Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00625/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00625-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE

ASSOCIATION,

No. CIV S-10-0625 LKK DAD PS

Plaintiff,

v.

RICHARD WEYENBERG, et al., ORDER SETTING STATUS

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

Defendants. CONFERENCE

 /

In response to plaintiff’s complaint, defendant Richard Weyenberg filed a copy of

a letter addressed to plaintiff’s counsel. Defendant Richard Weyenberg indicated that he and his

wife, co-defendant Juanita Weyenberg, are not represented by counsel and cannot afford to hire

counsel. Defendant Richard Weyenberg subsequently filed a document that has been construed

as an answer to plaintiff’s complaint. By order filed April 26, 2010, United States District Judge

Lawrence K. Karlton referred the case to the undersigned for all purposes encompassed by Local

Rule 302(c)(21). The status conference previously set for May 17, 2010, has been vacated.

Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT

IS ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday June 25, 2010, at

11:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 27, before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.

Case 2:10-cv-00625-LKK -DAD Document 16 Filed 04/27/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Each party shall appear at the Status Conference by counsel or, if proceeding in

propria persona, on his or her own behalf. A party may appear at the status conference

telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom

deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128 no later than 48 hours before the

Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference.

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before June 11, 2010. 

Defendants shall file and serve a status report on or before June 18, 2010. Each status report

shall address all of the following topics:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Any expected or desired amendment of the

pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof,

including disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including the setting of

appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and law and

motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial

conference and trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures

specified by the rules due to the relative simplicity

or complexity of the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any other case,

including matters in bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate

judge assigned to this matter acting as settlement

judge, waiving any disqualifications by virtue of his

so acting, or whether they prefer to have a

Settlement Conference before another judge; 

k. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed

before a United States Magistrate Judge; and

/////

Case 2:10-cv-00625-LKK -DAD Document 16 Filed 04/27/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

l. Any other matters that may aid in the just and

expeditious disposition of this action.

4. Defendants are informed that a party proceeding in propria persona may

represent himself or herself but may not represent any other party who is proceeding in propria

persona. Both defendants must participate in the status conference, and both defendants must

sign any document filed in this action on behalf of the defendants. Defendants are cautioned that

failure to file and serve a timely status report, failure to appear at the status conference, or any

other failure to comply with a court order or applicable rule may result in an order imposing an

appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110 and 183.

DATED: April 27, 2010.

DAD:kw

Ddad1\orders.prose\FNMA0625.ossc2

Case 2:10-cv-00625-LKK -DAD Document 16 Filed 04/27/10 Page 3 of 3