Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04898/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04898-46/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No.: 3:06-CV-04898 JSW

[PROPOSED] ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

G&C AUTO BODY, INC., a California 

Corporation, and DIBBLE’S 

AUTOBODY, the Collision Works, a 

sole proprietorship, 

Plaintiffs 

vs. 

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, an Iowa corporation, 

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Maryland 

corporation, GEICO CASUALTY 

COMPANY, a Maryland corporation, and 

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, a 

Maryland corporation, and DOES 1 

through 100, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO.: 3:06-CV-04898 JSW 

The Honorable Jeffrey White 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE GEICO'S 

REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF 

STAY, OR ALTERNATIVELY, FOR 

LEAVE TO OBJECT TO MAGISTRATE’S 

RULING TO PRESERVE GEICO’S 

POSITION 

Date: 

Time: 

Courtroom: 

DATE OF REMOVAL: August 14, 2006 

TRIAL DATE: None 

...(caption continued next page) 

Case 3:06-cv-04898-JSW Document 463 Filed 10/21/08 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - Case No.: 3:06-CV-04898 JSW

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, an Iowa corporation, 

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Maryland 

corporation, GEICO CASUALTY 

COMPANY, a Maryland corporation, and 

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, a 

Maryland corporation, 

Counter-claimants, 

vs. 

G&C AUTO BODY, INC., a California 

Corporation, and DIBBLE’S 

AUTOBODY, the Collision Works, a 

sole proprietorship, 

Counter-defendants. 

The Court having considered GEICO’s Request For Clarification of Stay, Or 

Alternatively, For Leave To Object To Magistrate’s Ruling To Preserve GEICO’s Position and 

being fully advised in the particulars, hereby orders as follows: 

On October 8, 2008, this Court stayed this matter under November 21, 2008, or until 

substitute counsel appears for G&C. [Doc. # 452] On October 9, 2008, during the stay, the 

Magistrate Judge issued an Order that GEICO could take no more discovery in this case. [Doc. # 

454] Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), GEICO has 10 days to object to 

the Magistrate Judge's ruling, or until October 23, 2008. 

For these reasons, the Court ORDERS that GEICO’s Request For Clarification of Stay, Or 

Alternatively, For Leave To Object To Magistrate’s Ruling To Preserve GEICO’s Position is 

granted. The stay tolls the 10 day period to object until 10 days after the stay is lifted [or 

alternatively, GEICO may lodge its objections to the October 9 Order on October 23, 2008.] 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

United States District Judge 

Northern District of California 

October 21, 2008

Case 3:06-cv-04898-JSW Document 463 Filed 10/21/08 Page 2 of 2