Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01933/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-01933-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LINDA C. REED, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A., et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-01933-JSW 

ORDER HOLDING IN ABEYANCE 

MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY 

RESTRAINING ORDER AND SETTING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION 

TO DISMISS 

Re: Docket Nos. 6, 11 

On May 4, 2016, the parties appeared before this Court for a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion 

for a temporary restraining order. During the hearing, Defendants represented, through counsel, 

that they would be willing to postpone the Trustee’s Sale scheduled for May 9, 2016 to June 6, 

2016, so that the Court could consider their motion under the current procedural posture of the 

case. Plaintiff, through counsel, stated that she would be willing to allow the Court to hold her 

motion for a temporary restraining order in abeyance during that time. 

At the hearing, the Court exhorted, but did not require, the parties to reach an agreement 

about an interim payment during this time. The Court reiterates that this Order is based on the 

parties representations that Defendants will be willing to postpone the Trustee’s Sale and 

Plaintiff’s representation that she is willing to hold the motion for a temporary restraining order in 

abeyance. This Order is not conditioned upon the parties reaching an agreement on an interim 

payment. 

Accordingly, pursuant to the representations of counsel, the Court HOLDS IN 

ABEYANCE Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order. The Court set a hearing on 

Case 4:16-cv-01933-JSW Document 23 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

De

to d

res

for

Da

 

1

 

ma

We

efendants’ m

dismiss is du

The Co

straining ord

r disposition 

IT IS S

ated: May 4, 

 

Defend

ay incorporat

estern Progre

motion to dism

ue on May 1

ourt shall con

er at the hea

without oral

SO ORDER

2016 

 

dants will rete by referen

essive as tru

miss for June

3, 2016, and

nsider both th

aring on June

l argument, 

RED. 

 

-notice that h

nce into their

ustee. 

2

e 3, 2016, at

d Defendants

he motion to

e 3, 2016. If

it shall notif

hearing by cl

r prior motio

t 9:00 a.m.1

s’ reply shal

o dismiss and

f the Court fi

fy the parties

JE

Un

lose of busin

on the argum

Plaintiff’s o

ll be due on M

d the motion

finds either m

s in advance

EFFREY S. W

nited States D

ness today. W

ment regardin

opposition to

May 20, 201

n for a tempo

motion, or bo

 of the heari

WHITE 

District Judg

With Plainti

ng the substi

o the motion 

16. 

orary 

oth, suitable 

ing date. 

ge 

iff’s consent

itution of , 

Case 4:16-cv-01933-JSW Document 23 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 2