Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00310/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00310-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Page 1 of 2

DANIEL SCHAFFER, et al. v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al. USDC, Northern District, Case No. C 06-0310 MMC

STIPULATION FOR PARTIES TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

LAW OFFICES OF MARK E. MERIN

Mark E. Merin, SBN. 043849

Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild, SBN. 192086

2001 P Street, Suite 100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 443-6911

Facsimile: (916) 447-8336

E-mail: mark@markmerin.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE

Gregory J. Rockwell, SBN 67305

A Professional Corporation

555 12th Street, Suite 1800

P. O. Box 12925

Oakland, CA 94604-2925

Telephone: (510) 834-4350

Facsimile: (510) 839-1897

E-mail: grockwell@bjg.com

Attorneys for Defendants

—o0o—

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

—o0o—

DANIEL SCHAFFER, on behalf of himself and

all those similarly situated; 

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ALAMEDA

COUNTY SHERIFF CHARLES C. PLUMMER,

IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL

CAPACITIES, ALAMEDA COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPUTIES DOES 1 THROUGH 50,

AND ROES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE,

Defendants.

CASE NO: C 06-0310 MMC

STIPULATION FOR PARTIES TO APPEAR

BY TELEPHONE AT CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE; ORDER

DATE: April 21, 2006

TIME: 10:30 a.m.

CTRM: 7, 19th Floor

JUDGE: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

Case 3:06-cv-00310-MMC Document 12 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Page 2 of 2

DANIEL SCHAFFER, et al. v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al. USDC, Northern District, Case No. C 06-0310 MMC

STIPULATION FOR PARTIES TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties to this action stipulate and jointly request the Court to issue an Order allowing them to

appear by telephone at the Case Management Conference presently set for Friday, April 21, 2006. The

reason for this request is that Mr. Merin, attorney for plaintiffs, has a previously scheduled union

negotiations meeting in Rancho Cordova, California, at 1:00 p.m. on April 21, 2006, and would be unable

to return from the 10:30 a.m. Case Management Conference in San Francisco in time to appear for his

1:00 p.m. meeting. In addition, Mr. Rockwell, attorney for defendants, has a 9:00 a.m. telephonic court

appearance and finds it would be easier for him also to appear by telephone at the 10:30 a.m. Case

Management Conference. 

DATED: April 17, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 

/s/ - “Mark E. Merin”

BY: 

Mark E. Merin

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DATED: April 18, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE

/s/ - “Gregory J. Rockwell”

BY: 

Gregory J. Rockwell

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties to this matter may appear by telephone at the Case

Management Conference presently scheduled for April 21, 2006, at 10:30 a.m. The Court will initiate the

call.

DATED: April 19, 2006 _____________________________________________

HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00310-MMC Document 12 Filed 04/19/06 Page 2 of 2