Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01152/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01152-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER LEE JENKINS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1152 MCE GGH P

vs.

J.G. ARCEO, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action 

filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By concurrently filed order, this court has found this 

amended complaint sets forth some cognizable claims against certain defendants. However, for 

the majority of the defendants and claims, this court finds dismissal appropriate for the reasons

extensively set forth in the court’s order filed on December 12, 2005.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

1. Plaintiff’s claims against J. Valadez, Vincent Cullen, Glen Riddle, V. Sanchez,

J.G. Arceo, Tony Loftin, N. Grannis, J.L. Schmidt, M. P. Gallagher, C. Semel, S. Ortiz, T.

Surges, James L. Deason, S.O. Kephart, B. Curry, L. H. Dizung, J. Valdez, M. Veal, Crawford,

Duncan, L. Buccinio, A. Swanson, Nadim K. Khoury, P. Enriquez, Dizmang, J. M. August, D. L.

Turner, Dr. H. Hasheem, M. Hodges, Dr. Pacifico, Sgt. T. Winters, Joyce Thompson, K.L.

Case 2:04-cv-01152-MCE -GGH Document 35 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Kirpinsky, M. Hodges-Wilkens, F. Gonzalez, R. Grenz, C/O Summers, Counselor Dominquez,

Lance Jensen, C/O Whitten, D. Shankland, J. Stocker, M. Bradley, J. Bick, R. Meyers, D.

Myers, R. Carney, M. Cry, Sgt. Goddard, Sgt. Stevens, Dr. Beck, Robert McGahey, Dr. Diznang,

Jeff Griffin, D. M. Cornez , J.E. Boyd, Counselor Dominguez, Counselor Ochoa, C. Buckley,

Harley G. Lapin, C/O Furnari, C/O Guy, J.C. Sanders be dismissed and these parties be

dismissed as defendants in this action; and 

2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants C/O Wilson, Sgt. Pemberton, Sgt. Foster

be dismissed with the exception of those specific colorable claims set forth both in the court’s

December 12, 2005 order and in the concurrently filed order as to defendants Wilson, Pemberton

and Foster.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court's order. Martinez v.Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 4/18/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

jenk1152.fr

Case 2:04-cv-01152-MCE -GGH Document 35 Filed 04/18/06 Page 2 of 2