Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01500/USCOURTS-caed-1_10-cv-01500-22/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN ELLIS PORTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHERYLEE WEGMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:10-cv-01500-LJO-BAM (PC)

SCHEDULING ORDER

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO 

NOTIFY WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION 

WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE 

TO SEND LOCAL RULE 281 TO 

PLAINTIFF

Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing:

June 20, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4 

(LJO)

Jury Trial: August 29, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. in 

Courtroom 4 (LJO)

Plaintiff Brian Ellis Porter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 1, 2015, the Court adopted the 

findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge granting Defendants’ motion for summary 

judgment (ECF No. 135), and entered judgment closing the case. (ECF No. 136.) Plaintiff 

appealed. (ECF No. 138.)

On November 23, 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part, 

Case 1:10-cv-01500-BAM Document 144 Filed 12/21/16 Page 1 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

reversed in part, and remanded the matter for further proceedings. (ECF No. 141.) On December 

15, 2016, the Ninth Circuit issued its mandate. (ECF No. 143.)

Following remand, this action now proceeds to trial on Plaintiff’s claims against 

Defendant Wegman for violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment of the 

United States Constitution. In particular, this action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claim that Defendant 

Wegman violated his right to free exercise of his religion by switching him from a kosher diet to 

a vegetarian diet and denying his requested dietary accommodations during multi-day Passover 

observances. Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b), the Court now sets a further 

schedule for this litigation.

The parties are required to file pretrial statements in accordance with the schedule set 

forth herein. In addition to the matters already required to be addressed in the pretrial statement 

under Local Rule 281, the parties will be required to submit requests to obtain the attendance of 

incarcerated witnesses. The procedures, requirements and deadlines for such a request are 

outlined in detail below. The parties are advised that failure to comply with the procedures set 

forth below may result in the preclusion of any and all witnesses.

At the trial of this case, Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each of 

the alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of 

trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) the testimony of witnesses. Plaintiff is responsible for

producing all of the evidence to prove his case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits or 

witness testimony. If Plaintiff wants to call witnesses to testify, he must follow certain procedures 

to ensure that the witnesses will be at the trial and available to testify.

1. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to Testify 

Voluntarily

An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give testimony cannot 

come to court unless the Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the witness to be 

transported to court. The Court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied that the 

prospective witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts.

A party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have agreed 

Case 1:10-cv-01500-BAM Document 144 Filed 12/21/16 Page 2 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file concurrent with the pretrial statement a written 

motion for a court order requiring that such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The 

motion must: (1) state the name, address, and prison identification number of each such witness; 

and (2) be accompanied by declarations showing that each witness is willing to testify and that 

each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. The motion should be entitled “Motion for 

Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses.”

The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways: (1) the party 

himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has 

informed the party that he or she is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed, in 

which declaration the party must state when and where the prospective witness informed the party 

of this willingness; or (2) the party can serve and file a declaration, signed under penalty of 

perjury by the prospective witness, in which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify 

without being subpoenaed.

The prospective witness’s actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two 

ways: (1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness was an 

eyewitness or an ear-witness to the relevant facts (e.g., if an incident occurred in Plaintiff’s cell 

and, at the time, Plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, Plaintiff may 

swear to the cellmate’s ability to testify), the party himself can swear by declaration under penalty 

of perjury that the prospective witness has actual knowledge; or (2) the party can serve and file a 

declaration signed under penalty of perjury by the prospective witness in which the witness 

describes the relevant facts to which the prospective witness was an eye or ear witness. Whether 

the declaration is made by the party or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the 

incident, when and where it occurred, who was present, and how the prospective witness 

happened to be in a position to see or to hear what occurred at the time it occurred.

The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses, 

specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the Court will 

issue the order necessary to cause the witness’s custodian to bring the witness to court. 

Motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses at trial, if any, must be filed on or 

Case 1:10-cv-01500-BAM Document 144 Filed 12/21/16 Page 3 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

before May 23, 2017. Objections, if any, must be filed on or before June 6, 2017.

2. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to 

Testify Voluntarily

If a party seeks to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify 

voluntarily, the party should submit with his pretrial statement a motion for the attendance of 

such witnesses. Such motion should be in the form described above. In addition, the party must 

indicate in the motion that the incarcerated witnesses are not willing to testify voluntarily.

3. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to 

Testify Voluntarily

It is the responsibility of the party who has secured an unincarcerated witness’s voluntary 

attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial. No action need be sought or obtained 

from the Court.

4. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to 

Testify Voluntarily

If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify voluntarily, the 

witness must be served with a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In addition, the party seeking the 

witness’s presence must tender an appropriate sum of money for the witness. Id. In the case of an 

unincarcerated witness, the appropriate sum of money is the daily witness fee of $40.00 plus the 

witness’s travel expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 1821. 

