Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04338/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04338-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

(CASE NO. 3:07-CV-04338-CRB) 

OHS West:260326329.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JEFFREY A. MILLER (CSB No.160,602) 

(jmiller@orrick.com) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 614-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UPEK, INC. 

STEVEN LIEBERMAN 

(slieberman@rothwellfigg.com) 

MINAKSI BHATT (CSB No. 151,312) 

(mbhatt@rothwellfigg.com) 

ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK 

1425 K Street, N.W. 

Suite 800 

Washington, DC 20005 

Telephone: (202) 783-6040 

Facsimile: (202) 783-6031 

Attorneys for Defendants 

IDEX ASA and 

IDEX AMERICA, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Civil Action No. 3:07-cv-04338-CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

WHEREAS on October 24, 2007, the parties reached a settlement to resolve this action. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties and 

through their respective counsel of record, subject to the Court’s approval, that: 

1. Each Parties' claims against the other are dismissed with prejudice; and 

UPEK, INC., 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

 

IDEX ASA, IDEX AMERICA INC., and 

STIFTELSEN FOR INDUDSTRIELL 

OG TEKNISK FORSKNING VED NTH, 

 

 Defendants. 

 

Case 3:07-cv-04338-CRB Document 17 Filed 10/31/07 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

 (CASE NO. 3:07-CV-04338-CRB) 

- 2 - 

OHS West:260326329.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: October 29, 2007

JEFFREY A. MILLER 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

_______________/s/_____________________

Attorneys for Plaintiff UPEK, Inc. 

Dated: October 29, 2007

STEVEN LIEBERMAN 

MINAKSI BHATT 

ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK 

________________/s/____________________

Attorneys for Defendants IDEX ASA and IDEX 

AMERICA, INC 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: ___________________ ____________________________________

Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Court Judge 

October 30, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:07-cv-04338-CRB Document 17 Filed 10/31/07 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

 (CASE NO. 3:07-CV-04338-CRB) 

- 3 - 

OHS West:260326329.1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ATTESTATION 

 I, Jeffrey A. Miller, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file 

Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., 

I hereby attest that Minaksi Bhatt has read and approved this stipulation and proposed order. I will 

maintain an executed copy of this stipulation in our files that can be made available for inspection 

upon request. 

 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

Dated: October 29, 2007 By: s/ Jeffrey A. Miller 

 Jeffrey A. Miller 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff UPEK, Inc. 

Case 3:07-cv-04338-CRB Document 17 Filed 10/31/07 Page 3 of 3