Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02280/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02280-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 CASE NO. 09-CV-02280-WHA 

EDWARD R. REINES (STATE BAR NO. 135960) 

edward.reines@weil.com 

NICHOLAS A. BROWN (STATE BAR NO. 198210) 

nick.brown@weil.com 

PAUL T. EHRLICH (STATE BAR NO. 228543) 

paul.ehrlich@weil.com 

JILL J. HO (STATE BAR NO. 236349) 

jill.ho@weil.com 

L. OKEY ONYEJEKWE, JR. (STATE BAR NO. 250354) 

okey.onyejekwe@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Silicon Valley Office 

201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Telephone: (650) 802-3000 

Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 

M. PATRICIA THAYER (STATE BAR NO. 90818) 

pthayer@orrick.com 

KATHLEEN D. PATTERSON (STATE BAR NO. 124768) 

kpatterson@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

The Orrick Building 

405 Howard Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 

Telephone: (415) 773-5700 

Facsimile: (415) 773-5759 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CONCEPTUS INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CONCEPTUS INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOLOGIC, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 09-cv-02280-WHA 

STIPULATION REGARDING ASSERTED 

CLAIMS AND JOINT MOTION TO 

DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE CLAIMS AND 

COUNTERCLAIMS PERTAINING TO 

UNASSERTED PATENTS AND CLAIMS 

Complaint Filed: 5/22/09 

Trial Date: None Set 

The Honorable William H. Alsup 

Case3:09-cv-02280-WHA Document140 Filed01/19/10 Page1 of 2

AND ORDER

Case 3:09-cv-02280-WHA Document 141 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 Case No. 09-cv-02280-WHA 

 

Plaintiff Conceptus, Inc. (“Conceptus”) and Defendant Hologic, Inc. (“Hologic”) 

hereby stipulate that Conceptus shall restrict its claims of infringement and Hologic shall restrict 

its claims of invalidity to Claims 8, 37, and 38 of U.S. Patent No. 6,634,361 (“the ’361 patent”) 

and Claims 5 and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 7,506,650 (“the ’650 patent”). Accordingly, Conceptus 

and Hologic jointly request that the Court dismiss with prejudice the claims and counterclaims 

brought by both parties pertaining to U.S. Patent Nos. 6,709,667, 7237,552, and 7,428,904 and 

the claims and counterclaims brought by both parties pertaining to the ’361 and ’650 patents with 

the exception of Claims 8, 37 and 38 of the ’361 patent and claims 5 and 14 of the ’650 patent. 

Neither side will make reference to a jury that the dismissed patents and claims were once 

asserted in the case. Nor will either party argue that, by dismissing these claims, Conceptus is 

precluded from asserting infringement in this case of the non-withdrawn claims. Hologic shall 

have the right to reassert its invalidity counterclaims in the event of any future claims of 

infringement permissible hereunder of the dismissed patents and claims. 

Dated: January 19, 2010 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE 

By: /s/ M. Patricia Thayer 

M. Patricia Thayer 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Conceptus, Inc. 

Dated: January 19, 2010 HOWREY LLP 

By: /s/ Matthew M. Wolf 

Matthew M. Wolf 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Hologic, Inc. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January ____, 2010 _______________________________ 

 Hon. William H. Alsup 

 United States District Judge 

Case3:09-cv-02280-WHA Document140 Filed01/19/10 Page2 of 2

19

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-02280-WHA Document 141 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 2