Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00611/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00611-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kenneth L. Valinoti, Esq., SBN 118442

James S. McPherson, Esq., SBN 178608

VALINOTI, SPECTER & DITO, LLP

353 Sacramento Street, Suite 1140

San Francisco, California 94111-3657

Telephone: (415) 986-1338

Facsimile: (415) 986-1231

Email: kvalinoti@valinoti-dito.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

HART Pacific Commons Block 5 Owner, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEAN RYAN, 

 Plaintiff,

vs.

THE HABIT RESTAURANTS LLC, dba THE 

HABIT BURGER GRILL; HART PACIFIC 

COMMONS BLOCK 5 OWNER, LLC,

 Defendants

CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-00611-JCS

STIPULATION OF DEFENDANT HART 

PACIFIC COMMONS BLOCK 5 

OWNER, LLC AND PLAINTIFF SEAN 

RYAN TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND 

TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Northern District Rule 6-1(a)]

Plaintiff SEAN RYAN and Defendant HART PACIFIC COMMONS BLOCK 5 

OWNER, LLC (“HART”), by and through their counsel of record, do hereby stipulate to extend 

the time within which Defendant may file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s First Amended 

Complaint by fifteen (15) days.

Procedural Grounds for Stipulation:

The parties may agree between themselves to extend time within which to answer or 

otherwise respond to the complaint. Pursuant to Northern District Federal Court Rule 6-1: 

Case 3:15-cv-00611-EMC Document 24 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Enlarging or Shortening Time:

(a) When Stipulation Permissible Without Court Order. Parties may stipulate in 

writing, without a Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or 

otherwise respond to the complaint, or to enlarge or shorten the time in matters 

not required to be filed or lodged with the Court, provided the change will not 

alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. Such 

stipulations shall be promptly filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 5.

Accordingly, the parties agree that Defendant HART’s responsive pleading shall be due 

on or before June 1, 2015.

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: May 15, 2015 VALINOTI, SPECTER & DITO, LLP

_________/s/ Kenneth L. Valinoti______________

Kenneth L. Valinoti,

Attorney for Defendant HART PACIFIC 

COMMONS BLOCK 5 OWNER, LLC

Dated: May 15, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

_________/s/ Tanya E. Moore_________________

Tanya E. Moore,

Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

____________________ 

Edward M. Chen 

U.S. District Judge 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00611-EMC Document 24 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT -3-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION

I, Kenneth L. Valinoti, hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of Tanya E. 

Moore, Attorney for Plaintiff, in the filing of the attached Stipulation and the entry of her 

signature as indicated thereon.

Dated: May 15, 2015 /s/ Kenneth L. Valinoti_________________ Kenneth L. Valinoti, Attorney for Defendant

HART PACIFIC COMMONS BLOCK 5 OWNER, LLC

Case 3:15-cv-00611-EMC Document 24 Filed 05/19/15 Page 3 of 3