Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00757/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00757-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERICK NORWOOD, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

JAMES YATES, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-CV-0757 AWI SMS HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING

MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DISMISSING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

(Documents #12 & #13)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On December 8, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended Respondent’s motion to dismiss be GRANTED and the petition for writ of habeas

corpus be DISMISSED for violating the one year statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d). This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the

date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:05-cv-00757-AWI -SMS Document 14 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued December 8, 2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED; 

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 14, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00757-AWI -SMS Document 14 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2