Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_02-cv-00424/USCOURTS-azd-2_02-cv-00424-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 195
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

)

)

ESA Management, Inc., et al., ) CV 02-0424-PHX-PGR

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

vs. ) ORDER

)

Tufo Associates, Inc., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________)

This matter having come before the Court on Cella Barr Associates, Inc.'s (“Cella

Barr”) Motion for Summary Judgment, and the parties having had an opportunity to plead

and argue the matter, the Court finds that, for the reasons set forth in this Court’s Order

dated March 25, 2005, that Cella Barr is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 

Furthermore, after pleading Cella Barr's Application for Attorneys Fees (Doc. 453),

following this Court’s grant of Cella Barr's Motion for Summary Judgment on March 25,

2005, this Court finds that Cella Barr is entitled to an award of its attorneys’ fees in the

amount of $12,851.23, for the reasons set forth in this Court’s Order filed February 23,

2006.

Case 2:02-cv-00424-PGR Document 513 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

Cella Barr having prevailed on its Motion for Summary Judgment, and good cause

appearing therefore, the Court concludes that there is no just reason to delay entry of

judgment in favor of Cella Barr. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of Cella Barr Associates, Inc. and

against Third-Party Plaintiff Tufo Associates, Inc. 

DATED this 28th day of March, 2006.

Case 2:02-cv-00424-PGR Document 513 Filed 03/29/06 Page 2 of 2