Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00420/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00420-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Keith Duane Arline, Jr. is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 4, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 

Recommendations which was served on the parties and contained notice that objections to the 

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day time frame has 

expired and no objections were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on May 4, 2016, is adopted in full; and

2. Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 10, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

KEITH DUANE ARLINE, JR.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KEN CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:11-cv-00420-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 

THE PLEADINGS

[ECF Nos. 45, 52]

Case 1:11-cv-00420-LJO-SAB Document 54 Filed 06/13/16 Page 1 of 1