Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-00302/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-00302-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD GLASS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-00-0302 DFL JFM P

vs.

C.A. TERHUNE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On October 27, 2005, defendants filed a motion to reconsider this court’s October

14, 2005 order granting plaintiff’s request for reimbursement for his costs on appeal. Good cause

appearing, defendants’ request will be granted. Upon reconsideration, this court finds

defendants’ objections are well-taken. Plaintiff was represented by counsel on appeal, so any

expenses incurred pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 39(e) must be sought by appellate counsel, not by

plaintiff in propria persona. In addition, defendants’ appeal was dismissed on May 11, 2005. 

Plaintiff’s cost bill was due within fourteen days from the entry of the appellate court’s order. 

Fed. R. App. P. 39(d). Thus, plaintiff’s June 13, 2005 motion for costs, brought by plaintiff in

propria persona, was also untimely and will be denied.

/////

Case 2:00-cv-00302-JKS-JFM Document 217 Filed 11/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ October 27, 2005 request for reconsideration is granted;

2. That portion of the October 14, 2005 order directing defendants to pay plaintiff

the sum of $178.50 as reimbursement for his costs on appeal is vacated; and

3. Plaintiff’s June 13, 2005 motion for costs on appeal, is denied.

DATED: November 1, 2005.

/001

glas0302.vac

Case 2:00-cv-00302-JKS-JFM Document 217 Filed 11/02/05 Page 2 of 2