Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-01885/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-01885-78/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS PATENT 

LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS 

Case No. 18-cv-01885-HSG 

ORDER REGARDING ASUS’S AND 

PHILIPS’S MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

DAUBERT MOTIONS 

Re: Dkt. Nos. 724, 751, 711, 713, 766, 742 

 

On this date, the Court entered an Order, under seal, that granted in part and denied in part 

ASUS’s motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 724) and denied Philips’s motion for 

partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 751). The Court separately entered an Order, under seal, 

addressing the parties’ Daubert motions. Dkt. Nos. 711, 713, 766, 742. Each of these Orders 

contains information the parties sought to be sealed in their briefing. 

In light of the “strong presumption in favor of [public] access,” the Court will file an 

unsealed version of these Orders no later than May 13, 2020. See Kamakana v. City & Cty. of 

Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). The summary judgment Order will not be 

redacted unless the parties file a joint statement by May 6, 2020 articulating compelling reasons to 

seal portions of the Order that outweigh the public interest in disclosure. See id. The statement 

shall attach a proposed redacted version of the Order. As to the Daubert Order, the parties 

(including any third party) may meet and confer and file a joint statement by May 6, 2020 

identifying any portion of the Order for which good cause to seal exists. The statement shall 

articulate specific harm or prejudice that will occur if the information is disclosed. Phillips ex rel. 

Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210–11 (9th Cir. 2002). A proposed 

Case 4:18-cv-01885-HSG Document 976 Filed 04/13/20 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

redacted version of the Order shall be attached. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 13, 2020 

 

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:18-cv-01885-HSG Document 976 Filed 04/13/20 Page 2 of 2