Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05200/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05200-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

650 California Street 

20th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 

415.433.1940 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO 

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT 

CASE NO. 14-5200-EMC 

JOHN C. FISH, Jr., Bar No. 160620

jfish@littler.com 

ROD M. FLIEGEL, Bar No. 168289 

rfliegel@littler.com 

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998 

aspurchise@littler.com 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

650 California Street 

20th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94108.2693 

Telephone: 415.433.1940 

Facsimile: 415.399.8490 

Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and 

Rasier, LLC 

TINA WOLFSON, Bar No. 174806 

twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com 

ROBERT AHDOOT, Bar No. 172098 

rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com 

THEODORE W. MAYA, Bar No. 223242 

tmaya@ahdootwolfson.com 

BRADLEY K. KING, Bar No. 274399 

bking@ahdootwolfson.com 

AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 

16 Palm Ave. 

West Hollywood, CA 90069 

Telephone: 310.474.9111 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Abdul Kadir Mohamed 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; RASIER, 

LLC; HIREASE, LLC; and DOES 1-50, 

Defendant 

Case No. CV 14-5200 EMC 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO 

ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S 

COMPLAINT TO FEBRUARY 6, 2015 ON 

BEHALF OF DEFENDANTS UBER 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND RAISER, 

LLC 

Case 3:14-cv-05200-EMC Document 26 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 2
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

650 California Street 

20th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 

415.433.1940 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO 

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT 

1. CASE NO. 14-5200-EMC

 DEFENDANTS UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (“UBER”), RAISER, LLC (“RAISER”), 

AND PLAINTIFF HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The deadline for Defendants Uber and Rasier to answer, move, or otherwise respond 

to the Complaint in the above-entitled action serviced on Uber on December 16, 2014 and on Rasier 

on December 9, 2014, shall be extended to February 6, 2015, the Court permitting. The parties are 

requesting the extension of time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to afford the parties 

additional time to meet and confer regarding a proposed consolidated and modified briefing 

schedule, in light of Uber’s motion to compel arbitration in the related case of Gillette v. Uber 

Technologies, Inc., Case No. 3:14-cv-05241, and Defendants’ anticipated motion to compel 

arbitration in the captioned matter. On December 18, 2014, Uber and Rasier requested that the 

deadline be extended until January 30, 2015, which the Court previously granted. The instant 

extension is only for an additional week period, and therefore the requested modification would not 

interfere with the Court's schedule of this case. The case management conference in this matter will 

not take place until March 12, 2015. (Dkt. No. 17.) 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: January 30, 2015 

/s/ Rod M. Fliegel 

Rod M. Fliegel 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, 

Inc. and Rasier, LLC 

Dated: January 30, 2015 

/s/ Tina Wolfson 

Tina Wolfson 

AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Abdul Kadir Mohamed 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

_______________________ 

Edward M. Chen 

U.S. District Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:14-cv-05200-EMC Document 26 Filed 02/02/15 Page 2 of 2