Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-00743/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-00743-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 All other known Defendants named in the First Amended Complaint were dismissed with

prejudice on November 11, 2006. (Doc. # 11.)

1 06cv743

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANTIC ASHANTI’S CAUSE, SUING ON

BEHALF OF THEODORE A. PINNOCK

AND ITS MEMBERS; and THEODORE A.

PINNOCK, An Individual,

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 06-CV-743 WQH (WMc)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

vs.

HANNAH-GILLARD MIRAMAR ROAD

PLANNED INDUSTRIAL

DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, and

DOES 1 THROUGH 10,

Defendants.

HAYES, Judge:

On September 1, 2006, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint in the instant matter,

naming, for the first time, Hannah-Gillard Miramar Road Development Association (“HannahGillard”) as a Defendant.1

 (Doc. # 10.) No proof of service has been filed as to Defendant HannahGillard. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides, in pertinent part:

If service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days

after the filing of the complaint, the court, upon motion or on its own initiative after

notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action without prejudice as to that defendant

or direct that service be effected within a specified time; provided that if the plaintiff

shows good cause for the failure, the court shall extend the time for service for an

appropriate period.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 

Case 3:06-cv-00743-WQH-WMC Document 13 Filed 03/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 06cv743

On January 24, 2007, this Court issued an “Order to Show Cause” (Doc. # 12), which stated

in part:

Pursuant to Rule 4(m), this Order constitutes notice to Plaintiff that the Court will

dismiss this action without prejudice on or after February 23, 2007, unless, no later

than that date, Plaintiff files (1) a proof of service of summons and the First Amended

Complaint to Defendant Hannah-Gillard; or (2) a declaration under penalty of perjury

showing good cause for failure to timely serve Defendant Hannah-Gillard with the

summons and First Amended Complaint.

(Order to Show Cause at 1-2 (emphasis in original).) Since the Court issued the Order to Show Cause,

nothing has been filed in this action. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 4(m), this action is hereby

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 1, 2007

WILLIAM Q. HAYES

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-00743-WQH-WMC Document 13 Filed 03/01/07 Page 2 of 2