Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_14-cv-00081/USCOURTS-casd-3_14-cv-00081-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights

---

– 1 – 14cv00081 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANTONIA CAMPOS, ET AL., 

 Plaintiffs, 

Case No. 14-cv-00081-BAS(NLS) 

ORDER: 

(1) GRANTING IN PART 

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE

APPLICATION TO 

CONTINUE RESPONSE 

DATE (ECF NO. 32);AND 

(2) DENYING AS MOOT 

DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR AN 

ORDER PERMITTING 

FILING OF A JOINT 

STATEMENT OF 

UNDISPUTED FACTS (ECF 

NO. 34) 

 v. 

CITY OF ESCONDIDO, ET AL.,

 Defendants. 

Presently before the Court are two ex parte motions concerning Defendants’ 

motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment. On 

December 15, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an ex parte motion requesting a three week 

extension of time to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. (ECF 

No. 32.) Defendants oppose. (ECF No. 33.) On January 5, 2016, Defendants filed 

an ex parte motion seeking leave to file a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts. (ECF 

No. 34.) No opposition was filed. 

Case 3:14-cv-00081-BAS-NLS Document 35 Filed 01/08/16 Page 1 of 2
 – 2 – 14cv00081 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Having read and considered the moving papers, and good cause appearing, the 

Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiffs’ ex parte motion for an extension of time (ECF 

No. 32). Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary 

judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment is due no later than 

January 18, 2016, and Defendants’ reply is due no later than January 25, 2016. 

Thereafter, the Court will decide the motion on the papers submitted and without oral 

argument, unless the parties are notified otherwise. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). 

The Court further DENIES AS MOOT Defendants’ ex parte motion seeking 

leave to file a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts (ECF No. 34). While the Court’s 

Chambers Rules require leave of Court to file a “Separate” Statement of Fact, the 

parties are required to file a “Joint” Statement of Undisputed Material Facts “no later 

than the reply brief.” (See Judge Bashant’s Chambers’ Rules at ¶ 4(F).) To the extent 

Defendants are seeking to file a “Separate” Statement of Fact, that request is denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 8, 2016 

Case 3:14-cv-00081-BAS-NLS Document 35 Filed 01/08/16 Page 2 of 2