Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00648/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00648-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Magistrate Judges have authority to hear dispositive motions, such as the motion to 1

dismiss, only in cases where all parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c)(1).

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MARTA PERIERA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 10-0648 PVT

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES

TO FILE EITHER A “CONSENT TO PROCEED

BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE,” OR ELSE A “DECLINATION TO

PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR

REASSIGNMENT”

On February 23, 2010, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73-

1(a)(2), no later than five court days after that motion was filed each party was required to file either

a written consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge, or request reassignment to a District

Judge. Plaintiff has not yet done so. Therefore, based on the file herein, 1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than April 27, 2010, Plaintiff shall file either a

“Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge,” or else a “Declination to Proceed

Before a United States Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment.” Both forms are available

from the clerk of the court, or from the “Forms” section of the court’s website

(www.cand.uscourts.gov).

Dated: 4/19/10

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00648-PVT Document 13 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 1