Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00482/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00482-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- Case No. 3:10-cv-00482 (CRB)

AIA’S AND LILLY’S STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON MOTION TO SEVER

BRYAN CAVE LLP 

Robert Padway, California Bar No. 48439 

Berrie Goldman, California Bar No. 246061 

K. Lee Marshall, pro hac vice 

Ameer Gado, pro hac vice

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 675-3400 

Facsimile: (415) 675-3434 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ALZHEIMER’S INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC. 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

Robert F. McCauley III, Caliofrnia Bar No. 162056 

Robert F. Shaffer, pro hac vice

330 Hillview Aveune 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ALZHEIMER’S INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, 

INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ELAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ANASPEC INC., 

IMMUNO-BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES, 

INC., THE JACKSON LABORATORY, 

PHOENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and 

AMERICAN PEPTIDE COMPANY, INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:10-CV-00482 (CRB) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REQUESTING CONTINUANCE 

OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT ELI 

LILLY AND COMPANY’S MOTION TO 

SEVER AND TRANSFER 

[Filed pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2] 

Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

Date: September 3, 2010 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 8 

 

Case 3:10-cv-00482-EDL Document 94 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- Case No. 3:10-cv-00482 (CRB)

AIA’S AND LILLY’S STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON MOTION TO SEVER

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Alzheimer’s Institute of America, Inc. (“AIA”) and 

Defendant Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”) submit this stipulated request for a continuance of the 

hearing on Lilly’s Motion to Sever and Transfer. 

Lilly filed its Motion on July 30, 2010, noticing a hearing before this Court on September 3, 

2010 (Docket No. 85). To eliminate scheduling conflicts relating to the intervening briefing schedule, 

AIA and Lilly hereby stipulate to and request a continuance of the hearing on Lilly’s Motion to Sever 

and Transfer to September 24, 2010, or thereafter, at the convenience of the Court. AIA shall respond 

to the Motion to Sever and Transfer not less than 28 days before the hearing date. Lilly shall file its 

reply, if any, not less than 14 days before the hearing date, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(c). 

Dated: August 5, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

BRYAN CAVE LLP

By: /s/ Berrie R. Goldman 

Robert Padway (Bar No. 48439_ 

Berrie Goldman (Bar No. 246061) 

K. Lee Marshall, pro hac vice 

Ameer Gado, pro hac vice

Bryan Cave LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ALZHEIMER’S INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC. 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

By: /s/ Robert F. Shaffer 

Robert F. McCauley III, Caliofrnia Bar No. 162056 

Robert F. Shaffer, pro hac vice

330 Hillview Aveune 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 

Case 3:10-cv-00482-EDL Document 94 Filed 08/09/10 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3- Case No. 3:10-cv-00482 (CRB)

AIA’S AND LILLY’S STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON MOTION TO SEVER

DECLARATION OF BERRIE GOLDMAN IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATED REQUEST 

I, Berrie R. Goldman, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice before this Court and all courts of the State of 

California. I am an associate with Bryan Cave LLP, counsel for Alzheimer’s Institute of America, Inc. 

(“AIA”) in the above-referenced action. 

2. The contents of this declaration are based upon my personal knowledge and are true and 

correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. If called to testify, I could and would testify thereto. 

3. The contents of the foregoing Stipulated Request are true and correct to the best of my 

knowledge and belief. 

4. Counsel for AIA has scheduling conflicts that interfere with their ability to properly 

oppose Lilly’s Motion to Sever and Transfer. 

5. Counsel for Defendant Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”), the only defendant affected by 

this request, has stipulated to the requested extension of time. 

6. This Court previously granted Lilly’s Unopposed Motion to Change Time to Respond 

to the First Amended Complaint, extending each defendants’ time to answer or otherwise respond by 

90 days and continuing the Case Management Conference from May 14, 2010 to August 12, 2010 

(Docket No. 26). The Case Management Conference was subsequently continued to October 22, 2010 

pursuant to stipulation and order (Docket No. 84). 

7. Other than the hearing on Lilly’s Motion to Sever and Transfer, no other scheduled 

hearings will be affected by this extension. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true 

and correct. 

Dated: August 5, 2010 

By: /s/ Berrie R. Goldman 

 Berrie R. Goldman 

Case 3:10-cv-00482-EDL Document 94 Filed 08/09/10 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-4- Case No. 3:10-cv-00482 (CRB)

AIA’S AND LILLY’S STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON MOTION TO SEVER

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulated request of 

Plaintiff Alzheimer’s Institute of America, Inc. (“AIA”) and Defendant Eli Lilly and Company 

(“Lilly”) is GRANTED. 

1. The hearing on the Motion to Sever and Transfer is continued to September 24, 

2010, or thereafter, at the convenience of the court. 

2. AIA shall respond to the Motion to Sever and Transfer not less than 28 days 

before the hearing date. 

3. Lilly shall file its Reply, if any, not less than 14 days before the hearing date, in 

accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(c). 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 

Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

U.S. District Court Judge, 

Northern District of California 

August 6, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:10-cv-00482-EDL Document 94 Filed 08/09/10 Page 4 of 4