Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02350/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02350-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRED FELEKI MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFF LYNCH, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:23-cv-2350 CKD P

ORDER 

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

1983. Plaintiff’s January 22, 2024, amended complaint is before the court for screening.

The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 

governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 

court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 

“frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek 

monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). 

The court has reviewed plaintiff’s amended complaint and finds that plaintiff may proceed 

on the following claims:

1. A claim for excessive use of force in violation of the Eighth Amendment against 

defendants Earnshaw, Botelho, and Gutierrez.

/////

Case 2:23-cv-02350-CKD Document 22 Filed 09/13/24 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. A claim for failure to protect arising under the Eighth Amendment against defendant 

Hibbard.

At this point, plaintiff has two options: proceed on the claims identified above or file a

second amended complaint to attempt to cure deficiencies with respect to the other claims.

If plaintiff chooses to proceed on the claims described above, the court will construe this as a 

request to voluntarily dismiss the additional claims pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(i) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure.

With respect to plaintiff’s claim arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 

plaintiff is informed that Title II of the ADA “prohibit[s] discrimination on the basis of 

disability.” Lovell v. Chandler, 303 F.3d 1039, 1052 (9th Cir. 2002). Title II of the ADA applies 

to inmates within state prisons. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections v. Yeskey, 524 U.S. 206, 208 

(1998). “To establish a violation of Title II of the ADA, a plaintiff must show that (1) [he] is a 

qualified individual with a disability; (2) [he] was excluded from participation in or otherwise 

discriminated against with regard to a public entity’s services, programs, or activities; and (3) 

such exclusion or discrimination was by reason of [his] disability.” Lovell, 303 F.3d at 1052. 

“To recover monetary damages under Title II of the ADA, a plaintiff must prove intentional 

discrimination on the part of the defendant,” and the standard for intentional discrimination is at 

least deliberate indifference. Duvall v. County of Kitsap, 260 F.3d 1124, 1138 (9th Cir. 2001). 

Finally, plaintiff is informed that the court cannot refer to a prior pleading in order to 

make plaintiff’s second amended complaint complete. Local Rule 220 requires that an amended 

complaint be complete in itself without reference to any prior pleading. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff has the option to proceed immediately on the claims described herein. In the 

alternative, plaintiff may choose to file a second amended complaint to fix the deficiencies 

identified in this order with respect to the remaining claims.

2. Within 21 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and return the 

attached Notice of Election form notifying the court whether he wants to proceed on the screened 

amended complaint or whether he wants time to file a second amended complaint.

Case 2:23-cv-02350-CKD Document 22 Filed 09/13/24 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

3. If plaintiff fails to return the attached Notice of Election within the time provided, the 

court will construe this failure as consent to dismiss the deficient claims and proceed only on the 

cognizable claim identified above. 

Dated: September 13, 2024

1

mart2350.option

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:23-cv-02350-CKD Document 22 Filed 09/13/24 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRED FELEKI MARTINEZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JEFF LYNCH,

 Defendant.

No. 2:23-cv-2350 CKD P

NOTICE OF ELECTION 

Check only one option:

_____ 1. Plaintiff wishes to proceed on the following claims:

A. A claim for excessive use of force in violation the Eighth Amendment against 

defendants Earnshaw, Botelho and Gutierrez.

B. A claim for failure to protect arising under the Eighth Amendment against defendant 

Hibbard.

_____ 2. Plaintiff wants time to file a second amended complaint.

DATED: 

____________________ 

 Plaintiff

Case 2:23-cv-02350-CKD Document 22 Filed 09/13/24 Page 4 of 4