Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00897/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00897-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON DAVID YONAI,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0897 LKK KJM P

vs.

MR. ALLISON, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ

of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 25, 2006, the court recommended that

this action be dismissed because it appeared to the court, from petitioner’s habeas application, 

that petitioner failed to exhaust state court remedies with respect to his claims. On November 3,

2006, petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations in which petitioner

indicates that he did exhaust state court remedies with respect to his claims. Good cause

appearing, the court will give petitioner thirty days to file an amended application for writ of

habeas corpus to allow petitioner to demonstrate that he has exhausted state court remedies with

respect to his claims. If petitioner fails to do this, this action will be dismissed.

Petitioner also asks that this action be assigned to different judges. Petitioner

states no valid law or any appropriate facts in support of his request. It will be denied.

Case 2:06-cv-00897-LKK -KJM Document 20 Filed 11/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The court’s October 25, 2006 findings and recommendations are vacated.

2. Petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed.

3. Petitioner is granted thirty days within which to file an amended habeas

application on the form to be provided by the Clerk of the Court. Petitioner must demonstrate in

his amended application that he has exhausted state court remedies with respect to his claims. 

Petitioner’s failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed.

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the court’s formapplication for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

5. Petitioner’s November 8, 2006 request that this action be transferred to another

District Court and Magistrate Judge is denied. 

DATED: November 29, 2006. 

1

yona0897.111

Case 2:06-cv-00897-LKK -KJM Document 20 Filed 11/30/06 Page 2 of 2