Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02069/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02069-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In Re WAL-MART STORES, INC.

WAGE AND HOUR LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Case Nos.

C06-2069 SBA (Smith) and

C06-5411 SBA (Ballard)

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Nos. C06-2069 SBA (BZ) & 

 C06-5411 SBA (BZ)

SIXTH DISCOVERY ORDER

To the extent that Wal-Mart’s August 17 letter

constitutes a request for reconsideration, it is DENIED. It

should be obvious to Wal-Mart that the court was not

improperly influenced by plaintiffs’ assertion that Wal-Mart

had not produced any documents. The Fifth Discovery Order

expressly states that Wal-Mart need not produce documents it

has already produced. If Wal-Mart believes there was a Rule

11 violation, it has its remedies.

It should also be obvious to Wal-Mart that proposing time

tables for producing documents that were first sought on May

Case 4:06-cv-02069-SBA Document 129 Filed 08/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

15, 2007, which contemplate production long after the class

certification issues are briefed or heard is unacceptable. 

Nonetheless, the court ORDERS that the deadlines contained in

the Fifth Discovery Order [except for lodging the meet and

confer record] are each extended by one week.

Dated: August 20, 2007

 Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\SMITH.WALMART\DISC6.ORD.wpd

Case 4:06-cv-02069-SBA Document 129 Filed 08/20/07 Page 2 of 2