Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03130/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03130-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD EARL TARVER III,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SANDIA CORP.; JAMES WANG; AND

DOES 1–20,

Defendants. /

No. C 06-03130 WHA

ORDER RE SELECTING ADR

PROCESS

Plaintiff Edward Earl Tarver III and at least one defendant request referral to private

alternative dispute resolution without identifying the process or provider. They also ask that the

Court not require a deadline for the ADR session. They want to defer these issues until after

certain discovery. The requests are DENIED. The parties should resubmit the stipulation and

proposed order, naming the provider, identifying the process and requesting a deadline. See

Order Setting Initial Case Mgmt. Conference & ADR Deadlines; Civil L. R. 16-8(c); ADR L.R.

3-5(c). The stipulation to ADR process was due July 21, 2006. The parties should submit the

corrected stipulation and proposed order by NOON, TUESDAY, AUGUST 1, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 28, 2006 WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-03130-WHA Document 18 Filed 07/28/06 Page 1 of 1