Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01767/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-01767-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

AMD’SRESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

C05-01767 MMC

MARK E. MILLER (S.B. #130200) markmiller@omm.com

LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) lsimmons@omm.com

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305

Telephone: (415) 984-8700

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701

Attorneys for Defendant

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Computer Cache Coherency Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-01767 MMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendant Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

(“AMD”) and Plaintiff Computer Cache Coherency Corporation (“CCCC”) as follows:

WHEREAS, CCCC filed its Complaint against AMD on April 28, 2005, and served AMD 

on May 5, 2005;

WHEREAS, AMD is currently scheduled to respond to CCCC’s Complaint by June 24,

2005;

WHEREAS, AMD and CCCC previously agreed to a thirty-day extension to move or

plead in response to CCCC’s Complaint;

WHEREAS, AMD and CCCC have agreed to an additional fourteen-day extension for 

AMD to move or otherwise plead in response to CCCC’s Complaint;

Case 5:05-cv-01767-RMW Document 16 Filed 06/22/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

AMD’SRESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

C05-01767 MMC

-2-

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, the parties hereby stipulate as 

follows:

Defendant Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. shall answer or otherwise respond to Computer 

Cache Coherency Corporation’s Complaint on or before July 8, 2005.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 21, 2005 MARK E. MILLER

LUANN L. SIMMONS

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Mark E. Miller

Mark E. Miller

Attorneys for Defendant

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Dated: June 21, 2005 RODERICK G. DORMAN

LAWRENCE M. HADLEY

HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP

By: /s/ Lawrence M. Hadley

Lawrence M. Hadley

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Computer Cache Coherency Corporation

Case 5:05-cv-01767-RMW Document 16 Filed 06/22/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

AMD’SRESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

C05-01767 MMC

-3-

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has 

been obtained from Lawrence M. Hadley.

Dated: June 21, 2005 MARK E. MILLER

LUANN L. SIMMONS

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Mark E. Miller

Mark E. Miller

Attorneys for Defendant

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

United States District Judge

SF1:591316.1

June 21, 2005

Case 5:05-cv-01767-RMW Document 16 Filed 06/22/05 Page 3 of 3