Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00126/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00126-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

32

ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO AMEND PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT -

CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00126-LJO-BAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IRINA ENGERT, ANNE ENGERT, and RON 

ENGERT, Individually and as Successors-InInterest to Glendon Engert,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STANISLAUS COUNTY; SHERIFF ADAM 

CHRISTIANSON; ROBERT LEE PARIS, SR. 

AND ELIZABETH JANE PARIS, PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVES TO THE ESTATE OF 

DEPUTY SHERIFF ROBERT LEE PARIS, JR.; 

DEPUTY MICHAEL GLINKSKAS; 

SERGEANT MANUAL MARTINEZ;

LIEUTENANT CLIFF HARPER; RT 

FINANCIAL, INC.; RONI ROBERTS and 

DOES ONE through TWENTY-FIVE, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-CV-00126-LJO-BAM

ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE 

APPLICATION TO AMEND 

PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

The Joint Application for leave of the Court for plaintiffs to file their Second Amended 

Complaint was reviewed without hearing. After consideration of the Ex Parte Application papers, 

and all other matters presented to the Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Ex Parte 

Application for leave of the Court for plaintiffs to file their Second Amended Complaint, attached 

to the Declaration of Richard H. Schoenberger as Exhibit A, is GRANTED. The Court further 

orders as follows:

Case 1:13-cv-00126-LJO-BAM Document 36 Filed 10/22/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

31

32

2

ORDER GRANTING JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION TO AMEND PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT -

CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00126-LJO-BAM

LAW OFFICES OF

WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY 

& SCHOENBERGER

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

650 CALIFORNIA STREET

26TH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108

(415) 981-7210

That, for purposes of plaintiffs Creditors’ Claims and the rejection thereof only, the 

Second Amended Complaint is deemed to have been filed after May 6, 2013 and 

before August 2, 2013.

That the prior stipulation between the parties (“Stipulation Re Paragraph 8 of 

Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint”), filed on August 2, 2013, is withdrawn.

That there is no need for additional responsive pleadings to be filed by the 

defendants following the filing of plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint, as all 

prior allegations made by defendants in their responsive pleadings will be deemed 

responsive to the Second Amended Complaint.

Plaintiffs shall file their Second Amended Complaint on or before October 25, 

2013. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 22, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00126-LJO-BAM Document 36 Filed 10/22/13 Page 2 of 2