Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-05180/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-05180-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION

1 Case No. 3:18-cv-05180-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ATAIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff,

v.

DENMAY, INC., a California corporation, d/b/a 

BLUE ORANGE USA; JULIEN MAYOT, an 

individual; THIERRY DENOUAL, an 

individual,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:18-cv-05180-CRB

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR

DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE

Whereas, Plaintiff Atain Specialty Insurance Company filed its Complaint for Declaratory 

Relief against Defendants Denmay, Inc. d/b/a Blue Orange USA (“Denmay”), Julien Mayot 

(“Mayot”) and Thierry Denoual (“Denoual”) (collectively “Defendants”) on August 23, 2018 (Dkt. 

1).

Whereas, thereafter service was made on all parties. 

Whereas, Denoual filed an answer to the complaint on January 25, 2019 (Dkt 23).

Whereas, Denmay filed and answer to the complaint and counterclaim on January 25, 2019 

(Dkt 26) and Atain filed an answer to Denmay’s counterclaim on February 22, 2019 (Dkt. 30).

Whereas, Mayot filed an answer to the complaint on February 1, 2019 (Dkt 28).

Whereas, on June 18, 2018, the Court entered an order granting the parties’ stipulation to 

Case 3:18-cv-05180-CRB Document 35 Filed 06/14/19 Page 1 of 2
ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION

2 Case No. 3:18-cv-05180-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

extend the deadlines for the filing of responsive pleadings and the date of the Case Management 

Conference to allow the parties to attempt to resolve the disputes between them in the underlying 

action and this litigation in a global mediation (Dkt. 14)

Whereas, on April 10, 2019, Denmay notified the court that the case had settled and 

requested the April 19, 2019 Case Management Conference be continued 30-60 days pending 

finalization of the settlement agreement (Dkt. 30).

Whereas, on April 11, 2019, the Court issued a notice vacating the April 19,2019 conference 

and ordering a dismissal be filed by June 15, 2019. 

Whereas, final settlement has been reached as to all parties and all causes of action and all 

terms of the settlement have been met;

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing the Court rules as 

follows:

1. The above-captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, as against all Defendants and

Counter-Defendant, with prejudice and with each side to bear its own costs;

2. The Action is terminated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

United States District Judge

4816-7775-6824, v. 1

June 14, 2019

Case 3:18-cv-05180-CRB Document 35 Filed 06/14/19 Page 2 of 2