Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-04485/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-04485-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:9607 Real Property Tort to Land

---

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Second Amended Complaint;

Proposed Briefing Schedule 

Case No.: C09 04485 JF 

292981.5

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROGERS JOSEPH O’DONNELL 

ROBERT C. GOODMAN (State Bar No. 111554) 

ANN M. BLESSING (State Bar No. 172573) 

D. KEVIN SHIPP (State Bar No. 245947) 

311 California Street 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Tel 415.956.2828 

Fax 415.956.6457 

rgoodman@rjo.com, ablessing@rjo.com, kshipp@rjo.com

Attorneys for Defendant CHEVRON CORPORATION 

KIRK C. CHAMBERLIN (State Bar No. 132946) 

PENELOPE S. PARK (State Bar No. 220452) 

CHAMBERLIN KEASTER & BROCKMAN LLP 

16000 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 700 

Encino, CA 91436-2758 

Tel 818.385.1256 

Fax 818.385.1802 

kchamberlin@ckbllp.com, ppark@ckbllp.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff CHUBB CUSTOM INSURANCE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CHUBB CUSTOM INSURANCE 

COMPANY, for itself and as subrogee of, 

and in the name of TAUBE-KORET 

CAMPUS FOR JEWISH LIFE, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

SPACE SYSTEMS/LORAL, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, directly and as 

successor in interest to FORD 

AEROSPACE & COMMUNICATIONS 

CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR 

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, as 

predecessor in interest to FORD 

AEROSPACE & COMMUNICATIONS 

CORPORATION, SUN MICROSYSTEMS, 

INC., a Delaware corporation, CHEVRON 

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 

and HARMAN STEVENSON INC., a 

California corporation, dba KFC, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C-09-04485 JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS CHEVRON 

CORPORATION, SUN 

MICROSYSTEMS, INC., FORD MOTOR 

COMPANY AND HARMANSTEVENSON, INC. TO RESPOND TO 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE; 

DECLARATION OF D. KEVIN SHIPP 

IN SUPPORT THEREOF

 

Amended Complaint Filed: July 23, 2010 

Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel 

-------------------

Case 5:09-cv-04485-JF Document 104 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 4
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Second Amended Complaint;

Proposed Briefing Schedule 

Case No.: C09 04485 JF 

292981.5

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF D. KEVIN SHIPP

1. I am an associate at the law firm of Rogers Joseph O’Donnell, attorneys 

for Defendant Chevron Corporation. I know the following facts on my own personal 

knowledge and if called upon could and would competently testify thereto. 

2. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint was filed on July 23, 2010. 

3. The responses of Defendants Chevron Corporation, Ford Motor 

Company, Harman-Stevenson, Inc. (currently known as Harman-Prudence, Inc.), and Sun 

Microsystems, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) to the Second Amended Complaint are 

otherwise due by August 9, 2010. 

4. Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed to extend the deadline for 

Defendants to respond to the Second Amended Complaint to and including September 8, 

2010. This extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by 

Court order. 

5. Certain Defendants may file a motion to dismiss the Second Amended 

Complaint. 

6. Plaintiff and Defendants have met and conferred regarding the hearing 

date for any such motions as required by the Standing Order Regarding Case Management In 

Civil Cases issued on July 30, 2010, as well as a briefing schedule for such a motion. 

7. Plaintiff and Defendants have been advised by the Court Deputy that 

October 29, 2010 is an available date for any hearing on a motion to dismiss. 

8. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3 Plaintiff’s opposition brief would otherwise 

be due on October 8, 2010 and Defendants’ reply briefs would be due on October 15, 2010. 

9. Plaintiff requested that Defendants agree to modify the briefing 

schedule established by Local Rule 7-3 to accommodate Plaintiff’s counsel’s unavailability 

from September 14 through October 3, 2010. 

10. Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed to extend the time for Plaintiff to 

file an opposition brief by five days to October 13, 2010 and to delay the filing of any reply 

Case 5:09-cv-04485-JF Document 104 Filed 08/13/10 Page 2 of 4
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Second Amended Complaint;

Proposed Briefing Schedule 

Case No.: C09 04485 JF 

292981.5

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

brief by five days to October 20, 2010. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed this 5th day of August 2010 in San Francisco, California. 

 /s/ D. Kevin Shipp 

 D. Kevin Shipp 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b) and Rule 6-2(a), 

by the parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, as follows: 

A. Defendants shall file and serve their response to the Second Amended 

Complaint on or before September 8, 2010. 

B. If Defendants file a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, 

they will request that the motion be heard on October 29, 2010. 

C. If Defendants file a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, 

any opposition brief will be due on October 13, 2010. 

D. If Defendants file a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, 

any reply brief will be due on October 20, 2010. 

Dated: August 5, 2010 CHAMBERLIN KEASTER & BROCKMAN 

LLP 

By: /s/ Kirk C. Chamberlin 

KIRK C. CHAMBERLIN 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

CHUBB CUSTOM INSURANCE COMPANY 

Dated: August 5, 2010 ROGERS JOSEPH O’DONNELL 

By: /s/ D. Kevin Shipp 

D. KEVIN SHIPP 

Attorney for Defendant 

CHEVRON CORPORATION 

Case 5:09-cv-04485-JF Document 104 Filed 08/13/10 Page 3 of 4
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Second Amended Complaint;

Proposed Briefing Schedule 

Case No.: C09 04485 JF 

292981.5

Page 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: August 5, 2010 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 

By: /s/ Katheryn Coggon 

KATHERYN COGGON 

Attorney for Defendant 

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC. 

Dated: August 5, 2010 SHOOK, HARDY AND BACON, L.L.P. 

By: /s/ Kevin T. Haroff 

KEVIN T. HAROFF 

Attorney for Defendant 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY 

Dated: August 5, 2010 McKAY, BURTON, & THURMAN 

By: /s/ Nickolas S. Rice 

NICKOLAS S. RICE 

Attorney for Defendant 

HARMAN-STEVENSON, INC. (currently known 

as Harman-Prudence, Inc.) 

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Kirk C. 

Chamberlin for Plaintiff, Katheryn Coggon for Defendant Sun Microsystems, Inc., Kevin T. 

Haroff for Defendant Ford Motor Company; and Nickolas S. Rice for Defendant HarmanStevenson, Inc. (currently known as Harman-Prudence, Inc.). 

By: /s/ D. Kevin Shipp 

D. KEVIN SHIPP 

Attorney for Defendant 

CHEVRON CORPORATION 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ______________________ By _________________________________ 

 JUDGE JEREMY D. FOGEL 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

8/9/10

Case 5:09-cv-04485-JF Document 104 Filed 08/13/10 Page 4 of 4