Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00150/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00150-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID SHAVER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0150 FCD GGH P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 29, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:05-cv-00150-FCD-GGH Document 11 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 29, 2005, are adopted in full; and 

2. Defendants’ August 5, 2004 motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in

part as follows:

(a) granted as to plaintiff’s due process claims and these claims are dismissed;

(b) granted as to defendant Grannis and this defendant is dismissed;

(c) granted as to defendant Runnels, in his individual capacity only, and this

defendant is dismissed in his individual capacity;

(d) denied as to defendant Nauman on the Eighth Amendment claims only;

(e) denied as to defendant Runnels on the Eighth Amendment claims, in his

official capacity only, for prospective injunctive relief;

3. Defendants Nauman and Runnels are ordered to answer within 30 days of the

filed date of this order.

DATED:September 28, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00150-FCD-GGH Document 11 Filed 09/28/05 Page 2 of 2