Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00792/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00792-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

The United States Postal Service returned the order served on Petitioner on November 14, 2005, as undeliverable.

A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Not in Custody. However, Petitioner has not notified the court of

any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(d).

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YAHIAOUI OUALID BEN TOUMI, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

JOHN ASHCROFT, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:05-cv-00792-AWI-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 9)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On November 1, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that this action be DISMISSED based on Petitioner's

failure to obey the court's order of August 16, 2005. The Findings

and Recommendations was served on Petitioner and contained notice

that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from

the date of service of that order. To date, Petitioner has not

filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.1

Case 1:05-cv-00792-AWI -SMS Document 11 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations is supported by

the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 1, 2005,

is ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED based on Petitioner's failure to

obey the court's order of August 16, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 20, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00792-AWI -SMS Document 11 Filed 12/20/05 Page 2 of 2