Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-02581/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-02581-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION; AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

CASE NO. C08 02581 JF 

421217.01 

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

ELLIOT R. PETERS - #158708 

WENDY J. THURM - #163558 

STEVEN P. RAGLAND - #221076 

COURTNEY TOWLE - #221698 

710 Sansome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

epeters@kvn.com

wthurm@kvn.com

sragland@kvn.com

ctowle@kvn.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

and THOMAS D. KOHLER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC, a Delaware 

Limited Liability Company, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, a 

limited liability partnership; and THOMAS D. 

KOHLER, an individual, 

Defendants. 

 

Case No. C08 02581 JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER ENLARGING DEFENDANTS’ 

TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; SETTING 

BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE 

FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

RESPONDING TO COMPLAINT; AND 

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

Date Comp. Filed: May 21, 2008 

Trial Date: None set. 

**E-filed 7/17/08** ---------------

Case 4:08-cv-02581-PJH Document 14 Filed 07/17/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION; AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

CASE NO. C08 02581 JF 

421217.01 

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rules 7-1(a)(5), 7-12, and 16-2(e), the undersigned 

parties submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order. 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Landmark Screens, LLC filed its First Amended Complaint on 

June 11, 2008; 

WHEREAS, following service of the First Amended Complaint, the parties stipulated to 

enlarge Defendants’ time to respond to the First Amended Complaint from July 7, 2008 to 

July 28, 2008; 

WHEREAS, this case was initially assigned to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd; 

WHEREAS, following a request for reassignment, this matter was reassigned to this 

Court on July 9, 2008; 

WHEREAS, an initial case management conference is currently scheduled for 

September 12, 2008 at 10:30 a.m.; 

WHEREAS, the first date available for a hearing on Defendants’ motion in response to 

the First Amended Complaint is Friday, September 26, 2008 at 9:00 a.m.; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to agreement of the parties; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 

1) Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, the deadline for all Defendants to 

answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint shall be extended to Friday, 

August 8, 2008. By agreeing to this stipulation, Defendants do not waive, and specifically 

preserve, all defenses, challenges, and responses to the First Amended Complaint and to this 

action generally that exist as of the date of this stipulation; 

2) Defendants’ motion responding to the First Amended Complaint, and any related 

papers, shall be filed no later than Friday, August 8, 2008; 

3) Plaintiff’s responding brief shall be filed no later than Friday, August 29, 2008; 

4) Defendants’ reply brief shall be filed no later than Friday, September 12, 2008; 

5) Defendants’ motion will be heard at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, September 26, 2008, or 

as soon thereafter as the Court may hear the matter; and 

Case 4:08-cv-02581-PJH Document 14 Filed 07/17/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION; AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

CASE NO. C08 02581 JF 

421217.01 

6) The initial Case Management Conference shall be continued to September 26, 

2008 at 10:30 a.m., to correspond with the hearing on Defendants’ motion. 

Dated: July 15, 2008 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ Steven P. Ragland 

STEVEN P. RAGLAND 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, a limited 

liability partnership; and THOMAS D. KOHLER, 

an individual 

Dated: July 15, 2008 MacPHERSON KWOK CHEN & HEID LLP 

By: /s/ Clark S. Stone 

CLARK S. STONE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC 

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the response, briefing, and hearing schedule set forth in 

the foregoing stipulation is hereby approved by the Court. 

The Case Management Conference in the above-captioned matter that was previously set 

for September 12, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. is hereby continued to September 26, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: 

HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

7/17/08

Case 4:08-cv-02581-PJH Document 14 Filed 07/17/08 Page 3 of 3