Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-01846/USCOURTS-cand-5_11-cv-01846-438/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1

Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER AND ORDER PARTIALLY DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

APPLE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK 

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER AND 

ORDER PARTIALLY DENYING 

MOTION TO STRIKE 

Dkt. No. 3335

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Harold McElhinny, Rachel Krevans, William Lee, Mark Selwyn, 

Erik Olson, and Nathan Sabri

Defendants’ Attorneys: Victoria Maroulis, Carl Anderson, and Sara Jenkins

MOTIONS TO STRIKE

On February 10, 2016, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part both 

Apple’s and Samsung’s Motions to Strike Portions of Updated Expert Reports on Damages. ECF 

No. 3380. 

The Court held a hearing on February 11, 2016 on the sole issue remaining. Having 

considered the parties’ submissions and arguments, the relevant case law, and the record, and 

balancing the factors set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court DENIED Samsung’s 

motion to strike the new per product/per patent exhibits in the damages report of Apple’s expert, 

Julie L. Davis.

Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3389 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 3
2

Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER AND ORDER PARTIALLY DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The Court also made the following rulings during the hearing:

EXPERT REPORTS

Apple shall revise Davis’s per product/per patent exhibits to incorporate the clarifying 

changes discussed at the hearing. Apple shall serve revised exhibits on Samsung by February 12, 

2016. After meeting and conferring with Samsung, Apple shall file revised exhibits by February 

18, 2016.

Samsung’s damages expert, Michael Wagner, may revise his trial exhibits (or, if necessary,

briefly supplement his report) to present his opinions on a per product/per patent basis. Samsung 

shall provide any such revisions to Apple by February 16, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. Apple may take a 

one-hour deposition of Wagner, if necessary, on February 17, 2016.

The parties shall revise their November 2015 expert reports consistent with the Court’s 

rulings on the parties’ motions to strike. By February 26, 2016, the parties shall deliver to the 

Court two hardcopies each of both clean versions of the revised expert reports and redlined 

versions showing the changes made to the experts’ reports. The parties shall additionally e-mail

PDF copies of the clean and redlined versions of the revised expert reports to the Court’s 

Courtroom Deputy.

PRE-TRIAL MATERIALS

Samsung shall file a revised witness list indicating which witnesses Samsung will call and 

which witnesses Samsung may call by February 16, 2016.

The parties shall jointly submit a proposed per product/per patent verdict form by February 

18, 2016, and joint proposed preliminary jury instructions and joint proposed final jury 

instructions by February 19, 2016. The joint filings shall identify areas of agreement and 

disagreement and provide justifications for competing proposals.

The parties’ motions in limine are currently due on February 18, 2016. Although the Court 

expects to resolve most of the parties’ motions in limine on the briefs, the Court shall select two

issues for oral argument by newer attorneys at the Pretrial Conference on March 3, 2016. As 

agreed by the parties, by February 25, 2016, the Court shall issue an order designating one motion 

to be argued by an attorney 7 or fewer years out of law school, and a second motion to be argued 

by an attorney 5 or fewer years out of law school. 

OTHER SCHEDULING

The hearing on Apple’s Motion for Supplemental Damages and Prejudgment Interest, ECF 

No. 3339, currently scheduled for March 24, 2016, at 1:30 p.m., is continued to April 14, 2016, at 

1:30 p.m.

Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3389 Filed 02/11/16 Page 2 of 3
3

Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER AND ORDER PARTIALLY DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The revised case schedule is as follows:

Scheduled Event Date

Joint Proposed Verdict Form February 18, 2016

Proposed Preliminary Jury Instructions and 

Proposed Final Jury Instructions

February 19, 2016

Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motion to 

Introduce New Evidence

March 3, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.

Trial Dates March 28, 29, 30, and 31, 2016 and 

April 1,4, and 5, 2016

Hearing on Supplemental Damages April 14, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.

Post-trial Motions Opening briefs: April 21, 2016

Opposition briefs: May 5, 2016

Reply briefs: May 12, 2016

Hearing on Post-trial Motions June 2, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2016

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document 3389 Filed 02/11/16 Page 3 of 3