Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00903/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00903-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Attorneys for Defendant, ROCHELLE K. SARGENTINI; NORMAN DEAN KATO, dba 

BOB’S MARKET

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CECIL SHAW,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT A. SARGENTINI; ROCHELLE K. 

SARGENTINI; NORMAN DEAN KATO dba 

BOB’S MARKET; BOB’S MARKET, a 

California corporation;,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-00903-LJO-GSA

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME FOR ROCHELLE K. 

SARGENTINI AND NORMAN DEAN 

KATO dba BOB’S MARKET TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 

ORDER

 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Complaint was served upon Defendant ROCHELLE K. 

SARGENTINI (herein “Sargentini”) and NORMAN DEAN KATO, dba BOB’S MARKET 

(herein “Kato”) (collectively “Defendants”).

WHEREAS, Defendants’ Answer to the Complaint was due on August 11, 2014.

WHEREAS Plaintiff granted Defendants an extension of time to respond to the 

complaint to October 6, 2014.

WHEREAS the parties are exploring an early resolution and settlement of this 

matter, which will include a survey of the subject premises by a third party – and 

arrangements for the survey are underway.

Roger S. Bonakdar, #253920

2344 TULARE ST., SUITE 301

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721

PHONE (559) 495-1545

FAX (559) 495-1527

Case 1:14-cv-00903-LJO-EPG Document 14 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 4
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS the parties believe it to be mutually desirable to avoid further costs 

of litigation to discuss and explore a resolution, which is agreed to occur in a 

reasonable time after the survey is complete.

WHEREAS the Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently set for 

September 23, 2014;

WHEREAS the parties have recently began discussing a potential settlement;

WHEREAS the parties wish to conserve party and court resources so that they 

may be applied towards a resolution;

WHEREAS in light of the foregoing, the parties believe it appropriate to 

continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference to a date convenient to the Court after 

November 7, 2014 in order to explore settlement.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff

CECIL SHAW (herein “Plaintiff”) and Defendants ROCHELLE K. SARGENTINI and 

NORMAN DEAN KATO dba BOB’S MARKET (collectively herein “Defendants”), by 

and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

144(a), Defendants’ Answer or Response to Complaint, originally due on August 11, 

2014, is now due on or before October 6, 2014.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between attorneys for the 

respective parties herein that the Scheduling Conference be continued to a date after 

November 7, 2014, at the Court’s convenience.

///

///

Date: September 11, 2014 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

CECIL SHAW

Case 1:14-cv-00903-LJO-EPG Document 14 Filed 09/12/14 Page 2 of 4
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Date: September 11, 2014 BONAKDAR LAW FIRM

/s/ Roger S. Bonakdar

ROGER S. BONAKDAR

Attorney for Defendant, 

Lila Pablo-Martinez

Date: September 11, 2014 /s/ Paul C. Franco

PAUL C. FRANCO

Attorney for Defendant, 

Bob’s Market, Inc.

Case 1:14-cv-00903-LJO-EPG Document 14 Filed 09/12/14 Page 3 of 4
4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants ROCHELLE K. SARGENTINI and 

NORMAN DEAN KATO dba BOB’S MARKET (collectively herein “Defendants”), 

Answer or Response to Complaint, originally due on August 11, 2014, is now due on 

or before October 6, 2014;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference scheduled herein 

for September 23, 2014, is hereby continued to November 17, 2014 at 9:00a.m., in 

Courtroom 10 before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. The parties shall file a Joint 

Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2014 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00903-LJO-EPG Document 14 Filed 09/12/14 Page 4 of 4