Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03570/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03570-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 CASE NO. 13 CIV. 3570-RS 

STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ON LOPEZ MOTION TO DISMISS, [PROPOSED] ORDER

Edward S. Zusman (SBN 154366) 

ezusman@mzclaw.com 

Kevin K. Eng (SBN 209036) 

keng@mzclaw.com 

MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP 

465 California Street, 5th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 438-4515 

Facsimile: (415) 434-4505 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

STEVEN SIEGAL, JAMES RYBICKI, DAVID 

GROBLEBE, individually and as General Partner 

of GROBCO II, and CHRISTIAN WIPF, ON 

BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL 

INDIVIDUALS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

G. THOMAS GAMBLE, LOREN J. MILLER, 

HENRY LOWENSTEIN, PAUL W. BATEMAN, 

EDWARD M. GABRIEL, JAMES S. MAYER, 

BEHROOZ SARAFRAZ, LYNN BLYSTONE, 

ALFRED LOPEZ, MASTON CUNNINGHAM, 

JOHN DURBIN, GREG BILLINGER, K&L 

GATES LLP, CHARLES A. DALE III, JOSHUA 

LANE, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, 

INCLUSIVE,

Defendants. 

Case No. 13 Civ. 3570-RS 

STIPULATION TO MODIFY 

SCHEDULING ON DR. ALFRED 

LOPEZ’S MOTION TO DISMISS; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 

 WHEREAS, on October 5, 2015, Defendant Alfred Lopez filed a Motion To Dismiss the 

Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 126); 

 WHEREAS, the hearing for Defendant’s Motion was set for November 19, 2015, at 1:30 

p.m.; 

/// 

Case 3:13-cv-03570-RS Document 138 Filed 10/19/15 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 CASE NO. 13 CIV. 3570-RS 

STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ON LOPEZ MOTION TO DISMISS, [PROPOSED] ORDER

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel has a conflict with the November 19, 2015 hearing date; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel has a number of preexisting deadlines during the week of 

October 19, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendant’s Motion is currently due October 19, 

2015; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs request a two-week extension to prepare and file oppositions to the 

Defendant’s Motion; 

 WHEREAS, Defendant has granted Plaintiffs’ request for an extension; and 

 WHEREAS, Defendant believes it is appropriate for his Motion to be decided before a 

renewed motion for preliminary approval of settlement; 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between 

Plaintiffs and Defendant Lopez, subject to the approval of the Court, that: 

 (1) The hearing on Defendant’s Motion shall be continued to January 14, 2016; 

 (2) Opposition papers to the Motion shall be filed on or before November 4, 2015; 

 (3) Reply papers in support of the Motion shall be filed on or before November 18, 

2015; 

 (4) Plaintiffs’ renewed Motion For Preliminary Approval of Settlement (“Preliminary 

Approval Motion”), shall be set for hearing no earlier than February 18, 2016, or after the 

Defendant’s Motion has been decided, whichever date is later. 

Dated: October 16, 2015 MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON 

LLP 

By /s/ Kevin K. Eng 

 Edward S. Zusman 

 Kevin K. Eng 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Dated: October 16, 2015 MURPHY COOKE KOBRICK LLP 

By /s/ Christopher Cooke 

 Christopher Cooke 

Attorneys for Defendant Dr. Alfred Lopez 

Case 3:13-cv-03570-RS Document 138 Filed 10/19/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 CASE NO. 13 CIV. 3570-RS 

STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ON LOPEZ MOTION TO DISMISS, [PROPOSED] ORDER

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and pursuant to Rule 7-11 of the Civil Local Rules, the 

Court hereby adopts and approves the terms of the parties’ stipulation set forth above, and orders 

that: 

 (1) The hearing on Defendant’s Motion (Dkt. No. 126) shall be continued to January 

14, 2016, 1:30 p.m.; 

 (2) Opposition papers to the Motion shall be filed on or before November 4, 2015; 

 (3) Reply papers in support of the Motion shall be filed on or before November 18, 

2015; 

 (4) Plaintiffs’ renewed Motion For Preliminary Approval of Settlement (“Preliminary 

Approval Motion”), shall be set for hearing no earlier than February 18, 2016, or after the Motion 

has been decided, whichever date is later. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________ __________________________________ 

 The Honorable Richard Seeborg 

 United States District Judge 

10/19/15

Case 3:13-cv-03570-RS Document 138 Filed 10/19/15 Page 3 of 3