Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01342/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01342-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO HATRI WOOTEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

WARDEN SCRIBNER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-01342-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADDRESSING MOTION AND

DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT FILING

FEE IN FULL OR FILE APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(Doc. 9)

Plaintiff Mario Hatri Wooten (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on October 11, 2005. However,

plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee in full nor filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

On December 13, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion seeking a court order directing prison officials to

certify his trust account statement. 

Plaintiff shall be provided with a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff

should fill out the application and forward it to the appropriate prison official for completion,

following whatever procedures the institution has in place for processing such applications. 

Based on plaintiff’s motion and in accordance with the court’s practice, it is HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk’s Office shall send plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis;

2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall either

pay the $250.00 filing fee in full or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis;

and

Case 1:05-cv-01342-OWW-LJO Document 10 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01342-OWW-LJO Document 10 Filed 01/11/06 Page 2 of 2