Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00784/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00784-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID WHITE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

TOM HANSEN, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 05-784 SBA

ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTIONS

[Docket Nos. 8 & 9]

On March 3, 2005, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint and Motion for a

More Definite Statement and noticed the motions for hearing on April 12, 2005 [Docket Nos. 8 & 9]. On

April 6, 2005, Plaintiff amended his Complaint for the first time [Docket No. 14]. A plaintiff may amend

his complaint once, as of right, any time prior to the filing of responsive pleadings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). 

A motion to dismiss a complaint is not a responsive pleading. Miles v. Dep't of Army, 881 F.2d 777, 781

(9th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and Motion for a More

Definite Statement are DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Saundra Brown Armstrong 

Dated: 4-21-05 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-00784-SBA Document 15 Filed 04/21/05 Page 1 of 1