Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01830/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01830-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:206 Collect Unpaid Wages

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 14-cv-01830 NC 

ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL 

SUBMISSIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JAMAL WILLIAMS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITY OF BERKELEY, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 14-cv-01830 NC

ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL 

SUBMISSIONS ON MOTION FOR 

APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT OF 

FLSA CLAIMS 

Re: Dkt. No. 21 

Plaintiff Jamal Williams and defendant City of Berkeley move jointly for an order 

approving the settlement of plaintiff’s FLSA claims and dismissing, with prejudice, 

plaintiff’s claims against defendant. Dkt. No. 21. The motion is set for hearing on 

February 11, 2015. By January 23, 2015, the parties must file the following: 

1. A declaration supporting the factual contentions in the joint motion, and any 

supplemental briefing, such as the factual assertions made about the value of plaintiff’s 

FLSA claims. Civ. L.R. 7-5(a) (“Factual contentions made in support of or in opposition to 

any motion must be supported by an affidavit or declaration and by appropriate references 

to the record.”). 

2. An explanation of how the settlement amount is allocated between the FLSA and 

non-FLSA claims and why such allocation is a fair and reasonable resolution of the FLSA 

claims. 

Case 3:14-cv-01830-NC Document 22 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Case No

ORDER

SUBMIS

3. 

settleme

officers,

every ki

discrimi

under Fe

United S

with the

457742,

No. 10-c

 IT

D

. 14-cv-0183

R RE: SUPPL

SSIONS

 An explan

ent of FLSA

, agents, and

ind, known 

ination, repr

ederal or St

States or of

e City.” Dk

, at *3 (N.D

cv-5243 SB

T IS SO OR

ate: January

30 NC 

LEMENTAL

nation of wh

A claims tha

d employee

or unknow

risal, or any

tate statute, 

f a State, ari

kt. No. 21 at

D. Cal. Jan. 

BA, 2012 W

RDERED. 

y 13, 2015 

 

L

hy the Cour

at releases “

es, from any

wn, whether 

y other lega

City ordina

sing out of

t 8-9. See L

31, 2014); M

WL 6629608

 

 2 

rt should ap

“the City, an

y and all cla

based on to

al theory of 

ance, comm

f or in any w

Luo v. Zyng

McKeen-Ch

8, at *5 (N.D

 ____ Nath

Unit

pprove as fa

nd its divisi

aims, dema

ort, contract

f recovery, i

mon law, or

way related 

ga Inc., No. 

haplin v. Fr

D. Cal. Dec

__________ hanael M. C

ted States M

air and reas

ions, subsid

ands, and ca

t, negligenc

including w

r the Constit

to [plaintiff

13-cv-0018

ranklin Am.

c. 19, 2012)

__________ Cousins 

Magistrate J

onable a 

diaries, affil

auses of acti

ce, 

without limit

tution of th

ff’s] employ

86 NC, 201

. Mortgage 

). 

____ 

Judge 

liates, 

ion of 

tation 

e 

yment 

14 WL 

 Co., 

Case 3:14-cv-01830-NC Document 22 Filed 01/13/15 Page 2 of 2