Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-03061/USCOURTS-caed-2_18-cv-03061-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18:1836(a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE and ORDER

GREGORY P. STONE (State Bar No. 78329)

gregory.stone@mto.com

JEREMY K. BEECHER (State Bar No. 301272)

Jeremy.beecher@mto.com

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

350 South Grand Avenue, Fiftieth Floor

Los Angeles, California 90071-3426

Telephone: (213) 683-9100

Facsimile: (213) 687-3702

CAROLYN HOECKER LUEDTKE (State Bar No. 207976)

carolyn.luedtke@mto.com

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 512-4000

Facsimile: (415) 512-4077

Attorneys for Plaintiff Intel Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

INTEL CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DOYLE RIVERS, an individual, and DOES 1 

through 10, inclusive,,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:18-cv-03061-MCE-AC

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND ORDER 

DISMISSING CASE

The parties have resolved their dispute and jointly stipulate to the entry of an order 

dismissing this action with prejudice. The parties agree that each will bear its own attorneys’ 

fees and expenses. As part of the settlement, Defendant Doyle Rivers has provided a 

certification that he is currently not in possession of Intel confidential information, that he 

has not used or disclosed Intel confidential information, and that he will not in the future use 

or disclose Intel confidential information. The parties have agreed that if it is later 

Case 2:18-cv-03061-MCE-AC Document 92 Filed 01/10/20 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

discovered that this certification is untrue, or if he violates it in the future, that this Court 

shall retain jurisdiction over that dispute and the agreed upon remedies provided for in the 

Settlement Agreement. The parties therefore request that this Court retain jurisdiction to 

enforce the Settlement Agreement between the parties.

DATED: January 7, 2020

By: /s/ James Kachmar By: /s/ Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke

JAMES KACHMAR

WEINTRAUB TOBIN

Attorney for Defendant Doyle Rivers

CAROLYN HOECKER LUEDTKE

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

Attorneys for Intel Corporation

ECF ATTENTATION

I, Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke, am the ECF user whose account is being used to file this 

document. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(2), I attest that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from all signatories.

Case 2:18-cv-03061-MCE-AC Document 92 Filed 01/10/20 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the Court dismisses this action with prejudice. 

Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and expenses. Pursuant to the settlement 

agreement, Defendant Doyle Rivers has provided a certification and the parties have 

agreed that if he violates the certification, they will file a stipulated joint motion with this 

Court to enter an agreed upon permanent injunction. As such, this Court will retain 

jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement between the parties as well as impose the 

agreed upon remedies for any violations of the confidentiality certification provided for in 

the Settlement Agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 10, 2020

Case 2:18-cv-03061-MCE-AC Document 92 Filed 01/10/20 Page 3 of 3