Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06169/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06169-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 140
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E&M TRUST,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ABN AMRO BANK, N.A., et al.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C07-6169 BZ

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

Before the court is the motion of defendants Soter and

Rossi to dismiss the complaint for a variety of reasons or in

the alternative for a more definite statement and plaintiff’s

ex parte application to enlarge time to respond to defendants’

motions. The court finds no need for argument. 

Inasmuch as the complaint was filed pro se and

plaintiff’s counsel has recently been retained, IT IS ORDERED

as follows:

1. Defendants’ Motion For More Definite Statement is

GRANTED. By no later than March 20, 2008, plaintiff shall

file an amended complaint which addresses the issues raised in

the defendants’ motion, especially whether there is federal

Case 3:07-cv-06169-BZ Document 31 Filed 02/27/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

jurisdiction.

2. Defendant’s response to the amended complaint shall

be filed no later than April 7, 2008.

3. The other motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

Dated: February 27, 2008

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\E&M TRUST\ORDER.wpd

Case 3:07-cv-06169-BZ Document 31 Filed 02/27/08 Page 2 of 2