Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03114/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03114-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXPERT AND 

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY 

LEGAL_US_W # 54025251.1 

-1- CASE NO. C04-03114 RMW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

JAMES A. HUGHES (SBN 88380) 

SULLWOLD & HUGHES 

235 Montgomery Street, Suite 730 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 263-1850 

Facsimile: (415) 989-9798 

Attorneys for Defendants 

INTEGRITY DATA APPLICATIONS CONSULTING, LLC, 

and JONATHAN BALZORA 

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 

CHRISTOPHER J. KELLER (Bar No. 178491) 

One Market Plaza 

Steuart Tower, 8th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 781-7900 

Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

iSMART INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and 

Counterdefendant RAJ DHESIKAN 

PAUL HASTINGS JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 

MICHAEL N. EDELMAN (Bar No. 180948) 

Five Palo Alto Square, Sixth Floor 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 

Telephone: (650) 320-1800 

Facsimile: (650) 320-1900 

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 

I-DOCSECURE, LLC; E-NETSECURE SERVICES, INC., 

ISMART SECURE LLC and JOSEPH BAGGIO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ISMART INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, an India 

Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

I-DOCSECURE, LLC, a California Limited 

Liability Company; E-NETSECURE SERVICES, 

INC., a California Corporation; INTEGRITY 

DATA APPLICATIONS CONSULTING, LLC, a 

California Limited Liability Company; JOSEPH 

BAGGIO, an individual; and JONATHAN 

BALZORA, an individual, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: C 04-03114 RMW 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

RE EXPERT AND NON-EXPERT 

DISCOVERY 

AND RELATED COUNTER CLAIM 

Case 5:04-cv-03114-RMW Document 250 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXPERT AND 

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY 

LEGAL_US_W # 54025251.1 

-2- CASE NO. C04-03114 RMW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto through their 

respective undersigned counsel: 

 WHEREAS, the parties previously agreed that fact depositions in this case would occur 

in August or September, assuming Plaintiff’s Motion to Disqualify Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker 

(“Motion to Disqualify”) is denied; 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s June 13, 2006 Order, the deadline for initial expert 

disclosures is July 17, 2006; the deadline for rebuttal expert disclosures is August 7, 2006; and the 

deadline for completion of expert discovery is August 25, 2006; 

 WHEREAS, the parties wish to conduct fact depositions before submitting expert 

disclosures and conducting fact discovery; 

 WHEREAS, absent modification of the deadlines in the Court’s June 13, 2006 Order, 

the parties would be conducting expert disclosure and discovery before fact depositions had been 

taken; 

 WHEREAS, various written discovery has been propounded by both parties and 

responses are due on various dates in July; 

 WHEREAS, the parties have noticed or subpoenaed depositions for various dates 

throughout July, or otherwise indicated that they wish to notice additional depositions for July;

 WHEREAS, the parties agree that the aforementioned factors provide good cause for 

modification of certain deadlines set by the Case Management Conference Order; 

 NOW, THEREFORE THE PARTIES THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL HEREBY 

STIPULATE AND AGREE that, subject to approval of the Court, an Order should issue continuing 

the dates in the June 13, 2006 Order as follows: 

1. The deadline for expert witness disclosures shall be August 18, 2006; 

2. The deadline for rebuttal expert disclosures shall be September 8, 2006; 

3. The deadline to complete expert witness discovery shall be September 22, 2006; 

 4. The deadline to file dispositive motions shall be September 22, 2006. 

Case 5:04-cv-03114-RMW Document 250 Filed 08/02/06 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXPERT AND 

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY 

LEGAL_US_W # 54025251.1 

-3- CASE NO. C04-03114 RMW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4. Plaintiff shall have until August 4, 2006 to answer the outstanding discovery 

requests; 

5. The Defendants shall have until August 8, 2006 to answer the outstanding discovery 

requests; 

6. The parties will meet and confer to determine mutually convenient dates for nonexpert depositions and will use their best efforts to schedule non-expert depositions before the relevant 

expert disclosures are due. 

 7. The parties are agreeing to these dates on the assumption that the Motion to Disqualify is 

denied. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: July 14, 2006 SULLWOLD & HUGHES 

 /s/ 

JAMES A. HUGHES 

Attorneys for Defendants INTEGRITY DATA 

APPLICATIONS CONSULTING, LLC and 

JONATHAN BALZORA 

DATED: July 14, 2006 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 

By: /s/ 

CHRISTOPHER J. KELLER 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant ISMART 

INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and Counter-defendant 

RAJ DHESIKAN 

DATED: July 14, 2006 PAUL, HASTING, JANOFSKY & WALKER, LLP 

By: /s/ 

MICHAEL EDELMAN 

Defendants and Counterclaimants I-DOCSECURE, LLC, 

E-NETSECURE SERVICES, INC., ISMART SECURE 

LLC and JOSEPH BAGGIO 

Case 5:04-cv-03114-RMW Document 250 Filed 08/02/06 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXPERT AND 

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY 

LEGAL_US_W # 54025251.1 

-4- CASE NO. C04-03114 RMW 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________, 2006 

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte 

United States District Judge 

Case 5:04-cv-03114-RMW Document 250 Filed 08/02/06 Page 4 of 4