Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02056/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02056-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On November 19, 2015, the Court conducted an informal telephonic conference with counsel 

related to the subpoenas issued by County to Plaintiff’s past employers, to a school she attended and to 

the Kern County Probation Department. At the informal conference, counsel agreed that the records 

would be produced to the Court to conduct an in camera review. All agreed that in the event the Court 

finds records that should be disclosed, it will schedule a further telephonic conference with counsel 

before they are provided to the defense. County’s stated purpose for obtaining the records was that 

they may demonstrate past emotional or psychiatric issues or which could provide a “baseline” for the 

expert’s opinions as to the extent of injury caused by the underlying events. 

The Court has been provided records from Anastase Products, Save Mart Supermarkets and 

Kern County Probation Department. It has not received any records from any school. In any event, 

after review of the records it did receive, the Court has found no records that suggest any alternate 

cause for the claimed emotional injury. However, the Court finds some records from Save Mart 

JANE DOE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-02056 DAD JLT 

ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW

Case 1:13-cv-02056-DAD-JLT Document 47 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Supermarkets, specifically pages 19 through 28, may shed light on her current emotional functioning. 

Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. No later than January 8, 2015, counsel for Plaintiff SHALL lodge a statement to 

JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov (with a cc: to opposing counsel) indicating whether Plaintiff objects to 

disclosure of the documents identified above and, if she does, the grounds therefore. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 22, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-02056-DAD-JLT Document 47 Filed 12/22/15 Page 2 of 2