Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01837/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01837-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM HENRY PRICE,

Plaintiff, 2:05-cv-1837-GEB-KJM-P

vs.

FOOD-4-LESS, INC., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On August 14, 2006, plaintiff filed “objections” to the magistrate judge’s July 31,

2006 order. The court construes plaintiff’s objections as a request for reconsideration under

Local Rule 72-303(f). Under that rule, a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

appear that the magistrate judge’s July 31, 2006 ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Plaintiff filed similar “objections” on September 7, 2006. Local Rule 72-303(b),

states “rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the

Court within ten court days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties.” E.D. Local

Rule 72-303(b). To the extent petitioner asserts new objections in the document filed on

September 7, 2006, petitioner’s objections are untimely. 

///// 

Case 2:05-cv-01837-GEB -KJM Document 50 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the

magistrate judge filed July 31, 2006 is affirmed. 

Dated: October 23, 2006

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01837-GEB -KJM Document 50 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 2