Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00996/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00996-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY ROBERT BRATTON III,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0996 MCE GGH P

vs.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Petitioner alleges that the California Board of Prison Terms (BPT) improperly

found him unsuitable for parole. While petitioner attaches a copy of the 2003 decision by the

BPT finding him unsuitable, petitioner does not identify the specific suitability hearing he is

challenging. The court observes that petitioner has filed another action in this court challenging

the July 2005 decision by the BPT finding him unsuitable, CIV S-06-986 MCE KJM P. Because

petitioner has not identified the specific suitability hearing he is challenging in the instant action,

the petition is dismissed with leave to amend. If petitioner files an amended petition, he must

identify the hearing he is challenging.

/////

Case 2:06-cv-00996-MCE -GGH Document 4 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is

dismissed with thirty days to file an amended petition; failure to comply with this order will

result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action.

DATED: 6/27/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

brat996.ord

Case 2:06-cv-00996-MCE -GGH Document 4 Filed 06/27/06 Page 2 of 2