Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02064/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02064-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIMBERLY R. OLSON, No. CIV S-06-2064-MCE-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

ADAM ORECK, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §§

1983 and 1985. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s request to modify the scheduling order and

a motion to quash.

Plaintiff’s motion to quash relates to a deposition subpoena for production of

records from plaintiff’s physician. Defendants filed a response to this motion, indicating that

they have withdrawn the subpoena, and instead will be taking plaintiff’s physician’s deposition. 

Plaintiff has not filed a reply disputing this. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to quash is moot.

Plaintiff has also requested a modification of the scheduling order. She indicates

that she needs an addition 120 days to complete the discovery due to her health condition. 

Defendants have not filed an opposition to plaintiff’s request. This request will be granted.

Case 2:06-cv-02064-MCE -CMK Document 56 Filed 08/19/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to quash (Doc. 51) is denied as moot;

2. Plaintiff’s request to modify the scheduling order (Docs. 52, 53) is

granted; and

3. The scheduling order is modified as follows:

a. The parties shall exchange lists of expert witnesses, if not already done,

no later than September 30, 2008. Such disclosures must be made pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(A) and (B). The parties are reminded of

their obligation to supplement these disclosures when required under Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 26(e)(1). Failure to comply with these requirements may result

in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, which may include the preclusion of

testimony or other evidence offered through the expert witness;

b. Discovery shall be completed, and all motions pertaining to discovery

shall be noticed to be heard, by January 9, 2009;

c. All other pre-trial motions, including dispositive motions, shall be

noticed to be heard by April 6, 2009; and

d. At a later stage in the proceedings, the parties will be required to

submit reports on the status of this litigation. Following submission of status

reports from all parties, the court will issue a final scheduling order. 

DATED: August 18, 2008

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-02064-MCE -CMK Document 56 Filed 08/19/08 Page 2 of 2