Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-06272/USCOURTS-cand-4_17-cv-06272-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INTELLISOFT, LTD,

Plaintiff,

v.

ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-06272-PJH 

ORDER RE OBJECTION TO REPLY 

EVIDENCE

Re: Dkt. No. 29

The court is in receipt of defendants’ objection to reply evidence. Defendants may 

file a sur-reply of no longer than five pages by Friday, December 29, 2017. The sur-reply 

may only address new evidence or argument plaintiff raised for the first time in its reply. 

Other than defendants’ sur-reply, the court does not intend to allow any further 

briefing on the present motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 22, 2017

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:17-cv-06272-PJH Document 30 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 1