Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00060/USCOURTS-caed-1_14-cv-00060-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ARTHUR DUANE JACKSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 1:13-cv-01055-LJO-SAB

COREY LAMAR SMITH, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 1:14-cv-00060-LJO-SAB

FREDERICK BEAGLE, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 1:14-cv-00430- LJO-SAB

ORDER FOR COUNSEL TO MEET AND 

CONFER RE RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE 

 On May 28, 2014, the Court conducted an informal telephonic conference to address a 

Case 1:14-cv-00060-LJO-SAB Document 56 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

di

Be

1:

the

de

joi

by

20

to 

the

at 

to 

the

pa

the

di

su

IT

scovery disp

eagle v. Schw

13-cv-01055

e hearing, t

eveloping a p

int discovery

y July 8, 20

014 at 10:00

appear at th

e teleconfere

The pa

this time di

set specific 

ese actions w

arties, a redu

ese cases w

scovery will

ubsequently f

T IS SO ORD

Dated: 

pute between

warzenegger

50-LJO-SAB

he parties to

plan as to ho

y plan and, i

14. A telep

0 a.m. The p

he hearing. T

ence code fo

arties are adv

scovery is n

dates at this

will proceed

uction in the 

will be appro

l be approac

filed cases in

DERED. 

May 29, 2

n the parties

r, 1:14-cv-00

B also appea

o all three a

ow discovery

if necessary,

phonic heari

parties are to

The parties m

or the call if n

vised that th

not open in t

s time, but to

d in the futur

costs of liti

oached as c

ched when, a

nvolving the

2014 

2

in Smith v.

0430-SAB-L

ared telepho

actions shal

y will be con

, each side m

ing to addre

o call the tol

may contact 

needed. 

his order doe

hese actions

o develop a c

re. The plan

igation, and 

currently situ

and if, future

e core issues 

U

 Schwarzene

LJO. Couns

onically at th

ll confer by 

nducted in th

may file a thr

ss the disco

ll-free teleco

t Courtroom 

es not chang

s. The plan 

coordinated 

n should adeq

the most eff

uated. Furt

e parties are 

presented in

UNITED ST

egger, 1:14-

sel for Jackso

he conferenc

y June 23, 2

hese actions

ree page brie

overy plan sh

onference nu

Deputy Mam

e the curren

to be addres

approach as

quately reco

fficient mean

ther, the pla

added not o

n these cases

TATES MA

-cv-00060-SA

on v. State o

ce. As discu

2014 for the

s. The partie

ef on any dis

hall be held

umber of (87

mie Hernand

nt status of d

ssed by the p

s to how the 

ognize the in

ns by which 

an should c

only in these

s. 

GISTRATE

AB-LJO and

of California

ussed during

e purpose o

es shall file a

sputed issue

d on July 11

77) 336-1280

dez to obtain

discovery and

parties is no

discovery in

nterests of the

discovery in

consider how

e cases but in

E JUDGE 

d

a, 

g

f 

a

s 

1, 

0

n

d

ot 

n

e

n

w

n

Case 1:14-cv-00060-LJO-SAB Document 56 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 2