Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-05785/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-05785-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Re/Max International, Inc.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

Somraj Singh,

Defendant. /

NO. C 08-05785 JW

PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER -

(BENCH TRIAL)

On February 8, 2010, the Court conducted a Preliminary Pretrial Conference. Counsel for

Plaintiff was present; Defendant appeared pro se. In light of the discussion at the conference, the

Court orders as follows:

(1) The Court orders Defendant to appear for his deposition as scheduled, which the

parties represented to be February 8-9, 2010.

(2) The parties are referred to Magistrate Judge Lloyd (1) to resolve any further

discovery disputes, and (2) for the purpose of discussing a potential settlement of this

case. On or before February 12, 2010, the parties shall contact Judge Lloyd to

schedule a settlement conference. 

(3) Discovery is closed. Thus, to the extent Defendant seeks further discovery, he must

file a properly noticed Motion before this Court to that effect.

Case 5:08-cv-05785-JW Document 61 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 9
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

(4) A dispute arose between the parties at the conference as to whether Defendant has a

right to have a jury hear this case. Upon review of the applicable law, the Court finds

that Defendant has no right to a jury trial where the claims are for de novo review of

an administrative decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board pursuant to 15

U.S.C. § 1071(b). See Material Supply Int'l, Inc. v. Sunmatch Indus. Co., Ltd., No.

CIV. A. 94-1184 (RMU), 1997 WL 243223, at *2 n.6 (D.D.C. May 7, 1997); Har-Bur

Assocs. v. Docktor Pet Ctr., Inc., 678 F. Supp. 98, 99-100 (E.D. Pa. 1986). This

follows from the fact that the Seventh Amendment right to a jury exists for the

purpose of preserving jury trials as provided by common law, rather than statutory or

administrative proceedings. See Atlas Roofing Co., Inc. v. Occupational Safety and

Health Review Comm’n, 430 U.S. 442, 459-60 (1977); Dalicandro v. Legalgard, Inc.,

No. CIV. A. 99-3778, 2001 WL 1428359, at *2 n.3 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2001) 

Accordingly, the Court finds that Defendant does not have a right to a jury

trial. To the extent that Defendant nevertheless believes that he is entitled to a trial

by jury, he may file a properly noticed Motion stating a good faith legal basis for

such relief.

TRIAL SCHEDULE

Final Pretrial Conference (¶4 ) April 26, 2010 at 11 a.m.

Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement and 

In Limine Motions Due 

(.30 days before Final Pretrial Conference)

Once the in limine binders are lodged with the Court

(¶3(b)), the Court will determine whether a hearing is

necessary for the motions in advance of the Final

Pretrial Conference and set the hearing accordingly.

April 16, 2010

Case 5:08-cv-05785-JW Document 61 Filed 02/10/10 Page 2 of 9
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 At the Final Pretrial Conference, the Court reserves the right to fold the afternoon

sessions into morning sessions (9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.) thus creating full days for trial. The final

trial schedule will be confirmed at the Final Pretrial Conference. 

3

Bench Trial Date and Sessions1

Sessions 1-4

Sessions 5-7

Argue & Submit

May 4-7, 2010, 1 p.m. - 4 p.m.

May 11-13, 2010, 1 p.m. - 4 p.m.

May 14, 2010 at 1 p.m.

Meet and Confer Requirement

1. No later than 30 days prior to the Final Pretrial Conference, the parties shall meet and

confer with respect to the Joint Pretrial Conference Statement, submission of a joint list of witnesses,

a joint list of trial exhibits and a joint list of discovery material which each party intends to offer in

evidence as a part of its case-in-chief. Unless objections are made in accord with this Order, all

witnesses, exhibits and discovery material contained on the joint submission shall be deemed

admissible into evidence by stipulation.

Objections and Lodging Disputed Material with the Court

2. If a party objects to receipt into evidence of a witness, exhibits or discovery response,

the party shall advise all opposing parties during the conference described in paragraph 1, and

attempt to resolve the dispute. If the parties are unsuccessful in resolving the dispute, any party

wishing to object to receipt of the testimony of any witness, any exhibit or discovery response into

evidence shall lodge with Chambers a copy of the disputed material at the commencement of trial. 

Attached to the submission shall be a brief statement of the objection and any response by the

proffering party. The Court will indicate on the submitted copy whether the objection is overruled

or sustained and return the material to counsel.

