Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-04485/USCOURTS-cand-5_08-cv-04485-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (88625)

NORA FRIMANN, Chief Trial Attorney (93249)

CLIFFORD GREENBERG, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (122612)

RICHARD D. NORTH, Deputy City Attorney (225617)

Office of the City Attorney 6th

200 East Santa Clara Street, 1 FI.

San Jos6, California 95113-1905

Telephone Number: (408) 535-1900

Facsimile Number: (408) 998-3131

E-Mail Address: cao.main@sanjoseca.gov

Attorneys for CITY OF SAN JOSE; CITY OF SAN

JOSE CHIEF OF POLICE ROBERT DAVIS; POLICE

OFFICER RODRIGUEZ #2360

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MARC L. PINCKNEY,

Plaintiff,

Vo

CITY OF SAN JOSE; CITY OF SAN

JOSE CHIEF OF POLICE ROBERT

DAVIS in his individual capacity and

official capacity as Chief of Police for the

CITY OF SAN JOSE; POLICE OFFICER

RODRIGUEZ #2360, and DOES 1-20,

inclusive,

Defendants.

Case Number: C08-04485 RMW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER

The City of San Jose, Chief of Police Robert Davis and police officer Rodriguez

(#2360), defendants in the above-captioned matter, and plaintiff Marc L. Pinckney, do

hereby agree and stipulate as follows, and request the Court order same.

This stipulation is based on the following facts and circumstances:

The aforementioned defendants moved for, and were granted, summary judgment

on all of plaintiff’s claims against them;

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No: C08-04485 RMW

626141 [1 ].doc

XXXXXXXXX xxxxxxxxx *E-FILED - 2/10/10*

Case 5:08-cv-04485-RMW Document 42 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff has a right to appeal the Court’s ruling on said defendants’ motion for

summary judgment;

The aforementioned defendants have filed a bill of costs.

The parties have agreed and stipulate to a mutual waiver of fees and costs, and

plaintiff further stipulates and agrees to waive his right to appeal the decision of this Court

with respect to the City of San Jose, Chief of Police Robert Davis and police officer

Rodriguez (#2360).

Based on the foregoing, it is stipulated as follows:

1. Defendants City of San Jose, Chief of Police Robert Davis and police officer

Rodriguez (#2360) hereby withdraw their Bill of Costs;

2. Plaintiff hereby waives all rights to appeal the Court’s grant of summary

judgment to defendants City of San Jose, Chief of Police Robert Davis and

police officer Rodriguez (#2360);

3. Plaintiff and the aforementioned defendants all to bear their own attorney’s

fees and costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February ~__~_, 2010

Dated: February,~, 2010

Respectfully submitted,

By:

_RI-CHA~p g. NORTH

Deputy ’City Attorney

Attorneys for CITY OF SAN JOSE; CITY

OF SAN JOSE CHIEF OF POLICE

ROBERT DAVIS; POLICE OFFICER

RODRIGUEZ #2360

Respe,~~~’~

In pro per

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Case No: C08-04485 RMW

62614111].doc

xxxxxxxxxx

Case 5:08-cv-04485-RMW Document 42 Filed 02/10/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

2O

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Based on the forgoing stipulation of the parties, the Court does hereby adopt said

stipulation and makes same an order of this Court.

Date: ., 2010

JUDGE RONALD M. WHYTE

U.S.D.C. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No: C08-04485 RMW

626141 [1 ].doc

2/9 xxxxxxxx

Case 5:08-cv-04485-RMW Document 42 Filed 02/10/10 Page 3 of 3