Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_18-cv-03142/USCOURTS-azd-2_18-cv-03142-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jon Secord,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Marketo Incorporated,

Defendant.

No. CV-18-03142-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

The Court finds it would be beneficial to schedule this matter for oral argument on 

the pending Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 60), and Cross Motion for Partial 

Summary Judgment, (Doc. 71). The parties should be prepared to discuss:

1. How the language of A.R.S. § 23-1501(B) bears on Plaintiff’s ability to seek 

relief for whistleblower retaliation under AEPA, given that Arizona statutes provide a 

separate remedy for an employer’s failure to pay wages due. The parties should review 

Reel Precision, Inc. v. FedEx Ground Pkg. Sys., No. CV-15-02660-PHX-NVW, 2016 U.S. 

Dist. LEXIS 106404, at *17 (D. Ariz. Aug. 8, 2016), and discuss whether the Court should 

follow that order.

2. Why, given the definition of “Booking” in Section C of the VICP, Section E 

of the VICP does not limit bookings eligible for quota retirement to “net new business” 

and “cross-sales.”

/ / /

Case 2:18-cv-03142-GMS Document 76 Filed 01/27/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is set for Oral Argument on Friday, 

February 21, 2020 at 2:30pm in Courtroom 602, Sandra Day O’Connor U.S. Federal 

Courthouse, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151. Each party shall

have 20 minutes to argue its position.

Dated this 27th day of January, 2020.

Case 2:18-cv-03142-GMS Document 76 Filed 01/27/20 Page 2 of 2