Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_11-cv-00057/USCOURTS-casd-3_11-cv-00057-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 120
Nature of Suit: Marine Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD RAY MCCALL,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 11-CV-57-LAB-NLS

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

vs.

UNCLE SAM’S MARINES,

Defendant.

Mr. McCall has sued Uncle Sam’s Marines “FOR MY Medicla [sic] Rights under The

GI Bill 1970 . . . .” Now pending is his Motion to Proceed IFP.

I. IFP Motion

All parties instituting a civil action in a district court of the United States, except for

habeas petitioners, must pay a filing fee of $350. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). A party is

excused from paying the fee, however, if the Court grants leave to proceed IFP pursuant to

28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Mr. McCall has submitted an IFP application that sufficiently, even if

incompletely, demonstrates his inability to pay the $350 filing fee. It is unclear whether Mr.

McCall is currently incarcerated, but he claims he is employed for no pay and has no

income, assets, or savings of any kind. His Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is

therefore GRANTED.

//

//

Case 3:11-cv-00057-LAB-NLS Document 3 Filed 03/26/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

II. Initial Screening

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court must screen each civil action commenced

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and dismiss the action if the Court finds it is frivolous or

malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief

from an immune defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845, 45

(9th Cir. 2001) (“[T]he provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) are not limited to prisoners.”);

Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not

only permits but requires” the court to sua sponte dismiss an IFP complaint that fails to state

a claim).

The Court finds that Mr. McCall’s complaint is frivolous and fails to state a claim upon

which relief can be granted. It contains no factual allegations that make clear who Mr.

McCall is, what kind of party Uncle Sam’s Marines is, and what it is that Mr. McCall wants.

Instead, his complaint consists of a single, incomplete sentence. The charitable

interpretation is that Mr. McCall is a veteran and seeks medical benefits, but he doesn’t

allege adequate facts to lend substance to that interpretation. This case is DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 23, 2012

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge

Case 3:11-cv-00057-LAB-NLS Document 3 Filed 03/26/12 Page 2 of 2