Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00113/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00113-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANVIL K. BELL, III,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0113 RRB DAD P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed April 24, 2007, plaintiff was ordered to file, within thirty days, a

properly completed in forma pauperis application and certified copy of plaintiff’s prison trust

account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. 

On May 3, 2007, the order was re-served on plaintiff at his last known address. Plaintiff was

cautioned that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed. The time period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an in forma

pauperis affidavit and certified copy of plaintiff’s prison trust account statement, or otherwise

responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action

be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

Case 2:07-cv-00113-JKS-DAD Document 12 Filed 06/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 26, 2007.

DAD:lg

bell0113.fifp

Case 2:07-cv-00113-JKS-DAD Document 12 Filed 06/26/07 Page 2 of 2