Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00558/USCOURTS-caed-1_24-cv-00558-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA KRON,

Plaintiff,

v.

TYSON POUGE, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:24-cv-00558 GSA (PC)

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL 

FOR FAILURE TO FILE NOTICE OF 

CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Local Rule 183(b)

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE AUGUST 

19, 2024

Plaintiff, a Madera county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed 

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

Plaintiff was granted in forma pauperis status on May 13, 2024. ECF No. 4. At that time, 

the Court’s order granting it was mailed to Plaintiff. On May 23, 2024, that order was returned to 

the Court marked “Undeliverable, Not in Custody. Since then, more than sixty-three days have 

passed and Plaintiff has not filed a notice of change of address as the Local Rules require. See

Local Rule 183(b).

Case 1:24-cv-00558-KES-GSA Document 6 Filed 08/05/24 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Although Plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is 

Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to 

Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a 

District Judge to this matter.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. 

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

after being served with these findings and recommendations – by August 19, 2024, – Plaintiff 

shall file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 

objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2024 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:24-cv-00558-KES-GSA Document 6 Filed 08/05/24 Page 2 of 2