Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04333/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-04333-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Plaintiff(s), No. C 06-4333 PJH

v. ORDER 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, et al.,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

STATE OF NEW YORK,

No. C 06-6436 PJH

Plaintiff,

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

These matters came before the court for hearing on defendants’ administrative 

motion for an order enforcing the case management order, plaintiffs’ motions for an order

modifying the case management order so as to extend the fact discovery cutoff date, and

for further case management conference. For the reasons stated on the record the court

orders as follows:

1. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED and the states’ cross motion is DENIED. 

The July 16, 2007 fact discovery cutoff date will not be extended. However, plaintiffs may

proceed with five of the third-party depositions noticed to take place on July 13, 2007. As

two have already been taken, the three remaining depositions may be scheduled for a

mutually convenient date. 

2. New York’s motion is DENIED. The July 16, 2007 fact discovery date will not 

be continued and as none of the nineteen third-party subpoenas for documents were timely

noticed, they may not go forward.

Case 4:06-cv-04333-PJH Document 197 Filed 07/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Both New York and defendant’s shall have thirty days from July 25, 2007 to 

file any motions to compel the production of discovery, provided the discovery was the

subject of a formal discovery request prior to the cutoff date.

4. Both the states and defendants shall have thirty days from the agreed upon 

date for production to file any motions to compel the production of discovery, provided the

discovery was the subject of a formal discovery request prior to the cutoff date. Judge

Spero will set a reasonable deadline for completion of any discovery that he approves or

orders.

5. Damages discovery has not been bifurcated from fact discovery, and as

such is subject to the fact discovery cutoff date. However, discovery pertaining to the

survey has been severed from other damages discovery because of its resemblance to

expert discovery, and may proceed on the different track established by Judge Spero, who

will also define the scope of discovery to be permitted to support and/or challenge the

survey.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2007

_______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-04333-PJH Document 197 Filed 07/26/07 Page 2 of 2