Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-06275/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-06275-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29449458.1 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

[Stipulating parties listed on signature page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

)

)

)

Case No. 07-5944 JST

MDL No. 1917

This Document Relates to:

Interbond Corp. of Am. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al.,

No. 3:11-cv-06275

Interbond Corp. of America v. Technicolor SA, 

et al., No. 3:13-cv-05727

Office Depot, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al, No.

3:11-cv-06276

Office Depot, Inc. v. Technicolor SA, et al., No. 

3:13-cv-05726

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs Interbond Corporation of America (“BrandsMart”) and Office Depot, Inc. (“Office 

Depot”) (collectively, “Stipulating Plaintiffs”), and the undersigned Defendants, by their respective 

attorneys and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, state as follows:

1. On October 3, 2013, BrandsMart filed its First Amended Complaint in No. 3:11-cv06275 (MDL Dkt. No. 1974), asserting claims for relief against the undersigned Defendants except 

Technicolor SA, Technicolor USA, Inc., Videocon Industries, Ltd., Technologies Displays Americas 

LLC, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc., and 

Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. under the Sherman Act and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade 

Practices Act.

2. On December 20, 2013, BrandsMart filed its First Amended Complaint in No. 3:13-

cv-05727, asserting claims for relief against Technicolor SA, Technicolor USA, Inc., Videocon 

Industries, Ltd., Technologies Displays Americas LLC, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi 

Case 3:11-cv-06275-JST Document 105 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29449458.1 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc., and Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. (MDL Dkt. No. 2279-6) 

under the Sherman Act and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

3. On October 3, 2013, Office Depot filed its First Amended Complaint in No. 3:11-cv06276 (MDL Dkt. No. 1977), asserting claims for relief against the undersigned Defendants except 

Technicolor SA, Technicolor USA, Inc., Videocon Industries, Ltd., Technologies Displays Americas 

LLC, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc., and 

Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. under the Sherman Act and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade 

Practices Act. The claims asserted in this complaint by Office Depot under the California 

Cartwright Act and California Unfair Competition Laws were voluntarily withdrawn on December 

19, 2014 (MDL Dkt. No. 3226).

4. On December 20, 2013, Office Depot filed its First Amended Complaint in No. 3:13-

cv-05726, asserting claims for relief against Technicolor SA, Technicolor USA, Inc., Videocon 

Industries, Ltd., Technologies Displays Americas LLC, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi 

Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc., and Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. (MDL Dkt. No. 2279-8) 

asserting claims for relief under the Sherman Act and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade 

Practices Act. The claims asserted in this complaint by Office Depot under the California 

Cartwright Act and California Unfair Competition Laws were voluntarily withdrawn on December 

19, 2014 (MDL Dkt. No. 3226).

5. Stipulating Plaintiffs now desire to dismiss with prejudice their claims against 

Defendants under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. Stipulating Plaintiffs have 

already dismissed with prejudice their claims against Defendants under all other state laws outlined 

in paragraphs 1-4 above. Stipulating Plaintiffs are not dismissing, and will continue to prosecute, all 

claims against Defendants brought pursuant to federal law, including the Sherman Act and the 

Clayton Act.

6. Stipulating Plaintiffs and Defendants agree that each party shall bear its own costs 

and attorneys’ fees in connection with the dismissed claims.

Case 3:11-cv-06275-JST Document 105 Filed 01/25/16 Page 2 of 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29449458.1 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

7. As a result of the dismissals of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act

claims with prejudice, and contingent upon the Court’s approval of this Stipulation, Defendants will 

withdraw certain pending summary judgment motions, in whole or in part, as follows:

a. Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as 

to Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ and Certain Direct Action Plaintiffs’ State Law 

Claims on Statute of Limitations Grounds (MDL Dkt. No. 2978) is withdrawn in its 

entirety, as BrandsMart and Office Depot’s Florida state law claims were the last live 

claims subject to the motion.

