Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-04989/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-04989-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs RON WILSON

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RON WILSON, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION, SERVICES:HELPING

YOU HELP OTHERS, a California public

benefit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MARIE CALLENDER’S; RICHARD G.

AND DORTHY EHIKIAN; and MARIE

CALLENDER’S PIE SHOPS, INC., 

Defendants. ___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-4989 PJH

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Mutual Settlement Agreement and Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own costs

and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction

over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375

(1994)

(empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement

agreements).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through

their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: November 15, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

 By: /s/ Jennifer L. Steneberg 

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs RON WILSON and

DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

Dated: November 15, 2005 GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP.

By: /s/ Marc B. Koenigsberg 

Kathleen E. Finnerty

Marc B. Koenigsberg

Attorneys for Defendants MARIE

CALLENDER’S PIE SHOPS, INC., RICHARD

G. EHIKIAN and DOROTHY EHIKIAN

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: _____________, 2005

 

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

November 16