Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01398/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-01398-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 12-CV-04209 RS 

Megan Whyman Olesek (CSB No. 191218) 

KENYON & KENYON LLP 

1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 210 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216 

Telephone: 650-384-4700 

Facsimile: 650-384-4701 

molesek@kenyon.com

John Flock (admitted pro hac vice) 

KENYON & KENYON LLP 

One Broadway 

New York, New York 10004-1007 

Telephone: 212-425-7200 

Facsimile: 212-425-5288 

jflock@kenyon.com

Douglas E. Ringel (admitted pro hac vice)

Yariv Waks (admitted pro hac vice)

KENYON & KENYON LLP 

1500 K Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20005-1257 

Telephone: 202-220-4200 

Facsimile: 202-220-4201 

dringel@kenyon.com

Attorneys for Defendant Lenovo 

(United States) Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., 

LENOVO (BEIJING) LTD., SHANGHAI 

LENOVO ELECTRONIC CO., LTD., 

LENOVO (HUIYANG) ELECTRONIC 

INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., and LENOVO 

INFORMATION PRODUCTS (SHENZHEN) 

CO., LTD., 

Defendants. 

Civil Case No. 12-cv-01398 RS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT 

LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.’S 

DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO 

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT

ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., 

Defendant. 

Civil Case No. 12-cv-04209 RS 

(consolidated with 12-cv-01398-RS) 

Case 3:12-cv-01398-RS Document 86 Filed 01/03/13 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

- 1 - CASE NO. 12-CV-04209 RS 

 WHEREAS, defendant Lenovo (United States) Inc. (“Lenovo-U.S.”) filed a motion in 

C.A. No. 12-cv-04209 to dismiss plaintiff Rovi Solutions Corporation’s (“Rovi’s”) claims of 

indirect and willful infringement pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) on August 31, 2012 (D.I. 8); 

 WHEREAS, the Court granted Lenovo-U.S.’s motion to dismiss on November 15, 2012 

(D.I. 34); 

 WHEREAS, Rovi filed an amended complaint on December 17, 2012 (D.I. 35); 

 WHEREAS, Lenovo-U.S.’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the amended 

complaint is January 4, 2013; 

 And WHEREAS, in light of the holidays, Rovi has consented to extend Lenovo-U.S.’s 

deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Rovi’s amended complaint until January 14, 2013; 

 It is therefore stipulated between the parties that, subject to the approval of the Court, the 

deadline for Lenovo-U.S. to answer or otherwise respond to Rovi’s amended complaint (D.I. 35) 

is January 14, 2013. 

 

Case 3:12-cv-01398-RS Document 86 Filed 01/03/13 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

- 2 - CASE NO. 12-CV-04209 RS 

Respectfully submitted, Dated: December 31, 2012 

By /s/ Joseph M. Paunovich

Claude M Stern (CSB No. 96737) 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 

Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 

Telephone: (650) 801-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 

claudestern@quinnemanuel.com

Joseph M. Paunovich (CSB No. 228222) 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 

Telephone: (213) 443-3000 

Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 

joepaunovich@quinnemanuel.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Rovi Solutions 

Corp. 

By: /s/ Megan Whyman Olesek

Megan Whyman Olesek (CSB No. 191218) 

KENYON & KENYON LLP 

1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 210 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216 

Telephone: 650-384-4700 

Facsimile: 650-384-4701 

molesek@kenyon.com

John Flock (admitted pro hac vice) 

KENYON & KENYON LLP 

One Broadway 

New York, New York 10004-1007 

Telephone: 212-425-7200 

Facsimile: 212-425-5288 

jflock@kenyon.com

Douglas E. Ringel (admitted pro hac vice)

Yariv Waks (admitted pro hac vice) 

KENYON & KENYON LLP 

1500 K Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20005-1257 

Telephone: 202-220-4200 

Facsimile: 202-220-4201 

dringel@kenyon.com

Attorneys for Defendant Lenovo (United 

States) Inc. 

Case 3:12-cv-01398-RS Document 86 Filed 01/03/13 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

- 3 - CASE NO. 12-CV-04209 RS 

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5-1

 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that the 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 

DATED: December 31, 2012 KENYON & KENYON LLP 

 By: /s/ Megan Whyman Olesek

 Megan W. Olesek 

Attorneys for Defendants Lenovo (United 

States) Inc. 

Case 3:12-cv-01398-RS Document 86 Filed 01/03/13 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

- 4 - CASE NO. 12-CV-04209 RS 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: , 2013 By: 

 Hon. Richard Seeborg 

1/3/

Case 3:12-cv-01398-RS Document 86 Filed 01/03/13 Page 5 of 5