Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01516/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01516-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTOINE BEALER,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

R. BRANNUM, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:12-cv-01516-AWI-GSA-PC

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

(ECF Nos. 52, 60.)

I. BACKGROUND

Antoine Bealer ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 

with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint 

commencing this action on September 14, 2012. (ECF No. 1.) This case now proceeds on the 

Fourth Amended Complaint filed on March 28, 2014, against defendants Rios and Brannum

(“Defendants”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 

21.) This case is presently in the discovery phase, pursuant to the court’s scheduling order of 

Case 1:12-cv-01516-DAD-EPG Document 97 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

March 2, 2015. (ECF No. 45.) On April 13, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for summary 

judgment which is pending.1 (ECF No. 48.) 

On May 8, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for extension of time to respond to 

Plaintiff’s discovery requests, and on May 22, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for a protective 

order. (ECF No. 52, 60.) Defendants’ motions are now before the court.

II. DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

Defendants request an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests 

until after the court rules on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants argue that 

the extension should be granted because their motion for summary judgment is potentially 

dispositive of all of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants and, if granted in full, could dismiss 

the entire case, which would obviate the necessity for Defendants to provide responses to 

Plaintiff’s discovery. (Sloan Decl., ECF No. 52 at 2 ¶5.)

Defendants also request a protective order to stay all discovery in this matter until the 

court rules on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants assert that Plaintiff has 

requested to take depositions of Defendants, propounded requests for production, and 

propounded interrogatories for all Defendants, and until the court rules on the motion for 

summary judgment, Defendants are unable to determine the permissible scope of discovery.

At this juncture, findings and recommendations have been entered to deny Defendants’ 

motion for summary judgment. Thus, the court’s ruling on the motion for summary judgment 

may not dismiss the case, and discovery would continue as scheduled. In light of the court’s 

anticipated ruling, the court finds no good cause at this stage of the proceedings to grant 

Defendants an extension of time to participate in discovery or a protective order to stay 

discovery. Accordingly, the motions shall be denied.

///

///

 

1 On September 16, 2015, the court entered findings and recommendations, recommending that 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied. (ECF No. 94.) The parties were granted thirty days in 

which to file objections. (Id.) To date, no objections have been filed.

Case 1:12-cv-01516-DAD-EPG Document 97 Filed 09/23/15 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

III. CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ motion for extension of time, filed on May 8, 2015, is DENIED; 

and

2. Defendants’ motion for a protective order, filed on May 22, 2015, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 23, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01516-DAD-EPG Document 97 Filed 09/23/15 Page 3 of 3