Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00795/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-00795-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

781904.2 1 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 

DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

DANIEL J. COYLE (Bar No. 119274) 

CASSANDRA M. FERRANNINI (Bar No. 204277) 

KAREN D. BETTENCOURT (Bar No. 232933) 

555 Capitol Mall, Tenth Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814-4686 

Telephone: (916) 444-1000 

Facsimile: (916) 444-2100 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THOMAS WATSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TRANSHUMANCE EMPLOYEE STOCK 

OWNERSHIP PLAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WILLIAM J. PRICE; MARY ELLEN 

BREEN, in her capacity as the personal 

representative of the estate and as the 

beneficiary of DENNIS J. BREEN, 

deceased; THOMAS WATSON, and 

DOES 1-20, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:06-cv-00795-GEB-KJM 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

WILLIAM J. PRICE, MARY ELLEN 

BREEN, AND THOMAS WATSON TO 

RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 

FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE EMPLOYEE 

RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT 

OF 1974 

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 6-144(a), Plaintiff Transhumance 

Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Defendants William J. Price; Mary Ellen Breen, in her 

capacity as the personal representative of the estate and as the beneficiary of Dennis J. Breen; and 

Thomas Watson (“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to 

extend the time for each of the Defendants to file a response to the Amended Complaint for 

Violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“Amended Complaint”) by 

ten (10) days. 

Therefore, it is agreed that the Defendants shall have up to and including June 16, 2006 to 

respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00795-GEB -KJM Document 16 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

781904.2 2 

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

DATED: June ___, 2006 THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP 

By: 

CHARLES M. DYKE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TRANSHUMANCE EMPLOYEE STOCK 

OWNERSHIP PLAN 

DATED: June ___, 2006 SEGAL & KIRBY 

By: 

JAMES R. KIRBY, II 

Attorneys for Defendant 

WILLIAM J. PRICE 

DATED: June ___, 2006 PILLSBURY, WINTHROP, SHAW, PITTMAN LLP 

By: 

MICHAEL J. DAPONDE 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MARY ELLEN BREEN, in her capacity as the 

personal representative of the estate and as the 

beneficiary of DENNIS J. BREEN 

DATED: June ___, 2006 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

By: 

CASSANDRA M. FERRANNINI 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THOMAS WATSON 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

DATED: June 2, 2006 

 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. 

 United States District Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:06-cv-00795-GEB -KJM Document 16 Filed 06/02/06 Page 2 of 2