Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01931/USCOURTS-caed-1_08-cv-01931-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Orrin Carr is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant 

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On December 3, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and 

remanded the action. The Court disagreed with the grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants 

and found that Plaintiff “was not on notice that his conduct violated Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 15, § 3013, 

therefore, the prison violated [Plaintiff’s] due process rights.” (ECF No. 82, Order at 2.) The action 

was reversed and remanded for further proceedings.1 Id. 

Pursuant to the ruling by the Ninth Circuit, the Court will hereby set a briefing scheduling. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

 

1

The mandate issued January 8, 2014. (ECF No. 84.) 

ORRIN CARR,

 Plaintiff,

v.

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:08-cv-01931-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

FOLLOWING REMAND FROM THE UNITED 

STATES COURT OF COURTS FOR THE NINTH 

CIRCUIT

[ECF Nos. 82, 84]

Case 1:08-cv-01931-LJO-SAB Document 85 Filed 01/28/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Within sixty (60) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants may file any

motions related to the case, including a dispositive motion; 

2. Within thirty (30) days from the date that Defendants file a motion, Plaintiff may file an 

opposition to said motion; and

3. If no motions are filed, then the Court will be set the matter for further proceedings or an 

order will issue addressing future proceedings, including trial setting.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2015 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:08-cv-01931-LJO-SAB Document 85 Filed 01/28/15 Page 2 of 2