Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01652/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01652-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Contitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

TOM MERRELL, 

NO. CIV. S-05-1652 FCD DAD

Plaintiff,

ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. RE SANCTIONS

BOARD OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

(BBS), et al., 

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

1. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is

continued to October 21, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff shall file

and serve his opposition brief or notice of non-opposition no

later than October 7, 2005. The Defendants’ may file and serve a

reply on or before October 14, 2005. 

2. Plaintiff’s counsel is ordered to show cause why he 

should not be sanctioned in the amount of $150.00 for failing to

file an opposition or notice of non-opposition to defendant’s

motion in compliance with Local Rule 78-230(c).

///

Case 2:05-cv-01652-FCD-DAD Document 6 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Plaintiff’s counsel shall file his response to the

order to show cause on or before October 7, 2005.

4. A hearing on the order to show cause will follow the

hearing on the Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 26, 2005.

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01652-FCD-DAD Document 6 Filed 09/26/05 Page 2 of 2