Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-06371/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-06371-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.16-cv-06371-BLF (VKD)

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS

TO FILE CITED EXCERPTS OF HARI

RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION 

TRANSCRIPT

On April 30, 2019, the parties filed a joint discovery dispute letter regarding plaintiff 

Power Integrations, Inc.’s (“PI”) request to compel further Rule 30(b)(6) deposition testimony 

from defendants. Dkt. No. 217. That discovery dispute letter cited to portions of Ajay Hari’s Rule 

30(b)(6) deposition transcript filed under seal. At the Court’s request, defendants lodged the entire 

transcript of Mr. Hari’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. Dkt. No. 249 at 30:8-13. In its order resolving 

the parties’ dispute, the Court cited to portions of Mr. Hari’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition transcript 

that were not previously filed. Dkt. No. 250.

Accordingly, defendants shall file the following additional excerpts of the transcript of Mr. 

Hari’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition by June 11, 2019: pages 80, 177-179, and 364-367. As the Court 

has already concluded that good cause exists to file this material under seal, defendants need not 

file an administrative motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5. Dkt. No. 252.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 4, 2019

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 253 Filed 06/04/19 Page 1 of 1