Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00792/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-00792-24/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD HOMEM, et al.,

Plaintiffs

 v.

INTEC CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants /

No. C 06-0792 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT/

THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINANT TO

LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On August 9, 2006, defendant/third-party complainant Intec USA, LLC electronically

filed a Third Party Complaint. Defendant/third-party complainant has violated General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s

Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed

electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked

‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and

‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders

For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendant/third-party complainant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of

the above-referenced document. Defendant/third-party complainant is hereby advised that

if it fails in the future to comply with the Court’s Standing Order to provide chambers copies

Case 3:05-cv-00792-MMC Document 192 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

of electronically-filed documents, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited

to, striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has

not been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 6, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-00792-MMC Document 192 Filed 09/06/06 Page 2 of 2