Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03923-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PARTIAL 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS

Case No. C04-03923 MMC

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) – griley@omm.com

MARK E. MILLER (S.B. #130200) – markmiller@omm.com

PETER OBSTLER (S.B. #171623) – pobstler@omm.com

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO (S.B. #208606) – ccatalano@omm.com

LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) – lsimmons@omm.com

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street

San Francisco, California 94111-3305

Telephone: (415) 984-8700

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff and CounterDefendant,

v.

MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC., 

a Delaware Corporation

Defendant and 

Counterclaimant.

Case No. C04-03923 MMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING AND 

HEARING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF

SYNOPSYS, INC.’S MOTIONS FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION TO 

MAINTAIN THE STATUS QUO TO 

PRESERVE THE POSSIBILITY OF 

EQUITABLE RELIEF AND FOR 

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO 

DISMISS MAGMA’S 

COUNTERCLAIMS AND 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES UNDER 

ESTOPPEL BY CONTRACT

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 387 Filed 08/12/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

1

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PARTIAL 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS

Case No. C04-03923 MMC

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendant and Counterclaimant Magma

Design Automation, Inc. (“Magma”) and Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Synopsys, Inc. 

(“Synopsys”) as follows:

WHEREAS, Synopsys filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction to Maintain the Status 

Quo to Preserve the Possibility of Equitable Reliefand a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

to Dismiss Magma’s Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses under Estoppel by Contract 

(“Motions”) on July 29, 2005;

WHEREAS, Magma’s oppositions to the Motions are currently due on or before August

12, 2005;

WHEREAS, at the request of the Hon. Maxine M. Chesney, the parties are attempting to 

resolve the issues raised by the Motion for Preliminary Injunction;

WHEREAS, the parties require additional time to reach such a resolution; 

WHEREAS, Synopsys and Magma have agreed that the hearing on the Motions,

scheduled for September 9, 2005 at 9:00 a.m., should be continued;

WHEREAS Synopsys and Magma have agreed that the time for Magma to file and serve 

its oppositions to the Motions should be extended to September 2, 2005;

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties hereby stipulate as 

follows:

The hearing on Synopsys’s Motions is continued from September 9, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. to 

September 30, 2005 at 9:00 a.m.; and

Magma shall file and serve its oppositions to the Motions on or before September 2, 2005; 

and

Synopsys shall file and serve it replies in support of the Motions on or before September 

9, 2005.

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 387 Filed 08/12/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PARTIAL 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS

Case No. C04-03923 MMC

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: August 11, 2005

GEORGE A. RILEY

MARK E. MILLER

PETER OBSTLER

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO

LUANN L. SIMMONS

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Mark E. Miller

Mark E. Miller

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant MAGMA DESIGN 

AUTOMATION, INC.

Dated: August 11, 2005

CHRIS SCOTT GRAHAM

MICHAEL N. EDELMAN

DECHERT LLP

By: /s/ Chris Scott Graham

Chris Scott Graham

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterDefendant SYNOPSYS, INC.

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from Chris Scott Graham.

Dated: August 11, 2005

GEORGE A. RILEY

MARK E. MILLER

PETER OBSTLER

CHRISTOPHER D. CATALANO

LUANN L. SIMMONS

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Mark E. Miller

Mark E. Miller

Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaimant MAGMA DESIGN 

AUTOMATION, INC.

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 387 Filed 08/12/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PARTIAL 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS

Case No. C04-03923 MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

United States District Judge

, with the exception that the hearing on 

the two motions will be September 23, 2005 at 9:00 a.m.

August 12, 2005

Case 3:04-cv-03923-MMC Document 387 Filed 08/12/05 Page 4 of 4