Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06572/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06572-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 On M ay 19, 2005, plaintiff’s free exercise, equal protection, inmate appeals process, supervisory liability,

ADA, and RLUIPA claims were dismissed from this action, without prejudice, for failure to state any claims upon

which relief may be granted; and defendants Lewis, Salazar, Ward, Rianda, Villa, Kim, Priolo, Hollis, and Bonilla

were dismissed from this action based on plaintiff’s failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted

against them. (Doc. 80.) 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYNE PARKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GAIL LEWIS, WARDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. CV-F-02-6572 OWW LJO P

ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

APPROPRIATE, AND FORWARDING

SERVICE OF PROCESS DOCUMENTS TO

PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND

RETURN

(Docs. 1 and 80)

Plaintiff Wayne Parks (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on December 9,

2002. The court has screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and finds that it

appears to state cognizable claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Klarich,

Neubarth, and Young for violating the Eighth Amendment with respect to plaintiff’s medical and

dental care.1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

J. D. KLARICH, M.D., CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER

JEFF NEUBARTH, M.D.

W. YOUNG, CHIEF DENTAL OFFICER

Case 1:02-cv-06572-OWW -LJO Document 83 Filed 05/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff three (3) USM-285 forms, three (3)

summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the complaint filed December 9, 2002.

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Four (4) copies of the endorsed complaint filed December 9, 2002. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06572-OWW -LJO Document 83 Filed 05/23/05 Page 2 of 2