Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00513/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00513-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER K. JONES, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

IVAN D. CLAY, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:07-CV-00513 OWW NEW (DLB) HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #10]

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS WITH LEAVE TO

AMEND 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On May 10, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED with leave to amend for failure

to state a cognizable claim for relief. This Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties

and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed

within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. Over thirty (30) days have passed and no

party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:07-cv-00513-OWW -LJO Document 11 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued May 10, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; 

3. Petitioner is GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order to file an

amended petition in accordance with the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 

Petitioner is advised that failure to comply with the Court’s order may result in dismissal of

the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 21, 2007 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00513-OWW -LJO Document 11 Filed 07/23/07 Page 2 of 2