Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01495/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01495-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK A. GRANT,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MICHAEL CORRAL, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:19-cv-01495-MCE-CKD PS

ORDER

On March 3, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 

were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 29. No objections were filed. 

 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 

1983). 

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 3, 2020 (ECF No. 29), are 

ADOPTED in full; and 

Case 2:19-cv-01495-MCE-CKD Document 40 Filed 03/25/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

2. Plaintiff’s motion to strike (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED IN PART and affirmative

defense nine (Arrest/Force) is STRICKEN without prejudice; and DENIED IN PART without 

prejudice as to the remainder of plaintiff’s motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 24, 2020 

Case 2:19-cv-01495-MCE-CKD Document 40 Filed 03/25/20 Page 2 of 2