Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00323/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00323-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 465
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2729

Attorneys for Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BHUPINDER KAUR DHALIWAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland

Security, et al.

 Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 08-CV-S-323 JAM EFB

THIRD JOINT STIPULATION AND

ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME

This is an immigration case in which plaintiff has challenged a delay in the adjudication of

his application to adjust status by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS). The parties

have previously stipulated to two previous extensions of time for the government to file its

answer to the complaint, to August 13, 2008. The parties respectfully inform the Court that since

the filing of the last extension request, CIS has issued a Request for Evidence in the matter, to

which plaintiff is currently in the process of responding. Upon receipt of the response to the

Request for Evidence, it is anticipated that CIS will be able to complete adjudication promptly. 

The parties therefore stipulate that the time for filing the government’s answer be extended to

October 14, 2008, and that any other filing dates be similarly extended to after that time.

 

Case 2:08-cv-00323-JAM-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/14/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

Dated: August 13, 2008

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/Audrey Hemesath

Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

By: /s/ Robert B. Jobe

Robert B. Jobe

Attorney for the Plaintiff

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the defendants’ Answer is due on October 14, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 13, 2008

/s/ John A. Mendez 

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:08-cv-00323-JAM-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/14/08 Page 2 of 2