Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02138/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02138-48/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

ATMEL CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation; ATMEL SWITZERLAND, a 

corporation; ATMEL FRANCE, a corporation; 

and ATMEL SARL, a corporation, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AUTHENTEC, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. C 06-02138 CW (EDL) 

and (related action) 

STATUS REPORT, STIPULATION 

EXTENDING TIME AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME 

Case 4:06-cv-02138-CW Document 623 Filed 09/10/08 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1

On July 14, 2008, the parties to the above-captioned matters informed this Court that they 

had reached a settlement in principle. On July 29, 2008, this Court entered an Order setting a thirtyfive (35) day deadline to finalize the settlement. The parties have been working toward finalizing 

the settlement. The parties’ current understanding is that only minor details remain to be resolved, 

and it is anticipated that a settlement agreement will be executed shortly. The settlement agreement 

provides that a final stipulated dismissal would be filed with the Court three (3) business days after a 

certain event occurring up to ten (10) business days after execution of the agreement. In view of the 

foregoing, the parties agree that the thirty-five day (35) period set in the July 29, 2008 Order should 

be extended to accommodate final resolution of the remaining issues and extended to include the 

thirteen-business-day contingency period set forth in the settlement agreement. Therefore, it is 

hereby stipulated and agreed between the parties: 

1. That the thirty-five day time period set forth in paragraph 2 of the Court's July 29, 2008 

Order shall be extended by fifteen (15) business days from the date of this Stipulation. 

STIPULATED AND AGREED. 

DATED: September 2, 2008 By: s/ Edward G. Poplawski 

 Edward G. Poplawski 

Denise L. McKenzie 

Olivia M. Kim 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 

Los Angeles, California 90013-1010 

Telephone: (213) 896-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Atmel Corporation; 

Atmel Switzerland; 

Atmel France; and 

Atmel SARL 

Case 4:06-cv-02138-CW Document 623 Filed 09/10/08 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2

DATED: September 2, 2008 By: s/ Denise M. De Mory 

 Henry C. Bunsow 

Denise De Mory 

Brian A.E. Smith 

HOWREY LLP 

525 Market Street, Suite 3600 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 848-4900 

Facsimile: (415) 848-4999 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AuthenTec, Inc. 

Case 4:06-cv-02138-CW Document 623 Filed 09/10/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 9/10/08 

DATED: ______________________________ ______________________________ 

 United States District Judge 

Case 4:06-cv-02138-CW Document 623 Filed 09/10/08 Page 4 of 4