Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-01123/USCOURTS-caed-2_00-cv-01123-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN PERRIDON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-00-1123 LKK JFM P

vs.

ERNIE ROE, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 3, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Neither party has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:00-cv-01123-LKK -JFM Document 34 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 3, 2005, are adopted in full; 

2. Petitioner’s May 9, 2005 motion to stay is granted;

3. This action is stayed pending exhaustion of state remedies as to petitioner’s

Batson claim and petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel;

4. Petitioner shall filed a motion to lift the stay within thirty days from the date of

any order by the California Supreme Court resolving the claims referred to in paragraph 3 of this

order; 

5. Respondents’ May 18, 2005 motion for summary judgment is denied without

prejudice; and

6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administrative close this case.

DATED: July 11, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/perr1123.801

Case 2:00-cv-01123-LKK -JFM Document 34 Filed 07/12/05 Page 2 of 2