Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-6_05-cv-06069/USCOURTS-arwd-6_05-cv-06069-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HOT SPRINGS DIVISION

KENDRICK HILL PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 05-6069

 

GARLAND COUNTY JAIL;

SHERIFF LARRY SELIG;

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTION DIAGNOSTIC UNIT,

PINE BLUFF, AND MEDICAL 

INTAKE MANAGER; ARKANSAS

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

OUACHITA RIVER CORRECTIONAL

UNIT; WARDEN DALE REED; 

CMS CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL 

SERVICES; and DR JONAK DEFENDANTS

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Kendrick Hill filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on

September 12, 2005. His complaint was filed in forma pauperis (IFP). 

On October 3, 2005, the undersigned entered an order (Doc. 6) directing Hill to complete,

sign and return an attached addendum to his complaint. The addendum was to be returned by

October 28, 2005. 

To date, the completed addendum has not been returned to the court. Hill has not

requested an extension of time to complete the addendum and has not communicated with the

court. The court’s order and attached addendum have not been returned by the United States

Postal Service as undeliverable. 

I therefore recommend Hill’s claims be dismissed on the grounds he has failed to obey

an order of this court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Hill has ten days from receipt of the report

and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Case 6:05-cv-06069-RTD Document 7 Filed 11/09/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions

of fact. Hill is reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo

review by the district court.

DATED this 9th day of November 2005.

/s/ Bobby E. Shepherd 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 6:05-cv-06069-RTD Document 7 Filed 11/09/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>