Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01314/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01314-109/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:206 Collect Unpaid Wages

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE TACO BELL WAGE AND HOUR 

ACTIONS

Case No. 1:07-cv-01314-SAB

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF 

NARANJO TO FILE A STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL

(ECF No. 699)

On December 31, 2015, Plaintiff Loraine Naranjo filed a notice of settlement of her 

individual claims in this action. (ECF No. 581.) An order issued requiring Plaintiff to file 

dispositional documents within thirty days. (ECF No. 582.) After receiving several extensions 

of time, on March 10, 2016, Plaintiff filed a declaration requesting that her claims in this action 

be dismissed with prejudice. 

Plaintiff is advised that Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides 

that, after a party answers, the plaintiff may dismiss an action by a stipulation of dismissal signed 

by all parties who have appeared. Generally, when the parties have reached a settlement, the 

action is dismissed by stipulation.

However, Rule 41(a)(2) provides that an action may be dismissed by court order on terms 

that the Court considers proper. In this instance, counsel has filed a declaration stating that the 

parties have reached a settlement agreement on Plaintiff Naranjo’s individual claims; and she has 

Case 1:07-cv-01314-SAB Document 704 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

agreed to dismiss those claims with prejudice. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff 

Naranjo’s individual claims in this action should be dismissed.

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff Loraine Naranjo’s individual claims in this action are 

HEREBY ORDERED DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 11, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01314-SAB Document 704 Filed 03/11/16 Page 2 of 2