Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00415/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00415-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCIA ELLEN BUNNEY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

RON KENAN, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-CV-00415 OWW LJO HC

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT PETITION

[Doc. #5]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is represented in this action by Michael Satris, Esq.

On January 9, 2005, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the United States

District Court for the Northern District of California. On February 27, 2006, the matter was

transferred to the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California. Following a preliminary

review of the petition, on May 11, 2006, Respondent was ordered to respond to the petition. At this

time, Respondent has not yet filed a response. On July 27, 2006, Petitioner filed a motion to

supplement the petition. Specifically, Petitioner seeks to include the most recent denial of parole by

the Board of Prison Hearings which occurred on July 28, 2005. Petitioner states she has fully

exhausted her claims with respect to the most recent denial of parole.

Following a stay of the petition, Petitioner filed an amended petition on June 15, 2005. On 

Case 1:06-cv-00415-OWW -GSA Document 7 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in relevant part:

(a) Supplemental Pleadings. Upon motion of a party the court may, upon reasonable notice

and upon such terms as are just, permit the party to serve a supplemental pleading setting

forth transactions or occurrences or events which have happened since the date of the

pleading sought to be supplemented. Permission may be granted even though the original

pleading is defective in its statement of a claim for relief or defense. If the court deems it

advisable that the adverse party plead to the supplemental pleading, it shall so order,

specifying the time therefor.

Good cause having been presented and good cause appearing therefor, Petitioner’s motion to

file and serve her supplemental pleading is GRANTED. Respondent is DIRECTED to address

Petitioner’s supplement within the response. In light of the supplement, the deadline for filing a

response is hereby extended to and including September 29, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 16, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00415-OWW -GSA Document 7 Filed 08/17/06 Page 2 of 2