Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02076/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02076-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Dimmler submitted the declaration on paper and failed to provide a chambers copy. 

Dimmler is referred to General Order No. 45, which provides that, with certain exceptions

not applicable to said declaration, all documents shall be electronically filed. Further,

Dimmler is referred to the following provision in the Court’s Standing Orders: “In all cases

that have been assigned to the Electronic Case Filing Program, the parties are required to

provide for use in chambers one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically. 

The paper copy of each such document shall be delivered no later than noon on the day

after the document is filed electronically. The paper copy shall be marked ‘Chambers

Copy’ and shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office in an envelope clearly marked with the

judge’s name, case number, and ‘E-Filing Chambers Copy.’”

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERKELEY HEARTLAB, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

BERKELEY HEART EUROPE A.S., et al.,

Defendants

 /

No. C-07-2076 MMC

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE

Before the Court is the Declaration of Alan I. White, filed May 17, 2007, submitted by

defendant Charles L. Dimmler III (“Dimmler”) in response to the Court’s order, filed May 3,

2007, directing Dimmler to show cause why the above-titled action should not be remanded

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1

//

Case 3:07-cv-02076-MMC Document 13 Filed 05/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In his declaration, counsel asserts that before the action was removed, Dimmler,

and well as other defendants, had filed motions in state court, such as a motion to stay the

instant action, and requests the Court rule on said motions. Counsel is referred to Civil

Local Rule 7-2(a), which sets forth that “all motions must be filed, served and noticed in

writing on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge for hearing not less than 35 days after

service of the motion.”

2

Having reviewed the Declaration of Alan I. White, the Court finds Dimmler has

sufficiently shown the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, and, accordingly,

DISCHARGES the order to show cause.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2007 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-02076-MMC Document 13 Filed 05/18/07 Page 2 of 2