Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03763/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03763-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

CASE NO. C-04-3763 SI

sf-2057607

BROOKS M. BEARD (CAL. BAR NO. 181271)

CHRISTOPHER E. BABBITT (CAL. BAR NO. 225813)

SHALINI BHARGAVA (CAL. BAR NO. 223258)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

Email: bbeard@mofo.com

 cbabbitt@mofo.com

sbhargava@mofo.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff GREGORY TILLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GREGORY TILLIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTHONY LAMARQUE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C-04-3763 SI 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

PROPOSED ORDER TO 

CONTINUE HEARING ON 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Hearing: February 17, 2006

Time: 9:00 am

Plaintiff Gregory Tillis and Defendants Jay Agamao, Rudolph Binkele, Thomas Carey, 

Gregory Espinoza, Dennis Allen Lalanne, Anthony Lamarque, Jimmy Mendez, Jose Moreno, 

Christopher Sickelton, Alan Tucker, and Terri Warlaumont, by and through their counsel, hereby 

stipulate to the following and respectfully request that the Court continue the February 17, 2006 

hearing on all motions to dismiss until March 3, 2006, or the next hearing date thereafter that is 

mutually agreeable to the Court and the parties:

1. Plaintiff Gregory Tillis filed an amended complaint on September 2, 2005, against 

the above-named defendants. 

Case 3:04-cv-03763-SI Document 96 Filed 01/05/2006 Page 1 of 4
 Case 3:04-cv-03763-SI Document 97 Filed 01/06/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

CASE NO. C-04-3763 SI 2

sf-2057607

2. The above-named defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaint as 

follows. Defendants Binkele, Carey, Espinoza, Lalanne, Mendez, Moreno, Tucker and 

Warlaumont, all of whom are represented by the Attorney General’s Office, filed a motion to 

dismiss on October 11, 2005. The hearing on that motion was originally set for December 2, 

2005, but was continued to January 13, 2006, so that the motion could be heard on the same date 

as Defendants Agamao and Sickelton’s later-filed motions to dismiss.

3. Defendant Agamao, represented by Longyear, O’Dea, and Lavra LLP, filed a 

motion to dismiss and a joinder in the motion filed by the defendants represented by the Attorney 

General’s Office on December 9, 2005. Defendant Sickelton, represented by Angelo, Kilday & 

Kilduff, filed a motion to dismiss and a joinder in the motion filed by the defendants represented 

by the Attorney General’s Office on December 13, 2005. Defendant Lamarque, represented by 

the Attorney General’s Office, filed a joinder in all of the previously filed motions on 

December 20, 2005. The remaining defendants represented by the Attorney General’s Office 

filed a joinder in the motions filed by Defendants Agamao and Sickelton on December 21, 2005.

4. To accommodate motion filed by Mr. Sickelton and the joinders filed by the 

defendants represented by the Attorney General’s Office under the 35-day time limit imposed by 

Local Rule 7-2(a), the parties agreed to continue the hearing on the motions to dismiss from 

January 13, 2006, to a later date, on the condition that the hearing not be set for February 10 

and 17, 2006, when Mr. Tillis’ counsel would be unavailable.

5. On December 21, 2005, the Defendants filed a notice continuing the hearing on 

their motion to dismiss from January 13, 2006, to January 27, 2006. On December 23, 2006, the 

Court sua sponte continued the hearing to February 17, 2006. 6. The requested continuation of the hearing would not have any effect on the 

schedule for the case.

7. For the foregoing reasons, and in order to effectuate the prior agreement among 

counsel, the parties stipulate to continue the hearing from February 17, 2006, until March 3, 2006, or the next available hearing date that is mutually agreeable to the Court and the parties. 

Case 3:04-cv-03763-SI Document 96 Filed 01/05/2006 Page 2 of 4
 Case 3:04-cv-03763-SI Document 97 Filed 01/06/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

CASE NO. C-04-3763 SI 3

sf-2057607

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 5 , 2006 BROOKS M. BEARD

CHRISTOPHER E. BABBITT

SHALINI BHARGAVA

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Christopher E. Babbitt

Christopher E. Babbitt

Attorneys for Plaintiff GREGORY TILLIS

Dated: January 5 , 2006 BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

JONATHAN L. WOLFF

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

AUSTIN J. CATTERMOLE

DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

Deputy Attorney General

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000

San Francisco, CA 94102-7004

Telephone: (415) 703-5553

Facsimile: (415) 703-5843

Email: austin.cattermole@doj.ca.gov

By: /s/ Austin J. Cattermole

Austin J. Cattermole

Attorneys for Defendants RUDOLPH BINKELE, 

THOMAS L. CAREY, GREGORY ESPINOZA, 

DENNIS ALLEN LALANNE, ANTHONY 

LAMARQUE, JIMMY MENDEZ, JOSE 

MORENO, ALAN TUCKER, TERRI 

WARLAUMONT, and Respondents 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND 

REHABILITATION, SALINAS VALLEY 

STATE PRISON, and OFFICE OF INTERNAL 

AFFAIRS

Case 3:04-cv-03763-SI Document 96 Filed 01/05/2006 Page 3 of 4
 Case 3:04-cv-03763-SI Document 97 Filed 01/06/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

CASE NO. C-04-3763 SI 4

sf-2057607

Dated: January 5 , 2006 JOHN A. LAVRA

JERI L. PAPPONE

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP

3620 American River Drive, Suite 230

Sacramento, CA 95864

Telephone: (916) 974-8500

Facsimile: (916) 974-8510

Email: lavra@lolllp.com

By: /s/ Jeri L. Pappone

Jeri L. Pappone

Attorneys for Defendant JAY AGAMAO

Dated: January 5 , 2006 DOUGLAS R. THORN

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF

601 University Avenue, Suite 150

Sacramento, CA 95825

Telephone: (916) 564-6100

Facsimile: (916) 564-6263

Email: dthorn@akk-law.com

By: /s/ Douglas R. Thorn

Douglas R. Thorn

Attorneys for Defendant CHRISTOPHER 

SICKELTON

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the parties’ stipulation, and for good cause shown, the hearing 

on the Defendants’ motions to dismiss is continued from February 27, 2006 to March 3, 2006.

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered. Dated: _________________________

Susan Illston

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03763-SI Document 96 Filed 01/05/2006 Page 4 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Susan Illston

Case 3:04-cv-03763-SI Document 97 Filed 01/06/06 Page 4 of 4