Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01291/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01291-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH W. MILLS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1291 GEB KJM P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed July 1, 2005, petitioner was ordered to file a completed in forma

pauperis affidavit within thirty days. Petitioner was warned that failure to comply with the July 1

order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has

now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01291-GEB -KJM Document 12 Filed 10/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 20, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1/kf

mill1291.fpf

Case 2:05-cv-01291-GEB -KJM Document 12 Filed 10/20/05 Page 2 of 2