Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00442/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00442-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS 

Case. No. 15-CV-442-JST 

Craig M. Stainbrook, Calif. State Bar #160876 

E-mail: craig@stainbrookllp.com

STAINBROOK & STAINBROOK, LLP 

412 Aviation Boulevard, Suite H 

Santa Rosa, California 95403 

707.578.9333 phone 

707.578.3133 fax 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, 

Incorporated and Sustaining Technologies, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Kelley Rajala,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, 

Incorporated, Et Al.,

Defendants

Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative,

Incorporated and Sustaining Technologies,

LLC,

Counterclaimants,

 vs.

Rajala, Kelley, an individual, and

Local Works, Flexible Purpose Corporation, 

A California Corporation,

Counterclaim Defendants.

Case No.: 15-CV-00442-JST

JOINT STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE 

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

Case 3:15-cv-00442-JST Document 76 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE 

Case. No. 15-CV-442-JST 

Defendants/Counterclaimants, Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, 

Incorporated and Sustaining Technologies, LLC, and Plaintiffs/Counterclaim 

Defendants, Kelley Rajala and Local Works, Flexible Purpose Corporation, by and 

through their respective counsel, jointly request that the Court grant a three-week 

extension of time by which the parties must file dispositive motions. Should the 

Court grant this request, the deadline to file dispositive motions would be moved 

from its current date of June 10, 2016, to July 1, 2016. The grounds for this request 

are as follows: 

1. Pursuant to Court order, the parties engaged in an early neutral 

evaluation on April 29, 2016, before evaluator Daralyn Durie of Durie Tangri 

Lemley Roberts & Kent, in San Francisco. 

2. The ENE process led to an agreement to settle the dispute, and a term 

sheet was executed by both parties setting out the material terms of the agreement. 

3. The Term Sheet recites that the agreement will be memorialized in a 

final settlement agreement, and that any disputes regarding the finalization of the 

agreement will be submitted to Daralyn Durie for resolution via binding 

arbitration. 

4. Since the date of the ENE, the parties, through counsel, have engaged 

(and continue to engage) in a good faith effort to conclude a final settlement 

agreement. However, there remain a few provisions over which the parties have 

yet to agree. 

5. Should the parties be unable to finalize the settlement agreement 

before June 10, 2016, the parties will cooperate in scheduling a binding arbitration 

with Ms. Durie at a time convenient for all parties and counsel. 

6. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the parties agree that in 

the interests of fairness, in the interests of resolving the matter without further need 

of court or neutral evaluator intervention, to preserve the parties’ respective rights 

Case 3:15-cv-00442-JST Document 76 Filed 06/07/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE 

Case. No. 15-CV-442-JST 

to file dispositive motions should the need continue to exist, the parties respectfully 

request that the Court grant a three-week extension of time to file dispositive 

motions in this case.

7. No other dates in the current schedule under the Amended Scheduling 

Order [Dkt 54], including dates for filing pre-trial briefs and motions, or trial, need 

be disturbed. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Dated: May 27, 2016 STAINBROOK & STAINBROOK, LLP 

 By: /s/ Craig M. Stainbrook 

 

Craig M. Stainbrook 

 craig@stainbrookllp.com 

 Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants 

 Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, 

 Incorporated and Sustaining Technologies, 

 LLC

Dated: May 27, 2016 ONE LLP 

 By: /s/ Joanna Ardalan 

 ________________________________ 

Joanna Ardalan 

 jardalan@onellp.com 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendants 

 Kelley Rajala and Local Works, Flexible 

 Purpose Corporation 

Case 3:15-cv-00442-JST Document 76 Filed 06/07/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 - 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE 

Case. No. 15-CV-442-JST 

ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN 

SHOWN, IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for filing dispositive motions is 

extended to July 1, 2016. 

Dated: June 7, 2016 

 _________________________________________ 

 Honorable Jon S. Tigar, 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:15-cv-00442-JST Document 76 Filed 06/07/16 Page 4 of 4