Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03587/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03587-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTION PAPERS

Case No. C 12-03587 WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A. JAMES ISBESTER (SBN 129820)

STEVEN D. MOORE (SBN 290875)

BENJAMIN KLEINMAN-GREEN (SBN 261846)

SARA B. GIARDINA (SBN 278954)

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Tel: +1.415.576.0200 | Fax: +1.415.576.0300

jisbester@kilpatricktownsend.com

smoore@kilpatricktownsend.com

bkleinman-green@kilpatricktownsend.com

sgiardina@kilpatricktownsend.com

JORDAN TRENT JONES (SBN 166600)

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

1080 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, California 94025

Tel: +1.650.326.2400 | Fax: +1.650.326.2422

jtjones@kilpatricktownsend.com

TAYLOR LUDLAM (pro hac vice)

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

4208 Six Forks Road, Suite 1400

Raleigh, North Carolina 27609

Tel: +1.919.420.1705 | Fax: +1.919.510.6141

taludlam@kilpatricktownsend.com

MATIAS FERRARIO (pro hac vice)

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

1001 West 4th Street

Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101-2400

Tel: +1.336.607.7300 | Fax: +1.336.607.7500

mferrario@kilpatricktownsend.com

Attorneys for Defendant

MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC

THOMAS B. KENWORTHY (pro hac vice)

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

1701 Market Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

Tel: +1.215.963.5000 | Fax: +1.215.963.5001

tkenworthy@morganlewis.com

AHREN C. HSU-HOFFMAN (SBN 250469)

MICHAEL F. CARR (SBN 259911)

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

2 Palo Alto Square

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700

Palo Alto, California 94306

Tel: +1.650.843.4000 | Fax: +1.650.843.4001

djjohnson@morganlewis.com

ahsu-hoffman@morganlewis.com

mcarr@morganlewis.com

NATHAN MCCUTCHEON (pro hac vice)

BRADFORD A. CANGRO (pro hac vice)

JACOB A. SNODGRASS (pro hac vice)

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004

Tel: +1.202.739.3000 | Fax: +1.202.739.3001

nmccutcheon@morganlewis.com

bcangro@morganlewis.com

jsnodgrass@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FUJIFILM CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

FUJIFILM CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. C 12-03587 WHO

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING 

RESETTING THE HEARING FOR VARIOUS 

MOTIONS AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS 

FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW 

AND NEW TRIAL

Case 3:12-cv-03587-WHO Document 367 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTION PAPERS

Case No. C 12-03587 WHO - 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Fujifilm Corporation (“Fujifilm”) and Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC 

(“Motorola”) (collectively, the “parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby 

stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to extended response times for 

the anticipated parties’ post-trial motions pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) and 

59(a) on August 21, 2015; 

WHEREAS, on August 24, 2015, the Court ordered that the deadline for the parties to file 

oppositions to the post-trial motions pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) and 59(a) 

is October 1, 2015; 

WHEREAS, on August 24, 2015, the Court ordered that the deadline for the parties to file 

replies to such oppositions is October 15, 2015; 

WHEREAS, on September 3, 2015, Motorola filed a combined post-trial Motion for 

Judgment as a Matter of Law and New Trial pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) 

and 59(a);

WHEREAS, on September 3, 2015, Fujifilm filed a combined post-trial Motion for 

Judgment as a Matter of Law and New Trial pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) 

and 59(a);

WHEREAS, on September 3, 2015, Fujifilm filed a post-trial Motion for Prejudgment 

Interest pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e); 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a hearing date of December 9, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. 

for the Court to hear Fujifilm’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and New Trial, 

Fujifilm’s Motion for Prejudgment Interest, and Motorola’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of 

Law and New Trial; and

WHEREAS, the parties believe it appropriate to expand the time in which to file 

oppositions and replies to the above-referenced motions;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, 

through their respective attorneys of record that:

(1) Fujifilm’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and New Trial, 

Case 3:12-cv-03587-WHO Document 367 Filed 09/17/15 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTION PAPERS

Case No. C 12-03587 WHO - 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Fujifilm’s Motion for Prejudgment Interest, and Motorola’s Motion for 

Judgment as a Matter of Law and New Trial shall be heard before this 

Court on December 9, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.; 

(2) The deadline for the parties to file oppositions to the post-trial motions 

pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b), 59(a), and 59(e) is 

October 8, 2015; and

(3) The deadline to file replies to such oppositions is October 29, 2015.

Dated: September 16, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

By: /s/ A. James Isbester

A. James Isbester

Attorneys for Defendant

MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

By: /s/ Jacob A. Snodgrass

Jacob A. Snodgrass

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FUJIFILM CORPORATION

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:12-cv-03587-WHO Document 367 Filed 09/17/15 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTION PAPERS

Case No. C 12-03587 WHO - 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, A. James Isbester, attest that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 16th day of September 2015 at San Francisco, California.

A. James Isbester

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 17, 2015

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

/s/ A. James Isbester

67733874V.1

Case 3:12-cv-03587-WHO Document 367 Filed 09/17/15 Page 4 of 4