Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03236/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-03236-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1-PA/3625692.1 STIPULATION – Case No. 05-03236 CRB 

ANDREW J. GRAY IV (CA Bar No. 202137) 

BRUNO TARABICHI (CA Bar No. 215129) 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

2 Palo Alto Square 

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700 

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2212 

Tel: 650.843.4000 

Fax: 650.843.4001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Con-way Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Con-way Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Manila Industries, Inc. and Texas International 

Property Associates, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 05 03236 CRB 

STIPULATION REQUESTING 

CONTINUANCE OF THE 

INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE TO MAY 11, 

2007 

Pursuant to Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2(d), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND 

AGREED, by and between the parties’ undersigned counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, that 

the Initial Case Management Conference be continued from February 9, 2007 at 8:30 a.m. to May 

11, 2007 and that the Joint Case Management Statement be due ten days before the May 11, 2007 

Case Management Conference. 

Good cause exists for the continuance request as an Amended Complaint has been 

recently filed, the time for Defendants to answer the Amended Complaint has not yet expired, 

Defendant Manila Industries’ previous counsel has withdrawn and this matter has been reassigned 

to new counsel, and Plaintiff and Defendant Manila Industries have agreed in principle to a 

settlement of the matter and need the additional time to finalize a written agreement, which, if 

completed, will obviate the need for a Case Management Conference. Plaintiff’s counsel has also 

Case 3:05-cv-03236-CRB Document 36 Filed 02/06/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

STIPULATION – Case No. 05-03236 CRB 

advised Defendant Texas International Property Associates’ counsel of the instant stipulation. 

Dated: February 1, 2007 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

By /s/ Bruno Tarabichi 

Andrew J. Gray 

Bruno Tarabichi 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CNF Inc. 

Dated: February 1, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW L. KABAK 

By /s/ Matthew L. Kabak 

Matthew L. Kabak 

Attorneys for Defendants 

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 

Date: Honorable Judge Charles R. Breyer 

Feb. 02, 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-03236-CRB Document 36 Filed 02/06/07 Page 2 of 2