Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00258/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00258-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

S. DANIELSON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00258-OWW-SKO PC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO INFORM COURT

OF CHANGE IN ADDRESS

Plaintiff Raymond Hernandez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 9, 2010, the Court issued

an order informing Plaintiff that this action was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. 

(Doc. #33.) On April 27, 2010, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause why

Defendants Shu and Kim should not be dismissed from this action. (Doc. #34.) Both orders were

mailed to Plaintiff and both orders were returned to the Court as undeliverable because Plaintiff was

not in custody at the address in the Court’s file.

Under Local Rule 182(f), Plaintiff is required to inform the Court of any change of address. 

It appears that Plaintiff has failed to inform the Court of a change in his address. Accordingly,

Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for

Plaintiff’s failure to inform the Court of the change in his address.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 12, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

Case 1:06-cv-00258-OWW -SKO Document 35 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 1