Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00145/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00145-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JORGE PINEDA IBARRA, Case No. 1:07-cv-0145 OWW NEW (TAG)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

v. TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MR. JOHN DOE (WALLACE), (Doc. 10)

Defendants. 

________________________________/

Plaintiff Jorge Pineda Ibarra (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil

rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 2). On August 3, 2007, the Magistrate Judge 

screened Plaintiff’s complaint and issued Findings and Recommendations that recommended the

complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 9). Objections to the Findings and

Recommendations were due August 20, 2007. (Id.). On August 16, 2007, Petitioner filed a motion

for a 30-day extension of time to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations, contending

that he is in segregation and thus unable to acquire documents that are “imperative” for his

objections. (Doc.10). 

The Court finds good cause for granting a one-time extension of time for Plaintiff to file

objections to the Findings and Recommendations; however Plaintiff is cautioned that the objections

must not exceed 25 pages including attachments.

ORDER 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 10) is GRANTED; 

Case 1:07-cv-00145-OWW -TAG Document 11 Filed 08/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

2. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of service of this Order to file 

 Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 9). 

3. This Order is made nunc pro tunc to August 20, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 21, 2007 /s/ Theresa A. Goldner 

j6eb3d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:07-cv-00145-OWW -TAG Document 11 Filed 08/23/07 Page 2 of 2