Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00829/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00829-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DYLAN CORRAL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FOLSOM STATE PRISON, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-0829 AC P (TEMP) 

ORDER & 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By an order filed June 17, 2015, plaintiff was granted a thirty day extension of time in 

which to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees. (ECF No. 10.) 

By an order filed July 27, 2015, plaintiff was granted a ninety day extension of time in which to 

file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees. (ECF No. 11.) By an order 

filed November 12, 2015, plaintiff was granted a thirty day extension of time in which to file an 

in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees. (ECF No. 14.) In the latter order, 

plaintiff was cautioned as follows: “Plaintiff’s failure to fully and properly comply with this order 

will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. No further extensions of time will be 

granted.” (Id. at 2.) 

 The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an in forma pauperis 

affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee, and has not otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

//// 

Case 2:15-cv-00829-GEB-AC Document 15 Filed 12/24/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a 

district judge in this action. 

 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: December 23, 2015 

Case 2:15-cv-00829-GEB-AC Document 15 Filed 12/24/15 Page 2 of 2