Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05572/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05572-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADELAIDO PINEDO, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

CAL A. TERHUNE, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

No. CV-F- 02-5572-REC-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 22)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On April 29, 2002, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254 in this Court. (Doc. 1).

On March 7, 2005, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED because

the petition did not state grounds that would entitle Petitioner to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

(Doc. 22). This Report and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections were to be filed within ten days from the date of service of that order. To date, the

parties have not filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

Case 1:02-cv-05572-REC -TAG Document 23 Filed 05/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed March 7, 2005, (Court Doc. 22) is

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 5, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05572-REC -TAG Document 23 Filed 05/05/05 Page 2 of 2