Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01029/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01029-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRY L. SCHERMERHORN, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-06-1029 DFL GGH P

vs.

BILL LOCKYER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On September 6, 2006, plaintiffs filed objections to the magistrate judge’s order

filed August 10, 2006, severing their actions and ordering them to show cause why their actions

should not be construed as habeas corpus petitions. The court construes plaintiffs’ objections to

be a request for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s

orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire

file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-01029-JKS-GGH Document 17 Filed 03/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed September 6, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: March 19, 2007

/s/ David F. Levi 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

sch1029.850

Case 2:06-cv-01029-JKS-GGH Document 17 Filed 03/19/07 Page 2 of 2