Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00227/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-00227-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TREMANE DARNELL CARTHEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

P. SCOTT, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:19-cv-00227-ADA-EPG (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT

(ECF Nos. 63, 65)

Tremane Darnell Carthen (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner, proceeding pro se and in 

forma pauperis, in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On June 27, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to supplement his complaint to add an 

Eighth Amendment sexual assault/sexual harassment/excessive force claim, a Fourth Amendment 

unreasonable search and seizure claim, and a First Amendment retaliation claim based on 

incidents that occurred at the United States Penitentiary, Lee County, in Virginia. (ECF Nos. 63,

64.) On June 29, 2022, the assigned Magistrate Judge entered findings and recommendations, 

recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for leave to supplement his complaint be denied. (ECF No. 

65 at 5-6.) The parties were provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and 

recommendations. No objections were filed. 

///

Case 1:19-cv-00227-DAD-EPG Document 81 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly,

1. The findings and recommendations issued on June 29, 2022, (ECF No. 65), are

adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to supplement his complaint, (ECF No. 63), is 

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 5, 2022 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-00227-DAD-EPG Document 81 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 2