Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00774/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00774-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Grover A. Perrigue III #067114

A Law Corporation

221 East Walnut Street, Suite 155

Pasadena, California 91101-1554

Phone No.: (626) 449-1732; Fax No.: (626) 564-0817

Lead Counsel:

Lawrence J. Roberts Fl. Bar No. 343218

Lawrence J. Roberts & Associates, P.A.

249 Catalonia Avenue

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Phone: 305-441-7882 Fax: 305-441-7883

Attorneys for Plaintiff Estes Express Lines

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Fresno Division

ESTES EXPRESS LINES, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

GORDON PURSLOW,

Defendant.

________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: 1:09-CV-00774-OWW-GSA

STIPULATION REQUESTING

VACATION OF SCHEDULING

ORDER AND THE SETTING OF

A FURTHER SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE AND ORDER

Honorable Oliver W. Wanger

COURTROOM No: 3

TO: THE HONORABLE OLIVER W. WANGER, JUDGE UNITED STATES

DISTRICT COURT

FACTS:

Counsel substituted out leaving Mr. Purslow to represent himself while residing

in Southern Oregon with no present, established way to operate in the territory of the

Eastern District Court presiding over matters filed in Fresno on such short notice.

There is pending discovery, such as a scheduled deposition, within the discovery

cutoff that cannot be accommodated by Mr. Purslow in the absence of counsel who has

now substituted out. So that Defendant will have a fair opportunity to defend himself,

___________________________________________________________________________

Stipulation and Order Vacating and Resetting Scheduling Order 1

Case 1:09-cv-00774-OWW -GSA Document 14 Filed 03/18/10 Page 1 of 2
 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff agrees that Defendant needs more time, probably a three months’ “reset” on

all dates, as the court may direct at a further scheduling conference.

Therefore, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate to and request that the court vacate

the present schedule and hold a hearing to reschedule to accommodate the changed

circumstances set forth above.

Dated: 3-16-2010 Grover A. Perrigue III

A law Corporation

Lawrence J. Roberts & Associates, P.A.

Grover A. Perrigue III (orig. filed pdf)

By: ______________________________

Grover A. Perrigue III

Lawrence J. Roberts

Attorneys for Defendant

Estes Express Lines

Dated: 3-16-2010

Gordon Purslow (orig. filed pdf)

By: ______________________________

Gordon Purslow, in propria persona

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE SCHEDULING ORDER IS VACATED AND A 

FURTHER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE WILL BE SCHEDULED TO JULY 9, 2010 @

8:15AM BEFORE JUDGE WANGER IN COURTROOM 3 ON THE 7 FLOOR. TH

IT IS SO ORDERED:

DATED: 3/18/2010_________ _/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER______________

 JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

___________________________________________________________________________

Stipulation and Order Vacating and Resetting Scheduling Order 2

Case 1:09-cv-00774-OWW -GSA Document 14 Filed 03/18/10 Page 2 of 2