Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00815/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00815-37/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SID LANDAU,

Plaintiff,

v.

W.T. VOSS, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB PC

ORDER CONTINUING TELEPHONIC 

TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING TO 

FEBRUARY 10, 2014

Plaintiff Sid Landau (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s claim arises out of 

Defendants’ alleged use of excessive force while he was at Coalinga State Hospital (“CSP”) on 

December 15, 2006.

On February 3, 2014, the Court had scheduled a Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing 

for 3:00p.m. At approximately 3:00 p.m., Defendants’ counsel contacted the Court. Defendants 

counsel’ stated that he had attempted to call Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s previously provided phone 

number for the Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing between the parties and the Court.

Defendants’ counsel informed the Court that Plaintiff was not available at the provided phone 

number. Defendants’ counsel stated that he and his staff would continue attempting to call 

Plaintiff. The Court requested Defendants’ counsel inform the Court of any updates. 

At approximately 4:00 p.m., Defendants’ counsel again called the Court. Defendants’ 

Case 1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB Document 147 Filed 02/04/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

counsel stated that Plaintiff remained unavailable at the number he had provided to Defendants’ 

counsel. Defendants’ counsel stated that his staff’s other attempts to find Plaintiff at Coalinga 

State Hospital had not resulted in finding Plaintiff.

Given the inability to contact Plaintiff, the Court continued the Telephonic Trial 

Confirmation Hearing until February 10, 2014 at 3:00 p.m. 

The parties are ORDERED to contact the Court at 3:00 p.m. on February 10, 2004. 

Defendants’ counsel is DIRECTED to coordinate the telephonic conference with the Court. 

Plaintiff SHALL provide Defendants’ counsel and the Court with Plaintiff’s contact phone 

number as soon as possible. Plaintiff is reminded that continued failure to prosecute this action 

and comply with Court orders may result in sanctions, including terminating sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2014 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB Document 147 Filed 02/04/14 Page 2 of 2