Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01033/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01033-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH G. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-01-1033 FCD EFB P

vs.

CAL A. TERHUNE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 10, 2006, defendants Allen, Mann,

Gomez, Alegria, Terhune, Fisher, Hronek, Miller, Santana, Geraghty, and Altchek filed a request

to vacate the date for filing a pretrial statement on the grounds that plaintiff has sought

modification of the scheduling order due to medical problems. They also note that there is

currently pending a motion to dismiss, which, if granted, will relieve defendants of their

obligation to file a pretrial statement. On October 11, 2006, defendants Chapman and

Correctional Managed Care Corporation filed a request to vacate the date for filing a pretrial

statement, also on the grounds that plaintiff has filed a motion to modify the schedule due to

medical problems, and on the motions pending which, if granted, would moot their filing of a

pretrial statement. In light of the court order filed November 2, 2006, these requests will be

Case 2:01-cv-01033-FCD-EFB Document 281 Filed 11/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

denied as unnecessary. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ motions filed October

10, 2006, and October 11, 2006, to vacate the date by which to file pretrial statements, are

denied. 

DATED: November 15, 2006.

Case 2:01-cv-01033-FCD-EFB Document 281 Filed 11/15/06 Page 2 of 2