Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02357/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02357-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

342.05.PLE.STIPULATION.12.27.05.wpd 1 STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND 

 TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Bingham McCutchen LLP

GEOFFREY T. HOLTZ (SBN 191370)

Three Embarcadero Center

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067

Telephone: (415) 393-2000

Facsimile: (415) 393-2286

Fee & Jeffries, P.A.

RICHARD E. FEE

Bank of America Plaza

101 E. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 3000

Tampa, Florida 33602

Telephone: (813) 229-8008

Facsimile: (813) 229-0046

Attorneys for Defendant

American Marketing & Mailing Services, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

I D MARKETING, INC., a California

corporation, 

Plaintiff,

v.

MARC BOAZ, an individual, AMERICAN

MARKETING & MAILING SERVICES,

INC., a Florida corporation, CHARLES G.

CHATELAIN, an individual,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:05-CV-02357-GEB-KJM

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

IT IS STIPULATED between Plaintiff, I D MARKETING, INC. (“IDM”), and

Defendant, AMERICAN MARKETING & MAILING SERVICES, INC. (“AMMS”), that

AMMS shall have until January 6, 2005 to respond to the Complaint. There is good cause for the

extension as the parties are engaging in settlement discussions and exchanging informal

discovery.

AMMS agrees to provide the following informal discovery to IDM to the extent

the information is available, for settlement purposes only and not for purposes of admissibility,

Case 2:05-cv-02357-GEB -KJM Document 14 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

342.05.PLE.STIPULATION.12.27.05.wpd 2 STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND 

 TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

and subject to Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence as conduct or statements made in

compromise negotiations:

1. A breakdown of the transactions AMMS has conducted with IDM from

January 1, 2004 to the present, including the name of the dealership and the IDM salesperson;

2. A breakdown of the transactions AMMS has conducted with defendant

Boaz directly, including the name of the dealer, the number of pieces in the mailing, the amount

paid to AMMS, and the amount paid to defendant Boaz; and 

3. A breakdown of the transactions AMMS has conducted with Michael

Burkey directly, including the name of the dealer, the number of pieces in the mailing, the

amount paid to AMMS, and the amount paid to Michael Burkey.

This is the second extension of time sought by AMMS to respond to the Complaint. The original

response date for AMMS was December 13, 2005.

DATED: December 27, 2005 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

By: /s/ Geoffrey T. Holtz (as authorized on 12/27/05)

Geoffrey T. Holtz

 Attorneys for Defendant

American Marketing & Mailing Services, Inc C.

DATED: December 27, 2005 MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP

By: /s/ Heather L. Wallace (as authorized on 12/27/05)

 ______________________________________

Heather L. Wallace

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 I D Marketing, Inc.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02357-GEB -KJM Document 14 Filed 01/04/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

342.05.PLE.STIPULATION.12.27.05.wpd 3 STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND 

 TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case 2:05-cv-02357-GEB -KJM Document 14 Filed 01/04/06 Page 3 of 3