Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01219/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01219-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. (SBN 69888)

BEN NISENBAUM, Esq. (SBN 222173)

BRANDON YEE, Esq. (SBN 344583)

BURRIS NISENBAUM CURRY AND LACY, LLP

Airport Corporate Centre

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120

Oakland, California 94621

Telephone: (510) 839-5200

Facsimile: (844) 273-6873

john.burris@bncllaw.com

ben.nisenbaum@bncllaw.com

brandon.yee@bncllaw.com

K. CHIKE ODIWE, Esq. (SBN 315109)

LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH CHIKE ODIWE, PC

2880 Zanker Road Suite 203, PMB 1689 

San Jose, CA 95134 

Telephone: (669) 315-4431

Facsimile: (669) 315-4431

kenneth@kennethodiwelaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DARRYL JACKSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRYL JACKSON, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

v.

ANTHONY PERRY, individually and in his 

official capacity as an officer for the Stockton 

Police Department; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 

individually, jointly, and severally,

 Defendants.

CASE NO.: 2:24-cv-01219-JDP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE 

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Case 2:24-cv-01219-JDP Document 33 Filed 01/08/25 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Plaintiff DARRYL JACKSON and defendant ANTHONY PERRY, acting by and through 

their attorneys of record, herein stipulate for an Order of Dismissal of the Entire Action with 

prejudice, each side to bear their own fees and costs. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 

 Burris Nisenbaum Curry and Lacy, LLP

January 7, 2025 __/s/Brandon Yee________

 Brandon Yee

Attorney for Plaintiff 

 Porter Scott

January 7, 2025 __/s/ William Camy______

 William Camy

Attorney for Defendant 

 

Case 2:24-cv-01219-JDP Document 33 Filed 01/08/25 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, the entire action is 

hereby dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear their own fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2025 

JEREMY D. PETERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-01219-JDP Document 33 Filed 01/08/25 Page 3 of 3