Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05858/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-05858-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C-07-5858 PJH

sf-2504329

JAMES F. McCABE (CA BAR NO. 104686)

E-mail: JMcCabe@mofo.com

ADRIANO HRVATIN (CA BAR NO. 220909)

E-mail: AHrvatin@mofo.com

SARAH E. GRISWOLD (CA BAR NO. 240326)

E-mail: SGriswold@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

Attorneys for Defendant

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

HELEN and MARTIN YACK, on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC.; SUNLAN020105, LLC; SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, 

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 

CALIFORNIA; CLERK’S OFFICE, 

COUNTY OF BUTTE, CALIFORNIA; and 

DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

Case No. C-07-5858 PJH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING 

AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON 

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

Case 4:07-cv-05858-PJH Document 22 Filed 05/05/08 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C-07-5858 PJH

sf-2504329

1

WHEREAS, on April 21, 2008, the Court ordered that defendants respond to plaintiffs’ 

amended complaint no later than by May 7, 2008; and

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have met and conferred and agreed to a briefing and 

hearing schedule to coordinate defendants’ response to plaintiffs’ amended complaint and to 

afford the parties additional time in which to file opposition and reply briefs related to any

motions to dismiss.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their counsel of 

record, that:

· Defendants shall respond to plaintiffs’ amended complaint by May 7, 2008;

· Plaintiffs shall file their opposition by May 28, 2008;

· Defendants’ reply shall be filed by June 11, 2008; and 

· The matter will be heard on June 25, 2008, at 9:00 a.m.

Dated: May 2, 2008 DEAN D. PAIK

COHEN & PAIK LLP

PAUL S. GROBMAN

By: /s/ Dean D. Paik

Dean D. Paik

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

HELEN YACK and MARTIN YACK

Dated: May 2, 2008 JAMES F. McCABE

ADRIANO HRVATIN

SARAH E. GRISWOLD

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ James F. McCabe

James F. McCabe

Attorneys for Defendant

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

Case 4:07-cv-05858-PJH Document 22 Filed 05/05/08 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C-07-5858 PJH

sf-2504329

2

Dated: May 2, 2008 TOMIO B. NARITA

ROBIN M. BOWEN

SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP

By: /s/ Tomio B. Narita

Tomio B. Narita

Attorneys for Defendant

SUNLAN-020105, LLC

Dated: May 2, 2008 CATHERINE M. MATHERS

COLLINS COLLINS MUIR & STEWART LLP

By: /s/ Catherine M. Mathers

Catherine M. Mathers

Attorneys for Defendant

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, 

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________________

The Honorable Phyllis Hamilton

United States District Judge

5/5/08

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-05858-PJH Document 22 Filed 05/05/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. C-07-5858 PJH

sf-2504329

3

GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION

I, James F. McCabe, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Defendants’ 

Response to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. In compliance with General Order No. 45, X.B., I 

hereby attest that Dean Paik and Paul Grobman, counsel for plaintiffs Helen and Martin Yack;

Tomio Narita, counsel for defendant Sunlan-020105, LLC; and Catherine Mathers, counsel for

defendant Sheriff’s Department, County of Los Angeles, have concurred in this filing.

James F. McCabe

Case 4:07-cv-05858-PJH Document 22 Filed 05/05/08 Page 4 of 4