Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02553/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02553-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARES, INC., et al.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2553 FCD GGH

vs. ORDER

MICHAEL O. LEAVITT,

Defendant. 

 /

Defendant has now been in possession of plaintiff’s written position on the

discovery disagreement(s) for over a week now. Thus, although not expressly applicable, the

renoticing of the motion to compel in this case should be viewed in conjunction with the last

sentence of E.D. Cal. Local Rule 37-251(a) which provides that if the notice of motion is served

in conjunction with the joint statement, the court need only be given three days notice. 

Defendant has had sufficient time in which to draft a response.

The Ex Parte Application to Vacate the March 13, 2008, hearing is denied. 

Defendant shall submit his response to plaintiff’s portion of the joint statement by close of 

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:05-cv-02553-FCD-GGH Document 115 Filed 03/07/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

business (5:00 p.m.) March 10, 2008. Defendant shall file with the court both plaintiff’s portion

of the joint statement as received by defendant as well as defendant’s.

Dated: 03/07/08

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

_____________________________

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-02553-FCD-GGH Document 115 Filed 03/07/08 Page 2 of 2