Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02646/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-02646-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN JACKSON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-06-2646 LKK KJM P

vs.

ROBERT A. HOREL, Acting Warden,

et al., 

Respondents. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed February 16, 2007, petitioner was granted an extension of time

in which to either pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The

thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order and has

not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS

HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

/////

/////

Case 2:06-cv-02646-LKK-CHS Document 9 Filed 04/25/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 24, 2007.

jack2646.fff

Case 2:06-cv-02646-LKK-CHS Document 9 Filed 04/25/07 Page 2 of 2