Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05321/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05321-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOE THOMAS MILLER, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

LOAIZA, M.D., 

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-05321-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 65)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS (Doc. 55)

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION

Joe Thomas Miller (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding

pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred

to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. On May 11, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. Defendants filed

a Reply to the Objections on May 11, 2006. 

Case 1:03-cv-05321-OWW -LJO Document 69 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed April 19, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss based on plaintiff’s

failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, filed February

21, 2006, is GRANTED; and,

3. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 1, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05321-OWW -LJO Document 69 Filed 06/02/06 Page 2 of 2