Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02347/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02347-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

Case No.: 14-cv-02347 NC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JIMMY PERKINS,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL EXPRESS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-02347 NC

ORDER TO STRIKE

Re: Dkt. No. 45

On February 19, 2015, Perkins’ attorney, Arcolina Panto, filed a declaration 

regarding discovery compliance. This affidavit was filed in response to the Court’s 

February 11 Order, requiring Perkins to produce information and submit evidence that he 

complied with the Court’s January 30 Discovery Order. Dkt. No. 44. 

The Court STRIKES paragraphs 1-15 of the Panto affidavit. Dkt. No. 45. These 

argumentative paragraphs are non-responsive to the February 11 Order. Additionally, 

Panto did not have leave to file further argument on previous discovery disputes. To the 

extent Panto is presenting a new dispute, she must follow the meet and confer rules of this 

Court. Panto may not just file an affidavit making various arguments about discovery. 

If defendants wish to challenge Perkins’ compliance with this Court’s prior order, 

defendants must file a motion to compel documents related to Perkins’ job search (Defense 

Interrogatory No. 1 and Defense RFP No. 8) and Perkins’ income (Defense Interrogatory 

No. 2 and Defense RFP No. 10) by February 26, 2015. See Dkt. No. 40 at 2. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 19, 2015 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:14-cv-02347-NC Document 46 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 1