Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02949/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02949-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1121 Trademark Infringement

---

1 TOWNSEND AN TOWNSEND AN CREW LLP

GREGORY S. GILCHRST (State Bar No. 111536)

2 GIA L. CINCONE (State Bar No. 141668)

HOLLY GAUDREAU (State Bar No. 209114)

3 Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor

San Francisco, Californa 94111

4 Telephone: (415) 576-0200

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300

5 gsgilchrst~townsend.com; glcincone~townsend.com

hgaudreau~townsend.com

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff

7 LEVI STRAUSS & CO.

8 UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

10

11 LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

SAN FRACISCO DIVISION

Case No. C 05-02949 MHP

12

13

Plaintiff,

v.

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED)

ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND

EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO

14 BUREIGH POINT, LTD., a Californa CHANGE ADR ELECTION

corporation; ELEMENT SKATEBOARS,

15 INC., a Californa corporation,

16

17

Defendants.

18 This stipulation is made by and between plaintiff, Levi Strauss & Co. and defendants

19 Burleigh Point, Ltd. and Element Skateboards, Inc. (collectively, "defendants"), by their

20 respective counsel, and is based on the following:

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. On Januar 27,2006, the Cour entered an order granting the parties' request for

an extension ofthe mediation deadline until March 17, 2006;

2. The paries in the meantime engaged in extensive settlement discussions and

made substantial progress in reaching resolution of the action. To avoid

unecessar expense and disruption of ongoing negotiations, the paries

contacted the mediator to cancel the mediation previously scheduled for March

9,2006. The paries also informed the mediator of their plan to proceed before

- 1 -

STIPULATION AN (PROPOSED) ORDER Levi Strauss & Co. v. Burleigh Point, Ltd.. et al.

RE SETTLEMENT AN EXTENSION OF DEADLIN TO CHAGE ADR ELECTION Case No. C 05-02949 MHP

Case 3:05-cv-02949-MHP Document 28 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

a Magistrate Judge if settlement could not be accomplished. The mediator was

supportive of this proposed course of action;

3. On March 15, 2006, the paries filed a stipulation with the Cour, agreeing that

if final agreement could not be reached by April 10, 2006, the paries will seek

permission to change their ADR election to appear before a Magistrate Judge

under the Cour's mediation program. The Cour entered an order granting the

paries' request on March 16,2006;

4. Since that time, the paries have tentatively reached agreement and are in the

9 process of finalizing its terms. Because the settlement is nearly complete and

10 wil resolve the action, the paries request additional time to fialize the

11 settlement before seeking permission ftom the Cour to change their ADR

12 election to appear before a Magistrate Judge under the Cour's mediation

13 program.

14 Based on the foregoing, the paries stipulate that they wil seek permission ftom the

15 Cour to change their ADR election and appear before a Magistrate Judge under the Court's

16 mediation program if a final agreement canot be reached by May 5, 2006.

17

18 DATED: April 10, 2006

19

20

21

22

23

24 III

25 III

26 III

27

Respectfully submitted,

By:

REAU

..aa~

AN TOWNSEND AN CREW

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LEVI STRAUSS & CO.

28 - 2-

STIPULATION AN (PROPOSED) ORDER Levi Strauss & Co. v. Burleigh Point, Ltd., et al.

RE SETTLEMENT AN EXTENSION OF DEADLIN TO CHAGE ADR ELECTION Case No. C 05-02949 MH

Case 3:05-cv-02949-MHP Document 28 Filed 04/12/06 Page 2 of 3
. -_...._----_._-..__._--_.._._-_._----------_..__.__. .,-_._.._---~~----~_.

1

2 DATED: April//) 2006

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

._-_..- ._--,,----_.

By:

Attorneys for Defendants

BURIGH POIN, LTD. and ELEMENT

SKATEOARS, mc.

PURSUAN TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERE

10 DATED: April_, 2006

11

12

-13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

- 23

24

25

26

27

28

By:

The Honorable Marlyn Patel

- 3 -

STIULATION AND (pROPOSED) ORDER' Levi Strauss & Co. v. Burleigh Point. Ltd., et al.

RE SEITLEME AN EXTENS¡ON OF DEADLIN TO CHAGE ADR ELECTION Case No. C 05-02949 MH

11

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:05-cv-02949-MHP Document 28 Filed 04/12/06 Page 3 of 3