Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02854/USCOURTS-cand-3_14-cv-02854-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIMBERLY BOHNERT,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP 

OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 14-cv-02854-WHO 

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY 

DISPUTE REGARDING DEPOSITION 

SCHEDULING

Re: Dkt. No. 59

The parties have filed a joint dispute statement regarding a dispute over scheduling 

depositions. Dkt. No. 59. On March 25, 2015, plaintiff provided defendants a list of nine 

witnesses that she wished to depose. As of April 8, 2015, defendants had offered dates for two of 

the witnesses. Defendants state that they expect to be able to complete the scheduling this week, 

except for the witnesses who are unavailable this week due to spring break, whose depositions will 

be scheduled as soon as possible.

The parties should continue to meet and confer to schedule the remaining depositions at 

issue. The depositions should be scheduled by April 17, 2015, which will be three and a half 

weeks since plaintiff first identified the witnesses. That is more than enough time to find suitable 

dates.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 9, 2015

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:14-cv-02854-WHO Document 60 Filed 04/09/15 Page 1 of 1