Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01664/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01664-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STV ASIA LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

PRN CORPORATION ET Al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-06-1664 JCS

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO FILE A MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND

CLARIFICATION OF ORDER DATED

JUNE 22, 2006 [Docket No. 64]

Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration and Clarification

of Order Dated June 22, 2006 (“the Motion”), pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3). Under Local

Rule 7-9(b)(3), a party may bring a motion for reconsideration if there has been “[a] manifest failure

by the Court to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments which were presented to the

Court before such interlocutory order.” Plaintiff has not met this standard and therefore, the Motion

is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 23, 2006

___________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01664-JCS Document 77 Filed 08/23/06 Page 1 of 1