Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00260/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00260-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM ROBERT BRADLEY,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFF WRIGLEY,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 07-00260 OWW DLB HC

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT AND CLOSE CASE

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner is represented by Nathan J. Hochman. 

On May 9, 2007, this Court granted the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Respondent

was ordered to consider the appropriateness of transferring Petitioner to a residential re-entry

center (“RRC”) in light of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b), not excluding any other

factors deemed appropriate by the BOP, without reference to the BOP policy promulgated in

December 2002 and without reference to the BOP’s February 14, 2005, amendment to 28 C.F.R.

§ 570.21. Respondent was directed to make this determination within 14 days of the date of the

December 20, 2006, Order (hereinafter “Order”).

On May 14, 2007, Respondent filed a verification of compliance and request for entry of

judgment. Respondent has submitted the declaration of Georgina Puentes, Camp Administrator

for the prison camp at Taft, as verification of compliance with the Court’s May 9, 2007, order. 

Ms. Puentes declares that she is responsible for performing Petitioner’s evaluation for RRC

Case 1:07-cv-00260-OWW -DLB Document 11 Filed 06/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

placement. (Declaration, at 2-3.) Ms. Puentes declares that due to the fact that Petitioner is

serving a very short sentence, has ties to the community, and needs not time to find lodging or

employment, he does not need time in an RRC to adjust to the community. Petitioner has

therefore not been referred for pre-release placement in an RRC. Thus, because the re-evaluation

has been conducted in accordance with the Court’s May 9, 2007, order, judgment shall be

entered.

ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter

judgment and close this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 15, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00260-OWW -DLB Document 11 Filed 06/18/07 Page 2 of 2