Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00540/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-00540-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

James H. Fisher,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 05-0540 MCE PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

N. Dizon, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner prosecuting this civil rights

action without counsel. 

July 15, 2005, the court dismissed plaintiff’s claims

against defendants Cameron, A. Crawford, Walker, Austria, Brida,

Cruz and Wann pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, with leave to amend. 

The court informed plaintiff he could proceed against defendants

N. Dizon, M. Powers, J. Anunciation, J. Barrientos, F. Mendoza,

G. Rosales, S. Swain, Yarber, Sumner, Newsom, Cry, R. St.

Germain, Grannis, Pearson and Teresa Schwartz by submitting 

Case 2:05-cv-00540-MCE -EFB Document 9 Filed 08/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

materials for service within 15 days, but the court would

construe his election so to proceed as consent to dismissal of

his claims against defendants Cameron, A. Crawford, Walker,

Austria, Brida, Cruz and Wann without leave to amend. 

August 1, 2005, plaintiff submitted materials for service of

defendants N. Dizon, M. Powers, J. Anunciation, J. Barrientos,

F. Mendoza, G. Rosales, S. Swain, Yarber, Sumner, Newsom, Cry, R.

St. Germain, Grannis, Pearson and Teresa Schwartz. I find

plaintiff has consented to dismissal of claims against defendants

Cameron, A. Crawford, Walker, Austria, Brida, Cruz and Wann

without leave to amend. 

Accordingly, the court hereby recommends that claims against

defendants Cameron, A. Crawford, Walker, Austria, Brida, Cruz and

Wann be dismissed without prejudice. 

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: August 4, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00540-MCE -EFB Document 9 Filed 08/05/05 Page 2 of 2