Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00548/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00548-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONNY E. MAXWELL, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

M.C. KRAMER, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:07-cv-00548 OWW-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 15)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 13)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 25, 2008, Petitioner filed an amended petition. (Doc. 13). 

 On January 31, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed Findings and

Recommendations recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED because

the petition was not filed within the one-year limitations period provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). 

(Doc. 15). The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections were to be filed within twenty days from the date of service of that order. On

February 25, 2008, Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and

Recommendations. (Doc. 16). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the

Case 1:07-cv-00548-OWW -DLB Document 17 Filed 03/14/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 31, 2008 (Doc. 15), are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 13) is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00548-OWW -DLB Document 17 Filed 03/14/08 Page 2 of 2