Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01150/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-01150-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; 

ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: service@moorelawfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jose Acosta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ACOSTA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FAST N ESY II, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-cv-01150-LJO-SAB

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF 

HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

TO DISMISS; ORDER

Current Hearing Date: December 29, 2016

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Courtroom: 4

Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill

WHEREAS, Defendants, Fast N Esy II, Inc. dba Fast N Esy #21, Vinay Vohra, and 

Vikram Vohra (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff Jose Acosta, “the Parties”), have filed 

a Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Dkt. 16; the “Motion”), 

which is set for hearing on December 29, 2016;

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff will be unavailable on the scheduled hearing date due 

to a previously planned vacation, and will be in a remote location where he does not expect to 

have sufficient cell phone reception to allow a telephonic appearance;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to 

continue the hearing of the Motion by one week to January 5, 2017.

Case 1:16-cv-01150-LJO-SAB Document 19 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; 

ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: November 30, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Zachary M. Best 

Zachary M. Best

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

Jose Acosta

Dated: November 30, 2016 THORNTON DAVIDSON, P.C.

/s/ Thornton Davidson

 Thornton Davidson

Attorney for Defendants,

Fast N Esy II, Inc. dba Fast N Esy #21, 

Vinay Vohra, and Vikram Vohra

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Dkt. 16) currently set for December 29, 

2016 is continued to January 5, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4, 7th Floor, before Chief 

District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 30, 2016 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-01150-LJO-SAB Document 19 Filed 11/30/16 Page 2 of 2