Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05387/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05387-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

Case No. C-04-5387 SC and Case No. C-05-01660 SC 

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

RONALD S. KATZ (California Bar No. 085713) 

CHRISTOPHER L. WANGER (California Bar No. 164751) 

RYAN S. HILBERT (California Bar No. 210549) 

1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 

Telephone: (650) 812-1300 

Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 

Attorneys for 

VERITY, INC. 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 

SEAN A. LINCOLN (California Bar No. 136387) 

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (California Bar No. 173985) 

THOMAS J. GRAY (California Bar No. 191411) 

DANIEL J. WEINBERG (California Bar No. 227159) 

1000 Marsh Road, 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 614-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 

DAVID TAUBER (California Bar No. 78385) 

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC. 

500 MACARA AVENUE 

SUNNYVALE, CA 94085 

Telephone: (408) 738-6200 

Facsimile: (408) 738-6203 

Attorneys for 

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC. AND ALPHA LUK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

VERITY, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. C-04-5387 SC 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

DISMISSAL 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 165 Filed 03/10/06 Page 1 of 3
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

Case No. C-04-5387 SC and Case No. C-05-01660 SC 

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

VERITY, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Related Case No. C 05-01660 SC 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Verity, Inc. (“Verity”), Inxight Software, Inc. (“Inxight”), 

and Alpha Luk (“Luk”) (collectively, “the Parties”) by and through their respective counsel of 

record, have entered a confidential settlement agreement settling the above-captioned 

consolidated actions and have agreed to the entry of this Stipulated Order of Dismissal. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Verity and Inxight, through their 

respective counsel of record, that all claims in Case No. 04-05387 are dismissed with prejudice 

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through their respective 

counsel of record, that all claims and counter-claims in Case No. 05-01660 are dismissed with 

prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to 

bear its or his own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

The Parties further stipulate that for the purpose of these voluntary dismissals, no party is 

considered the “prevailing party” within the meaning of Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. 

Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Parties further request that this 

Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement. 

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 165 Filed 03/10/06 Page 2 of 3
MANATT, PHELPS &

PHILLIPS, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

Case No. C-04-5387 SC and Case No. C-05-01660 SC 

Dated: March 9, 2006 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 

By: /s/ Christopher L. Wanger 

Christopher L. Wanger 

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

VERITY, INC. 

Dated: March 9, 2006 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

By: /s/ I. Neel Chatterjee 

I. Neel Chatterjee 

Attorneys for Defendant,

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC. 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures,

Christopher L. Wanger hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained. 

ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________, 2006 ___________________________ 

The Honorable Samuel Conti 

United States District Judge 

20152872.1 

3/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:04-cv-05387-SC Document 165 Filed 03/10/06 Page 3 of 3