Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05584/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-05584-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 196
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

STIPULATION RE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

LEWIS, D’AMATO, BRISBOIS 

&

BISGAARD, LLP

ONE SANSOME STREET, SUITE 1400

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104

TELEPHONE (415) 362-2580

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4810-5669-2741.1

PETER DIXON, SB# 39063

ALEX GRAFT, SB# 239647

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

One Sansome Street, Suite 1400

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 362-2580

Facsimile: (415) 434-0882

Attorneys for Defendants PRETI FLAHERTY 

BELIEVEAU PACHIOS & HALEY, LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IAN INMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL;

RICHARD INMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL;

DIANE INMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND

JUNGLE PULSE, INC., A CALIFORNIA

CORP.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JUNGLE QUEST FRANCHISING, LLC,

WILLIAM E. GABBARD, KEVIN P.

HEIN, JAMES S. MOLLOY, DOUGLAS

W. ROOT, AND PRETI FLATHERTY

BELIEVEAU PACHIOS & HALEY, LLP,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C09 5584

STIPULATION AND ORDER

EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR

FILING RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’

COMPLAINT

FILE DATE: November 24, 2009

TRIAL DATE: Not Set Yet

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT:

SUBJECT TO COURT APPROVAL, Plaintiffs IAN INMAN, RICHARD INMAN,

DIANE INMAN, and JUNGLE PULSE, INC. (“PLAINTIFFS”), Defendants JUNGLE QUEST

FRANCHISING LLC, WILLIAM E. GABBARD, KEVIN P. HEIN, JAMES S. MOLLOY and

DOUGLAS W. ROOT (collectively “JUNGLE QUEST”), and Defendant PRETI, FLAHERTY,

BELIEVEAU, PACHIOS & HALEY, LLP (“PRETI”) (collectively “the Parties”), through their

respective attorneys of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

Case 4:09-cv-05584-CW Document 6 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION RE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

LEWIS, D’AMATO, BRISBOIS 

&

BISGAARD, LLP

ONE SANSOME STREET, SUITE 1400

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104

TELEPHONE (415) 362-2580

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4810-5669-2741.1 2

WHEREAS, PLAINTIFFS filed their Complaint in the above Court on November 24,

2009 (“Complaint”) alleging causes of action for alleged violation of California franchise

investment law, fraud and deceit, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract against

JUNGLE QUEST, a cause of action for negligence against PRETI, and causes of action for

alleged violation of the California unfair business practices law and for declaratory relief against

all the Defendants. 

WHEREAS, the Parties are interested in exploring the possibility of early resolution which

would be more meaningful if pursued in advance of responses being filed to the Complaint. 

BASED UPON THE FOREGOING, the Parties hereto, HEREBY STIPULATE that the

deadline to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint on behalf of both JUNGLE QUEST and

PRETI shall be extended to March 12, 2010 to allow the Parties sufficient time to explore possible

resolution. 

This stipulation may be executed by facsimile in counterparts.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: January 29, 2010 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

By 

Peter Dixon

Attorneys for Defendants PRETI 

FLAHERTY BELIEVEAU PACHIOS &

HALEY, LLP

DATED: January ___, 2010 WHEELER, TRIGG, O’DONNELL LLP

By 

Sean Baker

Attorneys for Defendants JUNGLE QUEST 

Case 4:09-cv-05584-CW Document 6 Filed 02/03/10 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION RE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

LEWIS, D’AMATO, BRISBOIS 

&

BISGAARD, LLP

ONE SANSOME STREET, SUITE 1400

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104

TELEPHONE (415) 362-2580

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4810-5669-2741.1 3

FRANCHISING LLC, WILLIAM E.

GABBARD, KEVIN P. HEIN, JAMES S.

MOLLOY and DOUGLAS W. ROOT

[Signatures Continue on Following Page]

DATED: January ___, 2010 LAGARIUS & BOULTER, LLP

By 

Robert S. Boulter

Attorneys for Plaintiffs IAN INMAN, 

RICHARD INMAN, DIANE INMAN, and

JUNGLE PULSE, INC.

ORDER

Having considered the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants JUNGLE QUEST FRANCHISING LLC, WILLIAM E. GABBARD, 

KEVIN P. HEIN, JAMES S. MOLLOY and DOUGLAS W. ROOT response to Plaintiffs

IAN INMAN, RICHARD INMAN, DIANE INMAN, and JUNGLE PULSE, INC.’s Complaint

shall be filed with this Court by March 12, 2010.

2. Defendant PRETI, FLAHERTY, BELIEVEAU, PACHIOS & HALEY, LLP 

response to Plaintiffs IAN INMAN, RICHARD INMAN, DIANE INMAN, and JUNGLE PULSE,

INC.’s Complaint shall also be filed with this Court by March 12, 2010.

Dated: 2/3/10

____________________________________

Hon. Claudia Wilken

Case 4:09-cv-05584-CW Document 6 Filed 02/03/10 Page 3 of 3