Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01193/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-01193-12/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JEFFREY E. WALKER, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

MOHADJER, Clinical Psychologist, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:13-cv-1193 WBS AC P 

ORDER 

 The Court has considered the request by defendants White, Strayhorn, Sheldon-Russell, 

Cain-Mathis, Demps, Fiallos, and Mohadjer for an extension of time to oppose Plaintiff’s motion 

for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF No. 51) and allegations of retaliation (ECF No. 59) until 

after Plaintiff has had an opportunity to oppose defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma 

pauperis (IFP) status. The court finds good cause to grant the request. 

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 

 1. Defendants shall not be required to provide an opposition until after the court issues a 

ruling on their pending motion to revoke IFP, if a further response is deemed necessary; 

 2. Defendants’ counsel must file notice as soon as counsel is informed that plaintiff’s legal 

materials have been restored to him and he has access to the law library; 

 3. Upon the filing and service of such notice, plaintiff will have thirty days to file his 

Case 2:13-cv-01193-WBS-AC Document 62 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2

opposition to defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status. Plaintiff may, but 

is not required to, file his opposition sooner if he can do so under present circumstances; and 

 4. Plaintiff’s failure to oppose the motion within the time provided will be deemed a 

statement of non-opposition to the motion and result in a recommendation that the motion be 

granted. 

DATED: February 26, 2014 

Case 2:13-cv-01193-WBS-AC Document 62 Filed 02/27/14 Page 2 of 2