Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01556/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01556-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1556

BISMARK KWAKU TORKORNOO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARY TORKORNOO; JACQUELINE E. NGOLE, Esquire; NINA HELWIG, 

Esquire (BIA); JOHN C. MONAHAN, Esquire; JUDGE CYNTHIA 

CALLAHAN; MASTER CLARK WISOR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. 

(8:15-cv-00980-PJM)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1556 Doc: 12 Filed: 07/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing without prejudice his suit challenging Maryland 

domestic-relations proceedings for lack of subject-matter 

jurisdiction.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Torkornoo v. Torkornoo, No. 8:15-cv-00980-PJM (D. 

Md. Apr. 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * We conclude that the dismissal order is final and 

appealable. See In re GNC Corp., ___ F.3d ___, ___, 2015 WL 

3798174, at *9 n.3 (4th Cir. June 19, 2015) (discussing standard 

for determining finality of order).

Appeal: 15-1556 Doc: 12 Filed: 07/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 2