Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-3_13-cv-00071/USCOURTS-ared-3_13-cv-00071-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

JONESBORO DIVISION 

CRYSTAL GANN 

v. No. 3:13-cv-71-DPM 

PLAINTIFF 

HOUSEHOLD LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY DEFENDANT 

ORDER 

Gann's motion for reconsideration, NQ 109, is denied. First, Gann makes 

a new argument, which is not properly asserted at this point because it was 

available before. Second, Gann relies on the faulty premise that the Court 

held that the policy was rescinded. It did not. The Court stated, as a matter 

of fact, that Household Life sent Gann the premiums that Ms. Griffin had paid 

instead of the policy proceeds. NQ 107 at 2. The Court held that Household 

Life was entitled to rescind under the statute, not that rescission had occurred. 

Finally, Household Life did not waive its statutory misrepresentation defense; 

nor were its rescission efforts improper. No good reason to reconsider the 

merits decision is presented by Gann' s post-judgment motion. The Court 

appreciates Household Life's expedited response. 

Case 3:13-cv-00071-DPM Document 112 Filed 04/17/15 Page 1 of 2
So Ordered. 

D .P. Marshall Jr.' 

United States District Judge 

J?~:;...01~ 

-2-

Case 3:13-cv-00071-DPM Document 112 Filed 04/17/15 Page 2 of 2