Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04187/USCOURTS-cand-4_07-cv-04187-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

RE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE CASE NO. 4:07-CV-04187 SBA

DAVID L. HAYES (CSB No. 122894)

 (dhayes@fenwick.com) 

MICHAEL J. SACKSTEDER (CSB No. 191605) 

 (msacksteder@fenwick.com) 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street 

12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 

SAINA S. SHAMILOV (CSB No. 216636) 

 (sshamilov@fenwick.com) 

TODD R. GREGORIAN (CSB NO. 236096) 

 (tgregorian@fenwick.com) 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Silicon Valley Center, 801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Telephone: (650) 988-8500 

Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, a 

German corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

i2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 4:07-cv-04187 SBA 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING DEADLINE FOR FILING 

REVISED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT 

STATEMENT 

WHEREAS, the Court’s April 8, 2008 Order directs the parties to file a Joint Case 

Management Statement proposing a new schedule by June 9, 2008; and 

WHEREAS the parties have engaged in the process of negotiating a new proposed 

schedule, but have not yet completed that process, 

The deadline to file a Joint Case Management Statement proposing a new schedule is 

Case 4:07-cv-04187-SBA Document 86 Filed 06/10/08 Page 1 of 2
FENWICK 

&

WEST LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MOUNTAIN VIEW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

RE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE 2 CASE NO. 4:07-CV-04187 SBA

extended by two weeks, until June 23, 2008. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

I, Michael Sacksteder, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from any signatories indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed 

document. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 6 day of June, 2008, at San Francisco, California. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 9, 2008 

 

 

The Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong 

United States District Judge 

Northern District of California

Dated: June 6, 2008 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By:/s/ Michael Sacksteder 

Michael Sacksteder 

Attorneys for Plaintiff SAP Akteingesellschaft

Dated: June 6, 2008 

 

By:/s/ Andrew Spangler 

Andrew Spangler 

Attorneys for Defendant i2 Technologies, Inc. 

Dated: June 6, 2008 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

By:/s/ Michael Sacksteder 

Michael Sacksteder 

Attorneys for Plaintiff SAP Akteingesellschaft

Case 4:07-cv-04187-SBA Document 86 Filed 06/10/08 Page 2 of 2