Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05523/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05523-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM BOWLER, JR.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HOME DEPOT USA INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

Case No. C-09-5523 JCS

ORDER FOR JOINT STATEMENT OF

UNDISPUTED FACTS

Defendant has filed a motion for partial summary judgment, which is set for hearing on

January 21, 2011. The Court’s Standing Order on Motions for Summary Judgment provides as

follows:

The parties shall file a joint statement of undisputed facts. If the parties are unable to reach

complete agreement after meeting and conferring, they shall file a joint statement of the

undisputed facts about which they do agree. Separate statements of undisputed facts shall not

be filed and will not be considered by the Court.

Civil Standing Orders for Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero, Revised 11/03/08, ¶ 17. No joint

statement of undisputed facts has been filed in support of the pending summary judgment motion. 

Instead, Defendant and Plaintiff have filed separate statements. These separate statements will not

be considered by the Court.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint statement of undisputed facts in

compliance with the Court’s Standing Order by Friday, January 7, 2011. The parties are cautioned

that any party who objects to a proposed fact without a reasonable basis for doing so may 

Case 3:09-cv-05523-JCS Document 81 Filed 01/05/11 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

be subject to sanctions. Similarly, the Court may deem any proposed fact to which Plaintiff does not

respond to be undisputed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2011

___________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05523-JCS Document 81 Filed 01/05/11 Page 2 of 2