Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01496/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01496-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SPECIALIZED BICYCLE COMPONENTS,

INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SCOTT USA, INC.,

Defendant.

 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

 /

No. C 04-01496 JSW

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART THE

PARTIES’ REQUESTS TO FILE

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Now before the Court are: (1) the miscellaneous administrative request by Scott USA,

Inc. (“Scott”) to file under seal portions of its reply brief in support of its motion for summary

judgment and exhibits 1 through 5 attached to the declaration of Mark P. Vrla in support of its

reply brief, and (2) the miscellaneous administrative request by Specialized Bicycle

Components, Inc. (“Specialized”) to file under seal portions of its sur-reply brief to Scott’s

motion for summary judgment and exhibit 16 to the Supplemental Declaration of Mike Sinyard. 

Having reviewed the parties’ papers, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS IN PART

and DENIES IN PART the parties’ requests. 

Scott’s request to file portions of its reply brief under seal is GRANTED as to pages 3, 4,

5 and 9, and is DENIED as to pages 1, 2 and 10. Scott’s request to file under seal exhibits 1

through 5 attached to the declaration of Mark P. Vrla in support of its reply brief is GRANTED.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Specialized’s request to file portions of its sur-reply brief under seal is GRANTED as to

page 2, and is DENIED as pages 3 and 4. Specialized’s request to file exhibit 16 to the

Supplemental Declaration of Mike Sinyard under seal is GRANTED.

By no later than July 28, 2005, Scott and Specialized are directed to file redacted

versions of their briefs. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged copies of Scott’s reply brief and

exhibits 1 through 5 to the declaration of Mark P. Vrla in support of its reply brief and the

lodged copies of Specialized’s sur-reply brief and exhibit 16 to the Supplemental Declaration of

Mike Sinyard under seal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2005 /s/ Jeffrey S. White 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE