Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01065/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01065-59/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL D. HARRISON, 

Plaintiff,

v.

T. MOORE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:08-cv-01065-AWI-MJS (PC)

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

FIVE DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

PRETRIAL STATEMENT

(ECF No. 306)

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant 

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Jones, Moore, Burns, 

Dava, Kim, Edmonds, Galvan, C. Gonzalez, M. Gonzalez, Johnson, O’Neal, Parsons, 

Raygoza, Roth, Tumayo, Urbano, Vicente, Zakari, Bastianon, Campos, Casio, Cisneros, 

and Coronado for violating Plaintiff’s rights under the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 160.)

On March 22, 2016, the Court issued a Second Scheduling Order setting this 

case for a telephonic pretrial confirmation hearing on August 3, 2016 and setting a jury 

trial for October 12, 2016. (ECF No. 292.) Under this order, Plaintiff was required to 

submit his pretrial statement to the Court on or before June 8, 2016, and Defendants 

were required to submit their pretrial statement on or before July 6, 2016. Id. Plaintiff’s 

pretrial statement was filed on April 18, 2016. (ECF No. 299.)

Case 1:08-cv-01065-AWI-HBK Document 307 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On April 7, 2016, the Court issued an order setting a mandatory settlement 

conference for July 6, 2016. (ECF No. 297.) On July 5, 2016, Defendants filed the 

instant motion requesting a five day extension of time to file their pretrial statement, 

citing their belief that the July 6, 2016 settlement conference would potentially resolve 

this case or, at a minimum, help narrow the scope of this litigation. (ECF No. 306.)

Good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Defendants’ motion 

for a five day extension of time is GRANTED. Defendants will be required to submit their 

pretrial statement to the Court within five (5) days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 6, 2016 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-01065-AWI-HBK Document 307 Filed 07/06/16 Page 2 of 2