Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01207/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01207-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED] ORDER PROVIDING FOR

Doc# DEPOSITION OF SAMSUNG 30(b)(6) WITNESSES 2472717\1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

James P. McCarthy (pro hac vice) 

James M. Lockhart (pro hac vice)

Lindquist & Vennum P.L.L.P. 

4200 IDS Center – 80 South 8th Street 

Minneapolis, MN 55402 

Telephone: (612) 371-3211 

Facsimile: (612) 371-3207 

Email: jmccarthy@lindquist.com 

Email: jlockhart@lindquist.com 

James J. Ficenec (SBN – 152172) 

Sellar Hazard Manning Ficenec & Lai 

1800 Sutter Street, Ste. 460 

Concord, CA 94520 

Telephone: (925) 938-1430 

Facsimile: (925) 926-7508 

Email: jficenec@sellarlaw.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

Sun Microsystems, Inc., et al. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al. 

(Case No. C-06-01665 PJH ) 

Unisys Corporation v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al. (Case No. C-06-

02915 PJH) 

Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al. (Case No. C-07-

01212 PJH) 

Edge Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al. (Case No. C-07-

01207 PJH) 

All American Semiconductor, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al. 

(Case No. C-07-01200 PJH) 

DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust, by its 

Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al. (Case No. C-07-

01381 PJH) 

 Case No. C-06-01665 PJH 

 Case No. C-06-02915 PJH 

Case No. C-07-01200 PJH 

Case No. C-07-01207 PJH 

Case No. C-07-01212 PJH 

Case No. C-07-01381 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

PROVIDING FOR DEPOSITION OF 

SAMSUNG 30(b)(6) WITNESSES AND 

SUPPLEMENTATION OF SAMSUNG’S 

INTERROGATORY ANSWERS AFTER 

FACT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 

Case 4:07-cv-01207-PJH Document 120 Filed 12/21/07 Page 1 of 4
2 

STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED] ORDER PROVIDING FOR

DEPOSITION OF SAMSUNG 30(b)(6) WITNESSES

Doc# 2472717\1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs served on July 27, 2007, 30(b)(6) Notices of Deposition on 

Samsung Electronic Co. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively “Samsung”); 

WHEREAS, on November 15, 2007, Samsung produced a witness who testified regarding 

Samsung’s manufacture, production, and inventory of DRAM in the United States, but was not 

able to testify regarding Samsung’s manufacture, production, and inventory of DRAM outside the 

United States; 

WHEREAS, Samsung has agreed to designate an additional 30(b)(6) witness to testify 

regarding Samsung’s manufacture, production, and inventory of DRAM outside the United States, 

but has not yet designated that witness; 

WHEREAS, there is not sufficient time to depose this additional witness before the 

December 17, 2007, fact discovery cut-off; 

WHEREAS, Samsung has agreed to supplement its answers to Plaintiffs’ First Set of 

Interrogatories, but will be unable to do so before the December 17, 2007 fact discovery cut-off. 

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Samsung Electronic Co. and Samsung Semiconductor, 

Inc., through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the Court entering the attached Proposed 

Order. 

Stipulated by: 

Dated: December 17, 2007 

LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. 

By: _s/ James P. McCarthy

James P. McCarthy (pro hac vice) 

James M. Lockhart (pro hac vice)

80 South Eighth Street 

Minneapolis, MN 55402 

Telephone: (612) 371-3211 

Facsimile: (612) 371-3207 

Email: jmccarthy@lindquist.com 

Email: jlockhart@lindquist.com 

Counsel For Plaintiff Dram Claims 

Liquidation Trust 

 

Case 4:07-cv-01207-PJH Document 120 Filed 12/21/07 Page 2 of 4
3 

STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED] ORDER PROVIDING FOR

DEPOSITION OF SAMSUNG 30(b)(6) WITNESSES

Doc# 2472717\1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: December 17, 2007 CROWELL & MORING LLP

By: _s/ David D. Cross

 David D. Cross (pro hac vice)

 Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004-2595 

Phone: 202-624-2500 

Fax: 202-628-5116 

Daniel A. Sasse (CA Bar No. 236234) 

Theresa Lopez (CA Bar No. 205338) 

3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor 

Irvine, CA 92614-8505 

Phone: 949-263-8400 

Fax: 949-263-8414 

Counsel for Plaintiffs, Sun Microsystems, 

Inc., Unisys Corporation, Jaco Electronics, 

Inc., Edge Electronics, Inc., and All American 

Semiconductor, Inc. 

Dated: December 14, 2007 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & 

HAMPTON LLP 

By s/ Erik S. Bliss

 Erik S.Bliss 

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 

501 West Broadway 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Tel: 619/338-6500 

Fax: 619/234-3815 

Email: ebliss@sheppardmullin.com

Counsel for Defendants 

Samsung Electronic Co., and Samsung 

Semiconductor, Inc. 

Case 4:07-cv-01207-PJH Document 120 Filed 12/21/07 Page 3 of 4
4 

STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED] ORDER PROVIDING FOR

DEPOSITION OF SAMSUNG 30(b)(6) WITNESSES

Doc# 2472717\1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Court hereby ORDERS: 

1. The completion of the deposition of Samsung Electronic Co. and Samsung 

Semiconductor, Inc. (“Samsung”) by its designees, pursuant to the Notice of 30(b)(6) deposition, 

served by Plaintiff on July 27, 2007, regarding Samsung’s manufacture, production, and inventory 

of DRAM outside the United States, may occur after the December 17, 2007 fact discovery cut-off 

date. 

2. This order does not authorize the deposition of any persons or corporations 

other than Samsung, or of Samsung 30(b)(6) witnesses on topics other than regarding Samsung’s 

manufacture, production, and inventory of DRAM outside the United States, after the December 

17, 2007 fact discovery cut-off date. 

3. Samsung may serve its supplemental responses to Plaintiffs’ First Set of 

Interrogatories after the December 17, 2007 discovery cut-off, and notwithstanding anything to the 

contrary in the provisions of the Local Rules of Practice regarding the timing of motions to 

compel after discovery cut-off dates, Plaintiffs may move to compel further responses to their 

interrogatories within a reasonable time after receipt of Samsung’s supplemental responses to 

interrogatories. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________ 

 THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

12/21/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-01207-PJH Document 120 Filed 12/21/07 Page 4 of 4