Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01497/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01497-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1497

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

US ATTORNEY OF MARYLAND, Rod Rosenstein, et al; UNKNOWN 

DEFENDANTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-1786

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LORETTA LYNCH, US Attorney General - Respondents et al 

defendants: Melvin Bright,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District 

of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:15-cv-01137-JFM; 1:15-cv-02005-JFM )

Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015

Appeal: 15-1497 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/31/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1497 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/31/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph 

appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaints

for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012). 

We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Randolph v. US Attorney of Md., No. 1:15-

cv-01137-JFM (D. Md. filed Apr. 30, 2015; entered May 1, 2015); 

Randolph v. Lynch, No. 1:15-cv-02005-JFM (D. Md. July 10, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 15-1497 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/31/2015 Pg: 3 of 3