Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00225/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00225-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Wilbur Atcherley (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, filed on February 17, 2012. The 

action is currently in the discovery phase, with a discovery deadline of September 29, 2014. 

The Court recently granted Plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended Complaint to name 

various Doe Defendants.

On September 25, 2014, Plaintiff filed a “request” in which he asks the Court to note that he 

was not served with Defendants’ August 1, 2014, opposition to his motion to amend. Plaintiff states, 

however, that he accepts the Court’s order on his request to amend.

WILBUR ATCHERLEY,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12cv00225 LJO DLB (PC)

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST 

TO BE SERVED WITH DEFENDANTS’ 

OPPOSITION

(Document 126)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 

SEND PLAINTIFF A COPY OF DOCUMENT 102

Case 1:12-cv-00225-LJO-DLB Document 128 Filed 09/26/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A review of Defendants’ opposition, filed on August 1, 2014, reveals that it was served on 

Plaintiff, at his place of incarceration, on August 1, 2014. While Plaintiff may not have received the 

opposition, Defendants appear to have properly served it.

The Court will not order Defendants to reserve the opposition. To ensure that Plaintiff has 

relevant documents filed in this action, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of 

Defendants’ August 1, 2014, opposition (Document 102).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2014 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00225-LJO-DLB Document 128 Filed 09/26/14 Page 2 of 2