Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02193/USCOURTS-ca4-14-02193-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2193

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

US ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al; NEW TECHNOLOGY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. 

(1:14-cv—03298-GLR)

Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-2193 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/18/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to 

state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the 

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Randolph v. Attorney Gen., No. 1:14-cv-03298-GLR (D. Md. Oct. 

30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED

Appeal: 14-2193 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/18/2015 Pg: 2 of 2