Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00097/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00097-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSEPH WOODS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MATOON, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:16-cv-0097 AC P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

 Recent new case opening documents were served on plaintiff’s address of record and 

returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 

183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address 

change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal 

service and plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of a current address. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a 

United States District Judge to this action; and 

 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for 

failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

Case 2:16-cv-00097-MCE-AC Document 4 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: April 29, 2016 

Case 2:16-cv-00097-MCE-AC Document 4 Filed 05/02/16 Page 2 of 2