Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-420/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

This Order Relates To:

ALL INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS

 MDL No. 1917

Case No. C-07-5944 JST

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

CERTAIN RECENT FILINGS

On February 4, 2016, the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs (“IPPs”) filed two lengthy briefs on 

the docket, along with supporting materials. See ECF No. 4370, 4373. These documents urge the 

Court to approve the pending IPP settlement and the related motion for attorneys’ fees.

The motion to which these filing relate were submitted to Special Master Martin Quinn for 

review. He has since produced a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 4351, dated 

January 28, 2016. The next step is for the Court to resolve any timely objections that are filed in 

response to the R&R. Objections are due by February 12, 2016, and responses to those objections 

are due by February 23, 2016. See ECF No. 4286 at 2. The IPPs’ recent briefs do not respond to 

any objection to the R&R, or even mention the R&R. They appear to be a rehash of the 

documents that were submitted to Special Master Quinn. It is not clear how these documents are 

intended to assist the Court in moving the case toward resolution. 

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the IPPs to SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not 

strike the briefs at ECF Nos. 4370 and 4373, and any supporting documents, from the docket. 

Any written response to this Order must be filed by February 16, 2016. No response is required, 

but if none is filed, the Court will strike the subject filings.

/ / /

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 4376 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The IPPs remain free, of course, to file a timely objection to the R&R if they wish, and to 

respond to any objections filed by other parties. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 8, 2016

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 4376 Filed 02/08/16 Page 2 of 2