Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03645/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03645-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.’S TIME TO RESPOND 

TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 

DOLL 

AMIR 

&

ELEY LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GLORIA A. MESTAYER,

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. and 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03645-EMC

Assigned to Hon. Edward M. Chen 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

EXTENDING DEFENDANT 

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), 

N.A.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO 

THIRD AMENDED 

COMPLAINT 

[Stipulation to Extend Time to 

Respond to Third Amended 

Complaint filed concurrently 

herewith] 

TAC Filed: July 20, 2016 

Current Resp. Date: August 8, 2016

New Resp. Date: August 31, 2016 

Case 3:15-cv-03645-EMC Document 84 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.’S TIME TO RESPOND 

TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 

DOLL 

AMIR 

&

ELEY LLP

ORDER 

The Court has reviewed the Stipulation filed by Gloria A. Mestayer 

(“Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel of record, Clark Ovruchesky, and Defendant 

Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (“Capital One”), by and through its counsel of record, 

Johari N. Townes of Doll Amir & Eley LLP, to amend the date by which Capital One 

must respond to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, such that the responsive 

pleading shall now be August 31, 2016 (the “Stipulation”). The Stipulation is 

incorporated herein by reference. Good cause appearing thereon, the Court hereby 

orders as follows: 

Capital One’s time to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Third Amended 

Complaint is extended. Capital One shall file its responsive pleading on or before 

August 31, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ____________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

7/29/16

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-03645-EMC Document 84 Filed 07/29/16 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

i:i... 11 

>--' 

>--' 12 ~ 

"' μ.i '"" 13 

o'd 

~ 14 ~ 

;;s 

<>:: 15 

'"" '"" 0 16 0 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

( 26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles: State of California. I am over 

the age of 18 years and not a party to the within act10n. My business address is 1888 

Century Park East, Suite 1850, Los Angeles, California 90067. 

On July 27, 2016, I served the foregoing document described as rPROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT CAPITAL ONE BANK (US'A), N.A.'S 

TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT on the interested 

parties in this action by placing the original and/or a true copy thereof enclosed in (a) 

sealed envelope(s), addressed as follows: 

D 

D 

D 

D 

D 

SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST 

BY REGULAR MAIL: I deposited such envelope in the mail at 1888 

Century Park East, Suite 1850, Los Angeles, California. The envelope was 

mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am "readily familiar" with the 

firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is 

deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course 

of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is 

presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 

one (1) day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 

BY FACSIMILE MACHINE: I transmitted a true copy of said document(s) 

by facsimile machine, and no error was reported. Said fax transmission(s) 

were directed as indicated on the service hst. 

BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I caused such documents to be delivered 

overnight via an overnight delivery service in lieu of delivery by mail to the 

addressees., The envelope or package was deposited with delivery fees thereon 

fully prepaid. 

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: I transmitted a true copy of said document(s) via 

electronic mail, and no error was reported. Said email was directed as 

indicated on the service list. 

BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand to the above addressee(s). 

BY CM/ECF: I electronically transmitted a true copy of said document(s) to 

the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the aforementioned CM/ECF registrants. 

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court, 

at whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury under the 

laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. 

PROOF OF SERVICE . 

Case 3:15-cv-03645-EMC Document 84 Filed 07/29/16 Page 3 of 4
SERVICE LIST 

T:~19~ 356-8960 F: 619 330-7610 

co co awcalifornia.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Gloria A. 

Mestayer 

T: (949) 553-7547 

F: (949) 553-7539 

mdeshong(a}j onesday .com 

Attorneys for Defenaant, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Case 3:15-cv-03645-EMC Document 84 Filed 07/29/16 Page 4 of 4