Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01929/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-01929-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

PLAINTIFF AMERICAN LICORICE COMPANY’S

RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT TOTAL SWEETENERS,

INC.’S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, SET ONE

4850-8780-5217.1

1 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-01929-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Lauren M. Michals, State Bar No. 184473

lmichals@nixonpeabody.com

Scott S. Shepardson, State Bar No. 197446

sshepardson@nixonpeabody.com

Shady E Joulani, State Bar No. 287910

sjoulani@nixonpeabody.com

NIXON PEABODY LLP

One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111-3600

Tel: 415-984-8200

Fax: 415-984-8300

Attorneys for Plaintiff

AMERICAN LICORICE COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMERICAN LICORICE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

TOTAL SWEETENERS, INC. dba BATORY

FOODS, INC. and DOES 1 through 10

Inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:13-cv-01929-EMC

JOINT STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF

AMERICAN LICORICE COMPANY’S

RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT

TOTAL SWEETENERS, INC.’S

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, SET

ONE

TOTAL SWEETENERS, INC., individually

and doing business as BATORY FOODS,

Third-party Plaintiff,

vs.

SAVANNAH SUGAR REFINERY, a

subsidiary of IMPERIAL SUGAR

COMPANY; IMPERIAL SUGAR

COMPANY; IMPERIAL DISTRIBUTING,

INC.; DOMINO FOODS, INC.; and ROES 1

through 10, inclusive,

Third-party Defendants.

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

Courtroom: 5

Case 3:13-cv-01929-EMC Document 115 Filed 02/17/15 Page 1 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

PLAINTIFF AMERICAN LICORICE COMPANY’S

RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT TOTAL SWEETENERS,

INC.’S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, SET ONE

4850-8780-5217.1

2 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-01929-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff American Licorice Company (hereafter

“Plaintiff”) and Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Total Sweeteners, Inc., individually and

doing business as Batory Foods, Inc. (hereafter “Defendant”) by and through their respective

counsel enter into the following stipulation:

WHEREAS, Defendant’s counsel contends it served on Plaintiff’s counsel Defendant

Total Sweeteners, Inc.’s Requests for Admissions, Set One, on June 6, 2014.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has no record of receiving Defendant’s Requests for Admissions,

Set One, until counsel for Defendant contacted counsel for Plaintiff by e-mail regarding the same

on or about November 25, 2014.

WHEREAS, Defendant provided Plaintiff with proof of service, and confirmed that other

parties had received the Requests for Admission at issue.

WHEREAS, after meeting and conferring, Plaintiff responded to Defendant’s Requests

for Admissions, Set One, on December 31, 2014, despite having no record of being formally

served with this set of Requests for Admission.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have met and conferred regarding the status of

Defendant’s Requests for Admissions, Set One.

THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate that Plaintiff is not deemed to have

admitted, any of the matters contained in Defendant’s Requests for Admissions, Set One as a

result of failure to respond to that discovery.

THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate that the operative responses and

objections to Defendant’s Requests for Admissions, Set One, are those that were served on

Defendant on December 31, 2014.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Case 3:13-cv-01929-EMC Document 115 Filed 02/17/15 Page 2 of 3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

PLAINTIFF AMERICAN LICORICE COMPANY’S

RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT TOTAL SWEETENERS,

INC.’S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, SET ONE

4850-8780-5217.1

3 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-01929-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: February 12, 2015 NIXON PEABODY LLP

By: /s/ Shady E. Joulani

Lauren M. Michals

Scott S. Shepardson

Shady E Joulani

Attorneys for Plaintiff

AMERICAN LICORICE COMPANY

Dated: February 12, 2015 GORDON & REES LLP

By: /s/ Richard R. Ames

Mordecai D. Boone

Richard Ames

Attorneys for Defendant

TOTAL SWEETENERS, INC.,

individually and doing business as

BATORY FOODS

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/17/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-01929-EMC Document 115 Filed 02/17/15 Page 3 of 3