Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03383/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03383-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSICA BATES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-3383 SI

ORDER CLARIFYING SUMMARY

JUDGMENT ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS

SPAFFORD AND STRIBLING-USS’

STATE LAW CLAIMS

The Court has received defendants’ April 2, 2008 letter seeking clarification regarding the

summary judgment order. By order filed March 26, 2008, the Court granted in part and denied in part

defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In that order, the Court held, inter alia, that defendants are

entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs Spafford and Stribling-Uss’ state law claims because those

plaintiffs failed to file state tort claims. The Court then incorrectly stated, in the conclusion section of

the order, that Spafford and Stribling-Uss’ claims under the Bane Act survived summary judgment. This

order clarifies that the Court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant on all of Spafford and

Stribling-Uss’ state law claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 7, 2008 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03383-SI Document 114 Filed 04/07/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case 3:05-cv-03383-SI Document 114 Filed 04/07/08 Page 2 of 2