Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03006/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-03006-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BERNARDOS GRAY, JR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T. VIRGA, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:12-cv-03006 KJM AC P 

ORDER 

On April 1, 2015, the court issued an order that partially granted plaintiff’s motion to 

compel. ECF No. 73. The court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by 

the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which 

requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. A 

review of the docket in this case shows that plaintiff recently filed an opposition to defendants’ 

motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 75), and that the address on his opposition is not the 

same as his address of record. The Clerk of the Court will be directed to re-serve the April 1, 

2015 order on plaintiff at the address indicated on his opposition and plaintiff will be required to 

file a notice of change of address. Failure to file a notice of change of address and keep the court 

informed of any future address changes will result in a recommendation that the case be 

dismissed. 

//// 

Case 2:12-cv-03006-KJM-AC Document 76 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Additionally, the April 1, 2015 order extended plaintiff’s time to file an opposition to the 

defendants’ summary-judgment motion due to the additional discovery responses that were 

ordered. ECF No. 73. In the event plaintiff filed his opposition before he received the court’s 

order, he was given leave to file a supplemental response. Id. Since it appears that plaintiff did 

not receive the order, he shall be permitted to file a supplemental opposition to defendants’ 

motion for summary judgment within thirty days of the service of defendants’ supplemental 

discovery responses. Defendants’ time to file their reply will not begin to run until plaintiff either 

files his supplemental opposition or his time for doing so expires. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-serve the court’s April 1, 2015 order (ECF No. 

73) on plaintiff at CSP-Sacramento, P.O. Box 290066, Represa, CA 95671. 

 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on plaintiff at both his address of 

record and at CSP-Sacramento, P.O. Box 290066, Represa, CA 95671. 

 3. Plaintiff must file a notice of change of address within fourteen days of the date of this 

order. 

 4. Plaintiff may file a supplemental opposition to the defendants’ motion for summary 

judgment within thirty days of service of defendants’ supplemental discovery responses. 

 5. Defendants’ time to file a reply in support of their motion for summary judgment will 

not begin to run until plaintiff either files his supplemental opposition or his time for doing so 

expires, whichever occurs first. Defendants shall have fourteen days to file a reply. 

DATED: April 29, 2015 

Case 2:12-cv-03006-KJM-AC Document 76 Filed 04/30/15 Page 2 of 2