Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00698/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-00698-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INDIANA STATE DISTRICT COUNCIL OF

LABORERS AND HOD CARRIERS

PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of

Electronics for Imaging, Inc., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GUY GECHT, et al.,

Defendants.

and

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC., a

Delaware Corporation

Nominal Defendant.

___________________________________/

No. C-06-7274 EMC

(Related cases)

(Consolidated case with C07-0698 EMC)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO STAY

TRUEMAN PARISH, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DAN AVIDA, et al.

Defendants.

and

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC., a

Delaware Corporation

Nominal Defendant.

___________________________________/

No. C-07-0698 EMC

(Related cases)

(Consolidated case with C06-7274EMC)

Case 3:07-cv-00698-EMC Document 53 Filed 07/25/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 Plaintiffs have moved the Court to stay the proceedings in the above-referenced cases in

favor of City of Ann Arbor v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc. (DE CH CA2797-VCL), a similar

derivative action pending in the Chancery Court of Delaware. Plaintiffs contend that a stay is

appropriate because the above-referenced cases raise important questions of Delaware law that are

more appropriately and efficiently resolved by the Delaware courts. Defendants have submitted a

statement of nonopposition to Plaintiffs’ motion to stay.

Because the parties have effectively stipulated to a stay of proceedings, the Court hereby

GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to stay. All proceedings in this case -- including the briefing and

hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss -- are stayed until further order of the Court. The parties

are ordered to file a joint letter within six months of the date of this order to update the Court on the

proceedings in the state court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 25, 2007

 EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:07-cv-00698-EMC Document 53 Filed 07/25/07 Page 2 of 2