Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04599/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-04599-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MTN TO DISMISS

AND MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C-07-4599 MHP

sf-2442113

JAMES R. McGUIRE (CA SBN 189275)

JMcGuire@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415-268-7000

Facsimile: 415-268-7522

MELISSA JONES (CA SBN 205576)

MJones@mofo.com

MORRISON @ FOERSTER LLP

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2600

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: 916-448-3200

Facsimile: 916-448-3222 

Attorneys for Defendants

CAPITAL ONE BANK and 

CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID J. LEE, an individual and, On Behalf of 

All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiffs, v.

CAPITAL ONE BANK, CAPITAL ONE 

SERVICES, INC. And DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. C-07-4599 MHP

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING 

DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

TO DISMISS TO MARCH 3, 2008 AT 

2:00 P.M. AND MODIFYING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Hon. Marilyn H. Patel

Complaint filed: Sept. 5, 2007

Case 3:07-cv-04599-MHP Document 28 Filed 01/11/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MTN TO DISMISS

AND MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C-074599 MHP

1

sf-2442113

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-7(b) Defendants Capital One Bank and Capital 

One Services, Inc. (“Defendants”) and Plaintiff David Lee hereby stipulate to continue the 

hearing date on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss scheduled for January 28, 2008, to March 3, 2008 

at 2:00 p.m. and to modify the briefing schedule for the Opposition and Reply briefs.

WHEREAS, on December 21, 2007, Defendants filed a Notice of Continuance of 

Hearing, moving the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss from January 14, 2008 to January 28, 

2008;

WHEREAS, due to a miscalculation of the deadlines, Plaintiff failed to file the Opposition 

to the Motion to Dismiss by January 7, 2008, as required by the Local Rules, and has not yet filed 

the Opposition;

WHEREAS, Defendants will suffer prejudice if they are required to file a Reply by 

January 14, 2008 (the deadline for a January 28, 2008 hearing) given that Defendants have not yet 

received the Opposition from Plaintiff; 

WHEREAS, the next date on which the parties are available for a hearing on the Motion 

to Dismiss (on dates that the Court has availability for a hearing) is March 3, 2008; 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that to remedy the filing error in a manner fair to both 

parties, Plaintiff will file the Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by January 28, 2008 and 

Defendants will file a Reply by February 15, 2008; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval and order of the 

Court, that the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss will be held on March 3, 2008 at 2:00 

p.m., Plaintiff’s Opposition will be due on January 28, 2008, and Defendants’ Reply will be due 

on February 15, 2008. 

Case 3:07-cv-04599-MHP Document 28 Filed 01/11/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MTN TO DISMISS

AND MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C-074599 MHP

2

sf-2442113

Dated: January 10, 2008 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ James R. McGuire

James R. McGuire

Attorneys for Defendants

CAPITAL ONE BANK and 

CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, INC.

Dated: January 10, 2008 HALE & ASSOCIATES

By: /s/ [INSERT]

Matthew S. Hale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DAVID J. LEE

I, James R. McGuire, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation To Extend Time To Respond To Complaint. I hereby attest that Matthew S. Hale has 

concurred in this filing.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated:

By: 

The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

United States District Judge

January 11, 2008

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:07-cv-04599-MHP Document 28 Filed 01/11/08 Page 3 of 3