Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00695/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00695-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BAHA ZAWAIDEH,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0695 LKK EFB PS

vs.

KEN MORRIS,

Federal Government/Agent,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the

undersigned under Eastern District of California Local Rule (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21), pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On June 24, 2010, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave

to amend. Dckt. No. 3. The order explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff thirty

days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure

to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

The thirty-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

otherwise responded to the order.

////

////

Case 2:10-cv-00695-LKK -EFB Document 4 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule

110. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 10, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-00695-LKK -EFB Document 4 Filed 08/10/10 Page 2 of 2