Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01444/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01444-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGINA THOMAS, )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

)

BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND )

SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, )

et al., )

)

)

Defendant. )

)

)

NO. CV-F-05-1444 OWW/DLB

ORDER VACATING ORAL ARGUMENT

ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT SET FOR APRIL 9 AND

APRIL 23, 2004 AND DIRECTING

DEFENDANTS TO RE-NOTICE

MOTIONS FOR HEARING 

The hearings noticed for Defendants' respective motions for

summary judgment set for April 9 and April 23, 2007 are vacated

pending Plaintiff's retention of new counsel by June 1, 2007. On

June 5, 2007, Defendants may re-notice the motions for hearing

pursuant to Rule 78-230, Local Rules of Practice.

Plaintiff is advised that she will be granted no further

continuances of the motions for summary, even if she retains new

counsel. If Plaintiff does not retain new counsel, she is

advised that Rule 83-183(a), Local Rules of Practice provides in

Case 1:05-cv-01444-OWW -DLB Document 86 Filed 04/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

pertinent part:

Any individual representing ... herself

without an attorney is bound by the Federal

Rules of Civil ... Procedure and by these

Local Rules. All obligations placed on

'counsel' by these Local Rules apply to

persons appearing in propria persona. 

Failure to comply therewith may be ground for

dismissal, judgment by default, or any other

sanction appropriate under these Rules.

Plaintiff is further advised that she must comply with Rule 56-

260, Local Rules of Practice, in filing oppositions to the

respective motions for summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 3, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01444-OWW -DLB Document 86 Filed 04/03/07 Page 2 of 2