Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05611/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-05611-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1365 Environmental Matters

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

CHARLES M. O’CONNER (CA State Bar No. 56320)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Ave., 10th Floor

San Francisco, California 94102

Tel: (415) 436-7180

SUE ELLEN WOOLDRIGE

Assistant Attorney General

Environment and Natural Resources Division

LILY N. CHINN (CA State Bar No. 203173)

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Environmental Defense Section

P.O. Box 23986

Washington, D.C. 20026-3986

Tel: (202) 514-0135

Fax: (202) 514-8865

Email: lily.chinn@usdoj.gov

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

BAYKEEPER, HUMBOLDT

BAYKEEPER, ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS

FOUNDATION, and COMMUNITIES FOR

A BETTER ENVIRONMENT,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY, STEPHEN L.

JOHNSON, as Administrator of the United

States Environmental Protection Agency,

WAYNE NASTRI, as Regional

Administrator of the United States

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 06-5611 CRB

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN

ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR

EPA TO RESPOND TO

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case 3:06-cv-05611-CRB Document 18 Filed 11/15/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

/ As the filing attorney, I, Lily N. Chinn, attest that Plaintiffs’ attorney, Christopher

Sproul, finds the contents of this filed document acceptable and has given me permission to

electronically file this stipulated motion on his behalf.

-2-

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on November 8, 2006 in this

case and noticed it for hearing on December 15, 2006;

WHEREAS, EPA has requested additional time to prepare its response to Plaintiffs’

motion for summary judgment in light of the fact that the undersigned attorney for EPA and her

agency counsel have conflicts with other work-related duties and the fact that two federal

holidays (Veteran’s Day and Thanksgiving) fall within EPA’s response period; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties have agreed to extend the briefing schedule as indicated

below and request that the Court issue an order as follows:

1. Defendants’ response to Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment shall be filed

no later than November 30, 2006.

2. Plaintiffs’ reply brief shall be filed no later than December 5, 2006.

3. The hearing on the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment will remain on

calendar for December 15, 2006 at 10:00 a.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: November 13, 2006

FOR PLAINTIFFS: /s/ Christopher Sproul 

CHRISTOPHER SPROUL

Environmental Advocates

5135 Anza Street

San Francisco, CA 94121

FOR DEFENDANTS: KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

SUE ELLEN WOOLDRIDGE

Assistant Attorney General

Environment & Natural Resources Division

 /s/ Lily N. Chinn1/ 

LILY N. CHINN 

Trial Attorney

United States Department of Justice

Case 3:06-cv-05611-CRB Document 18 Filed 11/15/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3-

Environmental Defense Section

P.O. Box 23986

Washington, D.C. 20026-3986

It is so ordered.

DATED: ___________________ ___________________________________

HON. CHARLES BREYER

United States District Court

November 15, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:06-cv-05611-CRB Document 18 Filed 11/15/06 Page 3 of 3