Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-06930/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-06930-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT

SCHEDULE - 17-CV-06930-RS 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON &

SUTCLIFFE LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

L. SCOTT OLIVER (STATE BAR NO. 174824)

soliver@orrick.com 

LILLIAN J. MAO (STATE BAR NO. 267410) 

lmao@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015 

Telephone: +1 650 614 7400 

Facsimile: +1 650 614 7401 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Vendavo, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

VENDAVO, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PRICE F(X) AG, PRICE F(X), INC., and 

DOES 1-10, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 17-cv-06930-RS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO MODIFY CASE 

MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE 

Case 3:17-cv-06930-RS Document 96 Filed 11/09/18 Page 1 of 3
- 1 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT

SCHEDULE - 17-CV-06930-RS 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON &

SUTCLIFFE LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Plaintiff Vendavo, Inc. (“Vendavo”) and defendants Price f(x), Inc. and Price f(x) AG 

(together, “PFX”) hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court modify the Markman

Scheduling Order under the Patent Local Rules as follows. The Parties believe that the claim 

construction portion of this case would be made dramatically more efficient if the Parties are 

granted time to mutually supplement their infringement and invalidity contentions so as to 

provide one another with greater detail in their respective contentions. The software products at 

issue are complex, and the Parties’ agreement to supplement their contentions will avoid 

protracted motion practice about the adequacy of their respective contentions. 

Therefore, the Parties agree that the following schedule would enable Vendavo to provide 

more detailed infringement contentions, and PFX to provide more detailed invalidity contentions. 

Because a trial date has not yet been set, this change in the Markman process would not have an 

impact on other dates in the case. 

In light of the time that the Parties will need to prepare such amended contentions, and to 

analyze one another’s contentions before entering into the claim construction process, the Parties 

respectfully request that the Court amend the existing schedule as follows: 

Event Deadline 

Plaintiff to serve patent infringement contentions pursuant to Patent 

L.R. 3-1 and 3-2

1/10/2019 

Defendant to serve patent invalidity contentions pursuant to Patent 

L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 

2/21/2019 

Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction pursuant to Patent 

L.R. 4-1 

3/7/2019 

Exchange of Preliminary Claim Construction and Extrinsic 

Evidence pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-2 

3/21/2019 

Plaintiff to serve damages contentions pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-8 3/28/2019 

Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement due pursuant to 

Patent L.R. 4-3 

4/11/2019 

Defendants to serve responsive damages contentions pursuant to 

Patent L.R. 3-9 

4/18/2019 

Case 3:17-cv-06930-RS Document 96 Filed 11/09/18 Page 2 of 3
- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT

SCHEDULE - 17-CV-06930-RS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON &

SUTCLIFFE LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

Date to Complete Claim Construction Discovery pursuant to Patent 

L.R. 4-4 

5/2/2019 

Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief due 5/9/2019 

Defendants’ Responsive Claim Construction Brief due 5/30/2019 

Plaintiff’s Reply Claim Construction Brief due 6/20/2019 

Markman Hearing 7/18/2019 

Dated: November 8, 2018 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

By: /s/ L. Scott Oliver 

L. Scott Oliver 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Vendavo, Inc. 

Dated: November 8, 2018 SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP

By: /s/ Matt Kerkowitz

Matt Berkowitz 

Attorneys for Defendant Price f(x) AG, and 

Price f(x), Inc. 

Filer’s Attestation: I, L. Scott Oliver, am the ECF User whose User ID and password are 

being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that I 

have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the above-listed signatories. 

By: /s/ L. Scott Oliver 

L. Scott Oliver 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November __, 2018 By: 

United States District Judge 

4145-3031-9384 

9

7/19/2019

Case 3:17-cv-06930-RS Document 96 Filed 11/09/18 Page 3 of 3