Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-00036/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-00036-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) 

4019798_1.DOC 

MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 64037 

 Email: mladra@wsgr.com 

JAMES C. YOON, State Bar No. 177155 

 Email: jyoon@wsgr.com 

STEFANI E. SHANBERG, State Bar No. 206717 

 Email: sshanberg@wsgr.com 

ARIANA M. CHUNG-HAN (State Bar No. 197572) 

 Email: achung@wsgr.com 

ROBIN L. BREWER, State Bar No. 253686 

 Email: rbrewer@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

FORTINET, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., and 

PATRICK R. BROGAN, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) 

ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

FILE DOCUMENTS AND PORTIONS 

OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

PERTAINING TO FORTINET, INC.’S 

OBJECTIONS AND MOTION TO 

STRIKE NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW 

ARGUMENTS PRESENTED IN PALO 

ALTO NETWORKS, INC.’S REPLY 

MEMORANDA IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

)

)

)

Case 5:09-cv-00036-RMW Document 177 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) 

- 1 - 4019798_1.DOC 

Having considered Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc.’s administrative 

motion to file under seal portions of Fortinet’s Objections and Motion to Strike New Evidence 

and New Arguments Presented in Palo Alto Networks, Inc.’s (“PAN”) Reply Memoranda in 

Support of Motions for Summary Judgment (“Objections and Motion to Strike”), and Exhibits 1, 

2, and 4 thereto, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(c) and good cause appearing: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Fortinet’s administrative motion is GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the following portions of Fortinet’s Objections and Motion to Strike shall 

be filed under seal: 

a) 2:18-22 (following “because . . .” through end of sentence); 

b) 2:23-24 (following “maintained that the . . .” through before “. . . and, as a 

result”); 

c) 2:27-3:1 (following “testimony that . . .” through before “. . . did PAN then 

backpedal”); 

d) 3:3-4 (following “position that the . . .” through end of sentence); 

e) 3:5-7 (following “(emphasis added) . . .” through end of sentence); 

f) 3:7-8 (following “noninfringement argument . . .” through before “. . . was 

baseless”); 

g) 3:11 (the six words following “must mean . . .”); 

h) 3:12 (beginning of the line through end of sentence); 

i) 5:3 (beginning of the line through end of sentence); 

j) 5:3-6 (following “See Doc # 117 at 7 . . .” through end of sentence); 

k) 5:8-9 (following “PAN admitted that . . .” through end of sentence); 

l) 5:13-14 (following “because . . .” through end of sentence); 

m) 5:17 (the three words following “did it argue that. . .”). 

// 

// 

// 

// 

Case 5:09-cv-00036-RMW Document 177 Filed 07/19/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

CASE NO.: CV 08-05371 MMC

-2- 4019798_1.DOC 

Further, Exhibits 1, 2 and 4 attached thereto shall be filed under seal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: July 19, 2010 

 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

 United States District Court Judge 

Presented by: 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

 /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg 

Stefani E. Shanberg 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

FORTINET, INC. 

Case 5:09-cv-00036-RMW Document 177 Filed 07/19/10 Page 3 of 3