Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02277/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02277-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY GIRALDES, No. CIV S-06-2277-MCE-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

ROCHE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendants’ request for an order re-setting the

deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

26(a)(2)(C). That rule requires that expert disclosures be made at least 90 days prior to the date

set for trial. However, because the court has vacated the trial date and has not set a new trial date

in this matter, there is no need for the order sought by defendants. Once a new trial date is set, if

at all, following resolution of defendants’ motion for summary judgment, expert disclosures will

be due by the time specified in the rule. 

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:06-cv-02277-MCE -CMK Document 40 Filed 11/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ motion for extension

of the expert discovery deadline is denied as unnecessary.

DATED: November 1, 2007

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-02277-MCE -CMK Document 40 Filed 11/02/07 Page 2 of 2