Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04448/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04448-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

---

Case 3:04-cv-04448-SC Document 39 Filed 01/13/06 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:04-cv-04448-SC Document 39 Filed 01/13/06 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:04-cv-04448-SC Document 39 Filed 01/13/06 Page 3 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Secretary Samuel W. Bodman, sworn into office February 1, 2005, is automatically substituted for

his predecessor, Spencer Abraham, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)(1). This Stipulation is

entered into on behalf of the DOE and the individually named defendants acting in their official

capacity.

Stipulation and [Proposed] Scheduling Order

NRDC et al. v. DOE et al. (N.D. Cal.)

Case No. 04-04448 SC (BZ) - 4

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, COMMITTEE

TO BRIDGE THE GAP, and CITY OF LOS ANGELES, and Defendants, U.S. DEPARTMENT

OF ENERGY (“DOE”), SAMUEL W. BODMAN,1

 Secretary of DOE, and CAMILLE YUANSOO HOO (collectively, the “Parties”), engaged in an alternative dispute resolution process

before Hon. Judge Bernard Zimmerman, which process is now concluded;

WHEREAS, the Court has contacted the Parties and requested that they file a stipulation

with respect to the schedule for motions that they anticipate in this matter, and the Parties,

through counsel, have conferred to this end;

WHEREAS, the Court has requested that Defendants lodge one copy of the

Administrative Record (“AR”) with the Court;

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND THE PARTIES STIPULATE, subject to the Court’s

approval, as follows:

January 20, 2006 DOE lodges one copy of the AR with the Court and provides plaintiffs

with one copy of any AR materials not previously provided

March 10, 2006 Plaintiffs file for Summary Judgment (45 page limit)

April 12, 2006 Defendants file a combined Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion and a Cross

Motion for Summary Judgment (60 page limit)

May 10, 2006 Plaintiffs file an Opposition to Defendants' Motion and Reply in Support

of their Motion (30 page limit)

June 7, 2006 Defendants file a Reply in Support of their Cross Motion. (15 page limit)

Case 3:04-cv-04448-SC Document 39 Filed 01/13/06 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:04-cv-04448-SC Document 39 Filed 01/13/06 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:04-cv-04448-SC Document 39 Filed 01/13/06 Page 6 of 7
1/13/06

Case 3:04-cv-04448-SC Document 39 Filed 01/13/06 Page 7 of 7