Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00154/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00154-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT WILT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DR. GREENLEAF, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00154-BAM-PC

ORDER DISMISSING THIS ACTION FOR 

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND 

FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

(ECF NO. 19)

Plaintiff Robert Wilt is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(c).1 

On February 2, 2016, the Court dismissed the first amended complaint and granted 

Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff was warned that if 

he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s order, this action would be 

dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim. (Id. at 7:6.) On April 4, 

2016, Plaintiff was granted a thirty day extension of time. Plaintiff failed to file an amended 

complaint, and on May 31, 2016, an order to show cause was entered, directing Plaintiff to show 

cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute. 

Plaintiff was provided fourteen days in which to respond. Plaintiff was again warned that 

 

1

Plaintiff filed a consent to proceed before a magistrate judge on February 6, 2015. (ECF No. 5.)

Case 1:15-cv-00154-BAM Document 20 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

failure to respond would result in dismissal of his action for failure to prosecute and failure to 

state a claim. (ECF No. 19 at 3:2.) To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show 

cause, nor has he otherwise been in contact with the Court. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim 

upon which relief could be granted; and

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 5, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00154-BAM Document 20 Filed 07/05/16 Page 2 of 2