Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00233/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00233-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAS ADISA GAMBA OLUWA, No. CIV-S-04-0233 MCE/GGH P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA 

DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On July 7, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-00233-MCE -GGH Document 30 Filed 09/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 7, 2005, are

adopted in full; 

2. Defendants’ September 13, 2004 motion to dismiss is

granted as to defendant Alameida and he is dismissed from this

action and the motion is denied as to all other grounds;

3. This action proceeds only against defendant Woodford, in

her official capacity, for prospective injunctive relief only;

and 

4. Plaintiff’s October 12, 2004 (apparently re-served on

November 19, 2004), motion for summary judgment is denied

without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to file the motion in

compliance with Local Rule 56-260(a).

DATED: September 7, 2005

_________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00233-MCE -GGH Document 30 Filed 09/07/05 Page 2 of 2