Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04725/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04725-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E.K. WADE,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

ELAINE CHAO,

Defendant. /

No. C06-04725 MJJ

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Before the Court is Plaintiff E.K. Wade’s (“Plaintiff’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment. 

(Docket No. 99.) Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) requires that motions filed in the Northern District of

California not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment,

filed on October 12, 2007, is thirty-six (36) pages long. Plaintiff did not file an Administrative

Motion to exceed the applicable page limitations or otherwise request leave to do so. The Court

therefore DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice and VACATES

the November 20, 2007 hearing in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 16, 2007 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-04725-MJJ Document 107 Filed 10/16/07 Page 1 of 1