Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02249/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02249-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

{01557913.DOCX} 1

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND MODIFY THE 

SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, CA 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

David P.E. Burkett, SBN 241896

Ariana A. Van Alstine, SBN 296624

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

Attorneys for Defendant

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 

Exempt From Filing Fees Pursuant to Government Code § 6103

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLET INTHAVONGXAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO ET AL.,

Defendants

___________________________________/

CASE NO.: 2:13-cv-02249-WBS-KJN (TEMP)

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND 

MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

Complaint Filed: October 28, 2013

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff CHARLET INTHAVONGXAY and 

Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO (“The Parties”). The Parties enter into the stipulation 

and proposed order in compliance with the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) and the 

requirements of the current scheduling order. The Parties have conferred and agree to request to 

continue the trial date from October 25, 2016 to January 3, 2017, and request that the scheduling 

order be adjusted accordingly.

As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), the Parties have good cause to request 

a trial continuance. This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff CHARLET 

INTHAVONGXAY and Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. The Parties have conferred 

and agree to extend all dates in this case, and to continue the trial as follows:

The Parties stipulate and propose a new trial date of January 3, 2017. The remaining dates 

Case 2:13-cv-02249-WBS-DB Document 48 Filed 06/03/16 Page 1 of 3
{01557913.DOCX} 2

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND MODIFY THE 

SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, CA 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

on the current schedule will likewise need to be amended. The Parties agree and propose the 

following scheduling amendments based on the proposed new trial date:

Last day to complete discovery: August 3, 2016

Last day to notice Motions to Compel: August 3, 2016

Last day for all motions except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or

other emergency applications to be filed and heard: September 10, 2016

Separate Statements: October 11, 2016

Joint Pre-Trial Statement: October 18, 2016

Pre-Trial Conference Date: November 14, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

Trial Date: January 3, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.

The parties have good cause to request an extension. Counsel for Defendants, David 

Burkett, is scheduled for trial on another matter on November 1, 2016. The trial schedules conflict. 

The parties request a brief continuance so that Counsel for Defendant may be afforded the 

opportunity to defend this matter. Likewise, Plaintiff’s counsel is scheduled for trial in early 

December. Accordingly, the continuance is request to the January 3, 2017. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: June 2, 2016 RUSSELL A. ROBINSON

By /s/ Russell A. Robinson (authorized on 6/2/16) 

Russell A. Robinson

Attorney for Plaintiff

CHARLET INTHAVONGXAY

Dated: June 2, 2016 PORTER SCOTT

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

By /s/ Ariana A. Van Alstine______________

David P.E. Burkett

Ariana A. Van Alstine

Attorneys for Defendant

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Case 2:13-cv-02249-WBS-DB Document 48 Filed 06/03/16 Page 2 of 3
{01557913.DOCX} 3

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND MODIFY THE 

SCHEDULING ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, CA 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties and good cause having been established, the scheduled 

dates are amended as follows:

Last day to complete discovery: August 3, 2016

Last day to notice Motions to Compel: August 3, 2016

Last day for all motions except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or 

other emergency applications to be filed: September 12, 2016

Separate Statements: October 11, 2016

Joint Pre-Trial Statement: October 18, 2016

Pre-Trial Conference Date: November 21, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.

Trial Date: January 4, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Counsel are admonished as follows. This case was set for trial to begin on 

October 24, 2016 at the request of the very attorney who now says he has a conflict on that 

date. If that conflict existed at the time he submitted the request, counsel should not have made the 

request. If the conflict arose when some other court later set a trial for the same time period, 

counsel had a duty to inform that court of the conflict. If he did, this court would like to know 

which judge set the trial in that case, when it was set, and exactly what counsel informed that judge. 

No further continuances will be granted without some explanation much more acceptable than the 

one tendered now.

Dated: June 2, 2016

Case 2:13-cv-02249-WBS-DB Document 48 Filed 06/03/16 Page 3 of 3