Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01475/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01475-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628

Special Assistant United States Attorney

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8956

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

ROBERT P. DOVE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ANDREW SAUL, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01475-CKD

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO 

SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C.

§ 405(g) AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel of record, that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for 

further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 

42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four.

On remand, the Appeals Council will assign this case to an administrative law judge 

(ALJ) for a new decision. The Appeals Council will instruct the ALJ to conduct a new hearing 

and will give Plaintiff an opportunity to present evidence regarding the calculation of his 

overpayment. The ALJ will take the steps necessary to complete the administrative record and 

provide an explanation for the period for which Plaintiff received the overpayment in disability 

insurance benefits, the cause of the overpayment, and the amount of the overpayment. 

Case 2:19-cv-01475-CKD Document 17 Filed 02/21/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Thereafter, the ALJ will make findings and decide whether Plaintiff was without fault in 

causing or accepting the overpayment and whether recovery of the overpayment may be waived.

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final 

judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the 

Commissioner.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: February 19, 2020 CERNEY KREUZE & LOTT, LLP

s/ Shellie Lott by C.Chen* 

(As authorized by email on 2/19/2020)

SHELLIE LOTT

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Date: February 19, 2020 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

 By s/ Carolyn B. Chen 

CAROLYN B. CHEN

Special Assistant U. S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 21, 2020

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:19-cv-01475-CKD Document 17 Filed 02/21/20 Page 2 of 2