Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-01022/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-01022-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CV 08-1022 JF

Application for Issuance of Order to Show Cause;

[Proposed] Order

Robert B. Jobe (Cal. State Bar #133089)

Sara E. Coppin (Cal. State Bar #245952)

LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT B. JOBE

550 Kearny Street, Suite 200 

San Francisco, CA 94108

(415) 956-5513 (phone)

(415) 840-0308 (fax)

Attorneys for Petitioner,

Satinderpal Singh.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SATINDERPAL SINGH, ) No. CV 08-1022 JF

) DHS Alien Number: A 75-306-564

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

LT. DAVID SEPULVEDA, JAIL ) APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE 

ADMINISTRATOR, SANTA CLARA ) OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; 

COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ) [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CORRECTION; ET AL., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

Petitioner, Satinderpal Singh (“Mr. Singh”), hereby requests the Court to grant his

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus or, alternatively, to issue an order directing Respondents to

show cause why his petition should not be granted. This request is based on the following

grounds:

1. 28 U.S.C. § 2243 requires that “[a] court, justice, or judge entertaining an 

application for a writ of habeas corpus shall forthwith award the writ or issue an order directing

the respondent to show cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the

application that the application or person detained is not entitled thereto.” 

2. On February 20, 2008, Mr. Singh filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, in 

which he alleged that he was being unlawfully detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1225 & 1226(c). 

Because Mr. Singh’s petition raises a substantial challenge to the lawfulness of his ongoing 

Case 5:08-cv-01022-JF Document 5 Filed 03/31/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CV 08-1022 JF

Application for Issuance of Order to Show Cause;

[Proposed] Order

detention, the Court should immediately order Respondents to show cause why the Writ should

not be granted, within the next ten (10) days. 28 U.S.C. § 2243. 

Date: March 5, 2008 Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT B. JOBE

/s/ Robert B. Jobe

_______________________________

Robert B. Jobe

Counsel for Petitioner

Case 5:08-cv-01022-JF Document 5 Filed 03/31/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 CV 08-1022 JF

[Proposed] Order to Show Cause

Robert B. Jobe (Cal. State Bar #133089)

Sara E. Coppin (Cal. State Bar #245952)

LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT B. JOBE

550 Kearny Street, Suite 200 

San Francisco, CA 94108

(415) 956-5513 (phone)

(415) 840-0308 (fax)

Attorneys for Petitioner,

Satinderpal Singh.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SATINDERPAL SINGH, ) No. CV 08-1022 JF

) DHS Alien Number: A 75-306-564

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

LT. DAVID SEPULVEDA, JAIL ) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ADMINISTRATOR, SANTA CLARA ) 

COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ) 

CORRECTION; ET AL., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

Based upon the Application for Issuance of Order to Show Cause, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that Respondents show cause within the next ten (10) days as to why 

Petitioner’s Writ should not be granted.

Dated this_____________day of_______________, 2008.

________________________________

JEREMY FOGEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

--------------------

27th March

Case 5:08-cv-01022-JF Document 5 Filed 03/31/08 Page 3 of 3