Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00745/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00745-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTHONY JAMA HALL, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 

OFSOCIAL SERVICES, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-745-KJM-EFB PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 

undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On May 5, 2015, 

the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. The order explained the 

complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint correcting those 

deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 12. On June 1, 2015, plaintiff requested 

an extension of time to file his amended complaint and/or a motion for reconsideration of the 

May 5, 2015 order. That request was granted on June 18, 2015, ECF No. 15, and plaintiff’s 

amended complaint was due thirty days later. 

 The deadline has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 

responded to the order. 

Case 2:14-cv-00745-KJM-EFB Document 16 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the 

Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: July 27, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-00745-KJM-EFB Document 16 Filed 07/28/15 Page 2 of 2