Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00039/USCOURTS-caed-2_07-cv-00039-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHAD CLEVELAND,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-0039 MCE DAD P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, Warden,

Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed March 28, 2007, petitioner was granted thirty days to file a

habeas petition that complies with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and

the Local Rules of Practice. In addition, petitioner was ordered to submit, within thirty days, an

application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner was

cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed. 

The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order, has

not filed a habeas petition, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the

appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

Case 2:07-cv-00039-MCE -DAD Document 5 Filed 05/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 9, 2007.

DAD:lg

clev0039.fpf

Case 2:07-cv-00039-MCE -DAD Document 5 Filed 05/09/07 Page 2 of 2