Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03318/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03318-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ted Randall,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-3318-PHX-MHM (BPV) 

ORDER

Plaintiff, Ted Randall, filed his pro se Civil Rights Complaint on October 20, 2005.

(Dkt.#1). The same day the Court issued its "Notice of Assignment" advising Plaintiff that

he "must file a Notice of Change of Address if your address changes" and that failure to

comply "will result in your document being STRUCK and/or your case being DISMISSED."

(Dkt.#2). On April 4, 2006 the Court issued a screen order advising Plaintiff that "at all

times during the pendency of this action, Plaintiff shall immediately advise the Court and the

United States Marshal of any change of address and its effective date." (Dkt.#3). On April

11, 2006 Plaintiff's copies of the April 4, 2006 orders were returned by the post-office with

the notation of "Released." (Dkt.#5). 

The Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation on June 5, 2006

recommending that Plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with

the Court’s Order and failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) Fed.R.Civ.P. (Dkt.#6). The

Court notes that Plaintiff's copy of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was

Case 2:05-cv-03318-MHM Document 8 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

returned by the post-office with the notation of "Released." In addition, Plaintiff has not

filed any objections. The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court. (Dkt.#6).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case for Plaintiff's failure to comply

with the Court’s order and failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the clerk of the Court to enter judgment

accordingly.

DATED this 2nd day of August, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03318-MHM Document 8 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 2