Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20451/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20451-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Property Damage

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ASYST’S 

UNOPPOSED MTN FOR ADMIN. RELIEF TO FILE 

OVERLENGTH BRIEF 

CASE NO. C-98-20451 JF (EAI)

DARRYL M. WOO (CSB No. 100513) 

E-Mail: dwoo@fenwick.com

MICHAEL J. SACKSTEDER (CSB No.191605) 

E-Mail: msacksteder@fenwick.com

DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB No. 223936) 

E-Mail: dschumann@fenwick.com

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EMPAK, INC.; EMTRAK, INC.; 

JENOPTIK AG; JENOPTIK INFAB, 

INC.; and MEISSNER + WURST GmbH, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C-98-20451 JF (EAI) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ASYST 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S UNOPPOSED 

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE 

RELIEF TO FILE AN OVERLENGTH 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR JMOL OR NEW TRIAL RE 

OBVIOUSNESS 

Date: March 29, 2007 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 3, Fifth Floor 

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel

*efiled 3/30/07

-----------------

Case 5:98-cv-20451-JF Document 1092 Filed 03/30/07 Page 1 of 2
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ASYST’S 

UNOPPOSED MTN FOR ADMIN. RELIEF TO FILE 

OVERLENGTH BRIEF 

1 CASE NO. C-98-20451 JF (EAI) 

Plaintiff Asyst Technologies, Inc. has filed an unopposed Motion for Administrative 

Relief to file an overlength opposition to Defendants Jenoptik AG, Jenoptik Infab, Inc., and 

Emtrak, Inc.’s motion for JMOL or a new trial regarding obviousness. 

After considering the requesting papers and all other matters presented to the Court, and 

finding good cause therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. 

Dated: __________________________ ______________________________________ 

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

United States District Judge 

Submitted March 21, 2007 by: 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/Darryl M. Woo 

Darryl M. Woo 

Michael J. Sacksteder 

David D. Schumann 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

3/29/07

Case 5:98-cv-20451-JF Document 1092 Filed 03/30/07 Page 2 of 2