Lodging Joint Pretrial Conference Statement and in Limine Motions

3. Pursuant to the date set forth in the Case Schedule, the parties shall file and lodge

with Chambers the following:

Case 5:08-cv-05785-JW Document 61 Filed 02/10/10 Page 3 of 9
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 4

a. Joint Pretrial Conference Statement: The parties shall file a joint pretrial

statement which shall contain the following information: (1) a brief description of

the substance of claims and defenses which remain to be decided; (2) a detailed

statement of all the relief claimed, particularly itemizing all elements of damages

claimed as well as witnesses, documents or other evidentiary material to be presented

concerning the amount of those damages; (3) a plain and concise statement of all

relevant facts not reasonably disputable, as well as which facts the parties will

stipulate for incorporation into the trial record without the necessity of supporting

testimony or exhibits; (4) a plain and concise statement of all disputed factual issues

which remain to be decided; (5) a statement assessing whether all or part of the action

may be presented upon an agreed statement of facts; (6) a statement of stipulations

requested or proposed for pretrial or trial purposes; (7) without extended legal

argument, a concise statement of each disputed point of law concerning liability or

relief, citing supporting statutes and decisions; (8) a list of all witnesses likely to be

called at trial; (9) a list of evidence the parties intend to present at trial through use of

excerpts from depositions, from interrogatory answers, or from responses to requests

for admission; and (10) any other subjects relevant to the trial of the action, or

material to its just, speedy and inexpensive determination. Counsel are directed to

meet and confer in advance of the date for submission of pretrial material with

respect to the pretrial conference statement.

b. In Limine Motions: Any in limine motions shall be filed in writing and

submitted along with the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement. Any opposition

shall be filed in writing and served no later than ten (10) days after the opening briefs

have been filed and served. Fifteen (15) days before the date of the Final Pretrial

Conference, the parties shall organize their in limine motions as follows:

(1) Each side shall be responsible for producing a combined folder with all of

their in limine motions, oppositions to their motions (if any), and replies (if

any), respectively. The motion papers shall be clearly marked and separated

Case 5:08-cv-05785-JW Document 61 Filed 02/10/10 Page 4 of 9
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 5

in one single binder. The binder shall contain a table of contents, listing each

motion with a short sentence regarding the grounds for in limine and a short

sentence regarding the opposition; all statements must be supported by proper

citations to the motions. The table of contents shall also be saved on a 31⁄2

floppy disk or a CD in MS Word or WordPerfect format to be attached

inside the binder. 

(2) Please note that this binder is not a substitute for filing the motions and

related papers via ECF; it is designed for the Court to evaluate the motions.

Two copies of the binder shall be delivered to the Court (by way of the

Clerk’s Office) no later than fifteen (15) days before the date of the Final

Pretrial Conference by 4 PM. The parties must also bring the binder to the

Final Pretrial Conference for their own references.

(3) These motions will be deemed submitted without oral argument, unless the

Court orders otherwise.

Final Pretrial Conference

4. The Court will conduct a Final Pretrial Conference on the date set forth in the Case

Schedule. The trial attorneys must attend the conference. At the final pretrial conference the Court

will consider issues raised in the Final Pretrial Conference Statement, motions in limine and discuss

the procedures for trial of the case.

Lodging Witness Lists, Exhibit Lists

5. At the Final Pretrial Conference, the parties shall lodge with Chambers the joint list

of witnesses, and a joint list of exhibits. Unless otherwise ordered, all exhibits shall be in a format

compatible with either the video or digital evidence presentation system utilized by the Court. The

proffering party shall retain custody of all exhibits, schedules, summaries, diagrams or charts to be

used at the trial. 

6. Upon request, in noncomplex cases the court will excuse the parties from using

electronic formatted documents. In that event on the first day of trial, the parties shall submit

exhibits as follows:

a. A copy for the trial judge;

b. A copy for the witness stand. 

c. No duplicates of a document shall be submitted, unless the duplicate copy has

independent evidentiary value to prove some disputed issue of material fact

Case 5:08-cv-05785-JW Document 61 Filed 02/10/10 Page 5 of 9
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 6

(e.g., date stamp to prove receipt on a particular date, where date of receipt is

a disputed issue of a material fact). 

Proposed Findings (Nonjury Trials)

7. In nonjury trials, on the first day of trial, each party shall submit its proposed

findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Bench Trial Schedule

8. The time allowed for trial shall be divided equally between the plaintiff’s side and the

defendant’s side. Co-parties are ordered to meet, confer and agree to an allocation among

themselves. A party may spend its allocated time presenting its own case or on cross-examination of

witnesses called by other parties or for presentation of a counterclaim. When a party's allocated time

period has expired, unless otherwise ordered for good cause shown, no further time will be allowed

to that party if it would interfere with the ability of the opposing party to present its case.

