Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_08-cv-00955/USCOURTS-almd-2_08-cv-00955-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST )

COMPANY, successor in )

interest to Colonial Bank )

by acquisition of assets )

from FDIC as Receiver for )

Colonial Bank, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:08cv955-MHT

) (WO) 

SYNTELLECT, INC., a ) 

Delaware corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Defendant Syntellect, Inc. raises overlapping

“objections to [specified] evidence submitted by

Plaintiff [Branch Banking and Trust Company] in

Opposition to Syntellect’s Motion for Summary Judgment,”

Objection at 1 (Doc. No. 95), and “to [specified]

evidence submitted by plaintiff in support of its Motion

for Partial Summary Judgment,” Objection at 1 (Doc. No.

82). In resolving the cross-motions for summary

Case 2:08-cv-00955-MHT-WC Document 111 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 2
judgment, the court found no need to rely on the evidence

to which Syntellect objects.

For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED that

defendant Syntellect, Inc.’s objections (doc. nos. 82 &

95) are overruled as moot. 

DONE, this the 22nd day of July, 2010.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:08-cv-00955-MHT-WC Document 111 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 2