Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01505/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01505-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

12394989.1 28 5:16-cv-01505-BLF

NOT. OF CONT. RESOLUTION DISCUSSION AND STIP. TO CONTINUE BRIEFING ON PLTF'S MOT. FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFT'S MOT. TO DISMISS AND TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE 

ON PLTF'S MOT. FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 

KURT A. FRANKLIN, SBN 172715 

kfranklin@hansonbridgett.com 

425 Market Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 777-3200 

Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SlashSupport, Inc. d/b/a/ CSS Corp 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

SLASHSUPPORT, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, d/b/a CSS Corp,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATARAJAN CHOODAMANI,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 5:16-cv-01505-BLF

NOTICE OF CONTINUED RESOLUTION 

DISCUSSION AND STIPULATION TO 

CONTINUE BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF'S 

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANT'S 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO 

CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE ON 

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

This is to notify the Court that the parties have made recent progress on informally 

resolving their differences related to Plaintiff SlashSupport, Inc.'s request for a permanent 

injunction and are now working on documentation related to a resolution. Moreover, the parties 

wish to focus their efforts on resolution rather than near-term briefing on the pending motions. 

Accordingly, to avoid the cost of potentially unnecessary briefing, the parties stipulate to the 

following: 

(1) The hearing on Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Injunction is moved to 9:00 a.m. 

on Thursday, August 11, 2016, to coincide with the hearing on Defendant's Motion 

to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. 

Case 5:16-cv-01505-BLF Document 32 Filed 05/23/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

12394989.1 28

-2- 5:16-cv-01505-BLF

NOT. OF CONT. RESOLUTION DISCUSSION AND STIP. TO CONTINUE BRIEFING ON PLTF'S MOT. FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFT'S MOT. TO DISMISS AND TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE 

ON PLTF'S MOT. FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

(2) If briefing remains necessary, the deadline for Plaintiff to file an opposition to 

Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is moved 

from Monday, May 23, 2016, to Monday, June 13, 2016.

(3) If briefing remains necessary, the deadline for Defendant to file an opposition to 

Plaintiff's Request for a Preliminary Injunction is moved from Wednesday May 25, 

2016, to Wednesday, June 15, 2016. 

(4) Reply briefs to both above-referenced motions, if any, shall be due with 7 days of 

the oppositions. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: May 20, 2016 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

By: /s/ Kurt A. Franklin

KURT A. FRANKLIN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SlashSupport, Inc. d/b/a/ CSS Corp

DATED: May 20, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID W. ANDERSON

By: /s/ David W. Anderson

DAVID W. ANDERSON

Attorney for Defendant

Natarajan Choodamani

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 20, 2016 

THE HONORABLE BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:16-cv-01505-BLF Document 32 Filed 05/23/16 Page 2 of 2