Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01673/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01673-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK ALEO,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-01673-KJN P 

ORDER AND ORDER DIRECTING 

SERVICE BY THE UNITED STATES 

MARSHAL WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF 

COSTS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint on August 14, 2013, and paid the filing fee.

Plaintiff’s complaint appears to state potential cognizable claims for relief pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), and the Eighth Amendment’s proscription against 

deliberate indifference to a prisoner’s serious medical needs, against defendants Christopher 

Smith, S. Heatley, Lawrence Fong, Rebecca Barnett, and L. D. Zamora.

1

 If the allegations of the 

 

1

Plaintiff is advised that the use of “Doe” defendants is not favored in the Ninth Circuit. See

Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980). Therefore, the claims against Doe 

defendants must be dismissed without prejudice. However, where the identity of alleged 

defendants cannot be known prior to the filing of a complaint, plaintiff should be given an 

opportunity through discovery to identify them. Id. Failure to afford the plaintiff such an 

opportunity is error. Wakefield v. Thompson, 177 F.3d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, 

if plaintiff learns the identity of a Doe defendant through discovery or by other means, he may 

move to file an amended complaint to add the newly-named defendant. Brass v. County of Los 

Angeles, 328 F.3d 1192, 1195-98 (9th Cir. 2003).

Case 2:13-cv-01673-GEB-KJN Document 5 Filed 08/27/13 Page 1 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of the action. 

The Clerk of the Court will be directed to issue the appropriate number of summonses to plaintiff 

for purposes of service of process. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.

Plaintiff shall complete service of process in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 4 within sixty days from the date of this order.2 Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this 

order on each defendant together with a summons and a copy of the complaint. Within 120 days 

from the date of this order, plaintiff and defendants shall each submit to the court and serve by 

mail on all other parties the following status report:

1. Whether this matter is ready for trial and, if not, why not;

2. Whether additional discovery is deemed necessary. If further discovery is deemed 

necessary, the party desiring it shall state the nature and scope of the discovery and provide an 

estimate of the time needed in which to complete it;

3. Whether a pretrial motion is contemplated. If any such motion is contemplated, the 

party intending to file it shall describe the type of motion and shall state the time needed to file 

the motion and to complete the time schedule set forth in Local Rule 230(l);

4. A narrative statement of the facts that will be offered by oral or documentary evidence 

at trial;

5. A list of all exhibits to be offered into evidence at the trial of the case;

6. A list of the names and addresses of all witnesses the party intends to call;

7. A summary of the anticipated testimony of any witnesses who are presently 

incarcerated;

8. The time estimated for trial;

9. Whether either party still requests trial by jury; and

10. Any other matter, not covered above, which the party desires to call to the attention of 

the court.

 

2

 Plaintiff is cautioned that this action may be dismissed if service of process is not 

accomplished within 120 days from the date the complaint was filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

Case 2:13-cv-01673-GEB-KJN Document 5 Filed 08/27/13 Page 2 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

In addition, plaintiff shall inform the court in his status report of the date and manner of 

service of process.

The parties are informed that they may, if all consent, have this case tried by a United 

States Magistrate Judge while preserving their right to appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals. An 

appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge is attached. Any party choosing to 

consent may complete the form and return it to the clerk of this court. Neither the magistrate 

judge nor the district judge handling the case will be notified of the filing of a consent form 

unless all parties to the action have consented.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue and send plaintiff five (5) summonses, for 

defendants Christopher Smith, S. Heatley, Lawrence Fong, Rebecca Barnett, and L. D. Zamora.

The Clerk shall also send plaintiff six (6) copies of the form Consent to Proceed Before United 

States Magistrate Judge with this order.

2. Plaintiff shall complete service of process on the defendants within sixty (60) days 

from the date of this order. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order and a copy of the form 

Consent to Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge on each defendant at the time the 

summons and complaint are served.

3. Defendants shall reply to the complaint within the time provided in Fed. R. Civ. P. 

12(a).

4. Plaintiff’s status report shall be filed within ninety (90) days from the date of this 

order. Defendants’ status report shall be filed within thirty days thereafter. The parties are 

advised that failure to file a status report in accordance with this order may result in the 

imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of the action and preclusion of issues or witnesses.

5. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, 

motions concerning discovery, motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7, 11, 12, 15, 41, 55, 56, 59 

and 60, and E.D. Cal. R. 110, shall be briefed pursuant to L.R. 230(l). Failure to timely oppose 

such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. See L.R. 230(l). Opposition 

to all other motions need be filed only as directed by the court. 

