Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-03526/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-03526-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

WALID S. ARDIJL-RAHIM (State Bar No. 141 940) 

J. SCOTT PAISLEY, (Stare Bar NO. 094236 

AT&'I' SEKVIC'E, INC. LEGAL, DEPARTMENT 

525 Market Street. Suite 2005 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (4 15) 778- 1 356 

Facsimile: (4 15) 882-4458 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Pacific Bell Telephone Company 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

JOE-JN M. HIGI)ON, et al., / Case No. (208-03526 

Plaintiff, 

vs. COMPANY'S MOTION 

PLAINTIFF'S FOURTH 

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY dba QMPLAINT AND 

AT&T CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, 

et a1 

Defetldant . 

Hearing Date: March 1 8, 20 10 

ew Hearing Date: April 1, 2010 

1 :30 p.m. 

Pacific Re11 Telephone Company's current deadline to file its reply bricf in regard to its 

Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint and Motiorl to Strike Improper 

Allegations is March 4,2010. Due to an unexpected family emergency of co-counsel, and 

counsel being currently out of town, Pacific Bell 'Telephone Company is unable to tile its reply 

brief in a timely manner. Therefore. Pacific Bell Telephone Cornpany and Plaintiff stipulate to 

moving rhe hearing date on the lLZntion to April 1, 2010 at 1 :30 p.m. Pacific Bell Telephone 7 7 L I 

Company and Plaintiff further stipulate that Pacific Bell Telephone Company's rcpty bricf must 

28 

*E-Filed 03/02/2010*

Case 5:08-cv-03526-RS Document 75 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 2
03/02/2010

Case 5:08-cv-03526-RS Document 75 Filed 03/02/10 Page 2 of 2