Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_03-cv-05292/USCOURTS-arwd-5_03-cv-05292-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

JOHNNY LEE NICHOLS PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 03-5292

SHERIFF STEVE WHITMILL, CORPORAL 

MCCARTNEY, SGT. LINDABURY, DANIEL 

BAKER, SCOTT HAMMERSLA, and EARL

GOODHEART DEFENDANTS

O R D E R

Now pending before the court is plaintiff's motion (Doc. 37) for Relief from Judgment.

This motion has been referred (Doc. 38) to the undersigned by order of the district court. 

On April 14, 2005, the defendants in this action filed a motion (Doc. 30) for summary

judgment, as directed (Doc. 29) by order of the court. The court then prepared a summary

judgment response questionnaire for the plaintiff to complete and return, and plaintiff was

directed (Doc. 33) to return that response no later that June 3, 2005. On June 23, 2005, the

undersigned issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34), recommending that the entire

action be dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's order by returning the

completed response questionnaire. The district court adopted (Doc. 35) this report, and plaintiff's

case was dismissed on July 21, 2005. 

On August 3, 2005, the plaintiff then submitted his response (Doc. 36) to the defendants'

motion for summary judgment, and he later filed this motion (Doc. 37) now pending for Relief

from Judgment. In this motion, plaintiff states that he recently moved to the Hot Springs,

Arkansas area to avoid involvement in methamphetamine drugs in Northwest Arkansas. He

requests that the court make a final decision on his case. 

Case 5:03-cv-05292-JLH Document 39 Filed 08/29/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

-2-

Due to the court's preference for deciding cases on their merits, plaintiff's motion for

Relief from Judgment is GRANTED, and this case is reopened for consideration of defendants'

motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) (allowing relief from final judgment

due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect). 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of August 2005.

/s/ Beverly Stites Jones

_________________________________________

HON. BEVERLY STITES JONES 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:03-cv-05292-JLH Document 39 Filed 08/29/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>