Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00430/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-00430-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 710
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[REVISED PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. 06-00430 PJH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND DIVISION 

THOMAS ROSENBURG, JOHN 

SHELLY and EXALDO TOPACIO, on 

behalf of themselves and classes of those 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 

MACHINES CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

Case No. CV 06-00430 PJH 

COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CLASS 

ACTION 

 [REVISED PROPOSED] FINAL 

JUDGMENT 

Case 4:06-cv-00430-PJH Document 130 Filed 07/12/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[REVISED PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. CV 06-00430 PJH - 1 - 

WHEREAS, on January 11, 2007, this Court granted preliminary approval to a 

settlement of this action, embodied in the Settlement Agreement, attached as Exhibit 1 to this 

Court’s January 11, 2007 order; 

WHEREAS, the Court granted final approval to the settlement on July _____, 

2007, finding that the settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate within the meaning of Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e) and applicable law; and 

WHEREAS, the Court has found that the notice sent to the Class Members fairly 

and adequately informed the Class and Subclasses of the terms of the settlement, was consistent 

with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and due process, and was given in the manner prescribed 

by the Settlement Agreement and the Court’s order preliminarily approving the settlement: 

This Court hereby enters final judgment in this case, and dismisses it with 

prejudice, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, attached as Exhibit 1 to the 

January 11, 2007 order granting preliminary approval, and the Order (1) Confirming Final 

Certification of Classes and Collective Action; and (2) Granting Final Approval to Class Action 

Settlement (“Final Approval Order”). The Court hereby permanently enjoins and restrains all 

individuals from asserting any and all claims that were released pursuant to the Settlement 

Agreement and the Final Approval Order. This Final Judgment shall not bind the persons listed 

in Exhibit A, who have timely opted out of the settlement class. 

\\ 

\\ 

\\ 

\\ 

\\ 

\\ 

11

Case 4:06-cv-00430-PJH Document 130 Filed 07/12/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[REVISED PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 

CASE NO. CV 06-00430 PJH - 2 - 

Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment in any way, the Court 

reserves exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over this action, the Named Plaintiffs, the Class 

and Subclasses, and the Defendant for the purposes of (a) supervising the implementation, 

enforcement, construction and interpretation of the Settlement Agreement, the Preliminary 

Approval Order, the Final Approval Order, and this Final Judgment and the distribution of 

Settlement Payments and tax forms; and (b) hearing, determining and implementing the 

application, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, by Class Counsel for an 

award of attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses and by the Named Plaintiffs for service payments. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 

United States District Judge 

7/12/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-00430-PJH Document 130 Filed 07/12/07 Page 3 of 3