Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05025/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05025-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLORIA GRENING WOLK,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PHILIP R. GREEN,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-5025 BZ

ORDER RE VIDEO DEPOSITION 

 On November 1, 2007, the court received a letter from

plaintiff outlining her concerns regarding the use of her

video deposition and its availability to the public. Because

the letter contains much irrelevant material of a personal

nature, I am ORDERING IT SEALED. Plaintiff is admonished not

to include such material in future letters or to follow the

procedures of Local Rule 79-5. Defendant's counsel responded

by memorandum filed with the court dated November 5, 2007. 

I held a telephonic conference on November 6, 2007, to

discuss the discovery dispute. All parties participated. I

Case 3:06-cv-05025-BZ Document 106 Filed 11/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

conclude that no further argument or briefing is needed. For

the reasons articulated on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as

follows: 

1. Plaintiff is to proceed with her video deposition. 

Defendant shall use the video deposition only for purposes of

this litigation.

2. It is the courts understanding that following the

deposition, the defendant will obtain the original and a copy

of the video. Defendant shall not make any other copies or

cause the video deposition to be reproduced in any way. 

3. Plaintiff’s request that her video deposition not be

used at trial is DENIED.

4. Before December 1, 2007, Mrs. Wolk shall lodge with

the court, a record of the meet and confer session that she

had with counsel for defendant about the videotaping issue. 

The court has concerns that the parties are not meeting and

conferring in good faith. 

Dated: November 7, 2007

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\WOLK\ORDER RE VIDEO DEPO.10.27.07 LTR.wpd

Case 3:06-cv-05025-BZ Document 106 Filed 11/07/07 Page 2 of 2