Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02231/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02231-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2231

TERRI L. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Department of Health and 

Human Services; ANN TAUBENHEIM, Supervisory Public Health 

Advisor, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, 

Lung and Blood Institutes, Department of Health and Human 

Services; TIMOTHY WHEELES, Acting Executive Officer, 

National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and 

Human Services; SALLY MCDONOUGH, Director of 

Communications, National Institutes of Health, National 

Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes, Department of Health and 

Human Services,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. 

(8:13-cv-02527-RWT)

Submitted: April 15, 2015 Decided: April 28, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 14-2231 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/28/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Terri L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2231 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/28/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Terri Williams appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on her complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012), Title VII 

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17

(2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 

U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Williams v. Burwell, 

8:13-cv-02527-RWT, 2014 WL 5797777 (D. Md. Nov. 5, 2014). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-2231 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/28/2015 Pg: 3 of 3