Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01303/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-01303-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AND SERVE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT Case No. 5:06-CV-01303 JW

Scott A. Kamber, Esq. 

KAMBER & ASSOCIATES, LLC 

19 Fulton Street, Suite 400 

New York, New York 10038 

(877) 773-5469 (phone) 

(212) 202-6364 (facsimile) 

skamber@kolaw.com

David C. Parisi, Esq. (SBN 162248) 

Suzanne Havens Beckman (SBN 188814) 

PARISI & HAVENS LLP 

15233 Valleyheart Drive 

Sherman Oaks, California 91403 

(818) 990-1299 (phone) 

(818) 501-7852 (facsimile) 

dcparisi@parisihavens.com

shavens@parisihavens.com

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In Re ATI Tech. HDCP Litigation )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 5:06-CV-01303-JW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED 

ORDER] EXTENDING TIME FOR 

PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AND SERVE 

CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT 

[Local Rule 6-1] 

On April 18, 2006, the Court entered Case Management Order #1 (“CMO 1”), with the 

consent of all Parties. Pursuant to CMO 1, Plaintiffs were to file their consolidated complaint on 

May 29, 2006. It has recently come to the Parties attention that a new action has been filed in the 

U.S. District Court for the District of Tennessee (“Tennessee Action”). In order to conserve 

judicial resources, the parties have been working to obtain the voluntary transfer of the Tennessee 

action to this Court. In order to facilitate that objective and promote the efficient litigation of this 

matter, the Parties do hereby stipulate that Plaintiffs shall have an additional fourteen (14) days – 

up to and including June 12, 2006 –to file their Consolidated Complaint, with the objective of 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:06-cv-01303-JW Document 9 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AND SERVE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT Case No. 5:06-CV-01303 JW

including the Tennessee Action, and defendants shall have an additional fourteen (14) days – up to 

and including July 31, 2006 – in which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Consolidated 

Complaint. 

This is the first extension of time on any date in CMO 1. 

Dated: May ____, 2006 SHERMAN & STERLING LLP 

 By:________________________ 

 JEFFREY S. FACTER 

 JIYOUN CHUNG 

 525 Market Street 

 San Francisco, California 94105 

 Telephone: (415) 616-1100 

 Facsimile: (415) 616-1199 

Attorneys for Defendants ATI Technologies, Inc., 

ATI Technologies Systems Corp., ATI Research 

Silicon Valley Inc., and ATI Research, Inc.

Dated: May ___, 2006 PARISI & HAVENS LLP 

By: ____/S/_____________________

DAVID C. PARISI 

 15233 Valleyheart Drive 

Sherman Oaks, California 91403 

Telephone: (818) 990-1299 

Facsimile: (818) 501-7852 

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:_______________________

 ___________________________________ 

 HONORABLE JAMES WARE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case 5:06-cv-01303-JW Document 9 Filed 05/31/06 Page 2 of 3
MAY 31, 2006

Case 5:06-cv-01303-JW Document 9 Filed 05/31/06 Page 3 of 3