Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-04179/USCOURTS-cand-4_13-cv-04179-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

Stip. And [Prop. Order] re Service

of Pl.’s Corrected Amended

Infringement Contentions

4:13-cv-04179 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOHN W. CARPENTER (Bar No. 221708)

829 Baronne Street

New Orleans, LA 700113

Telephone: (504) 581-9311

Facsimile: 1- 866-410-6248

Email: john@jwcarpenterlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Albert John Freeman

ADDITIONAL COUNSEL ON SIGNATURE PAGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT JOHN FREEMAN, 

an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.,

Defendant.

CASE NO.: 4:13-cv-04179-JSW/JCS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE FILING OF PLAINTIFF’S 

CORRECTED AMENDED 

INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 

PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 3-6

Plaintiff Albert John Freeman and Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc. hereby consent and 

stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, On January 12, 2015, this Court entered an order [Doc 92] permitting Plaintiff 

to serve amended infringement contentions, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties [Doc 91];

WHEREAS, Plaintiff seeks to serve Corrected Amended Infringement Contentions, in the 

form attached hereto as Exhibit A, because plaintiff’s counsel Victoria E. Brieant inadvertently 

omitted the infringement contentions for Claims 26 and 29 in the filing with Doc 91 and in the 

subsequent service of plaintiff’s amended infringement contentions;

Case 4:13-cv-04179-JSW Document 94 Filed 02/11/15 Page 1 of 4 Case4:13-cv-04179-JSW Document93 Filed02/11/15 Page1 of 6
Stip. And [Prop. Order] re Service

of Pl.’s Corrected Amended

Infringement Contentions

4:13-cv-04179 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel had included the claim charts for Claims 26 and 29 when 

counsel sought Defendant’s consent to plaintiff’s amended infringement contentions and 

Defendant had consented to their inclusion in the amended infringement contentions;

WHEREAS, Defendant’s counsel graciously brought the omission of Claims 26 and 29 to 

plaintiff’s counsel’s attention and has consented to permit plaintiff to correct this clerical error and 

serve corrected infringement contentions in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

WHEREAS, Exhibit A is the same as the amended claim construction charts attached as 

Exhibit A to Doc 91, except for inclusion of the inadvertently omitted claims.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff seeks to serve corrected amended infringement contentions;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s proposed corrected amended infringement contentions are 

submitted concurrently herewith as Appendix A;

WHEREAS, Defendant consents to Plaintiff’s service of corrected amended infringement 

contentions, subject to the entry of this Order;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff submits that its proposed corrected amendment to his infringement 

contentions would not prejudice Defendant, since it is a clerical correction. 

WHEREAS, Defendant, if it deems it necessary, shall have forty-five (45) days to respond 

to Plaintiff’s corrected amended infringement contentions by providing amended invalidity 

contentions;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff consents to Defendant serving its amended invalidity contentions 

forty five (45) days after Plaintiff’s filing of his corrected amended infringement contentions if 

Defendant elects to do so;

WHEREAS, By consenting to the service of amended infringement contentions, Defendant 

is not conceding and expressly reserves all rights to contest the legal or factual adequacy of 

Case 4:13-cv-04179-JSW Document 94 Filed 02/11/15 Page 2 of 4 Case4:13-cv-04179-JSW Document93 Filed02/11/15 Page2 of 6
Stip. And [Prop. Order] re Service

of Pl.’s Corrected Amended

Infringement Contentions

4:13-cv-04179 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff’s alleged amended infringement contentions including all issues raised in Defendant's letter 

to the Court regarding Plaintiff's First Amended Infringement Contentions [Doc 50];; and

WHEREAS, The service of Plaintiff’s corrected amended infringement contentions and 

Defendant' optional service of amended invalidity contentions will not affect any of the deadlines 

set by the Court’s orders or the Local Rules.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant agree that renewed or additional document 

production or other obligation by Defendant under Patent L.R. 3-4 will not be triggered or required 

by the filing of corrected amended infringement contentions or the service of Defendant' amended 

invalidity contentions, and Plaintiff will not request any additional documents to be served under 

Patent L.R. 3-4. 

WHEREFORE, IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. That pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-6, Plaintiff’s corrected amended infringement 

contentions shall be served no later than five business days after entry of this Order; and

2. That pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-6, Defendant shall have 45 days from service of 

Plaintiff’s corrected amended infringement contentions to serve its amended invalidity 

contentions, if it elects to do so.

In accordance with N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, Section X, the filer of this document 

attests that she obtained the consent of the other signatory hereto.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Dated: February 11, 2015. Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Victoria E. Brieant

Victoria E. Brieant (CA Bar No. 141519)

Law Office of Victoria E. Brieant

Case 4:13-cv-04179-JSW Document 94 Filed 02/11/15 Page 3 of 4 Case4:13-cv-04179-JSW Document93 Filed02/11/15 Page3 of 6
Stip. And [Prop. Order] re Service

of Pl.’s Corrected Amended

Infringement Contentions

4:13-cv-04179 5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing, 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1. Plaintiff Freeman’s proposed corrected amended infringement contentions shall be 

served no later than five business days after entry of this Order; and

2. Defendant Delta Air Lines shall have 45 days from service of Plaintiff’s corrected 

amended infringement contentions to serve its amended invalidity contentions.

DATED: February __, 2015.

________________________________

HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 11th day of February, 2015, I will electronically file the 

foregoing STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF PLAINTIFF’S 

CORRECTED AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO 

PATENT L.R. 3-6 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will then send a 

Notification of Filing (NEF) to counsel for plain__tiff at the addresses below:

David H.S. Commins at david@commins.com

Kit L. Knudsen at kit@commins.com

Stephen F. Roth at SRoth@ldlkm.com

Alexander Solo at ASolo@ldlkm.com

By: /s/ Victoria E. Brieant

Case4:13-cv-04179-JSW Document93 Filed02/11/15 Page5 of 6

11

Case 4:13-cv-04179-JSW Document 94 Filed 02/11/15 Page 4 of 4