Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01560/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01560-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO LUIS WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, CV F 05 1560 OWW WMW P

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 RE REQUESTS FOR INJUNCTIVE 

RELIEF (DOCS 9, 10, 17, 19, 26, 28, 31,

32, 33,36, 39, 41, 45)

DWIGHT WINSLOW, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody

of the California Department of Corrections at CCI Tehachapi, brought this action seeking

damages and injunctive relief against correctional officials for inadequate medical care. 

Along with this recommendation, a separate order will issue dismissing the

complaint, and granting Plaintiff’s requests for leave to file an amended complaint. The

complaint fails to state a claim for relief against any individual defendants. Specifically, the

court found Plaintiff’s allegations to be vague and conclusory. Plaintiff’s complaint consists of

generalized grievances and fails to charge any individual defendant with specific conduct.

Plaintiff has filed numerous requests for injunctive relief, seeking various orders

directing correctional officials to provide him with certain medical care. Plaintiff has not stated

a claim as to any of the defendants, and no defendant has been served or filed a response. The

Case 1:05-cv-01560-LJO -WMW Document 46 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

court must have personal jurisdiction over the parties to be enjoined; it may not enjoin

defendants not yet served or before the court. Zepeda v. United States I.N.S., 753 F.2d 719, 727

(9 Cir. 1983). th

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s motions seeking

injunctive relief be denied without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

thirty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 20, 2006 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01560-LJO -WMW Document 46 Filed 11/20/06 Page 2 of 2