Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00069/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00069-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC AND ADR PHONE CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC 

Harrison J. Frahn IV (Bar No. 206822) 

hfrahn@stblaw.com 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 251-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 

Attorney for Defendant Light In The Box Limited 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

E & E CO., LTD., a California corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

LIGHT IN THE BOX LIMITED, a Hong 

Kong corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC 

Judge Edward M. Chen 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 

ASSOCIATED DATES, AND ADR PHONE 

CONFERENCE 

Third Amended Complaint Filed: 

February 4, 2016 

Current CMC Date: March 17, 2016 

Plaintiff E & E Co., Ltd., (“Plaintiff” or “E & E”) and Defendant Light In The Box 

Limited (“Defendant” or “LITB”) (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate to a fourteen (14) 

day continuance of the initial Case Management Conference (“CMC”), currently set for March 17, 

2016, and all dates associated therewith, including the time to file the Case Management 

Statement and for the exchange of Initial Disclosures. The Parties further stipulate to a fourteen 

(14) day continuance of the ADR Phone Conference currently set for March 14, 2016. The 

Parties’ stipulation is based on the following facts: 

1. Following the filing of LITB’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint on 

September 14, 2015 (Dkt. No. 44), the Court reset the CMC from November 9, 2015, to December 

10, 2015 (Dkt. No. 46); 

Case 3:15-cv-00069-EMC Document 87 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC AND ADR PHONE CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC

2. Plaintiff E & E filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) in the above 

captioned case against Defendant LITB on October 14, 2015 (Dkt. No. 60); 

3. After ongoing settlement discussions, the Parties entered into a joint stipulation and 

proposed order to continue the CMC (Dkt. No. 66), which order was entered by the Court on 

November 16, 2015, resetting the CMC for January 21, 2016 (Dkt. No. 67); 

4. Following the filing of LITB’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint 

on December 28, 2015 (Dkt. No. 72), the Court reset the CMC from January 21, 2016, to March 3, 

2016, and set the date for the submission of the Case Management Statement to February 25, 2016 

(Dkt. No. 73). 

5. Plaintiff E & E filed a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) in the above captioned 

case against Defendant LITB on February 4, 2016 (Dkt. No. 79), and Defendant LITB filed an 

Answer to the TAC on February 11, 2016 (Dkt. No. 80). 

6. At the request of the Parties, an ADR Phone Conference was scheduled for 

February 22, 2016 (Dkt. No. 83). 

7. The Parties reengaged in settlement discussions and made significant strides 

towards resolution of this matter, resulting in a request to continue the CMC, its associated dates, 

and the ADR Phone Conference on February 18, 2016 (Dkt. No. 84). Such request was granted on 

February 19, 2016 (Dkt. No. 85) causing the CMC to be rescheduled for March 17, 2016, along 

with its associated dates, and the ADR Phone Conference to be rescheduled for March 14, 2016, 

by the ADR Unit. 

8. The Parties remain in close and diligent settlement negotiations and would like 

time to continue their settlement talks before taking the time and expense of filing a Joint CMC 

statement, preparing and exchanging Initial Disclosures, preparing for and participating in the 

ADR Phone Conference, and preparing for and attending the CMC. 

9. The Parties submit that this agreement was made in the spirit of conserving judicial 

resources and is in the best interests of the Parties. 

10. The Parties, therefore, respectfully request that the CMC scheduled for March 17, 

2016, be continued for fourteen (14) days until March 31, 2016, or a date convenient to the Court, 

Case 3:15-cv-00069-EMC Document 87 Filed 03/07/16 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 3 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC AND ADR PHONE CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC

along with all dates associated therewith, including continuing the date for filing the Joint CMC 

Statement and exchanging Initial Disclosure to one week before the new CMC date. The Parties 

further request that the ADR Phone Conference currently set for March 14, 2016, be continued for 

fourteen (14) days until March 28, 2016, or a date convenient to the Court and ADR Unit. 

Dated: March 3, 2016 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV 

Harrison J. Frahn IV 

 hfrahn@stblaw.com 

 Attorney for Defendant, Light In The Box Limited

 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 

By: /s/ John Shaeffer 

John Shaeffer 

jshaeffer@foxrothschild.com 

Ashe Puri 

apuri@foxrothschild.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, E & E CO., LTD. 

Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing 

of this document has been obtained from the signatories to this document. 

Case 3:15-cv-00069-EMC Document 87 Filed 03/07/16 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC AND ADR PHONE CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00069-EMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that: 

1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued from March 17, 2016, until 

_____________, 2016; 

2. All other deadlines associated with the Case Management Conference shall be 

continued, accordingly, including the filing of a Joint Case Management Conference statement and 

exchange of Initial Disclosures, which shall be continued until one week before the new CMC 

date. The Parties shall comply with this Court’s Standing Order re: Initial Case Management and 

the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California re: Contents of Case 

Management Statements. 

3. The ADR Phone Conference shall be continued from March 14, 2016, until 

_____________, 2016; 

Dated: ____________, 2016 _________________________________ 

 Hon. Edward M. Chen, 

 United States District Judge 

April 7

March 28 (or to another date to be set by ADR Unit) March 7

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00069-EMC Document 87 Filed 03/07/16 Page 4 of 4