Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00080/USCOURTS-caed-1_16-cv-00080-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone: (408) 298-2000

Facsimile: (408) 298-6046

Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Jose Trujillo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE TRUJILLO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:16-cv-00080-BAM

STIPULATION TO AMEND 

SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED]

ORDER

Plaintiff, Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc. 

(“Defendant,” and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), together request that the Court amend 

the Scheduling Order as follows:

WHEREAS, on April 11, 2016, Plaintiff noticed a site inspection of the subject Kohl’s 

#701 (“the Facility”) to take place on May 25, 2016; 

WHEREAS, on May 4, 2016, the Court issued a Scheduling Order (Dkt. 13) 

(“Scheduling Order”), which sets a deadline to amend the pleadings of August 1, 2016;

WHEREAS, prior to Plaintiff’s May 25, 2016 noticed inspection, the Parties were 

engaging in settlement discussions and appeared to be very close to reaching a settlement, and 

thus Plaintiff agreed to continue his site inspection to allow time to finalize the settlement; 

Case 1:16-cv-00080-BAM Document 15 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel believed that the Parties had reached a full settlement 

on or about May 31, 2016, and provided Plaintiff’s signature on the settlement agreement to 

defense counsel; however, Defendant requested further changes to the settlement agreement, 

which changes Plaintiff could not agree to;

WHEREAS, on June 20, 2016, Plaintiff served an amended demand for inspection 

noticing his continued site inspection for August 1, 2016;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff contends he is unable to amend his complaint to include

additional barriers to his full and equal access which may exist at the Facility, as Plaintiff 

asserts is urged and required by the Ninth Circuit (Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc., 631 

F.3d 939, 944 (9th Cir. 2011); Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903, 909 (9th Cir. 

2011)), until his consultant can inspect the Facility and provide his findings to Plaintiff;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE 

COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE to amend the Scheduling Order as 

follows:

Event Current Date New Date

Deadline to amend pleadings August 1, 2016 October 3, 2016

Non-expert discovery cutoff November 1, 2016 February 8, 2017

Expert discovery cutoff February 15, 2017 April 11, 2017

Expert disclosures November 15, 2016 February 22, 2017

Rebuttal expert disclosures November 29, 2016 March 7, 2017

Motion filing deadline (nondispositive and dispositive)May 1, 2017 unchanged

All other requirements set forth in the Scheduling Order relating to the above shall 

remain unchanged, including the pre-trial and trial dates.

//

//

//

Case 1:16-cv-00080-BAM Document 15 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 27, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Jose Trujillo

Dated: July 27, 2016 CALL & JENSEN

A Professional Corporation

/s/ Matthew R. Orr

Matthew R. Orr

Michael S. Orr

Attorneys for Defendant,

Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00080-BAM Document 15 Filed 07/28/16 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Order issued March 24, 2015 (Dkt. 20) 

is hereby amended as follows:

Event Current Date New Date

Deadline to amend pleadings August 1, 2016 October 3, 2016

Non-expert discovery cutoff November 1, 2016 February 8, 2017

Expert discovery cutoff February 15, 2017 April 11, 2017

Expert disclosures November 15, 2016 February 22, 2017

Rebuttal expert disclosures November 29, 2016 March 7, 2017

Motion filing deadline (nondispositive and dispositive)May 1, 2017 May 23, 2017

All other requirements set forth in the Scheduling Order relating to the above shall 

remain unchanged, including the pre-trial and trial dates.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 1:16-cv-00080-BAM Document 15 Filed 07/28/16 Page 4 of 4