Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-06209/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-06209-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:405 Fair Housing Act

---

1

2

a

J

4

5

6

7

8

9

1 0

1 1

t 2

t a

I J

1 4

l 5

1 6

1 l

1 8

1 9

20

2 1

22

Z J

1 A

L 1

25

26

27

28

D. SCOTT CHANG, SBN 146403

MARY J. HAHN*

JOHN P. RELMAN*

RELMAN & DANE, PLLC

1225 lgtn Street, N.W., Suite 600

Washington, DC 20036-2456

Telephone: (202) 728- I 888

Facsimile: (20D 728-0848

schang@relmanlaw,com

mhahn@relmanlaw.com

i relman@relmanlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

AHSAN KAHN, et al.

KEVrN K. CHOLAKTAN (S.8, # 103423)

VIVIAN L. LERCHE (S.8. # 149984)

CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES

A Professional Corporation

5 Thomas Mellon Circle, Suite 105

San Francisco, CA 94134

Telephone: (415) 467 -8200

Facsimile: Al5\ 467 -8206

kc h o I aki an fdc ho I aki an. net

v I erche(4lcho I aki an. net

Attorneys for Defendant

SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY

LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AHSAN KHAN AND SALEHA KHAN,

individually and on behalf of their minor

children, IRFAN KHAN, ASIF KHAN,

NOREEN KHAN, KAYNAT KHAN,

LAIBA KHAN and BILAL KIjAN, and

RHEANNA KHAN" individuallv.

Plaintiff,

VS,

SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING

AUTHORITY.

Case No.: CY 07-6209 CRB

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO

RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS AND

RESETTING HEARING OF MOTION

TO DISMISS; IPROPOSEDI ORDER

Defendants.

I

JOINT S-|IPTJLATION TO EXT'END TIME TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT'S MOTION 1'O DISMISS AND RESET HEARING

DATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. C-07-6209-CRB

Case 4:07-cv-06209-CW Document 22 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 3
I

2

a

J

4

5

6

7

8

9

l 0

1 l

t 2

1 a

I J

1 A t +

1 5

t 6

1 -

L /

1 8

t 9

20

2 1

22

Z )

1 AL A

25

zo

27

28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties respectfully submit this stipulation to allow

Plaintiffs to submit their response memorandum in opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss

(R. 9, Feb. 15,2008) on Friday, April4, 2008, and a resetting of the hearing date of said motion

until April 25,2008, at 10:00 AM. Under the current schedule, Plaintiffs'brief in opposition to

the motion to dismiss is due on Friday, March 14, 2008, and the motion is currently noticed to be

heard on April 4,2008.

There is good cause for this request for extension of time. The parties are currently in

settlement discussions and seek this extension of time for the purpose of minimizing the

unnecessary expenditure of attorneys' fees, thereby lowering the cost of settlement.

This is the first request to the Courl for a modification to the briefing schedule on

Defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs previously consented to an extension of time for

Defendants to file their answer and/or motion to dismiss from January 28, 2008 to February 15,

2008. The parties previously stipulated to a continuance of the case management conference,

which is now scheduled to take place on March 28, 2008, at 8:30 AM. (R. 20, March 6, 2008.)

The parties do not believe that this extension of time will have any effect on the schedule

fbr the case.

DATED: March 7.2008 RELMAN & DANE" PLLC

DATED: March 7,2008

D. Scott Chang

Mary J. Hahn

John P. Relman

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

AHSAN KAHN, et al.

CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES

Kevin K. Cholakian

Vivian Leung Lerche

Attornevs for Defbndant

SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING

ATJTHORITY

By /sl

By ts/

2

JOIN'I'STIPUI,A'IION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT'S MOI'ION TO DISMISS AND RESET HEARING

DA fE: [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. C'07-6209-CRB

Case 4:07-cv-06209-CW Document 22 Filed 03/13/08 Page 2 of 3
I

2

a

J

A

T

5

6

7

8

I

1 0

1 l

l 2

l 3

1 4

1 5

t 6

1 7

1 8

l 9

20

2 l

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IPROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuanto stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, Plaintiffs' brief in opposition

to Defendant's motion to dismiss shall be submitted on April 4, 2008, and the hearing on

Defendant's motion to dismiss shall be set for April 25, 2008, at 8:30 a.m.

It is so ordered.

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

United States District Judse

3

JOINI-STIPULAI]ON TO EXT'END TIME TO RESPOND TO

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND RESETIIEARING

IJATE; IPROPoSED] ORDER; CASE NO. C-07-6209-CRB

Signed: March 13, 2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

10:00 a.m.

Case 4:07-cv-06209-CW Document 22 Filed 03/13/08 Page 3 of 3