Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02396/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02396-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONATHAN LEE RICHES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2396 LKK GGH P

vs.

STARBUCKS COFFEE CO., et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed November 28, 2007, plaintiff was ordered to file an affidavit in

support of his in forma pauperis affidavit on the form provided by the Clerk of Court or pay the

appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an affidavit in support of his in

forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

Case 2:07-cv-02396-LKK -GGH Document 4 Filed 02/19/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 02/19/08

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

rich2396.fifp

Case 2:07-cv-02396-LKK -GGH Document 4 Filed 02/19/08 Page 2 of 2