Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01142/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-01142-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAM MOUNTAIN CONTRACTING, CASE NO. CV F 05-1142 REC LJO

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO

vs. DISMISS ACTION

JAMES R. HODGSON, Jr.,

Defendants.

 /

This Court issued its March 23, 2006 Order After Settlement to require the parties, no later than

April 28, 2006, to file papers to dismiss this action in its entirety. Despite assurances from counsel that

the papers would be filed, no dismissal papers have been filed. This Court’s Local Rule 11-110 provides

that failure to comply with an order of this Court “may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any

and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than June 20, 2006, to show cause in

writing why sanctions, including dismissal of this action with or without prejudice, should not be

imposed for failure to comply with this Court’s March 23, 2006 Order After Notice of Settlement. This

order to show cause will be deemed vacated if prior to June 20, 2006 papers are filed to dismiss this

action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 6, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

66h44d UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-01142-AWI -LJO Document 20 Filed 06/06/06 Page 1 of 1