Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02042/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02042-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 August 11 is a Saturday; if production cannot take place on that date, it must take 1 th

place on Friday, August 10, 2007.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

L.H., A.Z., D.K., AND D.R., 

on behalf of themselves and all

other similarly situated juvenile 

parolees in California,

Plaintiffs, CIV. NO. S-06-2042 LKK GGH

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants. SUMMARY ORDER

 /

Previously pending on this court’s law and motion calendar for July 12, 2007, was

a discovery conference regarding electronic discovery, as requested by defendants. Maria Morris

appeared for plaintiffs. William Kwong and Monica Anderson appeared for defendants. Having

heard oral argument, the court issues the following summary order.

With respect to all electronic discovery concerning requests for production,

including privilege logs, except for “office tech” computer searches, the deadline for production

is August 11, 2007. Within ten days of August 11, 2007, plaintiffs’ counsel shall conduct a 1

cursory review of produced electronic discovery, and either agree with defendants’ counsel that a

Case 2:06-cv-02042-LKK-DAD Document 158 Filed 07/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

search for “office tech” discovery is not necessary, or make an emergency request which will be

placed on the court’s next law and motion calendar. 

The court takes under submission the appropriate remedies for the belated

commencement of electronic discovery searches by defendants.

Defendants represented in court that previously propounded interrogatories and

requests for production have been finally answered/responded to.

Should plaintiffs have a motion to make regarding completed discovery, they may

file it forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: 7/13/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 ______________________________

U.S. Magistrate Judge

L.H.2042.edsy 

Case 2:06-cv-02042-LKK-DAD Document 158 Filed 07/13/07 Page 2 of 2