Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00477/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00477-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CHRIS BAKER, State Bar No. 181557 

cbaker@bakerlp.com

BAKER & SCHWARTZ, P.C. 

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3520 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-1064 

Fax: (415) 520-0446 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DAVID BARNES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID BARNES 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation; THOMAS ROONEY, an individual; 

and JOEL GAY, an individual 

Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-00477-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE 

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-1 and Judge Chen’s Standing Orders, the parties hereby submit 

this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to modify the briefing schedule regarding Defendant 

Energy Recovery, Inc.’s Motion For Order Directing Plaintiff’s Counsel To Return Defendant 

Energy Recovery, Inc.’s Documents. 

WHEREAS, on January 27, 2016, Plaintiff David Barnes (“Plaintiff”) filed his Complaint 

in this case with the Northern District of California; 

WHEREAS, on February 9, 2016, this case was reassigned to Judge Edward Chen after a 

finding that it was related to a securities litigation matter involving Energy Recovery, Inc., which 

Case 3:16-cv-00477-EMC Document 27 Filed 02/25/16 Page 1 of 4
- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

is currently pending before Judge Chen (In re Energy Recovery, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case 

No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC); 

WHEREAS, on February 16, 2016 defendant Energy Recovery, Inc. (“Defendant ERI”) 

filed a motion styled “Motion for Order Directing Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s Counsel to Return 

Defendant Energy Recovery, Inc.’s Documents.” 

WHEREAS, March 1, 2016 is the current deadline for Plaintiff to file his Opposition to 

Defendant ERI’s Motion to Return Documents; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Counsel has (and has had) other business and personal matters 

scheduled through March 1, 2016, including a hearing in Sacramento Superior Court on February 

29, 2016. 

WHEREAS, March 8, 2016, is the current deadline for Defendant ERI to file any Reply 

Brief in support of its Motion to Return Documents. 

WHEREAS, March 24, 2016 at 1:30PM is the current hearing on Defendant ERI’s 

Motion to Return Documents 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 

1. Plaintiff’s deadline for filing an opposition to Defendant’s motion is extended one 

day, to March 2, 2016. 

2. Defendant’s deadline for filing a reply in support of its motion is likewise 

extended one day, to March 9, 2016. 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

Case 3:16-cv-00477-EMC Document 27 Filed 02/25/16 Page 2 of 4
- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3. The hearing date of March 24, 2016 will remain the same. 

Dated: February 24, 2016 BAKER & SCHWARTZ P.C. 

By:------------------S------------------------ 

Chris Baker 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

DAVID BARNES 

 Dated: February 24, 2016 LEWIS RICE LLC and FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 

By:----------------S------------------------ 

David W. Gearhart 

Attorney for Defendant 

ENERGY RECOVERY, INC. 

Case 3:16-cv-00477-EMC Document 27 Filed 02/25/16 Page 3 of 4
- 4 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

The Court, having read and considered the Parties’ Stipulation to Modify Briefing 

Schedule, and finding good cause in support thereof, hereby orders that the filing 

deadline and the hearing date is continued as follows: 

1. Plaintiff’s deadline to file an opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Return 

Documents is continued to March 2, 2016; 

2. Defendant’s deadline to file any reply in support of its Motion to Return 

Documents is continued to March 9, 2016. 

3. This Order does not change the current hearing date. 

DATED:___________________ _________________________________ 

 HON. EDWARD CHEN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

February 25, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-00477-EMC Document 27 Filed 02/25/16 Page 4 of 4