Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00102/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00102-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

PLAINTIFF’S FINAL WITNESS LIST 

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HECTOR E. SALITRERO (SBN 81186) 

LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ. 

1530 The Alameda, Suite 301 

San Jose, CA 95126 

Phone: (408) 971-3903 

Fax: (408) 971-0117 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION 

JUAN R. SANDOVAL, 

 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF PARLIER, and Parlier City Police OFFICER 

R. JIMENEZ, in his official capacity 

Defendants. 

 

) 

) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

CASE # 1:07-CV-00102-OWW-SMS 

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTIONS IN LIMINE 

Date: June 24, 2008 

Time: 1:00 a.m. 

Ct.Rm,: 3 

The hearing on the Motions in Limine filed by Plaintiff Juan R. 

Sandoval, came on regularly on June 20, 2008, in Court Room 3of the abovereferenced Court, the Honorable Oliver W. Wanger presiding. Plaintiff appeared 

personally, and his counsel, Hector E. Salitrero, of the Law Offices of Fernando F. 

Chavez, appeared telephonically. Defendant appeared through his counsel James 

D. Emerson and C. Fredrick Meine, of Emerson, Corey & Sorensen. The Court 

having read and considered the Motions and Oppositions thereto, and having heard 

oral argument, ruled as follows: 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00102-OWW -SMS Document 34 Filed 06/24/08 Page 1 of 2
 

PLAINTIFF’S FINAL WITNESS LIST 

-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff’s Motions Nos. 1-3 are granted as requested. 

Plaintiff’s Motions Nos. 4 and 5 are granted, with leave for Defense 

counsel to renew motion and make showing of admissibility. The Court finds that 

as to Motion 5, Defense counsel will have to make a substantial showing of 

relevance and lack of prejudice given that the events alleged are extremely remote 

in time. 

IT IS SO ORDERED, 

DATED: June 24, 2008 By: /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER 

 Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 

 U.S. District Judge 

 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00102-OWW -SMS Document 34 Filed 06/24/08 Page 2 of 2