Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-02632/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-02632-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAGGIE CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

EBAY, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-02632-HSG 

ORDER DENYING “OBJECTION TO 

SETTLEMENT” AND 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

CONSIDER CALL TO APPOINT CLASS 

COUNSEL

Re: Dkt. No. 114

On March 9, 2015, Reginald Burgess, a third party to this action appearing pro se, filed a

document styled as an “Objection to Settlement re: Skelly Association of Counsel Agreement.” 

On March 16, 2015, counsel for Mr. Burgess and other third parties Lacy Reintsma, Caleb 

Reintsma, Amy Rickel, Fred Rickel, and Colette Tapia (collectively, “Third Parties”) filed an 

Administrative Motion to Consider Call to Appoint Class Counsel. Dkt. No. 114. Under the 

Court’s October 24, 2014 Order, these “Third Parties have no basis to appear in this action.” Dkt. 

No. 101 at 6. The Court denies the Motion and “Objection.” The Court will consider the 

adequacy of proposed class counsel at the class certification stage, consistent with the controlling 

legal standards.

//

//

//

//

//

//

Case 4:13-cv-02632-HSG Document 121 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Before filing any future motion or request in this case, the Third Parties, or an attorney 

acting on their behalf, must first seek leave of Court. Any request for leave must comply with 

Civil Local Rule 7-11. The Court may disregard and/or strike any motion or request that does not 

comport with this Order or any applicable Rule. See Fernando v. PayPal, Inc., 2013 WL 

2253785, at *5 (N.D. Cal. May 22, 2013). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

3/20/2015

Case 4:13-cv-02632-HSG Document 121 Filed 03/20/15 Page 2 of 2