Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-00939/USCOURTS-cand-3_17-cv-00939-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER RE LETTER DATED

MARCH 13, 2017

The Court has reviewed defendants’ letter dated March 13, 2017 (Dkt. No. 42). Defense

counsel shall please bring to the case management conference on March 16 the specific

person(s) in Uber’s legal department who defendants believe should be able to see the redacted

materials at issue, as well as the resumes for such person(s). The Court requests, however, that

counsel for both sides work this snafu out before the case management conference on March 16. 

Plaintiff should remember that it seeks extraordinary and drastic relief. Every day counts, but

preliminary relief may be postponed until this problem is resolved.

Plaintiff shall please respond to defendants’ letter by MARCH 15 AT NOON.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 44 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 1