Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-02402/USCOURTS-azd-4_14-cv-02402-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Ismael Genao, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Warden J.T. Shartle,1

Respondent.

No. CV-14-02402-TUC-FRZ

ORDER 

 Before the Court for consideration is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 

brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by pro se Petitioner Ismael Genao, and the Report 

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Court enter an 

order granting Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. 

 This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie A. Bowman, pursuant to the 

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), Rule 72, Fed.R.Civ.P., and Local Rules 72.1 and 72.2 

of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, for 

further proceedings and Report and Recommendation. 

 Magistrate Judge Bowman issued her Report and Recommendation on July 13, 

2015, recommending that the Court grant Respondent’s motion to dismiss and enter an 

order denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as moot. 

 The Report and Recommendation sets forth the factual and procedural background 

relevant to this action and a legal analysis addressing the lack of case and controversy. 

 

1

 Substituted for former Warden Louis W. Winn, Jr. pursuant to Rule 25(d), Fed.R.Civ.P. 

Case 4:14-cv-02402-FRZ Document 23 Filed 08/13/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Petitioner filed his federal habeas petition on October 6, 2014. (Doc. 1) The 

Court’s screening Order, filed April 1, 2015, ordered Respondent to file an answer to the 

petition. (Doc. 11) Petitioner was released from the custody of the Federal Bureau of 

Prisons on April 10, 2015. (Doc. 19-1) Respondent filed the present Motion to Dismiss 

for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction on May 27, 2015. (Doc. 19) All notices and filing 

have been returned as undeliverable to Petitioner following his release. No response in 

opposition to the motion to dismiss was filed. 

 The parties were advised that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

72(b)(2), any party may serve and file written objections within fourteen days of being 

served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation, and that a party may respond to 

the other party’s objections within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 

 The Court finds, after consideration of all matters presented and an independent 

review of the record herein, that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus shall be denied 

and this action shall be dismissed in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. 

 Based on the foregoing, 

 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) is hereby 

ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court;

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of 

Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 19) in GRANTED; 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) 

is DENIED as moot and this action is hereby DISMISSED; 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment 

accordingly. 

 Dated this 12th day of August, 2015. 

Case 4:14-cv-02402-FRZ Document 23 Filed 08/13/15 Page 2 of 2