Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04884/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-04884-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. & Prop Ord Re;

Briefing Schedule 1

Michael James Cronen, Cal. State Bar No. 131087

ZIMMERMAN & CRONEN, LLP

1330 Broadway, Suite 710

Oakland CA 94612-2506

Telephone: (510) 465-0828

Facsimile: (510) 465-2041 

E-Mail: mcronen@zimpatent.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Susan P. Martin and 

David E. Neal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Susan P. Martin and 

David E. Neal,

Plaintiffs,

v.

Geltech Solutions, Inc. and

RootGel West

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: 09-CV-04884 CW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CHANGING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; AND DEFENDANT

GELTTECH SOLUTIONS, INC.’S

MOTION TO TRANSFER OR

STAY ACTION 

[Civil L.R. 6-2]

Date: No hearing scheduled

Before: Hon. Judge Wilken

The parties hereto hereby stipulate, by and through their respective counsel of record, as

follows:

1. Plaintiffs’ reply in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion For Summary Judgment and

Defendant Geltech Solutions, Inc.’s reply in support of its Motion To Transfer Of Stay Action 

in this matter are presently set for March 4, 2010.

2. The parties agree to change the time for the due dates for their respective replies to

March 25, 2010. 

3. This request is not for purposes of delay but to provide the parties with sufficient

Case 4:09-cv-04884-CW Document 45 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stip. & Prop Ord Re;

Briefing Schedule 2

additional time to further discuss and explore possible settlement of their dispute and to engage

in further settlement discussions toward this end. This stipulated request is accompanied by the

Declaration Of Michael Cronen In Support Of Stipulation filed herewith in conformity with Civil

L.R. 6-2(a) and incorporated herein by this reference. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: March 1, 2010 Dated: March 1, 2010

ZIMMERMAN & CRONEN, LLP THE PHAN LAW GROUP

By: /s/ Michael James Cronen By: /s/David Z. Ribakoff

Michael James Cronen, Esq. David Z. Ribakoff, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant 

Susan P. Martin and Geltech Solutions, Inc.

David E. Neal

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________ _______________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3/22/2010

Case 4:09-cv-04884-CW Document 45 Filed 03/22/10 Page 2 of 2