Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04018/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-04018-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement

---

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

John P. Bovich (SBN 150688) 

Email: jbovich@reedsmith.com 

William Ross Overend (SBN 180209) 

Email: woverend@reedsmith.com 

REED SMITH LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, CA 94111-3922 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 7936 

San Francisco, CA 94120-7936 

Telephone: 415.543.8700 

Facsimile: 415.391.8269 

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 

William H. Manning, pro hac vice

Brad P. Engdahl, pro hac vice

Eric S. Jackson, pro hac vice

Jacob S. Zimmerman, pro hac vice

2800 LaSalle Plaza 

800 LaSalle Avenue 

Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 

Telephone: 612.349.8500 

Facsimile: 512.339.4181 

Attorneys for Plaintiff And Counterclaim 

Defendant 

Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company 

John F. Feldhaus pro hac vice 

Russell J. Barron pro hac vice 

Stephen M. Lobbin (SBN 181195) 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

1530 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125 

Telephone: 650.856.3700 

Facsimile: 650.856.3710 

E-mail: jfeldhaus@foley.com 

 rbarron@foley.com 

 slobbin@foley.com 

Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants 

Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America 

Information Systems, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

INTERGRAPH HARDWARE 

TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, a Nevada 

corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, a Japanese 

corporation, et al., 

 Defendants. 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 1 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 1 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

The Court finds that this action may involve trade secrets and other valuable research, 

development, commercial, financial, and technical proprietary information that is regarded by the 

parties and Intel as confidential. To expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 

resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information 

the parties and Intel are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that only materials the parties and 

Intel are entitled to keep confidential are subject to such treatment, and to ensure that the parties and 

Intel are permitted reasonably necessary uses of such materials in preparation for and in the conduct 

of trial, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and for good cause shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Definitions

a. “Affiliates”: with regard to a Party, any Person (excluding individuals) 

formerly, now, or hereafter controlled by, controlling or under common control with such Party; 

where “control” means the direct or indirect ownership or control (whether through contract or 

otherwise) of more than 50% of the stock or shares entitled to vote for the election of directors in the 

case of corporate entities, and in the case of non-corporate entities, more than 50% of the equity 

interest with the power to direct management policies. 

b. “Designating Party”: a Person that designates information, documents or 

things that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL,” 

“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED.” 

c. “include,” “including,” “including” and other variants thereof shall be deemed 

followed by the phrase “without limitation.” 

d. “Individual Notice”: with respect to an individual, the curriculum vitae of 

such individual along with the following information: (i) business address; (ii) business title; 

(iii) business or profession; (iv) any previous or current relationship (personal or professional) with 

any of the Parties; and (v) a listing of other cases in which the individual has testified (at trial or 

deposition), and all companies for which the individual has consulted or been employed by within 

the past four years. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 2 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 2 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

e. “In-House Litigation Counsel”: attorneys employed by a Receiving Party in 

the capacity of a litigation attorney whose primary responsibility is to manage, supervise or oversee 

litigation as part of his or her responsibilities for such Party and who does not engage in competitive 

decision-making (and their support staff such as paralegals, administrative assistants and 

secretaries), and who shall not from the date of entry of this Protective Order through a period of one 

(1) year following the conclusion of this action, whichever occurs later, be engaged in: (a) the 

review, advice on or approval of pricing, sales or marketing programs, (b) the review, advice on or 

approval of any aspect of product design or manufacture, (c) the review or negotiation of any 

contract with a Producing Party, or (d) the licensing of software, hardware, technology, or patent(s) 

related to the Technological Field (with the exception that the foregoing (d) shall not apply to the 

extent a litigation attorney is involved in the settlement of litigation). In the case of Toshiba, an 

individual employed by the Intellectual Property Department of Toshiba who is not a licensed 

attorney in the United States but who otherwise meets the requirements of the foregoing sentence 

shall be deemed an In-House Litigation Counsel for the purposes of this Protective Order, subject to 

the restrictions in Section 9(g) regarding transmitting and transporting Protected Material outside the 

United States. 

f. “Intel Protected Materials”: Material produced by Intel, including trade 

secrets and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, and technical proprietary 

information that is regarded by Intel as confidential, including Material which may or may not have 

been produced in the Prior Litigation and/or may or may not be designated “CONFIDENTIAL,” 

“ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED”. 

g. “Involved In Patent Prosecution:” participation in drafting, reviewing or 

approving any language that appears in any patent or industrial design application or a patent or 

industrial design in re-examination, re-issue or other proceedings, or preparation of replies to Office 

