Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04637/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04637-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 490
Nature of Suit: Cable/ Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 47:553 Communications Act of 1994

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No. 5:14-cv-04637-PSG 

DWT 25910472v1 0107080-000265 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

Thomas R. Burke (CA State Bar No. 141930) 

thomasburke@dwt.com 

John D. Seiver (Admitted pro hac vice) 

johnseiver@dwt.com 

Deborah A. Adler (CA State Bar No. 209525) 

deborahadler@dwt.com 

Sanjay M. Nangia (CA State Bar No. 264986) 

sanjaynangia@dwt.com 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 276-6500 

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 

Attorneys for Defendants Comcast Corporation 

and Lawrence Salva 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CONAL O’ROURKE, an individual; 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

COMCAST CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania 

Corporation; LAWRENCE SALVA, an 

individual; and DOES 1-20, unknown 

individuals; 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 5:14-cv-04637-EJD

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT 

[Civ. L.R. 6-1(a)]

WHEREAS, on October 16, 2014, Plaintiff Conal O’Rourke (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint 

against Defendants Comcast Corporation (“Comcast”), Lawrence Salva (“Salva”), and DOES 1-20 

(“Does”) (collectively, “Defendants”); 

WHEREAS, Defendants were served on different days; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants stipulated, and the Court ordered, to extend the 

deadline for Comcast and Salva to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint up 

to and including January 14, 2015; and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward J. Davila

DATED: 1/14/2015

Case 5:14-cv-04637-EJD Document 32 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No. 5:14-cv-04637-PSG 

DWT 25910472v1 0107080-000265 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

WHEREAS, Defendant Salva contends that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction and that 

the filing of this stipulation does not in any way amount to consent to jurisdiction or waive his 

right to object to jurisdiction in this Court; 

WHEREAS, on January 5, 2015, Plaintiff and Defendants requested the Court assign this 

case to an early settlement conference, and on January 7, 2015, the Court granted the request, 

referring the case to Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal; 

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS 

FOLLOWS: 

1. The deadline for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s 

Complaint shall be extended sine die, through and including 10 days after the conclusion of the 

early settlement conference. 

2. This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by 

Court order. 

3. The filing of this stipulation does not in any way amount to Defendant Salva’s 

consent to jurisdiction or waive his right to object to jurisdiction in this Court. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: January 13, 2015 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

By: /s/ Thomas R. Burke 

Thomas R. Burke (CA State Bar No. 141930) 

thomasburke@dwt.com 

John D. Seiver (Admitted pro hac vice) 

johnseiver@dwt.com 

Deborah Adler (CA State Bar No. 209525) 

deborahadler@dwt.com 

Sanjay M. Nangia (CA State Bar No. 264986) 

sanjaynangia@dwt.com 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 276-6500 

Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 

Attorneys for Defendants Comcast Corporation 

and Lawrence Salva 

Case 5:14-cv-04637-EJD Document 32 Filed 01/14/15 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No. 5:14-cv-04637-PSG 

DWT 25910472v1 0107080-000265 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

DATED: January 13, 2015 DHILLON LAW GROUP INC. 

By: /s/ Harmeet K. Dhillon 

Harmeet K. Dhillon (CA State Bar No. 207873) 

Harmeet@dhillonlaw.com 

Krista L. Baughman (CA State Bar No. 264600) 

kbaughman@dhillonlaw.com 

John-Paul S. Deol (CA State Bar No. 284893) 

jpdeol@dhillonlaw.com 

DHILLON LAW GROUP INC. 

177 Post Street, Suite 700 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Telephone: (415) 433-1700 

Facsimile: (415) 520-6593 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Conal O’Rourke 

ATTESTATION 

I, Deborah A. Adler, hereby attest that concurrences in the filing of this document have 

been obtained from each of the signatories. 

 /s/ Deborah A. Adler 

 Deborah A. Adler 

 

Case 5:14-cv-04637-EJD Document 32 Filed 01/14/15 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No. 5:14-cv-04637-PSG 

DWT 25910472v1 0107080-000265 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

I, Natasha Majorko, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of 

California that the following is true and correct: 

I, the undersigned, hereby declare that I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party 

to this action. I am employed, or am a resident of the County of San Francisco, California, and my 

business address is: DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP, and my business address is 505 

Montgomery Street, Suite 800, San Francisco, California 94111-6533 

On January 13, 2015, I caused to be served the following document(s): 

• STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

on the interested party (ies) in this action by placing a true copy thereof and addressed as follows: 

Harmeet K. Dhillon (CA State Bar No. 207873) 

Krista L. Baughman (CA State Bar No. 264600) 

John-Paul S. Deol (CA State Bar No. 284893) 

DHILLON LAW GROUP INC. 

177 Post Street, Suite 700 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Telephone: (415) 433-1700 

Facsimile: (415) 520-6593 

harmeet@dhillonlaw.com 

mryan@dhillonlaw.com 

kbaughman@dhillonlaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Conal O’Rourke 

(By ELECTRONIC SERVICE VIA CM/ECF SYSTEM) In accordance with the 

electronic filing procedures of this Court, service has been effected on the parties above, 

whose counsel of record is a registered participant of CM/ECF, via electronic service 

through the CM/ECF system. 

(By MAIL SERVICE) I then sealed each envelope and, with postage thereon fully prepaid 

postage, I placed each for deposit with United States Postal Service, this same day, at my 

business address shown above, following ordinary business practices. 

(By PERSONAL SERVICE) I delivered such envelope by hand to the office of the 

addressee. 

 

Case 5:14-cv-04637-EJD Document 32 Filed 01/14/15 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Case No. 5:14-cv-04637-PSG 

DWT 25910472v1 0107080-000265 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

(By FACSIMILE) I transmitted the documents by facsimile machine, pursuant to California 

Rules of Court, Rule 2.306. The facsimile machine I used complied with Rule 2.301 and no 

error was reported by the machine. The transmitting facsimile machine number is (619) 

615-0700. The fax number of the party being served is listed above. Pursuant to Rule 2.306, 

I caused the machine to print a transmission record of the transmission, a copy of which is 

attached to this declaration. 

(By OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained 

by the express service carrier, or delivered to a courier or driver authorized by the express 

service carrier to receive documents, in an envelope or package with delivery fees paid or 

provided for, and addressed on whom it is to be served pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 

section 10 13(c). 

(By E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION) Based on a court order or an 

agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the 

documents to be sent to the person(s) at the email addresses listed above. I did not receive, 

within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication 

that the transmission was unsuccessful. 

I declare that I am employed by the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose 

direction the service was made. 

Executed January 13, 2015, at San Francisco, California. 

/s/ Natasha Majorko 

Natasha Majorko 

Case 5:14-cv-04637-EJD Document 32 Filed 01/14/15 Page 5 of 5