Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01486/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01486-116/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Counsel listed on signature page.] 

ITNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
 

) 

) Master File No. C-02-1486 CW 

In re IDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION ) 

SECURITIES LITIGATION ) CLASS ACTION 

) 

This Document Relates To: All Actions ) STIPlTLATION AND [PROPOSED] 

) ORDER REGARDING EXHIBITS 

) 

) 

) 

) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE No. 02-01486CW (EDL) 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1723 Filed 10/26/07 Page 1 of 10
5

10

15

20

25

1 

2 

3 

4 

6 

7 

8 

9 

11 

12 

13 

14 

16 

17 

18 

19 

21 

22 

23 

24 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, on October 24,2007, Defendants examined expert witness Terrence 

Bamich; 

WHEREAS, Defendants moved into evidence certain exhibits during their examination 

of Mr. Bamich; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that three exhibits used during Defendants' examination of 

Mr. Bamich should be admitted into evidence; 

WHEREAS, on October 25, Lead Plaintiff introduced the testimony ofThomas Pitre by 

video deposition; 

WHEREAS, prior to playing the video deposition testimony of Mr. Pitre, Lead Plaintiff 

inadvertently moved for the admission of exhibits PX 48, 124, 135, 172, 293, 359, 383, 439, and 

874, which were not introduced during his testimony; 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to clarify the exhibits that Lead Plaintiff seeks to move into 

evidence; 

WHEREAS, the parties further agree that two exhibits discussed during Defendants' 

designations of Mr. Pitre's deposition testimony should be admitted into evidence; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their counsel of 

record, that: 

1. The following exhibits introduced during the examination of Terrence Barnich are 

admitted into evidence: 

DX 2512 CLEC Report 2001 (page 3 of 13); 

DX2642 New Paradigm Press Resources press release dated March 6, 2007;·and 

DX 2643 New Paradigm Press Resources press release dated June 4,2007; 

2. Exhibits labeled PX 48, 124, 135, 172,293, 359, 383, 439, and 874, which Lead 

Plaintiff moved into evidence before the videotape deposition testimony ofThomas Pitre are 

withdrawn without prejudice to Lead Plaintiff later moving the Court for admission ofthose 

exhibits; 

3. The following exhibits introduced during the videotape deposition testimony of 

Thomas Pitre are admitted into evidence: 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE No. 02-01486 CW (EDL) 1 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1723 Filed 10/26/07 Page 2 of 10
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PX 124 April 7, 2000 email from Mario Leduc to Thomas Pitre 

(with handwriting redacted); 

PX379 August 18, 2000 email from Thomas Pitre to OPSS; 

PX 172 May 31, 2000 email from Thomas Pitre to Martin Matthews; 

PX388 August 21,2000 Forecast Distribution and FPO Demand Forecast; 

DX 1842 Redbook Review Ql FY 01 (pages Bates labeled JDSU 1730546-71); and 

DX 1714 April 26, 2000 email from Thomas Pitre to Orlando Estezo. 

Dated: October 26, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 

By: /s/ Anthony J. Harwood 

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 

Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds 

BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO 

BlTRT & PUCILLO 

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 

Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE No. 02-01486 cw EDL 

2 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1723 Filed 10/26/07 Page 3 of 10
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: October 26, 2007 

Dated: October 26,2007 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By: /s/ Philip Besirof 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JDS Uniphase Corporation, Charles 1. Abbe, Jozef 

Straus, and Anthony Muller 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Howard Caro 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Kevin Kalkhoven 

CLAUDIA WILKEN 

United States District Judge 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE No. 02-01486 CW EDL 

3 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1723 Filed 10/26/07 Page 4 of 10
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I, Anthony Harwood, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Exhibits. In compliance with General Order 45, 

X.B., I hereby attest that Philip Besirof, attorney for Defendants, JDS Uniphase Corporation, 

Charles J. Abbe, JozefStraus, and Anthony R. Muller, and Howard Caro, attorney for Kevin 

Kalkhoven, have concurred in this filing. 

