Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-00790/USCOURTS-cand-3_02-cv-00790-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ABOUT ACCUSED PRODUCTS — No. C 02-790 SI 

[SEE SIGNATURE PAGE FOR ATTORNEY NAMES] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., 

SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC., and 

SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 

and CORDIS CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. C 02-790 SI (filed Feb. 14, 2002) 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

ABOUT ACCUSED PRODUCTS 

[Civil L.R. 7-12] 

CORDIS CORPORATION, 

Counterclaim-Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., 

SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC., and 

SCHNEIDER (EUROPE) GmbH, 

Counterclaim-Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 742 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 746 Filed 10/15/07 Page 1 of 11
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ABOUT ACCUSED PRODUCTS — No. C 02-790 SI 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER

WHEREAS Plaintiffs are asserting infringement of the following U.S. Patents: 

• No. 5,843,032 to Kastenhofer (product claims, issued Dec. 1, 1998) 

• No. 5,961,765 to Kastenhofer (method claims, issued Oct. 5, 1999) 

• No. 6,027,477 to Kastenhofer (product claims, issued Feb. 22, 2000) 

• No. 6,471,673 to Kastenhofer (product claims, issued Oct. 29, 2002), 

WHEREAS Cordis Corporation is asserting infringement of the following U.S. Patent: 

• No. 5,820,594 to Fontirroche (product claims, issued Oct. 13, 1998), and 

WHEREAS the following Exhibits are attached to this stipulation: 

Ex. 1: Value of the catheter portion of Cordis products sold inside the United 

States accused of infringing the Kastenhofer patents under 35 U.S.C. 

§ 271(a) 

Ex. 2: Value of the catheter portion of Cordis products sold outside the United 

States accused of infringing the Kastenhofer patents under 35 U.S.C. 

§ 271(f) 

Ex. 3: Value of the catheter portion of Boston Scientific products accused of 

infringing the Fontirroche ‘594 patent 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED for purposes of this action only that: 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 742 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 11 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 746 Filed 10/15/07 Page 2 of 11
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3- 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ABOUT ACCUSED PRODUCTS — No. C 02-790 SI 

1. If the jury finds one or more of the Kastenhofer patents are not invalid, and infringed 

under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by Cordis products sold inside the United States, then Exhibit 1 sets forth 

the value of the catheter portion of such products. 

2. If the jury finds one or more of the Kastenhofer patents are not invalid, and infringed 

under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f) by Cordis products sold outside the United States, then Exhibit 2 sets forth 

the value of the catheter portion of such products. 

3. For purposes of infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f), the Cordis product in Exhibit 

2 named “Cypher Rx” shall be deemed to include a WorldPass catheter with an inner body made 

inside the United States. 

4. If the jury finds the Fontirroche ‘594 patent infringed under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by 

Plaintiffs’ products, then Exhibit 3 sets forth the value of the catheter portion of such products. 

5. In the event that some but not all of the Kastenhofer patents are found invalid or not 

infringed, the parties agree that the Court may apportion the damages in an accounting to reflect the 

products and period of sales associated with the subset of Kastenhofer patents found infringed and 

not invalid. 

6. The date of the hypothetical negotiation for the Kastenhofer patents shall be 

December 1998. The date of the hypothetical negotiation for the Fontirroche ‘594 patent shall be 

October 1998. 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 742 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 3 of 11 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 746 Filed 10/15/07 Page 3 of 11
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-4- 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ABOUT ACCUSED PRODUCTS — No. C 02-790 SI 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: October 12, 2007 

By: /s/ Dominic E. Massa 

William F. Lee (Admitted in N.D. Cal.) 

