Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03153/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03153-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

574559.1 - 1 - STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL 

PRODUCTION OF STATISTICAL DATA

CASE NO. 06-3153 CW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

JUANITA WYNNE and DANTE BYRD, 

on behalf of themselves and classes of 

those similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MCCORMICK & SCHMICK’S 

SEAFOOD RESTAURANTS, INC. and 

MCCORMICK & SCHMICK 

RESTAURANT CORP.,

Defendants.

Case No. 06-3153 CW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF 

STATISTICAL DATA

Case 4:06-cv-03153-CW Document 34 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 1 of 3 Case 4:06-cv-03153-CW Document 36 Filed 11/06/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

574559.1 -2- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL 

PRODUCTION OF STATISTICAL DATA

CASE NO. 06-3153 CW

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Juanita Wynne and Dante Byrd

(“Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, and McCormick & Schmick’s Seafood 

Restaurants, Inc. and McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp. (“Defendant”), by and through 

their undersigned counsel. Plaintiffs and Defendant are collectively referred to herein as the 

“Parties.”

RECITALS

WHEREAS, on October 3, 2006, Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel statistical 

data;

WHEREAS, on October 4, 2006, the motion was referred to the undersigned 

United States Magistrate Judge;

WHEREAS, on October 19, 2006, after having submitted letter briefs regarding 

the dispute in accordance with the applicable rules and standing order, the Parties participated in a 

telephonic conference with the Magistrate Judge in an effort to resolve the dispute;

WHEREAS, during that conference, the Magistrate Judge ordered the Parties to 

meet and confer in a further effort to resolve the dispute, and set forth the following briefing 

schedule in the event that a resolution could not be reached:

Friday, November 3, 2006 Plaintiffs to file documents in accordance with N.D. 

Cal. Local Rule 37-2

Monday, November 13, 2006 Defendant’s opposition brief due

Friday, November 17, 2006 Plaintiffs’ reply brief due

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

10:00 a.m.

Hearing before Magistrate Judge Zimmerman,

15th floor, courtroom G

WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred in person on October 24, 2006, at 

which time they discussed their positions, exchanged information, and considered a potential 

compromise; and

WHEREAS, the Parties have been unable to reach agreement on the proposed 

compromise, and the Parties agree that the dispute requires judicial resolution;

Case 4:06-cv-03153-CW Document 34 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 2 of 3 Case 4:06-cv-03153-CW Document 36 Filed 11/06/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

574559.1 -3- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL 

PRODUCTION OF STATISTICAL DATA

CASE NO. 06-3153 CW

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT

1. Plaintiffs may submit a revised motion to compel and accompanying 

documents reflecting the parties’ further discussion and exchange of information by November 3, 

2006 along with the Rule 37-2 documents due on the same date.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

DATED: November 3, 2006 Michael Gallion

Michael Gallion, Attorney for Defendant

DATED: November 3, 2006 Bill Lann Lee 

Bill Lann Lee, Attorney for Plaintiffs

ORDER

The foregoing Stipulation is approved, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________________, 2006 ________________________________________

Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Northern District of California 

Case 4:06-cv-03153-CW Document 34 Filed 11/03/2006 Page 3 of 3

November 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 4:06-cv-03153-CW Document 36 Filed 11/06/06 Page 3 of 3