Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06281/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06281-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The court notes that Petitioner’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned by the United 1

States Postal Service with the notation that it was undeliverable and that Petitioner was out of custody. Pursuant to

Local Rule 83-182, service at a party’s address of record is fully effective.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

MARCO RENE ALMEIDA SOTO, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

CHARLES R. GILKEY, WARDEN )

)

Respondent. )

 )

CV F 04-6281 AWI WMW HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE DENIAL OF

PETITION

[Doc. 9]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On July 17, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. 

These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the

parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty

days. Petitioner did not file objections. 

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454

(9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and th

Case 1:04-cv-06281-AWI-WMW Document 11 Filed 01/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 

July 17, 2006, are a adopted in full;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close this

case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 30, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06281-AWI-WMW Document 11 Filed 01/03/07 Page 2 of 2