Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00186/USCOURTS-caed-2_14-cv-00186-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 950
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT

DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RICHARD W. COREY, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:14-cv-00186-MCE-AC

ORDER

On March 25, 2014, the parties stipulated that Plaintiffs’ Complaint against 

Defendants Richard W. Corey and Mary D. Nichols, in their personal capacities only, be 

dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 26. The parties further stipulated that Defendants 

Corey and Nichols will remain as Defendants in their official capacities only and that 

Defendant Matt Rodriquez will also remain as a Defendant only in his official capacity. 

Id. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Defendants Richard W. Corey and 

Mary D. Nichols, in their personal capacities only, are DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE.

1

 1

Although the docket currently shows that all three individual Defendants, Corey, Nichols and 

Rodriguez, were named as Defendants in both their official and personal capacities, only Defendants 

Corey and Nichols were initially named in their personal capacities. See ECF No. 1 at 7-8, ¶¶ 24-26. 

Plaintiffs named Rodriguez as a Defendant in his official capacity only. See id. at 8 ¶ 26.

Case 2:14-cv-00186-MCE-AC Document 28 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On January 27, 2014, Defendants moved to dismiss Defendants Corey and 

Nichols in their personal capacities. Mot., ECF No. 21. In light of the parties’ 

stipulations, ECF Nos. 26-27, Defendants’ Motion, ECF No. 21, is DENIED as MOOT. 

See ECF No. 27 at 3 (¶ 5).

As set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants Richard W. Corey and Mary D. Nichols, in their personal 

capacities only, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

2. Defendants Richard W. Corey, Mary D. Nichols and Matt Rodriquez remain 

Defendants in their official capacities only; and

2. Defendant’s Motion, ECF No. 21, is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 27, 2014

Case 2:14-cv-00186-MCE-AC Document 28 Filed 03/28/14 Page 2 of 2