Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-04464/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-04464-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEXANDER WARREN,

Plaintiff,

v.

GEORGE MARCUS,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-04464-DMR 

ORDER RE PARTIES' PROPOSED 

JURY INSTRUCTIONS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 82, 87

The court has received the parties’ proposed jury instructions. [Docket Nos. 82, 87.] In 

the Amended Case Management and Pretrial Order (Docket No. 69), the court ordered the parties 

to submit proposed jury instructions jointly. Any instructions on which the parties could not 

agree were to be submitted separately. It appears that the parties’ individual proposals contain 

some overlapping instructions. Additionally, the parties each submitted Model Ninth Circuit Jury 

Instruction No. 1.2 (Claims and Defenses) but did not submit the text of the proposed case-specific 

instruction. Therefore, the court orders the parties to meet and confer regarding the proposed jury 

instructions. By no later than April 23, 2015, the parties shall jointly submit the jury instructions 

on which the parties agree, and shall separately re-file those instructions on which the parties do 

not agree.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 21, 2015

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:13-cv-04464-DMR Document 104 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 1