Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00476/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00476-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - 1

2:04-CV-0476-RRB-KJM P

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. 2:04-CV-0476-RRB-KJM P

ORDER

Plaintiff John Hardney (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking

relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and

Local General Order No. 262.

On August 2, 2007, Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller

filed Findings & Recommendations (Docket 28) herein, which were

served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties

that any objections to the same were to be filed within twenty

days. The time period has now expired and neither party has filed

objections to the Findings & Recommendations.

JOHN HARDNEY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ANTHONY LAMARQUE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case 2:04-cv-00476-JAM -KJM Document 32 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - 2

2:04-CV-0476-RRB-KJM P

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings &

Recommendations at Docket 28 to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings & Recommendations at Docket 28, filed

on August 2, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss at Docket 25 is

DENIED.

ENTERED this 2nd day of October, 2007.

S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00476-JAM -KJM Document 32 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 2