Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-02096/USCOURTS-azd-2_10-cv-02096-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Eugene Boyd Johnson, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

The State of Arizona, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-10-2096-PHX-GMS

ORDER

On June 25, 2012, after considering Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,

Respondent’s Answer, and Magistrate Judge Logan’s Report and Recommendations (“R &

R”), the Court denied the petition. (Doc. 30). The factual background and legal issues in this

case are all set forth in the order denying the Petition, and will not be repeated here. On July

10, Petitioner submitted a “Second Response and Objections” to the R & R, which was

identical in all material respects to his first set of objections. (Doc. 32). The Court interpreted

this Second Response and Objections as a motion for reconsideration and on July 27, 2012,

denied the motion. (Doc. 33). On August 9, 2012, Petitioner submitted a “Third Response

and Objections” which is identical in all material respects to both the first set of objections

and to his Second Response and Objections. (Doc. 34). Again, the Court will interpret this

filing as a motion for reconsideration, and will, for the reasons set forth in its July 27th

Order, deny this motion.

/ / /

Case 2:10-cv-02096-GMS Document 35 Filed 09/10/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 34).

This case shall remain closed.

DATED this 10th day of September, 2012.

Case 2:10-cv-02096-GMS Document 35 Filed 09/10/12 Page 2 of 2