Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-00871/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-00871-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LEONARD TOBIA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., a 

California Corporation dba Dollar Tree 

Store # 4760; KEVIN WAMPLER; and 

DOES 1-10, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:18-cv-871-MCE-EFB PS 

ORDER 

On February 24, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.1

 Accordingly, the Court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United 

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 

///// 

1

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 

recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 

keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 

of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 

Case 2:18-cv-00871-MCE-EFB Document 8 Filed 03/23/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed February 24, 2020, are

ADOPTED; 

2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court

orders; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; and 

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 23, 2020

Case 2:18-cv-00871-MCE-EFB Document 8 Filed 03/23/20 Page 2 of 2