Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-03725/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-03725-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO

DISMISS -- CASE NO. C 03–3725 JW (HRL) 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 

David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758) 

Albert P. Bedecarré (Bar No. 148178) 

Emily C. O'Brien (Bar No. 240072) 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Email:davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com 

 albedecarre@quinnemanuel.com 

 emilycobrien@quinnemanuel.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim Defendant 

ZiLOG, Inc. 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

G. Hopkins Guy, III (State Bar No. 124811) 

Kevin Jones (State Bar No. 240205) 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 614-7400 

Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 

Email: hopguy@orrick.com 

 kjones@orrick.com 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

QuickLogic Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ZiLOG INC., 

a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

QUICKLOGIC CORPORATION 

a Delaware corporation, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 03-3725 JW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS 

AND COUNTERCLAIMS WITH 

PREJUDICE 

-----------------

-----------

Case 5:03-cv-03725-JW Document 93 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO

DISMISS -- CASE NO. C 03–3725 JW (HRL) 

S

 STIPULATION

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) and Civil Local Rule 7-12, IT IS 

HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff ZiLOG Inc. (“ZiLOG”) and 

Defendants Quicklogic Corporation (“Quicklogic”), through their respective counsel of record, as 

follows: 

 1. All claims in ZiLOG's Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed August 11, 2003, 

are dismissed with prejudice. 

 2. All claims in Quicklogic’s Answers and Counterclaims to ZiLOG’s Complaint for 

Patent Infringement, filed October 9, 2003, are dismissed with prejudice. 

 3. ZiLOG and Quicklogic shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees in connection 

with their prosecution and defense of the above-referenced claims. 

Dated: November 15, 2006 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 

 OLIVER & HEDGES 

By: /s/ Albert P. Bedecarre 

Albert P. Bedecarré 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ZiLOG Inc. 

Dated: November 15, 2006 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

By: /s/ G. Hopkins Guy III 

G. Hopkins Guy III 

Attorneys for Defendants 

QuickLogic Corporation 

----------

Case 5:03-cv-03725-JW Document 93 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO

DISMISS -- CASE NO. C 03–3725 JW (HRL) 

S

 ORDER

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________, 2006 

 

The Honorable James Ware 

United States District Judge 

OHS West:260120743.1 

8469-6 A3D/A3D 

Novmeber 16th ----------

Case 5:03-cv-03725-JW Document 93 Filed 11/16/06 Page 3 of 3