Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-04620/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-04620-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS C18-cv-04620 YGR

1

DAVID M. HELBRAUN (SBN 129840)

HELBRAUN LAW FIRM

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3340

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 982-4000

Facsimile: (415) 421-0912

dmh@helbraunlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TROY RICHARDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TROY RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS AND 

REHABILITATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C18-cv-04620 YGR

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS

WHEREAS, the twenty-five recently named “Doe” defendants all filed a Motion to 

Dismiss on August 6, 2019; and

WHEREAS, under standard briefing deadlines pursuant to the Northern District’s rules, 

Plaintiff’s Opposition briefing would be due for filing on August 20, 2019; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to a Notice served on defense counsel on July 23, 2019, Plaintiff’s

counsel David M. Helbraun will be out of state on vacation from August 9 through August 19, 

2019, with August 20 being counsel’s first day back in the office from vacation; and

WHEREAS, the parties through their respective counsel have met and conferred to adjust 

the briefing schedule in light of Plaintiff’s counsel’s unavailability August 9 to August 20;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and request that the briefing schedule be 

ORDER GRANTING

Case 4:18-cv-04620-YGR Document 65 Filed 08/08/19 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS C18-cv-04620 YGR 

2

modifies as follows to permit proper briefing by the parties for the Court’s benefit:

Opposition brief to be due on August 27, 2019;

Reply Brief to be due on September 4, 2019; 

Hearing Date to remain September 17, 2019. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: August 7, 2019 CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF JUSTICE

Deputy Attorney General Cassandra Shryock

By:_/s/ Cassandra j. Shryock_ ____________

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: August 7, 2019 David M. Helbraun

HELBRAUN LAW FIRM

By: /s /David M. Helbraun/ __________

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and the circumstances therein described, good cause 

exists to modify the briefing schedule as follows: 

Opposition brief to be due on August 27, 2019; 

Reply Brief to be due on September 4, 2019; 

Hearing Date to remain September 17, 2019. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________ By:______________________________ 

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 

U.S. District Court Judge 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TROY RICHARDSON 

ORDER

August 8, 2019

Case 4:18-cv-04620-YGR Document 65 Filed 08/08/19 Page 2 of 2