Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_11-cv-01326/USCOURTS-casd-3_11-cv-01326-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 11cv1326

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARI OLSON,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 11 CV 1326 MMA (WMC)

vs. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION

TO REMAND

[Doc. No. 11]

DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS AS MOOT;

[Doc. No. 5]

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOOT;

[Doc. No. 8]

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

REMAND AS MOOT

[Doc. No. 9]

GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC and DOES 1

through 10, Inclusive,

Defendant.

Defendant GMAC Mortgage, LLC removed this matter from the Superior Court of the State

of California, County of San Diego and promptly thereafter filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Cari

Olson’s complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

[Doc. No. 5]. In response, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint and

a motion to remand to state court. [Doc. Nos. 8, 9.] On July 21, 2011, while the three

Case 3:11-cv-01326-MMA-WMC Document 12 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 11cv1326

aforementioned motions were pending, the parties filed a Joint Motion to remand this matter to state

court.

Upon due consideration, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the parties’ Joint

Motion and REMANDS this case to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San

Diego (case number 37-2009-00060848-CU-OR-NC). Each party shall bear its own fees and costs

in connection with this removal. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint [Doc. No.

5], Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint [Doc. No. 8], and Plaintiff’s

motion to remand [Doc. No. 9], are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is instructed to

terminate the case file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 21, 2011

Hon. Michael M. Anello

United States District Judge

Case 3:11-cv-01326-MMA-WMC Document 12 Filed 07/21/11 Page 2 of 2