Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03824/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03824-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

---

Stip. to Modify Scheduling Order, Case No. C 04-03824 JW (RS) 

 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

John C. Gorman, #91515 

Charles J. Stiegler, #245973 

GORMAN & MILLER, P.C. 

210 North Fourth Street, Suite 200 

San Jose, CA. 95112 

(408) 297-2222 (phone) 

(408) 297-2224 (fax) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AUREFLAM CORPORATION 

L. Jay Pedersen, # 127791 

BLEDSOE, CATHCART, DIESTEL & PEDERSEN, LLP 

601 California Street, 16th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Telephone: (415) 981-5411 

Facsimile: (415) 981-0352 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Pho Hoa Hiep, Inc., Pho Hoa 

Hiep I, Inc., Pho Hoa Hiep II, 

Inc., Pho Hoa Hiep V, Inc., Liu 

Tran; Danh Tran; Son Huynh; 

Phong Huynh; Liem Le; and Linh 

Nguyen 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AUREFLAM CORPORATION, a 

California corporation; 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

PHO HOA HIEP, INC., a 

California Corporation; et 

al.; 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 04-03824 JW (RS) 

STIPULATION TO MODIFY 

SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER THEREON 

HON. JAMES WARE 

 

Case 5:04-cv-03824-JW Document 99 Filed 02/21/07 Page 1 of 4
Stip. to Modify Scheduling Order, Case No. C 04-03824 JW (RS) 

 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

 WHEREAS, this action was commenced by plaintiff and 

counterdefendant Aureflam Corporation on September 10, 2004; 

 WHEREAS, this action was subsequently deemed related to 

Aureflam Corporation V. Pho Hoa Phat I, Inc., et al., Case No. C05 

00746 and various set dates that had been previously set by the 

court were vacated; 

 WHEREAS, on September 6, 2006, this court entered a scheduling 

order setting various pre-trial scheduling and discovery/motion 

cutoff dates, including setting a Preliminary Pretrial and Trial 

Setting Conference on June 18, 2007, and directed that the parties 

to contact the ADR Program by September 21, 2006. 

 WHEREAS, the parties did contact the ADR Program at the 

designated phone number prior to the September 21, 2006 date but, 

for some unknown reason, the case did not get assigned to ADR and 

thus the parties have not yet participated in ADR; 

 WHEREAS, the parties have recently contacted the ADR Program 

administrator to inquire about the lack of an ADR appointment and 

attorney Robert Freitas has now been appointed to act as mediator; 

 WHEREAS, an ADR mediation session has been scheduled with Mr. 

Freitas for March 30, 2007; 

 WHEREAS, the parties to the related Aureflam v. Pho Hoa Phat

case have recently reached a tentative settlement following a 

mediation session conducted before attorney/mediator Freitas and are 

in the process of circulating a proposed settlement agreement for 

signature; 

 WHEREAS, the parties to this action have conducted a 

substantial amount of fact discovery thus far but still need to 

complete additional fact discovery, plus expert discovery; 

Case 5:04-cv-03824-JW Document 99 Filed 02/21/07 Page 2 of 4
Stip. to Modify Scheduling Order, Case No. C 04-03824 JW (RS) 

 3 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

 WHEREAS, the parties would prefer to conduct the ADR session 

and have an opportunity to explore settlement with the courtappointed mediator before incurring the cost of conducting the 

additional remaining discovery; 

 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their respective 

counsel of record, hereby stipulate to modify the existing 

scheduling order to move each of the dates that have not yet elapsed 

back by approximately two months as follows: 

Date Event

05/31/07 Close of fact witness and expert discovery 

06/11/07 Last day to hear any motion to exclude an expert or 

any portion of an expert's testimony in accordance 

with Civil Local Rule 7-2. 

07/30/07 Last day for hearing of dispositive motions. 

08/10/07 Last day to lodge with Chambers a Preliminary 

Pretrial and Trial Setting Conference Statement and 

Proposed Order 

08/20/07 Preliminary Pretrial and Trial Setting Conference at 

11:00 a.m. 

 

 GORMAN & MILLER, P.C. 

Date Feb. 20, 2007 By _/s/_______________________ 

JOHN C. GORMAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counter-Defendant Aureflam 

Corporation 

Case 5:04-cv-03824-JW Document 99 Filed 02/21/07 Page 3 of 4
Stip. to Modify Scheduling Order, Case No. C 04-03824 JW (RS) 

 4 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

BLEDSOE, CATHCART, DIESTEL & 

PEDERSEN, LLP 

Date _Feb. 20, 2007 By __/s/_______________________ 

L. Jay Pedersen 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Pho Hoa Hiep, Inc., Pho Hoa 

Hiep I, Inc., Pho Hoa Hiep II, 

Inc., Pho Hoa Hiep V, Inc., Liu 

Tran; Danh Tran; Son Huynh; 

Phong Huynh; Liem Le; and Linh 

Nguyen 

 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The proposed dates 

are hereby adopted by the court and the Preliminary Pretrial and 

Trial Setting Conference is hereby continued to August 20, 2007 at 

11:00 a.m. 

Date: _____________________________ 

 By ___________________________ 

 HON. JAMES WARE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

2/21/2007

Case 5:04-cv-03824-JW Document 99 Filed 02/21/07 Page 4 of 4