Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01886/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01886-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

ORDER RE: NOTICE OF ERRATA

Case No. 1:12-CV-01886-LJO-SKO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AT FRESNO

TRUSTEES OF THE WESTERN STATES 

INCOME SECURITY FUND and GRAPHIC 

COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 

UNION EMPLOYER RETIREMENT FUND,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN BLANCHFIELD, individually, and CA- JON, INC., doing business as Peerless Printers,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:12-CV-01886-LJO-SKO

ORDER RE: NOTICE OF ERRATA TO 

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER AND 

JUDGMENT AND STIPULATIONS FOR 

ENTRY OF ORDER AND JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs Trustees of the Western States Income Security Fund and Graphic Communications 

International Union Employer Retirement Fund (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a Notice of Errata and 

Request for Correction of Error in Stipulation for Entry of Order and Judgment along with the 

supporting Declaration of Vishtasp Soroushian. Plaintiffs note that the name “John David 

Blanchfield,” rather than “John Blanchfield” was inadvertently inserted once in the body of a 

Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Order, filed on April 5, 2013, which served as the basis for the 

Court’s Order and Judgment (“Judgment”). Similarly, the name “John David Blanchfield,” rather 

than “John Blanchfield” inadvertently appeared in the caption of the Notice of Entry of Order and 

Judgment (“Notice”) of that Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Order (“Stipulation”).

Notably, at the time the errors were made, John David Blanchfield was no longer a defendant 

to this action. Rather, John Blanchfield had been named a defendant. Next, John Blanchfield, and 

not John David Blanchfield, signed the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Order which served as 

the basis for the Court’s Judgment. Through the Stipulation, the parties agreed for the Court to 

render judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants pursuant to the terms of the parties’ 

Settlement Agreements and Payment Plans (“Agreements”). These Agreements were filed with this 

Court on April 2, 2013, and they were entered into and signed by John Blanchfield, individually and 

on behalf of defendant CA-JON, INC., doing business as Peerless Printers. John David Blanchfield 

Case 1:12-cv-01886-LJO-SKO Document 52 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 2
ORDER RE: NOTICE OF ERRATA

Case No. 1:12-CV-01886-LJO-SKO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

was not a party to those Agreements. Finally, John Blanchfield has been served with all the relevant

filings in this case, including the Notice and both the original and amended complaints and 

summonses, and the abstracts of judgment and writ of execution were requested and issued against 

Defendant John Blanchfield. It is apparent that the parties intended for, and only had the power to, 

enter into the Stipulation between the Plaintiffs and true Defendants to the action.

Accordingly, the Court finds good cause to accept Plaintiffs’ errata to the Notice, removing 

the name “David” from the case caption, and to accept the errata to the Stipulation, removing the 

name “David” from line 23. The Court’s Order and Judgment, issued April 5, 2013, is amended to 

reflect this clarification. (F.R.C.P., Rule 60(a).)

SO ORDERED

Dated: January 29, 2015

 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

United States District Judge

Case 1:12-cv-01886-LJO-SKO Document 52 Filed 01/30/15 Page 2 of 2