Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02010/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02010-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 28:1334 Bankruptcy cases and proceedings under title 11

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: DENNIS K BRANDMAN,

ATTICUS SHARP,

Appellant,

 v.

DENNIS K. BRANDMAN and JUDITH

BRANDMAN,

Appellees.

 /

No. C 05-02010 JSW

ORDER DIRECTING APPELLEES

TO FILE A RESPONSIVE BRIEF

On June 28 and July 3, 2006, respectively, the Appellees Dennis Brandman and Judith

Brandman (“Appellees”) and Appellant Atticus Sharp (“Appellant”) informed the Court that the

automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) had been terminated and was no longer in effect. 

On May 16, 2005, Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from a Bankruptcy Court decision. 

On June 17, 2005, Appellant filed and served his opening brief in this matter. As of the date of

this Order, Appellees had not filed their responsive brief. Appellees are hereby directed to

respond to Appellant’s brief by no later than September 25, 2006. If Appellees do not file a 

///

///

///

///

Case 3:05-cv-02010-JSW Document 21 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

responsive brief by this date, the Court will consider the matter submitted and decide it on the

basis of Appellant’s opening brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 5, 2006 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-02010-JSW Document 21 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 2