Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02569/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02569-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2007\2569\orderreletter1.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLIFFORD COOK,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY,

et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 07-02569 CRB

ORDER

The Court is in receipt of a November 13, 2007 letter from plaintiff’s counsel. If

plaintiff believes he has not had the opportunity to conduct discovery necessary to defeat

defendants’ proposed motion for summary judgment, plaintiff may file a Rule 56(f) affidavit. 

The Court encourages defendants to cooperate with plaintiff in the conduct of discovery in

order to avoid a Rule 56(f) delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 19, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-02569-CRB Document 26 Filed 11/19/07 Page 1 of 1