Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00767/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00767-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON DANIEL MATNEY, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

)

v. )

)

FRESNO HEAT TASK FORCE, et )

al., ) 

 )

Defendants. )

)

 )

1: 05-CV-00767-AWI-SMS

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(Doc. 10)

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with an action for damages

and other relief concerning alleged civil rights violations. The

matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304.

On December 5, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and

a recommendation that the action be dismissed for Plaintiff’s

failure to effectuate service of this action, respond to an order

to show cause, or otherwise prosecute the case. The findings and

recommendation were served on all parties and contained notice

that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to

be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the

Case 1:05-cv-00767-AWI -SMS Document 12 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

order. No party has filed any objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d

452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court has conducted a de novo

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the Court finds that the report and recommendation are supported

by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendation filed December 5, 2005,

are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The action IS DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to

prosecute; and

3. The Clerk of Court IS DIRECTED to close this action

because this order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 18, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00767-AWI -SMS Document 12 Filed 01/20/06 Page 2 of 2