Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00733/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00733-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAVITARPAL SINGH,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ALFONSO LESESNE III, STEVENS 

TRANSPORT INC., and Does 1 through 25, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants,

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:15-cv-00733-SAB

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

THE DEADLINE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL 

EXPERT REPORTS AND REBUTTAL 

EXPERTS

(ECF No. 14)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Pavitarpal Singh and 

Defendants, Alfonso Lesesne III and Stevens Transport, by and through their respective 

counsel, that the deadlines for Supplemental Expert Witness Reports and Rebuttal Experts be 

extended until July 21, 2016. In addition, the last day for expert discovery is extended twenty 

five (25) days to August 5, 2016. The parties believe that good cause exist based on the 

declaration of Nathan S. Miller included herewith. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. MILLER & AYALA, LLP

Date: June 27, 2016 /s/ Nathan S. Miller

Nathan S. Miller, Attorneys for Plaintiff

Date: June 22, 2016 /s/Quentin Cedar

Quentin Cedar, Attorney for Defendants

Case 1:15-cv-00733-SAB Document 15 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF NATHAN S. MILLER

I, NATHAN S. MILLER, hereby declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney at law duly appointed to practice law in all courts in the 

State of California.

2. I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge, and if called as

a witness, I could and would competently testify as set forth below.

3. I am a partner with the law firm if Miller & Ayala, LLP and attorney of 

record for Plaintiff herein and make this declaration in support of the parties Stipulation to 

Extend the Date for Supplemental Expert Reports and Rebuttal Experts. 

4. The parties believe that good cause exist because Plaintiff and 

Defendants have a mediation set for June 24, 2016, at which time they are hopeful that they 

will be able to resolve this case without the need to incur additional expenses on experts. In 

addition, the Plaintiff and Defendants are in the process of executing a stipulation regarding 

liability which will obviate the need for experts relating to liability. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that 

the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in Fresno, California on this 22 day of June, 2016.

/s/ Nathan S. Miller

Nathan S. Miller, Attorneys for Plaintiff

\ \ \

\ \ \

\ \ \

\ \ \

\ \ \

Case 1:15-cv-00733-SAB Document 15 Filed 06/27/16 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing 

therefore:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff and Defendants’ Exchange for 

Supplemental Expert Reports and Rebuttal Expert Witnesses shall be extended until July 21, 

2016. In addition, the last day for expert discovery is extended twenty five (25) days to August

5, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00733-SAB Document 15 Filed 06/27/16 Page 3 of 3