Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-02360/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-02360-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 To which plaintiff has yet to file his opposition.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDDIE YOUNG,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-01-2360 LKK GGH P

vs.

R. MANDEVILLE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On February 13, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order filed January 30, 2006, granting defendants’ January 19, 2006 motion

for a stay of discovery, and vacating plaintiff’s motions to compel discovery, filed on October

17, 2005 and December 23, 2005. The order also stated that upon adjudication of defendants’

October 26, 2005 motion to dismiss,1

 plaintiff may re-notice the vacated motions, if appropriate.

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does

not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:01-cv-02360-LKK -KJN Document 67 Filed 06/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed January 30, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: June 22, 2006.

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/youn2360.850

Case 2:01-cv-02360-LKK -KJN Document 67 Filed 06/22/06 Page 2 of 2