Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02361/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02361-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ONE-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF 

STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649

DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825

ASHOK RAMANI - #200020

710 Sansome Street

San Francisco, CA 94111-1704

Telephone: (415) 391-5400

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant,

NETFLIX, INC.

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP

MARSHALL B. GROSSMAN - #35958

WILLIAM J. O’BRIEN - #99526

TONY D. CHEN - #176635

DOMINIQUE N. THOMAS - #231464

The Water Garden

1620 26th Street

Fourth Floor, North Tower

Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060

Telephone: 310-907-1000

Facsimile: 310-907-2000

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 

BLOCKBUSTER INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, DOES 1-50,

Defendant.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case No. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR ONE-DAY EXTENSION OF 

TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF 

STIPULATION REGARDING 

DISCOVERY DISPUTES

Hearing Date: Jan. 12, 2007

Time: 9:30 A.M.

Courtroom: A, 15th Floor

Magistrate Judge: Joseph C. Spero

Complaint Filed: April 4, 2006

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 110 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ONE-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF 

STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, Netflix, Inc., and Defendant and 

Counterclaimant, Blockbuster Inc., through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate 

and agree as follow: 

1. It was previously stipulated and ordered that the parties file by December 

14, 2006, a stipulation detailing the orders that they agree the Court should make on (a) Netflix’s 

pending motion to compel further responses from Blockbuster to Netflix’s First Set of Requests 

for Production, (b) Netflix’s pending motion for a protective order as to certain Blockbuster 

document subpoenas to third-parties, and (c) Blockbuster’s pending motion to compel further 

responses from Netflix to Blockbuster’s First Set of Requests for Production, along with a 

description of whatever issues remain for decision by the Court regarding those motions. These 

three motions are currently scheduled for hearing on January 12, 2007. 

2. Counsel for Netflix and Blockbuster conducted an additional in-person 

conference about these motions on December 8, 2006, and have been working diligently to 

resolve the outstanding issues. The parties have now reached agreement on the large majority of 

these issues, and there appears to be a serious prospect that they will be able to resolve every 

such issue. However, unanticipated complexities have arisen late in the process of trying to 

define and document a mutually satisfactory resolution of the few remaining issues, and counsel

are unexpectedly finding themselves unable to complete the stipulation before midnight 

December 14, 2006. 

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 110 Filed 12/15/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ONE-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF 

STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)

3. The parties therefore stipulate and respectfully request that the time for 

filing of the stipulation referred to above be extended one day to December 15, 2006.

Dated: December 14, 2006 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

By: /S/

Eugene Paige

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counte/claim Defendant,

NETFLIX, INC.

Dated: December 14, 2006 ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP

By: /S/

William J. O’Brien

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 

BLOCKBUSTER INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT SO ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________

HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

December 15, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 110 Filed 12/15/06 Page 3 of 3