Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-6_05-cv-06045/USCOURTS-arwd-6_05-cv-06045-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HOT SPRINGS DIVISION

PHYLLIS & G.W. DELANEY PLAINTIFFS

V. Civil No. 05-6045

GARY ASHCRAFT, et al. DEFENDANTS

O R D E R

Now on this 17th day of May 2006, there comes on for

consideration the report and recommendation issued by the Honorable

Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas. (Doc. 216). Separate Defendants City of Hot

Springs, Arkansas, Gary Ashcraft and Paul Norris filed written

objections (Docs. 223-24). 

The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and

sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and

recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its

entirety. 

Accordingly, Separate Defendants’ motion for judgment on the

pleadings (Doc. 178) is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs’ claims

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1986 and state law claims of

slander, false arrest and/or false imprisonment and assault and

battery and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Separate

Defendants’ Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiffs’ claims

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and state law claims of

malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress

and abuse of process.

 

Case 6:05-cv-06045-RTD Document 226 Filed 05/17/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Robert T. Dawson

Honorable Robert T. Dawson

United States District Judge

Case 6:05-cv-06045-RTD Document 226 Filed 05/17/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>