Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00091/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00091-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS RAMIREZ, JR., )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

SILGAN CONTAINERS, SILGAN )

CONTAINERS CORPORATION, )

SILGAN CONTAINERS )

MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, )

SUE ASHLEY, ARNOLD NEIMARK, )

COMPANY, and DOES 1 through )

50, inclusive, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CIV F 07-0091 AWI DLB

ORDER MOVING HEARING

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS AND 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO AMEND, AND

ALLOWING REPLY TO

DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION

TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

Currently set for hearing on April 2, 2007, are Defendant Naimark (erroneously identified as

Neimark)’s motion to dismiss and Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend. Plaintiff filed his motion in

partial response to Naimark’s motion to dismiss. See Local Rule 78-230(e). As part of his reply

memorandum, Naimark also made arguments in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend. 

Given Plaintiff’s motion, and in particular that Naimark has responded in opposition to Plaintiff’s

motion, the Court believes that it is necessary to allow Plaintiff to file a reply, which necessitates the

moving of the April 2, 2007, hearing date. See id. Further, the parties have filed a stipulation to move

the hearing to April 16, 2007.

Case 1:07-cv-00091-AWI-DLB Document 20 Filed 03/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The April 2, 2007, hearing date on Defendant’s motion to dismiss and Plaintiff’s motion for

leave to amend is VACATED;

2. The hearing date on Defendant’s motion to dismiss and Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend is

now April 16, 2007, at 1:30 p.m.; and

3. Plaintiff may file a reply brief in support of his motion for leave to amend on or by April 9,

2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

ciem0h UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00091-AWI-DLB Document 20 Filed 03/30/07 Page 2 of 2