Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-19-01474/USCOURTS-ca10-19-01474-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 

---

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

CEDRIC GREENE, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PACIFIC SHORE PROPERTY 

MANAGEMENT,

 Defendant - Appellee.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

CEDRIC GREENE, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PACIFIC SHORE PROPERTY 

MANAGEMENT, INC., 

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 19-1473

No. 19-1474

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

These matters are before us on Appellant’s response to our December 19, 2019 

orders to show cause why these appeals should not be dismissed as prohibited by the 

filing restrictions imposed by this court in Greene v. Sprint Nextel Corporation, 750 F. 

App’x 661, 666-67 (10th Cir. Sept. 20, 2018). Our orders required Appellant to 

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 14, 2020

Christopher M. Wolpert

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 19-1474 Document: 010110288224 Date Filed: 01/14/2020 Page: 1
2

specifically address the basis for the district court’s jurisdiction over the claims he sought 

to raise below. 

Instead of attempting to establish a valid basis for the district court’s jurisdiction, 

Appellant’s response seeks permission to proceed in the District of Colorado because he 

believes it will “provide him an impartial and fair platform to pursue civil rights matters.”

Thus, it appears that Appellant is once again asking this court and/or the district court to 

waive its subject matter jurisdiction, which is expressly prohibited by the aforementioned 

filing restrictions. 

Upon careful consideration of Appellant’s response, these matters are 

DISMISSED. Appellant is strongly cautioned that this court will impose additional filing 

restrictions should he persist in filing cases in disregard of the applicable jurisdictional 

and venue requirements that this court and numerous other courts have explained to him 

on multiple occasions. See id. at 665 n. 1 (noting that this court and numerous district 

courts have explained the jurisdictional and venue requirements to Mr. Greene on at least 

seventeen occasions). The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

Entered for the Court

CHRISTOPHER M. WOLPERT, Clerk

Appellate Case: 19-1474 Document: 010110288224 Date Filed: 01/14/2020 Page: 2