Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00821/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00821-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Plaintiff asks for an extension of time to file objections to the findings and 1

recommendations. However, after being granted a second extension of time to file objections,

plaintiff was informed on March 9, 2007 that no further extensions of time would be granted. 

Plaintiff has not shown cause to revisit that decision.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNARD LEE DAVIS, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0821 LKK KJM P

vs.

 M. KNOWLES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 25, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that they could

file objections to the findings and recommendations. Neither party has filed objections to the

findings and recommendations.

1

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00821-LKK -KJM Document 57 Filed 04/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 25, 2007 are adopted in full;

and 

2. The July 24, 2006 motion to dismiss filed by defendants Attygalla, Cassim,

Cook, Deliberto, Hooper, Howard, King, Knowles, Lopez, O’Brian, Penner and Turella are

granted in part and denied in part as follows:

A. Granted with respect to plaintiff’s claims against defendants Attygalla,

Cassim, Deliberto, Hooper, Howard, King, Knowles, Lopez, O’Brian,

Penner and Turella, thereby dismissing them without prejudice from this

action; and

B. Denied in all other respects.

3. Defendant Cook shall file his answer within twenty days.

DATED: April 16, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-00821-LKK -KJM Document 57 Filed 04/17/07 Page 2 of 2