Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00900/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00900-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Victor O. Dema, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

State of Arizona, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-0900-PHX-LOA

 CV-09-1710-PHX-MHB

ORDER

The Court has received and considered Plaintiff’s “Motion to

Reinstate/Consolidate (Previously Dismissed) Defendant’s First Child’s Removed State

Court Dependency Action with His Second Child’s Removed State Action now Pending in

Federal Court” (CV-09-1710-PHX-MHB). (docket #25)

On June 13, 2008, this case was dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the

Younger abstention doctrine and judgment entered by the Clerk of the Court. (docket ## 14,

15) Further, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which

subsequently dismissed the appeal for failure to prosecute on January 9, 2009. (docket #24)

Plaintiff cites no basis for setting aside the June 13, 2008 judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b),

FED.R.CIV.P. Additionally, Plaintiff’s Motion was not filed within either a reasonable time

or within one year after judgment was entered. Rule 60(c), FED.R.CIV.P.

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:08-cv-00900-LOA Document 26 Filed 12/17/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate/Consolidate (Previously

Dismissed) cases, docket #25, is DENIED.

Dated this 17th day of December, 2009.

Case 2:08-cv-00900-LOA Document 26 Filed 12/17/09 Page 2 of 2