Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-ared-4_04-cv-01169/USCOURTS-ared-4_04-cv-01169-30/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

In re: 

PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

DONNA SCROGGIN

v.

WYETH, et. al.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: 

MDL Docket No. 4:03CV1507-WRW

 4:04CV01169

 PLAINTIFF

 

 DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Wyeth’s Net Worth (Doc. No. 571) -- is

GRANTED --because I believe Professor Brill’s analysis is correct. No evidence of net worth will be

admissible.

Plaintiff’s Objection to Evidence of General Goodness (Doc. No. 590). I will rule on this after

opening statements. If the issue is not raised in opening statement, I’ll rule at the close of Defendants’

case as to whether Plaintiff can submit rebuttal evidence. 

Defendants’ Motions Exclude Testimony Re Total Excess Breast Cancer In Punitive

Damages Stage (Doc. Nos. 569, 579) are DENIED. However, the parties should submit a limiting

instruction per Philip Morris.

Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Matthew Hollon in Punitive Damages

Phase (Doc. No. 567) is GRANTED.

Wyeth’s Objection to Certain Designations by Plaintiff of Dr. Colditz’s Testimony

(Unrelated to Excess Breast Cancer) (Doc. No. 581) -- the rulings by Judge Jones on deposition

designations for Colditz stand. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of March, 2008.

/s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr._________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:04-cv-01169-BRW Document 602 Filed 03/03/08 Page 1 of 1