Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01500/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01500-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAXIMO RIVERA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SAN PABLO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-01500-MEJ 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On April 1, 2015, Plaintiff Maximo Rivera filed the instant complaint. To date, no proof 

of service of the summons and complaint has been filed. “If a defendant is not served within 120 

days after the complaint is filed, the court – on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff –

must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made 

within a specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 4(m), the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause, in writing 

and no later than July 7, 2015, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to serve within the 

time required by Rule 4(m). Notice is hereby provided to Plaintiff that the Court may dismiss this

case if no responsive declaration is filed. Thus, it is imperative that the Court receive a written

response by the deadline above.

The July 2, 2015 Case Management Conference is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 29, 2015

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01500-MEJ Document 8 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 1