Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01021/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01021-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

---

Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP

1111 Broadway, 24th Floor 

Oakland, CA 94607-4036 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

015215.0001\842046.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. C 06 

1021 PJH (WDB) 

Matthew F. Graham (Bar No. 95194) 

mgraham@wendel.com 

Tammy A. Brown (Bar No. 172612) 

tbrown@wendel.com 

WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP 

1111 Broadway, 24th Floor 

Oakland, California 94607-4036 

Telephone: (510) 834-6600 

Fax: (510) 834-1928 

Attorneys for Cross-Defendant and CrossClaimant 

Neoplan USA Corporation 

Dennis J. Herrera, Esq. 

City Attorney 

Kristine A. Poplawski, Esq. 

Deputy City Attorney 

1390 Market Street, Seventh Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Phone: (415) 554-3878 

Fax: (415) 554-3985 

Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant 

City and County of San Francisco 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND 

SURETY COMPANY, a Connecticut 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, a California municipal 

corporation; GENERAL MOTORS 

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; 

LORONIX, INC., a California corporation, 

VERINT SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 06 1021 PJH (WDB) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF 

NEOPLAN’S CLAIMS AGAINST THE 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO

DATE ACTION FILED: 2/14/06 

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. 

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), and the parties’ Stipulation of 

Dismissal, cross-claimant Neoplan USA Corporation n/k/a IAPNUC Corporation (“Neoplan”) 

moves for dismissal with prejudice of all causes of action asserted by Neoplan against the City. 

/ / / 

Case 4:06-cv-01021-PJH Document 160 Filed 03/26/08 Page 1 of 2
Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP

1111 Broadway, 24th Floor 

Oakland, CA 94607-4036 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

015215.0001\842046.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. C 06 

1021 PJH (WDB) - 2 - 

Upon consideration whereof and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

all causes of action asserted by Neoplan against the City and County of San Francisco be, and the 

same hereby are, DISMISSED, with prejudice, with the parties bearing their own costs, attorneys’ 

fees, and expenses related to those claims. 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: _______________________, 2008 

Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton 

United States District Court Judge 

Northern District of California 

March 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-01021-PJH Document 160 Filed 03/26/08 Page 2 of 2