Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01113/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01113-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05:552 Right to Privacy Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: TELEPHONE APPEARANCE FOR ORAL

ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

Peter S. Young CA SB No. 60219

Attorney at Law

271 Miller Ave.

Mill Valley, CA 94941

(415) 388-2400; Facsimile (415) 388-2476

webtuner@pacbell.net

William C. Carpenter Jr., Pro Hac Vice, Oregon SB No. 90045

474 Willamette St., Suite 303

Eugene, OR 97401 

(541) 484-4436; Facsimile: (541) 683-1346

wcarpenter@igc.org

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DONNA STAFFORD, )

 )

) C 05-01113 EDL

Plaintiff, )

v. ) JOINT STIPULATION AND 

) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE

and THE UNITED STATES, ) BY TELEPHONE FOR ORAL

) ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S 

Defendants. ) MOTION TO COMPEL ) 

Subject to the approval of this Court, plaintiff Donna Stafford and defendant, the Social

Security Administration, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to allow Ms.

Stafford’s pro hac vice counsel, Mr. William C. Carpenter Jr., to attend the 9 a.m.- March 31,

2006 oral argument on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel and Marin County’s Motion to Quash by

telephone. 

Because no defendants’ opposition is expected to be filed against plaintiff’s motion,

Case 3:05-cv-01113-EDL Document 56 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: TELEPHONE APPEARANCE FOR ORAL

ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

although an interested persons’ opposition is expected, and the travel time and expense involved

is significant, and pro hac vice counsel is traveling the following week to conduct depositions

and a mediation, that this stipulation is presented with good cause. Further, Ms. Stafford’s local

counsel Mr. Young can appear personally at oral argument in the matter if it is held in open

court. It was unable to be presented sooner because the date and time were not actually set, and

because of discovery motions often occurring via telephone, counsel is yet unsure whether this

stipulated order is required, but files it as a caution. Pro hac vice counsel is planning to away

from his office telephone that day, but will be standing by a telephone with the number (541)-

593-3985.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: March 27th, 2006 PETER S. YOUNG, Attorney At Law

 /s/ 

PETER S. YOUNG

Attorney for Plaintiff Donna Stafford

DATED: March 27th, 2006 WILLIAM C. CARPENTER, JR., Attorney At Law

 /s/ 

WILLIAM C. CARPENTER, JR.

Attorney Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff Donna Stafford

DATED: March 27th, 2006 KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

 /s/ 

JONATHAN U. LEE

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

March 28, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:05-cv-01113-EDL Document 56 Filed 03/28/06 Page 2 of 2