Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02921/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02921-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

-1-

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KEVIN J. DEHOFF, ESQ., SB No. 252106

 Email: kdehoff@akk-law.com

AMIE MCTAVISH, ESQ., SB No. 242372

 Email: amctavish@akk-law.com

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

Attorneys at Law

601 University Avenue, Suite 150

Sacramento, CA 95825

Telephone: (916) 564-6100

Telecopier: (916) 564-6263

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF YOLO (also sued erroneously herein as YOLO 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT and YOLO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT), 

L. GARCIA, J. CEJA, J. LAZARO, M. NEVIS, and V. BIGELOW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THERESA MARIE NIESEN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

L. GARCIA, YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPUTY; J. CEJA, YOLO COUNTY 

SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; J. LAZARO, YOLO 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; M. NEVIS, 

YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; 

OFFICER BIGELOW, ANIMAL CONTROL 

OFFICER FOR YOLO COUNTY; YOLO 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; 

YOLO COUNTY PROBATION 

DEPARTMENT, and Does 1 through 50, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:14-cv-02921-WBS-DAD

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR 

HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

THEREON

WHEREAS Defendants COUNTY OF YOLO (also sued erroneously herein as YOLO 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT and YOLO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT), 

L. GARCIA, J. CEJA, J. LAZARO, and M. NEVIS responded to the complaint by filing a 

motion to dismiss, which is set to be heard on April 20, 2015.

WHEREAS the motion has been fully briefed by the parties.

Case 2:14-cv-02921-WBS-DB Document 13 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 3
-2-

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS Plaintiff Niesen’s counsel is scheduled to begin a jury trial beginning on 

April 20, 2015, which is estimated to last four weeks.

WHEREAS Defendants have agreed to move the scheduled hearing for the motion to 

dismiss until the first available court date May 18, 2015 onward in light of Plaintiff’s counsel’s 

unavailability.

WHEREAS the parties had previously agreed to serve initial disclosures in this matter on 

or before April 8, 2015. 

WHEREAS Plaintiff was unable to serve initial disclosures by the previously agreed 

upon deadline.

WHEREAS Plaintiff has agreed to provide initial disclosures on or before April 24, 2015 

negating the need for Defendants to file a motion to compel pursuant to FRCP 37(a)(1).

THE PARTIES THEREFORE, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE 

ATTORNEYS OF RECORD MAKE THE FOLLOWING STIPULATED REQUEST:

1. The hearing for the motion to dismiss currently scheduled for April 20, 2015 is 

hereby moved until the first available court day May 18, 2015 at 2:30 p.m..

2. Plaintiff agrees to provide her FRCP 26(a)(1)(A) initial disclosures on or before 

April 24, 2015. 

Dated: April 15, 2015

LAW OFFICES OF JULIA M. YOUNG

 /s/ Julia M. Young

 [as authorized on 4/15/15]

By:_________________________________

JULIA M. YOUNG

Attorney for Plaintiff THERESA MARIE 

NIESEN

Dated: April 15, 2015 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

Case 2:14-cv-02921-WBS-DB Document 13 Filed 04/15/15 Page 2 of 3
-3-

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 /s/ Kevin J. Dehoff

By:_________________________________

KEVIN J. DEHOFF

AMIE McTAVISH

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF 

YOLO, L. GARCIA, J. CEJA, J. 

LAZARO, M. NEVIS, and V. 

BIGELOW

ORDER OF THE COURT

No oral argument will be necessary. The court will take the motion 

under submission without oral argument. The 4/20/2015 hearing is vacated, and no appearance 

is necessary. 

Dated: April 15, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-02921-WBS-DB Document 13 Filed 04/15/15 Page 3 of 3