Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01589/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01589-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Berrinda Arredondo, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Fieldstone Mortgage Company, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 04-1589-PHX-ROS

ORDER

Defendant has filed two Motions to Exceed Page Limit (Doc. #360, #395) relating to

its Motion for Sanctions (Doc. #359) and the Reply in Support of Motion for Sanctions (Doc.

#396). Defendant explains in its motions that additional pages were needed to fully explain

the circumstances surrounding numerous alleged discovery violations by Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs

have not objected to Defendant's request. The court finds that Defendant's request is

reasonable in light of the number of alleged discovery violations and the motions to exceed

the page limit will be granted.

In addition, Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to

Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. #382). Plaintiffs explain that the response was

originally due on June 16, 2006 and that they were requesting a four day extension until June

20, 2006. Plaintiffs then filed their Response to Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. #388) on

June 20, as they indicated they would. Defendant has not objected to the request for an

extension. Plaintiffs' request is reasonable and their motion presents reasons establishing

good cause for the extension. Accordingly, the motion will be granted.

Case 2:04-cv-01589-ROS Document 404 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That Defendant's two Motions to Exceed Page Limit (Doc. #360, #395) and Plaintiffs'

Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc.

#382) are granted.

DATED this 10th day of July, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-01589-ROS Document 404 Filed 07/10/06 Page 2 of 2