Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01413/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01413-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL HARRISON,

Plaintiff,

v.

BIRTWELL, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:24-cv-1413 CSK P

ORDER AND FINDINGS & 

RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed August 5, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days leave 

to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and 

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the Court’s order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 

110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 

Case 2:24-cv-01413-DC-CSK Document 10 Filed 09/12/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: September 12, 2024

/1/harr1413.fta

Case 2:24-cv-01413-DC-CSK Document 10 Filed 09/12/24 Page 2 of 2