Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01652/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01652-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On April 28, 2016, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the matter should not be 

dismissed for his failure to serve the summons and complaint, the failure to comply with Court orders

and the failure to prosecute this action. (Doc. 14) Plaintiff has now responded and explained that a 

“miscommunication” between counsel and Mr. Morales has delayed service. Id at 1. This 

miscommunication is not explained but counsel reports service will occur no later than May 14, 2016 

Id. Thus, the Court ORDERS,

///

///

///

///

///

///

ARTURO MORALES,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01652 --- JLT 

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW 

CAUSE

Case 1:15-cv-01652-JLT Document 16 Filed 05/12/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. The order to show cause is DISCHARGED. Plaintiff is advised that further failures to 

comply with the Court’s order or his failure to make service as promised (Doc. 15 at 1) will result in 

the Court dismissing the action without further notice to him.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01652-JLT Document 16 Filed 05/12/16 Page 2 of 2