Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01247/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01247-49/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29:206 Collect Unpaid Wages

---

REVISED STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING

MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER - 1

No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800

Seattle, Washington 98101-2272

(206) 749-0500

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

David N. Bruce, Pro Hac Vice

James P. Savitt, Pro Hac Vice

Miles A. Yanick, Pro Hac Vice

Sarah Gohmann Bigelow, Pro Hac Vice

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

1425 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800

Seattle, Washington 98101

Telephone: (206) 749-0500

William C. Hahesy, State Bar No. 105743

LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY

225 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 105

Fresno, CA 93704

Telephone: (559) 579-1230

Facsimile: (559) 579-1231

Attorneys for Defendant DELANO FARMS COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AT FRESNO

SABAS ARREDONDO, JOSE CUEVAS, 

HILARIO GOMEZ, IRMA LANDEROS, and 

ROSALBA LANDEROS individually, and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DELANO FARMS COMPANY, a Washington 

State Corporation; CAL-PACIFIC FARM 

MANAGEMENT, L.P.; T&R BANGI'S 

AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, INC., and 

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

NO. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS

REVISED STIPULATION AND 

ORDER REGARDING

MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING 

ORDER

Having met and conferred, the Parties hereby submit that good cause exists to modify 

the Court’s Scheduling Order (Doc. 412), as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

16(b)(4). Defendants had a plan for timely completion of discovery, but have encountered 

circumstances necessitating a modification of the current scheduling order. 

Case 1:09-cv-01247-MJS Document 424 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 4
REVISED STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING

MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER - 2

No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800

Seattle, Washington 98101-2272

(206) 749-0500

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

On or around March 30, 2016, counsel for California Survey Research Services 

(“CSRS”) informed Delano Farms that they had recently been retained and that the CSRS 

deponents were no longer available for depositions that previously had been scheduled to occur 

on April 11 and 12 (having been continued once, at CSRS’s request, from April 6 and 7). 

Counsel for CSRS requested a continuance of the depositions until the week of April 25 to give 

counsel adequate time to prepare. CSRS counsel also needed time to complete the production

of documents responsive to Delano Farms’ subpoena. CSRS made a supplemental production 

of documents on April 7 and has told Delano Farms' counsel that an additional production will 

be forthcoming on April 11.

The deposition of Plaintiffs’ expert, Dr. Roberts, was scheduled for April 22. Because 

Defendants intend to depose Dr. Roberts after the CSRS deponents, Defendants prefer that his 

deposition be rescheduled for the first or second week of May and Plaintiffs do not object.

According to Plaintiffs’ counsel, Plaintiffs are also working in good faith with 

Bakersfield Market Research (“BMR”) to ensure that a small number of additional documents 

identified during the March 30 depositions of BMR representatives will be promptly produced

to all Defendants.

Good cause existing to modify the Scheduling Order, the Parties hereby stipulate as 

follows:

1. Defendants’ deadline for making expert disclosures and filing their responses to

Plaintiffs’ trial plan is continued from May 16, 2016 to June 6, 2016. If Defendants choose to 

make a counter-proposal, it shall be as part of their response.

2. Plaintiffs’ deadline for filing a reply in support of their proposed trial plan is 

continued from June 6, 2016 to July 5, 2016.

3. The hearing on the trial plan shall be continued from June 30, 2016 to August 

19, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., Fresno Courtroom 6 (MJS).

4. The existing discovery cut-off, May 30, 2016, is hereby stricken. The parties 

Case 1:09-cv-01247-MJS Document 424 Filed 04/26/16 Page 2 of 4
REVISED STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING

MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER - 3

No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800

Seattle, Washington 98101-2272

(206) 749-0500

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

will meet and confer regarding a proposed discovery cut-off and will present this cut-off date to 

the Court at the August 9 hearing on the trial plan.

5. The Trial Scheduling Conference shall be continued from September 15, 2016 to 

October 20, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., Fresno Courtroom 6 (MJS).

SO STIPULATED:

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

By /s/ David N. Bruce (as authorized on

04/19/2016)

 David N. Bruce, Pro Hac Vice

 Miles A. Yanick, Pro Hac Vice

Attorneys for Delano Farms Company

MCCORMICK BARSTOW LLP

By /s/ D. Greg Durbin (as authorized on

04/19/2016) 

 D. Greg Durbin, State Bar No. 81749

 Laura A. Wolfe, State Bar No. 266751

Attorneys for Cal-Pacific Farm Management, 

L.P., and T&R Bangi’s Agricultural Services, Inc. 

LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY

By /s/ William C. Hahesy (as authorized 

on 04/19/2016) 

 William C. Hahesy, State Bar No. 105743

Attorney for Delano Farms Company

MARTINEZ AGUILASOCHO & LYNCH

By /s/ Mario Martinez (as authorized on

04/19/2016) 

 Mario Martinez, State Bar No. 200721

 Thomas Patrick Lynch, State Bar No.159277

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 1:09-cv-01247-MJS Document 424 Filed 04/26/16 Page 3 of 4
REVISED STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING

MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER - 4

No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS

SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP

1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800

Seattle, Washington 98101-2272

(206) 749-0500

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

ORDER

Good cause existing to modify the Scheduling Order, the Court hereby approves and 

adopts as the Order of the Court the stipulation as follows:

1. Defendants’ deadline for making expert disclosures and filing their responses to

Plaintiffs’ trial plan is continued from May 16, 2016 to June 6, 2016. If Defendants 

choose to make a counter-proposal, it shall be as part of their response.

2. Plaintiffs’ deadline for filing a reply in support of their proposed trial plan is continued 

from June 6, 2016 to July 5, 2016.

3. The hearing on the trial plan shall be continued from June 30, 2016 to August 19, 2016, 

at 9:30 a.m., Fresno Courtroom 6 (MJS).

4. The existing discovery cut-off, May 30, 2016, is hereby stricken. The parties will meet 

and confer regarding a proposed discovery cut-off and will present this cut-off date to 

the Court at the August 9 hearing on the trial plan.

5. The Trial Scheduling Conference shall be continued from September 15, 2016 to 

October 20, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., Fresno Courtroom 6 (MJS).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 22, 2016 /s/Michael J. Seng 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-01247-MJS Document 424 Filed 04/26/16 Page 4 of 4