Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04099/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04099-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARTIN V. FIRST RESOLUTION INVESTMENT CORPORATION, ET AL. (CASE NO. C06-04099 PJH)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO COMPEL 1

TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576)

JEFFREY A. TOPOR (SBN 195545)

SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3010

San Francisco, CA 94104-4816

Telephone: (415) 283-1000

Facsimile: (415) 352-2625

tnarita@snllp.com

jtopor@snllp.com

Attorneys for Defendant

First Resolution Investment Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHLEEN MARTIN,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

FIRST RESOLUTION

INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a

corporation; EDGAR J. LANA, PC, a

professional corporation; and DOES

1through 10 inclusive 

 Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C06-04099 PJH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL FURTHER

DISCOVERY RESPONSES

Case 4:06-cv-04099-PJH Document 39 Filed 08/15/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARTIN V. FIRST RESOLUTION INVESTMENT CORPORATION, ET AL. (CASE NO. C06-04099 PJH)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO COMPEL 2

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed Motion to Compel Further Responses to

Discovery by First Resolution Investment Corporation and set the motion for

hearing on August 22, 2007; and

WHEREAS defendant First Resolution Corporation recently retained new

counsel on August 3, 2007; and

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s

motion to compel; and

WHEREAS defendant First Resolution Corporation waives any objection it

may have to a) having the hearing of Plaintiff’s motion to compel held after the

scheduled discovery cut-off date in this matter, b) producing responses if any as

directed by the court, and c) any further hearings necessary in the event plaintiff

believes that any such supplemental responses are inadequate. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties to

continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion to compel to October 3, 2007,

commencing at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom C, 15 Floor, at 450 Golden Gate

th

Avenue, San Francisco, California, before the Honorable Magistrate Judge

Edward M. Chen. 

Further, defendant First Resolution Corporation’s opposition to Plaintiff’s

motion shall be filed on or before September 12, 2007, and Plaintiff’s reply in

support of her motion shall be filed on or before September 19, 2007.

DATED: August 14 , 2007 SIMMONDS & NARITA, LLP

TOMIO B. NARITA

JEFFREY A. TOPOR

By: s/Tomio B. Narita 

 Tomio B. Narita

Attorneys for defendant

First Resolution Corporation

Case 4:06-cv-04099-PJH Document 39 Filed 08/15/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARTIN V. FIRST RESOLUTION INVESTMENT CORPORATION, ET AL. (CASE NO. C06-04099 PJH)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO COMPEL 3

DATED: August 14, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF ERIC F. FAGAN

ERIC F. FAGAN

JEREMY S. GOLDEN

By: s/Jeremy S. Golden 

 Jeremy S. Golden

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: , 2007 

 The Honorable Edward M. Chen

United States Magistrate Judge

August 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 4:06-cv-04099-PJH Document 39 Filed 08/15/07 Page 3 of 3