Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01401/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-01401-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISAIAH J. PETILLO, 

Plaintiff,

v.

REYNALDO JASSO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:21-cv-01401-JLT-SAB (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

TO SERVE A COPY OF MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON 

DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 41)

Plaintiff Isaiah J. Petillo is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983.

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion requesting the Court to serve a copy of 

his motion for summary judgment which was filed on November 10, 2022. Plaintiff’s request 

shall be denied. 

As stated in the Court’s September 20, 2021 first informational order, “[o]nce an attorney 

for a defendant appears in a pro se plaintiff's civil rights action (by filing an answer, a motion to 

dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, etc.), that attorney's office will receive notice of all 

filings through the Court's electronic filing system (ECM/ECF). A pro se plaintiff need not serve 

documents on 10 counsel for a defendant; the date of the electronic Notice from ECM/ECF is the 

date of service. Local 11 Rule 135(a).” Indeed, a review of the Court’s record reflects that 

Defendants filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on November 28, 

///

Case 1:21-cv-01401-SAB Document 42 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2022. (ECF No. 39.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for the Court to serve his motion for 

summary judgment on Defendants is denied as unnecessary .

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 2, 2022 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:21-cv-01401-SAB Document 42 Filed 12/02/22 Page 2 of 2