Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05079/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05079-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HUNG D. NGUON, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

C/O CLARK, et al., 

Defendants. 

 /

1:04-cv-05079-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 14)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff, Hung D. Nguon (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On June 1, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:04-cv-05079-LJO -SMS Document 19 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 1, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action proceed on plaintiff’s failure to protect

claim against defendants Clark, Rainey, and McKain only;

3. The claims of excessive force claim, the Eighth

Amendment medical care claim, due process (inmate appeals and

property), conspiracy, supervisory liability claim are DISMISSED

from this action; and,

4. Defendants “Director of Corrections, all policy makers,

D. Adams, Lt. W.S. Wadkins, Lt. E. Smith, Lt. J. Saunders, Dr.

Kim Nguyen, Assoc. Warden Cohl, CCII Linda Smart, Cpt. J.G.

Arceo; Sgt. Cake; D. Donald Deering, M.T.A. Benjie; Linda L.

Rianda, Arline, Stephen S. Hall, Kirsten Dean, all medical staff

and correctional officers on duty on Sunday” are DISMISSED from

this action.

The instant action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge

assigned to the case for further proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2005 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05079-LJO -SMS Document 19 Filed 07/27/05 Page 2 of 2