Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00932/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00932-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman,

803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALONZO REED, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-0932 FCD KJM P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, Warden,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se, challenging the loss of good time

credits stemming from a disciplinary hearing held on January 18, 2004. Plaintiff’s habeas

petition was filed with the court on May 12, 2005. The court’s own records reveal that on

November 17, 2004, plaintiff filed a petition attacking the same disciplinary hearing. (No. Civ.

S-04-2480 FCD KJM P ).1

 Due to the duplicative nature of the present action, the court will

recommend that the complaint in the action be dismissed.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action

be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the District Judge assigned

to this case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being

Case 2:05-cv-00932-FCD-KJM Document 7 Filed 04/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the

court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 13, 2007. 

2

reed0932.23

Case 2:05-cv-00932-FCD-KJM Document 7 Filed 04/13/07 Page 2 of 2