Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00561/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00561-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAMALJIT SINGH GHAG, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

DENNIS SMITH, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:07-cv-00561-AWI-TAG HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 8)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc.5)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On April 11, 2007, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241 in this Court. (Doc. 1). 

On June 6, 2007, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition as moot. (Doc. 5). 

On August 17, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending the motion to dismiss be granted and that the petition for writ

of habeas corpus be dismissed because the case was moot. (Doc. 8). This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. On August 28, 2007, Petitioner

filed his objections. (Doc. 9). 

Case 1:07-cv-00561-AWI-TAG Document 10 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner’s

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation is

supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed August 17, 2007 (Doc. 8), is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 2, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00561-AWI-TAG Document 10 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 2