Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-02048/USCOURTS-casd-3_18-cv-02048-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332sf Diversity: Securities Fraud

---

1 

18cv2048-WQH(BLM) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

REDHAWK HOLDINGS CORP AND 

BEECHWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC, 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

DANIEL J. SCHREIBER AND SCHREIBER 

LIVING TRUST, dated 2/08/95, 

Defendants.

Case No.: 18cv2048-WQH(BLM) 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH 

SUBPOENA AND MOTION FOR AN 

EXPEDITED HEARING ON THE NONPARTY’S MOTION AS MOOT 

[ECF Nos. 2 and 4] 

On August 31, 2018, non-party Andrea Schreiber, filed a Motion to Quash Subpoena. ECF 

Nos. 1 and 2. 

On September 5, 2018, Ms. Schreiber filed a Motion for Expedited Hearing on Non-Party’s 

Motion to Quash Subpoena. ECF No. 4. 

On September 10, 2018, Ms. Schreiber filed a Notice of Dismissal. ECF No. 6. In the 

notice, Ms. Schreiber stated that she 

hereby dismisses [her] previously filed Motion to Quash in the above-captioned 

matter, which was filed in response to a subpoena served in the case of Redhawk 

Holdings Corp. v. Daniel J. Schreiber Trustee, et al., Civil Action File No.: 17-cv00819-ILRL-DEK in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. This 

voluntary dismissal is filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(1)(A)(i) because the opposing party has not yet served an answer or a 

Case 3:18-cv-02048-WQH-BLM Document 8 Filed 09/18/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2 

18cv2048-WQH(BLM) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

motion for summary judgment. This dismissal is based on the representation of 

counsel for Plaintiffs REDHAWK HOLDINGS CORP. AND BEECHWOOD 

PROPERTIES, LLC that the subpoena at issue is withdrawn. 

Id. at 1. 

In light of Plaintiff’s notice, the Motion to Quash Subpoena and Motion for an Expedited 

Hearing on the Non-Party’s Motion are DENIED AS MOOT. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 9/18/2018 

Case 3:18-cv-02048-WQH-BLM Document 8 Filed 09/18/18 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2