Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01796/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01796-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH,

Plaintiff,

 v.

C. WILLIAMS, et al.,

Defendants. ____________________________________ 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 10-1796 MMC (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL;

DENYING LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

 (Docket No. 3)

On April 26, 2010, plaintiff, a California prisoner incarcerated at California State

Prison – Solano and proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. Together with his complaint, plaintiff filed an incomplete application to

proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Docket No. 3.) That same date, the Court notified

plaintiff in writing that the action was deficient due to plaintiff’s failure to pay the requisite

filing fee or, instead, to submit a completed court-approved IFP application. Specifically, in

said notice, plaintiff was advised that he must submit a Certificate of Funds in Prisoner’s

Account completed and signed by an authorized officer at the prison, and must attach a copy

of his prisoner trust account statement showing transactions for the last six months. Plaintiff

was further advised that his failure to pay the filing fee or, alternatively, to file a completed

IFP application, within thirty days, would result in dismissal of the action. Along with said

notice, plaintiff was sent a copy of the court-approved prisoner’s IFP application, instructions

for completing it, and a return envelope. 

More than thirty days have passed since the deficiency notice was sent to plaintiff and

Case 3:10-cv-01796-MMC Document 6 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

he has not filed a completed IFP application or paid the filing fee. Accordingly, the abovetitled action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Additionally, the incomplete

application to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED and no fee is due.

This order terminates Docket No. 3.

The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 15, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-01796-MMC Document 6 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 2