Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-00438/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-00438-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

JOINT STIPULATION RE: OPPOSITION TO MSJ AND ORDER

ELGUINDY, MEYER & KOEGEL, APC

BENJAMIN D. KOEGEL, State Bar Number 266308

bkoegel@emklawyers.com

W. PATRICK CRONICAN, State Bar Number 300645

pcronican@emklawyers.com

2990 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 205

Roseville, CA 95661

Telephone: (916) 778-3310

Facsimile: (916) 330-4433

Attorneys for Plaintiff INFINITY ENERGY, INC., 

a California Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INFINITY ENERGY, INC., a California 

Corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

INFINITE ENERGY HOMES SERVICES, 

INC.,

Defendant.

Case No.: 2:21-cv-00438-WBS-KJN

JOINT STIPULATION RE: OPPOSITION 

TO INFINITE ENERGY HOMES 

SERVICES, INC.’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER 

THEREON

DATE: May 30, 2023

TIME: 1:30 p.m.

CTRM: 5

JUDGE: Hon. William B. Shubb

MAG.: Hon. Kendall J. Newman

FILED: March 10, 2021

TRIAL: September 19, 2023

WHEREAS: Defendant INFINITE ENERGY HOME SERVICES, INC. (“Defendant”) 

has filed a Motion for Summary Judgement (the “Motion”) in the present matter;

WHEREAS: Due to a technical issue Defendant was unable to e-file the Motion on April 

24, 2023;

/ / /

Case 2:21-cv-00438-WBS-KJN Document 39 Filed 05/10/23 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

JOINT STIPULATION RE: OPPOSITION TO MSJ AND ORDER

WHEREAS: Defendant advised Plaintiff INFINITY ENERGY, INC. (“Plaintiff”) of the 

e-filing technical issues and the forthcoming filing at counsel’s earliest opportunity;

WHEREAS: Given the technical issues related to the filing and the desire of the parties 

not to prejudice Plaintiff’s ability to properly oppose the Motion, the parties have agreed and 

stipulated to extend the time for Plaintiff to file its Opposition to the Motion to May 12, 2023.

IT IS HEREBY STIPLUATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant 

that;

(1) Despite the technical issues associated with e-filing the Motion, the Motion was timely 

filed;

(2) Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion shall be filed by May 12, 2023.

IT IS HEREBY STIPLUATED:

Dated: May 8, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

ELGUINDY, MEYER & KOEGEL, APC

By: /s/ W. Patrick Cronican

Benjamin D. Koegel, Esq. 

W. Patrick Cronican, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff INFINITY ENGERY, INC., a 

California Corporation

Dated: May 8, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

KROGH & DECKER, LLP

By: /s/ Michael Croddy

Shawn M. Krogh, Esq.

Cagil Arel, Esq.

Michael Croddy, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant INFINITE ENERGY HOME 

SERVICES, INC.

Case 2:21-cv-00438-WBS-KJN Document 39 Filed 05/10/23 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

JOINT STIPULATION RE: OPPOSITION TO MSJ AND ORDER

ORDER

Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Stipulation IT IS SO ORDERED:

(1) Defendant’s Motion was timely filed;

(2) Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion shall be filed by May 12, 2023.

IT IS ORDERED.

Dated: May 9, 2023

Case 2:21-cv-00438-WBS-KJN Document 39 Filed 05/10/23 Page 3 of 3