Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06478/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06478-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

---

Lowell T. Carruth, # 034065 

David L. Emerzian, #222930

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP

5 River Park Place East

Fresno, CA 93720-1501

Telephone: (559) 433-1300

Facsimile: (559) 433-2300

Attorneys for Defendant

JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION (U.S.),

formerly known as CONTAINER CORPORATION OF

AMERICA

(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

ALVARO MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

WAWONA FROZEN FOODS, a

California corporation, CONTAINER

CORPORATION OF AMERICAN, a

business, form unknown, SNORCCA, a

business, form unknown, SPEED AIRE, a

business, form unknown, BLACK

CORPORATION, WHITE

CORPORATION, DOES 1 through 100,

inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:03-CV-6478 LJO

STIPULATION TO DISMISS

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR F.R.C.P.

RULE 11 SANCTIONS AND TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

MONETARY SANCTIONS

 Date: June 17, 2005

 Time: 8:30 a.m.

 Room: Courtroom 6

Action Filed: October 2, 2002

Trial Date: September 7, 2005

Counsel for Defendant JEFFERSON SMURFITT CORPORATION (U.S.)

formerly known as CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA (hereafter referred to

as “Defendant”) and counsel for Plaintiff ALVARO MARTINEZ (hereafter “Plaintiff”)

hereby stipulate and agree to dismiss Defendant’s Motion for F.R.C.P. Rule 11

Sanctions, which has been set for hearing on June 17, 2005 at 8:30 a.m., in courtroom 6

of the above entitled court. Also, said counsels hereby stipulate and agree that counsel

Case 1:03-cv-06478-NEW Document 78 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 2
for Plaintiff will also withdraw his Request for Monetary Sanctions as requested in

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s F.R.C.P. Rule 11 Motion and Request for

Sanctions and Request for Monetary Sanctions. Each party is to bear its own costs in

connection with the preparation, opposition, and dismissal of the instant motions. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 7, 2005 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,

WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

By: /s/Lowell T. Carruth

Lowell T. Carruth

David L. Emerzian

Attorneys for Defendant

JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION

(U.S.), formerly known as CONTAINER

CORPORATION OF AMERICA

Dated: June 7, 2005 MAGILL LAW OFFICES

By: /s/Timothy Magill_________

Timothy Magill

Attorney for Plaintiff

ALVARO MARTINEZ

ORDER

Pursuant to the above Stipulation, Defendant’s Motion for F.R.C.P. Rule 11

Sanctions and Plaintiff’s Request for Monetary Sanctions are hereby dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 7, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06478-NEW Document 78 Filed 06/07/05 Page 2 of 2