Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-02665/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-02665-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING MOTION TO TRANSFER AND VACATING HEARING

Yellin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 10-cv-02665-PJH

EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP

Sean Reis (SBN 184044)

30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

949-459-2124 (phone)

949-459-2123 (fax)

sreis@edelson.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JEFFREY YELLIN AND ELLEN YELLIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY YELLIN and ELLEN YELLIN,

on their own behalf and on behalf of all

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 10-cv-02665-PJH

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING MOTION TO

TRANSFER AND VACATING HEARING

[Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12]

Filed concurrently with:

1. Stipulated Request for Order Staying Motion to

Transfer and Vacating Hearing.

Case 4:10-cv-02665-PJH Document 18 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING MOTION TO TRANSFER AND VACATING HEARING

Yellin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 10-cv-02665-PJH

The Court, having read the Stipulated Request for Order Staying Motion to Transfer and

Vacating Hearing filed by Plaintiffs Jeffrey and Ellen Yellin and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and 7-12, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby ORDERS that:

1. Defendant’s motion to transfer is stayed pending resolution of Plaintiffs’ pending

motion to remand this case to the Superior Court of California for San Francisco

County;

2. The hearing on Defendant’s motion to transfer currently scheduled for August 18,

2010 is vacated;

3. Should this Court decline to remand this case to the Superior Court of California for

San Francisco County, the Court shall set a hearing on Defendant’s motion to

transfer, with Plaintiffs having at least twenty-one (21) days to file a brief in

opposition to the motion to transfer and Defendant having fourteen (14) days to file

its reply brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _____________________ _______________________________

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Judge

Northern District of California

7/21/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:10-cv-02665-PJH Document 18 Filed 07/21/10 Page 2 of 2