Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06254/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-06254-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO TORRES, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

EDWARD S. ALAMEDA, JR., )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:04-cv-06254-OWW-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 35)

ORDER DENYING SECOND AMENDED

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On July 20, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus be DENIED, and the Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of

Respondent. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. On

August 23, 2006, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

Case 1:04-cv-06254-OWW -DLB Document 37 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for

questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 20, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DENIED;

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment for Respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-06254-OWW -DLB Document 37 Filed 09/13/06 Page 2 of 2