Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-02615/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-02615-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection

---

1

15cv2615 GPC(RBB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CYNTHIA KENDRICK, individually and 

as successor in interest to her now 

deceased husband, GARY KENDRICK, 

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; SAN 

DIEGO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; 

SAN DIEGO SHERIFF WILLIAM 

GORE; SAN DIEGO SHERIFF'S 

DEPUTY STEVEN BLOCK; DOES 1-

50,

Defendants.

Case No.: 15cv2615 GPC(RBB) 

ORDER FOLLOWING EARLY 

NEUTRAL EVALUATION 

CONFERENCE, SETTING RULE 26 

COMPLIANCE AND NOTICE OF 

CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

On March 2, 2016, the Court held an early neutral evaluation conference in the 

above-entitled action. Settlement could not be reached in the case. 

 The Court discussed compliance with rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure and issues the following orders: 

1. No objections were presented to initial disclosure under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure, rule 26(a)(1)(A-D). The parties are ordered to proceed with the initial 

Case 3:15-cv-02615-GPC-AGS Document 12 Filed 03/09/16 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2

15cv2615 GPC(RBB)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

disclosure process. Any objections to initial disclosure will be resolved as required by 

rule 26. 

2. The rule 26(f) conference shall be completed on or before March 28, 2016.

3. A joint discovery plan shall be lodged with Magistrate Judge Brooks on or 

before April 7, 2016.

4. The initial disclosures pursuant to rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) shall occur on or 

before April 11, 2016. Any motions addressing disputes related to initial disclosures 

shall be filed no later than thirty (30) days following the date the disclosures were due.

The 30-day deadline will not be extended without a prior Court order; counsel cannot 

unilaterally extend the deadline. For example, ongoing meet-and-confer efforts or 

supplemental disclosures do not extend the deadline. A failure to comply may bar the 

party from filing a corresponding motion.

5. Counsel are ordered to participate in a telephonic attorney-only case 

management conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) with United 

States Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on May 5, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. Counsel for 

Plaintiff is to initiate the call. 

 Plaintiff's(s') counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all parties that enter this 

case after the date of this order. 

 Failure of any counsel or party to comply with this order may result in sanctions. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 2, 2016 

cc:

Judge Curiel 

All Parties of Record 

Case 3:15-cv-02615-GPC-AGS Document 12 Filed 03/09/16 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2