Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-01235/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-01235-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMUNDO A. JAIME,

Petitioner, 

v.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, et al., 

Respondents.

 /

Civ-S-00-1235 DFL CMK P

O R D E R

Petitioner has filed a notice of appeal of this court’s

September 26, 2005 denial of his application for a writ of habeas

corpus. Before petitioner may appeal this decision, a

certificate of appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c);

Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 a certificate of appealability is

warranted only if the case presents a “substantial question,”

i.e., one that is “‘debatable among jurists of reason,’” could be

resolved differently by a different court, or is “‘adequate to

Case 2:00-cv-01235-DFL -CMK Document 35 Filed 12/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

deserve encouragement to proceed further.’” Jennings v. Woodford,

290 F.3d 1006, 1010 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Barefoot v. Estelle,

463 U.S. 880, 893 (1983)). 

For the reasons set forth in the September 26, 2005 order

denying defendant’s petition for habeas corpus, defendant has not

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right. Accordingly, petitioner’s application for a certificate

of appealability is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 12/19/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:00-cv-01235-DFL -CMK Document 35 Filed 12/20/06 Page 2 of 2