Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_19-cv-04331/USCOURTS-azd-2_19-cv-04331-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Paris Kyle Minisee,

Petitioner, 

v. 

David Shinn, et al.,

Respondents.

No. CV-19-04331-PHX-NVW-MHB

ORDER

and

DENIAL OF CERTIFICATE OF 

APPEALABILITY AND IN FORMA 

PAUPERIS STATUS

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 

Magistrate Michelle H. Burns (Doc. 21) regarding petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that the 

Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties 

that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 11 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1); Rules 72, 6(a), 6(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and United States v. 

Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Petitioner filed objections on March 

26, 2020 (Doc. 24) and a Notice of Appeal (Doc. 23) to the same effect.

The Court has considered the objections and reviewed the Report and 

Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that 

the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and 

Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the 

Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the meaning 

of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 

Case 2:19-cv-04331-NVW Document 27 Filed 04/06/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, 

the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge (Doc. 21) is accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying 

and dismissing Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 (Doc. 1) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action.

A certificate of appealability is denied because the dismissal of the Petition is 

justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling 

debatable.

Dated this 2nd day of April, 2020.

Case 2:19-cv-04331-NVW Document 27 Filed 04/06/20 Page 2 of 2