Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00476/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-00476-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROWENA G. CU-UNJIENG, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-10-0476 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF

DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On February 9, 2010, plaintiffs Rowena G. Cu-Unjieng, Victor Cu-Unjieng, and

Christina Cu-Unjieng electronically filed a motion to remand. Thereafter, on February 12,

2010, defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. electronically filed a motion to dismiss.

Each of the above-referenced parties has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on

the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy

of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly

marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See

General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of their motion to remand,

Case 3:10-cv-00476-MMC Document 8 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of its motion to dismiss. The

above-referenced parties are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply with

General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each

electronically-filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 2, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:10-cv-00476-MMC Document 8 Filed 03/02/10 Page 2 of 2