Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05547/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05547-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05547 (EMC) 

GARY D. FRIEDMAN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

gary.friedman@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153

Telephone: (212) 310-8000 

Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 

CHRISTOPHER J. COX (Bar No. 151650) 

chris.cox@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP 

201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Telephone: (650) 802-3029 

Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 

Attorneys for Defendant 

TUESDAY MORNING, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CYNTHIA MCMAHON, on behalf of 

herself, all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TUESDAY MORNING, INC., a Texas 

corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05547 (EMC)

(Removed from Contra Costa Superior Court 

Case No. C-14-02113) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO LOCAL 

RULE 6-2 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

Case 3:14-cv-05547-EMC Document 68 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05547 (EMC)

Defendant Tuesday Morning, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Cynthia McMahon 

(“Plaintiff”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, 

hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2016 Plaintiff filed her Notice of Motion and Motion for 

Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (ECF No. 63) (“Motion”), which Motion 

Plaintiff noticed to be heard before this Court on February 2, 2017 in accordance with this 

Court’s rules and Scheduling Notes; 

WHEREAS, on December 7, 2016, this Court issued an Order re Supplemental Briefing 

(ECF No. 66) (“Order”), requesting that the Parties address a number of issues in respect of 

Plaintiff’s Motion, and that the Parties submit one joint supplemental brief addressing the issues 

raised by the Court; 

WHEREAS, the Order directed the Parties to submit their joint supplemental brief by 

December 14, 2016, which is one week from the date of the Order; 

WHEREAS, due to 1) previously scheduled work conflicts during the next week—

including Plaintiff’s counsel’s out of town court hearings on December 9, 2016 and December 

12, 2016 and Defendant’s counsel’s multiple witness deposition preparations in another matter, 

2) the previously scheduled vacation of the associate from Defendant’s firm who has been 

working on this matter since the outset, 3) the need for the Parties to meet and confer over many 

of the issues in the Order, and 4) the need for counsel for the Parties to confer with their 

respective clients on the subjects raised in the Order, the Parties jointly request to extend their 

deadline to file the supplemental brief by one week, to and including December 21, 2016; 

WHEREAS, the Parties are not seeking to modify the February 2, 2017 date for which 

Plaintiff noticed her Motion to be heard; 

WHEREAS, in sum, the Parties have agreed to the following revised briefing schedule: 

• Due date for the Parties’ joint supplemental brief shall be December 21, 2016 

 WHEREAS, the Parties have not previously requested an extension of this deadline; 

Case 3:14-cv-05547-EMC Document 68 Filed 12/09/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

 2 CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05547 (EMC)

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, 

through their respective counsel and subject to the Court’s approval, that the Parties’ deadline to 

file their joint supplemental brief pursuant to the Order shall be December 21, 2016. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: December 8, 2016 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

By: /s/ Gary D. Friedman 

Gary D. Friedman (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Attorneys for Defendant 

TUESDAY MORNING, INC. 

DATED: December 8, 2016 SETAREH LAW GROUP 

By: /s/ Shaun Setareh 

Shaun Setareh 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CYNTHIA MCMAHON 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 

 

Case 3:14-cv-05547-EMC Document 68 Filed 12/09/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

 3 CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05547 (EMC)

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: By: 

The Honorable Edward M. Chen

United States District Judge

12/9/2016

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-05547-EMC Document 68 Filed 12/09/16 Page 4 of 4