Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00972/USCOURTS-casd-3_17-cv-00972-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 540
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

---

1

3:17-cv-00972-BEN-BLM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOMINGOS JOSE RAMOS OLIVEIRA,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY - IMMIGRATION AND 

CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,

Respondent.

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00972-BEN-BLM

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS 

CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Petitioner Domingos Jose Ramos Oliveira has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Docket No. 1.) In short, Petitioner’s petition ask 

the Court to order his release at a more reasonable amount of bond1 pending the results of 

his removal proceedings. 

The Court takes judicial notice that, on January 31, 2018, while Petitioner’s 

petition was pending, the Immigration Judge set his bond to $50,000. (Docket No. 6-1 at 

p. 2, January 31, 2018 Order of the Immigration Judge With Respect to Custody.) The 

Court also takes judicial notice that as of March 2, 2018, Petitioner’s bond had been paid 

 

1 According to Petitioner’s petition, the Immigration Judge set his bond at 

$250,000.

Case 3:17-cv-00972-BEN-BLM Document 7 Filed 04/25/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

3:17-cv-00972-BEN-BLM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and Petitioner was released pending the final decision in his exclusion/deportation 

hearing. (Docket No. 6-1 at p. 3, Notice of Release and Proof of Service.)

As a result, Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition is moot because it does not 

appear there are any “remaining ‘collateral conseconsequence[s]’ that may be redressed 

by success on the petition.”2 Abdala v. I.N.S., 488 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir. 2007)

(quoting Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998)). Therefore, Petitioner’s petition is

denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 25, 2018

 

2 To the extent Petitioner’s petition seeks relief for “improper treatment” at his 

detention facility (Petition at pp. 6-7), 28 U.S.C. § 2241 does not authorize such relief.

Case 3:17-cv-00972-BEN-BLM Document 7 Filed 04/25/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2