Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01909/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-01909-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 443
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Housing Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LaRELL FRANKLIN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

ALLSTATE CORPORATION et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-06-1909 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING ALLSTATE AND

EFI DEFENDANTS TO LODGE

CHAMBERS COPIES IN COMPLIANCE

WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On August 18, 2006, defendants Accredited Home Lenders, Inc. and Countrywide

Home Loans, Inc. (“Accredited defendants”) electronically filed their reply in support of their

motion to dismiss. On the same date, defendants EFI Engineering and Fire Investigations

and George S. Alboff (“EFI defendants”) electronically filed their reply in support of their

separate motion to dismiss. The Accredited and EFI defendants have violated General

Order 45 and the Court’s standing orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office

“no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers are filed

electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . . marked

‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and

‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VII.G; see also Standing Orders

For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

The Accredited and EFI defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with General

Order 45 and the Court’s standing orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of

Case 3:06-cv-01909-MMC Document 89 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the above-referenced documents. The Accredited and EFI defendants are hereby advised

that if either of them fails in the future to comply with the Court’s order to provide chambers

copies of electronically-filed documents, the Court may impose sanctions on the

noncomplying party, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any electronicallyfiled document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2006 MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:06-cv-01909-MMC Document 89 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 2