Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05625/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05625-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

TRACY A PrCl ofovi esA. AGRA sPion s.O, Cal. Bal Cor ifox 3 orpor niaLL365 936 ation13-3365

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER - CASE NUMBER CV-F-04-5625 REC LJO

Page 1 of 2

Tracy A. Agrall (SBN 100013) 

TRACY A. AGRALL

A Professional Corporation

P.O. Box 3365

Clovis, CA 93613-3365

Telephone: (559) 299-1135

Facsimile: (559) 299-1108

Attorney for Ronald Kuber, Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION

RONALD KUBER, individually and dba

CONNOR MARKETING,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO. INC., a

Delaware Corporation; BIOVANCE

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware

Corporation, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case Number: CV-F-04-5625 REC LJO

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their counsel

of record, that the above entitled case shall be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. 

Dated: ______________________________

Dated: _____________________________

TRACY A. AGRALL, a professional

 corporation

By: _______________/s/_______________

 Tracy A. Agrall, attorneys for Plaintiff

COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

By:________________/s/_______________

 Darryl J. Horowitt, attorneys for 

 Defendants

Case 1:04-cv-05625-AWI-LJO Document 19 Filed 01/09/07 Page 1 of 2
TRACY A PrCl ofovi esA. AGRA sPion s.O, Cal. Bal Cor ifox 3 orpor niaLL365 936 ation13-3365

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER - CASE NUMBER CV-F-04-5625 REC LJO

Page 2 of 2

ORDER

The parties seek dismissal of this action. Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. Rule 41(a)(1), in relevant part, reads:

an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court

(i) by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the

adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgment,

whichever first occurs, or (ii) by filing a stipulation of dismissal

signed by all parties who have appeared in the action. Unless

otherwise stated in the notice of dismissal or stipulation, the

dismissal is without prejudice, except that a notice of dismissal

operates as an adjudication upon the merits when filed by a

plaintiff who has once dismissed in any court of the United States

or of any state an action based on or including the same claim.

Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after service of an

answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed by all of the parties who have appeared,

although an oral stipulation in open court will also suffice. Carter v. Beverly Hills Sav. & Loan

Asso., 884 F.2d 1186, 1191 (9th Cir. 1989); Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1472-73 (9th Cir.

1986). Because Plaintiff has filed a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice as to all parties under

Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) that is signed by all parties who have made an appearance, this case has

terminated. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)(ii).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED and the

Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case in light of the parties’ filed and signed Rule

41(a)(1)(ii) Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05625-AWI-LJO Document 19 Filed 01/09/07 Page 2 of 2