Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-02193/USCOURTS-azd-2_08-cv-02193-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kevin A. Osborn, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Ivan Bartos, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-02193-PHX-ROS (JRI)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin’s Report and

Recommendation, which was filed on April 28, 2010. (Doc. 143) Magistrate Judge Irwin

recommends Defendant Marten be dismissed for failure to effect service. 

A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 USC § 636(b). Where any party has

filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendations, the district

court’s review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.”) (internal

quotations and citations omitted).

No objections being made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in

full. 

Case 2:08-cv-02193-ROS Document 200 Filed 09/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation is (Doc. 143) IS ADOPTED

and Defendant Marten IS DISMISSED.

DATED this 8th day of September, 2010.

Case 2:08-cv-02193-ROS Document 200 Filed 09/09/10 Page 2 of 2