Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02759/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02759-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST

LITIGATION

 /

This Order Relates to:

ALL CASES

 /

No. M 07-1827 SI

MDL. No. 1827

PRETRIAL ORDER #1 AND AGENDA

FOR JULY 10, 2007 STATUS

CONFERENCE

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has transferred to this Court for

coordinated pretrial proceedings certain antitrust actions relating to an alleged conspiracy to fix the

prices for thin film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) panels, which are used in computer

monitors, flat panel television sets, and other electronic devices. As the number and complexity of these

actions warrant holding a single, coordinated initial status conference for all actions in In Re: TFT-LCD

(Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1827, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. APPLICABILITY OF ORDER: Prior to the initial conference and entry of a

comprehensive order governing all further proceedings in this case, the provisions of this Order shall

govern the practice and procedure in those actions that were transferred to this Court by the JPML. This

Order also applies to all related actions filed in all divisions of the Northern District of California and

all “tag-along actions” later filed in, removed to, or transferred to this Court.

2. CONSOLIDATION: The civil actions transferred to this Court or related to the actions

already pending before this Court are consolidated for pretrial purposes only. Any “tag-along actions”

Case 3:07-cv-02759-SI Document 18 Filed 07/03/07 Page 1 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

later filed in, removed to, or transferred to this Court, or directly filed in the Northern District of

California, will automatically be consolidated with this action without the necessity of future motions

or orders. This consolidation does not constitute a determination that the actions should be consolidated

for trial, nor does it have the effect of making any entity a party to any action in which he, she or it has

not been named, served or added in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

3. DATE OF INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE AND AGENDA FOR CONFERENCE:

Matters relating to pretrial and discovery proceedings in these cases will be addressed at an initial status

conference to be held on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge Susan Illston in the

Ceremonial Courtroom, 19th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,

California. Counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Manual for Complex Litigation,

Fourth (“MCL 4th”) and be prepared at the conference to suggest procedures that will facilitate the

expeditious, economical and just resolution of this litigation. The agenda for the July 10, 2007

conference is included at paragraph 12, below.

4. INITIAL CONFERENCE APPEARANCES: Each party represented by counsel shall

appear at the initial status conference through the party’s attorney who will have primary responsibility

for the party’s interest in this litigation. Parties not represented by counsel may appear in person or

through an authorized and responsible agent. To minimize costs and facilitate a manageable conference,

parties with similar interests may agree, to the extent practicable, to have an attending attorney represent

the party’s interest at the conference. A party will not by designating an attorney to represent the party’s

interest at the conference be precluded from other representation during the litigation, nor will

attendance at the conference waive objections to jurisdiction, venue or service.

5. RESPONSE EXTENSION AND STAY: Defendants are granted an extension of time

for responding by motion or answer to the complaint(s) until a date to be set by this Court. Pending the

initial conference and further orders of this Court, all outstanding discovery proceedings are stayed, and

no further discovery shall be initiated. Moreover, all pending motions must be renoticed for resolution

Case 3:07-cv-02759-SI Document 18 Filed 07/03/07 Page 2 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

on a motion day or days after the initial case management conference.

6. MASTER DOCKET FILE: The Clerk of the Court will maintain a master docket case

file under the style “In Re: TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation,” No. M 07-1827 SI, and the

identification of “MDL No. 1827.” When a pleading is intended to apply to all actions, this shall be

indicated by the words: “This Document Relates to All Cases.” When a pleading is intended to apply

to fewer than all cases, this Court’s docket number of each individual case to which the document relates

shall appear immediately after the words “This Document Relates to.”

7. FILING: This case is subject to Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”), pursuant to General

Order 45, Section VI of which requires that all documents in such a case be filed electronically. General

Order 45 provides at Section IV(A) that “Each attorney of record is obligated to become an ECF User

and be assigned a user ID and password for access to the system upon designation of the action as being

subject to ECF.” If she or she has not already done so, counsel shall register forthwith as an ECF user

and be issued an ECF user ID and password. Forms and instructions can be found on the Court’s web

site at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov. 

