Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923-60/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C-04-03923 MMC

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) – griley@omm.com

MARK E. MILLER (S.B. #130200) – markmiller@omm.com

PETER OBSTLER (S.B. #171623) – pobstler@omm.com

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO (S.B. #208606) – ccatalano@omm.com

LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) – lsimmons@omm.com 

NORA M. PUCKETT (pro hac vice) – npuckett@omm.com

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, 

INC., a Delaware Corporation, AND 

LUKAS VAN GINNEKEN, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C04-03923 MMC (JCS) 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5 

CERTAIN DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN 

SUPPORT OF MAGMA DESIGN 

AUTOMATION, INC.’S FURTHER 

REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT 

OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AS TO THE SECOND 

THROUGH SIXTH CAUSES OF ACTION 

IN PLAINTIFF SYNOPSYS, INC.’S THIRD 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Magma Design Automation, Inc. (“Magma”) hereby moves pursuant to Civil Local Rule 

79-5 for leave to file under seal portions of Magma Design Automation, Inc.’s Further Reply 

Memorandum in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Second Through Sixth 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 965 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C-04-03923 MMC

Causes of Action in Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s Third Amended Complaint (“Magma’s Further 

Reply”) and the entirety of Exhibits 1-3, 5-8, 16, 17, 19, and 20 to the Declaration of Nora M. 

Puckett (“Puckett Declaration”) in Support of Magma’s Further Reply. This Motion for Leave to 

File Under Seal is supported by the Declaration of Nora M. Puckett submitted herewith. 

Magma’s Further Reply relies in part on testimony and documents that contain 

confidential business or trade secret information of Magma, Synopsys, and/or IBM and/or have 

been designated as Confidential or Attorneys and Consultants Only under the Stipulated 

Protective Order. Pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order, Magma seeks to file the following 

documents and testimony under seal: 

1. Portions of Magma’s Further Reply contain Magma’s, Synopsys’s, and/or IBM’s 

confidential business or trade secret information and are properly sealable. 

2. Exhibits 16 and 17 to the Puckett Declaration are documents produced by 

Synopsys in this action and designated by Synopsys as Attorneys and Consultants Only under the 

Stipulated Protective Order because they contain confidential business and trade secret 

information of Synopsys and are properly sealable. 

3. Exhibits 2, 3, 6, 7, and 20 to the Puckett Declaration are excerpts of the transcripts 

of the depositions of Antun Domic, Raul Camposano, Synopsys (30(b)(6) deposition), Aart de 

Geus, and Erik Olson, respectively, taken in this action and designated by Synopsys as Attorneys 

and Consultants Only under the Stipulated Protective Order because they contain confidential 

business or trade secret information of Magma, Synopsys, and/or IBM and are properly sealable. 

4. Exhibits 1, 5, 8, and 19 to the Puckett Declaration are excerpts of the transcripts of 

the depositions of Joe Hutt, Karen Vahtra, Rajeev Madhavan, and Steven Cline, respectively, 

taken in this action and designated by Magma as Attorneys and Consultants Only under the 

Stipulated Protective Order because they contain confidential business or trade secret information 

of Magma, Synopsys, and/or IBM and are properly sealable. 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 965 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 3 - 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C-04-03923 MMC

 Accordingly, this motion is made on the grounds that portions of Magma’s Further Reply 

and the entirety of Exhibits 1-3, 5-8, 16, 17, 19, and 20 to the Puckett Declaration contain 

confidential business or trade secret information of Magma, Synopsys, and/or IBM and are 

properly sealable. 

Dated: January 13, 2006 GEORGE A. RILEY 

PETER OBSTLER 

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO 

LUANN L. SIMMONS 

NORA M. PUCKETT 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ Nora M. Puckett 

Nora M. Puckett 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 965 Filed 01/26/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 4 - 

MAGMA’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

C-04-03923 MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Having considered Magma Design Automation, Inc.’s Administrative Motion for Leave to 

File Under Seal Certain Documents Submitted In Support of Magma Design Automation, Inc.’s 

Further Reply Memorandum in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Second 

Through Sixth Causes of Action in Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s Third Amended Complaint 

(“Magma’s Further Reply”), and all other supporting and opposing arguments and papers, and 

finding good cause, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, Magma’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File 

Under Seal 

portions of Magma Design Automation, Inc.’s Further Reply Memorandum in Support of 

Its Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Second Through Sixth Causes of Action in Plaintiff 

Synopsys, Inc.’s Third Amended Complaint; and 

the entirety of Exhibits Exhibits 1-3, 5-8, 16, 17, 19, and 20 to the Declaration of Nora M. 

Puckett in support of Magma Design Automation, Inc.’s Further Reply Memorandum in Support 

of Its Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Second Through Sixth Causes of Action in 

Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.’s Third Amended Complaint 

is GRANTED, and the aforementioned portions and exhibits will be filed under seal. 

Dated: 

 ________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SF1:614497.1 

January 25, 2006

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 965 Filed 01/26/06 Page 4 of 4