Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02397/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02397-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2397

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES; NEW TECHNOLOGY HOME-BROADCASTING BUSINESS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:14-cv-03609-JFM)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2397 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to 

state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Randolph v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-03609-JFM (D. Md. 

Dec. 12, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 14-2397 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2