Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04214/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04214-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LESLI BURCH,

Plaintiff,

 v.

GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-09-4214 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF

DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On January 22, 2010, plaintiff electronically filed opposition to defendant Paul

Financial, LLC’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on

the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy

of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly

marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See

General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if she fails in the future to comply with General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each

Case 3:09-cv-04214-MMC Document 32 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

electronically-filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-04214-MMC Document 32 Filed 02/04/10 Page 2 of 2