Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01284/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01284-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVERETT GALINDO GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

DERRAL G. ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

1:09-cv-01284-DAD-SKO (PC)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS 

TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

and PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE 

PRIOR MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE 

OBJECTIONS

(Docs. 94, 95, 96)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. '

1983. On February 16, 2016, three motions from Plaintiff were filed -- a motion for a thirty day 

extension of time to file objections to the pending findings and recommendations (Doc. 94); a 

motion to strike that motion for an extension of time as being incorrectly dated (Doc. 95); and a 

correctly dated motion for a thirty day extension of time from February 22, 2016 to file objections 

to the pending findings and recommendations to grant Defendants’ motion for judgment on the 

pleadings (Doc. 96). 

Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING 

THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 95) to strike his incorrectly dated motion (Doc. 94) for 

extension of time to file objections to the pending findings and recommendations

is GRANTED;

Case 1:09-cv-01284-DAD-SKO Document 97 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

(2) Plaintiff’s incorrectly dated motion (Doc. 94) for extension of time to file 

objections to the pending findings and recommendations is STRICKEN; and

(3) Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 96) for a thirty day extension of time from February 22, 

2016 is GRANTED;

(4) Plaintiff has until March 23, 2016 in which to file objections to the pending 

findings and recommendations to grant Defendants’ motion for judgment on the 

pleadings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 26, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-01284-DAD-SKO Document 97 Filed 02/26/16 Page 2 of 2