Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01254/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-01254-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD DWANE BROOK,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-1254-GEB-GGH-P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, Warden, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 12, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-01254-GGH Document 80 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 12, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ December 5, 2005 motion to dismiss is granted in part and

dismissed in part as follows:

a.) Granted as to plaintiff’s claims of fraud and conspiracy and these

claims are dismissed as to all defendants;

b.) Granted as to plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985, and

these claims are dismissed;

c.) Granted as to defendant Carey, in his individual capacity only, for

money damages, and this claim is dismissed; and

d.) Denied as to defendant Carey, in his official capacity, and this matter

proceed as to this defendant on a claim for relief in the form of prospective injunctive relief only; 

3. Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code § 52.1 are dismissed; and

4. This matter proceeds only as to plaintiff’s claims against defendants under the

First and Eighth Amendments, and any supplemental state law negligence claim.

Dated: September 11, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01254-GGH Document 80 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 2