Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00356/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00356-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERICA FERRIER,

Plaintiff,

v.

GORDON & WONG LAW GROUP, 

P.C.,

Defendant.

No. 2:14-cv-00356-GEB-DAD

ORDER

On November 17, 2014, Plaintiff’s counsel filed an ex 

parte motion, in which he requests “an Order continuing the 

[November 17, 2014] motion hearing and filing deadline in this 

case[, or] in the alternative, . . . leave to file and have 

heard, a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, past the [referenced] 

Motion hearing deadline . . . .” (Pl.’s Ex Parte Mot. 1:23-2:3, 

ECF No. 18.)

Review of the ex parte motion caused the Court to 

consider whether it was intended that the November 17, 2014 “last 

hearing date for a motion” prescribed in the May 2, 2014 Status 

Order governs the withdrawal motion Plaintiff’s attorney seeks to 

file and have heard. (See Status Order 2:5-10.) Since that is 

Case 2:14-cv-00356-GEB-DAD Document 19 Filed 11/21/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

unclear, the withdrawal motion Plaintiff’s counsel seeks to file 

is not considered governed by that deadline. 

Since the relief requested has not been shown to be 

necessary, Plaintiff’s ex parte motion is denied.

Dated: November 20, 2014

Case 2:14-cv-00356-GEB-DAD Document 19 Filed 11/21/14 Page 2 of 2