Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03076/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03076-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Andrew Rangel, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph M. Arpaio, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV05-3076-PHX-SRB

ORDER

Plaintiff, Andrew Rangel, filed his Civil Rights Complaint on October 4, 2005. On

March 21, 2006, this Court issued its screening order. Plaintiff was advised "that if he failed

to timely comply with every provision of this Order, or any order entered in this matter, this

action will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure."

Plaintiff was also ordered to "complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court

within 20 days of the date of the filing of this Order." Plaintiff has failed to returned the

service packet as ordered in the March 21, 2006. On June 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge

filed his Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed without

prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

Case 2:05-cv-03076-SRB-CRP Document 7 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case without prejudice for failure to

prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 23rd day of August, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03076-SRB-CRP Document 7 Filed 08/24/06 Page 2 of 2