Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_05-cv-00546/USCOURTS-ared-4_05-cv-00546-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

 : MDL DOCKET NO. 4:03-CV-1507-WRW

IN RE: :

PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY :

LITIGATION :

_____________________________________________________________________________

HELEN HILL PLAINTIFF

v. 4:05-CV-00546-WRW

WYETH, et al. DEFENDANTS

_____________________________________________________________________________

DIANE LAFERRARA PLAINTIFF

v. 4:04-CV-02271-WRW

WYETH, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

I have just read Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Oral Motions for Consolidation of the Hill1

and Laferrara2 cases. Although, I told Plaintiffs they could respond by Wednesday, April 7, 2010, no

response will be necessary.

Plaintiffs’ oral motion to consolidate the cases is DENIED. While there may be instances when

consolidation will be appropriate, this is not one of those instances. The two plaintiffs are suing different

manufacturers, took different drugs for different reasons, suffered different injuries,3

 etc.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of April, 2010.

 /s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr._____________

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

1

Doc. No. 411.

2

Doc. No. 24.

3

Although both women had breast cancer, one underwent a lumpectomy and the other underwent

a mastectomy.

Case 4:05-cv-00546-BRW Document 412 Filed 04/01/10 Page 1 of 1