Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_06-cv-01452/USCOURTS-azd-3_06-cv-01452-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John David Roettgen, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Derral Adams, et al.,

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-1452-PHX-DGC (ECV)

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Petitioner John David Roettgen’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus and United States Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss’s Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”). Dkt. ##1, 21. The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss

the petition with prejudice because this court is without jurisdiction to hear the petition.

Dkt. #21 at 3-4. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had ten days to file

objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver

of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 4 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ.

P. 6(a), 6(b), and 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).

The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review

the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)

(“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the

subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (“The district judge . . . shall make a de novo

determination . . . of any portion of the magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific

written objection has been made[.]”). The Court will accept the R&R and dismiss the Petition

Case 3:06-cv-01452-DGC Document 22 Filed 07/23/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

with prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject,

or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”);

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (same).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss’s R&R (Dkt. #21) is accepted.

2. Petitioner John David Roettgen’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. #1)

is denied with prejudice.

3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.

DATED this 23rd day of July, 2008.

Case 3:06-cv-01452-DGC Document 22 Filed 07/23/08 Page 2 of 2