Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05472/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-05472-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD OLIVER, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

ANTHONY LAMARQUE, )

)

Respondent. )

 ) 

1:02-cv-05472-OWW-TAG HC 

 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 17)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. 

On August 29, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendations

recommending that the petition be denied on its merits. (Doc. 17). The Report and

Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be

filed within thirty days from the date of service of that order. After being granted two extensions of

time by the Court, Petitioner timely filed his objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendations on December 21, 2005. (Doc. 30). 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections,

the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations are supported by the

Case 1:02-cv-05472-OWW -TAG Document 33 Filed 01/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate

Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations issued August 29, 2005 (Doc. 17), are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DENIED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-05472-OWW -TAG Document 33 Filed 01/05/06 Page 2 of 2