Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00611/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00611-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY LEE VOGELSANG,

Case No. 2:03-cv-00611-JKS (HC)

Petitioner,

JUDGMENT

vs.

MIKE KNOWLES, Warden,

Respondent.

The court having entered its Memorandum Decision of even date herewith disposing of

all the issues raised by the Petitioner,

IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the Petition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the court declines to issue a Certificate of

Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (“reasonable

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been

resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve

encouragement to proceed further” (internal quotation marks omitted)). All issues raised in the

petition were addressed by the California Court of Appeal or the California Superior Court in

their respective decisions and no reasonable jurist could find that either decision was

“objectively unreasonable.”

Dated at Anchorage, Alaska this 19th day of June, 2006.

s/ James K. Singleton, Jr.

JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-00611-JKS Document 59 Filed 06/19/06 Page 1 of 1