Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-02163/USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-02163-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AISHA JAMILAH TIGGS, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN,

Defendant.

No. 2:22-cv-02163-DC-SCR 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION OF 

AISHA JAMILAH TIGGS FOR 

APPOINTMENT AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM 

FOR MINOR PLAINTIFF M.T.C., JR.

(Doc. No. 24)

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Aisha Jamilah Tiggs’ application for 

appointment as guardian ad litem for minor Plaintiff M.T.C., Jr. (Doc. No. 24.) No opposition to 

the pending application has been filed. For the reasons explained below, the court will grant 

Plaintiff Aisha Jamilah Tiggs’ application. 

Under Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[a] minor or an incompetent 

person who does not have a duly appointed representative may sue by a next friend or by a

guardian ad litem.” “The court must appoint a guardian ad litem—or issue another appropriate 

order—to protect a minor or incompetent person who is unrepresented in an action.” Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 17(c)(2). A representative of a minor or incompetent person may sue or defend on behalf of the 

minor or incompetent person. Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c).

The appointment of the guardian ad litem is more than a mere formality. United States v. 

30.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Klickitat Cnty., State of Wash., 795 F.2d 796, 805 

Case 2:22-cv-02163-DC-SCR Document 28 Filed 01/02/25 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

(9th Cir. 1986). A court shall take whatever measures it deems appropriate to protect the interests 

of the individual during the litigation. Id. The guardian need not possess special qualifications, 

but he must “be truly dedicated to the best interests of the person on whose behalf he seeks to 

litigate.” AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager, 143 F. Supp. 3d 1042, 1054 (E.D. Cal. 2015) (quoting 

Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 163-64 (1990)).

In this district, Local Rule 202(a) further provides, in pertinent part:

Upon commencement of an action or upon initial appearance in 

defense of an action by or on behalf of a minor . . . the attorney 

representing the minor or incompetent person shall present . . . a 

motion for the appointment of a guardian ad litem by the Court, or

. . . a showing satisfactory to the Court that no such appointment is 

necessary to ensure adequate representation of the minor or 

incompetent person.

L.R. 202(a) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)). Local Rule 202 also requires disclosure of the 

attorney’s interest, specifically requiring the following:

When the minor or incompetent is represented by an attorney, it shall 

be disclosed to the Court by whom and the terms under which the 

attorney was employed; whether the attorney became involved in the 

application at the instance of the party against whom the causes of 

action are asserted, directly or indirectly; whether the attorney stands 

in any relationship to that party; and whether the attorney has 

received or expects to receive any compensation, from whom, and 

the amount.

L.R. 202(c).

The decision to appoint a guardian ad litem “must normally be left to the sound discretion 

of the trial court.” 30.64 Acres of Land, 795 F.2d at 804. Fit parents are presumed to act in the 

best interests of their children. Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 (2000). However, “if the 

parent has an actual or potential conflict of interest with [their] child, the parent has no right to 

control or influence the child’s litigation.” Molesky for J.M. v. Carillo, No. 1:22-cv-1567-ADACDB, 2022 WL 17584396, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2022) (quoting Williams v. Super. Ct. of San 

Diego, 147 Cal. App. 4th 36, 50 (2007)). 

The proposed guardian ad litem, Plaintiff Aisha Jamilah Tiggs, is the biological mother of 

Plaintiff M.T.C., Jr. (Doc. No. 24 at ¶ 6.) Plaintiff Aisha Jamilah Tiggs consents to act as a 

guardian ad litem for Plaintiff M.T.C., Jr. (Doc. No. 24-1.) Plaintiff Aisha Jamilah Tiggs asserts 

Case 2:22-cv-02163-DC-SCR Document 28 Filed 01/02/25 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

there is no inherent conflict of interest between her claims and her son’s claims. (Doc. No. 24 at 

2.) Based on the representations in Plaintiff Aisha Jamilah Tiggs’ application, and a review of the 

operative complaint, the court finds no conflicts in Plaintiffs M.T.C., Jr. and Aisha Jamilah Tiggs’ 

claims. See J.M. v. Liberty Union High Sch. Dist., No. 16-cv-05225-LB, 2016 WL 4942999, at *2 

(N.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2024) (“Generally, when a minor is represented by a parent who is a party to 

the lawsuit and who has the same interests as the child there is no inherent conflict of interest.”). 

Further, the court finds Plaintiff Aisha Jamilah Tiggs to be an appropriate guardian ad litem for 

Plaintiff M.T.C., Jr., and the requirements of Local Rule 202(a) have been satisfied.

The application also meets the requirements of Local Rule 202(c). Counsel Sanjay S. 

Schmidt declares he was retained to represent Plaintiffs Aisha Jamilah Tiggs, Sequoia Brown, 

Mykeal Crumb, Simon McCormick, Jr., M.T.C., Jr., and N.C. on a pro bono basis. (Doc. No. 26 

at ¶ 5.) Counsel Schmidt states his office has also incurred substantial case costs, which he has 

decided also to provide to Plaintiffs on a pro bono basis. (Id. at ¶ 8.) Counsel Schmidt asserts he 

did not become involved in this case at the instance of the County of San Joaquin or any other 

party against whom the causes of actions are asserted, and he does not stand in any relationship 

with any of the parties or attorneys in this lawsuit. (Id. at ¶ 8.) 

Accordingly:

1. Plaintiff Aisha Jamilah Tiggs’ application for appointment as guardian ad litem for 

Plaintiff M.T.C., Jr. (Doc. No. 24), is granted; and

2. Plaintiff Aisha Jamilah Tiggs is appointed to act as guardian ad litem for Plaintiff 

M.T.C., Jr. and is authorized to prosecute the action on his behalf. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 30, 2024 ___________________________

Dena Coggins

United States District Judge

Case 2:22-cv-02163-DC-SCR Document 28 Filed 01/02/25 Page 3 of 3