Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-03073/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-03073-76/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Although designated as such, plaintiff’s request does not concern an

“administrative” matter. See, e.g., Civil Local Rule 7-11 (providing, as examples of matters

properly raised by motion for administrative relief, “matters such as motions to exceed

otherwise applicable page limitations or motions to file documents under seal”). 

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIVERSAL TRADING & INVESTMENT

COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

PETRO MIKOLAYEVICH KIRITCHENKO, 

et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-99-3073 MMC (EDL)

ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON

PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE

REQUEST; SETTING DEADLINE FOR

SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION

Before the Court is plaintiff’s Administrative Request,1 filed March 4, 2008, that the

Court indicate its willingness to entertain a motion, to be brought pursuant to Rule 60(b) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, based on plaintiff’s purported discovery of fraud upon

the Court. On March 7, 2008, the Kiritchenko Defendants filed opposition, in which the

Lazarenko Defendants and defendant Michael Menko joined. 

As initially filed, plaintiff’s request included eleven exhibits. Thereafter, on March 17,

2008, plaintiff filed “supplemental evidence” in support thereof, consisting of twenty

additional exhibits. Defendants have not had an opportunity to address plaintiff’s

Case 3:99-cv-03073-MMC Document 1817 Filed 03/19/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

supplemental filing. 

Accordingly, the Court hereby defers ruling on plaintiff’s request and affords

defendants the opportunity to file, no later than March 28, 2008, a supplemental opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2008 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:99-cv-03073-MMC Document 1817 Filed 03/19/08 Page 2 of 2