Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-1_08-cv-03335/USCOURTS-cand-1_08-cv-03335-11/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 110
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

---

1

ORDER DENYING SCOTTSDALE'S MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION 

CASE NO. 08-CV-3335 NJV 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EUREKA DIVISION 

CLARENCE JONATHON WOOD and HEIDI 

COLLINGWOOD, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

SCOTTSDALE INDEMNITY CO.; and 

DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 08-CV-3335 NJV 

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S 

REQUEST TO FILE STATEMENT OF 

RECENT DECISION 

 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Scottsdale Indemnity 

Company's Motion To File Statement of Recent Decision ("Motion"). 

The Court, having already considered the Second District Court of 

Appeals' January 21, 2010 opinion Superior Dispatch Inc. v. 

Insurance Corp. of New York, 2010 WL 187957 in its ruling on the 

parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, finds the Motion to 

be moot. The Motion is therefore denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 1:08-cv-03335-NJV Document 99 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER DENYING SCOTTSDALE'S MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION 

CASE NO. 08-CV-3335 NJV 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DATED: February 11, 2010 

By: 

NANDOR J. VADAS 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:08-cv-03335-NJV Document 99 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2