Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03676/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03676-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Susan Emma Kelly,

Plaintiff,

 v.

County of Santa Clara, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

NO. C 04-03676 JW 

ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL TIME; 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

SETTLEMENT

On September 29, 2005, the parties filed a Joint Statement in Response to Order to Show

Cause Re: Settlement (Docket No. 66) informing the Court that the above-entitled matter has reached a

settlement, but that the parties require additional time to process the settlement paperwork. This Court

grants the parties' request for additional time. The hearing to show cause currently scheduled for

October 17, 2005 is vacated. On or before December 16, 2005, the parties shall file a stipulated

dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). 

If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, all parties shall appear in Courtroom No. 8, 4th

Floor, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, Ca. on January 9, 2006, at 9:00

a.m. and to show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

On or before December 16, 2005, the parties shall file a joint statement in response to the Order to

Show Cause. The joint statement shall set forth the status of the activities of the parties for finalizing

the settlement and how much additional time is requested to finalize and file the dismissal. If a

voluntary dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically

Case 5:04-cv-03676-JW Document 67 Filed 10/05/05 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

vacated.

Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss this

action.

Dated: October 5, 2005

04eciv3676oscext

 /s/ James Ware 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:04-cv-03676-JW Document 67 Filed 10/05/05 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

James McManis jmcmanis@mfmlaw.com

Jessica Valenzuela Santamaria jvalenzuelasantamaria@mfmlaw.com

Stephen H. Schmid stephen.schmid@cco.co.santa-clara.ca.us

Dated: October 5, 2005 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By:___/s/ JW Chambers________

Ronald L. Davis

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:04-cv-03676-JW Document 67 Filed 10/05/05 Page 3 of 3