Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-90-01192/USCOURTS-ca10-90-01192-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

f ·- FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

DODD INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. and 

TOM DODD, JR., 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 

an Illinois corporation f/k/a RoyalGlobe Insurance Companies, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * 

AUG 2 4 1990 

.ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 90-1192 

(D.C. No. 87-B-440) 

(D. Colo.) 

Before McKAY, LOGAN and SEYMOUR, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App . P . 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The case is therefore ordered 

This is an appeal from an order of the district court which, 

in effect, directed counsel for plaintiffs in the underlying case 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 90-1192 Document: 010110041520 Date Filed: 08/24/1990 Page: 1 
-

to pay, as a sanction, attorney's fees of counsel for the opposing 

party. 

The matter is before the court on a motion for stay pending 

appeal. Alternatively, movants seek an order of this court 

directing the district court to permit payment of the sanction 

into the registry of the district court. Although the award of 

attorney's fees runs against counsel for plaintiffs, the notice of 

appeal indicates that only the plaintiffs appeal from that order. 

Counsel has not appealed. We conclude that this court lacks 

appellate jurisdiction. In re Woosley, 855 F.2d 687 (10th Cir. 

1988). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. All other requested 

relief is DENIED as moot. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

2 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

Appellate Case: 90-1192 Document: 010110041520 Date Filed: 08/24/1990 Page: 2