Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02569/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02569-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOHN WILLIAM FERRIS, V, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:14-cv-02569 AC 

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 By an order filed November 5, 2014 plaintiff was ordered to file either a proper in forma 

pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within twenty days. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff was 

cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. 

The twenty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and 

has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign a district court 

judge to this case; and 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

Case 2:14-cv-02569-AC Document 4 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 

shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are 

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 

District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: December 4, 2014 

Case 2:14-cv-02569-AC Document 4 Filed 12/05/14 Page 2 of 2