Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05781/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-05781-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANITA CARR,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARTHA BRONITSKY,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-05781-WHO 

ORDER RE REQUESTS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 4, 5

Plaintiff has filed two letters seeking clarification as to why this bankruptcy appeal was 

assigned to a judge in San Francisco (when plaintiff lives in Alameda County), and asking for 

permission to be allowed to file documents electronically. Dkt. Nos. 4, 5. 

Under the Court’s Civil Local Rules, a civil action which arises in Alameda County will be 

automatically assigned to either the San Francisco Division or the Oakland Division of this Court. 

Civ. L.R. 3-2(d). There is no procedure by which civil cases arising in Alameda County are 

specifically assigned to a judge in the Oakland Division.

With respect to the request to be allowed to file electronically, plaintiff must file a formal 

motion. A sample motion is attached and available at the following website: 

http://cand.uscourts.gov/ECF/proseregistration

Plaintiff does not need to file this motion with the Court in person. Instead, she can file

this motion by mail, sending it to the San Francisco Courthouse: United States District Court, 450 

Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, CA 94102. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18, 2016

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-05781-WHO Document 6 Filed 02/18/16 Page 1 of 1