Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01888/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01888-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Valerie Moorman, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Roosevelt Irrigation District, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 10-01888-PHX-NVW

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 31), the

Response, and the Reply. Plaintiff alleges claims for failure to promote and for

termination of employment. Defendant’s Motion makes all the necessary showings to

defeat Plaintiff’s claims on the grounds presented in the Motion. Plaintiff presents no

evidence in opposition to the Motion. 

Plaintiff’s Response lists a number of paragraphs that he does not oppose and 

summarily states that he disputes other parts of Defendant’s statement of facts. Such a

response does not meet the requirements of Local Rule 56.1(b), which requires the

adverse party to respond to each of the moving party’s assertions of fact in a separately

numbered paragraph, and more importantly, to provide “a reference to the specific

admissible portion of the record supporting the party’s position if the fact is disputed.” 

Case 2:10-cv-01888-NVW Document 35 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Plaintiff’s own Statement of Facts (Doc. 33-1) does not cite to any admissible

evidence in support of its assertions, and it does not submit any evidence or any

documentation at all. 

The Court has considered all the filings on this Motion and grants it on the

undisputed evidence, which is only the Defendant’s evidence.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

(Doc. 31) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk enter judgment in favor of Defendant

and that Plaintiff take nothing. The Clerk shall terminate this action.

DATED this 16th day of December, 2011.

Case 2:10-cv-01888-NVW Document 35 Filed 12/19/11 Page 2 of 2