Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05553/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05553-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint 

Case No. cv-09-5533 CRB

MARGARET A. KEANE (State Bar No. 255378) 

mkeane@dl.com 

DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP 

1950 University Avenue 

Suite 500 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Telephone: (650) 845-7000 

Facsimile: (650) 845-7333 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ACCRETIVE, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

KENYA BODDIE AND RAMONDA CARLOS,

Individually situated and on behalf of others 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

AXIANT, LLC; ACCRETIVE, LLC; 

MANN BRACKEN, and 

DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CV-09 5553 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT ACCRETIVE, LLC TO 

RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 

WHEREAS, this action was initially filed on November 23, 2009; 

WHEREAS, a summons was issued as to Defendant Axiant, LLC on November 23, 

2009; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the First Amended Complaint on December 7, 2009 to 

include additional defendants, Accretive, LLC (“Accretive”) and Mann Bracken, LLP; 

WHEREAS, a First Amended Complaint Summons (“Amended Summons”) was issued 

on December 8, 2009; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the Amended Summons and First Amended Complaint on 

Accretive on December 8, 2009. Accordingly, absent an extension of time, Federal Rule of Civil 

Case 3:09-cv-05553-CRB Document 14 Filed 01/06/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint 

Case No. cv-09-5553 CRB

Procedure 12(a)(1)(A) would require Accretive to answer, move or otherwise respond to the First 

Amended Complaint on or before December 28, 2009; and 

WHEREAS, Accretive has requested an initial extension of time within which to move 

against, answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint, and Plaintiffs’ counsel 

has agreed to that request. 

NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned parties through their respective counsel stipulate 

and respectfully request on behalf of Accretive that the Court order as follows: 

1. The undersigned attorney hereby accepts service of the First Amended Complaint 

on behalf of Accretive.

2. The time for Accretive to move against, answer or otherwise respond to the First 

Amended Complaint shall be extended to and including Monday, January 25, 2010. This is the 

first extension of Accretive’s time to move against, answer or otherwise respond to the First 

Amended Complaint in this action.

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, including by signature transmitted by 

facsimile. 

Dated: December 23, 2009 Respectfully submitted, 

DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP 

By: /s/ Margaret A. Keane 

 Margaret A. Keane 

 Attorneys for Defendant Accretive, LLC 

Dated: December 23, 2009 HERRON & HERRON 

By: /s/ J. Wynne Herron 

 J. Wynne Herron 

 Laura Herron Weber 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 

Case 3:09-cv-05553-CRB Document 14 Filed 01/06/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint 

Case No. cv-09-5553 CRB

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:_________________, 2009 

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

PA150502.1 

Jan. 5, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-05553-CRB Document 14 Filed 01/06/10 Page 3 of 3