Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02138/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02138-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 06 CV 2138 CW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING 

DISCOVERY AND RESETTING CASE SCHEDULE

-1- 

DM_US:20438157_1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

ATMEL CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation; ATMEL SWITZERLAND, a 

corporation; ATMEL FRANCE, a corporation; 

and ATMEL SARL, a corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AUTHENTEC, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

 Case No. 06 CV 2138 CW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

STAYING DISCOVERY AND RESETTING 

CASE SCHEDULE 

The parties hereby submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Discovery and Resetting 

Case Schedule. The parties agree that an interim stay of discovery is appropriate in view of the 

currently pending Motion to Dismiss and the current state of discovery. The parties also agree to a 

revised schedule that extends the re-opened discovery period for 60 days in the event that the Motion 

to Dismiss is denied. In view of the foregoing, 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Atmel Corporation, Atmel 

Switzerland, Atmel France, and Atmel SARL (collectively “Atmel”) and Defendant AuthenTec, Inc. 

(“AuthenTec”) as follows: 

Case 4:06-cv-02138-CW Document 72 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 06 CV 2138 CW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING 

DISCOVERY AND RESETTING CASE SCHEDULE

-2- 

DM_US:20438157_1 

1. Discovery (including discovery motion practice) is hereby stayed until the motion to 

dismiss is decided. Notwithstanding the above, the stay is to be lifted after 60 days unless a party can 

show good cause not to lift the discovery stay. 

2. During the stay, the parties will meet and confer in an attempt to resolve all outstanding 

discovery disputes. If the parties reach agreement that certain discovery should occur, each party will 

have ten (10) days after the stay is lifted to comply with the agreed upon discovery obligations. 

3. If the motion to dismiss is denied, and the stay is lifted, the discovery period will be 90 

days, and the remainder of the schedule (including claim construction discovery and briefing) will be 

reset in accordance with the terms of the current schedule after the close of the new discovery period. 

Either party may request additional time for discovery on a showing of good cause. 

4. The parties’ agreement is without prejudice to either parties’ respective positions on the 

propriety of the Florida action. 

5. Atmel’s objections to AuthenTec’s deposition notices served on May 8, 2007 may be 

served ten (10) days after the discovery period re-opens. 

Dated: May 17, 2007 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

By: /s/ Olivia M. Kim 

 Olivia M. Kim 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ATMEL CORPORATION, ATMEL 

SWITZERLAND, ATMEL FRANCE, and 

ATMEL SARL 

Dated: May 17, 2007 HOWREY LLP 

By: /s/ Denise M. De Mory 

 Denise M. De Mory

Attorneys for Defendant 

AUTHENTEC, INC. 

Case 4:06-cv-02138-CW Document 72 Filed 05/21/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 06 CV 2138 CW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING 

DISCOVERY AND RESETTING CASE SCHEDULE

-3- 

DM_US:20438157_1 

ATTESTATION AS TO CONCURRENCE

I, Denise M. De Mory, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America, 

attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 

signatories to this document. 

 /s/ Denise M. De Mory 

Denise M. De Mory 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May ____, 2007 

HON. CLAUDIA WILKIN 

JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

21

Case 4:06-cv-02138-CW Document 72 Filed 05/21/07 Page 3 of 3