Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-01518/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-01518-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiffs Terrance Marsh and Gisele Marsh (“Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, filed this civil 

action on October 24, 2023. (Doc. 1). Neither Plaintiff has paid the $402.00 filing fee, but each 

Plaintiff has filed a request for waiver of court fees on what appears to be a form used by California 

state courts. (Docs. 2-3). On October 30, 2023, the Court issued an order providing Plaintiffs thirtydays to complete the Court’s standard in forma pauperis forms, or in the alternative pay the $402.00 

filing fee for this action. (Doc. 4). Plaintiffs were forewarned failure to comply with this order will 

result in dismissal of this action. Id. at 2. 

The thirty-day period has expired, and Plaintiffs have failed to pay the filing fee, submit the 

IFP forms, or otherwise respond to the Court’s order. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED 

to randomly assign a district judge to this case.

TERRANCE MARSH, et al.

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONS DIRECT MORTGAGE., et al.

Defendant.

Case No. 1:23-cv-01518-CDB

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT 

THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE

(Doc. 4)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 

ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

21-DAY DEADLINE

Case 1:23-cv-01518-KES-CDB Document 6 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

And IT IS RECOMMENDED that:

1. This action be dismissed, without prejudice, for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914 or to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915; and

2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case.

In the event Plaintiffs timely file proper in forma pauperis applications or pay the filing fee, 

the Court will vacate these findings and recommendations. 

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States district judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiffs may file written objections 

with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 

Recommendations.” Plaintiffs are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may 

result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) 

(citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 22, 2023 ___________________ _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:23-cv-01518-KES-CDB Document 6 Filed 12/22/23 Page 2 of 2