Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00121/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00121-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEJANDRO GUZMAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

R. ANDREWS,

Defendant. 

 /

1:05-cv-00121-OWW-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 9)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Alejandro Guzman (“plaintiff”), is a prisoner in

federal custody at Taft Correctional Institute and is proceeding

pro se in this civil rights action apparently pursuant to Bivens

v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403

U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

Rule 72-302.

On July 12, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. To

date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:05-cv-00121-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 12, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED for plaintiff’s failure to

obey the court’s order of May 9, 2005, and for failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 1, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00121-OWW -DLB Document 10 Filed 09/21/05 Page 2 of 2