Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-00240/USCOURTS-caed-2_24-cv-00240-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NICHOLAS A. GASPAR, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AMADOR COUNTY JAIL, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:24-cv-00240-SCR P 

ORDER AND 

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 

 A court order that issued on August 6, 2024 was served on plaintiff’s address of record 

and returned by the postal service as undeliverable. ECF No. 6. It appears that plaintiff has failed 

to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona 

inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court 

order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of a current 

address. 

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court assign a district judge to this case. 

 In addition, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for 

failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 

Case 2:24-cv-00240-DC-SCR Document 7 Filed 10/29/24 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 

and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 

days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: October 29, 2024 

Case 2:24-cv-00240-DC-SCR Document 7 Filed 10/29/24 Page 2 of 2