Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00146/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00146-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 375
Nature of Suit: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31:3729 False Claims Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARLENE ERVIN, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

OMNICARE, INC.,

Defendant.

No. 2:13-cv-00146-MCE-KJN

INITIAL PRETRIAL 

SCHEDULING ORDER

This action is assigned to the Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. Pursuant to the 

provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED: 

I. SERVICE OF PROCESS

Plaintiff(s) shall complete service of process on all parties within ninety (90) days 

of the date of the filing of the second amended complaint. Concurrently with the service 

of process, or as soon thereafter as possible, plaintiff(s) shall serve upon each of the 

parties named in the second amended complaint, and upon all parties subsequently 

joined, a copy of this Order, and shall file with the Clerk of the Court a proof of service. 

Any party who impleads a third-party defendant shall serve upon that party a copy of this 

Order and shall file with the Clerk of the Court a proof of service reflecting such service. 

///

Case 2:13-cv-00146-MCE-KJN Document 48 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In the event this action was originally filed in a state court and was thereafter 

removed to this Court, the removing party shall, immediately following such removal,

serve upon each of the other parties named in the second amended complaint and upon 

all parties subsequently joined a copy of this Order. The removing party shall also file 

with the Clerk of the Court a proof of service reflecting such service.

In order to assist the Court in meeting its recusal responsibilities, any nongovernmental corporate party to this action shall file a statement identifying all its parent 

corporations and listing any publicly-held company that owns ten percent (10%) or more 

of the party’s stock. This statement shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after 

the non-governmental corporate party is served with a copy of this Order. Thereafter, if 

there is any change in the information, the party shall file and serve a supplemental 

statement within a reasonable time after such change occurs. 

II. DISCOVERY

Within sixty (60) days1 of service of the second amended complaint on any party, 

or from the date of removal, whichever is later, the parties shall meet and confer as 

required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) regarding their discovery plan. 

All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed no later 

than three hundred sixty-five (365) days from the date the federal case was opened. In 

this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all 

depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been 

resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the 

order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the 

magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the Local Rules.

2

 

///

///

 1 The parties shall refer to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) in computing the time periods 

specified in this Order.

2 A copy of the current Local Rules is available at http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/rules/localrules/

Case 2:13-cv-00146-MCE-KJN Document 48 Filed 01/12/17 Page 2 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

III. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES

All counsel are to designate in writing and serve upon all other parties the name, 

address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial not later 

than sixty (60) days after the close of discovery. The designation shall be accompanied 

by a written report prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B). 

Within thirty (30) days after the designation of expert witnesses, any party may 

designate a supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a 

subject covered by an expert designated by an adverse party. The right to designate a 

supplemental expert for rebuttal purposes only shall apply to a party who has not 

previously disclosed an expert witness on the date set for expert witness disclosure by 

this Order. 

Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all 

likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An 

expert witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the 

party offering the witness demonstrates: (a) good cause for the party’s failure to 

designate the expert witness in accordance with this Order; (b) that the Court and 

opposing counsel were promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the 

witness was promptly made available for deposition. 

For purposes of this Order, an “expert” is any person who may be used at trial to 

present evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 702, 703, and 705, which include 

both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert 

opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues 

in the case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a 

testifying expert for the purposes of litigation). 

///

///

///

Case 2:13-cv-00146-MCE-KJN Document 48 Filed 01/12/17 Page 3 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

Each party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient, retained, or 

both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the 

express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts 

must state in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such 

persons. 

All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render 

an informed opinion, and given their bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to 

give full and complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts 

will not be permitted to testify at the trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or 

opinion formed, after deposition taken subsequent to designation. 

Counsel are instructed to complete all discovery of expert witnesses in a timely 

manner in order to comply with the Court’s deadline for filing dispositive motions. 

IV. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS

The parties shall file dispositive motions no later than one hundred eighty (180) 

days after the close of non-expert discovery. All papers should be filed in conformity 

with the Local Rules. Absent leave of the Court, all issues the parties wish to resolve on 

summary judgment must be raised together in one (1) motion or cross-motion. Should 

the parties wish to file additional motions for summary judgment, they must seek leave of 

the Court. 

All purely legal issues are to be resolved in timely pretrial motions. When 

appropriate, failure to comply with Local Rules 230 and 260, as modified by this Order, 

may be deemed consent to the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion 

summarily. With respect to motions for summary judgment, failure to comply with Local 

Rules 230 and 260, as modified by this Order, may result in dismissal for failure to 

prosecute (or failure to defend) pursuant to this Court’s inherent authority to control its 

docket and or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

///

///

Case 2:13-cv-00146-MCE-KJN Document 48 Filed 01/12/17 Page 4 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

Further, failure to timely oppose a summary judgment motion3 may result in the granting 

of that motion if the movant shifts the burden to the nonmovant to demonstrate that a 

genuine issue of material fact remains for trial. 

