Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-mc-80009/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-mc-80009-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION, 

Applicant

 v.

ANNA’S LINENS, INC.,

Respondent /

No. C 06-80009 MISC MMC (WDB)

ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S

OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION; GRANTING

APPLICATION TO ENFORCE

ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENA;

DENYING REQUEST FOR PROTECTIVE

ORDER; VACATING HEARING

Before the Court are respondent Anna’s Linens, Inc.’s (“Anna’s Linens”) objections

to and motion for de novo review of Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazils’s Report and

Recommendation of May 15, 2006. Applicant Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

(“EEOC”) has filed opposition, to which Anna’s Linens has replied. Having reviewed the

papers filed in support of and in opposition to the objections and motion, the Court deems

the matter appropriate for decision on the papers, VACATES the hearing scheduled for July

7, 2006, and rules as follows.

Having reviewed the matter de novo, the Court, for the reasons expressed therein,

hereby ADOPTS the report and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court hereby:

(1) GRANTS the EEOC’s Application for Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena and

ORDERS Anna’s Linens to produce the requested documents no later than August 9,

Case 3:06-mc-80009-MMC Document 45 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2006; and (2) DENIES, as premature, Anna’s Linens’s request for a protective order with

respect to documents produced under Request Nos. 1, 2, and 16. (See EEOC’s

Response, filed June 12, 2006, at 5:1-3.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 5, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-mc-80009-MMC Document 45 Filed 07/05/06 Page 2 of 2