Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_00-cv-04599/USCOURTS-cand-3_00-cv-04599-156/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DELPHINE ALLEN, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 00-cv-04599-TEH 

ORDER REQUIRING QUARTERLY 

REPORTS ON ARBITRATIONS 

 

On September 1, 2015, the City reported that many of the Court Investigator’s 

recommendations concerning arbitrations have now been implemented. Defendants shall 

continue to implement these recommendations and shall file quarterly progress reports on 

or before March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 each year. The first such 

report shall be due on or before December 31, 2015. 

These reports shall include status updates on all recommendations that have not yet 

been reported as implemented, including a detailed explanation and revised timelines if 

any projected timelines were missed or are delayed; a description of any developments 

regarding the recommendations that have already been reported as implemented; a 

description of arbitration decisions since the previous report; a description of the City’s 

efforts to ensure that the implemented recommendations and related reforms are 

sustainable; and any other relevant information. As previously ordered, confidential 

disciplinary and personnel information may be filed under seal, with a redacted version 

filed in the public record. 

// 

// 

// 

Case 3:00-cv-04599-WHO Document 1071 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The Compliance Director shall continue to have authority to take corrective action 

if necessary, and the Court may also re-engage the services of the Court Investigator to 

evaluate Defendants’ progress at any time. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 09/28/15 _____________________________________ 

THELTON E. HENDERSON 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:00-cv-04599-WHO Document 1071 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 2