Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01794/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01794-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAUL BARRIOS PEREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

DILL, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01794-LJO-BAM PC

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(ECF Nos. 82, 83)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Saul Barrios Perez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed July 22, 2008, against Defendants Dill, Harden, Sobbe,

Sandoval, Tyson, Chan, and Brown for deliberate indifference to conditions of confinement in

violation of the Eighth Amendment. On March 2, 2012, Defendants filed a motion for summary

judgment. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local

Rule 230(l). 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’

motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days from the date of service of

this order; and

///

///

///

1

Case 1:07-cv-01794-BAM Document 84 Filed 04/09/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. The failure to respond to Defendants’ motion in compliance with this order will

result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 9, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

cm411 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:07-cv-01794-BAM Document 84 Filed 04/09/12 Page 2 of 2