Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02233/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02233-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C05-02233 CRB

2754361_1.DOC 

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838 

nlocker@wsgr.com 

STEVEN D. GUGGENHEIM, State Bar No. 201386 

sguggenheim@wsgr.com

CAZ HASHEMI, State Bar No. 210239 

chashemi@wsgr.com 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

IN RE BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 

This Document Relates to: 

 ALL ACTIONS 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Lead Civil Action No. C05-02233 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Date: December 2, 2005 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Before: Hon. Charles R. Breyer 

Case 3:05-cv-02233-CRB Document 55 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C05-02233 CRB

-1- 2754361_1.DOC 

WHEREAS, the parties are currently discussing whether ADR is appropriate at this stage 

of the litigation; 

WHEREAS, the parties desire additional time for these discussions; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between undersigned counsel 

that, subject to the approval of this Court: 

The deadline for serving and filing ADR certifications and filing either a joint ADR 

certification with stipulation to an ADR process or a notice of need for an ADR telephone 

conference shall be extended to November 7, 2005. 

Dated: October 28, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ David A. McCarthy 

David A. McCarthy 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 

Dated: October 28, 2005 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 

By: /s/ Jack DiCanio 

Jack DiCanio 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Gregory L. Reyes 

Dated: October 28, 2005 FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 

By: /s/ William B. Federman 

William B. Federman 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 3:05-cv-02233-CRB Document 55 Filed 10/31/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C05-02233 CRB

-2- 2754361_1.DOC 

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 

I, David A. McCarthy, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of 

the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 28 day of 

October 2005 at Palo Alto, California. 

 /s/ David A. McCarthy 

 David A. McCarthy 

Case 3:05-cv-02233-CRB Document 55 Filed 10/31/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C05-02233 CRB

-3- 2754361_1.DOC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

This _____ day of October, 2005. 

THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

31st

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-02233-CRB Document 55 Filed 10/31/05 Page 4 of 4