Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04676/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-04676-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DANIEL CANADAY, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

EDMUNDO ORTEGA, JR., et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

JASON WILLIAMS, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

LAMBERTO VALENCIA, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 15-cv-04648-JSW 

Case No. 15-cv-04676-JSW 

Case No. 15-cv-04732-JSW 

Case No. 15-cv-04771-JSW 

Case 4:15-cv-04676-JSW Document 26 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 3
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

JEFFREY COLEMAN, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

RICHARD NELSON, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

CALEB DUBOIS, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

GREGORY PETERS, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 15-cv-04782-JSW 

Case No. 15-cv-04793-JSW 

Case No. 15-cv-04809-JSW 

Case No. 15-cv-04869-JSW 

ORDER RE BRIEFING OF TOLLING 

AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL 

ISSUES 

Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 32 

The Court has received and considered the parties’ February 19, 2016 briefs in Canaday v. 

Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04648-JSW. Defendants propose that the tolling and collateral estoppel 

questions in Canaday and these related cases be presented in a single motion for judgment on the 

pleadings by Defendants. Plaintiffs agree that it is unlikely that a decision in Anderson v. 

Michaels Stores, Inc., Ninth Circuit No. 14-56726, will be fully dispositive of the tolling issue 

presented in these related cases. Accordingly, the Court will not stay consideration of the tolling 

and collateral estoppel issues pending a decision in Anderson. Defendants may file a single 

Case 4:15-cv-04676-JSW Document 26 Filed 02/22/16 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

mo

mo

rela

rela

doc

Da

otion for judg

The mo

otion may be

ated, not con

ated cases, th

cument in ea

IT IS S

ated: Februar

gment on the

otion for judg

e filed in all o

nsolidated. T

hey must lis

ach case. 

SO ORDER

ry 22, 2016 

e pleadings r

gment on the

of the related

Therefore, if

t each applic

RED. 

3

raising the to

e pleadings m

d cases. The

f the parties 

cable case nu

olling and co

may be filed

e parties are 

wish to file 

umber in the

JE

Un

ollateral esto

d in Canaday

 reminded th

papers in mo

e caption and

EFFREY S. W

nited States D

oppel issues.

y only, or a s

hat these cas

ore than one

d separately 

WHITE 

District Judg

. 

single 

ses are 

e of the 

e-file the 

ge 

Case 4:15-cv-04676-JSW Document 26 Filed 02/22/16 Page 3 of 3