Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04606/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04606-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

1

CHARLES A. BONNER, ESQ. SB# 85413

A. CATHERINE LAGARDE, ESQ. SB# 209255

LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES A. BONNER

180 HARBOR DRIVE, SUITE 227

SAUSALITO, CA 94965

TEL: (415) 331-3070

FAX: (415) 331-2738

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

FRANK J. CAMBRA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK J. CAMBRA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

CHEVRON INTERNATIONAL

EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, and

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

/

Case No: C 04 4606 MMC

CONSENT TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF

LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT

All parties consent to allow plaintiff leave to file his Amended Complaint.

1. Plaintiff is Frank J. Cambra; Plaintiff erroneously named Chevron Texaco as the

defendant in this lawsuit. Plaintiff was subsequently informed by defense counsel that the proper

Chevron entity to be named is “CHEVRON INTERNATIONAL EXPLORATION &

PRODUCTION formerly known as CHEVRONTEXACO OVERSEAS PETROLEUM. “Texaco”

was dropped from the company names, and in that process CHEVRONTEXACO OVERSEAS

PETROLEUM (“CTOP”) was changed to “CHEVRON INTERNATIONAL EXPLORATION &

PRODUCTION”

Case 3:04-cv-04606-MMC Document 19 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2

2. On October 29, 2004, Plaintiff sued defendant for employment discrimination (title

VII, ADA, CA Government Code sec. 12900 et seq.); Violation of § 17200 of the Cal.Bus. &

Profession Code; Violation of Public Policy; Breach of Contract; Intentional infliction of

emotional distress; Wrongful termination; Slander; Invasion of privacy; and Negligence.

3. Defendant filed an answer on January 11, 2005. 

4. On January 27, 2005, the parties stipulated to request an order to stay litigation

pending exhaustion of defendant's internal ADR Procedures. The Court granted the order to stay

the litigation.

5. On September 23, 2005, all parties participated in a Case Management Conference,

where the issue of the wrongly named defendant was brought to the attention of the Court. On

October 12, 2005, defense counsel provided the name fo the proper Chevron entity to be named

in an e-mail to Plaintiff’s counsel.

6. All parties consent to allow plaintiff to file his amended complaint along with this

consent.

DATED: October 26, 2005.

LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES A. BONNER

By:__________/s/________________

A. Catherine Lagarde, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff

DATED: October 26, 2005.

MILLER LAW GROUP

By:__________/s/________________

Kerry McInerney Freeman, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant

Dated: October 27, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Maxine M. Chesney

Case 3:04-cv-04606-MMC Document 19 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 2