Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00658/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00658-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK RICHARD O’DELL, ) 

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

INYO CO. SHERIFFS DEPT., )

et al., ) 

 )

Defendants. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-00658-OWW-SMS 

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO REVOKE

PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STATUS (DOC. 8) 

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with an action concerning

alleged civil rights violations. The matter has been referred to

the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local

Rules 72-302 and 72-304.

On August 7, 2006, the undersigned Magistrate Judge filed

findings and a recommendation that Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis

status be revoked. The findings and recommendations were served

on all parties on the same date.

On September 6, 2006, Plaintiff filed objections to the

findings and recommendation. The undersigned has considered the

objections and has determined there is no need to modify the

Case 1:06-cv-00658-OWW -SMS Document 10 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

findings and recommendations based on the points raised in the

objections. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo th

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the findings and recommendation are

supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, it IS ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 7, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The Court exercises its discretion TO REVOKE Plaintiff’s

in forma pauperis status and his privilege to proceed without

prepayment of costs and fees; and

3. Plaintiff IS DIRECTED to proceed to serve the summons and

first amended complaint.IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 22, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00658-OWW -SMS Document 10 Filed 09/26/06 Page 2 of 2