Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02479/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02479-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

ForUnited States Distr the Northern District Court ict of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ForUnited States Distr the Northern District Court ict of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX

MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,

 /

This document relates to:

Mary Brady 06-2479

___________________________________/

No. MDL 05-01699 CRB

ORDER RE: MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

Now pending for decision is the motion of the law firm of Leger, Shaw & DeSue to

withdraw as counsel of record for Mary Brady, who has brought claims on behalf of her

deceased husband Larry Brady.

After carefully considering the motion, the Court ORDERS PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE as to why (1) the law firm of Leger, Shaw & DeSue’s motion to withdraw as

counsel of record should not be granted; and (2) plaintiff’s lawsuit should not be dismissed

for a lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. If plaintiff wishes to contest the

withdrawal of counsel and/or dismissal of the plaintiff’s lawsuit for failure to prosecute,

plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing on or before April 13, 2007 of the reasons the

withdrawal should not be granted or the case dismissed. In particular, if plaintiff wishes to

proceed with this action, plaintiff shall advise the Court of the name and address of her new 

Case 3:06-cv-02479-CRB Document 27 Filed 03/16/07 Page 1 of 2
ForUnited States Distr the Northern District Court ict of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\showcauseorders\legelwithdraw 2 alosc.wpd

counsel or, if plaintiff will be proceeding without a lawyer, plaintiff must advise the Court as

to how the Court should contact plaintiff. In addition, plaintiff shall advise the Court as to

whether plaintiff has completed and served defendants with a plaintiff fact sheet and

provided defendants with authorizations for the release of medical records. Plaintiff is

warned that plaintiff’s failure to communicate with the Court in writing as set forth above

may result in dismissal of plaintiff’s claims with prejudice.

Plaintiff’s counsel shall ensure that plaintiff receives a copy of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-02479-CRB Document 27 Filed 03/16/07 Page 2 of 2