Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-00222/USCOURTS-cand-4_09-cv-00222-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C-09-0222-CW 

MEREDITH N. LANDY (S.B. #136489)

PETER T. SNOW (S.B. #222117) 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

2765 Sand Hill Road 

Menlo Park, California 94025-7019 

Telephone: (650) 473-2600 

Facsimile: (650) 473-2601 

Email: mlandy@omm.com 

 psnow@omm.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Rackable Systems, Inc., 

Thomas K. Barton, Madhu Ranganathan and Todd 

R. Ford 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

IN RE RACKABLE SYSTEMS, INC.

SECURITIES LITIGATION 

 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C-09-0222-CW 

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING SCHEDULING 

MATTERS 

Case 4:09-cv-00222-CW Document 52 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C-09-0222-CW 

WHEREAS, on February 3, 2010, Lead Plaintiffs filed the Second Amended Complaint 

for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (“Second Amended Complaint”); 

WHEREAS, on December 28, 2009, the Court entered an order setting the briefing 

schedule for Defendants’ response to the Second Amended Complaint, which is currently due on 

February 24, 2010; 

WHEREAS, Defendants intend to file a motion to dismiss the Second Amended 

Complaint; 

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding modifying the briefing schedule 

for Defendants’ motion to dismiss; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate and agree, and respectfully 

request that the Court enter an order, as follows: 

1. Defendants shall file their motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on 

or before April 2, 2010; 

2. Lead Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss on or 

before April 30, 2010; 

3. Defendants shall file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss on or before 

May 14, 2010; 

4. The hearing on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be on June 3, 2010 at 2:00 

pm. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 

Dated: February 23, 2010 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Meredith N. Landy 

Attorneys for Defendants Rackable Systems, 

Inc., Thomas K. Barton, Madhu Ranganathan 

and Todd R. Ford 

Case 4:09-cv-00222-CW Document 52 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. C-09-0222-CW 

 

Dated: February 23, 2010 

GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Lionel Z. Glancy 

Michael Goldberg 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs 

I, Meredith N. Landy, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Scheduling Matters. In compliance with General 

Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Lionel Z. Glancy has concurred in this filing. 

By: /s/ ________________________ 

 Meredith N. Landy 

O R D E R

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: __2/23/2010 

 The Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 United States District Judge 

 

MP1:1190198.1 

Case 4:09-cv-00222-CW Document 52 Filed 02/23/10 Page 3 of 3