Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00527/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00527-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN RAY PERRIDON,

Plaintiff,

v.

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00527-SMS PC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CATE’S

REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM

RESPONDING TO THE COMPLAINT, AND

FOR A THIRTY DAY EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT, TO

COMMENCE UPON ISSUANCE OF

SCREENING ORDER

(Doc. 1)

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO

CONSENT TO OR DECLINE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE JURISDICTION WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

(Doc. 3)

Plaintiff Steven Ray Perridon is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action. 

Defendant Cate removed the action from Kern CountySuperior Court on March 24, 2010. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1441(b). Defendant requests to be relieved of his obligation to respond to the complaint pending

screening by the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c). Defendant seeks a

thirty-day extension of time to respond to the complaint, to commence upon issuance of the

screening order.

Defendant’s request is HEREBY GRANTED, and Defendant shall have thirty (30) days to

file a response to the complaint, to commence upon issuance of the screening order. Defendant is 

///

1

Case 1:10-cv-00527-OWW -JLT Document 6 Filed 08/02/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDERED to consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction within thirty (30) days, in

compliance with the order filed March 25, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 30, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00527-OWW -JLT Document 6 Filed 08/02/10 Page 2 of 2