Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00927/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00927-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATED DISMISSAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT VISIO CORPORATION

Case No.: C 06-0927 JSW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

GEORGE FROST (State Bar No. 178528)

LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE FROST

2930 Magnolia Street

Berkeley, CA 94705

Phone: (510) 666-6001

Fax: (415) 247-6001

geofrost@comcast.net

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CAD SYSTEMS UNLIMITED, INC.

MICHAEL J. BETTINGER (State Bar No. 122196)

PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP

55 Second Street, Suite 1700

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: (415) 882-8200

Fax: (415) 882-8220

mikeb@prestongates.com

Attorneys for Defendant

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CAD SYSTEMS UNLIMITED, INC., a 

California corporation,

Plaintiff, vs.

VISIO CORPORATION, a Washington 

corporation; MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

a Washington corporation,

Defendants. Case No. C 06-0927 JSW

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND 

STIPULATED DISMISSAL 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF 

DEFENDANT VISIO 

CORPORATION 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff CAD Systems 

Unlimited, Inc. (“CAD Systems”) and defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) hereby 

stipulate to the voluntary dismissal without prejudice of Visio Corporation (“Visio”) as a defendant in 

this action. The parties so stipulate because, (1) after its acquisition by Microsoft, Visio ceased to 

Case 3:06-cv-00927-JSW Document 19 Filed 05/23/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cv-00927-JSW Document 30 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER AND STIPULATED DISMISSAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT VISIO CORPORATION

Case No.: C 06-0927 JSW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

exist as a separate corporate entity, and (2) Microsoft agrees that it is the real defendant party in 

interest in this litigation.

DATED: May 22, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE FROST

By /s/

George Frost

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CAD SYSTEMS UNLIMITED, INC

DATED: May 22, 2006 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP

By /s/

Michael J. Bettinger

Attorneys for Defendant

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _____________ ____________________________

 United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-00927-JSW Document 19 Filed 05/23/2006 Page 2 of 2

May 24, 2006

Case 3:06-cv-00927-JSW Document 30 Filed 09/22/06 Page 2 of 2