Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03148-111/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 05-CV-3148 MMC [JCS] 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MEDIATEK’S MOT. TO CONTINUE PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL DATES IN LIGHT OF KSR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

MEDIATEK, INC., OPPO DIGITAL, INC., and

MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL 

COMPUTER CORP., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-CV-3148-MMC 

ORDER DENYING MEDIATEK’S 

MOTION FOR ORDER CONTINUING 

PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL DATES IN 

LIGHT OF THE SUPREME COURT’S 

KSR INTERNATIONAL V. TELEFLEX 

DECISION; DENYING AS MOOT 

MATSUSHITA’S MOTION TO 

CONTINUE HEARING; VACATING 

HEARING 

MEDIATEK, INC., 

Counterclaimant, 

v.

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL 

CO., LTD. and PANASONIC CORPORATION 

OF NORTH AMERICA, 

Counterclaim Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Judge: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1209 Filed 06/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 - 

CASE NO. 05-CV-3148 MMC [JCS] 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MEDIATEK’S MOT. TO CONTINUE PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL DATES IN LIGHT OF KSR

Before the Court is Defendant and Counterclaimant MediaTek, Inc.’s (“MediaTek”) 

Motion for Order Continuing Pre-Trial and Trial Dates in Light of the Supreme Court’s KSR

International v. Teleflex Decision, the Opposition filed by Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (“Matsushita”), and the Reply filed by MediaTek. 

For the reasons stated by Matsushita, MediaTek’s Motion for Order Continuing Pre-Trial 

and Trial Dates in Light of the Supreme Court’s KSR International v. Teleflex Decision is hereby 

DENIED.

The hearing scheduled for June 29, 2007 is VACATED; Matsushita’s motion to continue 

the hearing to July 13, 2007 is DENIED as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 25, 2007 

_________________________________________

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Court 

Case 3:05-cv-03148-MMC Document 1209 Filed 06/25/07 Page 2 of 2