Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00088/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00088-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE BLAINE,

Plaintiff,

v.

DARRELL ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-00088-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON

DEFENDANTS GONZALES AND HAN

WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Docs. 35 and 36)

Plaintiff Vance Blaine (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 28, 2006, the court issued an order

directing the United States Marshal to initiate service on eight defendants. Five defendants waived

service and answered the complaint, but service was returned un-executed as to three defendants.

The Marshal was informed that more information, such as the first names of the defendants, is

needed. 

There is one physician by the last name of Dwivedi listed with the Medical Board of

California, and the Marshal was directed to again initiate service on defendant Dwivedi. However,

defendants Gonzales and Han’s last names are too common to allow the court to ascertain their

addresses from the Medical Board. Plaintiff shall be given the opportunity to provide additional

information on defendants Gonzales and Han. Most useful would be a medical record containing

each defendant’s name.

///

///

Case 1:05-cv-00088-DGC Document 42 Filed 11/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Therefore, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of service

of this order, plaintiff shall provide the court with further identifying information on defendants

Gonzales and Han. If plaintiff fails to comply with this order, plaintiff will be required to show

cause why defendants Gonzales and Han should not be dismissed from this action. Fed. R. Civ. P.

4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 13, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

i0d3h8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00088-DGC Document 42 Filed 11/14/06 Page 2 of 2