Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01473/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-01473-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PAGE LIMITS IMPOSED ON ALL PARTIES’ PLEADINGS 

RELATED TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

2:21-CV-01473-KJM-JDP

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Danielle K. Lewis (SBN 218274)

dlewis@hpylaw.com

Miles F. Maurino. (SBN 319377)

mmaurino@hpylaw.com

HAWKINS PARNELL & YOUNG, LLP

33 New Montgomery, Suite 800

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 766-3200

Facsimile: (415) 766-3250

Attorneys for Defendants County of Solano, Solano 

County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff Thomas A. Ferrara, 

Dalton McCampbell, Lisa McDowell, Connor 

Hamilton, and Chris Carter

Gregory M. Fox (SBN 70876)

BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL

2749 Hyde Street

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: (415) 353-0999

Email: gfox@bfesf.com

Attorneys for Defendant Roy Stockton

Yasin M. Almadani (Cal. Bar No. 242798)

ALMADANI LAW

4695 MacArthur Ct., Suite 1100

Newport Beach, CA 92660

Tel: (949) 877-7177

Fax: (949) 877-8757

YMA@LawAlm.com 

Ahmed Ibrahim (Cal. Bar No. 238739)

AI LAW, PLC

4695 MacArthur Ct., Suite 1100

Newport Beach, CA 92660

Tel: (949) 266-1240

Fax: (949) 266-1280

aibrahim@ailawfirm.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

NAKIA V. PORTER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:21-CV-01473-KJM-JDP

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY 

THE PAGE LIMITS IMPOSED ON ALL 

PARTIES’ PLEADINGS RELATED TO

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, 

AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller

Chief United States District Judge

Plaintiffs Nakia Porter, on behalf of herself and her minor children, L.P. and A.P., Joe Berry 

Powell, Jr., and Clifton Powell, on behalf of his minor child O.P., (collectively “Plaintiffs”) by and 

through their counsel of record, Yasin M. Almadani and Ahmed Ibrahim, Defendants County of Solano, 

Solano County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff Thomas A. Ferrara, Dalton McCampbell, Lisa McDowell, 

Connor Hamilton, and Chris Carter (collectively “County Defendants”), by and through their counsel of 

Case 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP Document 130 Filed 07/03/24 Page 1 of 5
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PAGE LIMITS IMPOSED ON ALL PARTIES’ PLEADINGS 

RELATED TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

2:21-CV-01473-KJM-JDP

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

record, Danielle K. Lewis, and Defendant Roy Stockton, by and through his counsel of record, Gregory 

M. Fox, (collectively together “Defendants”) hereby stipulate to modify the page limits for all parties’ 

motion for summary judgment. 

The parties hereby stipulate that:

1. The operative Complaint is Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 15) 

2. The Second Amended Complaint consists of thirteen causes of action, 195 paragraphs, 

spans 49 pages in length, and alleges causes of action against seven separate defendants. In addition, 

there are five total Plaintiffs, which consist of two adults and three minors. 

3. Plaintiffs intend to file a motion for summary judgment/adjudication. Both County 

Defendants, as well as Defendant Roy Stockton, also intend to file separate motions for summary 

judgment/adjudication. The parties have begun to meet and confer regarding the issues to be addressed 

in the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment/adjudication. 

4. County Defendants are represented by Danielle K. Lewis and Miles Maurino of Hawkins 

Parnell & Young, LLP. Separately, Defendant Roy Stockton is represented by Greg Fox of Bertrand, 

Fox, Elliot, Osman & Wenzel. 

5. County Defendants and Defendant Roy Stockton intend to file separate motions for 

summary judgment, based on the disparate allegations made against the County Defendants, and 

Defendant Roy Stockton. 

6. On February 22, 2024, the Court issued an Order modifying case deadlines, which dictated 

that “All dispositive motions, except for motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other 

emergency applications, shall be filed by July 15, 2024. Oppositions shall be filed by August 12, 2024, 

and replies shall be filed by August 26, 2024.” (ECF No. 107)

7. The case is assigned to the Honorable Chief District Judge Kimberly Mueller, whose 

standing order which states that the “Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of or in 

opposition to motions shall not exceed twenty pages. Replies shall not exceed ten (10) pages. Only in 

rare instances and for good cause shown will the court grant an application to extend these page 

limitations. All requests for page limit increases must be made in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior 

Case 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP Document 130 Filed 07/03/24 Page 2 of 5
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PAGE LIMITS IMPOSED ON ALL PARTIES’ PLEADINGS 

RELATED TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

2:21-CV-01473-KJM-JDP 

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

to the filing of the motion.” (Hon. Judge Kimberly J. Mueller Civil Standing Order, Section 4(B)) 

8. Counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendants have met and conferred regarding a stipulation to 

increase the page limits. Both parties agree that an increase to page limits of all memorandum of points 

of authorities in support of a motion for summary judgment/adjudication, all oppositions, and all replies

warrant a modest increase to reflect the volume of allegations, causes of action, and parties. 

9. Specifically, the parties hereby stipulate to increase the page limit to any memorandum of 

points and authorities in support of a motion for summary judgment/adjudication from 20 pages to 30 

pages. 

10. The parties hereby stipulate to increase the page limit to any opposition to a motion for 

summary judgment/adjudication from 20 pages to 30 pages. 

11. The parties hereby stipulate to increase the page limits to any reply to an opposition to a 

motion for summary judgment/adjudication from 10 pages to 15 pages. 

12. This stipulation does not seek to modify any other case deadlines. 

13. No trial date has been set.

14. This stipulation is being filed in good faith and not for purposes of delay. 

15. The parties submit that the foregoing demonstrates good cause to grant the request in this 

Stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

Dated: June 27, 2024 ALMADANI LAW 

/s/ Yasin M. Almadani 

Yasin M. Almadani, Esq. 

Dated: June 27, 2024 AI LAW, PLC 

/s/ Ahmed Ibrahim 

Ahmed Ibrahim, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: June 27, 2024 HAWKINS PARNELL & YOUNG

Case 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP Document 130 Filed 07/03/24 Page 3 of 5
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PAGE LIMITS IMPOSED ON ALL PARTIES’ PLEADINGS 

RELATED TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

2:21-CV-01473-KJM-JDP 

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

/s/ Danielle K. Lewis

Danielle K. Lewis, Esq. 

Miles F. Maurino, Esq. 

Attorneys for Defendants County of Solano, Solano 

County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff Thomas A. Ferrara, 

Dalton McCampbell, Lisa McDowell, Connor 

Hamilton, and Chris Carter 

Dated: June 27, 2024 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL

/s/ Gregory M. Fox 

Gregory M. Fox, Esq. 

Attorneys for Defendant Roy Stockton

FILER'S ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have been authorized by counsel to show their signature on this document 

as /s/.

DATED: June 27, 2024

/s/ Danielle K. Lewis

DANIELLE K. LEWIS

Case 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP Document 130 Filed 07/03/24 Page 4 of 5
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PAGE LIMITS IMPOSED ON ALL PARTIES’ PLEADINGS 

RELATED TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

2:21-CV-01473-KJM-JDP 

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The foregoing stipulation of the parties is approved, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 

A memorandum of points and authorities in support of a motion for summary 

judgment/adjudication shall be 30 pages. 

An opposition to a motion for summary judgment/adjudication shall be 30 pages. 

A reply to an opposition to a motion for summary judgment/adjudication shall be 15 pages. 

DATED: July 3, 2024. 

Case 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP Document 130 Filed 07/03/24 Page 5 of 5