Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06837/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-06837-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

(Case No. 3:16-cv-06837) 

1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

L AFAYETTE & 

K UMAGAI LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

101 MISSION STREET , SUITE 600 

SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94105 

(415) 357-4600 

F A X (415) 357-4605

LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP 

GARY T. LAFAYETTE (SBN 88666) 

REBECCA K. KIMURA (SBN 220420) 

MELISSA A. DUBBS (SBN 163650) 

1300 Clay Street, Suite 810 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (415) 357-4600 

Facsimile: (415) 357-4605 

Attorneys for Defendant 

XEROX STATE & LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MICHELLE KELLY, an individual, on 

behalf of herself and those similarly 

situated,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BAY AREA TOLL AUTHORITY; 

GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY 

AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT; 

XEROX STATE AND LOCAL 

SOLUTIONS, INC.; and DOES 1-100, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:16-cv-06837-RS 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Action Filed: September 7, 2016 

Action Removed: November 28, 2016

Amended Complaint Filed: February 3, 2017 

STIPULATION 

Plaintiff Michelle Kelly (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants XEROX STATE AND LOCAL 

SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Xerox”), BAY AREA TOLL AUTHORITY ("BATA") and GOLDEN 

GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ("the District") 

(collectively “Defendants”) (collectively referred to as the “Parties”) through their respective 

counsel hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed an Amended Class Action Complaint (“Amended Complaint”) 

on February 3, 2017; 

Case 3:16-cv-06837-RS Document 37 Filed 02/16/17 Page 1 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

(Case No. 3:16-cv-06837) 

2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

L AFAYETTE & 

K UMAGAI LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

101 MISSION STREET , SUITE 600 

SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94105 

(415) 357-4600 

F A X (415) 357-4605

WHEREAS, Defendants’ responses to the Amended Complaint are due February 17, 

2017; 

WHEREAS, each of the Defendants intend to file a Motion to Dismiss the Amended 

Complaint (collectively, the “Motions”) and seek a short extension of time to file their Motions to 

February 24, 2017; 

WHEREAS pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3, the 

Parties agree that this Motion involves several questions of law requiring an extended period by 

which the parties may respond and reply; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rules 

7-2 and 7-3, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties that: 

1. Defendants’ time to respond to the Amended Complaint and file Motions shall be 

extended to February 24, 2017; 

2. Plaintiff’s oppositions to the Motions shall be filed on or before March 17, 2017; 

3. Defendants’ replies in support of their Motions shall be filed on or before April 6, 

2017; 

4. The hearing on the Motions shall be scheduled for April 20, 2017. 

DATED: February 15, 2017 LINDEMANN LAW FIRM, APC 

 /s/ Blake J. Lindemann___________________ 

BLAKE J. LINDEMANN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MICHELLE KELLY 

DATED: February 15, 2017 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP 

 /s/ Rebecca K. Kimura 

REBECCA K. KIMURA 

Attorney for Defendants 

XEROX STATE AND LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 

Case 3:16-cv-06837-RS Document 37 Filed 02/16/17 Page 2 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS 

(Case No. 3:16-cv-06837) 

3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

L AFAYETTE & 

K UMAGAI LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

101 MISSION STREET , SUITE 600 

SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94105 

(415) 357-4600 

F A X (415) 357-4605

DATED: February 15, 2017 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 

 /s/ Samantha D. Wolff 

SAMANTHA D. WOLFF 

Attorney for Defendants 

GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND 

TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT AND BAY 

AREA TOLL AUTHORITY 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of Blake Lindemann, counsel 

for Plaintiff, and Samantha Wolff, counsel for Defendants Golden Gate Bridge, Highway 

and Transportation District and Bay Area Toll Authority, for the filing of this 

stipulation. 

 /s/ Rebecca K. Kimura 

REBECCA K. KIMURA 

ORDER 

 Good cause appearing therefor and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby 

ORDERED that: 

1. Defendants’ time to respond to the Amended Complaint and file Motions shall be 

extended to February 24, 2017; 

2. Plaintiff’s oppositions to the Motions shall be filed on or before March 17, 2017; 

3. Defendants’ replies in support of their Motions shall be filed on or before April 6, 

2017; 

4. The hearing on the Motions shall be scheduled for April 20, 2017. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ______________, 2017 ____________________________________ 

 RICHARD SEEBORG 

 United States District Judge 

2/16

Case 3:16-cv-06837-RS Document 37 Filed 02/16/17 Page 3 of 3