Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-02965-136/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ATOPTECH, INC,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-02965-MMC 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED 

MOTION FOR FINAL ENTRY OF 

JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 875

Before the Court is plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s (“Synopsys”) “Renewed Motion for 

Entry of Final Judgment,” filed October 28, 2016, by which Synopsys seeks, pursuant to 

Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, entry of final judgment on its copyright 

and contract claims in the above-titled action. Defendant ATopTech, Inc. (“ATopTech”) 

has filed opposition, to which Synopsys has replied. The matter came on regularly for 

hearing on December 9, 2016. Patrick T. Michael, Krista S. Schwartz, and Nathaniel P. 

Garrett of Jones Day appeared on behalf of Synopsys and Paul Alexander and Philip W. 

Marsh of Arnold & Porter LLP appeared on behalf of ATopTech.

For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, the motion is hereby DENIED, 

without prejudice to re-filing after the patent claims in the instant action have been 

resolved.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 9, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-02965-MMC Document 914 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 1