Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00388/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00388-77/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1365 Environmental Matters

---

STIPULATION DEEMING ANSWERS TO 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT SAME AS ANSWERS TO 7

TH TH

AMENDED COMPLAINT

LEWI

S

BRISBO

IS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

JOSEPH A. SALAZAR, JR., SB# 169551

 E-Mail: jsalazar@lbbslaw.com

2850 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 450

Sacramento, California 95833

Telephone: (916) 564-5400

Facsimile: (916) 564-5444

Attorneys for FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO

ABARCA, et. al. ,

Plaintiff,

v.

MERCK & CO., et. al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00388-OWW-DLB

STIPULATION AND ORDER THEREON

DEEMING ANSWERS TO 8 AMENDED TH

COMPLAINT THE SAME AS ANSWERS

TO THE 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT TH

Plaintiffs’ have filed an Eighth Amended Complaint wherein the amended sections to the complaint

do not pertain to FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, MERCED IRRIGATION

DISTRICT, MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT #1, CITY OF MERCED or COUNTY OF

MERCED (herein collectively referred to as “public entity defendants”). It is hereby stipulated by

and between defendants, FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, MERCED IRRIGATION

DISTRICT, MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT #1, CITY OF MERCED and COUNTY OF

MERCED and plaintiffs, through their respective counsel, that the public entity defendants’

Answers to the Seventh Amended Complaint will remain the same and applicable to the Eighth

Amended Complaint with no need by public entity defendants to file separate Answers to the Eighth

Amended Complaint.

///

///

4827-2349-1077.1 -1-

Case 1:07-cv-00388-DOC-SAB Document 646 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 3
STIPULATION DEEMING ANSWERS TO 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT SAME AS ANSWERS TO 7

TH TH

AMENDED COMPLAINT

LEWI

S

BRISBO

IS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: April 8, 2010 JOSEPH A. SALAZAR, JR.

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

/s/ Joseph A. Salazar, Jr.

By 

Joseph A. Salazar, Jr.

Attorney for FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER

DISTRICT

DATED: April 8, 2010 JEFFREY F. ONEAL

LAMORE, BRAZIER, RIDDLE & GIAMPAOLI

/s/ Jeffrey F. Oneal

By___________________________________________

Jeffrey F. Oneal

Attorney for MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT and

MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT #1

DATED: April 8, 2010 GENE TANAKA

BEST, BEST & BRIEGER

/s/ Gene Tanaka

By__________________________________________

Gene Tanaka

Attorney for CITY OF MERCED

DATED: April 8, 2010 TERRY L. ALLEN

ALLEN, PROIETTI & FAGALDE

/s/ Terry L. Allen

By____________________________________________

 Terry L. Allen

 Attorney for County of Merced 

///

///

///

///

///

4827-2349-1077.1 -2-

Case 1:07-cv-00388-DOC-SAB Document 646 Filed 04/13/10 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION DEEMING ANSWERS TO 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT SAME AS ANSWERS TO 7

TH TH

AMENDED COMPLAINT

LEWI

S

BRISBO

IS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: April 8, 2010 MICHAEL G. MARDEROSIAN

MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE, 

LEHMAN & ARMO

/s/ Michael G. Marderosian

By___________________________________________

 Michael G. Marderosian

 Attorney for Plaintiffs

 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 9, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4827-2349-1077.1 -3-

Case 1:07-cv-00388-DOC-SAB Document 646 Filed 04/13/10 Page 3 of 3