Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00619/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00619-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 375
Nature of Suit: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31:3729 False Claims Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER 2

Stephen R. Jaffe SBN 48539

The Jaffe Law Firm

101 California Street, Suite 2710

San Francisco, CA 94111

stephen.r.jaffe@jaffetriallaw.com

415.618.0100

Attorneys for Relator TAMARA EVANS

McDOUGAL, LOVE, BOEHMER, 

FOLEY, LYON, CANLAS

8100 La Mesa Boulevard, Suite 200

La Mesa, CA 91942

(619) 440-4444

Attorneys for Defendant SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL

TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.

TAMARA EVANS,

 Relator,

vs.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 

INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING AND 

DEVELOPMENT CENTER, et al.

 Defendant.

Case No.: 2:15-cv-00619-MCE

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING 

NEW DATE BY WHICH DISPOSITIVE 

MOTIONS MUST BE FILED.

The parties stipulate to the following facts:

1. The present scheduling order (Document 47) requires the parties to file dispositive 

motions no later than 180 days from close of discovery on September 20, 2019, or by 

March 18 , 2020.

2. Stephen R. Jaffe, counsel for the relator in this action, is lead counsel for the relators 

in United States of America ex rel Rose et al. v Stephens Institute et al, N. Dist. CA 

Case No. 09-CIV-5966-PJH ( hereafter “US v AAU”).

Case 2:15-cv-00619-MCE-CKD Document 65 Filed 02/05/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER 2

3. US v. AAU is in its eleventh year of litigation. It has been contentiously litigated in 

the District Court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and was the subject of an 

unsuccessful petition for writ of certiorari by the defendant in the United States 

Supreme Court.

4. US v AAU is set for jury trial on May 5, 2020. However, pretrial documents and 

materials are due to be filed with the District Court commencing March 5, 2020.

5. Under the present scheduling order, it is impossible for Mr. Jaffe to prepare for trial 

in US v AAU and, at the same time, prepare dispositive motions and/or oppose

defendant’s dispositive motion, if any, in this case.

6. No party will be prejudiced by the rescheduling order sought by this stipulation.

7. The parties agree this court may make an Order resetting the last date to file 

dispositive motions in this action from March 18, 2020 to July 15, 2020.

McDOUGAL, LOVE, BOEHMER, THE JAFFE LAW FIRM 

FOLEY, LYON, CANLAS

By:_______/s/_____________ By:_____________/s/_____________________

John Petze Stephen R. Jaffe

Attorneys for Southern California Attorneys for Realtor EVANS

Intergovernmental Training

and Development Center

ORDER

The foregoing stipulation having been presented to the Court and good cause appearing,

the last day for the parties to file dispositive motions herein is continued from March 18, 2020 to

July 15, 2020. All other dates set forth in the operative scheduling order remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2020

Case 2:15-cv-00619-MCE-CKD Document 65 Filed 02/05/20 Page 2 of 2