Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00271/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-00271-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kim E. Miller (178370) 

Melissa R. Clark, pro hac vice 

KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC 

500 5th Avenue, Suite 1810 

New York, NY 10110 

Telephone: (212) 696-3730 

Facsimile: (504) 455-1498 

Lewis S. Kahn, pro hac vice 

Paul S. Balanon, pro hac vice 

Sarah C. Boone, pro hac vice 

KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC 

650 Poydras Street, Suite 2150 

New Orleans, LA 70130 

Telephone: (504) 455-1400 

Facsimile: (504) 455-1498 

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs 

and the Class 

Reed R. Kathrein (139304) 

Peter E. Borkon (212596) 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 

Berkeley, CA 94710 

Telephone: (510) 725-3000 

Facsimile: (510) 725-3001 

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs 

and the Class 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re SHORETEL, INC. SECURITIES 

LITIGATION 

Case No. C-08-00271-CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS 

 

Case 3:08-cv-00271-CRB Document 97 Filed 01/13/10 Page 1 of 5
-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiffs Loren Swanson and Art Landesman (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) 

and ShoreTel, Inc.; John W. Combs, Michael E. Healy, Edwin J. Basart, Mark F. Bregman, Gary 

J. Daichendt, Thomas Van Overbeek, Kenneth D. Denman, Charles D. Kissner, and Edward 

Thompson; and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) have met and conferred 

regarding the case schedule; 

WHEREAS, the action is stayed as to Defendant Lehman Brothers Inc. as a result of its 

liquidation under the Securities Investor Protection Act; 

 WHEREAS, on December 4, 2009, in anticipation of a Case Management Conference 

scheduled for the following week, the parties filed a Joint Case Management Statement and 

[Proposed] Order that included deadlines in 2011; 

WHEREAS, on December 11, 2009, the Court convened the Case Management 

Conference, but advised the parties to confer further on scheduling to avoid including any 2011 

dates; 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred to discuss the Court’s concerns and they 

have agreed upon a revised case schedule; 

THEREFORE, IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned 

counsel for the parties, subject to the Court’s approval, that the following Proposed Schedule shall 

govern this case: 

ACTION DEADLINE OR DUE DATE 

Class Certification Motion: April 15, 2010 

Opposition: May 28, 2010 

Reply: June 11, 2010 

Amendment of Pleadings to Add Parties, 

Claims, or Defenses 

April 1, 2010 

Fact Discovery Ends June 30, 2010 

Deadline to File Motion(s) to Compel Fact 

Discovery 

July 10, 2010 

Case 3:08-cv-00271-CRB Document 97 Filed 01/13/10 Page 2 of 5
-3- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The party with the burden of proof discloses 

expert report(s) and identity of expert(s) 

July 7, 2010 

The party without the burden of proof 

discloses rebuttal expert report(s) and 

identity of expert(s) 

July 27, 2010 

Expert Discovery Ends August 10, 2010 

Deadline to File Motion(s) to Compel Expert 

Discovery 

August 18, 2010 

Dispositive Motions and Daubert/Kumho 

Motions 

Motion: September 15, 2010 

Opposition: October 15, 2010 

Reply: November 1, 2010 

Pre-Trial Conference November 1, 2010 

Trial: Plaintiffs have requested a jury trial, 

and the parties anticipate that a trial of this 

matter will last approximately three weeks. 

December 1, 2010, subject to the Court’s 

schedule 

 

Dated: January 4, 2010 KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC 

 /s/ Kim E. Miller 

Kim E. Miller 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class 

Dated: January 4, 2010 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

 /s/ Catherine Kevane 

Catherine Kevane 

Attorneys for Defendants ShoreTel, Inc.; 

John W. Combs; Michael E. Healy; 

Edwin J. Basart; Mark F. Bregman; Gary J. 

Daichendt; Thomas Van Overbeek; Kenneth 

D. Denman; Charles D. Kissner; and Edward 

F. Thompson 

November 4, 2010 December 16, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-00271-CRB Document 97 Filed 01/13/10 Page 3 of 5
-4- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: January 4, 2010 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP 

 /s/ Charlene S. Shimada 

Charlene S. Shimada 

Attorneys for Defendant J.P. Morgan 

Securities Inc. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Court Judge 

Jan. 7, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:08-cv-00271-CRB Document 97 Filed 01/13/10 Page 4 of 5
-5- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 

 I, Kim E. Miller, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document was obtained from 

the other signatories noted above. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Dated this 4th day of January 2010, in New York, New York. 

 /s/ Kim E. Miller 

Kim E. Miller 

Case 3:08-cv-00271-CRB Document 97 Filed 01/13/10 Page 5 of 5