Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02995/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02995-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C-04-2995-CRB

sf-1915438

SCOTT BURESH (BAR NO. 70319)

RAMON M. GONZALES (BAR NO. 220891)

BURESH, KAPLAN, JANG & FELLER

2298 Durant Avenue

Berkeley, CA 94704

Telephone: (510) 548-7474; Facsimile: (510) 548-7488

rgonzalez@bkjf.com

J. ROBERT CHAMBERS (Pro Hac Vice)

THEODORE R. REMAKLUS (Pro Hac Vice)

BEVERLY A. LYMAN (Pro Hac Vice)

P. ANDREW BLATT (Pro Hac Vice)

WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP

2700 Carew Tower

441 Vine Street

Cincinnati, OH 45202-2917

Telephone: (513) 241-2324; Facsimile: (513) 241-7269

bchambers@whepatent.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant THERMAGE, INC.

CHARLES S. BARQUIST (SBN 133785)

ANTHONY L. PRESS (SBN 125027)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3500

Los Angeles, California 90013-1024

Telephone: (213) 892-5200; Facsimile: (213) 892-5454

apress@mofo.com

JILL D. NEIMAN (SBN 164702)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: (415) 268-7000; Facsimile: (415) 268-7522

jneiman@mofo.com

Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants

SYNERON MEDICAL LTD. and SYNERON INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

THERMAGE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SYNERON MEDICAL LTD. and

SYNERON INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. C-04-2995-CRB

JOINT STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 3:04-cv-02995-CRB Document 82 Filed 06/09/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C-04-2995-CRB

sf-1915438

1

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

Thermage, Inc. (“Thermage”) and Defendants and Counterclaimants Syneron Medical Ltd. and 

Syneron Inc. (collectively, “Syneron”), through their respective counsel of record, hereby jointly

stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of this entire action as follows:

1. Thermage’s claims regarding the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,755,753, 

5,919,219, 5,948,011, 6,405,090, 6,377,855 and 6,749,624 are dismissed with prejudice in their 

entirety;

2. Syneron’s counterclaims regarding the alleged noninfringement and invalidity of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 5,755,753, 5,919,219, 5,948,011, 6,405,090, 6,377,855 and 6,749,624 and Syneron’s 

counterclaim regarding the alleged unenforceability of U.S. Patent No. 6,749,624 are dismissed with 

prejudice in their entirety;

3. Syneron’s counterclaim regarding the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 

5,569,242 is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety; 

4. Thermage’s counterclaim-in-reply regarding the alleged noninfringement, invalidity 

and unenforceability of U.S. Patent No. 5,569,242 is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety;

5. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs relating to this action.

6. The parties respectfully request that the Court enter the Order attached hereto.

SO STIPULATED:

Dated: June 8, 2005 WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP

By: /S/

J. Robert Chambers

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

THERMAGE, INC.

Case 3:04-cv-02995-CRB Document 82 Filed 06/09/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C-04-2995-CRB

sf-1915438

2

Dated: June 8, 2005 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /S/

Jill D. Neiman

Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants

SYNERON MEDICAL LTD. and SYNERON INC.

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a 

“conformed” signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.

Dated: June 8, 2005 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /S/

Jill D. Neiman

Case 3:04-cv-02995-CRB Document 82 Filed 06/09/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER

CASE NO. C-04-2995-CRB

sf-1915438

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT HEREBY ORDERED THAT

this entire action is dismissed with prejudice as follows:

1. Thermage’s claims regarding the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,755,753, 

5,919,219, 5,948,011, 6,405,090, 6,377,855 and 6,749,624 are dismissed with prejudice in their 

entirety;

2. Syneron’s counterclaims regarding the alleged noninfringement and invalidity of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 5,755,753, 5,919,219, 5,948,011, 6,405,090, 6,377,855 and 6,749,624 and Syneron’s 

counterclaim regarding the alleged unenforceability of U.S. Patent No. 6,749,624 are dismissed with 

prejudice in their entirety;

3. Syneron’s counterclaim regarding the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 

5,569,242 is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety; 

4. Thermage’s counterclaim-in-reply regarding the alleged noninfringement, invalidity and 

unenforceability of U.S. Patent No. 5,569,242 is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety;

5. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

Dated: ________________

_________________________________

Charles R. Breyer

United States District Judge

June 09, 2005

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

APPROVED

A

Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-02995-CRB Document 82 Filed 06/09/05 Page 4 of 4