Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01910/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01910-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:405 Fair Housing Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STARSHENE COATES and )

PROJECT SENTINEL, a ) Case No. 1:14-cv-01910-LJO-SKO

California Not-for-profit ) 

Corporation, ) JOINT APPLICATION AND 

Plaintiffs, ) STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE

vs. ) OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ 

) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

ANIL SINGH and ROSELYN ) PLEADINGS UNTIL JANUARY 12,

SINGH, Individually and Doing ) 2016; ORDER

Business as Singh’s Rental, )

 )

Defendants. ) 

The parties to this action, by and through their counsel of record, hereby 

stipulate and apply for a two-week continuance of the hearing on defendants’ 

motion for judgment on the pleadings, PACER document 36, filed on November 

23, 2015. There is good cause to grant this brief continuance:

First, this request is based on the agreement of all parties.

Second, this short continuance does not affect any of the other deadlines or 

delay the trial in this case. Even if the continuance is granted, the motion will be 

heard before the dispositive motion hearing cut off, which is presently January 27, 

2016. 

Third, no continuances or extensions have been sought previously.

Fourth, the current hearing date of December 29, 2015, and the need to 

Case 1:14-cv-01910-SKO Document 40 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

review defendants’ reply brief, interferes with plaintiffs’ counsel’s plans over the 

winter holidays. This brief continuance will allow plaintiffs’ attorneys to spend the 

week between Christmas and New Years Eve with family.

SO STIPULATED.

Filing counsel attests that all parties whose electronic signatures appear 

below have consented to this document. 

Dated: December 14, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

BRANCART & BRANCART 

 /s/ Liza Cristol-Deman 

Liza Cristol-Deman

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LEWIS, BRISBOIS, BISGAARD & 

SMITH, LLP

/s/ Joann M. O. Rangel

Joann M.O. Rangel

Attorneys for Defendants

PASCUZZI, PASCUZZI & STOKER

/s/ Steven R. Stoker

Steven R. Stoker

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 15, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01910-SKO Document 40 Filed 12/15/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

Case 1:14-cv-01910-SKO Document 40 Filed 12/15/15 Page 3 of 3