Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-04065/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-04065-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

RODNEY S. ROBBINS, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIV 05-04065 PHX ROS MEA

)

JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

) FOR DISMISSAL 

 Defendant. ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE

_______________________________)

Plaintiff filed his complaint on December 13, 2005.

On January 6, 2006, the Court ordered Plaintiff to complete and

return a service packet for Defendant to the Court by January

26, 2006. That order warned Plaintiff that his failure to

timely comply with the provisions of the order would result in

the dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure. The civil docket in this matter

indicates that Plaintiff never returned a service packet for

Defendant to the Court.

Plaintiff was warned that his failure to acquire a

waiver of service from Defendant or to complete service of

process on Defendant within 120 days of the date that he filed

his complaint, by April 11, 2006, would result in the dismissal

of the complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m), Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, and Rule 16.2(b)(2)(B), of the United States District

Case 2:05-cv-04065-ROS Document 6 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

Court for the District of Arizona Local Rules of Civil

Procedure. The civil docket in this matter indicates that

Plaintiff has failed to acquire a waiver of service from

Defendant or to complete service of process on Defendant.

On April 19, 2006, the Court gave Plaintiff until May

19, 2006, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed

for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s order of

January 6, 2006, and Plaintiff’s failure to effect service of

process on Defendant as required by the Court’s order of January

6, 2006, and Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff has failed to show cause for his failure to abide by

the Court’s orders and to effect service of process on

Defendant. 

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this case be

dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to serve the Defendant in this

matter and for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s

order of January 6, 2006.

DATED this 23rd day of May, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-04065-ROS Document 6 Filed 05/26/06 Page 2 of 2