Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-02945/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-02945-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 422
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Cause of Action: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL BRACCO, et al.,

Appellants,

 v.

KURT ALBERT LEINTZ, et al.,

Appellees.

 /

No. C 12-2945 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF

DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH

BANKRUPTCY LOCAL RULES, CIVIL

LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On December 27, 2012, Appellants filed their “Motion for One Week Extension of

Time to File Appellants’ Opening Brief.” On December 28, 2012, Appellees filed their

“Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Opening Brief.” 

Both parties have violated the Bankruptcy Local Rules of this District, the Civil Local Rules

of this District, and the Court’s standing orders, however, by failing “to provide for

chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers

Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2; see also Bank. L.R. 1001-2(a)(7) (incorporating Civil

Local Rule 5-1); Bankr. L.R. 1001-2(a)(13) (incorporating standing orders of judges). 

Both parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the

Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of the aboveCase 3:12-cv-02945-MMC Document 17 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

referenced documents. Both parties are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to

comply with the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each electronicallyfiled document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from

the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely

provided to the Court.

Dated: January 2, 2013 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:12-cv-02945-MMC Document 17 Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 2