Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02455/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02455-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT CURTISS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SN SERVICING CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:23-cv-02455-DC-SCR (PS)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 

THIS ACTION

(Doc. No. 25)

Plaintiffs Robert Curtiss and Jennifer Curtiss are proceeding pro se in this civil action. 

This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 1, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 

recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to 

Plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. (Doc. No. 25.) In 

particular, on April 30, 2024, the court issued an order directing Plaintiffs to “file a statement 

addressing whether they intend to continue to proceed in this action pro se or retain new counsel,” 

within fourteen days of being served with that order, and Plaintiffs did not do so. (Doc. No. 20.) 

As a result of Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with that order, on September 9, 2024, the court issued 

an order to Plaintiffs to show cause why this case should not be dismissed due to their failure to 

prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. (Doc. No. 23.) Plaintiffs did not respond to 

Case 2:23-cv-02455-DC-SCR Document 26 Filed 12/05/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

that order to show cause or otherwise communicate with the court. The pending findings and 

recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto 

were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Doc. No. 25 at 2.) To date, no objections 

to the findings and recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now 

passed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 1, 2024 (Doc. No. 25) are 

adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to Plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute 

this action and failure to comply with court orders; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 4, 2024 ___________________________

Dena Coggins

United States District Judge

Case 2:23-cv-02455-DC-SCR Document 26 Filed 12/05/24 Page 2 of 2