Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca9-12-56783/USCOURTS-ca9-12-56783-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID TOURGEMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COLLINS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,

DBA Precision Recovery Analytics,

Inc., a Texas corporation; NELSON &

KENNARD, a partnership; PARAGON

WAY, INC.; COLLINS FINANCIAL

SERVICES USA, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LP,

Defendant.

No. 12-56783

D.C. No.

3:08-cv-01392-

CAB-NLS

ORDER

Filed October 31, 2014

Before: Jerome Farris and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit

Judges, and Paul L. Friedman, District Judge.*

* The Honorable Paul L. Friedman, District Judge, U.S. District Court

for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation.

 Case: 12-56783, 10/31/2014, ID: 9296838, DktEntry: 56, Page 1 of 4
2 TOURGEMAN V. COLLINS FINANCIAL SERVS.

ORDER

The opinion filed June 25, 2014 is AMENDED as

follows:

1. At page 4 of the slip opinion, the following sentence is

deleted:

We now reverse and hold that judgment

should be entered for Tourgeman.

and replaced with:

We now reverse.

2. At page 24 of the slip opinion, the following sentence is

deleted:

Accordingly, the appellant is entitled to

judgment on his claims against Paragon Way

under subsections 1692e(2) and e(10).

3. At page 30 of the slip opinion, the following sentence is

deleted:

These conclusions are sufficient to warrant

both reversal of the judgment granted to

Nelson & Kennard and entry of judgment in

favor of Tourgeman.

and replaced with:

 Case: 12-56783, 10/31/2014, ID: 9296838, DktEntry: 56, Page 2 of 4
TOURGEMAN V. COLLINS FINANCIAL SERVS. 3

These conclusions are sufficient to warrant

reversal of the judgment granted to Nelson &

Kennard.

4. At pages 30–31 of the slip opinion, the following

sentence is deleted:

For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that

the judgment of the district court granting

judgment to Collins, Paragon Way, and

Nelson & Kennard must be reversed, and that

judgment should instead be entered for

Tourgeman against Paragon Way and Nelson

& Kennard.

and replaced with:

For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that

the judgment of the district court granting

judgment to Collins, Paragon Way, and

Nelson & Kennard must be reversed.

5. At page 31 of the slip opinion, the following sentence is

deleted:

We express no view regarding whether

Tourgeman is entitled to judgment against

Collins itself, as Tourgeman’s claims against

that entity were based on a theory of vicarious

liability that was neither decided by the

district court nor briefed on this appeal.

With this amendment, JudgesHurwitz and Friedman have

voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Farris did not

 Case: 12-56783, 10/31/2014, ID: 9296838, DktEntry: 56, Page 3 of 4
4 TOURGEMAN V. COLLINS FINANCIAL SERVS.

vote. Judge Hurwitz voted to deny the petition for rehearing

en banc, Judge Friedman so recommends, and Judge Farris

made no recommendation.

The full court has been advised of the petition for

rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on

whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en

banc, filed August 13, 2014, are DENIED. No further

petition for rehearing and/or petition for rehearing en banc

may be filed.

 Case: 12-56783, 10/31/2014, ID: 9296838, DktEntry: 56, Page 4 of 4