Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-02243/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-02243-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 Gary Thompson,

 Plaintiff(s),

 v.

City and County of San Francisco,

et al.,

 Defendants.

___________________________/

No. C 03-2243 WDB

ORDER 

 The parties have informed the Court that they have settled the above-referenced

case contingent upon the San Francisco Board of Supervisor's approval. See parties'

correspondence, filed October 24, 2005. The Court congratulates the parties and their

attorneys for their efforts in this regard.

Plaintiff's motion to extend the discovery cut-off, scheduled for hearing

November 7, 2005, defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's Third Amended

Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), scheduled for hearing November 15, 2005, the

final pretrial conference scheduled to occur on March 14, 2006, and the trial

scheduled to begin March 28, 2006, are hereby VACATED.

Case 4:03-cv-02243-WDB Document 105 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defense counsel must promptly e-file a letter describing the time-frame during

which he anticipates the San Francisco Board of Supervisors will review the

settlement.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2005 

WAYNE D. BRAZIL

United States Magistrate Judge

Copies to: Parties,

WDB, stats.

Case 4:03-cv-02243-WDB Document 105 Filed 10/25/05 Page 2 of 2