Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04018/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04018-21/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

Stipulation and Proposed Order To Continue Patent Local Rule Deadlines 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

DOCSSFO-12488929.1 

John P. Bovich (SBN 150688) 

William R. Overend (SBN 180209) 

REED SMITH LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3922 

Telephone: 415.543.8700 

Facsimile: 415.391.8269 

William H. Manning (pro hac vice) 

Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) 

Eric S. Jackson (pro hac vice) 

Jacob S. Zimmerman (pro hac vice) 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 

2800 LaSalle Plaza, 800 LaSalle Avenue 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 

Telephone: 612.349.8500 

Facsimile: 612.339.4181 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company

John J. Feldhaus (pro hac vice) 

Stephen M. Lobbin (SBN 181195) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

1530 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125 

Telephone: 650.856.3700 

Facsimile: 650.856.3710 

Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information 

Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Business 

Solutions, Inc. and Toshiba TEC America Retail Information Systems, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INTERGRAPH HARDWARE 

TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, 

a Nevada corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, a Japanese 

corporation, et al., 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO

CONTINUE PATENT LOCAL RULE

DEADLINES; DECLARATION OF JOHN P.

BOVICH IN SUPPORT THEREOF 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 110 Filed 08/29/07 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

Stipulation and Proposed Order To Continue Patent Local Rule Deadlines 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

DOCSSFO-12488929.1 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company 

(“Intergraph”) and Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., 

Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Business Solutions, Inc. and Toshiba TEC 

America Retail Information Systems, Inc. (collectively “Toshiba”), through their respective counsel of 

record, hereby stipulate as follows: 

1. Under the current schedule, the deadline under Patent Local Rule 3-6(a) for serving 

Intergraph’s Final Infringement Contentions is September 4, 2007; the deadline under Patent Local Rule 

3-6(b) for serving Toshiba’s Final Invalidity Contentions is September 24, 2007; and the deadline under 

Patent Local Rule 3-8 for Toshiba to produce documents and/or serve a privilege log relating to 

opinion(s) of counsel on which Toshiba will rely as part of a defense to a claim of willful infringement 

is September 24, 2007. 

2. The parties are currently in the midst of a discovery dispute. Intergraph contends that 

Toshiba’s failure to comply with discovery requests has prevented Intergraph from complying with the 

September 4, 2007 deadline for Final Infringement Contentions. As a result, Intergraph has requested a 

continuance of the above deadlines for 120 days. Toshiba disputes Intergraph’s contentions, but has 

agreed to a continuance as set forth herein. 

3. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to the following continuance: 

 (a) November 5, 2007: last day for Intergraph to serve Final Infringement 

Contentions under Patent Local Rule 3-6(a) for Toshiba products for which RTL and Intel confidential 

documents were produced in the prior litigation in the Eastern District of Texas. Intergraph will comply 

with this deadline, and will not seek a further extension of it, if Toshiba produces by September 26, 

2007 a product list that identifies the specific Intel microprocessors and chipsets (both Intel and nonIntel); 

 (b) December 3, 2007: last day for Intergraph to serve Final Infringement 

Contentions under Patent Local Rule 3-6(a) for all other Toshiba products. Intergraph will comply with 

this deadline if (i) Toshiba produces by September 26, 2007 a product list regarding these other products 

which identifies products by microprocessor and chipsets and if (ii) Intel produces by September 26, 

2007 the related documentation previously requested by Intergraph. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 110 Filed 08/29/07 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 

Stipulation and Proposed Order To Continue Patent Local Rule Deadlines 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

DOCSSFO-12488929.1 

 (c) December 23, 2007: last day for Toshiba to serve Final Invalidity Contentions 

under Patent Local Rule 3-6(b) and last day for Toshiba to comply with Patent Local Rule 3-8. 

4. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(1)-(3), this stipulated request is accompanied by the 

attached declaration setting forth (1) the reasons for the requested rescheduling; (2) all previous time 

modifications in the case; and (3) the effect of the requested rescheduling. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: August 28, 2007. ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 

/s/ Brad P. Engdahl 

William H. Manning (pro hac vice) 

Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 

2800 LaSalle Plaza, 800 LaSalle Avenue 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 

Telephone: 612.349.8500 

Facsimile: 612.339.4181 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Intergraph Hardware Technologies 

Company

Dated: August 28, 2007. FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

/s/ John J. Feldhaus 

John J. Feldhaus (pro hac vice) 

Stephen M. Lobbin (State Bar No. 181195) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

1530 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125 

Telephone: 650.856.3700 

Facsimile: 650.856.3710 

Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba 

America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America 

Medical Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Business 

Solutions, Inc. and Toshiba TEC America Retail 

Information Systems, Inc.

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 110 Filed 08/29/07 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 

Stipulation and Proposed Order To Continue Patent Local Rule Deadlines 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

DOCSSFO-12488929.1 

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____________________, 2007 ______________________________________________

Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

United States District Judge

August 28

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 110 Filed 08/29/07 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5 

Stipulation and Proposed Order To Continue Patent Local Rule Deadlines 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

DOCSSFO-12488929.1 

CERTIFICATION 

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained by the above 

named signatories. 

DATED: August 28, 2007. 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 

By: /s/ Brad P. Engdahl 

Brad P. Engdahl 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 110 Filed 08/29/07 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6 

Stipulation and Proposed Order To Continue Patent Local Rule Deadlines 

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-04018 MHP 

DOCSSFO-12488929.1 

I, John P. Bovich, declare: 

1. I am a partner with Reed Smith LLP, local counsel for Intergraph in the above-captioned 

action. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth below, and if called upon I could and would 

testify competently thereto. 

2. The reasons for the requested rescheduling are stated in Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the 

Stipulation herein. Although the parties are continuing their attempts at informal resolution, their 

ongoing discovery dispute requires a continuance of the Court’s current Patent Local Rule deadlines. 

3. No previous time modifications have been sought or entered in this case which have 

altered any date set by this Court’s December 4, 2006 Order following the Case Management 

Conference, or any other deadline already fixed by the Court, with the exception of (a) the April 25, 

2007 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Deadlines Re Patent Briefings One Day, and (b) the 

June 6, 2007 Stipulation and Order Rescheduling Tutorial and Claim Construction Hearing to June 20, 

2007. Other time modifications have been entered, for example, extending the time for Plaintiff to 

respond reply to the Defendants’ counterclaims, and extending the time for certain exchanges between 

the parties under this Court’s Patent Local Rules, as well as extending the mediation deadline. 

4. The requested extension would affect only the deadlines under Patent Local Rules 3-6 

and 3-8, but will not affect other case deadlines. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on this 28rd day of August, 2007 at San Francisco, California. 

/s/ John P. Bovich 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 110 Filed 08/29/07 Page 6 of 6