Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01205/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01205-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Stipulation and order Case No. C05-01205 JSW 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

JAMES B. CHANIN (SBN# 76043)

JULIE M. HOUK (SBN# 114968)

Law Offices of James B. Chanin

3050 Shattuck Avenue

Berkeley, California 94705

Telephone: (510) 848-4752

Facsimile: (510) 848-5819

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID GREENSLADE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C05-01205 JSW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT 

AND FUTURE PROCEEDINGS

Whereas, the City of Oakland City Council approved the settlement in this matter on 

September 19, 2006, and additional time is necessary for the City of Oakland to process payment 

of the settlement proceeds to the plaintiff and his counsel, 

THE PARTIES DO HEREBY STIPULATE, AGREE AND REQUEST THAT the Court 

vacate the current trial date, pretrial date and other deadlines for pretrial preparation in this case 

and that the Court set a Status Conference in sixty days. The parties anticipate that prior to the 

Status Conference, a Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice and Order Thereon will be filed 

with the Court. In the event that the Stipulation for Dismissal has not been filed prior to the 

Status Conference, counsel for the parties will be appear for the Status Conference to discuss the 

status of the settlement and set a trial date if necessary.

Case 3:05-cv-01205-JSW Document 26 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cv-01205-JSW Document 27 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation and order Case No. C05-01205 JSW 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: September 29, 2006 ____________/S/_______________________

JAMES B. CHANIN

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: September 29, 2006 ___________/s/___________________________

STEPHEN Q. ROWELL

Attorney for Defendants

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered the foregoing stipulation and for good cause shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The trial date, pretrial conference date and other deadlines for pretrial preparation are 

hereby vacated;

2. Counsel for the parties shall file a Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice 

within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order or file a Joint Status Conference Statement 

explaining why a Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice has not been filed;

3. In the event that the parties have failed to file a Stipulation and Order for Dismissal 

with Prejudice within sixty (60) days, counsel for the parties shall appear at a Status Conference 

on ___________________________, at __________ a.m/p.m. to discuss the status of the case 

and set a trial date. The Joint Status Conference statement shall be filed at least ten (10) days 

prior to the Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED :

Dated: ________________, 2006 ________________________________

JEFFREY S. WHITE

Judge of the United States

District Court

Case 3:05-cv-01205-JSW Document 26 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 2 of 2

January 26, 2007

1:30

October 3

Case 3:05-cv-01205-JSW Document 27 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2