Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02490/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02490-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael D. Mott,

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al.,

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-2490-PHX-SMM (VAM)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Motion for Specific Response from the United States

District Court filed by Petitioner on October 2, 2006. (Dkt. 33.) Petitioner requests a

specific response to the following question: “Did the U.S. District Court mail the sealed 81⁄2

X 12 envelope addressed to my legal assistant John Baker as I requested?” (Dkt. 33 at 1.)

The Motion refers to unspecified interference by prison officials with Petitioner’s legal

assistant, but fails to specify what “interference” by prison officials has hampered his ability

to litigate the present case with the aid of his legal assistant, or how the Court’s response to

the question presented above relates to any alleged “interference.” Moreover, Magistrate

Judge Mathis specifically addressed Petitioner’s allegations of “interference” in an April 24,

2006 Order denying his Motion for the Appointment of Counsel. See Dkt. 19. 

A judgment dismissing this case with prejudice was entered more than four months

before Petitioner filed his Motion for a Specific Response. See Dkts. 29, 33. The judgment

Case 2:05-cv-02490-SMM Document 35 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

is based on two Order entered by this Court after carefully considering Petitioner’s objections

and reconsidering one of the Court’s orders. See Dkts. 27, 28, 29, 34. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE from the docket

Petitioner’s Motion for Specific Response from the United States District Court. (Dkt. 33.)

DATED this 21st day of March, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-02490-SMM Document 35 Filed 03/22/07 Page 2 of 2