Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03046/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03046-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE. RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND HEARING DATE 

USDC 4:16-cv-03046-KAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ZACH COWAN, City Attorney, SBN 96372 

SAVITH IYENGAR, Deputy City Attorney, SBN 96372 

siyengar@ci.berkeley.ca.us

BERKELEY CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

2180 Milvia Street, Fourth Floor 

Berkeley, CA 94704 

TEL.: (510) 981-6998 

FAX.: (510) 981-6960 

Attorneys for Defendant City of Berkeley 

DAVID W. TROTTER, SBN 97121

david.trotter@dtrotterlaw.com

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID W. TROTTER 

119 Allen Court 

Moraga, CA 94556 

Telephone: (925) 876-1503 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs OPHCA, LLC, 

Clifford Orloff and Olga Orloff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

OPHCA, LLC, a California limited liability 

company; CLIFFORD ORLOFF, an 

individual; and OLGA ORLOFF, an 

individual, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY OF BERKELEY, 

 Defendant. 

NO. 4:16-cv-03046-KAW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT AND REGARDING 

HEARING DATE 

 

RECITALS 

1. On June 6, 2016, plaintiffs OPHCA, LLC, Clifford Orloff and Olga Orloff 

(“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against defendant City of Berkeley (“City”). 

2. Given the unavailability of counsel for the City and counsel for Plaintiffs in June 

and August, respectively, the parties have agreed to the instant stipulation. 

3. The first part of this stipulation extends the City’s time to answer or otherwise 

respond to the complaint, and will not alter the dates fixed thus far by the Court’s Order Setting 

Case 3:16-cv-03046-CRB Document 14 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 3
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE. RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND HEARING DATE 

USDC 4:16-cv-03046-KAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, dated June 7, 2016. Accordingly, this 

part of the stipulation may be made without a Court order under Northern District Rule 6-1(a). 

4. The second part of this stipulation requires a Court order under Northern District 

Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2. The parties respectfully request that, if the City files a Rule 12(b) motion 

in response to Plaintiffs’ complaint, the Court allow the City to select a hearing date no earlier 

than August 29, 2016. 

5. The third part of this stipulation is made under Northern District Rule 6-1(a) and 

simply memorializes the parties’ agreement that, if the City seeks to file a motion that would 

create a deadline for Plaintiffs to respond between July 31, 2016 and August 29, 2016, the parties 

will meet and confer at that time regarding obtaining a further stipulation and proposed order to 

change time. 

6. There have been no previous time modifications in this case. 

7. Pursuant to this Court’s standing order, this stipulation will be submitted by email 

to kawpo@cand.uscourts.gov as a word processing attachment on the same day the document is 

e-filed. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:16-cv-03046-CRB Document 14 Filed 06/16/16 Page 2 of 3
3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE. RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND HEARING DATE 

USDC 4:16-cv-03046-KAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION 

The parties stipulate as follows: 

1. The City shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint by July 15, 2016. 

2. If the City files a Rule 12(b) motion in response to Plaintiffs’ complaint, the motion 

will be heard no earlier than August 29, 2016. 

3. If the City seeks to file a motion that would create a deadline for Plaintiffs to respond 

between July 31, 2016 and August 29, 2016, the parties will meet and confer at that 

time regarding obtaining a further stipulation and proposed order to change time. 

Dated: June 15, 2016 By: s/ Savith Iyengar 

 Savith Iyengar, Deputy City Attorney 

Attorney for Defendant City of Berkeley 

Dated: June 15, 2016 By: **s/ David W. Trotter 

 David W. Trotter 

Attorney for Plaintiffs OPHCA, LLC, 

Clifford Orloff and Olga Orloff 

** Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the electronic 

signatory has obtained approval from this 

signatory. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________________

 

 

KANDIS A. WESTMORE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

6/16/16

Case 3:16-cv-03046-CRB Document 14 Filed 06/16/16 Page 3 of 3