Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-01013/USCOURTS-cand-5_07-cv-01013-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Requiring Respondent to Lodge Additional Exhibits

P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.07\jones013exh.wpd

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLOYZELLE K. JONES,

Petitioner,

 vs.

BEN CURRY, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 07-1013 RMW (PR)

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT

TO LODGE ADDITIONAL

EXHIBITS

Petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Following a review of the petition, the court found

petitioner’s claims cognizable and ordered respondents to show cause why the petition should

not be granted. Respondents filed an answer denying the merits of the petition, along with a

supporting memorandum and exhibits.

Respondents filed numerous exhibits, but failed to include the decision of the Supreme

Court of California denying the petition for habeas corpus. In their answer, respondents state

that the Supreme Court denied the petition in a “reasoned decision” and cites to Exhibit 6,

attached to their answer. (Resp. Ans., p. 2.) However, Exhibit 6 merely includes computer print

outs of the California Appellate Court case information.

Accordingly, within seven (7) days of the date this order is filed, respondent shall lodge

(or file and serve on petitioner) the actual opinion or order of the Supreme Court of California

*E-FILED - 2/9/10*

Case 5:07-cv-01013-RMW Document 10 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Requiring Respondent to Lodge Additional Exhibits

P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.07\jones013exh.wpd 2

denying petitioner’s state habeas petition on September 13, 2006. If respondents choose to lodge

this supplemental exhibit, as opposed to filing and serving it on petitioner, they shall file and

serve on petitioner a notice of lodging supplemental exhibits. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___8____________ 

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

2/8/10

Case 5:07-cv-01013-RMW Document 10 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 2