Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02054/USCOURTS-cand-3_09-cv-02054-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

*E-Filed 05/04/2010*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENCE CLUB, 

INC., et al. 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

HENRY A. AMADO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 09-2054 RS 

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR DENIAL 

OR CONTINUANCE OF PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT 

 

 On May 04, 2010, defendants filed a document entitled “Defendants’ FRCP 56(f) Motion 

For Denial or Continuance of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment.” Plaintiff’s motion for 

summary judgment is scheduled for hearing on May 27, 2010. Defendants’ opposition papers are 

due on May 06, 2010; they contend that a meaningful response to two claims plaintiffs advance in 

their motion depends on receipt of certain outstanding discovery. Defendants shall file any 

substantive opposition on the merits that they may have, based on the information they presently 

possess by the May 06 deadline. Defendants shall include further explanation in the opposition 

papers as to why and how the specific outstanding discovery would create a genuine issue of 

material fact. 

Case 3:09-cv-02054-RS Document 77 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

Dated: 05/04/2010 

 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:09-cv-02054-RS Document 77 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 2