Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02292/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02292-34/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN M PERRY, SANDRA B STIER,

PAUL T KATAMI and JEFFREY J

ZARRILLO,

Plaintiffs,

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his

official capacity as governor of

California; EDMUND G BROWN JR, in

his official capacity as attorney

general of California; MARK B

HORTON, in his official capacity

as director of the California

Department of Public Health and

state registrar of vital

statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her

official capacity as deputy

director of health information &

strategic planning for the

California Department of Public

Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his

official capacity as clerkrecorder of the County of

Alameda; and DEAN C LOGAN, in his

official capacity as registrarrecorder/county clerk for the

County of Los Angeles, 

Defendants,

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J

KNIGHT, MARTIN F GUTIERREZ,

HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A

JANSSON and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM –

YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF

CALIOFORNIA RENEWAL, as official

proponents of Proposition 8,

Defendant-Intervenors. /

No C 09-2292 VRW

ORDER

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 589 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Both Equality California and No on Proposition 8,

Campaign for Marriage Equality, A Project of the American Civil

Liberties Union (the “ACLU”) shall, separately and not later than

February 22, 2010, serve and file a declaration identifying the

core group of individuals “engaged in the formulation of campaign

strategy and messaging.” Perry v Hollingsworth, -- F3d --, No 09-

17241 Slip op at 36 n 12 (9th Cir January 4, 2010). Each

organization’s declaration shall identify only those individuals

who were involved in that organization’s campaign; the declarations

should not include individuals or entities from other

organizations.

Equality California, the ACLU, Californians Against

Eliminating Basic Rights and the proponents should be prepared to

discuss the scope of the non-parties’ First Amendment privilege at

the hearing scheduled for February 25, 2010 at 2:30 PM.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

JOSEPH C SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 589 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2