Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02611/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02611-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COREY COLEMAN GRAY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2611 DFL DAD P

vs.

JERRY CARDOZA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On July 5, 2006, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Objections,” which the court

construes as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed June 27, 2006,

determining that this action was properly removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), dismissing

the complaint and ordering plaintiff to file an amended complaint, denying appointment of

counsel, and disregarding certain documents filed by plaintiff. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-

303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 

Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s

ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:05-cv-02611-RRB-DAD Document 37 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed June 27, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: 9/28/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-02611-RRB-DAD Document 37 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2