Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_08-cv-00009/USCOURTS-azd-4_08-cv-00009-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Armando Valles, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Pima County, et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CV-08-09-TUC-FRZ (JCG)

REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

On June 9, 2008, the Magistrate issued a Report & Recommendation recommending

that the District Court grant a Motion to Dismiss and a Motion for Sanctions filed by

Defendants West Speedway Partners (“West”) and the Villas at Hacienda del Sol (“the

Villas”). (Doc. No. 90.) On June 10, 2008, the Magistrate Judge ordered West and the

Villas to file their request for attorneys’ fees in compliance with LRCiv 54.2. (Doc. No. 93.)

Following the Court’s Report & Recommendation and Order, West and the Villas met

and conferred with Plaintiffs regarding their attorneys’ fees as required by Rule 54.2. The

parties agreed that West and the Villas were entitled to $5,482.00 in attorneys’ fees and

$215.00 in costs pursuant to the sanctions awarded by the Court. On June 24, 2008, the

parties filed a stipulation setting forth the terms of their agreement. (Doc. No. 99.) 

RECOMMENDATION

The Magistrate’s Report & Recommendation filed on June 9, 2008 (Doc. No. 90)

recommending award of attorneys’ fees is pending before the District Court. The Magistrate

recommends that the District Court, after its independent review of the record, enter an order

awarding to West and the Villas the attorneys’ fees and costs stipulated to by the parties on

June 24, 2008. (Doc. No. 99.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), any party may serve and file

written objections within 10 days of being served with a copy of this Report and

Case 4:08-cv-00009-FRZ-JCG Document 101 Filed 06/25/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived. If

objections are filed, the parties should use the following case number: CV-08-09-TUC-FRZ.

DATED this 25th day of June, 2008.

Case 4:08-cv-00009-FRZ-JCG Document 101 Filed 06/25/08 Page 2 of 2