Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01738/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01738-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On May 19, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action. (Doc. 24) The 

parties rely upon Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which “the plaintiff may 

dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party 

serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once the 

notice is filed, no further action by the Court is required. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of 

San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this 

action in light of the voluntary dismissal with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JAMIE GOINS, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01738 DAD JLT 

ORDER CLOSING MATTER

(Doc. 21)

Case 1:15-cv-01738-DAD-JLT Document 25 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 1