Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-3_16-cv-00369/USCOURTS-almd-3_16-cv-00369-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

THE LISLE COMPANY, et al.,

 Defendants, 

*

*

*

*

*

CASE NO. 3:16-cv-369-CDL-GMB 

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

 This matter is before the Court pursuant to a Report and 

Recommendation by the United States Magistrate Judge entered on 

December 7, 2016. Neither party has filed an objection to this 

Recommendation as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and 

therefore, the Court reviews the Recommendation for clear error. 

Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Recommendation of 

the Magistrate Judge and makes it the order of this Court. 

SO ORDERED, January 9, 2017. 

 s/Clay D. Land 

 CLAY D. LAND 

 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 3:16-cv-00369-CDL-GMB Document 37 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 1