Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01305/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01305-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD WILSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

D. SMITH, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-cv-01305-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 5)

ORDER GRANTING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER THAT RESPONDENT

CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATENESS

OF TRANSFERRING PETITIONER

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On October 23, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

GRANTED, and Respondent be ORDERED to consider the appropriateness

of transferring Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set

forth in § 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed

appropriate by the BOP, without reference to the BOP policy

promulgated in December 2002 and without reference to the BOP's

February 14, 2005, amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. These Findings

and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice

Case 1:06-cv-01305-OWW -DLB Document 8 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 On November 9, 2006, Respondent filed a motion for an extension of time to file the answer. 1

Good cause having been demonstrated, Respondent's request is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. 

2

that any objections were to be filed within ten (10) days from the

date of service of that order. on November 8, 2006, Respondent

filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis. Respondent's objections present

no grounds for questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 23, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED; and,

3. Respondent consider the appropriateness of transferring

Petitioner to an RRC in light of the factors set forth in

§ 3621(b), not excluding any other factors deemed appropriate by

the BOP, without reference to the BOP policy promulgated in

December 2002 and without reference to the BOP's February 14, 2005,

amendment to 28 C.F.R. § 570.21. Given that Petitioner's projected

release date is March 25, 2009, with a current projected release

date of September 25, 2008, to a Residential Re-entry Center,

Respondent is ordered to make this determination within six (6)

months from the date of this Order.IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 18, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01305-OWW -DLB Document 8 Filed 01/19/07 Page 2 of 2