Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03533/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03533-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY INGALLS and TONY HONG,

individually and on behalf of all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SPOTIFY USA, INC., a Delaware

corporation, DOES 1–10, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 16-03533 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO

HAC VICE APPLICATION

OF ATTORNEY STEPHEN M.

RUMMAGE

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Stephen M. Rummage (Dkt. No. 19) is DENIED

for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that

“he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the

highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis

added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only

identifies the state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Washington State” — is inadequate

under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does

not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is

submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

Case 3:16-cv-03533-WHA Document 20 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-03533-WHA Document 20 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 2