Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-00222/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-00222-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C-09-0222-CW 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

IN RE RACKABLE SYSTEMS, INC.

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C-09-0222-CW 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REMOVING CASE FROM 

AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO THE 

ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM 

PURSUANT TO ADR LOCAL RULE 3-

3(c) 

Case 4:09-cv-00222-CW Document 77 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C-09-0222-CW 

WHEREAS, the hearing on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Supplemental Second 

Amended Complaint For Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (“Motion to Dismiss”) is 

scheduled for July 15, 2010 at 2 p.m.; 

WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a Case Management Conference to take place 

immediately following the July 15, 2010 hearing on the Motion to Dismiss; 

WHEREAS, on June 29, 2010, the Court Clerk issued a Notice Re: Noncompliance With 

Court Order (the “Notice”) directing the parties’ counsel to meet and confer “in an attempt to 

agree on an ADR process for this matter. Thereafter, counsel, on behalf of themselves and each 

party, promptly shall file an ADR Certification and either 1) a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 

Selecting ADR Process, or 2) a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference;” 

WHEREAS, the undersigned parties and their counsel have met and conferred as directed 

by the Clerk’s Notice and filed their respective ADR Certifications pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) 

and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b); 

WHEREAS, the undersigned parties agree that the case should be removed from the ADR 

Multi-Option program pursuant to ADR L.R. 3-3(c) because the undersigned parties do not 

believe, at this time, that the Multi-Option program will facilitate resolution of the matter; 

WHEREAS, the parties will discuss ADR options as appropriate on an ongoing basis over 

the course of this litigation, and in the event that the parties elect to pursue ADR options, will 

contact the Court to provide updates and/or seek guidance as such efforts proceed; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate and agree, and respectfully 

request that the Court enter an order that the case should be removed from the ADR Multi-Option 

program. 

Case 4:09-cv-00222-CW Document 77 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C-09-0222-CW 

 

Dated: July 12, 2010 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Meredith N. Landy 

Attorneys for Defendants Rackable Systems, 

Inc., Thomas K. Barton, Madhu Ranganathan 

and Todd R. Ford 

 

Dated: July 12, 2010 

GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Lionel Z. Glancy 

Michael Goldberg 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs 

I, Meredith N. Landy, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Scheduling Matters. In compliance with General 

Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Lionel Z. Glancy has concurred in this filing. 

By: /s/ ________________________ 

 Meredith N. Landy 

O R D E R

STIPULATION IS DECLINED. 

DATED: July 12, 2010 

 The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Judge 

Case 4:09-cv-00222-CW Document 77 Filed 07/12/10 Page 3 of 3