Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03418/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03418-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Plaintiff did timely provide a chambers copy of its proposed order granting the

above-referenced motion, but did not provide a chambers copy of the motion itself.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ROSS J. MILLER, et al.,

Defendants

 /

No. C-05-3418 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On October 3, 2005, plaintiff electronically filed its Notice of Motion and Motion for a

More Definite Statement and to Dismiss Counterclaims. Plaintiff has violated General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s

Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed

electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked

‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and

‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also Standing Orders

For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.1

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

Case 3:05-cv-03418-MMC Document 27 Filed 10/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the Court’s

Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court

may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 14, 2005 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-03418-MMC Document 27 Filed 10/14/05 Page 2 of 2