Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00516/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00516-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 540
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III

Assistant United States Attorney

2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401

Fresno, CA 93721

Telephone: (559) 497-4000

Facsimile: (559) 497-4099

Attorneys for the 

United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NICHOLAS RIANTO,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 1:12-CV-00516 DAD

 [1:01-CR-05063 AWI]

GOVERNMENT’S SECOND MOTION FOR 

AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND 

TO DEFENDANT’S PETITION FOR WRIT 

OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS; ORDER

Hon. Dale A. Drozd

The United States, by and through its attorney, Assistant United States Attorney Henry Z. 

Carbajal III, hereby requests a second extension of time to May 18, 2016 to file its response to 

defendant’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Dkt. No. 1.

On January 25, 2016, the Court ordered the United States Attorney’s Office to file a 

response to the defendant’s writ of error coram nobis petition by February 16, 2016. Dkt. No. 8. 

The matter was then assigned to the undersigned attorney. The criminal case underlying the 

petition dates back to 2001. On February 12, 2016, the Court granted an initial extension of time 

of 60 days for the government to file its response to the defendant’s coram nobis petition, resulting 

in a due date of April 18, 2016. The government now requests an additional extension of time of 

30 days to complete its response.

The undersigned is conducting additional legal research regarding the viability of the 

Case 1:12-cv-00516-DAD-SKO Document 15 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

petitioner’s claims and is in the process of drafting its response to the defendant’s petition. The 

undersigned also plans to file a formal motion to conduct discovery into defense counsel’s 

communications with Rianto regarding the defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims in 

addition to the declaration filed with the Court. Because the undersigned has also been drafting 

another brief in the interim, which is due to the Ninth Circuit on April 20, 2016, an extension of 

time for 30 more days in this case is necessary.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the United States’ second motion for extension of time to 

file a response to the defendant’s petition for writ of error coram nobis is GRANTED. The United 

States shall file and serve its responsive pleading on or before May 18, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00516-DAD-SKO Document 15 Filed 04/14/16 Page 2 of 2