Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00766/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00766-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2003 Job Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD HITTLE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF STOCKTON, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:12–cv–766–TLN–KJN

ORDER AFTER INFORMAL TELEPHONIC

DISCOVERY CONFERENCE

(ECF No. 74)

On March 24, 2020, the court held an informal telephonic discovery conference to discuss 

(1) five categories of allegedly-missing documents, as sought by plaintiff, as listed in the joint 

letter; and (2) plaintiff’s request for additional time to depose defendants Deis and Montes. (See

ECF No. 74.) Alan Reinach and Wendy Musell appearing for plaintiff; Geoffrey Spellberg 

appearing for defendants. As discussed at the conference, the court now ORDERS that:

1. Within one week of this order, defendants shall present to plaintiff a declaration from 

the City’s Custodian of Records indicating that the allegedly-missing documents

(including recordings) either: (a) existed but cannot be located, (b) did not exist, or (c) 

have already been produced. The Custodian shall detail the procedures undertaken in 

attempting to locate any missing documents.

////

////

Case 2:12-cv-00766-TLN-KJN Document 76 Filed 04/07/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiffs are granted 4 hours to depose Deis and 4 hours to depose Montes; this 

includes whatever time remains from their previous deposition. 

Dated: April 7, 2020

Case 2:12-cv-00766-TLN-KJN Document 76 Filed 04/07/20 Page 2 of 2