Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00328/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-00328-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:185 Employee Pension Plan

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Jose Moreno and Larry Totten as

Trustees of the Laborers Health and

Welfare Trust Fund for Northern

California, et al,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

Crutchfield Construction Co., Inc., a

California corporation, and Harold

D. Crutchfield, an individual, 

 Defendants.

_____________________________/

No. C-06-0328 WDB

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL

SUBMISSIONS RE MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

On September 7, 2006, the Court conducted a hearing in connection with

plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment, filed July 18, 2006. For the reasons

stated on the record, the Court ORDERS as follows.

By Monday, October 16, 2006, plaintiffs must file with the Court and

serve on defendants their supplemental submissions, if any, with respect to the

following:

1. Bases for finding that the members of EUCA acknowledged and

adopted the same terms presented in the agreements between AGC

and the union and/or other evidence that supports a finding that the

terms of the AGC agreements are the same terms applicable to

signatories who are members of EUCA,

Case 3:06-cv-00328-JSW Document 28 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Bases for finding that it is appropriate to charge defendants liquidated

damages at the rate of $150.00 flat fee per month for each separate

account maintained by plaintiffs, resulting in liquidated damages in

the amounts $300.00 or $450.00 for some months,

3. Evidence identifying each of the attorneys who performed the work

for which plaintiffs’ seek attorneys’ fees and setting forth the

experience and qualifications of each of those attorneys, and 

4. Brief description of the reason counsel used a messenger for each

instance for which plaintiffs seek reimbursement of messenger costs.

By Monday, October 30, 2006, at 4:00 p.m., defendants must file with the

Court and serve on plaintiffs their response, if any, to plaintiffs’ October 16th

submission.

On Monday, October 30, 2006, at 4:00 p.m., plaintiffs’ Motion for

Default Judgment will be DEEMED SUBMITTED.

The Court ORDERS plaintiffs to serve a copy of this Order on

defendants immediately.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 8, 2006

/s/ Wayne D. Brazil 

WAYNE D. BRAZIL

United States Magistrate Judge

Copies to: 

Plaintiffs with direction to serve defendants,

wdb, stats

Case 3:06-cv-00328-JSW Document 28 Filed 09/08/06 Page 2 of 2