Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-1_05-cv-01152/USCOURTS-almd-1_05-cv-01152-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DANNY LEE STEWART, # 3143130 )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 1:05-CV-1152-WKW-

) VPM (WO)

LEON FORNISS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

ORDER

On January 9, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 6) in this case that

the cause of action is due to be dismissed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) because this

Court is not authorized to consider the petitioner’s successive habeas application without

authorization of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Petitioner failed to timely file objections;

however, he filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. # 8). On January 25, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed

a Recommendation (Doc. # 9) concluding that the Motion to Dismiss is due to be denied as moot.

Petitioner filed a timely objection on February 9, 2006 (Doc. # 10).

After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and

DECREE of the Court that:

1. The Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED.

2. The plaintiff’s petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED.

3. This cause of action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE this the 14 day of March, 2006. th

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01152-WKW-VPM Document 11 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Case 1:05-cv-01152-WKW-VPM Document 11 Filed 03/14/06 Page 2 of 2