Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02660/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02660-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCSSF1:875440.1 STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DATE TO

SUBMIT OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED WITNESSES &

EXHIBITS & RESPONSES THERETO (C 04-02660 JW) 

Counsel listed on next page 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

DAVID HALTERMAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

LEGATO SOFTWARE, a Division of EMC 

Corporation; EMC CORPORATION, dba 

EMC PERIPHERALS, INC., and DOES 1-X, 

Defendants.

Case No. C 04-02660 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING DUE DATE 

FOR PARTIES TO SUBMIT 

OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED 

WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS AND 

RESPONSES THERETO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:04-cv-02660-JW Document 248 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCSSF1:875440.1 - 2 - STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DATE TO

SUBMIT OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED WITNESSES &

EXHIBITS & RESPONSES THERETO (C 04-02660 JW) 

KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON (State Bar No. 70636) 

DICKSON – ROSS LLP 

1970 Broadway, Suite 1045 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 268-1999 

Facsimile: (510) 268-3627 

DAVID ANGLE (admitted Pro Hac Vice)

ANGLE & ANGLE LLC 

1881 9th Street, Suite 315 

Boulder, Colorado 80302 

Telephone: (303) 443-2200 

Facsimile: (303) 443-2229 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

David Halterman 

GARY R. SINISCALCO (State Bar No. 64770) 

MICHAEL D. WEIL (State Bar No. 209056) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

The Orrick Building 

405 Howard Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2669 

Telephone: 415-773-5700 

Facsimile: 415-773-5759 

LYNNE C. HERMLE (State Bar No. 99779) 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, California 94025-1021 

Telephone: 650-614-7400 

Facsimile: 650-614-7401 

LEANNE FITZGERALD (admitted Pro Hac Vice)

EMC CORPORATION 

2350 West El Camino Real 

Mountain View, CA 94040 

Attorneys for Defendant 

EMC Corporation 

Case 5:04-cv-02660-JW Document 248 Filed 03/30/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCSSF1:875440.1 STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DATE TO

SUBMIT OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED WITNESSES &

EXHIBITS & RESPONSES THERETO (C 04-02660 JW) 

Plaintiff David Halterman, on the one hand, and defendant EMC Corporation, on the other 

hand, through their respective counsel and pursuant to paragraph 2 of the Court’s November 29, 

2005 Order Following Preliminary Pretrial Conference (“Order”), HEREBY STIPULATE and 

AGREE as follows: 

1. Plaintiff and defendant exchanged lists of proposed trial witnesses and exhibits on 

March 16, 2006. 

2. The parties proposed over 150 exhibits, each. In addition, the parties have 

proposed approximately 20 witnesses, combined. 

3. Plaintiff and defendant met and conferred for over 5 hours, including on March 22, 

and 27, 2006, in an effort to resolve disputes concerning the proposed trial witnesses and exhibits. 

4. The parties are continuing to negotiate in good faith regarding the proposed 

witnesses and exhibits. In addition, the parties expect to lodge numerous objections to exhibits 

and witnesses.

5. The Court’s November 29, 2005 Pre-Trial Order provides that the parties’ 

respective motions in limine, objections to proposed witnesses and exhibits, and responses 

thereto, are due on March 31, 2006. The parties require additional time to complete their meet 

and confer efforts, to adequately brief the Court regarding disputes the parties are unable to 

resolve regarding proposed exhibits and witnesses and to adequately brief the Court regarding the 

parties’ respective motions in limine. 

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 5:04-cv-02660-JW Document 248 Filed 03/30/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCSSF1:875440.1 - 2 - STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DATE TO

SUBMIT OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED WITNESSES &

EXHIBITS & RESPONSES THERETO (C 04-02660 JW) 

6. Therefore, plaintiff and defendant respectfully request that the Court continue the 

due date for the parties’ respective objections to receipt into evidence of witnesses or exhibits, 

and responses thereto, from March 31, 2006 to April 7, 2006. The due date for the parties’ 

respective motions in limine and joint pre-trial conference statement shall remain March 31, 

2006.

7. The concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Kathryn 

Burkett Dickson, Attorney for Plaintiff, David Halterman. 

SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: March 28, 2006 

KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON 

DICKSON – ROSS LLP 

DAVID ANGLE 

ANGLE & ANGLE LLC 

By: /s/ 

Kathryn Burkett Dickson 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

David Halterman 

Dated: March 28, 2006 

GARY R. SINISCALCO 

LYNNE C. HERMLE 

MICHAEL D. WEIL 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

LEANNE FITZGERALD 

EMC CORPORATION 

By: /s/ 

Michael D. Weil 

Attorneys for Defendant 

EMC Corporation 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________ 

James Ware 

United States District Judge 

March 30, 2006

Case 5:04-cv-02660-JW Document 248 Filed 03/30/06 Page 4 of 4