Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01824/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01824-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 5:05-CV-01824-RS

LEGAL_US_W # 57972132.1

STIPULATION RE: EXPEDITED BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MTN FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, OR 

MTN TO QUASH; MTN FOR SANCTIONS

E. JEFFREY GRUBE (SB# 167324) jeffgrube@paulhastings.com

KERRI N. HARPER (SB# 217377) kerriharper@paulhastings.com

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

55 Second Street

Twenty-Fourth Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105-3441

Telephone: (415) 856-7000

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

LESLIE F. LEVY, ESQ., SBN 104634

BOXER & GERSON, LLP

300 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 500

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 835-8870

Facsimile: (510) 835-0418

E-mail: courtmail@boxerlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GREGORY NEAL GRIMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY NEAL GRIMES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., and 

DOES 1-10;

Defendants.

CASE NO. 5:05-CV-01824-RS

STIPULATION RE: EXPEDITED 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION 

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, OR IN THE 

ALTERNATIVE, MOTION QUASH 

SUBPOENA SERVED ON 

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF 

TECHNOLOGY; MOTION FOR 

SANCTIONS

*E-FILED 1/22/08*

AND ORDER THEREON

MODIFIED BY THE COURT

Case 5:05-cv-01824-RS Document 319 Filed 01/22/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 5:05-CV-01824-RS

LEGAL_US_W # 57972132.1

- 1 -

STIPULATION RE: EXPEDITED BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MTN FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, OR 

MTN TO QUASH; MTN FOR SANCTIONS

WHEREAS, on January 4, 2008, Plaintiff Gregory Grimes served a subpoena the 

Massachusetts Institute Technology seeking production of a video entitled “When to Seed, When 

to Harvest: The Four Quads of Innovation, Growth” and dated February 20, 2002, on January 22, 

2008;

WHEREAS, UPS is moving for a protective order, or, in the alternative, to quash 

the subpoena served on MIT, and for sanctions;

WHEREAS, jury selection in this case is scheduled to begin on February 5, 2008, 

and this Court requires that motions regarding discovery be noticed on not less than 35 days 

notice pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2; 

WHEREAS, this motion would not be resolved prior to trial if the regular briefing 

schedule pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2 were followed;

WHEREAS, the parties have not previously stipulated or moved for an extension 

of time or shortening of time in this case pursuant to Civil L.R. 6;

WHEREAS, if ordered, the stipulation will have no affect on the upcoming 

deadlines in this case;

The parties agree and stipulate through their separate counsel hereby to the 

following briefing schedule for UPS’s Motion for Protective Order, or, In the Alternative, Motion 

to Quash Subpoena Served on Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and Motion for Sanctions:

1. Defendant’s motion will be filed on January 16, 2008;

2. Plaintiff’s opposition will be due on January 24, 2008;

3. Defendant’s reply brief will be due on January 28, 2008; and

4. The hearing will be set for January 30, 2008.

Dated: January 18, 2008 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

By: _____/s/ Kerri N. Harper

KERRI N. HARPER

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The motion will be submitted without oral argument.

Case 5:05-cv-01824-RS Document 319 Filed 01/22/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 5:05-CV-01824-RS

LEGAL_US_W # 57972132.1

-2-

STIPULATION RE: EXPEDITED BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MTN FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, OR 

MTN TO QUASH; MTN FOR SANCTIONS

Dated: January 18, 2008 DICKSON-ROSS LLP

By: /s/ Kathryn Dickson____

KATHRYN B. DICKSON

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GREGORY NEAL GRIMES

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: ________________ __________________________________________

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PRESIDING

1/22/08

Case 5:05-cv-01824-RS Document 319 Filed 01/22/08 Page 3 of 3