Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02117/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02117-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARRIEM B. SHAHEED, 

Petitioner, 

 v.

A. P. KANE, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

No. C 06-2117 WHA (PR) 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

(Docket No. 40)

This is a habeas case brought pro se by a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C. 2254. The

petition was dismissed on February 2, 2007, because it was filed nearly five years after

expiration of the statute of limitations. The ruling rejected petitioner’s contention that the

purported violations of his constitutional rights at trial excused him from complying with the

limitations deadline. This Court declined to issue a certificate of appealability, as did the

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On June 1, 2009, more than two years

after entry of judgment, petitioner filed the motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule

60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion was denied on July 31, 2009.

On August 18, 2009, petitioner mailed a “Petition For Rehearing En Banc” to the

Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals the motion to this court for filing without

explanation. The clerk has filed the motion herein as a motion for reconsideration. To the

extent petitioner seeks reconsideration of the dismissal of this matter, the motion is denied for

the reasons set forth in the order dated July 31, 2009, in which lief from judgment was denied. 

Case 3:06-cv-02117-WHA Document 41 Filed 01/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

To the extent he seeks reconsideration of the denial of the motion for relief from judgment,

petitioner has set forth no valid grounds for such reconsideration. Accordingly, the motion

for reconsideration (docket number 40) is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11 , 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

G:\PRO-SE\WHA\HC.06\SHAHEED117.REC.wpd 

Case 3:06-cv-02117-WHA Document 41 Filed 01/11/10 Page 2 of 2