Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01884/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01884-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Paul Wesley Daly,

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al. 

 Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-1884-PHX-MHM

ORDER

Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

on October 2, 2007. On February 7, 2008, Respondents filed their response to Petitioner’s

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus arguing that Petitioner’s action for habeas relief was not

timely filed. On March 14, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and

Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied and dismissed with preudice. 

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they

had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within

which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has

long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge. The petition is untimely and barred by the statute of limitations. 

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

as the order of this Court [11].

Case 2:07-cv-01884-MHM Document 14 Filed 06/06/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied

and dismissed with prejudice [1]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitoner’s Motion for Certificate of Appealability

[doc. 12] is hereby construed as a Notice of Appeal. The Clerk shall proceed with

processing. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Status of Case is denied as

moot [13]. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 4th day of June, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-01884-MHM Document 14 Filed 06/06/08 Page 2 of 2