Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04220/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04220-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 1 of 3

MACK WOODFOX v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al. USDC, Northern District, Case No. 3:05-CV-04220-VRW

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME TO NOTICE HEARING

LAW OFFICES OF MARK E. MERIN

Mark E. Merin, SBN. 043849

Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild, SBN. 192086

2001 P Street, Suite 100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 443-6911

Facsimile: (916) 447-8336

SCOT CANDELL, SBN 173261

ROSALIND H. MANSON, SBN 188473

Attorneys at Law

2019 Webster Street

San Francisco, CA 94115

Telephone: (415) 441-1776

Facsimile: (415) 441-1789

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MACK WOODFOX

—o0o—

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

—o0o—

MACK WOODFOX,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF

MICHAEL HENNESSEY, DEPUTY

MIGUEL PRADO,

Defendants.

CASE NO: 3:05-CV-04220 VRW

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

SHORTEN NOTICE OF HEARING ON

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT

DATE: September 21, 2006

TIME: 2:00 p.m.

CTRM: 6, 17th Floor

JUDGE: Vaughn R. Walker, Chief Judge

COMPLAINT FILED: 10/18/05

TRIAL DATE: Not Set

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, by and

through their respective counsel, that notice of plaintiff’s motion to file amended complaint shall be

shortened so as to allow the motion to be heard on the same date and time as defendant’s motion for

summary judgment presently scheduled to be heard on September 21, 2006, at 2:00 p.m. in

Courtroom 6. Plaintiff’s motion shall be filed and served by ECF concurrently with the filing of this

Stipulation which shall be filed on or before August 23, 2006.

Case 3:05-cv-04220-VRW Document 47 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 2 of 3

MACK WOODFOX v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al. USDC, Northern District, Case No. 3:05-CV-04220-VRW

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME TO NOTICE HEARING

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that defendants shall file and serve by ECF

their opposition to plaintiff’s motion to file amended compliant no later than on September 7, 2006.

Immediately below the date, time and place of the hearing, the opposition papers must include the

following notation:OPPOSITION FILED ON _______________ PURSUANT TO STIPULATION

AND ORDER ISSUED ON ___________. Copies of all papers must be lodged in Courtroom 6

within 24 hours of filing.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that plaintiff shall file and serve by ECF

his reply to defendants’ opposition to his motion to file amended complaint no later than September

14, 2006. Copies of all papers must be lodged in Courtroom 6 within 24 hours of filing.

DATED: August 23, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

SCOT CANDELL and

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 

/s/ - “Scot Candell”

BY: 

Scot Candell

Attorney for Plaintiff

DATED: August 22, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

DENNIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, Chief Trial Deputy 

PETER J. KEITH

RONALD FLYNN 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN 

Deputy City Attorneys 

/s/ - “Peter J. Keith”

BY: 

Peter J. Keith, Deputy City Attorney

Attorney for Defendants

Case 3:05-cv-04220-VRW Document 47 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 3 of 3

MACK WOODFOX v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al. USDC, Northern District, Case No. 3:05-CV-04220-VRW

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME TO NOTICE HEARING

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the date by which notice of plaintiff’s motion to file

amended complaint is shortened so as to allow the motion to be heard on the same date and time as

defendants’ motion for summary judgment presently scheduled to be heard on September 21, 2006,

at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 6. Plaintiff’s motion is deemed filed and served by ECF as of the date

this Stipulation was filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall file and serve by ECF their opposition to

plaintiff’s motion to file amended compliant no later than September 7, 2006. Immediately below

the date, time and place of the hearing, the opposition papers must include the following notation:

OPPOSITION FILED ON [date] PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND ORDER ISSUED ON

___________. Copies of all papers must be lodged in Courtroom 6 within 24 hours of filing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file and serve by ECF his reply to

defendants’ opposition to his motion to file amended complaint no later than September 14, 2006.

Copies of all papers must be lodged in Courtroom 6 within 24 hours of filing.

DATED: 

 

HON. VAUGHN R. WALKER, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT

S:\WpWork\Woodfox, Mack\Pleadings\Stip & Order to Shorten Time to Notice Motion.wpd

8/28/2006

Case 3:05-cv-04220-VRW Document 47 Filed 08/28/06 Page 3 of 3