Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05678-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT 

FOR THE PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER BRIEF

Hassan A. Zavareei (SBN 181547)

hzavareei@tzlegal.com

Andrea R. Gold (admitted pro hac vice)

agold@tzlegal.com

Andrew J. Silver (admitted pro hac vice)

asilver@tzlegal.com

TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

1828 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000

Washington, DC 20036

Tel.: (202) 973-0900

Fax: (202) 973-0950

Kristen Law Sagafi (SBN 222249)

ksagafi@tzlegal.com

TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

483 Ninth Street, Suite 200

Oakland, CA 94607

Tel.: (510) 907-7255

Fax: (202) 973-0950

Attorneys for Plaintiffs James Lathrop, 

Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, 

Jennifer Reilly, and Justin Bartolet

Sarah J. Crooks (admitted pro hac vice)

SCrooks@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

1120 NW Couch Street, 10th Floor

Portland, OR 97209

Tel.: (503) 727-2252

Fax: (503) 346-2252

Debra R. Bernard (admitted pro hac vice)

dbernard@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

131 South Dearborn, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60603

Tel.: (312) 324-8559

Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES LATHROP, JONATHAN 

GRINDELL, SANDEEP PAL, JENNIFER 

REILLY, and JUSTIN BARTOLET on 

behalf of themselves and all others 

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-05678-JST

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT 

FOR THE PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER 

BRIEF

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 126 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT 

FOR THE PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER BRIEF

Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin 

Bartolet (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and 

through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2016, Plaintiffs and Defendant will submit a supplemental 

joint letter brief describing any remaining discovery disputes from the December 23, 2015 joint 

letter brief;

WHEREAS, the joint letter brief will address issues that are significant to the case, will 

involve highly technical information about whether generating certain information is 

technologically possible or feasible, and will incorporate deposition testimony, expert opinion, 

and documents that require explanation;

WHEREAS, this Court’s Civil Standing Order requires joint letter briefs to be five pages 

or less;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the Court would benefit from briefing that more 

comprehensively addresses the issues presented; and

WHEREAS, the Parties request a five-page enlargement of the Court’s page limitation for 

joint letter briefs. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:

The Parties agree, subject to Court approval, to submit the supplemental joint letter brief 

of ten pages or less that describes the remaining disputed discovery issues, where the 

aforementioned ten pages will be single-spaced using 12-point Times New Roman font and 

includes neither the caption, which will be provided in a separate cover sheet, nor the signatures 

of counsel, which will be provided on the eleventh page.

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 126 Filed 02/03/16 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT 

FOR THE PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER BRIEF

DATED: February 2, 2016 TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

By: /s/ Hassan A. Zavareei

Hassan A. Zavareei, Bar No. 181547

hzavareei@tzlegal.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs

DATED: February 2, 2016 PERKINS COIE LLP

By: /s/ Debra R. Bernard

Debra R. Bernard (admitted pro hac vice)

DBernard@perkinscoie.com

Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 126 Filed 02/03/16 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT 

FOR THE PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER BRIEF

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

The Honorable Jon S. Tigar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

February 3, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 126 Filed 02/03/16 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-5-

FILER’S ATTESTATION

129624745.2

FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned 

attests that all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation.

DATED: February 2, 2016 TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

By: /s/ Hassan A. Zavareei

Hassan A. Zavareei

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 3:14-cv-05678-JST Document 126 Filed 02/03/16 Page 5 of 5