Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02697/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02697-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IRVIN TERRELL TATUM, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-02-2697 DFL PAN P

vs.

STEVE VANCE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

A recent court order was served on plaintiff Jason Sherrill’s address of record and

returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff Sherrill has failed to comply with Local

Rule 83-182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any

address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff Sherrill be

dismissed from this action due to his failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. 

See Local Rules 83-182(f) and 11-110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:02-cv-02697-JAM-EFB Document 45 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections within

the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 31, 2006.

12

tatu2697.sher33a

Case 2:02-cv-02697-JAM-EFB Document 45 Filed 06/01/06 Page 2 of 2