Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_14-cv-00437/USCOURTS-almd-2_14-cv-00437-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

TIMOTHY RAY FOX, #278599, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-437-WHA

 ) [WO] 

KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al., )

)

 Defendants. )

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 27, 2014, the court entered an order granting Plaintiff fourteen days to file

an amended complaint. See Doc. No. 6. Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to comply

with the court’s June 27 order would result in a Recommendation that his complaint be

dismissed. Id. The requisite time has passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the order

of the court. Consequently, the court concludes that dismissal of this case is appropriate for

Plaintiff’s failures to prosecute this action and comply with the order of the court.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case

be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failures to prosecute this action and comply

with the order of this court.

It is further

ORDERED that on or before January 20, 2015, Plaintiff may file an objection to the 

Recommendation Anyobjection filed must specificallyidentifythe findingsin theMagistrate

Judge's Recommendation to which Plaintiff objects. Frivolous, conclusive or general

Case 2:14-cv-00437-WHA-SRW Document 8 Filed 01/06/15 Page 1 of 2
objections will not be considered by the District Court. Plaintiff is advised this

Recommendation is not a final order and, therefore, it is not appealable.

Failure to file a written objection to the proposed findings and recommendations in

the Magistrate Judge's report shall bar Plaintiff from a de novo determination by the District

Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar Plaintiff from attacking on appeal factual

findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain

error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5 Cir. 1982). See Stein th

v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11 Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of th

Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11 Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the th

decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on

September 30, 1981.

DONE, this 6 day of January 2015. th

 /s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:14-cv-00437-WHA-SRW Document 8 Filed 01/06/15 Page 2 of 2