Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01823/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01823-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERNARD BUSHELMAN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

NEIL ADLER, Warden, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

)

 )

1:07-cv-01823-AWI-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 5)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DENYING PENDING MOTIONS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

CLOSE ACTION

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On January 4, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a

Recommendation that the instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

be DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable claim, and the Clerk

of Court be directed to enter judgment. These Findings and

Recommendation were served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the

date of service of that order. On January 14, 2008, Petitioner

filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

//

Case 1:07-cv-01823-AWI -SMS Document 13 Filed 03/07/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendation are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed January 4, 2008,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable claim;

3. All pending motions, including the motions for a

decision, a court order, and for default judgment, are

DENIED as moot; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 7, 2008 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01823-AWI -SMS Document 13 Filed 03/07/08 Page 2 of 2