Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01271/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01271-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

1

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Stipulation re Filing Dates of Filing Plaintiffs’ Oppositions and Defendants’ Replies

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SEIBERT & BAUTISTA

SHANNON SEIBERT (State Bar No. 240317)

JOE BAUTISTA (State Bar No. 255708)

18711 Tiffeni Drive #17-129

Twain Harte, California 95383

Telephone: 209.586.2890

Facsimile: 888.874.8107

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

MAYALL HURLEY

A Professional Corporation

J. ANTHONY ABBOTT (State Bar No. 83975)

JOHANNE C. MEDINA (State Bar No. 258973)

2453 Grand Canal Blvd., 2nd Floor

Stockton, CA 95207

Telephone: 209.477.3833

Facsimile: 209.473.4818

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN C. OYARZO and NICHOLAS 

HART,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

TUOLUMNE FIRE DISTRICT (A.K.A. 

“TUOLUMNE FIRE PROTECTION 

DISTRICT”), JOSEPH TURNER, in his 

individual and official capacities, DARLENE 

HUTCHINS, in her individual and official 

capacities, KENNETH HOCKETT, in his 

individual and official capacities, BRIAN 

MACHADO, in his individual and official 

capacities, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, 

Inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2:11-CV-01271-LJO-SAB

STIPULATION RE FILING DATES 

FOR PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITIONS 

TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO ALLOW 

FOR CONSOLIDATION OF 

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITIONS

[Consolidated Action: 1:11-cv-01272-LJODLB]

Case 1:11-cv-01271-SAB Document 80 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 3
2

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Stipulation re Filing Dates of Filing Plaintiffs’ Oppositions and Defendants’ Replies

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED between Benjamin C. Oyarzo and Nicholas 

Hart, by and through their attorney, Shannon Seibert of Seibert & Bautista, and Defendants TFD, 

Joseph Turner, Darlene Hutchins, Kenneth Hockett, and Brian Machado, by and through their 

attorney, J. Anthony Abbott of Mayall Hurley, A Professional Corporation, as follows: 

1. The date by which Plaintiffs must file their opposition to Kenneth Hockett’s, Darlene 

Hutchins’, and Joseph Turner’s motions for summary judgment is extended to May 16, 

2013;

2. Plaintiffs will file one consolidated opposition not to exceed 50 pages to Kenneth 

Hockett’s, Darlene Hutchins’, and Joseph Turner’s motions for summary judgment; 

3. Plaintiffs will file one consolidated Response to the Separate Statements of Undisputed 

Facts filed by Kenneth Hockett, Darlene Hutchins, and Joseph Turner;

4. The date by which Plaintiffs must file their oppositions to Defendant Tuolumne Fire 

Districts’ motions for summary judgment is extended to May 23, 2013; 

5. The date by which Defendant TFD must file its replies to Plaintiffs’ oppositions is 

extended to May 31, 2013; 

6. All other deadlines for filing of oppositions and replies remain as previously stipulated to 

by the parties and ordered by the Court. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

DATED: May 14, 2013 SEIBERT & BAUTISTA

BY: /s/ Shannon Seibert 

Shannon Seibert

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: May 14, 2013 MAYALL, HURLEY, P.C. 

BY: /s/ J. Anthony Abbott 

J. Anthony Abbott

Attorneys for Defendants

////

////

Case 1:11-cv-01271-SAB Document 80 Filed 05/14/13 Page 2 of 3
3

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Stipulation re Filing Dates of Filing Plaintiffs’ Oppositions and Defendants’ Replies

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The stipulation of the parties having been considered, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 14, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC _Signature- END:

b2e55c0d

Case 1:11-cv-01271-SAB Document 80 Filed 05/14/13 Page 3 of 3