Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05429/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-05429-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GENENTECH, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INSMED INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C04-5429 CW (EMC) 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE

UNDER SEAL THE MOTION TO

COMPEL DOCUMENTS FOR IN

CAMERA REVIEW

(Docket no. 262)

 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, Defendants moved the Court to issue an order authorizing

the sealing of their Motion to Compel Documents for In Camera Review and for Production, the

Supporting Declaration of Larry L. Shatzer, and the exhibits thereto, as containing information

designated by Plaintiff Genentech as confidential. Plaintiff did not file a declaration establishing

that the designated information is sealable within the five-day period prescribed by Local Rule 79-

5(d). Therefore, Defendants’ request for a sealing order is DENIED. The proposed filings will be

made part of the public record. As this case is designated for the Court’s Electronic Case File

program, the documents must be filed electronically on the Court’s ECF website.

Defendants shall electronically file their Motion to Compel and the supporting Shatzer

declaration with exhibits. Defendants’ Motion shall be deemed filed as of the date that it was

submitted with the request for the sealing order, namely, January 4, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2006 _____________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:04-cv-05429-CW Document 269 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 1