Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03697/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03697-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1 Brian E. Hawes (SBN 104519)

Law Offices of Brian E. Hawes

2 1900 S. Norfolk: Street, Suite 350

San Mateo, CA 94403

3 Telephone: (650) 320-1616

Facsimile: (650) 763-8745

4 brian@haweslawfirm.com

5 Attorney for Plaintiff

CHENELLES~INGTON

6

7 Steven R. Blackburn

Matthew A. Goodin

8 EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.c.

9

655 Montgomery Street, Suite 1150

San Francisco, CA 94111

10 Telephone: (415) 398-3500

Fax No.: (415) 398-0955

11

Attorney for Defendants

12 AEROTEK, INC. and AEROTEK

SCIENTIFIC, LLC

13

14

15

16

17

18 CHENELLE SIMINGTON,

19 Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20 vs.

21 AEROTEK, INC.; AEROTEK

SCIENTIFIC, LLC; and DOES 1 through

22 100, inclusive,

23 Defendants.

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:15-cv-03697-WHO

STIPULATION AND

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Chenelle Simington v. Aerotek,

Inc., et al.

1

Stipulation and [proposed] Order of

Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice

Case No. 3:15-cv-03697-WHO

Case 3:15-cv-03697-WHO Document 16 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 2
1 STPULATION

2 Pursuant to Federal Rilles of Civil Procedure Rille 41(a)(I)(A)(ii), PlaintiffChenelle Simington

3 and Defendants Aerotek, Inc. and Aerotek Scientific, LLC, by their undersigned counsel, stipulate to

4 the dismissal of this entire action with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys'

5 fees.

6

7 Dated: May -.!L, 2016

8

9

10

11

12

13 Dated: May!l, 2016

14

15

16

LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN E. HAWES

BY:~

Bnan E. Hawes, Attorney or • fi

Plaintiff Chenelle Simington

EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.

/s/ Matthew A. Goodin

By:

Matthew A. Goodin, Attorneys for

Defendants Aerotek, Inc. and Aerotek

Scientific, LLC 17

18

19 [PROPOSED] ORDER

20 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed in its

21 entirety with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

22

23 IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

25 Dated: _

Honorable William H. Orrick

United States District Judge 26

27

28 2

Chenelle Simington v. Aerotek,

Inc., et al.

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of

Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice

Case No. 3:15-cv-03697-WHO

Case 3:15-cv-03697-WHO Document 16 Filed 05/09/16 Page 2 of 2