Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00940/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00940-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Michael Yesk (SB#130056) 

Yesk Law 

70 Doray Drive, Suite 16 

Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 

925-849-5525 

yesklaw@gmail.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROMUALDO ENRIQUEZ and 

OLIVIA ENRIQUEZ,

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., NATIONSTAR 

MORTGAGE, LLC and THE BANK OF NEW 

YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW 

YORK as trustee for the STRUCTURED 

ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II 

TRUST 2006-AR7 MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-

AR7,

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 3:15-cv-0940-MMC 

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); 

[Proposed] ORDER

 

Plaintiffs ROMUALDO ENRIQUEZ and OLIVIA ENRIQUEZ (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and 

Defendants BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC and THE BANK 

OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK as trustee for the STRUCTURED 

ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II TRUST 2006-AR7 MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-AR7, (“Defendants”), hereby stipulate and agree that the 

Complaint and all causes of action be dismissed as to all Defendants and causes of action, pursuant 

Case 3:15-cv-00940-MMC Document 58 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and this stipulation, with prejudice, each party to bear its own 

costs and fees. 

DATED: January 15, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

_/s/ Michael Yesk____________________ 

Michael Yesk, Attorney for Plaintiffs 

DATED: January 15, 2016 Severson & Werson, APC 

_/s/_David E. Pinch_____________________ 

David E. Pinch 

Severson & Werson, PC 

One Embarcadero Center Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Attorney for Defendants 

Based on the Plaintiffs' request pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Defendant’s 

Stipulation and good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED that 

The case is dismissed as to the entire action, with prejudice, each side to bear its own 

costs and fees. 

DATED: January ____, 2016 __________________________ 

United States District Court Judge 

19

Case 3:15-cv-00940-MMC Document 58 Filed 01/19/16 Page 2 of 2