Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00059/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00059-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

Stipulation for an Extension of Time; 2:14-cv-00059-KJN 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628

Special Assistant United States Attorney

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8956

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

HAROLD GRINSTEAD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 2:14-cv-00059-KJN

STIPULATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF 

TIME OF 30 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT’S 

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 

counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of an additional 30 days to 

respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. This is the first continuance sought by 

Defendant. The current due date is September 5, 2014. The new due date will be October 5, 

2014. 

There is good cause for this request. Defendant is seeking this extension due to 

Defendant’s counsel’s heavy workload in the last two months and continuing heavy workload, 

and due to pre-approved leave in September. For the last two months, Defendant’s counsel was 

limited in her ability to work on this case due to two Equal Employment Opportunity 

Commission (EEOC) cases, one of which had an out-of-state hearing in Phoenix, Arizona, and 

Case 2:14-cv-00059-KJN Document 17 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation for an Extension of Time; 2:14-cv-00059-KJN 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

involved follow-up and written closing briefs after the hearing, while the other had a motion for 

summary judgment coming due in September. Counsel also had a Ninth Circuit opposition brief 

due in August, and has another Ninth Circuit answering brief due in the next month, and at least 

16 pending district court cases at various stages of litigation in the next month. Because of the 

factors described above, defense counsel is requesting additional time to fully review the 

administrative record and research the issues presented by Plaintiff’s motion for summary 

judgment.

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified 

accordingly.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: September 4, 2014 HADLEY & FRAULOB

s/ Joseph Fraulob by C.Chen* 

(As authorized by e-mail on 9/4/2014)

JOSEPH FRAULOB

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Date: September 4, 2014 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

 By s/ Carolyn B. Chen 

CAROLYN B. CHEN

Special Assistant U. S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:

Dated: September 5, 2014

Case 2:14-cv-00059-KJN Document 17 Filed 09/05/14 Page 2 of 2