Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_09-cv-00682/USCOURTS-azd-4_09-cv-00682-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

WAYNE E. COATES and PATRICIA

WIERCINSKI,

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

SUSAN MINNICK, ERIC MATHERS,

KATHLEEN ROWLEY and JAMES

ROWLEY, JOSEPH ROWLEY and

KRISTA ROWLEY, MANUEL

NORIEGA and MAGDALENA

NORIEGA, GREGORY H. SCHEID

and BETH ANN SCHEID,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 No. CIV 09-682-TUC-CKJ(CRP)

ORDER

On September 17, 2010, Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle issued a Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 73) in which he recommended that the Motion for Summary Judgment

(Doc. 38) filed by Defendants Susan Minnick and Eric Mathers be granted. The magistrate

judge advised the parties that any objections had to be served and filed within 14 days of being

served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation and that, if objections were not timely

filed, they may be deemed waived. No objections have been filed within the time provided by

28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 

Accordingly, after an independent review, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 73) is ADOPTED;

2. Susan Minnick and Eric Mathers’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) is

GRANTED, and;

Case 4:09-cv-00682-CKJ-CRP Document 84 Filed 10/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

3. Judgment is awarded in favor of Defendants Susan Minnick and Eric Mathers

and against Plaintiffs as to all claims. 

DATED this 25th day of October, 2010.

Case 4:09-cv-00682-CKJ-CRP Document 84 Filed 10/26/10 Page 2 of 2