Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01650/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01650-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BLUE SPIKE, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-01650-YGR 

ORDER RE: REMAINING PATENT CLAIM

Re: Dkt. No. 77

On September 8, 2015, the Court issued an order granting defendant’s motion for judgment 

on the pleadings, finding all patent claims at issue in the motion to be invalid (Dkt. No. 75), and 

issued an order to show cause as to why the sole remaining patent claim at issue in this case, but 

not raised in the motion, should not be held invalid on the same grounds (Dkt. No. 76). The 

parties “do not dispute that Claim 30 of U.S. Patent No. 8,712,728 would be held invalid under the 

Court’s reasoning as to the other asserted claims in its Order Granting Motion for Judgment on the 

Pleadings.” (Dkt. No. 77 at 1-2.) Thus, in the absence of any objection, the Court finds that claim 

invalid for the same reasons discussed in the September 8, 2015 Order at Docket Number 75. As 

all asserted claims have been held invalid, the Court directs defendant to file a proposed form of 

judgment, approved as to form by plaintiff, by no later than September 23, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 18, 2015

______________________________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:14-cv-01650-YGR Document 80 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 1