Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02590/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-02590-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REJECTS SKATE MAGAZINE, INC., a

Tennessee Corporation; WESLEY M.

DRIVER; RADIUS MEDIA, LLC, an Alabama

limited liability corporation; and

SHAWN ENGLER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ACUTRACK, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 06-2590 CW

ORDER DENYING

DEFENDANT'S

MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO FILE MOTION

FOR PARTIAL

RECONSIDERATION

OF ORDER GRANTING

IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS 

Defendant Acutrack, Inc., has filed a motion for partial

reconsideration of the Court's August 22, 2006, order granting in

part and denying in part Defendant's motion to dismiss. Under

Local Rule 7-9, a motion for leave to file a motion for

reconsideration may only be granted if the moving party shows:

(1) That at the time of the motion for leave, a material

difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented

Case 4:06-cv-02590-CW Document 32 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

to the Court before entry of the interlocutory order for which

reconsideration is sought. The party also must show that in

the exercise of reasonable diligence the party applying for

reconsideration did not know such fact or law at the time of

the interlocutory order; or (2) The emergence of new material

facts or change of law occurring after the time of such order;

or (3) A manifest failure by the Court to consider material

facts or dispositive legal arguments which were presented to

the Court before such interlocutory order.

Civil L.R. 7-9(b).

Defendant Acutrack, Inc., has failed to satisfy any

requirement listed by Civil Local Rule 7-9(b) for obtaining leave

to file a motion for reconsideration. The Court denies Defendant's

motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 9/11/06 

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-02590-CW Document 32 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 2