The Court places a page limit for points and authorities (exclusive of exhibits and 

other supporting documentation) of twenty (20) pages on all initial moving papers, twenty 

(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. Sur-replies are viewed with 

disfavor and will only be considered upon a showing of good cause. All requests for 

page limit increases must be made in writing with a proposed order setting forth any and 

all reasons for any increase in page limit at least seven (7) days prior to the filing of the 

motion. 

The parties are directed to the Court’s website for available hearing dates and 

Judge England’s standard procedures. (www.caed.uscourts.gov – select “Judges” –

select “Judge England” – select “Standard Information”). 

Citations to the Supreme Court Lexis database shall include parallel citations to 

the Westlaw database. 

The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device 

designated to address the admissibility of evidence. The Court will look with disfavor 

upon dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the 

guise of motions in limine. 

The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could 

have been tendered to the Court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion 

cut-off date may constitute waiver of such issue. 

///

///

///

///

 3 The Court urges any party that contemplates bringing a motion for summary judgment or who 

must oppose a motion for summary judgment to review Local Rule 260.

Case 2:13-cv-00146-MCE-KJN Document 48 Filed 01/12/17 Page 5 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

V. TRIAL SETTING

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness not later than 

thirty (30) days after receiving this Court’s ruling(s) on the last filed dispositive motion(s). 

If the parties do not intend to file dispositive motions, the parties are ordered to file a 

Joint Notice of Trial Readiness not later than thirty (30) days after the close of the 

designation of supplemental expert witnesses and the notice must include statements of 

intent to forgo the filing of dispositive motions.

The parties are to set forth in their Notice of Trial Readiness, the appropriateness 

of special procedures, whether this case is related to any other case(s) on file in the 

Eastern District of California, the prospect for settlement, their estimated trial length, any 

request for a jury, and their availability for trial. The parties’ Notice of Trial Readiness 

Statement shall also estimate how many court days each party will require to present its 

case, including opening statements and closing arguments. Plaintiff’s estimate shall 

also include the time necessary for jury selection, and Defendant’s estimate shall include 

the time necessary to finalize jury instructions and instruct the jury. 

This Court is in session for jury selection, opening statements, presentation of 

evidence, closing arguments, finalizing proposed jury instructions and verdict forms, and 

instruction of the jury Monday through Wednesday, only. During trial days, the Court 

adheres to the following schedule:

Trial: 9:00—10:30 A.M.

Break: 10:30—10:50 A.M.

Trial: 10:50—12:00 P.M.

Lunch: 12:00—1:30 P.M.

Trial: 1:30—3:00 P.M.

Break: 3:00—3:20 P.M.

Trial: 3:20—4:30 P.M.

Jury deliberations only are Monday through Friday if necessary. 

///

Case 2:13-cv-00146-MCE-KJN Document 48 Filed 01/12/17 Page 6 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7

After review of the parties’ Joint Notice of Trial Readiness, the Court will issue an 

order that sets forth dates for a final pretrial conference and trial. 

VI. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

If the parties agree to a settlement conference, a magistrate judge will be 

randomly assigned to the case to preside over the settlement conference. If the parties 

specifically request that the assigned District Judge or Magistrate Judge conduct the 

settlement conference, the parties shall file the appropriate waiver of disqualification in 

accordance with Local Rule 270(b). If the parties elect to participate in the Voluntary 

Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP), a stipulation of election is required pursuant to 

Local Rule 271. See, Attachments 2-1 and 2-2 of this Order. 

In accordance with Local Rule 160, counsel are to immediately file a notice of 

settlement or other disposition of this case. 

VII. MODIFICATION OF INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order shall not be modified except by leave of 

court upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation 

alone to modify the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order does not constitute good cause. 

Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel will not 

constitute good cause.

VIII. COURTESY COPIES

No party shall submit paper courtesy copies of pleadings or exhibits to the Court 

unless expressly ordered to do so.

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:13-cv-00146-MCE-KJN Document 48 Filed 01/12/17 Page 7 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

8

IX. OBJECTIONS TO INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

This Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order will become final without further order of the 

Court unless objections are filed within sixty (60) days of service on all defendant(s).

Dated: January 12, 2017

Case 2:13-cv-00146-MCE-KJN Document 48 Filed 01/12/17 Page 8 of 8