Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03352/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03352-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL LEVIN, ET AL., 

Plaintiffs,

 v.

 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Defendant. /

No. 3:14-cv-03352-CRB

ORDER RE COYNE V. CITY AND

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

The City and County of San Francisco is hereby ORDERED to respond to Levin's

Letter of October 12, 2015 (dkt. 121) regarding whether Coyne v. City and County of San

Francisco obviates the need for a Rule 60 indicative ruling in this case. The City is further

ORDERED to respond by Wednesday, October 28, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 22, 2015 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-03352-CRB Document 122 Filed 10/22/15 Page 1 of 1