Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-06106/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-06106-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

CASE NO: C09-06106 CRB ADR 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Ulrico S. Rosales, SBN 139809

urosales@wsgr.com 

Michael J. Nader, SBN 200425

mnader@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 

Phillip G. Vermont, SBN 132035 

pvermont@randicklaw.com 

Leslie A. Baxter, SBN 148195 

lbaxter@randicklaw.com 

Patrick E. Guevara, SBN 202727 

pguevara@randicklaw.com 

RANDICK O’DEA & TOOLIATOS, LLP 

5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 400 

Pleasanton, California 94588 

Telephone: (925) 460-3700 

Facsimile: (925) 460-0969 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs IPCENTRICS CORPORATION, 

TELECENTRICS LLC, and TIERONE MARKETING 

CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IPCENTRICS CORPORATION, 

TELECENTRICS LLC, and TIERONE 

MARKETING CORPORATION 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

JORDAN NELSON PEARCE, DEREK 

SCOTT DOMENY, CENTELESIS LLC, 

ITEL MARKETING CORP., and 

AMERICAN REFERRAL NETWORK 

INC., 

Defendants. 

 Case No.: C09-06106 CRB ADR 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING FURTHER CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Conference Date: January 7, 2011 

Time: 8:30 AM 

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

Courtroom: 8, 19th Floor 

Case 3:09-cv-06106-CRB Document 66 Filed 01/04/11 Page 1 of 3
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

CASE NO: C09-06106 CRB ADR 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

The Court referred this matter to mediation through the Court’s ADR Program on April 

16, 2010. On October 14, 2010, the parties attended the mediation with Stewart H. Foreman, 

Esq. While the remaining parties were not able to conclude a settlement at this mediation, they 

continued to negotiate terms for a permanent injunction. Prior to the Christmas holiday, the 

parties continued to negotiate injunctive relief terms and were invited by Mr. Foreman to return 

for a follow up mediation. The parties desire to continue the upcoming case management 

conference (and defer the discovery schedule and possible discovery-related motions) to allow 

them additional time after the holidays to conclude their current negotiations and, if necessary, 

return to Mr. Foreman for a second mediation session. 

Accordingly, it is hereby stipulated by and among the parties that the further case 

management conference scheduled for January 7, 2011 shall be continued and shall take place in 

this Court no less than 60 days on _________________, 2011 at 8:30 a.m., unless otherwise 

ordered by this Court. 

SO STIPULATED 

Dated: December 30, 2010 RANDICK O’DEA & TOOLIATOS, LLP 

 /s/ 

By: ____________________________ 

 Patrick E. Guevara 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Dated: December 30, 2010 MORRISON FOERSTER LLP 

 /s/ 

By: ____________________________ 

 Darryl P. Rains 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 March 18

Case 3:09-cv-06106-CRB Document 66 Filed 01/04/11 Page 2 of 3
3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

CASE NO: C09-06106 CRB ADR 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, 

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: __________________________ By: ___________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

January 3, 2011

Case 3:09-cv-06106-CRB Document 66 Filed 01/04/11 Page 3 of 3