Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-almd-2_10-cv-00287/USCOURTS-almd-2_10-cv-00287-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

---

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DAWN FRAZIER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:10cv287-MHT

) (WO) 

COLONIAL BANK, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

OPINION

Plaintiff Dawn Frazier filed this lawsuit against

defendants Colonial Bank, Branch Banking and Trust

Company (also known as BB&T), and the Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation (also known as FDIC), as receiver

for Colonial Bank. Frazier claims that, while an

employee of Colonial Bank, she was subjected to

retaliation, a hostile-work environment, race and gender

discrimination, and maternity-leave discrimination, in

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 1981a, 2000e to 2000e-17), and

the Family and Medical Leave Act (29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-

Case 2:10-cv-00287-MHT-WC Document 45 Filed 03/07/11 Page 1 of 2
2654). This matter is now before the court on the

recommendation of the magistrate judge that the FDIC’s

motion to substitute party should be granted; BB&T’s

motions to dismiss denied as moot; the FDIC’s motion to

dismiss granted; and this case dismissed in its entirety

for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Frazier has

filed objections to the recommendation. After an

independent and de novo review of the record, the court

concludes that Frazier’s objections should be overruled

and the magistrate judge’s recommendation adopted.

An appropriate judgment will be entered. 

DONE, this the 7th day of March, 2011.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-00287-MHT-WC Document 45 Filed 03/07/11 Page 2 of 2