Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00298/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00298-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 “Under sentence four” of § 405(g) of the Act, “a district court may remand in

conjunction with a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the [Commissioner’s]

decision.” Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 99–100 (1991) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)).

WO

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Guadalupe C. Trevino, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social

Security, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-10-298-PHX-GMS

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Remand (Doc. 15)

pursuant to sentence four of Section 405(g) of the Social Security Act.1

 For good cause

showing, 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Remand

(Doc. 15) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to remand this matter

to the Social Security Administration.

Upon remand, the Appeals Council shall instruct the administrative law judge to

redetermine the severity of Plaintiff’s impairments at step two of the five-step sequential

Case 2:10-cv-00298-GMS Document 16 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

evaluation process, proceed through the remaining steps of the sequential evaluation, and

properly evaluate all opinion evidence of record, providing specific reasons supported by the

record for the weight assigned to each opinion.

DATED this 21st day of July, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-00298-GMS Document 16 Filed 07/21/10 Page 2 of 2