Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00815/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00815-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOUANG SAECHO, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LANDRY’S INC, a Delaware corporation,

and McCORMICK & SCHMICK

RESTAURANT CORP., a Delaware

corporation,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-00815 WHA

ORDER DENYING

DEFENDANT’S REQUEST

TO CONTINUE HEARING ON

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

CLASS CERTIFICATION

Defendant McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp. has filed a motion for

administrative relief seeking to continue the hearing on plaintiff’s motion for class certification,

which the Court continued to March 10, because Attorney Nicholas Murray, the lead associate

assigned to this case, will be on vacation that week. McCormick & Schmick does not state that

Attorney Murray will conduct the oral argument on its behalf and offers only the conclusory

statement that it will be prejudiced if Attorney Murray cannot attend the hearing. Plaintiff

opposes McCormick & Schmick’s motion because further continuing the resolution of this

motion (for which the deadline has already been extended due to McCormick & Schmick’s

discovery delays) will not allow enough time for class notice, if necessary, before any

dispositive motions will be heard. 

No good cause shown, McCormick & Schmick’s request for a continuance is hereby

DENIED. All deadlines remain in place.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-00815-WHA Document 80 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 1