Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04063/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04063-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SPIL’S ADMIN. REQUEST TO 

FILE RESPONSE TO TESSERA’S SUPP. FILING RE DEFS’ FAILURE 

TO PRODUCE PRODUCT SAMPLES, NO. C05-04063 CW (EDL) 

KAI TSENG (STATE BAR NO. 193756) (ktseng@orrick.com)

MICHAEL F. HEAFEY (STATE BAR NO. 153499) (mheafey@orrick.com)

HSIANG H. LIN (STATE BAR NO. 241472) (jlin@orrick.com)

ZHENG LIU (STATE BAR NO. 229311) (jenliu@orrick.com)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: 650-614-7400 

Facsimile: 650-614-7401 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. and 

SILICONWARE USA, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

TESSERA, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. C05-04063 CW (EDL) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT SILICONWARE 

PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST 

SEEKING LEAVE TO FILE A 

RESPONSE TO TESSERA’S 

SUPPLEMENTAL FILING REGARDING 

DEFENDANTS’ FAILURE TO 

PRODUCE PRODUCT SAMPLES 

Ctrm: E (15th Floor) 

Magistrate: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 331 Filed 12/01/2006 Page 1 of 2

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 358 Filed 12/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 

- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SPIL’S ADMIN. REQUEST TO 

FILE RESPONSE TO TESSERA’S SUPP. FILING RE DEFS’ FAILURE 

TO PRODUCE PRODUCT SAMPLES, NO. C05-04063 CW (EDL) 

Having considered Defendant Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd.’s Administrative 

Request Seeking Leave to File a Response to Plaintiff Tessera’s Motion Requesting that the Court 

Consider New Evidence in Connection with Tessera’s Motion for Continued Hearing 

(“Administrative Motion”), and good cause appearing therefore, SPIL’s motion for leave to file a 

supplemental response is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ 

The Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte 

Magistrate Judge, United States District Court 

OHS West:260136009.1

Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 331 Filed 12/01/2006 Page 2 of 2

This matter having been referred to a special master for purposes of discovery, and

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

December 21, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 4:05-cv-04063-CW Document 358 Filed 12/21/06 Page 2 of 2