Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04113/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-04113-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED 

 Page 1 No. 5:15-cv-00300 RMW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Richard H. Friedman (CA Bar No. 221622) 

rfriedman@friedmanrubin.com 

Peter J. Mullenix (admitted pro hac vice) 

pmullenix@friedmanrubin.com 

Friedman | Rubin 

51 University Street, Suite 201 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Tel: 206-501-4446 

Fax: 206-623-0794 

John Graham Hill (admitted pro hac vice) 

ghill2013@gmail.com 

2323 S. Shepherd Drive, 14th Floor 

Houston TX 77019 

Tel: 713-979-4695 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

GERALD DARRINGER and CAROL 

DARRINGER, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., 

 Defendant. 

No. 5:15-cv-00300 RMW 

[PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR 

PLAINTIFF POHLY TO RESPOND TO

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD 

BE RELATED 

RICHARD POHLY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., a Delaware 

corporation headquartered in California, 

Defendant. 

No. 5:15-cv-04113 PSG 

[PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR 

PLAINTIFF POHLY TO RESPOND TO

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD 

BE RELATED 

THE COURT, having considered the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Extend Deadline for 

Plaintiff Pohly to Respond to Intuitive Surgical, Inc.’s Administration Motion to Consider 

Whether Cases Should Be Related, rules as follows: 

Case 3:15-cv-04113-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 2
 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED 

 Page 2 No. 5:15-cv-00300 RMW 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiff Pohly to Respond to Intuitive 

Surgical, Inc.’s Administration Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related is extended 

to December 11, 2015. 

DONE IN OPEN COURT this ____ day of November, 2015. 

 

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

United States District Court Judge 

23

Case 3:15-cv-04113-MEJ Document 23 Filed 11/23/15 Page 2 of 2