Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01376/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01376-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AUBREY STRICKSTEIN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

)

JEFF WRIGLEY, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

___________________________________ )

1:06-cv-01376 -AWI WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RE

MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF

PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS

[Doc. 3,4]

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a petition

for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pending before the court is

Respondent’s motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not opposed the motion.

On April 10, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations that

recommended Respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted and the petition dismissed because

it has become moot. These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and

contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were

Case 1:06-cv-01376-AWI-WMW Document 6 Filed 06/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The court notes that the copy of the findings and recommendations served on Petitioner 1

was returned by the United States Postal Service. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service on a

party at their address of record is fully effective.

2

to be filed within thirty days. Petitioner did not file objections. 

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has

conducted a de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708

F.2d 452, 454 (9 Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the th

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April

10, 2007, are a adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED;

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to

close this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 13, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01376-AWI-WMW Document 6 Filed 06/13/07 Page 2 of 2