Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03359/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03359-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Marvin P. Fresquez, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIV 05-3359 PHX DGC (VAM)

)

Joseph Arpaio, et al., ) O R D E R

)

 Defendants. )

Plaintiff filed a pro se Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 21, 2005. (Doc. 1). On January 12,

2006, defendant Arpaio filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 7). On

January 20, 2006, Magistrate Judge Mathis issued an Order advising

plaintiff of the filing of the Motion to Dismiss and giving him

until February 10, 2006 to file his response. (Doc. 8). This

Order also advised plaintiff of his obligation to timely respond

to all motions and that failure to respond could result in the

granting of that Motion. Plaintiff did not file a response. It

is assumed that plaintiff received all the Court Orders issued to

this point as no mail had been returned as undeliverable. The

docket also reflects that plaintiff filed a notice of change of

address on November 15, 2005 (Doc. 5) which indicates he was aware

of the requirement to keep the Court advised of his address. 

Since plaintiff did not file a response to the Motion to

Dismiss, Magistrate Judge Mathis issued an Order giving him an

Case 2:05-cv-03359-DGC-VAM Document 11 Filed 04/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

additional opportunity to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. (Doc.

9). This Order was returned as undeliverable with the notation

that plaintiff was no longer in custody. Having failed to file a

response to the Motion to Dismiss and to notify the Court of a new

address, it appears that plaintiff has abandoned his claims.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED granting defendants' Motion to

Dismiss. (Doc. 7). This action is dismissed without prejudice

and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 28th day of April, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03359-DGC-VAM Document 11 Filed 04/28/06 Page 2 of 2