Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00370/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-00370-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEBORAH HUNTER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-0370 JAM GGH

vs.

INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.,

CARL CARELOCK,

Defendants. SUMMARY ORDER

 /

Previously pending on this court’s law and motion calendar for February 9, 2010,

was plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery, noticed on shortened time. Appearing for plaintiff

was Jenny Huang. Jeremy Mittman appeared for defendants. The parties filed a joint statement

on February 4, 2010. Having heard oral argument and reviewed the parties’ papers, the court

now issues the following summary order.

For the reasons stated at hearing, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. In conjunction with the court’s October 29, 2009 order resolving plaintiff’s

motion to compel, filed September 24, 2009, defendants are precluded from introducing at trial

for comparative analysis any FMLA related documents which have not been produced to plaintiff

by February 28, 2010. 

Case 2:08-cv-00370-JAM-GGH Document 50 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Defendants shall produce all of these files even if portions of them are found in separate 1

locations.

2

2. Plaintiff’s second motion to compel discovery, filed January 13, 2010, is

granted. Defendants shall produce all FMLA files for defendant Carelock, and three employees

specified in plaintiff’s third set of document requests, number 19, as well as plaintiff’s own file,

in their entirety, to the extent defendants can locate them, by February 28, 2010. Any FMLA 1

documents which have not been produced to plaintiff by this date will be barred from

introduction at trial or, if documents favorable to plaintiff exist and have not been timely

disclosed, other appropriate case dispositive or issue dispositive sanctions may be imposed.

DATED: 02/11/2010

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:076

Hunter0370.dsy2.wpd

Case 2:08-cv-00370-JAM-GGH Document 50 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2