Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05198/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-05198-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALICIA HARRIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

No. C-08-5198 EMC

ORDER RE TELEPHONIC HEARING

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO AMEND

(Docket Nos. 121, 125)

Currently pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-briefs on what is, in effect,

Plaintiff’s request for leave to amend her complaint. Plaintiffs seeks leave to amend her complaint

to include a claim that she and other class members were not paid for the qualified sales

presentations (“QSPs”) they allegedly performed. Having considered the parties’ briefs and

accompanying submissions, as well as all other evidence of record, the Court hereby orders as

follows.

(1) The Court shall hold a telephonic conference call on the matter on April 2, 2010, at

2:30 p.m. The parties shall immediately contact the Courtroom Deputy, Betty Lee, at (415) 522-

2034 to provide telephone numbers for participating counsel.

(2) By 12:00 p.m. of April 1, 2010, Plaintiff shall file and serve a statement describing

in detail the discovery she wishes to take to support the QSP claim for purposes of class

certification. Plaintiff must be specific, both in terms of the written discovery and oral discovery. In

addition, if Plaintiff believes that a sampling is sufficient for purposes of class certification, then she

Case 3:08-cv-05198-EMC Document 127 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

must provide details as to what would constitute an adequate sampling. Plaintiff should not only efile but also fax a copy to the Court at (415) 522-4200.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2010

_________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05198-EMC Document 127 Filed 03/30/10 Page 2 of 2