Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01473/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01473-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA GRAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-01473 DLB PC

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR INQUIRY

(Document 39)

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Dana Gray (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 

filed this civil rights action on September 12, 2013. Pursuant to Court order, Plaintiff filed a First 

Amended Complaint on May 5, 2014, and a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on February 23, 

2015. 

The Court screened the SAC on April 27, 2015, and ordered Plaintiff to either file an 

amended complaint or notify the Court of her willingness only to proceed on the cognizable claims. 

Plaintiff was permitted to amend only the negligence claim.

On June 4, 2015, Plaintiff filed her second motion for inquiry/clarification. She asks if she 

may add Dr. Mundunari to the allegations, asks whether two factual statements are required, and 

when the amended complaint is due.

Plaintiff may add Dr. Mundunari to the amended complaint. She need only state the facts 

once. Finally, if Plaintiff fails to successfully amend the negligence claim, the Court would 

Case 1:13-cv-01473-DAD-GSA Document 40 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

normally proceed on the Eighth Amendment claims previously found cognizable. However, if 

Plaintiff amends to add Defendant Mundunari, the Court will have to screen the claims against her. 

Plaintiff’s amended complaint is due on or about June 16, 2015. As Plaintiff may not receive 

this order prior to that day, the Court will extend the deadline twenty-one (21) days from the date of 

service of this order.

No additional extensions will be permitted absent extraordinary circumstances.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 8, 2015 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01473-DAD-GSA Document 40 Filed 06/08/15 Page 2 of 2