Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-00632/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-00632-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation & (Proposed) Order to Allow Deposition Discovery to be Conducted Via Telephone.

 Davis v. KMART Holding Company, et al Case No. C04 0632 WDB 

HOWARD MOORE, JR., SBN 55228

Moore and Moore

445 Bellevue Avenue, Second Floor

Oakland, California 94610-4924

Telephone: (510) 451-0104

Facsimile: (510) 451-5056

Email: Moorlaw@aol.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Joycelyn Davis

Steven R. Blackburn, SBN 154797

Lori Bien, SBN 189283

Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

One California Street, 26 Floor th

San Francisco, California 94111-5427

Telephone: (415) 398-3500

Facsimile: (415) 398-0955 

Attorneys for Defendant, KMART HOLDING COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION

JOYCELYN DAVIS, ) Case No. C04-0632-WDB

 )

 Plaintiff, )

 ) STIPULATION &

vs. ) ORDER TO ALLOW DEPOSITION

 ) DISCOVERY TO BE CONDUCTED

KMART HOLDING COMPANY, a ) VIA TELEPHONE

CORPORATION dba KMART and ) 

KMART SUPERSTORES, and )

DOES ONE THROUGH TWENTY, )

Inclusive, )

 )

Defendants. )

_____________________________________)

Whereas, Rule 30(b)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in part, provides

that the parties to a civil action “may upon stipulation in writing or the court may upon

motion order that a deposition be taken by telephone or other remote electronic means;” and

Whereas, Plaintiff has previously noticed the deposition of Susan Duncan who works

and resides in southern Florida to be taken by telephone on August 2, 2005, beginning at

Case 4:04-cv-00632-WDB Document 57 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 1 of 2
 Case 4:04-cv-00632-WDB Document 59 Filed 08/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation & (Proposed) Order to Allow Deposition Discovery to be Conducted Via Telephone.

 Davis v. KMART Holding Company, et al Case No. C04 0632 WDB 

2

10:00 a.m., PDT, and Defendant has agreed to allow Plaintiff to take Ms. Duncan’s

deposition via telephone,

Therefore, the parties herein, through and by their undersigned counsel of record, 

stipulate and agree to take depositions via telephone on such terms and conditions as they

may agree upon from time-to-time, including the deposition of Susan Duncan, and hereby

further agree and stipulate to entry of an order allowing the parties to conduct deposition

discovery in this civil action via telephone.

Moore and Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: July 28, 2005

By:_____________________

 HOWARD MOORE, JR.

Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant

Dated: July , 2005

By: ______________________

 LORI BIEN

ORDER

Pursuant to Stipulation: IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 29, 2005

__________________________

WAYNE D. BRAZIL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:04-cv-00632-WDB Document 57 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 2 of 2
 Case 4:04-cv-00632-WDB Document 59 Filed 08/01/05 Page 2 of 2