Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00333/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00333-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURIE ELLEN FLANAGAN,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-07-0333 LKK GGH

vs.

BENICIA UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT, et al.,

Defendant. ORDER

__________________________________/

On May 14, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff filed objections on May 29,

2008, defendants filed a reply to plaintiff’s objections on June 9, 2008, plaintiff filed a reply and

supplemental argument on June 11, 2008, defendants filed objections to plaintiff’s reply on June

12, 2008 and June 23, 2008, and they were considered by the district judge.

This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to

which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920

(1982). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made,

Case 2:07-cv-00333-LKK -GGH Document 103 Filed 09/23/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

the court assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 14, 2008, are ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed.

DATED: September 23, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-00333-LKK -GGH Document 103 Filed 09/23/08 Page 2 of 2