Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00885/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00885-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

CHARLES FORDJOUR, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:08 CV 0885 OWW WMW HC

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS AND TO COMPEL

[Doc. 13]

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELEASE

ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE

[Doc. 21]

ORDER DENYING MOTION DIRECTING

CLERK OF COURT

[Doc. 22]

ORDER DENYING MOTION RE NOTICE

[Doc. 23, 24]

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On September 2, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion for sanctions and

for an order compelling Respondent to serve Petitioner with notice of appearance. Respondent

filed a notice of appearance in this case on September 11, 2008. Accordingly, Petitioner’s

motion for sanctions and to compel [doc. 13] is HEREBY DENIED.

On September 29, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion for release on his own recognizance

pending review of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. In this petition, Petitioner challenges

the detainer placed on him by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, while he

remains in the Kings County Jail serving a state prison term. The court finds that Petitioner has

demonstrated no legal basis for release on his own recognizance, and therefore HEREBY

Case 1:08-cv-00885-OWW -WMW Document 25 Filed 10/02/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

DENIES Petitioner’s motion [doc. 21].

On September 29, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion for an order directing the Clerk of the

Court to serve Petitioner with a copy of the court order of August 22, 2008, docket no. 11. The

Clerk of the Court previously served Petitioner with a copy of that order on September 17, 2008. 

Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion [doc. 22] is HEREBY DENIED.

On September 29, 2008, Petitioner filed two motions seeking notice of any court orders

resolving motions for which he has not already received notice. No such order exist. 

Accordingly, Petitioner’s motions [docs. 23, 24] are HEREBY DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 2, 2008 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

bl0dc4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-00885-OWW -WMW Document 25 Filed 10/02/08 Page 2 of 2