Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00497/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-00497-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file objections (Doc. 44) is granted. 1

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DWAYNE B. BURNS, No. 2:09-cv-00497-MCE-CMK

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

MICHAEL MUKASEY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action alleging, among other things,

violation of the right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On November 6, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections

within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been

filed.1

///

Case 2:09-cv-00497-MCE-CMK Document 49 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file objections (Doc. 44) is granted;

2. The findings and recommendations filed November 6, 2009, are adopted in full;

3. The State Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) is granted;

4. The Local Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Docs. 23 and 26) is granted in part and

denied in part;

5. The first, second, fourth, sixth, and tenth claims are dismissed;

6. Defendants Brown, Mukasey, Sullivan, Mueller, City of Redding, Hansen, and

Bosenko are dismissed; and

7. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s third, fifth, seventh, eighth, and ninth claims as

against defendants Kimple, Forrest, Williams, and Zufall only. 

Dated: February 11, 2010

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:09-cv-00497-MCE-CMK Document 49 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 2