Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00514/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00514-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN M. PALMER,

Plaintiff, CV F 07 0514 LJO WMW P 

vs. FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION

C/O CROTTY, et al.,

Defendants.

On June 26, 2007, findings and recommendations were entered,

recommending dismissal of this action for Plaintiff’s failure to file a completed application

to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations. 

In his objections, Plaintiff indicates that he originally filed this action as CV

F 07 0148 LJO DLB P. Plaintiff did not intend to proceed in a separate action. A review of

both actions reveals that the cases are identical. The court will therefore vacate the

recommendation of dismissal for failure to obey a court order, and recommend dismissal

without prejudice as duplicative. Plaintiff will not be assessed a filing fee in this action. 

Plaintiff is cautioned that if he desires to proceed in this later action, he will be assessed a

filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

Case 1:07-cv-00514-LJO-WMW Document 9 Filed 07/27/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

dismissed without prejudice as duplicative.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See

Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9 Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the th

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2007 /s/ William M. Wunderlich 

mmkd34 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-00514-LJO-WMW Document 9 Filed 07/27/07 Page 2 of 2