Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01924/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01924-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

---

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON/

CASE NO. 15-CV-1924-HSG

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Kathleen Cahill Slaught (SBN 168129) 

kslaught@seyfarth.com 

Michelle M. Scannell (SBN 267767) 

mscannell@seyfarth.com 

560 Mission Street, 31st Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

Attorneys for Defendants 

KAISER PERMANENTE ADMINISTRATIVE 

COMMITTEE and KAISER PERMANENTE 

RETIREMENT PLAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PATRICIA H. MINTZ, an individual,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, 

INC., in its capacity as Plan Administrator and 

fiduciary of the Kaiser Permanente Salaried 

Retirement Plan, and KAISER 

PERMANENTE SALARIED RETIREMENT 

PLAN, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 15-CV-1924-HSG

STIPULATED REQUEST TO 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON

Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-12, and 16-2(e), Plaintiff 

Patricia H. Mintz (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Kaiser Permanente Administrative Committee, 

erroneously sued as “Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Incorporated” and Kaiser Permanente 

Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), erroneously sued as “Kaiser Permanente Salaried Retirement Plan” 

(collectively referred to herein as “Defendants”) by and through their counsel, stipulate and agree 

as follows: 

// 

Case 4:15-cv-01924-HSG Document 14 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 3
 2

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON/

CASE NO. 15-CV-1924-HSG

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order, the initial Case Management 

Conference (“CMC”) in this matter is currently scheduled for August 4, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.; 

WHEREAS, when the CMC was scheduled, lead trial counsel for Defendants had already 

purchased plane tickets for a vacation and will be out of state on August 4, 2015 and therefore 

unavailable to attend the CMC as currently scheduled by the Court; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel does not object to a proposed continuance of the CMC; 

WHEREAS, lead trial counsel for the Parties are available to attend a CMC on August 

11, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.; 

WHEREAS, counsel for both Plaintiff and Defendants would like to inform the Court 

that they are also unavailable the week of August 17th due to vacations with travel arrangements 

already purchased; and 

WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated to extend the deadline for Defendants to 

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that the Court continue the initial 

CMC to August 11, 2015 or thereafter, pursuant to the Court’s and counsel’s availability. The 

Parties agree that this extension will not alter the date of any other event or any other deadline 

already fixed by Court Order or by this Stipulation, including the CMC Statement due date of 

July 28, 2015. 

DATED: June 5 , 2015 Respectfully submitted, 

CREITZ & SEREBIN LLP 

By: __/s/ Joseph A. Creitz ______________ Joseph A. Creitz 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PATRICIA H. MINTZ 

Case 4:15-cv-01924-HSG Document 14 Filed 06/08/15 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

D

d

C

D

STIPU

DATED: Jun

Pursu

ocument has

PURS

Conference is

Dated: _____

ULATED RE

e 5, 2015 

ant to Civil L

s been obtain

SUANT TO

s continued t

___________

QUEST TO C

CA

Local Rule 5

ned from eac

O STIPULAT

to August 11

__________

3

CONTINUE 

ASE NO. 15-C

ATTEST

5-1(i)(3), I a

ch of the oth

___

Ka

TION, IT IS

1, 2015. 

___ ___

Un

CMC; [PROP

CV-1924-HSG

SEYFART

By: /s/ K

Kathle

Michel

Attorneys f

KAISER P

ADMINIST

KAISER P

PLAN 

TATION 

attest that con

her signatorie

_/s/ Kathleen

athleen Cahil

S SO ORDE

__________

nited States D

POSED] ORD

G

TH SHAW L

Kathleen Cah

een Cahill Sl

lle M. Scann

for Defendan

PERMANEN

TRATIVE C

PERMANEN

ncurrence in

es. 

n Cahill Slau

ll Slaught 

ERED that t

___________

District Judg

DER THERE

LLP 

hill Slaught

laught 

nell 

nts 

NTE 

COMMITTE

NTE RETIRE

n the filing o

ught______

the Case Ma

__________

ge Haywood 

EON/

EE and 

EMENT 

of this 

anagement 

______ 

Gilliam, Jr.

Case 4:15-cv-01924-HSG Document 14 Filed 06/08/15 Page 3 of 3