Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00038/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00038-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION 

NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC 

CAROLYN KUBOTA (SBN 113660) 

ckubota@omm.com 

SCOTT M. VOELZ (SBN 181415) 

svoelz@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

400 South Hope Street 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Tel: (213) 430-6000 

Fax: (213) 430-6407 

Attorneys for Defendant 

FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, 

INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DEAN ALEXANDER, et al. 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, 

INC., et al., 

Defendant. 

Case No: 3:05-cv-38 EMC

NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF 

PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT 

ORDER 

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

Pursuant to the Court’s instructions at the March 26, 2015 case management conference, 

defendant FedEx Ground Package System submits as Exhibit A the attached Proposed Case 

Management Order setting forth the Court’s ruling. FedEx has met and conferred with Plaintiffs 

and they have no objection to the Proposed Order. 

Case 3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document 102 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101 Filed04/02/15 Page1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION 

NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC 

Dated: April 2, 2015 By: /s/ Scott Voelz 

 Carolyn Kubota 

 Scott M. Voelz 

 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

 400 South Hope Street 

 Los Angeles, California 90071 

 Tel: (213) 430-6000 

Attorneys for Defendant FedEx Ground 

Package System, Inc.

Case 3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document 102 Filed 04/06/15 Page 2 of 5 Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101 Filed04/02/15 Page2 of 2
EXHIBIT A 

Case 3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document 102 Filed 04/06/15 Page 3 of 5 Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101-1 Filed04/02/15 Page1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

[PROPOSED] CASE 

MANAGEMENT ORDER 

NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DEAN ALEXANDER, et al. 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, 

INC., et al., 

Defendant. 

Case No: 3:05-cv-38 EMC

[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT 

ORDER 

 In the above-captioned matter, plaintiffs and defendant FedEx Ground Package System, 

Inc. (“FXG”) submitted a Joint Case Management Statement (Dckt # 94) on March 19, 2015, and 

appeared for a case management conference on March 26. Having reviewed the parties’ joint 

statement and discussed their positions regarding appropriate pretrial proceedings, the Court 

determines that certain issues regarding the scope of recoverable damages and the definitions of 

the class and the overtime subclass, should be decided before formal discovery and further 

proceedings in this case. 

 Accordingly, the Court orders the following schedule for briefing and argument of the 

motions described below: 

(1) a motion by FXG to clarify the class definitions with respect to the requirement that 

class members “drove a vehicle on a full-time basis (meaning exclusive of time off for 

commonly excused employment absences)” 

(2) a motion by FXG to limit plaintiffs’ recoverable damages period; and 

(3) a motion by FXG to limit plaintiffs’ recovery for certain categories of work-related 

expenses under Sections 221–224, and 2802 of the California Labor Code. 

Case 3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document 102 Filed 04/06/15 Page 4 of 5 Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101-1 Filed04/02/15 Page2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

[PROPOSED] CASE 

MANAGEMENT ORDER 

NO. 3:05-cv-38 EMC 

Event / Item Due Date / Deadline 

Defendant’s Motions Due May 14, 2015 

Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to Motions Due June 25, 2015 

Defendants’ Replies to Motions Due July 15, 2015 

Motions Heard July 30, 2015 

 The parties are ordered to further meet and confer with regard to these motions prior to 

filing. 

Dated: 

 ______________________________ 

 EDWARD M. CHEN 

 United States District Judge 

 

Case3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document101-1 Filed04/02/15 Page3 of 3

4/6/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:05-cv-00038-EMC Document 102 Filed 04/06/15 Page 5 of 5