Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02252/USCOURTS-cand-3_01-cv-02252-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADVANCEMENT OF HEARING DATE FOR WAL-MART’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO.: C 01-2252-CRB 

Brad Seligman (SBN 083838) 

Jocelyn D. Larkin (SBN 110817) 

THE IMPACT FUND 

125 University Avenue 

Berkeley, CA 94710 

Telephone: 510.845.3473 

Facsimile: 510.845.3654 

bseligman@impactfund.org

jlarkin@impactfund.org

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. (SBN 132099) 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

TBoutrous@gibsondunn.com 

Attorneys for Defendant

Joseph M. Sellers (pro hac vice)

Christine E. Webber (pro hac vice)

Jenny R. Yang (pro hac vice)

Peter Romer-Friedman (pro hac vice)

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 

West Tower, Suite 500 

1100 New York Avenue 

Washington, DC 20005 

Telephone: 202.408.4600 

Facsimile: 202.408.4699 

jsellers@cohenmilstein.com 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERNDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

BETTY DUKES, PATRICIA SURGESON, 

EDITH ARANA, DEBORAH GUNTER and 

CHRISTINE KWAPNOSKI, on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

WAL-MART STORES, INC., 

Defendant.

 CASE NO.:C 01-2252-CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING ADVANCEMENT 

OF HEARING DATE FOR WAL-MART’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOURTH 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Betty Dukes, Patricia Surgeson, Edith Arana, Deborah 

Gunter, and Christine Kwapnoski (“Named Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“WalMart”), hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

WHEREAS, on January 13, 2012, Wal-Mart filed its Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended 

Complaint and noticed a hearing on the motion for May 11, 2012, see Dkt. 781; 

WHEREAS, on March 23, 2012, this Court advanced the hearing date from May 11, 2012 to 

Case 3:01-cv-02252-CRB Document 801 Filed 04/18/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADVANCEMENT OF HEARING DATE FOR WAL-MART’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO.: C 01-2252-CRB 

May 7, 2012, see Dkt. 788;

WHEREAS, on April 10, 2012, this Court continued the hearing date from May 7, 2012 to 

June 22, 2012, see Dkt. 794; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Named Plaintiffs are unavailable on June 22, 2012; 

WHEREAS, the Office of the Calendar Clerk has advised counsel that the Court may be 

available to hear Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint on June 8, 2012; 

WHEREAS, counsel for Named Plaintiffs and counsel for Wal-Mart are available on June 8, 

2012 to be heard on Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, all briefing on Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint 

has been submitted to the Court; 

THEREFORE, Named Plaintiffs and Wal-Mart stipulate and agree that the hearing date on 

Wal-Mart’s Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint be advanced to June 8, 2012. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 17, 2012 

By: /s/ Joseph M. Sellers _ By: /s/ Theodore S. Boutrous, Jr. 

Joseph M. Sellers (pro hac vice) Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. (SBN 132099) 

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

West Tower, 100 New York Avenue, Suite 500 333 South Grand Avenue 

1100 New York Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: 213.229.7000 

Telephone: 510.845.3473 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 

Facsimile: 510.845.3654 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Attorneys for Named Plaintiffs 

I, Joseph M. Sellers, attest that concurrence 

in the filing of this document has been obtained

from the other signatory.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

 

DATE: _______________ ____________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 CHARLES R. BREYER 

04/18/2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:01-cv-02252-CRB Document 801 Filed 04/18/12 Page 2 of 2