Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01439/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01439-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT NELSON,

Petitioner,

v.

UNKNOWN,

Respondent.

No. 2:14-cv-1439 DAD P

ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed April 24, 2015, the court granted petitioner a sixty-day extension of time to 

file a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The sixty day period has now expired, and petitioner has 

not filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to 

randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that 

Case 2:14-cv-01439-JAM-DAD Document 11 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

In any objections he elects to file, petitioner may address whether a certificate of 

appealability should issue in the event he files an appeal of the judgment in this case. See Rule 

11, Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (the district court must issue or deny a 

certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant).

Dated: June 30, 2015

DAD:9

nels1439.fta

Case 2:14-cv-01439-JAM-DAD Document 11 Filed 06/30/15 Page 2 of 2