Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03637/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03637-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROJELIO A. GUILLEN,

Petitioner,

v.

CLARK DUCART,

Respondent.

Case No. 16-cv-03637-WHO (PR)

ORDER REOPENING ACTION;

ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER 

TO PAY THE FILING FEE ON OR 

BEFORE OCTOBER 3, 2016

Dkt. Nos. 10 and 12

This order addresses petitioner Guillen’s motion to reopen and his application to 

proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).

This federal habeas action was dismissed because Guillen failed to comply with the 

Court’s order to file a complete application to proceed IFP, or pay the filing fee of $5.00. 

He since has filed a complete IFP application and a motion to reopen. (Dkt. Nos. 10 and 

12.) The motion to reopen is GRANTED. The action is REOPENED. The Clerk shall 

amend the docket accordingly. The judgment (Dkt. No. 8) and the order of dismissal (Dkt. 

No. 9) are VACATED. 

Guillen’s IFP application is DENIED because he can afford to pay the filing fee. 

The Certificate of Funds shows that the average deposits to his account for the six months 

preceding the filing of the IFP application were $50.00, and the average balance in his 

account for the same time period was $50.46. Guillen shall pay the $5.00 filing fee in 

Case 3:16-cv-03637-WHO Document 12 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

this matter by submitting payment to the Clerk of the Court on or before October 3, 

2016. His failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute 

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), and without further notice to him.

The Clerk shall terminate Dkt. Nos. 10 and 12. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 31, 2016

_________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-03637-WHO Document 12 Filed 08/31/16 Page 2 of 2