Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00490/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00490-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD DAVID JONES,

Plaintiff,

 v.

P. MASTERANGLO, #12771; S.

DERRICO #43107; T. A. BEERS,

#46894; JOHN DOE; G. A. KELLY; M.

J. NIMROD; N. GRANNIS; and R. J.

KIRKLAND,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-0490 PJH (PR)

SCHEDULING ORDER

This is a civil rights case filed pro se by a state prisoner. In the initial review order

the court ordered service on defendants Masteranglo, Derrico, and Beers. The claims

against the other defendants were dismissed with leave to amend and subsequently

dismissed with prejudice when plaintiff did not amend.

A motion to dismiss by Masteranglo, Derrico, and Beers was granted as to all claims

except the medical claims against Beers. The dismissal was with leave to amend; plaintiff

has not amended, so all remaining claims except the medical claim against Beers are now

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

In order to expedite the resolution of this case, the court orders as follows:

1. No later than sixty days from the date this order is entered, Beers shall file a

motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. If he is of the opinion that this

case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the court prior to the

date his summary judgment motion is due. 

2. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion, if any, shall be filed with the court

Case 4:06-cv-00490-PJH Document 51 Filed 09/14/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and served upon defendant no later than thirty days from the date the motion was served

upon him. Plaintiff should note the warnings given him in the initial review order pursuant

to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 953-954 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), Klingele v.

Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988), and Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108,

1120 n. 4 (9th Cir. 2003).

3. If defendant wishes to file a reply brief, he shall do so no later than fifteen days

after the opposition is served upon him. 

4. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No

hearing will be held on the motion unless the court so orders at a later date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2007. 

 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\PJH\CR.06\JONES490.NOAMEN.wpd 

Case 4:06-cv-00490-PJH Document 51 Filed 09/14/07 Page 2 of 2