Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01038/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01038-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES D. MACIEL,

Plaintiff, 2:03-cv-1038-GEB-PAN- P

vs.

EDWARD ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On March 24, 2006, the magistrate judge recommended this action be dismissed pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1915(g). On July 7, 2006, the court adopted the findings and recommendations in

full and dismissed this action. Judgment duly was entered. July 20, 2006, plaintiff filed

objections to the findings and recommendations. The court construes the objections as a request

for relief from judgment. 

Federal rule governs granting relief from judgment:

On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a

party or a party’s legal representative from a final judgment, order

or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence,

surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence

which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to

move for a new trial under rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether heretofore

denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other

misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the

judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged, or a prior 

Case 2:03-cv-01038-GEB-PAN Document 28 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise

vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have

prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief

from the operation of the judgment.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Plaintiff presents no facts or argument that justify granting relief from

judgment.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s July 20, 2006, request is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 29, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cv-01038-GEB-PAN Document 28 Filed 08/29/06 Page 2 of 2