Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171-50/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

OKI AMERICA, INC., ET AL., 

 PLAINTIFF, 

VS. 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 DEFENDANT. 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS

UNDER SEAL 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 COUNTERCLAIMANT, 

VS. 

OKI AMERICA, INC., OKI ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRY CO., LTD., OKI DATA 

CORPORATION AND OKI DATA AMERICAS,

INC., 

 COUNTER-DEFENDANTS. 

WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006, Oki served the Expert Report on Damages of 

Richard B. Troxel; and 

WHEREAS, on August 31, 2006, AMD served the Second Supplemental Rule 26 

Expert Report of Alan Ratliff; and 

WHEREAS, on September 6, 2006, the sworn deposition testimony was taken of 

Richard B. Troxel; and 

WHEREAS, the expert reports of Richard Troxel and Alan Ratliff and the 

deposition testimony of Richard Troxel extensively discuss non-public, proprietary 

information relating to the development, research, design, manufacturing and sales of 

products by Oki; and 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 526 Filed 10/20/06 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

C04-03171-CRB 

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the expert reports of Richard Troxel and Alan Ratliff and the 

deposition testimony of Richard Troxel were designated by the parties as confidential under 

the Protective Order entered by this Court on December 8, 2004; and 

WHEREAS, AMD now seeks to file with the Court the expert reports and deposition 

testimony referenced above to AMD’s Fed. R. Civ .P. 72(a) Objection to the Chief 

Magistrate Judge’s September 27, 2006 Pretrial Decision. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between all parties that 

Exhibits 2, 3 and 4 and portions of AMD’s Fed. R. Civ .P. 72(a) Objection to the Chief 

Magistrate Judge’s September 27, 2006 Pretrial Decision, should be filed under seal 

because they contain confidential information protected under the Court’s Protective Order 

entered December 8, 2004. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: October 12, 2006 VINSON & ELKINS, LLP 

/s/ David P. Blanke

 David P. Blanke 

Attorneys for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD & 

EVANS, PLLC 

/s/ J. C. Rozendaal

 J. C. Rozendaal 

Attorneys for Oki America, et al. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:__________________________ _______________________________________ 

 Charles R. Breyer 

 United States District Judge 

October 19, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN D

T OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 526 Filed 10/20/06 Page 2 of 2