Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02010/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02010-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KERRY ATKINSON, ) NO. CIV-S 04-2010 GEB (JFM)

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER WITHDRAWING MOTION FOR 

) LEAVE TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY AND

v. ) AMENDING STATUS (PRETRIAL

) SCHEDULING) ORDER

) 

)

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE )

COMPANY, et al., )

Defendants. )

)

On May 27, 2005, the parties filed a stipulation requesting

that the Scheduling Order be modified so that the last hearing date

for a motion seeking leave to conduct discovery be moved from June 13,

2005, to July 13, 2005. The parties state this change is requested

because Plaintiff desires time to consider whether discovery is needed

after reviewing the administrative record and applicable plan

documents that Defendants provided to her on or around May 10, 2005

(collectively “Documents”).

Plaintiff already filed a motion for leave to conduct

discovery on May 10, 2005, but it is unclear whether Plaintiff is

entitled to discovery other than what is in the Documents. 

Case 2:04-cv-02010-GEB -JFM Document 17 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Consequently, Plaintiff’s motion is deemed withdrawn.

The Scheduling Order is modified such that the final date

for a hearing on a motion in which Plaintiff requests leave to conduct

discovery is August 15, 2005, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 6, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02010-GEB -JFM Document 17 Filed 06/07/05 Page 2 of 2