Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00967/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00967-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID ANTHONY FALLON,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

Defendant.

CIV S-05-0967 GEB PAN PS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

—NFN—

May 16, 2005, plaintiff filed a declaration entitled

“Forma Pauperis Application” which states, “I, David Anthony

Fallon, hereby state that I have $610.00 in cash and no personal

property of any real value.” The accompanying complaint seeks

“two trillion dollars” from the U.S. Government for “the

placement of metal parts in food, not a fast food store, which

caused major damage.”

Plaintiff’s declaration fails to provide sufficient

information for this court to assess whether plaintiff is unable

Case 2:05-cv-00967-GEB-PAN Document 2 Filed 06/06/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

to pay the filing fee without compromising his ability to provide

himself and his dependents with the necessities of life. See 28

U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); Adkins v. E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., 335

U.S. 331, 339 (1948). Moreover, plaintiff’s complaint fails to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. §§

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 

Accordingly, I recommend that plaintiff’s application to

proceed in forma pauperis be denied and the Clerk of Court

directed to close this file. 

I further recommend that plaintiff be cautioned that he

may be sanctioned pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b) if he

continues to file frivolous complaints. Plaintiff has filed

twenty-two cases in this court since 1996. This is the second of

three cases assigned to this judge within the last two months and

none sets forth a cognizable claim.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the

Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr., the United States District

Judge assigned to this case. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Written

objections may be filed within ten days after being served with

these findings and recommendations. The document should be

captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” The failure to file objections within the

////

////

////

////

Case 2:05-cv-00967-GEB-PAN Document 2 Filed 06/06/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s

order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: June 6, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00967-GEB-PAN Document 2 Filed 06/06/05 Page 3 of 3