Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_94-cv-00671/USCOURTS-caed-2_94-cv-00671-28/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Re-Schedule Hearing Date and

Briefing Schedule on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement Complaint

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

ROCHELLE C. EAST

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

BENJAMIN T. RICE, State Bar No. 199754

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

Post Office Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 324-2445

Facsimile: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Schwarzenegger, et al.

CA1997CS0005

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

JERRY VALDIVIA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:94-cv-0671 LKK GGH P

STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO

RE-SCHEDULE HEARING DATE

AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO

SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT

THE PARTIES BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL HEREBY STIPULATE

AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. On June 21, 2006, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File a First Supplemental Civil

Class Action Complaint. The hearing for the motion was set for August 7, 2006. 

2. Defendants’ counsel recently called Plaintiffs counsel to ask that the hearing date and

briefing schedule be changed. Defendants’ counsel informed Plaintiffs’ counsel that he would

be on vacation for two weeks over the next six weeks including up to the day before the hearing. 

Additionally the parties were scheduled to meet with each other or with the special master on at 

///

Case 2:94-cv-00671-LKK-GGH Document 1287 Filed 07/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation to Re-Schedule Hearing Date and

Briefing Schedule on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement Complaint

2

least 7 days over this period. Defendants’ counsel then called the Court and was informed that

the next hearing date that was available was August 28, 2006. 

3. The parties have met and conferred and agreed to move the hearing date to August 28,

2006. Additionally, the parties have agreed that Defendants’ opposition brief will now be due

August 9, 2006. Finally, Plaintiffs’ reply brief will be due on August 21, 2006. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 30, 2006

Dated: June 30, 2006

Respectfully submitted,

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

ROCHELLE C. EAST

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

/ S / Benjamin T. Rice

BENJAMIN T. RICE

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

ROSEN, BIEN, & ASARO, LLP

/ S / Gay Grunfeld

GAY GRUNFELD

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: By: 

The Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton

United States District Court

BTR:tc

30133244.wpd

Case 2:94-cv-00671-LKK-GGH Document 1287 Filed 07/06/06 Page 2 of 2