Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00474/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00474-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. C 05-00474 MMC (MED) 

LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP 

NICOLA A. PISANO (State Bar No. 151282) 

npisano@luce.com 

Del Mar Gateway, 11988 El Camino Real, Suite 200 

San Diego, California 92130-2594 

Telephone: (858) 720-6320 

Facsimile: (858) 523-4326 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

VALYD, INC. 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

THEODORE T. HERHOLD (State Bar No. 122895) 

ttherhold@townsend.com

MATTHEW R. HULSE (State Bar No. 209490) 

mrhulse@townsend.com 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400 

Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

VALYD, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE 

CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

Case No. C 05-00474 MMC (MED) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE 

COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE 

CORPORATION, 

Counterclaimant, 

v.

VALYD, INC., 

Counterdefendant.

Case 3:05-cv-00474-MMC Document 36 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE - 1 - 

CASE NO. C 05-00474 MMC (MED) 

Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Valyd, Inc. ("Valyd"), through its undersigned counsel, and 

Defendant and Counterclaimant Communication Intelligence Corporation ("CIC"), through its 

undersigned counsel, hereby submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order regarding the case schedule. 

WHEREAS, on September 13, 2005 the parties participated in a court-sponsored mediation; 

WHEREAS, the parties continue to be involved in settlement negotiations; 

WHEREAS, the parties have been exchanging draft settlement agreements—on October 21, 

2005, CIC sent a draft settlement agreement to Valyd; on November 16, 2005, Valyd sent a draft 

settlement agreement to CIC; and, on December 2, 2005, CIC sent a draft settlement agreement to 

Valyd;

WHEREAS, Valyd's technical group is located in Hyderabad, India, and communication 

therewith has introduced some unanticipated delays during the ongoing settlement negotiations; 

WHEREAS, the parties need additional time to attempt to resolve this dispute; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Patent Local Rules and the Court's order filed on November 8, 

2005, upcoming case deadlines are as follows: 

x Last day to file the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement—December 8, 

2005

x Last day to complete claim construction discovery—January 13, 2006 

x Last day for CIC to file an opening claim construction brief and any evidence 

supporting its claim construction—January 27, 2006 

x Last day for Valyd to file a responsive claim construction brief and supporting 

evidence—February 10, 2006 

x Last day for CIC to file a reply brief and any evidence directly rebutting the supporting 

evidence contained in Valyd's response—February 17, 2006 

x Claim Construction Hearing—March 27, 2006 

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation filed by the parties, the Court previously rescheduled the 

deadlines set forth above in an order filed on October 12, 2005; 

WHEREAS, the parties seek approximately a 30-day extension of the deadlines referenced 

above, to allow the parties to focus their efforts on settlement negotiations; 

Case 3:05-cv-00474-MMC Document 36 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE - 2 - 

CASE NO. C 05-00474 MMC (MED) 

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and request that the new deadlines are as follows: 

x Last day to file the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement—January 6, 

2006

x Last day to complete claim construction discovery—February 10, 2006 

x Last day for CIC to file an opening claim construction brief and any evidence 

supporting its claim construction—February 24, 2006 

x Last day for Valyd to file a responsive claim construction brief and supporting 

evidence—March 10, 2006 

x Last day for CIC to file a reply brief and any evidence directly rebutting the supporting 

evidence contained in Valyd's response—March 17, 2006 

x Claim Construction Hearing—April 24, 2006 (or on a later date which is convenient for 

the Court) 

The parties do not seek to reschedule any other case deadlines. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: December 6, 2005 LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP 

By: /S/ Nicola A. Pisano 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

 VALYD, INC. 

DATED: December 6, 2005 TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP 

By: /S/ Matthew R. Hulse 

 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE CORP. 

Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for Plaintiff and 

Counterdefendant, Nicola A. Pisano. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The claim construction hearing is continued 

to April 24, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. 

DATED: December 7, 2005 

 

 MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:05-cv-00474-MMC Document 36 Filed 12/07/05 Page 3 of 3