Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-3_06-cv-03055/USCOURTS-arwd-3_06-cv-03055-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

AO72A

(Rev. 8/82)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

HARRISON DIVISION

DEAN F. O’NEIL PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-3055 

STATE OF ARKANSAS;

COUNTY OF BOONE; and

GORDON WEBB, Boone

County Prosecuting Attorney DEFENDANTS

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dean F. O’Neil filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September

5, 2006. The complaint was provisionally filed prior to a determination regarding O’Neil’s status as

a pauper (Doc. 2). O’Neil was provided with an in forma pauperis (IFP) application for completion

(Doc. 2). O’Neil was directed to complete and return the IFP application by October 2, 2006 (Doc.

2). 

O’Neil has not responded to the court’s order. The court’s order was not returned as

undeliverable. O’Neil has not sought an extension of time to complete the IFP application, submitted

the filing fee to the court, or otherwise communicated with the court regarding the order.

I therefore recommend O’Neil’s complaint be dismissed on the grounds he has failed to obey

an order of this court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). O’Neil has ten days from receipt of the report

and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The

failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact.

O’Neil is reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by

the district court.

Dated this 13th day of November 2006.

/s/ Beverly Stites Jones 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

Case 3:06-cv-03055-JLH Document 4 Filed 11/13/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>