Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00169/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00169-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

---

PRETRIAL ORDER - 1

2:06-CV-0169-RRB

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. 2:06-cv-0169-RRB

ORDER REGARDING

COST BILL

Before the Court at Dockets 109, 110, and 112 are cost

bills submitted by Plaintiff. Defendant objects at Docket 113.

The cost bills submitted are in some instances duplicative and not

justified by law.

A single cost bill shall be filed in this matter, not one

by each attorney who has appeared for Plaintiff. Moreover, the

costs requested shall comply with both the local rules and the

appropriate Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff shall not

request costs not authorized by law or supported by invoice.

Plaintiff may have until the close of business on March 10, 2008,

in which to file an amended consolidated cost bill. Defendant

BRANDEN JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case 2:06-cv-00169-RRB-GGH Document 140 Filed 03/03/08 Page 1 of 2
PRETRIAL ORDER - 2

2:06-CV-0169-RRB

shall have until the close of business on March 21, 2008, to submit

any opposition.

The hearing currently scheduled in this matter for

March 5, 2008, is VACATED.

ENTERED this 29th day of February, 2008.

S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00169-RRB-GGH Document 140 Filed 03/03/08 Page 2 of 2