Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00542/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00542-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Francisco Javier Romero, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L. Ryan, 

Respondent.

No. CV-08-00542-PHX-ROS

ORDER 

 On February 11, 2015, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau issued a Report and 

recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be 

denied. (Doc. 73). No objections were filed. 

 A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party 

has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s R&R, the district court’s review of 

the part objected to must be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are filed, the district 

court need not conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 

(D. Ariz. 2003). No objections having been filed, the R&R will be adopted in full. 

 Accordingly, 

Case 2:08-cv-00542-ROS Document 74 Filed 03/18/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 73) is ADOPTED and 

the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. 

Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

 Dated this 18th day of March, 2015. 

Honorable Roslyn O. Silver

Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:08-cv-00542-ROS Document 74 Filed 03/18/15 Page 2 of 2