Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-1_07-cv-00892/USCOURTS-almd-1_07-cv-00892-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 __________________________________

DANNY RAY HANSEL *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 1:07-CV-892-WKW

 (WO)

HOUSTON COUNTY JAIL, et al., *

Defendants. *

 __________________________________ 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On October 9, 2007 the court entered an order granting Plaintiff fifteen days to file

an amendment to his complaint. (See Doc. No. 3.) Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure

to comply with the October 9 order would result in a Recommendation that his complaint

be dismissed. (Id.) The requisite time has passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the

order of the court. Consequently, the court concludes that dismissal of this case is

appropriate for Plaintiff’s failures to prosecute this action and comply with the orders of the

court.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case

be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failures to prosecute this action and comply

with the orders of this court.

It is further

ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the said

Recommendation on or before November 13, 2007. Any objections filed must specifically

Case 1:07-cv-00892-WKW-TFM Document 5 Filed 10/31/07 Page 1 of 2
2

identify the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which a party objects.

Frivolous, conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The

parties are advised that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore,

it is not appealable.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the

Magistrate Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District

Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual

findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain

error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982). See Stein

v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of

Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the

decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on

September 30, 1981.

Done, this 31st day of October 2007.

/s/Terry F. Moorer 

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00892-WKW-TFM Document 5 Filed 10/31/07 Page 2 of 2