Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00681/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00681-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK MUNNS, et al., No. 2:10-cv-00681-MCE-EFB 

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER

HILLARY DIANE RODHAM CLINTON,

et al.,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

On July 17, 2012, this Court issued a Minute Order ordering

Plaintiffs to show cause (“OSC”) why this case should not be

dismissed for failure to adhere with Eastern District of

California Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

and/or the orders of this Court. Plaintiffs’ counsel

subsequently responded to that OSC advising the Court of the

circumstances giving rise to his failure to comply with the

applicable rules and this Court’s Orders. Good cause having been

shown, the Court declines to impose sanctions at this time. 

///

///

1

Case 2:10-cv-00681-MCE-EFB Document 69 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court is also in receipt, however, of Plaintiffs’ Notice

of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendants Lloyd’s of London

(“Lloyd’s”) and CAN Financial Corporation (“CAN Financial”), the

only remaining Defendants in this action. Accordingly, Lloyd’s

and CAN Financial are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(I), and the Clerk

of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 20, 2012

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 2:10-cv-00681-MCE-EFB Document 69 Filed 08/20/12 Page 2 of 2