Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06013/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06013-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODNEY JOHNSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

G. J. GIURBINO, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:03-cv-06013-LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

(Doc. 28)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 29, 2007, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendation recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED on the

merits. (Doc. 28). The Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained

notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. 

To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 

Case 1:03-cv-06013-LJO -TAG Document 29 Filed 09/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued August 29, 2007 (Doc. 28), is ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06013-LJO -TAG Document 29 Filed 09/26/07 Page 2 of 2