Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04470/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04470-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470-JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER .

MARSHALL F. GOLDBERG, SBN 89677

GLASS & GOLDBERG

21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 430

Woodland Hills, CA 91367-3665

Tel: 818.888.2220

Fax: 818.888.2229

E-mail: mgoldberg@glassgoldberg.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant

PHILIPS MEDICAL CAPITAL, LLC

DIANE L. WEBB, State Bar No. 197851

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

One Market, Spear Street Tower

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126

Tel: 415.442.1000

Fax: 415.442.1001

E-mail: dwebb@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NORTH 

AMERICA, a division of Philips Electronics 

North America, Inc.

WILLIAM T. WEBB, State Bar No. 193832

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

425 Market Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

Tel: 415.777.3200

Fax: 415.541.9366

E-mail: wwebb@handonbridgett.com

Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party

Plaintiff MEDICAL INSIGHTS 

DIAGNOSTIC CENTERS, INC., a 

California Corporation; VIRGIL L. 

WILLIAMS, an individual; JOHN A. 

LYNCH, an individual; ARTHUR T. 

GRONNER, an individual and as Trustee of 

the Arthur T. and Bonnie S. Gronner Trust 

dated December 9, 1993; ARTHUR T. AND 

BONNIE S. GRONNER TRUST dated 

December 9, 1993

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PHILIPS MEDICAL CAPITAL, LLC, a 

Delaware limited liability company,

Plaintiff,

v.

MEDICAL INSIGHTS DIAGNOSTIC 

CENTERS, INC., a California Corporation; 

VIRGIL L. WILLIAMS, an individual; 

JOHN A. LYNCH, an individual; ARTHUR 

T. GRONNER, an individual and as Trustee 

of the Arthur T. and Bonnie S. Gronner 

Trust dated December 9, 1993; ARTHUR T. 

AND BONNIE S. GRONNER TRUST 

DATED DECEMBER 9, 1993 and DOES 1-

10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Location: Courtroom 2

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White

Complaint Filed: April 14, 2006

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM AND 

THIRD-PARTY CLAIM

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 1 of 12
 Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 1 of 12
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1

Plaintiff and counter-defendant, Philips Medical Capital, LLC (“PMC”), defendant and 

third-party plaintiff Medical Insights Diagnostic Centers, Inc., et al. (collectively “MIDC”), and 

third-party defendant Philips Medical Systems, a division of Philips Electronics North America, 

Inc. (“PMSNA”) (collectively “the parties”) hereby stipulate to the following protective order:

1. This stipulated protective order (“Order”) shall apply to the above captioned 

matter before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and all related matters 

between the parties that may be filed on or after the date of execution of the Order (the 

“Litigation”).

2. The Order shall bind the parties, all agents, attorneys, consultants and 

representatives of the parties who become signatories to the Order (by executing one of the 

Certifications attached as Exhibit A hereto), and any other signatory to the Order.

3. The parties further agree that monetary damages for violation of this Order are not 

a completely adequate remedy and that injunctive relief is also proper as a cumulative remedy.

4. The designation of information as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be limited to 

information that any producing party, including any third party, in good faith, believes to contain 

(a) trade secret, proprietary, or commercially sensitive information; (b) financial information; (c) 

information that should otherwise be subject to confidential treatment pursuant to applicable 

California law; or (d) confidential and identifiable health information (such as health information 

that is connected to a patient’s name, address, social security number or other identifying 

information) that is subject to the Standards of Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health 

Information, 45 CFR parts 160 and 164, promulgated pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability 

and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), or other similar statutory or regulatory privacy 

protections.

5. By designating a document, thing, material, testimony or other information derived 

therefrom as “CONFIDENTIAL,” under the terms of this Order, the party making the designation 

is certifying to the court that there is a good faith basis for the designation.

6. “CONFIDENTIAL” documents shall be so designated by stamping copies of the 

document produced to a party with the legend "CONFIDENTIAL." 

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 2 of 12
 Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 2 of 12
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2

7. The parties may designate deposition testimony and exhibits (or portions thereof) 

of any witness in the Litigation as “CONFIDENTIAL” at the time of the deposition by stating as 

such on the record and advising the reporter and all parties of such fact at the time. If any portion 

of a videotaped deposition is designated pursuant to this Paragraph, the videocassette or other 

videotape or CD-ROM container shall be labeled with the appropriate legend. Unless a shortened 

time period is requested as set forth below, within thirty (30) days of receipt of a transcript, the 

deponent, his/her counsel, or any other party may redesignate all or portions of the transcript 

“CONFIDENTIAL.” The deponent, his/her counsel or any other party shall list on a separate 

piece of paper the numbers of the pages of the deposition transcript containing 

“CONFIDENTIAL” information and serve the same on opposing counsel. Pending such 

designation, the entire deposition transcript, including exhibits, shall be deemed 

“CONFIDENTIAL” information. If no designation is made within thirty (30) days after receipt 

of the transcript, the transcript shall be deemed not to contain any “CONFIDENTIAL” 

information.

