Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00063/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00063-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 12:635 Breach of Insurance Contract

---

ROBERT W. O'CONNOR, ESQ. (CA #096547)

MARY E. OLDEN (CA #109373)

TODD M. BAILEY (CA#109519)

McDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN PC

Attorneys at Law

555 Capitol Mall, 9th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Phone: 916.444.3900

Fax: 916.442.2780

Attorneys for ST. PAUL FIRE AND

MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE

COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation with its

principal place of business in Minnesota,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAULDIN-DORFMEIER CONSTRUCTION

COMPANY, INC., a California corporation with

its principal place of business in California;

PATRICK K. MAULDIN, a California citizen,

individually and as trustee of THE PATRICK

AND VALERIE MAULDIN LIVING TRUST;

VALERIE MAULDIN, a California citizen,

individually and as trustee of THE PATRICK

AND VALERIE MAULDIN LIVING TRUST;

ALAN F. DORFMEIER, a California citizen,

individually and as trustee of THE 1993

DORFMEIER FAMILY TRUST; MARY

EILEEN DORFMEIER, a California citizen,

individually and as trustee of THE 1993

DORFMEIER FAMILY TRUST,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:05-cv-00063-AWI-LJO

THIRD STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING TIME

TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIM

[No Hearing Required]

and related counterclaim

)

)

)

Case 1:05-cv-00063-AWI-LJO Document 137 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 3
Having considered the agreement to the terms of this order by plaintiff and

counterdefendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company ("Plaintiff") and

defendants and counterclaimants Mauldin-Dorfmeier Construction Company, Inc., Alan

F. Dorfmeier and Patrick K. Mauldin ("Defendants"), through counsel, as is evidenced by

the signatures of counsel below, having been informed that Plaintiff and Defendants

stipulated in the "Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Counterclaim," filed August

15, 2005, to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to the "Counterclaim for Breach of

Contract; Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Negligence;

Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage; Negligent Interference

with Prospective Economic Advantage; Volunteerism; Breach of Contract re: General

Indemnity Agreement, For Declaratory Relief and for Objection to Claims" (the

"Counterclaim"), filed July 29, 2005, from August 22, 2005 to and including Augusts 26,

2005, having considered that this Court, pursuant to its "Stipulated Order Extending

Time to Respond to Counterclaim," filed August 31, 2005, extended the time for Plaintiff

to respond to the Counterclaim from August 26, 2005 to September 8, 2005, having

considered that this Court, pursuant to its "Second Stipulated Order Extending Time to

Respond to Counterclaim," filed September 7, 2005, extended the time for Plaintiff to

respond to the Counterclaim from September 8, 2005 to September 21, 2005, and that the

parties are in serious settlement discussions which continue to progress and that the

parties desire not to incur potentially unnecessary attorneys fees and expenses during

those discussions, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby

Case 1:05-cv-00063-AWI-LJO Document 137 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 3
ORDERED, pursuant to Local Rule 6-144, that the time for Plaintiff to respond to

the Counterclaim is extended from September 21, 2005 to and including October 14,

2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 16, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00063-AWI-LJO Document 137 Filed 09/19/05 Page 3 of 3