Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05413/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05413-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 625
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

APPROXIMATELY $61,505 IN UNITED

STATES CURRENCY,

Defendant.

 /

No. C-07-5413 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING CLAIMANT TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPY IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On January 22, 2008, claimant Frank Joseph Alioto electronically filed his Answer

and, separately, Verified Claim. Claimant has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on

the business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy

of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly

marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See

General Order 45 § VII.G; see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Claimant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

standing orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

documents. Claimant is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with the

Court’s order to provide chambers copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court may

Case 3:07-cv-05413-MMC Document 12 Filed 02/01/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any electronicallyfiled document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 1, 2008 MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-05413-MMC Document 12 Filed 02/01/08 Page 2 of 2