Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00453-73/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 380
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

HOGAN LOVELLS US

LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SILICON VALLEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPLE INC.’S REPLY

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

\\029613/000057 - 1699164 v2 

Robert B. Hawk (Bar No. 118054)

Stacy Hovan (Bar No. 271485)

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100

Menlo Park, California 94025

Telephone: + 1 (650) 463-4000

Facsimile: + 1 (650) 463-4199

robert.hawk@hoganlovells.com

stacy.hovan@hoganlovells.com

Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC.

[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MARC OPPERMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PATH, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 13-cv-00453-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY 

IN SUPPORT OF APPLE INC.’S MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR

Date: November 3, 2016

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Judge: Honorable Jon S. Tigar

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO CASES:

Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST

Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST

Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 840 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 5
HOGAN LOVELLS US

LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SILICON VALLEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPLE INC.’S REPLY

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

\\029613/000057 - 1699164 v2 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Plaintiffs, through 

their respective counsel, have stipulated to request an Order extending the deadline for Apple to 

file its Reply brief in support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by one week, from 

September 26, 2016 to October 3, 2016, based on the following recitals.

WHEREAS on April 22, 2016, Apple filed its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

Regarding the Path App (ECF No. 694);

WHEREAS on August 29, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Apple’s Motion for 

Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 818);

WHEREAS unredacted copies of certain materials designated as confidential by another 

defendant, which were conditionally filed under seal, were not served on Apple until several days 

after the opposition was filed;

WHEREAS the hearing on Apple’s summary judgment motion is currently set for 

November 3, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.;

WHEREAS Apple desires one additional week to prepare its reply, and Plaintiffs are 

agreeable to that request, and the parties have agreed to the requested extension of time;

THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Apple and Plaintiffs that, 

subject to Court approval, Apple may have an extension of seven (7) days to file its reply in 

support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: September 19, 2016 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

By: /s/ Robert B. Hawk

Robert B. Hawk

Stacy Hovan

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

4085 Campbell Ave., Suite 100

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Tel.: 650.463.4000

Fax: 650.463.4199

Clayton C. James

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

1200 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1500

Denver, CO 80202

Tel: 303.899.7300

Fax: 303.899.7333

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 840 Filed 09/19/16 Page 2 of 5
HOGAN LOVELLS US

LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SILICON VALLEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPLE INC.’S REPLY

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

\\029613/000057 - 1699164 v2 

clay.james@hoganlovells.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

APPLE INC.

Dated: September 19, 2016 KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP

By: /s/ Michael von Loewenfeldt

James M. Wagstaffe (95535)

Michael von Loewenfeldt (178665)

Daniel J. Veroff (291492)

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP

101 Mission Street, 18th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

Tel.: 415-371-8500

Fax: 415-371-0500

wagstaffe@kerrwagstaffe.com

mvl@kerrwagstaffe.com

David M. Given

Nicholas A. Carlin

PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN & CARLIN LLP

39 Mesa Street, Ste. 201

San Francisco, CA 94129

Tel: 415-398-0900

Fax: 415-398-0911

dmg@phillaw.com

nac@phillaw.com

Interim Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

Carl F. Schwenker (admitted pro hac vice)

LAW OFFICES OF CARL F. SCHWENKER

The Haehnel Building

1101 East 11th Street

Austin, TX 78702

Tel: 512-480-8427

Fax: 512-857-1294

cfslaw@swbell.net

Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel

Jeff Edwards (admitted pro hac vice)

EDWARDS LAW

The Haehnel Building

1101 East 11th Street

Austin, TX 78702

Tel: 512-623-7727

Fax: 512-623-7729

jeff@edwards-law.com

Jennifer Sarnelli

GARDY & NOTIS, LLP

501 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1408

New York, NY 10017

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 840 Filed 09/19/16 Page 3 of 5
HOGAN LOVELLS US

LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SILICON VALLEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPLE INC.’S REPLY

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

\\029613/000057 - 1699164 v2 

Tel: 212-905-0509

Fax: 212-905-0508

jsarnelli@gardylaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR OPPERMAN PLAINTIFFS

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other 

signatories listed above.

Dated: September 19, 2016 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

By: /s/ Robert B. Hawk

Robert B. Hawk 

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 840 Filed 09/19/16 Page 4 of 5
HOGAN LOVELLS US

LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SILICON VALLEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPLE INC.’S REPLY

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-00453-JST

\\029613/000057 - 1699164 v2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the stipulation is 

hereby granted in this matter. Defendant Apple Inc. shall file its reply in support of its Motion for 

Partial Summary Judgment on or before October 3, 2016. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 19, 2016

____________________________

The Honorable Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-00453-JST Document 840 Filed 09/19/16 Page 5 of 5