Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-02049/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-02049-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHERINE COZAD, an individual, residing 

in California, 

Plaintiff,

v.

ASTRAZENECA LP, a Delaware Limited 

Partnership, registered to do business in 

California, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:14-cv-02049-SKO

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY 

DEADLINE

Judge: Hon. Sheila K. Oberto 

Trial Date: October 25, 2016

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff KATHERINE COZAD 

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant ASTRAZENECA LP (“Defendant”), through their respective counsel, 

that the Expert Discovery Deadline set in this case be continued from July 29, 2016 to August 31, 

2016 for the limited purposes of: 1) Plaintiff conducting a deposition of Defendant’s expert, Dr. 

Jeffrey Gould, M.D., and requesting a copy of Dr. Gould’s expert report under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 35(b), 2) Defendant conducting a deposition of Plaintiff’s expert, Leesa Allen, and 

3) Defendant conducting a deposition of Plaintiff’s expert, Kathryn M. Quinn-Crask. This 

stipulation should not be construed to limit any party’s right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

45(a)(1)(C) to include a command to produce documents in a subpoena commanding any of the 

aforementioned deponents’ attendance at a deposition. 

S. BRETT SUTTON 143107

JARED HAGUE 251517

JOSEPH V. MACIAS 273168

SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION

6715 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 216

Fresno, California 93704

Telephone: (559) 325-0500

Attorneys for Plaintiff: 

KATHERINE COZAD

Case 1:14-cv-02049-SKO Document 38 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that good cause exists for the continuance of this 

deadline as both parties have been diligently engaged in discovery and, due to the limited 

availability on the schedules of the expert witnesses, the parties require additional time to 

complete expert depositions.

DATED: July 27, 2016 SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION, P.C.

By /s/S. Brett Sutton____________

S. BRETT SUTTON

Attorneys for Plaintiff

KATHERINE COZAD

DATED: July 27, 2016 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

By /s/Andrew Woo_______________

BREN K. THOMAS

ALLISON K. PIERCE

ANDREW WOO

Attorneys for Defendant

ASTRAZENECA LP

Case 1:14-cv-02049-SKO Document 38 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

ORDER

Having reviewed the above stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the Court’s May 13, 2016, Order Regarding Modification of Expert Disclosure 

and Discovery Dates (Doc. 21) be amended as follows:

Expert witness discovery is extended to August 31, 2016 for the limited purposes of: 

1. Plaintiff conducting a deposition of Defendant’s expert, Dr. Jeffrey Gould, M.D., 

and requesting a copy of Dr. Gould’s expert report under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35(b);

2. Defendant conducting a deposition of Plaintiff’s expert, Leesa Allen; and 

3. Defendant conducting a deposition of Kathryn M. Quinn-Crask.

This modification does not change any other existing scheduling deadline, including the 

pretrial conference and trial dates.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-02049-SKO Document 38 Filed 07/28/16 Page 3 of 3