Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00914/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00914-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICOLAS MORAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

K. DUTRA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:11-cv-0914-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 

DEFENDANTS AUTEN AND DUTRA’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

ECF No. 34

Plaintiff Nicholas Moran (“Plaintiff”), a California state prisoner, filed this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 7, 2011. The matter was referred to a United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 19, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations, 

recommending that Defendants Auten and Dutra’s motion to dismiss be denied. (ECF No. 34.) 

The parties have filed objections. (ECF Nos. 35, 37.)

///

///

///

///

Case 1:11-cv-00914-LJO-MJS Document 39 Filed 09/13/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 304, this 

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 

analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 19, 2013, are adopted in full; 

and

2. Defendants Auten and Dutra’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23) is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 13, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:

66h44d

Case 1:11-cv-00914-LJO-MJS Document 39 Filed 09/13/13 Page 2 of 2