Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01954/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01954-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

– 1 – 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF C 04-01954JW

JOINT PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE L-3970-04 \ 351655

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO (CA Bar No. 084965) 

JONATHAN T. PECK (VA Bar No. 12303) 

MARCIA L. MITCHELL (WA Bar No. 18122) 

SANYA P. HILL (WA Bar No. 18739) 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 

350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1260 

Tel. No. (415) 625-5651 

Fax No. (415) 625-5657 

Attorneys for Plaintiff EEOC 

RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (#88625) 

NORA FRIMANN, Chief Trial Attorney (#93249) 

ROBERT FABELA, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (#148098) 

NKIA D. RICHARDSON, Deputy City Attorney (#193209) 

Office of the City Attorney 

200 East Santa Clara Street 

San Jose, California 95113 

Telephone Number: (408) 535-1900 

Facsimile Number: (408) 998-3131 

Attorneys for CITY OF SAN JOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITY OF SAN JOSE, 

 Defendant. 

Case Number: C 04-01954 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: JOINT PRE-TRIAL 

STATEMENT AND MOTIONS IN 

LIMINE

WHEREAS, on January 30, 2006 this Court issued an order which included a 

deadline of April 21, 2006 for (1) the submission of a Joint Pre-Trial Statement; (2) 

objections to receipt into evidence of a witness, exhibits or discovery response (collectively 

“objections”); and (3) motions in limine; 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:04-cv-01954-JW Document 40 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 4
– 2 – 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF C 04-01954JW

JOINT PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE L-3970-04 \ 351655

WHEREAS, the parties have begun discussing the contents of the Joint Pre-Trial 

Statement, but require more time to finalize the Joint Pre-Trial statement and objections 

and complete their motions in limine; 

WHEREAS, the parties in good faith believe that additional time to submit the Joint 

Pre-Trial Statement, objections and motions in limine will result in more concise 

submissions and the possible narrowing of issues in this case; 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The date by which the parties must submit their Joint Pre-Trial Statement, 

objections and motions in limine shall be continued to April 28, 2006; 

2. All other dates contained in the January 30, 2006 Order shall remain 

unchanged. 

Dated: April 17, 2006 

EQUAL EMPLOYEMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION 

By: /s/ Marcia Mitchell____________________ MARCIA MITCHELL 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 

Dated: April 17, 2006 

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 

By: /s/ Nkia D. Richardson _________________ NKIA D. RICHARDSON 

 Deputy City Attorney 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 City of San Jose 

Case 5:04-cv-01954-JW Document 40 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 4
– 3 – 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF C 04-01954JW

JOINT PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE L-3970-04 \ 351655

 I attest that Plaintiff’s counsel has approved this document telephonically and given 

consent to the filing of the same with the court. 

Dated: April 17, 2006 

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 

By: /s/ Nkia D. Richardson _______________ NKIA D. RICHARDSON 

 Deputy City Attorney 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 City of San Jose 

Case 5:04-cv-01954-JW Document 40 Filed 04/25/06 Page 3 of 4
– 4 – 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF C 04-01954JW

JOINT PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE L-3970-04 \ 351655

ORDER

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties now orders as follows: 

1. The date by which the parties must submit their (1) Joint Pre-Trial Statement; 

(2) objections to receipt into evidence of a witness, exhibits or discovery response; and 

(3) motions in limine shall be continued to April 28, 2006; 

2. All other dates contained in the January 30, 2006 Order shall remain 

unchanged. 

Dated: April __, 2006 __________________________________ 

HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD 

United State District Court Magistrate Judge 

25

JAMES WARE

Case 5:04-cv-01954-JW Document 40 Filed 04/25/06 Page 4 of 4