Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05163/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-05163-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:53(b) - Prelim &amp; Perm Inj Relief &amp; other Equitable Relief

---

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO 

RESCHEDULE CMC

4:15-cv-05163-JSW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AROCLES AGUILAR (SBN 94753) 

HARVEY Y. MORRIS (SBN 87902) 

MITCHELL SHAPSON (SBN 127860)

POUNEH GHAFFARIAN (SBN 242779)

JONATHAN C. KOLTZ (SBN 268793)

California Public Utilities Commission

505 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 703-2760

Facsimile: (415) 703-2262

Email: jk5@cpuc.ca.gov

Attorneys for the California Public

Utilities Commission Defendants

See Attachment A for Remaining Parties' 

Names and Addresses

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

A WHITE AND YELLOW CAB, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No.: 4:15-cv-05163-JSW

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 

FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS; 

STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE 

FEBRUARY 12, 2016 CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Honorable Jeffrey S. White

Case 4:15-cv-05163-JSW Document 17 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 5
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO 

RESCHEDULE CMC

4:15-cv-05163-JSW

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Under Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff A White and Yellow Cab, Inc. ("Plaintiff"); 

Defendants California Public Utilities Commission and Defendants Michael Picker, Michel 

Florio, Catherine Sandoval, Carla Peterman, and Liane Randolph, in their official capacities as 

Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC Defendants"); and 

Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC ("Uber Defendants"), 

by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff served its summons and complaint on the CPUC Defendants on January 

7, 2016. Ordinarily, the CPUC Defendants' responsive pleading would be due on January 28,

2016, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(A) and 12(a)(1)(A)(i). 

2. On January 7, 2016, the Uber Defendants waived service of Plaintiff's complaint. 

Their responsive pleading is due on March 7, 2016, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(3).

3. Both the CPUC Defendants and the Uber Defendants anticipate filing motions to 

dismiss the complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b). The CPUC Defendants and the Uber 

Defendants believe it would serve the interests of judicial economy to have the Defendants' 

motions heard by the Court at the same time.

4. The CPUC Defendants have requested an additional period of time of an extra 

thirty-eight days beyond the twenty-one days allowed them under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(A) and 

12(a)(1)(A)(i) within which to file their motion. Plaintiff’s counsel has requested a 

corresponding additional thirty-eight day extension of time in addition to the fourteen days 

allowed Plaintiff’s counsel under Local Rule 7-3(a) within which to file an Opposition to the 

Defendants’ Motions. All parties agree to these corresponding extensions. Further, Plaintiff’s 

counsel has requested that no hearings be set for the week of April 15-22 since she will be out 

of the office that week on a personal business matter, and counsel for the Uber Defendants have 

requested that no hearings be set between the dates of May 9-20, 2016 because of counsel’s trial 

schedule. The parties agree to accommodate each others’ schedules. 

Case 4:15-cv-05163-JSW Document 17 Filed 02/02/16 Page 2 of 5
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO 

RESCHEDULE CMC

4:15-cv-05163-JSW

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5. The parties therefore stipulate, and request that the Court order, that the CPUC 

Defendants' motion to dismiss and/or other responsive pleading will be due on March 7, 2016, 

60 days after service, and 38 days after those pleadings ordinarily would have been due. 

6. The parties further stipulate, and request that the Court order, that Plaintiff's 

opposition to the Defendants' motions will be due 52 days after the Defendants file and serve 

their motions (i.e., as to the CPUC Defendants, 38 days after the opposition ordinarily would 

have been due under Civil Local Rule 7-3(a)).

7. The parties further stipulate, and request that the Court order, that Defendants' 

replies to Plaintiff's oppositions will be due 14 days after Plaintiff files and serves its opposition 

(i.e., 7 days after the replies ordinarily would have been due under Civil Local Rule 7-3(c)). 

8. The Initial Case Management Conference in this case is currently scheduled for 

February 12, 2016. The Uber Defendants and the CPUC Defendants believe that their 

anticipated motions to dismiss may obviate the need for any Case Management Conference 

until those motions are heard and ruled on. The parties therefore request that the Initial Case 

Management Conference, currently scheduled for February 12, 2016, be vacated and 

rescheduled. 

9. The parties understand that the Court schedules both Civil Law and Motion and 

Case Management Conferences on Friday mornings. If possible, the parties request that both a 

hearing on the Defendants' motions to dismiss and the Initial Case Management Conference, if 

necessary, be scheduled for the same day. 

10. The parties therefore request that the Court conduct a hearing on the Defendants' 

motions to dismiss, followed by an Initial Case Management Conference, if necessary, on June 

3, 2016, or as soon thereafter as the parties may be heard. 

///

///

///

Case 4:15-cv-05163-JSW Document 17 Filed 02/02/16 Page 3 of 5
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO 

RESCHEDULE CMC

4:15-cv-05163-JSW

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 28, 2016

/s/ Jonathan C. Koltz /s/ Maryann Cazzell

By: ___________________________ By: ___________________________

JONATHAN C. KOLTZ MARYANN CAZZELL

 

Attorney for the CPUC Defendants Attorney for the Plaintiff

/s/ Marshall Wallace

By: ___________________________

MARSHALL WALLACE

 

Attorney for the Uber Defendants

CERTIFICATION

I, Jonathan C. Koltz, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file this Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings. In compliance with 

Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this 

document from each of the other signatories.

Dated: January 28, 2016 /s/ Jonathan C. Koltz

Case 4:15-cv-05163-JSW Document 17 Filed 02/02/16 Page 4 of 5
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND TO 

RESCHEDULE CMC

4:15-cv-05163-JSW

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. No later than March 7, 2016, the CPUC Defendants shall file and serve their 

motion to dismiss or other responsive pleading.

2. No later than 52 days after the Defendants file and serve their responsive 

pleadings, Plaintiff shall file and serve oppositions to those responsive pleadings, if any.

3. No later than 14 days after Plaintiff files and serves oppositions to those 

responsive pleadings, the Defendants shall file and serve their replies, if any. 

4. The Initial Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for February 12, 

2016, is vacated.

5. The hearing of Defendants' anticipated motions shall take place on __________, 

2016, at 9:00 a.m.

6. The Court will conduct the Initial Case Management Conference on the same 

Friday as the anticipated motions to dismiss are to be heard, at 11:00 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

The Honorable Jeffrey S. White

United States District Judge

June 3

Dated: February 2, 2016

Case 4:15-cv-05163-JSW Document 17 Filed 02/02/16 Page 5 of 5