Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04615/USCOURTS-cand-5_05-cv-04615-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C05-04615 JF (HRL)

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

DAVID J. MICLEAN, State Bar No. 115098 

KATHERINE D. PRESCOTT, State Bar No. 215496 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

500 Arguello St., Suite 500 

Redwood City, CA 94063 

Telephone: (650) 839-5070 

Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 

Email: miclean@fr.com 

 prescott@fr.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AIRDEFENSE, INC. 

MICHAEL LADRA, State Bar No. 064307 

TAIT GRAVES, State Bar No. 197923 

HUONG T. NGUYEN, State Bar No. 217462 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Email: mladra@wsgr.com 

 tgraves@wsgr.com 

 htnguyen@wsgr.com 

 

Attorney for Defendant 

AIRTIGHT NETWORKS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

AIRDEFENSE, INC., 

a Georgia corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AIRTIGHT NETWORKS, INC., 

a California corporation, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C05-04615 JF (HRL) 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

**E-filed 9/28/06**

Case 5:05-cv-04615-JF Document 70 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -1- CASE NO. C05-04615 JF (HRL)

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff AirDefense, Inc. and Defendant 

AirTight Networks, Inc. that all claims in this action are dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1(ii). 

DATED: September 25, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

/S/Charles T. Graves 

By: Charles T. Graves 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AIRTIGHT NETWORKS, INC. 

DATED: September 25, 2006 FISH & RICHARDSON 

/S/Irene Hudson 

By: Irene Hudson 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

AIRDEFENSE, INC. 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED. 

DATED: _______ 

Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9/28/06

Case 5:05-cv-04615-JF Document 70 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CASE NO. C05-04615 JF (HRL)

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Case 5:05-cv-04615-JF Document 70 Filed 09/28/06 Page 3 of 3