Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00048/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00048-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN O’CONNELL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-0048 LKK KJM PS

vs.

UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS

ADMINISTRATION, et al.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Defendants’ motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment came on regularly

for hearing August 9, 2006. Plaintiff appeared in propria persona. Erika Covarrubias appeared

for defendants. At the hearing, plaintiff orally made a motion to dismiss the action without

prejudice. Upon discussion with plaintiff and counsel and good cause appearing therefor, THE

COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. Within two weeks from the date of this order, defendants shall file any

opposition, limited to five pages, to plaintiff’s motion to dismiss without prejudice. Reply, if

any, also limited to five pages, shall be filed within one week thereafter. In the alternative, the

parties may file a stipulated dismissal. 

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00048-LKK -KJM Document 29 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. No later than August 11, 2006, plaintiff may file a concise letter brief

containing citations relevant to the statute of limitations issue. Any reply by defendants on this

issue may be filed by letter brief no later than August 18, 2006. Defendants’ motion to dismiss

and/or for summary judgment shall thereafter stand submitted.

DATED: August 9, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

oconnell.oah

Case 2:06-cv-00048-LKK -KJM Document 29 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 2