Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03836/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-03836-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 410
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NSIGHT, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

PEOPLESOFT, INC.,

Defendant(s). /

No. C 04-3836 MMC (MEJ)

ORDER RE-CALENDARING

MOTION TO COMPEL

On February 28, 2006, plaintiff nSight, Inc. filed a Motion to Compel Compliance with

Non-Party Subpoena Duces Tecum. The Court denied nSight's motion and ordered the parties to the

discovery dispute to meet and confer. The Court is now in receipt of nSight's letter, filed March 3,

2006, stating that non-party Forrester Research, Inc. refuses to meet and confer. As it appears that

the Court may not have jurisdiction over this dispute, the Court hereby VACATES the meet and

confer requirement and shall consider nSight's motion. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7, Forrester

shall file any opposition by March 23, 2006, nSight shall file a reply by March 30, 2006, and the

Court shall conduct a hearing on April 13, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450

Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. nSight shall serve this Order on Forrester by

March 8, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 6, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:04-cv-03836-MMC Document 100 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 1