Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02098/USCOURTS-caed-2_23-cv-02098-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WILLIAM PATRICK GARCIA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

D. DENBERG, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:23-cv-02098-KJM-DMC-P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern 

District of California local rules. 

 On June 6, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 

served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the 

time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 

602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 

de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 

by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 

. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

Case 2:23-cv-02098-DC-DMC Document 19 Filed 08/19/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 6, 2024, ECF No. 12, are 

adopted in full. 

 2. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment safety claims 

against all defendants named in the first amended complaint (B. Denberg, G. Kong, J. Kinross, A. 

Silva, C. Gipson, and K. Armstrong). 

 3. All other claims are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief 

can be granted. 

 4. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further 

proceedings. 

DATED: August 16, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-02098-DC-DMC Document 19 Filed 08/19/24 Page 2 of 2