Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00272/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00272-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EDIN S. CASTELLANOS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JEREMY J. MAYA, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 15-cv-00272-JSW 

ORDER RE ISSUES THAT PARTIES 

HAVE STATED ARE FOR COURT TO 

DECIDE AND PLAINTIFF’S TRIAL 

BRIEF RE EVIDENCE AT CHP OFFICE

Re: Dkt. No. 74 

In their Joint Pretrial Conference Order, the parties have identified three issues that are for 

the Court to decide. The Court finds that the second issue is adequately addressed by the parties 

memoranda of law in support of their disputed jury instructions. The Court has reviewed the 

parties’ trial briefs and finds that those briefs do not adequately address issues one and three in a 

manner to permit the Court to resolve these issues in advance of the trial date. Accordingly, the 

Court HEREBY ORDERS the parties to submit further briefing, not to exceed five pages, 

clarifying their positions on issues one and three by June 17, 2016. The parties may file a 

response to the opposing party’s clarifying brief by no later than June 21, 2016. 

In Plaintiff’s trial brief, he states that he will seek to admit evidence of events that occurred 

at the CHP office pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). It appears that this request would 

have been better addressed by way of a motion in limine to admit evidence, rather than by trial 

brief. 

In the interests of justice, the Court will provide the parties a further opportunity to brief 

that issue. 

// 

// 

Case 4:15-cv-00272-JSW Document 91 Filed 06/13/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

adm

ma

Da

By June

mit and furth

ay file a resp

IT IS S

ated: June 13

e 17, 2016, P

her argumen

onse by Jun

SO ORDER

3, 2016 

Plaintiff shal

nt as to why s

e 21, 2016. 

RED. 

2

ll file a three

such evidenc

___

JEF

Un

e page brief 

ce is admissi

__________

FFREY S. W

nited States D

that states w

ible and to w

___________

WHITE 

District Judg

what evidenc

what claims. 

__________

ge 

ce he seeks to

 Defendant 

________ 

o

Case 4:15-cv-00272-JSW Document 91 Filed 06/13/16 Page 2 of 2