Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05373/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-05373-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV14-05373-TEH

sf-3609210

WILLIAM L. STERN (CA SBN 96105)

WStern@mofo.com

KEVIN COLES (CA SBN 271518)

KColes@mofo.com

LAUREN WROBLEWSKI (CA SBN 291019)

LWroblewski@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

KIMBERLY R. GOSLING (CA SBN 247803)

KGosling@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

12531 High Bluff Drive

San Diego, California 92130

Telephone: 858.720.5100

Facsimile: 858.720.5125

Attorneys for Defendant

LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DANA GOLD, TAMMY EMERY, EDWIN 

MENDEZ, CHRISTOPHER MASSARO, 

RUSSELL DORNON, LAURA NORRIS, JOHN 

FOSTER, DONALD FURSMAN, and JOHN 

TRIANA, on behalf of themselves and all others 

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; and DOES 1 through 200, inclusive,

Defendant.

Case No. CV14-05373-TEH

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION EXTENDING 

TIME TO RESPOND TO 

SECOND AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

Judge: The Honorable Thelton E. 

Henderson

Case 3:14-cv-05373-RS Document 60 Filed 01/06/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV14-05373-TEH

sf-3609210

1

Plaintiffs Dana Gold, Tammy Emery, Edwin Mendez, Christopher Massaro, Russell 

Dornan, Laura Norris, John Foster, Donald Fursman, and John Triana (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated, and Defendant LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC. 

(“Defendant”), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows pursuant to L.R. 6-

1(a):

WHEREAS, on December 16, 2015, Plaintiffs filed the Second Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, the period during which Defendant has to respond to the SAC covers two 

significant holidays;

WHEREAS, the parties are also discussing next steps in the litigation, such as a discovery 

schedule, and jointly believe that, in the interest of the Court’s and parties’ efficiency, 

Defendant’s deadline to respond to the SAC should be extended;

WHEREAS, the parties jointly agree that Defendant’s deadline to respond shall be 

extended to January 25, 2016;

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that: 

1. Defendant shall have until January 25, 2016, to respond to Plaintiffs’ Second 

Amended Complaint.

2. Plaintiffs intend to file either an Amendment to the Second Amended Complaint, 

or a Third Amended Complaint, on or before January 22, 2016, which shall dismiss the pending 

claims of Russel Dornan and John Foster (the Ohio class representatives), and remove language 

the Court has decided constitutes “ puffery” pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting in Part and 

Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss; Denying Defendant’s Motion to Strike; Denying 

Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice, filed November 30, 2015.

3. Defendant agrees to not oppose the filing of either an Third Amended Complaint 

or Amendment to the Second Amended Complaint.

4. Defendant agrees that in exchange for the actions set forth in paragraph 2 above, 

Defendant will answer either the Second Amended Complaint as amended, or the Third Amended 

Case 3:14-cv-05373-RS Document 60 Filed 01/06/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV14-05373-TEH

sf-3609210

2

Complaint. The deadline for Defendant’s answer to such an amended pleading will be either 

January 25, 2016, or 14 days after the amended pleading, whichever is later.

Dated: December 31, 2015 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Kimberly R. Gosling

KIMBERLY R. GOSLING

Attorneys for Defendant LUMBER 

LIQUIDATORS, INC.

Dated: December 31, 2015 RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO & 

KOPCZYNSKI LLP

By: /s/ Jeffrey B. Cereghino

JEFFREY B. CEREGHINO

Attorneys for Plaintiffs DANA GOLD, 

TAMMY EMERY, EDWIN MENDEZ, 

and CHRISTOPHER MASSARO

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson

1/06/2016

Case 3:14-cv-05373-RS Document 60 Filed 01/06/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV14-05373-TEH

sf-3609210

3

ECF ATTESTATION

I, Kimberly R. Gosling, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file 

the following: STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND 

AMENDED COMPLAINT. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Jeffrey B. 

Cereghino has concurred in this filing.

Dated: December 31, 2015 By: /s/ Kimberly R. Gosling

KIMBERLY R. GOSLING

Case 3:14-cv-05373-RS Document 60 Filed 01/06/16 Page 4 of 4