Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00187/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00187-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEOBARDO U. CHAVEZ-BARRIENTOS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

U.S. DEP'T OF HOMELAND )

SECURITY IMMIGRATION & )

CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-00187-AWI-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 9)

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF

JURISDICTION AND TRANSFERRING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS TO COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE NINTH CIRCUIT AS A PETITION

FOR REVIEW

(Doc. 7)

Petitioner is proceeding with a Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On February 27, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be

TRANSFERRED to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit as a

Petition for Review, and Respondent's motion to dismiss be GRANTED

on that particular ground ONLY. These Findings and Recommendations

were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections

were to be filed within fifteen (15) days from the date of service

of that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely

Case 1:05-cv-00187-AWI-DLB Document 10 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 27,

2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss, filed January 4, 2006, is

GRANTED on the ground that this Court lacks jurisdiction; and

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is TRANSFERRED to

the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit as a Petition for

Review.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00187-AWI-DLB Document 10 Filed 04/13/06 Page 2 of 2