Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00593/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00593-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALONSO LIZARRAGA RIOS, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

ALBERTO GONZALES, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-00593-OWW-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 11)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

(Doc. 8)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

On May 16, 2006, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241 in this Court.

On June 21, 2006, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss, contending that the instant

petition was moot because Petitioner had already been lawfully removed from the United States. 

(Doc. 8). September 13, 2006, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Recommendation recommending the motion to dismiss be granted and that the petition for writ

of habeas corpus be dismissed. (Doc. 11). This Report and Recommendation was served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty days from the date

of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Report and

Case 1:06-cv-00593-OWW -TAG Document 14 Filed 12/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed June 26, 2006 (Doc. 11), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00593-OWW -TAG Document 14 Filed 12/18/06 Page 2 of 2