Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02826/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02826-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD CARRILLO, No. 2:14-cv-2826-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

SALTAINIAN, et a.,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(c) and no other party has been served or appeared in the action. The court issued an order to

show cause on June 8, 2016, requiring plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be

dismissed for failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an

amended complaint may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to

comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, plaintiff has not filed a

response to the order to show cause or an amended complaint.1 

1 Although it appears from the file that the order was returned, the parties were

properly served. It is the responsibility of the parties to keep the court apprised of their address

1

Case 2:14-cv-02826-CMK Document 11 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

The undersigned therefore finds it appropriate to dismiss this action for plaintiff’s

failure to comply to court orders, and failure to file an amended complaint. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 

DATED: October 12, 2016

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

of record at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address

of the party is fully effective.

2

Case 2:14-cv-02826-CMK Document 11 Filed 10/13/16 Page 2 of 2