Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_17-cv-00817/USCOURTS-caed-1_17-cv-00817-23/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL JORGENSON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

RICHARD B. HAAK, M.D., et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 1:17-cv-00817-NONE-EPG (PC)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR OBJECTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED 

TIMELY

(ECF NO. 107)

Paul Jorgenson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this action. 

On February 6, 2020,1 Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations 

dated December 9, 2019, and November 20, 2019, along with a motion requesting that the 

objections be considered timely filed. (ECF No. 107). Plaintiff admits that he did not timely 

file his objections, but asks that they be considered timely “on equitable tolling grounds.” (Id.).

///

///

///

 

1 Plaintiff’s motion is dated December 3, 2019. (ECF No. 107, p. 8). Plaintiff also certifies that he 

mailed a copy of the motion to the parties and the Court on December 3, 2019. (Id. at 8-9). However, this is 

patently false. One of the findings and recommendations that Plaintiff is objecting to is dated December 9, 2019, 

which is six days after Plaintiff supposedly served his objections. Plaintiff is advised that misrepresenting facts to 

the Court may lead to sanctions, up to and including the dismissal of his case.

Case 1:17-cv-00817-DAD-EPG Document 108 Filed 02/10/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

As the findings and recommendations have already been adopted (ECF Nos. 104 & 

105), IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2020 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:17-cv-00817-DAD-EPG Document 108 Filed 02/10/20 Page 2 of 2