Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07347/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07347-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7347

ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

TIMOTHY JOSEPH SULLIVAN; LIAM O’GRADY, U.S. District Court 

Judge; ROGER W. TITUS, U.S. District Court Judge,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (8:14-cv-00500-FPS)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7347 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Matthews appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his complaint and amended complaint filed 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Bivens v. Six Unknown 

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

and denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.* We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Matthews v. Sullivan, No. 8:14-cv-00500-FPS (D. Md. May 23 & 

Aug. 13, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * In his motion for reconsideration and on appeal, Matthews 

asserts that the court should have considered some of his claims 

as common law professional malpractice, negligence, and gross 

negligence claims.

Appeal: 14-7347 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 2