Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06716/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06716-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TROY ALEXANDER TEMPLE, ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

CARL V. ADAMS, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

)

) 

No. CV-F-04-6716 REC DLB

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

TO RESUBMIT MATERIALS IN

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO

DISMISS.

On April 13, 2006, Defendants Sutter County, Yuba City, Carl

V. Adams, Frederick A. Schroeder, and Jeffrey W. Webster filed an

ex parte application for an extension of time to file certain

responsive documents. In that document, Defendants indicated

that they had received certain documents from Plaintiffpostmarked

April 7, 2006, including:

• Motion in Opposition to Sutter County Defendants Motion to

Dismiss and Summary Judgment (missing page 15);

• Motion to Allow for Discovery Under Federal Rule 56(f);

• Motion to Take Judicial Notice pursuant to Federal Rules of

Evidence Rule 201(b);

Case 1:04-cv-06716-LJO -DLB Document 87 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

• Rules 901 and 902 for Purposes of Opposing Defendants Motion

for Summary Judgment;

• Declaration of Troy A. Temple.

It appears that the Clerk of this Court has not received

copies of any of these documents.

ACCORDINGLY, 

1. As soon as possible, and no later than May 12, 2006,

Plaintiff shall serve on Defendants a complete copy of the

“Motion in Opposition to Sutter County Defendants Motion to

Dismiss and Summary Judgment,” including the missing page 15

or an explanation for the irregular numbering. 

2. As soon as possible, and no later than May 12, 2006,

Plaintiff shall file with this Court a complete copy of all

materials he mailed to Defendants on or around April 7,

2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

810ha4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06716-LJO -DLB Document 87 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 2