Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-289/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 07-5944 

REGARDING SCHEDULING MDL NO. 1917 

Michael P. Kenny (mike.kenny@alston.com) 

Debra D. Bernstein (debra.bernstein@alston.com) 

Matthew D. Kent (matthew.kent@alston.com) 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 

Tel: (404) 881-7000 

Fax: (404) 881-7777 

James M. Wagstaffe, Esq. (SBN 95535) 

wagstaffe@kerrwagstaffe.com 

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 

100 Spear Street, 18th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105-1576 

Tel: (415) 371-8500 

Fax: (415) 371-0500 

Attorneys For Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT)

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to Individual Case No. 

3:13-cv-02171-SC 

Master File No. 3:07-cv-05944-SC (N.D. Cal.) 

MDL No. 1917 

DELL INC. and DELL PRODUCTS L.P., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

HITACHI, LTD., et al., 

Defendants.

Individual Case No. 3:13-cv-02171-SC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING

 Plaintiffs Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. (collectively “Dell”) and Defendants 

Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Philips Electronics North America Corporation (collectively 

“Philips”) have conferred by and through their counsel and, subject to the Court’s approval, 

HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

WHEREAS, on July, 30 2014, Dell served its Second Set of Interrogatories and Second 

Set of Requests for Production on Philips. 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2889 Filed 10/02/14 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 07-5944 

REGARDING SCHEDULING MDL NO. 1917 

WHEREAS, Philips responded and objected to Dell’s Second Set of Interrogatories and 

Second Set of Requests for Production on September 2, 2014. 

WHEREAS, Philips objected to Dell’s Second Set of Interrogatories on the basis that Dell 

had exceeded its allotted 25 interrogatories as provided for under Federal Rule 33. 

WHEREAS, other plaintiffs in the above-stated action have received discovery responses 

with similar objections and intend to file motions to compel with the Special Master challenging 

the defendants’ calculation of the number of interrogatories received from the plaintiffs groups. 

WHEREAS, September 5, 2014 was the deadline to complete fact discovery in the Dell 

action. 

WHEREAS, September 12, 2014 is the deadline for all parties to object to or move to 

compel additional responses for all written discovery responses in the Dell action. 

WHEREAS, Dell and Philips have agreed to await the Special Master’s ruling on the 

proper method of calculating the number of interrogatories under Federal Rule 33 before 

evaluating whether Philips is required to provide more substantive responses to Dell’s Second Set 

of Interrogatories. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between counsel 

as follows: the deadline for Dell to move to compel additional responses for written discovery in 

the Dell action with respect to Dell’s Second Set of Interrogatories shall be moved to fourteen 

days after any order by the Special Master addressing the proper method of calculating the 

number of interrogatories under Federal Rule 33. All other dates in the Scheduling Order are 

unaffected by this stipulation. 

* * * 

The undersigned parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this 

stipulation as an order. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:___________________ ______________________________________ 

Hon. Samuel Conti

October 2, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2889 Filed 10/02/14 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 07-5944 

REGARDING SCHEDULING MDL NO. 1917 

United States District Judge 

DATED: September 12, 2014 ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

 By: /s/ Debra D. Bernstein 

Michael P. Kenny, Esq. (GA Bar No. 415064) 

mike.kenny@alston.com 

Debra D. Bernstein, Esq. (GA Bar No. 054998) 

debra.bernstein@alston.com 

Matthew D. Kent, Esq. (GA Bar No. 526272) 

matthew.kent@alston.com 

Melissa M. Whitehead, Esq. (GA Bar No. 667932) 

melissa.whitehead@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 

Tel: (404) 881-7000 

Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 

Counsel for Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. 

BAKER BOTTS LLP 

By: /s/ Charles Malaise 

Charles Malaise 

charles.malaise@bakerbotts.com 

BAKER BOTTS LLP 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004-2400 

Tel.: (202) 639-1117 

Facsimile: (202) 585-1037 

Counsel for Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Philips 

Electronics North America Corporation 

* * * 

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 2889 Filed 10/02/14 Page 3 of 3