Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03831/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03831-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James Eugene Jones, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al. 

 Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV05-3831-PHX-SRB

ORDER

Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

on November 25, 2005 claiming that the aggravation of his sentence was based upon factors

not admitted to or determined by the jury was a violation of his right to trial by jury and that

trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object. On May 12, 2006, Respondents filed their

answer to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No reply was filed. On July 18,

2006, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation recommending that the

petition be dismissed with prejudice because it was filed after the running of the one-year

statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (d)(i)(A) and there was neither statutory or

equitable tolling.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

Case 2:05-cv-03831-SRB Document 22 Filed 09/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed

with prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 13th day of September, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03831-SRB Document 22 Filed 09/14/06 Page 2 of 2