Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05645/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05645-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

KRISTI C. KAPETAN

Assistant United States Attorney

2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401

Fresno, California 93721

Telephone: (559) 497-4000

Facsimile: (559) 497-4099

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES KEEN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

AMY NOBLE, et. al., )

)

Defendants. )

 )

1:04-cv-05645-AWI-WMW P

EX PARTE REQUEST TO EXTEND

DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO

OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ORDER THEREON

 

The United States of America requests an extension of time

for Defendants Amy Noble, Paul Schultz and Robert Haro (“BOP

Defendants”) to Reply to the Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion

to Dismiss, or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment, based

on the following:

1. Counsel for the United States has been out of the

office defending several depositions in a civil case for the last

week and has not had time to coordinate a response to the

Opposition.

2. Agency counsel for the Board of Prisons is in the

process of obtaining an additional declaration that sets out that

the remedy Plaintiff seeks in his lawsuit is already available

and therefore that this case is moot.

Case 1:04-cv-05645-AWI-WMW Document 52 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2

3. In order to assist the Court in its analysis of this

case, Defendant intends to file a reply and respectfully requests

an additional two weeks, up to an including August 1, 2006, to

file a reply. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: July 18, 2006 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Kristi C. Kapetan

Kristi C. Kapetan

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the United

States of America

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendants’ time to file a reply to

the Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and/or for

Summary Judgment is extended to August 1, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 24, 2006 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

j14hj0 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05645-AWI-WMW Document 52 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 2