Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02466/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02466-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 05:552 Right to Privacy Act

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONFORMING TIMES TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

United States Attorney 

YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194 

Assistant United States Attorney 

501 I Street, Suite 10-100 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2760 

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

email: yoshinori.himel@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Federal Defendant Teresa McKay 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GARY TAYLOR, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING 

SERVICE (DFAS), HARRY M. WYATT III, 

DAVID S. BALDWIN, SAMI D. SAID, 

MARK GROVES, TERESA MCKAY, AND 

DOES ONE THROUGH TEN, 

Defendants. 

2:12-cv-2466-WBS-DAD 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CONFORMING TIMES TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

The parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court as 

provided for hereon, stipulate as follows: 

1. Process service upon DFAS under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(2) and upon the United 

States under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1) has previously been waived. See Order filed March 15, 2013, 

at 2. Individual-capacity defendants Lt Gen Harry M. Wyatt II, MG David S. Baldwin, and Lt 

Col Mark Groves have received process service. Individual-capacity defendant Brig Gen Sami 

D. Said, who currently is on a one-year deployment in Afghanistan, has not received process 

service. This stipulation is not an appearance by Brig Gen Said; his time to respond to the 

complaint has not yet begun to run. 

Case 2:12-cv-02466-WBS-DAD Document 33 Filed 06/17/13 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONFORMING TIMES TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2. Individual-capacity defendant Teresa McKay, Director, DFAS, received the 

summons and first amended complaint by certified mail on May 16, 2013. This conformed to 

Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 415.40, a state law process service provision that a plaintiff may use 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). Under Section 415.40, process service was effective May 28, 

2013. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(3), Director McKay's response to the complaint is due July 

29, 2013. 

3. The parties previously stipulated to conform the time for response to the complaint 

by the United States, DFAS, and the first two individual defendants to be served, to the date for 

response by the third individual defendant to be served. Order filed March 15, 2013, at 2. The 

parties have calculated that date as June 14, 2013, based on the date of service on Lt Gen Wyatt. 

4. Because it is desirable to have all responses to the complaint due on the same date, 

the parties now stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court as provided for hereon, that the 

time for response to the complaint by defendants United States, DFAS, Lt Gen Harry M. Wyatt 

II, MG David S. Baldwin, and Lt Col Mark Groves, be EXTENDED for an initial period (for Lt 

Gen Wyatt) or a further period (for the United States, DFAS, MG Baldwin, and Lt Col Groves) 

of 45 days, until the date for Director McKay's response to the complaint, that is, July 29, 2013. 

Dated: June 9, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF JAMES BROCK 

WALKER 

/s/ JWalker (as authorized on 6/9/13)

JAMES BROCK WALKER 

Dated: June 7, 2013 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

United States Attorney 

/s/ YHimel

 YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL 

Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER 

Upon the parties' stipulation, the time for response to the complaint by defendants United 

States, DFAS, Harry M. Wyatt II, David S. Baldwin, and Mark Groves, is EXTENDED until the 

Case 2:12-cv-02466-WBS-DAD Document 33 Filed 06/17/13 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULAT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

date for 

unserved

It

Dated: J

ION AND ORD

defendant T

d defendant

t is APPRO

June 17, 20

DER CONFORM

Teresa McK

t Sami D. S

OVED and S

013 

MING TIMES TO

Kay's respon

Said to respo

SO ORDER

O RESPOND TO

nse to comp

ond to the c

RED. 

O COMPLAINT

plaint, nam

complaint h

T

ely, July 29

as not yet b

, 2013. Th

egun to run

3 

e time for 

. 

Case 2:12-cv-02466-WBS-DAD Document 33 Filed 06/17/13 Page 3 of 3