Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04358/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04358-25/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 240
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 42:9601 CERCLA

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN SCHAEFFER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GREGORY VILLAGE PARTNERS, L.P., et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-04358-JST 

ORDER RE REQUEST FOR

CLARIFICATION AND ORDER RE 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Re: ECF Nos. 229, 234

Now before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Request for Clarification of Order Regarding 

Documents Listed on Defendants Gregory Village Partners, L.P. and VPI, Inc.’s Privilege Log, 

ECF No. 229, and Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 234. The Court now rules 

as follows regarding these various requests. 

Plaintiffs’ Request for Clarification

Plaintiffs’ first request, that the Court set a deadline for the production of the documents 

identified in its order of May 27, 2015, is granted. All such documents shall be produced by June 

10, 2015. (The Court understands from Gregory Village’s response to Plaintiffs’ request, ECF 

No. 232, that the documents have already been produced.) 

Plaintiffs’ second request, that the Court order the production of other documents not listed 

on the privilege log, is denied. As described in the Court’s prior orders, the Court has now 

resolved disputes concerning a sample of documents listed on the privilege log to give the parties 

guidance regarding likely rulings on other documents. The parties must now meet and confer 

regarding any remaining disputes regarding other documents on the log. See, e.g., ECF No. 104 at 

3. If their meet and confer efforts are unsuccessful, they will submit their disputes to a Special 

Master. ECF No. 227 at 3-4. 

Case 3:13-cv-04358-JST Document 235 Filed 06/03/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration

Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration asks the Court to reconsider its ruling regarding a 

single document on the privilege log, Document Number 866. Plaintiffs must file either an 

opposition to the motion or a statement of non-opposition by June 11, 2015. The hearing set for 

July 9, 2015 is vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 3, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-04358-JST Document 235 Filed 06/03/15 Page 2 of 2