Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04479/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04479-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

Case No. 09-CV-04479-JSW STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DATE 

FOR DELL TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

@Zcc^\Vc( :ZccZii $ <dgbVc aae 

aVlnZgh 

adh Vc\ZaZh( XVa^[dgc^V 

HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

RODERICK G. DORMAN (SBN 96908) 

dormanr@hbdlawyers.com 

ALAN P. BLOCK (SBN 143783) 

blocka@hbdlawyers.com 

MARC MORRIS (SBN 183728) 

morrism@hbdlawyers.com 

865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2900 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (213) 694-1200 

Fax: (213) 694-1234 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SPEEDTRACK, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SPEEDTRACK, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AMAZON.COM, INC.; COSTCO 

WHOLESALE CORPORATION; 1-800-

FLOWERS.COM, INC.; 

BARNESANDNOBLE.COM, LLC; 

BARNESANDNOBLE.COM, INC.; THE 

HOME DEPOT, INC.; NIKE, INC.; 

NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT 

CATALOG CO., INC.; J & R ELECTRONICS, 

INC.; DELL, INC.; BEST BUY CO.; BEST 

BUY.COM, LLC; SYSTEMAX, INC.; 

OFFICEMAX, INC.; MACY’S, INC.; 

MACYS.COM, INC.; DELL, INC.; 

RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT, INC.; VALUE 

VISION INTERNATIONAL, INC., DBA 

SHOPNBC.COM; B &H FOTO & 

ELECTRONICS CORP.; HEWLETTPACKARD COMPANY; REDCATS USA, 

INC.; RETAIL CONVERGENCE, INC., DBA 

SMARTBARGAINS.COM, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 09-CV-04479-JSW 

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT DELL, INC. TO 

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE 

RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 

[CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2] 

Case3:09-cv-04479-JSW Document21 Filed10/19/09 Page1 of 8

AND ORDER THEREON

Case 4:09-cv-04479-JSW Document 23 Filed 10/20/09 Page 1 of 4
-1- 

Case No. 09-CV-04479-JSW STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DATE 

FOR DELL TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

@Zcc^\Vc( :ZccZii $ <dgbVc aae 

aVlnZgh 

adh Vc\ZaZh( XVa^[dgc^V 

WHEREAS Plaintiff SpeedTrack, Inc. (“SpeedTrack”) has served its Complaint on 

Defendant Dell, Inc. (“Dell”) on October 1, 2009; 

WHEREAS the Plaintiff asserts that date on which Dell would be required to respond to 

SpeedTrack’s Complaint is October 21, 2009; 

WHEREAS Dell has requested an extension of time to respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint; 

and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff SpeedTrack, Inc. filed this action for infringement of SpeedTrack’s 

U.S. Patent No. 5,544,360 (“the ‘360 patent”) on September 23, 2009; 

WHEREAS, SpeedTrack previously filed the case of SpeedTrack, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, 

Inc., et. al., Case No. 06-CV-07336-PJH (“the Wal-Mart Action”) for infringement of the ‘360 

patent on November 29, 2006; 

WHEREAS, SpeedTrack previously filed another action, SpeedTrack, Inc. v. Office Depot, 

Inc., et. al., Case No. 07-CV-03602-PJH (“the Office Depot Action”), also for infringement of the 

‘360 patent, on July 12, 2007; 

WHEREAS, on October 10, 2007, the Court granted the Defendants’ motion to stay the 

Office Depot Action pending the resolution of the Wal-Mart Action and, whereas, the Office Depot 

Action is currently stayed; 

WHEREAS, on January 12, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted the 

Request for Reexamination of the ‘360 patent filed by Endeca Technologies, Inc.; 

WHEREAS, on February 5, 2009, the Court granted the Defendants’ motion to stay the WalMart Action pending the resolution of the reexamination of the ‘360 patent and, whereas the WalMart Action is currently stayed; 

WHEREAS, in view of the above-recited circumstances, SpeedTrack has proposed to each 

named Defendant in this action a stipulation to stay this litigation pending the resolution of both the 

reexamination of the ‘360 patent-in-suit and the trial and/or final resolution in the trial court of the 

Wal-Mart Action; 

WHEREAS Dell is agreeable to a stipulation to stay this litigation pending the resolution of 

Case 4:09-cv-04479-JSW Document 23 Filed 10/20/09 Page 2 of 4 Case3:09-cv-04479-JSW Document21 Filed10/19/09 Page2 of 8
-2- 

Case No. 09-CV-04479-EDL STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DATE 

FOR DELL TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

@Zcc^\Vc( :ZccZii $ <dgbVc aae 

aVlnZgh 

adh Vc\ZaZh( XVa^[dgc^V 

both the reexamination of the ‘360 patent-in-suit and the trial and/or final resolution in the trial court 

of the Wal-Mart Action; 

WHEREAS SpeedTrack represents that it will file a motion to stay this action pending the 

resolution of both the reexamination of the ‘360 patent-in-suit and the trial and/or final resolution in 

the trial court of the Wal-Mart Action if a stipulation to stay cannot be reached with each named 

Defendant in this action, and Dell represents that it will not oppose such a motion; 

WHEREAS Dell’s request for an extension is not made for the purpose of delay; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through 

their respective counsel of record, THAT: 

The date by which Dell must answer or otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint shall 

be extended as follows: If the Court grants a stay of this litigation, then Dell shall have 20 days to 

answer or otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint from the date of the Court’s order lifting 

the stay. If the Court denies the request to stay or denies a motion for a stay, then Dell shall have 20 

days to answer or otherwise respond from the date of the Court’s order. 

SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: October 19, 2009 HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP 

By /S/ Alan P. Block 

Roderick G. Dorman 

Alan P. Block 

Marc Morris 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, SPEEDTRACK, INC. 

DATED: October 19, 2009 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 

By /S/ Eugene Y. Mar 

Roderick M. Thompson 

Andrew Leibnitz 

Eugene Y. Mar 

Attorneys for Defendant, DELL.COM, INC. 

Case 4:09-cv-04479-JSW Document 23 Filed 10/20/09 Page 3 of 4 Case3:09-cv-04479-JSW Document21 Filed10/19/09 Page3 of 8
-3- 

Case No. 09-CV-04479-EDL STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DATE 

FOR DELL TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

@Zcc^\Vc( :ZccZii $ <dgbVc aae 

aVlnZgh 

adh Vc\ZaZh( XVa^[dgc^V 

ORDER

The date by which Dell must answer or otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint shall 

be extended as follows: If the Court grants a stay of this litigation, then Dell shall have 20 days to 

answer or otherwise respond to SpeedTrack’s Complaint from the date of the Court’s order lifting 

the stay. If the Court denies the request to stay or denies a motion for a stay, then Dell shall have 20 

days to answer or otherwise respond from the date of the Court’s order. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

The Honorable Jeffrey White 

United States District Court Judge 

Case3:09-cv-04479-JSW Document21 Filed10/19/09 Page4 of 8

October 20, 2009

Case 4:09-cv-04479-JSW Document 23 Filed 10/20/09 Page 4 of 4