Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00768/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00768-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on August 23, 2006, as 1

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Not at CSP-LAC.” However, plaintiff has

not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully

effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS LEE CANUP,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JAMES YATES,

Defendant. 

 /

1:06-cv-00768-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 4)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

TO OBEY A COURT ORDER (Doc. 1)

Plaintiff Thomas Lee Canup (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro

se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On August 16, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendation herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendation was to be filed within twenty days. To date,

plaintiff has not filed any objection.1

Case 1:06-cv-00768-OWW -SMS Document 6 Filed 11/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed August 16, 2006,

is ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on

plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s order of June 16, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 28, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00768-OWW -SMS Document 6 Filed 11/28/06 Page 2 of 2