Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04707/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-04707-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS 

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-04707 PJH 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

Robert E. Camors, Jr., CA BAR NO. 121204 

BOBCAMORS@FOLEY.COM

975 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: 650.856.3700 

Facsimile: 650.856.3710 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

GENMARK AUTOMATION, INC. 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

JAMES C. YOON, CA Bar No. 177155 

JYOON@WSGR.COM

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

INNOVATIVE ROBOTICS SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GENMARK AUTOMATION, INC., a 

California corporation, 

 Plaintiff, Counterdefendant, 

 v. 

INNOVATIVE ROBOTICS SYSTEMS, INC., 

a California corporation, 

 Defendant, Counterclaimant. 

CASE NO. 3:05-cv-04707 PJH 

STIPULATION FOR ORDER 

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS 

Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

Plaintiff, Genmark Automation, Inc. (“Genmark”) and Defendant, Innovative Robotics 

Systems, Inc., (“IRSI”) (Genmark and IRSI are collectively “the Parties”) hereby stipulate and 

agree to seek an order continuing the Case Management Conference which has been set by the 

Court to occur on July 15, 2010 by the Clerk’s Notice dated March 31, 2010 (Docket Item 

No. 112). The facts supporting this Stipulation are in the Declaration of Robert E. Camors, Jr. 

filed herewith and which is Exhibit A hereto (“Camors Decl.”). 

Case 4:05-cv-04707-PJH Document 117 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 5
-2-

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS 

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-04707 PJH 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Plaintiff and Defendant request the continuation of this case management conference in 

order to have additional time to pursue settlement discussions and to prepare settlement 

documentation. See Camors Decl. at para. 3. The parties have been discussing settlement since 

October 2009 and have recently agreed to a non-binding term sheet that is intended to facilitate 

the settlement of the case. See Camors Decl. at para. 3. 

Plaintiff and Defendant are aware that the case management conference statement which 

would be expected by the Court, would have to be filed no later that July 8, 2010. The Parties 

believe that the use of the available time to draft settlement documents would best serve the 

interests of justice and therefore request at least a forty-five (45) day extension or continuation of 

the case management conference. See Camors Decl. at para. 3. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Genmark Automation, Inc., and Defendant, Innovative 

Robotics, Inc., stipulate and agree that the Case Management Conference should be continued to 

a date that is at least 45 days after July 15, 2010, which will allow the Parties 60 days to seek a 

final settlement of the case. 

 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

Dated: July 2, 2010 Foley & Lardner LLP 

By: /s/ Robert E. Camors, Jr. Robert E. Camors, Jr. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 Genmark Automation, Inc. 

Dated: July 1, 2010 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 

By: /s/ James C. Yoon James C. Yoon 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 Innovative Robotics Systems, Inc. 

Case 4:05-cv-04707-PJH Document 117 Filed 07/06/10 Page 2 of 5
-3-

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS 

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-04707 PJH 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

 

Dated: , 2010 

 Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

July 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS 

CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 AT 

2:00 P.M.

Case 4:05-cv-04707-PJH Document 117 Filed 07/06/10 Page 3 of 5
-4-

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 45 DAYS 

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-04707 PJH 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant conferred on the 1st day of July, 

2010, and that this stipulation was signed by the attorneys whose names appear above. 

Dated: July 2, 2010 /s/ Robert E. Camors, Jr. 

 Robert E. Camors, Jr. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 GENMARK AUTOMATION, INC. 

Case 4:05-cv-04707-PJH Document 117 Filed 07/06/10 Page 4 of 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

CASE NO. 3:05-CV-04707 PJH 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 2nd day of July, 2010, a copy of the foregoing was filed 

electronically through the Court’s CM/ECF system, with notice of case activity automatically 

generated and sent electronically to all parties. 

 /s/ Robert E. Camors, Jr. Robert E. Camors, Jr. 

Case 4:05-cv-04707-PJH Document 117 Filed 07/06/10 Page 5 of 5