Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00218/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00218-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH MILLS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0218 DFL KJM P

vs.

COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed May 26, 2005, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed affidavit

in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis with a certified copy of his prison trust

account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint

within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that

this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded

to the court’s order and has not filed a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in

forma pauperis with a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month

period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

Case 2:05-cv-00218-DFL -KJM Document 13 Filed 08/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 5, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

mill0218.fifp 

Case 2:05-cv-00218-DFL -KJM Document 13 Filed 08/08/05 Page 2 of 2