Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00322/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00322-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1319 Clean Water Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DISMISSAL -1- K:\OW W \Stipulations\06cv322.stip.dism.wpd

(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY)

WALTER LAW GROUP

a Professional Corporation

Gregory S. Powell #182199

7110 North Fresno Street, Ste. 400

Fresno, California 93720

Telephone: (559) 435-9800

Facsimile: (559) 435-9868

E-mail: gpowell@walterlawgroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Foothill Conservation LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

FOOTHILL CONSERVATION LLC, a

California Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

v.

STEVE E. DRAKE and KIM DRAKE,

individually and as trustees of the

STEVE E. DRAKE AND KIM DRAKE

LIVING TRUST; DRAKE

CONTRACTING, INC., a California

Corporation; TOM F. CAMPAGNA;

BRYAN LEHMAN; SHAYLA LEHMAN;

SHELDON CRAIG SANDSTROM;

HEATHER DAWN SANDSTROM; JOHN

KASAIAN; SUZETTE KASAIAN;

DOUGLAS BENIK; DIANA BENIK;

CHARLES W. HOUSE; MARY

MARGARET HOUSE; CHRISTOPHER

LUM as trustee of the LUM FAMILY

TRUST OF 1991 and as trustee of the

STEVEN C.Y. LUM AND CATHERINE J.

LUM TRUST DATED AUGUST 12,

1991; STEVEN G. FOGG; and

STEPHANIE FOGG; and DOES 1

through 10;

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 1:06-CV-00322-OWW-LJO

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE

DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT AND

COUNTERCLAIM WITH PREJUDICE

AS TO ALL PARTIES

[Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1)]

DOUGLAS BENIK and DIANA BENIK,

Counter-Complainants,

v.

FOOTHILL CONSERVATION, LLC, a

California Limited Liability Company,

Counter-Defendant.

Case 1:06-cv-00322-OWW -LJO Document 46 Filed 11/27/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DISMISSAL -2- K:\OW W \Stipulations\06cv322.stip.dism.wpd

It is hereby stipulated and agreed between the parties to this action, through

their designated counsel, that the above-captioned action, including the counterclaim, be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, as to all parties

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).

Dated: October 26, 2006 WALTER LAW GROUP

a Professional Corporation

 By: /s/ Gregory S. Powell 

 Gregory S. Powell, Attorneys for Plaintiff

Foothill Conservation, LLC

Dated: October 26, 2006 Pascuzzi, O’Neill & Moor

 /s/ Harry Pascuzzi

 By: (as authorized on October 26, 2006) 

 Kenneth J. Jorgenson,

Attorneys for Steve E. Drake and Kim Drake,

individually and as trustees of the Steve E.

Drake and Kim Drake Living Trust and Drake

Construction, Inc.

Dated: October 27, 2006 Zinkin & Bruce

 /s/ Daniel Bruce

By: (as authorized on October 27, 2006) 

Daniel Bruce, Attorneys for

Bryan Lehman and Shayla Lehman

Dated: October 25, 2006 Motschiedler, Michaellides & Wishon

 /s/ Ray S. Pool for Douglas V. Thornton

By: (as authorized on October 25, 2006) 

Douglas V. Thornton, Attorneys for

Sheldon Craig Sandstrom and Heather

Dawn Sandstrom

Dated: October 25, 2006 Penner, Bradley & Buettner

 /s/ Peter Sean Bradley

By: (as authrozied on October 25, 2006) 

Peter Sean Bradley, Attorneys for

John Kasaian and Suzelle Kasaian

Dated: October 25, 2006 Campagne & Campagne,

Case 1:06-cv-00322-OWW -LJO Document 46 Filed 11/27/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DISMISSAL -3- K:\OW W \Stipulations\06cv322.stip.dism.wpd

A Professional Corporation

/s/ Thomas E. Campagne for Justin T. Campagne

By: (as authroized on October 25, 2006) 

Justin T. Campagne, Attorneys for

Douglas Benik and Diana Benik

Dated: October 26, 2006 Lang, Richert & Patch

 /s/ Tracy E. Sagle

By: (as authorized on October 26, 2006) 

Tracey E. Sagle, Attorneys for

Charles W. House and Mary Margaret House

ORDER

Pursuant to the above stipulation, the above-captioned matter, including the

counter-claim, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 24. 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

IT IS

SO ORDERED.

Emm0d6Dated: Month Date(2)#, Year( 4 )# /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00322-OWW -LJO Document 46 Filed 11/27/06 Page 3 of 3