Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02323/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02323-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT P. BENYAMINI,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2323 FCD DAD P

vs.

T. FORSTHY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 25, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed April 29, 2010, dismissing his complaint and ordering plaintiff to file an

amended complaint. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be

upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court

finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary

to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed April 29, 2010, is

affirmed; and

/////

/////

Case 2:09-cv-02323-GEB-DAD Document 16 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Within fifteen days from the service of this order, plaintiff shall file his

amended complaint as set forth in the April 29, 2010 order. 

DATED: June 25, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02323-GEB-DAD Document 16 Filed 06/28/10 Page 2 of 2