Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00418/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00418-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Case No. 1:13-CV-00418-LJO-SKO- STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO AMEND CASE 

MANAGEMENT ORDER 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114) 

JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268) 

GINA ALTOMARE (State Bar No. 273099) 

GENEVIEVE K. GUERTIN (State Bar No. 262479) 

HADDAD & SHERWIN 

505 Seventeenth Street 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 452-5500 

Fax: (510) 452-5510 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

JAIME REYES, JR., MIRELLA REYES and 

JAIME REYES, SR. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAIME REYES JR. Deceased, 

THROUGH HIS SUCESSORS IN 

INTEREST MIRELLA REYES and 

JAIME REYES SR.; MIRELLA REYES, 

Individually; and JAIME REYES SR., 

Individually, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

CITY OF FRESNO, a public entity, CITY 

OF FRESNO POLICE CHIEF JERRY 

DYER in his individual and official 

capacities, FRESNO POLICE OFFICER 

JUAN AVILA, FRESNO POLICE 

OFFICER MIGUEL ALVAREZ, 

individually, and DOES 3 through 10, 

Jointly and Severally, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:13-CV-00418-LJO-SKO 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT 

ORDER 

Case 1:13-cv-00418-DAD-SKO Document 42 Filed 12/19/13 Page 1 of 5
Case No. 1:13-CV-00418-LJO-SKO- STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO AMEND CASE 

MANAGEMENT ORDER 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ALL PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY 

STIPULATE, AND REQUEST THIS COURT TO ORDER, THAT the case management order 

be amended as follows: 

 This is a complex wrongful-death civil rights case with 4 named Defendants and 8 

remaining Doe Defendants. The parties have exchanged initial disclosures, exchanged some 

written discovery and produced some documents and records. The parties have met and conferred, 

and will continue to do so, regarding additional document production. The parties are in the 

process of scheduling the depositions of the two named individual Defendants, as well as of 

Plaintiffs and multiple witnesses for dates beginning in late-January. 

 Plaintiffs served their request for production of documents on Defendants on June 7, 2013. 

The parties have met and conferred extensively regarding document production and have agreed 

on a production date of January 10, 2014. 

 Due to the need for additional time for document production, as well as the number of 

Defendants and witnesses who must still be deposed, the parties anticipate that discovery will not 

be complete by the current deadline of February 14, 2014. The parties, therefore, stipulate to 

continue the deadlines for the completion of fact discovery and expert disclosures from February 

14, 2014 to March 14, 2014. This is the first request for extension of such deadlines. 

 Therefore, the parties respectfully request that this Court continue the current deadlines in 

this matter as follows: 

Deadline Description Current Deadline/Date Proposed Modified 

Deadline/Date 

Completion of Non-Expert 

Discovery 

February 14, 2014 March 14, 2014 

Disclosure of Expert Witnesses’ 

Identities and Reports 

February 14, 2014 March 14, 2014 

Case 1:13-cv-00418-DAD-SKO Document 42 Filed 12/19/13 Page 2 of 5
Case No. 1:13-CV-00418-LJO-SKO- STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO AMEND CASE 

MANAGEMENT ORDER 

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Disclosure of Rebuttal Expert 

Witnesses 

February 28, 2014 March 28, 2014 

Dispositive Motion Hearing 

Deadline 

July 9, 2014 No change 

Settlement Conference April 3, 2014, 10:00 a.m. No change 

Completion of Expert Discovery April 18, 2014 No change 

Pretrial Conference August 20, 2014 No change 

Trial October 7, 2014 No change 

 Additionally, due to the aforementioned circumstances, the parties also stipulate that 

Plaintiffs shall have until February 17, 2014 to amend their Complaint for the purpose of naming 

Doe Defendants only. This stipulation extends the current deadline of December 20, 2013. Other 

than for the purposes of naming Doe Defendants, nothing in this Stipulation, nor any associated 

Order, shall be construed so as to modify or otherwise extend the deadline for amendment of 

pleadings in any other regard beyond the previous October 31, 2013 deadline. 

SO STIPULATED: 

DATED: December 16, 2013 HADDAD & SHERWIN 

 /s/ Michael J. Haddad* 

MICHAEL J. HADDAD 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAIME REYES, JR., 

 MIRELLA REYES and JAIME REYES, SR. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

Case 1:13-cv-00418-DAD-SKO Document 42 Filed 12/19/13 Page 3 of 5
Case No. 1:13-CV-00418-LJO-SKO- STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO AMEND CASE 

MANAGEMENT ORDER 

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: December 17, 2013 MANNING & KASS, 

 ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER, LLP 

 /s/ Tony M. Sain* 

 MILDRED K. O’LINN 

 TONY M. SAIN 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

*Mr. Haddad Mr. Sain provided their consent that this document be electronically filed. 

Case 1:13-cv-00418-DAD-SKO Document 42 Filed 12/19/13 Page 4 of 5
Case No. 1:13-CV-00418-LJO-SKO- STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO AMEND CASE 

MANAGEMENT ORDER 

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

 Pursuant to stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 18, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:13-cv-00418-DAD-SKO Document 42 Filed 12/19/13 Page 5 of 5