Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02052/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02052-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ABE WILLIAMS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

S. BAHADUR, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-2052-TLN-EFB P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On February 26, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 40.) Plaintiff 

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 41.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 

file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

proper analysis.

///

Case 2:13-cv-02052-TLN-EFB Document 43 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 26, 2016, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant Bahadur’s May 9, 2015 motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s retaliation claim (ECF 

No. 27) is granted.

So ordered.

Dated: March 30, 2016

Case 2:13-cv-02052-TLN-EFB Document 43 Filed 03/31/16 Page 2 of 2