Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01058/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01058-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND AND SUBMIT MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,

SHEPPARD, WAYTE &

CARRUTH LLP

7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET

FRESNO, CA 93720

Douglas R. Dollinger, Esq., appearing Pro Hoc Vice 

Bar No. N.Y. 2354926 

50 Main Street-Suite 1000

White Plains, New York 10606

Tel. 845.915.6800

Facs. 845.915.6801

E-mail: ddollingeresq@gmail.com

Seth D. Heyman, Esq., CA Bar No. 194120

2600 Michelson Drive, Suite 900

Irvine, CA 92612

Tel: 855-439-6628

Fax: 855-207-3967

Email: sdh@heymanlegal.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

ST. VENTURES a Utah Corporation; 

WORLDWIDE INVESTMENT, INC.,

a California Corporation;

Plaintiffs,

 v.

BEN M. PENFIELD, an individual; 

JETHALYN N. PENFIELD an individual; 

A.J. AJ BERRONES, an individual; FRANK 

WILDE, an individual, MAUREEN WILDE 

each as the RICO Person Defendants,

 and

KBA ASSETS AND ACQUISITIONS, LLC 

VIEWPOINT SECURITIES, UBS 

FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., ROYAL 

BANK OF CANADA, DEPOSITORY 

TRUST AND CLEARING COMPANY 

BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN & CO., 

FALCON PRIVATE BANK OF ZURICH, 

SETH LAYTON, JOHN DOE(s) and JANE 

ROE(s) 1 through 10, as the KBA Enterprise 

Entities, KBA Members, Defendants in 

Possession of Converted Assets, Aiders and 

Abettors, and Otherwise Defendants in 

Negligence,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:12-cv-01058-LJO-SMS

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATIONTOEXTEND TIME

TO THE RESPOND TO BROWN BROTHERS 

HARRIMAN & CO’s MOTION TO DISMISS/STRIKE 

THE COMPLAINT AND SETTING DEADLINE 

FOR FILING OFMOTION TO ENLARGE TIME 

OF SERVICE

[Local Rules 144(a) & 230(f)]

Case 1:12-cv-01058-LJO-SMS Document 103 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND AN SUBMIT MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT

Law Offices Of

Douglas R. Dollinger P.C.

ORDER

In light of the foregoing stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that the time within which 

Plaintiffs shall respond to the Motion of BBH to Dismiss or Strike or For a More Defeinative 

Statement of the First Amended Verified Complaint, shall be extended up to and including 

December 1, 2014, that Plaintiff shall submit the Motion of Enlargement to perfect personal servce 

on all nonappearing Defendnants shall be submitted on ot before November 12, 2014 and that the 

hearing on BBH’s Motion shalll be set for December 18, 2014 .

The Parties are warned that, absent extraordinary circumstances, further requests for 

extensions, even if by stipulation, will be rejected if not submitted prior to the expiration of the 

relevant deadline. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 10, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01058-LJO-SMS Document 103 Filed 11/12/14 Page 2 of 2