Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00459/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00459-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Jesus A. Garcia (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action currently proceeds on 

Plaintiff’s claims for deliberate indifference to his health and safety in violation of the Eighth 

Amendment against Defendants J. Mejia and J. Faure. 

On May 4, 2016, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint under Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim.1(ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff’s opposition was due 

on or before May 31, 2016. Plaintiff filed no opposition, and thus on June 8, 2016, Plaintiff was 

ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion within twenty-

 

1 The motion was originally filed by Defendant Faure, and was joined by Defendant Mejia. (ECF No. 

27.)

JESUS A. GARCIA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00459-BAM (PC)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE 

TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO OBEY 

COURT ORDER

(ECF No. 28)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

Case 1:14-cv-00459-AWI-BAM Document 30 Filed 07/13/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

one (21) days. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff was also expressly warned that the failure to comply with that 

order would result in dismissal of his action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute and failure to obey 

a court order. (Id. at 2.) To date, Plaintiff has not complied with that order, nor has he otherwise been 

in contact with the Court. Plaintiff will be permitted one final opportunity to show cause why this 

action should not be dismissed with prejudice.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause by WRITTEN response 

within fourteen (14) days of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed, with 

prejudice, for failure to obey the Court’s order and for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is warned that if 

the response does not show GOOD CAUSE, this matter will be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 13, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00459-AWI-BAM Document 30 Filed 07/13/16 Page 2 of 2