Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00935/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00935-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Demond Wilson, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Joe W. Booker, Jr., Warden, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-935-PHX-ROS (DKD)

ORDER

On March 31, 2006, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. 1)

On August 29, 2006, Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan issued a Report and

Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the petition be denied and dismissed with

prejudice. (Doc. 14) No objections were filed by either party.

The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is "clear that the

district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if

objection is made, but not otherwise." United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1126 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, 'but not otherwise."'). District

courts are not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject

Case 2:06-cv-00935-ROS Document 15 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). No objection having been

made, the Court will adopt the R&R in full. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is ADOPTED and

this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

DATED this 18th day of September, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00935-ROS Document 15 Filed 09/18/06 Page 2 of 2