Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03548/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03548-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAARMAN CONSTRUCTION, LTD,

Plaintiff,

v.

IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-03548-JST 

ORDER DENYING THE PLAINTIFF'S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO RE-FILE 

STATEMENT OF EVIDENTIARY 

OBJECTIONS

Re: ECF No. 74

Before the Court is the Plaintiff’s motion for leave to re-file its Statement of Objections to 

Defendant’s Evidence as permissible supplementary material under Local Rule 7-3(d). The Court 

denies the Plaintiff’s motion because Civil Local Rules 7-3(a) and (c) require that evidentiary 

objections be included in the opposition or reply briefs, and Civil Local Rule 7-3(d) only allows 

for additional filing after a reply is filed if the opposing party is objecting to new evidence 

submitted in the reply brief. Accordingly, the Court construes the Plaintiff’s motion as an attempt 

to exceed the page limitations outlined in Civil Local Rule 7-4(b). The Court denies the 

Defendant’s request for sanctions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 21, 2016

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-03548-JST Document 76 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 1