Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00362/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00362-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT R. RECINO,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNKNOWN,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00362-LJO-BAM (PC)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE 

TO OBEY COURT ORDER

FOURTEEN (14)-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Robert R. Recino (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On June 14, 2016, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to either file a third 

amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on the cognizable 

claims identified in that order. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff was also expressly warned that the failure 

to comply with that order would result in dismissal of his action, with prejudice, for failure to 

prosecute and failure to obey a court order. (Id. at 12.) 

Plaintiff’s amended complaint or notification to the Court of his willingness to proceed on 

cognizable claims was due on or before July 18, 2016. To date, Plaintiff has not complied with 

that order, nor has he otherwise been in contact with the Court. Plaintiff will be permitted one 

final opportunity to show cause why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice.

Case 1:15-cv-00362-LJO-BAM Document 28 Filed 07/25/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause by WRITTEN 

response within fourteen (14) days of service of this order why this action should not be 

dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the Court’s order and for failure to prosecute. 

Plaintiff is warned that if the response does not show GOOD CAUSE, this matter will be 

dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00362-LJO-BAM Document 28 Filed 07/25/16 Page 2 of 2