Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02457/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02457-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2729

Attorneys for Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OMAR ASKAR,

Plaintiff,

v.

Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland

Security, et al.

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 07-S-CV-2457

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:

EXTENSION OF TIME

This is an immigration case in which plaintiff has challenged the delay in the adjudication of

his application to adjust status by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS). Defendants

respectfully inform the Court that the delay in the adjudication is the Federal Bureau of

Investigations’ background name check. In the hopes that the name check will be completed

shortly and this matter will become moot, the parties stipulate to a 60-day extension of time for

the filing of the government’s answer to the complaint. 

The parties therefore stipulate that the time for filing the government’s answer be extended to

March 14, 2008, and that the scheduling conference, currently set for February 4, 2008, be reset

to sometime after the new answer due date.

 

Dated: January 3, 2008

Case 2:07-cv-02457-LKK -GGH Document 5 Filed 01/16/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/Audrey Hemesath

Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

By: /s/ John D. Friedman

John D. Friedman

Attorney for the Plaintiff

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the defendants’ Answer is due on March 14, 2008, and that the scheduling

conference is reset to April 7, 2008 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 16, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-02457-LKK -GGH Document 5 Filed 01/16/08 Page 2 of 2