Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01162/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01162-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CASE NO. CV-14-01162-KAW

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

4328 Redwood Hwy, Suite 300

San Rafael, CA 94903

Telephone: 415/444-5800

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

E-Mail: tfrankovich@disabilitieslaw.com

Attorney For Plaintiff, HOLLY CASH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOLLY CASH,

Plaintiff,

v.

EL PALACIO LATINO RESTAURANT;

ARMANDO MOLINA

Defendants.

__________________________ ________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CV-14-01162-KAW

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”) herein, each party is to bear its own

costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511

U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of

settlement agreements).

///

Case 4:14-cv-01162-KAW Document 21 Filed 07/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CASE NO. CV-14-01162-KAW

-2-

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through

their designated counsel that the above-captioned action become and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: July 2, 2015 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Thomas E Frankovich 

Thomas E. Frankovich

Attorney for Plaintiff HOLLY CASH

Dated: July 2, 2015 Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | JMBM

By: /s/ Stuart K. Tubis 

Stuart K. Tubis

Attorneys for Defendants EL PALACIO LATINO

RESTAURANT; ARMANDO MOLINA

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the

purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary

Dated: _____________, 2015 

 

Magistrate Kandis A. Westmore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7/6 MAGISTRATE

Case 4:14-cv-01162-KAW Document 21 Filed 07/06/15 Page 2 of 2