Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00349/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00349-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

Harp v. Colvin Stipulation and Order for EAJA

E.D. Cal. 1:14-cv-00349-SAB

JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND CSBN 154575

Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC

P.O. Box 3757

Silverdale, WA 98383

Telephone: 541-419-0074

Email: jaf@forslundlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN HARP, )

) Case No. 1:14-cv-00349 SAB

Plaintiff, )

) STIPULATION AND 

) ORDER FOR EAJA FEES

)

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, )

Acting Comm’r of Social Security, )

)

Defendant, )

__________________________________ )

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned 

counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees and 

expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount 

of SIX THOUSAND dollars and ZERO cents ($6,000.00). This amount represents 

compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of plaintiff by counsel in connection with 

this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government 

will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s 

attorney. The government’s ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and 

expenses are subject to an offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s 

Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). After the order of EAJA 

fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine if they are subject to an offset.

Case 1:14-cv-00349-SAB Document 25 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 2
Harp v. Colvin Stipulation and Order for EAJA

E.D. Cal. 1:14-cv-00349-SAB

If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees and expenses are not subject to an offset 

under Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010) and The Department of Treasury’s Offset 

Program, then the check for EAJA fees and expenses shall be made payable to Dellert Baird Law 

Offices, PLLC, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney, and 

the check for costs shall be made payable to Plaintiff. The parties agree that whether these

checks are made payable to Plaintiff or Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC, such checks shall be 

mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney at the following address: Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC, P.O. 

Box 3757, Silverdale, WA 98383.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: July 14, 2015 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND

Attorney at Law

/s/Jacqueline A. Forslund

JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND

Attorney for Plaintiff

Date: July 15, 2015 BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

/s/*Kevin Gill

KEVIN GILL

Special Assistant United States Attorney

*By email authorization

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 16, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00349-SAB Document 25 Filed 07/17/15 Page 2 of 2