b. Defendants’ Joint Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment Against Certain Direct Action Plaintiffs on State Law Claims Limited to 

Intrastate Activity (MDL Dkt. No. 3031) is withdrawn in its entirety, as BrandsMart 

and Office Depot’s Florida state law claims were the last live claims subject to the 

motion.

c. Defendant Technologies Displays Americas LLC’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment (MDL Dkt. No. 2984) is withdrawn as to Stipulating Plaintiffs’ claims 

under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, but continues to apply to 

all other claims and Plaintiffs addressed in the motion not dismissed by previous 

stipulation.

d. Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on 

Plaintiffs’ Indirect Purchaser Claims Based on Foreign Sales (MDL Dkt. No. 3006) is 

withdrawn as to Stipulating Plaintiffs’ claims under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair 

Trade Practices Act, but continues to apply to all other claims and Plaintiffs addressed 

in the motion not dismissed by previous stipulation.

e. Defendants’ Joint Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment 

Based Upon Plaintiffs’ Failure to Distinguish Between Actionable and NonActionable Damages Under the FTAIA (MDL Dkt. No. 3008) is withdrawn as to 

Stipulating Plaintiffs’ claims under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices 

Case 3:11-cv-06275-JST Document 105 Filed 01/25/16 Page 3 of 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29449458.1 4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Act, but continues to apply to all other claims and Plaintiffs addressed in the motion 

not dismissed by previous stipulation.

f. Any other motion that seeks to dismiss any of the Stipulating Plaintiffs’ 

Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act claims referenced in Paragraph 1-4

is withdrawn as to those claims, but continues to apply to all other claims and 

Plaintiffs addressed in the motion not dismissed by previous stipulation.

8. As set out in subparagraphs (a) and (b) of the preceding paragraph, this stipulation 

will moot two of the summary judgment motions (MDL Dkt. Nos. 2978 and 3031) currently 

scheduled for oral argument on March 7, 2016. See MDL Dkt. No. 4253. Accordingly, the parties 

respectfully request that the oral argument scheduled for those motions be cancelled. This 

stipulation will not moot the remaining oral arguments scheduled for that day (MDL Dkt. Nos. 2973, 

2997, and 3029).

9. This stipulation and the Court’s order thereon shall have no bearing on the 

applicability of the aforementioned motions in the cases of Plaintiffs other than the Stipulating 

Plaintiffs.

WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that the Stipulating Plaintiffs’ Florida 

Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act claims are dismissed with prejudice. This dismissal does 

not apply to the claims of Stipulating Plaintiffs brought under federal law (including the Sherman

Act and the Clayton Act).

WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that the summary judgment motions brought 

by Defendants in MDL Dkt. Nos. 2978 and 3031 are withdrawn in their entirety. 

* * *

The undersigned parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this stipulation 

as an order.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 25, 2016 ___________________________________

Hon. Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge 

Case 3:11-cv-06275-JST Document 105 Filed 01/25/16 Page 4 of 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29449458.1 5

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from each of the below signatories.

Dated: January 25, 2016 /s/ Philip J. Iovieno

Philip J. Iovieno 

Anne M. Nardacci

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

30 South Pearl Street, 11th Floor

Albany, NY 12207

Telephone: (518) 434-0600

Facsimile: (518) 434-0665

Email: piovieno@bsfllp.com

 anardacci@bsfllp.com

William A. Isaacson 

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800

Washington, D.C. 20015

Telephone: (202) 237-2727

Facsimile: (202) 237-6131

Email: wisaacson@bsfllp.com

Stuart Singer

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (954) 356-0011

Facsimile: (954) 356-0022

Email: ssinger@bsfllp.com

Liaison Counsel for Direct Action Plaintiffs 

and Attorneys for Plaintiffs Interbond 

Corporation of America and Office Depot, Inc.

