Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01904/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01904-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Pacific Telesis Group Comprehensive 

Disability hfits Plan, ct al. 

CASE NO. C 07 1904 WDB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil LR 16-8 and ADR L.R 3-5: 

The parties agree toparticipate in the following ADRprocess: 

Court Processes: 

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R 4) 

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADRL.R 5) 

Mediation (ADR L.R 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that m early settlement conference with a Ma@trate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their nee& than any otherform ofADR, mustparticipate in an 

ADR phone conference and may notJile this form. They must insteadfile a Notice ofNeed for 

ADR Phone Cogerenee. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 dADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process: 

Private ADR @lease identiJfy process andprovider) Mediation 

Vivien Williamson 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

J the presumptive deadline (17re deadline is 90 daysfrom the date of the order 

refwring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) 

Dated: 7- &*C 

ttomeyfor Plaintiff 

4- Attorney for Defendants 

Case 3:07-cv-01904-JSW Document 13 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 2 Case 3:07-cv-01904-JSW Document 15 Filed 07/24/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:07-cv-01904-JSW Document 13 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 2 of 2

July 24, 2007