Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06637/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-06637-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CARDONET, INC., a corporation

Plaintiff,

v.

IMB INC., a corporation, and DOES 1 

through 25, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: CV 06-06637 (RMW)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO 

PROVIDE SUPPLMENTAL 

DISCOVERY RESPONSES

WHEREAS Defendant IBM filed a motion to compel further responses to Defendant’s First 

Set of Interrogatories, and

WHEREAS Plaintiff did not oppose Defendant’s Motion, and on or about February 8, 2008, 

the Court issued an order instructing Plaintiff to serve supplemental responses to Defendant’s 

interrogatories no later than February 15, 2008, and

WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel conferred with Defendants’ counsel and requested an 

additional 5 days to finalize and serve the supplemental responses, and Defendants’ agreed to 

Plaintiff’s request subject to Court approval, the parties therefore, by and through their respective 

FREDERICK J. GEONETTA, ESQ. (#114824)

THOMAS MARC LITTON, ESQ. (#119985)

LITTON & GEONETTA, LLP

120 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel: (415) 421-4770

Fax: (415) 421-4785

KENNETH FRUCHT, ESQ. (#178881)

LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH FRUCHT

120 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel: (415) 392-4844

Fax: (415) 392-79-73

ATTORNEYS FOR CARDONET

Case 5:06-cv-06637-RMW Document 88 Filed 02/19/08 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

counsel, agree that Plaintiff shall provide complete, non-evasive supplemental responses to 

Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 of Defendant’s First Set of 

Interrogatories no later that Wednesday, February 20, 2008.

DATED: February 15, 2008

__________/s/_______________

Kenneth Frucht

Attorney for Plaintiff Cardonet

_________/s/________________

Bruce Van Dalsem

Attorney for Defendant IBM

IT IS SO ORDERED

_________________________

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

 

Case 5:06-cv-06637-RMW Document 88 Filed 02/19/08 Page 2 of 2