Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00044/USCOURTS-azd-2_06-cv-00044-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jim Langan,

Plaintiff,

v.

Town of Cave Creek,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-06-0044-PHX-SMM

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines.

(Dkt. 39.) Currently pending in the present case is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment

and Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. See dkts. 16, 35. The parties request

the current Rule 16 Scheduling Order (dkt. 30) “be stayed” until the Court issues a ruling on

both motions for summary judgment. Although the Court disagrees with the parties that the

Scheduling Order should “be stayed,” it will grant the requested discovery extensions and,

in addition, continue the dispositive motions and final pretrial conference dates.

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING the parties’ Stipulation to Extend

Discovery Deadlines. (Dkt. 39.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED VACATING THE DEADLINES set forth in the

Rule 16 Scheduling Order issued on December 22, 2006. See Dkt. 30.

Case 2:06-cv-00044-SMM Document 42 Filed 03/02/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that disclosure of Plaintiff’s Federal Rules of

Evidence 701, 702, 703, and 705 witnesses are due 30 days after this Court’s decision on

both pending motions for summary judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that disclosure of Defendant’s Federal Rules of

Evidence 701, 702, 703, and 705 witnesses are due 60 days after this Court’s decision on

both pending motions for summary judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that disclosure of any rebuttal expert witnesses are

due 90 days after this Court’s decision on both pending motions for summary judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all discovery responses are due no later than 110

days after this Court’s decision on both pending motions for summary judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all dispositive motions shall be filed no later than

140 days after this Court’s decision on both pending motions for summary judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if no dispositive motions are pending after the

dispositive motions deadline has expired, Plaintiff’s counsel shall notify the Court that the

parties are ready for a Final Pretrial Conference. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, except with respect to the deadlines set forth

therein, all of the provisions in the Court’s Rule 16 Scheduling Order (see dkt. 30) remain

binding and valid on both parties.

DATED this 1st day of March, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00044-SMM Document 42 Filed 03/02/07 Page 2 of 2