Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06583/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06583-47/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

___________________________________________________________

ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI, #068525

LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI

1233 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 102

Fresno, California 93711

Telephone: (559) 221-0200

Facsimile: (559) 221-7997

Attorneys for the Plaintiffs,

Terry D. Hamilton, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

*****

Terry D. Hamilton; Sharon M. Hamilton;

Estates In Eagle Ridge, LLLP, a Colorado

Limited Liability Limited Partnership, James

C. Bateman Petroleum Services, dba Semco,

a California Corporation; and Enviro-Safe,

Inc., a California Corporation,

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Henry W. Willms, Individually; Dolly G.

Willms, Individually; Henry W. Willms and

Dolly G. Willms as co-trustees of the Trust

Agreement dated September 26, 1986,

between Henry W. Willms and Dolly G.

Willms, Trustors; Dolly Willms, Trustee of

the Trust Agreement dated December 10,

1982, between Henry W. Willms and Dolly

G. Willms, Trustors; Victor R. McClune, an

individual; Lend-Teck Financial, Inc., a

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV F 02 6583 AWI SMS

EX PARTE REQUEST FOR

ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE

MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'

MOTION TO ENFORCE STIPULATION

AND SANCTIONS, SIGNED BY

JUDGE ANTHONY W. ISHII ON

03/02/2007, PURSUANT TO RULE 6(B)

OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

ORDER

Case 1:02-cv-06583-AWI-SMS Document 567 Filed 03/16/07 Page 1 of 3
California Corporation; Catherine A. Locke,

an individual; Redwood Trust Deed Services,

Inc., a California Corporation; and Susan

Willms Thurston, Beneficiary of 1982

Willms Trust along with Catherine A. Locke;

and THE WILLMS ENTERPRISE, an

informal entity.

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

/////

PLAINTIFFS, Terry D. Hamilton, et al., hereby requests an extension of time of 14 days

in which to file a Motion for Reconsideration on the Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to

Enforce Stipulation and Sanctions signed by Judge Anthony W. Ishii on March 2, 2007 and filed

by this Court on March 6, 2007. Said request is based on Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure (FRCP) and the Declaration of Anthony P. Capozzi.

Rule 6(b) of the FRCP states, in pertinent part:

When by these rules or by a notice given thereunder or by

order of court an act is required or allowed to be done at or within

a specified time, the court for cause shown may at any time in its

discretion (1) with or without motion or notice order the period

enlarged if request therefore is made before the expiration of the

period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order.

Declaration of Anthony P. Capozzi

I, Anthony P. Capozzi, having first-hand knowledge of the following information, do

hereby declare:

1. I am an attorney-at-law duly licensed to practice in the State of California and before

this Court.

2. I am an attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above entitled action. 

3. On January 12, 2007, I filed a Motion to Withdraw from this case. That Motion is

scheduled to be heard by this Court on April 2, 2007.

Case 1:02-cv-06583-AWI-SMS Document 567 Filed 03/16/07 Page 2 of 3
4. The Plaintiffs were also represented by David Gilmore of Gilmore, Wood, Vinnard

& Magness. Mr. Gilmore also filed a Motion to Withdraw, which was granted on

March 2, 2007.

5. Mr. Hamilton’s mother passed away last week and Mr. Hamilton has been tending

to the arrangements.

6. In addition, it is my understanding that Mr. Hamilton has been diligently

attempting to retain other counsel, as I have had a conversation with at least one

other attorney who is considering representing Mr. Hamilton in this matter.

7. The Defendants would not be prejudiced in that this is a minimal extension of time.

8. Plaintiffs, if not given this additional time in which to their Motion for

Reconsideration, will be severely prejudiced.

9. I further affirm under penalty of perjury, pursuant to the laws of the United States,

that the information contained in this declaration is true and correct to the best of

my knowledge as executed this day in Fresno, California.

Accordingly, it is requested that Plaintiffs be given a 14-day extension of time in

which to their Motion for Reconsideration.

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: March 15, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI

/s/ Anthony P. Capozzi

ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI

Attorney for Plaintiffs

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiffs shall be granted an additional 14 days

in which to file the Motion for Reconsideration on the Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to

Enforce Stipulation and Sanctions signed by Judge Anthony W. Ishii on March 2, 2007 and filed

by this Court on March 6, 2007. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration shall now be filed

with this Court no later than March 20, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06583-AWI-SMS Document 567 Filed 03/16/07 Page 3 of 3