Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01207/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01207-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PROCEDURE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEFS AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEFS

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

Kent A. Gardiner (pro hac vice)

Kathryn D. Kirmayer (pro hac vice)

Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)

David D. Cross (pro hac vice)

Matthew J. McBurney (pro hac vice)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004-2595

Telephone: 202-624-2500

Facsimile: 202-628-5116

E-mail: kgardiner@crowell.com

kkirmayer@crowell.com

jmurphy@crowell.com

dcross@crowell.com

mmcburney@crowell.com

Daniel A. Sasse (CA Bar No. 236234)

Theresa C. Lopez (CA Bar No. 205338)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor

Irvine, CA 92614-8505

Telephone: 949-263-8400

Facsimile: 949-263-8414

E-mail: dsasse@crowell.com

tlopez@crowell.com

Counsel for Sun Microsystems, Inc., Unisys Corporation, Jaco Electronics, Inc., Edge 

Electronics, Inc., and All American Semiconductor, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Sun Microsystems, Inc., et al. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al.

Unisys Corporation v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al.

All American Semiconductor, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al

Edge Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al.

Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al.

DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust, by its 

Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al.

Case Nos.: C-06-01665 PJH 

C-06-02915 PJH

C-07-01200 PJH 

C-07-01207 PJH 

C-07-01212 PJH 

C-07-01381 PJH

Assigned for all purposes to the

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING PROCEDURE FOR FILING 

PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEFS AND DEFENDANTS’ 

REPLY BRIEFS

Case 4:07-cv-01207-PJH Document 230 Filed 09/23/08 Page 1 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PROCEDURE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEFS AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEFS

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

STIPULATION

This Stipulation is entered into between plaintiffs Sun Microsystems, Inc., Unisys 

Corporation, All American Semiconductor, Inc., Edge Electronics, Inc., Jaco Electronics, Inc., 

and DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendants Hynix 

Semiconductor Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Elpida Memory, Inc., Elpida Memory 

(USA) Inc., Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Nanya 

Technology Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation USA, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., 

and NEC Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) in the above-captioned actions, 

and is made with regard to the following facts:

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss certain of Plaintiff Sun Microsystems,

Inc.’s claims on July 8, 2008;

WHEREAS, Defendants served on Plaintiffs on July 30, 2008, and filed with the Court on 

August 8, 2008, other dispositive motions and a motion to exclude the testimony of Plaintiffs’ 

expert Dr. Halbert White (collectively, together with Defendants’ motion to dismiss, 

“Defendants’ Motions”);

WHEREAS, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file briefs in opposition to Defendants’ Motions 

(collectively, “Plaintiffs’ Opposition Briefs”) is September 24, 2008;

WHEREAS, the deadline for Defendants to file reply briefs in further support of 

Defendants’ Motions (collectively, “Defendants’ Reply Briefs”) is October 29, 2008;

WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred regarding the service and filing of exhibits to 

Plaintiffs’ Opposition Briefs and Defendants’ Reply Briefs containing information designated 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” pursuant to the protective orders entered in these actions;

WHEREAS, the parties are cooperating with each other, and with third parties, in order to 

minimize the burden on the Court arising from the filing of Plaintiffs’ Opposition Briefs and 

Defendants’ Reply Briefs with respect to materials containing information designated 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” and the need, if any, to file such exhibits under seal;

WHEREAS, this Court, during a telephonic conference with the parties held July 24, 

Case 4:07-cv-01207-PJH Document 230 Filed 09/23/08 Page 2 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PROCEDURE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEFS AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEFS

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

2008, established a procedure for serving and filing Defendants’ Motions that provided the parties 

and the Court with nine days to determine what materials could be filed under seal, thereby 

substantially diminishing the burden on the Court by dramatically reducing the number of 

documents to be presented to the Court for a ruling on motions to seal and then by reducing the 

number of materials to be lodged with the Court and filed under seal to only one document 

through the Court’s ruling on the motions to seal;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to follow nearly the same procedure for Plaintiffs’ 

Opposition Briefs and Defendants’ Reply Briefs in order to again substantially diminish the 

burden on the Court;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED as follows:

