Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04030/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-04030-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Matthew Mellen (Bar No. 233350)

Jessica Galletta (Bar No. 281179)

MELLEN LAW FIRM

411 Borel Avenue, Suite 230

San Mateo, CA 94402

Telephone: (650) 638-0120

Facsimile: (650) 638-01251

Attorney for Plaintiffs,

EVELYN NAND

SYKHANDRA NAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EVELYN NAND, an individual; SUKHANDRA 

NAND, an individual; 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

SPECIALIZED PORTFOLIO SERVICING, 

INC., a business entity; NATIONAL DEFAULT 

SERVICING CORPORATION, a business

entity; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX

PARTE APPLICATION AND TO 

SHOW CAUSE FOR PRELIMINARY 

INJUNCTION

Based on the Application, Points and Authorities, and supporting Declarations in the 

moving papers, and for good cause shown, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have established good 

cause for issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order. 

IT ORDERED that, sufficient reason having been shown therefore, pending the hearing 

of plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Rule 65, Fed. R. Civ., P., that 

Defendant and its agents is temporarily restrained and enjoined from foreclosing upon the subject 

property located at 6910 Jarvis Avenue, Newark, CA 94560 until further ruling from this Court. 

The Temporary Restraining Order issued because Plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of prevailing 

on their claims for violations of California Civil Code § 2923.6, California Civil Code § 2923., 

and 12 C.F.R. 1024.41. Further, Plaintiffs have shown the likelihood of irreparable injury in the 

Case 3:16-cv-04030-EMC Document 12 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

absence of a Temporary Restraining Order, namely, the loss of their property through foreclosure. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above named Defendants show cause before a 

motion term of this Court, at Room _______, United States District Courthouse, on 

____________________ ______, 2016 at ________p.m, or as soon thereafter as counsel 

may be heard, why an order should not be issued pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure enjoining the Defendant and its agents during the pendency of this action from 

foreclosing upon the subject property located at 6910 Jarvis Avenue, Newark, CA 94560. 

With respect to the hearing regarding a preliminary injunction, the Court further 

ORDERS as follows:

The preliminary injunction hearing will be heard on: _________________________.

Moving papers shall be filed by: ________________________.

Responsive papers are due by: __________________________.

Reply papers are due by: _____________________.

IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED.

DATED: _________________________

United States District Court Judge 

August 4 1:30 August 4, 2016 at 1:30 pm n/a July 26, 2016 July 29, 2016 July 18, 2016

Case 3:16-cv-04030-EMC Document 12 Filed 07/18/16 Page 2 of 2