Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05870/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05870-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

---

STIPULATION RE EXTENDING DISCOVERY 

DEADLINES 

CASE NO. CO6-05870 MHP

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FANIA E. DAVIS, SBN 87268 

MOORE AND MOORE 

445 Bellevue Avenue, Second Floor 

Oakland, CA 94610 

Telephone Number: (510) 451-0104 

Facsimile: (510) 451-5056 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ANTIA LELAIND 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, SBN 139669 

City Attorney 

ELIZABETH S. SALVESON, SBN 83788

Chief Labor Attorney 

RAFAL OFIERSKI, SBN 194798

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 5th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3825 

Facsimile: (415) 554-4248 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 

CHRIS LOGIA, DAN GILMAN, and HERB DANG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTIA LELAIND, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO; PUBLIC UTILITIES 

COMMISSION; DAN GILMAN, in his 

individual and official capacities; CHRIS 

LOGIA, in his individual and official 

capacities; HERB DANG, in his individual 

and official capacities; and DOES 1 

THROUGH 50, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No. C06-05870 MHP

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

DEADLINE TO COMPLETE 

DISCLOSURES AND OTHER 

DISCOVERY AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Case 3:06-cv-05870-MHP Document 67 Filed 12/19/07 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION RE EXTENDING DISCOVERY 

DEADLINES 

CASE NO. CO6-05870 MHP

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff ANTIA LELAIND and Defendants CITY AND

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, CHRIS LOGIA, 

DAN GILMAN, and HERB DANG hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on December 3, 2007; 

and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff is currently in the process of preparing her opposition to the 

motion; 

WHEREAS, following the hearing on Plaintiff’s discovery motion on October 29, 

2007, the Court ordered a further deposition of Plaintiff to determine any relationship 

between the events during 2005 and the events occurring during the entire term of her 

employment; 

WHEREAS, due to the November 7, 2007 passing of her mother, Plaintiff’s counsel 

was traveling and out of the office for approximately three weeks in November; and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel’s unavoidable absence from her office resulted in a 

significant work backlog; 

WHEREAS, in part due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s unavailability in November and in part 

due to the physician’s schedule in early December, Plaintiff could not be scheduled for a Rule 

35 examination until December 13, 2007; and 

 WHEREAS, the current scheduling order sets forth the following deadlines: 

(1) Lay witness disclosures for case-in chief 12/15/07 

(2) Expert Disclosures 12/17/07 

(3) Expert Discovery Cut-Off 1/21/08; and 

Case 3:06-cv-05870-MHP Document 67 Filed 12/19/07 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION RE EXTENDING DISCOVERY 

DEADLINES 

CASE NO. CO6-05870 MHP

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, there have been two previous time modifications to extend the deadlines

for early ADR and dispositive motions in this case; and 

WHEREAS, the proposed extension of time will not alter any other deadlines 

previously set by the Court in this case. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIUPLATED AND AGREED AS 

FOLLOWS: 

1. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 16 and pursuant to Local 

Rules, the foregoing constitutes the requisite good cause to request modification of the Case 

Scheduling Order; 

2. The Parties propose that the trial and pretrial schedule remain the same, but that 

the following modifications be made to the current Case Scheduling Order: 

(1) Lay witness disclosures Cut-Off 12/22/07 

(2) Expert Disclosures Cut-Off 1/11/08 

(3) Expert Discovery Cut-Off 2/5/08 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Case 3:06-cv-05870-MHP Document 67 Filed 12/19/07 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION RE EXTENDING DISCOVERY 

DEADLINES 

CASE NO. CO6-05870 MHP

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: December 14, 2007 MOORE & MOORE 

 /s/ 

FANIA E. DAVIS, ESQ. 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ANTIA LELAIND 

Dated: December 14, 2007 DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

ELIZABETH S. SALVESON 

Chief Labor Attorney 

By: /s/ 

RAFAL OFIERSKI 

Deputy City Attorney 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 

CHRIS LOGIA, DAN GILMAN, and HERB DANG 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

BASED ON THE ABOVE STIPULATION and for good cause, 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________ By _________________________________ 

 HONORABLE MARILYN HALL PATEL 

 United States District Court Judge 

12/19/2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-05870-MHP Document 67 Filed 12/19/07 Page 4 of 4