Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00630/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00630-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN D. SCHEMA,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.

Defendants

No. 2:14-cv-0630-MCE-DAD-PS 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

PLAINTIFF TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.

On January 26, 2015, Judge Drozd entered Findings and Recommendations holding that 

Plaintiff’s sole remaining cause of action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. These 

were served by mail on pro se Plaintiff on or about January 27, 2015. The Court previously approved an 

extension for Plaintiff to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations from February 6, 2015, to 

February 27, 2015. (Dkt. No. 58). On February 25, 2015, Plaintiff contacted the undersigned to request 

an additional three weeks. The United States has no objection but is unlikely to agree to any further 

extension. Now wherefore, the parties hereby stipulate to such an extension.

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: February 26, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

/s/ Gregory T. Broderick

GREGORY T. BRODERICK

Assistant United States Attorney

/s/ John D. Schema (authorized 02/25/2015)

JOHN D. SCHEMA, in pro per

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

GREGORY T. BRODERICK

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 

Attorneys for the United States et al.

Case 2:14-cv-00630-MCE-DAD Document 60 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.1

Dated: March 1, 2015

dad1\orders.pro se\schema0630.stip.eot2.ord.doc

 

1

 The court will not grant any further extensions of time for this purpose absent a compelling 

showing of good cause. 

Case 2:14-cv-00630-MCE-DAD Document 60 Filed 03/02/15 Page 2 of 2