Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00031/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00031-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LARRY FRANCIS DURDEN, SR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DIEANN FEINSTEIN, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:16-cv-0031 TLN GGH PS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

By order filed February 8, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight 

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff 

of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff 

has not filed an amended complaint. Plaintiff has instead filed a mostly unintelligible and 

rambling document indicating that he will not be filing an amended complaint. (ECF No. 4 at 3, 

5.) 

 Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the reasons given 

in the February 8, 2016, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed 

with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

Case 2:16-cv-00031-TLN-GGH Document 5 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: March 9, 2016 

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

 

GGH:076/Durden0031.fta 

Case 2:16-cv-00031-TLN-GGH Document 5 Filed 03/10/16 Page 2 of 2