Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01558/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01558-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO KM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Morgan Adams, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 10-1558-PHX-RCB (ECV)

ORDER

On July 22, 2010, Plaintiff Morgan Adams, who is confined in the Maricopa County

Estrella Jail, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. On the same date, the Clerk of Court issued a

Notice of Assignment (Doc. 2) informing Plaintiff that his case had been received and

assigning a case number and a judge. The Notice of Assignment was mailed to Plaintiff on

July 23, 2010.

On August 16, 2010, the Court granted Plaintiff in forma pauperis status and

dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend (Doc. 5). On August 25, 2010, the screening

Order was returned to the Court with the notation “Void,” “Unclaimed,” and “Return to

Sender.” On September 30, 2010, the Clerk of Court entered a judgment of dismissal because

Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint.

On October 8, 2010, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Stop Withdrawal of Monies from

Plaintiff’s Account” (Doc. 9). In an October 25, 2010 Order, the Court denied the Motion.

Case 2:10-cv-01558-RCB--ECV Document 12 Filed 11/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

On October 29, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration asking the Court to

reconsider its denial of Plaintiff’s Motion to Stop Withdrawal of Monies. 

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s original Motion, the October 25, 2010 Order, and

Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. The Court finds no reason to reconsider its denial of

Plaintiff’s Motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s October 29, 2010 Motion for

Reconsideration (Doc. 11) is denied.

DATED this 18th day of November, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-01558-RCB--ECV Document 12 Filed 11/22/10 Page 2 of 2