Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04592/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04592-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 15:77 Securities Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SETTING SCHEDULE 

MASTER FILE NO. CV 06-4592 JF

SCHIFFRIN BARROWAY 

 TOPAZ & KESSLER, LLP 

Nichole T. Browning 

2125 Oak Grove Road, Suite 120 

Walnut Creek, California 94598 

Telephone: (925) 945-0770 

Facsimile: (925) 945-8792 

nbrowning@sbtklaw.com 

-andEric L. Zagar (Bar No. 250519) 

Tara P. Kao 

280 King of Prussia Road 

Radnor, PA 19087 

Telephone: (610) 667-7706 

Facsimile: (610) 667-7056 

ezagar@sbtklaw.com 

tkao@sbtklaw.com 

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

(Additional Counsel on signature page) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re ATMEL CORPORATION DERIVATIVE 

LITIGATION 

________________________________________ 

This Document Related To: 

All Actions 

Master File No. CV 06-4592-JF 

DERIVATIVE ACTION

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING HEARING ON 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND 

SETTING SCHEDULE 

Assigned to Judge Jeremy Fogel 

Courtroom 3, 5th Floor 

**E-filed 12/5/07** ----------------

Case 5:06-cv-04592-JF Document 124 Filed 12/05/07 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SETTING SCHEDULE 

MASTER FILE NO. CV 06-4592 JF

1

WHEREAS, plaintiffs James Juengling, Kenneth Kelley, Randel Smith and Anthony A. 

Noble (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed a consolidated complaint on November 3, 2006 against 

defendants Gust Perlegos, Tsung-Ching Wu, Kris Chellam, Jack Peckham, Donald Colvin, Mikes 

Sisois, B. Jeffrey Katz, Francis Barton, Graham Turner, Bernard Pruniaux, Steven Schumann, George 

Perlegos, T. Peter Thomas, Chaiho Kim, Pierre Fougere, Norman Hall, David Sugishita, and Steven 

Laub (collectively, the "Original Defendants"); 

WHEREAS, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint with leave to amend on July 16, 

2007 pursuant to motions to dismiss filed by the Original Defendants; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint") 

in the above-entitled action on August 21, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs named Michael Ross ("Defendant Ross") in the Amended Complaint 

as a new Defendant in the Action; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s July 31, 2007 Order, (the “July 31 Order”), on 

September 28, 2007, the Original Defendants filed four Motions to Dismiss the Amended Complaint 

(the “Motions”) on behalf of (1) Defendants Francis Barton, Kris Chellam, Donald Colvin, Pierre 

Fougere, Norman T. Hall, B. Jeffrey Katz, Chaiho Kim, Jack Peckham, Bernard Pruniaux, Steven 

Schumann, T. Peter Thomas, Graham Turner and Tsung-Ching Wu; (2) Defendants George Perlegos 

and Gust Perlegos; (3) Defendant Mikes Sisois; and (4) Nominal Defendant Atmel Corporation 

(“Atmel”); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the July 31 Order, the Original Defendants’ reply briefs were due on 

November 16, 2007, the hearing on the Motions to Dismiss was set for December 7, 2007, and a case 

management conference was set for December 7, 2007; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Plaintiffs’ request after attempting service on Defendant Ross, 

counsel for Defendant Ross agreed to waive service on his behalf, and service was waived as of 

October 31, 2007, and thus his response to the Amended Complaint is due on or before December 31, 

2007, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d); 

WHEREAS, because Defendant Ross waived service after the Original Defendants filed 

their Motions, Plaintiffs agreed to extend the response date for the Original Defendants’ Reply 

Case 5:06-cv-04592-JF Document 124 Filed 12/05/07 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SETTING SCHEDULE 

MASTER FILE NO. CV 06-4592 JF

2

Briefs in order to coordinate the briefing schedule with Defendant Ross and include Defendant Ross 

in the hearing on the Motions to Dismiss, which was scheduled for December 7, 2007; 

WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the parties have agreed, subject to Court approval, to 

continue the case management conference and hearing on the Original Defendants’ Motions until 

February 29, 2008 so that the Court can hear all Motions to Dismiss, including Defendant Ross’ 

Motion to Dismiss at that time; 

WHEREAS, the agreed upon schedule is not for the purpose of delay, promotes judicial 

efficiency, and will not cause prejudice to any party. 

THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiffs, Nominal Defendant 

Atmel, Defendant Ross and all of the remaining Originial Defendants, through their respective 

counsel of record, as follows: 

1. Defendant Ross shall file a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint by no later 

than January 2, 2008. 

2. Plaintiffs shall file an opposition to Defendant Ross’ motion to dismiss by no later 

than January 30, 2008. 

3. The Original Defendants shall file their reply briefs to Plaintiffs’ opposition to their 

Motions, which were filed on October 26, 2007, by no later than February 15, 2008. 

4. Defendant Ross shall file his reply to Plaintiffs' opposition to his Motion to Dismiss 

by no later than February 15, 2008. 

5. The hearing on the Original Defendants’ Motions is rescheduled to February 29, 

2008 at 9:00 a.m. 

6. The case management conference is also rescheduled to February 29, 2008 at 10:30 

a.m. 

7. The hearing on Defendant Ross' motion to dismiss is set for February 29, 2008, at 9 

a.m. to be heard together with the Original Defendants’ motions. 

8. The parties agree that, by entering into this stipulation, they do not waive any claim, 

argument or defense that they may have in this action and that nothing in this stipulation limits the 

rights of any party to take any action not inconsistent with its express terms. 

Case 5:06-cv-04592-JF Document 124 Filed 12/05/07 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SETTING SCHEDULE 

MASTER FILE NO. CV 06-4592 JF

3

Dated: November 30, 2007 SCHIFFRIN BARROWAY 

TOPAZ & KESSLER, LLP 

ERIC L. ZAGAR 

NICHOLE BROWNING 

TARA P. KAO 

By: /s/____________

Eric Zagar 

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Dated: November 30, 2007 WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN 

& HERZ LLP

FRANCIS M. GREGOREK 

BETSY C. MANIFOLD 

RACHELE R. RICKERT 

MARISA C. LIVESAY 

By: /s/__________________

 Betsy C. Manifold 

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Dated: November 30, 2007 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

DARRYL P. RAINS 

KENNETH A. KUWAYTI 

BRIAN LEVINE 

By: /s/__________________

 Brian Levine 

Attorneys for Defendants FRANCIS 

BARTON, KRIS CHELLAM, DONALD 

COLVIN, PIERRE FOUGERE, NORMAN T. 

HALL, B. JEFFREY KATZ, CHAIHO KIM, 

STEVE LAUB, DONALD PECKHAM, 

BERNARD PRUNIAUX, STEVEN 

SCHUMANN, DAVID SUGUSHITA, T. 

PETER THOMAS, GRAHAM TURNER, 

AND TSUNG-CHING WU AND NOMINAL 

DEFENDANT ATMEL CORPORATION 

Case 5:06-cv-04592-JF Document 124 Filed 12/05/07 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SETTING SCHEDULE 

MASTER FILE NO. CV 06-4592 JF

4

Dated: November 30, 2007 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP

JOHN L. COOPER 

ROBERT C. HOLTZAPPLE 

JESSICA K. NALL 

GRACE WON 

By: /s/_______________

 Jessica K. Nall 

Attorneys for Defendants GEORGE 

PERLEGOS AND GUST PERLEGOS 

Dated: November 30, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF JAMES L. PAGANO 

JAMES L. PAGANO 

IAN A. KASS 

By: /s/______________

James L. Pagano 

Attorneys for Defendant MIKES SISOIS 

Dated: November 30, 2007 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE 

LLP 

MICHAEL D. TORPEY 

ERIN L. BANSAL 

By: /s/____________ 

Erin Bansal 

Attorneys for Defendant MICHAEL ROSS 

 

Attestation Pursuant to General Order 45

I, Eric Zagar, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from 

the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 30th day of November, 2007 at Radnor, PA. 

Case 5:06-cv-04592-JF Document 124 Filed 12/05/07 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SETTING SCHEDULE 

MASTER FILE NO. CV 06-4592 JF

5

ORDER 

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 THE HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

 

12/5/07

Case 5:06-cv-04592-JF Document 124 Filed 12/05/07 Page 6 of 6