Case 2:13-cv-01673-GEB-KJN Document 5 Filed 08/27/13 Page 3 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

6. If plaintiff is released from prison while this case is pending, any party may request 

application of the other provisions of L.R. 230 in lieu of L.R. 230(l). Until such a motion is 

granted, L.R. 230(l) will govern all motions described in #5 above regardless of plaintiff’s 

custodial status. See L.R. 102(d).

7. Pursuant to Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n.14 (9th Cir. 2003), the court 

hereby informs plaintiff of the following requirements for opposing a motion to dismiss for 

failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b). Such a motion is a 

request that the court dismiss without prejudice any unexhausted claims. The moving party may 

submit affidavits or declarations under penalty of perjury and admissible documents to support 

the motion to dismiss. To oppose the motion, plaintiff may likewise file declarations under 

penalty of perjury and admissible documents. Plaintiff may rely on plaintiff’s statements made 

under penalty of perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal 

knowledge of the matters stated and plaintiff specifies the parts of the complaint on which 

plaintiff relies. Plaintiff may also rely on one or more affidavits or declarations sworn to by other 

persons who have personal knowledge of relevant matters. In addition, plaintiff may rely on 

written records, but plaintiff must prove that the records are what plaintiff asserts they are. If 

plaintiff fails to contradict defendant’s evidence with admissible evidence, the court may rely on 

defendant’s evidence. In the event both sides submit matters outside of the pleadings, the court 

may look beyond the pleadings and decide disputed issues of fact. If plaintiff does not file a 

written opposition to the motion, the court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of 

opposition to the motion. See L.R. 230(l). If the court grants the motion to dismiss, whether 

opposed or unopposed, plaintiff’s unexhausted claims will be dismissed without prejudice.

8. If defendant moves to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, defendant 

must contemporaneously serve with the motion, but in a separate document, a copy of the 

attached Wyatt Notice. See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 935 (9th Cir. 2012); Wyatt, 315 F.3d 

at 1115, 1120 n.14. Failure to do so may constitute grounds for denial of the motion.

9. Pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and 

Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the court hereby informs plaintiff of the 

Case 2:13-cv-01673-GEB-KJN Document 5 Filed 08/27/13 Page 4 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

following requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

56. Such a motion is a request for an order for judgment in favor of the defendant without trial. 

A defendant’s motion for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendant contends 

are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle the defendant to judgment. To oppose a 

motion for summary judgment, plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may do 

this in one or more of the following ways. Plaintiff may rely on plaintiff’s statements made under 

penalty of perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge 

of the matters stated and plaintiff specifies those parts of the complaint on which plaintiff relies. 

Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or declarations setting forth the facts that 

plaintiff believes prove plaintiff’s claims; the person who signs an affidavit or declaration must 

have personal knowledge of the facts stated. Plaintiff may rely on written records, but plaintiff 

must prove that the records are what plaintiff asserts they are. Plaintiff may rely on all or any part 

of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions obtained in 

this proceeding. If plaintiff fails to contradict the defendant’s evidence with counteraffidavits or 

other admissible evidence, the court may accept defendant’s evidence as true and grant the 

motion. If there is some good reason why such facts are not available to plaintiff when required 

to oppose a motion for summary judgment, the court will consider a request to postpone 

consideration of the defendant’s motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). If plaintiff does not serve and 

file a written opposition to the motion, or a request to postpone consideration of the motion, the 

court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of opposition to the defendant’s motion. See

L.R. 230(l). If the court grants the motion for summary judgment, whether opposed or 

unopposed, judgment will be entered for the defendant without a trial and the case will be closed

as to that defendant.

10. If defendant moves for summary judgment, defendant must contemporaneously serve 

with the motion, but in a separate document, a copy of the attached Rand Notice. See Woods, 

684 F.3d at 935; Rand, 154 F.3d at 957. Failure to do so may constitute grounds for denial of 

the motion. 

////

Case 2:13-cv-01673-GEB-KJN Document 5 Filed 08/27/13 Page 5 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

11. Unsigned affidavits or declarations will be stricken, and affidavits or declarations not 

signed under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value.

12. Each party proceeding without counsel shall keep the court informed of a current 

address at all times while the action is pending. Any change of address must be reported 

promptly to the court in a separate document captioned for this case and entitled “Notice of 

Change of Address.” A notice of change of address must be properly served on other parties. 

