Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01268/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01268-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION RE: TAPEOUT SUBMISSIONS Case No. CV-04-01268 VRW

[Counsel Listed Below]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO

UniRAM TECHNOLOGY, INC., a California

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

MONOLITHIC SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, a

Delaware corporation; TAIWAN

SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING

COMPANY LTD., a Taiwan corporation, and

TSMC NORTH AMERICA, a California

corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. CV 04-01268-VRW

STIPULATED MOTION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW 

ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT LETTER

STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW 

ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT LETTER RE TAPEOUTS

Pursuant to the Court's March 23, 2006, Order Re Tapeout Files in the above referenced

matter, the UniRAM and the TSMC defendants (collectively “TSMC”) intend to submit a joint

letter addressing unresolved third-party objections to tapeout production. Due to the number of

unresolved objections, the UniRAM and TSMC seek leave to be allowed to attach and

incorporate by reference in their joint letter TSMC’s brief stating its customers' objections and

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 176 Filed 06/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION RE: TAPEOUT SUBMISSIONS 2 Case NoCV 04-01268 VRW

UniRAM’s brief stating its response to those objections, which TSMC and UniRAM exchanged

pursuant to the Court's Order. The UniRAM and TSMC believe that this will most effectively 

brief the Court on the nature of their disagreements and their respective positions regarding how

those disagreements should be resolved.

Dated: May 31, 2006 By: /s/

Edward R. Reines

Attorneys for Defendants

Taiwan Semiconductor

Manufacturing Company, Ltd, and

TSMC North America

Dated: May 31, 2006 By: /s/

Ian B. Crosby

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UniRAM Technology Inc.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, it is ORDERED that the parties may submit as attachments to a

joint letter their briefs exchanged pursuant to the Court’s March 23, 2006, Order re Tapeout Files.

Dated: May ____, 2006 By:_______________________________

Hon. Maria-Elena James

June 1, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Maria-Elena James

Case 3:04-cv-01268-VRW Document 176 Filed 06/01/06 Page 2 of 2