Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00247/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00247-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, to which plaintiff failed to file timely opposition. 

Apparently in response to the court’s order directing plaintiff to file opposition, plaintiff now

concedes that the merits of defendant’s motion are well-taken in light of plaintiff’s apparent

intent to pursue an administrative claim. The court will not address the merits of defendant’s

motion in light of plaintiff’s request to dismiss this action.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY CRUMP,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-247 MCE KJM PS

vs.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has requested that this action be dismissed. As provided by Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(a), plaintiff's request shall be honored.1

Plaintiff is advised that the United States District Court does not have a “Federal

Claims Department” and that mailing a claim to the United States District Court is insufficient

for purposes of presenting a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00247-MCE -KJM Document 25 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed. 

DATED: May 13, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

crump.59

Case 2:05-cv-00247-MCE -KJM Document 25 Filed 05/16/05 Page 2 of 2