Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00815/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00815-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOUANG SAECHO, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LANDRYS INC., a Delaware Corporation,

and McCORMICK & SCHMICK

RESTAURANT CORP., 

Defendants. /

No. C 15-00815 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO

HAC VICE APPLICATION

OF ATTORNEY

NICHOLAS A. MURRAY

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Nicholas A. Murray (Dkt. No. 49) is DENIED

for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that

“he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the

highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis

added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only

identifies the state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Colorado” — is inadequate under

the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not

need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 28, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-00815-WHA Document 50 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 1