Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02420/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-02420-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC ANTHONY ALSTON, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:18-cv-02420 TLN-CKD

ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c).

On March 4, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 

filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 56.) Plaintiff filed objections on March 9, 2020, (ECF No. 

57), and Defendants responded to the objections on March 24, 2020 (ECF No. 58).

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 

////

////

////

////

Case 2:18-cv-02420-TLN-CKD Document 59 Filed 05/12/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 4, 2020 (ECF No. 56), are ADOPTED 

IN FULL.

2. Plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF No. 52) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 12, 2020

Case 2:18-cv-02420-TLN-CKD Document 59 Filed 05/12/20 Page 2 of 2