Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04723/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04723-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes

---

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING - 1 - CASE NO. C-05-4723 (MMC) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KIRK E. TROST (State Bar # 127097) 

MADELINE E. MILLER (State Bar # 221568) 

MILLER, OWEN & TROST 

A Professional Corporation 

428 J Street, Suite 400 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 447-7933 

Facsimile: (916) 447-5195 

THOMAS HAAS, City Attorney (State Bar # 045279) 

PAUL VALLE-RIESTRA, Senior Assistant City Attorney (State Bar # 119321) 

MARGARET L. KOTZEBUE, Assistant City Attorney (State Bar # 148592) 

City of Walnut Creek 

P.O. Box 8039 

1666 North Main Street 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: (925) 943-5813 

Facsimile: (925) 256-3501 

Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a 

California Corporation, doing business as SBC 

CALIFORNIA,

 Plaintiffs and Petitioner, 

 v. 

THE CITY OF WALNUT CREEK, 

CALIFORNIA, and THE CITY COUNCIL 

OF THE CITY OF WALNUT CREEK 

 Defendants and Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 05-4723 MMC 

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF 

HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

ORDER APPROVING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Maxine M. Chesney

Dated: July 18, 2006

Case 3:05-cv-04723-MMC Document 83 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING - 2 - CASE NO. C-05-4723 (MMC) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties agree that legislation pending at the state level may affect the 

outcome of the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their 

designated counsel that, pursuant to Local Rule 7-7(b)(1) and 6-1(a), the hearing date for the

Defendant and Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint is continued to 

October 13, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. 

DATED: July 14, 2006 MILLER, OWEN & TROST 

 A Professional Corporation 

 s/Kirk E. Trost 

 Kirk E. Trost 

 Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents 

City of Walnut Creek and the City Council of the 

 City of Walnut Creek 

DATED: July 14, 2006 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN, 

 LLP 

 s/Ronald E. Van Buskirk 

 Ronald E. Van Buskirk 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Petitioner Pacific Bell 

 Telephone Company, a California Corporation, 

 doing business as SBC California 

DATED: July 14, 2006 HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK AND 

 RABKIN, A Professional Corporation 

 s/Bernard A. Burk 

 Bernard A. Burk 

 Attorneys for Intervenor California Cable and 

 Telecommunications Association 

Case 3:05-cv-04723-MMC Document 83 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2