Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01377/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01377-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN D. BRYANT, 

 

Plaintiff, 

 

vs. 

 

APOTEX, INC., et al., 

 

Defendants. 

 /

Case No. 1:12-cv-01377 LJO JLT

 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE

APPLICATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

(Doc. 46)

On January 17, 2013, Defendants filed an ex parte application to modify the briefing schedule

regarding their motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court has considered the application and

finds good cause to modify the briefing schedule. Accordingly, Defendants shall file their joint reply

brief by no later than January 25, 2013. Further, in the interest of justice and judicial economy, the

Court will instruct the Clerk of Court to file and docket Plaintiff’s opposition papers.1

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 18, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 66h44d

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff served Defendants with his opposition but failed to file the document with the Court. Defendants have,

1

however, attached a true copy of Plaintiff’s opposition papers to their ex parte application. (Doc. 46-2, Exs. B & C.)

Case 1:12-cv-01377-LJO-JLT Document 48 Filed 01/18/13 Page 1 of 1