Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00549/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00549-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

10858/0004/790068.1 Stipulation for Enlargement of Time

Case No.: CV 10-00549 EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)

mdl@severson.com

REGINA J. McCLENDON (State Bar No. 184669)

rjm@severson.com

ERIK KEMP (State Bar No. 246196)

ek@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-3344

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439

Attorneys for Defendant

CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE MORRISON, ERLINDA DEL 

ROSARIO, MARIE DEL ROSARIO,

individually, and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION; 

and DOES 1 through 50,

Defendants.

Case No.: CV 10-00549 EMC

STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Civil Local Rule 6-1(a)

Complaint Filed: December 8, 2009

WHEREAS, plaintiff Andre Morrison filed the above-entitled action on December 8, 2009, 

in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Alameda, which named 

Credit Acceptance Corporation as a defendant;

WHEREAS, Morrison, Erlinda Del Rosario, and Marie Del Rosario filed a first amended 

complaint against Credit Acceptance on January 13, 2010, also in the Alameda County Superior 

Court;

WHEREAS, Credit Acceptance removed the action to this Court on February 8, 2010, 

making its deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint 

February 16, 2010;

Case 4:10-cv-00549-PJH Document 6 Filed 02/17/10 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

10858/0004/790068.1 Stipulation for Enlargement of Time

Case No.: CV 10-00549 EMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Local Rule 6-1(a) of the United States District Court for the Northern District 

of California provides that the parties may stipulate to extend the time for responding to a 

complaint without leave of Court; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and Credit 

Acceptance, on the other, through their respective counsel of record herein, that Credit Acceptance

may have an extension of time to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ first amended 

complaint to and including March 18, 2010.

This extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by 

Court order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: February 12, 2010 SEVERSON & WERSON

A Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Erik Kemp

Erik Kemp

Attorneys for Defendant

CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

I, Erik Kemp, am the ecf user whose 

identification and password are being used to 

file this document. I hereby attest that 

Bryan Kemnitzer has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Erik Kemp

Erik Kemp

DATED: February 12, 2010 KEMNITZER, BARRON & KRIEG LLP

By: /s/ Bryan Kemnitzer

Bryan Kemnitzer

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ANDRE MORRISON, ERLINDA DEL 

ROSARIO, and MARIE DEL ROSARIO

Case 4:10-cv-00549-PJH Document 6 Filed 02/17/10 Page 2 of 2