Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00707/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00707-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

 RE: INSPECTION OF PROPERTY 

David R. Albers, Esq., State Bar #201423 

DAVID R. ALBERS, INC. 

Attorney at Law 

200 New Stine Road, Suite 220 

Bakersfield, CA 93309 

Telephone: (661) 617-6240 

Facsimile: (661) 617-6238 

Attorneys for Defendants 

IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION 

ASSOCIATION OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS, an ) CASE NO. 1:05-CV-00707-OWW-SMS 

Unincorporated association ) 

 ) STIPULATION AND 

 Plaintiff, ) PROTECTIVE 

 ) ORDER RE: INSPECTION OF 

 vs. ) PROPERTY 

 ) 

FRED SCHAKEL DAIRY, a California Proprietorship ) ORDER 

FRED SCHAKEL, owner and operator, and SCHAKEL ) 

FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, a California Limited ) 

Partnership, owner and operator, ) 

AG RESOURCES III, LLC, and SOUTH LAKES ) 

DAIRY ) 

 ) 

 Defendants ) 

 ) 

 ) 

Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, by agreement of the parties to this action, and for 

good cause shown, it is hereby ordered: 

1. As used in this order, the term “Protected Information” 

means information disclosed, produced, discovered, photographed, 

filmed or otherwise obtained from the inspections of property 

commonly known as South Lakes Dairy located at 5595 Avenue 96, 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00707-LJO-SMS Document 129 Filed 02/27/07 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

 RE: INSPECTION OF PROPERTY 

Pixley, CA 93256, Tulare County, California. Protected 

Information includes all copies and reproductions of such 

information obtained by plaintiff as a result of such inspection, 

which will occur at mutually agreeable times. 

2. The parties shall reach agreement on bio-security 

protocols prior to the inspections. 

3. Protected Information shall not be disclosed or used by 

plaintiff Association of Irritated Residents (“AIR”), members of 

AIR, or by anyone acting by on AIR’s behalf except for purposes 

of litigation in this action, including settlement negotiations, 

pretrial proceedings, preparation for trial, trial, and any 

appeal. Members of AIR may not participate in the inspections 

covered by this order. AIR’s attorneys and experts may not 

disclose Protected Information to members of AIR prior to 

pretrial proceedings. Upon the occurrence of pretrial 

proceedings, Protected Information may be disclosed to those 

members of AIR who need to know for purposes of the trial in this 

action. 

4. AIR’s attorneys may make such copies of all or part of 

the Protected Information as they deem necessary for purposes of 

this action. Any such copy shall be protected in the same manner 

as the originals. 

5. AIR’s attorneys may disclose Protected Information only 

as follows: 

A. AIR's attorneys may disclose Protected Information to 

their staff, including legal interns, working with them for 

purposes of these proceedings, all of whom are bound by this 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00707-LJO-SMS Document 129 Filed 02/27/07 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

 RE: INSPECTION OF PROPERTY 

order without signing a copy of it; 

B. AIR's attorneys may disclose Protected Information to 

such persons with whom they consult, or whom they retain, for 

purposes of preparation for trial, trial proceedings, any other 

proceedings in this action (including settlements), or any 

appeal, but only if, prior to such disclosure, the person to whom 

the Protected Information is disclosed signs an agreement to be 

bound by this order; and 

C. AIR's attorneys may disclose Protected Information to 

any person being deposed by AIR'S attorneys, provided that the 

portions of the transcript (including exhibits) containing 

Protected Information are protected in accordance with this 

order, and provided further that prior to such disclosure the 

deposition reporter, the deponent, and any other persons 

present other than the parties' attorneys sign an agreement to be 

bound by this order or agree on the record of the deposition to 

be bound by this order. If the deponent discloses Protected 

Information during the deposition, the deponent must identify 

such information as protected and that information shall be 

protected in accordance with this order. 

6. Any party may file with this Court such documents 

containing Protected Information as the party deems necessary. 

7. Attorneys for AIR shall make no disclosures of 

Protected Information not expressly permitted by this order 

without the prior written consent of Schakel's attorneys. If 

AIR's attorneys are unable to obtain such consent, AIR may move 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00707-LJO-SMS Document 129 Filed 02/27/07 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

 RE: INSPECTION OF PROPERTY 

the Court for an order permitting such additional disclosure, 

provided that Schakel's attorneys are given at least 5 business 

days written notice of the motion to permit Schakel's attorneys 

to object. If Schakel's attorneys file written objections, 

disclosure shall not be made unless the Court overrules the 

objections. 

8. Within 60 days after the conclusion of this action, 

the attorneys for AIR shall (a) obtain all Protected 

Information, including notes of orally disclosed protected 

information, from the persons to whom they have disclosed it and 

shall then destroy all Protected Information in their 

possession, and (b) forward copies of all signed agreements to 

be bound by this protective order to Schakel's attorneys. The 

terms of this order shall survive the conclusion of this action 

unless otherwise agreed by all parties in writing. 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 

DATED: February 20, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

 DAVID R. ALBERS, INC. 

/s/ David R. Albers 

David R. Albers 

Attorneys for FRED SCHAKEL 

DAIRY, FRED SCHAKEL, SCHAKEL 

FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, AG 

RESOURCES III, LLLC AND 

SOUTH LAKES DAIRY 

DATED: February 20, 2007 CENTER ON RACE, POVERTY & THE 

 ENVIRONMENT 

 

/s/ Brent Newell __

Brent Newell 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Association of Irritated 

Residents 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00707-LJO-SMS Document 129 Filed 02/27/07 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

5 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

 RE: INSPECTION OF PROPERTY 

ORDER 

Good Cause Appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: 2/27/2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

 Sandra M. Snyder 

United States Magistrate Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:05-cv-00707-LJO-SMS Document 129 Filed 02/27/07 Page 5 of 5