Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00609/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00609-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ATAIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY f/k/a USF INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Michigan Corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SIERRA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT 

COMPANY, a California Corporation; 

CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a California corporation.

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-0609-TLN-DAD

ORDER PERMITTING THE 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO 

RESOLVE THE PENDING

DISCOVERY DISPUTE

[Filed Concurrently with Ex Parte 

Application and Declaration of Lance D. 

Orloff]

CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a California corporation,

Counter-Claimant,

vs.

ATAIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY f/k/a USF INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Michigan Corporation; and 

ROES 1 through 20, inclusive.

Counter-Defendants.

Case 2:14-cv-00609-TLN-DB Document 36 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 2
2

________________________________________________________________________________________

ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a California corporation,

Third-Party Plaintiff,

vs.

JERRY LEE and BETTY LEE, 

Third-Party Defendants.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, 

Notwithstanding the Pretrial Scheduling Order [ECF No. 27] Paragraph IV,

United States Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd may consider and resolve the pending 

discover dispute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2015 

Case 2:14-cv-00609-TLN-DB Document 36 Filed 07/07/15 Page 2 of 2