Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02667/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02667-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY J. BIGGS, No. 2:04-cv-2667-MCE-CMK-P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

EDDIE YLST, Acting Warden,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this Petition for a Writ of Habeas

Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On October 20, 2006, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein

which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to

the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within ten (10) days. Petitioner has filed

Objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304,

this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-02667-MCE -CMK Document 34 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed October 20, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 29) is granted:

3. All of Petitioner’s claims, except his claims that the decision denying parole was

not based on sufficient evidence, and that he was improperly placed in waist chains and cuffs

during his parole hearing, are dismissed as procedurally barred; and

4. Respondent is directed to file an answer on the merits of the claims identified

above within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.

DATED: November 20, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02667-MCE -CMK Document 34 Filed 11/20/06 Page 2 of 2