Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05444/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05444-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

SFUH/1041644/1158338v.1

MATTHEW RAFAT (Bar No. 221577) 

Attorney at Law 

28 North First Street, Suite 305 

San Jose, CA 95113 

408-871-2899 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 SAN JOSE BRANCH 

JAMILAH ABDUL HAQQ, an individual, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

STANFORD HOSPITAL AND CLINICS, 

LUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN’S 

HOSPITAL, 

Defendants. 

CASE No.: C06-05444 JW [RS] 

STIPULATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING 

TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case 5:06-cv-05444-JW Document 22 Filed 02/27/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pursuant to Local Rules 6.1 and 6.2, we, the undersigned, on behalf of Defendant and 

Plaintiff, respectively, hereby stipulate to shorten time to hear the motion filed by Plaintiff AbdulHaqq on February 21, 2007. Whereas, 

(1) The Early Neutral Evaluation in this case is March 26; and 

(2) Defendants contend they need the documents at issue in plaintiff’s motion before the 

Early Neutral Evaluation in order to properly assess and evaluate the case; and 

(3) Plaintiff contends that the subpoenas are overbroad, request consumer records, and 

invade her privacy; and 

(4) Defendants contend that the documents at issue are critical to their discovery plans and 

critical to several depositions Defendants intend to take in the next few weeks; and 

(5) Plaintiff has already stipulated to an extension of two deposition dates, which Defendants 

re-scheduled; and 

(6) The subpoenas request records by March 14, 2007; 

(7) The requested time modification would have no effect on the schedule for the case,

It is hereby stipulated that the hearing on the motion should be at the court’s convenience, 

but before March 9, 2007, with opposing papers to be filed by March 2, 2007, and a reply brief by 

March 5, 2007. Plaintiff is available at any time except for March 5, 8, 13-15, 20, and 26, 2007. 

Defendant is available anytime in March except for the following dates: March 5, 8, 9, 12-14, 16, 21, 

23, 26, and 27, 2007. If a hearing is to be held after March 9, 2007, plaintiff requests that all 

subpoenas be stayed until the Court renders a decision. 

Dated: 2/26/2007 Dated: 2/26/2007 

/sd/ Marcie Isom (see chambers copy) /sd/ Matthew Rafat (see chambers copy)

Marcie Isom, Defendants’ Counsel Matthew Rafat, Plaintiff’s Counsel 

___________________________________________________2

Stipulation and Order 

SFUH/1041644/1158338v.1

Case 5:06-cv-05444-JW Document 22 Filed 02/27/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS ORDERED THAT the hearing on PLAINTIFF’s Motion for a Qualified Protective 

Order will be heard at TIME _____________________ on DATE ___________________ in 

Courtroom 8, with an opposition to be filed by March __, 2007 and a reply brief by March ___, 

2007. All subpoenas in Case C06-05444 are stayed pending order of the Court. 

Dated: __________________________ 

________________________________ 

HONORABLE JUDGE JAMES WARE 

___________________________________________________3

Stipulation and Order 

SFUH/1041644/1158338v.1

9:30 AM March 19 X

#4 2 5

Magistrate Judge Seeborg will be presiding over the Motion Hearing for a Qualified Protective Order. 2/27/2007

Case 5:06-cv-05444-JW Document 22 Filed 02/27/07 Page 3 of 3