Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05025/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05025-37/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLORIA GRENING WOLK,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PHILIP R. GREEN,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-5025 BZ

ISSUES FOR ARGUMENT

At the summary judgment argument, the parties should be

prepared to address in detail the following issues:

1. Whether Wolk would have obtained a more favorable

result in the underlying action if she had obtained a defense

verdict, including an award of costs as the prevailing party

(Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1032(b)); 

2. What evidence there is in the record that Wolk

published or republished any of the statements which the Court

of Appeal found capable of a defamatory inference in the one

year prior to the filing of the Wilbanks suit;

3. Wolk’s ability to maintain a claim for negligent

infliction of emotional distress absent physical injury; 

Case 3:06-cv-05025-BZ Document 180 Filed 03/18/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. The contact between Wolk and Karl Olson prior to her 

retaining Green and whether it precludes Olson from

acting as an expert witness against Green.

Dated: March 18, 2008

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\WOLK\SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS\ORDER RE ISSUES FOR ARGUMENT.FINAL

VERSION.wpd

Case 3:06-cv-05025-BZ Document 180 Filed 03/18/08 Page 2 of 2