Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00260/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00260-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SEAVON PIERCE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SACRAMENTO BEE, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:16-cv-0260 JAM CKD P 

ORDER 

 On March 14, 2016, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a request for 

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s February 29, 2016 order denying plaintiff’s request to 

proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall 

be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court 

finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to 

law. 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED plaintiff’s March 14, 2014 motion for 

reconsideration (ECF No. 10) is denied. 

DATED: March 29, 2016 

 /s/ John A. Mendez__________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-00260-JAM-CKD Document 13 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 1