Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04262/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-04262-43/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIGUEL CASTANEDA, KATHERINE

CORBETT, and JOSEPH WELLNER, on

behalf of themselves and others similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

BURGER KING CORPORATION,

Defendant. /

No. C 08-04262 WHA

ORDER RE PARTIES’

MOTION TO REVISE EXISTING

SCHEDULING ORDERS

If the Court receives a fully executed and final version of a stipulation of settlement in

this matter on or before March 4, 2010, the Court will consider whether to use the hearing on

the parties’ respective motions for partial summary judgment now set for March 18 to instead

consider a joint motion for preliminary approval of the settlement agreement. Meanwhile, the

hearing on the motions for partial summary judgment will remain on calendar as previously

scheduled. The parties’ motion to revise the existing scheduling order based on their averment

that they have “agreed in principle” to a settlement is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-04262-WHA Document 320 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 1