Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03250/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03250-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Counsel for the County of Mendocino, Ricky Del Forintino and Thomas Allman

appeared at the Case Management Conference.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT B. MERRIMAN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DEPUTY RICK DEL FORINTINO, et al.,

Defendants

 /

No. C 15-3250 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED; EXTENDING TIME

FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT

By order filed October 6, 2015, and served by mail on plaintiff Scott B. Merriman that

same date, the Court scheduled a Case Management Conference for November 6, 2015,

at 10:30 a.m. On November 6, 2015, plaintiff failed to appear as ordered at the Case

Management Conference.1

Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, no later

than November 25, 2015, why the action should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to prosecute.

In light of the above, the deadline for defendants County of Mendocino, Ricky Del

Forintino and Thomas Allman to respond to the complaint is hereby EXTENDED to

Case 3:15-cv-03250-MMC Document 20 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

December 18, 2015. Said extension shall also apply to any other defendant who is served,

and whose response to the complaint otherwise would be due prior to December 18, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 9, 2015 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-03250-MMC Document 20 Filed 11/09/15 Page 2 of 2