Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05778/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05778-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

CHERYL D. ORR (State Bar No. 143196) 

HEATHER M. SAGER (State Bar No. 186566) 

CHERYL A. SABNIS (State Bar No. 224323) 

50 Fremont Street,20th Floor 

San Francisco, Callfomia 94105-2235 

Telephone: 415) 591 7500 

Facsimile: ($15) 591-?510 

E-mail: che 1 orr dbr com 

-corn 

cheryl.sabnis@,dbr.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

RGIS LLC, formerly known as RGIS INVENTORY SPECIALISTS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TRISHA WREN, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

RGIS INVENTORY SPECIALISTS, 

Defendant. 

Case Nos. C06 5778 JCS and 

C07-0032 JCS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED 

ORDER TO EXTENSION OF TIM k TO 

PERMIT DEPOSITIONS IN ADVANCE 

OF OPPOSITION AND REPLY 

BRIEFING REGARDING 

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO 

FACILITATE NOTICE 

[Civ. L.R. 6-l(b), 6-2 and 7-12] 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-l(b), 6-2, and 7-12, the parties file this Stipulation 

and [Proposed] Order continuing the opposition and reply deadlines and the hearing date 

on Plaintiffs' Motion to Facilitate Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 5 216(b) ("Motion"). 

Following receipt and review of Plaintiffs' Motion and the declarations Plaintiffs 

filed in support of it, Defendant noticed the depositions of five (5) of the declarants. 

Defendant intended to take these depositions in time to timely file its opposition to the 

Motion by August 15,2007 (the current deadline). Plaintiffs have agreed to make the 

DRINXER Bm~a RFAD~LLP 

MFremonlSlreet Mh Ran 

San Fmti~co, CA 94105 // STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME TO PERMIT DEPOSITIONS IN ADVANCE OF OPPOSITION 

AND REPLY BRIEFING REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FACILITATE NOTICE 

SFIUS7MWl CASENOS. C06 5778 JCS AND C07-0032 JCS 

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS Document 107 Filed 08/09/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

2 1 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DNNI(ERBIOOLE& Rurnu~ 

53 Fmrmnl Steel, 201h Fh 

Sa Franclrco CA 9Plffi 

SF! 387b48 1 

declarants available for deposition, but are unable to do so before the August 15 deadline 

for Defendant's opposition. As such, the parties have met and conferred regarding a 

further extension of the briefing schedule on this Motion so that Defendant may take the 

noticed depositions before the deadline for its Opposition. 

Because Plaintiffs have indicated a desire to depose individuals providing 

declarations that Defendant may submit with its opposition, the parties have built into this 

extended briefing schedule time for Plaintiffs to take some such depositions before the 

deadline for their reply. Defendant hereby agrees to produce a reasonable number (to be 

agreed to by the parties) of current employees for deposition if they are noticed by 

Plaintiffs and if said deponents wish to be represented by RGIS' counsel or are otherwise 

a PMK or agent of RGIS. RGIS further agrees to free the work schedules of a 

reasonable number of employees who are scheduled for deposition whether said 

employees are represented by RGIS' counsel or not. 

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to the following deadlines relative to 

Plaintiffs' Motion: 

Defendant's opposition filed by August 29,2007, with a stipulated page limit not 

to exceed 28 total pages in the points and authorities, matching the pages in 

Plaintiffs moving papers; and 

Plaintiffs' reply filed by September 21,2007. 

The hearing on the Motion will take place on October 19,2007 at 9:30 a.m., or at 

such other date and time ordered by the Court. (The parties had intended to set the 

hearing for October 5,2007, but the Court is unavailable on that day. Defense counsel is 

unavailable on the next hearing date, October 12,2007.) 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

L 

STlPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME TO PERMIT DEPOSITIONS IN ADVANCE OF OPPOSITION AND 

REPLY BRIEFING REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FACILlTATE NOTICE 

CASENOS. C06 5778 JCS AND C07-0032 JCS 

NOVEMBER 9, 2007

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS Document 107 Filed 08/09/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

2 1 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DAINIERBI~E~ RUTHIII 

50 Frernmt Swet 20h Fh 

San Francsm. CA 94105 

SF1 387MS I 

Dated: August 7,2007 SCHNEIDER & WALLACE 

Attome for Plaintiffs CYNTX~A PIPER, et nl. 

Dated: August 7,2007 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 

CHERYL D. ORR 

Attorneys for Defendant 

RGIS LLC, formerly known as 

RGIS INVENTORY SPECIALISTS 

CERTIFICATION 

I attest that Guy B. Wallace has concurred in the filing of this document. 

Dated: August 2 2007 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 

CHERYL &/d JJ. ORR a. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ,2007 

THE HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO 

United States Magishate Judge 

- 

STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME TO PERMIT DEPOSITIONS IN ADVANCE OF OPPOSITION AND 

REPLY BRIEFING REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FACILITATE NOTICE 

CASENOS. C06 5778 JCS AND C07-0032 JCS 

August 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:06-cv-05778-JCS Document 107 Filed 08/09/07 Page 3 of 3