Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02317/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-02317-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT BENYAMINI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HAMMER, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:11-cv-2317 TLN AC P 

ORDER 

 The court has before it defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s opposition to the motion for 

summary judgment filed at ECF Nos. 81-83. ECF No. 84. Although briefing on the motion to 

strike is not complete, the court finds that further briefing is not necessary to a fair adjudication of 

the motion. 

 Defendants argue that plaintiff’s opposition at ECF Nos. 81-83 should be stricken because 

it appears he has misfiled it in this case.1

 ECF No. 84 at 3. Upon reviewing the documents, the 

court has verified that their contents are not related to the claims in this case and appear to be 

intended for another of plaintiff’s pending cases, Benyamini v. Blackburn, 2:13-cv-0205 MCE 

AC P. The court will therefore strike the opposition at ECF Nos. 81-83 from the record. 

//// 

 

1

 Plaintiff’s opposition at ECF No. 85 appears to be correctly filed in this case. 

Case 2:11-cv-02317-TLN-AC Document 86 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Defendants’ motion to strike (ECF No. 84) is granted and the Clerk of the Court is 

directed to strike plaintiff’s misfiled opposition to the motion for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 

81, 82, and 83) from the record. The opposition at ECF No. 85 shall remain on the record. 

 2. If plaintiff seeks to have the stricken documents filed in another case, he must re-file 

them with the proper case number identified in the caption. 

DATED: May 7, 2015 

Case 2:11-cv-02317-TLN-AC Document 86 Filed 05/08/15 Page 2 of 2