Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03953/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03953-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MONTEREY BAY MILITARY HOUSING, 

LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PINNACLE MONTEREY LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-03953-BLF 

ORDER RE MOTIONS

[Re: ECF 98, 99, 100, 101]

On January 21, 2015, Defendants filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction to Preserve 

Right to Specific Performance, ECF 98, followed shortly thereafter by a January 26, 2015 Ex 

Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order on Preliminary Injunction, ECF 100. On 

January 27, 2015, the Court held a hearing on Defendants’ Application for TRO with all parties in 

attendance. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. Defendants’ Application for TRO is DENIED because there is no risk of 

irreparable harm to Defendants at this time in light of the continued effect of the December 26, 

2012 preliminary injunction issued by the Monterey County Superior Court.

2. The parties are ordered to provide supplemental briefing on Plaintiffs’ Motion to 

Dissolve the December 26, 2012 preliminary injunction, ECF 36, in order to address the 

arguments raised in Defendants’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction:

a. Defendants’ supplemental brief of no more than seven (7) pages is due on or 

before February 3, 2015.

1

 

1 Because Defendants and Plaintiffs requested one week and 5 days respectively to prepare the 

supplemental briefing, the deadlines set forth in this order reflect that request and are intended to 

correct the Court’s misstatements on the record concerning the corresponding calendar dates.

Case 5:14-cv-03953-BLF Document 108 Filed 01/27/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

b. Plaintiffs’ responsive brief of no more than seven (7) pages is due on or 

before February 9, 2015.

c. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no further briefing or oral argument will 

be required.

3. Defendants’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF 98, is TERMINATED.2 The 

arguments raised in Defendants’ motion are subsumed under the issues raised in the parties’ 

briefing on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction and will be further addressed in 

the parties’ supplemental briefing. The Court will fully consider all arguments in the parties’ main 

and supplemental briefs in determining whether to dissolve the December 28, 2012 injunction 

issued by the Monterey County Superior Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2015

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

 

2

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Response, ECF 99, and Defendants’ Motion to 

Shorten Time for Hearing, ECF 101, are likewise TERMINATED as moot.

Case 5:14-cv-03953-BLF Document 108 Filed 01/27/15 Page 2 of 2