Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00869/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00869-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 330
Nature of Suit: Federal Employers' Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAREN M. TAYLOR,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-0869 JAM DAD PS

v.

MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary ORDER SETTING STATUS

of the United States Air Force, (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

Defendant.

 /

Defendant has filed an answer to plaintiff’s Title VII and Rehabilitation Act

claims. Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS

ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, May 7, 2010, at

11:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 27, before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.

2. All parties are required to appear at the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference

either by counsel or, if acting without counsel, in propria persona. Any party may appear at the

conference telephonically. To arrange telephonic appearance, the party shall contact Pete Buzo,

the courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than three

days before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference.

/////

Case 2:08-cv-00869-JAM-DAD Document 44 Filed 03/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before April 23, 2010, and

defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before April 30, 2010. Each party’s status

report shall address all of the following matters:

a. Possible joinder of additional parties;

b. Proposed amendments to plaintiff’s first amended

complaint;

c. Jurisdiction and venue;

d. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

e. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof,

including disclosure of expert witnesses;

f. Future proceedings, including the setting of

appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and law and

motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial

conference and trial;

g. Modification of standard pretrial procedures

specified by the rules due to the relative simplicity

or complexity of the action;

h. Whether the case is related to any other case,

including matters in bankruptcy;

i. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate

judge assigned to this matter acting as settlement

judge, waiving any disqualifications by virtue of his

so acting, or whether they prefer to have a

Settlement Conference before another judge;

j. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed

before a United States Magistrate Judge; and

k. Any other matters that may aid in the just and

expeditious disposition of this action.

DATED: March 10, 2010.

DAD:kw

Ddad1\orders.prose\taylor0869.ossc

Case 2:08-cv-00869-JAM-DAD Document 44 Filed 03/11/10 Page 2 of 2