Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00543/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00543-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SIRRIUM, No. 2:12-CV-0543-LKK-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

BANK OF AMERICA NA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the

court is plaintiff’s second motion for leave to further amend the complaint (Doc. 24). As with

the prior motion for leave to amend, the current motion will be denied for the same two reasons. 

First, plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint. Plaintiff’s failure to do so makes it

impossible for the court to evaluate whether leave to amend should be granted. Second,

plaintiff’s motion was not properly noticed for hearing before the undersigned pursuant to

Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

1

Case 2:12-cv-00543-LKK-CMK Document 25 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to

amend (Doc. 24) is denied without prejudice. 

DATED: January 2, 2013

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:12-cv-00543-LKK-CMK Document 25 Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 2