Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03503/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-03503-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. CV-09-3503 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE MEDIATION

SINGLETON LAW GROUP 

Jason K. Singleton (Cal Bar. No. 166170) 

Richard E. Grabowski (Cal. Bar. No. 236207) 

611 “L” Street, Suite A 

Eureka, CA 95501 

Telephone (707) 441-1177 

Facsimile (707) 441-1533 

jason@singletonlawgroup.com 

rgrabowski@singletonlawgroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

KRONENBERGER BURGOYNE, LLP 

Henry M. Burgoyne, III (Cal. Bar No. 203748) 

Karl S. Kronenberger (Cal. Bar No. 226112) 

Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (Cal. Bar No. 222187) 

150 Post Street, Suite 520

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Telephone: (415) 955-1155 

Facsimile: (415) 955-1158 

hank@KBInternetlaw.com 

karl@KBInternetlaw.com

jeff@KBInternetlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ASIS INTERNET SERVICES, et al.

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

SUBSCRIBERBASE INC., et al.,

 Defendants. 

Case No. CV-09-3503 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

PARTIES TO COMPLETE MEDIATION 

Case 3:09-cv-03503-SC Document 34 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. CV-09-3503 

1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE MEDIATION

 WHEREAS on May 7, 2010 the Court referred this action to mediation; 

 WHEREAS on May 19, 2010 the Court appointed Karen Boyd as the mediator 

assigned to this action; 

 WHEREAS under Local ADR Rule 6-4(b), the deadline for conducting the 

mediation is August 5, 2010; 

 WHEREAS the parties believe that additional time to conduct discovery would 

increase the usefulness of the mediation and the likelihood of resolution of this action at 

mediation; 

 WHEREAS the parties and the mediator have conferred about their availability to 

conduct the mediation in September or October of 2010, and both the parties and the 

mediator have confirmed they are available on certain dates during these months;

NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AND STIPULATE AND REQUEST 

THAT THE COURT ORDER: 

 The deadline for the parties to conduct a mediation of this action is continued to 

October 29, 2010.

Dated June 14, 2010 

THE SINGLETON LAW GROUP 

By:____s/Jason K. Singleton__________

Jason K. Singleton 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DATED: June 14, 2010

KRONENBERGER BURGOYNE, LLP 

By:____s/ Henry M. Burgoyne, III 

 Henry M. Burgoyne, III 

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:____________

________________________________

Honorable Samuel Conti 

United States District Court Judge

June 15, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:09-cv-03503-SC Document 34 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 2