Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02559/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02559-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 In his objections, plaintiff asserts defendant Parker should not be dismissed because

1

plaintiff filed a motion for substitution on September 7, 2006. The court’s record does not reflect

that plaintiff ever filed a motion for substitution with respect to defendant Parker. In any case,

plaintiff fails to assert who should be substituted for defendant Parker. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID RAY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2559 LKK KJM P

vs.

CSP-SOLANO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 17, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Both

parties have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

1

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02559-LKK -KJM Document 87 Filed 03/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 17, 2007 are adopted in full;

2. Defendant Parker is dismissed;

3. Plaintiff’s March 31, 2006 request for a temporary restraining order is denied;

4. Defendants’ April 20, 2006 motion to dismiss is granted;

5. Defendant Solomon is dismissed; and

6. Defendants’ August 31, 2006 motion for summary judgment as to defendant

Rohrer is denied.

DATED: March 29, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-02559-LKK -KJM Document 87 Filed 03/30/07 Page 2 of 2