Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00960/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00960-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO KM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ricardo J. Carbajal, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 06-960-PHX-SMM (DKD)

ORDER

On April 5, 2006, Plaintiff Ricardo J. Carbajal, who is confined in the Marana

Community Correctional Treatment Facility in Marana, Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights

Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an uncertified Application to Proceed In Forma

Pauperis (“Application”). (Doc. #1.) On April 18, 2006, the Court issued an Order denying

the Application with leave to file a new, certified Application and certified six-month

account statement. (Doc. #5.)

On June 21, 2006, Plaintiff filed a new Application, but did not submit a six-month

account statement. (Doc. #8.) The Court, on July 27, 2006, denied the new Application with

leave to file a third Application and certified account statement. (Doc. #9.)

Plaintiff filed a third Application on August 3, 2006 (Doc. #10). The third

Application also does not include a six-month account statement as required by 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, the Court will deny the third Application.

Case 2:06-cv-00960-SMM--DKD Document 11 Filed 01/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Because Plaintiff has now twice failed to comply with the Court’s orders that he

submit a certified account statement with a certified Application, this action will be

dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to

comply with a Court order. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992)

(stating a district court may dismiss action for failure to comply with any order of the court).

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff’s August 3, 2006 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc.

#10) is denied.

(2) This action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure for failure to comply with a Court order; the Clerk of Court must enter judgment

and close the case.

DATED this 18th day of January, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00960-SMM--DKD Document 11 Filed 01/18/07 Page 2 of 2