Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01148/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01148-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TYRONE CLATION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-01148-OWW-SMS PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 23)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH

RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED UNDER

SECTION 1983 (Doc. 22)

ORDER THAT THIS DISMISSAL

COUNTS AS A STRIKE PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1915(G)

Plaintiff Tyrone Clation (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and

Local Rule 72-302.

On January 3, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

Case 1:05-cv-01148-OWW -SMS Document 25 Filed 03/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. On

February 2, 2007, plaintiff filed an objection to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)

and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of

this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court

finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the

record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 3, 2007,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for plaintiff’s

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted

under section 1983; and

3. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 20, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01148-OWW -SMS Document 25 Filed 03/21/07 Page 2 of 2