Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00297/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00297-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 355
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING APPLICATION 

FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT 

143630V2 CASE NO. 07CV00297-LJO-SMS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTHONY YOUNG and SOMJAI YOUNG, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY; JOSEPH ADAM 

RIOS; and DOES 1 to 100 inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 07cv00297-LJO-SMS 

ORDER REGARDING APPLICATION FOR 

DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH 

SETTLEMENT 

This application of FORD MOTOR COMPANY for an order determining the settlement with 

ANTHONY AND SOMJAI YOUNG was found to be in good faith pursuant to California Code of 

Civil Procedure section 877.6(a)(2), and for an order barring all claims, having come before the 

Court, the Court finds that: 

1. Proper notice of settlement has been given to all parties in actions involving Mr. 

Young; and 

2. No oppositions contesting the good faith settlement have been timely filed. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 

1. That the settlement between FORD MOTOR COMPANY and ANTHONY AND 

SOMJAI YOUNG is in good faith pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6 et 

seq. 

Case 1:07-cv-00297-LJO -SMS Document 65 Filed 09/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2 

PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING APPLICATION 

FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT 

143630V2 CASE NO. 07CV00297-LJO-SMS 

2. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6(c), the determination by 

the Court that the settlement was made in good faith shall bar any other joint tortfeasor or co-obligor 

from any further claims against the settling tortfeasor or co-obligor for equitable comparative 

contribution, or partial or comparative indemnity, based on comparative negligence or comparative 

fault. 

Dated: __September 4, 2008___________ /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

HONORABLE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Case 1:07-cv-00297-LJO -SMS Document 65 Filed 09/04/08 Page 2 of 2