Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01418/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01418-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WINDY LINN CLICK, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

MATTHEW CATE, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:09-cv-014180OWW-JLT HC 

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

(Doc. 21)

ORDER SETTING SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding via counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The instant petition was filed on August 5, 2009. (Doc. 1). On

November 9, 2009, Respondent filed an Answer. (Doc. 14). On December 23, 2009, Petitioner,

through her counsel, filed a Traverse. (Doc. 19). At that point, the case was at issue and ready for a

decision.

On May 13, 2010, Respondent filed the instant motion to file supplemental briefing based on

the recently decided Ninth Circuit case, Hayward v. Marshall, 2010 WL 1664977 (9 Cir. 2010). th

(Doc. 21). In that motion, which is also signed by Petitioner’s counsel, the parties suggest that

Petitioner file a supplement brief within thirty days, that Respondent file a supplemental brief within

thirty days thereafter, and that Petitioner may file a reply brief within fifteen days of service of

Respondent’s supplemental brief.

U.S. District Court

E. D. California 1

Case 1:09-cv-01418-OWW -JMD Document 22 Filed 06/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Accordingly, GOOD CAUSE appearing therefor, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:

1. Respondent’s motion to file supplemental briefing, limited to the effect of Hayward v.

Marshall, 2010 WL 1664977 (9 Cir. 2010), on the issues raised in the instant petition th

(Doc. 21), is GRANTED.

2. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order within which to

file her supplemental brief.

3. Respondent is granted thirty days from the date of service of Petitioner’s

supplemental brief within which to file his supplemental brief.

4. Petitioner may file a reply brief within fifteen days of the date of service of

Respondent’s supplemental brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2010 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

9j7khi UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

U.S. District Court

E. D. California 2

Case 1:09-cv-01418-OWW -JMD Document 22 Filed 06/10/10 Page 2 of 2