Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00099/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-00099-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 In her objection to the Report and Recommendation, the petitioner

does not contest that her amended habeas petition is now moot. Instead, she

requests for the first time that her period of supervised release be reduced to one

year because she has been a model citizen since her release from prison. 

 The issue of whether the petitioner should be released early from her

supervised release is not one that the Court can resolve through this habeas

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Teena Marie Kerekes,

Petitioner,

vs.

Craig Apker, Warden,

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-0099-PHX-PGR (DKD)

 

 ORDER

Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Duncan in light of the petitioner’s Appeal to Report and Recommendation

(doc. #16), the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly concluded that the

petitioner’s amended habeas petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, wherein

the petitioner challenges the Bureau of Prison’s determination that she was

ineligible for early release upon completion of the Residential Drug and Alcohol

Program, must be dismissed as moot because the petitioner was released from

BOP custody on December 19, 2009.1

 Therefore,

Case 2:08-cv-00099-PGR Document 17 Filed 05/27/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

petition as it is an entirely separate issue. If the petitioner wishes to request an

early termination of her supervised release, she may seek that relief by filing a

separate motion with the Court that sets forth in detail the basis for her request

(and she must serve a copy of any such motion on the United States Attorney.)

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(doc. #15) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s First Amended Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 U.S.C. § 2241) (doc.

#4) is denied and that this action is dismissed as moot. The Clerk of the Court

shall enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this 27th day of May, 2009.

Case 2:08-cv-00099-PGR Document 17 Filed 05/27/09 Page 2 of 2