Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00552/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00552-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On February 6, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation for an extension of time for Defendant to file 

a response to Plaintiff’s opening brief. (Doc. 15) Notably, the Scheduling Order allows for a single 

extension of thirty days by the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 7 at 4), which was previously used by 

Plaintiff. (Docs. 12, 13) Beyond that extension, “requests to modify [the scheduling] order must be 

made by written motion and will be granted only for good cause.” (Doc. 7 at 4) Based upon the 

information provided and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:

1. Defendant’s request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and

2. Defendant SHALL file a response to the brief on or before February 27, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 8, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

BRYAN RUSSELL PENDERGAST,

 Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-0552- JLT 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST 

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

(Doc. 15)

Case 1:16-cv-00552-JLT Document 16 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 1:16-cv-00552-JLT Document 16 Filed 02/09/17 Page 2 of 2