Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04350/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-04350-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 448
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Education
Cause of Action: 20:1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAMALPAIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL 

DISTRICT,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. W.,

Defendant.

Case No.16-cv-04350-HSG 

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT’S

FIRST MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S 

FEES; GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR

CALENDAR CLARIFICATION

Re: Dkt. Nos. 57, 64

On February 27, 2018, Defendant D.W. filed a motion for attorney’s fees. Dkt No. 57. 

After being directed by the Clerk on February 28, 2018 to re-notice the motion, Dkt. No. 58, 

Defendant instead filed an amended motion on March 3, 2018, Dkt. No. 59. The Clerk 

accordingly issued an electronic filing error on March 5, 2018 directing Defendant to refile the 

motion in its entirety. Defendant did not file his amended motion for attorney’s fees until March 

21, 2018. Dkt. No. 63. Plaintiff Tamalpais Union High School District, in the meantime, had 

already filed an opposition to Defendant’s first motion for attorney’s fees on March 18, 2018. 

Dkt. No. 61. Due to its confusion as to which motion was operative, Plaintiff also filed an 

opposition to Defendant’s amended motion on April 11, 2018. Dkt. No. 65. Defendant has not 

filed a reply brief in support of either motion. 

In order to provide clarity as to which motion is properly before this Court, the Court 

STRIKES Defendant’s first motion for attorney’s fees filed on February 27, 2018, Dkt. No. 57, as 

well as Plaintiff’s opposition to that motion, Dkt. No. 61. Defendant’s amended motion for 

attorney’s fees, filed on March 21, 2018, is the operative motion. The Court further GRANTS

Plaintiff’s administrative motion for a calendar clarification. Dkt. No. 64. Accordingly, April 11, 

2018 is deemed to be the deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition to the amended motion, which 

Case 4:16-cv-04350-HSG Document 66 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Plaintiff timely filed, and Defendant must submit a reply brief in support of the amended motion 

no later than April 18, 2018. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

4/12/2018

Case 4:16-cv-04350-HSG Document 66 Filed 04/12/18 Page 2 of 2