Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-01268/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-01268-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST 

Michael W. De Vries (S.B.N. 211001) 

Sharre Lotfollahi (S.B.N. 258913) 

Benjamin A. Herbert (S.B.N. 277356) 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

333 South Hope Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 680-8400 

Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 

Email: michael.devries@kirkland.com 

Email: sharre.lotfollahi@kirkland.com 

Email: benjamin.herbert@kirkland.com 

Adam R. Alper (S.B.N. 196834) 

James W. Beard (S.B.N. 267242) 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 439-1400 

Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 

Email: adam.alper@kirkland.com 

Email: james.beard@kirkland.com 

Joshua L. Simmons (admitted pro hac vice) 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

601 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022-4611 

Telephone: (212) 446-4800 

Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 

Email: joshua.simmons@kirkland.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff LivePerson, Inc. 

Darin W. Snyder (S.B.N. 136003) 

Mark E. Miller (S.B.N. 130200) 

Geoffrey H. Yost (S.B.N. 159687) 

Alexander B. Parker (S.B.N. 264705) 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Email: dsynder@omm.com 

Email: markmiller@omm.com 

Email: gyost@omm.com 

Email: aparker@omm.com 

Attorneys for Defendant [24]7.ai, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LivePerson, Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

[24]7.ai, Inc., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:17-CV-01268-JST 

STIPULATED MOTION TO ENLARGE 

TIME TO COMPLETE SUPPLEMENTAL 

EXPERT DISCOVERY 

Case 3:17-cv-01268-JST Document 502 Filed 12/03/18 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 1 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff LivePerson, Inc. (“LivePerson”) and Defendant [24]7.ai, 

Inc. (“[24]7”, and collectively with LivePerson, “the Parties”), subject to the Court’s approval and 

Order, stipulate to enlarge time for the Parties to serve supplemental expert reports and complete 

associated expert depositions. The Parties seek this enlargement in order to allow the Parties to 

evaluate and conference regarding the Court’s Order Regarding Motions to Exclude Expert 

Testimony, issued earlier today, November 30, 2018 without prejudice to either or both Parties 

seeking further relief if appropriate or to taking any positions with respect thereto. 

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 

On October 26, 2018, based on a determination that the decision in E.J. Brooks Company v. 

Cambridge Security Seals, 31 N.Y.3d 441 (2018) was a change in law and in response to 

LivePerson’s request, this Court “grant[ed] LivePerson’s request to allow Dr. Choi to supplement his 

report.” ECF 484 at 29. In accordance with that determination, the parties subsequently submitted a 

stipulation that included deadlines for service of that supplemental report, for service of a rebuttal 

report, and to complete additional depositions on those reports, which was entered as an order by the 

Court. ECF 491. That stipulated order set Tuesday, December 4, 2018 as the deadline for 

LivePerson to serve a supplemental report from Dr. Choi, January 15, 2019 as the deadline to serve a 

rebuttal report, and January 25, 2019 as the deadline to complete associated depositions. Id. 

Earlier today, November 30, 2018, the Court issued an order granting [24]7’s Motion to 

Exclude Certain Testimony of Dr. William Choi. ECF 498 (“Daubert Order”). Given the pending 

deadline for service of Dr. Choi’s supplemental expert report, the Parties met and conferred on 

November 30, 2018 regarding a brief extension of the supplemental report deadlines in order to 

permit the Parties to evaluate and conference regarding the Court’s Daubert Order. See L.R. 37-1. 

The Parties agreed on a one-week extension of those deadlines, subject to the Court’s approval, 

without prejudice to either or both Parties seeking further relief if appropriate or to taking any 

positions with respect thereto. 

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE 

The Parties now stipulate to the request to enlarge time, as set forth below: 

Case 3:17-cv-01268-JST Document 502 Filed 12/03/18 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 2 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST 

Event Current Deadline1 Proposed Deadline 

Choi supplemental report December 4, 2018 December 11, 2018 

Stuckwisch supplemental report January 15, 2018 January 22, 2018 

Completion of further depositions on 

supplemental reports 

January 25, 2019 February 1, 2019 

The Parties make this Stipulation without prejudice to requests for further relief or to either 

or both Parties’ positions with respect to the Court’s Daubert Order. For the foregoing reasons, the 

Parties respectfully request this Court grant this stipulated motion to enlarge time for supplemental 

expert discovery as set forth above in accordance with this stipulation. 

Dated: November 30, 2018 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

By: /s/ Michael W. De Vries 

Michael W. De Vries 

Attorney for 

LIVEPERSON, INC. 

Dated: November 30, 2018 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Darin W. Snyder 

Darin W. Snyder 

Attorney for 

[24]7.AI, INC. 

 

1

 ECF 491. 

Case 3:17-cv-01268-JST Document 502 Filed 12/03/18 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 3 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-01268-JST 

ATTESTATION 

 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from Darin W. Snyder. 

/s/ Michael W. De Vries 

Michael W. De Vries 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________________ _____________________________ 

 Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

 United States District Judge 

December 3, 2018

Case 3:17-cv-01268-JST Document 502 Filed 12/03/18 Page 4 of 4