Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04485/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04485-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR RTRN INVESTMENT, LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARSHALL LOSKOT

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARSHALL LOSKOT and DISABILITY

RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT 

EDUCATION SERVICES,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAN FRANCISCO CENTRAL

TRAVELODGE; DAVID R. SCHILLER

and THELMA J. SCHILLER, as trustees of

the DAVID R. SCHILLER and THELMA

J. SCHILLER LIVING TRUST; GEORGE

S. RITZAU, as trustee of the RITZAU

1990 FAMILY TRUST; CAROLE M.

PHILLIPS, an individual; JOAN L. VAN

DE SANDE, as trustee of the JOAN L.

VAN DE SANDE TRUST; KURT S. VAN

DE SANDE, an individual; BRET W.

VAN DE SANDE, an individual;

MARGENE A. LORTON, an individual;

DANIEL MCMILLAN, an individual;

PAUL V. LORTON, an individual; WW

LODGING LIMITED, LLC., a Delaware

limited liability company; KENNETH G.

ROSE, as trustee of the KENNETH G.

ROSE TRUST; MARS PROPERTIES,

INC., a California corporation; FOUR

ROSES, INC., a California corporation;

BOREL BANK & TRUST COMPANY, as

Successor trustee of the FRANCES G.

ROSE TRUST; and RTRN

INVESTMENT, LLC, a limited liability

company,

Defendants. ___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-4485 VRW

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS RTRN INVESTMENT, LLC

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case 3:04-cv-04485-VRW Document 42 Filed 10/07/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR RTRN INVESTMENT, LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

2

Plaintiffs MARSHALL LOSKOT and DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES:HELPING YOU HELP OTHERS, and defendant RTRN

INVESTMENT, LLC, through their undersigned counsel stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant RTRN INVESTMENT, LLC is granted an extension of time to and 

including October 26, 2005 to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ complaint.

2. In the event defendant RTRN INVESTMENT, LLC files a motion in lieu of an

answer to plaintiffs’ complaint, the hearing on such motion shall be set on a date no sooner

than 45 days from the filing of said motion.

3. Defendant’s counsel further stipulates that defendant will comply with any and

all due dates dictated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Court, and/or

any scheduling order issued by the court prior to the date on which defendant’s responsive

pleading is due hereunder.

This Stipulation may be executed in faxed counterparts, all of which together shall

constitute one original document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: September 27, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Jennifer L. Steneberg 

Jennifer L. Steneberg 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARSHALL LOSKOT

and DISABILITY RIGHTSENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES:HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

DATED: September 27, 2005 WATTERS & ASSOCIATES

By: /s/ Vernon C. Watters 

Vernon C. Watters

Attorneys for Defendant RTRN INVESTMENT,

LLC

Case 3:04-cv-04485-VRW Document 42 Filed 10/07/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR RTRN INVESTMENT, LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

3

ORDER

Defendant RTRN INVESTMENT, LLC is hereby granted an extension of time to and

including October 26, 2005 to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:___________, 2005 

Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker

United States District Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:04-cv-04485-VRW Document 42 Filed 10/07/05 Page 3 of 3