Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00172/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-00172-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 There is reference to retaliation in connection with the delayed packages claim, but

Plaintiff does not seek reconsideration on that claim. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Gregory Lynn Norwood, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

M. Robinson, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08-00172-ROS

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff argues

the Court misunderstood the theory upon which his claim of retaliatory conduct is based. As

set forth in the Order dismissing Plaintiff’s case, “[t]here is no mention in [the administrative

grievance] materials, including the responses by prison officials, that Plaintiff believed he

was being punished for exercising his First Amendment rights.”1

 (Doc. 41). There is no

basis to reconsider the dismissal for failure to exhaust.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 44) is DENIED.

DATED this 25th day of May, 2010.

Case 1:08-cv-00172-ROS Document 47 Filed 05/25/10 Page 1 of 1