Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_10-cv-08098/USCOURTS-azd-3_10-cv-08098-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 152
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Default of Student Loan

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Lesli M. Walzak a.k.a. Lesli M. Griffen,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 10-CV-8098-PCT-PGR

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 11.) Having

reviewed the entire record, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s moving papers are sufficient to

support a motion for summary judgment and do not reveal a genuine issue of material fact.

(Id., see Docs. 12, 15.) The Court further finds that Plaintiff’s motion should be granted

pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(i), based on Defendant’s failure to file an answering

memorandum. See Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651 (9th Cir. 1994).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 11). This

action is dismissed in its entirety. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 21st day of June, 2011.

Case 3:10-cv-08098-PGR Document 16 Filed 06/21/11 Page 1 of 1