Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00799/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00799-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

COURT DEADLINES

Case No. 3:15-CV-00799-JSW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

MELINDA S. RIECHERT, BAR NO. 65504

SACHA M. STEENHOEK, BAR NO. 253743

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

One Market, Spear Street Tower

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126

Tel: +1.415.442.1000

Fax: +1.415.442.1001

e-mail: mriechert@morganlewis.com

e-mail: ssteenhoek@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant

IGATE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

JOSEPH CLAPP, Bar No. 99194

AIMAN-SMITH & MARCY

7767 Oakport Street, Suite 1150

Oakland, CA 94621

Tel: 510.590.7115

Fax: 510.562.6830

e-mail: djc.asm@gmail.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

BARBARA WOOD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARBARA WOOD,

Plaintiff,

v.

IGATE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a business entity,

form unknown; and Does 1 through 25, inclusive,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-00799-JSW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s August 17, 2015 Order (Docket No. 48), the Court

set deadlines for the close of expert and non-expert discovery, dispositive motions, and trial;

WHEREAS, the parties have been engaged in discovery, but because of confidentiality

agreements with third parties and for reasons beyond Defendant’s control, Defendant has only

very recently been able to produce to Plaintiff key documents and information critical to this case;

Case 4:15-cv-00799-JSW Document 57 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 4 Case 4:15-cv-00799-JSW Document 58 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

COURT DEADLINES

Case No. 3:15-CV-00799-JSW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

WHEREAS, since the parties began discovery, the Defense has worked diligently to

secure permission to produce such key documents and information, and obtained permission to

produce it on Monday, February 8;

WHEREAS, the parties have not been able to conduct meaningful depositions without

access to these key documents and information;

WHEREAS, now that Defendant has been able to produce the key documents and

information, the parties have scheduled necessary depositions for the last week of February and

first two weeks of March, 2016;

WHEREAS, the parties believe that an extension of the current case deadlines are

necessary to conduct meaningful discovery on one of the most critical issues in this matter.

THEREFORE, for good cause showing, the parties request that the Court amend the

previously-scheduled deadlines as follows:

Close of Non-expert Discovery: March 31, 2016

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

DATED: February 19, 2016 /s/ Joseph Clapp

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: February 19, 2015 /s/ Sacha Steenhoek

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 4:15-cv-00799-JSW Document 57 Filed 02/19/16 Page 2 of 4 Case 4:15-cv-00799-JSW Document 58 Filed 02/22/16 Page 2 of 3
4

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

COURT DEADLINES

Case No. 3:15-CV-00799-JSW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

DB2/ 28135988

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, and having shown good cause, the case deadlines are

extended as follows:

Close of Non-expert Discovery: March 31, 2016

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________

HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:15-cv-00799-JSW Document 57 Filed 02/19/16 Page 4 of 4

February 22, 2016

Case 4:15-cv-00799-JSW Document 58 Filed 02/22/16 Page 3 of 3