Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-03378-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO 

EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

MOTION (C 02-03378 JSW)

LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB NO. 054283) 

(lpasahow@fenwick.com) 

J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB NO. 176148) 

(dhadden@fenwick.com) 

DARREN E. DONNELLY (CSB NO. 194335) 

(ddonnelly@fenwick.com) 

CAROLYN CHANG (CSB NO. 217933) 

(cchang@fenwick.com) 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, a 

Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA 

INTEGRATION, INC., formerly known as 

ACTA TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 02-03378 JSW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFF INFORMATICA 

CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE 

A SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION 

NOT TO EXCEED THIRTY PAGES 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-JSW Document 235-3 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 236 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 2
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO 

EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

MOTION (C 02-03378 JSW)

2 

On July 28, 2006, Plaintiff Informatica Corporation (“Informatica”) filed its Motion for 

Administrative Relief to File One Summary Judgment Motion Not to Exceed Thirty Pages. The 

Court has read the papers, the Motion being unopposed and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Informatica’s motion is GRANTED. 

2. Informatica may file one summary judgment motion (including brief) not to 

exceed 30 pages. Defendant Business Objects Data Integration, Inc.’s opposition brief to the 

motion shall not exceed 30 pages. Informatica’s reply brief shall not exceed 17 pages. 

3. The date for filing summary judgment motions and the briefing schedule set by 

this Court’s July 17, 2006 Order shall remain the same. 

Dated: ____________, 2006 

Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

United States District Court Judge 

Northern District of California 

23402/00400/LIT/1253357.1 

Case 3:02-cv-03378-JSW Document 235-3 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 2 of 2

August 2

Case 3:02-cv-03378-EDL Document 236 Filed 08/02/06 Page 2 of 2