Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01091/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01091-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN AHMADZAI,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1091 LKK JFM PS

vs.

FRANK METULLY, SR., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

On July 14, 2005, defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 and motion

for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. No opposition to the motion to dismiss

has been filed. 

Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party

will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to

the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may

Case 2:05-cv-01091-LKK -JFM Document 20 Filed 09/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.”

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of September 8, 2005 is vacated. Hearing on defendants’

motion is continued to October 6, 2005 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 27.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss and for summary

judgment, no later than September 21, 2005. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing

will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: September 6, 2005. 

/001; ahmadzai.46

Case 2:05-cv-01091-LKK -JFM Document 20 Filed 09/06/05 Page 2 of 2