Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04826/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04826-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

COALITION FOR ICANN

TRANSPARENCY,

Plaintiff,

v.

VERISIGN, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 05-4826 RMW PVT

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’

PROPOSED FORM OF PROTECTIVE

ORDER

On February 23, 2006, this court issued an order that, among other things, directed the parties

to submit either a stipulated form of protective order, or else their respective proposals for a

protective order, within two weeks of that order. On March 9, 2006, Defendants VeriSign, Inc.

(“VeriSign”) and Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”) submitted a

proposed form of protective order. Plaintiff Coalition for ICANN Transparency (“CFIT”) has not

submitted any proposed form of protective order. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court will issue a protective order in the form proposed

by VeriSign and ICANN, except that the form of order, including Exhibit A thereto, must be revised

to omit all references to any stipulation of the parties to the order. Defendants shall submit the

revised form of order no later than March 31, 2006. The Defendants’ proposed form of order,

revised as required herein, is deemed effective immediately and shall govern the parties’ handling of

confidential information produced during this litigation. 

Dated: 3/16/06

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:05-cv-04826-RMW Document 140 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 1