Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00798/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00798-70/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOOP AI LABS INC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANNA GATTI, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)

ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION RE DEPOSITION OF 

ROBERTO PIERACCINI

Re: Dkt. No. 521

The court has received Defendant Almawave USA, Inc.’s (“Almawave”) administrative 

motion for leave to file a unilateral letter brief to compel Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc.’s compliance 

with the court’s March 22, 2016 order regarding the deposition of Roberto Pieraccini (Docket No. 

511). [Docket No. 521.] In the March 22, 2016 order, the court ordered Plaintiff to produce 

Pieraccini for up to three hours of deposition at a location convenient to the witness. The court 

will rule on Almawave’s administration upon completion of the briefing. See Civ. L.R. 7-11(b) 

(any opposition to a motion for administrative relief due four days after the motion is filed). 

The court notes that counsel has not sought or obtained a stay of the March 22, 2016 order 

or any other discovery orders by the undersigned. Accordingly, counsel are on notice that all 

parties must comply with the undersigned’s orders unless and until they are relieved from such 

obligations by court order. See, e.g., Verizon Cal. Inc. v. OnlineNIC, Inc., 647 F. Supp. 2d 1110, 

1116 (N.D. Cal. 2009) (“a party may not disregard the clear terms of a court order, even if that 

party believes the order to be misguided, mistaken, or otherwise incorrect.”); see also Chapman v. 

Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co., 613 F.2d 193, 197 (9th Cir. 1979) (“An attorney who believes a court order 

is erroneous is not relieved of the duty to obey it.”). Any party that fails to comply with the 

Case 4:15-cv-00798-HSG Document 527 Filed 03/25/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

undersigned’s orders is subject to sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 25, 2016

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:15-cv-00798-HSG Document 527 Filed 03/25/16 Page 2 of 2