Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05748/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05748-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 Absent consent of all parties, a Magistrate Judge does not have authority to rule on

motions for injunctive relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) & (c)(1).

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

C.T., a minor, by and through 

L.T., his Guardian Ad Litem,

Plaintiff,

v.

LOS ALTOS SCHOOL DISTRICT;

CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS, and

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

EDUCTION, 

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 06-5748 PVT

ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED TO A

DISTRICT JUDGE 

On September 19, 2006, Plaintiff filed a Complaint and a Motion for Temporary Restraining

Order. This case is currently assigned to a Magistrate Judge. Thus, the court issued an order setting

September 20, 2006 as a deadline for all parties to file either a “Consent to Proceed Before a United

States Magistrate Judge,” or else a “Declination to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge

and Request for Reassignment.”1 As of September 21, 2006, none of the Defendants have filed a

Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be reassigned to a District Judge for further

proceedings. 

Dated: 9/21/06

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05748-MJJ Document 13 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 1