Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00735/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00735-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

_____________________________________________________________________

Stipulation for Order Continuing Motion to Recuse

B.C. BARMANN, SR., COUNTY COUNSEL

COUNTY OF KERN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

By Mark L. Nations, Chief Deputy (Bar # 101838)

Administrative Center

1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor

Bakersfield, California 93301

Telephone: (661) 868-3800

Attorney for Defendants, 

COUNTY OF KERN, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOWARD WEIMER,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF KERN; KERN COUNTY

SHERIFF’S OFFICE; KERN COUNTY

WELFARE DEPARTMENT; EDWARD 

LAWRENCE KLEIER; BRADFORD

DARLING; JACK RUTLEDGE; 

EDWARD JAGELS; ANDREW GINDES;

CAROL DARLING; BARBARA JONES;

IRENE VALOS and DOES 1 - 30, 

Defendants

CASE NO. CV-F-06-00735 OWW-DLB

STIPULATION FOR ORDER

CONTINUING MOTION TO RECUSE

JUDGE OLIVER W. WANGER

SPECIAL NOTICE TO COUNSEL:

Date changed to October 16, 2006

Counsel for all parties, Patience Milrod, Esq., for plaintiff, Howard Weimer, and

Mark L. Nations, Chief Deputy County Counsel, for defendants County of Kern, Edward

Jagels, Edward Lawrence Kleier, Kern County Sheriff’s Department and Kern County

Welfare Department hereby stipulate that the Court may enter an order continuing the

Motion to Recuse Judge Oliver W. Wanger, presently scheduled for September 25, 2006,

to October 10, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, so that plaintiff’s counsel may attend

the hearing on this motion. The parties believe that it will be beneficial to all parties and

to the Court to postpone the motion. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to recuse would

be due on September 22, 2006 and defendants’ reply would be due on October 3, 2006.

Case 1:06-cv-00735-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

_____________________________________________________________________

Stipulation for Order Continuing Motion to Recuse

The parties herein agree that this stipulation may be signed in counterparts. 

Dated: August 24, 2006. B. C. BARMANN, SR., COUNTY COUNSEL

By /s/ Mark L. Nations 

 Mark L. Nations, Chief Deputy

 Attorney for Defendants County of Kern, et

 al.

Dated: August 24, 2006. LAW OFFICE OF PATIENCE MILROD

By /s/ Patience Milrod 

 Patience Milrod, Esq. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, Howard Weimer

ORDER

The Court having read the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Recuse in this matter currently scheduled for

September 25, 2006, is hereby continued until October 16, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. in

Courtroom 3 and plaintiff’s opposition to motion to recuse is due on September 22, 2006

and defendants’ reply is due on October 3, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 30, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00735-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 08/30/06 Page 2 of 2