Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01870/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01870-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Silvino Garcia-Perez, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Katrina S. Kane, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-13-01870-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

 Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on September 10, 2013 

raising two grounds for relief: 1) that he has suffered prolonged detention and is entitled to 

a bond redetermination hearing; and 2) that his convictions do not make him a danger to 

the community. Respondents filed their Response to Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of 

Habeas Corpus on December 12, 2013. No reply was filed. On June 17, 2014, the 

Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition 

be dismissed. 

 In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation 

within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such 

objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been 

filed. 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. 

Case 2:13-cv-01870-SRB Document 16 Filed 07/08/14 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the order of this Court. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is 

denied. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

 Dated this 8th day of July, 2014. 

 

Case 2:13-cv-01870-SRB Document 16 Filed 07/08/14 Page 2 of 2