Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00711/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00711-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING 

PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. C-06-0711-MJJ-WDB 

LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (CSB NO. 115163) 

lpulgram@fenwick.com 

JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB NO. 178058) 

jwakefield@fenwick.com 

ALBERT L. SIEBER (CSB NO. 233482) 

asieber@fenwick.com 

LIWEN A. MAH (CSB NO. 239033) 

lmah@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 1200 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

Attorneys for Third Parties 

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., EMC CORPORATION

and DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

NETBULA, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BINDVIEW DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, a Texas corporation; 

SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a 

Delaware corporation; ERIC J. PULASKI, 

an individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C-06-0711-MJJ-WDB 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON MOTION TO 

INTERVENE AND MODIFY PROTECTIVE 

ORDER 

Dept: Courtroom 11 

Judge: The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 326 Filed 12/03/07 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING 

PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. C-06-0711-MJJ-WDB 

Proposed Intervenors Sun Microsystems, Inc., EMC Corporation, and Darden Restaurants, 

Inc. (“Intervenors”), have moved to intervene and modify the protective order in this action to 

obtain access to records and testimony designated as confidential by Plaintiff Netbula, LLC 

(“Netbula”). No opposition was filed by Netbula. 

At the hearing held on November 20, 2007, Intervenors were represented by Laurence 

Pulgram and Jedediah Wakefield, Netbula was represented by Vonnah Brillet, and International 

Business Machines, Inc. was represented by David Eiseman. Although Netbula did not file any 

Opposition, the Court afforded Netbula’s counsel the opportunity to argue positions espoused in 

papers filed by its principal, Dongxiao Yue and considered such positions. Good cause appearing 

therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1) Intervenors’ Amended Motion to Intervene and Modify Protective Order [Docket 

No. 306] is GRANTED, to be implemented as follows. 

2) The 60-day deadline for return of information produced or designated as Confidential or 

Attorneys Eyes Only by Netbula is hereby suspended, pending further order of the Court. 

Intervenors’ counsel is not required to return or dispose of such information at this time. 

3) It is the Court’s intention that materials produced in this action that are also relevant to the 

subject matter or any claim or defense of any party in the action entitled Netbula v. 

Storage Technology Corporation et al., No. 06-7391 MJJ (N.D. Cal.) (“The StorageTek 

action”), shall be made available for discovery and use in the StorageTek action, subject to 

appropriate protection of their confidentiality as used within the StorageTek action. 

Netbula’s and Intervenors’ and IBM’s counsel shall meet and confer to attempt to identify 

which information produced in this action shall be designated for use in the StorageTek 

action, and at what level of confidentiality (for example, Confidential, or Highly 

Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only). Counsel shall submit a joint report of no longer 

than 5 pages to the Court before the case management conference scheduled for 

December 13, 2007 in the StorageTek action, identifying their agreements on these issues, 

and, to the extent that there are disagreements, the nature of those disagreements. The 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 326 Filed 12/03/07 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING 

PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. C-06-00711-MJJ-WDB 

Court intends to resolve any disagreements at that case management conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________________________________ 

The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

United States District Court Judge 

12/1/07

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MJJ Document 326 Filed 12/03/07 Page 3 of 3