Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04525/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04525-39/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP 

(SINGAPORE) PTE LTD.,,

Plaintiff,

v.

ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-04525-EMC 

SECOND ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL

Docket No. 254

Previously, the Court granted in part and deferred in part Defendants’ administrative 

motion to file under seal. See Docket No. 340 (order). The Court deferred in part in order to give 

Avago an opportunity to assert a claim of confidentiality with respect to certain exhibits. Because 

Avago has not asserted a claim of confidentiality, and neither has ASUS or any third party, the 

Court hereby DENIES the request to file the following exhibits under seal: Exhibits 4, 6, 7, and 9. 

ASUS shall publicly file these exhibits within three days of the date of this order. Also, within 

three days of this order, ASUS shall (1) review its motion to see whether portions of that motion 

should now be filed publicly in light of this order and (2) if so, publicly file a copy of the motion 

to reflect such. That filing, of course, may still contain redactions of confidential information to 

the extent that the Court granted the motion to file under seal in its prior order. See Docket No. 

340 (order).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 3, 2016

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-04525-EMC Document 353 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 1