Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03561-363/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 10-03561 WHA

ORDER IN LIMINE RE GOOGLE’S

MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 RE

IRRELEVANT TESTIMONY INTENDED

TO SUGGEST VIOLATION OF

PRIVACY OR ANTITRUST LAWS 

Google’s motion in limine to preclude Oracle from introducing evidence or argument

intended to suggest that Google is violating the jurors’ privacy rights, privacy laws, and

antitrust laws (Dkt. 1558) is DENIED except as to any references to “cookies,” “monopoly,” or

“monopolization.” Although Google does not dispute that the use was for a commercial use,

the extent of the commercial use is still in play. Evidence regarding Google’s business

practices is relevant to show the extent of commercialism and to meet Google’s point that

Google gives Android away for free.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 2, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1771 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1771 Filed 05/02/16 Page 2 of 2