Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-03123/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-03123-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-05208-JF 

JAY W. EISENHOFER (admitted pro hac vice) 

MICHAEL J. BARRY (admitted pro hac vice) 

GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 

Chase Manhattan Centre 

1201 N. Market Street 

Wilmington, Delaware 19801 

Telephone: (302) 622-7000 

Facsimile: (302) 622-7100 

E-Mail: jeisenhofer@gelaw.com 

mbarry@gelaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center 

28th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

E-Mail: griley@omm.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

(additional counsel listed on signature page) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MARTIN VOGEL and KENNETH 

MAHONEY, on Behalf of Themselves 

and All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

STEVEN P. JOBS, PETER OPPENHEIMER, 

FRED ANDERSON, WILLIAM V. 

CAMPBELL, MILLARD S. DREXLER, 

ALBERT GORE, JR., ARTHUR D. 

LEVINSON, JEROME P. YORK and 

APPLE COMPUTER, INC., 

Defendants. 

(caption continued on following page) 

Case No. C06-05208-JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING 

AND RELATED MATTERS 

Department: Ctrm 3, 5th Floor 

Judge: Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

**E-Filed 4/8/2010**

------------------

Case 5:08-cv-03123-JF Document 16 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-05208-JF

MARTIN VOGEL and KENNETH 

MAHONEY, on Behalf of Themselves 

and All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

APPLE, INC., STEVEN P. JOBS, FRED 

ANDERSON, NANCY HEINEN, WILLIAM 

V. CAMPBELL, MILLARD S. DREXLER, 

ARTHUR D. LEVINSON, and JEROME P. 

YORK 

Defendants. 

Case No. C08-03123-JF 

Case 5:08-cv-03123-JF Document 16 Filed 04/08/10 Page 2 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 1 - STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-05208-JF

WHEREAS, on August 24, 2006, plaintiffs Vogel and Mahoney filed a class action 

complaint in this Court alleging that certain defendants violated the Securities Exchange Act of 

1934 (the “Exchange Act”), including § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and § 20(a). That 

action is styled as Martin Vogel and Kenneth Mahoney v. Steven Jobs, et al., Case No. 5:06-cv05208-JF (N.D. Cal.) (“Vogel I”); 

WHEREAS, on January 19, 2007, this Court appointed the New York City Employees’ 

Retirement System (“NYCERS”) as Lead Plaintiff in Vogel I and Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. as 

Lead Counsel in Vogel I; 

WHEREAS, on March 23, 2007, NYCERS filed, as Lead Plaintiff, the Consolidated 

Complaint and asserted claims under §§ 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and for the alleged 

breach of the common law duty of disclosure. The Consolidated Complaint did not assert any 

claims for alleged violations of §10(b) of the Exchange Act or Rule 10b-5 thereunder; 

WHEREAS, on November 14, 2007, this Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss 

the Consolidated Complaint (“Dismissal Order”); 

WHEREAS, on December 14, 2007, NYCERS filed a motion for leave to file a First 

Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint to assert claims for alleged violations of § 10(b) 

of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; 

WHEREAS, on May 14, 2008, this Court denied NYCERS’s motion for leave to file a 

First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Denial Order”); 

WHEREAS, on June 12, 2008, this Court entered Judgment for the defendants 

(“Judgment”); 

WHEREAS, on June 17, 2008, NYCERS filed its Notice of Appeal of the Dismissal 

Order, the Denial Order, and the Judgment (“NYCERS’s Appeal”); 

WHEREAS, on June 27, 2008, plaintiffs Vogel and Mahoney filed a new class action 

complaint in this Court alleging that certain defendants violated the Exchange Act, including 

§ 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and § 20(a). That action is styled Martin Vogel and Kenneth 

Mahoney v. Apple Inc., et al., Case No. 5:08-cv-03123-JF (N.D. Cal.) (“Vogel II”); 

Case 5:08-cv-03123-JF Document 16 Filed 04/08/10 Page 3 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-05208-JF

WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, on July 22, 2008, this Court entered an 

Order staying Vogel II pending resolution of NYCERS’s Appeal; 

WHEREAS, on January 28, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in 

NYCERS’s Appeal affirming the Dismissal Order and reversing the Denial Order; 

WHEREAS, on February 19, 2010, the Ninth Circuit issued a mandate in NYCERS’s 

Appeal; 

WHEREAS, on March 22, 2010, NYCERS filed a First Amended Consolidated Class 

Action Complaint in Vogel I captioned In Re Apple Inc. PSLRA Backdating Litigation (“First 

Amended Complaint”); 

WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a Case Management Conference in Vogel I on April 

30, 2010, at 10:30 a.m.; 

WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a Case Management Conference in Vogel II on April 

9, 2010, at 10:30 a.m.; 

WHEREAS, the parties believe that Vogel I and Vogel II concern substantially the same 

parties, transactions or events and involve common questions of law or fact, and should be 

deemed related pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12 and consolidated pursuant to Rule 42 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to avoid unnecessary cost or delay; 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE, AND THE COURT HEREBY 

ORDERS, THAT: 

1. Vogel I and Vogel II shall be deemed related pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-

12 and Vogel II shall be consolidated with Vogel I pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure and 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B). NYCERS shall be Lead Plaintiff and 

Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. shall be Lead Counsel with respect to the consolidated action. 

2. The docket in Vogel I (Case No. 5:06-cv-05208-JF) shall constitute the Master 

Docket for this proceeding. 

