Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alsd-1_13-cv-00419/USCOURTS-alsd-1_13-cv-00419-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EMMA PRASSENOS, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-00419-KD-C

)

E.I. DuPONT DE NEMOURS AND )

COMPANY and BENEFLEX EMPLOYEE )

LIFE INSURANCE PLAN OF E.I. DuPONT )

DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, )

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no 

objections filed,1 the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) of the Magistrate Judge made 

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated March 17, 2014, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this 

Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) is 

DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the Defendants’ request in the alternative to strike the 

Plaintiff’s jury demand (Doc. 7 at 2 n.1) is GRANTED and that the Plaintiff’s jury demand is 

STRICKEN.

DONE and ORDERED this the 2nd day of April 2014.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 1 The Court has reviewed the Defendants’ “Response to Report and Recommendation of Magistrate 

Judge” (Doc. 19) but does not deem it to be an objection warranting de novo review under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1).

Case 1:13-cv-00419-KD-C Document 20 Filed 04/02/14 Page 1 of 1