Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01609/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01609-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

NORM KRAMER, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE No. 1:15-cv-01609-DAD-MJS (PC)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENATIONS TO 

DISMISS NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS 

WITH PREJUDICE

(ECF NO. 1)

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION 

DEADLINE

Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On March 28, 2016, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and dismissed 

it with leave to amend for failure to state a claim. On grant of Plaintiff’s motion for 

reconsideration, the undersigned found cognizable a safe conditions claim against 

Defendants Mayberg, the Fresno County Board of Supervisors, Kramer, and Ahlin. 

However, the Court concluded that all other claims and Defendants were subject to 

dismissal. 

Plaintiff was informed that he could proceed on his complaint as screened on 

reconsideration or file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has now submitted his notice of 

intent to proceed only on the cognizable claims. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

Case 1:15-cv-01609-DAD-JDP Document 12 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. Plaintiff proceed on his safe conditions claim against Defendants Mayberg, 

Kramer, Ahlin and the Fresno County Board of Supervisors, and

2. All other claims and Defendants be dismissed with prejudice.

The findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District 

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

Within fourteen (14) days after being served with the findings and recommendations, the 

parties may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” A party may 

respond to another party’s objections by filing a response within fourteen (14) days after 

being served with a copy of that party’s objections. The parties are advised that failure to 

file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. 

Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 

F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 22, 2016 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01609-DAD-JDP Document 12 Filed 09/22/16 Page 2 of 2