Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-04635/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-04635-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EDWIN JAY HUTCHINSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

CALIFORNIA PRISON INDUSTRY 

AUTHORITY, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

________________________________/ 

No. C 13-04635 CW 

 

ORDER REGARDING 

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE 

TO THE MOTIONS FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

On September 25, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion 

under Rule 56(d) and ordered that all discovery disputes and 

issues be presented to Magistrate Judge Beeler. Docket No. 113. 

The Court further ordered that Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ 

motions for summary judgment would be due twenty-eight days after 

the discovery disputes were resolved. On April 29, 2016, 

Magistrate Judge Beeler entered an order requiring Defendant A. 

Deems to produce certain photographs and stating, “Discovery is 

now closed.” Docket No. 181. 

Defendant Deems shall file a notice when he produces the 

photographs. Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ motions for 

summary judgment is within twenty-eight days thereafter. 

Defendants’ replies are due fourteen days after service of 

Plaintiff’s response 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 3, 2016 

CLAUDIA WILKEN 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:13-cv-04635-CW Document 182 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 1