Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01898/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01898-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

Plaintiff, No. 2:05-cv-1898 JAM EFB P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On October 4, 2012, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s order filed

September 25, 2012, which denied plaintiff’s motion to compel and related motions for sanctions

and to modify the scheduling order. The court construes plaintiff’s objections as a motion for

reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s order shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that

it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed September 25, 2012, is affirmed. 

DATED: November 30, 2012

/s/ John A. Mendez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE/

1

Case 2:05-cv-01898-JAM-EFB Document 80 Filed 12/03/12 Page 1 of 1