Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02619/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02619-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 400
Nature of Suit: State Reapportionment
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MEDIATEK'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE TRUMBULL'S

ORDER—No. C-04-02619 RMW; No. C-04-04609 RMW

JAH

E-filed on: 1/14/06 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ZORAN CORPORATION and OAK

TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MEDIATEK, INC.; AUDIOVOX

CORPORATION; CHANGZHOU SHINCO

DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.;

INITIAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.; MINTEK

DIGITAL, INC.; SHINCO INTERNATIONAL

AV CO.; TERAPIN TECHNOLOGY PTE.,

LTD; and TERAOPTIX L.P. d/b/a TERAPIN

TECHNOLOGY,

Defendants.

No. C-04-02619 RMW; 

No. C-04-04609 RMW

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

ON MEDIATEK'S OBJECTIONS TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE TRUMBULL'S

ORDER RE WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE

[Re Docket No. 417]

MediaTek, Inc. objects to the December 15, 2005 order of Magistrate Judge Patricia V.

Trubull, who determined MediaTek had waived the attorney-client privilege and the work-product

protection by publicly disclosing that it had received "thorough input" from "several teams of U.S.

patent counsels" to help it design around a patent held by Zoran Corporation. MediaTek objects

under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and Civil L.R. 72-2. The court will consider MediaTek's objections. 

Case 5:04-cv-02619-RMW Document 433 Filed 01/14/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MEDIATEK'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE TRUMBULL'S

ORDER—No. C-04-02619 RMW; No. C-04-04609 RMW

JAH 2

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 72-2, plaintiffs are granted leave to file an opposition to MediaTek's

objections within ten days of the date of this order. No oral argument will be held absent further

order of the court.

DATED: 1/14/06 /s/ Ronald M. Whyte

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:04-cv-02619-RMW Document 433 Filed 01/14/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MEDIATEK'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE TRUMBULL'S

ORDER—No. C-04-02619 RMW; No. C-04-04609 RMW

JAH 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Defendants:

James C. Otteson jotteson@wsgr.com

Lisa G. McFall lmcfall@wsgr.com

Michael A. Ladra mladra@wsgr.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs:

Gerald T. Sekimura gsekimura@dlapiper.com

John Allcock JAllcock@dlapiper.com

Mark Fowler mfowler@dlapiper.com 

Thomas A. Burg tburg@dlapiper.com

William G. Goldman wgoldman@dlapiper.com

Dated: 1/14/06 /s/ JH 

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:04-cv-02619-RMW Document 433 Filed 01/14/06 Page 3 of 3