Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01206/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01206-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The parties agreed that subpoenaed records related to the plaintiffs would be produced to the 

Court for an in camera review. They agreed that in the event the Court finds records that should be 

disclosed, it will issue an order describing the records generally and identifying them by Bates 

number. In this event, the Court would give plaintiffs a deadline by which they will indicate whether 

they continue to object to the production of the records. If they do, the Court will decide whether a 

further conference would be fruitful or simply authorize defendant to proceed with a motion to 

compel. In the event the Court finds no records should be disclosed, the Court will issue an order 

broadly outlining its findings and indicating that the subpoenas should be quashed. 

The Court has conducted the review of records produced by CLP Resources, Inc. as to 

plaintiff, Gerald Walker (no other records have been produced to the Court as of the signing of this 

order). After doing so, the Court finds that all records from this location should be disclosed except 

GERALD GLENN WALKER, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING, INC., et 

al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01206 - JLT

ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW OF 

RECORDS PRODUCED BY CLP RESOURCES, 

INC.

Case 1:15-cv-01206-JLT Document 30 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

that Mr. Walker’s social security number and driver’s license number may be redacted from all 

documents. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. No later than July 1, 2016, Mr. Walker SHALL file a statement with the Court 

indicating whether he still objects to disclosure of the documents. If he does, he SHALL identify the 

specific pages of the record to which he objects to disclosure and the basis for the objection.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 21, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01206-JLT Document 30 Filed 06/21/16 Page 2 of 2