Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00820/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00820-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:7413(b) Clean Air Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME CASE NO. CV F 07-0820 LJO DLB

BUILDERS,

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER

Plaintiff, 

vs.

THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR Joint Statement of

POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT; et al., Undisputed facts: February 28, 2008

Defendants, Plaintiff’s Motion for

Summary Judgment

Filing Deadline: April 28, 2008

Defendant’s Combined

Motion and Opposition

Filing Deadline: June 27, 2008

Intervenor’s Combined

Motion and Opposition

Filing Deadline: July 8, 2008

Plaintiff’s Combined

Opposition and Reply

Filing Deadline: August 8, 2008

Defendants’ Reply

Filing Deadline: September 9, 2008

Intervenor’s Reply

Filing Deadline: September 17, 2008

Hearing on Cross

Motions for Summary

Judgment: Date: Oct. 30, 2008

 / Dept.: 4 (LJO)

Time: 8:15 a.m.

Case 1:07-cv-00820-LJO-DLB Document 22 Filed 12/05/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

This Court conducted a December 4, 2007 scheduling conference. Plaintiff The National

Association of Home Builders appeared by counsel Paul Weiland. Defendant The San Joaquin Valley

Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Governing Board of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air

Pollution Control District appeared by counsel Catherine Redmond and Phillip Jay. IntervenorDefendants Environmental Defense and the Sierra Club appeared by telephone by counsel Paul Cort.

Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 16(b), this Court sets a schedule for this action.

1. Consent To Magistrate Judge

The parties do not consent to the conduct of all further proceedings, including trial, before a

United States Magistrate Judge.

2. Dates for Cross Motions for Summary Judgment

The parties propose resolving the matter on cross motions for summary judgment. Accordingly,

the Court sets the following deadlines.

Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts, if any: February 28, 2008

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment Filing Deadline: April 28, 2008

Defendant’s Combined Motion and Opposition Filing Deadline: June 27, 2008

Intervenor’s Combined Motion and Opposition Filing Deadline: July 8, 2008

Plaintiff’s Combined Opposition and Reply Filing Deadline: August 8, 2008

Defendants’ Reply Filing Deadline: September 9, 2008

Intervenor’s Reply Filing Deadline: September 17, 2008

Hearing on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment: Date: Oct. 30, 2008

Dept.: 4 (LJO)

Time: 8:15 a.m.

3. Effect Of This Order

This order representsthe best estimate of the Court and parties as to the agenda most suitable to

dispose of this case. If the parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot

be met, the parties are ordered to notify the Court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be

///

///

Case 1:07-cv-00820-LJO-DLB Document 22 Filed 12/05/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

made, either by stipulation or by subsequent status conference. Stipulations extending the deadlines

contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations with

attached exhibits, where appropriate, which establish good cause for granting the relief requested.

Failure to comply with this order shall result in the imposition of sanctions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 4, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00820-LJO-DLB Document 22 Filed 12/05/07 Page 3 of 3