Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03843/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-03843-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION REGARDING THE REBUTTAL REPORT OF DR. JOHN BRAVMAN 

CASE NO. CV-04-03843 RMW (HRL) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

1530 PAGE MILL ROAD

PALO ALTO, CA 94304-1125 

TELEPHONE: 650.856.3700 

FACSIMILE: 650.856.3710 

NANCY J. GEENEN, BAR NO. 135968 

DAVID B. MOYER, BAR NO. 197739 

AARON M. SCHWARZ, BAR NO. 209275 

KIMBERLY K. DODD, BAR NO. 235109 

ATTORNEYS FOR COUNTERDEFENANT, 

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

MEMRY CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

KENTUCKY OIL TECHNOLOGY, N.V., 

PETER BESSELINK, MEMORY METALS 

HOLLAND, B.V., 

 Defendants. 

 Case No. CV-04-03843 RMW (HRL) 

STIPULATION REGARDING THE 

REBUTTAL REPORT OF DR. JOHN 

BRAVMAN 

KENTUCKY OIL TECHNOLOGY, N.V., 

 Counterclaimant, 

 v. 

MEMRY CORPORATION and 

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY 

CORPORATION, 

 Counterdefendants. 

 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 

WHEREAS the parties have stipulated to the following schedule governing expert 

discovery (Dkt. No. 311): (1) initial reports due January 19, 2007; (2) rebuttal reports due 

February 9, 2007; and (3) expert discovery cut-off March 2, 2007; 

WHEREAS Schlumberger Technology Corporation (“STC”) planned to serve a rebuttal 

AND ORDER *E-FILED - 4/3/07*

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 581 Filed 04/03/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION REGARDING THE REBUTTAL REPORT OF DR. JOHN BRAVMAN 

CASE NO. CV-04-03843 RMW (HRL) 

2

report by Dr. John Bravman on February 9, 2007; 

WHEREAS Dr. Bravman fell ill on an airplane the week of January 29, causing the flight 

to be diverted to Denver where he remained hospitalized until February 4; 

WHEREAS Dr. Bravman needs additional time to recover during the week of 

February 5; 

WHEREAS Dr. Bravman cannot complete his rebuttal report by February 9 due to the 

above; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties that 

1. STC shall have up to and including February 23, 2007 to serve Dr. Bravman’s 

rebuttal report; 

2. KOT shall have up to and including February 23, 2007 to serve Dr. Kenneth E. 

Perry’s rebuttal report; and 

3. The parties may take the depositions of Dr. Bravman and Dr. Perry after the 

March 2 deadline to complete expert discovery. 

DATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2007 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

 

/S/ 

 KIMBERLY K. DODD

ATTORNEYS FOR COUNTERDEFENDANT

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION 

DATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2007 CANTOR COLBURN LLP /S/ 

 ANDREW C. RYAN

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF AND 

COUNTERDEFENDANT MEMRY

CORPORATION 

DATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2007 LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP

 

/S/ 

 JEFFREY D. WEXLER

ATTORNEYS FOR KENTUCKY OIL

TECHNOLOGY, N.V., PETER BESSELINK

AND MEMORY METAL HOLLAND B.V. 

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 581 Filed 04/03/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION REGARDING THE REBUTTAL REPORT OF DR. JOHN BRAVMAN 

CASE NO. CV-04-03843 RMW (HRL) 

3

Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Andrew C. Ryan and 

Jeffrey D. Wexler, the signatories listed above. 

DATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2007 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

 

/S/ 

 KIMBERLY K. DODD

ATTORNEYS FOR COUNTERDEFENDANT

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION 

ORDER

Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE: , 2007 

 RONALD M. WHYTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4/3/07

Case 5:04-cv-03843-RMW Document 581 Filed 04/03/07 Page 3 of 3