Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00688/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00688-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:185 Employee Pension Plan

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

A conclusory statement reiterating that counsel is “unavailable” will not suffice to

show good cause to change the date of the case management conference.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE MORENO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

FERMA CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants /

No. 05-0688 MMC

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF

UNAVAILABILITY 

The Court is in receipt of a Notice of Unavailability, filed by defendants on June 7,

2004, in which defendants’ counsel states he is unavailable to, inter alia, attend court

hearings from June 10, 2005 through June 19, 2004.

The initial case management conference for the above-titled action has been

scheduled for June 17, 2005, at 10:30 a.m. (See Pretrial Preparation Order, filed February

15, 2005.) If defendants wish to change the date of the case management conference,

defendants must file a stipulation, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, or a motion to change

time, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3, and, in either case, must show good cause for any

continuance or other change of the scheduled date.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 7, 2005 /s/ Maxine M. Chesney 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00688-MMC Document 8 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 1