Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-01339/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-01339-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Petitioner’s objections were filed on May 10, 2005 and have been forwarded to the

district court for review. So long as petitioner keeps the court apprised of his current address, he

will be notified of any order that issues concerning the April 14, 2005 findings and

recommendations.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEJUAN MINOR,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-00-1339 LKK JFM P

vs.

ANTHONY NEWLAND, Warden, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

On May 19, 2005, petitioner submitted a request regarding his findings and

recommendations.1 That document was not served on respondent. Petitioner is advised that

every document submitted to the court for consideration must be served on respondent. Fed. R.

Civ. P. 5; Rule 11, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. Documents not to be served electronically

are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. Mail. If an attorney has filed a document with

the court on behalf of respondent, then documents submitted by petitioner must be served on that

attorney and not on the respondent himself. Every document submitted conventionally to the

court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate stating the date an accurate

Case 2:00-cv-01339-LKK -JFM Document 39 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

copy of the document was mailed to respondent or his attorney and the address to which it was

mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s May 19, 2005 request

regarding his findings and recommendations will be placed in the court file and disregarded. 

Petitioner is cautioned that failure to properly serve any documents subsequently filed in this

action, and failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, will result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed.

DATED: June 2, 2005.

/kf

mino1339.135 

Case 2:00-cv-01339-LKK -JFM Document 39 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2