Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02279/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02279-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

WILKE, FLEURY,

HOFFELT, GOULD &

BIRNEY, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

- 1 - 

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & 

BIRNEY, LLP 

Kelli M. Kennaday, Bar No. 155153 

kkennaday@wilkefleury.com

Kim Johnston, Bar No. 196961 

kjohnston@wilkefleury.com

400 Capitol Mall, Twenty-Second Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 441-2430 

Facsimile: (916) 442-6664 

E-mail: kkennaday@wilkefleury.com

VEDDER, PRICE, KAUFMAN & KAMMHOLZ, 

P.C. 

ANTHONY J. ASHLEY 

CHRISTOPHER L. NYBO 

222 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2600 

Chicago, IL 60601-1003 

Telephone: (312) 609-7500 

Facsimile: (312) 609-5005 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PUROLATOR ADVANCED FILTRATION 

GROUP, INC., d/b/a FILTER PRODUCTS, INC. 

and FPI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PUROLATOR ADVANCED 

FILTRATION GROUP, INC., a Delaware 

corporation (d/b/a FILTER PRODUCTS, 

INC. and FPI), 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CRUZ COMPANY, a California 

corporation (d/b/a FILTRATION 

PROCESS INNOVATORS, CO.); RENO 

N. CRUZ, JR., an individual; and LESLIE 

F. MATSON, an individual, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:05-CV-2279-MCE-GGH 

STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND ORDER 

[Fed. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(ii)] 

/ / / 

/ / / 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-02279-MCE -GGH Document 22 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 2
WILKE, FLEURY,

HOFFELT, GOULD &

BIRNEY, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

- 2 - 

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(ii), the parties hereby 

stipulate that this matter be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice, with all parties to bear their 

own fees and costs. The parties further stipulate that the Court will retain jurisdiction over the 

parties and this matter for purposes of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement And Mutual 

Release. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: February 23, 2006 WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, 

GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 

By: /S/ 

KELLI M. KENNADAY 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PUROLATOR ADVANCED 

FILTRATION GROUP, INC. 

DATED: February 23, 2006 SACINO, BERTOLINO & HALLISSY 

By: /S/ 

RICHARD P. BERTOLINO 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CRUZ COMPANY (dba FILTRATION 

PROCESS INNOVATORS, CO.), RENO 

N. CRUZ, JR., and LESLIE F. MATSON 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 23, 2006 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-02279-MCE -GGH Document 22 Filed 02/24/06 Page 2 of 2