Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01396/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01396-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL P. CASHMAN, et al., No. 2:06-cv-1396-MCE-GGH-P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

JOSEPH S. WARCHOL, II

Respondent.

 /

Daniel P. Cashman, a non-attorney, filed this Habeas Corpus

Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, purportedly on behalf of a

minor identified as B.W. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and

Local General Order No. 262.

On August 18, 2006, the magistrate judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which

contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:06-cv-01396-MCE -GGH Document 13 Filed 10/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Petitioner has filed Objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 18, 2006,

are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed.

DATED: October 12, 2006

_________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:06-cv-01396-MCE -GGH Document 13 Filed 10/13/06 Page 2 of 2