Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02658/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02658-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER GRANTING ADMIN MOTION

TO REQUIRE COMPLETE SERVICE OF TAC

C-08-02658-RMW (HRL)

I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985)

nchatterjee@orrick.com

G. HOPKINS GUY, III (STATE BAR NO. 124811)

hopguy@orrick.com

THERESA A. SUTTON (STATE BAR NO. 211857)

tsutton@orrick.com

NITIN GAMBHIR (STATE BAR NO. 259906)

ngambhir@orrick.com

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: 650-614-7400

Facsimile: 650-614-7401

Attorneys for Defendant

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KHARAGPUR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

M.A. MOBILE LTD., a limited liability

company chartered in Dominica; and 

MANDANA D. FARHANG,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 

KHARAGPUR, an Indian Institute of 

Technology incorporated under the “Institutes 

of Technology Act, 1961”; TECHNOLOGY 

ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND TRAINING 

SOCIETY, an Indian society; PARTHA P. 

CHAKRABARTI; PALLAB DASGUPTA; 

RAKESH GUPTA; PRAVANJAN 

CHOUDHRY; SUBRAT PANDA; 

ANIMESH NASKAR; and DOES 1 through 

100, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. C-08-02658-RMW (HRL)

ORDER GRANTING 

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF 

TECHNOLOGY, KHARAGPUR’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

REQUIRE PLAINTIFFS TO 

COMPLY WITH FED.R.CIV.P. 4 

AND GENERAL ORDER NO. 62, 

AND SETTING TIME TO RESPOND 

TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Dept: Courtroom 6, 4th Floor

Judge: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 160 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 

 ORDER GRANTING ADMIN MOTION

TO REQUIRE COMPLETE SERVICE OF TAC

C-08-02658-RMW (HRL)

Having considered Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur’s Administrative Motion to 

Require Plaintiffs to Comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and General Order No. 62, and Setting Time to 

Respond to Complaint, and all papers in opposition thereto,

Good Cause appearing therefore, IIT’s Motion is GRANTED. After entry of a Stipulated

Protective Order, Plaintiffs must serve IIT with all exhibits attached to and incorporated in the 

Third Amended Complaint, after which IIT shall respond to the Third Amended Complaint

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 6, 2010

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

. 

Case 3:08-cv-02658-WHO Document 160 Filed 07/06/10 Page 2 of 2