Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04964/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04964-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CURTIS,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

 TREASURY DEPARTMENT ET AL,

Defendant. /

No. C05-04964 MJJ

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

AND MOTION FOR A CONFERENCE

CALL

Before the Court are three motions: Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment in Opposition to

Dismissal (“Motion for Default Judgment I”), Plaintiff’s Motion for a Conference Call, and

Plaintiff’s Motion and Order to Reinstate for Proper Default Judgment (“Motion for Default

Judgment II”). (Docket Nos. 87, 88.) On September 27, 2007, the Court granted Defendant’s

Motion to Dismiss. (Docket No. 85.) That same day the Court entered judgment against Plaintiff. 

(Docket No. 86.) Plaintiff filed the Motion for Default Judgment I and Motion for Conference Call

on October 1, 2007. Plaintiff filed the Motion for Default Judgment II on October 4, 2007. 

Plaintiff’s Motions are procedurally improper and untimely. The Court therefore DENIES all three

of Plaintiff’s Motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 2, 2007 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-04964-MMC Document 90 Filed 11/06/07 Page 1 of 1