Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02070/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02070-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934

---

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: INTRAMTA SWITCHED ACCESS

CHARGES LITIGATION MDL No. 2587

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −1)

On December 16, 2014, the Panel transferred 26 civil action(s) to the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1407. See __F.Supp.2d__ (J.P.M.L. 2014). Since that time, no additional action(s) have

been transferred to the Northern District of Texas. With the consent of that court, all such actions

have been assigned to the Honorable Sidney A Fitzwater.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Texas and assigned to

Judge Fitzwater.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the

Northern District of Texas for the reasons stated in the order of December 16, 2014, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Sidney A Fitzwater.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

Dec 30, 2014

CERTIFIED A TRUE COPY

KAREN MITCHELL, CLERK

ERTIFIED A TRUE COP

AREN MITCHELL, CLER

By s/*SHAKIRA TODD

DEPUTY CLERK

U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF TEXAS

December 30, 2014

Case 3:14-md-02587-D Document 19 Filed 12/30/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID 72

FILED

Jan 06, 2015

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv-02070-KJM-AC Document 26 Filed 01/06/15 Page 1 of 5
IN RE: INTRAMTA SWITCHED ACCESS

CHARGES LITIGATION MDL No. 2587

SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ARIZONA

AZ 2 14−01961 MCI Communications Services Incorporated et al v.

Arizona Telephone Company et al

CALIFORNIA CENTRAL

CAC 2 14−06965 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Mpower

Communications Corp et al

CAC 2 14−09092 CenturyLink Communications, LLC v. Verizon

California Inc.

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 2 14−01257 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Pacific Bell

Telephone Company et al

CAE 2 14−02070 MCI Communications Services, Inc., et al. v. Pac−West

Telecomm, Inc., et al.

COLORADO

CO 1 14−01659 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Level 3

Communications, LLC et al

CONNECTICUT

CT 3 14−00802 Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Southern

New England Telephone Co et al

CT 3 14−01289 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Charter

Fiberlink − Michigan, LLC et al

DELAWARE

DE 1 14−00743 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Verizon

Maryland LLC et al

DE 1 14−01298 Sprint Communication Company LP v. Bright House

Networks Information Services (Alabama) LLC et al

DE 1 14−01439

Opposed 12/29/14

Opposed 12/29/14

Opposed 12/29/14

Case 3:14-md-02587-D Document 19 Filed 12/30/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID 73

Case 2:14-cv-02070-KJM-AC Document 26 Filed 01/06/15 Page 2 of 5
CenturyLink Communications LLC v. Verizon

Delaware LLC et al

FLORIDA MIDDLE

FLM 8 14−02955 Centurylink Communications, LLC v. Verizon Florida,

LLC

ILLINOIS CENTRAL

ILC 2 14−02104 Sprint Communications Company LP v. Illinois Bell

Telephone Company et al

ILC 2 14−02232 Sprint Communications Company v. Surewest

Telephone et al

ILC 3 14−03255 Sprint Communications v. Surewest Kansas

IOWA NORTHERN

IAN 3 14−03028 Sprint Communications Company, LP v. Butler−Bremer

Mutual Telephone Company et al

IAN 3 14−03052 MCI Communications Services, Inc et al v. Breda

Telephone Corp et al

IOWA SOUTHERN

IAS 4 14−00202 Sprint Communications, L.P. v. Citizens Mutual

Telephone Cooperative et al

KENTUCKY WESTERN

KYW 3 14−00615 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v.

Brandenburg Telephone Company et al

MICHIGAN EASTERN

MIE 2 14−12087 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Michigan Bell

Telephone Company et al

MIE 2 14−13464 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Clear Rate

Communications, Inc. et al

MICHIGAN WESTERN

MIW 1 14−00565 Sprint Communications Company, LP v. ACE

Telephone Company of Michigan, Inc. et al

MISSOURI EASTERN

MOE 4 14−00850 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Southwestern

Bell Telephone Company et al

MOE 4 14−01529 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Big River

Telephone Company, LLC et al

MISSOURI WESTERN

Case 3:14-md-02587-D Document 19 Filed 12/30/14 Page 3 of 5 PageID 74

Case 2:14-cv-02070-KJM-AC Document 26 Filed 01/06/15 Page 3 of 5
MOW 5 14−06049 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. K.L.M.

Telephone Company et al

NEBRASKA

NE 4 14−03181 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Arlington

Telephone Company et al

NEVADA

NV 2 14−00905 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Nevada Bell

Telephone Company et al

NEW JERSEY

NJ 2 14−05573 MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. et al v.

ALLEGIANCE TELECOM OF NEW JERSEY et al

NJ 2 14−07318 CENTURYLINK COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v.

VERIZON NEW JERSEY, INC. et al

NEW YORK NORTHERN

NYN 1 14−01103 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Berkshire

Telephone Corporation et al

NEW YORK SOUTHERN

NYS 1 14−03453 Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Verizon New

England, Inc. et al

NYS 1 14−07188 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Alteva of

Warwick LLC et al

NYS 1 14−09376 Centurylink Communications, LLC v. Verizon New

England Inc. et al

NORTH DAKOTA

ND 3 14−00088 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v.

360Networks (USA) Inc. et al

ND 4 14−00065 Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Dakota

Central Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc. et al

OHIO SOUTHERN

OHS 2 14−00610 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Chillicothe

Telephone Company et al

OHS 2 14−01457 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. The

Chillicothe Telephone Company et al

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN

PAW 1 14−00240 MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. et al v.

ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al

SOUTH DAKOTA

Opposed 12/29/14

Opposed 12/29/14

Opposed 12/29/14

Case 3:14-md-02587-D Document 19 Filed 12/30/14 Page 4 of 5 PageID 75

Case 2:14-cv-02070-KJM-AC Document 26 Filed 01/06/15 Page 4 of 5
SD 4 14−04099 Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Alliance

Communications Cooperative, Inc. et al

SD 4 14−04139 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Alliance

Communications Cooperative, Inc. et al

VIRGINIA EASTERN

VAE 1 14−01604 CenturyLink Communications, LLC v. Verizon South,

Inc. et al

WISCONSIN EASTERN

WIE 2 14−00741 Sprint Communications Company LP v. Wisconsin Bell

Inc et al

WISCONSIN WESTERN

WIW 3 14−00464 Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Amherst

Telephone Company et al

WIW 3 14−00667 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. The Stoutland

Telephone Company

Opposed 12/23/14

Opposed 12/23/14

Case 3:14-md-02587-D Document 19 Filed 12/30/14 Page 5 of 5 PageID 76

Case 2:14-cv-02070-KJM-AC Document 26 Filed 01/06/15 Page 5 of 5