Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-00731/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-00731-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- 08cv0731

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIA R. METCALF,et al.,

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 08-CV-00731 W POR

ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC

NO. 66)

vs.

DREXEL LENDING GROUP, et al.,

Defendants.

On October 29, 2008, this Court issued an order granting Defendants’ motions

to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (the “Dismissal Order”). (See Doc. No. 61.)

On November 20, 2008, Plaintiff Maria Metcalf and Dennis Gray filed a motion for

reconsideration of the Dismissal Order. (See Doc. No. 66). On November 24, 2008,

Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. (See Doc. No. 67.) In light of the filing

//

//

//

//

Case 3:08-cv-00731-W-POR Document 71 Filed 12/10/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Chambers Rules provide that “No motion for reconsideration shall be filed

without leave of court.” (See Chamber Rules, p.3.) Plaintiff also failed to comply with this Chambers Rule.

-2- 08cv0731

of the SAC, the motion for reconsideration is now moot. According, the motion is

DENIED as moot.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 10, 2008

Hon. Thomas J. Whelan

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-00731-W-POR Document 71 Filed 12/10/08 Page 2 of 2