Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01793/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01793-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT LEE SIMMS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JEFF LYNCH, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:22-cv-01793 AC 

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By order filed May 23, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 

file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and 

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this 

matter to a district court judge. 

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 

Case 2:22-cv-01793-TLN-AC Document 16 Filed 07/22/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: July 22, 2024 

Case 2:22-cv-01793-TLN-AC Document 16 Filed 07/22/24 Page 2 of 2