8. “CONFIDENTIAL” information may include or be included in any document, 

physical object, tangible thing, transcript or oral testimony or recorded statement, including, 

without limitation, transcripts, answers to interrogatories and other responses to discovery 

requests, e-mails, pleadings, briefs, rulings from a court or arbitration panel, summaries, notes, 

abstracts, motions, drawings, illustrations, diagrams, blueprints, journal entries, logbooks, 

compositions, devices, test reports, programs, code, commands, electronic media, databases, and 

any other records and reports which comprise, embody or summarize information about the 

producing party’s business, products, practices and procedures. Any such use shall itself be 

“CONFIDENTIAL” under this stipulation and Order.

9. Material designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” under this Order, the information 

contained therein, and any summaries, copies, abstracts, or other documents derived in whole or 

in part from material designated as confidential (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL”) 

shall be used only for the purpose of the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action, and for 

no other purpose.

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 3 of 12
 Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 3 of 12
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 3

10. CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL may be disclosed on a need to know basis, in the 

minimum amount necessary for the disclosure purpose, only to the following persons:

(a) corporate representatives and employees of a named party to the Litigation 

who have executed a Certification attached hereto as Exhibit A;

(b) in-house counsel of a named party to the Litigation who has executed a 

Certification attached hereto as Exhibit A;

(c) outside counsel representing a named party in the Litigation, including all 

paralegal assistants, and stenographic and clerical employees working under the supervision of 

such counsel;

(d) court reporters, interpreters, translators, copy services, graphic support 

services, document imaging services, and database/coding services retained by counsel, provided 

these individuals, or an appropriate company official with authority to do so on behalf of the 

company, executes a Certification attached hereto as Exhibit A;

(e) an expert or consultant who (i) is retained by any attorney described in 

Paragraphs 9(b) and (c) to assist with the Litigation, (ii) agrees not to use nor disclose such 

CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL in any other litigation or proceeding; and (iii) has executed a 

Certification attached hereto as Exhibit A;

(f) a person who prepared, received, or reviewed the CONFIDENTIAL 

MATERIAL prior to its production in the Litigation;

(g) during depositions, preparation for depositions, testimony in a hearing, and 

preparation for testimony in a hearing, a witness who is a current employee of the party that 

produced the applicable document(s) or who appears, based upon the document itself or other 

testimony, to have knowledge of the contents of the CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL or the 

specific events, transactions, discussions, or date reflected in the CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL, 

provided such witness executes a Certification attached hereto as Exhibit A;

(h) any mediators utilized in the Litigation;

(i) this Court, the appointed arbitrators or any Special Masters and/or 

Mediators appointed by the Court. 

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 4 of 12
 Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 4 of 12
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 4

11. This Order does not apply to any information or documents:

(a) already in the possession of a receiving party and not subject to any 

obligation of confidentiality; and

(b) acquired by a receiving party from a third party without being designated 

confidential or similar material unless the third party received the information or documents 

subject to any form of confidentiality protection.

12. All information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” in accordance with the terms of 

this Order and produced or exchanged in the course of the Litigation shall be used or disclosed 

solely for the purpose of the Litigation and in accordance with the provisions of this Order. Such 

“CONFIDENTIAL” information shall not be used nor relied upon for any business or other 

purpose, including for the purpose of competing in any way with or transacting business in 

any way with a disclosing party, nor used nor relied upon in any other litigation or other 

proceeding, except by court order or otherwise required by law.

13. Any person or party receiving CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS that receives a 

request or subpoena for production or disclosure of such CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS shall 

promptly give notice by facsimile to the producing party identifying the information sought and 

enclosing a copy of the subpoena or request. Provided that the producing party makes a timely 

motion or other application for relief from the subpoena or other request in the appropriate forum, 

the person or party subject to the subpoena or other request shall not produce or disclose the 

requested information without consent of the producing party or until ordered by a court of 

competent jurisdiction. 

14. Counsel shall inform each person to whom they disclose or give access to 

CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS the terms of this Order, as well as the obligation to comply with 

each of those terms. Persons receiving CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS are prohibited from 

disclosing it to any person except in conformance with this Order. The recipient of any 

CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS agrees to subject himself/herself to the jurisdiction of any Court 

having jurisdiction over this Litigation or the parties for the purpose of any proceedings relating 

to the performance under, compliance with, or violation of this Order.

