Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05003/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05003-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MALCOLM ANDRE YOUNG, 1:02-CV-05003-REC-SMS-P 

Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR 

 INFORMATION 

vs. (Document #74) 

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT 

Defendants. OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

 / (Document #81)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. On August 26, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for information about the trial

schedule for this action. On August 31, 2005, plaintiff filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus

ad testificandum. 

The Court generally does not respond to requests for information. However,

Plaintiff is advised that on August 8, 2005, the court issued an order vacating the second

scheduling order of February 16, 2005. Therefore, the trial schedule dates for this action are not

currently set. As a result, plaintiff’s petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum is

unnecessary. Should the Court set a date for trial, the Court will, sua sponte, issue a writ of

Case 1:02-cv-05003-REC -SMS Document 93 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

habeas corpus ad testificandum. 

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS: 

1. Plaintiff’s Request for Information is GRANTED in that the information requests

has been provided in this Order; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 8, 2005 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

b6edp0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05003-REC -SMS Document 93 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 2