Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05659/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05659-56/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHTEK TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

uPI SEMICONDUCTOR

CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-05659 WHA

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE

A prior order ruled that the current stay shall remain in effect until the remand

proceedings in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-698 are concluded, as uPI asserted a defense

therein that it has also asserted in this case. The parties have notified the Court that the ALJ at

the ITC has issued a remand recommended determination and that the target date for concluding

the ITC investigation is January 8, 2016. 

The joint status report does not address the status of uPI’s consent defense. By

OCTOBER 22 AT NOON, the parties shall each file a brief NOT TO EXCEED THREE PAGES setting

forth their positions as to whether that defense remains live. To be clear, this is not an

opportunity to seek reconsideration of the prior order maintaining the stay.

Dated: October 19, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-05659-WHA Document 435 Filed 10/19/15 Page 1 of 1