Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04058/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-04058-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 460
Nature of Suit: Deportation
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAIRO ADALID MARTINEZ VILLAFRANCA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY, et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-05-4058 MMC

ORDER GRANTING JUDGMENT FOR

DEFENDANTS ON PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY

RELIEF AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Before the Court is plaintiff’s Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Injunctive Relief. 

The matter came on regularly for hearing October 24, 2005. Rebecca M. Biernat of

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP appeared on behalf of plaintiff. Ila C. Deiss,

Assistant United States Attorney, appeared on behalf of defendants. Having considered

the papers submitted and the arguments of counsel, the Court, for the reasons stated on

the record at the hearing, finds that defendants’ October 18, 2005 decision, denying

plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of defendants’ May 16, 2005 denial of plaintiff’s

request that the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security relinquish federal

custody jurisdiction over him and consent to the state juvenile court’s exercise of custody

jurisdiction, is not “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in

accordance with law.” See 5 U.S.C. § 706.

Accordingly, the Court hereby grants judgment in favor of defendants and 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

against plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2005 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge