Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07826/USCOURTS-ca4-09-07826-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

ON REHEARING

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7750

ANDREW D. WENMOTH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OVID WESLEY DUNCAN, JR., Librarian; LARRY MCBRIDE, 

Correctional Officer II; KENNY AIKENS, Correctional Hearing 

Officer; DIANA ROBIN MILLER, Associate Warden of Programs; 

TERESA WAID, Warden; JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner; CHARLENE 

SOTAK, Inmate Grievance Coordinator,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-7826

ANDREW D. WENMOTH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OVID WESLEY DUNCAN, JR., Librarian; LARRY MCBRIDE, 

Correctional Officer II; KENNY AIKENS, Correctional Hearing 

Officer; DIANA ROBIN MILLER, Associate Warden of Programs; 

TERESA WAID, Warden; JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner; CHARLENE 

SOTAK, Inmate Grievance Coordinator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal: 09-7826 Doc: 20 Filed: 06/09/2010 Pg: 1 of 3
2

No. 10-6073

ANDREW D. WENMOTH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OVID WESLEY DUNCAN, JR., Librarian; LARRY MCBRIDE, 

Correctional Officer II; KENNY AIKENS, Correctional Hearing 

Officer; DIANA ROBIN MILLER, Associate Warden of Programs; 

TERESA WAID, Warden; JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner; CHARLENE 

SOTAK, Inmate Grievance Coordinator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, 

Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00182-JPB-JSK)

Submitted: May 13, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010

Before DUNCAN and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew D. Wenmoth, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas E. Buck, April Joy 

Wheeler, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 09-7826 Doc: 20 Filed: 06/09/2010 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Andrew D. Wenmoth 

appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wenmoth’s motion for 

appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Wenmoth v. Duncan, No. 3:08-cv-00182-JPB-JSK 

(N.D. W. Va. Aug. 26, 2009 & Dec. 18, 2009). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 09-7826 Doc: 20 Filed: 06/09/2010 Pg: 3 of 3