Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03580/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03580-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 

CASE NO.: C-04-3580-MJJ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838 

LEO P. CUNNINGHAM, State Bar No. 121605 

MEREDITH E. KOTLER, (admitted pro hac vice)

MARK T. OAKES, State Bar No. 234598, moakes@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Defendants 

SYNOPSYS, INC., AART DE GEUS, 

STEVEN K. SHEVICK, and 

VICKI ANDREWS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

THE WU GROUP, et al., 

Plaintiff, 

v.

SYNOPSYS, INC., AART DE GEUS, STEVEN 

K. SHEVICK, and RICHARD T. ROWLEY, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C-04-3580-MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND ENTRY OF 

FINAL JUDGMENT 

Case 3:04-cv-03580-MJJ Document 71-1 Filed 08/31/2005 Page 1 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 

CASE NO.: C-04-3580-MJJ

 -2- 2715831_1.DOC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, on January 24, 2005, plaintiffs Yeushyr Wu, Robert Wiederhold, Hosein 

Naaseh-Sahry, and Thomas Ratcliffe, individually and on behalf of the Sara Eastwood Family 

Trust (collectively the “Lead Plaintiff”), filed their Consolidated Amended Class Action 

Complaint (the “Consolidated Complaint”) in the above-titled action; and 

WHEREAS, on March 25, 2005, defendants Synopsys, Inc., Aart J. de Geus, Steven K. 

Shevick, and Vicki L. Andrews (collectively “Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss the 

Consolidated Complaint and also filed a motion for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure; and 

WHEREAS, on August 10, 2005, the Court entered an order granting Defendants’ 

motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint without prejudice and denying Defendants’ 

motion for sanctions; and 

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed to dismissal with prejudice in 

this action provided that each party bear his, her or its own costs and fees incurred in this action. 

NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and 

through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate to the following: 

1. The Consolidated Complaint, and all claims contained therein, shall be dismissed 

with prejudice. 

2. Each party shall bear his, her or its own fees and costs. 

3. Final Judgment shall be entered in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: August 31, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Leo P. Cunningham 

 Leo P. Cunningham 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Tel (650) 493-9300 

Fax (650) 565-5100 

Counsel for Defendants Synopsys, Inc., Aart de 

Geus, Steven K. Shevick, and Vicki L. 

Andrews

Case 3:04-cv-03580-MJJ Document 71-1 Filed 08/31/2005 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 

CASE NO.: C-04-3580-MJJ

 -3- 2715831_1.DOC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: August 31, 2005 SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP 

By: /s/ Michael K. Yarnoff 

 Michael K. Yarnoff 

280 King of Prussia Road 

 Radnor, PA 19087 

 Telephone: (610) 667-7706 

 Facsimile: (610) 667-7056 

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the 

Proposed Class 

GREEN WELLING LLP 

595 Market Street, Suite 2750 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 477-6700

Facsimile: (415) 477-6710 

Robert S. Green

Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the 

Proposed Class 

* * * * 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

 Based upon the parties’ stipulation for dismissal with prejudice and entry of final 

judgment, and good cause therefore appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

 1. The Consolidated Complaint, and all claims contained therein, are dismissed with 

prejudice. 

 2. Each party shall bear his, her or its own fees and costs. 

 3. Final Judgment shall be entered in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

Dated: The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:04-cv-03580-MJJ Document 71-1 Filed 08/31/2005 Page 3 of 4

9/6/2005
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 

CASE NO.: C-04-3580-MJJ

 -4- 2715831_1.DOC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 

I, Mark T. Oakes, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file this document. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that concurrence in 

the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 

Dated: August 31, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Mark T. Oakes 

 Mark T. Oakes 

Case 3:04-cv-03580-MJJ Document 71-1 Filed 08/31/2005 Page 4 of 4