Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08088/USCOURTS-azd-3_07-cv-08088-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 190
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

-1-

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

CitiCapital Commerical Corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Russell’s Iron Worx, et al.

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-07-8088-PCT-PGR

 

 ORDER

Having reviewed the plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (doc. #15), the

Court notes that the current record does not support the plaintiff’s statement

therein that “[t]he Summons and Complaint were duly served upon Defendant

Russell’s Iron Worx, Inc., an Arizona corporation on the 28th day of January,

2008.” While the plaintiff has submitted the United States Marshal Service’s

Process Receipt and Return (doc. #10), that return of service states only that the

“Replevin” process was “personally served” - it does not state the manner in

which the defendant corporation was personally served, nor does it specifically

state that the summons and complaint were served along with the replevin order. 

The plaintiff is advised that the Court cannot consider its Motion for Default

Judgment until the plaintiff establishes that the defendant corporation was

Case 3:07-cv-08088-PGR Document 16 Filed 04/15/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The plaintiff is also advised that its capitalization of the parties’ names

in the caption of any document filed with the Court violates LR 7.1(a)(3).

- 2 - -2-

properly served. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file an amended return of service, or

other appropriate evidence of proper service, as to defendant Russell’s Iron Worx

no later than May 12, 2008.

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that fictitious defendants John and Jane Does

1-10, ABC Partnerships 1-10, Black and White Corporations, and Blue and Green

Limited Liability Companies 1-10 are all dismissed from this action without

prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

DATED this 15th day of April, 2008.

Case 3:07-cv-08088-PGR Document 16 Filed 04/15/08 Page 2 of 2