Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01758/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01758-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

Stipulation to Dismiss- 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Todd M. Friedman, Esq. (216752) 

Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. 

324 S. Beverly Dr., #725 

Beverly Hills, CA 90212 

Phone: (877) 206-4741 

Fax: (866) 633-0228 

tfriedman@AttorneysForConsumers.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARLON MONTOYA, Individually, 

And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly 

Situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

FMS INVESTMENT CORP.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:15-cv-01758-WHA

JOINT STIPULATION OF 

DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE AS TO THE NAMED 

PLAINTIFF AND WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE AS TO THE 

PUTATIVE CLASS

NOW COME THE PARTIES by and through their attorneys to respectfully 

move this Honorable Court to dismiss this matter with prejudice as to the named 

Plaintiff, and without prejudice as to the Putative Class alleged in the complaint, 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear 

their own costs and attorney fees. A proposed order has been concurrently 

submitted to this Court. 

The notice and approval requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

23(e) are inapplicable to the parties’ settlement and dismissal of this putative 

class action because this action has not been certified as a class.1 

 

1

 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e) states “[t]he claims, issues or defenses of a certified class may be settled, 

voluntarily dismissed, or compromised only with the Court’s approval.”

Case 3:15-cv-01758-WHA Document 39 Filed 11/19/15 Page 1 of 3
Stipulation to Dismiss- 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The Parties agree that this Court can proceed to dismiss this Action entirely 

with prejudice as to the Named Plaintiff and without prejudice as to the Putative 

Class alleged in the complaint. 

 

Respectfully submitted this 12th day of November, 2015 

 

 By: s/Todd M. Friedman, Esq. 

TODD M. FRIEDMAN 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 By: s/Damian P. Richard, Esq. 

DAMIAN P. RICHARD 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 3:15-cv-01758-WHA Document 39 Filed 11/19/15 Page 2 of 3
Order to Dismiss - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARLON MONTOYA, Individually, 

And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly 

Situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

FMS INVESTMENT CORP.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:15-cv-01758-WHA

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties 

this matter is dismissed with prejudice as to the named Plaintiff, and without 

prejudice as to the Putative Class alleged in the complaint, pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear their own costs and 

attorneys’ fees. 

 Dated this __day of November, 2015. 

 

 

 _______________________________ 

 The Honorable William Alsup

19th

Case 3:15-cv-01758-WHA Document 39 Filed 11/19/15 Page 3 of 3