Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01023/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01023-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCIAL PLATA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-01023-LJO-GSA-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND

FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

(Doc. 26.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS 

Plaintiff Marcial Plata (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on August 7, 2006. (Doc. 1.) 

Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint on December 10, 2008. (Doc. 19.) Plaintiff filed the

Second Amended Complaint on April 24, 2009. (Docs. 25, 26.)

On June 4, 2010, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and issued an order requiring Plaintiff to

either filed a Third Amended Complaint or notify the court that he wishes to proceed with the First

Amended Complaint on the claims found cognizable by the Court, within thirty days . 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). (Doc.32.) To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise

responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims 1

upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. 

On June 18, 2010, the United States Postal Service returned the court’s order as undeliverable.Chrono on

1

File.” Plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior

address is fully effective. Local Rule 182(f).

1

Case 1:06-cv-01023-GSA Document 33 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the undersigned

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that:

1. This action be dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state any

claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983 and Plaintiff' s failure

to obey a court order; and

2. The Clerk be DIRECTED to close this case.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30)

days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written

objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d

1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 22, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:06-cv-01023-GSA Document 33 Filed 07/23/10 Page 2 of 2