Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02937/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-02937-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 430
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 12:1971 Relief under Bank Holding Act

---

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES

SHOULD BE RELATED; CASE NO. 3:14-CV-04533-JSC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MAYER BROWN LLP

ANDREW Z. EDELSTEIN (SBN 218023)

adelstein@mayerbrown.com

350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503

Telephone: (213) 229-9500

Facsimile: (213) 625-0248

DEBRA BOGO-ERNST (pro hac to be filed)

dernst@mayerbrown.com

MATTHEW C. SOSTRIN (pro hac to be filed)

msostrin@mayerbrown.com

71 S. Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60606

Telephone: (312) 782-0600

Facsimile: (312) 701-7711

Attorneys for Defendants

CITIBANK, N.A. AND CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO

MARCI PATERA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITIBANK, N.A., a national association, and

CITIMORTGAGE, INC., a corporation, and

DOES 1-25,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:14-cv-04533-JSC

Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS CITIBANK, N.A. AND

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

CONSIDER WHETHER CASES

SHOULD BE RELATED

[Civil L.R. 3-3(c) & 3-12(b)]

Case 3:16-cv-02937-VC Document 28 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 2
-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES

SHOULD BE RELATED; CASE NO. 3:14-CV-04533-JSC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

This matter coming to be heard on Defendants Citibank, N.A. and CitiMortgage, Inc.’s

Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related, due and proper notice

having been given to all parties in interest, and the Court being fully advised of the premises,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related

is GRANTED.

2. Patera v. Citibank, N.A., Case No. 3:16-cv-2937-SK (“Patera II”), which was

assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim, is deemed related to Patera v. Citibank, N.A., Case No.

3:14-cv-04544-JSC (“Patera I”).

3. The Clerk is directed to transfer Patera II to the undersigned.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July __, 2016

______________________________

Jacqueline Scott Corley, Magistrate Judge

United States District Court

August 3, 2016 _____________________________

acqueline Scott Corley, Magistrate Jud

Case 3:16-cv-02937-VC Document 28 Filed 08/03/16 Page 2 of 2