Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04296/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04296-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NEWYORK 6297756 (2K) 

STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME 

TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 

No. C 07-4296 MJJ 

WHITE & CASE LLP 

BRYAN A. MERRYMAN (SBN 134357) 

633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1900 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007 

Tel: (213) 620-7700 

Fax: (213) 687-0758 

bmerryman@whitecase.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Saudi Refining, Inc. 

GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A. 

DANIEL R. SHULMAN 

500 IDS Center, 80 South Eighth Street 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 

Tel: (612) 632-3335 

Fax: (612) 632-4335 

daniel.shulman@gpmlaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MIKE M. MADANI, RICK-MIK, INC., 

OYSTER PETROLEUM, INC., M.R. 

OYSTER, INC., HABIB ENTERPRISES, 

INC., HABIB PETROLEUM, INC., 

CALLAWAY OIL, INC., STEVEN GROSSI, 

STEPHEN SCHLABS, ANNIE SCHLABS, 

SOOY, INC., GREGOIRE DUKMAJIAN, 

WILLIAM REED, SAMIR BAHOUTH, 

ARTHUR SALDANA, AMRITA DHILLON, 

AMOUNA, INC., KEITH FULLINGTON, 

ASHKAN CORPORATION, GEORGE 

RABADI, PAUL ENSTAD, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

SHELL OIL COMPANY, CHEVRON 

CORPORATION, AND SAUDI REFINING, 

INC., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

Case No. C 07-4296 MJJ 

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

DEFENDANT SAUDI REFINING, INC.’S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO THE 

COMPLAINT 

 

Case 3:07-cv-04296-MJJ Document 19 Filed 10/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NEWYORK 6297756 (2K) 

-1- STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME 

TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 

 WHEREAS Defendant Saudi Refining, Inc. (“Defendant”) must answer or otherwise respond 

to the Complaint in this action within 20 days of being served with the Summons and Complaint; 

 WHEREAS Defendant needs additional time to answer or otherwise respond to the 

Complaint; and 

 WHEREAS the Plaintiffs have agreed to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to the 

Complaint; 

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE through their respective attorneys of record that 

Defendant has until November 1, 2007 to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

Dated: October 8, 2007 GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A. 

DANIEL R. SHULMAN 

By: /s/ Thomas P. Bleau for 

 Daniel R. Shulman 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Dated: October 10, 2007 WHITE & CASE LLP 

BRYAN A. MERRYMAN 

By: /s/ Bryan A. Merryman 

 Bryan A. Merryman 

Attorneys for Defendant Saudi Refining, Inc. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

10/16/07

Case 3:07-cv-04296-MJJ Document 19 Filed 10/17/07 Page 2 of 2