Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01045/USCOURTS-caed-2_16-cv-01045-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING

CHAD S. PURDIE (SBN 282542)

DIAZ, REUS & TARG, LLP

1299 Ocean Avenue, Suite 450

Santa Monica, California 90401

Tel: (305) 375-9220

Fax: (305) 375-8050

cpurdie@diazreus.com

Attorney for specially appearing Defendants

BRIAN M. TAYLOR (SBN 214838)

AMY L. O’NEILL (SBN 294458)

BOUTIN JONES, INC.

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500

Sacramento, California 95814

Tel: (916) 321-4444

Fax: (916) 231-4105

btaylor@boutinjones.com

aoneill@boutinjones.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

GLOBAL COMMODITIES TRADING 

GROUP, INC.; THE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF THE STATE OF 

PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA;

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BENEFICIO DE ARROZ CHOLOMA, 

S.A., SADY FARID ANDONIE REYES, 

JOYCE MARY JARUFE DOX; DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:16-CV-01045-TLN-CKD

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO 

CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 

STAYING MERITS DISCOVERY PENDING 

RESOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY 

JURISDICTIONAL QUESTIONS

WHEREAS, Defendants, Beneficio de Arroz Choloma, S.A., Sady Farid Andonie Reyes, 

and Joyce Mary Jarufe Dox, have filed a motion for protective order staying merits discovery 

pending resolution of preliminary jurisdictional questions (D.E. 33), which is set for hearing on 

September 21, 2016;

Case 2:16-cv-01045-TLN-CKD Document 45 Filed 09/14/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING

-2-

WHEREAS, pursuant to Magistrate Judge Delaney’s order requiring a Joint Statement as to 

the parties’ positions on the motion (D.E. 34), counsel for the parties have engaged in extensive 

efforts to confer as to the relief requested;

WHEREAS, the parties’ counsel have determined that it would be more efficient for the

Court, the parties, and the goals of judicial economy to resolve other discovery disputes/issues that 

have arisen during the conferral efforts in conjunction with the motion for protective order; 

WHEREAS, those other issues will likely require Plaintiffs to file a motion to compel 

regarding Defendants’ discovery objections;

THE PARTIES HEREBY MOVE AND STIPULATE THAT:

The hearing currently set before Magistrate Judge Delaney at 10:00 a.m. on September 21, 

2016 on Defendants’ motion for protective order staying merits discovery pending resolution of 

preliminary jurisdictional questions (D.E. 33) be continued until all issues related to the current 

discovery dispute can be heard at the same time, with the hearing to be reset at a mutually 

convenient date and time for the parties as well as the Court.

DATED: September 13, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Chad S. Purdie

 Chad S. Purdie

DIAZ, REUS & TARG, LLP

 Attorney for specially appearing Defendants

By: /s/ Brian M. Taylor

 Brian M. Taylor

 BOUTIN JONES, INC.

 Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 2:16-cv-01045-TLN-CKD Document 45 Filed 09/14/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING

-3-

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing date of September 21, 2016 on 

defendants’ motion for protective order (ECF No. 33) is vacated. The motion may be renoticed 

after all issues related to the current discovery dispute can be heard at the same time, with the 

hearing to be reset at a mutually convenient date and time for the parties as well as the Court.

Dated: September 14, 2016

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:16-cv-01045-TLN-CKD Document 45 Filed 09/14/16 Page 3 of 3