Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01442/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-01442-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Leonel Cano-Mendoza, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

United States of America, 

Respondent.

No. CV-13-01442-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

 Petitioner filed his Petition for Error Coram Nobis on July 15, 2013 arguing that 

the Court should find fundamental error occurred in his 1995 criminal matter, in which he 

pled guilty to entering the United States without inspection. Respondent filed its Response 

to Petitioner’s Petition for Error Coram Nobis on November 5, 2013. No reply was filed. 

On March 26, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and Recommendation 

recommending that the petition be denied. 

 In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation 

within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such 

objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been 

filed. 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. 

Case 2:13-cv-01442-SRB Document 9 Filed 04/18/14 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the order of this Court. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis

Habeas Corpus is denied. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

 Dated this 18th day of April, 2014. 

 

Case 2:13-cv-01442-SRB Document 9 Filed 04/18/14 Page 2 of 2