Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01807/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01807-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROYLENE RAY and KELLY CANNON,

individually and on behalf of other similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

BLUEHIPPO FUNDING, LLC,

Defendant. /

No. C 06-01807 JSW

ORDER REGARDING

DISCOVERY LETTER

Now before the Court is Defendant BlueHippo Funding, LLC’s and Plaintiffs Roylene

Ray and Kelly Cannon’s joint letter brief dated October 3, 2007 setting out the parties’ dispute

over their current discovery obligations. 

To the extent there are outstanding discovery requests that bear on issues relating to the

proper venue of this matter, those discovery requests are not stayed. To the extent there are

outstanding discovery requests that do not bear on the issue of venue, that discovery is stayed. 

Should the parties dispute the nature of the particular discovery requests, the parties may file

another joint letter brief, attaching the particular requests, for the Court’s review. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 10, 2007 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-01807-JSW Document 80 Filed 10/10/07 Page 1 of 1