Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01829/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-01829-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

RALPH RODRIGUEZ, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIV 05-01829 PHX NVW MEA

)

JOSEPH ARPAIO, ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

) FOR DISMISSAL 

 Defendant. ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE

_______________________________)

Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 17, 2005. On

October 21, 2005, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff

to complete and return a service packet for Defendant to the

Court by November 17, 2005. That order warned Plaintiff that

his failure to timely comply with the provisions of the order

would result in the dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Rule

41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Plaintiff was warned that his failure to acquire a

waiver of service from Defendant or to complete service of

process on Defendant within 60 days of the date the service

order was issued, by December 19, 2005, would result in the

dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m), Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure, and Rule 16.2(b)(2)(B), of the United States

District Court for the District of Arizona Local Rules of Civil

Procedure. The civil docket in this matter indicates that

Case 2:05-cv-01829-NVW Document 9 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

Plaintiff has failed to acquire a waiver of service from

Defendant or to complete service of process on Defendant.

On December 29, 2005, the Court allowed Plaintiff

until January 27, 2006, to show cause why this case should not

be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to effect service of

process on Defendant as required by the Court’s order of October

5, 2005, and Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff has failed to show cause for his failure to abide by

the Court’s orders and to effect service of process on

Defendant. 

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this case be

dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to serve the Defendant in this

matter and for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s

order of October 21, 2005, and Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DATED this 1st day of February, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-01829-NVW Document 9 Filed 02/10/06 Page 2 of 2