Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00707/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00707-13/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASSOCIATION OF IRRITATED )

RESIDENTS, an unincorporated )

association, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

FRED SCHAKEL DAIRY, a )

California Proprietorship, )

FRED SCHAKEL, owner and )

operator, SCHAKEL FAMILY )

PARTNERSHIP, a California )

Limited Partnership, owner )

and operator, AG RESOURCES )

III, a California Limited )

Liability Company, owner, )

and SOUTH LAKES DIARY, a )

California general partnership,)

owner and operator, )

)

Defendants. )

 )

1:05-cv-00707-OWW-SMS 

INFORMATIONAL ORDER

RE: TELEPHONIC DISCOVERY

DISPUTE RE: PLAINTIFF’S SITE

INSPECTION AT DEFENDANT’S

DAIRY

The Court held an informal telephonic discovery dispute on

August 31, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. Brent J. Newell, Esq., appeared

telephonically on behalf of plaintiff. David D. Doyle, Esq., and

Lee N. Smith, Esq., appeared telephonically on behalf of

defendant(s). The Court advised counsel of the following ruling:

Case 1:05-cv-00707-LJO-SMS Document 163 Filed 09/04/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The Court will allow the testing and examination as proposed

by plaintiff, including duration, location of testing vehicles

and equipment, etc.

The Court hereby ORDERS that all testing done in the context

of this lawsuit, testing conducted from September 19-22, 2007,

and all findings and conclusions derived therefrom shall be for

the exclusive use in this lawsuit. No reports, recommendations

nor any findings and conclusions shall be distributed to anyone

outside of the confines of this lawsuit, either during the

pendency of this lawsuit nor any time thereafter, for any purpose

whatsoever without specific order of this Court.

Any and all reports, recommendations and/or conclusions

produced based on the testing of September 19-22, 2007, by

plaintiff’s experts shall be for experts’ in this lawsuit,

involved attorneys’ and said attorneys’ staff persons’ and

parties’ eyes only, and shall not be published in any manner nor

at any time in any publication or used for any administrative

purpose outside of the confines of this lawsuit now or at any

time in the future except by order of this Court.

This Court further advised that the costs and fees generated

directly because of and in conjunction with these specific tests

shall be subject to the strictest of scrutiny, subject to motion

as to their appropriateness and relevancy based on the specific

causes of action and defenses plead in this lawsuit only.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED 8/31/2007 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00707-LJO-SMS Document 163 Filed 09/04/07 Page 2 of 2