Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00865/USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-00865-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESTHER COHN, 

Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-00865 MCE KJN PS

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

BANK OF AMERICA, 

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel and has not paid the fee ordinarily

required to file an action in this court, previously filed an incomplete application to proceed in

forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (See Dkt. No. 2). Because the incomplete

application prevented the court from properly evaluating whether plaintiff should be granted

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the undersigned granted plaintiff twenty-one days within

which to either: (1) file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, or (2) file the

appropriate initial filing fee of $350.00. (Order, Dkt. No. 3, May 10, 2010.) Plaintiff did not

submit a completed application or the appropriate initial filing fee. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied; and 

2. Plaintiff be provided twenty-one days within which to pay the initial filing

Case 2:10-cv-00865-MCE -KJN Document 4 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

fee of $350.00. Failure to timely pay the filing fee will result in a recommendation that this

matter be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Id.; see also Local Rule 304(b). Such a

document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: June 14, 2010

_____________________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-00865-MCE -KJN Document 4 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 2