Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02097/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02097-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENCE KNIGHT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-00-2097 DFL GGH P

vs.

P. PRUDHOMME, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 1, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed April 18, 2006, denying plaintiff’s motion for the transcripts to be prepared at

the governments’ expense. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders

shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the

court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or

contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed April 18, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: 1/15/2007

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:00-cv-02097-DFL-GGH Document 97 Filed 01/15/07 Page 1 of 1