Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02496/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02496-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD CRAWFORD,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2496 JAM EFB PS

vs.

MR. PARSON, MR. GLEASON, and 

WELLS FARGO BANK,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the

undersigned under Local Rule 72-302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 7,

2008, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. The order explained the

complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint correcting those

deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

The thirty-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the order.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule

Case 2:07-cv-02496-JAM-EFB Document 11 Filed 05/28/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

11-110. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 28, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02496-JAM-EFB Document 11 Filed 05/28/08 Page 2 of 2