Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_93-cv-00277/USCOURTS-cand-5_93-cv-00277-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 535
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

CURTIS FLOYD PRICE,

Petitioner,

 vs.

RON DAVIS, Acting Warden of San

Quentin State Prison

Respondent. /

No. C 93-277 PJH 

Death Penalty Case

SCHEDULING ORDER

On November 24, 2014, the Court directed the parties to:

1. Meet and confer to identify which claims they agree may be resolved based

on the record before the Court. Within fifteen (15) days of meeting and conferring, the

parties shall file a joint statement outlining a litigation schedule for briefing the merits of

record-based claims. 

2. If the parties determine that none of the claims are record-based, the parties

will set forth a schedule for addressing why the Supreme Court of California’s denial of

petitioner’s claims was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly

established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States” or

“resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in

light of the evidence presented in the State Court proceedings.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). 

// 

Case 5:93-cv-00277-EJD Document 224 Filed 04/08/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 That order did not set a deadline for submission of the litigation schedule and the

parties have yet to submit a proposed schedule. The parties are hereby ORDERED to

submit their proposed litigation schedule within 30 days of the filing date of this order and in

accordance with the dictates of the November 24, 2014 order. If the parties fail to comply

with this order, the court will impose a litigation schedule without the input of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 8, 2015. 

 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 5:93-cv-00277-EJD Document 224 Filed 04/08/15 Page 2 of 2