Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01218/USCOURTS-caed-2_01-cv-01218-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVERETT L. McCOY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-01-1218 DFL GGH P

vs.

CAL. A. TERHUNE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On December 12, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff’s

November 10, 2005, motion for the appointment of counsel and October 21, 2005, request to stay

proceedings, construed as a request pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f).

On December 27, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to file a

request for reconsideration of this order. On January 19, 2006, the court granted plaintiff’s

request for extension of time. On January 25, 2006, plaintiff filed his request for reconsideration. 

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that

it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

///// 

/////

Case 2:01-cv-01218-JAM-GGH Document 125 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed December 12, 2005, is affirmed. 

DATED: 8/4/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:01-cv-01218-JAM-GGH Document 125 Filed 08/07/06 Page 2 of 2