Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00147/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00147-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUGENE E. FORTE,

 Plaintiff,

v.

MERCED COUNTY, ERIC DUMARS, 

MERCED COUNTY PUBLIC 

DEFENDERS OFFICE, JERRY 

O’BANION, MERCED COUNTY BOARD 

OF SUPERVISORS, CHRIS JASKOWIAK, 

CHRIS PICINICH, MIKE HILL, ADAM 

LEUCHNER, HERMAN PROCK, 

GEOFFREY ROGERS, DAVID SCOTT, 

JAMES PADRON, ANTHONY PARKER, 

LARRY MORSE, ALAN TURNER, 

MERCED COUNTY DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, MERCED 

COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE, JAMES 

FINCHER, ROGER MATZKIND, 

MERCED COUNTY ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE, MERCED COUNTY DEFENSE 

ASSOCATION, CINDY MORSE, 

THOMAS PFEIFF, DAVE CAPRON, JEFF 

BERGER, DR. RICHARD A. BLAK, 

THOMAS CAVALERRO, CITY OF LOS 

BANOS, STEVE RATH, GARY BRIZZEE, 

CONNIE McGHEE, CENTRAL SAN 

JOAQUIN VALLEY RISK 

MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, RAYMA 

CHURCH, RYAN LIBKE, JAMES 

WEAKLEY, BRANDE GUSTAFSON, 

LOUIS LEONE, CLAUDIA LEED, 

GREGARY DE LA PENA, STEVEN 

ROYCRAFT, BENJAMIN RATCLIFF, 

WILLIAM LAPCEVICH, HYATT 

SUMMERFIELD SUITES, ANA VILLA, 

PLEASANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

JERRY NICELEY, MARDENE LASHLEY, 

OFFICER MARTENS, TOMMY JONES, 

GREGORY CHAPPEL, BARBARA 

O’NEILL, FRANK DOUGHERTY, JAMES 

CADLE, MERCED SUPERIOR COURT, 

LARRY COMBS, KEN WILDERSON, JOE 

SOUSA, MANUAL FARIA, MICHAEL 

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-0147 -----BAM

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE 

ELECTRONICALLY WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Case 1:15-cv-00147-DAD-BAM Document 6 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Eugene Forte (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1985, 1986 and 1988 and various state law related claims. 

On February 12, 2015, Plaintiff filed a request to file documents electronically in the Court’s CM/ECF 

system. 

Contemporaneously filed with this order, the Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint and 

finds that the complaint fails to state a cognizable claim. The complaint has been dismissed with leave 

to amend. Until such time as Plaintiff files an amended complaint and that complaint is found to state 

a cognizable claim pursuant to screening standards, Plaintiff will be denied electronic filing status. 

Accordingly, the request to file electronically is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 18, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

VILLALTA, 

Defendants.

Case 1:15-cv-00147-DAD-BAM Document 6 Filed 06/18/15 Page 2 of 2