Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00907/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00907-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

{12795/15369/LBG/923246.DOC;} 1 Stip. & [Proposed] Order for Ext. of Time 

for Def. Payne, et al. to Respond to Complaint 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Louise Burda Gilbert, California State Bar No. 70957 

weintraub genshlea chediak

a law corporation 

400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: 916/558-6000 

Facsimile: 916/446-1611 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Payne, Thompson, Walker & Taaffe 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING 

ENGINEERS LOCAL 3; BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES OF THE PENSION TRUST FUND 

FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 3; 

JOHN BONILLA; GIL CROSTHWAITE; 

ROBERT DOUB; THOMAS HOLSMAN; 

JOHN HUMBER; JIM MURRAY; RICHARD 

PIOMBO; RENE VERERUYSSEN; KEN 

WALTERS; LANCE WILHELM; CURTIS 

BROOKS; RUSS BURNS; CARL GOFF; 

FRANK HERRERA; T. ROBERT MILLER; 

WALT POWERS; JOE VIEIRA; ROB WISE, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

McMORGAN & CO.; McMORGAN & 

COMPANY LLC; LIFFEY, LLC; STANTON, 

KAY & WATSON; WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD; VAN BOURG, WEINBERG, 

ROGER & ROSENFELD; JAMES WATSON; 

BARRY HINKLE; EDWARD MEVI; DAVID 

HOWARD; PAYNE, THOMPSON, WALKER 

& TAAFFE; and DOES 1 to 100 inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CIV.S-06-0907 WBS EFB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

PAYNE, THOMPSON, WALKER & TAAFFE 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers Local 3, et al. (“plaintiffs”) and 

defendant Payne, Thompson, Walker & Taaffe (“Payne”), by and through their 

counsel, hereby stipulate to 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00907-WBS -EFB Document 72 Filed 10/20/06 Page 1 of 3
{12795/15369/LBG/923246.DOC;} 2 Stip. & [Proposed] Order for Ext. of Time 

for Def. Payne, et al. to Respond to Complaint 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

/ / / 

an extension of time, up to and including December 18, 2006, for Payne to 

respond to plaintiffs’ complaint. 

Plaintiffs will be filing amended complaints on October 24, 2006. 

A motion made by defendant Liffey was pending, but has been taken off 

calendar. 

The parties have scheduled a mediation for December 4 and 5, 2006 that 

may impact the need for further proceedings. 

No prejudice will occur if the time for Payne to respond is extended as 

requested. 

Dated: October 18, 2006 Respectfully submitted, 

 WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK

 a law corporation 

 By: /S/ Louise Burda Gilbert 

 Louise Burda Gilbert 

 State Bar No. 70957 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 Payne, Thompson, Walker & Taaffe 

Dated: October 18, 2006 MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK, MILLER, 

 JOHNSON & UHRHAMMER

A Professional Corporation 

 By: /S/ Amanda Uhrhammer 

 Amanda Uhrhammer 

 State Bar No. 199445 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that defendant Payne Thompson Walker & Taaffe shall 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00907-WBS -EFB Document 72 Filed 10/20/06 Page 2 of 3
{12795/15369/LBG/923246.DOC;} 3 Stip. & [Proposed] Order for Ext. of Time 

for Def. Payne, et al. to Respond to Complaint 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

have up to and including December 18, 2006 to respond to the plaintiffs’ 

complaint. 

Dated: October 19, 2006 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00907-WBS -EFB Document 72 Filed 10/20/06 Page 3 of 3