Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00583/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00583-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

LAI- 2196427v1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 

Re One-Day Extension of Time for Filing of 

Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss 

2:05-cv-00583-LKK-GGH 

Daniel D. McMillan (State Bar No. 135119) 

Erich R. Luschei (State Bar No. 125956) 

JONES DAY 

555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4600 

Los Angeles, CA 90013-1025 

Telephone: (213) 489-3939 

Facsimile: (213) 243-2539 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UTILITY ENGINEERING CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION 

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 

UTILITY DISTRICT, a municipal 

utility district; UTILITY 

ENGINEERING CORPORATION, a 

Texas corporation,

Defendant. 

___________________________________

AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM. 

Case No. 2:05-cv-00583-LKK-GGH (Related 

to Case No. S-05-617 LKK/GGH) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ONEDAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING 

OF REPLY MEMORANDUM IN 

SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS 

DATE: July 18, 2005 

TIME: 10:00 a.m. 

DEPT.: Courtroom 4 

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton 

 

Case 2:05-cv-00583-LKK -GGH Document 77 Filed 07/11/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

LAI-2196427v1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 

Re One-Day Extension of Time for Filing of 

Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss 2 

2:05-cv-00583-LKK-GGH 

Defendant UTILITY ENGINEERING CORP. (“UEC”), hereby submits to the Court, by 

and through its respective counsel of record, the following stipulation and proposed order 

regarding a one-day extension of time for the filing of UEC’s Reply Memorandum of Points and 

Authorities in Support of its Motion to Dismiss (“Reply Memorandum”). 

WHEREAS, UEC’s Reply Memorandum is due on July 11, 2005; 

WHEREAS, UEC’s counsel tasked with the briefing on UEC’s Motion to Dismiss, Erich 

R. Luschei of Jones Day, is unavailable due to an unexpected personal emergency; 

WHEREAS, in light of Mr. Luschei’s unavailability, UEC requires a one-day extension 

of time for the filing of its Reply Memorandum; and 

WHEREAS, plaintiff FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION consents to the 

requested extension, as evidenced by its signature below. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate: 

1. The filing due date for UEC’s Reply Memorandum shall be extended one day to 

July 12, 2005. 

Dated: July 11, 2005 JONES DAY 

By:_/s/ Daniel D. McMillan 

Daniel D. McMillan 

Counsel for Defendant 

UTILITY ENGINEERING CORPORATION 

Dated: July 11, 2005 MOORE & LEE, LLP 

By:_/s/ Robert M. Moore 

Robert M. Moore 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

FRU-CON CONSTRUCTION 

CORPORATION 

Case 2:05-cv-00583-LKK -GGH Document 77 Filed 07/11/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

LAI-2196427v1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 

Re One-Day Extension of Time for Filing of 

Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss 3 

2:05-cv-00583-LKK-GGH 

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the Court hereby approves the stipulation and orders that the filing 

due date for defendant Utility Engineering Corp.’s Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities 

in Support of its Motion to Dismiss shall be extended one day to July 12, 2005. 

Dated: July 11, 2005 

 /s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

 Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton 

 United States District Court 

 

Case 2:05-cv-00583-LKK -GGH Document 77 Filed 07/11/05 Page 3 of 3