Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05515/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05515-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Normally, the Court would direct the parties to so inform the Court in their joint

case management statement filed in connection with a case management conference. 

Because the instant action involves a review of an administrative record, however, a case

management conference has not been scheduled.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROSADA CASTANEDA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant. /

No. C 14-05515 JSW

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

TO INFORM COURT

REGARDING CONSENT TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL

PURPOSES

In cases initially assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to

reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final

judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). The Court has received notice of such consent from

Defendant. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to advise the Court, no later than

February 6, 2015, as to whether she consents to have a magistrate judge conduct all further

proceedings in the instant action. For the parties’ convenience, consent forms are available at

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section.1

 The parties are further advised that they

may jointly request assignment to a specific magistrate judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 21, 2015 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:14-cv-05515-JSW Document 10 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:14-cv-05515-JSW Document 10 Filed 01/21/15 Page 2 of 2