Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04675/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04675-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

UNIFToEr thD Se NTATE orthS erDn DISTRistricICt oT f CCOURT alifornia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNIFToEr thD Se NTATE orthS erDn DISTRistricICt oT f CCOURT alifornia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEMICONDUCTOR ENERGY

LABORATORY CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORP., et

al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 04-04675 MHP

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Re: Plaintiff’s Motion to Enlarge Time

On December 5, 2006, plaintiff “reluctantly” filed a Motion to Enlarge Time pursuant to

Civil L.R. 6-3 based on the parties’ inability to reach an agreement regarding the deadline for

plaintiff’s response to defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Without reaching the merits of

plaintiff’s argument, the court reluctantly DENIES plaintiff’s motion on the grounds that the parties

should be able to work out a briefing schedule among themselves without the court’s assistance.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

_______________________________

MARILYN HALL PATEL

United States District Judge

Northern District of California

Case 3:04-cv-04675-MHP Document 228 Filed 12/13/06 Page 1 of 1