Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02591/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-02591-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

Order to Ex Parte Application to Extend Page Limit on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

Nancy J. Sheehan, SBN 109419 

George A. Acero, SBN 226709 

350 University Avenue, Suite 200 

Sacramento, California 95825 

(916) 929-1481 

(916) 927-3706 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Defendants: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LARRY 

VANDERHOEF (erroneously sued as LAWRENCE VANDERHOEF), GREG WARZECKA, 

PAM GILL-FISHER, ROBERT FRANKS and LAWRENCE SWANSON 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

AREZOU MANSOURIAN, LAUREN

MANCUSO, NANCY NIEN-LI CHIANG,

and CHRISTINE WING-SI NG; and all those

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:03-CV-02591-FCD-EFB 

 

ORDER TO EX PARTE APPLICATION TO 

EXTEND PAGE LIMIT ON DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Date: February 8, 2008 

Courtroom: 2 

“AS MODIFIED”

 The Court has reviewed the Ex Parte Application and found good cause to grant Defendant’s 

request for a page extension. However, the court shall modify the order as follows: 

Defendant REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA shall be permitted to 

file its Motion for Summary Judgment in excess of 20 pages, but not to exceed 40 pages. 

Plaintiffs AREZOU MANSOURIAN, LAUREN MANCUSO, NANCY NIEN-LI 

CHIANG, and CHRISTINE WING-SI NG shall be permitted to file its Opposition to the Motion for 

Summary Judgment in excess of 20 pages, but not to exceed 40 pages. 

///// 

Case 2:03-cv-02591-KJM-EFB Document 263 Filed 12/04/07 Page 1 of 2
2 

Order to Ex Parte Application to Extend Page Limit on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA shall be permitted to 

File its Reply to the Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment in excess of 10 pages, but not to 

exceed 20 pages. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: December 4, 2007 

Case 2:03-cv-02591-KJM-EFB Document 263 Filed 12/04/07 Page 2 of 2