Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00424/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00424-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 10-cv-00424-JF-PVT 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEADLINES TO FILE OPP AND REPLY TO MOTION TO STRIKE

DM_US:23291033_1 

HOWREY LLP

JEFFREY A. MILLER (SBN 160602) 

jmiller@orrick.com 

MATTHEW J. HULT (SBN 197137) 

matthult@orrick.com 

MONTE M.F. COOPER (SBN 196746) 

mcooper@orrick.com 

SIDDHARTHA VENKATESAN (SBN 245008) 

svenkatesan@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 614-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 

ERIC J. AMDURSKY (SBN 180288) 

eamdursky@omm.com 

JUSTIN D. WALKER (SBN 252268) 

jwalker@omm.com 

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

2765 Sand Hill Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 473-2600 

Facsimile: (650) 473-2601 

DAVID S. ALMELING (SBN 235449) 

dalmeling@omm.com 

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim Defendant UPEK, Inc. 

HENRY C. BUNSOW (SBN 60707) 

bunsowh@howrey.com 

DENISE M. DE MORY (SBN 168076) 

demoryd@howrey.com 

BRIAN A.E. SMITH (SBN 188147) 

smithbrian@howrey.com 

IRENE YANG (SBN 245464) 

yangi@howrey.com 

HOWREY LLP 

525 Market Street, Suite 3600 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 848-4900 

Facsimile: (415) 848-4999 

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaim Plaintiff AUTHENTEC, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

UPEK, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AuthenTec, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

Case No. 5:10-cv-00424-JF-PVT 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES TO 

FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEF 

TO MOTION TO STRIKE [DKT. NO. 95] 

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

**E-Filed 6/10/2010**

-------------------

Case 5:10-cv-00424-JF Document 117 Filed 06/10/10 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 10-cv-00424-JF-PVT 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEADLINES TO FILE OPP AND REPLY TO MOTION TO STRIKE

-2- 

DM_US:23291033_1 

HOWREY LLP

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant UPEK, Inc. and 

Defendant/Counterclaimant AuthenTec, Inc. hereby stipulate as follows: 

On January 29, 2010, UPEK filed its original complaint seeking, among other relief, 

declaratory judgments that UPEK does not manufacture or sell any product that infringes any claims of 

U.S. Patent Nos. 6,667,439; 5,940,526; 7,505,613; 5,953,441; and 6,049,620 (Dkt. No. 1). UPEK 

further sought declaratory judgments that one or more of the claims of each of he ‘439, ‘526, ‘613, 

‘441, and ‘620 Patents are invalid (id.). AuthenTec answered UPEK’s complaint on February 2, 2010, 

and asserted multiple counterclaims, including counterclaims alleging that UPEK infringes each of the 

‘439, ‘526, ‘613, ‘441, and ‘620 Patents (Dkt. No. 5). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), UPEK filed an 

Amended Complaint on February 23, 2010, which added to its other declaratory judgment claims one 

seeking a declaration that the ‘620 Patent is unenforceable due to inequitable conduct (Dkt. No. 13). 

AuthenTec answered the Amended Complaint on March 12, 2010, and again asserted counterclaims 

alleging infringement by UPEK of each of the ‘439, ‘526, ‘613, ‘441, and ‘620 Patents (Dkt. No. 25). 

UPEK replied to those counterclaims on March 29, 2010 (Dkt. No. 43). 

On April 22, 2010, AuthenTec, Inc. filed an Answer and First Amended Counterclaims that 

dropped its counterclaims alleging infringement by UPEK of two patents, the ‘439 Patent and the ‘613 

Patent, from AuthenTec’s originally filed counterclaims and added one other patent, U.S. Patent No. 

6,259,804 (Dkt. No. 74). Yang Declaration, ¶ 2. On April 27, 2010, UPEK filed a Motion to Strike 

AuthenTec’s Answer and First Amended Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 95). Id. AuthenTec’s Opposition 

Brief to UPEK’s Motion to Strike is scheduled to be filed today, June 4, 2010, and UPEK’s Reply 

Brief is scheduled to be filed on June 11, 2010. Id. The Motion to Strike is scheduled for hearing on 

June 25, 2010. See Dkt. No. 95. 

On May 28, 2010, the parties attended a Case Management Conference with the Court, at 

which the Court indicated that it would hold a Markman hearing in October 2010. Yang Declaration, ¶ 

3. The parties are in the process of negotiating a resolution to UPEK’s Motion to Strike. Id. ¶ 4. 

Case 5:10-cv-00424-JF Document 117 Filed 06/10/10 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 10-cv-00424-JF-PVT 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEADLINES TO FILE OPP AND REPLY TO MOTION TO STRIKE

-3- 

DM_US:23291033_1 

HOWREY LLP

 UPEK and AuthenTec hereby stipulate that AuthenTec’s Opposition Brief to UPEK’s Motion 

to Strike shall be filed, if necessary, on June 9, 2010, and UPEK’s Reply Brief shall be filed, if 

necessary, on June 16, 2010. See Yang Declaration, ¶ 6. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 4, 2010 HOWREY LLP 

By: /s/ Irene Yang

Irene Yang 

Attorneys for Defendant / Counterclaimant 

AUTHENTEC, INC. 

Dated: June 4, 2010 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Miller

Jeffrey A. Miller 

Attorneys for Plaintiff / Counterclaim 

Defendant 

UPEK, Inc. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:_________________________ 

 

HON. Jeremy Fogel 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

6/7/2010

Case 5:10-cv-00424-JF Document 117 Filed 06/10/10 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 10-cv-00424-JF-PVT 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEADLINES TO FILE OPP AND REPLY TO MOTION TO STRIKE

DM_US:22889284_1

HOWREY LLP

CERTIFICATION BY IRENE YANG PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE NO. 45, SECTION 

X. RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California, and am an associate 

in the law firm of Howrey LLP, counsel for Defendant/Counterclaimant AuthenTec, Inc. The 

statements herein are made on my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness I could and would 

testify thereto. 

2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that concurrence 

has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared document with the 

Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for 

subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party until one 

year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct on June 4, 2010. 

 /s/ Irene Yang

Irene Yang 

Case 5:10-cv-00424-JF Document 117 Filed 06/10/10 Page 4 of 4