Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00032/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00032-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER BRILLON,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-06-0032 LKK GGH P

vs.

SUTTER COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT., et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint seeking relief

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed on April 11, 2006, plaintiff’s allegations as to

certain defendants and claims were dismissed with leave granted to file an amended complaint

within thirty days. Plaintiff failed to amend his complaint; therefore, by a concurrently filed

order, the court has found service of process appropriate for some defendants in plaintiff’s

original complaint. For the reasons set forth in the court’s order, filed on April 11, 2006, the

undersigned now recommends dismissal of certain of the named defendants and claims. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants Lt. Odem; Sgt.

Gaza; Deputies Roberts, Hunter; Helzer; Taylor; Crawford; Adams; and Freiman be dismissed

from this action, as well as the claim against defendant Mitchell, regarding the alleged attack on a

third party inmate.

Case 2:06-cv-00032-LKK -GGH Document 5 Filed 07/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 7/14/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

brill0032.fr

Case 2:06-cv-00032-LKK -GGH Document 5 Filed 07/14/06 Page 2 of 2