Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-06946/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-06946-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)

pandre@kramerlevin.com

LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)

lkobialka@kramerlevin.com

JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)

jhannah@kramerlevin.com

AUSTIN MANES (State Bar No. 284065)

amanes@kramerlevin.com

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & 

FRANKEL LLP

990 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 752-1700

Facsimile: (650) 752-1800

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FINJAN, INC.

SONAL N. MEHTA (SBN 222086)

smehta@durietangri.com

JOSEPH C. GRATZ (SBN 240676)

jgratz@durietangri.com

SONALI D. MAITRA (SBN 254896)

smaitra@durietangri.com

ANDREW L. PERITO (SBN 269995)

aperito@durietangri.com

DURIE TANGRI LLP

217 Leidesdorff Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 362-6666

Facsimile: (415) 236-6300

Attorneys for Defendant

ZSCALER, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

FINJAN, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZSCALER, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

AMENDED STIPULATED 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 

This Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and 

the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or 

items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. As set forth 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

2

in Section 14.4 below, this Protective Order does not entitle the Parties to file confidential 

information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and 

the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material 

under seal.

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 

information or items under this Order.

2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 26(c). 

2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 

well as their support staff).

2.4 Designated House Counsel: House Counsel who seek access to “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information in this matter.

2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 

produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE 

CODE.”

2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 

medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 

testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 

responses to discovery in this matter.

2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 

the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or 

as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s 

competitor within the past 4 years, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an 

employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor.

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 2 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

3

2.8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or 

Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another 

Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by 

less restrictive means. 

2.9 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information or Items: shall 

mean non-public computer instructions, data structures, and data definitions expressed in a form 

suitable for input to an assembler, compiler, translator, or other data processing module, and 

associated comments and revision histories.

2.10 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 

Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.

2.11 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 

entity not named as a Party to this action.

2.12 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 

action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action 

on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party.

2.13 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 

consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).

2.14 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 

Material in this action.

2.15 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 

(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 

organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 

subcontractors.

2.16 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 

“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.” 

2.17 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 

Producing Party.

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 3 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

4

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined

above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, 

excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, 

or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the 

protections conferred by this Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information 

that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the 

public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a 

violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; 

and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the 

Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and 

under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at 

trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order.

4. DURATION

Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 

this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court 

order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all 

claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after 

the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 

including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 

applicable law.

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 

or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care 

to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. 

To the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate for protection only 

those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that 

other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 4 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

5

warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are 

shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary 

expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated 

for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection 

initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is 

withdrawing the mistaken designation.

5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order 

(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 

Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 

designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but 

excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing 

Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” to each page that contains 

protected material. 

A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection 

need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which 

material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all 

of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants 

copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, 

qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the 

Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 5 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

6

CODE”) to each page that contains Protected Material. 

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the 

Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other 

proceeding, or within 21 days thereafter in a written notice to the other Party, during which 

time—absent agreement otherwise by the Parties—any transcript shall be treated as if designated 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” all protected testimony and 

specify the level of protection being asserted. Only those portions of the testimony that are 

appropriately designated for protection within the 21 days shall be covered by the provisions of 

this Protective Order. Alternatively, a Designating Party may specify, at the deposition or up to 

21 days afterwards, that the entire transcript shall be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page 

that the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all 

pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material and 

the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall 

inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the 

expiration of a 21-day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been 

designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless 

otherwise agreed. After the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be treated only as 

actually designated.

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other 

tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container 

or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL,” 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 

– SOURCE CODE.” If only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, 

the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s) and specify 

the level of protection being asserted.

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 6 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

7

5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. An inadvertent failure to designate qualified 

information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure 

protection under this Order for such material. Upon correction of a designation, the Receiving 

Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the 

provisions of this Order.

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of 

confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality 

designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic 

burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to 

challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the 

original designation is disclosed.

6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution 

process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis 

for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written 

notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this 

specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in

good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other 

forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In 

conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality 

designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the 

designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, 

to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next 

stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or 

establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in

a timely manner.

