Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-01811/USCOURTS-cand-4_10-cv-01811-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- 

WEST\222824652.1 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01811 RS (EMC) 

LUANNE SACKS, Bar No. 120811 

luanne.sacks@dlapiper.com 

CARTER W. OTT, Bar No. 221660 

carter.ott@dlapiper.com 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

555 Mission Street, Suite 2400 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Tel: 415.836.2500 

Fax: 415.836.2501 

Attorneys for Defendant 

SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT 

AMERICA LLC (erroneously sued as “Sony 

Computer Entertainment America Inc.”) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re SONY PS3 “OTHER OS” 

LITIGATION 

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01811 (EMC) 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE 

Case 4:10-cv-01811-YGR Document 120 Filed 12/16/10 Page 1 of 3
DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- 

WEST\222824652.1 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01811 RS (EMC) 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: 

WHEREAS, the parties have reached an impasse regarding several discovery issues that 

now require the Court’s resolution. Specifically, the parties have met and conferred without 

success regarding multiple outstanding discovery items. Consequently, Defendant Sony 

Computer Entertainment America LLC (“SCEA”) will move to compel testimony, information 

and production of documents and things by Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs’ Initial Disclosures; and 

conversely, Plaintiffs will file a motion to compel and seek a protective order regarding certain 

discovery sought by SCEA (collectively, the “Discovery Motions”). 

WHEREAS, to expedite these disputes so as not to avoid further delay, the parties have 

agreed to the following expedited briefing schedule regarding the Discovery Motions, subject to 

the Court’s approval. 

 IT IS HEREBY AGREED TO AS FOLLOWS: 

The parties’ pending discovery disputes will be briefed and heard pursuant to the 

following schedule: 

December 15, 2010: Discovery Motions filed and served. 

 January 14, 2011: Opposition Briefs filed and served. 

 January 26, 2011: Reply Briefs filed and served. 

 February 9, 2011, 10:30 a.m.: Hearing regarding Discovery Motions. 

 Should the Court set a date after February 9, 2011 for hearing on the Discovery Motions, 

Opposition Briefs must be filed and served 28 days before such hearing date and Reply Briefs 

must be filed and served 14 days before such hearing date. 

Dated: December 13, 2010 

FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP 

By: /s/ Rosemary M. Rivas 

Rosemary M. Rivas 

Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel 

Case 4:10-cv-01811-YGR Document 120 Filed 12/16/10 Page 2 of 3
DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

SAN FRANCISCO

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-3- 

WEST\222824652.1 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01811 RS (EMC) 

Dated: December 13, 2010 

__________________________________

______ CALVO & CLARK, LLP 

By: /s/ James Calvo 

James Calvo 

 Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel 

Dated: December 13, 2010 

HAUSFELD LLP 

By: /s/ James Pizzirusso 

James Pizzirusso 

 Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel 

Dated: December 13, 2010 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

By: /s/ Luanne Sacks 

Luanne Sacks 

Counsel for defendant Sony Computer 

Entertainment America LLC 

 I, Luanne Sacks, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to 

file the foregoing Joint Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing Schedule. I hereby 

attest that the above-referenced signatories to this stipulation have concurred in this filing. 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

By: 

Honorable Edward M. Chen 

United States Magistrate Judge 

12/16/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 4:10-cv-01811-YGR Document 120 Filed 12/16/10 Page 3 of 3