Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01929/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01929-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, et al,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-1929 CKD P

ORDER

On August 5, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. Defendants’ object to 

the motion based upon the fact that plaintiff has not provided the court with a “statement of 

undisputed facts” as required by Local Rule 260. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 30) is denied without 

prejudice to plaintiff filing a motion for summary judgment which complies with Local Rule 260 

on or before October 24, 2014; the deadline for filing pretrial motions.

Dated: September 24, 2014

1

will1929.msj

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:13-cv-01929-KJM-CKD Document 37 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 1