Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01243/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01243-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The failure of one or more of the parties to 1

participate in the preparation of the Joint Status Report does

not excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file

a status report in accordance with this Order. In the event a

party fails to participate as ordered, the party timely

submitting the status report shall include a declaration

explaining why it was unable to obtain the cooperation of the

other party or parties.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REUBEN & KATHERINE TOLENTINO, )

et al., )

) 2:07-CV-01243-GEB-GGH

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

) CONFERENCE

JEFFREY A. MOSSMAN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

)

Plaintiff’s Status Report filed September 17, 2007, reveals

this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for October 1, 2007 is continued

to December 10, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be

filed no later than November 26, 2007.1

Plaintiff is hereby notified that this action may be

dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rules Civil Procedures

4(m)as to any defendant not served by October 23, 2007. To avoid

dismissal, a proof of service shall be filed for each defendant no

Case 2:07-cv-01243-GEB-GGH Document 76 Filed 09/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

later than October 24, 2007.

If Plaintiff believes it has good cause to justify extension

of Rule 4(m)’s 120-day service period for any defendant not served on

or before October 23, 2007, it shall file a declaration no later than

October 23, 2007, showing "good cause" why the action should not be

dismissed without prejudice as to that defendant. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

September 28, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:07-cv-01243-GEB-GGH Document 76 Filed 09/28/07 Page 2 of 2