Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00486/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00486-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Byron Singleton;

Shannon Singleton;

Carlos Velasco;

Courtney Velasco, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Michael J. Adick;

Mary K. Adick;

Stanley Benavidez;

Elyte ATM Services, Inc.;

Elyte Services, LLC;

Elyte Security Services, LLC, 

Defendants. _________________________________

Michael J. Adick;

Mary K. Adick;

Elyte ATM Services, Inc.;

Cross-claimants,

vs.

Stanley Benavidez;

Elyte Services, LLC;

Clara Benavidez,

Cross-Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 09-486-PHX-JAT

ORDER

On February 18, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. (Doc. 138.)

Plaintiffs filed their Memorandum in Support, with the required Affidavit and supporting

Case 2:09-cv-00486-JAT Document 151 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

exhibits, on March 3, 2011. (Doc. 141.) 

Defendants never responded to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. Pursuant to

Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(i), the Court deems Defendants’ failure to respond as

consent to granting the Motion.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 138) in

the amount of $130,000. 

DATED this 19th day of August, 2011.

Case 2:09-cv-00486-JAT Document 151 Filed 08/19/11 Page 2 of 2