Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00729/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00729-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KELVIN ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

MEYER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:09-cv-00729 DLB PC

ORDER DISREGARDING ORDER 

REQUIRING CLARIFICATION FROM 

PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL

(Document 73)

Plaintiff Kelvin Allen (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis 

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 20, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of 

Appeals remanded the action to this Court with instructions to vacate the judgment.

Pursuant to the July 23, 2014, Notice of Appearance, Plaintiff is represented by counsel for 

the limited purpose of resolving the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies.

On January 27, 2015, the Court issued an order to Plaintiff’s counsel requesting clarification 

of Plaintiff’s January 22, 2015, request for judicial notice. However, Plaintiff’s January 27, 2015, 

motion for the appointment of counsel includes many of the same exhibits and provided clarification

of Plaintiff’s purpose.

///

///

///

///

Case 1:09-cv-00729-DAD-SKO Document 75 Filed 01/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the January 27, 2015, order (Document 73) is DISREGARDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2015 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00729-DAD-SKO Document 75 Filed 01/28/15 Page 2 of 2