Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01515/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01515-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01515-WBS-DAD AND CASE NO. 2:06-CV-00049-WBS-DAD

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

THEODORE T. HERHOLD (State Bar No. 122895) 

ttherhold@townsend.com 

MATTHEW R. HULSE (State Bar No. 209490) 

mrhulse@townsend.com 

ROBERT D. TADLOCK (State Bar No. 238479) 

rdtadlock@townsend.com 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400; Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

Morgan W. Tovey (SBN 136242) 

William Ross Overend (SBN 180209) 

REED SMITH LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3922 

Telephone: (415) 543-8700; Facsimile: (415) 391-8269 

Gregory J. Vogler (admitted pro hac vice) 

Robert A. Surrette (admitted pro hac vice) 

William B. Gont (admitted pro hac vice) 

McANDREWS HELD & MALLOY 

500 West Madison Street, Suite 3400 

Chicago, IL 60661 

Telephone: (312) 775-8000; Facsimile: (312) 775-8100 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

STRYKER CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STRYKER CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

 

Case No. 2:05-CV-01515-WBS-DAD 

(Consolidated) 

SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STRYKER CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

 

Case No. 2:06-CV-00049-WBS-DAD 

(Consolidated) 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE 

Case 2:05-cv-01515-WBS-DAD Document 91 Filed 10/02/06 Page 1 of 3
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE - 1 -

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01515-WBS-DAD AND CASE NO. 2:06-CV-00049-WBS-DAD 

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s August 15, 2006 Order Regarding Case Schedule, the 

close of fact discovery is October 2, 2006; 

 WHEREAS, under the current case schedule the close of all discovery is December 1, 2006; 

 WHEREAS the parties, working together to create a mutually convenient schedule, seek to 

take depositions after the close of fact discovery on October 2, 2006; 

 THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and request that the close of fact discovery be extended 

until November 3, 2006 for the sole purpose of completing the previously noticed outstanding 

depositions of the following witnesses: 

1. Tony Pasciuto 

2. David Farah 

3. Henry Fletcher 

4. Christopher Pollock 

5. Oliver Mills 

6. Gregory May 

7. Boehringer Labs., Inc. 

8. Daniel Meaney 

9. James Evans 

10. Dylan Crotty 

11. John Lauria 

12. Brent Lalomia 

13. Jennifer Lentner 

14. David Tallon 

15. Stryker designees for Synvasive’s Third Amended 30(b)(6) Notice served on September 14, 

2006.1

 

1

 The parties are in disagreement regarding the scope of the July 12, 2006 deposition of Steven 

Reasoner and the July 26, 2006 deposition of Tom Brennan. Synvasive reserves the right to depose 

these individuals after October 2, 2006 pending the outcome of this dispute. 

Case 2:05-cv-01515-WBS-DAD Document 91 Filed 10/02/06 Page 2 of 3
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE - 2 - 

CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01515-WBS-DAD AND CASE NO. 2:06-CV-00049-WBS-DAD 

 Should any of the above named witnesses, in particular David Tallon and Daniel Meaney, be 

unavailable for deposition prior to November 3, 2006, the parties agree to work in good faith to 

promptly schedule those depositions once the witness becomes available. 

 The parties do not seek to change any other deadlines in the case schedule. 

DATED: September 26, 2006 Respectfully submitted, 

TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP 

By: /s/ Matthew R. Hulse 

 Matthew R. Hulse 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 

DATED: September 26, 2006 McANDREWS HELD & MALLOY 

By: /s/ William B. Gont (as authorized on 9/26/2006) 

William B. Gont 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 

STRYKER CORPORATION 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 2, 2006

Ddad1/orders.civil/synvasive1515.stipord.sched 

Case 2:05-cv-01515-WBS-DAD Document 91 Filed 10/02/06 Page 3 of 3