Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03340/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03340-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C-06-3340 ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CANDACE LEE, 

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, ET AL.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

No. C 06-3340 SBA (JL)

ORDER

All discovery in this case has been referred by the district court (Hon. Saundra

Brown Armstrong) as provided by 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and Civil Local Rule 72. This district

court issued an order (Docket # 92) referring discovery disputes to this Court for resolution.

Specifically, the following issues:

"Lee contends that the defendants have failed to produce portions of transcripts,

have failed to produce a number of individual defendants for deposition, have produced

only two minutes of a 911 tape, and have failed to produce police training policies and

procedures." (Order at 1:19-22)

As provided in this Court’s Standing Order regarding discovery disputes, the parties

are hereby ordered to meet and confer within ten days of the e-filing of this Order and to file

either their joint statement or their individual statements, within five days of meeting and

conferring. This Court’s Standing Order provides:

Case 4:06-cv-03340-SBA Document 113 Filed 06/08/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C-06-3340 ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER Page 2 of 2

Parties shall meet and confer in person, or, if counsel are located outside the Bay

Area, by telephone, to attempt to resolve their dispute informally. A mere exchange

of letters, telephone calls, or facsimile transmissions does not satisfy the

requirement to meet and confer.

If, after a good faith effort, the parties have not resolved their dispute, they shall

prepare a concise joint statement of 5 pages or less without affidavits or exhibits,

stating the nature and status of their dispute. If a joint statement is not possible,

each side may submit a brief individual statement of 2 pages or less. The joint

statement or individual statements shall be filed or e-filed, and courtesy copies

submitted as provided by the Civil Local Rules. The Court will advise the parties

regarding the need, if any, for more formal briefing or a hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 DATED: June 8, 2007

__________________________________

 JAMES LARSON

 Chief Magistrate Judge

G:\JLALL\CHAMBERS\CASES\CIV-REF\06-3340\meet&confer.wpd

Case 4:06-cv-03340-SBA Document 113 Filed 06/08/07 Page 2 of 2