Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02261/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02261-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO STAY CASE, CASE NO. 14-cv-02261-JST IF "0" = "1" "LA 51846535v1" ""

Barry Himmelstein, SBN 157736

E-mail: barry@himmellaw.com

HIMMELSTEIN LAW NETWORK

2000 Powell St., Ste. 1605

Emeryville, CA 94608

Telephone: (510) 450-0782

Facsimile: (510) 380-6147

Sheri L. Kelly, SBN 226993

E-mail: slk@sherikellylaw.com

LAW OFFICE OF SHERI L. KELLY

31 E. Julian St.

San Jose, CA 95112

Telephone: (408) 287-7712

Facsimile: (408) 583-4249

Attorneys for Plaintiff Margo Perryman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MARGO PERRYMAN individually, and for 

other persons similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP; OCWEN 

LOAN SERVICING LLC; SOUTHWEST 

BUSINESS CORPORATION; AMERICAN 

SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY;

AMERICAN MODERN HOME 

INSURANCE COMPANY; ALTISOURCE 

PORTFOLIO SOLUTIONS, S.A.; and DOES 

4-100,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:14-cv-02261-JST

JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY CASE 

AGAINST DEFENDANT BELTLINE 

ROAD INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. AND 

SPECIALLY APPEARING DEFENDANT 

ALTISOURCE PORTFOLIO SOLUTIONS 

S.A. PENDING RESOLUTION OF 

SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS IN LEE 

V. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 180 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION TO STAY CASE, CASE NO. 14-cv-02261-JST

Plaintiff Margo Perryman (“Plaintiff”), defendant Beltline Road Insurance Agency, Inc. 

(“Beltline”) and specially appearing defendant Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. (“Altisource”), 

through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on October 21, 2014, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Class Action Complaint 

(“FAC”) against Altisource and Beltline challenging Altisource’s and Beltline’s practices relating 

to defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC’s lender-placed insurance program (Dkt. No. 108);

WHEREAS, on December 18, 2014, defendants Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (“Ocwen”) 

and American Security Insurance Company (“ASIC”) executed a settlement agreement in the case 

Lee v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 0:14-CV-60649 (“Lee”), pending in the United States 

District Court for the Southern District of Florida, which, if approved, will release Plaintiff’s 

claims, and the claims of the classes she seeks to represent, against Altisource and Beltline in this 

case (hereinafter the “Settlement”);

WHEREAS, on January 23, 2015, the Lee court entered an order preliminarily approving 

the Settlement. See Lee v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 0:14-CV-60649, 2015 WL 178220 at 

*8 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 13, 2015), report and recommendation adopted, No. 0:14-CV-60649, 2015 WL 

309441 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 23, 2015);

WHEREAS, in granting preliminary approval, the Lee court entered a preliminary 

injunction, providing that “[a]ll Settlement Class Members who do not timely exclude themselves 

from the Settlement Class are hereby preliminarily enjoined from directly or indirectly (i) filing, 

commencing, prosecuting, intervening in, or participating in (as class members or otherwise), any 

lawsuit in any jurisdiction for the Released Claims ...” Lee, 2015 WL 178220 at *8;

WHEREAS, on February 26, 2015, this Court entered an order granting Ocwen’s and 

ASIC’s motions to stay this case as against them in light of the Lee Settlement, finding that 

Plaintiff “is a Settlement Class Member in Lee and therefore is enjoined from participating in a 

lawsuit against Ocwen and ASIC regarding the claims covered by the Lee settlement.” (Dkt. No. 

177, p. 10);

WHEREAS, on February 26, 2015, this Court entered an order granting Beltline’s motion 

to dismiss, and also granted Plaintiff leave to amend to add additional allegations as to Beltline

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 180 Filed 03/12/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION TO STAY CASE, CASE NO. 14-cv-02261-JST

(Dkt. No. 177, p. 8);

WHEREAS, on February 26, 2015, Altisource filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims 

against it pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2), (b)(5) and (b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Dkt. 

No. 176);

WHEREAS, on March 3, 2015, Beltline filed a motion to stay this action as to Altisource 

and Beltline in light of the pending Lee Settlement (Dkt. No. 178);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Altisource, and Beltline hereby stipulate and agree to stay this 

action against Altisource and Beltline, including vacating the current response, reply, and hearing 

dates for Altisource’s pending motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 176) and Beltline’s pending motion to 

stay (Dkt. No. 178), until the Lee court enters an order either granting or denying final approval of 

the Settlement;

WHEREAS, if the Lee Court denies final approval, Plaintiff and Altisource stipulate and 

agree that Altisource shall have fourteen (14) days after the date final approval is denied to 

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiff, 

Altisource, and Beltline that:

• This action shall be stayed against Altisource and Beltline until the Lee Court 

enters an order either granting or denying final approval of the Settlement;

• The current response, reply, and hearing dates for Altisource’s pending motion to 

dismiss (Dkt. No. 176), and Beltline’s pending motion to stay (Dkt. No. 178), are 

hereby vacated;

• Nothing herein shall constitute a waiver of any defense of Altisource, including 

without limitation defenses based on lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction, and insufficient service of process; and

• If the Lee Court denies final approval, Altisource shall have fourteen (14) days 

after the date final approval is denied to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant 

to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 180 Filed 03/12/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION TO STAY CASE, CASE NO. 14-cv-02261-JST

DATED: March 11, 2015 LAW OFFICE OF SHERI L. KELLY

By: /s/ Sheri L. Kelly

 Attorney for Plaintiff

 MARGO PERRYMAN

DATED: March 11, 2015 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN

 By: /s/ David W. Moon

 Attorneys for Defendants

 ALTISOURCE PORTFOLIO 

SOLUTIONS, S.A., and BELTLINE

ROAD INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.

FILER’S ATTESTATION

I, Sheri L. Kelly, attest, pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from the other signatory to this document.

DATED: March 11, 2015 LAW OFFICE OF SHERI L. KELLY

Sheri L. Kelly

By: /s/ Sheri L. Kelly

 Sheri L. Kelly

 Attorney for Plaintiff

 MARGO PERRYMAN

[PROPOSED ORDER]

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

__________________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

 United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

March 12, 2015

Case 3:14-cv-02261-JST Document 180 Filed 03/12/15 Page 4 of 4