Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01429/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01429-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS No. C 07 1429 JSW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MICHAEL B. ESHELMAN, D.D.S.; PETER F. 

SILCHER, D.D.S.; and LORI I. SILCHER, 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

ORTHOCLEAR HOLDINGS, INC. a British 

Virgin Islands Company; ORTHOCLEAR, 

INC., a Delaware Corporation; MUHAMMAD 

ZIAULLAH CHISHTI, an individual; 

HUAFENG “CHARLES” WEN, an individual; 

PETER RIEPENHAUSEN, an individual; 

ARTHUR T. TAYLOR, an individual; 

SAIYED ATIQ RAZA, an individual; 

CHRISTOPHER KAWAJA, an individual; 

PATRICIA HUMELL SEIFERT, an individual; 

JOSEPH BREELAND, an individual; 

MUDASSAR RATHORE, an individual; 

PAUL BADAWI, an individual; 3i 

TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS III, LP, a 

Limited Partnership; and DOES 1 through 25, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. C 07 1429 JSW 

Action Filed: March 12, 2007 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Case 3:07-cv-01429-JSW Document 45 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-01429-JSW Document 46 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 4
-1- 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS No. C 07 1429 JSW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3.5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

 Non-Binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

 √ - Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ________________ 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 √ - the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

 referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) 

 other requested deadline ________________________________________ 

Concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation has been obtained by the other signatories, except for 

Defendants Chishti, Wen, Riepenhausen, Taylor, Raza, Seifert, Breeland, and Rathore, whose 

approval is pending. 

DATED: July 20, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF ALAN W. SPARER 

By: /s/ 

ALAN W. SPARER 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

MICHAEL B. ESHELMAN, D.D.S.; PETER F. 

SILCHER, D.D.S.; and LORI I. SILCHER 

Case 3:07-cv-01429-JSW Document 45 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-01429-JSW Document 46 Filed 07/23/07 Page 2 of 4
-2- 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS No. C 07 1429 JSW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: July 20, 2007 GENERAL COUNSEL OF OCUMENTA, INC. 

By: /s/ 

PAT COSTELLO 

Attorney for OCUMENTA, INC. AND 

OCUMENTA HOLDINGS, INC. (F/K/A 

ORTHOCLEAR, INC. AND ORTHOCLEAR 

HOLDINGS, INC. respectively), and as an agent for 

Defendants other than KAWAJA, BADAWI and 3i 

DATED: July 20, 2007 ROPES & GRAY LLP 

By: /s/ 

PETER L. WELSH 

Attorneys for Defendants 3I TECHNOLOGY 

PARTNERS III, LP and PAUL BADAWI 

DATED: July 20, 2007 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY 

By: /s/ 

 JENNIFER L. KLEM 

Attorneys for Defendant CHRISTOPHER 

KAWAJA 

Case 3:07-cv-01429-JSW Document 45 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 3 of 4 Case 3:07-cv-01429-JSW Document 46 Filed 07/23/07 Page 3 of 4
-3- 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS No. C 07 1429 JSW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 

 Non-binding Arbitration 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 

 Mediation 

 Private ADR 

Deadline for ADR session 

 90 days from the date of this order. 

 other 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: _________________ __________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:07-cv-01429-JSW Document 45 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 4 of 4

July 23, 2007 DISTRICT

Case 3:07-cv-01429-JSW Document 46 Filed 07/23/07 Page 4 of 4