Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00633/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00633-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 720
Nature of Suit: Labor Management Relations Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On July18, 2012, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss with 30 days leave to 

amend. (Doc. 27) On August 20, 2012, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Motion to Amend 

Complaint: Motion to Amend Original Complaint.” (Doc. 29) Review of the document makes clear 

that Plaintiff is not moving the Court for leave to amend. Indeed, doing so would make little sense 

given the Court has granted him leave to amend the complaint already. Instead, the document appears 

to be Plaintiff’s amended. 

///

///

///

WILLIAM RAY JONES, SR.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

LEHIGH SOUTHWEST CEMENT 

COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00633 - AWI - JLT

ORDER CONSTRUING MOTION TO AMEND AS 

THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

(Doc. 29)

Case 1:12-cv-00633-AWI-JLT Document 30 Filed 08/22/12 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Therefore, the Court will construe the motion to amend (Doc. 29) as Plaintiff’s First Amended 

Complaint. Defendants SHALL file their responsive pleading within 20 days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 22, 2012 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

9j7khijed

Case 1:12-cv-00633-AWI-JLT Document 30 Filed 08/22/12 Page 2 of 2