Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02467/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02467-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kenneth Dewayne Davis,

Petitioner,

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al.,

Respondents, 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No.CIV 06-2467-PHX-SMM (MHB) 

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. #1). Respondents filed an Answer (Doc. # 14), and Petitioner

filed a Reply (Doc. #20). The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Burns for Report and

Recommendation (Doc. #10). On September 25, 2007 the Magistrate Judge filed a Report

and Recommendation with this Court (Doc. #21). Petitioner filed a notification that he did

not receive the Report and Recommendation until October 8, 2007 and that he would be

filing objections to the Report and Recommendation. To date, no objections have been filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see Baxter v. Sullivan,

923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). Parties have ten days from the service of a copy of the

Magistrate's recommendation within which to file specific written objections to the Court.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. Failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s

recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:06-cv-02467-SMM Document 23 Filed 11/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

factual findings and waives all objections to those findings on appeal. See Turner v. Duncan,

158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). A failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s conclusion “is

a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal.”

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998).

DISCUSSION

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no

Objections having been made by any party thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and adopts

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth,

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation

of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #21).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, terminating this case.

DATED this 27th day of November, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-02467-SMM Document 23 Filed 11/28/07 Page 2 of 2