Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00612/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00612-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GERROLD LOVE, )

) 2:04-cv-00612-GEB-PAN

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 

) ORDER

MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF THE HIGH )

DESERT STATE PRISON, MEDICAL )

DIRECTOR OF THE MULE CREEK STATE )

PRISON, and COUNTY OF SHASTA, )

)

Defendants. )

)

On August 26, 2005, Plaintiff’s counsel filed an unnoticed

request in which he seeks to vacate the Status (Pretrial Scheduling)

Order in this action. Plaintiff’s counsel states one of the parties

will oppose the request. Plaintiff’s counsel indicates that the

request has been filed because “the relationship between Plaintiff and

[Plaintiff’s counsel] has deteriorated to the point at which

[Plaintiff] has discharged [counsel].” (Req. at 1.)

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00612-GEB-PAN Document 43 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

This conclusory argument is insufficient to show that good

cause justifies changing the Scheduling Order. Therefore, the request

is denied. 

Dated: August 29, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00612-GEB-PAN Document 43 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 2