Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01510/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01510-66/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

FURTHER QUESTIONS

FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

Please be prepared on the following additional questions at oral argument:

7. Does §17200 require a “practice,” i.e., is a single failure to hold a vote sufficient?

8. Plaintiffs claim that the disclosures held out the fund as akin to a money market

fund but with a greater yield, i.e., almost no risk of losing principal. Some or all of

the disclosures, however, stated that the fund would invest in MBS. Isn’t there a

jury question whether the MBS disclosure was adequate in light of the main theme

of akin to a money market fund?

9. The bench set of disclosures should also tab and highlight with a different color

from the MBS ones all passages said by plaintiffs to be misleading in the stack of

key documents.

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 519 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

10. If some of these questions are outside the pending briefing, please say so.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 24, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 519 Filed 03/24/10 Page 2 of 2