Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-05008/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-05008-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

Case No.15-cv-05008-NC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CORE WIRELESS LICENSING 

S.A.R.L.,

Plaintiff,

v.

APPLE INC,

Defendant.

Case No.15-cv-05008-NC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

PRO HAC VICE REQUEST

Re: Dkt. No. 258

Core Wireless seeks to admit Douglas Lichtman to this Court pro hac vice. The 

Northern District Local Rule 11-3(b) states: 

Unless authorized by an Act of Congress or by an order of the 

assigned judge, an applicant is not eligible for permission to 

practice pro hac vice if the applicant: 

(1) Resides in the State of California; or

(2) Is regularly engaged in the practice of law in the State of 

California. This disqualification shall not be applicable if the 

pro hac vice applicant (i) has been a resident of California for 

less than one year; (ii) has registered with, and completed all 

required applications for admission to, the State Bar of 

California; and

(3) Has officially registered to take or is awaiting his or her 

results from the California State Bar exam. 

Lichtman appears to reside in California, thus Core Wireless must show cause by 

September 1, 2016, why the Court should permit Lichtman to appear pro hac vice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 26, 2016 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:15-cv-05008-NC Document 259 Filed 08/26/16 Page 1 of 1