Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01945/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-01945-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

JESSICA A. DAYTON (State Bar #231698)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JAREK MOLSKI

and DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION

SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK MOLSKI, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES:HELPING

YOU HELP OTHERS, a California public

benefit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MORGAN HILL 76; TOSCO

CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation;

and SATNAM PETROLEUM INC., a

California corporation, dba MORGAN

HILL 76, 

Defendants. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 04-1945 JW

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own costs

and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction

over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375

(1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement

agreements).

Case 5:04-cv-01945-JW Document 22 Filed 10/10/2005 Page 1 of 2

xxxxxxxxxxx

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON -2-

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through

their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: October 10, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: ________/s/_________________________

Jessica A. Dayton

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS

DATED: September 23, 2005 STEPHEN THOMAS ERB, APC

By: _______/s/__________________________

Stephen Thomas Erb

Attorney for Defendants TOSCO CORPORATION,

and SATNAM PETROLEUM INC.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for 

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such 

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: ______________, 2005

Hon. James Ware

United States District Court Judge

Case 5:04-cv-01945-JW Document 22 Filed 10/10/2005 Page 2 of 2

10/12/05