Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00886/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00886-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Charles T. Davis,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-0886 MCE PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

Edward Alameida, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoMarch 9, 2005, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for

violating Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), explained the deficiencies and

gave plaintiff 60 days within which to file an amended complaint

correcting those deficiencies. The 60-day period has expired and

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. March 21, 2005,

plaintiff informed the court he does not intend to file an

amended complaint.

Accordingly, I hereby recommend that this action be 

dismissed for violating Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). See McHenry v. 

Case 2:04-cv-00886-MCE -PAN Document 26 Filed 07/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Renne, 84 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 1996).

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: July 12, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00886-MCE -PAN Document 26 Filed 07/13/05 Page 2 of 2