Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01107/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01107-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. 3:12-cv-01107 LB

ORDER

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

RAHILA KHAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

RECONTRUST COMPANY, et al.

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. 3:12-cv-01107 LB

ORDER EXTENDING THE

BRIEFING DEADLINES AND THE

HEARING DATE FOR

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Re: ECF No. 155]

Bank of America filed a motion for summary judgment on May 12, 2015. (Motion, ECF No.

152.) Ms. Khan, who is proceeding pro se but nevertheless is an e-filer on the court’s ECF system,

was served with the motion via ECF notification on that same day. This means that the deadline for

her to file an opposition to Bank of America’s motion was May 26, 2015. N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-3(a).

On that day, instead of filing an opposition, Ms. Khan filed a letter asking for more time because she

never received a hard copy of the motion and exhibits from Bank of America. (Letter, ECF No. 155.)

Correspondence between Ms. Khan and Bank of America, however, shows that Bank of America’s

counsel sent Ms. Khan, as a courtesy, PDF files of the documents and also printed the documents for

her to pick up at Bank of America’s counsel’s office, per Ms. Khan’s request. (See Wittemore Decl.,

Exs. A-F, ECF No. 156.) She never picked them up. (Id. ¶ 10.) 

Regardless, the issue now is what to do about the briefing on and hearing date for Bank of

Case 3:12-cv-01107-LB Document 157 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 2
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. 3:12-cv-01107 LB

ORDER 2

America’s pending summary judgment motion. Given her pro se status and good faith efforts during

this litigation, the court will give her until Monday, June 8, 2015 to file an opposition to Bank of

America’s motion for summary judgment. The court asks that Bank of America mail Ms. Khan a

hard copy of its motion and accompanying documents. Ms. Khan may either arrange to pick up the

hard copy documents that apparently are still waiting for her at Bank of America’s counsel’s office

or wait to receive them in the mail, but in either case her opposition must be filed by June 8, 2015.

Bank of America may file any reply by June 15, 2015. The court also continues the hearing on the

motion from June 18, 2015 to June 25, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States

District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102.

It also appears that Bank of America never sent chambers copies of its motion and

accompanying documents to the court. The court orders Bank of America to deliver chambers copies

to the court no later than 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, May 28, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 27, 2015 _______________________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:12-cv-01107-LB Document 157 Filed 05/27/15 Page 2 of 2