Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07748/USCOURTS-ca4-15-07748-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7748

ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TERRY MCAULIFFE, Virginia Governor; HARVEY BRYANT, 

Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; KATHERINE ORSINI,

Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; CATHERINE 

DODSON, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach; 

CALVIN DEPEW, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia 

Beach; LEAH DARRON, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia; 

PETER LEGLER, Virginia Beach Public Defender; ANNET MILLER, 

Virginia Beach Public Defender; BENJAMIN THOMAS REED, Court 

Appointed Defense Attorney; SHEPHERD WAINGER, Direct Appeal 

Attorney; J. BRADLEY REAVES, Direct Appeal Attorney; DAVID 

EBERHARDT, State Department; RICHARD E. LUBOW, State 

Department; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; EDWARD HANSON, 

Virginia Beach Circuit Court Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00214-JRS-RCY)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-7748 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-7748 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See Makdessi v. 

McAuliffe, No. 3:14-cv-00214-JRS-RCY (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-7748 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/01/2016 Pg: 3 of 3