Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_15-cv-00002/USCOURTS-azd-4_15-cv-00002-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Blake Haines, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Get Air Tucson Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-15-00002-TUC-RM (EJM)

ORDER 

 On February 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich issued a Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 159) recommending that this Court grant Pacific Urethane, 

LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 103). No objections to the Report and Recommendation 

were filed. 

 A district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions” of a 

magistrate judge’s “report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which 

objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The advisory committee’s notes to Rule 

72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that, “[w]hen no timely objection is 

filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record 

in order to accept the recommendation” of a magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 

advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition. See also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 

F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the 

district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.”); Prior v. Ryan, 

CV 10-225-TUC-RCC, 2012 WL 1344286, at *1 (D. Ariz. Apr. 18, 2012) (reviewing for 

Case 4:15-cv-00002-RM-EJM Document 167 Filed 03/21/17 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

clear error unobjected-to portions of Report and Recommendation). 

 The Court has reviewed Judge Markovich’s Report and Recommendation, the 

parties’ briefs, and the record. The Court finds no error in Judge Markovich’s Report and 

Recommendation. Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 159) is accepted 

and adopted in full. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Pacific Urethane, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss 

(Doc. 103) is granted. Defendant Pacific Urethanes, LLC is dismissed from this action 

with prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. 

 Dated this 20th day of March, 2017. 

Honorable Rosemary Márquez

United States District Judge

 

Case 4:15-cv-00002-RM-EJM Document 167 Filed 03/21/17 Page 2 of 2