Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04385/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04385-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1145 E.R.I.S.A.

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD T. BERGO, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SHAMROCK CONCRETE

CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-05-4385 MMC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR

ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATES

OF DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS

Before the Court is plaintiffs’ administrative request, filed October 11, 2006, by which

plaintiff seeks consideration of the “Errata - Exhibits to Declaration of John Hagan in

Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment” (“Errata”), filed October 10, 2006, in

connection with plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs also request that the

October 27, 2006 hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment be continued to afford

defendants the opportunity to respond to the corrected declaration, and, additionally, that

the October 27, 2006 hearing on defendant Joseph Patrick Molloy’s cross-motion for

summary judgment be continued. Defendants have filed a response, stating they oppose

the request if the hearing on the two above-referenced motions are scheduled for different

dates.

//

//

Case 3:05-cv-04385-MMC Document 55 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Having reviewed the papers filed in support of and in response to the administrative

request, the Court rules as follows:

1. The Court will consider the Errata.

2. Defendants may file supplemental opposition to plaintiffs’ motion on or before

November 2, 2006.

3. Plaintiffs may file a supplemental reply on or before November 9, 2006, on which

date, unless the parties are otherwise informed, both motions will stand submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2006 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-04385-MMC Document 55 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 2