Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01746/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01746-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL MCNEIL,

Plaintiff,

v.

LVN HAYES, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01746-AWI-SKO PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL, DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AS MOOT, DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, AND

REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE

ANSWER WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS

(Docs. 27, 39, 41, and 42)

Plaintiff Michael McNeil, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 23, 2010. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 29, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein

which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. No objections were filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on November 29, 2012, is adopted in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s motion to defer consideration of Defendant Soto’s motion to dismiss, filed

on August 23, 2012, is DENIED as moot;

///

1

Case 1:10-cv-01746-AWI-SKO Document 45 Filed 02/04/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. Defendant Soto’s motion to dismiss, filed on June 28, 2012, and in which Defendant

Byers joined on August 13, 2012, is DENIED; and 

4. Defendants Soto, Byers, and Raman shall file an answer the second amended

complaint within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 2, 2013 

0m8i78 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:10-cv-01746-AWI-SKO Document 45 Filed 02/04/13 Page 2 of 2