Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00914/USCOURTS-caed-1_11-cv-00914-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICHOLAS MORAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

K. DUTRA, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

1:11-cv-914-LJO-MJS (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 12)

Plaintiff Nicholas Moran (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations,

recommending dismissal of certain of Plaintiff’s claims and Defendants. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff

has failed to file objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

analysis. 

///

///

///

///

-1-

Case 1:11-cv-00914-LJO-MJS Document 13 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 21, 2012, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his Eighth Amendment inadequate medical care

claim against Defendants Ryan and Dedee;

3. Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his Eighth Amendment excessive force claim

against Defendants Dutra and Auten;

4. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants John Does # 1-20 be dismissed; and

5. Defendants John Does #1-20 be dismissed from this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 10, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

Case 1:11-cv-00914-LJO-MJS Document 13 Filed 10/10/12 Page 2 of 2