Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02618/USCOURTS-caed-2_09-cv-02618-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 12:635 Breach of Insurance Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LINDA ENGER, individually and 

on behalf of all others 

similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

an Illinois Corporation; and 

ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND 

CASUALTY COMPANY, an 

Illinois Corporation,

Defendants.

No. 2:09-cv-02618-GEB-EFB

ORDER

On January 22, 2016, Defendants filed a “Notice of 

Related Cases” document, in which they state this closed case is 

related to a putative class action filed in the Northern District 

of California “styled Linda Enger v. Allstate Insurance Company, 

et al.,” Case No. 4:16-cv-00136-JSW. (Notice of Related Cases 

2:3-5, ECF No. 35.) Defendants argue: “Pursuant to Rule 123 of 

the Civil Local Rules of the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of California,” Enger should be reassigned to 

the undersigned judge. (Id. at 1:23-24.)

Case 2:09-cv-02618-GEB-EFB Document 36 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

However, Local Rule 123 does not authorize the 

requested inter-district reassignment order. Therefore, the 

request is denied. 

Dated: January 25, 2016

Case 2:09-cv-02618-GEB-EFB Document 36 Filed 01/25/16 Page 2 of 2