Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-04066/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-04066-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Breach of Contract

---

Case No. 15-cv-04066 NC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PEPPER, N.A.,

Plaintiff,

v.

EXPANDI, INC., and 

NETPARTNERING LIMITED,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-04066 NC 

[DRAFT] VERDICT FORM

When answering the following questions and filling out this Verdict Form, please 

follow the directions provided throughout the form. Your answer to each question must be 

unanimous. Some of the questions contain legal terms that are explained in the Jury 

Instructions. Please refer to the Jury Instructions if you are unsure about the meaning of 

any legal term that appears in the questions below.

We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions:

Case 5:15-cv-04066-NC Document 98 Filed 05/15/16 Page 1 of 3
Case No. 15-cv-04066 NC 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

1. Did plaintiff prove by a preponderance of evidence that it entered into 

a joint venture with NetPartnering Ltd.?

Yes _____ No _____

If you answered yes, answer Questions 2 and 3. 

If you answered no, skip to Question 4.

2. Did plaintiff prove by a preponderance of evidence that 

NetPartnering Ltd. breached a joint venture agreement?

Yes _____ No _____

3. Did plaintiff prove by a preponderance of evidence that 

NetPartnering Ltd. breached a fiduciary duty?

Yes _____ No _____

4. Did plaintiff prove by a preponderance of evidence its claim for 

unjust enrichment?

Expandi, Inc. Yes _____ No _____

NetPartnering Ltd. Yes _____ No _____

5. Did plaintiff prove by a preponderance of evidence its claim for 

common count?

Expandi, Inc. Yes _____ No _____

NetPartnering Ltd. Yes _____ No _____

6. Did plaintiff prove by a preponderance of evidence that one or both 

defendants engaged in unlawful or fraudulent business practices?

Expandi, Inc. Yes _____ No _____

NetPartnering Ltd. Yes _____ No _____

If you answered Yes to any of the above questions, please proceed to questions 7 and 8.

If you answered No to all of the questions above, answer no further questions, and have 

the presiding juror sign and date this form.

Case 5:15-cv-04066-NC Document 98 Filed 05/15/16 Page 2 of 3
Case No. 15-cv-04066 NC 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

DAMAGES

7. If you answered yes to any of the above questions, what are plaintiff’s 

damages against each defendant? 

Only fill out a number if you answered yes to the corresponding claim above.

Question Claim NetPartnering 

Ltd.

Expandi Inc.

2 Breach of Joint Venture

Agreement 

Not applicable

3 Breach of Fiduciary Duty Not applicable

4 Unjust Enrichment 

5 Common Count 

6 Unfair Business Practices Act 

8. Do you award punitive damages?

Expandi, Inc. Yes, in the amount of _______ No _______

NetPartnering Ltd. Yes, in the amount of _______ No _______

Signed: _______________________ Dated: __________________

Presiding Juror

After this verdict form has been signed, notify the courtroom deputy that you are 

ready to present your verdict in the courtroom.

Case 5:15-cv-04066-NC Document 98 Filed 05/15/16 Page 3 of 3