Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01656/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01656-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CRYSTAL ARCIOSA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARAMARK RAIL SERVICES, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-01656-BLF 

ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES 

AND VACATING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

[Re: ECF 21]

On September 15, 2015, the Court issued an order to show cause why the above-captioned 

case should not be remanded back to Santa Clara County Superior Court for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction. ECF 20. The order required Defendant Aramark Rail Services, LLC (“Aramark”) to 

file a response by September 25, 2015 and Plaintiff to file a response by October 5, 2015. Id. On

September 24, 2015, Plaintiff and Defendant Aramark filed a notice of settlement. ECF 21.

Accordingly, the Court CONTINIUES by forty-five days the briefing dates set forth in the 

Court’s order to show cause. Defendant Aramark’s response to the order to show cause shall be 

due by November 9, 2015 and Plaintiff’s response shall be due by November 19, 2015. Finally, 

the Court VACATES the case management conference scheduled for November 19, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 28, 2015

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-01656-BLF Document 22 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 1