Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01025/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01025-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENELL CAVER,

Plaintiff,

v.

E. GOMEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:11-cv-01025-AWI-SKO (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT, AND REFERRING MATTER 

BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO SET 

FOR TRIAL

(Docs. 76 and 92)

Plaintiff Denell Caver (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 20, 2011. This action 

is proceeding on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed on April 10, 2012, against 

Defendants Gomez, Stark, and Garcia (“Defendants”) for acting with deliberate indifference to 

Plaintiff’s safety, in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 27, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and 

Recommendations recommending Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied. No 

Objections were filed. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Case 1:11-cv-01025-AWI-SKO Document 93 Filed 08/20/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on July 27, 2015, is adopted in full; 

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed on January 23, 2015, is DENIED; 

and 

3. This action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge to be set for trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 19, 2015 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01025-AWI-SKO Document 93 Filed 08/20/15 Page 2 of 2