Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02722/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02722-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY DeMARTINI, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MICHAEL DeMARTINI, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-2722 JAM CKD PS

AMENDED FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

On April 14, 2016, findings and recommendations were filed. ECF No. 99. Plaintiffs/ 

counterdefendants have filed “objections” requesting clarification of an apparent inconsistency in 

the findings and recommendations. The objections are well taken; the court committed a clerical 

error in drafting the findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, filed April 14, 2016 (ECF 

No. 99), ARE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:

a. ECF No. 99 at 9:12, “Plaintiffs/counterclaimants . . .” is amended to read 

“Plaintiffs/counterdefendants . . .”

b. ECF No. 99 at 12:12, “. . . be denied without prejudice to its renewal. . .” is 

amended to read “. . . be granted without prejudice to its renewal . . .”

These amended findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 

Case 2:14-cv-02722-DJC-CKD Document 101 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

days after being served with these amended findings and recommendations, any party may file 

written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be 

captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file 

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: April 28, 2016

4 demartini2722.amd.f&r

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-02722-DJC-CKD Document 101 Filed 04/29/16 Page 2 of 2