Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-00280/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-00280-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Humberto Peraza-Jimenez,

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-14-00280-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

 Petitioner filed his Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 on May 19, 2014. Respondents filed their Limited Answer to Petitioner’s 

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on October 22, 2014 arguing the Petition was untimely 

and all the claims procedurally defaulted. Petitioner filed his reply on December 29, 2014. 

 On September 1, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and 

Recommendation recommending that the amended petition be denied and dismissed with 

prejudice because it is time-barred. In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate 

Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of 

the Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the 

Court. On September 18, 2015 Petitioner filed a letter requesting a 12 month extension. 

(Doc. 19) On September 24, 2015 the Court issued an Order extending the time for 

Petitioner to file his Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 

until November 1, 2015. The Court further Ordered that “No further extensions will be 

allowed absent extraordinary circumstances.” (Doc. 20) On October 13, 2015 the Court’s 

Order (Doc. 20) was returned by the Post Office with the notation “Return to Sender 

Case 2:14-cv-00280-SRB Document 22 Filed 11/03/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Attempted Not Known Unable to Forward.” It had been sent to the address provided by 

Plaintiff. On October 14, 2015 the Clerk’s Office resent the Court’s September 24, 2015 

Order to the address listed on Petitioner’s September 18, 2015 (Doc. 19) request for 

extension of time. That mail has not been returned. The extended time to file objections has 

expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is time-barred. 

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the order of this Court. (Doc. 18) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus and dismissing it with prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a 

plain and procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling 

debatable. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

 Dated this 3rd day of November, 2015. 

Case 2:14-cv-00280-SRB Document 22 Filed 11/03/15 Page 2 of 2