Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-00281/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-00281-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMANDA STEVENS,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANDREW SAUL,

Defendant.

Case No. 20-cv-00281-JCS 

ORDER FOR PARTIES TO MEET AND 

CONFER RE: STATEMENT OF 

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

As set forth in the Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions, social security 

matters are deemed submitted for decision without oral argument based on the parties’ motions for 

summary judgment and/or remand. However, if after reviewing the record in the case the Court 

finds that a hearing is required, it may at a later date set a hearing on the parties’ summary 

judgment motions. In addition, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 56-2, the undersigned ORDERS

that the parties shall file either a joint statement or separate statements of the Administrative 

Record, summarizing the relevant: (1) procedural history of the case; (2) testimonial evidence 

from the hearing(s) before the Administrative Law Judge; and (3) medical evidence of record. 

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer within 21 days of service of 

Defendant’s answer to determine whether they are able to file a joint statement of the 

Administrative Record or whether it is necessary for the parties to file separate statements.

A. Joint Statement of the Administrative Record

If the parties agree on a joint statement of the Administrative Record, the statement shall 

be signed by both parties and filed by the same deadline as Plaintiff’s motion for summary 

judgment. Each fact must be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and cite to a specific 

portion of the Administrative Record where the fact finds support. The statement shall include 

separate headings for each of the three areas listed above, but the numbering for all three sections 

shall be continuous. 

Case 3:20-cv-00281-JCS Document 9 Filed 01/15/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

B. Separate Statements of the Administrative Record

If the parties are unable to agree on a joint statement, they shall comply with the following 

requirements.

1. Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of the Administrative Record 

At the time Plaintiff files the motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff must also file a 

statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting forth each fact from the 

Administrative Record on which Plaintiff relies in support of the motion. Each fact must be set 

forth in a separately numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative 

Record where the fact finds support. The statement shall include separate headings for each of the 

three areas listed above, but the numbering for all three sections shall be continuous. 

2. Defendant’s Separate Statement of the Administrative Record 

At the time Defendant files the opposition or counter-motion to Plaintiff’s motion, 

Defendant must also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting 

forth: (a) for each paragraph of Plaintiff’s separate statement, a correspondingly numbered 

paragraph indicating whether Defendant disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Plaintiff and, 

if disputed, a reference to the specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting 

Defendant’s position; and (b) any additional facts from the Administrative Record on which 

Defendant relies in support of the motion. Each additional fact must be set forth in a separately 

numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where the fact 

finds support.

3. Reply Statement of Facts 

If Defendant sets forth additional facts in the opposition/counter-motion, Plaintiff shall file 

a statement, separate from the reply brief, with correspondingly numbered paragraphs indicating 

whether Plaintiff disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Defendant and, if disputed, a 

reference to the specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting Plaintiff’s position. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 15, 2020 ______________________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

Chief Magistrate Judge

Case 3:20-cv-00281-JCS Document 9 Filed 01/15/20 Page 2 of 2