Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04869/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04869-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISION

DANIEL CANADAY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15-cv-04648-JSW (NJV)

EDMUNDO ORTEGA, JR., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15-cv-04676-JSW (NJV)

Case 4:15-cv-04869-JSW Document 68 Filed 08/22/16 Page 1 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JASON WILLIAMS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15-cv-04732-JSW (NJV)

LAMBERTO VALENCIA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15-cv-04771-JSW (NJV)

JEFFREY COLEMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15-cv-04782-JSW (NJV)

RICHARD NELSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15-cv-04793-JSW (NJV)

CALEB DUBOIS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15-cv-04809-JSW (NJV)

Case 4:15-cv-04869-JSW Document 68 Filed 08/22/16 Page 2 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GREGORY PETERS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15-cv-04869-JSW (NJV)

LUPE LANDIN, JR., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-04174-JSW (NJV)

CORY BARRETT HALL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-04175-JSW (NJV)

FRANCISCO FLORES,, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-04176 (NJV)

Case 4:15-cv-04869-JSW Document 68 Filed 08/22/16 Page 3 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH JOSHUA DAVIS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-04177-JSW (NJV)

JAMES K. GRIMES., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-04178 (NJV)

STEPHEN MCBRIDE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-04179 (NJV)

LAWRENCE ELKINS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-04180 (NJV)

Case 4:15-cv-04869-JSW Document 68 Filed 08/22/16 Page 4 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

HERNAN PAEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-04181 (NJV)

KRIS COOK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-04182 (NJV)

KEVIN HUFFMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 16-cv-04183 (NJV)

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: COMCAST’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL

Defendant Comcast Cable Communication Management LLP’s (“Comcast”) (erroneously 

sued as Comcast Corporation) motion to compel discovery was heard telephonically on August 9, 

2016 before the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas in the following actions: DuBois v. Comcast 

Corporation, Case No. 3:15-cv-04809-JSW-NJV; Nelson v. Comcast Corporation, Case No. 4:15-

cv-04793-JSW-NJV; Peters v. Comcast Corporation, Case No. 3:15-cv-04689-JSW-NJV; 

Canaday v. Comcast Corporation, Case No. 4:15-cv-04648-JSW-NJV; Ortega v. Comcast

Corporation, Case No. 4:15-cv-04676-JSW-NJV; Valencia v. Comcast Corporation, Case No.

4:15-cv-04771-JSW-NJV; Williams v. Comcast Corporation, Case No. 4:15-cv-04732-JSW-NJV; 

and Coleman v. Comcast Corporation, Case No. 4:15-cv-04782-JSW-NJV. Patrick Terry, Esq. 

Case 4:15-cv-04869-JSW Document 68 Filed 08/22/16 Page 5 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

appeared on behalf of all Plaintiffs. Troy A. Valdez appeared on behalf of Comcast. After 

considering the parties’ positions, and counsel’s arguments, the Court hereby Orders as follows:

With respect to Roman Numeral I, the Court Orders that Plaintiffs Oscar Argueta, Albert 

Gomez, Nathan Lines, Glenn Peterson, Ryan Stewart, Lawrence Wing, Jon Sanfelipe, Jose 

Gonzalez, Jr., Hans Bogusch, Benjamin Cabanayan, Richard Cervantes, Carlos Estrada, Jose 

Gonzalez, Steven Kremesec, Jr., Christian Olague, James Sargent, Chieu Vo, Edmundo Ortega, 

Jr., Lamberto Valencia, Jonathan Anglin, Brian Antis, Kevin Cook, Kord Evans, Gerwin Gitana, 

Hector Martinez, Peter Neang, Richard Pridmore, Samour Soeung, Jeffrey Coleman, Christopher 

Thatcher, Craig McCullom, Jeff Keith Chung, Tyree L. Anthony, Marlin Kelley, Roderick 

Hammond, Richard Brown, Luis Armas, Damian Ruiz, William Dantzman, Joshua Raymond 

Peppars, Terrence Ruffen, Robert Milligan, Meagan Medina, Rolando Jackson, and Ryan Dunbar 

shall provide signed and dated verifications to their interrogatory responses by 5 p.m. on 

September 9, 2016.

With respect to Roman Numeral II, the Court Orders that Plaintiffs Ryan Murray, Karlo 

Ayala, Mario Hankton, Jonathan Morant, Elizabeth Perkins, and Richard Phillip Martin shall 

provide signed and dated verifications to their interrogatory responses by 5 p.m. on September 9, 

2016.

With respect to Roman Numeral III (whether Plaintiff shall include a privilege log 

identifying 2013 correspondence sent to Plaintiff) the Court Orders the parties to submit further 

briefing on this matter. The parties shall submit a simultaneous brief not to exceed 10 pages, on or 

before September 20, 2016 at p.m. supporting their respective position. The Court will hold a 

further hearing regarding this issue on October 4, 2016 at 11 a.m., in the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco, California.

With respect to Roman Numeral Number IV (Plaintiffs’ responses to Interrogatory Nos. 2, 

4 and 6) the Court Denies Comcast’s requests to have Plaintiffs provide further supplemental 

responses to these interrogatories. 

With respect to Roman Number V (Plaintiff’s responses to Comcast’s Request for 

Production Nos. 7, 8, 22, and 23) the Court Orders that Plaintiffs shall provide all responsive 

Case 4:15-cv-04869-JSW Document 68 Filed 08/22/16 Page 6 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

documents in each Plaintiffs’ custody, care and control. Plaintiffs are not required to seek records 

held by third party providers where such records are not in their possession. To the extent that the 

Plaintiffs do not have responsive documents, each of them shall identify any third party entity 

(such as banks, credit card companies or cellular phone providers) with whom they maintained 

accounts during the relevant period, including identifying the account number, estimate of dates 

the account was held, and name under which the account was held, so that Comcast can seek to 

subpoena these records directly from the providers. The Plaintiffs in Canaday and Valencia shall 

have until 5 p.m. on September 20, 2016 to provide responses consistent with this order. The 

Plaintiffs in Dubois, Nelson, Peters, Ortega, Williams, and Coleman shall have until 5 p.m. on 

October 10, 2016 to provide responses consistent with this Order.

With respect to Roman Numeral VI (the depositions of Ryan Murray and Philip Richard 

Martin) the Court Orders that Plaintiffs shall have until September 9, 2016 to schedule and sit for 

their depositions or dismiss their cases.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 22, 2016 ______________________________

 Honorable Nandor J. Vadas

Case 4:15-cv-04869-JSW Document 68 Filed 08/22/16 Page 7 of 7