Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03986/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03986-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT / CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03986-JCS 

DURIE TANGRI LLP 

MICHAEL H. PAGE (SBN 154913) 

mpage@durietangri.com 

SONALI D. MAITRA (SBN 254896) 

smaitra@durietangri.com 

217 Leidesdorff Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 415-362-6666 

Facsimile: 415-236-6300 

Attorneys for Defendants 

GOOGLE INC. and WAZE, INC. 

KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP 

KARL S. KRONENBERGER (SBN 226112) 

karl@KRInternetlaw.com 

JEFFREY M. ROSENFELD (SBN 222187) 

Jeff@KRInternetlaw.com 

ANSEL J. HALLIBURTON (SBN 282906) 

ansel@krinternetlaw.com 

150 Post Street, Suite 520 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Telephone: 415-955-1155 

Facsimile: 415-955-1158 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PhantomALERT, Inc. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

PHANTOMALERT, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, 

WAZE, INC., a Delaware corporation, and 

DOES 1–10, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:15-cv-03986-JCS 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Ctrm: G – 15th Floor 

Judge: Honorable Joseph C. Spero 

Case 3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document 18 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT / CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03986-JCS 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendants Google Inc. and Waze, Inc. (collectively 

“Defendants”) hereby submit the following stipulation between the parties in this action extending the 

time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff PhantomALERT, Inc.’s Complaint for Damages and 

Equitable and Other Relief (“Complaint”): 

WHEREAS, the Parties have mutually agreed to a thirty (30) day extension of time for 

Defendants to file a response to the Complaint; and 

WHEREAS, this extension of time will not alter any event or deadline already fixed by Court 

order. 

THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed through counsel that the time in which 

Defendants may respond to the Complaint is extended for thirty (30) days. Defendants shall file their 

response to the Complaint on or before October 26, 2015. 

Dated: September 16, 2015 

By:

DURIE TANGRI LLP 

/s/ Michael H. Page

 MICHAEL H. PAGE 

Attorneys for Defendants 

GOOGLE INC. and WAZE, INC. 

Dated: September 16, 2015 

By:

KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP 

/s/ Karl S. Kronenberger

 KARL S. KRONENBERGER 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

PHANTOMALERT, INC. 

FILER’S ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Michael H. Page, attest that concurrence 

in the filing of this document has been obtained. 

Dated: September 16, 2015 /s/ Michael H. Page

 MICHAEL H. PAGE

Case 3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document 18 Filed 09/18/15 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT / CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03986-JCS 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on September 16, 2015 the within document was filed with the Clerk of the 

Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to the attorneys of record in this case. 

/s/ Michael H. Page 

MICHAEL H. PAGE 

Dated: 9/18/15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/ Joseph C. Spero 

Chief Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-03986-JCS Document 18 Filed 09/18/15 Page 3 of 3