Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01296/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01296-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANUEL CORDOVA,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. HURTADO, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:22-cv-01296 TLN AC

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 24, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 16.) The time to 

file objections has passed, and Plaintiff did not file any objections.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 

the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 

the magistrate judge’s analysis.

Case 2:22-cv-01296-TLN-AC Document 21 Filed 06/21/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations, filed on May 24, 2024 (ECF No. 16), are 

ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference Claim against Defendants is

DISMISSED without leave to amend; 

3. This action will proceed on Plaintiff’s ADA claim against Defendants; and 

4. This action is referred back to the magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings. 

Date: June 20, 2024

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge

Case 2:22-cv-01296-TLN-AC Document 21 Filed 06/21/24 Page 2 of 2