Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02311/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02311-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

- 1 - 

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No: C 06-2311 SC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROY S. GORDET (SBN 103916) 

98 Battery Street, Suite 601 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 627-0300 

Facsimile: (415) 627-9020 

roy@gordetlaw.com 

Attorney for Defendants 

PHILIP CUSHWAY a/k/a PHIL CUSHWAY and ARTROCK, INC. 

KENNETH A. FEINSWOG (SBN 129562) 

6100 Center Drive, Suite 630 

Los Angeles, California 90045 

Telephone: (310) 846-5800 

Facsimile: (310) 846-5801 

Attorney for Plaintiffs BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING 

SERVICES, INC. and BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LIMITED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP 

MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC. 

and BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL 

GROUP, LIMITED, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

PHILIP CUSHWAY a/k/a PHIL 

CUSHWAY and ARTROCK, INC., 

 Defendants. 

) 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No: C 06-2311 SC 

SECOND STIPULATION RE EXTENSION 

OF ALL COURT DEADLINES AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 

On July 28, 2006, this Honorable Court issued a scheduling order pursuant to a Joint 

Case Management Conference Statement and a Case Management Conference held before the 

Court on July 28, 2006. 

The parties participated in an ENE held on October 4, 2006, as well as a follow-up 

Case 3:06-cv-02311-SC Document 25 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Case No: C 06-2311 SC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

telephone session with the Evaluator on October 18, 2006. Subsequently the parties conducted 

discovery. Some discovery issues arose, and on February 2, 2007 the parties sought and were 

granted an extension of time. 

 During the course of attempting to resolve the discovery disputes, the parties began 

settlement discussions that have been steadily progressing. In recent weeks the parties have 

exchanged written drafts of a settlement agreement and mutual release, and have had telephone 

conferences to resolve each party’s issues. 

However, the parties believe that the remainder of the settlement negotiations, including a 

probable sell-off period, will extend past the current deadlines set by the Court. Moreover, in 

light of the upcoming discovery cut-off, the parties would prefer to continue to devote time and 

energy to settlement efforts, rather than attempting to complete discovery obligations prior to the 

upcoming discovery deadline. 

Therefore, the parties jointly request that the Court continue all deadlines in the Court’s 

Order dated February 5, 2007 for 104 days (3 months and 2 weeks), as follows:. 

 Current Dates Proposed Dates

Close of Discovery: June 14, 2007 September 26, 2007 

Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: July 27, 2007 November 9, 2007 

Trial Date: August 13, 2007 November 26, 2007 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Date: May 18, 2007 /roysgordet/

Roy S. Gordet, 

Attorney for Defendants 

Philip Cushway a/k/a Phil Cushway and ArtRock, 

Inc. 

Date: May 18, 2007 /kenneth a.feinswog/

Kenneth A. Feinswog, 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Bravado International Group Merchandising 

Services, Inc. and Bravado International Group, 

Limited 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENIED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:06-cv-02311-SC Document 25 Filed 05/22/07 Page 2 of 2