Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00573/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-00573-16/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-02-0573 FCD EFB P

vs.

MICHAEL CRY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 20, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff filed objections

to the findings and recommendations on September 10, 2007. Defendants filed a reply to

plaintiff’s objections on September 20, 2007.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

Case 2:02-cv-00573-FCD-KJN Document 189 Filed 09/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 20, 2007, are adopted in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s April 21, 2006, motion for partial summary judgment is denied;

3. Defendants’ June 13, 2006, motion for summary judgment is granted;

4. Plaintiff’s pendent state court claim is dismissed;

5. Defendants’ October 17, 2006, amended motion for summary judgment is

denied as untimely filed;

6. Summary judgment is entered for defendants Cry, Ramirez-Palmer, and

Valadez for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and on the basis of res

judicata; and

7. This action is dismissed.

DATED: September 24, 2007.

Case 2:02-cv-00573-FCD-KJN Document 189 Filed 09/25/07 Page 2 of 2