Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00410/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00410-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 423
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157
Cause of Action: 28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID R. OLICK,

Plaintiff,

v.

VIVIAN LILY,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-0410 WBS DAD

ORDER

On July 31, 2015, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of plaintiff’s 

motion for discovery sanctions. Attorney David Olick appeared telephonically on his own behalf. 

Attorney Stephen Ruehmann appeared telephonically and attorney William Murray appeared in 

person on behalf of the defendant. 

Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set 

forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. To the extent plaintiff’s motion for discovery sanctions seeks an order striking 

defendant’s answer, plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. No. 15) is denied; and

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:15-cv-00410-WBS-DB Document 28 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. To the extent plaintiff’s motion for discovery sanctions seeks an order requiring 

defendant’s compliance with a prior discovery order, plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. No. 15) is denied as 

untimely and without prejudice to plaintiff seeking an order reopening discovery from the 

assigned District Judge. 

Dated: July 31, 2015

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.civil\olick0410.oah.073115.docx

Case 2:15-cv-00410-WBS-DB Document 28 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 2