Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02660/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02660-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN HOGAN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-03-2660 LKK JFM

vs.

JIM HAMLETT, Warden, et al.

Respondent. ORDER

 /

By this court’s previous order, petitioner’s objections to the magistrate judge’s Findings

and Recommendations were due on January 20, 2007.

By this request, and for the reasons stated below, petitioner is requesting a sixty day

extension of time, up to and including March 20, 2007, within which to file objections.

The undersigned is presently in trial in the matter of People v. Karis, the retrial of a 25

year old death penalty case. Jury selection had begun on December 4, 2006, but for a number of

reasons ended on January 19, 2007, with a new panel of jurors to be called on February 13, 2007. 

In addition, the undersigned began trial in the matter of United States v. Maddox, Cr. S-03-

00371, on January 9, 2007. That trial will not conclude until the week of January 22, 2007, at the

earliest. Thereafter, the undersigned is scheduled to return to the Karis matter to resolve still

pending motions and other issues.

For the aforesaid reasons petitioner’s objections to the magistrate’s Findings and

Case 2:03-cv-02660-LKK -JFM Document 29 Filed 01/31/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Recommendations have not yet been completed. The undersigned recognizes that this requested

second extension of time is lengthy, but submits that it is necessary.

On January 19, 2007, I contacted respondent’s counsel and she agreed to my request.

Petitioner remains in the custody of the California Department of Corrections serving his

term of sentence.

For all of the above stated reasons, petitioner requests an extension of time, up to and

including March 20, 2007, within which to file his objections.

Dated: January 19, 2007

Respectfully submitted;

 /S/ Michael S. Bigelow 

Attorney for Petitioner

ORDER

For the reasons stated above, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED

that objections to the Findings and Recommendations may be filed on or before March 20, 2007. 

Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within ten days after

service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 30, 2007.

13 Hogan.2660.F&Rreply.eot.157

Case 2:03-cv-02660-LKK -JFM Document 29 Filed 01/31/07 Page 2 of 2