Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03667/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03667-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION BRIEFING

CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER, ESQ. (SBN 197117)

chamner@hamnerlaw.com

AMY T. WOOTTON, ESQ. (SBN 188856)

awootton@hamnerlaw.com 

EVELINA SERAFINI, ESQ. – Of Counsel (SBN 187137)

eserafini@hamnerlaw.com

HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC

555 W. 5th Street, 31st Floor

Los Angeles, California 90013

Telephone: (213) 533-4160

Facsimile: (213) 533-4167

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

RICARDO DEL RIO and TONY MEHRDAD SAGHEBIAN

ROBERT G. HULTENG, Bar No. 071293

rhulteng@littler.com 

JOHN C. FISH, Jr., Bar No. 160620

jfish@littler.com

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998

aspurchise@littler.com

ROXANNA IRAN, Bar No. 273625

riran@littler.com

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street, 20th Floor

San Francisco, California 94108.2693

Telephone: 415.433.1940

Facsimile: 415.399.8490

Attorneys for Defendants

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and 

RASIER-CA, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICARDO DEL RIO, an individual 

California resident and TONY MEHRDAD 

SAGHEBIAN, an individual California 

resident, on behalf of themselves and all 

others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation, RASIER-CA, LLC, 

a Delaware Limited Liability Company, 

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING 

MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 

BRIEFING

Complaint Filed: August 11, 2015

FAC Filed: September 21, 2015

Trial Date: None set

Case 3:15-cv-03667-EMC Document 24 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Pursuant to Rule 6-1(b) of the Local Rules of the United States District for the Northern 

District of California, Plaintiffs RICARDO DEL RIO and TONY MEHRDAD SAGHEBIAN

(“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER-CA, LLC 

(“Defendants”) (collectively, “the Parties”), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and 

agree that the deadline for Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration be 

extended from October 28, 2015 to November 11, 2015 and the deadline for Defendants’ Reply 

extended from November 4 to November 23 in order to provide Plaintiffs adequate time to prepare a 

Response to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to provide Defendants with adequate 

time to prepare a Reply in support of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration. 

There has been no previous request to extend the timing for the deadlines associated with 

Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration. This stipulation will not require the alteration of the 

hearing date already set by Court Order. See Dkt. 16.

Dated: October 19, 2015

/s/ Roxanna Iran

ROBERT G. HULTENG

JOHN C. FISH, Jr.

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE

ROXANNA IRAN

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND 

RASIER-CA, LLC

Dated: October 19, 2015

/s/ Amy T. Wootton

CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER

AMY T. WOOTTON

EVELINA SERAFINI

HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RICARDO DEL RIO

*Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from all signatories.

Case 3:15-cv-03667-EMC Document 24 Filed 10/23/15 Page 2 of 3
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

650 California Street

20th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108.2693

415.433.1940

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING 

MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 

BRIEFING TO FILE RESPONSIVE 

PLEADING

2.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: ________________________________ ______________________________________

HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10/23/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-03667-EMC Document 24 Filed 10/23/15 Page 3 of 3