Service of documents at the address of record for a party is fully effective. See L.R. 182(f). A 

party’s failure to inform the court of a change of address may result in the imposition of sanctions 

including dismissal of the action.

13. The Clerk of the Court shall serve on plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules of Court.

14. The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, or the Local Rules of Court, may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but 

not limited to, dismissal of the action or entry of default. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

15. The Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 27, 2013

aleo1673.8.fee

Case 2:13-cv-01673-GEB-KJN Document 5 Filed 08/27/13 Page 6 of 8
Wyatt Notice to Plaintiff

This notice is provided to ensure that you, a pro se prisoner plaintiff, “have fair, timely and adequate notice 

of what is required” to oppose a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. See Woods v. 

Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1115, 1120 n.15 (9th Cir. 2003). The court 

requires that you be provided with this notice regarding the requirements for opposing a motion to dismiss for 

failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 

When a defendant moves to dismiss some or all of your claims for failure to exhaust administrative 

remedies, the defendant is requesting that the court dismiss claims for which you did not exhaust available 

administrative remedies. A “motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is similar to a motion 

for a summary judgment in that the district court will consider materials beyond the pleadings.” Stratton v. Buck, 

2012 WL 4094937, at *3 (9th Cir. Sept. 19, 2012). The defendant may submit affidavits or declarations under 

penalty of perjury and admissible documents in support of the motion. 

To oppose the motion, you must submit proof of specific facts regarding the exhaustion of administrative 

remedies. To do this, you may refer to specific statements made in your complaint if you signed your complaint 

under penalty of perjury and if your complaint shows that you have personal knowledge of the matters stated. You 

may also submit declarations setting forth facts regarding exhaustion of your claims, as long as the person who signs 

the declaration has personal knowledge of the facts stated. You may also submit all or part of deposition transcripts, 

answers to interrogatories, admissions, and other authenticated documents. If you fail to contradict the defendant’s 

evidence with your own evidence, the court may accept the defendant’s evidence as the truth and grant the motion. 

If you do not respond to the motion, the court may consider your failure to act as a waiver of your opposition. See

L.R. 230(l). 

If the court grants the defendant’s motion, whether opposed or unopposed, your unexhausted claims will be 

dismissed. If all of your claims are unexhausted, your entire case will be over. If, however, you exhaust 

administrative remedies for your claims at a later date, you may raise those claims in a new action.

Case 2:13-cv-01673-GEB-KJN Document 5 Filed 08/27/13 Page 7 of 8
Rand Notice to Plaintiff

This notice is provided to ensure that you, a pro se prisoner plaintiff, “have fair, timely and adequate notice 

of what is required” to oppose a motion for summary judgment. See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); 

Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998). The court requires that you be provided with this notice 

regarding the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure. 

When a defendant moves for summary judgment, the defendant is requesting that the court grant judgment 

in defendant’s favor without a trial. If there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your 

case, the defendant who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your 

case against that defendant. A motion for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendant asserts are 

not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle the defendant to judgment. 

To oppose a motion for summary judgment, you must show proof of your claims. To do this, you may 

refer to specific statements made in your complaint if you signed your complaint under penalty of perjury and if 

your complaint shows that you have personal knowledge of the matters stated. You may also submit declarations 

setting forth the facts that you believe prove your claims, as long as the person who signs the declaration has 

personal knowledge of the facts stated. You may also submit all or part of deposition transcripts, answers to 

interrogatories, admissions, and other authenticated documents. For each of the facts listed in the defendant’s 

Statement of Undisputed Facts, you must admit the facts that are undisputed, and deny the facts that are disputed. If 

you deny a fact, you must cite to the proof that you rely on to support your denial. See L.R. 260(b). If you fail to 

contradict the defendant’s evidence with your own evidence, the court may accept the defendant’s evidence as the 

truth and grant the motion. 

The court will consider a request to postpone consideration of the defendant’s motion if you submit a 

declaration showing that for a specific reason you cannot present such facts in your opposition. If you do not 

respond to the motion, the court may consider your failure to act as a waiver of your opposition. See L.R. 230(l). 

If the court grants the defendant’s motion, whether opposed or unopposed, judgment will be entered for 

that defendant without a trial and the case will be closed as to that defendant.

Case 2:13-cv-01673-GEB-KJN Document 5 Filed 08/27/13 Page 8 of 8