Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00538/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00538-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT PRETRIAL CONF A ERENCE STATEMENT CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-1203-AWI-JLT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD PHILLIPS, in his capacity as 

administrator of the ESTATE OF TROY 

PHILLIPS; TIFFANY PHILLIPS,

 Plaintiffs,

 

 vs.

COUNTY OF FRESNO; MARGARED 

MIMS; TOM GATTIE; RICK HILL; 

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER L. HER 

#9899; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER K. 

YANG; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER 

CASTRO; JOHN DOE AND RICHARD 

ROE, individually and in their capacities as 

correctional officers of the Fresno County 

Sheriff’s Department, the exact numbers of 

whom are unknown to plaintiffs at this time; 

EDWARD MORENO M.D.; GEORGE 

LAIRD; PRATAP NARAYAN; NANCY 

POE and CARL COE, individually and in 

their capacities as health care workers in the 

Fresno County jail system, the identities and 

exact numbers of whom are unknown to 

plaintiffs at this time; DOES 1-50, 

 

 Defendants. 

 

1:13-cv-0538 AWI BAM

ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE 

OF JULY 22, 2013, AND TAKING 

MATTER UNDER SUBMISSION

In this action for damages, defendants County of Fresno, et al. (“Defendants”) have 

moved to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Richard Phillips (“Plaintiff”). The matter was 

scheduled for oral argument to be held on July 22, 2013. The Court has reviewed Defendants’ 

Case 1:13-cv-00538-AWI-BAM Document 27 Filed 07/18/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

JOINT PRETRIAL CONF A ERENCE STATEMENT CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-1203-AWI-JLT

Motion, Plaintiff’s opposition, Defendants’ reply, the accompanying documents, and the 

applicable law, and has determined that the Motion is suitable for decision without oral 

argument. Local Rule 78-230(h). 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of 

July 22, 2013, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of July 22, 2013, the 

Court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 17, 2013 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

0m8i788

Case 1:13-cv-00538-AWI-BAM Document 27 Filed 07/18/13 Page 2 of 2