Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01835/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-01835-39/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 442
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)

LAW OFFICES OF PAMELA Y. PRICE 

A Professional Law Corporation

Kaiser Center

300 Lakeshore Drive, Ste. 417

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 452-0292

Facsimile: (510) 452-5625

E-mail: pamela.price@pypesq.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IRMA B. SANCHEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

IRMA B. SANCHEZ, 

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SYDNEY 

SMYTH, and DOES 1 THROUGH 15, et al., 

Defendants.

 ___________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. 1:12-CV-01835-SAB

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

MODIFYING THE BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE 

The parties in the above-captioned action hereby stipulate by and through their undersigned 

counsel of record to request that this Court modify its previous Order approving a stipulation to amend 

the briefing schedule (Doc. 234) and extend the time for Plaintiff=s opposition to Defendants= pending 

motions for new trial in order to permit the parties to finalize the settlement negotiations. Good cause 

exists for this brief enlargement of time because the parties have an agreement in principle to settle the 

entire case, however, the final terms have yet to be reduced to writing. As soon as the settlement papers 

have been prepared by defense counsel, Plaintiff expects that she will review and sign them promptly. 

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree that the time for filing Plaintiff=s supplemental opposition to 

Defendants= Rule 59 motion may be enlarged from January 4, 2016 to January 28, 2016.

Case 1:12-cv-01835-SAB Document 261 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Dated: January 4, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF 

PAMELA Y. PRICE 

 /s/ Pamela Y. Price 

PAMELA Y. PRICE, Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IRMA B. SANCHEZ

Dated: January 4, 2016 CALIFORNIA 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

 /s/ Matthew T. Besmer 

MATTHEW T. BESMER, Attorney for Defendants 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SYDNEY SMYTH

ORDER

The Court having read and considered the Stipulation of Counsel to modify the briefing schedule 

on Defendants= post trial Rule 59 motion to extend the time for filing of Plaintiff=s supplemental 

opposition to Defendants= motion until January 28, 2016 to allow the parties to finalize the settlement. If 

the settlement is not finalized, the parties must be prepared to file their appropriate responses to the 

outstanding motions as no further extensions will be granted. Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO 

ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2016 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-01835-SAB Document 261 Filed 01/05/16 Page 2 of 2