Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07388/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07388-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No.C-06-7388

pa-1127251 v1

KARL J. KRAMER (CA SBN 136433) (kkramer@mofo.com)

ANNA ERICKSON WHITE (CA SBN 161385) (awhite@mofo.com)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018

Telephone: (650) 813-5600

Facsimile: (650) 494-0792

Attorneys for defendant

ALTERA CORPORATION

G. HOPKINS GUY, III (CA SBN 124811) (hopguy@orrick.com)

JEFFREY A. MILLER (CA SBN 160602) (jmiller@orrick.com)

KEVIN C. JONES (CA SBN 240205) (kjones@orrick.com)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 614-7400

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401

Attorneys for Defendant

ACTEL CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

ZILOG, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff, v.

ALTERA CORP., a Delaware corporation, and 

ACTEL CORP., a California corporation

Defendants. Case No. C-06-7388-SBA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong

Complaint filed: December 1, 2006

Case 4:06-cv-07388-SBA Document 17 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 1 of 4

XXXXXXXX

Case 4:06-cv-07388-SBA Document 19 Filed 01/30/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

C-06-7388

pa-1127251 v1

1

Plaintiff ZiLOG, Inc. (“ZiLOG”), Defendant Altera Corporation (“Altera”) and Defendant 

Actel Corporation (“Actel”), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and 

agree as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has sued Altera and Actel (collectively, “Defendants”) for alleged 

infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,670,749 (“the ‘749 patent”);

WHEREAS, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“U.S.P.T.O.”) granted an ex parte 

request for reexamination of the ‘749 patent, and the reexamination is pending;

WHEREAS, on January 5, 2007, ZiLOG and Altera stipulated to an extension of time to 

respond to ZiLOG’s complaint granting Altera until January 30, 2007 to answer or otherwise 

respond to the complaint.

WHEREAS, on January 9, 2007, ZiLOG and Actel stipulated to an extension of time to 

respond to ZiLOG’s complaint granting Actel until January 30, 2007 to answer or otherwise 

respond to the complaint.

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2007, Actel filed an unopposed motion to stay. Altera joined 

the motion. NOW, THEREFORE, the ZiLOG, Altera and Actel stipulate and agree as follows:

1. The time by which Defendants may plead or otherwise respond to the complaint 

shall be extended to and include March 1, 2007.

2. There shall be no further extensions of time granted to Defendants by ZiLOG 

extending the time for Defendants to respond to the complaint. 

3. If the Court grants Actel’s motion to stay, the parties agree that Defendants’

response to the complaint will be due fourteen days after the stay is lifted, unless otherwise 

ordered by the Court. 

4. The stipulated extension does not otherwise affect the schedule of this case. 

Case 4:06-cv-07388-SBA Document 17 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 2 of 4
 Case 4:06-cv-07388-SBA Document 19 Filed 01/30/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

C-06-7388

pa-1127251 v1

2

Dated: January 26, 2007 KARL J. KRAMER

ANNA ERICKSON WHITE

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: s/ Karl J. Kramer

Karl J. Kramer

Attorneys for Defendant

ALTERA CORPORATION

Dated: January 26, 2007 G. HOPKINS GUY, III 

JEFFREY A. MILLER 

KEVIN C. JONES

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

By: s/ Jeffrey A. Miller

Jeffrey A. Miller

Attorneys for Defendant

ACTEL CORPORATION

Dated: January 26, 2007 GEORGIA K. VAN ZANTEN

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: s/ Georgia K. Van Zanten

Georgia K. Van Zanten

Attorney for Plaintiff

ZILOG, INC.

ORDER

The foregoing stipulation is approved and so ordered.

Dated: ______________, 2007.

Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:06-cv-07388-SBA Document 17 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 3 of 4

1/30

Case 4:06-cv-07388-SBA Document 19 Filed 01/30/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

C-06-7388

pa-1127251 v1

3

ATTESTATION

I, Karl J. Kramer, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file 

Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45, 

X.B., I hereby attest that Georgia K. Van Zanten and Jeffrey A. Miller have read and approved 

this stipulation. I will maintain an executed copy of this stipulation in our files that can be made 

available for inspection upon request.

Dated: January 26, 2007 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: s/ Karl J. Kramer

 Karl J. Kramer

 Attorneys for Defendant Altera Corporation

Case 4:06-cv-07388-SBA Document 17 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 4 of 4
 Case 4:06-cv-07388-SBA Document 19 Filed 01/30/07 Page 4 of 4