Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01404/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01404-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKA ALFARO,

Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-01404 WBS KJN PS

v.

MARTHA GILBERT,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On June 8, 2010, plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel, filed her complaint

and an application to proceed informa pauperis. (Dkt. Nos. 1, 2.) On June 11, 2010, the

undersigned entered proposed findings and recommendations recommending the denial of

plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. No. 3.) On July 21, 2010, United

States District Judge William B. Shubb adopted those proposed findings and recommendations. 

(Dkt. No. 4.) Judge Shubb denied plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and

provided plaintiff with 21 days from the date of that order to pay the initial filing fee of $350.00.

The court’s docket reveals that plaintiff has not filed paid the filing fee as required

by the court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s case be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Case 2:10-cv-01404-WBS-KJN Document 5 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Id.; see also E. Dist. Local Rule 304(b). 

Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed with the court and served on

all parties within fourteen days after service of the objections. E. Dist. Local Rule 304(d). 

Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d

1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED. 

DATED: January 5, 2011

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-01404-WBS-KJN Document 5 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 2