Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01817/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01817-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID KING,

Plaintiff,

v.

WANG,

Defendant.

No. 2:14-cv-1817 DAD P

ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed November 6, 2014, the court ordered plaintiff to complete and return, 

within thirty days, the USM-285 form and copies of his complaint which are required to effect 

service on the defendant Wang. On December 24, 2014, plaintiff submitted the copies of the 

complaint but failed to provide a complete address for defendant Wang on the USM-285 form.

Consequently, by order filed January 6, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to complete and 

return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 form necessary to effect service on defendant 

Wang, including a complete address. That thirty day period has long since passed, and plaintiff 

has not responded in any way to the court’s order.

In light of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall 

randomly assign a district judge to this action.

////

////

Case 2:14-cv-01817-KJM-DB Document 14 Filed 03/25/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 

Cir. 1991).

Dated: March 24, 2015

DAD:10

king1817.fusm

Case 2:14-cv-01817-KJM-DB Document 14 Filed 03/25/15 Page 2 of 2