Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05660/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-05660-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

t-ILt:U 

Document 464 Filed 01/25/10 

JAN 252010 .--___ ...;;;C...;;,;a..;;.,;se;;.,...3;;.,;.:..;;.,;09;;.,...-,md-02100-DRH-PMF 

A CERTIFIED TRUE COpy 

ATTEST 

By Tarrell L. littleton on Jan 25, 2010 

FOR THE UNITED STATES 

JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTlOISTR1CT LITIGATION 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EAST ST. LOUIS OFFICE 

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL 

on 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION 

IN RE: YASMIN AND Y AZ (DROSPIRENONE) 

MARKETING, SALES P·RACTICES AND 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) 

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-ll) 

Page 1 of 3 

UNITED STATES 

JUDICIAL PANEL ON 

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION 

Jan 08,2010 

FILED 

CLERK'S OFFICE 

MDLNo.2100 

On October 1,2009, the Panel transferred 32 civil actions to the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 

U .S.C. § 1407. See _F .Supp.2d_ (l.P .M.L. 2009). Since that time, 169 additional actions have 

been transferred to the Southern District oflllinois. With the consent of that court, all such actions 

have been assigned to the Honorable David R. Herndon. 

It appears that the actions on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are 

common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of Illinois and assigned to 

Judge Herndon. 

Pursuant to Rule 7.4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 199 

F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), these actions are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern 

District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of October 1,2009, and, with the consent of that 

court, assigned to the Honorable David R. Herndon. 

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States 

District Court for the Southern District oflllinois. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall 

be stayed 14 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of 

the Panel within this 14-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. 

Inasmuch as no objecllon is 

pendlng al this lime. the 

stay is lifted. 

I Jan 251 2010 I 

CLERK'S OFFICE 

IH'nO STATES 

JUPiClAI. I'o\NEI,. ON 

MUL TIllSTRICT LITIGATION 

FOR THE PANEL: 

e~0\ll 

Clerk of the Panel 

Case 3:09-cv-05660-BZ Document 4 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF Document 464 Filed 01/25/10 Page 2 of 3 

Page 10f2 

IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) 

MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 

SCHEDULE CTO-ll- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS 

CASE CAPTION 

MDLNo.2100 

ALABAMA NORTHERN 

ALN 2 09-2476 PennySimpsonv. Bayer Corp., etal. /0- 8-004lo 

CALIFORNIA CENTRAL 

GAG 2 09 9154 Rifl:ey Afl:6fewS 'I. Bayer Gefl'., et al. Opposed 1/13/10 

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN 

CAN 3 09-5660 Mary R. Prelle v. Bayer Corp., et al. 10 - ~ 00 tf 1 

CAN 3 09-5708 Roxanne Foster v. Bayer Corp., et al. 10 - J 00 Y 8 

CAN 3 09-5710 Elizabeth Heyne v. McKesson Corp., et al. 10 - ~ 00 Ii q 

GAN 3 09 5902 Lelt:eeia G. MilllHl 'I. Bttyef Gefl'., et al. Opposed 1/11110 

CAN 3 09-5906 Mary Rasmussen v. McKesson Corp, et al. I [) - J.O 0 50 

COLORADO 

CO 1 09-2869 

CO 1 09-2880 

FLORIDA SOUTHERN 

FLS 9 09-82441 

HAWAII 

HI 1 09-595 

lOW A NORTHERN 

IAN 1 09-188 

ILLINOIS NORTHERN 

ILN I 09-7827 

MINNESOTA 

MN 0 09-3556 

MN 0 09-3652 

MN 0 09-3653 

MN 0 09-3654 

MN 0 09-3655 

MN 0 09-3656 

MN 0 09-3657 

MN 0 09-3658 

MN 0 09-3659 

Keeli Anthony v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Michele Lambert, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Jodi S. Com v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Bonnie Horibata, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Adrienne Cechura, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Lacey Dawn Angel v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Peggy Cruz v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Christie Johnson v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Maricela Jacobson v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Michelle Nielsen v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Linda Smith v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

JoAnna Milius v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Holly Fulkerson v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Ty1a Cornell v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

Melissa Collier v. Bayer Corp., et al. 

IO-J.OOS\ 

10- joo!5l. 

10- ~oD53 

IO-aoOS~ 

10- ~oo&5 

10- c1oo51 

10- Q.oo 58 

10 - {loo Sq 

10- Q.ool.J;O 

10- .1oolal 

10- cloot&.:)..., 

10 - ~oo<o:, 

10- 9..00(04-

10 - {ioa lD5 

Case 3:09-cv-05660-BZ Document 4 Filed 02/03/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF Document 464 Filed 01/25/10 Page 3 of 3 

Page 2 of2 

MDL No. 2100 - Schedule CTO-ll Tag-Along Actions (Continued) 

DIST. DIV. CA. # CASE CAPTION 

NEW JERSEY 

NJ 2 09-6201 Adelina Olsen v. Bayer Corp., et al. lo-~OOlolo 

NEW YORK SOUTHERN 

NYSI 09-10205 Sandi Cash, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. \O-~oo£o/l 

OHIO NORTHERN 

OHN 1 09-2788 Camellia Stapley, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. 10 -loolPg 

TENNESSEE EASTERN 

TNE 1 09-307 Melissa Wallace v. Bayer Corp., et al. 10 -loO toq 

UTAH 

UT 1 09-182 Dustin Francis, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. 10- ~oo10 

Case 3:09-cv-05660-BZ Document 4 Filed 02/03/10 Page 3 of 3