Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01611/USCOURTS-cand-4_02-cv-01611-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 1 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

eMAG SOLUTIONS LLC, eMAG SOLUTIONS 

LIMITED, GREENCORP MAGNETICS PTY 

LTD., and DELTA MAGNETICS, S.A. de C.V., 

on behalf of themselves and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TODA KOGYO CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

No. C-02-1611 PJH

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CINTAS VAC, S.A. de C.V.

Plaintiff,

v.

TODA KOGYO CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting and defending this litigation 

would be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter 

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 1 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 2 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not 

confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it 

affords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal 

principles to treatment as confidential. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 

10, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order creates no entitlement to file confidential 

information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and 

reflects the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file 

material under seal.

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 

employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff).

2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 

the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 

testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or 

responses to discovery in this matter.

2.3 “Confidential” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under standards 

developed under F.R.Civ.P. 26(c).

2.4 “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or Items: 

extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” whose disclosure to another Party or 

nonparty would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less 

restrictive means. Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information may be disclosed 

only to the Parties’ outside counsel, and as permitted under Section 7.3 of this Order.

2.5 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 

from a Producing Party.

2.6 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or 

Discovery Material in this action.

2.7 Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or 

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 2 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 3 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or “Highly 

Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

2.8 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 

designated as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

2.9 Outside Counsel: attorneys (as well as their support staffs) who are not 

employees of a Party but who are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action.

2.10 House Counsel: attorneys (as well as their support staffs) who are 

employees of a Party.

2.11 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel.

2.12 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 

pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert 

witness or as a consultant in this action. This definition includes a professional jury or trial 

consultant retained in connection with this litigation.

2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 

services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; 

organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and 

subcontractors.

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 

(as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, 

excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by 

parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material.

4. DURATION

Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 

Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing.

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. To 

the extent practicable, each Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection 

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 3 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 4 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies 

under the appropriate standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection 

only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify –

so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection 

is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. If only part of a 

document contains confidential information, the first page of the document shall state: “A 

PORTION OF THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” or “A 

PORTION OF THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.”

If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items that it 

designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of 

protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is 

withdrawing the mistaken designation.

5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this 

Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, 

material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 

material is disclosed or produced.

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

(a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of 

depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” on each 

page that contains protected material. To the extent practicable, if only a portion or portions of 

the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 

protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for 

each portion, the level of protection being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”).

A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available 

for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated 

which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the 

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 4 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 5 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the 

documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, 

or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, then, before producing the specified 

documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) on each page that contains 

Protected Material. To the extent practicable, if only a portion or portions of the material on a 

page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 

portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each 

portion, the level of protection being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”).

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial 

proceedings, that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony either (1) identify on 

the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected 

testimony, and further specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY; or (2) upon review of such transcript by 

counsel for the disclosing party, if counsel notifies opposing counsel of the designation within 

twenty (20) days after counsel's receipt of the transcript by listing the numbers of the pages of the 

transcript containing protected testimony, attaching the list to the transcript, and mailing copies to 

counsel for all parties. Pending such designation by counsel, the entire deposition transcript, 

including exhibits, shall be deemed Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only. If no 

designation is made on the record or within twenty (20) days after receipt of the transcript, the 

transcript shall be considered not to contain any Protected Material. Should a receiving party 

need to disclose portions of the deposition testimony publicly (e.g., in a public filing) before the 

aforementioned twenty-day period has elapsed, it may request that the producing party conduct an 

expedited confidentiality review. Within five (5) calendar days of such a request, the producing 

party shall identify for opposing counsel which deposition transcript pages, if any, contain 

confidential information. 

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 5 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 6 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound 

by the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” 

or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as instructed by the Party or 

nonparty offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony.

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, 

and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the 

exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only 

portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent 

practicable, shall identify the protected portions, specifying whether they qualify as 

“Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent 

failure to designate qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential –

Attorneys’ Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure 

protection under this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as 

“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” after the material was initially 

produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable 

efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

6.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s 

confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary 

economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not 

waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge 

promptly after the original designation is disclosed.

6.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a 

Designating Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the 

process by conferring directly with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the 

challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not 

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 6 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 7 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to 

reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for 

the chosen designation. A challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge 

process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first.

6.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a 

confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party 

may file and serve a motion under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 

79-5, if applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the 

challenge. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that 

the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding 

paragraph and that sets forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation 

that was given by the Designating Party in the meet and confer dialogue.

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the 

Designating Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the 

material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s 

designation.

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 

disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for 

prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be 

disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. 

When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of 

section 11, below (FINAL DISPOSITION).

