Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01780/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01780-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY D. EASLEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1780 FCD DAD PS

vs.

COUNTY OF EL DORADO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On February 3, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

analysis.

///// 

Case 2:05-cv-01780-FCD-DAD Document 17 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 3, 2006, are adopted in full;

and 

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See L.R. 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(b).

DATED: June 8, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/easley1780.jo

Case 2:05-cv-01780-FCD-DAD Document 17 Filed 06/08/06 Page 2 of 2