Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01686/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01686-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OCULUS INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

NOFIL CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-01686 SI

ORDER AWARDING DAMAGES TO

PLAINTIFF

By order issued November 15, 2007, this Court granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff

Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc. The motion was uncontested. The Court held that plaintiff was

entitled to summary judgment on its claim for defendants’ breach of a non-disclosure agreement and

exclusive purchase agreement. In so holding, the Court found that plaintiff had suffered some damage

as a result of the breach, but declined to find on the record before it the amount of damages to which

plaintiff was entitled. On January 22, 2008, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on this question. 

After considering the evidence submitted, the Court finds that plaintiff has proved to the Court’s

satisfaction that plaintiff has suffered $916,206 in lost profits for fiscal year 2006 through part of fiscal

year 2008. The Court also finds that plaintiff has proved to the Court’s satisfaction that plaintiff will

suffer future lost profits of $5,727,829 for the next five and a half fiscal years, discounted to present

value. The Court does not accept plaintiff’s capitalized loss analysis, and thus declines to find an

additional loss of $12,586,359 for years beyond fiscal year 2013. In sum, the Court hereby GRANTS

///

Case 3:06-cv-01686-SI Document 92 Filed 01/23/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IN PART and DENIES IN PART plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to damages [Docket No.

70]. Defendants are ordered to pay plaintiff $6,644,035 in damages for lost profits as a result of the

breach.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 23, 2008 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01686-SI Document 92 Filed 01/23/08 Page 2 of 2