Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04374/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04374-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CELERITY, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

 v.

ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS

AND SERVICE, INC.

Defendant/Counterclaimant

and

ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC.,

Defendant /

No. 05-4374 MMC 

(consolidated with C-05-3560 MMC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE

DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL;

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

Before the Court is plaintiff’s administrative motion, filed August 3, 2006, to file under

seal the Declaration of Keith Slenkovich in Support of Plaintiff Celerity, Inc.’s Reply to

Defendants’ Claim Construction Statement. Plaintiff represents that material referenced in

and attached to said declaration has been designated by defendants as confidential.

Under the Local Rules of this District, where a party seeks to file under seal any

material designated as confidential by another party, the submitting party must file a motion

for a sealing order. See Civil L.R. 79-5(d). “Within five days thereafter, the designating

party must file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the designated

information is sealable, and must lodge and serve a narrowly tailored proposed sealing

Case 3:05-cv-04374-MMC Document 58 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

order, or must withdraw the designation of confidentiality.” Id. “If the designating party

does not file its responsive declaration as required by this subsection, the document or

proposed filing will be made part of the public record.” Id.

Here, the designating parties, defendants, have not filed a responsive declaration

within the time provided under Civil Local Rule 79-5(d).

Accordingly, plaintiff’s administrative motion is hereby DENIED, and the Clerk of the

Court is hereby DIRECTED to file in the public record the Declaration of Keith Slenkovich in

Support of Plaintiff Celerity, Inc.’s Reply to Defendants’ Claim Construction Statement. See

Civil L.R. 79-5(d).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 10, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-04374-MMC Document 58 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 2