Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04470/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04470-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 

STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO TRANSFER AND

MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04470-RS 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MICHAEL MACARAEG, on Behalf of 

Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and 

as Private Attorney General, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ABM SECURITY SERVICES, INC., a 

California Corporation; ABM ONSITE 

SERVICES – WEST, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04470-RS 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER 

SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

MOTION TO TRANSFER AND MOTION 

TO DISMISS 

ACTION FILED: May 1, 2015 

ASSIGNED TO: Hon. Richard Seeborg 

 

Case 3:15-cv-04470-RS Document 18 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5 

STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO TRANSFER AND

MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04470-RS 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

On November 20, 2015, Plaintiff Michael Macaraeg (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants ABM 

Security Services, Inc. and ABM Onsite Services – West, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a 

stipulated request to extend and modify certain deadlines associated with anticipated motion practice. 

Good cause appearing, the Court sets the following deadlines follows: 

ACTION DEADLINE 

Defendant to File Motion to Transfer Thursday, December 17, 2015 

Plaintiff to File Opposition to Motion to Transfer Thursday, January 14, 2016 

Defendant to File Reply in Support of Motion to Transfer Thursday, January 28, 2016 

Hearing on Motion to Transfer February 25, 2016 

Defendants to File Motion to Dismiss 14 calendar days from date of Court’s 

ruling on Motion to Transfer 

Plaintiff to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 21 calendar days from date of filing of 

Motion to Dismiss 

Defendants to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss 14 calendar days from date of filing of 

Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 

Hearing on Motion to Dismiss First Available Hearing Date after 14 

calendar days from date of filing of 

Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________, 2015 ___________________________________ 

 The Honorable Richard Seeborg 

 U.S. District Judge

 

11/23

Case 3:15-cv-04470-RS Document 18 Filed 11/23/15 Page 2 of 2