Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07170/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07170-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. C06-07170-MEJ

Fred W. Schwinn (SBN 225575)

CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC.

12 South First Street, Suite 416

San Jose, California 95113-2404

Telephone Number: (408) 294-6100

Facsimile Number: (408) 294-6190

Email Address: fred.schwinn@sjconsumerlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

SUSAN RAE OWENS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUSAN RAE OWENS,

Plaintiff,

v.

ESKANOS & ADLER, A PROFESSIONAL

CORPORATION, a California corporation,

and DONALD ROGERS STEBBINS,

individually and in his official capacity,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-07170-MEJ

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiff, SUSAN RAE OWENS, and Defendants,

ESKANOS & ADLER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, and DONALD ROGERS

STEBBINS, stipulate, and the Court hereby orders, as follows:

1. The dispute between the parties has been settled, therefore, the claims asserted

by Plaintiff, SUSAN RAE OWENS, against Defendants, ESKANOS & ADLER, A

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, and DONALD ROGERS STEBBINS, in the above-captioned

proceeding are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:06-cv-07170-MHP Document 12 Filed 02/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. C06-07170-MEJ

Dated: January 5, 2007 /s/ Fred W. Schwinn

Fred W. Schwinn, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff

SUSAN RAE OWENS

Dated: January 5, 2007 /s/ Andrew M. Steinheimer

Andrew M. Steinheimer

Attorney for Defendants

ESKANOS & ADLER, A

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION,

and DONALD ROGERS

STEBBINS

THE FOREGOING STIPULATION

IS APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

The Honorable Maria-Elena James

United States Magistrate Judge

2/22/2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-07170-MHP Document 12 Filed 02/27/07 Page 2 of 2