Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00525/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00525-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0525 LKK KJM P

vs.

LEE ALEXANDER, et al., ORDER AND

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By an order filed June 6, 2006, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

return to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 form necessary for service of process on

defendant Mangis. On August 7, 2006, plaintiff submitted the USM-285 form, but plaintiff

failed to provide an address for defendant Mangis. Service of process cannot be effectuated

without an address. Plaintiff has asked that the court intervene and help plaintiff obtain

defendant Mangis’s address. However, plaintiff has failed to inform the court what the court

should do and upon what legal basis the court should do it. Because Mangis cannot be served,

the court will recommend that he be dismissed. 

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00525-LKK -KJM Document 34 Filed 10/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s August 7, 2006 “motion

requesting court’s judicial intervention . . .” is denied; and 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Mangis be dismissed from this

action.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: October 24, 2006

1/mp

wash0525.frs

Case 2:05-cv-00525-LKK -KJM Document 34 Filed 10/25/06 Page 2 of 2