Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01526/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01526-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Eddie W. Bell, Jr., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

Robert Moore and The Hillman Group, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-1526-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Defendant Robert Moore has filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff is advised of the following specific provisions

of LRCiv 7.2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of

Arizona:

Subparagraph (e) provides:

Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a motion including its supporting

memorandum, and the response including its supporting memorandum, each

shall not exceed seventeen (17) pages, exclusive of attachments and any

required statement of facts. Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a reply

including its supporting memorandum shall not exceed eleven (11) pages,

exclusive of attachments.

Subparagraph (i) provides:

If a motion does not conform in all substantial respects with the requirements

of this Local Rule, or if the opposing party does not serve and file the required

answering memoranda, or if counsel for any party fails to appear at the time

and place assigned for oral argument, such non-compliance may be deemed a

consent to the denial or granting of the motion and the Court may dispose of

the motion summarily.

Case 2:06-cv-01526-SMM Document 11 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

It is Plaintiff's obligation to timely respond to all motions. The failure of Plaintiff

to respond to Defendant Moore’s Motion to Dismiss may, in the discretion of the Court,

be deemed a consent to the granting of that Motion without further notice, and

judgment may be entered dismissing the Complaint and action with prejudice pursuant

to LRCiv 7.2(i). See Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 652-53 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have ten (10) days from the date

this Order is filed to file a response to Defendant Moore’s Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Robert Moore shall file any reply

within five (5) days from the date Plaintiff’s response is filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion shall be deemed ready for decision

without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise

ordered by the Court.

DATED this 29th day of November, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-01526-SMM Document 11 Filed 11/29/06 Page 2 of 2