Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05458/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05458-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CORLISS LEE,

Plaintiff,

v.

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 13-cv-05458-VC 

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

The parties are directed to file, no later than 3:00 p.m. on February 4, 2015, supplemental 

briefs, not to exceed 10 pages in length, identifying the specific evidence that the plaintiff 

presented to Metlife in support of the plaintiff's November 1, 2011 request for benefit 

authorization. The briefs should also identify any other evidence that Metlife considered in 

reaching its denial of this request. The briefs should not discuss any evidence that was not before 

Metlife as of its July 16, 2012 denial letter. The briefs should also address the effect, if any, of the 

language in the policy providing that "You will be eligible for Benefits only if . . . We are given 

proof, satisfactory to Us . . ." on the Court's review of the evidence on cross-motions for summary 

judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2015

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-05458-VC Document 51 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 1