Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00836/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00836-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN DANIEL BLYMAN,

 Petitioner,

v.

WARDEN,

 Respondent.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00836-LJO-BAM HC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE 

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO 

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER

Doc. 21

RESPONSE DUE IN FIFTEEN DAYS

Petitioner Stephen Daniel Blyman is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of 

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 12, 2015, this Court granted Petitioner's 

motion for stay and abeyance, directing Petitioner to file a status report within sixty days of the 

order and to file status reports every ninety (90) days thereafter. Although more than ninety days 

have elapsed since his submission of a status report on April 1, 2015, Petitioner has failed to submit 

an updated status report.

The Court has discretion to impose any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or 

within the inherent power of the Court, including dismissal of an action, based on Plaintiff’s failure 

to comply with a court order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; Local Rule 110.

Case 1:14-cv-00836-DAD-SKO Document 23 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Petitioner shall file a 

written response to the Court, showing cause why this case should not be dismissed for 

Plaintiff's failure to obey the Court’s order filed February 12, 2015. Submission of the 

required status report shall be deemed compliance with this requirement.

2. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's address, along with a 

copy of the Court's February 12, 2015 order (Doc. 21).

3. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action 

without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 13, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00836-DAD-SKO Document 23 Filed 07/14/15 Page 2 of 2