Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07274/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07274-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

Douglas J. Clark, Cal. State Bar No. 171499 

Ignacio E. Salceda, Cal. State Bar No. 164017 

David L. Lansky, Cal. State Bar No. 199952 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

INDIANA STATE DISTRICT COUNSEL 

LABORERS AND HOD CARRIERS PENSION 

FUND, on behalf of Electronics For Imaging, 

Inc., et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

GUY GECHT, et al., 

 Defendants, 

 and 

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation 

 Nominal Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C06-7274 EMC 

(Consolidated case with C07-0698 EMC) 

TRUEMAN PARISH, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

DAN AVIDA, et al., 

 Defendants, 

 and 

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation 

 Nominal Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C07-0698 EMC 

(Consolidated case with C06-7274 EMC) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO 

DISMISS 

Date: September 19, 2007 

Time: 10:30 AM 

Before: Hon. Edward M. Chen 

Courtroom: C

Case 3:06-cv-07274-EMC Document 62 Filed 07/09/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NOS. C-06-7274 (EMC); C-07-0698 (EMC) 

2 3146578_1.DOC 

It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto as follows: 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Case Management Order entered on April 18, 2007 (the 

“Case Management Order”), Lead Plaintiffs Trueman Parish and Kevin Fennimore filed their 

Consolidated Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) on May 24, 2007; 

WHEREAS, Defendants intend to move to dismiss the Complaint; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Case Management Order, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is 

currently due by July 5, 2007, Plaintiffs’ Opposition is due by August 3, 2007, Defendants’ 

Reply is due by August 29, 2007, and the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is set for 

September 19, 2007; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the briefing schedule on Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss by one week; and 

WHEREAS, the hearing date set by the Court for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss will 

remain unchanged; 

THEREFORE, the parties to this action, by and through their attorneys, hereby 

STIPULATE AND AGREE, subject to approval of the Court, that: 

1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be filed by July 12, 2007; 

2. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be filed by August 

10, 2007; 

3. Defendants Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 

shall be filed by September 5, 2007; and 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:06-cv-07274-EMC Document 62 Filed 07/09/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NOS. C-06-7274 (EMC); C-07-0698 (EMC) 

3 3146578_1.DOC 

4. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss will remain set for September 19, 

2007 at 10:30 AM. 

Dated: July 6, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, 

Professional Corporation 

 

By: /s/ Ignacio E. Salceda 

 Ignacio E. Salceda 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: July 6, 2007 SCHIFFRIN BARROWAY 

TOPAZ & KESSLER, LLP 

 

By: /s/ Lee D. Rudy 

 Lee D. Rudy 

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:____________________ ____________________________________ 

 The Honorable Edward M. Chen 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

26

5. The Status Conference set for 9/19/07 is also reset for 9/26/07 at 10:30 a.m. An updated 

joint status conference statement is due on 9/19/07. 

 July 9, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:06-cv-07274-EMC Document 62 Filed 07/09/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NOS. C-06-7274 (EMC); C-07-0698 (EMC) 

4 3146578_1.DOC 

I, Ignacio E. Salceda, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Modifying Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss. 

I hereby attest that Lee D. Rudy has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: July 6, 2007 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, 

Professional Corporation 

 

By: /s/ Ignacio E. Salceda 

 Ignacio E. Salceda 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 3:06-cv-07274-EMC Document 62 Filed 07/09/07 Page 4 of 4