Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02046/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02046-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY JOHNSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-05-2046 RRB KJM 

vs.

CLAIR COUTURIER, JR., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

 Defendant’s motion to enforce deposition subpoena has been noticed for hearing

on November 7, 2007. Upon review of the documents in support, no opposition having yet been

filed, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

The subpoena defendant seeks to enforce is invalid inasmuch as the subpoena

issued from the Eastern District of California and notices the deposition in San Francisco, which

is located in the Northern District of California. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(2)(B); see generally

Kupritz v. Savannah College of Art & Design, 155 F.R.D. 84, 88 (E.D. Pa. 1994). Accordingly,

the motion to enforce subpoena is denied without prejudice to its renewal after service of a valid

subpoena. 

DATED: October 3, 2007.

006 johnson-couturier.sub

Case 2:05-cv-02046-WBS-KJN Document 223 Filed 10/04/07 Page 1 of 1