Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00878/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00878-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD CATHERINE,

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-0878 MCE CKD PS

ORDER

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

Calendared for hearing on June 29, 2016 is defendant’s motion to dismiss. No opposition to the 

motion has been filed. 

Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed 

fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party will 

be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the 

motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 230(i) provides that 

failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in 

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be 

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 

inherent power of the Court.”

/////

Case 2:16-cv-00878-MCE-CKD Document 8 Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of June 29, 2016 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s motion is 

continued to July 20, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 24.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion no later than June 29, 2016. Failure 

to file opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in submission 

of the motion on the papers and a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

3. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than July 6, 2016.

Dated: June 17, 2016

4 catherine0878.nop

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-00878-MCE-CKD Document 8 Filed 06/17/16 Page 2 of 2