Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02409/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02409-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIRECTV INC.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2409 EJG GGH PS

vs.

JACK TURNBOUGH,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed March 25, 2005, defendant was ordered to show cause, within ten

days, why his answer should not be stricken and judgment entered for plaintiff. The ten day

period has now expired, and defendant has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s

order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the defendant’s answer be stricken, and

judgment be entered for plaintiff.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:04-cv-02409-GEB-GGH Document 14 Filed 05/04/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 5/3/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

directv2409.fsc

Case 2:04-cv-02409-GEB-GGH Document 14 Filed 05/04/05 Page 2 of 2