Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01225/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01225-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

* E-filed 11/5/07 *

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

3M COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAURICE KANBAR, MK ENTERPRISES,

INC., ROLLIT, LLC, AND REX PRODUCTS,

INC.,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CV 06-01225 HRL

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DOCUMENTS SHOULD NOT BE MADE

PART OF THE PUBLIC RECORD

Re: Docket No. 250

Plaintiff filed an administrative motion to file certain documents under seal. The basis

for the motion was Defendants' designation of those documents as confidential. Defendants are

required under Civil Local Rule 79-5 to file with the court and serve a narrowly tailored

declaration establishing that the designated information is sealable or to withdraw the

designation of confidentiality. No such declaration was filed by Defendants. 

The documents at issue here are: 

• The unredacted version of 3M's Motion to Compel (Docket No. 253).

• Exhibits 1 and 14 to the Adkisson Declaration in Support of 3M's Motion to

Compel (Docket No. 254).

//

//

JW (HRL)

Case 5:06-cv-01225-JW Document 381 Filed 11/05/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants are directed to submit by November 9, 2007 either 1) the requisite

declarations showing why the documents (or portions thereof) should be filed under seal, or 2) a

statement of non-opposition to the documents being made part of the public record. 

If court does not receive the necessary declaration on that date, these documents will be

made part of the public record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 11/5/07 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:06-cv-01225-JW Document 381 Filed 11/05/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

THIS SHALL CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS ORDER WILL BE SENT TO:

John Cameron Adkisson jca@fr.com, mla@fr.com 

Juanita R. Brooks brooks@fr.com, njohnson@fr.com 

Ann N. Cathcart Chaplin cathcartchaplin@fr.com, lindstedt@fr.com 

Robert Reeves Cross rcross@sideman.com, jcuago@sideman.com,

ldinglasan@sideman.com, mthomas@sideman.com 

Michael L. Gannon mgannon@mmm.com 

Michelle Lee Landry mlandry@kanbar.com 

Joel D. Leviton leviton@fr.com, lindner@fr.com 

David James Miclean miclean@fr.com, arceo@fr.com 

Kevin H. Rhodes krhodes@mmm.com 

Constance Jiun-Yee Yu cyu@sideman.com 

* Counsel are responsible for providing copies of this order to co-counsel.

Dated: 11/5/2007 

 /s/ KRO 

 Chambers of Magistrate Judge Lloyd

Case 5:06-cv-01225-JW Document 381 Filed 11/05/07 Page 3 of 3