Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-01005/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-01005-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to

portions of the Report and Recommendation. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739

(7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Trans Advantage, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Pinos Altos Group, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 14-1005-TUC-FRZ (JR)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States

Magistrate Judge Rateau that recommends granting Plaintiff’s motion for remand.1

 As

Defendants’ objections do not undermine the analysis and proper conclusion reached by

Magistrate Judge Rateau, Defendants’ objections are rejected and the Report and

Recommendation is adopted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) is accepted and adopted.

(2) Plaintiff’s motion for remand is granted. This action is remanded to its original forum

in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, Cause No. 13SL-CC-03951.

Case 4:14-cv-01005-FRZ-JR Document 18 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

(3) Defendants’ “request for leave of court to file a motion to dismiss” (Doc. 15) is denied.

(4) The Clerk of the Court shall close the file in this case.

DATED this 16th day of May, 2014.

Case 4:14-cv-01005-FRZ-JR Document 18 Filed 05/19/14 Page 2 of 2