Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-04662/USCOURTS-cand-4_18-cv-04662-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RABAB ABDULHADI,

Plaintiff,

vs. 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA 

STATE UNIVERSITY, ET. AL.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 4:18-cv-04662-YGR 

ORDER (1) VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE, TRIAL, AND RELATED DATES, AND (2) SETTING LIMITED DEADLINES

Re: Dkt. No. 74 

The Court is in receipt of the parties’ jointly filed case management conference statement. 

(Dkt. No. 74-3 (redacted version), 74-4 (unredacted, sealed version).)1

 The Court has reviewed the 

statement and, finding good cause, the Court VACATES the case management conference, trial date 

and related dates. That said, the Court is far from satisfied that a sufficient showing has been made to 

delay trial in this matter until January 2023. Instead, in light of the ongoing national emergency 

involving the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), the showing that has been made, and the specific 

extensions requested, the Court HEREBY ORDERS the following limited deadlines: 

Deadline for Plaintiff to Respond to California 

State University’s Document Demands 

June 15, 2020 

Deadline for Plaintiff’s Deposition August 15, 2020 

Deadline for Settlement Conference September 30, 2020 

1

 The parties have also filed an administrative motion to file under seal an unredacted version 

of the case management conference statement, because the portions that are sought to be redacted 

contain sensitive medical information. Having reviewed the unredacted version of the case 

management statement, and the specific information that is sought to be redacted, the Court finds that 

such information is “privileged, protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under 

the law.” Civ. L.R. 79-5(b). For these sections, “compelling reasons” exist to rebut the presumption 

of public access to judicial records. Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1101 

(9th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the administrative motion to file the unredacted case 

management statement under seal. 

Case 4:18-cv-04662-YGR Document 76 Filed 04/01/20 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

Further Case Management Conference (to Reset 

Dates) 

October 19, 2020 

This Order terminates Docket Number 74. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 1, 2020 

____________________________________ 

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

CC: MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

Case 4:18-cv-04662-YGR Document 76 Filed 04/01/20 Page 2 of 2