Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-2_08-cv-00220/USCOURTS-ared-2_08-cv-00220-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

EASTERN DIVISION

S&S SALES, INC. PLAINTIFF

vs 2:08CV00220-WRW

PANCHO’S MEXICAN FOODS, INC.,

Successor in interest by way of merger with

PANCHO’S DISTRIBUTING CO., INC., and

PANCHO’S MANAGEMENT, INC., and

ASSOCIATED WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

On February 18, 2010, a telephone conference was held with counsel of record concerning

the Defendants’ document production in this case as well as other matters. The Court hereby orders

and directs the following:

1. Defendant Pancho’s Mexican Foods, Inc. is directed to provide Plaintiff with an

affidavit of a corporate representative from Brewer Detective Service, Inc. stating that he or she has

taken the reasonable and necessary steps to identify, locate, and produce all documents that relate

in any way to the contract between Brewer Detective Service, Inc., and the law firm of Martin Tate

Morrow & Marston, P.C. (Specifically including, but not limited to, Earl Houston) and/or Pancho’s

Mexican Foods, Inc. These documents shall specifically include, but not be limited to, all

documents describing or reflecting the instructions and/or limitations provided to Brewer Detective

Service, Inc. in connection with any and all services provided by Brewer Detective Service, Inc. to

Martin Tate Morrow & Marston, P.C. (Specifically including, but not limited to, Earl Houston)

and/or Pancho’s Mexican Foods, Inc. 

Case 2:08-cv-00220-BRW Document 51 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 2
2. Defendants has been ordered to produce the requested updated sales information as

well as the indemnification Agreement entered into between the Defendants in this matter by 5:00

on Friday, February 19, 2010. 

3. Pancho’s has confirmed that it does not possess any of the requested sales tickets and,

therefore, that issue is now moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of February, 2010.

 /s/Wm. R. Wilson, Jr.

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:08-cv-00220-BRW Document 51 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 2