Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-103/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL

CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MEDIATEK, INC., et al.,

Defendants

 

MEDIATEK, INC,

Counterclaimant,

 v.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL

CO., LTD., et al.

Counterclaim Defendants /

No. 05-3148 MMC 

ORDER GRANTING DEFERRED

PORTION OF PLAINTIFF’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

Before the Court is the deferred portion of plaintiff’s administrative motion, filed May

4, 2007, to file under seal certain documents submitted in support of plaintiff’s reply in

support of its motion for summary judgment.

The deferred portion of plaintiff’s motion pertains to “Exhibit 18 to Declaration of Aldo

A. Badini in Support of Matsushita’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment.” 

Good cause appearing from the Declaration of Vincent Hong, filed May 24, 2007 on behalf

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1160 Filed 05/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Declarant Vincent Hong also asserts that a portion of page 12 in “Response to

MediaTek’s Objections to Evidence Offered in Support of Matsushita’s Motion for Summary

Judgment” (“Response”) is sealable. Because the unredacted version of the Response has

already been filed under seal, (see Order, filed May 18, 2007, Docket #1107), and the

redacted version does not include the portion referenced by the declarant, (see Docket

#966), no additional action need be taken by the Court.

2

of non-parties ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International, plaintiff’s

motion is hereby GRANTED as it pertains to Exhibit 18, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file

said exhibit under seal.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 30, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1160 Filed 05/30/07 Page 2 of 2