Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-02625/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-02625-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING

Jeffrey H. Lowenthal (State Bar No. 111763)

Dana M. Andreoli (State Bar No. 262068)

Cody T. Stroman (State Bar No. 303413)

STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS

ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP

235 Pine Street, 15th Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 421-3400

Facsimile: (415) 421-2234

E-mail: jlowenthal@steyerlaw.com

dandreoli@steyerlaw.com

cstroman@steyerlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant

Double AA Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NIRAL PATEL, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOUBLE AA CORPORATION, a 

California Corporation, and DOES 1-20,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:19-cv-02625

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REGARDING RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

DEADLINE AND PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION HEARING

 -HSG

Case 4:19-cv-02625-HSG Document 18 Filed 06/14/19 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING

Plaintiff Niral Patel (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Double AA Corporation (“Defendant”) 

(collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate 

and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Complaint on May 14, 2019 and served it on Defendant on 

May 21, 2019, making Defendant’s responsive pleading currently due June 11, 2019.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed an Application for Preliminary Injunction on May 31, 2019 

and the hearing on Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary Injunction is currently set for July 8, 

2019 at 9:30 am in this Court.

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to mediate this matter and to the following schedule 

for the filing of Defendant’s responsive pleading and briefing and hearing for the Preliminary 

Injunction:

1. Defendant’s responsive pleading is due on September 16, 2019; 

2. The Parties request that Court set the hearing for Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary 

Injunction on, or after, October 1, 2019, but not the week of October 14, 2019, to allow 

the Parties time to mediate this matter;

3. Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary Injunction will be due 30 

days prior to the date set by the Court for the hearing on Plaintiff’s Application for 

Preliminary Injunction; and

4. Plaintiff’s reply for Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary Injunction will be due 15 days 

prior to the date set by the Court for the hearing on Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary 

Injunction.

WHEREAS, Defendant agrees to not take any action against Plaintiff and to maintain the 

status quo pending the outcome of the mediation and, if necessary, the Court’s ruling on 

Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary Injunction.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the Parties, by and 

through their respective attorneys of records, that the dates and deadlines listed above be set by 

the Court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 4:19-cv-02625-HSG Document 18 Filed 06/14/19 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING

Dated: June 10, 2019 STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS

ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP

By:_/s/ Jeffrey H. Lowenthal_____________

Jeffrey H. Lowenthal

Dana M. Andreoli

Cody T. Stroman

Attorneys for Defendant

Double AA Corporation

Dated: June 10, 2019 LAGARIAS, NAPELL & DILLON, LLP

By:_/s/ Peter C. Lagarias__________

Peter C. Lagarias

Bruce J. Napell

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Niral Patel

Case 4:19-cv-02625-HSG Document 18 Filed 06/14/19 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING

Attestation

Pursuant to Northern District L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I hereby attest that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I 

declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of American that the 

foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: June 10, 2019 STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS

ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP

By:_/s/ Jeffrey H. Lowenthal____________

Jeffrey H. Lowenthal

Dana M. Andreoli

Cody T. Stroman

Attorneys for Defendant

Double AA Corporation

Case 4:19-cv-02625-HSG Document 18 Filed 06/14/19 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING 

AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, that the following dates and 

deadlines be set in regards to Defendant’s responsive pleading and Plaintiff’s Application for 

Preliminary Injunction:

1. Defendant’s responsive pleading is due on September 16, 2019; 

2. The hearing on Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary Injunction shall be held on 

_______________;

3. Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary Injunction is due 30 days 

prior to the date set by the Court for the hearing on Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary 

Injunction; and

4. Plaintiff’s reply for Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary Injunction will is due 15 days 

prior to the date set by the Court for the hearing on Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary 

Injunction.

5. As stipulated by the parties, Defendant agrees to not take any action against Plaintiff and 

to maintain the status quo pending the outcome of the mediation and, if necessary, the 

Court’s ruling on Plaintiff’s Application for Preliminary Injunction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________ ___________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6/14/2019 October 24, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.; 

Case 4:19-cv-02625-HSG Document 18 Filed 06/14/19 Page 5 of 5