Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00125/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-00125-27/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KYLE DEI ROSSI and MARK 

LINTHICUM, on behalf of themselves and 

those similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION,

Defendant.

No. 2:12-cv-00125

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 

PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO 

APPEAL 

By Order entered on April 28, 2015, this Court Granted in Part and Denied in Part 

Plaintiffs Kyle Dei Possi and Mark Linthicum’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Class Certification. 

(ECF No. 160). Defendant Whirlpool Corporation (“Defendants”) subsequently filed a Motion 

Requesting permission to appeal this Court’s ruling pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

23(f). (ECF No. 161.) Rule 23(f) states:

A court of appeals may permit an appeal from an order granting or 

denying class-action certification under this rule if a petition for 

permission to appeal is filed with the circuit clerk within 14 days 

after the order is entered. An appeal does not stay proceedings in 

the district court unless the district judge or the court of appeals so 

orders.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f) (emphasis added). Defendants filed this petition on May 19, 2015, twentyCase 2:12-cv-00125-TLN-CKD Document 162 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

one (21) days after this Court’s ruling. Accordingly, Defendant’s petition is untimely and is thus 

DENIED.

Dated: May 28, 2015

Case 2:12-cv-00125-TLN-CKD Document 162 Filed 05/29/15 Page 2 of 2