Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02071/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02071-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes

---

STIP AND EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER PERMITTING BRIEF IN EXCESS OF 25 PAGES

Case No.: C-06-2071 VRW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CARLSON 

CALLADINE 

&

PETERSON, LLP 

353 SACRAMENTO STREET

16TH FLOOR

San Francisco, CA 94111 

DONALD W. CARLSON [Bar No.: 79258] dcarlson@ccplaw.com 

GUY D. CALLADINE [Bar No.: 99431] gcalladine@ccplaw.com

EDWARD F. DONOHUE [Bar No.: 112730] edonohue@ccplaw.com 

CARLSON, CALLADINE & PETERSON LLP 

353 Sacramento Street, 16th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 391-3911 

Facsimile: (415) 391-3898 

ANDREW W. HAYES 

HAYES & HARDY, LLP 

1 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 1005 

New York, New York 10020 

Telephone (212) 554-3120 

Facsimile: (212) 332-3121 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FRANÇOIS MARLAND 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER LLP, fka THELEN REID & 

PRIEST LLP, 

 Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant 

 

 v. 

FRANÇOIS MARLAND, 

 Defendant and Counter-Claimant 

 

AND RELATED CLAIMS 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

)

) 

CASE NO.: C-06-2071 VRW 

STIPULATION AND EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR ORDER 

PERMITTING BRIEF IN EXCESS OF 

TWENTY-FIVE PAGES 

Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 170 Filed 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 214 Filed 04/06/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CARLSON 

CALLADINE 

&

PETERSON LLP 

353 SACRAMENTO STREET

16TH FLOOR

San Francisco, CA 94111 

2

1. Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP 

(“Thelen”), and Defendant and Counter-claimant François Marland (“Marland”) hereby stipulate 

to the following: 

2. The court has set a deadline for filing dispositive motions including motions for 

summary judgment and summary adjudication. Each of the respective parties plans to seek 

summary judgment on multiple legal issues, causes of action and defenses. In the case of 

Marland, six to seven substantive grounds for summary judgment will be made as to two 

affirmative claims and four affirmative defenses. Plaintiff and counter-claim defendant Thelen is 

seeking summary judgment or judgment on the pleadings as to one affirmative claim, all five of 

Marland’s counterclaims, and one of Marland’s affirmative defenses. Thelen previously filed one 

summary judgment motion on its statute of limitations affirmative defense.. 

3. In light of the complexity and number of issues to briefed, the parties have agreed 

and seek approval of a mutual exception to the page length requirements of Local Rule 7-4 as 

follows: 

Marland Opening Brief 40 pages 

Thelen Opening Brief 30 pages 

Opposition Briefs 30 pages each 

(Marland will file one combined opposition brief to both of Thelen’s summary 

judgment motions) 

Reply Briefs 20 pages each 

185-1/PLEADINGS/MARLAND/2007-04-04STIP 

STIP AND EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER PERMITTING BRIEF IN EXCESS OF 25 PAGES

Case No.: C-06-2071 VRW

Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 170 Filed 04/04/2007 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 214 Filed 04/06/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CARLSON 

CALLADINE 

&

PETERSON LLP 

353 SACRAMENTO STREET

16TH FLOOR

San Francisco, CA 94111 

3

 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and that this application was 

sworn and executed on April 4, 2007. 

 _______/s/ Edward F. Donohue________ 

EDWARD F. DONOHUE 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

Dated: April 4, 2007 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

 By: _____/s/ Wendy J. Thurm____ 

 WENDY J. THURM 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant 

Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP, 

fka Thelen Reid & Priest LLP 

 It is so ordered that the points and authorities maybe submitted within the foregoing 

stipulated pages lengths and shall be accepted by the clerk of this court. 

DATED: April ___, 2007 

 _________________________________ 

 Vaughn R. Walker 

 United States District Court Judge 

185-1/PLEADINGS/MARLAND/2007-04-04STIP 

STIP AND EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER PERMITTING BRIEF IN EXCESS OF 25 PAGES

Case No.: C-06-2071 VRW

Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 170 Filed 04/04/2007 Page 3 of 3

6

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANTED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:06-cv-02071-VRW Document 214 Filed 04/06/07 Page 3 of 3