Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02739/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02739-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 In his objections, plaintiff asks that the court “impose an order to both parties to restore 1

the Appeals / Parolee’s process to its original status which would be at the informal level of

response.” Objections at 5. However, Plaintiff fails to identify any legal authority in support of

his request.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUGENE JONES II,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2739 DFL KJM P

vs.

MICHAEL KNOWLES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 8, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

1

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02739-DFL -KJM Document 19 Filed 03/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 8, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant Alameida’s August 26, 2005 motion to dismiss is granted;

3. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Alameida are dismissed without prejudice

for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to bring suit; and

4. This case is closed.

DATED: 3/16/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02739-DFL -KJM Document 19 Filed 03/17/06 Page 2 of 2