Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00909/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-00909-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 n:\lit\li2006\041145\00415946.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Deputy 

ELIZABETH L. DEELEY, State Bar #230798 

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3982 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

E-Mail: elizabeth.deeley@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DENNIS ROZADILLA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

SHERIFF MICHAEL HENNESSEY, et 

al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. c04-0909 MEJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CHANGE TIME FOR 

DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE 

MOTIONS 

U.S.D.C. Northern District 

L.R. 6-2 

Date Action Filed: July 9, 2004 

Trial Date: July 17, 2007 

 On September 20, 2006 the Court issued an order vacating the case management hearing and 

setting deadlines for discovery, dispositive motions and the exchange and filing of trial papers. 

Pursuant to the Court's order, the deadlines for expert disclosures is December 18, 2006, rebuttal 

expert disclosures is December 28, 2006 and the close of all discovery is January 12, 2006. The 

deadline for dispositive motions is February 8, 2007 and the hearing on dispositive motions is 

schedule for March 15, 2007. 

 To date, not all individually named defendants have been served. Plaintiff's counsel has 

discovered that he had the incorrect names and spellings for at least two individually named 

No. C04-0909 MEJ

Case 3:04-cv-00909-MEJ Document 55 Filed 12/18/06 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 n:\lit\li2006\041145\00415946.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

defendants. Those defendants have not yet been served. Plaintiff intends to file a corrected amended 

complaint with the correct names and spellings of those defendants, and will serve them promptly 

afterward. In addition, six of the newly named individual defendants are not employed by defendant 

City and County of San Francisco ("City"). These defendants are represented by counsel who was 

not involved in the case at the time that the parties filed there joint case management conference 

statement on September 14, 2007 and who has not yet filed an appearance in the case. Consequently, 

their counsel was not consulted about the proposed July, 2007 trial date suggested by the parties at 

that time or the corresponding deadlines. 

 Since the joint case management conference, the City has served plaintiff with written 

discovery, Plaintiff has taken three fact depositions and the parties have exchanged documents. The 

parties anticipate conducting additional depositions. The City has discovered that there are several 

additional medical providers for Plaintiff whose records have not been produced. Plaintiff does not 

have those records, so the City has issued third party subpoenas to obtain them. The City has not yet 

received those records, and does not anticipate receiving them until the third week in January at the 

earliest. The parties anticipates that their experts may rely on these additional medical records. The 

parties, thus, believe that they need additional time to complete discovery and obtain records. Based 

on this need and the fact that several defendants in this case have not yet been served, the parties by 

and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to the below changes to the discovery and 

briefing schedule so that they may complete necessary discovery before disclosing experts and in 

sufficient time to file dispositive motions. 

• Change expert disclosure deadline from December 18, 2006 to January 31, 2007 

• Change rebuttal expert disclosures from December 28, 2006 to February 15, 2007 

• Change fact and expert discovery cutoff from January 12, 2006 to March 9, 2007 

• Change deadline for dispositive motions from February 8, 2006 to March 21, 2007 

• Change hearing date for dispositive motions from March 15, 2007 to April 26, 2007 

/// 

/// 

/// 

No. C04-0909 MEJ

Case 3:04-cv-00909-MEJ Document 55 Filed 12/18/06 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 n:\lit\li2006\041145\00415946.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The parties respectfully request that they Court change the current scheduling order to reflect 

these changes. The parties have not previously sought to change any of the deadlines set in the 

Court's September 20, 2006 scheduling order. These changes should not affect the trial date. 

Dated: December 13, 2006 

DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER 

Chief Trial Deputy 

ELIZABETH L. DEELEY 

Deputy City Attorney 

By: /s/ 

ELIZABETH L. DEELEY 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

Dated: December 13, 2006 THE LAW OFFICE OF DENNIS CUNNINGHAM 

By: /s/ 

DENNIS CUNNINGHAM 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 DENNIS ROZADILLA 

 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated:______________________ __________________________________ 

 HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES 

 United States District Judge 

 

No. C04-0909 MEJ

December 18, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Maria-Elena James

Case 3:04-cv-00909-MEJ Document 55 Filed 12/18/06 Page 3 of 3