Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-02205/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-02205-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ramiro Gomez Torres, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Charles Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-10-02205-PHX-NVW

ORDER

Pending before the court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate

Judge Duncan (Doc. 16) regarding petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that the Petition be denied

and dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had

fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 8 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)).

Petitioner filed objections on August 22, 2011. (Doc. 17.) 

The Court has considered the objections and reviewed the Report and

Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the

court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and

Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the

Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the meaning

of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,

Case 2:10-cv-02205-NVW Document 18 Filed 08/29/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge (Doc. 16) is accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying and

dismissing petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(Doc. 1) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action.

Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order

denying Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Court FINDS: Certificate of

Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are Denied. Petitioner has

not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

DATED this 29th day of August, 2011.

Case 2:10-cv-02205-NVW Document 18 Filed 08/29/11 Page 2 of 2