Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01212/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-01212-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: POST-12/17/07 DEPOSITIONS 

CASE NOS. C-06-01665 PJH, (CONS.) ET AL. 

KENNETH R. O’ROURKE (S.B. # 120144) 

korourke@omm.com 

PAUL B. SALVATY (S.B. # 171507) 

psalvaty@omm.com 

STEVEN H. BERGMAN (S.B. # 180542) 

sbergman@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

400 South Hope Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899 

Telephone: (213) 430-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 

MICHAEL F. TUBACH (S.B. # 145955) 

mtubach@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3305 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. and 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC. 

in the Sun, Unisys, All-American, 

Edge & Jaco actions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Sun Microsystems, Inc., et al. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al. 

Unisys Corporation v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al. 

All American Semiconductor, Inc. v. 

Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., et al 

Edge Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al. 

Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix 

Semiconductor, Inc., et al. 

DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust, by 

its Trustee Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. 

Hynix Semiconductor, et al. 

Case Nos.: C-06-01665 PJH (Consolidated) 

 C-06-02915 PJH 

 C-07-01200 PJH 

 C-07-01207 PJH 

 C-07-01212 PJH 

 C-07-01381 PJH 

Assigned for all purposes to the 

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER PROVIDING FOR 

DEPOSITIONS OF WITNESSES 

AFTER CLOSE OF FACT 

DISCOVERY 

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 138 Filed 01/04/08 Page 1 of 9
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 1 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: POST-12/17/07 DEPOSITIONS 

CASE NOS. C-06-01665 PJH, (CONS.) ET AL

 STIPULATION

This Stipulation is entered into between Plaintiffs and Defendants Hynix 

Semiconductor Inc. and Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc. (collectively, “Hynix”) and 

Defendants Elpida Memory, Inc. and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. (collectively, “Elpida”) 

in the Sun, Unisys, All-American, Edge, Jaco and DRAM Claims actions,1

 and is made 

with regard to the following facts: 

WHEREAS, by prior order of the Court, the deadline for completion of fact 

discovery in the above-captioned actions is December 17, 2007; 

WHEREAS, by prior order of the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiffs and 

Defendants are limited to 45 depositions per side in these six antitrust cases; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants have noticed and been taking 

multiple depositions in this litigation, some of which will not be completed prior to 

December 17, 2007, because of the unavailability of several of the designated witnesses; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants jointly agree that the following 

depositions will be completed either on or before the specific dates set forth below; 

o Dae Soo Kim. On November 6, 2007, Plaintiffs noticed the deposition of Hynix 

employee Dae Soo Kim. Mr. Kim was released from the USP Lompoc Satellite Camp 

on December 14, 2007. The parties jointly agree that Mr. Kim’s deposition should be 

conducted after his release from the USP Lompoc Satellite Camp and Hynix agrees to 

produce Mr. Kim for a one-day deposition in the United States within the Northern 

District of California at Hynix’s expense, on or before March 13, 2008. The parties 

 

1 Counsel for Hynix in these five actions, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, does not represent Hynix in 

the DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust action. 

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 138 Filed 01/04/08 Page 2 of 9
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: POST-12/17/07 DEPOSITIONS 

CASE NOS. C-06-01665 PJH, (CONS.) ET AL

agree that the specific date of Mr. Kim’s deposition will be resolved between the 

parties and Mr. Kim’s counsel, and will depend on Mr. Kim’s completion of testimony 

as a witness in the trial of United States of America v. Gary Swanson (No. 06-0692 

PJH), which is scheduled to commence on February 4, 2008. The parties jointly agree 

to discuss any request by Plaintiffs to extend Mr. Kim’s deposition beyond seven 

hours, if necessary, depending on how much (if any) of the deposition is translated. 

o Michael Lin. Plaintiffs previously noticed the deposition of Michael Lin, a former 

Elpida employee, and personally served a subpoena on Mr. Lin for his deposition to 

occur on December 17, 2007. Plaintiffs agreed to postpone the deposition at the 

request of Elpida after counsel for Elpida informed plaintiffs that the witness would 

not appear for the deposition. Elpida’s counsel has informed Plaintiffs that Mr. Lin is 

available for a one-day deposition in San Diego, California, on February 5, 2008. 

o Timothy Hodgson. On December 12, 2007, after finally locating Timothy 

Hodgson, a former Hynix employee, Plaintiffs personally served a subpoena on him 

for his deposition to occur on December 17, 2007. Mr. Hodgson has agreed to appear 

for a one-day deposition in the vicinity of San Jose, California, where he lives and 

works, on January 10, 2008. 

o Linda Park. On October 16, 2007, Hynix noticed the deposition of Sun 

Microsystems, Inc. (“Sun”) employee Linda Park, who works and resides in South 

Korea. Sun’s counsel has represented that Ms. Park was not available for deposition 

prior to the December 17, 2007 fact discovery cutoff but was available to appear at a 

one-day deposition in the Northern District of California on December 18, 2007, and 

Sun produced her on that date. 

o Alwin Sulaiman / Sun Rule 30(b)(6) Designee re Purchase Data. Sun has 

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 138 Filed 01/04/08 Page 3 of 9
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: POST-12/17/07 DEPOSITIONS 

