Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00650/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-00650-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID MARSHALL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SEAN ARMACHER, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:16-cv-0650 MCE AC (PS) 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 

undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On August 12, 2016, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. 

ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion. 

 Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed 

fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Local Rule further provides that “[n]o 

party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition 

to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 230(j) provides 

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in 

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be 

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 

inherent power of the Court.” 

//// 

Case 2:16-cv-00650-MCE-AC Document 5 Filed 09/02/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The hearing date of September 14, 2016 is CONTINUED to October 5, 2016 at 

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 26; 

2. Plaintiff shall file an opposition – or a Statement of Non-Opposition – to the 

motion to dismiss, no later than September 21, 2016. Failure to file an opposition 

or to appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and 

shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 

3. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, initially scheduled for September 7, 

2016, is CONTINUED to December 7, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 26. 

DATED: September 1, 2016 

Case 2:16-cv-00650-MCE-AC Document 5 Filed 09/02/16 Page 2 of 2