Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01347/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01347-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Dennis Marlowe, et ux., 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

Pinal County, et al., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-1347-PHX-PGR

 

 ORDER

In an order (doc. #51) entered on September 5, 2007, the Court struck the

defendants’ statement of facts supporting their summary judgment motion with

leave to refile because the document violated the District of Arizona’s General

Order 04-26 by failing to delete personal identifiers from exhibits and because it

failed to properly authenticate certain exhibits. Having placed counsel on notice

that these types of deficiencies were unacceptable, the Court finds it to be

inexplicable that it has to issue the same type of order with regard to the plaintiffs’

Statement of Facts (doc. #57), filed October 19, 2007. 

A preliminary review of the plaintiffs’ document reveals that it improperly

contains personal identifiers regarding Alyce Marlowe, e.g. her birth date and

Social Security number. See page 1 of Exhibit 4 (Page 7 of Mrs. Marlowe’s

deposition.) The Court’s review also reveals that the plaintiffs have not made

Case 2:06-cv-01347-PGR Document 60 Filed 10/24/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The Court also notes that the affidavit of the plaintiffs’ expert, Alan

Baxter, states that a copy of his Curriculum Vitae is attached. It is not attached.

2

 The plaintiffs shall place the correct case number on their amended

statement of facts.

- 2 -

any effort to properly authenticate their exhibits.1 See e.g., Orr v. Bank of

America, NT & SA, 285 F.3d 764, 774 (9th Cir. 2002). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Statement of Facts in Support of its [sic]

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. #57) is stricken

from the record in its entirety.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs shall file their Amended

Statement of Facts in Support of Their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for

Summary Judgment no later than October 31, 2007.2

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-01347-PGR Document 60 Filed 10/24/07 Page 2 of 2