Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01363/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01363-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICO RILEY,

Petitioner,

v.

PRUDHLE,

Respondent.

Case No. 2:24-cv-1363-TLN-JDP (P)

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 5, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 

were served on petitioner, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The deadline has passed, and no 

objections have been filed. 

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 

magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] 

court[.]”). The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

Case 2:24-cv-01363-TLN-JDP Document 6 Filed 12/06/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 5, 2024, (ECF No. 5), are 

ADOPTED in full;

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee, to 

prosecute, and to comply with court orders for the reasons set forth in the prior order 

on September 30, 2024, (ECF No. 4);

3. The Court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253; and 

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

DATE: December 5, 2024

___________________________________

TROY L. NUNLEY

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:24-cv-01363-TLN-JDP Document 6 Filed 12/06/24 Page 2 of 2