Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-02286/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-02286-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME

CASE NO. C03 02286 JW (HRL)

- 1 -

NYB 1515821.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

LEGATO SYSTEMS, INC.

(now EMC Corp.),

Plaintiff,

v.

NETWORK SPECIALISTS, INC.

(now NSI Software, Inc)

Defendant.

Case No. CO3 02286 JW (HRL)

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

ENLARGE TIME

STIPULATION AND ORDER

Case 5:03-cv-02286-JW Document 368-1 Filed 11/21/2005 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:03-cv-02286-JW Document 369 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME

CASE NO. C03 02286 JW (HRL)

- 2 -

NYB 1515821.1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Legato Systems, Inc. (now

EMC Corporation) (“EMC”) and Defendant Network Specialists, Inc. (now NSI Software, Inc.)

(“NSI”) (collectively, “the parties”) hereby submit this stipulated request for an Order to Enlarge

Time.

WHEREAS, Defendant, Network Specialists, Inc. (NSI) has noticed for hearing on

December 19, 2005: (i) a Motion for Summary Judgment of Unenforceability of the ‘141 and

‘283 Patents Due to Inequitable Conduct; (ii) a Motion For Summary Judgment of Invalidity of

the ‘141 and ‘283 Patents Due To The On-Sale Bar and Public Use Provisions of 35 U.S.C. §

102(b); and (iii) a Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of the ‘141 and ‘283

Patents (collectively, “NSI’s Summary Judgment Motions”);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not previously requested an extension of time for the filing of

its Oppositions to NSI’s Summary Judgment Motions and Defendant has not previously

requested an extension of time for the filing of its Replies to Plaintiff’s Oppositions to NSI’s

Summary Judgment Motions;

WHEREAS, the parties believe that the extensions of time requested hereby will not alter

other dates already scheduled by the Court; and

WHEREAS, the extensions of time requested herein will provide Plaintiff, in its

Oppositions, an opportunity to more fully address issues raised in NSI’s Summary Judgment

Motions and will provide Defendant, in its Replies, an opportunity to more fully address any

issues that may be raised in Plaintiff’s Oppositions, thereby providing a more complete record

for review by the Court prior to the requested hearing on the motions, and may provide

additional time for the parties to confer and resolve issues before the requested hearing on NSI’s

Summary Judgment Motions;

Case 5:03-cv-02286-JW Document 368-1 Filed 11/21/2005 Page 2 of 3 Case 5:03-cv-02286-JW Document 369 Filed 11/23/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME

CASE NO. C03 02286 JW (HRL)

- 3 -

NYB 1515821.1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the

parties, that, the Court permitting, (i) the time for Plaintiff to file its Oppositions to NSI’s Summary

Judgment Motions be extended to December 19, 2005; (ii) the time for Defendant to file its Replies to any

Oppositions filed by Plaintiff be extended to January 9, 2006; and (iii) the time for a hearing on NSI’s

Summary Judgment Motions be set to February 13, 2006 at 9:00 A.M., or to such date thereafter as the

Court can accommodate.

Dated: November 21, 2005

McDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY

By: _____________________________

Terrence P. McMahon (State Bar No. 71910)

Vera M. Elson (State Bar No. 156327)

Lucy H. Koh (Star Bar No. 187848)

McDermott, Will & Emery

3150 Porter Drive

Palo Alto, California 94304-1212

Telephone: (650) 813-5000

Facsimile: (650) 813-5100

Attorneys for Plaintiff Legato Systems, Inc.

CLIFFORD CHANCE US LLP

By: _/s/_Mark W. Rueh________________

Drew M. Wintringham, III (pro hac vice)

James V. Mahon (pro hac vice)

Mark W. Rueh (pro hac vice)

CLIFFORD CHANCE US LLP

31 West 52nd Street

New York, New York 10019

Telephone: (212) 878-8000

Facsimile: (212) 878-8375

Daniel R. Harris (State Bar No. 188417)

Q. Huy D. Do (State Bar No. 184462)

CLIFFORD CHANCE US LLP

990 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, California 94024-1949

Tel: (650) 566-4300

Fax: (650) 566-4399

Attorneys for Defendant Network Specialists, Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: __NOVEMBER 23__________, 2005

THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE

United States District Court Judge

Case 5:03-cv-02286-JW Document 368-1 Filed 11/21/2005 Page 3 of 3 Case 5:03-cv-02286-JW Document 369 Filed 11/23/05 Page 3 of 3