Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03723/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03723-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1120.02P233 -1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-2800/C03-3723 TEH)

PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)

OK-HEE SHIM, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 240998)

PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

The Latham Square Building

1611 Telegraph Ave., Suite 1450

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-0292

Facsimile: (510) 452-5625

HOWARD MOORE, JR., ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 55228)

MOORE & MOORE

445 Bellevue, Suite 202

Oakland, CA 94610

Telephone: (510) 451-0104

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CLARK WALKER

SILVANO B. MARCHESI (SBN 42965)

County Counsel

BERNARD L. KNAPP (SBN 111720)

Deputy County Counsel

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

651 Pine Street, 9th Floor

Martinez, California 94553

Telephone: (925) 335-1800

Facsimile: (925) 335-1866

Email: bknap@cc.cccounty.us

Attorneys for Defendants

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, ET AL.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARK WALKER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, KEITH

RICHTER, and RICHARD GRACE,

Defendants.

 

AND RELATED CASE.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NOS. C05-2800 TEH 

C03-3723 TEH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME TO

OPPOSE MOTIONS IN LIMINE 

Case 3:03-cv-03723-TEH Document 183 Filed 11/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1120.02P233 -2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (C05-2800/C03-3723 TEH)

1. Plaintiff CLARK WALKER (“Chief Walker”) and Defendants CONTRA

COSTA COUNTY, KEITH RICHTER, and RICHARD GRACE, by and through their respective

counsel, jointly apply for an Order, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, to enlarge the time to file oppositions

to motions in limine by twenty-four (24) hours from October 31, 2006 to November 1, 2006.

2. Good cause exists to enlarge the date to file oppositions to motions in limine to

permit reasonable time to finalize Plaintiff’s oppositions, which was hindered by lead counsel Pamela Y.

Price’s out-of-town travel on another matter and Ok-Hee Shim’s health issues needing immediate medical

attention.

3. Therefore, the parties respectfully request that the time to file oppositions to in

limine motions be enlarged from October 31, 2006 to November 1, 2006.

DATED: October 31, 2006 PRICE AND ASSOCIATES

 /s/

 

OK-HEE SHIM, Attorneys for 

Plaintiff CLARK WALKER

DATED: October 31, 2006 SILVANO B. MARCHESI, County Counsel

 /s/

 

BERNARD L. KNAPP, Deputy County Counsel,

Attorneys for Defendants CONTRA COSTA

COUNTY, KEITH RICHTER, and RICHARD

GRACE

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the time to file oppositions to motions in limine be enlarged from October 31, 2006 to

November 1, 2006.

Date: _____________ 

HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

11/1/06

Case 3:03-cv-03723-TEH Document 183 Filed 11/01/06 Page 2 of 2