Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07657/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07657-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

---

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RELATE AND CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS 

Case No. 06-07657 SI 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Eric A. Grover, Esq. (SBN 136080) 

Jade Butman, Esq. (SBN 235920) 

KELLER GROVER LLP 

425 Second Street, Suite 500 

San Francisco, CA 94107 

Tel. (415) 543-1305; Fax: (415) 543-7861 

eagrover@kellergrover.com 

jbutman@kellergrover.com

Mark R. Thierman, Esq. (SBN 72913) 

THIERMAN LAW FIRM 

7287 Lakeside Drive 

Reno, Nevada 89511 

Tel. (775) 284-1500; Fax (775) 703-5027 

laborlawyer@pacbell.net 

Scott A. Miller, Esq. (SBN 230322) Steven L. Miller, Esq. (SBN 106023) 

LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT A. STEVEN L. MILLER, 

MILLER, A.P.C. A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORP. 

16133 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1200 16133 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1200 

Encino, CA 91436 Encino, CA 91436 

Tel. (818) 788-8081; Fax (818) 788-8080 Tel. (818) 986-8900 Fax: (818) 990-7900 

millaw@sbcglobal.net stevenlmiller@sbcglobal.net 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Farah Payan 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JIYOUNG MOON and CRAIG STANFORD, 

individually and on behalf of all other 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

 

FEDEX KINKO’S OFFICE AND PRINT 

SERVICES, INC. and DOES 1-10, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: CV 06-07657 SI 

CLASS ACTION 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER THAT CASES ARE 

RELATED AND CONSOLIDATED

Case 3:06-cv-07657-SI Document 45 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 1 of 4 Case 3:06-cv-07657-SI Document 48 Filed 08/15/07 Page 1 of 4
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RELATE AND CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS 

Case No. 06-07657 SI 

1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Plaintiff FARAH PAYAN (“Plaintiff Payan”), Plaintiffs Jiyoung Moon and 

Craig Stanford (“Plaintiffs Moon and Stanford”) and Defendant FEDEX KINKO’S 

OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES, INC. (“Defendant” or “FedEx Kinko’s”), by and 

through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, on December 20, 2006, Plaintiffs Moon and Stanford filed a First 

Amended Complaint in Moon, et al. v. FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc., 

Case No. 06-07657 SI in this Court on behalf of a putative national class of FedEx 

Kinko’s customers alleging that Defendant willfully violated the requirements of 15 

U.S.C. § 1681c(g) by providing Plaintiffs Moon and Stanford and the putative class 

members with credit or debit card receipts that allegedly contained more than five digits 

of the credit or debit card numbers and/or the cards’ expiration dates; 

WHEREAS, on February 9, 2007, Plaintiff Payan filed Payan v. FedEx Kinko’s 

Office and Print Services, Inc. in the Central District of California on behalf of the 

essentially the same putative class as in the Moon action alleging substantially the same 

factual and legal claims against the same Defendant; 

WHEREAS, on July 2, 2007, the Central District Court approved Plaintiff Payan 

and Defendant’s stipulation to transfer the case to the Northern District Court so that it 

could be joined with the Moon action; 

WHEREAS, the Payan action was transferred and assigned to Magistrate Judge 

Edward M. Chen in the Northern District, designated as Case No. 3:07-cv-03594-EMC; 

WHEREAS, both actions involve substantially the same factual and legal claims 

regarding the same defendant’s receipt printing practices and propose essentially the 

same putative classes of plaintiff consumers; 

WHEREAS, litigating these actions separately will create unduly burdensome 

duplication of labor and expense both for the parties and the Courts; 

WHEREAS, litigating these actions separately will create a significant risk of 

inconsistent rulings because both Courts will be resolving essentially the same issues; 

Case 3:06-cv-07657-SI Document 45 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 2 of 4 Case 3:06-cv-07657-SI Document 48 Filed 08/15/07 Page 2 of 4
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RELATE AND CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS 

Case No. 06-07657 SI 

2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties referenced below, by 

and through their respective counsel, that the actions, Payan v. FedEx Kinko’s Office and 

Print Services, Inc., Case No. 07-03594 EMC and Moon, et al. v. FedEx Kinko’s Office 

and Print Services, Inc., Case No. 06-07657 SI are related under the definition set forth 

in Local Rule 3-12(a) and should be consolidated into the earlier-filed Moon action in 

accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a). 

Dated: August 1, 2007 KELLER GROVER LLP 

 

 By: /s/ 

 Eric A. Grover 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 FARAH PAYAN 

Dated: August 1, 2007 SPIRO MOSS & BARNESS LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 J. Mark Moore 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 JIYOUNG MOON and CRAIG STANFORD 

Dated: August 1, 2007 SEDGWICK DETERT MORAN & ARNOLD LLP

 

 By: /s/ 

 Michael N. Westheimer 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 FEDEX KINKO’S OFFICE AND 

 PRINT SERVICES, INC. 

Case 3:06-cv-07657-SI Document 45 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 3 of 4 Case 3:06-cv-07657-SI Document 48 Filed 08/15/07 Page 3 of 4
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RELATE AND CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS 

Case No. 06-07657 SI 

1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ORDER

 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, the Court hereby orders that the 

actions Moon, et al. v. FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc., Case No. 06-

07657 SI and Payan v. FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc., Case No. 07-

03594 EMC are related and are hereby consolidated into the earlier-filed Moon, et al. 

v. FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc., Case No. 06-07657 SI. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _________, 2007 ____________________________ 

HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-07657-SI Document 45 Filed 08/01/2007 Page 4 of 4 Case 3:06-cv-07657-SI Document 48 Filed 08/15/07 Page 4 of 4