Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07007/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07007-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 15:25 Clayton Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DATAPLEX, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR, CORPORATION,

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

GREG PRIOETTE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, 

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

ALEXANDER MA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 06-6491 CW

ORDER DENYING

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS

TO CONSIDER WHETHER

CASES SHOULD BE

RELATED

No. C 06-6501 WHA

No. 06-6511 EDL

Case 4:06-cv-07007-CW Document 3 Filed 12/14/06 Page 1 of 5
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

RECLAIM CENTER, INC., ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

YONI RIBO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, 

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

ARTHUR MADSEN, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

JAMIE MAITES, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

No. 06-6533 SI

No. 06-6535 WHA

No. 06-6541 SI

No. 06-6542 SBA

Case 4:06-cv-07007-CW Document 3 Filed 12/14/06 Page 2 of 5
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

WESTELL TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

DAVID TAKEDA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,

ET AL., 

Defendants. /

KAROL JUSKIEWICZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

CHIP TECH, LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

No. 06-6652 JL

No. 06-6663 MEJ

No. 06-6668 MJJ

No. 06-6698 JSW

Case 4:06-cv-07007-CW Document 3 Filed 12/14/06 Page 3 of 5
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 4

MICHAEL FRANCIS AYERS, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

DON THOMPSON, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,

ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

STARGATE FILMS INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

MICHAEL KATZ, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

No. 06-6770 SBA

No. 06-7006 SI

No. 06-7007 CW

No. 06-7194 MEJ

Case 4:06-cv-07007-CW Document 3 Filed 12/14/06 Page 4 of 5
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The Court notes that there is a motion to consider relating

some of these cases to an earlier numbered case, In re DRAM

Antitrust Litigation, No. 02-1486 PJH), which Judge Hamilton denied

without prejudice due to the pending proceedings before the

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. 

5

The Court has before it five motions to consider whether cases

should be related. The Court has also received a notice from the

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation that a motion to

transfer has been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 (MDL No. 1819,

In re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation). 

Because resolution of the motion to transfer may moot the motions

before this Court, the Court DENIES the motions to consider

relating without prejudice to renewal following the resolution of

the proceedings before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation (Docket Nos. 4, 7, 16, 26, 28).1 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 12/ 14/06 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-07007-CW Document 3 Filed 12/14/06 Page 5 of 5