Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03570/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03570-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITY SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION

Plaintiff(s), No. C 06-3570 PJH

v. ORDER REINSTATING 

PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

JEFFRY A. KELBER,

Defendant(s).

_______________________________/

The parties submitted a stipulation and proposed order to vacate all pretrial and trial

dates in view of continuing settlement negotiations. The proposed order was presented to

and signed by Magistrate Judge Larson, to whom this matter had been referred for a

settlement conference. The order should have, however, been presented to the

undersigned judge on whose docket this case resides for trial. It is not the practice of this

court to vacate pretrial dates simply because of settlement negotiations. Accordingly, the

prior pretrial schedule is reinstated. The court expects that if the case is not resolved,

pretrial papers will be filed in a timely manner for the July 10, 2008 pretrial conference. The

parties are relieved temporarily of the requirement to attend a settlement conference. 

However, if no final settlement is reached by May 31, 2008, Magistrate Judge Larson is

requested to reschedule a conference for June 2008 and the parties are ORDERED to

appear.

Pretrial and trial dates will be vacated upon the court’s receipt of a stipulation for

dismissal or other appropriate closing document.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 26, 2008 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-03570-PJH Document 67 Filed 03/26/08 Page 1 of 1