Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-00956/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-00956-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PRETRIAL STATEMENT AND RELATED 

DEADLINES - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Daniel M. Press, Esq. 

CHUNG & PRESS, P.C. 

6723 Whittier Ave., Suite 302 

McLean, VA 22101 

(703) 734-3800 

(703) 734-0590 fax 

dpress@chung-press.com 

Counsel for ADI Corp., Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

San Francisco Division 

ADI CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

PGS OEM, Inc., formerly known as 

PRINCETON GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, INC., 

and 

PRINCETON DIGITAL (USA) CORP., 

 Defendants 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: C-04-0956-PJH-ARB__________ 

STIPULATION AND 

CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND 

PRETRIAL STATEMENT AND 

RELATED FILING DEADLINES, AND 

DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. PRESS 

IN SUPPORT THEREOF 

 NOW COME all parties, by and through the undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Local 

Civil Rule 6-2, respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline in this action for filing the 

Joint Pretrial Statement, trial briefs, and other filings due 30 days in advance of the Pretrial 

Conference by one week, until September 27, 2005. In support hereof, the parties state as 

follows: 

1. The Case Management Order in this case set the Pretrial Conference in this case 

for October 20, 2005, and provided that the Joint Pretrial Statement, Trial Briefs, Motions in 

Limine, Exhibits, Witness Lists, and other matters are due to be filed 30 days prior thereto, i.e., 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PRETRIAL STATEMENT AND RELATED 

DEADLINES - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

by September 20, 2005. The only deadline between the 30-day deadline and the pretrial 

conference is the deadline for responses to Motions in Limine, 15 days before the pretrial 

conference 

2. The parties at this time do not intend to file Motions in Limine, but should such 

motions be necessary, the parties agree that responses will be filed in accordance with the 

existing deadline, shortening their response time accordingly. 

3. The Parties, through counsel, had reached a settlement agreement in this action, at 

least in principle, but Defendant PGS has not executed the agreement or tendered payment, and 

has instead stated that it intends to file bankruptcy. Nonetheless, the parties are continuing to try 

to reach a settlement. 

4. Because the parties had hoped to settle, they have not completed the papers 

required to be filed by the 30-day deadline. 

 5. There have been no previous time modifications in this case affecting the dates at 

issue. The only prior modification was a brief extension of the dispositive motion deadline. 

 6. The requested extension would have no effect on the pretrial or trial schedule. 

WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that this Stipulation be approved, and that 

that the deadline for filings due 30 days before the Pretrial Conference be extended by one week 

to September 27, 2005. 

Dated this 20th day of September, 2005.

Respectfully submitted, 

_/s/_Daniel M. Press________________ 

Daniel M. Press, Esq. 

CHUNG & PRESS, P.C. 

6723 Whittier Ave., Suite 302 

McLean, VA 22101 

(703) 734-3800 

(703) 734-0590 fax 

dpress@chung-press.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PRETRIAL STATEMENT AND RELATED 

DEADLINES - 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

__/s/ Curtis C. Jung__________________

Curtis C. Jung (SBN 130657)_ 

Clifford P. Jung (SBN 181117)_ 

JUNG & YUEN 

808 North Spring Street, 9th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90012 

(213) 680-1001 

Counsel for Defendant PGS OEM, Inc. 

 ___/s/ Ronald W. Ishida_____ ___________

 Ronald W. Ishida (SBN 083393) 

 Of Counsel to 

 Jeffrey J. Chang & Associates 

 433 California Street, Suite 810 

 San Francisco, CA 94104 

 (415) 788-8811 

 (415) 399-9781 facsimile 

 Counsel for Defendant Princeton Digital 

(USA) Corp. 

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the 

other signatories. 

/s/ Daniel M. Press____________________ 

 Daniel M. Press 

DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. PRESS

 I, Daniel M. Press, declare and state under penalty of perjury as follows: 

 1. I am of legal age and competent to testify. If called as a witness, I could and 

would truthfully testify as set forth herein on my own personal knowledge. 

 2. I am a member of the bar of this Court and counsel for Plaintiff herein. 

 3. I have read the foregoing Stipulation, which I incorporate herein by reference. 

4. The Stipulation accurately and truthfully sets forth with particularity the reasons 

for the requested enlargement of time; discloses all previous time modifications in the case, 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PRETRIAL STATEMENT AND RELATED 

DEADLINES - 4 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

whether by stipulation or Court order; and describes the effect the requested time modification 

would have on the schedule for the case. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on September 20, 2005. 

 _/s/ Daniel M. Press_________ 

 Daniel M. Press 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: ____________________

 ___________________________________

 U.S. District Judge 

9/21/05