Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-00751/USCOURTS-cand-4_14-cv-00751-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE ROE,

Plaintiff,

v.

FRITO-LAY, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-00751-HSG (KAW)

ORDER TERMINATING MOTION FOR 

SANCTIONS

Re: Dkt. No. 86

On April 28, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions against Frito Lay for an alleged 

violation of a prior court order. (Dkt. No. 86.) On May 11, 2016, the parties filed a notice of

settlement., so the undersigned vacated the June 2, 2016 hearing on the motion for sanctions and 

ordered Plaintiff to either file a notice of withdrawal or renotice the motion following the 

upcoming case management conference. (Dkt. Nos. 93 & 98.) Plaintiff did neither. On August 5, 

2016, the district court granted the motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement. 

(Dkt. No. 103.)

Accordingly, the Court terminates the pending motion for sanctions. Should Plaintiff 

decide to pursue the sanctions motion, she may renotice it.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2016

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:14-cv-00751-HSG Document 104 Filed 08/09/16 Page 1 of 1