Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01144/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01144-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VIRGINIA GOATCHER,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:09-cv-01144 JLT

ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE

PARTIES

[Doc. 16]

The parties to the action stipulate that remand is necessary to:

(1) update the medical evidence concerning the Plaintiff’s physical and mental conditions

and to further consider the Plaintiff's residual functional capacity;

(2) further consider Plaintiff's subsequent applications filed on or about March 18, 2009,

which the agency denied at the reconsideration level on or about December 8, 2009; and

(3) obtain evidence from a vocational expert to clarify the effect of the nonexertional

limitations on the claimant's occupational base.

The Court GRANTS the stipulation to remand and the action is REMANDED to the

Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). In so ordering, the COURT makes no

comment upon the substantive areas outlined by the parties as the stipulated scope of the review by the

1

Case 1:09-cv-01144-JLT Document 17 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Administrative Law Judge upon remand.

The Clerk is ordered to ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR of Plaintiff and against Defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 5, 2010 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

9j7khi UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

2

Case 1:09-cv-01144-JLT Document 17 Filed 04/05/10 Page 2 of 2