Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00792/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00792-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD HOMEM, ET AL,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

 INTEC CORPORATION, ET AL,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

Case No. 05-00792 MMC (JCS)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE

WITH DEPOSITION [Docket No. 173]

AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS [Docket No. 177]

On August 14, 2006, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition

Notices (the “Motion to Compel”) and a Motion for Sanctions Under FRCP 37 (the “Motion for

Sanctions”).

On August 31, 2006, both Motions came on for a telephonic hearing. Kenneth Absalom,

counsel for Plaintiffs, appeared. Adrienne Stover, counsel for Defendants, appeared.

For reasons stated on the record, and good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Compel is GRANTED. The deposition of

John Smith shall be taken on September 23, 2006, and the deposition of Timothy Flynn shall be

taken on September 25, 2006. The depositions shall be taken in North Carolina. The scope of the

depositions is limited to the successorship issue. The maximum length of each deposition shall be

for one (1) day of seven (7) hours. The Motion for Sanctions is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 1, 2006 _______________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00792-MMC Document 189 Filed 09/01/06 Page 1 of 1