Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-304/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Master Case No. 3:07-cv-05944-SC PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND FACT 

DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

Roman M. Silberfeld, Bar No. 62783 

RMSilberfeld@rkmc.com 

Bernice Conn, Bar No. 161594 

BConn@rkmc.com 

David Martinez, Bar No. 193183 

DMartinez@rkmc.com 

2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208 

Telephone: 310-552-0130 

Facsimile: 310-229-5800 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

BEST BUY CO., INC.; BEST BUY PURCHASING LLC; BEST 

BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC.; BEST BUY STORES, 

L.P.; BESTBUY.COM, LLC; MAGNOLIA HI-FI, LLC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS 

Master File No. 3:07-cv-05944-SC

MDL No. 1917 

The Honorable Samuel Conti 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND 

FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE AS 

AGAINST THE PHILIPS 

DEFENDANTS REGARDING 

CERTAIN OWNERSHIP AND 

CONTROL ISSUES 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2937 Filed 10/22/14 Page 1 of 2
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER 

&

CIRESI L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS 

AT 

LAW

LOS 

ANGELES

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Master Case No. 3:07-cv-05944-SC - 1 - PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND FACT 

DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the deadline to 

complete fact discovery is extended up to and including November 5, 2014 with respect to 

Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Philips Electronics North America Corporation 

regarding (a) completion of the Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition regarding ownership and control issues, 

and (b) moving to compel discovery related to the Written Discovery and the Rule 30(b)(6) 

Deposition regarding ownership and control issues. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ____________________ ____________________________________ 

 SAMUEL CONTI 

United States District Court Judge 

October 22, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2937 Filed 10/22/14 Page 2 of 2