Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06463/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06463-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMUEL BELTRAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DR. J. NEUBARTH, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-06463-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 36)

ORDER GRANTING UNENUMERATED

RULE 12(b) MOTION TO DISMISS

(Doc. 18)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, Samuel Beltran (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 25, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and

Recommendation herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On February 23, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion to extend

time. On February 25, 2005, the court granted plaintiff an

additional thirty (30) days within which to respond. To date,

plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

Report and Recommendation.

Case 1:03-cv-06463-OWW -LJO Document 41 Filed 04/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Report and Recommendation to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed January 25, 2005,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss,

filed August 16, 2004, is GRANTED; and,

3. This action is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06463-OWW -LJO Document 41 Filed 04/21/05 Page 2 of 2