Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00893/USCOURTS-caed-2_04-cv-00893-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 160
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

-1- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 04-CV-893 WBS DAD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TODD M. NOONAN (CA SBN 172962) 

STEVENS & O’CONNELL LLP 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1400 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 329-9111 

Facsimile: (916) 329-9110 

DEBORAH S. BIRNBACH (admitted pro hac vice) 

Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP 

125 High Street 

Boston, MA 02110 

Telephone: (617) 248-7602 

Facsimile: (617) 790-0031 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALBERT D. BOLT, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MERRIMACK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,

Defendant. 

Case No. 04-CV-893 WBS DAD 

STIPULATION RE BRIEFING RELATED 

TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

WHEREAS, the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, which are 

presently set for hearing on June 13, 2005. 

WHEREAS, on May 16, 2005, concurrently with its opposition to plaintiff’s motion for 

summary judgment, defendant Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed a Motion to Strike the

Testimony Of Plaintiff’s Expert Witness, Jeffery Rogers, and a Motion to Strike Portions of 

Plaintiff’s Statement of Undisputed Facts, which were directed at evidence and pleadings 

submitted by Plaintiff Albert Bolt in support of his motion for summary judgment. 

Case 2:04-cv-00893-WBS-DAD Document 71 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 04-CV-893 WBS DAD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS the parties have met and conferred and reached an agreement on further 

briefing on these two motions to strike. 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 

Plaintiff Albert Bolt’s opposition/response to the motion to strike the testimony of 

plaintiff’s expert witness, Jeffery Rogers, and the motion to strike portions of plaintiff’s statement 

of undisputed facts will be filed on or before June 6, 2005, either as part of or in conjunction with 

Plaintiff’s reply brief in support of his motion for summary judgment. No earlier response or 

opposition need be filed by Plaintiff. Defendant’s reply brief in support of its motion for summary 

judgment will also be filed on or before June 6, 2005. Briefing will be complete on the parties’ 

cross-motions for summary judgment and the two motions to strike with the filing of the parties’ 

respective briefs on June 6, 2005. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: May 24, 2005 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

By:/S/WILLIAM R. WARNE (authorized 5/24/05)

WILLIAM R. WARNE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ALBERT BOLT 

DATED: May 24, 2005 STEVENS & O’CONNELL LLP 

By:__/S/ TODD M. NOONAN_______________ 

TODD M. NOONAN 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MERRIMACK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 27, 2005 

Case 2:04-cv-00893-WBS-DAD Document 71 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 2