Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01194/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01194-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

Sanford v. Rusty Duck, et al., Case No. CIV.S 05-1194 LKK GGH 

Stipulation to Continue Expert Disclosures and Rebuttal Expert Disclosures 

- 1 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

James Sanford, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Crab Addison, Inc. dba Rusty 

Duck, et al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CIV.S 05-1194 LKK GGH

Stipulation to Amend the 

Scheduling Order and Order 

Thereon 

Complaint Filed: June 13, 2005 

Pretrial Conference: April 23, 2007 

Lynn Hubbard, III, SBN 69773 

Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV, SBN 212970 

Law Offices of Lynn Hubbard 

12 Williamsburg Lane 

Chico, CA 95926 

Telephone: (530) 895-3252 

Facsimile: (530) 894-8244 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01194-LKK -GGH Document 21 Filed 10/06/06 Page 1 of 3
Sanford v. Rusty Duck, et al., Case No. CIV.S 05-1194 LKK GGH 

Stipulation to Continue Expert Disclosures and Rebuttal Expert Disclosures 

- 2 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties were served with the Status (Pre-trial 

Scheduling) Order (hereinafter “Scheduling Order) on August 25, 2005 in this 

matter; 

WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order provides that on or before October 

31, 2006, each party shall comply with the disclosure provisions as set forth 

in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 

(hereinafter “FRCP”); 

WHEREAS, the parties are currently engaged in settlement 

negotiations and are unable to coordinate a date for the Rule 34 Site 

Inspection the beginning of October and plaintiff’s expert will not have 

sufficient time to prepare his report. Therefore, the parties seek to extend the 

dates for disclosures under FRCP 26(a)(2)(A) and (B). 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the 

parties that the Scheduling Order be amended as follows: 

1. On or before November 6, 2006 each party shall comply with the 

disclosure provisions set forth in FRCP 26(a)(2)(A) and (B); 

2. Nothing in this Stipulation shall be construed to effect any other 

date set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order, as all other dates shall remain 

the same. 

Dated: October 5, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD 

 /s/ Lynn Hubbard, Esquire 

 LYNN HUBBARD, III 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01194-LKK -GGH Document 21 Filed 10/06/06 Page 2 of 3
Sanford v. Rusty Duck, et al., Case No. CIV.S 05-1194 LKK GGH 

Stipulation to Continue Expert Disclosures and Rebuttal Expert Disclosures 

- 3 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: October 2, 2006 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO 

 /s/ Martin Orlick, Esquire 

 MARTIN H. ORLICK 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 CRAB ADDISON, INC. dba RUSTY DUCK 

Order

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

that: 

1. On or before November 6, 2006 each party shall comply with the 

disclosure provisions set forth in FRCP 26(a)(2)(A) and (B); 

2. Nothing in this Stipulation shall be construed to effect any other 

date set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order, as all other dates shall remain 

the same. 

Dated: October 5, 2006 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:05-cv-01194-LKK -GGH Document 21 Filed 10/06/06 Page 3 of 3