Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00095/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00095-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KELVIN X. SINGLETON, 

Plaintiff,

v.

A. HEDGEPATH, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:08-cv-00095-AWI-GSA-PC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS 

(Doc. 61.)

ORDER WITHDRAWING MOTION TO

DISMISS 

(Doc. 51.)

ORDER VACATING ORDER REQUIRING

DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO

MOTION

(Doc. 55.)

 

Plaintiff Kelvin X. Singleton (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the

complaint on January 18, 2008. (Doc. 1.) This case now proceeds on the Second Amended

Complaint, filed on February 12, 2009, against defendants CMO A. Youssef, CMO S. Lopez, Dr.

J. Akanno, Dr. S. Qamar, Dr. Vasquez, RN II M. Ali, and RN II M. Wright-Pearson

(“Defendants”) for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs in violation of the

Eighth Amendment. (Doc. 26.) 

On April 8, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss defendant Dr. J. Akanno from this

action. (Doc. 61.) On April 16, 2010, the court issued an order requiring Defendants to file a

1

Case 1:08-cv-00095-EPG Document 63 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

response to Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss within thirty days. (Doc. 55.) On April 29, 2010,

Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw his motion to dismiss. (Doc. 61.) 

Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his motion to dismiss shall be

granted. In addition, the court’s order of April 16, 2010, requiring Defendants to file a response

to the motion to dismiss, shall be vacated.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his motion to dismiss, is GRANTED;

2. The motion to dismiss defendant Dr. J. Akanno, filed by Plaintiff on April 8,

2010, is WITHDRAWN;

3. The court’s order of April 16, 2010, requiring Defendants to file a response to

Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss, is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 4, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-00095-EPG Document 63 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 2