Case 3:11-cv-06275-JST Document 105 Filed 01/25/16 Page 5 of 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29449458.1 6

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

DATED: January 25, 2016 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

By: /s/ Brad D. Brian

BRAD D. BRIAN (SBN 079001)

brad.brian@mto.com

GREGORY J. WEINGART (SBN 157997)

gregory.weingart@mto.com

SUSAN E. NASH (SBN 101837)

susan.nash@mto.com 

E. MARTIN ESTRADA (SBN 223802)

martin.estrada@mto.com

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560

Telephone: (213) 683-9100

Facsimile: (213) 687-3702

Attorneys for Defendant LG Electronics, Inc.

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Kessler

JEFFREY L. KESSLER (pro hac vice)

JKessler@winston.com

A. PAUL VICTOR (pro hac vice)

PVictor@winston.com

ALDO A. BADINI (SBN 257086)

ABadini@winston.com

EVA W. COLE (pro hac vice)

EWCole@winston.com

MOLLY M. DONOVAN

MMDonovan@winston.com

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

200 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10166

Telephone: (212) 294-6700

Facsimile: (212) 294-4700

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

STEVEN A. REISS (pro hac vice)

steven.reiss@weil.com

DAVID L. YOHAI (pro hac vice)

david.yohai@weil.com

ADAM C. HEMLOCK (pro hac vice)

adam.hemlock@weil.com

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10153-0119

Telephone: (212) 310-8000

Facsimile: (212) 310-8007

Case 3:11-cv-06275-JST Document 105 Filed 01/25/16 Page 6 of 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29449458.1 7

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Attorneys for Defendants Panasonic Corporation 

(f/k/a Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.), 

Panasonic Corporation of North America, MT 

Picture Display Co., Ltd.

By: /s/ Lucius B. Lau

CHRISTOPHER M. CURRAN (pro hac vice)

ccurran@whitecase.com

LUCIUS B. LAU (pro hac vice)

alau@whitecase.com

DANA E. FOSTER (pro hac vice)

defoster@whitecase.com

WHITE & CASE LLP

701 Thirteenth Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20005

Telephone: (202) 626-3600

Facsimile: (202) 639-9355

Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, 

Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America 

Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America 

Consumer Products, L.L.C., and Toshiba America 

Electronic Components, Inc.

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON 

LLP

By: /s/ Gary L. Halling

GARY L. HALLING (SBN 66087)

ghalling@sheppardmullin.com

JAMES L. MCGINNIS (SBN 95788)

jmcginnis@sheppardmullin.com

MICHAEL W. SCARBOROUGH (SBN 203524)

mscarborough@sheppardmullin.com

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & 

HAMPTON LLP

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 434-9100

Facsimile: (415) 434-3947

Attorneys for Defendants Samsung SDI America, 

Inc.; Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.; Samsung SDI 

(Malaysia) SDN. BHD.; Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. 

DE C.V.; Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda.; Shenzen 

Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI 

Co., Ltd.

Case 3:11-cv-06275-JST Document 105 Filed 01/25/16 Page 7 of 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29449458.1 8

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BAKER BOTTS LLP

By: /s/ John M. Taladay

JOHN M. TALADAY (pro hac vice)

john.taladay@bakerbotts.com

ERIK T. KOONS (pro hac vice)

erik.koons@bakerbotts.com

CHARLES M. MALAISE (pro hac vice)

charles.malaise@bakerbotts.com

BAKER BOTTS LLP

1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, DC 20004-2400

Telephone: (202) 639-7700

Facsimile: (202) 639-7890

JON V. SWENSON (SBN 233054)

jon.swenson@bakerbotts.com

BAKER BOTTS LLP

1001 Page Mill Road

Building One, Suite 200

Palo Alto, CA 94304

Telephone: (650) 739-7500

Facsimile: (650) 739-7699

E-mail: jon.swenson@bakerbotts.com

Attorneys for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V., 

Philips Electronics North America Corporation, 

Philips Taiwan Ltd., and Philips do Brasil, Ltda.

