Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01611/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-01611-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

 MOTION TO FILE VERIFIED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT - 1

2:03-CV-01611-RRB-EFB

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. 2:03-cv-01611-RRB-EFB

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

MOTION TO FILE VERIFIED

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

At Docket 76 is Plaintiff Martha Bronson (“Plaintiff”)

with an Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and

Order to Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction to Enjoin Defendants’

Foreclosure and Sale of Plaintiff’s Home; and Request for Order

Shortening Time for Hearing on Motion to File Third Amended

Complaint. The application and request is opposed at Docket 84.

In order for the Court to meaningfully address the

Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for

Preliminary Injunction, the Court must first assert jurisdiction

MARTHA BRONSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC,

GREEN TREE HOLDING, LLC, RANDY

LAKE, and VENAE VALDEZ,

Defendants.

Case 2:03-cv-01611-JAM-EFB Document 87 Filed 06/15/07 Page 1 of 3
1 “Plaintiff . . . seeks emergency relief against nonparties that have either been dismissed with prejudice, have

obtained summary judgment, are bankrupt, or who have never been

named before.” Docket 84 at 2.

2 The Court Clerk is ordered to file Plaintiff’s Verified

Third Amended Complaint and issue the appropriate summons

forthwith.

3 Inasmuch as the Court concludes the parties have

submitted memoranda thoroughly discussing the law and evidence in

support of their positions, it further concludes oral argument is

neither necessary nor warranted with regard to the instant matter.

See Mahon v. Credit Bureau of Placer County Inc., 171 F.3d 1197,

1200 (9th Cir.1999)(explaining that if the parties provided the

district court with complete memoranda of the law and evidence in

support of their positions, ordinarily oral argument would not be

required).

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

 MOTION TO FILE VERIFIED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT - 2

2:03-CV-01611-RRB-EFB

over the necessary parties.1 Therefore, because (1) there appears

to be legitimate factual disputes and issues of law, whereby

Plaintiff has established some “likelihood” of success on the

merits; and (2) Plaintiff’s harm is potentially irreparable, the

Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Application for Order to File Verified

Third Amended Complaint and further requires the Defendants named

therein to answer the same in due course.2

Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, to

temporarily enjoin the foreclosure and sale of Plaintiff’s home, is

also GRANTED.3 More specifically, Defendants are hereby restrained

and/or enjoined from: (1) foreclosing on the Deed of Trust, dated

May 21, 1999, executed by Plaintiff, as Trustor, recorded May 28,

1999, as Instrument No. 99070688, Official Records in the Office of

the Recorder of San Joaquin County, California, describing land

Case 2:03-cv-01611-JAM-EFB Document 87 Filed 06/15/07 Page 2 of 3
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

 MOTION TO FILE VERIFIED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT - 3

2:03-CV-01611-RRB-EFB

there more commonly known as 1224 Newcastle Court, Tracy,

California, Lot 61, Ironwood Development, and as referred in the

“DEFAULT,” recorded on February 22, 2007, Document No. 2007-038969,

and referring to Loan No. 88223309 (FNA Loan No. 6903791009);

and/or (2) selling at foreclosure sale or otherwise, on June 20,

2007, or any other time, said property, located at 1224 Newcastle

Court, Tracy, California. This preliminary injunction shall remain

in full force and effect until further order of the Court.

Plaintiff shall ensure that the involved parties are provided

timely notice of this order.

ENTERED this 15th day of June, 2007.

S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:03-cv-01611-JAM-EFB Document 87 Filed 06/15/07 Page 3 of 3