Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-3_06-cv-03002/USCOURTS-arwd-3_06-cv-03002-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HARRISON DIVISION

ROBERT D. JOHNSTON and

MELANIE K. JOHNSTON PLAINTIFFS

v. Civil No. 06-3002

JASON BRISCO, et al. DEFENDANTS

O R D E R

On this 12th day of April 2006, there comes on for

consideration the Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Response to Separate

Defendant Erwin L. Davis’ Answer to Complaint. (Doc. #52). Rule

7(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs what type of

pleadings are allowed and only permits a reply to a defendant’s

answer upon an order from the Court. The Court, being well and

sufficiently advised in the premises, finds that the motion should

be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court strikes

Plaintiffs’ Responses to Separate Defendant Erwin L. Davis’ Answer

to First Complaint (Doc. 49).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ Robert T. Dawson

Honorable Robert T. Dawson

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-03002-RTD Document 54 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>