Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04624/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04624-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

WADE ROBERTSON,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SHIRAZ QADRI, AVENIR RESTAURANT

GROUP, INC. and GREG ST. CLAIRE,

Defendants. /

No. C06-04624 JF (HRL)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

REQUEST TO CONTINUE OCTOBER 9,

2007 MOTION HEARINGS

[Re: Docket No. 260]

Defendants move to continue the October 9, 2007 motion hearings on the parties’

several discovery motions. Plaintiff does not object to continuing the motion hearings on

defendants’ discovery motion and motion for sanctions. However, he opposes the request to

continue the hearing on his motion for protective order. Alternatively, he requests that if this

court is inclined to continue the hearings on all pending discovery motions, then it should also

stay all discovery, including all third-party depositions. Upon consideration of the moving and

responding papers, this court grants defendants’ request for a continuance.

Plaintiff’s motion for protective order seeks relief primarily as to the conduct of his own

deposition. In his opposition to the instant request for a continuance, plaintiff complains of

conduct pertaining to third-party depositions which was not squarely raised before this court on

his motion for protective order. In any event, the only third-party deposition plaintiff complains

about evidently took place last month; and, plaintiff points to no third-party depositions that are

*E-FILED: 10/3/2007*

Case 5:06-cv-04624-JF Document 268 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

scheduled to proceed in the near future. Moreover, plaintiff acknowledges that, pursuant to the

District Court’s July 20, 2007 order, defendants are permitted to proceed with third-party

discovery at this time. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT the motion hearings on (1)

defendants’ motion to compel, (2) defendants’ motion for sanctions and (3) plaintiff’s motion

for protective order are continued to November 6, 2007, 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2.

Dated:

 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

October 3, 2007

Case 5:06-cv-04624-JF Document 268 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:06-cv-4624 Notice electronically mailed to: 

A. Leslie Mark Gammill lmg@kerwinlaw.com 

Timothy Gray cjung@nassiri-jung.com 

Charles Hyunchul Jung cjung@nassiri-jung.com 

Patrick Cannon Kerwin pck@kerwinlaw.com 

Wade Anthony Robertson c0604624@yahoo.com

Counsel are responsible for delivering a copy of this document to co-counsel who have not

registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Case 5:06-cv-04624-JF Document 268 Filed 10/03/07 Page 3 of 3