Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00980/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-00980-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOHN M. HALL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NAGARA, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:19-cv-0980-EFB P 

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On December 12, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint and 

found service appropriate for defendant Nagara. ECF No. 12. That order gave plaintiff 30 days 

to submit the documents necessary for service of process on defendant and warned plaintiff that 

failure to comply with the order could result in dismissal of this case. The time for acting has 

passed and plaintiff has failed to comply with or otherwise respond to the court’s order. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk shall randomly assign a United States District 

Judge to this case. 

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

Case 2:19-cv-00980-KJM-EFB Document 15 Filed 01/29/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: January 29, 2020. 

Case 2:19-cv-00980-KJM-EFB Document 15 Filed 01/29/20 Page 2 of 2