Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-03073/USCOURTS-cand-3_99-cv-03073-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIVERSAL TRADING & INVESTMENT

CO.,

Plaintiff

 v.

PETRO MIKOLAYEVICH KIRITCHENKO, 

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-99-3073 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On June 10, 2005, defendants Bancross U.S. Holdings, Inc, Xanadu Property

Holdings, LLC, and BRC Property Holdings, LLC electronically filed a joinder in the

Kiritchenko defendants’ opposition to plaintiff’s “Motion for Lifting Stay”; on June 16, 2005,

the Lazarenko defendants filed an opposition to plaintiff’s “Motion for Lifting Stay.” Said

parties have violated General Order 45 and the Court’s standing orders, however, by failing

to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day

that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed

electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name,

case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also

Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Case 3:99-cv-03073-MMC Document 824 Filed 06/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

standing orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of the above-referenced

documents. The parties are hereby advised that if any party fails in the future to comply

with the Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the

Court may impose sanctions on the noncomplying party, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2005 

/s/ Maxine M. Chesney 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:99-cv-03073-MMC Document 824 Filed 06/20/05 Page 2 of 2