Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01622/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01622-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY E. FELDER, 

 

Plaintiff, 

 

vs. 

 

HENSON, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 1:13-cv-01622-AWI-JLT (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT 

DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

(Docs. 21, 38)

Plaintiff, Anthony E. Felder, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 

with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff is 

proceeding on his First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 12.) Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on 

March 4, 2014. (Doc. 21.) On September 11, 2015, the Magistrate Judge recommended 

Defendants' motion to dismiss be granted and that Plaintiff be allowed to file a second amend 

complaint. (Doc. 38.) The Findings and Recommendations was served on the parties that same 

date and allowed for objections to be filed within twenty-one days. (Id.) Despite a lapse of more 

than the time allowed, neither side has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

/ / /

Case 1:13-cv-01622-AWI-JLT Document 39 Filed 10/19/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, issued on September 11, 2015, is adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed on March 4, 2014 (Doc. 21) is granted; and

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must either file 

a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the Findings and 

Recommendations; or

4. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed for failure to 

obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 16, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01622-AWI-JLT Document 39 Filed 10/19/15 Page 2 of 2