Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-md-01486/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-md-01486-142/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOEL S. SANDERS, SBN 107234 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

One Montgomery Street 

Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 393-8200 

Facsimile: (415) 986-5308 

jsanders@gibsondunn.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND MICRON 

SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC. 

[Additional counsel listed on signature page] 

JOSEF D. COOPER, SBN 53015 

TRACY R. KIRKHAM, SBN 69912 

KELLY HORNE, SBN 242675 

COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C. 

655 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 788-3030 

Facsimile: (415) 882-7040 

jdc@coopkirk.com

trk@coopkirk.com

kah@coopkirk.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

[Additional counsel listed on signature page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS

MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION 

____________________________________ 

This document relates to: 

INDIRECT-PURCHASER ACTIONS. 

Master File No. M-02-1486-PJH 

MDL No. 1486 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MOTION 

FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR 

CLASS CERTIFICATION 

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 1821 Filed 02/20/08 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs and Defendants (collectively, the “parties”), by and 

through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, by order of the Court dated December 5, 2007, the briefing schedule and 

hearing date for Plaintiffs’ then pending motion for class certification was vacated and the 

Court stated that “the parties will be asked to file revised briefs on plaintiffs’ motion for class 

certification, which take into account the decision on the [Defendants’ pending] motion to 

dismiss,” then set for hearing on December 12, 2007; and 

WHEREAS, by order of the Court dated January 29, 2008, the Court issued its ruling 

on Defendants’ motion to dismiss and granted Plaintiffs until February 27, 2008, to file a 

Third Amended Complaint; and 

WHEREAS, the Court, in its January 29, 2008 Order, instructed the parties to meet 

and confer for the purpose of stipulating to a proposed schedule for the resubmission of 

Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, and to submit a stipulated proposed order no later 

than February 13, 2008; and 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED as follows: 

1. Plaintiffs shall have ninety (90) days from the date the Defendants file their 

Answer to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (or any subsequently filed 

amended complaint) to file their revised motion for class certification. 

2. Defendants shall have seventy-five (75) days from the date the motion is filed 

to file their opposition brief to the motion for class certification. 

3. Plaintiffs shall have forty-five (45) days from the date the opposition is filed 

to file their reply in support of their motion for class certification. 

4. The hearing on the motion for class certification shall be noticed no less than 

three weeks from the date the reply brief is to be filed. 

SO STIPULATED. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR 

CLASS CERTIFICATION 

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 1821 Filed 02/20/08 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DEFENDANTS: 

Dated: February 13, 2008 

James G. Kreissman 

Harrison J. Frahn IV 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

2550 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

jkreissman@stblaw.com

hfrahn@stblaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants Elpida Memory 

(USA), Inc. and Elpida Memory, Inc.

Robert B. Pringle 

Paul R. Griffin 

Jonathan E. Swartz 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER LLP 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

rbpringle@thelen.com

pgriffin@thelen.com

jswartz@thelen.com

Attorneys for Defendant NEC Electronics 

America, Inc. 

Kenneth R. O’Rourke 

Steven Bergman 

Timothy M. Martin 

O’Melveny & Myers, LLP 

4000 South Hope Street 

Los Angles, CA 90071 

KORourke@OMM.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc. and Hynix 

Semiconductor America, Inc., 

Howard M. Ullman 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE 

LLP 

The Orrick Building 

405 Howard Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 

hullman@Orrick.com

Robert Freitas 

ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE 

LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-1021 

rfreitas@orrick.com

Attorneys for Defendants Nanya 

Technology Corporation and Nanya 

Technology Corporation USA 

Stephen V. Bomse 

David C. Brownstein 

Scott E. Morgan 

HELLER EHRMAN, LLP 

333 Bush Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

stephen.bomse@hellerehrman.com

david.Brownstein@hellerehrman.com

scott.morgan@hellerehrman.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Mosel Vitelic 

Corporation and Mosel Vitelic 

Incorporated 

Aton Arbisser 

Julian Brew 

Joshua Stambaugh 

KAYE SCHOLER LLP

1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1700 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 788-1000 

Facsimile: (310) 788-1200 

aarbisser@kayescholer.com

jbrew@kayescholer.com

jstambaugh@kayescholer.com

Attorneys for Defendants Infineon

Technologies North America Corp. and 

Infineon Technologies AG 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR 

CLASS CERTIFICATION 

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 1821 Filed 02/20/08 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Joel S. Sanders 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

One Montgomery Street 

Montgomery Tower, 31st Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

jsanders@gibsondunn.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Micron 

Technology, Inc. and Micron 

Semiconductor Products, Inc. 

By: /S/

 Joel Sanders 

Signing on behalf of all defendants for 

purposes of this stipulation 

INDIRECT-PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS: 

Dated: February 13, 2008 

Daniel J. Mogin 

The Mogin Law Firm, PC 

110 Juniper Street 

San Diego, CA 92101-1502 

Telephone: (619) 687-6611 

Facsimile: (619) 687-6610 

dmogin@moginlaw.com

Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead 

Counsel 

David Boies, III 

Straus & Boies, LLP 

4041 University Drive, Fifth Floor 

Fairfax, VA 22030 

Telephone: (703) 764-8700 

Facsimile: (703-764-8704 

dboies@straus-boies.com

Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead 

Counsel 

Daniel Gustafson 

Gustafson Gluek, PLLC 

650 Northstar East 

608 Second Avenue, South 

Minneapolis, MN 55402 

Telephone: (612) 333-8844 

Facsimile: (612) 339-6622 

dgustafson@gustafsongluek.com

Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead 

Counsel 

Francis O. Scarpulla 

Zelle Hofmann Voelbel Mason & Gette, LLP 

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 693-0700 

Facsimile: (415) 693-0770 

fscarpulla@zelle.com

Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Liaison 

Counsel 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR 

CLASS CERTIFICATION 

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 1821 Filed 02/20/08 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Josef D. Cooper 

Cooper & Kirkham, P.C. 

655 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 788-3030 

Facsimile: (4150 882-7040 

jdc@coopkirk.com

Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead 

Counsel

By: _____________/S/______________ 

 Josef D. Cooper 

Signing on behalf of all Indirect-Purchaser 

Plaintiffs for purposes of this stipulation 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED this ___ day of February, 2008. 

__________________________________ 

The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton 

United States District Judge 

Northern District of California 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR 

CLASS CERTIFICATION 

20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:02-md-01486-PJH Document 1821 Filed 02/20/08 Page 5 of 5