Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01194/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01194-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

Sanford v. Rusty Duck, et al., Case No. CIV.S 05-1194 LKK GGH 

Stipulation to Continue the Site Inspection 

- 1 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES SANFORD, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CRAB ADDISON INC. dba 

RUSTY DUCK. 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CIV.S 05-1194 LKK GGH 

Stipulation To Continue the Rule 

34 Site Inspection and Order 

Thereon 

The parties, subject to approval of the Court, stipulate as follows: 

1. Plaintiff brought this action against Rusty Duck and the 

surrounding property, which is located at 500 Bercut Drive in Sacramento, 

California. 

2. Through Court Order, the parties previously agreed to conduct 

the Rule 34 site inspection on June 9, 2006. See Docket #13. 

3. The parties are currently negotiating settlement and feel that a 

Lynn Hubbard, III, SBN 69773 

Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV, SBN 212970 

Law Offices of Lynn Hubbard 

12 Williamsburg Lane 

Chico, CA 95926 

Telephone: (530) 895-3252 

Facsimile: (530) 894-8244 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:05-cv-01194-LKK -GGH Document 15 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 2
Sanford v. Rusty Duck, et al., Case No. CIV.S 05-1194 LKK GGH 

Stipulation to Continue the Site Inspection 

- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

continuance of the site inspection would allow the parties to further pursue 

settlement and avoid additional attorney fees and costs in the interim. 

4. The parties have agreed that the Rule 34 site inspection shall 

take place on June 30, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 

Dated: June 6, 2006 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD 

 /s/ Lynn Hubbard, Esquire 

 LYNN HUBBARD, III 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: June 6, 2006 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & 

MARMARO, LLP 

 /s/ Marty Orlick, Esquire 

 MARTIN H. ORLICK 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

CRAB ADDISON, INC. dba RUSTY 

DUCK 

Order

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, it is hereby ordered that 

the Rule 34 site inspection shall take place on June 30, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 

Dated: June 13, 2006 

 

 Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01194-LKK -GGH Document 15 Filed 06/13/06 Page 2 of 2