Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05296/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05296-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 130
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40:270 Miller Act

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. 3:14-cv-05296-MEJ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARA E. ROSALES, State Bar No. 104844

mara@rosaleslawpartners.com

Kris A. Cox, State Bar No.136504

kcoxesq@yahoo.com

ROSALES LAW PARTNERS LLP

433 California Street, Suite 630

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 986-4760

Attorneys for Defendant

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and

YERBA BUENA ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC

WILLIAM W. HATCHER, JR. State Bar No. 154664

Hatcher & Rundel

114 Pierce Street

Santa Rosa, CA 95404

Telephone: (707) 542-1921

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MACHADO BROTHERS, INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use 

and benefit of MACHADO BROTHERS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

YERBA BUENA ENGINEERING & 

CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California 

Corporation, and LIBERTY MUTUAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts 

Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, 

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05296-MEJ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James

Case 3:14-cv-05296-MEJ Document 26 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 2
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. 3:14-cv-05296-MEJ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the 

parties that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), the above-referenced 

case, including all requests for relief, whether in the Complaint, and Defendant’s Counterclaim 

or elsewhere, should be DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice and without an award of 

costs or fees to any party. 

Stipulated to and presented to the Court on this 10th day of February 2016.

Dated: February 10, 2016 ROSALES LAW PARTNERS LLP

By: /s/ Kris A. Cox

MARA E. ROSALES

KRIS A. COX

Attorneys for Defendants

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

and YERBA BUENA ENGINEERING & 

CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Dated: February 10, 2016 HATCHER & RUNDEL

By: /s/ William W. Hatcher, Jr.

WILLIAM W. HATCHER, JR.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MACHADO BROTHERS, INC.

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and agreed, it is hereby SO ORDERED. The abovereferenced case is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice and without an award of 

costs or fees to any party. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of 

record.

Dated: ___________, 2016

The Honorable Maria-Elena James

United States District Court Magistrate Judge

February 11

Case 3:14-cv-05296-MEJ Document 26 Filed 02/11/16 Page 2 of 2