Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06423/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06423-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

- 1 - 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION 

Case No. C06-06423 MJJ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

V ENABLE LLP 

2049 CENTURY PARK EAST 

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 

VENABLE LLP 

JOANNA M. ESTY, ESQ. (SBN 147903) 

JENNA F. LEAVITT, ESQ. (SBN 213574) 

2049 Century Park East, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Telephone: (310) 229-9900 

Facsimile: (310) 229-9901 

E-mail: jesty@venable.com 

E-mail: jleavitt@venable.com 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

CREDIT CARD FRAUD CONTROL CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INGENIO, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ACACIA PATENT ACQUISITION 

CORPORATION, ACACIA RESEARCH 

CORPORATION, AND CREDIT CARD 

FRAUD CONTROL CORPORATION, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 06-06423 MJJ 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE (FRCP 41) AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

CREDIT CARD FRAUD CONTROL 

CORPORATION, 

 Counterclaimant, 

 v. 

INGENIO, INC., a Delaware corporation; 

PILGRIM TELEPHONE, INC., a 

Delaware corporation, 

 Counterdefendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case 3:06-cv-06423-MJJ Document 36 Filed 03/12/07 Page 1 of 3
- 2 - 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION 

Case No. C06-06423 MJJ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

V ENABLE LLP 

2049 CENTURY PARK EAST, FIRMADDRESS21_2 

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Ingenio, Inc. and Defendants Acacia Patent Acquisition 

Corporation and Acacia Research Corporation and Defendant/Counterclaimant Credit Card Fraud 

Control Corporation hereby stipulate as follows: that the above-captioned action be and hereby is 

dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1): 

1. The parties have entered into a confidential settlement agreement settling the abovecaptioned matter; 

2. The parties agree to entry of this Stipulated Order of Dismissal, dismissing with 

prejudice all claims and counterclaims against each other; 

3. The parties further agree that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs; 

4. The parties further agree that, for the purpose of these voluntary dismissals, no party is 

considered the “prevailing party” within the meaning of Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure; 

5. The parties further agree to this Stipulation being made an Order of the Court; 

6. The parties further request that this Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the confidential 

settlement agreement. 

 By her signature below, counsel for Defendants and Defendant/Counterclaimant swears under 

penalty of perjury that, pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, counsel for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

concurred in the filing of this document. 

Respectfully submitted this 7th day of March, 2007 

 

 By: ______/s/_____________________ 

Jenna F. Leavitt 

VENABLE LLP 

2049 Century Park East, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

(310) 229-9900 

(310) 229-9901 Facsimile 

Attorneys for Defendants and 

Defendant/Counterclaimant 

Case 3:06-cv-06423-MJJ Document 36 Filed 03/12/07 Page 2 of 3
- 3 - 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION 

Case No. C06-06423 MJJ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

V ENABLE LLP 

2049 CENTURY PARK EAST, FIRMADDRESS21_2 

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 

Respectfully submitted this 7th day of March, 2007 

 

 By: ______/s/_____________________ 

Christopher J. Cox 

WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES 

201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

(650) 802-3029 

(650) 802-3100 Facsimile 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ________________________ 

 _______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

3/9/2007

Case 3:06-cv-06423-MJJ Document 36 Filed 03/12/07 Page 3 of 3