Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02017/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-02017-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 560
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENIS K. ROTROFF,

Plaintiff,

v.

PAM AHLIN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-02017-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

ECF Nos. 4, 5, and 17

Plaintiff Denis K. Rotroff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 

this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 5, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a findings and recommendations 

recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF No. 4) be denied, 

without prejudice, and that Plaintiff’s motion regarding the security requirement (ECF No. 5) be 

denied as moot. (ECF No. 17.) Neither party has responded.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

Case 1:13-cv-02017-LJO-MJS Document 18 Filed 09/30/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 5, 2014, are adopted in full 

and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF No. 4) is DENIED, 

without prejudice, and Plaintiff’s motion seeking a waiver of the security requirement (ECF No. 

5) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 29, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-02017-LJO-MJS Document 18 Filed 09/30/14 Page 2 of 2