Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-2_07-cv-00056/USCOURTS-ared-2_07-cv-00056-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

Doc. No. 16. 

2

Doc. No. 15.

3

The requests were: “REQUEST NO. 2: Please produce any documents which support

your claim for alleged bad faith in your complaint . . . REQUEST NO. 8 : Please provide all

employment records, time sheets and/or time cards for the 48 hour period before and after the

fire.” 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HELENA DIVISION

EVELYN WHEELER and

JOHNNY WHEELER PLAINTIFFS 

 

VS. 2:07-CV-00056-WRW

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY DEFENDANT

INSURANCE COMPANY 

ORDER

Pending is Defendant’s Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 14). Plaintiffs have responded.1

For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED.

Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs’ responses to the First Set of Requests for Production

and First Set of Interrogatories were inadequate. According to Defendant, the “deficient

responses by the Plaintiffs fall into two categories: discovery that Plaintiffs ‘will supplement’

and discovery that Plaintiffs claim to already have produced during the investigation of this

claim.”2

Plaintiffs responded “Will Supplement” to Request No. 2 and Request No. 8.3 According

to Defendant, supplements have not been received. Unless there is something that doesn’t meet

the eye here, Plaintiffs must respond to Defendant’s Requests No. 2 and No. 8 by noon,

Thursday, July 31, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-00056-BRW Document 19 Filed 07/28/08 Page 1 of 2
4

Doc. No. 15, Ex. A.

2

As to several other requests -- Request No. 6 (request for credit card statements), Request

No. 7 (request for phone records), Request No. 10 (request for bank statements), and Request 

No. 14 (request for documentation related to the alarm service on Plaintiffs’ home) -- Plaintiffs

responded that the documents “burned in the fire” and that they already “gave all the information

they had regarding this to State Farm’s representatives when they first made their claim.”4 In

response to these requests, Plaintiff is directed to get duplicates from the bank, telephone

company, credit card company, or other appropriate entity and provide them to Defendant by 

5 p.m., Friday, August 8, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of July, 2008.

 /s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr.__________

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00056-BRW Document 19 Filed 07/28/08 Page 2 of 2