Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00114/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00114-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENITO AGUILAR,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

KIM HOLLAND, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:16-cv-00114-LJO-GSA-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE 

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR 

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON 

WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED

(ECF No. 1.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 30 

DAYS

I. BACKGROUND

Benito Aguilar (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 

in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2016, Plaintiff 

filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) 

On November 14, 2016, the Court dismissed Plaintiff=s Complaint for failure to comply 

with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to file an Amended Complaint within 

thirty days. (ECF No. 12.) The thirty-day deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not complied 

with or otherwise responded to the Court=s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which 

sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A 

and 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e), this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff=s failure 

Case 1:16-cv-00114-LJO-GSA Document 13 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section 1983, and that this dismissal be 

subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658 

F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(l). Within thirty 

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate 

Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 

within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 

772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 

1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 29, 2016 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00114-LJO-GSA Document 13 Filed 12/29/16 Page 2 of 2