Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02145/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02145-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES A. JACKSON, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN FOSTER, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-2145 CKD P

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has consented 

to have all matters in this action before a Untied State Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

On April 12, 2016, the court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint as the court is required to do 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with leave to file a 

second amended complaint. Plaintiff has now filed a second amended complaint. 

Again, the court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 

against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 

1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims 

that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be 

granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). 

/////

Case 2:15-cv-02145-CKD Document 19 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that 

are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or 

that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 

1915A(b)(1),(2). 

A claim is legally frivolous when it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact. 

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1227-28 (9th 

Cir. 1984). The court may, therefore, dismiss a claim as frivolous where it is based on an 

indisputably meritless legal theory or where the factual contentions are clearly baseless. Neitzke, 

490 U.S. at 327. The critical inquiry is whether a constitutional claim, however inartfully 

pleaded, has an arguable legal and factual basis. See Jackson v. Arizona, 885 F.2d 639, 640 (9th 

Cir. 1989); Franklin, 745 F.2d at 1227.

In order to avoid dismissal for failure to state a claim a complaint must contain more than 

“naked assertions,” “labels and conclusions” or “a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause 

of action.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-557 (2007). In other words, 

“[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory 

statements do not suffice.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). Furthermore, a claim 

upon which the court can grant relief has facial plausibility. Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570. “A 

claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw 

the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. 

at 678. When considering whether a complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted, 

the court must accept the allegations as true, Erickson v. Pardus, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200 (2007), 

and construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, see Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 

U.S. 232, 236 (1974). 

With respect to plaintiff’s amended complaint, the court found as follows:

As in his original complaint, plaintiff alleges he hurt his hand while 

conducting maintenance on a washing machine at his prison. 

Plaintiff alleges his injury was caused when a computer “glitch” 

caused the machine to start unexpectedly. He claims certain 

defendants caused his injury by not having the washing machine in 

question repaired.

Case 2:15-cv-02145-CKD Document 19 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

As with his original complaint, plaintiff still fails to state a claim 

upon which relief can be granted for cruel and unusual punishment 

under the Eighth Amendment because he fails to plead facts

suggesting any defendant subjected plaintiff to a substantial risk of 

serious harm by being at least deliberately indifferent to that risk. 

See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 828 (1994). At best, plaintiff 

alleges he was subjected to negligence in violation of California tort 

law. Good cause appearing, the court will grant plaintiff one more 

opportunity to state a claim upon which plaintiff can proceed in this 

court.

1

Plaintiff’s allegations in his second amended complaint are essentially the same as those 

in the first. Plaintiff alleges that on May 6, 2015, he worked in the laundry at California State 

Prison, Sacramento operating large washing machines. At some point that day, plaintiff was 

conducting maintenance on one of the machines. One of his hands became caught within gears 

and a rotating belt when the machine started unexpectedly due to what plaintiff terms a “computer 

glitch.” Plaintiff blames his injuries on defendants alleging that they knew the machine in 

question had suffered from computer glitches in the past.

There are two glaring omissions from plaintiff’s allegations. First, while plaintiff alleges 

defendants were aware the washing machine in question suffered from computer “glitches,” he 

does not allege that defendants were aware these “glitches” would cause the machine to start 

moving unexpectedly. Also, plaintiff fails to explain why he did not shut off power to the 

washing machine before conducting maintenance thereby eliminating any possibility that the 

washing machine would engage (or that plaintiff would get electrocuted) while he was conducting 

maintenance in a compromised position. While the court expresses no opinion as to whether 

these omissions preclude an actionable claim for negligence under California law, they do 

preclude a claim for cruel and unusual punishment in violation under the Eighth Amendment 

because the allegations simply do not demonstrate plaintiff’s injury was the result of any risk of 

serious harm clear to anybody but plaintiff or those working with plaintiff at the time he was 

injured (none of whom are named as defendants here). It is also worth mentioning that plaintiff 

 

1

 If the only actionable claim plaintiff has is for negligence in violation of California law, 

plaintiff must proceed in a California court as this court would lack jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 

1330 et seq.

Case 2:15-cv-02145-CKD Document 19 Filed 05/20/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

himself was aware that the washing machine in question had experienced computer glitches as 

plaintiff alleges he informed certain defendants that was the case. This means plaintiff was aware 

of the risks associated with working on the machine in question with the power on and they were 

not great, or they were great but plaintiff’s injuries were the result of a poor decision made by 

plaintiff to leave the power on. Either way, there is no basis to deem plaintiff’s injuries the result 

of defendants’ knowingly subjecting plaintiff to a substantial risk of serious physical harm.

For these reasons, plaintiff’s second amended complaint will be dismissed. Leave to 

amend will not be granted a third time as that appears futile.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (ECF No. 16) is dismissed; and

2. This case is closed.

Dated: May 20, 2016

1

jack2145.dis(2)

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-02145-CKD Document 19 Filed 05/20/16 Page 4 of 4