Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00657/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00657-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NASSR MOHAMED, as owner of )

Family Food Market and )

co-owner of Parkview Market, )

et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

v. )

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF )

AGRICULTURE FOOD AND )

NUTRITION, )

)

Defendant. )

)

 )

1:05-CV-00657-SMS

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON

PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AND DEEMING MOTION

SUBMITTED ON THE PAPERS (DOC. 30)

Plaintiffs are proceeding with a civil action in this Court.

Plaintiffs are proceeding with a civil action in this Court. By

order filed November 9, 2005, entered upon the parties’ consent,

Judge Anthony W. Ishii assigned this action to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge for all proceedings, including the entry of

final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P.

73(b), and Local Rule 73-301.

On November 6, 2006, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a motion to

withdraw as attorney for Plaintiff, including a notice or motion

and motion, memorandum of points and authorities, declaration of

Roger K. Vehrs with attachments, and proofs of service. Despite

Case 1:05-cv-00657-SMS Document 33 Filed 12/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the passage of the time for filing opposition or any other

response, neither any party nor Plaintiff has filed opposition or

any form of response.

Pursuant to Rule 78-230(h) of the Local Rules of Practice

for the United States District Court, Eastern District of

California, the Court finds that the motion of Plaintiff’s

counsel Roger K. Vehrs to withdraw as Plaintiff’s attorney is a

matter that may appropriately be submitted upon the record and

briefs.

Accordingly, the hearing on the motion, presently set for

December 15, 2006, IS VACATED, and the motion IS DEEMED SUBMITTED

to the Court for decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 11, 2006 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

icido3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00657-SMS Document 33 Filed 12/11/06 Page 2 of 2