Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-05096/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-05096-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

Case No.: 5:13-cv-05096-EJD

ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

ASSIGN CASE TO COURT’S ADR PROGRAM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JOSE LUIS MADRIZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KING CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:13-cv-05096-EJD 

ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO ASSIGN CASE TO 

COURT’S ADR PROGRAM

Re: Dkt. No. 99

Presently before the court is Defendants County of Monterey, et al.’s (“County of 

Monterey”) Administrative Motion to Assign Case to Court’s ADR Program. See Dkt. No. 99. 

County of Monterey seeks a court order referring this case to the court’s ADR program for the 

purposes of scheduling and conducting a mediation. Id. at 4. 

Given the circumstances, it is appropriate for the parties to participate in an ADR phone 

conference to determine the best course of action. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties 

shall file the form entitled “Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference” within 10 days of the 

date of this Order. After completing the ADR phone conference, the parties shall file a brief 

report informing the court of their course of action. A ruling on the instant motion is DEFERRED 

until the parties inform the court of the results of the ADR phone conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 6, 2015 

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:13-cv-05096-EJD Document 101 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 1