Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01379/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-01379-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

Dister v. Benetton U.S.A. Corporation 

United States District Court – Northern Case No. 07 1379 MJJ Page 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP 

Patrick J. Hagan, Esq., SBN 68264 

Edward E. Hartley, Esq., SBN 122892 

Rodrigo E. Salas, Esq., SBN 194462 

225 Bush Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104-4207 

Telephone: (415) 397-2700 

Facsimile: (415) 397-3300 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BENETTON U.S.A. CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT DISTER, on behalf of himself and 

all others similarly situated, 

 PLAINTIFFS, 

 vs. 

BENETTON U.S.A. CORPORATION d/b/a 

UNITED COLORS OF BENETTON, 

 DEFENDANT 

CASE NO. 07 1379 MJJ 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND 

ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND 

CONTINUATION OF DEADLINES 

SET FORTH IN COURT’S INITIAL 

CASE SCHEDULE 

Complaint Filed: March 8, 2007 

WHEREAS, the Complaint filed by plaintiff Robert Dister (“Plaintiff”) was filed on 

March 8, 2007 against a single defendant, Benetton U.S.A. Corporation (“Defendant”); 

WHEREAS, on March 8, 2007 this Court issued its Order Setting Initial Case 

Management Conference and ADR Deadlines (“Initial Order”); 

WHEREAS, Defendant acknowledged receipt and service of the Complaint on April 

18, 2007; 

WHEREAS, by stipulation, Defendant’s response to the Complaint is due on June 25, 

2007; 

/// 

Case 3:07-cv-01379-SI Document 10 Filed 06/28/07 Page 1 of 3
Dister v. Benetton U.S.A. Corporation 

United States District Court – Northern Case No. 07 1379 MJJ Page 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties, through counsel, met and conferred on June 15, 2007 and 

agreed, in principle and subject to approval by this Court, of an extension of time to respond to 

the complaint and a continuation of the deadlines set forth in the Initial Order to allow the 

parties to assess the impact of recent opinions issued by other district judges in similar Fair and 

Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) cases; 

WHEREAS, Defendant has informally provided plaintiff’s counsel with the 

approximate number of transactions potentially at issue in this matter; 

WHEREAS, during the period encompassed by the proposed continuances, the parties 

intend to discuss the potential for early resolution of the claims in the complaint. 

THEREFORE, and subject to approval by this Court, the parties STIPULATE as 

follows: 

1. Defendant will respond to the complaint on or before August 24, 2007; 

2. The parties last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, 

ADR process selection, discovery plan, and to file joint ADR certification is continued from 

July 19, 2007 to September 7, 2007; 

3. The parties last day to file Rule 26 initial disclosures, and file a joint case 

management conference statement is continued from August 7, 2007 to September 14, 2007; 

and 

4. The initial case management conference is continued from August 14, 2007 to 

September 21, 2007. 

SO STIPULATED: 

 

Dated: June 18, 2007 KELLER GROVER, LLP 

 By __________/S/_______________________ 

 Eric A. Grover 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

/// 

Case 3:07-cv-01379-SI Document 10 Filed 06/28/07 Page 2 of 3
Dister v. Benetton U.S.A. Corporation 

United States District Court – Northern Case No. 07 1379 MJJ Page 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: June 18, 2007 DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP 

 By __________/S/_______________________ 

 Edward E. Hartley 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

FOR GOOD CAUSE, SO ORDERED: 

Dated: June ____, 2007 

 By _________________________________ 

Martin J. Jenkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 

 

24

Case 3:07-cv-01379-SI Document 10 Filed 06/28/07 Page 3 of 3