Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-01788/USCOURTS-cand-4_03-cv-01788-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

Civil Action No. C03-1788 SBA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

DIONEX CORPORATION, 

a Delaware Corporation, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

 

ALLTECH ASSOCIATES, INC., 

an Illinois Corporation, 

 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. C03-1788 SBA 

 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong

 WHEREAS Dionex Corporation ("Dionex") and Alltech, Inc., ("Alltech") have 

entered into a confidential settlement, which provides a basis for conclusion of these 

actions; 

 THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, through their 

counsel of record, that: 

1. All claims, defenses, and counterclaims in Case No. C03-1788 SBA are 

hereby dismissed with prejudice, except Alltech’s counterclaims of invalidity which are 

dismissed without prejudice. However, it is expressly understood that neither Party is 

admitting the validity or invalidity of any patent, or its direct, contributory, or inducement 

of infringement or non-infringement of any patent, or any issue relating to the abovecaptioned action. It is further expressly understood that neither Party is waiving or has 

waived any claim, affirmative defense or contention that any patents are valid, invalid, 

enforceable or unenforceable, including any claim, affirmative defense or contention 

based upon the factual allegations made in the above captioned-action. Each Party 

expressly reserves such issues, contentions, claims and/or defenses. 

Case 4:03-cv-01788-SBA Document 59 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

Civil Action No. C03-1788 SBA 

2. The parties do not accept, admit, or waive any issue, matter, or position 

raised in or relating to these above-captioned actions. 

3. Each Party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit. 

4. This court shall retains jurisdiction subject to the condition that any 

motions filed relating to settlement can be referred to a magistrate for disposition. 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b), the parties consent that all proceedings concerning 

the enforcement of the parties' settlement shall be conducted before a Magistrate Judge 

designated by the Court. 

Dated: October 7, 2005 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 

By: _________/s/___________

David J. Brezner 

Attorneys for Dionex 

Dated: October 7, 2005 BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE 

By:___________/s/__________

Ralph J. Gabric 

Attorneys for Alltech 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of October, 2005. 

________________________

Saundra B. Armstrong 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:03-cv-01788-SBA Document 59 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2