Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01132/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01132-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO FAHIE, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

H. TYSON, et al.,

Defendants. 

 /

1:06-cv-01132-AWI-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 14)

ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff Antonio Fahie (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 10, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings

and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. To date,

plaintiff has not filed any objection to the Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.

//

Case 1:06-cv-01132-GSA Document 20 Filed 07/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 10, 2007,

is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s amended

complaint, filed October 13, 2006, against defendant Correa for

use of excessive physical force, in violation of the Eighth

Amendment;

3. Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against any defendant

other than Correa, and plaintiff’s due process, conspiracy, and

state law tort claims are DISMISSED, with prejudice, for failure

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and,

4. Defendants Rios, Morales, Tyson, Smith, and Gricewich

are DISMISSED from this action based on plaintiff’s failure to

state any claims upon which relief may be granted against them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 30, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01132-GSA Document 20 Filed 07/02/07 Page 2 of 2