Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05018/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05018-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

KAVIN MAURICE RHODES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

M. ROBINSON, et al., )

) 

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1:02- CV F 5018 REC DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST TO FILE SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Judgment was entered in this action on

February 4, 2003 after the District Judge adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendation granting defendants’ motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity. Plaintiff

filed a notice of appeal on February 19, 2003. On April 25, 2005, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

issued an opinion reversing the judgment and remanding the action to the District Court for further

proceedings. On May 11, 2005, this Court ordered defendants to respond to the first amended

complaint. Defendants filed an answer to the first amended complaint on June 3, 2005. The Court

issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order on July 14, 2005. On March 30, 2006, plaintiff filed a

motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED to

respond to plaintiff’s motion within 20 days of this order.

Case 1:02-cv-05018-LJO-DLB Document 69 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 30, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05018-LJO-DLB Document 69 Filed 03/31/06 Page 2 of 2