Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05920/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-05920-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiff PAULA PIAZZA

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PAULA PIAZZA, individually and in her

capacity as conservator of RICHARD L.

PIAZZA; and DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION,

SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FLAMES COFFEE SHOP,

ROBERT L. ANTRACCOLI & RUTH L.

ANTRACCOLI; ELIAS TSIGARIS; GUS

TSIGARIS; PETE TSIGARIS, individuals

dba FLAMES COFFEE SHOP,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C06-5920 PJH

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Release and Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) herein, each party is to bear its own costs and

attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over

enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994)

(empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements).

///

///

Case 4:06-cv-05920-PJH Document 20 Filed 08/10/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON -2-

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through

their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: August 9, 2007 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Jennifer L. Steneberg 

Jennifer L. Steneberg 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs PAULA PIAZZA and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION,

SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP OTHERS

Dated: July 23, 2007 McNICHOLS RANDICK O’DEA & TOOLIATOS

By: /s/ Brian M. O’Dea 

Brian M. O’Dea

Attorneys for Defendants ROBERT L. ANTRACCOLI &

RUTH L. ANTRACCOLI

Dated: July 26, 2007 CLAPP MORONEY BELLAGAMBA VUCINICH

By: /s/ Gregory C. Simonian 

Gregory C. Simonian

Attorneys for Defendants ELIAS TSIGARIS; GUS

TSIGARIS; PETE TSIGARIS

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 4:06-cv-05920-PJH Document 20 Filed 08/10/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON -3-

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Release and Settlement Agreement should such enforcement

be necessary.

Dated: ________________, 2007 _________________________________________

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

August 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-05920-PJH Document 20 Filed 08/10/07 Page 3 of 3