Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04684/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04684-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

FOLGER LEVIN &

KAHN LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FILING OF SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; CASE NO. 04-04684 JCS 

FOLGER LEVIN & KAHN LLP

Douglas W. Sullivan (SB# 088136) 

Amy L. Kashiwabara (SB# 210562) 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 986-2800 

Facsimile: (415) 986-2827 

akashiwabara@flk.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Menlo Logistics, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MENLO LOGISTICS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation

Plaintiff, 

v.

WESTERN EXPRESS, INC., a Tennessee 

corporation

Defendant.

Case No. 04-04684 JCS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED 

ORDER] FOR FILING OF SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Trial Date: November 14, 2005 

 Time: 8:30 a.m. 

 Place: Courtroom A, 15th Floor 

 Hon. Joseph C. Spero 

Case 3:04-cv-04684-JCS Document 104-1 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:04-cv-04684-JCS Document 113 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 2
FOLGER LEVIN &

KAHN LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -2- STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FILING OF SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; CASE NO. 04-04684 JCS 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective 

attorneys of record that Plaintiff Menlo Logistics, Inc. may file a Second Amended Complaint, a 

copy of which is attached hereto.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Defendant Western Express, Inc. may file an 

Answer to the Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto. 

This stipulation is without waiver Plaintiff’s objection as raised in its Motion in Limine 

No. 1 (previously overruled by the Court) that Defendant should not be allowed to argue the 

defense of “impossibility” because Defendant did not raise the affirmative defense in its January 

12, 2005 Answer and Counterclaim or its June 29, 2005 Answer to Amended Complaint. 

Dated: November 11, 2005 FOLGER LEVIN & KAHN LLP

_________/s/___________

Amy L. Kashiwabara 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Menlo Logistics, Inc. 

Dated: November 11, 2005 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

_________/s/___________

John P. Walovich 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Western Express, Inc. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: November __, 2005 _______________________________________ Hon. Joseph C. Spero 

65021\2008\467542.1

Case 3:04-cv-04684-JCS Document 104-1 Filed 11/11/2005 Page 2 of 2

14

Case 3:04-cv-04684-JCS Document 113 Filed 11/14/05 Page 2 of 2