Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00479/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00479-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALVIN C. JOHNSON, No. CIV-S-03-0479 MCE/GGH P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

TOM L. CAREY, Warden, ET AL., 

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has

filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

General Order No. 262.

On January 14, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

On May 16, 2005, petitioner’s counsel filed objections. 

Case 2:03-cv-00479-MCE -GGH Document 33 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Petitioner himself has filed objections. However, 1

because petitioner is represented by counsel, these objections

are disregarded.

2

However, these objections do not address any of the claims that

the magistrate judge recommended be denied. 

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 14, 2005,

are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is

denied in part. All claims are denied save for petitioner’s

ineffective assistance of counsel claim related to trial

counsel’s failure to raise a competency issue.

DATED: July 26, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-00479-MCE -GGH Document 33 Filed 07/26/05 Page 2 of 2