Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-01854/USCOURTS-casd-3_06-cv-01854-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON 

CASE NO.: 06-CV-1854-L(NLS) CASE TITLE: Mytee Products v. Harris Research

E-FILED DATE: 3/6/07 DOCKET NO.: 16

DOCUMENT TITLE: Amended Counterclaim

DOCUMENT FILED BY: Harris Research, Inc.

Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: 

x Civil Local Rule or 

Electronic Case Filing

Administrative Policies and

Procedures Manual provision

(“ECF”)

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(h) Includes a proposed order or requires judge’s signature

ECF § 2(a), (g) Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document filed

ECF § 2(g) Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments

ECF § 2(f) Lacking proper signature

Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation

Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not

timely

Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate

document

Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions

Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Missing table of contents 

Civ. L. Rule 15.1 Amended pleading not complete in itself

Civ. L. Rule 30.1 Depositions not accepted absent a court order

Supplemental documents require court order

X OTHER: the filing of an amended counterclaim is premature until the joint

motion is ruled upon.

Case 3:06-cv-01854-CAB Document 17 Filed 03/07/07 Page 1 of 2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant

documents may be stricken from the record.

X The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and

serve a copy of this order on all parties.

Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing

Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1.

DATED: March 7, 2007

M. James Lorenz

United States District Court Judge

cc: All Parties

Case 3:06-cv-01854-CAB Document 17 Filed 03/07/07 Page 2 of 2