CASE NOS. C-06-01665 PJH, (CONS.) ET AL

identified Alwin Sulaiman, who works and lives outside the United States, in response 

to Defendants’ Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notices, dated July 6 (as revised on September 

28), with respect to Sun’s transactional data. Hynix also seeks to take Mr. Sulaiman’s 

deposition pursuant to its Rule 30(b)(1) notice served on December 7, 2007. Sun’s 

counsel has represented that Mr. Sulaiman was not available prior to December 17, 

2007, because of his need to secure a visa and make travel arrangements to the United 

States, but Sun has agreed to make Mr. Sulaiman available for a one-day deposition in 

the Northern District of California on or before January 18, 2008, or as soon as 

reasonably possible once he has obtained the necessary visa. 

o Warren Mootrey / Sun Rule 30(b)(6) Designee re Sun Sales. Sun has identified 

Warren Mootrey in response to Defendants’ Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notices, dated 

July 6 (as revised on September 28), with respect to Sun’s marketing and sales of 

products containing DRAM. Sun’s counsel has represented that Mr. Mootrey was not 

available prior to December 17, 2007. Sun has agreed to make Mr. Mootrey available 

for a one-day deposition in the vicinity of Boston, Massachusetts, where he lives and 

works, on or before January 18, 2008. 

o Chris Maxwell / Sun Rule 30(b)(6) Designee re External Manufacturers. Sun 

has identified Chris Maxwell in response to Defendants’ Rule 30(b)(6) notices, dated 

July 6 and July 27 (as revised on September 28), with respect to Sun’s relationships 

with its External Manufacturers and has agreed to make Mr. Maxwell available for a 

one-day deposition in the vicinity of Boston, Massachusetts, where he lives and works, 

on or before January 18, 2008. 

o Sun Rule 30(b)(6) Designee re “Purges.” Sun has agreed to make a corporate 

deponent available for a one-day deposition to provide further testimony in response to 

Defendants’ Rule 30(b)(6) notices, dated July 6 and July 27 with respect to Sun’s 

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 138 Filed 01/04/08 Page 4 of 9
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 4 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: POST-12/17/07 DEPOSITIONS 

CASE NOS. C-06-01665 PJH, (CONS.) ET AL

“purges” of DRAM supplied by Elpida on or before January 18, 2008. Sun presently 

expects this witness to be Alwin Sulamain and further expects that the deposition will 

occur on the same day as the deposition regarding Sun’s purchase data. 

o Unisys Rule 30(b)(6) Designee re Document Collection. Unisys has identified 

Kevin Krueger in response to Defendants’ Rule 30(b)(6) notices, dated July 6 and July 

31 (as revised on September 28), with respect to Unisys Corporation’s document 

preservation, collection and production efforts. Unisys has agreed to make Mr. 

Krueger available for a one-day deposition in the vicinity of Minneapolis, Minnesota, 

where he lives and works, on or before January 18, 2008. 

o Unisys Rule 30(b)(6) Designee re Purchase Data. Unisys has agreed to make its 

corporate deponent available for a one-day deposition in response to Defendants’ Rule 

30(b)(6) notice, dated July 6 (as revised on September 28), in the vicinity of where the 

witness lives and works on or before January 18, 2008. Unisys presently expects this 

witness to be Kevin Krueger. If so, Unisys will make Mr. Krueger available on 

consecutive days to address the document preservation, collection and production 

topics and the purchase data topics, if more than one day is necessary. 

o Carolyn Stark. Hynix seeks to take the deposition of Carolyn Stark pursuant to its 

Rule 30(b)(1) notice served on December 7, 2007. Unisys has agreed to make Ms. 

Stark available for a one-day deposition in the vicinity of Minneapolis, Minnesota, 

where she lives and works, on or before January 18, 2008. 

o All American Rule 30(b)(6) Designee on DRAM Purchases. All American has 

agreed to make its corporate deponent available for deposition in response to 

Defendants’ Rule 30(b)(6) notice, dated July 6 (as revised on September 28), in the 

vicinity of Miami, Florida, where the witness lives and works, on or before January 18, 

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 138 Filed 01/04/08 Page 5 of 9
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 5 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: POST-12/17/07 DEPOSITIONS 

CASE NOS. C-06-01665 PJH, (CONS.) ET AL

2008. 

o Ueno Hirohisa: Mr. Ueno, a current Elpida employee resident in Japan, was 

previously deposed in these actions on December 14, 2007. Elpida has agreed to make 

Mr. Ueno available for up to three additional hours of deposition with a Japanese 

interpreter in the United States, provided the parties are able to agree upon how his 

reasonable travel and lodging costs will be borne. 

o Yukio Sakamoto: Elpida has agreed to make Mr. Sakamoto available for a 

deposition of up to four hours in English, with a Japanese interpreter present to assist 

with translation when necessary. If Mr. Sakamoto otherwise travels to the U.S. for 

business before the end of February 2008, the deposition will take place in the United 

States. Otherwise, it will take place in Tokyo, Japan, where Mr. Sakamoto works. 

