Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca5-16-60111/USCOURTS-ca5-16-60111-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-60111

Summary Calendar

VINSON BALLARD,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY; DOCTOR MARCUS A. CHANAY, 

Individually and in his Professional Capacity; DOCTOR LORIA BROWN, 

Individually and in her Professional Capacity; MICHAEL THOMAS, 

Individually and in his Professional Capacity; DOCTOR CAROLYN MYERS, 

Individually and in her Professional Capacity; WAYNE GOODWIN, 

Individually and in his Professional Capacity; PAMELA MITCHELL, 

Individually and in her Professional Capacity; ROBIN PACK, Individually 

and in her Professional Capacity; DOCTOR CURTIS JOHNSON, 

Individually and in his Professional Capacity; FRANCIS HORTON WHITE, 

Individually and in her Professional Capacity; ATTORNEY DAVID 

BUFORD, Individually and in his Professional Capacity,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:13-CV-672

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-60111 Document: 00513641813 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2016
No. 16-60111

2

Plaintiff-Appellant Vinson Ballard a/k/a Rev. Vinson Ballard, M.S., 

proceeding pro se on appeal after being represented by counsel in the district 

court, makes largely unintelligible complaints about the proceedings and 

results of a court supervised and approved settlement of various employment 

claims between Ballard and Jackson State University, the sole remaining 

Defendant-Appellee. We have carefully and painstakingly reviewed the record 

on appeal, including the briefs of the parties and the various rulings and orders 

of the magistrate judge and the district court from which Ballard appears to 

appeal. As a result of our review, we find no reversible error in any of the 

proceedings or rulings, and conclude that Plaintiff-Appellant Ballard has had 

all the procedural and substantive process to which he is due. The orders and 

rulings from which Ballard appeals are, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-60111 Document: 00513641813 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/17/2016