Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03236/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03236-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 CASE NO. 14-CV-03236-RMW 

Michael J. Bettinger, SBN 122196

mbettinger@sidley.com 

Rachel R. Davidson, SBN 215517 

rachel.davidson@sidley.com 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Claimant 

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. and Defendant 

STMICROELECTRONICS S.R.L. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. and 

STMICROELECTRONICS, S.R.L., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 14-cv-03236-RMW 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

ORDER 

 Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte 

A further Case Management Conference was held on January 22, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. before 

the Honorable Ronald M. Whyte. Krista M. Enns and Shawn Gebhardt of Winston & Strawn LLP 

appeared for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) and Rachel R. Davidson 

of Sidley Austin LLP appeared for Defendant and Counter-Plaintiffs STMicroelectronics, Inc., and 

STMicroelectronics, S.r.L. (collectively “STMicro”). 

The Court ordered as follows: 

1. Cisco and STMicro shall serve supplemental Initial Disclosures by February 22, 

2016; 

2. Cisco and STMicro shall submit a letter brief not to exceed five (5) pages on 

February 1, 2016 regarding the issue of extending the initial discovery period to 

Case 3:14-cv-03236-RS Document 144 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2 

CASE NO. 14-CV-03236-RMW 

January 1, 2012, as proposed by Cisco, or limiting it to November 1, 2012, as 

proposed by STMicro. STMicro shall submit a declaration explaining why the 

initial discovery period proposed by Cisco would be burdensome; 

3. The parties are to meet and confer to develop a new proposed schedule by the 

parties’ next Case Management Conference; 

4. The parties will hold a mediation in late August, 2016; 

5. The parties are limited to taking three (3) depositions per side prior to mediation; 

6. Each party shall be limited to serving thirty (30) interrogatories; 

7. The Court is considering a potential trial date in November or early December 

2017; and 

8. A further Case Management Conference is set for September 16, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. 

in Courtroom 6th, 4th Floor. The parties shall submit a Joint Case Management 

Statement on September 6, 2016. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: , 2016 

 By: 

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

United States District Judge 

Approved as to form: 

 By: /s/ Krista M. Enns 

Krista M. Enns 

Counsel Cisco Systems, Inc. 

1/27

Case 3:14-cv-03236-RS Document 144 Filed 01/27/16 Page 2 of 2