Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01467/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01467-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Stipulation and Proposed Order 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Patience Milrod 

Law Office of Patience Milrod 

844 N. Van Ness Avenue 

Fresno, California 93728 

559/442-3111 

559/442-3164 fax 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRESNO DIVISION

TERRY HILLBLOM, SANDRA HILLBLOM ) No. 1:07cv01467 LJO SMS 

and C. MICHAEL L., a minor, by and ) 

and through his guardians ad litem, TERRY ) 

and SANDRA HILLBLOM, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiffs, )

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) 

COUNTY OF FRESNO; FRESNO COUNTY ) 

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; FRESNO ) 

COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF ROBERT ) 

CAREY; FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S ) 

SERGEANTS KATHY CARREIRO and ) 

E. BROUGHTON; and DOES 1 through 50. ) 

 ) 

Defendants. ) 

) 

COME NOW plaintiffs, Terry Hillblom, Sandra Hillblom and C. Michael L., 

and defendants County of Fresno and Richard Pierce, and agree and stipulate to 

an order continuing the hearing date now set for these stipulating defendants’ 

STIPULATION TO 

CONTINUE HEARING 

DATE FOR CERTAIN 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

TO DISMISS 

and 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Date: November 15, 2007

Time: 8:30 a.m. 

Courtroom: 4 

Case 1:07-cv-01467-LJO -SMS Document 7 Filed 11/05/07 Page 1 of 3
Stipulation and Proposed Order 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

motion to dismiss. 

The parties respectfully submit that there is good cause to continue the hearing 

because the additional defendants, although all served in the action, have not yet 

appeared. The parties wish to conserve the Court’s resources, and their own, by 

litigating all at one time any Rule 12 or other pre-answer matters that any 

defendant may raise. Therefore, in order to permit the other defendants to 

evaluate such issues and to make any such motions so that they can be 

consolidated with the dismissal motion already on file, these parties, by and 

through their respective counsel, are requesting the Court to continue the hearing 

date for the 12(b)(6) motion now before it from November 15, 2007 to January 10, 

2008. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: October 30, 2007 /s/ James D. Weakley 

 JAMES D. WEAKLEY 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 COUNTY OF FRESNO and 

 RICHARD PIERCE 

DATED: October 30, 2007 /s/ Patience Milrod 

 PATIENCE MILROD 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Having reviewed the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing 

therefor, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a 

Case 1:07-cv-01467-LJO -SMS Document 7 Filed 11/05/07 Page 2 of 3
Stipulation and Proposed Order 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Claim upon which Relief can be Granted, and Motion for More Definite Statement 

filed by defendants County of Fresno and former Fresno County Sheriff Richard 

Pierce be, and hereby is, continued from November 15, 2007 at 8:30 a.m. to January 

10, 2008 at 8:30 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 11/5/07 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

 HON. LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL 

 Judge of the Eastern District 

Case 1:07-cv-01467-LJO -SMS Document 7 Filed 11/05/07 Page 3 of 3