Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03758/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03758-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1402 Medical Malpractice

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE and

VETERANS UNITED FOR TRUTH, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JAMES B. PEAKE, Secretary of

Veterans Affairs, et al., Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-07-3758 SC

ORDER GRANTING IN

PART AND DENYING IN

PART PLAINTIFFS'

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

TO FILE REPLY

DECLARATION OF MOTHER

CONTAINING PERSONAL

IDENTIFYING

INFORMATION UNDER

SEAL AND LIMITING

WITNESSES FOR

PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION HEARING

I. MOTION TO SEAL

Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. 

See Docket No. 88. The Court has scheduled a hearing on this

Motion for Monday, March 3, 2008. See Docket No. 135. In support

of their Motion, Plaintiffs have filed an Administrative Motion to

File Reply Declaration of Mother Containing Personal Identifying

Information Under Seal. See Docket No. 120. It is hereby ORDERED

that:

The unredacted Reply Declaration of Mother shall be filed

under seal to protect the information from public disclosure. A

redacted version shall be filed on the public docket. 

Plaintiffs' Motion is DENIED in all other respects.

Case 3:07-cv-03758-SC Document 142 Filed 02/21/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -2-

II. WITNESSES FOR HEARING

As requested by the Court, both parties have submitted lists

of possible witnesses for the March 3 hearing. After reviewing

the lists, the Court hereby limits Plaintiffs' witnesses to those

who are named; the anonymous witnesses (Mother 1, Mother 3, Father

2, Father 3, and Wife 1) will not be necessary to resolving the

issues that will be before the Court at the hearing. The parties

may, however, refer to any affidavits submitted by these

witnesses.

III. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion

to File Reply Declaration of Mother Containing Personal

Identifying Information Under Seal is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED

IN PART. In addition, Plaintiffs' witnesses for the March 3

hearing are to conform to the above-stated parameters. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 21, 2008

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-03758-SC Document 142 Filed 02/21/08 Page 2 of 2