Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01334/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01334-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING TRIAL

CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-01334-CRB (NC)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

DARYL S. LANDY, State Bar No. 136288

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

One Market, Spear Street Tower

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126

Tel: 415.442.1000

Fax: 415.442.1001

Email: dlandy@morganlewis.com

MICHAEL J. PUMA (admitted pro hac vice)

BRANDON BRIGHAM (admitted pro hac vice)

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

1701 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Tel: 215.963.5000

Fax: 215.963.5001

Email: mpuma@morganlewis.com

bbrigham@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant

THE HERSHEY COMPANY

THE BRANDI LAW FIRM

THOMAS J. BRANDI, SBN 53208

BRIAN J. MALLOY, SBN 234882

354 Pine Street, Third Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415.989.1800; 

Facsimile: 415.707.2024

E-mail: tjb@brandilaw.com

HOBAN & FEOLA, LLC

DAVID C. FEOLA (CO Bar No. 18789)

(admitted pro hac vice)

1626 Wazee Street, Suite 2A

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: 303.674.7000; 

Facsimile: 303.382.4685

E-mail: David @Feolalaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GREGORY P. BARNES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

THE HERSHEY COMPANY,

 

Defendant.

Case No. 12-cv-01334-CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL 

Defendant The Hershey Company (“Hershey”) and Plaintiffs (collectively, the “Parties”), 

by and through their respective counsel, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2, 7-12, and 40-1 of the 

Northern District of California, jointly request an order continuing trial, and aver as follows:

WHEREAS on June 10, 2015, the Court set a trial date of January 19, 2016 and a pretrial 

conference for January 7, 2016, ECF 275;

WHEREAS on September 25, 2015, Hershey filed two Motions for Partial Summary

Case 3:12-cv-01334-CRB Document 329 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING TRIAL

CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-01334-CRB (NC)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Judgment seeking to prevent Plaintiffs from utilizing a pattern or practice method of proof and 

dismissal of all claims brought by Plaintiffs Gregory Barnes, David Bolle, and Jerry Chapman

(collectively, the “Motions”), ECF 288 & 289;

WHEREAS, the Motions remain pending and a hearing is set for December 18, 2015, 

ECF 323;

WHEREAS, based on the current pre-trial schedule, the Parties must serve motions in 

limine the day of the hearing on the Motions and submit their other pre-trial filings less than two 

weeks later, which would require the Parties to draft pre-trial filings and prepare for trial without 

knowing the scope of trial;

WHEREAS, the Court is unavailable on January 7, 2015, the prior date set for the final 

pretrial conference;

WHEREAS, the Parties seek a continuance of trial in order to conserve the resources of 

the Court and the Parties, as well as to obtain a ruling on any motions in advance of trial and 

related pre-trial deadlines, and the Parties do not seek this continuance for the purpose of delay;

WHEREAS, all parties and their counsel are available for trial during the weeks of 

February 22, 2016 and February 29, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that this Stipulation and the fact of entering into this 

Stipulation is without prejudice to any rights, position or arguments the Parties may make in this 

Action and that nothing in this Stipulation or the fact of entering into this Stipulation shall be 

construed as an admission by either Party or otherwise prejudice either Party’s position in any

further litigation;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and 40-1 by and between the 

Parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record, to the extension of certain deadlines as

follows:

Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline

Final Pretrial Conference January 7, 2016 February 11, 2016

Trial to Commence January 19, 2016 February 22, 2016

Case 3:12-cv-01334-CRB Document 329 Filed 12/08/15 Page 2 of 3
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING TRIAL

CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-01334-CRB (NC)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Brandon J. Brigham, attest that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I 

declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing 

is true and correct. Executed this 4th day of December, 2015.

/s/ Brandon J. Brigham

Brandon J. Brigham

Dated: December 4, 2015 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

By: /s/ Brandon J. Brigham 

Brandon J. Brigham

Attorneys for Defendant

THE HERSHEY COMPANY

Dated: December 4, 2015 THE BRANDI LAW FIRM

By: /s/ Brian J. Malloy

Brian J. Malloy

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December __, 2015

By:

Honorable Charles R. Breyer

United States District Judge

8

Case 3:12-cv-01334-CRB Document 329 Filed 12/08/15 Page 3 of 3