Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00308/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00308-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD E. WILMSHURST,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-06-0308 DFL PAN (GGH) PS

vs.

BILL LOCKYER, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed June 22, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within ten days,

why his action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 4(m) (service of summons on defendants). The ten day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:06-cv-00308-RRB-EFB Document 7 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 8/7/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

wilmshurst.fsc

Case 2:06-cv-00308-RRB-EFB Document 7 Filed 08/07/06 Page 2 of 2