Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02048/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02048-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

It has come to the Court’s attention that Plaintiff’s counsel has made several ex parte

attempts to communicate with the Court about the lack of his opposition. Not only is that an

improper method for communicating with the Court, it does not help Plaintiff because there

is no information in the record on Plaintiff’s position which the Court may review in

adjudicating Defendants’ motion. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY TURNER II,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SCHOOL OF NURSING, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 05-02048 JSW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On July 24, 2006, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment which is currently

set to be heard on September 15, 2006. On July 26, 2006, the Court issued an order setting a

briefing schedule on Defendants’ motion directing Plaintiff to file any opposition by no later

than August 11, 2006. To date, Plaintiff has not filed any opposition or any request for

extension of time to oppose Defendants’ motion. On August 14, 2006, Defendants filed a reply

brief highlighting Plaintiff’s failure to oppose the pending motion for summary judgment and

requesting that their motion be granted without a hearing. 

Therefore, the Court issues this Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) why Defendants’ motion

for summary judgment should not be granted as unopposed. Plaintiff shall file a response to this

OSC by no later than 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, September 13, 2006.1 If Plaintiff intends to

provide the Court with good cause for his delay and requests an extension to oppose

Case 3:05-cv-02048-JSW Document 41 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff is directed to do so in writing filed with

the Court in his response to this OSC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 8, 2006 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-02048-JSW Document 41 Filed 09/08/06 Page 2 of 2