Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05241/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05241-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL 

Case No: 3:09-cv-05241-EDL 

CHRISTOPHER D. BANYS (CA SBN 230038) 

cdb@lanierlawfirm.com 

DANIEL W. BEDELL (CA SBN 254912) 

dwb@lanierlawfirm.com 

THE LANIER LAW FIRM, P.C. 

2200 Geng Road, Suite 200 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Telephone: (650) 322-9100 

Facsimile: (650) 322-9103 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

MITCHELL PRUST 

MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) 

MJacobs@mofo.com 

RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) 

RHung@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: (415) 268-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 

RUDY Y. KIM (CA SBN 199426) 

RudyKim@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 

Telephone: (650) 813-5600 

Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

APPLE INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MITCHELL PRUST, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

APPLE INC., 

Defendant.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

Case No. 3:09-cv-05241-EDL 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL 

Case 3:09-cv-05241-EDL Document 63 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-05241-EDL Document62 Filed06/09/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL 

Case No: 3:09-cv-05241-EDL 1

The parties, through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) that: (1) all claims for relief asserted against APPLE INC. by 

MITCHELL PRUST herein are dismissed with prejudice; (2) all counterclaims for relief against 

MITCHELL PRUST by APPLE INC. are dismissed without prejudice; and (3) all attorneys’ fees, 

costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same. 

Dated: June 9, 2010 CHRISTOPHER D. BANYS

DANIEL W. BEDELL

THE LANIER LAW FIRM, P.C. 

By: /s/ Christopher D. Banys

CHRISTOPHER D. BANYS 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

MITCHELL PRUST 

Dated: June 9, 2010 MICHAEL A. JACOBS 

RUDY Y. KIM 

RICHARD S.J. HUNG 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Rudy Y. Kim

RUDY Y. KIM 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

APPLE INC. 

UPON STIPULATION of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: (1) all claims for relief asserted against APPLE 

INC. by MITCHELL PRUST herein are dismissed with prejudice; (2) all counterclaims for relief 

against MITCHELL PRUST by APPLE INC. are dismissed without prejudice; and (3) all 

attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________, 2010 

THE HON. ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case3:09-cv-05241-EDL Document62 Filed06/09/10 Page2 of 2

June 9

Case 3:09-cv-05241-EDL Document 63 Filed 06/09/10 Page 2 of 2