Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01909/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01909-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Housing Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LaRELL FRANKLIN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

ALLSTATE CORPORATION et al.,

Defendant

 /

No. C-06-1909 MMC

ORDER AFFORDING PETITIONER

OPPORTUNITY TO FILE AMENDED

PROPOSED ORDER FOR APPROVAL

OF MINORS’ SETTLEMENT

The Court is in receipt of the Second Supplemental Declaration of Richard A.

Canatella, in which counsel explains that certain representations previously made to the

Court were in error. Counsel further explains that the net settlement payable to each of the

minor plaintiffs, as well as to the former minor plaintiff, is $11,250, rather than $10,000, the

total of such net payments, $33,750, representing a gross settlement in the amount of

$45,000 for such group of plaintiff heirs, which sum is equivalent to that allocated to each of

the other two plaintiff heirs, the difference in the net settlement sums reflecting a difference

in the percentages of the gross settlements allocated to attorneys fees (25% to the minor

and former minor plaintiff heirs and 33a% to the remaining two plaintiff heirs).

The above-described minors’ compromise is acceptable to the Court.

Accordingly, no later than February 1, 2008, petitioner shall submit an Amended

Case 3:06-cv-01909-MMC Document 152 Filed 01/29/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Additionally, to resolve the objection raised by defendants Scott Schwartz and

Rust, Armenis & Schwartz, (see Defendants Scott Schwartz and Rust, Armenis & Schwartz

Request for Modification of Plaintiffs’ Proposed Order Approving Second Amended Petition

at 3:10-14), petitioner shall insert in paragraph 4 of the Amended Proposed Order the

words “by plaintiffs” following the words “all claims that were or could have been made.”

2

Proposed Order Approving Minors’ Compromise, reflecting a net settlement in the amount

of $11,250 for each of the minor plaintiffs.1

 If such Amended Proposed Order is timely

submitted, the hearing currently scheduled for February 8, 2008 will be vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2008 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01909-MMC Document 152 Filed 01/29/08 Page 2 of 2