Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00404/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00404-82/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERVICE EMPLOYEES

INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SAL ROSELLI, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-00404 WHA

ORDER RE POTENTIAL

RULE 50 MOTIONS

By the end of the plaintiffs’ case in chief and no later, plaintiffs must file a schedule

summarizing the evidence as to each defendant from whom damages are sought. This must be

broken down defendant-by-defendant, so that a Rule 50 ruling may be promptly made. 

The itemization should specify the testimony and/or exhibits with a pithy but accurate summary

of the item, taking care to state whether the defendant was mentioned specifically. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 29, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 580 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 1