Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00470/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00470-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss this action. Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, Nos. 09-

15548, 09-16113, 2012 WL 2626912 (9th Cir. Jul. 6, 2012), Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108 

(9th Cir. 2003), Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 

F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the Court hereby notifies Plaintiff of the following rights and 

requirements for opposing the motion:

1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss shall be briefed in accordance with 

Local Rule 230(l). 

2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to 

Defendants' motion to dismiss. Local Rule 230(l). If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a 

statement of non-opposition to the motion, this action may be dismissed, with prejudice, for 

failure to prosecute. Local Rule 230(l) requires the opposition, or statement of non-opposition be 

filed not more than 21 days after the date of service of the motion. Id. However, Plaintiff is 

granted 21 days from the service of this order to file his opposition or statement of nonEUGENIO LUIS NOGUERAS, 

Plaintiff,

v.

OJUKWU, 

Defendant.

Case No. 1:14-cv-00470-LJO-SKO (PC)

SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER -

NOTICE AND WARNING OF 

REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

(Doc. 49)

21-DAY DEADLINE

Case 1:14-cv-00470-LJO-SKO Document 50 Filed 04/13/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

opposition.

3. Failure to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or the Local 

Rules of the Eastern District of California may result in the imposition of sanctions including but 

not limited to dismissal of the action or entry of default.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00470-LJO-SKO Document 50 Filed 04/13/16 Page 2 of 2