Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04143/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04143-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

Counsel Listed on Signature Page 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

CRYPTOGRAPHY RESEARCH, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE 

ASSOCIATION, 

Defendant.

Case No. C 04-04143 JW (HRL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING CRYPTOGRAPHY RESEARCH 

INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL VISA

INTERNATIONAL TO MAKE WITNESSES

AVAILABLE FOR DEPOSITION, PRODUCE 

DOCUMENTS, AND ANSWER 

INTERROGATORIES AND MOTION FOR 

SANCTIONS

The Honorable Howard R. Lloyd, 

United States Magistrate Judge 

*E-filed 6/22/06*

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 258 Filed 06/22/06 Page 1 of 8
 Plaintiff Cryptography Research, Inc. (“CRI”) and Defendant Visa International Service 

Association (“Visa”) submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order concerning CRI’s 

Motion to Compel Visa International to Make Witnesses Available for Deposition, Produce 

Documents, and Answer Interrogatories and Motion for Sanctions currently scheduled for hearing 

on June 27, 2006. 

RECITALS 

On May 22, 2006, CRI filed a motion to compel the production of documents, witnesses, 

and interrogatory answers by Visa.

On May 23, 2006, CRI filed a motion for sanctions against Visa. 

On June 16, 2006, Visa and CRI by and through their respective counsel met in person to 

discuss the issues presented in CRI’s motions. In view of the parties’ agreements reached at that 

meeting, as memorialized below, and in view of Visa’s agreement to withdraw its motion to 

bifurcate and stay discovery, which shall be addressed by a separate stipulation and proposed 

order, CRI and Visa agree to the following stipulated order.

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

1. Visa shall produce all non-privileged documents in its possession, custody or 

control responsive to CRI’s Request Nos. 18, 19, 22, 23, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 46, 

53, 57, 59, 60, 65, 66, 71, 75 and 85, as drafted by CRI. 

2. Visa shall produce all non-privileged documents in its possession, custody or 

control responsive to CRI’s Request No. 24 that relate generally to the security of and/or fraud 

prevention measures in Accused Products, or that relate to measures in Accused Products to help 

protect against external monitoring attacks. This request is not intended to require production of 

documents specifically limited to other security measures, including but not limited to holograms 

or signature verifications.

3. Visa shall produce all non-privileged agreements in its possession, custody or 

control responsive to CRI’s Request No. 33 unless form agreements were used, in which case 

Visa may produce representative samples of each form agreement used, along with (1) a verified 

confirmation of this fact and (2) identification of the names and addresses of the parties to such 

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 258 Filed 06/22/06 Page 2 of 8
form agreements, and the date and duration of such agreements. 

4. Visa shall produce all non-privileged agreements in its possession, custody or 

control responsive to CRI’s Request No. 47 that relate to the technical requirements for smart 

cards and/or chips that will use the Visa mark. This request is not intended to require production 

of documents related to the actual use of the Visa mark, including but not limited to size or 

positioning of the mark on smart cards. 

5. Visa shall produce non-privileged documents in its possession, custody or control 

responsive to Request No. 56 sufficient to show pricing of the accused products. This request is 

not intended to require production of individual transaction data for each use of a smart card.

6. Visa shall produce all non-privileged documents in its possession, custody or 

control responsive to Request Nos. 67 and 68 that relate to licensing policies and practices for the 

Accused Products.

7. Visa shall produce a sample of any approved smart card in its possession, custody 

or control, unless Visa has fewer than 3 of a particular smart card model in its possession, custody 

or control, in which case Visa and CRI shall meet and confer in good faith on an appropriate 

protocol for the testing and analysis of such sample smart cards. Visa shall solicit its vendors for 

sample smart cards to respond to this request, and shall provide copies of requests and responses 

sent to and from its vendors to CRI. 

8. In searching for and producing documents and things in response to CRI’s requests 

for production, including but not limited to those identified above, Visa shall interpret the terms 

“smart card” and “accused product” in any CRI request (regardless of whether the term is 

capitalized or otherwise identified as a defined term) as follows: 

SMART CARD shall mean and include a card containing a secure microprocessor 

device suitable for identification or financial transactions including without 

limitation cards substantially conforming (or intended to conform) to any of the 

IS0 7816, 10536 and/or 14443 standards, and the technology for use therein, 

provided that such card and/or microprocessor device is resistant to and/or 

contains countermeasures for EXTERNAL MONITORING ATTACKS. This 

definition specifically includes but is not limited to contactless or dual interface 

cards with chips containing countermeasures for EXTERNAL MONITORING 

ATTACKS. 

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 258 Filed 06/22/06 Page 3 of 8
ACCUSED PRODUCT shall mean any product identified in CRI’s Preliminary 

Infringement Contentions, and any other smart card designed to bear or that bears 

the VISA brand logo and/or designed to comply with or that does comply with 

VISA standards and/or specifications, provided that such card is resistant to/and or 

contains countermeasures for EXTERNAL MONITORING ATTACKS, and any 

ancillary devices as that term is defined in the CRI-VISA License Agreement. 

This definition specifically includes but is not limited to contactless or dual 

interface cards with chips containing countermeasures for EXTERNAL 

MONITORING ATTACKS. 

As used in herein, the term EXTERNAL MONITORING ATTACKS shall mean 

and refer to actual or potential attacks on the security of a smart card or 

cryptographic device through external monitoring of the operation thereof and 

shall include attacks based on power analysis and differential power analysis. 

