Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02029/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-cv-02029-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SEALING 

C-08-2029 CRB 

DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP 

Barabara A. Caulfield 

bcaulfield@dl.com 

Peter E. Root 

proot@dl.com 

1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 

East Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 845-7000 

Facsimile: (650) 845-7333 

Attorneys for 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MARY E. BARBOUR, AS TRUSTEE OF 

THE MARY E. BARBOUR FAMILY 

TRUST ONE, Derivatively On Behalf of 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GREGORY L. REYES, et al., 

Defendants. 

 - andBROCADE COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

 Nominal Defendant. 

Case No. C 08-02029 CRB 

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING A

PORTION OF AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 3:08-cv-02029-CRB Document 83 Filed 08/11/08 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1. [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SEALING 

CV-08-2029 CRB 

Having considered plaintiff Mary E. Barbour’s (“Plaintiff's”) Administrative Motion To 

Lodge A Portion Of Amended Complaint Under Seal, the Declaration of Tom MacMitchell filed 

by Nominal Defendant Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (“Brocade”) pursuant to Civil 

Local Rule 79-5(d), and all other papers filed in support of and opposition to the Administrative 

Motion, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby finds that Brocade has demonstrated good 

cause for the sealing of the following portions of the Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint: 

Amended 

Complaint 

¶ 

Page Line(s) 

Starting After The 

Word(s) 

Ending Before The 

Word(s) 

143 46 24 for shares 

143 47 1 for shares 

146 47 22 for shares 

149 48 17 grant options 

150 48 28 purchase shares 

152 49 12-13 for shares 

158 50 23 purchase shares 

164 52 1 buy shares 

165 52 5 to shares 

213 72 21 of Brocade 

279 112 3-5 window Thus 

The Court hereby orders that each of these portions of the Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint 

shall be filed under seal. 

Dated: _______, 2008 

Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

U.S. District Court Judge 

Aug. 11 Except as to 213. CRB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:08-cv-02029-CRB Document 83 Filed 08/11/08 Page 2 of 2