Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06720/USCOURTS-caed-1_99-cv-06720-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH G. KEEL, 

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

R. E. YSALVA, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

NO. 1:99-cv-06720-AWI-SMS-PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

(Doc. 102)

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 92)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

302.

On June 30, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) be denied. The parties were provided an opportunity to file

objections within thirty days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been

filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Case 1:99-cv-06720-AWI -SMS Document 104 Filed 08/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on June 30, 2010,

are adopted in full;

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) is denied; and

3. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 24, 2010 

0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2

Case 1:99-cv-06720-AWI -SMS Document 104 Filed 08/25/10 Page 2 of 2