Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01044/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01044-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1044

CASSANDRA JEAN FRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

C.S.J.W.,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRENNAN WIMBISH; CHRISTY A. ZLATKUS; J.B. MEALY AND 

ASSOCIATES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District 

Judge. (8:14-cv-03875-DKC)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cassandra Jean Fry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1044 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Cassandra Jean Fry appeals the district court’s orders

remanding this removed action to state court for lack of 

jurisdiction and denying reconsideration. An order remanding a 

case to state court is generally not reviewable on appeal or 

otherwise. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012). The Supreme Court has 

limited the scope of § 1447(d), prohibiting appellate review of 

remand orders based on a defect in the removal procedure or lack 

of subject matter jurisdiction. Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. 

Co., 517 U.S. 706, 711-12 (1996); see 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) 

(2012). In this case, remand was based on lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction over a child custody dispute. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

 

DISMISSED

Appeal: 15-1044 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 2