Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02656/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-02656-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID M. TUTTELMAN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAN JOSE POLICE OFFICER 

ANTHONY LUISI, SAN JOSE 

POLICE OFFICER RONALD BAYS,

Defendants. /

No. C 02-02656 WHA

SPECIAL VERDICT FORM

YOUR ANSWERS MUST BE UNANIMOUS.

1. Has plaintiff proven that Officer Anthony Luisi or Officer Ronald Bays used

excessive force? Answer as to each defendant.

Yes No

Officer Anthony Luisi ____ ____

Officer Ronald Bays ____ ____

2. Has plaintiff proven that Officer Anthony Luisi or Officer Ronald Bays arrested

plaintiff in violation of the Fourth Amendment? Answer as to each defendant.

Yes No

Officer Anthony Luisi ____ ____

Officer Ronald Bays ____ ____

Case 3:02-cv-02656-WHA Document 396 Filed 11/02/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Has plaintiff proven that Officer Anthony Luisi or Officer Ronald Bays violated

California Civil Code Section 52.1? Answer as to each defendant.

Yes No

Officer Anthony Luisi ____ ____

Officer Ronald Bays ____ ____

If you answered “yes” to any of the foregoing, you must continue to the

following questions if applicable. If you answered “no” to all of the above

questions, then you are finished and you should sign and return the form in the

envelope.

4. If any of the answers to foregoing Questions No. 1, 2, or 3 is a “yes,” state the

amount of any damages proven by plaintiff. If you award damages on multiple claims, you

must also indicate a total to eliminate any overlapping damages and to prevent double

counting. 

Officer Anthony Luisi $_________________

Officer Ronald Bays $_________________

5. If you answered “yes” to Questions No. 1, 2, or 3, did either defendants Officer

Luisi or Officer Bays act with fraud, oppression, or malice? Answer only as to the defendant

or defendants you answered “yes” to in Questions No. 1, 2, or 3.

Yes No

Officer Anthony Luisi _____ _____

Officer Ronald Bays 

(If you answer “yes” as to this question, then there will be a short supplemental

proceeding immediately after your verdict. The purpose of the short supplemental proceeding

would be to allow you to fix the amount.)

Case 3:02-cv-02656-WHA Document 396 Filed 11/02/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

CONCLUSION

ONCE YOU HAVE FINISHED ANSWERING THE NECESSARY QUESTIONS UNANIMOUSLY,

PLEASE HAVE THE FOREPERSON SIGN AND DATE THIS FORM. THEN CONTACT THE DEPUTY OR

MARSHAL TO INFORM HIM OR HER THAT YOU HAVE COMPLETED YOUR DELIBERATIONS.

Dated: November ____, 2007. 

Foreperson

Case 3:02-cv-02656-WHA Document 396 Filed 11/02/06 Page 3 of 3