Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06664/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06664-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARDEN CITY BOXING CLUB, )

INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JOSE LUIZ RAZO ALVARADO and )

HORTENCIA ALVARADO, )

individually, jointly and )

dba ALVARADO & CORONA’S DEN, ) 

 )

Defendants. )

 )

1:04-cv-06664-AWI-SMS

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 25)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT (Doc. 19)

Plaintiff is proceeding with an action for statutory damages

for a violation of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.

§§ 553 and 605. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s

application for default judgment against Defendants Jose Luiz

Alvarado and Hortencia Alvarado, individually and doing business

as Alvarado & Corona’s Den.

On May 11, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30)

days from the date of service of that order. To date, the

Case 1:04-cv-06664-AWI -SMS Document 27 Filed 07/10/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation are

supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed May 11, 2007,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Plaintiff’s application for default judgment

against Defendants Jose Luiz Razo Alvarado and Hortencia Alvarado

is GRANTED;

3. Judgment against Defendants Jose Luiz Razo Alvarado and

Hortencia Alvarado, individually and doing business as Alvarado &

Corona’s Den, in the combined amount of $2,500.00 statutory

damages be ENTERED, and the motion is otherwise DENIED;

4. The request for attorney fees and costs is DENIED; and,

5. Defendants Jose Luiz Razo Alvarado and Hortensia

Alvarado be served with a courtesy copy of same as follows:

Jose Luiz Razo Alvarado

Hortensia Alvarado

P.O. Box 601

Biola, CA 93606

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06664-AWI -SMS Document 27 Filed 07/10/07 Page 2 of 2