Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00738/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00738-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

GEE TEE O, L.L.C. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. C05-0738 HRL

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JULIA M. ADAMS (State Bar No. 230795)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

NICOLE MOSS

and DISABILITY RIGHTS, 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION, 

SERVICES: HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NICOLE MOSS, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TAQUERIA CANCUN; GEE TEE O

L.L.C., a limited liability company, JAMES

HONG KIM, NANCY OK KIM,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-0738 HRL 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANT GEE TEE O, L.L.C. TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs NICOLE MOSS; and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES:HELPING YOU HELP OTHERS through their undersigned counsel,

and defendant GEE TEE O L.L.C., through its undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant GEE TEE O L.L.C., is granted an extension of time to and including

May 15, 2007, to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ complaint.

2. In the event defendant GEE TEE O L.L.C., files a motion in lieu of an answer to

plaintiffs’ complaint, the hearing on such motion shall be set on a date no sooner than 45 days

from the filing of said motion.

*ORDER E-FILED: 5/1/2007*

Case 5:05-cv-00738-HRL Document 49 Filed 05/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

GEE TEE O, L.L.C. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NO. C05-0738 HRL 2

3. Defendant further stipulates that it will comply with any and all due dates dictated

by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Court, and/or any scheduling order

issued by the court prior to the date on which defendant’s responsive pleading is due hereunder.

This Stipulation may be executed in faxed counterparts, all of which together shall

constitute one original document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: April 24, 2007 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: _____/s/_______________________

Julia M. Adams

Attorneys for Plaintiffs NICOLE MOSS; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS

DATED: April 24, 2007 FITZPATRICK, SPINI & SWANSTON

By:______/s/_______________________

Anna DiBenedetto

Attorneys for Defendant GEE TEE O L.L.C.

O R D E R

IT IS SO ORDERED that defendant GEE TEE O L.L.C., has until May 15, 2007, to

answer or respond to plaintiffs’ complaint.

DATED: April _____, 2007 ___________________________________

Hon. Howard R. Lloyd

United States Magistrate Judge

1

May

Case 5:05-cv-00738-HRL Document 49 Filed 05/01/07 Page 2 of 2