Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caDC-19-05309/USCOURTS-caDC-19-05309-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 

---

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 19-5309 September Term, 2019

1:19-cv-02502-UNA

Filed On: March 17, 2020

Grant Anderson, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

United States of America,

Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Tatel and Pillard, Circuit Judges; Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed.

R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s October 8, 2019 order

denying without prejudice appellant’s petition for writ of error coram nobis be affirmed. 

The district court correctly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider appellant’s

petition, which challenges a judgment of conviction entered by the D.C. Superior Court. 

See United States v. Denedo, 556 U.S. 904, 913 (2009) (explaining that, to grant a writ

of error coram nobis, a court “must have had statutory subject-matter jurisdiction over

[the] original judgment of conviction”).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

USCA Case #19-5309 Document #1833860 Filed: 03/17/2020 Page 1 of 1