Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_10-cv-00020/USCOURTS-ared-4_10-cv-00020-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12131 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a)(7) recognizes a reply to an answer only if ordered by the court. In

this case, the Court did not order the Plaintiff to file a reply to the answer. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

 MARILYN MCCOY NORWOOD PLAINTIFF

V. CASE NO. 4:10CV00020 JMM

WOODBRIDGE PULASKI LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP, OWNER OF

KANIS POINTE TOWNHOMES DEFENDANT

ORDER

Plaintiff filed her pro se complaint on January 14, 2010 alleging that Defendant is the

owner of Kanis Pointe Townhomes and that Defendant has violated the ADA. Defendant filed

an answer to Plaintiff’s complaint on February 10, 2010. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed a Response to

Answer to Complaint. Pending is Defendant’s motion to strike the Response to Answer to

Complaint. (Docket # 9). 

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not allow for the filing of a Response to an

Answer, Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to strike is granted. Plaintiff’s

response will be stricken from the record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of April, 2010. 

_____________________________

James M. Moody

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00020-JMM Document 11 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 1