Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00519/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00519-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN ESPRITT, 

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

A. SAESEE, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:11-cv-00519-AWI-GSA-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 23.)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE 

RELIEF

(Doc. 21.)

Brian Espritt (APlaintiff@) a civil detainee at Atascadero State Hospital in Atascadero, 

California, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On March 7, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 

Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. 23.) Plaintiff was provided 

an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. On 

March 18, 2013, Plaintiff filed what amounts to a notice of non-opposition to the findings and 

recommendations (Doc. 24.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 

Case 1:11-cv-00519-AWI-SAB Document 28 Filed 04/26/13 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 

analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 7, 

2013, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on March 1, 2013, is 

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2013 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

0m8i788

Case 1:11-cv-00519-AWI-SAB Document 28 Filed 04/26/13 Page 2 of 2