Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06579/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06579-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

WILLIAM J. NEUFELD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MACK WIMBISH, et al., )

) 

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1: 04 CV F 6579 REC DLB P 

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT USM 285 FORMS 

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro per and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint filed November 18, 2004 appears to state a

cognizable claim for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

VOTH

 FISHER

BARRAJAS 

CHASE 

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff four (4) USM-285 forms, four (4) summons, an

Case 1:04-cv-06579-LJO -DLB Document 17 Filed 05/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S . District Court

 E. D . California 2

instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed November 18, 2004.

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice

of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the court with the following

documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Five (5) copies of the endorsed complaint filed November 18, 2004. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. 

Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to

serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of

costs. 

5. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of

this action. Local Rule 11-110.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 5, 2005 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06579-LJO -DLB Document 17 Filed 05/05/05 Page 2 of 2