Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00990/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00990-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

19000/0119/832509.2 Case No. 1:10-cv-990-OWW-JLT

 ORDER

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION 

MATTHEW ARVIZU,

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC FKA GMAC 

MORTGAGE CORPORATION; 

GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, 

INC.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; ETS 

SERVICES, LLC; EXECUTIVE TRUSTEE 

SERVICES; CONNIE R. MELVIN d/b/a 

ACTION LEGAL SUPPROT SERVICE; 

MERRITT LAW, INC.; and Does 1 to 200, 

inclusive, 

 . 

Case No.: 1:10-cv-990-OWW-JLT

 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER

TO SHOW CAUSE RE: INJUNCTION 

Date: Monday, August 2, 2010 

Time: 4:00 PM 

Dept: Courtroom 3, 7th floor 

Judge: Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 

Plaintiff Matthew Arvizu’s (“Plaintiff’s”) ex parte Emergency Application for Temporary 

Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Re Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 18), filed on 

July 29, 2010 (“Application”), came on for hearing on August 2, 2010 in this Department before 

the Hon. Oliver W. Wanger. 

Francisco Aldana of The Advocates’ Law Firm, LLP appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. 

Alex Sears of Severson & Werson appeared on behalf of defendants GMAC Mortgage, LLC, 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:10-cv-00990-OWW -JLT Document 34 Filed 08/23/10 Page 1 of 2
19000/0119/832509.2 Case No. 1:10-cv-990-OWW-JLT

 ORDER

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc, and Executive Trustee Services, LLC (incorrectly 

sued as “ETS Services, LLC” and “Executive Trustee Services”). Chetna Vora of Archer Norris 

appeared on behalf of defendant Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. 

After considering the moving and opposition papers, as well as oral argument, and good 

cause appearing, the Court ruled as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that because Plaintiff has not adequately demonstrated a 

likelihood of success on the merits, that Plaintiff’s Application for temporary restraining order is 

DENIED. 

The denial of Plaintiff’s Application for temporary restraining order is WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE to Plaintiff bringing a motion for a preliminary injunction, seeking the same relief 

as was sought in the Application, on a regular noticed motion schedule. 

DATED:__August 20, 2010_ _/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER____________ 

 Hon. Oliver W. Wanger 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:10-cv-00990-OWW -JLT Document 34 Filed 08/23/10 Page 2 of 2