Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02821/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02821-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1319 Clean Water Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Extend Page Limits; [Proposed] Order Granting Excess Page Limits

Case No. C 01-2821 MHP 1

MICHAEL R. LOZEAU (CA Bar No. 142893)

1516 Oak Street, Suite 216

Alameda, California 94501

Tel: (510) 749-9102

Fax: (510) 749-9103

E-mail: mrlozeau@lozeaulaw.com

SHARON E. DUGGAN (CA Bar No. 105108)

370 Grand Avenue, Suite 5

Oakland, California 94610

Tel: (510) 271-0825

Fax: (510) 271-0829

E-mail: foxsduggan@aol.com

DEBORAH SIVAS (CA Bar No. 135446)

Holly D. Gordon (CA Bar No. 226888)

STANFORD LAW SCHOOL

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CLINIC

559 Nathan Abbott Way

Stanford, California 94305-8620

Tel: (650) 723-0325

Fax: (650) 725-8509

E-mail: dsivas@stanford.edu

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Environmental Protection Information Center

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

INFORMATION CENTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

PACIFIC LUMBER COMPANY; SCOTIA PACIFIC

COMPANY, LLC, and; UNITED STATES

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,

Defendants.

__________________________________________/

Case No.: C01-2821 MHP

STIPULATION TO EXTEND

PAGE LIMITS ON SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MEMORANDA;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

AUTHORIZING FILING OF

MEMORANDA IN EXCESS OF

25 PAGES 

DATE: August 21, 2006

TIME: 2:00 p.m.

Case 3:01-cv-02821-MHP Document 282 Filed 07/06/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Extend Page Limits; [Proposed] Order Granting Excess Page Limits

Case No. C 01-2821 MHP 2

COURTROOM: 15

WHEREAS the parties to this action may file cross motions for summary judgment by no

later than June 30, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the Local Rule 7.2 for the Northern District of California limits the length of

a supporting and opposition memoranda to 25 pages;

WHEREAS, due to the extensive evidence and review necessary, the Plaintiff,

Environmental Protection Information Center (“EPIC”) requires more than 25 pages to present

their factual and legal arguments in its opening memoranda in support of its motion for summary

judgment; and

WHEREAS the Plaintiff EPIC has worked diligently to confine its memorandum to as few

pages as necessary; 

WHEREAS, the Defendant Pacific Lumber believes it will need in excess of 25 pages

when it files an opposition to Plaintiff EPIC’s motion for summary judgment. 

THE PARTIES THEREFORE STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. EPIC and Pacific Lumber each agree that EPIC may file an opening memoranda in

support of its motion for summary judgment in excess of 25 pages, and not to exceed 45 pages; 

2. EPIC and Pacific Lumber also agree that Pacific Lumber may file a memorandum

in opposition to EPIC’s motion for summary judgment in excess of 25 pages, and not to exceed 45

pages, should it be necessary. 

3. EPIC and Pacific Lumber agree to respectfully request that the Court allow the

Plaintiff EPIC and Defendant Pacific Lumber to file their respective memoranda in support and in

Case 3:01-cv-02821-MHP Document 282 Filed 07/06/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Extend Page Limits; [Proposed] Order Granting Excess Page Limits

Case No. C 01-2821 MHP 3

opposition to EPIC’s motion for summary judgment in excess of 25 pages and not to exceed 45

pages. 

DATED: June 30, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Michael R. Lozeau

Michael R. Lozeau

Attorney for Plaintiff EPIC 

DATED: June 30, 2006 /s/ Shaye Diveley 

Shaye Diveley

Morrison & Foerster

Attorneys for Defendants Pacific Lumber

THE PARTIES HAVING STIPULATED, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS

SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________ ___________________________________ 

The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

July 5, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:01-cv-02821-MHP Document 282 Filed 07/06/06 Page 3 of 3