Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02567/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-02567-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Billy Taylor, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

AFS Technologies, Inc.; Kurien and

Prasanna Jacob; Walter and Jane Doe

Barandarian; Kimberly and John Doe

Curtis; Rebecca and Jason Barr; Andi

and John Doe Romano; and the

Argentum Group, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-2567-PHX-DGC

ORDER

Plaintiff Billy Taylor brought this employment law action by filing a pro se complaint

against Defendants on December 8, 2009. Dkt. #1. The amended complaint asserts race

discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Dkt. #94.

Defendant AFS Technologies, Inc. has filed tortious interference counterclaims. Dkt. #28.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to exceed page limit. Dkt. #137. He asserts that

he is ready to file a summary judgment motion and needs eight pages more than the allotted

seventeen in order to fully articulate the facts in support of summary judgment. Plaintiff

does not describe the nature of his summary judgment motion. Nor does he explain why 25

pages are needed to demonstrate that certain undisputed material facts entitle him to

judgment as a matter of law.

Case 2:09-cv-02567-DGC Document 141 Filed 07/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Moreover, the Court previously denied as premature a summary judgment motion

filed by Plaintiff in January 2010. Dkt. ##8, 24. The Court stated that Plaintiff may seek

summary judgment after discovery has been completed. Dkt. #24 at 2. The discovery

deadline is October 29, 2010. Dkt. #62 at 2. Plaintiff may file a motion for summary

judgment after that date and before the dispositive motion deadline of November 19, 2010

(Dkt. #62 at 4).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to exceed page limit (Dkt. #137) is denied.

2. Plaintiff may file a summary judgment motion between October 29 and

November 19, 2010.

3. Because the motion will address a single counterclaim, the Court will not

extend the page limit.

DATED this 14th day of July, 2010.

Case 2:09-cv-02567-DGC Document 141 Filed 07/15/10 Page 2 of 2