6.3 Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court 

intervention, the Challenging Party shall file and serve a motion to change the confidentiality 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 7 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

8

under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) within 21 

days of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and 

confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each such motion must be 

accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet 

and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by the Challenging Party to 

make such a motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or 14 days, if applicable) 

shall automatically waive the confidentiality challenge for each challenged designation. Any 

motion brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration 

affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the 

preceding paragraph.

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating 

Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose 

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to 

sanctions. All parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to 

which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the court rules on the challenge.

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or 

produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, 

defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to 

the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has 

been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 15 below (FINAL 

DISPOSITION).

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and 

in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.

7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered 

by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any 

information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 8 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

9

employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the 

information for this litigation;

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving 

Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and 

Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(d) the court and its personnel;

(e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and 

Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation;

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably 

necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), 

unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed 

deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately 

bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this 

Protective Order.

(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or 

other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” and 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information or Items. Unless otherwise 

ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may 

disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” only to:

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as 

employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the 

information for this litigation;

(c) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 9 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

10

this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit 

A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4(a)(2), below, have been 

followed;

(d) the court and its personnel;

(e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and 

Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; and

(f) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or 

other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

7.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 

– ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” 

Information or Items to Designated House Counsel or Experts.

(a)(1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the Designating 

Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to Designated House Counsel any information or item that has 

been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” pursuant to 

paragraph 7.3(b) first must make a written request to the Designating Party that (1) sets forth the 

full name of the Designated House Counsel and the city and state of his or her residence and (2) 

describes the Designated House Counsel’s current and reasonably foreseeable future primary job 

duties and responsibilities in sufficient detail to determine if House Counsel is involved, or may 

become involved, in any competitive decision-making.

(a)(2) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the Designating 

Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this Order) any information or item 

that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” pursuant to paragraph 7.3(c) first must make a 

written request to the Designating Party that (1) identifies the general categories of “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE 

CODE” information that the Receiving Party seeks permission to disclose to the Expert, (2) sets 

forth the full name of the Expert and the city and state of his or her primary residence, (3) 

attaches a copy of the Expert’s current resume, (4) identifies the Expert’s current employer(s), (5) 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 10 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

11

identifies each person or entity from whom the Expert has received compensation or funding for 

work in his or her areas of expertise or to whom the expert has provided professional services, 

including in connection with a litigation, at any time during the preceding five years,1 and (6) 

identifies (by name and number of the case, filing date, and location of court) any litigation in 

connection with which the Expert has offered expert testimony, including through a declaration, 

report, or testimony at a deposition or trial, during the preceding five years.

(b) A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the 

preceding respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified 

Designated House Counsel or Expert unless, within 14 days of delivering the request, the Party 

receives a written objection from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in 

detail the grounds on which it is based. 

(c) A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with the 

Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by 

agreement within seven days of the written objection. If no agreement is reached, the Party 

seeking to make the disclosure to Designated House Counsel or the Expert may file a motion as 

provided in Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) 

seeking permission from the court to do so. Any such motion must describe the circumstances 

with specificity, set forth in detail the reasons why disclosure to Designated House Counsel or the 

Expert is reasonably necessary, assess the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail, and 

suggest any additional means that could be used to reduce that risk. In addition, any such motion 

must be accompanied by a competent declaration describing the parties’ efforts to resolve the 

matter by agreement (i.e., the extent and the content of the meet and confer discussions) and 

setting forth the reasons advanced by the Designating Party for its refusal to approve the 

disclosure. 

 

1 If the Expert believes any of this information is subject to a confidentiality obligation to a third- party, then the Expert should provide whatever information the Expert believes can be disclosed 

without violating any confidentiality agreements, and the Party seeking to disclose to the Expert 

shall be available to meet and confer with the Designating Party regarding any such engagement.

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 11 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

12

In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to Designated House Counsel or 

the Expert shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail 

(under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected 

Material to its Designated House Counsel or Expert.

