Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-00675/USCOURTS-azd-2_13-cv-00675-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Ali Zugair Aljibory, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-13-00675-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

 Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

2254 on April 1, 2013 raising two grounds for relief: 1) that his due process rights were 

denied when the Superior Court denied his request for an Arabic translator; and 2) that he 

received constitutionally ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Respondents filed their 

Response to Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on June 11, 2013. No reply 

was filed. On February 21, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and 

Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. 

 In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that 

they had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation 

within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such 

objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been 

filed. 

Case 2:13-cv-00675-SRB Document 14 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge. 

 IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge as the order of this Court. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied 

and dismissed with prejudice. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because dismissal of the petition is justified by a 

plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable 

and because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

 Dated this 14th day of March, 2014. 

 

Case 2:13-cv-00675-SRB Document 14 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 2