Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05812/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05812-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

04049.51632/3438051.1 Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [xxxx] ORDER SETTING NEW HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS'

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

 Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 

 claudestern@quinnemanuel.com 

 Patrick Doolittle (Bar No. 203659) 

 patrickdoolittle@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE. Ltd 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 

INTERSERVE, INC. dba TECHCRUNCH, a 

Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, 

INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD, a Singapore 

company, 

Defendant. 

 CASE NO. 09-cv-5812 RS 

STIPULATED REQUEST AND 

[xxxxxxxx] ORDER SETTING NEW 

HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' 

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANT'S 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND RELATED 

BRIEFING SCHEDULES 

Dept.: Hon. Richard Seeborg 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction ("PI Motion"); 

WHEREAS, Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss, to Strike, or for a More Definite 

Statement ("Motion to Dismiss"); 

WHEREAS, the Court has set both motions for hearing on May 6, 2010; 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to take certain depositions in advance of the hearing on the PI 

Motion and have presently scheduled such depositions during the week of April 19, 2010; and 

WHEREAS, the parties ask the Court to reset the hearing date for May 13, 2010 with 

opposition briefs due on April 26, 2010 and reply briefs due on May 3, 2010 notwithstanding the 

Local Rules; 

**E-Filed 4/13/10**

Case 3:09-cv-05812-RS Document 64 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

04049.51632/3438051.1 -2- Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS

STIPULATION AND [xxxxxxxx] ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned counsel hereby CONSENT, STIPULATE and 

JOINTLY REQUEST the following pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-7(b): 

1. The hearing on the PI Motion and Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to May 13, 

2010; 

2. Defendant's Opposition to the PI Motion shall be due April 26, 2010 and Plaintiffs' 

Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be due April 26, 2010. 

3. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of their PI Motion shall be due on May 3, 2010 and 

Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss shall be due May 3, 2010. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 12, 2010 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

 By /S/ 

 Patrick C. Doolittle 

Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE., Ltd.

DATED: April 12, 2010 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

 By /S/ 

 Andrew P. Bridges 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Interserve, Inc. d/b/a 

TechCrunch and CrunchPad, Inc. 

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ORDERED. 

 

 

 The Honorable Richard Seeborg 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-05812-RS Document 64 Filed 04/13/10 Page 2 of 2