Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02163/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02163-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1This order should not be read as accepting all of the proposed jury instructions and

special verdict forms to which no objections were filed. To the contrary, the Court may find

reasons for rejecting some or all of the proposals even in the absence of objections from the

opposing party.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EASA BEGZAD,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF HAYWARD, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C03-2163 TEH 

ORDER RE: WAIVED

OBJECTIONS

The deadline for filing objections to disputed jury instructions and special verdict forms

passed on May 31, 2005. The only objections filed with the Court were Defendants’

objections to Plaintiff’s separately proposed jury instructions. Therefore, Plaintiff has waived

any objections to Defendants’ separately proposed jury instructions and special verdict form,

and Defendants have waived any objections to Plaintiff’s proposed special verdict form.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED 06/03/05 /s/ 

 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:03-cv-02163-TEH Document 232 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 1