Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01393/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01393-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

– CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01393-JST

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; and ORACLE 

INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a 

California corporation, 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and 

DOES 1-50, 

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01393-JST

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-2 

ACTION FILED: March 22, 2016 

JEFFREY T. THOMAS, SBN 106409

jtthomas@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

3161 Michelson Drive

Irvine, CA 92612-4412 

Telephone: 949.451.3800 

Facsimile: 949.451.4220 

SAMUEL LIVERSIDGE, SBN 180578 

sliversidge@gibsondunn.com 

BLAINE H. EVANSON, SBN 254338 

bevanson@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

333 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 

Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

Attorneys for Defendant

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 69 Filed 07/25/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

– CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01393-JST

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

 WHEREAS, on July 15, 2016, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendant Hewlett 

Packard Enterprise Company’s (“HPE”) motion to dismiss and granted Plaintiffs Oracle America, 

Inc. and Oracle International Corp. (“Oracle”) 30 days, or until August 15, 2016, to amend their

complaint, (ECF 65);

WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A), HPE’s answer to Oracle’s current 

complaint is currently due on July 29, 2016; 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and Oracle has indicated that it may file an 

amended complaint on or before August 15, 2016; 

 WHEREAS, HPE would then have to file a response to any amended complaint; 

 WHEREAS, the parties agree it would be more efficient for HPE to file a single response to 

the operative complaint rather than having to file a separate answer to the current complaint and 

response to any amended complaint; 

 THEREFORE, subject to the approval of the Court, the parties hereby stipulate that HPE shall 

have until the earlier of (i) 14 days following the date Oracle files its amended complaint, or (ii) 

August 29, 2016, to file its response to the operative complaint. 

 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 21, 2016 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By: /s/ Blaine H. Evanson Blaine H. Evanson 

Attorneys for Defendant

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY

 I hereby attest that all signatories to this stipulation 

concur in its filing.

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 69 Filed 07/25/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

– CASE NO. 3:16-CV-01393-JST

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP

Dated: July 21, 2016 

LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP 

By: /s/ Christopher B. Campbell 

Christopher B. Campbell

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORACLE AMERICA, INC. AND ORACLE 

INTERNATIONAL CORP.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Pursuant to Stipulation, it is SO ORDERED. Defendant Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Co.’s 

response to Oracle’s operative complaint shall be due by the earlier of (i) 14 days following the date 

Oracle files its amended complaint, or (ii) August 29, 2016. 

DATED: July 25, 2016

____________________________________ 

The Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

United States District Judge 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 69 Filed 07/25/16 Page 3 of 3