Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00212/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00212-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert Lee Jennings, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Arizona Department of Corrections; et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-0212-PHX-JAT

ORDER

On January 11, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) (Doc. #33) recommending that Defendant Brand be dismissed because Plaintiff

failed to timely serve said Defendant. 

No party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the

R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not

required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”

(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en

banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s

findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis

in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.

#33) is ACCEPTED; and

Case 2:07-cv-00212-JAT-JRI Document 34 Filed 02/06/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Brand is dismissed, without prejudice,

for failure to serve.

DATED this 6th day of February, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-00212-JAT-JRI Document 34 Filed 02/06/08 Page 2 of 2