Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-04175/USCOURTS-cand-5_12-cv-04175-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

DB2/ 23805227.1

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

BRETT M. SCHUMAN (SBN 189247)

bschuman@morganlewis.com

RACHEL M. WALSH (SBN 250568)

rwalsh@morganlewis.com

One Market, Spear Street Tower

San Francisco, California 94105-1126

Telephone: 415.442.1000

Facsimile: 415.442.1001

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

NavCom Technology, Inc., and Deere &

Company

MICHAEL A. LADRA (SBN 64307)

mike.ladra@lw.com

MATTHEW RAWLINSON (SBN 231890)

matt.rawlinson@lw.com

ALLISON S. DAVIDSON (SBN 267964)

allison.davidson@lw.com

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

140 Scott Drive

Menlo Park, California 94025

Telephone: (650) 328-4600

Facsimile: (650) 463-2600

Attorneys for Defendant

Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NAVCOM TECHNOLOGY, INC.; and

DEERE & COMPANY,

Plaintiffs,

v.

OKI ELECTRIC INDUSTRY CO., LTD.; and

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:12-cv-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted.

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated

Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on

all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure

and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment

under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section

14.4, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential

information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62 set forth the procedures that

(MODIFIED BY THE COURT) *E-FILED: January 24, 2013*

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

2

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the

court to file material under seal.

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of

information or items under this Order.

2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 26(c).

2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well as their

support staff).

2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it

produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the

medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,

testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or

responses to discovery in this matter.

2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to

the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or

as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s

competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party

or of a Party’s competitor.

2.7 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or

Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another

Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by

less restrictive means.

2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House

Counsel does not include Outside Counsel.

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 2 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

3

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal

entity not named as a Party to this action.

2.10 Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are

retained to represent or advise a party to this action.

2.11 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,

consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel (and their support staffs).

2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery

Material in this action.

2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services

(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and

organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and

subcontractors.

2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as

“CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a

Producing Party.

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material

(as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material;

(2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony,

conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following

information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a

Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as

a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the

public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party

prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 3 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

4

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating

Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order.

4. DURATION

Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by

this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court

order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all

claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after

the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action,

including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to

applicable law.

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party

or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care

to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.

To the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate for protection only

those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that

other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not

warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are

shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary

expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated

for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection

initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is

withdrawing the mistaken designation.

5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order

(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,

For a period of six months after final disposition of this litigation, this court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this order.

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 4 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

5

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so

designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents,

but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing

Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’

EYES ONLY” to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the

material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the

protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for

each portion, the level of protection being asserted.

A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection

need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which

material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all

of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants

copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof,

qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the

Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) to each page that contains Protected

Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the

Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being

asserted.

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings,

that the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or

other proceeding, all protected testimony and specify the level of protection being asserted. When

it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection and it

appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Designating

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 5 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

6

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Party may invoke on the record (before the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding is concluded)

a right to have up to 21 days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to which

protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted. Only those portions of

the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 21 days shall be covered

by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Alternatively, a Designating Party may

specify, at the deposition or up to 21 days afterwards on written notice, that the entire transcript

shall be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES

ONLY.”

Parties shall give the other parties notice if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing or

other proceeding to include Protected Material so that the other parties can ensure that only

authorized individuals who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”

(Exhibit A) are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition

shall not in any way affect its designation as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page

that the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all

pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material and

the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall

inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the

expiration of a 21-day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been

designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless

otherwise agreed. After the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be treated only as

actually designated.

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for

any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the

container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL”

or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only a portion or portions of

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 6 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

7

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall

identify the protected portion(s) and specify the level of protection being asserted.

5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to

designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s

right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a

designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is

treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of

confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality

designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic

burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to

challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the

original designation is disclosed.

6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution

process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis

for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written

notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this

specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in

good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other

forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In

conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality

designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the

designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered,

to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next

stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or

establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in

a timely manner.

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 7 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

8

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

6.3 Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court

intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under

Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, if

applicable) within 21 days of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties

agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each

such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has

complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by

the Designating Party to make such a motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or

14 days, if applicable) shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each

challenged designation. In addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a

confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge to

the designation of a deposition transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to

this provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has

complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating

Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to

sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to

file a motion to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the

material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s

designation until the court rules on the challenge.

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or

produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,

defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to

the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has

been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 15 below (FINAL

DISPOSITION).

parties shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil Discovery Disputes Any Discovery Dispute Joint Report shall affirm that ^

have been satisfied. seek judicial intervention seek relief with respect to seek relief

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 8 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

9

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and

in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.

7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered

by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any

information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel in this action, as well as employees

of said Outside Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this

litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is

attached hereto as Exhibit A;

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the

Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have

signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment

and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(d) the court and its personnel;

(e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and

Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have

signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is

reasonably necessary and who is (i) the author of the original source of the “CONFIDENTIAL”

material, (ii) an actual or intended recipient of the “CONFIDENTIAL” material, (iii) someone for

whom there is a reasonable basis to believe has previously seen or received the

“CONFIDENTIAL” material, (iv) or who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to

Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court.

Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material

must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as

permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order.

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 9 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

10 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a

custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”

Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the

Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel in this action, as well as employees

of said Outside Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this

litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is

attached hereto as Exhibit A;

(b) House Counsel of the Receiving Party to whom it is reasonably necessary

to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and

Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

(c) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably

necessary for this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be

Bound” (Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4(a)(1), below,

have been followed;

(d) the court and its personnel;

(e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and

Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have

signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and

(f) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a

custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

7.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” to Experts

(a) (1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the

Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this Order) any

information or item that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 10 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

11 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

EYES ONLY” pursuant to paragraph 7.3(c) first must make a written request to the Designating

Party that (1) identifies the general categories of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’

EYES ONLY” information that the Receiving Party seeks permission to disclose to the Expert,

(2) sets forth the full name of the Expert and the city and state of his or her primary residence,

(3) attaches a copy of the Expert’s current resume, (4) identifies the Expert’s current employer(s),

(5) identifies each person or entity from whom the Expert has received compensation or funding

for work in his or her areas of expertise or to whom the expert has provided professional services,

including in connection with a litigation, at any time during the preceding five years, and

(6) identifies (by name and number of the case, filing date, and location of court) any litigation in

connection with which the Expert has offered expert testimony, including through a declaration,

report, or testimony at a deposition or trial, during the preceding five years.

(b) A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the

preceding respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified

Expert unless, within 14 days of delivering the request, the Party receives a written objection

from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in detail the grounds on which it is

based.

(c) A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with

the Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by

agreement within seven days of the written objection. If no agreement is reached, the Party

seeking to make the disclosure to the Expert may file a motion as provided in Civil Local Rule 7

(and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, if applicable) seeking

permission from the court to do so. Any such motion must describe the circumstances with

specificity, set forth in detail the reasons why the disclosure to the Expert is reasonably necessary,

assess the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail, and suggest any additional means that

could be used to reduce that risk. In addition, any such motion must be accompanied by a

competent declaration describing the parties’ efforts to resolve the matter by agreement (i.e., the

extent and the content of the meet and confer discussions) and setting forth the reasons advanced

by the Designating Party for its refusal to approve the disclosure.

parties shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil Discovery Disputes.

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 11 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

12 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to Designated House Counsel or the

Expert shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail

(under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected

Material to its Designated House Counsel or Expert.

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER

LITIGATION

If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels

disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” [that Party must:

(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall

include a copy of the subpoena or court order;

(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to

issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is

subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated

Protective Order; and

(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued

by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.

If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the

subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” before a

determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained

the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of

seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions

should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a

lawful directive from another court.

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 12 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

13 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS

LITIGATION

(a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a NonParty in this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with

this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these

provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.

(b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to

produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an

agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the

Party shall:

1. promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party

that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a NonParty;

2. promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated

Protective Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific

description of the information requested; and

3. make the information requested available for inspection by the

Non-Party.

(c) If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court

within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may

produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the NonParty timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its

possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a

determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the

burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.

See Paragraph 14.

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 13 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

14 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective

Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the

unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the

Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were

made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED

MATERIAL

When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently

produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the

Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This

provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery

order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of

Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a

communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product

protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order

submitted to the court.

12. MISCELLANEOUS

12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to

seek its modification by the court in the future.

12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective

Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any

information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no

Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered

by this Protective Order.

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 14 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

15 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

12.3 Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party

or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in

the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any

Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62. Protected

Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the

specific Protected Material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, a

sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that the Protected Material at issue is

privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a

Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-

5(d) and General Order 62 is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the Protected

Material in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise instructed by

the court.

13. FINAL DISPOSITION

Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each

Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such

material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts,

compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected

Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must

submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the

Designating Party) by the 60-day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all

the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has

not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or

capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to

retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts,

legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work

product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected

Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to

this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 15 of 17
2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS & 

!lOcK! US LLP 

ATIORNEYSATLAW 

SAN F~ANCt'>CO 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

DATED: ----=!-+-/-'--{ ~-~-[_f <;, ___ --#----##---~----"'--'-------~ I 

DATED: -------'--\\--\-\-~~\ ')=--------'------'----

\ \ Attorneys for Defendant 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ________________________________________________ _ 

DB2/ 23805227 .l 

Hon. Edward l Davila 

United States District Judge 

16 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

14. In the event of any discovery or disclosure dispute, the parties and any affected 

non-parties shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil Discovery 

Disputes. ^

AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT January 24, 2013

HOWARD R. LLOYD 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 16 of 17
DB2/ 23805227.1

17 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

EXHIBIT A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of

_________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read

in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States

District Court for the Northern District of California on [date] in the case of Navcom Technology,

Inc. et al. v. Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. et al., Case No. 5:12-cv-04175-EDJ. I agree to comply

with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and

acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature

of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item

that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict

compliance with the provisions of this Order.

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for

the Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated

Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of

_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone

number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any

proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.

Date: _________________________________

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________

Printed name: ______________________________

[printed name]

Signature: __________________________________

[signature]

Case 5:12-cv-04175-EJD Document 59 Filed 01/24/13 Page 17 of 17