Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01045/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01045-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERNEST ALDRIDGE, No. CIV S-10-1045-FCD-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

J. GARCIA,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action relating to notices

posted on real property incident to a foreclosure order. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On November 10, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file

objections within a specified time.1

 No objections to the findings and recommendations have

1 Separate findings and recommendations were also issued on September 16, 2010,

recommending dismissal of this action for plaintiff’s failure to submit a scheduling conference

statement or appear at a scheduling conference held on September 9, 2010. After those findings

and recommendations were issued, defendant requested that the court rule on his pending motion

to dismiss notwithstanding plaintiff’s lack of prosecution. Specifically, defendant sought a

disposition on the merits. 

1

Case 2:10-cv-01045-FCD-CMK Document 14 Filed 01/05/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 16, 2010, are vacated;

2. The findings and recommendations filed November 10, 2010, are adopted

in full;

3. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 5) is granted;

4. This action is dismissed with prejudice; 

5. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 7) is denied as moot; and 

6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 

DATED: January 4, 2011.

2

Case 2:10-cv-01045-FCD-CMK Document 14 Filed 01/05/11 Page 2 of 2