Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-114/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ Case No. 07-5944 SC 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS MDL No. 1917 

ALDO A. BADINI (257086) 

JEFFREY L. KESSLER (pro hac vice) 

A. PAUL VICTOR (pro hac vice) 

EVA W. COLE (pro hac vice) 

MOLLY M. DONOVAN (pro hac vice) 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

200 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10166-4193 

Telephone: (212) 294-6700 

Facsimile: (212) 294-7400 

Email: jkessler@winston.com 

STEVEN A. REISS (pro hac vice) 

DAVID L. YOHAI (pro hac vice) 

ADAM C. HEMLOCK (pro hac vice) 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, New York 10153-0119 

Telephone: (212) 310-8000 

Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 

Email: steven.reiss@weil.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Panasonic Corporation of North America, MT Picture Display Co., Ltd., 

and Panasonic Corporation (f/k/a Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

Case No. 07-5944 SC 

MDL. No. 1917 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PANASONIC DEFENDANTS’ 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SEAL DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO 

CIVIL LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 79-

5(c)

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION 

)

) 

)

This Document Relates to: 

INDIRECT-PURCHASER ACTIONS 

On March 25, 2013, Defendants Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North 

America, and MT Picture Display Co. Ltd. (collectively, “Panasonic Defendants”) filed the 

following documents: 

(1) Defendants’ Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Strike the 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1612 Filed 03/26/13 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 – 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PANASONIC DEFENDANTS’ Case No. 07-5944 SC 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS MDL No. 1917 

Proposed Expert Testimony of Dr. Janet S. Netz; 

(2) Declaration of Eva W. Cole in Support of Defendants’ Reply Memorandum of Law in 

Support of Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Proposed Expert Testimony of Dr. Janet S. 

Netz (“Cole Reply Declaration”); 

(3) Exhibits 1 through 7 attached to the Cole Reply Declaration; and 

(4) Rebuttal Declaration of Professor Robert D. Willig in Support of Defendants’ Motion to 

Strike the Proposed Expert Testimony of Dr. Janet S. Netz (“Willig Rebuttal 

Declaration”). 

With respect to these documents, the Panasonic Defendants also filed an Administrative 

Motion to Seal Documents Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(c) (“Motion to Seal”) 

seeking leave to file these documents, or portions thereof, under seal. 

On March 25, 2013, the Panasonic Defendants filed the Declaration of Eva W. Cole in 

Support of the Motion to Seal. 

After due consideration of the papers submitted, the Court’s previously entered Protective 

Order, and the Court’s file in this matter, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED THAT the Motion to Seal is GRANTED with respect to those portions of Defendants’ 

Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Proposed Expert 

Testimony of Dr. Janet S. Netz, the Cole Reply Declaration and Exhibits and the Willig Rebuttal 

Declaration identified by Panasonic Defendants in the Declaration of Eva W. Cole in Support of the 

Motion to Seal. 

1. The Clerk shall place in the public record the following documents: 

i. The redacted version of Defendants’ Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of 

Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Proposed Expert Testimony of Dr. Janet S. Netz as 

lodged by Panasonic Defendants on March 25, 2013; 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1612 Filed 03/26/13 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 3 – 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PANASONIC DEFENDANTS’ Case No. 07-5944 SC 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS MDL No. 1917 

ii. The redacted versions of the Cole Reply Declaration as lodged by Panasonic 

Defendants on March 25, 2013; 

iii. The redacted version of Exhibits 1 through 7 attached to the Cole Reply Declaration 

as lodged by Panasonic Defendants on March 25, 2013; and 

iv. The redacted version of the Willig Rebuttal Declaration as lodged by Panasonic 

Defendants on March 25, 2013. 

All other documents filed under seal by the Panasonic Defendants on March 25, 2013 shall remain 

under seal. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to maintain the effect of the seal under Civil Local Rule 

79-5(f), the parties, their counsel, and their declarants shall not publicly disseminate or discuss any 

of the sealed documents or their contents absent further order of the Court. 

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

Dated:___________________ _____________________________________________ 

Hon. Charles A. Legge 

Special Master 

IT IS SO ORDERED UPON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER. 

Dated:___________________ _____________________________________________ 

Hon. Samuel Conti 

United States District Judge 

March 26, 2013

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1612 Filed 03/26/13 Page 3 of 3