Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01527/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01527-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VASILIS SAKELLARIDIS,

Petitioner,

v.

DAVE DAVEY, Warden,

Respondent.

1:14-cv-01527-LJO-GSA-HC

ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO 

LODGE DOCUMENTS WITH THE CLERK 

OF COURT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254. 

On September 24, 2014, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court. 

(ECF No. 1). On December 22, 2014, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. (ECF 

No. 14). On January 5, 2015, Petitioner filed his opposition to Respondent’s motion to dismiss. 

(ECF No. 15). On January 12, 2014, Respondent filed his reply to Petitioner’s opposition. 

In his motion to dismiss, Respondent argues that federal habeas jurisdiction is lacking

because the ninety days of credit that Petitioner lost for the challenged disciplinary proceeding 

on disciplinary action Log # 3C-13-05-004 were restored to him. Petitioner argues that there is 

jurisdiction because the challenged disciplinary conviction rendered him ineligible for restoration 

of 90 days of previously forfeited good time credit on Log # 3C-13-04-021. Petitioner also 

argues that there is jurisdiction because he was placed in workgroup C for 180 days as a result of 

Case 1:14-cv-01527-LJO-EPG Document 18 Filed 02/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the challenged disciplinary conviction, and that rendered him unable to earn good time credits 

for that time period.

Upon a review of the record, the Court notes that it does not have sufficient 

documentation to determine whether Petitioner would be eligible to have the ninety days of 

credit lost on the previous, unrelated disciplinary action, restored if this Court grants habeas 

relief to Petitioner on the challenged disciplinary conviction. Therefore, the Court requires 

further documentation before it can render a decision on whether this Court has jurisdiction on 

the petition for habeas corpus. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner is DIRECTED to lodge the 

following documents with the Clerk of Court within THIRTY (30) days of the date of service of 

this Order:

1. The CDCR Form 958, Application for Inmate’s Restoration of Credits, for Petitioner’s

Rules Violation Report (RVR) on Log #3C-13-04-021, that he filed with his caseworker. 

If Petitioner did not file a CDC Form 958 for the RVR on Log #3C-13-04-021, he is 

DIRECTED to explain why he did not submit the Form;

2. The CDCR Form 115, RVR, on Log #3C-13-04-021;

3. Any administrative appeals relative to RVR on Log # 3C-13-04-021;

4. Any habeas petitions filed regarding RVR on Log #3C-13-04-021; and

5. Any orders on habeas petitions filed regarding RVR on Log #3C-13-04-021.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01527-LJO-EPG Document 18 Filed 02/18/15 Page 2 of 2