Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-01968/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-01968-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 350
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGER DRIVER,

Plaintiff,

v.

PAPE TRUCKS, INC.,

Defendant.

No. 2:17-CV-01968-KJN

ORDER &

PROPOSED PRETRIAL 

SCHEDULING ORDER

PAPE TRUCKS, INC., 

Third Party Plaintiff, 

v. 

JOMAR INVESTMENTS, INC. et. al.,

Third Party Defendants. 

THE FOLLOWING IS A PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PARTIES. 

THE COURT INTENDS TO ENTER AN ORDER SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO THIS 

PROPOSED ORDER. BUT IN LIGHT OF THE STATUS CONFERENCE THE COURT 

SCHEDULES BELOW, IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL FOR ALL PARTIES TO KNOW 

WHAT TIMELINES AND REQUIREMENTS THE COURT INTENDS TO ORDER. 

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 46 Filed 01/27/20 Page 1 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On October 10, 2019, the court conducted a status (pretrial scheduling) conference and 

hearing on third party defendant Jomar Investment, Inc.’s (Jomar) motion to dismiss in this 

matter.1 (ECF No. 40.) The court granted Jomar’s motion to dismiss, but gave Pape Trunks, Inc.

(Pape) leave to amend its third-party complaint. (ECF No. 40.) The court subsequently ordered 

the parties to file an amended joint status report, which they have done. (ECF Nos. 44, 45.) After 

considering the parties’ amended joint status report and the parties’ representations at the status 

conference, the court issues the following pretrial scheduling order.2 

NATURE OF THE CASE

Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action related to an incident that occurred on 

June 1, 2016. Plaintiff is a truck driver for Apache Logistics. He was delivering cargo to 

defendant Pape’s facility in French Camp, California. Plaintiff claims that he suffered fractures 

to his leg, ankle, and foot when a piece of cargo in his trailer fell on him. Plaintiff asserts that 

defendant caused the accident.

Defendant contends that the incident occurred as a result of plaintiff’s own negligence and 

the negligence of third party defendant Jomar for loading the trailer in an unsafe manner. Third 

party defendant denies that it has unsafe loading practices and that it is liable for plaintiff’s 

injuries. Instead, third party defendant contends the incident occurred as a result of other parties 

to this case and/or third parties.

SERVICE OF PROCESS

Defendant, Pape, has been served and filed an answer to complaint. (ECF No. 9.) All 

other defendants, previously named, have been dismissed. (ECF No. 8.) Third party defendant 

Jomar has been served and answered. (ECF Nos. 31, 43.)

JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS

The workers compensation insurance carrier that has provided workers compensation 

 

1 After all parties consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all 

purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the action was reassigned to the undersigned for all 

further proceedings and entry of final judgment. (ECF Nos. 4, 11, 12, 41.) 

2 The court has made minor modifications to the parties’ proposed scheduling deadlines based on 

the court’s own availability and case management needs.

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 46 Filed 01/27/20 Page 2 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

benefits to plaintiff may intervene in this action. 

Third party defendant may seek to add additional parties. Specifically, it may seek 

indemnification from other parties that may have moved or shifted the cargo along plaintiff’s 

route on the day in question. 

Defendant Pape requests leave to file a First Amended Answer to the Complaint. 

Defendant’s request is GRANTED. Defendant shall have 14 days from the date of this order to 

file an amended answer. 

JURISDICTION/VENUE

Jurisdiction and venue are undisputed and are hereby found to be proper. 

INITIAL DISCLOSURES

The parties have exchanged initial disclosures. 

LAW AND MOTION

All law and motion, except as to discovery-related matters, shall be completed by 

January 6, 2021. The word “completed” in this context means that all law and motion matters 

must be heard by the above date. Counsel and/or parties proceeding without counsel3are 

cautioned to refer to the Local Rules regarding the requirements for noticing such motions on the 

court’s regularly scheduled law and motion calendar, including, but not limited to, Local Rule 

230. Judge Newman generally hears civil motions on Thursdays at 10:00 a.m. This paragraph 

does not preclude motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other emergency 

applications, for which the court may set a special briefing schedule, if necessary or appropriate. 

