Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05383/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05383-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFRED PAUL GALAZ, 

 

Petitioner,

 

 v. 

 

C. HARRISON, Warden, 

 

Respondent.

______________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:04-cv-05383-TAG HC

 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

JUDICIAL NOTICE (Doc. 47)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 27, 2007, the Court issued an order denying the First Amended

Petition on its merits. (Doc. 42). The Court entered judgment the same date. (Doc. 43). On May 14,

2007, Petitioner moved for an extension of time to file “objections” to the order, which the Court denied

as moot on May 23, 2007. (Docs. 44, 45). Nevertheless, Petitioner filed objections to the order on May

30, 2007. On June 22, 2007, Petitioner filed the instant motion for the Court to take judicial notice of

the reasons why his objections were not filed at an earlier date. (Doc. 47). Petitioner then appealed the

denial of his petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which denied issuance

of a certificate of appealability on September 7, 2007. (Doc. 54). 

Case 1:04-cv-05383-TAG Document 56 Filed 02/13/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

When the Court issued a ruling denying the instant petition on the merits and entering

judgment, that action concluded the case and there were no provisions, either by statute or in the rules of

court, for the filing of objections by Petitioner at that point. 

Petitioner’s request for judicial notice is moot since judgment has been entered and his

appeal of this Court’s denial of his petition has been rejected by the Ninth Circuit. 

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Petitioner’s motion for judicial notice

(Doc. 47), is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 13, 2008 /s/ Theresa A. Goldner 

j6eb3d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:04-cv-05383-TAG Document 56 Filed 02/13/08 Page 2 of 2