Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-5_13-cv-00364/USCOURTS-ared-5_13-cv-00364-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 

PINE BLUFF DIVISION 

LAWRENCE MARTIN PLAINTIFF 

ADC # 106491 

v. Case No. 5:13-cv-00364 KGB/JJV 

CORIZON CORRECTIONAL 

MEDICAL SERVICES, et al. DEFENDANTS 

ORDER 

 Before the Court are two Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United 

States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. Nos. 113, 141). The Court will address each in turn. 

First, the Court has has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted 

by Magistrate Judge Volpe that relate to plaintiff Lawrence Martin’s motion for temporary 

restraining order and motion for order (Dkt. No. 113). The Court also has reviewed Mr. Martin’s 

objections to the recommendation (Dkt. No. 117). After careful review of the recommendation, 

Mr. Martin’s objections, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the 

Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in 

their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 113). The Court denies Mr. 

Martin’s motion for temporary restraining order and motion for order (Dkt. Nos. 102, 104), and 

Mr. Martin’s change of address is noted (Dkt. No. 102). 

 Next, the Court has reviewed the second Proposed Findings and Recommendations 

submitted by Magistrate Judge Volpe that relate to Mr. Martin’s motion for summary judgment 

(Dkt. No. 141). The Court also has reviewed the objections filed by Mr. Martin to that 

recommendation (Dkt. No. 143). After careful review of the recommendation, Mr. Martin’s 

objections, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings 

Case 5:13-cv-00364-KGB Document 175 Filed 02/18/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings 

in all respects (Dkt. No. 141). Mr. Martin’s motion for summary judgment is denied (Dkt. No. 

130). 

The Court denies as moot Mr. Martin’s motion for ruling (Dkt. No. 146). The Court 

certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order 

would not be taken in good faith. 

SO ORDERED this the 18th day of February, 2015. 

 

 _____________________________ 

 Kristine G. Baker 

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:13-cv-00364-KGB Document 175 Filed 02/18/15 Page 2 of 2