Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00524/USCOURTS-caed-2_17-cv-00524-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:6901 Resource &amp; Recovery Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES 

Gregory J. Newmark (SBN: 190488) 

gnewmark@meyersnave.com 

Shiraz D. Tangri (SBN: 203037) 

stangri@meyersnave.com 

Vidya Venugopal (SBN: 310172) 

vvenugopal@meyersnave.com 

MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 

707 Wilshire Blvd., 24th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (213) 626-2906 

Facsimile: (213) 626-0215 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF VACAVILLE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF VACAVILLE, 

Defendant. 

 Case No. 2:17-cv-00524-KJM-KJN 

ORDER PARTIALLY DISMISSING 

CLAIMS

Trial Date: Vacated 

The Court, having considered Plaintiff California River Watch (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant 

City of Vacaville’s (“Defendant” or “Vacaville”) stipulation for partial dismissal of Plaintiff’s 

claims in this action, and good cause appearing therefor, HEREBY ORDERS THAT: 

(1) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), any and all claims, contentions 

allegations or assertions by Plaintiff that Vacaville has violated the Resource Conservation and 

Recovery Act (RCRA) in connection with the discharge or release of water from Defendant’s 

potable water system into the environment are HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 

(2) This dismissal obviates the need for the Court to rule on Plaintiff’s claims 

regarding an alleged endangerment to the environment in resolving the Parties pending crossmotions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 40 and 51); and, 

Case 2:17-cv-00524-KJM-KJN Document 78 Filed 02/10/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES 

(3) Except as specifically provided in their Settlement Agreement and Release, the 

Parties will each bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with the claims dismissed 

in this stipulation. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: February 7, 2020 

Case 2:17-cv-00524-KJM-KJN Document 78 Filed 02/10/20 Page 2 of 2