Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-00210/USCOURTS-cand-5_15-cv-00210-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 290
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 15-cv-00210 NC 

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES YTURRALDE, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

AZTEC FORECLOSURE 

CORPORATION, a corporation; 

SABADELL UNITED BANK, N.A., a 

national association; LYDIAN 

MORTGAGE, a corporation; and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 15-cv-00210 NC

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW 

CAUSE REGARDING SUBJECT 

MATTER JURISDICTION 

Re: Dkt. No. 26 

This case was removed by Sabadell United Bank on the basis of federal question 

jurisdiction. See Dkt. No. 1 at 3-6. Because the assertion regarding federal question 

jurisdiction appeared to lack merit, the Court previously ordered Sabadell United Bank to 

show cause why this case should not be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 14. After the Court issued the order to show cause, the Federal 

Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Lydian Private Bank, N.A. (“FDIC - 

Receiver”), erroneously sued as Lydian Mortgage, filed a notice that FDIC - Receiver 

consents to the removal of the action. Dkt. Nos. 11, 17. The Court discharged the order to 

show cause, finding that it has jurisdiction over this action under 12 U.S.C. 

§ 1819(b)(2)(A) if FDIC - Receiver is a party to this action. However, the Court noted that 

FDIC - Receiver has not formally moved to be substituted as a party and gave FDIC - 

Case 5:15-cv-00210-LHK Document 28 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Case No

SECOND

Receive

- Receiv

By

party or 

of subje

IT

D

. 15-cv-002

D ORDER T

r a deadline

ver has not m

y April 3, 2

show cause

ct matter ju

T IS SO OR

ate: March 

10 NC 

TO SHOW C

e to file suc

moved to b

2015, FDIC 

e in writing

urisdiction. 

RDERED. 

27, 2015 

 

CAUSE

ch a motion 

e substitute

- Receiver 

g why the ca

 

 2 

by March 2

ed as a party

must either

ase should n

 ____ Nath

Unit

20, 2015. D

y. 

r file a mot

not be rema

__________ hanael M. C

ted States M

Dkt. No. 26

tion to be su

anded to sta

__________ Cousins 

Magistrate J

6. To date, 

ubstituted a

ate court for

____ 

Judge 

FDIC 

as a 

r lack 

Case 5:15-cv-00210-LHK Document 28 Filed 03/27/15 Page 2 of 2