Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02043/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02043-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 140
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The caption has been amended according to the Dismissal of Doe 1

Defendants portion of this Order.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCO PEREZ, )

) 02:09-cv-02043-GEB-KJM

Plaintiff, ) 

) STATUS ORDER AND ORDER

v. ) CONTINUING (PRETRIAL 

) SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

GMAC MORTGAGE; KAY-CO ) 

INVESTMENTS DBA PRO30 FUNDING;) 

ETS SERVICES, LLC; MORTGAGE )

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION )

SYSTEMS, INC.; ELITE MORTGAGE )

& ASSOCIATES; JAMES RAY WALL, )

JR.; RANDALL GILBERT; ADAM ) 

LANCASTER, )

)

Defendants. )

1

)

A status conference was scheduled in this case on

February 1, 2010; however, that status conference was submitted

after Plaintiff failed to file a status report. Defendants GMAC

MORTGAGE, LLC (sued as “GMAC Mortgage)” and ETS SERVICES, LLC (sued

as “Executive Trustee Services, LLC dba ETS Services, LLC”)

(hereinafter “GMACM Defendants”) filed a late status report, in

which they argue Plaintiff’s complaint does not state a legal claim

against them and indicate this case should not be fully scheduled. 

Sanctions can be imposed when a court filing deadline is not met. 

Case 2:09-cv-02043-GEB -KJM Document 32 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Since Plaintiff has not filed a status report explaining 

how he plans to prosecute this action and GMACM Defendants indicate

the action should not yet be fully scheduled, the following status

order issues. A further status hearing is scheduled to commence at

9:00 a.m. on June 14, 2010, and a joint status report shall be

filed fourteen days before the status hearing.

DISMISSAL OF DOE DEFENDANTS

Since Plaintiff has not justified Doe defendants

remaining in this action, Does 1 through 20 are dismissed. See

Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference filed July

24, 2009, at 2 n.2 (indicating that if justification for "Doe"

defendant allegations not provided Doe defendants would be

dismissed).

SERVICE, JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES, AMENDMENT

No further service or joinder of parties is permitted,

except with leave of Court, good cause having been shown. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:09-cv-02043-GEB -KJM Document 32 Filed 02/04/10 Page 2 of 2