Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-00338/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-00338-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGELIO MAY RUIZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL SEXTON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00338-CRB 

ORDER ADDRESSING REQUEST 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION 

TOMOTION TO DISMISS AND 

REQUEST FOR PETITIONER TO 

FILE CDCR FILE

Respondent has filed a request for an extension of time to and including November 

22, 2018. Dkt. 28. This request is unopposed. Dkt. 29. The Court hereby grants 

Respondent’s request for an enlargement of time to and including November 22, 2018, in 

which to file and serve a reply to petitioner’s opposition to the motion to dismiss the 

habeas petition.

Respondent also requests that the Petitioner serve on Respondent the 3500 pages of 

the CDCR file. Dkt. 28. In counsel’s declaration in support of this request, counsel states 

that she “cannot accurately respond to the numerous assertions petitioner makes in his 

declaration, and which counsel argues in his brief, without access to the CDCR records,”

and “therefore request[s] that this Court order petitioner to file the CDCR records with the 

Court and serve them on respondent, and direct counsel to provide citations to the CDCR 

records for each of the assertions petitioner makes in his declaration.” Dkt. 28-1.

Respondent relies on Orthel v. Yates, 2011 WL 4026808 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 12, 2011), in 

which the “parties agreed to make a copy of the[CDCR] records for respondent.” Id. at *3. 

The Court also observed that “[a]t the hearing, petitioner’s counsel pointed out that it is 

respondent’s client who has the original records in the first place.” Id. at *3 n.1. 

Case 3:17-cv-00338-CRB Document 30 Filed 10/09/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:17-cv-00338-CRB Document 30 Filed 10/09/18 Page 2 of 2