Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06414/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06414-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER 

 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 

Mohan Gil, et al, on behalf of others 

similarly situated, and on behalf of the 

general public, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Solectron Corporation, et al, 

 Defendants. 

 

Case No. C 07-06414 RMW (HRL) 

ORDER GRANTING FINAL 

APPROVAL TO THE STIPULATION OF 

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AND 

DISMISSING THE CASE WITH 

PREJUDICE 

This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Final Approval of the 

Stipulation of Settlement and Release (the “Stipulation of Settlement”). The Court previously 

granted preliminary approval of the settlement on December 23, 2009. 

Having reviewed the Stipulation of Settlement, and the parties’ arguments regarding the 

same, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ request for Final Approval of the Stipulation of 

Settlement. The Court further GRANTS the parties’ request for certification of the following 

Rule 23 settlement class: 

All persons who were or are employed by Solectron Corporation or Flextronics 

International USA, Inc., whether directly or through the temporary agency 

Aerotek, Inc., as non-exempt employees in assembly, refurbishing, testing, 

technician, or repair positions in the state of California from December 19, 2003, 

Case 5:07-cv-06414-RMW Document 229 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER 

-2- 

or in the state of Kentucky from December 19, 2002, through December 18, 2009, 

and who were required to wear Electro-Static Discharge equipment. 

The Court appoints Plaintiffs’ Counsel as Class Counsel. 

The Court further APPROVES the proposed allocation of Five Million Dollar 

($5,000,000.00) settlement fund, and APPROVES Class Counsel’s request for $1,205,750.75 in 

attorneys’ fees, APPROVES Class Counsel’s request for reimbursement of $40,776.50 in costs, 

APPROVES $136,220.51 in settlement administration costs, APPROVES named Plaintiff 

enhancements in the amount of $1,000.00 each for Mohan Gil, Rodney Carr, Tony Daniel, and 

Jermaine Wright, and APPROVES the Parties' Request for the deposit of $10,000.00 into a 

Contingency/Cy Pres Fund, to be used as outlined by the parties in their motion for final approval 

and according to the terms of the settlement agreement. All of the amounts enumerated in this 

paragraph are from and not in addition to the total settlement amount of $5,000,000.00. 

This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this case for the sole purpose of resolving any 

disputes associated with the implementation of the Stipulation of Settlement. For all other 

purposes, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

Dated: 6/4/10 ______________________________ 

 Hon. Ronald M. Whyte 

 United States District Court Judge

Case 5:07-cv-06414-RMW Document 229 Filed 06/04/10 Page 2 of 2