Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04697/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04697-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING Case No. 4:09-cv-04697-CW (EDL) 

KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN (SBN 202634) 

Email: kkhachatourian@mintz.com 

BRYAN J. SINCLAIR (SBN 205885) 

Email: bsinclair@mintz.com 

JEFFREY M. RATINOFF (SBN 197241) 

Email: jratinoff@mintz.com 

MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY 

AND POPEO P.C. 

5 Palo Alto Square - 6th Floor 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 

Telephone: (650) 251-7700 

Facsimile: (650) 251-7739 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD., a 

Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

DEVICEVM, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

and BENEDICT CHONG, an individual, 

Defendants.

 Case No. 4:09-cv-04697-CW (EDL) 

SECOND STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING 

THE HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE REGARDING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER BASED ON CAL. 

CIV. PROC. CODE § 2019.210 

Complaint filed: July 17, 2009 

Trial Date: None Set

 

Case 4:09-cv-04697-CW Document 59 Filed 01/06/10 Page 1 of 3 Case4:09-cv-04697-CW Document58 Filed01/05/10 Page1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 

SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING Case No. 4:09-cv-04697-CW (EDL) 

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, on December 21, 2009 Defendants DeviceVM, Inc. and Benedict Chong filed a 

Motion for Protective Order Based on Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 2019.210 (“the Motion”) and set the 

hearing date for January 26, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants and Plaintiff Phoenix Technologies Ltd. (“Plaintiff”)

appeared before the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte on December 22, 2009; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants and Plaintiff have agreed to a further continuance of 

the hearing date and briefing schedule related to the Motion as a result of counsel for Plaintiff’s 

pending change of law firms; 

ACCORDINGLY, the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, HEREBY 

STIPULATE to continue the Motion hearing date and briefing schedule as follows: 

x The last court day for Plaintiff to file its opposition to the Motion is 

continued from January 12, 2010 to January 19, 2010; 

x The last court day for Defendants to file their reply is continued from January 

19, 2010 to January 26, 2010;

x The last court day for Plaintiff to submit its Rule 79-5 declaration in response 

to Defendants’ motion to seal is January 19, 2010; and 

x The hearing date for the Motion is continued from February 2, 2010 to 

February 9, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the Court’s schedule permits. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 5, 2010 MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.

 /s/ Bryan J. Sinclair 

 By: KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN 

BRYAN J. SINCLAIR 

JEFFREY M. RATINOFF 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 

//

//

//

Case 4:09-cv-04697-CW Document 59 Filed 01/06/10 Page 2 of 3 Case4:09-cv-04697-CW Document58 Filed01/05/10 Page2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 

SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING Case No. 4:09-cv-04697-CW (EDL) 

Dated: January 5, 2010 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

 /s/ Peter T. Snow 

 By: STEPHEN J. AKERLEY 

ERIC J. AMDURSKY 

PETER T. SNOW 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 

DEVICEVM, INC. and Defendant BENEDICT CHONG.

ATTESTATION

 I, Bryan J. Sinclair, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Second Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Hearing Date and Briefing Schedule 

Regarding Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order. In compliance with General Order 45. X.B., 

I hereby attest that Peter T. Snowy has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: January 5, 2010 MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.

 /s/ Bryan J. Sinclair 

 By: KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN 

BRYAN J. SINCLAIR 

JEFFREY M. RATINOFF 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________________ 

 THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

4803888v.1

Case4:09-cv-04697-CW Document58 Filed01/05/10 Page3 of 3

January 6, 2010

Case 4:09-cv-04697-CW Document 59 Filed 01/06/10 Page 3 of 3