Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00296/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00296-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VESTA FIRE INSURANCE CORP., ) 02:04-cv-0296-GEB-PAN

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

INSURANCE VENTURES, INC.; PAUL )

MCNEECE ROESSER; RONALD CLARK )

COLTON; STEPHANIE FRANCIS SMITH; )

CARL FRANK; LAW OFFICES OF COLTON )

& ROESSER; DOES 1 THROUGH 10, )

)

 Defendants. )

)

On November 23, 2005, a facsimile from Plaintiff’s counsel

was delivered to the undersigned judge’s chambers. Apparently, the

facsimile was originally sent to the Magistrate Judge and subsequently

hand-delivered to chambers. Local Rule 5-133(e)(4) states that

“[d]ocuments directly faxed . . . to a chambers of the Court will not

be . . . received, [or] returned . . . .” Therefore, the facsimile

sent by Plaintiff’s counsel was destroyed without being reviewed by

the Court. Counsel is directed to Local Rule 5-133 for instructions

on how to properly file documents with the Court. 

Dated: November 15, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00296-GEB-EFB Document 203 Filed 11/16/05 Page 1 of 1