Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01829/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01829-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBIN GILLEN STARR,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-1829 CKD P

ORDER and

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed January 4, 2017, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty 

days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was warned that failure to 

file a second amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district 

judge to this action; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

 

1

 On January 30, 2017, plaintiff filed a document titled “Notice of Objections to Magistrates, 

Clerks Orders, On I.F.P . . .” The contents of the document are unintelligible.

Case 2:16-cv-01829-KJM-CKD Document 60 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991).

Dated: February 13, 2017

1

star1829.fta

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-01829-KJM-CKD Document 60 Filed 02/13/17 Page 2 of 2