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 5 of 12
 Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 5 of 12
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 5

15. The recipient of any CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS shall maintain such 

information in a secure and safe area and shall exercise the same standard of due and proper care 

with respect to the storage, custody, use and/or dissemination of such information as is exercised 

by the recipient with respect to his or her own confidential or proprietary information. 

16. Counsel for the parties agree to maintain a file of all Certifications (Exhibit A) 

required by this Order.

17. Nothing in this Order shall be construed in any way as a finding that information 

designated “CONFIDENTIAL” actually is “CONFIDENTIAL” information. Any party may 

object, in writing, to the designation by another party by specifying the information in issue and 

its grounds for questioning the designation. A party shall not be obligated to challenge the 

propriety of a designation at the time made, and a failure to do so shall not preclude any 

subsequent challenge. In the event that any party to the Litigation disagrees at any point in these 

proceedings with the designation by the producing party, the parties shall try first to dispose of 

such dispute in good faith on an informal basis. If the parties’ cannot resolve the dispute within 

ten (10) days of service of a written objection, the party challenging the designation may file a 

motion to compel within another twenty-one (21) days after the parties’ informal attempts at 

resolution have concluded. The information, documents or materials shall continue to receive the 

protection of their designation until the Court rules on the motion. The party that designated the 

information “CONFIDENTIAL” shall have the burden of demonstrating the propriety of its 

designation.

18. Nothing herein shall be construed to be an admission of relevance or to affect, in 

any way, the admissibility of any documents, testimony or other evidence in the Litigation. This 

Order is without prejudice to the right of any party, if any, to bring before the Court at any time 

the question of whether any particular information is or is not discoverable or admissible.

19. Nothing in this Order shall bar or otherwise restrict any attorney herein from 

rendering advice to clients with respect to the Litigation and in the course thereof, referring to or 

relying upon the attorney’s examination of CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS so long as the 

attorney does not disclose the “CONFIDENTIAL” information itself.

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 6 of 12
 Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 6 of 12
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 6

20. The inadvertent or mistaken disclosure by a producing party of 

“CONFIDENTIAL” information shall not constitute a waiver of any claim of confidentiality 

except where: (a) the producing party notifies a receiving party in writing of such inadvertent or 

mistaken disclosure within ten (10) business days of becoming aware of such disclosure and, (b) 

within thirty (30) days of such notice, the producing party fails to provide properly redesignated 

documents to the receiving party. During the thirty (30) day period after notice, the materials 

shall be treated as designated in the producing party’s notice. Upon receipt of properly 

redesignated documents, the receiving party shall return all unmarked or incorrectly designated 

documents and other materials to the producing party within five (5) business days. The 

receiving party shall not retain copies thereof and shall treat information contained in said 

documents and materials and any summaries or notes thereof as appropriately marked pursuant to 

the producing party’s notice.

21. Should any “CONFIDENTIAL” information be disclosed, through inadvertence or 

otherwise, by a receiving party to any person or party not authorized under this Order, then the 

receiving party shall: (a) immediately notify the disclosing/producing party or entity; (b) use its 

best efforts to obtain the return of any such “CONFIDENTIAL” information and to bind such 

person or party to the terms of this Order; (c) within seven (7) business days of the discovery of 

such disclosure, inform such person of all provisions of this Order and identify such person or 

party to the producing party; and (d) request such person or party to sign the Certification 

attached hereto as Exhibit A. The executed Certification shall be served upon counsel for the 

producing party within ten (10) business days of its execution by the party to whom the 

“CONFIDENTIAL” information was inadvertently disclosed. Nothing in this Paragraph is 

intended to limit the remedies that the producing party may pursue for breach of this Order.

22. This Order shall be without prejudice to the right of the parties (i) to bring before 

the Court at any time the question of whether any particular document or information is 

confidential or whether its use should be restricted or (ii) to present a motion to the Court under 

FRCP 26(c) for a separate protective order as to any particular document or information, 

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 7 of 12
 Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 7 of 12
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 7

including restrictions differing from those as specified herein. This Order shall not be deemed to 

prejudice the parties in any way in any future application for modification of this Order. 

23. This Order is entered solely for the purpose of facilitating the exchange of 

documents and information between the parties to this action without involving the Court 

unnecessarily in the process. Nothing in this Order nor the production of any information or 

document under the terms of this Order nor any proceedings pursuant to this Order shall be 

deemed to have the effect of an admission or waiver by either party or of altering the 

confidentiality or nonconfidentiality of any such document or information or altering any existing 

obligation of any party or the absence thereof. 

