Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-06141/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-06141-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.

---

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Case No. 15-cv-06141-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GENERAL EMPLOYEES TRUST FUND and 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF GENERAL 

EMPLOYEES TRUST FUND,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

DELTA WINDOW CLEANING COMPANY 

INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-06141-HSG

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

(PROPOSED) ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS

[ADR L.R. 3-5]

 The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process: 

 Court Processes:

 ❏ Arbitration ❏ ENE x Mediation

(Use space below to provide any information regarding timing of session, preferred subject matter 

expertise of neutral, or other issues.)

 Private Process:

 ❑ Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

WYLIE, McBRIDE, PLATTEN & RENNER 

Dated: March 8, 2016 By: /s/ Diane Sidd-Champion 

 DIANE SIDD-CHAMPION

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

WYLIE, McBRIDE, PLATTEN & RENNER

DIANE SIDD-CHAMPION, SBN 78140

605 Market Street, Suite 1200

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-0904

Facsimile: (415) 536-0906

E-mail: dsidd-champion@wmprlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

General Employees Trust Fund and 

Board of Trustees of General Employees Trust Fund

Case 4:15-cv-06141-HSG Document 19 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Case No. 15-cv-06141-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

SILICON VALLEY LAW GROUP

Dated: March 8, 2016 By: /s/ Edward A. Kraus

EDWARD A. KRAUS 

 Attorneys for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________ By: ________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 The parties shall hold the mediation by the presumptive 90-day deadline. 3/10/2016

Case 4:15-cv-06141-HSG Document 19 Filed 03/10/16 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Case No. 15-cv-06141-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

ECF ATTESTATION

I, Diane Sidd-Champion, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has 

been obtained from the other signatory to this document. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 8th day of March 2016 at San Francisco, California. 

By: /s/ Diane Sidd-Champion_______ 

DIANE SIDD-CHAMPION

Attorney for Plaintiffs

l:\0198\40094\stipulation to adr process.docx

Case 4:15-cv-06141-HSG Document 19 Filed 03/10/16 Page 3 of 3