Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05745/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05745-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION ON 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PENDING MOTIONS - CASE NO. CV-09-5745 (CRB) 

KENNETH L. WILTON (SBN 126557) 

E-Mail: kwilton@seyfarth.com 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 

Los Angeles, California 90067-3021 

Telephone: (310) 277-7200 

Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 

ROBIN M. CLEARY (SBN 192489) 

E-mail: rcleary@seyfarth.com 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

Attorneys for Defendants 

VISION SOLUTIONS, INC. and WILLIAM HAMMOND 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MAXIMUM AVAILABILITY LIMITED, a 

New Zealand limited liability company, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VISION SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; WILLIAM HAMMOND, an 

Individual, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 

Case No. Case No. CV-09-5745 (CRB) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PENDING 

MOTIONS 

Date: February 19, 2010 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom 8 

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

Complaint Filed: December 7, 2009 

Case 3:09-cv-05745-CRB Document 36 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION ON 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PENDING MOTIONS - CASE NO. CV-09-5745 (CRB)

ORDER

The Court, having read and reviewed the Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule On 

Pending Motions jointly submitted by the parties, rules as follows: 

1. The Reply brief of Defendant Vision Solutions, Inc. (“Vision”) on its motion to 

transfer venue shall be filed on or before February 9, 2010; 

2. The Reply brief of Defendant William Hammond (“Hammond”) on his motion to 

dismiss shall be filed on or before February 9, 2010; 

3. The Amended Opposition of Vision to the motion for preliminary injunction filed 

by Plaintiff Maximum Availability Limited (“Maximum”) shall be filed on or before February 9, 

2010; and 

4. The Reply brief of Maximum in support of its motion for preliminary injunction 

shall be filed on or before February 15, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________, 2010 

 The Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Judge 

February 05

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-05745-CRB Document 36 Filed 02/10/10 Page 2 of 2