Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00951/USCOURTS-caed-2_03-cv-00951-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT YOUNG,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-03-0951 FCD JFM P

v.

PETER BRESLER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On July 11, 2007, this court issued a pretrial order that provided for objections to

be filed within fifteen days. On July 27, 2007, plaintiff filed a two page document entitled

“Plaintiff’s Objections to Pretrial Order.” However, this document did not contain any

individual objections to the pretrial order, but states:

Plaintiff do[es] not understand how to file objections to the

“Pretrial Order.” Plaintiff reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Rules

72-302, 72-303 and 72-304 and he do[es] not know if the enclosed

objections are proper, but plaintiff will do the best he can.

(Id. at 2.)

It appears that plaintiff may have intended to enclose objections with this filing. 

Good cause appearing, plaintiff will be granted an additional fifteen days to submit his

/////

Case 2:03-cv-00951-FCD-JFM Document 96 Filed 09/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

objections. If no further objections are filed, the order will become final without further order of

this court.

DATED: September 12, 2007.

/001; youn0951.eot

Case 2:03-cv-00951-FCD-JFM Document 96 Filed 09/12/07 Page 2 of 2