Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04557/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04557-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYANT T. PRATT,

Plaintiff,

v.

B. HEDRICK; et al., 

Defendants. /

No. C 13-4557 SI (pr)

SCHEDULING ORDER

Ryant T. Pratt, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court

found that, liberally construed, the complaint stated a cognizable due process claim against three

defendants for due process violations during the disciplinary proceedings on a CDC-115 for

battery on an inmate on June 18, 2013. Defendants have moved to dismiss the action as barred

by the rule from Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641,

648 (1997). 

Plaintiff has filed a document in which he stated that his legal work was lost by prison

officials at his new prison and that he needs additional time to file his opposition to the motion.

Docket # 16. Upon due consideration, the court will GRANT plaintiff's request (Docket # 16),

order defendants to send replacement copies of the pertinent documents from this action to

plaintiff, and extend the deadline for plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss.

Docket # 16. The court now sets the following schedule: 

1. No later than January 23, 2015, defendants must mail to plaintiff a

replacement copy of their motion to dismiss and supporting papers, as well as a copy of the

complaint (Docket # 1), amended complaint (Docket # 7), and order of service (Docket # 11).

Case 3:13-cv-04557-SI Document 17 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. No later than February 27, 2015, plaintiff must file and serve on defense

counsel his opposition to the motion to dismiss. 

3. No later than March 13, 2015, defendants must file and serve their reply

brief, if any. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2015 _______________________

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-04557-SI Document 17 Filed 01/13/15 Page 2 of 2