Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_19-cv-00107/USCOURTS-ared-4_19-cv-00107-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

CENTRAL DIVISION 

JAGER PRO, INC. PLAINTIFF 

v. No. 4:19-cv-107-DPM 

BULL CREEK WELDING AND 

FABRICATION, INC. DEFENDANT 

ORDER 

The parties have asked the Court to modify its definition of the 

person having ordinary skill in the art involved in this case. Doc. 50. 

This is a fact question. Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City, 

383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966). The record is thin, but the parties agree on what 

the definition should be. The motion is therefore granted as modified. 

Here's the new definition: 

A person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the 

invention would have at least a bachelor's degree in 

mechanical, industrial, or civil engineering. She would also 

have some experience dealing with wireless 

communications systems and monitoring devices - such as 

digital, infrared, low-light, and motion-sensing cameras. 

So Ordered. 

D .P. Marshall Jr. 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:19-cv-00107-DPM-BD Document 54 Filed 07/16/20 Page 1 of 1