Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05129/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05129-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stipulation and Order -1- CASE NO.: C 08-05129 JCS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PRIMARION, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation, INFINEON 

TECHNOLOGIES AG, a German 

Corporation, and INFINEON 

TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA 

CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 08-05129 JCS 

ORDER AND PARTIAL JUDGMENT OF 

NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT 

NO. 6,713,823 PURSUANT TO FRCP 54(b) 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

 

 On this day the parties’ Stipulation of Partial Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. 

Patent No. 6,713,823 (“`823 Patent”) Pursuant to FRCP 54(b) (“Stipulation”) was presented to 

the Court. After considering the Stipulation, the Court accepts the parties’ Stipulation and the 

rights reserved by the Parties under the Stipulation. The Court finds good cause exists and 

renders final judgment: 

Case3:08-cv-05129-JCS Document787-1 Filed04/26/10 Page1 of 2 Case 3:08-cv-05129-JCS Document 788 Filed 04/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stipulation and Order - 2 - CASE NO.: C 08-05129 JCS 

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), this Court finds that there is no just 

reason for delay and renders final judgment in favor of all Defendants that Defendants’ PX4640 

and PX 4650 products identified in Plaintiff’s First Amended Infringement Contentions served on 

July 3, 2009 do not infringe claims 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37, and 38 of the ‘823 

Patent. Although Defendants have asserted invalidity and unenforceability defenses as well as 

other defenses and counterclaims related to the ‘823 Patent, there is no need to reach these issues 

in view of the non-infringement judgment, and all counterclaims by the Defendants with regard to 

invalidity and/or enforceability of the `823 Patent and/or Defendants’ antitrust counterclaims 

related to the `823 Patent shall be dismissed without prejudice. 

 All parties shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs as to any and all matters covered 

by and/or pertaining to this Order And Partial Judgment. 

 The clerk of court shall enter final judgment in accordance herewith. 

Dated: 

JOSEPH C. SPERO 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case3:08-cv-05129-JCS Document787-1 Filed04/26/10 Page2 of 2

04/28/2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:08-cv-05129-JCS Document 788 Filed 04/28/10 Page 2 of 2