8. PROSECUTION BAR

Absent written consent from the Producing Party, any individual who receives 

access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” information shall not be involved in the prosecution of 

patents or patent applications relating to the subject matter of this action, including without 

limitation the patents asserted in this action and any patent or application claiming priority to or 

otherwise related to the patents asserted in this action, before any foreign or domestic agency, 

including the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“the Patent Office”). For the purposes 

of this section, “prosecution” includes any involvement in or advising regarding drafting, editing, 

approving or amending patent claims. Prosecution includes, for example, original application, or 

involvement in or advising regarding drafting, editing, approving or amending patent claims in 

reissue and reexamination proceedings. “Prosecution” as used in this section does not include 

representing a party challenging a patent before a domestic or foreign agency (including, but not 

limited to, a reissue protest, ex parte reexamination or inter partes review). “Prosecution” as used 

in this section also does not include participation by such individual representing a patent-holder 

in a reissue protest, ex parte reexamination, or inter partes review, so long as the proceeding is 

not initiated by the patent-holder itself for any of its own patents, and so long as the individual 

has no involvement in and does not advise regarding drafting, editing, approving or amending 

claim language.2 No prohibition set forth in this paragraph shall apply to or result from any 

Protected Materials that such individual had lawfully received or authored prior to and apart from 

 

2

 Such individual may be involved in other activities such as reviewing, drafting or editing briefs, 

correspondence, or other materials in any reissue protest, ex parte reexamination, or inter partes

review, so long as the individual has no involvement in and does not advise regarding drafting, 

editing, approving or amending claim language. 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 12 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

13

this litigation, or to any other material not covered by this Stipulated Protective Order. This 

Prosecution Bar shall begin when access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” information is first received 

by the affected individual and shall end two (2) years after final termination of this action. 

9. SOURCE CODE

(a) To the extent production of source code becomes necessary in this case, a 

Producing Party may designate source code as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” 

if it comprises or includes confidential, proprietary or trade secret source code.

(b) Protected Material designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE 

CODE” shall be subject to all of the protections afforded to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information, including the Prosecution Bar set forth in Paragraph 

8, and may be disclosed only to the individuals to whom “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information may be disclosed, as set forth in Paragraphs 7.3 and 

7.4, with the exception of Designated House Counsel.

(c) Any source code produced in discovery shall be made available for inspection, in a 

format allowing it to be reasonably reviewed and searched, during normal business hours or at 

other mutually agreeable times, at an office of the Producing Party’s counsel or another mutually 

agreed upon location. The source code shall be made available for inspection on a secured 

computer in a secured room without Internet access or network access to other computers, and the 

Receiving Party shall not copy, remove, or otherwise transfer any portion of the source code onto 

any recordable media or recordable device. The Producing Party may visually monitor the 

activities of the Receiving Party’s representatives during any source code review, but only to 

ensure that there is no unauthorized recording, copying, or transmission of the source code.

(d) The Receiving Party may request paper copies of limited portions of source code 

that are reasonably necessary for the preparation of court filings, pleadings, expert reports, or 

other papers, or for deposition or trial, but shall not request paper copies for the purpose of 

reviewing the source code other than electronically as set forth in paragraph (c) in the first 

instance. Such limited portions of Source Code shall not exceed 25 contiguous printed pages, or 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 13 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

14

an aggregate total of more than 350 pages, of Source Code during the duration of the case, 

without prior consent from the Producing Party or further order of the Court. The Producing 

Party shall provide all such source code in paper form, including bates numbers and the label 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.” The Producing Party may challenge the 

amount of source code requested in hard copy form pursuant to the dispute resolution procedure 

and timeframes set forth in Paragraph 6 whereby the Producing Party is the “Challenging Party” 

and the Receiving Party is the “Designating Party” for purposes of dispute resolution.

(e) The Receiving Party shall maintain a record of any individual who has inspected 

any portion of the source code in electronic or paper form. The Receiving Party shall maintain all 

paper copies of any printed portions of the source code in a secured, locked area within offices of 

the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this District. The Receiving Party shall not 

create any electronic or other images of the paper copies and shall not convert any of the 

information contained in the paper copies into any electronic format. The Receiving Party shall 

only make additional paper copies if such additional copies are (1) necessary to prepare court 

filings, pleadings, or other papers (including a testifying expert’s expert report), (2) necessary for 

deposition, or (3) otherwise necessary for the preparation of its case. Any paper copies used 

during a deposition shall be retrieved by the Producing Party at the end of each day and must not 

be given to or left with a court reporter or any other unauthorized individual.

10. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER 

LITIGATION

If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels 

disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 

– SOURCE CODE,” that Party must: 

(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a 

copy of the subpoena or court order; 

(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in 

the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 14 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

15

this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Protective Order; and 

(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the 

Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.3

If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the 

subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as 

“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” before a determination by the court from 

which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s 

permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that 

court of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions should be construed as 

authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from 

another court. 

11. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS 

LITIGATION

(a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in 

this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.” Such 

information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the 

remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as 

prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. 

(b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a 

Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement 

with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall: 

1. promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that 

some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-

 

3

 The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this 

Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to protect 

its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 15 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

16

Party;

2. promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Protective Order in this 

litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the 

information requested; and 

3. make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party. 

(c) If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court within 14 

days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce the 

Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely 

seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession 

or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a 

determination by the court.

4

 Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the 

burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material. 

12. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Protective Order, the 

Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized 

disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) 

inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this 

Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to 

Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

13. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED 

MATERIAL

When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently 

produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the 

Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This 

 

4 The purpose of this provision is to alert the interested parties to the existence of confidentiality 

rights of a Non-Party and to afford the Non-Party an opportunity to protect its confidentiality 

interests in this court.

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 16 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

17

provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery 

order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a 

communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product 

protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in a stipulated protective order submitted 

to the court.

14. MISCELLANEOUS

14.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to 

seek its modification by the court in the future.

14.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. No Party waives any right it otherwise would 

have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in 

this Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in 

evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order.

14.3 Export Control. Disclosure of Protected Material shall be subject to all applicable 

laws and regulations relating to the export of technical data contained in such Protected Material, 

including the release of such technical data to foreign persons or nationals in the United States or 

elsewhere. The Producing Party shall be responsible for identifying any such controlled technical 

data, and the Receiving Party shall take measures necessary to ensure compliance.

14.4 Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party 

or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in 

the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 

Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed 

under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at 

issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request 

establishing that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or 

otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected 

Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) is denied by the court, then the 

Receiving Party may file the Protected Material in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 17 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

18

79-5(e)(2) unless otherwise instructed by the court.

15. FINAL DISPOSITION

Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each 

Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such 

material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, 

compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected 

Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must 

submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the 

Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all 

the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has 

not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or 

capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to 

retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, 

legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work 

product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected 

Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to 

this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).

///

///

///

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 18 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

19

DATED: June 18, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Austin Manes 

Paul Andre (State Bar. No. 196585)

Lisa Kobialka (State Bar No. 191404)

James Hannah (State Bar No. 237978)

Austin Manes (State Bar No. 284065)

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP

990 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 752-1700

Facsimile: (650) 752-1800

pandre@kramerlevin.com

lkobialka@kramerlevin.com

jhannah@kramerlevin.com

amanes@kramerlevin.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FINJAN, INC.

DATED: June 18, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Andrew L. Perito

Andrew L. Perito (SBN 269995)

Sonal N. Mehta (SBN 222086)

Joseph C. Gratz (SBN 240676)

Sonali D. Maitra (SBN 254896)

DURIE TANGRI LLP

217 Leidesdorff Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 362-6666

Facsimile: (415) 236-6300

smehta@durietangri.com

jgratz@durietangri.com

smaitra@durietangri.com

aperito@durietangri.com

Counsel for Defendants

ZSCALER, INC.

ATTESTATION

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.

 By: /s/ Austin Manes 

Austin Manes (State Bar No. 284065)

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 19 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________

Judge Jon S. Tigar

United States District/Magistrate Judge

June 19, 2018

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 20 of 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No.: 3:17-cv-06946-JST

21

EXHIBIT A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of 

_________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read 

in its entirety and understand the Protective Order that was issued by the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of California on _______ [date] in the case of ___________ 

[insert formal name of the case and the number and initials assigned to it by the court]. I 

agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Protective Order, and I understand 

and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the 

nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or 

item that is subject to this Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance 

with the provisions of this Order.

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for 

the Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Protective Order, 

even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 

_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone

number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any 

proceedings related to enforcement of this Protective Order.

Date: _________________________________

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________

Printed name: ______________________________

[printed name]

Signature: __________________________________

[signature]

Case 3:17-cv-06946-JST Document 50 Filed 06/19/18 Page 21 of 21