Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05922/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05922-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDOLPH ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. CV-F-04-5922 AWI LJO P

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

RETURN PROPOSED SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT TO PLAINTIFF

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF A THIRTYDAY EXTENSION TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO

THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 13)

ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(Doc. 14)

Plaintiff Randolph Allen (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 16, 2005, the court

issued a Findings and Recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to

state any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. Plaintiff was informed that

if he wished to file objections, he must do so within thirty days. On April 11, 2005, plaintiff

submitted a proposed second amended complaint but did not file objections.

Plaintiff was not granted leave to file a second amended complaint. If plaintiff believes that

his claims are cognizable under section 1983, plaintiff’s recourse is to file objections to the Findings

and Recommendations. The Clerk’s Office shall be directed to return plaintiff’s proposed second

amended complaint to him and the court will grant plaintiff an additional thirty days to file

Case 1:04-cv-05922-AWI-LJO Document 15 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections to the Findings and Recommendations. If plaintiff fails to file objections within thirty

days, the Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to Judge Ishii.

Finally, on April 22, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma

pauperis. Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action on August 2, 2004.

Therefore, it is unnecessary for plaintiff to file any further motions seeking leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and plaintiff’s motion shall be stricken from the record.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk’s Office shall return plaintiff’s proposed second amended complaint to

him; 

2. ` Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order within

which to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations filed on March 16,

2005; and

3. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, filed April 22, 2005, is stricken from

the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 7, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05922-AWI-LJO Document 15 Filed 05/09/05 Page 2 of 2