Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01590/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01590-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act

---

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01590-HSG

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TOM VILSACK, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:15-cv-1590-HSG

ORDER ON JOINT PROPOSED 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

PURSUANT TO STPIULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

The following schedule governs the production of the Administrative Record in this case: 

Defendants’ production of the Administrative Record On or before December 

5, 2016

Plaintiffs’ motion to challenge the completeness of 

the Administrative Record, if any

On or before January 20, 

2017

Should Plaintiffs decide to file a motion to challenge the completeness of the Administrative 

Record, Civil Local Rule 7 should govern the form, length, and timing of the motion, as well as 

any opposition, and reply associated with that motion. 

If there are no issues regarding the scope of the Administrative Record and no motion 

practice regarding the scope of the Administrative Record is necessary, the following briefing 

schedule will govern the cross-motions for summary judgment in this case: 

Case 4:15-cv-01590-HSG Document 66 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-01590-HSG

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment On or before February 

20, 2017

Defendants’ opposition and cross-motion for 

summary judgment

On or before March 23, 

2017

Plaintiffs’ opposition and reply On or before April 6, 

2017

Defendants’ reply On or before April 20, 

2017

For Defendants’ opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment, Defendants may 

file a consolidated brief not to exceed fifty (50) pages. For Plaintiffs’ opposition and reply, 

Plaintiffs may file a consolidated brief not to exceed forty (40) pages. 

If Plaintiffs file a motion to challenge the completeness of the Administrative Record on 

or before January 20, 2016, the above briefing schedule for cross-motions for summary judgment 

will be suspended, and the parties shall submit a new briefing schedule for cross-motions for 

summary judgment within seven days of the Court’s ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion challenging the 

completeness of the Administrative Record.

Dated: November 3, 2016 _____________________________

Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

U.S. District Court Judge

Case 4:15-cv-01590-HSG Document 66 Filed 11/03/16 Page 2 of 2