Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_11-cv-01610/USCOURTS-casd-3_11-cv-01610-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 11cv1610

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MEL M. MARIN, personally and as heir of

the Estate of Milivoj and Eva Marinkovic;

Plaintiff,

v.

ESCONDIDO CARE CENTER, et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No.11cv1610 AJB (JMA)

ORDER DENYING IN FORMA

PAUPERIS STATUS

On July 21, 2011, Mel M. Marin, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Motion to Proceed in

forma pauperis [Doc. No. 2] of case number 3:11-cv-01610-AJB-JMA to this Court. Plaintiff submitted

a declaration in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §

1915(a)(1) and Local Rule 3.2(a).

The Court finds that the Plaintiff’s declaration of inability to pay costs or give security is

insufficient to permit Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis. Permission to file a petition for writ of

mandamus in forma pauperis will not be granted unless there is some merit in the petition. 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 1915. “To proceed in forma pauperis is a privilege not a right.” Smart v. Heinze, 347 F.2d 114, 116

(9th Cir.1965). One need not be absolutely destitute to obtain benefits of statute dealing with proceedings in forma pauperis in federal courts. Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331 (1948). 

The motion, however, must state facts as to affiant's poverty with some particularity, definiteness and

certainty. Jefferson v. U.S., 277 F. 2d 723 (9th Cir. 1960). 

Case 3:11-cv-01610-AJB-JMA Document 3 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO240.pdf

K:\COMMON\BATTAGLI\DJ CASES\2 Orders to be filed\11cv1610 Marin - IFP Denial Order.wpd 2 11cv1610

The Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis lacks merit because:

• Plaintiff has noted receiving “Social Security, disability or other welfare” but has failed

to describe the source, the amount received, and what the Plaintiff expects to continue

receiving each month.

• Plaintiff has noted receiving “Gifts or inheritances” but has failed to describe the source,

the amount received, and what the Plaintiff expects to continue receiving each month.

• Plaintiff’s debts are only described as “plenty of debts.”

• Plaintiff has failed to note any housing, transportation, utilities, or loan payments, or other

regular monthly expenses.

It is under the Court's discretion to grant or deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis based

on the Plaintiff’s claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Without further evidence, the Court lacks specific facts

to find that the Plaintiff is not able to pay the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). It is advised that the

Plaintiff submit a current revision of the short form “Application To Proceed In District Court Without

Prepaying Fees or Costs” available on the United States Courts website.1

In light of this information, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in

forma pauperis is DENIED and the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Pursuant to this

Order, however, Plaintiff is granted 30 days leave to pay the $350 filing fee required to maintain this

action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914, or to submit additional documentation regarding the Plaintiff’s

economic status. IF PLAINTIFF CHOOSES TO FILE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING HIS POVERTY, HE MUST ATTACH A COPY OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 29, 2011

Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia

U.S. District Judge

Case 3:11-cv-01610-AJB-JMA Document 3 Filed 09/29/11 Page 2 of 2