Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02823/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02823-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1121 Trademark Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Voluntary Dismissal 

Voluntary_Dismissal_07-10-15_fi.doc Page 1 of 2 LOVEJOY CASE NO.: C07-2823 MJJ

David E. Lovejoy (CSB No. 055283) 

102 Reed Ranch Road 

TIBURON, CA 94920-2025 

TEL: 415-435-8203 

FAX: 415-435-8857 

e-MAIL: david.lovejoy@sbcglobal.net 

Attorney for: Plaintiff AJANTA Corporation, 

 Plaintiff Kishore Kripalani 

WEIDE & MILLER, LTD. 

Gregory F. Buhyoff 

California State Bar No. 141437 

Bank of Nevada Bldg., Suite 530 

725 1 W, Lake Mead Blvd. 

Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 

 Tel: (702) 382-4804 

 e-Mail: GBuhyoff@weidemiller.com 

 Fax: (702) 382-4805 

Attorneys for: Defendants Gaylord, LLC 

 and Satpal S. Kohli 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AJANTA CORPORATION and 

Kishore Kripalani 

 Plaintiffs 

v. 

GAYLORD, LLC and 

Satpal S. Kohli 

 Defendants.

CASE NO. CASE NO. C07-2823 MJJ 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE BY PLAINTIFFS 

1. The parties have been in settlement negotiations but complete agreement on settlement has 

not been reached. 

Case 3:07-cv-02823-MJJ Document 17 Filed 10/15/07 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Voluntary Dismissal 

Voluntary_Dismissal_07-10-15_fi.doc Page 2 of 2 LOVEJOY CASE NO.: C07-2823 MJJ

2. In order to provide further time for settlement negotiations or other actions by the parties, 

Plaintiffs hereby enter this VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 which 

provides in part, 

“Rule 41. Dismissal of Actions 

(a) Voluntary Dismissal: Effect Thereof. 

(1) By Plaintiff; By Stipulation. 

Subject to the provisions of Rule 23(e), of Rule 66, and of any statute of 

the United States, an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order 

of court (i) by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the 

adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgment, ...” 

3. Plaintiffs have not been served with an answer or a motion for summary judgment. 

4. This action is not a class action nor has a receiver been appointed. 

5. Accordingly, Plaintiffs request this action to be dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE whereby 

Plaintiffs shall be free to re-file this action, any related action or otherwise proceed. 

Dated: October 15, 2007

By 

/S/ David E. Lovejoy

 

 David E. Lovejoy

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 AJANTA Corporation 

 Kishore Kripalani 

Case 3:07-cv-02823-MJJ Document 17 Filed 10/15/07 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Order Voluntary Dismissal 

Order_07-10-15.fi.doc Page 1 of 2 

CASE NO.: C07-2823 MJJ

David E. Lovejoy (CSB No. 055283) 

102 Reed Ranch Road 

TIBURON, CA 94920-2025 

TEL: 415-435-8203 

FAX: 415-435-8857 

e-MAIL: david.lovejoy@sbcglobal.net 

Attorney for: Plaintiff AJANTA Corporation, 

 Plaintiff Kishore Kripalani 

WEIDE & MILLER, LTD. 

Gregory F. Buhyoff 

California State Bar No. 141437 

Bank of Nevada Bldg., Suite 530 

725 1 W, Lake Mead Blvd. 

Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 

 Tel: (702) 382-4804 

 e-Mail: GBuhyoff@weidemiller.com 

 Fax: (702) 382-4805 

Attorneys for: Defendants Gaylord, LLC 

 and Satpal S. Kohli 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AJANTA CORPORATION and 

Kishore Kripalani 

 Plaintiffs 

v. 

GAYLORD, LLC and 

Satpal S. Kohli 

 Defendants.

CASE NO. CASE NO. C07-2823 MJJ 

ORDER TO ENTER VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

ORDER

1. The Plaintiffs AJANTA CORPORATION and KISHORE KRIPALANI by counsel have entered a VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL of this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

2. Plaintiffs have not been served with an answer or a motion for summary judgment. 

3. This action is not a class action nor has a receiver been appointed. 

Case 3:07-cv-02823-MJJ Document 17 Filed 10/15/07 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Order Voluntary Dismissal 

Order_07-10-15.fi.doc Page 2 of 2 

CASE NO.: C07-2823 MJJ

4. It is ordered that this action is dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

Dated: ___________________________ 

_____________________________________ 

Judge Martin J. Jenkins 

October 15, 2007

Case 3:07-cv-02823-MJJ Document 17 Filed 10/15/07 Page 4 of 4