Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02660/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02660-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

---

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The courtfurther notes that Plaintiff failed to file a declaration authenticating the exhibits,

as required by Civil Local Rule 7-5(a). Plaintiff is cautioned that any future failure to follow the

procedures set forth in the local rules may result in the offending pleading being stricken from the

record.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAVID HALTERMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

EMC CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 04-2660 JW (PVT)

ORDER RE PARTIES’ FAILURE TO

FILE REQUEST FOR FILING UNDER

SEAL IN CONNECTION WITH

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO QUASH

It has come to this court’s attention that neither party filed a request to seal pursuant to Civil

Local Rule 79-5 with respect to the redacted versions of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s

Motion to Quash, and the exhibits thereto, electronically filed on August 26, 2005.1 Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than September 9, 2005, any party contending that

any of the information redacted from Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Quash, or the

exhibits thereto, warrants protection under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c) shall file a

declaration setting forth facts showing that such sealing is warranted. See CIVIL L.R. 79-5(a).

Dated: 9/2/05

 /s/ Patricia V. Trumbull 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:04-cv-02660-JW Document 118 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 1