Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01402/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01402-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 

NANCY JUNE NOVAK, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY OF MERCED, A MUNICIPAL 

CORPORATION, MERCED POLICE 

OFFICER RASMUSSEN (#161), 

INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS 

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A POLICE 

OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF MERCED, 

SGT. STRUBLE (ID #UNKNOWN), 

INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS 

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A POLICE 

SERGEANT FOR THE CITY OF 

MERCED, OFFICER CHAVEZ (#156), 

INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS 

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A POLICY 

OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF MERCED, 

THE MENTOR NETWORK, LOYD’S 

LIBERTY HOMES, INC., A 

MASSATUCHETS CORPORATION 

DOING BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA, 

CHRISTINA TRIGG, AN INDIVIDUAL, 

JOELLA BREWER, AN INDIVIDUAL, 

CARE MERIDIAN CORPORATION, 

AND DOES 1-50, inclusive, 

 Defendants.

Case No.: 1:13-CV-01402- BAM

Action Filed: Aug. 30, 2013 

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER 

ORDER ADOPTING THE PARTIES’ 

STIPULATION (DOC. 38) IN PART 

 Plaintiff, NANCY JUNE NOVAK, by and through her attorney of record, 

Case 1:13-cv-01402-BAM Document 39 Filed 02/04/15 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Timothy V. Magill, Esq. of Magill Law Offices in Fresno, California, and Defendants, 

THE MENTOR NETWORK, LOYD’S LIBERTY HOMES, CHRISTINA TRIGG, and 

JOELLA BREWER, by and through their attorney for record, Douglas C. Smith, Esq. of 

Riverside, California, and Defendants, MERCED POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER 

RASMUSSEN, SGT. STRUBLE, and OFFICER CHAVEZ, by and through their 

attorney of record, Dale Long Allen, Jr., Esq. of San Francisco, California, hereby 

Stipulate and agree to extend the Briefing Schedule filed May 8, 2014, by sixty (60) days, 

as listed below: 

 Current New

Expert Disclosure Feb. 2, 2015 April 2, 2015 

Supp. Expert Disclosure Feb. 23, 2015 April 23, 2015 

Non-Expert Discovery Cut-off Feb. 27, 2015 April 27, 2015 

Expert Discovery Cut-off March 15, 2015 May 15, 2015 

Non-dispositive Filing Deadline March 30, 2015 May 30, 2015 

Pre-trial Motion Filing Deadline May 18, 2015 July 18, 2015 

DATED: February 3, 2015. MAGILL LAW OFFICES 

 By: _____/s/ Timothy V. Magill________ 

 Timothy V. Magill, Esq. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, 

 NANCY JUNE NOVAK 

Case 1:13-cv-01402-BAM Document 39 Filed 02/04/15 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: February 3, 2015. SMITH LAW OFFICES 

 By: _____/s/ Douglas C. Smith__________ 

 Douglas Charles Smith, Esq. 

 Attorney for Defendants, 

 THE MENTOR NEWTWORK, 

LOYD’S LIBERTY HOMES, 

CHRISTINA TRIGG 

and JOELLA BREWER 

DATED: February 3, 2015. ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD, 

 WERTH 

 By: ______/s/ Dale L. Allen, Jr.__________ 

 Dale Long Allen, Jr., Esq. 

 Attorney for Defendants, 

 MERCED POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

OFFICER RASMUSSEN, SGT. 

STRUBLE, and OFFICER CHAVEZ

ORDER 

The parties’ stipulation filed on February 3, 2015 (Doc. 38) outlined above is adopted by 

the Court IN PART. The new deadlines are outlined as follows: 

 

Expert Disclosure April 2, 2015 

Supp. Expert Disclosure April 23, 2015 

Non-Expert Discovery Cut-off April 27, 2015 

Expert Discovery Cut-off May 15, 2015 

Pre-trial Motion Filing Deadline June 15, 2015 

Case 1:13-cv-01402-BAM Document 39 Filed 02/04/15 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties are advised that at this stage of the proceedings extension of the nondispositive motion deadline as proposed is unnecessary. Non-expert and expert discovery 

deadlines have been extended and the associated motions to compel are tied to these deadlines. 

Compliance with these non-expert and expert discovery deadlines requires motions to compel be 

filed and heard sufficiently in advance of the cutoff so that the Court may grant effective relief 

within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure to have a discovery dispute heard 

sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as untimely. 

Additionally, all other pre-trial motions must be filed no later than June 15, 2015, so that 

the Court has sufficient time to rule on the motions prior to the pretrial conference August 26, 

2015. 

All of other orders contained in this Court’s scheduling order issued on May 8, 2014 

(Doc. 36) remain in full force and effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 4, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:13-cv-01402-BAM Document 39 Filed 02/04/15 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 1:13-cv-01402-BAM Document 39 Filed 02/04/15 Page 5 of 5