Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04275/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-04275-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

HENRY C. BUNSOW (SBN 060707)

BUNSOW, DE MORY, SMITH, & ALLISON LLP 

351 California Street, Suite 200 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 426-4747 

Facsimile: (415) 426-4744 

Email: hbunsow@bdiplaw.com 

JOHN D. BEYNON (SBN 233581) 

BUNSOW, DE MORY, SMITH, & ALLISON LLP 

600 Allerton Street, Suite 101 

Redwood City, CA 94063 

Telephone: (650) 351-7248 

Facsimile: (650) 351-7253 

Email: jbeynon@bdiplaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

LONGITUDE LICENSING LTD. AND 

LONGITUDE FLASH MEMORY 

SYSTEMS S.À.R.L 

JOHN ALLCOCK, Bar No. 98895

john.allcock@dlapiper.com 

SEAN CUNNINGHAM, Bar No. 174931 

sean.cunningham@dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

401 B Street, Suite 1700 

San Diego, CA 92101-4297 

Phone: (619) 699-2700 

Fax: (619) 699-2701 

BRENT YAMASHITA, Bar No. 206890 

brent.yamashita@dlapiper.com 

CHRISTINE K. CORBETT, Bar No. 209128 

christine.corbett@dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

2000 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 

Tel: 650.833.2000 

Fax: 650.833.2001 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

LONGITUDE LICENSING LTD., and

LONGITUDE FLASH MEMORY 

SYSTEMS S.A.R.L., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

APPLE INC., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-4275 EDL 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

REGARDING THE DISCLOSURE AND 

USE OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS 

Plaintiffs Longitude Licensing Ltd. and Longitude Flash Memory Systems S.A.R.L. 

(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively “the Parties”) anticipate that 

documents, testimony, or information containing or reflecting confidential, proprietary, trade 

secret, and/or commercially sensitive information are likely to be disclosed or produced during 

the course of discovery, initial disclosures, and supplemental disclosures in this case and request 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

that the Court enter this Order setting forth the conditions for treating, obtaining, and using such 

information. Accordingly, the parties jointly stipulate to the following protective order, and 

request that the Court enter it. 

Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds good cause 

for the following Agreed Protective Order Regarding the Disclosure and Use of Discovery 

Materials (“Order” or “Protective Order”). 

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 

 (a) Protected Material designated under the terms of this Protective Order shall 

be used by a Receiving Party solely for this case, and shall not be used directly or indirectly for 

any other purpose whatsoever. 

 (b) The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 

protections on all disclosures during discovery, or in the course of making initial or supplemental 

disclosures under Rule 26(a). Designations under this Order shall be made with care and shall not 

be made absent a good faith belief that the designated material satisfies the criteria set forth 

below. If it comes to a Producing Party’s attention that designated material does not qualify for 

protection at all, or does not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, the Producing 

Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing or changing the designation. 

 (c) The terms agreed hereto do not limit the Parties from requesting that other 

provisions or procedures should apply to Protected Materials during trial. 

2. DEFINITIONS 

 (a) “Discovery Material” means all items or information, including from any 

non party, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, 

among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced, disclosed, or 

generated in connection with discovery or Rule 26(a) disclosures in this case. 

 (b) “Outside Counsel” means (i) outside counsel who appear on the pleadings 

as counsel for a Party and (ii) partners, associates, and staff of such counsel to whom it is 

reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation. 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 2 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

 (c) “Patents-in-suit” means U.S. Patent Nos. 6,763,424, 7,970,987, 8,316,177, 

6,968,421, 7,657,702, 7,818,490, 7,012,835, 7,224,607, 8,050,095, 6,510,488, 7,181,611, 

6,831,865 and 7,120,729, and any other patent asserted in this action, as well as any related 

patents, patent applications, provisional patent applications, continuations, and/or divisionals. 

 (d) “Party” means any party to this case, including all of its officers, directors, 

employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel and their support staffs. 

 (e) “Producing Party” means any Party or non-party that discloses or produces 

any Discovery Material in this case. 

 (f) “Protected Material” means any Discovery Material that is designated as 

“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE,” as 

provided for in this Order. Protected Material shall not include: (i) advertising materials that have 

been actually published or publicly disseminated; and (ii) materials that show on their face they 

have been disseminated to the public. 

 (g) “Receiving Party” means any Party who receives Discovery Material from 

a Producing Party. 

 (h) “Source Code” means computer code, scripts, assembly, object code, 

source code listings and descriptions of source code, object code listings and descriptions of 

object code, source code comments and Hardware Description Language (HDL) or Register 

Transfer Level (RTL) files that describe the hardware design of any ASIC or other chip. 

3. COMPUTATION OF TIME 

The computation of any period of time prescribed or allowed by this Order shall be 

governed by the provisions for computing time set forth in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6. 

4. SCOPE 

 (a) The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Discovery Material 

governed by this Order as addressed herein, but also any information copied or extracted 

therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 3 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-4-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

conversations, or presentations by Parties or their counsel in court or in other settings that might 

reveal Protected Material. 

 (b) Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing 

Party’s own disclosure or use of its own Protected Material for any purpose, and nothing in this 

Order shall preclude any Producing Party from showing its Protected Material to an individual 

who prepared the Protected Material. 

 (c) Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prejudice any Party’s right to 

use any Protected Material in court or in any court filing with the consent of the Producing Party 

or by order of the Court. 

 (d) This Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party to seek further or 

additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify this Order in any way, including, 

without limitation, an order that certain matter not be produced at all. 

5. DURATION 

Even after the termination of this case, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 

Order shall remain in effect until a Producing Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 

otherwise directs. 

6. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

 (a) Basic Principles. All Protected Material shall be used solely for this case or 

any related appellate proceeding, and not for any other purpose whatsoever, including without 

limitation any other litigation, patent prosecution or acquisition, patent reexamination or reissue 

proceedings, or any business or competitive purpose or function. Protected Material shall not be 

distributed, disclosed or made available to anyone except as expressly provided in this Order. 

