Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00247/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-00247-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -1- Stipulation Re: Response to the Complaint 

 No. C07 00247 JF 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

VERNON H. GRANNEMAN (SBN 083532) 

 Email: vernon.granneman@pillsburylaw.com 

DIANNE L. SWEENEY (SBN 187198) 

 Email: dianne.sweeney@pillsburylaw.com 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1114 

Telephone: (650) 233-4500 

Facsimile: (650) 233-4545 

OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP 

GARY HANSEN (pro hac vice application pending) 

 Email: ghansen@oppenheimer.com 

HEATHER N. HOECKE (pro hac vice application pending) 

 Email: hhoecke@oppenheimer.com 

45 South Seventh Street, Suite 3300 

Minneapolis, MN 55402 

Telephone: (612) 607-7000 

Facsimile: (612) 607-7100 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Laserscope and American Medical Systems, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

DAVANZIA, S.L., a Spanish corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

LASERSCOPE, INC., a California 

corporation, and AMERICAN MEDICAL 

SYSTEMS, INC., a Minnesota corporation, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C07 00247 JF 

STIPULATION RE: TIME TO 

RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 

AND FILE RULE 12 MOTION 

PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2; AND 

DATE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Courtroom: 3 

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

 

*efiled 3/7/07

Case 5:07-cv-00247-JF Document 17 Filed 03/07/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -2- Stipulation Re: Response to the Complaint 

 No. C07 00247 JF 

Plaintiff Davanzia, S.L. (“plaintiff”) and Defendants Laserscope (incorrectly sued 

herein as “Laserscope, Inc.”) and American Medical Systems, Inc. (“defendants”), by and 

through their counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 

RECITALS 

1. Plaintiff served the First Amended Complaint on Defendants on February 6, 

2007 and Defendants’ Answer is due on February 26, 2007. 

2. Defendants intend to file a Rule 12 motion in response to the First Amended 

Complaint and have scheduled a Rule 12 motion for hearing on April 27, 2007. The 

plaintiff has agreed to this hearing date. The parties have further agreed on a briefing 

schedule for this motion and said schedule complies with the requirements set forth under 

Civil L.R. 7-2 and 7-3. 

3. While the Defendants anticipate that their motion will go to the bulk of 

Plaintiff’s claims, the parties have agreed that to the extent any claim or any portion of any 

claim is not covered by the Rule 12 motion, no Answer needs to be filed by Defendants at 

this time. The Defendants have agreed to file an Answer, Counterclaim and/or any other 

response allowed under the rules to any remaining claims within ten (10) court days after 

the efiling of this Court’s ruling on its Rule 12 motion. 

4. The parties have also agreed to ask this Court to reset the Case Management 

Conference, originally scheduled for April 20, 2007, so that it will coincide with the 

hearing date for the Rule 12 motion. 

STIPULATION 

NOW THEREFORE, all parties, through their respective counsel of record, agree 

and stipulate to the following schedule, subject to the Court’s approval: 

1. March 12, 2007: Defendants to e-file its Rule 12 motion. 

2. April 3, 2007: Plaintiff to e-file opposition to the Rule 12 motion. 

3. April 10, 2007: Defendants to e-file reply in support of its Rule 12 motion. 

Case 5:07-cv-00247-JF Document 17 Filed 03/07/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -3- Stipulation Re: Response to the Complaint 

 No. C07 00247 JF 

4. April 27, 2007, 9:00 a.m.: Oral argument on the Rule 12 motion and Case 

 Management Conference. 

Dated: February 27, 2007. PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

VERNON H. GRANNEMAN 

DIANNE L. SWEENEY 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

By /s/ Dianne L. Sweeney 

Dianne L. Sweeney 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LASERSCOPE AND 

AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. 

Dated: February 27, 2007. OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP 

GARY HANSEN (pro hac vice application pending) 

HEATHER N. HOECKE (pro hac vice application pending) 

45 South Seventh Street, Suite 3300 

Minneapolis, MN 55402 

By /s/ Heather N. Hoecke 

Heather N. Hoecke 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LASERSCOPE AND 

AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. 

Dated: February 27, 2007. DLA PIPER US LLP 

BILL FRIMEL 

MARGARET CRAWFORD 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 

By /s/ Bill Frimel 

Bill Frimel 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DAVANZIA, S.L. 

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45, § X.B 

Case 5:07-cv-00247-JF Document 17 Filed 03/07/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -4- Stipulation Re: Response to the Complaint 

 No. C07 00247 JF 

I, DIANNE L. SWEENEY, hereby declare pursuant to General Order 45, § X.B, 

that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from each of the other 

signatories listed above. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing declaration is true and correct. 

Executed on February 27, 2007, at Palo Alto, California. 

 /s/ Dianne L. Sweeney 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February _____, 2007. 

 

 Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

 United States District Judge 

---------------------------

March 2, 2007

Case 5:07-cv-00247-JF Document 17 Filed 03/07/07 Page 4 of 4