Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01515/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01515-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARLENE ALSUP, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

U.S. BANCORP and DOES 1 to 5, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. 2:14-cv-01515-KJM-DAD 

ORDER 

On October 10, 2014, the court held a hearing on the defendant’s motion to 

dismiss. Sheri Leonard appeared on behalf of the plaintiff, Marlene Alsup, and Emilie Woodhead 

and Joan Fife appeared on behalf of the defendant, U.S. Bank. 

During the hearing, the plaintiff referred the court to Diaz v. Federal Express 

Corp., 373 F. Supp. 2d 1034 (C.D. Cal. 2005), a case the parties had not previously cited or 

discussed in their briefing. On October 14, 2015, the defendants requested leave to file a 

supplemental brief on the applicability of Diaz, ECF No. 16, and filed a short proposed brief, 

ECF No. 16-1. 

//// 

//// 

//// 

Case 2:14-cv-01515-KJM-AC Document 17 Filed 10/16/14 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Defendant’s request is granted and its supplemental brief is deemed filed as of the 

date its proposed brief was filed. If plaintiff wishes to respond, it may file a brief of five or fewer 

pages no later than seven days from the issuance of this order. Thereafter the matter will be 

submitted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 15, 2014. 

Case 2:14-cv-01515-KJM-AC Document 17 Filed 10/16/14 Page 2 of 2