 (b) Patent Prosecution Bar. Absent the written consent of the Producing Party, 

any person who receives one or more items designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” shall not be involved, directly or indirectly, in any of the 

following activities: (i) advising on, consulting on, preparing, prosecuting, drafting, editing, 

and/or amending of patent applications, specifications, claims, and/or responses to office actions, 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 4 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-5-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

or otherwise affecting the scope of claims (in patents or patent applications) directed to 

implementing a flash translation layer, wear leveling, fast startup routines or data scrubbing in a 

flash memory system, before any foreign or domestic agency, including the United States Patent 

and Trademark Office; and (ii) the acquisition of patents (including patent applications), or the 

rights to any such patents or patent applications with the right to sublicense, relating to the 

functionality, operation, and design of flash memory systems. These prohibitions are not 

intended to and shall not preclude counsel from participating in reexamination or inter partes

review proceedings on behalf of a Party challenging the validity of any patent, and these 

prohibitions are not intended to and shall not preclude counsel for Plaintiff from participating in 

reexamination or inter partes review proceedings to discuss the scope and content of prior art 

with prosecution counsel, however, in no event will the discussions with prosecution counsel 

include any reference, mention, or disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 

OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES’ ONLY - SOURCE CODE” materials of a Party or Non-Party. 

Any individual with access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” 

will not be involved in the drafting, revising, or amending of any claims, or be involved in any 

discussions regarding the drafting, revising, or amending of any claims, in any reexamination or 

inter partes review proceeding. These prohibitions shall begin when access to “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –OUTSIDE 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” materials are first received by the affected 

individual, and shall end two (2) years after the final resolution of this action, including all 

appeals. 

 (c) Secure Storage. Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a 

Receiving Party at a location in the United States and in a secure manner that ensures that access 

is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 

 (d) Legal Advice Based on Protected Material. Nothing in this Protective 

Order shall be construed to prevent counsel from advising their clients with respect to this case 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 5 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-6-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

based in whole or in part upon Protected Materials, provided counsel does not disclose the 

Protected Material itself except as provided in this Order. 

 (e) Limitations. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any way a Producing 

Party’s use or disclosure of its own Protected Material. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any 

way the use or disclosure of Discovery Material by a Receiving Party: (i) that is or has become 

publicly known through no fault of the Receiving Party; (ii) that is lawfully acquired by or known 

to the Receiving Party independent of the Producing Party; (iii) previously produced, disclosed 

and/or provided by the Producing Party to the Receiving Party or a non-party without an 

obligation of confidentiality and not by inadvertence or mistake; (iv) with the consent of the 

Producing Party; or (v) pursuant to order of the Court. 

7. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 

 (a) Available Designations. Any Producing Party may designate Discovery 

Material with any of the following designations, provided that it meets the requirements for such 

designations as provided for herein: “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE.” 

 (b) Written Discovery and Documents and Tangible Things. Written 

discovery, documents (which include “electronically stored information,” as that phrase is used in 

Federal Rule of Procedure 34), and tangible things that meet the requirements for the 

confidentiality designations listed in Paragraph 7(a) may be so designated by placing the 

appropriate designation on every page of the written material prior to production. For digital files 

being produced, the Producing Party may mark each viewable page or image with the appropriate 

designation, and mark the medium, container, and/or communication in which the digital files 

were contained. In the event that original documents are produced for inspection, the original 

documents shall be presumed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 

during the inspection and re-designated, as appropriate during the copying process. 

 (c) Native Files. Where electronic files and documents are produced in native 

electronic format, such electronic files and documents shall be designated for protection under 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 6 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-7-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

this Order by appending to the file names or designators information indicating whether the file 

contains “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY -– SOURCE CODE,” 

material, or shall use any other reasonable method for so designating Protected Materials 

produced in electronic format. When electronic files or documents are printed for use at 

deposition, in a court proceeding, or for provision in printed form to an expert or consultant preapproved pursuant to paragraph 12(a), the party printing the electronic files or documents shall 

affix a legend to the printed document corresponding to the designation of the Designating Party 

and including the production number and designation associated with the native file. No one 

shall seek to use at trial a .tiff, .pdf, or other image format version of a document produced in 

native file format without first (1) providing a copy of the image format version to the Producing 

Party so that the Producing Party can review the image to ensure that no information has been 

altered and assert any objections to its use. A Party reserves the right to object to a native file 

used in this litigation that has been converted to a .tiff, .pdf or other image format should it later 

be determined that information on the image has been altered. 

 (d) Depositions and Testimony. Parties or testifying persons or entities may 

designate depositions and other testimony with the appropriate designation by indicating on the 

record at the time the testimony is given or by sending written notice of how portions of the 

transcript of the testimony is designated within thirty (30) days of receipt of the transcript of the 

testimony. If no indication on the record is made, all information disclosed during a deposition 

shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” until the time 

within which it may be appropriately designated as provided for herein has passed. Any Party 

that wishes to disclose the transcript, or information contained therein, may provide written notice 

of its intent to treat the transcript as non-confidential, after which time, any Party that wants to 

maintain any portion of the transcript as confidential must designate the confidential portions 

within fourteen (14) days, or else the transcript may be treated as non-confidential. Any 

Protected Material that is used in the taking of a deposition shall remain subject to the provisions 

of this Protective Order, along with the transcript pages of the deposition testimony dealing with 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 7 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-8-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

such Protected Material. In such cases the court reporter shall be informed of this Protective 

Order and shall be required to operate in a manner consistent with this Protective Order. In the 

event the deposition is videotaped, the original and all copies of the videotape shall be marked by 

the video technician to indicate that the contents of the videotape are subject to this Protective 

Order, substantially along the lines of “This videotape contains confidential testimony used in this 

case and is not to be viewed or the contents thereof to be displayed or revealed except pursuant to 

the terms of the operative Protective Order in this matter or pursuant to written stipulation of the 

parties.” Counsel for any Producing Party shall have the right to exclude from oral depositions, 

other than the deponent, deponent’s counsel, the reporter and videographer (if any), any person 

who is not authorized by this Protective Order to receive or access Protected Material based on 

the designation of such Protected Material. Such right of exclusion shall be applicable only 

during periods of examination or testimony regarding such Protected Material. 

