Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02087/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02087-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IRIS GONZALEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-02087-MMC 

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO 

SUBMIT SINGLE-SIDED CHAMBERS 

COPIES OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND 

SUPPORTING PAPERS IN 

COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL 

RULES AND COURT'S STANDING 

ORDERS

On September 23, 2016, defendants Mazda Motor Corporation and Mazda Motor 

of America, Inc. electronically filed their “Motion to Dismiss Claims Alleged in First 

Amended Complaint.” Defendants violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the 

Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing to provide a chambers copy of the 

declaration of Darlene M. Cho filed in support of said motion. See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7) 

(requiring parties “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is 

electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’”); see also Standing Orders For Civil 

Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2. 

Moreover, none of the chambers copies defendants did submit are in single-sided 

format. See Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. 

Chesney ¶ 2; Civil L.R. 3-4 (setting forth requirements for “papers presented for filing”); 

Civil L.R. 3-4(c)(2) (providing “text must appear on one side only”).

Defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with the Civil Local Rules and the 

Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting single-sided chambers copies of the

following documents: (1) “Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Claims 

Alleged in First Amended Complaint;” (2) “Memorandum of Points and Authorities in 

Case 3:16-cv-02087-MMC Document 32 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Claims Alleged in the First Complaint;” (3) 

“Declaration of Darlene M. Cho in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Claims 

Alleged in First Amended Complaint;” and (4) “[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss Claims Alleged in First Amended Complaint.” 

Defendants are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply with the Civil 

Local Rules and the Court's Standing Orders to provide a single-sided chambers copy of 

each electronically filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not 

limited to, striking from the record any electronically filed document for which a chambers 

copy has not been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 27, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-02087-MMC Document 32 Filed 09/27/16 Page 2 of 2