Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05532/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05532-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Non-Expert Discovery Deadline for Limited Purpose

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RODERICK HERBERT, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1 to 20, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 4:06-CV-05532-SBA 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY 

DEADLINE FOR THE LIMITED 

PURPOSE OF TAKING PLAINTIFF 

RODERICK HERBERT’S DEPOSITION 

ONLY 

All parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to continue the 

deadline to complete non-expert discovery as follows: 

I. 

RECITALS

1. The parties have been working diligently toward moving this case forward in an 

efficient, expeditious manner. The parties have exchanged written discovery and responses and 

plaintiff Roderick Herbert (“Herbert”) has completed his one noticed deposition of the person most 

knowledgeable of defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). 

2. State Farm timely noticed Herbert’s deposition for September 26, 2007. 

3. On September 24, 2007, in the afternoon, Herbert’s counsel, Craig Martin, advised 

that he is unavailable for Herbert’s deposition on September 26, 2007, and that he would not be 

available until October 10, 2007. 

4. The Scheduling Order in this matter currently provides for non-expert discovery to 

Case 4:06-cv-05532-SBA Document 53 Filed 10/19/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Non-Expert Discovery Deadline for Limited Purpose

be completed by October 1, 2007. 

5. For this reason, the parties have agreed to stipulate to revise the Court’s Scheduling 

Order to continue the non-expert discovery cut-off date to October 19, 2007, for the limited purpose 

of taking Herbert’s deposition only. No other non-expert discovery can be conducted after the nonexpert discovery deadline of October 1, 2007. 

6. The parties do not seek to continue any other deadlines as set forth in the Court’s 

previously revised Scheduling Order. 

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to revising the Scheduling Order to continue the 

discovery-cut off, for the limited purpose of taking Herbert’s deposition only, as follows: 

II. 

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to continue the non-expert discovery deadline from October 1, 

2007 to October 19, 2007, for the limited purpose of taking the deposition of plaintiff Roderick 

Herbert only. 

The Court’s previously revised Scheduling Order otherwise remains in effect. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: , 2007 LAW OFFICES OF CRAIG K. MARTIN 

By 

CRAIG K. MARTIN 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

RODERICK HERBERT 

Dated: , 2007 HAYES DAVIS BONINO 

 ELLINGSON McLAY & SCOTT, LLP 

By 

STEPHEN M. HAYES 

CHERIE M. SUTHERLAND 

Attorneys for Defendant 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY 

Case 4:06-cv-05532-SBA Document 53 Filed 10/19/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Non-Expert Discovery Deadline for Limited Purpose

I. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

In accordance with the Stipulation of the parties, the deadline for conducting non-expert 

discovery has been moved to October 19, 2007 for the limited purpose to taking plaintiff Roderick 

Herbert’s deposition only. 

The Court’s previously revised Scheduling Order otherwise remains in effect. 

Dated: 10/17/07 _____________________________________ 

 HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF 

CALIFORNIA 

Case 4:06-cv-05532-SBA Document 53 Filed 10/19/07 Page 3 of 3