Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02438/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02438-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX

MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,

 /

This document relates to:

Esfir Klebanova, 06-2438

____________________________________/

No. MDL 05-1699 CRB

ORDER RE: MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

Now pending before the Court is the motion of the Sanders Viener Grossman, LLP

law firm, counsel for the above-named Plaintiff, to withdraw as counsel of record in this

matter. 

After carefully considering the motion, the Court ORDERS PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE as to why (1) counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record should not be

granted; and (2) Plaintiff’s lawsuit should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. If Plaintiff wishes to contest the withdrawal of counsel and/or dismissal

of Plaintiff’s lawsuit for failure to prosecute, Plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing on or

before August 20, 2010 of the reasons the withdrawal should not be granted or the case

dismissed. If Plaintiff will be proceeding without a lawyer, Plaintiff must advise the Court of

how the Court should contact Plaintiff. 

Case 3:06-cv-02438-CRB Document 56 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\showcauseorders\KlebanovaOSC.wpd 2

Plaintiff is warned that Plaintiff’s failure to communicate with the Court in writing as

set forth above may result in dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims with prejudice.

Plaintiff’s counsel shall ensure that Plaintiff receives a copy of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 22, 2010 

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-02438-CRB Document 56 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 2