Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03827/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03827-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Alisha Rae Sanchez, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al. 

 Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV05-3827-PHX-SRB

ORDER

Petitioner filed her Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

on November 23, 2005, claiming 1) she was denied effective assistance of counsel, 2) juror

misconduct, 3) her constitutional rights were violated when an un-Mirandized statement was

taken, and 4) she was denied a fair trial. On May 15, 2006, Respondents filed their answer

to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No reply was filed. On June 22, 2006,

the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition

be denied because it was not filed within the one-year period required by 28 U.S.C. §

2254(d)(1)(A) and because Plaintiff has not established her entitlement to equitable tolling.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Case 2:05-cv-03827-SRB Document 12 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied

and dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 23rd day of August, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03827-SRB Document 12 Filed 08/24/06 Page 2 of 2