Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-04473/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-04473-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CASE NO. 4:14-CV-04473-RS

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

CHRISTOPHER J. BANKS (SBN 218779)

cbanks@morganlewis.com

One Market, Spear Street Tower

San Francisco, CA 94105-1596

Tel: 415.442.1000

Fax: 415.442.1001

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

THE ECLIPSE GROUP LLP

EDWARD F. O’CONNOR (SBN 213398)

efo@eclipsegrp.com

2020 Main Street, Suite 600

Irvine, CA 92614

Tel: 619.239.4340

Fax: 619.239.0116

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN FRANCISCO)

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

NINESTAR IMAGE TECH LIMITED, 

NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., 

and APEX MICROELECTRONICS CO., 

LTD.,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:14-cv-04473-RS

Before Judge Richard Seeborg

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE 

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

Complaint served: October 15, 2014

Current response due: February 3, 2015

New response due: March 5, 2015

Case 4:14-cv-04473-HSG Document 18 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CASE NO. 4:14-CV-04473-RS

On November 4, 2014 the parties stipulated to allow defendants until January 15, 2015 to 

respond to the complaint. [Doc. No. 10].

Subsequently, the parties began discussions to explore possible amicable resolution of this 

matter, and, in light of those discussions, filed a second stipulation, which the Court approved, 

extending the date for defendants to respond to the complaint to February 3, 2015, rescheduling 

the initial case management conference to March 19, 2015, and adjusting all other associated case 

deadlines accordingly. [Dkt. No. 16]

Because the parties have made further progress in their discussions regarding possible 

amicable resolution of this matter, the parties agree that there should be a further extension of 

approximately thirty (30) days for defendants to file an answer or other pleading in response to 

the complaint, to March 5, 2015.

The parties also agree that the initial case management conference should be continued by 

approximately one month, to April 23, 2015, and that the other case deadlines associated with the 

date to respond to the complaint and the initial case management conference should be adjusted 

accordingly. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the parties stipulate, and respectfully 

request an order from this Court, that defendants be given an extension until March 5, 2015 for 

responding to the complaint, and that the initial case management conference be continued by 

approximately one month, to April 23, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. (or 11:00 a.m. if any party files a 

request to appear by telephone), or such other time as the Court deems appropriate. All other 

deadlines associated with the date to respond to the complaint and the initial case management 

conference will be adjusted accordingly.

Case 4:14-cv-04473-HSG Document 18 Filed 02/02/15 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CASE NO. 4:14-CV-04473-RS

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Dated: January 30, 2015

By: /s/ Christopher Banks

Christopher Banks, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

THE ECLIPSE GROUP, LLP

Dated: January 30, 2015

By: /s/ Edward F. O’Connor

Edward F. O’Connor, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 4:14-cv-04473-HSG Document 18 Filed 02/02/15 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 

COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE INITIAL 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CASE NO. 4:14-CV-04473-RS

ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any 

signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Dated: January __, 2015

By: /s/ Christopher Banks

Christopher Banks, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 4:14-cv-04473-HSG Document 18 Filed 02/02/15 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 4:14-CV-04473-RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed the parties’ stipulation submitted pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the 

Court hereby grants the stipulated request to extend the deadline for defendants to respond to the 

Complaint to March 5, 2015. Further, the Court hereby grants the stipulated request to extend the 

deadline for the initial case management conference by approximately one month, to April 23, 

2015, at 10:00 a.m. (or 11:00 a.m. if any party files a request to appear by telephone). All other 

deadlines associated with the date to respond to the complaint and the initial case management 

conference are adjusted accordingly.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: ____________ ____________________________

The Honorable Richard Seeborg

1/30/2015

Case 4:14-cv-04473-HSG Document 18 Filed 02/02/15 Page 5 of 5