Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01755/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01755-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENCE A. GIBSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1755 LKK GGH P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On January 22, 2007, plaintiff filed a motion asking the court to reconsider its

January 8, 2007, order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss. 

Plaintiff’s motion does not meet the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) or

60(b). With respect to Rule 59(e), plaintiff has failed to 1) present the court with newly

discovered evidence, 2) show that the court committed clear error or that the decision was

manifestly unjust; or 3) identify an intervening change in controlling law. Dixon v. Wallowa

County, 336 F.3d 1013, 1022 (9th Cir. 2003). With respect to Rule 60(b), plaintiff has failed to

show 1) mistake, surprise or excusable neglect; 2) newly discovered evidence; 3) fraud; 4) a void

judgment; 5) a satisfied or discharged judgment; or 6) extraordinary circumstances. Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60(b). 

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01755-LKK -GGH Document 59 Filed 03/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s January 22, 2007,

motion for reconsideration (court file doc. # 45) is denied.

DATED: March 9, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-01755-LKK -GGH Document 59 Filed 03/12/07 Page 2 of 2