Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02107/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-02107-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 10CV2107

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBYN JEAN BUCK,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 10-CV-2107 MMA (NLS)

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

[Doc. No. 7]

vs.

SD COASTLINE LP and DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

On October 8, 2010, Plaintiff Robyn Jean Buck (“Buck”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint

alleging improper eviction proceedings related to real property located at 1769 Vale Terrace Drive,

Vista, CA 92084, against Defendant SD Coastline LP (“SD Coastline”), and Does 1-10. [Doc. No.

1.] Also on October 8, 2010, Buck filed a Notice of Removal of SD Coastline LP v. Robyn Jean Buck,

case number 10-CV-2108 MMA (NLS). Both cases were assigned to the undersigned pursuant to

Civil Local Rule 40.1.d; the cases were not consolidated. On November 19, 2010, the Court

remanded SD Coastline LP v. Robyn Jean Buck to the Superior Court of California, County of San

Diego. [Case No. 10-CV-2108; Doc. No. 14.] 

On January 5, 2011, Buck and SD Coastline reached a settlement in SD Coastline LP v. Robyn

Jean Buck, and signed a “Settlement Stipulation and Mutual Release of all Claims.” The terms of the

agreement included a mutual release of “any and all past, present, and future claims, actions, causes

of action . . . which is in any manner or in any event related to . . . disputes in this unlawful detainer

Case 3:10-cv-02107-MMA-NLS Document 8 Filed 01/20/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 10CV2107

action and/or [Robyn Jean Buck’s] occupancy of [1769 Vale Terrace Drive, Vista, CA 92084].” 

On January 19, 2011, the “Settlement Stipulation and Mutual Release of all Claims” was filed

in the instant case and entitled “Joint Motion for Settlement.” [Doc. No. 7.] The filing party also

submitted a proposed order “Dismissing Entire Action With Prejudice” pursuant to Civil Local Rule

7.2.c. The Court has carefully reviewed the settlement stipulation and hereby construes the filing as

a Joint Motion for Dismissal of Action With Prejudice. 

Accordingly, good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ Joint Motion for

Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice. [Doc. No. 7.] The Clerk of Court shall terminate the

case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 20, 2011

Hon. Michael M. Anello

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-02107-MMA-NLS Document 8 Filed 01/20/11 Page 2 of 2