Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00529/USCOURTS-azd-2_09-cv-00529-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jodell Martinelli; Stephanie Booth; Melia

Perry; Abbigail King; Nicole Kersanty;

and Ruth Ross, on behalf of themselves

and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

Petland, Inc.; and The Hunte Corporation,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-529-PHX-DGC

ORDER

On August 7, 2009, the Court issued an order granting Defendants’ motions to

dismiss. Dkt. #49. The Court dismissed the complaint on the ground that it failed to meet

the pleading requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Id. at 3-10. The Court

dismissed the complaint without prejudice and gave Plaintiffs until August 29, 2009 to file

an amended complaint. Id. at 10-11.

Plaintiffs have filed a motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint.

Dkt. #50. The motion has been fully briefed. Dkt. ##51-52. The Court concludes that the

requested two-week extension of time is reasonable, that Plaintiffs have shown good cause,

and that Defendants will not be unfairly prejudiced. The Court will therefore grant Plaintiffs’

motion.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs’ motion for extension of time to file amended complaint (Dkt. #50)

Case 2:09-cv-00529-DGC Document 53 Filed 08/27/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

is granted.

2. Plaintiffs shall have until September 11, 2009 to file an amended complaint.

DATED this 27th day of August, 2009.

 

Case 2:09-cv-00529-DGC Document 53 Filed 08/27/09 Page 2 of 2