Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01198/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01198-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE SPITTAL,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-1198-GEB-DAD-PS

vs.

JAY SCHENIRER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled

action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On November 8, 2005, the magistrate judge filed

findings and recommendations herein which were served on all

parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed

within ten days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings

and recommendations.

Case 2:04-cv-01198-GEB-DAD Document 45 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 8,

2005, are adopted in full; 

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. no. 29) is

granted;

3. Plaintiff’s motion re contempt (Doc. no. 36) is

denied;

4. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is dismissed with

prejudice; and

5. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DATED: December 6, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01198-GEB-DAD Document 45 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 2