Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08025/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08025-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Richard Leland Neal, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

State of Arizona, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 07-8025-PCT- SMM

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Set

Aside Plaintiff’s Application for Entry of Default Judgment (Dkt. 49), and Plaintiff’s Motion

for Leave to Amend Plaintiff’s Objection to and Response to State Defendant’s Motion to

Dismiss (Dkt. 50). Plaintiff has also lodged an Amended Objection to and Response to

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 51). In light of the Court’s Amended Order dated

September 14, 2007, dismissing the action without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction (Dkt. 48),

the Court finds these motions to be moot. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s

Motion to Set Aside Plaintiff’s Application for Entry of Default Judgment, and

IT IS ORDERED DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to 

Amend Plaintiff’s Objection to and Response to State Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.

//

//

Case 3:07-cv-08025-SMM Document 52 Filed 09/18/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED STRIKING AS MOOT Plaintiff’s Amended 

Objection to and Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.

DATED this 18th day of September, 2007.

Case 3:07-cv-08025-SMM Document 52 Filed 09/18/07 Page 2 of 2