Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02959/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02959-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RUDY AROCHA,

Plaintiff,

v.

E. SAUCEDA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:11-cv-2959 KJN P 

ORDER

 On August 26, 2013, defendants Miranda, Abshire, Alziebler, Hernandez and Pagala filed 

a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) and 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has 

not opposed the motion. 

 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 

opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 

the granting of the motion . . . .” On June 11, 2013, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for 

filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a 

waiver of opposition to the motion. 

 Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for 

imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of 

the Court.” In the order filed June 13, 2013, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with the 

Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. 

Case 2:11-cv-02959-MCE-KJN Document 78 Filed 09/26/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one days of the 

date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss. Failure to file 

an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

Dated: September 25, 2013 

ar2959.osc 

Case 2:11-cv-02959-MCE-KJN Document 78 Filed 09/26/13 Page 2 of 2