Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00190/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00190-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 The court agreed to hear this motion on shortened time. 1

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HANGER PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS,

INC.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0190 WBS GGH

vs.

CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT SUMMARY ORDER

REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, INC.,

et al.,

Defendants. 

 /

Previously pending on this court’s law and motion calendar for December 6,

2007, was defendants’ motion to compel supplemental interrogatory responses, filed November

12, 2007, and plaintiff’ motion for protective order regarding the noticed Rule 30(b)(6)

deposition of Hanger Prosthetics and Orthotics, Inc.(“Hanger”), filed November 29, 2007.1

Having reviewed the joint statement and heard oral argument, the court now issues the following

summary order. 

1. Discovery cutoff is extended to January 15, 2008 for purposes of clean-up

discovery set forth in this order. All discovery/sanctions motions shall be filed so that they may

Case 2:07-cv-00190-WBS-GGH Document 42 Filed 12/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

be heard by this date.

2. Defendants’ motion to compel supplemental interrogatory responses, filed

November 12, 2007, is granted in part. Hanger shall produce supplemental responses to

interrogatories by Monday, December 10, 2007. Defendants may renew their motion after

receiving these responses if they are not satisfactory, and if believed necessary after the taking of

Rule 30(b)(6) depositions, so that a motion may be heard and decided by January 15, 2008.

3. Plaintiff’s motion for protective order, filed November 29, 2007, is denied. 

Hanger shall produce its Rule 30(b)(6) witness for deposition as scheduled, and these witnesses

shall be sufficiently prepared for deposition as discussed at hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 12/11/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

_____________________________

U.S. Magistrate Judge

GGH:076/hanger0190.rog

Case 2:07-cv-00190-WBS-GGH Document 42 Filed 12/11/07 Page 2 of 2