Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03516/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-03516-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

---

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BRIAN J. STRETCH 

United States Attorney 

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL 

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

Social Security Administration 

JENNIFER LEE TARN CSBN 240609 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

Social Security Administration 

1600 Spear Street, Suite 800 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 977-8825 

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 

E-mail: Jennifer.Tarn@ssa.gov 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND 

ALBERTO JACINTO, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner, 

Social Security Administration, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 4:15-cv-03516-DMR 

STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY 

REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE 

FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO 

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 

IT IS STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Alberto Jacinto (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant 

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, through their counsel of record, that this 

action be remanded for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security 

Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), sentence four. 

On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for 

a new decision. The Appeals Council will instruct the ALJ to reevaluate the opinion evidence, 

Case 4:15-cv-03516-DMR Document 20 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 2 Case 4:15-cv-03516-DMR Document 21 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity, Plaintiff’s ability to return to his past relevant work, or perform 

other work in the national economy, and if warranted, obtain supplemental vocational evidence. The 

parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment in favor of 

Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner and remanding for 

further proceedings. 

DATE: April 19, 2016 BRIAN J. STRETCH 

United States Attorney 

 DEBORAH LEE STACHEL 

 Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

 Social Security Administration 

By: /s/ Jennifer Lee Tarn 

JENNIFER LEE TARN 

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DATE: April 21, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF GERI N. KAHN 

By: /s/ Geri Nadine Kahn* 

 GERI NADINE KAHN 

 * as authorized by email on April 21, 2016

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ORDER

BASED UPON THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO 

SENTENCE 4 OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(G) AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (“STIPULATION FOR 

REMAND”), AND FOR CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED 

ACTION IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY FOR FURTHER 

PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS OF THE STIPULATION FOR REMAND. 

Dated: _______________________ _________________________________ 

 HON. DONNA M. RYU 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 4:15-cv-03516-DMR Document 20 Filed 04/25/16 Page 2 of 2

April 25, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:15-cv-03516-DMR Document 21 Filed 04/25/16 Page 2 of 2