Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01242/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01242-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On October 26, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation seeking to dismiss the action. (Doc. 53) The 

stipulation relies upon Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which “the plaintiff may 

dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party 

serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by 

all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been filed, an 

order of the Court is not required for the dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San 

Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice of 

dismissal with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 27, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

VICTOR JONES,

 Plaintiff,

v.

RICHARD MOORE, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:11-cv-01242 JLT

ORDER CLOSING CASE

(Doc. 53)

Case 1:11-cv-01242-JLT Document 54 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 1