Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00483/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00483-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 23:1441 Contract Real Estate

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDY K. HARRIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV 2:10cv0483-JAM-JFM (PS)

vs.

HOMEQ SERVICING,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

On March 16, 2010, defendant filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). No

opposition to the motion to dismiss has been filed. 

Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o

party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition

to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 230(i) provides

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.”

Case 2:10-cv-00483-JAM -JFM Document 8 Filed 04/27/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of April 29, 2010 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s motion

to dismiss is continued to June 3, 2010 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than

May 20, 2010. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement

of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: April 26, 2010.

/014.harr0483.nooppo

Case 2:10-cv-00483-JAM -JFM Document 8 Filed 04/27/10 Page 2 of 2