Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-alnd-7_15-cv-00119/USCOURTS-alnd-7_15-cv-00119-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

WESTERN DIVISION

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

Plaintiff Hasalee Mims filed a document entitled “Plaintiff’s Objection to 

the Court Ruling.” The Court interprets this document as a Motion under Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to Alter or Amend a Judgment. Mims’s Motion is 

nonresponsive to the reasons given for dismissal and does nothing more than repeat 

the arguments presented in his initial complaint. The Motion does discuss that the 

statute he is objecting to has been repealed, and it does not provide any reason why 

the statute of limitations for a § 1983 claim for damages should be tolled. 

Accordingly, Mims’s Motion is DENIED. 

HASALEE MIMS,

Plaintiff,

 vs.

ROBERT BENTLEY, et al,

Defendant.

7:15-cv-00119-LSC

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

FILED

 2015 Oct-19 PM 02:51

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

N.D. OF ALABAMA

Case 7:15-cv-00119-LSC Document 12 Filed 10/19/15 Page 1 of 2
Done and Ordered this 19th day of October 2015.

L. SCOTT COOGLER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

182185

Case 7:15-cv-00119-LSC Document 12 Filed 10/19/15 Page 2 of 2