Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01211/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01211-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE HEARING AND TO EXTEND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES 

C.D. Michel – SBN 144258 

Joshua R. Dale – SBN 209942 

Joseph A. Silvoso, III – SBN 248502 

Anna M. Barvir – SBN 268728 

MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

180 East Ocean Blvd., Suite 180 

Long Beach, CA 90802 

Telephone: (562) 216-444 

Facsimile: (5662) 216-4445 

Email: cmichel@michellawyers.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL 

ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, et 

al., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO: 1:14-cv-01211 JAM-SAB 

STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO 

CONTINUE HEARING AND TO EXTEND 

ASSOCIATED DEADLINES; ORDER 

(Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A); 

Local Rules 144, 230(f)) 

 

 

Case 1:14-cv-01211-JAM-SAB Document 30 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE HEARING AND TO EXTEND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES

I. INTRODUCTION 

The parties, Plaintiff California Rifle and Pistol 

Association and Defendants Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, 

and Explosives, Attorney General Eric Holder, and ATF Director B. 

Todd Jones, through their respective attorneys of record, hereby 

jointly stipulate to continue the date of the hearing for 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, for Summary 

Judgment and to extend the remaining deadlines for filing moving 

papers related to that motion in accordance with the stipulated 

schedule set forth below. 

This request is made pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure and Rules 144 and 230 of the Local Rules of 

the Eastern District of California. 

II. RECITALS / GROUNDS FOR RELIEF 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their initial Complaint in this 

matter on July 31, 2014; 

WHEREAS, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, or 

Alternatively, for Summary Judgment on January 9, 2015; 

WHEREAS, Defendants noticed their Motion to Dismiss, or 

Alternatively, for Summary Judgment for March 25, 2015 at 9:30 

a.m. in the courtroom of the Honorable John A. Mendez; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Plaintiff must file 

its Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or 

Alternatively, for Summary Judgment on or before March 11, 2015; 

WHEREAS, Local Rule 144(a) of this Court allows a 28-day 

extension of time for responding to complaints and filing certain 

other documents by initial stipulation of the parties without 

Case 1:14-cv-01211-JAM-SAB Document 30 Filed 03/09/15 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE HEARING AND TO EXTEND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES

approval of the court, but states that “[a]ll other extensions of 

time must be approved by the Court”; 

WHEREAS, Rule 6(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure allows for the extension of time for good cause, “if a 

request is made, before the original time or its extension 

expires”; 

WHEREAS, good cause for an extension of time is shown in 

that Plaintiff is currently considering voluntary dismissal of 

this matter and has expressed such to Defendants; 

WHEREAS, the continuance and extension requested herein will 

conserve both the Court’s and all parties’ time and resources and 

promote judicial economy by attempting to avoid the preparation 

and consideration of unnecessary briefing and argument on 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, for Summary 

Judgment; 

WHEREAS, both parties to this action seek to keep the costs 

of litigation as low as reasonably possible; 

WHEREAS, this request for continuance and extension is made 

in good faith, and it is not for the purpose of unnecessary 

delay; and 

WHEREAS, neither party has obtained an extension of time 

relating to any matter for which this extension is sought. 

THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING: 

1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or 

Alternatively, for Summary Judgment shall be continued to May 6, 

2015 at 9:30 a.m.; 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 1:14-cv-01211-JAM-SAB Document 30 Filed 03/09/15 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4 

STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE HEARING AND TO EXTEND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES

2. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss, or Alternatively, for Summary Judgment shall be due on 

or before April 10, 2015; and 

3. Defendants’ Reply in support of their motion shall be 

due on or before April 29, 2015. 

The parties hereby jointly request that this Court grant the 

relief sought by this stipulation. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Date: March 6, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

/s/ C. D. Michel 

C. D. Michel 

Attorney for Plaintiff California 

Rifle and Pistol Association 

Date: March 6, 2015 U.S. Department of Justice

 

/s/ Lisa A. Olson (as approved on 

03/06/15) 

Lisa A. Olson 

Attorney for Defendants Bureau of 

Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and 

Explosives, Eric Holder, and B. 

Todd Jones 

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 3/9/2015 

 /s/ John A. Mendez______________ 

 U. S. District Court Judge 

Case 1:14-cv-01211-JAM-SAB Document 30 Filed 03/09/15 Page 4 of 4