Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01273/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01273-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

McGREGOR W. SCOTT 

United States Attorney 

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL 

Regional Chief Counsel 

DANIEL P. TALBERT 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Social Security Administration 

 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 

 San Francisco, CA 94105 

 Telephone: (415) 977-8995 

 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

SHERRY JONES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ANDREW SAUL, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:19-cv-01273-AC 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

FOR A THIRTY-DAY EXTENSION FOR 

DEFENDANT TO FILE HIS CROSS-MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

The parties stipulate by counsel that Defendant shall have a further thirty days to file his 

cross-motion for summary judgment. Defendant’s motion is due March 20, 2020; the parties 

stipulate to an extension through April 20, 2020. Good cause exists for this extension because 

this case involves an application after March 27, 2017, meaning that the agency’s new medical 

evidence regulations apply to this case. Because these regulations represent a significant change 

in Social Security disability law, counsel for Defendant requires more time to consult with other 

attorneys in the agency as well as more time for sufficient review of his cross-motion before 

filing it. To the best of counsel for Defendant’s knowledge, this is likely the first case to be 

briefed in this Court in which the new medical evidence regulations are an issue. The requested 

Case 2:19-cv-01273-AC Document 17 Filed 03/19/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

extension will give Defendant sufficient time to research and brief this novel issue and to present 

it fully and accurately to the Court. 

Respectfully submitted March 18, 2020. 

DATED: March 18, 2020 /s/ Barbara Rizzo

 BARBARA RIZZO 

 (as authorized by email) 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 McGREGOR W. SCOTT 

 United States Attorney 

DATED: March 18, 2020 By s/ Daniel P. Talbert 

 DANIEL P. TALBERT 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

ORDER 

 Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered. 

DATE: March 18, 2020 

Case 2:19-cv-01273-AC Document 17 Filed 03/19/20 Page 2 of 2