Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520-90/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Pursuant to the June 8, 2006 joint hearing held in Sacramento, California, a joint

meeting was held in Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, 90-cv-00520 (E.D. Cal.) and Plata v.

Schwarzenegger, 01-cv-01351 (N.D. Cal.) on September 26, 2006 for the purpose of facilitating

the close coordination of both cases. The meeting was attended by the Honorable Lawrence K.

Karlton, the Honorable Thelton E. Henderson, the Honorable John F. Moulds, Special Master

Michael Keating, Deputy Special Master Matthew Lopes, Receiver Robert Sillen, and Chief of

Staff for the Receiver, John Hagar. 

At the meeting, the following topics were discussed: the Special Session of the

California Legislature; the Receiver’s Second Report, including, improving and streamlining the

hiring process of medical professionals, increasing salaries, the San Quentin Project and the new

medical facility; the decision of Los Angeles County to cancel its contract with California

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 1991 Filed 10/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) for the use of 1,300 beds in the Pitchess

Detention Facility; and the possibility that several thousand CDCR inmates may be transferred to

out of state facilities. 

There will be another meeting between the Plata court and the Coleman court in

approximately three months. In the meantime, the Special Master and the Receiver continue to

work together and to coordinate their efforts. 

The purpose of this order is to inform the parties of the meeting and the issues discussed. 

The parties need not respond to this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 4, 2006.

Case 2:90-cv-00520-KJM-SCR Document 1991 Filed 10/04/06 Page 2 of 2