Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923-77/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

DECHERT LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. REQ. TO FILE DOCS. UNDER SEAL PER CIV. L.R. 7-11 & 79-5 RE: SYNOPSYS’ 

OPPOSITION TO MAGMA’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE RESPONSES TO RFA NOS. 7, 8, 11, 12, 52 AND 53; 

CASE NO: C-04-03923 MMC (JCS) 12342061.1 

Chris Scott Graham (State Bar No. 114498) 

chris.scott.graham@dechert.com 

Michael N. Edelman (State Bar No. 180948) 

michael.edelman@dechert.com 

DECHERT LLP 

1117 California Avenue

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: 650.813.4800 

Facsimile: 650.813.4848 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

SYNOPSYS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 

v.

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, a 

Delaware corporation, 

Defendant and Counter-Claimant. 

Case No. C-04-03923 MMC (JCS) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

SYNOPSYS, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS 

UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL 

LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-5 

RELATING TO SYNOPSYS, INC.’S 

OPPOSITION TO MAGMA’S MOTION 

IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE MAGMA’S 

RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR 

ADMISSION NOS. 7, 8, 11, 12, 52, AND 

53 OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR 

LEAVE TO WITHDRAW THOSE 

RESPONSES AND SERVE AMENDED 

RESPONSES

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 1068 Filed 04/17/06 Page 1 of 2
DECHERT LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. REQ. TO FILE DOCS. UNDER SEAL PER CIV. L.R. 7-11 & 79-5 RE: SYNOPSYS’ 

OPPOSITION TO MAGMA’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE RESPONSES TO RFA NOS. 7, 8, 11, 12, 52 AND 53; 

CASE NO: C-04-03923 MMC (JCS) 12342061.1 

1

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) filed an Administrative 

Motion, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, requesting to file under seal certain 

documents submitted in connection with Synopsys’ Opposition to Magma’s Motion in Limine to 

Exclude Magma’s Response to Requests for Admission Nos. 7, 8, 11, 12, 52, and 53 or, in the 

Alternative, for Leave to Withdraw Those Responses and Serve Amended Responses 

Having considered Synopsys’ Administrative Motion, and for good cause appearing 

therefore, the Court GRANTS Synopsys’ request and orders that Exhibits A, C, D, and E to the

Declaration of Michael N. Edelman in Support of Synopsys, Inc.’s Opposition to Magma’s 

Motion in Limine be filed under seal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________________ ______________________________________ 

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

April 17, 2006

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 1068 Filed 04/17/06 Page 2 of 2