Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01226/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01226-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT 

United States Attorney 

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL 

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

Social Security Administration 

CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

160 Spear Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 977-8956 

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 

 E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

NANETTE MARGUERITE PUCKETT, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ANDREW SAUL, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01226-AC 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 15 

DAYS FOR DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 15 additional days to respond 

to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The current due date is February 24, 2020. The new 

due date will be March 10, 2020. 

This is Defendant’s first request for an extension of time for briefing and the third request 

for an extension of time in this case overall. There is good cause for this request and not intended 

to delay. Defendant requires additional time to review the record in this case to properly evaluate 

the issues raised in Plaintiff’s opening motion, to consider settlement options, and if not settling, 

to prepare Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Since the filing of 

Case 2:19-cv-01226-AC Document 15 Filed 02/24/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, Defendant’s counsel has diligently worked on various 

district court cases and other substantive non-court matters. Counsel also has at least five 

substantive court and non-court matters scheduled between February 24, 2020, to March 10, 2020. 

Thus, Defendant is respectfully requesting additional time up to and including March 10, 

2020, to respond to Plaintiff’s opening motion for summary judgment. Defendant apologizes for 

the further delay and any inconvenience caused by the delay. 

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified 

accordingly. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Date: February 20, 2020 FORSLUD LAW LLC 

 s/ Jacqueline A. Forslund by C.Chen* 

 (As authorized by email on 2/20/2020) 

 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Date: February 20, 2020 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT 

 United States Attorney 

 

 By s/ Carolyn B. Chen 

 CAROLYN B. CHEN 

 Special Assistant U. S. Attorney 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 ORDER 

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 

DATED: February 21, 2020 

Case 2:19-cv-01226-AC Document 15 Filed 02/24/20 Page 2 of 2