Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00718/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00718-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DESHAWN HARDGE,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00718-LJO-DLB PC

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OPPOSITION DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

Plaintiff Deshawn Hardge (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s amended

complaint filed April 14, 2006 against Defendants Adams and Ward for use of excessive force in

violation of the Eighth Amendment. On August 20, 2009, the Court granted Plaintiff’s requests

for issuance of subpoena duces tecum as to Warden Ken Clark. (Doc. 52.) Clark was granted up

to and including December 30, 2009, in which to respond to the subpoena for documents. On

November 24, 2008, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 39.) That motion

was taken off the Court’s calendar pending completion of discovery. (Doc. 52.) Discovery is

closed. 

1

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff is to file and serve an

opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed November 24, 2008, within

thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order. Defendants will have fourteen (14) days

after service of the opposition in which to file and serve their reply, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 29, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

3b142a UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court presumes that both parties and Warden Clark complied with the discovery orders.

1

1

Case 1:05-cv-00718-LJO -DLB Document 59 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 1