Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02595/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02595-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

11950/0104/983690.1 FURTHER STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No. 2-11-CV-02595-JAM-DAD 

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NIALL P. MCCARTHY (State Bar No. 160175) 

nmccarthy@cpmlegal.com

JUSTIN T. BERGER (State Bar No. 250346) 

jberger@cpmlegal.com

ERIC J. BUESCHER (State Bar No. 271323) 

ebuescher@cpmlegal.com

COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP 

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 

Burlingame, CA 94010 

Telephone: (650) 697-6000 

Facsimile: (650) 692-3606 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SHEILA GOODEN 

MICHAEL J. STEINER (State Bar No. 112079) 

mjs@severson.com

PHILIP BARILOVITS (State Bar No. 199944) 

pb@severson.com

SEVERSON & WERSON 

A Professional Corporation 

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 398-3344 

Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. 

SUNTRUST BANKS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SHEILA GOODEN, an individual,

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. a Virginia 

corporation, SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., a 

Georgia corporation, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 2-11-CV-02595-JAM-DAD

FURTHER STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING TIME FOR SUNTRUST 

MORTGAGE, INC. AND SUNTRUST 

BANKS, INC. TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD Document 10 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 3
11950/0104/983690.1 

- - 

FURTHER STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 2-11-CV-02595-JAM-DAD

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 1

WHEREAS, Sheila Gooden (“Plaintiff”) filed a Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) in the 

above-entitled case against defendants SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. and SunTrust Banks, Inc. (together, 

the “Defendants”); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants stipulated, pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 144, that 

Defendants had up to and including November 23, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to the 

Complaint; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants are in still in discussions regarding a possible 

amendment of the Complaint and/or resolution of the case and Plaintiff and Defendants have 

stipulated that Defendants may have up to and including December 19, 2011 to answer or otherwise 

respond to the complaint 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, SUBJECT TO COURT ORDER, THAT: 

Defendants have up to and including December 19, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to 

the Complaint. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: November 18, 2011 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 

 By: /s/ Justin T. Berger 

 JUSTIN T. BERGER 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SHEILA GOODEN 

DATED: November 18, 2011 SEVERSON & WERSON 

 By: /s/ Philip Barilovits 

 PHILIP BARILOVITS 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. 

 SUNTRUST BANKS, INC. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD Document 10 Filed 11/18/11 Page 2 of 3
11950/0104/983690.1 

- - 

FURTHER STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 2-11-CV-02595-JAM-DAD

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 1

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 11/18/2011 

/s/ John A. Mendez_______________

 HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ 

U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD Document 10 Filed 11/18/11 Page 3 of 3