Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01538/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01538-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

J.P., Minor, by her Guardian ad Litem

RICARDO BLADERAS, et al.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF PORTERVILLE, et al.,

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01538-AWI-SKO

ORDER DENYING STIPULATED

REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF

SCHEDULING ORDER

On July 16, 2010, the parties filed a stipulation requesting that all deadlines set forth in the

December 23, 2009, Scheduling Order be extended. In the December 23, 2009, Scheduling Order,

the parties were explicitly instructed as follows:

Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless

they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached

exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief requested. 

In the parties' stipulated request, they provide no statement of good cause or even a reason

why all the deadlines applicable to all discovery and motions should be extended. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties' request for an extension of all

scheduling deadlines is DENIED. The parties may resubmit a request that sets forth good cause for

the desired extensions for the Court's consideration. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 16, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

ie14hj UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

Case 1:09-cv-01538-AWI-SKO Document 20 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 1