Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00997/USCOURTS-caed-2_15-cv-00997-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RAJ SINGH and KAREN SINGH a/k/a 

KIRAN RAWAT, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:15-cv-0997 MCE AC (PS) 

ORDER 

 Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 

United States Magistrate Judge by Local Rule 302(c)(21). 

 On March 16, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 27. Neither 

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 

 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 16, 2016 (ECF No. 27), are adopted in 

full; 

Case 2:15-cv-00997-AC Document 28 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15), is denied in its entirety; 

 3. Plaintiff’s Request to Enter Default and Default Judgment (ECF No. 17), is denied. 

Dated: May 5, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-00997-AC Document 28 Filed 05/06/16 Page 2 of 2