Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-04484/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-04484-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Parrish v. County of Santa Cruz, et al. Amended Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Scheduling Dates

Case No. 18-cv-04484-NC 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KATHLEEN E. WELLS, State Bar No. 107051

Attorney at Law

3393 Maplethorpe Lane

Soquel, California 95073

Telephone: (831) 475-1243

Email: lioness@got.net

Attorney for Plaintiff THOMAS PARRISH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

THOMAS PARRISH,

 Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ; OFFICER 

GHANOW; CALIFORNIA FORENSIC 

MEDICAL GROUP AND 20 UNKNOWN 

AGENTS/EMPLOYEES OF THE COUNTY 

OF SANTA CRUZ and THE CALIFORNIA 

FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP,

 Defendants.

Case No. 18-cv-04484-HSG

AMENDED STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

Plaintiff THOMAS PARRISH (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, 

OFFICER DAVID GANSCHOW (erroneously sued as “Officer Ghanow”) (“County Defendants”),

and Defendant THE CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP (“CFMG”) submit the 

following stipulation and proposed order continuing the dates in the scheduling order. 

WHEREAS, on July 24, 2018, Plaintiff filed a complaint, on August 22, 2018, Plaintiff filed a 

first amended complaint, and on October 3, 2018, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint 

(“SAC”).

Case 4:18-cv-04484-HSG Document 61 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 4
Parrish v. County of Santa Cruz, et al. Amended Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Scheduling Dates

Case No. 18-cv-04484-NC 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Defendant CFMG filed an answer to Plaintiff’s SAC on October 10, 2018, 

Defendant County of Santa filed an answer to Plaintiff’s SAC on October 22, 2018, and Defendant 

Ganschow filed an answer to Plaintiff’s SAC on December 19, 2018.

WHEREAS, on October 31, 2018, County Defendants served Plaintiff with an initial set of 

discovery, and subsequently granted Plaintiff an extension to respond.

WHEREAS, in November and December 2018, Plaintiff’s counsel, Kathleen Wells, 

experienced serious medical issues which impeded her ability to respond to the County Defendants’

discovery or to litigate this matter;

WHEREAS, the settlement conference in this matter, formerly set for February 20, 2019, has 

been reset by order of Magistrate Beeler to June 4, 2019,

Therefore, Plaintiff, County Defendants, and Defendant CFMG stipulate and respectfully request as 

follows:

That the dates in the scheduling order be continued as follows:

Event Present Date Requested Date

Close of Fact Discovery 3/29/19 6/28/19

Exchange Opening Expert Reports 4/15/19 7/15/19

Exchange Rebuttal Expert Reports 4/29/19 7/29/19

Close of Expert Discovery 5/13/19 8/12/19

Disposition Motion Hearing 6/27/19 9/26/19

Pretrial Conference 9/24/19 11/26/19

Jury Trial (10 days) 10/7/19 12/09/19

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 1 , 2019 Law Office of Kathleen E. Wells

 

By: /s/

KATHLEEN E. WELLS, Attorney for 

Plaintiff Thomas Parrish 

Case 4:18-cv-04484-HSG Document 61 Filed 03/04/19 Page 2 of 4
Parrish v. County of Santa Cruz, et al. Amended Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Scheduling Dates

Case No. 18-cv-04484-NC 

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: March 1 , 2019 The Law Offices of Jerome M. Varanini

 By: /s/

JEROME M. VARANINI

 Attorney for Defendant California Forensic 

 Medical Group, Inc. 

Dated: March 1 , 2019 DANA McRAE, COUNTY COUNSEL

 By: /s/

RYAN THOMPSON

 Assistant County Counsel

Attorneys for Defendants County of Santa 

Cruz and Officer David Ganschow

[erroneously sued as “OFFICER 

GHANOW”]

Case 4:18-cv-04484-HSG Document 61 Filed 03/04/19 Page 3 of 4
Parrish v. County of Santa Cruz, et al. Amended Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Scheduling Dates

Case No. 18-cv-04484-NC 

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Good cause appearing and based on the stipulation of counsel, the Court makes the following 

Order:

The dates in the scheduling order are continued as follows:

Event Date

Close of Fact Discovery 6/28/19

Exchange Opening Expert Reports 7/15/19

Exchange Rebuttal Expert Reports 7/29/19

Close of Expert Discovery 8/12/19

Disposition Motion Hearing 9/26/19 at 2:00 p.m.

Pretrial Conference 11/26/19 at 3:00 p.m.

Jury Trial (10 days) 12/09/19 at 8:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:___________ ________________________________

THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

3/4/2019

Case 4:18-cv-04484-HSG Document 61 Filed 03/04/19 Page 4 of 4