Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05653/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05653-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT MYERS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITIBANK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-05653-JSC 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action accompanied by an application to 

proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. No. 1.) On January 15, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to 

clarify his application to proceed in forma pauperis because in response to question 1, Plaintiff 

indicated that although he is not presently employed, his gross and net monthly income is $12,050. 

(Dkt. No. 5.) Plaintiff was given until January 29, 2015 to clarify his response. Plaintiff failed to 

do so and the Court denied the application without prejudice ordering Plaintiff to either pay the 

filing fee or file a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis by February 24, 2015. (Dkt. 

No. 6.) Plaintiff was warned that a failure to respond to the Court’s Order could result in 

dismissal of this action. Although the time to do so has passed, Plaintiff has failed to comply with 

the Court’s Order. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to 

prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2015

______________________________________

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-05653-JSC Document 8 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 1