Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07671/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07671-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7671

KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

UHURU SEKOU OBATAIYE-ALLAH,

Plaintiff,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARK, Director, DOC; GERALD K. WASHINGTON, 

Regional Director; R. MATHENA, Warden; JOHN WALRATH, 

Assistant Warden; SHORTRIDGE, Operations Officer; J. 

GALLIHAR, Major; J. MCQUEEN, Investigator; CCS, Central 

Classification Services; SWINNEY, Unit Manager; KILBOURNE, 

Unit Manager; SERGEANT HALL, Sergeant; SERGEANT INGLE; L. T. 

MULLINS, Lieutenant; PAYNE, Lieutenant; J. MESSER, Grievance 

Coordinator; R. MULLINS, Grievance Coordinator; J. OWENS, 

Property; VANOVER, Property; I.H.O. L. MULLINS, Hearings 

Officer; SERGEANT SYKES, Sergeant; C/O R. BROWN; C/O 

VANOVER; C/O CARTER; C/O MESSER; C/O OFFICER MESSER; C/O 

SHEPPARD; C/O DUPIE; C/O SLUSS; C/O AKERS; C/O GIBSON; 

JOHN DOES; JANE DOES; L. T. LAMBERT, Lieutenant; LIEUTENANT 

BLEVINS; LIEUTENANT LYLE; SERGEANT HILL; YOUNCE, Unit 

Manager; SERGEANT BARTON; SERGEANT MILLER,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief

District Judge. (7:14-cv-00257-GEC)

Submitted: April 13, 2015 Decided: April 22, 2015

Appeal: 14-7671 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7671 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders

(1) dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action without 

prejudice for failure to comply with a court order; and (2) 

denying his motions for reconsideration and appointment of 

counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Snodgrass v. Clark, No. 7:14-cv-00257-GEC (W.D. 

Va. July 1 & Aug. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-7671 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/22/2015 Pg: 3 of 3