Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00867/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00867-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 On January 8, 2007, plaintiff filed objections to the December 22, 2006 findings and 1

recommendations concerning four defendants for whom plaintiff has not yet accomplished

service of process. In the objections, plaintiff states “Plaintiff does oppose the recommendation

for summary judgment.” (Id. at 1.) This statement is insufficient to serve as an opposition. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PERRY LEE SISCO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0867 GEB JFM P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On December 13, 2006, defendants Butler, Cardeno, Davis, Dazo, Gaitonde,

Grannis, Leichner, Martinez, Milson, Navarro, Pagala, Stahl, and Torruella filed a motion for

summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed 1

the motion. 

Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file

written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any

opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” On October 13, 2005, plaintiff was advised of the

requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may

be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. 

Case 2:05-cv-00867-GEB -JFM Document 44 Filed 02/05/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.” In the order filed October 13, 2005, plaintiff was advised 

that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be

dismissed.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the

date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss, if he has any

opposition, or a statement of non-opposition if he has none. Failure to comply with this order

will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b).

DATED: February 5, 2007.

/001; sisco.46o

Case 2:05-cv-00867-GEB -JFM Document 44 Filed 02/05/07 Page 2 of 2