Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00620/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00620-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONATHAN MORGAN,

Plaintiff, CV F 05 00620 REC WMW P

vs. ORDER 

CALIF. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

Plaintiff is a former is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12132 et seq. Plaintiff filed this action on May 10, 2005. The

court has screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and finds that it appears

to state cognizable claims for relief against defendant California Department of Correction. 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, a

Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the

complaint filed May 10, 2005.

Case 1:05-cv-00620-LJO -WMW Document 5 Filed 02/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to

the court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and 

c. Two copies of the endorsed complaint filed May 10, 2005. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the

United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 

5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2006 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00620-LJO -WMW Document 5 Filed 02/16/06 Page 2 of 2