Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00290/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00290-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Durrell A. Puckett is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 31, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 

Recommendation which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that 

objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty days. After receiving an 

extension of time, Plaintiff filed objections on February 25, 2016. (ECF No. 37.) The court has 

reviewed Plaintiff’s objections and attached documents and notes that they are not responsive to the 

issue raised in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

DURRELL A. PUCKETT,

 Plaintiff,

v.

K. BRANDON,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00290-AWI-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE 

RELIEF

[ECF Nos. 32, 33]

Case 1:14-cv-00290-SAB Document 45 Filed 03/25/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed on December 31, 2015, is adopted in full; 

and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 25, 2016 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00290-SAB Document 45 Filed 03/25/16 Page 2 of 2