 (e) Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 

Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must 

take care to limit any such designation to material that qualifies under the appropriate standards 

so that material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are 

not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized 

designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have 

been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case 

development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the 

Designating Party to such relief as the Court may impose. If it comes to a Designating Party’s 

attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at 

all or do not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that Designating Party must 

promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 

8. DISCOVERY MATERIAL DESIGNATED AS “CONFIDENTIAL” 

 (a) A Producing Party may designate Discovery Material as 

“CONFIDENTIAL” if it contains or reflects confidential, proprietary, and/or commercially 

sensitive information. 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 8 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-9-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

 (b) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Discovery Material designated as 

“CONFIDENTIAL” may be disclosed only to the following: 

(i) The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, such counsel’s immediate 

paralegals and staff, and any copying or clerical litigation support services working at the 

direction of such counsel, paralegals, and staff; 

(ii) Not more than three (3) representatives of the Receiving Party who 

are officers or employees of the Receiving Party, who may be, but need not be, in-house counsel 

for the Receiving Party, as well as their immediate paralegals and staff, to whom disclosure is 

reasonably necessary for this case, provided that: (a) each such person has agreed to be bound 

by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; and (b) no 

unresolved objections to such disclosure exist after proper notice has been given to all Parties 

as set forth in Paragraph 12 below; 

(iii) Any outside expert or consultant retained by the Receiving Party to 

assist in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent necessary to perform such 

work; and provided that: (a) such expert or consultant has agreed to be bound by the provisions 

of the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; (b) such expert or consultant is not a 

current officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, nor anticipated at 

the time of retention to become an officer, director or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a 

Party; (c) such expert or consultant accesses the materials in the United States only, and does not 

transport them to or access them from any foreign jurisdiction; and (d) no unresolved objections 

to such disclosure exist after proper notice has been given to all Parties as set forth in Paragraph 

12 below; 

(iv) Court reporters, stenographers and videographers retained to record 

testimony taken in this action; 

(v) The Court, jury, and court personnel; 

(vi) Graphics, translation, design, and/or trial consulting personnel, 

having first agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of 

Exhibit A; 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 9 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-10-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

(vii) Mock jurors who have signed an undertaking or agreement agreeing 

not to publicly disclose Protected Material and to keep any information concerning Protected 

Material confidential; 

(viii) Any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her 

staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this 

Protective Order; and 

(ix) Any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing 

Party. 

9. DISCOVERY MATERIAL DESIGNATED AS “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 

– ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 

 (a) A Producing Party may designate Discovery Material as “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL –ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” if it contains or reflects information that is 

extremely confidential and/or sensitive in nature and the Producing Party reasonably believes that 

the disclosure of such Discovery Material is likely to cause economic harm or significant 

competitive disadvantage to the Producing Party. The Parties agree that the following 

information, if non-public, shall be presumed to merit the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” designation: trade secrets, pricing information, financial data, 

sales information, sales or marketing forecasts or plans, business plans, sales or marketing 

strategy, product development information, engineering documents, testing documents, employee 

information, and other non-public information of similar competitive and business sensitivity. 

 (b) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Discovery Material designated as 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” may be disclosed only to: 

 (i) The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, provided that such Outside 

Counsel is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S. Steel v. United States, 

730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a competitor of a Party, and 

such Outside Counsel’s immediate paralegals and staff, and any copying or clerical litigation 

support services working at the direction of such counsel, paralegals, and staff; 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 10 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-11-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

 (ii) Any outside expert or consultant retained by the Receiving Party to 

assist in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent necessary to perform such work; 

and provided that: (a) such expert or consultant has agreed to be bound by the provisions of the 

Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; (b) such expert or consultant is not a current 

officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, nor anticipated at the time 

of retention to become an officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party; 

(c) such expert or consultant is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S. 

Steel v. United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a 

competitor of a Party; (d) such expert or consultant accesses the materials in the United States 

only, and does not transport them to or access them from any foreign jurisdiction and (e) no 

unresolved objections to such disclosure exist after proper notice has been given to all Parties as 

set forth in Paragraph 12 below; 

 (iii) Court reporters, stenographers and videographers retained to record 

testimony taken in this action; 

 (iv) The Court, jury, and court personnel; 

 (v) Graphics, translation, design, and/or trial consulting personnel, 

having first agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of 

Exhibit A; 

 (vi) Any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her 

staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this 

Protective Order; and 

 (vii) Any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing 

Party. 

10. DISCOVERY MATERIAL DESIGNATED AS “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 

– OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE” 

 (a) To the extent production of Source Code becomes necessary to the 

prosecution or defense of the case, a Producing Party may designate Source Code as “HIGHLY 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 11 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-12-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE” if it comprises 

or includes confidential, proprietary, and/or trade secret Source Code. 

 (b) Nothing in this Order shall be construed as a representation or admission 

that Source Code is, or is not, properly discoverable in this action, or to obligate any Party to 

produce any Source Code. 

 (c) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Discovery Material designated as 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE” 

shall be subject to the provisions set forth in Paragraph 11 below, and may be disclosed, subject 

to Paragraph 11 below, solely to: 

 (i) The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, provided that such Outside 

Counsel is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S. Steel v. United States, 

730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a competitor of a Party, and 

such Outside Counsel’s immediate paralegals and staff, and any copying or clerical litigation 

support services working at the direction of such counsel, paralegals, and staff; 

 (ii) Any outside expert or consultant retained by the Receiving Party to 

assist in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent necessary to perform such work; 

and provided that: (a) such expert or consultant has agreed to be bound by the provisions of the 

Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; (b) such expert or consultant is not a current 

officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, nor anticipated at the time 

of retention to become an officer, director or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party; 

(c) such expert or consultant is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S. 

Steel v. United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a 

competitor of a Party; (d) such expert or consultant accesses the materials in the United States 

only, and does not transport them to or access them from any foreign jurisdiction; and (e) no 

unresolved objections to such disclosure exist after proper notice has been given to all Parties as 

set forth in Paragraph 12 below; 

 (iii) Court reporters, stenographers and videographers retained to record 

testimony taken in this action; 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 12 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-13-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

 (iv) The Court, jury, and court personnel; 

 (v) Any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her 

staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this 

Protective Order; and 

 (vi) Any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing 

Party. 

