Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01605/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01605-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERNEST MILLER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1605 GEB DAD P

vs.

B. STOWELL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On July 22, 2010, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Notice of Motion Objections

By Plaintiff,” which the court construes as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s

order filed July 8, 2010. In that order, the magistrate judge found plaintiff ineligible to proceed

in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and ordered plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing

fee. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does

not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed July 8, 2010, is

affirmed; and

/////

Case 2:10-cv-01605-GEB-DAD Document 7 Filed 08/12/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Within fifteen days from the service of this order, plaintiff shall pay the

$350.00 filing fee. Failure to pay the filing fee will result in the dismissal of this action without

prejudice. 

Dated: August 11, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:10-cv-01605-GEB-DAD Document 7 Filed 08/12/10 Page 2 of 2