Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05920/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05920-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO CONDUCT JOINT INSPECTION OF PREMISES 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JULIA M. ADAMS (State Bar No. 230795)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiff PAULA PIAZZA

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PAULA PIAZZA, individually and in her

capacity as conservator of RICHARD L.

PIAZZA; and DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION,

SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FLAMES COFFEE SHOP,

ROBERT L. ANTRACCOLI & RUTH L.

ANTRACCOLI; ELIAS TSIGARIS; GUS

TSIGARIS; PETE TSIGARIS, individuals

dba FLAMES COFFEE SHOP,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-5920 PJH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO

CONDUCT JOINT INSPECTION OF

PREMISES 

Defendants in this matter have informed plaintiffs of the need for an additional thirty

(30) days to continue discussing potential settlement options between themselves. Therefore,

to facilitate settlement discussions between all parties and to increase the likelihood of early

settlement by minimizing attorneys’ fees and costs, the parties hereto agree, stipulate and

request that the last day for the parties and counsel to conduct the joint inspection of the

///

///

///

Case 4:06-cv-05920-PJH Document 16 Filed 02/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO CONDUCT JOINT INSPECTION OF PREMISES 2

 premises be continued to March 5, 2007, and the last day for the parties to complete initial

disclosures to be continued accordingly.

The foregoing is in the best interests of the parties.

Dated: February 2, 2007 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: _____/s/___________________________

Julia M. Adams

Attorneys for Plaintiffs PAULA PIAZZA and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION,

SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP OTHERS

Dated: January 23, 2007 McNICHOLS RANDICK O’DEA & TOOLIATOS

By: _____/s/___________________________

Brian M. O’Dea

Attorneys for Defendants ROBERT L. ANTRACCOLI &

RUTH L. ANTRACCOLI

Dated: January 23, 2007 CLAPP MORONEY BELLAGAMBA VUCINICH

By: ______/s/__________________________

Gregory C. Simonian

Valerie S. Higgins

Attorneys for Defendants ELIAS TSIGARIS; GUS

TSIGARIS; PETE TSIGARIS

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that the last day for the parties to hold the joint inspection of the

premises is continued to March 5, 2007. Further, it is ordered that the last day for the parties

to complete initial disclosures shall be February 26, 2007.

Dated: ________________, 2007 _________________________________________

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

February 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-05920-PJH Document 16 Filed 02/07/07 Page 2 of 2