Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01783/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01783-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Yewhala Eshet Abebe, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Katrina Kane, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 09-1783-PHX-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

(“Petition”) (Doc. 4). The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)

(Doc. 15) recommending that the Petition be denied. 

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts

the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not

required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”

(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en

banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s

findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis

in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Based on the foregoing,

Case 2:09-cv-01783-JAT Document 17 Filed 04/05/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15)

is ACCEPTED; accordingly, Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

(Doc. #4) is denied and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 5th day of April, 2011.

Case 2:09-cv-01783-JAT Document 17 Filed 04/05/11 Page 2 of 2