Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01108/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01108-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and Order to Amend Scheduling Order - Case No. 2:06-CV-01108-LKK-GGH Page 1

Dennis C Huie (State Bar No. 184377)

HANNA, BROPHY, MacLEAN, McALEER & JENSEN, LLP

155 Grand Avenue, Suite 600

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: 510 - 839-1180 

Fax: 510 - 839-4804

Email: dhuie@hannabrophy.com

D. Pat McAleer (State Bar No. 82499)

HANNA, BROPHY, MacLEAN, McALEER & JENSEN, LLP

310 Hemsted Drive, Suite 300

Redding, CA 96049

Telephone: 530-223-6010

Fax: 530-223-0813

Email: pmcaleer@hannabrophy.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Holiday Harbor, Inc. and Stephen Barry

David Weintraub (State Bar No. 73841)

Sarah Sandford-Smith Batt (State Bar No. 237967)

BEESON, TAYER & BODINE, PC

1404 Franklin Street, 5th floor

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: 510-625-9700

Fax: 510-625-8275

Email: dweintraub@beesontayer.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Cynthia Genaro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION

CYNTHIA GENARO,

 Plaintiff(s),

vs.

HOLIDAY HARBOR RESORT &

MARINA; STEVEN BARRY; and DOES 1-

20, inclusive, 

 Defendant(s).

Case No. 2:06-CV-01108-LKK-GGH

STIPULATION AND ORDER

AMENDING PRETRIAL

SCHEDULING ORDER

Case 2:06-cv-01108-LKK -GGH Document 37 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and Order to Amend Scheduling Order - Case No. 2:06-CV-01108-LKK-GGH Page 2

THE STIPULATION

Defendants Holiday Harbor, Inc. and Steve Barry, and plaintiff Cynthia Genaro, by and

through their respective attorneys of record, (“the Parties”) hereby stipulate to amending the

Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order, issued July 25, 2006, and as amended by the Court’s July 26,

2007 minute order, as follows.

1. The deadline to designate experts will be continued from May 9, 2007, to June 8,

2007.

2. All other dates in the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order will remain intact.

GOOD CAUSE

The Parties set forth the following facts demonstrating good cause to the continue the

above deadlines.

1. The Parties recently agreed to mediate this case with mediator Gail Killefer. The

first available date for all parties and the mediator is May 8, 2007. Because of the

mediation, the Parties agreed to continue Plaintiff’s taking of three depositions

that were scheduled for April 10, April 18, and April 24, of Holiday Harbor

employees. The continuation of these depositions is necessary so that the Parties

can prepare for mediation, and to avoid further added expense and fees in

litigating this case which would be counter-productive in reaching a settlement of

this action. The Parties are also expected to designate expert witnesses by May 9,

2007. To avoid the expense of retaining experts before going into mediation and

taking further discovery which may prove to be both counterproductive to

settlement and unnecessary if this case resolves at mediation, the Parties request

that the expert disclosure date be continued.

2. The Parties have been diligent in pursuing discovery. The parties have exchanged

initial disclosures and all parties have propounded and responded to written

Case 2:06-cv-01108-LKK -GGH Document 37 Filed 04/30/07 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and Order to Amend Scheduling Order - Case No. 2:06-CV-01108-LKK-GGH Page 3

discovery which includes interrogatories and requests for production of

documents. Plaintiff also propounded requests for admission which were

responded to by Defendant Holiday Harbor. After the exchange of initial

disclosures and written discovery, Defendants took Plaintiff’s deposition which

took one and one-half day to complete. Similarly, Plaintiff has taken the

deposition of Steve Barry which took one and one-half days to complete. The

Parties have clearly been diligent in moving this case forward. 

Based on the facts set forth above, the Parties respectfully request that the Court amend

the Pretrial Scheduling Order in accordance with the Parties’ stipulation.

DATED: April 23, 2007 HANNA, BROPHY, MacLEAN, McALEER and

JENSEN, LLP

By: /s/ 

Dennis C. Huie

Attorneys for Defendants

DATED: April 12, 2007 BEESON, TAYER & BODINE, P.C.

By: /s/ 

David Weintraub

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 2:06-cv-01108-LKK -GGH Document 37 Filed 04/30/07 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and Order to Amend Scheduling Order - Case No. 2:06-CV-01108-LKK-GGH Page 4

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby grants the

Parties’ request to amend the Pretrial Scheduling Order as follows:

1. The deadline to designate experts will be continued from May 9, 2007, to June 8,

2007.

2. All other dates in the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order will remain intact.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 27, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-01108-LKK -GGH Document 37 Filed 04/30/07 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

 [CCP § 1013, C.R.C. § 2008, F.R.C.P. Rule 5]

I, Dennis C Huie, state:

My business address is Hanna, Brophy, MacLean, McAleer & Jensen, LLP, 155 Grand

Avenue, Suite 600, Oakland, CA 94612. I am employed in the County of Alameda, State of

California where this service occurs. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this

action. On the date set forth below, I served the forgoing document described as: 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND PRETRIAL

SCHEDULING ORDER

on the following person(s) in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope

addressed as follows:

David Weintraub 

Beeson, Tayer & Bodine, PC 

1404 Franklin Street, 5th Floor 

Oakland, CA 94612 

_____ BY FIRST CLASS MAIL: I am readily familiar with this firm's practice for the collection

and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, to-wit,

that correspondence will be deposited with the United States Postal Service this same day

in the ordinary course of business. I sealed said envelope and placed it for collection and

mailing this date, following ordinary business practices.

_____ BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand this date to

the offices of the addressee(s).

_____ BY OVERNIGHT MAIL: I caused such envelope to be delivered by a commercial carrier

service for overnight delivery to the office(s) of the addressee(s).

_____ BY FACSIMILE: I caused said document to be transmitted by Facsimile machine to the

number indicated after the address(es) noted above.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing

is true and correct. Executed at Oakland, California, on:

 

(Date) Dennis C Huie

OKE00005|2002.DOC

Case 2:06-cv-01108-LKK -GGH Document 37 Filed 04/30/07 Page 5 of 5