Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00711/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00711-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC (C-06-0711)

 

LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (CSB NO. 115163) 

JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB NO. 178058) 

ALBERT L. SIEBER (CSB NO. 233482) 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Defendants 

BINDVIEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 

and SYMANTEC CORPORATION 

NEIL A. SMITH (CSB NO. 63777) 

NATHANIEL BRUNO (CSB NO. 228118) 

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLC 

Four Embarcadero Center, Seventeenth Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415-434-9100 

Facsimile: 415-434-3947 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NETBULA, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NETBULA, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BINDVIEW DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, a Texas corporation; 

SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a 

Delaware corporation; ERIC J. PULASKI, 

an individual; and DOES 1-10 inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C-06-0711-MJJ 

THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO ANSWER OR 

OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

RELATED DATES

Date of Filing Complaint: January 31, 2006 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 13 Filed 05/26/2006 Page 1 of 5
 Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 14 Filed 05/30/06 Page 1 of 5
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC (C-06-0711)

2 

Pursuant to N.D. Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff Netbula, LLC (“Netbula”) and 

Defendants BindView Development Corp. (“BindView”) and Symantec Corp. (“Symantec”), by 

and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate that BindView and Symantec 

shall have up to and including June 15, 2006, to answer or otherwise respond to Netbula’s 

complaint. 

Additionally, Defendant Eric Pulaski (“Pulaski”) has agreed to allow counsel for 

Defendants BindView and Symantec to accept service of the Complaint on his behalf, and that 

the deadline for his response to the Complaint shall be June 15, 2006. Netbula stipulates that Mr. 

Pulaski’s agreement to allow counsel to accept service is without prejudice to any challenge Mr. 

Pulaski may have to personal jurisdiction in this case, which Mr. Pulaski disputes, and Netbula 

will not seek to rely, in whole or in part, on such service or this Stipulation in responding to any 

jurisdictional challenge by Mr. Pulaski. 

The above-named parties also respectfully request an order vacating the dates set by the 

January 31, 2006 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (“Initial 

CMC Order”), and request that the Initial Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for 

June 13, 2006, be continued until June 27, 2006, or other later date according to the Court’s 

calendar. Filing of the Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report, currently scheduled to 

occur no later than June 6, 2006, would occur no later than one week before the rescheduled date for 

the CMC. Finally, the parties request a two-week extension, until June 6, 2006, to file their 

respective ADR Certifications and the Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR Process or 

Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference, originally ordered to be filed by May 23, 2006. 

The reason for this request is to allow the parties to continue settlement discussions and to 

proceed with an informal exchange of documents agreed upon by Symantec, BindView and 

Netbula at an in-person meeting on May 15, 2006. The parties agree that extending the above 

deadlines will facilitate settlement negotiations between the parties and serve the interests of 

judicial economy. 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 13 Filed 05/26/2006 Page 2 of 5
 Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 14 Filed 05/30/06 Page 2 of 5
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC (C-06-0711)

3 

The parties have made no previous request to change the date of the Case Management 

Conference. The Court has not set a trial date, and no other deadlines will be affected by this 

request. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendants Symantec, BindView and 

Pulaski will answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint no later than June 15, 2006. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the parties shall have until June 6, 

2006 to file their respective ADR Certifications and the Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to 

ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Case Management Conference will 

be continued from June 6, 2006 until June 27, 2006, or other later date according to the Court’s 

calendar, with the parties’ Initial Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report to be filed no 

later than one week before this rescheduled date.

Dated: May 26, 2006 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /S/ 

JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD 

Attorneys for Defendants 

BINDVIEW DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION and SYMANTEC 

CORPORATION 

Dated: May 26, 2006 

/ / / 

By: /S/ 

ERIC J. PULASKI 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 13 Filed 05/26/2006 Page 3 of 5
 Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 14 Filed 05/30/06 Page 3 of 5
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC (C-06-0711)

4 

Dated: May 26, 2006 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & 

HAMPTON LLC 

By: /s/ 

NEIL A. SMITH 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NETBULA, LLC 

 

12290/00448/LIT/1246477.2 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 13 Filed 05/26/2006 Page 4 of 5
 Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 14 Filed 05/30/06 Page 4 of 5
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC (C-06-0711)

2 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: , 2006 

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 13 Filed 05/26/2006 Page 5 of 5

Case Management Conference reset for

Tuesday, August 15, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. Joint Case Management Conference Statement due 

8/7/2006. 5/30/2006

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 14 Filed 05/30/06 Page 5 of 5