Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01892/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01892-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAURICE CALDWELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 12-cv-01892-EDL 

ORDER FOLLOWING FURTHER 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Re: Dkt. Nos. 331, 332

As stated at the December 15, 2015 further case management conference, the Court 

modifies the pretrial schedule as follows:

Initial Expert Disclosures: January 22, 2016

Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: February 12, 2016

Further Case Management Conference: February 16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.

Expert Discovery Cut-Off: March 18, 2016

Pre-Trial Conference: May 17, 2016 at 4:00 p.m.

The Parties shall file an updated joint case management conference statement by February 9, 2016. 

If the Court does not set a summary judgment hearing, the Parties’ joint case management 

conference statement shall include a proposed briefing schedule for a prompt motion regarding 

whether Plaintiff’s guilt or innocence of the 1990 murder of Judy Acosta is at issue. Otherwise, 

the Parties shall file a joint proposed briefing schedule on this issue at least four days prior to the 

summary judgment hearing. The Parties are also ordered to meet and confer on the trial date in 

consultation with the Court’s courtroom deputy.

Additionally, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ request for leave to file a thirty-six page 

Case 3:12-cv-01892-EDL Document 341 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

reply brief in support of their motion for summary judgment. If necessary, Plaintiff may file a 

supplemental responding brief of no more than ten pages by December 23, 2015.

Finally, the Court sets a December 16, 2015 deadline for Defendants to file a declaration 

pursuant to Local Civil Rule 79-5(e) establishing that the exhibits referenced in Plaintiff’s 

administrative motion to file under seal (Dkt. 324) are sealable. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 15, 2015

________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:12-cv-01892-EDL Document 341 Filed 12/15/15 Page 2 of 2