Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02488/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02488-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

184959.1 -1- 

WILKE,FLEURY,HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAC RAMENTO STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CHERYL PAIZIS, D.O.

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 

ROBERT F. TYLER (SBN 063055) 

400 Capitol Mall, Twenty-Second Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 441-2430 

Facsimile: (916) 442-6664 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JUDITH JOHNSON, R.N., CHERYL PAIZIS, D.O., sued 

and served herein as CHERYL PAIGIS, D.O. and HENRY 

ISHIBASHI, LSW 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Estate of JOSE ELIZAR ARAMBULA, 

deceased, by and through ELIAS 

ARAMBULA and ANDREW 

ARAMBULA, minors through their mother 

and guardian ad litem Irma Rodriguez, as 

successors in interest; ELIAS 

ARAMBULA and ANDREW 

ARAMBULA, Individually; and 

SOCORRO ARAMBULA, Individually, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; 

Sacramento County Sheriff's Department; 

Sheriff LOU BLANAS; Sacramento 

County Sheriff's Department Captain JIM 

COOPER; JUDITH JOHNSON, R.N.; 

CHERYL PAIGIS, D.O.; and Does I 

through XL, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. CIV.S-02-2488 FCD JFM 

(Consolidated Action) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT CHERYL PAIZIS, D.O. 

Complaint Filed: July 2, 2004 

Trial Date: June 6, 2006 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND 

DEFENDANT CHERYL PAIZIS, D.O. AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiffs have agreed to dismiss all of the claims they have asserted herein, as 

against Defendant Cheryl Paizis, D.O., with prejudice; 

/ / / 

Case 2:02-cv-02488-FCD-JFM Document 125 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

184959.1 -2- 

WILKE,FLEURY,HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAC RAMENTO STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CHERYL PAIZIS, D.O.

2. Defendant Cheryl Paizis, D.O. has agreed in return to waive any claims she may 

otherwise have for recovery of her costs of suit herein. 

DATED: October 24, 2005 WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, 

GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 

By: //ROBERT F. TYLER// 

ROBERT F. TYLER 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

JUDITH JOHNSON, R.N., and CHERYL 

PAIZIS, D.O. 

DATED: October 17, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ 

By: //STEWART KATZ// 

STEWART KATZ 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

JULIEN PROVENCHER, SR., Individually; 

JEAN THURSTON, Individually 

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is hereby 

ordered that the Plaintiff Arambulas’ various claims against Defendant Cheryl Paizis, D.O., and 

each of them, are hereby dismissed. 

Dated: October 25, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

 Frank C. Damrell, Jr. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:02-cv-02488-FCD-JFM Document 125 Filed 10/26/05 Page 2 of 2