Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_11-cv-00784/USCOURTS-azd-4_11-cv-00784-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Alan McKenzie, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of 

Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-784-TUC-FRZ (JR)

 ORDER

Plaintiff Michael Alan McKenzie filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the

Social Security Act for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social

Security Administration, denying his application for Social Security disability insurance

benefits.

This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for all pretrial

proceedings and report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1) and LRCiv 72.1 and LRCiv 72.2, Rules of Practice of the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona.

On July 25, 2013, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau issued her Report and

Recommendation, recommending that the District Court, after its independent review of the

record herein, remand this case to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings. 

This Court, after consideration of all matters presented and an independent review of the

record herein, and there being no objections, accepted and adopted the Report and

Recommendation as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court, and further

Case 4:11-cv-00784-FRZ-JR Document 27 Filed 12/22/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

ordered the Plaintiff’s claim for benefits remanded to the Commissioner of the Social Security

Administration for further proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation.

(Doc. 19) Judgment was entered accordingly. (Doc. 20)

Before the Court for consideration is Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under the

Equal Access to Justice Act. (Doc. 21) 

On January 30, 2014, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau issued her Report and

Recommendation, recommending that the District Court, after its independent review of the

 record herein, issue an order awarding Plaintiff attorney fees in the requested amount of

$4,796.97, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412.

Plaintiff filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26), submitting that

he is eligible for and entitled to attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount “of $5,953.58

($4,796.97 (initial request) + $1,156.61 (supplemental request)) reasonably incurred in this civil

action. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d),” and that “[t]he Court should reject the Magistrate Judge’s EAJA

Report insofar as it awarded Plaintiff $4,796.97 instead of $5,953.58 in attorney fees.”

Defendant filed no objection or response thereto. 

The Court finds, after consideration of all matters presented and an independent review

of the motion, response in opposition, and reply thereto, the Report and Recommendation and

Plaintiff’s objection, that the findings of the Magistrate Judge as set forth in the Report and

Recommendation, shall be accepted and adopted, in part, as the findings of fact and conclusions

of law of this Court, as follows:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 25) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and

conclusions of law by this Court, with the exception that Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in

the amount of $5,953.58 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2412(d). 

DATED this 19th day of December, 2014.

Case 4:11-cv-00784-FRZ-JR Document 27 Filed 12/22/14 Page 2 of 2