Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05496/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05496-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:6901 Resource &amp; Recovery Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

* While plaintiff simultaneously filed a motion to shorten time, it was denied.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH,

a non-profit corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

GOLDEN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY,

ARNOLD CARSTON, LARRY CARRILLO,

FRANCINE CLAYTON, and DOES 1–30,

inclusive,

Defendants. /

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

 /

No. C 09-05496 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

AND VACATING HEARING

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint was noticed for May 20,

2010.* Under the normal 35-day track, defendants’ opposition should have been filed on or

before April 29, 2010. It is now Friday, April 30, and no opposition has been filed. 

Defendants are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by NOON ON TUESDAY, MAY 4, 2010, why

plaintiff’s motion should not be treated as unopposed and granted. Since this failure throws off

the briefing schedule, the hearing on this motion is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-05496-WHA Document 28 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 1