Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-04910/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-04910-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

NO. C 08-04910 RS 

ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

*E-Filed 02/16/2010* 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

UNIDAD DE FE Y AMOR 

CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

IGLESIA JESUCRISTO ES MI REFUGIO, 

INC; et al., 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 08-04910 RS 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 

SHORTEN TIME 

 On February 2, 2010, the Court entered an order directing that no later than February 22, 

2010, either (1) in compliance with the terms of their settlement agreement, the parties were to 

submit a stipulation for dismissal of this action, or (2) if no such stipulation were reached, then 

plaintiff was to file an appropriate motion to enforce the settlement agreement. The order further 

directed the parties to appear for an OSC hearing, on February 25, 2010 if neither a dismissal nor a 

motion to enforce the settlement agreement were filed by the deadline. 

 On February 12, 2010, plaintiff filed its motion to enforce the settlement agreement, thereby 

discharging its responsibilities under the February 2nd order, and relieving the parties of any 

Case 5:08-cv-04910-RS Document 54 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 2
NO. C 08-04910 RS 

ORDER 

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

obligation to appear for an OSC hearing on February 25th. Plaintiff, however, has also requested an 

order shortening time, such that its motion to enforce the settlement agreement can be heard on 

February 25th, at the time previously scheduled for the OSC. 

 The motion to shorten time is denied. The motion to enforce the settlement agreement seeks 

to compel defendants to comply with certain alleged obligations to provide various documents in 

connection with giving a security interest, and to provide a fully-executed copy of the settlement 

agreement, all of which plaintiff contends was supposed to have been done in October of 2009. 

Plaintiff has made no showing of exigent circumstances to support hearing the matter on shortened 

time, and specifically has not explained why a matter that has been pending for some four months 

has now suddenly become urgent.1 

 Plaintiff’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement will be set for hearing on March 25, 

2010, at at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 3, Seventeenth Floor, of the Court, located at 450 Golden Gate 

Avenue, San Francisco, CA. Opposition and reply papers, if any, shall be due at the times specified 

in Civil Local Rule 7. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 02/16/2010 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

1

 Nothing in this order is intended to condone any unexcused failure by defendants to comply with 

obligations they may have had under any enforceable settlement agreement. If plaintiff’s recitation 

of the facts and its understanding of the terms of the settlement agreement are correct, defendants 

should fulfill their obligations forthwith, such that further Court involvement will be unnecessary. 

Case 5:08-cv-04910-RS Document 54 Filed 02/16/10 Page 2 of 2