Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-00815/USCOURTS-casd-3_10-cv-00815-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SIERRA WIRELESS, INC. and 

SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

NORMAN IP HOLDINGS LLC,

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. 3:10-cv-00815-JM-BGS 

ORDER STAYING CASE 

Doc. No. 25 

Having reviewed the representations of plaintiffs Sierra Wireless, Inc. and Sierra 

Wireless America, Inc. (“Sierra Wireless”), and there being a lack of opposition by 

defendant Norman IP Holdings, LLC (“Norman”), the Court finds good cause to grant 

the Unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery and Briefing, and Re-schedule Hearing, re 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss/Transfer Pending Resolution of Texas Transfer 

Motion. 

Case 3:10-cv-00815-JM-BGS Document 28 Filed 08/02/10 Page 1 of 2
-2-

 3:10-cv-00815-JM (BGS) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Therefore it is ORDERED that: 

1. Pending a decision by the Eastern District of Texas, in Case No. 6:09-cv270-LED-JDL, on Defendants’ Joint Opposed Motion to Dismiss Norman IP 

Holdings, LLC’s and Saxon Innovations, LLC’s Fourth Amended Complaint, or in the 

Alternative, to Transfer to the Southern District of California, further briefing and any 

jurisdictional discovery relating to the Motion of Defendant Norman IP Holdings, LLC 

to Dismiss or in the Alternative Transfer the Case to the Eastern District of Texas (Dkt. 

No. 21), is stayed. The August 6, 2010 hearing date is taken off calendar. 

2. Once the Eastern District of Texas issues an order on the Texas motion to 

dismiss or transfer, limited jurisdictional discovery can commence, briefing will 

resume, and the hearing will be rescheduled at the next available hearing date at least 

two months after the issuance of the order resolving the Texas motion. 

3. Should the Eastern District of Texas fail to act on the Texas motion to 

dismiss or transfer by August 31, 2010, the parties agree that the briefing, hearing, and 

jurisdictional discovery stay should immediately end unless both parties agree and 

stipulate to extend the stay for an additional time thereafter. Absent such an extension, 

limited jurisdictional discovery can commence, briefing will resume, and the hearing 

will then be rescheduled to the next available hearing date at least two months after 

August 31, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 2, 2010

___________________________________

JEFFREY T. MILLER 

United States District Judge 

_____________________________

JEFFREY T. MILLER

United States District Judge 

Case 3:10-cv-00815-JM-BGS Document 28 Filed 08/02/10 Page 2 of 2