Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-03222/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-03222-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE

LITIGATION MDL No. 2804

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO í97)

On December 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 62 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for

the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1407. See 290 F.Supp.3d 1375 (J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, 1,489 additional action(s)

have been transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such

actions have been assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge

Polster.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the

Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of December 5, 2017, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7íday period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

John W. Nichols

Clerk of the Panel

Jun 26, 2019

I hereby certify that this instrument is a true and correct copy of

the original on file in my office. Attest: Sandy Opacich, Clerk

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio

By: /s/Robert Pitts

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:19-cv-03222-LB Document 7 Filed 06/28/19 Page 1 of 3
IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE

LITIGATION MDL No. 2804

SCHEDULE CTOí97 í TAGíALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ARIZONA

AZ 2 19í04410 Yuma, County of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 19í03222 Tule River Indian Tribe of California v.

AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al

CAN 3 19í03224 Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen

Drug Corporation et al

COLORADO

CO 1 19í01701 City of Sheridan v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al

CO 1 19í01704 City of Federal Heights v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al

FLORIDA MIDDLE

FLM 3 19í00699 St. Johns County, Florida v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al

FLM 3 19í00702 Bradford County, Florida v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al

FLM 6 19í01064 Seminole County, Florida v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al

FLM 8 19í01388 Hernando County v. Amerisourcebergen Drug

Corporation et al

KENTUCKY EASTERN

KYE 0 19í00056 Morgan County Fiscal Court v. Amerisourcebergen

Drug Corporation et al

MASSACHUSETTS

MA 1 19í11266 City of New Bedford et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug

Corporation et al

MA 1 19í11277 Town of Ayer, Massachusetts v. Amerisourcebergen

Drug Corporation et al

MA 4 19í40077 Town of Oxford v. Amerisourcebergen Drug

Corporation et al

Case 3:19-cv-03222-LB Document 7 Filed 06/28/19 Page 2 of 3
MIE 2 19í11703 Charter Township of Pittsfield, Michigan v. Purdue

Pharma L.P. et al

MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN

MSS 1 19í00308 City of Wiggins, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen

Drug Corporation et al

MSS 5 19í00053 Franklin County, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen

Drug Corporation et al

PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE

PAM 3 19í00963 Wright Township, Pennsylvania v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.

et al

TEXAS SOUTHERN

TXS 4 19í02089 Fire and Police Retiree Health Care Fund, San Antonio

v. CVS Health Corporation

MICHIGAN EASTERN

Opposed 6/25/19

Case 3:19-cv-03222-LB Document 7 Filed 06/28/19 Page 3 of 3