Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05412/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05412-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

JOSEPH W. COTCHETT (36324)

BRUCE L. SIMON (96241)

STEVEN N. WILLIAMS (175489)

GLORIA D. SMITH (200824)

COTCHETT, PITRE, SIMON & McCARTHY

San Francisco Airport Office Center

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200

Burlingame, CA 94010

Telephone: (650) 697-6000

Facsimile: (650) 697-0577

D. GREG DURBIN (81749)

TIMOTHY J. BUCHANAN (100409)

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,

WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

P.O. Box 28912

5 River Park Place East

Fresno, CA 93729-8912

Telephone: (559) 433-1300

Facsimile: (559) 433-2300

G. KIP EDWARDS (50446)

P.O. Box 1979

Kings Beach, CA 96143

Telephone: (530) 546-5892

Attorneys for Plaintiff

E. & J. GALLO WINERY

(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E. & J. GALLO WINERY,

a California corporation

Plaintiff,

v.

ENCANA ENERGY SERVICES, INC., a

Delaware corporation, formerly

known as PANCANADIAN ENERGY

SERVICES, INC. and ENCANA

CORPORATION, a Canadian

corporation, formerly known as

and successor to PANCANADIAN

ENERGY CORPORATION,

 

Defendants.

Case No.: CV F 03-5412 AWI 

LJO

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER RE: DEPOSITION OF

ENCANA CORPORATION

Case 1:03-cv-05412-LJO -DLB Document 471 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff E. & J. Gallo Winery

(“Plaintiff”) and counsel for Defendants EnCana Corporation

and WD Energy Services, Inc. (“Defendants”) have met and

conferred concerning the deposition pursuant to F.R.C.P.

Rule 30(b)(6) of Defendant EnCana Corporation;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED

between Plaintiff and Defendants EnCana Corporation and WD

Energy Services, Inc., through their respective counsel of

record herein, that:

1. The deposition of EnCana Corporation shall resume

in a suitable location at 9:00 a.m. on Friday June 3, 2005,

at EnCana Corporation’s headquarters located in Calgary,

Alberta, Canada;

2. The resumed deposition shall be governed by the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Evidence,

and all applicable Eastern District Local Rules, and shall

be conducted as if reconvened at the original location for

the deposition of EnCana Corporation, in Los Angeles,

California;

3. This Court shall have and retain jurisdiction over

any dispute that may arise relating to the resumed

deposition; and

4. Such deposition may be conducted before any court

reporter and videographer authorized to serve as a court

reporter and videographer at the local of the deposition,

that the court reporter is conferred with authority to

Case 1:03-cv-05412-LJO -DLB Document 471 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 4
administer and place the persons appearing under the oath,

and that the deposition as so transcribed and recorded shall

be usable to the same extent as if it were conducted before

a court reporter and videographer authorized to conduct such

deposition in Los Angeles, California. 

Dated: May 27, 2005

Respectfully submitted,

COTCHETT, PITRE, SIMON &

McCARTHY

and

McCORMICK, BARSTOW,

SHEPPARD,

WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

By: /s/ D. Greg

Durbin 

D. Greg Durbin

Timothy J. Buchanan

Attorneys for Plaintiff

E. & J. GALLO WINERY

and

Dated: May 27, 2005 GIBSON,

DUNN & CRUTCHER

 By:_/s/ David A.

Battaglia 

David A.

Battaglia

Louis E. Shoch

III

 Attorneys

for Defendants

ENCANA ENERGY

SERVICES, INC., 

 and ENCANA

CORPORATION

Case 1:03-cv-05412-LJO -DLB Document 471 Filed 05/31/05 Page 3 of 4
ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and agreed, and

good cause appearing, it is SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2005 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05412-LJO -DLB Document 471 Filed 05/31/05 Page 4 of 4