Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01878/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01878-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO NAVARRO,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEBRA HERNDON, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2: 09-cv-1878 KJM KJN P

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 25, 2016, the undersigned recommended that defendants’ motion 

for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part. (ECF No. 183.) The findings and 

recommendations were eighty-two pages. (Id.)

On April 6, 2016, the undersigned scheduled this action for a settlement conference. 

(ECF No. 184.) The undersigned ordered that objections to the findings and recommendations 

were due fourteen days after the settlement conference if no settlement was reached. (Id.) The 

undersigned directed the Warden at Ironwood State Prison, where plaintiff was housed, to 

transport plaintiff to court in Sacramento for the settlement conference. (ECF No. 185.) 

On July 8, 2016, a settlement conference was held. This action did not settle. On July 25, 

2016, the undersigned granted plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file objections. (ECF 

No. 200.) On August 15, 2016, plaintiff filed a four page objections. (ECF No. 204.) Plaintiff’s 

Case 2:09-cv-01878-KJM-KJN Document 207 Filed 08/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections indicate that he is now housed at the California Training Facility. In his objections, 

plaintiff states that his legal property is still at California State Prison-Sacramento, where he was 

housed for the settlement conference. 

Without access to his legal property, plaintiff alleges that he is unable to prepare 

meaningful objections or otherwise prosecute this action. The defendants are located at 

California State Prison-Sacramento, where plaintiff alleges his legal property is located.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within ten days of the date of this order, 

defendants shall inform the court of the status of plaintiff’s access to his legal property.

Dated: August 19, 2016

Na1878.obj

Case 2:09-cv-01878-KJM-KJN Document 207 Filed 08/19/16 Page 2 of 2