Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00118/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00118-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CANDY KELLY, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. )

)

EVERETT R. ECHOLS, II, M.D., )

an individual, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

)

 )

1:05-CV-00118-AWI-SMS

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DENY

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT (DOCS. 59, 61, 65)

Plaintiffs are proceeding with a civil action in this Court.

The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302(c)(1) and 72-303.

On December 7, 2006, Plaintiff filed a motion for default

judgment, including a notice, an application for the judgment, a

memorandum of supporting points and authorities, and a request

for a prove-up hearing. On February 7, 2007, the Court filed

findings and a recommendation to deny Plaintiff’s motion for

default judgment. The findings and recommendation were served on

all parties on February 7, 2007, and contained notice that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed

within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. No

party has filed any objections.

Case 1:05-cv-00118-AWI -DLB Document 70 Filed 03/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the report and recommendation are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation filed February 7, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment IS DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00118-AWI -DLB Document 70 Filed 03/20/07 Page 2 of 2