Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01191/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01191-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Harry Frank Scolinos, #62704 

Todd F. Nevell, #170054

SCOLINOS, SHELDON & NEVELL 

225 South Lake Avenue, 14th Floor 

Pasadena, California 91101 

Telephone: (626) 793-3900 

Facsimile: (626) 568-0930 

tnevell@ssn-law.net 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

ELIZABETH FREI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ELIZABETH FREI, ) CASE NO.: 05-1191 EDL 

 )

)

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

 ) ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING 

 ) DATE FOR DEFENDANT HARTFORD 

 ) LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY’S

vs. ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

 ) JUDGMENT ) 

HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE ) 

COMPANY and DOES 1 through 200, ) 

Inclusive, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective 

attorneys of record, that the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Hartford 

Life Insurance, and the last date for hearing on dispositive motions, be continued from January 24, 

2006 to February 14, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, 450 Golden State Avenue, San 

Francisco, California. Good cause for the continuance exists as (1) the parties are participating in 

a mediation on January 12, 2006 before Robert Luft, Esq at JAMS-San Jose, and the short 

continuance will allow the parties to prepare for and attend the mediation without the necessity of 

plaintiff preparing and filing a memorandum in opposition to the motion prior to the mediation; 

Case 3:05-cv-01191-EDL Document 36 Filed 12/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

and (2) the Court continued on its own motion the previously set hearing date of January 10, 2006 

to January 24, 2006, but neither parties’ counsel is available on January 24, 2006, and February 

14, 2006 is the next available date on the Court’s calendar. 

 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that in the event the case is not resolved at the mediation, 

plaintiff’s opposition to the Summary Judgment must be filed and served on or before January 24, 

2006 and Defendants’ reply, if any, must be filed and served on or before January 31, 2006.

 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: December 29, 2005 SCOLINOS, SHELDON & NEVELL 

 By _____/S/______________

 *Todd F. Nevell, Esq. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

 ELIZABETH FREI 

Dated: December 29, 2005. SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD, LLP 

 By _____/S/______________

 Dennis G. Rolstad, Esq. 

 Attorneys for Defendant, 

 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

* I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

"conformed" signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE: ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

December 30, 2005

Case 3:05-cv-01191-EDL Document 36 Filed 12/30/05 Page 2 of 2