Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00407/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00407-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KEITH RUCKER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ARAMARK, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:16-cv-0407 AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff has twice been ordered to submit a certified copy of his prison trust account 

statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. ECF Nos. 

4, 7. However, while plaintiff has provided a copy of his trust account statement in response to 

each order, neither statement has been certified by prison staff.1

 ECF Nos. 6, 8. Plaintiff shall 

have another opportunity to submit a certified copy of his prison trust account statement. If 

plaintiff is unclear what he needs to send the court, he should show this order to his counselor or 

other appropriate prison staff. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of this 

order, plaintiff shall submit a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six 

 

1

 The most recent trust account statement looks as though it may have been signed by someone 

on the “Verified” line at the top of the statement. ECF No. 8. This is not consistent with the 

certification typically provided by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 

which includes the statement being stamped and signed by someone from the trust office. 

Case 2:16-cv-00407-AC Document 9 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff’s failure to comply 

with this order will result in dismissal of this action. 

DATED: June 23, 2016 

Case 2:16-cv-00407-AC Document 9 Filed 06/24/16 Page 2 of 2