Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02204/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-02204-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Teimuraz Tsirekidze et al, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Syntax-Brillian Corp. et al, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-2204-PHX-FJM

ORDER

Final judgment entered in this case nearly seven years ago back in 2010. See docs. 377

and 378. We have been presented with voluminous filings by pro se Ahmed Amr which do

not conform to the rules of court. We have before us a thick document which the clerk has

characterized as a Notice (doc. 383), a motion to disqualify lead plaintiff (doc. 384),

plaintiff’s response to the motion (doc. 385), Amr’s reply (doc. 386), and another document

characterized by the clerk as a Notice (doc. 387). 

The motion to disqualify lead plaintiff is not a proper post judgment motion. Even if we

were to construe it as a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60, Fed. R. Civ. P., it

comes too late. A motion under Rule 60(b)(1), (2), and (3) must be filed no more than a year

after the entry of judgment. Rule 60(c)(1). And all other motions under Rule 60 must be

made within “a reasonable time.” Id. The final judgment in this case is almost seven years

old. Six to seven years is not reasonable under any circumstance. 

Case 2:07-cv-02204-FJM Document 388 Filed 10/26/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

- 2 -

For these reasons, it is ORDERED DENYING the motion to disqualify lead plaintiff.

(Doc. 384). 

This case is over, closed and terminated. There should be no further filings in it. Any

future relief, if any, would have to be by independent action. Rule 60(d), Fed. R. Civ. P. We

urge Mr. Amr to seek the advice of counsel. 

DATED this 26th day of October, 2016.

Case 2:07-cv-02204-FJM Document 388 Filed 10/26/16 Page 2 of 2