Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03009/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03009-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 1. Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC

ROD M. FLIEGEL, Bar No. 168289

rfliegel@littler.com

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998

aspurchise@littler.com

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, California 94108.2693

Telephone: 415.433.1940

Facsimile: 415.399.8490

Attorneys for Defendants

Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL NOKCHAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, 

hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”), Rasier, LLC

(“Rasier”), and Hirease LLC (“Hirease”) (collectively “Defendants”) may have until fourteen (14) 

days after the Court’s ruling on the motion to consolidate in Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et 

al., Civil Action No. 14-cv-05241 (ECF No. 84) or the filing of a Consolidated Complaint that 

includes the captioned matter, whichever is later, to file their answer, motion or other response to

the Complaint of Plaintiff Michael Nokchan in the captioned matter.

Plaintiff filed his Complaint on June 29, 2015. On July 24th, Plaintiff and 

Defendants Uber and Rasier stipulated for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint until 

August 13, 2015. Defendants Uber and Rasier received an additional extension of time to respond 

until August 21, 2015 to meet and confer in good faith regarding the most efficient way to proceed 

Case 3:15-cv-03009-EMC Document 24 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 4
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 2. Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC

in light of this Court’s previous rulings in the related cases of Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et 

al., Civil Action No. 14-cv-05241 and Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 

14-cv-5200. Subsequent to that stipulation, Ronald Gillette filed a motion to consolidate the 

Gillette, Mohamed, and Nokchan litigation. As a result of that motion and the parties’ meet and 

confer efforts, they now agree the most efficient course is to await the final outcome of the motion to 

consolidate before Defendants are required to respond to the Complaint in this matter and Plaintiff 

Nokchan is required to take further action. Furthermore, Hirease’s original responsive pleading 

deadline is August 31, 2015, and has obtained no previous extensions of time to respond. No

objections, arguments, or defenses are waived by any party by virtue of this stipulation. This

stipulation will not require the alteration of any deadline already set by Court Order. Indeed, the 

Court’s August 3, 2015 Order (ECF No. 19) set the initial case management conference for this 

matter for November 12, 2015.

In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Plaintiff’s counsel, Shaun Setareh, and 

Hirease’s counsel, Timothy Hix, has concurred in this filing and use of their electronic signatures

below.

Case 3:15-cv-03009-EMC Document 24 Filed 08/21/15 Page 2 of 4
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 3. Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC

Dated: August 21, 2015

/s/ Rod M. Fliegel

ROD M. FLIEGEL

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND 

RASIER, LLC

/s/ Shaun Setareh________________________

SHAUN SETAREH, ESQUIRE

TUVIA KOROBKIN, ESQUIRE

SETAREH LAW GROUP

9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907 

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

shaun@setarehlaw.com

tuvia@setarehlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MICHAEL NOKCHAN

/s/ Timothy L. Hix_______________________

Timothy L. Hix, Esquire

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

333 S. Hope Street, Suite 3900

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406

thix@seyfarth.com

Attorneys for Defendant

HIREASE LLC

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: 

_____________________________________

HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN

8/21/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-03009-EMC Document 24 Filed 08/21/15 Page 3 of 4
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 4. Case No. 15-CV-03009-EMC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Rod M. Fliegel, hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to be filed with the Court 

and served upon the following:

Via CM/ECF:

Shaun Setareh, Esquire

Tuvia Korobkin, Esquire

Setareh Law Group

9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

shaun@setarehlaw.com

tuvia@setarehlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/ Rod M. Fliegel

Rod M. Fliegel

Dated: August 21, 2015

Case 3:15-cv-03009-EMC Document 24 Filed 08/21/15 Page 4 of 4