Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-01593/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-01593-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Eugenio Robledo-Barrios, 

Defendant/Movant.

No. CV-14-01593-PHX-SRB (MEA)

 CR-12-01563-PHX-SRB 

ORDER 

 Movant, Eugenio Robledo-Barrios, filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct 

Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on July 14, 2014. The United States filed its 

response in opposition on February 4, 2015. Movant did not file a reply. 

 The Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on March 16, 2015 

recommending that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence be 

denied. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The 

time to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and 

Recommendation have been filed. 

Case 2:14-cv-01593-SRB Document 7 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. 

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the Order of this Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or 

Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability and leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain 

procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable and 

because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

 Dated this 6th day of April, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-01593-SRB Document 7 Filed 04/06/15 Page 2 of 2