Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05016/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05016-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL DEATRICK,

Plaintiff,

v.

SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, 

INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-05016-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline for Plaintiff to provide Defendant a proposed Third 

Amended Complaint 5/6/15

Deadline to file Defendant’s motion to enforce arbitration 

provisions and motion re: preemption 5/29/15

Deadline to file Plaintiff’s motion to toll statute of limitations, 

motion to file a Third Amended Complaint, and motion to 

certify a Rule 23 class 

8/7/15

Case management conference 10/28/15 at 2:00 p.m.

Pretrial conference 3/25/16 at 2:00 p.m.

Trial 4/11/16 at 8:30 a.m.

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

Case 3:13-cv-05016-JST Document 128 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2015

 _________________________________ 

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-05016-JST Document 128 Filed 04/30/15 Page 2 of 2