Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-md-01793/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-md-01793-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RELATE CASES

Master File No. 06-cv-1793-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MAYER BROWN LLP

Richard J. Favretto, Esq.

rfavretto@mayerbrown.com

John Roberti, Esq.

jroberti@mayerbrown.com

1909 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: (202) 263-3000

Facsimile: (202) 263-3300

MAYER BROWN LLP

Edward D. Johnson, Esq. (SBN 189475)

wjohnson@mayerbrown.com

J. Joann Liao, Esq. (SBN 227329)

jliao@mayerbrown.com

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300

3000 El Camino Real

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112

Telephone: (650) 331-2000

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060

Attorneys for Defendant United Air Lines, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re INTERNATIONAL AIR

TRANSPORTATION SURCHARGE

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ALL ACTIONS.

Master File No. 06-cv-1793-CRB

MDL No. 1793

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO RELATE CASES

Case 3:06-md-01793-CRB Document 217 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RELATE CASES

Master File No. 06-cv-1793-CRB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On December 28, 2007, Plaintiff in the action Adlin v. Air New Zealand, et al., Northern

District Case No. C-07-06410-EDL (“Adlin”), filed a Motion for Administrative Relief to

Consider Whether Cases Should be Related, seeking to relate the Adlin case to the abovecaptioned proceeding. Plaintiff failed to serve the motion on known parties to the purportedly

related actions, as required by Civil Local Rule 3-12(b). Plaintiff also improperly filed the

motion in his own action, rather than in this action, which is the earlier-filed action.

On January 7, 2008, Defendant United Air Lines, Inc. filed an Opposition to this

administrative motion.

Upon consideration of the papers and pleadings on file, and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the administrative motion seeking to relate the Adlin action to

this action is DENIED.

DATED: _______________, 2008

___________________________________

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

United States District Judge

January 09

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-md-01793-CRB Document 217 Filed 01/10/08 Page 2 of 2