Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01926/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-01926-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 896
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Arbitration
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -0-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO.: 15-cv-01926-TEH

David Sturgeon-Garcia. Esq. (State Bar No. 157390)

THE LAW OFFICES OF DAVID STURGEON-GARCIA

1042 Country Club Drive, Suite 1A

Moraga, CA 94556

Telephone: 925.235.7290

Facsimile: 925.235.7319

Charles D. Marshall (State Bar No. 236444)

MARSHALL LAW FIRM

2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 290

Walnut Creek, CA 92596

Telephone: (925) 575-7105

Facsimile: (855) 575-7105

cdm@marshall-law-firm.com

Attorneys for Respondents Charlotte B. 

Milliner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BOCK EVANS FINANCIAL COUNSEL, 

LTD.,

Petitioner,

v.

CHARLOTTE B. MILLINER, 

individually and as trustee of the 

Charlotte B. Milliner Trust dated January 

30, 1997

Respondents.

Case No.: 15-cv-01926-TEH

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE 

AND EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR 

RESPONDENT’S RESPONSE TO, AND 

PETITIONER’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF, 

PETITIONER’S VOLUNTARY MOTION 

TO DISMISS 

Judge: Thelton E. Henderson

Hearing Date: November 2, 2015

Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m.

MODIFIED

Case 3:15-cv-01926-TEH Document 22 Filed 10/13/15 Page 1 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 1 -

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO.: 15-CV-01926-TEH

Bock Evans Financial Counsel, Ltd. (“Petitioner”) and Charlotte B. Milliner, individually 

and as trustee of the Charlotte B. Milliner Trust dated January 30, 1997. (“Respondent”), 

(collectively “the Parties”) by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate and jointly move as 

follows, subject to Court approval:

WHEREAS, on September 24, 2015, Petitioner Bock Evans Financial Counsel, Ltd. filed 

a Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss With Prejudice with a hearing date set for November 2, 2015 

[Dkt. 16-1];

WHEREAS, on October 7, 2015, the Parties agreed, and Petitioner filed a notice, to 

continue the hearing date on the Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss With Prejudice to November 9, 

2015 at 10:00 a.m. [Dkt. No. 17];

WHEREAS a further case management conference is currently scheduled for that same 

date, November 9, 2015, but at 1:30 p.m., and both parties believe it would be most efficient to 

consolidate the motion to dismiss hearing with the case management hearing on November 9, 

2015 at 1:30 p.m.;

WHEREAS, under Local Rule 7-3(a), the Respondent’s opposition to the Motion is due 

on October 8, 2015, and Petitioner’s brief in support of its Motion is due on October 15, 2015;

WHEREAS, Respondent desires an additional 7 days—or until October 15, 2015—to 

respond to the issues raised in the Motion, and Petitioner has no objection to such an extension of 

time;

WHEREAS, Petitioner requests an extension of its deadline to file a reply brief to 

October 22, 2015, and Respondent has no objection to such an extension of time;

WHEREAS, this extension will not interfere with the requested continued hearing date of 

November 9, 2015, or any other matter calendared in this case; the Court will have ample time to 

Case 3:15-cv-01926-TEH Document 22 Filed 10/13/15 Page 2 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 2 -

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO.: 15-CV-01926-TEH

review the briefs prior to the hearing; no extensions have been requested in relation to the briefing 

of the Motion to Dismiss; and there has been no trial date set.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court 

(a) continue the hearing date for the Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss to November 9, 2015 at 1:30 

p.m.; (b) allow Respondent until October 15, 2015, to respond to Petitioner’s Motion to 

Voluntarily Dismiss, and (c) allow Petitioner until October 22, 2015, to allow a reply brief, if 

necessary.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Date: October 8, 2015

By: /s/ Chuck Marshall By: /s/ Katherine D. DiDinato

Chuck Marshall Katherine D. DiDinato

MARSHALL LAW FIRM SHUSTAK, REYNLODS &

2121 N. California Blvd., Ste. 290 PARTNERS, P.C.

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 410 West “A” Street, Suite 2250 

Telephone: (925) 575-7105 San Diego, CA 92101

Fax: (855) 575-7105 Telephone: (619) 696-9500

Telephone: (415) 981-4800 Facsimile: (619) 615-5290

Facsimile: (415) 981-4846

Attorneys for Petitioner

David Sturgeon-Garcia. Esq. 

THE LAW OFFICES OF 

DAVID STURGEON-GARCIA

1042 Country Club Drive, Suite 1A

Moraga, CA 94556

Telephone: 925.235.7290

Facsimile: 925.235.7319

Attorneys for Respondent

Case 3:15-cv-01926-TEH Document 22 Filed 10/13/15 Page 3 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 3 -

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO.: 15-CV-01926-TEH

ATTESTATION OF FILING

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Chuck Marshall, hereby attest 

that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Reschedule the Case 

Management Conference has been obtained from Katherine D. DiDinato with conformed 

signatures above.

Dated: October 8, 2015 By: /s/ Chuck Marshall

Chuck Marshall

MARSHALL LAW FIRM

2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 290

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Telephone: (925) 575-7105

Facsimile: (855) 575-7105

Case 3:15-cv-01926-TEH Document 22 Filed 10/13/15 Page 4 of 5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 - 4 -

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO.: 15-CV-01926-TEH

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing:

1. The November 2, 2015, hearing date in Bock Evans Financial Counsel, Ltd. v. 

Charlotte Milliner, Case No. 15-CV-01926-TEH, has been continued to November 9, 2105, at 

1:30 p.m. so as to be consolidated with the Case Management Conference set for that same date 

and time;

2. Respondent’s deadline to oppose the Motion to Dismiss be extended through 

October 15, 2015; and

3. Petitioner’s deadline to reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss be extended 

through October 22, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________________, 2015

_________________________________

The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson

10:00 a.m.

10/13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:15-cv-01926-TEH Document 22 Filed 10/13/15 Page 5 of 5