Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08068/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08068-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

BNSF Railway Co.,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Coconino Land and Cattle LLC 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 07-8068-PCT-PGR

ORDER

Before the Court is Coconino’s Motion for Leave to File Surreplies to BNSF’s

Objections and Evidentiary Arguments. (Doc. 237.) 

In a prior order the Court denied Coconino’s motions to strike BNSF’s objections and

its motions for leave to file separate replies, and ruled that if Coconino wished to file a

surreply, it “must file a motion for leave demonstrating a proper basis for such a filing.”

(Doc. 236.) Coconino cites several paragraphs in BNSF’s objections which it characterizes

as containing legal analysis of evidentiary issues and new factual allegations to which it has

not had an opportunity to respond. (Doc. 237 at 3.) Having reviewed those paragraphs the

Court concludes that Coconino has not shown a “proper basis” for filing surreplies. As the

Court previously noted, the information set forth in BNSF’s objections consists primarily of

evidentiary objections and rebuttal arguments. Neither these legal arguments nor the

supporting factual information necessitates an additional filing by Coconino. 

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:07-cv-08068-PGR Document 248 Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Coconino’s Motion for Leave to File Surreplies

(Doc. 237) is denied.

DATED this 16th day of February, 2011.

Case 3:07-cv-08068-PGR Document 248 Filed 02/16/11 Page 2 of 2