Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_13-cv-00032/USCOURTS-azd-4_13-cv-00032-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Tort Claim

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Shari A. Lind, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Joshua Kevin Carpenter, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-13-00032-TUC-JAS

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion for a telephonic status 

conference. The motion is granted to the extent this Order should resolve any concerns 

reflected in the motion, and is denied to the extent a telephonic status conference is 

unnecessary in light of this Order. The parties have concerns with various deadlines in 

the Scheduling Order expiring prior to the resolution of discovery disputes, and the 

impact on other requirements in the Scheduling Order. As such, all deadlines in the 

Scheduling Order are stayed until after the current discovery disputes (as well as the 

motion the Government expects to file in the near future) are ruled upon by the Court. 

Within 14 days after the Court rules on the discovery disputes, the parties shall submit a 

stipulation (or motion if the parties can not reach an agreement) and proposed Order 

which will almost certainly be granted. The Court is flexible and the deadlines in the 

Scheduling Order are fluid; the parties should feel free to consult with each other and 

submit stipulations and proposed Orders adjusting the deadlines and adding any 

necessary clarification that is best for them. 

 Dated this 25th day of August, 2015. 

Honorable James A. Soto 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:13-cv-00032-JAS Document 144 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 1