Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00247/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00247-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 The parties’ letter briefs are found at Docket Nos. 140, 142 and 145.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JENSEN ENTERPRISES INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

AT&T INC., et al.,

Defendant. /

No. C 06-247 SI

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL

Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel the production of documents responsive to various

document requests and special interrogatories.1 AT&T states that it does not oppose making the

documents at issue available to plaintiff, but that it is physically and financially impossible for AT&T

to produce every responsive document because of the manner in which the documents are stored at

different district and regional offices. AT&T has offered to produce an electronic “joint trench log”

from the San Ramon office to plaintiff, and to allow plaintiff to visit any district office and copy

whatever documents plaintiff may deem relevant.

The Court finds that AT&T’s proposal is reasonable, and thus GRANTS plaintiff’s motion to

compel under those terms. The parties shall cooperate regarding locating and identifying responsive

documents during plaintiff’s inspections at district offices. If, after reviewing documents at the district

offices, plaintiff contends that this manner of production is insufficient, plaintiff may seek relief from

the Court. Any such renewed motion to compel shall specifically articulate why the documents at issue

are relevant to determining the market in this case, as well as why district office inspections are

Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 148 Filed 04/05/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

deficient.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 5, 2007 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-00247-SI Document 148 Filed 04/05/07 Page 2 of 2