Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01198/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01198-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Andre Ross, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney

General; Dora B. Schriro, Director,

Arizona Department of Corrections, 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-04-1198-PHX-DGC (DKD)

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Petitioner Michael Andre Ross’ petition for writ of

habeas corpus and United States Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan’s Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”). Docs. ##1, 18. The R&R recommends that the Court deny the

petition. Doc. #18 at7. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had ten days to

file objections to the R&R and that the failure to timely file objections to any determination

of the Magistrate Judge would be considered a waiver of the right to review of such

determination. Id. at 7 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d

1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).

Following issuance of the R&R, Petitioner filed a Motion to Supplement. Doc. #20.

The motion contained Petitioner’s present address at a prison in Buckeye, Arizona. The

Court’s docket shows that the R&R was returned to the Court as undeliverable. Doc. #19.

It appears that Petitioner did not keep the Court advised of his change of address.

Case 2:04-cv-01198-DGC Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Although the Court has no duty to locate Petitioners who fail inform the Court of

changes in address, in this case the Petitioner’s Motion to Supplement provides his current

address. The Court accordingly will direct the Clerk to mail a copy of the R&R to Petitioner

along with a copy of this Order. The warning contained on page 7 of the R&R shall apply

from the date of service of the R&R and this Order. The Court will also refer the Motion to

Supplement to Magistrate Judge Duncan for consideration.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge Duncan’s R&R (Doc. #18) and this Order shall be mailed to

Petitioner at the address shown on his Motion to Supplement (Doc. # 20).

2. The warning contained on page 7 of the R&R shall apply from the date of

service of the R&R and this Order on Petitioner at the address shown on Doc. #20.

3. Petitioner’s Motion to Supplement (Doc. #20) shall be referred to the

Magistrate Judge for consideration.

DATED this 9th day of June, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-01198-DGC Document 21 Filed 06/13/06 Page 2 of 2