Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01355/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01355-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARYL LYONS, No. CIV S-02-1355-LKK-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

BUSI, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Eastern District of California local rules.

On July 1, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections

within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:02-cv-01355-LKK -CMK Document 128 Filed 08/22/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 1, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants Haynes and Wauwsrovsky are dismissed for lack of service

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m);

3. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 119) is granted in part

and denied in part;

4. Summary judgment is appropriate as to plaintiff’s claims against

defendants Frates, Moss, and Busi;

5. Summary judgment is not appropriate as to plaintiff’s excessive force

claim against defendant Dragash; and

6. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further

proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 22, 2008.

Case 2:02-cv-01355-LKK -CMK Document 128 Filed 08/22/08 Page 2 of 2