Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06425/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06425-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JIMMY MAGEE, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

WIMBISH, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-06425-REC-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 16),

DISMISSING ACTION AND

DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff, Jimmy Magee (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On March 10, 2006, the Court issued an Order dismissing the

Complaint with leave to amend as it did not state claims on which

relief could be granted. Plaintiff, however, failed to file an

Amended Complaint. Thus, on April 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge

filed Findings and Recommendations which were served on plaintiff

and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to

the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty

(20) days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the

Case 1:04-cv-06425-REC -SMS Document 17 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 19, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Complaint, and therefore this action, is DISMISSED

pursuant to Local Rule 11-110, based on plaintiff’s failure to

obey the court’s order of March 10, 2006, and for failure to

state a claim on which relief can be granted;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment

for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 26, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06425-REC -SMS Document 17 Filed 05/26/06 Page 2 of 2