Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05285/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05285-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

4851-4094-4699.v1

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

PHILIP S. WARDEN (SBN 54752)

philip.warden@pillsburylaw.com

ANDREW D. LANPHERE (SBN 191479)

andrew.lanphere@pillsburylaw.com

JUDY J. BAO (SBN 305560)

judy.bao@pillsburylaw.com

Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 983-1000

Facsimile: (415) 983-1200

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STEPHEN A. FINN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

STEPHEN A. FINN

Plaintiff,

vs.

KELLEEN F. SULLIVAN, an individual; 

CAIREEN M.T. SULLIVAN, an individual; 

SEAN J. SULLIVAN, an individual; ROSS 

A. SULLIVAN, an individual; PHILOMENA 

MAUREEN SULLIVAN GILDEA, an 

individual; SULLIVAN VINEYARDS 

CORPORATION, a California corporation; 

SULLIVAN VINEYARDS PARTNERSHIP, 

a California partnership; and DOES 1 through 

10, inclusive. 

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-05285-WHO

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND DEADLINES FOR 

OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE

[DKT. 12]

Date: November 30, 2016

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick

Location Ctrm. 2, 17th Fl.

Plaintiff Stephen A. Finn (“Finn”) and Defendants Sullivan Vineyard Corporation and 

Sullivan Vineyard Partnership (“Defendants”), in accord with Rules 6-1 and 6-2 of the Local Rules 

for the United District Court for the Northern District of California, by and through their counsel of 

record, stipulate and agree as follows:

Case 3:16-cv-05285-WHO Document 18 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

4851-4094-4699.v1

WHEREAS, Defendants have filed a motion to stay or strike Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (“Motion to Strike”) [Dkt. 12]; 

WHEREAS, the Court has reset the hearing regarding Defendants’ Motion to Strike from 

November 23, 2016 to November 30, 2016 [Dkt. 16];

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to 

Strike filed on October 14, 2016 [Dkt. 12] is currently due on October 28, 2016;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(c), Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition is 

currently due on November 4, 2016;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants (collectively, the “Parties”) seek additional time to 

fully brief the issues presented in the Motion to Strike.

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and request the Court enter an order as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion to Strike will be due on November 7, 2016; and

2. Defendants’ Reply to the Opposition to the Motion to Strike will due on November 

18, 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 20, 2016.

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

Philip S. Warden

Andrew D. Lanphere

Judy J. Bao

By: _/s/ Andrew D. Lanphere

Attorney for Plaintiff Stephen A. Finn

BEYERS COSTIN SIMON

By: _/s/ Peter L. Simon_____________

Peter L. Simon

Attorney for Defendants Sullivan Vineyard 

Corporation and Sullivan Vineyard Partnership

Case 3:16-cv-05285-WHO Document 18 Filed 10/20/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

4851-4094-4699.v1

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in filing of this document has been 

obtained from its signatories.

By: _/s/ Andrew D. Lanphere___________

Case 3:16-cv-05285-WHO Document 18 Filed 10/20/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 4 -

4851-4094-4699.v1

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the stipulation of the parties is granted, as modified below:

1. Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Strike [Dkt. 12] shall be due on

November 1, 2016; and

2. Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Strike shall be 

due on November 15, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: October 20, 2016 ___________________________________

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-05285-WHO Document 18 Filed 10/20/16 Page 4 of 4