Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00873/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00873-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Phillip Dunn,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Matthew Cate, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-0873-PHX-NVW

ORDER

Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Withdraw Case With Leave to Amend (doc. 62) is

not really a motion to dismiss his own case but a motion to vacate the prior discovery and

dispositive motion deadlines, now that Defendant has filed a Motion for Summary

Judgment, and to start this case over with a new amended complaint. The motion is

utterly without justification. All parties have had fair notice to prepare their case, and the

opposing party would be prejudiced by allowing Plaintiff to abandon this case and start a

new one. The Court’s expenditure of substantial resources on this case would be wasted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Withdraw

Case With Leave to Amend (doc. 62) is denied.

DATED this 10 day of August, 2010.

th

Case 1:08-cv-00873-NVW Document 63 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 1