Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02488/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02488-7/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

184947.1 -1- 

WILKE,FLEURY,HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAC RAMENTO STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER THEREON

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 

ROBERT F. TYLER (SBN 063055) 

400 Capitol Mall, Twenty-Second Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 441-2430 

Facsimile: (916) 442-6664 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JUDITH JOHNSON, R.N., and CHERYL PAIZIS, D.O. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JULIEN PROVENCHER, SR., 

Individually; JEAN THURSTON, 

Individually, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; 

Sacramento County Sheriff's Department 

Sheriff LOU BLANAS; Sacramento 

County Sheriff's Department Captain JIM 

COOPER; JUDITH JOHNSON; 

CHERYL PAIZIS; and Does I through 

XXX, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. CIV.S – 02-2488 FCD JFM 

(Consolidated Cases) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER THEREON 

Complaint Filed: February 7, 2003 

Trial Date: June 6, 2006 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BETWEEN THE PLAINTIFFS 

HEREIN AND DEFENDANTS JUDITH JOHNSON, R.N. AND CHERYL PAIZIS, D.O. 

AS FOLLOWS:

1. That decedent Julien Provencher was never seen by Defendant Judith Johnson, 

R.N., nor by Defendant Cheryl Paizis, D.O., nor by any of the employees that they supervised 

during the incarceration in question, and that there is thus no basis for liability to be asserted by 

Plaintiffs against either Defendant Johnson or Paizis herein; 

2. That the Provencher Plaintiffs have agreed to dismiss their claims as against 

Defendants Johnson and Paizis, with prejudice; and 

Case 2:02-cv-02488-FCD-JFM Document 128 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

184947.1 -2- 

WILKE,FLEURY,HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAC RAMENTO STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER THEREON

3. In return therefore, Defendants Johnson and Paizis have agreed to waive any 

claims that they may otherwise have for their costs of suit herein. 

DATED: October 24, 2005 WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, 

GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 

By: //ROBERT F. TYLER// 

ROBERT F. TYLER 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

JUDITH JOHNSON, R.N., and CHERYL 

PAIZIS, D.O. 

DATED: October 17, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ 

By: //STEWART KATZ// 

STEWART KATZ 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

JULIEN PROVENCHER, SR., Individually; 

JEAN THURSTON, Individually 

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is hereby 

ordered that the Provencher Plaintiffs’ suit, as against Defendants Cheryl Paizis, D.O. and Judith 

Johnson, R.N. is hereby dismissed. 

Dated: October 25, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

 Frank C. Damrell, Jr. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:02-cv-02488-FCD-JFM Document 128 Filed 10/26/05 Page 2 of 2