Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02536/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02536-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES LANDRUM JONES,

Petitioner,

v.

JAMES YATES, warden,

Respondent. /

No. C 05-2536 MHP (pr)

ORDER

This action has been at a standstill while petitioner tried to take an interlocutory

appeal. This court denied a certificate of appealability and then the Ninth Circuit denied a

certificate of appealability, thereby ending the appeal in July 2006. The case file has not

returned from the Ninth Circuit, however. 

Meanwhile, petitioner filed a "request to file additional supplementation to federal

habeas corpus petition." It is not clear what petitioner wants to file, e.g., whether he wants

to present new claims, whether he wants to present further argument in support of existing

claims, whether he wants to submit exhibits, or whether he wants to do something else. The

court will not decide whether to permit the "supplementation" until it sees it. 

Petitioner must file and serve on respondent's counsel his "supplementation" no later

than March 2, 2007. Petitioner must explain in the filing what his "supplementation" is and

explain why the "supplementation" is being filed at this late date, more than a year after his

traverse was filed. The deadline to file the "supplementation" will not be extended. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January ___, 2007 

Marilyn Hall Patel

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-02536-MHP Document 24 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 1