Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03502/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03502-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1 

ORDER RE DISCOVERY 

2178374.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Brian H. Gunn (SBN 192594) 

bhgunn@wolfewyman.com 

Andrew A. Bao (SBN 247092) 

aabao@wolfewyman.com 

WOLFE & WYMAN LLP

2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 645 

Walnut Creek, California 94596-3502 

Telephone: (925) 280-0004 

Facsimile: (925) 280-0005 

Attorneys for Defendant 

S2VERIFY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

REGMON L. HAWKINS, on behalf of himself and 

all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

S2VERIFY, a foreign limited liability company, 

 Defendant. 

 Case No.: 3:15-cv-03502 WHA 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY 

Date: December 14, 2015 

Time: 11:00 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor 

Hon. William H. Alsup 

Trial Date: None set. 

Action Filed: 06/16/2015 

A hearing on Plaintiff REGMON L. HAWKIN (“Plaintiff”)’s discovery issues set forth in a 

December 7, 2015 letter (Docket Doc No. 50) was heard before this Court on December 14, 2015. 

Michael Caddell appeared on behalf of Plaintiff, and Andrew A. Bao appeared on behalf of 

Defendant S2VERIFY (“S2V”). 

Having considered the moving and opposing papers, oral arguments, and being fully advised, 

the Court hereby orders as follows: 

The deposition of Defendant S2V Pursuant to FRCP 30(B)(1) will take place on Monday, 

December 21, 2015, at 9:00 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, 260 Peachtree Street NW, Suite 2200, 

Case 3:15-cv-03502-WHA Document 57 Filed 12/16/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

ORDER RE DISCOVERY 

2178374.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Atlanta, Georgia, 30303. The deposition is limited to 7 hours. This deposition date can be moved 

only upon an agreement in writing between Caddell & Chapman and Wolfe & Wyman LLP. 

For the reasons set forth on the record, the Court is ordering Defendant S2V to produce all 

consumer reports responsive to Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents, Set One, Requests 

7-10, as set forth in Plaintiff’s December 7, 2015 letter (Docket Doc No. 50). The Court is cognizant 

that S2V cannot produce private information of third parties absent a permissible purpose due to the 

provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, codified as 15 U.S.C. §1681 et seq. (“FCRA”). In 

issuing this order, the Court provides S2V with the “permissible purpose” requirements under 15 

U.S.C. §1681b(a)(1). All responsive documents subject to this paragraph shall be produced before 

the deposition referenced in the preceding paragraph is taken, or Plaintiff will have the opportunity 

to conduct a second deposition of that deponent following production of the responsive documents. 

Defendant S2V’s counsel is to invoice Plaintiff’s counsel of record for one-half of the 

reasonable costs of production of these documents. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _________________ ____________________________________ 

 WILLIAM H. ALSUP 

 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

December 16, 2015.

Case 3:15-cv-03502-WHA Document 57 Filed 12/16/15 Page 2 of 2