Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00592/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00592-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

5945839 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REX S. HEINKE (SBN 66163) 

KALIA C. PETMECKY (SBN 194094) 

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400 

Los Angeles, California 90067-3012 

Telephone: 310-229-1000 

Facsimile: 310-229-1001 

Attorneys for Defendant, CITY OF SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, a California 

Corporation,, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER 

COOPERATIVE, INC., CITY OF 

ANAHEIM; CITY OF AZUSA; CITY OF 

BANNING; CITY OF BURBANK; CITY 

OF GLENDALE; CITY OF LOS 

ANGELES; CITY OF PASADENA; CITY 

OF RIVERSIDE; CITY OF SANTA 

CLARA; CITY OF SEATTLE; CITY OF 

VERNON; EUGENE WATER AND 

ELECTRIC BOARD; LOS ANGELES 

DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER; 

MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT; 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER 

AGENCY; PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT 

NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY; 

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY 

DISTRICT; SALT RIVER PROJECT 

AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND 

POWER DISTRICT; AND TURLOCK 

IRRIGATION DISTRICT, 

Defendants

Case No. 2:06-CV-0592-MCE-KJM 

[Assigned To The Honorable Morrison 

C. England, Jr.] 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING DEFENDANT CITY 

OF SEATTLE’S TIME TO 

ANSWER 

Date Action File: March 23, 2006 

Case 2:06-cv-00592-MCE -KJM Document 151 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 3
5945839 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

WHEREAS, plaintiff San Diego Gas & Electric Company (“SDGE”) filed a 

complaint in this action on March 23, 2006 (“Complaint”); 

WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Stipulation and Order (“Stipulation”), 

which among other things, sets forth a briefing and hearing schedule for preliminary 

motions; 

WHEREAS, several defendants filed Motions to Dismiss which are set for 

hearing on October 24, 2006; 

WHEREAS, defendant City of Seattle did not file a preliminary motion and 

intends to file an Answer in response to SDGE’s Complaint; 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:06-cv-00592-MCE -KJM Document 151 Filed 07/25/06 Page 2 of 3
5945839 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and 

between plaintiff SDGE and defendant City of Seattle, through their respective counsel 

of record, that the City of Seattle’s time to file and serve its Answer to SDGE’s 

Complaint shall be extended to and including September 15, 2006. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: July __, 2006 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & 

FELD LLP 

By /s/ 

Kalia C. Petmecky 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY OF SEATTLE 

Dated: July __, 2006 HENNIGAN, BENNETT &DORMAN LLP 

By_______________/s/___________________

Robert W. Mockler 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: July 25, 2006

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00592-MCE -KJM Document 151 Filed 07/25/06 Page 3 of 3