Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00671/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-00671-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Sealing Documents Submitted For In Camera Review - Case No. C 09-0671 CRB

Horace W. Green (SBN 115699)

C. Mark Humbert (SBN 111093)

GREEN & HUMBERT

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 1418

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 837-5433

Facsimile: (415) 837-0127 

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN ARNOLD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 09-0671 CRB

[proposed] ORDER SEALING 

DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR IN 

CAMERA REVIEW BY THE COURT

Case3:09-cv-00671-CRB Document42-2 Filed03/02/10 Page1 of 2 Case 3:09-cv-00671-CRB Document 44 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Sealing Documents Submitted for In Camera Review - Case No. C 09-0671 CRB 2

Having reviewed Defendants’ Motion to File Documents under Seal, and good 

cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that the documents submitted remain sealed until such time as the Court completes 

its in camera inspection. Upon completion of the Court’s review, and filing of the Court’s 

ruling on the privilege issues, the documents shall be returned to counsel for Defendants 

and shall not remain in the Court’s files.

Dated: ___________________________

Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

Case3:09-cv-00671-CRB Document42-2 Filed03/02/10 Page2 of 2

March 9, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-00671-CRB Document 44 Filed 03/09/10 Page 2 of 2