The parties should keep in mind that the purpose of law and motion is to narrow and 

refine the legal issues raised by the case and to dispose of by pretrial motion those issues that are 

susceptible to resolution without trial. To accomplish that purpose, the parties need to identify 

and fully research the issues presented by the case, and then examine those issues in light of the 

evidence obtained through discovery. If it appears to counsel after examining the legal issues and 

facts that an issue can be resolved by pretrial motion, counsel are to file the appropriate motion 

 

3 Any reference to “counsel” in this order includes parties appearing without counsel, otherwise 

referred to as appearing in propria persona or pro se.

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 46 Filed 01/27/20 Page 3 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

consistent with the law and motion cutoff set forth above.

ALL PURELY LEGAL ISSUES ARE TO BE RESOLVED BY TIMELY PRETRIAL 

MOTION. Counsel are reminded that motions in limine are procedural devices designed to 

address the admissibility of evidence. COUNSEL ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE COURT 

WILL LOOK WITH DISFAVOR UPON SUBSTANTIVE MOTIONS PRESENTED UNDER 

THE GUISE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE AT THE TIME OF TRIAL. 

DISCOVERY

All discovery shall be completed by December 11, 2020. The word “completed” means 

that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any 

disputes related to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, 

where discovery has been ordered, the order has been complied with. Discovery motions must be 

noticed on the undersigned’s law and motion calendar in accordance with the Local Rules and 

must be heard not later than November 27, 2020. Judge Newman generally hears civil motions 

on Thursdays at 10:00 a.m. 

The parties are reminded that discovery-related motions must conform to the requirements 

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this court’s Local Rules, including Local Rule 251. 

Additionally, the parties are required to meet and confer in good faith in an attempt to resolve 

their discovery disputes informally and without court intervention prior to filing a discovery 

motion. Such meet and confer shall take place in person, or at a minimum, via a telephonic 

conference. The mere exchange of letters or e-mails alone is not sufficient. As part of their joint 

statement related to a discovery motion submitted pursuant to Local Rule 251, the parties shall 

also specifically outline: (a) what meet-and-confer efforts were undertaken; (b) when and where 

such discussions took place; (c) who was present; and (d) how the parties’ disputes were 

narrowed as a result of such discussions. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in 

summary denial of a discovery motion. 

Additionally, the court strongly encourages the use of informal telephonic discovery 

conferences with the court in lieu of formal discovery motion practice. The procedures and 

conditions for requesting and conducting such an informal telephonic discovery conference are 

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 46 Filed 01/27/20 Page 4 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

outlined in Judge Newman’s “Order re Informal Telephonic Conferences re Discovery Disputes,” 

posted on the court’s website at http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/judges/alljudges/5046/. Furthermore, subject to the court’s availability, the court will also rule on disputes 

encountered at oral depositions, so as to avoid such depositions from breaking down. In the 

course of the deposition, the parties may contact Judge Newman’s courtroom deputy clerk at 

(916) 930-4187 to inquire regarding Judge Newman’s availability. However, the parties are 

cautioned that these informal procedures are not to be abused, and the court may impose 

appropriate sanctions on an offending party or parties, even in the course of informal discovery 

conferences.

EXPERT DISCLOSURES

The parties shall disclose any expert witnesses in accordance with the specifications of 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) no later than October 5, 2020. Any rebuttal expert 

disclosures shall be made in accordance with the specifications of Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 26(a)(2) no later than November 4, 2020. Expert disclosures shall be filed with the 

court and served upon all other parties.

An expert witness not timely disclosed will not be permitted to testify unless the party 

offering the witness demonstrates that: (a) the necessity of the witness could not have been 

reasonably anticipated at the time that the expert disclosures were due; (b) the court and opposing 

counsel were promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) the witness was promptly 

proffered for deposition. Failure to provide the information required by Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 26(a)(2) along with the expert disclosures may lead to preclusion of the expert’s 

testimony or other appropriate sanctions.

FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

The final pretrial conference is set before the undersigned on January 26, 2021, at 10:00 

a.m., in Courtroom No. 25. Counsel are cautioned that counsel appearing at the pretrial 

conference will in fact try the matter. Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at 

the time of the pretrial conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except 

production of witnesses for oral testimony. Counsel are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 46 Filed 01/27/20 Page 5 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

relating to pretrial statements and conferences. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL 

RULES 281 AND 282 WILL BE GROUNDS FOR SANCTIONS. 

