Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01952/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01952-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DANNY R. GARCIA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C/O HEATH, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-1952 JAM AC P 

ORDER 

 Defendants move to extend the November 20, 2015 dispositive motion deadline in this 

case. Defendants seek adequate time to file a dispositive motion on the merits of plaintiff’s 

claims after the court rules on their pending motion for summary judgment premised on 

plaintiff’s alleged failure to exhaust his administrative remedies; defendants’ exhaustion motion 

was filed on behalf of five of the six defendants. 

The court declines to vacate the current dispositive motion deadline at this time. 

However, the court will set a new dispositive motion deadline after it has reached a decision on 

defendants’ exhaustion motion. For this reason, the court will also deny without prejudice 

plaintiff’s pending motion on the merits of his claims; plaintiff may re-file his motion after the 

court has resolved defendants’ exhaustion motion and set a new dispositive motion deadline. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order, ECF No. 48, is denied without 

Case 2:13-cv-01952-JAM-AC Document 49 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

prejudice; the court will set a new dispositive motion deadline after resolution of defendants’ 

pending motion for summary judgment premised on plaintiff’s alleged failure to exhaust his 

administrative remedies; and 

 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the merits of his claims, ECF No. 45, is 

denied without prejudice to the re-filing of his motion following the court’s resolution of 

defendants’ exhaustion motion and the setting of a new dispositive motion deadline. 

DATED: November 10, 2015 

 

Case 2:13-cv-01952-JAM-AC Document 49 Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 2