Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-04902/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-04902-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar #202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARSHALL LOSKOT

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARSHALL LOSKOT, an individual;

and DISABILITY RIGHTS

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION

SERVICES:HELPING YOU HELP

OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RAMADA INN OAKLAND; HEMANT

INVESTMENTS, a California limited

liability company, 

Defendant. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C-03-4902-SBA

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”) herein, each party is to bear its

own costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement, with any dispute or enforcement action being

brought before the assigned Magistrate Judge herein. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co.,

511 U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of

settlement agreements).

///

Case 4:03-cv-04902-SBA Document 18 Filed 05/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON -2-

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: May 11, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

 By: /s/ 

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs RONALD WILSON and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

Dated: May 9, 2005 HANSON, BRIDGETT, MARCUS, VLAHOS &

RUDY, LLP

By: /s/ 

Kurt A. Franklin

Attorneys for Defendant HEMANT

INVESTMENTS

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2005

 

Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

May 19

/s/ Saundra Brown Armstrong

Case 4:03-cv-04902-SBA Document 18 Filed 05/19/05 Page 2 of 2