Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-00975/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-00975-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN T. ROGERS, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-01-0975 FCD GGH P

vs.

CLAUDE FINN, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

On April 29, 2004, the court dismissed the petition on grounds that the claims

were procedurally defaulted. On December 16, 2005, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

reversed and remanded this matter. On January 10, 2006, the court ordered the parties to file

further briefing addressing the issue of California’s timeliness rule. On February 2, 2006,

respondent filed a request to have this action resolved on the merits.

It has come to the court’s attention that petitioner may not have apprised the court

of his most recent address. The last communication with this court by petitioner was on March

9, 2004, when he filed a notice of change of address indicating that he was no longer

incarcerated. The court has recently obtained information from the California Department of

Corrections and Rehabilitation that petitioner was released from custody on or around January

24, 2006. Apparently, petitioner was re-incarcerated during the time this action was on appeal. 

Case 2:01-cv-00975-FCD-GGH Document 52 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Petitioner has not since filed a notice of change of address indicating his new address following

his latest release from prison.

Petitioner’s failure to file a notice of change of address suggests that he is no

longer interested in pursuing this action. Accordingly, petitioner is directed to file a notice of

change of address within ten days of the date of this order. If petitioner does not respond to this

order, the court will recommend dismissal of this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within ten days of the date of this

order, petitioner shall file a notice of change of address.

DATED: 2/14/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

ro975.fb

Case 2:01-cv-00975-FCD-GGH Document 52 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2