Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02565/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02565-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CORAZON H. ZAMBRANO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the

United States,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 06-02565 JSW

TENTATIVE RULING AND

QUESTIONS FOR HEARING ON

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, PLEASE TAKE

NOTICE OF THE FOLLOWING TENTATIVE RULING AND QUESTIONS FOR THE

HEARING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 29, 2007 AT 9:00 A.M.:

The Court has reviewed the parties’ papers and, thus, does not wish to hear the parties

reargue matters addressed in those pleadings. If the parties intend to rely on authorities not

cited in their briefs, they are ORDERED to notify the Court and opposing counsel of these

authorities reasonably in advance of the hearing and to make copies available at the hearing. If

the parties submit such additional authorities, they are ORDERED to submit the citations to the

authorities only, without argument or additional briefing. Cf. N.D. Civil Local Rule 7-3(d). 

The parties will be given the opportunity at oral argument to explain their reliance on such

authority.

The Court tentatively GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Case 3:06-cv-02565-JSW Document 27 Filed 06/26/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The parties shall each have 10 minutes to address the following questions:

1. Does Plaintiff maintain that she was terminated due to her age, as well as her race?

2. What evidence does Plaintiff have to dispute Defendant’s stated non-discriminatory

reason for her termination, that is, that Plaintiff violated the United States Postal

Service’ explicit Zero Tolerance Policy?

3. Do the parties have anything further they wish to address?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 06/26/07 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-02565-JSW Document 27 Filed 06/26/07 Page 2 of 2