Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02177/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02177-18/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

STIPULATION EXTENDING DATE FOR REALTEK TO FILE 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE ’625 PATENT Case No. CV-03-2177 VRW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD, LLP 

YITAI HU (SBN 248085) (yhu@akingump.com) 

ELIZABETH H. RADER (SBN 184963) (erader@akingump.com) 

MING-TAO YANG (SBN 221295) (myang@akingump.com) 

580 California Street, Suite 1500 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1036 

Telephone: (415) 765-9500 

Facsimile: (415) 765-9501 

Email: erader@akingump.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 

Jeffrey E. Ostrow (CSB No. 213118) 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

2550 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 251-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 

Henry B. Gutman (pro hac vice) 

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

425 Lexington Avenue 

New York, New York 10017 

Telephone: (212) 455-2000 

Facsimile: (212) 455-2502 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

3COM CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

3COM CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR 

CORPORATION 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. Cv-03-2177-VRW 

STIPULATION EXTENDING DATE FOR 

REALTEK TO FILE MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE ’625 PATENT

Date: April 5, 2007 

Time: 2:00 pm 

Judge: Vaughn R. Walker 

Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor 

 

Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 385 Filed 03/05/07 Page 1 of 3
 2 

STIPULATION EXTENDING DATE FOR REALTEK TO FILE 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE ’625 PATENT Case No. CV-03-2177 VRW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WHEREAS, 

1. Realtek’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of 3Com’s U.S. 

Patent No. 6,327,625 (“’625 patent”) is due to be filed on March 1, 2007, pursuant to the 

agreement reached during the February 6, 2007 Case Management Conference; and 

2. The parties are discussing a potential resolution of the issue to be presented in the 

motion, on grounds that 3Com believes are substantively unrelated to those at issue in 3Com’s 

Motion for Reconsideration due to be filed on March 1, 2007, in Case No. Cv-5-00098-VRW; and 

3. If the parties are able to reach a successful resolution of the issue to be presented in 

Realtek’s Motion for Summary Judgment, that motion will be unnecessary and moot, 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE and respectfully request 

the Court to order as FOLLOWS: 

1. Realtek shall file its motion for summary judgment of noninfringement relating to 

3Com’s ’625 patent no later than March 15, 2007, all other briefing to follow the schedule set out 

for motions in this Court’s local rules. 

Dated: February 28, 2007 

 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 

By: /s 

 Kerry L. Konrad 

(pro hac vice) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 

3COM CORPORATION 

 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

By: /s 

 Elizabeth H. Rader, Esq. 

(State Bar No. 184963) 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff 

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. 

Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 385 Filed 03/05/07 Page 2 of 3
 3 

STIPULATION EXTENDING DATE FOR REALTEK TO FILE 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE ’625 PATENT Case No. CV-03-2177 VRW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under 

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Kerry L. 

Konrad. 

Dated: February 28, 2007 

 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

By: /s 

 Elizabeth H. Rader, Esq. 

(State Bar No. 184963) 

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterplaintiff 

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________, 2007 _________________________ 

 Honorable Vaughn R. Walker 

 United States District Judge 

March 5

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANTED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:03-cv-02177-VRW Document 385 Filed 03/05/07 Page 3 of 3