Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00676/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00676-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 1

803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH D. JOHNSON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-0676 LKK PAN P

vs.

JAMES YATES, Warden, et al.,

Respondents FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Petitioner’s application was filed

with the court on March 6, 2006. The court’s own records reveal that on February 28, 2006,

plaintiff filed a petition containing virtually identical habeas claims contesting the same

conviction imposed in Sacramento County, California. (No. Civ. S-05-0554 MCE PAN P). 

1

Due to the duplicative nature of the present action, the court will recommend that the application

be dismissed.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action

be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the District Judge assigned

Case 2:06-cv-00676-LKK -PAN Document 6 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

to this case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being

served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the

court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 15, 2006.

/001; john0676.23

Case 2:06-cv-00676-LKK -PAN Document 6 Filed 06/16/06 Page 2 of 2