Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02128/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02128-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT DODSON,

NO. CIV. S-07-2128 LKK/GGH

Plaintiff,

v.

BIG 5 CORP., dba BIG 5

SPORTING GOODS #294, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES WHICH

THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND

PARTIES MUST COMPLY. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS

ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER

SANCTIONS WITHIN THE POWER OF THE COURT, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN

ORDER OF JUDGMENT. 

Pursuant to court order, a Status (Pretrial Scheduling)

Conference was held in Chambers on February 19, 2008. Scottlynn

J. Hubbard, IV appeared telephonically as counsel for plaintiff;

Case 2:07-cv-02128-LKK -GGH Document 17 Filed 02/22/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Shireen B. Rogers appeared telephonically as counsel for defendant

Big 5 Corporation; Darin T. Judd appeared telephonically for the

Jernigan defendants. After hearing, the court makes the following

findings and orders:

SERVICE OF PROCESS

All parties defendant have been served and no further service

is permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been

shown.

JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS

Defendants Jernigan are hereby granted thirty (30) days to

serve a cross-defendant.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

A further status conference is set for April 28, 2008 at 3:00

p.m. (The parties are reminded that status reports must be filed

and served not later than ten (10) days preceding the status

conference.)

The parties are reminded that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

16(b), the Status (pretrial scheduling) Order shall not be modified

except by leave of court upon a showing of good cause. Counsel are

cautioned that changes to any of the scheduled dates will

necessarily result in changes to all other dates. Thus, even where

good cause has been shown, the court will not grant a request to

change the discovery cutoff date without modifying the pretrial and

trial dates.

Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation does not

constitute good cause. Nor does the unavailability of witnesses

Case 2:07-cv-02128-LKK -GGH Document 17 Filed 02/22/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

or counsel, except in extraordinary circumstances, constitute good

cause.

The parties are reminded of their continuing obligation to

supplement their statements relative to the identification of

parent corporations and any publicly held company that owns 10% or

more of the party's stock within a reasonable time of any change

in the information.

The parties are admonished that they are not to cite or refer

to any of the quotations inscribed in the pavers on the front plaza

of the United States Courthouse in any written or oral presentation

to the court or a jury.

There appear to be no other matters presently pending before

the court that will aid the just and expeditious disposition of

this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 21, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02128-LKK -GGH Document 17 Filed 02/22/08 Page 3 of 3