Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01464/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-01464-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Contitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

SEALING REQUEST

C N . CIV-S-02-1464 LKK DAD

LORI A. SCHECHTER (BAR NO. 139728) 

REBEKAH KAUFMAN (BAR NO. 213222) 

NATALIE NAUGLE (BAR NO. 240999) 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: (415) 268-7000 

Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 

BARRY FRIEDMAN (admitted pro hac vice) 

New York University School of Law 

40 Washington Square South, Room 317 

New York, New York 10012-1099 

Telephone: (212) 998-6293 

Facsimile: (212) 995-4030 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF OPTOMETRISTS & 

OPTICIANS, LENSCRAFTERS, INC., EYE CARE CENTERS 

OF AMERICA, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF 

OPTOMETRISTS & OPTICIANS, 

LENSCRAFTERS, INC., EYE CARE CENTERS 

OF AMERICA, INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

EDMUND G. BROWN JR., in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the State of 

California, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CIV-S-02-1464 LKK DAD 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 

REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF 

PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF 

POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AND IN REPLY ON 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PIKE 

Date: April 19, 2010 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Place: Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton 

Courtroom 4 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01464-LKK -DAD Document 541 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

SEALING REQUEST

C N . CIV-S-02-1464 LKK DAD

1 

Plaintiffs’ request to file under seal the following documents in support of Plaintiffs' 

Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary 

Judgment and In Reply on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Pike is GRANTED: 

• Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Defendants’ 

Motion for Summary Judgment and In Reply on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary 

Judgment on Pike; 

• Supplemental Declaration of Roger G. Noll, PhD Regarding Summary Judgment 

Motions on Pike; 

• Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Separate Statement of 

Undisputed Facts in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Pike; 

• Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in 

Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Pike. 

In accordance with this Court’s January 22, 2010 Order granting Plaintiffs’ prior sealing 

request (Docket No. 494), and its subsequent Order of February 25, 2010 granting Defendants’ 

sealing request (Docket No. 520), these documents are to remain under seal pending this Court’s 

determination of whether they should remain permanently sealed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 15, 2010 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:02-cv-01464-LKK -DAD Document 541 Filed 03/16/10 Page 2 of 2