Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_15-cv-00259/USCOURTS-ared-4_15-cv-00259-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

WESTERN DIVISION 

CASEY MYERS 

v. No. 4:15-cv-259-DPM 

PLAINTIFF 

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY DEFENDANT 

ORDER 

Casey Myers and GEICO have a dispute about her underinsured 

coverage. Myers submitted bills to her insurance company but GEICO hasn't 

paid them. Myers believes and claims this amounts to bad faith. It does not. 

The governing Arkansas law is strict. Because Myers hasn't offered evidence 

that GEICO acted dishonestly, maliciously, or oppressively, her claim fails as 

a matter of law. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Broadway Arms Corp., 281 Ark. 

128, 133, 664 S.W.2d 463, 465 (1984). GEICO's motion for partial summary 

judgment, NQ 16, is granted. 

So Ordered. 

D.P. Marshall Jf 

United States District Judge 

I'/ odol.M_ J..0/t., 

Case 4:15-cv-00259-DPM Document 25 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 1