Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02316/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02316-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY DEAN DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-2316 KJM CKD

ORDER

Plaintiff’s motions to compel came on regularly for hearing on December 17, 2014. 

Raeon Roulston appeared telephonically for plaintiff. Sarah Schienhorn appeared telephonically 

for the Midland defendants. Erica Brachfeld appeared telephonically for the Brachfeld 

defendants. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the 

arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS 

FOLLOWS:

1. The motion to compel discovery from the Brachfeld defendants (ECF No. 47) is 

granted in part. No later than December 31, 2014:

a. Defendant Erica Brachfeld shall provide unredacted versions of the 21 

documents previously produced, subject to the protective order previously entered in this action; 

provide a supplemental response to requests for production of documents nos. 6, 8, 9, 10, 20, 21, 

22, 23 stating that all documents responsive to these requests have been produced; and provide an 

Case 2:13-cv-02316-KJM-CKD Document 57 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

unqualified admission or denial to request for admission no. 3. 

2. The motion to compel discovery from the Midland defendants (ECF No. 46) is granted 

in part. No later than December 31, 2014, the Midland defendants shall:

a. Provide supplemental responses to interrogatories nos. 6 and 8 as agreed in the 

joint statement and to interrogatory no. 12, as limited by plaintiff in the joint statement;

b. Provide a supplemental response to requests for production of documents nos. 

10, 11 and 26-31 stating that all documents responsive to these requests have been produced; 

c. Provide a supplemental production to request for production nos. 12-23, as 

limited by plaintiff in the joint statement;

d. Provide an unqualified admission or denial requests for admission nos. 

3 and 4;

e. Produce for in camera review in bate-stamped format the Purchase and Sale 

Agreement relevant to this action. 

Dated: December 18, 2014

4 davis-midland.oah

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:13-cv-02316-KJM-CKD Document 57 Filed 12/18/14 Page 2 of 2