Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02441/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-02441-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

---

FOLGER LEVIN &

KAHN LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF 

ALFRED P. ROES; CASE NO. CIV-S-00-2441 FCD JFM 

FOLGER LEVIN & KAHN LLP

Margaret R. Dollbaum (SB# 093725) 

M. Kay Martin (SB# 154697) 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 986-2800 

Facsimile: (415) 986-2827 

D. Stephen Schwabauer (SB# 173567) 

City Attorney 

City of Lodi, California 

221 West Pine Street 

Lodi, CA 95240 

Telephone: (209) 333-6701 

Facsimile: (209) 333-6807 

KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & 

GIRARD 

Daniel J. O’Hanlon (SB# 122380) 

Robert E. Murphy (SB# 040981) 

A Professional Corporation 

400 Capitol Mall, 27th Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814-4416 

Telephone: (916) 321-4500 

Facsimile: (916) 321-4555 

Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY OF LODI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CITY OF LODI, CALIFORNIA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

M&P INVESTMENTS, et al., 

Defendant. 

Case No. CIV-S-00-2441 FCD JFM 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT ALFRED P. 

ROES; ORDER 

AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS, 

COUNTERCLAIMS, THIRD-PARTY 

CLAIMS AND FOURTH-PARTY 

CLAIMS. 

Case 2:00-cv-02441-FCD-KJM Document 2708 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 4
FOLGER LEVIN &

KAHN LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

-2- 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF 

ALFRED P. ROES; CASE NO. CIV-S-00-2441 FCD JFM 

WHEREAS, plaintiff City of Lodi, California (“City”) filed Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended 

Complaint in the above action against multiple defendants on January 21, 2005, pursuant to this 

Court’s January 21, 2005 Order. 

WHEREAS, the Court, in its Fourth Amended Scheduling Order, dated January 26, 2005, 

stated that “[a]ll parties are deemed to have filed cross-complaints or counterclaims, as the 

circumstances warrants, against all other parties within their respective plume or area of 

contamination, as those plumes or areas of contamination are described in plaintiff’s Fourth 

Amended Complaint.” 

WHEREAS, on February 23, 2005, the Court entered an Order confirming the City’s 

settlement with the defendants listed in the Busy Bee Plume Area, except for defendants Alfred P. 

Roes and Theodore Rosen d/b/a Brackett’s Garage, and pursuant to that Order dismissed all 

complaints, counterclaims and cross-complaints concerning those settling parties. 

WHEREAS, the City has agreed to settle its claims against Alfred P. Roes, a defendant in 

the Busy Bee Plume Area. 

WHEREAS, pursuant to that settlement agreement, attached as Exhibit A, the City agreed 

to seek an order dismissing with prejudice defendant Alfred P. Roes from the above-referenced 

action. 

WHEREAS, the City, Alfred P. Roes and Theodore Rosen d/b/a/ Brackett’s Garage have 

stipulated to dismissing with prejudice all claims, cross-complaints or counterclaims against 

defendant Alfred P. Roes in the above-referenced action. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto that 

defendant Alfred P. Roes shall be dismissed with prejudice from the above-referenced action. 

DATED: April __, 2005 FOLGER LEVIN & KAHN LLP 

M. Kay Martin 

Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Lodi, California 

Case 2:00-cv-02441-FCD-KJM Document 2708 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 4
FOLGER LEVIN &

KAHN LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

-3- 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF 

ALFRED P. ROES; CASE NO. CIV-S-00-2441 FCD JFM 

DATED: April __, 2005 ADAMS NYE SINUNU & WALKER 

___________________________ 

James N. Sinunu 

Attorneys for Defendant Alfred P. Roes 

DATED: April __, 2005 ISOLA & ASSOCIATES LLP 

___________________________ 

David R. Isola 

Attorneys for Defendant Theodore H. Rosen d/b/a 

Brackett’s Garage 

Case 2:00-cv-02441-FCD-KJM Document 2708 Filed 04/26/05 Page 3 of 4
FOLGER LEVIN &

KAHN LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

-4- 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF 

ALFRED P. ROES; CASE NO. CIV-S-00-2441 FCD JFM 

ORDER 

Based on the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause existing therefore, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED THAT defendant Alfred P. Roes be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). 

DATED: April 25, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

 FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

20068\8002\428629.1 

Case 2:00-cv-02441-FCD-KJM Document 2708 Filed 04/26/05 Page 4 of 4