Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01142/USCOURTS-caed-1_19-cv-01142-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES L. DAVIS, 

Plaintiff,

 v.

DEPARTMENT OF ADULT PAROLE 

OPPERATIONS HANFORD,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:19-cv-01142-DAD-EPG (PC)

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW 

CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE 

SANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO 

APPEAR, FAILURE TO PROVIDE INITIAL 

DISCLOSURES, AND FAILURE TO FILE 

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

STATEMENT

14-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff, Charles L. Davis, is proceeding pro se in this action. The address of record for 

Plaintiff indicates that he is no longer incarcerated.

On February 10, 2020, the Court issued an Order Setting An Initial Scheduling 

Conference And Requiring Initial Disclosures And Scheduling Conference Statements. (ECF

No. 21.) This order set an Initial Scheduling Conference for May 13, 2020, at 1:30 p.m., and 

noted that attendance at the Initial Scheduling Conference was mandatory. (Id.) The order 

granted the parties leave to appear at the conference by phone and provided instructions on how 

to do so. (Id. at 2.) The order also required that the parties make their initial disclosures at least 

thirty days prior to the Initial Scheduling Conference and file a scheduling conference 

statement at least two weeks before the Initial Scheduling Conference. (Id. at 2-4.) The order 

was served on Plaintiff by U.S. mail at his address of record. 

Case 1:19-cv-01142-DAD-EPG Document 26 Filed 05/13/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The mandatory Initial Scheduling Conference was held on May 13, 2020, at 1:30 p.m.

as scheduled. Byron Miller appeared for Defendant. Plaintiff failed to appear. Plaintiff also 

failed to file a scheduling conference statement, and according to Counsel for Defendant, 

Plaintiff had not made his initial disclosures.

Accordingly, Plaintiff IS ORDERED to show cause why he should not be sanctioned up 

to and including dismissal of this action for failing to appear at the Initial Scheduling 

Conference, for failing to file a scheduling conference statement, and for failing to make initial 

disclosures. Plaintiff shall file a written show cause response within 14 days of the date of this 

Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 13, 2020 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:19-cv-01142-DAD-EPG Document 26 Filed 05/13/20 Page 2 of 2