Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00898/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00898-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BANK OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ANDA CAVANAGH, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:19-cv-0898 KJM DB PS 

ORDER 

 Defendant is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to 

a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

 On October 18, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and 

recommendations. The time for filing objections has expired, and no party has filed objections to 

the findings and recommendations. 

 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 

602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 

de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 

Case 2:19-cv-00898-KJM-DB Document 8 Filed 01/23/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 

. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 18, 2019 (ECF No. 7) are adopted in 

full; and 

 2. This action is summarily remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court. 

DATED: January 22, 2020. 

\bofa0898.jo 

Case 2:19-cv-00898-KJM-DB Document 8 Filed 01/23/20 Page 2 of 2