Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06699/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06699-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION & [] ORDER 

CONTINUING FURTHER CMC 

 CASE NO. C-06-06699-RMW 

SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB No. 126930) 

KEVIN P. MUCK (CSB No. 120918) 

KALAMA M. LUI-KWAN (CSB No. 242121) 

GAURAV MATHUR (CSB No. 242630) 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

smuck@fenwick.com 

kmuck@fenwick.com 

klui-kwan@fenwick.com 

gmathur@fenwick.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re MIPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

DERIVATIVE LITIGATION 

___________________________________ 

This Document Relates To: 

All Actions 

Master File No. C-06-06699-RMW 

STIPULATION AND [] 

ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET 

FOR OCTOBER 12, 2007 

*E-FILED - 10/4/07*

Case 5:06-cv-06699-RMW Document 32 Filed 10/04/07 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION & [] ORDER 

CONTINUING FURTHER CMC 

- 1 - CASE NO. C-06-06699-RMW 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the stipulation and order entered by the Court on May 22, 2007, a 

further case management conference in the above-captioned action is currently set for October 12, 

2007; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the order entered by the Court on April 12, 2007, various related 

cases were consolidated into this action, lead plaintiff and lead counsel were appointed, and a 

briefing schedule was set for a motion to dismiss by MIPS Technologies, Inc. (“MIPS”) on the 

grounds that plaintiff lacks standing to sue on behalf of MIPS; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint in this action on August 30, 2007; 

WHEREAS, MIPS’ motion to dismiss is due no later than October 15, 2007, Plaintiff’s 

opposition to the motion is due no later than November 29, 2007, and MIPS’ reply in support of 

its motion is due no later than December 20, 2007; 

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have conferred and agreed to a hearing date of 

January 11, 2008 for MIPS’ motion to dismiss; and 

WHEREAS, the parties believe that the resources of the Court and the parties are best 

conserved, and the interests of judicial economy are best served, by continuing the case 

management conference to the same date that MIPS’ motion to dismiss shall be heard; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Northern District of 

California Civil Local Rule 6-1, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, as 

follows: 

1. The Case Management Conference in this action, currently set for October 12, 

2007, shall be taken off of calendar and rescheduled for January 11, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED, pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local 

Rule 6-1, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, that the parties may enter into 

and submit a further appropriate stipulation amending this filing. 

Case 5:06-cv-06699-RMW Document 32 Filed 10/04/07 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION & [] ORDER 

CONTINUING FURTHER CMC 

- 2 - CASE NO. C-06-06699-RMW 

Dated: September 27, 2007 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Kevin P. Muck 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: September 27, 2007 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & 

ROBBINS LLP 

By: /s/ 

 John K. Grant 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest 

under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from 

John K. Grant. 

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

22622/00403/LIT/1273653.1 

10/4/07

Case 5:06-cv-06699-RMW Document 32 Filed 10/04/07 Page 3 of 3