Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01673/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-01673-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 863
Nature of Suit: Social Security - DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Cause of Action: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

---

STIPULATION TO REMAND

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE, WASBN 32245

Associate General Counsel

Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

Social Security Administration

DAVID PRIDDY, ILSBN 6313767

Special Assistant United States Attorney

6401 Security Boulevard

Baltimore, Maryland 21235

Telephone: (510) 970-4801

E-Mail: David.Priddy@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLA MARIE ALVAREZ, 

Plaintiff,

v.

Martin O’Malley,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL NO. 2:24-cv-01673-CSK

STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY 

REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE 

FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO 

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED]

ORDER

IT IS STIPULATED by and between Carla Marie Alvarez (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 

Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), through their undersigned 

counsel of record, that the above-entitled action shall be remanded to the Commissioner of 

Social Security for further administrative proceedings.

Upon remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an Administrative Law 

Judge (ALJ) for a new decision and instruct the ALJ to re-evaluate the evidence of record. The 

parties further request that the Court direct the Clerk of the Court to enter a final judgment in 

favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner.

This stipulation constitutes a remand under the fourth sentence of Section 205(g) of the 

Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

Case 2:24-cv-01673-CSK Document 16 Filed 11/07/24 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION TO REMAND

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: November 4, 2024 /s/ Francesco Benavides*

FRANCESCO P. BENAVIDES

Attorney for Plaintiff

*Authorized via e-mail on November 1, 2024

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE

Associate General Counsel

Social Security Administration

By: /s/ David Priddy 

DAVID PRIDDY

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based upon the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 

42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation to Remand”), and for cause shown, 

IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social 

Security for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of Section 205(g) of the Social 

Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

DATED: November 6, 2024 

5, aval.1673.24

Case 2:24-cv-01673-CSK Document 16 Filed 11/07/24 Page 2 of 2