Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-01699/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-01699-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 29:185 Employee Pension Plan

---

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ZOOM ELECTRIC, INC., a 

California corporation, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF 

ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 

595, a labor organization, 

and DOES 1-20, 

Respondents. 

Case No. 4:11-cv-01699-CW

 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION 

TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

AND HEARING ON MOTIONS 

(Docket No. 38) 

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF 

ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 

595, a labor organization, 

Counter-Plaintiff. 

v. 

ZOOM ELECTRIC, INC., a 

California corporation; VEIKO 

HORAK, individually and as 

the alter-ego of ZOOM 

ELECTRIC, a sole 

proprietorship; and DOES ONE 

through TEN, inclusive, 

Counter-Defendants.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-3 and good cause being shown, 

Respondent and Counter-Plaintiff International Brotherhood of 

Electrical Workers Local 595’s (IBEW) Motion to continue the 

briefing schedule for dispositive motions is hereby GRANTED in 

part. 

In their filings regarding this motion, the parties agreed 

that they communicated on October 4, 2011 about the scheduling of 

a deposition; however, while IBEW described this as the deposition 

Case 4:11-cv-01699-CW Document 53 Filed 10/19/11 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

of Petitioner and Counter-Defendant Zoom Electric, Inc. (ZEI), ZEI 

and Counter-Defendant Veiko Horak described this as the deposition 

of Mr. Horak individually. 

Assuming that IBEW’s deposition of ZEI and Mr. Horak took 

place on October 17, 2011, the date on which IBEW represented it 

was tentatively scheduled to take place, the new briefing and 

hearing calendar shall be as follows: 

Union’s Opposition to Motions to Vacate 

and Dismiss; Cross-Motion to Confirm 

and Enforce 

October 27, 2011 

ZEI and Horak’s Reply to Opposition to 

Motions to Vacate and Dismiss; 

Opposition to Cross-Motion to Confirm 

and Enforce 

November 10, 2011 

Union’s Reply to Opposition to CrossMotion to Confirm and Enforce November 17, 2011 

Hearing on Motions December 8, 2012 

If IBEW’s deposition of ZEI and/or Mr. Horak did not take 

place on October 17, 2011, IBEW, ZEI and Mr. Horak shall promptly 

file a joint notice to this Court providing the date on which the 

deposition will take place and proposed dates for the briefing and 

hearing calendar. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________ ______________________________ 

Hon. Claudia Wilken 

United Stated District Judge 

Case 4:11-cv-01699-CW Document 53 Filed 10/19/11 Page 2 of 2