Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01011/USCOURTS-azd-2_07-cv-01011-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Earl V. Nelson, 

Petitioner,

vs.

Dora B. Schriro, et al.,

Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-1011-PHX-PGR (ECV)

 

 ORDER

Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Voss notwithstanding that no party has filed any objection to the Report

and Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly

determined that this habeas action must be dismissed as untimely under 28

U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A) because the petitioner filed this action nearly six years

after the applicable limitations period expired. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

(doc. #11) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus by a Person in State Custody Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied and

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:07-cv-01011-PGR Document 12 Filed 10/24/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

- 2 -

that this action is dismissed with prejudice as time-barred.

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2008.

Case 2:07-cv-01011-PGR Document 12 Filed 10/24/08 Page 2 of 2