Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01082/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01082-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

ANTHONY M. GALVEZ,

NO. CIV. S-05-1082 WBS-JFM

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

TYCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

et al,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

Counsel for plaintiff has filed an ex parte application

for an extension of time to file plaintiff’s response to

defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Counsel for defendant

has filed an opposition to the application. The court would not

do defendant any favor by denying plaintiff’s request. There is

no doubt - no doubt whatsoever - that any order of this court

granting summary judgment in favor of defendant without affording

plaintiff even an extra 30 days to respond would be summarily

reversed for abuse of discretion. This would only result in

unnecessary costs and delay to all parties, including defendant.

///

Case 2:05-cv-01082-WBS -JFM Document 21 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The hearing on defendant’s motion for summary judgment

is therefore continued to May 15, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff’s

opposition and defendant’s reply shall be filed in accordance

with the applicable Local Rules associated with that date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 7, 2006

Case 2:05-cv-01082-WBS -JFM Document 21 Filed 04/07/06 Page 2 of 2