Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00760/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00760-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

1

STIP FOR EXT TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 15-cv-00760-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHATLEY KALLAS LLP

Alan M. Mansfield (SBN 125998)

amansfield@whatleykallas.com

1 Sansome Street, 35th Fl., PMB # 131

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel: (415) 860-2503

Fax: (888) 331-9633

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

L. Timothy Fisher (SBN 191626)

ltfisher@bursor.com

Julia A. Luster (SBN 295031

jluster@bursor.com

Neal J. Deckant (admitted pro hac vice)

ndeckant@bursor.com

1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Tel: (925) 300-4455

Fax: (925) 407-2700

Co-Lead Interim Class Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE: NVIDIA GTX 970 GRAPHICS 

CHIP LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ALL ACTIONS.

CASE NO.: 15-cv-00760-CRB

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED 

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND TO TAKE 

HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS OFF 

CALENDAR

Current Motion Date: September 18, 2015

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Complaint Filed: February 19, 2015

THE PARTIES HERETO STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on June 8, 2015 Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Consolidated Class Action

Complaint (Dkt. No. 67) (“Complaint”), in this consolidated action, consolidating in one Complaint the 

allegations and claims asserted in the eight actions on file in this Court;

Case 4:15-cv-00760-PJH Document 82 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 4
2

STIP FOR EXT TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 15-cv-00760-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, as stated in the parties’ Joint Case Management Conference Statement filed with 

the Court on July 10, 2015 (Dkt. No. 73), the following related actions are pending in other Districts:

Bailey v. NVIDIA Corporation, U.S.D.C., W.D. of North Carolina, Case No. 3:15-cv-00119; Chung v. 

NVIDIA Corporation, U.S.D.C. District of Maryland, Case No. 8:15-cv-00711; Giordano v. NVIDIA 

Corporation, U.S.D.C., District of Colorado, Case No. 1:15-cv-00507; Palagano v. NVIDIA 

Corporation, U.S.D.C., E.D. of Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:15-cv-01248; and Parker v. NVIDIA 

Corporation, U.S.D.C., M.D. of Georgia, Case No. 1:15-cv-00062;

WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 Defendants in this action filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6) directed at the claims asserted in the Complaint, the response to which is 

currently due on August 14, 2015, and the hearing on which is currently set for September 18, 2015;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), Plaintiffs have until August 5, 2015 as a matter 

of right to amend their Complaint based upon the filing of the Motion to Dismiss;

WHEREAS, on July 20, 2015 argument was held on Defendants’ motion to transfer venue in 

the Palagono action to this Court and was taken under submission, with a ruling to be issued after 

July 31, 2015;

WHEREAS, upon reviewing the claims made in that Motion, and in consideration of the 

pending ruling on the motion to transfer venue in the Palagono action that, if granted, would ultimately 

require Plaintiffs to amend the Complaint in this action to include both the Plaintiff and claims in that 

action, and in potentially other related actions that are transferred to this Court, the parties agree it 

would be more efficient to extend Plaintiffs’ current deadline to amend the Complaint by 

approximately six weeks rather than to expend resources responding to the Motion that would be 

mooted by amending the Complaint for the reasons set forth above;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that (1) Plaintiffs may have until 

September 14, 2015 to file a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint in this Action, and (2) the

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 4:15-cv-00760-PJH Document 82 Filed 07/31/15 Page 2 of 4
3

STIP FOR EXT TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 15-cv-00760-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

hearing on the pending Motion to Dismiss be taken off calendar pending the filing of that Complaint. 

The parties agree the Case Management Conference can remain on calendar.

DATED: July 24, 2015 WHATLEY KALLAS, LLP

By: /S/Alan M. Mansfield

ALAN M. MANSFIELD (Of Counsel) 

(SBN 125998)

amansfield@whatleykallas.com

1 Sansome Street, 35th Floor, PMB #131

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel: (415) 906-3876 / Fax: (888) 331-9633

WHATLEY KALLAS, LLP

Joe R. Whatley, Jr.

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

1180 Avenue of the Americas, 20th Floor

New York, NY 10036

Tel: (212) 447-7060 / Fax: (800) 922-4851

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

By: /S/ L. Timothy Fisher

L. Timothy Fisher (SBN 191626)

ltfisher@bursor.com

Julia A. Luster (SBN 295031

jluster@bursor.com

Neal J. Deckant (admitted pro hac vice)

ndeckant@bursor.com

1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Tel: (925) 300-4455 / Fax: (925) 407-2700

Co-Lead Interim Class Counsel

Dated: July 24, 2015 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP

By: /S/ Alexander K. Talarides

Alexander K. Talarides (SBN 268086)

atalarides@orrick.com

Robert P. Varian (SBN 107459)

rvarian@orrick.com

James N. Kramer (SBN 154709)

jkramer@orrick.com

The Orrick Building

405 Howard Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Tel: (415) 773-5700 / Fax: (415) 773-5759

Attorneys for Defendants NVIDIA Corporation and EVGA

Corporation

Case 4:15-cv-00760-PJH Document 82 Filed 07/31/15 Page 3 of 4
4

STIP FOR EXT TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 15-cv-00760-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, §X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury 

that concurrence in the filing of the within document has been obtained from each signatory.

DATED: July 24, 2015 WHATLEY KALLAS, LLP

By: /S/Alan M. Mansfield

ALAN M. MANSFIELD (Of Counsel) 

(SBN 125998)

amansfield@whatleykallas.com

1 Sansome Street, 35th Floor, PMB #131

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel: (415) 906-3876

Fax: (888) 331-9633

WHATLEY KALLAS, LLP

Joe R. Whatley, Jr.

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

1180 Avenue of the Americas, 20th Floor

New York, NY 10036

Tel: (212) 447-7060

Fax: (800) 922-4851

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs shall have until September 14, 2015 to file a Second Amended Consolidated 

Complaint in this Action.

2. The hearing on Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss, currently set for September 18, 

2015 at 10:00 a.m., is hereby ordered off calendar pending the filing of a Second Amended 

Consolidated Complaint.

DATED: July 31, 2015

HON. CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Court Judge

Case 4:15-cv-00760-PJH Document 82 Filed 07/31/15 Page 4 of 4