Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00562/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00562-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 The Court notes that discovery in this matter formally closed on April 18, 2008. (See Court’s Scheduling Order,

Doc. No. 36, ¶ 6.) The parties reference a June 6, 2008 discovery deadline, the result of an informal gentleman’s agreement

to extend the April 18, 2008 cutoff date. (See Decl’n of David Brodie in Support of Opposition ¶ 6.) 

1 07cv562-IEG(NLS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROSEMARY RODRIGUEZ-RINCON and

JOHN RINCON as surviving heirs of

ROSEMARY RINCON, deceased,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No.07cv562-IEG(NLS)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX

PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND

DISCOVERY DEADLINES

[Doc. No. 44]

Before the Court in the above-captioned matter is an ex parte motion brought by Plaintiffs

seeking to extend the discovery period in this case by sixty days [Doc. No. 44].1 Defendants oppose the

motion [Doc. No. 47]. Plaintiffs’ counsel asserts several reasons for requesting the extension, but fails

to establish that good cause exists to extend the discovery period in this case. Accordingly, the ex parte

motion is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 11, 2008

Hon. Nita L. Stormes

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cv-00562-MMA-NLS Document 48 Filed 06/11/08 Page 1 of 1