Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca10-92-07083/USCOURTS-ca10-92-07083-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 

---

~' I .u - ., 

APPEAL nit.cd Sta• _; Cr. ~r,_ n! • , · • • UNITED STATES COURT OF TG::t•.,.. · ,.-,1'; 

TENTH CIRCUIT 

TIMOTHY OWENS, ) 

) 

Plaintiff-Appellant, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

DANIEL REYNOLDS, Warden; RITA ANDREWS, ) 

Deputy Warden of Security, OSP; DANIEL ) 

NACE, Security Major, OSP; CAPTAIN STEVE) 

LEEPER; C.O. II CHARLES BRANSON; ) 

SERGEANT JIMMY QUINTON; C.O. II LARRY ) 

WATSON; C.O. I JOE ARDESE; C.O. I JAMES) 

WILLIAMS; C.O. I MARK SHERWOOD; C.O. I ) 

JAMES RICHARDS; SERGEANT BILLY COKEY; ) 

C.O. I MARK JENNINGS; C.O. I BRIAN ) 

HOLDEN; C.O. I LONNIE HUMPHERIES; C.O. I) 

ROBERT DIBBLES; C.O. I DONALD PETTY; ) 

C.O. I WHITLOCK; SERGEANT JAMES SOCKEY; ) 

C.O. I ANGIE SOCKEY; C.O. I J. JOHNSON; ) 

C.O. I JEFF PALMER; C.O. I CHARLIE ) 

WILLIAMSON; C.O. I BILL MASTERSON; C.O. ) 

I NELMS; C.O. I ROBERT ORTGH; C.O. I ) 

MARION BESS; UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL ) 

OFFICERS; C.O. I J. NOWLIN; C.O. TIMOTHY) 

TURMAN; C.O. I ROY ANDERSON; C.O. I PETE) 

UNDERWOOD; SERGEANT MIKE SIZEMORE, ) 

) 

Defendants-Appellees. ) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

SEP 2 t 1992 

OEC- r-ri- ROB~ .. T L. H .------ Ole:-_: 

No. 92-7083 

(D.C. No. CIV-91-544-S) 

( E. D. Okla. ) 

Before MOORE, TACHA, and BRORBY Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel 

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially 

* This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall 

not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, 

except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of 

the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir. R. 

36.3. 

Appellate Case: 92-7083 Document: 010110353492 Date Filed: 09/21/1992 Page: 1
assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

Plaintiff-Appellant Timothy Owens appeals from an order of 

the district court dismissing his complaint under 42 u.s.c. § 

1983. We have construed the pleadings liberally and reviewed the 

facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff-appellant, and 

agree with the district court's findings. We therefore AFFIRM for 

substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court's 

order dated May 20, 1992. The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

-2-

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

Deanell Reece Tacha 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 92-7083 Document: 010110353492 Date Filed: 09/21/1992 Page: 2