11. DISCLOSURE AND REVIEW OF SOURCE CODE 

 (a) Any Source Code that is produced by Apple Inc. will be made available for 

inspection at the Silicon Valley office of its outside counsel, DLA Piper LLP (US) at 2000 

University Avenue, East Palo Alto, California. Source Code will be made available for 

inspection between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. on business days (i.e., weekdays that are not 

Federal holidays), although the Parties will be reasonable in accommodating reasonable requests 

to conduct inspections at other times. 

 (b) Prior to the first inspection of any requested Source Code, the Receiving 

Party shall provide fourteen (14) days notice of the Source Code that it wishes to inspect. The 

Receiving Party shall provide forty-eight (48) business hours notice prior to any additional 

inspections; however, the parties shall make reasonable efforts to accommodate requests on 

shorter notice (e.g. when a reviewer onsite wishes to extend his review to the next business day). 

This section does not change or modify any required disclosures or deadlines pursuant to the 

Patent Local Rules of the Northern District of California. 

 (c) Source Code that is designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE” shall be produced for inspection and review 

subject to the following provisions, unless otherwise agreed by the Producing Party: 

 (i) All Source Code shall be made available by the Producing Party to 

the Receiving Party’s outside counsel and/or experts in a secure room on a secured computer 

without Internet access or network access to other computers and on which all access ports have 

been disabled (except for one printer port), as necessary and appropriate to prevent and protect 

against any unauthorized copying, transmission, removal or other transfer of any Source Code 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 13 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-14-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

outside or away from the computer on which the Source Code is provided for inspection (the 

“Source Code Computer” in the “Source Code Review Room”). 

 The Producing Party shall install the following released versions of the following tools for 

the review of Source Code: SlickEdit, Understand, Beyond Compare, Acrobat, Xcode and 

TextWrangler. The Receiving Party must provide the Producing Party with a CD or DVD 

containing such licensed software tools at least seven (7) business days in advance of the date 

upon which the Receiving Party wishes to have these source code tools for use on the Source 

Code Computer. If the Producing Party is unable to comply with the request within seven (7) 

business days, the Producing Party shall promptly notify the Receiving Party and provide a date 

certain as to when the source code tools will be installed on the Source Code Computer. 

 Additionally, if any documents are produced on the Source Code Computer, appropriate 

software to review the documents shall also be installed. This list of Source Code tools is not 

intended to be limiting, and the Reviewing Party may request that additional tools are installed on 

the Source Code Computer, provided, however, that (a) the Receiving Party possess an 

appropriate license to such software tools; (b) the Producing Party approves such software tools; 

and (c) such other software tools are reasonably necessary for the Receiving Party to perform its 

review of the Source Code consistent with all of the protections herein. Licensed copies of 

mutually agreed upon software tools shall be installed on the Source Code Computer by the 

Producing Party within seven (7) business days after a request is agreed to, with the same process 

described above should the Producing Party be unable to install the requested software tools 

within the seven (7) business days. The Producing Party shall provide the Receiving Party with 

information explaining how to start, log on to, operate, and print from the Source Code 

Computers. 

 (ii) Except as provided in subparagraph (iii) below, no recordable 

media or recordable devices, including without limitation sound recorders, cellular telephones, 

peripheral equipment, cameras, CDs, DVDs, or drives of any kind, shall be permitted into the 

Source Code Review Room. The Producing Party shall provide a room within reasonable 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 14 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-15-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

proximity to the Source Code Review Room where the Reviewing Party may keep and use such 

devices outside the presence of the Producing Party. 

 (iii) The Receiving Party’s outside counsel and/or experts shall be 

entitled to take notes relating to the Source Code, but may not copy the Source Code into the 

notes and may not take such notes electronically on the Source Code Computer itself or any other 

computer. In addition to the Source Code Computer, the Producing Party shall make available 

within the Source Code Review Room a laptop computer with no network connection or camera 

functionality (the “Notetaking Computer”) for purposes of enabling the Receiving Party’s outside 

counsel and/or experts to take notes relating to the Source Code. The Notetaking Computer shall 

have pre-installed a commercially reasonable text editing program, Microsoft Excel or OpenOffice 

Calc spreadsheet software, and an encryption program, such as TrueCrypt. The Receiving Party’s 

outside counsel and/or experts may use the computer for the purposes of taking notes relating to 

the Source Code, but may not copy more than five continuous lines of the Source Code verbatim 

into the notes without consent of the Producing Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably 

withheld. The Reviewing Party shall, upon completion of its review, store its notes within an 

encrypted volume, such as a TrueCrypt volume, protected by at least a 20-character password. 

Upon completion of each review session, the Producing Party shall, upon request by the Receiving 

Party, provide the Receiving Party with an electronic storage medium, such as a USB storage 

device, containing the encrypted volume file with the notes taken by the Receiving Party. At the 

start of each review session, the Producing Party also shall, upon request by the Receiving Party, 

copy an updated encrypted volume file containing any revised notes taken by the Receiving Party, 

from such electronic storage medium onto the Notetaking Computer, for further editing. The 

Receiving Party shall maintain any notes removed from the Source Code Review Room in the 

encrypted form described above at all times when storing or transmitting them. The Producing 

Party shall not monitor or review any notes taken on the Notetaking Computer, shall not receive 

the encryption password, and shall not interact with any note files on the computer in any way 

except to transfer the encrypted volume files, without reviewing their contents, to and from a USB 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 15 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-16-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

storage medium as described above. The use of such computer shall not be asserted to be a waiver 

of any privilege or protection. 

 (iv) The Producing Party may visually monitor the activities of the 

Receiving Party's representatives during any Source Code Computer review, but only to ensure 

that no unauthorized records of the Source Code are being created or transmitted in any way. 

 (v) No copies of all or any portion of the Source Code may leave the 

room in which the Source Code Computer is inspected except as otherwise provided herein. 

Further, no other written or electronic record of the Source Code is permitted except as otherwise 

provided herein. The Producing Party shall make available a laser printer with commercially 

reasonable printing speeds for on-site printing during inspection of the Source Code Computer. 

