Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_18-cv-04773/USCOURTS-cand-5_18-cv-04773-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SCOTT JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTE BILIC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.18-cv-04773-VKD 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE PROPOSED CONSENT 

DECREE

Re: Dkt. No. 20

On January 22, 2019, plaintiff Scott Johnson and defendants Ante Bilic and Fernando 

Vasquez filed a proposed consent decree resolving Mr. Johnson’s claims with respect to injunctive 

relief. Dkt. No. 20.

Although Mr. Johnson has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, Dkt. No. 7, 

defendants have not yet indicated whether they consent or decline. The Court declines to enter the 

proposed consent decree as an order of judgment, and to retain jurisdiction to enforce it, in the 

absence of full consent of the parties to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The Court therefore denies 

the parties’ proposed consent decree without prejudice to the parties resubmitting their proposed 

consent decree after defendants have indicated whether they consent to or decline magistrate judge 

jurisdiction. See Dkt. Nos. 11, 14, 15. Any resubmitted proposed consent decree should correct 

the error in the footer of Exhibit A to the proposed consent decree that lists an incorrect case 

number. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2019

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:18-cv-04773-VKD Document 21 Filed 01/23/19 Page 1 of 1