Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06663/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-06663-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

1 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

JOEL S. SANDERS, SBN 107234 

ADAM WILSON, SBN 206107 

One Montgomery Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 393-8200 

Facsimile: (415) 986-5309 

JSanders@gibsondunn.com 

adamwilson@gibsondunn.com 

ARNOLD & PORTER 

RONALD C. REDCAY, SBN 67236 

777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90017-2513 

Telephone: (213) 243-4002 

Facsimile: (213) 243-4199 

Ronald_Redcay@aporter.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. and 

MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC. 

[Additional Counsel and Parties Appear at End] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID TAKEDA, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Civil No. C-06-6663 MEJ 

MDL 1819 (pending) 

JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY 

PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 

DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY 

JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT 

LITIGATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

_____________________________________

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 1 of 15
2 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2(e) of the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California, the following parties hereby stipulate to a stay of the proceeding for 

the following good cause: 

1. At least 55 complaints have been filed to date in federal district courts by plaintiffs 

bringing class actions on behalf of either direct or indirect purchasers alleging price fixing by 

manufacturers of Static Random Access Memory ("SRAM") (collectively, the "SRAM cases"). 

2. There is currently pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") 

(MDL case number 1819) a motion to transfer SRAM cases for coordinated or consolidated pretrial 

proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. 

3. On November 15, 2006, several defendants in the SRAM cases filed with the JPML a 

schedule identifying the above-captioned case as a potential tag-along action to pending MDL 1819. 

4. On December 14, 2006, the JPML issued a Notice of Hearing Session stating that the 

request to consolidate the SRAM cases will be heard by the JPML on January 25, 2007. 

5. The parties agree that, at some point subsequent to that hearing, the JPML is likely to grant 

the transfer and coordination or consolidation request. 

6. In light of the pending consolidation request before the JPML, Plaintiffs and Defendants 

Micron Technology, Inc. and Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc.1 stipulated on December 5, 2006 

(Document 7) to extend the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned 

action to the earlier of the following two dates: (1) thirty days after the filing of a Consolidated 

Amended Complaint in the SRAM cases; or (2) thirty days after Plaintiffs provide written notice that 

they do not intend to file a Consolidated Amended Complaint, provided that such notice may be 

given only at or after the initial case management conference in the MDL transferee court in this 

case. Upon information and belief, all other defendants that have been served in this case joined that 

 

1 Crucial Technology, an unincorporated division of Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., is 

named as a defendant in the above-referenced complaint, while Micron Semiconductor 

Products, Inc. is not. To the extent Crucial Technology is a proper party, it joins this 

Stipulation. 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 2 of 15
3 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

Stipulation, by letter or otherwise, and there have not been any other time modifications in this case 

except as noted in this Paragraph. 

7. Anticipating a decision by the JPML, two courts in this district have already denied a 

series of administrative motions to consider whether certain SRAM cases should be related. These 

courts denied all of these motions without prejudice to renewal following the resolution of the 

proceedings before the JPML. See Dataplex, Inc. v. Alliance Semiconductor Corp., et. al, No. 06-

6491 CW (12/14/06 Order of Judge Wilken); see also In re DRAM Litigation, No. M02-1486 PJH 

(11/15/06 Order of Judge Hamilton). 

8. Also anticipating a decision by the JPML, four courts in this district have recently either 

stayed an SRAM proceeding or continued case management deadlines in six SRAM actions. See 

Dataplex, Inc. v. Alliance Semiconductor Corp., et al., No. 06-6491 CW (12/27/06 Order of Judge 

Wilken to temporarily stay proceeding pending decision by JPML); Stargate Films, Inc. v. Alliance 

Semiconductor Corp., et al., No. 06-7007 CW (12/27/06 Order of Judge Wilken to temporarily stay 

proceeding pending decision by JPML); Maites v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., No. 6-6542 

SBA (12/27/06 Order of Judge Armstrong to continue case management dates pending decision by 

JPML); Reclaim Center, Inc., et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., No. 06-6533 SI (12/22/06 

Order of Judge Illston to stay proceeding pending decision by JPML); Madsen v. Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., No. 06-6541 SI (12/22/06 Order of Judge Illston to continue case 

management deadlines pending decision by JPML); Ma v. Alliance Semiconductor Corp., et al., No. 

06-6511 EDL (12/20/06 Order of Judge Laporte to continue case management deadlines and 

conference pending decision by JPML). 

9. Given the January 25, 2007 hearing date for pending MDL 1819, the dates set forth in the 

Case Management Scheduling Order filed October 26, 2006 in the above-captioned case (Document 

2), including deadlines imposed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26, Local Rule 16, and ADR 

Local Rule 3.5, will come to pass before the JPML likely acts on the pending request. 

10. The parties agree that a temporary stay of this proceeding pending the JPML's resolution 

of the pending transfer and coordination or consolidation request would promote judicial efficiency, 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 3 of 15
4 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

allow consistency in pretrial rulings, and be most convenient to the parties, including the Plaintiffs in 

the above-captioned action. 

