Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-02193/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-02193-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kevin A. Osborn, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Ivan Bartos, et. al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-2193-PHX-ROS (JRI)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”). (Doc. 280). 

A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has

filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district

court’s review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.”) (internal

quotations and citations omitted).

The R&R was issued January 12, 2012. No objections being made, the Court will

adopt the Report and Recommendation in full.

Accordingly,

Case 2:08-cv-02193-ROS Document 281 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 280) is ADOPTED.

IT IS ORDERED Defendants Unknown Parties (John Does and Jane Does) are

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DATED this 3rd day of February, 2012.

Case 2:08-cv-02193-ROS Document 281 Filed 02/06/12 Page 2 of 2