Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01576/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01576-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH ROBERT HUSKEY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PAM AHLIN, et al.,

Defendants. 

________________________________/

Case No. 1:09-cv-01576 OWW JLT (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 10)

Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 9, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were

served on Plaintiff and contained noticed that any objections to the findings and recommendations

were to be filed within twenty-one days. On December 28, 2010, Plaintiff filed timely objections

to the findings and recommendations.

1

Case 1:09-cv-01576-AWI-JLT Document 12 Filed 01/03/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302, the Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the magistrate

judge’s findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

/////

/////

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge filed December 9, 2010,

are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claims against Defendants Kanaley, Wagoner,

Rodgers, Ahlin, and King are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted; and

3. This action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s state law claims and Fourteenth Amendment

claims against Defendants Lasley and Pham.IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 30, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:09-cv-01576-AWI-JLT Document 12 Filed 01/03/11 Page 2 of 2