Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00970/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00970-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VIOREL ROTAR, No. 2:06-cv-0970-MCE-GGH-PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

COLETTE SKAGGS, ET AL., 

Defendants.

__________________________/

On August 1, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice that any objections to the findings and

recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff

filed objections on August 4, 2006, and they were considered by

the district judge.

///

///

///

///

Case 2:06-cv-00970-MCE -GGH Document 11 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed

findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business

Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455

U.S. 920 (1982). As to any portion of the proposed findings of

fact to which no objection has been made, the court assumes its

correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See

Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The

magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See

Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th

Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and,

good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt

the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed August

1, 2006, are ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: September 8, 2006

_________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00970-MCE -GGH Document 11 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 2