Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02709/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-02709-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

- 1 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Prodata MicroElectronics, Inc., a California 

corporation,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

4Access Communications Co., a Delaware 

corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:06-CV-02709-JM (RBB) 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO 

DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE

 This matter comes before the Court pursuant to a joint motion following stipulation of the 

parties to dismiss this entire action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court, having considered the joint motion and the files and 

records in this matter, and good cause appearing, hereby grants the parties’ joint motion and orders 

as follows: 

 1. This entire action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

Case 3:06-cv-02709-JM-RBB Document 57 Filed 05/05/08 Page 1 of 2
____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

- 2 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. The Court shall and does retain jurisdiction to enter judgment in this matter against 

defendant and counterclaim plaintiff 4Access Communications Company (“4Access”) pursuant to 

a Stipulation for Entry of Judgment among the parties in the event 4Access does not timely make a 

second settlement payment pursuant to the parties’ settlement. 

The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close the file. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 5, 2008 

 Jeffrey T. Miller, United States District Judge 

 

Jeffrey T. Miller, United States District Ju

Case 3:06-cv-02709-JM-RBB Document 57 Filed 05/05/08 Page 2 of 2