Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02257/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02257-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation Extending Time for Fee Motion

Case No. C-02-2257SI 1

John Houston Scott (State Bar No. 72578)

The Scott Law Firm

1375 Sutter Street, Ste 222

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: (415) 561-9600

Facsimile: (415) 561-9609

Amitai Schwartz (State Bar No. 55187)

Lisa M. Sitkin ( State Bar. No. 194127)

Law Offices of Amitai Schwartz

Watergate Towers

2000 Powell Street, Suite 1286

Emeryville, CA 94608

Telephone: (510) 597-1775

Facsimile: (510) 597-0957

attorneys@schwartzlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANEITH GLEN-DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C-02--2257 SI

STIPULATION AND ORDER

SETTING TIME TO FILE MOTION

FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND

COSTS

Previously the parties stipulated and the Court ordered on March 10, 2006 

that plaintiff may have sixty (60) days from the court's entry of its order on

defendants' motion for a new trial within which to meet and confer concerning

plaintiff’s claim for an award of attorneys' fees and costs and to file a motion for

fees and costs, pursuant to Local Rule 54-6(a), if necessary. 

The court ruled on the motion for a new trial on March 5, 2007. It also

vacated its prior judgment. There is now pending before the court an additional

motion for front pay. A final judgment has not been entered. Accordingly, the

Case 3:02-cv-02257-SI Document 159 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:02-cv-02257-SI Document 160 Filed 04/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation Extending Time for Fee Motion

Case No. C-02-2257SI 2

parties believe that an additional order extending time to file a motion for

attorneys’ fees and costs following the entry of the final judgment is warranted in

order to permit them sufficient time to meet and confer regarding all monetary

claims in this case. 

Therefore, subject to the approval of the court, IT IS STIPULATED by and

between the parties herein, through their counsel of record, Rachel Wagner, Deputy

City Attorney, for defendants, and Amitai Schwartz, special counsel for plaintiffs,

that plaintiffs may have forty five (45) days from the entry of final judgment within

which to meet and confer concerning plaintiff’s' claim for an award of attorneys'

fees and costs and to file a motion for fees and costs, pursuant to Local Rule 54-

6(a), if necessary. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: May 6, 2007 ________/s/___________

Rachel Wagner

Deputy City Attorney 

Attorney for Defendants

Dated: May 6, 2007 ______/s/___________ 

Amitai Schwartz

Special Counsel for Plaintiffs

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________________

Susan Illston

United States District Judge

Case 3:02-cv-02257-SI Document 159 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
 Case 3:02-cv-02257-SI Document 160 Filed 04/09/07 Page 2 of 2