Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03494/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-03494-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 240
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MICHAEL E BOYD,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

TREASURY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-03494-BLF 

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO 

EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES

[Re: ECF 106]

Due to a scheduling conflict with another state court proceeding, Plaintiff Michael E. Boyd 

has requested leave to extend the deadline to file his opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss, 

as well as to extend the deadlines for Defendants to file their replies. ECF 106. Out of the four

pending motions to dismiss, oppositions for two of the motions are due on November 29, 2016, 

one is due on December 1, 2016, and another is due on December 2, 2016. The respective replies 

are due on December 6, 2016, December 8, 2016, and December 9, 2016. Plaintiff Boyd 

requested leave to file a common opposition by the due date of December 9, 2016 and for 

Defendants to file their respective replies on December 16, 2016. ECF 106. 

The Court finds that Plaintiff Boyd has shown good cause for this extension and 

Defendants also do not oppose this application for leave. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS 

Plaintiff Boyd leave to extend the briefing deadlines. The deadline to file a common opposition to 

all four pending motions to dismiss is RESET to December 9, 2016 and the Defendants’ 

respective replies shall be filed before or on December 16, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 29, 2016

 ______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-03494-BLF Document 109 Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 1