The Receiving Party may print limited portions of the Source Code only to the extent that such 

portions are relevant to the claims and/or defenses in the above-captioned litigation, or are 

logically related to such relevant portions of the Source Code and shall print no more than a 

reasonable amount of Source Code. The Receiving Party shall not print Source Code in order to 

review blocks of Source Code elsewhere in the first instance, i.e., as an alternative to reviewing 

that Source Code electronically on the Source Code Computer. The Receiving Party shall not, 

without the consent of the Producing Party, print any portion that consists of more than twenty 

(20) consecutive pages of a continuous block (that is, a single file) of Source Code and the 

Producing Party need not provide the printouts of such blocks to the Receiving Party. Upon 

printing any portions of Source Code, the printed pages shall be collected by the Producing Party. 

The Producing Party shall Bates number, copy, and label “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - 

OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY -– SOURCE CODE” any pages printed by the Receiving 

Party. If practicable, within forty-eight (48) business hours, but no later than seventy-two (72) 

business hours, the Producing Party shall either (i) provide one copy set of such pages to the 

Receiving Party or (ii) inform the Requesting Party that it objects that the printed portions are 

excessive and/or not done for a permitted purpose. If, after meeting and conferring, the Producing 

Party and the Receiving Party cannot resolve the objection, either Party shall be entitled to seek a 

Court resolution of whether the printed Source Code in question was printed for a permitted 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 16 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-17-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

purpose. The burden shall be on the Receiving Party to show that any code printed in excess of the 

limitations of this paragraph was printed for a permitted purpose. The printed pages shall 

constitute part of the Source Code produced by the Producing Party in this action. A Receiving 

Party may in good faith request for these limits to be increased. The Receiving Party may seek 

leave of Court to increase these limits if the Receiving Party believes the Producing Party has 

unreasonably withheld consent. 

 (vi) A list of names of persons who will view the Source Code 

Computer will be provided to the Producing Party in conjunction with any written (including 

email) notice prior to inspection. Such identification shall be in addition to any other disclosure 

required under this Order. The Receiving Party shall maintain a daily log of the names of persons 

who enter the locked room to view the Source Code Computer. The Producing Party shall be 

entitled to a copy of the log upon one (1) day's advance notice to the Receiving Party. 

 (vii) Unless otherwise agreed in advance by the Parties in writing, 

following each day on which Source Code Computer inspection is done under this Order, the 

Receiving Party's outside counsel and/or experts shall remove all notes, documents, and all other 

materials from the Source Code Review Room. The Producing Party shall not be responsible for 

any items left in the room following each inspection session. Proper identification of all 

authorized persons shall be provided prior to any access to the secure room or the computer 

containing Source Code. Proper identification requires showing a photo identification card 

sanctioned by the government of any State of the United States, by the government of the United 

States, or by the nation state of the authorized person’s current citizenship. Access to the secure 

room or the Source Code Computer may be denied to any individual who fails to provide proper 

identification. 

 (viii) Other than as provided above, the Receiving Party will not 

copy, remove, or otherwise transfer any Source Code from the Source Code Computer including, 

without limitation, copying, removing, or transferring the Source Code onto any recordable media 

or recordable device. Other than as provided above, the Receiving Party will not transmit any 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 17 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-18-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

Source Code in any way from the Producing Party's facilities or the offices of its outside counsel 

of record. 

 (ix) The Receiving Party's outside counsel of record may make 

no more than five (5) additional paper copies of any portions of the Source Code received from a 

Producing Party pursuant to Paragraph 11(c)(v), not including copies attached to court filings or 

used at depositions, and shall maintain a log of all paper copies of the Source Code. The log shall 

include the names of the reviewers and/or recipients of paper copies and the locations where said 

paper copies are stored. Upon one (1) day's advance notice to the Receiving Party by the 

Producing Party, the Receiving Party shall provide a copy of this log to the Producing Party. 

 (x) The Receiving Party's outside counsel of record and any 

person receiving a copy of any Source Code shall maintain and store any paper copies of the 

Source Code at their offices in a manner that prevents duplication of or unauthorized access to the 

Source Code, including, without limitation, storing the Source Code in a locked room or cabinet at 

all times when it is not in use. No more than a total of twenty-five (25) individuals identified by 

the Receiving Party shall have access to the printed portions of Apple Source Code (except insofar 

as such code appears in any court filing or expert report). If a Receiving Party requires more than 

twenty-five (25) individuals to have access to the printed portions of Apple Source Code, the 

parties shall meet and confer in good faith. 

 (xi) For depositions, the Receiving party shall not bring copies of 

any printed Source Code. Rather, at least three (3) business days before the date of the deposition, 

the Receiving Party shall notify the Producing Party which portions of Source Code (by 

production number) it wishes to use at the deposition, and the Producing Party shall bring printed 

copies of those portions to the deposition for use by the Receiving Party. Copies of Source Code 

that are marked as deposition exhibits shall not be provided to the Court Reporter or attached to 

deposition transcripts; rather, the deposition record will identify the exhibit by its production 

numbers. All paper copies of Source Code brought to the deposition shall remain with the 

Producing Counsel’s outside counsel for secure destruction in a timely manner following the 

deposition. Additionally, at least five (5) days before the date of the deposition, the Receiving 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 18 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-19-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

Party may request to the Producing Party that the Source Code Computer be made available at the 

deposition. The Parties shall meet and confer in good faith regarding any such requests and the 

Receiving Party must identify the need for the Source Code Computer at the deposition. To the 

extent the Source Code Computer is used at a deposition, portions of the Source Code discussed 

will be identified on the record and reasonable portions of the source code can be printed and 

marked as exhibits. The Producing Party shall retain possession of any source code printed at the 

deposition, including any source code printed and marked as an exhibit. After the deposition, the 

Producing Party shall provide the Receiving Party a copy of any source code printed at the 

deposition within forty-eight (48) business hours, if practicable, but no later than seventy-two (72) 

business hours, of the conclusion of the deposition. The Source Code Computer shall not be 

marked as an exhibit. Any deposition requiring the use of the Source Code Computer shall take 

place at the office of DLA Piper in Silicon Valley. 

