Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03640/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-03640-31/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC 

and MCM PORTFOLIO LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CANON, INC. et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

No. C 14-3640 CW

(DMR)

ORDER ON MOTIONS 

FOR LEAVE TO 

AMEND

(Docket Nos. 343, 344, 

349, 351, 353)

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC 

and MCM PORTFOLIO LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,

Defendant.

________________________________/

No. C 14-3643 CW

(DMR)

(Docket Nos. 118, 119, 

122, 123)

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC 

and MCM PORTFOLIO LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

No. C 14-3646 CW

(DMR)

(Docket Nos. 119, 120, 

123, 124, 126)

The above matters have been referred to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu for resolution of 

the parties’ motions for leave to amend invalidity contentions and infringement contentions and 

exhibits thereto, along with related administrative motions to file under seal. [See Docket Nos. 354 

(No. C 14-3640), 124 (No. C 14-3643), 127 (No. C 14-3646).] The motions are denied without 

prejudice, with one exception discussed below (Docket No. 353 (No. C 14-3640)). The parties are 

Case 4:14-cv-03640-CW Document 360 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ordered to comply with the court’s Standing Order regarding resolution of discovery disputes and 

to meet and confer to try to resolve their disagreements. If disagreements remain after meeting and 

conferring, the parties may submit their disputes for resolution in the form of joint letter briefs. 

The parties may file one joint letter that does not exceed eight pages regarding Defendants’ motion 

for leave to amend their invalidity contentions, and one joint letter that does not exceed eight pages 

regarding Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their infringement contentions and any exhibits 

thereto. Any joint letters regarding the pending disputes must be filed by no later than November 

20, 2015.

The court has received Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend Exhibit 27 of their 

infringement contentions pertaining to Defendants Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc. [Docket No. 

353 (No. C 14-3640).] By no later than November 6, 2015, Defendants Canon Inc. and Canon 

U.S.A., Inc. shall file a statement indicating whether they oppose the motion. Plaintiffs shall 

submit a proposed order on the motion to dmrpo@cand.uscourts.gov by November 9, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 5, 2015

DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:14-cv-03640-CW Document 360 Filed 11/05/15 Page 2 of 2