Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02276/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02276-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HIPOLITO M. CHACOAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2276 FCD GGH P

vs.

DR. ROHRER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On November 2, 2006, plaintiff filed an application for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s order filed October 24, 2006, denying plaintiff’s motion for appointment of

counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that

it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed October 24, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: May 11, 2007.

Case 2:05-cv-02276-MCE-KJN Document 28 Filed 05/14/07 Page 1 of 1