Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00116/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00116-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY M. CALLISON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON; CITY 

OF VALLEJO; COUNTY OF NAPA; 

OFFICER BRETT SCHNEIDER; and 

CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL 

GROUP,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-0116 WBS DB

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On December 2, 2016, defendants filed a motion to compel plaintiff’s deposition and 

noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on December 23, 2016, in compliance with 

Local Rule 302(c)(1). Defendants’ motion alleges that plaintiff has repeatedly failed to appear for 

noticed depositions and seeks an order compelling plaintiff to appear for a deposition and to pay 

$4,674.05 in sanctions. (ECF No. 28 at 1.) Pursuant to Local Rule 251(e), plaintiff’s counsel was 

to file a response to defendants’ motion on or before December 16, 2016. Plaintiff’s counsel, 

however, has failed to file a timely response to defendants’ motion. 

////

////

////

Case 2:15-cv-00116-WBS-DB Document 32 Filed 12/20/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1) The December 23, 2016 hearing of defendants’ motion to compel (ECF No. 27) is 

vacated; and

2) Within seven (7) days of the date of this order, plaintiff’s counsel shall show cause in 

writing as to why defendants’ motion should not be granted, as well as good cause for failing to 

file a timely response to defendants’ motion. 

Dated: December 19, 2016

DLB:6

DB\orders\orders.civil\callison0116.osc

Case 2:15-cv-00116-WBS-DB Document 32 Filed 12/20/16 Page 2 of 2