Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02678/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02678-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTHONY RAUL BARRON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

J. WHITFIELD, 

Defendant.1

No. 2:11-cv-2678 JAM AC P 

ORDER 

 This court is in the process of reviewing the parties’ briefing in support of their crossmotions for summary judgment, scheduled for hearing before the undersigned on January 18, 

2017, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25. The parties’ respective replies are due Wednesday, 

January 11, 2010. To date, it appears that plaintiff alone has addressed the substantive decision 

issued in this case on March 12, 2013, by District Judge John A. Mendez. See ECF No. 29. 

Defendant’s counsel is directed to address the impact of Judge Mendez’ analysis to the issues 

remaining in this case, viz., the questions of custodial interrogation and retaliation. Defendant is 

granted extended time to file and serve his reply (or supplemental reply, if necessary), to this 

Friday, January 13, 2017, by 12:00 p.m. (noon). No further response is required or expected from 

plaintiff. 

 

1

 Because defendant J. Whitfield is the sole remaining defendant in this action, this case will be 

renamed accordingly. 

Case 2:11-cv-02678-JAM-AC Document 107 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Defendant shall, on or before Friday, January 13, 2017, at 12:00 p.m. (noon), file and 

serve a statement (set forth in defendant’s reply or a supplemental reply) that addresses the impact 

of Judge Mendez’ assessments of plaintiff’s claims of custodial interrogation and retaliation on 

the merits of the pending motions for summary judgment. 

 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to rename this case to indicate that defendant J. 

Whitfield is the sole remaining defendant. 

 SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 9, 2017 

Case 2:11-cv-02678-JAM-AC Document 107 Filed 01/09/17 Page 2 of 2