Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02904/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02904-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LATASHA MCLAUGHLIN, on behalf of

herself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,

Defendant. /

No. C 15-02904 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC

VICE APPLICATION OF

ATTORNEY MATTHEW 

INSLEY-PRUITT

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Matthew Insley-Pruitt (Dkt. No. 32) is

DENIED for failing to comply with Civil Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an

applicant certify that “he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United

States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such

bar” (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such

that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as “the state of Texas” — is

inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court (such as the Supreme

Court of Texas). While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot

be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 26, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-02904-WHA Document 33 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 1