Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01685/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-01685-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

David Ryan Groshong, )

)

Plaintiff, ) No. CV-06-1685 PHX PGR (DKD)

)

vs. )

) ORDER

Joseph M. Arpaio, )

)

Defendant. ) )

On July 25, 2006, the plaintiff filed a document (doc. #3) asking that he be

allowed to withdraw his complaint and that this action be dismissed so that he

can later submit a new complaint after re-evaluating the evidence. The Clerk of

the Court docketed the plaintiff's document as a motion to withdraw the

complaint. The Court finds that the document is more properly construed as a

notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)

since no answer or motion for summary judgment as been served in this action. 

So construed, the plaintiff's notice automatically terminates this action without any

court order being either necessary or proper. See Concha v. London, 62 F.3d

1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's document filed on July 25, 2006 (doc.

Case 2:06-cv-01685-PGR--DKD Document 4 Filed 08/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

#3) shall be construed as a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice

pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1). The Clerk of the Court shall accordingly

terminate this action.

DATED this 22nd day of August, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-01685-PGR--DKD Document 4 Filed 08/23/06 Page 2 of 2