Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01887/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01887-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COALITION OF HUMAN ADVOCATES FOR

K9'S AND OWNERS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-06-1887 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPY IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On September 15, 2006, plaintiff electronically filed its First Amended Complaint. 

Plaintiff has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s standing orders, however, by failing

to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day

that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name,

case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also

Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the Court’s

order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court may impose

sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any electronically-filed

Case 3:06-cv-01887-MMC Document 43 Filed 09/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 22, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01887-MMC Document 43 Filed 09/22/06 Page 2 of 2