Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826/USCOURTS-cand-3_13-cv-03826-43/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE 

RESPONSES ADDRESSING ARGUMENTS RAISED IN SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099

tboutrous@gibsondunn.com

THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570

tevangelis@gibsondunn.com

DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,

SBN 254433

dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com

333 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197

Telephone: 213.229.7000

Facsimile: 213.229.7520

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557

jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289

kringdowell@gibsondunn.com

555 Mission Street, Suite 3000

San Francisco, CA 94105-0921

Telephone: 415.393.8200

Facsimile: 415.393.8306

Attorneys for Defendant 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS 

COLOPY, MATTHEW MANAHAN, and 

ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant

CASE NO. 3: 13-03826-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR

PARTIES TO FILE RESPONSES 

ADDRESSING ARGUMENTS RAISED IN 

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

Date: November 24, 2015

Time: 1:30 pm

Place: Courtroom 5

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Douglas 

O’Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Uber 

Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree as follows: 

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice

ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000

Boston, MA 02116

Telephone: (617) 994-5800

Facsimile: (617) 994-5801

sliss@llrlaw.com

apagano@llr law.com

MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242

CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES

100 Pine Street, Suite 1250

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 817-1470

mcarlson@carlsonlegalservices.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, 

MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE 

GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 385 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE RESPONSES 

ADDRESSING ARGUMENTS RAISED IN SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

WHEREAS, on November 13, 2015, the Court issued a Supplemental Briefing Order (Dkt. 

No. 383) stating that by the end of the business day on Monday, November 16, 2015, “[t]he parties 

may file a response addressing the arguments raised in the supplemental briefs” filed on November 

10, 2015 (Dkt. Nos. 380, 381);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs request an extension of the Court-ordered deadline from the end of the 

business day on November 16, 2015, to 12:00 p.m. Pacific time on November 18, 2015, because 

Attorney Adelaide Pagano, who is the primary associate working with Attorney Shannon LissRiordan in representing the plaintiffs in this matter, had a death in the family and had to travel to 

Michigan over the weekend for the funeral, and is expected to return to Boston on the afternoon of 

November 17, 2015;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs state that Attorney Liss-Riordan is scheduled to participate in a longscheduled full-day mediation in another matter on November 17, 2015; 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs state that this extra time will permit Plaintiffs opportunity to prepare 

and finalize their reply brief just requested by the Court this past Friday afternoon; 

WHEREAS, Defendant is prepared to file its response by the Court-ordered deadline of 

November 16, 2015, but does not object to Plaintiffs’ request for an extension in light of the 

circumstances;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that:

The deadline for the parties’ responses addressing the arguments raised in the supplemental briefs

shall be moved to November 18, 2015, at 12:00 p.m. Pacific time. 

Dated: November 16, 2015 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN

ADELAIDE PAGANO

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 385 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE RESPONSES 

ADDRESSING ARGUMENTS RAISED IN SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

By: /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, 

MATTHEW MANAHAN, and ELIE GURFINKEL, 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

Dated: November 16, 2015 THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR.

THEANE D. EVANGELIS

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ

DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA

KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By: /s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada

Attorneys for Defendant

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: ____________________

Hon. Edward M. Chen

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

November 16, 2015

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 385 Filed 11/16/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 385 Filed 11/16/15 Page 4 of 4