Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00156/USCOURTS-azd-2_12-cv-00156-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The Court takes judicial notice of the Cancellation because it contains “matters of

public record outside the pleadings.” Mack v. S. Bay Beer Distribs., Inc., 798 F.2d 1279,

1282 (9th Cir. 1986), overruled on other grounds by Astoria Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n. v.

Solimino, 501 U.S. 104 (1991).

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Demir Zoroglu and Tuzin G. Zoroglu, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Wells Fargo Bank, NA; First American

Title Insurance Company, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-12-156-PHX-GMS

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration. (Doc. 9). Plaintiffs

had sought a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) preventing a scheduled Trustee’s sale

of their property, which the Court had previously denied. (Doc. 7). The Court requested

responses from Defendants to the Motion for Reconsideration, and in responding, Defendant

Wells Fargo Bank noted that the Trustee’s sale had been cancelled on February 2, and

included a Notice of Trustee’s sale with its response. (Doc. 14, Ex. C).1

 Since the sale has

been cancelled, the motion for a TRO is moot, and the Motion for Reconsideration is denied.

Case 2:12-cv-00156-GMS Document 18 Filed 02/07/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration (Doc.

9) is denied.

DATED this 7th day of February, 2012.

Case 2:12-cv-00156-GMS Document 18 Filed 02/07/12 Page 2 of 2