Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01728/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01728-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

MILLER, KAPLAN, ARASE & CO, LLP,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-01728-MMC 

ORDER DENYING DEFERRED 

PORTION OF PLAINTIFF'S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; 

DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF

Re: Dkt. No. 108

By order filed June 24, 2016, the Court deferred in part ruling on plaintiff's 

"Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Confidential Exhibits," filed June 3, 2016, to the 

extent the motion sought leave to file under seal Exhibits 14, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28 to 

the Declaration of Drew Robinson. As those seven exhibits had been designated as 

confidential by non-party SanDisk Corporation ("SanDisk"), and the administrative motion 

had not been served on SanDisk, the Court directed plaintiff to serve the administrative 

motion on SanDisk, which plaintiff subsequently did.

Now before the Court is SanDisk's Statement, filed July 1, 2016, in which SanDisk 

states it "does not object to the public filing" of the seven exhibits identified in the 

administrative motion. (See SanDisk's Statement at 1:7-8.)

Accordingly, the deferred portion of plaintiff's administrative motion is hereby 

DENIED, and plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to file said seven exhibits in the public record, 

"no earlier than 4 days, and no later than 10 days, after the motion is denied.” See Civil 

L.R. 79-5(e)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 18, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01728-MMC Document 136 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 1