Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-02149/USCOURTS-caed-2_99-cv-02149-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREG K. TOLBERT,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-99-2149 LKK GGH P

vs.

CHERYL K. PLILER, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this application

for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 10, 2003, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:99-cv-02149-LKK -GGH Document 34 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 10, 2003, are adopted in full;

and

2. Respondent’s January 13, 2000, motion for summary dismissal is granted as to

the following claims on grounds that they are not exhausted: 1) ineffective assistance of counsel

based on counsel’s failure to protect petitioner’s speedy trial rights; and 2) improper admission of

evidence that petitioner gave a false name; respondent’s motion is denied in all other respects;

respondent is ordered to file an answer to the petition within thirty days.

DATED: May 31, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/tolb2149.805

Case 2:99-cv-02149-LKK -GGH Document 34 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 2