Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-02275/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-02275-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

NO. C-05-02275 PJH

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DATAPARK, INC., et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

GMG SYSTEMS, INC., a Nevada corporation; et al. 

 Defendants. 

No. C-05-02275-PJH 

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Defendants, counterclaimants and third-party plaintiffs GMG Systems Inc. 

and Omnipro, Inc. and defendants Omnimex, Krasimir Gospodinov, Valentin Georgiev, 

and Tzvetan Mikov hereby substitute Creative Industry Law Group, 526 Columbus Avenue, 2nd Floor, San Francisco, California 94133 as their attorneys of record in place of 

MBV Law LLP. 

GMG SYSTEMS, INC. 

Dated: April 3 , 2006. By s/Valentin Georgiev 

Valentin Georgiev 

Vice President of Production 

DAVID T. ALEXANDER, ESQ. (SBN 49996) 

MBV LAW LLP 

855 Front Street 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: 415-781-4400 

Facsimile: 415-989-5143 

Attorneys for Defendants, Counterclaimants 

and third-party plaintiffs GMG Systems, Inc. 

and Omnipro, Inc. and defendants Omnimex, 

Krasimir Gospodinov, Valentin Georgiev and 

Tzvetan Mikov 

AND ORDER

Case 4:05-cv-02275-PJH Document 105 Filed 10/23/06 Page 1 of 3
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

NO. C-05-02275 PJH

-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OMNIPRO INCORPORATED 

Dated: April _3 , 2006. By s/Krasimir Gospodinov 

Krasimir Gospodinov 

Vice President 

OMNIMEX, INC. 

Dated: April _3_, 2006. By s/Krasimir Gospodinov 

Krasimir Gospodinov 

President 

Dated: April _3_, 2006. s/Valentin Georgiev 

Valentin Georgiev, Individually 

Dated: April _3_, 2006. s/Krasimir Gospodinov 

Krasimir Gospodinov, Individually 

Dated: April _3_, 2006. s/Tzvetan Mikov 

Tzvetan Mikov, Individually 

We hereby consent to the above substitution. 

Dated: April 3, 2006. 

MBV LAW LLP 

By s/David T. Alexander 

David T. Alexander 

We hereby accept the above substitution. 

Dated: April 3, 2006. 

CREATIVE INDUSTRY LAW GROUP 

By s/Lizbeth Hasse 

Lizbeth L. Hasse 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

10/23/06

Case 4:05-cv-02275-PJH Document 105 Filed 10/23/06 Page 2 of 3
 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

NO. C-05-02275 PJH

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO: 

 I, Jeff O’Brien, am employed in the aforesaid county, State of California; I am over 

the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my business address 526 Columbus Avenue, Second Floor, San Francisco, CA 94133. 

 On April 4, 2006 I served the foregoing: 

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 

on the interested party(s) in this action by placing the documents thereof, enclosed in a 

sealed envelope, to be delivered by regular U.S. Mail, as well as via Facsimile, addressed 

as follows to: 

 Gregory Alan Rutchik 

 Liner Yankelevitz Sunshine & Regenstreif LLP 

 199 Fremont Street, Suite 2000 

 San Francisco, CA 94105 

 Facsimile: 415-489-7701 

 (via regular mail and facsimile) 

 

 I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of using the U.S. Postal Service for 

document service purposes. Under the practice of using the U.S. Postal Service, the 

documents are deposited in a post office, mailbox, mail chute or other like facility regularly maintained by the U.S. Postal Service, in a sealed envelope, with postage paid, addressed to the person on whom it is to be served. 

 Additionally, the above-referenced documents were sent via facsimile to the party 

mentioned above. I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of transmitting documents via facsimile. Under that practice it would be transmitted via our office fax machine at San Francisco, California. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

 Executed on April 4, 2006 at San Francisco, California. 

 s/Jeff O’Brien 

 Jeff O’Brien 

Case 4:05-cv-02275-PJH Document 105 Filed 10/23/06 Page 3 of 3