Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01393/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-01393-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE 

Case No. 3:16-cv-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

 Christopher S. Yates (SBN 161273) 

 Christopher B. Campbell (SBN 254776) 

 Brittany N. Lovejoy (SBN 286813) 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111-6538 

Telephone: 415.391.0600 

Facsimile: 415.395.8095 

Email: chris.yates@lw.com 

 christopher.campbell@lw.com 

 brittany.lovejoy@lw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Oracle America, Inc., and Oracle 

International Corporation 

JEFFREY T. THOMAS, SBN 106409 

jtthomas@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

3161 Michelson Drive 

Irvine, CA 92612-4412 

Telephone: 949.451.3800 

Facsimile: 949.451.4220 

SAMUEL LIVERSIDGE, SBN 180578 

sliversidge@gibsondunn.com 

BLAINE H. EVANSON, SBN 254338 

bevanson@gibsondunn.com 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 

Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; ORACLE INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, a California corporation 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 

1–50, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01393-JST 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER BY 

DEFENDANT HEWLETT PACKARD 

ENTERPRISE COMPANY AND 

PLAINTIFFS ORACLE AMERICA 

INC. AND ORACLE INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION TO TAKE LIMITED 

DISCOVERY AFTER THE FACT 

DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 422 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 3
1 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE 

Case No. 3:16-cv-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle International Corporation (together “Oracle”) and 

Defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“HPE”) (together, the “Parties”) submit the 

following joint stipulation in response to the Court’s October 16, 2017 order entered by Magistrate 

Judge Laporte concerning a Joint Discovery Letter Brief submitted by the Parties pursuant to Local 

Rule 37-3 (the “October 16 Order”): 

WHEREAS, fact discovery in this matter closed on October 2, 2017 (ECF No. 312); 

WHEREAS, Local Rule 37-3 permits the parties to submit motions to compel discovery “7 

days after the discovery cut-off”; 

WHEREAS, on October 3, 2017, the Parties submitted a Joint Discovery Letter Brief wherein 

HPE sought to compel Oracle to produce documents and deposition testimony from Mark Hurd and 

Oracle sought to compel HPE to produce documents and deposition testimony from Meg Whitman 

(ECF No. 354); 

WHEREAS, on October 16, 2017, Magistrate Judge Laporte issued an Order on the Parties’ 

Joint Discovery Letter Brief (ECF No. 394); 

WHEREAS, the October 16 Order requires Oracle to do the following: “Within two weeks, 

Oracle shall search the collection of Hurd documents described in the parties’ joint letter brief and 

produce any non-privileged documents that result, with any redacted documents and a privilege log 

covering all redacted or withheld-in-full documents to follow shortly thereafter.” (id.); 

WHEREAS, the October 16 Order further requires Oracle to “produce Hurd for a deposition, 

on a date that is mutually acceptable to the parties. The deposition is limited to 4 hours and to Hurd’s 

knowledge of customers’ rationales for leaving or returning to Oracle. The parties should agree to 

extend the deposition if solid justification appears.” (id.); 

WHEREAS, the October 16 Order requires HPE to, “within one week, . . . produce the emails 

between Whitman and an HPE customer, referred to in the parties’ joint letter brief at page 9, as 

originally exchanged.” (id.); 

WHEREAS, the aforementioned discovery ordered in the October 16 Order will take place 

after the discovery cutoff of October 2, 2017, and Judge Laporte instructed the Parties to “seek leave 

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 422 Filed 10/24/17 Page 2 of 3
2 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE 

Case No. 3:16-cv-01393-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

of the District Judge to take this discovery after the fact discovery deadline.” (id.); 

WHEREAS, in light of Judge Laporte’s October 16 Order, good cause exists to permit this 

limited discovery after the fact discovery cutoff; 

WHEREAS, for the avoidance of doubt, the Parties are not proposing an extension of the fact 

discovery period; rather, the Parties are merely seeking this Court’s approval to exchange discovery 

after the fact discovery cutoff as ordered by Judge Laporte, and as anticipated by the Local Rules; 

WHEREAS, nothing in this stipulation shall be interpreted as any waiver of the Parties’ rights 

to relief from Judge Laporte’s October 16 Order; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court permit the Parties 

to exchange the discovery ordered by Judge Laporte in the October 16 Order by the dates set forth in 

that Order. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: October 20, 2017 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By: /s/ Samuel G. Liversidge 

Samuel G. Liversidge 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company 

Dated: October 20, 2017 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

 

 By: _ /s/ Christopher S. Yates_____________ 

 Christopher S. Yates 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle International 

 Corporation 

 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: By:______________________________

 THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

October 24, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-01393-JST Document 422 Filed 10/24/17 Page 3 of 3