Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05610/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05610-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 On December 27, 2005, the United States Postal Service returned the Findings and Recommendations as

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicates that plaintiff is out to court. However, plaintiff has not notified

the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. Local

Rule 83-182(f). 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAROLD TIDWELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. C. I. - CHIEF MEDICAL

OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:04-CV-5610-AWI-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(Doc. 47) 

Plaintiff Harold Tidwell (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On December 13, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein

which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party filed objections.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

Case 1:04-cv-05610-AWI-LJO Document 49 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 13, 2005, is adopted in full; 

2. This action is dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to prosecute; and

3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for defendant and against plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05610-AWI-LJO Document 49 Filed 01/11/06 Page 2 of 2