Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05760/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-05760-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS; Case No. 12-cv-5760-MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TED C. LINDQUIST, III (SBN 178523) 

LINDQUISTLAW

100 Pine Street, Suite 2150 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: 415-399-1159 

Facsimile: 866-255-4580 

Email: tlindquist@lindquistlaw.com 

MICHAEL RUBIN (SBN 80618) 

EILEEN B. GOLDSMITH (SBN 218029) 

ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 

177 Post Street, Suite 300 

San Francisco, California 94108 

Telephone: 415-421-7151 

Facsimile: 415-362-8064 

Email: mrubin@altber.com 

Email: egoldsmith@altber.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ALANA KASELITZ and MELISSA KASELITZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ALANA KASELITZ, an individual; and 

MELISSA KASELITZ, an individual,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

HISOFT TECHNOLOGY

INTERNATIONAL , LTD., et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 12-cv-5760-MMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS IN 

SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTIONS TO 

VACATE IN PART AND TO CONFIRM 

ARBITRATION AWARD

Arbitration Hearing: July 20, 2015

Final Award issued: October 23, 2015 

Application to Correct Submitted to Arbitrator: 

November 2, 2015

Final Disposition on Application to Correct 

Issued: November 30, 2015

Case 3:12-cv-05760-MMC Document 60 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 3
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS; Case No. 12-cv-5760-MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WHEREAS pursuant to a briefing schedule agreed to by the parties, Plaintiffs filed a 

Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award in Part on January 8, 2016, and Defendant hiSoft Technology 

International, Ltd., simultaneously filed a Motion to Confirm the Arbitration Award, and the 

parties have noticed their respective cross-motions for hearing on February 26, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.; 

 WHEREAS the parties have agreed to file their respective oppositions to the cross-motions 

on January 22, 2016, in accordance with Local Rule 7-3; 

 WHEREAS under Local Rule 7-3, the parties’ reply briefs in support of their respective 

motions would be due on January 29, 2016; 

WHEREAS due to the unavailability of Plaintiffs’ attorneys Michael Rubin and Eileen 

Goldsmith on January 29, 2016, and because those attorneys have primary responsibility for 

drafting Plaintiffs’ reply brief, the parties have agreed that their respective reply briefs shall be due 

on February 3, 2016; 

 WHEREAS the agreed-upon due date for reply briefs is 23 days before the parties have 

noticed their cross-motions for hearing, 

 The parties hereby stipulate as follows: 

 1. The deadline for the parties to file their respective reply briefs shall be February 3, 2016. 

Dated: January 14, 2016 ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 

By: /s/ Eileen B. Goldsmith 

 Eileen B. Goldsmith 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Melissa and Alana Kaselitz 

Dated: January 14, 2016 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 

By: /s/ Joyce Chang _______ 

 Joyce Chang 

Attorneys for Defendant hiSoft Technology 

International, Ltd. 

Case 3:12-cv-05760-MMC Document 60 Filed 01/15/16 Page 2 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS; Case No. 12-cv-5760-MMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ECF CERTIFICATION 

 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that she has obtained 

concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to the document. 

Dated: January 14, 2016 

/s/ Eileen Goldsmith_________

 Eileen Goldsmith 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Melissa and Alana Kaselitz 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________, 2016 ______________________________ 

 HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

 United States District Judge 

January 15

Case 3:12-cv-05760-MMC Document 60 Filed 01/15/16 Page 3 of 3