Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01097/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01097-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH DUANE ARLINE, JR., 1:07-cv-01097-LJO-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

vs. (Doc. 42)

WARDEN KEN CLARK, ORDER FOR THIS ACTION TO PROCEED

ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS BASED ONLY

ON TWO SPECIFIC INSTANCES OF

MODIFIED PROGRAMMING, AND 

Defendant. DISMISSING ALL OTHER CLAIMS 

_____________________________/

 Kenneth Duane Arline, Jr. (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 

 On April 9, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

this action proceed against defendant Warden Ken Clark for inadequate outdoor exercise under the

Eighth Amendment, only with regard to two specific instances of modified programming, one

beginning on August 15, 2006, and the other beginning on October 20, 2006, and that all other

claims be dismissed. (Doc. 42.) On April 20, 2010, plaintiff filed a notice of non-opposition to the

findings and recommendations. (Doc. 44.) 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-

305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

1

Case 1:07-cv-01097-LJO-GBC Document 48 Filed 06/02/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 9,

2010, are adopted in full; and

2. This action now proceeds against defendant Warden Ken Clark for inadequate

outdoor exercise under the Eighth Amendment, only with regard to two specific instances of

modified programming, one beginning on August 15, 2006, and the other beginning on October 20,

2006, and all other claims are dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 1, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:07-cv-01097-LJO-GBC Document 48 Filed 06/02/10 Page 2 of 2