Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03286/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-03286-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

23ANDME, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-03286-BLF

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY 

[Re: ECF 31]

In this declaratory relief action, Plaintiff Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company seeks a 

declaration that it does not have a duty to defend its insured, Defendant 23andMe, Inc., with 

respect to certain lawsuits, arbitration proceedings, and administrative proceedings (“underlying 

litigation”). Defendant has filed a motion to stay the declaratory relief action pending resolution 

of the underlying litigation; that motion has been fully briefed and is set for hearing on January 8, 

2015. 

Plaintiff’s administrative motion for leave to file a sur-reply is DENIED. The Court notes 

that Plaintiff already has exceeded the number of pages permitted for an opposition brief. See Civ. 

L. R. 7-3(a) (limiting opposition brief to twenty-five pages). Plaintiff has not demonstrated good 

cause for yet more pages of briefing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 20, 2014

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:14-cv-03286-BLF Document 33 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 1