9. Visa shall complete its production of all non-privileged documents and things in 

its possession, custody, or control responsive to CRI’s first, second, and third sets of requests for 

production of documents and things no later than September 1, 2006. 

10. Visa shall search for and produce all non-privileged documents responsive to 

CRI’s first, second and third sets of requests for production of documents and things in the 

possession, custody or control of Visa’s unincorporated regions including Visa Asia Pacific, Visa 

Central and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa, and Visa Latin America and Caribbean. 

Visa shall also provide responsive information in the possession, custody or control of its 

unincorporated regions in providing responses to CRI’s interrogatories.

11. The parties reserve their respective positions with respect to the issue of Visa 

International’s control of documents and information possessed by Visa’s incorporated regions 

(Visa USA, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe) and others, and CRI reserves the right to seek to 

compel production of such documents and information from Visa International. 

12. CRI may amend or supplement its disclosures under Patent L.R. 3-1 at any time 

prior to September 15, 2006. If Visa fails to comply with this Order by producing all responsive 

documents by September 1, 2006, in addition to pursuing any other remedies including those 

available under Rule 37, CRI may supplement or amend its disclosures under Patent L.R. 3-1, 

without objection by Visa, within 10 court days after the date such additional documents or things 

are produced to and received by CRI. 

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 258 Filed 06/22/06 Page 4 of 8
13. The parties’ mutual obligation to provide a source log for all document 

productions shall remain in effect. 

14. The parties’ shall exchange privilege logs by September 11, 2006. 

15. On or before August 15, 2006, Visa shall substantively answer CRI’s First Set of 

Interrogatories in writing to the best of its knowledge with information in its possession, custody 

or control from September 1998 through the present. For Interrogatory Nos. 1-4, Visa shall 

provide written responses and not rely on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). With respect to 

Interrogatory No. 5, Visa shall solicit its approved chip and chip card vendors in writing for the 

information necessary to answer this interrogatory, and shall produce copies of such solicitations 

and responses to CRI. In addition, to the extent it seeks to rely on Rule 33(d) in responding to 

Interrogatory No. 5, Visa shall specify in sufficient detail to permit CRI to locate and to identify, 

as readily as can Visa, the records from which the answer may be ascertained, including the bates 

number(s) for the documents on which it seeks to rely. CRI reserves the right to seek additional 

information responsive to Interrogatory No. 5 pending review of Visa’s responses. 

16. Visa shall produce Lance Johnson, Philip Yen, and Visa’s 30(b)(6) witness(es) for 

depositions. Visa shall make a good faith attempt to produce former employees Kenneth Ayer,

Stephen Schapp, Richard Hite, and Irv Wentzien for depositions. The parties shall meet and 

confer in good faith to schedule the depositions of Messrs. Ayer, Johnson and Yen, and Visa’s 

30(b)(6) witness, during the first two weeks of September 2006 (recognizing that Mr. Ayer is a 

former employee and that Visa may be unable to produce him for deposition), and Messrs. 

Schapp, Richard Hite, and Irv Wentzien during the second two weeks of September 2006 

(recognizing that Messrs. Schapp, Richard Hite, and Irv Wentzien are former employees and that 

Visa may be unable to produce them for depositions).

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / /

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 258 Filed 06/22/06 Page 5 of 8
17. In reliance on the foregoing, CRI shall withdraw its Motion to Compel and Motion 

for Sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: _______________ By: 

Honorable Howard R. Lloyd 

United States Magistrate Judge 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ Jedediah Wakefield 

One of its attorneys 

LYNN H. PASAHOW (CSB No. 054283) 

lpasahow@fenwick.com

J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB No. 176148) 

dhadden@fenwick.com 

JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB No. 178058) 

jwakefield@fenwick.com 

DARREN E. DONNELLY (CSB No. 194335) 

ddonnelly@fenwick.com 

DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB No. 223936) 

dschumann@fenwick.com 

RYAN A. TYZ (CSB No. 234895) 

rtyz@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

CRYPTOGRAPHY RESEARCH, INC. 

6/22/06 /s/ Howard R. Lloyd

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 258 Filed 06/22/06 Page 6 of 8
PEPPER HAMILTON, LLP AND

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES,

LLP

By: /s/ Laurence Z. Shiekman 

One of its attorneys 

LAURENCE Z. SHIEKMAN 

shiekmanl@pepperlaw.com 

CHRISTOPHER J. HUBER 

huberc@pepperlaw.com 

PEPPER HAMILTON LLP

3000 Two Logan Square

Eighteenth and Arch Streets

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799 

Phone: 215.981.4347 

Fax: 215.981.4750 

JOSEPH MELNIK 

melnikj@pepperlaw.com 

PEPPER HAMILTON LLP

50th Floor

500 Grant Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15219-2502 

Phone: 412.454.5812 

Fax: 412.281.0717 

DAVID EISEMAN 

davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Phone: 415.875.6600 

Fax: 415.875.6700 

Attorneys for Defendant 

VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION 

ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE

 I, Jedediah Wakefiled, attest that the signatory Laurence Z. Shiekman has read and 

approved the STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 258 Filed 06/22/06 Page 7 of 8
CRYPTOGRAPHY RESEARCH INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL VISA INTERNATIONAL 

TO MAKE WITNESSES AVAILABLE FOR DEPOSITION, PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, 

AND ANSWER INTERROGATORIES AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS and consents to 

its filing in this action. 

 /s/ Jedediah Wakefield 

Jedediah Wakefield 

Case 5:04-cv-04143-JW Document 258 Filed 06/22/06 Page 8 of 8