Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00518/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00518-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The United States Postal Service returned the order served on plaintiff on February 13, 2006, as 1

undeliverable. A notation on the envelope indicated: Return to Sender - Cannot Locate. However, plaintiff has not

notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s prior address is fully

effective. See Local Rule 83-182(f). 

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICOLAS GONZALEZ-CAYETANO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF

AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:05-cv-00518-OWW-LJO-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 13)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff Nicolas Gonzalez-Cayetano (“plaintiff”) is a

federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this

civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 26, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.1

Case 1:05-cv-00518-OWW -LJO Document 17 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 26,

2006, is ADOPTED in full; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on

plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s order of December 16,

2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00518-OWW -LJO Document 17 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 2