Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00108/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00108-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LENT N. KING,

Plaintiff,

vs.

G. TRACY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-00108-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND

DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS (Docs. 1 and 8)

Plaintiff Lent N. King (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On November 7, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the

Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. 

To date, plaintiff has not filed any objection to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:06-cv-00108-AWI -SMS Document 19 Filed 01/16/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 7,

2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s complaint,

filed February 1, 2006, against defendant Gomez for use of

excessive force, in violation of the Eighth Amendment;

3. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical care claims are

DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted under section 1983;

4. Plaintiff’s due process claims are DISMISSED for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under

section 1983;

5. Plaintiff’s “Personal Injury” and “Cruel and Unusual

Punishment” claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted under section 1983; and,

6. Defendants Tracy, Trujillo, Chavira, Portillo, Raya,

Soto, Auran, Cruz, Leos, Prince, and Maciel are DISMISSED based

on plaintiff’s failure to state any claims upon which relief may

be granted against them under section 1983.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00108-AWI -SMS Document 19 Filed 01/16/07 Page 2 of 2