Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01129/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01129-38/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:53(b) - Prelim &amp; Perm Inj Relief &amp; other Equitable Relief

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

DIRECTV, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-01129-HSG 

ORDER TO FILE JOINTLY 

PREPARED CHART REGARDING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO 

FILE UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. Nos. 177, 184, 187-88, 190-91, 193-

95, 197, 199

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and DIRECTV have fully briefed the FTC’s 

motion for partial summary judgment, which is currently pending before the Court. See Dkt. No. 

176 (original motion); Dkt. No. 183 (corrected motion); Dkt. No. 189 (opposition to motion); Dkt. 

No. 196 (reply). The parties have filed administrative motions (including a supplemental 

administrative motion) seeking sealing of these briefs and attached exhibits, as well as corrections 

and oppositions to the administrative motions. See Dkt. Nos. 177, 184, 187-88, 190-91, 193-95, 

197 & 199. This slew of filings has resulted in a muddy record of exactly what each party is 

seeking to seal, what sealing each party opposes, and the bases for each party’s positions.

The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file, no later than Tuesday, November 22, 2016,

at 5:00pm, a jointly prepared chart that succinctly summarizes the documents sought to be sealed 

and the positions of the parties as to each. Specifically, each row of the chart should list the 

following information: (1) document sought to be sealed (e.g., “Opposition”); (2) docket number

of redacted version of the document; (3) docket number of unredacted version of document; (4)

pin citation of portion of document that is sought to be sealed (e.g., “7:15-8:5”); (5) party seeking 

sealing (e.g., “DIRECTV”); (6) asserted grounds for sealing (e.g., “Divulges DIRECTV’s trade 

secrets.”); (7) party opposing sealing (e.g., “FTC”); and, (8) asserted grounds for opposition (e.g., 

Case 4:15-cv-01129-HSG Document 208 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

“DIRECTV previously disclosed this information to the public.”). Each of the numbered 

categories above should be a separate column of the chart. If the parties seek to seal multiple 

portions of the same document, each portion should be listed as a separate row in the chart. And 

as illustrated by the examples above, the asserted grounds for sealing or opposition should be 

expressed in a concise sentence.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cv-01129-HSG Document 208 Filed 11/18/16 Page 2 of 2