Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-2_09-cv-00009/USCOURTS-ared-2_09-cv-00009-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

 Defendants raise several objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendations that may (or

may not) prove meritorious. However, as noted by the Magistrate Judge, the denial of defendants’ motion for summary

judgment is without prejudice to its refiling upon further development of the record. In this respect, the defendants may,

consistent with the applicable rules, set forth their objections and any other arguments in their refiled motion for summary

judgment.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HELENA DIVISION

BRENT M. BARBER

Reg. # 17455-045 PLAINTIFF

V. 2:09-cv-00009 SWW-JJV

USA; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS;

OUTLAW, Warden, FCI-Forrest City; THOMAS, Lt.,

FCI-Forrest City; KIMBLE, Unit Manager, FCI-Forrest

City; MILLER, Correctional Counselor, FCI-Forrest City;

RENDON, Case Manager, FCI-Forrest City; and JOHN

DOES, Unknown Health Services Administrator and 

Physician, FCI-Forrest City DEFENDANTS

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition

submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the parties’ objections. After

carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the

Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and

hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.

29) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. No. 33) for the appointment of

Case 2:09-cv-00009-SWW Document 45 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 2
counsel and his request for reconsideration (Doc. No. 32) are DENIED, and that this matter shall

be set for a pre-jury evidentiary hearing by separate Order.

DATED this 4th day of January, 2010.

/s/Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:09-cv-00009-SWW Document 45 Filed 01/04/10 Page 2 of 2