Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01612/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01612-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2004\1612\orderreextension.wpd

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FINAU TAPUELUELU ESTATE et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SAN FRANCISCO CITY & COUNTY et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 04-01612 CRB

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF

TIME

Now before the Court is plaintiffs’ counsel’s request for an extension of time to file an

opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. After carefully considering the

request, defendants’ response, and the history of this case, the Court GRANTS plaintiffs’

request. 

The Court orders that plaintiffs submit their opposition no later than October 21,

2005. Failure to do so will be considered a non-opposition to the motion. Defendants’ reply

shall be filed no later than October 28, 2005. If defendants need an extension of time in

order to file the reply because of a conflicting trial, counsel shall notify the Court. The

hearing on this motion is rescheduled for November 4, 2005 at 10:00 am. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 12, 2005

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-01612-CRB Document 87 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2004\1612\orderreextension.wpd 2

Case 3:04-cv-01612-CRB Document 87 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2