordingly, the hearing on the instant motion is VACATED, and the motion

for entry of default is referred to the Clerk of the Court. The motion for “pro se fees” that

appears to depend on the motion for entry of default is TERMINATED without prejudice. A1

case management conference is hereby scheduled for August 27, 2010 at 10:30 A.M. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 28, 2010

_____________________________ 

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00326-LHK Document 17 Filed 06/28/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case Number C 10-00326 JF (PVT)

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND PRO SE FEES.

(JFLC1)

This Order has been served upon the following persons:

Mark S Buza

1060 Howard Street

San Francisco, CA 94103

Case 5:10-cv-00326-LHK Document 17 Filed 06/28/10 Page 3 of 3