Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-02024/USCOURTS-cand-5_13-cv-02024-32/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RADWARE, LTD., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

F5 NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:13-cv-02024-RMW 

ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL

Before the court are administrative motions to seal a number of documents related to the 

parties’ summary judgment briefing. “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to 

inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’”

Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) 

(quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n. 7 (1978)). Accordingly, when 

considering a sealing request, “a ‘strong presumption in favor of access’ is the starting point.” Id.

(quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). Parties 

seeking to seal judicial records relating to dispositive motions bear the burden of overcoming the 

presumption with “compelling reasons” that outweigh the general history of access and the public 

policies favoring disclosure. Id. at 1178-79.

A protective order sealing the documents during discovery may reflect the court’s previous 

determination that good cause exists to keep the documents sealed, see Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 12
2

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

1179-80, but a blanket protective order that allows the parties to designate confidential documents 

does not provide sufficient judicial scrutiny to determine whether each particular document should 

remain sealed. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(A) (“Reference to a stipulation or protective order that 

allows a party to designate certain documents as confidential is not sufficient to establish that a 

document, or portions thereof, are sealable.”).

In addition to making particularized showings of good cause, parties moving to seal 

documents must comply with the procedures established by Civ. L.R. 79-5. Pursuant to 

Civ. L.R. 79-5(b), a sealing order is appropriate only upon a request that establishes the document 

is “sealable,” or “privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection 

under the law.” “The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material, 

and must conform with Civil L.R. 79-5(d).” Civ. L.R. 79-5(b) (requiring the submitting party to 

attach a “proposed order that is narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material” which “lists in 

table format each document or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed,” and an “unreadacted 

version of the document” that indicates “by highlighting or other clear method, the portions of the 

document that have been omitted from the redacted version.”). “Within 4 days of the filing of the 

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a declaration as 

required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material is sealable.” 

Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

With these standards in mind, the courts rules on the instant motions as follows.

Preliminarily, the court grants F5’s motion to remove incorrectly filed documents, Dkt. 

No. 220. 

Motion 

to Seal

Document to be Sealed Ruling Reason/Explanation

179 Radware MSJ 

Infringement (179-4)

GRANTED-IN-PART and 

DENIED-IN-PART.

Not narrowly tailored. 

See rulings on cited 

documents below.

179 Exhibit 4: Stamm 

Deposition (179-6)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 2 of 12
3

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

179 Exhibit 7: F5 email (179-7) DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

179 Exhibit 8: Needham 

deposition (179-8)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

179 Exhibit 9: F5 document

(179-9)

GRANTED in its entirety. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

179 Exhibit 11: F5 email

(179-10)

GRANTED in its entirety. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

179 Exhibit 12: F5 document

(179-11)

GRANTED in its entirety. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

179 Exhibit 13: F5 document

(179-12)

GRANTED in its entirety. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

179 Exhibit 14: F5 email

(179-13)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

179 Exhibit 15: Needham email

(179-14)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

179 Exhibit 16: Needham email

(179-15)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

179 Exhibit 17: F5 email

(179-16)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

179 Exhibit 18: Radware Test

(179-17)

GRANTED in its entirety. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

179 Exhibit 19: Thornewell 

deposition (179-18)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

179 Exhibit 24: Alexander 

deposition (179-19)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

179 Exhibit 25: Masters 

deposition (179-20)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

179 Exhibit 26: Brewer 

deposition (179-21)

GRANTED in its entirety. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 3 of 12
4

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

179 Exhibit 27: Skene 

deposition (179-22)

GRANTED in its entirety. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

179 Exhibit 28: F5 

interrogatory response

(179-23)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

179 Exhibit 31: Melton 

deposition (179-24)

GRANTED in its entirety. Narrowly tailored to

confidential business 

information.

179 Rubin Infringement 

Declaration Ex. 1 and C1 –

C-3 (179-26 – 179-29)

GRANTED as to charts C-1 –

C-3. DENIED as to main expert 

report (179-26).

Radware failed to 

propose narrowly 

tailored redactions to 

report, much of which 

is unrelated to 

confidential business 

information. Charts cite 

many confidential 

documents. 

181 F5 MSJ on Invalidity GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting) 

at pages 12:8–17, 21:24–22:1, 

22:25–26, and 24:1–3, otherwise 

DENIED.

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

181 Exhibit 1: Peles Deposition 

(181-6)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

181 Exhibit 2: Rubin 

Deposition (181-8)

DENIED. Not narrowly tailored; 

filed excerpts relate 

largely to prior art.

181 Exhibit 18: Internal F5 

Document (181-10)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

184 Brewer Decl. (184-4) GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

184 F5 MSJ on Damages

(184-6)

DENIED as to redactions 

(yellow highlighting) at 2:21-

3:2; 17:10-15; otherwise 

GRANTED. 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

184 Exhibit 1: Trachtman Depo

(184-8)

DENIED. No confidential 

information. 

