Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-03024/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-03024-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEANGELEO ANTOINE HUGHES,

Petitioner, 2: 10 - cv - 3024 WBS TJB

vs.

JAMES WALKER, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner who is now proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 3, 2011, Petitioner’s motion to stay and

abey was entered by the Clerk’s Office. Local Rule 230(l) sets forth the requisite procedure for

motion practice in prisoner actions in which the prisoner is proceeding pro se. Specifically,

Local Rule 230(l) states that:

Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be served

and filed by the responding party not more than twenty-one (21),

days after the date of service of the motion. A responding party

who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and

file a statement to that effect, specifically designating the motion in

question. Failure of the responding party to file an opposition or

to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any

opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the

imposition of sanctions.

E.D. Cal. R. 230(l) (emphasis added). To date, Respondent has neither filed a response to

1

Case 2:10-cv-03024-WBS-GGH Document 24 Filed 10/26/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Petitioner’s motion to stay nor filed a statement of non-opposition.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent shall file either: (1) a

response to Petitioner’s motion to stay; or (2) a statement of non-opposition to the motion to stay,

on or before November 4, 2011. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition

of sanctions. 

DATED: October 26, 2011

TIMOTHY J BOMMER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 2:10-cv-03024-WBS-GGH Document 24 Filed 10/26/11 Page 2 of 2