Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02786/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02786-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

50968/1921983.1 Case No. C 06-CV-2786

STIPULATION RE: RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

 John M. Potter (Bar No. 165843) 

 johnpotter@quinnemanuel.com 

 Scott G. Lawson (Bar No. 174671) 

 scottlawson@quinnemanuel.com 

 Patrick C. Doolittle (Bar No. 203659) 

 patrickdoolittle@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MICHAEL BYRD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

ANDREW E. ROTH, derivatively on behalf 

of BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS, INC. 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GREGORY L. REYES, MICHAEL BYRD, 

ANTONIO CANOVA, JACK CUTHBERT 

and BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS, INC. 

Defendants. 

 CASE NO. 3:06-CIV-2786 CRB 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

Honorable Charles R. Breyer 

WHEREAS, the complaint is this action was filed on April 24, 2006; 

WHEREAS, defendant Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. ("Brocade") filed a motion 

to dismiss the complaint on June 8, 2006; 

WHEREAS, defendant Michael Byrd waived service of process and his response to the 

original complaint was due July 24, 2006; 

WHEREAS, plaintiff then decided to amend the complaint in lieu of opposing Brocade's 

motion to dismiss, and filed an amended complaint on July 14, 2006; 

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 28 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -1- Case No. C 06-CV-2786

STIPULATION RE: RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, plaintiff and defendant Brocade have agreed that defendant Brocade's 

response to the amended complaint will be due on August 14, 2006; 

WHEREAS, plaintiff and defendant Jack Cuthbert stipulated that Mr. Cuthbert's response 

to the amended complaint will be filed and served by August 28, 2006; 

WHEREAS, plaintiff and defendant Antonio Canova stipulated that Mr. Canova's response 

to the amended complaint will be filed and served by August 28, 2006; 

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. Defendant Michael Byrd's response to the amended complaint shall be served and 

filed by August 28, 2006. 

2. In the event plaintiff and Brocade enter into a further stipulation whereby Brocade's 

response to the complaint is changed from the current August 14, 2006 date, Mr. Byrd shall have 

two weeks after Brocade's response date to file his response to the amended complaint. 

DATED: July 20, 2006 Respectfully submitted, 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

 By /s/ 

 Patrick C. Doolittle 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MICHAEL BYRD 

DATED: July 20, 2006 SCHUBERT & REED LLP 

BRAGAR WEXLER & EAGEL, P.C. 

OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY & BROITMAN 

P.C. 

 By /s/

 Willem F. Jonckheer 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ANDREW E. ROTH 

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 28 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -2- Case No. C 06-CV-2786

STIPULATION RE: RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: 

 HONORABLE CHARLES BREYER 

 United States District Judge 

July 24, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 28 Filed 07/24/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 -3- Case No. C 06-CV-2786

STIPULATION RE: RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

I, Patrick C. Doolittle, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used 

to file this stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that the other 

signatory has concurred in this filing. 

DATED: July 20, 2006 Respectfully submitted, 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & 

HEDGES, LLP 

 By /s/ Patrick C. Doolittle 

 Patrick Doolittle 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MICHAEL BYRD 

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 28 Filed 07/24/06 Page 4 of 4