Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02669/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02669-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

0

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITATION RE OPPO. TO MSJ//3:18-cv-02669-WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EDUARDO G. ROY (State Bar No. 146316)

PROMETHEUS PARTNERS L.L.P.

388 Market Street, Suite 950

San Francisco, CA 94111

Tel.: 415.527.0255

Eduardo.roy@prometheus-law.com

Attorneys for Tribal Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JW GAMING DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A

CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY 

COMPANY,

 

 Plaintiff,

v.

ANGELA JAMES; LEONA L. WILLIAMS; 

MICHAEL R. CANALES; MELISSA M. 

CANALES; JOHN TANG; PINOLEVILLE 

POMO NATION, A FEDERALLYRECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE; 

PINOLEVILLE GAMING AUTHORITY; 

PINOLEVILLE GAMING COMMISSION; 

PINOLEVILLE BUSINESS

BOARD;PINOLEVILLE ECONOMIC 

DEVELOPMENT, LLC; A CALIFORNIA 

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; LENORA 

STEELE; KATHY STALLWORTH; 

MICHELLE CAMPBELL; JULIAN J. 

MALDONADO; DONALD WILLIAMS;

VERONICA TIMBERLAKE; CASSANDRA 

STEELE; JASON EDWARD RUNNING 

BEAR STEELE; ANDREW STEVENSON; 

CANALES GROUP, LLC, A CALIFORNIA 

LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY; LORI J. CANALES; KELLY L. 

CANALES; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 20,

 Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:18-cv-02669-WHO

STIPULATION TO PERMIT TRIBAL 

DEFENDANTS TO EXCEED PAGE 

LIMITATION OF MEMORANDUM IN 

OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

Courtroom 2, 17th Floor

Hon. William H. Orrick

///

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:18-cv-02669-WHO Document 209 Filed 05/05/20 Page 1 of 3
1

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITATION RE OPPO. TO MSJ//3:18-cv-02669-WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 STIPULATION

Plaintiff and Tribal Defendants, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and 

agree as follows:

1. WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its pending Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt 191) (“MSJ”) with 

a 24-page memorandum seeking a summary judgment of over 16 million dollars against 11 

separate individuals and four separate entities (“Tribal Defendants”), which omits a statement 

of issues and includes 17 single-spaced footnotes, 44 lines in length, 34 legal authorities, some 

70 or more alleged material facts, and dozens of exhibits that are hundreds of pages in length; 

2. WHERAS, Tribal Defendants will be filing an opposition memorandum responding to all of 

the matters raised and omitted by Plaintiff in its MSJ, including extensive legal briefing and

opposing facts and evidence, and a motion to strike and evidentiary objections that must be 

included in the opposition memorandum by Local Rule, as well as additional facts and law 

concerning one or more affirmative defenses.

3. WHEREAS, counsel for the Tribal Defendants believe they cannot adequately and 

meaningfully present all of this information in their anticipated memorandum in opposition to 

the MSJ in under 35 pages.

4. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed that Tribal Defendants may file a 

memorandum supporting their opposition to the MSJ which exceeds the 25-page limitation by 

10 pages, totaling 35 pages. In stipulating to this request, Plaintiff does not concede or 

otherwise take any position on any representations herein, including those representations in 

paragraph 1 hereof; Plaintiff merely stipulates to Tribal Defendants’ request to exceed the 25-

page limitation by 10 pages.

///

Dated: May 1, 2020 Fredericks. Peebles & Patterson LLP

Case 3:18-cv-02669-WHO Document 209 Filed 05/05/20 Page 2 of 3
2

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITATION RE OPPO. TO MSJ//3:18-cv-02669-WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 By: __/s/______Gregory M. Narvaez____

 Gregory M. Narvaez

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: May 1, 2020 Prometheus Partners L.L.P.

 By: ___/s/ Eduardo G. Roy_______________

 Eduardo G. Roy

 Attorneys for Tribal Defendants

 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Tribal Defendants may file a memorandum in opposition to 

Plaintiff’s pending Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt 191) not to exceed 35 pages in length without 

Court permission.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 5, 2020 

 __________________________________________

 JUDGE OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT 

Case 3:18-cv-02669-WHO Document 209 Filed 05/05/20 Page 3 of 3