Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00650/USCOURTS-cand-5_10-cv-00650-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances

1

underlying the present motion.

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MADHVAMUNI K DAS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WMC MORTGAGE CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 10-0650 PVT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; AND

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING

Six of the Defendants have filed (or joined in) motions to dismiss which are currently

scheduled for hearing on May 4, 2010. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiffs were required to 1

file either an opposition or else a statement of non-opposition no later than April 13, 2010. Plaintiffs

failed to file any opposition or statement of non-opposition. Based on the file herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later May 11, 2010, Plaintiff shall file, for each pending

motion, either a brief and supporting declaration showing cause why the motion to dismiss should

not be granted or else a statement of non-opposition. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on the pending motions is CONTINUED to

June 1, 2010. 

Dated: 4/28/10

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00650-LHK Document 31 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 1