Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00234/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00234-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 1 of 3

EARNEST HENDERSON, et al. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al. USDC, Northern District, Case No. 3:05-CV-0234-VRW

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME TO NOTICE MOTION

SCOT CANDELL, SBN 173261

ROSALIND H. MANSON, SBN 188473

Attorneys at Law

2019 Webster Street

San Francisco, CA 94115

Telephone: (415) 441-1776

Facsimile: (415) 441-1789

LAW OFFICES OF MARK E. MERIN

Mark E. Merin, SBN. 043849

Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild, SBN. 192086

2001 P Street, Suite 100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 443-6911

Facsimile: (916) 447-8336

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

—o0o—

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

—o0o—

EARNEST HENDERSON, JANEL

GOTTA, AARON RAULS, MICHAEL

PEREZ, ARTURO PLEITEZ, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SAN

FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF

PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES, SHERIFF

MICHAEL HENNESSEY, DEPUTY

GLENN YOUNG, DEPUTY MIGUEL

PRADO, DEPUTY LARRY NAPATA,

AND DOES 1 - 11, 

Defendants.

CASE NO: 3:05-CV-00234 VRW

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

SHORTEN NOTICE OF HEARING ON

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT

DATE: September 21, 2006

TIME: 2:00 p.m.

CTRM: 6, 17th Floor

JUDGE: Vaughn R. Walker, Chief Judge

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, by and

through their respective counsel, that notice of plaintiffs’ motion to file amended complaint shall be

shortened so as to allow the motion to be heard on the same date and time as defendants’ motions

for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate presently scheduled to be heard on

Case 3:05-cv-00234-VRW Document 82 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-00234-VRW Document 111 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 2 of 3

EARNEST HENDERSON, et al. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al. USDC, Northern District, Case No. 3:05-CV-0234-VRW

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME TO NOTICE MOTION

September 21, 2006, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 6. Plaintiffs’ motion shall be filed and served by

ECF concurrently with the filing of this Stipulation which shall be filed on or before August 23,

2006.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that defendants shall file and serve by ECF

their opposition to plaintiffs’ motion to file amended compliant no later than on September 7, 2006.

Immediately below the date, time and place of the hearing, the opposition papers must include the

following notation:OPPOSITIONFILED ON _______________ PURSUANT TO STIPULATION

AND ORDER ISSUED ON ___________. Copies of all papers must be lodged in Courtroom 6

within 24 hours of filing.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that plaintiffs shall file and serve by ECF

their reply to defendants’ opposition to their motion to file amended complaint no later than

September 14, 2006. Copies of all papers must be lodged in Courtroom 6 within 24 hours of filing.

DATED: August 23, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

SCOT CANDELL and

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 

/s/ - “Scot Candell”

BY: 

Scot Candell

Attorney for Plaintiffs

DATED: August 22, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

DENNIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, Chief Trial Deputy 

PETER J. KEITH

RONALD FLYNN 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN 

Deputy City Attorneys 

/s/ - “Peter J. Keith”

BY: 

Peter J. Keith, Deputy City Attorney

Attorney for Defendants

Case 3:05-cv-00234-VRW Document 82 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-00234-VRW Document 111 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 3 of 3

EARNEST HENDERSON, et al. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al. USDC, Northern District, Case No. 3:05-CV-0234-VRW

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME TO NOTICE MOTION

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the date by which notice of plaintiffs’ motion to file

amended complaint is shortened so as to allow the motion to be heard on the same date and time as

defendants’motions for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate presentlyscheduled

to be heard on September 21, 2006, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 6. Plaintiffs motion is deemed filed

and served by ECF as of the date this Stipulation was filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall file and serve by ECF their opposition to

plaintiffs’ motion to file amended compliant no later than September 11, 2006. Immediately below

the date, time and place of the hearing, the opposition papers must include the following notation:

OPPOSITION FILED ON [date] PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND ORDER ISSUED ON

___________. Copies of all papers must be lodged in Courtroom 6 within 24 hours of filing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall file and serve by ECF their reply to

defendants’ opposition to their motion to file amended complaint no later than September 18, 2006.

Copies of all papers must be lodged in Courtroom 6 within 24 hours of filing.

DATED: 

 

HON. VAUGHN R. WALKER, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT

S:\WpWork\Henderson, Earnest\Pleadings\Stip & Order to Shorten Time to Hear Motion to File Amended Complaint.wpd

Case 3:05-cv-00234-VRW Document 82 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 3 of 3

9/5/2006

Case 3:05-cv-00234-VRW Document 111 Filed 09/05/06 Page 3 of 3