Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00977/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-00977-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR AMGEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. 3:19-cv-00977-RS 

pa-1895553 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ERIK J. OLSON (CA SBN 175815) 

EJOlson@mofo.com 

ERIC C. PAI (CA SBN 247604) 

EPai@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

755 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 

Telephone: (650) 813.5600 

Facsimile: (650) 494.0792 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANDOZ INC. 

Vernon M. Winters (SBN 130128) 

Sue Wang (SBN 286247) 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1503 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

vwinters@sidley.com 

Nicholas Groombridge (pro hac vice) 

Eric A. Stone (pro hac vice) 

Jennifer H. Wu (pro hac vice) 

PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & 

GARRISON LLP 

1285 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10019-6064 

Telephone: (212) 373-3000 

Facsimile: (212) 757-3990 

ngroombridge@paulweiss.com 

Wendy A. Whiteford (SBN 150283) 

Lois M. Kwasigroch (SBN 130159) 

AMGEN INC. 

One Amgen Center Drive 

Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789 

Telephone: (805) 447-1000 

Facsimile: (805) 447-1010 

wendy@amgen.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

AMGEN INC. and AMGEN 

MANUFACTURING, LIMITED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SANDOZ INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AMGEN INC. and AMGEN 

MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:19-cv-00977-RS 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

FOR AMGEN’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS 

Case 3:19-cv-00977-RS Document 28 Filed 05/08/19 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR AMGEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. 3:19-cv-00977-RS 1 

pa-1895553

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Sandoz Inc. (“Sandoz”) and 

Defendants Amgen Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (collectively, “Amgen”), through 

their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Amgen filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22) on April 24, 2019; 

WHEREAS, under the existing briefing schedule, Sandoz’s opposition to the motion to 

dismiss is due today, May 8, 2019, and Amgen’s reply is due May 15, 2019; 

WHEREAS, today the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in the 

appeal from the related cases Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., Case No. 3:14-cv-04741-RS, and Amgen 

Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-02581-RS; 

WHEREAS, a short extension of the briefing schedule on the motion to dismiss would 

allow the parties to consider and account for the Federal Circuit opinion before submitting their 

opposition and reply briefs; 

WHEREAS, the parties believe the proposed extension is sufficiently short that it would 

still provide the Court with sufficient time between the completion of briefing and the hearing on 

the motion to dismiss; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby jointly request that the Court extend the time for 

Sandoz to file its opposition to May 13, 2019 and for Amgen to file its reply to May 20, 2019. 

Dated: May 8, 2019 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By: /s/ Erik J. Olson 

Erik J. Olson 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANDOZ INC. 

Case 3:19-cv-00977-RS Document 28 Filed 05/08/19 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR AMGEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. 3:19-cv-00977-RS. 2

pa-1895553 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories shown above. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________, 2019 

THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Dated: May 8, 2019 PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & 

GARRISON LLP 

By: /s/ Nicholas Groombridge 

Nicholas Groombridge 

Attorneys for Defendants 

AMGEN INC. and AMGEN 

MANUFACTURING, LIMITED 

Dated: May 8, 2019 By: /s/ Erik J. Olson 

Erik J. Olson 

May 8

Case 3:19-cv-00977-RS Document 28 Filed 05/08/19 Page 3 of 3