Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04850/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04850-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2004\4850\order re surreply.wpd

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARC DAYS and BENJAMIN HOLL,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

LARRY BISHOP, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 04-04850 CRB

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Adjudication against

defendant Larry Bishop. Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief concentrates almost exclusively on argument

pursuant to California Civil Code section 3439 in support of their claim under California’s

Unfair Competition Law. This statute, however, was not even mentioned in plaintiffs’ initial

Memorandum in support of their Motion, thereby depriving defendant of an opportunity to

respond appropriately. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS defendant to address

plaintiffs’ Reply in a Sur-Reply of no more than 10 pages by Monday, July 24. Argument

scheduled for July 21 is vacated and rescheduled for Friday, August 4, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 17, 2006

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-04850-CRB Document 50 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2004\4850\order re surreply.wpd 2

Case 3:04-cv-04850-CRB Document 50 Filed 07/17/06 Page 2 of 2