Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01358/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01358-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1145 E.R.I.S.A.

---

DeFazio, et al., v. Hollister, et al., Case No. CIV.S 04-1358 WBS GGH 

Stipulation to Amend Plaintiffs’ Complaint 

- 1 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Eastern District Of California 

Jim DeFazio, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

Hollister, Inc., et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

CIV. S 04-1358 WBS GGH 

Stipulation to Amend the 

Plaintiff’s Complaint and 

[Proposed] Order Thereon 

Complaint Filed: July 15, 2004 

Lynn Hubbard III, SBN 69773 

Scottlynn J Hubbard IV, SBN 212970 

Law Offices of Lynn Hubbard 

12 Williamsburg Lane 

Chico, CA 95926 

Telephone: (530) 895-3252 

Facsimile: (530) 894-8244 

Attorney for Plaintiffs Jim DeFazio, Theresa Beetham, Brenda Dimaro, 

DeLane Humphries, Hallie Lavick, Michael McNair, Sonya Pace, Judy 

Seay, Nancy Russell Stanton, and Cindy Wirth 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 220 Filed 06/26/07 Page 1 of 3
DeFazio, et al., v. Hollister, et al., Case No. CIV.S 04-1358 WBS GGH 

Stipulation to Amend Plaintiffs’ Complaint 

- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

In light of the new evidence relating to the Eleventh Count of the SAC 

– i.e., the lending of money or other extension of credit between the Plan and 

a party in interest – and the withdrawal of plaintiffs’ counter-motion for 

partial summary judgment regarding the ERISA § 406(a)(1)(B) claim, 

(docket nos. 203 and 190, respectively), the parties hereby stipulate to the 

following:

1. Plaintiffs will be allowed to amend the allegations in a third amended 

complaint (TAC); 

2. Defendants will execute a waiver of service regarding the TAC; 

3. Plaintiffs shall file and serve the TAC no later than June 30, 2007; and 

4. Defendants shall not be required to respond to the previously-filed 

Second Amended Complaints. Defendants shall have no less than 60 

days (August 29, 2007) to file and serve responsive pleadings to the 

TAC. 

It is so stipulated. 

Dated: June 18, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD 

 /s/ Scottlynn J Hubbard IV, esq. /

 SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV 

Attorney for Plaintiffs DeFazio, Beetham, Dimaro, 

Humphries, Lavick, McNair, Pace, Seay, Stanton, 

and Wirth 

Dated: June 19, 2007 PORTER SCOTT APC 

 /s/ Martin N. Jensen, esq. /

 MARTIN N. JENSEN 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff Ellis 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 220 Filed 06/26/07 Page 2 of 3
DeFazio, et al., v. Hollister, et al., Case No. CIV.S 04-1358 WBS GGH 

Stipulation to Amend Plaintiffs’ Complaint 

- 3 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: June 19, 2007 SCHUYLER ROCHE AND ZWIRNER 

 /s/ L. Andrew Brehm, esq. /

 L. ANDREW BREHM 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: June 19, 2007 ADDUCCI DORF LEHNER MITCHELL 

AND BLANKENSHIP 

 /s/ James D. Adducci, esq. /

 JAMES D. ADDUCCI 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: June 19, 2007 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

 /s/ James W. Ducayet, esq. /

 JAMES W. DUCAYET 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

Order

Good cause having been shown, Plaintiffs request to amend the complaint is 

hereby granted. 

Dated: June 25, 2007

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 220 Filed 06/26/07 Page 3 of 3