Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00161/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00161-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 371
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1640 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONNIE HILL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-0161 RRB DAD PS

v.

LOANSTAR MORTGAGEE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SERVICES, L.L.C., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

By order filed and served on September 21, 2007, the undersigned granted

plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to October 10, 2007 to file an amended complaint,

either through counsel or pro se. The order was served on plaintiff at her address of record and

was returned by the postal service on September 27, 2007, marked “not deliverable as

addressed.” Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint and has not filed any document since

September 7, 2007.

It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 83-182, which

requires that every party, including parties proceeding in propria persona, notify the court and all

other parties of any change of address. L.R. 83-182(f). “Absent such notice, service of

documents at the prior address of the attorney or party shall be fully effective.” Id. Failure to

comply with the court’s rules or with any order of the court may be grounds for imposition by the

Case 2:07-cv-00161-RRB-DAD Document 38 Filed 10/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or rule or within the inherent power of the

court. L.R. 11-110.

Good cause appearing, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed due

to plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint, failure to keep the court apprised of her

current address, and failure to comply with applicable rules and court orders.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

ten days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order

regarding the findings and recommendations. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.

1991).

DATED: October 19, 2007.

DAD:kw

DDad1\orders.prose\hill0161.nca

Case 2:07-cv-00161-RRB-DAD Document 38 Filed 10/19/07 Page 2 of 2