Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00251/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00251-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JARED KRISTOPHER RYSEDORPH,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:23-cv-00251-KES-BAM (PC)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE 

DISCOVERY CUTOFF AND DISPOSITIVE 

MOTION DEADLINES BY 90 DAYS

(ECF No. 46)

Discovery Deadline: May 21, 2025

Dispositive Motion Deadline: July 30, 2025

Plaintiff Jared Kristopher Rysedorph (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and 

in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds 

on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendants Le and Banerjee for deliberate 

indifference to medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

Pursuant to the Court’s June 20, 2024 discovery and scheduling order, the deadline for 

completion of discovery is February 20, 2025, and the deadline for filing all dispositive motions

(other than a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust) is May 1, 2025. (ECF No. 41.)

Currently before the Court is Defendants’ stipulated motion to continue discovery cutoff 

and dispositive motion deadlines by 90 days, filed January 9, 2025. (ECF No. 46.) Defendants 

state that the requested extension would benefit both parties because Plaintiff intends to serve 

discovery and expects to be released from custody in the next 40 days, and defense counsel has 

Case 1:23-cv-00251-KES-BAM Document 47 Filed 01/10/25 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

been unable to find a relevant medical expert, preventing Defendants from engaging in discovery 

and preparing for Plaintiff’s deposition. The parties spoke telephonically on December 30, 2024, 

when Plaintiff agreed to a 90-day extension of the discovery cutoff and dispositive motion 

deadline. (Id.)

Plaintiff has not yet had an opportunity to file a response, but the Court finds a response is 

unnecessary in light of defense counsel’s declaration that Plaintiff agreed to the requested 

extension. The motion is deemed submitted. Local Rule 230(l).

Having considered the request, the Court finds good cause to grant the stipulated 

modification of the scheduling order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).

Plaintiff is reminded that he is responsible for providing the Court with an updated 

mailing address when he is transferred to a new institution or released from custody.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ stipulated motion to continue discovery cutoff and dispositive motion 

deadlines by 90 days, (ECF No. 46), is GRANTED, as follows:

a. The deadline for completion of all discovery is extended from February 20, 2025

to May 21, 2025; and

b. The deadline for filing all dispositive motions (other than a motion for summary 

judgment for failure to exhaust) is extended from May 1, 2025 to July 30, 2025;

and

2. A request for an extension of a deadline set in this order must be filed on or before 

the expiration of the deadline in question and will only be granted on a showing of 

good cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2025 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:23-cv-00251-KES-BAM Document 47 Filed 01/10/25 Page 2 of 2