Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01288/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01288-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD TURNER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

J. SULLIVAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-01288-LJO-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 36)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 22)

ORDER DECLINING EXERCISE OF

SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

ORDER DISMISSING STATE LAW

CLAIMS

Plaintiff, Edward Turner (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 28, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations which contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed

on or before July 28, 2007. To date, no party has filed

objections.

Case 1:05-cv-01288-LJO-DLB Document 39 Filed 09/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 28, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust,

filed January 5, 2007, is GRANTED; and,

3. The exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over

plaintiff’s state law claims is DECLINED, and the state law

claims are therefore DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 18, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01288-LJO-DLB Document 39 Filed 09/18/07 Page 2 of 2