Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05830/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05830-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), both parties consented to the jurisdiction of the United States 1

Magistrate Judge. (Court Docs. 5, 10, 12.) 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD JAMES BISHOP,

Petitioner,

v.

R.A. CASTRO, WARDEN,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 03-5830 DLB HC

ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER’S 

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

[Doc. 32]

On October 20, 2005, the undersigned denied the instant petition for writ of habeas

corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Judgment was entered this same date. 1

On November 4, 2005, Petitioner filed a request for an extension of time to file an

opposition to Respondent’s motion to dismiss. On November 16, 2005, the Court disregarded

Petitioner’s request as there was no motion to dismiss pending in the case. 

On November 21, 2005, Petitioner filed a request for an extension of time to file

objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Petitioner is advised that because both parties

consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the Court’s order of October 20, 2005, was the final

order disposing of the case. Accordingly, Petitioner’s request for an extension of time to file

objections to the Findings and Recommendations is DISREGARDED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 22, 2005 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05830-DLB Document 33 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 1