Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-02496/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-02496-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION REGARDING [PROPOSED] AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02496-EJD-PSG 

JOHN NEUKOM (Bar No. 275887) 

johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com 

ANDREW M. HOLMES (Bar No. 260475) 

drewholmes@quinnedmanuel.com 

ALICIA VEGLIA (Bar No. 291070) 

aliciaveglia@quinnemanuel.com 

MATTHEW CANNON (Bar No. 252666) 

matthewcannon@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4788 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC. 

SHANE BRUN (SBN 179079) 

sbrun@goodwinprocter.com 

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone.: 415.733.6000 

Facsimile.: 415.677.9041 

CHARLES H. SANDERS (pro hac vice) 

csanders@goodwinprocter.com

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

53 State Street 

Boston, MA 02109 

Telephone: (617) 570-1315 

Facsimile: (617) 523-1231 

Attorneys for Defendant FIREEYE, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

FORTINET, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

FIREEYE, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 5:13-cv-02496-EJD-PSG

STIPULATION REGARDING 

[PROPOSED] AMENDED ANSWER AND 

COUNTERCLAIMS 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

Courtroom: 4 

Judge: Hon. Edward J. Davila 

Floor: 5th Floor 

XXXXXXXX

Case 4:13-cv-02496-HSG Document 84 Filed 02/10/15 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

STIPULATION REGARDING [PROPOSED] AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02496-EJD-PSG 

Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant FireEye, Inc. (“FireEye” or “Defendant”) 

hereby stipulate and agree to the following terms: 

WHEREAS on November 21, 2014, Defendant filed its Answer to Fortinet’s First Amended 

Complaint and Counterclaims; and 

WHEREAS FireEye sought consent from Plaintiff to amend its Answer and Counterclaims to 

include a government sales defense under 28 U.S.C. § 1498, and Plaintiff agreed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties by and through their respective counsel hereby stipulate 

and agree that the Amended Answer to Fortinet’s First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims 

attached hereto as Exhibit A may be filed by consent pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

15(a)(2) and deemed filed and served as of this date. 

Case 4:13-cv-02496-HSG Document 84 Filed 02/10/15 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

STIPULATION REGARDING [PROPOSED] AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02496-EJD-PSG 

IT IS SO STIPULATED on this 9th day of February, 2015. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: February 9, 2015 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

 By: /s/ Matthew Cannon

John M. Neukom 

Andrew M. Holmes 

Alicia M. Veglia 

Matthew Cannon 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Tel: 415-875-6600 

Fax: 415-875-6700 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

FORTINET, INC. 

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 

 By: /s/ Shane Brun

Shane Brun 

Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Tel.: 415.733.6000 

Fax.: 415.677.9041 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FIREEYE, INC.

ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _____________________ ______________________________________ 

 HON. EDWARD J. DAVILA 

 United States District Judge 

The amended answer shall be filed as a separate docket item forthwith. 2/10/2015

Case 4:13-cv-02496-HSG Document 84 Filed 02/10/15 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

STIPULATION REGARDING [PROPOSED] AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02496-EJD-PSG 

Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) Attestation 

I, Shane Brun, am the ECF user whose ID and Password are being used to file this 

STIPULATION REGARDING [PROPOSED] AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS. 

In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Matthew Cannon counsel 

for Plaintiff, Fortinet, Inc., has concurred in its filing. 

Dated: February 9, 2015 /s/ Shane Brun

 Shane Brun 

Case 4:13-cv-02496-HSG Document 84 Filed 02/10/15 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4 

STIPULATION REGARDING [PROPOSED] AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-02496-EJD-PSG 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on February 9, 2015, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5-5. Any 

counsel of record who have not consented to electronic service through the Court’s CM/ECF system 

will be served by electronic mail, first class mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery. 

 /s/ Shane Brun

 Shane Brun 

Case 4:13-cv-02496-HSG Document 84 Filed 02/10/15 Page 5 of 5