Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03434/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03434-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Defendant shall notice any motion for hearing on April 4, 2006. 

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHOOM INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

ELECTRONIC IMAGING SYSTEM,

Defendant. /

No. C05-03434 MJJ

ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR

LIMITED DISCOVERY AND

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

On January 9, 2006, the parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order re Limited Discovery,

Briefing Schedule, Hearing Date, and CMC Date (Doc. #22). The Court has considered the parties’

request and rules as follows: 

Defendant’s pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #19) is STRICKEN and the hearing set for

January 31, 2006, is VACATED. 

The Court GRANTS the parties’ request for limited discovery on the issue of subject matter

jurisdiction. The parties shall complete all discovery on this issue by February 17, 2006. Pursuant to

the parties Proposed Stipulation, Plaintiff shall respond to documents requests, interrogatories, and

requests for admission within two weeks of service. 

The deadline for Defendant to file a Motion to Dismiss (or an Answer to Plaintiff’s First

Amended Complaint) is set for March 1, 2006.

1

 Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be due on March 15, 2006,

and Defendant’s Reply shall be due on March 22, 2006. 

Case 3:05-cv-03434-MJJ Document 23 Filed 01/10/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Case Management Conference set for March 7, 2006, is VACATED and will be re-set by

the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 1/10/06 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-03434-MJJ Document 23 Filed 01/10/06 Page 2 of 2