Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00088/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00088-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE BLAINE,

Plaintiff,

v.

DARRELL ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00088-LJO-SMS PC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

(Doc. 62)

On February 20, 2007, plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court deny defendants’ motion

to compel and stating that defendants’ counsel sent him a letter in which counsel expressed

dissatisfaction with plaintiff’s discovery responses. Plaintiff perceives this contact as harassment.

Defendants’ motion to compel was granted on January 26, 2007, and plaintiff’s previous

objection was addressed on February 9, 2007. (Docs. 51, 61.) Those issues are no longer pending

before this Court. If defendants are dissatisfied with plaintiff’s discovery responses, they are acting

properly by voluntarily attempting to resolve the dispute with plaintiff by letter prior to seeking court

intervention. Plaintiff is directed to review paragraph five of the Court’s discovery order.

There are no discovery disputes pending before the Court at this and plaintiff’s motion for

relief is HEREBY DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 22, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00088-DGC Document 64 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 1