Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02559/USCOURTS-ca4-15-02559-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2559

DEBORAH S. COX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00679-MOC-DCK)

Submitted: June 20, 2016 Decided: July 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Geraldine Sumter, FERGUSON, CHAMBER & SUMTER, P.A., Charlotte, 

North Carolina, for Appellant. James M. Powell, WOMBLE CARLYLE 

SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Blair L. 

Byrum, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP, Winston-Salem, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2559 Doc: 31 Filed: 07/26/2016 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Deborah S. Cox appeals the district court’s order granting 

Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC’s summary judgment motion on her age 

discrimination claims, brought pursuant to the Age 

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 

U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2015); and North 

Carolina’s Equal Employment Practices Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. 

§§ 143.422.1 to 143.422.3 (2015). We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. Cox v. Lowe’s Home Ctrs., LLC, No. 

3:14-cv-00679-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2015). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-2559 Doc: 31 Filed: 07/26/2016 Pg: 2 of 2