Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00407/USCOURTS-caed-1_09-cv-00407-63/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

---

DIEPENBROCK 

HARRISON

A PROFESSIONAL 

CORPORATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO FILE PROPOSED JUDGMENT

COUNSEL IDENTIFICATION AT END 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION 

THE DELTA SMELT CASES 

SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER 

AUTHORITY et al. v. SALAZAR et al. (Case 

No. 1:09-cv-407) 

STATE WATER CONTRACTORS v. 

SALAZAR et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-422) 

COALITION FOR A SUSTAINABLE DELTA 

et al. v. UNITED STATES FISH AND 

WIDLIFE SERVICE et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv480) 

METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT v. 

UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE 

SERVICE et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-631) 

STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS et al. v. 

UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE 

SERVICE et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-892) 

1:09-cv-00407-OWW-GSA 

1:09-cv-00422-OWW-GSA 

1:09-cv-00631-OWW-GSA 

1:09-cv-00892-OWW-GSA 

PARTIALLY CONSOLIDATED WITH: 

1:09-cv-00480-OWW-GSA 

 

SECOND STIPULATION AND 

ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO FILE 

JUDGMENT ON REMAINING 

CLAIMS 

Judge: Honorable Oliver W. Wanger 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00407-LJO-BAM Document 835 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 5
DIEPENBROCK 

HARRISON

A PROFESSIONAL 

CORPORATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

- 1 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO FILEJUDGMENT

Pursuant to Minute Order, Document 782, in the Consolidated Delta Smelt Cases, the 

Court requested a proposed judgment by February 14, 2011, consistent with the prior orders of 

this court, entering judgment on all claims in the consolidated cases for which final judgment has 

not yet been entered. The parties subsequently stipulated to and the Court granted an extension 

of this deadline to February 22, 2011. The parties have been discussing the issue but require 

more time to research the issue and finalize their positions. All parties in this action, by and 

through their respective counsel of record, as identified below, therefore stipulate as follows: 

All parties request a further extension to and including March 15, 2011 by which time 

the parties will submit (a) a proposed judgment; (b) their respective positions with respect to the 

proposed judgment, and/or (c) a request for a conference with the Court regarding the proposed 

judgment. 

SO STIPULATED

Dated: February 22, 2011 KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & 

GIRARD, A Law Corporation 

DIEPENBROCK HARRISON 

A Professional Corporation 

By: /s/_[Eileen M. Diepenbrock]______________ 

EILEEN M. DIEPENBROCK 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER 

AUTHORITY AND WESTLANDS WATER 

DISTRICT 

Dated: February 22, 2011 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK LLP

By: : /s/_[Steve O. Sims] (as authorized)

STEVE O. SIMS 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00407-LJO-BAM Document 835 Filed 02/24/11 Page 2 of 5
DIEPENBROCK 

HARRISON

A PROFESSIONAL 

CORPORATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO FILEJUDGMENT

Dated: February 22, 2011 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

By: /s/ [Gregory K. Wilkinson](as authorized)

GREGORY K. WILKINSON 

STEVEN M. ANDERSON 

PAETER E. GARCIA 

MELISSA R. CUSHMAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

STATE WATER CONTRACTORS 

Dated: February 22, 2011 NOSSAMAN LLP

By: /s/ [Paul S. Weiland](as authorized)_______ 

ROBERT D. THORNTON 

PAUL S. WEILAND 

AUDREY HUANG 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

COALITION FOR A SUSTAINABLE DELTA 

and KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY 

Dated: February 22, 2011 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/_[William M. Sloan](as authorized)______ 

CHRISTOPHER J. CARR 

WILLIAM M. SLOAN 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

THE METROPOLITAN WATER 

DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 

Dated: February 22, 2011 PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION

By: /s/_[Brandon M. Middleton](as authorized)___ 

M. REED HOPPER 

DAMIEN M. SCHIFF 

BRANDON M. MIDDLETON 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS; 

ARROYO FARMS, LLC; and KING 

PISTACHIO GROVE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00407-LJO-BAM Document 835 Filed 02/24/11 Page 3 of 5
DIEPENBROCK 

HARRISON

A PROFESSIONAL 

CORPORATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

- 3 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO FILEJUDGMENT

Dated: February 22, 2011 THE BRENDA DAVIS LAW GROUP

By: /s/_[Brenda W. Davis](as authorized)_____ 

BRENDA W. DAVIS 

LESLIE R. WAGLEY 

 Attorneys For Plaintiff 

FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE 

Dated: February 22, 2011 KAMALA DEVI HARRIS, ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

By: /s/ [Cecilia L. Dennis](as authorized)_

CLIFFORD T. LEE 

CECILIA L. DENNIS 

MICHAEL M. EDSON 

ALLISON GOLDSMITH 

Deputies Attorney General 

Attorneys for Plaintiff-In-Intervention 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

WATER RESOURCES 

Dated: February 22, 2011 IGNACIA S. MORENO, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY 

GENERAL 

United State Department of Justice, 

Environmental & Natural Resources Division 

JEAN E. WILLIAMS, CHIEF 

By: /s/_[Ethan Carson Eddy]_(as authorized)___ 

ETHAN CARSON EDDY, Trial Attorney 

Wildlife & Marine Resources Section 

Attorneys for FEDERAL DEFENDANTS 

Dated: February 22, 2011 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL

By: : /s/_[Katherine Poole]_(as authorized)____ 

KATHERINE POOLE 

DOUG OBEGI 

Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenor 

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE 

COUNCIL 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00407-LJO-BAM Document 835 Filed 02/24/11 Page 4 of 5
DIEPENBROCK 

HARRISON

A PROFESSIONAL 

CORPORATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

- 4 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO FILEJUDGMENT

Dated: February 22, 2011 THE BAY INSTITUTE

By: /s/_[Trent W. Orr] (as authorized)________ 

TRENT W. ORR 

GEORGE M. TORGUN 

Attorneys For Defendant-Intervenor 

THE BAY INSTITUTE 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 24, 2011 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 1:09-cv-00407-LJO-BAM Document 835 Filed 02/24/11 Page 5 of 5