Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00289/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00289-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL JAMES, No. CIV.S-05-0289 GEB DAD PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

THOMAS BLAIR, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

By order to show cause filed June 28, 2005, plaintiff, who

is proceeding pro se, was directed to show cause in writing why this

case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

Plaintiff timely filed the required response along with a request for

extension of time to further respond to the order to show cause

through counsel. Plaintiff represents that an attorney has agreed to

represent him in this matter, although the court notes that no

substitution of counsel is on file.

In light of the circumstances, plaintiff’s request for

extension of time is granted in part. Plaintiff shall have an

Case 2:05-cv-00289-GEB-DAD Document 7 Filed 08/03/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

additional thirty (30) days from the date of this order to respond to

the order to show cause regarding subject matter jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 2, 2005.

DAD:th

Ddadl\orders.prose\james0289.eot

Case 2:05-cv-00289-GEB-DAD Document 7 Filed 08/03/05 Page 2 of 2