Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-arwd-4_05-cv-04064/USCOURTS-arwd-4_05-cv-04064-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

JEAN C. McKELROY PLAINTIFF

VS. CASE NO. 05-4064

CAMDEN MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC.,

et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

Currently before the Court are Defendants Sunrise Medical,

Inc.’s and Sunrise Medical, HHG, Inc.’s Motions to Quash Notice of

Deposition Duces Tecum of the Corporate Designee and Motions for

Protective Orders (Docs. 47, 49). The Court, being well and

sufficiently advised, finds that the motions should be GRANTED IN

PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court finds and orders as follows

with respect thereto:

1. To the extent the motions seek to quash the notice of

deposition, the motions are DENIED AS MOOT, as plaintiff states in

her response to the motions that the notices will be withdrawn and

that the deposition will be rescheduled to a date agreeable to all

counsel. 

2. In the motions, defendants also seek a protective order

directing that the deposition of the corporate designee be taken by

telephone or other electronic means. Plaintiff states that this

may be a viable option, depending upon whether it will be necessary

to present the walker at issue to the corporate designee and have

him answer questions about it. Defendants’ motions are GRANTED to

Case 4:05-cv-04064-JLH Document 57 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
the extent that a protective order is hereby entered requiring the

deposition of the corporate designee to be taken by telephone or

other electronic means. Should plaintiff thereafter believe that

it is necessary to further depose the designee in person, he may

file a motion seeking relief from the protective order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12 day of January 2006. th

/S/JIMM LARRY HENDREN 

JIMM LARRY HENDREN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 4:05-cv-04064-JLH Document 57 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>