Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-5_16-cv-00105/USCOURTS-ared-5_16-cv-00105-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

PINE BLUFF DIVISION 

REGINALD DUNAHUE PLAINTIFF

ADC #106911

 

v. CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00105 BSM

KENNIE BOLDEN, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

The partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by U.S. Magistrate Judge

J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 75] and plaintiffReginald Dunahue’s objections [Doc. Nos. 76, 77]

have been reviewed. After reviewing the record, the PRD is adopted. Accordingly,

Dunahue’s motions for a preliminary injunction [Doc. No. 33] and for summary judgment

[Doc. No. 61] are denied.

Dunahue’s objections also request review of Judge Ray’s prior decisions. See Doc.

No. 76 at 1. Dunahue requested multiple forms of relief in the same motion: (1) to strike

defendant KennieBolden’s answersto interrogatories; (2) to compel defendant Sedrick Foote

to respond; (3) for sanctions; (4) and for a cease and desist order. See Doc. No. 57. Judge

Ray granted the motion to strike and ordered Foote to respond. See Doc. No. 74. There is

no need to revisit the decision because sanctions were not appropriate. While the fourth

request was not addressed, there is no need to revisit it because the PRD addresses the

request within the context of the motion for an injunction that was denied today.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of October 2016.

Case 5:16-cv-00105-BSM Document 78 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 2
________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 5:16-cv-00105-BSM Document 78 Filed 10/21/16 Page 2 of 2