Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00829/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00829-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. C05 00829 JW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING 

PA/52194579.1/3003187- 0000313787PA/52194562.1/3003187- 0000313787

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

WENDY M. LAZERSON (SBN 97285) 

CAROLYN B. HALL (SBN 212311) 

1900 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2223 

Telephone: (650) 849-4400 

Facsimile: (650) 849-4800 

Attorneys for Defendants 

BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC. 

and GEORGE WESTON BAKERIES, INC. 

IRA SPIRO (SBN 67641) 

DENNIS F. MOSS (SBN 77512) 

Spiro Moss Barness and Barge LLP 

11377 W. Olympic Blvd., Fifth Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90064 

Telephone: (310) 235-2468 

Facsimile: (310) 235-2456 

E-mail:ispiro@smbhblaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION 

THOMAS LEONARD, CHARLIE BRADARIC, 

GARY HOSKINS, LARRY BRIAN NEWMAN, 

JR., CHRIS HERR, and WILLIAM F. 

HARRISON, each of them individually, and on 

behalf of: all others similarly situated, the general 

public, and similarly situated current and former 

employees of Defendants., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC., BESTFOODS 

BAKING COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 10, 

Defendants. 

No. C05 00829 JW (HRL) 

CLASS ACTION AND FLSA 

COLLECTIVE ACTION 

Assigned to the Honorable James Ware 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING 

Complaint filed: February 25, 2005 

---------------

-------------

Case 5:05-cv-00829-JW Document 190 Filed 01/10/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 Case No. C05 00829 JW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING

PA/52194579.1/3003187- 0000313787PA/52194562.1/3003187- 0000313787

Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiffs Thomas 

Leonard et al. and Defendants Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. and George Weston Bakeries, Inc. 

(together, “the Parties”), respectfully request that the Court permit the Parties to continue the 

hearing date for the Parties’ motions for summary judgment, currently calendared for March 5, 

2007, by one week, to March 12, 2007. The Parties request that the Court grant the foregoing 

continuance for the following reasons: 

1. Plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel further responses to Plaintiffs’ First 

Requests for Admission and an accompanying motion for attorneys’ fees. These motions are 

currently set for hearing tomorrow, January 9, 2007. Defendants have filed a motion for 

attorneys’ fees incurred in opposing Plaintiffs’ motion to compel. This motion is currently set 

for hearing on January 23, 2007. However, the Parties believe that they will be able to resolve 

the issues raised in Plaintiffs’ motion to compel (and the companion attorneys’ fees motions) if 

they have an additional opportunity to meet and confer. The Parties conferred by telephone this 

morning, January 8, 2007, and expressed agreement that such a resolution is likely possible and 

would be beneficial for all parties. However, because Plaintiffs’ lead attorney is unavailable to 

meet and confer today due to illness, the Parties require a short continuance of the hearing date to 

afford them time to meet and confer. Accordingly, the Parties have stipulated and sought a 

proposed order (from Judge Lloyd) continuing the hearing date for Plaintiffs’ motion to compel 

and motion for attorneys’ fees by one week, to January 16, 2007, and continuing the hearing date 

for Defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees by one week, to January 30, 2007. If the Parties are 

able to resolve the outstanding issues for the motion to compel, as they anticipate is likely, the 

Parties will promptly request that the hearing on the motion to compel and the companion 

attorneys’ fees motions be taken off calendar. Declaration of Carolyn Hall, filed pursuant to 

Civil Local Rule 6-12 (“Hall Decl.”), ¶ 2. 

2. The effect of continuing the hearing date for Plaintiffs’ motion to compel 

would be that the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion to compel would not take place until January 16, 

2007, the same date that is currently set for the filing of the Parties’ motions for summary 

-------------

Case 5:05-cv-00829-JW Document 190 Filed 01/10/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 Case No. C05 00829 JW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING

PA/52194579.1/3003187- 0000313787PA/52194562.1/3003187- 0000313787

judgment. Because Plaintiffs wish to include information at issue in the motion to compel in 

their motion for summary judgment, if the motion to compel hearing is continued by one week, a 

corresponding one-week continuance of the summary judgment filing deadline is necessary. 

Accordingly, the Parties request an order continuing the hearing date for the parties’ motions for 

summary judgment by one week, to March 12, 2007. If such a continuance is granted, the 

Parties’ stipulated briefing schedule will also be continued by one week, so that motions for 

summary judgment must be filed by January 23, 2007, oppositions must be filed by February 13, 

2007, and replies must be filed by February 26, 2007. 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-12, all other previous time modifications and the 

effect that the requested continuance would have on this action are set forth in the accompanying 

Declaration of Carolyn Hall. 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

/ / 

-------------

Case 5:05-cv-00829-JW Document 190 Filed 01/10/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4 Case No. C05 00829 JW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING

PA/52194579.1/3003187- 0000313787PA/52194562.1/3003187- 0000313787

STIPULATION

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Defendants, being all 

parties of record to this action, that, based on the above stated facts and subject to the Court’s 

approval, the Court order as follows: 

1. The hearing date for the Parties’ motions for summary judgment shall be 

continued by one week, to March 12, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. The Parties’ stipulated briefing 

schedule shall also be continued by one week, as follows: motions for summary judgment must 

be filed by January 23, 2007; oppositions must be filed by February 13, 2007; and replies must 

be filed by February 26, 2007. 

DATED: January 8, 2007 Bingham McCutchen LLP 

By: /s/ 

Carolyn B. Hall 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Spiro Moss Barness and Barge LLP 

By: /s/ 

Ira Spiro 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

[Proposed] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

------------ Jan 10 2007 -------------

Case 5:05-cv-00829-JW Document 190 Filed 01/10/07 Page 4 of 4