Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_95-cv-01500/USCOURTS-caed-2_95-cv-01500-38/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GERALD F. STANLEY,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-95-1500 FCD GGH P

vs.

EDDIE YLST, Acting DEATH PENALTY CASE

Warden of the California State Prison

at San Quentin,

Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND FINAL SCHEDULING

 / ORDER

On August 3, 2006, petitioner’s motion to expand the record was heard before the

undersigned. For the reasons set forth on the record, and/or for reasons previously determined

by order, the following was decided:

1. Dr. Victoroff’s declaration was accepted, along with the rebuttal by Dr. Reus,

see Order of July 26, 2006;

2. Attorney Blake: The record will be expanded to accept Blake’s declaration as

his direct testimony; respondent will be permitted to subpoena Blake for cross-examination;

however, such cross-examination shall be presented to the undersigned no later than October 15,

2006;

Case 2:95-cv-01500-JAM-CKD Document 751 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. The record is expanded to include the deposition of Edna Franich along with

Exhibit 1;

4. All requests to expand the record regarding the declaration of attorney Neil and

associated exhibits were denied with the exception of the newspaper articles detailing the cause

of death for attorney Neil;

The parties may file closing briefing in this case no later than October 31, 2006. 

In this respect, the parties may:

a. incorporate the briefing filed in connection with the 1999 summary

judgment proceedings;

b. make additions to that briefing or brief any matters not addressed in

that briefing;

c. make additional argument regarding issues taken up at the evidentiary

hearing in this case.

The briefing shall be filed simultaneously, i.e., there are no opening, opposition and reply briefs. 

Because the briefing is optional, and ample time has been given for such briefing, no requests for

extensions of time will be granted. At this point, it is important that the parties focus their efforts

on the significant issues. No brief shall exceed 100 pages.

DATED: 8/16/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

__________________________________

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

stan1500.brf

Case 2:95-cv-01500-JAM-CKD Document 751 Filed 08/16/06 Page 2 of 2