Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06241/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06241-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LELAND DRAPER, ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, )

at al., ) 

 )

Defendants. )

)

 )

1:04-cv-6241-AWI-SMS 

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION

WITH PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER

OF THE COURT, TO PROSECUTE, AND

TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH

RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED (DOCS. 1,

4, 8)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner housed at the Fresno County

Jail who is proceeding pro se with an action for damages and

other relief concerning alleged civil rights violations. The

matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304. 

On November 2, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and

a recommendation that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice

for Plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint to state a

claim upon which relief might be granted. The findings and

recommendation were served on all parties on November 2, 2006,

and contained notice that any objections to the findings and

Case 1:04-cv-06241-AWI -SMS Document 10 Filed 12/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the

date of service of the order. No party filed any objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo th

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the findings and recommendation are

supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation filed November 2, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The action IS DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and

3. The Clerk of Court IS DIRECTED to close this action

because this order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 22, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06241-AWI -SMS Document 10 Filed 12/26/06 Page 2 of 2