Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-2_11-cv-03577/USCOURTS-alnd-2_11-cv-03577-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALABAMA AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, 

INC., ALABAMA AIRCRAFT 

INDUSTRIES, INC. – BIRMINGHAM, AND 

PEMCO AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING 

SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE BOEING COMPANY,

BOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS, 

INC. AND BOEING AEROSPACE 

SUPPORT CENTER, 

DEFENDANTS.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:11-cv-03577-RDP

ORDER

On February 9, 2016, the Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 

182) containing the recommendation that Boeing’s Motion to Compel Testimony on Topics 5, 

20, and 32 of Boeing’s Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice, which was filed with the Special Master 

on October 9, 2015, be granted. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Special Master’s Report and 

Recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the Reports of the Special Master. The court 

further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Special Master. It is therefore ORDERED that 

Boeing’s Motion to Compel Testimony on Topics 5, 20, and 32 of Boeing’s Rule 30(b)(6) 

Deposition Notice is GRANTED. AAI SHALL provide corporate testimony in the manner 

proposed in Boeing’s Notice (Topic 32) and July 21, 2015 letter (Topics 5 and 20).

FILED

 2016 Mar-16 PM 01:47

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 2:11-cv-03577-RDP Document 199 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED this March 16, 2016.

_________________________________

R. DAVID PROCTOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cv-03577-RDP Document 199 Filed 03/16/16 Page 2 of 2