Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02560/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02560-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Layne Friedrich (Bar No. 195431)

Drevet Hunt (Bar No. 240487)

Lawyers for Clean Water, Inc.

1004 O’Reilly Avenue

San Francisco, California 94129

Telephone: (415) 440-6520

Facsimile: (415) 440-4155

Email: layne@lawyersforcleanwater.com

Michelle Smith (Bar No. 233515)

Humboldt Baykeeper

422 First Street Suite G

Eureka, CA 95501

Telephone: (707) 268-0665

Facsimile: (707) 268-8901

Email: michelle@humboldtbaykeeper.org

Fredric Evenson (Bar No. 198059)

Law Offices of Fredric Evenson

William Verick (Bar No. 140972)

Klamath Environmental Law Center

424 First Street

Eureka, CA 95501

Telephone: (707) 268-8900

Facsimile: (707) 268-8901

Email: ecorights@earthlink.net

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

HUMBOLDT BAYKEEPER and

ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HUMBOLDT BAYKEEPER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,

et al,

Defendants.

Civil Case No.: C 06-02560 JSW MED

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR

PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND COMPLAINT

IN RESPONSE TO COURT’S ORDER

DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD

THROUGH NINTH CAUSES OF ACTION;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Deadline to Amend: June 1, 2007

Dept: Courtroom 2

Judge: The Honorable Jeffrey S. White

Case 3:06-cv-02560-JSW Document 84 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-02560-JSW Document 91 Filed 06/01/07 Page 1 of 3
Stip and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time 1 Case No. C 06-02560 JSW MED

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs Humboldt Baykeeper and Ecological Rights Foundation (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and

Defendants Union Pacific Railroad Company, North Coast Railroad Authority, and CUE VI, LLC by

and through its counsel hereby stipulate to the following:

1. On May 16, 2007 the Court issued an Order dismissing Plaintiffs’ Third through Ninth

Causes of Action in the Second Amended Complaint (“May 16 Order”).

2. In its May 16 Order the Court required Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint to comply

with the Court’s order by June 1, 2007.

3. Plaintiffs will file a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of

Plaintiffs Third through Eighth claims in the Second Amended Complaint as soon as possible and prior

to June 1, 2007.

4. Plaintiffs believe it would save resources to allow the Court to reach a decision on Plaintiffs’

motion for leave and motion for reconsideration before requiring Plaintiffs to file an amended

complaint.

5. It is reasonable that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint shall be extended

to 10 days after the Courts’ ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration, or

the Court’s ruling on Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration, whichever is later.

DATED: May 29, 2007 Respectfully Submitted,

LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER, INC.

 /s/ 

Drevet Hunt

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Humboldt Baykeeper and

Ecological Rights Foundation

BRISCOE IVESTER & BAZEL LLP

 /s/ 

Lawrence S. Bazel

Attorneys for Defendant

Union Pacific Railroad Company

Case 3:06-cv-02560-JSW Document 84 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-02560-JSW Document 91 Filed 06/01/07 Page 2 of 3
Stip and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time 2 Case No. C 06-02560 JSW MED

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BRISCOE IVESTER & BAZEL LLP

 /s/ 

Lawrence S. Bazel

Attorneys for Defendant

CUE VI, LLC

LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER J. NEARY

 /s/ 

Christopher J. Neary

Attorney for Defendant

North Coast Railroad Authority

I, Drevet Hunt, attest that the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required

to sign this document.

Date: May 29, 2007 /s/ 

Drevet Hunt

Lawyers for Clean Water, Inc.

Attorney for Plaintiffs

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court orders the deadline for

Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint shall be extended to 10 days after the Courts’ ruling on

Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration, or its ruling on Plaintiffs motion for

reconsideration, whichever is later.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Date: _______________, 2007 _________________________________

 The Honorable Judge Jeffrey S. White

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:06-cv-02560-JSW Document 84 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 3 of 3

June 1

Case 3:06-cv-02560-JSW Document 91 Filed 06/01/07 Page 3 of 3