Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01093/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-01093-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIE ANSON-REBONG,

Plaintiff,

 v.

EVERHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, a

Florida corporation, LOAN CENTER OF

CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED, a

California corporation, COAST CAPITAL

MORTGAGE, a business entity, form

unknown, MERSCORP, INC., a Delaware

corporation, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a

Delaware corporation, MTC FINANCIAL

INC., dba TRUSTEE CORPS, a California

Corporation, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 10-00923 WHA

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON

APPLICATION FOR TRO

On the condition that this order and plaintiff’s application for a temporary restraining

order is immediately served on defendants (along with the summons and complaint, if those

documents have not yet been served), the proposed sale of the subject residence located at

18430 Castle Ridge Drive in Morgan Hill, California is temporarily restrained pending a

hearing on FRIDAY, APRIL 23, 2010, AT 9:00 A.M. Plaintiff must ensure defendants are present

at the hearing and that immediate notice of this order was provided. If a preliminary injunction

is granted, plaintiff should be prepared to post a bond at the hearing, the amount to be

determined.

Case 3:10-cv-01093-WHA Document 8 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants may submit an opposition to this application for a temporary restraining

order BY NOON ON TUESDAY, APRIL 20. Plaintiff may reply BY NOON ON THURSDAY,

APRIL 22. At all events, plaintiff’s counsel must explain under oath by the April 22 deadline

why this application for a temporary restraining order was not requested while this matter was

pending for a month before Judge Zimmerman. Moreover, plaintiff’s counsel must explain why

they waited until the 11th hour to decline to proceed before a magistrate judge, so that the TRO

proceedings would be foreseeably and necessarily compressed. In this connection, plaintiff’s

counsel shall state specifically how long they and plaintiff knew about the April 16th

foreclosure sale date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-01093-WHA Document 8 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 2