Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07483/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-07483-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

PROPOSED ORDER APPROVING 

MINOR’S COMPROMISE 

AMIN V. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 

Case No.: C 06 07483 PJH 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB# 159747 

DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ., CSB# 236458 

THE LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL 

925 West Hedding Street 

San Jose, California 95126 

T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0203 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

MIRVAT AMIN, individually, and 

SAMI AMIN, individually and as 

Guardian Ad Litem for his minor children 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(San Francisco Division) 

SAMI AMIN, et al., ) Case No.: C 06 07483 PJH 

) 

 Plaintiffs, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING 

) PETITION FOR MINOR’S 

) COMPROMISE 

vs. ) 

) 

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

____________________________________) 

Plaintiffs herein, by and through their counsel, submitted a Petition for Court Approval of 

Minor’s Compromise of Claims on May 23, 2007, pertaining to a settlement that all plaintiffs 

had reached with the County of San Mateo and the individually named employee-defendants 

of the County of San Mateo. The court also received a Statement of Non-Opposition from 

counsel for defendants. 

Upon review of the file and consideration of the Petition, the Declaration of plaintiffs’ 

counsel and supporting documentation submitted therewith, and the opposition and/or nonCase 4:06-cv-07483-PJH Document 39 Filed 05/25/07 Page 1 of 2
PROPOSED ORDER APPROVING 

MINOR’S COMPROMISE 

AMIN V. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 

Case No.: C 06 07483 PJH 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

opposition of any other defendant provided to the court prior to the making of this order, the 

court does hereby find and order as follows: 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, 

1. The minor’s claims against the defendant County of San Mateo, and the individually 

named employee-defendants thereof, as compromised pursuant to the terms of the 

Settlement Agreement and General release, and the (Non-Qualified) Assignment and 

Release (of Periodic Payment Obligation), (referred to collectively herein as the 

“settlement documents”), attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, is approved. 

Plaintiffs’ counsel may attach the fully executed settlement documents, when obtained, to 

this Order for purposes of submitting same to Prudential Life Insurance Company. 

2. The court approves of the dismissal of all claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall 

submit such dismissal promptly after the annuity/annuities set forth in the settlement 

documents have been funded. 

3. The court approves the distribution of attorney fees to plaintiffs’ counsel, and the 

reimbursement of costs, as set forth in the Petition. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: ___/___/2007 ________________________ 

 HON. PHYLLIS HAMILTON 

 United States District Judge 

5 25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-07483-PJH Document 39 Filed 05/25/07 Page 2 of 2