Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04993/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04993-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order; 13-CV-04993 VC 

DM1\5616521.2

Julie A. Vogelzang (SBN 174411)

Edward M. Cramp (SBN 212490) 

Courtney L. Baird (SBN 234410) 

Jess R. Booth (SBN 245430) 

DUANE MORRIS LLP

750 B Street, Suite 2900 

San Diego, CA 92101-4681 

Telephone: 619 744 2200 

Facsimile: 619 744 2201 

E-mail: jvogelzang@duanemorris.com 

 emcramp@duanemorris.com 

 clbaird@duanemorris.com 

 jrbooth@duanemorris.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

B&H EDUCATION, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JACQUELINE BENJAMIN, BRYAN GONZALEZ 

and TAIWO KOYEJO, Individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

B&H EDUCATION, INC., a corporation, dba 

“MARINELLO SCHOOLS OF BEAUTY”; and 

DOES 1 through 100 

Defendants. 

Case No.: 13-CV-04993 VC

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING 

SCHEDULE FOR FILING CROSSMOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AND PROPOSED 

ORDER 

Ctrm: 4 

Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria 

AS MODIFIED

Case 3:13-cv-04993-VC Document 73 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order; 13-CV-04993 VC 

DM1\5616521.2

Plaintiffs JACQUELINE BENJAMIN, BRYAN GONZALEZ and TAIWO KOYEJO 

(“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, and Defendant B&H EDUCATION, INC. 

(“Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendant intend to file cross-motions for summary judgment in 

this matter. 

WHEREAS, the Court has a standing order requiring that parties filing cross-motions for 

summary judgment “file a total of four briefs sequentially, rather than three pairs of simultaneous 

briefs.” The Court’s standing order further encourages parties to “submit a stipulation and proposed 

order setting a briefing schedule for the cross-motions, which will likely be signed so long as the 

fourth brief is due no later than 14 days before the hearing date.” 

WHEREAS, the Case Management Order [dkt. 62] currently provides that all cross-motions 

for summary judgment are due on June 16, 2015. 

WHEREAS, in accordance with the Court’s standing order, counsel for the parties have met 

and conferred and jointly propose the following schedule for the filing of the cross-motions for 

summary judgment: 

DATE MOTION 

June 16, 2015 Plaintiffs File Motion for Summary Judgment 

July 14, 2015 Defendant Files Opposition Memorandum and 

Motion for Summary Judgment 

August 11, 2015 Plaintiffs File Opposition and Reply Memorandum 

August 25, 2015 Defendant Files Reply Memorandum 

September 17, 2015 Hearing on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment 

Case 3:13-cv-04993-VC Document 73 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3 

Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order; 13-CV-04993 VC 

DM1\5616521.2

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: May 14, 2015 DUANE MORRIS LLP

 By: /s/ Jess R. Booth 

Julie A. Vogelzang 

Edward M. Cramp 

 Courtney L. Baird 

Jess R. Booth 

Attorneys for Defendant 

B&H EDUCATION, INC. 

Dated: May 14, 2015 RUDY, EXELROD, ZIEFF & LOWE, LLP

 By: /s/ Chaya M. Mandelbaum 

David A. Lowe 

 Chaya M. Mandelbaum 

 Michelle G. Lee 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

JACQUELINE BENJAMIN, PATRICIA CAULEY, 

BRYAN GONZALEZ and TAIWO KOYEJO 

 

Case 3:13-cv-04993-VC Document 73 Filed 05/19/15 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4 

Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order; 13-CV-04993 VC 

DM1\5616521.2

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Upon consideration of the Joint Stipulation Regarding Schedule for Filing Cross-Motions for 

Summary Judgment and Proposed Order between Plaintiffs and Defendant and good cause shown 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

The Case Management Order [dkt. 62] is amended to reflect the jointly stipulated schedule 

for submitting cross-motions for summary judgment as follows: 

DATE MOTION 

June 16, 2015 Plaintiffs File Motion for Summary Judgment 

July 14, 2015 Defendant Files Opposition Memorandum and 

Motion for Summary Judgment 

August 11, 2015 Plaintiffs File Opposition and Reply Memorandum 

August 25, 2015 Defendant Files Reply Memorandum 

September 17, 2015 Hearing on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: ______________________________________ 

 HON. VINCE CHHABRIA 

AS MODIFIED 24 May 19, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Vince Chhabria

Case 3:13-cv-04993-VC Document 73 Filed 05/19/15 Page 4 of 4