Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02058/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02058-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

This Order Relates To:

CRAGO d/b/a DASH COMPUTERS, INC., 

et al., on its own behalf and on behalf of 

similarly situated parties,

 Plaintiff,

v.

MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC 

CORPORATION, et al.,

 Defendants.

 MDL No. 1917

Case No. 3:14-cv-02058-JST

Master Case No. C-07-5944 JST

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR 

SEALING MOTION DECLARATIONS

The Mitsubishi Defendants filed an “Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Pursuant to 

Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5.” ECF No. 4627 (“Sealing Motion”). In it, they mistakenly 

identified the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs as the Designating Party under Civil Local Rule 79-5(e). 

However, the correct Designating Parties are the SDI Defendants, the Hitachi Defendants, 

Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., the Panasonic Defendants, the Philips Defendants, and 

the Toshiba Defendants. See ECF No. 4650 at 3. These latter parties were not provided copies of 

the materials proposed to be sealed or placed on notice that they needed to file declarations. It is 

their interests that might be harmed if the Court denies the Sealing Motion for lack of support. 

To avoid this unfairness, the Mitsubishi Defendants now request that the proper 

Designating Parties be given an opportunity to file declarations. The Court agrees. The 

Case 3:14-cv-02058-JST Document 89 Filed 05/12/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Mitsubishi Defendants are ordered to provide all materials otherwise required by Civil Local Rule 

79-5(e) to the correct Designating Parties no later than May 13, 2016, and file a proof of service 

on the Court’s docket. The deadline for responses from the proper Designating Parties is extended 

to May 19, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2016

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-02058-JST Document 89 Filed 05/12/16 Page 2 of 2