Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01358/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01358-53/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1145 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Plaintiff Kathleen Ellis, who is represented by

separate counsel, joined only one of the motions for partial

summary judgment. (Docket No. 476.)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

JAMES P. DEFAZIO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

 HOLLISTER, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

NOS. CIV. 04-1358 WBS GGH

 05-0559 WBS GGH

 05-1726 WBS GGH

 CONSOLIDATED

ORDER

----oo0oo----

On April 24, 2009, plaintiffs in the above-captioned

action filed three motions: two motions for partial summary

judgment and one motion to remove plan trustees (collectively

“plaintiffs’ motions”).1 (Docket Nos. 474, 475, 477.) Then, on

April 30, 2009, defendants filed four motions: three motions for

partial summary judgment and one motion to strike (collectively

“defendants’ motions”). (Docket Nos. 483, 484, 489, 495.) 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 501 Filed 05/08/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff Kathleen Ellis and defendants thereafter sought

additional time to respond to the motions and requested that oral

argument on the motions be rescheduled accordingly. (Docket Nos.

496-500.)

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1) any opposition to plaintiffs’ or defendants’ motions

shall be filed no later than May 26, 2009;

2) any reply to the oppositions shall be filed no later

than June 8, 2009; and

3) the hearing on plaintiffs’ and defendants’ motions

is hereby rescheduled for 2:00 p.m. on June 22, 2009.

DATED: May 8, 2009

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 501 Filed 05/08/09 Page 2 of 2