Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01992/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01992-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 05:7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act

---

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 

TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

United States Attorney 

BENJAMIN E. HALL 

Assistant United States Attorney 

2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 

Fresno, CA 93721 

Telephone: (559) 497-4000 

Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 

Attorneys for Defendants 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

David Shayne Heine, California Veal Tech, Inc. 

a California corporation, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Tim Vilsack in His Official Capacity as United 

States Secretary of Agriculture, United States 

Department of Agriculture, United States 

Department of Agriculture Food Safety and 

Inspections Service, Yudhbir Sharma, DVM, 

USDA Employee Known Only as “Dr. Pannu,” 

USDA Employee Known only as “Ken,”USDA 

Employee Known only as “Dr. Redding,” 

USDA Employee Known Only as “Dr. 

Henley,” Dr. Amy Lieder, Penny Patrali and 

DOES 1-100 inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 1:12-CV-01992-AWI-SMS 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

CONTINUE SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE 

 The parties to this action hereby stipulate and request that the Scheduling Conference set for 

February 19, 2014, be continued for the reasons set forth herein. 

 This action proceeds on plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 36). The parties, after 

conferring, have determined that service of process was not properly effected on certain parties 

named in the action. In order to avoid motion practice before the Court on issues relating to service 

of process, plaintiffs have undertaken to correct service of process, and the parties have agreed to 

Case 1:12-cv-01992-AWI-SMS Document 39 Filed 02/13/14 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 2 

TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

request that the Scheduling Conference be deferred so that the issues and parties are properly joined 

before the case is scheduled. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court continue 

the Scheduling Conference to April 17, 2014, or another later date convenient to the Court. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: February 12, 2014 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 

United States Attorney 

 /s/ Benjamin E. Hall 

BENJAMIN E. HALL 

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

Attorney for Defendants 

Dated: February 12, 2014 THE ZUMWALT LAW FIRM, APC. 

[As Authorized February 12, 2014] 

/s/ Graham S. Lopez 

GRAHAM S. LOPEZ 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

ORDER 

 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is 

continued to April 23, 2014, at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder. Telephonic 

appearances are granted with the parties to initiate a one-line conference call to chambers at (559) 

499-5690. A joint scheduling report is due one full week prior to the hearing. 

Dated: 2/13/2014 /s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER ____ 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:12-cv-01992-AWI-SMS Document 39 Filed 02/13/14 Page 2 of 2