Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00559/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00559-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 1 – STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT EWEB TO FILE RULE 12(B)(2) MOTION

CARLA S. RHODEN, CA State Bar No. 223743 

Email address: crhoden@chbh.com

CABLE HUSTON BENEDICT HAAGENSEN & LLOYD LLP 

1001 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000 

Portland, OR 97204-1136 

Telephone: (503) 224-3092 

Facsimile: (503) 224-3176 

Attorneys for Defendant Eugene Water & Electric Board 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 

EDISON COMPANY, and CALIFORNIA 

ELECTRICITY OVERSIGHT BOARD, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER 

COOPERATIVE, INC., CITY OF 

ANAHEIM; CITY OF AZUSA; CITY OF 

BANNING; CITY OF BURBANK; CITY OF 

GLENDALE; CITY OF LOS ANGELES; 

CITY OF PASADENA; CITY OF 

RIVERSIDE; CITY OF SANTA CLARA; 

CITY OF SEATTLE; CITY OF VERNON; 

EUGENE WATER AND ELECTRIC 

BOARD; LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT 

OF WATER AND POWER; MODESTO 

IRRIGATION DISTRICT; NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY; PUBLIC 

UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT 

COUNTY; SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL; 

UTILITY DISTRICT; SALT RIVER 

PROJECT AGRICULTURAL 

IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT; 

AND TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT, 

Defendants. 

Civil No. 2:06-cv-0559-MCE-KJM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING 

THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT EUGENE 

WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD TO FILE 

RULE 12(B)(2) MOTION 

Related Case 

Case 2:06-cv-00559-MCE -KJM Document 67 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 2 – STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT EWEB TO FILE RULE 12(B)(2) MOTION

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, a California Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER 

COOPERATIVE, INC., CITY OF 

ANAHEIM, CITY OF AZUSA, CITY OF 

BANNING, CITY OF BURBANK, CITY OF 

GLENDALE, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 

LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF 

WATER AND POWER, CITY OF 

PASADENA, CITY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY 

OF SANTA CLARA, CITY OF SEATTLE, 

CITY OF VERNON, EUGENE WATER 

AND ELECTRIC BOARD, MODESTO 

IRRIGATION DISTRICT, NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY, PUBLIC 

UTILITY NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY, 

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY 

DISTRICT, SAL RIVER PROJECT 

AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND 

POWER DISTRICT, and TURLOCK 

IRRIGATION DISTRICT, 

 Defendants. 

Civil No. 2:06-cv-0592-MCE-KJM 

COMES NOW Plaintiffs and Defendant Eugene Water & Electric Board (“EWEB”), by and 

through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and request the Court enter an Order as follows: 

Extending the time for EWEB to file a motion challenging personal jurisdiction pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Procedure 12(b)(2) and any related opposition and reply briefs. On April 5, 2006 

the parties to these actions filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order continuing the time for the 

defendants to respond by one week. On April 10, 2006, this Court adopted the April 5, 2006 

Stipulation as the Court’s Order. On April 11, 2006 the parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] 

Order setting a schedule for, among other things, EWEB to file a motion challenging personal 

jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 12(b)(2) and any related opposition and reply 

briefs. 

The Court entered an Order pursuant to the stipulation dated April 12, 2006 setting a due 

date of May 5, 2006 for EWEB’s Opening Brief, June 16, 2006 for Opposition Briefs and July 7, 

2006 for Reply Brief in related case numbers 2:06:CV-00599-MCE-KJM and 2:06:CV-00592-

Case 2:06-cv-00559-MCE -KJM Document 67 Filed 05/09/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 3 – STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT EWEB TO FILE RULE 12(B)(2) MOTION

MCE-KJM. In light of ongoing settlement discussions, all of the Plaintiffs and EWEB hereby 

stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an Order extending the deadlines as follows: 

EWEB’s Opening Brief to be served May 15, 2006; Opposition Briefs to be served June 26, 2006; 

and Reply Brief to be served July 17, 2006. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

 CABLE HUSTON BENEDICT HAAGENSEN 

 & LLOYD LLP 

Dated: May 3, 2006 /s/ Carla S. Rhoden (as authorized on May 3, 2006) 

 CARLA S. RHODEN, CA State Bar No. 223742 

 Attorneys for Defendant Eugene Water & 

 Electric Board 

 HELLER EHRMAN LLP 

Dated: May 3, 2006 /s/ Russell Cohen 

 Marie L. Fiala 

 Russell Cohen 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff Pacific Gas & Electric Co. 

 STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 

Dated: May 3, 2006 /s/ Lawrence P. Riff (as authorized on May 3, 2006)

 Lawrence P. Riff 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff Southern California Edison Co. 

 /s/ Steven Russo (as authorized on May 3, 2006)

 Steven Russo 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff California Electricity Oversight Board 

 HENNIGAN, BENNET & DORMAN LLP 

Dated: May 3, 2006 

 /s/ Laura Lindren (as authorized on May 3, 2006)

 Laura Lindgren 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff San Diego Gas & Electric Board 

Case 2:06-cv-00559-MCE -KJM Document 67 Filed 05/09/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 4 – STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANT EWEB TO FILE RULE 12(B)(2) MOTION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines for EWEB to file a motion challenging 

personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 12(b)(2) and any related opposition and 

reply briefs are extended as follows: EWEB’s Opening Brief to be served May 15, 2006; 

Opposition Briefs to be served June 26, 2006; and Reply Brief to be served July 17, 2006. 

DATED : May 9, 2006 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cv-00559-MCE -KJM Document 67 Filed 05/09/06 Page 4 of 4