Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01660/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-01660-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 TUCKER, CHIU,HEBESHA & WARD PC

642 POLLASKY AVE., STE. 230

CLOVIS, CA 93612

1

STIPULATED AMENDED JUDGMENT

HENRY Y. CHIU 222927

TUCKER, CHIU, HEBESHA & WARD PC

642 Pollasky Avenue, Suite 230

Clovis, California 93612

Telephone: (559) 472-9922

Facsimile: (559) 472-9892

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JUSTIN D. HARRIS 199112

MOTSCHIEDLER, MICHAELIDES ET AL.

1690 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 200

Fresno, California 93711

Telephone: (559) 439-4000

Facsimile: (559) 439-5654

Attorney for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

* * *

BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

ROOFERS LOCAL 27 HEALTH AND 

WELFARE TRUST FUND, NATIONAL 

ROOFING INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, 

ROOFERS LOCAL 27, FRESNO 

ROOFING CONTRACTORS VACATION 

FUND, and ROOFERS LOCAL 27 

APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FRYER ROOFING CO., INC., a California 

corporation; DAVID BRUCE FRYER; 

LEIGH ANN FRYER; INTERNATIONAL 

FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY; 

and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:13-CV-01660-AWI-MJS

STIPULATED AMENDED 

JUDGMENT

///

///

///

Case 1:13-cv-01660-MJS Document 44 Filed 02/17/15 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 TUCKER, CHIU,HEBESHA & WARD PC

642 POLLASKY AVE., STE. 230

CLOVIS, CA 93612

2

STIPULATED AMENDED JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs Boards of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, 

Roofers Local 27, Fresno Roofing Contractors Vacation Fund, and Roofers Local 27 

Apprenticeship Training Fund (collectively, “Stipulating Plaintiffs”),1and defendants Fryer 

Roofing Co., Inc., David Bruce Fryer and Leigh Ann Fryer (collectively, “Fryer Defendants”) 

hereby stipulate, and request an amended judgment, as to the following:

1. Stipulating Plaintiffs and the Fryer Defendants entered into a written “Settlement 

Agreement Between Roofers Local 27 Trust Funds and Fryer Roofing Co., Inc. et al.” 

(“Agreement”) pertaining to the fringe benefit contributions and other charges at issue herein. 

2. The Stipulating Plaintiffs and Fryer Defendants further entered into a Stipulated 

Judgment as part of said Agreement. The Court issued an Order on September 18, 2014, entering 

said Judgment, and retaining jurisdiction to enforce the Agreement and Judgment.

3. The Fryer Defendants, or others on their behalves, have made certain payments 

totaling $136,812.14 toward the Judgment amount, leaving a remainder of $32,918.80. However, 

additional interest and liquidated damages have accrued, and the Stipulating Plaintiffs have 

incurred additional costs and attorneys’ fees in their efforts to enforce the Agreement and 

Judgment as a result of the Fryer Defendants’ breach of the Agreement.

4. The Parties have entered into a written “Amendment to Settlement Agreement 

Between Roofers Local 27 Trust Funds and Fryer Roofing Co., Inc. et al.” (“Amendment”) to 

reflect the additional interest, liquidated damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. The Amendment 

provides, among other things, that the Parties will stipulate to amend the Stipulated Judgment, by 

way of this Stipulated Amended Judgment (“Amended Judgment”), to include those additional 

charges, which the Parties stipulate to be as follows:

///

///

///

 

1

Plaintiff National Roofing Industry Pension Plan is not a party to this Amended Judgment. Its 

claims against Defendants have been dismissed pursuant to a Stipulation and Order to Dismiss 

Claims between the NRIPP and Defendants.

Case 1:13-cv-01660-MJS Document 44 Filed 02/17/15 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 TUCKER, CHIU,HEBESHA & WARD PC

642 POLLASKY AVE., STE. 230

CLOVIS, CA 93612

3

STIPULATED AMENDED JUDGMENT

Prior Remaining Amount Due $32,918.80

Interest (Oct-Dec 2014 Fringes) $525.27

Liquidated Damages (Oct-Dec 2014 Fringes) $6,392.54

Post-Agreement Costs and Attorneys’ Fees $37,044.00

New Amount Due $76,880.61

5. The Amendment further provides that the United States District Court, Eastern 

District of California, Fresno Division, shall continue to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms 

of the Agreement, Amendment and this Amended Judgment.

