Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05634/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05634-44/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re

TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR

TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST

LITIGATION,

___________________________________/

No. C-07-05634 CRB (DMR)

ORDER RE PARTIES’ SUBMISSIONS

RE PROTOCOL FOR REVIEW AND

SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR AIR

CARGO DOCUMENTS 

Plaintiffs moved to compel the production of materials ANA previously produced in parallel

litigation, In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation (“Air Cargo”), Case No. 06-1775-

JGG, pending in the Eastern District of New York (“the Air Cargo materials”). On January 12,

2012, the court conducted a hearing, and on January 18, 2012, the court entered a written order

summarizing the rulings made by the court on the record during the hearing. [Docket No. 621.] The

court directed the parties to meet and confer on a review and selection procedure modeled on the

stipulated procedure in the action In re Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Litigation, Case No.

07-5944-SC (Docket No. 952). The parties met and conferred but were unable to reach agreement,

and on January 26, 2012, the parties submitted a joint letter regarding their respective proposals for

the review and selection procedure of the documents for use in this case. [Docket No. 624.] 

Having considered the submissions of the parties, the court orders the following: the attached

proposed order regarding the designation and production of Air Cargo documents is the court’s

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 627 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

tentative ruling on the parties’ present dispute. If the parties object to any of the provisions, the

parties shall submit a joint letter not to exceed three pages by no later than February 13, 2012

outlining the objections. If the court does not receive a joint letter by February 13, 2012, the

tentative ruling shall become the court’s order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 6, 2012

 DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 3:07-cv-05634-CRB Document 627 Filed 02/06/12 Page 2 of 2