Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02523/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02523-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\2523\orderbriefing.wpd

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD BERGER, et al.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 ROSSIGNOL SKI COMPANY, INC., 

Defendant.

 /

No. C 05-02523 CRB

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ response regarding the Court’s

jurisdiction to hear their Rule 60(b) motion to vacate. The Court cannot make a

determination on the motion to vacate until it receives further briefing from parties. 

Accordingly, the parties shall meet and confer and submit a stipulation to the Court with a

date for defendant’s opposition and plaintiffs’ reply. The Court will advise the parties if oral

argument is necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 16, 2006

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-02523-CRB Document 90 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\2523\orderbriefing.wpd 2

Case 3:05-cv-02523-CRB Document 90 Filed 06/16/06 Page 2 of 2