Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02031/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02031-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff initiated this action while a prisoner and is proceeding pro se in a civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. On May 29, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to compel 

responses from Plaintiff to their special interrogatories as well as their requests for production and 

upon which they seek monetary sanctions. (Doc. 31.) On June 22, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion 

for a six month extension of time. (Doc. 32.) However, on July 2, 2015, an order issued denying 

his motion without prejudice for lack of specificity. (Doc. 33.) To date, Plaintiff has filed 

nothing further. Plaintiff is being given one last opportunity to file an opposition or a statement 

of non-opposition to the motion within 21 days of the date of service of this order. Local Rule 

230(l). Failure to do so will be viewed as a lack of prosecution of this action and will result in a 

recommendation the matter be dismissed.

DWAIN ALAN PETERS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHERMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

1:13-cv-02031-LJO-JLT (PC)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO 

FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF 

NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY 

RESPONSES 

(Doc. 31)

21-DAY DEADLINE

Case 1:13-cv-02031-LJO-JLT Document 34 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion 

to compel discovery within 21 days from the date of service of this order; and

2. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal 

of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 3, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-02031-LJO-JLT Document 34 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 2