Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06663/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06663-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Contitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CENTRAL VALLEY CHRYLSER-JEEP, )

INC., et al., )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

)

CATHERINE E. WITHERSPOON, )

)

)

Defendant. )

)

)

No. CV-F-04-6663 REC/LJO

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS'

EX PARTE APPLICATION (Doc.

101) AND CONTINUING ORAL

ARGUMENT ON MOTIONS SET FOR

JUNE 13, 2005 TO MONDAY,

JULY 25, 2005 AT 9:00 A.M.

The court hereby grants plaintiffs' "Ex Parte Application

for Leave to Allow Plaintiff to File Written Responses to the

Evidentiary Objections of Defendant Filed May 27, 2005".

The court hereby continues oral argument on defendant's

motion to dismiss, and the motion to intervene filed by Sierra

Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Environmental

Defense; by Bluewater Network, Global Exchange and Rainforest

Action Network; and by Association of International Automobile

Manufacturers from June 13, 2005 to Monday, July 25, 2005 at 9:00

Case 1:04-cv-06663-AWI-GSA Document 105 Filed 06/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

a.m. The volume and complexity of the various briefs and other

documents and the issues raised therein filed by the moving and

opposing parties, including the recent evidentiary objections and

responses thereto, preclude the court from being fully prepared

for oral argument on June 13. The court will require that

plaintiffs and defendant's attorneys meet and confer concerning

defendant's evidentiary objections and file a pleading with the

court advising the court which evidentiary objections, if any,

remain in dispute. Such pleading shall be filed with the court

no later than July 10. In addition, if any issues raised in the

motion to dismiss become moot before July 25, the court should be

advised in writing as soon as possible. 

The court orders that all parties to this action, including

proposed intervenors, provide the court with one chambers copy,

which includes a date filed stamp and exhibit tabs, of all future

pleadings and declarations filed in this action pertaining to any

motion to be heard by the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06663-AWI-GSA Document 105 Filed 06/09/05 Page 2 of 2