Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03558/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-03558-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

MELINDA L. HAAG, CSBN 132612

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

DANIEL P. TALBERT, SBN OH 0084088

Special Assistant United States Attorney

333 Market Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8926

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: Daniel.Talbert@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROLYN JOY WHEELER, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-03558-SBA

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

) FOR A FIRST EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) TO FILE ANSWER AND CERTIFIED

Commissioner of Social Security, ) ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

Defendant. )

______________________________)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective

counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to file an Answer

to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and the certified administrative record. Counsel for Defendant has been

informed that the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) has not prepared a

certified administrative record for this case because the recording of Plaintiff’s hearing is partially

or totally blank, which prevents ODAR from preparing the hearing transcript and certifying an

administrative transcript for Defendant to file with this Court. Counsel for Plaintiff is attempting

to determine whether he has a usable recording of the hearing. Should Plaintiff’s counsel be

unable to locate such a recording, or should ODAR continue to be unable to prepare a certified

administrative record in any event, Defendant will move for remand pursuant to sentence six of

42 U.S.C. section 405(g) for further administrative proceedings.

The current due date for Defendant’s Answer was August 16, 2010. The new due date

Case 4:09-cv-03558-SBA Document 7 Filed 08/25/10 Page 1 of 2 Case4:09-cv-03558-SBA Document6 Filed08/19/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

will be September 15, 2010. On or before that date, Defendant will either file an answer, move

for remand pursuant to sentence six, or if necessary seek a further extension from this Court. 

Counsel for Defendant sincerely apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by

Defendant’s failing to file the answer in a timely fashion.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: August 19, 2010 /s/ James Hunt Miller 

(as authorized via e-mail)

JAMES HUNT MILLER

Attorney for Plaintiff

MELINDA L. HAAG 

United States Attorney

Dated: August 19, 2010 By s/ Daniel P. Talbert

DANIEL P. TALBERT

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:

DATED:________________________ _________________________________

SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG

UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:09-cv-03558-SBA Document 7 Filed 08/25/10 Page 2 of 2 Case4:09-cv-03558-SBA Document6 Filed08/19/10 Page2 of 2