Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00783/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00783-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEE ALLEN BRANNUM, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

BOARD OF PRISON HEARINGS, )

)

)

Respondent. )

)

 )

1:06-cv-00783 OWW-TAG (HC) 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 10)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 9)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On April 8, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed a Findings and

Recommendations recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as moot. 

(Doc. 10). The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice

that any objections were to be filed within fifteen days from the date of service of that order. To

date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper

analysis. 

Case 1:06-cv-00783-OWW -TAG Document 11 Filed 05/02/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations, filed April 8, 2008 (Doc. 10), is ADOPTED

IN FULL;

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9), is GRANTED;

3. This petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT and close the file. 

This order terminates the action in its entirety. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 1, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00783-OWW -TAG Document 11 Filed 05/02/08 Page 2 of 2