Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01335/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-01335-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES HALSEY

Plaintiff(s),

V.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK

Dated: May 21, 2008

Datedt ,fh',,/A I

CASE NO. 3:08-cv-0 I 335-EMC

STTPULATTON AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTTNG ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s).

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. t6-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

,/ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Purties who helieve lhat an early seltlentent conference wilh a Magistrale Judge is

appreciably more likely to meet lheir needs than any otherform of ADR, must participate in an

ADR phone conference and moy not Jile this fornr. They must instead ./ile a Notice of Neetl Jbr

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule l6-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

Private ADR Qtlease identifu process and provider)

The parties agrge to hold the ADR session by:

the presumptive deadline (The deutlline is 90 days from the date oJ'the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ortlere,d. )

{ other requested deadline october 10,2008

,- r-.' t-*a.' (--; i/ { 

'

".- l< i\-t =-

Attorney for Plaintiff

..*-'->

7o'-it.f* t l'tf_

Attorney for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Jeffrey S. White

Case 3:08-cv-01335-JSW Document 12 Filed 06/05/08 Page 1 of 1