Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-05391/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-05391-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

** E-filed May 12, 2010 ** 

NOT FOR CITATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MULTIVEN, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California 

corporation, 

 

 Defendant. 

____________________________________ 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

____________________________________/

No. C08-05391 JW (HRL) 

INTERIM ORDER RE: CISCO’S 

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND 

MOTION TO COMPEL 

[Re: Docket Nos. 155, 196] 

Before the court are two motions filed by Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”), currently set for 

May 25, 2010. Upon review of the moving and responding papers, the court finds good cause to 

seek further briefing in advance of the motion hearings. Accordingly, Cisco shall file a 

supplemental letter brief by May 28, 2010, not to exceed four pages, that informs the court whether 

the document production in relation to the May 18–21 depositions in Vancouver, Canada is 

complete—and if not, to what extent the production is incomplete. Plaintiff and counderdefendants 

shall file a response to Cisco’s letter brief, not to exceed four pages, by June 1, 2010. In addition, 

the hearings on both motions are continued to June 15, 2010 at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 12, 2010 

HOWARD R. LLOYD 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:08-cv-05391-JW Document 209 Filed 05/12/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

C08-05391 JW (HRL) Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

Brian Curtis Vanderhoof bvanderhoof@rmkb.com, jcecchini@rmkb.com, kkakiuchi@rmkb.com 

Dan Keith Webb dwebb@winston.com 

Donald Ross Pepperman dpepperman@blechercollins.com, ljaramillo@blechercollins.com 

James C. Potepan jpotepan@ropers.com, aarriola@ropers.com, kkakiuchi@ropers.com, 

 tpierson@ropers.com 

Joseph J. Bial joseph.bial@cwt.com 

Maxwell Michael Blecher mblecher@blechercollins.com 

Michael Sungwoo Kim mkim@rmkb.com, jcecchini@rmkb.com, kkakiuchi@rmkb.com 

Patrick Martin Ryan pryan@winston.com, DocketSF@winston.com, 

 mthomasian@winston.com, ndelich@winston.com, 

 tmontague@winston.com 

Thomas Michael O'Leary toleary@rmkb.com, aarriola@rmkb.com, jcecchini@rmkb.com, 

 kkakiuchi@ropers.com 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not 

registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. 

 

Case 5:08-cv-05391-JW Document 209 Filed 05/12/10 Page 2 of 2