Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01175/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01175-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

MICHAEL LI-MING WONG, SBN 194130 

mwong@gibsondunn.com 

THAD A. DA VIS, SBN 220503 

tdavis@gibsondunn.com 

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, 

CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 

Facsimile: 415.393.8306 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

JOSHUA A. JESSEN, SBN 222831 

jjessen@gibsondunn.com 

PRIYANKA RAJAGOPALAN, SBN 278504 

prajagopalan@gibsondunn.com 

1881 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: 650.849.5300 

Facsimile: 650.849.5333 

12 Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SASHA ANTMAN, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Does 1-

50, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: 3:15-CV-01175-LB 

STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND 

HEARING DATE REGARDING UBER'S 

REQUEST FOR IN CAMERA AND OUTSIDE 

COUNSEL REVIEW OF DEPOSITION 

TRANSCRIPT OF X IN OTHER LITIGATION 

STIP RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE & HEARING DATE RE UBER'S REQUEST FOR IN CAMERA AND OUTSIDE COUNSEL 

REVIEW OF DEPOSmON TRANSCRIPT OF x IN OTIIER LmGATION 

Attorneys for Non-Party X

Case 3:15-cv-01175-LB Document 72 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 3
1 WHEREAS, Defendant Uber Technologies filed a Request for "In Camera and Outside 

2 Counsel Review of Deposition Transcript of X1 in Other Litigation" ("Request") on December 

3 16, 2015, under seal; 

4 WHEREAS, X seeks to oppose Uber's Request; 

5 ACCORDINGLY, Uber and X, by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and 

6 request that the Comi enter this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order setting the briefing schedule as 

7 follows: 

8 • X files any opposition no later than December 30, 2015; 

9 • Uber files any reply no later than Janmuy 6, 2016; 

10 • Hearing date: Januaiy 21, 2016, 9:30am. 

11 

12 SO STIPULATED 

13 Dated: December 23, 2015 By: ls/ MICHAEL LI-M ING WONG 

M ICHAEL L I-MING WONG 

14 T HADA. DAVIS 

15 

16 

17 

18 

JOSHUAA. JESSEN 

PRIY ANKA RAfAGOPALAN 

Attorneys for Defendant Uber 

Technologies, Inc. 

19 Dated: December 23, 2015 By: 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Attorneys for Non-Party X 

1 X is the Non-Party refened to in this Court's Order on Joint Discove1y Letter [ECF No. 59]. 

STIP RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE & HEARING DATE RE UBER'S REQUEST FOR IN CAMERA AND OUTSIDE COUNSEL 

REVIEW OF DEPOSmON TRANSCRIPT OF x IN OTIIER LmGATION 

Case 3:15-cv-01175-LB Document 72 Filed 12/23/15 Page 2 of 3
STIP RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE & HEARING DATE RE UBER’S REQUEST FOR IN CAMERA AND OUTSIDE COUNSEL 

REVIEW OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT OF X IN OTHER LITIGATION 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, I, Michael Li-Ming Wong, hereby attest that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from 

DATED: December 23, 2015 By: __/s/ Michael Li-Ming Wong________

Michael Li-Ming Wong 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. X’s opposition to Uber’s 

motion is due no later than December 30, 2015. Uber’s reply brief is due no later than January 6, 

2016. Hearing on the motion is set for January 20, 2016; 9:30am. 

DATED: ___________________ _______________________ 

Hon. Laurel Beeler 

United States Magistrate Judge

December 23, 2015 Ubder shall serve a copy of this order to the party proceeding as X. 

Case 3:15-cv-01175-LB Document 72 Filed 12/23/15 Page 3 of 3