Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-00995/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-00995-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 540
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K:\COMMON\CHMB_Hayes\SIGNED ORDERS\CORRECTED ORDER - 10cv995 - Bravo Mendoza - Denying IFP from Pro Se.wpd, 62810 -1- 10cv0995

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUADALUPE BRAVO-MENDOZA, Civil No. 10-0995 WQH (POR)

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING IN FORMA

PAUPERIS APPLICATION AND

DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Respondent.

On May 6, 2010, Petitioner, a detainee in the custody of the Santa Ana jail in Orange

County, California, proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241. On May 19, 2010, this Court dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to

satisfy the filing fee requirement. (See Order filed May 19, 2010 [Doc. No. 3]). In its May 19,

2010 Order, the Court informed Petitioner that, in order to have his case reopened he must either

pay the filing fee or provide adequate proof of his inability to pay by July 12, 2010. (Id.)

On June 11, 2010, Petitioner filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. According

to the Prison Certificate and trust account statement, Petitioner has $20.09 on account at the

institution in which he is confined. It appears Petitioner can afford the $5.00 filing fee.

Accordingly, the Court DENIES the request to proceed in forma pauperis, and DISMISSES the

case without prejudice. To have the case reopened, Petitioner must, no later than August 8,

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:10-cv-00995-WQH-POR Document 4 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K:\COMMON\CHMB_Hayes\SIGNED ORDERS\CORRECTED ORDER - 10cv995 - Bravo Mendoza - Denying IFP from Pro Se.wpd, 62810 -2- 10cv0995

2010 provide the Court with: (1) a copy of this Order together with the $5.00 filing fee; or (2) a

copy of this Order together with adequate proof that Petitioner cannot pay the $5.00 filing fee.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 28, 2010

WILLIAM Q. HAYES

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-00995-WQH-POR Document 4 Filed 06/28/10 Page 2 of 2