Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01946/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01946-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1131 E.R.I.S.A. Collection of Delinquent Trust Funds

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW

NEYHART,

ANDERSON,

FLYNN &

GROSBOLL

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Benjamin K. Lunch, State Bar No. 246015

Wan Yan Ling, State Bar No. 297029

NEYHART, ANDERSON, FLYNN & GROSBOLL

369 Pine Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel. (415) 677-9440

Fax (415) 677-9445

Email: blunch@neyhartlaw.com

wling@neyhartlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Patricia Walsh, State Bar No. 121098

LEONIDOU & ROSIN

777 Cuesta Drive, Suite 200

Mountain View, CA 94040

Tel. (650) 691-2888

Fax (650) 691-2889 

Email: pwalsh@alr-law.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(Oakland Division)

ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY SERVICE 

BUREAU, INC., et al.

 Plaintiffs,

v.

J COPELLLO INTERNATIONAL CORP. 

d/b/a COPELLO ELECTRIC CO.

Defendant.

______________________________________

Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Case 4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document 23 Filed 09/14/15 Page 1 of 3 Case4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document22 Filed09/11/15 Page1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW

NEYHART,

ANDERSON,

FLYNN &

GROSBOLL

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties through undersigned counsel hereby 

stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the Initial Case Management 

Conference scheduled for September 18, 2015 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland 

Courthouse. The parties declare in support of this request:

WHEREAS, on April 29, 2015, Plaintiffs filed this Complaint against Defendant (Dckt. 

No. 1);

WHEREAS, on June 2, 2015, a copy of the Summons and Complaint was served on 

Defendant, as evidenced by the Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint filed with this 

Court (Dckt. No. 12);

WHEREAS, service having been completed and the answer period having elapsed without 

an answer or other responsive pleading filed with the Court, Plaintiffs requested that the Court 

enter default on July 6, 2015 (Dckt. No. 13);

WHEREAS, on July 7, 2015, default was entered against Defendant (Dckt. No. 14);

WHEREAS, on July 23, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Case Management Statement advising the 

Court of Plaintiffs’ intent to file a Motion for Default Judgment (Dckt. No. 15);

WHEREAS, on July 27, 2015, the Court issued an Order Continuing the Initial Case 

Management Conference to September 18, 2015 (Dckt. No. 16);

WHEREAS, on August 20, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Set Aside Default (Dckt. 

No. 17);

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to Defendant’s Motion 

to Set Aside Default (Dckt. No. 19);

Case 4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document 23 Filed 09/14/15 Page 2 of 3 Case4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document22 Filed09/11/15 Page2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 15-CV-1946-JSW

NEYHART,

ANDERSON,

FLYNN &

GROSBOLL

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

WHEREAS, on September 10, 2015, Defendant filed a Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to 

Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Default (Dckt. No. 20);

WHEREAS, the Motion Hearing is set for October 2, 2015 at 9:00 AM (Dckt. No. 18);

WHEREAS, in light of the pending Motion Hearing, both parties believe it would be 

premature for the Initial Case Management Conference to be held on September 18, 2015;

THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties though their respective 

attorneys stipulate as follows:

The parties respectfully request that the Court continue the Initial Case Management 

Conference till after the Motion Hearing has been held on October 2, 2015, and the Court has 

made a decision on said Motion. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

Dated: September 10, 2015 By: /s/ Wan Yan Ling

WAN YAN LING

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Neyhart, Anderson, Flynn & Grosboll

Dated: September 11, 2015 By: /s/ Patricia Walsh

PATRICIA WALSH

Attorney for Defendant

Leonidou & Rosin

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________________

Hon. Jeffrey S. White

United States District Judge 

Case4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document22 Filed09/11/15 Page3 of 4

The case management conference is continued pending the court's ruling on the motion to set aside 

default and shall be re-set, as necessary, upon disposition of that motion. September 14, 2015

Case 4:15-cv-01946-JSW Document 23 Filed 09/14/15 Page 3 of 3