Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-03756/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-03756-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

A/73401638.1/3005231-0000321690 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL C07-03756 RMW 

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP 

Christopher P. Berka (SBN 94911) 

chris.berka@bingham.com 

Holly Pearson (SBN 226523) 

holly.pearson@bingham.com 

1900 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2223 

Telephone: 650.849.4400 

Facsimile: 650.849.4800 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

Michael E. Molland (SBN 111830) 

mmolland@morganlewis.com 

Benjamin P. Smith (SBN 197551) 

bpsmith@morganlewis.com 

Aaron S. Dutra (SBN 216971) 

asdutra@morganlewis.com 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: 415.442.1000 

Facsimile: 415.442.1001 

CREECH, LIEBOW & KRAUS 

Randall C. Creech (SBN 65542) 

rcreech@sjlegal.com 

333 West San Carlos Street, Suite 1600 

San Jose, CA 95110 

Telephone: 408.993.9911 

Facsimile: 408.993.1335 

Attorneys for Defendant 

OLIN CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

OLIN CORPORATION; and DOES 1-10, 

inclusive, 

Defendants. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM 

No. C07-03756 RMW 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

*E-FILED - 6/24/10*

Case 5:07-cv-03756-RMW Document 302 Filed 06/24/10 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

A/73401638.1/3005231-0000321690 2 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL C07-03756 RMW 

The Santa Clara Valley Water District (the “District”) and Olin Corporation 

(“Olin”), stipulate to the following: 

WHEREAS, on July 20, 2007, the District filed a Complaint against Olin in this 

action; 

WHEREAS, on October 18, 2007, the District filed a First Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, on November 1, 2007, Olin filed a Counterclaim against the District; 

WHEREAS, on March 16, 2009, Olin filed a First Amended Counterclaim. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through 

their designated counsel that Case No. C07-03756 RMW, in its entirety, including the 

Complaint, First Amended Complaint, Counterclaim, and First Amended Counterclaim, be and 

hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each 

party will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

DATED: June 8, 2010 

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

By: /s/Christopher P. Berka 

Christopher P. Berka 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER 

DISTRICT 

DATED: June 8, 2010 

Creech, Liebow & Kraus 

By: /s/Randall C. Creech 

Randall C. Creech 

Attorneys for Defendant 

OLIN CORPORATION 

Case 5:07-cv-03756-RMW Document 302 Filed 06/24/10 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

A/73401638.1/3005231-0000321690 3 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL C07-03756 RMW 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _____________, 2010 

THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

6/23

Case 5:07-cv-03756-RMW Document 302 Filed 06/24/10 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

A/73401638.1/3005231-0000321690 CV 08-04703 SI 

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT 

CERTIFICATION BY CHRISTOPHER P. BERKA PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 

NO. 45, SECTION X. RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

1. I am a lawyer licensed to practice law in the State of California, and am a partner 

in the law firm of Bingham McCutchen LLP, counsel for Plaintiff Santa Clara Valley Water 

District. The statements herein are made on my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness I 

could and would testify thereto. 

2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that 

concurrence has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared 

document with the Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support 

this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon 

request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct on June 8, 2010. 

 /s/ Christopher P. Berka 

 Christopher P. Berka 

Case 5:07-cv-03756-RMW Document 302 Filed 06/24/10 Page 4 of 4