Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-01500/USCOURTS-azd-2_11-cv-01500-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 220
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 Plaintiffs did ultimately file a late response and sought to amend the complaint for

the second time. Docs. 32 and 33.

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jane Ritzenthaler; Richard Ritzenthaler, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

Bank of America; et al., 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 11-1500-PHX-JAT

ORDER

On May 7, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 29). Plaintiffs failed to

timely respond. After their time to respond expired, Plaintiffs moved for an extension of

time. The Court granted that motion and issued the following Order:

On May 7, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss this case. After the

deadline to respond expired, Plaintiffs move for an extension of time to

respond. The Court will grant the motion; however, if Plaintiffs fail to respond

within this deadline, the Court will summarily grant the motion and dismiss the

case for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. See

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); Local Rule Civil 7.2(i); Ghazali v.

Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the

30 motion for extension of time is granted. Plaintiffs shall respond to the

motion to dismiss by July 13, 2012. 

Doc. 31.

Plaintiffs again failed to timely respond.1

 As the Court previously cautioned, the

Case 2:11-cv-01500-JAT Document 34 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Court will summarily grant the motion to dismiss for failure to comply with a Court order.

See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(b). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 29) is granted; the Clerk

of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs, with

prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any other pending motions are denied as moot.

DATED this 10th day of August, 2012.

Case 2:11-cv-01500-JAT Document 34 Filed 08/10/12 Page 2 of 2