Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-00196/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-00196-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER JOHN WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

TUOLUMNE COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:21-cv-00196-SKO (PC)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF AS 

UNNECESSARY

(Doc. 15)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On August 12, 2021, 

the Court issued an order denying as moot Plaintiff’s motion for a “legal runner,” “legal phone 

calls,” a “writing tablet,” envelopes, pencils, and an eraser. (Doc. 13.)

On September 1, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion stating he agrees with the Court’s ruling 

regarding the aforementioned issues. (Doc. 15.) He requests, however, that the Court not “deny 

[his] rights” regarding his claims of excessive force and improper medical care. (Id. at 1.) 

Plaintiff’s motion is unnecessary. The Court only ruled on Plaintiff’s request for the 

abovementioned items; it has not ruled on the merits of his case.

As explained in the Court’s First Informational Order, Plaintiff’s complaint is subject to 

screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). The Court will screen Plaintiff’s complaint in due 

course.

///

Case 1:21-cv-00196-KES-SKO Document 16 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 3, 2021 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:21-cv-00196-KES-SKO Document 16 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2