Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_08-cv-05074/USCOURTS-arwd-5_08-cv-05074-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 385
Nature of Suit: Property Damage - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. MYERS DIVISION

FRANCIS X. KITCHENER, JR.; BRYAN

ALDERSON; JANETTE ALDERSON; DAVID

CARMICHAEL; PATRICIA CARMICHAEL,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 2:06-cv-553-FtM-29SPC

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.,

Defendant.

______________________________________

RELATED CASE ORDER

AND TRACK TWO NOTICE

It is hereby ORDERED that, no later than eleven days from the date of the filing of the

complaint (or a copy of a notice of removal) in this Court, counsel and any pro se party shall comply

with Local Rule 1.04(c), and shall file and serve a certification as to whether the instant action

should be designated as a similar or successive case pursuant to Local Rule 1.04(a) or (b). The

parties shall utilize the attached form NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTIONS. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with Local Rule 3.05, this action is designated

a Track Two case. All parties must comply with the requirements established in Local Rule 3.05

for Track Two cases. Counsel and any unrepresented party shall meet within sixty days after service

of the complaint upon any defendant for the purpose of preparing and filing a Case Management

Report. The parties shall utilize the attached CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT form. Unless

otherwise ordered by the Court, a party may not seek discovery from any source before the meeting.

Case 5:08-cv-05074-JLH Document 3 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: <pageID>
-2-

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (d); Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(B). Plaintiff (or defendant in a removal case) is

responsible for serving a copy of this notice and order with attachments upon each party no later

than eleven days after appearance of the party.

October 17, 2006

 JOHN E. STEELE 

 John E. Steele

 United States District Court Judge

 DOUGLAS N. FRAZIER SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL 

 Douglas N. Frazier Sheri Polster Chappell

 United States Magistrate Judge United States Magistrate Judge

Attachments: Notice of Pendency of Other Actions [mandatory form]

Case Management Report [mandatory form]

Note: A Magistrate Consent form, Local Rules and PacerNet can be found on the Court's website

at http://www.flmd.uscourts.

Copies: All Parties of Record

Case 5:08-cv-05074-JLH Document 3 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 11 PageID #: <pageID>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. MYERS DIVISION

FRANCIS X. KITCHENER, JR.; BRYAN

ALDERSON; JANETTE ALDERSON; DAVID

CARMICHAEL; PATRICIA CARMICHAEL,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 2:06-cv-553-FtM-29SPC

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.,

Defendant.

______________________________________

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTIONS

In accordance with Local Rule 1.04(c), I certify that the instant action:

_____ IS related to pending or closed civil or criminal case(s) previously filed in this

Court, or any other Federal or State court, or administrative agency as

indicated below:

_______________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________

_____ IS NOT related to any pending or closed civil or criminal case filed with this Court,

or any other Federal or State court, or administrative agency.

I further certify that I will serve a copy of this NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTIONS

upon each party no later than eleven days after appearance of the party.

Dated:

_____________________________ _____________________________

[Counsel of Record or Pro Se Party] [Counsel of Record or Pro Se Party]

 [Address and Telephone] [Address and Telephone]

Case 5:08-cv-05074-JLH Document 3 Filed 10/17/06 Page 3 of 11 PageID #: <pageID>
-4-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. MYERS DIVISION

FRANCIS X. KITCHENER, JR.; BRYAN

ALDERSON; JANETTE ALDERSON; DAVID

CARMICHAEL; PATRICIA CARMICHAEL,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 2:06-cv-553-FtM-29SPC

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.,

Defendant.

______________________________________

CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT

The parties have agreed on the following dates and discovery plan pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.

26(f) and Local Rule 3.05(c):

DEADLINE OR EVENT AGREED DATE

Mandatory Initial Disclosures (pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.

26(a)(1) as amended effective December 1, 2000)

[Court recommends 30 days after CMR meeting]

Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure

Statement 

[each party who has not previously filed must file immediately]

 

Motions to Add Parties or to Amend Pleadings

[Court recommends 1 - 2 months after CMR meeting]

Disclosure of Expert Reports Plaintiff: 

 Defendant:

[Court recommends last exchange 6 months before trial and 1 - 2

months before discovery deadline to allow expert depositions]

Case 5:08-cv-05074-JLH Document 3 Filed 10/17/06 Page 4 of 11 PageID #: <pageID>
DEADLINE OR EVENT AGREED DATE

-5-

Discovery Deadline

[Court recommends 5 months before trial to allow time for

dispositive motions to be filed and decided; all discovery must be

commenced in time to be completed before this date]

