Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01464/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01464-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Charles Trayzon Gilbert is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On December 6, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations 

recommending that this action proceed on Plaintiff’s failure to protect claim against Defendants M. 

Wood, E. Gonzalez, and V. Gonzalez, and Plaintiff’s claim for deliberate indifference to a serious 

medical need be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 10.) The Findings and 

Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were due within 

twenty-one days. Plaintiff filed objections on December 26, 2019. (ECF No. 11.) 

///

///

CHARLES TRAYZON GILBERT,

 Plaintiff,

v.

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et.al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:19-cv-01464-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

[ECF No. 10]

Case 1:19-cv-01464-NONE-SAB Document 12 Filed 01/06/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections, the 

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on December 6, 2019, are adopted in full;

2. The instant action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s failure to protect claim against 

Defendants M. Wood, E. Gonzalez, and V. Gonzalez; 

3. Plaintiff’s claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need be dismissed for 

failure to state a cognizable claim; and 

4. The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for initiation of service of process. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2020 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-01464-NONE-SAB Document 12 Filed 01/06/20 Page 2 of 2