Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01364/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01364-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

-1-

FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT

CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NATE A. GARHART (State Bar No. 196872)

nate@cobaltlaw.com

VIJAY K. TOKE (State Bar No. 215079)

vijay@cobaltlaw.com

COBALT LLP

918 Parker Street, Bldg. A21

Berkeley, CA 94710

Telephone: (510) 841-9800

Facsimile: (510) 295-2401

Attorney for Plaintiff

THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC

ROBERT A. WEIKERT (State Bar No. 121146)

rweikert@nixonpeabody.com

JOHN A. CHATOWSKI (State Bar No. 174471)

jchatowski@nixonpeabody.com

NIXON PEABODY LLP

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 984-8200

Facsimile: (415) 984-8300

Attorney for Defendant

CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC, a New York

Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMADEUS NORTH AMERICA, INC., a

Florida Corporation, CATHAY PACIFIC

AIRWAYS LTD., a Hong Kong

Corporation, KONINKLIJKE

LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ, N.V., a

Netherlands Antilles Corporation d/b/a KLM

ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES, JOHN LIM,

an individual d/b/a/ TRAVELS-WEB,

PRICELINE.COM LLC, a Delaware

Corporation and DOES 1-100,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-01364-RS

FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

FOR DEFENDANT CATHAY PACIFIC

AIRWAYS LTD. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL

COMPLAINT

Complaint filed: March 24, 2015

Complaint served: May 21, 2015

Original Response

due: June 11, 2015

Response due by

First stipulation: July 13, 2015

Response due by

this stipulation: July 31, 2015

ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-01364-RS Document 31 Filed 07/09/15 Page 1 of 3
-2-

FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT

CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 5 and 6-1(a), it is HEREBY STIPULATED by and

between Plaintiff THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant CATHAY PACIFIC

AIRWAYS LTD. (“Defendant”), that Defendant shall have up to and including July 31, 2015 to

answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, including but not limited to a challenge as to

service, jurisdiction and/or venue.

WHEREAS, this is the second extension of Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint.

The parties previously stipulated to an extension for Defendant to respond to the Complaint from

June 11, 2015 to July 13, 2015. [Dkt. No. 18].

WHEREAS, the parties believe that a further extension of time for Defendant to respond to

the Complaint up to and including July 31, 2015, will not alter the date of any event or any deadline

already fixed by the Court.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through

their respective counsel, that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by no

later than July 31, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: July 8, 2015 COBALT LLP

By /s/ Vijay K. Toke

Vijay K. Toke

Attorneys for Plaintiff

THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC

Dated: July 8, 2015 NIXON PEABODY LLP

By /s/ Robert A. Weikert

Robert A. Weikert

Attorney for Defendant

CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD.

Case 3:15-cv-01364-RS Document 31 Filed 07/09/15 Page 2 of 3
-3-

FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT

CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4820-0324-1509.1

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE

I, Robert A. Weikert, attest that I am one of the attorneys for Defendant Cathay Pacific

Airways Ltd., and as the ECF user and filer of this document, I attest that pursuant to United States

District Court, Northern District of California, Civil L.R. 5-l(i)(3), concurrence in the filing of this

document has been obtained from Vijay K. Toke, the above signatory.

Dated: July 8, 2015

By /s/ Robert A. Weikert

Robert A. Weikert

ORDER

PURSUANT TO ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July ___, 2015 ________________________________

Hon. Richard Seeborg

United States District Court Judge

9

Case 3:15-cv-01364-RS Document 31 Filed 07/09/15 Page 3 of 3