Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-01679/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-01679-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Shari Klein,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

Golfswitch, Inc., et al.,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-14-01679-PHX-PGR 

 ORDER

 

 

In a complaint filed on July 25, 2014, the plaintiff alleged that the Court has

diversity of citizenship jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. In

an order (Doc. 8), entered on July 28, 2014, the Court dismissed the complaint for

lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the existence of diversity jurisdiction was

not evident from the face of the complaint inasmuch as the plaintiff had failed to

properly allege the citizenship of three of the four named parties. The Court

specifically informed the plaintiff in that order what the jurisdictional deficiencies

were, and required the plaintiff to file an amended complaint properly stating a

jurisdictional basis for this action no later than August 15, 2014. The Court further

informed the plaintiff that her failure to timely or sufficiently comply with the order

would result in the dismissal of this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Case 2:14-cv-01679-PGR Document 9 Filed 10/01/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

The Court notes that the notice of electronic filing for its July 28th

order shows that the order was sent to three different email addresses for the

plaintiff’s counsel.

- 2 -

A review of the Court’s docket record establishes that the plaintiff has to date

failed to comply with the Court’s order in any manner, i.e., she has not filed an

amended complaint, she has not sought an extension of time to do so, and she has

not communicated to the Court any inability on her part to comply with the order.1

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction.

DATED this 1st day of October, 2014.

Case 2:14-cv-01679-PGR Document 9 Filed 10/01/14 Page 2 of 2