Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01318/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-01318-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgment

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

ITEQ Corporation,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Isola USA Corporation,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 09-CV-1318-PHX-PGR

 ORDER

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff ITEQ’s Motion to File a Surreply (Doc. 27) in

response to Defendant Isola’s Reply brief. ITEQ maintains that Isola raised a new argument

in its Reply brief regarding the interpretation of the phrase “third party” as it is referenced

in Paragraph 5 of the parties’ Settlement Agreement. ITEQ contends that in Isola’s Reply

brief, Isola interprets “third party” to mean “third party arbitrator.” ITEQ maintains that this

interpretation deviates from what the parties previously agreed the understanding of the

phrase to mean, “third party laboratory.” Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING Plaintiff’s Motion to File a Surreply in

response to Defendant Isola’s argument in its Reply brief as it pertains to the term “third

party arbitrator.” (Doc. 27.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the Lodged Proposed

Surreply. (Doc. 28.)

DATED this 28th day of September, 2009.

Case 2:09-cv-01318-PGR Document 35 Filed 09/29/09 Page 1 of 1