Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-1_04-cv-02890/USCOURTS-alnd-1_04-cv-02890-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

LEROY NUNNALLY JR., et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CASE NUMBER: CV 04-KOB-2890-E

)

EQUIFAX INFORMATION )

SERVICES LLC, )

)

Defendants. )

FURTHER ADDENDUM TO MEMORANDUM OPINION

FILED ON JUNE 20, 2006

On review of the published slip opinion, this judge noticed a comment in the

appellate court opinion which baffles him. That statement is “To conflate the meaning of

‘consumer report’ with ‘file’ would make the terms redundant.” Who was the conflationor? 

Where did that come from? 

This the 28 day of June, 2006. th

 

 

 ROBERT B. PROPST

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

FILED

 2006 Jun-28 AM 09:36

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 1:04-cv-02890-KOB Document 37 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 1