Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00549/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00549-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

McNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

P.O. BOX 5288, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 

TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26

ORDER REGARDING UPDATING COURT FOLLOWING RULING 

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT IN RELATED WASHINGTON CASE

– 06-00549 MCE DAD 

 

JAMES V. FITZGERALD, III (State Bar No. 55632) 

NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167) 

MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,

PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP 

1211 Newell Avenue 

Post Office Box 5288 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: (925) 939-5330 

Facsimile: (925) 939-0203 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF VALLEJO, ROBERT NICHELINI, JEROME 

PATZER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LORI BAUER, individually, and as 

Personal Representative of the Estate of 

Andrew Washington, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal 

corporation; ROBERT NICHELINI, in his 

capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY 

OF VALLEJO; JEROME PATZER, 

individually and in his capacity as a police 

officer for the CITY OF VALLEJO; and 

DOES 1-25, inclusive, individually and in 

their capacities as police officers for the 

CITY OF VALLEJO,, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No. 2:06-cv-00549-MCE-DAD 

ORDER REGARDING UPDATING 

COURT FOLLOWING RULING ON 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IN 

RELATED WASHINGTON CASE 

Pre-Trial Conference: vacated 

Trial Date: vacated 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES STIPULATION IN THEIR JOINT LETTER TO THE 

COURT DATED JANUARY 18, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE PARTIES 

SHALL UPDATE THE COURT IN WRITING WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS 

FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF ANY RULING ON THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

Case 2:06-cv-00549-JAM-DAD Document 30 Filed 01/25/08 Page 1 of 2
McNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

P.O. BOX 5288, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 

TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26

ORDER REGARDING UPDATING COURT FOLLOWING RULING 

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT IN RELATED WASHINGTON CASE

– 06-00549 MCE DAD

2 

PER FRCP 12(B)(6) IN THE CASE OF WASHINGTON V. TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-00881 - RRB-GGH. FOLLOWING SUCH NOTIFICATION, 

DEPENDING UPON THE OUTCOME OF THE MOTION, THE COURT WILL NOTIFY THE 

PARTIES OF THE NEXT HEARING AND/OR CONFERENCE SCHEDULED IN THIS 

MATTER. 

Dated: January 24, 2008 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00549-JAM-DAD Document 30 Filed 01/25/08 Page 2 of 2