Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_18-cv-07355/USCOURTS-cand-5_18-cv-07355-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SCOTT JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

AN PHUONG, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.18-cv-07355-VKD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE 

SETTLEMENT

The Court having been informed that the parties have settled the dispute between them, all 

previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are VACATED. 

On or before May 21, 2019, plaintiff Scott Johnson and defendants Lorraine Tamayo and 

Enrique Olmos Tejeda shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii). 

Rule 41(a)(1) permits a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss a case without a court order (i) by notice if 

the defendant has not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment, or (ii) by stipulation 

signed by all parties who have appeared. Because Ms. Tamayo and Mr. Tejeda have filed an 

answer, they and Mr. Johnson must file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii). 

On or before May 21, 2019, Mr. Johnson shall file a voluntary dismissal of his claims 

against defendant An Phuong, LLC (“An Phuong”) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(i). Rule 

41(a)(1) permits a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss a case without a court order (i) by notice if the 

defendants have not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment, or (ii) by stipulation signed 

by all parties who have appeared. Because An Phuong has not yet appeared or responded to the 

complaint, Mr. Johnson must file a notice of dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(i).

If dismissals are not filed by the specified date, then the parties shall appear in Courtroom 

2, Fifth Floor, 280 South First Street, California on June 4, 2019, 10:00 a.m. and show cause, if 

Case 5:18-cv-07355-VKD Document 16 Filed 03/22/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Additionally, the 

parties shall file a statement in response to this Order to Show Cause no later than May 28, 2019 

advising as to (1) the status of their activities in finalizing settlement; and (2) how much additional 

time, if any, is requested to finalize the settlement and file the dismissal. If a dismissal is filed as 

ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated and the parties need not 

file a statement in response to this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 22, 2019

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:18-cv-07355-VKD Document 16 Filed 03/22/19 Page 2 of 2