Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04187/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04187-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CASE NO. 4:07-CV-04187 SBA 

LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB No. 054283) 

 (lpasahow@fenwick.com) 

DAVID L. HAYES (CSB No. 122894) 

 (dhayes@fenwick.com) 

MICHAEL J. SACKSTEDER (CSB No. 191605) 

 (msacksteder@fenwick.com) 

SAINA S. SHAMILOV (CSB No. 216636) 

 (sshamilov@fenwick.com) 

HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB No. 221511) 

 (hribera@fenwick.com) 

TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB NO. 236096) 

 (tgregorian@fenwick.com) 

LESLIE A. KRAMER (CSB NO. 253313) 

(lkramer@fenwick.com) 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center, 801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, a 

German corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

i2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 4:07-cv-04187 SBA 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

Judge: Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong 

Plaintiff SAP Aktiengesellschaft (“SAP”), and Defendant i2 Technologies, Inc. (“i2”), by 

and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate that: (1) SAP shall have until and 

including January 11, 2008, to serve its Patent Local Rules 3-1 and 3-2 Disclosure of Asserted 

Claims and Preliminary Infringement Contentions and Document Production Accompanying 

Disclosure; (2) i2 shall have until and including February 25, 2008, to serve its Patent Local 

Case 4:07-cv-04187-SBA Document 49 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

 SAP’S PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT 

CONTENTIONS 2 

Rules 3-3 and 3-4 Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and Document Production Accompanying 

Disclosure. 

Dated: January 4, 2008 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: 

Saina Shamilov 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SAP Akteingesellschaft 

Dated: January 4, 2008 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & 

WALKER LLP 

By: 

Theodore Stevenson, III 

Attorneys for Defendant 

i2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Case 4:07-cv-04187-SBA Document 49 Filed 01/10/08 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

 SAP’S PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT 

CONTENTIONS 3 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 10, 2008 

The Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong

United States District Judge

Case 4:07-cv-04187-SBA Document 49 Filed 01/10/08 Page 3 of 3