Dated: October 26,2007 LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 

By: /s/ Anthony J. Harwood 

Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 

Connecticut Retirement Plans 

and Trust Funds 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE No. 02-01486 CW EDL 

4 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1723 Filed 10/26/07 Page 5 of 10
1

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

[Counsel listed on signature page.] 

lTNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

)
 

) Master File No. C-02-1486 CW 

In re JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION 

SEClTRITIES LITIGATION 

)
 

) CLASS ACTION
 

)
 

This Document Relates To: All Actions ) STIPlTLATION AND [PROPOSED] 

) ORDER REGARDING EXHIBITS 

)

)

)

)
 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE No. 02-01486 CW (EDL) 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1723 Filed 10/26/07 Page 6 of 10
5

10

15

20

25

1 

2 

3 

4 

6 

7 

8 

9 

11 

12 

13 

14 

16 

17 

18 

19 

21 

22 

23 

24 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2007, Defendants examined expert witness Terrence 

Barnich; 

WHEREAS, Defendants moved into evidence certain exhibits during their examination 

of Mr. Bamich; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that three exhibits used during Defendants' examination of 

Mr. Barnich should be admitted into evidence; 

WHEREAS, on October 25, Lead Plaintiff introduced the testimony of Thomas Pitre by 

video deposition; 

WHEREAS, prior to playing the video deposition testimony of Mr. Pitre, Lead Plaintiff 

inadvertently moved for the admission of exhibits PX 48, 124, 135, 172,293,359, 383,439, and 

874, which were not introduced during his testimony; 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to clarify the exhibits that Lead Plaintiff seeks to move into 

evidence; 

WHEREAS, the parties further agree that two exhibits discussed during Defendants' 

designations of Mr. Pitre's deposition testimony should be admitted into evidence; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their counsel of 

record, that: 

1. The following exhibits introduced during the examination of Terrence Barnich are 

admitted into evidence: 

DX 2512 CLEC Report 2001 (page 3 of 13); 

DX2642 New Paradigm Press Resources press release dated March 6, 2007;· and 

DX 2643 New Paradignl Press Resources press release dated June 4,2007; 

2. Exhibits labeled PX 48, 124, 135, 172,293,359,383,439, and 874, which Lead 

Plaintiff moved into evidence before the videotape deposition testimony of Thomas Pitre are 

withdrawn without prejudice to Lead Plaintiff later moving the Court for admission of those 

exhibits; 

3. The following exhibits introduced during the videotape deposition testimony of 

Thomas Pitre are admitted into evidence: 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASENo. 02-01486CW (EDL) 1 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1723 Filed 10/26/07 Page 7 of 10
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PX 124 April 7, 2000 email from Mario Leduc to Thomas Pitre 

(with handwriting redacted); 

PX379 August 18, 2000 email from Thomas Pitre to OPSS; 

PX 172 May 31, 2000 email from Thomas Pitre to Martin Matthews; 

PX 388 August 21, 2000 Forecast Distribution and FPG Demand Forecast; 

DX 1842 Redbook Review Q1 FY 01 (pages Bates labeled JDSU 1730546-71); and 

DX 1714 April 26, 2000 email from Thomas Pitre to Orlando Estezo. 

Dated: October 26, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 

By: /s/ Anthony J. Harwood 

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 

Connecticut Retirenlent Plans and Trust Funds 

BERMAN DeVALERIO PEASE TABACCO 

BURT & PUCILLO 

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 

Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE No. 02-01486 CW EDL 

2 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1723 Filed 10/26/07 Page 8 of 10
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: October 26, 2007 

Dated: October 26, 2007 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By: lsi Philip Besirof 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JDS Uniphase Corporation, Charles 1. Abbe, Jozef 

Straus, and Anthony Muller 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

By: lsi Howard Caro 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Kevin Kalkhoven 

CLAUDIA WILKEN 

United States District Judge 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE No. 02-01486 CW DL 

3 

10/26/07

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1723 Filed 10/26/07 Page 9 of 10
5

10

15

20

25

I, Anthony Harwood, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
 

2 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Exhibits. In compliance with General Order 45,
 

3 X.B., I hereby attest that Philip Besirof, attorney for Defendants, JDS Uniphase Corporation,
 

4 Charles J. Abbe, Jozef Straus, and Anthony R. Muller, and Howard Caro, attorney for Kevin
 

Kalkhoven, have concurred in this filing.
 

6
 

7
 Dated: October 26, 2007 LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
 

8
 

9
 

By: lsi Anthony 1. Harwood 

Counsel for Lead Plaintiff 

Connecticut Retirement Plans 

11
 and Trust Funds
 

12
 

13
 

14
 

16
 

17
 

18
 

19
 

21
 

22
 

23
 

24
 

26
 

27
 

28
 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
 

CASE No. 02-01486CW EDL
 

4 

Case 4:02-cv-01486-CW Document 1723 Filed 10/26/07 Page 10 of 10