Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02186/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-02186-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

MINUTES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Anthony Charles Fritz v. Dora B. Schriro, et al.

THE HONORABLE JOHN W. SEDWICK CASE NO. 2:06-cv-02186-JWS

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER FROM CHAMBERS Date: March 29, 2007

In a report at docket 13, Magistrate Judge Aspey has recommended that the

petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied as untimely under the one-year statute of

limitation contained in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, commonly

called "AEDPA." Petitioner has filed objections at dockets 14 and has also filed a

request for an evidentiary hearing or conference at docket 15. Respondents filed a

reply at docket 16. For the reasons articulated in the reply at docket 16, the request for

an evidentiary hearing will be denied.

This court reviews recommendation from the magistrate judge in habeas cases

according to the following standard: All recommended conclusions of law and all

recommended findings of fact as to which an objection has been taken are reviewed de

novo; while all other recommended findings of fact are reviewed for clear error. This

court has applied that standard to the review of this matter. Having done so, this court

concludes that Judge Aspey's recommendation is correct in all material respects. It is

clear that the petition in this case is untimely under AEDPA.

For the reasons above, the motion at docket 15 is DENIED, the report at docket

13 is ACCEPTED, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk

will please enter judgment which dismisses this case with prejudice.

 

Case 2:06-cv-02186-JWS Document 18 Filed 03/30/07 Page 1 of 1