Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00324/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-00324-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Sutton Hatmaker 

Law Corporation 

6715 N. PALM AVENUE

SUITE 214 

FRESNO, CA 93704

1 

STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND ORDER THEREON 

SUTTON HATMAKER LAW CORPORATION 

S. BRETT SUTTON 143107 

brett@suttonhatmaker.com SUSAN K. HATMAKER 172543 

susan@suttonhatmaker.com JARED HAGUE 251517 

jared@suttonhatmaker.com 6715 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 214 

Fresno, California 93704 

Telephone: (559) 449-1888 

Facsimile: (559) 449-0177 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SIMON V. GARCIA, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION 

* * * 

SIMON V. GARCIA, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

GORDON TRUCKING, INC., a California 

Corporation, which will transact business in 

California as L GORDON; STEVE 

GORDON, an individual; BOB 

GOLDBERG, an individual; and Does 1 

through 20, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 1:10-CV-00324-OWW-SMS 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 

DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND ORDER 

THEREON 

Complaint Filed: February 23, 2010 

District Judge Oliver W. Wanger 

Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto 

Plaintiff SIMON GARCIA (hereinafter, “PLAINTIFF”), by and through his counsel of 

record, and Defendants GORDON TRUCKING, INC., a California corporation, STEVE 

GORDON, an individual, and BOB GOLDBERG, an individual (hereinafter, collectively 

“DEFENDANTS”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as 

follows: 

Case 1:10-cv-00324-AWI-SKO Document 34 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Sutton Hatmaker 

Law Corporation 

6715 N. PALM AVENUE

SUITE 214 

FRESNO, CA 93704

2 

STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND ORDER THEREON 

I. 

STIPULATION

 WHEREAS, PLAINTIFF desires to file a Second Amended Complaint in order to correct 

certain formatting errors that appear in PLAINTIFF’s First Amended Complaint; 

WHEREAS, PLAINTIFF has provided DEFENDANTS with a copy of the proposed 

Second Amended Complaint; and 

WHEREAS, counsel for both sides have conferred in good faith and hereby stipulate to 

the following: 

 1. Provided the Court approves, PLAINTIFF will file and serve his Second Amended 

Complaint, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” within five (5) 

days of the Court’s entry of an Order permitting the filing of same; and 

 2. DEFENDANTS will file and serve their Answer to PLAINTIFF’s Second Amended 

Complaint within 10 days of the filing of said Second Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: July 22, 2010 SUTTON HATMAKER LAW CORPORATION 

By /s/ S. Brett Sutton 

S. BRETT SUTTON 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

 SIMON V. GARCIA 

DATED: July 22, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF BRADLEY A. SILVA 

By /s/ Adam Smedstad 

ADAM SMEDSTAD 

Attorney for Defendants 

GORDON TRUCKING, INC., STEVE 

GORDON, BOB GOLDBERG 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 1:10-cv-00324-AWI-SKO Document 34 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Sutton Hatmaker 

Law Corporation 

6715 N. PALM AVENUE

SUITE 214 

FRESNO, CA 93704

3 

STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND ORDER THEREON 

II. 

ORDER

 Based on the above Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefor, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF shall file and serve his proposed Second 

Amended Complaint within five (5) days of entry of this Order. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS will file and serve their 

Answer to PLAINTIFF’s Second Amended Complaint within ten (10) days of the filing of the 

Second Amended Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 22, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

DEAC_Signature-END: 

ie14hje 

Case 1:10-cv-00324-AWI-SKO Document 34 Filed 07/22/10 Page 3 of 3