Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03843/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03843-37/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CASE. NO. 04-03843 RMW (HRL)

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

H. CHRISTIAN L’ORANGE (State Bar No. 71730)

BENJAMIN J. HOLL (State Bar No. 200630)

MICHAEL P. PULLIAM (State Bar No. 215435)

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

50 Fremont Street, 20

th

Floor

San Francisco, California 94105-2235

Telephone: (415) 591-7500

Facsimile: (415) 591-7510

WILLIAM J. CASS, ESQ., pro hac vice

ANDREW C. RYAN, ESQ., pro hac vice

THOMAS J. MANGO, ESQ, pro hac vice

CANTOR COLBURN LLP

55 Griffin Road South

Bloomfield, Connecticut 06002

Telephone: (860) 286-2929

Facsimile (860) 286-0115

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant

MEMRY CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

____________________________________

MEMRY CORPORATION, ) Case No. CV-04-03843 RMW (HRL)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

KENTUCKY OIL TECHNOLOGY, N.V., )

PETER BESSELINK AND MEMORY )

METAL HOLLAND B.V., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

)

KENTUCKY OIL TECHNOLOGY, N.V., )

)

Counterclaimant, )

)

v. )

)

MEMRY CORPORATION and )

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY )

CORPORATION, )

)

Counterdefendants. )

____________________________________)

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CLARIFYING ORDER CONTINUING

CERTAIN DEADLINES BECAUSE OF

EMERGENCY UNAVAILABILITY

Date: November 8, 2007

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Ctrm.: 6

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 818 Filed 10/24/07 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER

CASE. NO. 04-03843 RMW (HRL)

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS on October 23, 2007 Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V. (“Kentucky Oil”) and

Schlumberger Technology Corporation (“Schlumberger”) filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order

Continuing Certain Pretrial Deadlines Because of Emergency Unavailability (“Stipulation and

Proposed Order”) due to the fact that Kentucky Oil’s trial counsel, Nicola A. Pisano, and his family

have evacuated their home and Mr. Pisano’s office has closed as a result of the fires in San Diego;

WHEREAS on October 24, 2007 Memry filed an Assent to the Proposed Stipulation;

WHEREAS on October 24, 2007 the Court entered the Proposed Order extending certain

pretrial deadlines as between counsel for Kentucky Oil and Schlumberger;

WHEREAS counsel for Memry and Kentucky Oil now wish to clarify that the Order apply to

due dates as between Memry and Kentucky Oil as well;

WHEREAS Schlumberger does not object to pre-trial extensions being applied as to Memry

and Kentucky as well.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Kentucky Oil and Memry, by and through

their respective counsel of record:

1. Kentucky Oil’s oppositions to Memry’s motions in limine and Memry’s oppositions to

Kentucky Oil’s motions in limine may be filed October 29, 2007, rather than on October 25, 2007;

2. The following documents to be filed and served by Kentucky Oil, Schlumberger and

Memry may be filed and served October 29, 2007 rather than October 25, 2007;

a. Objections to the use of deposition excerpts or other discovery responses;

b. Counter-designations;

c. Objections to proposed voir dire, proposed findings, proposed verdict forms, or

to the authenticity or admissibility of any trial exhibits; and

3. The parties’ Joint Pretrial Statement may be filed on October 29, 2007 rather than

October 26, 2007.

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 818 Filed 10/24/07 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER

CASE. NO. 04-03843 RMW (HRL)

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: October _24_, 2007 LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP

By: __/s/ Michael H. Bierman_____________

Michael H. Bierman

Attorneys for Defendant and ounterclaimant

Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V. and Defendants

Peter Besselink and Memory Metal Holland, B.V.

DATED: October _24_, 2007 CANTOR COLBURN LLP

By: _ /s/ Andrew C. Ryan___________________

William J. Cass

Cantor Colburn LLP

Attorneys for Counterdefendant

Schlumberger Technology Corporation

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 818 Filed 10/24/07 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER

CASE. NO. 04-03843 RMW (HRL)

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is ordered that:

1. Kentucky Oil’s oppositions to Memry’s motions in limine and Memry’s oppositions to

Kentucky Oil’s motions in limine may be filed October 29, 2007, rather than October 25, 2007.

2. The following documents to be filed and served by Kentucky Oil, Schlumberger and

Memry may be filed and served October 29, 2007 rather than October 25, 2007;

a. Objections to the use of deposition excerpts of other discovery responses;

b. Counter-designations; and

c. Objections to proposed voir dire, proposed findings, proposed verdict forms, or

the authenticity or admissibility of any trial exhibits.

3. The parties joint pre-trial statement may be filed October 29, 2007 rather than October

26, 2007.

DATED: October __24___, 2007 By: _______________________ 

Ronald M. Whyte

Judge, United States District Court

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 817 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 4 of 4 Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 818 Filed 10/24/07 Page 4 of 4