Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01092/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01092-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONATHAN MILES,

Plaintiff,

 v.

U.S. GOVERNMENT, et al.

Defendants.

 /

No. C 07-01092 JSW

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE TO

FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

On February 22, 2007, Plaintiff filed his complaint in this action. On May 5, 2007, the

Honorable Martin J. Jenkins dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint, with leave to amend, and denied

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended

complaint within sixty days of the Order. 

Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Instead, on August 6, 2007, Plaintiff filed a

notice of appeal. On September 14, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth

Circuit dismissed Plaintiff’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and the mandate issued on

November 9, 2007. 

In the interim, on October 2, 2007, Plaintiff sent a letter requesting that this case be sent

“to Houston Texas Federal Clerks Office to be considered by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in

New Orleans.” (See Docket 11.) On December 13, 2007, Plaintiff sent a letter inquiring as to

the status of his case, advised the Court of his new address, and stated “is anything required on

my part?” (Docket No. 14.)

Case 3:07-cv-01092-JSW Document 16 Filed 02/22/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On February 15, 2008, this matter was reassigned to the undersigned. Because the Ninth

Circuit has resolved Plaintiff’s appeal, this Court again has jurisdiction over the matter. If

Plaintiff intends to pursue this matter, he is HEREBY ORDERED to file an amended complaint

setting forth a cognizable legal claim by no later than March 28, 2008. If Plaintiff fails to

comply with this Order, he is HEREBY ADVISED that his failure to comply with the Order

shall result in a dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Court

also advises Plaintiff that a Handbook for Pro Se Litigants, which contains helpful information

about proceeding without an attorney, is available through the Court’s website or in the Clerk’s

office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 22, 2008 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-01092-JSW Document 16 Filed 02/22/08 Page 2 of 2