Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02653/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02653-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re Change In Briefing Schedule, etc. Case No. C06-02653 MJJ 

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JACOB APPELSMITH

Senior Assistant Attorney General

FIEL D. TIGNO

MIGUEL A. NERI

Supervising Deputy Attorneys General

MARJORIE E. COX, State Bar No. 084536

Deputy Attorney General

 1515 Clay Street, Suite 2000

 P.O. Box 70550

 Oakland, CA 94612-0550

Telephone: (510) 622-2148

Facsimile: (510) 622-2121

Email: Marjorie.Cox@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

JERRY R. JOLLY, Director

California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTHING TO IT!!!, LLC, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

JERRY R. JOLLY, Director of the California

Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control,

Defendant.

Case No.: C06-02653 EDL

STIPULATION AND

ALTERNATIVE [PROPOSED]

ORDERS RE CHANGE IN

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND/OR

HEARING DATE FOR

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS

Date: October 3, 2006

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Ctrm: 11

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins

By and through their respective attorneys of record, plaintiffs Nothing To It!!!, LLC, et al. and

defendant Jerry R. Jolly, in his capacity as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage

Control, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

A. The hearing on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss shall remain on October 3, 2006, the date

to which it was rescheduled by the Court, however the date on which the opposition and reply briefs

are due shall be extended as follows: (a) plaintiffs’ opposition brief, presently due on August 8,

2006, shall be filed and served on August 31, 2006; and (b) defendant’s reply, presently due on

Case 3:06-cv-02653-MJJ Document 25 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-02653-MJJ Document 27 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re Change In Briefing Schedule, etc. Case No. C06-02653 MJJ 

August 15, 2006, shall be filed and served on September 26, 2006. 

B. Alternatively, should the Court prefer, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss shall

be rescheduled to October 17, 2006; the opposition brief shall be served and filed not less than 21

days before the rescheduled hearing date—that is, on or before September 26, 2006; and the reply

brief shall be filed and served not less than 14 days before the rescheduled date—that is, on or before

October 3, 2006. 

GOOD CAUSE exists for approval of one or the other of the scheduling changes sought

pursuant to this stipulation, as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss was filed on July 19, 2006 and originally noticed for

hearing on August 29, 2006.

2. While the Court has since rescheduled the hearing to October 3, 2006, pursuant to the

Court’s Standing Order, the opposition and reply briefs remain due on August 8, 2006 and August

15, 2006, respectively.

3. The instant stipulation either to retain the present hearing date but extend the time for the

filing and service of these briefs or, alternatively, to reschedule the hearing to October 17, 2006 and

extend the time for their filing and service is sought in order to allow plaintiffs an adequate time for

response while at the same time accommodating the pre-existing vacation plans of their counsel

without prejudicing defendant’s ability to reply given the other matters requiring its counsel’s

attention during September of 2006. These include preparation of the briefing on cross motions for

summary judgment scheduled to be heard in another matter on October 6, 2006.

4. Grant of one or the other of the requested scheduling changes will not unduly delay the

resolution of this action.

5. The parties were unable to file the instant stipulation 14 days prior to the earliest date

affected by the stipulation due primarily to defendant’s counsel’s absence from her office on

vacation during the period from and including July 20, 2006 through July 31, 2006.

Case 3:06-cv-02653-MJJ Document 25 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-02653-MJJ Document 27 Filed 08/24/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re Change In Briefing Schedule, etc. Case No. C06-02653 MJJ 

Dated: August 4, 2006 EPSTEIN, COHEN, DONAHOE & MENDES

By: /s/ Robert D. Epstein 

 ROBERT D. EPSTEIN

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: August 4, 2006 BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JACOB APPELSMITH

Senior Assistant Attorney General

FIEL D. TIGNO

MIGUEL A. NERI

Supervising Deputy Attorneys General

 /s/ Marjorie E. Cox 

MARJORIE E. COX

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 3:06-cv-02653-MJJ Document 25 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 3 of 4
 Case 3:06-cv-02653-MJJ Document 27 Filed 08/24/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

Stipulation & [Proposed] Order Re Change In Briefing Schedule, etc. Case No. C06-02653 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the due dates

for the opposition and reply briefs on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss shall be extended as

follows: (1) plaintiffs’ opposition brief, presently due on August 8, 2006, shall be filed and

served no later than August 31, 2006; and (b) defendant’s reply, presently due on August 15,

2006, shall be filed and served on September 26, 2006. The hearing on the motion shall remain

on Tuesday, October 3, 2006 at 9:30 a.m., as previously rescheduled by the Court.

DATED: August , 2006

 

HONORABLE MARTIN J. JENKINS

ALTERNATIVE [PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on

Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss shall be rescheduled to Tuesday, October 17, 2006, at 9:30 a.m.;

any brief in opposition shall be served and filed not less than 21 days before the rescheduled

hearing date—that is, on or before September 26, 2006; and any reply brief shall be filed and

served not less than 14 days before the rescheduled date—that is, on or before October 3, 2006. 

DATED: August , 2006

 

HONORABLE MARTIN J. JENKINS

Case 3:06-cv-02653-MJJ Document 25 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 4 of 4

24 19

Case 3:06-cv-02653-MJJ Document 27 Filed 08/24/06 Page 4 of 4