Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03910/USCOURTS-cand-3_10-cv-03910-29/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 360
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERNARDO MENDIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN M. GARCIA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 10-cv-03910-MEJ 

DISCOVERY ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 129

Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint letter disputing whether Plaintiff may take 

discovery from Defendants John M. Garcia and Ching Chang. Dkt. No. 129. The Court has 

recently issued an Order on those Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint.

Dkt. No. 138. At the same time, Defendants have also appealed the Court’s Order regarding their 

Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint and Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to file a 

Third Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 137 (Receipt of Notice of Appeal). The Court consequently 

requests supplemental briefing from the parties about the proposed scope of discovery in light of 

the Court’s recent Order on the Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint and Defendants’

recent appeal. The parties shall meet and confer and submit a supplemental letter of no longer 

than four pages total addressing the impact of the Court’s Order and Defendants’ Appeal on 

Plaintiff’s discovery requests. It is not necessary that the parties meet and confer in person. The 

supplemental letter must be filed by May 18, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2016

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:10-cv-03910-MEJ Document 139 Filed 05/10/16 Page 1 of 1