Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00244/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-00244-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CASE NO. C 05 00334 RMW 

EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR DEFS. MOTION CASE NO. C 05 02298 RMW 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. C 06 00244 RMW 

[Attorney list on signature page] 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION 

RAMBUS INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX 

SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX 

SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 

AMERICA INC., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 

SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, 

L.P., 

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, 

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 

U.S.A., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 05-00334 RMW 

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER RE MANUFACTURERS’ 

REQUEST TO EXCEED APPLICABLE 

PAGE LIMIT FOR THEIR MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY 

OF THE FARMWALD PATENTS-INSUIT 

RAMBUS INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 

SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, 

L.P., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 05-02298 RMW 

RAMBUS INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. and MICRON 

SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 06-00244 RMW 

*E-FILED - 10/4/07*

Case 5:06-cv-00244-RMW Document 193 Filed 10/04/07 Page 1 of 4
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO - 1 - CASE NO. C 05 00334 RMW 

EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR DEFS. MOTION CASE NO. C 05 02298 RMW 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. C 06 00244 RMW 

STIPULATION

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, 

that: 

 1. With respect to the motions for summary judgment dependent on claim construction 

that are due to be filed on October 5, 2007 in the above-captioned matters, the Manufacturers (i.e. the 

Hynix, Samsung, Nanya and Micron entities) may file a joint Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement and Invalidity of the patents-in-suit that name Michael Farmwald and Mark Horowitz as 

inventors (the “Farmwald Patents-in-Suit”), not to exceed forty (40) pages in length; and 

 2. Rambus may file an opposition to that Motion, not to exceed forty (40) pages in length; 

and 

 3. The Manufacturers may file a reply to that Rambus opposition, not to exceed twentyfive (25) pages in length. 

 4. The Manufacturers will file no other motions for summary judgment due on October 5, 

2007, regarding the Farmwald Patents-in-Suit. 

 5. This stipulation does not affect motions for summary judgment that the Manufacturers 

may file on the patents-in-suit that name Frederick Ware et al. as inventors or motions for summary 

judgment that Rambus may file. 

Case 5:06-cv-00244-RMW Document 193 Filed 10/04/07 Page 2 of 4
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO - 2 - CASE NO. C 05 00334 RMW 

EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR DEFS. MOTION CASE NO. C 05 02298 RMW 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. C 06 00244 RMW 

Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: September 21, 2007 GEOFFREY H. YOST 

KENNETH L. NISSLY 

THELEN, REID, BROWN, RAYSMAN & STEINER LLP 

KENNETH R. O’ROURKE 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

THEODORE G. BROWN III 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

By: /s/ Theodore G. Brown III

Theodore G. Brown, III 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 

AMERICA INC.

DATED: September 21, 2007 GREGORY P. STONE 

 STEVEN M. PERRY 

 PETER A. DETRE 

 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

 PIERRE J. HUBERT 

 McKOOL SMITH PC 

By: /s/ Peter A. Detre

Peter A. Detre 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

RAMBUS INC. 

DATED: September 21, 2007 ROBERT FREITAS 

CRAIG KAUFMAN 

VICKIE FEEMAN 

ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

By: /s/ Craig Kaufman

Craig Kaufman 

Attorneys for Defendants 

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, 

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A. 

Case 5:06-cv-00244-RMW Document 193 Filed 10/04/07 Page 3 of 4
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO - 3 - CASE NO. C 05 00334 RMW 

EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR DEFS. MOTION CASE NO. C 05 02298 RMW 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. C 06 00244 RMW 

DATED: September 21, 2007 MATTHEW POWERS 

DAVID HEALEY 

ANITA KADALA 

WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

By: /s/ David Healey

David Healey 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG 

SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN 

SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P. 

DATED: September 21, 2007 ROBERT J. BECHER 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES LLP 

JARED BOBROW 

WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

By: /s/ Jared Bobrow

Jared Bobrow 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. and 

MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 4, 2007 By: 

Ronald M. Whyte 

United States District Court Judge

61160548 v1

Case 5:06-cv-00244-RMW Document 193 Filed 10/04/07 Page 4 of 4