Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01390/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01390-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 The court is cognizant that the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment 1

entailed significant work. However, in this age of word processors, undue duplication should be

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY JOHN MULLER III,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1390 GEB GGH PS

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF ORDER

DEPARTMENT, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

Presently pending are defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s

cross-motion for summary judgment, scheduled for hearing on September 28, 2006. Also pending

is plaintiff’s motion to amend his First Amended Complaint, scheduled for hearing on October 19,

2006. 

Upon review of the motion to amend and proposed second amended complaint, as

well as the parties’ motions for summary judgment, the court concludes the motion to amend

should proceed to hearing on October 19, 2006. As a result, the September 28, 2006 hearing on

the motions for summary judgment will be vacated and the motions denied without prejudice to

their renotice following this court’s decision on plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint. 1

Case 2:05-cv-01390-GEB-GGH Document 50 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

alleviated. The court will endeavor to accommodate any reasonable request to rely on documents

already filed.

2

Outstanding dates, including the current October 19, 2006 deadline for filing dispositive motions,

will be reevaluated as appropriate following the court’s decision on plaintiff’s motion to amend.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The September 28, 2006 hearing is vacated;

2. The following motions are denied without prejudice: (a) Defendants’ Amended

Motion for Summary Judgment filed August 4, 2006; and (b) Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for

Summary Judgment filed August 24, 2006; and

3. On October 19, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., the court will hear plaintiff’s Motion to

Amend the First Amended Complaint.

So ordered.

DATED: 9/22/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

 U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOW6:Muller1390.9.28.06

Case 2:05-cv-01390-GEB-GGH Document 50 Filed 09/22/06 Page 2 of 2