Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01658/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01658-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 31:3729 False Claims Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NO. CIV.S-03-1658 LKK DAD PS

ex rel. GENE L. ROGERS, M.D.,

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

This matter came before the court on September 16, 2005,

for hearing on defendants’ motion to compel and plaintiff’s crossmotion for protective order. Plaintiff Gene L. Rogers, M.D.,

proceeding pro se, appeared on his own behalf. Claire I. Van Dam,

Deputy County Counsel, appeared as counsel for defendants County of

Sacramento, et al. Having considered all written materials filed in

connection with the motions, and after hearing oral argument, for the

reasons discussed on the record during the hearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:03-cv-01658-LKK -DAD Document 112 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. Defendants’ motion to compel is granted in part. 

Plaintiff shall verify in writing under oath those interrogatory

answers interlineated on his version of the joint statement regarding

discovery dispute filed on September 13, 2005. Plaintiff shall also

make available for inspection and copying those collections of

documents identified on the record during the hearing. Defendants

shall have an opportunity to inspect those documents at a reasonable

time prior to plaintiff’s deposition. In the event a discovery

dispute arises at plaintiff’s deposition, the parties may contact the

court by telephone to obtain a ruling on any such dispute. The

parties shall contact Pete Buzo at (916) 930-4128 in this regard.

2. Plaintiff’s cross-motion for protective order is

denied.

DATED: September 20, 2005.

DAD:th

Ddad1\orders.prose\rogers1658.091605

Case 2:03-cv-01658-LKK -DAD Document 112 Filed 09/21/05 Page 2 of 2