Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00912/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00912-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26:7429 IRS: Tax Jeopardy Assessment

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

 1 

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM 

CASE NO. C-05-0912 MMC 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

DANIEL J. FURNISS (State Bar No. 73531) 

THOMAS F. FITZPATRICK (State Bar No. 193565) 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400 

Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Colmar Properties, LLC and Coleman D. Moore 

KEVIN V. RYAN (State Bar No. 118321) 

United States Attorney 

JAY R. WEILL (State Bar No. 75434) 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Chief, Tax Division 

10th Floor Federal Building 

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Telephone: (415) 436-7017 

Facsimile: (415) 436-6748 

Attorneys for Defendant 

United States of America 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

COLMAR PROPERTIES, LLC and 

COLEMAN D. MOORE, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL 

REVENUE SERVICE, 

Defendant.

 Case No. C-05-0912 MMC 

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION 

RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S 

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN 

SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS 

AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

 

 Plaintiff Colmar Properties, LLC and Defendant United States of America, by and through 

their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff be permitted up to and including April 24, 2006 

Case 3:05-cv-00912-MMC Document 37 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

 2 

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM 

CASE NO. C-05-0912 MMC 

to respond to Defendant's Supplemental Memorandum In Support of Motion To Dismiss and For 

Summary Judgment ("Supplemental Memorandum"), stating as follows: 

1. Defendant filed its Application for Permission to File its Supplemental Memorandum 

with the Court on March 21, 2006; 

2. On March 22, 2006, the Court granted Defendant's request to file the Supplemental 

Memorandum and ordered Plaintiff to file any opposition by March 31, 2006; 

3. Plaintiff's counsel is currently in trial, which is expected to last until mid-April, 2006. 

In light of Plaintiff's counsel heavy trial commitment, Plaintiff requested additional time to 

respond to the Supplemental Memorandum, up to and including April 24, 2006.

4. Defendant's counsel agreed to Plaintiff's request. 

5. The parties therefore stipulate that Plaintiff has up to and including April 24, 2006 to 

file any opposition to the Supplemental Memorandum. 

DATED: March 27, 2006 Respectfully submitted, 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

By: /S/ 

 DANIEL J. FURNISS 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Colmar Properties, LLC and Coleman D. Moore 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

By: /S/ 

 JAY R. WEILL 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 United States of America 

///

///

///

Case 3:05-cv-00912-MMC Document 37 Filed 03/28/06 Page 2 of 3
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

 3 

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM 

CASE NO. C-05-0912 MMC 

ORDER

 Based on the foregoing stipulation, Plaintiff Colmar Properties, LLC has up to and including 

April 24, 2006 to file any opposition to the Supplemental Memorandum, and Defendant may file a 

reply no later than May 5, 2006. As of May 5, 2006, the Court will take the matter under submission. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 DATED: March 28, 2006 

By: ______________________________________ 

 MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:05-cv-00912-MMC Document 37 Filed 03/28/06 Page 3 of 3