Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-04455/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-04455-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 5:10-CV-04455 JW

DARRYL M. WOO (CSB NO. 100513)

dwoo@fenwick.com 

RYAN J. MARTON (CSB NO. 223979) 

rmarton@fenwick.com 

LESLIE A. KRAMER (CSB NO. 253313) 

lkramer@fenwick.com 

FENWICK &WEST LLP

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile:(415) 281-1350 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Vendio Services, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

VENDIO SERVICES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

P.S. PRODUCTS, INC., an Arkansas 

corporation, and BILLY PENNINGTON, an 

individual, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 5:10-cv-04455 JW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Vendio Services, Inc. (“Vendio”) filed this declaratory judgment 

action on October 1, 2010; 

WHEREAS, Defendants P.S. Products, Inc. and Billy Pennington (collectively, 

Defendants) filed their Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, Motion 

to Transfer (“Motion”) on October 27, 2010 (Dkt. No. 15); 

WHEREAS, Defendants’ Motion is currently scheduled for hearing on February 14, 2011; 

WHEREAS, Vendio intends to file its First Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A; 

WHEREAS, Defendants consent to the filing of the First Amended Complaint pursuant to 

Federal Rule 15(a)(2); 

WHEREAS, in light of the First Amended Complaint, Defendants’ Motion is moot and, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge James Ware

1/4/2011

Case 5:10-cv-04455-JW Document 25 Filed 01/04/11 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 CASE NO. 5:10-CV-04455 JW

therefore, Defendants agree to withdraw that Motion; 

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed that Defendants’ deadline to respond to 

the First Amended Complaint shall be February 2, 2011; 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED BY THE UNDERSIGNED PARTIES that: 

1. Subject to the Court’s approval, the First Amended Complaint is deemed filed; 

2. Defendants’ Motion (Dkt. No. 15) is moot and hereby withdrawn; 

3. Defendants’ deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint is now February 

2, 2011. 

SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 3, 2011 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Ryan J. Marton 

Ryan J. Marton 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Vendio Services, Inc. 

Dated: January 3, 2011 STEWART LAW FIRM 

By: /s/ Chris H. Stewart

Chris H. Stewart 

Attorneys for Defendants 

P.S. Products, Inc. and Billy Pennington

before ________ as a separate docket entry. 

shall be filed on or 

the hearing set for February 14, 2011 is VACATED. The Clerk shall terminate pending motion. January 5, 2011 as a separate docket entry. 

Case 5:10-cv-04455-JW Document 25 Filed 01/04/11 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 CASE NO. 5:10-CV-04455 JW

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

I, Ryan J. Marton, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained 

from any signatories indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 3rd day of January 2011, at San Francisco, 

California. 

 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Ryan J. Marton 

Ryan J. Marton 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Vendio Services, Inc. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January ___, 2011 By: 

Honorable James Ware 

 AS MODIFIED. 

4

Case 5:10-cv-04455-JW Document 25 Filed 01/04/11 Page 3 of 3