Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05456/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05456-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM MURPHY, )

 )

Petitioner, )

 )

 v. )

 )

ANA RAMIREZ PALMER, )

 )

 )

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

1:02-CV-05456-OWW-TAG-HC 

 

 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 28)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF

COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On October 21, 2005, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Report and

Case 1:02-cv-05456-OWW -TAG Document 31 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Recommendations recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED on the

merits. (Doc. 28). The Report and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained

notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty days from the date of service of that order. 

After obtaining an extension of time, Petitioner timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's

Report and Recommendations on November 28, 2005. (Doc. 30). 

///

///

///

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations are supported by the

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations issued October 21, 2005 (Doc. 28), are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is Dismissed; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 19, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05456-OWW -TAG Document 31 Filed 12/20/05 Page 2 of 2