Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01592/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01592-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 1

803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHANDRA KISHOR, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-1592 GEB KJM P

vs.

D. K. SISTO, Warden,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se, challenging his 1999 Sacramento

County conviction for a number of charges. Petitioner’s habeas petition was filed with the court

on July 18, 2006, and an amended petition was filed on March 2, 2007. The court’s own records

reveal that on June 6, 2003, petitioner filed a petition attacking the same conviction. (No. Civ. S03-1219 LKK CMK P ). Due to the duplicative nature of the present action, the court will 1

recommend that the petition be dismissed.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action

be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the District Judge assigned

to this case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being

Case 2:06-cv-01592-GEB -KJM Document 8 Filed 05/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the

court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 2, 2007.

2

kish1592.23

Case 2:06-cv-01592-GEB -KJM Document 8 Filed 05/03/07 Page 2 of 2