Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02452/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02452-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EAGLE VISTA EQUITIES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

LILIA BAMBAO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-02452-RS 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S NOTICE

This action was remanded on August 4, 2015 to Alameda Superior Court for lack of a 

jurisdictional basis to support its removal, effectuated by defendant Lilia Bambao on June 2, 2015. 

In her “notice” filed on August 12, 2015, Bambao now contests the remand order, arguing that she 

was unable to avail herself of any opportunity to defend against plaintiff Eagle Vista Equities, 

LLC’s motion to remand because she was not given proper notice of the motion, or of the court’s 

pursuant order. 

The record reflects proofs of service by mail to Bambao of plaintiff’s June 18, 2015 

motion to remand; the magistrate judge’s July 9, 2015 report and recommendation on the motion; 

and this Court’s August 4, 2015 order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 

and ordering the case remanded. See Docket No. 4, Exh. 7; Docket No. 9, Attach. 1; and Docket 

No. 12, Attach. 1. In any event, for the reasons set forth in the August 4 order, there exists no 

basis for federal jurisdiction in this matter. Defendants’ efforts to remove unlawful detainer 

actions are routinely and universally rejected for this reason. Bambao has supplied no plausible 

Case 3:15-cv-02452-RS Document 15 Filed 08/13/15 Page 1 of 2
<< SHORT ORDER TITLE >>

CASE NO. 15-cv-02452-RS

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

basis on which to reach a different conclusion here. The August 4, 2015 order remanding this 

action to Alameda Superior Court thus remains in effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 13, 2015

______________________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-02452-RS Document 15 Filed 08/13/15 Page 2 of 2