JENNER & BLOCK LLP

By: /s/ Terrence J. Truax

JENNER & BLOCK LLP

Terrence J. Truax (pro hac vice)

Michael T. Brody (pro hac vice)

353 North Clark Street

Chicago, Illinois 60654-3456

Telephone: (312) 222-9350

Facsimile: (312) 527-0484

ttruax@jenner.com

mbrody@jenner.com

Brent Caslin (SBN 198682)

JENNER & BLOCK LLP

633 West Fifth Street, Suite 3600

Los Angeles, California 90071

Telephone: (213) 239-5100

Case 3:11-cv-06275-JST Document 105 Filed 01/25/16 Page 8 of 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29449458.1 9

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Facsimile: (213) 239-5199

bcaslin@jenner.com

Harold A. Barza (Cal. Bar 208444)

halbarza@quinnemanuel.com

Kevin Y. Teruya (Cal. Bar No. 235916)

kevinteruya@auinnemanuel.com

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, 

LLP

865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Floor

Los Angeles, California 90017-2543

Ryan S. Goldstein (Cal. Bar No. 208444)

QUINN EMANUEL URGUHART & SULLIVAN, 

LLP

ryan.goldstein@quinnemanuel.com

NBF Hibiya Building, 25F

1-1-7, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku

Tokyo 100-0011, Japan

Telephone: +81 3 5510 1711

Facsimile: +81 3 5510 1712

Attorneys for Defendants Mitsubishi Electric 

Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. and, 

Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc.

FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP

By: /s/ Kathy L. Osborn

Kathy L. Osborn (pro hac vice)

Ryan M. Hurley (pro hac vice)

FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP

300 N. Meridian Street, Suite 2700

Indianapolis, IN 46204

Telephone: (317) 237-0300

Facsimile: (317) 237-1000

kathy.osborn@FaegreBD.com 

ryan.hurley@FaegreBD.com 

Jeffrey S. Roberts (pro hac vice)

Email: jeff.roberts@FaegreBD.com

FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP

3200 Wells Fargo Center

1700 Lincoln Street

Denver, CO 80203

Telephone: (303) 607-3500

Facsimile: (303) 607-3600

Attorneys for Defendants Thomson SA and 

Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. 

SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP

Case 3:11-cv-06275-JST Document 105 Filed 01/25/16 Page 9 of 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29449458.1 10

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

By: /s/ Nathan Lane, III

Nathan Lane, III (SBN 50961)

Mark C. Dosker (SBN 114789)

SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2600

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 954-0200

Facsimile: (415) 393-9887

E-mail: nathan.lane@squiresanders.com

E-mail: mark.dosker@squiresanders.com

Donald A. Wall (Pro Hac Vice)

SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP

1 East Washington Street, Suite 2700

Phoenix, Arizona 85004

Telephone: (602) 528-4005

Facsimile: (602) 253-8129

Email: donald.wall@squirepb.com

Attorneys for Defendant Technologies Displays 

Americas LLC with respect to all cases except Office 

Depot, Inc. v. Technicolor SA, et al. and Sears, 

Roebuck and Co., et al. v. Technicolor SA, et al.

CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, COLT & MOSLE 

LLP

By: /s/ Jeffrey I. Zuckerman

Jeffrey I. Zuckerman (Pro Hac Vice) 

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20006

Telephone: (202 452-7350

Facsimile: (917) 368-7350

Email: jzuckerman@curtis.com

Arthur Gaus (SBN 289560)

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP

601 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, California 94108

Telephone: (415) 397-2700

Facsimile: (415) 397-3300

Email: asg@dillinghammurphy.com

Attorneys for Defendant Technologies Displays 

Americas LLC with respect to Office Depot, Inc. v. 

Technicolor SA, et al. and Sears, Roebuck and Co., 

et al. v. Technicolor SA, et al.

Case 3:11-cv-06275-JST Document 105 Filed 01/25/16 Page 10 of 11
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29449458.1 11

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Case 3:11-cv-06275-JST Document 105 Filed 01/25/16 Page 11 of 11