Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-00623/USCOURTS-azd-2_15-cv-00623-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Salvador Sanchez Macias, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-15-00623-PHX-SRB (JFM)

ORDER 

 Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

2254 on April 6, 2015. Petitioner “raises one ground for relief for violation of his Fifth, 

Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights based on the trial court altering the plea 

agreement without the knowledge or agreement of Petitioner, prosecutorial misconduct, 

and denial of the effective assistance of counsel.” (Report and Recommendation at p. 5) 

Respondents filed their Response to Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on 

August 13, 2015. No reply was filed. On November 19, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued 

his Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be dismissed with 

prejudice. 

 In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time 

to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation 

have been filed. 

Case 2:15-cv-00623-SRB Document 17 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. 

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the order of this Court. (Doc. 16) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

and dismissing it with prejudice. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because the dismissal of the Petition is justified 

by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling 

debatable. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

 Dated this 23rd day of December, 2015. 

Case 2:15-cv-00623-SRB Document 17 Filed 12/23/15 Page 2 of 2