Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01588/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-01588-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 463
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAR YANG, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

ATTORNEY GENERAL et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:09-CV-01588 MJS HC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Petitioner is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

On April 15, 2010, the Court issued and served on Petitioner an order informing

Petitioner that the instant case had been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. On

April 26, 2010, the order served on Petitioner was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as

undeliverable.

Pursuant to Local Rule 183(b), a party appearing in propria persona is required to keep

the court apprised of his or her current address at all times. Local Rule 183(b) provides, in

pertinent part:

If mail directed to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk is

Case 1:09-cv-01588-MJS Document 11 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

U.S. District Court

 E. D. California -2-

returned by the U.S. Postal Service, and if such plaintiff fails to

notify the Court and opposing parties within sixty-three (63) days

thereafter of a current address, the Court may dismiss the action

without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Without the ability to communicate with Petitioner, the Court is unable to maintain and

faithfully adjudicate the present matter. Over sixty-three (63) days have passed and Petitioner

has not informed the Court and any opposing parties of his present address.

ORDER

Accordingly, Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his petition should not be

dismissed for failure to prosecute based on Petitioner’s failure to inform the Court of his

current address. Petitioner is ORDERED to inform the Court and any opposing counsel of his

current address within fourteen (14) days of service of this order. 

Petitioner is forewarned that failure to follow this order will result in dismissal of the

petition without prejudice pursuant to Local Rules 110 and 183(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 16, 2010 /s/Michael J. Seng 

ci4d6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-01588-MJS Document 11 Filed 07/19/10 Page 2 of 2