Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00381/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00381-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAMAR KARCHE ADDISON,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR 

COURT, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-0381 WBS KJN P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed September 3, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. (ECF No. 11.) On October 1, 2015, plaintiff 

was granted an additional sixty days in which to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 15.) Sixty

days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or 

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

Case 2:15-cv-00381-WBS-KJN Document 16 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: April 7, 2016

/addi0381.fta.ext

Case 2:15-cv-00381-WBS-KJN Document 16 Filed 04/07/16 Page 2 of 2