Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-01141/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-01141-6/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION

FOR DISMISSAL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, OF NAMED

DEFENDANTS CITY OF OAKLAND, OFFICERS BERGERON,

J. FARRELL, M. RODRIGUEZ, R. LEE, D. UNDERWOOD,

AND H. KIDD, AND SGT. B. BROCK; ORDER

Brown. v. City of Oakland, et al. (No. C-03-1141-TEH) - 1 - 03-0002P035.REQDISM

Russell Robinson (163937)

Law Office of Russell A. Robinson

345 Grove Street, Level One

San Francisco CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 255-0462

Facsimile: (415) 431-4526

Attorneys for Plaintiff

OLEWASAMI BROWN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OLEWASAMI BROWN ,

Plaintiff,

v.

OFFICERS JOHN L. GUTIERREZ, R.

WINDGATE, T. F. ABEROUETTE, E.

RICHOLT, and, DOES 1-100,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C-03-1141-TEH

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF MOTION

AND MOTION FOR DISMISSAL,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, OF NAMED

DEFENDANTS CITY OF OAKLAND,

OFFICERS BERGERON, J. FARRELL,

M. RODRIGUEZ, R. LEE, D.

UNDERWOOD, AND H. KIDD, AND

SGT. B. BROCK; ORDER

[Jury Trial Demanded]

Trial Date: June 6, 2006

NOTICE

PLAINTIFF hereby gives notice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule

41(a)(1), that he is moving to dismiss and dismissing without prejudice named DEFENDANTS

CITY OF OAKLAND, OFFICERS BERGERON, J. FARRELL, M. RODRIGUEZ, R. LEE, D.

UNDERWOOD, AND H. KIDD, AND SGT. B. BROCK.

Case 3:03-cv-01141-TEH Document 96 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION

FOR DISMISSAL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, OF NAMED

DEFENDANTS CITY OF OAKLAND, OFFICERS BERGERON,

J. FARRELL, M. RODRIGUEZ, R. LEE, D. UNDERWOOD,

AND H. KIDD, AND SGT. B. BROCK; ORDER

Brown. v. City of Oakland, et al. (No. C-03-1141-TEH) - 2 - 03-0002P035.REQDISM

By agreement with the defense, the dismissed defendants shall be subject to being called

a trial of this matter upon reasonable notice to defense counsel.

Date: /S/ 

Law Office of Russell A. Robinson

Attorneys for Plaintiff

OLEWASAMI BROWN

ORDER

Based on the above, and good cause appearing,

The Court hereby orders as follows:

Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND, OFFICERS BERGERON, J. FARRELL, M.

RODRIGUEZ, R. LEE, D. UNDERWOOD, AND H. KIDD, AND SGT. B. BROCK are hereby

dismissed without prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and fees.

The individual defendants shall appear at trial to testify as witnesses at mutually

convenient times to be arranged through counsel of record in advance of the June 6, 2006, trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

HONORABLE THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Court, N.Dist. of California

4/25/06 trial, the date of which is yet to be determined.

Case 3:03-cv-01141-TEH Document 96 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 2