Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01793/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01793-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HASSAN ABPIKAR,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARTIN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:11-cv-01793-DLB PC

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO 

SHOW CAUSE (ECF No. 22)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE 

TO RESPOND (ECF No. 23)

RESPONSE DUE MARCH 29, 2013

Plaintiff Hassan Abpikar (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 

action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On 

October 10, 2012, the Court screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and ordered Plaintiff 

either to file an amended complaint within thirty days or notify the Court of his willingness to 

proceed only on the claims found to be cognizable. ECF No. 19. On November 27, 2012, the Court 

granted Plaintiff up to and including December 28, 2012 by which to file a second amended 

complaint. ECF No. 21. Plaintiff did not file a response. On January 31, 2013, the Court issued an 

order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. ECF 

No. 22. On February 13, 2013, Plaintiff filed his response. ECF No. 23. Accordingly, it is 

HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s order to show cause is discharged.

Plaintiff contends that he did not receive the Court’s November 27, 2012 Order. Plaintiff 

requests that he be granted up to April 25, 2013 by which to comply with the Court’s order. Plaintiff 

provides no explanation as why he requires up to April 25, 2013 to comply. The Court will grant 

Case 1:11-cv-01793-LJO-DLB Document 24 Filed 02/26/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff’s request in part. No further extensions of time will be granted.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted up to March 29, 2013 by 

which either to file his second amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed 

only on the claims found to be cognizable in the Court’s October 10, 2012 Order. Failure to timely 

comply will result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 25, 2013 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

3b142a

Case 1:11-cv-01793-LJO-DLB Document 24 Filed 02/26/13 Page 2 of 2