Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01777/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01777-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS (SCBN 9990)

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON (SBN 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

OWEN P. MARTIKAN (SBN 177104)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue,9th Floor

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-7241

Facsimile: (415) 436-6748

Email: owen.martikan@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Federal Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JANE DOE and MARY ROE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GENERAL MICHAEL W. HAGEE,

Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps,

THE U.S. MARINE CORPS, DONALD C.

WINTER, Secretary of the Navy, THE U.S.

NAVY, BRIAN FUKUSHIMA, JOSEPH

DUNZWEILER, and DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-01777 MHP

E-FILING CASE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REQUESTING

CONTINUANCE OF DISPOSITIVE

MOTION DATES AND SOME

DISCOVERY MATTERS

The parties stipulate and respectfully request the Court to continue the dispositive motion

briefing and hearing dates by two weeks, and to allow plaintiffs to take two depositions – of

Special Agent Kevin Toevs and Major Doug Alexander – after the fact discovery cutoff, if they

choose to.

The reasons for defendants’ request to change the dispositive motion schedule are (1)

defendants’ counsel has just been assigned to a trial beginning on July 9, which is the current

dispositive motion hearing date; (2) the parties have a settlement conference set for next

Wednesday, which could render further proceedings moot; and (3) the deposition of one plaintiff 

Case 3:06-cv-01777-MHP Document 51 Filed 05/24/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP TO MOVE MOTION DATES AND SOME DISCOVERY & [PROPOSED] ORDER

C 06-01777 MHP 2

will not take place until the day before or after the settlement conference, which means that the

deposition transcript would not be available for the motion. The reason for plaintiffs’ request to

take two depositions after the fact discovery cut-off is that both depositions require travel to the

Washington, D.C. area, and the expense and time that these depositions will cost might be saved

if the settlement conference is successful.

So stipulated and respectfully submitted,

For the Federal Defendants.

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS

United States Attorney

/s/

Dated: May 21, 2007 

OWEN P. MARTIKAN

Assistant United States Attorney

For the Plaintiffs.

/s/

Dated: May 21, 2007 _ 

MICHAEL S. SORGEN

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation and for good cause shown, dispositive motions shall be filed by

June 15, 2007, oppositions shall be filed by July 2, 2007, replies shall be filed by July 9, 2007,

and the hearing shall take place on July 23, 2007 at 2:00pm. The depositions of Special Agent

Kevin Toevs and Major Doug Alexander may take place after the fact discovery cutoff.

SO ORDERED.

Dated:

________________________________

HON. MARILYN H. PATEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

at a date set by the court at the July 23, 2007 hearing. May 23, 2007

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-01777-MHP Document 51 Filed 05/24/07 Page 2 of 2