Actions, submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office or any foreign agency 

responsible for issuing patents. 

h. “Material”: all information, documents and things produced, served or 

otherwise provided in this action by the Parties. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 3 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 3 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

i. “Outside Consultant”: an individual with specialized knowledge or 

experience in a matter pertinent to this action who has been retained by a Party or Outside Counsel 

to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action and who is not a current or anticipated 

employee of a Party, or of a competitor of any other Party, or a consultant involved in product and/or 

process development for a competitor of any other Party. 

j. “Outside Counsel”: Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi and Reed Smith LLP for 

Intergraph, Foley & Lardner for Toshiba, and in particular such attorneys of such counsel to whom it 

is reasonably necessary to disclose any particular Protected Material for the Toshiba Matter, 

including support staff employed by the attorneys, such as paralegals, legal translators, legal 

secretaries, and legal clerks. 

k. “Parties”: the parties to this Protective Order, consisting of (a) the parties to 

this action (namely, Intergraph Hardware Technologies Co. (“Intergraph”); Toshiba Corporation, 

Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc., Toshiba 

America Business Solutions, Inc., Toshiba TEC America Retail Information Systems, Inc. (the 

foregoing collectively, “Toshiba”) on behalf of themselves and their Representatives as authorized 

hereunder, and (b) Intel Corporation (“Intel”). 

l. “Person”: an individual, trust, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited 

liability company, association, unincorporated organization or other legal or governmental entity. 

m. “Prior Litigation”: lawsuits brought by Intergraph against (i) Intel in 

Intergraph Hardware Technologies, Co. v. Intel Corp., Civil Action No. 97-CV-3023 (N.D. Ala.) 

(“Alabama Litigation”); (ii) Intel in Intergraph Corporation v. Intel Corporation, Civil Action No. 

2:01CV160 (E.D. Tex.) (“Texas Litigation”); and (iii) Intel-affiliated parties in Intergraph Hardware 

Technologies, Co. v. Dell, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2-02CV-312 (E.D. Tex., Marshall Division) 

(“Dell Litigation”). 

n. “Producing Party”: a Person that produces Material in this action. 

o. “Professional Vendors”: Persons that provide litigation support services (e.g., 

photocopying; videotaping; translating; designing and preparing exhibits or demonstrations; 

organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors, 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 4 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 4 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

including (1) any professional jury or trial consultant retained in connection with this action and 

mock jurors retained by such a consultant to assist them in their work and (2) independent legal 

translators and independent shorthand reporters retained to translate or record and transcribe 

testimony in connection with this action; provided, however, that this definition does not include 

individuals who fall within the definition of Outside Counsel or Outside Consultant. 

p. “Protected Material”: (i) Intel Protected Material and (ii) other Material that 

is designated “CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “OUTSIDE COUNSEL 

RESTRICTED,” defined as follows: 

i. “CONFIDENTIAL” Protected Material: Material the Designating 

Party believes in good faith is not generally known to others, and which the Designating Party (i) 

would not normally reveal to third parties except in confidence or has undertaken with others to 

maintain in confidence, or (ii) believes in good faith is protected by a right to privacy under federal 

or state law or any other applicable privilege or right related to confidentiality or privacy. 

“CONFIDENTIAL” Protected Material includes all Intel Protected Material designated as 

“CONFIDENTIAL” in the Texas Litigation and the Dell Litigation. Protected Material may be 

designated as CONFIDENTIAL for purposes of this Protective Order if the Producing Party in good 

faith considers it to constitute or to contain trade secrets or other confidential research, development, 

or commercial information. CONFIDENTIAL Protected Material shall include all information, 

documents, and things referring or relating to the foregoing, including but not limited to copies, 

summaries, notes, memoranda, and abstracts of the foregoing, which shall be designated as such by 

the Party creating such information, documents or things. 

ii. “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Protected Material: Material the 

Designating Party believes in good faith is not generally known to others and has significant 

competitive value such that unrestricted disclosure to others would create a substantial risk of serious 

injury, and which the Designating Party (1) would not normally reveal to third parties except in 

confidence or has undertaken with others to maintain in confidence, or (2) believes in good faith is 

significantly sensitive and protected by a right to privacy under federal or state law or any other 

applicable privilege or right related to confidentiality or privacy. “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 5 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 5 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Protected Material includes all Intel Protected Materials designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” in the 

