Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04018/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04018-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIPULATION RESCHEDULING TUTORIAL AND CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION HEARING 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

John P. Bovich (SBN 150688) 

William R. Overend (SBN 180209) 

REED SMITH LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3922 

Telephone: 415.543.8700 

Facsimile: 415.391.8269 

William H. Manning (pro hac vice) 

Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) 

Eric S. Jackson (pro hac vice) 

Jacob S. Zimmerman (pro hac vice) 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 

2800 LaSalle Plaza, 800 LaSalle Avenue 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 

Telephone: 612.349.8500 

Facsimile: 612.339.4181 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company 

John J. Feldhaus (pro hac vice) 

Stephen M. Lobbin (SBN 181195) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

1530 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125 

Telephone: 650.856.3700 

Facsimile: 650.856.3710 

Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information 

Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Business 

Solutions, Inc. and Toshiba TEC America Retail Information Systems, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INTERGRAPH HARDWARE 

TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, a Nevada corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, a Japanese 

corporation, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

UNDER CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(B) AND 6-2

RESCHEDULING DATES FOR TUTORIAL

AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 95 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION RESCHEDULING TUTORIAL AND CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION HEARING 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule (N.D. Cal.) 6-1(a), by and between the parties—Plaintiff Intergraph 

Hardware Technologies Company (“Intergraph”) and Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba 

America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Business 

Solutions, Inc. and Toshiba TEC America Retail Information Systems, Inc. (collectively “Toshiba”)—IT 

IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 

1. The tutorial and claim construction hearings for this case were originally scheduled for 

June 8 and June 15, 2007, respectively. On June 4, 2007, the Court issued a Clerk’s Notice 

Rescheduling the dates for the tutorial and claim construction hearing to June 21 and June 22, 2007 

respectively. 

2. Due to scheduling conflicts, the parties respectfully request that the tutorial and claim 

construction hearing be rescheduled to June 20 and June 21, 2007, respectively. The parties agree to 

these new dates and have confirmed them with Mr. Bowser. Both the tutorial and claim construction 

hearings will begin at 9:30 a.m. 

3. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(1)-(3), this stipulated request is accompanied by the 

attached declaration setting forth (1) the reasons for the requested rescheduling; (2) all previous time 

modifications in the case; and (3) the effect of the requested rescheduling. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: June 4, 2007 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP

/s/ Brad P. Engdahl 

William H. Manning (pro hac vice) 

Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 

2800 LaSalle Plaza, 800 LaSalle Avenue 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 

Telephone: 612.349.8500 

Facsimile: 612.339.4181 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Intergraph Hardware 

Technologies Company 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 95 Filed 06/06/07 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

STIPULATION RESCHEDULING TUTORIAL AND CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION HEARING 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

Dated: June 4, 2007 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

/s/ Stephen M. Lobbin 

John J. Feldhaus (pro hac vice) 

Stephen M. Lobbin (State Bar No. 181195) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

1530 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125 

Telephone: 650.856.3700 

Facsimile: 650.856.3710 

Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba 

America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America 

Medical Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Business 

Solutions, Inc. and Toshiba TEC America Retail 

Information Systems, Inc. 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________, 2007 ______________________________________________

Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

United States District Judge

June 5

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 95 Filed 06/06/07 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 

STIPULATION RESCHEDULING TUTORIAL AND CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION HEARING 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

CERTIFICATION 

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained by the above 

named signatories. 

DATED: June 4, 2007. 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 

By: /s/ Brad P. Engdahl 

Brad P. Engdahl 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 95 Filed 06/06/07 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5 

STIPULATION RESCHEDULING TUTORIAL AND CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION HEARING 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

I, John P. Bovich, declare and state as follows: 

1. I am an attorney with Reed Smith LLP, local counsel for Intergraph in the abovecaptioned action. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth below, and if called upon I could 

and would testify competently thereto. 

2. The reasons for the requested rescheduling are stated in Paragraph 2 of the Stipulation 

herein. Due to scheduling conflicts, the parties respectfully request that the dates for the tutorial and 

claim construction hearing be moved forward one day. 

3. No previous time modifications have been sought or entered in this case which have 

altered any date set by this Court’s December 4, 2006 Order following the Case Management 

Conference, or any other deadline already fixed by the Court, with the exception of the April 25, 2007 

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Deadlines Re Patent Briefings One Day. Other time 

modifications have been entered, for example, extending the time for Plaintiff to respond reply to the 

Defendants’ counterclaims, and extending the time for certain exchanges between the parties under this 

Court’s Patent Local Rules, as well as extending the mediation deadline. 

4. The effect of the requested extension would only affect the hearing dates for the tutorial 

and claim construction hearing. The briefing schedule pursuant to the original hearing date remains in 

effect. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

Executed on this 4th day of June, 2007 at San Francisco, California. 

/s/ John P. Bovich 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 95 Filed 06/06/07 Page 5 of 5