Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02931/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02931-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C 03-02931 MJJ

MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 064307 

JAMES C. YOON, State Bar No. 177155 

MICHAEL A. BERTA, State Bar No. 194650 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANDISK CORPORATION 

MARK E. FERGUSON (pro hac vice)

TAREK ISMAIL (pro hac vice)

KASPAR J. STOFFELMAYR (pro hac vice)

BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 

Courthouse Place 

54 West Hubbard Street, Suite 300 

Chicago, IL 60610 

Telephone: (312) 494-4400 

Facsimile: (312) 494-4440 

D. PETER HARVEY, State Bar No. 55712 

RANJITSINH MAHIDA, State Bar No. 206741 

HARVEY SISKIND JACOBS LLP 

Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 354-0100 

Facsimile: (415) 391-7124 

Attorneys for Defendant

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SANDISK CORPORATION, a Delaware 

corporation,

 Plaintiff, 

v.

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, a German 

corporation, and DOES I to X; 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C 03-02931 MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE CLAIM

CONSTRUCTION HEARING

Judge: Hon. Martin J. Jenkins 

L.R. 7-11 

Case 3:03-cv-02931 Document 113 Filed 06/29/2005 Page 1 of 3 Case 3:03-cv-02931-MJJ Document 114 Filed 07/08/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C 03-02931 MJJ

-2- 2681939_1.DOC 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, plaintiff SanDisk Corporation (“SanDisk”) and defendant 

Infineon Technologies AG (“Infineon”) jointly submit this stipulated motion to respectfully 

request the Court to reschedule the upcoming Claim Construction Hearing from its current 

setting, July 8, 2005, to September 16, 2005, or a date thereafter that is convenient for the Court. 

As shown below, good cause exists for this requested continuance:

• The Claim Construction Hearing in this case was originally set for Friday, June 

24, 2005. The Court, by order dated June 20, 2005, continued the hearing to July 

8, 2005. 

• Both parties have preexisting obligations that conflict with the current scheduled 

hearing date of July 8, 2005. 

• In the process of conferring regarding potential alternate dates, the parties have 

certain other non-resolvable conflicts including: certain personal medical issues 

for counsel for Infineon in mid-to-late July 2005, a trial in Washington D.C. for 

counsel for SanDisk in late July through mid-August 2005, and personal medical 

leave for counsel for SanDisk in late August 2005. 

• The first Friday for which counsel for Infineon and counsel for SanDisk can 

confirm availability is September 16, 2005. 

• In addition, the parties have tentatively agreed to schedule a settlement conference 

between business persons this summer.

In light of the foregoing, SanDisk and Infineon respectfully request that the Court 

reschedule the Claim Construction Hearing for September 16, 2005, or a date thereafter at the 

Court’s convenience, and vacate the Court’s Case Management Conference scheduled for July 

12, 2005 until after the Claim Construction Hearing. 

Dated: June 29, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Michael A. Berta 

Michael A. Berta 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-defendant

SANDISK CORPORATION 

Case 3:03-cv-02931 Document 113 Filed 06/29/2005 Page 2 of 3 Case 3:03-cv-02931-MJJ Document 114 Filed 07/08/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C 03-02931 MJJ

-3- 2681939_1.DOC 

Dated: June 29, 2005 BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR

& SCOTT LLP 

By: /s/ Kaspar J. Stoffelmayr 

Kaspar J. Stoffelmayr 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff 

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 

ECF CERTIFICATION

I, Michael A. Berta, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 

to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CLAIM 

CONSTRUCTION HEARING. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that 

Kaspar Stoffelmayr has concurred in this filing. 

Dated: June 29, 2005 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Michael A. Berta 

Michael A. Berta 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SANDISK CORPORATION 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-02931 Document 113 Filed 06/29/2005 Page 3 of 3

7/8/2005 /S/

Case 3:03-cv-02931-MJJ Document 114 Filed 07/08/05 Page 3 of 3