Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05676/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05676-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; PROPOSED ORDER - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT J. SAGARIA (SBN 217981) 

ELLIOT W. GALE (SBN 263326) 

JOE ANGELO (SBN 268542) 

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 6th

San Jose, CA 95110 

 Floor 

408-279-2288 ph: 408-279-2299 fax 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DAVINA CRUZ,

Plaintiff,

v. 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC.; et. al., 

 

 Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-CV-05676-WHA

STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; PROPOSED 

ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Davina Cruz and defendant 

Bank of America, N.A., that Bank of America, N.A. be dismissed from this action with prejudice 

pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, section 41(a)(2), and that each party shall bear its 

own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

//

//

Case 3:16-cv-05676-WHA Document 73 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; PROPOSED ORDER - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: January 5, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C.

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Davina Cruz 

DATED: January 5, 2017 McGuire Woods LLP

By: /s/ Anthony Le

 Anthony Le 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Bank of America, N.A. 

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Anthony Le has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Defendant Bank of America, N.A. is dismissed 

with prejudice as to plaintiff's claims only (i.e., without prejudice to any potential cross-claims

that might possibly be asserted later by co-defendants against Bank of America).

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 

 WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

January 18, 2017.

Case 3:16-cv-05676-WHA Document 73 Filed 01/18/17 Page 2 of 2