Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00414/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00414-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jack Scott, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. et al,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-414-PHX-FJM

ORDER

The court has before it plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

(doc. 11). Plaintiff asks that we, without notice to the defendants, restrain defendants from

enforcing their state court forcible detainer judgment. But there are no allegations that would

justify granting such relief without notice. See Rule 65(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. Nor does it

appear that there is any probability of success on the merits of the request for a restraining

order. Judge Bolton denied a stay in Scott v. Bank of New York, CV 9-2056, and the United

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a stay on February 25, 2011. This

action appears to be an effort to relitigate matters already decided. 

Therefore, it is ORDERED DENYING plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Temporary

Restraining Order. (Doc. 11). This, of course, is without prejudice to whatever rights

Case 2:11-cv-00414-FJM Document 16 Filed 03/21/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

plaintiff may have to seek further judicial review of the state court judgment in the state court

system. 

DATED this 18th day of March, 2011.

Case 2:11-cv-00414-FJM Document 16 Filed 03/21/11 Page 2 of 2