Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00826/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-00826-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

SIL IC O N VALL EY 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AT T O R N EYS AT LAW 

DOUGLAS E. LUMISH (Bar No. 183863)

doug.lumish@lw.com

GABRIEL S. GROSS (Bar No. 254672)

gabe.gross@lw.com

PATRICIA YOUNG (Bar No. 291265)

patricia.young@lw.com

LINFONG TZENG (Bar No. 281798)

linfong.tzeng@lw.com

JIE WANG (Bar No. 306395)

jie.wang@lw.com

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

140 Scott Drive

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: +1.650.328.4600

Facsimile: +1.650.463.2600

Attorneys for Plaintiff CODEXIS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CODEXIS, INC.

Plaintiff, 

v.

ENZYMEWORKS, INC., a California 

corporation, ENZYMEWORKS, INC., a 

Chinese corporation a/k/a SUZHOU 

HANMEI BIOTECHNOLOGY CO. LTD 

d/b/a ENZYMEWORKS, INC. (CHINA),

JUNHUA TAO, an individual, and 

ANDREW TAO, an individual

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00826-WHO

CONSENT JUDGMENT OF PATENT 

INFRINGEMENT

The parties having agreed to a settlement of the claims between them, and having 

stipulated to entry of this Consent Judgment, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND 

DECREED that:

CONSENT JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00826-WHO

Case 3:16-cv-00826-WHO Document 186 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 3
SIL IC O N VALL EY 

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the above-captioned action 

and personal jurisdiction over the parties, and venue is proper in this District. This Court retains 

jurisdiction for the purpose of executing and enforcing the terms of this ConsentJudgment.

2. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Codexis, Inc. (“Codexis”) against 

Defendants EnzymeWorks, Inc. (U.S.) and Suzhou Hanmei Biotechnology Co. Ltd, d/b/a 

EnzymeWorks, Inc. (China) (collectively, “EnzymeWorks”) (collectively, the “Corporate 

Defendants”) on Counts I through X of the Second Amended Complaint in the above-captioned 

action as follows:

a. EnzymeWorks has infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 8,088,610; 8,415,127; 

7,820,421; 8,071,347; 8,227,229; 8,293,507; 8,470,564; 8,852,900; 8,932,838; and 

9,133,445 (the “Patent-in-Suit”).

b. The Patents-in-Suit are not invalid.

3. This Consent Judgment is final, enforceable, and non-appealable.

4. Each party will bear its own fees, costs, and expenses.

CONSENT JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00826-WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AT T O R N EYS AT LAW 

Case 3:16-cv-00826-WHO Document 186 Filed 02/06/18 Page 2 of 3
SIL IC O N VALL EY 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AT T O R N EYS AT LAW 

Dated: February 5, 2018 Respectfully submitted,

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

By /s/ Gabriel S. Gross

Douglas E. Lumish 

Gabriel S. Gross 

Patricia Young 

Linfong Tzeng

Jie Wang

Attorneys for Plaintiff CODEXIS, INC.

Dated: February 5, 2018 Respectfully submitted,

By /s/ J. James Li

J. James Li 

Tony Abdollahi 

Andy Pierz

Attorneys for Defendants JUNHUA TAO, 

ANDREW TAO, ENZYMEWORKS, INC., 

and ENZYMEWORKS, INC. (CHINA) a/k/a 

SUZHOU HANMEI BIOTECHNOLOGY CO. 

LTD dba ENZYMEWORKS, INC. (CHINA)

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from the other signatory.

Dated: February 5, 2018

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By /s/ Gabriel S. Gross

Gabriel S. Gross

ORDER

Dated: February 6, 2018

THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Court Judge

CONSENT JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00826-WHO

Case 3:16-cv-00826-WHO Document 186 Filed 02/06/18 Page 3 of 3