Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-01284/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-01284-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Daljinder Singh, )

)

Petitioner, ) CIV 12-01284 PHX GMS MEA

)

v. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

)

Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet )

Napolitano, Katrina S. Kane, )

 ) 

Respondents. )

_____________________________ )

TO THE HONORABLE G. MURRAY SNOW:

Mr. Daljinder Singh (“Petitioner”), who is represented

by counsel in this matter, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on June 14, 2012, alleging his

continued detention by Respondents violates federal law and his

constitutional rights. Respondent filed a Response in

Opposition to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Response”)

(Doc. 24) on July 20, 2012. Petitioner filed a reply (Doc. 26)

to the response on July 25, 2012. 

On August 8, 2012, Petitioner, through counsel, filed

a motion seeking to dismiss his suit seeking a petition for a

writ of habeas corpus as moot. See Doc. 28.

Case 2:12-cv-01284-GMS Document 29 Filed 08/24/12 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

IT IS RECOMMENDED that Petitioner’s motion to dismiss

be granted and that this matter be dismissed with prejudice as

moot.

This recommendation is not an order that is immediately

appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of

appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of Appellate

Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district

court’s judgment. 

Pursuant to Rule 72(b), Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from the

date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to

file specific written objections with the Court. Thereafter,

the parties have fourteen (14) days within which to file a

response to the objections. Pursuant to Rule 7.2, Local Rules

of Civil Procedure for the United States District Court for the

District of Arizona, objections to the Report and Recommendation

may not exceed seventeen (17) pages in length. 

Failure to timely file objections to any factual or

legal determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered

a waiver of a party’s right to de novo appellate consideration

of the issues. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Failure to timely file

objections to any factual or legal determinations of the

Magistrate Judge will constitute a waiver of a party’s right to

appellate review of the findings of fact and conclusions of law

in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the recommendation

of the Magistrate Judge.

Case 2:12-cv-01284-GMS Document 29 Filed 08/24/12 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

DATED this 23rd day of August, 2012.

Case 2:12-cv-01284-GMS Document 29 Filed 08/24/12 Page 3 of 3