Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00418/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00418-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

Case No. 1:13-CV-00418-LJO-SKO: ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' FILING OF FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT, FRCivP 15(a)(2)

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114)

JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268)

GINA ALTOMARE (State Bar No. 273099)

GENEVIEVE K. GUERTIN (State Bar No. 262479)

HADDAD & SHERWIN

505 Seventeenth Street

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-5500

Fax: (510) 452-5510

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JAIME REYES, JR., MIRELLA REYES and

JAIME REYES, SR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAIME REYES JR. Deceased, 

THROUGH HIS SUCESSORS IN 

INTEREST MIRELLA REYES and 

JAIME REYES SR.; MIRELLA REYES, 

Individually; and JAIME REYES SR., 

Individually,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CITY OF FRESNO, a public entity, CITY 

OF FRESNO POLICE CHIEF JERRY 

DYER in his individual and official 

capacities, and DOES 1 through 10, 

Jointly and Severally,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:13-CV-00418-LJO-SKO

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' FILING OF

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, 

FRCivP 15(a)(2)

Case 1:13-cv-00418-DAD-SKO Document 34 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 1:13-CV-00418-LJO-SKO: ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' FILING OF FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT, FRCivP 15(a)(2)

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation (Doc. 32), the Court hereby orders that Plaintiffs may 

file a First Amended Complaint (attached as an exhibit to the Stipulation of the Parties for 

Plaintiffs to File First Amended Complaint (Doc. 32, Exh. A)), which includes the substitution of 

the following parties in place of previously named Doe Defendants: Juan Avila (for Doe 

Defendant 1) and Miguel Alvarez (for Doe Defendant 2), as well as substantive amendments of 

Plaintiffs’ claims – regarding which the parties have conferred and which Defendants have 

advised Plaintiffs that Defendants do not object under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. Nothing in this Order 

shall be construed as a stipulation by any of the Defendants that any or all of the allegations of the

amended complaint are true or as any admission of liability by any of the Defendants.

Plaintiffs shall file the First Amended Complaint as a separate entry on the docket within 

three (3) days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 1, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00418-DAD-SKO Document 34 Filed 11/01/13 Page 2 of 2