Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00367/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-00367-19/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 370
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL L. JIMENA, )

)

)

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

)

UBS AG BANK, et al., )

)

)

Defendants. )

)

)

No. CV-F-07-367 OWW/SKO

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

"REQUEST TO CLERK TO SUBMIT

COURT DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION

OF DOCUMENTS” (Doc 196)

On April 9, 2010, Plaintiff, proceeding in pro per, filed a

paper captioned "Request to Clerk to submit to Court Demand for

Production of Documents." (Doc. 196). Plaintiff asserts

therein:

In the conclusion of plaintiff's Opposition

to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment for

Judgment in Their Favor, With Attached

Plaintiff's Response to Defendants

Statementof Undisputedf Facts, please find

the portion quoted below:

'(2) Plaintiff be allowed to serve

on defendant UBS AG (and UBS FS if the Court

would permit) his discovery papers, demanding

particularly production of Exhibit 15 and 16,

1

Case 1:07-cv-00367-OWW -SKO Document 199 Filed 04/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

which will be lodged with the Court pursuant

to Local Rule 34-250 and Rule 34 of FRCP,

should this request be granted. As an

alternative to the request to serve formally

demand for production, plaintiff request that

Exhibit 73 already containing demand to

furnish plaintiff with Exhibit 15 and 17 be

treated as a demand for production by a pro

se litigant and defendants be ordered to

comply with plaintiff's demand for Exhibit 15

and 16 in Exhibit 73, by filing a copy of

Exhibit 15 and 16 directly in Court, copy

furnished the plaintiff.

Attached to this request is a copy of Exhibit

73 (containing a demand for a copy of Exhibit

15 and 16) and a copy of the formal Demand

for Production unsigned with blanks to be

filled in, which plaintiff will fill in and

serve to the Defendants after the Court

issues an order of approval, should the Court

still require a formal demand. [SIC]

Plaintiff's request is DENIED. If Plaintiff wishes to serve

a request for production of documents pursuant to the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure governing discovery, Plaintiff is

responsible for doing so. The Court is not a repository for

documents produced by the parties in discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

668554 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 1:07-cv-00367-OWW -SKO Document 199 Filed 04/28/10 Page 2 of 2