Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04491/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04491-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND WELFARE 

TRUST FUND, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

M&J FLOORCOVERING, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-04491-JD 

ORDER DENYING MOTION RE WRIT 

OF EXECUTION

Re: Dkt. No. 34

On March 2, 2016, defendant M&J Floorcovering, Inc. (“M&J”) asked under Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 60(b) to void a writ of execution issued by the Clerk of Court on February 8, 

2016 in the amount of $19,808.27. Dkt. Nos. 29, 34. M&J also seeks a declaration that the 

judgment is satisfied and sanctions against plaintiff’s attorneys. 

On April 29, 2016, the United States Marshal filed a return on execution, attesting that the 

writ had been wholly satisfied. Dkt. No. 44. On May 2, 2016, plaintiff’s attorney filed a 

declaration affirming that the writ of execution was returned satisfied. Dkt. No. 43. M&J has not

challenged these representations, and so the Court denies the motion to void the writ of execution 

as moot. Defendant’s request for sanctions is denied for lack of good cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2016

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-04491-JD Document 46 Filed 06/09/16 Page 1 of 1