Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00253/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00253-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN TALAMANTEZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON, )

et al. )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:07-cv-00253-LJO-DLB-HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 8)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK SEND

PETITIONER STANDARD FORMS FOR

CLAIMS PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On May 8, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DISMISSED as it does not allege grounds that would entitle

Petitioner to habeas corpus relief, and that the Clerk of Court

send Petitioner the standard forms for claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. These Findings and Recommendation were served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed

within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. To

date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings

and Recommendation.

Case 1:07-cv-00253-LJO -DLB Document 9 Filed 06/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation are supported by

the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed May 8, 2007, are

ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as it

does not allege grounds that would entitle Petitioner to habeas

corpus relief; and,

3. The Clerk of Court send Petitioner the standard forms for

claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00253-LJO -DLB Document 9 Filed 06/20/07 Page 2 of 2