Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-mc-00106/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-mc-00106-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 870
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26:7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL

Assistant U. S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2760

Attorneys for Petitioners

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and R.O. DAVID PALMER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and

DAVID PALMER, Revenue Officer,

Internal Revenue Service,

Petitioners,

v.

LAWRENCE ING, JR., dba

DAVID LINN RESOURCES,

Respondent.

2:06-mc-00106-MCE-GGH

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

CIVIL CONTEMPT

Taxpayer: Lawrence Ing, Jr., dba

 David Linn Resources

Date: Thursday, March 29, 2007

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Gregory G. Hollows 

 (8 Floor, Crtrm. #24) th

Upon the petition of McGREGOR W. SCOTT, United States Attorney for the Eastern

District of California, and the Exhibit attached thereto, including the verification of Revenue

Officer DAVID PALMER, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the Respondent, LAWRENCE ING, JR., DBA DAVID LINN

RESOURCES, appear before United States Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows, in that

Magistrate Judge's courtroom in the United States Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento,

California, on Thursday, March 29, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., and that respondent show cause as

follows: 

1. Why respondent, LAWRENCE ING, JR., dba DAVID LINN RESOURCES, should

not be held in civil contempt of this Court for his failure to comply with the “Order Adopting

Case 2:06-mc-00106-MCE -GGH Document 15 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Findings and Recommendations and Enforcing I.R.S. Summons” filed on December 20, 2006

for I.R.S. Summons issued on March 15, 2006.

2. Why the respondent should not incarcerated and ordered to pay a daily fine until he

complies with the Order, and ordered to pay a compensatory fine to the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 7 calendar days after the filing of this Order,

the respondent shall file and serve a written response to the Petition re: Civil Contempt of

Order Filed December 20, 2006. Only those issues brought into controversy by the

responsive papers and supported by declaration will be considered at the hearing on this

Order, and any uncontested allegation in the Petition Re: Civil Contempt will be considered

admitted. 

Respondent is hereby notified that a failure to comply with this Order will subject

respondent to possible further sanctions for contempt of Court.

The Clerk shall forward copies of the Order to the Magistrate Judge, the respondent

and the United States Attorney.

It is SO ORDERED.

DATED: 2/21/07 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ing106.ord

Case 2:06-mc-00106-MCE -GGH Document 15 Filed 02/22/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case 2:06-mc-00106-MCE -GGH Document 15 Filed 02/22/07 Page 3 of 3