Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05718/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05718-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

KLEIN, 

O’NEILL & 

SINGH, LLP 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 07-05718 JL 

SANG N. DANG (NO. 214558) 

sdang@koslaw.com 

KLEIN, O’NEILL & SINGH, LLP 

43 Corporate Park 

Suite 204 

Irvine, CA 92606 

Telephone: 949-955-1920 

Facsimile: 949-955-1921 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PLUSTEK INC. 

YUNG MING CHOU (NO. 172118) 

Chouyung@aol.com 

39111 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite 207 

Fremont, CA 94538 

Telephone: 510-713-8698 

Facsimile: 510-713-8690 

Attorney for Defendant 

SYSCAN, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PLUSTEK INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

SYSCAN, INC. 

Defendant.

Case No. C 07-05718 JL 

STIPULATION REGARDING CASE 

SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case 3:07-cv-05718-JL Document 47 Filed 01/11/10 Page 1 of 4 Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document45 Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 5
KLEIN, 

O’NEILL & 

SINGH, LLP 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION REGARDING CASE 

SCHEDULE Case No. C 07-05718 JL 

1

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2007, Plaintiff Plustek Inc. (“Plustek”) filed an 

action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Defendant 

Syscan, Inc. (“Plustek”), requesting, inter alia, for a declaratory judgment that Plustek does not 

infringe any claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,705,124 (the “‘124 Patent”), and that the ‘124 Patent is 

invalid.

WHEREAS, the Court issued a Claim Construction Order on December 21, 2009 

(Docket No. 44), and ordered the Parties to submit a proposed schedule for further proceedings. 

WHEREAS, through their respective counsel of record, the Parties have met and 

conferred to discuss the case schedule. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, 

hereby stipulate and respectfully request the Court to order the case schedule as follows: 

PLEADING OR EVENT DATE 

The Parties’ respective Amended Infringement 

Contentions and Amended Invalidity 

Contentions (Patent L.R. 3-6) 

January 20, 2010 (subject to the order of the 

Court upon a timely showing of good cause) 

The Parties’ respective Advice of Counsel 

(Patent L.R. 3-7) 

February 9, 2010 

Close of fact discovery re merits of claims and 

defenses

March 31, 2010 

Initial Expert Reports on issues on which party 

bears the burden of proof at trial 

May 10, 2010 

Rebuttal Expert Reports June 9, 2010 

Close of Expert Discovery August 5, 2010 

Dispositive Motions and Motions to Bifurcate 

Trial (last day to file) 

August 26, 2010 

Case 3:07-cv-05718-JL Document 47 Filed 01/11/10 Page 2 of 4 Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document45 Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 5
KLEIN, 

O’NEILL & 

SINGH, LLP 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION REGARDING CASE 

SCHEDULE Case No. C 07-05718 JL 

2

Oppositions to Dispositive Motions and 

Motions to Bifurcate Trial 

September 9, 2010 

Replies to Dispositive Motions and Motions to 

Bifurcate Trial 

September 16, 2010 

Completion and Filing of Pretrial Order TBD

Final Pretrial Conference TBD

Trial TBD

DATED: December 30, 2009 

By /s/ Yung Ming Chou 

Yung Ming Chou 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SYSCAN, INC. 

DATED: December 30, 2009 KLEIN, O’NEILL & SINGH, LLP 

By /s/ Sang N. Dang 

Sang N. Dang 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PLUSTEK INC. 

Case 3:07-cv-05718-JL Document 47 Filed 01/11/10 Page 3 of 4 Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document45 Filed12/30/09 Page3 of 5
KLEIN, 

O’NEILL & 

SINGH, LLP 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION REGARDING CASE 

SCHEDULE Case No. C 07-05718 JL 

3

[PROPOSED] ORDER

It is so ORDERED.

DATED: _____________________ _____________________________________ 

 U.S. CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document45 Filed12/30/09 Page4 of 5

January 11, 2010

Case 3:07-cv-05718-JL Document 47 Filed 01/11/10 Page 4 of 4