Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02099/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02099-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LASONJA PORTER, et al., No. 06-CV-2099-MCE-GGH PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

CITY OF DAVIS POLICE

DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendant.

_________________________/

On April 10, 2007, the magistrate judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice that any objections to the findings and

recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections

were filed.

Accordingly, the Court presumes any findings of fact are

correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th

Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

Case 2:06-cv-02099-MCE -GGH Document 12 Filed 06/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and,

good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt

the Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 10, 2007,

are ADOPTED; and

2. Defendant Burkely is dismissed from this action with

prejudice.

Dated: June 18, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-02099-MCE -GGH Document 12 Filed 06/19/07 Page 2 of 2