Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00019/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00019-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

{00253108v1} -1- 

JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN REQ TO EXCEED 

PAGE LIMITATIONS RE: OPP TO APPLE’S SECOND FOR MSJ OF INVALIDITY (Case No. C06-00019 MHP)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PARKER C. FOLSE III (WA Bar No. 24895 – Pro Hac Vice) 

pfolse@susmangodfrey.com 

IAN B. CROSBY (WA Bar No. 28461 – Pro Hac Vice) 

icrosby@susmangodfrey.com 

FLOYD G. SHORT (WA Bar No. 21632 – Pro Hac Vice) 

fshort@susmangodfrey.com 

SUSMAN GODFREY, L.L.P. 

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 

Seattle, Washington 98101-3000 

(206) 516-3880 Tel. 

(206) 516-3883 Fax 

SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777) 

shosie@hosielaw.com 

BRUCE WECKER (CA Bar No. 078530) 

bwecker@hosielaw.com 

HOSIE McARTHUR LLP 

One Market, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

(415) 247-6000 Tel. 

(415) 247-6001 Fax 

(additional attorneys listed on signature page) 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

BURST.COM, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

APPLE COMPUTER, INC., 

 

 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 

 

 v. 

 

BURST.COM, INC., 

 

 Defendant/Counterclaimant. 

CASE NO. C06-00019 MHP 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE 

REQUEST TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS 

GOVERNING BURST’S OPPOSITION TO 

APPLE’S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY AND EXTEND 

DEADLINE FOR APPLE’S REPLY 

DATE: September 18, 2007 

TIME: 2:00 p.m. 

CRTRM: 15, 18th Floor 

JUDGE: Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel

 

Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP Document 143 Filed 08/28/07 Page 1 of 4
{00253108v1} -2- 

JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN REQ TO EXCEED 

PAGE LIMITATIONS RE: OPP TO APPLE’S SECOND FOR MSJ OF INVALIDITY (Case No. C06-00019 MHP)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The Court, having considered the Stipulation for Administrative Relief permitting Burst to 

file a Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment in excess of 

applicable page limitations and extend Apple’s Reply deadline, orders the following: 

 In accordance with Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 7-4 and 7-12, the 

undersigned hereby stipulate to increase the page limit of Burst.com, Inc.’s Brief in Opposition to 

Apple Computer, Inc.’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity from 25 pages of text 

to 40 pages. 

 In accordance with Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6-2 and 7-12, Apple and 

Burst further hereby stipulate to extend the deadline of Apple’s Brief in Reply to Burst’s Opposition 

to Apple’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity (“the reply brief”) from September 

4, 2007 to September 6, 2007. The reason for this short extension is that currently the reply brief

will be due immediately after the Labor Day holiday. Previous extensions in this case have been for 

Burst’s response to Apple’s complaint and Apple’s response to Burst’s counterclaims, for the date 

of the case management conference, and for the date of the summary judgment hearing. The Court 

also modified the scheduling order at the request of the parties. Extending the deadline for the reply 

brief will not have any effect on the remaining deadlines in this case. 

Dated: August 24, 2007 By: /s/_______ 

 PARKER C. FOLSE III (WA Bar No. 24895- 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

pfolse@susmangodfrey.com 

SUSMAN GODFREY, L.L.P. 

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 

Seattle, Washington 98101-3000 

(206) 516-3880 Tel. 

SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777) 

shosie@hosielaw.com 

BRUCE WECKER (CA Bar No. 078530) 

bwecker@hosielaw.com 

HOSIE McARTHUR LLP 

One Market, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

(415) 247-6000 Tel. 

Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP Document 143 Filed 08/28/07 Page 2 of 4
{00253108v1} -3- 

JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN REQ TO EXCEED 

PAGE LIMITATIONS RE: OPP TO APPLE’S SECOND FOR MSJ OF INVALIDITY (Case No. C06-00019 MHP)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL F. HEIM (TX Bar No. 9380923- 

 Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

mheim@hpcllp.com 

LESLIE V. PAYNE (TX Bar No. 0784736- 

 Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

lpayne@hpcllp.com 

HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH, L.L.P. 

600 Travis Street, Suite 6710 

Houston, TX 77002 

(713) 221-2000 Tel. 

ROBERT J. YORIO (CA Bar No. 93178) 

ryorio@carrferrell.com 

V. RANDALL GARD (CA Bar No. 151677) 

rgard@carrferrell.com 

COLBY B. SPRINGER (CA Bar No. 214868) 

cspringer@carrferrell.com 

CHRISTOPHER P. GREWE (CA Bar No. 245938) 

cgrewe@carrferrell.com 

CARR & FERRELL LLP 

2200 Geng Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

(650) 812-3400 Tel. 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BURST.COM, INC.

Dated: August 24, 2007 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Nicholas A. Brown 

Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE COMPUTER, INC. 

Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP Document 143 Filed 08/28/07 Page 3 of 4
{00253108v1} -4- 

JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN REQ TO EXCEED 

PAGE LIMITATIONS RE: OPP TO APPLE’S SECOND FOR MSJ OF INVALIDITY (Case No. C06-00019 MHP)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

O R D E R 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August __, 2007 

Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

United States District Court Judge 

insofar as extension of time is agreed to; Insofar as the page increase, it is DENIED. The parties shall stay within prescribed page limits. 28

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP Document 143 Filed 08/28/07 Page 4 of 4