Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02281/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-02281-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOTAL RECALL TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

 v.

OCULUS VR, INC., and PALMER

LUCKEY

Defendants. /

No. C 15-02281 WHA

ORDER REQUESTING

COMMENT FROM

DEFENDANTS

On August 31, plaintiff filed an amended complaint in lieu of responding to defendants’

motion to dismiss. By SEPTEMBER 2 AT NOON, defendants shall inform the Court whether the

amended complaint addresses the arguments raised in their motion to dismiss such that the

motion should be denied as moot, without prejudice to a renewed motion to dismiss based on the

amended pleadings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 1, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-02281-WHA Document 41 Filed 09/01/15 Page 1 of 1