Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02629/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02629-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THERESE M. SWENSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMTRAK, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

Case No.: 2:14-CV-2629-KJM-CMK

(PS)

 

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO

EXTEND DEFENDANT NATIONAL

RAILROAD PASSENGER

CORPORATION’S TIME TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

Date of Filing Action: May 6, 2014

Trial Date: None

_______________________________________)

THE COURT, having reviewed and approved the Stipulation to Extend

Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation’s Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint,

orders as follows: 

///

///

///

/// 

G:\Redding\DOCS\2. Orders to be Processed\14cv2629 -- Stipulated order exten1ding time.wpd

Case 2:14-cv-02629-KJM-CMK Document 5 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS ORDERED THAT the Stipulation to Extend Defendant National Railroad

Passenger Corporation’s Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is approved as follows: 

1) Defendant has an extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s complaint, up to and

including, 30 days from the date of this order;

2) Plaintiff will file an amended complaint within 30 days of this order; and 

3) Defendant will respond to amended complaint within 30 days of service of the

amended complaint. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 13, 2015

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

G:\Redding\DOCS\2. Orders to be Processed\14cv2629 -- Stipulated order exten2ding time.wpd

Case 2:14-cv-02629-KJM-CMK Document 5 Filed 01/14/15 Page 2 of 2