Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05674/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-05674-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APRIL COYLE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 16-05674 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO

HAC VICE APPLICATION

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Andrew Soukup (Dkt. No. 31) is DENIED for

failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. That rule requires an applicant to certify that “he or she

is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court

of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out

the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it identifies only the state of bar

membership — e.g., “the bar of the District of Columbia” — is inadequate under the rule

because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid

again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 30, 2016. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-05674-WHA Document 32 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 1