Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05422/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05422-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

[Proposed] Order re Stipulation on Dismissal of Defendant Swatchbox Technologies, Inc. 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DICKSTEIN 

SHAPIRO LLP 

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 

Alfred R Fabricant (admitted pro hac vice) 

fabricanta@dicksteinshapiro.com 

Lawrence C. Drucker (admitted pro hac vice) 

druckerl@dicksteinshapiro.com 

Cindy Yang (admitted pro hac vice) 

yangc@dicksteinshapiro.com 

Bryan N. DeMatteo (admitted pro hac vice) 

dematteob@dicksteinshapiro.com 

1633 Broadway 

New York, NY 10019-6708 

Telephone: (212) 277-6500 

Fax: (212) 277-6501 

and 

Lawrence R. LaPorte (SBN 130003) 

laporte@dicksteinshapiro.com 

2049 Century Park East, Suite 700 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

BALTHASER ONLINE, INC. 

SCHIFFER ODOM HICKS & JOHNSON 

Logan E. Johnson (admitted pro hac vice) 

3200 Southwest Freeway, Suite 2390 

Houston, Texas 77027 

Tel: 713-357-5150 

Fax: 713-357-5160 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SWATCHBOX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

BALTHASER ONLINE, INC., 

Plaintiff, No. 5:09-cv-05422-RS 

*E-Filed 5/11/10*

Case 3:09-cv-05422-RS Document 459 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 3
 2 

[Proposed] Order re Stipulation on Dismissal of Defendant Swatchbox Technologies, Inc. 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DICKSTEIN 

SHAPIRO LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DICKSTEIN 

SHAPIRO LLP 

v. 

ART STAR DESIGN LLC, et al. 

Defendants. 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

 STIPULATION ON DISMISSAL OF 

 DEFENDANT SWATCHBOX 

 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

WHEREAS, (1) on November, 4, 2008, Plaintiff Balthaser Online, Inc. (“Balthaser”) filed a 

Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, 

commencing Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-430 (DF) against, among others, Defendant Swatchbox 

Technolgies, Inc. (“Swatchbox”); (2) on January 12, 2009, Swatchbox filed an Answer and 

Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff’s Complaint; (3) on January 15, 2009, Balthaser filed a First 

Amended Complaint; (4) on February 2, 2009, Swatchbox filed an Answer and Affirmative 

Defenses to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint; (5) on September 15, 2009, an Order concerning 

California Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue was issued transferring the action with respect to 

California Defendants, including Swatchbox, to this Court; (6) on November 17, 2009, the E.D. 

Texas Action was transferred to this District and assigned to the Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull; (7) 

on December 15, 2009, the above-styled action was reassigned to Honorable Jeremy Fogel; and (8) 

on March 18, 2010, the above-styled action was reassigned to this Court. 

WHEREAS, Balthaser and Swatchbox have reached a mutually satisfactory resolution of all 

issues between them that were the subject of Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-430 (DF) and the abovestyled action (collectively, the “Action”); 

WHEREAS, Balthaser and Swatchbox have filed a Stipulation on Dismissal of Defendant 

Swatchbox Technologies, Inc. (the “Stipulation”) with this Court advising the Court that the parties 

have reached a mutually satisfactory resolution of all issues between them that were subject of this 

Action; 

Case 3:09-cv-05422-RS Document 459 Filed 05/11/10 Page 2 of 3
 3 

[Proposed] Order re Stipulation on Dismissal of Defendant Swatchbox Technologies, Inc. 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DICKSTEIN 

SHAPIRO LLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DICKSTEIN 

SHAPIRO LLP 

NOW, THEREFORE, after considering the Stipulation, the Court is of the opinion that the 

Stipulation should be granted and therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND 

DECREED THAT: 

1. All claims and counterclaims asserted by either party in the Action against the 

other are hereby dismissed with prejudice; 

2. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees associated 

with the prosecution and defense of this Action; and 

3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of 

enforcement of the settlement. 

Dated: __________________ ____________________________ 

 Honorable Richard Seeborg 

 United States District Court Judge

May 11, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-05422-RS Document 459 Filed 05/11/10 Page 3 of 3