Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00583/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00583-50/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

423.01.PLE.stipulation.extend.time.wpd 1

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR FRU-CON HOLDING CORP. TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIM

MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP

KENNETH C. MENNEMEIER (SBN 113973)

980 9th Street, Suite 1700

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 553-4000

Facsimile: (916) 553-4011

E-mail: kcm@mgslaw.com

Attorneys for Counterdefendant

FRU-CON HOLDING CORPORATION

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT

OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

ARLEN ORCHARD (SBN 143015)

STEVEN M. COHN (SBN 88565)

6201 “S” Street

Sacramento, CA 95817

Telephone: (916) 732-5847

Facsimile: (916) 732-6581

BRIGHT AND BROWN

JAMES S. BRIGHT (SBN 65299)

MAUREEN J. BRIGHT (SBN 81589)

BRIAN L. BECKER (SBN 115431)

SHARON M. APODACA (SBN 213798)

550 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 2100

Glendale, CA 91203

Telephone: (818) 243-2121

Facsimile: (818) 243-3225

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

PHILIP S. WARDEN (SBN 54752)

JOHN S. POULOS (SBN 154689)

CHRISTOPHER R. RODRIGUEZ (SBN 212274)

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700

Sacramento, CA 95814-4419

Telephone: (916) 329-4700

Facsimile: (916) 441-3583

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT

Case 2:05-cv-00583-LKK -GGH Document 384 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

423.01.PLE.stipulation.extend.time.wpd 2

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR FRU-CON HOLDING CORP. TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION

CORPORATION, a Missouri corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY

DISTRICT, a municipal utility district;

UTILITY ENGINEERING

CORPORATION, a Texas corporation,

Defendants.

____________________________________

AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIMS

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 05-CV-00583 LKK GGH

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR

COUNTERDEFENDANT FRU-CON

HOLDING CORPORATION TO RESPOND

TO FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM;

 ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

COUNTERDEFENDANT FRU-CON

HOLDING CORPORATION TO RESPOND

TO FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM 

Pursuant to Local Rules 83-143 (addressing “Stipulations”) and 6-144 (addressing

“Extending and Shortening Time”), Counterclaimant Sacramento Municipal Utility District (the

“District”) and Counterdefendant Fru-Con Holding Corporation (“FCHC”) respectfully submit

the following stipulation. 

Recitals

Whereas, this action was filed in March 2005;

Whereas, the Court granted the District leave to file a First Amended

Counterclaim and the District filed its First Amended Counterclaim on December 22, 2006; 

Whereas, the District served its First Amended Counterclaim on FCHC on or

about March 19, 2007; and

Whereas, FCHC has requested a 90-day extension of time to respond to the

District’s First Amended Counterclaim, and the District is willing to grant that requested

extension; 

Stipulation

The parties, by and through their counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. The time in which FCHC must respond to the District’s First Amended

Counterclaim shall be extended from April 9, 2007, to July 9, 2007 (i.e., a 90-day extension); 

Case 2:05-cv-00583-LKK -GGH Document 384 Filed 04/10/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

423.01.PLE.stipulation.extend.time.wpd 3

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR FRU-CON HOLDING CORP. TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIM

2. There have not been any prior extensions of time for FCHC’s response to

the District’s First Amended Counterclaim (see Local Rule 6-144(b)); and

3. This stipulation does not constitute a general appearance or submission to

jurisdiction by FCHC, and is without prejudice to any of FCHC’s defenses, including but not

limited to its right to contest personal jurisdiction or raise any other defenses under Rules 8, 9, or

12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Dated: April 6, 2007 MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP

KENNETH C. MENNEMEIER

By: /s/ Kenneth C. Mennemeier 

Kenneth C. Mennemeier, Attorneys for

Counterdefendant FRU-CON HOLDING

CORPORATION

Dated: April 5, 2007 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

JOHN S. POULOS

By: /s/ John S. Poulos 

John S. Poulos, Attorneys for Counterclaimant

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY

DISTRICT

(As authorized by Counsel on April 5, 2007)

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 10, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-00583-LKK -GGH Document 384 Filed 04/10/07 Page 3 of 3