Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01309/USCOURTS-caed-2_08-cv-01309-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARLENE B. SUMMERS, No. CIV S-08-1309-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial

review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On

August 4, 2008, the parties submitted a stipulation extending the time for plaintiff to file a

dispositive motion. Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order, plaintiff’s obligation to file a

dispositive motion is triggered by service of the certified administrative record. A review of the

docket reflects that defendant has not yet filed an answer to the complaint or lodged and served

the certified administrative record. Until the certified administrative record is served, no answer

is due. Therefore, the court declines to approve the parties’ stipulated extension of time. 

/ / /

Case 2:08-cv-01309-CMK Document 12 Filed 08/07/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ stipulated extension of

time is not approved. 

DATED: August 6, 2008

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:08-cv-01309-CMK Document 12 Filed 08/07/08 Page 2 of 2