Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-05993/USCOURTS-cand-3_18-cv-05993-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

CASE NO. 3:18-CV-05993-JST

ORDER GRANTING IN PART STIPULATION REQUESTING ABEYANCE OF SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL LIVINGSTON and SHARON 

MCGILL, individually, and on behalf of a 

class of similarly suited individuals, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

MITAC DIGITAL CORPORATION, a 

California corporation,

Defendant.

Case No.: 3:18-cv-05993

Hon. Jon S. Tigar

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

STIPULATION REQUESTING 

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING BE HELD 

IN ABEYANCE

Complaint filed: September 28, 2018

Case 3:18-cv-05993-JST Document 42 Filed 05/10/19 Page 1 of 2
Page 1 CASE NO. 3:18-CV-05993-JST

ORDER GRANTING IN PART STIPULATION REQUESTING ABEYANCE OF SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Having considered the Parties’ Stipulation Requesting Supplemental Briefing Be Held 

In Abeyance, the Court orders as follows:

The parties’ motion for preliminary approval pursuant to Rule 23(e) is due on July 12, 

2019. In the alternative, should the parties fail to reach a final settlement, the supplemental 

briefing required pursuant to the Order Requesting Further Briefing on Plaintiffs’ Claim for 

Trespass to Chattels (ECF No. 36) and the Order Enlarging Time to File Further Briefing on 

Plaintiffs’ Claim for Trespass to Chattels (ECF No. 40) is due on the same date, July 12, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2019

By: 

Hon. Jon S. Tigar

United States District Judge

Case 3:18-cv-05993-JST Document 42 Filed 05/10/19 Page 2 of 2