Notwithstanding Local Rule 281, the parties shall submit a joint pretrial statement no 

later than January 12, 2021. The joint pretrial statement shall conform with the requirements of 

Local Rule 281(b). The undisputed facts and disputed factual issues shall be set forth in two 

separate sections. The parties should identify those facts which are relevant to each separate 

cause of action. In this regard, the parties are to number each individual fact or factual issue. 

Where the parties are unable to agree as to what factual issues are properly before the court for 

trial, they should nevertheless list in the section on “DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUES” all issues 

asserted by any of the parties and explain by parenthetical the controversy concerning each issue. 

The parties should keep in mind that, in general, each fact should relate or correspond to an 

element of the relevant cause of action. The parties should also keep in mind that the purpose of 

listing the disputed factual issues is to apprise the court and all parties about the precise issues 

that will be litigated at trial. The court is not interested in a listing of all evidentiary facts 

underlying the issues that are in dispute. However, with respect to the listing of undisputed facts, 

the court will accept agreements as to evidentiary facts. The joint statement of undisputed facts 

and disputed factual issues is to be filed with the court concurrently with the filing of the joint 

pretrial statement. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b), the parties are required to provide with their pretrial 

statement a list of witnesses and exhibits that they propose to proffer at trial, no matter for what 

purpose. These lists shall not be contained in the pretrial statement itself, but shall be attached as 

separate documents to be used as addenda to the final pretrial order. Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be 

listed numerically; defendant’s exhibits shall be listed alphabetically. The pretrial order will 

contain a stringent standard for the proffering of witnesses and exhibits at trial not listed in the 

pretrial order. Counsel are cautioned that the standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, 

the listing of exhibits or witnesses which counsel do not intend to use will be viewed as an abuse 

of the court’s processes. 

Counsel are reminded that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, it will be their 

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 46 Filed 01/27/20 Page 6 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7

duty at the pretrial conference to aid the court in: (a) formulation and simplification of issues and 

the elimination of meritless claims or defenses; (b) settling of facts that should be properly 

admitted; and (c) avoidance of unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence. The parties must 

prepare their joint pretrial statement and participate in good faith at the pretrial conference with 

these aims in mind. A FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF 

SANCTIONS, which may include monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of 

claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as the court deems appropriate.

TRIAL SETTING

A jury trial shall commence before the undersigned on February 16, 2021, at 9:00 a.m.,

in Courtroom No. 25. The first day of trial will be limited to addressing motions in limine, jury 

instructions, and other preliminary trial matters. Jury selection will commence on Wednesday, 

February 17, 2021. The court presently anticipates that the trial will take approximately six (6) 

days, not including the first day of trial dedicated to preliminary matters.

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

A settlement conference may be scheduled by the court at the final pretrial conference. 

Nevertheless, if the parties at any point determine that an earlier settlement conference would be 

beneficial, they shall file a stipulation and proposed order for the court’s consideration. 

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

The parties are reminded that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4), this 

order shall not be modified except by leave of court upon a showing of “good cause.” See

Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992). Mere agreement by the 

parties pursuant to a stipulation does not constitute good cause. Nor does the unavailability of 

witnesses or counsel, except in extraordinary circumstances, constitute good cause.

FURTHER HEARING 

In light of this Proposed Order, and at the request of the parties, a telephonic status 

conference hearing is set for February 13, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. The parties are instructed to 

call 5 minutes prior to the hearing into the conference line 1-888-363-4734 and use the access 

code 1245690 plus # and the security code 4223 plus # when prompted. At the conference, the 

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 46 Filed 01/27/20 Page 7 of 8
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

8

parties are to address any objections to the Proposed Order. Following the conference, the court 

will issue its final pretrial scheduling order. 

ACCORDINGLY, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Defendant’s request to file an amended answer is GRANTED. Defendant shall have 

14 days from the date of this order to file an amended answer; and

2. This matter is scheduled for a telephonic conference for February 13, 2020, at 10:00 

a.m.

Dated: January 27, 2020

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/1968.pape

Case 2:17-cv-01968-CSK Document 46 Filed 01/27/20 Page 8 of 8