Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06746/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-06746-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on November 29, 2005, as 1

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender -Refused. However, service at a party’s

prior address is fully effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BILLY LOUIS BOOKER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

R/N M. ROSE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:03-cv-06746-OWW-DLB-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 34)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 33)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

ORDER CONCLUDING ENTIRE ACTION

Plaintiff, Billy Louis Booker (“plaintiff”), is a state

prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On November 18, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30)

days. To date, the parties have not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:03-cv-06746-OWW -DLB Document 36 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 18,

2005, are ADOPTED in full;

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed March

16, 2005, is GRANTED;

3. The Clerk enter judgment for defendants and against

plaintiff; and,

4. This action is therefore CONCLUDED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 25, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-06746-OWW -DLB Document 36 Filed 01/31/06 Page 2 of 2