Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02009/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02009-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INITIAL DISCLOSURE DATES 

CASE NO. C-05-02009-MMC 

356225.01

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065 

JAN NIELSEN LITTLE - #100029 

MICHAEL D. CELIO - #197998 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

Attorneys for Defendants 

M. RICHARD ASHER, BRUCE McMILLAN, 

LEONARD S. COLEMAN, TIMOTHY MOTT, 

WILLIAM J. BYRON, ROBERT W. PITTMAN, 

JOEL LINZNER, WARREN C. JENSON, 

GERHARD FLORIN, LAWRENCE F. PROBST, III, 

DON A. MATTRICK, NANCY L. SMITH, 

STEPHEN BENÉ, J. RUSSELL RUEFF, JR. and 

ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WALTER HAMMOCK, derivatively on 

behalf of Nominal Defendant ELECTRONIC 

ARTS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

M. RICHARD ASHER, BRUCE 

McMILLAN, LEONARD S. COLEMAN, 

TIMOTHY MOTT, WILLIAM J. BYRON, 

ROBERT W. PITTMAN, JOEL LINZNER, 

WARREN C. JENSON, GERHARD 

FLORIN, LAWRENCE F. PROBST, III, 

DON A. MATTRICK, NANCY L. SMITH, 

STEPHEN BENÉ and J. RUSSELL RUEFF, 

JR.

Defendants,

and

ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., 

Nominal Defendant, 

 Case No. C-05-02009-MMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE INITIAL DISCLOSURE 

DATES 

Date: September 16, 2005 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Dept: 7, 19th Floor 

Judge: Maxine M. Chesney 

Date Comp. Filed: May 16, 2005 

Case 3:05-cv-02009-MMC Document 22 Filed 08/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INITIAL DISCLOSURE DATES 

CASE NO. C-05-02009-MMC 

356225.01

WHEREAS, Rule 26 disclosures are due in this action on September 12, 2005 by order 

of this Court; and 

WHEREAS, plaintiffs in the instant action filed an unopposed motion to consolidate this 

case with Sindona v. Asher, et al., Case No. C-05-02644 on July 29, 2005; and 

WHEREAS, that motion is currently pending before this Court; and 

WHEREAS, that motion also seeks the appointment of a lead counsel; and 

WHEREAS, should the Court appoint lead counsel, lead counsel would need to meet 

with other plaintiffs counsel to determine if an amended complaint need be filed, 

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED THAT 

1. The current deadline for Rule 26 Disclosures is vacated, and the parties’ Rule 26 

Disclosures shall not be due until sixty (60) days from the Court’s resolution of plaintiff’s 

motion to consolidate. 

Dated: August 8, 2005. KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ Michael D. Celio ______________

MICHAEL D. CELIO 

Attorneys for Defendants 

M. RICHARD ASHER, et al. 

Dated: August 8, 2005. MARY ALEXANDER ASSOCIATES 

By: /s/ Mary E. Alexander (by express permission)

MARY E. ALEXANDER 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

WALTER HAMMOCK 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August ___, 2005 

By: __________________________________ 

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

12

Case 3:05-cv-02009-MMC Document 22 Filed 08/12/05 Page 2 of 2