Alabama Litigation or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “ATTORNEYS’ 

EYES ONLY” in the Dell Litigation. This designation is reserved for Protected Material that 

constitutes proprietary financial, technical or commercially sensitive competitive information that 

the Producing Party maintains as highly confidential in its business, including information obtained 

from some other Person pursuant to a current Nondisclosure Agreement (“NDA”), information 

relating to future products, strategic plans, MAS, RTL, non-public financial data, documents that 

would reveal trade secrets, licensing documents and licensing communications, and settlement 

agreements or settlement communications, the disclosure of which is likely to cause harm to the 

competitive position of the Producing Party. Any document designated as “ATTORNEYS’ EYES 

ONLY” Protected Material is automatically designated as subject to the PROSECUTION BAR in 

Section 9(e). ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Protected Material shall include all information, 

documents, and things referring or relating to the foregoing, including but not limited to copies, 

summaries, notes, memoranda, and abstracts of the foregoing, which shall be designated as such by 

the Party creating such information, documents or things. 

iii. “OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED” Protected Material. 

Protected Material meeting the requirements for ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY Protected Material, as 

set forth in subsection (ii) above, which the Producing Party reasonably believes contains such 

highly sensitive information that its disclosure to any employees of a Receiving Party, including InHouse Litigation Counsel, would present a substantial risk of harm to the competitive position of the 

Producing Party. “OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED” Protected Material includes all Intel 

Protected Material designated as “RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES 

ONLY” in the Dell Litigation. 

q. “Public Domain” as used with regard to information means information that: 

i. is in the public domain at the time it is produced; or 

ii. becomes part of the public domain as a result of publication not 

involving a violation of this Protective Order or any other court order or law; or 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 6 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 6 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

iii. a Receiving Party can show was in its rightful and lawful possession 

without restriction as to disclosure, at the time it was produced (other than any Protected Materials 

previously provided to any Receiving Party under any non-disclosure or similar agreement or 

protective order); or 

iv. a Receiving Party lawfully received from a Third Party without 

restriction as to disclosure, provided such Third Party has the right to make the disclosure to such 

Receiving Party. 

r. “Receiving Party”: Toshiba and/or Intergraph receiving any Material 

hereunder. 

s. “Representatives”: officers, directors, employees, consultants, contractors, 

retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff), including Outside Counsel, 

Professional Vendors, and Outside Consultants. 

t. “Technological Field”: (a) with regard to In-House Litigation Counsel of 

Toshiba, structure, operation and manufacture of microprocessors and microprocessor chipsets, 

microprocessor and memory integrated circuits, memory controllers, peripheral controllers, cache 

memory, or buses, and (b) with regard to all other Persons authorized to access Protected Material 

hereunder, microprocessors, microprocessor chipsets, microprocessor and memory integrated 

circuits, memory controllers, peripheral controllers, computer systems, cache memory, buses, or 

other computer products. 

2. Procedure for Designating Materials

a. Intel Protected Material

The Parties acknowledge that Intel may produce Intel Protected Material that was produced 

pursuant to one or more protective orders in the Prior Litigation. To the extent any Intel Protected 

Material bears one or more designations of confidentiality from the Prior Litigation, or if any Intel 

Protected Material is provided twice with different designations, the Parties agree that the most 

restrictive designation from the Prior Litigation shall apply and that Intel or any other Party shall not 

be required to re-stamp or re-designate Intel Protected Material produced in Prior Litigation. To the 

extent that any Intel Protected Material has no designation, or some designation other than 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 7 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 7 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED, the 

Receiving Parties agree (1) that Intel or any other Party shall not be required to re-stamp or redesignate the Intel Protected Material, and (2) to treat such material as OUTSIDE COUNSEL 

RESTRICTED and notify Intel thereof in writing. Upon receipt of notice from another Party, Intel 

will notify the Receiving Parties of the proper designation for such material within thirty (30) days. 

Notwithstanding anything in this Protective Order to the contrary or any contrary designation 

on any Intel Protected Material, all agreements granting licenses or other rights to intellectual 

property or technology included in the Intel Protected Materials, other than such agreements entered 

into between Intel and Intergraph, shall be deemed and treated by the Parties as OUTSIDE 

COUNSEL RESTRICTED. Intel shall not be required to re-stamp or re-designate such agreements. 

Intergraph agrees not to challenge the designations by Intel of any Intel Protected Material, 

and agrees that it does not have any right under Section 6 to challenge any designations of Intel. 

