Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. & ORDER RE DAMAGES 

DISCOVERY SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 02-3378 JSW 

LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB No. 054283) 

 e-mail: lpasahow@fenwick.com 

J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148) 

 e-mail: dhadden@fenwick.com 

DARREN E. DONNELLY (CSB No. 194335) 

 e-mail: ddonnelly@fenwick.com 

CAROLYN CHANG (CSB No. 217933) 

 e-mail: cchang@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center, 801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, a 

Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA 

INTEGRATION, INC., formerly known as 

ACTA TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendant. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case No. C 02-03378 JSW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE DAMAGES DISCOVERY 

SCHEDULE 

Case 3:02-cv-03378 Document 203 Filed 05/05/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 205 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. & ORDER RE DAMAGES 

DISCOVERY SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 02-3378 JSW 

Opening expert reports on damages are currently scheduled to be due on May 8, 2006, 

with rebuttal expert reports scheduled to be due on May 29, 2006. BODI is currently still 

producing documents relevant to damages to produce. The 30(b)(6) deposition of BODI on 

damages issues is currently scheduled for May 19. Informatica is entitled to depose BODI before 

preparation and exchange of its opening damages expert report. In addition, Informatica is 

currently still producing documents relevant to damages. Informatica is also investigating the 

availability of a 30(b)(6) witness to testify on damages topics designated by BODI. BODI is 

entitled to depose Informatica before preparation and exchange of its opening damages expert 

report. As both parties are still engaging in damages discovery, the parties have agreed to extend 

the dates for the damages expert report, with a corresponding extension for damages discovery 

cut-off. The schedule for dispositive motions remains unchanged. The parties hereby 

respectfully request the Court adopt the schedule set forth below. 

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), attached hereto is a Declaration of Carolyn 

Chang setting forth (i) the reasons for the requested enlargement, (ii) a disclosure of all previous 

modifications in the case, and (iii) a description of the effect of the requested time modification 

on the schedule for the case. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel that: 

Event Date 

Parties to comply with Rule 26(a)(2)(B) in rebuttal/opposition 

with respect to technical issues on which the other party bears 

the burden of proof (“Rebuttal Technical Expert Reports”) 

May 10, 2006 (unchanged) 

Parties to comply with Rule 26(a)(2)(B) with respect to 

damages issues on which that party bears the burden of proof 

(“Opening Damages Expert Reports”) 

May 31, 2006 

Parties to comply with Rule 26(a)(2)(B) in rebuttal/opposition 

with respect to damages issues on which the other party bears 

the burden of proof (“Rebuttal Damages Expert Reports”) 

June 21, 2006 

Damages Discovery cut-off June 28, 2006 

Case 3:02-cv-03378 Document 203 Filed 05/05/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 205 Filed 05/11/06 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. & ORDER RE DAMAGES 

DISCOVERY SCHEDULE CASE NO. C 02-3378 JSW 

2

Dispositive motions filed June 16, 2006 (unchanged) 

Hearing on dispositive motions August 4, 2006 (unchanged) 

Dated: May 5, 2006 Respectfully submitted 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Carolyn Chang 

Carolyn Chang 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

Dated: May 5, 2006 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

By: /s/ Robert D. Tadlock 

Robert D. Tadlock 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA INTEGRATION, INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May __, 2006 

Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

United States District Court Judge 

Northern District of California 

Case 3:02-cv-03378 Document 203 Filed 05/05/2006 Page 3 of 3

11

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 205 Filed 05/11/06 Page 3 of 3