Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01507/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01507-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Joint Proposed] Order Re Discovery 

Dispute 

Case No. C 05-01507 WHA

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

David Eiseman (Cal. Bar No. 114758) 

davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com

Albert P. Bedecarre (Cal. Bar No. 148178) 

albedecarre@quinnemanuel.com

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SILICONIX INCORPORATED

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

Brent Caslin (Cal. Bar No. 198682) 

bcaslin@kirkland.com

Nick Saros (Cal. Bar No. 209922) 

nsaros@kirkland.com

Chris Almand (Cal. Bar No. 222755 ) 

calmand@kirkland.com

777 South Figueroa Street, Floor 37 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (213) 680-8400 

Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

William A. Streff, Jr. (Ill. Bar No. 2753979) 

wstreff@kirkland.com

Paul R. Steadman (pro hac vice) 

psteadman@kirkland.com

Tomoko Itoga (Cal. Bar No. 207097) 

titoga@kirkland.com

200 East Randolph Drive 

Chicago, Illinois 60601-6636 

Telephone: (312) 861-2000 

Facsimile: (312) 861-2200 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants DENSO 

CORPORATION and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SILICONIX INCORPORATED, a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DENSO CORPORATION, a Japanese 

corporation, and TD SCAN (U.S.A.), INC., a 

Michigan corporation, 

 Defendants. 

_______________________________________

AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS 

Nos. C 04-00344 WHA and C 05-03617 WHA. 

Case No.C 05-01507 WHA 

[JOINT PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 119 Filed 06/09/2006 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 120 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Joint Proposed] Order Re Discovery 

Dispute

-2- Case No. C 05-01507 WHA

A discovery dispute between Siliconix, inc., DENSO Corporation, and TD Scan (U.S.A.), 

Inc. was addressed by the Court on June 8, 2006. The Court, having considered the parties’ papers, 

their arguments, and the evidence relating to the dispute, rules as follows: 

1. Siliconix shall produce electronic documents on or before June 16, 2005. 

2. Siliconix shall produce its Supplemental Order Paragraph 14 document search 

disclosure on or before June 16, 2006. TD Scan shall update its disclosure by the same date. 

3. If there is a good faith basis for reopening a deposition due to the late production of 

documents by Siliconix, at the request of DENSO or TD SCAN, Siliconix must re-produce each 

deponent under its control or represented by its counsel for further deposition examination as to any 

new materials produced that are germane to that deponent and must bear the expense of doing so. 

4. If, at the close of discovery, DENSO or TD SCAN have a good faith belief that 

Siliconix’s document production is incomplete, they may depose up to five individuals to inquire 

into Siliconix’s document search and production at the expense of Siliconix. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June ___, 2006 

The Honorable William H. Alsup 

United States District Judge 

Proposed order jointly submitted by: 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

By: /s/ David Eiseman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff SILICONIX 

INCORPORATED 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

By: /s/ Brent Caslin 

Attorney for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

DENSO CORPORATION and TD SCAN 

(U.S.A.), Inc. 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 119 Filed 06/09/2006 Page 2 of 4

12

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 120 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Joint Proposed] Order Re Discovery 

Dispute

-3- Case No. C 05-01507 WHA

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 

and not a party to the within action. My business address is Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 777 South 

Figueroa Street, Suite 3400, Los Angeles, California 90017. 

On June 9, 2006, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: [JOINT PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE on the interested parties in this action by placing true copies 

thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as set forth on the attached service list: 

[Electronic Mail] By sending the document(s) listed above via e-mail as an 

attachment in 'pdf' format to the person(s) at the e-mail address(es) set forth below. 

Chris Scott Graham, Esq. 

chris.scott.graham@dechert.com Justin F. Boyce, Esq. 

justin.boyce@dechert.com

Dechert, LLP 

1117 California Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: 650-813-4800 

Fax: 650-813-4848 

Attorneys for Advanced Analogic 

Technologies 

Peter Chen, Esq. 

pchen@mwe.com

Bijal V. Vakil, Esq. 

bvakil@mwe.com

McDermott Will & Emery 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: 650-813-5088 

Fax: 650-813-5100 

Attorneys for Panasonic Corporation of 

North America 

David Eiseman, Esq. 

davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com

Albert P. Bedecarré, Esq. 

albedecarre@quinnemanuel.com

Diane M. Doolittle, Esq. 

dianedoolittle@quinnemanuel.com

Aaron N. Monick, Esq. 

aaronmonick@quinnemanuel.com

Carl G. Anderson, Esq. 

carlanderson@quinnemanuel.com

Emily C. O'Brien, Esq. 

emilyobrien@quinnemanuel.com

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver 

 & Hedges, LLP 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415-875-6600 

Fax: 415-875-6700 

Attorneys for Siliconix, Inc. 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 119 Filed 06/09/2006 Page 3 of 4
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 120 Filed 06/12/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Joint Proposed] Order Re Discovery 

Dispute

-4- Case No. C 05-01507 WHA

[Federal] I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this 

court at whose direction the service was made. 

Executed June 9, 2006, at Los Angeles, California. 

/s/ MARIO A. AGUILLON JR. 

Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 119 Filed 06/09/2006 Page 4 of 4
 Case 3:05-cv-01507-WHA Document 120 Filed 06/12/06 Page 4 of 4