Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02961/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02961-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114) 

JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268) 

HADDAD & SHERWIN 

505 Seventeenth Street 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 452-5500 

Fax: (510) 452-5510 

Attorneys for Coles Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SRI LOUISE COLES, et al. 

 Plaintiffs 

vs. 

CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal entity, et al. 

_____Defendants_______________________ 

LOCAL 10, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE 

AND WAREHOUSE UNION, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY OF OAKLAND; et al., 

 Defendants. 

File No. C -03-2962 TEH (JL) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

File No. C -03-2961 TEH (JL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST 

CERTAIN INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS IN 

COLES ACTION

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

Case No. C-03-2961 TEH (JL): STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST CERTAIN 

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS IN COLES ACTION

1

28

It is agreed by and between the Coles Plaintiffs’ counsel, Haddad & Sherwin, and counsel 

for Defendants, Gregory M. Fox, that all remaining claims for damages by each Coles Plaintiff 

against the following individual defendants, to the extent such claims may have been brought 

(individual plaintiffs did not necessarily bring claims against each named defendant), may be 

Case 3:03-cv-02961-TEH Document 161 Filed 12/12/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

dismissed, with prejudice, each side to bear their own statutory costs and fees to the extent 

necessitated by damages claims against dismissed defendants, based on Defendants’ 

representation that these Defendants did not use or authorize the use of force against Plaintiffs 

and played no role in arresting Plaintiff Lindsay Parkinson: Deputy Chief Howard Jordan, Lt. 

Poulson, Sgt. Hogenmiller, Sgt. (now, Captain) Tracey, and Officers Oerlemans, Knight, 

Romans, R. Moore, and J. Fukuda. 

It is further agreed that all remaining claims for damages, to the extent such claims may 

have been brought, by each of the following Coles Plaintiffs against the following individual 

defendants may be dismissed, with prejudice, each side to bear their own statutory costs and fees 

to the extent necessitated by damages claims against dismissed defendants, based on Defendants’ 

representation that these Defendants did not use or authorize the use of force against the 

individual Plaintiffs listed below and played no role in arresting Plaintiff Lindsay Parkinson: 

1. Plaintiff Sri Louise Coles did not bring claims against motorcycle officers Low, 

Fisher, and Sgt. Wallace. Plaintiff Sri Louise Coles agrees to dismiss her 

remaining damages claims against “Blue Team” officers Worden, Uu, 

Steinberger, Doolittle, Saunders, Sgt. Campbell, and Sgt. Tolleson, (leaving the 

City of Oakland, Chief Word, DC Haw, Captain Yee, Lt. Kozicki, motorcycle 

officer Nichelini and “Red Team” officers Del Rosario, Gutierrez, Gonzalez, and 

Holmgren as defendants for Ms. Coles’ claims); 

Case No. C-03-2961 TEH (JL): STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST CERTAIN 

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS IN COLES ACTION

2

28

2. Plaintiff Ron Smith did not bring claims against motorcycle officers Nichelini, 

Low, Fisher, and Sgt. Wallace. Plaintiff Ron Smith agrees to dismiss his 

remaining damages claims against “Blue Team” officers Worden, Uu, 

Steinberger, Doolittle, Saunders, Sgt. Campbell, and Sgt. Tolleson, (leaving the 

City of Oakland, Chief Word, DC Haw, Captain Yee, Lt. Kozicki, and “Red 

Case 3:03-cv-02961-TEH Document 161 Filed 12/12/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Team” officers Del Rosario, Gutierrez, Gonzalez, and Holmgren as defendants for 

Mr. Smith’s claims); 

3. Plaintiff Jennifer Hansen did not bring claims against motorcycle officers 

Nichelini, Low, Fisher, and Sgt. Wallace. Plaintiff Jennifer Hansen agrees to 

dismiss her remaining damages claims against “Red Team” officers Del Rosario, 

Gutierrez, Gonzalez, and Holmgren, (leaving the City of Oakland, Chief Word, 

DC Haw, Captain Yee, Lt. Kozicki, and “Blue Team” officers Worden, Uu, 

Steinberger, Doolittle, Saunders, Sgt. Campbell, and Sgt. Tolleson, as defendants 

for Ms. Hansen’s claims); 

4. Plaintiff Scott Bohning did not bring claims against motorcycle officers Nichelini, 

Low, Fisher, and Sgt. Wallace. Plaintiff Scott Bohning agrees to dismiss his 

remaining damages claims against “Red Team” officers Del Rosario, Gutierrez, 

Gonzalez, and Holmgren, (leaving the City of Oakland, Chief Word, DC Haw, 

Captain Yee, Lt. Kozicki, and “Blue Team” officers Worden, Uu, Steinberger, 

Doolittle, Saunders, Sgt. Campbell, and Sgt. Tolleson, as defendants for Mr. 

Bohning’s claims); 

5. Plaintiff Lindsay Parkinson did not bring claims against “Red Team” officers Del 

Rosario, Gutierrez, Gonzalez, and Holmgren, “Blue Team” officers Worden, Uu, 

Steinberger, Doolittle, Saunders, Sgt. Campbell, and Sgt. Tolleson, or motorcycle 

officer Nichelini. (Plaintiff Lindsay Parkinson’s remaining defendants are the 

City of Oakland, Chief Word, DC Haw, Captain Yee, Lt. Kozicki, and motorcycle 

officers Low, Fisher, and Sgt. Wallace). 

Case No. C-03-2961 TEH (JL): STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST CERTAIN 

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS IN COLES ACTION

3

28

These dismissals do not affect Plaintiffs’ claims for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs 

related to the previous settlement and partial dismissal of injunctive relief claims in this matter. 

Case 3:03-cv-02961-TEH Document 161 Filed 12/12/05 Page 3 of 4
Case No. C-03-2961 TEH (JL): STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST CERTAIN 

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS IN COLES ACTION 

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

So Stipulated: 

Dated: December 9, 2005 HADDAD & SHERWIN 

 By: /s/_______________________________ 

 Michael J. Haddad 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 SRI LOUISE COLES, et al. 

Dated: December 9, 2005 BERTRAND, FOX, & ELLIOT 

 By: /s/______________________________ 

 Gregory M. Fox 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 CITY OF OAKLAND, et al. 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by 

a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. Dated: December 9, 2005. 

 /s/ 

 MICHAEL J. HADDAD 

 Good cause appearing, the stipulation is so ordered. 

 So Ordered. 

Dated: ______________________________ 

 The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

12/12/05

Case 3:03-cv-02961-TEH Document 161 Filed 12/12/05 Page 4 of 4