Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03747/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-03747-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26:7422 IRS: Refund Taxes

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IAN D. HUGHES,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 06-3747 PVT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE

ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT 

This action was filed on June 13, 2006.1 On August 4, 2006 the parties filed a stipulation

extending to September 12, 2006 the deadline for Defendant to file an answer to the complaint. It

has come to the court’s attention that Defendant never filed an answer. Thus, based on the file

herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than December 15, 2006, Defendant shall file a

brief and supporting declaration(s) showing cause why Defendant should not be entered against

Defendant. However, if by December 8, 2006 Defendant cure its error by filing an answer nunc pro

tunc that complies with Rules 8, then this order will be dissolved by the court. 

Dated: 11/20/06

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:06-cv-03747-PVT Document 11 Filed 11/20/06 Page 1 of 1