Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04265/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04265-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL DEL AGUILA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

GENENTECH-ROCHE TRANSITIONAL

BENEFIT PLAN, an unknown entity;

GENENTECH, INC.; GENENTECH PLAN

ADMINISTRATOR; GENENTECH PLAN

FIDUCIARY; and DOES 1-50,

Defendants. /

No. C 14-4265 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF

DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH

CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On January 9, 2015, plaintiff electronically filed a document titled “First Amended

Complaint.” Plaintiff has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s

Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each

document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7);

see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the

Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the abovereferenced document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if he fails in the future to comply with

the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed

document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the

record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely

provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2015 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-04265-MMC Document 25 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 1