Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03251/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03251-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN F. HANCOCK, 

Plaintiff(s),

 v.

WARDEN AYERS, et al.,

Defendant(s).

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 04-3251 CRB (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

(Doc # 17)

Per order filed on January 18, 2005, the court found that plaintiff’s pro se

civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 stated a cognizable claim for 

deliberate indifference to his safety needs, when liberally construed, and ordered

the United States Marshal to serve five named defendants at Pelican Bay State

Prison. A copy of the order was mailed to plaintiff at his last address of record:

Sai Hotel, Room 9, 964 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94103.

On January 24, 2005, the post office returned the court’s mail to plaintiff as

undeliverable, with an annotation to the effect that plaintiff had moved and left no

forwarding address. (Defendants have informed the court that their mail to

plaintiff has also been returned as undeliverable.) Because more than 60 days have

passed since the court's mail to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable, and the

court has received no written communication from plaintiff indicating a current

address, the case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 3-11(b). 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

The clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending motions (see, e.g.,

doc # 17) and hearing dates as moot. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: Nov. 30, 2005 

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge