Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00417/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00417-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CATHY A. REYNOLDS 2008 

REVOCABLE TRUST, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

No. 2:12-cv-0417 JAM DAD

ORDER

On October 31, 2014, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of plaintiffs’ 

motion to compel discovery and defendant’s motion for a protective order. Attorney Daniel Glass 

appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs and attorney Mark Hancock appeared on behalf of the 

defendant. 

Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set 

forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiffs’ motion to compel (Dkt. No. 34) is granted;

2. Defendant’s motion for a protective order (Dkt. No. 36) is denied;

3. The discovery at issue pursuant to the parties’ motions shall be stayed for 30 

days from the date of this order so that defendant may move for reconsideration of this order; and

/////

Case 2:12-cv-00417-JAM-DAD Document 43 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. After the expiration of the 30 days, if defendant’s motion for reconsideration is 

not granted, the stay shall be lifted and defendant shall respond to the discovery at issue within 

fourteen days thereafter. 

Dated: November 5, 2014

DAD:6

Ddad1\orders.civil\reynolds0417.oah.103114.docx

Case 2:12-cv-00417-JAM-DAD Document 43 Filed 11/06/14 Page 2 of 2