Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-03810/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-03810-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Eric L. Troff, Esq., CSB #110031 

BAER & TROFF, LLP 

35 N. Lake Avenue, Ste. 670 

Pasadena, CA 91101 

(310) 802-4202 telephone (626) 568-2800 facsimile 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Instacare Corp. and 

PharmaTech Solutions, Inc. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GOTHAM INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff in Interpleader, 

 vs. 

SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 

INSTACARE CORP. and 

PHARMATECH SOLUTIONS, INC. 

 Defendants in Interpleader. 

__________________________________

AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: 5:13-CV-03810-BLF 

STIPULATION RE MOTION TO DEDESIGNATE LIFESCAN 

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND 

PRODUCTION OF SAME; AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 

 

WHEREAS, Defendant PharmaTech Solutions, Inc. (hereafter “PharmaTech”) 

filed a Motion to De-Designate the Settlement Agreement (hereafter “LifeScan 

Settlement Agreement”) between LifeScan Scotland Ltd. on the one hand, and Shasta 

Technologies, LLC (hereafter “Shasta”) and Conductive Technologies, Inc., on the 

other hand, in that matter entitled LifeScan Scotland Ltd. v. Shasta Technologies, LLC, 

Case 5:13-cv-03810-BLF Document 141 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 4
Case 5:13-cv-03810-BLF Document 141 Filed 04/27/16 Page 2 of 4
3 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: April 27, 2016 OGLOZA FORTNEY LLP 

 By:__ ______________________ 

 DAVID FORTNEY, 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 Shasta Technologies, LLC

Case 5:13-cv-03810-BLF Document 141 Filed 04/27/16 Page 3 of 4
4 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 [PROPOSED ] ORDER

 

 Pursuant to the Stipulation of counsel, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Shasta’s counsel will produce to PharmaTech’s counsel the LifeScan 

Settlement, unredacted and without any confidentiality designation, 

within five business days after this Stipulation and Proposed Order is 

signed by the Court. 

2. The hearing on PharmaTech’s Motion to De-Designate is taken off 

calendar as moot. 

DATED:_$SULO, 2016 ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

 

Case 5:13-cv-03810-BLF Document 141 Filed 04/27/16 Page 4 of 4