Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01566/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01566-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIEIDRA J. THOMAS, No. CIV.S-05-1566 LKK DAD PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS,

et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

Plaintiff having sufficiently responded to the court’s

order to show cause re dismissal for lack of prosecution, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The order to show cause filed April 19, 2006, is

discharged;

2. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for

August 4, 2006, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 27, before the

undersigned;

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01566-LKK -DAD Document 23 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. The parties shall submit to the court, no later than

seven days before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, a

status report addressing the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Any expected or desired amendment of

the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling

thereof;

f. Anticipated discovery and the

scheduling thereof, including

disclosure of expert witnesses;

g. Future proceedings, including setting

appropriate cut-off dates for discovery

and law and motion, and the scheduling

of a final pretrial conference and

trial;

h. Modification of standard pretrial

procedures specified by the rules due

to the relative simplicity or

complexity of the action;

i. Whether the case is related to any

other case, including matters in

bankruptcy;

j. Whether the parties will stipulate to

the magistrate judge assigned to this

matter acting as settlement judge,

waiving any disqualifications by virtue

of his so acting, or whether they

prefer to have a Settlement Conference

before another judge; 

k. Any other matters that may add to the

just and expeditious disposition of

this action; and

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01566-LKK -DAD Document 23 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

l. Whether the parties intend to consent

to proceed before a United States

Magistrate Judge; and

4. Plaintiff is forewarned that the failure to comply with

the terms of this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal.

DATED: June 23, 2006.

DAD:th

DDad1/orders.prose/thomas1566.discharge

Case 2:05-cv-01566-LKK -DAD Document 23 Filed 06/26/06 Page 3 of 3