Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02740/USCOURTS-caed-2_12-cv-02740-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; ORDER

Mark H. Van Brussel, State Bar No. 80777

mvanbrussel@cdflaborlaw.com

Jeremy T. Naftel, State Bar No. 185215

jnaftel@cdflaborlaw.com

CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP

900 University Avenue

Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

Telephone: (916) 361-0991

Facsimile: (916) 570-1958

Attorneys for Defendants

BURKETT’S POOL PLASTERING, INC., 

ROBERT BURKETT and MATTHEW 

WINDORSKI

Stan S. Mallison, State Bar No. 184191

MALLISON & MARTINEZ

1939 Harrison Street, Suite 730

Oakland, California 94549

Telephone: 510-832-9999

Facsimile: 510-832-1101

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESUS DE LEON, JOSE DE JESUS 

URZUA, RUBEN GALLO, RUBEN 

GALLO, JR., JUAN MANUEL GALLO, 

CRECENSIO SANCHEZ, ALEJANDRO 

ROMO MORALES, JOSE ROBERTO 

SANTOS CASTRO, VICENTE SANTOS 

CASTRO, RICARDO TRUJILLO, LUIS 

GALLO, and MELKISEDEC BARRERA, 

on behalf of all similarly situated 

individuals,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BURKETT’S POOL PLASTERING, 

INC., ROBERT BURKETT, and 

MATTHEW WINDORSKI,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:12-CV-02740-TLN-EFB

FURTHER STIPULATION TO 

STAY ACTION; ORDER

Action Filed: November 6, 2012

Case 2:12-cv-02740-TLN-EFB Document 102 Filed 06/03/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; ORDER

RECITALS

A. This matter is set to begin trial on August 31, 2015, with a Final Pretrial 

Conference set for June 18, 2015.

B. Plaintiffs and Defendants (“the parties”) filed cross motions for partial 

summary judgment scheduled to be heard on May 7, 2015.

C. The parties have participated in mediation and have reached a settlement 

of all claims and issues presented by the above-titled lawsuit.

D. The parties wish to stay all proceedings in this matter pending the

finalization of their settlement in writing in order to avoid spending the Court’s time 

and their own on motions, hearings and deadlines that will be rendered moot once the 

settlement is consummated. The court previously took the parties’ cross motions for 

partial summary judgment, set for May 7, 2015 hearing, off calendar and ordered this 

case stayed until May 13, 2015 (Doc. 98).

E. The parties stipulated to extending the stay and the date by which the 

parties must file a stipulation of dismissal on May 11, 2015 and the Court granted the 

request on May 13, 2015 (Doc. 100).

F. The parties are in the final stages of the settlement terms to a written 

settlement agreement and require additional time to complete the settlement.

Obtaining and reviewing the data needed to calculate the pro rata shares of the 

settlement for the 18 settling parties has taken longer than counsel initially expected, 

but is now in the final stages.

STIPULATION

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereby 

stipulate to the following:

1. That all proceedings in this matter shall continue to be stayed;

2. That the parties will devote their efforts to finalizing settlement;

3. That the parties’ cross motions for partial summary judgment will 

remain off calendar;

Case 2:12-cv-02740-TLN-EFB Document 102 Filed 06/03/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; ORDER

4. That the parties shall finalize their settlement and shall, by June 15, 

2015, file with the Court a stipulation to dismiss the action;

5. That if the parties do not, by June 15, 2015, file a stipulation of 

dismissal or a stipulation for further extension of the stay, then the Court may lift the 

stay and restore the matter to the status quo ante; 

6. That if the stay is lifted, the parties’ cross motions for partial summary 

judgment shall be restored to the Court’s calendar and set for hearing for a date in 

early to mid July 2015.

7. That Defendants preserve all objections to the timeliness of Plaintiffs’ 

motion for partial summary judgment and to the timeliness of Plaintiffs’ opposition 

to Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment.

Dated: May 29, 2015 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER 

LLP

By: /s/Mark H. Van Brussel

Mark H. Van Brussel

Attorneys for Defendants

BURKETT’S POOL PLASTERING, INC.,

ROBERT BURKETT and MATTHEW 

WINDORSKI

Dated: May 29, 2015 MALLISON & MARTINEZ

By: /s/Stan S. Mallison

Stan S. Mallison

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JESUS DE LEON, et al.

Case 2:12-cv-02740-TLN-EFB Document 102 Filed 06/03/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: June 2, 2015

Case 2:12-cv-02740-TLN-EFB Document 102 Filed 06/03/15 Page 4 of 4