Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01122/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01122-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES DANIEL CARL,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-1122 MCE KJM P

vs.

ROBERT HOREL, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 18, 2008, the this court recommended that respondent’s motion to

dismiss be denied because the underlying habeas petition was moot. Petitioner filed objections

to the findings and recommendations supported by an exhibit, showing that the disciplinary

hearing he challenged in this action was one of the three factors the parole board relied upon in

denying him parole.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (docket no. 9) are vacated; and

/////

Case 2:07-cv-01122-MCE -KJM Document 11 Filed 05/09/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Within thirty days of the date of this order, respondent may file points and

authorities addressing the question whether the Parole Board’s reliance on the disciplinary as one

of three factors to deny parole undercuts the finding of mootness. Petitioner’s reply, if any, is

due within fifteen days of the date respondent’s points and authorities are filed. 

DATED: May 9, 2008. 

2/carl1122.vf&r

Case 2:07-cv-01122-MCE -KJM Document 11 Filed 05/09/08 Page 2 of 2