Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00545/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00545-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN SCOTT,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-0545 FCD KJM P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil

rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 3, 2006, the court ordered plaintiff to file an

opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendants’ December 5, 2005 motion for

summary judgment. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the February 3, 2006 order

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b) for failure to comply with court orders. Plaintiff has not responded to the

court’s February 3, 2006 order. Therefore, the court will recommend that this action be

dismissed.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action

be dismissed. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Case 2:03-cv-00545-FCD-KJM Document 46 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: May 1, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

scot0545.frs

Case 2:03-cv-00545-FCD-KJM Document 46 Filed 05/02/06 Page 2 of 2