Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00457/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00457-39/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:13-cv-00457 JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO APPROVE 

BOND AND TO STAY JUDGMENT

COOLEY LLP

REUBEN H. CHEN (SBN 228725)

rchen@cooley.com

KYLE D. CHEN (SBN 239501)

kyle.chen@cooley.com

3175 Hanover Street

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130

Telephone: (650) 843-5000

Facsimile: (650) 849-7400

Attorneys for Defendant

CMI USA, Inc.

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

ROBERT F. MCCAULEY (SBN 162056) 

robert.mccauley@finnegan.com 

ERIK R. PUKNYS (SBN 190926) 

erik.puknys@finnegan.com 

JEFFREY D. SMYTH (SBN 280665) 

jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Tel: (650) 849-6600 

Fax: (650) 849-6666 

ARPITA BHATTACHARYYA

(pro hac vice) 

arpita.bhattacharyya@finnegan.com 

Two Seaport Lane, 6th Floor 

Boston, MA 02210-2001 

Telephone: (617) 646-1600 

Facsimile: (617) 646-1666 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ASETEK DANMARK A/S 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ASETEK DANMARK A/S,

Plaintiff,

v.

CMI USA., INC. fka COOLER MASTER 

USA, INC.,

 Defendant.

Case No. 3:13-cv-00457 JST

JOINT STIPULATION TO APPROVE 

BOND AND TO STAY EXECUTION OF 

JUDGMENT THROUGH APPEAL

PURSUANT TO FRCP 62; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Complaint Filed: January 31, 2013

Trial Date: December 2, 2014

Judge: Jon S. Tigar

Case 3:13-cv-00457-JST Document 341 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:13-cv-00457 JST -1- JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO APPROVE 

BOND AND TO STAY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Asetek Danmark A/S (“Asetek”) and Defendant CMI USA, Inc. (“CMI”) 

(collectively the “Parties”) respectfully submit this joint stipulation pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 62(d) (“Rule 62(d)”) for entry of an order by this Court: (1) approving the 

supersedeas bond in the amount of $607,500.00 submitted herewith in combination with a

supplemental cash deposit in the amount of $37,000 as the “supersedeas bond” provided in Rule 

62(d), and (2) staying execution of the Court’s “Revised Judgment” entered on June 2, 2015 (Dkt. 

No. 261) and the amended judgment to be entered pursuant to the Court’s September 22, 2015 

Order Denying Defendant’s Post-Trial Motions; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s 

Post-Trial Motions (Dkt. No. 322, hereinafter the “Order”) (collectively the “Judgment”), pending 

CMI’s appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Said bond in the 

amount of $607,500.00 is attached as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Kyle Chen in Support of the 

Parties’ Stipulation. The parties have met and conferred and stipulate that the cash deposit of 

$37,000 will be submitted to the Court to hold in escrow pending the appeal. CMI will submit a 

cashier’s check or equivalent form of payment to the Court within ten (10) days of the Court’s 

expected order approving this joint stipulation. As directed on the Court’s website, the check will 

be made payable to “Clerk, U.S. District Court,” will include reference to the case number, and 

will be delivered or mailed to “U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue., San Francisco, CA 

94102,” along with a copy of the expected order approving this stipulation.

CMI filed a Notice of Appeal on September 30, 2015 (Dkt. No. 323) within the time limit 

prescribed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4 after the Order. Rule 62(d) states: “[i]f an 

appeal is taken, the appellant may obtain a stay by supersedeas bond” and “[t]he stay takes effect 

when the court approves the bond.”1

 The Parties hereby stipulate that the bond in the amount of 

$607,500.00 in combination with the supplemental cash deposit of $37,000 to be deposited with 

the Court (collectively the “Plaintiff’s Security”) satisfies and has the same legal effect as the 

 1 Rule 62(d) provides that enforcement of a judgment may be stayed as a matter of right pending 

appeal, provided a supersedeas bond is posted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d); Fed. Prescription Serv., 

Inc. v. Am. Pharm. Ass’n, 636 F.2d 755, 760-61 (D.C. Cir. 1980); 12-62 Moore’s Federal 

Practice – Civil § 62.03 (2015).

Case 3:13-cv-00457-JST Document 341 Filed 10/21/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:13-cv-00457 JST -2- JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO APPROVE BOND AND TO 

STAY JUDGMENT

“supersedeas bond” requirement under Rule 62(d). The Parties thus respectfully request that this 

Court approve the Plaintiff’s Security as the “supersedeas bond” under Rule 62(d) and stay 

execution of the Judgment pending CMI’s appeal. Asetek shall not be permitted to collect on the

Plaintiff’s Security absent further order from this Court, and the Plaintiff’s Security will remain in 

place until released by order of this Court. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

By his signature below, counsel for CMI attests that counsel for Asetek concurs in the 

filing of this document.

Dated: October 20, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

COOLEY LLP

REUBEN H. CHEN 

KYLE D. CHEN 

BY: /s/ Kyle D. Chen Kyle D. Chen (SBN 239501)

Attorneys for Defendant

CMI USA, INC.

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

BY: /s/ Robert F. McCauley _____

Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff ASETEK 

DANMARK A/S

Case 3:13-cv-00457-JST Document 341 Filed 10/21/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:13-cv-00457 JST -3- JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO APPROVE BOND AND TO 

STAY JUDGMENT

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Parties’ joint stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________, 2015 ________________________________________ 

The Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

United States District Judge 

Northern District of California

118282431

October 21

Case 3:13-cv-00457-JST Document 341 Filed 10/21/15 Page 4 of 4