Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05821/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05821-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

 NO. 3:16-cv-05821-VC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GOOGLE INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INFOGATION CORP., 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No.: 3:16-cv-05821-VC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFING ON INFOGATION’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

Hon. Judge Vince Chhabria 

Courtroom 4, 17th Floor 

Hearing Date: January 5, 2017 

Time: 10:00 am 

Case 3:16-cv-05821-VC Document 33 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 5
- 1 - STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

 NO. 3:16-cv-05821-VC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Plaintiff Google Inc. (“Google”) and defendant InfoGation Corp. (“InfoGation”) agree 

and stipulate that: 

1. On November 9, 2016, Defendant InfoGation Corp. (“InfoGation”) filed a Motion 

to Dismiss the Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction (“Motion to Dismiss”); 

2. On November 30, 2016, Google Inc. (“Google”) filed an Opposition to 

InfoGation’s Motion to Dismiss (“Opposition”); 

3. On December 7, 2016, InfoGation filed a Reply in Support of its Motion to 

Dismiss (“Reply”); 

4. There have been two developments since the submission of these briefs that may 

have bearing on the court’s decision on the Motion to Dismiss. 

5. First, in the cases proceeding between InfoGation, as plaintiff, and three 

smartphone manufacturers, HTC, ZTE, and Huawei, as defendants (the “Southern District 

Defendants”), in the Southern District of California (Case Nos. 3:16-cv-01901, 3:16-cv-01902, 

and 3:16-cv-01903) (collectively, “the Southern District Cases”), InfoGation served infringement 

contentions on the Southern District Defendants. Google requested copies of these infringement 

contentions on December 12, 2016, and was provided with copies on December 14, 2016. 

6. Second, the Southern District Defendants had previously filed motions to stay the 

Southern District Cases pending resolution of this case (“Motions to Stay”). On December 21, 

2016, the Court in the Southern District Cases issued identical orders in each of the three actions 

denying the Southern District Defendants’ Motions to Stay. 

7. The parties have agreed to submit InfoGation’s infringement contentions from the 

Southern District Cases, as well as the orders denying the Southern District Defendants’ Motions 

to Stay, along with minimal briefing by each party. 

8. InfoGation’s brief, to be considered as supplementation of its Motion to Dismiss 

and Reply, is attached as “Exhibit A.” 

9. Google’s brief, to be considered as supplementation of its Opposition, is attached 

as “Exhibit B.” 

Case 3:16-cv-05821-VC Document 33 Filed 12/29/16 Page 2 of 5
- 2 - STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

 NO. 3:16-cv-05821-VC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

10. InfoGation’s infringement contentions from the three Southern District Cases are 

attached as “Exhibit C,” “Exhibit D,” and “Exhibit E.” 

11. The orders denying the Southern District Defendants’ Motions to Stay are attached 

as “Exhibit F,” “Exhibit G,” and “Exhibit H.” 

DATED: December 28, 2016 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

 By: __/s/ Mark Liang_____________ 

 Mark Liang 

Darin W. Snyder (S.B. #136003) 

Luann L. Simmons (S.B. #203526) 

David S. Almeling (S.B. #235449) 

Mark Liang (S.B. #278487) 

John X. Zhu (S.B. #310857) 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Mishima Alam (S.B. #271621) 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

1625 Eye Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Telephone: (202) 383-5300 

Facsimile: (202) 383-5414 

Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC. 

DATED: December 28, 2016 MITCHELL & COMPANY 

 

 By: _/s/ Brian E. Mitchell_____________

Brian E. Mitchell 

 Brian E. Mitchell (SBN 190095) 

Marcel F. De Armas (SBN 289282) 

MITCHELL + COMPANY 

4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 766-3514 

Facsimile: (415) 402-0058 

Brian.Mitchell@mcolawoffices.com 

mdearmas@mcolawoffices.com 

Edward A. Pennington 

(admitted pro hac vice) 

John P. Moy 

(pro hac vice application to be filed) 

Case 3:16-cv-05821-VC Document 33 Filed 12/29/16 Page 3 of 5
- 3 - STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

 NO. 3:16-cv-05821-VC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Sean T.C. Phelan 

(pro hac vice application to be filed) 

Jennifer L. Feldman 

(admitted pro hac vice) 

John P. Pennington 

(admitted pro hac vice) 

SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL LLP 

1055 Thomas Jefferson St., N.W., Ste 400 

Washington, D.C. 20007 

Tel: (202) 263-4300 

Fax: (202) 263-4329 

epennington@sgrlaw.com 

jmoy@sgrlaw.com 

sphelan@sgrlaw.com 

jfeldman@sgrlaw.com 

jpennington@sgrlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INFOGATION CORP. 

FILER’S ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose 

behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the filing. 

Dated: December 28, 2016 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Mark Liang

 Mark Liang 

Attorney for Plaintiff Google Inc. 

Case 3:16-cv-05821-VC Document 33 Filed 12/29/16 Page 4 of 5
- 4 - STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

 NO. 3:16-cv-05821-VC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ supplemental 

briefs, in the form of the attached Exhibits A and B, shall be filed within three days from this 

Order. 

Dated: December ___, 2016 _______________________ Vince Chhabria 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:16-cv-05821-VC Document 33 Filed 12/29/16 Page 5 of 5