Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05418/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05418-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR

MANUFACTURING, LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTEGRATED SEMICONDUCTOR 

SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant. 

INTEGRATED SEMICONDUCTOR 

SERVICE, INC.,

Counter-Claimant,

v.

CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR

MANUFACTURING, LTD.,

Counter-Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C04-5418 WHA (BZ)

ORDER REGARDING UPCOMING

HEARING

At the April 18, 2007, hearing, plaintiff should be

prepared to discuss: 

1) whether seeking issuance of a writ of possession

pursuant to California Civil Code section 512 is an

Case 3:04-cv-05418-WHA Document 58 Filed 04/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

appropriate post-judgment enforcement method. See Simms v.

NPCK Enterprises, Inc., 109 Cal. App. 4th 233, 241-42 (2003)

(describing the procedures under section 511.010 et seq. as

providing “a complete prejudgment remedy to recover possession

of personal property.”); see also Cal. Civ. Code § 512.010,

Legislative Committee Comment, Subdivision (a); and cf. Cal.

Civ. Code § 681.010 (setting forth “[p]rovisions for enforcing

judgments”); 

2) whether seeking a writ of possession is appropriate

where the only portion of the judgment left to be enforced is

for payment of money; and 

3) the basis for the Court’s jurisdiction over

plaintiff’s motion regarding fraudulent transfers in light of

the judgment’s limitation on jurisdiction and the absence of a

separate claim for fraudulent transfer. 

Defendant should be prepared to discuss the commercial

reasonableness of the lease agreement at issue. 

Dated: April 13, 2007

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR\ORDER.RE.HEARING.wpd

Case 3:04-cv-05418-WHA Document 58 Filed 04/13/07 Page 2 of 2