Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00137/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00137-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On January 9, 2014, Defendants Officer Steve Schmitz and the City of Hanford (collectively 

“Defendants”) moved to stay execution of the Court’s December 2, 2013 judgment and posted a check 

in the amount of $581,250 as security. In response, the Court noted that Defendants’ submission did 

not appear to be in full compliance with Local Rule 151. The Court therefore ordered Defendants to 

correct these deficiencies. 

On January 16, 2014, Defendants filed an “Amended Agreement for Distribution of Security,” 

which appears to be in full compliance with Local Rule 151. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 62(d), the Court APPROVES Defendants’ security in lieu of a supersedeas bond and 

orders a STAY of any execution of the December 2, 2013 judgment until this Court has resolved the 

pending motion for new trial and, if necessary, any appeal filed by Defendants has been resolved.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ISAAC MILLER, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

HANFORD POLICE OFFICER STEVE 

SCHMITZ, et al.,

Defendants.

/

Case No. 1:12-cv-0137 LJO SAB

ORDER APPROVING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO APPROVE ITS SECURITY 

AND TO STAY EXECUTION OF 

JUDGMENT

(Docs. 150 & 151)

Case 1:12-cv-00137-LJO-SAB Document 152 Filed 01/17/14 Page 1 of 1