Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01178/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01178-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD WALKER,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-1178 MCE GGH P

vs.

D.K. SISTO, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 7, 2007, respondent filed a motion for a

more definite statement. Respondent requests that petitioner be ordered to file an amended

petition wherein he states each claim, describes what each claim is, and provides supporting

factual information. 

On September 26, 2007, petitioner filed a response to respondent’s motion. 

Petitioner states that he “agrees to join in the motion in the interest of clarity.” Response, p. 2. 

The court construes petitioner’s response as a statement of non-opposition to respondent’s

motion.

/////

/////

Case 2:07-cv-01178-RSL -JLW Document 8 Filed 12/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent’s September 7, 2007, motion for a more definite statement is

granted;

2. Petitioner is granted thirty days to file an amended petition; respondent’s

response is due thirty days thereafter; petitioner may file a reply thirty days thereafter.

DATED: 12/6/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

walk1178.mot

Case 2:07-cv-01178-RSL -JLW Document 8 Filed 12/07/07 Page 2 of 2