Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05203/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-05203-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE

Case No. 13-CV-05203-JST

Joseph W. Carcione, Jr., Esq. (State Bar No. 56693)

Joshua S. Markowitz, Esq. (State Bar No. 224256)

CARCIONE, CATTERMOLE, DOLINSKI,

STUCKY, MARKOWITZ & CARCIONE, L.L.P.

1300 S. El Camino Real, Suite 300

San Mateo, CA 94402

Telephone: (650) 367-6811

Facsimile: (650) 367-0367

Aaron B. Markowitz, Esq. (Cal. SBN 220694)

MARKOWITZ LAW GROUP

501 Stockton Ave, Ste. 105

San Jose, CA 95126

Telephone: (408) 642-5937

Facsimile: (408) 516-9576

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

THOMAS R. BEER (SBN 148175)

PETER J. FELSENFELD (SBN 260433)

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

One California Street, 18th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415-362-6000

Facsimile: 415-834-9070

Attorneys for Defendants RÖHM GmbH; RÖHM PRODUCTS OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ARTHUR R. YOST, JR.; ERIKA YOST; and 

ENERGY CONCEPTS, INC., 

Plaintiff,

vs.

RÖHM GmbH; RÖHM PRODUCTS OF 

AMERICA; and DOES 3 to 10,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 13-CV-05203-JST

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE RÖHM 

ENTITIES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

ADJUDICATION HEARING DATE AND 

OPPOSITION AND REPLY DEADLINES

First Amended Complaint Filed: June 17, 2014

Date: October 22, 2015

Time: 2:00 P.M.

Courtroom 9, 19th Floor

Case 3:13-cv-05203-JST Document 50 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE

Case No. 13-CV-05203-JST

THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

The present hearing date on Röhm’s motion for adjudication, presently set for October 22, 

2015 at 2:00 P.M. in Courtroom 9 will be continued to December 3, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 

9.

Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion, presently due on September 29, 2015, will be due on 

November 10, 2015.

Röhm’s reply to the opposition, presently due on October 6, 2015, will be due on November 

17, 2015.

The statutory deadline to file and hear dispositive motions in this case will be continued until 

after the hearing on Röhm’s motion for adjudiciation, or the new date of December 3, 2015, 

presently requested.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

Dated: September 29, 2015 MARKOWITZ LAW GROUP

By: /s/ Aaron Markowitz

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: September 29, 2015 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

By: /s/ Thomas R. Beer

Attorneys for Defendants

FILER’S ATTESTATION

I, Aaron B. Markowitz, Esq., am the ECF user whose identification and password are being 

used to file this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Hearing Date. In compliance 

with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all party signatories hereto concur in this filing.

//s// Aaron Markowitz 

[Name]

Case 3:13-cv-05203-JST Document 50 Filed 09/29/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE

Case No. 13-CV-05203-JST

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND RESPONSE DEADLINES

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and finding good cause for this order, the Court finds

as follows:

Defendants Röhm’s motion for adjudication, presently set for October 22, 2015 at 2:00 P.M. 

in Courtroom 9 will be continued to December 3, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 9.

Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion, presently due on September 29, 2015, will be due on 

November 10, 2015.

Röhm’s reply to the opposition, presently due on October 6, 2015, will be due on November 

17, 2015.

The statutory deadline to file and hear dispositive motions in this case will be continued until 

after the hearing on Röhm’s motion for adjudiciation, or the new date of December 3, 2015, 

presently requested.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________ ____________________________________

Hon. Jon S. Tigar, District Court Judge

September 29, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar 

December 1, 2015

Case 3:13-cv-05203-JST Document 50 Filed 09/29/15 Page 3 of 3