Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05659/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05659-78/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER

LEGAL02/36821852v1 - 1 - Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Yitai Hu (SBN 248085)

yitai.hu@alston.com

Ryan W. Koppelman (SBN 290704)

ryan.koppelman@alston.com

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1950 University Avenue, 5th Floor

East Palo Alto, CA 94303

Tel.: 650-838-2026

Fax: 650-838-2001

Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963)

elizabeth.rader@alston.com

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

The Atlantic Building

950 F Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004-1404

Tel.: 202-239-3300

Fax: 202-239-3333

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION

Steven M. Levitan (SBN 148716)

steve.levitan@hoganlovells.com

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100

Menlo Park, California 94025

Tel: (650) 463-4000

Fax: (650) 463-4199

Christian E. Mammen (SBN 188454)

chris.mammen@hoganlovells.com

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

3 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94111

Tel: (415) 374-2300

Fax: (415) 374-2499

Edward C. Kwok (SBN 144302)

(ekwok@vlplawgroup.com)

VLP Law Group LLP

19900 Price Avenue

Cupertino, CA 95014

Tel: (408) 620-5501

Attorneys for Defendant

uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

uPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,

AMANDA DAI and JACKY LEE,

Defendants.

Case No. C 09-05659 WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING

WITH PREJUDICE

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 585 Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER

LEGAL02/36821852v1 - 2 - Case No. 3:09-cv-05659-WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On November 25, 2016, Plaintiff Richtek Technology Corporation (“Richtek”) and Defendant

uPI Semiconductor Corporation (“uPI”) submitted a stipulation and joint motion to dismiss with

prejudice. Having considered this request, the Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims between Richtek and uPI shall be dismissed with

prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses relating to the claims between

Richtek and uPI (including attorney and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party

incurring same.

Dated:

United States District Judge

November 29, 2016.

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 585 Filed 11/29/16 Page 2 of 2