Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01963/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-01963-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TOM BAUSER, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB

RELATED CASE ORDER 

Related to Nos.: 

2:13-CV-02439 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV-01946 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV—01957 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV-01960 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV-01961 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV-01963 JAM-EFB 

2:14-CV—01965 JAM-EFB 

2:15-CV-00429 JAM-EFB 

2:15-CV-00622 JAM-EFB 

2:15-CV-00623 JAM-EFB 

2:15-CV-02150 JAM-EFB 

1:15-CV-01721 JAM-EFB 

1:15-CV-01748 JAM-EFB 

MIKE CAMPBELL, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 2:15-CV-02396 JAM-CMK

BRYCE WILLIAMS, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

 

Defendants.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 1:15-CV-01874 JAM-SAB

Case 2:14-cv-01963-JAM-EFB Document 34 Filed 01/20/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2 

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these 

actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 

2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same 

judge and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial 

savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for 

the parties. 

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under 

Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are 

assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation 

of the actions is effected. Under the regular practice of this 

court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and 

magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge assignment 

in the actions denominated 2:15-CV-02396 JAM-CMK and 1:15-CV-01874 

JAM-SAB be reassigned to Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all 

further proceedings. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in 

the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:15-CV-02396 JAM-EFB and 

1:15-CV-01874 JAM-EFB. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 19, 2016 

 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ 

 JOHN A. MENDEZ 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:14-cv-01963-JAM-EFB Document 34 Filed 01/20/16 Page 2 of 2