Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00538/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00538-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joao Cornelio, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Intel Corp., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-538-PHX-JAT

ORDER

On February 8, 2008, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in state court. Defendant removed

the case on March 19, 2008, and then answered on March 26, 2008 (Doc. #5). Plaintiff filed

his jury trial demand on May 6, 2008 (Doc. #10).

Defendant filed the pending Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Request for Jury Trial (Doc.

#15) on May 22, 2008. Defendant argues that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern

the time for filing Plaintiff’s jury demand. And, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

38(b), Plaintiff had ten days from the time of Defendant’s Answer to make the jury demand.

The Defendant therefore argues that Plaintiff’s demand was untimely.

Plaintiff failed to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Strike. Pursuant to Local Rule

of Civil Procedure 7.2(i), the Court will deem Plaintiff’s failure to respond as consent to the

motion.

///

///

Case 2:08-cv-00538-JAT Document 25 Filed 09/05/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Request for

Jury Trial (Doc. #15). The Clerk of the Court shall strike Docket #10.

DATED this 4th day of September, 2008.

Case 2:08-cv-00538-JAT Document 25 Filed 09/05/08 Page 2 of 2