Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01613/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01613-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:14-CV-01613-THE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

William C. McNeill, III, (SBN 64392)

Marsha J. Chien, (SBN 275238)

THE LEGAL AID SOCIETYEMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER

180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 864-8848

Facsimile: (415) 593-0096

Email: wmcneill@las-elc.org

Email: mchien@las-elc.org

Matthew C. Kane (SBN 171829)

Michael D. Mandel (SBN 216934)

Regina A. Musolino (SBN 198872)

Sean M. Sullivan (SBN 286368)

MCGUIREWOODS LLP

1800 Century Park East, 8th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067-1501

Telephone: (310) 315-8200

Facsimile: (310) 315-8210

Email: mkane@mcguirewoods.com

Email: mmandel@mcguirewoods.com

Email: rmusolino@mcguirewoods.com

Email: ssullivan@mcguirewoods.com

Attorneys for Defendant BANK OF 

AMERICA CORPORATION

James M. Finberg (SBN 114850)

Eve H. Cervantez (SBN 164709)

Connie K. Chan (SBN 284230)

ALTSHULER BERZON LLP

177 Post Street, Suite 300

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (415) 421-7151

Facsimile: (415) 362-8064

Email: jfinberg@altber.com

Email: ecervantez@altber.com

Email: cchan@altber.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff JANE DOE, on behalf 

of herself and other similarly situated.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION.

Defendant

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:14-CV-01613 THE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING

HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R.

CIV. P. 12(B)(7); DECLARATION OF

CONNIE K. CHAN IN SUPPORT

THEREOF

Civ. L.R. 6-2 and 7-12

Date: n/a

Time: n/a

Courtroom: 12

Judge: Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:14-cv-01613-TEH Document 59 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 6
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:14-CV-01613-THE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Jane Doe (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Bank of America Corporation (“Defendant”), 

herein referred to collectively as the “Parties,” by and through their respective attorneys of record, 

hereby stipulate pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 as follows:

WHEREAS, on June 22, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint 

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(7), noticed for hearing on July 27, 2015;

WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss 

is due July 6, 2015, and Defendant’s reply is due July 13, 2015;

WHEREAS, as set forth in the supporting Declaration of Connie K. Chan, Plaintiff is unable to 

prepare her opposition by July 6, 2015 due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s prior conflicting work and travel 

commitments; and

WHEREAS, the Parties do not anticipate that enlarging the briefing schedule and continuing the 

hearing on Defendant’s motion to dismiss will affect any other case scheduling deadlines currently set; 

HENCE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the Parties have conferred and hereby stipulate to the 

following amended briefing and hearing schedule, subject to the Court’s approval:

1. Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(7) shall be 

due July 21, 2015;

2. Defendant’s reply shall be due August 10, 2015;

3. A hearing on Defendant’s motion shall be set for August 24, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon 

thereafter as the Court is available.

DATED: July 2, 2015 By: __/s/ Connie K. Chan________________________

The LEGAL AID SOCIETY-EMPLOYMENT 

LAW CENTER

William C. McNeill, III

Marsha J. Chien

180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 864 8848

Facsimile: (415) 593-0096

wmcneill@las-elc.org

mchien@las-elc.org

Case 3:14-cv-01613-TEH Document 59 Filed 07/02/15 Page 2 of 6
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:14-CV-01613-THE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ALTSHULER BERZON LLP

James M. Finberg

Eve H. Cervantez

Connie K. Chan

177 Post Street, Suite 300

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (415) 421-7151

Facsimile: (415) 362-8064

jfinberg@altber.com

ecervantez@altber.com

cchan@altber.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe, on behalf of 

herself and others similarly situated

DATED: July 2, 2015 By: __/s/ Regina A. Musolino____________________

MCGUIRE WOODS LLP

Matthew C. Kane

Michael D. Mandel

Regina A. Musolino

Sean M. Sullivan

1800 Century Park East, 8th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067-1501

Telephone: (310) 315-8200

Facsimile: (310) 315-8210

mkane@mcguirewoods.com

mmandel@mcguirewoods.com

rmusolino@mcguirewoods.com

ssullivan@mcguirewoods.com

Attorneys for Defendant Bank of America 

Corporation

Case 3:14-cv-01613-TEH Document 59 Filed 07/02/15 Page 3 of 6
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:14-CV-01613-THE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF CONNIE K. CHAN IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION TO MODIFY 

BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

I, Connie K. Chan, declare as follows:

1. I am a member in good standing of the bar of the State of California and am one of the 

counsel of record for Plaintiff in the above-captioned case. I make this declaration in support of the 

parties’ stipulated request to extend the briefing and hearing schedule on Defendant’s pending motion to 

dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(7). The facts set forth in this declaration I know to be true of my own 

personal knowledge, except as those matters which are alleged on information and belief, and as to those 

matters I believe them to be true. I could and would competently testify as to all such matters, if called 

upon to do so.

2. Following an initial case management conference held on August 25, 2014, the Court 

issued a case scheduling order setting, among other dates, a fact discovery cutoff of February 1, 2016, a 

February 22, 2016 deadline to file dispositive motions, and a May 17, 2016 trial date.

3. On February 17, 2015, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation made in light of ongoing 

mediation efforts, the Court issued an order extending the deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion for class 

certification from August 3, 2015 to September 18, 2015.

4. There have been no other previous time modifications in this case.

5. Under Civil Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(7), filed June 22, 2015, is due July 6, 2015.

6. Plaintiff’s counsel Jim Finberg has been out of the country with very limited e-mail 

access since before Defendant’s motion to dismiss was filed, and will not return to the office until July 

6, 2015.

7. Plaintiff’s counsel Marsha Chien is currently out of town for her wedding and 

honeymoon and will not return to the office until July 13, 2015.

8. I was out of the office on a previously scheduled trip June 26, 2015 and will be out of 

town for a previously scheduled trip from July 2, 2015 through July 6, 2015.

Case 3:14-cv-01613-TEH Document 59 Filed 07/02/15 Page 4 of 6
4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:14-CV-01613-THE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9. Plaintiff’s counsel Eve Cervantez will be out of town for a previously scheduled vacation 

from July 6, 2015 through July 10, 2015.

10. Due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s various previously scheduled commitments, including other 

prior work obligations, Plaintiff is unable to file her opposition by July 6, 2015. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s 

counsel approached Defendant’s counsel about stipulating to extend Plaintiff’s time to respond to 

Defendant’s motion to dismiss, to which Defendant’s counsel agreed.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my 

knowledge. Executed at San Francisco, California, on July 2, 2015.

by: /s/ Connie K. Chan_________

Connie K. Chan

Case 3:14-cv-01613-TEH Document 59 Filed 07/02/15 Page 5 of 6
5

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

Case No. 3:14-CV-01613-THE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROPOSED ORDER

Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, the Court hereby orders as 

follows:

Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(7) [Dkt. 55] 

is due July 21, 2015;

Defendant’s reply is due August 10, 2015; and

A hearing on Defendant’s motion is continued from July 27, 2015 to August 24, 2015 at 10:00 

a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

Hon. Thelton E. Henderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-01613-TEH Document 59 Filed 07/02/15 Page 6 of 6