Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03525/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-03525-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL A. HUNT,

Plaintiff, No.2: 09-cv-3525 KJM GGH P

vs.

D. FIELDS,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On December 19, 2011, defendant D. Fields filed a motion a motion for summary

judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff was previously informed of the requirements

for opposing a motion for summary judgment, see Doc. No. 9, and has in fact filed opposition to

the motion. See Doc. No. 51. However, in light of the recent decision of the Court of Appeals

for the Ninth Circuit in Woods v. Carey, – F.3d –, 2012 WL 2626912 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012), the

court will again inform plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary

judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, as articulated in Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957

(9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988).

 A motion for summary judgment made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 is a request

for an order for judgment in favor of the defendant without trial. A defendant’s motion for

1

Case 2:09-cv-03525-KJM-AC Document 55 Filed 07/12/12 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendant contends are not reasonably subject

to dispute and that entitle the defendant to judgment. To oppose a motion for summary

judgment, plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may do this in one or more of

the following ways. Plaintiff may rely on plaintiff’s statements made under penalty of perjury in

the complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated

and plaintiff specifies those parts of the complaint on which plaintiff relies. Plaintiff may serve

and file one or more affidavits or declarations setting forth the facts that plaintiff believes prove

plaintiff’s claims; the person who signs an affidavit or declaration must have personal

knowledge of the facts stated. Plaintiff may rely on written records, but plaintiff must prove that

the records are what plaintiff asserts they are. Plaintiff may rely on all or any part of the

transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions obtained in this

proceeding. If plaintiff fails to contradict the defendant’s evidence with counter-affidavits or

other admissible evidence, the court may accept defendant’s evidence as true and grant the

motion. If there is some good reason why such facts are not available to plaintiff when required

to oppose a motion for summary judgment, the court will consider a request to postpone

consideration of the defendant’s motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). If plaintiff does not serve

and file a written opposition to the motion, or a request to postpone consideration of the motion,

the court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of opposition to the defendant’s motion. See

L.R. 230(l). If the court grants the motion for summary judgment, whether opposed or

unopposed, judgment will be entered for the defendant without a trial and the case will be closed

as to that defendant. Unsigned affidavits or declarations will be stricken, and affidavits or

declarations not signed under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value.

In light of this notice, plaintiff may wish to supplement his previously-filed

opposition, though he is not required to do so. Plaintiff will be provided with 21 days within

which to file any additional submissions, if he chooses to do so. No extensions will be provided. 

/////

2

Case 2:09-cv-03525-KJM-AC Document 55 Filed 07/12/12 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have 21 days from

the filing date of this order to supplement his opposition, if he chooses to do so. No extensions

shall be provided.

DATED: July 11, 2012

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

ggh:rb

hunt3525.rand

3

Case 2:09-cv-03525-KJM-AC Document 55 Filed 07/12/12 Page 3 of 3