Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_15-cv-08063/USCOURTS-azd-3_15-cv-08063-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

William Timothy Stack, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Carolyn W. Colvin, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. 

No. CV-15-08063-PCT-JAT 

ORDER OF REMAND AND 

JUDGMENT 

Based on the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 13), 

IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned case is REVERSED and REMANDED 

for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 

On remand, the Appeals Council will direct an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) as 

follows. The ALJ will reevaluate whether Plaintiff’s medically determinable 

impairments meet or equal the requirements of any listing at step 3 of the sequential 

evaluation process, including Listing 12.05C, with further discussion of whether Plaintiff 

has deficits in adaptive functioning. In so doing, the ALJ will consult an appropriate 

medical expert and offer Plaintiff the opportunity to address the medical expert’s opinion. 

If warranted, the ALJ will reevaluate Plaintiff’s maximum residual functional capacity 

Case 3:15-cv-08063-JAT Document 14 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

pursuant to Social Security Ruling 96-8p; obtain supplemental vocational expert evidence 

at step 4; and, if necessary proceed to step 5 of the sequential evaluation process. The 

ALJ will consider any new evidence submitted and issue a new decision. 

Upon proper presentation to this Court, Plaintiff will be entitled to reasonable 

attorney fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT is entered for Plaintiff, and this 

case is closed. 

 Dated this 14th day of October, 2015. 

Case 3:15-cv-08063-JAT Document 14 Filed 10/14/15 Page 2 of 2