Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01986/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01986-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Armand Florez,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 01-1986 LKK PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

California Department

of Corrections, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a prisoner without counsel prosecuting a civil

rights action against defendant Clendenin pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment.

A party may move, without or without supporting affidavits,

for a summary judgment and the judgment sought shall be rendered

forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to

interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the

affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any

material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment

Case 2:01-cv-01986-LKK -PAN Document 114 Filed 04/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)-(c). A motion for

summary judgment, 

shall be accompanied by a “Statement of Undisputed

Facts” that shall enumerate discretely each of the

specific material facts relied upon in support of the

motion and cite the particular portions of any

pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory answer,

admission or other document relied upon to establish

that fact.

Local Rule 56-260. Plaintiff did not submit a Statement of

Undisputed Facts.

I therefore recommend plaintiff’s February 7, 2005, motion

be denied without prejudice.

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: April 19, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:01-cv-01986-LKK -PAN Document 114 Filed 04/20/05 Page 2 of 2