Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01091/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01091-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:5(a) Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

Stuckey v. U.S.A. Trucking, Inc. CAND Case No. 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-DAD 

Stipulation to Extend Deadlines and [Proposed] Order For: Discovery Cut-Off, Dispositive Motions, Pre-Trial 

Conference and Trial. 

Rory C. Quintana, SBN 258747 

QUINTANA HANAFI 

PUNGPRAKEARTI, LLP 

201 Spear St., Suite 1100 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

(415) 504.3121 (Tel.) 

(415) 233-8770 (Fax) 

rory@qhplaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Virgil Stuckey 

YULI LAW OFFICES 

Yuli Kaplunovsky (SBN 299178) 

1669-2 Hollenbeck Ave. # 211 

Sunnyvale, California 94087 

Telephone: (408) 309-4506 

E-Mail: yk@yulilaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants USA Trucking, Inc. 

and Gurtej Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

VIRGIL STUCKEY, an individual; 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

U.S.A. TRUCKING, INC., a California 

corporation; GURTEJ SINGH, an individual, 

and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-DAD

STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

DEADLINES AND ORDER FOR: 

DISCOVERY CUT-OFF, 

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, AND TRIAL 

DATE 

(AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT) 

 Pursuant to the Parties’ agreement of September 10, 2015, and for the reasons described 

below, as well as an effort to continue good faith and ongoing efforts toward informal resolution, 

Case 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-CKD Document 38 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Stuckey v. U.S.A. Trucking, Inc. CAND Case No. 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-DAD 

Stipulation to Extend Deadlines and [Proposed] Order For: Discovery Cut-Off, Dispositive Motions, Pre-Trial 

Conference and Trial. 

the parties’ hereby agree to continue the deadlines set forth for Discovery, Motions, the Pre-Trial 

Conference and Trial as described below. 

 On September 11, 2015, Defendant failed to respond to Plaintiff’s second set of 

discovery. Defendant failed to provide responses to discovery. On October 9, 2015, the Court 

granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel responses to Plaintiff’s Second Set of Discovery. Plaintiff 

must receive this discovery in order to complete the depositions of Mr. Singh and the new 

witnesses that Mr. Singh has only recently disclosed as a part of the meet and confer process. 

The Court has required Defendant to provide responses by October 23, 2015. Discovery is 

currently set to close on November 6, 2015. If Defendant waits until the last day to provide 

responses, Plaintiff will only have two weeks to complete all necessary depositions. To date, 

Defendant has still not provided Discovery responses. 

In addition to the issues related to Defendant’s failure to participate in the discovery 

process, Plaintiff’s mother passed away on October 11, 2015 and Plaintiff has requested time to 

mourn the loss of his mother. Additionally, Plaintiff’s counsel has also had a personal family 

emergency which has required him to be in Nashville, Tennessee since October 14, 2015 and 

will keep him in Nashville through the immediate future. 

 Based on these facts and ongoing discovery issues related in part to the withdrawal of 

Defendants’ prior counsel, the Parties have agreed to continue the deadlines set forth for 

Discovery, Motions, the Pre-Trial Conference and Trial as follows: (1) the Discovery Deadline, 

currently set for November 6, 2015, will be extended to February 22, 2016; (2) Dispositive 

Motions Deadline, currently set for November 20, 2015 will be extended to March 8, 2016 and 

the Dispositive Motion hearings, currently set for notice on December 10 2015 at 9:30 a.m. will 

be set for April 5, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. ; (3) the Pre-Trial Conference, currently set for February 12, 

2016 at 11:00 a.m. will be extended to May 13, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. , with joint pretrial 

statements, currently due by January 29, 2016, due on May 6, 2016; (4) the Jury Trial, currently 

set for March 14, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. will be extended to June 13, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. 

Case 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-CKD Document 38 Filed 10/20/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

Stuckey v. U.S.A. Trucking, Inc. CAND Case No. 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-DAD 

Stipulation to Extend Deadlines and [Proposed] Order For: Discovery Cut-Off, Dispositive Motions, Pre-Trial 

Conference and Trial. 

 The parties respectfully request the Court enter an order that current deadlines listed 

above be extended as agreed to by the parties. 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants agreed to the above scheduling changes following 

the hearing for Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel on October 9, 2015; 

 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants 

through their designated counsel that the above scheduling changes be granted and entered by the 

Court. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 19, 2015 QUINTANA HANAFI 

PUNGPRAKEARTI, LLP 

By: __/s/Rory C. Quintana_____________ 

 Rory C. Quintana 

Attorney for Plaintiff Virgil Stuckey 

Dated: October 19, 2015 YULI LAW OFFICES 

By: __/s/Yuli Kaplunovsky_____________ 

 Yuli Kaplunovsky 

Attorney for Defendants Gurtej Singh 

and U.S.A. Trucking, Inc. 

Filer’s Attestation: I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the 

document has been obtained from its signatory. 

By: __/s/Rory C. Quintana_____________ 

 Rory C. Quintana 

Case 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-CKD Document 38 Filed 10/20/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 4 -

Stuckey v. U.S.A. Trucking, Inc. CAND Case No. 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-DAD 

Stipulation to Extend Deadlines and [Proposed] Order For: Discovery Cut-Off, Dispositive Motions, Pre-Trial 

Conference and Trial. 

 The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing 

therefore, orders modifications as provided above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: 10/20/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Case 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-CKD Document 38 Filed 10/20/15 Page 4 of 4