Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03217/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03217-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY CURD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

KMART, 

Defendant.

 /

No. C-05-3217 MMC

ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(Docket No. 3)

Before the Court is plaintiff’s application, filed August 8, 2005, to proceed in forma

pauperis. Plaintiff has not completed the application in full. In particular, plaintiff has not

set forth the date of his last employment and the “amount of gross and net salary and

wages per month” received, the amount of his monthly expenses, or the amount of his

debts. In addition, plaintiff states, in his application, that the instant complaint raises claims

that have been presented in other lawsuits, but plaintiff fails to list the case names and

numbers of the prior lawsuits or the court in which they were filed.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, without

prejudice. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with his complaint, plaintiff must, no later than

August 31, 2005, file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis that addresses

the deficiencies noted above, or pay the filing fee to the Clerk of the Court. If, by
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

August 31, 2005, plaintiff has not submitted an amended application to proceed in forma

pauperis, or paid the filing fee, the Court will dismiss plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 10, 2005 MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge