Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02339/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-02339-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BILLY ROBERT COOK, MICHAEL 

JOHN MAROULAS, and BECKY 

SMISEK-GAGE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, a 

municipal corporation; FORMER 

CITY OF FAIRFIELD POLICE 

CHIEF WALT TIBBET, in his 

individual and official 

capacities; REBECCA BELK and 

AARON BERTSCH, individually 

and in their official 

capacities as police 

sergeants for the City of 

Fairfield, FRANK PIRO, KELLY 

ROMBACH, MARK APLEY, ADAM 

BRUNIE, CHRISTOPHER GRIMM, 

KEITH PULSIPHER, and DOES 1-

50, individually and in their 

capacities as peace officers,

Defendants.

No. 2:15-cv-02339-GEB-KJN

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS 

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) 

CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M) 

NOTICE

Pursuant to the Amended Stipulation and Proposed Order 

Continuing Case Management Conference filed on December 30, 2015, 

(ECF No. 7), the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is 

continued to March 14, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report 

shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the 

Status Conference.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Further, Plaintiffs are notified under Rule 4(m) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendants 

Walt Tibbet, Rebecca Belk, Aaron Bertsch, Frank Piro, Kelly 

Rombach, Mark Apley, Adam Brunie, Christopher Grimm, and Keith 

Pulsipher with process within the time period prescribed in that 

Rule may result in the unserved defendant(s) being dismissed. To 

avoid dismissal, on or before March 28, 2016, Plaintiffs shall 

file proof of service for these defendants or a sufficient 

explanation why service was not completed within Rule 4(m)’s 

prescribed service period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2016