Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-mc-00158/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-mc-00158-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 625
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

APPROXIMATELY $17,980.00 IN U.S. 

CURRENCY, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-MC-0158 KJM KJN 

ORDER 

The parties have stipulated to extend time for filing a complaint for forfeiture 

against the defendant currency. ECF No. 7. 

Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint 

for forfeiture against the defendant currency alleging that the defendant currency is subject to 

forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative forfeiture 

proceedings, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause. United States v. Real Prop. 

Located at 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, CA, 545 F.3d 1134, 1141 (9th Cir. 2008). In United 

States v. Real Prop., the court allowed the parties three extensions to file the complaint for 

forfeiture. Id. at 1147. 

Case 2:15-mc-00158-KJM-KJN Document 8 Filed 05/05/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

This is the parties’ fourth stipulation to extend the deadline. While the court 

approves the stipulation, a future stipulated extension must be accompanied by a clear showing of 

good cause supported by a specific statement of reasons. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 5, 2016. 

Case 2:15-mc-00158-KJM-KJN Document 8 Filed 05/05/16 Page 2 of 2