Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_00-md-01369/USCOURTS-cand-3_00-md-01369-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Copyright Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1154723.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

IN RE NAPSTER, INC. COPYRIGHT 

LITIGATION 

CASE NO. C-MDL-00-1369 MHP 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE 

This Document Relates to: 

UMG RECORDINGS, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HUMMER WINBLAD VENTURE 

PARTNERS, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. C 04-1166 MHP 

Case 3:00-md-01369-MHP Document 750 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1154723.1 - 1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

UMG RECORDINGS, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BERTELSMANN AG, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. C 04-1351 MHP 

JERRY LEIBER, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BERTELSMANN AG, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. C 04-1671 MHP 

CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BERTELSMANN AG, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. C 04-2121 MHP 

 WHEREAS, the Hummer Winblad Defendants filed and served their Motion To Compel 

iMesh-Related Deposition Testimony And Documents From Plaintiffs And iMesh on January 5, 

2006; 

 WHEREAS, all parties to the aforementioned motion have discussed and agreed to the 

following briefing schedule on the aforementioned motion; 

 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

1. The time for the EMI Plaintiffs, the UMG Plaintiffs and iMesh to file their 

opposition shall be January 23, 2006; 

2. The time for the Hummer Winblad Defendants to file their reply shall be January 

30, 2006. 

3. The time for hearing before this Court shall be February 9, 2006, at 2:30 p.m. 

Case 3:00-md-01369-MHP Document 750 Filed 01/24/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1154723.1 - 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

DATED: January 19, 2006 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

By:/s/ Glenn D. Pomerantz 

GLENN D. POMERANTZ 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UMG RECORDINGS, INC., INTERSCOPE 

RECORDS, and MOTOWN RECORD 

COMPANY, L.P. 

 FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER & 

 JACOBSON LLP 

By:/s/ Peter L. Simmons 

PETER L. SIMMONS 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

CAPITOL RECORDS, et al. 

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 

By:/s/ Christa Anderson 

CHRISTA ANDERSON 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HUMMER WINBLAD VENTURE PARTNERS 

et al. 

MEISTER SEELIG & FEIN LLP 

By: /s/ Jeffrey Kimmel 

 JEFFREY KIMMEL 

Attorneys for Third Party iMesh 

Case 3:00-md-01369-MHP Document 750 Filed 01/24/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1154723.1 - 3 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

ORDER 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 __1/20/2006_____________________________ ________________________________

 HON. MARILYN H. PATEL 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:00-md-01369-MHP Document 750 Filed 01/24/06 Page 4 of 4