Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00057/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00057-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

-1-

STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY CASE NO. C13-00057 WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THOMAS E. DUCKWORTH (SBN 152369)

(tom@dplolaw.com)

MONIQUE OLIVIER (SBN 190385)

(monique@dplolaw.com)

DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ OLIVIER LLP

100 Bush Street, Suite 1800

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 433-0333

Facsímile: (415) 449-6556

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA—SAN FRANCISCO

__________________________

FRED BOWERMAN, and JULIA 

BOWERMAN on behalf of themselves and 

all others similarly situated,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

FIELD ASSET SERVICES, LLC, and Does 

1-25,

 Defendants.

Case No. C13-00057 WHO

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY; 

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY SCHEDULE

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have propounded written discovery seeking documents and information

relating to FAS’s business operations and to vendors to whom class notice was sent;

WHEREAS, Defendant has propounded written discovery on vendors to whom class notice was 

sent;

WHEREAS, the Parties have been negotiating in good faith to reach a compromise on this 

outstanding discovery, but have now come to an impasse and need the Court’s guidance; 

Accordingly, the Parties agree to file a joint letter to the Court addressing these outstanding 

discovery issues no later than Tuesday, January 26, 2016.

Case 3:13-cv-00057-WHO Document 110 Filed 01/22/16 Page 1 of 3
-2-

STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY CASE NO. C13-00057 WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Further, the Parties propose the following revised schedule relating to discovery deadlines 

relating to liability only, and agree to set a discovery schedule relating to damages discovery. This 

schedule does not impact any of the other deadlines in this case:

Expert disclosure: April 1, 2016 

Expert rebuttal: April 21, 2016

Fact discovery cutoff: April 21, 2016

Deadline to file joint letters 

on outstanding discovery disputes: May 5, 2016

Expert discovery cutoff: June 17, 2016

Date: January 21, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ OLIVIER LLP

By: /s/ Monique Olivier*

Monique Olivier

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class

Date: January 21, 2016 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

By: /s/Aurelio Perez

Aurelio Perez

Attorneys for Defendant

*I, Monique Olivier, have consent and approval to file on behalf of all parties. 

Case 3:13-cv-00057-WHO Document 110 Filed 01/22/16 Page 2 of 3
-3-

STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY CASE NO. C13-00057 WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

In light of the Parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, the discovery schedule in this case 

is revised as follows:

Expert disclosure: April 1, 2016 

Expert rebuttal: April 21, 2016

Fact discovery cutoff: April 21, 2016

Deadline to file joint letters 

on outstanding discovery disputes: May 5, 2016

Expert discovery cutoff: June 17, 2016

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2016 ________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 3:13-cv-00057-WHO Document 110 Filed 01/22/16 Page 3 of 3