Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00885/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00885-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 31:3729 False Claims Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-00885-FCD-KJM 

016.359236.1 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

ONE MARITIME PLAZA, 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 

TELEPHONE: 415.434. 

FACSIMILE: 415.434.4507 

KEVIN F. WOODALL, BAR NO. 180650 

JENNIFER B. HOCHSCHILD, BAR NO. 221450 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS,

JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. AND WALLY BOMHOFF

THE VELEZ LAW FIRM 

6940 DESTINY DRIVE 

ROCKLIN, CA 95677 

TELEPHONE: (916) 774-2720 

FACSIMILE: (916) 774-2730 

MARK P. VELEZ, BAR NO. 163484 

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS,

DOUGLAS MOYLES AND GINA MOYLES

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

DOUGLAS MOYLES, GINA MOYLES, 

 PLAINTIFFS, 

V. 

JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., A WISCONSIN 

CORPORATION, WILLIAM E. THOMAS, 

WALLY BOMHOFF, AND DOES, 1-50,

INCLUSIVE, 

 DEFENDANTS. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-00885-FCD-KJM 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR 

OTHERWISE PLEAD PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 6-142 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Douglas and Gina Moyles (“Plaintiffs”) originally 

commenced this action by filing a Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of 

California in and for the County of Sacramento, Case Number 04 AS 03634. 

WHEREAS, on April 14, 2005, Judge Abbott of the Superior Court of the State of 

California in and for the County of Sacramento ordered that Plaintiffs may file and serve 

a Second Amended Complaint not later than Monday, April 25, 2005, and that the 

Case 2:05-cv-00885-FCD-KJM Document 9 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-00885-FCD-KJM 

016.359236.1 

responsive pleading shall be filed fifteen days thereafter if service is by mail. On April 

25, 2005, Plaintiffs filed and served by mail a Second Amended Complaint. 

WHEREAS, on May 4, 2005, Defendants Johnson Controls, Inc. and Wally 

Bomhoff (“Defendants”) filed a Notice of Removal of this action from the Superior Court 

of the State of California. 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants agree that nothing in this Stipulation shall 

be construed to be a waiver of any right by Plaintiffs to file a Motion to Remand. 

Wherefore, the parties hereby stipulate, pursuant to Local Rule 6-142, that 

Defendants Johnson Controls, Inc. and Wally Bomhoff’s deadline to respond to 

Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint by answer or other responsive pleading, be 

extended for two weeks from May 10, 2005, to May 24, 2005. 

DATE: MAY 6, 2005 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

KEVIN F. WOODALL

JENNIFER B. HOCHSCHILD

BY: __________________________________

KEVIN F. WOODALL

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS,

JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. AND WALLY 

BOMHOFF

DATE: MAY 6, 2005 THE VELEZ LAW FIRM

MARK P. VELEZ

BY: __________________________________

MARK P. VELEZ

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS, DOUGLAS 

MOYLES AND GINA MOYLES

IT IS SO ORDERED 

DATE: MAY 9, 2005 

BY: /S/ FRANK C. DAMRELL JR. .

HONORABLE FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. 

Case 2:05-cv-00885-FCD-KJM Document 9 Filed 05/09/05 Page 2 of 2