Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-02590/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-02590-59/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TRANSPERFECT GLOBAL, INC., 

TRANSPERFECT TRANSLATIONS 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., and 

TRANSLATIONS.COM, INC., 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

 v. 

MOTIONPOINT CORP., 

 Defendant. 

________________________________/ 

No. C 10-2590 CW 

ORDER FOR FURTHER 

BRIEFING ON 

CONTEMPT MOTION 

(Docket No. 578) 

 

On April 2, 2015, the Court held a hearing on TransPerfect's 

Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why MotionPoint Should Not be 

Held in Contempt for Violating the Permanent Injunction 

Prohibiting Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,857,022. The Court 

ordered the parties to meet and confer to determine a schedule for 

exchanging information and to set a briefing schedule to address 

new issues raised. The parties have not reported any agreement. 

Therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS MotionPoint to submit 

within two weeks of the date of this order: (1)records 

demonstrating compliance monitoring, discovered instances of noncompliance, and steps taken to fix instances of non-compliance; 

(2) a declaration or other evidence supporting the contention that 

its design-around is controlled and implemented by MotionPoint 

only and not by its customers; (3) a detailed plan to prevent noncompliance due to technical errors and the disabling of 

JavaScript. 

Case 4:10-cv-02590-CW Document 597 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Within two weeks of the date of MotionPoint's submission, 

TransPerfect shall submit a brief no longer than ten pages 

addressing any new issues raised by the submission and proposing a 

remedy that is proportional to the alleged violation. 

TransPerfect shall also attach itemized billing records to support 

the amount of its request for attorneys' fees and costs. 

Defendant may file a response of ten pages or less two weeks 

thereafter. Plaintiff may file a reply of up to five pages within 

seven days thereafter. The matter will be decided on the papers 

unless a hearing is set by the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 04/16/2015 

CLAUDIA WILKEN 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:10-cv-02590-CW Document 597 Filed 04/16/15 Page 2 of 2