Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-03596/USCOURTS-cand-5_03-cv-03596-9/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT— Case Nos. MDL-1423, 03-03596 

E-filed on 6/13/07

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE CYGNUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS

TECHNOLOGY, LLC, PATENT

LITIGATION

______________________________________

CYGNUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS

TECHNOLOGY, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED WORLD TELECOM, L.C., 

Defendant.

No. MDL-1423

This Judgment Applies to:

 C-03-03596 RMW 

AMENDED JUDGMENT

On March 30, 2007, pursuant to its Claim Construction Order and Orders on Various

Summary Judgment Motions dated March 29, 2007, the court purported to enter final judgment

declaring that the patents-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 5,883,964 and U.S. Patent No. 6,035,027, are

invalid under the on-sale bar of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and that defendant United World Telecom does

not infringe either patent. 

The court's judgment did not address the remaining declaratory judgment counterclaims

brought by defendant United World Telecom against plaintiff seeking declarations that the patents

are invalid under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 and 112 and that the patents are not enforceable due to

Case 5:03-cv-03596-RMW Document 153 Filed 06/13/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT— Case Nos. MDL-1423, 03-03596 

2

inequitable conduct and fraud before the patent office. The court inadvertently failed to include a

direction for final entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. § 54(b) on the claims resolved. 

Therefore, the court hereby directs that final judgment be entered: (1) declaring the '964 and '027

patents invalid based upon the on-sale bar; and (2) adjudging that plaintiff take nothing on its claim

of patent infringement. The court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay in the

entry of final judgment because the remaining counterclaims have been rendered moot and will only

become ripe for decision if this judgment is reversed.

DATED: 6/13/07 

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:03-cv-03596-RMW Document 153 Filed 06/13/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT— Case Nos. MDL-1423, 03-03596 

3

A copy of this judgment was mailed on 6/13/07 to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

John P. Sutton

2421 Pierce Street

San Francisco, CA 94115-1131

Counsel for Defendants:

Alan M. Weisberg, Steven M. Greenberg 

Christopher & Weisberg, P.A. 

200 E. Las Olas Avenue, Suite 2040 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 

John C. Carey 

Rodriguez Greenberg & Paul

1395 Brickell Ave, Suite 700

Miami, FL 33131 

Courtesy Copy:

Clerk of the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building

One Columbus Circle, N.E.

Room G-255, North Lobby

Washington, DC 20002-8004

Counsel is responsible for distributing copies of this order to co-counsel, as necessary.

Case 5:03-cv-03596-RMW Document 153 Filed 06/13/07 Page 3 of 3