Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04374/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04374-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CELERITY, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

 v.

ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS

AND SERVICE, INC.

Defendant/Counterclaimant

and

ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC.

Defendant /

No. C 05-4374 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING CELERITY, INC. TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On February 17, 2006, plaintiff/counter-defendant Celerity, Inc. (“Celerity”)

electronically filed its Opposition to Motion to Amend Order to Certify Case for Interlocutory

Appeal. Celerity has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however,

by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following

the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is

filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s

name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G;

see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

¶ 2.

Case 3:05-cv-04374-MMC Document 30 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Celerity is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Celerity is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the Court’s

Standing Order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court

may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-04374-MMC Document 30 Filed 02/23/06 Page 2 of 2