Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02554/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02554-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY LYNN NORWOOD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S- 03-2554 DFL GGH P

vs.

EDWARD ALAMEIDA, JR., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983. The parties were granted an extension of time until November 21, 2005 to conduct

discovery because an additional defendant had been named in the second amended complaint

who had not yet been served. See Order filed on August 30, 2005. On October 6, 2005, the

court directed the U.S. Marshal to serve defendant Cheryl Pliler. On October 14, 2005, plaintiff

requested a 60-day extension of time for the discovery deadline from the date she is served so

that he may serve his discovery requests upon her, allowing 45 days for a response and an

additional 15 days for the filing of any motion to compel discovery. Plaintiff also seeks a copy

of the May 17, 2005 scheduling order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff is granted 60 days from the date defendant Pliler is served to file a

Case 2:03-cv-02554-GEB -GGH Document 36 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

motion to compel discovery with respect to defendant Pliler only; the same cut-off applies with

respect to defendant Pliler seeking discovery from plaintiff; the November 21, 2005 deadline

remains in place with respect to any motion to compel discovery plaintiff may choose to file with

respect to any other defendant or with respect to any motion to compel brought by any defendant

but defendant Pliler;

2. On this occasion only, the court will order the Clerk of the Court to re-serve

plaintiff with a copy of the May 17, 2005 scheduling order. In future, plaintiff must comply with

the Clerk’s Office procedures to obtain copies.

DATED: 10/24/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

norw2554.eot

Case 2:03-cv-02554-GEB -GGH Document 36 Filed 10/25/05 Page 2 of 2