Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05503/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05503-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CV 06-05503 WHA 

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

Juli E. Farris (CA Bar No. 141716) 

Jfarris@kellerrohrback.com

KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P.

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200 

Seattle, WA 98101 

(206) 623-1900 

(206) 623-3384 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff Gerald del Rosario

Michael A. Sands (CSB No. 178788) 

msands@fenwick.com

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Defendants Uzia Galil, Levy Gerzberg, Karl

Schneider, Raymond A. Burgess, James D. Meindl, James 

B. Owens, Jr., Arthur B. Stabenow, Camillo Martino, 

Paul R. Goldberg, Isaac Shenberg, Alex Sinar and 

nominal defendant Zoran Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE ZORAN CORPORATION 

DERIVATIVE LITIGATION 

 No. CV 06-05503 WHA 

DERIVATIVE ACTION

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

Case 3:06-cv-05503-WHA Document 48 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:06-cv-05503-WHA Document 49 Filed 03/23/07 Page 1 of 3
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CV 06-05503 WHA 

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have conferred regarding the case schedule in this 

Action;

WHEREAS, paragraph 3 of the Court’s December 8, 2006 Case Management Order 

entered in this Action states that Rule 26 initial disclosures “as to the securities case must be 

made within fourteen days of the service of the consolidated securities case”; 

WHEREAS, on February 9, 2007, the Court issued an Order re: Rule 26 Disclosures in 

the Class Action (Case No. CV 06-04843 WHA) extending the deadline for initial disclosures 

until fourteen days after a decision on a motion to dismiss in that case, in light of the mandatory 

stay provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”); 

WHEREAS, on March 14, 2007, Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Verified Derivative 

Complaint, which asserts federal securities law claims arising under §§10(b) and 14(a) of the 

Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §§78j(b) and 78n(a); 

WHEREAS, the Case Management Order requires that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be 

filed within 28 days of the filing of the Consolidated Verified Derivative Complaint, and 

Defendants intend to do so; 

WHEREAS, if applicable to the derivative case, paragraph 3 of the Case Management 

Order would require that Rule 26 initial disclosures be made on or before March 28, 2007, in 

advance of the filing or resolution of any motion to dismiss; 

WHEREAS, Defendants believe that the mandatory stay provisions of the PSLRA are 

applicable and should be applied to this Action, while Plaintiff disagrees with that position; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that, in light of the additional claims brought under Section 

10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act in the Consolidated Verified Complaint, requiring initial 

disclosures in advance of the resolution of the motion to dismiss may be inconsistent with this 

Court’s February 9, 2007 Order; 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:06-cv-05503-WHA Document 48 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:06-cv-05503-WHA Document 49 Filed 03/23/07 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-05503-WHA Document 48 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 3 of 3

March 23, 2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:06-cv-05503-WHA Document 49 Filed 03/23/07 Page 3 of 3