Dispositive Motions, Daubert, and Markman Motions 

[Court requires 4 months or more before trial term begins]

Meeting In Person to Prepare Joint Final Pretrial Statement

[10 days before Joint Final Pretrial Statement]

Joint Final Pretrial Statement (Including a Single Set of

Jointly-Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form

(with diskette), Voir Dire Questions, Witness Lists,

Exhibit Lists with Objections on Approved Form)

[Court recommends 6 weeks before Final Pretrial Conference]

All Other Motions Including Motions In Limine, Trial Briefs

[Court recommends 3 weeks before Final Pretrial Conference]

Final Pretrial Conference

[Court will set a date that is approximately 3 weeks before trial]

Trial Term Begins

[Local Rule 3.05 (c)(2)(E) sets goal of trial within 1 year of filing

complaint in most Track Two cases, and within 2 years in all Track

Two cases; trial termmust not be less than 4 months after dispositive

motions deadline (unless filing of such motions is waived); district

judge trial terms begin on the first business day of each month; trials

before magistrate judges will be set on a date certain after

consultation with the parties]

Estimated Length of Trial [trial days]

Jury / Non-Jury

Mediation Deadline:

 Mediator: 

 Address:

 

 Telephone:

[Absent arbitration, mediation is mandatory; Court recommends

either 2 - 3 months after CMR meeting, or just after discovery

deadline]

Case 5:08-cv-05074-JLH Document 3 Filed 10/17/06 Page 5 of 11 PageID #: <pageID>
DEADLINE OR EVENT AGREED DATE

A copy of the Local Rules may be viewed at http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov. 1

-6-

All Parties Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge Yes____ No____ 

Likely to Agree in 

Future _____ 

I. Meeting of Parties in Person

Lead counsel must meet in person and not bytelephone absent an order permitting otherwise.

Counsel will meet in the Middle District of Florida, unless counsel agree on a different location.

Pursuant to Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(B) or (c)(3)(A), a meeting was held in person on 1

___________________ (date) at (time) at (place) and was attended by:

Name Counsel for (if applicable)

II. Pre-Discovery Initial Disclosures of Core Information

A. Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(C) - (D) Disclosures

Local Rule 3.05(d) provides that these disclosures are mandatory in Track Two cases, and

optional in other cases unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Complete the following in all Track

Two cases and, when applicable, in Track Three Cases: 

The parties ____ have exchanged ____ agree to exchange (check one)

information described in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(C) - (D)

on by (check one) (date).

Below is a description of information disclosed or scheduled for disclosure.

B. Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A) - (B) Disclosures

Case 5:08-cv-05074-JLH Document 3 Filed 10/17/06 Page 6 of 11 PageID #: <pageID>
-7-

Local Rule 3.05(d) provides that these disclosures are not mandatory except as stipulated by

the parties or otherwise ordered by the Court. Complete the following when applicable: 

The parties ____have exchanged agree to exchange (check one)

information referenced by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A) - (B) on by (check one)

 (date). Below is a description of information disclosed or scheduled for

disclosure.

III. Agreed Discovery Plan for Plaintiffs and Defendants

A. Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement —

This Court has previously ordered each party, governmental party, intervenor, non-party

movant, and Rule 69 garnishee to file and serve a Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate

Disclosure Statement using a mandatory form. No party may seek discovery from any source

before filing and serving a Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement. 

A motion, memorandum, response, or other paper — including emergency motion — is

subject to being denied or stricken unless the filing party has previously filed and served its

Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement. Any party who has not

already filed and served the required certificate is required to do so immediately.

Every party that has appeared in this action to date has filed and served a Certificate of

Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement, which remains current:

_______ Yes

_______ No Amended Certificate will be filed by ____________________

(party) on or before ____________________ (date).

Case 5:08-cv-05074-JLH Document 3 Filed 10/17/06 Page 7 of 11 PageID #: <pageID>
-8-

B. Discovery Not Filed —

The parties shall not file discovery materials with the Clerk except as provided in Local Rule

3.03. The Court encourages the exchange of discovery requests on diskette. See Local Rule 3.03

(f). The parties further agree as follows:

C. Limits on Discovery —

Absent leave of Court, the parties may take no more than ten depositions per side (not per

party). Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(a)(2)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P. 31(a)(2)(A); Local Rule 3.02(b). Absent leave of

