Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01350/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01350-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES EDWARD BOWELL,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

A. DIAZ, et al., 

 Defendants.

Case No. 1:11-cv-01350-AWI-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AS 

SUPPLEMENTED FOR TEMPORARY 

INJUNCTION AND EMERGENCY 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

(ECF No. 19 & 25) 

CASE TO REMAIN OPEN

Plaintiff James Edward Bowell is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action filed August 15, 2011 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District 

of California.

On August 14, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations

that Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and emergency preliminary 

injunction (ECF No. 19) as supplemented (ECF Nos. 21, 22), be DENIED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. (ECF No. 25.) Any objection to the findings and recommendations was 

originally due by September 3, 2013. (Id.) Plaintiff requested and was granted an extension 

Case 1:11-cv-01350-AWI-MJS Document 30 Filed 10/02/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

to not later than September 13, 2013 by which to file objections. (ECF No. 27.) The 

September 13, 2013 deadline passed without Plaintiff filing objections or seeking further 

extension of time to do so.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court 

finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court adopts the findings and recommendations filed on August 14, 2013

(ECF No. 25) in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and emergency preliminary 

injunction (ECF No. 19) as supplemented (ECF Nos. 21, 22) is DENIED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 

3. This case shall remain open. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 1, 2013 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC _Signature- END:

0m8i788

 

1 On September 12, 2013, Plaintiff filed a document which lines out the caption “objections” and replaces with 

“motion for emergency injunctive relief.” (ECF No. 28.) Even if this document were construed as objections, 

the allegations therein are unrelated to the instant action and in any event fail to raise any issue of law or fact 

under the findings and recommendations.

Case 1:11-cv-01350-AWI-MJS Document 30 Filed 10/02/13 Page 2 of 2