(xii) Except as provided in this sub-paragraph, absent express 

written permission from the Producing Party, the Receiving Party may not create electronic 

images, or any other images, or make electronic copies, of the Source Code from any paper copy 

of Source Code for use in any manner (including by way of example only, the Receiving Party 

may not scan the Source Code to a PDF or photograph the code). Images or copies of Source 

Code shall not be included in correspondence between the Parties (references to production 

numbers shall be used instead), and shall be omitted from pleadings and other papers whenever 

possible. If a Party reasonably believes that it needs to submit a portion of Source Code as part of 

a filing with the Court, the Parties shall meet and confer as to how to make such a filing while 

protecting the confidentiality of the Source Code and such Source Code will not be filed absent 

agreement from the Producing Party that the confidentiality protections will be adequate, which 

agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld. If a Producing Party agrees to produce an 

electronic copy of all or any portion of its Source Code or provide written permission to the 

Receiving Party that an electronic or any other copy needs to be made for a Court filing, access to 

the Receiving Party’s submission, communication, and/or disclosure of electronic files or other 

materials containing any portion of Source Code (paper or electronic) shall at all times be limited 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 19 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-20-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

solely to individuals who are expressly authorized to view Source Code under the provisions of 

this Order. Where the Producing Party has provided the express written permission required under 

this provision for a Receiving Party to create electronic copies of Source Code, the Receiving 

Party shall maintain a log of all such electronic copies of any portion of Source Code in its 

possession or in the possession of its retained consultants, including the names of the reviewers 

and/or recipients of any such electronic copies, and the locations and manner in which the 

electronic copies are stored. Additionally, any such electronic copies must be labeled 

“CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE” as provided for in this 

Order. This provision shall not prohibit the use of Source Code in expert reports. 

12. NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE 

 (a) Prior to disclosing any Protected Material to any person described in 

Paragraphs 8(b)(ii), 8(b)(iii), 9(b)(ii), or 10(c)(ii) (referenced below as “Person”), the Party seeking 

to disclose such information shall provide the Producing Party with written notice that includes: (i) 

the name of the Person; (ii) the present employer and title of the Person; (iii) an identification of all 

of the Person’s past and current employment and consulting relationships, including direct 

relationships and relationships through entities owned or controlled by the Person, including but 

not limited to an identification of any individual or entity with or for whom the person is employed 

or to whom the person provides consulting services relating to the design development, operation, 

or patenting of the implementing a flash translation layer, wear leveling, fast startup routines or 

data scrubbing in a flash memory system, or relating to the acquisition of intellectual property 

assets relating to the implementing a flash translation layer, wear leveling, fast startup routines or 

data scrubbing in a flash memory system for the past five (5) years, except to the extent that the 

Person is prohibited from disclosing such relationships by contract; (iv) an up-to-date curriculum 

vitae of the Person; (v) an identification of all pending patent applications on which the Person is 

named as an inventor, in which the Person has any ownership interest, or as to which the Person 

has had an involvement in advising on, consulting on, preparing, prosecuting, drafting, editing, 

amending, or otherwise affecting the scope of claims relating to implementing a flash translation 

layer, wear leveling, fast startup routines or data scrubbing in a flash memory system, and (vi) a 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 20 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-21-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

list of the cases in which the Person has testified at deposition or trial within the last five (5) years. 

The Party seeking to disclose Protected Material shall provide such other information regarding 

the Person’s professional activities reasonably requested by the Producing Party for it to evaluate 

whether good cause exists to object to the disclosure of Protected Material to the outside expert or 

consultant. During the pendency of this action, including all appeals, the Party seeking to disclose 

Protected Material shall promptly provide written notice of any change with respect to the Person’s 

involvement in the design, development, operation or patenting of the implementing a flash 

translation layer, wear leveling, fast startup routines or data scrubbing in a flash memory system or 

the acquisition of intellectual property assets relating to implementing a flash translation layer, 

wear leveling, fast startup routines or data scrubbing in a flash memory system. 

 (b) Within fourteen calendar (14) days of receipt of the disclosure of the 

Person, the Producing Party or Parties may object in writing to the Person for good cause. In the 

absence of an objection at the end of the fourteen calendar (14) day period, the Person shall be 

deemed approved under this Protective Order. There shall be no disclosure of Protected Material 

to the Person prior to expiration of this fourteen calendar (14) day period. If the Producing Party 

objects to disclosure to the Person within such fourteen calendar (14) day period, the Parties shall 

meet and confer via telephone or in person within seven (7) days following the objection and 

attempt in good faith to resolve the dispute on an informal basis. If the dispute is not resolved, the 

Party objecting to the disclosure will have seven (7) days from the date of the meet and confer to 

seek relief from the Court. If relief is not sought from the Court within that time, the objection 

shall be deemed withdrawn. If relief is sought, designated materials shall not be disclosed to the 

Person in question until the Court resolves the objection. 

 (c) For purposes of this section, "good cause" shall include an objectively 

reasonable concern that the Person will, advertently or inadvertently, use or disclose Discovery 

Materials in a way or ways that are inconsistent with the provisions contained in this Order. 

 (d) Prior to receiving any Protected Material under this Order, the Person must 

execute a copy of the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A hereto) and serve 

it on all Parties. 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 21 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-22-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

 (e) An initial failure to object to a Person under this Paragraph 12 shall not 

preclude the nonobjecting Party from later objecting to continued access by that Person for good 

cause and to the extent new information comes to light that was not ascertainable earlier. If an 

objection is made, the Parties shall meet and confer via telephone or in person within seven (7) 

days following the objection and attempt in good faith to resolve the dispute informally. If the 

dispute is not resolved, the Party objecting to the disclosure will have seven (7) days from the date 

of the meet and confer to seek relief from the Court. The designated Person may continue to have 

access to information that was provided to such Person prior to the date of the objection. If a later 

objection is made, no further Protected Material shall be disclosed to the Person until the Court 

resolves the matter or the Producing Party withdraws its objection. Notwithstanding the foregoing, 

if the Producing Party fails to move for a protective order within seven (7) business days after the 

meet and confer, further Protected Material may thereafter be provided to the Person. 

