Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-04137/USCOURTS-cand-4_08-cv-04137-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

PAUL COLLOWAY,

Petitioner,

 vs.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. /

No. C 08-4137 PJH (PR)

ORDER FOR

SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

This is a habeas case directed to a denial of parole. The Ninth Circuit has recently

decided Hayward v Marshall, in which important issues relating to federal review of parole

decisions were raised. Hayward v Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir.

April 22, 2010). It would assist the court to have briefing from the parties regarding the

impact of the Hayward en banc decision on this case. 

Respondent must send petitioner a copy of the Hayward en banc decision within ten

days of the date this order is entered. Within thirty days of the date this order is entered,

respondent must file and serve a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this

action. If petitioner desires to respond to the supplemental brief, he shall do so by serving

and filing a supplemental brief within thirty days of the date respondent’s brief is served

upon him.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 13, 2010. 

 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

P:\PRO-SE\PJH\HC.08\COLLOWAY4137.supp briefing.wpd

Case 4:08-cv-04137-PJH Document 15 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 1