Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-00155/USCOURTS-caed-1_21-cv-00155-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN W. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:21-cv-00155-ADA-EPG (PC)

ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND 

REQUIRING FURTHER STATUS REPORT

(ECF Nos. 68, 70)

Plaintiff John Williams is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action. 

This action is proceeding based on allegations that Defendant Oaks physically and sexually 

assaulted Plaintiff on August 5, 2019, that Defendant Pascoe failed to protect Plaintiff from 

Defendant Oaks, and that Defendants Oaks, Pascoe, Riddle, Beer, Garcia, and Cubos failed to 

provide or summon medical care after the assault. (ECF Nos. 1, 10, 13, 25). 

On April 5, 2022, the presiding District Judge granted Defendants’ motion to stay this 

action pending the resolution of the related state criminal proceedings. (ECF No. 53). The Court 

also directed Defendants “to file a status report within fourteen days after the criminal case is 

resolved, or one year after the date of the stay, whichever is earlier.” (Id. at 2). Since then, 

Defendants have filed three status reports noting that the criminal case has not been resolved. 

(ECF Nos. 62, 64, 66). Now before the Court is Defendants’ fourth status report, stating that 

Plaintiff has been granted mental health diversion and requesting that the Court continue the stay. 

(ECF No. 68). 

Case 1:21-cv-00155-KES-EPG Document 71 Filed 10/16/23 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Although little information is provided concerning the circumstances of Plaintiff’s mental 

health, Defendants state that Plaintiff will be on mental health diversion for two years with 

periodic reviews. Mental health diversion is addressed under California Penal Code § 1001.36, 

which permits pretrial diversion to a defendant if, among other things, the Plaintiff has a 

diagnosed mental disorder that was a significant factor in the commission of the charged offense. 

Criminal proceedings may be diverted for no longer than two years (assuming the offense 

charged is a felony) during which time the defendant obtains treatment, and the proceedings may 

be reinstated, if among other things, the defendant commits another crime. However, if the 

defendant performs satisfactorily in diversion, his charges will be dismissed. 

Plaintiff has filed an opposition to the Court continuing the stay. (ECF No. 70). He states 

that he has been admitted into the mental health crisis bed for suicide prevention and he lacks 

access to his legal property. Nevertheless, he asks for the stay to be lifted in order to proceed with 

this civil case.

The District Judge imposed the stay in this case based on findings and recommendations 

concluding that the events at issue in the criminal case appeared to be the same as those at issue 

here and noting that the outcome of the criminal case could affect the disposition of this case.

(ECF Nos. 45, 53). Among other things, the Court noted that, if no stay were imposed, 

Defendants may be required to litigate a case subject to a Heck1bar defense, that staying the case 

would serve the interests of judicial economy given the overlapping facts, and there was not 

sufficient prejudice to Plaintiff from any resulting delay. 

Upon consideration, the Court declines to lift the stay at this time, finding that the relevant 

considerations still support a stay.

However, giving the evolving circumstances surrounding Plaintiff’s criminal case and 

mental health treatment, the Court will require a status report in six months regarding the status of 

the case and may reconsider lifting the stay at that time. 

\\\

\\\

\\\

1 Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994).

Case 1:21-cv-00155-KES-EPG Document 71 Filed 10/16/23 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The stay in this case continues.

2. By no later than April 16, 2024, Defendants shall file a status report concerning the 

status of Plaintiff’s criminal case and any other matters that might affect the stay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 16, 2023 /s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:21-cv-00155-KES-EPG Document 71 Filed 10/16/23 Page 3 of 3