Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04355/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04355-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARSHALL LOSKOT

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARSHALL LOSKOT, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES:HELPING

YOU HELP OTHERS, a California public

benefit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ROYAL THAI; ANNA B. FLYNN, an

individual; ALBERTA L. BONDOC, an

individual; and AMORNPAKARN, INC.,

a California corporation,

Defendants. ___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-4355 EDL

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“ Agreement”) herein, each party is to bear its

own costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511

U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of

settlement agreements).

///

///

Case 3:04-cv-04355-EDL Document 25 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: October 14, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Jennifer L. Steneberg

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARSHALL LOSKOT,

an individual; and DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION SERVICES

Dated: October 21, 2005 GORDON & REES LLP

By: /s/ Brian P. Maschler

Brian P. Maschler

Marcie Isom

Attorneys for defendants ANNA B. FLYNN;

ALBERTA L. BONDOC; and AMORNPAKARN,

INC.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

DATED: ________________, 2005

______________________________________

Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

October 24,

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANTED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:04-cv-04355-EDL Document 25 Filed 10/24/05 Page 2 of 2