Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-5_15-cv-00159/USCOURTS-ared-5_15-cv-00159-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

PINE BLUFF DIVISION

ANDREW JAMES PLAINTIFF

v. Case No. 5:15-cv-00159-KGB

3M COMPANY et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

On August 29, 2016, the Court entered an Order, pursuant to the stipulation filed by the 

parties, dismissing plaintiff Andrew James’s claims against defendant 3M Company in this case 

(Dkt. Nos. 30, 31). At that time, the parties had not stipulated to the dismissal of the John & 

Jane Does 1-500 and John Doe Corporate 1-500 named as defendants in Mr. James’s complaint 

and as cross defendants in 3M Company’s answer (Dkt. Nos. 2, 3, 31). As a result, the Court 

directed the parties to show the Court within 30 days why the Doe defendants should not be 

dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. No. 31). The Court notified the parties that, if they failed to 

do so, the Court would dismiss without prejudice the Doe defendants (Dkt. No. 31). 

Thirty days have passed since the Court’s Order, and no party has responded or otherwise 

objected to the dismissal of these defendants. Therefore, the Court dismisses without prejudice 

the John & Jane Does 1-500 and John Doe Corporate 1-500 named as defendants in Mr. James’s 

complaint and as cross defendants in 3M Company’s answer. The Court denies as moot the 

motion for summary judgment filed by 3M Company and the unopposed motion for extension of 

time to file response to 3M Company’s motion for summary judgment filed by Mr. James (Dkt. 

Nos. 22, 25).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2016.

____________________________

Kristine G. Baker

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-00159-KGB Document 32 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 1