Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01074/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01074-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26:7422 IRS: Refund Taxes

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Steven I Rhodes, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

United States Internal Revenue Service;

Douglas Schulman, Commissioner of the

Internal Revenue Service; 

Deborah Morales, “Intake Advocate,” IRS

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 10-CV-1074-PHX-DGC

ORDER

Defendants move to dismiss pro se Plaintiff’s case for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and for insufficient service of

process under Rule 12(b)(5). Docs. 7, 7-1. Plaintiff has filed a motion to continue briefing

of Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Doc. 10. Plaintiff has not shown good cause for

continuance, and the Court will deny the motion. Because the continuance request was filed

pro se before the response due date, however, the Court will permit Plaintiff to file a

response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss by December 10, 2010.

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for continuance (Doc. 10) is denied.

Case 2:10-cv-01074-DGC Document 13 Filed 11/24/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

2. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 7) by

December 10, 2010. Defendants may file a reply by December 17, 2010.

DATED this 24th day of November, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-01074-DGC Document 13 Filed 11/24/10 Page 2 of 2