Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01266/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01266-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HERBERT MILLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

LES ZIEVE, as Trustee,

Defendant.

No. 2:14-cv-01266-GEB-KJN

FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M) NOTICE

Plaintiff states in his September 12, 2014 Response to 

Order to Show Cause & Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) Notice, in relevant

part: 

To date, Plaintiff’s counsel has been 

unable to serve the defendant. Defendant has 

an active website which identifies his 

business address among his contact 

information. However, when our process 

servicer went to the location indicated on 

the website, he learned that the business is 

permanently closed. Subsequent efforts to 

serve the defendant have been unsuccessful.

(Pl.’s Resp. 2:2-6, ECF No. 7.) 

In light of these representations, Plaintiff is granted 

an extension under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 4(m) 

to effectuate service on Defendant until and including October 

17, 2014. Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) that failure to 

serve Defendant with process by October 17, 2014, may result in 

the action being dismissal for failure of service and/or 

Case 2:14-cv-01266-GEB-KJN Document 8 Filed 10/06/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

prosecution. To avoid dismissal, on or before October 20, 2014,

Plaintiff shall file proof of service or a filing providing 

sufficient explanation why service was not completed within the 

extended service period.

Dated: October 3, 2014

Case 2:14-cv-01266-GEB-KJN Document 8 Filed 10/06/14 Page 2 of 2