Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02467/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-02467-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

JILL P. TELFER (State Bar No. 145450)

LAW OFFICES OF JILL P. TELFER

A Professional Corporation

331 “J” Street, Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 446-1916

Facsimile: (916) 446-1726

Attorney for Plaintiff 

MICHAEL ASBERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL ASBERRY,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, DOES 1-20

inclusive

 Defendants.

 

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

CASE NO. CIV S.-04-2467 LKK PAN 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO LIFT THE

PROTECTIVE ORDER AS TO THIRD

PARTY PERSONNEL DOCUMENTS

 Plaintiff Michael Asberry requests this Court to lift the June 8, 2005 Protective Order regarding

third party personnel documents of employees and/or former employees which plaintiff argues are

similarly situated to him. The subject documents were produced to Chambers on August 3, 2005 and

include records of Joel C., Olivia J., Herman L., Terence D., and Clyde M. The defendant does not

oppose the request so long as the subject documents may only be used in this litigation and that all

substantive evidentiary objections be maintained to the admission of the documents at the time of trial.

After considering the Joint Statement submitted by the parties, the Courts records and files in this

matter, and a review of the documents submitted to chambers, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

The COURT HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiff’s Request to Lift the Protective Order as to the

Documents submitted to Chambers so that the parties may use the documents during this litigation in

Case 2:04-cv-02467-LKK -PAN Document 65 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER -2-

discovery, motion practice and at trial, with the caveat that those documents may be filed and/or made

part of the record in this case in connection with any legitimate bona fide motion that may be necessary

and may be offered in evidence at trial subject to any substantive evidentiary objections. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 31, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02467-LKK -PAN Document 65 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 2