Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02012/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-02012-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[Proposed] Order Regarding the 

Parties’ Notice of Pending Settlement Case No. 4:15-cv-02012-DMR

Edward M. Anaya (State Bar No. 233354)

Anaya Law

1559-B Sloat Blvd, #170

San Francisco, CA 94132-1222

Telephone: (415) 300-0871

E-mail: Anaya.legal@gmail.com

Plaintiff

 —and—

Robert M. Pattison (State Bar No. 103528)

JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

50 California Street, 9th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4615

Telephone: (415) 394-9400

Facsimile: (415) 394-9401

E-mail: pattisonr@jacksonlewis.com

Charles F. Seemann III, Of Counsel

JACKSON LEWIS, P.C.

650 Poydras Street, Suite 1900

New Orleans, Louisiana 70130

Telephone: (504) 208-1755

Facsimile: (504) 208-1759

E-mail: Charles.Seemann@jacksonlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD M. ANAYA, an individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PANDELL LAW FIRM, INC. PROFIT 

SHARING PLAN; ALEXANDER J. 

PANDELL; JANE CURRAN PANDELL; and 

DOES 1 – 50,

Defendant.

Case No. 4:15-cv-02012-DMR

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

THE PARTIES’ NOTICE OF PENDING 

SETTLEMENT

Ctrm.: 4 – 3

rd Fl.

Judge: Donna M. Ryu,

Magistrate Judge

Complaint Filed: 5/1/2015

AS MODIFIED

Case 4:15-cv-02012-DMR Document 18 Filed 07/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[Proposed] Order Regarding the 

Parties’ Notice of Pending Settlement Case No. 4:15-cv-02012-DMR

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The Court, having reviewed all papers related to the parties’ “Joint Notice of Pending 

Settlement and Stipulation of Dismissal as to Individual Defendants,” hereby approves the Notice 

and Stipulation as follows:

1. Defendants, Jane Curran Pandell and Alexander J. Pandell (collectively, 

“Individual Defendants”) are dismissed without prejudice; and

2. Plaintiff’s right to re-assert claims against the Individual Defendants is reserved, 

pending formal settlement.

3. The parties shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to submit a 

formal pleading that dismisses the action pursuant to settlement, or in the event settlement is not 

finalized, advising the Court of same.

4. All dates and deadlines applicable to the above-captioned action are suspended 

pending further order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: ______________________ ____________________________________

Donna M. Ryu, U.S. Magistrate Judge

4843-3392-6694, v. 1

The court withdraws its 7/29/15 order to provide a status report by 

8/12/15. July 30, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:15-cv-02012-DMR Document 18 Filed 07/30/15 Page 2 of 2