Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05641/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05641-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OMAR KAHLIFE KING, CASE NO. CV-F-04-5641 AWI DLB HC

Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE 

vs. IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH COURT ORDER

SCOTT KERNAN, Warden, 

Respondent. [Doc. 14]

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On June 10, 2005, the Court directed Respondent to file a response to the second amended

petition within sixty days from the date of service of that order. Over sixty days have passed and now

response has been filed by Respondent. 

Local Rule 11-110 provides that “a failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Local

Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all

sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.@ 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty (20) days of service of this order, 

///

///

///

Case 1:04-cv-05641-AWI-DLB Document 17 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Respondent shall SHOW CAUSE why appropriate sanctions should not be imposed for failing to obey

a court order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 15, 2005 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05641-AWI-DLB Document 17 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2