Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-05200/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-05200-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING 

PENSION TRUST FUND BOARD OF 

TRUSTEES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MICHAEL’S FLOOR COVERING, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 11-cv-05200-JSC 

ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’

OPPOSITION BRIEF UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 165

Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to file their opposition to Defendant’s motion for 

summary judgment under seal is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. No. 165.) Plaintiffs filed 

the motion to seal because the brief includes references to information that Defendant previously 

designated as confidential under the parties’ stipulated protective order. Under Civil Local Rule 

79-5(e), Defendant, as the party who designated the material sought to be sealed as confidential, 

had four days to file a declaration in accordance with Rule 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that the 

material was properly sealable. See also Civ. L.R. 79-5(b) (defining sealable information as 

“privileged, protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law”). 

Defendant has not filed such a declaration and the time to do so has run. Accordingly, the 

administrative motion to seal is DENIED and Plaintiffs shall file their opposition brief on the 

public docket as specified in Rule 79-5(e)(2).

This Order disposes of Docket No. 165.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 8, 2016

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:11-cv-05200-JSC Document 167 Filed 06/08/16 Page 1 of 1