Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04909/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-04909-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 30:181 Environment: Review of Agency Action

---

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DB2/21566797.1 CASE NO. C 09-04909 CRB 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

CLIFFORD D. SETHNESS (State Bar No. 212975) 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

300 South Grand Avenue 

Twenty-second Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132 

Telephone: 213.612.2500 

Facsimile: 213.612.2501 

csethness@morganlewis.com 

L. JULIUS M. TURMAN (State Bar No. 226126) 

SACHA M. STEENHOEK (State Bar No. 253743) 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

jturman@morganlewis.com 

ssteenhoek@morganlewis.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ELLIOTT FLOWERS, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 09-04909 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME TO RESPOND TO 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

[LOCAL RULE 6-1(A)] 

Case 3:09-cv-04909-CRB Document 19 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 3
IS &

P 

AW

O

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DB2/21566797.1 2 CASE NO. C 09-04909 CRB 

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

RECITALS

WHEREAS, on October 15, 2009, Plaintiff Elliott Flowers (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint 

(“Complaint”) in this Court against Defendant Pacific Maritime Association (“Defendant”); 

WHEREAS, on December 21, 2009, Plaintiff requested Defendant to waive service of 

summons; 

WHEREAS, on January 6, 2010, Defendant’s counsel signed and returned to Plaintiff the 

Waiver of Service of Summons of Plaintiff’s Complaint; 

WHEREAS, on January 14, 2010, before Defendant filed an Answer to Plaintiff’s 

Complaint or otherwise made an appearance in this Court, Plaintiff filed a First Amended 

Complaint (“FAC”) with this Court; 

WHEREAS, because Defendant has not made an appearance in this case, on January 19, 

2010, Plaintiff requested that Defendant’s counsel waive service of the FAC; 

WHEREAS, on January 26, 2010, Defendant’s counsel signed and returned the Waiver of 

Service form to Plaintiff; 

WHEREAS, Defendant believed and continues to believe that it has 60 days following the 

latest request for waiver of service of process in which to file an Answer to Plaintiff’s FAC under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(3); 

WHEREAS, in an abundance of caution, Defendant has requested, and Plaintiff has 

agreed, to extend the time in which Defendant must file an Answer to Plaintiff’s FAC thirty (30) 

days to March 22, 2010; 

WHEREAS, Defendant has not previously requested an extension of time to Answer 

Plaintiff’s Complaint or FAC; and 

WHEREAS, the stipulated extension of time will not require the modification of any 

deadlines previously set by the Court. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between 

the undersigned counsel for all parties, that the time for Defendants to answer, plead, move 

against, or otherwise respond to the FAC in this action shall be extended until March 26, 2010. 

Plaintiff agrees not to treat any failure to respond by any Defendant before that time as a default. 

Case 3:09-cv-04909-CRB Document 19 Filed 02/26/10 Page 2 of 3
ORDERS as follows:

before March 26, 2010.

Based on the foregoing Stipulation, and for good cause appearing, the Court hereby

Attorneys for Defendant

PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION

Attorneys for PlaintiffElliott Flowers

LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS

B~~-

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKlUS LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Defendant Pacific Maritime Association shall have a thirty (30) day extension to answer

or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs FAC.

Accordingly, Defendant's response to Plaintiffs FAC shall be filed and served on or

Dated: February 24, 2010

Dated: February 24, 2010

20

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: . ,2010

HON. CHARLESR. BREYER

United States District Judge

DR2/215fifi7971 3 CASE NO. C 09-04909 CRB

Feb. 25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-04909-CRB Document 19 Filed 02/26/10 Page 3 of 3