Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-04167/USCOURTS-cand-4_11-cv-04167-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 152
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Default of Student Loan

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

 CHRISTIAN,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

No. C-11-04167 DMR

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff has filed a motion to add Defendant’s aliases and spouse’s name and aliases to the

abstract of judgment. [Docket No. 49.] Defendant is appearing in this action without legal

representation. According to the local Court rules, Defendant should have filed any brief in

opposition to Plaintiff’s motion by October 22, 2014. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-3. The court has

received no such opposition. 

On October 29, 2014, the court issued an order to show case regarding Defendant’s failure to

respond to the motion. Docket No. 57. Defendant’s response to the order to show cause was due on

November 10, 2014, but to date Defendant has not filed a response to the order to show cause. 

However, on November 13, 2014, Defendant filed a notice of change of address. 

Accordingly, the court orders as follows: the previous order to show cause (Docket No. 57)

is discharged. Defendant must respond by November 24, 2014 and explain his failure to respond to

Plaintiff’s motion to add Defendant’s aliases and spouse’s name and aliases to the abstract of

Case 4:11-cv-04167-DMR Document 59 Filed 11/13/14 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

judgment. In addition, Defendant shall to simultaneously (1) submit his opposition to Plaintiff’s

motion or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. 

This order to show cause does not indicate that the court will necessarily accept Defendant’s

late submission. If Defendant does not respond by November 24, 2014, Plaintiff’s motion may be

granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 13, 2014

 DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:11-cv-04167-DMR Document 59 Filed 11/13/14 Page 2 of 2