Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01701/USCOURTS-caed-2_06-cv-01701-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER T. HARRELL, No. CIV S-06-1701-LKK-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

BARBARA MURRAY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action for damages, invoking this

court’s diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Pending before the court is

plaintiff’s document entitled “Notice of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss,” (Doc. 9), filed on

December 1, 2006. Plaintiff states that he has settled the claims giving rise to this action and

requests voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice. Good cause appearing therefore, the

court will recommend that plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal be granted and that this case

be dismissed with prejudice.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:06-cv-01701-LKK -CMK Document 10 Filed 12/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal be granted; 

2. This action be dismissed; and

3. The Clerk of the Court be directed to enter judgment and close this file.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 20 days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive

the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 6, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-01701-LKK -CMK Document 10 Filed 12/07/06 Page 2 of 2