Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-06538/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-06538-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACK ALLEN WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:01-cv-06538-LJO-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER VACATING PARTIES’ CROSSMOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FROM COURT’S CALENDAR

(Docs. 139 and 148)

Plaintiff Jack Allen Wilson (“plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 6, 2007,

plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment, and on May 7, 2007, defendants filed an opposition

and a cross-motion for summary judgment. On June 8, 2007, plaintiff filed a motion seeking a

ninety-day extension of time to file an opposition to defendants’ cross-motion on the ground that he

has been diagnosed with lung cancer and will be undergoing chemotherapy. Defendants did not file

a response, and on July 11, 2007, the Court granted plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time.

In light of 28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), the CivilJustice Reform Act, the parties’ cross-motions for

summary judgment are HEREBY DEEMED VACATED from the Court’s calendar until such time

///

///

///

///

Case 1:01-cv-06538-LJO -GSA Document 155 Filed 07/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

as plaintiff files his opposition and either defendants file a reply or the motion is submitted pursuant

to Local Rule 78-230(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 12, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:01-cv-06538-LJO -GSA Document 155 Filed 07/12/07 Page 2 of 2