Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02087/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02087-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY A CARRICO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-02087-DMR 

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE

Plaintiffs filed a motion for court-directed service of complaint and summons on counsel 

for Defendant Yoonwha Park [Docket No. 41] on March 30, 2016. Defendant Yoonwha Park has 

not yet made an appearance in this case. Defendant Park is an employee of Defendant Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”). Plaintiffs state that Defendant SEC declined to accept service on 

behalf of Defendant Yoonwha Park. Mot. at 4. In the parties’ joint case management statement 

[Docket No. 35], Defendant SEC appeared to object to Plaintiffs’ request for court-directed 

service of the complaint and summons on counsel for Defendant Park. Id. at 3. Defendant SEC,

however, has filed no opposition or statement of nonopposition to Plaintiffs’ motion. Pursuant to 

Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), any brief in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion was due on April 13, 2016, 

but no such opposition has been received. 

The court hereby orders that Defendant SEC file a statement indicating whether it opposes

Plaintiffs’ motion for court-directed service of the complaint and summons on counsel for 

Defendant Yoonwha Park or to alternatively file a statement of nonopposition consistent with 

Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). Defendant SEC is ordered to file such a response by April 25, 2016. 

This order to show cause does not constitute permission to file a late opposition. 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(c), Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a reply is April 20, 2016. If 

Plaintiffs wish to file a response, limited to issues raised in Defendant SEC’s statement, they may 

Case 4:15-cv-02087-DMR Document 50 Filed 04/20/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

do so by April 28, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2016

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:15-cv-02087-DMR Document 50 Filed 04/20/16 Page 2 of 2