Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-01699/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-01699-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:185 Employee Pension Plan

---

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ZOOM ELECTRIC, INC., a 

California corporation, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF 

ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 

595, a labor organization, 

and DOES 1-20, 

Respondents. 

Case No. 4:11-cv-01699-CW

 

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE 

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF 

ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 

595, a labor organization, 

Counter-Plaintiff. 

v. 

ZOOM ELECTRIC, INC., a 

California corporation; VEIKO 

HORAK, individually and as 

the alter-ego of ZOOM 

ELECTRIC, a sole 

proprietorship; and DOES ONE 

through TEN, inclusive, 

Counter-Defendants.

On October 19, 2011, the Court granted in part Respondent and 

Counter-Plaintiff International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 

(IBEW) Local 595’s Motion to continue the briefing schedule for 

dispositive motions, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-3 and for good cause 

shown. At that time, the Court set a briefing and hearing 

schedule based on the understanding that IBEW’s deposition of 

Petitioner and Counter-Defendant Zoom Electric, Inc. (ZEI) and 

Counter-Defendant Veiko Horak had taken place on October 17, 2011. 

Case 4:11-cv-01699-CW Document 61 Filed 11/08/11 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The Court also directed the parties to inform the Court if the 

deposition did not take place on October 17, 2011 and to submit a 

joint proposed briefing and hearing calendar. 

The parties have now represented to the Court that the 

deposition did not take place on October 17, 2011, and that it is 

now scheduled to occur on November 17, 2011. The parties have 

each filed a separate proposed motion calendar. Subsequent to 

these filings, on November 8, 2011, ZEI and Horak filed a motion 

to dismiss the Union’s First Amended Counter-Complaint (Docket No. 

60). 

Having considered the proposals of both parties, the Court 

orders the briefing and hearing calendar on all dispositive 

motions to be set as follows: 

Union’s Opposition to Motions to Vacate 

and Dismiss; Cross-Motion to Confirm 

and Enforce; Motion for Summary 

Judgment on Union’s Second Cause of 

Action (All contained within a single 

twenty-five-page brief) 

December 8, 2011 

ZEI and Horak’s Reply to Opposition to 

Motions to Vacate and Dismiss; 

Opposition to Cross-Motion to Confirm 

and Enforce; Opposition to Motion for 

Summary Judgment (All contained within 

a single fifteen-page brief) 

December 22, 2011 

Union’s Reply to Opposition to CrossMotion to Confirm and Enforce; Reply to 

Opposition to Motion for Summary 

Judgment (All contained within a single 

fifteen-page brief) 

December 29, 2011 

Hearing on all Dispositive Motions; 

Case Management Conference 

January 19, 2012, 

at 2:00 p.m. 

Case 4:11-cv-01699-CW Document 61 Filed 11/08/11 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

 3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The mediation date is maintained as currently set. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________ ______________________________ 

CLAUDIA WILKEN 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:11-cv-01699-CW Document 61 Filed 11/08/11 Page 3 of 3