Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-88-01989/USCOURTS-ca10-88-01989-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 

---

f'ILED 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

United State1i Court of Appeals 

Tenth Cin:u:t 

JAN 4 - 1990 

.ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk RICHARD MYERS, RICHARD CLIFTON KIMES, ) 

WILLIAM L. HUFFMAN, JAN COLLINS, ) 

STEPHEN G. FLEMING, BILLY S. SINGLETON, ) 

PAUL WALLACE, GEORGE R. PORRAS, ) 

MICHAEL L. RULONG, JOHN HART, RALPH ) 

COMFORT, CHARLES RUMPH, ALAN SOKOLIK, ) 

THOMAS G. EISELE, FRED EVENSEN, ) 

MARK LANCASTER, GARLAND YOUNG, GABOR ) 

ESSEK, RONALD DEPOLO, LARRY FALCONE, ) 

MIKE DAVIS, ANTHONY J. CORRIGAN, ) 

ARPAD SZILVASI, NORMAN MASTERS, ROY ) 

BARTRAM, PAUL TOTTEN, JAMES PARTLOW, ) 

RAYMOND SNYDER, ANNA ADKINS, RICHARD F. ) 

WHITE, CARL CARNS, ANDREW CLARK, ) 

JOHN SANKOE, III, WALTER HURD, ) 

JAMES MARSHALL, DANNY DIMAURO and ) 

RICK MARSHALL, ) 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; 

INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, 

AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURE IMPLEMENT 

WORKERS OF AMERICA, 

Defendants- Appellees. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

No. 88-1989 

(D.C. No. 86- 2041) 

(D. Kan.) 

* -- This ord~r--and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 88-1989 Document: 01019958695 Date Filed: 01/04/1990 Page: 1 
' M 

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, Circuit Judges, and KANE,* District Judge. 

*Honorable John L. Kane, District Judge, United States District 

Court for the District of Colorado, sitting by designation. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

This is an appeal from a district court order granting 

summary judgment in favor of defendants in a hybrid breach of 

contract/unfair representation suit under § 301 of the Labor 

Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. 

Plaintiff Richard Myers is the sole appellant properly listed 

on the notice of appeal filed herein. See Torres v. Oakland 

Scavenger Co., 108 S. Ct. 2405, 2409 (1988)(use of phrase ''et al." 

fails to provide sufficient notice of additional parties' 

intention to appeal, as required by Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)). 

Plaintiffs' contention that inclusion of a reference to 

"plaintiffs above named" in the notice somehow corrects this 

deficiency is completely unpersuasive where, as here, the caption 

referred to also names only ''Richard Myers, et al." Accordingly, 

we lack jurisdiction over all other purported appellants, and 

2 

Appellate Case: 88-1989 Document: 01019958695 Date Filed: 01/04/1990 Page: 2 
appellees' motion to dismiss the latter from this appeal must be 

granted. Id. 

On the merits of plaintiff Myers' appeal, we agree with the 

disposition of the district court and affirm for substantially the 

reasons stated in its memorandum and order of April 4, 1988. 

Appellees' motion to dismiss this appeal as to all appellants 

except Richard Myers is GRANTED. The judgment of the United 

States District Court for the District of Kansas is AFFIRMED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

3 

Appellate Case: 88-1989 Document: 01019958695 Date Filed: 01/04/1990 Page: 3