Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02304/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02304-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY MOSLEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2304 MCE KJM P

vs.

J. ROHLFING, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On August 25, 2006 defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. 

Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file

written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any

opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” 

Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.” 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the

date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the August 25, 2006 motion for

summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of nonCase 2:05-cv-02304-MCE -KJM Document 17 Filed 11/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: November 14, 2006. 

/mp

mosl2304.46osc

Case 2:05-cv-02304-MCE -KJM Document 17 Filed 11/15/06 Page 2 of 2