11. The parties agree that this joint stipulation does not constitute a waiver of any defense, 

including but not limited to the defense of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction or improper 

venue. 

12. Accordingly, the parties hereby STIPULATE to and respectfully request the Court to 

temporarily STAY the proceeding and VACATE the dates set forth in the Case Management 

Scheduling Order filed October 26, 2006 (Document 2) pending the resolution of the transfer motion 

currently before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in MDL No. 1819. The affected dates 

include the deadline to meet and confer and file Joint ADR Certification (currently January 11, 

2007); the deadline to complete Initial Disclosures, the Joint Case Management Statement, and the 

Rule 26(f) Report (currently January 25, 2007); and the Initial Case Management Conference 

(currently February 1, 2007). 

13. In the alternative, the parties hereby STIPULATE to and respectfully request the Court to 

CONTINUE the dates set forth in the Case Management Scheduling Order filed October 26, 2006 

(Document 2). The affected dates are those set forth in Paragraph 12. The parties propose extending 

these dates 90 days to April 11, April 25, and May 2, 2007, respectively. 

Dated: January 11, 2007 Respectfully Submitted, 

Joel S. Sanders 

Adam Wilson 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

One Montgomery Street 

Montgomery Tower, 31st Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Ronald C. Redcay 

ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 

777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90017-2513 

By:______/s/ Adam Wilson____________ 

 Adam Wilson 

Attorneys for Defendants Micron Technology, 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 4 of 15
5 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

Dated: January 11, 2007 

Inc. and Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. 

Lionel Z. Glancy 

Michael Goldberg 

Susan G. Kupfer 

GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP 

455 Market Street, Suite 1810 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

By:______/s/ Susan G. Kupfer_________ 

 Susan G. Kupfer 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff David Takeda, et al. 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 5 of 15
6 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

DATED: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted: 

 By: /s/ Ted C. Lindquist, III 

Gary L. Halling 

James L. McGinnis 

Ted C. Lindquist, III 

Mona Solouki 

Tiffany Lee 

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & 

HAMPTON LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Attorneys for Defendant Samsung 

Electronics America, Inc. 

DATED: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted: 

 By: /s/ Peter Nemerovski 

 Kenneth O'Rourke 

Peter Nemerovski 

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

400 S. Hope Street 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc. 

DATED: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted: 

 By: /s/ Steven Morrissett 

 Steven Morrissett 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER LLP 

Stanford Research Park 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Attorneys for Defendant Winbond 

Electronics Corporation America 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 6 of 15
7 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

DATED: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted: 

 By: /s/ Paul Griffin 

 Robert Pringle 

Paul Griffin 

Jonathan Swartz 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER LLP 

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Attorneys for Defendant NEC Electronics 

America, Inc. 

DATED: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted: 

 By: /s/ Maura L. Rees 

 Robert P. Feldman 

Maura L. Rees 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & 

ROSATI 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Attorneys for Defendant Cypress 

Semiconductor Corporation 

 

DATED: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted: 

 By: /s/ Kevin C. McCann 

 Kevin C. McCann 

Shinyung Oh 

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & 

WALKER LLP 

55 Second Street, 24th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Attorneys for Defendant Alliance 

Semiconductor Corporation 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 7 of 15
8 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

DATED: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted: 

 By: /s/ Alice W. Detwiler 

 Jeffrey M. Shohet 

Mark H. Hamer 

Alice W. Detwiler 

DLA PIPER US, LLP 

401 B Street 

Suite 1700 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Attorneys for Defendant GSI Technology, 

Inc. 

DATED: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted: 

 By: /s/ Daniel E. Alberti 

 Daniel E. Alberti 

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Attorneys for Defendant Renesas 

Technology America, Inc. 

DATED: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted: 

 By: /s/ Michael D. Lisi 

 Michael D. Lisi 

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & 

ROMAN LLP 

114 Sansome Street 

Suite 400 

San Francisco, CA 94104-3898 

Attorneys for Defendant Mitsubishi Electric 

& Electronics USA, Inc. 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 8 of 15
9 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

DATED: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted: 

 By: /s/ Belinda Lee 

 Belinda Lee 

Andrea Yamamoto 

LATHAM & WATKINS 

633 West Fifth Street 

Suite 4000 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007 

Attorneys for Defendant Toshiba America 

Electronic Components, Inc. 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 9 of 15
10 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:_____________________ __________________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

January 23, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Maria-Elena James

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 10 of 15
11 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

 I, Adam Wilson, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file 

this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Stay Proceeding Or, In The Alternative, Continue 

Case Management Deadlines Pending Decision By Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. I 

hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other 

signatories, and that each of the signatories has provided me with written permission to sign their 

names to this document. 

