Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02718/USCOURTS-cand-3_07-cv-02718-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESTHER HWANG,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

et al.,

Defendants

 /

No. C-07-2718 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S

STANDING ORDERS

On August 22, 2008, plaintiff electronically filed her opposition to defendants’ motion

for summary judgment, as well as the Declaration of Benjamin Nisenbaum. Plaintiff has

violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing to deliver to

the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the papers

are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically

. . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number,

and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing

Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

documents. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if she fails in the future to comply with the

Case 3:07-cv-02718-MMC Document 48 Filed 08/29/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed document,

the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any

electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 29, 2008 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:07-cv-02718-MMC Document 48 Filed 08/29/08 Page 2 of 2