Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

SA N FRA N CI S CO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

ROBERT JON HENDRICKS (SBN 179751)

STEPHEN L. TAEUSCH (SBN 247708)

CAITLIN V. MAY (SBN 293141)

One Market, Spear Street Tower

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: 415.442.1000

Facsimile: 415.442.1001

rhendricks@morganlewis.com

staeusch@morganlewis.com

cmay@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice

(sliss@llrlaw.com)

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000

Boston, MA 02116

Telephone: (617) 994-5800

Facsimile: (617) 994-5801

MONIQUE OLIVIER (SBN 190385)

(monique@dplolaw.com)

DUCKWORTH, PETERS, LEBOWITZ, OLIVIER LLP

100 Bush Street, Suite 1800

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 433-0333

Facsimile: (415) 449-6556

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, 

DAVID KHAN, MATTHEW MANAHAN, WILSON

ROLLE, JR., and WILLIAM ANDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS 

COLOPY, DAVID KHAN, MATTHEW 

MANAHAN, WILSON ROLLE, JR., and 

WILLIAM ANDERSON, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-03826-EMC

Hon. Edward M. Chen

STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF 

DAVID KHAN WITH PREJUDICE 

PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 143 Filed 09/17/14 Page 1 of 3
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

SA N FRA N CI S CO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC

This stipulation is entered into pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, by and between Plaintiff David Khan (“Khan”) and Defendant Uber 

Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) (collectively, the “Parties”). 

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the Parties to this 

Stipulation, through their respective counsel of record, that:

1. The Parties hereby warrant that each person whose signature appears hereon has 

been duly authorized and has full authority to execute this Stipulation on behalf of each of the 

Parties hereto;

2. Khan shall be dismissed with prejudice as a party plaintiff in the above-captioned 

action against Uber pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

3. The Parties shall bear their own respective costs and attorneys’ fees related to and 

associated with the claims alleged by Khan, the litigation of those claims, and the dismissal of 

those claims.

Dated: September 10, 2014 LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

By: /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan

Shannon Liss-Riordan, pro hac vice

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: September 10, 2014 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

By /s/Robert Jon Hendricks

Robert Jon Hendricks

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 143 Filed 09/17/14 Page 2 of 3
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

SA N FRA N CI S CO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC

DB2/ 25302569.1

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Khan is hereby dismissed with prejudice as a party plaintiff in the above-captioned lawsuit 

against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure.

Dated: _________________________________________

Edward M. Chen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9/17/14

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 143 Filed 09/17/14 Page 3 of 3