Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-md-01654/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-md-01654-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

M:05-cv-01654-PJH 

STIPULATION TO LIFT ALL STAYS FOR THE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION MATTERS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

COUNSEL OF RECORD 

LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE: COMPRESSION LABS, INC. PATENT 

LITIGATION. 

C 05-1654 PJH 

Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton 

STIPULATION TO LIFT ALL STAYS FOR THE 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION MATTERS. 

 AND ORDER

Case 5:05-md-01654-JF Document 56 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 7
M:05-cv-01654-PJH 

STIPULATION TO LIFT ALL STAYS FOR THE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION MATTERS 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO LIFT ALL STAYS FOR THE MULTIDISTRICT 

LITIGATION MATTERS. 

WHEREAS, the following cases have been transferred to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1407, as set forth in the Multidistrict Litigation Panel Order dated February 16, 2005 or have been 

transferred on a conditional transfer order dated March 28, 2005 for pretrial purposes: 

Compression Labs, Inc. v. Agfa Corp. et al., 2:04-CV-158-DF (E.D. Tex.) (“the Agfa case”); 

Compression Labs, Inc. v. Dell Inc. et al., 2:04-CV-159-DF (E.D. Tex.) (“the Dell case”); 

Compression Labs, Inc. v. Acer America Corp. et al., 2:04-CV-294-DF (E.D. Tex.) (“the Acer

case”); Compression Labs, Inc. v. Creo, Inc., et al., 2:04-CV-410-DF (E.D. Tex.) (the “Creo

case”); Agfa Corp. et al. v. Compression Labs, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 04-818 (SLR) (D. Del.); 

Yahoo! Inc. v. Compression Labs, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 07-918 (SLR) (D. Del.); Audiovox Corp. et 

al. v. Compression Labs, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 04-1293 (D. Del.); Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. 

Compression Labs, Inc., Case No. 5:04-CV-3124 (PJH) (N.D. Cal.); and Google Inc. v. 

Compression Labs, Inc. et al., Case No. 04-CV-3934 (CW) (N.D. Cal.) (collectively the 

“Multidistrict Litigation Matters”); 

WHEREAS, the parties to all Multidistrict Litigation Matters consolidated before this Court 

have agreed to have all cases proceed through pretrial proceedings simultaneously in these 

Multidistrict Litigation Proceedings; and 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to lift any and all stays of action entered by the 

originating Courts in the Multidistrict Litigation Matters to permit all matters to move forward with 

discovery and pretrial proceedings; 

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between all parties that any and all 

stays of litigation entered by originating Courts for the Multidistrict Litigation Matters are lifted for 

the purposes of the Multidistrict Litigation before this Court. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Case 5:05-md-01654-JF Document 56 Filed 06/30/05 Page 2 of 7
M:05-cv-01654-PJH 

STIPULATION TO LIFT ALL STAYS FOR THE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION MATTERS 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: June 29, 2005 

By /s/ Eric W. Buether 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Compression 

Labs, Inc., Forgent Networks, Inc. and General 

Instrument, Inc. 

/s/ David W. Hansen 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Sun 

Microsystems, Inc. 

/s/ Ryan M. Kent 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Google Inc. 

/s/ David B. Weaver 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of BancTec, Inc. 

/s/ Brian Range 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Scansoft, Inc. 

/s/ Adam Hoffman 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of TiVo, Inc. 

/s/ Wes Mueller 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Agfa Corp. 

/s/ David B. Weaver 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Dell Inc. 

/s/ Darryl J. Adams 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Gateway, Inc. 

Case 5:05-md-01654-JF Document 56 Filed 06/30/05 Page 3 of 7
M:05-cv-01654-PJH 

STIPULATION TO LIFT ALL STAYS FOR THE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION MATTERS 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

/s/ Danny Williams 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of HewlettPackard Co. 

/s/ Morton Amster 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of JVC Americas 

Corp. 

/s/ Heather Mewes 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Macromedia, 

Inc. 

/s/ Morton Amster 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Panasonic 

Corporation of North America, Panasonic 

Communications Corporation of America, and 

Panasonic Mobile Communications Development 

Corporation of U.S.A. 

/s/ Donald R. Harris 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Mitsubishi 

Digital Electronics America, Inc. 

/s/ Frederick H. Colen 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Oce North 

America, Inc., 

/s/ Mark D. Flanagan 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of palmOne Inc. 

/s/ Anthony C. Roth 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Ricoh Corp. 

/s/ Peter E. Heuser 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Riverdeep, 

Inc. 

Case 5:05-md-01654-JF Document 56 Filed 06/30/05 Page 4 of 7
M:05-cv-01654-PJH 

STIPULATION TO LIFT ALL STAYS FOR THE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION MATTERS 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

/s/ Anthony C. Roth 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Savin Corp. 

/s/ Andrew Price 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Thomson, Inc.

/s/ Mark C. Scarsi 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Apple 

Computer, Inc. 

/s/ Barry W. Graham 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Axis Comms., 

Inc. 

/s/ Jack O’Brien 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Canon USA 

Inc 

/s/ Kenneth W. Donnelly 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Eastman 

Kodak Co. 

/s/ Steve Routh 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Fuji Photo 

Film USA 

/s/ Christopher E. Chalsen 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Fujitsu 

Computer Products of America, Inc. 

/s/ Keith R. Hummel 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of International 

Business Machines Corp. 

/s/ Keith M. Sorge 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Jasc Software, 

Inc. 

Case 5:05-md-01654-JF Document 56 Filed 06/30/05 Page 5 of 7
M:05-cv-01654-PJH 

STIPULATION TO LIFT ALL STAYS FOR THE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION MATTERS 5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

/s/ Denise M. DeMory 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Toshiba 

America Consumer Products, LLC, Toshiba 

America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronic 

Components, Inc., and Toshiba America 

Information Systems, Inc. 

/s/ James P. Bradley 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Xerox 

Corporation 

/s/ David W. Hansen 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Yahoo!, Inc. 

/s/ Amr O. Aly 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Creo, Inc., 

Creo Americas Inc. 

/s/ Lucas T. Elliot 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Acer America 

Corp. 

/s/ Garner K. Weng 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of BenQ America 

Corp. 

/s/ Scott Lampert 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Concord 

Camera Corp. 

/s/ Alan Blankenheimer 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Creative Labs, 

Inc. 

/s/ Stuart Lubitz 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Kyocera 

Wireless Corp. 

Case 5:05-md-01654-JF Document 56 Filed 06/30/05 Page 6 of 7
M:05-cv-01654-PJH 

STIPULATION TO LIFT ALL STAYS FOR THE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION MATTERS 6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

/s/ Scott Stevens 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Onkyo U.S.A. 

Corp. 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 5:05-md-01654-JF Document 56 Filed 06/30/05 Page 7 of 7