Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00716/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00716-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN KATZAKIAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHECK RESOLUTION SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:10-cv-00716 AWI GSA 

ORDER FOLLOWING PLAINTIFF’S

STATUS REPORT OF JULY 19, 2010

On July 19, 2010, Plaintiff Susan Katzakian filed a Status Report in anticipation of the

initial scheduling conference set for July 27, 2010. (Doc. 7.) In her report, Plaintiff indicates

that Defendant Check Resolution Service, Inc.’s managing agent Kim Slatery was served with

the summons and complaint on May 11, 2010, in New York. To date, Defendant has not filed an

answer in this matter or otherwise appeared in the action. (Doc. 7 at 4; see also Doc. 6.)

Plaintiff notes she “plans to prepare an application to default . . . [and] may also file an amended

complaint to add Defendant’s owner.” Further, Plaintiff “anticipates filing a Request for Entry of

Default [and] Motion for Entry of Default Judgment . . ..” (Doc. 7 at 4.) 

1

Case 1:10-cv-00716-AWI-GSA Document 8 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court notes that more than two months have passed following service of the

summons and complaint on Defendant’s managing agent, Ms. Slatery. Moreover, Plaintiff filed

the instant complaint on April 22, 2010. Thus, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order,

Plaintiff shall either commence default proceedings against Defendant Check Resolutions, Inc.,

or shall file an amended complaint. Plaintiff is advised that failure to do so will result in the

issuance of an order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for a failure to

prosecute.

Finally, in light of the foregoing, the initial scheduling conference is CONTINUED to

October 13, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 10.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 21, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

6i0kij UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00716-AWI-GSA Document 8 Filed 07/21/10 Page 2 of 2