Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04072/USCOURTS-cand-5_04-cv-04072-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

 

Second Stip. to Extend Schedule For Micrus’ Motion To Compel 

Complete Responses To Micrus’ Interrogatories 2-5 And 

[Proposed] Order

[SEE SIGNATURE PAGE FOR ATTORNEY 

NAMES] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. and TARGET 

THERAPEUTICS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICRUS CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C 04 04072 (JW) 

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

SCHEDULE FOR MICRUS’ MOTION 

TO COMPEL COMPLETE 

RESPONSES TO MICRUS’ 

INTERROGATORIES 2-5 AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, 7-11 and 7-12 and at plaintiff’s request, plaintiffs 

Boston Scientific Corp. and Target Therapeutics, Inc. (collectively “Boston Scientific”) and 

defendant Micrus Corporation (“Micrus”) hereby request an order modifying the schedule for 

filing Boston Scientific’s opposition, Micrus’ reply, and hearing arguments for Micrus’ Motion 

To Compel Complete Responses To Micrus’ Interrogatories 2-5. The parties are in the process of 

meeting and conferring in an attempt to narrow the discovery issues in dispute. A one-week 

extension will allow the parties additional time to resolve these disputed issues. If the parties 

succeed in resolving these disputed issues, Micrus’s Motion to Compel Complete Responses To 

Micrus’ Interrogatories 2-5 would become moot. 

*E-FILED 11/21/06*

Case 5:04-cv-04072-JW Document 81 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Second Stip. to Extend Schedule For Micrus’ Motion To Compel 

Complete Responses To Micrus’ Interrogatories 2-5 And 

[Proposed] Order 2 

Event Current Schedule Revised due date

Boston Scientific’s Opposition due Wed., 11/22/06 Wed., 11/29/06 

Micrus’ Reply due Fri., 12/01/06 Wed., 12/6/06 

Hearing Wed., 12/13/06 

Wed., 1/03/06 or as 

soon thereafter as the 

motion may be heard

Pursuant to General Order 45, § X(B), counsel for Boston Scientific attests under 

penalty of perjury that counsel for Micrus concurs in the filing of this stipulation. 

Dated: November 21, 2006 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. and MICRUS CORPORATION 

TARGET THERAPEUTICS, INC. 

By: /s/ Amanda M. Kessel By: /s/ Eric Xanthopoulos 

FOLGER LEVIN & KAHN LLP WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Michael F. Kelleher (Bar No. 165493) Matthew D. Powers (Bar No. 104795) 

Julie L. Fieber (Bar No. 202857) Douglas E. Lumish (Bar No. 183863) 

Embarcadero Center West Eric Xanthopoulos (Bar No. 253973) 

275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor Rip J. Finst (Bar No. 234478) 

San Francisco, CA 94111 Silicon Valley Office 

Telephone: 415-986-2800 201 Redwood Shores Parkway 

Fax: 415-986-2827 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

 Telephone: 650-802-3000 

 Fax: 650-802-3100 

J. Anthony Downs (Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendant 

Roland H. Schwillinski (Pro Hac Vice) 

Amanda M. Kessel (Pro Hac Vice) 

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 

Exchange Place 

Boston, MA 02109-2881 

Telephone: 617-570-1000 

Fax: 617-570-1231 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 5:04-cv-04072-JW Document 81 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Second Stip. to Extend Schedule For Micrus’ Motion To Compel 

Complete Responses To Micrus’ Interrogatories 2-5 And 

[Proposed] Order 3 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November __, 2006 ____________________________________ 

 Hon. Richard Seeborg 

 United States District Court 

 Magistrate Judge 

21

Case 5:04-cv-04072-JW Document 81 Filed 11/21/06 Page 3 of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Second Stip. to Extend Schedule For Micrus’ Motion To Compel 

Complete Responses To Micrus’ Interrogatories 2-5 And 

[Proposed] Order 4 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF AMANDA M. KESSEL

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, I, Amanda M. Kessel, declare as follows 

1. I am an associate in the law firm of Goodwin Procter LLP, a member in 

good standing of the Bar of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and counsel for plaintiffs 

Boston Scientific Corporation and Target Therapeutics, Inc. (collectively “Boston Scientific” or 

“Plaintiffs”) in the above-captioned case. I have been admitted to practice before the Court pro 

hac vice for purposes of this action. 

2. The factual representations made in the above Stipulation are true. The 

parties have met and conferred and agree that the schedule should be extended as requested 

above. 

3. There has been one prior modification to the schedule for Micrus’ Motion 

To Compel Complete Responses To Micrus’ Interrogatories 2-5, entered by Judge Seeborg on 

November 14, 2006. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 

that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed November 21, 2006 at Boston, Massachusetts. 

 /s/ Amanda M. Kessel 

 Amanda M. Kessel 

Case 5:04-cv-04072-JW Document 81 Filed 11/21/06 Page 4 of 4