Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-06033/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-06033-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:15-cv-06033-HSG STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER

ROSEMARY M. RIVAS (Bar No. 209147)

rrivas@finkelsteinthompson.com

FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP

1 California Street, Suite 900

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-8700

Facsimile: (415) 398-8704

Counsel for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN HALEY, et al., 

 Plaintiff,

 v.

MACY’S INC., et al.,

 Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-06033-HSG

(Consolidated with:

3:16-cv-01252-HSG,

3:16-cv-02850-HSG, and

3:16-cv-03341-HSG)

STIPULATION & ORDER TO MODIFY 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint on 

November 17, 2016 and set a hearing for February 2, 2017; 

WHEREAS, under the current briefing schedule, Plaintiffs’ opposition brief is due on 

December 8, 2016 and Defendants’ reply is due on December 29, 2016; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs seek to meet and confer with Defendants about some of the issues 

raised in the motion to dismiss to determine whether any can be resolved informally;

ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows:

Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before December 12, 

2016 and Defendants’ reply brief shall be filed on or before January 5, 2017. The hearing on the 

motion to dismiss will remain the same.

Case 4:15-cv-06033-HSG Document 46 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:15-cv-06033-HSG -2- STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 

DATED: December 8, 2016 FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP

By: /s/ Rosemary M. Rivas

 Rosemary M. Rivas

Counsel for Plaintiffs

DATED: December 8, 2016 SEDGWICK LLP

By: /s/ Stephanie Sheridan 

Stephanie Sheridan

Counsel for Defendants

ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation and good cause being shown, the Court hereby 

GRANTS the parties’ Stipulation. The Court hereby orders as follows:

1. Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before December 

12, 2016 and Defendants’ reply brief shall be filed on or before January 5, 2017. The hearing on 

the motion to dismiss shall remain the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: December 9, 2016 ___________________________

 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

 United States District Court Judge

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1 regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that 

the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories.

/s/ Rosemary M. Rivas 

Rosemary M. Rivas

Case 4:15-cv-06033-HSG Document 46 Filed 12/09/16 Page 2 of 2