Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06636/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06636-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 At this juncture, Defendant Duran is the only party who may file a pretrial dispositive motion. (Docs. 93, 1

113.) 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES CHATMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

SERGEANT C. TYNER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:03-cv-06636-AWI-SMS PC

ORDER GRANTING AND RESOLVING 

REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION

(Doc. 123)

On June 17, 2008, Defendants filed a request for clarification of the Court’s order filed June

16, 2008. 

Defendants are not required to renew their motion for summary judgment filed on December

18, 2007. In the interest of conservation of the Court’s resources, it will be considered once the

witness issue is resolved by future order and the deadline for Defendant Duran to file a motion for

summary judgment passes. The order deeming Defendants’ pending motion vacated is 1

administrative in nature and requires no action on the part of the parties. 28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1).

Defendants’ request for clarification is HEREBY GRANTED AND RESOLVED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 18, 2008 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06636-OWW -SMS Document 124 Filed 06/19/08 Page 1 of 1