Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-01995/USCOURTS-caed-2_20-cv-01995-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GARY BRICKWOOD (SBN 94892)

BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE

1135 Pine St., Suite 210

Redding, CA 96001

Tel (530) 245-1877

Fax (530) 245-1879

office@brickwoodlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants

SHASTA COUNTY, SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, TOM 

BOSENKO, DAVE KENT, ROBERT VAN GERWEN, JUSTAN VORHIS and 

KIRK SCHRITTER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BETTY ABBIE, AARON JAMES 

ABBIE and AMANDA VARNER, 

Individually and as Successor-InInterest to Decedent, TEDDIE 

ABBIE,

 Plaintiffs,

vs.

SHASTA COUNTY, a public entity,

SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF 

DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF TOM 

BOSENKO, an Individual; 

CAPTAIN DAVE KENT, an 

Individual; DEPUTY VAN 

GERWEN, an Individual; DEPUTY 

VORHIS, an Individual; 

DEPUTY SCHRITTER, an 

Individual 

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 

 Defendants.

______________________________/

Case No. 2:20-cv-01995-KJM-DMC

ORDER APPROVING 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 

ORDER

Case 2:20-cv-01995-DC-DMC Document 40 Filed 10/13/21 Page 1 of 2
PROTECTIVE ORDER

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court has considered the Stipulation of the parties and their request for 

the proposed Protective Order in this matter and finds as follows:

The Protective Order submitted appears proper and meets the requirement of 

the law and therefore the Court orders as follows:

IT IS ORDERED that the Protective Order submitted pursuant to the parties’ 

stipulation, ECF No. 39, is ordered by the Court to be a Protective Order in effect 

in this case; 

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that nothing in the Protective Order 

shall limit the testimony of parties or non-parties or the use of documents and other 

exhibits at any trial or court hearing, such determinations will be made by the Court 

at the hearing or trial or upon appropriate motion by the parties;

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that the parties must comply with the 

provisions related to motions to seal documents as directed by any pretrial 

scheduling order by the Court and as set forth by court rules, and to the extent there 

is any inconsistency between the Protective Order and any order sealing documents 

issued by the Court as part of its pretrial scheduling order or Rules of Court, the 

scheduling order and Rules of Court shall govern.

Dated: October 13, 2021

____________________________________

DENNIS M. COTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:20-cv-01995-DC-DMC Document 40 Filed 10/13/21 Page 2 of 2