Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-06744/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-06744-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTHONY ROSIER WILSON, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ROBERT NEUSCHMID, 

Defendant.

CASE NO. 18-cv-06744-YGR 

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SHOW 

CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT 

BE GRANTED

Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. No. 2.) It does not appear from the face of the petition that it is without 

merit. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby issues the following orders: 

1. Respondent shall file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner, within sixty (60) days

of the issuances of this Order, an Answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the 

Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus 

should not be issued. Respondent shall file with the Answer a copy of all portions of 

the relevant state records that have been transcribed previously and that are relevant to 

a determination of the issues presented by the petition. 

2. If the Petitioner wishes to respond to the Answer, he shall do s by filing a Traverse 

with the Court and serving it on the Respondent within sixty (60) days of his receipt of 

the Answer. Should Petitioner fail to do so, the petition will be deemed submitted and 

ready for decision sixty (60) days after the date Petitioner is served with Respondent’s 

Answer. 

3. Respondent may file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner, within sixty (60) days 

of the issuance of this Order, a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an 

Answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules 

Case 4:18-cv-06744-YGR Document 6 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

Governing Section 2254 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file 

with the Court and serve on Respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition 

to the motion within sixty (60) days of receipt of the motion and Respondent shall file 

with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fourteen (14) days of receipt of 

any opposition. 

4. Extensions of time are not favored, though reasonable extensions will be granted. Ay 

motion for an extension of time must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to 

the deadline sought to be extended. 

The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order and petition and all attachments 

thereto upon Respondent and Respondent’s attorney, the Attorney General of the State of 

California. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

April 12, 2019

Case 4:18-cv-06744-YGR Document 6 Filed 04/12/19 Page 2 of 2