Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228-56/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

5:13-cv-00228-RMW

FURTHER SCHEDULING ORDER

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ADIL HIRAMANEK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

L. MICHAEL CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:13-cv-00228-RMW 

FURTHER SCHEDULING ORDER

Re: Dkt. Nos. 549, 550

Defendants Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara and Beth Miller move to 

extend the deadline to conduct a settlement conference with plaintiffs before Magistrate Judge 

Grewal. Dkt. No. 550. Plaintiffs Roda and Adil Hiramanek oppose and request that this court hold 

a case management conference on February 25, 2016. Dkt. Nos. 549, 551.

This court’s previous scheduling order set a deadline of March 3, 2016 to conduct the 

settlement conference, Dkt. No. 201, and a settlement conference is set for February 29, 2016, 

Dkt. No. 509. Given the parties’ apparent difficulty in agreeing upon a settlement conference date, 

the court finds that moving forward with the conference as scheduled on February 29, 2016 may 

be the most efficient way to attempt to resolve their disputes. If the parties are unable to achieve a 

negotiated settlement on February 29, a further settlement conference may be scheduled at least 10 

days before the (yet to be rescheduled) trial date in this case if Judge Grewal believes it would be 

Case 3:13-cv-00228-JD Document 552 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 2
2

5:13-cv-00228-RMW

FURTHER SCHEDULING ORDER

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

productive.

The court is unavailable for a case management conference on February 25, 2016 due to an 

ongoing trial, and no proceedings in this case will take place on that date. The court appreciates 

plaintiffs’ desire to achieve a speedy resolution of their claims, but plaintiffs need to understand 

that this court has limited resources to dedicate to any given case, including theirs. If the parties 

are unable to resolve their dispute at the February 29, 2016 settlement conference, the court will 

determine an appropriate schedule for the pretrial conference and trial in this matter after receiving 

the parties’ submissions regarding plaintiffs’ remaining Americans with Disabilities Act 

allegations. See Dkt. No. 546 at 20. Any remaining issues requiring court attention can be 

addressed in an amended joint pretrial statement in advance of the pretrial conference.

This order does not address Mr. Hiramanek’s claims against defendants McChristian, Plett, 

and Polumbus. A separate order will address those claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2016

______________________________________

Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-00228-JD Document 552 Filed 02/23/16 Page 2 of 2