Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00759/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00759-53/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EFRAIN MUNOZ, et al., individually and 

on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PHH CORP., et. al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:08-cv-00759-DAD-BAM

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

FILE OUT OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC

(Doc. No. 357)

On October 5, 2016, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking leave to file out of time nunc pro 

tunc. (Doc. No. 357.) Specifically, plaintiffs timely filed their opposition to defendants’ motion 

for decertification (Doc. No. 353) and opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment 

(Doc. No. 354) on October 4, 2016. However, plaintiffs filed the exhibits and supporting 

statements of fact (Doc. No. 355) in connection with that opposition on October 5, 2016, several 

hours after the filing deadline. It appears clear that plaintiff’s late filing was related to the court’s

very recent order (Doc. No. 356) approving the filing of redacted briefs and place holder exhibits

that had been discussed with the court the evening before. (See Doc. No. 357 at 2.) Plaintiffs 

represent to the court that defendants have no objection to the relief requested in their motion. 

(Id. at 3.)

/////

Case 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM Document 358 Filed 10/06/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, upon consideration of plaintiffs’ unopposed administrative motion for leave 

to file out of time nunc pro tunc, the court hereby grants the motion (Doc. No. 357) and orders 

that Doc. No. 355 be deemed filed timely on October 4, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 6, 2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM Document 358 Filed 10/06/16 Page 2 of 2