Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05181/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05181-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HONORIO QUIROZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

ERNEST J. LICALSI, and COUNTY OF )

MADERA, a Municipal Corporation )

and Public Entity, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

CV F 03-5181 AWI SMS

ORDER REGARDING MOTION

TO DISQUALIFY

ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER

19, 2005 HEARING ON

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is pending in this action and is set for hearing

on Monday, September 19, 2005. On August 18, 2005, Defendants filed a motion to disqualify

Plaintiff’s attorney. Defendants’ motion to disqualify is currently set for hearing on Monday,

September 26, 2005. 

Based on the nature of Defendants’ motion to disqualify, it appears to the court that it has

no choice but to decide Defendants’ motion to disqualify prior to hearing oral arguments on

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. As such, the court finds that it must continue

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment until a date after Defendants’ motion to disqualify is

heard and ruled on by the court. The parties are informed that the court is willing to hear

Defendants’ motion to disqualify on an expedited basis if the parties stipulate to an expedited

briefing schedule.

Case 1:03-cv-05181-AWI -SMS Document 104 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Accordingly, the court ORDERS that:

1. The previously set hearing date of September 19, 2005, is VACATED; and

2. The court will re-set the hearing date for Defendants’ motion for summary judgment upon

receiving a stipulation from the parties agreeing to dates for oral argument on one or both

motions. Otherwise, the court will re-set the hearing date for Defendants’ motion for

summary judgment once the court rules on Defendants’ motion to disqualify.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 29, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05181-AWI -SMS Document 104 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 2