Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01602/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-01602-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Dana and Janet McLorn,

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Fleetwood Motor Homes of Indiana, Inc.,

d/b/a/ American Coach and Beaudry RV

Company, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-1602-PHX-LOA

ORDER

This case arises upon Defendant Beaudry RV Company’s (“Beaudry”) Notice

of Filing Bankruptcy, filed on December 2, 2008, advising the Court and all parties that

Defendant Beaudry filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy

Court, No. BK-08-16533-EWH, on November 18, 2008. (docket # 23)

By virtue of the automatic stay imposed under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1) with the

filing of a bankruptcy petition, all pending matters against Defendant Beaudry will be

stayed until further order of the Court. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1); O’Donnell v. Vencor Inc.,

466 F.3d. 1104 (9th Cir. 2006).

On the Court’s own motion,

IT IS ORDERED hereby staying this lawsuit against Defendant Beaudry

ONLY and placing it on inactive status until June 1, 2009 (180 days).

This lawsuit against Defendant Beaudry ONLY will be dismissed on June

1, 2009 (180 days) pursuant to Rule 41(b) (lack of prosecution) unless prior to the

Case 2:08-cv-01602-LOA Document 24 Filed 12/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

scheduled dismissal date Plaintiff demonstrates in writing that Plaintiff has moved to lift

the stay in the bankruptcy court but the request has not been ruled upon or has been

denied; or Plaintiff has sought to reduce the claim(s) against the subject debtor Beaudry to

judgment in the bankruptcy court in an adversary proceeding and the adversary proceeding has not yet been adjudicated despite Plaintiff’s due diligence in seeking its resolution;

or Plaintiff has timely demonstrated a reasonable basis for continuance of this lawsuit

against Defendant Beaudry on inactive status.

Any party may ask the Court to schedule an informal status conference

before the 180-day period expires to inform the Court what action, if any, has been

undertaken in the bankruptcy court that would permit this lawsuit against Defendant

Beaudry to proceed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the lawsuit/case against all other

Defendants shall proceed as scheduled, Duval v. Gleason, 1990 WL 261364 (N.D. Cal.

1990), unless a motion to stay the entire case is timely filed and granted. Matter of

Lockard, 884 F.2d 1171, 1179 (9th Cir. 1989) (citing generally A.H. Robins Co., Inc. v.

Piccinin, 788 F.2d 994, 999 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 876 (1986) (automatic

stay imposed under § 362(a)(1) is generally available only to the bankrupt and not to

non-debtor third parties or co-defendants.).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all counsel shall use proper

capitalization in all future captions as mandated by LRCiv 7.1(a)(3).

Dated this 3rd day of December, 2008

Case 2:08-cv-01602-LOA Document 24 Filed 12/04/08 Page 2 of 2