Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05330/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-05330-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DSS Technology Management, Inc., CASE NO. C-14-05330-HSG

Plaintiff, 

 

v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Apple, Inc.,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 

Court Processes:

 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is 

appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an 

ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) 

Private Process:

ý Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private Mediation

_____________________________________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order 

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 

ý other requested deadline After the Court’s Claim Construction Order is issued.

Dated: 4/13/2015 /s/ Chris Joe Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: 4/13/2015 /s/ Jeremiah A. Armstrong Attorney for Defendant

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5.1, I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this 

document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a “conformed” signature 

(/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence for 

subsequent production for the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request. I hereby attest 

that all other signatories listed concur in the content and have authorized this filing.

Dated: 4/13/2015 /s/ Jeremiah A. Armstrong Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case 4:14-cv-05330-HSG Document 116 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER

 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

 The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket 

Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11

Page 2 of 2

X

The parties shall conduct private mediation by July 17, 2015. If the Court does not issue a 

claim construction order by June 19, 2015, the Court will reset the mediation deadline. 4/14/2015 Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Case 4:14-cv-05330-HSG Document 116 Filed 04/14/15 Page 2 of 2