Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_17-cv-00709/USCOURTS-ared-4_17-cv-00709-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

RANDY KEITH KING II, PLAINTIFF

ADC #151751

 CASE NO. 4:17-CV-709-KGB-BD

V.

TIM RYALS and

HENRY POINDEXTER DEFENDANTS

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

I. Procedures for Filing Objections

This Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) has been sent to Judge 

Kristine G. Baker. You may file written objections to this Recommendation. If you file 

objections, they must be specific and must include the factual or legal basis for your 

objection. Your objections must be received in the office of the United States District 

Court Clerk within fourteen (14) days of this Recommendation. 

If no objections are filed, Judge Baker can adopt this Recommendation without 

independently reviewing the record. By not objecting, you may also waive any right to 

appeal questions of fact.

II. Discussion

Randy Keith King, II, formerly an inmate at the Faulkner County Detention Center

(“Detention Center”), filed this civil rights lawsuit on October 30, 2017. (Docket entry 

#2) Mr. King is no longer incarcerated at the Detention Center, as evidenced by mail 

returned to the Court as undeliverable on November 14 and November 24, 2017. (#5, #7) 

The mail returned to the Court on November 24 contained a notation that Mr. King is “no 

Case 4:17-cv-00709-KGB Document 8 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 2
2

longer in facility.” (#7) Mr. King has failed to inform the Court of his new address as 

required by the Court’s local rules.

Mr. King was ordered to provide the Court notice of his new address within 30 

days of November 17, 2017. (#6) To date, he has failed to comply with the Court’s 

November 17, 2017 Order, and the time for doing so has passed. The Court specifically 

cautioned Mr. King that his claims could be dismissed if he failed to comply with the 

Court’s Order.

III. Conclusion

The Court recommends that Mr. King’s claims be DISMISSED, without 

prejudice, based on his failure to comply with the Court’s November 17, 2017 Order and 

failure to prosecute this case. 

DATED this 20th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:17-cv-00709-KGB Document 8 Filed 12/20/17 Page 2 of 2