Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03171-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL 

Case No. C 04-03171-CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

OKI AMERICA, INC., OKI ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRY CO., LTD., OKI DATA 

CORPORATION, and OKI DATA 

AMERICAS, INC., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 No. C 04-03171-CRB-JL 

vs. 

 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., STIPULATION TO FILE 

 Defendants DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL 

 

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., 

 Counterclaimant, 

vs. 

 

OKI AMERICA, INC., OKI ELECTRIC 

INDUSTRY CO., LTD., OKI DATA 

CORPORATION, and OKI DATA 

AMERICAS, INC., 

 Counterdefendants. 

 

WHEREAS, on February 28, 2006, Dr. Stephen Beebe was produced as a witness 

for deposition at the offices of Vinson & Elkins, 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100, Austin, 

Texas, and sat for a videotaped deposition; and 

WHEREAS Dr. Beebe’s testimony in that deposition extensively discussed 

proprietary information relating to AMD’s research, development, design and 

manufacturing of products; and 

WHEREAS counsel for AMD designated, without objection from Oki, the 

entirety of Dr. Beebe’s deposition as confidential under the Protective Order entered by 

this Court on December 8, 2004; and 

WHEREAS Oki now seeks to file with this Court a portion of the transcript of Dr. 

Beebe’s confidential deposition as Exhibit D in support of Oki’s Opposition to AMD’s 

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 241 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL 

Case No. C 04-03171-CRB 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of the 

Kurachi Patents, as well as a two-sentence portion of Oki’s Opposition to AMD’s Motion 

for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of the Kurachi 

Patents discussing that exhibit; 

IT IS HEREBY STIUPULATED AND AGREED by and between all parties that 

Exhibit D to Oki’s Opposition to AMD’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of 

Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of the Kurachi Patents, and a two-sentence portion of 

Oki’s Opposition to AMD’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the 

Asserted Claims of the Kurachi Patents, should be filed under seal because they contain 

confidential information protected under the Court’s protective Order entered December 

8, 2004. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: June 30, 2006 VINSON & ELKINS, LLP 

 

/s/ Adam V. Floyd 

 Adam V. Floyd 

Attorney for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD & 

EVANS, PLLC 

/s/ J.C. Rozendaal 

 J.C. Rozendaal 

Attorney for Oki America., et al. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ 

Charles R. Breyer 

United States District Judge 

July 5, 2006

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:04-cv-03171-CRB Document 241 Filed 07/07/06 Page 2 of 2