Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02752/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-02752-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

FOURTH JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR METLIFE TO RESPOND

TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

03433980.1 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

C. ANDREW KITCHEN (SBN 292609)

dkitchen@maynardcooper.com

ALEXANDRA V. DRURY (SBN 291920)

adrury@maynardcooper.com

MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 1350

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 591-8371

Facsimile: (205) 254-1999

Attorneys for Defendant

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

GLENN KANTOR (SBN 122643)

gkantor@kantorlaw.net

BETH A. DAVIS (SBN 277560)

bdavis@kantorlaw.net

ANDREW KANTOR (SBN 303093)

akantor@kantorlaw.net

KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP

19839 Nordhoff Street

Northridge, CA 91324

Telephone: (818) 886-2525

Facsimile: (818) 350-6272

Attorneys for Plaintiff

NIA MUJADADI-TURAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NIA MUJADADI-TURAN

Plaintiff,

vs.

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC;

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05:15-cv-2752-EJD

Hon. Edward J. Davila

FOURTH JOINT STIPULATION TO

CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR

METLIFE TO RESPOND TO

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Complaint Filed: June 18, 2015

Trial Date: TBD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward J. Davila

DATED: 11/10/2015

Case 5:15-cv-02752-EJD Document 31 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 4
FOURTH JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR METLIFE TO RESPOND

TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

03433980.1 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

JOINT STIPULATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Nia Mujadadi-Turan (“Plaintiff”) and

Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), hereby jointly stipulate to an

extension of time for MetLife to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The Parties agree and

stipulate that MetLife will respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before December 9, 2015.

In support of this Stipulation, the Parties agree and stipulate as follows:

1. On June 18, 2015, Plaintiff initiated the present action against MetLife in the

United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (See ECF Doc. No. 1).

2. MetLife was served with the Summons and Complaint in this action on June

26, 2015.

3. The parties submitted stipulations extending the deadline for MetLife to

respond to the Complaint to facilitate on-going settlement discussions. (See ECF Doc. Nos.

11, 13 and 20).

4. The Parties have agreed to an additional thirty (30) day extension of time for

MetLife to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Accordingly, based on the stipulation, MetLife’s

response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due on or before December 9, 2015.

5. The Parties are optimistic that a resolution can be reached in this matter, and

the additional time will afford the Parties the opportunity to explore settlement opportunities

without incurring additional costs of litigation. This Stipulation will not alter the date of any

event or deadline already fixed by Court order. Therefore, the Parties stipulate and agree to

extend MetLife’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint until December 9, 2015.

Case 5:15-cv-02752-EJD Document 31 Filed 11/10/15 Page 2 of 4
FOURTH JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR METLIFE TO RESPOND

TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

03433980.1 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Date: November 9, 2015 MAYNARD, COOPER, & GALE, LLP

By: /s/ C. Andrew Kitchen

C. Andrew Kitchen

Attorneys for Defendant

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY

Date: November 9, 2015 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP

By: /s/ Beth A. Davis______

Beth A. Davis

Attorneys for Plaintiff

NIA MUJADADI-TURAN

Case 5:15-cv-02752-EJD Document 31 Filed 11/10/15 Page 3 of 4
FOURTH JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR METLIFE TO RESPOND

TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

03433980.1 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of San Francisco State of California. I am over the age of

eighteen years and not a party to this action. My business address is 275 Battery Street, Suite

1350, San Francisco, CA 94111. On November 9, 2015, I served a copy of the following

documents:

FOURTH JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR METLIFE TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

[x] CM/ECF ELECTRONIC SERVICE: The following are registered CM/ECF users with

the Court, and have consented to service through the Court’s automatic transmission of a

notice of electronic filing.

GLENN KANTOR (SBN 122643)

gkantor@Kantorlaw.net

BETH A. DAVIS (SBN 277560)

bdavis@kantorlaw.net

ANDREW KANTOR (SBN 303093)

akantor@kantorlaw.net

KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP

19839 Nordhoff Street

Northridge, CA 91324

Telephone: (818) 886-2525

Facsimile: (818) 350-6272

Attorneys for Plaintiff NIA MUJADADI-TURAN

Benjamin A. Emmert

bemmert@littler.com

LITTLER MENDELSON

50 West San Fernando Street, 15th Floor

San Jose, CA 95113-2431

Telephone: (408) 998-4150

Facsimile: (408) 288-5686

Attorneys for Defendant MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that

the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Executed on November 9, 2015, at San Francisco, California.

_______________________________

Mila Dunn

Case 5:15-cv-02752-EJD Document 31 Filed 11/10/15 Page 4 of 4