1. Plaintiffs will serve their Opposition Briefs on Defendants no later than 

Wednesday, September 24, 2008, by email (any exhibits that cannot be served by 

email due to size limitations will be served by overnight delivery);

2. Defendants will identify the information cited in Plaintiffs’ Opposition Briefs for 

which they will withdraw the “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential”

designations no later than 10:00 a.m. (Eastern) on Friday, September 26, 2008;

3. The parties will file with the Court any necessary motions to seal and supporting 

declarations relating to Plaintiffs’ Opposition Briefs no later than Friday, 

September 26, 2008;

4. Plaintiffs will file with the Court their Opposition Briefs with the Court no later 

than Thursday, October 2, 2008;

5. Defendants will serve their Reply Briefs on Plaintiffs and file the same with the 

Court no later than Friday, October 31, 2008 (defendants will serve their Reply 

Briefs on Plaintiffs by email (any exhibits that cannot be served by email due to 

size limitations will be served by overnight delivery));

6. The parties will file with the Court any necessary motions to seal and supporting 

declarations relating to Defendants’ Reply Briefs no later than Friday, October 31, 

2008; and

Case 4:07-cv-01207-PJH Document 230 Filed 09/23/08 Page 3 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PROCEDURE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEFS AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEFS

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

7. The parties will endeavor in good faith to meet and confer in advance of the filing 

of Defendants’ Reply Briefs to identify information for which the “Confidential” 

or “Highly Confidential” designations will be withdrawn, such that the 

information may be publicly filed.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: September 22, 2008 CROWELL & MORING LLP

By: /s/ David D. Cross

David D. Cross

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.;

UNISYS CORPORATION;

ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.;

EDGE ELECTRONICS, INC. and

JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.

Dated: September 22, 2008 LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P.

By: /s/ James M. Lockhart

James M. Lockhart

Attorneys for Plaintiff DRAM CLAIMS 

LIQUIDATION TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE, 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Dated: September 22, 2008 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Paul B. Salvaty

Paul B. Salvaty

Attorneys for Defendants

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. and

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC.

Case 4:07-cv-01207-PJH Document 230 Filed 09/23/08 Page 4 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PROCEDURE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEFS AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEFS

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

Dated: September 22, 2008 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

By: /s/ Howard M. Ullman

Howard M. Ullman

Attorneys for Defendants

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and 

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION USA

Dated: September 22, 2008 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn

Harrison J. Frahn IV

Attorneys for Defendants 

ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and 

ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC.

Dated: September 22, 2008 THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER 

LLP

By: /s/ Robert Pringle

Robert Pringle

Attorneys for Defendants 

NEC ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

Dated: September 22, 2008 KAYE SCHOLER LLP

By: /s/ Julian Brew

Julian Brew

Attorneys for Defendants 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA 

CORP.

Case 4:07-cv-01207-PJH Document 230 Filed 09/23/08 Page 5 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-5-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PROCEDURE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEFS AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEFS

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

Dated: September 22, 2008 SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON 

LLP

By: /s/ David Garcia

David Garcia

Attorneys for Defendants 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

Dated: September 22, 2008 GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By: /s/ Joel Sanders

Joel Sanders

Attorneys for Defendants 

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. and

MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC.

Dated: September 22, 2008 THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER 

LLP 

By: /s/ Samuel J. Maselli

Samuel J. Maselli

Attorneys for Defendants 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. and

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC. in 

the DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust matter only

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________

Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Court Judge

9/23/08

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-01207-PJH Document 230 Filed 09/23/08 Page 6 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-6-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: PROCEDURE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ BRIEFS AND DEFENDANTS’ REPLY BRIEFS

CASE NOS. C06-01665; CO6-02915; C07-01200; C07-01207; C07-01212; C07-01381

ATTESTATION OF FILING

I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the 

Plaintiffs and the Defendants listed in the signature blocks above.

/s/ David D. Cross

David D. Cross

Attorney for Plaintiffs

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.;

UNISYS CORPORATION;

ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.;

EDGE ELECTRONICS, INC. and

JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.

Case 4:07-cv-01207-PJH Document 230 Filed 09/23/08 Page 7 of 7