Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00182/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00182-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 460
Nature of Suit: Deportation
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Recovery of Debt to US

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Ruth A. Harvey

Assistant Director

E. Kathleen Shahan

John J. Siemietkowski

Frances M. McLaughlin

Trial Attorneys

Commercial Litigation Branch

Civil Division

P.O. Box 875

Ben Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044-0875

Tele: (202) 514-3368; Fax: (202) 514-9163

John.Siemietkowski@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

GONZALES & GONZALES BONDS ) CASE NO. 10-CV-182 MHP

AND INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., and )

AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY, INC., ) 

)

Defendants. )

)

 )

STIPULATION THAT PLAINTIFF IS NOT REQUIRED AT THIS TIME TO FILE A

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16-5

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, the parties, through their respective counsel,

stipulate and agree as follows:

On April 8, 2010, the Court designated this case as related to 09-CV-4029 and transferred

Stipulation that Plantiff is not Required 

at this Time to File a Motion for Summary 

Judgment Pursuant to Local Rule 16-5

 10-CV-182 MHP Page 1

Case 3:10-cv-00182-EMC Document 38 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

it from Judge White to Judge Patel. 09-CV-4029, dkt. # 33. On June 11, 2010, Defendants filed

their Answer in this case. 10-CV-182, dkt. # 35.

Plaintiff contends that Local Rule 16-5 requires a plaintiff to file a motion for summary

judgment within 28 days of receipt of a defendant’s answer in actions for Court review on an

administrative record. Plaintiff further contends that this is an action for Court review on an

administrative record. Defendants contend that Local Rule 16-5 does not require Plaintiff to file

a motion for summary judgment at all in this action. Defendants further contend that this action

is not an action for Court review on an administrative record, and that full discovery will be

required before Defendants can oppose any summary judgment that Plaintiff may seek to file.

The Court has yet to decide the nature of the case in the related matter of 09-CV-4029, or 

the nature of the case in this action. Additionally, in this instance, Plaintiff’s filing a motion for

summary judgment would seem to contradict #4 of Judge Patel’s Standing Orders, which states

“Motions to dismiss shall not be filed before the initial Case Management Conference except by

leave of court.” The Court has not yet held its initial Case Management Conference in this case. 

 There have been no prior modifications regarding Local Rule 16-5 in this case. The

requested stipulation would have no effect on the schedule for the case. Therefore, the Parties

stipulate that Plaintiff is not required to file a motion for summary judgment at this time, and that

Plaintiff’s forbearance from filing a motion for summary judgment at this time shall not be

deemed to be a violation of Local Rule 16-5.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 29, 2010

Respectfully submitted,

Stipulation that Plantiff is not Required 

at this Time to File a Motion for Summary 

Judgment Pursuant to Local Rule 16-5

 10-CV-182 MHP Page 2

Case 3:10-cv-00182-EMC Document 38 Filed 07/01/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TONY WEST ROXBOROUGH, POMERANCE, NYE & ADREANI

Assistant Attorney General

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

/s/ John J. Siemietkowski /s/ David R. Ginsburg

J. CHRISTOPHER KOHN GARY A. NYE (Cal. Bar No. 126104)

RUTH A. HARVEY DAVID R. GINSBURG (Cal. Bar. No. 210900)

E. KATHLEEN SHAHAN Attorneys for Defendants G&G/ASC

(D.C. Bar No.267872)

JOHN J. SIEMIETKOWSKI 

(PA Bar. No. 50346)

FRANCES M. MCLAUGHLIN 

(FL Bar No. 0256640)

Civil Division

U.S. Department of Justice

Commercial Litigation Branch

P.O. Box 875

Ben Franklin Station

Washington, DC 20044-0875

Tel: (202) 307-0249

Fax: (202) 307-0494

Attorneys for Plaintiff the United States of America

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

Marilyn H. Patel

United States District Judge

Stipulation that Plantiff is not Required 

at this Time to File a Motion for Summary 

Judgment Pursuant to Local Rule 16-5

 10-CV-182 MHP Page 3

July 1, 2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:10-cv-00182-EMC Document 38 Filed 07/01/10 Page 3 of 3