Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00728/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00728-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights

---

ORDER GRANTING INITIAL EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOUGLAS R. THORN (CA Bar No. 133521) 

dthorn@akk-law.com

J. SCOTT SMITH (CA Bar No. 151163) 

jsmith@akk-law.com

CORI R. SARNO (CA Bar No. 230559) 

csarno@akk-law.com

Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff 

601 University Avenue, Suite 150 

Sacramento, California 95825 

Telephone – (916) 564-6100 

Facsimile – (916) 564-6263 

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF OROVILLE, 

LIZ EHRENSTROM, SHARON ATTEBERRY 

and ERIC TEITELMAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID NOEL, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITY OF OROVILLE, LIZ EHRENSTROM, 

SHARON ATTEBERRY, ERIC 

TEITELMAN, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 

1,000, INCLUSIVE 

Defendant(s). 

Case Number: 2:07-CV-00728-WBS-KJM 

ORDER GRANTING INITIAL EX PARTE 

APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

[Local Rule 6-144(c) 

Date: Ex Parte 

Time: Ex Parte 

Place: Courtroom 5 

Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb 

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD: 

The Court has considered Defendants’ initial ex parte application for an extension of time to 

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby grants the application. 

Defendants shall have through and including June 4, 2007 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Date: May 7, 2007 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:07-cv-00728-WBS -KJM Document 7 Filed 05/09/07 Page 1 of 1