Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-01007/USCOURTS-caed-1_20-cv-01007-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties

---

-1-

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ FURTHER REQUEST TO SEAL CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS; Case No: 

1:20-cv-01007-NONE-BAM

6753652.1

Trucker 

 Huss

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

R. Bradford Huss, No. 71303

Dylan D. Rudolph, No. 278707

Catherine L. Reagan, 327702

TRUCKER  HUSS

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 788-3111

Facsimile: (415) 421-2017

E-mail: bhuss@truckerhuss.com

drudolph@truckerhuss.com

creagan@truckerhuss.com

Attorneys for Defendants

SUTTER HEALTH, THE RETIREMENT 

BENEFITS INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(FRESNO DIVISION)

In re Sutter Health ERISA Litigation No. 1:20-cv-01007-NONE-BAM

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

FURTHER REQUEST TO SEAL 

CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS

[Civil L.R. 141, Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 5.2]

Case 1:20-cv-01007-LHR-BAM Document 45 Filed 03/04/21 Page 1 of 2
-1-

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ FURTHER REQUEST TO SEAL CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS; Case No: 

1:20-cv-01007-NONE-BAM

6753652.1

Trucker 

 Huss

A Professional Corporation

One Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING FURTHER REQUEST TO SEAL

Upon consideration of the Defendants’ Further Request to Seal Confidential Documents

pursuant to this Court’s February 10, 2021 Order Granting Defendants’ Request to Seal 

Confidential Documents (Dkt. 34), Civil Local Rule 141, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, 

the request is hereby GRANTED. The portions of Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Reply 

Brief”) identified in Defendants’ Further Request to Seal Confidential Documents shall remain 

sealed. In particular, the following portions of Defendants’ Reply Brief shall remain sealed:

Document Portion(s) of Document to be Sealed

Portions of Defendants’ Reply Brief (Dkt. 41) Redacted portions of Defendants’ Reply 

Brief at pp. 1:18; 10:12-14; 10:16-11:2; fn. 

10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2021 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-01007-LHR-BAM Document 45 Filed 03/04/21 Page 2 of 2