Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03723/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-03723-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARK WALKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al.

Defendants.

NO. C03-3723 TEH 

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT

STATEMENT

The Court has reviewed the parties’ Supplemental Joint Case Management Statement,

submitted on November 7, 2005. The Court notes plaintiff’s statement at page 2, lines 13-15,

as follows: “Plaintiff generally disputes Defendants’ characterization of the Order [re

Summary Judgment] and specifically disagrees that the issues of admissibility of evidence

and/or the scope of Plaintiff’s damages has been adjudicated by the Order.” The parties are

advised that the Court’s Order speaks for itself, and the parties’ characterizations of the Order

are irrelevant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED November 14, 2005 

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:03-cv-03723-TEH Document 114 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 1