Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02797/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02797-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE KING,

Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-2797 JAM DAD P

vs.

MIKE McDONALD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 11, 2013, the assigned District Judge issued an order adopting in full

findings and recommendations issued by the undersigned on May 1, 2013, granting defendants’

motion for summary judgment and denying plaintiff’s motions to amend, for summary judgment,

and for injunctive relief. (ECF No. 93.) Judgment was entered on the same day. (ECF No. 94.) 

On July 30, 2013, plaintiff filed a document styled “Opposition to Order of Judgment.” (ECF

No. 96.) On August 5, 2013, defendants filed an opposition to plaintiff’s filing. (ECF No. 101.) 

On the same day, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 102.)

After review of the document filed with the court by plaintiff on July 30, 2013

(ECF No. 96), the court finds the contents thereof too vague and conclusory to require or support

further consideration of that filing by the court. Accordingly, the document will be disregarded.

1

Case 2:10-cv-02797-JAM-DAD Document 105 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the document filed

by plaintiff on July 30, 2013 (ECF No. 96) is disregarded.

DATED: September 3, 2013.

DAD:12

king2797.o2

2

Case 2:10-cv-02797-JAM-DAD Document 105 Filed 09/04/13 Page 2 of 2