Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02950/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02950-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDALL C. DUMLER, JR.,

NO. CIV. S-09-2950 LKK/EFB

Plaintiff,

v.

O R D E R

LITTON LOAN SERVICING LP,

a limited partnership, and

DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff in this case brings claims arising out of his

mortgage. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss noticed for

hearing on February 8, 2010. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c),

plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition was due on

January 25, 2010. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or

statement of non-opposition. 

Based on the above, the court ORDERS as follows:

1. Counsel for plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in

writing why sanctions should not issue in accordance

Case 2:09-cv-02950-LKK -EFB Document 13 Filed 01/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

with Local Rule 110, including a fine of $150 and/or

dismissal of this case. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b),

Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 633 (1962). Counsel

shall file a response to this order to show cause no

later than February 8, 2010.

2. Hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 8) is

CONTINUED to February 22, 2010 at 10:00 a.m.

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition or

statement of non-opposition on or before February 8,

2010. Defendant may file and serve a reply no later

than February 16, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 28, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02950-LKK -EFB Document 13 Filed 01/28/10 Page 2 of 2