Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01622/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-01622-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OPENTV, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

APPLE, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-01622-JST 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE

Re: ECF No. 99

The Court has received the parties’ Stipulation Requesting Teleconference Regarding 

Claim Construction Briefs. ECF No. 99. The parties seek the Court’s guidance regarding how 

many claim terms the parties are permitted to dispute in their claim construction briefing. The 

Court will limit the parties’ claim construction to a maximum of ten terms pursuant to Patent 

Local Rule 4-2. The parties should observe standard page limitations. 

The Court denies the request for a telephonic conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 4:14-cv-01622-HSG Document 103 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 1