Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-01399/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-01399-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-01399 EJD

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ALBERT RUDGAYZER,

Plaintiff(s),

 v.

 YAHOO!, INC.,

Defendant(s). /

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-01399 EJD

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

On December 12, 2012, the court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing by December 31,

2012, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute after Plaintiff failed to file an

amended complaint. See Docket Item No. 37. The court advised Plaintiff that this case would be

dismissed if he did not respond or otherwise demonstrate good cause why this case should not be

dismissed. Id. 

On December 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed a return indicating that he would not be filing an

amended complaint. See Docket Item No. 40. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk shall close this file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2013 

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:12-cv-01399-EJD Document 41 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 1