Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01086/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-01086-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE UTLEY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

C.O. ACEVEDO, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 1:15-cv-01086-LJO-SAB

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO REFILE 

REQUEST AND SERVE NOTICE OF 

MOTION 

(ECF No. 73)

On December 14, 2016, Plaintiff filed a document as a first amended status report. The 

document is actually a request for a continuance of the trial in this action. Plaintiff is directed to 

refile his document selecting the correct event in the ECF system. 

Plaintiff is directed to Local Rule 230 for the notice requirements regarding a contested 

motion. Pursuant to Rule 230(b), 

Except as otherwise provided in these Rules or as ordered or allowed by the Court, all 

motions shall be noticed on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge or Magistrate 

Judge. The moving party shall file a notice of motion, motion, accompanying briefs, 

affidavits, if appropriate, and copies of all documentary evidence that the moving party 

intends to submit in support of the motion. The matter shall be set for hearing on the 

motion calendar of the Judge or Magistrate Judge to whom the action has been assigned 

or before whom the motion is to be heard not less than twenty-eight (28) days after 

service and filing of the motion.

The Rule provides that if the motion is not properly noticed, “the moving party shall file and 

serve a new notice of motion setting forth a proper time and date.” L.R. 230(b).

Case 1:15-cv-01086-DAD-SAB Document 74 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to refile his request for a modification of the 

scheduling order and serve a notice of motion setting forth a proper date and time for a hearing on the 

request.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 15, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-01086-DAD-SAB Document 74 Filed 12/16/16 Page 2 of 2