Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00917/USCOURTS-caed-1_23-cv-00917-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARABELLA FAIRCHILD,

1

Plaintiff,

v.

VANG, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 1:23-cv-00917 JLT GSA (PC)

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS 

AND RECOMMENDATIONS DUE 

FEBRUARY 20, 2024

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO 

AMEND COMPLAINT

(ECF No. 7)

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT 

DUE MARCH 6, 2024

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

REQUESTING INITIAL CASE 

DOCUMENTS BE SENT TO HER

(ECF No. 10)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 

UPDATE CASE CAPTION TO REFLECT 

ALL NAMES AND/OR ALIASES USED BY 

PLAINTIFF

1

 As explained herein, having reviewed the Court’s case filing database, it appears that Plaintiff 

has used several different names when filing matters in this Court. Therefore, the Clerk of Court 

will be ordered to update the case caption of the docket in this and in all other cases filed by 

Plaintiff with all names and/or aliases used by Plaintiff.

Case 1:23-cv-00917-JLT-GSA Document 13 Filed 02/06/24 Page 1 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

ORDER RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE 

RELIEF BE DENIED

(ECF No. 9)

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. The matter was referred to 

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

Before this Court are: (1) Plaintiff’s motion to file an amended complaint; (2) Plaintiff’s 

motion for injunctive relief, and (3) Plaintiff’s motion that initial documents filed in this matter be 

sent to her. ECF Nos. 7, 9 and 10, respectively. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s motion 

to file an amended complaint and her motion that she be sent certain documents initially filed in 

this case will be granted. In addition, the Clerk of Court will be ordered to change the case 

caption of the docket to include all names and/or aliases used by Plaintiff in all cases that have 

been filed in this Court. Finally, it will be recommended that Plaintiff’s motion for emergency 

injunctive relief be denied.

I. MOTION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

In July 2023, Plaintiff filed objections to the Court’s order which recommended that she 

be required to pay the filing fee in this matter. ECF No. 7. Within those objections, Plaintiff also 

filed a motion to amend her complaint. Id. at 2.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) permits a party to amend a pleading with leave 

of court and when justice so requires. Given that the original complaint has not yet been 

screened, there are no other parties who will be affected if Plaintiff is granted leave to amend. 

Furthermore, Plaintiff should be given the opportunity to present as complete a complaint to the 

Court as possible prior to it being served. For these reasons, Plaintiff’s motion to amend will be 

granted. Plaintiff must, however, file the amended complaint on the form that will be provided to 

her by the Clerk of Court, and she must carefully follow the directions provided in this order 

related to filing of an amended complaint.

Case 1:23-cv-00917-JLT-GSA Document 13 Filed 02/06/24 Page 2 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

II. MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

A. Relevant Facts

In Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, she ultimately states that money to pay 

restitution has been wrongfully taken from her trust fund account. ECF No. 9 at 2-3. Citing to 

state codes and regulations, she argues that the statute of limitations for restitution to be taken in 

her cases has lapsed and that a smaller amount should be debited from her trust account. See ECF 

No. 9 at 2-4. She further alleges that other inmates have had similar experiences with funds being 

improperly deducted from their accounts. See id. at 4-5.

Plaintiff contends that the deduction of funds from her account violates her First, Fourth, 

and Fourteenth Amendment rights. ECF No. 9 at 5. She requests the Court to issue an order 

removing the restitution fine county case from “active” status and from her inmate prison 

statement report. ECF No. 9 at 5-6. She also asks the Court to order that all monies taken from 

her account for restitution of her county case be returned.2 Id. at 6. 

B. Discussion

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief must be denied at the outset. This is so because as 

of now no named defendants have been served in this case, which means that at this point the 

Court has no jurisdiction over persons who Plaintiff names in her complaint and believes have

improperly taken funds from her trust account. “A federal court may issue an injunction if it has

personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the claim; it may not

attempt to determine the rights of persons not before the court.” Zepeda v. I.N.S., 753 F.2d 719, 

727 (9th Cir. 1983); see Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 395 U.S. 100, 110 (1969) 

(“The consistent constitutional rule has been that a court has no power to adjudicate a personal 

claim or obligation unless it has jurisdiction over the person of the defendant.”).

2

 Plaintiff also inquires whether other similarly situated inmates may be added to her case. ECF 

No. 9 at 6-7. The answer is “No.” “A litigant appearing in propria persona has no authority to 

represent anyone other than himself.” Russell v. United States, 308 F.2d 78, 79 (9th Cir. 1962); 

see also McShane v. United States, 366 F.2d 286, 288 (9th Cir. 1966) (privilege to appear without 

counsel is personal to the litigant). personal to the litigant).

Case 1:23-cv-00917-JLT-GSA Document 13 Filed 02/06/24 Page 3 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

III. REQUEST FOR CERTAIN DOCUMENTS

Plaintiff has also filed a motion requesting that “initial case documents” be sent to her. 

ECF No. 10 at 1. It is unclear from the motion and its attachments whether Plaintiff is asking that 

the Court re-send her copies of the prisoner new case documents, a copy of her original 

complaint, or both. See generally ECF No. 1.

Plaintiff is informed that there is a charge per page to receive copies of documents from 

the Court. However, as a one-time courtesy, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion and direct the 

Clerk of Court to again send Plaintiff copies of the prisoner new case documents, the consent 

form, as well as a copy of Plaintiff’s complaint. Future requests for free copies from the Court 

will likely be denied.

IV. UPDATE OF PLAINTIFF’S NAMES AND/OR ALIASES ON CASE DOCKETS

Finally, the Court notes that Plaintiff’s prison identification number is: X-27638. See

ECF No. 1 at 1 (Plaintiff’s prisoner ID number on case caption of complaint). The Court also

takes judicial notice3of the fact that Plaintiff has filed several cases in the Eastern District with 

this prisoner ID number, and has used significantly different names.

