Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05399/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05399-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THADRON BEAL,

Plaintiff,

vs.

M.Y. SPARKMAN, LT., 

Defendant. 

 /

1:04-cv-05399-OWW-LJO-P

 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 27)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 26)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Thadron Beal (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro

se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On March 22, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:04-cv-05399-OWW -LJO Document 28 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed March 22, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the action on the grounds

plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, filed 

December 8, 2005, is GRANTED; and,

3. The action is therefore DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05399-OWW -LJO Document 28 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 2