Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02459/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02459-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP. RE RESPONSE TO DEF. MOT. TO DISMISS

C 06-02459 CRB 1

MARC VAN DER HOUT, CA SBN # 80778

STACY TOLCHIN, CA SBN # 217431

Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, LLP

180 Sutter Street, Fifth Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 981-3000

Facsimile: (415) 981-3003

Email: ndca@vblaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RAJ SINGH KOHLI and

VEENA KAUR KOHLI

Plaintffs,

v.

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, et. al.

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-02459 CRB

JOINT STIPULATION TO VACATE

HEARING ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR

PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS'

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case 3:06-cv-02459-CRB Document 20 Filed 01/10/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP. RE RESPONSE TO DEF. MOT. TO DISMISS

C 06-02459 CRB 2

On April 7, 2006, Plaintiffs filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court, seeking an

order that the Court compel the adjudication of the I-730 Petition for Asylee Relative filed by

Plaintiff Veena Kaur Kohli on behalf of Plaintiff Raj Singh Kohli.

On June 15, 2006, the parties filed a stipulation to continue the case management conference

based on the belief that Plaintiffs’ case may be resolved in the near future. On September 27,

2006, the parties filed a second stipulation for the same reason. 

On December 1, 2006, the parties filed a Case Management Statement proposing that Plaintiffs

would file a motion for summary judgment on December 15, 2006, Defendants would file their

Response on December 29, 2006, and Plaintiffs would file their reply on January 5, 2007. The

parties agreed to a hearing on the motion for summary judgment on January 19, 2007, at 10:00

a.m.

Plaintiffs filed their motion for summary judgment on December 15, 2006, and on January 5,

2007, in lieu of a Response to that Motion, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss as moot because

the petition at issue in the mandamus case had been adjudicated on December 28, 2006. 

The parties agree that Plaintiffs’ reply due on January 5, 2007 is now no longer appropriate

given that Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss. The parties further agree that the hearing on

the motion for summary judgment currently set for January 19, 2007 is also no longer necessary

given that Defendants adjudicated the application and Plaintiffs have obtained the relief they

sought, and thus request that the Court vacate that hearing date. 

The parties further agree that Plaintiffs will file a response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss on

or before Friday January 12, 2007.

//

 //

//

Case 3:06-cv-02459-CRB Document 20 Filed 01/10/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

I, Stacy Tolchin attest that Edward Olsen, or his representative, has consented to the

filing of this joint case management statement.

JOINT STIP. RE RESPONSE TO DEF. MOT. TO DISMISS

C 06-02459 CRB 3

DATED: January 5, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

_____________/s/___________________

EDWARD A. OLSEN1

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Respondents

DATED: January 5, 2007 _________/s/_______________________

STACY TOLCHIN

Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, LLP

Attorneys for Petitioner

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: __________________________

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

Janaury 9, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-02459-CRB Document 20 Filed 01/10/07 Page 3 of 3