Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-04949/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-04949-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary of Labor,

United States Department of Labor,

Plaintiff, No. C 04-4949 PJH

v. ORDER RE REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO

FILE SECOND DISPOSITIVE MOTION

LAWRENCE J. MAZZOLA, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

The court has read and considered defendants’ request for leave to file a second

motion for summary judgment, and plaintiff’s response to that request. The court finds that

defendants have not established the necessity for filing two separate motions. 

Nevertheless, the court finds that some allowance should be made because of the number

of defendants in the case. Accordingly, the court will permit defendants to withdraw the two

motions they have already filed, and to file a single motion, not to exceed 35 pages in

length. Plaintiff’s opposition to defendants’ motion shall not exceed 35 pages, and the reply

shall not exceed 20 pages. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 13, 2006 ______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-04949-PJH Document 194 Filed 12/13/06 Page 1 of 1