Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00530/USCOURTS-caed-1_15-cv-00530-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID LESLIE MANNING, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. STAINER, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

Case Nos. 1:15-cv-00530-DLB (PC)

 2:15-cv-02601-TLN-AC

ORDER RELATING CASES AND 

REASSIGNING ACTION TO MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE DENNIS L. BECK

New Case No. 1:16-cv-00049 LJO DLB (PC)

Plaintiff David Leslie Manning, Jr., a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on November 18, 2015, in Case 

No. 1:15-cv-01744-MJS (PC). The matter was transferred to the Sacramento Division on 

December 16, 2015, and assigned Case No. 2:15-cv-02601-AC. Plaintiff seeks relief from a 

decision by the Board of Parole Hearings denying early parole release. 

In his complaint in Case No. 2:15-cv-02601-AC, Plaintiff references filing the prior case of 

1:15-cv-00530 DLB PC which is currently pending screening before this Court. The Court’s 

review of these cases reveals that the case of Manning v. Stainer, 2:15-cv-02601-AC is related 

under Local Rule 123 to the action Manning v. Stainer, 1:15-cv-00530-DLB (PC). Both actions 

are based on the same or substantially similar underlying facts and involve overlapping questions 

of law and fact. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Case 1:15-cv-00530-LJO-DLB Document 13 Filed 01/14/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. The Office of the Clerk shall reassign case 2:15-cv-02601-AC and open a new case

in the Fresno Division; 

2. The new case number shall be:

1:16-cv-00049 LJO DLB (PC)

and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered; use of an 

incorrect case number or incorrect judge’s initials may result in delay in processing 

documents and distribution of copies to the judge assigned; and

3. The Office of the Clerk shall relate case 1:16-cv-00049 LJO DLB (PC) with case 

1:15-cv-00530-DLB (PC).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2016 /s/ Dennis L. Beck 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00530-LJO-DLB Document 13 Filed 01/14/16 Page 2 of 2