Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01724/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01724-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Plaintiff calls his document objections to findings and recommendations. 1

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TUTUILA TUVALU,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1724 JAM KJM P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On October 9, 2007, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate 1

judge’s order filed September 28, 2007, denying plaintiff’s motion for discovery and motion to

compel discovery, request for the issuance of a subpoena, motion for additional time in which to

oppose defendants’ motion for summary judgment and motion to amend his complaint. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 /////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 174 Filed 07/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed September 28, 2007, is affirmed. 

DATED: July 15, 2008

/s/ John A. Mendez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/tuva1724.850

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 174 Filed 07/15/08 Page 2 of 2