Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-03025/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-03025-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

- 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 084965 (CA)

JONATHAN T. PECK, SBN 12303 (VA)

MARCIA L. MITCHELL, SBN 18122 (WA)

U.S. EEOC

350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone No. (415) 625-5651

Fax No. (415) 625-5657

Attorneys for Plaintiff

OLIVER JONES - SBN #64254

SUANE THOMPSON

JONES & THOMPSON

6334 Telegraph Avenue

Oakland, CA 94609

Telephone: (510) 655-7786

Attorneys for Plaintiff

D. GREGORY VALENZA - SBN 161250

CHARLES G. WILLIAMS - SBN 172907

JACKSON LEWIS LLP

199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 394-9400

Fax: (415) 394-9401

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

 Plaintiff

CHE PRESANT,

Plaintiff- Intervenor

vs.

ALLTECH, INC.,

Defendant

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: No. C 04 3025 SBA

STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION 

OF CONDITIONAL ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL AND/OR MOTION TO 

REOPEN CASE

(AND ORDER)

Case 4:04-cv-03025-SBA Document 50 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 4
- 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties to the above-entitled action hereby stipulate as follows:

1. On September 22, 2005 this court held a Case Management Conference for this 

action and related cases (C04-3309 and C05-1831). During the conference, the 

parties informed the court that they believed they had reached an agreement to 

settle this case and the related cases. The EEOC, Alltech and Ms. Presant also 

informed the court that they intended to file a Settlement Agreement specific to 

this action that included a provision for the court to retain jurisdiction over the 

case for the purpose of enforcing the Settlement Agreement. 

2. The court subsequently entered an Order Dismissing Action on September 23, 

2005. Pursuant to the order, the case would be dismissed with prejudice unless 

any party moved to reopen the case within thirty days. The EEOC, Alltech and 

Ms. Presant understood that the case would not be dismissed as long as they filed 

the Settlement Agreement prior to the expiration of thirty days.

3. On October 20, 2004, Charles G. Williams, attorney for Alltech, Inc., informed 

EEOC attorney, Marcia L. Mitchell about an issue between Alltech and the EEOC 

which Alltech had not previously addressed and which requires resolution before 

Alltech will approve the settlement. The decision makers at the EEOC are out of 

the office and unavailable to address the issue before October 24, 2005, the 

deadline for the parties to file the Settlement Agreement and to avoid a dismissal

of the casepursuant to the terms of the court’s order. 

4. EEOC and Ms. Presant agree that it is premature to dismiss the case at this time

so that EEOC and Alltech may resolve the outstanding issue that currently 

Deleted: 

Case 4:04-cv-03025-SBA Document 50 Filed 12/13/05 Page 2 of 4
- 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

impedes settlement. Alltech is not opposed to an extension of the court’s previous 

30 day limit for an additional 30 days. 

5. The parties also agree that it remains likely that the case will still settle. The 

parties therefore are not asking the court to reschedule the trial date at this time. 

Instead, they are asking the court to extend the deadline for filing the Settlement 

Agreement by an additional thirty days (until November 23, 2005).

On behalf of Plaintiff: On behalf of Plaintiff-Intervenor

 /s/ /s/ by phone approval 

 

MARCIA L. MITCHELL OLIVER JONES

Senior Trial Attorney Jones & Thompson

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

 OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

 

On behalf of Defendant:

 /s/ by e-mail approval 

CHARLES G. WILLIAMS

Jackson Lewis LLP

Case 4:04-cv-03025-SBA Document 50 Filed 12/13/05 Page 3 of 4
- 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The court having considered the stipulation of the parties now orders as follows:

1. The Order Dismissing Action dated September 23, 2005 is hereby vacated.

2. This action and all claims stated herein is hereby dismissed with prejudice. In the 

event that the settlement is not reached, any party may move to reopen the case and 

the trial will be rescheduled, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days of this 

order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NUNC PRO TUNC

DATED: 10/23/05 

HONORABLE SANDRA B. ARMSTRONG

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:04-cv-03025-SBA Document 50 Filed 12/13/05 Page 4 of 4