Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02262/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-02262-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOWARD MAURICE HUDSON, JR.,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-2262 GEB KJM P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY MAIL JAIL,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed November 26, 2007, petitioner was ordered to file an affidavit in

support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days and was cautioned that

failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day

period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an

affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:07-cv-02262-GEB -KJM Document 4 Filed 02/01/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 1, 2008. 

huds2262.fff

Case 2:07-cv-02262-GEB -KJM Document 4 Filed 02/01/08 Page 2 of 2