Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-00036/USCOURTS-cand-5_09-cv-00036-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) 

4020640_1.DOC 

MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 64037 

 Email: mladra@wsgr.com 

JAMES C. YOON, State Bar No. 177155 

 Email: jyoon@wsgr.com 

STEFANI E. SHANBERG, State Bar No. 206717 

 Email: sshanberg@wsgr.com 

ARIANA M. CHUNG-HAN (State Bar No. 197572) 

 Email: achung@wsgr.com 

ROBIN L. BREWER, State Bar No. 253686 

 Email: rbrewer@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

FORTINET, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., and 

PATRICK R. BROGAN, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) 

ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

FILE PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS 

UNDER SEAL PERTAINING TO 

PLAINTIFF FORTINET, INC.’S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

SUPPLEMENT AND AMEND 

DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED 

CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT 

CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO 

PATENT LOCAL RULES 3-1 AND 3-6 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

)

)

)

Case 5:09-cv-00036-RMW Document 176 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER GRANTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) 

- 1 - 4020640_1.DOC 

Having considered Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc.’s administrative 

motion to file under seal portions of Fortinet’s Motion for Leave to Supplement and Amend 

Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rules 3-1 

and 3-6 (“Motion for Leave to Supplement and Amend Infringement Contentions”) pursuant to 

Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(c) and good cause appearing: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Fortinet’s administrative motion is GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the following portions of Fortinet’s Objections shall be filed under seal: 

a) 4:21-5:4 (beginning with “For example, . . .” through the end of paragraph); 

b) 6:16-7:2 (beginning of the line through the end of paragraph); 

c) 7:17-18 (following “(e.g., . . .” through the end of parenthetical); 

d) 7:25-26 (following “to such . . .” through the end of sentence); 

e) 8:1-2 (following “Nir Zuk that . . .” through the end of sentence); 

f) 8:2-4 (following “additional evidence that the . . .” through “. . . processors,”); 

g) 12:5-11 (beginning with “discussing . . .” through the end of paragraph). 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: July 19, 2010

 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

 United States District Court Judge 

Presented by: 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

 /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg 

Stefani E. Shanberg 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant 

FORTINET, INC. 

Case 5:09-cv-00036-RMW Document 176 Filed 07/19/10 Page 2 of 2