Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00447/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00447-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM P. GARCIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEN CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00447-LJO-DLB PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

DEFENDANT A. SEINEZ FROM ACTION

(ECF No. 71)

Plaintiff William P. Garcia (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The United States Marshal was unsuccessful in

attempting to effect service of process on Defendant A. Seinez, and on May 11, 2012, returned the

summons unexecuted. ECF No. 68. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 1, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was

served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and

Recommendations was to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 71. No party filed a timely

Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

1

Case 1:10-cv-00447-LJO-GSA Document 72 Filed 07/10/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 1, 2012, is adopted in full; and

2. Defendant A. Seinez is dismissed from this action without prejudice for failure to

effect service of process pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 10, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-00447-LJO-GSA Document 72 Filed 07/10/12 Page 2 of 2