Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02223/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-02223-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON Case No. C04-2223 

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

JESSICA A. DAYTON (State Bar #231698)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JAREK MOLSKI 

and DISABILITY RIGHTS 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION 

SERVICES: HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK MOLSKI, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING

YOU HELP OTHERS, a California public

benefit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RUNNING IRON BAR &

RESTAURANT; BRUCE SPRINGER, an

individual; ELIZABETH SPRINGER,

individually and as trustee of the

SPRINGER FAMILY 1992 TRUST; and

JENN & NELSON FOREMAN,

individuals dba RUNNING IRON BAR &

RESTAURANT, 

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C 04-2223 RMW

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action

in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own costs

and attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction

over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375

(1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement

agreements).

*E-FILED - 10/6/05*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON Case No. C04-2223 2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: August 26, 2005 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: _____/s/____________________________

Jessica A. Dayton

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAREK MOLSKI and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS

DATED: August 25, 2005 DE VRIES LAW GROUP

By: _____/s/______________________________

Daniel J. De Vries

Attorneys for Defendants JENN & NELSON

FOREMAN, individuals dba RUNNING IRON

BAR & RESTAURANT

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: _____________, 2005

 

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE

October 6

/S/ RONALD M. WHYTE