Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-05997/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-05997-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC LEE HACKETT, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, )

Parole Officer, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

CV F 01 5997 REC SMS HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

[Doc. #84]

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on remand from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 

On July 13, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition be DENIED with prejudice and the Clerk of Court be DIRECTED to enter

judgment. The Magistrate Judge further recommended that all pending motions be DENIED. The

Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections

were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. 

On July 28, 2005, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:01-cv-05997-REC -SMS Document 90 Filed 08/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file and having considered the

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is

supported by the record and proper analysis, and there is no need to modify the Findings and

Recommendations based on the points raised in the objections. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued July 13, 2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE;

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:01-cv-05997-REC -SMS Document 90 Filed 08/05/05 Page 2 of 2