Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00080/USCOURTS-casd-3_07-cv-00080-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

cal 

1 07cv0080

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICIA E. TEAZE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipal

corporation; SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT

OF POLICE, a sub-agency of the CITY OF

SAN DIEGO;William Lansdowne; Chief of

Police of the San Diego Department of Police,

in his individual and official capacities; Police

Officers (Names and Identities of Police

Officers to be ascertained, each in his

individual and official capacities); and DOES

1 to 10 inclusive,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 07cv 80 WQH(AJB)

ORDER FOLLOWING MANDATORY

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

On December 12, 2007, the Court convened a Mandatory Settlement Conference in the above

entitled action. Appearing were Patricia Teaze, pro se and Robert Blasi, a friend, on behalf of plaintiff;

John Riley, Esq. and Michael Gomez on behalf of defendant.

The factual discovery deadline has passed.Plaintiff chose to do no factual discovery and is

principally interested in the presentation of her case through experts. The expert designation period has

also passed and plaintiff seeks leave to reopen expert designations to cover the wide variety of medical

issues asserted in this case.

Case 3:07-cv-00080-WQH-AJB Document 23 Filed 12/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K:\COMMON\BATTAGLI\CASES\Teaze\order.fmsc.d12.wpd 2 07cv0080

The case is ideally suited at this juncture for a Motion for Summary Judgment and the City of

San Diego is prepared to file such a motion by the end of January 2008. After conferring with Judge

Hayes, and in the interest of justice and economy, the Court vacates the prior Scheduling Order and will

re-issue a Scheduling Order that will place expert discovery after the ruling of the defendants motion.

The defense is ordered to file the Summary Judgment Motion no later than January 31, 2008 and

the parties will thereafter follow the amended schedule that will be issued by separate document.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 13, 2007

Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia

U.S. Magistrate Judge

United States District Court

Case 3:07-cv-00080-WQH-AJB Document 23 Filed 12/17/07 Page 2 of 2