Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-01290/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-01290-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

---

1

Case No.: 5:13-cv-01290-EJD

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

LYNN BRIDGES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOHN ARNOLD GERINGER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:13-cv-01290-EJD 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

On June 10, 2015, the court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause in writing by June 16, 2015,

why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute after Plaintiffs failed to file an 

amended complaint. See Docket Item No. 87. In response, Plaintiffs have indicated they intend to 

pursue alternative litigation in state court and do not intend to file an amended complaint. See

Docket Item No. 88. 

Accordingly, the claim for violation of Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 

U.S.C. §77l(a)(2), is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(b). Consistent with the order addressing the motion to dismiss, the remaining claims 

are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Freeman v. 

Oakland Unified Sch. Dist., 179 F.3d 846, 847 (9th Cir. 1999) (“Dismissals for lack of jurisdiction 

‘should be . . . without prejudice so that a plaintiff may reassert his claims in a competent

court.’”). The Clerk shall close this file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 17, 2015

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:13-cv-01290-EJD Document 90 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 1