Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04328/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-04328-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:553 Communications Act of 1994

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL RIGHETTI,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED SHUTTLE ALLIANCE 

TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 13-cv-04328-JST 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

DEFENDANT TAKE YOU ON 

VACATION, LLC SHOULD NOT BE 

DISMISSED

The Court has reviewed the case management statement filed by Plaintiff Michael Righetti 

in advance of the Case Management Conference scheduled for July 1, 2015. ECF No. 61. 

Plaintiff states that he has obtained a default judgment against defendant United Shuttle Alliance 

Transportation Corporation, and that he is pursuing his remedies against remaining defendant and 

dissolved limited liability company Take You On Vacation, LLC pursuant to Florida Revised 

Statutes § 605.0711. Id.

Section 605.0711 describes a process by which Plaintiff will give notice of its claim to 

Take You On Vacation, and Take You On Vacation will then make an offer of compensation to 

Plaintiff. If Take You On Vacation does not comply with its statutory obligations, or Plaintiff 

does not like Take You On Vacation’s offer, any remedy lies in the “circuit court in the applicable 

county” in Florida state court. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 605.0711 (West).

It seems that this Court has no role to play in the adjudication of claims under section 

605.0711. Indeed, Plaintiff acknowledges as much in his case management statement, when he 

states that “no further action [in this case] is required by this Court.” ECF No. 61 at 2. 

Because the Court cannot take any further action regarding Take You On Vacation, 

Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not dismiss that entity without 

Case 3:13-cv-04328-JST Document 62 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

prejudice and close the file of this case. A response to this order is due by July 10, 2015, at which 

time the Court will take the matter under submission. If no response is filed, the Court will 

dismiss Take You On Vacation without prejudice and close the file. 

The case management conference scheduled for July 1, 2015 is vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 28, 2015

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:13-cv-04328-JST Document 62 Filed 06/29/15 Page 2 of 2