Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01884/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-01884-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1365 Environmental Matters

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING 

PROTECTION ALLIANCE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF REDDING, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:12-cv-01884-KJM-KJN 

ORDER 

On July 9, 2013, the judge previously assigned to this matter approved a proposed 

consent decree, which provided for final settlement of the case. ECF No. 22. Under the terms of 

the consent decree, the court retained jurisdiction over the parties to enforce its terms if necessary, 

and the decree expired June 28, 2016. ECF No. 20 at 5–6. On January 14, 2016, after the case 

was reassigned to the undersigned, the undersigned ordered the parties to show cause why the 

case should not be closed. ECF No. 26. Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance 

(CSPA) responded on January 21, 2016, and requested the court not close the case until defendant 

City of Redding satisfied its obligations under the consent decree and the consent decree expired. 

ECF No. 27. at 1. 

The consent decree has now expired. The parties are now ORDERED TO SHOW 

CAUSE within seven days why this case should not be closed. 

Case 2:12-cv-01884-KJM-KJN Document 29 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June 30, 2016 

Case 2:12-cv-01884-KJM-KJN Document 29 Filed 07/01/16 Page 2 of 2