Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-02819/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-02819-39/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS F., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 12-cv-02819-MMC 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO SUBMIT REPLY MEMORANDUM

Re: Dkt. No. 192

Before the Court is plaintiffs’ “Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Reply 

Memorandum,” filed October 14, 2016, by which plaintiffs seek leave to file their reply 

memorandum regarding the standard of review three days “later than the due date of 

October 14, 2016.”1 Defendant has filed a response thereto. Having read and 

considered the parties’ respective submissions, the Court rules as follows.

Although, as defendant correctly observes, the reply memorandum was due 

September 30, 2016 (see Order filed July 22, 2016), and not October 14, 2016, the Court 

finds it appropriate to exercise its discretion to allow the requested filing, no prejudice to 

defendant having been shown.

Accordingly, plaintiffs’ motion is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 19, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

 

1 On October 16, 2016, plaintiffs filed the above-referenced reply memorandum.

Case 3:12-cv-02819-MMC Document 195 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 1