Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

KERRY REARDON, et al., CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05678-JST 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 

 v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Defendant(s). 

_______________________________/ 

 

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

 Court Processes:

 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

 X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

 Private Process:

 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

 

 X other deadline: November 30, 2015 

Dated: March 13, 2015 /s/ Hassan A. Zavareei 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: March 13, 2015 /s/ Susan J. Welde 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE 

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 32 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER

 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: __________________________________ 

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

 

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

 

Rev. 12/11 

 Page 2 of 2 

March 17, 2015 XX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 32 Filed 03/17/15 Page 2 of 2