Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03345/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-03345-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ILIFE TECHNOLOGIES INC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALIPHCOM,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-03345-WHO 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. Nos. 81, 88, 91

In my February 5, 2015 order, I denied the parties’ motions for leave to seal documents 

ILIFE023770-74 and ILIFE023775-79 because I found that they did not contain information that 

is properly designated as confidential. See Dkt. No. 96. The third document that was the subject 

of the motions for leave to file under seal, designated by the parties as “ILIFE029695,” is not filed 

with this Court. I ordered iLife to file an unredacted version of ILIFE029695, as well as a 

declaration identifying the basis for its confidentiality, if it still wished to seal that document. 

Instead, iLife re-filed a document that I have already ruled is not sealable. See Dkt. Nos. 

97-98. iLife failed to file ILIFE029695, the document that it was directed to file. Accordingly, I 

clarify that if iLife believes that document ILIFE029695, which allegedly contains an “August 1, 

2006 email to iLife Solutions, Inc. that Davis Munck paid a Carpmaels & Ransford invoice on 

July 30, 2006,” see Amended Answer ¶ 72 (Dkt. No. 81-4), is sealable, it must file an unredacted 

version with the Court by Thursday, February 12, 2015. Otherwise I will DENY iLife’s request 

for leave to file ILIFE029695 under seal due to iLife’s repeated failure to comply with the Local 

Case 3:14-cv-03345-WHO Document 99 Filed 02/11/15 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Rules and the orders of this Court. See Dkt. No. 96. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2015

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-03345-WHO Document 99 Filed 02/11/15 Page 2 of 2