Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01013/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01013-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on Plaintiff on January 5, 2007, as 1

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - No longer at institution. However, Plaintiff

has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully

effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOAQUIN YBARRA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LAMARQUE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-01013-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 10)

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT/

ACTION

Joaquin Ybarra (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding

pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On December 18, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and Recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and

which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:05-cv-01013-SMM Document 14 Filed 02/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 18,

2006, are ADOPTED in full; and,

2. The Complaint, and therefore this action, is DISMISSED

based on Plaintiff’s failure to obey the Court’s Order of

November 2, 2006, and because the Complaint fails to state a

claim upon which relief can be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 7, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01013-SMM Document 14 Filed 02/08/07 Page 2 of 2