Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01065/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01065-50/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL D. HARRISON, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

T. MOORE, et al., 

 Defendants.

 Case No. 1:08-cv-1065-AWI-MJS (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR A SCHEDULING ORDER AND FOR 

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARRY 

JUDGMENT(ECF No. 242)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 

rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s 

Eighth Amendment claims against numerous defendants. (ECF No. 160.)

On June 1, 2015, Plaintiff requested the Court to rule on Defendants’ motion for 

summary judgment and to set a new scheduling order to “allow this matter to proceed.” 

(ECF No. 242.) 

The Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations on the motion for 

summary judgment on June 17, 2015 (ECF No. 247), and the District Judge will review 

Case 1:08-cv-01065-AWI-HBK Document 249 Filed 06/22/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

them in due course. It is not appropriate to set the case for trial until this motion has 

been resolved.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for a scheduling order and for rulling on motion for 

summary judgment (ECF No. 242) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 19, 2015 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-01065-AWI-HBK Document 249 Filed 06/22/15 Page 2 of 2