Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04082/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04082-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 St. Paul filed its letter on July 19, 2005. Atmel filed a response on July 20, 2005.

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ATMEL CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

 /

No. C 04-04082 SI

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY CUT-OFF

DATE

By letter briefs,1 the parties have brought before the Court a dispute involving the discovery cutoff date for this action. The Court finds that the parties should meet-and-confer to determine the proper

extension of the discovery cut-off date, given that parties agree that the date should be extended. The

Court agrees with Atmel’s assertion that the January 23, 2006 trial date should remain in place. 

If the parties are unable to agree to a new discovery cut-off date, then the parties should bring

that to the Court’s attention and it can be resolved through letter briefs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 8/1/05

 /s/ Susan Illston 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:04-cv-04082-SI Document 160 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 1