Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00857/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00857-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS J. MERRIDA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0857 FCD DAD P

vs.

COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by

the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which

requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

due to plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f)

and 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:10-cv-00857-FCD-DAD Document 12 Filed 06/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 1, 2010.

DAD:kly

merr0857.33a

Case 2:10-cv-00857-FCD-DAD Document 12 Filed 06/01/10 Page 2 of 2