Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

5:13-cv-00228-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO EXTEND NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADIL HIRAMANEK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

L. MICHAEL CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:13-cv-00228-RMW 

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO 

EXTEND NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY 

CUT-OFF DATE

Re: Dkt. No. 328

On October 21, 2015, defendants Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara and 

Beth Miller filed a motion to extend the non-expert discovery cutoff date in this matter. Dkt. No. 

328. Plaintiff Adil Hiramanek filed a notice of intent to oppose. Dkt. No. 329. Under Civil Local 

Rule 6-3(b), plaintiff’s opposition to a motion to change time would be due on Monday, October 

26, 2015. The court extends this deadline by one day. Upon receipt of plaintiffs’ opposition (not to 

exceed five pages), or at the close of business on October 27, 2015, whichever comes first, the 

court will deem this matter submitted on the papers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 23, 2015

______________________________________

Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-00228-JD Document 338 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 1