Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02081/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02081-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX

MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,

 /

This document relates to:

Albertha Anderson, 06-2081 CRB

___________________________________/

No. MDL 05-01699 CRB

ORDER RE: MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL AND FOR

PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

Now pending for decision is the motion of the law firm of Beasley, Allen, Crow,

Methvin, Portis and Miles P.C. to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff. After carefully

considering the motion, and the supporting affidavit filed under seal, the Court ORDERS

PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE as to why (1) Beasley, Allen’s motion to withdraw should

not be granted; and (2) plaintiff’s lawsuit should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. If plaintiff wishes to contest the withdrawal of counsel and/or

dismissal of the plaintiff’s lawsuit for failure to prosecute, plaintiff shall notify the Court in

writing on or before February 26, 2007 of the reasons the withdrawal should not be granted

or the case dismissed. In particular, if plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, she shall

advise the Court of the name and address of her new counsel or, if she will be representing

herself, she must advise the Court of her current contact information. Plaintiff is warned that 

Case 3:06-cv-02081-CRB Document 56 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\showcauseorders\Beasleyosc.wpd 2

her failure to communicate with the Court in writing as set forth above may result in 

dismissal of her action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 13, 2007 /s/ 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-02081-CRB Document 56 Filed 02/13/07 Page 2 of 2