Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-02199/USCOURTS-casd-3_08-cv-02199-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

08cv2199

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT E. BECKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

SPACEDEV, INC. et al.,

Defendants. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 08cv2199-L(CAB)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART JOINT

MOTION

On October 14, 2009 the parties filed a Joint Motion Regarding Amended Complaint and

Related Response Dates (“Joint Motion”). The parties stipulated to Plaintiff’s filing of an

amended complaint and significantly extending the due date for Defendants’ response to the

amended complaint and briefing schedule on a motion to dismiss, if any. 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), the parties’ request to allow the

filing of an amended complaint is GRANTED. Their request to extend the date for filing a

response pursuant to Rule 15(a)(3) and the briefing schedule set forth by Civil Local Rule 7.1 is

DENIED. Rule 6(b) requires a showing of good cause for extension of due dates. The parties

did not attempt to show good cause or provide any explanation for their request in this regard.

/ / / / /

/ / / / /

/ / / / /

Case 3:08-cv-02199-L-CAB Document 22 Filed 10/15/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 08cv2199

For the foregoing reasons, the Joint Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN

PART.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 15, 2009

M. James Lorenz

United States District Court Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02199-L-CAB Document 22 Filed 10/15/09 Page 2 of 2