Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00857/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00857-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH D. PHELON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0857 DFL KJM P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, 

Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On March 17, 2006, petitioner was given thirty days leave to file an amended

application for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was warned that failure to file an amended

application would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not

complied with the court’s March 17, 2006 order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

Case 2:04-cv-00857-RRB -KJM Document 8 Filed 06/15/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 14, 2007. 

1

phel0857.fta

Case 2:04-cv-00857-RRB -KJM Document 8 Filed 06/15/07 Page 2 of 2