Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00922/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00922-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL COREY SLAUGHTER,

Petitioner,

v.

RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin 

State Prison,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:05-cv-00922-DAD-SAB

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SECOND

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

MEMORANDUM ADDRESSING MERITS

(Doc. No. 114)

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING 

ORDER

(Doc. No. 109)

Before the court is a motion brought by petitioner, through counsel Assistant Federal 

Defenders Jennifer Mann and Kelly Culshaw, to extend by thirty (30) days the current January 

31, 2017 deadline for petitioner’s filing his memorandum of points and authorities on the merits 

of each of his claims set forth in his second amended petition for federal habeas relief. According 

to petitioner’s counsel, the requested extension of time, petitioner’s second, is necessary due to

counsel’s responsibilities in other matters. Counsel estimate they have completed seventy percent 

of the work required in order to file the memorandum of points and authorities in question.

Assistant Federal Defender Mann also represents to the court that counsel for respondent, Deputy 

Attorney General Ryan McCarroll, does not object to the requested extension. 

///// 

Case 1:05-cv-00922-KES Document 115 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The court finds good cause to grant petitioner a second extension of time to file his 

memorandum of points and authorities addressing the merits of each of his claims and will

therefore modify the previously established briefing schedule. 

Accordingly, 

1. Petitioner’s unopposed motion for second extension of time to file his 

memorandum of points and authorities addressing the merits of each claim in the 

second amended petition is granted. Petitioner shall now file that memorandum by 

March 2, 2017. Respondent’s memorandum in opposition shall be filed by not 

later than August 31, 2017. Petitioner shall file any reply memorandum by not 

later than March 2, 2018. 

2. Petitioner shall file any motion for discovery, expansion of the record and/or 

evidentiary hearing by not later than June 18, 2018. Respondent shall file any 

opposition by not later than August 20, 2018. Petitioner shall file any reply by not 

later than October 15, 2018. 

3. In all other regards the May 27, 2015 scheduling order shall remain in full force 

and effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2017 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00922-KES Document 115 Filed 01/30/17 Page 2 of 2