Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01561/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-01561-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 446
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE DATES 

UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Ruthee Goldkorn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUTHEE GOLDKORN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CIM OAKLAND CITY CENTER, LLC, dba 

OAKLAND MARRIOTT CITY CENTER, et 

al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 4:15-cv-01561-JSW

STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 

TO CONTINUE DATES UNDER 

GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Ruthee Goldkorn (“Plaintiff”), has brought this action against 

Defendants, CIM/Oakland City Center, LLC, dba Oakland Marriott City Center (“CIM,” and 

together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), and DiNapoli Capital Partners LLC (“DiNapoli”) 

alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and in part seeking to 

have barriers to her access removed from the Oakland Marriott City Center hotel located at 

1001 Broadway in Oakland, California (“the Facility”), and this matter therefore proceeds 

under the procedural requirements of General Order 56;

WHEREAS, Defendant DiNapoli was dismissed without prejudice on July 15, 2015 

(Dkt. 12);

//

Case 4:15-cv-01561-JSW Document 14 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 3 Case4:15-cv-01561-JSW Document13 Filed07/15/15 Page1 of 3
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE DATES 

UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, on April 6, 2015, the Court issued its Scheduling Order for Cases 

Asserting Denial of Right of Access under the Americans with Disabilities Act (Dkt. 4) (“the 

Scheduling Order”);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order and General Order 56, the last date by 

which Plaintiff was to complete service of the complaint on defendants or file a motion for 

administrative relief from the service deadline was June 5, 2015, and the last date by which the 

parties are to conduct a joint inspection of the subject property is July 20, 2015;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has recently learned the identity of the true current legal 

owner/operator of the Facility, to whom the Facility was transferred during the pendency of 

this action, and must now amend her complaint to name this entity as it is solely able to 

remove the barriers to access which Plaintiff alleges exist at the Facility;

WHEREAS, this amendment would not be prejudicial to CIM, and is not the product 

of undue delay, proposed in bad faith, or futile;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff will thereafter need additional time to serve the new defendant 

and to obtain its participation in the joint site inspection required pursuant to General Order 56;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, 

through their respective attorneys of record, that Plaintiff may file a Second Amended 

Complaint (“SAC”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff will file her SAC within five (5) 

calendar days of the Court’s Order permitting such filing, and that CIM’s response thereto 

shall be filed within thirty (30) days after the SAC is filed.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff shall complete service of the summons 

and SAC on the newly named defendant and shall file a proof of service of summons within 

thirty (30) days of the filing of the SAC.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the joint site inspection required pursuant to 

General Order 56 ¶ 3 shall be completed by October 9, 2015, and that all other dates and 

deadlines under General Order 56 which are triggered by the joint site inspection shall be 

calculated accordingly. 

Case 4:15-cv-01561-JSW Document 14 Filed 07/16/15 Page 2 of 3 Case4:15-cv-01561-JSW Document13 Filed07/15/15 Page2 of 3
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE DATES 

UNDER GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 15, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Ruthee Goldkorn

Dated: July 15, 2015 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

/s/ Kristina M. Launey

Kristina M. Launey

Attorneys for Defendant, 

CIM/Oakland City Center, LLC 

dba Oakland Marriott City Center

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her Second Amended Complaint, 

a copy of which was filed with the Parties’ stipulation, within five (5) calendar days of the date 

this Order is filed. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant CIM/Oakland City Center, LLC, dba 

Oakland Marriott City Center’s response thereto shall be filed within thirty (30) days after the 

Second Amended Complaint is filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall complete service of the summons 

and Second Amended Complaint on the newly named defendant and shall file a proof of 

service of summons within thirty (30) days of the filing of the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the joint site inspection required pursuant to 

General Order 56 ¶ 3 shall be completed by October 9, 2015, and that all other dates and 

deadlines under General Order 56 which are triggered by the joint site inspection shall be 

calculated accordingly. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

 United States District Judge

Case4:15-cv-01561-JSW Document13 Filed07/15/15 Page3 of 3

July 16, 2015

Case 4:15-cv-01561-JSW Document 14 Filed 07/16/15 Page 3 of 3