Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01660/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-01660-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCSSV1:415940.1

STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C 05-01660 CRB

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB

Sean A. Lincoln (SBN 136387)

I. Neel Chatterjee (SBN 173985)

Thomas J. Gray (SBN 191411)

Daniel J. Weinberg (SBN 227159)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: 650-614-7400

Facsimile: 650-614-7401

David Tauber (SBN 78385)

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC.

500 Macara Avenue

Sunnyvale, CA 94085

Telephone: 408-738-6200

Facsimile: 408-738-6203

Attorneys for 

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC and ALPHA LUK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

VERITY, INC., a Delaware corporation

Defendant.

Case No. C 05-01660 CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULE

VERITY, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Counter-complainant,

v.

INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, ALPHA LUK and ROES 1-10,

inclusive,

Counter-defendants.

Related Case No. C 04-05387 CRB

Case 3:05-cv-01660-SC Document 40 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCSSV1:415940.1 -1-

STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C 05-01660 CRB

CASE NO. C04-05387 CRB

Pursuant the Court’s Order dated July 8, 2005, the parties in the above entitled 

actions have agreed and hereby stipulate to amend the deadlines in this matter as follows. The 

parties agree that Verity’s stipulation herein is without prejudice to its right to seek a further 

modification of the schedule pursuant to conditions set forth in the Court’s Order of July 8, 2005.

Verity contends that Inxight’s continued delay in producing documents required by its experts to 

complete their reports will necessitate a further modification of the schedule. Inxight asserts that 

it will be producing all relevant documents shortly, that Verity created its own problem by 

retaining an expert with limited availability, and that no further continuance will be needed.

1. The deadline for written discovery and document production will remain 

July 29, 2005. The parties agree that depositions can be conducted through August 31, 2005.

2. The deadlines for exchanging expert reports and filing dispositive 

judgment motions will be extended by two weeks. The new deadline for the exchange of initial 

expert reports and the filing of dispositive motions shall be August 19, 2005. The new deadline 

for exchanging rebuttal expert reports and the close of expert discovery will be September 2, 

2005.

Dated: July 15, 2005 MANATT PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP

/s/

Christopher L. Wanger

Attorneys for VERITY, INC.

Dated: July 15, 2005 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

/s/

Thomas J. Gray

Attorneys for INXIGHT SOFTWARE, INC. and 

ALPHA LUK

ORDER

It Is So Ordered.

Dated: _____________________ __________________________________________

The Hon. Charles R. Breyer

United Stated District Judge

July 25, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-01660-SC Document 40 Filed 07/26/05 Page 2 of 2