Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00262-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

COMPEL ARBITRATION

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099 

tboutrous@gibsondunn.com 

DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289 

dwongyang@gibsondunn.com 

MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308 

mmcrae@gibsondunn.com 

THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 

tevangelis@gibsondunn.com 

DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, 

SBN 254433 

dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com 

BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325 

bstoker@gibsondunn.com 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 

Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 

jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com 

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289 

kringdowell@gibsondunn.com 

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 

Telephone: 415.393.8200 

Facsimile: 415.393.8306 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN 

GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HAKAN YUCESOY, and ABDI 

MAHAMMED, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN 

GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 

ARBITRATION 

Date: July 23, 2015 

Time: 1:30 pm 

Place: Courtroom 5 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice 

ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 

Boston, MA 02116 

Telephone: (617) 994-5800 

Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 

sliss@llrlaw.com 

apagano@llr law.com 

MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242 

CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES 

100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 817-1470 

mcarlson@carlsonlegalservices.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI MAHAMMED, 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 71 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

COMPEL ARBITRATION 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan 

Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves, 

and Travis Kalanick, (“Defendants”), (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree that the hearing 

on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration currently scheduled for July 23, 2015 be moved to 

August 20, 2015, or alternatively, that the hearing be moved to July 16, 2015 and that Plaintiffs’ 

counsel be permitted to appear by telephone: 

 WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration is currently scheduled 

for July 23, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ lead counsel is scheduled to be out of the country on a long-planned 

vacation, leaving from Boston on July 17, 2015, and returning to the United States on July 31, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, the Court has a hearing scheduled on a related matter (Uber’s motion to stay in 

the cases of Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. C-14-5200 and Gillette v. Uber Technologies, 

Inc., No. C-14-5241), for July 16, 2015; 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel is not able to appear in person on July 16, 2015, in San 

Francisco but could appear by telephone; 

 WHEREAS, both sides’ counsel are already scheduled to appear before this Court on August 

20, 2015, for the Case Management Conference in this case; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that: 

(1) The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration currently scheduled for 

July 23, 2015, is either moved to July 16, 2015, provided that Plaintiffs’ counsel 

may appear by telephone, or alternatively, 

(2) The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration currently scheduled for 

July 23, 2015 is moved to August 20, 2015. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 71 Filed 06/23/15 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

COMPEL ARBITRATION 

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto. 

Dated: June 23, 2015 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN 

ADELAIDE PAGANO 

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 

MATTHEW CARLSON 

CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES 

By: /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

HAKAN YUCESOY AND ABDI MAHAMMED, 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated 

Dated: June 23, 2015 THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. 

DEBRA WONG YANG 

MARCELLUS A. MCRAE 

THEANE D. EVANGELIS 

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ 

DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA 

BRANDON J. STOKER 

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By: /s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and 

TRAVIS KALANICK

 

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 71 Filed 06/23/15 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

COMPEL ARBITRATION 

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: ____________________ 

 Hon. Edward M. Chen 

The motion hearing and 

CMC is reset for 8/6/15 at 1:30 p.m. An updated joint CMC statement shall be 

filed by 7/30/15. All parties must appear in person. 

 6/23/15 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 71 Filed 06/23/15 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC Document 71 Filed 06/23/15 Page 5 of 5