Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05079/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05079-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

Case No. 4:09-CV-05079 PJH

1 STIPULATION AND ORDER 

KRONENBERGER BURGOYNE, LLP 

Karl S. Kronenberger (Bar No. 226112) 

James V. Weixel, Jr. (Bar No. 166024) 

150 Post Street, Suite 520 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Telephone: (415) 955-1155 

Facsimile: (415) 955-1158 

karl@KBInternetLaw.com 

jim@KBInternetLaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

I.E.I. Company Limited and International Education, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

I.E.I. COMPANY LIMITED, a Thailand 

corporation; INTERNATIONAL 

EDUCATION, INC., a Seychelles 

corporation, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

ADVANCE CULTURAL EXCHANGE 

TRAINING CORPORATION, a California 

corporation, initially named herein as 

“Advance Cultural Education and Training 

Corporation”; NAPAT VORAPUVADOL,

a/k/a Nawachol Boontham, an individual; 

NARIN NATHRADOL, a/k/a Monnipa 

Komolketruck, an individual; SUPAWADEE 

POONDEJ, a/k/a Supavadee Poondej, an 

individual; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 4:09-CV-05079 PJH 

STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED

COMPLAINT AND FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO RESPOND THERETO 

[Proposed] ORDER ON 

STIPULATION AND CONTINUING 

DEADLINES RE INITIAL 

DISCLOSURES 

Case 4:09-cv-05079-PJH Document 39 Filed 01/13/10 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 4:09-CV-05079 PJH STIPULATION AND ORDER 

 Plaintiffs I.E.I. Company Limited and International Education, Inc. (“plaintiffs”) 

and defendants Advance Cultural Exchange Training Corporation (“ACET”), 

Supawadee Poondej (“Poondej”), Napat Vorapuvadol (“Vorapuvadol”) and Narin 

Nathradol (“Nathradol”) (collectively “defendants”) by and through their undersigned 

counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 

 1. Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

defendants stipulate and agree that plaintiffs may file a Second Amended Verified 

Complaint on or before January 11, 2010, 

 2. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, plaintiffs and defendants stipulate and 

agree that defendants shall have up to and including February 12, 2010 in which to 

answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Verified Complaint, 

including but not limited to grounds based on personal jurisdiction and/or venue, if any. 

 3. This stipulation is made upon the following grounds and with the following 

facts in mind: 

 (a) This stipulation has been agreed to by the parties due to the fact that (1) 

plaintiffs wish to amend the pleadings to state a Lanham Act claim arising from 

defendants’ alleged use of plaintiffs’ names and marks in the matters alleged in the 

complaint; and (2) defendants ACET, Poondej, Vorapuvadol and Nathradol have 

recently secured representation in this matter and wish to enter an appearance herein, 

and their counsel will require additional time in which to investigate the matter and 

prepare a response to the Second Amended Verified Complaint. Said counsel will also 

be transitioning to a new law firm at the beginning of the new year. This stipulation will 

allow for the accomplishment of the parties’ objectives in those respects. 

 (b) There have been no previous time modifications in this case, whether by 

stipulation or Court order. 

 (c) The stipulated extension of time for defendants’ response to the 

complaint, if agreed to by the Court, would result in the deadline for defendants’ 

response to the Second Amended Verified Complaint to be extended past several 

Case 4:09-cv-05079-PJH Document 39 Filed 01/13/10 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 4:09-CV-05079 PJH STIPULATION AND ORDER 

currently set deadlines relating to the case management conference and the parties’ 

Rule 26 initial disclosures. The deadlines most likely to be affected by this extension 

are as follows: 

 (1) January 7, 2010: Last court day for parties to confer re Rule 26 initial 

disclosures and to file and serve ADR certification; 

 (2) January 21, 2010: Last court day to file case management statement and 

Rule 26(f) report; and 

 (3) January 28, 2010, 2:00 p.m.: Initial case management conference. 

 In light of the matters covered by this stipulation and the extensions and leave 

agreed to herein, the parties respectfully suggest to the Court that the above deadlines, 

as well as any other appropriate deadlines, should be extended accordingly to such 

dates as the Court may find are appropriate under the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: December 30, 2009 KRONENBERGER BURGOYNE, LLP 

By: /s/ James V. Weixel, Jr. ___ 

Karl S. Kronenberger 

James V. Weixel, Jr. 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 

I.E.I. COMPANY LIMITED and 

INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION, INC. 

Dated: December 30, 2009 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 

By: _/s/ Robert F. Hinton (per consent)______ 

 Robert F. Hinton 

Attorney for Defendants, ADVANCE 

CULTURAL EXCHANGE TRAINING 

CORPORATION, SUPAWADEE POONDEJ, 

NAPAT VORAPUVADOL and NARIN 

NATHRADOL 

Case 4:09-cv-05079-PJH Document 39 Filed 01/13/10 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 4:09-CV-05079 PJH STIPULATION AND ORDER 

ORDER

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED: 

 1. Plaintiffs may file a Second Amended Verified Complaint on or before 

January 11, 2010. 

 2. Defendants shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Second 

Amended Verified Complaint on or before February 12, 2010. 

 3. The deadline for the parties’ submission of Rule 26 initial disclosures and 

case management statements, currently January 21, 2010, is continued to _________, 

2010. All deadlines and other requirements imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, local rule, standing order of this Court, or otherwise are continued 

accordingly and shall be calculated in accordance with the new date. 

 4. The initial case management conference in this matter, currently 

scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on January 28, 2010, is continued to ___________, 2010, at 

2:00 p.m. All deadlines and other requirements imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, local rule, standing order of this Court, or otherwise are continued and shall 

be calculated in accordance with the new date. 

 

Dated: January ____, 2010 

________________________________ 

 Hon. PHYLLIS F. HAMILTON 

 United States District Judge 

March 4

March 11 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:09-cv-05079-PJH Document 39 Filed 01/13/10 Page 4 of 4