Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06461/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06461-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVERETT PARKER,

Plaintiff, CV F 03 6461 AWI WMW P

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

MTA BISHOP, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is former state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On March 14, 2006, an order to show cause was entered, directing plaintiff to

show cause, within thirty days, why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to

prosecute. The thirty day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed a response to the order to

show cause.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

thirty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Case 1:03-cv-06461-AWI-WMW Document 28 Filed 04/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 24, 2006 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06461-AWI-WMW Document 28 Filed 04/24/06 Page 2 of 2