Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-05287/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-05287-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1319 Clean Water Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFF 1 Case No. 3:17-cv-05287-JST

TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

ANDREW L. PACKARD (State Bar No. 168690)

WILLIAM N. CARLON (State Bar No. 305739)

Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard

245 Kentucky Street, Suite B3

Petaluma, CA 94952

Tel: (707) 782-4060

Fax: (707) 782-4062

E-mail: andrew@packardlawoffices.com wncarlon@packardlawoffices.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CALIFORNIANS FOR

ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIANS FOR 

ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, 

 Plaintiff,

vs.

SCHNEIDER DOCK & INTERMODAL 

FACILITY, INC. and RYAN 

SCHNEIDER, 

 Defendants,

Case No. 3:17-cv-05287-JST

STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Hon. Judge Jon S. Tigar

Plaintiff Californians for Alternatives to Toxics ("Plaintiff") and Schneider Dock & 

Intermodal Facility and Ryan Schneider (“Defendants”) by and through their respective 

counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS on July 13, 2017 Plaintiff provided David Schneider and Ryan 

Schneider with Plaintiff’s Notice of Violations and Intent to File Suit (“NOV”);

WHEREAS on September 12, 2017 Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this matter 

(Docket No. 1), setting forth causes of action under the Federal Water Pollution Control 

Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 to 1387 against only Schneider Dock & Intermodal Facility, Inc. 

Case 3:17-cv-05287-JST Document 31 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFF 2 Case No. 3:17-cv-05287-JST

TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

and Ryan Schneider;

WHEREAS on October 30, 2017, Defendants filed with this Court (Docket No. 15) 

their answer responding to the Complaint;

WHEREAS Plaintiff now seeks to amend the Complaint to include David Schneider 

as an owner of the owner of Defendants’ facility.

WHEREAS after a responsive pleading is filed, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

15(a)(2) allows a party to amend its pleading only with the opposing party’s written 

consent or the court’s leave. 

The parties stipulate and agree as follows:

(1) Plaintiff may file a first amended complaint naming David Schneider as an 

additional Defendant in this matter.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: December 18, 2017 Respectfully Submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD

By: _/s/ Andrew L. Packard________ Andrew L. Packard 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CALIFORNIANS FOR

ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS

Dated: December 18, 2017 CANNATA O’TOOLE FICKES ALMAZAN

By: /s/Therese Y. Cannata __ Therese Y. Cannata

Attorneys for Defendants

SCHNEIDER DOCK & INTERMODAL 

FACILITY and RYAN SCHNEIDER

ATTESTATION FOR E-FILING

I hereby attest pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i) (3) that I have obtained concurrence in the 

filing of this document from the other Signatory prior to filing.

DATED: December 18, 2017 By: /s/ Andrew L. Packard______

Case 3:17-cv-05287-JST Document 31 Filed 12/18/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFF 3 Case No. 3:17-cv-05287-JST

TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION

Good cause appearing to allow Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint, IT IS SO 

ORDERED.

Dated: 

Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge

December 18, 2018

Case 3:17-cv-05287-JST Document 31 Filed 12/18/17 Page 3 of 3