Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_06-cv-01012/USCOURTS-almd-2_06-cv-01012-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

HENRY LEE FORD III, #170 148 *

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:06-CV-1012-MEF

 (WO)

OFF. RONNIE SHEPPARD COI, et al., *

Defendants. *

 ______________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 6, 2006 the court granted Plaintiff ten days to show cause why his

complaint should not be dismissed for his failure to submit a prison account statement from

the account clerk at the Kilby Correctional Facility as directed by order filed November 15,

2006. (Doc. No. 4.) Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to comply with the December

6, 2006 order would result in a Recommendation that his complaint be dismissed. (Id.) The

requisite time has passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the order of the court.

Consequently, the court concludes that dismissal of this case is appropriate for Plaintiff’s

failures to comply with the orders of the court and to prosecute this action.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case

be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failures to comply with the orders of the

court and to prosecute this action. The court has determined that no lesser sanction will

suffice to compel compliance with the court's orders under the circumstances.

Case 2:06-cv-01012-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 01/09/07 Page 1 of 2
2

It is further

ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the said

Recommendation on or before January 22, 2007. Any objections filed must specifically

identify the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which the party is

objecting. Frivolous, conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District

Court. The parties are advised that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and,

therefore, it is not appealable.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the

Magistrate Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District

Court of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual

findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain

error or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982). See Stein

v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of

Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) ( en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the

decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on

September 30, 1981.

DONE, this 9th day of January, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01012-MEF-SRW Document 5 Filed 01/09/07 Page 2 of 2