Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-00228-63/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

5:13-cv-00228-RMW

ORDER RESETTING DATES OF FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ADIL HIRAMANEK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

L. MICHAEL CLARK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:13-cv-00228-RMW 

ORDER RESETTING DATES OF 

FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND 

TRIAL

Re: Dkt. Nos. 601, 602

The parties were unable to agree on any of the dates the court offered to hold the final 

pretrial conference in this matter. Accordingly, the final pretrial conference for plaintiffs’ claims 

against defendant Miller will be held on Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 6. 

Furthermore, to avoid any risk that a separate trial scheduled the week of July 18, 2016 will 

conflict with the instant case and to allow the parties adequate time to prepare, the jury trial on 

plaintiffs’ claims against defendant Miller will begin on Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 8:30 a.m.

The court is scheduling the pretrial conference a month in advance to allow the parties sufficient 

time to clear any conflicts they have in their schedules.

The court will set time limits for trial at the pretrial conference. For planning purposes, the 

court anticipates that jury selection will take 2-3 hours (including 10 minutes per side for 

questions to the jury). The court further anticipates allowing approximately 8 hours of trial time 

Case 3:13-cv-00228-JD Document 629 Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 2
2

5:13-cv-00228-RMW

ORDER RESETTING DATES OF FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

per side, not including jury selection or closing arguments.

The court is aware of plaintiffs’ concern with having adequate time to prepare between the 

pretrial conference and trial. The court will endeavor to share its tentative rulings on motions in 

limine and other pertinent issues with the parties by the time of the pretrial conference, if not 

beforehand. To the extent possible, the parties should meet and confer and attempt to resolve any 

logistical issues in advance of the pretrial conference. In particular, by June 30, 2016, the parties 

shall alert the court as to which issues enumerated on pages 6 and 7 of plaintiffs’ amended joint 

pretrial statement, Dkt. No. 611, will still require resolution by the court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 17, 2016

______________________________________

Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-00228-JD Document 629 Filed 06/17/16 Page 2 of 2