Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-00547/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-00547-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

Case No.: 5:16-cv-00547-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

WASHINGTON NUNES,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUIFAX, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:16-cv-00547-EJD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On June 3, 2016, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff and Defendant Bank of 

America, N.A. to meet and confer in order to reach an agreement on an ADR process and file, 

within 10 days, either (1) the form entitled “Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Selecting ADR 

Process” if an agreement is reached on one form of ADR, or (2) the form entitled “Notice of Need 

of ADR Phone Conference.” Dkt. No. 42. As of the date and time this was order was filed, the 

parties have not complied and the time for compliance has expired.

Accordingly, the parties are ordered to appear before the Honorable Edward J. Davila on 

July 7, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 1, 5th Floor, United States District Court, 280 S. 

First Street, San Jose, California, 95113, to show cause why the court should not impose any and 

all appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal of this action, on the parties, 

or any of them, for willful disobedience of a court order.

The parties may file a response to this order demonstrating good cause why sanctions

Case 5:16-cv-00547-EJD Document 47 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No.: 5:16-cv-00547-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

should not be imposed on or before July 1, 2016. In doing so, however, they must (1) explain 

their failure to comply with the original deadline to file one of the ADR forms, and (2) must also 

file one of the forms contemplated by the June 3rd Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 29, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:16-cv-00547-EJD Document 47 Filed 06/29/16 Page 2 of 2