If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of one or more unincarcerated witnesses who 

refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must first notify the Court in writing of the name and 

location of each unincarcerated witness. The Court will calculate the travel expense for each 

unincarcerated witness and notify Plaintiff of the amount(s). Plaintiff must then, for each witness, 

submit a money order made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witness’s travel 

expenses plus the daily witness fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served upon the 

unincarcerated witness by the United States Marshal unless the money order is tendered to the 

Court. Because no statute authorizes the use of public funds for these expenses in civil cases, the 

tendering of witness fees and travel expenses is required even if the party was granted leave to 

Case 1:10-cv-01500-BAM Document 144 Filed 12/21/16 Page 4 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

proceed in forma pauperis.

If Plaintiff wishes to have the Marshal serve any unincarcerated witnesses who refuse to 

testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must submit the money orders to the Court no later than June 20, 

2017. To ensure timely submission of the money orders, Plaintiff must notify the Court of the 

names and locations of his witnesses, in compliance with step one, on or before May 9, 2017.

The parties are advised that failure to file pretrial statements as required by this order may 

result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, which may include dismissal of the action or 

entry of default.

Finally, the Court shall direct the Clerk’s Office to provide the parties with 

consent/decline forms. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, the parties 

shall inform the Court whether they consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by filling 

out the forms and returning them to the Court. The following is important information about 

scheduling and trailing cases:

District Court Judges of the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California now have 

the heaviest caseload in the nation. As a result, each District Judge schedules multiple trials to 

begin on each available trial date. Civil cases will trail and begin as soon as a courtroom is 

cleared. The law requires that the Court give any criminal trial priority over civil trials or any 

other matter. A civil trial set to begin while a criminal trial is proceeding will trail the completion 

of the criminal trial.

The Court cannot give advance notice of which cases will trail or for how long because 

the Court does not know which cases actually will go to trial or precisely how long each will last. 

Once your trial date arrives, counsel, parties and witnesses must remain on 24-hour-stand-by until 

a court opens. Since continuance to a date certain will simply postpone, but not solve, the 

problem, continuances of any civil trial under these circumstances will no longer be entertained, 

absent a specific and stated finding of good cause. The Court will use its best efforts to mitigate 

the effect of the foregoing and to resolve all cases in a timely manner.

One alternative is for the parties to consent to a United States Magistrate Judge 

conducting all proceedings, including trial and entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 28 

Case 1:10-cv-01500-BAM Document 144 Filed 12/21/16 Page 5 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

U.S.C. 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. The Eastern District 

Magistrate Judges, all experienced former trial lawyers, use the same jury pool and same court 

facilities as United States District Court Judges. Since Magistrate Judges do not conduct felony 

trials, they have greater flexibility and schedule firm trial dates. Judgment entered by a United 

States Magistrate Judge is appealable directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth 

Circuit. (While there are scheduling benefits to consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, 

substantive rulings and decisions will not be affected by whether a party chooses to consent or 

not.)

As another response to its large caseload, the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of 

California is assigning cases, whenever possible, to Article III District Court Judges from around 

the nation as Visiting Judges. Under the Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be 

random, and the parties will receive no advance notice before their case is reassigned to an Article 

III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern District of California.

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:

1. This matter is set for telephonic trial confirmation hearing before the Honorable 

Lawrence J. O’Neill on June 20, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4;

2. This matter is set for jury trial before the Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill on August 

29, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4;

3. Counsel for Defendant is required to arrange for the participation of Plaintiff in the 

telephonic trial confirmation hearing and to initiate the telephonic hearing at (559) 

499-5680;

4. Plaintiff shall serve and file a pretrial statement as described in this order on or before 

May 23, 2017;

5. Defendant shall serve and file a pretrial statement as described in this order on or 

before June 6, 2017;

6. In addition to electronically filing her pretrial statement, Defendant shall e-mail the 

pretrial statement to: ljoorders@caed.uscourts.gov;

7. If Plaintiff intends to call incarcerated witnesses at time of trial, Plaintiff shall serve 

Case 1:10-cv-01500-BAM Document 144 Filed 12/21/16 Page 6 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7

and file a motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses as described in this order on 

or before May 23, 2017;

8. The opposition to the motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, shall 

be filed on or before June 6, 2017;

9. If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of unincarcerated witnesses who refuse to 

testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must notify the Court of their names and locations on or 

before May 9, 2017, and Plaintiff must submit the money orders, as described in 

subsection 4 of this order, to the Court on or before June 20, 2017;

10. The Clerk’s Office shall send the parties consent/decline forms;

11. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, the parties shall notify 

the Court whether they consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by filling 

out the enclosed forms and returning them to the Court; and

12. The Clerk’s Office shall send Plaintiff a copy of Local Rule 281.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 20, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-01500-BAM Document 144 Filed 12/21/16 Page 7 of 7