Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03181/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03181-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION 

CASE NO. C-04-3181 (MJJ)

SUSAN MUCK (CSB No. 126930) 

smuck@fenwick.com 

CATHERINE DUDEN KEVANE (CSB No. 215501) 

JENNIFER C. BRETAN (CSB No. 233475) 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

275 Battery Street, Suite 1500 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

EMMETT C. STANTON (CSB No. 83930) 

estanton@fenwick.com 

TANYA HERRERA (CSB No. 177790) 

therrera@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Defendants INVISION 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SERGIO MAGISTRI and 

ROSS MULHOLLAND 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE INVISION TECHNOLOGIES, 

INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 

Case No. C-04-3181 (MJJ) 

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING 

AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION 

TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED 

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

This Stipulation is entered into by and among lead plaintiffs, The Glazer Funds 

(“Plaintiffs”) and defendants InVision Technologies, Inc. (“InVision”), Sergio Magistri and Ross 

Mulholland (collectively, “Defendants”) by and through their respective attorneys of record, as 

follows: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint on February 22, 

2006; 

WHEREAS, the parties have customarily set a briefing schedule for motions in this 

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 81 Filed 03/13/2006 Page 1 of 3

GRANTED

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 83 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION 

CASE NO. C-04-3181 (MJJ) 

2 

matter, subject to the Court’s availability; 

WHEREAS this schedule will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed 

by Court order; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-

1(a), that: 

(1) Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second Amended Consolidated Complaint shall 

be filed on or before March 27, 2006; 

(2) Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before 

May 1, 2006; 

(3) Defendants’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before 

May 22, 2006; and 

(4) The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be on June 6, 2006, or such 

other date as the Court may find convenient. 

Dated: March 13, 2006 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: s/Susan S. Muck 

 Susan S. Muck 

Attorneys for Defendants 

INVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; SERGIO 

MAGISTRI and ROSS MULHOLLAND 

Dated: March 13, 2006 ABRAHAM, FRUCHTER & TWERSKY, LLP 

By: s/Jeffrey S. Abraham 

 Jeffrey S. Abraham 

Lead Counsel for the Plaintiffs 

23570/00404/LIT/1246239.2 

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 81 Filed 03/13/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 83 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 81 Filed 03/13/2006 Page 3 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

3/16/2006

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

Case 3:04-cv-03181-MJJ Document 83 Filed 03/16/06 Page 3 of 3