Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-02755/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-02755-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation

---

COOLEY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN DIEGO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1. 

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER

CASE NO. CV 09-02755 RMW (HRL) 

COOLEY LLP 

MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com) 

101 California Street, 5th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 

Telephone: (415) 693-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 

BENJAMIN F. CHAPMAN (234436) (bchapman@cooley.com)

4401 Eastgate Mall 

San Diego, CA 92121 

Telephone: (858) 550-6000 

Facsimile: (858) 550-6420 

Attorneys for Defendant eBay Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

UNIVERSAL GRADING SERVICE, JOHN 

CALLANDRELLO, JOSEPH KOMITO and 

VADIM KIRICHENKO, individually and on 

behalf of others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

eBAY, INC., a foreign corporation, 

AMERICAN NUMISMATIC 

ASSOCIATION, a foreign non-profit 

association, and PROFESSIONAL 

NUMISMATISTS GUILD, INC., a foreign 

corporation, BARRY STUPPLER & 

COMPANY, LLC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 09 02755 RMW (HRL)

EBAY INC.’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION 

TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 

TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

GRANTING REQUEST

Date: September 3, 2010 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte 

Trial Date: Not yet set 

E-File 8/5/2010

Case 5:09-cv-02755-RMW Document 138 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 2
COOLEY LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN DIEGO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2. 

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER

CASE NO. CV 09-02755 RMW (HRL) 

On July 22, 2010, this Court entered an Order (Docket #133) allowing plaintiffs five 

additional court days to file their opposition to eBay Inc.’s motion to dismiss. The Court noted 

that it would “also give defendants a similar extension for their reply briefs, if requested.” eBay 

hereby respectfully requests an additional five court days to file its reply brief. 

Dated: August 4, 2010 COOLEY LLP

BY: s/Benjamin F. Chapman_________ BENJAMIN F. CHAPMAN (234436) 

Attorneys for eBay Inc. 

PROPOSED ORDER

 Defendant eBay Inc.’s request for five additional court days to file its reply in support of 

its motion to dismiss is granted. eBay’s reply brief shall be filed no later than August 20, 2010. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated ________________________, 2010 ___________________________________ 

 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

 United States District Judge 

August 5

Case 5:09-cv-02755-RMW Document 138 Filed 08/05/10 Page 2 of 2