Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01495/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01495-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMUEL T. DANIEL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-06-1495 LKK EFB P

vs.

JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On August 30, 2006, the court ordered plaintiff to file a completed affidavit in support of

his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the appropriate filing fee within

30 days. The order warned him that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed a completed affidavit or paid

the appropriate filing fee or otherwise responded to the order.

It therefore is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

Case 2:06-cv-01495-LKK -EFB Document 10 Filed 10/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: October 17, 2006

Case 2:06-cv-01495-LKK -EFB Document 10 Filed 10/18/06 Page 2 of 2