Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-3_06-cv-03002/USCOURTS-arwd-3_06-cv-03002-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HARRISON DIVISION

ROBERT D. JOHNSTON and

MELANIE K. JOHNSTON PLAINTIFFS

V. 06-CV-03002

JASON BRISCO, et. al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Currently before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motion to

reconsider (Doc. 68) and Separate Defendants Gordon Webb, John

Putman, Gary Isbell, James Johnson, and Trish Smith’s response

(Doc. 69). A motion to reconsider must give the Court reasons for

changing its decision. See Strato v. Ashcroft, 388 F.3d 651 (8th

Cir. 2004). There is no reason to grant such motion if it merely

reiterates reasons that failed to convince the Court in the first

place. See id. We find Plaintiffs’ motion “merely reiterates” the

arguments previously presented before the Court. Accordingly,

Plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/S/Robert T. Dawson

Robert T. Dawson

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-03002-RTD Document 70 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>