Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06127/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-06127-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX

MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,

 /

This document relates to:

Aritha Marshall, 06-6127 CRB

___________________________________/

No. MDL 05-01699 CRB

ORDER RE: MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL AND FOR

PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

Now pending for decision is the motion of the law firm of Lopez, Hodes, Restaino,

Milman & Skikos to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff Aritha Marshall. After carefully

considering the motion, and the supporting affidavit, the Court ORDERS PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE as to why (1) counsels’ motion to withdraw should not be granted; and (2)

plaintiff’s lawsuit should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. 

If plaintiff wishes to contest the withdrawal of counsel and/or dismissal of the plaintiff’s

lawsuit for failure to prosecute, plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing on or before June

22, 2007 of the reasons the withdrawal should not be granted or the case dismissed. In

particular, if plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, she shall advise the Court of the

name and address of her new counsel or, if she will be representing herself, she must advise

the Court of her current contact information. Plaintiff is warned that her failure to 

Case 3:06-cv-06127-CRB Document 36 Filed 06/04/07 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\showcauseorders\lopezosc3.wpd 2

communicate with the Court in writing as set forth above may result in dismissal of her

action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 4, 2007 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-06127-CRB Document 36 Filed 06/04/07 Page 2 of 2