Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00897/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00897-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

A.D., et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, Case No. C07-0897 MHP 1 

Amended Stip/Order Extending Mediation Deadline 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JAMES B. CHANIN (SBN 76043) 

JULIE M. HOUK (SBN 114968) 

LAW OFFICES OF JAMES B. CHANIN 

3050 Shattuck Avenue 

Berkeley, California 94705 

Telephone: (510) 848-4752, Ext. 2 

Facsimile: (510) 848-5819 

Email: jbcofc@aol.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

A.D., a minor, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO; et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO.: C07-0897 MHP 

AMENDED STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

DEADLINE TO COMPLETE 

MEDIATION 

 

 WHEREAS, all parties believe that additional discovery needs to be completed in order 

to have a productive mediation session; 

 WHEREAS, plaintiffs’ counsel has been attempting to locate a key percipient witness to 

the underlying incident so that he may be deposed prior to the mediation; and 

 WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred with each other and the mediator and 

have all agreed upon a mediation date that is prior to the further Case Management Conference 

set for October 22, 2007, and 

Case 3:07-cv-00897-MHP Document 35 Filed 09/12/07 Page 1 of 2
A.D., et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, Case No. C07-0897 MHP 2 

Amended Stip/Order Extending Mediation Deadline 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WHEREAS, counsel for the parties were advised that the Mediator is not available to 

hold the Mediation on October 16, 2007, as the parties had anticipated, but the parties expect to 

be able to complete the Mediation prior to the October 22, 2007, Case Management Conference, 

 THE PARTIES DO HEREBY AGREE, STIPULATE AND RESPECTFULLY 

REQUEST that the Court extend the deadline for the parties to complete the mediation in the 

above-entitled action to October 19, 2007. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: September 7, 2007 ______________________________ 

 JAMES B. CHANIN 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: September 7, 2007 _______________________________ 

 SEAN F. CONNOLLY 

 Attorney for Defendants 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: September ___, 2007 _______________________________ 

 MARILYN H. PATEL 

 Judge of the United States 

 District Court 

11

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:07-cv-00897-MHP Document 35 Filed 09/12/07 Page 2 of 2