All documents shall be e-filed in the master file, No. M 07-1827 SI. Documents that pertain to

one or only some of the pending actions shall also be e-filed in the individual case(s) to which the

documents pertain.

8. DOCKETING NEW CASES: When an action that properly belongs as part of In Re:

TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation is filed after the date of this Order in the Northern District

of California or transferred here from another court, the Clerk of this Court shall:

a. File a copy of this Order in the separate file for such action;

b. Make an appropriate entry on the master docket sheet;

c. Mail to the attorneys for the plaintiff in the newly filed or transferred case a copy of this

Order; and

d. Upon the first appearance of any new defendant, mail to the attorneys for the defendant

Case 3:07-cv-02759-SI Document 18 Filed 07/03/07 Page 3 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

in such newly filed or transferred cases a copy of this Order.

9. APPEARANCES: Counsel who appeared in a transferor court prior to transfer need not

enter an additional appearance before this Court. Moreover, attorneys admitted to practice and in good

standing in any United States District Court are admitted pro hac vice in this litigation, and the

requirements of Northern District of California Local Rule 11-3 are waived. Association of local

counsel is not required.

10. PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE: All parties and their counsel are reminded of their

duty to preserve evidence that may be relevant to this action. The duty extends to documents, data and

tangible things in the possession, custody and control of the parties to this action, and any employees,

agents, contractors, carriers, bailees, or other non-parties who possess materials reasonably anticipated

to be subject to discovery in this action. “Documents, data and tangible things” shall be interpreted

broadly to include writings, records, files, correspondence, reports, memoranda, calendars, diaries,

minutes, electronic messages, voice mail, e-mail, telephone message records or logs, computer and

network activity logs, hard drives, backup data, removable computer storage media such as tapes, discs

and cards, printouts, document image files, Web pages, databases, spreadsheets, software, books,

ledgers, journals, orders, invoices, bills, vouchers, checks statements, worksheets, summaries,

compilations, computations, charts, diagrams, graphic presentations, drawings, films, charts, digital or

chemical process photographs, video, phonographic, tape or digital recordings, or transcripts thereof,

drafts, jottings and notes, studies or drafts of studies or other similar such material. Information that

serves to identify, locate or link such material, such as file inventories, file folders, indices, and

metadata, is also included in this definition. Until the parties agree on a preservation plan or the Court

orders otherwise, each party shall take reasonable steps to preserve all documents, data and tangible

things containing information potentially relevant to the subject matter of this litigation. Counsel is

under an obligation to the Court to exercise all reasonable efforts to identify and notify parties and nonparties, including employees of corporate or institutional parties.

Case 3:07-cv-02759-SI Document 18 Filed 07/03/07 Page 4 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

11. FILING OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS: In accordance with Rule 5(d) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, discovery requests and responses are not to be filed with the Clerk nor sent

to the Judge’s Chambers, except to the extent needed in connection with a motion.

12. AGENDA FOR JULY 10, 2007 STATUS CONFERENCE: The items listed in MCL

4th Sections 22.61, 22.62 and 22.63 will be addressed generally at the conference. In addition, the

Court intends to address the following specific items at the initial status conference:

a. Liaison Counsel: The Court intends to appoint Liaison Counsel, who will be charged

with administrative responsibilities arising from the pretrial coordination of these multiple actions,

including communication with the Court. The Court anticipates appointing at least one Liaison Counsel

for the direct purchaser plaintiffs, one for the indirect purchaser plaintiffs, one for the defendants and,

if ultimately necessary, one for governmental/parens patriae parties. Liaison Counsel may or may not

be among such interim co-lead counsel as are appointed hereafter, but the Liaison responsibilities shall

be primarily administrative in nature. Prior to the initial conference, counsel for the plaintiffs and

counsel for the defendants shall, to the extent they have not already done so, confer and seek consensus

on the selection of a candidate for the position of Liaison Counsel for each group mentioned above.

