Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06222/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-06222-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL—No. C-07-06222 RMW

CCL

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 6/8/10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEL FUSE INC., ELEC & ELTEK (USA)

CORPORATION, WURTH ELECTRONICS

MIDCOM, INC., XFMRS, INC.,

Defendants.

No. C-07-06222 RMW

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL

[Re Docket No. 220]

Defendant E&E Magnetic Products Limited ("E&E Magnetic") moves to file under seal a

portion of its reply brief for its motion to dismiss as well as Exhibit A to the reply. E&E Magnetic

has represented that it seeks to file this material under seal because it has been designated

"Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Eltec & Eltek (USA) Corporation ("E&E USA"). On June

3, 2010, the court issued an order requesting E&E USA to submit an identification of the portions of

material that it feels is confidential and an explanation for why it is confidential. E&E USA has

represented that it does not object to making the unredacted versions of the reply brief and Exhibit A

available to the public, with the exception of page seven of Exhibit A, which contains confidential

information including the dates of specific activities in relation to accused products. The court

therefore grants the motion to seal with respect to page seven of Exhibit A and denies the motion to

Case 5:07-cv-06222-RMW Document 232 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL—No. C-07-06222 RMW

CCL 2

seal in all other respects. Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e), E&E Magnetic has four days to refile the

documents in a manner that conforms to this order. 

DATED: 6/8/10

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:07-cv-06222-RMW Document 232 Filed 06/08/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL—No. C-07-06222 RMW

CCL 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

Juanita R. Brooks brooks@fr.com 

Limin Zheng zheng@fr.com 

John Cameron Adkisson jca@fr.com 

Michael J Kane kane@fr.com 

Michael J. Pape pape@fr.com 

William R. Woodford woodford@fr.com 

Counsel for Defendants:

Joshua L. Raskin jraskin@wolfblock.com 

Andrew P. Nemiroff anemiroff@cozen.com 

Martin C. Fliesler mcf@fdml.com 

Martin G. Raskin mraskin@cozen.com 

Rex Hwang rhwang@fdml.com 

Kent Andrew Lambert klambert@bakerdonelson.com 

Michael Joseph Powell mpowell@bakerdonelson.com 

Samuel F Miller smiller@bakerdonelson.com 

Sarah Katherine Casey skcasey@bakerdonelson.com 

Terry John Mollica tjm@cmlawoffices.com 

Harold C. Moore hcmoore@maginot.com 

Christopher Todd Norris todd.norris@bullivant.com 

David Moorman drmoorman@maginot.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 6/8/10 CCL

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:07-cv-06222-RMW Document 232 Filed 06/08/10 Page 3 of 3