Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01150/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01150-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DARRYL J. HOROWITT, #100898

KURT V. JAENIKE #112537

COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

Attorneys at Law

499 West Shaw, Suite 116

Fresno, California 93704

Telephone: (559) 248-4820

Facsimile: (559) 248-4830

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION, successor in interest by

consolidation to Placer Sierra Bank, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SHREE BALAJI HOSPITALITY, LP, a

California Limited Partnership;

BALWANTSINH DOLATSINHM

THAKOR, an individual; LABATEN

BALWANTSINH THAKOR, an

individual; EDF RESOURCE CAPITAL,

INC.; U.S. SMALL BUSINESS

ADMINISTRATION; CITY OF

OAKDALE and DOES 1 through 50,

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 1:10-CV-01150-AWI-DLB

STIPULATION FOR THE

ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO

EXTEND THE STATE COURT’S

AMENDED EX PARTE ORDER

APPOINTING RECEIVER AND

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER; ORDER

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff, WELLS FARGO BANK,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, successor in interest by consolidation to Placer Sierra Bank

(“WFB”), and Defendants, SHREE BALAJI HOSPITALITY, LP, a California Limited

Partnership (“SBH”); BALWANTSINH DOLATSINHM THAKOR, an individual

(“BALWANTSINH”); LABATEN BALWANTSINH THAKOR, an individual (“LABATEN”);

EDF RESOURCE CAPITAL, INC. (“EDF”); UNITED STATES OF AMERICA on behalf of

1

 Case No. 1:10-CV-01150-AWI-DLB 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER AND TRO

Case 1:10-cv-01150-AWI -DLB Document 6 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 

Shree Balaji Hospitality, LP

Case No. 1:10-CV-01150-AWI-DLB

its agency, U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (“USA”); and the CITY OF

OAKDALE, a government entity (“CITY”), by and through their respective attorneys of record,

on the following recitals, terms, and conditions:

RECITALS

This Stipulation is entered into with the following facts taken into consideration:

A. On or about June 9, 2010, the Stanislaus County Superior Court heard, on an ex

parte basis, Plaintiff WFB’s application for appointment of receiver, temporary restraining order,

and order to show cause re confirmation of appointment of receiver. True and correct copies of

the ex parte application and declaration of Kurt V. Jaenike are attached hereto as Exhibits 1

and 2.

B. On or about June 9, 2010, Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Roger M.

Beauchesne entered an Ex Parte Order Appointing Receiver and Order to Show Cause and

Temporary Restraining Order. On or about June 11, 2010, Stanislaus County Superior Court

Judge Roger M. Beauchesne entered an Amended Ex Parte Order Appointing Receiver and Order

to Show Cause and Temporary Restraining Order. True and correct copies of the ex parte order

and amended ex parte order are attached hereto as Exhibits 3 and 4.

C. An order to show cause to confirm receiver and for preliminary injunction was

duly scheduled to be heard on June 25, 2010, in the Stanislaus County Superior Court.

D. On or about July 1, 2010, the temporary restraining order and receivership expire.

E. The parties have agreed that, to maintain the status quo pending a hearing in this

Court of the confirmation of the appointment of the receiver and the issuance of a preliminary

injunction, the temporary restraining order and order appointing the receiver issued on June 9,

2010, and amended on June 11, 2010, shall remain in effect past the original expiration date of

July 1, 2010, up to and including July 29, 2010, unless the court conducts a hearing on the

confirmation of the appointment of the receiver and the issuance of a preliminary injunction prior

2

 Case No. 1:10-CV-01150-AWI-DLB 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER AND TRO

Case 1:10-cv-01150-AWI -DLB Document 6 Filed 07/06/10 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 

Shree Balaji Hospitality, LP

Case No. 1:10-CV-01150-AWI-DLB

to that date. The parties thus enter into this Stipulation to permit such to occur.

STIPULATION

With the above facts taken into consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which are

hereby acknowledged, the parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate

and agree as follows:

1. Incorporation of Recitals. Paragraphs A through E, inclusive, of the Recitals

hereof are fully incorporated herein and are true and correct. These Recitals are intended and

shall be deemed and construed to be a material and integral portion of this Stipulation.

2. Extension of TRO and Order Appointing Receiver. In order to maintain the status

quo pending a hearing in this Court of the confirmation of the appointment of the receiver and

the issuance of a preliminary injunction that the temporary restraining order and order appointing

the receiver issued on June 9, 2010, and amended on June 11, 2010, shall remain in effect past

the original expiration date of July 1, 2010, up to and including July 29, 2010, unless the court

conducts a hearing on the confirmation of the appointment of the receiver and the issuance of a

preliminary injunction prior to that date.

3. Scheduling of Hearing. A hearing on Plaintiff’s OSC re confirmation of the

appointment of the receiver and the issuance of a preliminary injunction that the temporary

restraining order and order appointing the receiver issued on June 9, 2010, and amended on

June 11, 2010, shall be scheduled on the first date available by the court prior to July 29, 2010.

4. Execution in Counterparts. This Stipulation may be executed in 

counterparts and a facsimile and/or an electronic signature shall be considered as valid as an

original.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

3

 Case No. 1:10-CV-01150-AWI-DLB 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER AND TRO

Case 1:10-cv-01150-AWI -DLB Document 6 Filed 07/06/10 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 

Shree Balaji Hospitality, LP

Case No. 1:10-CV-01150-AWI-DLB

Dated: June 30, 2010 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

 By: /s/ Darryl J. Horowitt 

DARRYL J. HOROWITT 

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION, successor in interest by

consolidation to Placer Sierra Bank 

Dated: July 1, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL TIMOTHY HEATH 

 

By: See E-Mails attached as Attachment 1 

 MICHAEL TIMOTHY HEATH

 Attorney for Defendants,

SHREE BALAJI HOSPITALITY, LP, a

California Limited Partnership; BALWANTSINH

DOLATSINHM THAKOR, an individual;

LABATEN BALWANTSINH THAKOR, an

individual

Dated: June 30, 2010 REAL ESTATE LAW GROUP LLP 

By: /s/ Jason L. Hoffman 

JASON L. HOFFMAN

 Attorney for Defendant,

EDF RESOURCE CAPITAL, INC.

Dated: July 1, 2010 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

United States Attorney

 By: /s/ Jeffrey J. Lodge 

JEFFREY J. LODGE

 Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

/ / /

4

 Case No. 1:10-CV-01150-AWI-DLB 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER AND TRO

Case 1:10-cv-01150-AWI -DLB Document 6 Filed 07/06/10 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 

Shree Balaji Hospitality, LP

Case No. 1:10-CV-01150-AWI-DLB

Dated: __________, 2010

Authorized to file without signature 

THOMAS P. HALLINAN

Attorney for Defendant,

CITY OF OAKDALE, a government entity

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. In order to maintain the status quo pending a hearing in this Court of the

confirmation of the appointment of the receiver and the issuance of a preliminary injunction that

the temporary restraining order and order appointing the receiver issued on June 9, 2010, and

amended on June 11, 2010, shall remain in effect past the original expiration date of July 1,

2010, up to and including July 29, 2010, unless the court conducts a hearing on the confirmation

of the appointment of the receiver and the issuance of a preliminary injunction prior to that date.

2. The hearing on Plaintiff’s OSC re confirmation of the appointment of the receiver

and the issuance of a preliminary injunction shall be heard on July 26, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. in

Courtroom __2__ of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 3, 2010 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

5

 Case No. 1:10-CV-01150-AWI-DLB 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER AND TRO

Case 1:10-cv-01150-AWI -DLB Document 6 Filed 07/06/10 Page 5 of 5