Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00643/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00643-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DWAYNE L. BURGESS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-0643 GEB GGH P

vs.

CHERYL K. PLILER, 

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 3, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:03-cv-00643-GEB-GGH Document 77 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 3, 2006 are adopted in full; 

2. Defendants’ July 5, 2005 motion to dismiss, pursuant to nonenumerated Fed.

R. Civ. P. 12(b), for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is granted in part and denied in

part as follows:

(a) Granted as to plaintiff’s claims against defendants King and Rogers

and defendants King and Rogers are dismissed from this action;

(b) Denied as to plaintiff’s allegations against defendants Chisum,

Bledsoe, Pugh and Johnson and this action will proceed as to these defendants;

3. Plaintiff’s representations that he has abandoned his claims for declaratory and

injunctive relief are construed as a motion for voluntary dismissal of these claims for relief and

said motion is granted, and this action shall proceed against the remaining defendants on a claim

of money damages only.

Dated: March 21, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-00643-GEB-GGH Document 77 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2