Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04959/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04959-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

ORDER 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

GARY M. LEPPER, SBN 45498 

LEPPER & HARRINGTON 

1600 S. Main Street, Suite 305 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Telephone: (925) 256-6180 

Facsimile: (925) 943-6190 

Attorneys for Defendant 

County of Lake 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PSG PROPERTIES AND SUPPORT INC., 

FRANK COSTANZO, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COUNTY OF LAKE, CALIFORNIA, and 

DOES 1 through 15, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No: C 04 4959 CRB (EMC) 

ORDER VACATING PRIOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE DENIAL OF USE 

PERMIT BY THE LAKE COUNTY 

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; 

REFERRING FOR FURTHER 

CONSIDERATION; AND SETTING 

FURTHER TELEPHONIC 

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

 On November 17, 2004, the Lake County Board of Supervisors held a further hearing on a 

citizens’ appeal from the Lake County Planning Commission’s approval of PSG Properties and 

Support Inc.’s application for a use permit for a community care facility at PSG site (located at 9890 

and 10155 Socrates Mine Road, Middletown; APN013-058-11 and 013-058-12). On December 21, 

2004, the Board denied the use permit application and granted the appeal of “Anderson Springs 

Community Alliance,” though solely citing the need for further analysis and recommendations 

regarding the site’s wastewater disposal system. 

 The Board’s December 21, 2004 denial is hereby vacated and referred to the Board for the 

single determination, on or before April 18, 2006, whether the use permit application should be 

granted in light of the wastewater disposal system analysis since submitted by PSG to Lake County 

(pursuant to prior stipulation between the parties and consequent order). 

Case 3:04-cv-04959-CRB Document 35 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 2
ORDER 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

 Consistent with the “Stipulation and Order” of May 23, 2005 and the “Further Stipulation 

and Order” of October 23, 2005, (1) inter-party discovery will remain stayed and (2) enforcement, 

direct or indirect, by Lake County against the plaintiffs for lack of an use permit will not be 

undertaken. 

 A further telephone conference is set for April 21, 2006, at 9:30 a.m., to ascertain whether 

the use permit has been issued and to decide what further proceedings may be appropriate. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March ___, 2006 

 ________________________________ 

 EDWARD M. CHEN 

 Magistrate Judge 

 Approved as to form. 

 LAW OFFICES OF NEIL JON BLOOMFIELD 

 /s/ Neil Jon Bloomfield 

 ___________________________ 

 NEIL JON BLOOMFIELD 

 Attorney for plaintiffs, PSG, et al. 

 LEPPER & HARRINGTON 

 /s/ Gary M. Leper 

 __________________________ 

 GARY M. LEPPER 

 Attorneys for defendant, County of Lake

30 U.S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:04-cv-04959-CRB Document 35 Filed 03/30/06 Page 2 of 2