Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03175/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03175-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1 C05-03175 EDL

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

Cai v. Fishi Café, et al 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ADAM WANG (STATE BAR NUMBER 201233) 

DAL BON & WANG 

12 South First Street, Suite 613 

SAN JOSE, CA 95113 

Tel: (408) 292-1040 

Fax: (408) 292-1045 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Yun-Gui Cai 

Chao Jen Wahng (SBN 225672) 

Law Offices of Richard C. J. Wahng 

152 Anza Street, Suite 201 

Fremont, CA 94539 

(510) 490-4447 Telephone 

(510) 490-1102 Fax 

Adam C. Fullman (SBN 194249) 

Stefan O’Grady (SBN 224615) 

Fullman O’Grady Attorneys 

11580 Trask Avenue 

Garden Grove, CA 92843 

(714) 277-4428 Telephone 

(714) 280-4631 Fax 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

YUGUI CAI 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

FISHI CAFÉ, INC., AA CAFÉ, YING 

TSAI LIN, YEN CHENG LIN, 

YUEHYING CHENG & DOES 1 - 10, 

 Defendants

Case No.: C05-03175 EDL 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH 

PREJUDICE 

Plaintiffs and defendants, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. Parties have reached a settlement to disputes with respect to the claims alleged by 

the Plaintiff against all defendants except Great China Investment Realty Corp. 

Case 3:05-cv-03175-EDL Document 127 Filed 11/29/07 Page 1 of 2
 2 C05-03175 EDL

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

Cai v. Fishi Café, et al 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2. As such, parties hereby stipulate to dismiss this action in its entirety with 

prejudice, except that the Great China Investment Realty Corp. is entitled to a judgment pursuant 

to the Order granting summary judgment in favor of Great China Investment Realty Corp. 

3. The Parties stipulate that this Court vacate the trial set fro December 3, 2007, and 

should retain its jurisdiction over this case for the purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement. 

 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

Dated: November 21, 2007 DAL BON & WANG 

By: /s/ ADAM WANG 

 Adam Wang 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: November 21, 2007 

 By: ___/s/ Richard Wahng_

 Richard Wahng 

 Attorney for Defendants 

______________________________________________________ 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Pursuant to party’s stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November __, 2007 _________________________ 

 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

United States Magistrate Judge

The Court retains jurisdiction for the purpose of 

enforcing the settlement agreement until 

February 29, 2008 absent a showing of good 

cause to extend that deadline.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

28

Case 3:05-cv-03175-EDL Document 127 Filed 11/29/07 Page 2 of 2