Dated: January 11, 2007 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By:_______/s/ Adam Wilson_____________ 

 Adam Wilson 

Attorneys for Defendants Micron Technology, 

Inc. and Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 11 of 15
12 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

DECLARATION OF SERVICE 

I, Robin McBain, declare as follows: 

I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California; I am over the age of 

eighteen years and am not a party to this action; my business address is One Montgomery Street, 

Suite 3100, San Francisco, California, 94104, in said County and State. On January 11, 2007, I 

served the within: 

JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL 

PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

to each of the persons named below at the addresses shown as follows: 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff David Takeda

Lionel Z. Glancy 

Michael Goldberg 

GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP 

1801 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 311 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Facsimile: (310) 201-9160 

E-Mail: info@glancylaw.com 

Susan G. Kupfer 

GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP 

455 Market St., Ste. 1810 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Facsimile: (415) 972-8166 

E-Mail: skupfer@glancylaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Alliance Semiconductor Corporation

Kevin C. McCann 

PAUL HASTINGS JANOFSKY & WALKER 

LLP 

55 Second St., 24th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 

E-Mail: kevinmccann@paulhastings.com; 

Attorneys for Respondent Chip-Tech, Ltd.

Steven O. Sidener 

Joseph M. Barton 

C. Andrew Dirksen 

GOLD BENNETT CERA & SIDENER LLP 

595 Market St., Ste. 2300 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2835 

Facsimile: (415) 777-5189 

E-Mail: ssidener@gbcslaw.com; 

jbarton@gbcslaw.com 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 12 of 15
13 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

Attorneys for Defendant GSI Technology, Inc. 

Alice W. Detwiler 

Jeffrey M. Shohet 

Mark H. Hamer 

DLA PIPER US LLP 

401 B Street, Ste. 1700 

San Diego, CA 92101-4297 

Facsimile: (619) 699-2701 

E-Mail: alice.detwiler@dlapiper.com; 

jeffrey.shohet@dlapiper.com; 

mark.hamer@dlapiper.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 

Ted Lindquist 

Gary L. Halling 

James L. McGinnis 

Mona Solouki 

Tiffany Lee 

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & 

HAMPTON LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Facsimile: (415) 434-3947 

E-Mail: ghalling@sheppardmullin.com; 

jmcginnis@sheppardmullin.com; 

msolouki@sheppardmullin.com; 

tilee@sheppardmullin.com; 

tlindquist@sheppardmullin.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc. 

Peter Nemerovski 

Kenneth O’Rourke 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

400 S. Hope St. 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 

E-Mail: pnemerovski@OMM.com; 

korourke@OMM.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Winbond Electronics Corporation America

Steven Morrissett 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER LLP 

Stanford Research Park 

3300 Hillview Ave. 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Facimile: (650) 849-6666 

E-Mail: morrissett@finnegan.com 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 13 of 15
14 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

Attorneys for Defendant Cypress Semiconductor Corporation

Robert P. Feldman 

Maura Rees 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

650 Page Mill Rd. 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 

E-Mail: rfeldman@wsgr.com; mrees@wsgr.com

Attorneys for Defendant Renesas Technology America, Inc.

Daniel E. Alberti 

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 

3150 Porter Dr. 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Facsimile: (650) 813-5100 

E-Mail: dalberti@mwe.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. 

Michael D. Lisi 

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & 

ROMAN LLP 

114 Sansome St., Ste. 400 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Facsimile: (415) 249-8333 

E-Mail: mlisi@kksrr.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.

Belinda Lee 

Andrea Yamamoto 

LATHAM & WATKINS 

633 W. Fifth St., Ste. 4000 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Facsimile: (213) 891-8763 

E-Mail: Andrea.Yamamoto@lw.com; 

Belinda.Lee@lw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant NEC Electronics America, Inc.

Jonathan Swartz 

Paul Griffin 

THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & 

STEINER LLP 

101 Second St., Ste. 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3606 

Facsimile: (415) 371-1211 

E-Mail: jswartz@thelen.com; 

pgriffin@thelen.com 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 14 of 15
15 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, 

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES PENDING DECISION BY JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION; CASE NO. C-06-6663 MEJ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

; BY ELECTRONIC MAIL (E-MAIL): I served via electronic mail the above-detailed documents 

to counsel of record utilizing the e-mail addresses per counsel of records’ pleading caption information and 

per the Court’s docket on January 11, 2007. 

; BY ECF (ELECTRONIC CASE FILING): I e-filed the above-detailed documents utilizing the 

United States District Court, Northern District of California’s mandated ECF (Electronic Case Filing) service 

on January 11, 2007. Counsel of record are required by the Court to be registered e-filers, and as such are 

automatically e-served with a copy of the documents upon confirmation of e-filing.

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, that the foregoing 

document(s) were printed on recycled paper, and that this Declaration of Service was executed by me 

on January 11, 2007, at San Francisco, California. 

 

 /s:/Robin McBain______________ 

 Robin McBain 

100145658_1 

Case 4:06-cv-06663-CW Document 43 Filed 01/23/07 Page 15 of 15