Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02098/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-02098-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Maximo Molina, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio, 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-05-2098 PHX-DGC (MEA)

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Petitioner Maximo Molina’s civil rights complaint and

United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”).

Docs. ##1, 9. The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss the complaint. 

The parties had ten days to file objections to the R&R and that the failure to timely

file objections to any determination of the Magistrate Judge would be considered a waiver

of the right to review of such determination. (See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P.

72(b). The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review

the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)

(“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the

subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (“The district judge . . . shall make a de novo

determination . . . of any portion of the magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific

written objection has been made[.]”). 

Case 2:05-cv-02098-DGC Document 10 Filed 04/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. The

Court will accept the R&R and dismiss the complaint the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)

(stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings

or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (same).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey’s R&R (Doc. #9) is accepted.

2. Petitioner Maximo Molina’s civil rights complaint (Doc. #1) is dismissed.

3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.

DATED this 13th day of April, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-02098-DGC Document 10 Filed 04/14/06 Page 2 of 2