Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-02037/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-02037-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 CASE NO.

Plaintiff(s), 

 

v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process:

Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________ ____________________________

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________ ____________________________

Attorney for Defendant

The Trustees of the University of

Pennsylvania

Genentech, Inc.

✔ Private mediation at JAMS.

✔ November 18, 2010

4:10-cv-2037-PJH

July 29, 2010

July 29, 2010

/s/ M. Patricia Thayer

/s/ Jason G. Sheasby

Case 5:10-cv-02037-LHK Document 13 Filed 07/30/10 Page 1 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

Non-binding Arbitration 

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)

Mediation

Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session

90 days from the date of this order.

other ___________________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:________________ ___________________________________

UNITED STATES JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket 

Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."

✔

✔ November 18, 2010

DISTRICT

7/30/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 5:10-cv-02037-LHK Document 13 Filed 07/30/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION RE: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

4:10-CV-2037-PJH 

M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818)

pthayer@sidley.com 

AARON R. BLEHARSKI (SBN 240703) 

ableharski@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

SANDRA S. FUJIYAMA (SBN 198125) 

sfujiyama@sidley.com 

SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291) 

stiu@sidley.com 

TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 256449) 

ttwilliams@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 

Los Angeles, California 90013 

Telephone: (213) 896-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

GENENTECH, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION

GENENTECH, INC., 

Plaintiff and Counterclaim 

Defendant, 

v. 

THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 

PENNSYLVANIA, 

Defendant and Counterclaimant 

 Case No: 4:10-CV-2037-PJH 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION RE: 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

 

 

Case 5:10-cv-02037-LHK Document 13 Filed 07/30/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION RE: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

4:10-CV-2037-PJH L 

1 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

 Pursuant to General Order 45(X), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the attached 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process has been obtained from Jason G. Sheasby. 

Dated: July 29, 2010 Respectfully Submitted, 

By: /s/ M. Patricia Thayer 

M. Patricia Thayer (SBN 90818) 

Aaron R. Bleharski (SBN 240703) 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Sandra S. Fujiyama (SBN 198125) 

Samuel N. Tiu (SBN 216291) 

Tashica T. Williams (SBN 256449) 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 

Los Angeles, California 90013 

Telephone: (213) 896-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Genentech, Inc. 

Case 5:10-cv-02037-LHK Document 13 Filed 07/30/10 Page 4 of 4