Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01423/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01423-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD MOTLEY )

) 2:08-CV-01423-RLH (VPC)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

) OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

J. SMITH, et al., )

)

Defendants. ) July 16, 2010

____________________________________)

This Report and Recommendation is made to the Honorable Roger L. Hunt, United States

District Judge. The action was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On July 30, 2009, the undersigned Magistrate Judge entered a report and recommendation

allowing certain of plaintiff’s claims to proceed and recommending dismissal of certain claims

(#15). On October 27, 2009, the District Judge adopted and accepted the report and

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (#20). It has recently come to this court’s attention that

the July 30, 2010 report and recommendation contains an omission of one defendant in section

two on page ten in the listing of those claims that are allowed to proceed against certain

defendants. Section two, page ten should be amended to read as follows:

2. Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claims against

defendants Smith, Wright, and McGuire;

Therefore, the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that plaintiff’s First

Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Smith, Wright, and McGuire shall be allowed

to proceed and that all other provisions of the report and recommendation shall stand as originally

written and remain in full force and effect.

The parties are advised:

1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Rule 304(b) of the Local Rules of Practice,

the parties may file specific written objections to this report and recommendation within ten days

Case 2:08-cv-01423-RLH -VPC Document 44 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

of receipt. These objections should be entitled “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation” and should be accompanied by points and authorities for consideration by the

District Court.

2. This report and recommendation is not an appealable order and any notice of appeal

pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1) should not be filed until entry of the District Court’s judgment.

DATED: July 16, 2010.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

- 2 -

Case 2:08-cv-01423-RLH -VPC Document 44 Filed 07/19/10 Page 2 of 2