Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01653/USCOURTS-caed-2_11-cv-01653-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights

---

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY DISCOVERY DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER 

100338 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BRUCE A. KILDAY, ESQ., SB No. 066415 

 Email: bkilday@akk-law.com 

CARRIE A. FREDERICKSON, ESQ., SB No. 245199 

 Email: cfrederickson@akk-law.com

LANCE M. MARTIN, ESQ., SB No. 294457 

 Email: lmartin@akk-law.com

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

601 University Avenue, Suite 150 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Telephone: (916) 564-6100 

Telecopier: (916) 564-6263 

Attorneys for Defendants THE CITY OF ANDERSON (also sued herein as THE CITY OF 

ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT); CHIEF DALE WEBB 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KATRINA HAUGHT, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

THE CITY OF ANDERSON, et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 11-cv-01653-JAM-CMK 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

MODIFY DISCOVERY DATES IN 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

The parties have reached a tentative settlement of this case and ask to modify the dates 

pertaining to discovery in the Scheduling Order pending final approval of the settlement. 

Plaintiff, KATRINA HAUGHT, and Defendants, THE CITY OF ANDERSON and 

CHIEF DALE WEBB, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to, and 

respectfully request, the Court enter an Order modifying the Scheduling Order as it relates to 

discovery deadlines and the filing of the dispositive motions. 

WHEREAS: 

1. The parties participated in a second mediation session on November 16, 2015, 

with a neutral mediator. 

Case 2:11-cv-01653-JAM-CMK Document 94 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 3
-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY DISCOVERY DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER 

100338 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. After approximately nine hours, the parties reached an agreement to resolve the 

entire litigation, which will result in the filing of a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice. 

3. A portion of the settlement must be approved by the Board of the California Joint 

Powers Risk Management Association (CJPRMA) at their general meeting on December 17, 

2015. The General Manager and Risk Manager of CJPRMA, along with the attorney for the 

Defendants, have all agreed to strongly recommend approval of the settlement agreement that 

was reached on November 16, 2015, and all are optimistic that the Board will approve it. 

4. One of the motivating factors for both parties is a desire to stop incurring 

attorney’s fees and costs. The current Scheduling Order would require significant fees and costs 

to be incurred before the Board is able to meet. These costs include revision of a dispositive 

motion and discovery, including experts. 

5. The parties believe that a small modification of the Scheduling Order will allow 

the parties to avoid incurring additional fees and costs pending approval by the Board, without 

any change to the existing dates for the Pre-Trial Conference and Trial. 

Therefore, the parties, and each of them, submit that good cause exists pursuant to 

F.R.C.P. § 16 to modify the Scheduling Order so that discovery, including expert witnesses, must 

be completed by January 4, 2016, and dispositive motions must be filed by January 12, 2016. 

The parties do not request any modification of the final pre-trial conference (set for March 11, 

2016 at 10:00 a.m.) or the trial (set for May 9, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.) 

Dated: 11/19/15 BARR & MUDFORD, LLP 

 

 /s/ John Douglas Barr 

[as authorized on 11/19/15] 

By:_________________________________ 

 JOHN DOUGLAS BARR 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: 11/19/15 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP 

 

/s/ Bruce A. Kilday 

By:_________________________________ 

 BRUCE A. KILDAY 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 2:11-cv-01653-JAM-CMK Document 94 Filed 11/20/15 Page 2 of 3
-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY DISCOVERY DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER 

100338 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Scheduling Order is modified so that discovery, 

including discovery related to experts, must be completed by January 4, 2016, and dispositive 

motions must be filed by January 12, 2016. 

Dated: 11/19/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________ 

 JOHN A. MENDEZ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:11-cv-01653-JAM-CMK Document 94 Filed 11/20/15 Page 3 of 3