Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00298/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-00298-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

____________________________________________________________________________________________

1

STIP. FOR FILING OF SAC, DISMISSAL OF CAL. CIV. CODE § 2923.5 CLAIM, AND REMOVAL OF 

MSJ HEARING FROM CALENDAR; ORDER

Molsby & Bordner, LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CAMERON D. BORDNER, ESQ. (236312)

bordner@mobolaw.com

MOLSBY & BORDNER, LLP

10280 Donner Pass Road

Truckee, CA 96161

Tel: (530) 214-8700

Fax: (530) 214-8158

ROBIN D. SHOFNER, ESQ. (272552)

shofner@mobolaw.com

MOLSBY & BORDNER, LLP

1830 15th Street, Suite 100

Sacramento, CA 95811

Tel: (916) 447-0529

Fax: (916) 848-3500

Attorneys for Plaintiffs:

THOMAS A. WEBER; and

BELINDA G. WEBER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

THOMAS A. WEBER and BELINDA G. 

WEBER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PNC BANK, N.A.; HSBC BANK, U.S.A., 

N.A.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:13-cv-00298-TLN-CKD

STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT, DISMISSAL OF

CAL. CIV. CODE § 2923.5 CLAIM, AND 

REMOVAL OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT HEARING FROM 

CALENDAR; ORDER

Removed: February 15, 2013

JOINT STIPULATION

Plaintiffs THOMAS A. WEBER and BELINDA G. WEBER (collectively “Plaintiffs”) 

and Defendants PNC BANK, N.A. and HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A. as Trustee for Luminent 

Case 2:13-cv-00298-TLN-CKD Document 46 Filed 06/17/14 Page 1 of 4
____________________________________________________________________________________________

2

STIP. FOR FILING OF SAC, DISMISSAL OF CAL. CIV. CODE § 2923.5 CLAIM, AND REMOVAL OF 

MSJ HEARING FROM CALENDAR; ORDER

Molsby & Bordner, LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mortgage Trust 2007-2 (collectively, “Defendants”), (collectively “the Parties”) by and through 

their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on January 14, 2013, in Placer County Superior 

Court, Case No.: SCV0032361;

2. The underlying issue of this action is the potential foreclosure of the subject 

property located at 8972 Bronson Drive, Granite Bay, California 95746 (the “Subject 

Property”). 

3. On February 15, 2013, Defendants filed a Notice of Removal of Action with the

United States District Court, Eastern District of California (Sacramento Division) and the 

above-mentioned case was assigned Case No.: 2:13-cv-00298-GEB-CKD.

4. On May 30, 2014 Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment to be heard 

on July 3, 2014. The Motion for Summary Judgment addressed Plaintiffs’ sole claim for 

violation of California Civil Code § 2923.5. 

5. Plaintiffs seek to file a Second Amended Complaint (SAC) based on allegations 

that Defendants violated various California statutes in connection with the modification and 

appeal review process for the Subject Loan. These purported violations occurred in May 2014. 

(A true and correct copy of the SAC is attached as Exhibit 1.) The SAC no longer contains a 

cause of action for violation of California Civil Code § 2923.5, which Plaintiffs seek to dismiss 

with prejudice. (Id.) 

6. Defendants deny all allegations within the SAC but desire to have all matters 

between the Parties litigated fully in the present case.

7. The Parties agree by and between their respective attorneys of record that 

Plaintiff may file the SAC attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 

8. The Parties agree by and between their respective attorneys of record that the 

California Civil Code § 2923.5 claim will be dismissed with prejudice. 

9. The Parties agree by and between their respective attorneys of record that the

Motion for Summary Judgment hearing will be rendered moot and should be removed from the 

Court’s calendar. 

Case 2:13-cv-00298-TLN-CKD Document 46 Filed 06/17/14 Page 2 of 4
____________________________________________________________________________________________

3

STIP. FOR FILING OF SAC, DISMISSAL OF CAL. CIV. CODE § 2923.5 CLAIM, AND REMOVAL OF 

MSJ HEARING FROM CALENDAR; ORDER

Molsby & Bordner, LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10. This stipulation will not result in prejudice to any party and its impact on judicial 

proceedings is not expected to be significant.

11. Nothing in this stipulation shall constitute a waiver of any arguments or defenses 

that Plaintiffs or Defendants may wish to assert in their pleadings, all of which are expressly 

reserved.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their 

respective attorneys of record that Plaintiffs may file a Second Amended Complaint, a copy of 

which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1, the California Civil Code § 2923.5 claim is dismissed 

with prejudice and the pending Motion for Summary Judgment is moot and should be removed 

from the Court’s calendar. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 16, 2014 MOLSBY & BORDNER, LLP

 

 /s/ Robin D. Shofner

 Robin D. Shofner, Esq.

 Attorney for Plaintiffs

 THOMAS A. WEBER and BELINDA G. WEBER

Dated: June 16, 2014 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP

/s/ Andrew A. Bao

Andrew A. Bao, Esq.

Heather S. Kim, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant

PNC BANK, N.A., and HSBC BANK, U.S.A., 

N.A.; as Trustee for Luminent Mortgage Trust 

2007-2 (erroneously sued as “HSBC BANK, 

U.S.A., N.A.”)

///

///

///

///

Case 2:13-cv-00298-TLN-CKD Document 46 Filed 06/17/14 Page 3 of 4
____________________________________________________________________________________________

4

STIP. FOR FILING OF SAC, DISMISSAL OF CAL. CIV. CODE § 2923.5 CLAIM, AND REMOVAL OF 

MSJ HEARING FROM CALENDAR; ORDER

Molsby & Bordner, LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The Court having considered the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that:

Plaintiffs may file a Second Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as 

Exhibit 1, within five (5) days of this Order, the California Civil Code § 2923.5 claim is 

dismissed with prejudice and the pending Motion for Summary Judgment is moot and will be 

removed from the Court’s calendar. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 16, 2014

Case 2:13-cv-00298-TLN-CKD Document 46 Filed 06/17/14 Page 4 of 4