Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01572/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01572-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:15-cv-01572 JCS

J. RUSSELL STEDMAN (SBN 117130)

PETER J. FELSENFELD (SBN 260433)

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

One California Street, 18th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415-362-6000

Facsimile: 415-834-9070

Attorneys for Defendant SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ROBERT REYNARD, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF 

CANADA and KELLY-MOORE PAINT 

HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:15-cv-01572 JCS

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

DEFENDANT SUN LIFE ASSURANCE 

COMPANY OF CANADA'S DEADLINE 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S 

COMPLAINT

Complaint Filed: April 7, 2015

Plaintiff Robert Reynard (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Sun Life Assurance Company of 

Canada (“Sun Life”) (collectively “the Parties”), through their counsel of record stipulate as follows:

RECITALS

1. Plaintiff filed the Complaint initiating this action on August 7, 2015.

2. Sun Life was served with the Summons and Complaint by U.S. Mail post-marked on 

April 8, 2015, such that its deadline to respond to the Complaint is May 11, 2015.

3. Sun Life has asked for additional time to respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff is 

agreeable to the extension.

4. This is the Parties’ first request for an extension of the foregoing deadline. The 

extension will not affect any other scheduled deadlines. The Parties do not anticipate the need for a 

Case 3:15-cv-01572-VC Document 10 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:15-cv-01572 JCS

further extension.

STIPULATION

The Parties hereby stipulate that Sun Life’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is 

extended 14 days; because 14 days from May 11, 2015 is a Sunday, Sun Life's response is due 

Monday, May 26, 2015.

Dated: April 27, 2015

By:

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

/s/ J. Russell Stedman

J. RUSSELL STEDMAN

PETER J. FELSENFELD

Attorneys for Defendant SUN LIFE 

ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA

Dated: April 27, 2015

By:

LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY

/s/ Laurence F. Padway

LAURENCE F. PADWAY

Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT REYNARD

DAted: 4/28/15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:15-cv-01572-VC Document 10 Filed 04/28/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:15-cv-01572 JCS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

ROBERT REYNARD v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA and KELLYMOORE PAINT HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN

3:15-cv-01572 JCS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO:

I am a citizen of the United States and employed in San Francisco, California, at the office of 

a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction this service was made. I am over the age of 18 

and not a party to the within actions; my business address is One California Street, 18th Floor, San 

Francisco, California 94111.

On April 27, 2015, I served the document(s) entitled STIPULATION EXTENDING 

DEFENDANT SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA'S DEADLINE TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, on the interested parties in this action by placing 

true copies thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope(s) addressed as stated below:

Laurence F. Padway

Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway

1516 Oak Street, Suite 109

Oakland, California 94501

☐ (BY MAIL): I deposited such envelope in the mail at San Francisco, California with 

postage fully prepaid. I am readily familiar with this firm's practice of collection and processing 

correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be placed for collection and mailing, and 

deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San 

Francisco, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party served, 

service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 1 day after 

date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

☐ (VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL): I deposited such envelope to be placed for collection and 

handling, via UPS following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business 

practice for collecting and processing correspondence for UPS. On the same day that material is 

placed for collection, it is picked up by UPS at San Francisco, California.

☐ (BY ELECTRONIC MAIL): By transmitting a true copy thereof to the electronic mail 

addresses as indicated below.

☒ (BY CM/ECF SERVICE): I caused such document(s) to be delivered electronically via 

CM/ECF as noted herein.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the above is true 

and correct and was executed on April 27, 2015, at San Francisco, California.

/s/ Sherie McLean

Sherie McLean

Case 3:15-cv-01572-VC Document 10 Filed 04/28/15 Page 3 of 3