Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01362/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01362-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT HACKWORTH,

Plaintiff,

v.

E. AREVALOS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:19-cv-01362-ADA-CDB (PC)

ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT 

CONFERENCE FOR AUGUST 15, 2023,

AT 10:00 A.M. 

Plaintiff Robert Hackworth is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 

this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have indicated they believe a 

pretrial settlement conference would be productive and wish to participate in a settlement 

conference. Therefore, this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker to conduct 

a settlement conference.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. A settlement conference is scheduled to occur on August 15, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., 

before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. The conference shall be conducted via

Zoom videoconference. Defense counsel shall arrange for Plaintiff’s participation. 

The Zoom settlement conference invitation will be distributed the week prior, or 

counsel may contact Susan Hall, Courtroom Deputy for Judge Baker, at

SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Any difficulties concerning Zoom video conference, or

connecting to the Zoom video conference, shall immediately be reported to Susan 

Case 1:19-cv-01362-KES-CDB Document 93 Filed 06/09/23 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Hall. The Court will issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to allow for 

Plaintiff’s participation, as appropriate. 

2. Each party or a representative with full authority to negotiate and enter into a binding

settlement agreement shall participate in the conference. The failure of any counsel,

party, or authorized person subject to this order to participate in the conference may

result in the imposition of sanctions.

3. Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires thorough preparation prior

to the settlement conference. Participants in the conference must be prepared to discuss 

the claims, defenses, and damages.

4. The parties shall engage in informal settlement negotiations as follows:

No later than July 5, 2023, Plaintiff shall submit to Defendants, by mail, a written

itemization of damages and a meaningful settlement demand, including a brief

explanation of why such settlement is appropriate, which shall not exceed 5 pages. No 

later than July 19, 2023, Defendants shall respond, by mail or telephone, with an

acceptance of Plaintiff’s offer or a meaningful counteroffer, including a brief

explanation of why such settlement is appropriate. If settlement is achieved, the parties

shall file a Notice of Settlement as required by Local Rule 160.

5. If settlement is not achieved informally, the parties shall submit confidential

settlement conference statements no later than August 1, 2023. Defendants shall email

their statement to CDBorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff shall mail his statement,

clearly captioned, “Confidential Settlement Conference Statement,” to Office of the

Clerk, United States District Court, Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse, Room

1501, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 93721.

Once the parties have submitted their statements, they shall file a “Notice of 

Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement” with the Court. The 

confidential settlement conference statements themselves should not be filed with the 

Court nor served on the opposing party.

6. The confidential settlement conference statements should be no longer than 5 pages in

Case 1:19-cv-01362-KES-CDB Document 93 Filed 06/09/23 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

length and include:

a. A brief summary of the facts of the case;

b. A brief summary of the claims and defenses of the case, i.e., the statutory, 

constitutional, or other grounds upon which the claims are founded;

c. A forthright discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the case and an 

evaluation of the likelihood of prevailing on the claims or defenses, from the 

party’s perspective, and a description of the major issues in dispute;

d. An estimate of the party’s expected costs and time to be expended for further 

discovery, pretrial matters, and trial;

e. A summary of past settlement discussions, including the informal settlement 

negotiations required above; a statement of the party’s current position on 

settlement, including the amount the party would offer and accept to settle

(in specific dollar amounts); and a statement of the party’s expectations for 

settlement discussions;

f. An estimate of any restitution allocated to Plaintiff, or other financial 

obligation assigned to Plaintiff, that would affect the parties’ settlement 

discussions;

g. A list of the individuals who will be attending the conference on the party’s 

behalf, including names and, if appropriate, titles; and, 

h. If a party intends to discuss the settlement of any other actions or claims not 

raised in this suit, a brief description of each action or claim, including case 

number(s), as applicable. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to additionally serve a courtesy copy of this Order via 

email on the Litigation Coordinator at Plaintiff’s current facility. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2023 ___________________ _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-01362-KES-CDB Document 93 Filed 06/09/23 Page 3 of 3