Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04876/USCOURTS-cand-5_14-cv-04876-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER KYLE PRATER,

Plaintiff,

v.

IRVIN GOODWIN, HVEHF VETERAN 

CENTER,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:14-cv-04876-HRL

INTERIM ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S

DISCOVERY DISPUTE REPORTS

Plaintiff’s “Discovery Dispute Joint Report Number 3”

1

seeks an order compelling 

defendants to respond to plaintiff’s Interrogatories 1-17. As presented, however, the court is 

unable to properly evaluate these interrogatories and all of defendants’ objections to them. 

Plaintiff has merely purported to summarize the text of some interrogatories and defendants’

responses. No later than January 5, 2015, plaintiff shall submit to the court an actual copy of 

Interrogatories 1-17 he served on defendants, as well as a copy of the responses defendants served 

on him. Plaintiff shall submit this document without any further argument on this pending 

DDJR. Any such argument submitted in violation of this order will be stricken and will not 

be considered.

 

1

This is actually DDJR No. 4. However, to avoid further confusion, this court will refer to this 

DDJR as numbered by plaintiff.

Case 5:14-cv-04876-HRL Document 73 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Plaintiff’s “Discovery Dispute Joint Report Number 4”

2

seeks an order compelling 

defendants to produce documents responsive to plaintiff’s Requests for Production 1-16. As 

presented, the court is unable to properly evaluate these requests or defendants’ objections to 

them. No later than January 5, 2015, plaintiff shall submit to the court an actual copy of the 

Requests for Production 1-16 he served on defendants, as well as a copy of the responses 

defendants served on him. Plaintiff shall submit this document without any further argument 

on this pending DDJR. Any such argument submitted in violation of this order will be 

stricken and will not be considered.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 15, 2015

________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

United States Magistrate Judge

 

2

This is actually DDJR No. 5. However, to avoid further confusion, this court will refer to this 

DDJR as numbered by plaintiff.

Case 5:14-cv-04876-HRL Document 73 Filed 12/15/15 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

5:14-cv-04876-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Christopher Kyle Prater kcprater74@gmail.com

Jennifer J. Capabianco jcapabianco@selmanbreitman.com, ttaylor@selmanbreitman.com

Case 5:14-cv-04876-HRL Document 73 Filed 12/15/15 Page 3 of 3