Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20451/USCOURTS-cand-5_98-cv-20451-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Property Damage

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING ON ASYST’S MOTION

FOR REVIEW OF COSTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 98-20451 JF

 

DARRYL M. WOO (CSB No. 100513) 

E-Mail: dwoo@fenwick.com

MICHAEL J. SACKSTEDER (CSB No.191605) 

E-Mail: msacksteder@fenwick.com

DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB No. 223936) 

E-Mail: dschumann@fenwick.com

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

JOSEPH S. BELICHICK (CSB No. 229371) 

E-Mail: jbelichick@fenwick.com

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center, 801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Plaintiff–Appellant 

Asyst Technologies, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EMPAK, INC.,; EMTRAK, INC.; JENOPTIK 

AG; JENOPTIK INFAB, INC.; and 

MEISSNER + WURST GmbH,, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 98-20451 JF 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

THE HEARING DATE ON ASYST

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S

MOTION FOR REVIEW OF THE

CLERK’S TAXATION OF COSTS

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Date: April 25, 2008 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 3 

Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

------------------------

Case 5:98-cv-20451-JF Document 1139 Filed 04/07/08 Page 1 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26

STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING ON ASYST’S

MOTION FOR REVIEW OF COSTS AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 98-20451 JF

2 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the hearing on Asyst Technologies, 

Inc.’s Motion for Review of the Clerk’s Taxation of Costs now set for April 25, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. 

be continued on the Court’s calendar to June 20, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, before the 

Honorable Jeremy Fogel. Good cause exists for this continuation due to a conflict with briefing 

and hearings in other matters. Additionally, this continuation will not affect the satisfaction of 

costs because the Court stayed costs pending the outcome of the appeal of the Court’s Judgment, 

for which a hearing has not yet been scheduled. 

DATED: April 3, 2008 FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By: /s/ David D. Schumann

David D. Schumann 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

By: /s/ Daniel T. Shvodian

Daniel T. Shvodian 

HOWREY LLP 

1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor 

East Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Email: ShvodianD@howrey.com 

Attorneys for Defendants JENOPTIK AG, 

JENOPTIK INFAB, INC., 

And EMTRAK, INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________, 2008 ___________________________________ 

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

United States District Judge 

4/4

Case 5:98-cv-20451-JF Document 1139 Filed 04/07/08 Page 2 of 3
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26

STIP TO CONTINUE HEARING ON ASYST’S

MOTION FOR REVIEW OF COSTS AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 98-20451 JF

3 

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

I, David Schumann, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from Daniel T. Shvodian, counsel for Jenoptik et al. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 3rd 

day of April, 2008 in San Francisco, California. 

/s/ David D. Schumann 

 David D. Schumann 

Case 5:98-cv-20451-JF Document 1139 Filed 04/07/08 Page 3 of 3