Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02961/USCOURTS-cand-3_03-cv-02961-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time / Case Nos. C-03-2962 TEH (JL) and C-03-2961 TEH (JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 

BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT 

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

Randolph W. Hall, State Bar No. 080142 

Chief Asst. City Attorney 

Office of the City Attorney 

One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor 

Oakland CA 94612 

Telephone: (510) 238-3601 

Facsimile: (510) 238-6500 

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND 

and POLICE CHIEF RICHARD WORD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SRI LOUISE COLES, et al. 

 Plaintiffs 

vs. 

CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal entity, et al. 

_____Defendants_______________________ 

LOCAL 10, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE 

AND WAREHOUSE UNION, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY OF OAKLAND; et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

File No. C -03-2961 TEH (JL) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THIRD 

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 

EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

CITY OF OAKLAND TO FILE ANSWER 

IN COLES ACTION

Case 3:03-cv-02961-TEH Document 74 Filed 06/23/05 Page 1 of 3
2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time / Case Nos. C-03-2962 TEH (JL) and C-03-2961 TEH (JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD: 

Based on the Plaintiffs’ in the Sri Louise Coles action, No. C -03-2961 TEH (JL) intention to 

file a Third Amended Complaint adding as defendants police officers identified in discovery whom 

Plaintiffs contend fired less lethal munitions in the course of this incident, it is agreed by and between 

said Plaintiffs’ counsel, Michael Haddad, and counsel for Defendants, Gregory M. Fox, that 

1. Plaintiffs in the Coles action may file a third amended complaint within 30 days 

from entry of the order attached to this stipulation; 

2. Counsel for the City of Oakland in this action will accept service of process on 

behalf of all currently employed police officers named in the third amended 

complaint, and for any such officers no longer employed by the City of Oakland, 

will provide Plaintiffs’ counsel with their last known address and will otherwise 

cooperate with Plaintiffs’ counsel in the service of those individuals; and 

3. Defendants will have an extension within which to file their Answer to the 

complaint of the Plaintiffs in said action until 30 days after service of the third 

amended complaint. 

Case 3:03-cv-02961-TEH Document 74 Filed 06/23/05 Page 2 of 3
3

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time / Case Nos. C-03-2962 TEH (JL) and C-03-2961 TEH (JL) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

So Stipulated: 

Dated: June 21, 2005 HADDAD & SHERWIN 

 By:_/s/ Michael Haddad______________ 

 Michael Haddad 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 SRI LOUISE COLES, et al. 

Dated: June 22, 2005 BERTRAND, FOX, & ELLIOT 

 By:__/s/ Gregory M. Fox_______________ 

 Gregory M. Fox 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 CITY OF OAKLAND, et al. 

 Good cause appearing, the stipulation is so ordered. 

Dated: _____________/s/_________________ 

 The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

Case 3:03-cv-02961-TEH Document 74 Filed 06/23/05 Page 3 of 3