Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00538/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00538-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMI MITRI, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

WALGREEN CO., INC. dba )

WALGREENS, and DOES 1 to 20, )

inclusive, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

1:10-cv-538 AWI SKO

ORDER ON DUPLICATE

MOTION

(Doc. No. 100)

On September 7, 2011, Plaintiff filed two motions for new trial on the limited issue of

emotional distress damages. See Court’s Docket Doc. Nos. 100, 102. The motions are identical,

except the first motion, which is the Doc. No. 100, identifies a hearing date of October 3, 2014. 

A Clerk’s notice was entered after Doc. No. 100 was filed. The Clerk’s notice reads: “Please

disregard docket entry 100 MOTION for NEW TRIAL (incorrect date). Corrected entry to be

refiled.” See id. at No. 101. After the Clerk’s notice, Plaintiff refiled his motion as Doc. No.

102, but this time with a correct hearing date of October 3, 2011. For administrative purposes

only, the Court will deny Doc. No. 100 as being identical to and duplicative of Doc. No. 102.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion at Docket Entry 100 is

DENIED as a duplicate motion. This order in no way effects Doc. No. 102 or Doc. No. 102's

October 3, 2011 hearing date.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 8, 2011 

ciem0h CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cv-00538-AWI-SKO Document 104 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 1