Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05445/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05445-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT D. GIBSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WARDEN OF CORCORAN STATE

PRISON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-05445-OWW-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 44)

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(Docs, 36, 39, 40, 43)

Plaintiff, Robert D. Gibson (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 6, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. On

May 19, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time. On June

16, 2005, the court granted plaintiff an additional thirty (30)

Case 1:03-cv-05445-LJO -DLB Document 65 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

days within which to respond. To date, plaintiff has not filed

objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 6, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief,

filed February 28, 2005, March 11, 2005, March 22, 2005, and May

2, 2005, are DENIED, without prejudice, as PREMATURE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 11, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05445-LJO -DLB Document 65 Filed 10/31/05 Page 2 of 2