Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00290/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00290-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Durrell A. Puckett is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 22, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which 

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that Objections to the Findings and 

Recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No Objections were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

///

///

///

DURRELL A. PUCKETT,

 Plaintiff,

v.

K. BRANDON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00290-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[ECF Nos. 16, 19]

Case 1:14-cv-00290-SAB Document 24 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on December 22, 2014 is adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 9, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00290-SAB Document 24 Filed 02/09/15 Page 2 of 2