Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02606/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02606-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMMY R. HARPER,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-2606 KJN P

ORDER AND FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed January 6, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 

to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and 

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign 

a district judge to this case; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 

110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

Case 2:15-cv-02606-TLN-KJN Document 6 Filed 02/18/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: February 18, 2016

/harp2606.fta

Case 2:15-cv-02606-TLN-KJN Document 6 Filed 02/18/16 Page 2 of 2