Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04679/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04679-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

-1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SONNENSCHEIN 

NATH 

&

ROSENTHAL LLP 

525

MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708 

(415) 882-5000 

DANIEL J. HERLING 

herling@khlaw.com 

KELLER & HECKMAN LLP 

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 450 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

(415) 948-2800 

(415) 948-2808 (fax) 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

EDDY DOMINGUEZ, NEWTON BUI, 

TAN NGYUEN and LICINO VALINO 

IVOR SAMSON (SBN 052767) 

isamson@sonnenschein.com 

MARY KAY LACEY (SBN 142812) 

mlacey@sonnenschein.com 

SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP 

525 Market Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2708 

Telephone: (415) 882-5000 

Facsimile: (415) 882-0300 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ANDREW CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

EDDY DOMINGUEZ, NEWTON BUI, 

TAN NGYUEN and LICINO VALINO, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ANDREW CORPORATION, 

 Defendant. 

No. C 07-04679 CW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

[F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(ii)]

Case 4:07-cv-04679-CW Document 67 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 3
 -2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SONNENSCHEIN 

NATH 

&

ROSENTHAL LLP 

525

MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708 

(415) 882-5000 

Pursuant to the Court’s December 4, 2007 Order, the Court stayed plaintiffs’ first 

through seventh causes of action and referred these claims to binding arbitration. In addition, 

the Court severed the eighth and ninth causes of action from plaintiffs’ other claims and referred 

these claims to non-binding arbitration. 

Following the Court’s ruling, the parties engaged in settlement discussions which 

resulted in an agreement, effective February 15, 2008, to fully and completely settle all aspects 

of this matter. Accordingly, the parties hereby agree that this action, including each of cause of 

action referred to binding and non-binding arbitration, should be dismissed in its entirety with 

prejudice, with each party to bear his or its own costs and attorneys’ fees; and the parties 

respectfully request that the Court approve and give effect to this Stipulation by signing the 

Order below. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February 26, 2008 KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP 

 ___/S/ DANIEL J. HERLING_____ 

 DANIEL J. HERLING 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

EDDY DOMINGUEZ, NEWTON BUI, TAN 

NYUGEN and LICINO VALINO 

Dated: February 26, 2008 SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP 

 ___/S/ MARY KAY LACEY_______ 

 MARY KAY LACEY 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ANDREW CORPORATION 

 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 4:07-cv-04679-CW Document 67 Filed 03/13/08 Page 2 of 3
 -3- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SONNENSCHEIN 

NATH 

&

ROSENTHAL LLP 

525

MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708 

(415) 882-5000 

FILER’S ATTESTATION: 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its 

signatories. 

DATED: February 26, 2008 BY: ___/S/ MARY KAY LACEY_______ 

 MARY KAY LACEY 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________, 2008 BY: _______________________________ 

 HON. CLAUDIA WILKIN 

3/13

Case 4:07-cv-04679-CW Document 67 Filed 03/13/08 Page 3 of 3