Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_05-cv-02614/USCOURTS-azd-3_05-cv-02614-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1The present motion was filed with the Court on May 30, 2006. According to Local Rule

of Civil Procedure 7.2(c), if the Defendants opposed the Plaintiffs' motion they were required to file

a responsive memorandum with the Court within ten (10) days after service. However, the

Defendants failed to file a response opposing the Plaintiffs motion nor did they request an extension

from the Court enabling them to file a delayed response. 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Audibel, a Division of Starkey ) No. CV 05-2614-PCT-PGR

Laboratories, Inc., and Starkey )

Laboratories, Inc., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

vs. ) ORDER

)

)

)

David J. Borland, Jr., et al. )

Defendants. )

____________________________)

 Pursuant to the Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Responses to Outstanding Discovery

Requests (Doc. 19), and good cause appearing,1

IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Responses to Outstanding

Discovery Requests (Doc. 19) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to all outstanding

discovery within ten (10) days of the date of this Order.

Case 3:05-cv-02614-PGR Document 20 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

DATED this 26th day of June, 2006.

Case 3:05-cv-02614-PGR Document 20 Filed 06/27/06 Page 2 of 2