Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05450/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05450-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

Stipulation and Order re Enlarging Time to File Opposition and Reply to Summary Judgment

Kelleher v. Kelleher, Norther Dist. Court Case No. 13-5450

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kenneth Frucht, SBN 178881

Frederick J. Geonetta, SBN 114824

Geonetta & Frucht LLP

100 Montgomery Street, 16th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 392-4844

Facsimile: (415) 392-7973

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMBER KELLEHER,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JOHN E. KELLEHER, et al,

Defendants.

ddd

D

CASE NO. CV 13-5450

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER 

ENLARGING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION 

AND REPLY BRIEFS TO AMBER 

KELLEHER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

(L.R. 6-2, et seq.)

Courtroom: B, 15th Fl.

Judge: Hon. Maria-Elena James

Action Filed: November 25, 2013

Trial Date: None

WHEREAS, counsel for the Plaintiff Amber Kelleher and Defendant John “Jack” Kelleher, all 

other parties having been dismissed, have met and conferred regarding the timing of briefing for 

Amber Kelleher’s motion for summary judgment noticed for hearing on July 2, 2015; and 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s moving papers were filed on May 21, 2015, opposition papers are therefore 

due on Thursday, June 4, 2015, reply is due June 11; and 

Case 3:13-cv-05450-MEJ Document 114 Filed 06/03/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Stipulation and Order re Enlarging Time to File Opposition and Reply to Summary Judgment

Kelleher v. Kelleher, Norther Dist. Court Case No. 13-5450

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, the parties agree that it would be in the interest of justice to enlarge the time for filing 

opposition by one week and the reply briefs by four days; and

WHEREAS, the parties further agree that no prejudice would result from the proposed change

WHEREAS, no other change has been requested or made, and the proposed change will have no 

other effect on the schedule of the case;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1) Any opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment currently set to be heard on July 2, 

2015 shall be filed by June 11, 2015; and

2) Any reply shall be filed by June 15, 2015; and

3) There will be no change to the July 2, 2015 hearing date or time.. 

Dated: June 3, 2015

By: /s/ Frederick J. Geonetta

FREDERICK J. GEONETTA

By: /s/ Jay D. Adkisson 

JAY D. ADKISSON

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,

Dated:

By: _____________________

District Court Judge

June 3, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Maria-Elena James

Case 3:13-cv-05450-MEJ Document 114 Filed 06/03/15 Page 2 of 2