Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01053/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01053-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Deadline to Complete Discovery 

CASE NO. 06 CV 1053 GEB 

Jamie S. Platto (SBN 226723) 

EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. 

One California Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-5427 

Telephone: 415.398.3500 

Facsimile: 415.398.0955 

E-mail: jplatto@ebglaw.com 

Hans U. Stucki (Pro Hac Vice) 

Jake Schmidt (Pro Hac Vice) 

EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. 

150 N. Michigan Avenue, 35th Floor 

Chicago, Illinois 60601 

Telephone: 312.499.1400 

Facsimile: 312.845.1998 

E-mail: hstucki@ebglaw.com 

E-mail: jschmidt@ebglaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

AAR Manufacturing, Inc., AAR Mobility Systems, 

and Jeanne Langmesser 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

READY TRANSPORTATION, INC., a Texas

corporation, AVAILABLE SHIPPERS, INC., 

a Texas corporation and QUICK 

TRANSPORTATION, INC., a Nevada 

corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

AAR MANUFACTURING, INC., a 

California corporation, AAR MOBILITY 

SYSTEMS, a corporation of unknown 

citizenship, JEANNE LANGNESSER, an 

individual, DEFENSE CONTRACT 

MANAGEMENT AGENCY, an agency of 

the United States Government and 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, an agency of 

the United States Government, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 06 CV 1053 GEB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO 

COMPLETE DISCOVERY 

Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

Case 2:06-cv-01053-GEB -GGH Document 47 Filed 07/24/07 Page 1 of 4
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 1 - 

 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Deadline to Complete Discovery 

CASE NO. 06 CV 1053 GEB 

Now come Plaintiffs, Defendants AAR Manufacturing, Inc. and AAR Mobility Systems 

(“AAR Defendants”) and Defendants Defense Contract Management Agency and Department of 

Defense (“Government Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, 

hereby stipulate and agree to the following: 

A. Since the entry of this Court’s Scheduling Order of August 16, 2006, the parties 

hereto have diligently conducted discovery in this matter. Specifically, at least eight (8) 

depositions of various parties and non-parties have been scheduled and taken and in excess of ten 

(10) sets of written discovery have been exchanged among the parties. 

B. Notwithstanding the diligence of the parties in pursuing discovery in this matter, 

counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel for the AAR Defendants each have a further Rule 30(B)(6) to 

conduct and counsel for Plaintiffs has also expressed interest in conducting two (2) additional 

depositions of current and former AAR employees. 

C. The current date set for completion of discovery and related discovery disputes is 

July 24, 2007. Counsel for the AAR Defendants is not available to complete all of the proposed 

depositions within the currently scheduled discovery closure date. 

D. Notwithstanding the diligence of the parties and the continuing effort of the 

parties to resolve remaining discovery issues, there are issues which may need to be resolved by 

the Court on timely Motion to Compel. Additionally, the parties are mutually concerned that 

issues could possibly arise in the course of the remaining proposed depositions which would 

require the attention of the Court. 

E. Plaintiffs and the AAR Defendants are agreed that the interests of justice would 

be best served by an extension of the current discovery deadline by the period of an additional 

forty-five (45) days through and including September 7, 2007. Counsel for the Government 

Defendants does not oppose any extension of the discovery deadline provided that Plaintiffs and 

the AAR Defendants do not conduct further discovery from the Government Defendants after the 

current discovery cut-off date. 

Case 2:06-cv-01053-GEB -GGH Document 47 Filed 07/24/07 Page 2 of 4
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Deadline to Complete Discovery 

CASE NO. 06 CV 1053 GEB 

F. The parties have not previously requested any extension of the discovery 

deadline. No other dates in the Court’s Scheduling Order would be affected. 

WHEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree that the date to complete discovery 

shall be extended until September 7, 2007. 

 DATED: July 24, 2007 EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. 

By: /s/ Hans U. Stucki 

Attorney for AAR Defendants 

DATED: July 17, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY C. RILEY 

By: /s/ Timothy C. Riley (as authorized on July 17, 2007) 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

DATED: July 17, 2007 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

By: /s/ John F. Gisla (as authorized on July 17, 2007) 

Attorney for Government Defendants 

Case 2:06-cv-01053-GEB -GGH Document 47 Filed 07/24/07 Page 3 of 4
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 - 

 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Deadline to Complete Discovery 

CASE NO. 06 CV 1053 GEB 

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation, and upon having reviewed the parties’ request to extend the 

deadline for conducting discovery, and finding good cause in support thereof, the Court orders 

that the parties have until September 7, 2007 in which to complete discovery. 

Dated: July 24, 2007 __________________________________________ 

 Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

 United States District Judge 

 

Case 2:06-cv-01053-GEB -GGH Document 47 Filed 07/24/07 Page 4 of 4