Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02729/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02729-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BADER,

 Petitioner,

 v.

 DIETZ ET AL,

Respondents. /

No. C05-02729 MJJ

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Court has received no opposition or statement of non-opposition from Respondents to

Petitioner's Motion To Remand (Docket No. 14), which is scheduled for hearing on February 28,

2006. Under the Civil Local Rules, the opposition was due three weeks before the hearing date. 

This hearing is hereby VACATED.

Respondents are hereby ORDERED to show good cause in writing, by February 20, 2006,

why no opposition or statement of non-opposition has been filed to date, and why any tardy filing

should be considered at this point given the guidelines of the Local Rules, as well as the Court’s

Standing Order for civil cases. 

Case 3:05-cv-02729-MJJ Document 16 Filed 02/16/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Respondents should file their opposition or statement of non-opposition with their response

to this order to show cause, and Petitioner may file a reply, due one week later. Failure to respond to

this order shall result in the imposition of sanctions, which may include granting the motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16, 2006 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-02729-MJJ Document 16 Filed 02/16/06 Page 2 of 2