Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00809/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00809-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a ) 2:04-cv-00809-GEB-PAN

Washington corporation, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

CALIFORNIA MICRO COMPUTERS, INC., )

a/k/a CA-MICRO a/k/a ADVANCED )

CONCEPTS, a California corporation;)

and JAMES R. SCOTT, an individual, )

)

Defendants. )

)

)

CALIFORNIA MICRO COMPUTERS, INC., )

a/k/a CA-MICRO a/k/a ADVANCED )

CONCEPTS, a California corporation;)

and JAMES R. SCOTT, an individual, )

)

Defendants and )

Third Party Plaintiffs, )

)

v. )

)

GLOBAL TRADING INTERNATIONAL, )

INC., COMPWAVES, )

)

Third Party Defendants. )

)

On July 21, 2005, a Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice

and a Proposed Order were filed, in which the stipulating parties

erroneously assume the federal court will retain jurisdiction to

enforce a “Settlement Agreement and Release between Microsoft and

Case 2:04-cv-00809-GEB-PAN Document 31 Filed 09/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants” which the undersigned judge has not seen. However,

Defendants are dismissed from Microsoft’s Complaint with prejudice as

the parties requested in the July 21 Stipulation, and the Court

retains jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ “Stipulated Permanent

Injunction” which was filed July 21, 2005, and executed by the

undersigned Judge on September 28, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 28, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-00809-GEB-PAN Document 31 Filed 09/29/05 Page 2 of 2