Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01839/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01839-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELANTECH DEVICES CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 SYNAPTICS, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 06-01839 CRB

ORDER RE: ELANTECH’S

MOTIONS

Now pending before the Court is Elantech’s motion for partial summary judgment and

Elantech’s motion for a preliminary injunction. In reviewing its chamber’s files and the

electronic docket, the Court has been unable to locate Elantech’s memorandum in support of

summary judgment. While the docket reflects Elantech’s notice of manual filing of such

document, the docket does not reflect that the document was ever filed and the Court does

not have a copy. In addition, Elantech failed to electronically file a redacted version of its

memorandum in support of summary judgment. The parties must electronically file redacted

versions of all documents filed under seal. 

In its motions for summary judgment and for preliminary injunction Elantech admits

that it has not yet moved to amend its Final Infringement Contentions to include all of the

products implementing Type II code. Elantech shall file such motion on or before February

1, 2008. Prior to filing, the parties shall meet and confer in good faith in an attempt to

Case 5:06-cv-01839-PVT Document 232 Filed 01/28/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2006\1839\orderreElantech'smotions.wpd 2

stipulate to the amendments. If the parties cannot agree, and Synaptics insists on opposing

the motion, the motion to amend shall be heard on March 7, 2008. 

In light of above, Elantech’s motions for partial summary judgment and preliminary

injunction shall also be heard on March 7, 2008, together with Synaptics’ motion for

summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2008 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-01839-PVT Document 232 Filed 01/28/08 Page 2 of 2