Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-02130/USCOURTS-cand-5_02-cv-02130-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 690
Nature of Suit: Other Forfeiture and Penalty Suits
Cause of Action: 21:881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700667724v1 - 1 - DECL. OF V. GRANNEMAN RE ORDERS OF 

DISMISSAL AND SECOND REQ. TO EXTEND 

DATE OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

VERNON H. GRANNEMAN #83532 

DIANNE L. SWEENEY #187198 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1114 

Telephone: (650) 233-4500 

Facsimile: (650) 233-4545 

Attorneys for 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

REAL PROPERTY AT 

1) 7900 BALD EAGLE DRIVE, 

 PARK CITY, UTAH; AND 

2) 7871 REDTAIL COURT, 

 PARK CITY, UTAH, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 02-2130 JF 

DECLARATION OF VERNON H. 

GRANNEMAN RE SEPTEMBER 29, 

2006 AND JANUARY 5, 2007 

ORDERS OF DISMISSAL, 

CERTIFICATION OF FAILURE TO 

PAY SETTLEMENT AMOUNT AND 

SECOND REQUEST TO EXTEND 

DATE OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL – AND ORDER 

THEREON 

I, Vernon H. Granneman, declare: 

1. I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of 

California, am admitted to the Bar of this Court and am a member of the law firm Pillsbury 

Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, attorneys for Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) in the above-captioned 

matter. The following declaration is based on my personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, 

I could and would testify competently to the matters stated herein. 

2. On September 29, 2006, the Court entered an Order of Dismissal in the abovecaptioned matter, conditioned on full satisfaction of a settlement agreed to between and among 

**E-filed 4/11/07**

Case 5:02-cv-02130-JF Document 52 Filed 04/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

700667724v1 - 2 - DECL. OF V. GRANNEMAN RE ORDERS OF 

DISMISSAL AND SECOND REQ. TO EXTEND 

DATE OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 

the interested parties. The Court’s September 29 Order of Dismissal was extended to April 5, 

2007 by further order of this Court filed on January 5, 2007 based on Cisco’s request for an 

extension amid ongoing efforts among the interested parties to conclude the settlement. (The 

September 29, 2006 and January 5, 2007, Orders of Conditional Dismissal are hereinafter referred 

to collectively as the “Order of Dismissal.”) Per the terms of the Order of Dismissal, this 

declaration constitutes certification on behalf of Cisco that the agreed consideration for said 

settlement has not been delivered over. 

3. Although the Order of Dismissal (as extended by the Court) provides that upon the 

filing of this certification on or before April 5, 2007, the Order of Dismissal “SHALL STAND 

VACATED and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial,” Cisco 

proposes that the Court extend the Order of Dismissal an additional 30 to 60 days on the same 

terms and conditions as the original Order. The interested parties have reached agreement in 

principle as to the disposition of certain funds of Defendant Robert Gordon that will be used, in 

part, to pay the remaining amounts due Cisco on its settlement with Gordon. A written 

circulation has been circulated among counsel for the interested parties for review and signature. 

Accordingly, I expect that the settlement will be concluded within the next 30-60 days and 

request a further extension of the Order of Dismissal in lieu of restoring the matter to the civil 

active list. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 

5, 2007 at Palo Alto, California. 

 /s/ Vernon H. Granneman 

 Vernon H. Granneman 

The Order of Dismissal is extended to ______________, 2007. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 _______________________________ 

 United States District Judge 

June 8

4/6/07 Jeremy Fogel

Case 5:02-cv-02130-JF Document 52 Filed 04/11/07 Page 2 of 2