Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04909/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04909-50/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

01731.51443/3570458.1 Case Nos. 08-cv-4909-SI (BZ), 09-cv-4919-SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SANOFI’S MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND, 

GMBH, 

Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant,

vs.

GENENTECH, INC. and BIOGEN IDEC 

INC.,

Defendants and 

Counterclaimants. 

CASE NOS. 08-cv-4909-SI (BZ), 

 09-cv-4919-SI 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SANOFI’S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION 

FOR RECONSIDERATION OF CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION ORDER 

Honorable Susan Illston 

Case 3:08-cv-04909-SI Document 392 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

01731.51443/3570458.1 -2- Case Nos. 08-cv-4909-SI (BZ), 09-cv-4919-SI

[[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SANOFI’S MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered Plaintiff Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmBH’s Motion for Leave to 

File Motion for Reconsideration of Claim Construction Order, all declarations cited therein, and 

all pleadings and other papers in support thereof, and Defendants Genentech, Inc. and Biogen Idec 

Inc.’s Opposition thereto, and all pleadings and other papers in support thereof, the Court 

concludes that good cause does not exist for Sanofi’s Motion. The Court therefore ORDERS that 

Sanofi’s motion is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July __, 2010 __________________________________________ 

 The Honorable Susan Illston 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-04909-SI Document 392 Filed 07/13/10 Page 2 of 2