Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-1_10-cv-00902/USCOURTS-almd-1_10-cv-00902-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DEMARLOS DAVIS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-902-ID

v. )

) (WO)

MAX ANDREWS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #7), and

Plaintiff's Objection, (Doc. #8). Having conducted a de novo determination of those

portions of the Recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and

ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. #8) be and the same is hereby OVERRULED;

2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #7) be and the same is

hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED;

3. Plaintiff’s claims for monetary damages against Jerry White, Butch Binford,

and Max Andrews be and the same are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice

prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii);

4. Plaintiff’s conspiracy claim be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with

prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and

Case 1:10-cv-00902-ID-WC Document 9 Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 2
5. To the extent the Plaintiff presents claims challenging the constitutionality

of a criminal charge pending against him before the Circuit Court of

Houston County, Alabama, these claims are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE this the 29th day of November, 2010.

/s/ Ira DeMent

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00902-ID-WC Document 9 Filed 11/29/10 Page 2 of 2