Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03762/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-03762-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

C07-03762 MMC, STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE 55420v1 

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL 

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 

THOMAS C. LEE (SBN 104624) 

VICTORIA R. NUETZEL (SBN 115124) 

300 Lakeside Drive, 23rd Floor West 

Oakland, CA 94612-3534 

Tel: (510) 464-6023 

Fax: (510) 464-6049 

EMAIL: VNUETZE@BART.GOV 

Attorneys for Defendant 

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO 

PAUL MELKER, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID 

TRANSIT DISTRICT, 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: C07-03762 MMC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING HEARING DATE FOR 

DEFENDANT BAY AREA RAPID 

TRANSIT DISTRICT’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

 WHEREAS, Defendant, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART”), filed a 

Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to FRCP, Rule 56 and set a hearing date for that motion on 

June 27, 2008; and

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel is unavailable because he will be in trial on the date and time 

set for said hearing; and 

RE:

Case 3:07-cv-03762-MMC Document 43 Filed 05/29/08 Page 1 of 2
C07-03762 MMC, STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE 55420v1 

-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to continue the hearing date of BART’s motion to 

accommodate Plaintiff’s attorney’s schedule. 

 NOW, THERFORE, it is hereby stipulated between the parties that the hearing date on 

BART’s Motion for Summary Judgment shall be continued from June 27, 2008, and be set for hearing 

on July 18, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. The time for any opposition and reply shall be determined by the July 

18 hearing date in accordance with Local Rule 7-3. 

Dated: May 27, 2008 By: /s/ Victoria R. Nuetzel___

 Victoria R. Nuetzel 

 Attorney for Defendant BART 

Dated: May 27, 2008 By:_/s/ Michael C. Cohen_______

 Michael C. Cohen 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, Paul Melker 

ORDER 

 Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED: 

 The hearing date of Defendant San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment shall be continued and set for hearing on July 18, 2008. Any opposition and reply 

shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 7-3. 

Dated: May __, 2008 ______________________________ 

 The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

 United States District Court 

Having read and considered

vacated. Plaintiff's opposition shall be filed no later than June 13, 2008,

and defendant's reply shall be filed no later than June 20, 2008, on which date the Court will deem the

matter submitted. If the Court determines that oral

argument would be of assistance, the Court will schedule a hearing.

29

Summary Judgment shall be

Case 3:07-cv-03762-MMC Document 43 Filed 05/29/08 Page 2 of 2