Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06883/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06883-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREA MUCHIN and PAUL GIBB,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

MYLAN N.V., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 16-06883 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO

HAC VICE APPLICATION

OF ATTORNEYS ADAM K.

LEVIN, MITCHELL E. ZAMOFF,

AND DAVID M. FOSTER

The pro hac vice application of Attorneys Adam L. Levin, Mitchell E. Zamoff, and

David M. Foster (Dkt. Nos. 16–18) are DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The

local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he or she is an active member in good standing

of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of

Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the

district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as “the bar

of the District of Columbia” — is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a

specific court. While the application fees do not need to be paid again, the applications cannot

be processed until corrected forms are submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 9, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-06883-WHA Document 20 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 1