Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00625/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00625-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELISELO ARRELLANO,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0625 GEB GGH P

vs.

DIRECTOR OF CDCR, et al., 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In 2001 petitioner was convicted of possession of firearms

by a felon or narcotic addict. He was sentenced to 2 years and 8 months. On August 21, 2003,

petitioner was released on parole. On September 27, 2005, petitioner’s parole was revoked and

he was returned to custody for a 12 month term.

In the instant petition, petitioner challenges the legality of the 2005 parole

revocation proceedings. On June 23, 2006, respondent filed an answer to the petition. 

According to respondent, petitioner was to be released from prison on August 24, 2006. Because

petitioner’s sentence on the parole revocation has expired, petitioner is ordered to show cause

why this action should not be dismissed as moot.

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00625-GEB-GGH Document 13 Filed 09/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days of the date of

this order, petitioner shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed as moot; failure to

respond to this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action.

DATED: 9/6/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

arr625.osc

Case 2:06-cv-00625-GEB-GGH Document 13 Filed 09/07/06 Page 2 of 2