Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00484/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00484-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

Stipulation; Order 1

53638.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL D. NELSON, SBN 171359 

COSTA KERESTENZIS, SBN 1816125 

BEESON, TAYER & BODINE, APC. 

1404 Franklin St., Fifth Floor 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 625-9700 

Facsimile: (510) 625-8275 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOE ROMERO, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

PRODUCERS DAIRY FOODS, INC., A 

California Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 1:05-CV-00484-DLB 

STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO 

CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 

 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, the parties to the above-referenced action 

hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court’s Pre-trial Scheduling Order, dated August 10, 

2006, be amended so that the discovery cut-off date in this matter be continued from January 12, 2007 to 

February 16, 2007, the current date for the completion of expert discovery. 

 The parties agree that this request should not in any way effect the other Scheduling Dates in this 

matter, including the trial date, and contend there is good cause for this request as follows: 

1. The parties agree that this case will have limited experts, if any. Accordingly, continuing the 

general discovery cut-off will not adversely impact completing expert discovery. Moreover, 

Case 1:05-cv-00484-DLB Document 94 Filed 01/08/07 Page 1 of 3
Stipulation; Order 2

53638.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

completion of discovery by February 16, 2007 will allow the parties sufficient time to 

prepare and file any dispositive motions they intend to file for hearing by March 26, 2007. 

2. Additional time is requested because the parties intend to take a number of depositions and 

scheduling such depositions during the Holiday season has been extremely difficult given the 

deponents’ schedules. 

3. Additional time will allow the parties to better evaluate the depositions as they are being 

completed, thus allowing for increased settlement discussions. 

In sum, the parties request a short continuance so that the discovery can be completed without 

prejudice to any party, or unnecessary burden on any deponent. 

Dated: December 6, 2006 Respectfully Submitted, 

BEESON, TAYER & BODINE, APC 

By: _______/s/_________________________ 

 COSTA KERESTENZIS 

 Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS 

Dated: December 6, 2006 Respectfully Submitted, 

LITTLER MENDELSON 

By: _______/s/_________________________ 

 SPENCER HIPP 

 Attorneys for DEFENDANT 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 1:05-cv-00484-DLB Document 94 Filed 01/08/07 Page 2 of 3
Stipulation; Order 3

53638.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

 Upon consideration of the parties’ stipulation and request and with good cause appearing, 

the last day to complete discovery in this matter is hereby continued from January 12, 2007 to 

February 16, 2007. 

January 8, 2007 __/s/ Dennis L. Beck_________________ 

 DENNIS L. BECK, 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:05-cv-00484-DLB Document 94 Filed 01/08/07 Page 3 of 3