Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00809/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00809-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD,

Plaintiff, No. 2:13-cv-0809 KJN P

vs.

K. ALLEN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel or “pro se”, in an action

brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts

lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v.

United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court

may request an attorney to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1);

Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332,

1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the

court must consider plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the

plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. 

Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse discretion in

declining to appoint counsel). The burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances is on the

1

Case 2:13-cv-00809-KJM-AC Document 16 Filed 07/29/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

plaintiff. Id. Circumstances common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and

limited law library access, do not establish exceptional circumstances that warrant a request for

voluntary assistance of counsel. 

Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff has

failed to meet his burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the

appointment of counsel at this time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for the

appointment of counsel (ECF No. 13) is denied without prejudice.

DATED: July 26, 2013

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

spri0809.31

2

Case 2:13-cv-00809-KJM-AC Document 16 Filed 07/29/13 Page 2 of 2