Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-5_13-cv-00305/USCOURTS-ared-5_13-cv-00305-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

PINE BLUFF DIVISION 

JUANETTE ROBERTS PLAINTIFF 

v. No. 5:13-cv-305-DPM 

CRESTPARK STUTTGART, LLC; STUTTGART 

VISION CLINIC; GEORGE M. DUNN, JR., ODP A; 

CHERYL CONNALLY; and MISTY COX 

ORDER 

DEFENDANTS 

Roberts' s motion for reconsideration, NQ 61, is denied. Her points about 

retaliation and constructive discharge are re-argument; the Court has already 

addressed them. On discrimination, the Court doesn't see a hearsay problem. 

What Roberts said S.C. said would be hearsay, FED. R. EVID. 801(c), which 

cannot be considered. The Court noted and considered Oliver's affidavit. NQ 

59 at 6. The Court relied on Cox's conclusion after her investigation of S.C.' s 

conduct, not on the resident's exact words. The Court stands by its decision 

that S.C. is not a valid comparator and that there is no jury issue on pretext. 

So Ordered. 

Case 5:13-cv-00305-DPM Document 65 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 1