Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05077/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05077-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

STAY CASE SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05077 WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NAGENDRA SETTY (WA Bar No. 49329)

Admitted pro hac vice

nsetty@orrick.com

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5600

Seattle, Washington 98104

Telephone: (206) 839-4300

Facsimile: (206) 839-4301

DIANA RUTOWSKI (CA Bar No. 233878)

drutowski@orrick.com

GEORGE KANABE (CA Bar No. 284779)

gkanabe@orrick.com

ANDREW S. ONG (CA Bar No. 267889)

aong@orrick.com

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, California 94025

Telephone: (650) 614-7400

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant,

SHOPKICK, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

NOVITAZ, INC., 

Plaintiff,

v.

SHOPKICK, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:14-cv-05077 WHO

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 

6-1(B) AND ORDER TO STAY CASE 

SCHEDULE PENDING SETTLEMENT

Case 3:14-cv-05077-WHO Document 158 Filed 12/10/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

STAY CASE SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05077 WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff Novitaz, Inc. and Defendant shopkick, Inc., by 

and through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to stay, with the Court’s 

permission, all deadlines set forth in the current Case Schedule (see Dkt. No. 155). 

The parties respectfully submit that good cause exists for the requested stay as they have 

reached an agreement in principle to settle the case and are currently negotiating a final settlement 

of this matter. 

The stay shall remain in effect until December 28, 2015. If the case has not been 

resolved, the parties shall provide the Court with a joint status report and a proposed case 

schedule moving forward on December 28, 2015. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: December 9, 2015 GRAY ROBINSON, P.A.

GATTEY LAW OFFICE

By: /s/ Woodrow H. Pollack

WOODROW H. POLLACK

Attorney for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant

NOVITAZ, INC.

Dated: December 10, 2015 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

By: /s/ Diana Rutowski

DIANA RUTOWSKI

Attorney for Defendant and Counterclaimant

SHOPKICK, INC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 10, 2015 

Honorable William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-05077-WHO Document 158 Filed 12/10/15 Page 2 of 2