Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00968/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00968-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STEPHEN JACKSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CLEAR RECON CORP., et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-00968-TLN-AC 

ORDER 

On February 11, 2016, the court issued findings recommending that defendants’ motions 

to dismiss (ECF Nos. 14, 19) be granted, and that plaintiff be granted leave to amend. ECF No. 

30. Those findings and recommendations instructed plaintiff to file an amended complaint 

within thirty days of “the date of service of the presiding district judge’s order.” Id. at 10 

(emphasis added). On March 22, 2016, defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) filed a 

motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution. ECF No. 31. BofA argues that this action should be 

dismissed because plaintiff has failed to comply with the court’s order instructing him to file an 

amended complaint within thirty days. Id. The court’s findings and recommendations, however, 

do not include such an order. Instead, they order plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 

thirty days of the presiding district judge’s order. No such order has been issued to date. 

Accordingly, the court will strike BofA’s motion because it is premature. 

//// 

Case 2:15-cv-00968-TLN-AC Document 32 Filed 03/25/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

In accordance with the foregoing, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that BofA’s motion 

to dismiss, ECF No. 31, is STRICKEN. 

DATED: March 25, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-00968-TLN-AC Document 32 Filed 03/25/16 Page 2 of 2