Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01546/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01546-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 In fact on March 26, 2007, the Report and Recommendation was returned to the Court with a notation 1

“NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED.” (Court Doc. 10.) Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f) each party is under

a continuing duty to inform the Court of any change of address. Absent such notice, service of documents at the

prior address of record of the party is effective service. Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD LEONARD,

Petitioner,

v.

SCRIBNER, WARDEN, et.al.,

Respondent.

 /

CV F 06-1546 LJO DLB HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

[Doc. 9] 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

 On February 27, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED for failure to

prosecute. The Report and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. Over

thirty (30) days have passed and no party has filed objections. 

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the

Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Case 1:06-cv-01546-LJO -DLB Document 11 Filed 05/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation issued February 27, 2007, is ADOPTED IN

FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action. This terminates this

action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 8, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01546-LJO -DLB Document 11 Filed 05/09/07 Page 2 of 2