Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-02462/USCOURTS-casd-3_09-cv-02462-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 355
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 09cv2462

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRACE L. SANDOVAL,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 09cv2462 JM(JMA)

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

vs. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

SERGIO N. SANDOVAL,

Defendant.

Over the past several years, Plaintiff Grace L. Sandoval has filed in excess of 90 separate

actions in this district. 08cv1297, 08cv1621, 08cv1622, 08cv1623, 08cv1848, 08cv1849, 08cv1853,

98cv1854, 08cv1868, 08cv1869, 08cv1870, 08cv1944, 08cv2004, 08cv2005, 08cv2057, 08cv2104,

08cv2105, 08cv2151, 09cv0269, 09cv0422, 09cv423, 09cv0424, 09cv0437, 09cv0438, 09cv0441,

09cv0454, 09cv0455, 09cv0456, 09cv0474, 09cv0475, 09cv0476, 09cv0477, 09cv0478, 09cv0491,

09cv0492, 09cv0493, 09cv0494, 09cv0495, 09cv582, 09cv0583, 09cv585, 09cv586, 09cv0588,

09cv0600, 09cv0642, 09cv1232, 09cv1506, 09cv1506, 09cv1507, 09cv1508, 09cv1514, 09cv1515,

09cv1520, 09cv1524, 09cv1526, 09cv1849, 09cv2122, 09cv2141, 09cv2148, 09cv2204, 09cv2205,

09cv2206, 09cv2217, 09cv2218, 09cv2217, 09cv2218, 09cv2244, 09cv2245, 09cv2250, 09cv2251,

09cv2252, 09cv2304, 09cv2305, 09cv2306, 09cv2307, 09cv2308, 09cv2309, 09cv2310, 09cv2311,

09cv2312, 09cv2313, 09cv2450, 09cv2452, 09cv2453, 09cv2462,09cv2463, 09cv2464, 09cv2465,

09cv2466, 09cv2467. Each action was brought in propria persona and in forma pauperis. Each

appears to have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. The present complaint fairs

Case 3:09-cv-02462-JM-BLM Document 4 Filed 11/10/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 09cv2462

no better. 

Without identifying the basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the complaint sets forth

a rambling narrative of charges and conclusions concerning, for example, theft of money from her

mother, illegal aliens, the murder of orphans, the German race massacre, drug smuggling and other

nefarious acts. As the present complaint, like the scores of previously filed complaints, fails to

identify any basis for federal jurisdiction, or to set forth a coherent statement of her claims, the court

dismisses the complaint at bar as frivolous, for failure to state a claim, and lack of subject matter

jurisdiction.

The Clerk of Court is instructed to dismiss the action without prejudice as frivolous and for

failure to state a claim. Until Plaintiff pays the filing fee or demonstrates an imminent danger of

serious physical injury, the Clerk of Court is instructed to reject for filing any further documents from

Plaintiff in this case. The court also denies Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and for

appointment of counsel as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 10, 2009

 Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller

 United States District Judge

cc: All parties

Case 3:09-cv-02462-JM-BLM Document 4 Filed 11/10/09 Page 2 of 2