Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00343/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00343-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Charlston, Revich

& Chamberlin LLP

ADMIRAL stipulation

final jgm.wpd

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: ABSENCE OF ANY DISPUTED FACTS TO PRECLUDE

ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ADMIRAL

Robert D. Hoffman, SBN 123458

CHARLSTON, REVICH & CHAMBERLIN LLP

1925 Century Park East, Suite 1250

Los Angeles, California 90067-2746

(310) 551-7000

(310) 203-9321 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Plaintiff Admiral Insurance Company

Stephen C. Johnson, SBN 145210

DEMPSEY & JOHNSON LLP

1880 Century Park East, Suite 516

Los Angeles, California 90067

(310) 551-2333

(310) 203-2301 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Defendants J Dale Debber, Lorna

Martin, Data Control Corporation, Aristos Academy,

Compline, LLC, Providence Publications LLC, 

Real Consulting & Software Development, LLC, 

and Debber Family Foundation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a

Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. DALE DEBBER; LORNA MARTIN; DATA

CONTROL CORPORATION; ARISTOS

ACADEMY; COMPLINE, LLC; PROVIDENCE

PUBLICATIONS, LLC; REAL CONSULTING &

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC; DEBBER

FAMILY FOUNDATION; VICKIE ALTMAN;

and SCOTT ALTMAN,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:05-CV-00343-FCD-EFB

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:

ABSENCE OF ANY DISPUTED FACTS

TO PRECLUDE ENTRY OF FINAL

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF

ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Case 2:05-cv-00343-FCD-EFB Document 56 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Charlston, Revich

& Chamberlin LLP

ADMIRAL stipulation

final jgm.wpd

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: ABSENCE OF ANY DISPUTED FACTS TO PRECLUDE

ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ADMIRAL

2

WHEREAS, on February 22, 2005, plaintiff Admiral Insurance Company (“Admiral”)

filed a complaint (“Complaint”) that sought, in the first and second claims for relief, the rescission

of the employment practices liability insurance policies issued by Admiral to Data Control

Corporation (“DCC”) for the policy period December 13, 2002 to December 13, 2003 bearing

policy No. 4343312/1 (“2002 Policy”) and December 13, 2003 to December 13, 2004 bearing

policy No. 4343312/2 (“2003 Policy”) (collectively “Admiral Policies”);

WHEREAS the third claim for relief of the Complaint sought reimbursement from

defendants J Dale Debber, Lorna Martin, Data Control Corporation, Aristos Academy, Compline,

LLC, Providence Publications LLC, Real Consulting & Software Development, LLC, and Debber

Family Foundation (collectively “DCC Parties”) of the amounts paid by Admiral pursuant to the

2003 Policy to defend the claims (“Altman Claims”) asserted against the DCC Parties by Vickie

and Scott Altman (“Altmans”) in the now-dismissed action filed by the Altmans in Nevada

County Superior Court, captioned Vickie Altman, et al. v. J Dale Debber, et al., bearing case No.

69850;

WHEREAS, on November 15, 2005, Admiral filed, pursuant to an order and stipulation of

the parties, a first amended complaint (“Amended Complaint”) that added a fourth claim for relief

for reimbursement from the DCC Parties of the amount paid by Admiral pursuant to the 2003

Policy to fund the entirety of the Offer of Judgment that had been accepted by the Altmans and

that resolved the Altman Claims; 

WHEREAS, on July 20, 2006, this Court entered an Order granting Admiral’s motion for

summary adjudication to rescind the Admiral Policies and denying the DCC Parties’ motion for

summary judgment;

WHEREAS, it is undisputed that Admiral paid $125,733.87 (“Defense Payment”)

pursuant to the 2003 Policy for the defense of the Altman Claims, comprised of the following

payments to defense counsel retained by the DCC Parties: March 4, 2005 payment of $78,857.87;

August 31, 2005 payments of $2,362.50 and $6,916.00; September 9, 2005 payment of $8,289.00;

November 15, 2005 payments of $765.00 and $28,543.50; 

WHEREAS, it is undisputed that on September 26, 2005, Admiral issued a payment of

Case 2:05-cv-00343-FCD-EFB Document 56 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Charlston, Revich

& Chamberlin LLP

ADMIRAL stipulation

final jgm.wpd

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: ABSENCE OF ANY DISPUTED FACTS TO PRECLUDE

ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ADMIRAL

3

$350,000.00, pursuant to the 2003 Policy, to fund the DCC Parties’ Offer of Judgment that had

been accepted by the Altmans (“Indemnity Payment”);

WHEREAS, the Defense and Indemnity Payments are the subject, respectively, of

Admiral’s third and fourth claims for relief in the Amended Complaint and by virtue of the

Court’s July 20, 2006 Order, no other claims remain in this action;

WHEREAS, there are no remaining parties to this Action other than Admiral and the DCC

Parties (collectively the “Parties”);

WHEREAS, no dispute exists between the Parties as to the amount of the Defense and

Indemnity Payments that were paid by Admiral pursuant to the 2003 Policy;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between plaintiff Admiral and the

DCC Parties, through their respective counsel, as follows:

1. By virtue of the Court’s ruling on July 20, 2006 rescinding the Admiral Policies,

no issues remain in dispute that require trial or that would prevent the Court from entering a

money judgment in favor of Admiral in the amount indisputably paid by Admiral under the 2003

Policy. Accordingly, the Court is entitled to enter a final judgment (“Judgment”) in favor of

Admiral as to all claims for relief in the Amended Complaint and providing that Admiral shall

recover from the DCC Parties the sum of $475,733.87 with post-judgment interest thereon at the

applicable rate as provided by law and costs in an amount to be determined by the Clerk.

2. Although the parties have stipulated to the absence of disputed facts set forth

herein so as to allow the entry of a final judgment, the right to appeal is expressly reserved.

3. The Judgment in the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A” may be entered by the

Court without the necessity of the Parties proceeding with the Final Pretrial Conference scheduled

for September 22, 2006 or the trial scheduled for November 28, 2006.

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:05-cv-00343-FCD-EFB Document 56 Filed 09/21/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Charlston, Revich

& Chamberlin LLP

ADMIRAL stipulation

final jgm.wpd

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: ABSENCE OF ANY DISPUTED FACTS TO PRECLUDE

ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ADMIRAL

4

Dated: September __, 2006 CHARLSTON, REVICH & CHAMBERLIN LLP

ROBERT D. HOFFMAN

 By: ________________________________________

Robert D. Hoffman

Attorneys for Plaintiff Admiral Insurance Company

Dated: September __, 2006 DEMPSEY & JOHNSON LLP

STEPHEN C. JOHNSON

 By: ________________________________________

Stephen C. Johnson

Attorneys for Defendants J Dale Debber, Lorna Martin, Data

Control Corporation, Aristos Academy, Compline, LLC,

Providence Publications LLC, Real Consulting & Software

Development, LLC, and Debber Family Foundation

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 21, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00343-FCD-EFB Document 56 Filed 09/21/06 Page 4 of 4