Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-00388/USCOURTS-casd-3_04-cv-00388-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1 Case No. 04-CV-0388 BTM (RBB) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

ON MOTION EXTENDING CERTAIN PRETRIAL DATES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WILLIAM D. CRESSWELL, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

HCAL CORPORATION, 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. 04-CV-0388 BTM (RBB) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

ON MOTION EXTENDING CERTAIN 

PRE-TRIAL DATES [Doc. #157]; 

and ORDER CONTINUING HEARING 

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

[Doc. #146] 

 Upon consideration of the Joint Motion Extending Certain Pre-Trial Dates submitted to the 

court for filing on March 23, 2007, 

1. The March 30, 2007, deadline for the parties to meet and confer, pursuant to Local 

Rule 16.1(f), shall be extended to May 11, 2007. 

2. The April 6, 2007, deadline for the parties to serve and lodge a revised pretrial 

order, including objections, with the Clerk of the Court, shall be extended to May 18, 2007. 

3. The Final Pretrial Conference, which is currently scheduled for April 12, 2007, at 

2:30 p.m. before the Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz, United States District Judge, shall be 

rescheduled so that it is held before Judge Moskowitz on May 23, 2007, at 3:00p.m. 

// 

// 

Case 3:04-cv-00388-BTM-RBB Document 159 Filed 03/27/07 Page 1 of 2
 2 Case No. 04-CV-0388 BTM (RBB) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

ON MOTION EXTENDING CERTAIN PRETRIAL DATES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4. The re-opening of discovery so that defendant HCAL Corporation may investigate 

certain categories of plaintiff William D. Cresswell’s damages until March 29, 2007, shall be 

extended until April 30, 2007. 

In addition, the Court, sua sponte, has determined that, in light of the ongoing settlement 

discussions, it is appropriate to continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s pending motion to dismiss, 

which is currently scheduled for March 29, 2007. Plaintiff’s motion shall be rescheduled for 

hearing on May 4, 2007 at 11:00am. The Court will hear oral argument on this motion at 

that time. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 27, 2007 ___________________________________________ 

JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT 

 

Case 3:04-cv-00388-BTM-RBB Document 159 Filed 03/27/07 Page 2 of 2