Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01977/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01977-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 16:1538 Endangered Species Act

---

Order – Page 1 

Conservation Congress v. U.S., No. 2:13-cv-01977 JAM-KJN 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

CONSERVATION CONGRESS, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, and 

UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE 

SERVICE, 

 Defendants, 

 and 

TRINITY RIVER LUMBER COMPANY, 

 Defendant-Intervenor. 

______________________________________

 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-KJN 

 

 ORDER 

 

This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Status Report of February 12, 

2016. Document No. 77. Having considered the positions of the parties, the Court approves and 

adopts the modified briefing schedule for this matter proposed by Plaintiff and Federal 

Defendants in the February 12 Joint Status Report. The new briefing schedule shall be as 

follows: 

Federal Defendants and Defendant-Intervenor file their 

opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Regarding Scope 

of Review (ECF No. 76). 

March 21, 2016 

Plaintiff files its reply to its Motion for Order Regarding 

Scope of Review (ECF No. 76). 

March 28, 2016 

Case 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-DB Document 78 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 2
Order – Page 2 

Conservation Congress v. U.S., No. 2:13-cv-01977 JAM-KJN 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Regarding Scope of 

Review (ECF No. 76). 

April 5, 2016 or as otherwise 

ordered by the Court 

Plaintiff files its Motion for Summary Judgment. May 6, 2016 

Federal Defendants file their combined Opposition to 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion 

for Summary Judgment. 

June 10, 2016 

Defendant-Intervenor files its combined Opposition to 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion 

for Summary Judgment. 

June 17, 2016 

Plaintiff files its single combined Reply and Opposition to 

Federal Defendants’ and Defendant-Intervenor’s CrossMotions for Summary Judgment. 

July 1, 2016 

Federal Defendants file their Reply. July 15, 2016 

Defendant-Intervenor files its Reply. July 15, 2016 

Hearing on Cross-Motions August 23, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. 

DATED: 2/19/2016 

 /s/ John A. Mendez_____________ 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-DB Document 78 Filed 02/19/16 Page 2 of 2