Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00279/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-00279-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

YUE ZHOU, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WANG’S RESTAURANT,

Defendant.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 05-0279 PVT

INTERIM ORDER RE ADAM WANG’S

MOTION TO INTERVENE AND MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES

On September 13, 2006, attorney Adam Wang filed a motion to intervene and a motion for

attorney’s fees.1 On October 3, 2006, Defendant filed two briefs and a declaration by Eric F.

Hartman in which Defendant objects to the motion to intervene and the motion for attorneys fees on

the grounds that, among other things, they did not comply with the notice requirements of Civil

Local Rule 7-2. Defendant also objects to this court’s indication in its prior order that AdamWang

will be allowed to question the witnesses at the October 10, 2006 hearing. Having reviewed the

papers submitted by the parties, the court finds it appropriate to issue this interim order regarding the

briefing and hearing for the motion to intervene and the motion for attorneys fees. Based on the

request and the file herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions will be heard at 10:00 a.m. on October 10,

2006. While the proper procedure would have been for attorney Adam Wang to seek an order

Case 5:05-cv-00279-PVT Document 89 Filed 10/04/06 Page 1 of 3
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If Defense counsel believes he did not have time to prepare adequate opposition papers,

Defendant may file supplemental opposition papers to supply any necessary factual information or legal

authority missing from the opposition papers already filed. Any such supplemental papers shall be

electronically filed no later than noon on October 9, 2006.

ORDER, page 2

shortening time, it appears Defendant had adequate time to prepare its oppositions to the motions,2

and judicial economy is best served by hearing all of the motions on the same day.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court will determine whether or not to allow attorney

Adam Wang to question the witnesses after hearing oral argument on the motion to intervene.

Dated: 10/4/06

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:05-cv-00279-PVT Document 89 Filed 10/04/06 Page 2 of 3
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 3

copies mailed on to:

Shiao-Lin Kuo

725 Carding Drive

Sunnyvale, CA 94087 

Kurt A. Miller, Esq.

Law Office of Kurt Miller

3753 Ridgeview Court

Morgan Hill, CA 95037 

Eric F. Hartman, Esq.

Law Office of Eric F. Hartman

300 S. First Street, #210

San Jose, CA 95113 

Adam Wang, Esq.

Dal Bon & Wang

12 South First St., Ste. 613

San Jose, CA 95113 

 _______________________________

 CORINNE LEW

 Courtroom Deputy 

Case 5:05-cv-00279-PVT Document 89 Filed 10/04/06 Page 3 of 3