Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00862/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00862-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS POLK, et al.,

PlaintiffS,

v.

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) N.A.,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-0862 MCE CKD

ORDER

The parties have submitted a stipulation and proposed order regarding enforcement of 

subpoenas served on non-parties to the instant action. The stipulation and proposed order were 

not served on the responding non-parties. There is no indication in the parties’ stipulation 

whether subpoenaed non-parties Equifax, Inc. and TransUnion have responded to the subpoenas 

or their position on producing the documents requested under the subpoenas. The subpoenas at 

issue call for production in Los Angeles, California, Atlanta, Georgia and Chicago, Illinois. As 

such, any motion to compel compliance with the subpoenas at issue is not properly brought in the 

Eastern District of California. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(2)(B)(i). In light of the above defects 

evident in the parties’ stipulation, the court declines to enter the proposed order.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:15-cv-00862-MCE-CKD Document 14 Filed 03/25/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the proposed order (ECF 13-1) is denied 

without prejudice.

Dated: March 25, 2016

4 polk0862.subp.den

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00862-MCE-CKD Document 14 Filed 03/25/16 Page 2 of 2