Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05796/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05796-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN NELSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

A. K. SCRIBNER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:03-cv-5796-OWW-LJO (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK

OF THE COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT

(Docs. 42 and 57)

Plaintiff Stephen Nelson (“plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 23, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. The parties have not filed timely

objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 23, 2005, is adopted in full; 

2. Defendant Oxford’s motion for summary judgment, filed November 2, 2004, is

GRANTED; and

Case 1:03-cv-05796-OWW -LJO Document 58 Filed 07/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for defendant and against plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 7, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05796-OWW -LJO Document 58 Filed 07/08/05 Page 2 of 2