Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00805/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00805-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1319 Clean Water Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

MICHAEL R. LOZEAU (Cal. Bar No. 142893) 

Law Office of Michael R. Lozeau 

1516 Oak Street, Suite 216 

Alameda, CA 94501 

Tel: (510) 749-9102 

Fax: (510) 749-9103 

E-mail: mrlozeau@lozeaulaw.com

ANDREW L. PACKARD (Cal. Bar No. 168690) 

MICHAEL P. LYNES (Cal. Bar No. 230462) 

Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard 

319 Pleasant Street 

Petaluma, CA 94952 

Tel: (707) 763-7227 

Fax: (707) 763-9229 

E-mail: andrew@packardlawoffices.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA 

SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING 

PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non profit 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AUBURN PLACER DISPOSAL SERVICE, 

INC., a corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:06-cv-00805-LKK-KJM 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS WITH 

PREJUDICE; ORDER GRANTING 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 

41(a)(2)] 

 

WHEREAS, on January 17, 2006, Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance 

(“CSPA”) provided Defendant Auburn Placer Disposal Service, Inc. (“APDS”) with a Notice of 

Violations and Intent to File Suit (“Notice”) under Clean Water Act §505, 33 U.S.C. §1365. 

WHEREAS, on April 13, 2006 CSPA filed its Complaint against APDS in this Court, 

California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Auburn Placer Disposal Service, Inc., Case No. 

2:06-cv-00805-LKK-KJM. Said Complaint incorporates by reference all of the allegations 

contained in CSPA’s Notice. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00805-LKK -KJM Document 18 Filed 11/15/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

2 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

WHEREAS, CSPA and APDS, through their authorized representatives and without either 

adjudication of CSPA’s claims or admission by APDS of any alleged violation or other 

wrongdoing, have chosen to resolve in full by way of settlement the allegations of CSPA as set 

forth in the Notice and Complaint, thereby avoiding the costs and uncertainties of further 

litigation. A copy of the (Proposed) Consent Agreement (“Consent Agreement”) entered into by 

and between CSPA and APDS is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference. 

WHEREAS, the parties submitted the Consent Agreement via certified mail, return receipt 

requested, to the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice and the 45-day review period set 

forth at 40 C.F.R. § 135.5 has passed. 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the 

parties that CSPA’s claims, as set forth in the Notice and Complaint, be dismissed with prejudice 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The parties respectfully request an Order 

from this Court dismissing such claims with prejudice. In accordance with paragraph 20 of the 

Consent Agreement, the parties also request that this Court retain and have jurisdiction over the 

Parties with respect to disputes arising under the Consent Agreement. 

Dated: November 9, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD 

By: /s/ Andrew L. Packard 

Andrew L. Packard 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: November 9, 2006 BARG COFFIN LEWIS & TRAPP, LLP 

By: /s/ Brian Haughton 

Brian Haughton 

Attorney for Defendant 

[electronic signature authorized by counsel] 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00805-LKK -KJM Document 18 Filed 11/15/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Good cause appearing, and the parties having stipulated and agreed, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance’s 

claims against Defendant APDS, Inc., as set forth in the Notice and Complaint filed in Case No. 

2:06-cv-00805-LKK-KJM, are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain and have jurisdiction over the 

Parties with respect to disputes arising under the agreement attached as Exhibit A to the parties’ 

Stipulation to Dismiss. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATED: November 15, 2006. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00805-LKK -KJM Document 18 Filed 11/15/06 Page 3 of 3