Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01294/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01294-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

23843518v.1

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Kristina M. Launey (SBN 221335)

E-mail: klauney@seyfarth.com

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350

Sacramento, California 95814-4428

Telephone: (916) 448-0159

Facsimile: (916) 558-4839

Attorneys for Defendant

WINCO FOODS LLC dba WINCO #37

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT KALANI,

Plaintiff,

v.

WINCO FOODS, LLC dba WINCO #37,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:15-CV-01294-GEB-CKD

SECOND STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

[L.R. 144]

Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144, plaintiff ROBERT KALANI (“plaintiff”) 

and defendant WINCO FOODS, LLC dba WINCO #37 (“WinCo”), by and through their 

respective counsel, hereby stipulate that WinCo may have a 21-day extension of time in which to 

respond to plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. This is the second extension of time to respond 

to the First Amended Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by WinCo shall be due 

on or before January 28, 2016.

This stipulation and extension will not affect or alter any deadline previously set by Court 

order.

///

///

///

Case 2:15-cv-01294-JAM-CKD Document 25 Filed 01/06/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

23843518v.1

The reason for the extension is that the parties are engaged in discussions regarding 

resolution of this matter, which, if successful, would avoid further litigation.

Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), counsel for Plaintiff has authorized submission of this 

document on her behalf.

DATED: January 5, 2016 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By /s/ Kristina Launey

Kristina M. Launey

Attorneys for Defendant

WinCo Foods, LLC

DATED: January 5, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

By /s/ Tanya Moore

 Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Robert Kalani

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-01294-JAM-CKD Document 25 Filed 01/06/16 Page 2 of 2