Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520-1016/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 

Defendants.

No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P 

ORDER 

 In a bench ruling on October 23, 2019, Reporter’s Transcript of Proceedings 

(10/23/2019 RT), ECF No. 6380, subsequently memorialized in a written order filed December 

17, 2019, ECF No 6247, the court has found defendants knowingly provided false and misleading 

information material to ongoing remedial efforts in this long running matter. On October 23, 

2019, the court directed plaintiffs to file within seven days a brief identifying their proposed 

remedies for the identified violations. Plaintiffs filed their brief on October 30, 2019, ECF No. 

6374, and defendants filed a response on November 13, 2019, ECF No. 6388. After review, the 

court now issues this first in a series of remedial orders.1

1

 Defendants have begun the process of correcting documents filed with the court and 

submitted to the Special Master. See, e.g., ECF No. 6302. The parties have also filed briefing on 

proposals for certification of data going forward. ECF Nos. 6383, 6384. The court will address 

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 6435 Filed 12/23/19 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

I. ACCESS TO MENTAL HEALTH BUSINESS RULES AND DATA 

The first remedial measure proposed by all parties involves relocating 

management of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) mental health 

care data from CDCR Mental Health Headquarters to the California Correctional Health Care 

System (CCHCS) Quality Management Section, overseen by the Plata Receiver.2 See ECF No. 

6374 at 4-7; ECF No. 6388 at 7. This proposal originated with defendants, and plaintiffs are in 

agreement. See ECF No. 6374 at 4; ECF No. 6388 at 7. 

As the court has made clear, see 10/23/2019 RT at 467:15-21, the framework in 

which it would approve such a transition, if at all, is that of client and service provider. That is, 

the court interprets this proposal as one in which the parties are proposing use of the CCHCS 

Quality Management Section as the quality manager and service provider in this court’s remedial 

proceedings. The court and the Special Master would therefore be clients of this proposed service 

provider. Assuming this framework, the court intends to take all steps necessary to ensure that 

the needs of the plaintiff class and complete remediation in this action would be served by such 

an arrangement, prior to any approval. The parties must take certain preliminary steps to allow 

the court to begin the process of assessing whether this proposal or some variation thereof should 

be adopted. This order directs the taking of those initial steps.

First, with the parties’ concurrence, the court has authorized the Special Master to 

hire his own data expert or otherwise make arrangements to ensure he has the necessary data 

expertise at his disposal. Concurrently, defendants must arrange for the Special Master must 

forthwith be given access to all of the business rules defendants are currently using to process 

mental health data and generate informational reports related to delivery of constitutionally 

adequate mental health care to members of the plaintiff class. This access must include, but not 

be limited to, access to business rules in use by the CCHCS Quality Management Section if that 

 

correction of the existing record, data certification and other matters related to necessary 

remediation following hearing on the Golding Report in subsequent orders. 

2 Plata v. Newsom, Case No. C01-1351 JST (N.D.Cal.) 

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 6435 Filed 12/23/19 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

section is processing any data or generating any reports related to the delivery of constitutionally 

adequate mental health care to members of the plaintiff class. 

Second, defendants must arrange for the Special Master to be included in all 

discussions that concern use of the CCHCS Quality Management Section to manage CDCR 

Mental Health data. Defendants shall comply with this order and must take all steps necessary to 

both include the Special Master in all such discussions and respond to any steps the Special 

Master may require of them in the process of their compliance. 

Third, both the Special Master and the plaintiffs must forthwith have access to all 

mental health care data that affects the care and treatment of members of the plaintiff class.

Defendants shall take all steps necessary to make sure this access is available forthwith. 

II. MESSAGING 

As discussed in the December 17, 2019 order, the court expects that 

Undersecretary Toche “is thinking deeply about a proper response to plaintiffs’ counsel’s 

question [at hearing on the Golding Report] about how she can work to make clear to those who 

work for and with her that ‘CDCR has been found to have violated the Constitution as to the 

mental health program and is under a remedial order supervised by this court’ and that ‘Coleman

is not just a word’ but signifies a federal court order, ‘upheld by the United States Supreme 

Court[,] that governs a remedial process.’ 10/16/19 RT at 359:12-360:4.” ECF No. 6427 at 46.

The court has directed Dr. Toche to provide a report on her answer to that question by the March 

23, 2020 status conference. Id. Given the flurry of activity since the hearing on the Golding 

Report, and the central importance of defendants’ appropriate answer to this question as a 

threshold reframing as defendants take steps to ensure they never again lose sight of the 

substantive issues at stake for members of the plaintiff class, cf., e.g., id. at 44-46, the court now 

directs Dr. Toche to file an initial statement within the next thirty days setting forth the steps she 

has already taken and is planning to take to provide a complete response to the question posed at 

hearing and to the gravamen of the court’s findings.

////

/////

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 6435 Filed 12/23/19 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, defendants shall file a list of 

all steps they have taken to ensure that the Special Master has access to all the 

business rules defendants are currently using to process mental health data and 

generate informational reports related to delivery of constitutionally adequate 

mental health care to members of the plaintiff class, including access to 

business rules in use by the CCHCS Quality Management Section if that 

section is processing any data or generating any reports related to the delivery 

of constitutionally adequate mental health care to members of the plaintiff 

class. 

2. Defendants shall promptly take all steps necessary to ensure that the Special 

Master is included in all discussions that concern use of the CCHCS Quality 

Management Section to manage CDCR Mental Health data and shall respond 

promptly to any and all steps the Special Master may require of them during 

this process. 

3. Within fourteen days from the date of this order defendants shall file a list 

setting forth all steps they have taken to provide the Special Master and the 

plaintiffs access to all mental health care data that affects the care and 

treatment of members of the plaintiff class. With respect to the Special Master, 

such access is governed by the Order of Reference, ECF No. 640. With 

respect to plaintiffs’ counsel, such access is subject to the applicable protective 

orders issued in this action.

4. Within thirty days from the date of this order Undersecretary Toche shall file a 

statement responsive to this order. 

DATED: December 23, 2019. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 6435 Filed 12/23/19 Page 4 of 4