Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00060/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00060-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAFAYETTE CADE, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:06-cv-00060-OWW-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 16)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

A COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH

RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED (Docs. 1

and 12)

ORDER THAT THIS DISMISSAL

COUNTS AS A STRIKE PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1915(G)

Plaintiff Lafayette Cade (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On December 21, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

Case 1:06-cv-00060-OWW -SMS Document 17 Filed 01/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

To date, plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 21,

2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for

plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s order of August 24, 2006,

and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted; and

3. This dismissal shall count as a strike pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00060-OWW -SMS Document 17 Filed 01/30/07 Page 2 of 2