Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-06567/USCOURTS-cand-3_11-cv-06567-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 152
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Default of Student Loan

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL COSENTINO SBN 83253

ATTORNEY AT LAW

PO BOX 129

ALAMEDA, CA 94501

Telephone: (510) 523-4702

Fax: (510) 747-1640

COUNSEL FOR THE UNITED STATES

OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Case NO. C11-6567 MEJ

)

 Plaintiff, ) MOTION FOR ORDER 

) EXTENDING TIME FOR DISPOSITIVE

v. ) MOTIONS TO BE FILED AND HEARD;

) ORDER THEREON

DAVID H. HATAMI, )

 ) 

 Defendant. ) Motion for Summary Judgment

 ) Filing due date: October 25, 2012

Time: 10:00 A. M.

Place: Courtroom B, 15 Floor th

Chief Magistrate Judge 

Maria-Elena James

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

MOTION FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DISPOSITIVE 

MOTIONS TO BE FILED AND HEARD; ORDER THEREON

The above entitled plaintiff, through its attorney of record, hereby moves the

court for an order extending time for dispositive motions to be filed by March 14, 2013,

to be heard on April 18, 2013. 

In its Case Management Conference order entered July 2, 2012, the court

ordered that dispositive motions shall be filed by October 25, 2012, to be heard on

November 29, 2012.

The reason for this request is that the plaintiff is unable to file its motion

Case 3:11-cv-06567-MEJ Document 16 Filed 10/29/12 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

for summary judgment by October 25, 2012, due to the workload placed on the US

Department of Education’s Loan Analysts (Custodian of Records). The Department is

3 months behind in its efforts to confirm drafts of declarations in support of motions

because, simply put, there are not enough loan analysts, all of whom are located in

San Francisco, CA, to handle the entire country’s requests for declarations timely; it is

roughly estimated that an additional 2 1⁄2 to 3 1⁄2 months is required for the declaration

to be finalized, where after the other pleadings for the motion, based upon the final

draft of the custodian’s declaration, must be drafted by counsel for plaintiff. 

On October 12, 2012, counsel for plaintiff sent an email (the attorneys have

been communicating by email immediately subsequent to the filing of defendant’s

answer) to counsel for defendant requesting that defendant stipulate to an order

extending the time by approximately 90 days for the parties to file dispositive motions.

Six days has passed and counsel for defendant has not responded to this request. 

Therefore, plaintiff submits its motion for an order extending the time for the parties to

file and have heard dispositive motions.

October 18, 2012 _____/s/________

Michael Cosentino

Counsel for plaintiff

ORDER

The foregoing motion having been considered, the matter having been 

submitted and good cause therefor,

THE COURT ORDERS THAT the order entered July 2, 2012, stating that

dispositive motions shall be filed by October 25, 2012, to be heard on November 29, 

2012, be and hereby is vacated. 

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS THAT dispositive motions shall be filed by 

March 14, 2013, to be heard on April 18, 2013.

DATED__________________ ___________________________________

 Maria-Elena James, Chief Magistrate Judge

 United States District Court

Case 3:11-cv-06567-MEJ Document 16 Filed 10/29/12 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County of Alameda, I

am over the age of eighteen and not a party to the within above-entitled action; my

business address is: PO Box 129, Alameda, CA 94501.

On October 18, 2012, I served the attached

plaintiff’s MOTION FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DISPOSITIVE 

MOTIONS TO BE FILED AND HEARD; ORDER THEREON on the parties in said

action, by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage

thereon fully prepaid, in the United States post office box at Alameda, California

addressed as follows:

Vijay K. Toke

Attorney at Law

Hiaring + Smith, LLP

101 Lucas Valley Road, Suite 300

San Rafael, CA 94903

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on October 18, 2012, at Alameda, California.

 s/s 

MICHAEL COSENTINO

Case 3:11-cv-06567-MEJ Document 16 Filed 10/29/12 Page 3 of 3