Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02852/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-02852-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Case No. C 07 2852 MJJ

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP

LEE H. RUBIN (SBN 141331)

SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 205584)

Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300

Palo Alto, CA 94306

Telephone: (650) 331-2000

Facsimile: (650) 331-2060

lrubin@mayerbrownrowe.com

sgupta@mayerbrownrowe.com

Attorneys for Defendant TD Ameritrade, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA—SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MATTHEW ELVEY, an individual, and

GADGETWIZ, INC., an Arizona

corporation, on their own behalf and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs

v.

TD AMERITRADE, INC., a New York

corporation, and DOES 1 to 100,

Defendants.

Case No. C 07 2852 MJJ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RESETTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Judge: Martin J. Jenkins

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Matthew Elvey and Gadgetwiz.com filed a First Amended

Complaint against Defendant TD Ameritrade, Inc. (“TD AMERITRADE”), on June 28, 2007,

and Motion For Preliminary Injunction on July 10, 2007;

WHEREAS, TD AMERITRADE field a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint

on July 18, 2007;

Case 3:07-cv-02852-MJJ Document 15 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 3 Case 4:07-cv-02852-SBA Document 16 Filed 07/26/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING MOTION TO DISMISS

AND MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CASE NO. C 07 2852 MJJ

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-2, the hearing for Plaintiffs’ Motion for

Preliminary Injunction is currently set for August 14, 2007, and the hearing for TD

AMERITRADE’s Motion to Dismiss is currently set for August 28, 2007;

WHEREAS, on June 29, 2007, the Court ordered a case management conference to be

held at 2:00 p.m. on September 18, 2007;

WHEREAS, TD AMERITRADE’s counsel has a scheduling conflict with the current

hearing date of August 14, 2007 for the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Plaintiffs’ counsel

has a scheduling conflict with the current hearing date of August 28, 2007 for the Motion to

Dismiss;

WHEREAS, the Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Preliminary Injunction raise common

issues of law such that it will likely be more efficient for the Court to consolidate the hearing

dates for the two motions;

WHEREAS, it would be efficient for the parties, and may be more efficient for the Court,

to align the hearing dates for the pending motions with the current date for the case management

conference, September 18, 2007;

WHEREAS, the proposed schedule set forth in this stipulation will not postpone any

deadline set by the Court and serves judicial economy;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, that pursuant to Civil Local

Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and TD AMERITRADE’S Motion to

Dismiss shall both be set for September 18, 2007;

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that TD AMERITRADE will file its Opposition to the

Motion for Preliminary Injunction no later than August 23, 2007, and that Plaintiffs will file their

Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss no later than August 27, 2007. The parties shall file their

respective reply briefs no later than September 4, 2007.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that this stipulation shall not be construed to reflect the

position of any of the parties concerning the urgency or absence of any urgency of the relief

sought in the Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

Case 3:07-cv-02852-MJJ Document 15 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 2 of 3 Case 4:07-cv-02852-SBA Document 16 Filed 07/26/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING MOTION TO DISMISS

AND MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CASE NO. C 07 2852 MJJ

Dated: July 20, 2007

By: /s/ Alan Himmelfarb

LAW OFFICES OF ALAN HIMMELFARB

Alan Himmelfarb

2757 Leonis Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90058

Telephone: (323) 585-8696

Fax: (323) 585-8198

Consumerlaw1@earthlink.net

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: July 20, 2007 By: /s/ Lee H. Rubin

MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP

Lee H. Rubin

Attorneys for Defendant TD AMERITRADE

E-Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B), Lee H. Rubin hereby

attests that the signatory’s concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

[Proposed] Order

Pursuant to Stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ ______________________________

Martin J. Jenkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:07-cv-02852-MJJ Document 15 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 3 of 3 Case 4:07-cv-02852-SBA Document 16 Filed 07/26/07 Page 3 of 3