Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00544/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00544-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 through 304. 

On January 14, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 

recommendations to deny Petitioner’s motion for leave to file a 

second amended petition. The findings and recommendations were 

served on all parties on the same date. The findings and 

recommendations advised the parties that objections could be filed 

within thirty days and replies within fourteen days after the filing 

of objections. Although the thirty-day period for the filing of 

objections has passed, no objections have been filed.

COREY BURGESS,

 Petitioner,

v.

WARDEN HECTOR ALFONZO RIOS,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:12-cv-00544-AWI-SKO-HC

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 57)

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED 

PETITION (DOC. 49)

Case 1:12-cv-00544-AWI-SKO Document 62 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), 

this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having 

carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the report 

and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Thus, the Court will adopt the findings and recommendations in full.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1) The findings and recommendations filed on January 14, 2014, 

(Doc. No. 57) are ADOPTED in full; and

2) Petitioner’s motion for leave to file a second amended 

petition (Doc. No. 49) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 4, 2014 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00544-AWI-SKO Document 62 Filed 03/04/14 Page 2 of 2