Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03816/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03816-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CRAIGSLIST, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

3TAPS, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. 3:12-cv-03816-CRB

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Craigslist (“Craigslist”) has filed a motion for default judgment against

Defendant Niessen (“Niessen”). See Motion for Default Judgment (dkt. 277). The Clerk of

Court entered a notice of default against Niessen after he failed to respond to the Amended

Complaint. See Clerk’s Notice of Default (dkt. 276); see also Amended Complaint

(“Complaint”) (dkt. 35). The Court has reviewed Craigslist’s motion and has given the

Defendant an opportunity to respond in writing and to appear at a hearing on October 9,

2015. See Minute Entry (dkt. 277). Defendant has not responded or appeared. For the

reasons outlined below, the Court GRANTS Craigslist’s motion for default judgment.

I. Factual Background

This section accepts as true the well-pled factual allegations in the complaint

regarding liability. See Fair Hous. of Marin v. Combs, 285 F.3d 899, 906 (9th Cir. 2002). 

Case 3:12-cv-03816-CRB Document 280 Filed 10/11/15 Page 1 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 The Court entered an order enjoining 3taps from similarly violating Craigslist’s Terms

of Use, among other things, on June 30, 2015. See Permanent Injunction (dkt. 272).

2

A. Craigslist and its Terms of Use

Craigslist is a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business and

headquarters in San Francisco, California. Compl. ¶¶ 17, 26. It maintains one of the world’s

most popular websites, offering a platform for millions of authorized users to seek

employment, search for housing, and trade goods and services. Compl. ¶ 25. Craigslist’s

Terms of Use (“TOU”) grant users a limited revocable license to access and use Craigslist’s

website in accordance with its terms. Compl. ¶ 42; see also Declaration of William C.

Powell (dkt. 279) (“Powell Decl.”) ¶¶ 4-6, Exs. E-G. The TOU prohibit, among other things,

“[a]ny copying, aggregation, display, distribution, performance or derivative use of craigslist

or any content posted on craigslist whether done directly or through intermediaries,” except

in narrow circumstances applicable to general purpose search engines. See Powell Decl. ¶ 4,

Ex. E; Compl. ¶ 44. Craigslist users are required to accept the site’s TOU before posting

content to it. Compl. ¶ 36. If a user chooses not to accept the TOU, then the user will not be

allowed to post. Id. ¶ 37.

B. Niessen “Scrapes” Craigslist in Violation of the TOU

According to the complaint, Niessen is a self-described “hacker” who remotely

accesses and extracts content from websites—including Craigslist—using a process called

“scraping.” See Barry Decl. ¶ 3, Ex. B; see also Compl. ¶ 75. Niessen began a relationship

with Defendant 3taps1

 on April 30, 2010. See Barry Decl. ¶ 3, Ex. B. He responded to a

Craigslist post seeking a “Skilled Hacker at Scraping Web Content” and stated that he was

already scraping “over 7,500 sites like [c]raigslist, Twitter, Groupon, Zagat, and others.” See

id. 3taps commissioned Niessen to identify, source, copy, and redistribute Craigslist content,

without authorization, for profit. See Barry Decl. ¶ 4, Ex. C. According to Megumi

Nakamura, 3taps’ Chief Operating Officer, Niessen “was already [scraping] sites like

craigslist and a bunch of others . . . . And so, to the extent that [Niessen] was already doing

this, 3taps was just a new place where he would send the data.” Barry Decl. ¶ 5, Ex. D. 

Case 3:12-cv-03816-CRB Document 280 Filed 10/11/15 Page 2 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Craigslist alleges that this scraping and distribution of its content is unlawful, violated its

TOU, and has “damaged craigslist, and caused and continue[] to cause irreparable . . . harm

and injury to craigslist.” Compl. ¶ 139. Niessen has posted to Craigslist’s website at least 37

times, verifying that he has acknowledged and agreed to be bound by Craigslist’s TOU on at

least 37 separate occasions. Powell Decl. ¶ 2; Barry Decl. ¶ 6; Compl. ¶ 130-31. 

C. Procedural History 

On November 20, 2012, Craigslist filed its Amended Complaint against Niessen and

several additional defendants. See Complaint (dkt. 35). Craigslist alleged, among other

things, that Niessen was liable for breach of contract for “willfully, repeatedly, and

systematically” violating the TOU in his use of the Craigslist website. Id. ¶¶ 131, 137. 

