Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01365/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01365-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANNY ATTERBURY, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1365 DAD P

vs.

LAURIE VAN DIVER,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On August 2, 2007 defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. However, on August

10, 2007 and on August 14, 2007, plaintiff filed two notices with the court stating that he is

unable to respond to the motion at this time. The court has construed the notices as requests for

extensions of time. The court will grant plaintiff thirty days from the date of this order to file an

opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff is advised that under, Local

Rule 78-230(m), “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement

of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the

date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the defendant’s motion for summary

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01365-DAD Document 62 Filed 02/21/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and

shall result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: February 20, 2008.

DAD:9

atte1365.46

Case 2:05-cv-01365-DAD Document 62 Filed 02/21/08 Page 2 of 2