Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01792/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01792-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE EXCESS PAGES OR, 

ALTERNATIVELY, TO FILE SEPARATE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS, FOR GOOD 

CAUSE; [PROPOSED] ORDER [NO. 15-01792 HSG]

JAMES R. ROSEN (SBN: 119438)

JROSEN@ROSENSABA.COM

ELIZABETH L. BRADLEY (SBN: 172272)

EBRADLEY@ROSENSABA.COM

ROSEN ✧ SABA, LLP 

9350 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 250

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Telephone: (310) 285-1727

Facsimile: (310) 285-1728

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MARLENE PEREZ AND ROSA CERISANO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARLENE PEREZ, an individual, and 

ROSA CERISANO, an individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JOHN MUIR HEALTH, a California 

corporation, JOHN MUIR MEDICAL 

CENTER, an unknown business entity, 

and DOES 1-20, et al

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 15-01792 HSG

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO 

FILE EXCESS PAGES OR, 

ALTERNATIVELY, TO FILE 

SEPARATE EVIDENTIARY 

OBJECTIONS; ORDER

Hon. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Complaint Filed: April 21, 2015

Case 4:15-cv-01792-HSG Document 85 Filed 05/24/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE EXCESS PAGES OR, 

ALTERNATIVELY, TO FILE SEPARATE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS, FOR GOOD 

CAUSE; [PROPOSED] ORDER [NO. 15-01792 HSG]

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR 

ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, Plaintiffs 

Marlene Perez and Rose Cerisano (“Plaintiffs”), hereby move this Court for an 

order granting leave for Plaintiffs to file a Memorandum in support of their 

Opposition to Defendant John Muir Health’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary 

Judgment, or, alternatively, for leave to file a separate pleading, to not exceed five 

pages, containing Plaintiffs’ objections to the evidence offered by Defendant in 

support of its Motion for Summary Judgment.

Good cause exists for the relief sought. Northern District Local Rule 7-4(b) 

limits briefs to 25 pages. However, Local Rule 7-11 permits a party to move for 

administrative relief to exceed the page limit. Defendant’s Memorandum in 

support of its Motion for Summary Judgment includes seven separate declarations. 

(Docs. #70-1 through 70-11.) (Declaration of Elizabeth L. Bradley [“Bradley 

Decl.”], ¶ 2.] Including exhibits, these declarations span 557 pages. (Id.) 

Plaintiffs have made an earnest effort to conform to the page limit specified in 

Local Rule 7-4(b). (Bradley Decl., ¶ 3.) However, Plaintiffs’ necessary 

evidentiary objections cause the Opposition to exceed 25 pages. (Id.) 

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 4:15-cv-01792-HSG Document 85 Filed 05/24/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE EXCESS PAGES OR, 

ALTERNATIVELY, TO FILE SEPARATE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS, FOR GOOD 

CAUSE; [PROPOSED] ORDER [NO. 15-01792 HSG]

Plaintiffs’ counsel has attempted to informally resolve this issue with 

Defendant’s counsel by securing a stipulation to the relief requested herein. 

(Bradley Decl., ¶ 4, Ex. 1.) However, Defendant’s counsel declined to stipulate to 

the requested relief. (Id.) Accordingly, Plaintiffs request this Court grant them 

leave to file a Memorandum in support of their Opposition with an additional five 

pages, or, alternatively, to file a separate pleading, not to exceed five pages, 

containing Plaintiffs’ evidentiary objections.

Dated: May 23, 2016 Respectfully Submitted,

ROSEN SABA LLP

By: /s/ Elizabeth L. Bradley JAMES R. ROSEN

ELIZABETH L. BRADLEY

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MARLENE PEREZ AND ROSA 

CERISANO 

ORDER

Having reviewed the materials submitted by the parties, the Court finds that 

good cause exists for the relief sought by Plaintiffs. 

Plaintiffs’ may file a Memorandum in support of their Opposition to 

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment with an additional five pages, or, in 

the alternative, Plaintiffs may file a separate pleading, to not exceed five pages,

exclusively containing Plaintiffs’ objections to Defendant’s evidence offered in 

support of its Motion for Summary Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 5/24/2016 _________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. 

Case 4:15-cv-01792-HSG Document 85 Filed 05/24/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE EXCESS PAGES OR, 

ALTERNATIVELY, TO FILE SEPARATE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS, FOR GOOD 

CAUSE; [PROPOSED] ORDER [NO. 15-01792 HSG]

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

)ss

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over 

the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is: 9350 

Wilshire Blvd., Suite 250, Beverly Hills, CA 90212.

On May 23, 2016, I served the foregoing document described as: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE 

EXCESS PAGES OR, ALTERNATIVELY, TO FILE SEPARATE 

EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS, FOR GOOD CAUSE; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER, on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as follows:

Michael D. Bruno, Esq. 

Hieu Tran, Esq. 

GORDON & REES LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 986-5900

Facsimile: (415) 986-8054

Email: MBRUNO@GORDONREES.COM, HTRAN@GORDONREES.COM

[√] By electronic transmission to all parties at the recipients at the electronic 

address above by using the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system.

[√] FEDERAL I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United 

States of America that the above is true and correct.

Executed on May 23, 2016, at Beverly Hills, California.

 ____/s/ Elizabeth L. Bradley, Esq._______________ 

 Elizabeth L. Bradley

Case 4:15-cv-01792-HSG Document 85 Filed 05/24/16 Page 4 of 4