Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02187/USCOURTS-ca10-88-02187-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 

---

FI LED 

United States Court of Appeals 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS T~nth Circuit 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, } 

} 

Plaintiff-Appellee, } 

} 

v. } 

} 

FRANCIS POLIFKA; RUTH POLIFKA, } 

} 

Defendants-Appellants, } 

} 

and } 

} 

DENNIS R. PFANNENSTIEL; NOVELINE R. } 

PFANNENSTIEL; BOARD OF COUNTY } 

COMMISSIONERS OF ELLIS COUNTY, KANSAS, } 

} 

Defendants. } 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

FEB 9 1990 

ROBERT L. HOECKER 

Clerk 

No. 88-2187 

(D.C. No. 87-1529K} 

( D. Kan. } 

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a}; 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

submitted without oral argument. 

The cause is therefore ordered 

* This- order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 88-2187 Document: 01019963020 Date Filed: 02/09/1990 Page: 1 
Defendants Francis and Ruth Palifka appeal from a summary 

judgment entered by the district court in favor of plaintiff, 

United States of America, in this action to enforce a contractual 

obligation owed to the Small Business Administration (SBA). 

The district court held the Polifkas liable to SBA on a 

promissory note executed by defendants Dennis and Noveline 

Pfannenstiel in favor of the Hayes State Bank (formerly, Hayes 

National Bank), pursuant to an assumption agreement subsequently 

executed between these defendants. Finding the arguments raised 

by the Polifkas on this appeal to be without merit, we affirm the 

ruling of the district court. 

The judgment of the United States District Court for the 

District of Kansas is AFFIRMED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

PER CURIAM 

2 

Appellate Case: 88-2187 Document: 01019963020 Date Filed: 02/09/1990 Page: 2