Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01406/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01406-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SONNY RAY HARDAWAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

N. OLSEN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01406-LJO-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

TO OBEY A COURT ORDER AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

(Doc. 20)

ORDER THAT THIS DISMISSAL SHALL

COUNT AS A STRIKE PURSUANT TO 28

U.S.C. § 1915(G)

Plaintiff Sonny Ray Hardaway (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 1, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which

was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and

Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Findings and

Recommendations on June 22, 2007.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Plaintiff’s five page Objection is devoid of any grounds justifying his failure to obey the Court’s

order. Plaintiff’s disagreement with the Magistrate Judge’s finding that his complaint does not state

Case 1:06-cv-01406-LJO -LJO Document 21 Filed 06/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a claim is not good cause for failure to obey a court order, and there are no grounds stated that would

support the issuance of an order setting aside the Findings and Recommendations. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 1, 2007, is adopted in full;

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for plaintiff’s failure to obey the Court’s

order of March 28, 2007, and for failure to state a claim; and

3. This dismissal shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 26, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01406-LJO -LJO Document 21 Filed 06/26/07 Page 2 of 2