Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-338/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-03561 WHA

REQUEST TO COUNSEL

RE LAW REVIEW ARTICLES

By 1:00 P.M. TODAY, if possible, would each side please provide cites to one or two law

review articles (not treatises) that comprehensively address how allocation of profits (or

revenue) should be spread or allocated across numerous factors or ingredients contributing to

profits (or revenue). The Court is particularly interested in what methods are recognized for

weighting the ingredients or factors and the extent to which experts should consider all methods

rather than selecting a result-oriented option. 

Also, in your title in captions, please say more than “Response to ECF # X,” and add a

phrase like “Re Proposed Instruction on Fair Use.”

Dated: April 15, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1669 Filed 04/15/16 Page 1 of 1