Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-01291/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-01291-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 120
Nature of Suit: Marine Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1333 Admiralty

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRITON CONTAINER INTERNATIONAL

LIMITED,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DI GREGORIO NAVEGACAO LTDA., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-99-1291 MMC

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED

FORM OF INJUNCTION

On April 21, 2006, the Court ordered plaintiff to submit a proposed form of injunction

consistent with the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, filed March 15, 2006, and mandate, filed April 17,

2006. Later that day, the Court received plaintiff’s proposed Order Instructing Defendants

to File Petition in Brazilian Court. The English translation of the subject petition provides

that Di Gregorio Navegacao Ltda. “shall bear any and all expenses related to [the Brazilian]

action, including those incurred by Triton Container International Limited, as well as

attorney’s fees to be determined by [the Brazilian court] according to Article 20, fourth

paragraph, of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code.” (See Donovan Decl. Ex. B.) The Ninth

Circuit’s decision is silent with respect to plaintiff’s entitlement to fees and costs in the

Brazilian action, however, and, other than the above-referenced citation, plaintiff has

submitted no authority that it is entitled to such fees and costs.

Case 3:99-cv-01291-MMC Document 151 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that plaintiff, no later than May 5, 2006, shall submit

either (1) a revised proposed form of order deleting the provision for fees and costs; or (2)

a supplemental memorandum, with citations to relevant authority, demonstrating that it is

entitled to an order from this Court requiring defendants to pay the fees and costs plaintiff

incurred in the Brazilian action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 25, 2006 MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:99-cv-01291-MMC Document 151 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 2