Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01728/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01728-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUANE REED MOORE,

Plaintiff,

v.

B. DUFFY, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-1728 WBS CKD P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 13, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Plaintiff’s “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations” appear to be in effect a request to file a “Complete Amended 

Complaint.” Plaintiff already filed an Amended Complaint (Docket No 13) in response to the 

Magistrate Judge’s earlier findings and recommendations (Docket No. 12). If plaintiff wishes to 

Case 2:13-cv-01728-WBS-CKD Document 18 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

file a Second Amended Complaint, he will have file and serve a separate noticed motion for 

permission to do so. See F.R.Civ.P. 15(a). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court 

finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 13, 2014, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants Duffy, Thumser, Elam, Carolan, Horgan, Allen, J. Jones, S. Jones, Zamora, 

Matteucci and Toche are dismissed.

Dated: April 9, 2014

moor1728.804

Case 2:13-cv-01728-WBS-CKD Document 18 Filed 04/10/14 Page 2 of 2