Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-4_11-cv-00183/USCOURTS-azd-4_11-cv-00183-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 864
Nature of Suit: Social Security - SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42:1383 Review of HHS Decision

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mohamed Alenizi, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social

Security Administration, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV- 11-183-TUC-JGZ-DTF

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States

Magistrate Judge D. Thomas Ferraro. (Doc. 23.) The Report and Recommendation

recommends that the Court remand this matter to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)

because the ALJ’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence in the record and free

of legal error.

 The Court reviews de novo the objected to portions of the Report and

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); FED.R.CIV.P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear

error the unobjected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. Johnson v. Zema

Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d

1203, 1204 (D.Or. 1998). 

A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the

Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court

will not consider any objections or new evidence.

Case 4:11-cv-00183-JGZ Document 24 Filed 04/03/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s

recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72;

Johnson, 170 F.3d at 739; Conley, 14 F. Supp. 2d at 1204. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) is

ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

(2) This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instruction as outlined in the

Remedy section of the Report and Recommendation. See Report and Recommendation 10-

11.

(3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

Dated this 2nd day of April, 2012. 

Case 4:11-cv-00183-JGZ Document 24 Filed 04/03/12 Page 2 of 2