Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00755/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-00755-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00755-HSG

ZEE APPAREL INC. d/b/a SHOP UNDER,

a corporation incorporated under the laws of

the Province of Quebec, Canada,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 

 

v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

THE REALREAL, INC.,

a Delaware corporation,

Defendant/Counterclaimant.

_________________________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process:

☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

X the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

☐ other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated: April 19, 2016 /s/ Hal M. Lucas (Admitted pro hac vice)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: April 19, 2016 /s/ Holly Hogan

Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case 4:16-cv-00755-HSG Document 27 Filed 04/20/16 Page 1 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER

☐ The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

☐ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11

Page 2 of 2

X

 4/20/2016

Case 4:16-cv-00755-HSG Document 27 Filed 04/20/16 Page 2 of 3
ATTESTATION

I, Hal M. Lucas, am the ECF user whose user ID and password are being utilized to 

electronically file this Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting ADR Process. I hereby attest 

that the other signatory to the foregoing document has concurred with this filing.

Dated: April 19, 2016 /s/ Hal M. Lucas (Admitted pro hac vice)

Hal M. Lucas

Case 4:16-cv-00755-HSG Document 27 Filed 04/20/16 Page 3 of 3