Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00116/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00116-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\DOCS\SHU\DSHU2\inBOX\Signed\Stipulation(2).wpd

LAW O FFICES

KRIN G & CH U NG , LLP

2151 RIVER PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 310

SACR AM EN T O, CALIFORN IA 95833

TELEP HONE (916) 564-7000

Shane Singh, Attorney Bar No. 202733

Attorneys for Defendant DKM & RKM Investments, LP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GERALD COHEN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DKM & RKM INV, LP

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-000116-WBS-DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER

REGARDING TIME TO FILE

RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND STATUS

(PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The Plaintiff GERALD COHEN and Defendant DKM & RKM INV, LP hereby Stipulate

and Agree by and between their respective counsel that:

1) Defendant DKM & RKM INV, LP was personally served with the Summons and

Complaint on February 19, 2006.

2) Defendant DKM & RKM INV, LP retained counsel on March 8, 2006. 

3) Counsel for DKM & RKM INV, LP has reviewed the Commercial Real Estate

Lease agreement that is in effect regarding the property that is the subject of this

litigation and is of the belief that certain indemnity obligations are owed to

Defendant DKM & RKM INV, LP by an entity that is not part of this litigation. 

Case 2:06-cv-00116-WBS-DAD Document 6 Filed 03/20/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\DOCS\SHU\DSHU2\inBOX\Signed\Stipulation(2).wpd 2

4) Counsel for Defendant RKM & DKM INV, LP is of the belief that this other entity

would be a proper party to this case and counsel is working diligently to tender

defense and if appropriate have this other entity be a part of this matter. 

5) Plaintiff GERALD COHEN and DKM & RKM INV, LP jointly request that the

time for DKM & RKM INV, LP to file a responsive pleading be continued to April

14, 2006.

6) The parties also jointly request that the Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Conference

set for April 10, 2006 be continued to a date in which the parties shall have a

meaningful opportunity to meet and to develop a discovery plan. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: March 15, 2006 THOMAS N. STEWART, III, ATTORNEY AT

LAW

By: /s/ Tomas N. Stewart, Esq.

THOMAS N. STEWART

Attorney for Plaintiff, GERALD COHEN

DATED: March 15, 2006 KRING & CHUNG, LLP

By: /s/ Shane Singh, Esq.

SHANE SINGH

Attorney for Defendant DKM & RKM INV,

LP

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:06-cv-00116-WBS-DAD Document 6 Filed 03/20/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\DOCS\SHU\DSHU2\inBOX\Signed\Stipulation(2).wpd 3

 FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

 1) Defendant DKM & RKM INV, LP have until April 14, 2006 in which to file a 

 responsive pleading. 

 2) The Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Conference is continued to June 5, 2006 at

 9:00 a.m. before the undersigned Judge in Courtroom 5. 

DATED: March 17, 2006

Case 2:06-cv-00116-WBS-DAD Document 6 Filed 03/20/06 Page 3 of 3