Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01223/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01223-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WALTER JOHNSON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1223 DFL DAD P

vs.

M.L. EVANS,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

On March 3, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued an order granting petitioner’s

request to proceed in forma pauperis, directing respondent to file a response to petitioner’s

habeas petition, and denying petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel, motion for relief

from judgment, and motion styled, “Motion For Supplement and/or Used In Conjunction with

Red. Rule 60(b)(1)(2)(3)(4)(6) and State Bar Review Dept.” On April 19, 2006, petitioner filed a

request for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 72-303(b), states “rulings by Magistrate

Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within ten court days .

. . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties.” E.D. Local Rule 72-303(b). Petitioner’s

request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order of March 3, 2006, is therefore

untimely.

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01223-JAM-DAD Document 16 Filed 05/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s April 19, 2006 request

for reconsideration is denied.

DATED: 5/18/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01223-JAM-DAD Document 16 Filed 05/19/06 Page 2 of 2