Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01428/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01428-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LATASHA NICOLE CREER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-1428 JAM DB PS

ORDER

This action came before the court on October 7, 2016, for hearing of plaintiff’s motion to 

compel compliance and motion for sanctions. Attorney Kelly Trujillo appeared on behalf of the 

defendants and plaintiff Latasha Creer appeared on her own behalf. 

Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the 

reasons set forth on the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 39) is denied; 

2. Plaintiff’s motion to compel compliance (ECF No. 38) is granted;

3. Defendants shall produce to plaintiff transcripts of the interviews at issue on or before 

November 9, 20161

; and

 1

 Although the court indicated at the October 7, 2016 hearing that defendants would be granted 

six weeks to produce responsive documents, the discovery cutoff in this action is November 9, 

2016, and the undersigned cannot order production past that date. However, at the October 7, 

2016 hearing plaintiff indicated a willingness to continue the discovery deadline. Accordingly, if 

Case 2:14-cv-01428-JAM-DB Document 46 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. Defendants shall redact the names of any Vallejo Police Department Officers and 

replace those names with number identifiers. 

DATED: October 7, 2016 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DLB:6

DLB1\orders.pro se\creer1428.oah.100716.ord

 

defendants require additional time to comply with the court’s order, defendants should consider 

reaching a stipulation with plaintiff to extend the discovery deadline or filing a request for such 

an extension. 

Case 2:14-cv-01428-JAM-DB Document 46 Filed 10/11/16 Page 2 of 2