Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00728/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00728-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY RESPONSES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOUGLAS R. THORN (CA Bar No. 133521) 

dthorn@akk-law.com

J. SCOTT SMITH (CA Bar No. 151163) 

jsmith@akk-law.com

CORI R. SARNO (CA Bar No. 230559) 

csarno@akk-law.com

Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff 

601 University Avenue, Suite 150 

Sacramento, California 95825 

Telephone – (916) 564-6100 

Facsimile – (916) 564-6263 

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF OROVILLE, 

LIZ EHRENSTROM, SHARON ATTEBERRY, 

ERIC TEITELMAN and PAT GRIFFIN-CLARK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID NOEL, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITY OF OROVILLE, LIZ 

EHRENSTROM, SHARON 

ATTEBERRY, ERIC TEITELMAN and 

DOES 1 through 1000, INCLUSIVE, 

Defendants. 

Consolidated Case No. 2:07-CV-00728 WBS KJM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY REQUESTS 

CHRISTINE LASIK, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITY OF OROVILLE, PAT GRIFFINCLARK, LIZ EHRENSTROM, SHARON 

ATTEBERRY, ERIC TEITELMAN and 

DOES 1 through 1000, INCLUSIVE, 

 Defendants. 

 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

Case 2:07-cv-00728-WBS -KJM Document 69 Filed 05/08/08 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY RESPONSES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows: 

1. Defendant City of Oroville propounded the following discovery to Plaintiff David Noel: 

DISCOVERY DATE SERVED DATE DUE 

Interrogatories (Set One) March 26, 2008 April 28, 2008 

Requests for Documents (Set One) March 26, 2008 April 28, 2008 

Request for Admission (Set One) March 31, 2008 May 5, 2008 

Interrogatories (Set Two) April 18, 2008 May 21, 2008 

Request for Admission (Set Two) April 18, 2008 May 21, 2008 

Requests for Admission (Set Three) April 23, 2008 May 27, 2008 

The parties stipulate and agree that Plaintiff David Noel shall respond to the discovery 

propounded to him by Defendant City of Oroville in compliance with all of the instructions set forth in 

the discovery requests and in accordance with all of the other requirements of law in accordance with 

the following schedule: 

DISCOVERY DATE DUE

Interrogatories (Set One) May 27, 2008 

Requests for Documents (Set One) May 27, 2008 

Request for Admission (Set One) May 27, 2008 

Interrogatories (Set Two) May 27, 2008 

Request for Admission (Set Two) May 27, 2008 

Requests for Admission (Set Three) May 27, 2008 

The discovery responses shall be served on counsel for Defendant City of Oroville via first-class 

mail and via email, except that the documents produced by Plaintiff David Noel pursuant to the 

Requests for Documents shall be served via first-class mail only. 

2. Defendant City of Oroville propounded the following discovery to Plaintiff Christine 

Lasik: 

DISCOVERY DATE SERVED DATE DUE 

Interrogatories (Set One) March 26, 2008 April 28, 2008 

Requests for Documents (Set One) March 26, 2008 April 28, 2008 

Case 2:07-cv-00728-WBS -KJM Document 69 Filed 05/08/08 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY RESPONSES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Request for Admission (Set One) April 24, 2008 May 28, 2008 

The parties stipulate and agree that Plaintiff Christine Lasik shall respond to the discovery 

propounded to her by Defendant City of Oroville in compliance with all of the instructions set forth in 

the discovery requests and in accordance with all of the other requirements of law in accordance with 

the following schedule: 

DISCOVERY DATE DUE

Interrogatories (Set One) June 6, 2008 

Requests for Documents (Set One) June 6, 2008 

Request for Admission (Set One) June 6, 2008 

The discovery responses shall be served on counsel for Defendant City of Oroville via first-class 

mail and via email, except that the documents produced by Plaintiff Christine Lasik pursuant to the 

Requests for Documents shall be served via first-class mail only. 

3. No other requests for extension shall be made or authorized. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Date: /s/ K. Stephen Swenson 

K. Stephen Swenson 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF 

Date: /s/ Douglas R. Thorn 

Douglas R. Thorn 

J. Scott Smith 

Cori R. Sarno 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 2:07-cv-00728-WBS -KJM Document 69 Filed 05/08/08 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY RESPONSES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The Court has considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, 

hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties as an order of the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 7, 2008. 

Case 2:07-cv-00728-WBS -KJM Document 69 Filed 05/08/08 Page 4 of 4