Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-05241/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-05241-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Respondent is advised that should additional time be needed, such a request shall be filed with the Court. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAY LEE VAUGHN, CASE NO. CV-F-01-5241 OWW DLB HC

Petitioner, 

vs.

D. ADAMS, 

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s remand, Respondent filed supplemental briefing addressing the

procedural default bar on February 24, 2005. Petitioner filed its supplemental brief on August 11, 2005.

In his supplemental briefing, Respondent requests that should Petitioner assert specific factual

allegations that demonstrate the inadequacy of the Dixon bar, he be granted a reasonable amount of time

to respond to such assertions. Respondent’s request is GRANTED and within thirty (30) days from the

date of service of this order, Respondent shall file a response to Petitioner’s supplemental briefing filed

August 11, 2005.1

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 16, 2005 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:01-cv-05241-OWW -DLB Document 51 Filed 08/17/05 Page 1 of 1