Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00824/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00824-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LINDA ELIZABETH RICCHIO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

WARDEN TINA HORNBEAK, et al., ) 

 )

Respondents. )

)

 ) 

1:10-cv—0824-SKO-HC

ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER’S

OBJECTION TO ORDER TRANSFERRING

ACTION AND MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER

AND FOR RELIEF FROM TRANSFER

PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 59-

60(b) (DOC. 13)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303. 

Petitioner is an inmate of Valley State Prison for Women

(VSPW) in Chowchilla, California, which is within the Eastern

District of California. Petitioner is serving a sentence

pursuant to a conviction in the San Diego Superior Court (pet. 3)

and challenges a decision to deny her parole, which was rendered

at VSPW. On May 10, 2010, Petitioner’s action was transferred to

this Court from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of California. 

1

Case 1:10-cv-00824-OWW -SKO Document 16 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On May 27, 2010, Petitioner filed objections to the

transfer, a motion for reconsideration of the transfer, and a

motion for relief from the transfer. Her objections and motions

were captioned for the United States District Court for the

Southern District of California. (Doc. 13, 1.) Further,

Petitioner stated in her papers that she was filing the motion in

the Southern District, and she was serving a copy on this Court. 

(Id.) The Clerk of this Court, however, docketed the papers as

an objection and motion to reconsider pending in this Court.

Accordingly, to maintain the integrity of the docket,

Petitioner’s objections and motions for reconsideration of, and

relief from, the order of transfer are DISREGARDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 19, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00824-OWW -SKO Document 16 Filed 07/19/10 Page 2 of 2