Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01804/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01804-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

American LegalNet, Inc.

www.USCourtForms.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TURAN RAMADAN; PATRICIA 

RAMADAN 

Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

CITY OF NAPA, PHIL BRUN and 

MICHAEL O'BRYON 

CASE NO. C 06-1804 MHP 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Defendant(s). 

/ 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes: 

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process: 

Private ADR (please identify process and provider) 

 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

other requested deadline 

Dated:June ___, 2006 /s/ Rey Hassan 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Rey Hassan 

Dated:June 14, 2006 /s/ G. Richard Brown 

Attorney for Defendant 

G. Richard Brown 

Case 3:06-cv-01804-MHP Document 9 Filed 06/15/06 Page 1 of 2
American LegalNet, Inc.

www.USCourtForms.com

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

Non-binding Arbitration 

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 

Mediation 

Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session 

90 days from the date of this order. 

other 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES JUDGE 

 

June 15, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-01804-MHP Document 9 Filed 06/15/06 Page 2 of 2