Craigslist requested that the Court enjoin Niessen from violating its TOU and scraping its

website. Id. ¶ 141. On July 3, 2014, Craigslist located Niessen and served him with the

Complaint. See Certificate of Service (dkt. 274). 

This court has entered Orders of Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction against

Niessen’s codefendants. See Lovely Order (dkt. 224); PadMapper Order (dkt. 271); 3taps

Order (272). Niessen is the only defendant who has not yet been permanently enjoined in

this matter. See Motion for Default Judgment (dkt. 277) at 2. On August 7, 2015, the Clerk

of Court entered a notice of default against Niessen after he failed to respond to the

Complaint within the time set by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. See Clerk’s Notice of

Default (dkt. 276). Craigslist now requests the entry of default judgment against Niessen,

permanently enjoining him from violating the Craigslist TOU. See Motion for Default

Judgment (dkt. 277) at 2.

II. Legal Standard

The Court may enter a default judgment upon motion by the Plaintiff after entry of

default by the Clerk. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Whether to grant a motion for the entry of a

default judgment is within the discretion of the trial court. See Lau Ah Yew v. Dulles, 236

F.2d 415, 416 (9th Cir. 1956). Upon an entry of default by the Clerk, the factual allegations

Case 3:12-cv-03816-CRB Document 280 Filed 10/11/15 Page 3 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

of the plaintiff’s complaint will be taken as true, except those relating to the amount of

damages. See Derek Andrew, Inc. v. Poof Apparel Corp., 528 F.3d 696, 702 (9th Cir. 2008).

In determining whether to enter a default judgment, a court has “an affirmative duty to

look into its jurisdiction over both the subject matter and the parties.” In re Tuli, 172 F.3d

707, 712 (9th Cir. 1999). The Court has found subject matter jurisdiction over this matter in

its prior orders, and regarding Niessen, Craigslist alleges that its TOU provides for

jurisdiction in this Court and that Niessen made “systematic and continuous contacts with

this judicial district” by accessing Craigslist’s servers and targeted his “wrongful acts at

craigslist, which is headquartered in this judicial district.” Compl. ¶ 14-15. This Court thus

has “jurisdiction over both the subject matter and the parties.” Tuli, 172 F.3d at 712 ; see

also Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 2004).

III. Discussion

A. The Eitel Factors 

This Court examines the following factors in determining whether to enter a default

judgment: (1) the possibility of prejudice to the plaintiff; (2) the merits of the plaintiff’s

substantive claims; (3) the sufficiency of the complaint; (4) the sum of money at stake in the

action; (5) the possibility of a dispute concerning material facts; (6) whether the default was

due to excusable neglect; and (7) the likelihood of obtaining a decision on the merits. Eitel v.

McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986). Here, these factors all weigh in favor of

granting the injunctive relief requested by Craigslist. 

Under the first factor, Craigslist would be prejudiced if the court does not enter default

judgment against Niessen. See id. Absent the requested injunction, Craigslist would be left

without any means to enforce its TOU or protect the content of its website from Niessen’s

alleged misappropriation. See Am. Auto. Ass'n, Inc. v. AAA Auto Body & Repair, Inc., No.

C14-04131 CRB, 2015 WL 1089746, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2015). 

The second and third factors focus on the merits of Plaintiffs' substantive claim and

the sufficiency of the Complaint. See Eitel, 782 F.2d at 1471–72. To state a claim for breach

of contract, Craigslist must allege that: (1) a contract exists; (2) it performed its own duties

Case 3:12-cv-03816-CRB Document 280 Filed 10/11/15 Page 4 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

thereunder; (3) Niessen breached; and (4) Craigslist suffered damages as a result of the

breach. Troyk v. Famers Grp., Inc., 171 Cal. App. 4th 1305, 1352 (2009). Here, Craigslist

alleges that the TOU constitute a contract to which Niessen assented. Compl. ¶¶ 130-31. 

Craigslist further alleges that it has performed its own duties imposed pursuant to the TOU. 

Compl. ¶ 138. Finally, Craiglist alleges that Niessen willfully, repeatedly and systematically

breached the TOU, and that this breach of the TOU damaged Craigslist. Id. ¶¶ 137, 139. 

