Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02040/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02040-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The parties did not provide the Court with a chambers copy of their Joint Case

Management Statement, which the docket reflects was electronically filed by counsel for

plaintiffs. The Court, nonetheless, has considered the filing. For future reference, all

parties are reminded of the following provision in the Court’s Standing Orders: “In all cases

that have been assigned to the Electronic Case Filing Program, the parties are required to

provide for use in chambers one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically. 

The paper copy of each such document shall be delivered no later than noon on the day

after the document is filed electronically. The paper copy shall be marked ‘Chambers

Copy’ and shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office in an envelope clearly marked with the

judge’s name, case number, and ‘E-Filing Chambers Copy.’”

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TARA BETH WALKER and GREG WALKER

JR.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS,

L.P., et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-06-2040 MMC

ORDER CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Before the Court is the Joint Case Management Conference Statement, filed June

19, 2006,1

 on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants Janssen, L.P., Janssen Pharmaceutica

Inc., and Johnson & Johnson, by which said parties request a continuance of the June 23,

2006 case management conference for approximately 120 days because they anticipate

certain of the instant claims will be transferred for inclusion in MDL No. 1596, In re Zyprexa

Case 3:06-cv-02040-MMC Document 7 Filed 06/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The instant action was filed March 17, 2006; consequently the 120-day deadline for

plaintiffs to serve defendants, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, has not yet elapsed.

2

Products Liability Litigation and are awaiting a decision as to whether others will be

transferred for inclusion in MDL 1769, In re Seroquel Products Liability Litigation, and

because three defendants remain to be served.2

Accordingly, for good cause shown, the June 23, 2006 case management

conference is hereby CONTINUED to October 20, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. A joint case

management statement shall be filed no later than October 13, 2006. The deadline to

serve defendants, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, remains

in effect. All parties shall timely provide a chambers copy of each document electronically

filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 22, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-02040-MMC Document 7 Filed 06/22/06 Page 2 of 2