Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01883/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-01883-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO: CV 09-1883 JCS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FLASHPOINT LAW, INC.

SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 205584)

3 Waters Park Drive, Suite 224

San Mateo, CA 94403

Telephone: (650) 283-5539

Facsimile: (650) 638-9620

sgupta@flashpointlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Global IP Solutions, Inc.

MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)

MJacobs@mofo.com

PATRICK J. ZHANG (CA SBN 251392)

PZhang@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

Attorneys for Defendants

NETEASE.COM, INC. and NETEASE 

BEIJING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GLOBAL IP SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

v.

NETEASE.COM, INC. and NETEASE, 

BEIJING,

Defendants.

Case No. CV-09-1883 JCS 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Mag. Judge Spero

Case 3:09-cv-01883-JCS Document 53 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-01883-JCS Document52 Filed04/12/10 Page1 of 2
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO: CV 09-1883 JCS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to a settlement agreement between the parties and Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Global IP Solutions, Inc and Defendants Netease.com, 

Inc. and Netease Beijing, through their Attorneys of Record, hereby stipulate that the abovecaptioned action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own costs 

and fees.

Dated: April 12, 2010 FLASHPOINT LAW, INC.

By: /s/ Shirish Gupta 

Shirish Gupta

Attorneys for Plaintiff Global IP Solutions, Inc.

Dated: April 12, 2010 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Patrick J. Zhang____

Patrick J. Zhang

Attorneys for Defendants Netease.com, Inc. 

and Netease Beijing

E-Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B. regarding non- filing signatories, Shirish Gupta hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has 

been obtained from Patrick Zhang.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the above Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. This matter is hereby dismissed 

with prejudice in its entirety and each party shall bear its own costs and fees.

Dated: ________________ By: __________________________

Hon. Joseph C. Spero

United States Magistrate Judge

Case3:09-cv-01883-JCS Document52 Filed04/12/10 Page2 of 2

April 12, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:09-cv-01883-JCS Document 53 Filed 04/13/10 Page 2 of 2