Court, the parties may serve no more than twenty-five interrogatories, including sub-parts.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 33(a); Local Rule 3.03(a). The parties may agree by stipulation on other limits on

discovery. The Court will consider the parties’ agreed dates, deadlines, and other limits in entering

the scheduling order. Fed.R.Civ.P. 29. In addition to the deadlines in the above table, the parties

have agreed to further limit discovery as follows:

1. Depositions

2. Interrogatories

3. Document Requests

4. Requests to Admit

5. Supplementation of Discovery

D. Discovery Deadline —

Each party shall timely serve discovery requests so that the rules allow for a response prior

to the discovery deadline. The Court may deny as untimely all motions to compel filed after the

discovery deadline. In addition, the parties agree as follows:

E. Disclosure of Expert Testimony —

On or before the dates set forth in the above table for the disclosure of expert reports, the

parties agree to fully comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) and 26(e). Expert testimony on direct

examination at trial will be limited to the opinions, basis, reasons, data, and other information

disclosed in the written expert report disclosed pursuant to this order. Failure to disclose such

information may result in the exclusion of all or part of the testimony of the expert witness. The

parties agree on the following additional matters pertaining to the disclosure of expert testimony:

Case 5:08-cv-05074-JLH Document 3 Filed 10/17/06 Page 8 of 11 PageID #: <pageID>
-9-

F. Confidentiality Agreements —

Whether documents filed in a case may be filed under seal is a separate issue from whether

the parties may agree that produced documents are confidential. The Court is a public forum, and

disfavors motions to file under seal. The Court will permit the parties to file documents under seal

only upon a finding of extraordinary circumstances and particularized need. See Brown v. Advantage

Engineering, Inc., 960 F.2d 1013 (11th Cir. 1992); Wilson v. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568

(11th Cir. 1985). A party seeking to file a document under seal must file a motion to file under seal

requesting such Court action, together with a memorandum of law in support. The motion, whether

granted or denied, will remain in the public record.

The parties may reach their own agreement regarding the designation of materials as

“confidential.” There is no need for the Court to endorse the confidentiality agreement. The Court

discourages unnecessary stipulated motions for a protective order. The Court will enforce

appropriate stipulated and signed confidentiality agreements. See Local Rule 4.15. Each

confidentiality agreement or order shall provide, or shall be deemed to provide, that “no party shall

file a document under seal without first having obtained an order granting leave to file under seal on

a showing of particularized need.” With respect to confidentiality agreements, the parties agree as

follows:

G. Other Matters Regarding Discovery —

IV. Settlement and Alternative Dispute Resolution.

A. Settlement — 

The parties agree that settlement is 

_____ likely ______ unlikely (check one)

Case 5:08-cv-05074-JLH Document 3 Filed 10/17/06 Page 9 of 11 PageID #: <pageID>
-10-

The parties request a settlement conference before a United States Magistrate

Judge.

 yes no likely to request in future

B. Arbitration — 

Local Rule 8.02(a) defines those civil cases that will be referred to arbitration

automatically. Does this case fall within the scope of Local Rule 8.02(a)?

 yes no

For cases not falling within the scope of Local Rule 8.02(a), the parties consent to

arbitration pursuant to Local Rules 8.02(a)(3) and 8.05(b):

 yes no likely to agree in future

_______ Binding ________Non-Binding

In any civil case subject to arbitration, the Court may substitute mediation for

arbitration upon a determination that the case is susceptible to resolution through mediation. Local

Rule 8.02(b). The parties agree that this case is susceptible to resolution through mediation, and

therefore jointly request mediation in place of arbitration:

 yes no likely to agree in future

C. Mediation — 

Absent arbitration or a Court order to the contrary, the parties in every case will

participate in Court-annexed mediation as detailed in Chapter Nine of the Court’s Local Rules. The

parties have agreed on a mediatorfrom theCourt’s approved list of mediators as set forth in the table

above, and have agreed to the date stated in the table above as the last date for mediation. The list

Case 5:08-cv-05074-JLH Document 3 Filed 10/17/06 Page 10 of 11 PageID #: <pageID>
-11-

of mediators is available from the Clerk, and is posted on the Court’s web site at

http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov.

D. Other Alternative Dispute Resolution — 

The parties intend to pursue the following other methods of alternative dispute resolution:

Date: _____________________

Signature of Counsel (with information required by Local Rule 1.05(d)) and Signature of

Unrepresented Parties.

____________________________________ _________________________________

____________________________________ _________________________________

____________________________________ _________________________________

____________________________________ _________________________________

____________________________________ _________________________________

Case 5:08-cv-05074-JLH Document 3 Filed 10/17/06 Page 11 of 11 PageID #: <pageID>