Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06423/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-06423-53/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF SEC’S MOTION

AND VACATING EVIDENTIARY HEARING [Case No.: C 07-6423 MMC] 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

EDWIN PRATHER, CABN 190536

PRATHER LAW OFFICES

461 Bush Street, Suite 350

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (415) 881-7774

Email: edwin@pratherlawoffices.com

Attorneys for Defendant

ROBERT OLINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT OLINS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: C 07-6423 MMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE DISMISSAL OF SEC’S MOTION AND 

VACATING EVIDENTIARY HEARING

This matter is currently set for an evidentiary hearing on January 30 and 31, 2017, on 

the Security Exchange Commission’s Motion For Order To Show Why Defendant Robert Olins 

Should Not Be Held In Contempt (the “Motion”).

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission dismisses its Motion and requests that 

the Court vacate the evidentiary hearing on January 30 and 31, 2017. The defendant agrees 

and jointly submits this stipulation and order. 

 AND ORDER 

TO SHOW CAUSE

Case 3:07-cv-06423-MMC Document 249 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF SEC’S MOTION

AND VACATING EVIDENTIARY HEARING [Case No.: C 07-6423 MMC] 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: January 24, 2017 ______/s/______________________

JOHN SILBERMANN

Attorney for Plaintiff

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION

Dated: January 24, 2017 _____/s/____________________

EDWIN PRATHER

PRATHER LAW OFFICES

Attorneys for Defendant

ROBERT OLINS

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING and per the parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

that the Security Exchange Commission’s Motion For Order To Show Why Defendant Robert 

Olins Should Not Be Held In Contempt is dismissed and the evidentiary hearing in this matter 

is hereby vacated. 

Dated: _______________ _____________________________________

THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY

UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

January 24, 2017 Court's Order to Show Cause, filed September 26, 2014, and 

^

thereon are ^

Case 3:07-cv-06423-MMC Document 249 Filed 01/24/17 Page 2 of 2