Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01312/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01312-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1312

KENNETH A. WHITE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LEROY SCOTT OWENS, VP, Old Republic National Title 

Insurance; CHAGRIN VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW AGENCY; GENERAL 

TITLE & TRUST COMPANY; DOUGLAS KING, Esq.; STEPHEN D. 

STEINOUR, CEO, Chairman, President, Huntington National 

Bank; ROGER CASALE, VP, Sky Bank (bought by Huntington Nat’l 

Bank in 2007); RYAN HOWARD, Mortgage Loan Originator, Sky 

Bank (bought by Huntington Nat’l Bank in 2007); ROBERT 

ROSPLOCK, Esq.; NANCY LUXENBERG; MONICA E. RUSSELL, Attorney 

at Law; DANIEL A. FRIEDLANDER; ROBERT H. YOUNG, Esq.; 

HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK; ONE THROUGH TWENTY JOHN & JANE 

DOES; OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE, 400 Second 

Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401, and; OLD 

REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE; TITLE HOLDINGS, 

LTD/CHARGIN VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW AGENCY; SKY 

BANK/HUNTINGTON NAT’L BANK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior 

District Judge. (1:12-cv-07965)

Submitted: September 30, 2015 Decided: October 6, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 15-1312 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/06/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth A. White, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1312 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/06/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth A. White, a federal inmate, appeals the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012),

White’s second amended complaint filed in his civil action. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. White v. Owens, No. 1:12-cv-07965 (S.D. W. Va. March 12, 

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-1312 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/06/2015 Pg: 3 of 3