Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01998/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01998-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN LYNELL KING,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEROME PRICE, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-1998 KJM KJN P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed October 13, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 

to file an amended complaint was granted. On November 28, 2016, and February 21, 2017, 

plaintiff was granted extensions of time in which to file an amended complaint. Sixty days from 

the February 21, 2017 order have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint 

or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 

Case 2:16-cv-01998-KJM-KJN Document 30 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 

(9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: May 3, 2017

king1998.fta.ext

Case 2:16-cv-01998-KJM-KJN Document 30 Filed 05/03/17 Page 2 of 2