Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02888/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02888-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 151
Nature of Suit: Overpayments under the Medicare Act
Cause of Action: 28:2345 Medicare Recovery

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAGE LIMITS CASE NO. C 07-2888 MJJ

1

DARIO de GHETALDI (126782)

JERRY E. NASTARI (151756)

AMANDA L. RIDDLE (215221)

COREY, LUZAICH, PLISKA, DE GHETALDI & NASTARI LLP

700 El Camino Real

P.O. Box 669

Millbrae, CA 94030

Telephone: (650) 871-5666

Facsimile: (650) 871-4144

COLLEEN DUFFY SMITH (161163)

MICHAEL G. REEDY (161002)

McMANIS FAULKNER & MORGAN

A Professional Corporation

50 West San Fernando Street, 10th Floor

San Jose, California 95113

Telephone: (408) 279-8700

Facsimile: (408) 279-3244

Plaintiffs' Co-Counsel

[Other Counsel on Signature Page]

PETER D. KEISLER

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

SHEILA M. LIEBER

PETER ROBBINS

U.S. Department of Justice

20 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Room 7142

Washington, DC 20530

Telephone: (202) 514-3953

Facsimile: (202) 616-8470

Attorneys for Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

vs. 

MICHAEL O. LEAVITT,

Defendant.

Case No. C 07-2888 MJJ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMITS 

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS

Case 3:07-cv-02888-JSW Document 43 Filed 11/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PAGE LIMITS CASE NO. C 07-2888 MJJ

2

STIPULATION

With regard to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, due on 

November 20, 2007, and Defendant’s Reply, due on December 28, 2007;

The parties in the above-captioned action hereby stipulate to the following:

The page limit for Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be forty 

(40) pages and the page limit for Defendant’s Reply shall be thirty (30) pages.

Counsel respectfully request that the Court ender an order in conformity with this 

stipulation.

Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: November 16, 2007 MCMANIS FAULKNER & MORGAN

/S/

COLLEEN DUFFY SMITH

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: November 16, 2007

/S/

PETER ROBBINS

Department of Justice

Attorneys for Defendant

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Martin J. Jenkins

11/27/07

Case 3:07-cv-02888-JSW Document 43 Filed 11/28/07 Page 2 of 2