Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00109/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00109-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 445
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALMA MARIE TRICHE-WINSTON, et al., No. 2:06-cv-0109-MCE-GGH-PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

SANDRA SHEWRY, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

On December 20, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff filed objections on March 1,

2007, and they were considered by the district judge.

This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which

objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore

Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As

to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court

assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. United

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). 

Case 2:06-cv-00109-MCE -GGH Document 27 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley

Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, will

grant the motions to dismiss. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The motion to dismiss by defendants Burton and Ting, filed June 29, 2006, is granted

(docket #7, 22);

2. The motion to dismiss filed by defendant Shewry on June 28, 2006, is granted (docket

#6, 22);

3. This action is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: March 22, 2007

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00109-MCE -GGH Document 27 Filed 03/22/07 Page 2 of 2