Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01496/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01496-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRYL POOLE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1496 LEW JFM P

vs.

Warden D.K. SISTO, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed July 25, 2007, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. By order filed September 13, 2007, plaintiff

was given an additional thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. That thirty day period

has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

court’s September 13, 2007 order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:07-cv-01496-LEW -JFM Document 6 Filed 11/01/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: October 31, 2007.

12

pool1496.fta

Case 2:07-cv-01496-LEW -JFM Document 6 Filed 11/01/07 Page 2 of 2