Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-01522/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-01522-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation

---

1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

 10

 11

 12

 13

 14

 15

 16

 17

 18

 19

 20

 21

 22

 23

 24

 25

 26

 27

 28

Espinoza, et. al. v. C&C Security Patrol., et al. Page 1

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 

ADAM WANG, Bar No. 201233

LAW OFFICES OF ADAM WANG

12 South First Street, Suite 708

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone: (408) 292-1040

Facsimile: (408) 416-0248

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Mark A. Hagopian, Esq., SBN 124819, mhagopian@mmker.com

Sejal Thakkar, Esq., SBN 226778, sxt@mmker.com

MANNING & MARDER

KASS, ELLROD, RAMIREZ LLP

One California Street, Suite 1100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 217-6990

Facsimile: (415) 217-6999

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

LEONARDO ESPINOZA, and SERGIO 

ROQUE, , 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

C & C SECURITY PATROL, INC., 

HERMENEGILDO COUGH, MARCEL 

LOEPZ, GILBERT MARTINEZ, and DOES 1-

10

Defendants

Case No. C08-01522 JW

STIPULATION FOR ONE WEEK 

EXTENSION TO FILE JOINT 

PRE0TRIAL CONFERENCE 

STATEMENT, PROPOSED JURY 

INSTRUCTIONS AND MOTIONS IN 

LIMINE & [PROPOSED] ORDER

Judge: Honorable James Ware 

Trial Date: March 10, 2010

Pre-Trial Conference: February 22, 2010

The Parties submit the following stipulation seeking an extension to file Joint Pre-Trial 

Conference Statement, Proposed Jury Instructions, and Motions in Limine due to the special 

circumstances described below: 

1. The final pre-trial conference in this case is set on February 22, 2010. 

2. There are two Plaintiffs in this case. Plaintiff Leonardo Espinoza is currently 

incarnated in Oregon. Plaintiff Sergio Rogue is scheduled for a sentencing hearing for a felony 

charge on February 22, 2010 and it is yet unclear whether jail time will be imposed. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge James Ware

1/22/2010

Case 5:08-cv-01522-JW Document 84 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 2
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

 10

 11

 12

 13

 14

 15

 16

 17

 18

 19

 20

 21

 22

 23

 24

 25

 26

 27

 28

Espinoza, et. al. v. C&C Security Patrol., et al. Page 2

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 

3. Given the circumstances, parties are making the last efforts to resolve this matter 

by way of settlement. 

4. Because of the incarceration of Plaintiff Espinoza, it is difficult to communicate 

settlement offers and obtain settlement authorities from Mr. Espinoza. 

5. Parties wish to have more time to work out a settlement before spending substantial 

amount of time in preparing for the pre-trial filings that are due on January 22, 2010. 

6. As such, parties agree and stipulate to seek one week extension to file Joint PreTrial Conference Statement, proposed jury instructions, and motions in limine until January 29, 

2010, and all other dates remain unchanged. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: January 21, 2010 

By: /s/ Adam Wang

 Adam Wang

 Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: January 21, 2010

By: /s/ Sejal Thakkar

 Sejal Thakkar

 Attorney for Defendants

___________________________________________________________

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to parties stipulation, good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that parties 

shall file their Joint Pre-trial Conference Statement, proposed jury instructions, and motions in 

limine no later than January 29, 2010. All other dates set in this case remain unchanged. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January ___, 2010 By: ____________________

JAMES WARE

US DISTRICT JUDGE 

The Court will not entertain further requests for extension. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge James Ware

22

Case 5:08-cv-01522-JW Document 84 Filed 01/22/10 Page 2 of 2