Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01750/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01750-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT R. MACKAY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1750 WBS DAD P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed November 8, 2005, plaintiff was ordered to pay the required

filing fee of $250.00 or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis

within thirty days. In addition, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a civil rights complaint

that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would

result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired,

and plaintiff has not paid the appropriate filing fee, has not filed a completed application to

proceed in forma pauperis, has not filed a civil rights complaint, and has not otherwise responded

to the court’s order. 

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110 (E.D. Cal. 1997); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Case 2:05-cv-01750-WBS-DAD Document 4 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 20, 2005.

DAD:lg

mack1750.fifp

Case 2:05-cv-01750-WBS-DAD Document 4 Filed 12/20/05 Page 2 of 2