Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02030/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02030-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The Court notes that Plaintiffs filed a Notice requesting that the Court remand this case to the state court based on

the amount in controversy. That Notice, however, did not relieve Plaintiffs of their duty to comply with Local Rule 7-3.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GKA ENTERPRISES INC. et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

 CONAGRA FOODS INC,

Defendant. /

No. C05-02030 MJJ

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Pending before the Court is Defendant Conagra Foods, Inc.’s Motion for Judgment on the

Pleadings (Doc. #37), filed on February 9, 2006, and set for hearing on March 21, 2006. Pursuant to

Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) and (b), Plaintiffs GKA Enterprises, Inc. and Railway Transport Leasing, Inc.

were required to file an Opposition or Statement of Non-opposition by February 28, 2006. Plaintiffs,

however, failed to file either document.1

 Consequently, the Court orders Plaintiffs to file a brief

showing cause as to why they failed to respond to Conagra’s Motion. Plaintiffs shall file their brief by

8:00 a.m., March 20, 2006. Plaintiffs shall also simultaneously file any Opposition or Statement of Nonopposition by this deadline. Failure to respond to this Order shall result in the imposition of sanctions,

including granting Conagra’s Motion. 

Case 3:05-cv-02030-MJJ Document 45 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Further, the March 21, 2006 hearing is VACATED, and will be re-set by the Court, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2006 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-02030-MJJ Document 45 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 2