Plaintiffs have agreed not to examine Mr. Sakamoto on any events occurring after 

November 2002 unless Mr. Sakamoto provides testimony in response to questions 

about pre-November 2002 that provides Plaintiffs with a good faith basis to explore 

beyond that time period. 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that the stipulated agreement to conduct the 

above depositions after the December 17, 2007 fact discovery cut-off date applies only to 

these specific depositions and does not apply to any other deponents or discovery. With 

respect to those additional Rule 30(b)(6) depositions that the parties have agreed to 

complete in one day, the parties agree that if the deposing party determines that more than 

seven hours of testimony is required to complete the deposition, the parties will meet and 

confer to attempt to reach an agreement about how much additional time is needed before 

bringing the matter to the Court’s attention. 

NOW THEREFORE, PLAINTIFFS, HYNIX AND ELPIDA, THROUGH 

THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE to the Court entering the 

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 138 Filed 01/04/08 Page 6 of 9
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 6 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: POST-12/17/07 DEPOSITIONS 

CASE NOS. C-06-01665 PJH, (CONS.) ET AL

attached Proposed Order. 

 Stipulated by: 

Dated: December 28, 2007 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

KENNETH R. O’ROURKE 

MICHAEL F. TUBACH 

PAUL B. SALVATY 

STEVEN H. BERGMAN 

 /s/ Paul B. Salvaty 

 Paul B. Salvaty 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. and 

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA 

INC. in the Sun, Unisys, All American, 

Edge and Jaco actions 

Dated: December 28 , 2007 CROWELL & MORING LLP 

/s/ David D. Cross 

 David D. Cross 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., UNISYS 

CORPORATION, JACO ELECTRONICS, 

INC., EDGE ELECTRONICS, INC., and 

ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, 

INC. 

Dated: December 28, 2007 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT 

LLP 

/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV 

 Harrison J. Frahn IV 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 

ELPIDA MEMORY, INC., and ELPIDA 

MEMORY (USA) INC. 

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 138 Filed 01/04/08 Page 7 of 9
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 7 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: POST-12/17/07 DEPOSITIONS 

CASE NOS. C-06-01665 PJH, (CONS.) ET AL

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 

The Court hereby ORDERS that the following depositions may occur as set forth below 

after the December 17, 2007 fact discovery deadline and further ORDERS that the 

depositions may proceed on alternative dates and locations upon mutual agreement of the 

relevant parties, but in no event will any of the following depositions occur any later than 

March 13, 2008: 

1. Dae Soo Kim on or before March 13, 2008, in the Northern District of California; 

2. Linda Park on December 18, 2007, in the Northern District of California; 

3. Alwin Sulaiman pursuant to Rule 30(b)(1) and as Sun’s 30(b)(6) designee on topics 

related to Sun’s transactional purchase data in the Northern District of California 

on or before January 18, 2008, or as soon as reasonably possible after he has 

obtained the necessary visa; 

4. Michael Lin in San Diego, California, on February 5, 2008; 

5. Timothy Hodgson in the vicinity of San Jose, California, on January 10, 2008; 

6. Warren Mootrey as Sun’s 30(b)(6) designee on topics related to marketing and 

sales of products containing DRAM in the vicinity of Boston, Massachusetts, on or 

before January 18, 2008; 

7. Chris Maxwell as Sun’s 30(b)(6) designee on topics related to Sun’s relationships 

with its external manufacturers in the vicinity of Boston, Massachusetts, on or 

before January 18, 2008; 

8. Sun’s 30(b)(6) designee on topics related to Sun’s “purges” of DRAM supplied by 

Elpida on or before January 18, 2008; 

9. Kevin Krueger as Unisys Corporation’s 30(b)(6) designee on topics related to 

Unisys Corporation’s document preservation, collection and production efforts in 

the vicinity of Minneapolis, Minnesota, on or before January 18, 2008; 

10.Unisys Corporation’s 30(b)(6) designee on topics related to Unisys Corporation’s 

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 138 Filed 01/04/08 Page 8 of 9
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 8 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RE: POST-12/17/07 DEPOSITIONS 

CASE NOS. C-06-01665 PJH, (CONS.) ET AL

transactional purchase data in the vicinity of Minneapolis, Minnesota, on or before 

January 18, 2008; 

11.Carolyn Stark in the vicinity of Minneapolis, Minnesota, on or before January 18, 

2008; 

12.An All American 30(b)(6) designee in the vicinity of Miami, Florida, on or before 

January 18, 2008; 

13.Ueno Hirohisa for up to three hours in the United States (pending agreement on 

reasonable travel and lodging costs); and 

14.Yukio Sakamoto for up to four hours in English, with a Japanese interpreter present 

to assist with translation when necessary, in the United States if Mr. Sakamoto 

otherwise travels to the U.S. for business before the end of February 2008, or in 

Tokyo, Japan, if Mr. Sakamoto does not travel to the U.S. for business before the 

end of February 2008. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

United States District Court Judge 

Northern District of California 

LA2:850541.1 

1/4/08

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:07-cv-01212-PJH Document 138 Filed 01/04/08 Page 9 of 9