Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01696/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01696-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BRIAN BUCHANAN, ET AL., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD, 

Defendant.

CASE NO. 15-cv-01696-YGR 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER 

SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 524 

Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (Dkt. No. 524), 

the Court finds that good cause does not exist to seal the materials at issue. 

 The Court hereby DENIES the motion as follows: 

Document or Portion of 

Document Sought to be 

Sealed 

Evidence Offered in Support 

of Sealing 

Order 

Exhibit A to Plaintiffs’ 

Motion in Limine No. 7 

None - Designated 

Confidential by Defendant 

Tata Consultancy Services, 

Ltd., which has not filed a 

supporting declaration as 

required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

DENIED.

Exhibit B to Plaintiffs’ 

Motion in Limine No. 7 

None - Designated 

Confidential by Defendant 

Tata Consultancy Services, 

Ltd., which has not filed a 

supporting declaration as 

required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

DENIED.

Exhibit C to Plaintiffs’ 

Motion in Limine No. 7 

None - Designated 

Confidential by Defendant 

Tata Consultancy Services, 

Ltd., which has not filed a 

supporting declaration as 

required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

DENIED.

Case 4:15-cv-01696-YGR Document 588 Filed 10/15/18 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

Exhibit A to Plaintiffs’ 

Motion in Limine No. 8 

None - Designated 

Confidential by Defendant 

Tata Consultancy Services, 

Ltd., which has not filed a 

supporting declaration as 

required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

DENIED.

Exhibit D to Plaintiffs’ 

Motion in Limine No. 8 

None - Designated 

Confidential by Defendant 

Tata Consultancy Services, 

Ltd., which has not filed a 

supporting declaration as 

required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

DENIED.

Exhibit E to Plaintiffs’ 

Motion in Limine No. 8 

None - Designated 

Confidential by Defendant 

Tata Consultancy Services, 

Ltd., which has not filed a 

supporting declaration as 

required by L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

DENIED.

 

This Order terminates Docket Number 524. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

October 15, 2018

Case 4:15-cv-01696-YGR Document 588 Filed 10/15/18 Page 2 of 2