Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03758/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03758-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1402 Medical Malpractice

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Hon. James B. Peake should be substituted for his predecessor, Acting Secretary Gordon 1

Mansfield, as defendant in this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 25(d)(1).

Case No. C 07-3758-SC

Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants to Answer Plaintiffs’ Complaint 1

JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ

Acting Assistant Attorney General

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

Interim United States Attorney

RICHARD LEPLEY

Assistant Branch Director

DANIEL BENSING D.C. Bar No. 334268

STEVEN Y. BRESSLER D.C. Bar No. 482492

KYLE R. FREENY California Bar No. 247857

Attorneys

United States Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

 P.O. Box 883

 Washington, D.C. 20044

 Telephone: (202) 514-5108

 Facsimile: (202) 616-8460

 Email: Kyle.Freeny@USDOJ.gov

Attorneys for Defendants Hon. James B. Peake, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Hon. 1

James P. Terry, Hon. Daniel L. Cooper, Hon. Bradley G. Mayes, Hon. Michael J. Kussman,

Ulrike Willimon, the United States of America, Hon. Michael B. Mukasey, and Hon. William P.

Greene, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO

VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE and

VETERANS UNITED FOR TRUTH,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

Hon. JAMES B. PEAKE, Secretary of

Veterans Affairs, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

No. C 07-3758-SC

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME 

FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER

PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT

[Civil Local Rule 6-1(a)]

Case 3:07-cv-03758-SC Document 98 Filed 01/24/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. C 07-3758-SC

Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants to Answer Plaintiffs’ Complaint 2

COME NOW THE PARTIES, by and through their undersigned counsel, and HEREBY

STIPULATE AND AGREE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), that defendants’ time to answer

Plaintiffs’ Complaint shall be extended from January 25, 2008, to February 1, 2008. 

Accordingly, Defendants’ Answer to Plaintiffs’ Complaint shall now be filed and served no later

than February 1, 2008. Entry into this stipulation does not alter any hearing date or other

deadline fixed by Court order.

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

Dated: January 23, 2008 JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ

Acting Assistant Attorney General

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

Interim United States Attorney

RICHARD LEPLEY

Assistant Branch Director

 By: /s/ Kyle R. Freeny 

KYLE R. FREENY

 DANIEL BENSING

STEVEN Y. BRESSLER

Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice

Counsel for Defendants

Dated: January 23, 2008 ARTURO J. GONZALES

HEATHER A. MOSER

BILL D. JANICKI

STACEY SPRENKEL

Morrison & Foerster, LLP

 By: /s/ Gordon P. Erspamer 

GORDON P. ERSPAMER

Counsel for Plaintiffs

I, Kyle R. Freeny, as the electronic filer, attest pursuant to General Order 45, Section X,

that Gordon P. Erspamer, whose name appears above, has concurred in this filing.

Dated: January 23, 2008 /s/ Kyle R. Freeny 

KYLE R. FREENY

Counsel for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-03758-SC Document 98 Filed 01/24/08 Page 2 of 2