Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02270/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02270-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Debbie Vega-Weaver, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

The Brebner Law Firm, P.C., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-05-2270-PHX-LOA

ORDER

This matter arises on Plaintiff's March 20, 2006, ex-parte letter mailed directly

to the Court "asking the court to reconsider the rulings in both cases [there is only one case]

that were ordered on March 3rd, 2006[]" for the "sole reason [that Plaintiff] was never

properly served by either party. . . ." Overlooking that this pro se litigant has failed to

properly file her letter with the Clerk, the Court will treat her letter as a motion to set aside

judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), FED.R.CIV.P.

The Court's docket indicates that Judgment was entered herein on March 3, 2006

as a result of the Court's granting Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Case (docket # 15), filed

on November 18, 2005. On January 18, 2006, the Court ordered, among other things, that

Plaintiff be provided notice of the two pending dispositive motions and that she or her new

attorney, if any, file a written response by February 17, 2006. Former Plaintiff's counsel

having facially complied with the Court's January 18, 2006 order and there being no timely

written response to the dispositive motion despite fair warning to Plaintiff, the Court granted

Case 2:05-cv-02270-LOA Document 25 Filed 03/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

the Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Case on March 3, 2006.

Plaintiff's motion fails to articulate any of the grounds identified within Rule

60(b) much less raise a colorable claim under the Rule 60(b) to warrant an evidentiary

hearing on receipt of notice. In fact, her letter confirms her mailing address is 7515 E.

Diamond Circle, Mesa, Az 85208, the same location where former Plaintiff's counsel mailed

copies of this Court's January 18, 2006 order and additional copies of Defendants' dispositive

motions. Plaintiff has been given more than fair notice and opportunity to continue the

litigation that she started. Defendants are entitled to the finality of this case.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's pro se motion to set aside judgment pursuant

to Rule 60(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to electronically mail all

former counsel with a copy of this order and a hard copy to Plaintiff at 7515 E. Diamond

Circle, Mesa, Az 85208.

DATED this 23rd day of March, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02270-LOA Document 25 Filed 03/24/06 Page 2 of 2