Trial Procedure

9. In opening statements, counsel shall not express personal knowledge or opinion

concerning any matter in issue.

10. Counsel must question witnesses from the podium, using the microphone. Without

requesting permission, counsel may approach witnesses for any proper purposes.

11. Address all remarks to the Court, not to opposing counsel.

12. Refer to all persons, including witnesses, other counsel and the parties by their

surnames and not by their first or given names.

13. In examining a witness, counsel shall not repeat or echo the answer given by the

witness.

14. Counsel must stand when making an objection. 

15. Conferences at the bench or sidebar are not favored by the Court. Any sidebar

conferences which are allowed will be off the record. If any counsel wishes to place matters on the

record, he or she may so request, and the Court will make a responsive order.

Case 5:08-cv-05785-JW Document 61 Filed 02/10/10 Page 6 of 9
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 7

16. Counsel have full responsibility to arrange for the appearance of witnesses during

the presentation of their case so as to eliminate delay caused by waiting for witnesses who have been

placed on call by counsel.

17. Unless an agreement to the contrary is entered into by opposing counsel, all

nonparty or nonexpert witnesses will be excluded from the courtroom when not testifying. When a

witness has completed his or her testimony, the witness is excused unless counsel indicates that he

or she wishes the witness to remain subject to being recalled. Any witness who has been excused

from further testimony may remain as a spectator. It will be the responsibility of counsel to make an

announcement at the time the witness steps down that he or she should remain in the environs of the

Court for a reasonable time to permit such counsel an opportunity to secure and serve a subpoena

upon the witness and assume responsibility for his or her per diem and other expenses as provided

by governing rule or statute.

18. Counsel shall admonish all persons at counsel table that gestures, facial expressions,

audible comments, or the like, as manifestations of approval or disapproval during the testimony of

witnesses, or at any other time, are prohibited.

19. Witness examination shall consist of direct examination, cross-examination and redirect examination. No recross-examination will be allowed without prior approval of the Court

specifically indicating the area for recross-examination. When there are multiple defense counsel,

they are directed to confer and designate to the Court the sequence in which they wish to be

recognized during trial for purposes of presenting opening statements and conducting crossexamination of witnesses. If one counsel conducts the direct examination of a witness, that same

counsel must make objections when the witness is cross-examined. Counsel who will conduct the

cross-examination should object while the witness is on direct.

20. After the commencement of trial testimony, upon request of co-parties, any

objection, motion or other application for relief made by any co-party, orally or in writing, shall be

deemed to be adopted and joined in by every other co-party, without announcement by counsel to

that effect, and the rulings of the Court shall be deemed applicable to each party unless otherwise

Case 5:08-cv-05785-JW Document 61 Filed 02/10/10 Page 7 of 9
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 8

stated at the time the ruling is made. Accordingly, it shall be regarded as unnecessary and improper

for counsel to rise to "join in" an objection or motion. Rather, counsel should rise to be heard only

for the purpose of expressly opting out of an objection or motion if that is his or her position.

21. Counsel are directed to deliver to opposing counsel at the end of each trial day (if

not earlier) a list of witnesses counsel anticipates calling the next trial day.

22. Counsel calling a non-client witness to testify should have no further discussions

with that witness concerning the case or any aspect of his or her testimony after the witness has been

tendered for cross-examination and until such time as the witness has been tendered back for redirect

examination. At all other times, within the bounds of governing ethics and the law, counsel may

engage in discussions with witnesses during trial.

23. Any time taken away from presentation of evidence to the trier of fact due to, for

example, lengthy legal motions made during the time allocated to the presentation of evidence, or

delays in the commencement of proceedings due to circumstances within the control of counsel, will

be deducted from the time allocated for the presentation of evidence. Upon timely application based

upon good cause, the Court may relieve a party of its stipulation to the agreed schedule.

24. It is the practice of the Court periodically to inform counsel of the Court's record of

how much time each side has remaining for the presentation of evidence based upon the stipulated

trial schedule.

Daily Trial Transcript

25. Any counsel desiring daily or expedited transcripts during trial should make

immediate arrangements with the court reporter and should inform the Court and other counsel of

such intentions.

Dated: February 8, 2010 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:08-cv-05785-JW Document 61 Filed 02/10/10 Page 8 of 9
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 9

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

E. Patrick Ellisen ellisenp@gtlaw.com

Srecko Vidmar vidmarl@gtlaw.com

Somraj Singh

4661 Alhambra Dr.

Fremont, CA 94536

Dated: February 8, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: /s/ JW Chambers 

Elizabeth Garcia

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:08-cv-05785-JW Document 61 Filed 02/10/10 Page 9 of 9