13. CHALLENGING DESIGNATIONS OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 

 (a) A Party shall not be obligated to challenge the propriety of any designation 

of Discovery Material under this Order at the time the designation is made, and a failure to do so 

shall not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. 

 (b) Any challenge to a designation of Discovery Material under this Order shall 

be written, shall be served on outside counsel for the Producing Party, shall particularly identify 

the documents or information that the Receiving Party contends should be differently designated, 

and shall state the grounds for the objection. Thereafter, further protection of such material shall 

be resolved in accordance with the following procedures: 

 (c) The objecting Party shall have the burden of conferring either in person, in 

writing, or by telephone with the Producing Party claiming protection (as well as any other 

interested party) in a good faith effort to resolve the dispute. The Producing Party shall have the 

burden of justifying the disputed designation; 

 (d) Failing agreement, the Receiving Party may bring a motion to the Court for 

a ruling that the Discovery Material in question is not entitled to the status and protection of the 

Producing Party's designation. The Parties' entry into this Order shall not preclude or prejudice 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 22 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-23-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

either Party from arguing for or against any designation, establish any presumption that a 

particular designation is valid, or alter the burden of proof that would otherwise apply in a dispute 

over discovery or disclosure of information; 

 (e) Notwithstanding any challenge to a designation, the Discovery Material in 

question shall continue to be treated as designated under this Order until one of the following 

occurs: (a) the Party who designated the Discovery Material in question withdraws such 

designation in writing; or (b) the Court rules that the Discovery Material in question is not entitled 

to the designation. 

14. SUBPOENAS OR COURT ORDERS 

If at any time Protected Material is subpoenaed by any court, arbitral, administrative, or 

legislative body, the Party to whom the subpoena or other request is directed shall immediately 

give prompt written notice thereof to every Party who has produced such Discovery Material and 

to its counsel and shall provide each such Party with an opportunity to move for a protective order 

regarding the production of Protected Materials implicated by the subpoena. 

15. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL 

 (a) Absent written permission from the Producing Party or a court Order 

secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Receiving Party may not file or disclose 

in the public record any Protected Material. 

 (b) Any Party is authorized under Civil L.R. 79-5 to file under seal with the 

Court any brief, document or materials that are designated as Protected Material under this Order. 

 (c) However, nothing in this section shall in any way limit or detract from this 

Order's requirements as to Source Code. 

16. INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED MATERIAL 

 (a) The inadvertent production by a Party of Discovery Material subject to the 

attorney-client privilege, work-product protection, or any other applicable privilege or protection, 

despite the Producing Party’s reasonable efforts to prescreen such Discovery Material prior to 

production, will not waive the applicable privilege and/or protection if a request for return of such 

inadvertently produced Discovery Material is made promptly after the Producing Party learns of its 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 23 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-24-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

inadvertent production. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), this Order 

constitutes a court order as contemplated under Rule 502(d), which provides that “the privilege or 

protection is not waived by disclosure connected with the litigation pending before the court—in 

which event the disclosure is also not a waiver in any other federal or state proceeding.” 

 (b) Upon a request from any Producing Party who has inadvertently produced 

Discovery Material that it believes is privileged and/or protected, each Receiving Party shall 

immediately return such Protected Material or Discovery Material and all copies to the Producing 

Party, except for any pages containing privileged markings by the Receiving Party which shall 

instead be destroyed and certified as such by the Receiving Party to the Producing Party. 

 (d) Nothing herein shall prevent the Receiving Party from preparing a record 

for its own use containing the date, author, addresses, and topic of the inadvertently produced 

Discovery Material and such other information as is reasonably necessary to identify the 

Discovery Material and describe its nature to the Court in any motion to compel production of the 

Discovery Material. 

17. INADVERTENT FAILURE TO DESIGNATE PROPERLY 

 (a) The inadvertent failure by a Producing Party to designate Discovery 

Material as Protected Material with one of the designations provided for under this Order shall not 

waive any such designation provided that the Producing Party notifies all Receiving Parties that 

such Discovery Material is protected under one of the categories of this Order within fourteen (14) 

days of the Producing Party learning of the inadvertent failure to designate. The Producing Party 

shall reproduce the Protected Material with the correct confidentiality designation within seven (7) 

days upon its notification to the Receiving Parties. Upon receiving the Protected Material with the 

correct confidentiality designation, the Receiving Parties shall return or securely destroy, at the 

Producing Party’s option, all Discovery Material that was not designated properly. 

 (b) A Receiving Party shall not be in breach of this Order for any use of such 

Discovery Material before the Receiving Party receives such notice that such Discovery Material 

is protected under one of the categories of this Order, unless an objectively reasonable person 

would have realized that the Discovery Material should have been appropriately designated with a 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 24 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-25-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

confidentiality designation under this Order. Once a Receiving Party has received notification of 

the correct confidentiality designation for the Protected Material with the correct confidentiality 

designation, the Receiving Party shall treat such Discovery Material (subject to the exception in 

Paragraph 17(c) below) at the appropriately designated level pursuant to the terms of this Order. 

 (c) Notwithstanding the above, a subsequent designation of 

“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” 

shall apply on a going forward basis and shall not disqualify anyone who reviewed 

“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or 

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” 

materials while the materials were not marked “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – 

SOURCE CODE” from engaging in the activities set forth in Paragraph 6(b). 

18. INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE NOT AUTHORIZED BY ORDER 

 (a) In the event of a disclosure of any Discovery Material pursuant to this 

Order to any person or persons not authorized to receive such disclosure under this Protective 

Order, the Party responsible for having made such disclosure, and each Party with knowledge 

thereof, shall immediately notify counsel for the Producing Party whose Discovery Material has 

been disclosed and provide to such counsel all known relevant information concerning the nature 

and circumstances of the disclosure. The responsible disclosing Party shall also promptly take all 

reasonable measures to retrieve the improperly disclosed Discovery Material and to ensure that no 

further or greater unauthorized disclosure and/or use thereof is made 

 (b) Unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure does not change the status of 

Discovery Material or waive the right to hold the disclosed document or information as Protected. 

