Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-07722/USCOURTS-cand-3_19-cv-07722-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint (3:19-cv-07722-VC )

XAVIER BECERRA

Attorney General of California

DAMON G. MCCLAIN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

ROBERT W. HENKELS

Deputy Attorney General

State Bar No. 255410

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000

San Francisco, CA 94102-7004

Telephone: (415) 510-3575

Fax: (415) 703-5843

E-mail: Robert.Henkels@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

R. Davis

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

TRAVIS SCOTT KING by and through his

Guardian Ad Litem Breanna Raymundo,

and BREANNA RAYMUNDO,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RONALD DAVIS AND DOES 1-25,

inclusive,

Defendants.

3:19-cv-07722-VC

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO

ANSWER COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED]

ORDER

Judge: The Honorable Vince Chhabria

Action Filed: November 22, 2019

Defendant Ronald Davis (Defendant) and Plaintiff Travis Scott King (Plaintiff), by and

through their counsel of record, agree and stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed his complaint seeking damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Ronald

Davis, the former warden at San Quentin State Prison, on November 22, 2019. On March 4,

2020, this Court directed Plaintiff to amend his complaint based on information about potential

parties provided him by defense counsel, and ordered Defendants to respond to the amended

complaint by March 25, 2020.

Case 3:19-cv-07722-VC Document 25 Filed 03/30/20 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint (3:19-cv-07722-VC )

2. Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint on March 5, 2020, adding D. Dews, C.

Nee, and J. Tran as defendants. Plaintiff effectuate service of Defendants D. Dews and J. Tran on

March 11, 2020, but Defendant C. Nee is apparently no longer employed by the California

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), and has yet to be served.

3. CDCR is retaining outside counsel for Defendant Tran and intends to do the same for

Defendant Nee when he is served, and thus the California Attorney General’s Office—including

current defense counsel—will not be representing those two Defendants.

4. The Governor for the State of California has recently issued a state-wide shelter-inplace order to slow the rate of infection of the Covid-19 virus. And CDCR’s nonessential

employees, and all nonessential attorneys with the Attorney General’s office, including defense

counsel, have been instructed to work from home. It has taken the State’s employees some time

to adapt, and CDCR employees must currently focus their efforts on their response to the Covid19 pandemic. Accordingly, while CDCR’s employees are still making every effort to accomplish

business as usual, ordinary tasks unrelated to the CDCR’s response to the Covid-19 virus are

taking much longer than usual to complete.

5. Given these circumstances, CDCR is still in the process of retaining counsel for

Defendants Tran and Nee.

6. The parties in this matter have met and conferred regarding these circumstances, and

agree that good cause supports an order extending Defendants’ time to respond to Plaintiff’s First

Amended Complaint by fourteen days (14), to April 9, 2020. Counsel for Defendant Davis is

informed and believes that fourteen days should be sufficient for CDCR to accomplish this task.

///

///

///

Case 3:19-cv-07722-VC Document 25 Filed 03/30/20 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint (3:19-cv-07722-VC )

6. The parties have not previously requested an extension of time.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LAW OFFICES OF IZAAK D. SCHWAIGER

Dated: March 24, 2020 By: /s/ Izaak D. Schwaiger_______________

IZAAK D. SCHWAIGER

Attorney for Plaintiffs TRAVIS SCOTT KING

And BREANNA RAYMUNDO

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Dated: March 24, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

XAVIER BECERRA

Attorney General of California

DAMON G. MCCLAIN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

__/s/ Robert W. Henkels___________

ROBERT W. HENKELS

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendant R. Davis

ORDER OF THE COURT

The Court, having read the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, hereby

EXTENDS defendants’ time to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint by fourteen days,

to April 9, 2020.

PURSUAN TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

 ____________________________________

United States District Judge Vince Chhabria

SF2020200106

21862264.docx

Dated: March 30, 2020

Case 3:19-cv-07722-VC Document 25 Filed 03/30/20 Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Case Name: T. King et al. v. R. Davis No. 3:19-cv-07722-VC

I hereby certify that on March 24, 2020, I electronically filed the following documents with the

Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system:

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be

accomplished by the CM/ECF system.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true

and correct and that this declaration was executed on March 24, 2020, at San Francisco,

California.

R. Lagumen /s/ R. Lagumen

Declarant Signature

SF2020200106

21862260.docx

Case 3:19-cv-07722-VC Document 25 Filed 03/30/20 Page 4 of 4