Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01216/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01216-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814 

Telephone: (916) 554-2729

Attorneys for Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANJINDER DHILLON, ) CV 07-F-CV-1216 AWI

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) DEFENDANTS’ SECOND 

Michael Chertoff, et al. ) MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION

) OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE 

) AN ANSWER AND

Defendants. ) ORDER

__________________________________________)

Plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging that defendants have failed to timely process his

application for adjustment of status to that of lawful permanent resident. On October 18, 2007,

defendants filed an initial request for an extension of time in which to file an answer to the

complaint, indicating that adjudication was imminent. As ofthe date of filing of this second request,

the adjudication has not been completed, but according to officials within the U.S. Citizenship and

Immigration Services, remains imminent and likely to be completed within an additional 60 days.

For this reason, defendants request a second extension of time in which to either file an answer

to the complaint or a motion to dismiss the matter as moot. Defendants expect this adjudication to

be completed within an additional 60 days, and therefore request an extension until February 15,

2007. Plaintiff’s counsel consents to this motion.

 

Dated: December 17, 2007 Respectfully Submitted,

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

Case 1:07-cv-01216-AWI-GSA Document 21 Filed 12/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

By: /s/Audrey Hemesath

Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

ORDER

Pursuant to this Second Motion for an Extension of Time and for the reasons stated therein, IT

IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants’ Answer is due on February 15, 2008. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 19, 2007 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

60kij UNI 8 TED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01216-AWI-GSA Document 21 Filed 12/19/07 Page 2 of 2