Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00525/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00525-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

VOGEL, et al.,

Defendants.

1:13-cv-00525-AWI-SKO (PC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR 

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS 

(Docs. 81, 107, 114, 125)

Plaintiff, Durrell Anthony Puckett, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action on claims against Defendants Sanchez, Vogel, and Johnson 

for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment; against Defendants Sanchez, Vogel, Johnson, 

Dean, Bolander, Abadia, Lockhart, Zamora, Sisneros, Campos, and Callow for excessive force in 

violation of the Eighth Amendment; and against Defendants Sanchez, Vogel, and Johnson for 

violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Plaintiff filed motions seeking temporary restraining orders and transfer from CSPCorcoran to CSP-Sacramento. (Docs. 81, 107, 114.) On September 2, 2016, the Magistrate 

Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations to deny both motions. (Doc. 125.) The Findings 

and Recommendations was served on that same date and provided thirty days for the parties to 

Case 1:13-cv-00525-AWI-SKO Document 126 Filed 09/21/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

file objections. (Id.) Despite lapse of more than the allowed time, no objections were filed.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, issued on September 2, 2016 (Doc. 125), is 

adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff’s motions for temporary restraining orders, filed on December 28, 2015 (Doc. 

81), April 21, 2016 (Doc. 107), and May 16, 2016 (Doc. 114) are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 21, 2016 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

 

1

It is noted that, since issuance of the Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff has been moved to CSP-Sacramento.

Case 1:13-cv-00525-AWI-SKO Document 126 Filed 09/21/16 Page 2 of 2