Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03583/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03583-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STACEY GREENFIELD,

Plaintiff,

v.

CRITERION CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, 

LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-3583-PJH 

ORDER

On November 19, 2015, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, 

noticed for hearing on January 20, 2016. The court previously approved a stipulated 

briefing schedule that set the date for the filing of the opposition and reply on December 

23, 2015, and January 14, 2015, respectively. While the approved stipulation also 

provided for a hearing date “no earlier than January 20, 2016,” six days is an insufficient 

amount of time for the court to review the parties’ papers and prepare for the hearing. 

The Civil Local Rules of this court provide for a minimum of 14 days between the filing of 

the reply brief and the hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-2. Accordingly, defendants shall renotice 

the hearing for a date no earlier than February 3, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 20, 2015

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cv-03583-PJH Document 36 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 1