Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02359/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02359-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1127 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HOWREY LLP

Robert N. Phillips (SBN 120970) 

Lisa S. Buccino (SBN 205266) 

HOWREY, LLP 

525 Market Street, Suite 3600 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 848-4900 

Facsimilie: (415) 848-4999 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INTEL CORPORATION

Robbin M. Coker 

LAW OFFICES OF ROBBIN M. COKER 

2308 J Street, Suite D 

Sacramento, CA 95816 

Telephone: (916) 329-7216 

Facsimilie: (916) 329-7237 

Attorney for Defendant 

INTELL DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTELL DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC., a 

California corporation, d/b/a INTELL SECURITY 

SYSTEMS, INTELL SECURITY SYSTEMS & 

ALARM EXPRESS, INTELL SECURITY & 

ALARM EXPRESS, and INTELL HANDYMAN 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: 2:05-CV-2359 MCE 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING DISMISSAL 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and Defendant INTELL 

DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation also doing business as INTELL SECURITY 

SYSTEMS, INTELL SECURITY SYSTEMS & ALARM EXPRESS, INTELL SECURITY & 

ALARM EXPRESS, and INTELL HANDYMAN through their counsel hereby stipulate as follows: 

Case 2:05-cv-02359-MCE -PAN Document 12 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- 

HOWREY LLP

1. Pursuant to a written confidential settlement agreement between the parties, this entire Action 

shall be dismissed without prejudice until the terms of the agreement are performed in full, at 

which time the entire Action will be deemed dismissed with prejudice. 

2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties for the purpose of enforcing the terms of 

their confidential settlement agreement until performance in full of each and every term therein. 

Dated:04/06/06 Respectfully Submitted, 

By:/s/ Robert N. Phillips 

Robert N. Phillips 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

INTEL CORPORATION 

By:/s/ Robbin M. Coker 

Robbin M. Coker 

Attorney for Defendant 

INTELL DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 18, 2006 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cv-02359-MCE -PAN Document 12 Filed 04/19/06 Page 2 of 2