Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05453/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05453-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOHAMMED ABDALLA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

M.C. KRAMER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:02-cv-05453-REC-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 103)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 71)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

DEFENDANTS FROM ACTION

Mohammed Abdalla (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 14, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On May 3, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:02-cv-05453-LJO -SMS Document 106 Filed 05/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 14, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendant Bird’s, Sydenstricker’s, and Witmer’s motion

for summary judgment, filed July 5, 2005, is GRANTED; and,

3. Defendants Bird, Sydenstricker, and Witmer are

therefore DISMISSED from this action.

The action is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge

for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 26, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05453-LJO -SMS Document 106 Filed 05/30/06 Page 2 of 2