Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02083/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02083-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:1471 Declaratory &amp; Injunctive Relief - Foreclosure Sale

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MAE BATTAGLIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DONALD R. LEVITT,

Defendant.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C- 07-2083 PVT

ORDER THAT CASE BE

REASSIGNED TO DISTRICT

COURT JUDGE AND REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION THAT CASE

BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT

BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

On April 13, 2007, Defendant Donald R. Levitt, appearing pro se, removed this action

from state court. On April 27, 2007, Defendant Levitt filed a unilateral request to dismiss this

action. The Court informed Plaintiff’s counsel that a Defendant may not unilaterally dismiss an

action and that some action was necessary by Plaintiff. Plaintiff has taken no action to either

prosecute or dismiss this case. A Case Management Conference was scheduled on July 31,

2007, at which Plaintiff and Defendant both failed to appear. On August 13, 2007, this Court

issued an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and

failure to appear at the Case Management Conference. The Order to Show Cause required a

response no later than August 31, 2007. Plaintiff filed no response. Neither party has consented

to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636 (c). 

Case 5:07-cv-02083-JF Document 6 Filed 10/29/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this case shall be reassigned to a District Court

Judge.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute

based on Plaintiff’s failure to file any documents with this court, Plaintiff’s failure to appear at

the July 31, 2007 Case Management Conference and Plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Order to

Show Cause.

 Any party may serve and file specific written objections to this recommendation within

ten (10) working days after being served with a copy . See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C);

Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 (b); Civil L.R. 72-3. 

Dated: October 26, 2007

____________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:07-cv-02083-JF Document 6 Filed 10/29/07 Page 2 of 2