Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-00790/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-00790-45/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR BOSTON 

SCIENTIFIC’S OBJECTIONS TO CORDIS’S BILL OF COSTS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

William F. Lee (admitted in N.D. Cal.)

Dominic E. Massa (admitted pro hac vice)

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 

60 State Street 

Boston, Massachusetts 02109 

Telephone: (617) 526-6000 

Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 

Mark D. Selwyn (SBN 244180) 

Nathan L. Walker (SBN 206128) 

Christine Duh (SBN 228544) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 

1117 California Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 858-6000 

Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants,

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.,

SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC., and

SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., 

SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC. and 

SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

JOHNSON & JOHNSON and CORDIS 

CORPORATION, 

 Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 02-0790 SI 

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING THE 

SCHEDULE FOR BOSTON 

SCIENTIFIC’S OBJECTIONS TO 

CORDIS’S BILL OF COSTS 

CORDIS CORPORATION 

 Counterclaim Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., 

SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC. and 

SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH, 

 Counterclaim Defendants. 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 825 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 832 Filed 01/15/08 Page 1 of 4
2 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR BOSTON 

SCIENTIFIC’S OBJECTIONS TO CORDIS’S BILL OF COSTS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston Scientific 

SciMed, Inc., SciMed Life Systems, Inc., and Schneider (Europe) GmbH (collectively, “Boston 

Scientific”) and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Cordis Corporation and Defendant Johnson 

& Johnson (collectively, “Cordis”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and 

agree as follows: 

1. The Court initially entered judgment on Cordis’s behalf on November 1, 2007 (Docket 

No. 795). 

2. On November 9, 2007, the parties requested that this Court vacate said judgment so that 

the parties would have sufficient time to brief numerous post-trial issues. (Docket No. 799). 

3. On November 13, 2007, the Court granted the parties’ motion, vacated the November 1, 

2007 judgment, and ordered post-trial briefing to be filed on December 14, 2007. (Docket No. 

800).

4. On December 14, 2007, Cordis submitted a Bill of Costs for this matter. (Docket Nos. 

819–820).

5. To remove any scheduling ambiguity arising from the vacated judgment, the parties have 

agreed that if Cordis is the “prevailing party” after the Court’s ruling on the parties’ post-trial 

motions, then Boston Scientific will file its Civil Local Rule 54-2 objections to Cordis’s Bill of 

Costs within ten (10) days of the entry of such judgment. If Boston Scientific is the “prevailing 

party” after the Court’s ruling on the parties’ post-trial motions, then Boston Scientific will file its 

Civil Local Rule 54-1 Bill of Costs within fourteen (14) days of the entry of such judgment and 

Cordis will file its Civil Local Rule 54-2 objections within ten (10) days after service of Boston 

Scientific’s Bill of Costs. 

Now, therefore, based on the foregoing stipulation and agreement, the parties jointly move 

the Court to enter the Proposed Order set forth below. 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 825 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 832 Filed 01/15/08 Page 2 of 4
3 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR BOSTON 

SCIENTIFIC’S OBJECTIONS TO CORDIS’S BILL OF COSTS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

By: /S/ Dominic E. Massa1

 Dominic E. Massa (pro have vice) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND 

DORR LLP 

60 State Street 

Boston, MA 02109 

Telephone: (617) 526-6000 

Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim 

Defendants BOSTON SCIENTIFIC 

CORPORATION, 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.,

SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC., and

SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH. 

By: /S/ Teague I. Donahey 

 Teague I. Donahey (SBN 197531) 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California St. 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Attorneys for Defendants JOHNSON & 

JOHNSON and CORDIS CORPORATION 

1

 Pursuant to General Order 45(X), I, Dominic E. Massa, hereby certify that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from Teague I. Donahey. 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 825 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 3 of 4 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 832 Filed 01/15/08 Page 3 of 4
4 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR BOSTON 

SCIENTIFIC’S OBJECTIONS TO CORDIS’S BILL OF COSTS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Having received and reviewed the Joint Stipulation Regarding the Schedule for Boston 

Scientific’s Objections to Cordis’s Bill of Costs, and good cause appearing therefore, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. If Cordis is the “prevailing party” after the Court’s ruling on the parties’ post-trial 

motions, then Boston Scientific will file its Civil Local Rule 54-2 objections to Cordis’s Bill of 

Costs within ten (10) days of the entry of such judgment. 

2. If Boston Scientific is the “prevailing party” after the Court’s ruling on the parties’ posttrial motions, then Boston Scientific will file its Civil Local Rule 54-1 Bill of Costs within fourteen 

(14) days of the entry of such judgment and Cordis will file its Civil Local Rule 54-2 objections 

within ten (10) days after service of Boston Scientific’s Bill of Costs. 

DATED: January ___, 2008 

 ________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 825 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 4 of 4 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 832 Filed 01/15/08 Page 4 of 4