Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01097/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01097-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID D. HARRIS, 1:05-cv-01097-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATION

vs. (Doc. 50)

BAKEMAN, et al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Defendants. (Doc. 45.)

_____________________________/

David D. Harris (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

 On April 25, 2008, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending

denial of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 50.) Plaintiff was provided an opportunity

to file objections to the findings and recommendations within twenty days. To date, plaintiff has not

filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-

305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on April

25, 2008, are ADOPTED in full;

Case 1:05-cv-01097-SRB Document 51 Filed 05/28/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

2. Plaintiff's second motion for summary judgment, filed January 2, 2008, is

DENIED as premature and for defective service; and

3. This action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further

proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 28, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01097-SRB Document 51 Filed 05/28/08 Page 2 of 2