Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00437/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00437-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMMY LEE MATTHEWS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0437 LKK GGH P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has concurrently issued an order addressing the amended complaint

filed April 21, 2005. In this order, the court found that the amended complaint stated a colorable

claim for relief against defendant Para. The court also found that the amended complaint did not

state a colorable claim for relief against defendant Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department. For

the reasons stated in that order, the court now recommends that the claims against defendant

Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department be dismissed.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the claims against defendant Sacramento

County Sheriff’s Department contained in the amended complaint filed April 21, 2005, be

dismissed. 

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00437-LKK -GGH Document 9 Filed 05/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 5/25/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

mat437.56

Case 2:05-cv-00437-LKK -GGH Document 9 Filed 05/25/05 Page 2 of 2