Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-06654/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-06654-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

XIAOHUA HUANG,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 NEPHOS INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 18-06654 WHA

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S 

JULY 10 LETTER 

The Court has reviewed plaintiff Xiaohua Huang’s “letter to Hon. Judge Alsup and his

argument in the hearing on July 3, 2019,” dated July 10, and defendant Nephos Inc.’s response

thereto (Dkt. Nos. 56–57). To the extent plaintiff’s “letter” seeks reconsideration of the order

granting defendant’s motion to strike and denying plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (Dkt. No.

55), the request is DENIED. Plaintiff has not pointed to any new material fact or law since the

order was entered or shown the order’s “manifest failure” to consider material facts or

dispositive legal arguments. See Civ. L.R. 7-9(b). Instead, plaintiff impermissibly repeats his

oral and written arguments previously made, which were considered in the order dated July 9. 

See Civ. L.R. 7-9(c). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 12, 2019. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:18-cv-06654-WHA Document 58 Filed 07/12/19 Page 1 of 1