Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-5_07-cv-00254/USCOURTS-ared-5_07-cv-00254-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

PINE BLUFF DIVISION

PATRICIA DIANE ZARYCHTA PLAINTIFF

ADC # 750461

v. NO. 5:07cv00254-JMM/BD

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY

CORRECTION, et al. DEFENDANTS

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

I. Procedure for Filing Objections

The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District

Court Judge James M. Moody. Any party may serve and file written objections to this

recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal

basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that

finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your

objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later

than eleven (11) days from the date you receive the Recommended Disposition. A copy

will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in

waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact.

Mail your objections and “Statement of Necessity” to:

Clerk, United States District Court

Eastern District of Arkansas

600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149

Little Rock, AR 72201-3325

Case 5:07-cv-00254-JMM Document 4 Filed 11/27/07 Page 1 of 2
2

II. Background

 On October 4, 2007, Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(docket entry #2). By Order of October 10, 2007 (#2), Plaintiff was directed to file an

application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00

within thirty days in order to proceed with this action. Plaintiff was further notified that

failure to comply with the Court’s order could result in dismissal of her case. Plaintiff

has not responded to the Court and the time for doing so has passed.

 III. Conclusion

The Court recommends that the District Court dismiss the Complaint without

prejudice, under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), for failure to comply with the Court’s Order of

October 10, 2007. 

DATED this 27th day of November, 2007.

___________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:07-cv-00254-JMM Document 4 Filed 11/27/07 Page 2 of 2