Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00983/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00983-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIUS LEE JACKSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S- 04-983 LKK GGH P

vs.

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ORDER &

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

1983. By order filed on April 11, 2003, this court directed plaintiff to show cause why defendant

Campbell, for the reasons stated therein, should not be dismissed from this action under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 4(m). In a response, dated April 18, 2005, plaintiff requested dismissal of defendant

Campbell. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff has discharged the court’s show

cause order, filed on April 11, 2005.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m),

defendant Campbell be dismissed from this action.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

Case 2:04-cv-00983-LKK -GGH Document 36 Filed 07/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 6/30/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

jack0983.dis

Case 2:04-cv-00983-LKK -GGH Document 36 Filed 07/01/05 Page 2 of 2