Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00340/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00340-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Craig Reed is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On January 7, 2014, the Magistrate Judge dismissed Plaintiff’s first amended complaint 

with leave to amend. See Doc. No. 15. On January 28, 2014, the Magistrate Judge granted 

Plaintiff additional time to file an amended complaint. See Doc. No. 17. On March 5, 2014, 

Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. See Doc. No. 18. On March 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed 

objections to the January 7 dismissal order by the Magistrate Judge. See Doc. No. 19.

Plaintiff’s objections relate to actions taken with respect to the First Amended Complaint. 

However, all claims were dismissed with leave to amend, see Doc. No. 15, and with the filing of 

the Second Amended Complaint, the First Amended Complaint became nonexistent. See Ferdik 

v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992). The active complaint is the Second Amended 

Complaint, and that complaint will be screened by the Magistrate Judge in accordance with the 

proper legal standards. Plaintiff’s objections relate to actions regarding a now nonexistent 

complaint. Plaintiff’s objections are untimely and moot. 

CRAIG REED,

Plaintiff

v.

SGT. HINSHAW, et al.,

Defendants

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-340 AWI SAB (PC) 

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S 

OBJECTIONS

(Doc. No. 19)

Case 1:11-cv-00340-AWI-SAB Document 20 Filed 05/09/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. No. 19) are 

OVERRULED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 9, 2014 

 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00340-AWI-SAB Document 20 Filed 05/09/14 Page 2 of 2