Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00611/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00611-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCELINO CLEMENTE,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. PARCIASEPE, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-0611 MCE KJN P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 6, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 

39), which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections 

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has 

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly:

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 39) filed March 06, 2015, are 

ADOPTED IN FULL;

///

Case 2:14-cv-00611-MCE-KJN Document 43 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on defendant’s retaliation claim (ECF No. 

29) is GRANTED, and plaintiff’s retaliation claims against defendant are DISMISSED without 

prejudice based on plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and

3. This action now proceeds solely on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim. (ECF No. 39 

at 12.)

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 15, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-00611-MCE-KJN Document 43 Filed 04/16/15 Page 2 of 2