Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00683/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-00683-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Irma Sandoval, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

MWR et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-10-0683-PHX-NVW

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Excel Group’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule

12(b)(6) (doc. #24). Because Excel filed an answer, its Motion to Dismiss is, in

substance, a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c). For the reasons

stated below, the Court will deny Excel’s motion. 

Plaintiff Sandoval’s amended complaint marginally states claims for relief. Its

main deficiency is that it was not plead with specificity. However, it was plead with

sufficient specificity to enable Excel to answer. The Court will therefore deny Excel’s

Motion to Dismiss. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Excel’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. #24) is

denied. 

DATED this 27th day of May, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-00683-NVW Document 28 Filed 05/27/10 Page 1 of 1