Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00456-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL MANRIQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

HUCHINS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00456-OWW-SMS PC

ORDER DENYINGPLAINTIFF’S MOTIONFOR

STAY OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON

DISCOVERY SCHEDULE AS MOOT (ECF Nos.

54, 64)

AMENDED SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY

ORDER (ECF No. 130)

Amended Pleading Deadline: 09/15/2011

Amended Discovery Deadline: 11/15/2011

Amended Pretrial Dispositive Motion Deadline: 01/13/2012

Plaintiff Daniel Manriquez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the

complaint, filed March 11, 2009, against Defendants J. Huchins, J. Reynoso, M. Hacker, R.

Roberson, C. Munoz, D. Daley, P. Perez, Pax, C. Morse, Omos, and Clausings for cruel and unusual

punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On July 22, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation

to extend the discovery schedule. (ECF No. 130.) 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, the scheduling orderfiled on September 22,

2010, is HEREBY AMENDED as follows:

a. The deadline to file an amended pleading is extended to September 15, 2011;

b. The deadline for the completion of all discovery, including filing motions to

1

Case 1:09-cv-00456-BAM Document 133 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

compel, is extended to November 15, 2011; 

c. The deadline for filing pre-trial dispositive motions is extended to January13,

2012; and

d. A request for an extension of a deadline set in this order must be filed on or

before the expiration of the deadline in question, and will only be granted on

a showing of good cause;

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a stay of briefing schedule, filed March 3, 2011, is DENIED

as moot; and

3. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time on the discovery schedule, filed March 30,

2011, is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 1, 2011 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

cm411 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-00456-BAM Document 133 Filed 08/01/11 Page 2 of 2