Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-02506-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 PARTIES’ STIPULATION REGARDING THE USE OF

STATE COURT DISCOVERY IN THE FEDERAL

COURT ACTION C-99-2506-SI

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (#060359)

ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com

Caroline N. Mitchell (#143124)

cnmitchell@jonesday.com

JONES DAY

555 California Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 626-3939

Facsimile: (415) 875-5700

Attorneys for Defendants

CHEVRON CORPORATION and CHEVRON

INVESTMENTS INC.

Marco Simons

marco@earthrights.org

EARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL

1612 K Street NW, Suite 401

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: (202) 466-5188

Facsimile: (202) 466-5189

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY BOWOTO, et. al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION, et

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C-99-2506-SI

PARTIES’ STIPULATION REGARDING THE

USE OF STATE COURT DISCOVERY IN THE

FEDERAL COURT ACTION

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 742-1 Filed 11/09/2005 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 755 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 PARTIES’ STIPULATION REGARDING THE USE OF

STATE COURT DISCOVERY IN THE FEDERAL

COURT ACTION C-99-2506-SI

THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

All responses to interrogatories and requests for admission made, all documents produced

and all depositions taken in the state court action, Larry Bowoto, et al., v. ChevronTexaco

Corporation, et al., CGC-03-417580 (County of San Francisco), by the parties to the federal court

action, Larry Bowoto, et al., v. ChevronTexaco Corporation, et al., C-99-2506-SI (N.D. Cal.),

may be used in the federal court action to the same extent as if the state discovery had been

propounded and responded to in the federal court action; EXCEPT THAT defendants reserve the

right to object to the use in the federal court action of any discovery obtained in the state court

action after the discovery cut-off date in the federal court action.

DATED: November 9, 2005 JONES DAY

By: s//Caroline N. Mitchell 

Caroline N. Mitchell

Attorneys for Defendants

DATED: November __, 2005 EARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL

By: 

Marco Simons

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November __, 2005

By: 

The Hon. Susan Illston

United States District Court Judge

SFI-531547v1

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 742-1 Filed 11/09/2005 Page 2 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Susan Illston

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI Document 755 Filed 11/14/05 Page 2 of 2