Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00369/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00369-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIFFANY SODANO; JASON SODANO,

Plaintiffs, No. 2:12-cv-00369 KJM KJN PS

v.

CHASE BANK USA, NA; CHASE

BANK CARD SERVICES,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Presently before the court is plaintiff Tiffany Sodano’s ex parte request for a 30-

day extension of time in which to file a further amended complaint in this case (Dkt. No. 21).1

The undersigned denies Ms. Sodano’s ex parte as prematurely filed.

On May 1, 2012, the undersigned filed findings and recommendations in this case

that, among other things, recommended the dismissal of plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint with

leave to amend. (See Findings & Recommendations at 16-17, Dkt. No. 18.) Plaintiffs’ deadline

to further amend their Amended Complaint will be set by a separate order and will run from the

date that the district judge assigned to this case resolves the undersigned’s recommendations. No

party objected to the findings and recommendations, and the district judge has not yet adopted or

This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California 1

Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

1

Case 2:12-cv-00369-KJM-KJN Document 22 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

rejected the undersigned’s pending recommendations. Because the time within which plaintiffs

must file a further amended complaint has not yet begun to run, Ms. Sodano’s ex parte request is

premature. Accordingly, the undersigned denies Ms. Sodano’s request as prematurely filed. 

For the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Tiffany

Sodano’s ex parte request for a 30-day extension of time in which to file a further amended

complaint (Dkt. No. 21) is denied without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 30, 2012

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:12-cv-00369-KJM-KJN Document 22 Filed 06/01/12 Page 2 of 2