Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01896/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01896-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY, 

 

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

DR. WANG, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

NO. 1:08 cv 01896 LJOP GSA PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS 

(ECF No. 78 )

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

302.

On February 15, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied in part and granted in part. Plaintiff

requested and was granted an extension of time in which to file objections. On April 18, 2013,

Plaintiff filed a request to withdraw his motion for extension of time. No objections to the

findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Case 1:08-cv-01896-LJO-GSA Document 84 Filed 04/22/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on February 15,

2013, are adopted in full; 

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted on Plaintiff’s claim of deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs;

3. Judgment is entered in favor of Dr. Wang and against Plaintiff; 

4. This action proceeds against Defendants Oaks and Hayward on Plaintiff’s claim of

excessive force.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 19, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill B9ed48

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:08-cv-01896-LJO-GSA Document 84 Filed 04/22/13 Page 2 of 2