Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00581/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00581-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMIE LYNN LENEX,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-cv-581-BAM

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE 

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

RESPONSE DUE April 21, 2016

Plaintiff Jamie Lenex seeks review of the Commissioner’s denial of her social security 

benefits. On April 17, 2015, this Court entered a scheduling order in this action. (Doc. 5). 

Pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order, Plaintiff is required to prosecute this action by either 

seeking voluntary remand or filing a dispositive motion within 95 days from the date of service 

of the administrative record by Defendant. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result 

in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and 

orders. See Local Rule 110.

A review of the docket, including the extension of time to submit Plaintiff’s confidential 

letter brief, reveals that the administrative record was filed on September 28, 2015. (Doc. 10).

Based on the Court’s order modifying the scheduling order to allow Plaintiff an additional thirty 

days to submit her letter brief, Plaintiff’s opening brief was therefore due no later than February 

3, 2016. (Doc. 12). To date, Plaintiff has not filed her opening brief.

Case 1:15-cv-00581-BAM Document 15 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why this action should 

not be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s scheduling order and 

Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action. Plaintiff shall file a written response to this order to 

show cause no later than April 21, 2016. Plaintiff is forewarned that failure to respond to this 

order to show cause will result in the dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 6, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00581-BAM Document 15 Filed 04/07/16 Page 2 of 2