Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07592/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07592-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Extend Filing Deadline 1

Laurence F. Padway, #89314

Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway

1516 Oak Street, Suite 109

Alameda, California 94501

Telephone: (510)814-6100

Facsimile : (510)814-0650

Attorneys for plaintiff and

counter-defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ENIKO PRAKASH No. C06-07592 SC BZ

STIPULATION TO EXTEND

Plaintiff, DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE

vs. PLEADING

PULSENT CORPORATION EMPLOYEE

LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendant

_____________________________________/

SUN LIFE FINANCIAL, and SUN LIFE

ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA,

Real Party in Interest

_____________________________________/

By order of February 13, 2008, the court granted defendant’s application for an order

shortening time and directed the Prakashes and Verseon to file their opposition to defendant’s

motion to for an order showing cause why a contempt motion should not issue against Verseon LLC

by noon on February 21, 2008.

Counsel for the Prakashes and Verseon has recently experienced some dental issues

and requires an emergency rot canal which will be performed Wednesday afternoon. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the parties request the Court to extend the date

Case 3:06-cv-07592-SC Document 96 Filed 02/21/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Extend Filing Deadline 2

for the filing of plaintiff’s opposition to defendant’s motion to February 22, 2008 at noon; and

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT defendant may file its reply brief no later

than noon on February 26, 2008.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February 20, 2008 Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway

By: /s/ Laurence F. Padway

 Laurence F. Padway

 Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

 Counter-Defendants

 Eniko Prakash and Adityo Prakash

Dated: February 20, 2008 Barger & Wolen, LLP

By: /s/ Travis R. Wall 

 Travis R. Wall

 Attorneys for Counter-Claimant

 Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

Hon. Samuel Conti

United States Judge

Case 3:06-cv-07592-SC Document 96 Filed 02/21/08 Page 2 of 2