Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00074/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00074-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA EARL BECK, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

MIKE EVANS, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

1:06-CV-00074 AWI LJO HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION 

[Doc. #11]

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

AND DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS [DOC. #6]

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ENTER JUDGMENT 

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

On June 28, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation that

recommended Respondent’s motion to dismiss for violating the statute of limitations be GRANTED

and the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED with prejudice. This Findings and

Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings

and Recommendation were to be filed within fifteen (15) days of the date of service of the order. 

Over fifteen (15) days have passed and no party has filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

Case 1:06-cv-00074-AWI-LJO Document 12 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California cd 2

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings

and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued June 28, 2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2006 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00074-AWI-LJO Document 12 Filed 09/13/06 Page 2 of 2