Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04115/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04115-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLAINTIFF 

CALIFORNIA MARKET WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 13CV4115-WHO

Lee Albert (admitted pro hac vice)

Gregory B. Linkh (admitted pro hac vice)

GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP

122 East 42nd Street, Suite 2920

New York, NY 10168

Telephone: 212- 682-5340

EMAIL: lalbert@glancylaw.com

glinkh@glancylaw.com

Christopher L. Lebsock (State Bar No. 184546)

HAUSFELD LLP

600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3200 

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: 415-633-1908

Email: clebsock@hausfeldllp.com

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs

[Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE KOREAN RAMEN ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: 

Direct Purchaser Action

Case No. 3:13-cv-04115-WHO

STIPULATION REGARDING 

CONTINUANCE OF HEARING OF 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW OF 

PLAINTIFF CALIFORNIA MARKET 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND

ORDER

Date: March 9, 2016

Time: 2:00 p.m.

 Judge: Honorable William H. Orrick

Case 3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document 315 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 5
1

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLAINTIFF CALIFORNIA 

MARKET WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 13CV4115-WHO

The Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) in the above-captioned consolidated action 

(the “Action”), and Defendants Nongshim Co. Ltd. Nongshim America, Inc., Ottogi Co. Ltd. and 

Ottogi America Inc. (“Defendants”) by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as 

follows:

Recitals

1. WHEREAS, on January 22, 2016, Plaintiffs moved to withdraw, without prejudice, 

California Market, LLC d/b/a Gaju Market (“California Market”).[Dkt. No. 287].

2. WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, Defendants opposed this motion, and Defendants 

requested that such dismissal be conditioned on the Court ordering California Market to provide 

any outstanding document production [Dkt. 292]. 

3. WHEREAS, California Market has subsequently indicated that it has conducted a 

search for responsive documents and had not been able to locate any thus far.

4. WHEREAS, California Market states that its search for responsive documents is 

expected to be completed in the next two weeks.

5. WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) and 7-7(b)(1), the parties have not 

previously stipulated to continue the hearing date, and the parties now wish to stipulate in writing 

to continue the hearing date.

Case 3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document 315 Filed 03/07/16 Page 2 of 5
STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLAINTIFF CALIFORNIA MARKET 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 13CV4115-WHO

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The parties agree to continue the hearing in this matter until April 6, 2016.

2. Upon completion of the document search if any responsive documents are located, 

such documents will be produced on or before March 31, 2016. 

3. If issues concerning California Market’s document production are resolved 

informally, the parties will enter into an additional stipulation agreeing to dismiss California 

Market without prejudice.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document 315 Filed 03/07/16 Page 3 of 5
3

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLAINTIFF CALIFORNIA 

MARKET WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 13CV4115-WHO

DATED: March 7, 2016

_/s/ Gregory B. Linkh_______________________

Lee Albert (admitted pro hac vice)

Gregory B. Linkh (admitted pro hac vice)

GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP

122 East 42nd Street, Suite 2920

New York, NY 10168

TEL: (212) 682-5340

lalbert@glancylaw.com

glinkh@glancylaw.com

Christopher L. Lebsock (State Bar No. 184546)

HAUSFELD LLP

600 Montgomery Street 

Suite 3200 

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: 415-633-1908

clebsock@hausfeldllp.com

Interim Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser 

Plaintiffs

DATED: February ___, 2016

Case 3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document 315 Filed 03/07/16 Page 4 of 5
STIPULATION REGARDING WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFF CALIFORNIA MARKET WITHOUT PREJUDICE

4

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: March 7, 2016 __/s/ Mark C. Dosker_________________________

Mark C. Dosker (State Bar No. 114789)

Anne C. Goodwin (State Bar No. 216244)

Kate E. Kim (admitted pro hac vice)

SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2600

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 954-0200

Facsimile: (415) 393-9887

mark.dosker@squirepb.com

anne.goodwin@squirepb.com

kate.kim@squirepb.com

Attorneys for Defendants Nongshim America, Inc., 

and Nongshim Co., Ltd.

DATED: March 7, 2016 __/s/ Joel S. Sanders_______________________

Joel S. Sanders (State Bar No. 107234)

Minae Yu (State Bar No. 268814)

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000

San Francisco, CA 94105-2933

Telephone: (415) 393-8200

Facsimile: (415) 393-8206

jsanders@gibsondunn.com

myu@gibsondunn.com

Attorneys for Defendants Ottogi America, Inc. and

Ottogi Company, Ltd.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 7, 2016 _____________________________

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-04115-WHO Document 315 Filed 03/07/16 Page 5 of 5