Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01882/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01882-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

JESSICA A. DAYTON (State Bar #231698)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI

and DISABILITY RIGHTS 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION

SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK MOLSKI, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION

SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

EL 7 MARES RESTAURANT;

ADALBERTO & SARA AVILA, dba EL

7 MARES RESTAURANT,

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-1882 PVT

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Mutual Settlement Agreement and Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own costs

and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction

over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375

(1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement

agreements).

///

Case 5:04-cv-01882-PVT Document 26 Filed 06/15/2005 Page 1 of 2 Case 5:04-cv-01882-PVT Document 27 Filed 06/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON -2-

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

DATED: 6/15/05 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: ______/s/_________________________

Jessica A. Dayton

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS

DATED: 5/16/05 JAMES & MCCLELLAN

By: _______/s/___________________________

Renton Rolph. 

Attorneys for Defendants ADALBERTO & SARA

AVILA, dba EL 7 MARES RESTAURANT

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Mutual Settlement Agreement and Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

DATED:________________, 2005

______________________________________

Hon. Patricia V. Trumbull

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 5:04-cv-01882-PVT Document 26 Filed 06/15/2005 Page 2 of 2

JUNE 16, 2005

/S/ Patricia V. Trumbull

Case 5:04-cv-01882-PVT Document 27 Filed 06/16/05 Page 2 of 2