Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-md-01930/USCOURTS-cand-3_08-md-01930-41/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 480
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 42:405 Fair Housing Act

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C-08-1930 NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPOINT SPECIAL MASTER Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re: WELLS FARGO MORTGAGE

LENDING PRACTICES LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

ALL ACTIONS

________________________________/

M:08-CV-01930 MMC 

NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPOINT

SPECIAL MASTER 

FOR DISCOVERY PURPOSES

The Court, having reviewed the record of the discovery disputes in the above-titled

action, and having conferred with Magistrate Judge James Larson, hereby finds, pursuant

to Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the appointment of a Special

Master for discovery purposes is justified and necessary in light of (1) the complexity and

number of discovery disputes raised by the parties, and (2) the numerous requests for

court intervention sought by the parties with respect to their discovery disputes. Further,

the parties have agreed to such appointment. (See Minutes, filed February 17, 2010.)

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court

ORDERS as follows:

1. Each party shall submit to Magistrate Judge Larson, no later than March 4,

2010, a list of three candidates for appointment as Special Master, who shall have the

following duties:

Case 3:08-md-01930-MMC Document 230 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C-08-1930 NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPOINT SPECIAL MASTER Page 2 of 3

a. to preside over and decide all pending and future discovery motions in this

matter;

b. to control the sequence, timing, scope, and methods of discovery; 

c. to preside over depositions, document productions, and similar

proceedings, should he/she determine such oversight appropriate;

d. to compel the production of evidence and examination of witnesses or

parties under oath;

e. to rule on all contested discovery matters, including issues of privilege,

work product, and trade secret;

f. to rule on all requests for discovery-related sanctions, as well as to impose

such sanctions sua sponte;

g. to interpret and issue rulings with respect to any protective order entered

in the case;

h. to order the parties to make arrangements for the recording and/or

transcription of any and all proceedings before the Special Master; and

i. to have all other powers specified in Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

2. The Special Master shall be paid his or her normal rate for time spent

performing the above-referenced duties. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, all such fees

and costs are to be shared by the parties equally, unless the parties have agreed to a

different allocation. (See Minutes, filed February 17, 2010.)

3. All reports and findings, as well as any objections and motions in response

thereto, shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court.

4. There currently are pending before the Court the following discovery matters,

which, by the instant order, are referred to the Special Master for resolution:

a. Joint Statement Of Discovery Dispute (Docket No. 174);

b. Plaintiffs’ Statement of Discovery Dispute (Docket No. 169);

Case 3:08-md-01930-MMC Document 230 Filed 02/18/10 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C-08-1930 NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPOINT SPECIAL MASTER Page 3 of 3

c. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents Relating To

Methodologies Used By Wells Fargo In Its Fair Lending Analyses (Docket Nos. 183, 189);

and

d. Joint Statement Of Discovery Dispute (Docket No. 208).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 18, 2010 __________________________________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-md-01930-MMC Document 230 Filed 02/18/10 Page 3 of 3