Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-02258/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-02258-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CORY HOCH,

Plaintiff,

v.

STEPHEN MAYBERG, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:10-cv-02258 AWI DLB PC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 

SANZBERRO’S REQUEST TO AMEND 

DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER 

[ECF No. 70]

ORDER AMENDING DISCOVERY AND 

SCHEDULING ORDER

[ECF No. 69]

Plaintiff Cory Hoch (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on December 6, 2010. This action is 

proceeding on Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, filed May 1, 2010, against Defendant Sanzberro 

for violation of the Fourth Amendment. On November 7, 2014, the Court issued a discovery and 

scheduling order. The order directed Defendant Sanzberro to produce information from the 

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) and to take the deposition of 

Plaintiff at CDCR. On November 12, 2014, Defendant Sanzberro filed the instant request to amend 

the discovery and scheduling order to reflect the fact that Defendant Sanzberro was employed by the 

Department of State Hospitals at Coalinga State Hospital, not by the CDCR, and Plaintiff Hock was 

a civil detainee housed at Coalinga State Hospital, not a CDCR facility.

Good cause having been presented, and good cause appearing therefor, Defendant 

Sanzberro’s request is GRANTED. The discovery and scheduling order is amended to omit the 

Case 1:10-cv-02258-AWI-DLB Document 71 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

direction to produce information related to “inmates” and to CDCR, and to take depositions at a 

“correctional” facility. (ECF No. 69 at 1:27, 2:8, 2:15, 2:20, 3:11.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 13, 2014 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-02258-AWI-DLB Document 71 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 2