Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01238/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01238-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OLIVER VANN,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. HERNANDEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01238-LJO-SMS PC

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Doc. 32)

Plaintiff Oliver Vann, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on

August 24, 2007, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and California law. This action is proceeding on

Plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed April 25, 2008, against Defendants Melendez, Hernandez, and

McBride for use of excessive force, denial of equal protection, and retaliation.

On March 23, 2010, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff failed to file

an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, it

is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’

motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days from the date of service of

this order; and

///

///

///

///

1

Case 1:07-cv-01238-LJO -SMS Document 33 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 The failure to respond to Defendants’ motion in compliance with this order will

result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:07-cv-01238-LJO -SMS Document 33 Filed 06/25/10 Page 2 of 2