Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04803/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04803-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AUTHOBAHN MOTORS, INC,

Plaintiff,

v.

MASKAY CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-04803-JST 

ORDER VACATING HEARINGS

Re: ECF Nos. 7, 8

On October 19, 2015, Defendants removed this case from San Mateo County Superior 

Court. ECF No. 2. On October 20, 2015, Defendants filed a motions to strike and to dismiss. 

ECF Nos. 7, 8. One week later, the Court continued the hearings on those motions until December 

1, 2015. ECF No. 17. Plaintiff has now filed a motion to remand, which it has noticed for hearing 

on December 1, 2015. ECF No. 19. In its motion to remand, Plaintiff argues that the Court does 

not have subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Id. at 4. 

Because the Court must first determine whether it has subject matter jurisdiction before it 

can rule on Defendant’s motions to strike and to dismiss, the Court now vacates the hearings on 

those motions, as well as the briefing schedules set forth in ECF No. 17. If the Court concludes 

that it has subject matter jurisdiction and denies Plaintiff’s motion to remand, the Court will issue 

an order re-scheduling the hearings on Defendants’ motions and setting forth a new briefing 

schedule. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 27, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-04803-JST Document 20 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 1