Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00163/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00163-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE: Case No. 1:10-CV-00163 LJO DLB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARIE L. FIALA (CA Bar No. 79676)

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

555 California Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1715 

Telephone: 415-772-1200

Facsimile: 415-772-7400

mfiala@sidley.com

Counsel For Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

NATIONAL PETROCHEMICAL & 

REFINERS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN 

TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, THE 

CENTER FOR NORTH AMERICAN 

ENERGY SECURITY, and THE 

CONSUMER ENERGY ALLIANCE,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

JAMES GOLDSTENE, in his official 

capacity as Executive Officer of the 

California Air Resources Board; MARY D. 

NICHOLS, DANIEL SPERLING, KEN 

YEAGER, DORENE D’ADAMO,

BARBARA RIORDAN, JOHN R. 

BALMES, LYDIA H. KENNARD,

SANDRA BERG, RON ROBERTS, JOHN 

G. TELLES, and RONALD O.

LOVERIDGE, in their official capacities as 

members of the California Air Resources 

Board; ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER 

in his official capacity as Governor of the 

State of California; and EDMUND G. 

BROWN, JR. in his official capacity as 

Attorney General of the State of California, 

Defendants

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:10-CV-00163 LJO DLB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE 

MANDATORY SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

Case 1:10-cv-00163-LJO-DLB Document 78 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 4
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE: Case No. 1:10-CV-00163 LJO DLB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS on February 2, 2010, Plaintiffs National Petrochemical & Refiners 

Association, American Trucking Associations, the Center for North American Energy Security, 

and the Consumer Energy Alliance filed a Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and 

Jury Demand.

WHEREAS on January 28, 2010, Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, Redwood 

County Minnesota Corn and Soybean Growers, Penny Newman Grain, Inc., Growth Energy, 

Renewable Fuels Association, Rex Nederend, Nisei Farmers League, the Fresno County Farm 

Bureau, and the California Dairy Campaign (collectively “RMFU Plaintiffs”) filed a Second 

Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (the “Second Amended 

Complaint”) which challenges the same regulation at issue in this action.

WHEREAS Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint in this action 

and the RMFU Plaintiffs’ complaint in the related action which have been briefed and are 

scheduled to be heard on June 16, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4.

WHEREAS the Mandatory Scheduling Conferences for both actions are set for 

the same day at the Defendants’ request and are presently set for June 30, 2010, at 9:15 a.m. in 

Courtroom No. 9.

WHEREAS Defendants have requested, and both the Plaintiffs and the RMFU 

Plaintiffs have agreed, to stipulate to continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference to July 

28, 2010, to accommodate the Court’s hearing and ruling on the Motions to Dismiss.

WHEREAS all parties are available to conduct the Mandatory Scheduling 

Conference in these actions on July 28, 2010, and have agreed to hold it on this date.

Case 1:10-cv-00163-LJO-DLB Document 78 Filed 06/09/10 Page 2 of 4
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE: Case No. 1:10-CV-00163 LJO DLB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs in both actions and 

Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, that: 

1. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this Action, previously scheduled for 

June 30, 2010, should be continued to July 28, 2010, at 9:15 a.m. or such time as may be set by 

the Court, in Courtroom 9 (6th Floor). 

Dated: June 8, 2010 STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

By: /s/ Mark Poole (as authorized on 6/8/2010)

Mark Poole, 

Attorneys for Defendant

Dated: June 8, 2010 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: /s/ Roger R. Martella, Jr. 

Roger R. Martella, Jr., 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: June 8, 2010 NATURAL RESOURCES

DEFENSE COUNCIL

By: /s/ David Pettit (as authorized on 6/8/2010)

David Pettit, 

Attorneys for Applicants Natural Resources 

Defense Council, Inc. and Conservation 

Law Foundation

Dated: June 8, 2010 SIERRA CLUB

By: /s/ Pat Gallagher (as authorized on 6/8/2010)

Pat Gallagher, 

Attorneys for Applicant Sierra Club

Case 1:10-cv-00163-LJO-DLB Document 78 Filed 06/09/10 Page 3 of 4
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE: Case No. 1:10-CV-00163 LJO DLB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing 

therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this 

action, previously scheduled for June 30, 2010, shall be continued to July 28, 2010, at 9:00 

a.m. in Courtroom 9 (6th Floor).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

3b142a

Case 1:10-cv-00163-LJO-DLB Document 78 Filed 06/09/10 Page 4 of 4