Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01675/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01675-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY SWENSON, No. CIV S-08-1675-FCD-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

SISKIYOU COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. Pending before

the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 74 and supporting exhibits), filed

on July 9, 2010. After plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from the court’s April 27, 2010,

interlocutory order, the court vacated the hearing on defendants’ motion pending resolution of the

appeal. On August 25, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order dismissing

plaintiff’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court will now set a schedule for briefing

defendants’ motion. The matter will stand submitted on the papers without oral argument upon

completion of briefing.

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:08-cv-01675-KJM-CMK Document 99 Filed 09/03/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment is due

within 30 days of the date of this order; and

2. Defendants’ reply is due within 14 days after service of plaintiff’s

opposition. 

DATED: September 2, 2010

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:08-cv-01675-KJM-CMK Document 99 Filed 09/03/10 Page 2 of 2