Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02404/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02404-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Sacramento Division

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:06-2404-RT Date March 15, 2010

Title: Jeffery McDonald v. Roseanne Campbell, et al. 

 

PRESENT:

THE HONORABLE ROBERT J. TIMLIN, JUDGE

 Patricia Gomez None 

 Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: 

 None None

 

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS CAMPBELL AND

GIBSON TO FILE WITH THE COURT THEIR VERIFIED SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES

TO THIS COURT’S OCTOBER 27, 2009 DISCOVERY ORDER

The court is currently considering plaintiff Jeffrey McDonald (“plaintiff” or “McDonald”)’s Opposition to

defendants Roseanne Campbell (“Campbell”) and C. Gibson (“Gibson,” collectively “defendants”)’s

Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents (the “Opposition”) and plaintiff’s

Request for Sanctions due to the Defendants’ Dilatory Motions and Contempt for this Court’s Orders (the

“Sanctions Request”). On October 27, 2009, the court ordered defendants Campbell and Gibson to provide

plaintiff with certain verified, supplemental responses to plaintiff’s requests for production of documents. 

Plaintiff’s Opposition contends that defendants have failed to so comply by submitting deficient supplemental

responses. 

The court recognizes that plaintiff provides defendants Campbell and Gibson’s supplemental responses as

an attachment to his Opposition. However, while that attachment includes the verification signed by defendant

Campbell, it does not include a verification executed by defendant Gibson. Instead, plaintiff includes a letter

submitted by defense counsel which indicates that defense counsel will ultimately provide plaintiff with defendant

Gibson’s verification at a later date and upon defendant Gibson’s return from a two-week, out-of-state trip. 

Defendants contend in their response to plaintiff’s Opposition that plaintiff’s Opposition is without merit as

demonstrated by their sufficient, verified supplemental responses. However, defendants have not themselves

provided the court with copies of their supplemental responses or the executed verifications, though they rely on

said documents to contest plaintiff’s Opposition. Thus, the court hereby orders defendants to submit to the court

copies of their supplemental responses including the verifications executed by both defendants Campbell and

Gibson. Defendants Campbell and Gibson are ordered to provide the court with said documents within three (3)

days of the issuance of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CIVIL MINUTES INITIALS OF CRD __pg___

Case 2:06-cv-02404-RJT Document 112 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 1