Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01335/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01335-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RON ULREY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1335 MCE GGH P

vs.

LAURA WEST, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. For the

following reasons, the court recommends that this action be dismissed.

On July 28, 2006, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. 

On August 4, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for this action to be dismissed because of his inability

to pay the filing fee. On August 16, 2006, the court issued an order informing plaintiff that he

would be obligated to pay the filing fee even if this action were dismissed. The court granted

plaintiff thirty days to file either an amended complaint or a renewed request to voluntarily

dismiss this action.

On August 28, 2006, plaintiff filed a letter with the court stating that he was

unable to pay the filing fee. Plaintiff requests that the court “cancel” the order requiring him to

pay the fee. As discussed above, the court cannot “cancel” the order requiring him to pay the fee.

Case 2:06-cv-01335-MCE -GGH Document 12 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Nor did plaintiff file a request to

voluntarily dismiss this action. Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be

dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with the August 16, 2006, order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 

See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

DATED: 11/20/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

ul1335.dis

Case 2:06-cv-01335-MCE -GGH Document 12 Filed 11/20/06 Page 2 of 2