Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00611/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00611-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES SANFORD POBURSKY and )

WANDA POBURSKY, ) 

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. )

)

MADERA COUNTY, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1: 07 - CV - 0611 AWI DLB

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

ADDITIONAL TIME IN WHICH TO

FILE AN OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS

(Document #62)

On September 19, 2007, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. 

This motion was set for hearing on October 22, 2007. When Plaintiffs did not file a timely

opposition pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(c), on October 18, 2007, the court vacated the October

22, 2007 hearing and took Defendants’ motion under submission. 

On October 19, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a motion for continuance and motion for relief from

default on Defendants’ motion to dismiss. The court construes these motions as a motion for

additional time in which to file an opposition to Defendants’ motion. In this document,

Plaintiffs state they only recently received a copy of Defendants’ motion to dismiss and there was

confusion over the date for the hearing on Defendants’ motion and a status conference hearing. 

Good cause having been presented to the court, the court will give Plaintiffs additional

time in which to file an opposition. At this time, the pending motion to dismiss will remain

under submission. If, after receiving all briefs, the court believes a hearing is necessary, the

court will set a hearing date. Accordingly, the court ORDERS that:

1. Plaintiffs’ motions, which have been construed as a motion for additional time in

which to file an opposition, are GRANTED;

Case 1:07-cv-00611-AWI-DLB Document 64 Filed 10/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

2. Plaintiffs SHALL FILE with the court and serve on Defendants’ attorneys an

opposition to Defendants’ motion by 4:00 p.m. on November 5, 2007;

3. Defendants may file any reply brief by 4:00 p.m. on November 19, 2007; and

4. The pending motion will remain under submission and the court will issue an

opinion after November 19, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 30, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

9h0d30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00611-AWI-DLB Document 64 Filed 10/30/07 Page 2 of 2