Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04349/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04349-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

Stipulated Request to Continue Hearing and Order Case No. 16-CV-04349-EMC

21475735.v1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HARMEET K. DHILLON (SBN: 207873)

harmeet@dhillonlaw.com

NITOJ P. SINGH (SBN: 265005)

nsingh@dhillonlaw.com

DHILLON LAW GROUP INC.

177 Post Street, Suite 700

San Francisco, California 94108

Telephone: (415) 433-1700

Facsimile: (415) 520-6593

Attorneys for Defendant Gavin Jensen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ICE CONSULTING, INC. et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GAVIN JENSEN,

Defendant.

Case Number: 16-CV-04349-EMC

STIPULATED REQUEST BY ALL 

PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE 

HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ; AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case 3:16-cv-04349-EMC Document 27 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 3
2

Stipulated Request to Continue Hearing and Order Case No. 16-CV-04349-EMC

21475735.v1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiffs ICE Consulting, Inc. (“ICE”), Uzair Sattar (“Sattar”), and Derick Needham 

(“Needham”), and Defendant Gavin Jensen (“Jensen”), by and through their respective counsel, 

hereby enter into this Stipulation to continue the hearing on Plaintiff ICE’s Motion for a Preliminary 

Injunction and Order to Show Cause, currently set for hearing on August 18, 2016. The parties seek 

such a continuation so that Defendant Jensen’s counsel, who was only retained on August 16, 2016, 

may adequately prepare for any hearing on this matter, and submit an opposition.

WHEREAS, on August 3, 2016, Plaintiff ICE filed a Notice of Application and Application 

for a Temporary Restraining Order and Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 

Order to Show Cause, with supporting documents (Dkt. No. 6);

WHEREAS, on August 5, 2016, the Court issued an Order Granting Plaintiff’s Ex Parte

Application for a Temporary Restraining Order (“Order”) (Dkt. No. 19), which set a hearing on the 

Court’s order to show cause on why a preliminary injunction should not issue for August 18, 2016;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s August 5, 2016 Order, Defendant Jensen was required to 

submit any opposition to the Motion by August 12, 2016, and Plaintiff ICE was to submit any reply 

papers by August 15, 2016;

WHEREAS, Defendant Jensen only retained counsel on August 16, 2016, and was unable to 

submit an opposition by the time specified by the Court; and

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agree that the August 18, 2016 hearing 

should be continued so that Defendant Jensen’s counsel may have time to prepare for any hearing on 

this matter, and submit an opposition;

ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE to the following:

That Plaintiff ICE’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction be continued to September 15, 2016, 

at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in Courtroom 5 on the 17th floor of the 

above-entitled court located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102;

That Defendant Jensen shall file and serve any papers in opposition by September 6, 2016; 

and

That Plaintiff ICE shall file and serve any reply papers by September 9, 2016;

That pursuant to the Court’s Order, the parties stipulate and Defendant Jensen consents to an 

Case 3:16-cv-04349-EMC Document 27 Filed 08/17/16 Page 2 of 3
3

Stipulated Request to Continue Hearing and Order Case No. 16-CV-04349-EMC

21475735.v1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

extension of the Temporary Restraining Order to remain in effect through 5:00 p.m. of the day after 

the hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Order to Show Cause.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Date: August 16, 2016 DHILLON LAW GROUP INC.

By: /s/ Nitoj P. Singh

Nitoj P. Singh

Attorneys for Defendant Gavin Jensen

Date: August 16, 2016 NOSSAMAN LLP

By: /s/ Veronica M. Gray

Veronica M. Gray

Andrew C. Crane

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Ice Consulting, Inc.;

Uzair Sattar; and Derick Needham

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

Hon. Edward M. Chen

United States District Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:16-cv-04349-EMC Document 27 Filed 08/17/16 Page 3 of 3