Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05459/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-05459-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Protective Order 

CASE NO. 04-5459

1 c:\documents and settings\hlau\local 

settings\temp\notese1ef34\proposed stipulated protective 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Attorney 

BLAKE P. LOEBS, State Bar #145790 

SCOTT D. WIENER, State Bar #189266 

Deputy City Attorneys 

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3868 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

Attorneys for Defendants 

LAW OFFICES OF VICKI SARMIENTO 

VICKI I. SARMIENTO, SBN 134047 

333 No. Garfield Avenue 

Alhambra, California 91801 

Telephone: (626) 308-1171 

Facsimile: (626) 308-1101 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Kanani Boyd and Isabel Gonzalez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARYLON BOYD, individually and as 

Executor of the Estate of CAMMERIN 

BOYD, deceased, ISABEL GONZALEZ, 

a minor by and through her Guardian Ad 

Litem, Isela Gonzalez, and KANANI 

BOYD, a minor by and through her 

Guardian Ad Litem, Kamilah Boyd, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, HEATHER J. FONG, 

WILLIAM ELIEFF, GREGORY KANE, 

JAMES O'MALLEY, TIMOTHY PAINE, 

STEVEN STEARNS, and DOES 1 TO 10, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 04-5459 MMC 

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED 

CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTIVE 

ORDER

order(final).doc 

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 100 Filed 06/08/2006 Page 1 of 5
 Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 104 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 5
Protective Order 

CASE NO. 04-5459

2 c:\documents and settings\hlau\local 

settings\temp\notese1ef34\proposed stipulated protective 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

On May 18, 2006, the Court ordered production of certain records (hereinafter referred to as 

“CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS”) relating to Cammerin Boyd. The Court ordered the parties to 

meet and confer regarding a confidentiality protective order for such materials. The parties hereby 

agree to entry of the following order: 

1. The CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS, and the information, and/or contents contained 

therein, shall not be provided, displayed, exhibited, played, or otherwise disclosed, by counsel or the 

parties to other persons except as specifically provided herein. The CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS 

shall be labeled “Attorneys’ and Experts’ Eyes Only.” 

2. The CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS may be provided only to the following 

categories of persons and no other unless authorized by order of the Court: 

 a. Attorneys for the Parties to this lawsuit, 

 b. Experts, or expert consultants retained by counsel to assist in the evaluation, 

preparation, or trial of this case; however, before any expert, investigator, or consultant is permitted 

to review the CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS, such individual must agree to comply with the terms 

of this Protective Order by executing the document attached as Exhibit A. Experts, investigators, and 

consultants shall not have any power to authorize further disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL 

MATERIALS to any other person. 

3. The information disclosed in the CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS is confidential and 

privileged, and all counsel shall be responsible for insuring compliance with the terms of this 

Stipulated Protective Order. 

4. Nothing contained in this order shall prohibit any person from using or referring to 

CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS covered by this Protective Order in motion papers or pleadings filed 

with the Court, provided that adequate provision is made to protect the confidentiality of the 

CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS and provided that any portion of such motion papers or legal 

pleadings that reference said CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS, if filed, are filed under seal pursuant 

to the Court’s rules and procedures. 

order(final).doc 

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 100 Filed 06/08/2006 Page 2 of 5
 Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 104 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 5
Protective Order 

CASE NO. 04-5459

3 c:\documents and settings\hlau\local 

settings\temp\notese1ef34\proposed stipulated protective 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5. In the event any person described in 2(a-b) above, desires to exhibit documents or 

disclose CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS covered under this stipulation to witnesses during trial or 

pretrial proceedings, such person shall meet and confer with counsel to reach an agreement, in 

accordance with the Court’s rules and procedures, on an appropriate method for disclosure. Unless 

otherwise agreed, transcripts and exhibits that incorporate documents and CONFIDENTIAL 

MATERIALS covered under this stipulation shall be sealed in accordance with the Court’s rules and 

procedures, and shall be subject to the provisions of this Protective Order. 

6. At the conclusion of this litigation, by whatever means resolved, all persons shall 

return all copies of the CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS covered by this Stipulation and Order. 

Alternatively, such materials may be destroyed. 

7. This Stipulation and Order shall have no force or effect unless and until the Court 

signs below. 

SO AGREED AND STIPULATED: 

DATED: ___________________ 

 LAW OFFICES OF VICKI SARMIENTO 

 - Signed - 

By:_________________________________ 

 VICKI SARMIENTO 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 KANANI BOYD and ISABEL GONZALEZ 

DATED: ___________________ 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, CITY ATTORNEY 

SCOTT D. WIENER, DEPUTY CITY ATTY 

- Signed - 

By:__________________________ 

SCOTT D. WIENER 

Attorneys for Defendants 

order(final).doc 

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 100 Filed 06/08/2006 Page 3 of 5
 Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 104 Filed 06/12/06 Page 3 of 5
Protective Order 

CASE NO. 04-5459

4 c:\documents and settings\hlau\local 

settings\temp\notese1ef34\proposed stipulated protective 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ____________________ 

By:_________________________ 

HON. JOSEPH SPERO 

United States Magistrate Judge 

order(final).doc 

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 100 Filed 06/08/2006 Page 4 of 5

June 9, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 104 Filed 06/12/06 Page 4 of 5
Protective Order 

CASE NO. 04-5459

5 c:\documents and settings\hlau\local 

settings\temp\notese1ef34\proposed stipulated protective 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT A 

Marylon Boyd v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.

Case No. C04-5459 MCC, U.S.D.C., Northern District of California

AGREEMENT TO COMPLY WITH STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR 

CONFIDENTIAL PERSONNEL INFORMATION 

I, _________________________________, have read and understand the Court’s Protective 

Order for CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS. I agree to abide by all terms of the Order. In addition, I 

specifically understand and agree to the following: 

 1. I will not disclose the CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS, or the information and/or 

contents contained therein to any other person. 

 2. I understand that I have no power to authorize any other person to review the 

CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS. 

 3. I agree not to make copies of the CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS. 

 4. I agree to return the CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS to the counsel for the party that 

produced it, at or before the conclusion of this litigation. 

SO AGREED: 

 ________________ _________________________________________ 

 DATE SIGNATURE 

 _________________________________________ 

 PRINT NAME 

order(final).doc 

Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 100 Filed 06/08/2006 Page 5 of 5
 Case 3:04-cv-05459-MMC Document 104 Filed 06/12/06 Page 5 of 5