Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03645/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03645-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PAGE 1 OF 3

LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY

750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300

SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY

Clark Ovruchesky, Esq. (SBN: 301844)

co@colawcalifornia.com

750 B. Street, Suite 3300

San Diego, California 92101

Telephone: (619) 356-8960

Facsimile: (619) 330-7610

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Gloria A. Mestayer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Gloria A. Mestayer (“Plaintiff”), by 

and through her counsel of record, Clark Ovruchesky of the Law Office of Clark 

Ovruchesky, and Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (“Capital One”), by 

and through its counsel of record, Amy Borlund of Doll Amir & Eley LLP, hereby 

submit this Stipulation To Extend Plaintiff’s Time To Oppose Capital One’s 

Motion to Dismiss (“MTD”) Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), as 

follows:

GLORIA A. MESTAYER, Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), 

N.A. and EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC.

 Defendants.

Case No.: 15-cv-03645-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S

TIME TO OPPOSE DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

DATE: October 27, 2016

TIME: 1:30 p.m.

COURTROOM: 5

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN

Case 3:15-cv-03645-EMC Document 97 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PAGE 2 OF 3

LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY

750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300

SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS:

1. Plaintiff filed the TAC on July 20, 2016; 

2. Capital One filed a MTD Plaintiff’s TAC on September 9, 2016;

3. The MTD hearing is scheduled to occur on October 27, 2016;

4. Plaintiff’s current deadline to oppose Capital One’s MTD is 

September 23, 2016;

5. Plaintiff’s counsel respectfully requests additional time to oppose 

Capital One’s MTD to address Capital One’s “Metro 2” credit reporting 

arguments.

6. Capital One agreed to extend Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose Capital 

One’s MTD by one week—to September 30, 2016. 

7. This extension would only additionally alter the date of Capital One’s 

deadline to file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition, but the MTD heading would still 

be three weeks away from the modified deadline for Capital One to file a reply. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:

Plaintiff’s deadline to file an opposition to Capital One’s MTD is extended 

from September 23, 2016 to September 30, 2016, and Capital One’s deadline to 

file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition is extended from September 30, 2016 to 

October 7, 2016. 

Dated: September 21, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

 LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY

 By: /s/ Clark Ovruchesky 

 CLARK OVRUCHESKY, ESQ.

 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 3:15-cv-03645-EMC Document 97 Filed 09/22/16 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PAGE 3 OF 3

LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY

750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300

SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: September 21, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

 DOLL AMIR & ELEY LLP

 By: /s/ Amy Borlund

 AMY BORLUND, ESQ.

 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

 CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), INC.

SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 2(f)(4) of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and 

Procedures Manual, I hereby certify that the content of this document is acceptable 

to all defense counsels listed above, and that I have obtained their authorizations to 

affix their electronic signatures to this document. 

Dated: September 21, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY

 By: /s/ Clark Ovruchesky

Clark Ovruchesky 

 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff’s 

deadline to file an opposition to Capital One’s MTD is extended from September

23, 2016 to September 30, 2016, and Capital One’s deadline to file a reply to 

Plaintiff’s opposition is extended from September 30, 2016 to October 7, 2016.

Date: _______________________ ____________________________________

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9/22/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-03645-EMC Document 97 Filed 09/22/16 Page 3 of 4
PROOF OF SERVICE 

LAW OFFICE OF CLARK OVRUCHESKY

750 B. STREET, SUITE 3300

SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Mestayer v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al. 

Case No: No: 3:15-cv-03645-EMC

I, the undersigned, certify and declare that I am over the age of 18 years, 

employed in the County of San Diego, State of California, and not a party to the 

above-entitled cause. 

On September 21, 2016, I served a true copy of: 

• STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO OPPOSE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

[X] By ECF: On this date, I electronically filed the following document(s) 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which sent electronic 

notification of such filing to all other parties appearing on the docket sheet.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct (and that 

I am employed in or by the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose 

direction the service was made). 

Executed on September 21, 2016 in San Diego, CA.

 By: /s/ Clark Ovruchesky 

 CLARK OVRUCHESKY, ESQ.

 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 3:15-cv-03645-EMC Document 97 Filed 09/22/16 Page 4 of 4