Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00266/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00266-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOAQUIN MURILLO,

Plaintiff,

v.

K. HOLLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:15-cv-0266 KJM DB P

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.

§1983. Plaintiff contends that use of the Guard One security check system at the California 

Correctional Institution caused him sleep deprivation in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 

Before the court is plaintiff’s August 10 request for a settlement conference. In addition, on 

September 29, Chief Judge Mueller denied defendants Holland and Gutierrez’s motion to dismiss 

without prejudice to its renewal as a motion for summary judgment. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Within ten days of the date of this order, defendants shall file a response to plaintiff’s 

request for a settlement conference. 

2. If defendants wish to pursue the issues raised in their motion to dismiss, they shall file 

a motion for summary judgment within thirty days of the date of this order. Plaintiff shall file an 

////

Case 1:15-cv-00266-DC-SCR Document 142 Filed 10/04/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

opposition within thirty days of service of the motion. Defendants shall file any reply within ten 

days of plaintiff’s filing. 

DATED: October 3, 2023

/s/ DEBORAH BARNES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DLB:9

DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/murr0266.msj deadline

Case 1:15-cv-00266-DC-SCR Document 142 Filed 10/04/23 Page 2 of 2