Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02935/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02935-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENDING

DEADLINES FOR FACT/EXPERT DISCOVERY C05-2935 MEJ 1

JAMES B. CHANIN (SBN# 76043)

JULIE M. HOUK (SBN# 114968)

Law Offices of James B. Chanin

3050 Shattuck Avenue

Berkeley, California 94705

Telephone: (510) 848-4752, Ext. 2

Facsimile: (510) 848-5819

Email: jbcofc@aol.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UGANDA KNAPPS,

)

)

)

S

C

T

A

I

S

P

E

UL

N

A

O

T

C

I

0

O

5

N

-2

A

93

N

5

D

M

[P

E

R

J

OPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiffs, ) EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR

) COMPLETION OF FACT AND EXPERT

vs. ) DISCOVERY

)

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al, ) Trial Date: February 12, 2007

) Pretrial Conf. Date: February 8, 2006

Defendants. )

)

Case 3:05-cv-02935-MEJ Document 17 Filed 06/14/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENDING

DEADLINES FOR FACT/EXPERT DISCOVERY C05-2935 MEJ 2

WHEREAS, the parties believe that a significant amount of additional fact discovery

will need to be completed in order to be able to comply with the F.R.C.P. 26 expert witness

disclosure requirements and that it is unlikely that the remaining discovery can be completed

sufficiently in advance of the current July 17, 2006 expert disclosure deadline;

WHEREAS the parties believe that expert witness disclosure and discovery should

proceed following the completion of fact discovery so that the parties’ respective experts may

be able to fully comply with the F.R.C.P. 26 expert report requirements; and

WHEREAS the parties have worked cooperatively heretofore in the discovery process

heretofore and anticipate that they will be able to complete the fact and expert discovery by

the proposed deadlines in this Stipulation so that the completion of the discovery will not

interfere with the parties’ ability to comply with the other deadlines set forth in the Case

Management Order,

THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF

RECORD, DO HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST

THAT the deadlines set forth in the Court’s Case Management Order be modified as follows:

1. Fact discovery cut-off: September 8, 2006, with the depositions of Sgt. Kelly,

Officers Cardoza, Rojas, OPD “persons most knowledgeable” and the plaintiff to be

completed in August 2006;

2. Expert witness disclosure and disclosure of expert witness reports: October 13,

2006;

3. Rebuttal expert witness disclosure: October 23, 2006;

4. Expert witness discovery cut-off: November 30, 2006.

Case 3:05-cv-02935-MEJ Document 17 Filed 06/14/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENDING

DEADLINES FOR FACT/EXPERT DISCOVERY C05-2935 MEJ 3

All other deadlines set forth in the Court’s Case Management Order will remain the

same, including the dates for the trial, pretrial and preparation of trial documents.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: June 9, 2006 _____________s/s________________

JULIE M. HOUK

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: June 9, 2006 _____________s/s_________________

ARLENE ROSEN

Attorney for Defendants

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,

IT SO ORDERED:

Dated: June ____, 2006 _______________________________

MARIA ELENA JAMES

Magistrate Judge of the United States

District Court

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Maria-Elena James

Case 3:05-cv-02935-MEJ Document 17 Filed 06/14/06 Page 3 of 3