Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00054/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00054-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTICE SIMPSON, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

VO, MD, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00054-AWI-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 21)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 15)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

TO EXHAUST

Plaintiff Artice Simpson (“plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 27, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations that

recommended Defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted. The Findings and Recommendations

were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. To date, the parties have not

filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305,

this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

Case 1:05-cv-00054-AWI-LJO Document 24 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 27, 2006, are ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. Defendant Vo’s unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion, filed March 30, 2006, is

GRANTED; and,

3. This action is therefore DISMISSED in its entirety, without prejudice, based on

plaintiff’s failure to exhaust the available administrative remedies.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 16, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00054-AWI-LJO Document 24 Filed 09/18/06 Page 2 of 2