Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-2_05-cv-02135/USCOURTS-arwd-2_05-cv-02135-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FORT SMITH DIVISION

JOYCE ANN JAMES PLAINTIFF

v. CIVIL NO. 05-2135

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner

Social Security Administration DEFENDANT

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On September 9, 2005, plaintiff filed a complaint with this court after being denied

disability benefits. (Doc. #1 ). After failing to timely serve, an Order, dated July 7, 2006, was

filed directing plaintiff to show cause why the action against the defendant should not be

dismissed. (Doc. #3). Plaintiff’s response, dated July 7, 2006, indicating she has been granted

benefits by the defendant is construed as a voluntary motion to dismiss the case. (Doc. # 4).

Accordingly, we recommend dismissing plaintiff's case with prejudice. 

The parties have ten days from receipt of our report and recommendation in which

to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely

objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are

reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the

district court. 

DATED this 24 day of July 2006. th

/s/ Beverly Stites Jones 

HON. BEVERLY STITES JONES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-02135-RTD Document 5 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>