Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00096/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00096-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

- 1 - 

 [proposed] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION AND MOTION FOR TRO/OSC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DANIEL R. BASHAM and CAROLE 

BASHAM, 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

PACIFIC FUNDING GROUP, a California 

business entity, form unknown; 

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; a 

California corporation; WELLS FARGO 

HOME MORTGAGE, INC., a California 

corporation, dba AMERICA’S SERVICE 

COMPANY; CITIBANK N.A. AS 

INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR BSARM 

2007-2, a business entity, form unknown; 

NDEX WEST, L.L.C., a Delaware 

corporation; and DOES 1-100, Inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 2:10-CV-00096-WBS-GGH 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX 

PARTE APPLICATION AND MOTION FOR 

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE PENDING 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

DATE: January 14, 2010 

TIME: 9:00 A.M. 

DEPT: Courtroom 5, 14th Floor 

CASE FILED: January 13, 2010 

Hon. William B. Shubb 

 ) 

This matter came on for hearing on plaintiffs’ ex parte motion for a temporary restraining 

order at 9:00 a.m. on January 14, 2010. Plaintiffs were represented by Stephen C. Ruehmann. 

No appearance was made on behalf of any of the defendants. Counsel has submitted a 

declaration setting forth the manner in which notice was given, or attempted to be given, to each 

of the defendants except Pacific Funding Group. On reading the ex parte application with 

supporting points and authorities of Plaintiffs DANIAL R. BASHAM and CAROLE BASHAM 

(“Plaintiffs”), the declarations of Plaintiffs and Stephen C. Ruehmann, the Request for Judicial 

Notice, file and Complaint herein, it appears to the satisfaction of the Court that this is a proper case 

for granting a temporary restraining order and an order to show cause pending preliminary 

Case 2:10-cv-00096-WBS-GGH Document 12 Filed 01/14/10 Page 1 of 3
- 2 - 

 [proposed] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION AND MOTION FOR TRO/OSC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

injunction, and that unless the temporary restraining order prayed for be granted, great or irreparable 

injury will result to Plaintiffs before the matter can be heard on regular notice. 

Specifically, it appears that the threatened injury is the foreclosure upon plaintiffs’ home and 

that such injury would be irreparable for the reasons discussed in Chetal v. American Home Mortg., 

No C 09-02727 CRB, 2009 WL 2612312, at *2(N.D.Cal. Aug. 24, 2009). From a reading of the 

complaint, assuming all of the facts alleged therein to be true, it appears that plaintiffs are likely to 

succeed at least on their state law claim of wrongful foreclosure. This order is issued without further 

notice to defendants because counsel for plaintiff has represented that he gave notice the best he 

could, and given the short time the court had to consider the motion the court was unable be 

determine any way that notice could be more effectively given to each of the defendants. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC., a California 

corporation, dba AMERICA’S SERVICE COMPANY, CITIBANK N.A. AS INDENTURE 

TRUSTEE FOR BSARM 2007-2, and NDEX WEST, L.L.C (collectively “Defendants”), and each of 

them, appear in Courtroom 5, 14th Floor of this Court, located at 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 

at 2 p.m. on January 25, 2010, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, then and there to 

show cause, if any they have, why they and their agents, servants, employees, and representatives, 

and all persons acting in concert on participating with them, should not be enjoined or restrained 

during the pendency of this action from engaging in, committing, or performing, directly or 

indirectly, any and all of the following acts: 

a. Selling, transferring, conveying, foreclosing upon, evicting or any other conduct adverse to 

Plaintiff regarding the real property located at 110 Bewicks Circle, Sacramento, California 

95834. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending the hearing and determination of the order to 

show cause the above named Defendants, and each of them, and their officers, agents, employees, 

Case 2:10-cv-00096-WBS-GGH Document 12 Filed 01/14/10 Page 2 of 3
- 3 - 

 [proposed] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION AND MOTION FOR TRO/OSC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

representatives and all persons acting in concert or participating with them, are restrained and 

enjoined from engaging in or performing directly or indirectly, any and all of the following acts: - 

a. Selling, transferring, conveying, foreclosing upon, evicting or any other conduct adverse to 

plaintiff regarding the real property located at 1110 Bewicks Circle, Sacramento, California 

95834. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 

a. Plaintiff shall serve this order to show cause on defendants forthwith in the manner provided by 

law. 

b. Proof of service must be delivered forthwith prior to the court hearing the Order to Show Cause. 

c. The parties shall adhere to the following briefing schedule: 

Plaintiff: January 15, 2010 

Defendants: January 20, 2010 

Reply: January 22, 2010 

This TRO shall expire at 4:30 p.m. on: January 25, 2010, 2009 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of the summons, complaint, ex parte application, 

declarations, memorandum of points and authorities, request for judicial notice and this order to 

show cause and temporary restraining order be served on defendants by personal service, fax or 

email no later than January 15, 2010. 

THIS TEMPRORARY RESTRAINING ORDER IS CONDITIONED UPON PLAINTIFFS’ 

POSTING BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 65(c) of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Issued at 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, at 9:30 a.m., on January 14, 2010. 

Case 2:10-cv-00096-WBS-GGH Document 12 Filed 01/14/10 Page 3 of 3