Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05233/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-05233-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORENZO ADAMSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-05233-DMR 

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL 

SUBMISSION REGARDING MRS. 

ADAMSON 

Plaintiff does not dispute that Mrs. Adamson was not included on his initial disclosures. At 

the pretrial conference, Plaintiff represented that he did not need to disclose Mrs. Adamson 

through a supplemental disclosure because Defendants were made aware through Plaintiff’s 

deposition testimony that Mrs. Adamson had discoverable information regarding the assistance 

she provided to Plaintiff at home after the subject incident. 

By November 3, 2015, Plaintiff shall file the deposition excerpt(s) that he contends adequately 

disclosed Mrs. Adamson to Defendants, the date of the discovery, and the date that Plaintiff 

became aware that Mrs. Adamson had information relevant to his claims. Plaintiff should also 

explain why Mrs. Adamson was not included in his initial disclosure. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 30, 2015

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:13-cv-05233-DMR Document 137 Filed 10/30/15 Page 1 of 1