Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00564/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00564-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LYDIA ORDAZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-00564-MCE-KJN 

ORDER

Presently before the Court is a motion by Defendants Bank of America, N.A.; The 

Bank of New York Mellon, fka The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificate 

Holders of CWABS 2004-BC1; and ReconTrust Company, N.A. (“Defendants”) to 

dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Motion”). ECF No. 8. Plaintiff did not file an 

opposition or statement of non-opposition to the Motion.

Pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(c), opposition, if any, to a motion must be filed not 

less than fourteen (14) days prior to the date of the hearing. A responding party who 

has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and file a statement to that 

effect. Id. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion was set for October 2, 2014. Fourteen 

(14) days prior to the hearing was September 18, 2014. 

///

Case 2:14-cv-00564-MCE-KJN Document 15 Filed 10/02/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Because oral argument would not assist the Court, the matter was submitted on 

the briefs pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 230(g), and the October 2, 2014, 

hearing on the Motion was vacated. See ECF No. 14. In light of Plaintiff’s failure to file 

an opposition, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 8, is GRANTED WITH LEAVE 

TO AMEND. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Encore Credit Corporation, which has 

not appeared or challenged the pleadings in this case, are similarly DISMISSED WITH 

LEAVE TO AMEND. See Abagninin v. AMVAC Chem. Corp., 545 F.3d 733, 742-43 (9th 

Cir. 2008).

Plaintiff may file an amended complaint not later than twenty (20) days after the 

date this Order is filed electronically. If no amended complaint is filed within said twenty 

(20) day period, without further notice to the parties, Plaintiff’s claims will be dismissed 

without leave to amend.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 1, 2014

Case 2:14-cv-00564-MCE-KJN Document 15 Filed 10/02/14 Page 2 of 2