Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00710/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00710-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO C05-00710 JF (RS) (ADR) 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS 

Vicki S. Veenker (158669) 

Brian C. Cannon (193071) 

Adam P. Noah (198669) 

Michael C. Lee (204294) 

Mary B. Boyle (232228) 

SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 

1080 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-1022 

Telephone: (650) 838-3600 

Facsimile: (650) 838-3699 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

UTStarcom, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

UTSTARCOM, INC., 

 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 

 v. 

STARENT NETWORKS CORP., 

 Defendant/Counterclaimant. 

Case No.: C05-00710 JF (RS) (ADR) 

STIPULATION AND 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS 

WHEREAS, Defendant Starent Networks Corp. (“Starent”) filed and served its 

Answer and Counterclaims on May 31, 2005; 

WHEREAS, the present date by which Plaintiff UTStarcom, Inc. (“UTStarcom”) 

must respond to Starent’s Counterclaims is June 20, 2005; 

WHEREAS, Starent’s Third Counterclaim alleges inequitable conduct and such 

counterclaim is the subject of UTStarcom’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss filed June 16, 2005; 

WHEREAS, the parties have mutually agreed that UTStarcom’s time to reply to 

Starent’s Counterclaims should be extended until August 12, 2005, one week after the noticed 

hearing date on UTStarcom’s motion to dismiss Starent’s Third Counterclaim; and 

WHEREAS, this proposed extension will have no effect on the schedule for the 

Initial Case Management Conference or any other dates set forth in the Court’s Initial Scheduling 

Case 3:05-cv-00710-JSW Document 17 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 2 C05-00710 JF (RS) (ADR) 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS 

Order; 

THE PARTIES BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL 

HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), the time for UTStarcom to respond to Starent’s 

Counterclaims is extended until August 12, 2005. 

Dated: June 20, 2005 

SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 

BY: /s/ Vicki S. Veenker 

Vicki S. Veenker 

Attorneys For Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 

UTStarcom, Inc. 

Dated: June 20, 2005 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

BY: /s/ Scott R. Mosko 

Scott R. Mosko 

Attorneys For Defendant/Counterclaimant, 

Starent Networks Corp. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __6/22/05________ (s/electronic-signature-authorized)_____ 

HON. JEREMY FOGEL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:05-cv-00710-JSW Document 17 Filed 06/24/05 Page 2 of 2