Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00983/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00983-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FITNESS ANYWHERE, LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 15-cv-00983-VC 

ORDER NOTIFYING THE 

DEFENDANT UNDER RULE 56(F) AND 

REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFING 

Re: Dkt. Nos. 56, 61 

In the papers that WOSS Enterprises has filed in opposition to the Burlington Insurance 

Company's motion for partial summary judgment, and in support of WOSS Enterprises' own 

motion for summary judgment against Berkley Assurance Company, WOSS Enterprises has not 

provided evidence or argument that would support a conclusion that the plaintiff in the underlying 

case used the allegedly infringing phrases as a slogan. WOSS Enterprises is invited to file a 

supplemental brief on this issue, not to exceed 10 pages, by no later than Monday, December 7, 

2015. In addition, WOSS Enterprises is hereby notified that the Court is not merely inclined to 

grant summary judgment to the Burlington Insurance Company on the current record, but also to 

enter summary judgment sua sponte in favor of Berkley Assurance Company. WOSS Enterprises 

is invited to articulate any argument, in the supplemental brief, why the Court should not do that. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f); Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1176 (9th Cir. 2014). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 4, 2015 

______________________________________ 

 VINCE CHHABRIA 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-00983-VC Document 65 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 1