Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-01655/USCOURTS-casd-3_15-cv-01655-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

---

1

15cv1655-GPC (BLM)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLIFFORD J. BOURGEOIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 15cv1655-GPC (BLM)

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION 

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH 

MODIFICATION

[ECF No. 37]

On June 23, 2016, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the Court enter the 

parties’ Protective Order. ECF No. 37. The Court has considered the Stipulated Protective Order

[ECF No. 37-1] and, for good cause shown, the joint motion is GRANTED with the following 

modification:

Paragraph 11 should read: “Before any materials produced in discovery, answers to 

interrogatories, responses to requests for admissions, deposition transcripts, or other documents 

which are designated as Confidential Information are filed with the Court for any purpose, the 

Case 3:15-cv-01655-GPC-BLM Document 38 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 2
2

15cv1655-GPC (BLM)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

party seeking to file such material must seek permission of the Court to file the material under 

seal. A sealing order may issue only upon a showing that the information is privileged or 

protectable under the law. The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of the 

confidential or privileged material. To file a document under seal, the parties must also comply 

with the procedures explained in Section 2.j of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies 

and Procedures Manual for the United States District Court for the Southern District of California 

and Civil Local Rule 79.2. In addition, in accordance with Judge Major's preferences, a 

party must file a ‘public’ version of any document that it seeks to file under seal. In 

the public version, the party may redact only that information that is deemed 

‘Confidential Information.’ The party should file the redacted document(s) 

simultaneously with a joint motion or ex parte application requesting that the 

confidential portions of the document(s) be filed under seal and setting forth good 

cause for the request.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 6/24/2016

Case 3:15-cv-01655-GPC-BLM Document 38 Filed 06/24/16 Page 2 of 2