Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01782/USCOURTS-caed-2_19-cv-01782-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DARON MICHAEL OLIVER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICHAEL L. RAMSEY et al., 

Defendant. 

No. 2:19-cv-01782-KJM-KJN PS 

ORDER 

 On December 23, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 

were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. That period having passed, plaintiff 

has not objected to the findings and recommendations. 

 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 

See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). (“[D]eterminations of law by the 

magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 

Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 

the record and by the proper analysis. 

///// 

///// 

Case 2:19-cv-01782-KJM-KJN Document 5 Filed 01/31/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4) are adopted in full;

2. The action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(b); and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

DATED: January 30, 2020. 

Case 2:19-cv-01782-KJM-KJN Document 5 Filed 01/31/20 Page 2 of 2