Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_03-cv-02390/USCOURTS-azd-2_03-cv-02390-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lawrence J. Warfield, as Receiver, 

Judgment Creditor, 

vs.

Michael Alaniz; Charles Davis; et al., 

Judgment Debtors, 

OM Financial Life Insurance Co.,

Garnishee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 03-2390-PHX-JAT

ORDER

On October 9, 2007, Judgment-Creditor Lawrence Warfield applied for Judgment on

Garnishment for non-earnings against Garnishee OM Financial Life Insurance Co. (Doc.

#791). In its Verified Answer, Garnishee OM Financial Life Insurance Co. indicated that at

the time the writ of garnishment was served, OM Financial owed the Judgment-Debtor

Charles Davis the total sum of $7.13. Judgment-Debtor Charles Davis did not file an

objection to the writ of garnishment or Application for Judgment on Garnishment. On

October 16, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)(Doc.

#806) recommending that the Court enter a Judgment on Garnishment against Garnishee OM

Financial Life Insurance Co. in the total sum of $7.13.

Case 2:03-cv-02390-JAT Document 821 Filed 12/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts

the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not

required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”

(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en

banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s

findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis

in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.

#806) is ACCEPTED; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING Warfield’s Application for Judgment

on Garnishment (Doc. #791) against Garnishee OM Financial Life Insurance Co. in the

amount of $7.13.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amounts retained by Garnishee OM Financial

pursuant to the writ of garnishment and this Order are to be immediately paid to Lawrence

J. Warfield, as Receiver, c/o its attorney Michael Zdancewicz, P.L.L.C. 

DATED this 6th day of December, 2007.

Case 2:03-cv-02390-JAT Document 821 Filed 12/06/07 Page 2 of 2