Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00928/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-00928-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Max. M. Hobson, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Safeway Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-00928-PHX-FJM

ORDER

We have before us defendants' motions to dismiss (docs. 57 and 58). Plaintiff did not

file a response to either motion. Under LRCiv 7.2(i), if an unrepresented party "does not

serve and file the required answering memoranda, . . . such non-compliance may be deemed

a consent to the denial or granting of the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion

summarily." Plaintiff's failure to respond may be deemed a consent to the granting of the

pending motions to dismiss. Any remaining unserved defendants are also dismissed,

pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P. and our Order dated November 4, 2011 (doc. 31).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED GRANTING defendants' motions to dismiss (doc.

57 and 58). 

DATED this 17th day of January, 2012.

Case 2:11-cv-00928-FJM Document 59 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 1