Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-1_09-cv-00379/USCOURTS-almd-1_09-cv-00379-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

KIM RALSTON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:09cv379-MHT

) (WO)

BELL AEROSPACE )

SERVICES, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

On the 2nd day of July, 2010, after this cause had

been presented to a jury, a verdict was returned as

follows: 

Gender-Discrimination Claim

1. Has Kim Ralston proved by a

preponderance of the evidence that her

gender was a motivating factor for the

decision by Bell Aerospace Services,

Inc. to terminate her, even though other

factors may have also motivated the

company?

Yes 

No X 

xxx

Case 1:09-cv-00379-MHT-WC Document 99 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 2
SO SAY WE ALL. 

DONE, this the 2nd day of July, 2010.

/s/ Sheila Steinwinder

FOREPERSON

It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of

the court that judgment is entered in favor of defendant

Bell Aerospace Services, Inc. and against plaintiff Kim

Ralston, with plaintiff Ralston taking nothing by her

complaint.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against

plaintiff Ralston, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this

document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant

to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE, this the 6th day of July, 2010.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00379-MHT-WC Document 99 Filed 07/06/10 Page 2 of 2