Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04030/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04030-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNISON RAVAL, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 15-CV-4030 YGR

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-2(a) and 16-9, Plaintiff was required to serve a copy of the 

order setting the initial case management conference along with the summons and complaint, and to 

file a joint or separate case management statement no less than seven days prior to the conference. 

Pro se Plaintiff Dennison Raval filed the present lawsuit on September 3, 2015. Plaintiff has not 

yet filed proof of service upon Defendants America’s Servicing Company and NDEX West LLC 

(“Defendants”) and has not filed a case management statement in advance of the initial case 

management conference set for December 7, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 11.) No such case 

management statement has been filed, and it appears that Defendants have not yet been served. 

The case management conference currently set for December 7, 2015, is CONTINUED to 

February 29, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., United States Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland. 

Plaintiff is cautioned that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires the filing of proof 

of service of Defendants with a summons and complaint no later than January 1, 2016. See

F.R.Civ.P. 4(m) (under version of rule in effect at the time of filing, service required within 120 

Case 4:15-cv-04030-YGR Document 12 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

days). If Plaintiff fails to serve the summons and complaint, or to file a motion for extension of 

time to serve setting forth good cause reasons why Defendants have not yet been served, by January 

1, 2016, the complaint herein will be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: December 3, 2015 _______________________________________ 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:15-cv-04030-YGR Document 12 Filed 12/03/15 Page 2 of 2