Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04908/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04908-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING 

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFS.’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

COMPL, PLTFS.’ OPP. BRIEF, AND DEFS.’ REPLY 

BRIEF; CASE NO. C-04-4908-JW(PVT) 

UTSI_ Joint Stip and Proposed Order Extending Page 

Limits_(PALIB1_2889282_1) (2).DOC 

TERRY T. JOHNSON, State Bar No. 121569 (tjohnson@wsgr.com) 

BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838 (boris.feldman@wsgr.com) 

CHERYL W. FOUNG, State Bar No. 108868 (cfoung@wsgr.com) 

BAHRAM SEYEDIN-NOOR, State Bar No. 203244 (bnoor@wsgr.com) 

BRYAN KETROSER, State Bar No 239105 (bketroser@wsgr.com) 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

tjohnson@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendants

UTSTARCOM, INC., HONG LIANG LU, 

MICHAEL J. SOPHIE, HOWARD KWOCK 

GERALD S. SOLOWAY, SHAO-NING J. CHOU, 

WILLIAM H. HUANG, YING WU, AND 

THOMAS J. TOY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IN RE UTSTARCOM, INC. 

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

)

)

)

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Master File No. C-04-4908-JW(PVT) 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING 

PAGE LIMITS FOR UTSTARCOM 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS SECOND AMENDED 

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT, 

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION BRIEF, 

AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEF 

Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 136 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 1 of 4 Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 139 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING 

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFS.’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

COMPL., PLTFS.’ OPP. BRIEF, AND DEFS.’ REPLY 

BRIEF; CASE NO. C-04-4908-JW(PVT) 

-1- UTSI_ Joint Stip and Proposed Order Extending Page 

Limits_(PALIB1_2889282_1) (2).DOC 

WHEREAS, on April 13, 2006, Plaintiffs filed a three hundred and seventy-eight 

paragraph Second Amended Consolidated Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws 

consisting of 150 pages and 108 pages of exhibits and asserting a class period of thirty-three 

months;

WHEREAS, Civil L.R. 7-2(b) and Civil L.R. 7-3(a) and (c) provide for page limits that 

are not sufficient for the contemplated Motion to Dismiss and supporting memorandum that 

Defendants UTStarcom, Inc., Hong Liang Lu, Michael J. Sophie, Howard Kwock, Gerald S. 

Soloway, Shao-Ning J. Chou, William H. Huang, Ying Wu, and Thomas Toy (collectively, 

“Defendants”) anticipate filing on June 2, 2006, and that plaintiffs anticipate opposing, in that the 

parties desire to address the numerous allegations in a comprehensive and thorough fashion; 

WHEREAS, this Court previously granted extensions of the page limits with the former 

contemplated Motion to Dismiss and Opposition and Reply, which pleadings were never filed; 

WHEREAS, Defendants believe that they need no more than 45 pages for their Motion to 

Dismiss and supporting memorandum; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs believe they need no more than 45 pages for their Opposition to 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Brief; and 

WHEREAS, Defendants believe that they need no more than 25 pages for their Reply 

Brief;

THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows: 

1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Reply Brief will not exceed 45 and 25 pages, 

respectively, exclusive of the caption page, the table of contents, table of authorities, declarations, 

and exhibits. 

2. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Brief will not exceed 45 

pages, exclusive of the caption page, the table of contents, table of authorities, declarations, and 

exhibits.

Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 136 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 2 of 4 Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 139 Filed 06/01/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING 

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFS.’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

COMPL., PLTFS.’ OPP. BRIEF, AND DEFS.’ REPLY 

BRIEF; CASE NO. C-04-4908-JW(PVT) 

-2- UTSI_ Joint Stip and Proposed Order Extending Page 

Limits_(PALIB1_2889282_1) (2).DOC 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: May 31, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

 Professional Corporation 

 

By: /s/ Cheryl Foung 

 Cheryl Foung 

Attorneys for Defendants

UTSTARCOM, INC., HONG LIANG LU, 

MICHAEL J. SOPHIE, HOWARD KWOCK 

GERALD S. SOLOWAY, SHAO-NING J. CHOU, 

WILLIAM H. HUANG, YING WU, AND 

THOMAS J. TOY 

Dated: May 31, 2006 LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER 

RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 

By: /s/ Kimberly Epstein 

 KIMBERLY EPSTEIN 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

I, Terry T. Johnson, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation to Expand Page Limits and [Proposed] Order. I hereby attest that Cheryl W. Foung 

and Kimberly C. Epstein concur in this filing. 

Dated: May 31, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ TERRY T. JOHNSON 

 TERRY T. JOHNSON 

Attorneys for Defendants UTStarcom Inc., 

Hong Liang Lu, Michael J. Sophie, Howard 

Kwock, Gerald S. Soloway, Shao-Ning J. 

Chou, William H. Huang, Ying Wu, and 

Thomas Toy 

Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 136 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 3 of 4 Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 139 Filed 06/01/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXPANDING 

PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFS.’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

COMPL., PLTFS.’ OPP. BRIEF, AND DEFS.’ REPLY 

BRIEF; CASE NO. C-04-4908-JW(PVT) 

-3- UTSI_ Joint Stip and Proposed Order Extending Page 

Limits_(PALIB1_2889282_1) (2).DOC 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 The Honorable James Ware 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 136 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 4 of 4

JUNE 1, 2006 /S/ JAMES WARE

Case 5:04-cv-04908-JW Document 139 Filed 06/01/06 Page 4 of 4