Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01163/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01163-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Petitioner has also failed to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or to pay the required 1

filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TEDDY S. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-1163 GGH P

vs.

EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, JR.,

Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has apparently attempted to file a petition pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §2254. In this document, petitioner sets forth a number of nonsensical comments,

including: “Madonna! Who me? Ok yes you” ; “Attention: Ladies on Jerry Talk Show”;

“Hillary !!! Hillary !!! Hillary !!!” Petition, p. 1. While unclear, petitioner also appears to 1

assert that he was convicted of cocaine possession, which he asserts actually may have been “trail

mix.” Petition, p. 2. In this garbled putative petition, the only discernible relief sought is that 

the court require prison officials “to immediately answer all pending 602's,” which appeals he in

no way coherently describes and which, in any event, is a wholly inappropriate request in the

context of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petition, p. 8.

Case 2:06-cv-01163-LKK -GGH Document 4 Filed 11/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District

Courts requires the court to dismiss a petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the petition and any

attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court....” This

application is one warranting such summary dismissal.

Accordingly IT IS RECOMMENDED that the petition be summarily dismissed,

pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District

Courts.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v.

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 11/7/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

will1163.fr

Case 2:06-cv-01163-LKK -GGH Document 4 Filed 11/07/06 Page 2 of 2