Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04577/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04577-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ACTIVIDENTITY CORP.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

INTERCEDE GROUP PLC, et al.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C08-4577 VRW (BZ)

THIRD DISCOVERY ORDER

After reviewing the papers in this case, IT IS ORDERED as

follows:

1. Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order Barring the

Disclosure of Intercede Confidential Information to Mr.

Michael Neumann (Doc. No. 97) is GRANTED as unopposed.

2. Defendants’ Motion to Seal (Doc. No. 101) is GRANTED

for the following documents:

1. Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (Doc.

No. 97.)

2. Declaration of Richard Parris (Doc. No. 98)

3. Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Richard Parris

Case 3:08-cv-04577-VRW Document 122 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Joseph Belichik

(Doc. No. 99).

3. Defendants’ Motion to Seal Exhibit 12 to the

Belichick Declaration is DENIED. See Contratto v. Ethicon,

Inc., 227 F.R.D. 304, 307 (N.D. Cal. 2005). 

4. Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions and Contempt (Doc.

No. 108) is DENIED without prejudice. If defendants wish,

they may re-file a properly noticed motion in compliance with

the Civil Local Rules.

5. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 110) is DENIED

as moot.

6. Plaintiff’s Motion to Seal (Doc. No. 109) Exhibit 1

to the Holloway Declaration is DENIED. Contratto, 227 F.R.D.

at 307.

Dated: February 1, 2010 

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\ACTIVIDENTITY V. INTERCEDE\DISC ORD 3.FINAL RULING.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-04577-VRW Document 122 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 2