Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01614/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01614-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 49:781 Forfeiture

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING

AGENCY,

NO. CIV. S-04-1614 WBS KJM

Plaintiff

v. O R D E R

BRYAN DEVORE, DEVORE

CONSTRUCTION INC., DEVORE

EXCAVATION & SNOW REMOVAL,

Defendants.

----oo0oo---- 

In his statement in opposition to plaintiff’s motion

for summary judgment, defendant Bryan Devore request that the

hearing on the motion be continued for 90 days to allow him to

consult with an attorney and secure legal representation. Devore

argues that such a continuance is necessary because plaintiff’s

“legal maneuvering and the volume of paperwork they have created

[have made it] beyond [defendants’] ability to respond without

council [sic].” (Defs.’ Separate Statement in Opp. To Mot. For

Summary Judgment ¶ 2). The court is reluctant to grant such a

lengthy continuance at this point in the case. However, the

Case 2:04-cv-01614-WBS -KJM Document 21 Filed 05/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

court will consider the parties’ arguments regarding a possible

continuance of lesser duration at oral argument on May 31, 2005

at 1:30 p.m. before it hears argument on the merits of

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. 

DATED: May 23, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-01614-WBS -KJM Document 21 Filed 05/24/05 Page 2 of 2