Toshiba agrees not to challenge the reasonable designations by Intel of any Protected Material. 

A Receiving Party reasonably believing any Intel Protected Material is in the Public Domain 

may so notify Intel. Intel shall respond to such notice within 20 business days, and may, if 

appropriate, instruct the Receiving Parties that such Intel Protected Material is no longer subject to 

the protections of this Protective Order. 

b. Documents and Other Tangible Materials

The designation of Material (including any Material produced by Intel in the litigation, other 

than Intel Protected Material that is subject to the provisions set forth in Section 2(a) above) in the 

form of documents, discovery responses, or other tangible materials, other than depositions or other 

pre-trial testimony, shall be made by the Designating Party by conspicuously affixing the legend 

“CONFIDENTIAL,” “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED” 

on each page containing Material to which the designation applies (or in the case of computer 

medium on the medium and its label and/or cover). To the extent practical, the legend shall be 

placed near the Bates number identifying the Material. If any Material has more than one 

designation, the more restrictive or higher confidential designation applies. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 8 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 8 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

c. Nontangible Materials

All Protected Material that is not reduced to documentary, tangible, or physical form or that 

can not be conveniently designated in the manner set forth above shall be designated by the 

Designating Party by informing the Receiving Party in writing. 

d. Deposition Testimony and Transcripts

Any Party may designate as Protected Material information that is disclosed at a deposition 

in this action by indicating on the record at the deposition that the testimony is CONFIDENTIAL, 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED and is subject to the 

provisions of this Protective Order. Any Party may also designate information as Protected Material 

by notifying the court reporter and all of the Parties, in writing and within thirty days after receipt of 

the deposition transcript, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that should be treated 

thereafter as CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or OUTSIDE COUNSEL 

RESTRICTED. Each Party shall attach a copy of such written notice or notices to the face of the 

transcript and each copy thereof in his/her possession, custody, or control. All deposition transcripts 

shall be treated as OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED for at least a period of thirty days after 

receipt of the transcript. 

3. Inadvertent Production

a. No Waiver of Privilege

Inspection or production of documents (including physical objects) shall not constitute a 

waiver of the attorney-client privilege or work product immunity or any other applicable privilege or 

immunity from discovery if, as soon as reasonably possible after the Producing Party becomes aware 

of any inadvertent or unintentional disclosure, the Producing Party designates any such documents as 

within the attorney-client privilege or work product immunity or any other applicable privilege or 

immunity and requests return of such documents to the Producing Party. Upon request by the 

Producing Party, the Receiving Parties shall immediately return all copies of such inadvertently 

produced document(s). Nothing herein shall prevent the Receiving Party from challenging the 

propriety of the attorney-client privilege or work product immunity or other applicable privilege or 

immunity designation by submitting a written challenge to the Court. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 9 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 9 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

4. Information Not Covered By This Order

No information shall be deemed Protected Material (other than Intel Protected Material 

which is subject to Section 2(a)) if it is information that is in the Public Domain. 

5. Third Party Designations

Intel and Third Parties who produce in this action any documents, information, things, 

evidence, or other materials included in the Protected Material may avail themselves of the 

provisions of this Protective Order, and such Protected Material produced by Intel and Third Parties 

shall be treated by the Parties to this action in conformance with this Protective Order. Intel’s or a 

Third Party’s use of this Protective Order for that party’s confidential information does not entitle 

Intel or that Third Party to have access to Protected Material produced by any non-Intel Party in this 

case. 

6. Challenges to Designations

Toshiba and Intergraph and any Third Party producing documents pursuant to this Protective 

Order shall use reasonable care when designating Protected Material. Nothing in this Protective 

Order shall prevent a Receiving Party from contending that any Protected Material (other than 

reasonably designated Intel Protected Material) has been improperly designated hereunder. If any 

Receiving Party disagrees with the Producing Party’s designation of any Protected Material (other 

than reasonably designated Intel Protected Material), then the applicable Parties initially shall try to 

resolve the dispute on an informal basis. If such Parties are unable to resolve such a dispute 

informally, the Receiving Party disagreeing with the designation may apply to the Court for relief. 

The Producing Party will bear the burden of proving confidentiality upon any such application. Any 

Protected Material shall be treated as designated by the Producing Party and subject to the protection 

of this Protective Order unless and until the Court determines otherwise. No Party shall be obligated 

to challenge the propriety of a designation, and a failure to do so shall not constitute, an admission 

that any Material is appropriately designated, nor preclude a later challenge to the propriety of such 

designation. 

