Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03387/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-03387-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50951/2373188.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AFTER CONSOLIDATION

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP

Scott G. Lawson (Bar No. 174671)

scottlawson@quinnemanuel.com

Patrick Doolittle (Bar No. 203659)

patrickdoolittle@quinnemanuel.com

Andrea Pallios Roberts (Bar No. 228128)

andreaproberts@quinnemanuel.com

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 875-6600

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

Attorneys for Defendant

International Business Machines Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN JOSE DIVISION)

MARY HELEN WOODSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 

CORPORATION and DOES ONE through 

TWENTY, Inclusive,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C 05-03387 JF (PVT)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO 

FILE RESPONSE TO THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AFTER CONSOLIDATION

WHEREAS, on January 11, 2008, the parties entered into a stipulation extending IBM’s 

deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint After Consolidation to February 1, 

2008 and continuing the Case Management Conference scheduled for February 15, 2008 to March 

21, 2008;

WHEREAS, the purpose for the parties’ January 11, 2008 stipulation was that they were in 

negotiations regarding settlement of the matter, required additional time for those negotiations, 

and wished to postpone a response to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint After Consolidation to 

avoid any unnecessary increase in litigation costs that might affect the possibility of settlement;

WHEREAS, the parties have not yet settled the matter, but continue to be in negotiations 

regarding settlement, require additional time for those negotiations, and continue to wish to 

**E-filed 2/12/08** ----------------

Case 5:05-cv-03387-JF Document 111 Filed 02/12/08 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50951/2373188.1

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AFTER CONSOLIDATION

postpone a response to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint After Consolidation and the related 

litigation expenses associated with such a response;

WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend the deadline for IBM to respond to Plaintiff’s 

Third Amended Complaint After Consolidation until February 29, 2008;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that any hearing on IBM’s response to Plaintiff’s Third 

Amended Complaint After Consolidation, if necessary, shall be scheduled no earlier than April 4, 

2008; and

WHEREAS, the parties are not requesting that the Case Management Conference, 

currently scheduled for March 21, 2008, at 10:30 a.m., be rescheduled (but do not object to its 

being moved if the Court should so desire).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, that 

IBM’s response to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint After Consolidation shall be due on 

February 29, 2008 and any hearing on IBM’s response to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint 

After Consolidation, if necessary, shall be scheduled no earlier than April 4, 2008.

Dated: January 31, 2008 MARY HELEN WOODSON

By /s/ Mary Helen Woodson

Mary Helen Woodson

Dated: January 31, 2008 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER &

HEDGES, LLP

By /s/ Scott G. Lawson

Scott G. Lawson

Attorneys for Defendant

International Business Machines Corporation

Case 5:05-cv-03387-JF Document 111 Filed 02/12/08 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50951/2373188.1

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AFTER CONSOLIDATION

Order

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation between the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

Jeremy Fogel

United States District Judge

2/12/08

Case 5:05-cv-03387-JF Document 111 Filed 02/12/08 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50951/2373188.1

-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AFTER CONSOLIDATION

Signature Attestation

I hereby attest that Plaintiff Mary Helen Woodson read and agreed to the above 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE 

RESPONSE TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AFTER CONSOLIDATION and gave 

Quinn Emanuel permission to sign and file the stipulation on her behalf. 

Dated: January 31, 2008 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER &

HEDGES, LLP

By /s/ Scott G. Lawson

Scott G. Lawson

Attorneys for Defendant 

International Business Machines Corporation

Case 5:05-cv-03387-JF Document 111 Filed 02/12/08 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50951/2373188.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of 

eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 555 Twin Dolphin

Drive, Suite 560, Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139.

On January 31, 2008, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE 

RESPONSE TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AFTER CONSOLIDATION on the 

parties in this action as follows:

BY MAIL: On January 31, 2008, I enclosed the foregoing into sealed envelope(s) addressed as 

shown above, and I deposited such envelope(s) in the mail at Redwood Shores, California. The 

envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid.

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL TRANSMISSION: By electronic mail transmission from 

andreaproberts@quinnemanuel.com on January 31, 2008, by transmitting a PDF format copy of 

such document(s) to each such person at the e-mail address listed below their address(es). The 

document(s) was/were transmitted by electronic transmission and such transmission was reported 

as complete and without error.

Mary Helen Woodson

475 Milan Drive, #102

San Jose, CA 95134

Telephone: 408-944-9152

Cell Phone: 408-206-4087

helenwoodson@gmail.com

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose 

direction the service was made.

Executed on January 31, 2008, at Redwood Shores, California.

/s/ Andrea Pallios Roberts

Andrea Pallios Roberts

Case 5:05-cv-03387-JF Document 111 Filed 02/12/08 Page 5 of 5