Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01819/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01819-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JENNIFER PETERSON, )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner )

of Social Security, )

)

)

Defendant. )

 )

1:07cv1819 OWW DLB

ORDER VACATING ORDER 

TO SHOW CAUSE

(Document 11)

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

RESERVE COMPLAINT

On December 12, 2007, Plaintiff, proceeding in forma pauperis, filed the present action

for judicial review of the denial of Social Security benefits. 

After numerous questions as to the status of service of the complaint, the Court issued an

order to show cause to Defendant why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to lodge the

administrative record. The Court explained that service appeared proper. 

However, after further review of the proof of service submitted by Plaintiff on August 14,

2008, it appears that Defendant was NOT properly served. The correct address for the Civil

Process Clerk of the United States Attorney’s Office is 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401, Fresno,

California, 93721. The proof of service shows that Defendant was served at Suite 1501. 

Accordingly, the order to show cause issued to Defendant on August 28, 2008, is

VACATED. 

Case 1:07-cv-01819-DLB Document 13 Filed 09/03/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff is ORDERED to reserve the complaint with thirty (30) days of service of this

order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff is

also urged to take a more proactive approach to this action. Had the Court not taken the initiative

to question service, more than six months after the last filing, the action would likely have

continued without activity. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 2, 2008 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01819-DLB Document 13 Filed 09/03/08 Page 2 of 2