Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00733/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00733-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Gilberto Acevedo is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On August 26, 2016, the Court screened and dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to 

amend for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). 

Plaintiff was provided thirty days from the date of service of the order to file an amended complaint. 

Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the order, the 

action will be dismissed for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 11.) More than thirty days have passed, 

and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the order. As a result, there is no 

pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. 

///

///

///

GILBERTO ACEVEDO,

 Plaintiff,

v.

RAY FISHER, JR.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00733-AWI-SAB (PC)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

RECOMMENDING ACTION BE DISMISSED 

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE 

CLAIM FOR RELIEF, SUBJECTING PLAINTIFF 

TO STRIKE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G)

[ECF No. 11]

Case 1:16-cv-00733-AWI-SAB Document 12 Filed 10/06/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED, with 

prejudice, for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal is 

subject to the “three-strikes” provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Coleman v. Tollefson, 

__ U.S. 385, __, 135 S.Ct. 1759, 1765 (2015). 

This Findings and Recommendation will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days 

after being served with this Findings and Recommendation, Plaintiff may file written objections with 

the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 

Recommendation.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may 

result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)

(citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 6, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00733-AWI-SAB Document 12 Filed 10/06/16 Page 2 of 2