Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02353/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02353-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

COOLEY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SAN FRANCISCO

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 

ADMIN MOTION TO SEAL

CASE NO. 3:18-CV-02353-MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COOLEY LLP

JOHN W. CRITTENDEN (101634) (jcrittenden@cooley.com)

101 California Street, 5th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-5800

Telephone: (415) 693-2000

Facsimile: (415) 693-2222

COOLEY LLP

BOBBY GHAJAR (198719) (bghajar@cooley.com)

MARCUS D. PETERSON (265339) (mpeterson@cooley.com)

ROSE KAUTZ (307831) (rkautz@cooley.com)

1333 2nd Street, Suite 400

Santa Monica, CA 90401

Telephone: (310) 883-6400

Facsimile: (310) 883-6500

COOLEY LLP

ANGELA L. DUNNING (212047) (adunning@cooley.com)

JUDD D. LAUTER (290945) (jlauter@cooley.com)

3175 Hanover Street

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130

Telephone: (650) 843-5000

Facsimile: (650) 849-7400

Attorneys for Defendant

CONTEXTLOGIC INC. d/b/a WISH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEALDASH OYJ and DEALDASH INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CONTEXTLOGIC INC. d/b/a WISH,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:18-cv-02353-MMC (JCS)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL

Complaint filed: April 18, 2018

Trial date: August 19, 2019

Case 3:18-cv-02353-MMC Document 135 Filed 04/23/19 Page 1 of 2
COOLEY LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SAN FRANCISCO

1. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMIN MOTION TO SEAL

CASE NO. 3:18-CV-02353-MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant ContextLogic Inc. d/b/a Wish’s (“Wish”) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal 

(“Motion”) was brought before this Court. Upon consideration of the Motion and the supporting 

Declaration of Marcus Peterson, the Court finds there to be good cause and compelling reasons to 

grant Defendants request to file certain documents under seal.

GOOD CAUSE and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court finds that:

1. The designating parties possess overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the 

right of public access to the record of the following documents:

Document Portions Sought to be Sealed

Exhibit B to Declaration of Marcus Peterson in 

support of Defendant’s Objections to 

Magistrate Judge Spero’s Order Denying 

Motion to Compel

• Entire Document

Exhibit C to Declaration of Marcus Peterson in 

support of Defendant’s Objections to 

Magistrate Judge Spero’s Order Denying 

Motion to Compel

• Entire Document

2. The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and

3. No less restrictive means exist to achieve this overriding interest.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Administrative Motion for Leave to File 

Under Seal is GRANTED.

Dated: __________________________ ______________________________________ The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Judge

April 23, 2019

Case 3:18-cv-02353-MMC Document 135 Filed 04/23/19 Page 2 of 2