Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_09-cv-00653/USCOURTS-azd-4_09-cv-00653-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joshua Harrison Kitts, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles Ryan et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 09-653-TUC-RCC

ORDER

On June 29, 2010, the Honorable Charles R. Pyle, United States Magistrate Judge,

filed a Report and Recommendation ("Recommendation") in this action. (Doc. 13). The

Recommendation advised the Court to DENY the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a

Person in State Custody pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1). Petitioner lodged his

objections within the fourteen day period allowed under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (Doc. 14), and

Respondents file their Response to Petitioner’s Objection to Report and Recommendation

(Doc. 16) but lodged no objections.

Petitioner’s objection to the Recommendation is a generalized objection to his

conditions of confinement as they relate to his access to legal materials. He claims that this

limited access prevented him from litigating his case adequately. This is not a proper

objection to the contents of the Recommendation, and Petitioner cannot raise this claim at

this juncture. Badea v. Cox, 931 F.2d 573, 574 (9th Cir. 1991); Johnson v. Schiro, 401

Case 4:09-cv-00653-RCC Document 17 Filed 10/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

F.Supp.2d 1013, 1020 (D.Ariz. 2005).

The Court considers the Recommendation (Doc. 13) to be thorough and wellreasoned. After a thorough and de novo review of the record, the Court will ADOPT the

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Pyle. Therefore 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Pyle’s Report

and Recommendation. (Doc. 13). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition is DENIED. 

DATED this 18th day of October, 2010.

Case 4:09-cv-00653-RCC Document 17 Filed 10/19/10 Page 2 of 2