Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00560/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00560-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

857497.2 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: AMENDING THE COMPLAINT 

William Bernstein (State Bar No. 065200) 

Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064) 

Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260) 

Dean M. Harvey (State Bar No. 250298) 

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP 

275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 

Telephone: (415) 956-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Stanislaus Food Products Co. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(FRESNO DIVISION) 

STANISLAUS FOOD PRODUCTS 

COMPANY, a California corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

USS-POSCO INDUSTRIES, a California 

business entity; and DOES 1-200, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 1:09-CV-00560-LJO-SMS 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 

AMENDING THE COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Stanislaus Food Products Company (“Stanislaus Food”) and Defendant USSPOSCO Industries (“UPI”) hereby stipulate and agree that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 15(a), Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint. 

UPI shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this Order in which to 

respond. 

Stanislaus Food shall have twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of UPI’s 

response in which to respond. 

UPI shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of Stanislaus Food’s response 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00560-LJO-BAM Document 114 Filed 02/25/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

857497.2 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: AMENDING THE COMPLAINT 

in which to reply. 

The Motion to Dismiss the original Complaint filed on January 29, 2010 is 

WITHDRAWN and the March 1, 2010 hearing on the motion is VACATED. 

SO STIPULATED AND AGREED: 

Dated: February 4, 2010 LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 

By: /s/ Eric B. Fastiff

Eric B. Fastiff 

William Bernstein (State Bar No. 065200) 

Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064) 

Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260) 

Dean M. Harvey (State Bar No. 250298) 

275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 

Telephone: (415) 956-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 

Counsel for Stanislaus Food Products Company 

Dated: February 4, 2010 STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS 

ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP 

By: /s/ Lucas E. Gilmore

Lucas E. Gilmore 

Allan Steyer (State Bar No. 100318) 

D. Scott Macrae (State Bar No. 104663) 

Lucas E. Gilmore (State Bar No. 250893) 

One California Street, Third Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421 3400 

Facsimile: (415) 421 2234 

Attorneys for Defendant USS-Posco Industries 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00560-LJO-BAM Document 114 Filed 02/25/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

857497.2 3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: AMENDING THE COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to Rule 15(a), Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint. Defendant 

USS-POSCO Industries shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this Order in 

which to respond. The Motion to Dismiss the original Complaint filed on January 29, 2010 is 

WITHDRAWN and the March 1, 2010 hearing on the motion is VACATED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 24, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder______ 

 The Honorable Sandra M. Snyder, 

U.S. Magistrate Judge

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00560-LJO-BAM Document 114 Filed 02/25/10 Page 3 of 3