Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-md-01606/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-md-01606-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 310
Nature of Suit: Airplane Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS

LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Dabulis v Singapore Airlines,

Inc, No 03-1929

Richelet v Lufthansa German

Airlines, No 04-3831

Rietchel v US Airways, Inc, No

01-3444

Braha v Delta Airlines, Inc, No

05-1544

Bianchetti v Delta Airlines, Inc,

No 04-4860

Vincent v American Airlines, Inc,

No 07-1604

 /

MDL Docket No 04-1606 VRW

ORDER

The court is in receipt of a letter dated August 6, 2007

from counsel for plaintiffs in Vincent v American Airlines, Inc

(07-1604) and Braha v Delta Airlines, Inc (05-1544). Counsel

requests a telephonic conference to discuss the scope of

permissible discovery. Counsel represents that she needs “to

Case 3:04-md-01606-VRW Document 655 Filed 08/13/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

conduct said discovery before the hearing of summary judgment

motions.” Counsel’s request for a discovery conference is DENIED. 

To the extent plaintiffs believe that additional discovery is

necessary, plaintiffs are to make a request pursuant to FRCP 56(f). 

This order applies to all cases that remain in MDL 1606.

SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:04-md-01606-VRW Document 655 Filed 08/13/07 Page 2 of 2