Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06583/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06583-66/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 While the document states it is a stipulation and has a place on it for the signature of 1

Defendants’ attorney, the court notes that the copy of the document in the undersigned’s

possession does not contain the signature of Defendants’ attorney.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRY D. HAMILTON, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. )

)

HENRY WI. WILLMS, et al, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1: 02-CV-6583 AWI SMS

ORDER ALLOWING ENTITY

DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY

BRIEF BY JANUARY 2, 2008

Attorney David F. Brown, stating that he is specially appearing for Plaintiffs Estates in

Eagle Ridge, LLP, James C. Bateman Petroleum Services, and Enviro-Safe, Inc. (“Entity

Plaintiffs”), filed a motion to set-aside Document 664, which was the court’s order dismissing

Entity Plaintiffs from this action. Upon the parties’ stipulation, this motion was re-set for a

hearing to be held on December 10, 2007. On December 6, 2007, the court vacated the

December 10, 2007 hearing and took the motion under submission.

On December 6, 2007, Attorney David F. Brown filed a stipulation to continue the

motion to set-aside Document 664. Entity Plaintiffs ask that the hearing be continued until

1

January 7, 2008, and that Entity Plaintiffs be allowed to file a reply brief by December 31, 2007.

Case 1:02-cv-06583-AWI-SMS Document 695 Filed 12/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Entity Plaintiffs had requested that they be allowed to file their reply brief by December 2

31, 2007. The courthouse will be closed on December 31, 2007 and January 1, 2008. 

2

The court has reviewed the moving papers and opposition and has already determined

that the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(h). However,

in the interests of justice and based on the parties’ stipulation, the court will grant Entity

Plaintiffs until January 2, 2008 to file a reply brief. 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Entity Plaintiffs may file any reply brief by 4:00 p.m. on January 2, 2008; and

2. This matter will remain under submission and the court will issue a decision after

January 2, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 12, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

9h0d30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06583-AWI-SMS Document 695 Filed 12/13/07 Page 2 of 2