Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02340/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02340-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REGINALD SMITH,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2340 GEB DAD P

vs.

B. NAKU, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a document styled “motion for telephonic conference for

trial rediness [sic] and motion for discovery.” In his motion, plaintiff appears to take some issue

with the status report submitted on behalf of defendants McMaster and Noriega. However, the

court is unable to determine what plaintiff’s complaint is or what relief he is seeking. 

Accordingly, the court must deny plaintiff’s motion.

Plaintiff is advised that the court recently issued a scheduling order in this case. 

Pursuant to that order, the parties may conduct discovery until February 19, 2010. In addition,

the parties may file dispositive motions on or before May 14, 2010. The court will set scheduling

order dates for pretrial conference and jury trial only after the adjudication of any dispositive

motion or upon expiration of the time for filing such a motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). 

Case 2:06-cv-02340-GEB -DAD Document 84 Filed 01/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s November 16, 2009

motion (Doc. No. 83) is denied.

DATED: January 11, 2010.

DAD:9

smit2340.mot

Case 2:06-cv-02340-GEB -DAD Document 84 Filed 01/11/10 Page 2 of 2