Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00964/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00964-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Stephen Bishop,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al., 

Defendants, 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-964-PHX-SMM (JRI) 

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND

ORDER

 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay, filed April 14, 2009 (Doc. #53).

Plaintiff seeks a stay of this action pending an appeal to the Ninth Circuit and a complaint

to the State Bar. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Jay Irwin for Report and

Recommendation, and on May 19, 2009 the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and

Recommendation with this Court (Doc. #57). To date, no objections have been filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see Baxter v. Sullivan,

923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). Parties have ten days from the service of a copy of the

Magistrate's recommendation within which to file specific written objections to the Court.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. Failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s

recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s

factual findings and waives all objections to those findings on appeal. See Turner v. Duncan,

158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). A failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s conclusion “is

Case 2:08-cv-00964-SMM Document 58 Filed 06/18/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal.”

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998).

DISCUSSION

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no

Objections having been made by any party thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and adopts

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth,

 IT IS ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge (Doc. #57).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay (Doc. #53).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is stayed pending a decision on

Plaintiff’s Notice of Interlocutory Appeal filed April 3, 2009 (#47).

DATED this 18th day of June, 2009.

Case 2:08-cv-00964-SMM Document 58 Filed 06/18/09 Page 2 of 2