Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04409/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04409-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

Case No. 3:06-CV-04409-SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CMC 

 

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

WILLIAM F. ABRAMS (SBN 88805) 

william.abrams@bingham.com 

RAYMIS H. KIM (SBN 167591) 

raymis.kim@bingham.com 

PATRICK T. WESTON (SBN 211448) 

patrick.weston@bingham.com 

1900 University Avenue 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2223 

Telephone: 650.849.4400 

Facsimile: 650.849.4800 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MEDISON AMERICA, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MEDISON AMERICA, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VOLUMETRICS MEDICAL IMAGING, L.L.C., 

Defendant. 

No. 3:06-CV-04409-SI 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER REGARDING 

CONTINUANCE OF CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Date: October 19, 2007 

Time: 2:30 p.m. 

Courtroom: 10 

Judge: Hon. Susan Illston 

1. The parties agree to continue the Case Management Conference in the 

above-entitled action until resolution of Medison America’s pending motion to dismiss for lack 

of standing of a related patent case involving both Medison America and VMI before the District 

Court in the Middle District of North Carolina, Greensboro Division, Civil Action 

No. 1:05CV00955. That motion has now been set for hearing before Judge Tilley in Greensboro, 

North Carolina on October 23, 2007. 

2. The parties agree to promptly notify the Court upon entry of an order 

Case 3:06-cv-04409-SI Document 42 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:06-cv-04409-SI Document 43 Filed 10/11/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

2 Case No. 3:06-CV-04409-SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CMC 

 

granting or denying Medison America’s pending motion to dismiss, at which time the parties 

will respectfully request a further Case Management Conference to be held 45 days after entry of 

said order. 

DATED: October 9, 2007 Respectfully Submitted, 

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 

By: /s/ William F. Abrams 

 William F. Abrams 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Medison America, Inc. 

DATED: October 9, 2007 Respectfully Submitted, 

By its attorneys, 

BERGESON, LLP 

By: /s/ Donald P. Gagliardi 

Donald P. Gagliardi 

Donald P. Gagliardi 

Bergeson, LLP 

303 Almaden Blvd. 

Suite 500 

San Jose, CA 95110-2712 

Appearing Specially for Defendant 

VOLUMETRICS MEDICAL IMAGING, 

L.L.C. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-04409-SI Document 42 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 2 of 3

The case management conference has been continued to Friday, 

December 14, 2007, at 2:30 p.m. (joint statuement due one week 

prior)

Case 3:06-cv-04409-SI Document 43 Filed 10/11/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

3 Case No. 3:06-CV-04409-SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CMC 

 

CERTIFICATION BY RUBY M. WAYNE PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE NO. 45, 

SECTION X. RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

1. I am a lawyer licensed to practice law in the State of California, and am a counsel 

in the law firm of Bingham McCutchen LLP, counsel for plaintiff Medison America. The 

statements herein are made on my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness I could and 

would testify thereto. 

2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that 

concurrence has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared 

document with the Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support 

this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon 

request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 

foregoing is true and correct on October 9, 2007. 

 /s/ Ruby M. Wayne 

 Ruby M. Wayne 

Case 3:06-cv-04409-SI Document 42 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 3 of 3 Case 3:06-cv-04409-SI Document 43 Filed 10/11/07 Page 3 of 3