Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-00886/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-00886-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Emil Airapetian, )

)

 Petitioner, )

) 

v. ) CV 05-886 PHX FJM (VAM)

)

Philip Crawford, et al., ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 )

)

 Respondents. )

TO THE HONORABLE FREDERICK J. MARTONE, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE.

Emil Airapetian ("petitioner"), filed a pro se Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241. Petitioner

raises one ground for relief in the petition. (Doc. 1 at p. 5 and

Attachment). In lieu of an answer, respondents filed a

"SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS" and "SUPPLEMENT TO SUGGESTION OF

MOOTNESS." (Docs. 10 and 9).

BACKGROUND

 Petitioner states he was ordered removed to Armenia in

September, 2004. (Doc. 1 at p. 5; Doc. 3 at p. 1). Petitioner

states that he has remained in government custody post-removal for

more than the permissible 180 days outlined by the U.S. Supreme

Court in Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). (Doc. 1 at

Attachment).

 

Case 2:05-cv-00886-FJM Document 11 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

DISCUSSION

 In lieu of contesting petitioner's request for relief,

respondents filed a "SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS" and "SUPPLEMENT TO

SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS" stating that petitioner has been released

from custody and, therefore, the petition is now moot. (Docs. 10

and 9). To support their contention the habeas petition is moot,

respondents have attached copies of an "Order of Supervision"

dated June 29, 2005, and other documents showing petitioner was

released from ICE custody in Phoenix, Arizona subject to certain

conditions. (Doc. 9 at Attachments). In light of the fact

petitioner's habeas claim challenges only his continued detention

pending execution of the order of removal, and in light of

petitioner's release from detention, the habeas claim is moot. 

 IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that the "SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS"

is well-taken and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied

as moot.

 This Report and Recommendation is not an order that is

immediately appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any

notice of appeal filed pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of

Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the

District Court's order and judgment. The parties shall have ten

(10) days from the date of service of this Report and

Recommendation within which to file specific written objections. 

Thereafter, the parties shall have ten (10) days within which to

file a response to the objections. Failure to timely file

objections to any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge

will be considered a waiver of a party's right to de novo

Case 2:05-cv-00886-FJM Document 11 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

consideration of the factual issues and will constitute a waiver

of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in

an order or judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's

Report and Recommendation.

DATED this 19th day of September, 2005.

Case 2:05-cv-00886-FJM Document 11 Filed 09/19/05 Page 3 of 3