Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02856/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02856-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMONT L. CALHOUN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

M. GOMEZ, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:12-cv-2856-GEB-EFB P 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2013, the court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint and found 

service appropriate for defendants Green, Gomez, Merriweather and Young. That order gave 

plaintiff 30 days to submit the documents necessary for service of process on defendants and 

warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the order could result in dismissal of his case. The 

time for acting has passed and plaintiff has failed to comply with or otherwise respond to the 

court’s order. 

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to 

prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

Case 2:12-cv-02856-GEB-DB Document 15 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: September 19, 2013. 

Case 2:12-cv-02856-GEB-DB Document 15 Filed 09/20/13 Page 2 of 2