Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01094/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01094-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1094

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

U.S. ATTORNEY, Technology (Illegal home business),

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District 

Judge. (1:15-cv-00009-CCB)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1094 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to 

state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we deny Randolph’s motions to amend and dismiss the appeal for

the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. U.S. 

Attorney, No. 1:15-cv-00009-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 9, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 15-1094 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 2