Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca8-07-01640/USCOURTS-ca8-07-01640-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-1640

___________

John Henry Williams, ADC #93081 *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Max Mobley, Chief Deputy, Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Department of Correction; Greg *

Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas * [UNPUBLISHED]

Regional Unit, ADC; Dottie *

Yarbrough, CMS Infirmary Manager, *

East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; *

Shirley Crawford, R.N., East Arkansas *

Regional Unit, ADC; Flora Jones, R.N., *

East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; *

Lisa Montgomery, R.N., East Arkansas *

Regional Unit, ADC; Joseph Spears, *

R.N., East Arkansas Regional Unit, *

ADC; Shelat Farmer, Dr., East *

Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Polly *

James, A.R.O., East Arkansas Regional *

Unit, ADC; Charles E. Jackson, Sgt., *

East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; *

Didi Lockhart, CMS Grievance *

Manager, East Arkansas Regional Unit, *

ADC; Jimmy Banks, Assistant Warden, *

East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, *

originally sued as Terry Banks; Zina *

Ousley, CMS Infirmary Manager, East *

Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, *

originally sued as Zina Ousely; Linda *

Driver, CMS Medical Records, East *

Appellate Case: 07-1640 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2008 Entry ID: 3427650
1

The Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

-2-

Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, *

originally sued as Carolyn Driver, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 24, 2008

Filed: April 28, 2008

___________

Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate John Henry Williams appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant

of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We agree with the district court

that summary judgment was warranted, see Roe v. Crawford, 514 F.3d 789, 793 (8th

Cir. 2008) (standard of review); and that Williams provided no basis under Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b) for reconsidering the grant of summary

judgment, see Christensen v. Qwest Pension Plan, 462 F.3d 913, 919-20 (8th Cir.

2006) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) standard of review); Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998

(8th Cir. 2001) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) standard of review). We decline to consider

Williams’s new evidence and allegations. See Minn. Supply Co. v. Raymond Corp.,

472 F.3d 524, 532 (8th Cir. 2006) (this court considers only evidence before district

court when summary judgment ruling was made); Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-

15 (8th Cir. 2004) (declining to address pro se arguments first raised on appeal).

Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Williams’s pending

motions. 

Appellate Case: 07-1640 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2008 Entry ID: 3427650