Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01631/USCOURTS-cand-4_06-cv-01631-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 820
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

---

1 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Joint Reply Brief Case No. C 06-01631 PJH 

#26473 v3

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Roger Myers (CA State Bar No. 146164) 

Rachel Matteo-Boehm (CA State Bar No. 195492) 

Adam Brezine (CA State Bar No. 220852) 

HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP

560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 

Telephone: (415) 268-2000 

Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 

Attorneys for Defendants 

BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC., 

BEST BUY CO., INC., and 

SPRINT CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GEE JEFFERY & PARTNERS 

ADVERTISING, INC. 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC., et 

al., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. C 06-01631 PJH 

(Related to Case No. C 05-04656 PJH) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

ALLOWING DEFENDANTS TO FILE JOINT 

REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS 

FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 

Hearing Date: November 29, 2006 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom 3, 17th Floor 

Defendants Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc. (collectively, “Best Buy”), 

Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”), and AMC Entertainment, Inc. (“AMC”), along with Plaintiff Gee 

Jeffery & Partners Advertising, Inc. (“GJP”), submit the following stipulation and proposed order: 

1. Defendants Best Buy, Sprint, and AMC filed two separate motions for judgment on 

the pleadings – one on behalf of Best Buy and Sprint, the other on behalf of AMC. With this Court’s 

permission (and without objection by the Defendants), Plaintiff GJP filed one overlength response to 

these motions (also including a response to a separate motion filed by Defendants Identity Arts, 

LLC, David Janssen, and David Bobrow). 

Case 4:06-cv-01631-PJH Document 50 Filed 11/08/06 Page 1 of 3
 2 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Joint Reply Brief Case No. C 06-01631 PJH 

#26473 v3

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2. Because the issues GJP raised in response to the motions filed by Best Buy, Sprint 

and AMC are similar, Defendants Best Buy, Sprint, and AMC seek to file one joint reply brief in 

support of their respective motions, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length. 

3. Plaintiff GJP agrees to this proposal. 

THEREFORE, the undersigned counsel to the parties to this stipulation hereby stipulate and 

agree that Defendants Best Buy, Sprint, and AMC, may file a joint reply brief in support of their 

separate motions for judgment on the pleadings, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: November 6, 2006 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 

Roger R. Myers 

Rachel E. Matteo-Boehm 

Adam Brezine 

By: /s/ 

 

_____________________________________ 

Roger Myers 

 

Attorneys for Defendants 

BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC., 

BEST BUY CO., INC., and 

SPRINT CORPORATION 

Dated: November 6, 2006 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 

Robert F. Hinton 

David Martinez 

By: /s/ 

 

______________________________________ 

Robert F. Hinton 

 

Attorneys for Defendant 

AMC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 

Case 4:06-cv-01631-PJH Document 50 Filed 11/08/06 Page 2 of 3
 3 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Joint Reply Brief Case No. C 06-01631 PJH 

#26473 v3

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: November 6, 2006 DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP 

Michael E. Dergosits 

Omair M. Farooqui 

By: /s/ 

 

_________________________________ 

Michael Dergosits 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

GEE JEFFERY & PARTNERS ADVERTISING, 

INC. 

SO ORDERED. 

November __, 2006 

 

United States District Judge 

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:06-cv-01631-PJH Document 50 Filed 11/08/06 Page 3 of 3