Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02558/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-02558-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OBDULIO JIMINEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICHAEL MARTEL, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:16-cv-2558 AC P 

ORDER and 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 This prisoner civil rights action is referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c). 

 On October 27, 2016, plaintiff filed a complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 

However, plaintiff had signed neither document. By order filed October 31, 2016, this court 

dismissed these matters and granted plaintiff leave to file, within thirty days, a new complaint and 

motion to proceed in forma pauperis, each bearing plaintiff’s dated signature. See ECF No. 4. 

Plaintiff was informed that failure to timely comply with the court’s order would result in a 

recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Id. at 2. 

 More than thirty days have passed and plaintiff has not filed the required documents or 

otherwise communicated with the court. Moreover, review of the Inmate Locator website 

operated by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation indicates that plaintiff is 

Case 2:16-cv-02558-WBS-AC Document 5 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

no longer incarcerated under the authority of the CDCR.1 For these reasons, the undersigned will 

recommend dismissal of this action. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a 

district judge to this case. 

 Additionally, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) 

days after being served with these findings and recommendations,2 plaintiff may file written 

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: December 15, 2016 

 

1

 See http://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/search.aspx. See also Fed. R. Evid. 201 (court may take 

judicial notice of facts that are capable of accurate determination by sources whose accuracy 

cannot reasonably be questioned). 

2

 Absent a timely notice of change of address, the Clerk of Court shall serve this order on 

plaintiff at his current address of record, the California Health Care Facility. Service of 

documents at a pro se party’s address of record is deemed fully effective. Local Rule 182(f). 

Case 2:16-cv-02558-WBS-AC Document 5 Filed 12/15/16 Page 2 of 2