Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_94-cv-01665/USCOURTS-caed-2_94-cv-01665-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

633-1, Stip and [Proposed] order, 2-14-07 

ESPINOZA V. AYERS, Case No. S94-1665 (LKK/DAD) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER MODIFYING ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROSEN, BIEN & ASARO, LLP 

ANDREA G. ASARO Bar No.: 107039 

115 Montgomery Street, 8th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone (415) 433-6830 

GAIL R. WEINHEIMER Bar No.: 58589 

862 Sir Francis Drake Blvd., No. 245 

San Anselmo, California 94960-1914 

Telephone (415) 256-1341 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

Antonio Espinoza 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Antonio Espinoza, 

 Petitioner, 

vs. 

Arthur Calderon, 

 Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. S-94-1665 (LKK/DAD) 

DEATH PENALTY CASE

STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER 

MODIFYING ORDER FOLLOWING 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

TO: THE HONORABLE DALE A. DROZD, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR 

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: 

 The parties, through counsel, have met and conferred regarding the current briefing 

schedule for Petitioner’s Renewed Motion For Evidentiary Hearing. Due to scheduling 

constraints, including Petitioner’s counsel’s pre-paid vacation and deadlines in other state and 

federal court cases, the parties hereby stipulate that the Court’s Order entered June 26, 2006, 

following the June 16, 2006 Case Management Conference, be further modified, as follows: 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:94-cv-01665-KJM-SCR Document 233 Filed 02/15/07 Page 1 of 2
2

ESPINOZA V. AYERS, Case No. S94-1665 (LKK/DAD) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER MODIFYING ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Petitioner’s Reply Brief, currently due February 23, 2007, shall be due March 2, 2007; the 

hearing on Petitioner’s motion shall remain set for March 12, 2007, at 11:00 a.m. 

Date: February 14, 2007 Date: February 14, 2007 

/s/ Andrea G. Asaro /s/ Sean McCoy 

Andrea G. Asaro Sean McCoy 

Attorneys for Petitioner Attorneys for Respondent 

ORDER 

 Good cause appearing, and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ordered that 

Petitioner shall have to and including March 2, 2007 to file his Reply Brief in support of his 

Renewed Motion For Evidentiary Hearing, and that said motion shall remain set for March 12, 

2007, at 11:00 a.m. 

DATED: February 15, 2007. 

Ddad1/orders.capital/espinoza1665.stipord 

Case 2:94-cv-01665-KJM-SCR Document 233 Filed 02/15/07 Page 2 of 2