Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02042/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02042-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

PENDING MOTIONS

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 CRB

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838 

STEVEN D. GUGGENHEIM, State Bar No. 201386 

CAMERON P. HOFFMAN, State Bar No. 229316 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Email: chowald@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Brocade 

Communications Systems, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PRENA SMAJLAJ, Individually and On Behalf 

of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC., GREGORY L. REYES, ANTONIO 

CANOVA, LARRY W. SONSINI, SETH D. 

NEIMAN and NEAL DEMPSEY, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 3:05-cv-2042 CRB 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE PENDING MOTIONS 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 364 Filed 09/20/07 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

PENDING MOTIONS

-1- CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 CRB

STIPULATION 

WHEREAS, currently pending before the Court are the following motions: (1) Brocade’s 

motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for summary adjudication of claims; (2) 

APERS’ motion to deny Brocade’s motion for summary judgment and alternative motion to 

continue hearing on Brocade’s motion for summary judgment and to compel discovery; (3) 

APERS’ motion to strike the declaration of Fredrick C. Dunbar and to deny Brocade’s motion 

for summary judgment; 

WHEREAS, APERS’ motions seek certain expert and document discovery relevant to 

responding to Brocade’s summary judgment motion; 

WHEREAS, the parties have reached agreement with respect to the expert and document 

discovery requested by APERS, as well as reciprocal discovery requested by Brocade; 

WHEREAS, the parties are working on a mutually acceptable schedule regarding such 

discovery, and will inform the Court of any agreed upon schedule; 

WHEREAS, if the parties cannot agree on such a schedule or a dispute arises with respect 

to the scope of discovery they will seek the Court’s assistance in resolving the dispute; 

WHEREAS, the agreements reached by the parties have mooted APERS’ motions; 

WHEREAS, this stipulation does not effect APERS’ other pending motions set for 

hearing on October 12, namely: (1); APERS’ motion for class certification, (2) APERS’ motion 

to strike Brocade’s supplemental response to lead plaintiff’s first set of requests for admissions 

and interrogatories, and (3) APERS’ motion for partial summary judgment against Greg Reyes 

on elements (1-4) of Count I in APERS’ amended consolidated class action complaint; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, 

subject to approval of the Court, that: 

• Brocade’s motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for summary 

adjudication of claims, shall be continued. The parties will inform the Court once 

they have determined a mutually agreeable schedule for discovery and briefing on 

Brocade’s motion for summary judgment, and the hearing shall be reset at that 

time; 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 364 Filed 09/20/07 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

PENDING MOTIONS

-2- CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 CRB

• APERS’ motion to deny Brocade’s motion for summary judgment and alternative 

motion to continue hearing on Brocade’s motion for summary judgment and to 

compel discovery is hereby withdrawn; and 

• APERS’ motion to strike the declaration of Fredrick C. Dunbar and to deny 

Brocade’s motion for summary judgment is hereby withdrawn. 

Dated: September 18, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Steven D. Guggenheim 

Steven D. Guggenheim 

Attorneys for Defendant Brocade 

Communications Systems, Inc. 

Dated: September 18, 2007 NIX, PATTERSON & ROACH, L.L.P. 

205 Linda Drive 

Daingerfield, TX 75638 Telephone: (903) 645-7333 

Facsimile: (903) 645-4415 

By: /s/ Bradley E. Beckworth 

 Bradley E. Beckworth 

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the 

Proposed Class 

 PATTON, ROBERTS, MCWILLIAMS 

& CAPSHAW, LLP 

Century Bank Plaza 

2900 St. Michael Drive, Suite 400 

 Texarkana, TX 75505-6128 

 Telephone: 903-334-7000 

 Facsimile: 903-330-7007 

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the 

Proposed Class 

KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 

555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1501 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

 Telephone: 415-772-4700 

 Facsimile: 415-772-4707 

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the 

Proposed Class 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 364 Filed 09/20/07 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

PENDING MOTIONS

-3- CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 CRB

 [PROPOSED] ORDER 

For good cause appearing, the foregoing stipulation is approved. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________________ 

THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

 United States District Judge 

September 12, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 364 Filed 09/20/07 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

PENDING MOTIONS

-4- CASE NO. 3:05-CV-2042 CRB

 I, Steve Guggenheim, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being 

used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Pending Motions. In compliance 

with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Thomas Christopher and Bradley E. Beckworth 

have concurred in this filing. 

Dated: September 18, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Steven D. Guggenheim 

Steven D. Guggenheim 

Attorneys for Defendant Brocade 

Communications Systems, Inc. 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 364 Filed 09/20/07 Page 5 of 5