Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05313/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05313-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

TIMOTHY BUFORD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

M.T.A. HAGGIE, et al., )

) 

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

CV F- 02-5313 OWW DLB P 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

OF COURT’S ORDER DENYING

MOTION TO TAKE TELEPHONIC

DEPOSITION

[DOC # 106]

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. On March 21, 2006, this court denied plaintiff’s motion for

leave to take the deposition of a non party witness by telephone. On April 3, 2006, plaintiff filed a

motion to reconsider the court’s order. Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration is HEREBY DENIED. 

As plaintiff was previously advised, the Court has not yet opened discovery in this action and

plaintiff has failed to provide “new or different facts or circumstances claimed to exist which did not

exist or were not shown upon such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the motion.” Local

Rule 78-230(k)(3). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 27, 2006 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3c0hj8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05313-OWW -DLB Document 110 Filed 04/27/06 Page 1 of 1