Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06741/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06741-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JORDAN BAXTER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SGT. MARTINEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-06741-AWI-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 26)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 20)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Jordan Baxter (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On March 29, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

Case 1:03-cv-06741-AWI -DLB Document 28 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed March 29, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss

for failure to exhaust prior to filing suit, filed February 6,

2006, is GRANTED; and,

3. This action is therefore DISMISSED, without prejudice,

for failure to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06741-AWI -DLB Document 28 Filed 08/29/06 Page 2 of 2