Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02292/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02292-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN M PERRY, SANDRA B STIER,

PAUL T KATAMI and JEFFREY J

ZARRILLO,

Plaintiffs,

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his

official capacity as governor of

California; EDMUND G BROWN JR, in

his official capacity as attorney

general of California; MARK B

HORTON, in his official capacity

as director of the California

Department of Public Health and

state registrar of vital

statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her

official capacity as deputy

director of health information &

strategic planning for the

California Department of Public

Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his

official capacity as clerkrecorder of the County of

Alameda; and DEAN C LOGAN, in his

official capacity as registrarrecorder/county clerk for the

County of Los Angeles, 

Defendants,

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J

KNIGHT, MARTIN F GUTIERREZ,

HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A

JANSSON and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM –

YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF

CALIOFORNIA RENEWAL, as official

proponents of Proposition 8,

Defendant-Intervenors. /

No C 09-2292 VRW

ORDER

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 338 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

I

Plaintiffs seek leave to file a motion to compel the

deposition of Doug Swardstrom, a member of ProtectMarriage.com – 

Yes on 8 ad hoc executive committee. Doc #333. Swardstrom’s

identity as an executive committee member has only recently been

disclosed to plaintiffs. Id. The court GRANTS leave to file the

motion. 

To resolve the matter promptly, plaintiffs shall file

their motion not later than 7 PM PST on January 4, 2010. 

Proponents shall file their opposition not later than 5 PM PST on

January 5, 2010. The court will hear the matter at the hearing

previously scheduled for January 6, 2010 at 10 AM.

II

The court also wishes to hear the motion to intervene by

Imperial County, Doc #311, at the January 6 hearing. It would be

helpful to have Imperial County’s reply memorandum before the

January 6 hearing. Accordingly, Imperial County shall serve and

file its reply memorandum, if any, not later than January 5, 2010

at 5 PM.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 338 Filed 01/04/10 Page 2 of 2