Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01395/USCOURTS-ca4-16-01395-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1395

KEVIN C. KLIK,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

VERIZON VIRGINIA, INC., a/k/a VERIZON VA; VERIZON SERVICES 

CORP.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior

District Judge. (6:15-cv-00002-NKM-JCH)

Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 12, 2016

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin E. Williams, MEL WILLIAMS PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellant. Betty S.W. Graumlich, REED SMITH LLP, Richmond, 

Virginia; Kim M. Watterson, REED SMITH LLP, Pittsburgh, 

Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1395 Doc: 28 Filed: 10/12/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin C. Klik appeals the district court’s order granting 

Defendants’ summary judgment motion and denying Klik’s summary 

judgment motion on Klik’s disability discrimination claims, 

brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 

42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 (2012). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s order. See Klik v. Verizon Va., Inc., No. 

6:15-cv-00002-NKM-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2016). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 16-1395 Doc: 28 Filed: 10/12/2016 Pg: 2 of 2