Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-00072/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-00072-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Phillip Seldon,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Edward Magedson a/k/a Ed Magedson; et 

al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-13-0072 PHX DGC

ORDER 

 On January 1, 2013, Plaintiff filed a complaint with this Court. Doc. 1. On 

February 4, 2013, Plaintiff served a complaint on Defendant Xcentric Ventures. Doc. 5. 

Defendant thereupon filed a motion to quash service of process. Doc. 6. In its motion, 

Defendant argued that the served complaint was different from the filed complaint. Id. 

Specifically, the served complaint included a request for a jury trial, while the filed 

complaint did not, and the paragraph numbering for the complaints was different. Doc. 9 

at 1. Since then, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (Doc. 11) and Defendant now 

confirms that Plaintiff appropriately served the amended complaint. See Doc. 9 at 2. 

Because Defendant has been appropriately served with the amended complaint, its 

motion to quash service of the original complaint (Doc. 6) is denied as moot. 

 Dated this 29th day of March, 2013. 

Case 2:13-cv-00072-SPL Document 12 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 1