Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05621/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05621-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

\

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL SARTAIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

A.K. SCRIBNER, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 04 5621 REC SMS P 

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND (Doc. 1.) 

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

SEND PLAINTIFF BLANK CIVIL RIGHTS

FORM 

 Daniel Sartain (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on

April 26, 2004, alleging inadequate medical care. The Complaint names Warden A.K. Scribner,

Dr. J. Klarich, HCM, Dr. Jack Friedman, and Dr. Clyve Greaves as Defendants and seeks

monetary damages. 

On November 18, 2005, the Court dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend. 

Plaintiff requested an extension of time to submit an Amended Complaint on December 8, 2005. 

This request was granted to and including February 15, 2006. However, Plaintiff still did not

submit an Amended Complaint. Thus, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations on

March 2, 2006. Plaintiff filed objections on March 29, 2006, requesting that the Court allow him

Case 1:04-cv-05621-LJO -SMS Document 15 Filed 04/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

to proceed in the instant action rather than dismiss. 

The Court will grant plaintiff time to submit the Amended Complaint in compliance with

the Court’s previous Order. However, should Plaintiff fail to comply yet again, the Court will

refer the Findings and Recommendations to the District Court for resolution. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff is GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of service of this

Order to submit an Amended Complaint in compliance with the Court’s Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05621-LJO -SMS Document 15 Filed 04/17/06 Page 2 of 2