Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-05467/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-05467-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTOR NE YS AT L AW

SIL I CO N V AL LEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DM_US 27357839-1.085199.0893

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 10-CV-05467 RS

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

WILLIAM G. GAEDE III (136184)

wgaede@mwe.com

275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100

Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004

Telephone: +1 650 815 7400

Facsimile: +1 650 815 7401

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

JOSEPH R. ROBINSON (Pro Hac Vice pending)

jrobinson@mwe.com

HEATHER M. ETTINGER (Pro Hac Vice pending)

hettinger@mwe.com

340 Madison Avenue

New York, NY 10173

Telephone: (212) 547-5509

Facsimile: (212) 547-5444

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

THE BANCHERO LAW FIRM LLP

E. JEFFREY BANCHERO (93077)

jbanchero@bancherolaw.com

SCOTT R. RABER (194924)

sraber@bancherolaw.com

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 398-7000

Facsimile: (415) 616-7000

Attorneys for Defendants Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc.–Florida, Watson

Pharma, Inc., and ANDA, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SHIRE LLC, SUPERNUS

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMY F.T. ARNSTEN, PH.D., PASKO RAKIC, M.D., and ROBERT D. HUNT, M.D.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.,

WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,

WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.–

FLORIDA, WATSON PHARMA, INC.,

and ANDA, INC.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 10-CV-05467 RS

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME FOR WATSON

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON

LABORATORIES, INC.–FLORIDA, ANDA,

INC. AND WATSON PHARMA, INC. TO

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO

PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT; AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

*E-Filed 1/6/11*

Case 3:10-cv-05467-RS Document 24 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 3
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTOR NE YS AT L AW

SIL I CO N V AL LEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DM_US 27357839-1.085199.0893 1

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 10-CV-05467 RS

WHEREAS, Defendants Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc.–

Florida, ANDA, Inc. and Watson Pharma, Inc.’s (hereinafter “Watson Defendants”) response to 

Plaintiffs’ complaint is presently due January 3, 2011;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel and Watson Defendants’ counsel conferred and agreed

that the Watson Defendants may extend the time within which to file its response to Plaintiffs’

Complaint;

WHEREAS, the Watson Defendants dispute that personal jurisdiction exists over them

generally in Northern District of California proceedings but do not contest personal jurisdiction

for purposes of this action only.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, through their

respective counsel, as follows:

1. The Watson Defendants dispute that personal jurisdiction exists over them

generally in the Northern District of California proceedings but do not contest personal

jurisdiction for purposes of this action only;

2. The time for the Watson Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’

Complaint shall be extended 24 days, up to and including January 27, 2011.

SO STIPULATED this 3rd day of January 2011.

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

By: /s/ William G. Gaede, III

William G. Gaede, III

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

THE BANCHERO LAW FIRM LLP

By: /s/ Scott R. Raber

Scott R. Raber

Attorneys for Defendants Watson 

Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc.–Florida, ANDA, Inc. and Watson Pharma,

Inc.

Case 3:10-cv-05467-RS Document 24 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 3
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

ATTOR NE YS AT L AW

SIL I CO N V AL LEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DM_US 27357839-1.085199.0893 2

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 10-CV-05467 RS

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order 45.X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence has been obtained

from Scott R. Raber indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

/s/ William G. Gaede, III

William G. Gaede, III

-oOoPURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Court Judge

1/6/11

Case 3:10-cv-05467-RS Document 24 Filed 01/06/11 Page 3 of 3