Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00646/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00646-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Salman and Suzanne Salman, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

City of Phoenix, et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-11-646-PHX-FJM

ORDER

We have before us plaintiffs’ amended motion for a temporary restraining order (doc.

7) and amended memorandum in support (doc. 8). We denied plaintiffs’ first motion for a

restraining order because they failed to satisfy any of the conditions for the granting of

injunctive relief. See Order of April 8, 2011 (doc. 5). Plaintiffs make no additional

allegations that support their renewed application. The amended motion only deals with the

page limit issue we raised. It fails to address the substantive reasons for our denial of relief.

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiffs’ amended motion for a temporary

restraining order (doc.7). 

We again urge plaintiffs to seek the advice of a lawyer. 

DATED this 21st day of April, 2011.

Case 2:11-cv-00646-FJM Document 10 Filed 04/22/11 Page 1 of 1