Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00869/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-00869-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO INCREASE PAGE LIMITS FOR 

BRIEFING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

CASE NO. C-08-00869 JW (HRL)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Daniel M. Wall (Bar No. 102580) 

Timothy L. O’Mara (Bar No. 212731) 

Sadik Huseny (Bar No. 224659) 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111-6538 

Telephone: (415) 391-0600 

Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 

Email: Dan.Wall@lw.com

Email: Tim.OMara@lw.com

Email: Sadik.Huseny@lw.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

ATMI, INC. and ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 

MATERIALS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

PRAXAIR, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ATMI, INC. and ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY MATERIALS, INC., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 08-00869 JW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO INCREASE PAGE LIMITS FOR 

BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

Case 5:08-cv-00869-JW Document 42 Filed 03/28/08 Page 1 of 3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 1

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO INCREASE PAGE LIMITS FOR 

BRIEFING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

CASE NO. C-08-00869 JW (HRL)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend by five (5) pages the page limits 

for the opposition and reply briefing related to plaintiff Praxair, Inc.’s Motion for Preliminary 

due to the complexity and depth of procedural and factual issues presented, and request that the 

Court grant the page limit increases; 

NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, the parties STIPULATE 

that defendants shall be permitted to file an opposition brief of thirty (30) pages, and plaintiff 

shall be permitted to file a reply brief of twenty (20) pages. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 

Dated: March 19, 2008 Respectfully Submitted, 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

 Daniel M. Wall 

 Timothy L. O’Mara 

 Sadik Huseny 

By /s/ Timothy L. O’Mara 

Timothy L. O’Mara 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ATMI, INC. and ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY MATERIALS, INC. 

Dated: March 19, 2008 Respectfully Submitted, 

 HELLER EHRMAN LLP

 Stephen V. Bomse 

 

By /s/ Stephen V. Bomse 

Stephen V. Bomse 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PRAXAIR, INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _____________________ By:_______________________________________ 

THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE 

United States District Judge 

March 28, 2008

Case 5:08-cv-00869-JW Document 42 Filed 03/28/08 Page 2 of 3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 2

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO INCREASE PAGE LIMITS FOR 

BRIEFING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

CASE NO. C-08-00869 JW (HRL)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION

(General Order No. 45(X)(B)) 

 I, Timothy L. O’Mara, am the ECF User whose identification and password are 

being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO INCREASE PAGE 

LIMITS FOR BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2. In compliance with General Order No. 45 (X)(B), I 

hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Stephen 

V. Bomse. 

Dated: March 19, 2008 Respectfully submitted, 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

 Daniel M. Wall 

 Timothy L. O’Mara 

 Sadik Huseny 

By /s/ Timothy L.O’Mara 

 Timothy L. O’Mara 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ATMI, INC. and ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY MATERIALS, INC. 

 SF\648608.1 

Case 5:08-cv-00869-JW Document 42 Filed 03/28/08 Page 3 of 3