Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06459/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-06459-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTOR J. BRAVO,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. PIROZZI, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 12-cv-06459-EMC 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 

REQUEST FOR RELIEF

Docket No. 75

A final judgment in the above-referenced case was entered on January 9, 2014. See

Docket No. 68 (final judgment). Plaintiff thereafter appealed to the Ninth Circuit but the appeal 

was rejected. See Docket No. 73 (Ninth Circuit order, dated July 11, 2014). Plaintiff has now 

filed another document in this case in which he asks the Court to “show me the California law(s) 

[that] permit[ted] the State of California to imprison me during the (above-stated) period of time.” 

Req. at 4. The Court notes that it cited relevant authority in its prior order of December 2, 2013. 

See Docket No. 62 (order to show cause); see also Docket No. 67 (order) (adopting analysis in 

order to show cause). Furthermore, Plaintiff is basically trying to resuscitate this case, even after 

his appeal was rejected. Accordingly, for both reasons, the Court DENIES his pending request 

for relief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 7, 2015

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:12-cv-06459-EMC Document 76 Filed 12/07/15 Page 1 of 1