Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01090/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-01090-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Jamisi Jermaine Calloway is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 13, 2013, the Court directed the United States Marshal to serve the complaint on 

Defendants Kelley, Talisman, Wang, Fritz, Schomer, Mazuk, Trinh, Bostanjian, and Syed. 

On February 20, 2014, Defendants Kelley and Wang filed an answer to the complaint. 

On August 14, 2014, the USM-285 service form was returned to the Court executed as to 

Defendant Pascua, along with a waiver of service of the summons. On February 25, 2014, Defendants 

Bostanjian and Syed filed an answer to the complaint. On February 27, 2014, Defendants Mazur and 

Schomer filed an answer to the complaint. Defendants Talisman and Fritz have yet to make an 

appearance in the action, despite the return of service executed by the U.S. Marshal. 

Under Rule 4(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant who timely returns a 

waiver after being served with process has sixty days after the request was sent to serve an answer. 

JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY,

 Plaintiff,

v.

G. KELLEY, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:11-cv-01090-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE 

WHY ENTRY OF DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE 

ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANTS TALISMAN 

AND FRITZ 

[ECF No. 57]

Case 1:11-cv-01090-LJO-SAB Document 60 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Here, the waiver of service of summons was served upon Defendants Marc Talisman and Melissa Fritz 

on April 18, 2014, and an answer was due sixty days thereafter. 

Based on the fact that Defendants Talisman and Fritz have now been effectively served and no 

answers have been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause in writing within 

twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order why entry of default should not be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 4, 2014 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01090-LJO-SAB Document 60 Filed 09/04/14 Page 2 of 2