Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00349/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00349-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN 

WHICH PLAINTIFFS MAY RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’

COUNTERCLAIMS - Case No. 07-CV-00349 LJO (SMS)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

David J. Miclean (CSB# 115098/miclean@fr.com)

Katherine D. Prescott (CSB# 215496/prescott@fr.com)

Enrique D. Duarte (CSB# 247523/duarte@fr.com)

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

500 Arguello St., Suite 500 

Redwood City, CA 94063 

Tel: (650) 839-5070 

Fax: (650) 839-5071 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

CARGILL INCORPORATED and CAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(FRESNO DIVISION) 

CARGILL INCORPORATED and CAN 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MATTHEW BUDINE; DOUGLAS W. 

DEGROFF; DIVERSIFIED DAIRY 

SOLUTIONS, LLC; LUCIANA JONKMAN; 

PROGRESSIVE DAIRY SOLUTIONS, 

INC.; TODD SCHWEGEL; BRIAN 

SUNDBERG, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 07-CV-00349 LJO (SMS) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH 

PLAINTIFFS CARGILL 

INCORPORATED AND CAN 

TECHNOLOGIES MAY RESPOND TO 

DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIMS 

TO THE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs, CARGILL 

INCORPORATED and CAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants, 

PROGRESSIVE DAIRY SOLUTIONS, INC., MATTHEW BUDINE, LUCIANA JONKMAN, and 

BRIAN SUNDBERG (“Defendants”), that Plaintiffs be granted an additional thirty (30) days in 

which to respond to Defendants’ Counterclaims. 

Based on this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order, the date by which Plaintiffs must respond to 

Defendants’ Counterclaims shall be extended to June 6, 2007. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00349-LJO-SMS Document 71 Filed 05/10/07 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN 

WHICH PLAINTIFFS MAY RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ 

COUNTERCLAIMS - Case No. 07-CV-00349 LJO (SMS)

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This Stipulation is not entered into for purposes of delay, and will not alter the date of any 

event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. By entering into this stipulation, neither 

Plaintiffs nor Defendants waive any rights, claims or defenses they may have in this action. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 

Dated: May 10, 2007 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

By: /s/ David J. Miclean 

David J. Miclean 

Katherine D. Prescott 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

CARGILL INCORPORATED and CAN 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Dated: May 10, 2007 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Christopher T. Holland 

(as authorized on May 8, 2007) 

Kenneth E. Keller 

Christopher T. Holland 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MATTHEW BUDINE; LUCIANA 

JONKMAN; PROGRESSIVE DAIRY 

SOLUTIONS, INC.; and BRIAN SUNDBERG 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 5/9/2007 

 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

Honorable Sandra M. Snyder 

United States Magistrate Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:07-cv-00349-LJO-SMS Document 71 Filed 05/10/07 Page 2 of 2