Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05295/USCOURTS-caed-1_03-cv-05295-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BALTAZAR GODOY-AGUIRRE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHARLES GILKEY, et.al.,

Defendants.

 /

CV F 03 5295 OWW LJO P 

ORDER VACATING HEARING SET FOR

MARCH 20, 2006, 10:00 A.M., COURTROOM

3.

 Baltazar Godoy-Aguirre (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On February 8, 2006, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss and noticed that motion on

the calendar of the undersigned. However, pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(m) “all motions . . .

filed in cases wherein one party is incarcerated and proceeding in propria persona, shall be

submitted upon the record and without oral argument unless otherwise ordered.” Local Rule 78-

230(m). While the Court recognizes that Plaintiff may no longer be in state custody, it is this

Case 1:03-cv-05295-OWW -LJO Document 91 Filed 02/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court’s practice to apply the provision of Local Rule 78-230(m) to all prisoner cases even in the

event the Plaintiff has been released from custody. Should the Court find a hearing requiring the

presence of the parties necessary, it shall so order. Accordingly, the Court exercises its discretion

to continue to apply the Rule 78-230(m) to this case. 

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS: 

1. The hearing noticed on the Motion calendar for March 20, 2006, is HEREBY

VACATED. 

The Court will resolve the Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary

Judgment in due course. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 9, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-05295-OWW -LJO Document 91 Filed 02/09/06 Page 2 of 2