Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01569/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-01569-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDERICK MARC COOLEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-1569 DFL JFM PS

vs.

SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPUTIES C. BRADFORD and

A. ROPER, 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

On December 19, 2005, defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). 

No opposition to the motion to dismiss has been filed. 

Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be

filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party

will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to

the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides

that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in

sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may

/////

Case 2:05-cv-01569-DFL -JFM Document 11 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.”

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of January 19, 2006 is vacated. Hearing on defendants’

motion to dismiss is continued to February 9, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than

February 2, 2006. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a

statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: January 17, 2006. 

/001; cooley.noop

Case 2:05-cv-01569-DFL -JFM Document 11 Filed 01/17/06 Page 2 of 2