Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06100/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06100-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD A. BARKER, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

GAIL LEWIS, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

1:03-CV-06100 AWI LJO HC 

ORDER WITHDRAWING OCTOBER 25,

2005, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT RECOMMENDED THE PETITION BE

DISMISSED

[Doc. #49]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On October 25, 2005, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. The undersigned further

recommended that in the event the District Court finds Petitioner has raised cognizable federal

claims, the petition should be DENIED with prejudice. The Findings and Recommendation was

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days

of the date of service of the order. 

On January 18, 2006, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The

undersigned notes that the case of Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms, 376 F.Supp.2d 975

Case 1:03-cv-06100-AWI-LJO Document 62 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

(E.D. Cal. 2005), has been appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. According to the Ninth

Circuit’s docket, the matter was argued and submitted on March 16, 2006. 

The undersigned hereby WITHDRAWS the Findings and Recommendation issued on

October 25, 2005. By separate order, a new Findings and Recommendation will be issued.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 22, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06100-AWI-LJO Document 62 Filed 08/22/06 Page 2 of 2