Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00896/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00896-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES BILBREY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0896 FCD EFB P

vs.

ARAMARK, et al., 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants

 /

On April 21, 2010, the court found that plaintiff had attempted to initiate a civil action

without paying the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or requesting leave to proceed in

forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The court ordered plaintiff gave plaintiff 30 days to

submit the required filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis and warned him that

failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not paid the required filing fee or

requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to that order.

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

Case 2:10-cv-00896-FCD-EFB Document 7 Filed 07/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: July 14, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-00896-FCD-EFB Document 7 Filed 07/15/10 Page 2 of 2