Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03555/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03555-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STACY NESBY,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE CITY OF OAKLAND, ET AL.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

No. C 05-3555 JL

ORDER ON DISCOVERY

DISPUTE

(Granting Docket # 36)

Introduction

This Court has jurisdiction over this case under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and by consent of

the parties as provided by 28 U.S.C. §636(c) and Civil Local Rule 73. The parties

submitted a discovery dispute, dated August 18th, 2006, pursuant to this Court’s Standing

Order and the Minute Order of the Case Management Conference on August 16th, 2006. 

Discovery closed on July 28. The last day to bring a discovery motion was seven court

days after the cut off. 

Discovery Dispute

On July 17, 2006, without any prior meet and confer as required by Civil Local Rule

30-1, Plaintiff served a 30(b)(6) deposition notice directing Defendants to designate and

produce a number of witnesses to testify on 23 separate topics.

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 40 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 2 of 2

The Court has reviewed the August 18th memorandum. The matter is suitable for

disposition without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). The main issues in

this case involve the disposition of an electronic arrest warrant issued by the San Francisco

Police Department and Plaintiff’s claim of use of excessive force by officers of the Oakland

Police Department. 

Order

The Court hereby directs Defendants to make available a knowledgeable witness to

testify on topics 15 through 17 and 22 through 23. The hearing on this motion on

September 20, 2006 is hereby vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 30, 2006

__________________________________

 James Larson

 Chief Magistrate Judge

G:\JLALL\CHAMBERS\CASES\CIVIL\05-3555\ord-36.wpd

Case 3:05-cv-03555-JL Document 40 Filed 08/30/06 Page 2 of 2