Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00933/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00933-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK CODAY HILL, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

JAMES A. YATES, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:05-cv-00933-REC-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 17), 

GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION

TO DISMISS (Doc. 10),

DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,

AND DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On January 30, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED, the

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED, and this action be

TERMINATED. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. To

date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings

and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Case 1:05-cv-00933-REC-DLB Document 18 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 30, 2006,

are ADOPTED IN FULL

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss, filed November 9, 2005,

is GRANTED;

3. The instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DISMISSED; and 

4. The Clerk of Court enter judgment for respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 21, 2006 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00933-REC-DLB Document 18 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2