Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05183/USCOURTS-arwd-5_06-cv-05183-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 625
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF

v. Civil No. 06-5183

$9,447.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY DEFENDANT

O R D E R

Now on this 11th day of January, 2007, comes on for

consideration a letter request (filed as document #10 and referred

to herein as a Motion For Reconsideration) in which Pilar German

Villalobos asks the Court to reconsider the forfeiture of

$9,447.00, which he alleges to be his "life savings." 

A review of the file in this matter indicates that Villalobos

was personally served with a copy of the Verified Complaint Of

Forfeiture, Summons and Order Of Arrest on October 25, 2006, and

failed to assert a claim to the funds or to make answer to the

Complaint. 

Were that all there was to the matter, the Court would not

find it necessary to take action on the Motion For

Reconsideration. The Court notes, however, that at the time

Villalobos was served with the papers listed above, he was

detained at the Benton County Detention Center. Because

Villalobos was provided with the services of an interpreter at his

initial appearance, arraignment, change of plea hearing, and

sentencing, the Court believes that he is not fluent in English,

and there is no evidence that he had the services of a translator

Case 5:06-cv-05183-JLH Document 11 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: <pageID>
-2-

while at the Benton County Detention Center. Thus the Court finds

it entirely possible that Villalobos did not understand the

meaning of the papers he received.

In addition, the Certificate of Service on the Motion For

Decree Of Forfeiture states that the motion was filed

electronically "with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF System

which will send notification of such filing to" Villalobos. The

CM/ECF filing system does not, however, result in automatic

notification to a pro se litigant. It is up to the moving party

to serve pro se parties by conventional means, such as mail or

personal service. Thus, it appears that Villalobos may not have

received notice of the motion which resulted in the entry of the

Decree Of Forfeiture. 

For these reasons, the Court believes that the matter should

be reopened for consideration of Villalobos' claim on its merits.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion For Reconsideration

(document #10) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court furnish copies

of this Order and all documents heretofore filed in this matter to

Pilar German Villalobos at the following address:

Pilar German Villalobos

07811010.C.6

Rivers Correctional Institute 

P.O. Box 630

Winton, N.C. 27986

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Villalobos will be allowed thirty

Case 5:06-cv-05183-JLH Document 11 Filed 01/11/07 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: <pageID>
-3-

(30) days from the date of this Order to file a Verified Statement

of Interest, and twenty (20) days after that date to file an

Answer to the Verified Complaint Of Forfeiture. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren 

JIMM LARRY HENDREN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-05183-JLH Document 11 Filed 01/11/07 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: <pageID>