Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00635/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-00635-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STACIA LANGLEY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GUIDING HANDS SCHOOL, Inc., et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:20-cv-00635-TLN-KJN 

SEALING ORDER

In order to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and Local Rule 140, and 

good cause appearing to protect the privacy of certain minors and related student educational 

records, Plaintiffs’ Request to Seal (ECF No. 90) is GRANTED in part. More specifically, 

Plaintiffs seek the sealing of “Exhibits 7, 8, 11, 14 and 21 to the Declaration of Seth Goldstein in 

Support of Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial Notice at [ECF] No. 89.” (ECF No. 90.) The 

documents filed at ECF No. 89, however, are already appropriately redacted and need not be 

sealed. Rather, it appears Plaintiffs filed the entirety of Exhibits 7, 8, 11, 14, and 21 at ECF No. 

87. Those documents have been sealed pursuant to Plaintiffs’ Notice of Errata (ECF No. 95), but 

should nonetheless be SEALED until further order of this Court. Therefore, it is ORDERED that 

the following documents remain UNDER SEAL: 

• Exhibits 7, 8, 11, 14 and 21 filed in Support of Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial 

Notice, which documents are filed at ECF No. 87.

Case 2:20-cv-00635-DJC-CSK Document 97 Filed 07/16/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court understands various Defendants have objected to the timeliness of any and all 

filings by Plaintiffs after July 9, 2020, relating to Plaintiffs’ oppositions to Defendants motions to 

dismiss, strike, and/or sever. To the extent Defendants intend to object to Plaintiffs’ request to 

seal the above documents, such objections are overruled in light of the privacy concerns 

articulated above. To the extent Defendants intend to object to the underlying request(s) for 

judicial notice, oppositions, or any other purportedly tardy filings, Defendants may file such 

objections with the Court on the docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 15, 2020

Case 2:20-cv-00635-DJC-CSK Document 97 Filed 07/16/20 Page 2 of 2