Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01039/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01039-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAMMY SALING,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEITH ROYAL, Sheriff of Nevada

County, California; GAYLE

SATCHWELL, Former Director of Human

Resources, Nevada County,

Defendants.

No. 2:13-cv-1039-TLN-EFB PS

ORDER

On September 9, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed September 9, 2015, are 

ADOPTED.

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, ECF No. 40, is 

granted as follows: 

Case 2:13-cv-01039-TLN-EFB Document 75 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

a. Plaintiff’s first (“Intrusion Into Seclusion (Privacy) Under Equal Protection”), 

third (“Retaliation Termination”), fourth (“Harassment in violation of Title VII”) and 

seventh (“Civil Conspiracy”) causes of action are dismissed with leave to amend; 

b. Plaintiff’s state law claims are dismissed with prejudice and without leave to 

amend. 

3. Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s due process claim is denied.

4. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file a second 

amended compliant as provided in the magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendations. The 

second amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned to this case and must be

labeled “Second Amended Complaint.” Should Plaintiff fail to timely file a second amended 

complaint, this action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s due process claim.

Dated: September 29, 2015

Case 2:13-cv-01039-TLN-EFB Document 75 Filed 09/30/15 Page 2 of 2