Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06699/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06699-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CASE NO. C 06-06699-RMW 

KEVIN P. MUCK (CSB No. 120918) 

SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB No. 126930) 

KALAMA M. LUI-KWAN (CSB No. 242121) 

GUINEVERE L. JOBSON (CSB No. 251907) 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

Email: kmuck@fenwick.com

 smuck@fenwick.com

 klui-kwan@fenwick.com

 gjobson@fenwick.com

Attorneys for Defendants Jack Browne, John E. Bourgoin, 

Kenneth L. Coleman, Sandy Creighton, Kevin C. Eichler, 

Fred M. Gibbons, Robert R. Herb, Anthony B. Holbrook, 

Brad Holtzinger, Benjamin A. Horowitz, Mervin S. Kato, 

William M. Kelly, Brian Knowles, Lavi Lev, Derek Meyer, 

Kate Hunt Rundle, Mark Tyndall, and G. Michael Uhler, and 

Nominal Defendant MIPS Technologies, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re MIPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

DERIVATIVE LITIGATION 

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS 

No. C 06-06699-RMW 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 

Case 5:06-cv-06699-RMW Document 53 Filed 03/05/2008 Page 1 of 3

*E-FILED - 3/13/08*

Case 5:06-cv-06699-RMW Document 54 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 1 CASE NO. C 06-06699-RMW 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their 

respective counsel of record, as follows: 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the orders entered by the Court on April 12, 2007 

(“Consolidation Order”) and August 20, 2007 (“Scheduling Order”), Lead Plaintiff Joseph Carco 

filed a Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint (“Consolidated Complaint”) on August 

30, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Nominal Defendant MIPS Technologies, Inc. (“MIPS”) filed a motion to 

dismiss the Consolidated Complaint on the grounds that Lead Plaintiff lacks standing to assert 

derivative claims and, pursuant to the Consolidation Order, the individual defendants had no 

obligation to respond to the Consolidated Complaint pending resolution of that motion; 

WHEREAS, on January 11, 2008, the Court entered an order granting MIPS’ motion to 

dismiss with leave to amend; 

WHEREAS, on February 20, 2008, Lead Plaintiff Carco and plaintiff Timmy Rollins 

(“Plaintiffs”) filed a First Amended Consolidated Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint 

(“FAC”); 

WHEREAS, MIPS’ response to the FAC is due on March 28, 2008, and it intends to 

move to dismiss the FAC on the ground that Plaintiffs lack standing to sue on MIPS’ behalf; and 

WHEREAS, the parties believe that the resources of the Court and the parties are best 

conserved, and the interests of judicial economy are best served, by deferring the filing of 

responses to the FAC, and any subsequent amended pleadings, until after the Court has resolved 

the issue of whether Plaintiffs lack standing to sue on behalf of MIPS; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Northern District of 

California Civil Local Rule 6-1, by and between the undersigned counsel, as follows: 

1. MIPS’ motion to dismiss, to be filed on or before March 28, 2008, shall be limited 

to the issue of whether Plaintiffs have established their standing to sue on MIPS’ behalf. 

2. Other than as set forth above in Section 1, neither MIPS nor any of the individual 

defendants in this action shall have any obligation to respond to or move to dismiss the FAC, or 

any subsequent amended pleadings, until and unless the Court determines that Plaintiffs have 

Case 5:06-cv-06699-RMW Document 54 Filed 03/13/08 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER 2 CASE NO. C 06-06699-RMW 

standing to sue on behalf of MIPS. At such time, if any, the parties shall meet and confer 

regarding a schedule for any necessary responses to or motions to dismiss the complaint. 

Dated: March 5, 2008 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By /s/ Kevin P. Muck 

Kevin P. Muck 

Attorneys for Defendants Jack Browne, John E. 

Bourgoin, Kenneth L. Coleman, Sandy Creighton, 

Kevin C. Eichler, Fred M. Gibbons, Robert R. Herb, 

Anthony B. Holbrook, Brad Holtzinger, Benjamin A. 

Horowitz, Mervin S. Kato, William M. Kelly, Brian 

Knowles, Lavi Lev, Derek Meyer, Kate Hunt Rundle, 

Mark Tyndall, and G. Michael Uhler, and Nominal 

Defendant MIPS Technologies, Inc. 

Dated: March 5, 2008 BERGESON, LLP 

By /s/ Caroline McIntyre 

Caroline McIntyre 

Attorneys for Defendant Renata Creager Lane 

Dated: March 5, 2008 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & 

ROBBINS LLP 

By /s/ John K. Grant 

John K. Grant 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest 

under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from 

Caroline McIntyre and John K. Grant. 

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________________ ____________________________________ 

THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

22622/00403/LIT/1281313.2 

3/13/08

Case 5:06-cv-06699-RMW Document 54 Filed 03/13/08 Page 3 of 3