Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01171/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-01171-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1171 LKK DAD P

vs.

DEPAK MEHTA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On March 17, 2011, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed March 3, 2011, denying him appointment of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local

Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to

law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate

judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed March 3, 2011, is affirmed. 

DATED: March 28, 2011.

Case 2:10-cv-01171-KJM-DAD Document 24 Filed 03/28/11 Page 1 of 1