Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01786/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01786-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review

---

- 1 - PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

GRANTING LEAVE TO PLAINTIFF TO 

FILE AMENDED OPPOSITION 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STEPHENSON, ACQUISTO & COLMAN 

JOY Y. STEPHENSON, ESQ. (SBN 113755) 

BARRY SULLIVAN, ESQ. (SBN 136571) 

RICHARD A. LOVICH, ESQ. (SBN 113472) 

OLIVER TOMAS, ESQ. (SBN 233807) 

303 N. Glenoaks Blvd., Suite 700 

Burbank, CA 91502 

Telephone: (818) 559-4477 

Facsimile: (818) 559-5484 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THE HOSPITAL COMMITTEE FOR 

THE LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON 

AREAS d.b.a. VALLEYCARE 

HEALTH SYSTEM and also as 

VALLEYCARE MEMORIAL 

HOSPITAL, a California non-profit, 

public benefit corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, as Secretary 

of the United States Department of 

Health and Human Services, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: CV091786-EMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON 

STIPULATION GRANTING LEAVE 

TO PLAINTIFF TO FILE ITS 

AMENDED MEMORANDUM IN 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AND REPLY IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

JUDGE: HON: EDWARD M. CHEN 

COURTROOM: C 

Case 3:09-cv-01786-EMC Document 38 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

GRANTING LEAVE TO PLAINTIFF TO 

FILE AMENDED OPPOSITION 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

 1. Plaintiff is granted leave to file its Amended Memorandum in 

Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of 

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; 

 2. Plaintiff’s Amended Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's 

Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for 

Summary Judgment shall be subject to Civil L.R. 7-4(b); 

 3. Plaintiff’s Amended Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's 

Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for 

Summary Judgment shall be filed no later than January 29, 2010. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE:______________ ____________________________________ 

 HON. EDWARD M. CHEN 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:09-cv-01786-EMC Document 38 Filed 01/29/10 Page 2 of 2