Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05035/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-05035-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL. - C 06-05035 PJH

GEORGE A. RILEY (State Bar No. 118304)

LUANN L. SIMMONS (State Bar No. 203526)

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 984-8700

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701

E-Mail: griley@omm.com

lsimmons@omm.com

DAVID M. FURBUSH (State Bar No. 83447)

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

2765 Sand Hill Road

Menlo Park, California 94025

Telephone: (650) 473-2600

Facsimile: (650) 473-2601

E-Mail: dfurbush@omm.com

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant

APPLE COMPUTER, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PHYLLIS JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

STEVEN P. JOBS, TIMOTHY D. COOK, 

RONALD B. JOHNSON, PETER 

OPPENHEIMER, JONATHAN 

RUBENSTEIN [SIC], AVADIS TEVANIAN, 

JR., FRED D. ANDERSON, MITCHELL 

MANDICH, WILLIAM V. CAMPBELL, 

MILLARD S. DREXLER, ARTHUR D. 

LEVINSON, JEROME B. YORK, GARETH 

C.C. CHANG, LAWRENCE J. ELLISON, 

EDGAR S. CALDERONI, G. FREDERICK 

FORSYTH, DANIEL L. EILERS, and JAMES 

J. BUCKLEY,

Defendants,

- and -

APPLE COMPUTER, INC.,

Nominal Defendant.

Case No. C 06-05035 PJH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT

Case 5:06-cv-05035-JF Document 13 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL. - C 06-05035 PJH

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Phyllis Jones and Nominal 

Defendant Apple Computer, Inc., as follows:

WHEREAS, Jones filed her Complaint on August 22, 2006;

WHEREAS, counsel are engaged in discussing the possibility of consolidation of this 

matter with related cases and/or the subsequent filing of a consolidated complaint;

WHEREAS, the undersigned parties wish to further judicial efficiency by deferring 

responsive pleadings until such time as consolidation issues are addressed;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to L.R. 6-1, the undersigned partiesstipulate as follows:

All defendants who have been served to date, and all defendants who shall subsequently 

accept service and request to be covered by this stipulation, shall have a further extension of time 

to answer or otherwise respond to 30 days after the filing of a consolidated complaint, or in the 

event that the Court denies a motion for consolidation, the above-described defendants shall 

answer or otherwise respond to Jones’ Complaint no later than 30 days after such denial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: September 1, 2006 GEORGE A. RILEY

DAVID M. FURBUSH

LUANN L. SIMMONS

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons

Luann L. Simmons

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant

APPLE COMPUTER, INC.

Case 5:06-cv-05035-JF Document 13 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

STIP. & PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL. - C 06-05035 PJH

Dated: September 1, 2006 RONALD LOVITT

J. THOMAS HANNAN

HENRY I. BORNSTEIN

LOVITT & HANNAN, INC.

LYNN LINCOLN SARKO

JULI E. FARRIS

ELIZABETH E. LELAND

CARI C. LAUFENBERG

KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P.

By: /s/ Juli E. Farris

Juli E. Farris

GARY A. GOTTO

KELLER ROHRBACK P.L.C.

KAREN HANSON RIEBEL

LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN, PLLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PHYLLIS JONES

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from Juli Farris.

Dated: September 1, 2006 GEORGE A. RILEY

DAVID M. FURBUSH

LUANN L. SIMMONS

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons

Luann L. Simmons

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant

APPLE COMPUTER, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________________

______________________________________

The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

United States District Judge

MP1:987033.1

9/5/06

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 5:06-cv-05035-JF Document 13 Filed 09/05/06 Page 3 of 3