Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00730/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00730-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY GUTIERREZ,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-0730 FCD KJM P

vs.

WARDEN, CSP SOLANO,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed May 10, 2006, petitioner’s amended application for writ of habeas

corpus was dismissed and thirty days’ leave to file a second amended application was granted. 

The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an amended application or

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:05-cv-00730-FCD-KJM Document 11 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 18, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/mp

guti0730.ftahab

Case 2:05-cv-00730-FCD-KJM Document 11 Filed 07/19/06 Page 2 of 2