Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01143/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01143-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

- 1 – 

[Proposed] Stipulation and Order to Extend time to File Motion 

to Compel Answers to Interrogs. Watkins v. Depee, et al. 

 Case No. C-05 1143-SI

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Law Offices of 

Tory M. Pankopf 

611 Sierra Rose Drive 

Reno, NV 89511 

(530) 725-8263

BEATIFICATO & ASSOCIATES 

Mary Helen Beatificato (State Bar No.: 220936) 

2 Venture Plaza, Suite 380 

Irvine, California 92618 

Telephone: (949) 585-0483 

Facsimile: (949) 585-0480 

E-Mail: mh@oclitigators.com

Tory M. Pankopf (SBN 202581) 

LAW OFFICES OF TORY M. PANKOPF 

611 Sierra Rose Drive 

Reno, Nevada 89511 

Telephone: (530) 725-8263 Fax: (530) 725-8264 

Email: tppankopf@sbcglobal.net 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYLVIA MAHACH-WATKINS, 

Individually and as the Successor in 

Interest to the Estate of JOHN JOSEPH 

WAYNE WATKINS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

LARRY DEPEE, STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA, and DOES 1 through 100, 

Inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

 CASE NO: C-05-1143-SI 

[Proposed] STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTION 

TO COMPEL 

[LR-26-2] 

Date: 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 10, 19th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Susan Illston

Plaintiff SYLVIA MAHACH-WATKINS, by and through her undersigned counsel, and 

Defendants’ LARRY DEPEE and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through their 

undersigned counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 26-2, stipulate to extend time for Defendants’ to 

file their motion to compel further responses to first and second sets of interrogatories to 

September 21, 2006. 

Case 3:05-cv-01143-SI Document 51 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cv-01143-SI Document 52 Filed 08/31/06 Page 1 of 2
 

 - 2 – 

[Proposed] Stipulation and Order to Extend time to File Motion 

to Compel Answers to Interrogs. Watkins v. Depee, et al. 

 Case No. C-05 1143-SI

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Law Offices of 

Tory M. Pankopf 

611 Sierra Rose Drive 

Reno, NV 89511 

(530) 725-8263

The purpose for the stipulation is that the Plaintiff has agreed to provide Defendants 

with supplemental responses to their first and second sets of interrogatories. Plaintiff has 

agreed to provide her supplemental responses by September 14, 2006. Defendants’ counsel will 

be unavailable until September 18, 2006. So, Defendant’s counsel will need until September 

21, 2006, to review Plaintiff’s supplemental responses and determine whether he feels the 

responses are responsive or whether he will need to file a motion to compel further responses. 

SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: August 30, 2006 BEATIFICATO & ASSOCIATES 

 BY:_/S/ MARY H. BEATIFICATO 

 MARY H. BEATIFICATO

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DATED: August 30, 2006 

 BY:_/S/ DAVID W. HAMILTON 

 DAVID W. HAMILTION

 Deputy Attorney General 

Attorney for Defendants 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August ____, 2006 

 ___________________________

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-01143-SI Document 51 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:05-cv-01143-SI Document 52 Filed 08/31/06 Page 2 of 2