Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05330/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05330-26/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

'/$ 3,3(5//3 86

($673$/2$/72

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

WEST\288937549.1

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING JURY INSTRUCTIONS 

CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG) 

MARK D. FOWLER (Bar No. 124235) 

mark.fowler@us.dlapiper.com 

CLAYTON THOMPSON (Bar No. 291331) 

clayton.thompson@us.dlapiper.com 

YAKOV M. ZOLOTOREV (Bar No. 224260) 

jake.zolotorev@us.dlapiper.com 

SUMMER TORREZ (Bar No. 264858) 

summer.torrez@us.dlapiper.com 

JONATHAN HICKS (Bar No. 274634) 

jonathan.hicks@us.dlapiper.com 

ERIN MCLAUGHLIN (Bar No. 290853) 

erin.mclaughlin@us.dlapiper.com

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 

Tel: 650.833.2000 

Fax: 650.833.2001 

ERIN P. GIBSON (Bar No. 229305) 

erin.gibson@us.dlapiper.com 

SUSAN ACQUISTA (Bar No. 253969) 

susan.acquista@us.dlapiper.com

PETER MAGGIORE (Bar No. 292534) 

peter.maggiore@us.dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

401 B Street, Suite 1700 

San Diego, CA 92101-4297 

Tel: 619.699.2700 

Fax: 619.699.2701 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 

INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

APPLE INC., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 14-cv-05330 HSG 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO SUBMIT 

JOINT SET OF PROPOSED JURY 

INSTRUCTIONS 

Case 4:14-cv-05330-HSG Document 412 Filed 01/13/20 Page 1 of 4
'/$ 3,3(5//3 86

($673$/2$/72

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

WEST\288937549.1 -1-

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING JURY INSTRUCTIONS 

CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG) 

`Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-1(a)(5), and 7-12, Plaintiff DSS Technology 

Management, Inc. (“DSS”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) (collectively, the “Parties”), 

through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows regarding the submission of 

the joint set of proposed jury instructions: 

WHEREAS, on January 16, 2019, the Court entered a Scheduling Order setting the 

Pretrial Conference for January 28, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. and Jury Selection/Jury Trial for February 

24, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. (Dkt. 183); 

WHEREAS, on December 4, 2019, the clerk issued a notice that the Pretrial Conference, 

previously set for January 28, 2020, is continued to February 4, 2020, at 3:00 p.m., but pretrial 

filings are due based on the original not the continued pretrial conference date (Dkt. 357); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Civil Pretrial And Trial Standing Order For Cases Before 

District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., January 14, 2020 is the deadline for the Parties to submit 

to the Court a proposed joint set of jury instructions along with one-page explanations as to 

disputed instructions; 

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and agreed to extend the deadline for the 

Parties to submit a proposed joint set of jury instructions along with one-page explanations as to 

disputed instructions, by one week, to January 21, 2020; 

WHEREAS, good cause exists to permit this one-week extension of the deadline to 

submit a proposed joint set of jury instructions along with one-page explanations as to disputed 

instructions. The Parties have been engaged in meet and confers, in order to reduce the number 

of disputed instructions and accompanying explanations. The additional week will allow the 

Parties to continue to engage in this process and further reduce the number of disputed 

instructions and accompanying explanations for submission to this Court; and 

WHEREAS, the one-week extension of the deadline to submit a proposed joint set of jury 

instructions along with one-page explanations as to disputed instructions will not alter the date of 

any event or any deadline already set by this Court in this case. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Case 4:14-cv-05330-HSG Document 412 Filed 01/13/20 Page 2 of 4
'/$ 3,3(5//3 86

($673$/2$/72

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

WEST\288937549.1 -2-

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING JURY INSTRUCTIONS 

CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG) 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), concurrence to the filing of this document was obtained 

from Niky Bagley, counsel for DSS Technology Management, Inc., on January 10, 2020. 

Dated: January 10, 2020 DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

By /s/ Summer Torrez 

MARK D. FOWLER 

CLAYTON THOMPSON 

YAKOV M. ZOLOTOREV 

ERIN P. GIBSON 

SUSAN ACQUISTA 

SUMMER TORREZ 

JONATHAN HICKS 

ERIN MCLAUGHLIN 

PETER MAGGIORE 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

Dated: January 10, 2020 

BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC 

By /s/ Niky Bagley 

CHRISTOPHER M. JOE 

ERIC W. BUETHER 

BRIAN A. CARPENTER 

NIKY BAGLEY 

KENNETH KULA 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DSS Technology Management, Inc. 

Case 4:14-cv-05330-HSG Document 412 Filed 01/13/20 Page 3 of 4
'/$ 3,3(5//3 86

($673$/2$/72

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

WEST\288937549.1 -3-

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING JURY INSTRUCTIONS 

CASE NO. 14-CV-05330 (HSG) 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: 1/13/2020 

By 

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 

United States District Judge

Case 4:14-cv-05330-HSG Document 412 Filed 01/13/20 Page 4 of 4