Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06427/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06427-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Entrust Administration, Inc., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

Thomas Davise, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

NO. C 06-06427 JW 

JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT

INJUNCTION

Pursuant to the Court’s March 28, 2007 Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Application for Default

Judgment Against Defendants Thomas Davise and EtrustDirect, Inc., judgment is entered in favor of

Plaintiffs Entrust Administration, Inc. and Entrust Group, Inc., against Defendants Thomas Davise

and eTrustDirect, Inc. 

Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of $57,949.46 for fees and costs. In

addition, Defendants Thomas Davise and eTrustDirect, Inc. are permanently enjoined from the

following:

(a) Disseminating any advertising, solicitations, or communications with customers or

prospective customers in which Defendants make false or misleading statements

about themselves or about Entrust, including but not limited to, statements (i) that

Entrust pays less than 0.01% interest on customer accounts, and (ii) that Defendants

have a custodial relationship with Greater Bay Bank, N.A.;

Case 5:06-cv-06427-JW Document 32 Filed 03/29/07 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

(b) Making any use whatsoever, direct or indirect, of Entrust’s Trade Secrets (including

without limitation customer information and Administrative Forms) currently in the

possession, custody, or control of Defendants;

(c) Passing or otherwise disclosing in any way Entrust’s Trade Secrets (including

without limitation customer information and Administrative Forms) to any third

party;

(d) Using Entrust’s Trade Secrets (including without limitation customer information and

Administrative Forms) to solicit any of Entrust’s customers; and

(e) Entering into any agreement with any customer whose identity became known to

Defendants as a result of confidential information belonging to Entrust.

Dated: March 28, 2007 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:06-cv-06427-JW Document 32 Filed 03/29/07 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Christopher L. Wanger cwanger@manatt.com

Christopher Robin Lucas crl@goforthlucas.com

John P. Kern jkern@manatt.com

Perry J. Narancic perry@lexanalytica.com

Ryan S. Hilbert rhilbert@manatt.com

Dated: March 28, 2007 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: /s/ JW Chambers 

Elizabeth Garcia

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:06-cv-06427-JW Document 32 Filed 03/29/07 Page 3 of 3