Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00986/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00986-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Contitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LONGSTREET'S DELICATESSEN, FINE 

WINES & SPECIALTY COFFEES, L.L.C., 

a Virginia Company; SHARON L. 

WINTORY, an individual; and ELLEN 

ANSOLABEHERE, an individual,

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

JERRY R. JOLLY, DIRECTOR, 

California Alcoholic Beverage Control 

Board, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 1:06-cv-00986-OWW-DLB 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX 

PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER 

GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO 

FILE AN OVERSIZED 

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 

AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

DECLARATORY RELIEF 

[AFFIDAVIT OF MATTHEW S. HALE 

IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION 

FILED CONCURRENTLY] 

) 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-00986-OWW -DLB Document 25 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

The Court, having reviewed the Affidavit of Matthew S. Hale hereby GRANTS 

Plaintiffs’ ex parte application for leave to file an oversized memorandum of points and 

authorities of 40 or less pages in support of Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and 

declaratory judgment. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. Plaintiffs may file an oversized memorandum of points and authorities of 40 or 

less pages in support of their motion for summary judgment and declaratory 

judgment. 

2. Plaintiffs’ previously filed Affidavits, and Separate Statement of Uncontroverted 

Facts, etc. filed in support of their prior Motion for Summary Judgment need not 

be refilled and may be considered in connection with Plaintiffs’ revised and 

shortened Motion for Summary Judgment. 

Dated: 9/7/06 _/s/ Oliver W. Wanger_____________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:06-cv-00986-OWW -DLB Document 25 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 2