Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01190/USCOURTS-cand-5_16-cv-01190-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

---

Case No. 16-cv-01190-NC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS KEITH PIGULA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Defendant.

Case No.16-cv-01190-NC 

ORDER FOR STIPULATED

STATEMENT OF FACTS

As set forth in the Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions (Dkt. No. 

3), this matter will be deemed submitted for decision without oral argument based on the 

parties’ motions for summary judgment and/or remand. In connection with their motions, 

the parties shall file either a joint statement or separate statements of the Administrative 

Record, summarizing: (1) the procedural history of the case; (2) testimonial evidence from 

the hearing(s) before the Administrative Law Judge; and (3) all relevant medical evidence 

of record. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer within 21 days 

of service of Defendant’s answer for the purpose of determining whether they are able to 

file a joint statement of the Administrative Record or whether it is necessary for the parties 

to file separate statements.

//

Case 5:16-cv-01190-NC Document 8 Filed 04/28/16 Page 1 of 3
Case No.16-cv-01190-NC 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

A. Joint Statement of the Administrative Record

If the parties are able to agree on a joint statement of the Administrative Record, the 

statement shall be signed by both parties and filed by the same deadline as Plaintiff’s 

motion for summary judgment or for remand. Each fact must be set forth in a separately 

numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where the 

fact finds support. 

B. Separate Statements of the Administrative Record

If the parties are unable to agree on a joint statement, they shall comply with the 

following requirements for separate statements of the Administrative Record.

1. Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of the Administrative Record 

At the time Plaintiff files the motion for summary judgment or for remand, Plaintiff

must also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting forth 

each fact from the Administrative Record on which Plaintiff relies in support of the 

motion. Each fact must be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and cite to a 

specific portion of the Administrative Record where the fact finds support. A failure to 

submit a separate statement in this form may constitute grounds for denial of the motion.

2. Defendant’s Separate Statement of the Administrative Record 

At the time Defendant files the cross-motion for summary judgment or for remand, 

Defendant must also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, 

setting forth: (a) for each paragraph of Plaintiff’s separate statement, a correspondingly 

numbered paragraph indicating whether Defendant disputes the statement of fact as set 

forth by Plaintiff and, if disputed, a reference to the specific portion of the Administrative 

Record supporting Defendant’s position; and (b) any additional facts from the 

Administrative Record on which Defendant relies in support of the motion. Each 

additional fact must be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and cite to a specific 

portion of the Administrative Record where the fact finds support.

//

Case 5:16-cv-01190-NC Document 8 Filed 04/28/16 Page 2 of 3
Case No.16-cv-01190-NC 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

3. Reply Statement of Facts 

If Defendant sets forth additional facts in the cross-motion, Plaintiff shall file a 

statement, separate from the reply brief, with correspondingly numbered paragraphs 

indicating whether Plaintiff disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Defendant and, if 

disputed, a reference to the specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting 

Plaintiff’s position. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2016 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:16-cv-01190-NC Document 8 Filed 04/28/16 Page 3 of 3