Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02934/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02934-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 MOTION, STIPULATION, AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 

FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE -1-

SIDNEY J. COHEN, ESQ., State Bar No. 39023

SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

427 Grand Avenue

Oakland, CA 94610

Telephone: (510) 893-6682

Facsimile: (510) 893-9450

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HOLLYNN DELIL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOLLYNN DELIL

Plaintiff,

v.

MARIG0LD, LLC; and DOES 1-

25, Inclusive, 

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. C 09-02934 JSW

Civil Rights

MOTION, STIPULATION, AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR

CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Paragraph 7 of General 

Order 56, And Local Civil Rule 7-11

MOTION AND STIPULATION

Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record,

file this “MOTION, STIPULATION, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,” 

and stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff brought this action against defendant alleging violations

of Title III of the Americans With Disabilities Act and related state statutes and

regulations. Accordingly, this case is governed by the procedures of General

Order 56.

2. The parties have complied with the requirements of paragraphs 1

through 6 of General Order 56.

3. On February 10, 2010, the parties held a mediation conducted by

ADR appointed mediator Kerry M. Gough .

Case 3:09-cv-02934-JSW Document 14 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-02934-JSW Document13 Filed02/19/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 MOTION, STIPULATION, AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 

FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE -2-

4. The case did not settle, and on February 17, 2010 Mr. Gough 

e filed his “Certification of ADR Session” reporting that the mediation process is

concluded. (see Docket No. 12)

5. Because the case has not resolved at mediation, Plaintiff and

Defendant file this Motion For Administrative Relief requesting a Case

Management Conference pursuant to the requirement of paragraph 7 of General

Order 56 and request that the court schedule a Case Management Conference.

It is so Stipulated:

Date: 2/19/10 SIDNEY J. COHEN

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

/s/ Sidney J. Cohen

 

Sidney J. Cohen

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Date: 2/19/10 AARON & WILSON LLP 

 

Robert S. Aaron

 

Robert S. Aaron

Attorney for Defendant Marigold

LLC

ORDER

Having considered the parties’ Motion and Stipulation, and for 

good cause shown, the court sets a case management conference for 1:30 P.M. on 

Friday,_______________. The parties shall e file a joint case management 

statement by no later than ________________.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: _____________________________

 Jeffrey S. White

 United States District Judge 

Case3:09-cv-02934-JSW Document13 Filed02/19/10 Page2 of 2

April 2, 2010 March 26, 2010 February 23, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-02934-JSW Document 14 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 2