Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01279/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-01279-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

INTEL CORPORATION and ARM, INC.,

Defendants. /

No. C 14-01279 WHA

ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

OF MOTION FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

An August 19, 2014 order granted Intel Corporation’s motion to declare pro se Michael

Bruzzone a vexatious litigant (Dkt. No. 88). On December 15, Bruzzone filed a motion to refer

the undersigned to the Standing Committee on Professional Conduct and directed his motion to

Chief Judge Hamilton. On December 17, Chief Judge Hamilton denied Bruzzone’s motion and

stated that the Court would “not entertain any motions for reconsideration of this order” (Dkt.

No. 116). Bruzzone has filed another motion seeking the same relief (Dkt. No. 118). 

Bruzzone’s motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 19, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:14-cv-01279-WHA Document 119 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 1