Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03965/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03965-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

-1- CASE NO. 05-03965 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

BRUCE D. CELEBREZZE Bar No. 102181

DENNIS G. ROLSTAD Bar No. 150006

MICHELLE Y. MCISAAC Bar No. 215294

One Market Plaza

Steuart Tower, 8th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 781-7900

Facsimile: (415) 781-2635

dennis.rolstad@sdma.com

Attorneys for Defendants

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE 

COMPANY and C&H SALARIED EMPLOYEES 

BENEFIT PLAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN plaintiff Daniel Hemenez

and defendants Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and C&H Salaried Employees 

Benefit Plan, by and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the parties have 

resolved this matter in its entirety, and that the parties to date have complied with the written 

settlement agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED that this entire action, 

DANIEL HEMENEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT 

INSURANCE CO., HARTFORD LIFE 

AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. 

GROUP INSURANCE POLICY, C&H 

SUGAR COMPANY, INC., and C&H 

SALARIED EMPLOYEES BENEFIT 

PLAN,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 05-03965 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE 

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 

Case 3:05-cv-03965-WHA Document 29 Filed 05/01/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cv-03965-WHA Document 30 Filed 05/08/06 Page 1 of 2
-2- CASE NO. 05-03965 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

including the complaint and any counter-claim on file herein, shall be dismissed with prejudice, 

each party to bear his or its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

DATED: April 11, 2006 THE BRANDI LAW FIRM 

By: s/Brian J. Malloy

BRIAN J. MALLOY

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DANIEL HEMENEZ

DATED: May 1, 2006 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

By: s/Dennis G. Rolstad

DENNIS G. ROLSTAD

MICHELLE Y. MCISAAC 

Attorneys for Defendants

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT 

INSURANCE COMPANY and C&H SALARIED 

EMPLOYEES BENEFIT PLAN

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 

JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:05-cv-03965-WHA Document 29 Filed 05/01/2006 Page 2 of 2

May 8, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:05-cv-03965-WHA Document 30 Filed 05/08/06 Page 2 of 2