Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00656/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00656-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIXTO CRUIZ MURILLO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

JUDGE RONALD COULARD, et al., ) 

 )

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:12-cv—00656-SKO-HC

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

REQUEST FOR COPIES (Doc. 20)

INFORMATIONAL ORDER REGARDING

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND TERMINATION

OF THE ACTION (Docs. 18-19)

Petitioner is a state prisoner who proceeded pro se and in

forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 23, 2012, the Court dismissed the

first amended petition and declined to issue a certificate of

appealability. On the same date, judgment was entered, and the

judgment and order of dismissal were served on Petitioner by

mail. On October 1, 2012, in response to what appeared to be

Petitioner’s attempt to file an amended petition, this Court sent

Petitioner an informational order explaining that the case had

been terminated and that the Court would not continue to process

Petitioner’s filings. 

1

Case 1:12-cv-00656-SKO Document 22 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On December 27, 2012, Petitioner filed what purported to be

a request for copies of all Petitioner’s prior transactions with

this Court, despite this Court’s having previously stated that

Petitioner’s filings would not be processed.

Petitioner’s request for copies is DENIED. This Court does

not provide free copies of documents, and in forma pauperis

status does not include the cost of copies.

Petitioner is further INFORMED that the Court will not

continue to process his filings in the action in this Court

because judgment has been entered and the case terminated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:12-cv-00656-SKO Document 22 Filed 01/07/13 Page 2 of 2