Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00836/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00836-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN DANIEL BLYMAN,

 Petitioner,

v.

WARDEN,

 Respondent.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00836-LJO-BAM HC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS 

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 

A COURT ORDER

(Doc. 21)

RESPONSE DUE IN FIFTEEN DAYS

Petitioner Stephen Daniel Blyman is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of 

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 12, 2015, this Court granted Petitioner’s 

motion for stay and abeyance, directing Petitioner to file a status report within sixty days and to file 

status reports every ninety days thereafter. Although more than ninety days have elapsed since his 

last submission of a status report on August 3, 2015, Petitioner has failed to file a status report.

The Court has discretion to impose any and all sanctions authorized by statute or rule or 

within the inherent power of the Court, including dismissing the action, based on a petitioner’s 

failure to comply with a court order. F.R.Civ.P. 11; Local R. 110.

Accordingly, the Court hereby orders that:

1. Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, petitioner shall file a 

written response to the Court, showing cause why the case should not be dismissed for 

Case 1:14-cv-00836-DAD-SKO Document 27 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Petitioner’s failure to obey the Court’s order of February 12, 2015. Submission of the 

required status report shall be deemed compliance with this requirement.

2. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this order to Petitioner’s address, along with 

a copy of the Court’s February 12, 2015, order (Doc. 21).

3. Petitioner’s failure to comply with this order top show cause will result in the 

dismissal of this action without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 16, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00836-DAD-SKO Document 27 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 2