Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01923/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-01923-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT BANUELOS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GLADYS SANDOVAL, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 1:14-cv-01923-MCE-SAB

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS 

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 

(ECF Nos. 5, 8, 9) 

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 

 Plaintiff proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis filed this civil rights action pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 4, 2014. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

 On December 31, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations 

which was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and 

Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. On January 20, 2015, Plaintiff filed an 

Objection. 

 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 

a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

/// 

/// 

Case 1:14-cv-01923-MCE-SAB Document 10 Filed 02/04/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 31, 2014 (ECF No. 8), are 

ADOPTED in full; 

 2. Defendants Kings County Board of Supervisors are DISMISSED from this action 

for Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim against them; 

 3. Plaintiff’s equal protection, due process, right to petition, 28 U.S.C. § 1981, and 

IDEA claims are DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state a claim; 

 4. Plaintiff’s claim under California Welfare and Institutions Code section 16010.6 

is DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state a claim; 

 5. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the retaliation claim based upon Defendant 

Sandoval’s refusal to allow Plaintiff to bring Stefan gifts and access the recreation 

yard; 

 6. The retaliation claims in regard to all other allegations are DISMISSED with 

prejudice; 

 7. Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file an 

amended complaint regarding only his retaliation claim against Defendant 

Sandoval based upon the refusal to allow Plaintiff to bring Stefan gifts and access 

the recreation yard; and 

 8. Failure to file a complaint in compliance with this order will result in this action 

being dismissed for failure to state a claim. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 3, 2015 

Case 1:14-cv-01923-MCE-SAB Document 10 Filed 02/04/15 Page 2 of 2