Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05382/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05382-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DPIX LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

YIELDBOOST TECH, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-05382-JST 

ORDER VACATING HEARING

Re: ECF Nos. 75, 82

On October 26, 2015, the parties filed a Further Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding 

ADR Process. ECF No. 75. The parties stated: “During scheduling of private mediation, counsel 

report that they further met and conferred regarding ADR and believe that an early settlement 

conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet the parties’ needs than 

private mediation.” Id. at 1. The parties further stated: “Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal is 

available on November 30, 2015 and has agreed to host an early settlement conference for the 

parties on that date.” Id. at 1–2.

In light of the parties’ stipulation, the Court hereby vacates the hearing on Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 75, presently scheduled for November 16, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. 

Counsel are ordered to appear in person on November 16, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. to address the parties’ 

Further Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding ADR Process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 29, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-05382-JST Document 83 Filed 10/29/15 Page 1 of 1