Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-87-02144/USCOURTS-ca10-87-02144-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 

---

. ... FILED 

United States Co~rr of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 8 fS90 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ROBERT L. HOECKER 

GUS DANNY WILSON, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v. 

TED WALLMAN, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Clerk 

) No. 87-2144 

) (D.C. No. 87-804-W) 

) (W.D. Okla.) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

Petitioner appeals from an order of the district court 

denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 

28 u.s.c. § 2254. 

Petitioner was convicted after a jury trial of robbery with 

firearms after former conviction of a felony and was sentenced to 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 87-2144 Document: 01019962990 Date Filed: 02/08/1990 Page: 1 
• 

ninety-nine years' imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed on 

direct appeal. 

1976). 

Wilson v. State, 554 P.2d 806 (Okla. Crim. App. 

In his petition, petitioner alleged that he was denied 

effective assistance of counsel on appeal because counsel did not 

raise the issue that the prosecutor had been his public defender 

in his prior criminal cases in which he pled guilty. He also 

alleged that the state trial court erred in admitting 

identification testimony that was tainted by a pretrial lineup and 

that the prosecutor's "repeated" reference to hearsay evidence 

resulted in a denial of due process. The state conceded that 

petitioner had exhausted his state remedies. 

For substantially the reasons set forth in its memorandum 

opinion entered July 22, 1987, the judgment of the United States 

District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 87-2144 Document: 01019962990 Date Filed: 02/08/1990 Page: 2