Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-05376/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-05376-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND

GUARANTY COMPANY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE SCOTT COMPANIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND

GUARANTY COMPANY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ROBERT NURISSO, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-03-5376 SBA (EMC)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF

HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES, EXPENSES,

AND COSTS

(Docket No. 337)

RELATED TO

No. C-06-5590 EMC

Defendants have moved the Court to continue the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s

fees -- currently scheduled for August 22, 2007 -- because counsel for Defendants is scheduled to be

in a jury trial at that time. Plaintiffs do not oppose a brief continuance, although they request that

the deadlines to file the opposition and reply briefs (i.e., July 25 and August 1, 2007) remain the

same.

Because Defendants have demonstrated good cause for the hearing to be continued and

because Plaintiffs do not object, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion. The hearing on

Plaintiffs’ motion for fees shall be continued to September 12, 2007, at 10:30 a.m. The briefing

Case 4:03-cv-05376-SBA Document 338 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

schedule, however, shall remain the same as requested by Plaintiffs. Defendants have not

demonstrated that their counsel would not be able to prepare an opposition by August 1.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 23, 2007

 EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:03-cv-05376-SBA Document 338 Filed 07/23/07 Page 2 of 2