Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02898/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02898-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

THUAN KHUC, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PENINSULAR INVESTMENTS, INC., et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-02898-BLF 

ORDER STRIKING NOTICE OF NEW

EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

[Re: ECF 74]

On July 14, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a “notice of new evidence in opposition to Defendants’ 

motion to dismiss.” ECF 74. Briefing closed on Defendants’ motion to dismiss with the filing of 

Defendants’ reply brief on May 24, 2016. The civil local rules do not contain any provision for 

the filing of a “notice of new evidence.” Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Plaintiffs’ filing and 

reminds the parties that all filings must comply with this Court’s standing orders, the local rules, 

and the federal rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 18, 2016

 ______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-02898-BLF Document 75 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 1