Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00415/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00415-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND M. DOUGLAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-0415 MCE AC (PS)

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the above-entitled action. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge by Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On June 8, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 

12. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 13.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 8, 2016 (ECF No. 12), are 

ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. All Section 1983 claims against defendants Cress, the County of Sacramento, 

Case 2:16-cv-00415-MCE-AC Document 14 Filed 07/15/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and the County of Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department are DISMISSED with 

prejudice, and all state claims against those defendants are DISMISSED without 

prejudice to their renewal in an appropriate state forum;

3. Service is appropriate for the following defendant: Sacramento County 

Sheriff’s Deputy Huffman, Badge # 458. 

a. Plaintiff is directed to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 30 days from the 

date this order is electronically filed, with all information needed by the Marshal to effect 

service of process (listed below). Within 10 days of having supplied this information, 

plaintiff shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to 

the United States Marshal (see attachment). The required documents shall be submitted 

directly to the United States Marshal either by personal delivery or by mail to: United 

States Marshals Service, 501 “I” Street, Suite 5600, Sacramento, CA 95814 (tel. 916-

930-2030). The court anticipates that, to effect service, the U.S. Marshal will require, for 

each defendant in paragraph 2 above, at least:

(1) One completed summons;

(2) One completed USM-285 form;

(3) One copy of the endorsed filed complaint, with an extra copy for 

the United States Marshal;

(4) One copy of the form to consent or decline to consent to 

magistrate judge jurisdiction; and

(5) One copy of this order.

b. The United States Marshal is directed to serve process promptly on 

each defendant identified in paragraph 2 above, without prepayment of costs.

c. In the event the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any reason whatsoever, to 

effect service within 90 days from the date of this order, the Marshal is directed to report 

that fact, and the reasons for it, to the undersigned.

///

///

Case 2:16-cv-00415-MCE-AC Document 14 Filed 07/15/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

d. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the 

U.S. Marshal, 501 “I” Street, Suite 5600, Sacramento, CA 95814 (tel. 916-930-2030).

Dated: July 15, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-00415-MCE-AC Document 14 Filed 07/15/16 Page 3 of 3