Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02117/USCOURTS-cand-4_16-cv-02117-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 355
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

 BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-02117-HSG 

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Peter A. Wald (Bar No. 85705) 

Marcy C. Priedeman (Bar No. 258505) 

peter.wald@lw.com 

marcy.priedeman@lw.com 

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 

Telephone: (415) 391-0600 

Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 

 Robert C. Collins III (Illinois Bar No. 6304674, 

 appearance pro hac vice) 

robert.collins@lw.com 

330 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 2800 

Chicago, Illinois 60611 

Telephone: (312) 876-7700 

Facsimile: (312) 993-9767 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DOMETIC CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CATHERINE PAPASAN, NELSON 

GOEHLE, ANDREW YOUNG, JIMMY 

BYERS, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSTON, 

RICHARD AND LEAH VOLLBERG, and 

all persons similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

DOMETIC CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:16-cv-02117-HSG 

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT 

The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Case 4:16-cv-02117-HSG Document 43 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

 BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-02117-HSG 

Plaintiffs Catherine Papasan, Nelson Goehle, Andrew Young, Jimmy Byers, Christopher 

Johnston, and Richard and Leah Vollberg (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendant Dometic 

Corporation (“Defendant”), through their respective attorneys of record herein and without 

waiving any rights, claims, or defenses they have in this action, enter into this stipulation, with 

reference to the following circumstances: 

 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Class Action Complaint on July 8, 2016, 

via the Court’s ECF system; 

 WHEREAS, the parties have not otherwise stipulated to any extension of time to answer 

or otherwise respond to the First Amended Class Action Complaint; 

 WHEREAS, Defendant’s response to the First Amended Class Action Complaint is 

currently due July 22, 2016; 

 WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have conferred and have agreed to extend the time 

for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Class Action Complaint by 

twenty-eight (28) days; 

 WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have also conferred and agreed to a briefing schedule 

for if Defendant files a motion to dismiss; 

 WHEREAS, in light of the fact that the Court granted Defendant five (5) additional pages 

for its memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss the complaint filed on April 21, 2016, 

Defendant seeks five (5) additional pages, for a total of thirty (30) pages, for its memorandum in 

support of a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Class Action Complaint, and Plaintiffs 

take no position on this request except that if it is granted, that it be reciprocal to grant Plaintiffs 

five (5) additional pages for their response to Defendant’s motion; and 

 WHEREAS, this twenty-eight (28) day extension to respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended 

Class Action Complaint, these five (5) page extensions, and the extended motion to dismiss 

briefing schedule will not affect the Initial Case Management Conference, currently scheduled 

for August 2, 2016. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties, by 

and through their counsel of record, as follows: 

Case 4:16-cv-02117-HSG Document 43 Filed 07/18/16 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

 BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-02117-HSG 

1. Defendant shall file a response to the First Amended Class Action Complaint by 

August 19, 2016 and shall be entitled to file a memorandum of no more than 

thirty (30) pages. 

2. If Defendant’s response to the First Amended Class Action Complaint is a motion 

to dismiss, and if Plaintiffs do not seek leave to file a second amended complaint 

pursuant to Rule 15 in response to such motion to dismiss, Plaintiffs shall file 

their opposition to the motion to dismiss by September 20, 2016. 

3. If Plaintiffs file an opposition to the motion to dismiss and do not seek leave to 

file a second amended complaint, Defendant shall file any reply brief by October 

11, 2016. 

4. This extension does not affect any of the dates scheduled by the Court pursuant to 

the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order, entered on April 29, 2016. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 

Dated: July 12, 2016 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

Peter A. Wald 

Marcy C. Priedeman 

Robert C. Collins III (Illinois Bar No. 6304674, 

 appearance pro hac vice) 

By: /s/ Peter A. Wald 

505 Montgomery St., Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 391-0600 

Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 

peter.wald@lw.com 

marcy.priedeman@lw.com 

330 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 2800 

Chicago, Illinois 60611 

Telephone: (312) 876-7700 

Facsimile: (312) 993-9767 

robert.collins@lw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Dometic Corporation 

Case 4:16-cv-02117-HSG Document 43 Filed 07/18/16 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

 BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-02117-HSG 

Dated: July 12, 2016 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) 

Thomas E. Loeser 

Ashley A. Bede (pro hac vice)

By: /s/ Steve W. Berman 

 

1918 Eight Avenue, Suite 3300 

Seattle, WA 998101 

Telephone: (206) 623-7292 

Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 

steve@hbsslaw.com 

toml@hbsslaw.com 

ashleyb@hbsslaw.com 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

Jeff D. Friedman 

715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 

Berkeley, CA 94710 

Telephone: (510) 725-3000 

Facsimile: (510) 725-3001 

jefff@hbsslaw.com 

LAW OFFICES OF TERRENCE A. BEARD 

Terrence A. Beard 

525 Marina Blvd. 

Pittsburg, CA 94565 

Telephone: (925) 778-1060 

Facsimile: (925) 473-9098 

TBeard1053@aol.com 

Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 

 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), counsel for Defendants has obtained the 

concurrence of Plaintiffs’ counsel, Steve W. Berman, in the filing of this stipulation. 

Dated: July 12, 2016 /s/ Peter A. Wald 

Case 4:16-cv-02117-HSG Document 43 Filed 07/18/16 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

 BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-02117-HSG 

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 18, 2016 

 The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

 United States District Judge 

Case 4:16-cv-02117-HSG Document 43 Filed 07/18/16 Page 5 of 5