Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-02765/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-02765-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

KENNETH HOLCOMB, 

Plaintiff,

v.

CAL TERHUNE, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 03-2765 RMW (PVT)

INTERIM ORDER RE PARTIES’

PROPOSED FORM OF PROTECTIVE

ORDER

On December 28, 2006, the parties filed a Stipulated Protective Order.1 Having reviewed the

form of protective order submitted by the parties, the court finds it appropriate to issue this interim

order. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than January 30, 2007, the parties shall file a

revised form of protective order that makes the following changes:

1. Describes the information that may be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” as

“information (regardless of how generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things

that qualify for protection under standards developed under F.R.Civ.P. 26(c)” without

elaboration or examples;

2. Revises the order to be mutual and provide protection to any party or non-party who

designates information Confidential;

Case 5:03-cv-02765-RMW Document 58 Filed 01/17/07 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

3. Omits any requirement that court personnel or stenographers hired by the court sign a

non-disclosure agreement; and

4. Revises Paragraph 7 to require compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5.

The court notes that there is a model form of protective order in the “Forms” section of the

court’s website (www.cand.uscourts.gov) that the parties may wish to use, in whole or part, as a

model for complying with the requirements of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending entry of the final form of protective order, the

provisions of the parties’ proposed form of protective order, as modified herein, shall govern the

handling of confidential information exchanged or disclosed during discovery in this case.

Dated: 1/17/07

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:03-cv-02765-RMW Document 58 Filed 01/17/07 Page 2 of 2