Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02211/USCOURTS-caed-2_21-cv-02211-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

White v. Sacramento, No. 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-DB

Joint Stipulation and Application for Amendment of the Pretrial Scheduling Order to Allow a

Limited Extension of the Discovery Deadlines - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TIFANEI N. MOYER, SBN 319721

MADELINE FLOOD, SBN 329388

LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS 

OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA

131 Steuart Street, Suite 400

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (916) 634-8687

Email: tresslmoyer@lccrsf.org; 

mflood@lccrsf.org

DAN SIEGEL, SBN 56400

EMILYROSE JOHNS, SBN 294319

SARA BELADI, SBN 348987

SIEGEL, YEE, BRUNNER & MEHTA

475 14th Street, Suite 500

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 839-1200

Facsimile: (510) 444-6698

Email: danmsiegel@gmail.com 

emilyrose@siegelyee.com; 

sbeladi@protonmail.com

CYNTHIA L. RICE, SBN 87630

AVIANCE D. BROWN, Pro Hac Vice

CIVIL RIGHTS EDUCATION AND

ENFORCEMENT CENTER

1245 E Colfax Ave., Suite 400

Denver, CO 80218

Telephone: (303) 757-7901

Email: crice@creeclaw.org; 

abrown@creeclaw.org

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MEGAN WHITE, JERONIMO AGUILAR, 

LOREN WAYNE KIDD, LYRIC NASH, 

NICOLLETTE JONES, and ODETTE ZAPATA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MEGAN WHITE, JERONIMO AGUILAR,

LOREN WAYNE KIDD, LYRIC NASH,

NICOLLETTE JONES, and ODETTE ZAPATA,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE

CITY OF SACRAMENTO; DANIEL HAHN;

and DOES 1-200 (the names and numbers of

which are currently unknown),

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-DB

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF 

THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

TO ALLOW A LIMITED EXTENSION OF 

THE DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Case 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-SCR Document 46 Filed 06/20/23 Page 1 of 5
White v. Sacramento, No. 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-DB

Joint Stipulation and Application for Amendment of the Pretrial Scheduling Order to Allow a

Limited Extension of the Discovery Deadlines - 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) and Civil Local Rules 144(a), Plaintiffs Megan White, 

Jeronimo Aguilar, Loren Wayne Kidd, Lyric Nash, Nicollette Jones, and Odette Zapata

(“plaintiffs”) and Defendants the City of Sacramento, the Sacramento Police Department, and 

Daniel Hahn (“defendants”), collectively “the parties”, by and through their respective counsel of 

record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on August 10, 2022, the Court issued a Pretrial Scheduling Order (“Order”)

(Dkt. No. 34);

WHEREAS, the Order provided that all expert witness disclosures shall be completed by 

July 3, 2023, that any rebuttal experts shall be disclosed by August 11, 2023, and that fact

discovery shall be completed by September 29, 2023;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs and defendants have not filed any prior stipulations or requests to 

extend the discovery and expert witness disclosure deadlines provided for by the Pretrial 

Scheduling Order;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs noticed the deposition of the City of Sacramento pursuant to Rule 

30(b)(6) on December 27, 2022, including various topics of inquiry requiring the preparation and 

presentation of various different individual deponents;

WHEREAS, following several months of meeting and conferring, the parties reached 

agreement on the scope of the examination of the witnesses and the appropriate witnesses for 

30(b)(6) deposition topics, allowing plaintiffs to schedule various depositions for June 2023; 

WHEREAS, defendants have substituted new counsel in this case just weeks ago, resulting 

in the cancellation of the majority of the scheduled depositions;

WHEREAS, the parties will require fact discovery to be completed before their experts can 

opine on relevant subjects;

WHEREAS, the parties are still interested in pursuing meaningful settlement discussions

and believe that extending the discovery deadlines will promote those efforts;

WHEREAS, this joint request is being made in the interests of judicial economy and in good 

Case 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-SCR Document 46 Filed 06/20/23 Page 2 of 5
White v. Sacramento, No. 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-DB

Joint Stipulation and Application for Amendment of the Pretrial Scheduling Order to Allow a

Limited Extension of the Discovery Deadlines - 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

faith and will not prejudice any party;

WHEREAS this stipulated extension will not change the current motion hearing schedule, 

or pre-trial conference or trial dates;

WHEREAS the parties have shown good cause for the stipulated extensions to fact and 

expert discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), in light of the parties’ diligent efforts on 

discovery to date, in light of recent counsel changes necessitating cancellation of scheduled 

depositions, and in light of the parties’ desire to participate in meaningful settlement discussions 

over the coming months. 

NOW THEREFORE, plaintiffs and defendants hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of 

this Court for good cause shown, that:

1. The deadline for parties’ completion of discovery shall be extended to December 1, 

2023.

2. The deadline for parties’ disclosure of expert witnesses shall be extended to 

December 15, 2023. 

3. The deadline for parties’ disclosure of rebuttal experts shall be extended to January 

19, 2024. 

4. All other deadlines established in the August 10, 2022 Pretrial Scheduling Order 

(Dkt. No. 34) remain unchanged.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: June 16, 2023 SIEGEL, YEE, BRUNNER & MEHTA

/s/ Dan Siegel

DAN SIEGEL

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

MEGAN WHITE, JERONIMO AGUILAR, LOREN 

WAYNE KIDD, LYRIC NASH, NICOLLETTE 

JONES, and ODETTE ZAPATA

Case 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-SCR Document 46 Filed 06/20/23 Page 3 of 5
White v. Sacramento, No. 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-DB

Joint Stipulation and Application for Amendment of the Pretrial Scheduling Order to Allow a

Limited Extension of the Discovery Deadlines - 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: June 16, 2023 SACRAMENTO CITY ATTORNEY

/s/ Sean D. Richmond

SEAN D. RICHMOND

Attorneys for Defendants 

SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE

CITY OF SACRAMENTO; DANIEL HAHN

Case 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-SCR Document 46 Filed 06/20/23 Page 4 of 5
White v. Sacramento, No. 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-DB

Joint Stipulation and Application for Amendment of the Pretrial Scheduling Order to Allow a

Limited Extension of the Discovery Deadlines - 5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the Pretrial Scheduling 

Order, is MODIFIED as follows: 

(1) The deadline for parties’ completion of discovery shall be extended to December 1, 

2023.

(2) The deadline for parties’ disclosure of expert witnesses shall be extended to December 

15, 2023.

(3) The deadline for parties’ disclosure of rebuttal experts shall be extended to January 19, 

2024. 

(4) All other deadlines established in the August 10, 2022 Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt. 

No. 34) remain unchanged.

(5) Counsel shall contact Judge Mendez’ Courtroom Deputy, M York, via e-mail at 

myork@caed.uscourts.gov, prior to filing a stipulation and proposed order to continue 

the dates set forth in this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2023 /s/ John A. Mendez

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:21-cv-02211-JAM-SCR Document 46 Filed 06/20/23 Page 5 of 5