Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-00880/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-00880-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kathleen C. Campbell, individually and as

the successor in interest of Ruth C.

Pritchard, Deceased, Capitol Enquiry Inc.;

and Capital Education, Inc.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

Judy Fernando-Sholes and Bruce A.

Sholes, individually and as husband and

wife; Bruce A. Sholes, doing business as

Law Offices of Bruce A. Sholes; Oasis at

Wild Horse Ranch, LLC, an Arizona

limited liability company; John C.

Kubasch, individually, and John C.

Kubasch and Jane Doe Kubasch, husband

and wife; and Does 1-20,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-05-0880-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation (Doc. 79) to Extend Defendant Sholes's Deadline to

File Reply in Support of Motion to Set Aside or Amend Default Judgment and to Establish

Deadline for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant's Pending Motion to Strike, and good cause

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Bruce A. Sholes ("Sholes") shall not be

required to file a reply brief in support of his Motion to Set Aside or Amend Default Judgment

until five (5) days after either (I) the Court denies Sholes's pending Motion to Strike Plaintiffs'

Opposition to Defendant Sholes's Motion to Set Aside or Amend Default Judgment ("Motion

to Strike") or (ii) upon the granting of the Motion to Strike, Plaintiffs file a revised Opposition

Case 2:05-cv-00880-SMM Document 80 Filed 09/23/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

to Defendant Sholes's Motion to Set Aside or Amend Default Judgment in accordance with the

Court's ruling.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall have until October 2, 2008 to file a

response to Sholes's Motion to Strike.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING as MOOT Defendant’s Motion to Expedite

Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Strike. (Doc. 78.)

DATED this 23rd day of September, 2008.

Case 2:05-cv-00880-SMM Document 80 Filed 09/23/08 Page 2 of 2