Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04981/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04981-38/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARGIE CHERRY and ESTORIA CHERRY,

on behalf of themselves and all others similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

THE CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO

(“City College”) LAWRENCE WONG, in his

official capacity as President of the Board of

Trustees, MILTON MARKS, III, in his official

capacity as Vice-President of the Board of

Trustees, DR. NATALIE BERG, JOHNNIE

CARTER, JR., DR. ANITA GRIER, JULIO J.

RAMOS, RODEL E. RODIS, in their official

capacities as members of the Board of

Trustees, and DR. PHILIP R. RAY, JR., in his

official capacity as Chancellor,

Defendants. /

No. C 04-04981 WHA

ORDER REQUESTING 

FURTHER INFORMATION

In reviewing the item-by-item listing, it would be very helpful to have the following:

(i) A table of contents breaking out each campus and, within each campus,

the particular structure. For example, it would be useful to know the

page number where the Ocean Avenue Campus starts and where, within

that section, the Rosenberg library starts. In some instances, it is unclear

where the “room” referred to is, i.e., what building it is in. Please make

Case 3:04-cv-04981-WHA Document 487 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

this clear in the way you organize the table of contents. Please use

indenting to help make clear what rooms and halls, etc., are in which

building.

(ii) For each building state whether it is “existing” or “new,” separately as to

the ADA and Section 504. Treat anything built or altered on or after June

3, 1977, and prior to January 18, 1991 as “new” under Section 504.

(iii) State which set of guidelines you contend applies, if any, to the particular

structure or facility, keeping in mind that ADAAG cannot be used in one

part of a building and UFAS in another part.

The format should appear as follows (hypothetical):

Structure Page §504 ADA Guideline

Airport Campus 1

Building One 1 New Existing UFAS

Entire Campus 3 New Existing UFAS

Defendants must do so by NOON MONDAY, JANUARY 9, 2006. By the 12TH at NOON,

plaintiffs shall respond and identify each and every disagreement with the new versus existing

designation, but the page number should be keyed to plaintiffs’ submission. Plaintiff must also

state which guidelines it contends should apply consistently to any particular building.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2006 WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-04981-WHA Document 487 Filed 01/04/06 Page 2 of 2