Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05463/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05463-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Trademark Infringement

---

Settlement Notice, Dismissal Request Case No. 3:14-cv-05463-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ComputerLaw Group LLP

www.computerlaw.comsm

Jack Russo (Cal. Bar No. 96068) 

Christopher Sargent (Cal. Bar No. 246285)

COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP

401 Florence Street

Palo Alto, CA 94301

(650) 327-9800

(650) 618-1863 fax

jrusso@computerlaw.com

csargent@computerlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RiskIQ, Inc., a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff;

v.

Risk IO, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Defendant.

Case No. 3:14-cv-05463-HSG

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR 

DISMISSAL SUBJECT TO CONTINUING 

ENFORCEMENT JURISDICTION

FED.R.CIV.P. RULE 41(A)(2) AND RULE 65

Case 4:14-cv-05463-HSG Document 14 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 2
Settlement Notice, Dismissal Request 1 Case No. 3:14-cv-05463-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Computerlaw Group LLP

www.computerlaw.comsm

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

SUBJECT TO CONTINUING ENFORCEMENT JURISDICTION

Plaintiff RiskIQ, Inc. and Defendant Risk IO, Inc. have agreed to resolve and settle this 

Action by mutual agreement and entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement effective 

March 9, 2015.

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, RiskIQ 

respectfully requests that the Court dismiss the above-captioned action with prejudice, and 

RiskIQ further respectfully requests that the Court retain jurisdiction over the Confidential 

Settlement Agreement signed between the parties, and all matters arising out of the Confidential 

Settlement Agreement, including enforcement of its terms under Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure if required.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: March 20, 2015 COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP

By: /s/ Christopher Sargent

Jack Russo

Christopher Sargent

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

RISKIQ, INC.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

For good cause shown, the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. 

This Dismissal shall not extinguish the Parties rights and obligations under the March 9, 

2015 Confidential Settlement Agreement, and the Court expressly reserves and retains 

jurisdiction over the parties’ Confidential Settlement Agreement, and all matters arising out of 

the Confidential Settlement Agreement, including enforcement of its terms.

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 3/20/2015

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Judge of the United States District Court

Case 4:14-cv-05463-HSG Document 14 Filed 03/20/15 Page 2 of 2