Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00198/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00198-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 The original due date was July 2, 2007. The Court is unaware of Defendants’

Counsel’s reason for objecting to the three day extension.

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Dorothy O’Connell, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

David R. Smith, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-0198-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Upon Plaintiff's filing of a Motion (nunc pro tunc) for Enlargement of Time to File

a Reply in Support of Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions Against Defendants' Counsel (Doc. 56),

and for good cause, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING an enlargement of time to Plaintiff to file

the Reply in Support of Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions Against Defendants' Counsel, nunc pro

tunc, to July 5, 2007.1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Reply filed on July 5, 2007 is accepted

as timely filed in these proceedings.

DATED this 23rd day of July, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-00198-SMM Document 58 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 1