Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06105/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06105-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re: ALEXIS MAGER LAKUSTA,

Debtor.

__________________________________/

ALEXIS MAGER LAKUSTA.,

Plaintiff/Appellant, No. C 06-6105 PJH/

Adv. Case No. 03-3549 TC

v. ORDER TRANSMITTING

DEBTOR’S OSC RESPONSE TO

BANKRUPTCY COURT CLERK;

INQUIRY RE: TRANSMITTAL OF

RECORD ON APPEAL

MARK EVANS, et al,

Defendants/Appellees.

_________________________________/

Because it appeared to this court that debtor Alexis Mager Lakusta (“Lakusta”) had

failed to designate the record and the issues on appeal in accordance with Federal Rule of

Bankruptcy Procedure (“FRBP”) 8006, this court issued an order to show cause on March

21, 2007 and directed Lakusta to respond regarding why his appeal should not be

dismissed for a failure to prosecute. On April 2, 2007, Lakusta filed a response with this

court. In that response, Lakusta asserts that he did designate the record and issues in

conjunction with this appeal, which concerns only the bankruptcy court’s September 8,

2006 order in adversary case no. 03-3549 TC (Chapter 7 case no. 02-31521 STC)

declaring him a vexatious litigant and enjoining certain future proceedings. Lakusta

attached to his response a copy of the designation filed with the bankruptcy court on

September 28, 2006.

Case 4:06-cv-06105-PJH Document 10 Filed 04/11/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

To date, the clerk of this court has not received from the clerk of the bankruptcy

court the record, as designated by appellee Evans in the designation he filed with the

bankruptcy court on December 8, 2006; nor as appellant Lakusta contends he designated

with the bankruptcy court on September 28, 2006.

The court has attached copies of its March 21, 2007 order to show cause and

Lakusta’s subsequent April 2, 2007 response for the bankruptcy court’s reference. Based

on the bankruptcy court docket and the documents before it, it appears to this court that the

parties have filed the requisite documents pursuant to FRBP 8006, such that transmittal of

the record to this court should occur. If that is the case, then the court requests that the

bankruptcy court clerk transmit the record to the clerk of this court. If that is not the case,

then the bankruptcy court clerk is requested to inform this court otherwise.

 Dated: April 11, 2007

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-06105-PJH Document 10 Filed 04/11/07 Page 2 of 2