Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00583/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00583-56/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION

CORPORATION, a Missouri

corporation,

NO. CIV. S-05-583 LKK/GGH

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY

DISTRICT, a municipal utility

district; UTILITY ENGINEERING

CORPORATION, a Texas 

corporation,

Defendants.

 /

The court is in receipt of Fru-Con’s request to modify the

briefing schedule. The court is also in receipt of SMUD’s

request for clarification on whether, if Travelers files a

motion for summary judgment, that motion may only raise issues

unique to Travelers, or if it may address arguments that Fru-Con

has against SMUD, or that SMUD has against Fru-Con.

The court orders as follows:

Case 2:05-cv-00583-LKK -GGH Document 440 Filed 09/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. Motions for summary judgment shall be filed by Friday,

November 16, 2007.

2. Opposition briefs shall be filed by Friday, December 7,

2007.

3. Reply briefs shall be filed by Friday, December 21,

2007.

4. Motions shall be argued on January 28, 2008 at 10:00

a.m.

5. Travelers may file a motion for summary judgment in

accordance with the above briefing schedule, but the court will

look disfavorably upon any effort to circumvent briefing limits. 

To the extent that Travelers addresses arguments that Fru-Con

has against SMUD, or that SMUD has against Fru-Con, this will be

counted against Fru-Con’s 75 page limit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 25, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-00583-LKK -GGH Document 440 Filed 09/25/07 Page 2 of 2