Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00504/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00504-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 130
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40:270 Miller Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

* This matter was determined to be suitable for decision without

oral argument. L.R. 78-230(h).

1 Since each Defendant filed an identical motion, the motions

will be referenced herein as “motion.” 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN PACIFIC L-C CORP., a )

California corporation; and CRAIG )

BROWN, )

) 2:07-cv-504-GEB-DAD

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) ORDER*

)

TIDEWATER CONTRACTORS INC., an )

Oregon corporation; UNITED STATES )

FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a )

Maryland corporation; and DOES )

1-10, )

)

Defendants. )

)

Defendants move for a more definite statement of Plaintiffs’

Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e).1

Plaintiffs filed a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion. 

Accordingly, Defendants’ motion is granted. Plaintiffs shall provide

a more definite statement regarding (i) who Plaintiff Craig Brown is;

Case 2:07-cv-00504-GEB-DAD Document 11 Filed 05/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

(ii) what Mr. Brown’s capacity and interests in this suit are; (iii)

who specifically is the other party to the alleged oral agreement with

Defendant Tidewater Contractors, Inc.; and (iv) to whom the sums

sought allegedly are due. Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint shall

be filed within ten (10) days of the date on which this Order is

filed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

 

Case 2:07-cv-00504-GEB-DAD Document 11 Filed 05/01/07 Page 2 of 2