Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00686/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00686-58/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

369452.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING

CERTAIN EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES C05 00686 SBA (EMC)

MARTIN R. GLICK (No. 40187)

Email: mglick@howardrice.com

BOBBIE J. WILSON (No. 148317)

Email: bwilson@howardrice.com

HOWHOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY

FALK & RABKIN

A Professional Corporation

Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4024

Telephone: 415/434-1600

Facsimile: 415/217-5910

MORTON AMSTER (pro hac vice)

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO (pro hac vice)

KENNETH M. BERNSTEIN (pro hac vice)

CHARLES R. MACEDO (pro hac vice)

AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN, LLP

90 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10016

Telephone: 212/336-8000

Facsimile: 212/336-8001

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs

VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD. and JVC

COMPONENTS (THAILAND) CO., LTD., and Defendants

AGILIS INC. and AGILIS TECHNOLOGY INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

NIDEC CORPORATION

Plaintiff,

v.

VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD., JVC

COMPONENTS (THAILAND) CO., LTD.,

AGILIS INC., and AGILIS TECHNOLOGY

INC.,

Defendants,

NIDEC AMERICA CORPORATION and

NIDEC SINGAPORE PTE, LTD.,

Additional Defendants on

the Counterclaims.

Case No. C05 00686 SBA (EMC)

Action Filed: February 15, 2005

E-Filing

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONCERNING CERTAIN EXPERT

REPORT DEADLINES

Judge: Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong

Trial Date: September 24, 2007

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 666 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 1 of 4
 Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 669 Filed 05/17/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

369452.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING

CERTAIN EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES C05 00686 SBA (EMC)

-1-

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12 of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings

before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the parties declare

that:

WHEREAS the stipulated discovery schedule below modifies certain expert discovery

deadlines set forth in the Stipulation and Order Re: Discovery Schedule [D.I. 641] executed by

Judge Chen on March 6, 2007 and the Stipulation and Order Concerning Expert Discovery and

Schedule [D.I. 663] executed by Judge Chen on April 30, 2007, but does not change the deadlines

for dispositive motions, the pretrial conference or trial or otherwise modify the Order for Pretrial

Preparation [D.I. 283] executed by Judge Armstrong on October 25, 2006.

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to modify the discovery deadlines for the limited items

provided below.

The parties stipulate to an order providing the following:

1. The due date for the parties’ expert reports that were previously due on May 10 and 14,

2007, be extended until May 16, 2007.

2. Nidec’s rebuttal expert report(s) relating to alleged damages suffered by Nidec (other

than alleged damages due to price erosion) and JVC’s rebuttal expert report(s) relating to alleged

damages suffered by JVC are due on or before May 17, 2007.

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

Dated: May 14, 2007 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

FRANKLIN BROCKWAY GOWDY

THOMAS D. KOHLER

DAVID C. BOHRER

MICHAEL J. LYONS

DION M. BREGMAN

By: /S/

Dion M. Bregman

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant

NIDEC CORPORATION and Additional

Defendants NIDEC AMERICA

CORPORATION and NIDEC SINGAPORE

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 666 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 2 of 4
 Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 669 Filed 05/17/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

369452.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING

CERTAIN EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES C05 00686 SBA (EMC)

-2-

Dated: May 14, 2007 HOWARD RICK NEMEROVSKI CANADY

FALK & RABKIN

MARTIN R. GLICK, SBN 40187

BOBBIE J. WILSON SBN 148317

AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP

MORTON AMSTER (pro hac vice)

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO (pro hac vice)

KENNETH M. BERNSTEIN (pro hac vice)

CHARLES R. MACEDO (pro hac vice)

By: /S/

Anthony F. Lo Cicero

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs

VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD. and

JVC COMPONENTS (THAILAND) CO., LTD

and Defendants AGILIS INC., and AGILIS

TECHNOLOGY INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 666 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 3 of 4

May 17, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 669 Filed 05/17/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

369452.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING

CERTAIN EXPERT REPORT DEADLINES C05 00686 SBA (EMC)

-3-

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I, Anthony F.

Lo Cicero, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the

other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America

that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 14th day of May 2007, at New York, New York.

/S/

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO

W03 051407-161590001/1387734/v1

Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 666 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 4 of 4
 Case 4:05-cv-00686-SBA Document 669 Filed 05/17/07 Page 4 of 4