Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01946/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-01946-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WALKER & ZANGER INC,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PARAGON INDUSTRIES INC,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

No. C 04-01946 VRW (JCS)

DISCOVERY ORDER 

Following the Discovery Conference held on July 22, 2005, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The Court adopts the Joint Discovery Plan, except as modified by this Order.

A further Discovery Conference is set for September 9, 2005, at 1:30 p.m., before Magistrate

Judge Spero, in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate, San Francisco,

California. If there are any discovery issues that the parties want the Court to address, a Joint Updated

Discovery Statement shall be filed by September 2, 2005.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Industry Expert language, under section 2.12

of the Stipulated Protective Order, is defined as proposed in the draft submitted to the Court by Plaintiff.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT:

1. By August 5, 2005, the parties shall meet-and-confer and submit to the Court a list of the

30(b)(6) topics that both sides agree to, and identify those individuals who will speak to those topics. 

Deposition discovery is limited to those witnesses, and not more than three (3) additional depositions per

side of unidentified witnesses.

2. All expert disclosures required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall be made by

October 17, 2005. Expert rebuttal disclosures shall be made by October 31, 2005.

Case 3:04-cv-01946-VRW Document 55 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. All non-expert discovery shall be completed by October 17, 2005.

4. All discovery from experts shall be completed by November 18, 2005.

5. Before filing any future discovery motions lead trial counsel for Plaintiff and lead trial

counsel for Defendant shall meet and confer in person regarding the subject matter of the Motions in an

effort to resolve these matters. The location of the meet-and-confer session shall alternate with the first

meeting location to be at Plaintiff’s office, the second meeting to be held at Defendant’s office, or at a

mutually agreeable location. Any side may demand a meeting on ten (10) days’ notice after efforts to

resolve the matter through letters and/or phone calls have been unsuccessful. At the conclusion of the

meet-and-confer session the parties shall submit a Joint Letter to the Court. This Joint Letter shall include

a description of every issue in dispute and, with respect to each such issue, a detailed summary of each

party’s final substantive position and their final proposed compromise on each issue. Upon receipt of the

Joint Letter the Court will then determine what additional proceedings will be necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 27, 2005

/s/ Joseph C. Spero 

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-01946-VRW Document 55 Filed 07/27/05 Page 2 of 2