Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02175/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02175-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION TO EXTEND LITIGATION DEADLINES;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C06 2175 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John V. Picone III (#187226/Picone@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello Street, Suite 500

Redwood City, CA 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Attorneys for Defendant

GESTURETEK, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

REACTRIX SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

GESTURETEK, INC.

Defendant.

Case No. C06 2175 SI

STIPULATION TO EXTEND

LITIGATION DEADLINES PURSUANT

TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 6-2 AND 7-12;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREFORE, Reactrix Systems, Inc. (“Reactrix”) filed its complaint on March 24, 2006;

WHEREFORE, GestureTek, Inc. (“GestureTek”) and Reactrix have agreed to engage in

substantive negotiations in an attempt to settle the present dispute, and have agreed to extend

current litigation deadlines by sixty (60) days to conduct those negotiations. GestureTek and

Reactrix have agreed to extend the following deadlines, as follows:

Action Current Deadline Stipulated Extension

GestureTek’s Answer May 10, 2006 [Proposed: July 10, 2006]

Last day to meet and confer

re early settlement, initial

disclosures, and ADR, etc.

July 3, 2006 [Proposed: September 1, 2006]

Last day to complete initial

disclosures

July 17, 2006 [Proposed: September 15, 2006]

Case Management

Conference

July 28, 2006 [Proposed: September 29, 2006]

/ / /

Case 3:06-cv-02175-SI Document 12 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:06-cv-02175-SI Document 13 Filed 05/12/06 Page 1 of 2
2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND LITIGATION DEADLINES;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C06 2175 SI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREFORE, there have been no previous time modifications in this case;

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request the Court to adopt the above-stated schedule;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the parties adhere to the extended schedule listed above.

Dated: May 8, 2006 HELLER EHRMAN LLP

By: \s\ Kurt M. Kjelland

Kurt M. Kjelland

Attorneys for Plaintiff

REACTRIX SYSTEMS, INC.

Dated: May 8, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: \s\ John V. Picone III

John V. Picone III

Attorneys for Defendant

GESTURETEK, INC.

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty

of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Kurt M. Kjelland.

Dated: May 8, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: \s\ John V. Picone III

John V. Picone III

Attorneys for Defendant

GESTURETEK, INC.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2006

______________________________________

Hon. Susan Illston

Judge of the United States District Court

50346984.DOC

Case 3:06-cv-02175-SI Document 12 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:06-cv-02175-SI Document 13 Filed 05/12/06 Page 2 of 2