Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01358/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01358-54/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1145 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES P. DeFAZIO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1358 WBS GGH

vs.

HOLLISTER, INC., et al., ORDER

Defendants. 

 /

Certain plaintiffs have indicated that they desire to file documents which

producing defendants have identified as confidential under the protective order entered on

October 1, 2007. Since that order was entered, the Ninth Circuit decided Pintos v.Pacific

Creditors Ass’n., __F.3d__, 2009 WL 1151800 (9th Cir. April 30, 2009), which required

“compelling reasons” (as opposed to good cause) for sealing, if the sealing was to be performed

in connection with a dispositive motion or trial.

Therefore, no later than May 18, 2009, the filing plaintiffs shall identify for the

producing defendants those specific “confidential” documents which they plan to file in

connection with the motions/opposition to summary judgment. Defendants shall, no later than 

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 502 Filed 05/11/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

May 25, 2009, file and serve the compelling reasons for requiring the “confidential” documents

to be filed under seal. 

Dated: May 11, 2009.

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

_____________________________

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:ggh:035

defazio.docs

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 502 Filed 05/11/09 Page 2 of 2