Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20451/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20451-20/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Property Damage

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

EMPAK, INC.; EMTRAK, INC.; JENOPTIK AG; 

JENOPTIK INFAB, INC.; and MEISSNER + 

WURST GmbH, 

 Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 98-20451 JF 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED 

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE 

RELIEF TO FILE OVERLENGTH 

REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF 

THEIR MOTION FOR JMOL 

AND/OR NEW TRIAL RE 

OBVIOUSNESS AND THEIR 

MOTION FOR JMOL RE 35 U.S.C. 

§ 271(f) ISSUES AND/OR FOR A 

NEW TRIAL 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. Post-Trial Motion Hearing Date: 

March 29, 2007 

Courtroom: 3

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE OVERLENGTH REPLY BRIEFS

Case No. 98-20451 JF

HOWREY LLP [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

*efiled 3/30/07

-----------------

Case 5:98-cv-20451-JF Document 1093 Filed 03/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Defendants Jenoptik AG, Jenoptik Infab, Inc., and Emtrak, Inc. have filed an unopposed 

Motion for Administrative Relief to file overlength reply briefs in support of their motion for judgment 

as a matter of law or for a new trial regarding obviousness and in support of their motion for judgment 

as a matter of law regarding noninfringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f). 

After considering the requesting papers and all other matters presented to the Court, and 

finding good cause therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. 

Dated: The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

 United States District Judge 

Submitted March 26, 2007 by: 

HOWREY LLP 

By: /s/ Daniel T. Shvodian 

Daniel T. Shvodian 

James F. Valentine 

Floyd R. Nation 

Stephen E. Edwards 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JENOPTIK AG, JENOPTIK INFAB, INC., and 

EMTRAK, INC. 

20343314 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE OVERLENGTH REPLY BRIEFS

Case No. 98-20451 JF

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR -1- HOWREY LLP

3/29/07

Case 5:98-cv-20451-JF Document 1093 Filed 03/30/07 Page 2 of 2