Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00865/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00865-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIM

CASE NO. 2:13-CV-000865-MCE

Lee D. Stimmel (Bar No. 58405)

lstimmel@stimmel-law.com

STIMMEL, STIMMEL & SMITH

155 Montgomery Street, 12th Floor

San Francisco, California 94104-3973

Telephone: 415.39202018

Facsimile: 415.391.2124

Seth J. Schwartz (Bar No. 103357)

sschwartz@archernorris.com

ARCHER NORRIS PLC

2033 North Main Street, Suite 800

Walnut Creek, CA 94596-3759

Telephone: 925.930.6600

Facsimile: 925.930.6620

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants

KRISTI VERMA, VISHAL VERMA and ZENTEK 

CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTI VERMA, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

EFRAT OKEV, et al.

 Defendants.

Case No. 2:13-CV-00865-MCE-EFB

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 

COUNTERCLAIM OF LLOYD BURTON 

AND EFRAT OKOV

EFRAT OKEV, an individual, and LLOYD 

BURTON, an individual, 

 Counterclaimants,

v.

KRISTI VERMA, an individual, and 

VISHAL VERMA, an individual, and 

ZENTEK CORPORATION, a California 

Corporation,

 Counterdefendants.

Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants Kristi Verma, Vishal Verma, and Zentek Corporation 

Case 2:13-cv-00865-MCE-DB Document 42 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIM

CASE NO. 2:13-CV-000865-MCE

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) requested a 15-day extension of time to respond to the counterclaim 

filed by Defendants and Counterclaimants Efrat Okev and Lloyd Burton (collectively, 

“Defendants”) on February 16, 2014. Defendants are amenable to such an extension. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 144, the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of 

record, hereby collectively agree and stipulate to the following:

1. The time for Plaintiffs to file a responsive pleading shall be extended to March 28, 

2014.

This is the first stipulation extending time to respond to the counterclaim. 

Dated: March 6, 2014 ARCHER NORRIS PLC

/s/ Seth J. Schwartz

Seth J. Schwartz

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants

Kristi Verma, Vishal Verma, and Zentek

Corporation

Dated: March 6, 2014 PFEIFFER FITZGIBBON & ZIONTZ LLP

/s/ Thomas N. FitzGibbon (as authorized on 

March 6, 2014)

Thomas N. FitzGibbon

Attorneys for Defendants and 

Counterclaimants 

Efrat Okev and Lloyd Burton

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 17, 2014

Case 2:13-cv-00865-MCE-DB Document 42 Filed 03/17/14 Page 2 of 2