6. The Amendment further provides that the Parties expressly and irrevocably 

consent to the further jurisdiction of the magistrate judge to enter this Amended Judgment, and to 

issue any findings or orders necessary to enforce the Amendment or Amended Judgment.

7. In the event it becomes necessary to enforce this Amended Judgment, interest 

shall accrue on the Judgment amount at the seven percent (7%) per annum rate specified in the 

collective bargaining agreement. Stipulating Plaintiffs shall be entitled to recover all costs and 

attorneys’ fees incurred by them in enforcing this Amended Judgment.

Dated: February 6 , 2015. FRYER ROOFING CO., INC.

By /s/ David Bruce Fryer

David Bruce Fryer, CEO

Dated: February 6 , 2015. DAVID BRUCE FRYER

By /s/ David Bruce Fryer

David Bruce Fryer, Individually

Dated: February 6 , 2015. LEIGH ANN FRYER

By /s/ Leigh Ann Fryer

Leigh Ann Fryer, Individually

///

Case 1:13-cv-01660-MJS Document 44 Filed 02/17/15 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 TUCKER, CHIU,HEBESHA & WARD PC

642 POLLASKY AVE., STE. 230

CLOVIS, CA 93612

4

STIPULATED AMENDED JUDGMENT

Dated: February 12 , 2015. ROOFERS LOCAL 27 HEALTH AND WELFARE

TRUST FUND

By /s/ Dario Sifuentes

Dario Sifuentes, Trustee

Dated: February 12 , 2015. ROOFERS LOCAL 27

By /s/ Dario Sifuentes

Dario Sifuentes, Business Manager

Dated: February 12 , 2015. FRESNO ROOFING CONTRACTORS

VACATION FUND

By /s/ Dario Sifuentes

Dario Sifuentes, Trustee

Dated: February 12 , 2015. ROOFERS LOCAL 27 APPRENTICESHIP 

TRAINING FUND

By /s/ Dario Sifuentes

Dario Sifuentes, Trustee

Approved as to Form and Content:

Dated: February 6 , 2015. MOTSCHIEDLER, MICHAELIDES, ET AL.

A Limited Liability Partnership

By /s/ Justin D. Harris

JUSTIN D. HARRIS

Attorney for Defendants

Dated: February 12 , 2015. TUCKER, CHIU HEBESHA & WARD

A Professional Corporation

By /s/ Henry Y. Chiu

HENRY Y. CHIU

Attorney for Stipulating Plaintiffs

Case 1:13-cv-01660-MJS Document 44 Filed 02/17/15 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 TUCKER, CHIU,HEBESHA & WARD PC

642 POLLASKY AVE., STE. 230

CLOVIS, CA 93612

5

STIPULATED AMENDED JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT

The Judgment previously entered in Case No. 1:13-CV-01660-AWI-MJS in favor of 

plaintiffs Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Roofers Local 27, Fresno Roofing 

Contractors Vacation Fund and Roofers Local 27 Apprenticeship Training Fund (the “Stipulating 

Plaintiffs” above), and against defendants Fryer Roofing Co., Inc., David Bruce Fryer and Leigh 

Ann Fryer (the “Fryer Defendants” above), jointly and severally, is hereby amended to the 

amount of $76,880.61.

As acknowledged, and stipulated to, by the Parties in the Stipulation above, this amended 

amount judgment reflects: certain payments made by, or on behalf of, the Fryer Defendants; 

additional accrued interest and liquidated damages; and additional costs and attorneys’ fees 

incurred by the Stipulating Plaintiffs in their efforts to enforce the Agreement and Judgment as a 

result of the Fryer Defendants’ breach of the Agreement.

In the event it becomes necessary for Stipulating Plaintiffs to enforce this Amended 

Judgment, they shall further be entitled to interest upon the Amended Judgment amount at seven 

percent (7%) per annum, and all costs and attorneys’ fees incurred by them to do so. 

This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Agreement, Amendment and this 

Amended Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 17, 2015 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-01660-MJS Document 44 Filed 02/17/15 Page 5 of 5