Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00809/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00809-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The Court has previously declined to issue a certificate of appealability in this case, and therefore the case 1

will be processed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (See Court Doc. 17.) 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW R. WATTS,

Petitioner,

v.

JAMES A. YATES,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 06-00809 DLB HC

ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE OBJECTIONS

[Doc. 19]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), the parties have consented to

the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge.

On November 8, 2007, the Court denied the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus, and

judgment was entered in favor of Respondent. (Court Docs. 17, 18.) 

On November 26, 2007, Petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file

objections to the “Report and Recommendation.” (Court Doc. 19.) Then on December 4, 2007,

Petitioner filed a notice of appeal. 

1

Because both parties consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the Court’s November 8,

2007, was a final order, of which Petitioner acknowledges in the notice of appeal. (Court Doc. 

///

Case 1:06-cv-00809-DLB Document 22 Filed 12/07/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

20.) Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time to file objections to the “Report

and Recommendation,” is DISREGARDED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 7, 2007 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

ah0l4d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00809-DLB Document 22 Filed 12/07/07 Page 2 of 2