For example, in this matter, Plaintiff goes by the name “Arabella Fairchild.” See ECF No. 

1 at 1 (case caption of complaint). However, in Fairchild-Littlefield v. Shaffer, No. 1:19-cv00499 DAD JDP; Fairchild-Littlefield v Attinello, No. 1:19-cv-01579 JLT GSA, and FairchildLittlefield v. Amezcua, No. 1:20-cv-00799 JLT GSA, Plaintiff goes by the name “Gigi FairchildLittlefield,” and in Fairchild-Littlefield v. Shaffer, No. 1:19-cv-00660 LJO SAB, Plaintiff goes by 

the name “Gigi Ariel Fairchild-Littlefield.” To avoid confusion and to enable to Court to 

properly track all cases filed by Plaintiff, the Clerk of Court will be ordered to add all names 

Plaintiff has used when filing pleadings in the Eastern District to the case caption in each of the 

3

 It is well-established that a court may take judicial notice of its own records. See United States 

v. Author Servs., Inc., 804 F.2d 1520, 1523 (9th Cir. 1986) overruled on other grounds, United 

States v. Jose, 131 F.3d 1325, 1328-29 (9th Cir. 1997); see, e.g., Diamond v. Pitchess, 411 F.2d 

565, 566 (9th Cir. 1969) (stating court may take judicial notice of own records to determine 

whether in forma pauperis complaint should be dismissed).

Case 1:23-cv-00917-JLT-GSA Document 13 Filed 02/06/24 Page 4 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

five matters she has filed in this Court.

V. LEAVE TO AMEND

When Plaintiff files her amended complaint, it will take the place of the original 

complaint. See Lacey v. Maricopa Cty., 693 F.3d 896, 925 (9th Cir. 2012) (amended complaint 

supersedes original). Any amended complaint should observe the following.

An amended complaint must identify as a defendant only persons who personally 

participated in a substantial way in depriving plaintiff of a federal constitutional right. Johnson 

v. Duffy, 588 F.2d 740, 743 (9th Cir. 1978) (a person subjects another to the deprivation of a 

constitutional right if he does an act, participates in another's act or omits to perform an act he is 

legally required to do that causes the alleged deprivation).

An amended complaint must also contain a caption including the names of all 

defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). Plaintiff may not change the nature of this suit by alleging 

new, unrelated claims. See George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007).

Any amended complaint must be written or typed so that it is complete in itself without 

reference to any earlier filed complaint. See L.R. 220 (E.D. Cal. 2009). This is because an 

amended complaint supersedes any earlier filed complaint, and once an amended complaint is 

filed, the earlier filed complaint no longer serves any function in the case. See Loux v. Rhay, 375 

F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967) (“The amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter being 

treated thereafter as non-existent.”), overruled on other grounds by Lacey v. Maricopa Cty., 693 

F.3d 896 (2012).

Plaintiff is advised that when amending the complaint, she must make certain it complies 

with Rules 8(a)(2) and (d)(1). To assist Plaintiff in this regard, the Clerk of Court will be 

directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the Court’s civil rights form. It is suggested that Plaintiff 

only use the space provided on the form to state her substantive claims. Plaintiff is free, 

however, to provide a reasonable number of exhibits to support those claims.

It should be noted once again that the Court is not required to review exhibits attached to 

the amended complaint when determining what Plaintiff’s claims are with respect to each 

Defendant. Indeed, Plaintiff’s claims should be clearly stated on the form itself. The Court will 

Case 1:23-cv-00917-JLT-GSA Document 13 Filed 02/06/24 Page 5 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

not review any of Plaintiff’s past supplements or pleadings in order to determine the substance 

of Plaintiff’s claims.4 In sum, when Plaintiff files her amended complaint, it should be a 

complete pleading in and unto itself. See Local Rule 220 (E.D. Cal. 2009).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to receive initial case documents (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED;

2. The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff one copy each the following:

a. The Court’s Civil Rights Complaint By a Prisoner form;

b. Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1), and

c. The Prisoner New Case Documents and Order Re: Consent (ECF No. 3);

3. The Clerk of Court shall also update the case caption in each of the following matters 

to reflect that Plaintiff is known as “Arabella Fairchild,” “Gigi Fairchild-Littlefield,” and “Gigi 

Ariel Fairchild-Littlefield”:

• Fairchild-Littlefield v. Shaffer, No. 1:19-cv-00499 DAD JDP;

• Fairchild-Littlefield v. Shaffer, No. 1:19-cv-00660 LJO SAB;

• Fairchild-Littlefield v Attinello, No. 1:19-cv-01579 JLT GSA;

• Fairchild-Littlefield v. Amezcua, No. 1:20-cv-00799 JLT GSA, and

• Fairchild v. Vang, No. 1:23-cv-00917 JLT GSA;

4. Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED, and

5. Within thirty days from the date of this order – by March 6, 2024, – Plaintiff shall file 

an amended complaint that complies with all federal and local rules.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s motion for an emergency preliminary 

injunction (ECF No. 9) be DENIED.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations – by February 20, 2024, – Plaintiff 

may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to 

4

 This includes the supplemental declaration recently filed by Plaintiff and docketed on January 

19, 2024. See ECF No. 11.

Case 1:23-cv-00917-JLT-GSA Document 13 Filed 02/06/24 Page 6 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the 

specified time may result in a waiver of the right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez v. 

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 5, 2024 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:23-cv-00917-JLT-GSA Document 13 Filed 02/06/24 Page 7 of 7