Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_07-cv-00535/USCOURTS-almd-2_07-cv-00535-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 540
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ELIJAH COLEMAN, #250 079, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv535-ID

)

STEPHEN F. BOUDREAU, M.D., )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On July 31, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case. (Doc.

No. 5.) Plaintiff Elijah Coleman filed objections on August 13, 2007. (Doc. No. 7.) The

court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which

Plaintiff objects and has independently reviewed the file in this case. Upon careful

CONSIDERATION, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s objections be and the same are hereby OVERRULED;

2. the Recommendation be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and

AFFIRMED;

3. Plaintiff’s claims challenging events which occurred in January 2005 be and

the same are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), as Plaintiff failed to file the complaint with regard

to these allegations within the time prescribed by the applicable period of

limitation;

Case 2:07-cv-00535-ID-SRW Document 8 Filed 10/16/07 Page 1 of 2
2

4. the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Judge Burt Smithart, Paul Brunson, Jr.,

Ben Reeves, Jr., be and the same are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in

accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and/or (iii);

5. Plaintiff’s perjury and property claims and his request to press criminal

charges be and the same are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);

6. Plaintiff’s challenge to the constitutionality of the conviction and sentence

imposed upon him by the Circuit Court for Bullock County, Alabama be and

the same are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions

of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), as such claims are not properly before the

court at this time; and

7. this complaint be and the same is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of

process.

DONE this 16th day of October, 2007.

 /s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:07-cv-00535-ID-SRW Document 8 Filed 10/16/07 Page 2 of 2