Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_94-cv-00671/USCOURTS-caed-2_94-cv-00671-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE 

MOTION TO COMPEL RE DISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES 

AND COSTS FOR 2005, Civ. S-94-0671 LLK/GGH 

BINGHAM, McCUTCHEN, LLP 

KAREN KENNARD – 141925 

KRISTEN A. PALUMBO - 215857 

Three Embarcadero Center 

San Francisco, California 94111-4067 

Telephone: (415) 393-2000 

PRISON LAW OFFICE 

DONALD SPECTER – 83925 

General Delivery 

San Quentin, California 94964 

Telephone: (415) 457-9144 

ROSEN, BIEN & ASARO, LLP 

MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891 

HOLLY BALDWIN – 191317 

ERNEST GALVAN – 196065 

155 Montgomery Street, 8th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone (415) 433-6830 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JERRY VALDIVIA, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK/GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME TO FILE MOTION TO 

COMPEL REGARDING DISPUTED 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR 

2005 

Case 2:94-cv-00671-LKK-GGH Document 1288 Filed 07/06/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE 

MOTION TO COMPEL RE DISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES 

AND COSTS FOR 2005, Civ. S-94-0671 LLK/GGH 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JERRY VALDIVIA, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CIV S-94-0671 LKK/GGH 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE 

MOTION TO COMPEL REGARDING 

DISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND 

COSTS FOR 2005

On July 8, 2004, the District Court established procedures by which plaintiffs are to 

collect periodic attorneys’ fees and costs in this case in connection with their work monitoring 

defendants’ compliance with the Court’s Orders and collecting fees. 

Pursuant to these procedures, the parties completed their meet-and-confer process for 

the Fourth Quarter 2005 fees and costs on May 2, 2006. The total amount of $29,240.50 in 

attorney’s fees remains in dispute from the First, Second, and Fourth Quarters of 2005. In the 

interest of efficiency and judicial economy, the parties stipulate that rather than litigating over 

this amount within 60 days under the periodic fees order, this amount shall remain in dispute, 

and be combined with any disputed items that arise in 2006, to be resolved in a subsequent 

quarterly or annual motion to compel. 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:94-cv-00671-LKK-GGH Document 1288 Filed 07/06/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE 

MOTION TO COMPEL RE DISPUTED ATTORNEYS’ FEES 

AND COSTS FOR 2005, Civ. S-94-0671 LLK/GGH 

2

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 6, 006 

 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON 

United States District Judge

APPROVED AS TO FORM: 

 /s/ Benjamin T. Rice DATED: July 3, 2006 

Benjamin T. Rice 

Deputy Attorney General 

Attorney for Defendants 

/s/ Holly Baldwin DATED: July 3, 2006 

Holly Baldwin 

Rosen, Bien & Asaro, LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 2:94-cv-00671-LKK-GGH Document 1288 Filed 07/06/06 Page 3 of 3