Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05215/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05215-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

N:\Pro - Se\8.17.2007\06-05215 Golden05215_dismissal.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THEOTIS GOLDEN,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

GEORGE W. KENNEDY, et al.,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-05215 JW (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, a California state inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights

complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All claims were dismissed except a claim

of excessive force, which was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff was given

thirty days to file an amended complaint from March 2, 2007, the date of the order

of dismissal. Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28

U.S.C. § 1915 in the same order. 

Plaintiff was granted an extension of time of thirty days on April 5, 2007, to

file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was advised in the order of dismissal and the

order granting the extension of time that failure to file an amended complaint “will

result in dismissal of the complaint for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 41(b).” 

Case 5:06-cv-05215-JW Document 18 Filed 08/17/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal

N:\Pro - Se\8.17.2007\06-05215 Golden05215_dismissal.wpd 2

The deadline has since passed, and plaintiff has failed to file an amended

complaint or request another extension of time to do so. Accordingly, this case is

DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 41(b). 

The clerk shall terminate any pending motions. 

DATED: August 2, 2007 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge 

Case 5:06-cv-05215-JW Document 18 Filed 08/17/07 Page 2 of 2