Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01389/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01389-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

ROLLAND HANLEY, )

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

ARROYO, et. al., )

) 

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 06-1389 OWW DLB P 

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM 285 FORMS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights

amended complaint filed on June 26, 2007. The amended complaint appears to a cognizable claims

for relief for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment against defendant Arroyo and for

deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment against

defendant Wilson. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for defendants Arroyo and Wilson.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff two (2) USM-285 forms, two (2)

summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a

copy of the amended complaint filed June 26, 2007.

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall complete the

Case 1:06-cv-01389-OWW -DLB Document 22 Filed 10/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 2

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the

Court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Three (3) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed June 26, 2007.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this Order will result in a Recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 19, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01389-OWW -DLB Document 22 Filed 10/19/07 Page 2 of 2