Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05092/USCOURTS-caed-1_04-cv-05092-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TREVOR JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

D. HENSON, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

1:04-cv-05092-AWI-NEW (DLB) PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION TO

DISMISS (Docs. 62 and 81)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BASED ON

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EXHAUST

Plaintiff Trevor Johnson (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 17, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. 

To date, the parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

Case 1:04-cv-05092-AWI-LJO Document 84 Filed 03/20/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 17,

2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Defendants’ renewed motion to dismiss for failure to

exhaust, filed July 5, 2006, is GRANTED; and,

3. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), this action is

DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on plaintiff’s failure to

exhaust the administrative remedies prior to filing suit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 19, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-05092-AWI-LJO Document 84 Filed 03/20/07 Page 2 of 2