Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00157/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00157-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Because oral argument will not be of material assistance, 1

the Court deemed this matter suitable for decision without oral

argument. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230 (g). 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESLIE H. IMADA, No. 2:10-cv-00157-MCE-GGH

Plaintiff,

v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ONEWEST BANK, FSB, et al.,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

This action arises out of a mortgage loan transaction in

which Plaintiff Weslie H. Imada (“Plaintiff”) refinanced his home

in February 2007. Presently before the Court is a Motion by

Defendants OneWest Bank FSB and Mortgage Electronic Registration

Systems, Inc. (“Defendants”) to Dismiss the claims alleged

against them in Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has failed to file an 1

Opposition. 

Case 2:10-cv-00157-MCE -GGH Document 18 Filed 05/12/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On April 26, 2010, the parties filed a Stipulation to take

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss off calendar. Said stipulation

fails to address whether the Motion to Dismiss is withdrawn or

still pending. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 83(b), the stipulation is stricken as vague. 

On April 23, 2010, Plaintiff late-filed a First Amended

Complaint. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

15(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff’s authority to amend his pleading as a

matter of course expired twenty-one (21) days after Defendants’

Motion to Dismiss was filed. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint

was not timely filed and is hereby stricken.

In light of no opposition filed by Plaintiff, Defendants’

Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED with leave to amend. 

Plaintiff may file an amended complaint not later than

twenty (20) days after the date this Memorandum and Order is

filed electronically. If no amended complaint is filed within

said twenty (20)-day period, without further notice, Plaintiff’s

claims will be dismissed without leave to amend.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 11, 2010

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-00157-MCE -GGH Document 18 Filed 05/12/10 Page 2 of 2