Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00476/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00476-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON DAVID YONAI,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0476 FCD DAD P

vs.

S.V.S.P. EMPLOYEES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 11, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported in part by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. The record reflects that

plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with court orders, specifically the failure to submit a

properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, would result in dismissal of this

Case 2:06-cv-00476-FCD-DAD Document 13 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

action. However, the record does not reflect that plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with

court orders would result in a dismissal of this action with prejudice. As such, the court does not

adopt the magistrate judge’s recommendation that the action be dismissed with prejudice. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 11, 2006, are adopted in

part; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with court

orders.

DATED:August 15, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00476-FCD-DAD Document 13 Filed 08/16/06 Page 2 of 2