Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-02289/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-02289-42/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Docket No. 729, Case No. 03-4669 and Docket No. 536, Case No. 03-2289. Filed December 7, 2006

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICOH COMPANY, LTD,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

 AEROFLEX INCORPORATED ET AL,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

 RICOH COMPANY, LTD,

Defendant.

 

No. C03-04669 MJJ

No. C03-02289 MJJ

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO STAY.

Before the Court is Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI

Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International

Corp., Matrox Tech, Inc. and Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc.’s (collectively the “Customer

Defendants”) Motion for Stay.1

 On December 8, 2006, this Court held a telephone case management

conference wherein Ricoh Company, Ltd. (“Ricoh” or “Plaintiff”), requested an opportunity to file

an Opposition Brief to Synopsys and the Customer Defendants’ motion.

Case 5:03-cv-02289-JW Document 538 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Ricoh shall file its Opposition Brief, not exceeding 5 pages in length, not later than 12:00

p.m. on December 11, 2006. Synopsys and the Customer Defendants shall file their Reply Brief, not

exceeding 5 pages, on December 12, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 8, 2006 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:03-cv-02289-JW Document 538 Filed 12/08/06 Page 2 of 2