Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05437/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05437-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL L. HUGHES,

Plaintiff,

v.

S. SHERMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:04-cv-05437-OWW-SMS PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR A SIXTY-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE AN OBJECTION

(Doc. 47)

ORDER VACATING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FROM COURT’S CALENDAR UNTIL

PLAINTIFF FILES HIS OBJECTION

(Doc. 34)

Plaintiff Michael L. Hughes (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on

plaintiff’s complaint, filed March 17, 2004, against defendants C. Villarrial, W. Villarreal, and

Streeter (“defendants”) for violating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (Docs.

1, 9.) On January 17, 2007, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment and on July 10, 2007,

the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations recommending the motion be granted.

The parties were provided thirty days within which to file objections. On August 15, 2007, plaintiff

filed a motion seeking a sixty-day extension of time to file an objection. 

Good cause having been shown, plaintiff’s motion shall be granted. In light of 28 U.S.C. §

476(a)(1), the Civil Justice Reform Act, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is deemed 

///

Case 1:04-cv-05437-OWW -SMS Document 48 Filed 08/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

vacated from the Court’s calendar until such time as plaintiff files his objection, allowing the Court

to consider the Findings and Recommendations.

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for a sixty-day extension of time to file an objection to the

Findings and Recommendations is GRANTED; and

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is deemed VACATED from the Court’s

calendar until such time as plaintiff files his objection.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 21, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05437-OWW -SMS Document 48 Filed 08/23/07 Page 2 of 2