Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04520/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04520-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive &amp; Declaratory Relief

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX

MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,

 /

This document relates to:

Linda Jackson, 06-3658 CRB

Reava Newman, 06-4520 CRB

___________________________________/

No. MDL 05-01699 CRB

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL AND

DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF

PROSECUTION

The Court ordered plaintiffs Linda Jackson and Reava Newman to show cause why

the motion of the law firm of Hissey, Kientz & Herron, LLC to withdraw as counsel for

plaintiffs and why their lawsuits should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution. See Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41. In particular, the Court directed plaintiff to notify the Court in writing on or

before April 13, 2007 of the reasons the withdrawal motion should not be granted or the case

dismissed. The Order warned plaintiffs that their failure to communicate with the Court in

writing could result in dismissal of their actions with prejudice.

As of the date of this Order plaintiffs have not submitted any writing to the Court and

has not otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is 

//

//

Case 3:06-cv-04520-CRB Document 11 Filed 04/17/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\showcauseorders\jacksonnewmandismissal.wpd 2

GRANTED and plaintiffs’ actions are DISMISSED with prejudice for a failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 17, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-04520-CRB Document 11 Filed 04/17/07 Page 2 of 2