Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02542/USCOURTS-caed-2_05-cv-02542-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD LAY, Jr.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-2542 LKK EFB P

vs.

HALL,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, litigates this civil rights action pro se and in forma pauperis.

On June 16, 2006, defendant moved to dismiss this action upon the grounds that the court

lacks subject matter jurisdiction and that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief

can be granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6). On July 26, 2006, the court informed plaintiff

that failure to file a written opposition or a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver

of any opposition to the motion, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an opposition or statement of no

opposition and warned him that failure to do so could result in dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(b). 

The 30 days have passed and plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of no

opposition and has not otherwise responded to the July 26, 2006, order. 

////

Case 2:05-cv-02542-LKK -EFB Document 18 Filed 09/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Dated: September 14, 2006.

\lay2542.f&r ft opp motion 

Case 2:05-cv-02542-LKK -EFB Document 18 Filed 09/14/06 Page 2 of 2