Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_15-cv-00835/USCOURTS-almd-2_15-cv-00835-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD KYLE REEVES, #255 472, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-835-WKW

) [WO]

OFFICER D. JACKSON, )

)

Defendant. )

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 1, 2015, the court granted Plaintiff fourteen days to file an amendment to 

his complaint. Doc. 6. Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to comply with the court’s order 

would result in a Recommendation that his complaint be dismissed. Id. The requisite time has 

passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the order of the court. Consequently, the court 

concludes that dismissal of this case is appropriate for Plaintiff’s failures to prosecute this action 

and comply with the orders of the court.

Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be 

DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failures to prosecute this action and comply with 

the orders of this court.

It is further ORDERED that on or before January 26, 2016, Plaintiff may file an 

objection to the Recommendation. Any objection filed must specifically identify the factual 

findings and legal conclusions in the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation to which Plaintiff

objects. Frivolous, conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District Court.

This Recommendation is not a final order and, therefore, it is not appealable.

Case 2:15-cv-00835-WKW-GMB Document 7 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 2
Failure to file a written objection to the proposed findings and recommendations in the 

Magistrate Judge’s report shall bar a party from a de novo determination by the District Court of 

factual findings and legal issues covered in the report and shall “waive the right to challenge on 

appeal the district court’s order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions” except 

upon grounds of plain error if necessary in the interests of justice. 11th Cir. R. 3-1; see 

Resolution Trust Co. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993); Henley v. 

Johnson, 885 F.2d 790, 794 (11th Cir. 1989).

DONE on this 12th day of January, 2016.

 /s/ Gray M. Borden 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00835-WKW-GMB Document 7 Filed 01/12/16 Page 2 of 2