Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00671/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00671-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISIDRO ROMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

PATRICK EATON, et al.

Defendants.

No. 1:23-cv-00671-KES-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS 

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS 

(ECF No. 18)

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. 

On January 18, 2024, the court screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint and found 

that he stated a cognizable retaliation claim against defendant K. Jackson but failed to state any 

other cognizable claims. Doc. 15. Plaintiff was granted one final opportunity to file an amended 

complaint or to notify the court of his intent to proceed on the claim found to be cognizable. Id. 

On February 12, 2024, plaintiff filed a notice of intent to proceed on the claims found to 

be cognizable. Doc. 16. Accordingly, on February 14, 2024, the magistrate judge issued findings 

and recommendations recommending that this action proceed against defendant K. Jackson for 

retaliation and that all other claims and defendants be dismissed. Doc.18. 

Case 1:23-cv-00671-KES-SAB Document 22 Filed 06/27/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this court conducted a de novo review of this 

case. Having reviewed the file, the court concludes the findings and recommendations are 

supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued February 14, 2024, Doc. 18, are 

 ADOPTED in full;

2. This action PROCEEDS on plaintiff’s retaliation claim against defendant K. Jackson;

3. All other claims and defendants are DISMISSED from the action; and

4. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2024 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:23-cv-00671-KES-SAB Document 22 Filed 06/27/24 Page 2 of 2