Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00266/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00266-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOAQUIN MURILLO, 

Plaintiff,

v.

HOLLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00266-LJO-JLT (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION IN FULL AND 

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR 

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 

(Docs. 63, 67, 73)

Plaintiff, Joaquin Murillo, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 

this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 

On November 16, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations which 

were served on the parties and contained notice that objections were to be filed within twenty-one 

days. Neither side filed any objections. Local Rule 304(b), (d). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on November 16, 2017 (Doc. 73), is 

adopted in full; and

/ / /

/ /

Case 1:15-cv-00266-DC-SCR Document 74 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief, filed on July 11, 2017 and August 17, 

2017 (Docs. 63, 67) requesting access to his legal files and to prohibit his housing 

in KVSP’s Ad-Seg, are DENIED for lack of jurisdiction over “Kern Valley Staff” 

and lack of standing since Plaintiff is no longer housed at the facility where the 

allegations he proceeds on occurred.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 18, 2017 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ 

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00266-DC-SCR Document 74 Filed 12/18/17 Page 2 of 2