Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-02517/USCOURTS-azd-2_14-cv-02517-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Wendy D. Sholes, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Apache Junction Police Department, 

Defendant.

No. CV-14-2517-PHX-DKD 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

TO THE HONORABLE SUSAN R. BOLTON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE: 

 On November 24, 2014, the Court entered an Order which directed the Plaintiff to 

file an amended complaint and further advising that she address the deficiencies which 

the Court had identified in that Order (Doc. 5). On December 1, 2014, mail was returned 

undeliverable (Doc. 6). In the Court’s November 24, 2014 Order, the Court warned 

Plaintiff that failure to comply with that order might result in the dismissal of her 

complaint. Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s Order and because 

she has failed to file a notice of change of address in accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the 

Local Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court will recommend to the Presiding District 

Judge of the Phoenix Division that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed. 1

 

1

 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Presiding Phoenix Division 

District Judge in light of the absence of consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. 

Case 2:14-cv-02517-DKD Document 7 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this matter be dismissed for failure to comply with 

the Court’s November 24, 2014 Order and because she has failed to keep the Court 

informed of any change of address. 

 This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth 

Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules 

of Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district court’s judgment. 

The parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this 

recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. See, 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Rules 72, 6(a), 6(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Thereafter, 

the parties have fourteen days within which to file a response to the objections. Failure 

timely to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation may 

result in the acceptance of the Report and Recommendation by the district court without 

further review. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Failure timely to file objections to any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge will 

be considered a waiver of a party’s right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an 

order or judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. See Rule 

72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

 Dated this 23rd day of January, 2015. 

cc: SRB 

Case 2:14-cv-02517-DKD Document 7 Filed 01/23/15 Page 2 of 2