Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01351/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01351-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW LUCAS FRAZIER,

Plaintiff, No. 2:11-cv-1351 AC P

vs.

REDDING POLICE DEPT., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

 Plaintiff is a prison inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil

rights action.1

 On June 21, 2013, plaintiff filed a document entitled “motion for a TRO

preliminary injunctive relief.” ECF No. 107. In this document as in previous filings, plaintiff

insists that he is being denied access to certain G.P.S. records. He asks that the court issue an

order directing “the state parole” to provide plaintiff such records for September 26, 2010. Id. 

Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on February 22, 2013. ECF No.

96. Plaintiff’s opposition was filed on March 20, 2013, and includes a request to continue the

motion because there is still a need for discovery. ECF Nos. 97-100. Defendants filed their

reply on March 28, 2013. ECF No. 102.

1

 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge in this case. 

Case 2:11-cv-01351-AC Document 108 Filed 06/25/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

On March 29, 2013, this court gave plaintiff an additional 60 days to supplement

his opposition with additional evidentiary submissions because defendants had failed to provide

plaintiff the requisite contemporaneous Rand notice with their dispositive motion. ECF No. 105. 

Plaintiff supplemented his opposition in a filing dated April 19, 2013. ECF No. 106. 

The instant motion is both untimely and redundant. The court will consider

plaintiff’s oft-repeated concerns in its review of the pending summary judgment motion. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s improper request for a

TRO/preliminary injunctive relief (ECF No. 107) is hereby disregarded.

DATED: June 24, 2013

 

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AC:009

fraz1351.ord

Case 2:11-cv-01351-AC Document 108 Filed 06/25/13 Page 2 of 2