Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03033/USCOURTS-cand-4_05-cv-03033-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Oncology Therapeutics Network

Connection,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

Virginia Hematology Oncology

PLLC, a limited liability company;

Ronald Poulin, an individual, 

 Defendant(s).

_____________________________/

No. C 05-3033 WDB

 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE 

AND 

ADDRESSING

PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S

MAINTENANCE OF TIME RECORDS

On September 9, 2005, plaintiff filed an application for a Right to Attach Order and

for an Order For Issuance of Writ of Attachment. If defendants wish to object to plaintiff's

application, or to raise a claim of exemption, they must file a brief fully explaining the nature

of their objection or claim of exemption by September 28, 2005. This brief must (i)

identify the pertinent legal principles, quoting in full the statutes and other legal authority on

which they rely, (ii) describe all facts to which they claim the pertinent legal principles apply,

and (iii) submit evidence of those facts. To the extent that the submitted evidence consists

of declarations, those declarations must be based on personal knowledge and signed under

penalty of perjury.

If defendants object to plaintiff's application or raise a claim of exemption, plaintiff

must file a 'reply' brief by no later than October 5, 2005.

Case 4:05-cv-03033-WDB Document 23 Filed 09/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court notes that the Declaration of David J. Cook, Esq., in support of plaintiff's

application states that, "As a general matter, Declarant's office does not keep time records

herein, and therefore it is difficult to indicate the amount of time expended." See Cook

Declaration, ¶ 5. If plaintiff or plaintiff's counsel intend to seek a court award of attorneys

fees in this matter in excess of the $660.00 figure referenced in paragraph four of Mr. Cook's

declaration, plaintiff's counsel must keep contemporaneous, specific records reflecting the

nature of the work performed in this case, and the time spent on each task or event. 

Dated: September 14, 2005 

WAYNE D. BRAZIL

United States Magistrate Judge

Copies to: Parties, WDB.

Case 4:05-cv-03033-WDB Document 23 Filed 09/15/05 Page 2 of 2