Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05235-141/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING POST-TRIAL BRIEFING 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PAUL 

HASTINGS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

875 15TH STREET, N.W. 

WASHINGTON, DC 20005 

Frank E. Scherkenbach (SBN 142549) 

scherkenbach@fr.com 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

One Marina Park Drive 

Boston, MA 02110-2804 

Telephone: (617) 542-5070 

Facsimile: (617) 542-8906 

Howard G. Pollack (SBN 162897) 

pollack@fr.com 

Michael R. Headley (SBN 220834) 

headley@fr.com 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 

Redwood City, CA 94063 

Telephone: (650) 839-5070 

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. 

Blair M. Jacobs (admitted pro hac vice)

blairjacobs@paulhastings.com 

Christina A. Ondrick (admitted pro hac vice) 

christinaondrick@paulhastings.com 

Charles J. Hawkins (admitted pro hac vice) 

charleshawkins@paulhastings.com 

PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

875 15th Street NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

Telephone: (202) 551-1700 

Facsimile: (202) 551-1705 

Yar R. Chaikovsky (SBN: 175421) 

yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com 

PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

1117 S. California Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 320-1800 

Attorneys for Defendants FAIRCHILD 

SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION, and FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) 

CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD 

SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and 

FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C-09-5235-MMC (MEJ)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING POST-TRIAL 

BRIEFING 

This Stipulation is between Plaintiff Power Integrations, Inc. (“Power Integrations”) and 

Defendants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. and 

Fairchild (Taiwan) Corp. (“Fairchild”). 

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 937 Filed 01/14/16 Page 1 of 4
- 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING POST-TRIAL BRIEFING 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PAUL 

HASTINGS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

875 15TH STREET, N.W. 

WASHINGTON, DC 20005 

WHEREAS on December 18, 2015, the Court entered Judgment in the above-captioned 

case (Dkt. No. 922); 

WHEREAS any motions pursuant to Rule 50 or Rule 59 (including renewed motions for 

judgment as a matter of law, new trial, and/or interest) must be filed no later than 28 days after 

the entry of judgment; 

WHEREAS the parties expect to file renewed Rule 50 and/or Rule 59 motions (including 

motions requesting judgment as a matter of law, new trial, and interest) pursuant to the applicable 

rules; 

WHEREAS Power Integrations has filed a Renewed Motion Requesting a Declaration that 

this Case Is Exceptional and for Award of Enhanced Damages and Attorneys’ Fees (Dkt. No. 

931) (“Motion for Enhanced Damages and Attorneys’ Fees”); 

WHEREAS the parties also intend to file post-trial motions other than motions for 

renewed judgment as a matter of law, motions for new trial, and Power Integrations’ Motion for 

Enhanced Damages and Attorneys’ Fees; 

WHEREAS the parties and their counsel have scheduling constraints that cause conflicts 

with the deadlines derived under the applicable rules; 

WHEREAS the parties agree to extend the deadlines for filing Rule 50 and/or Rule 59 

motions; 

WHEREAS the parties agree to extend the deadline for Fairchild to respond to Power 

Integrations’ Motion for Enhanced Damages and Attorneys’ Fees; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 by and among the 

parties, and the parties do jointly hereby request that the Court enter an order providing that the 

briefs relating to motions pursuant to Rule 50 and Rule 59 are scheduled to be submitted 

according to the following schedule: 

Motions and Opening Briefs on February 12, 2016; 

Opposition Briefs on March 25, 2016; and 

Reply Briefs on April 15, 2016. 

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 937 Filed 01/14/16 Page 2 of 4
- 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING POST-TRIAL BRIEFING 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PAUL 

HASTINGS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

875 15TH STREET, N.W. 

WASHINGTON, DC 20005 

The parties further stipulate and request that the remaining briefing on Power Integrations’ 

Motion for Enhanced Damages and Attorneys’ Fees should be extended to be briefed on the 

aforementioned schedule, with a deadline of March 25, 2016 for Fairchild’s opposition and Power 

Integrations’ reply due on April 15, 2016. 

DATED: January 13, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

BLAIR M. JACOBS 

PAUL HASTINGS LLP 

By: /s/ Blair M. Jacobs 

Blair M. Jacobs 

Attorneys for Defendants 

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTR 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD 

SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and 

FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION, 

Dated: January 13, 2016 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ Michael R. Headley 

 Michael R. Headley 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. 

 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel 

for Plaintiff. 

Dated: January 13, 2016 PAUL HASTINGS LLP

By: /s/ Blair M. Jacobs 

 Blair M. Jacobs 

Attorneys for Defendants 

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD 

SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and 

FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 937 Filed 01/14/16 Page 3 of 4
- 3 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING POST-TRIAL BRIEFING 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PAUL 

HASTINGS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

875 15TH STREET, N.W. 

WASHINGTON, DC 20005 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FINDING GOOD CAUSE, IT IS SO 

ORDERED. 

1. Absent a court order approving the filing of any additional post-trial motions,1

Fairchild is hereby DIRECTED to file no more than a single motion for judgment as a 

matter of law, or, in the alternative, for a new trial, and Power Integrations is hereby 

DIRECTED to file no more than a single motion for prejudgment interest. 

2. A hearing on the parties' post-trial motions is hereby SCHEDULED for May 13, 

2016. 

 

Dated: ___________, 2016 By: _______________________________ 

 MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

 United States District Judge 

 

1

 The Court is in receipt of Power Integrations's Motion for Enhanced Damages and 

Attorneys' Fees, which the Court will consider on the above-referenced schedule. 

January 14 , with the following directive and addition of a hearing date:

Case 3:09-cv-05235-MMC Document 937 Filed 01/14/16 Page 4 of 4