Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-05944-151/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 07-5944-SC; MDL No. 1917

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Calvin L. Litsey (SBN 289659)

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP

1950 University Avenue, Suite 450

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2279

Telephone: +1 650 324-6700

Facsimile: +1 650 324-6701 

calvin.litsey@FaegreBD.com

Kathy L. Osborn (pro hac vice) 

Ryan M. Hurley (pro hac vice) 

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP

300 N. Meridian Street, Suite 2700

Indianapolis, IN 46204

Telephone: +1 317-237-0300

Facsimile: +1 317-237-1000

kathy.osborn@FaegreBD.com

ryan.hurley@FaegreBD.com

Jeffrey S. Roberts (pro hac vice) 

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP

3200 Wells Fargo

1700 Lincoln Street

Denver, CO 80203

Telephone: +1 303 607 3500

Facsimile: +1 303 607 3600

jeff.roberts@FaegreBD.com

Attorneys for Defendants Thomson S.A. and 

Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Sharp Electronics Corp. et al. v. Hitachi, 

Ltd. Et al., No. 13-cv-01173

No. 07-cv-5944-SC

MDL No. 1917

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE

[DECLARATION OF JEFFREY S. ROBERTS 

FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH]

Judge: Hon. Samuel Conti

Special Master: Hon. Charles A. Legge (Ret.)

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1869 Filed 08/27/13 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 Case No. 07-5944-SC; MDL No. 1917

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corporation and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing 

Company of America, Inc. (collectively, “Sharp”) and Defendant Thomson S.A. enter into this 

Stipulation concerning the matter entitled Sharp Electronics Corp. et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al., No. 

13-cv-01173, which was related to In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation, No. 07-cv05944, by an Order of Judge Samuel Conti on March 26, 2013. 

SUBJECT TO THE COURT’S APPROVAL, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND 

AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on March 15, 2013, Sharp filed a complaint in the Northern District of 

California alleging antitrust violations by manufacturers, distributors and sellers of CRT and CRT 

Products, captioned Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 13-cv-01173 (the 

“Sharp Complaint”);

WHEREAS, on May 24, 2013, Sharp and Thomson S.A. entered into a stipulation 

extending Thomson S.A.’s time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Sharp Complaint to 

July 3, 2013 [Dkt. No. 1690];

WHEREAS, Thomson S.A. filed a Motion to Dismiss the Sharp Complaint on July 

3, 2013 [Dkt. No. 1765] (“Motion to Dismiss”);

WHEREAS, on July 12, 2013, Sharp and Thomson S.A. entered into a stipulation 

extending the deadline for Sharp to file its opposition to the Motion to Dismiss until July 31, 2013, 

and to extend the deadline for Thomson S.A. to file a reply to Sharp’s opposition to the Motion to 

Dismiss until August 14, 2013 [Dkt. No. 1771];

WHEREAS, on July 15, 2013, an order was entered granting the stipulation of Sharp 

and Thomson S.A. extending the deadline for Sharp’s opposition brief and Thomson S.A.’s reply 

brief [Dkt. No. 1775];

WHEREAS, on July 24, 2013, Sharp and Thomson S.A. entered into a stipulation 

further extending the deadline for Sharp to file its opposition to the Motion to Dismiss until August 

7, 2013, and extending the deadline for Thomson S.A. to file a reply to Sharp’s opposition to the 

Motion to Dismiss until August 21, 2013 [Dkt. No. 1795];

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1869 Filed 08/27/13 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 Case No. 07-5944-SC; MDL No. 1917

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE

WHEREAS, on July 29, 2013, an order was entered granting the stipulation of Sharp 

and Thomson S.A. extending the deadline for Sharp’s opposition brief and Thomson S.A.’s reply 

brief [Dkt. No. 1806].

NOW, THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(b), SHARP AND 

THOMSON CONSUMER, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF 

RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The deadline for Thomson S.A. to file a reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss

shall be extended until August 28, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: August 16, 2013 By: /s/ Calvin L. Litsey

Calvin L. Litsey (SBN 289659)

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP

1950 University Avenue, Suite 450

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2279

Telephone: +1 650 324-6700

Facsimile: +1 650 324-6701 

calvin.litsey@FaegreBD.com

Kathy L. Osborn (pro hac vice) 

Ryan M. Hurley (pro hac vice) 

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP

300 N. Meridian Street, Suite 2700

Indianapolis, IN 46204

Telephone: +1 317-237-0300

Facsimile: +1 317-237-1000

kathy.osborn@FaegreBD.com

ryan.hurley@FaegreBD.com

Jeffrey S. Roberts (pro hac vice) 

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP

3200 Wells Fargo

1700 Lincoln Street

Denver, CO 80203

Telephone: +1 303 607 3500

Facsimile: +1 303 607 3600

jeff.roberts@FaegreBD.com

Attorneys for Defendants Thomson S.A.

and Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1869 Filed 08/27/13 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 Case No. 07-5944-SC; MDL No. 1917

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE

By: /s/ Craig A. Benson

Stephen E. Taylor (SBN 058452)

Jonathan A. Patchen (SBN 237346)

TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP

One Ferry Building, Suite 355

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 788-8200

Facsimile: (415) 788-8208

Email: staylor@tcolaw.com

Email: jpatchen@tcolaw.com

Kenneth A. Gallo (Pro Hac Vice)

Joseph J. Simons (Pro Hac Vice)

Craig A. Benson (Pro Hac Vice)

PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP

2001 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006-1047

Telephone: (202) 223-7300

Facsimile: (202) 223-7420

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corp. and 

Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of 

America, Inc.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this 

document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

Dated: August 16, 2013

By: /s/ Calvin L. Litsey

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August , 2013

27

Case 3:07-cv-05944-JST Document 1869 Filed 08/27/13 Page 4 of 4