Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03313/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03313-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

W <h» \_fW JE.VJ*^vl't3 p.l

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

imtSi.MSHOei.SQw

>nMiilnMini ruaruii in

«&£••«*• StM*

ERIC A. GROVER, Bar No. 136080

KELLER GROVER LLP

425 Second Street, Suite 500

San Francisco., CA 94107

Telephone: (415) 543-1305

Facsimile: (415)543-7861

SOFUA VERZICH, Bar No. 221602

LITTLER MENDELSON

A Professional Corporation

650 California Street, 20th Floor

San Francisco, California 94108-2693

Telephone: (415)433-1940

Facsimile: (415)399-8490

Attorneys for Defendant

THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.

DANIEL RAY BACON, Bar No. 103866

AARON S. GORFEIN, Bar No. 183295

LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL RAY BACON

234 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, California 94102-4515

Telephone: (415)864-0907

Facsimile: (415) 864-0989

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SHERRI RAHMANI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Sherri Rahmani,

Plaintiff,

v.

Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., a Delaware

corporation,

Defendant..

Case No. C04-03313VRW

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Stipulated Order of Dismissal Case No. C04-03313 VRW

Case 3:04-cv-03313-VRW Document 60 Filed 11/07/06 Page 1 of 2
p.2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

g

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 I

urns? MENOSLSON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO, by and

between their respective counsel of record, that all claims presented by Plaintiff Sherri Rahmani is

her Complaint for Damages which were not dismissed pursuant to the Court's October 2,2006 Order

granting and denying in part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative,

Partial Summary Judgment (specifically, the remaining portion of Plaintiffs California Labor Code

Section 201 (a) claim regarding the alleged "loss prevention award of approximately $300 and the

alleged remaining balance on Plaintiffs gift card of $30-40") shall be dismissed with prejudice. The

parties have reached a settlement of this remaining claim. No party is entitled to file a bill of costs

or request for attorneys' fees related to this particular portion of the lawsuit, which is dismissed

pursuant to the instant stipulation and settlement between the parties.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: November ^3 2006 KELLER OROVER LLP

£A6ro^

Dated: November ;? ,2006

By: ERIC A. GROVER

Attorney for Defendant

The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.

LAW OFFICES OF DANTE BACON

By:;DANIELtorrBACON

Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

Fim«wide:8!63SS68.1 <M2«36.1022

Stipulated Order of Dismissal

The Honorable VAUGHN R. WALKER

United States District Court Judge

2. Case No- C04-O3313 VRW

November 7, 2006

Case 3:04-cv-03313-VRW Document 60 Filed 11/07/06 Page 2 of 2