Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01793/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01793-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 06 1793 JF RS

ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

(DPSAGOK)

*E-FILED 8/11/06*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

PACIFIC NEWS SERVICE,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

James E. TILTON, Acting Secretary of the

California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation, and Robert L. Ayers Jr., Acting

Warden of San Quentin State Prison,

 Defendants.

Case Number C 06 1793 JF RS

DEATH-PENALTY CASE

ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

[]

Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Compel (1) Further Investigation, (2) Supplemental

Interrogatory Responses, (3) Production of Documents, and (4) Production of an Affidavit

Describing Document Search Efforts, with oral argument scheduled on September 13, 2006. In

light of the case-management considerations underlying the district judge’s Order Deferring

Determination of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint as well as the scheduling by the

district judge of the prehearing conference in the related matter of Morales v. Tilton, No. C 06

219 JF RS, on September 13, 2006, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court either will take

Plaintiff’s Motion under submission without oral argument or will defer oral argument on the

Motion until after the evidentiary hearing in Morales, which is scheduled for September 26 to

29, 2006. The briefing schedule for the Motion to Compel shall remain unchanged by the

Case 3:06-cv-01793-RS Document 45 Filed 08/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case No. C 06 1793 JF RS

ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

(DPSAGOK)

present Order. The Court will advise the parties if it desires oral argument or supplemental

briefing following the evidentiary hearing in Morales.

 It is so ordered.

DATED: August 11, 2006 __________________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01793-RS Document 45 Filed 08/11/06 Page 2 of 2