Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04387/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04387-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

3116294_1.DOC 

1 JEROME F. BIRN, JR., State Bar No. 128561 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LLOYD WINAWER, State Bar No. 157823 

NICOLE M. HEALY, State Bar No. 157417 

MERAV A. MAGEN, State Bar No. 236144 

CHRISTOPHER R. HOWALD, State Bar No. 243598 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Email: nhealy@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

KONG YEU HAN, PAUL JEI-ZEN SONG, 

MICHAEL D. McDONALD, THOMAS C. 

DOCZY, and Nominal Defendant 

INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC., 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, 

INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE 

LITIGATION, 

Master File No. C-06-04387 RMW 

STIPULATION AND [] 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL MATTERS 

 

STIPULATION AND [] SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C-06-04387 *E-FILED - 6/6/07*

Case 5:06-cv-04387-RMW Document 33 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 5
-1- 3116294_1.DOC 

WHEREAS, this is a consolidated shareholder derivative action purportedly brought on 

behalf of Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. (“ISSI”) against certain officers and directors of ISSI; 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint in 

the instant action on November 27, 2006; 

WHEREAS, the deadline for Defendants’ responses to the Consolidated Shareholder 

Complaint was extended by stipulation and order to May 14, 2007; 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding the scheduling of the 

Defendants’ responses to the Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint; 

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed to participate in non-binding 

mediation in an effort to resolve this action; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, subject 

to the approval of the Court, that the Defendants shall have an additional ninety (90) days to file 

their responses to the Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint; and 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendants’ responses to the 

Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint currently on file with the Court shall be filed on 

or before August 13, 2007; Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to any motions filed by the Defendants shall be 

filed on or before September 12, 2007; and Defendants’ reply briefs shall be filed on or before 

October 12, 2007. 

Dated: May 14, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

 s/ Nicole M. Healy 

Nicole M. Healy 

 

Attorneys for Defendants Kong Yeu Han, Paul 

Jei-Zen Song, Michael D. McDonald, Thomas 

C. Doczy, and Nominal Defendant Integrated 

Silicon Solution, Inc. 

STIPULATION AND [] SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C-06-04387 

Case 5:06-cv-04387-RMW Document 33 Filed 06/06/07 Page 2 of 5
-2- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: May 14, 2007 BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & 

BIRKHAEUSER, LLP 

 s/ Alan R. Plutzik 

 Alan R. Plutzik 

 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Dated: May 14, 2007 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 s/ William H. Kimball 

William H. Kimball 

 Attorneys for Defendant Jimmy S.M. Lee 

Dated: May 14, 2007 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP 

 s/ William S. Freeman 

William S. Freeman Attorneys for Defendant Gary L. Fischer 

Dated: May 14, 2007 BERGESON, LLP

 s/ Daniel J. Bergeson 

Daniel J. Bergeson Attorneys for Defendant Lip-Bu Tan 

Dated: May 14, 2007 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

AND DORR 

 s/ Mark D. Flanagan 

Mark D. Flanagan 

 

Attorneys for Defendant Hide Tanigami 

STIPULATION AND [] SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C-06-04387 

Case 5:06-cv-04387-RMW Document 33 Filed 06/06/07 Page 3 of 5
 -3- 3116294_1.DOC 

1 [] ORDER 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the Defendants shall have an 

additional ninety (90) days to file their response to the Consolidated Shareholder Derivative 

Complaint. 

Defendants’ response to the Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint shall be filed 

on or before August 13, 2007; 

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to any motions filed by the Defendants shall be filed on or before 

September 12, 2007; and 

Defendants’ reply briefs shall be filed on or before October 12, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

_______________________________ 

 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

STIPULATION AND [] SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C-06-04387 Dated: 6/6/07

Case 5:06-cv-04387-RMW Document 33 Filed 06/06/07 Page 4 of 5
 -4- 3116294_1.DOC 

1 ECF CERTIFICATION

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

I, Nicole M. Healy, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order. In compliance with General 

Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that all parties have concurred in this filing. 

Dated: May 14, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: s/ Nicole M. Healy_________ 

 Nicole M. Healy 

STIPULATION AND [] SCHEDULING ORDER

Case No. C-06- 04387 

Case 5:06-cv-04387-RMW Document 33 Filed 06/06/07 Page 5 of 5