Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05083/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05083-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NO. 3:14-CV-05083-WHA JOINT STIPULATION 

RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

ROD M. FLIEGEL, Bar No. 168289

rfliegel@littler.com

AURELIO J. PÉREZ, Bar No. 282135

aperez@littler.com

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street, 20th Floor

San Francisco, California 94108.2693

Telephone: 415.433.1940

Facsimile: 415.399.8490

Attorneys for Defendant 

RECOLOGY SAN FRANCISCO

STANLEY GOFF, Bar No. 289564

scraiggoff@aol.com

LAW OFFICES OF STANLEY GOFF

15 Boardman Place Suite 2

San Francisco, California 94103

Telephone: 415.571.9570

Facsimile: 415.864.3389

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DARYLE WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DARYLE WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

RECOLOGY SAN FRANCISCO and 

DOES 1 through 50,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:14-cv-05083-WHA

JOINT STIPULATION MEMORIALIZING 

AGREEMENT REGARDING 

DEFENDANT’S DISCOVERY DISPUTE 

PURSUANT TO COURT’S ORDER 

FOLLOWING DISCOVERY HEARING

Order re Order re

Case 3:14-cv-05083-WHA Document 36 Filed 07/09/15 Page 1 of 5
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NO. 3:14-CV-05083-WHA 1. JOINT STIPULATION

RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Pursuant to the Court’s Ordered Hearing on Defendant’s Discovery Dispute [Dkt

#32], the Parties met and conferred in the Judge’s Jury Room on July 7, 2015. The Parties reached a 

resolution of their discovery dispute. The Parties memorialized this resolution in an agreement they 

drafted, reviewed, revised, and signed in the Judge’s Jury Room at approximately 1 p.m. that same 

afternoon. Later that same afternoon, Plaintiff alerted Defendant via electronic mail that Plaintiff no 

longer agreed to the negotiated stipulation as, upon further reflection, Plaintiff did not believe it 

adequately protected Plaintiff’s interests. 

The Parties worked to resolve their disagreement late into the evening of July 7th. At 

approximately 5 p.m. on July 8, 2015, the Parties reached the following stipulation. 

 STIPULATION

The Parties jointly stipulate to dismiss the discovery dispute and any hearing on same 

as part of the joint stipulation as further described below, though Defendant reserves its right to seek 

to reschedule the hearing if Plaintiff fails to timely and meaningfully adhere to the terms of this 

stipulation. 

1. AMENDED DISCOVERY RESPONSES

By 5:00 p.m., on Tuesday August 4, 2015 (the “deadline”), Plaintiff will provide

Defendant with amended responses to Defendant’s Interrogatories (Set 1) and Defendant’s Requests 

For Production of Documents (Set 1). Specifically, Plaintiff will respond to all questions to which 

he has not responded and resolve incongruities and inconsistencies among his previous responses 

and document production. 

Plaintiff’s amended responses will fully comply with the Court’s “Supplemental 

Order To Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference In Civil Cases Before Judge William 

Alsup” (the “Order”). By way of example, Plaintiff will disclose the locations searched for all 

documents in compliance with the Order. Plaintiff will further reproduce all non-bate stamped 

documents in a bate-stamped format in accordance with the Order. Plaintiff’s amended responses 

and supplemental production will cover and include all electronically stored information accessible 

to him including social media such as Facebook and personal email accounts to the extent not 

previously disclosed and/or produced. Order re

Case 3:14-cv-05083-WHA Document 36 Filed 07/09/15 Page 2 of 5
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NO. 3:14-CV-05083-WHA 2. JOINT STIPULATION

RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Plaintiff agrees that, subject to an order by this Court, his failure to comply with this 

section by the deadline will subject him to appropriate sanctions, including any of the orders listed in 

FRCP 37(b)(2)(A)(i)—(vi).

Plaintiff agrees he has waived all objections by failing to provide timely responses to 

Defendant’s written discovery requests.

2. INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Plaintiff did not provide initial disclosures to Defendant until, approximately, April 

28, 2015 (well after the Court’s March 31, 2015 deadline [see Dkt #23]).

In accordance with FRCP 37(c)(1), Plaintiff agrees that for any witness not identified 

by name in Section 1 of his initial disclosures (“Individuals Associated With Plaintiff as 

Witnesses”), Plaintiff will not be allowed to use any unidentified witness to supply 

evidence on a motion, at a hearing, or at a trial.

In further accordance with FRCP 37(c)(1), Plaintiff agrees that for any information 

not provided in Section 2 or 3 of his initial disclosures (“Categories and Locations of Documents”), 

(“Computation of Damages”), Plaintiff will not be allowed to use any unidentified or 

undisclosed information to supply evidence on a motion, at a hearing, or at a trial.

No terms agreed upon in this section shall be construed or interpreted as to prevent 

any Party from filing supplemental disclosures in the event that new information and or new 

witnesses are discovered pursuant to FRCP 26. For purposes of the foregoing sentence, “new” refers

information or witnesses that were not and could not have been discovered by the Party that would 

amend its disclosures prior to the filing of this stipulation. 

Further, no terms agreed upon in this section shall be construed or interpreted in a 

manner that conflicts with any existing federal law.

3. TIMELINESS

Plaintiff (individually, or as represented by his counsel) acknowledges that he has had 

issues meeting deadlines including the failure to timely comply with past court orders (regarding 

deadlines for initial disclosures and deadlines to respond to discovery briefing), failure to timely 

respond to written discovery, and failure to timely appear for hearings or examinations (the first day 

Order re

Case 3:14-cv-05083-WHA Document 36 Filed 07/09/15 Page 3 of 5
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NO. 3:14-CV-05083-WHA 3. JOINT STIPULATION

RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

of his deposition, the second day of his deposition, the early neutral evaluation, and a previously 

scheduled discovery hearing). 

Plaintiff agrees that he (both he and his counsel) will break his habit of tardiness and 

will timely meet all prospective deadlines or obligations related to this lawsuit under pain of sanction

provided that no such sanctions shall be issued unless Plaintiff has an opportunity to explain any 

extenuating circumstances that might have caused any delay, and then, subject to the order of this 

Court.

4. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS BY THE PARTIES

Nothing stated herein is intended to limit in any way either Party’s right to seek full 

legal recourse as permitted by applicable law, including the orders of this Court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 8, 2015

/s/ Stanley Goff

STANLEY GOFF

LAW OFFICES OF STANLEY GOFF

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DARYLE WASHINGTON

Dated: July 8, 2015

/s/ Aurelio Pérez

ROD M. FLIEGEL

AURELIO J. PÉREZ 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant 

RECOLOGY SAN FRANCISCO

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document 

has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document. 

Order re

Case 3:14-cv-05083-WHA Document 36 Filed 07/09/15 Page 4 of 5
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NO. 3:14-CV-05083-WHA 4. JOINT STIPULATION

RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Dated: July 9, 2015

/s/ Aurelio Pérez

AURELIO J. PÉREZ 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________, 2015

THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP

Firmwide:134559961.5 016440.2636

Order re July 9

Case 3:14-cv-05083-WHA Document 36 Filed 07/09/15 Page 5 of 5