Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05437/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05437-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Local Rule 56-260(c) provides: “Any party opposing a motion for summary judgment or summary 1

adjudication shall reproduce the itemized facts in the Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit those facts that are

undisputed and deny those that are disputed, including with each denial a citation to the particular portions of any

pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory answer, admission or other document relied upon in support of that

denial. The opposing party may also file a concise “Statement of Disputed Facts,” and the source thereof in the

record, of all additional material facts as to which there is a genuine issue precluding summary judgment or

adjudication. The opposing party shall be responsible for the filing with the Clerk of all evidentiary documents cited

in the opposing papers.” 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL L. HUGHES,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHERMAN, et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 04-5437 OWW SMS P 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A

OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT (Doc. 39.) 

Michael L. Hughes (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On January 17, 2007, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff moved

for an extension of time to file an Opposition on February 13, 2007. Good cause showing, the

Court HEREBY ORDERS: 

1. Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED. The Opposition to the Motion for Summary

Judgment is DUE within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this Order. 

Plaintiff is advised that his Opposition is to comply with Local Rule 56-260(c).1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 22, 2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05437-OWW -SMS Document 41 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 1