Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-07194/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-07194-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE, 

P.C,

Plaintiff,

v.

LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-07194-MMC 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 

REQUESTING DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. No. 146

Before the Court is plaintiff LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.’s Administrative 

Motion, filed September 17, 2018, “to Request that the Court Dismiss Case in View of 

Appeal.” Defendant LegalZoom.com, Inc. has filed opposition.

Having read and considered the parties’ respective submissions, the Court, for the 

reasons stated by defendant (see Def.’s Opp. at 1:9-26), finds the relief sought by plaintiff 

is not properly sought in a motion for administrative relief. See Civil L.R. 7-11 (providing 

party may file motion for administrative relief with respect to “administrative matters, not 

otherwise governed by a federal statute, Federal or local rule or standing order”).

Accordingly, plaintiff’s Administrative Motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 24, 2018

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-07194-MMC Document 149 Filed 09/24/18 Page 1 of 1