Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02353/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-02353-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEALDASH OYJ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CONTEXTLOGIC INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 18-cv-02353-MMC 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 148

Before the Court is plaintiffs DealDash Oyj and DealDash Inc.’s (“DealDash”) 

“Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal Regarding DealDash’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment,” filed May 10, 2019, whereby DealDash seeks to file under seal

material it has designated confidential, as well as material designated confidential by 

defendant ContextLogic, Inc. (“ContextLogic”). Having read and considered the 

administrative motion and the declarations filed in support thereof, the Court rules as 

follows: 

1. With respect to Exhibit F to the “Declaration of Amy M. Bailey in Support of 

DealDash’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Wish’s Affirmative Defenses” (“Bailey 

Declaration”), to the extent DealDash seeks leave to file the entirety of said exhibit under 

seal, the motion to seal is hereby DENIED, as the designating party, ContextLogic, only 

contends certain portions thereof are confidential, specifically, pages 156:19 – 157:25, 

and, to such extent, good cause having been shown, the motion to seal is hereby 

Case 3:18-cv-02353-MMC Document 228 Filed 09/05/19 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

GRANTED. As ContextLogic has filed in the public record a redacted version of Exhibit F

in accordance therewith (see Doc. No. 166-2), no further action need be taken as to said 

exhibit and the unredacted version shall remain under seal. 

2. With respect to Exhibit K to the Bailey Declaration, to the extent DealDash

seeks leave to file the entirety of said exhibit under seal, the motion to seal is hereby 

DENIED, as the designating party, ContextLogic, has only shown certain portions thereof

are confidential, specifically, the information contained in the table on page 24, and, to 

such extent, good cause having been shown, the motion to seal is hereby GRANTED. 

As ContextLogic has filed in the public record a redacted version of Exhibit K in 

accordance therewith (see Doc. No. 166-4), no further action need be taken as to said 

exhibit and the unredacted version shall remain under seal. 

3. With respect to Exhibit O to the Bailey Declaration, designated confidential by 

DealDash, the motion to seal is hereby GRANTED and said exhibit shall remain under 

seal. 

4. With respect to Exhibits A, D, E, G, H, I, J, L, and 194 to the Bailey Declaration, 

the motion to seal is hereby DENIED, as the designating party, ContextLogic, does not 

contend any portions thereof contain material that is confidential, and, accordingly,

DealDash is hereby DIRECTED to file said exhibits in the public record within seven days 

of the date of this order. 

5. With respect to Exhibits P and Q to the Bailey Declaration, designated 

confidential by ContextLogic, the motion to seal is hereby DENIED, as said exhibits, 

contrary to ContextLogic’s description thereof, do not contain the identity of the authors or

any information from which such identity or any other private or personal information can 

be determined, and, accordingly, DealDash is hereby DIRECTED to file said exhibits in 

the public record within seven days of the date of this order. 

6. With respect to DealDash’s Motion for Summary Judgment, which contains 

references to material designated confidential by ContextLogic, the motion to seal is 

hereby DENIED, as ContextLogic has not shown any portions thereof contain material 

Case 3:18-cv-02353-MMC Document 228 Filed 09/05/19 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

properly filed under seal, and, accordingly, DealDash is hereby DIRECTED to file an 

unredacted version of its Motion for Summary Judgment in the public record within seven 

days of the date of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 5, 2019 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:18-cv-02353-MMC Document 228 Filed 09/05/19 Page 3 of 3