Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00211/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-00211-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 - 1 -

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Tech Spray, L.P., et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) No. CV-07-0211-PHX-PGR

)

vs. )

) ORDER

Grant Russell, et ux., )

)

Defendants. ) )

In a complaint filed on January 30, 2007, the plaintiffs allege that the Court

has subject matter jurisdiction over this action solely pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1332. Having reviewed the complaint, the Court finds that the jurisdictional

allegations therein are insufficient as a matter of law to establish the existence of 

diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. The Court will therefore require the plaintiffs to

file an amended complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1653.

The complaint does not properly allege the citizenship of either plaintiff. 

First, the complaint alleges that plaintiff Tech Spray L.P. is a Texas limited

partnership with its principal place of business in Amarillo, Texas. This allegation

is insufficient because to properly plead diversity jurisdiction when a partnership

Case 2:07-cv-00211-PGR Document 8 Filed 02/05/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 While the complaint also alleges that co-plaintiff ITW Tech Spray L.L.C. "owns all of

the partnership interest in Tech Spray L.P.", that allegation needs to be further explained

for purposes of diversity jurisdiction since the Court notes that under Texas law a limited

partnership must have at least two partners.

- 2 -

is a named party, the complaint must affirmatively allege the citizenship of all

partners, both general and limited, since a partnership is not a "citizen" for

purposes of § 1332.1

 Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185, 110 S.Ct.

1015 (1990).

Second, the complaint alleges that co-plaintiff ITW Tech Spray L.L.C. is a

Delaware corporation with its principal business office in Glenview, Illinois. This

allegation is insufficient because a limited liability company is not treated as a

corporation for purposes of determining whether diversity exists under § 1332.

Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006)

("Notwithstanding LLCs' corporate traits, ... every circuit that has addressed the

question treats them like partnerships for the purposes of diversity jurisdiction. ...

We therefore join our sister circuits and hold that, like a partnership, an LLC is a

citizen of every state of which its owners/members are citizens.") 

In order to cure these pleading deficiencies, the Court will require the

plaintiffs to file an amended complaint that affirmatively identifies each partner of

Tech Spray, L.P. and each member of ITW Tech Spray, L.L.C., and affirmatively

states the citizenship of each partner and member. The plaintiffs are advised that

their failure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this

action without further notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint properly

Case 2:07-cv-00211-PGR Document 8 Filed 02/05/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 - 3 -

alleging a jurisdictional basis for this action no later than February 23, 2007.

DATED this 5th day of February, 2007.

Case 2:07-cv-00211-PGR Document 8 Filed 02/05/07 Page 3 of 3