Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00420/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00420-37/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BEATRIZ ALDAPA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FOWLER PACKING COMPANY INC., et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00420-DAD-SAB

SIXTH AMENDED PHASE TWO 

SCHEDULING ORDER

(ECF No. 237)

On March 1, 2018, a Phase Two Scheduling Order issued in this action. (ECF No. 193.) 

At the stipulation of the parties, the Phase Two Scheduling Order was amended on September 

17, 2018; February 12, 2019; June 28, 2019; September 13, 2019; and November 25, 2019. 

(ECF No. 200, 206, 221, 223, 229.) On March 17, 2020, the parties submitted a stipulation to 

amend the Phase Two Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 237.)

The Court finds good cause to amend the scheduling order due to the ongoing issues with 

fact discovery. However, the parties are reminded that the scheduling order states, 

The parties are cautioned that the discovery/expert cut-off deadlines are the dates 

by which all discovery must be completed. Absent good cause, discovery motions 

will not be heard after the discovery deadlines. Moreover, absent good cause, the 

Court will only grant relief on a discovery motion if the relief requested requires 

the parties to act before the expiration of the relevant discovery deadline. In other 

words, discovery requests and deposition notices must be served sufficiently in 

advance of the discovery deadlines to permit time for a response, time to meet and 

Case 1:15-cv-00420-ADA-SAB Document 238 Filed 03/19/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

confer, time to prepare, file and hear a motion to compel and time to obtain relief 

on a motion to compel. . . . Compliance with these discovery cutoffs requires 

motions to compel be filed and heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery 

cutoff so that the Court may grant effective relief within the allotted discovery 

time.

(ECF No. 193 at 3 (emphasis in original).) Further, the current dispositive motion deadline 

cannot be moved without impacting the pretrial and trial dates set in this matter. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the March 1, 2018 Phase Two Scheduling 

Order as amended on September 17, 2018; February 12, 2019; June 28, 2019; September 13, 

2019; and November 25, 2019 is AMENDED as follows:

1. Non-Expert Discovery Deadline: July 24, 2020;

2. Expert Disclosure Deadline: August 25, 2020;

3. Supplemental Expert Disclosure Deadline: September 24, 2020;

4. Expert Discovery Deadline: October 23, 2020;

5. All other aspects of the March 1, 2018 Phase Two Scheduling Order shall remain 

in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2020 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00420-ADA-SAB Document 238 Filed 03/19/20 Page 2 of 2