184 Exhibit 2: Peles Depo

(185-2)

DENIED. No confidential 

information. 

184 Exhibit 3: Brewer Depo

(184-10)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 4 of 12
5

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

184 Exhibit 4: Darwin Depo

(184-12)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

184 Exhibit 6: Stamm Report 

Excerpts (184-14)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

184 Exhibit 8: Radware Sales 

(185-2)

GRANTED in its entirety. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

184 Exhibit 9: Brain Depo

(184-16)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

184 Exhibit 10: Malackowski 

Rep. Excerpts (185-3)

DENIED. Not narrowly tailored. 

Radware revealed some 

of the information from 

the report in Dkt. No. 

205 at 23-24.

186 Radware MSJ on Invalidity 

(186-4)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Exhibit 1: Stamm Depo 

(186-6)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored.

186 Exhibit 2: Zisapel Depo 

(186-7)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Exhibit 3: Zisapel email 

(186-8)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Exhibit 4: Peles Depo 

(186-9)

GRANTED Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Exhibit 7: Alexander Depo 

(186-10)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored.

186 Exhibit 12: Masters Depo 

(186-11)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored.

186 Exhibit 13: Thornewell 

Depo (186-12)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; 

contains no 

confidential 

information.

186 Exhibit 15: Cisco White 

Paper (186-13)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 5 of 12
6

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

186 Exhibit 19: Internal 

Radware Document 

(186-14)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Exhibit 20: Internal 

Radware Document 

(186-15)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Exhibit 21: Internal 

Radware Document 

(186-16)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Exhibit 22: Internal 

Radware Document 

(186-17)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Exhibit 23: Internal 

Radware Document 

(186-18)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Exhibit 24: Internal 

Radware Document 

(186-19)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Exhibit 25: Internal 

Radware Document 

(186-20)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Exhibit 26: Internal 

Radware email (186-21)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Rubin Declaration (186-23) GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

186 Rubin Declaration Exhibit 

1: Rubin Rebuttal Report 

(186-24)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions at ¶ 39, l.4; ¶ 40, l.3; 

¶¶ 68–71; ¶¶173–176.

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

188 F5 MSJ Noninfringement 

(188-4)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (blue highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

188 Thornewell Decl. (188-6) GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

188 Exhibit 1: Rubin Depo 

(188-8)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

188 Exhibit 3: Rubin 

Infringement Chart 

(188-10)

GRANTED in its entirety. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

188 Exhibit 4: Alexander 

Report (188-12)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 6 of 12
7

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

196 F5 Opp. to Radware MSJ 

on Invalidity (196-4)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

198 Exhibit 1: Masters Depo

(198-4)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

198 Exhibit 2: Thornewell 

Depo (198-6)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

198 Exhibit 3: Stamm Report

(198-8)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

198 Exhibit 4: Brewer Depo. 

(198-10)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

198 Exhibit 9: Alexander 

Report (198-12)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business

information.

198 F5 Opp. to Radware MSJ 

Infringement (198-14)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (blue highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

200 Radware Opp. to F5 MSJ 

Non-Infringement (200-4)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

200 Exhibit A: Alexander 

Deposition (200-6)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

200 Exhibit B: Thornewell 

Deposition (200-7)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

202 Radware Opp. to F5 MSJ 

on Invalidity (202-4)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (highlights) at 4:10-

28; 5:1-8; 6:2, 10; 9:22-28; 10:1-

5; 22:15-17; and 24:7-8

DENIED as to proposed 

redactions (highlights) at 9:20-

and 22; 22:11-12, 18-22.

See ruling on Dkt. No. 

202-6. Remaining 

proposals are narrowly 

tailored to confidential 

business information.

202 Exhibit B: F5 White Paper 

(202-6)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Radware’s Opposition to 

F5’s MSJ on Damages

(204-4)

GRANTED as to redactions 

(yellow highlighting) at 2:4-15; 

14:24-25; 15:4-12; 16:9-18; 

otherwise DENIED. 

No supporting 

declaration filed 

re:F5’s information; 

not narrowly tailored.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 7 of 12
8

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

204 Exhibit 1: Schaller Depo

(204-6)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 2: Zisapel Depo

(204-7 – 204-8)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

204 Exhibit 3: Trachtman 

Depo. (204-9)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

204 Exhibit 9: Skene email

(204-10)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 10: Campa Depo.

(204-11)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 11: Campa email

(204-12 – 204-15)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 12: Campa email

(204-16)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 13: Campa email

(204-17)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 14: Notice of 

Allowance (204-18)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 15: F5 

Interrogatory responses

(204-19)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 16: Campa letter

(204-20)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 18: Campa email

(204-21)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 19: Campa email

(204-22)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 20: Campa email

(204-23)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 23: F5 CAT email

(204-24)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 8 of 12
9

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

204 Exhibit 24: Stamm Depo. 

(204-25)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 25: Melton Depo. 

(204-26)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 26: Stamm Rep. 

