Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01033/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01033-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAULA WHITEROCK,

Plaintiff,

v.

OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT 

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-01033-KAW 

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S 

FAILURE TO RESPOND TO THE JULY 

27, 2015 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On July 27, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to “(1) show cause why her case should not 

be dismissed for failure to prosecute, and (2) file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a 

statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss.” (Dkt. No. 40 at 1.) Plaintiff was advised 

that the response to the order to show cause and the opposition should be filed as separate 

documents. Id. Despite this instruction, Plaintiff only filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss. 

(See Pl.’s Opp’n, Dkt. No. 41.) To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to respond to the July 27, 2015 Order to Show Cause on 

or before September 8, 2015. Specifically, Plaintiff must explain why she did not file a timely

opposition and why her case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Court will hold 

a hearing on the order to show cause on September 17, 2015 alongside the hearing on Defendants’ 

motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. Failure to file a timely response may result in the 

dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 26, 2015

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:15-cv-01033-KAW Document 46 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 1