Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02066/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02066-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL J. CARPENTER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2066 DFL PAN P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARTZENEGGER,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On October 13, 2005, plaintiff, a prisoner at Mule Creek State Prison, filed an

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a civil rights action. See 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(a). On January 24, 2006, the court informed plaintiff that to commence an action he must

file a complaint and gave plaintiff 30 days to do so. 

The 30 days have passed and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or in any way

responded to the order. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 20 days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections. 

Case 2:05-cv-02066-DFL-EFB Document 5 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 21, 2006.

/004

/carp2066.f&r ftf comp

Case 2:05-cv-02066-DFL-EFB Document 5 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2