Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00595/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00595-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURIN CARLVIN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF )

CORRECTIONS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:05-cv-00595-REC-SMS-HC

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 7)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On July 6, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and

Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be

DISMISSED pursuant to Local Rule 11-110. This Report and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that

any objections were to be filed within twenty (20) days from the

date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed

timely objections to the Report and Recommendation.

//

/

Case 1:05-cv-00595-REC -SMS Document 8 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's

objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the

Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation, filed July 6, 2005, is

ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED

pursuant to Local Rule 11-110; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2005 /s/ Robert E. Coyle 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00595-REC -SMS Document 8 Filed 08/09/05 Page 2 of 2