Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04330/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04330-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING

AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO COMPEL Case No. C07 04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL J. BERGESON, Bar No. 105439

dbergeson@be-law.com

JOHN W. FOWLER, Bar No. 037463

jfowler@be-law.com

MELINDA M. MORTON, Bar No. 209373

mmorton@be-law.com

BERGESON, LLP

303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500

San Jose, CA 95110-2712

Telephone: (408) 291-6200

Facsimile: (408) 297-6000

Attorneys for Plaintiff

VERIGY US, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

VERIGY US, INC, a Delaware Corporation

Plaintiff,

vs.

ROMI OMAR MAYDER, an individual;

WESLEY MAYDER, an individual; SILICON

TEST SYSTEMS, INC., a California Corporation;

and SILICON TEST SOLUTIONS, LLC, a

California Limited Liability Corporation,

inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. C07 04330 RMW (HRL)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: BRIEFING AND HEARING

SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO COMPEL

Judge: Honorable Howard R. Lloyd

Ctrm: 2

Complaint Filed: August 22, 2007

Trial Date: None Set

*E-FILED: 10/3/2007* (MODIFIED BY THE COURT)

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 39 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 3
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING

AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO COMPEL Case No. C07 04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

Plaintiff, Verigy US, Inc. (“Verigy”), by and through its counsel of record, Bergeson, LLP

and Defendants Romi Omar Mayder, an individual, Wesley Mayder, an individual, Silicon Test

Systems, Inc. a California Corporation, and Silicon Test Solutions, LLC (“Defendants”) by and

through their counsel of record, Mount & Stoelker, PC, do hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

Whereas the parties wish to resolve a discovery dispute prior to the hearing on the

preliminary injunction, and request court approval of the following hearing and briefing schedule:

1. The hearing on Plaintiff’s proposed motion to compel shall be heard on

October 16, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the Court may hear the matter;

2. Plaintiff shall file and serve its motion to compel on Tuesday, October 2, 2007;

3. Defendants shall file and serve their opposition to the motion no later than October 9,

2007 at 5:00 p.m.

4. Plaintiff shall file and serve any reply and/or supplemental papers in support of its

motion by October 12, 2007 at 5:00 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: October 2, 2007 BERGESON, LLP

By:

Melinda M. Morton, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff Verigy

Dated: October 2, 2007 MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C.

By: ________________________________________

Kevin M. Pasquinelli, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants

19 XX XX 10:00

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 39 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING

AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO COMPEL Case No. C07 04330 RMW (HRL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

In accordance with the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and with good cause appearing

therefor, the Court enters the Stipulation as an Order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2007 By: __________________________

Honorable Howard R. Lloyd

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE COURT

JUDGE

^

(as modified by the court) October 3

Case 5:07-cv-04330-RMW Document 39 Filed 10/03/07 Page 3 of 3