Liaison Counsel shall be required to maintain complete files with copies of all documents served upon

them and shall make such files available to parties within their liaison group upon request. Liaison

Counsel will also be authorized to receive orders and notices from the Judicial Panel on Multi District

Litigation pursuant to Rule 5.2(e) of the JPML’s Rules of Procedure or from the transferee court on

behalf of all parties within their liaison group and shall be responsible for the preparation and transmittal

of copies of such orders and notices to the parties in their liaison group. The expenses incurred in

performing the services of Liaison Counsel shall be shared equally by all members of the liaison group

in a manner agreeable to the parties or set by the Court failing such agreement. Appointment of Liaison

Counsel shall be subject to the approval of the Court. 

b. Interim Lead Counsel: By separate order after the July 10, 2007 status conference, the

Case 3:07-cv-02759-SI Document 18 Filed 07/03/07 Page 5 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

Court will appoint Interim Lead Class Counsel for the direct purchaser plaintiffs and the indirect

purchaser plaintiffs. The Court anticipates appointing two Interim Co-Lead Counsel for the direct

purchaser group and two for the indirect purchaser group. Subject to Court approval, Interim Co-Lead

Counsel for each group will be asked to suggest a workable, efficient and economical organization

structure for their groups, taking into account the geographical and technical needs of the litigation.

Each lawyer seeking appointment as Lead Counsel shall file by July 9, 2007, a statement listing (1) all

of the TFT-LCD cases in which his/her law firm is counsel of record, (2) for each of those cases, the

name and address of each plaintiff as well as a brief description of the plaintiff’s business and general

volume of purchases of TFT-LCD products, and (3) whether the law firm represents both direct and

indirect purchasers. 

c. Substantive groupings of cases: Counsel shall be prepared to discuss the different

substantive groups that these cases fall into (direct purchasers versus indirect purchasers, whether there

are any foreign purchaser plaintiffs, possible parens patriae actions, etc.), how many cases are in each

group, and what different state antitrust laws are involved. The Court is also interested in the status, to

the extent known, of any government investigations of the TFT-LCD industry, in the United States or

elsewhere. 

d. Status of service of process: Counsel shall report on the status of service of process on

all defendants.

e. Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 127 S. Ct. 1955 (May 21, 2007): Counsel are instructed to

familiarize themselves with this recent Supreme Court case and be prepared to discuss what impact, if

any, it is expected to have on the preparation of any consolidated amended pleadings.

f. Monthly statements regarding time spent and costs advanced: All attorneys who may

ever seek the award of fees or reimbursement of costs in connection with this litigation shall keep files

contemporaneously documenting all time spent, including tasks performed, and expenses incurred. The

Case 3:07-cv-02759-SI Document 18 Filed 07/03/07 Page 6 of 7
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7

Court will consult with Interim Co-Lead Counsel and Liaison Counsel concerning how and where these

files shall be preserved pending completion of the litigation. 

g. Discovery and Protective Order: Counsel should be prepared to discuss mechanisms for

coordinating discovery between the direct and indirect purchaser actions, and the effect, if any, of the

government investigations of the TFT-LCD industry on the discovery process. Counsel shall also be

prepared to discuss a stipulated protective order and, if possible, present one to the Court for its

consideration. In the event a stipulation cannot be reached, the Court will execute a protective order

generally in the form to the Northern District of California’s model stipulated protective order

unless/until the parties present the Court with a joint submission.

h. Appointment of Judge Fern Smith as Special Master: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 53(b)(1), the Court hereby provides all parties notice that it is considering appointing the

Honorable Fern Smith, United States District Judge (Retired), as a Special Master to assist the Court

in this litigation. The Court anticipates that Judge Smith would assist the Court with matters such as

case management, discovery organization and structuring, prioritization of class considerations, case

resolution procedures, and other matters in which the large scale of this litigation will make Special

Master assistance prudent and economical. Counsel shall be prepared at the July 10, 2007 status

conference to discuss this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 3, 2007 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-02759-SI Document 18 Filed 07/03/07 Page 7 of 7