Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05318/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05318-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JULIAN ARCHULETA

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES

ARTHUR C. LIPTON

LIPTON & PIPER LLP

870 Market Street, Suite 945

San Francisco, CA 94102-2923

Telephone: 415/362-6286

Facsimile: 415/362-6819

Attorneys for Defendant IRMA ENCINAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JULIAN ARCHULETA, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES:HELPING

YOU HELP OTHERS, a California public

benefit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JACK’S CLUB; DOLORES L.

PERRAPATO, an individual dba JACK’S

CLUB; and IRMA ENCINAS, an

individual dba JACK’S CLUB, 

Defendants. ___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-5318 PJH

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”) herein, each party is to bear its

own costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 2

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511

U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of

settlement agreements).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: November 11, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

 By: /s/ Jennifer L. Steneberg 

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JULIAN ARCHULETA

and DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

Dated: November 3, 2005 LIPTON & PIPER LLP

By: /s/ Arthur C. Lipton 

Arthur C. Lipton

Attorneys for Defendant IRMA ENCINAS

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: _____________, 2005

 

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE December 6