Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03166/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03166-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLINTON WAGNER,

Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-3166 FCD KJN P

vs.

MOSS POSNER, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On April 20, 2010, defendants Schuster and Posner filed a motion to dismiss

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. 

Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written

opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to

the granting of the motion . . . .” On February 17, 2010, plaintiff was advised of the requirements

for filing an opposition to a motion to dismiss and that failure to oppose such a motion may be

deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. 

////

////

////

////

Case 2:09-cv-03166-KJM-KJN Document 29 Filed 05/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, plaintiff’s failure to oppose should be deemed a waiver of

opposition to the granting of the motion. The defendants’ arguments in the motion are well

taken. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the motion to dismiss filed April 20, 2010, on

behalf of defendants Schuster and Posner (Dkt. No. 20) be granted.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 26, 2010

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

wag3166.46

Case 2:09-cv-03166-KJM-KJN Document 29 Filed 05/26/10 Page 2 of 2