Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05042/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05042-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL RENOWITZKY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK N.A, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-05042-JCS 

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE

On June 15, 2016, the Court granted Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first 

amended complaint, but granted Plaintiffs leave to amend no later than July 13, 2016. See dkt. 

50.1 Plaintiffs did not file a second amended complaint by that deadline. After Plaintiff Carl 

Renowitzky filed a request for accommodation of disability and a deficient notice of bankruptcy

stay, the Court on August 5, 2016 ordered Renowitzky to file an amended notice of bankruptcy 

stay with additional relevant information no later than August 22, 2016. See dkt. 52. Plaintiffs did 

not file anything in response to that order.

A case management conference was held on September 2, 2016. Plaintiffs did not file the 

required case management statement in advance of that conference and did not appear at the 

conference. Defendants requested that the case be dismissed with prejudice, but the Court granted 

Plaintiffs an additional two weeks to file a second amended complaint. The Court’s order advised

Plaintiffs that failure to amend their complaint by September 16, 2016 would result in dismissal 

with prejudice. See dkt. 60. That deadline has passed, and Plaintiffs have not filed a second 

/ / /

 

1

The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for all 

purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Case 3:15-cv-05042-JCS Document 63 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

amended complaint. This action is therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is 

instructed to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 19, 2016

______________________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

Chief Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-05042-JCS Document 63 Filed 09/19/16 Page 2 of 2