Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00885/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00885-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANA BIOCINI,

Petitioner,

 v.

MICHAEL MUKASEY, in his official capacity as

Attorney General of the United States, et al., 

Respondents. /

No. C 08-885 SI

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner Ana Biocini has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2241. Petitioner states that she is currently detained in immigration custody, and that she has exhausted

her administrative remedies. Petitioner alleges that she has been detained for almost two years without

a hearing under the general immigration detention statutes, and that her continued detention violates the

United States Constitution, federal statutes, and international law.

The Court concludes that the petition warrants a response from respondents. Respondents must

file and serve upon petitioner, on or before March 21, 2008, an answer showing cause why a writ of

habeas corpus should not be issued. Respondents must file with the answer a copy of all portions of the

administrative proceedings that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented in the petition.

If petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, she must do so by filing a traverse with the Court and

serving it on respondents on or before April 11, 2008. If the parties wish to modify this schedule, they

may do so by joint stipulation. If, after review of the parties’ answer and traverse, the Court determines

Case 3:08-cv-00885-SI Document 8 Filed 02/12/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

that oral argument is necessary, the Court shall so notify the parties. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2008 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00885-SI Document 8 Filed 02/12/08 Page 2 of 2