Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00246/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-00246-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 625
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

2003 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER,

VIN: SALME 11443A132891, LICENSE

NUMBER: 5BNH073,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

1:06-cv-0246 OWW TAG

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER

I. Date of Scheduling Conference.

October 13, 2006.

II. Appearances Of Counsel.

Stephanie Hamilton Borchers, Esq., Assistant Untied States

Attorney, appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

Gloria Zarco, Esq., appeared on behalf of Lienholder Land

Rover Capital Group. 

III. Summary of Pleadings. 

1. This is an in rem civil forfeiture action. In its

Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem, the government alleges

that the Defendant vehicle constitutes a conveyance used or

intended to be used to transport, or to facilitate the

Case 1:06-cv-00246-OWW -TAG Document 28 Filed 10/16/06 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

transportation, sale, receipt, possession, or concealment of a

controlled substance and is subject to forfeiture to the United

States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(4). 

2. The Defendant 2003 Land Rover Range Rover, VIN:

salme11443a132891, License Number 5BNH073 (hereinafter the

“Defendant vehicle”), was seized on July 27, 2005, on land in the

Eastern District of California by the Drug Enforcement

Administration (“DEA”). On March 17, 2006, the Defendant vehicle

was arrested pursuant tothe Warrant and Summons of Arrest issued

by U.S. Magistrate Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill. The action was

published on April 6, 2006, in The Daily Report (Kern County)

pursuant to the Order of Publication filed March 12, 2006. The

Proof of Publication was filed on April 17, 2006.

3. On or about March 10, 2006, the government sent copies

of the Complaint, Application, and Order for Publication, Warrant

and Summons for Arrest, Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling

Conference, Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge standing

order in all civil cases assigned to U.S. District Judge Oliver

W. Wanger and Notice of Availability Voluntary Dispute Resolution

to Ray C. Sharpe at 4625 Wynn Rd., Ste. #223, Las Vegas, NV 89103

by certified mail receipt number 7002 2030 0001 4136 1796. On or

about April 4, 2006, the United States Attorney’s Office received

the certified mail receipt signed received by Ray Sharpe.

4. Additionally on March 20, 2006, a Deputy U.S. Marshal

attempted to personally serve copies of the above listed

documents, on Ray C. Sharpe at his last known address located at

1090 S. 3rd Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91911. The address was a

strip mall and the Deputy U.S. Marshal was unable to serve Mr.

Case 1:06-cv-00246-OWW -TAG Document 28 Filed 10/16/06 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Sharpe.

5. On or about May 2, 2006, counsel for Plaintiff was

contacted by the law firm of Byers & Warrick, seeking an

extension of time to file a claim and answer on behalf of Mr.

Sharpe. Plaintiff granted Mr. Sharpe an extension until July 17. 

On July 17, Plaintiff was contacted by Daniel Ponce of Byers &

Warrick seeking an additional one week extension on Mr. Sharpe’s

behalf. Mr. Ponce indicated they needed the additional time to

determine whether Mr. Sharpe wanted to pursue a claim. To date,

no claim or answer has been filed by Mr. Sharpe and no further

extension of time has been sought by mr. Sharpe or any attorney

on Mr. Sharpe’s behalf.

6. On May 3, 2006, Richard Alexander Garcia was personally

served with copies of the Complaint, Application and Order for

Publication, Warrant and Summons for Arrest, order Setting

Mandatory Scheduling Conference, Notice of Availability of

Magistrate Judge, standing order in all civil cases assigned to

U.S. District Judge Oliver W. Wanger and Notice of Availability

Voluntary Dispute Resolution. 

7. Lien holder Land Rover Capital Group (hereinafter

“Capital Group”), has filed a claim and answer in this action

claiming an interest in the Defendant vehicle. Capital Group

intends to request an expedited settlement with the government.

8. To date, no other potential claimants have filed a

claim or answer in this action.

9. The government intends to file Requests for Clerk’s

Defaults as to both Ray C. Sharpe and Richard Alexander Garcia.

///

Case 1:06-cv-00246-OWW -TAG Document 28 Filed 10/16/06 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

IV. Orders Re Amendments To Pleadings.

1. The parties do not anticipate filing any amendments to

the pleadings at this time. 

V. Factual Summary.

A. Admitted Facts Which Are Deemed Proven Without Further

Proceedings. 

1. No one has yet contested the facts alleged in the

Complaint. 

B. Contested Facts.

1. No one has yet contested the facts alleged in the

Complaint. 

VI. Legal Issues.

A. Uncontested.

1. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and

1355 and 28 U.S.C. § 881. 

2. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1395.

B. Contested. 

1. All remaining legal issues are contested. 

VII. Status of Case. 

1. No party other than the Lienholder has appeared. The

Plaintiff and the Lienholder are presently negotiating and expect

to be able to resolve their respective claims. 

2. The government plans to request the entry of default of

any other claimants. 

3. Accordingly, the parties shall notify the Court if and

when they have reached a settlement. The Plaintiff shall proceed

to request the entry of default of any non-appearing claimants.

4. Plaintiff shall notify the Court respecting any future

Case 1:06-cv-00246-OWW -TAG Document 28 Filed 10/16/06 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

need for court action after the default process has been

completed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 13, 2006 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00246-OWW -TAG Document 28 Filed 10/16/06 Page 5 of 5