Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-04039/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-04039-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1330 Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING Case No. 3:18-cv-04039

SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Rebecca Grey (State Bar No. 194940)

grey@greylaw-sf.com

THE GREY LAW FIRM, PC

177 Post Street, Suite 750

San Francisco, California 94108

Telephone: (415) 262-9926

Facsimile: (415) 262-9981

Attorney for Plaintiff,

THERESA HONG, M.D.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THERESA HONG, M.D.,

Plaintiff,

v.

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY

Defendant.

Case No. 3:18-cv-04039

(Honorable Jon S. Tigar)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Hearing Date: October 25, 2018

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Courtroom: 9

Complaint Filed: July 6, 2018

Case 3:18-cv-04039-JST Document 15 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING Case No. 3:18-cv-04039

SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Rule 6-1(b) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of California, Plaintiff Theresa Hong, M.D. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 

AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, 

hereby stipulate to modify the existing briefing schedule by extending the date for the filing of 

Plaintiff’s Opposition and Defendant’s Reply by ten days. The proposed modification will not 

affect the hearing date, nor will it shorten the time between the briefing and the hearing date to 

less than statutory notice. 

Defendant served its Motion to Dismiss on August 27, 2018. Under Local Rule 7-3(a) and 

the Court’s Standing Order, Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is due on or before 5 

pm on September 10, 2018 and Defendant’s Reply is due on or before 5 pm on September 17, 

2018.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff has requested, and Defendant has agreed to extend 

the filing dates for the Opposition and the Reply by ten days such that Plaintiff’s Opposition is 

due on September 20, 2018 and Defendant’s Reply is due on October 4, 2018 (both by 5pm). 

The hearing date of October 25, 2018 will remain.

Good cause exists for this modification for the following reasons: On September 7, 

Plaintiff’s counsel discovered that the draft Opposition to Defendant’s motion had been 

“corrupted” and that her work product was lost. Plaitiff’s counsel is unable to recreate the 

Opposition by the current September 10 deadline. Plaintiff’s counsel proposes, and Defendant’s 

counsel courteously agrees, to extend the filing dates for both the Opposition and Reply in order 

to provide Plaintiff’s counsel with sufficient time to prepare an Opposition. The agreed upon 

dates also take into consideration defense counsel’s current schedule and commitments and 

maintain the standard notice for the Court’s review in advance of the hearing.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 3:18-cv-04039-JST Document 15 Filed 09/11/18 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING Case No. 3:18-cv-04039

SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Dated: September 7, 2018 THE GREY LAW FIRM, P.C.

By: /s/ Rebecca Grey

Rebecca Grey

Attorney for Plaintiff

THERESA HONG

Dated: September 7, 2018 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

By: /s/ Misty A. Murray

Martin E. Rosen

Misty A. Murray

Attorneys for Defendant

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY

Signature Attestation

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(a), I hereby certify that the content of this document is 

acceptable to Misty A. Murray, counsel for Defendant, and that I have obtained Ms. Murray’s 

authorization to affix his electronic signature to this document.

/s/ Rebecca Grey

Rebecca Grey

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to Dismiss is extended from 

September 10, 2018 to September 20, 2018.

2. The deadline for Defendant to reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss is 

extended from September 17, 2018 to October 4, 2018.

DATED:

_________________________

JON. S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

September 11, 2018

Case 3:18-cv-04039-JST Document 15 Filed 09/11/18 Page 3 of 3