Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-01318/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-01318-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Donald Kilmer

Attorney at Law

1645 Willow St.

Suite 150

San Jose, CA 95125

Vc: 408/264-8489

Fx: 408/264-8487

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Donald E. J. Kilmer, Jr. [SBN: 179986]

LAW OFFICES OF DONALD KILMER

1645 Willow Street, Suite 150

San Jose, California 95125

Voice: (408) 264-8489

Fax: (408) 264-8487

E-Mail: Don@DKLawOffice.com

Jason A. Davis [SBN: 224250]

Davis & Associates

27281 Las Ramblas, Suite 200

Mission Viejo, CA 92691

Voice: (949) 310-0817

Fax: (949) 288-6894

E-Mail: Jason@CalGunLawyers.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case No.: CV 11 01318 - EMC

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING AUGUST 25, 2016

CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

The parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as

follows: 

1. On January 14, 2013, the Court issued an order staying this case until the

Ninth Circuit ruled on Richards v. Prieto (Yolo County), Case No.: 11-

16255 and Peruta v. County of San Diego, Case No.: 10-56971. 

TOM SCOCCA, MADISON

SOCIETY, INC., and THE

CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

SHERIFF LAURIE SMITH (In her

individual and official capacity.),

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, and

DOES 1 to 20, 

Defendants.

Stipulation: Conitinue CMC Page 1 of 2 Scocca v. Smith

Case 3:11-cv-01318-EMC Document 102 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 2
Donald Kilmer

Attorney at Law

1645 Willow St.

Suite 150

San Jose, CA 95125

Vc: 408/264-8489

Fx: 408/264-8487

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. The Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in that matter on June 9, 2016. 

3. Pursuant to prior orders, the Plaintiffs filed a notice of that disposition on

June 15, 2016. (Doc #100) 

4. This matter is on for Case Management Conference on August 25, 2016 at

10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, of the San Francisco Courthouse. 

5. On June 23, 2016, the Appellants in Richards and Peruta, filed petitions for

Full Court en banc. 

6. On June 24, 2016, the Ninth Circuit ordered the Appellees and Intervenors to

file a response to those petitions. 

7. As of the date of this stipulation, the petitions in Richards and Peruta are

still pending. 

8. The parties have met and conferred and agree that the Court should continue

the Case Management Conference while Richards and Peruta remain active

in the Ninth Circuit. 

9. The plaintiffs have the defendants’ consent to file this stipulation and

proposed order. Respectfully Submitted on July 28, 2016, 

 /s/ /s/ 

Melissa Kiniyalocts, Donald Kilmer 

Counsel for Defendants Counsel for Plaintiffs

ORDER

The August 25, 2016 Case Management Conference is continued to:

__________ at ______. Joint Case Management Statement will be due: __________.

Plaintiffs are directed to file notice with this Court within 5 court-days of the Ninth

Circuit issuing its (full court) en banc disposition in Richards v. Prieto, Case No.:

11-16255 and Peruta v. County of San Diego, Case No.: 10-56971. 

Date: _______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Stipulation: Conitinue CMC Page 2 of 2 Scocca v. Smith

Nov. 10, 2016 10:30 am Nov. 3, 2016 8/4/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:11-cv-01318-EMC Document 102 Filed 08/04/16 Page 2 of 2