Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01264/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01264-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE MARTINEZ, 1:05-CV-01264-AWI-WMW-P

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS

 AND RECOMMENDATION OF

vs. AUGUST 1, 2006 

[Document #11]

MATTHEW KRAMER, et al.,

 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Document #10] 

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND 

COPY OF COURT’S PREVIOUS ORDER

TO PLAINTIFF

 / [Document #9]

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. On June 21, 2006, the court issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for

failure to state a claim and directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. The

thirty days passed, and plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. As a result, on August 1,

2006, Magistrate William M. Wunderlich submitted findings and a recommendation to United

States District Judge Anthony W. Ishii to dismiss plaintiff’s case for failure to state a claim.

A review of plaintiff’s file shows that on July 26, 2006, plaintiff submitted an

untimely motion for extension of time to amend his complaint. Plaintiff requested the extension

Case 1:05-cv-01264-LJO-WMW Document 14 Filed 08/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2

because he did not receive the court’s order of June 21, 2006, in time to comply with the order, due

to mail delays caused by his change of address. Plaintiff is hereby informed that it is his

responsibility to apprise the court of his current address so that he receives all court decisions that

may affect the status of his case. See Local Rule 83-183(b). It appears that plaintiff did not inform

the court of his new address in a timely manner. Nevertheless, in light of the fact that plaintiff has

now notified the court of his current address, and good cause appearing, the findings and

recommendation of August 1, 2006, shall be vacated, and the extension of time shall be granted. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation order of August 1, 2006, is VACATED in

its entirety; 

2. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is GRANTED. Plaintiff is

granted an extension of time until thirty days from the date of service of this

order in which to file an amended complaint, pursuant to the court’s order of

June 21, 2006; and

3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send to plaintiff a copy of the court’s previous

order of June 21, 2006 [Document #9].

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 24, 2006 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

j14hj0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01264-LJO-WMW Document 14 Filed 08/25/06 Page 2 of 2