Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02792/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02792-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICIA SEXTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-2792 DFL EFB PS

vs.

BEAU OF FEDERAL

INVESTIGATION,

Defendant. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed January 10, 2007, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave

to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff

has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days after

being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with

the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez

Case 2:06-cv-02792-JAM-EFB Document 5 Filed 02/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 26, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-02792-JAM-EFB Document 5 Filed 02/27/07 Page 2 of 2