Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00583/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00583-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

J. LEWIS, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:17-cv-00583-MCE-AC 

ORDER 

 On August 29, 2024, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s 

order denying his motion for an extension of time to serve his responses to defendants’ discovery 

requests. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless 

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does 

not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 

110 ) is DENIED. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: September 30, 2024 

Case 2:17-cv-00583-DC-AC Document 113 Filed 09/30/24 Page 1 of 1