Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01305/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01305-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 07:499 Agricultural Commodities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHIQUITA FRESH, N.A., L.L.C., CASE NO. CV F 07-1305 LJO DLB

Plaintiff, ORDER ON COUNSEL’S LETTER

REGARDING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

vs. BRIEFING

PANDOL ASSOCIATES MARKETING,

INC., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

This Court issued a September 14, 2007 amended temporary restraining order (“TRO”) setting

a September 24, 2007 deadline to oppose a preliminary injunction and a September 27, 2007 deadline

for reply papers. On September 26, 2007, this Court received defense counsel’s letter, also signed by

plaintiff’s counsel, to attempt to extend briefing deadlines. 

The parties fail to demonstrate good cause to extend briefing deadlines, and the stipulation of

the parties’ counsel is insufficient to do so. The TRO’s briefing schedule remains in effect. No

opposition papers have been filed and served timely. As such, this Court is prepared to address issuance

of a preliminary injunction on the current record before this Court. This Court will strike opposition

papers attempted to be filed without a showing of good cause to extend the TRO’s briefing schedule.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01305-LJO-DLB Document 12 Filed 09/26/07 Page 1 of 1