Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05156/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05156-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BLINGLET, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

AMBER ALERT SAFETY CENTERS, INC., 

et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-05156 SI

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY

LETTER 

(Docket No. 47)

Plaintiff has submitted a letter to the Court detailing the status of the parties’ efforts to schedule

depositions of certain witnesses. Plaintiff has recently filed an amended complaint alleging new theories

against new defendants, and defendant Amber Alert has recently had a change of counsel. As a result,

certain deposition dates have been delayed and other depositions have yet to be scheduled.

From plaintiff’s letter, it is not clear what action plaintiff wishes the Court to take. Plaintiff

simply states at the end of the letter that, “To the extent the Court is willing to schedule a conference

call among counsel to discuss these issues, we welcome the Court’s intervention.” The Court will, at

the parties’ request, schedule either a formal case management conference or a telephone conference,

but the Court will not referee abstract discovery concerns prior to serious and concrete efforts by the

parties to resolve the disputes themselves. Nothing in the letter briefs suggests that they have done so

yet, so the pending request is DENIED..

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05156-SI Document 48 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 1