Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04733/USCOURTS-cand-5_06-cv-04733-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 510
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States’ Request for Extension of Time and 

[Proposed] Order CR 98-20060 JW; C 06-04733 JW

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

EUMI L. CHOI (WVBN 722)

Assistant United States Attorney 150 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 900

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone: (408) 535-5061

Fax: (408) 535-5066

E-Mail: eumi.choi@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PHUOC XUAN NGO,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 98-20060 JW

No. C 06-04733 JW

UNITED STATES’ REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION

UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255; [PROPOSED]

ORDER

The United States respectfully requests a 60 day extension of time of its February 12, 2010

deadline to file its response to defendant’s Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“Response”), on the

grounds that thus far the United States’ has not been able to obtain copies of the relevant filings

and orders in the district court and appellate court records. Since soon after the date of the

December 10, 2009 court order requesting a Response from the United States, underlying

counsel attempted to obtain said filings and orders in order to prepare a Response; however, due

in large part to the age of the underlying criminal proceedings and the size of the record in the

district and appellate courts, attempts to obtain the relevant portions of the record remain

ongoing. A 60 day extension is respectfully requested to ensure a sufficient period of time to

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Ware

Case 5:06-cv-04733-JW Document 4 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States’ Request for Extension of Time and 

[Proposed] Order CR 98-20060 JW; C 06-04733 JW

obtain said filings and orders and to prepare a Response.

WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests a 60 day extension of time of its

February 12, 2010 deadline to file its response to defendant’s Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

DATED: February 5, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

____________/S/___________________

EUMI L. CHOI

Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

Based upon the representation of counsel and for good cause shown, the Court finds that

an extension of 60 days for the United States from February 11, 2010 to file its Response is

reasonable and appropriate. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States’ time

to file its response to defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration and Clarification is extended 60

days, to April 13, 2010.

DATED: ___________________ ___________________________

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

February 9, 2010

Case 5:06-cv-04733-JW Document 4 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 2