Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02271/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02271-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID P. DEMAREST,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE CITY OF VALLEJO CALIFORNIA, 

et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-2271 GEB KJN PS

ORDER

On February 17, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 12.) No objections were 

filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 

////

Case 2:16-cv-02271-MCE-KJN Document 17 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed February 17, 2017 (ECF No. 12), 

are ADOPTED; 

2. Defendants Joseph Kreins and Andrew Bidou are dismissed from this action without 

leave to amend.

Dated: March 29, 2017

Case 2:16-cv-02271-MCE-KJN Document 17 Filed 03/30/17 Page 2 of 2