Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06949/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06949-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on as undeliverable. However, 1

plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address

is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BILLY JOE FULTON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MCI WORLDCOM, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-06949-OWW-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 14)

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO

AMEND

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION

Plaintiff, Billy Joe Fulton (“plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 22, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:03-cv-06949-OWW -DLB Document 18 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 22, 2006,

are ADOPTED in full;

2. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is DISMISSED, without

leave to amend in light of his inability to cure the defects

present in his original complaint, for failure to state any

claims upon which relief may be granted; and,

 3. This action is therefore DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 17, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06949-OWW -DLB Document 18 Filed 08/17/06 Page 2 of 2