Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-01252/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-01252-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

EAST PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

229632619.2 (WEST) STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF MOTION 

TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT / CASE NI, CV 11-1252-EJD-HRL

SHIRLI FABBRI WEISS (Bar No. 079225)

shirli.weiss@dlapiper.com

DAVID PRIEBE (Bar No. 148679)

david.priebe@dlapiper.com

ROY K. McDONALD (CA Bar No. 193691)

roy.mcdonald@dlapiper.com

RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA (Bar No. 234756)

rajiv.dharnidharka@dlapiper.com

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

2000 University Avenue

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2248

Tel: (650) 833-2000

Fax: (650) 833-2001

Attorneys for Defendants FINISAR 

CORPORATION, JERRY S. RAWLS, EITAN 

GERTEL, and KURT ADZEMA

[Additional Counsel On Signature Page]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re FINISAR CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. CV 11-1252 EJD HRL

Class Action

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING OF MOTION 

TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED 

COMPLAINT 

Case 5:11-cv-01252-EJD Document 55 Filed 03/16/12 Page 1 of 4
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

EAST PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF MOTION 

TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT / CASE NI, CV 11-1252-EJD-HRL

1

Defendants Finisar Corporation, Jerry S. Rawls, Eitan Gertel, and Kurt Adzema

(collectively “Defendants”) and Lead Plaintiff Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement 

System (“Lead Plaintiff”) hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on January 6, 2012, the Court entered an order, pursuant to the parties’ 

stipulation, setting a schedule for the filing of a Consolidated Complaint (the “Complaint”) and 

the briefing of a contemplated motion to discuss the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, on January 20, 2012, in accordance with the Court’s order, Lead Plaintiff 

filed the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, Defendants asked Lead Plaintiff for one additional week to file their motion 

to dismiss, in order to accommodate recent schedule conflicts arising for its counsel; 

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff agreed to this request; and

WHEREAS, Defendants believe that additional pages of briefing of the motion to dismiss 

is warranted and would be of assistance to the Court, and whereby Lead Plaintiff has no objection 

to additional pages so long as the parties have an equal opportunity to present their respective 

analyses of the standards applicable to federal securities complaints, including under the Private 

Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:

1. The time for Defendants to file their motion to dismiss shall be extended to March 

23, 2012, with the motion noticed for a hearing date on June 8, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. Defendants 

may file a memorandum of points and authorities of up to thirty five (35) pages.

2. Lead Plaintiff shall file its opposition to the motion to dismiss on or before April 

23, 2012, to allow for the additional time extended to the Defendants to file their motion. Lead 

Plaintiff may file a memorandum of points and authorities of up to thirty five (35) pages.

3. Defendants shall file their reply in support of the motion to dismiss on or before 

May 18, 2012. Defendants may file a memorandum of points and authorities of up to twenty (20) 

pages.

Case 5:11-cv-01252-EJD Document 55 Filed 03/16/12 Page 2 of 4
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

EAST PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF MOTION 

TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT / CASE NI, CV 11-1252-EJD-HRL

2

4. The hearing of the motion shall and the Case Management Conference shall be set 

for June 8, 2012, one week later than the current schedule; and a Joint Case Management 

Conference Statement shall be filed on or before June 1, 2012.

Respectfully submitted,

March 14, 2012 DLA PIPER LLP (US)

By: /s/ David Priebe

Attorneys for Defendants FINISAR 

CORPORATION, JERRY S. RAWLS, EITAN 

GERTEL, and KURT ADZEMA

March 14, 2012 ABRAHAM, FRUCHER & TWERSKY, LLP

Ian D. Berg (Bar #263586)

12526 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300

San Diego, CA 92130

Mitchell M.Z. Twersky

Ximena R. Skovron

One Penn Plaza, Suite 2805

New York, NY 10119

By: /s/ Ian D. Berg

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff OKLAHOMA 

FIREFIGHTERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT 

SYSTEM

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March __, 2012 ____________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

16

Case 5:11-cv-01252-EJD Document 55 Filed 03/16/12 Page 3 of 4
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

EAST PALO ALTO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF MOTION 

TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT / CASE NI, CV 11-1252-EJD-HRL

3

ATTESTATION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING

I, David Priebe, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF 

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND CASE CAPTION. In compliance with General Order 

45, X.B., I hereby attest that Ian D. Berg has concurred in this filing.

March 14, 2012 /s/ David Priebe

Case 5:11-cv-01252-EJD Document 55 Filed 03/16/12 Page 4 of 4