Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00116/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-00116-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS EPSON AMERICA, INC. and 

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION

Case No. 10-cv-00116 PJH 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

SMDK CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CREATIVE LABS, INC., a California 

corporation, CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY LTD., 

a Singapore corporation, COBY ELECTRONICS 

CORPORATION, a New York corporation, 

EPSON AMERICA, INC. , a California 

corporation, SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a 

Japan corporation, SEIKO CORPORATION, a 

Japan corporation, TIC COMPUTER, INC., 

D/B/A WOLVERINE DATA, a California 

corporation, VOSONIC TECHNOLOGY 

CORPORATION, a Taiwan corporation, 

PHISON CORPORATION, a Taiwan 

corporation, THOMSON, D/B/A RCA BY 

THOMSON, a France corporation, AUDIOVOX 

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 10-cv-00116 PJH

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL 

OF DEFENDANTS EPSON AMERICA, 

INC. and SEIKO EPSON 

CORPORATION

Case 4:10-cv-00116-PJH Document 218 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS EPSON AMERICA, INC. and 

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION

Case No. 10-cv-00116 PJH 

ORDER 

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. This action by and between Plaintiff SMDK CORPORATION and Defendants 

EPSON AMERICA, INC. and SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION., including all claims and 

counterclaims, shall be dismissed with prejudice; and 

2. Each party to this action shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: ____________ BY: ______________________________________ 

 Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

United State District Judge 

7/6/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:10-cv-00116-PJH Document 218 Filed 07/06/10 Page 2 of 2