Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02182/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02182-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADRIAN EUGENE MOORE, No. 2:13-cv-2182-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFFS

DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(c) and no other party has been served or appeared in the action. The court issued an order to

show cause on October 30, 2014, requiring plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be

dismissed for failure to state a claim. 

The court outlined plaintiff’s allegations in its prior order and will not repeat them

here. The court found plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim in that it appeared plaintiff’s

claims sounded in habeas not in a complaint under § 1983. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity

to explain to the court how this case would not impact the validity of his underlying conviction. 

Plaintiff was warned that failure to respond to the order to show cause may result in the dismissal

1

Case 2:13-cv-02182-CMK Document 13 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

of this action for the reasons outlined as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court

rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. 

Plaintiff filed a response to the court’s order as directed. However, plaintiff failed

to address the defects in his complaint or address the court’s determination as to his claims at all. 

Rather, he simply informed the court that he has another on-going action in this court. The court

construes plaintiff’s response as a consent to the dismissal of this action. The undersigned finds

it appropriate to dismiss this action for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be

granted. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 

DATED: April 24, 2015

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:13-cv-02182-CMK Document 13 Filed 04/27/15 Page 2 of 2