Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00696/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00696-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Joseph E. Rubino,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ACME Building Maintenance, et al.,

Defendants. /

NO. C 08-00696 JW 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; VACATING

CURRENT FINAL PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATES

Presently before the Court is Defendant ACME’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment set

for hearing on February 22, 2010. (Docket Item No. 138.) Although this Motion is noticed in

accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order, (Docket Item No. 130), it is set to close to the March

1, 2010 Final Pretrial Conference and the March 16, 2010 Jury Selection. Upon consideration, the

Court finds good cause to VACATE the Final Pretrial Conference and the Trial Schedule at this

time, until the Court has had a chance to evaluate the merits of Defendant’s second Motion for

Summary Judgment. In addition, the Court’s March 16 trial calendar has been given priority to an

earlier filed case. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:

(1) Defendant’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment is continued from February 22,

2010 to March 29, 2010 at 9 a.m.

(2) The trial set to begin on March 16, 2010 is VACATED.

Case 5:08-cv-00696-JW Document 152 Filed 02/17/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

(3) The Final Pretrial Conference set for March 1, 2010 is also VACATED. The Court

will set a new Pretrial Conference date in its order addressing Defendant’s second

Motion, if necessary. All pretrial deadliness shall be reset in accordance with the

new Pretrial Conference Order.

Dated: February 16, 2010 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:08-cv-00696-JW Document 152 Filed 02/17/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

David Dong-In Sohn david.sohn@ogletreedeakins.com

David Jude Comeaux david.comeaux@odnss.com

Erica Kristen Rocush erica.rocush@ogletreedeakins.com

Paul T. Hammerness paul.hammerness@doj.ca.gov

Joseph E Rubino

2151 Oakland Road, # 36

San Jose, CA 95131

Dated: February 16, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: /s/ JW Chambers 

Elizabeth Garcia

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:08-cv-00696-JW Document 152 Filed 02/17/10 Page 3 of 3