Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06805/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06805-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

LITTLER MENDELSON°

ARKANSAS

CALIFORNIA

February 25, 2008 Michelle B. Heverly

Direct: 408.795.3406

Direct Fax: 408.288.5686

mheverly@littler.com

VIA MAIL AND E-FILING

Hon. Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, Courtroom G

San Francisco, CA 94102

Re: Hyler et al v. BearingPoint, Inc. Case No. C 06-06805 CW

Dear Judge Zimmerman:

We are in receipt of your Order Amending Court Trial and Pre-trial Order, dated February 7,

2008. I am concerned about the brevity of time between the last date for expert disclosure,

May 30, 2008 and the last date for expert discovery, a week later, of June 6, 2008. We

would like to request an amended date for the close of all expert discovery to allow sufficient

time for supplemental expert disclosure and expert depositions. We would like to suggest

June 19, 2008 for disclosure of supplemental expert witnesses and July 21, 2008 for the close

of expert witness discovery. Please advise us if these dates will work for the court. Thank

you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

COLORADO

CONNECTICUT

MASSACHUSETTS

MINNESOTA

^uduU A</&tf

Michelle B. Heverly

Counsel for Defendant BearingPoint, Inc.

NI-W YORK

NORTH CAROLINA

cc: John Huster, Esq.

Huster Law Group

309 4th Ave., Suite 200

San Francisco, C A 94118

Fax:(415)221-3339

Counsel for Plaintiffs Fletcher Hyler and F. H. Hyler Consulting, LLC

I'F.NNSYl.VANI A

RHODE ISLAND

SOUTH CAROLINA

Firmwide:84378547.1 052466.1005

THF. NATIONA L EMPLOYMEN T & LABO R LA W F I R M ; WASHINGTON

50 West San Fernando Street, 15th Floor, Sanjose, California 95113 Tel: 408.998.4150 Fax: 408.288.5686 www.littler.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

THE PROPOSED SCHEDULE WOULD 

JEOPORDIZE THE TRIAL DATE. THE 

PARTIES ARE FREE TO AGREE TO 

AN EARLIER SCHEDULE.

Case 3:06-cv-06805-BZ Document 47 Filed 02/26/08 Page 1 of 1