Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00167/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-00167-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

[APPEARANCES LISTED ON SIGNATURE 

PAGES]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LEXAR MEDIA, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE 

SCHEDULE; SUPPORTING 

DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 138 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 139 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

The parties have met and conferred and agree that a short extension of time will be 

needed to complete dispositive motion briefing. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate that, 

with the Court’s permission, the current schedule set forth in the May 24, 2006 Scheduling Order 

be modified as follows. 

Event May 24, 2006 

Scheduling Order 

Proposed Date 

Opposition briefs due August 25, 2006 September 8, 2006 

Reply briefs due September 1, 2006 September 22, 2006 

The remaining dates in the May 24, 2006 Scheduling Order shall remain in effect. 

By his signature below, counsel for Toshiba attests under penalty of perjury that 

counsel for Lexar concurs in the filing of this Stipulation. 

 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 138 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 139 Filed 08/30/06 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

Dated: August 25, 2006 /s/ Steven Cherensky 

Matthew D. Powers (Bar No. 104795) 

matthew.powers@weil.com 

Steven Cherensky (Bar No. 168275) 

steven.cherensky@weil.com 

Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650) 

chris.cox@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Silicon Valley Office 

201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Telephone: (650) 802-3000 

Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 

Anita E. Kadala 

anita.kadala@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Houston Office 

700 Louisiana, Suite 1600 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 546-5000 

Facsimile: (713) 224-9511 

Attorneys for LEXAR MEDIA, INC. 

Dated: August 25, 2006 /s/ Carl Schlier 

Robert F. McCauley (Bar No. 162056) 

robert.mccauley@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 

Stanford Research Park 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Arthur I. Neustadt 

aneustadt@oblon.com 

Richard D. Kelly 

rkelly@oblon.com 

Carl E. Schlier 

cschlier@oblon.com 

OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & 

NEUSTADT, P.C. 

1940 Duke Street 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

Telephone: (703) 413-3000 

Facsimile: (703) 413-2220 

Attorneys for TOSHIBA CORPORATION 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 138 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 3 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 139 Filed 08/30/06 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF CARL E. SCHLIER 

 I, Carl E. Schlier, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in the State of Virginia, am admitted pro hac 

vice for this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and 

am with the law firm of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, attorneys of record for 

Toshiba Corporation. The matters referred to in this declaration are based on my personal 

knowledge and if called as a witness I could, and would, testify competently to those matters. 

2. The factual representations made above in the above Stipulation are true. 

Recently, the parties have met and conferred and agreed that the schedule in this case should be 

extended, as requested above, to permit the orderly completion of dispositive motion briefing. 

3. There have not been any prior modifications to the Court’s July 28, 2006 

Scheduling Order. The July 28, 2006 Scheduling Order modified the July 14, 2006 Proposed 

Order, which was not entered by the Court. The July 14, 2006 Proposed Order modified the June 

23, 2006 Scheduling Order. The June 23, 2006 Scheduling Order modified the schedule set forth 

in the May 24, 2006 Scheduling Order. The May 24, 2006 Scheduling Order modified the 

schedule set forth in the February 10, 2006 Scheduling Order. The May 24, 2006 Scheduling 

Order also modified the proposed scheduling order submitted by the parties on April 14, 2006, 

which was not entered by the Court. The February 10, 2006 Scheduling Order modified the 

schedule set forth in the June 8, 2005 Scheduling Order. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on August 25, 2006 at Punta 

Cana, Dominican Republic. 

 

 /s/ Carl E. Schlier 

 Carl E. Schlier 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 138 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 4 of 5
 Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 139 Filed 08/30/06 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF CASE SCHEDULE; 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 

Case No. C 03-00167 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________ __________________________________________ 

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 138 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 5 of 5

8/30/2006

Case 3:03-cv-00167-MJJ Document 139 Filed 08/30/06 Page 5 of 5