Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01628/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-01628-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 245
Nature of Suit: Real Property Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

---

1

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CASCADE FOAM INSULATION LLC DOING BUSINESS AS 

CASCADE FOAM INSULATION’S MOTION FOR GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT DETERMINATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

H. BRAD DORKEN,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

DEMILEC, INC.; 

CASCADE FOAM INSULATION; 

PAUL LENNON dba PBL DESIGNS; 

and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

 Defendants.

CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-01628-TLN-CMK 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 

CASCADE FOAM INSULATION LLC 

dba CASCADE FOAM INSULATION’S 

MOTION FOR GOOD FAITH 

SETTLEMENT DETERMINATION 

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS

This matter is before the Court, pursuant to Defendant Cascade Foam Insulation LLC 

doing business as Cascade Foam Insulation’s (“Cascade”) Motion for Good Faith Settlement 

Determination. (ECF No. 29.) 

Defendant and Cross-Defendant, Demilec, Inc. (“Demilec”) has filed a Statement of 

Non-Opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 38.) Demilec states that in doing so it relied on

written representations by Daron Snopl, within his personal knowledge as the sole principal 

owner of Cascade, including but not limited to the fact that there are no other available sums 

from applicable insurance to contribute in addition to the proposed $80,000 settlement with 

Plaintiff H. Brad Dorken (“Plaintiff”). The written representations are contained in a letter 

Case 2:15-cv-01628-TLN-CMK Document 42 Filed 08/24/16 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CASCADE FOAM INSULATION LLC DOING BUSINESS AS 

CASCADE FOAM INSULATION’S MOTION FOR GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT DETERMINATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

dated June 2, 2016, and attached as Exhibit A to the Statement of Non-Opposition. (See ECF 

No. 38.)

Demilec’s non-opposition is also conditioned upon Cascade’s agreement to dismiss 

with prejudice Cascade’s cross-complaint against Demilec if the motion is granted and upon 

Plaintiff’s stipulation that the entire $80,000 settlement received on behalf of Cascade 

constitutes compensation for economic damage for which Demilec will receive 100% as a 

credit against any award or judgment against Demilec for economic loss. 

After consideration of the briefs and the Statement of Non-Opposition, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that Cascade’s Motion for Good Faith Settlement Determination is 

GRANTED pursuant to the above conditions.

Dated: August 24, 2016

Case 2:15-cv-01628-TLN-CMK Document 42 Filed 08/24/16 Page 2 of 2