Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05822/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05822-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN E. JAMES, III,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DONALD POMPAN, M.D., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05822-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 15)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

DEFENDANTS

ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff, John E. James, III (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On February 17, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Finding and Recommendations herein

which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to

the Finding and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On March 22, 2005,

plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Finding and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305,

this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds the Finding and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

analysis. As shown by the Magistrate Judge, mere disagreement with diagnosis or treatment does

Case 1:04-cv-05822-AWI-DLB Document 17 Filed 04/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

not support a claim of deliberate indifference. Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir.

1989). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Finding and Recommendations, filed February 17, 2005, are ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. Defendant Dr. Nuebarth of Pleasant Valley State Prison is DISMISSED from this

action;

3. Defendant Dr. Klarich of Corcoran State Prison is DISMISSED from this action; 

4. This case SHALL PROCEED against the remaining Salinas Valley State Prison

(SVSP) defendants; and,

5. This action is TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California, the judicial

district in which SVSP is located.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05822-AWI-DLB Document 17 Filed 04/21/05 Page 2 of 2