Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02042/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02042-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER – CASE NO. 3:05-CV-02042 CRB 

SF1 1433571v.1

Geoffrey M. Ezgar (SBN 184243) 

gezgar@sidley.com 

Robert B. Martin, III (SBN 235489) 

rbmartin@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Michael C. Kelley (SBN 090062) 

mkelley@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 West Fifth Street, 40th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90013 

Telephone: (213) 896-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 

Attorneys For Defendant 

KPMG LLP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PRENA SMAJLAJ, Individually and On Behalf 

of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC., GREGORY L. REYES and ANTONIO 

CANOVA, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 

Case No. 3:05-CV-02042 CRB 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 178 Filed 05/08/06 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER – CASE NO. 3:05-CV-02042 CRB 

SF1 1433571v.1

STIPULATION 

WHEREAS, by stipulation dated April 13, 2006, the parties (with the exception of 

KPMG LLP which had not yet been named as a defendant in this action) agreed to a proposed 

briefing schedule and hearing date for the defendants’ motions to dismiss; 

WHEREAS, the Court approved the proposed schedule by order dated April 14, 2006 

(the “Scheduling Order”); 

WHEREAS, KPMG LLP was first named in this action and served with the 

consolidated class action complaint after entry of the Scheduling Order; 

WHEREAS, KPMG’s counsel, Geoffrey M. Ezgar, has a pre-paid family vacation 

which directly conflicts with the aforementioned schedule; 

WHEREAS, the parties, now including KPMG, have agreed to amend the schedule to 

accommodate KPMG’s counsel; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, 

subject to approval of the Court, that the schedule for the defendants’ motions to dismiss the 

consolidated class action complaint shall be as follows: 

Defendants’ Motions Due: June 23, 2006 

Plaintiff’s Oppositions Due: August 21, 2006 

Defendants’ Replies Due: September 21, 2006 

Hearing on Defendants’ Motions: October 20, 2006 at 10:00 a.m., or such other 

date and time as the Court deems appropriate 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar 

Dated: May 3, 2006 

Geoffrey M. Ezgar 

Robert B. Martin, III 

Attorneys For Defendant KPMG LLP 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 178 Filed 05/08/06 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER – CASE NO. 3:05-CV-02042 CRB 

SF1 1433571v.1

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: 650-493-9300 

Facsimile: 650-565-5100 

By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar with permission of 

Dated: May 3, 2006 

Nina F. Locker 

Steven D. Guggenheim 

Attorneys For Defendant 

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & 

FLOM LLP 

300 South Grand, Suite 3400 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: 213-687-5000 

Facsimile: 213-687-5600 

By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar with permission of 

Dated: May 3, 2006 

Richard Marmaro 

Jack DiCanio 

Attorneys For Defendant 

Gregory Reyes 

HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

275 Middlefield Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: 650-324-7000 

Facsimile: 650-324-0638 

By: /s/ Alexander Lyon 

Dated: May 3, 2006 

Norman Blears 

Alexander Lyon 

Attorneys For Defendant 

Antonio Canova 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 178 Filed 05/08/06 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER – CASE NO. 3:05-CV-02042 CRB 

SF1 1433571v.1

NIX, PATTERSON & ROACH, LLP 

205 Linda Drive 

Daingerfield, TX 75638 

Telephone: 903-645-7333 

Facsimile: 903-645-4415 

By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar with permission of 

Dated: May 3, 2006 

Bradley E. Beckworth 

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the 

Proposed Class 

 PATTON, ROBERTS, MCWILLIAMS & 

CAPSHAW, LLP 

Century Bank Plaza 

2900 St. Michael Drive, Suite 400 

Texarkana, TX 75505-6128 

Telephone: 903-334-7000 

Facsimile: 903-330-7007 

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the 

Proposed Class 

KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 

555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1501 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415-772-4700 

Facsimile: 415-772-4707 

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the 

Proposed Class 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 178 Filed 05/08/06 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 5 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER – CASE NO. 3:05-CV-02042 CRB 

SF1 1433571v.1

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the 

foregoing Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., 

I hereby attest that each of the other signatories has concurred in this filing. 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar 

Dated: May 3, 2006 

Geoffrey M. Ezgar 

SIDLEY & AUSTIN LLP

555 California Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1715 

Telephone: 415-772-1200 

Facsimile: 415-772-7400 

Attorneys For Defendant KPMG LLP 

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 178 Filed 05/08/06 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER – CASE NO. 3:05-CV-02042 CRB 

SF1 1433571v.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the schedule for the 

defendants’ response to the consolidated complaint shall be as follows: 

Defendants’ Motions Due: June 23, 2006 

Plaintiff’s Oppositions Due: August 21, 2006 

Defendants’ Replies Due: September 21, 2006 

Hearing on Defendants’ Motions: October 20, 2006 at 10:00 a.m., or such other 

date and time as the Court deems appropriate 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May ____, 2006 

 THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

 United States District Court Judge 

08

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02042-CRB Document 178 Filed 05/08/06 Page 6 of 6