Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-05105/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-05105-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLUOR CORPORATION,

Defendant.

THE SHILOH GROUP,

Intervenor/Plaintiff,

v.

FLUOR CORPORATION,

Defendant.

FLUOR CORPORATION,

Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

SHILOH ROAD, WEST COAST METALS, 

INC., M&M SERVICES, INC.

Third-Party Defendants.

Case No. 10-cv-05105-WHO 

FURTHER ORDER REGARDING 

PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 194, 208

Plaintiff California River Watch and defendant Fluor Corporation presented a revised 

Proposed Consent Judgment (Dkt. No.212-1) for review at the Case Management Conference this 

afternoon. The revised Proposed Consent Judgment addresses the concerns I raised in the Order 

Regarding Consent Judgment (Dkt. No. 208) and I will enter it once River Watch and Fluor 

Case 3:10-cv-05105-WHO Document 214 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

execute it. In this regard, the parties brought to my attention a typo that created an ambiguity on 

page 3, line 14 of the Order Regarding Consent Judgment. The first “or” in that line should be 

deleted, so that the sentence reads: “As currently drafted, the proposed judgment may preclude the 

general public from bringing a RCRA or CWA suit in the future (i) based on facts not presently 

known or (ii) if conditions at the Site change.” I thank the parties for their diligence in raising that 

issue, and appreciate the manner in which River Watch and Fluor addressed my concerns about 

the Consent Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2015

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-05105-WHO Document 214 Filed 02/03/15 Page 2 of 2