Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-00123/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-00123-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 1ST AMD COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JAY SMITH (CA Bar No. 166105) 

(Email: js@gslaw.org) 

JOSHUA F. YOUNG (CA Bar No. 232995) 

(Email: jyoung@gslaw.org) 

PUI-YEE YU (CA Bar No. 308122) 

(Email: pyyu@gslaw.org) 

GILBERT & SACKMAN 

A LAW CORPORATION 

3699 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1200 

Los Angeles, California 90010 

Telephone: (323) 938-3000 

Fax: (323) 937-9139 

RANDY RENICK (CA Bar No. 179652) 

(Email: rrr@hadsellstormer.com) 

CORNELIA DAI (CA Bar No. 207435) 

(Email: cdai@hadsellstormer.com) 

HADSELL STORMER & RENICK, LLP 

128 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 204 

Pasadena, California 91103-3645 

Telephone: (626) 585-9600 

Fax: (626) 577-7079 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

[Additional Counsel Listed on Next Page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 

CHRIS AZPEITIA, EILEEN FOSTER, ANTONIO 

GARCIA, APRIL MOORE, and SAMANTHA 

SCOTT, individually and on behalf of all similarly 

situated current and former employees, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING 

COMPANY LLC, TESORO LOGISTICS GP, 

LLC, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 

 

 Defendants. 

 Case No. 3:17-cv-00123-JST 

Assigned to the Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

CLASS ACTION 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

 

Case 3:17-cv-00123-JST Document 30 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 1ST AMD COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

William J. Dritsas (SBN 97523) 

wdritsas@seyfarth.com 

560 Mission Street, 31st Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2930 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Michael W. Kopp (SBN 206385) 

mkopp@seyfarth.com 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 

Sacramento, California 95814-4428 

Telephone: (916) 448-0159 

Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Timothy M. Rusche (SBN 230036) 

E-mail: trusche@seyfarth.com 

Mary Manesis (SBN 150372) 

E-mail: mmanesis@seyfarth.com 

333 S. Hope Street, Suite 3900 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Telephone: (213) 270-9600 

Facsimile: (213) 270-9601 

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 3:17-cv-00123-JST Document 30 Filed 04/25/17 Page 2 of 4
1

STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 1ST AMD COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b) and L.R. 6-2, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Chris 

Azpeitia, Eileen Foster, Antonio Garcia, April Moore, Samantha Scott, and Defendant Tesoro Refining 

and Marketing Company LLC, Tesoro Logistics GP, LLC jointly file this Stipulation and agree as 

follows: 

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint on March 31, 2017; 

WHEREAS Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint on 

April 14, 2017; 

WHEREAS Defendant’s motion to dismiss raises complex issues and the parties require 

additional time to respond; 

WHEREAS Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss within 21 

days after the Motion was filed; 

WHEREAS Defendants shall file their reply brief within 14 days after Plaintiffs’ Opposition is 

filed; 

WHEREAS the hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall remain as set by the Court; 

THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, 

1. Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss by no later than 

May 5, 2017; 

2. Defendants shall file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss by no later than 

May 19, 2017; and 

3. The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall remain on June 15, 2017, at 2:00 

p.m. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:17-cv-00123-JST Document 30 Filed 04/25/17 Page 3 of 4
2

STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 1ST AMD COMPLAINT 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

DATED: April 21, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

 HADSELL STORMER & RENICK, LLP 

GILBERT & SACKMAN, A LAW CORPORATION 

By: /s/-Randy Renick 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 DATED: April 21, 2017 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: /s/- Michael W. Kopp 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

Attestation Regarding Signatures: 

I, Randy Renick, hereby attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is 

submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 

By: /s/-Randy Renick 

Randy Renick 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 25, 2017 

 

THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:17-cv-00123-JST Document 30 Filed 04/25/17 Page 4 of 4