Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-02526/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-02526-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 09cv2526

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRACE L. SANDOVAL,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 09cv2526 JM(JMA)

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

vs. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

ROBIN SOTO

Defendant.

Over the past several years, Plaintiff Grace L. Sandoval has filed in excess of 90 separate

actions in this district. 08cv1297, 08cv1621, 08cv1622, 08cv1623, 08cv1848, 08cv1849, 08cv1853,

98cv1854, 08cv1868, 08cv1869, 08cv1870, 08cv1944, 08cv2004, 08cv2005, 08cv2057, 08cv2104,

08cv2105, 08cv2151, 09cv0269, 09cv0422, 09cv423, 09cv0424, 09cv0437, 09cv0438, 09cv0441,

09cv0454, 09cv0455, 09cv0456, 09cv0474, 09cv0475, 09cv0476, 09cv0477, 09cv0478, 09cv0491,

09cv0492, 09cv0493, 09cv0494, 09cv0495, 09cv582, 09cv0583, 09cv585, 09cv586, 09cv0588,

09cv0600, 09cv0642, 09cv1232, 09cv1506, 09cv1506, 09cv1507, 09cv1508, 09cv1514, 09cv1515,

09cv1520, 09cv1524, 09cv1526, 09cv1849, 09cv2122, 09cv2141, 09cv2148, 09cv2204, 09cv2205,

09cv2206, 09cv2217, 09cv2218, 09cv2217, 09cv2218, 09cv2244, 09cv2245, 09cv2250, 09cv2251,

09cv2252, 09cv2304, 09cv2305, 09cv2306, 09cv2307, 09cv2308, 09cv2309, 09cv2310, 09cv2311,

09cv2312, 09cv2313, 09cv2450, 09cv2452, 09cv2453, 09cv2462,09cv2463, 09cv2464, 09cv2465,

09cv2466, 09cv2467. Each action was brought in propria persona and in forma pauperis. Each

appears to have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. The present complaint fairs

Case 3:09-cv-02526-JM-JMA Document 5 Filed 11/13/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 09cv2526

no better. 

Without identifying the basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the complaint sets forth

a rambling narrative of charges and conclusions concerning an alleged attack while she was at the

Health Center. As the present complaint, like the scores of previously filed complaints, fails to

identify any basis for federal jurisdiction, or to set forth a coherent statement of her claims, the court

dismisses the complaint at bar as frivolous, for failure to state a claim, and for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction.

The Clerk of Court is instructed to dismiss the action without prejudice. Until Plaintiff pays

the filing fee or demonstrates an imminent danger of serious physical injury, the Clerk of Court is

instructed to reject for filing any further documents from Plaintiff in this case. The court also denies

Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 13, 2009

 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller

 United States District Judge

cc: All parties

Case 3:09-cv-02526-JM-JMA Document 5 Filed 11/13/09 Page 2 of 2