Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00329/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00329-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILILAM MACK BRYSON, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00329-KJM-SAB

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING THIS 

ACTION

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

On March 3, 2015, Plaintiff William Mack Bryson, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) filed the complaint in 

this action. Plaintiff did not paid the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis

without prepayment of the fee. Therefore, on March 5, 2015, the Court issued an order directing 

Plaintiff to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty 

days. The May 5, 2015 order advised Plaintiff that failure to pay the filing fee or submit an 

application to proceed in forma pauperis would result in dismissal of this action. More than 

thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the May 5, 

2015 order.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma 

pauperis in compliance with the March 5, 2015 order.

Case 1:15-cv-00329-KJM-SAB Document 5 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the district judge assigned to this 

action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and this Court’s Local Rule 304. Within fourteen 

(14) days of service of this recommendation, any party may file written objections to these 

findings and recommendations with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document 

should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The 

district judge will review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th 

Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00329-KJM-SAB Document 5 Filed 04/16/15 Page 2 of 2