Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00999/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00999-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Alejandro Garcia is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On October 4, 2016, the Court issued a discovery and scheduling order in this matter, and 

served by mail on Plaintiff at his address of record. (ECF No. 46.) On October 19, 2016, the discovery 

and scheduling order was returned to the Court with a notation “undeliverable, inactive/refused.” 

Plaintiff is required to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times (Local Rule 

182(f), and Local Rule 183(b) provides, “If mail directed to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk 

is returned by the U.S. Postal Service, and if such plaintiff fails to notify the Court and opposing 

parties within sixty-three (63) days thereafter of a current address, the Court may dismiss the action 

without prejudice for failure to prosecute.” 

///

ALEJANDRO GARCIA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

M. V. BALAGSO, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00999-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE 

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Case 1:14-cv-00999-LJO-SAB Document 47 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff’s address change was due by December 27, 2016, but he failed to file one and he has 

not otherwise been in contact with the Court. Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that

within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why this 

action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2017 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00999-LJO-SAB Document 47 Filed 01/11/17 Page 2 of 2