Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05372/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05372-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

CROWELL

& MORING LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS 

Daniel A. Sasse (CSB No. 236234)

 dsasse@crowell.com 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor 

Irvine, California 92614 

Telephone: (949) 263-8400 

Facsimile: (949) 263-8414 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Synnex Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

MDL Docket No. 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS

This document relates to: 

Ingram Micro Inc., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LG Electronics, Inc., et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS-JCS 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Hon. Richard Seeborg 

Hon. Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:13-cv-05372-RS Document 75 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 5
CROWELL

& MORING LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -1- 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS 

Plaintiff Synnex Corporation (“Synnex”) and Defendants TEAC Corporation and TEAC 

America, Inc. (collectively, “TEAC”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate 

to a dismissal of this action as to TEAC with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. This 

stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Synnex against any other defendant or alleged 

co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 

Dated: November 21, 2016 CROWELL & MORING LLP 

By: /s/ Daniel A. Sasse 

Daniel A. Sasse 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Synnex Corporation 

Dated: November 21, 2016 KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Aharon S. Kaye 

Mary Ellen Hennessy 

Aharon S. Kaye 

525 W. Monroe Street 

Chicago, IL 60661 

Telephone: 312-902-5200 

maryellen.hennessy@kattenlaw.com 

aharon.kaye@kattenlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TEAC Corporation and TEAC America Inc. 

Case 3:13-cv-05372-RS Document 75 Filed 11/23/16 Page 2 of 5
CROWELL

& MORING LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -2- 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS 

FILER ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the 

United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Daniel A. Sasse, hereby 

attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 

signatories. 

Dated: November 21, 2016 CROWELL & MORING LLP 

By: /s/ Daniel A. Sasse 

Daniel A. Sasse 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Synnex Corporation

 

Case 3:13-cv-05372-RS Document 75 Filed 11/23/16 Page 3 of 5
CROWELL

& MORING LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -3- 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

Honorable Richard G. Seeborg 

United States District Judge 

11/23/16

Case 3:13-cv-05372-RS Document 75 Filed 11/23/16 Page 4 of 5
CROWELL

& MORING LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -4- 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05372-RS-JCS 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

In accordance with Rule 5-5 of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before 

the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Daniel A. Sasse, hereby 

certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that on 

November 21, 2016, a true copy of the above document was filed through the Court’s Case 

Management/Electronic Case Filing (“CM/ECF”) System and served by that System upon all 

counsel of record registered for the System and deemed to have consented to electronic service in 

the above-captioned case. Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail and/or 

first-class mail on the same date. 

Dated: November 21, 2016 CROWELL & MORING LLP 

By: /s/ Daniel A. Sasse 

Daniel A. Sasse 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Synnex Corporation

Case 3:13-cv-05372-RS Document 75 Filed 11/23/16 Page 5 of 5