Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05573/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05573-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 140
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESBEIDY SAUCEDO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

FIRST FRANKLIN LOAN SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-5573 SI

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

LACK OF JURISDICTION

This case was filed on November 24, 2009, and the complaint alleged federal and state law

claims. On March 1, 2010, plaintiff filed an amended complaint alleging solely state law claims against

numerous defendants, at least some of whom appear to be California residents. As such, it appears from

the face of the complaint that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this case. 

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not

be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If any party contends that this Court has jurisdiction over this case,

that party shall file a statement no later than March 12, 2010 asserting the grounds for jurisdiction. At

that time, the Court will either dismiss the case or issue a scheduling order. The March 19, 2010 hearing

and case management conference are VACATED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 1, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-05573-SI Document 20 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 1