Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01015/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01015-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUILLERMO CHAVEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

GRANADOZ, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:11-cv-1015 WBS CKD P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On February 2, 2015, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff 

was granted five extensions of time to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the 

motion, and was repeatedly informed that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that 

this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (ECF Nos. 70, 72, 73, 75, and 77.) The 

time for filing an opposition or statement of non-opposition has expired.

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 

dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

Case 2:11-cv-01015-WBS-CKD Document 78 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: August 25, 2015

1

chav1015.frs

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:11-cv-01015-WBS-CKD Document 78 Filed 08/25/15 Page 2 of 2