Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05812/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05812-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

INTERSERVE, INC. DBA

TECHCRUNCH, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FUSION GARAGE PTE LTD.,

Defendant. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C-09-05812 RS (PVT)

ORDER DISSOLVING APRIL 28,

2010 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

[Docket No. 88]

On April 28, 2010, the court ordered plaintiffs Interserve, Inc. doing business as

TechCrunch and CrunchPad, Inc. to show cause why non-confidential portions of the Rule

30(b)(6) transcript of Michael Arrington cannot be de-designated no later than May 6, 2010. 

(“April 28, 2010 Order to Show Cause”). 

In response to the April 28, 2010 Order to Show Cause, plaintiffs state that “[they] can

meet the May 6 deadline.” See Docket No. 92. In light of plaintiffs’ response, the April 28,

2010 Order to Show Cause is hereby dissolved.

Defendant Fusion Garage shall advise whether it has further challenges to any

confidentiality designations for the Rule 30(b)(6) transcript no later than May 14, 2010. See 

Case 3:09-cv-05812-RS Document 100 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

Docket No. 66. Plaintiffs may file their response, if any, no later than May 21, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2010

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05812-RS Document 100 Filed 04/30/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 3

Case 3:09-cv-05812-RS Document 100 Filed 04/30/10 Page 3 of 3