Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-05460/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-05460-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HORUS VISION, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

APPLIED BALLISTICS, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-05460-BLF 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT

[RE: ECF 78]

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend its complaint came on for hearing on March 26, 

2015. The Court has considered the briefing as well as the oral arguments of counsel presented at 

the hearing. Plaintiff’s motion is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), which 

directs that “[t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 

15(a)(2). There is no evidence that the motion is brought in bad faith; Plaintiff has not unduly 

delayed in bringing the motion; the motion is not futile; and there is no undue prejudice to 

Defendants. See Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962) (listing factors to be considered when 

determining if leave to amend is appropriate under Rule 15(a)). For these reasons and the reasons 

stated on the record at the hearing, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend is GRANTED. The 

amended complaint shall be filed on or before April 6, 2015 and service of process shall be 

effected upon the newly added defendant, Applied Ballistics Media, Inc., as soon as is practicable. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2015

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:13-cv-05460-BLF Document 99 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 1