Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-03162/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-03162-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

GREGORY M. FOX, State Bar No. 070876 

ARLENE C. HELFRICH, State Bar No. 096461 

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

Telephone: 415.353.0999 

Facsimile: 415.353.0990 

TERESA HIGHSMITH, State Bar No. 155262 

CITY ATTORNEY, CITY OF ALAMEDA 

City Hall 

2263 Santa Clara Avenue, Room 280 

Alameda, CA 94501 

Telephone: 510.748.4544 

Facsimile: 510.748.4691 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF ALAMEDA, GREGORY McFANN 

and GREGORY FUZ 

LAURENCE F. PADWAY, State Bar No. 89314 

Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway 

1516 Oak Street, Suite 109 

Alameda, CA 94501 

Telephone: 510.814.0680 

Facsimile: 510.814.0650 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

RITA MOHLEN and RICHARD SKRINDE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RITA MOHLEN and RICHARD SKRINDE, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY OF ALAMEDA, GREGORY McFANN, 

and GREGORY FUZ 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 03 3162 CW 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE HEARING AND BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE RE: MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 

 At the Case Management Conference on December 9, 2005 the parties agreed and the court 

Case 4:03-cv-03162-CW Document 49 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ordered plaintiffs to file their motion for partial summary judgment on the validity of the building 

codes of the City of Alameda for hearing on May 12, 2006. 

 The parties have been working diligently to prepare and exchange the foundational records for 

that motion. However, the quantity of old codes and ordinances is huge, exceeding 60,000 pages. 

The parties are still in the process of assembling and copying these documents, and estimate that this 

process will be completed at the end of August, 2006. 

 The hearing on the motion (and a further status conference) has previously been continued to 

September 22, 2006. The parties stipulate and request an order amending the briefing schedule and 

status conference as follows: 

 Moving Papers due: September 15, 2006 

 Opposition due: October 13, 2006 

 Reply due: October 27, 2006 

 Hearing: November 17, 2006 

 Status Conference: November 17, 2006 

 So stipulated. 

 

Dated: August ___, 2006 ____________________________________ 

____________________________________Laurence F. Padway 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs RITZ MOHLEN 

and RICHARD SKRINDE 

Dated: August ___ , 2006 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

 

 

 By:____________________________________ 

 Gregory M. Fox 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 CITY OF ALAMEDA, GREGORY McFANN 

 And GREGORY FUZ 

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this E-filed document. 

Case 4:03-cv-03162-CW Document 49 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: August ____, 2006 

By: /s/ 

Gregory M. Fox 

Bertrand, Fox & Elliot 

ORDER

Good cause appearing the Stipulation is So Ordered. 

 9/5 

Dated: _________________, 2006 

 /s/ CLAUDIA WILKEN 

 

 Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 4:03-cv-03162-CW Document 49 Filed 09/05/06 Page 3 of 3