Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02652/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02652-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 07-02652 CRB

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YVONNE GLOVER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP

COMPREHENSIVE DISABILITY

BENEFIT PLAN,

Defendants.

Case No. 07-02652 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

WHEREAS, on August 9, 2007, plaintiff YVONNE GLOVER (“plaintiff”) filed a

Second Amended Complaint naming “Pacific Telesis Group Comprehensive Disability Benefit

Plan” as the defendant in this action;

WHEREAS, the defendant Pacific Telesis Group Comprehensive Disability Benefit Plan

contends that “AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1” (“defendant”) is the correct name for the

defendant in this action instead of “Pacific Telesis Group Comprehensive Disability Benefit

Plan;”

WHEREAS, AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 agrees that it will satisfy any judgment

rendered in this lawsuit;

Case 3:07-cv-02652-CRB Document 31 Filed 08/20/07 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 07-02652 CRB

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, defendant and plaintiff (collectively referred to as the “Parties”) agree that

plaintiff may amend her Second Amended Complaint to name “AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan

No. 1” as the defendant instead, and in place, of “Pacific Telesis Group Comprehensive

Disability Benefit Plan” by August 24, 2007;

WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference (“CMC”) is presently scheduled for August

24, 2007, and the date for filing a Joint CMC Statement and Rule 26(f) Disclosures is August 15,

2007;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that it is in the best interest of the Parties and judicial

economy to continue the dates currently set for the CMC and the filing of the Joint CMC

Statement and Rule 26(f) Disclosures in anticipation of the filing of a Third Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the date set for the CMC should be continued to

October 12, 2007, at 8:30 a.m. and the filing of the Joint CMC Statement and Rule 26(f)

Disclosures should be continued October 3, 2007.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties that:

1. Plaintiff be granted leave to file a Third Amended Complaint to name “AT&T

Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1” as the defendant in this action in place of “Pacific Telesis Group

Comprehensive Disability Benefit Plan” by August 24, 2007;

2. The Case Management Conference be continued to from August 24, 2007 to

October 12, 2007; and

3. The date for filing the Joint CMC Statement and Rule 26(f) Disclosures be

continued from August 15, 2007, to October 3, 2007.

Dated: August 17, 2007 LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER &

JACKSON, P.C.

/s/ TERESA RENAKER

TERESA RENAKER

Attorneys for Plaintiff

YVONNE GLOVER

Case 3:07-cv-02652-CRB Document 31 Filed 08/20/07 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 07-02652 CRB

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: August 17, 2007 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP

/s/ SUSAN T. KUMAGAI

SUSAN T. KUMAGAI

Attorneys for Defendant AT&T

UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1

ORDER

The foregoing stipulation having been entered and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August ___, 2007 CHARLES R. BREYER

JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any

signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this

efiled document.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this document was served electronically on August 17, 2007, on

counsel of record in compliance with Federal Rule 5, Local Rule 5.6 and General Order 45, by

use of the Court’s ECF system.

/s/ SUSAN T. KUMAGAI______

SUSAN T. KUMAGAI

Stip to Amend (Final).doc

20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:07-cv-02652-CRB Document 31 Filed 08/20/07 Page 3 of 3