Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00464/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00464-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

ANDREWS FARMS v. CALCOT, LTD., et al.

K:\LJO\To_Be_Signed\07cv0464.briefing.wpd/ld [PROPOSED] ORDER

ROBERT M. DOWD, #70685

KRISTINE M. HOWE, #207235

MICHAEL R. JOHNSON, #237767

GRISWOLD, LASALLE, COBB, DOWD & GIN, L.L.P.

311 North Douty Street

Hanford, CA 93230

(559) 584-6656; (559) 582-3106 (Facsimile)

dowd@griswoldlasalle.com; howe@griswoldlasalle.com; johnson@griswoldlasalle.com

STEPHEN T. CLIFFORD, #39020

T. MARK SMITH, #162370

CLIFFORD & BROWN

1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 900

Bakersfield, CA 93301-5230

(661) 322-6023; (661) 322-3508 (Facsimile)

sclifford@clifford-brownlaw.com; msmith@clifford-brownlaw.com

Attorneys for: Defendant, CALCOT, LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREWS FARMS, a California

partnership; and, GREG PALLA, a sole

proprietor and doing business as GREG

PALLA FARMING COMPANY,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CALCOT, LTD; EADIE AND PAYNE,

LLP; and DOES 1-50,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:07-cv-00464-LJO-DLB

ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR

DEFENDANT CALCOT, LTD’S MOTION

TO DISMISS

After reading and considering Defendant, Calcot, Ltd’s (CALCOT) Ex Parte Application for

Order Extending Page Limit (“Application”), and the evidence presented in support thereof, it is

satisfactorily appearing to the Court that CALCOT cannot make a complete argument without

additional pages. 

Case 1:07-cv-00464-LJO -JLT Document 38 Filed 08/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

ANDREWS FARMS v. CALCOT, LTD., et al.

K:\LJO\To_Be_Signed\07cv0464.briefing.wpd/ld [PROPOSED] ORDER

This Court EXTENDS the page limit for CALCOT’s Motion to Dismiss by ten pages on the

condition that Calcot’s papers are well-organized, succinct, focused and not unduly repetitive.

The Motion to Dismiss will not exceed thirty-five (35) pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 14, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00464-LJO -JLT Document 38 Filed 08/14/07 Page 2 of 2