Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-00276/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-00276-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KELLY B. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

L. CHANZA, C. CRYER, JR, KHUONG 

PHUI, STUART SHERMAN, and 

YAGUEZI,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK (PC)

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE 

SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING IN 

COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 260

Pending before the Court is Defendants L. Chanza, C. Cryer, Jr, Khuong Phui, Stuart 

Sherman, and Yaguezi’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 84, “MSJ”). On July 22, 

2024, after being granted three extensions of time, Plaintiff filed an Opposition. (Doc. No. 90, 

“Opposition”). Upon review of the Parties respective pleadings, the Court notes that neither 

pleading conforms with Local Rule 260. Specifically, Defendants are to accompany their MSJ 

with a “Statement of undisputed Facts” and Plaintiff is required to “reproduce the itemized facts 

in the Statement of Undisputed Facts” and admit or deny each statement, as appropriate. See

Local Rule 260(a), (b). (E.D. Cal. 2023). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Within 10 days of this Order, Defendants shall file a pleading titled “Supplement to 

Motion for Summary Judgment: Statement of Undisputed Facts” in full compliance 

Case 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK Document 92 Filed 08/16/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

with Local Rule 260(a).

2. Within 10 days thereafter, Plaintiff shall file a pleading titled “Supplement to 

Opposition: Response to Statement of Undisputed Facts” in which Plaintiff admits or 

denies Defendants’ itemized facts in full compliance with Local Rule 260(b). Plaintiff 

may also file a concise “Statement of Disputed Facts,” if he wishes the Court to 

consider additional facts not included in Defendants’ Statement of Facts, as 

appropriate. (Id.). 

Dated: August 16, 2024 

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK Document 92 Filed 08/16/24 Page 2 of 2