Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03938/USCOURTS-cand-3_16-cv-03938-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS 

Lionel Z. Glancy (SBN #134180) 

Robert V. Prongay (SBN #270796) 

Joshua L. Crowell (SBN #295411) 

GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP 

1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Telephone: (310) 201-9150 

Facsimile: (310) 201-9160 

Email: rprongay@glancylaw.com 

J. Brandon Walker 

Todd H. Henderson 

BRAGAR EAGEL & SQUIRE, P.C. 

885 Third Avenue, Suite 3040 

New York, New York 10022 

Telephone: (212) 308-5858 

Facsimile: (212) 486-0462 

Email: walker@bespc.com 

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT CRAGO, Individually And On Behalf 

Of All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff,

v.

THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, 

CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., CHARLES 

R. SCHWAB, and WALTER W. BETTINGER 

II, 

Defendants.

 Case No. 3:16-cv-3938-RS 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Case 3:16-cv-03938-RS Document 45 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS 

Lead Plaintiffs Robert Wolfson and Frank Pino (“Lead Plaintiffs”) and Defendants The 

Charles Schwab Corp., Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Charles R. Schwab, and Walter W. Bettinger II 

(“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred and hereby 

stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulated order entered by the Court on November 18, 2016 

(ECF No. 41), Lead Plaintiffs’ amended complaint is due January 13, 2017; 

WHEREAS, due to the recent illnesses of certain attorneys handling the case for Co-Lead 

Counsel, Lead Plaintiffs sought Defendants’ consent to a one-week extension of time to file the 

amended complaint; 

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants have met and conferred about extending all 

deadlines previously stipulated to in this action by one week and the parties mutually agree, with the 

Court’s approval, that the new deadlines shall be as follows: 

January 20, 2017: Lead Plaintiffs Filing Amended Complaint 

March 10, 2017: Schwab’s Motion to Dismiss 

April 21, 2017: Lead Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Schwab’s Motion 

May 19, 2017: Schwab’s Reply 

WHEREAS, the parties further agree that in light of the foregoing circumstances and in the 

interest of judicial efficiency, administration and justice, as well as conservation of judicial and 

private resources, the Initial Case Management Conference should be continued until after the Court 

has decided Schwab’s motion to dismiss and there is an operative complaint on file; and 

WHEREAS, this is the parties’ first request for an extension of any deadline in this case. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, SUBJECT TO 

APPROVAL BY THIS COURT, by these parties through their respective counsel of record, as 

follows: 

1. Lead Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a new complaint will be January 20, 2017; 

2. Schwab’s deadline to file its motion to dismiss will be March 10, 2017; 

Case 3:16-cv-03938-RS Document 45 Filed 01/12/17 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS 

3. Lead Plaintiffs’ deadline to file its opposition to Schwab’s motion will be 

April 21, 2017; 

4. Schwab’s deadline to file its reply to its motion will be May 19, 2017; 

5. The initial case management conference and all accompanying deadlines will be 

continued until after the Court decides Schwab’s motion to dismiss and there is an operative 

complaint on file; and 

6. The parties do not seek to reset these dates for the purpose of delay. The proposed 

new dates will not have an effect on any pre-trial and trial dates as the Court has yet to schedule 

these dates. 

SO STIPULATED. 

Case 3:16-cv-03938-RS Document 45 Filed 01/12/17 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS 

 

Dated: January 12, 2017 GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP

By: /s/ Joshua L. Crowell 

Robert V. Prongay (#270796) 

Joshua L. Crowell (#295411) 

1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Telephone: (310) 201-9150 

Facsimile: (310) 201-9160 

Email: info@glancylaw.com 

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the 

Class

BRAGAR EAGEL & SQUIRE, P.C. 

By: /s/ J. Brandon Walker 

J. Brandon Walker 

Todd H. Henderson 

885 Third Avenue, Suite 3040 

New York, New York 10022 

Telephone: (212) 308-5858 

Facsimile: (212) 486-0462 

walker@bespc.com

henderson@bespc.com 

Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the 

Class

Dated: January 12, 2017 ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER

LLP

By: /s/ Gilbert R. Serota 

Gilbert R. Serota 

Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-4024 

Telephone: (415) 471-3170 

Facsimile: (415) 471-3400 

gilbert.serota@apks.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 3:16-cv-03938-RS Document 45 Filed 01/12/17 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 4 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No. 16-cv-3938-RS 

ATTESTATION 

I, Joshua L. Crowell, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 

file this Proposed Order of Consolidation. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest 

that Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs, Robert Wolfson and Frank Pino, concurs in this filing. 

DATED: January 12, 2017 /s/ Joshua L. Crowell

JOSHUA L. CROWELL 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Based on the parties’ stipulation and the good cause described therein, the Court GRANTS 

this stipulation. The following schedule shall apply: 

January 20, 2017: Plaintiffs’ Deadline To File A New Complaint 

March 10, 2017: Schwab’s Deadline To File A Motion To Dismiss 

April 21, 2017: Plaintiffs’ Deadline To File An Opposition to Schwab’s 

Motion

May 19, 2017: Schwab’s Deadline To File Reply 

The Court orders that the initial case management conference and all accompanying 

deadlines will be continued until after the Court decides Schwab’s motion to dismiss; 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: __________________ 

Hon. Richard Seeborg 

U.S. District Court Judge 

1/12/17

Case 3:16-cv-03938-RS Document 45 Filed 01/12/17 Page 5 of 5