Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02252/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02252-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PAYAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHASE BANK, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-02252-KJM-EFB 

ORDER 

All attorneys who wish to appear in the Eastern District of California must be 

admitted to practice or admitted to appear pro hac vice. See L.R. 180. On December 3, 2015, the 

parties submitted a stipulation and proposed order for extension to respond to complaint. ECF 

No. 5. On January 15, 2016, the parties submitted another stipulation and proposed order for 

extension to respond to complaint. ECF No. 6. The court did not resolve the parties’ requests 

because plaintiff’s counsel was not admitted to the Bar of the Eastern District of California. To 

date, plaintiff’s counsel still has not been admitted, despite requests by the clerk’s office and by 

the court. Accordingly, plaintiff’s counsel is hereby ORDERED, within fourteen (14) days of 

entry of this order, to show cause why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for his 

failure to comply with the Local Rules. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 4, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-02252-KJM-EFB Document 7 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 1