Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00589/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00589-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY ELL SHEHEE,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

RAUL FLORES, et al.,

 Defendants.

1:14-cv-00589-LJO-GSA-PC

ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT FOR 

VIOLATION OF INFORMATIONAL 

ORDER

(Doc. 19.)

Gregory Ell Shehee (“Plaintiff”) is a Fresno County Jail inmate, proceeding pro se with 

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing 

this action on April 23, 2014. (Doc. 1.)

On March 10, 2015, Plaintiff filed a document notifying the court of his need for access 

to the library and his legal documents. (Doc. 19.) The document refers to multiple case 

numbers, and the caption on the front page names one of Plaintiff‟s other cases titled Shehee 

vs. Ahlin, indicating that Plaintiff expects the court to consider the same document in multiple 

cases. (Id.)

Case 1:14-cv-00589-LJO-GSA Document 20 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff may not submit documents for multiple cases in this manner. As Plaintiff was 

informed in the court‟s Informational Order issued on April 24, 2014:

“If a party has more than one case pending and wants to file the 

same document in more than one case, the party must provide a 

separate copy of that document, with the correct case number in 

the first page caption, for each case. Documents with more than 

one case number in the caption may be stricken/returned. . . . A 

document which is „stricken‟ will not be considered by the Court 

for any purpose.” 

 

(Informational Order, Doc. 3 at 2 ¶II.A, F.) Plaintiff was also previously advised in the court‟s 

January 12, 2015 order not to refer to multiple cases in one document.1 (Doc. 14.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff‟s document filed on March 10, 

2015 in this action is STRICKEN from the record for violation of the court‟s Informational 

Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 17, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

1

In fact, Plaintiff‟s prior motion filed on January 5, 2015 was stricken by the court for the same 

violation of the Informational Order. (Docs. 13, 14.)

Case 1:14-cv-00589-LJO-GSA Document 20 Filed 03/17/15 Page 2 of 2