Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05219/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05219-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 865
Nature of Suit: Social Security - RSI (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:0405g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

KAREN RUSH PLAINTIFF

v. CIVIL NO. 06-5219

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner

Social Security Administration DEFENDANT

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 9). Plaintiff brought this

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of

the Social Security Administration (Commissioner) finding that plaintiff was not entitled to a waiver

of an alleged overpayment of benefits. (Doc. # 5-1). In a letter addressed to this court, plaintiff’s

counsel has stated that plaintiff and the Commissioner have worked out a payment agreement with

regard to plaintiff’s alleged overpayment. Accordingly, plaintiff now requests that the court dismiss

her Complaint. (Doc. # 9). 

Accordingly, we recommend that plaintiff’s Complaint filed on November 17, 2006, be

dismissed. The parties have ten days from receipt of our report and recommendation in which

to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections

may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that

objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of March 2007. 

 /s/ J. Marschewski

HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-05219-JLH Document 10 Filed 03/16/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>