Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00224/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00224-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YOLANDA MORALEZ, surviving )

spouse and legal representative of the )

Estate of JOSE L. MORALEZ, and )

legal representative of her minor )

children, KAELYN MORALEZ, and )

DUSTIN MORALEZ, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. )

)

CITY OF FRESNO; CHIEF JERRY )

DYER; CAPTAIN AL MARONEY; )

LT. ART ALVARADO; LT. BURT )

FARRAH; SGT. RICHARD )

MENDOZA; DOES 1 through 20, )

inclusive, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F 06-0224 AWI SMS

ORDER VACATING HEARING

DATE OF MAY 1, 2006 AND

TAKING MATTER UNDER

SUBMISSION

Defendant City of Fresno has noticed for hearing and decision a motion to dismiss the

complaint or for a more definite statement and to strike portions of the complaint. The matter

was scheduled for hearing to be held on May 1, 2006. Pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(c),

Plaintiffs were required to file either an opposition or a notice of non-opposition no later than

April 17, 2006. Plaintiffs failed to do so.

Due to Plaintiffs’ failure to file a timely opposition or notice of non-opposition, they are

in violation of the Local Rules. See 78-230(c). Plaintiffs are further not entitled to be heard at

oral argument in opposition to the motion. See 78-230(c). The court has reviewed Defendant

City of Fresno’s motion and the applicable law, and has determined that the motion is suitable

Case 1:06-cv-00224-AWI -SMS Document 10 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 78-230(h). 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of May 1,

2006, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of May 1, 2006, the court will

take the matter under submission, and the court will thereafter issue its decision. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 24, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00224-AWI -SMS Document 10 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 2