Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01134/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-01134-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUSSELL BERNARDINI,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1134 FCD GGH PS

vs.

JAMES WALKER, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed November 16, 2009, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

return to the court, within twenty-eight days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on

defendants. That twenty-eight day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any

way to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:09-cv-01134-FCD-GGH Document 9 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 21, 2010

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

bernardini.fusm

Case 2:09-cv-01134-FCD-GGH Document 9 Filed 01/21/10 Page 2 of 2