Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-14-03171/USCOURTS-ca8-14-03171-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3171

___________________________

Michael Joseph Harasyn,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

Gregory Edward Krause; Kathleen Anne Krause; Betsy Lou Harasyn,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees.

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: April 3, 2015

Filed: April 8, 2015

[Unpublished] 

____________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Appellate Case: 14-3171 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2015 Entry ID: 4262880 
Michael Harasyn appeals the district court’s dismissal, for lack of subject

1

matter jurisdiction, of his pro se complaint claiming his rights were violated in prior

divorce and child-custody proceedings in state court. Upon consideration of

Harasyn’s arguments on appeal, and upon careful de novo review of the district

court’s dismissal, see Edwards v. City of Jonesboro, 645 F.3d 1014, 1017 (8th Cir.

2011), we agree with the district court that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction, see

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544 U.S. 280, 284 (2005), and we

find nothing improper in the proceedings below, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Minn.

Majority v. Manksy, 708 F.3d 1051, 1056 (8th Cir. 2013).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable MichaelJ. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations ofthe Honorable

Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Appellate Case: 14-3171 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2015 Entry ID: 4262880