Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01593/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01593-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Matthew D. Diamond; Susan E. Diamond,

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

One West Bank, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-1593-PHX-FJM

ORDER

The court has before it defendants’ motion for leave to add additional arguments

concerning their motion to dismiss (doc. 32), plaintiffs’ response (doc. 34), and defendants’

reply (doc. 35). Defendants contend that after they filed their motion to dismiss they became

aware of another argument that could be case dispositive. In the interest of judicial economy

we grant the motion to amend. Plaintiffs’ response to the additional argument shall not

exceed 5 pages and is due no later than February 5, 2010. Defendants’ reply shall not exceed

5 pages and is due no later than February 15, 2010. 

We also have before us plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions and for hearing on their

application for temporary restraining order (TRO) (doc. 17) and defendants’ response (doc.

18). The motion for hearing on the TRO is moot because the application for TRO has

already been denied. See doc. 16. 

Case 2:09-cv-01593-FJM Document 37 Filed 01/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The motion for sanctions is without merit. Defendants have withdrawn their notice

that plaintiffs’ ongoing bankruptcy and automatic stay bars the instant action, now

recognizing that the automatic stay no longer applies to the plaintiffs’ residence. There is no

showing to support sanctions under Rule 11, Fed. R. Civ. P.

IT IS ORDERED GRANTING defendants’ motion to amend its motion to dismiss

(doc. 32). The clerk shall file the supplemental briefing attached as exhibit 1 to doc. 32.

IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiffs’ motion for hearing (doc. 17), and

DENYING plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions (doc. 17). 

DATED this 25th day of January, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-01593-FJM Document 37 Filed 01/25/10 Page 2 of 2