Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01337/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01337-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOWARD MAURICE HUDSON, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1337 FCD EFB P

vs.

TIMOTHY L. FRAWLEY, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On November 11, 2007, the court ordered plaintiff to file a new and complete in forma

pauperis affidavit which included the required trust account statement and completed certificate

portion of the application. That order warned plaintiff that his failure to timely do so would

result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. On April 8, 2008, the court granted

plaintiff an extension of 20 days in which to comply with the November 11, 2007, order.

The 20-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed a completed in forma pauperis

affidavit or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

It therefore is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

Case 2:07-cv-01337-FCD-EFB Document 10 Filed 07/22/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: July 22, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-01337-FCD-EFB Document 10 Filed 07/22/08 Page 2 of 2