7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise 

ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may 

disclose any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to:

(a) Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of 

said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation;

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 7 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 8 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of 

the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation;

(c) experts or consultants (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving 

Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 

“Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A);

(d) the Court and its personnel;

(e) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation;

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure 

is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” 

(Exhibit A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal 

Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to 

anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order.

(g) the author of the document or the original source of the 

information.

7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by 

the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:

(a) Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of 

said Outside Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this 

litigation;

(b) Experts and consultants (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, and (2) who have signed the “Agreement to 

Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A);

(c) the Court and its personnel;

(d) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom 

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; and

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 8 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 9 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

(e) the author of the document or the original source of the 

information.

7.4 Nothing herein (i) shall prevent a Party from disclosing Protected Material 

to present or former officers, directors or employees of the person or entity producing such 

information in discovery, or (ii) shall impose any restrictions on the use or disclosure by a Party 

or its counsel of documents, materials or information obtained by such Party or its counsel from a 

source independent of the discovery proceedings in this lawsuit. Notwithstanding the provisions 

of this Protective Order, this Order does not restrict the right of the Party who has disclosed 

Protected Material to make such use or disclosure of its own Protected Material as it otherwise is 

lawfully entitled to make outside the scope of this litigation.

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN 

OTHER LITIGATION.

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that 

would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as 

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the 

Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) immediately 

and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such 

notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order.

The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who caused the 

subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the 

subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must 

deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the Party in the other action that 

caused the subpoena or order to issue. Further, the Receiving Party shall not produce the 

discovery material so requested until 14 days after giving such notice, unless required to do so by 

the subpoena, demand, or other legal process, in which case, the receiving party shall not produce 

the discovery material until within 1 day of the latest time legally permissible. 

The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of 

this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to 

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 9 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 10 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The 

Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking protection in that court of its 

confidential material – and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or 

encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective 

Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the 

unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, (c) 

inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this 

Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to 

Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

10. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL. Without written permission from the 

Designating Party, a Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. 

A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 

79-5.

11. FINAL DISPOSITION. Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the 

Producing Party, within sixty days after the final termination of this action, each Receiving Party 

must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all 

Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of 

reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material except for material subject to the attorney 

client or attorney work product privileges. In the alternative, the Receiving Party may destroy 

some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether the Protected Material is 

returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing 

Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty day deadline 

that identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or 

destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, 

compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected 

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 10 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 11 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all 

pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work 

product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain 

or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 

(DURATION), above.

12. MISCELLANEOUS

12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 

person to seek its modification by the Court in the future.

12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 

Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or 

producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective 

Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of 

the material covered by this Protective Order.

13. NO WAIVER OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION DEFENSE

13.1 Party’s Execution of Stipulated Protective Order. No Party shall be 

deemed to waive any defense to this action based upon the Court’s lack of personal jurisdiction 

by stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order.

13.2 Individual’s Execution of the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to be 

Bound.” No party shall be deemed to waive any defense to this action based upon the Court’s 

lack of personal jurisdiction by virtue of the fact that any person has executed the 

“Acknowledgement and Agreement to be Bound,” attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 11 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 12 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated:___October 9, 2006________ ___Peter E. Leckman________

Joseph R. Saveri

Peter E. Leckman

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & 

BERNSTEIN, LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, 30th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Phone: (415) 956-1000

Fax: (415) 956-1008

On behalf of PLAINTIFFS

Dated:___October 9, 2006________ ____Jennifer Ratner by PEL w/permission___________

Thomas Hanrahan

Jennifer Ratner

SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD

555 W. 5th Street, 40th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90013

Phone: (213) 896-6000 

Fax: (213) 896-6600 

Attorneys for Defendants TODA KOGYO 

CORPORATION and TODA AMERICA, INC.

Dated:___October 9, 2006________ _____ William M. Goodman by PEL w/permission_____

William M. Goodman

Raphael M. Goldman

TOPEL & GOODMAN

832 Sansome Street, 4th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Phone: (415) 421-6140

Fax: (415) 398-5030

Attorneys Appearing Specially for TITAN KOGYO 

KABUSHIKI KAISHA

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 12 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2 - 13 -

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:_______________________ ________________________________________

The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Judge

10/11/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 13 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

566691.2

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. C-02-1611 PJH

EXHIBIT A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

I, ____________________ [print or type full name], of __________ [print or type full 

address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the 

Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of California on [date] in the case of eMag Solutions LLC, et al. v. Toda Kogyo Corp., et 

al.; Case No. C-02-1611 (PJH). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this 

Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could 

expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will 

not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective 

Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective 

Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

Date: _________________________________

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________

Printed name: ______________________________

[printed name]

Signature: __________________________________

[signature]

Case 4:02-cv-01611-PJH Document 268 Filed 10/11/06 Page 14 of 14