Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-01317/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-01317-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:183 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

CASE NO. 5:13-cv-01317 EJD

ORDER RE: COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULE 79-5(d)

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

et. al.,

Plaintiff(s),

 v.

GOOGLE, INC., et. al.,

Defendant(s). /

CASE NO. 5:13-cv-01317 EJD

ORDER RE: COMPLIANCE WITH 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 79-5(d)

Presently before the court are two Motions to Seal certain documents filed by the parties in

connection with Defendants’ Motion to Stay Pending Inter-Parties Review and Arbitration. See

Docket Item Nos. 303, 309. Part of Defendants’ sealing request involves documents designated

confidential by Plaintiffs. The entirety of Plaintiffs’ sealing request involves documents desiganted

confidential by Defendants. 

Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) states:

If a party wishes to file a document that has been designated

confidential by another party pursuant to a protective order, or if a

party wishes to refer in a memorandum or other filing to information

so designated by another party, the submitting party must file and

serve an Administrative Motion for a sealing order and lodge the

document, memorandum or other filing in accordance with this rule. 

If only a portion of the document, memorandum or other filing is

sealable, the submitting party must also lodge with the Court a

redacted version of the document, memorandum or other filing to be

placed in the public record if the Court approves the requested sealing

order. Within 7 days thereafter, the designating party must file with

Case 5:13-cv-01317-EJD Document 313 Filed 07/03/14 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

CASE NO. 5:13-cv-01317 EJD

ORDER RE: COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULE 79-5(d)

the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the designated

information is sealable, and must lodge and serve a narrowly tailored

proposed sealing order, or must withdraw the designation of

confidentiality. If the designating party does not file its responsive

declaration as required by this subsection, the document or proposed

filing will be made part of the public record.

The sealing motions were filed on May 21, 2014, and June 13, 2014, respectively. Yet,

neither party has filed an appropriate declaration pursuant to the relevant portion of Civil Local Rule

79-5(d) supporting their confidentiality designations in response to the opposing party’s Motion to

Seal.

Accordingly, the court extends the deadline for the parties to file declarations pursuant to

Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) until July 8, 2014. Failure to file a compliant declaration by the extended

deadline will result in an order denying the sealing motions in whole or in part. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 3, 2014 

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

Case 5:13-cv-01317-EJD Document 313 Filed 07/03/14 Page 2 of 2