Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01987/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-01987-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

JON A. HEABERLIN (SBN 199810)

SUJATA T. REUTER (SBN 232148)

ROBERT B. BURCHFIEL (SBN 112318)

RANKIN | STOCK | HEABERLIN

96 No. Third Street, Suite 500

San Jose, California 95112-7709

Telephone : (408) 293-0463

Facsimile : (408) 293-9514

Emails: jheaberlin@rllss.com

 sreuter@rllss.com

Attorneys for Defendants:

CITY OF SANTA CLARA; CHIEF SELLERS;

CARREIRA, HENRY, CLOUSE, HILL,

HOSMAN, RUSH, MEAD, STEPHENS, C.

BELL, STEWART, NIESEN, THOMPSON,

GERBRANDT, CARDIN, DEGER, D. BELL,

AMOS, and MARTIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MUHAMMAD MONEEB;

MUHAMMAD IKRAM; HAZAKAT

IKRAM,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF SANTA CLARA; CHIEF

SELLERS; CARREIRA, HENRY,

CLOUSE, HILL, HOSMAN, RUSH,

MEAD, STEPHENS, C. BELL,

STEWART, NIESEN, THOMPSON,

GERBRANDT, CARDIN, DEGER, D.

BELL, AMOS, and MARTIN; et al.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 5:15-cv-1987 NC

3 Click here to copy title to footer

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs MUHAMMAD MONEEB, MUHAMMAD IKRAM, and HAZAKAT IKRAM, and

Defendants CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CHIEF SELLERS, CARREIRA, HENRY, CLOUSE,

HILL, HOSMAN, RUSH, MEAD, STEPHENS, C. BELL, STEWART, NIESEN,

Case 5:15-cv-01987-NC Document 39 Filed 01/06/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

THOMPSON, GERBRANDT, CARDIN, DEGER, D. BELL, AMOS, and MARTIN, by and

through their counsel of record, do hereby stipulate as follows:

1. A settlement conference before Hon. Paul S. Grewal was originally scheduled to

occur on January 22, 2016. However, Judge Grewal requested that the conference

be reset due to a scheduling conflict. The parties and Judge Grewal have agreed to

a new settlement conference date and time of February 10, 2016, at 10:00am.

2. A case management conference is currently scheduled for the same date and time.

3. The parties request that this court continue the case management conference to

some later date convenient to the court in order to accommodate the new settlement

conference date and time.

4. The parties believe that continuance of the case management conference would be

the most efficient course of action because, if the case resolves, a subsequent case

management conference may not be necessary.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: January 6, 2016 HADDAD & SHERWIN

By: /s/ Julia Sherwin

JULIA SHERWIN

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: January 6, 2016 RANKIN | STOCK | HEABERLIN

By: /s/ Sujata T. Reuter

SUJATA T. REUTER

Attorney for Defendants

ORDER

The court, having reviewed the Stipulation by and between the parties, hereby finds

that good cause exists, and orders that:

The February 10, 2016, Case Management Conference date is vacated. The Case

Management Conference will be held on _________________, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.

Date: _______________ _______________________________

HON. NATHANAEL COUSINS

Case 5:15-cv-01987-NC Document 39 Filed 01/06/16 Page 2 of 2