Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00444/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00444-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN DARNELL BRYANT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DR. SHAEFER, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 1:11-cv-00444-AWI-SKO PC

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW MOTION AS MOOT, 

RELIEVING PLAINTIFF OF STATUS 

REPORT REQUIREMENT, AND

GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS 

WITHIN WHICH TO FILE 

SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO 

MOTION TO DISMISS

(Docs. 31, 38, and 46)

Plaintiff Kevin Darnell Bryant, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 

filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on March 17, 2011. On July 12, 2013, 

Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to withdraw his previously filed motion for a stay and an order to 

return his property.

Plaintiff’s motion is moot in light of the order filed on July 5, 2013, and given the return of 

Plaintiff’s property, Plaintiff is no longer required to file a status report in compliance with that

order. 

Pursuant to the order filed on April 30, 2013, Plaintiff is now granted thirty days within 

which to file a supplemental opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, if he elects to do so. 

///

///

Case 1:11-cv-00444-AWI-SKO Document 47 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his motion for a stay and an order to return his

property, filed on July 12, 2013, is DENIED as moot;

2. Plaintiff is relieved of his obligation to file a status report in compliance with the 

order filed on July 5, 2013; and

3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff may file a 

supplemental opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 16, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

i0d3h8j27

Case 1:11-cv-00444-AWI-SKO Document 47 Filed 07/16/13 Page 2 of 2