Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03813/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03813-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ED DAIE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

THE REED GROUP, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 15-03813 WHA

ORDER RE STIPULATION

CONTINUING HEARING

ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

TO DISMISS

Pursuant to the order reassigning this matter, all scheduled dates were vacated and

motions were required to be renoticed for hearing, although briefing schedules remained

unchanged (Dkt. No. 15). At the time of the reassignment, there were two motions to dismiss

pending, scheduled for hearing on October 2. Plaintiff’s responses to those motions are due on

September 10. Although defendants have not renoticed their motions, the parties filed a

stipulation requesting a continuance of the hearing and an extension on the briefing schedule for

the motions to dismiss. This order treats the stipulation as a renotice of the motion, although

defendants should lodge chambers copies of all documents pertaining to this motion. Good

cause shown, plaintiff’s responses shall be due on OCTOBER 1 and defendants’ replies shall be

due on OCTOBER 8. The motion shall be heard on OCTOBER 29 AT 8:00 A.M.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 9, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:15-cv-03813-WHA Document 20 Filed 09/10/15 Page 1 of 1