Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_17-cv-00520/USCOURTS-caed-1_17-cv-00520-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On January 14, 2020, the Court’s order on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was 

docketed. See Doc. No. 61. However, it has come to the Court’s attention that there are 

typographical errors with respect to the title this order. Specifically, the title of order appears as 

“Order On Defendants’ Third Motion To Dismiss” and then references “(Doc. No. 33)”. See id. 

However, the body of the order addresses and resolves Defendant’s summary judgment motion. 

See id. In order to avoid possible confusion, the Court will issue this order to correct Doc. No. 61 

nunc pro tunc to reflect that it is the “Order On Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment,” 

which is Doc. No. 53 in the record.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Document No. 61 on Page 1 at the title is CORRECTED NUNC PRO TUNC to now 

read: “Order On Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment”; and

2. Document No. 61 on Page 1 in the title, where “(Doc. No. 33)” is identified, is 

CORRECTED NUNC PRO TUNC to read “(Doc. No. 53).”

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 15, 2020 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

JAMES JACK, JR.,

Plaintiff

v.

STANISLAUS COUNTY DEPUTY

SHERIFF ERIC PEARSON,

Defendant

CASE NO. 1:17-CV-0520 AWI SAB 

ORDER CORRECTING DOC. NO. 61 

NUNC PRO TUNC

(Doc. No. 61)

Case 1:17-cv-00520-AWI-SAB Document 63 Filed 01/16/20 Page 1 of 1