Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01593/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01593-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHS West:260189968.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING DATE

C 04-01593 JW

CHARLES A. REID, III (SBN 221306)

CHERYL A. SABNIS (SBN 224323)

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105-2235

Telephone: (415) 591-7500

Facsimile: (415) 591-7510

Appearing Pro Hac Vice

WILLIAM T. CORBETT, JR.

MARK D. SHERIDAN

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

500 Campus Drive

Florham Park, New Jersey 07932-1047

Telephone: (973) 360-1100

Facsimile: (973) 360-9831 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA and

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL 

UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY

ROBERT E. FREITAS (SBN 80948)

DANIEL J. WEINBERG (SBN 227159)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: 650-614-7400

Facsimile: 650-614-7401

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA; et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. C 04-01593 JW (HRL)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING 

DATE ON PLAINTIFF'S 

ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

DEFENDANT'S ANTICIPATED 

REQUEST FOR JUDGMENT

[Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12]

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC

Counterclaimant,

v.

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA; et al.,

Counterclaim Defendants.

Case 3:04-cv-01593-WHA Document 190 Filed 03/08/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHS West:260189968.1 - 1 -

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING DATE

C 04-01593 JW

Pursuant to Civil L. R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, plaintiffs National Union Fire Insurance

Company Of Pittsburgh, Pa (“National Union”) and American International Underwriters

Insurance Company (“AIU”) (National Union and AIU referred to collectively as “Plaintiffs”) 

and defendant Seagate Technology LLC (“Seagate” or “Defendant”) file this Stipulation and 

[Proposed] Order continuing the hearing date on (1) Plaintiff's anticipated motion for summary 

judgment terminating the duty to defend, and (2) Defendant's anticipated request for judgment

pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

On January 16, 2007, Plaintiffs and Seagate filed a joint case management conference 

statement in advance of a January 22, 2007 case management conference. See Docket Item No. 

185. On January 18, the Court, sua sponte, vacated the case management conference and ordered 

that the Court would conduct a hearing on (1) Plaintiff's anticipated motion for summary 

judgment terminating the duty to defend, and (2) Seagate's anticipated request for judgment

pursuant to Rule 54(b) on April 23, 2007 at 9 a.m. See Docket Item No. 187. The Court further 

ordered that the parties file their moving papers according to the schedule established by the 

Court's Local Rules. Id.

Seagate's lead counsel is scheduled to begin trial in an unrelated matter on April 23, 2007 

at 9 a.m., in the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. That trial, In re Dynamic 

Random Access Memory Antitrust Litigation, Case No. M-02-1486-PJH, is scheduled to last six 

weeks. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to continue the hearing date on (1) Plaintiff's 

anticipated motion for summary judgment terminating the duty to defend, and (2) Seagate's 

anticipated request for judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) from April 23, 2007 at 9 a.m. to June 

18, 2007 at 9 a.m. The parties further stipulate to file all moving papers according to the 

schedule established by the Court's Local Rules.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

/ / /

Case 3:04-cv-01593-WHA Document 190 Filed 03/08/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OHS West:260189968.1 - 2 -

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING DATE

C 04-01593 JW

Dated: March 7, 2007 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP

/s/ Daniel J. Weinberg /s/

Daniel J. Weinberg

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

Seagate Technology LLC

Dated: March 7, 2007 DRINKER, BIDDLE & REATH, LLP

/s/ Mark D. Sheridan /s/

Mark D. Sheridan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-defendants

National Union Fire Insurance Company of 

Pittsburgh, PA and American International 

Underwriters Insurance Company

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, §X(B), I attest under penalty of 

perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory. 

Dated: March 7, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Daniel J. Weinberg /s/

Daniel J. Weinberg

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________________ _________________________________________

Judge of the Northern District of California

Plaintiff's anticipated Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant's 

Motion for Summary Judgment are continued from April 23 2007 to 

June 18 2007 @ 9:00 AM 3/8/2007

Case 3:04-cv-01593-WHA Document 190 Filed 03/08/07 Page 3 of 3