(204-27)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 27: Darwin Depo. 

(204-28)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 28: Brewer Depo. 

(204-29)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 29: Cherkassky 

Depo. (204-30)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

204 Exhibit 30: Malackowski 

Depo. (204-31)

DENIED. Not narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 31: Brewer email 

(204-32)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 32: Peles depo. 

(204-33)

DENIED. Contains no 

confidential 

information.

204 Exhibit 33: Brewer email 

(204-34)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 34: Brewer email 

(204-35)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 35: Brewer email 

(204-36)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 36: Rubin depo. 

(204-37)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 38: Banks depo. 

(204-38)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

204 Exhibit 40: Brain depo. 

(204-39)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

206 Exhibit A: 30(b)(6) letter

(206-4)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 9 of 12
10

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

206 Exhibit B: Radware: 

Discovery Responses

(206-5)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

206 Exhibit D: Brewer Depo.

(206-6)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

206 Exhibit E: Alexander 

Depo. (206-7)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

206 Exhibit G: Brain Depo.

(206-8)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

206 Exhibit H: Malackowski 

Report (206-9)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

206 Exhibit I: F5 Responses to 

Interrogatories (206-10)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

206 Exhibit K: Radware RFP

(206-11)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

209 Radware Reply in Support 

of MSJ on Invalidity 

(209-4)

GRANTED as to redactions 

(highlighting).

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

209 Exhibit A: Alexander 

Report (209-6)

DENIED No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

209 Exhibit B: Zisapel Depo 

(209-8)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

209 Exhibit C: Alexander Depo 

(209-10)

DENIED No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

209 Exhibit D: Cherkassky 

Depo (209-12)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

209 Exhibit E: Zisapel Depo, 

Email (209-14)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

210 Radware Reply re: 

Infringement (210-3)

DENIED as to redactions at page 

9 (yellow highlighting); 

otherwise GRANTED

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

210 Rubin Supp. Decl.

(210-11)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 10 of 12
11

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

210 Exhibit 33: Alexander Dep.

(210-7)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration from F5 

filed; not narrowly 

tailored. 

210 Exhibit 34: Brewer Dep. 

(210-9)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

214 Exhibit 1: Rubin Depo 

Excerpts (214-6)

DENIED. Declaration does not 

specify what 

information is 

confidential.

215 F5 Reply In Support of 

Motion For Summary 

Judgement on Damages 

Issues (215-3)

GRANTED as to redactions 

(blue highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information. 

215 Declaration of Ramsey AlSalam (215-5)GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (blue highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

215 Exhibit 1: Radware sales 

reports (215-7)

GRANTED (sealed in its 

entirety)

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

215 Exhibit 2: Radware sales 

reports (215-8)

GRANTED (sealed in its 

entirety)

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

215 Exhibit 3: Schaller Depo. 

(215-9)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions.

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information. 

215 Exhibit 4: Brewer Depo. 

(215-11) 

DENIED. No motion or 

supporting declaration 

filed. 

217 Motion for Summary 

Judgment of 

Noninfringement (217-3)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (blue highlighting). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

217 Exhibit 1: Malackowski 

Depo. (217-6)

DENIED. No motion or 

supporting declaration 

filed. 

217 Exhibit 2: Alexander NonInfringement Report

(217-7)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting).

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

217 Exhibit 3: Rubin Depo.

(217-9)

GRANTED. Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 11 of 12
12

5:13-cv-02024-RMW

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO SEAL

RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

217 Exhibit 4: Brewer Depo.

(217-10)

GRANTED as to redactions at 

45:3-25 (yellow highlighting); 

otherwise DENIED.

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information. The 

parties cannot redact 

the title page of the 

deposition.

217 Exhibit 5: Alexander Depo.

(217-12)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (yellow highlighting).

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

218 Exhibit 3: Brewer Depo. 

Excerpts (218-7)

DENIED. No motion or 

supporting declaration 

filed. 

218 Exhibit 4: Alexander 

Rebuttal Report (221-1)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (red boxes). 

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information. 

218 Exhibit 5: Rubin Initial 

Report (221-3)

GRANTED as to proposed 

redactions (red boxes).

Narrowly tailored to 

confidential business 

information.

225 Exhibit P: Thornewell 

Depo. Excerpts (225-10)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; not 

narrowly tailored. 

225 Radware’s Reply in 

support of Motion for 

Sanctions (225-3)

DENIED. No supporting 

declaration filed; 

redactions do not refer 

to any specific source 

code. 

All denials are without prejudice. The parties shall file, within 14 days, (1) versions of 

documents with only the redactions approved by this order or (2) revised sealing motions for the 

court’s consideration addressing the court’s reasons for denial discussed above. Failure to comply 

with this order will result in the clerk unsealing the documents listed above for which a motion to 

seal has been denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 4, 2015

______________________________________

Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Judge

Case 5:13-cv-02024-RMW Document 292 Filed 12/04/15 Page 12 of 12