Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_05-cv-00163/USCOURTS-ared-4_05-cv-00163-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

In re: 

PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

LINDA REEVES

v.

WYETH

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: 

MDL Docket No. 4:03CV1507-WRW

 4:05CV00163

PLAINTIFF

 

 DEFENDANT

ORDER

Pending are Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Plaintiff’s Requests for

Production Part 5 (Doc. No. 260), Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Argument

that Wyeth Should Have Conducted a “WHI-Like” Study (Doc. No. 303), and Defendant’s

Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Statute of Limitations (Doc. No. 298).

Based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law made in a hearing held today, I rule

as follows:

 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production 

Part 5 (Doc. No. 260) is DENIED for the time being. If any of the requested documents are

offered into evidence, or mentioned by a defense witness, I will conduct a hearing to determine

whether the documents were properly withheld under the “work product” privilege. If not, I will

instruct the jury to the effect that they were improperly withheld from Plaintiff by Defendant,

thus causing the delay in the trial. 

Case 4:05-cv-00163-BRW Document 310 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 2
2

2. Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Bar Evidence and Argument that Wyeth Should 

Have Conducted a “WHI-Like” Study (Doc. No. 303) is DENIED.

3. After careful consideration, Defendant’s Second Renewed Motion for Summary 

Judgment Re: Statute of Limitations (Doc. No. 298), filed last Friday, is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of July, 2006.

/s/ Wm. R.Wilson,Jr. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:05-cv-00163-BRW Document 310 Filed 07/31/06 Page 2 of 2