Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01998/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-01998-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cynthia Hogg and Deon Runge, a married

couple, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department, et

al., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 10-1998-PHX-MHM

ORDER

In an October 21, 2010 Order, this Court granted Plaintiffs’ counsel’s motion to

withdraw. (Doc. 14). In the same Order, the Court gave Plaintiff until November 3, 2010,

to secure new counsel and warned Defendants that if they failed to secure new counsel by

that date, the Court would assume they were proceeding pro-se. The Court further ordered

that if Defendants elected to proceed pro-se, they must file a response to Defendant Maricopa

County Sheriff’s Department’s Motion to Dismiss no later than November 18, 2010, and that

their failure to file such a response would result in this Court summarily granting

Defendant’s motion pursuant to LRCiv 7.2(I). Plaintiff have neither hired a new attorney nor

responded to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.

/ / / 

Case 2:10-cv-01998-TMB Document 15 Filed 12/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendant Maricopa County Sheriff’s

Department’s Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 9).

DATED this 20th day of December, 2010.

Case 2:10-cv-01998-TMB Document 15 Filed 12/21/10 Page 2 of 2