Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02424/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-02424-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL C. GARCIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SANTA CLARA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 10-cv-02424-SI 

ORDER RE: RESPONSIVE BRIEFING 

ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO SEEK RECONSIDERATION 

OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 145

On September 9, 2015, the Court granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment in 

part. Dkt. No. 116. Plaintiff, who has been incarcerated during much of this case, opposed the 

motion pro se from Salinas Valley State Prison. Dkt. No. 112. On July 13, 2016, the Court 

entered an order appointing counsel for Plaintiff. Plaintiff now seeks leave to file a Motion for 

Reconsideration of Summary Judgment under Civil Local Rule 7-9. See Dkt. No. 145.

Under Civil Local Rule 7-9, neither responsive briefing nor a hearing is required on a 

motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration. Civil L.R. 7-9(d). The Court may, however, 

choose to order briefing or set a hearing. Id. 

Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Seek Reconsideration, 

not to exceed ten pages, setting forth reasons why reconsideration of summary judgment is 

inappropriate in this case. Defendants’ response must be filed no later than October 28, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 19, 2016

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-02424-SI Document 148 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 1