Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04128/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04128-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 1 - 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE OMNIBUS REPLY - CASE NO. C06-04128 JF

GEORGE A. RILEY (State Bar No. 118304) griley@omm.com 

DANIEL H. BOOKIN (State Bar No. 78996) dbookin@omm.com 

LUANN L. SIMMONS (State Bar No. 203526) lsimmons@omm.com 

ROBERT D. TRONNES (State Bar No. 209835) rtronnes@omm.com 

VIVI N. TRAN (State Bar No. 247513) vtran@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street 

San Francisco, California 94111-3305 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant APPLE INC. 

[See Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

In re APPLE INC. 

DERIVATIVE LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

ALL ACTIONS. 

Master File No. C-06-04128-JF 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER AUTHORIZING 

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS AND 

NOMINAL DEFENDANT APPLE 

INC. TO FILE OMNIBUS REPLY 

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND 

AMENDED SHAREHOLDER 

CONSOLIDATED DERIVATIVE 

COMPLAINT 

Date: March 21, 2008 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Department: Ctrm 3, 5th Floor 

Judge: Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

**E-filed 2/29/08**---------------

Case 5:06-cv-04128-JF Document 185 Filed 02/29/08 Page 1 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE OMNIBUS REPLY - CASE NO. C06-04128 JF

WHEREAS, on December 19, 2007, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Shareholder 

Derivative Complaint (“SAC”); and 

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2008, Nominal Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) filed a 

motion to dismiss the SAC; and 

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2008, Defendants Fred D. Anderson, William V. Campbell, 

Timothy D. Cook, Millard S. Drexler, Steven P. Jobs, Ronald B. Johnson, Arthur D. Levinson, 

Mitchell Mandich, Peter Oppenheimer, Jonathan Rubinstein, Avadis Tevanian, Jr. and Jerome B. 

York (the “Individual Defendants”) filed a separate motion to dismiss the SAC; and 

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2008, Defendant Nancy Heinen (“Heinen”) filed a separate 

motion to dismiss the SAC; and 

WHEREAS, on February 15, 2008, Plaintiffs filed an omnibus opposition to all three 

motions to dismiss; and 

WHEREAS, given the overlap of issues and in the interests of economy and efficiency, 

Apple and the Individual Defendants seek to file a single, omnibus reply in support of their two 

motions to dismiss; and 

WHEREAS, Heinen will file a separate reply in support of her motion to dismiss. 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the 

parties, through their counsel of record that, subject to Court approval, Apple and the Individual 

Defendants may file a single omnibus reply memorandum, no longer than 30 pages, in support of 

their two motions to dismiss. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February 25, 2008 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ George A. Riley 

 George A. Riley 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant APPLE INC. 

Case 5:06-cv-04128-JF Document 185 Filed 02/29/08 Page 2 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 3 - 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE OMNIBUS REPLY - CASE NO. C06-04128 JF

Dated: February 25, 2008 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP 

By: /s/ Douglas R. Young 

 Douglas R. Young 

Attorneys for Defendants WILLIAM V. CAMPBELL, 

TIMOTHY D. COOK, MILLARD S. DREXLER, 

STEVEN P. JOBS, RONALD B. JOHNSON, 

ARTHUR D. LEVINSON, MITCHELL MANDICH, 

PETER OPPENHEIMER, JONATHAN 

RUBINSTEIN, AVADIS TEVANIAN, JR., and 

JEROME B. YORK 

Dated: February 25, 2008 MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

By: /s/ Genevieve Cox 

 Genevieve Cox 

Attorneys for Defendant FRED D. ANDERSON 

Dated: February 25, 2008 HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & 

RABKIN PC 

By: /s/ Sarah A. Good 

 Sarah A. Good 

Attorneys for Defendant NANCY HEINEN 

Dated: February 25, 2008 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY 

By: /s/ Mark C. Molumphy 

 Mark C. Molumphy 

TRAVIS DOWNS 

COUGHLIN, STOIA, GELLER, RUDMAN & 

ROBBINS, LLP 

LYNN L. SARKO 

ELIZABETH A. LELAND 

KELLER ROHRBACK LLP 

ROBIN WINCHESTER 

SHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

I, George A. Riley, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Case 5:06-cv-04128-JF Document 185 Filed 02/29/08 Page 3 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 4 - 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE OMNIBUS REPLY - CASE NO. C06-04128 JF

Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Authorizing Individual Defendants And Nominal Defendant 

Apple Inc. To File Omnibus Reply Memorandum In Support Of Motions To Dismiss Second 

Amended Shareholder Consolidated Derivative Complaint. In compliance with General Order 

45, X.B., I hereby attest that Douglas Young, Genevieve Gox, Sarah Good, and Mark Molumphy 

have concurred in this filing. 

Dated: February 25, 2008 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

By: /s/ George A. Riley 

 George A. Riley 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant APPLE INC. 

Case 5:06-cv-04128-JF Document 185 Filed 02/29/08 Page 4 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 5 - 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE OMNIBUS REPLY - CASE NO. C06-04128 JF

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________________, 2008 

 HON. JEREMY FOGEL

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/29

Case 5:06-cv-04128-JF Document 185 Filed 02/29/08 Page 5 of 5