Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-02857/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-02857-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1365 Environmental Matters

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Christopher A. Sproul (Bar No. 126398)

Jodene L. Isaacs (Bar No. 226895)

Environmental Advocates

5135 Anza Street

San Francisco, California 94121

Telephone (415) 533-3376

Facsimile: (415) 358-5695

Email: csproul@enviroadvocates.com

Email: jisaacs@ enviroadvocates.com

Michael A. Costa (Bar No. 219416)

3848 Sacramento St. #2

San Francisco, CA 94118

Telephone: (415) 342-0042

Email: mike@ocefoundation.org

OUR CHILDREN 'S EARTH FOUNDATION and

ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OUR CHILDREN 'S EARTH FOUNDATION, 

non-profit corporation, and ECOLOGICAL 

RIGHTS FOUNDATION, a non-profit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY, BOB PERCIASEPE, Acting 

Administrator, JARED BLUMENTHAL, Regional 

Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region 9, NATIONAL MARINE 

FISHERIES SERVICE, REBECCA BLANK, as 

Acting Secretary of Commerce, RODNEY 

MCINNIS, as Regional Administrator of the 

National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest 

Region, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE 

INTERIOR, KEN SALAZAR, as Secretary of the 

Department of the Interior, REN LOHOEFENER 

as Regional Administrator of the United States Fish 

and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region,

Defendants.

Civil Case No.: 4:13-cv-2857-JSW-KAW

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ 

OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS’ 

REPLY EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF 

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR DE 

NOVO DETERMINATION OF 

DISPOSITIVE MATTER REFERRED TO 

A MAGISTRATE JUDGE

________________________________

Judge: Jeffrey S. White

Case 4:13-cv-02857-JSW Document 97 Filed 03/08/16 Page 1 of 2
Proposed Order on Plaintiffs' Objection to Defendants’ Reply Evidence

CIV. NO.: 4:13-CV-2857-JSW-KAW Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered Plaintiffs’ OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE, Exhibit 1 to DEFENDANTS’ 

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR DE NOVO DETERMINATION OF 

DISPOSITIVE MATTER REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE (“Reply Motion”) (Dkt. 95-1) is hereby 

stricken from the Record. 

[Alternatively] Having considered Plaintiffs OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE above, Plaintiffs are 

hereby granted a Surreply to address Defendants’ submission of new evidence in conjunction with their 

Reply Motion. Plaintiffs shall have ___ days to submit a __ page surreply that addresses Defendants’ 

newly submitted evidence.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:________________ ______________________________

HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE

United States District Judge 

Case 4:13-cv-02857-JSW Document 97 Filed 03/08/16 Page 2 of 2