Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00118/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00118-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PATRICIO ENTERPRISES, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. No. 2:13-cv-0118 KJM GGH PS 

ORDER 

On September 30, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully 

reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 

and by the proper analysis. 

///// 

///// 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:13-cv-00118-KJM-GGH Document 18 Filed 03/03/14 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed September 

30, 2013, are ADOPTED and defendant United States is dismissed from this action without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

DATED: February 28, 2014. 

Case 2:13-cv-00118-KJM-GGH Document 18 Filed 03/03/14 Page 2 of 2