Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02534/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02534-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP, dba VERIZON WIRELESS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 04-02534 SI

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE STAY

On November 15, 2004, this Court signed the parties’ stipulation to stay this action pending the

Ninth Circuit’s decision in the appeal of MetroPCS v. CCSF, 259 F.Supp. 1004 (N.D.Cal. 2003). The

parties were ordered to submit a Joint Case Management Conference statement in this case within two

weeks of the decision on appeal of the MetroPCS case.

The MetroPCS decision was issued in March, 2005, but the docket reflects no further activity

in this case, save the filing of the related case notice in Case No. 05-4056 SI, pending between the

parties.

The parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, filed no later than June 16, 2006,

why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 8, 2006 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-02534-SI Document 19 Filed 06/09/06 Page 1 of 1