Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05442/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05442-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS A. SPITZER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TRISHA A. ALJOE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-05442-MEJ 

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY SCHEDULE

Re: Dkt. No. 72

On February 2, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File Third Amended 

Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Dkt. No. 72. As part of their motion, 

Plaintiffs also request a 90-day extension of the discovery deadline in this case. See Pls.’ Mot. at 

6:26-8:3. As Rule 15 does not provide a means by which to extend discovery, and Plaintiffs’

request does not comply with the undersigned’s Discovery Standing Order, Plaintiff’s motion is 

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the discovery deadline. Defendants’ Opposition need 

only address the motion as it relates to the proposed Third Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2015

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:13-cv-05442-MEJ Document 73 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 1