Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01674/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-01674-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 08cv1674 JLS(RBB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OBIE STEVEN ANTHONY,

Plaintiff,

v.

LEW, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 08cv1674 JLS (RBB)

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

[DOC. NO. 30]

On March 4, 2010, Defendants Cate and Small filed a Motion for

Judgment on the Pleadings [doc. no. 30]. On May 13, 2010, the

Court held a telephonic settlement conference during which

Plaintiff stated that he had no objection to Defendants’ Motion and

also agreed to dismiss both Cate and Small [doc. no. 32]. The

Court issued a separate minute order reflecting Plaintiff’s consent

to granting the Motion [doc. no. 32]. Thus, the Court recommends

GRANTING Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [doc. no.

30] and DISMISSING Defendants Cate and Small. 

This Report and Recommendation will be submitted to the United

States District Court judge assigned to this case, pursuant to the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Any party may file written

objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties on or

Case 3:08-cv-01674-JLS-RBB Document 33 Filed 05/14/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K:\COMMON\BROOKS\CASES\1983\PRISONER\ANTHONY1674\R&R re Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.wpd 2 08cv1674 JLS(RBB)

before June 10, 2010. The document should be captioned “Objections

to Report and Recommendation.” Any reply to the objections shall

be served and filed on or before June 17, 2010. The parties are

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

may waive the right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: May 13, 2010 _____________________________

RUBEN B. BROOKS

 United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Judge Sammartino

All Parties of Record

Case 3:08-cv-01674-JLS-RBB Document 33 Filed 05/14/10 Page 2 of 2