Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01762/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01762-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMEKO N. MORROW-BERNARD,

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CAROLYN COLVIN, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: 16-cv-01762 YGR

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY

CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FOR ALL PURPOSES

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to 

reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. 

See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). This option is being made available because the magistrate judges in this 

district have smaller civil dockets and no felony criminal cases and may be able to adjudicate this 

case more expeditiously than the undersigned district judge. 

Accordingly, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than May 27, 

2016, whether they consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant 

action. Normally the parties would be directed to so inform the court in their Joint Case 

Management Statement filed in connection with the initial case management conference. However, 

because this case involves a review of an administrative record, a case management conference has 

not been scheduled. For the parties’ convenience, a consent form is attached hereto; forms are also 

available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section. The parties are further advised 

that they may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2016 

 _________________________________________ 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

 

Case 4:16-cv-01762-YGR Document 7 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMEKO N. MORROW-BERNARD,

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CAROLYN COLVIN, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: 16-cv-01762 YGR

CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A UNITED 

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. Section 636(c), the undersigned party or 

parties to the above-captioned civil matter hereby voluntarily consent to have a United States 

Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial, and order the 

entry of a final judgment. Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 

______________________________ ______________________________ 

______________________________ ______________________________ 

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

Dated:_________________________

Case 4:16-cv-01762-YGR Document 7 Filed 05/03/16 Page 2 of 2