Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01179/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01179-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARREN KENT COLEMAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1179 MCE KJM P

vs.

ASU STAFF,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed October 17, 2006, plaintiff was granted thirty days within which to

file a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The

thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint, an application to

proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:06-cv-01179-MCE -KJM Document 6 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 19, 2007. 

/mp

cole1179.ftafifphc

Case 2:06-cv-01179-MCE -KJM Document 6 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 2