Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-mc-80212/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-mc-80212-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Winner’s motion is supported by a declaration in which Winner refers to the

existence of a subpoena duces tecum.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL WINNER,

Movant,

 v.

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION,

Respondent /

No. C-07-80212 MISC MMC

ORDER DIRECTING MOVANT TO

SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR ORDER

PURSUANT TO CUSTOMER

CHALLENGE PROVISIONS OF RIGHT

TO FINANCIAL PRIVACY ACT 

The Court is in receipt of movant Michael Winner’s (“Winner”) “Motion for Order

Pursuant to Customer Challenge Provisions of the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978,”

filed August 29, 2007. By said motion, Winner seeks an order, pursuant to 12 U.S.C.

§ 3410, “preventing the Government from obtaining access to [Winner’s] financial records.” 

(See Mot. at 1:17-18.)

Section 3410 provides that “a customer may file a motion to quash an administrative

summons or judicial subpena, or an application to enjoin a Government authority from

obtaining financial records pursuant to a formal written request.” See 12 U.S.C. § 3410(a). 

Winner, however, has not provided a copy of any administrative summons, judicial

subpena, or formal written request issued by respondent Inspector General of the National

Science Foundation.1

Case 3:07-mc-80212-MMC Document 2 Filed 09/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, Winner is hereby DIRECTED to supplement the instant motion by filing,

no later than September 14, 2007, a copy of the administrative summons, judicial subpena,

or formal written request to which his motion is directed. Further, Winner is hereby

DIRECTED to submit, no later than September 14, 2007, a proposed form of order setting

forth the specific relief he seeks.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 4, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-mc-80212-MMC Document 2 Filed 09/04/07 Page 2 of 2