Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00395/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00395-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARRISON S. JOHNSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT )

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF )

CALIFORNIA, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-cv-00395-LJO-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 5)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On April 10, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a

Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DISMISSED as successive. These Findings and Recommendation were

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were

to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of

that order. On May 14, 2007, Petitioner filed a motion to extend

time. On June 13, 2007, the court granted Petitioner an additional

thirty (30) days within which to respond. On July 3, 2007,

Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

Case 1:07-cv-00395-LJO-DLB Document 11 Filed 08/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendation are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed April 10, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as

successive; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment for Respondent and to

close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 16, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00395-LJO-DLB Document 11 Filed 08/16/07 Page 2 of 2