Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00249/USCOURTS-caed-1_22-cv-00249-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLAN FLETCHER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CLENDENIN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:22-cv-00249-JLT-BAM (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION (1) TO DECLARE 

PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT; 

(2) FOR AN ORDER FOR SECURITY; 

(3) FOR ENTRY OF A PREFILING ORDER; 

AND (4) REQUEST FOR STAY

(Doc. 32)

Plaintiff Allan Fletcher is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On June 27, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 

that defendants’ motion to declare plaintiff a vexatious litigant, (Doc. 25), be denied, without 

prejudice to refiling. (Doc. 32.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties

and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. 

(Id. at 5.) No objections have been filed, and the deadline to do so has expired.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:

Case 1:22-cv-00249-JLT-BAM Document 33 Filed 07/26/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. The findings and recommendations issued on June 27, 2023, (Doc. 32), are 

ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. Defendants’ motion to declare plaintiff a vexatious litigant, (Doc. 25), is DENIED, 

without prejudice to refiling.

3. This action is referred back to the magistrate judge for proceedings consistent with this 

order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2023 

Case 1:22-cv-00249-JLT-BAM Document 33 Filed 07/26/23 Page 2 of 2