Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04646/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04646-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

-1- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

TODD A. NOAH (SBN 152328) 

TED K. JOE (SBN 242589) 

DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1450 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Tel: (415) 705-6377 

Fax: (415) 705-6383 

E-mail: tnoah@dergnoah.com

DOUGLAS R. KERTSCHER (pro hac vice admission pending) 

HILL, KERTSCHER & WHARTON, LLP 

3350 Riverwood Parkway – Suite 800 

Atlanta, Georgia 30339 

Tel: (770) 953-0995 

Fax: (770) 953-1358 

E-mail: drk@hkw-law.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

SERCONET, LTD. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SERCONET, LTD., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

NETGEAR, INC. 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. C-06-4646 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

) 

) 

 

The parties stipulate to participate in the Court process of mediation. Plaintiff SercoNet, Ltd. 

agrees to hold the mediation by the presumptive deadline of ninety (90) days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process. Defendant Netgear, Inc. believes that mediation would be more 

productive if it is held after SercoNet has narrowed its list of claims and after the disputed claim terms 

have been construed by the Court. 

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Civil Action No. C 06-4646 PJH 

Case 4:06-cv-04646-PJH Document 14 Filed 11/03/06 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: November 1, 2006 /s/ Todd A. Noah 

 Todd A. Noah

 Counsel for SercoNet, Ltd. 

Dated: November 1, 2006 /s/ Christopher Parry 

 Christopher Parry 

 Counsel for Netgear, Inc. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to Mediation. The 

deadline for the ADR session is ______________________________. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: November ___, 2006 ____________________________ 

 Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

 United States District Judge 

 

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Civil Action No. C 06-4646 PJH 

to be completed within 90 days 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-04646-PJH Document 14 Filed 11/03/06 Page 2 of 2