Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02774/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-02774-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 07-CV-2774 (JF)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

David J. Miclean (CSB# 115098/miclean@fr.com)

Christina D. Jordan (CSB# 245944/cjordan@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

500 Arguello St., Suite 500

Redwood City, CA 94063

Telephone: (650) 839-5070

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071

Attorneys for Defendants

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK OF

AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND

OPERATIONS, INC.

Robert A. Spanner, Esq. (CSB# 60308/ras@techtriallaw.com)

TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

A Professional Corporation

545 Middlefield Road, Suite 220

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 324-2223

Facsimile: (650) 324-0178

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN JOSE DIVISION)

IP SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a National

Banking Association Member; BANK OF

AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND

OPERATIONS, INC., a Delaware

corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. 07-CV-2774 (JF)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING INITIAL CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

**E-filed 8/27/07** ---------------

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 17 Filed 08/27/07 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 07-CV-2774 (JF)

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO THE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES, AND TO THE PARTIES’ ATTORNEYS OF

RECORD:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, IP SOLUTIONS,

INC. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK OF AMERICA

TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONS, INC. (“Defendants”) that the Case Management

Conference be continued by two (2) months from its originally-scheduled date of August 29, 2007,

up to and until October 29, 2007, or to a later date that is convenient for the Court.

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and

Defendants that, pursuant to this Stipulation continuing the Case Management Conference, the case

schedule dates be modified as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto.

Plaintiff and Defendants desire to pursue settlement opportunities in this matter and require

additional time in which to organize, schedule, and conduct mediation efforts. In particular,

Plaintiff and Defendants are currently discussing the possibility of using the services of JAMS to

facilitate mediation. The parties are investigating the availability of local JAMS mediators for the

month of September, and have already identified at least two individuals with availability in that

timeframe. This Stipulation is therefore requested for good cause, namely, for the purposes of

pursuing opportunities for settlement, and is not entered into for purposes of delay.

The parties previously stipulated that Defendants be granted an additional fifteen (15) days

in which to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to July 27, 2007. The parties further stipulated that

Defendants be granted an additional four (4) days in which to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up

to July 31, 2007.

By entering into this stipulation, neither Plaintiff nor Defendants waive any rights, claims or

defenses they may have in this action.

This Stipulation may be executed in counterparts and by facsimile signature, each of which,

when executed, shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same

stipulation. This Stipulation contains the entire agreement among the parties. The undersigned

hereby consent to the terms set forth in the foregoing Stipulation.

/ / /

26---

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 17 Filed 08/27/07 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 07-CV-2774 (JF)

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

Dated: August 3, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Christina D. Jordan

Christina D. Jordan

Attorneys for Defendants

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK OF

AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND

OPERATIONS, INC.

Dated: August 3, 2007 TRIAL AND TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP

By: /s/ Robert A. Spanner

Robert A. Spanner

Attorney for Plaintiff

IP SOLUTIONS, INC.

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty

of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Robert A.

Spanner.

Dated: August 3, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Christina D. Jordan

Christina D. Jordan

Attorneys for Defendants

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BANK OF

AMERICA TECHNOLOGY AND

OPERATIONS, INC.

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 17 Filed 08/27/07 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 07-CV-2774 (JF)

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________,2007 _______________________________________

HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL

JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Stip and Prop Order Continuing CMC.doc

The Case Management Conference is continued to 10/26/07 at 10:30. 8/27

Case 5:07-cv-02774-JF Document 17 Filed 08/27/07 Page 4 of 4