Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00272/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00272-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

E-mail: tanya@moorelawfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Robert Kalani

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT KALANI,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ERNEST A. FEDERICO, dba PERKO’S 

CAFE, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 2:13-cv-00272-WBS-CKD

STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF 

LEAVE TO FILE HIS FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIM.

)

)

)

)

)

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Robert Kalani (“Plaintiff”), seeks to amend his complaint to 

allege additional access barriers which relate to his disability which were identified at a site 

inspection of the subject property by Plaintiff, which took place on September 27, 2013;

WHEREAS, the Ninth Circuit both urges and requires Plaintiff to identify in his 

complaint all barriers identified which relate to his disability. Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports 

(U.S.) Inc., 631 F.3d 939, 944 (9th Cir. 2011); Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903, 

909 (9th Cir. 2011);

WHEREAS, the Parties have not commenced discovery, other than the inspection of 

the subject property by Plaintiff;

Case 2:13-cv-00272-WBS-CKD Document 23 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not unduly delayed the amendment, does not bring it in bad 

faith, the amendment is not futile, and such amendment does not prejudice defendants

Highway 88 and 99 Land Company, a Limited Partnership; and Ernest A. Federico dba Perko’s 

Cafe (“Defendants”), nor does the amendment in any way change the nature of the action;

WHEREAS, the amendment will not modify any date or deadline fixed by the Court’s 

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order dated August 15, 2013 (ECF No. 21) pursuant to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 16(b)(4);

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and 

Defendants, through their respective attorneys of record, that Plaintiff may file a First 

Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff file his First Amended Complaint 

within five (5) calendar days of the Court’s Order permitting such filing, and that Defendants’ 

responses thereto shall be due as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: November 13, 2013 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore 

Tanya E. Moore 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Robert Kalani

Dated: November 15, 2013 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP

/s/ Matthew S. Kenefick 

Matthew S. Kenefick

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant

Highway 88 and 99 Land Company, a Limited 

Partnership

Dated: November 13, 2013 MICHAEL WELCH + ASSOCIATES

/s/ Michael D. Welch 

Michael D. Welch

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Defendant

Ernest A. Federico dba Perko’s Cafe

Case 2:13-cv-00272-WBS-CKD Document 23 Filed 11/18/13 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff file his First Amended Complaint, a copy of 

which was filed with the Parties’ stipulation, within five (5) calendar days of the date this 

Order is filed. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ response thereto shall be filed within

the time required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 18, 2013

Case 2:13-cv-00272-WBS-CKD Document 23 Filed 11/18/13 Page 3 of 3