24. This Order shall survive the termination of the Litigation and shall continue in full 

force and effect thereafter.

25. After final termination of this Litigation, the outside counsel for a named party 

may each retain one copy of deposition transcripts and exhibits, Court transcripts and exhibits, 

and documents and other materials submitted to the Court. Nothing herein shall require the return 

or destruction of attorney work product. Such material shall continue to be treated as designated 

under this Order. Within sixty (60) days after final termination of the Litigation, at the request of 

the producing party, counsel for the receiving party either shall (a) return all additional 

CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS in his/her possession, custody or control or in the custody of 

any authorized agents, outside experts and consultants retained or utilized by counsel for the 

receiving party to counsel for the party who has provided such CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS 

in discovery or (b) certify destruction thereof to the producing party’s counsel. As to 

“CONFIDENTIAL” information reflected in computer databases or backup tapes or any other 

electronic form, the receiving party shall erase all such “CONFIDENTIAL” information.

26. Within thirty (30) days after final termination (including the time limits for 

appeals) of the Litigation, outside counsel for a named party shall retrieve from the Court all 

“CONFIDENTIAL” information that it filed with the Court during the Litigation and return or 

dispose of such information in accordance with the above.

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 8 of 12
 Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 8 of 12
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 8

27. If information subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege or work product 

immunity is inadvertently or mistakenly produced, such production shall in no way prejudice or 

otherwise constitute a waiver of, or estoppel as to, any claim of privilege or work-product 

immunity for such information. If a party has inadvertently or mistakenly produced information 

subject to a claim of immunity or privilege, upon written request made by the producing party 

within twenty-one (21) days of discovery of such inadvertent or mistaken production, the 

information for which a claim of inadvertent production is made, including all copies, shall be 

returned within seven (7) business days of such request unless the receiving party intends to 

challenge the producing party’s assertion of privilege or immunity. All copies of inadvertently or 

mistakenly produced documents shall be destroyed, and any document or material information 

reflecting the contents of the inadvertently produced information shall be expunged. If a 

receiving party objects to the return of such information within the seven (7) business day period 

described above, the producing party may move the Court for an order compelling the return of 

such information. Pending the ruling, a receiving party may retain the inadvertently or 

mistakenly produced documents in a sealed envelope and shall not make any use of such 

information.

28. Nothing in this Order shall prevent any party from applying to the Court for relief 

therefrom, or from applying to the Court for further or additional protective orders or 

modification of this Order.

29. Nothing in this Order shall preclude any party from retaining experts or 

consultants of their choice in this litigation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 9 of 12
 Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 9 of 12
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 9

Dated: January 22, 2007 GLASS & GOLDBERG

By /s/

Marshall F. Goldberg

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterDefendant Philips Medical Capital, LLC

Dated: January 22, 2007 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

By /s/

William T. Webb

Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party

Plaintiff Medical Insights Diagnostic 

Centers, Inc., et al. 

Dated: January 22, 2007 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

By /s/

Diane L. Webb

Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant

Philips Medical Systems North America, a 

division of Philips Electronics North 

America, Inc.

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 10 of 12
 Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 10 of 12
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 10

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January ____, 2007

By

Hon. Jeffrey S. White

United States District Court Judge for the 

Northern District of California

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 11 of 12

27

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 11 of 12
MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1-SF/7453352.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. C 06-4470 JSW

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 11

CERTIFICATION - EXHIBIT A

I hereby certify that I have read the attached Stipulated Protective Order in the Philips 

Medical Capital, LLC v. Medical Insights Diagnostics Centers, Inc., et al. litigation (the 

“Litigation”), and I agree that I will not reveal “CONFIDENTIAL” information to, or discuss 

such with, any person who is not entitled to receive “CONFIDENTIAL” information in 

accordance with the Stipulated Protective Order, I will use and rely upon “CONFIDENTIAL” 

information only for the purposes of facilitating the prosecution or defense of the Litigation and 

not for any business or other purpose, including for any competitive purpose. I will otherwise 

keep all “CONFIDENTIAL” information confidential in accordance with this Stipulated 

Protective Order. I agree that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has 

jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order, and I consent to jurisdiction of 

the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California over my person for that purpose. I 

will otherwise be bound by the strictures of the Stipulated Protective Order, whose terms shall be 

deemed fully incorporated herein.

Dated:

[Print Name]

[Company]

[Address]

Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 66 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 12 of 12
 Case 3:06-cv-04470-JSW Document 69 Filed 01/26/07 Page 12 of 12