Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00348/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00348-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC L. WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-348 LKK KJM P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On April 16, 2007, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed March 27, 2007, finding service of his amended complaint appropriate for

defendants Calvo, Sakula, Mehta, Leong, Osajindu and Jagow, but not for defendants Woodford

or Kaplan. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that

it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

/////

/////

/////

/////

////

Case 2:06-cv-00348-LKK -KJM Document 20 Filed 07/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed March 27, 2007, is affirmed. 

DATED: July 2, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00348-LKK -KJM Document 20 Filed 07/02/07 Page 2 of 2