Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02587/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02587-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAI ZOU, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WYNDHAM VACATION OWNERSHIP, 

INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-02587-JST 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event Deadline

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings September 9, 2015

Mediation deadline January 31, 20161

Fact discovery cut-off April 21, 2016

Expert disclosures May 20, 2016

Expert rebuttal June 17, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions July 15, 2016

Expert discovery cut-off August 12, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due September 27, 2016

 

1

See ECF No. 22.

Case 3:15-cv-02587-JST Document 24 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Event Deadline

Pretrial conference October 7, 2016 at 

2:00 p.m.

Trial October 31, 2016 at 

8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days) Twelve

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with 

the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their 

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are 

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant 

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause 

to grant a continuance. 

The case management conference currently scheduled for September 14, 2015 is vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 2, 2015

________________________________________

_____________________________________

 JON S. TIGAR

 United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-02587-JST Document 24 Filed 09/02/15 Page 2 of 2