Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03444/USCOURTS-azd-2_05-cv-03444-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 555
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Adam Moen, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Arpaio, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 05-3444-PHX-JAT

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate

Judge (R&R) recommending that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with Local

Rule 3.4 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

Plaintiff did not file objections to the R&R (Defendant has not been served).

Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149

(1985) (finding that district courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any

issue that is not the subject of an objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district

judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection

is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263

F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Therefore,

Case 2:05-cv-03444-JAT Document 10 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #7)

is ACCEPTED; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 3.4 and Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(b); the Clerk

of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. 

DATED this 10th day of May, 2006.

Case 2:05-cv-03444-JAT Document 10 Filed 05/11/06 Page 2 of 2