Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04671/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04671-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

COOLEY GODWARD LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C 06-04671 JW 

COOLEY GODWARD LLP 

JOHN C. DWYER (136533) (dwyerjc@cooley.com) 

CHRISTOPHER J. SUNDERMEIER (166126) (sundermeierc@cooley.com) 

LAURA R. SMITH (205159) (laura.smith@cooley.com) 

Five Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 

Telephone: (650) 843-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 857-0663 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

JESSE BROWN, Derivatively on Behalf of 

Nominal Defendant CHORDIANT 

SOFTWARE, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STEPHEN KELLY, CARY G. MORGAN, 

STEVE G. VOGEL, SAMUEL T. 

SPADAFORA, DONALD J. MORRISON, 

ALLEN SWANN, JEREMY COOTE, 

DAVID R. SPRINGETT, 

WILLIAM RADUCHEL, and STEVEN R. 

SPRINGSTEEL, 

Defendants, 

and 

CHORDIANT SOFTWARE, INC. 

Nominal Defendant. 

Case No. C 06-04671 JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE 

COMPLAINT 

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff and Defendants through their 

respective attorneys of record. 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Shareholder Derivative Complaint (“Complaint”) was filed on 

August 1, 2006; 

Case 5:06-cv-04671-JW Document 8 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 3
COOLEY GODWARD LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C 06-04671 JW 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Nominal Defendant Chordiant (“Chordiant”) with the 

Complaint on August 11, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Chordiant’s response to the Complaint is due on August 31, 2006; 

WHEREAS, without waiving any defense, counsel for Defendants has agreed to accept 

service on behalf of all individual defendants; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that all of the defendants may have until October 20 

2006 to respond to the Complaint; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned and so ordered by the 

Court as follows: 

1. The defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before October 20, 2006. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: August 30, 2006 COOLEY GODWARD LLP 

 /s/ 

Laura R. Smith 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CHORDIANT SOFTWARE, INC.; STEPHEN 

KELLY, CARY G. MORGAN, STEVE G. 

VOGEL, SAMUEL T. SPADAFORA, 

DONALD J. MORRISON, ALLEN SWANN, 

JEREMY COOTE, DAVID R. SPRINGETT, 

WILLIAM RADUCHEL, and STEVEN R. 

SPRINGSTEEL 

Case 5:06-cv-04671-JW Document 8 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 3
COOLEY GODWARD LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PALO ALTO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C 06-04671 JW 

Dated: August 30, 2006 SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

 /s/ 

Sandra Smith 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS 

APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED:_____________________________ ____________________________________ 

Honorable James Ware 

United States District Judge 

Northern District of California 

735520 v1/PA 

September 5, 2006

Case 5:06-cv-04671-JW Document 8 Filed 09/05/06 Page 3 of 3