Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00008/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00008-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC RICHARD ELESON,

Petitioner,

v.

JOE LIZARRAGA, et al.,

Respondents.

1:15-cv-00008-LJO-SAB-HC

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S 

MOTION TO EXPEDITE RULING

(ECF No. 16)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254. On June 19, 2015, Petitioner filed a motion to enter an order granting the habeas 

petition and release Petitioner. (ECF No. 16). The Court will construe this as a motion to 

expedite proceedings in the pending petition for writ of habeas corpus. 

The Court notes that it does not have an expedited calendar. Petitioner is advised that the 

Court acts to resolve all pending cases in the most efficient manner possible. The Court is aware 

of Petitioner’s pending petition. On June 23, 2015, the undersigned issued a findings and 

recommendation in this matter. (ECF No. 15). The findings and recommendation contained 

notice that Petitioner may file objections within thirty days of service. (ECF No. 15). The 

assigned District Judge will then review the undersigned’s findings and recommendation

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c) and Rule 304 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United 

States District Court, Eastern District of California. The Court notes that the Court’s docket of 

Case 1:15-cv-00008-LJO-SAB Document 17 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

pending cases is substantial, and the Court must act first on those matters that have been pending 

the longest. Therefore, Petitioner’s motion to expedite must be denied. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to expedite the 

pending petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 23, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00008-LJO-SAB Document 17 Filed 06/24/15 Page 2 of 2