Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02461/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-02461-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VIET BUI, individually and on behalf of 

all other similarly situated employees, and 

on behalf of the general public,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SPRINT CORPORATION, a SPRINT 

COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., 

a Delaware Corporation; 

SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO., 

a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 

through 20, inclusive,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-02461-TLN-AC

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Intervenors’ Ex Parte Application to stay the 

mediation that the Bui Parties have scheduled for March 9, 2015, until after the Court issues an 

order on Proposed Intervenors’ Motion, currently before the Court. (ECF No. 28.) The Court has 

also reviewed both Plaintiff and Defendant’s Oppositions. (ECF No. 30-31.) At this time the 

Court notes that neither of the classes, in the instant action Bui or in the Guilbaud, et al. v. Sprint 

Nextel Corp. and Sprint/United Management Co., Inc. case, have been certified. The Court finds 

Case 2:14-cv-02461-TLN-AC Document 32 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

that staying the mediation is inappropriate at this time. Thus, the Proposed Intervenors’ Ex Parte 

Application is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 6, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-02461-TLN-AC Document 32 Filed 03/06/15 Page 2 of 2