Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-05108/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-05108-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7/3/20062111122222 1

____________________________________________1

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Craig C. Corbitt (CA State Bar No. 83251) 

Judith A. Zahid (CA State Bar No. 215418) 

Matthew R. Schultz (CA State Bar No. 220641) 

ZELLE, HOFMANN, VOELBEL, 

 MASON & GETTE LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 693-0700 

Facsimile: (415) 693-0770 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MIKE’S MEDICAL CENTER PHARMACY 

and DANIEL P. DONOVAN, INC. d/b/a WEST 

MARIN PHARMACY, individually and on 

behalf of themselves and all others similarly 

situated, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.; PAID 

PRESCRIPTIONS, L.L.C.; and MERCK & 

CO., INC., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV-05-05108 MMC 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Before the Court is the parties’ Request To Continue The Case Management 

Conference, filed June 30, 2006, in which the parties have jointly requested a continuance of 

the case management conference on the grounds that the motion to transfer filed April 13, 

2006 by plaintiffs in Brady Enterprises, Inc. v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., No. 03-04730 

(E.D. Pa.) (hereinafter, “MDL Transfer Motion”) remains pending before the Judicial Panel 

on Multidistrict Litigation (“MDL panel”). 

Good cause appearing, the Court hereby CONTINUES the case management 

conference to September 29, 2006.1 A joint case management conference statement shall be 

1

 The parties’ requested date of September 22, 2006 is not available. 

Case 3:05-cv-05108-MMC Document 25 Filed 07/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7/3/20062222222222 2

____________________________________________2

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

filed no later than September 22, 2006. If, however, as of September 22, 2006, the motion 

before the MDL panel remains pending, the parties may instead file a joint request and 

proposed order to continue the case management conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 5, 2006

 _________________________________ 

 Maxine M. Chesney 

 United States District Judge 

3165263v1

Case 3:05-cv-05108-MMC Document 25 Filed 07/05/06 Page 2 of 2