Craigslist thus adequately pleads a breach of contract claim against Niessen and satisfies the

second and third factors under Eitel. See 782 F.2d at 1471–72.

The fourth factor examines the sum of money at stake in the action. Eitel, 782 F.2d at

1471-72. Courts have held that where a plaintiff seeks only injunctive relief, this factor

weighs in favor of granting default judgment. See United States v. Broaster Kitchen, Inc.,

No. CV 14-09421, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88403, at *17 (C.D. Cal. May 27, 2015); United

States v. Torres, No. 2:12-cv-10530, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185079, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Apr.

17, 2013). Craigslist solely requests and injunction here, so this factor also weighs in favor

of granting default judgment for Craigslist. See Motion for Default Judgment (dkt. 277) at 6. 

Turning to remaining factors, there is no possibility of dispute over material facts

because, upon an entry of default by the Clerk, the factual allegations of the plaintiff’s

complaint related to liability will be taken as true. See Derek Andrew, Inc. v. Poof Apparel

Corp., 528 F.3d 696, 702 (9th Cir. 2008); Eitel, 782 F.2d at 1471-72. Furthermore, there is

no evidence of excusable neglect by Niessen, given that he was properly served with the

Complaint over a year ago. See Certificate of Service (dkt. 274); Eitel, 782 F.2d at 1471-72. 

Finally, although default judgments are generally disfavored because cases should ordinarily

be decided on the merits, see Pena v. Seguros La Comercial, S.A., 770 F.2d 811, 814 (9th

Cir. 1985), Niessen’s failure to appear has made a decision on the merits impossible. See

Eitel, 782 F.2d at 1471-72. Each of the Eitel factors thus weighs in favor of default

judgment. 

Case 3:12-cv-03816-CRB Document 280 Filed 10/11/15 Page 5 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

B. Injunctive Relief

Given that default judgment is warranted in this case, the Court must next determine

the appropriate relief. Craiglist requests permanent injunctive relief to prohibit Niessen from

violating its TOU and misusing Craigslist web content. See Motion for Default Judgment

(dkt. 277) at 9. Injunctive relief is appropriate when a party demonstrates “(1) that it has

suffered an irreparable injury; (2) that remedies available at law . . . are inadequate to

compensate for that injury; (3) that, considering the balance of hardships between the

plaintiff and defendant, a remedy in equity is warranted; and (4) that the public interest

would not be disserved by a permanent injunction.” N. Cheyenne Tribe v. Norton, 503 F.3d

836, 843 (9th Cir. 2007). 

Here, Craigslist has alleged irreparable injury from Niessen’s “scraping”activities. 

See Compl. ¶ 139. Craigslist also argues that the clandestine nature of scraping, see Compl.

¶ 75, makes the extent of this injury difficult to calculate and translate into monetary

damages, rendering remedies available at law inadequate. See Norton, 503 F.3d at 843. 

Regarding the balance of hardships, Craigslist asserts that it only requests compliance with

its TOU, and thus imposes no hardship on Niessen. See id. Finally, Craigslist asserts that

the public interest is not served by Niessen’s breach of its TOU. See id. The Court thus

concludes that injunctive relief is appropriate in this case.

IV. Conclusion

The Court GRANTS the Motion for Default Judgment and ORDERS that: 

1. Judgment is hereby entered against Niessen based on Craigslist’s claim for

breach of contract. 

2. Niessen and all of his employees, representatives, agents, and all other persons

or entities acting in concert with him are hereby permanently and immediately

enjoined from: (a) copying, reproducing, distributing, preparing derivative

works from, distributing copies to the public, and/or publicly displaying the

user-generated postings on craigslist’s website; (b) knowingly and

systematically inducing, causing, and/or materially contributing to the

Case 3:12-cv-03816-CRB Document 280 Filed 10/11/15 Page 6 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7

unauthorized copying, reproduction, preparation of derivative works from,

distribution of copies to the public, and/or public displaying the user-generated

postings on craigslist’s website; and (c) accessing or using craigslist’s website

for any commercial purpose that violates Craiglist’s Terms of Use.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 9, 2015 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:12-cv-03816-CRB Document 280 Filed 10/11/15 Page 7 of 7