Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-01841/USCOURTS-cand-3_20-cv-01841-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALESPRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITYLITIGATION MDL No. 2738

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -206)

On October 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for

the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1407. See 220 F.Supp.3d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,889 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District ofNew Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have

been assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson.It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to JudgeWolfson.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on MultidistrictLitigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of October 4, 2016, and, with the consent

ofthat court, assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United StatesDistrict Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order ofthe Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is

pending at this time, the

stay is lifted.

Mar 27, 20201 FOR THE PANEL:

CLERKSE

MULT1DI5TC1CT LiTiGATiON

John W. Nichols I

Clerk of the Panel

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above ond

foregoing is a frue and correct copy of the original on file in my office.

UNITED STATE,SJJ1.TRDISTR1CT.Of1EW’JE Y

WILLIAM T. WA..H, ER’

8y /1

/b7üty Cl k
SCHEDULE CTO-206 -TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

fIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 20—0 1841 Lipton v. Johnson & Johnson et al