(william.lee@wilmerhale.com) 

Dominic E. Massa (Pro Hac Vice) 

(dominic.massa@wilmerhale.com) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

AND DORR LLP 

60 State Street 

Boston, Massachusetts 02109 

Telephone: (617) 526-6000 

Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 

Mark D. Selwyn (SBN 244180) 

Nathan L. Walker (SBN 206128) 

Christine Duh (SBN 228544) 

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

AND DORR LLP 

1117 California Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 858-6000 

Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Counterclaim 

Defendants BOSTON SCIENTIFIC 

CORPORATION, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC 

SCIMED, INC., SCIMED LIFE 

SYSTEMS, INC., and SCHNEIDER 

(EUROPE) GmbH 

By: /s/ David T. Pritikin 

Robert B. Morrill (SBN 035488) 

(rmorrill@sidley.com) 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 772-1200 

Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 

David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice) 

(dpritikin@sidley.com) 

William H. Baumgartner, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) 

(wbaumgartner@sidley.com) 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

One South Dearborn Street 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

Telephone: (312) 853-7000 

Facsimile: (312) 853-7036 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JOHNSON & JOHNSON and 

CORDIS CORPORATION

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 742 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 4 of 11 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 746 Filed 10/15/07 Page 4 of 11
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-5- 

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ABOUT ACCUSED PRODUCTS — No. C 02-790 SI 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________________ ____________________________________ 

 SUSAN ILLSTON 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 742 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 5 of 11 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 746 Filed 10/15/07 Page 5 of 11
Exhibit 1

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 742 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 6 of 11 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 746 Filed 10/15/07 Page 6 of 11
Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Johnson & Johnson et al., No. 02-790 SI (N.D. Cal. Filed Feb. 14, 2002)

Value of the catheter portion of Cordis products sold inside the United States accused of infringing the Kastenhofer patents under 35 UBX Sonic Over-the-Wire BX Sonic with Hepacoat BX Velocity on Raptor BX Velocity with Hepacoat on Raptor Charger CrossFlex Over-the-Wire Cypher Over-the-Wire Jupiter NC Raptor Ninja Ninja FX Raptor Titan Titan Mega Trakstar Valor Aviator BX Velocity on Raptorrail BX Velocity with Hepacoat on Raptorrail Cypher Rapid-Exchange Palmaz Genesis on Aviator Raptorrail Total 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 746 Filed 10/15/07 Page 7 of 11
Exhibit 2

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 742 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 8 of 11 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 746 Filed 10/15/07 Page 8 of 11
Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Johnson & Johnson et al., No. 02-790 SI (N.D. Cal. Filed Feb. 14, 2002)

Value of the catheter portion of Cordis products sold outside the United States accused of infringing the Kastenhofer patents under BX Sonic RX BX Velocity BX Velocity RX BX Velocity with Hepacoat (OTW) BX Velocity with Hepacoat RX CrossFlex LC RX Cypher RX OmniPass Tacker WorldPass Total 

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 746 Filed 10/15/07 Page 9 of 11
Exhibit 3

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 742 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 10 of 11 Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 746 Filed 10/15/07 Page 10 of 11
Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Johnson & Johnson et al., No. 02-790 SI (N.D. Cal. Filed Feb. 14, 2002)

Value of the catheter portion of Boston Scientific products accused of infringing the Fontirroche '594 patent

Sold in the U.S. Sold outside the U.S.

Taxus Express2 RX $356,560,256 $89,563,877Taxus Express2 OTW $140,252,012 $898Taxus Liberte RX - $37,268,794Express2 RX $63,333,824 $4,333,333Express2 OTW $28,660,263 $1,048Liberte OTW $4,262,995 -Liberte RX $12,783,801 $53,094,291Maverick OTW $201,255,768 $46,658,921Maverick RX $21,588,879 $1,274,100Maverick2 RX $326,849,244 $27,584,025Maverick XL $4,132,930 $6,503,836Quantum Maverick OTW $43,073,407 $149,689Quantum Maverick RX $142,786,269 $182,529,686UltraSoft SV $10,238,376 $19,037,502

Total $1,355,778,024 $468,000,000 $1,823,778,024

Case 3:02-cv-00790-SI Document 746 Filed 10/15/07 Page 11 of 11