Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01520/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01520-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Farnam Companies, Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Stabar Enterprises, Inc.; Barbara Allen and

Stacy Allen, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-1520 PHX NVW

ORDER

Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Re Count One

(Declaration of Patent Invalidity) of Plaintiff's Complaint (doc. #11), and Farnam's Reply

(doc. #42). Defendant Stabar has not filed a response to the motion, and the time to file a

response has expired. Farnam states that Stabar's failure to respond was intentional and done

in consideration of other concessions from Farnam.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Re

Count One (Declaration of Patent Invalidity) (doc. #11) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Farnam shall advise the court promptly

whether it requests entry of an immediate declaratory judgment of invalidity of the patent

certified as final under Rule 54(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and if so, shall submit a form of

judgment, to which defendant Stabar may submit objections no later than seven days after

the submission of a form of judgment.

Case 2:05-cv-01520-NVW Document 48 Filed 10/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the oral argument set October 13, 2005.

DATED this 5th day of October, 2005.

Case 2:05-cv-01520-NVW Document 48 Filed 10/05/05 Page 2 of 2