Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02568/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02568-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR,

2 crowther@caldwell

3 lee@caldwell

4 cjohnson@caldwell

5 Los Angeles, California 90017

6 Facsimile: (213) 629

8 JEFFREY I. CARTON (pro hac vice pending)

7

9 ROBERT J. BERG (pro hac vice pending)

10 2 Westchester Park Drive, Suite 410

11 Telephone: (914) 331

15

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12

13

14

17

18 Plaintiff,

19

22

20

21

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. CV15-2568-WHA

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

ROBYN C. CROWTHER, State Bar No. 193840

CALDWELL

LESLIE &

PROCTOR

PC

LENNETTE W. LEE, State Bar No. 263023

-leslie.com

CAMERON J. JOHNSON, State Bar No. 266729

-leslie.com

725 South Figueroa Street, 31st Floor

-leslie.com

Telephone: (213) 629

-5524

-

DENLEA & CARTON

9040

-9022

jcarton@denleacarton.com

rberg@denleacarton.com

White Plains, New York 10604

Facsimile: (914) 331

-0100

-

Attorneys for KATHRYN WORKMAN

0105

UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

Defendants.

COURT

KATHRYN WORKMAN, on behalf of herself 

and all others similarly situated,

v.

PLUM INC., D/B/A/ PLUM ORGANICS, and 

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY,

Case No. CV15-2568-WHA

Honorable William H. Alsup

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-02568-WHA Document 36 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 3
2 Plaintiff Kathryn Workman and Defendant Plum, PBC d/b/a Plum Organics (

1

3 as Plum Inc.) (collectively, the “Parties”)

4 stipulate as follows:

5 WHEREAS, on June 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in the above

6 WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter is scheduled for 

7 Thursday, September 17, 2015

8 WHEREAS, Defendant Plum, PBC (“Plum”) filed its Motion to Dismiss the Complaint

9 (“Motion”) on August 27, 2015

10 WHEREAS, Plum’s Motion is scheduled to be heard on Thursday, October 29, 2015, at 

11

12 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that, to conserve the Parties’ resources as well as those of 

13 the Court, the Initial Case Management Conference should be continued so that it may occur on 

14

15 WHEREAS, NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel

16 HEREBY STIPULATE AND REQUEST that the Initial Case Management Conference be 

17 continued from September 17, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. to October 29, 2015, at 8:00 a.m.

18 deadlines associated with the Initial Case Management Conference, including the Parties’ 

19 deadlines to complete their conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and to 

20 make initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1), be continued accordingly.

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- Case No. CV15-2568-WHA

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CALDWELL

LESLIE &

PROCTOR

STIPULATION

1

, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby 

erroneously sued 

-captioned action;

, at 11:00 a.m.;

;

8:00 a.m.;

the same day as the hearing on Plum’s Motion;

,

, and that the 

//

//

//

//

//

on August 31, 2015.

1

The Complaint also named Campbell Soup Company (“CSC”) as a Defendant. On August 26, 

2015, the Parties stipulated to dismiss CSC. CSC was dismissed

Case 3:15-cv-02568-WHA Document 36 Filed 09/02/15 Page 2 of 3
1 IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2 DATED: 

7

DATED: September 

3

4

5

6

8

12 Pursuant to Plaintiff Kathryn Workman and Defendant Plum, PBC d/b/a Plum Organics’s 

9

10

11

13 (erroneously sued as Plum Inc.) (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulation, it is HEREBY ORDERED 

14 that the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter is continued from Thursday, 

15 September 17, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. to Thursday, October 29, 2015, at 8:00 a.m. All deadlines 

16 associated with the Initial Case Management Conference, including the Parties’ deadlines to 

17 complete their conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and to make initial 

18 disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1),

19 IT IS SO ORDERED.

20 DATED: _________________ _______________________________

21 HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP 

24 I, Robyn C. Crowther, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5.1(i)(3), that 

22

23

25 concurrence to filing this document has been obtained from each signat

26 By: /s/ Robyn C. Crowther

27

28

-2- Case No. CV15-2568-WHA

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1, 2015 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR,

CALDWELL

LESLIE &

PROCTOR

September PC

By /s/ Robyn C. Crowther

ROBYN C. CROWTHER

Attorneys for KATHRYN WORKMAN

1, 2015 MAYER BROWN LLP

By /s/ Keri E. Borders 

KERI E. BORDERS

Attorneys for PLUM INC., d/b/a PLUM ORGANICS

[PROPOSED] ORDER

United States District Judge

are continued accordingly.

ATTESTATION

ory.

September 2, 2015.

Case 3:15-cv-02568-WHA Document 36 Filed 09/02/15 Page 3 of 3