Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04981/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04981-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARGIE CHERRY and ESTORIA CHERRY, on

behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

THE CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO

(“City College”) LAWRENCE WONG, in his

official capacity as President of the Board of

Trustees, MILTON MARKS, III, in his official

capacity as Vice-President of the Board of Trustees,

DR. NATALIE BERG, JOHNNIE CARTER, JR.,

DR. ANITA GRIER, JULIO J. RAMOS, RODEL E.

RODIS, in their official capacities as members of the

Board of Trustees, and DR. PHILIP R. RAY, JR., in

his official capacity as Chancellor,

Defendants. /

No. C 04-04981 WHA

ORDER REQUESTING

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

As stated on the record, defendants shall produce redacted DSPS files for all students

with alleged mobility disabilities by JUNE 6, 2005 AT NOON. The Court is particularly

interested in (1) how many students with mobility disabilities who have raised access concerns

due to architectural or physical barriers and (2) how DSPS has responded, specifically what

types of accommodations were provided. In addition, the parties are requested to jointly

identify which facilities or parts of facilities have been the subject of new construction or

alterations since January 26, 1992, as defined in 28 C.F.R. 35.151. Finally, defendants shall

include in their materials the documentation reviewed by the Office of Civil Rights, (as

referenced in the letter of October 16, 1998), was used to establish that defendants were in

Case 3:04-cv-04981-WHA Document 158 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

compliance with the relevant requirements of Section 504 and Title II of the ADA (Darmagnac

Exh. F).

Both sides shall submit their supplemental briefs by JUNE 9, 2005 AT NOON. The Court

defers ruling on both motions until the requested supplemental material has been evaluated. 

The parties will be informed if any further hearings are necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 2, 2005 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-04981-WHA Document 158 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2