Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02237/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02237-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 130
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 28:1352 Miller Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

SAO

Lawrence T. Osuch, Esq. 

California Bar No.: 69249

Robert B. Gerard, Esq.

California Bar No.: 96296

GERARD & OSUCH, LLP

1516 Front Street

San Diego, California 92101

Telephone: (619) 232-2828

Facsimile: (619) 232-4129

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for

the use of, BULL FENCE, INC., a California

Corporation,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

RICO INC., a California Corporation, doing

business as Rico Painting & Construction;

MIGUEL ROBERTO GUITIERREZ RICO,

individually and doing business as Rico

Painting; KATHRYN B. ALLAN, an

individual; INDIVIDUAL SURETY, LTD., a

business organization, form unknown; DOE

INDIVIDUALS 1-20; and ROE BUSINESS 1-

20 or GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-20. 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: #2:06-CV-02237-DFL-GGH

STIPULATION AND ORDER

FOR AN EXTENSION OF 60 DAYS FOR

KATHRYN B. ALLAN TO ANSWER THE

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF 60 DAYS FOR KATHRYN B.

ALLAN TO ANSWER THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a) Plaintiff and Kathryn B. Allan of 5940 E. West

Miramar Dr., Tucson, Arizona (“Ms. Allan”) HEREBY STIPULATE to an

extension of not more than 30 days for Ms. Allan to answer the First Amended Complaint (the

“Complaint”).

Case 2:06-cv-02237-JAM-GGH Document 10 Filed 01/16/07 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In addition, pursuant to Local Rule 6-144(b), the Plaintiff and Ms. Allan HEREBY

STIPULATE and jointly petition the court for an additional 30 days for Ms. Allan to answer the

Complaint for a total extension of 60 days. As reasons therefore, the parties state as follows:

1. In late December 2006, a Summons and Complaint in the above referenced matter

were delivered to Kathryn B. Allan of 5940 E. West Miramar Drive., Tucson, Arizona, in an

attempt to affect service.

2. On January 2, 2007, a representative of Ms. Allan contacted Plaintiff’s counsel in an

effort to notify us that Ms. Allan was unfamiliar with the individuals and facts set forth in the

Complaint.

3. Ms. Allan provided Plaintiff’s counsel with an affidavit stating she is not the “Kathryn

B. Allan” described and identified in the Complaint despite sharing the same name with the

proper party. A copy of the Affidavit Ms. Allan provided is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

4. Accordingly, the parties request an extension of 30 days to investigate this matter and

ascertain whether or not the correct Kathryn B. Allan, who provided the surety at issue in the

Complaint, was served, and to allow her additional time to answer the Complaint accordingly.

5. In addition, should it be determined that the incorrect Kathryn B. Allan was served,

Plaintiffs request an additional 30 days, for a total extension of 60 days, to investigate, locate,

and serve the proper party defendant.

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff and Kathryn B. Allan of 5940 E. West Miramar Dr., Tucson,

Arizona jointly request that the Court allow this Stipulation and Proposed Order to investigate

the identity of the Kathryn B. Allan that was served, and allow additional time to locate the

proper party defendant should it be determined that service on this individual was in error.

//

Case 2:06-cv-02237-JAM-GGH Document 10 Filed 01/16/07 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

//

DATED this _____ day of January, 2007.

Respectfully submitted by:

_____________________ ____________________

Lawrence T. Osuch, Esq. Kathryn B. Allan

GERARD & OSUCH, LLP 5940 E. West Miramar Dr.

2840 South Jones Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85715

Building D, Suite 4 Pro Se

Las Vegas, Nevada 89146

Telephone: (702) 251-0093

Facsimile: (702) 251-0094

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 2:06-cv-02237-JAM-GGH Document 10 Filed 01/16/07 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

Pursuant to the Stipulation and Order between Plaintiff’s counsel and Kathryn B. Allan, it is

hereby ordered that an extension of 60 days be granted for Kathryn B. Allan to answer the

Complaint.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THIS 15 day of January, 2007.

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Respectfully Submitted by:

GERARD & OSUCH, LLP

_____________________________

Lawrence T. Osuch, Esq.

Nevada State Bar #006771

GERARD & OSUCH, LLP

2840 South Jones Blvd.

Building D, Suite 4

Las Vegas, Nevada 89146

Telephone: (702) 251-0093

Facsimile: (702) 251-0094

Case 2:06-cv-02237-JAM-GGH Document 10 Filed 01/16/07 Page 4 of 4