Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03633/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03633-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

________________________________________ - 1 - 

Frausto v. California Highway Patrol, et al. – Stipulation and Proposed Order for an Extension on All Expert Discovery 

Deadlines and the Deadline for Hearing on Dispositive Motions 

Bracamontes & Vlasak 

A Professional Law Corporation 

www.bvlawsf.com 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Michael R. Bracamontes (SBN 242655) 

Michael A. Schreiber (SBN 271611) 

BRACAMONTES & VLASAK, P.C. 

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 870 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Phone: (415) 835-6777 

Fax: (415) 835-6780 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Yolanda Frausto 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

YOLANDA FRAUSTO individually and as 

successor in interest to the Estate of Decedent 

John Anthony Cornejo;

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL,

ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

KEVIN BEYRODT, NORMAN D. CORNEJO 

II, AARON INNS, ANTHONY FIELDS, IAN 

STEWART, K. EASLING, AND CAMERON 

TRACY, and DOES 6 to 30, inclusive , 

Defendants. 

_______________________________________ 

RELATED ACTIONS 

CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-00311-RS AND 

RELATED ACTIONS, CASE NO. 3:16-CV00974-RS, CASE NO. 16-CV-03633-RS, 

CASE NO. 16-CV-03833-RS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR AN EXTENSION ON ALL EXPERT 

DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND DEADLINE 

FOR HEARING ON DISPOSITIVE 

MOTIONS

Case 3:16-cv-03633-RS Document 33 Filed 12/07/16 Page 1 of 3
 ________________________________________ - 2 - 

Frausto v. California Highway Patrol, et al. – Stipulation and Proposed Order for an Extension on All Expert Discovery 

Deadlines and the Deadline for Hearing on Dispositive Motions 

Bracamontes & Vlasak 

A Professional Law Corporation 

www.bvlawsf.com 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties submit the following Joint Stipulation and request that the Court grant a two week 

extension concerning all expert discovery deadlines including expert disclosures, expert reports, and 

expert depositions. Due to scheduling conflicts, the parties do not have enough time to take the 

deposition of experts necessary for this case. This request will also extend the deadline that dispositive 

motions are to be heard by two weeks. 

Therefore, the parties stipulate and request that the Court grant a two week extension for all expert 

discovery deadlines and the deadline for hearing on dispositive motions. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES: 

Dated: 12/6/16 By: /s/ Michael Bracamontes 

Michael Bracamontes, Esq.1

Michael A. Schreiber, Esq. 

BRACAMONTES & VLASAK, P.C. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: 12/6/16 By: /s/ Craig Modlin 

Craig Modlin, Esq. 

Deputy Attorney General 

Attorney for Defendants California Highway Patrol 

& M. Diehl, Z. Trzesniewski, H. Schultz, 

C. Bruno, D. Hazelwood, and J. Koven 

Dated: 12/6/16 By: /s/ Gregory B. Thomas 

Gregory B. Thomas, Esq. 

BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 

Attorney for Defendants County of Alameda and 

Kevin Beyrodt, Aaron Inns, Anthoney Fields, Ian 

Stewart, Karen Easling & Cameron Tracy 

Dated: 12/6/16 By: /s/ Nikolau W. Reed 

Nikolaus W. Reed, Esq. 

LAW OFFICES OF NIKOLAUS W. REED 

Attorney for Plaintiff Norman Cornejo 

Dated: 12/6/16 By: /s/ Logan Quirk 

Logan Quirk, Esq. 

QUIRK LAW GROUP 

Attorney for Plaintiff Norman Cornejo. 

 

1

 As the filer of this stipulation, I, Michael Bracamontes attest that Craig Modlin, Gregory B. Thomas, Nikolaus W. Reed and Logan Quirk 

concur in the content of the Stipulation and have authorized its filing. 

Case 3:16-cv-03633-RS Document 33 Filed 12/07/16 Page 2 of 3
 ________________________________________ - 3 - 

Frausto v. California Highway Patrol, et al. – Stipulation and Proposed Order for an Extension on All Expert Discovery 

Deadlines and the Deadline for Hearing on Dispositive Motions 

Bracamontes & Vlasak 

A Professional Law Corporation 

www.bvlawsf.com 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation and request 

that the Court grant a two week extension concerning all expert discovery deadlines and the deadline 

for hearing on dispositive motions is GRANTED. 

Dated: ______________________________ 

 Richard Seeborg 

 Northern District Court Judge 

12/7/16

Case 3:16-cv-03633-RS Document 33 Filed 12/07/16 Page 3 of 3