Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-04878/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-04878-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

CASE NO. 4:08-CV-4878 CW (EDL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROPOUND ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WANDA GREENWOOD, LADELLE HATFIELD, 

and DEBORAH MCCLEESE, on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMPUCREDIT CORPORATION; COLUMBUS 

BANK AND TRUST, jointly and individually,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:08-cv-4878 CW (EDL)

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROPOUND 

ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES

Plaintiff Deborah McCleese’s motion for leave to propound additional interrogatories came on for 

hearing on August 3, 2010. Appearances were as stated in the record. For the reasons stated during the 

hearing, the Court hereby Orders that Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN 

PART, as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve proposed Interrogatory Nos. 1, 2, and 3 on Defendant 

CompuCredit Corporation is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve proposed Interrogatory No. 4 on CompuCredit is 

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, based on CompuCredit’s agreement to produce transaction histories 

for all class members in an electronic, searchable format to Plaintiff. CompuCredit shall produce the 

transaction histories to Plaintiff’s counsel by August 19, 2010. To the extent necessary, CompuCredit 

shall cooperate with Plaintiffs and/or their expert in order to accomplish the transfer of the transaction 

histories.

///

///

Case 4:08-cv-04878-CW Document 305 Filed 08/06/10 Page 1 of 3 Case4:08-cv-04878-CW Document304 Filed08/05/10 Page1 of 3
CASE NO. 4:08-CV-4878 CW (EDL) 1

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROPOUND ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve proposed Interrogatory No. 5 on CompuCredit is 

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE, based on CompuCredit’s 

agreement to produce transaction histories for all class members to Plaintiff. Plaintiff may rewrite 

proposed Interrogatory No. 5, with reference to the deposition of John Hogan, CompuCredit’s 

representative, to clarify the nature of the requested information.

4. CompuCredit is Ordered to provide responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatory Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 

4 (it being agreed that Interrogatory No. 4 can be addressed by CompuCredit providing transaction 

histories as set forth in Paragraph 2) by August 24, 2010. Plaintiff may review CompuCredit’s responses 

to the Interrogatories and, to the extent necessary, and only after meeting and conferring regarding any 

issues, may file a motion to compel. To the extent any such motion shall be filed, it shall be filed by 

September 14, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte

U.S. District Court, Northern District of California 

Case4:08-cv-04878-CW Document304 Filed08/05/10 Page2 of 3

August 6, 2010

Case 4:08-cv-04878-CW Document 305 Filed 08/06/10 Page 2 of 3
CASE NO. 4:08-CV-4878 CW (EDL)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Linda S. Fang, certify that on August 5, 2010, the foregoing document entitled:

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO PROPOUND ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES

was filed electronically in the Court’s ECF; thereby upon completion the ECF system automatically 

generated a “Notice of Electronic Filing” (“NEF”) as service through CM/ECF to registered e-mail 

addresses of parties of record in the case, in particular on the following:

John Edward Smith David L. Hartsell

js@gslaw.org dhartsell@mcguirewoods.com

Laurie Adrea Traktman Susan L. Germaise

lat@gslaw.org sgermaise@mcguirewoods.com

Adrian John Barnes James R. McGuire

abarnes@gslaw.org jmcguire@mofo.com

Linda S. Fang Tim A. O’Brien

lfang@gslaw.org tobrien@mofo.com

Stephanie Nicole Johnson

sjohnson@gslaw.org

Gregory Hascal Hawley

ghawley@waadlaw.com

U. W. Clemon

uwclemon@waadlaw.com

Christopher Joseph Nicholson

cnicholson@waadlaw.com

Rebecca Garity DePalma

rdepalma@whitearnolddowd.com

Steven Anthony Martino

stevemartino@taylormartino.com

William Lloyd Copeland

lloyd@taylormartino.com

Kasie Moore Braswell

kasie@taylormartino.com

Richard R. Rosenthal

rosenthallaw@bellsouth.net

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is 

true and correct. Executed on August 5, 2010, at Los Angeles, California.

Linda S. Fang

s/ Linda S. Fang 

Case 4:08-cv-04878-CW Document 305 Filed 08/06/10 Page 3 of 3 Case4:08-cv-04878-CW Document304 Filed08/05/10 Page3 of 3