Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00861/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00861-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

Moon v. Colvin, 2:14-cv-00861- AC – Jt. Stip. Remand 1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

Acting United States Attorney 

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, CSBN# 6191786 

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

Social Security Administration 

RICHARD M. RODRIGUEZ 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

160 Spear Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 977-8926 

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 

E-Mail: richard.rodriguez@ssa.gov 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

ANDY ALLEN MOON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:14-CV-00861-AC 

STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY 

REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE 

FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO 

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Andy Allen Moon, and 

Defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant) through 

their respective counsel of record, and with the approval of the Court, that the Commissioner of 

Social Security has agreed to a voluntary remand of this case for further administrative action 

pursuant to 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. section 405(g) sentence four. 

Upon remand, the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review’s Appeal Council will 

remand this case to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for a new hearing and decision. 

The Appeals Council will instruct the ALJ to reassess the credibility of Plaintiff’s 

Case 2:14-cv-00861-AC Document 21 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 2
Moon v. Colvin, 2:14-cv-00861- AC – Jt. Stip. Remand 2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

subjective complaints consistent with the applicable regulations, Social Security Rulings, and 

Ninth Circuit case law. 

The Appeals Council will also instruct the ALJ to reassess Plaintiff’s residual functional 

capacity, and determine whether Plaintiff could perform any other work existing in significant 

numbers in the national economy given his age, education, vocational factors, and residual 

functional capacity. 

The parties’ further request the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment in 

favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

Date: May 18, 2016 /s/Robert C. Weems 

 Robert C. Weems, CSBN 148156 

 Attorney at Law 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 *By email authorization on May 17, 2016 

Date: May 18, 2016 PHILLIP A. TALBERT 

 Acting United States Attorney 

 

 By: /s/Richard M. Rodriguez 

 Richard M. Rodriguez 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

ORDER 

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 

DATED: May 19, 2016 

Case 2:14-cv-00861-AC Document 21 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 2