Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00353/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00353-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RONALD E. CEARLEY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WELLS FARGO BANK, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-353-MCE-EFB PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

On February 4, 2016, the district judge adopted this court’s findings and recommendations 

and granted defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend.1 ECF No. 34. That order gave 

plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in the 

January 8, 2016 findings and recommendations, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an 

amended complaint would result in this action being dismissed. Id. 

 The deadline has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 

responded to the order. 

///// 

///// 

 1

 This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 

undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

Case 2:15-cv-00353-MCE-EFB Document 36 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the 

Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: March 16, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-00353-MCE-EFB Document 36 Filed 03/16/16 Page 2 of 2