19. FINAL DISPOSITION 

 (a) Not later than ninety (90) days after the Final Disposition of this case, each 

Party shall return all Discovery Material of a Producing Party to the respective outside counsel of 

the Producing Party or destroy such Material, at the option of the Producing Party. For purposes 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 25 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-26-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

of this Order, “Final Disposition” occurs after an order, mandate, or dismissal finally terminating 

the above-captioned action with prejudice, including all appeals. 

 (b) All Parties that have received any such Discovery Material shall certify in 

writing that all such materials have been returned to the respective outside counsel of the 

Producing Party or destroyed. Notwithstanding the provisions for return of Discovery Material, 

outside counsel may retain one set of pleadings, correspondence and attorney and consultant work 

product (but not document productions) for archival purposes, but must return any pleadings, 

correspondence, and consultant work product that contain Source Code. 

20. DISCOVERY FROM EXPERTS OR CONSULTANTS 

 (a) Drafts of reports of testifying experts, and reports and other written 

materials, including drafts, of consulting experts, shall not be discoverable. 

(b) Reports and materials exempt from discovery under the foregoing 

Paragraph shall be treated as attorney work product for the purposes of this case and Protective 

Order. 

(c) Testifying experts shall not be subject to discovery with respect to any 

draft of his or her report(s) in this case. Draft reports, notes, or outlines for draft reports 

developed and drafted by the testifying expert and/or his or her staff are also exempt from 

discovery. 

(d) Discovery of materials provided to testifying experts shall be limited to 

those materials, facts, consulting expert opinions, and other matters actually relied upon by the 

testifying expert in forming his or her final report, trial, or deposition testimony or any opinion in 

this case. No discovery can be taken from any non-testifying expert except to the extent that such 

non-testifying expert has provided information, opinions, or other materials to a testifying expert 

relied upon by that testifying expert in forming his or her final report(s), trial, and/or deposition 

testimony or any opinion in this case. 

(e) No conversations or communications between counsel and any testifying or 

consulting expert will be subject to discovery unless the conversations or communications are 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 26 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-27-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

relied upon by such experts in formulating opinions that are presented in reports or trial or 

deposition testimony in this case. 

(f) Materials, communications, and other information exempt from discovery 

under the foregoing Paragraphs 20(a)–(g) shall be treated as attorney-work product for the 

purposes of this litigation and Order. 

 (g) Nothing in Protective Order, include Paragraphs 20(a)–(g), shall alter or 

change in any way the requirements in Paragraph 11 regarding Source Code, and Paragraph 11 

shall control in the event of any conflict. 

21. MISCELLANEOUS 

 (a) Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 

person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. By stipulating to this Order, the Parties 

do not waive the right to argue that certain material may require additional or different 

confidentiality protections than those set forth herein. 

 (b) Termination of Matter and Retention of Jurisdiction. The Parties agree that 

the terms of this Protective Order shall survive and remain in effect after the Final Determination 

of the above-captioned matter. The Court shall retain jurisdiction after Final Determination of 

this matter to hear and resolve any disputes arising out of this Protective Order. 

 (c) Successors. This Order shall be binding upon the Parties hereto, their 

attorneys, and their successors, executors, personal representatives, administrators, heirs, legal 

representatives, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, employees, agents, retained consultants and 

experts, and any persons or organizations over which they have direct control. 

 (d) Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 

Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or 

producing any information or item. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground 

to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. This Order shall not 

constitute a waiver of the right of any Party to claim in this action or otherwise that any 

Discovery Material, or any portion thereof, is privileged or otherwise non-discoverable, or is not 

admissible in evidence in this action or any other proceeding. 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 27 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-28-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

 (e) Burdens of Proof. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary above, 

nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed to change the burdens of proof or legal 

standards applicable in disputes regarding whether particular Discovery Material is confidential, 

which level of confidentiality is appropriate, whether disclosure should be restricted, and if so, 

what restrictions should apply. 

 (f) Modification by Court. This Order is subject to further court order based 

upon public policy or other considerations, and the Court may modify this Order sua sponte in the 

interests of justice. The United States District Court for Northern District of California is 

responsible for the interpretation and enforcement of this Order. All disputes concerning 

Protected Material, however designated, produced under the protection of this Order shall be 

resolved by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 

 (g) Discovery Rules Remain Unchanged. Nothing herein shall alter or change 

in any way the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules for 

the United States District Court for Northern District of California, or the Court’s own orders. 

Identification of any individual pursuant to this Protective Order does not make that individual 

available for deposition or any other form of discovery outside of the restrictions and procedures 

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules for the United States District Court for 

Northern District of California, or the Court’s own orders. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: March 19, 2015 BUNSOW, DE MORY, SMITH & ALLISON LLP

By: /s/ Henry C. Bunsow

HENRY C. BUNSOW 

JOHN D. BEYNON 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

LONGITUDE LICENSING LTD. AND 

LONGITUDE FLASH MEMORY SYSTEMS 

S.A.R.L. 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 28 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-29-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

Dated: March 19, 2015 DLA PIPER LLP (US)

By: /s/ Christine K. Corbett

JOHN ALLCOCK 

SEAN CUNNINGHAM 

CHRISTINE K. CORBETT 

BRENT YAMASHITA 

Attorneys for Defendant 

APPLE INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: ________________ 

 THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

March 23, 2015

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 29 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-30-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B., I hereby attest that I have obtained 

concurrence of the above noted signatories as indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within 

this e-filed document. 

Dated: March 20, 2015 /s/ John D. Beynon John D. Beynon 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 30 of 31
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-31-

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF 

DISCOVERY MATERIALS / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4275 EDL 

EXHIBIT A 

I, , acknowledge and declare that I have received a 

copy of the Protective Order (“Order”) in Longitude Licensing Ltd., et al. v. Apple Inc., 

United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, Civil 

Action No. 3:14-cv-04275 EDL. Having read and understood the terms of the Order, I agree to 

be bound by the terms of the Order and consent to the jurisdiction of said Court for the 

purpose of any proceeding to enforce the terms of the Order. 

Name of individual: 

Present occupation/job description: 

Name of Company or Firm: 

Address: 

Dated: 

 

[Signature] 

Case 3:14-cv-04275-EDL Document 49 Filed 03/23/15 Page 31 of 31