Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_93-cv-00306/USCOURTS-caed-2_93-cv-00306-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scheduling Order 1 Webster v. Ornoski CIV S 93-0306 LKK DAD DP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY J. WEBSTER, )

)

Petitioner, )

 )

vs. )

 )

S.W. ORNOSKI, Acting )

Warden of the California State Prison )

at San Quentin, )

 )

Respondent. )

)

 _ _ __________________________________)

No. CIV S-93-0306 LKK DAD DP

DEATH PENALTY CASE

SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING

FURTHER EVIDENTIARY

PRESENTATION 

This capital habeas action came before the Court on July 25, 2007, for a status

conference. Having considered the written materials submitted in connection with the status

conference, and after hearing from the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED as follows:

1. With regard to the ineffective assistance of counsel at penalty phase claim: the parties

will attempt to complete the deposition of trial counsel William Owen and the

depositions of the three designated experts by September 21, 2007. At the status

conference scheduled for September 26, 2007 at 9:00 a.m., the parties will be prepared to

discuss (1) whether any additional evidentiary presentation or witness testimony is

necessary on the IAC penalty phase claim and (2) a possible briefing schedule.

2. With regard to the appellate process claim:

Case 2:93-cv-00306-LKK-DAD Document 351 Filed 08/02/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scheduling Order 2 Webster v. Ornoski CIV S 93-0306 LKK DAD DP

A. On or before December 31, 2007, the parties shall file with the court and serve

upon each other the following with respect to the appellate process claim:

a. A list of witnesses;

b. Direct testimony by declaration;

c. Designation of witnesses whose further testimony will be submitted by

deposition;

d. Designation of witnesses intended to be called at the evidentiary hearing;

e. Copies of exhibits; and

f. Any documents submitted under Rule 7 of the Rules Governing § 2254

cases.

B. On or before January 14, 2008, the parties shall file with the court and serve upon

each other:

a. Any response, opposition or objections to the witness designations; and

b. Designation of rebuttal witnesses.

C. Depositions of the witnesses shall be completed by April 18, 2008.

D. April 30, 2008 at 9:00 a.m.: Status conference to assess whether in-court

testimony is necessary and to address any disputes or problems.

E. June 11, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.: in court evidentiary hearing (if necessary).

3. With regard to the insufficient narrowing claim:

A. On or before May 30, 2008, the parties shall file with the court and serve upon

each other the following with respect to the insufficient narrowing claim:

a. A list of witnesses;

b. Direct testimony by declaration;

c. Designation of witnesses whose further testimony will be submitted by

deposition;

d. Designation of witnesses intended to be called at the evidentiary hearing;

e. Copies of exhibits; and

/////

Case 2:93-cv-00306-LKK-DAD Document 351 Filed 08/02/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scheduling Order 3 Webster v. Ornoski CIV S 93-0306 LKK DAD DP

f. Any documents submitted under Rule 7 of the Rules Governing § 2254

cases.

B. On or before June 13, 2008, the parties shall file with the court and serve upon

each other:

a. Any response, opposition or objections to the witness designations; and

b. Designation of rebuttal witnesses.

C. Depositions of the witnesses shall be completed by July 31, 2008.

D. August 13, 2008 at 9:00 a.m.: Status conference to assess whether in-court

testimony is necessary and to address any disputes or problems.

E. September 10, 2008 at 10:00 a..m.: in court evidentiary hearing (if necessary).

4. This Scheduling Order supercedes the previously issued scheduling orders.

DATED: August 2, 2007.

 

Ddad1/orders.capital/webster0306.schedord.evid

submitted by: 

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, State Bar No. 89424

Federal Defender

/s/ Timothy J. Foley 

TIMOTHY J. FOLEY, State Bar No. 111558

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

(916) 498-6666

JAMES S. THOMSON, State Bar No. 79658

819 Delaware Street

Berkeley, California 94710

(510) 525-9123

Attorneys for Petitioner

Case 2:93-cv-00306-LKK-DAD Document 351 Filed 08/02/07 Page 3 of 3