Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00332/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00332-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID FALLON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0332 FCD KJM PS

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed April 25, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed

application and affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the

appropriate filing fee within twenty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:06-cv-00332-FCD-KJM Document 4 Filed 06/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 5, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/fallon332.fifp

Case 2:06-cv-00332-FCD-KJM Document 4 Filed 06/06/06 Page 2 of 2