Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-384/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-03561 WHA

ORDER RE ORACLE’S

PRÉCIS REQUEST

(Dkt. No. 1808)

Oracle may file its motion directed at Roderic Cattell by MONDAY, MAY 9 AT NOON,

with Google’s response due by FRIDAY, MAY 13 AT NOON, and any reply due by MONDAY,

MAY 16 AT NOON. The briefs in support and opposition are NOT TO EXCEED TEN PAGES, and

each side’s backup material shall be limited to FIFTY PAGES. In the meantime, while Google’s

counsel will be free to refer to the subject of Cattell’s testimony during opening statements, they

run the risk that his testimony will be excluded in whole or in part.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 4, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1820 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 1