Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01247/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01247-47/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:206 Collect Unpaid Wages

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MODIFICATION OF 

SCHEDULING ORDER - 1

No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800

Seattle, Washington 98101-2272

(206) 749-0500

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

David N. Bruce, Pro Hac Vice

James P. Savitt, Pro Hac Vice

Miles A. Yanick, Pro Hac Vice

Sarah Gohmann Bigelow, Pro Hac Vice

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

1425 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800

Seattle, Washington 98101

Telephone: (206) 749-0500

William C. Hahesy, State Bar No. 105743

LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY

225 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 105

Fresno, CA 93704

Telephone: (559) 579-1230

Facsimile: (559) 579-1231

Attorneys for Defendant DELANO FARMS COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AT FRESNO

SABAS ARREDONDO, JOSE CUEVAS, 

HILARIO GOMEZ, IRMA LANDEROS, and 

ROSALBA LANDEROS individually, and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DELANO FARMS COMPANY, a Washington 

State Corporation; CAL-PACIFIC FARM 

MANAGEMENT, L.P.; T&R BANGI'S 

AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, INC., and 

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

NO. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING MODIFICATION OF 

SCHEDULING ORDER

On February 3, 2016, a Telephonic Discovery Dispute Conference was held to address 

issues relating to the timing of Plaintiffs’ service of written objections to Delano Farms 

Company’s Fourth Set of Interrogatories and Fifth Set of Requests for Production (the 

“Discovery”). (Doc. 409.) The Parties were directed to meet and confer further to reach an 

Case 1:09-cv-01247-MJS Document 412 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MODIFICATION OF 

SCHEDULING ORDER - 2

No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800

Seattle, Washington 98101-2272

(206) 749-0500

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

agreement for the extension of the deadlines in the Amended Scheduling Order to 

accommodate Plaintiffs’ request for additional time to serve their objections. (Id.) 

Having met and conferred, the Parties hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiffs’ Survey Completion Deadline, Expert Disclosure Deadline, and Trial 

Plan Filing Deadline shall remain unchanged as set forth in the Amended Scheduling Order. 

(Doc. 407.)

2. Plaintiffs’ deadline to serve supplemental responses and objections, if any, to the 

Discovery is February 29, 2016. Plaintiffs will use a service method that ensures Defendants’ 

receipt of all materials on February 29, 2016. To the extent the requested information or 

documents have already been produced in Plaintiffs’ expert disclosures or are being withheld 

based on objections, Plaintiffs’ responses will so state. 

3. The Parties will meet and confer on Plaintiffs’ objections and responses to the 

Discovery on March 1, 2016. 

4. Delano Farms will file its motion regarding Plaintiffs’ objections and responses 

to the Discovery, if necessary, by March 7, 2016. Delano Farms is further excused from 

following the Court’s procedures for a Telephonic Discovery Dispute Conference in advance of 

filing its motion. The Parties agree to waive the provisions of Local Rule 251, including the 

time limits for hearing on the motion and the preparation of a joint statement regarding

discovery disagreement. The Parties agree that the moving papers may include a notice of 

motion, memorandum of points and authorities, and declarations. The Discovery requests, 

objections and written responses at issue will be reproduced in full, in Delano Farms’ moving 

papers. Opposing papers may include a memorandum of points and authorities and 

declarations. The Parties further agree that the Court may rule by minute order outlining the 

rationale for the ruling without a detailed recitation of authority. 

5. Any opposition to Delano Farms’ Discovery motion must be filed by March 14, 

2016.

6. Any reply in support of Delano Farms’ Discovery motion must be filed by 

Case 1:09-cv-01247-MJS Document 412 Filed 02/05/16 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MODIFICATION OF 

SCHEDULING ORDER - 3

No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800

Seattle, Washington 98101-2272

(206) 749-0500

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

March 17, 2016.

7. Delano Farms’ Discovery motion will be noted for a hearing date of March 18, 

2016. The motion will be heard without oral argument unless requested by the Court. 

8. Defendants’ deadline for making expert disclosures and filing their response to

Plaintiffs’ trial plan is May 16, 2016. If Defendants chose to make a counter-proposal, it shall 

be as part of the response.

9. Plaintiffs’ deadline for filing a reply in support of their proposed trial plan is 

June 6, 2016.

10. A hearing on the trial plan shall be held on June 30, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., Fresno 

Courtroom 6 (MJS).

11. The Trial Scheduling Conference will remain unchanged as set forth in the 

Amended Scheduling Order. (Doc. 407.)

SO STIPULATED:

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

By /s/ David N. Bruce (as authorized on 

02/05/2016)

 David N. Bruce, Pro Hac Vice

 Miles A. Yanick, Pro Hac Vice

Attorneys for Delano Farms Company

MCCORMICK BARSTOW LLP

By /s/ D. Greg Durbin (as authorized on 

02/05/2016)

 D. Greg Durbin, State Bar No. 81749

 Laura A. Wolfe, State Bar No. 266751

Attorneys for Cal-Pacific Farm Management, 

L.P., and T&R Bangi’s Agricultural Services, Inc. 

LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY

By /s/ William C. Hahesy (as authorized 

on 02/05/2016)

 William C. Hahesy, State Bar No. 105743

Attorney for Delano Farms Company

MARTINEZ AGUILASOCHO & LYNCH

By /s/ Thomas Patrick Lynch (as authorized 

on 02/05/2016)

 Mario Martinez, State Bar No. 200721

 Thomas Patrick Lynch, State Bar No.159277

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 1:09-cv-01247-MJS Document 412 Filed 02/05/16 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MODIFICATION OF 

SCHEDULING ORDER - 4

No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800

Seattle, Washington 98101-2272

(206) 749-0500

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the Court accepts and adopts the terms of the 

STIPULATION REGARDING MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER in Case 

NO.1:09-cv-01247-MJS and modifies the Scheduling Order in the way and to the 

extent provided in the said Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 5, 2016 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-01247-MJS Document 412 Filed 02/05/16 Page 4 of 4