Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00037/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-00037-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Somtai Troy Charoensak & Mariana Rosen,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

Apple Computer, Inc., 

Defendant. /

NO. C 05-00037 JW 

ORDER FOLLOWING FURTHER CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

On November 20, 2006, the Court conducted a Further Case Management Conference. Roy

Katriel of the Katriel Law Firm appeared on behalf of the Plaintiffs, and Robert Mittelstaedt of Jones

Day appeared on behalf of the Defendant. The Court hereby orders as follows:

Class Certification. Plaintiffs shall file and serve their motion for class certification by

January 22, 2007. Defendant shall file and serve its opposition by March 12, 2007. Plaintiffs shall

file and serve their reply by April 2, 2007. The Court will conduct a hearing on Plaintiffs' motion

for class certification on April 16, 2007 at 9 AM. 

Further Case Management Conference. The Court will conduct a Further Case

Management Conference on March 19, 2007 at 10 AM, for the purpose of discussing what

additional discovery, if any, should take place, prior to Plaintiffs filing their reply in support of their

motion for class certification. 

Discovery. The parties shall limit their discovery to class certification issues. This

limitation shall be in effect until Defendant files its anticipated motion for summary judgment. If

Case 4:05-cv-00037-YGR Document 86 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Defendant files such motion, Plaintiffs may seek additional discovery. The parties are referred to

Magistrate Trumbull for resolution of any discovery disputes. 

It is further ordered that discovery in this case shall be coordinated with discovery in Tucker

v. Apple Computer, Inc., C 06-4457 JW. The parties shall notice depositions in both cases. Any

depositions noticed in Tucker shall not count towards the deposition limit set by the Court for this

action, and any depositions noticed in this action shall not count towards the deposition limit set by

the Court in Tucker. Discovery produced in this action shall be made available and be usable to the

Plaintiff's counsel in Tucker to the same extent as if it had been produced in that action, and

discovery produced in Tucker shall be made available and usable to the Plaintiff's counsel in this

action to the same extent as if it had been produced in this action.

Dated: November 21, 2006 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-00037-YGR Document 86 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Adam Richard Sand arsand@JonesDay.com

Brian P Murray bmurray@rabinlaw.com

Caroline N. Mitchell cnmitchell@jonesday.com

Jacqueline Sailer jsailer@murrayfrank.com

John J. Stoia jstoia@lerachlaw.com

Michael David Braun service@braunlawgroup.com

Robert A. Mittelstaedt ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com

Roy A. Katriel rak@katriellaw.com

Tracy Strong tstrong@jonesday.com

Dated: November 21, 2006 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: /s/ JW Chambers 

Elizabeth Garcia

Courtroom Deputy

Case 4:05-cv-00037-YGR Document 86 Filed 11/21/06 Page 3 of 3