Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06359/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06359-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

T. TURMEZEL, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-06359-OWW-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 34)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 30)

Plaintiff, Timothy Johnson (“plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On May 31, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On June 26, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time.

On July 7, 2006, the court granted plaintiff an additional thirty

(30) days within which to respond. However, in the interim,

Case 1:03-cv-06359-OWW -DLB Document 38 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations on July 3, 2006.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 31, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s ADA/RA claims

for injunctive relief, filed October 18, 2005, is GRANTED; and,

3. This case proceed on plaintiff’s claims for damages

against defendants Turmezei and Trott for the use of excessive

force and violation of equal protection.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 6, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06359-OWW -DLB Document 38 Filed 08/07/06 Page 2 of 2