Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00355/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00355-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -1- 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FUJI PHOTO FILM U.S.A., INC.’S CASE NO. 03-cv-00355 MJJ 

MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5 

NY02:576847.1

Matt Gonzalez (153486) 

G. Whitney Leigh (153457) 

Eumi K. Lee (209481) 

GONZALEZ & LEIGH, LLP 

Two Shaw Alley, Third Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 512-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 512-2001 

Robert C. Scheinfeld 

Jeffrey D. Sullivan 

Eliot D. Williams

Eric J. Faragi 

BAKER BOTTS, L.L.P. 

30 Rockefeller Plaza, 44th Floor 

New York, New York 10112 

Telephone: (212) 408-2500 

Facsimile: (212) 408-2501 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

Attorneys For Defendant, 

FUJI PHOTO FILM U.S.A., INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

LEXAR MEDIA, INC., 

 Plaintiff-Counterdefendant, 

v. 

FUJI PHOTO FILM U.S.A., INC., 

 Defendant-Counterclaimant. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

FUJI PHOTO FILM U.S.A., INC.’S 

MISCELLANEOUS 

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO 

SEAL DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5 

Case No. 03-cv-00355 MJJ 

 Upon good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following documents shall 

be received and filed under seal by the Clerk: 

Case 3:03-cv-00355-MJJ Document 399 Filed 03/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 -2- 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FUJI PHOTO FILM U.S.A., INC.’S CASE NO. 03-cv-00355 MJJ 

MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5 

NY02:576847.1

1. Exhibit A to Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc.’s Consolidated Opposition to Lexar 

Media Inc.’s and Acclaim Innovations, LLC’s Motions In Limine (Expert Report of Dr. V. 

Thomas Rhyne); 

2. Exhibit B to Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc.’s Consolidated Opposition to Lexar 

Media Inc.’s and Acclaim Innovations, LLC’s Motions In Limine (PC Card Trade Show 

Documentation (FJB 052140-50 and translations thereof)); 

3. Exhibit C to Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc.’s Consolidated Opposition to Lexar 

Media Inc.’s and Acclaim Innovations, LLC’s Motions In Limine (Portions of the Deposition 

Testimony of John Bock, taken on January 31, 2006 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 30(b)(6)); 

4. Exhibit D to Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc.’s Consolidated Opposition to Lexar 

Media Inc.’s and Acclaim Innovations, LLC’s Motions In Limine (Portions of the Deposition 

Testimony of Anthony Sorice, taken on January 30, 2006 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 

30(b)(6)); and 

5. The Highlighted version of Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc.’s Consolidated 

Opposition to Lexar Media Inc.’s and Acclaim Innovations, LLC’s Motions In Limine. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

San Francisco, California 

 , 2007 

 Dated 

 Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

 United States District Court Judge 

3/15

Case 3:03-cv-00355-MJJ Document 399 Filed 03/19/07 Page 2 of 2