Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02042/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02042-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

---

Stip for Remand, 2:14-cv-02042-CMK 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

INGRID ANDERSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of 

Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CIVIL NO. 2:14-cv-02042-CMK 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE 

FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), AND 

REQUEST FOR JUDGMENT IN 

FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND 

AGAINST DEFENDANT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of 

record, that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative 

action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence 

four. 

 On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) 

and will instruct the ALJ to take the following action: 

1. Provide the Plaintiff with an opportunity for a new hearing; 

BENJAMIN WAGNER CSBN 163581

United States Attorney 

DEBORAH STACHEL 

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

Social Security Administration 

MARLA K. LETELLIER, CSBN 234969 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

160 Spear Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94105 

 Telephone: (415) 977-8928 

 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 

 E-Mail: Marla.Letellier@ssa.gov 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 2:14-cv-02042-DMC Document 25 Filed 10/29/15 Page 1 of 3
Stip for Remand, 2:14-cv-02042-CMK 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Evaluate and provide rationale for the weight given to the medical opinions of record, 

including but not limited to the opinions of consulting psychiatrist Brock L. Fowler, Psy.D.; 

3. Re-assess the Plaintiff’s credibility in conjunction with the medical opinions of record 

and medical evidence as a whole; 

4. Evaluate and provide rationale as to whether Plaintiff has a spinal impairment that meets 

or medically equals a listed impairment set forth in 20 C.F.R. Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1; 

5. Consider lay witness testimony of record; 

6. Re-assess the claimant’s residual functional capacity; and 

7. Re-assess, with the assistance of a vocational expert if necessary, the steps four and five 

determinations as to the claimant’s ability to perform work that exists in significant numbers in the 

national economy. 

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment in 

favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security, reversing the final decision 

of the Commissioner. 

 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 BENJAMIN WAGNER 

United States Attorney 

 

Dated: October 27, 2015 By: /s/ Marla K. Letellier 

 MARLA K. LETELLIER 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Dated: October 27, 2015 By: /s/ Jared T. Walker 

 JARED T. WALKER 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 (as approved by email on October 23, 2015) 

Case 2:14-cv-02042-DMC Document 25 Filed 10/29/15 Page 2 of 3
Stip for Remand, 2:14-cv-02042-CMK 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

 

Dated: October 29, 2015 

Case 2:14-cv-02042-DMC Document 25 Filed 10/29/15 Page 3 of 3