Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02864/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02864-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HARRY W. McEVERS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2864 FCD JFM PS

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., ORDER

Defendants.

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

On October 29, 2007, defendant Angela Eisentrout filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b)(4) & (5). No opposition to the motion to dismiss has been filed. 

Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party

will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to

the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may

be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.”

Case 2:06-cv-02864-FCD-JFM Document 27 Filed 11/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of December 6, 2007 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s

motion to dismiss is continued to January 10, 2008, at 11:00 a.m. 

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than

December 27, 2007. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a

statement of non-opposition and will result in a recommendation that the motion to dismiss be

granted. 

DATED: November 27, 2007.

/001; mcevers.noop

Case 2:06-cv-02864-FCD-JFM Document 27 Filed 11/28/07 Page 2 of 2