Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00144/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00144-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley

A Professional Corporation

San Jose

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RC1/5531843.1/LMV

Stip. to Continue Hearing Date on Mot. For Prelim. 

Injunction; [Proposed] Order 

Case No. C10 00144 CRB (ADR)

MICHAEL J. IOANNOU (SBN 95208)

mioannou@rmkb.com

LITA M. VERRIER (SBN 181183)

lverrier@rmkb.com

LAEL D. ANDARA (SBN 215416)

landara@rmkb.com

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

50 W. San Fernando St., #1400

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone: (408) 287-6262

Facsimile: (408) 918-4501

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, 

INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

DIDAR ISLAM aka MOHAMMED 

DIDARUL ISLAM, an individual, 

POWER IC LTD., an Indian company, HIP 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a California 

corporation aka HIP SEMICONDUCTOR,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C10 00144 CRB (ADR)

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE 

HEARING DATE OF MAXIM

INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.’S 

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, that the hearing on 

Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, presently scheduled for 

April 2, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8 of the above-entitled court, be extended for a period 

of at least thirty (30) days or the Court’s closest available date.

IT IS ALSO STIPULATED that Defendants, and each of them, shall remove all 

references to any Maxim trademarks Maxim, MAXQ, uMAX, including MAX alone or in 

combination with any numbered products and any accompanying datasheets from their respective 

websites, and that all advertising, manufacturing, distribution, importation, and sales of any 

Case 3:10-cv-00144-CRB Document 38 Filed 03/25/10 Page 1 of 3
Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley

A Professional Corporation

San Jose

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RC1/5531843.1/LMV - 2 -

Stip. to Continue Hearing Date on Mot. For Prelim. 

Injunction; [Proposed] Order 

Case No. C10 00144 CRB (ADR)

defendants’ products using or marked in any way with Maxim trademarks Maxim, MAXQ, 

uMAX, including the mark MAX alone or in combination with any numbered products and any

accompanying datasheets shall cease pending this Court’s Order on the hearing for Preliminary

Injunction.

Good cause exists for the continuance of the hearing as the parties are involved in 

settlement negotiations. 

Dated: March 24, 2010 ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

By: s/Michael J. Ioannou

MICHAEL J. IOANNOU

LITA M. VERRIER

Attorneys for Plaintiff MAXIM 

INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.

Dated: March ____, 2010 POWER IC LTD.

By:

DIDAR ISLAM

President and CEO

For Defendant POWER IC. LTD

Dated: March ____, 2010

By:

DIDAR ISLAM

Defendant

Dated: March ____, 2010 HIP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

By:

AZZAM A. ABDO

President

For Defendant HIP TECHNOLOGIES, 

INC.

Case 3:10-cv-00144-CRB Document 38 Filed 03/25/10 Page 2 of 3
Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley

A Professional Corporation

San Jose

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RC1/5531843.1/LMV - 3 -

Stip. to Continue Hearing Date on Mot. For Prelim. 

Injunction; [Proposed] Order 

Case No. C10 00144 CRB (ADR)

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing on Maxim 

Integrated Products, Inc.’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is continued from April 2, 2010, to 

_____________________________, at 10:00 a.m.

_________________________________________

JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

May 7, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:10-cv-00144-CRB Document 38 Filed 03/25/10 Page 3 of 3