Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07660/USCOURTS-ca4-14-07660-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7660

THOMAS EVERETTE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

REGINA W. PEELE; CREDITED SOLUTIONS; KIM D. SAUNDER; HAROLD 

G. SELLARS; MECHANICS AND FARMERS BANKS; THOMAS W. KING; THE 

LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS W. KING; W. DUDLEY WHITLEY, III; SCOTT 

A. MCKELLAR; DAVID W. GREEN; BATTLE, WINSLOW, SCOTT AND 

WILEY P.A.; LAWYER MUTUAL; CRYSTAL BROWN; URSULA SHORT; 

CAROL A. WHITE; EDGECOMBE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT; DENNIS A. 

COLEY; BRIAN T. COREY; IVORY JOHNSON; JAMES I. KNIGHT; 

EDGECOMBE COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE; EDGECOMBE COUNTY ANIMAL; 

EDGECOMBE COUNTY; JANET WATSON; WATSON PROPERTY CORPORATION; 

B. C. EASON, JR.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:14-cv-00213-BO)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Everette, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7660 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/20/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Everette, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 

civil complaint after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review. 

Limiting our review to the issues raised in Everette’s 

objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 

and his informal brief, see Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841,

845–46 (4th Cir. 1985); 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. Everette v. Peele, No. 5:14-cv00213-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 14-7660 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/20/2015 Pg: 2 of 2