Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00154/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00154-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 899
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES –

SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company doing business as Shasta 

Regional Medical Center,

Plaintiff,

v.

SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her 

official capacity as Secretary of the 

Department of Health and Human Services, 

Defendant.

No. 2:14-cv-02791-TLN-KJN

NOTICE OF RELATED CASE ORDER

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES –

SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company doing business as Shasta 

Regional Medical Center,

Plaintiff,

v.

SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her 

official capacity as Secretary of the 

Department of Health and Human Services, 

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-00154-TLN-DAD

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES –

No. 2:15-cv-00324-JAM-CMK

Case 2:15-cv-00154-TLN-KJN Document 11 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company doing business as Shasta 

Regional Medical Center,

Plaintiff,

v.

SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her 

official capacity as Secretary of the 

Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendant.

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES –

SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company doing business as Shasta 

Regional Medical Center,

Plaintiff,

v.

SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her 

official capacity as Secretary of the 

Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-00400-TLN-CMK

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that they are related within the meaning 

of Local Rule 123(a) (E.D. Cal. 1997). The actions involve the same parties, are based on the 

same claims, the same questions of fact and the same questions of law, and would therefore entail 

a substantial duplication of labor if heard by different judges. Accordingly, the assignment of the 

matters to the same judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of judicial effort and is also 

likely to be convenient for the parties.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated 2:15-cv-00154-TLN-DAD,

2:15-cv-00324-JAM-CMK, and 2:15-cv-00400-TLN-CMK are hereby reassigned to District 

Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all further proceedings. Any 

dates currently set in the reassigned cases are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on 

documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as: 2:15-cv-00154-TLN-KJN, 2:15-cvCase 2:15-cv-00154-TLN-KJN Document 11 Filed 04/28/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

00324-TLN-KJN, and 2:15-cv-00400-TLN-KJN.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court make appropriate adjustment in the 

assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment and issue an Order Requiring a 

Joint Status Report for the undersigned.

Dated: April 27, 2015

Case 2:15-cv-00154-TLN-KJN Document 11 Filed 04/28/15 Page 3 of 3