Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-03012/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-03012-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN W. ROSE,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-3012 MCE DAD P

vs.

D.K. SISTO,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

On March 17, 2010, the court adopted in full the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendations, filed February 12, 2010, recommending that respondent’s March 27, 2009

motion to dismiss the habeas petition as unexhausted be granted, and that petitioner’s September

28, 2009 motion for declaratory and injunctive relief be denied. The habeas action was

dismissed and judgment was entered. Although the court conducted a de novo review, having

construed petitioner’s March 8, 2010 motion for an extension of time as objections to the

findings and recommendations, petitioner has filed late objections to the findings and

recommendations. In the interest of justice, the court will vacate the March 17, 2010 order and

vacate the judgment entered on March 17, 2010.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

Case 2:08-cv-03012-MCE -DAD Document 25 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

file and petitioner’s objections to the findings and recommendations, the court finds the findings

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The court’s March 17, 2010 order (Doc. No. 22) is vacated, and judgment

entered on March 17, 2010, is vacated;

2. The findings and recommendations filed February 12, 2010, are adopted in

full;

3. Respondent’s March 27, 2009 motion to dismiss the pending habeas petition as

unexhausted is granted;

4. Petitioner’s September 28, 2009 motion for declaratory and injunctive relief is

denied; and

5. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

Dated: April 8, 2010

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:08-cv-03012-MCE -DAD Document 25 Filed 04/08/10 Page 2 of 2