Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-05107/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-05107-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARCADIO G. NAVARRO,

Petitioner,

 v.

ALBERTO R. GONZALEZ, et al.,

Respondents. /

No. C 05-05107 TEH

ORDER RE MOTION TO ACCEPT

LATE RESPONSE 

The Court is in receipt of Petitioner’s “Unopposed Motion to Accept Late response to

Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss.” The motion is unnecessary because Respondent’s

opposition is not late. Respondent noticed its motion to dismiss for March 13, 2006. 

Accordingly, Petitioner’s opposition is not due until three weeks prior, or February 20, 2006. 

Respondent’s reply is due February 27, 2006. The January 30, 2006 deadline referred to by

Petitioner was only in effect if Respondent filed an response to Petitioner’s petition instead of a

motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the Court accepts Petitioner’s opposition but denies the

motion as unnecessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 21, 2006 

THELTON E. HENDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05107-TEH Document 9 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 1