Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01070/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-01070-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The court notes that all discovery and disclosure matters are automatically referred to the 1

assigned Magistrate Judge by virtue of the Court’s San Jose Division’s Standing Order Regarding Case

Management in Civil Cases. 

For example, Paragraph 11 would automatically relieve a party of any waiver of privilege 2

that would otherwise result from an inadvertent disclosure. Such determinations must be made based

on the facts and circumstances surrounding specific inadvertent disclosures.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MAY MOUA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS

MACHINES CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 10-1070 JW (PVT)

ORDER RE PARTIES’ PROPOSED FORM 

OF PROTECTIVE ORDER

(Re: Docket No. 21)

On November 17, 2010, the parties submitted a proposed form of stipulated protective order.

1

Some of the provisions of the proposed form of order are not acceptable to the court. Rather than 2

spend time identifying all of the problems with the proposed form of order, the court finds it more

efficient to direct the parties to use the one of the court’s model forms of protective order. 

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than December 1, 2010, the parties shall submit a

revised form of protective order that uses the wording of the court’s model “Stipulated Protective 

Case 5:10-cv-01070-EJD Document 22 Filed 11/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 As used herein, “modification” does not include merely selecting one of two or more 3

optional provisions so long as the wording of the option selected accurately reflects the wording in the

court’s model form of order.

ORDER, page 2

Order for Litigation Involving Patents, Highly Sensitive Confidential Information And/or Trade

Secrets” available in the “Forms” section of the court’s website (www.cand.uscourts.gov). If the

parties believe that modification of the court’s model form of order is reasonably necessary for the 3

present action, they shall also submit a joint brief explaining what modification they seek, and why it

is reasonably necessary for the present action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending entry of the final form of protective order, the

handling of confidential information shall be governed by the provisions of the court’s model

“Stipulated Protective Order for Litigation Involving Patents, Highly Sensitive Confidential

Information And/or Trade Secrets.”

Dated: 11/22/10

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:10-cv-01070-EJD Document 22 Filed 11/22/10 Page 2 of 2