Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03838/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03838-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HELLO NETWORK, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HELLO AND HOLA MEDIA, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-03838-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings February 1, 2016

Fact discovery cut-off May 31, 2016

Expert disclosures June 30, 2016

Expert rebuttal July 29, 2016

Expert discovery cut-off August 19, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive and Daubert motions October 6, 2016

Oppositions to dispositive and Daubert motions November 3, 2016

Reply briefs in support of dispositive and Daubert motions November 17, 2016

Hearing date on dispositive and Daubert motions December 1, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due January 3, 2017

Case 3:15-cv-03838-JST Document 34 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Pretrial conference January 13, 2017 at 

2:00 p.m.

Trial February 6, 2017 at 

8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) Eight

The Court will refer the case to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Corley for settlement by 

separate order. 

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

For the most part, the parties proposed these dates, and they should assume that the Court 

will enforce them. Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for 

continuance are disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a 

party, party-controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good 

cause to grant a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions 

as good cause to grant a continuance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 21, 2015

_______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-03838-JST Document 34 Filed 12/21/15 Page 2 of 2