// 

// 

// 

Case 5:08-cv-03123-JF Document 16 Filed 04/08/10 Page 4 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 3 - STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-05208-JF

3. Every pleading in this proceeding shall bear the following caption: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IN RE APPLE INC. ) Case No. C06-05208-JF 

SECURITIES LITIGATION ) 

 ) CLASS ACTION

 ) 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) 

 ) 

4. When a pleading is intended to be applicable to all actions to which this 

Order is applicable, the phrase “All Actions” shall appear immediately after the words “This 

Document Relates To:” in the caption set out above. When a pleading is intended to be 

applicable only to some, but not all, of such actions, the document shall list, immediately 

after the phrase “This Document Relates To:”, the docket number for each individual action 

to which the document applies, along with the last name of the first-listed plaintiff in any 

such action. 

5. The Case Management Conference set for April 9, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. in 

Vogel II shall be vacated. 

6. The Case Management Conference set for April 30, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. in 

Vogel I shall remain on calendar. 

7. The First Amended Complaint filed in Vogel I shall be the operative 

complaint for the consolidated action. Plaintiffs shall re-file the First Amended Complaint 

with a corrected caption page to reflect the caption for the consolidated action. This 

consolidation does not affect any separate right or defense asserted in any of the 

consolidated actions. 

8. Defendants shall file their responses to the First Amended Complaint by 

June 25, 2010. 

9. In the event that Defendants respond to the First Amended Complaint by 

filing motions, the briefing and hearing schedule for Defendants’ motions will be: 

Case 5:08-cv-03123-JF Document 16 Filed 04/08/10 Page 5 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 4 - STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-05208-JF

 Plaintiffs’ Oppositions Due: July 27, 2010 

 Defendants’ Replies Due: August 17, 2010 

 Hearing: To be set by the Court. 

10. Defendants shall not be required to file any responsive pleading to the 

pending complaint in Vogel II. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 7, 2010 GEORGE A. RILEY 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ George A. Riley 

George A. Riley 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

Dated: April 7, 2010 DOUGLAS R. YOUNG (S.B. #73248)

FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP 

Russ Building 

235 Montgomery Street, 17th floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 954-4400 

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 

E-Mail: dyoung@fbm.com 

By: /s/ Douglas R. Young 

Douglas R. Young 

Attorneys for Defendants 

STEVEN P. JOBS, WILLIAM V. 

CAMPBELL, MILLARD S. DREXLER, 

ARTHUR D. LEVINSON and JEROME B. 

YORK 

Case 5:08-cv-03123-JF Document 16 Filed 04/08/10 Page 6 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 5 - STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-05208-JF

Dated: April 7, 2010 JEROME C. ROTH (S.B. #159483)

YOHANCE C. EDWARDS (S.B. #237244) 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

560 Mission Street, 27th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 512-4000 

Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 

E-Mail: Jerome.Roth@mto.com 

Yohance.Edwards@mto.com 

By: /s/ Yohance C. Edwards 

Yohance C. Edwards 

Attorneys for Defendants 

FRED D. ANDERSON and NANCY R. 

HEINEN 

Dated: April 7, 2010 JAY W. EISENHOFER (admitted pro hac vice) 

MICHAEL J. BARRY (admitted pro hac vice) 

GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. 

Chase Manhattan Centre 

1201 N. Market Street 

Wilmington, Delaware 19801 

Telephone: (302) 622-7000 

Facsimile: (302) 622-7100 

E-Mail: jeisenhofer@gelaw.com 

mbarry@gelaw.com 

By: /s/ Michael J. Barry 

Michael J. Barry 

MERRILL GLEN EMERICK (SB# 117248)

ANDERLINI & EMERICK LLP 

411 Borel Avenue, Suite 501 

San Mateo, California 94402 

Telephone: (650) 242-4884 

Facsimile: (650) 212-0081 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff 

THE NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES’ 

RETIREMENT SYSTEM 

Case 5:08-cv-03123-JF Document 16 Filed 04/08/10 Page 7 of 8
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 6 - STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C06-05208-JF

Dated: April 7, 2010 PATRICE L. BISHOP (S.B. #182256)

STULL, STULL & BRODY 

10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2300 

Los Angeles, California 90024 

Telephone: (310) 209-2468 

Facsimile: (310) 209-2087 

E-Mail: service@ssbla.com 

By: /s/ Patrice L. Bishop 

Patrice L. Bishop 

Howard T. Longman 

STULL, STULL & BRODY 

6 East 45th Street 

New York, NY 10017 

Telephone: (212) 687-7230 

Facsimile: (212) 490-2022 

Gary S. Graifman 

KANTROWITZ, GOLDHAMER & 

GRAIFMAN 

747 Chestnut Ridge Road 

Chestnut Ridge, New York 10977 

Telephone: (845) 356-2570 

Facsimile: (845) 356-4335 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

MARTIN VOGEL and KENNETH 

MAHONEY 

I, George A. Riley, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Scheduling and Related Matters. In compliance with 

General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Douglas R. Young, Yohance C. Edwards, Michael J. 

Barry, and Patrice L. Bishop have concurred in this filing. 

By: /s/ George A. Riley__________________

 George A. Riley 

O R D E R

 PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April __, 2010 

 The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

 United States District Judge 

MP1:1191444.3 

8

Case 5:08-cv-03123-JF Document 16 Filed 04/08/10 Page 8 of 8