Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01870/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01870-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 730
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Report &amp; Disclosure
Cause of Action: 29:0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act

---

1 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: FILING OF 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. CV 08 1870 SC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

Siegel & 

LeWitter 

 1939 Harrison St

Suite 307 

Oakland, CA 

94612 

(510) 452-5000 

(510) 452-5004 

Jonathan H. Siegel #78143 

Latika Malkani #184301 

Sarah Beard #240340 

SIEGEL & LEWITTER 

1939 Harrison Street, Suite 307 

Oakland, California 94612 

(510) 452-5000 

(510) 452-5004 (fax) 

email: jsiegel@sl-employmentlaw.com 

 lmalkani@sl-employmentlaw.com 

 sbeard@sl-employmentlaw.com 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROSIE BYERS, ELLA RAIFORD, 

MARTHA VAZQUEZ, MELL GARCIA, 

J. MICHAEL TORRES, STANLEY LYLES, 

ROBYNE L. HORN and SONIA ASKEW, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL 

UNION, ANDREW L. STERN, 

MARY KAY HENRY, THOMAS V. 

DEBRUIN and ANNA BURGER, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV 08 1870 SC 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION 

AND ORDER RE: FILING OF 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

The parties in the instant case (hereinafter “Byers”) and in Torres et al. v. Service 

Employees International Union et al., No. 08-04368 (EDL) (“Torres”), have conferred through 

counsel regarding the pending Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be 

Related. The parties agree as follows: 

1. The combined group of Byers and Torres plaintiffs will file a Second Amended 

Complaint in Byers. That complaint will combine the allegations that are now in Torres with 

those that are in Byers. The combined group of defendants in the Byers and Torres cases will 

Case 3:08-cv-01870-SC Document 44 Filed 10/03/08 Page 1 of 2
2 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: FILING OF 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. CV 08 1870 SC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

Siegel & 

LeWitter 

 1939 Harrison St

Suite 307 

Oakland, CA 

94612 

(510) 452-5000 

(510) 452-5004 

consent to the filing of such a Second Amended Complaint in Byers. That Second Amended 

Complaint will be filed on or before October 10, 2008. 

2. Once the Second Amended Complaint is filed in Byers, the Torres plaintiffs will 

voluntarily dismiss the Torres complaint without prejudice under Rule 41, thereby mooting the 

“related case” issue raised by Defendants recent administrative motion in Byers, as there would 

then be only one case, Byers. On the understanding that these events will occur, the Byers

Defendants hereby withdraw the Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be 

Related, without prejudice to refiling such a motion in the event Torres is not voluntarily 

dismissed under the circumstances just described. 

 3. The Defendants in Byers hereby take the pending motions to dismiss and to 

strike in Byers off calendar, without prejudice to refiling appropriate motions after being served 

with the Second Amended Complaint in Byers. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 3, 2008 SIEGEL & LEWITTER 

 By: /s/ Latika Malkani 

 Latika Malkani 

 

 Attorneys for All Plaintiffs 

Dated: October 3, 2008 BREDHOFF & KAISER 

 By: /s/ Leon Dayan 

 Leon Dayan 

 Attorneys for All Defendants 

ORDER 

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered. 

Dated: __________, 2008 

 The Honorable Samuel Conti, 

 USDC ND, Senior Judge 

10/3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:08-cv-01870-SC Document 44 Filed 10/03/08 Page 2 of 2