Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01031/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01031-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCELINO MOISES MICHEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

G. FLOYD, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 1:14-cv-01031 AWI DLB PC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT 

ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Marcelino Moises Michel (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro 

se and in forma pauperis in this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint on 

July 2, 2014. 

On January 22, 2015, the Court screened the complaint and dismissed it with leave to amend. 

Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of service of 

the order.1

Over thirty (30) days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or 

otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, 

if any he has, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to follow a court order and for 

 

1 Upon review of the January 22, 2015, order, it appears that in the conclusion, the order incorrectly stated that Plaintiff 

would be permitted to amend only his gang validation issues. Plaintiff’s action does not involve gang validation issues, 

however, and Plaintiff is permitted to amend his complaint as otherwise discussed throughout the order. 

Case 1:14-cv-01031-AWI-DLB Document 11 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

failure to prosecute. Plaintiff SHALL file a response to this order within twenty-one (21) days. 

Plaintiff may also comply with this order by filing an amended complaint within this time frame.

If Plaintiff fails to respond to this order, the Court will recommend that this action be 

dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2015 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-01031-AWI-DLB Document 11 Filed 03/16/15 Page 2 of 2