Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01130/USCOURTS-ca4-15-01130-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1130

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

MCDONALD’S CORPORATION,

Defendant.

No. 15-1131

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-1132

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,

Appeal: 15-1130 Doc: 26 Filed: 06/29/2015 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. 

(8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv-03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-02890-RWT)

Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rungrudee Suteerachanon, Appellant Pro Se. Nigel F. Telman, Amanda 

C. Wiley, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Alex Chad 

Weinstein, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1130 Doc: 26 Filed: 06/29/2015 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the district court’s orders 

dismissing her employment discrimination actions and denying her 

motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Suteerachanon v. 

McDonald’s Rest. of Md., Inc., Nos. 8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-02890-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 24, 2014 & Jan. 9, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Appeal: 15-1130 Doc: 26 Filed: 06/29/2015 Pg: 3 of 3