Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02562/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02562-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

Case No. C-07-02562 RMW 

#1319432 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ANDREW H. BAKER, SBN 104197 

abaker@beesontayer.com 

BEESON, TAYER & BODINE, APC. 

1404 Franklin Street, Suite 500 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 625-9700 

Facsimile: (510) 625-8275 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TEAMSTERS LOCAL 665 

ROBERT A. DOLINKO, SBN 076256 

radolinko@thelen.com 

JOHN C. CORCORAN, SBN 178916 

jccorcoran@thelen.com 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 371-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 371-1211 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE HERTZ CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AT SAN JOSE 

TEAMSTERS AUTOMOTIVE 

EMPLOYEES, LOCAL NO. 665, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE HERTZ CORPORATION, RENT-ACAR DIVISION, successor to HERTZ 

TRANSPORTING, INC. 

 Defendant. 

Case No. C-07-02562 RMW 

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER RE: ADR PROCESS 

*E-FILED - 8/20/07*

Case 5:07-cv-02562-RMW Document 12 Filed 08/20/07 Page 1 of 2
Case No. C-07-02562 RMW 

#1319432 

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5: 

 This case involves alleged violations of a collective bargaining agreement between Hertz 

and the Teamsters which contains a mediation procedure. Pursuant to that procedure, some or all 

of the disputes alleged in the complaint were submitted to mediation before Ruth Carpenter of 

the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. Having already attempted mediation under the 

procedure set forth in the collective bargaining agreement, the parties do not believe that a 

resubmission to mediation will be fruitful. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the 

Court decline to order any further participation in ADR 

Dated: August 8, 2007 

Dated: August 8, 2007 

By: /s/ Andrew H. Baker, Esq._____

BEESON, TAYER & BODINE, APC. 

By: ANDREW H. BAKER 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

TEAMSTERS LOCAL 665 

By: /s/ Robert A. Dolinko, Esq._____

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER LLP 

By: ROBERT A. DOLINKO 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE HERTZ CORPORATION 

ORDER

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________________ ____________________________________ 

 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

United States District Judge 

8/20/07

Case 5:07-cv-02562-RMW Document 12 Filed 08/20/07 Page 2 of 2