Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07228/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-07228-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 790
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05:704 Labor Litigation

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING TO FILING OF SECOND AMENDED 

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND ANSWER THERETO CASE NO. 06-07228 MJJ 

BANNING MICKLOW & BULL LLP 

Eugene A. Brodsky, SBN 36691 

Kurt Micklow, SBN 113974 

Edward M. Bull, III, SBN 141996 

One Market, Steuart Tower, Suite 1440 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 399-9191 

Facsimile: (415) 399-9192 

KEMNITZER, ANDERSON, BARRON & OGILVIE, LLP 

Mark F. Anderson, SBN 44787 

Matthew S. Da Vega, SBN 195443 

445 Bush Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Telephone: (415) 861-2265 

Facsimile: (415) 861-3151 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Clyde Wylie 

and the Proposed Plaintiff Class 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Robert W. Tollen, SBN 38875 

Alison B. Moser, SBN 223065 

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Foss Maritime Company 

UNITED STATES DISCTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CLYDE WYLIE, on behalf of himself 

and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

FOSS MARITIME COMPANY, a 

Washington corporation, and DOES 1-

25, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. C06-7228 MJJ 

CLASS ACTION 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

REGARDING FILING OF SECOND 

AMENDED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT AND ANSWER THERETO 

[FRCP RULE 15(a)]

Case 3:06-cv-07228-MHP Document 11 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- 

Individual and Representative Plaintiff Clyde Wylie on behalf of himself and all 

others similarly situated (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Foss Maritime Company (“Foss”) 

hereby submit their Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Filing of Second Amended 

Class Action Complaint and Answer thereto as follows: 

RECITALS

On August 25, 2006, Plaintiff filed this action against Foss in the Contra Costa 

Superior Court (Wylie v. Foss Maritime Company, Case No. C06-01685) (“the State Court 

Action”); 

On or about October 20, 2006, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint in the 

State Court Action and the summons and First Amended Complaint were thereafter served 

on Foss on or about October 23, 2006; 

On or about November 20, 2006, Foss filed its Response to the First Amended 

Complaint in the State Court Action; 

On or about November 22, 2006 Foss filed its Notice of Removal in this Court 

which removed the State Court Action to federal court pursuant to the Class Action 

Fairness Act of 2005; 

Plaintiff desires to file a Second Amended Class Action Complaint which adds 

three current and/or former employees of Foss as representative plaintiffs; 

Defendant Foss is willing to consent to the filing of Plaintiff’s Second Amended 

Complaint provided that its Response to the First Amended Complaint, that generally 

denies the allegations of the First Amended Complaint and raises affirmative defenses, 

will be considered its answer to the Second Amended Complaint. 

 STIPULATION

Accordingly, Plaintiff and Defendant Foss hereby stipulate and agree, by and 

through their respective counsel of record herein, pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure that the Court be respectfully requested to order that: 

1) Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint attached herewith be filed; and 

Case 3:06-cv-07228-MHP Document 11 Filed 05/29/07 Page 2 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- 

2) Defendant Foss’ Response to the First Amended Complaint be deemed 

its Answer to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. . 

Dated: May 8, 2007 BANNING MICKLOW & BULL LLP 

By: /S/ Kurt Micklow

 Kurt Micklow 

 Attorneys for the Plaintiffs 

and the Proposed Plaintiffs Class 

I hereby attest that I have written authorization for any signatures indicted by a 

“conformed” signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 

By: /s/ Kurt Micklow

 Kurt Micklow

Dated: May 8, 2007 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

By: /S/ Robert W. Tollen

 Robert W. Tollen 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Foss Maritime Company 

ORDER

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

5/23/07

Case 3:06-cv-07228-MHP Document 11 Filed 05/29/07 Page 3 of 3