Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03249/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03249-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Trademark Infringement

---

SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C 06-3249 MHP 

 TO AMEND JUDGMENT BY CONSENT OF THE PARTIES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I BRAUN DEGENSHEIN (SBN 138832) 

email: info@ibdlaw.com 

Attorney at Law 

81 Skyway Lane 

Oakland, California 94619 

Telephone: (510) 553-9669 

Facsimile: (510) 633-1900 

Attorney for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

PRINCESS PAPER, INC. 

HARVEY SISKIND LLP 

IAN K. BOYD (SBN 191434) 

email: iboyd@harveysiskind.com 

RAFFI V. ZEROUNIAN (SBN 236388) 

email: rzerounian@harveysiskind.com 

Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 354-0100 

Facsimile: (415) 391-7124 

LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP, LLP 

Paul C. Van Slyke (pro hac vice) 

email: pvanslyke@lockeliddell.com 

Tanya Chaney (pro hac vice) 

email: tchaney@lockeliddell.com 

Nathan Dunn (pro hac vice) 

email: ndunn@lockeliddell.com 

3300 Chase Tower, 600 Travis 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 226-1406 

Facsimile: (713) 223-3717 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff SYSCO CORP. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PRINCESS PAPER, INC. 

 

 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant. 

vs. 

SYSCO CORP. 

 

 Defendant/Counterplaintiff. 

Case No.: C 06-3249 MHP 

SECOND STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND 

JUDGMENT BY CONSENT OF THE 

PARTIES

 

Case 3:06-cv-03249-MHP Document 35 Filed 12/04/07 Page 1 of 3
- 1 - 

 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C 06-3249 MHP 

 TO AMEND JUDGMENT BY CONSENT OF THE PARTIES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Princess Paper, Inc. (“Princess” or “Princess Paper”) and 

Defendant/Counterplaintiff Sysco Corporation (“Sysco”), through their counsel, hereby stipulate to 

amend the May 15, 2007 Stipulation and Order Entering Judgment by Consent of the Parties (Paper # 

30) as follows: 

Paragraph 15 of the Order is amended to add the following: 

After beginning the process for manufacturing the new printing plates by the initial 

manufacturer designated by Sysco, Sysco shall have the right to require that Princess use another 

manufacturer of its selection to complete the manufacture of new printing plates upon payment to 

Princess of the sum of $35,000 in full satisfaction of its obligation to pay for the cost of manufacture 

and shipping of the new plates. Sysco will pay the cost of all artwork and other costs incurred to date 

with the initial manufacturer and will instruct the initial manufacturer to provide to Princess without 

charge to Princess any artwork and other work product prepared for Princess that is in its possession 

that would assist Princess in making new printing plates with another manufacturer. 

Paragraph 22 of the Order is amended to read as follows: 

Princess Paper may continue to sell and exhaust its inventory of products on which the 

IMPERIAL mark is used until July 31, 2008. To the extent that Princess Paper has not exhausted its 

inventory on or before July 31, 2008, Princess Paper shall immediately thereafter cease selling its 

IMPERIAL paper products in their old-style wrappers, packages and cartons and either destroy any 

remaining inventory of such products or repackage such remaining inventory to comply with the 

redesign terms of this Order. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: /s/ 

I. Braun Degenshein

81 Skyway Lane 

Oakland, CA 94619 

Attorney for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

Princess Paper, Inc. 

Case 3:06-cv-03249-MHP Document 35 Filed 12/04/07 Page 2 of 3
- 2 - 

 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C 06-3249 MHP 

 TO AMEND JUDGMENT BY CONSENT OF THE PARTIES 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: /s/ 

Paul C. Van Slyke (pro hac vice) 

Tanya Chaney (pro hac vice) 

Nathan Dunn (pro hac vice) 

LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP, LLP 

3300 Chase Tower, 600 Travis 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff 

Sysco Corporation 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 _____________________________________ 

The Honorable Marilyn H. Patel 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

December 3, 2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-03249-MHP Document 35 Filed 12/04/07 Page 3 of 3