Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-2_05-cv-02138/USCOURTS-arwd-2_05-cv-02138-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FORT SMITH DIVISION

MARVIN J. HUMPHREY PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 05-2138

SHERIFF REED HAYES, MARGARET LEWIS,

MATT HAMILTON, RYAN CIAMPOI, JOSH ROSS,

DUSTIN BRADSHAW, DEREK NIETERT,

CHRIS MEAY, GARRETT GREEN,

JAMES HAMILTON, and MIKE HAMILTON DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Before this court are plaintiff’s motion for a court order for immediate court intervention,

motion for placement into federally protected custody, and motion for discovery. (Doc. 11, 14,

15). 

In a motion seeking immediate court intervention, plaintiff states he fears retaliation by

the defendants. He asks that the court enter an order ensuring that he remains safe from physical

and mental harm from the defendants or their colleagues employed by the Franklin County Adult

Detention Center. Plaintiff has not, however, alleged any facts to show that he is in danger. As

such, his motion is denied. 

Plaintiff has also filed a motion asking for the court to place him into federally supervised

custody. (Doc. 15). However, this court does not dictate to state and local authorities where

individuals charged with crimes or serving sentences should be housed. Therefore, the motion

is denied.

Finally, plaintiff has filed a motion for discovery requesting that the defendants produce

any and all audio and video taken by their surveillance equipment from May 19, 2005, until the

Case 2:05-cv-02138-RTD Document 34 Filed 10/19/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

-2-

present. However, discovery requests are not filed with the court. Therefore, the motion for

discovery is denied, and the defendants are hereby directed to treat this motion as a request for

production under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of October 2006.

/s/ Beverly Stites Jones

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-02138-RTD Document 34 Filed 10/19/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>