Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03078/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-03078-14/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA SERVICE EMPLOYEES

HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND,

et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ADVANCE BUILDING

MAINTENANCE,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C06-3078 CW (BZ)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION

AND RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiffs’ September 18, 2007 request for clarification

and reconsideration of my September 7, 2007 Order is DENIED. 

Insofar as the request constitutes a motion for

reconsideration, such a motion is inappropriate. See

Commentary to Civil Local Rule 7-9(a). Insofar as plaintiff

questions the level of confidentiality to be accorded the

protectable information, the parties’ stipulated protective

order makes clear that the designation controls, and how the

designation can be challenged. I made no findings as to how

confidential the information is - only that it is subject to a

sealing order. My order does not foreclose a challenge to

Case 4:06-cv-03078-CW Document 178 Filed 09/19/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

defendant’s designation once such designation is perfected. 

Dated: September 19, 2007

Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\CA.SERVICE EMPLOYEES\ORDER.DENY.MOT.RECONSIDER.wpd

Case 4:06-cv-03078-CW Document 178 Filed 09/19/07 Page 2 of 2