Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01606/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01606-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1606

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, United States Attorney General; ROD J. 

ROSENSTEIN, Maryland U.S. Attorney, Department of Justice, 

et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. 

(1:15-cv-01311-GLR)

Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1606 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order granting her leave to proceed in forma pauperis, 

denying her motion to amend her complaint, and ordering her to 

show cause why she should not be enjoined from instituting new 

filings. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). The order Randolph seeks to appeal is neither a 

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 15-1606 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2