Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01534/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-01534-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Injunction

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

SC1 17086352.1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING LIMITED EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

James M. Nelson (SBN 116442) 

Diana R. Craig (SBN 221389) 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 

Sacramento, California 95814-4428 

Telephone: (916) 448-0159 

Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION and WALT OLESKI 

LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY H. OCHRACH 

Jeffrey H. Ochrach (SBN 131027) 

Timothy J. Hennessy (SBN 233595) 

3001 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 220 

Roseville, California 95661 

Telephone: (916) 784-1200 

Facsimile: (916) 784-7099 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INTERLOC SOLUTIONS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

INTERLOC SOLUTIONS, INC. 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 

INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, WALT 

OLESKI, CHARLES JOHNSON, CHRIS 

RHODES, MICHAEL NUTT and DOES 1 

THROUGH 10, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2:07-CV-01534-LEW-GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING LIMITED EXPEDITED 

DISCOVERY 

Judge: Hon. Gregory G. Hollows 

STIPULATION 

Plaintiff INTERLOC SOLUTIONS, INC. and defendants TECHNOLOGY 

ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and WALT OLESKI (“parties”) by and 

through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate, agree, and request that the Court 

enter an order thereon, as follows: 

Case 2:07-cv-01534-LEW-GGH Document 76 Filed 09/12/07 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

SC1 17086352.1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING LIMITED EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 

(a) The parties agree that defendants may propound limited discovery in advance if the 

Rule 26(f) conference as described below. 

(b) Defendants may immediately propound written discovery to plaintiff regarding the 

status of Interloc's relationships with the 34 customers identified in Exhibit A to the Declaration 

of Michael Watson dated August 17, 2007. 

(c) This discovery will include a request for production of documents, a request for 

admissions, and special interrogatories. 

(d) Interloc can redact any confidential information in the documents it produces or the 

parties may otherwise arrange and agree to another method to maintain confidentiality. 

(e) Interloc will have fifteen (15) days to respond to defendants’ written discovery. 

DATED: September 11, 2007 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

By _/s/ Diana R. Craig____________________

James M. Nelson 

Diana R. Craig 

Attorneys for Defendants 

TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 

INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and 

WALT OLESKI 

DATED: September 11, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY H. OCHRACH 

By _/s/ Timothy J. Hennessy_______________ 

 Jeffrey H. Ochrach 

 Timothy J. Hennessy 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

INTERLOC SOLUTIONS, INC. 

Case 2:07-cv-01534-LEW-GGH Document 76 Filed 09/12/07 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

SC1 17086352.1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING LIMITED EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 9/12/07 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:07-cv-01534-LEW-GGH Document 76 Filed 09/12/07 Page 3 of 3