Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05462/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05462-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRY JEROME CONERLY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

GAIL LEWIS, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:02-cv-05462-0WW-TAG HC

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN

WHICH TO FILE OBJECTIONS 

(Doc. 31)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 15, 2006, the court issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the

instant petition be denied on the merits. (Doc. 28). The Report and Recommendation was served on

all parties and gave the parties 30 days from the date of service within which to file objections. (Id.). 

On September 13, 2006, petitioner filed a motion to enlarge the time within which he could

file objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 29). On September 29, 2006, the court

granted petitioner’s motion, extending the time until November 3, 2006. (Doc. 30). On October 27,

2006, petitioner filed the instant second request for extension of time, contending that the individual

who is assisting him with his objections has been busy and additional time is required to prepare the

objections. (Doc. 31). 

///

///

Case 1:02-cv-05462-OWW -TAG Document 32 Filed 11/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

Accordingly, GOOD CAUSE appearing therefore, the court HEREBY ORDERS the

petitioner’s Request for Enlargement of Time (Doc. 31), is GRANTED. Petitioner has fifteen (15)

days from the date of service of this order to file his objections to the Report and Recommendation. 

(Doc. 28). No further extensions of time will be granted for filing objections absent a showing of

extraordinary circumstances.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 7, 2006 /s/ Theresa A. Goldner 

j6eb3d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:02-cv-05462-OWW -TAG Document 32 Filed 11/08/06 Page 2 of 2