Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04987/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-04987-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Stipulation and Order 

Van Zandt v. San Jose, et al 

U.S. District Court – Northern District of California 

Case No. 5:07-CV-04987-JF 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB: 159747 

DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ. CSB: 236458 

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL 

925 West Hedding Street 

San José, California 95126 

T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0203 

E: rpowell@rrpassociates.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(San Jose Division) 

THOMAS VAN ZANDT ) Case No. CV 07 – 04987 JF 

 ) 

Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER 

v. ) OF THE COURT RE: FILING 

) AMENDED COMPLAINT 

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., ) 

) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

Wherefore Plaintiff named employees of Defendant Professional Security 

Consultants as Doe Defendants 1 through 4 employees of Professional Security Consultants, 

because their identities were unknown to Plaintiff at the date of filing; 

Wherefore, Professional Security Consultants’ counsel indicated on or about April 7, 

2008 that, on information and belief, Does 1 and 2 are Ryan Scott and Daniel Garcia; and 

Wherefore, counsel believe they have learned the name of the woman who made a 

report alleging child molestation to Target and/or Professional Security Consultants. On 

counsel’s information and belief, that woman’s name is Samantha Fein; 

Wherefore, Plaintiff seeks to add causes of action for intentional infliction of 

emotional distress and violation of California Penal Code §11172, as against Ms. Fein, so that 

**E-filed 5/19/08**

Case 5:07-cv-04987-JF Document 31 Filed 05/19/08 Page 1 of 5
Stipulation and Order 

Van Zandt v. San Jose, et al 

U.S. District Court – Northern District of California 

Case No. 5:07-CV-04987-JF 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

all causes of action arising from the incident in question may be adjudicated in one 

proceeding. Counsel for Professional Security Consultants, the City of San Jose and its 

Defendant employees, and Westfield, LLC., have no objection to adding Plaintiff’s claims 

against Ms. Fein; and 

Wherefore, Counsel for Professional Security Consultants has not, as yet, been 

retained to represent any Defendant employees of Professional Security Consultants; 

The parties hereto, in consultation with and by and through their respective counsel, 

do hereby agree and stipulate as follows, and respectfully request that this Court order same: 

1. Plaintiff may e-file an amended complaint (proposed Second Amended 

Complaint attached) to name as Does 1 and 2 Ryan Scott and Daniel Garcia, and 

adding Plaintiff’s claims against Samantha Fein. 

2. Plaintiff may e-file the proposed Second Amended Complaint within 20 

days of receipt of this Stipulation signed by the Court. 

3. Defendants waive personal service of the Summons and Second Amended 

Complaint on behalf of all Defendants other than Scott, Garcia, and Fein, and 

authorize Defendants’ respective counsel accepting the e-filed version of the 

Second Amended Complaint as service on all Defendants other than Scott, Garcia, 

and Fein. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: 5/__/08 /s/ Dennis R. Ingols 

 DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

// 

Case 5:07-cv-04987-JF Document 31 Filed 05/19/08 Page 2 of 5
5 19

Case 5:07-cv-04987-JF Document 31 Filed 05/19/08 Page 3 of 5
Case 5:07-cv-04987-JF Document 31 Filed 05/19/08 Page 4 of 5
Case 5:07-cv-04987-JF Document 31 Filed 05/19/08 Page 5 of 5