Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05380/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05380-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 196
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

556345.1 C065380 CW

 Stipulation and Order Setting Dates for Second Amended Complaint and Motion to Dismiss 

COOPER, WHITE 

& COOPER LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

201 CALIFORNIA STREET 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 

COOPER, WHITE & COOPER LLP 

WALTER W. HANSELL (SBN 114913) 

STEPHEN D. KAUS (SBN 57454) 

JIE-MING CHOU (SBN 211346) 

201 California Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 433-1900 

Facsimile: (415) 433-5530 

whansell@cwclaw.com 

skaus@cwclaw.com 

jchou@cwclaw.com 

Attorneys for defendants COMCAST 

CORPORATION, and COMCAST OF 

CALIFORNIA/COLORADO, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

CITY OF OAKLAND, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST 

OF CALIFORNIA/COLORADO, LLC and 

DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 CASE NO. C065380 CW 

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING 

DATES FOR SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO 

DISMISS SCHEDULE 

Plaintiff City of Oakland and Defendants Comcast Corporation and Comcast of 

California/Colorado, LLC, pursuant to Local Rules 6.1(b) and 6.2, hereby stipulate to the 

following schedule and request a modification of the schedule set forth in the Court's February 14, 

2007 order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss ("Order"). 

1. Whereas, the Court's Order had instructed Plaintiff to file its Second Amended 

Complaint within fourteen days from the date of the Order, for Defendants to file their response 

within twenty days, and for Defendants to notice its potential motion to dismiss for April 13, 2007, 

at which time the Court would also hold the initial case management conference. 

Case 4:06-cv-05380-CW Document 47 Filed 02/28/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

556345.1 2 C065380 CW

Stipulation and Order Setting Dates for Second Amended Complaint and Motion to Dismiss 

COOPER, WHITE 

& COOPER LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

201 CALIFORNIA STREET 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 

2. Whereas, since the Court's Order was issued on February 14, 2007, the parties 

cannot meet the April 13, 2007 hearing and case management deadline mandated in the Court's 

Order as Local Civil Rule 7.2(a) requires that all motions be noticed at least thirty five days before 

the hearing date. Added to the fourteen days for Plaintiff to file their Second Amended Complaint 

and the twenty days for Defendants to file a response, the earliest hearing date would be April 27, 

2007. 

3. Whereas, Plaintiff has requested that Defendants grant a five day extension for 

Plaintiff to file its second amended complaint because Plaintiff's lead counsel, Izetta Jackson, has 

been called away from work to testify as a trial witness in the case of Naidu v. California Public 

Utilities Commission, San Francisco Superior Court Case No. 05-444782. Consequently, Ms. 

Jackson needs the additional five days in order to draft and prepare the amended complaint once 

she has concluded her testimony. 

4. Therefore, the parties request a one week extension past the April 27, 2007 hearing 

date to May 4, 2007 and stipulate to the following revised schedule: 

a. The Second Amended Complaint shall be filed on or before March 5, 2007. 

b. Defendants' answer or Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint 

shall be filed on or before March 26, 2007. 

c. Plaintiff's opposition brief shall be filed on or before April 9, 2007. 

d. Defendants' reply brief shall be filed on or before April 20, 2007. 

e. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss shall be held on May 4, 2007 at 1:30 

p.m. 

f. The initial case management conference shall also be held on May 4, 2007 

at 1:30 p.m. consistent with the Court's Order that the hearing on any potential motion to 

dismiss be held on the same day and time as the initial case management conference. 

5. This schedule, combined with the rescheduling of the initial case management 

conference, will not affect any other scheduled dates. 

Case 4:06-cv-05380-CW Document 47 Filed 02/28/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

556345.1 3 C065380 CW

Stipulation and Order Setting Dates for Second Amended Complaint and Motion to Dismiss 

COOPER, WHITE 

& COOPER LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

201 CALIFORNIA STREET 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 

DATED: February ___, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 

COOPER, WHITE & COOPER LLP 

 By: 

 Jie-Ming Chou 

Attorneys for defendants COMCAST 

CORPORATION, and COMCAST OF 

CALIFORNIA/COLORADO, LLC 

DATED: February ___, 2007 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, CITY OF 

OAKLAND 

 By: 

 Mark T. Morodomi 

Supervising Trial Attorney 

Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY OF OAKLAND 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 2/28 

Dated: __________________________, 2007 

 _____________________________________ 

 The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Judge 

Case 4:06-cv-05380-CW Document 47 Filed 02/28/07 Page 3 of 3