Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01633/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01633-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Case No. 1:14-cv-01633-MCE-EPG:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114)

JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268)

T. KENNEDY HELM (State Bar No. 282319)

HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP

505 Seventeenth Street

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-5500

Facsimile: (510) 452-5510

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURIE DIGIANTOMASSO and RANDY 

DIGIANTOMASSO, Individually and as CoSuccessor in Interest of Decedent SHAYMUS 

DIGIANTOMASSO, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

KINGS COUNTY, a public entity; KINGS 

COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER DAVID

ROBINSON, in his individual and official 

capacity; KINGS COUNTY SHERIFF’S

COMMANDER KIM PEDREIRO, in her 

individual and official capacity; KINGS 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S SERGEANT SHERI 

HENDERSON; CALIFORNIA FORENSIC 

MEDICAL GROUP, INCORPORATED, a 

California corporation; TAYLOR FITHIAN, 

M.D.; MEGAN NABORS, L.V.N; DANIELLE 

ECKER; LINDA WEESNER, R.N.; 

MINNETTA COSTA, R.N.; JANA CEARLEY, 

L.P.T., and DOES 1–20, individually, jointly, 

and severally,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No: 1:14-cv-01633-MCE-EPG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE HEARING ON 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 

QUASH KINGS COUNTY 

DEFENDANTS’ SUBPOENAS

(ECF No. 80)

Case 1:14-cv-01633-MCE-EPG Document 81 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs and the Kings County Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, hereby 

stipulate to the following:

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash the Kings County Defendants’ Subpoenas (Doc. 77) is currently 

scheduled for hearing before this Court on January 22, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.

2. The parties believe that this matter is close to settlement, with the parties having participated 

in a mediation before the Honorable Raul A. Ramirez (Ret.) on January 12, 2016.

3. In light of the possible settlement, and to save attorneys’ fees and costs, the parties agree to 

continue the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash (Doc. 77) until Friday, February 19, 

2016, at 10:00 a.m.

4. The parties’ Joint Statement Re: Discovery Disagreement, as required by Eastern District 

Local Rule 251(c), would therefore be due on or before February 12, 2016. 

SO STIPULATED

Dated: January 22, 2016 HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP

/s/ T. Kennedy Helm_______________

T. KENNEDY HELM

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: January 22, 2016 WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP

/s/ Brande L. Gustafson*______________

JAMES J. ARENDT

BRANDE L. GUSTAFSON

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF KINGS; 

SHERIFF DAVID ROBINSON; COMMANDER KIM 

PEDREIRO; and SERGEANT SHERI HENDERSON

* Ms. Gustafson provided her consent that this document be electronically filed.

Case 1:14-cv-01633-MCE-EPG Document 81 Filed 01/26/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation, the Court continues the hearing on the Second Amended 

Motion to Quash (ECF No. 77) to February 19, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. The Joint Statement re: 

Discovery Disagreement shall be due no later than February 12, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 25, 2016 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01633-MCE-EPG Document 81 Filed 01/26/16 Page 3 of 3