Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07875/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07875-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN KARL MOONEY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LOUIS ALEXANDER BOLI, a/k/a MICHAEL

BOLI, BOLI & CASPARI, VICTORIA B.

HENLEY, AND DOES 1-10,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-7875 SI

ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S

CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT BOLI

& CASPARI WITHOUT LEAVE TO

AMEND

By order filed May 21, 2007, the Court granted separate motions filed by defendants Henley and

Boli. That order held that plaintiff’s claims were barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and therefore

that this Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint. In a separate order also filed May

21, 2007, the Court directed plaintiff to show cause by June 1, 2007 why this action should not

dismissed as to defendant Boli & Caspari for the same reason. 

Plaintiff has not filed a response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause. On June 14, 2007, the

Court’s Clerk received a voice message from plaintiff stating that he did not intend to respond to the

Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, based on plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause,

and the record before this Court, the Court finds it appropriate to dismiss this action against the

remaining defendant, Boli & Caspari, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 18, 2007 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-07875-SI Document 44 Filed 06/18/07 Page 1 of 1