Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02167/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02167-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RANDY LAMAR BLACK,

Plaintiff,

v.

P. THOMPSON, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:21-cv-2167-EFB P

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. On January 13, 2022, the court found that plaintiff had not submitted a certified 

trust account statement in support of his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 11. 

Accordingly, the court directed plaintiff to submit the required trust account statement 

within thirty days. Id. The court also warned plaintiff that failure to do so would result in this 

action being dismissed. Id. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not submitted 

the required trust account statement or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States 

District Judge to this case.

/////

/////

Case 2:21-cv-02167-TLN-EFB Document 13 Filed 02/17/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

Dated: February 17, 2022.

Case 2:21-cv-02167-TLN-EFB Document 13 Filed 02/17/22 Page 2 of 2