Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-00574/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-00574-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Tennison v. CCSF, et al. 

Case No. C04-0574

1 C:\Documents and Settings\Workstation\Local Settings\Temp\notesF8C1A4\00401811.DOC

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Attorney 

SCOTT D. WIENER, State Bar #189266 

SHERRI SOKELAND KAISER, State Bar #197986 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN, State Bar #241755 

Deputy City Attorneys 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3800 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

AND GEORGE BUTTERWORTH 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOHN TENNISON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, EARL SANDERS, 

NAPOLEON HENDRIX AND GEORGE 

BUTTERWORTH, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 04-0574 CW 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CONTINUING FURTHER CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case 4:04-cv-00574-CW Document 506 Filed 10/02/06 Page 1 of 3
Tennison v. CCSF, et al. 

Case No. C04-0574

2 C:\Documents and Settings\Workstation\Local Settings\Temp\notesF8C1A4\00401811.DOC

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

RECITAL

This Court's Case Management Order of April 6, 2006, set a further case management 

conference in this matter for October 6, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. The Order noted, "If no decision is 

made by the Ninth Circuit [regarding pending appeals of this Court's partial denial of summary 

judgment motions to certain defendants] by October 6, 2006, the parties can stipulate to continue 

the Case Management Conference." Document 503 at 2. 

No decision has yet been made by the Ninth Circuit. Under the current briefing schedule 

for consolidated appeal Nos. 06-15260 and 06-15426, appellees' answering briefs are due 

December 18, 2006, and appellants' reply briefs are due March 5, 2007. The parties anticipate 

that the Ninth Circuit will hand down a decision no sooner than three months after briefing is 

complete. 

The parties therefore request that this Court continue the October 6, 2006 further case 

management conference to June 8, 2007, at 1:30 p.m.. Should the Ninth Circuit dispose of the 

appeal before that date, the parties will notify the Court so that the further case management 

conference may be advanced. 

STIPULATION

For the foregoing reason, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and 

agree to entry of an order continuing the further case management conference from October 6, 

2006, at 1:30 p.m., to June 8, 2007 at 1:30 p.m. 

Dated: September 28, 2006 

DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER 

Chief Trial Deputy 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN 

Deputy City Attorney 

By: /s/ 

 CHRISTINE VAN AKEN 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CCSF AND GEORGE BUTTERWORTH 

Case 4:04-cv-00574-CW Document 506 Filed 10/02/06 Page 2 of 3
Tennison v. CCSF, et al. 

Case No. C04-0574

3 C:\Documents and Settings\Workstation\Local Settings\Temp\notesF8C1A4\00401811.DOC

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: September 25, 2006 

 JAMES QUADRA, ESQ. 

 MOSCONE, EMBLIDGE & QUADRA, LLP 

By: /s/ 

JAMES QUADRA* 

Attorneys for Defendants EARL SANDERS and 

NAPOLEON HENDRIX 

Dated: September 27, 2006 

 ELLIOT R. PETERS, ESQ. 

 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By: /s/ 

ELLIOT R. PETERS* 

Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN TENNISON 

Dated: September 28, 2006 

 JOHN HOUSTON SCOTT, ESQ. 

 THE SCOTT LAW FIRM 

By: /s/ 

JOHN HOUSTON SCOTT* 

Attorneys for Plaintiff ANTOINE GOFF 

*The filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from the signatories.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the further case management 

conference in this matter is continued pursuant to the terms of the foregoing stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 10/2/06 

Dated: 

THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:04-cv-00574-CW Document 506 Filed 10/02/06 Page 3 of 3