Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00429/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00429-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1180714 v2/SF 1. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME

 C10-CV-00429 (JF)

COOLEY LLP 

MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com) 

MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972) (brownmd@cooley.com) 

101 California Street 

5th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 

Telephone: (415) 693-2000 

Fax: (415) 693-2222 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FACEBOOK, INC. 

DAVID N. LAKE (180775) (David@lakelawpc.com) 

16130 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 650 

Encino, CA 91436 

Telephone: (818) 788-5100 

Fax: (818) 788-5199 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IN RE FACEBOOK CONSUMER

PRIVACY LITIGATION 

Case No. C10-cv-00429 (JF)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’

TIME TO FILE CONSOLIDATED

COMPLAINT, DEFENDANT’S TIME

TO ANSWER OR MOVE, AND

PARTIES’ TIME TO COMPLY WITH

THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE AND ADR

DEADLINES 

This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiffs Donald Silverstri, Dawn Keer, 

Kimberly Mancella, Jill Silverman Strelzin, Christopher LeMole, Eric Markowitz, Frank 

Bluementhal, Lauren Reese, and Billy Sternberg (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and defendant 

Facebook, Inc. (“Defendant”) by and through their respective counsel. 

**E-Filed 5/25/2010**

------------------

Case 5:10-cv-00429-JF Document 18 Filed 05/25/10 Page 1 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1180714 v2/SF 2. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME

 C10-CV-00429 (JF)

WHEREAS, the Silverstri complaint was filed on January 29, 2010; 

WHEREAS, the Markowitz complaint was filed on January 29, 2010; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant has duly accepted service of the Summonses and 

Complaints; 

WHEREAS, on February 4, 2010, the Parties stipulated: (a) that the Silverstri and 

Markowitz actions are related cases within the meaning of Local Civil Rule 3-12(a), (b) that under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), the cases are consolidated for all purposes into one action, 

(c) that Plaintiffs shall file a Consolidated Complaint on or before March 9, 2010, and (d) that 

Defendant shall respond to the Consolidated Complaint on or before April 9, 2010; 

WHEREAS, on February 11, 2010, the Court so ordered the Stipulation; 

WHEREAS, on March 5, 2010, the Parties stipulated that Plaintiffs shall file a 

Consolidated Complaint on or before April 27, 2010, and that Defendant shall respond to the 

Consolidated Complaint on or before May 27, 2010; 

WHEREAS, on March 15, 2010, the Court so ordered the Stipulation; 

WHEREAS, on April 21, 2010, the Parties stipulated that Plaintiffs shall file a 

Consolidated Complaint on or before May 25, 2010, that Defendant shall respond to the 

Consolidated Complaint on or before June 24, 2010, and that the Parties would respond to the 

Initial Case Management Order and ADR Order by May 28, 2010; 

WHEREAS, on April 29, 2010, the Court so ordered the Stipulation; 

WHEREAS, on April 29, 2010, the Court reset the Conference on the Initial Case 

Management Order from May 14, 2010 to May 28, 2010; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have been diligently working on the Consolidated Complaint but 

Laurence D. Paskowitz, the principal of one of the Co-Lead Counsel, recently had major surgery, 

is recovering at home and cannot yet work full time, and, accordingly, Plaintiffs require a short 

additional extension to complete the Consolidated Complaint; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs will not seek any further extensions of this deadline; 

 WHEREAS the Parties also have agreed upon a briefing schedule for Defendant’s 

anticipated Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, and, accordingly, seek to reset the dates pertaining 

Case 5:10-cv-00429-JF Document 18 Filed 05/25/10 Page 2 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1180714 v2/SF 3. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME

 C10-CV-00429 (JF)

to the Initial Case Management Order; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned 

counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendant, that: 

 1. The Plaintiffs shall file a superseding Consolidated Complaint on or before June 8, 

2010. Defendant shall move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the Consolidated 

Complaint on or before July 13, 2010. Defendant has no obligation to respond to the current 

Complaints. If Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs will file their Opposition to such 

Motion by August 10, 2010, and Defendant will file a Reply by August 27, 2010. 

 2. August 19, 2010 will be the last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early 

settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan (Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(f) & ADR L.R. 3-5); 

file ADR certification signed by Parties and Counsel (Civil L.R. 16-8(b) & ADR L.R. 3-5(b)); 

and file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (Civil 

L.R. 16-8(c) & ADR L.R. 3-5(b) & (c)). 

 3. September 2, 2010 will be the last day to file the Rule 26(f) Report, complete 

initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement per 

the Court’s Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case Management Statement (Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 

26(a)(1) & Civil L.R. 16-9). 

 4. Oral argument on any Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant shall be heard on 

September 10, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. and the Case Management Conference shall be held on the same 

day, September 10, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. 

This Stipulation is without prejudice to any other rights that any party may have. 

Case 5:10-cv-00429-JF Document 18 Filed 05/25/10 Page 3 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1180714 v2/SF 4. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME

 C10-CV-00429 (JF)

Dated: May 19, 2010 

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID N. LAKE

 /s/ David N. Lake 

David N. Lake (180775) 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs DONALD 

SILVERSTRI, DAWN KEER, 

KIMBERLY MANCELLA, JILL 

SILVERMAN STRELZIN, 

CHRISTOPHER LEMOLE, ERIC 

MARKOWITZ, FRANK 

BLUEMENTHAL, LAUREN REESE, 

AND BILLY STERNBERG 

COOLEY LLP

 /s/ Matthew D. Brown 

Matthew D. Brown (196972) 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FACEBOOK, INC. 

DAVID N. LAKE (180775) 

(David@lakelawpc.com) 

16130 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 650 

Encino, CA 91436 

Telephone: (818) 788-5100 

Fax: (818) 788-5199 

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs 

LAURENCE D. PASKOWITZ 

ROY L. JACOBS 

ANGELICA KONTOROFF 

PASKOWITZ LAW FIRM P.C. 

60 East 42nd Street, 46th Floor 

New York, NY 10165 

Telephone: (212) 685-0969 

Fax: (212) 685-2306 

Classattorney@aol.com 

 and 

Brian M. Felgoise 

FELGOISE LAW FIRM 

261 Old York Rd. 

Suite 518 

Jenkintown, PA 19046 

Telephone: (215) 886-1900 

Fax: (215) 886-1909 

Felgoiselaw@verizon.net 

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

COOLEY LLP

MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) 

(rhodesmg@cooley.com) 

MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972) 

(brownmd@cooley.com) 

101 California Street 

5th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 

Telephone: (415) 693-2000 

Fax: (415) 693-2222 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FACEBOOK, INC. 

Case 5:10-cv-00429-JF Document 18 Filed 05/25/10 Page 4 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1180714 v2/SF 5. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME

 C10-CV-00429 (JF)

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The above stipulation having been considered and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED:___________________ _________________________________________

 The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

___________ ------------------

5/25/2010

Case 5:10-cv-00429-JF Document 18 Filed 05/25/10 Page 5 of 6
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1180714 v2/SF 6. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME

 C10-CV-00429 (JF)

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests 

that all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order.

Dated: May 19, 2010 COOLEY LLP 

By: /s/ Matthew D. Brown 

Matthew D. Brown 

Case 5:10-cv-00429-JF Document 18 Filed 05/25/10 Page 6 of 6