7. Inspection of Materials

Any Material made available for inspection by counsel for the Receiving Party shall initially 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 10 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 10 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

be considered to be OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED Protected Material and shall be subject to 

this Protective Order even though no formal confidentiality designation has yet been made. 

Thereafter, the Producing Party shall have a reasonable time to review and designate the inspected 

Protected Material as CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or OUTSIDE COUNSEL 

RESTRICTED prior to furnishing copies to such Receiving Party. 

8. Obligation to Maintain Confidentiality; General Limitations on Disclosure and Use of 

Protected Material

a. Obligation to Maintain Confidentiality

In order to ensure that the confidential nature of the Protected Material is maintained, the 

Receiving Parties agree to not disclose and to maintain in strict confidence all Protected Material, 

and shall keep it in a high security, locked area and in a highly secure manner at all times. Each 

Receiving Party shall use a high standard of care with regard to the storage, custody, and use of the 

Protected Material but in all events no less than the standard of care that such Receiving Party 

applies to its own confidential information. 

b. Use for Litigation Preparation Solely – No Business Use

PROTECTED MATERIAL AND THE SUBSTANCE AND CONTENT THEREOF, 

INCLUDING ANY NOTES, MEMORANDA, SUMMARIES, OR OTHER SIMILAR 

DOCUMENTS RELATING THERETO, SHALL BE USED BY A RECEIVING PARTY SOLELY 

FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS LITIGATION AND NOT FOR ANY BUSINESS PURPOSE. If 

any Protected Material is disclosed or comes into the possession of any Person other than in the 

manner authorized by this Protective Order, any Party having knowledge of the disclosure must 

immediately inform the Designating Party of all pertinent facts relating to such disclosure and shall 

make reasonable efforts to retrieve such Protected Material and to prevent further disclosure. 

c. Limitation on Number of Recipients

Access to Protected Material shall be restricted to the specific number of authorized InHouse Litigation Counsel and employees, officers, and/or directors of a Receiving Party as set forth 

in Section 9. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 11 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 11 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

d. Outside Consultants

Should a Receiving Party find it necessary for maintaining, defending, or evaluating the 

present action to disclose Protected Material to an Outside Consultant, such Receiving Party shall 

first give written notice to, and obtain the consent of, the Producing Party. For the avoidance of 

doubt, such written notice shall only be provided to the Producing Party and not the other Receiving 

Party. As part of the written notice to the Producing Party, the Receiving Party seeking to disclose 

Protected Material to an Outside Consultant shall provide the Individual Notice for such Outside 

Consultant. If the Producing Party provides such consent, such Receiving Party shall obtain from 

such Outside Consultant a written Confidentiality Agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 

A. Such written agreement shall be retained by counsel for such Receiving Party, and must be 

disclosed to the Producing Party within ten (10) calendar days of signing. 

e. Confidentiality Agreements

No Protected Material shall be disclosed to In-House Litigation Counsel, an Outside 

Consultant, Professional Vendor, or any employee, officer, or director of a Receiving Party, or any 

other individual not permitted access under this Protective Order until the individual has first signed 

the Confidentiality Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A, thereby declaring that he or she has read 

and understands this Protective Order and agrees to be bound by its terms. If such individual 

declines to sign a Confidentiality Agreement, the Parties, by their attorneys, shall jointly seek a 

protective order from the Court prohibiting such individual from disclosing such Protected Material. 

9. Access to Protected Material

a. Access to CONFIDENTIAL Protected Material

As set forth more fully in Section 9(g), below, no Protected Material may be transmitted 

outside the United States. 

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 

Receiving Party may disclose CONFIDENTIAL Protected Material only to the following (and those 

identified in Section 9(l) below regarding use of Protected Material at depositions), subject to 

Section 8: 

i. The Court and its personnel; 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 12 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 12 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

ii. Outside Counsel and Professional Vendors for each Receiving Party 

whose functions require access to CONFIDENTIAL Protected Material. 

iii. Two (2) In-House Litigation Counsel for each Receiving Party whose 

functions require access to CONFIDENTIAL Protected Material. 

iv. Outside Consultants with whom Outside Counsel deem it necessary to 

consult concerning technical, financial, or other aspects of this case to prepare for trial. 

v. Two (2) employees, officers, and/or directors of a Receiving Party who 

have responsibility for maintaining, defending, or evaluating this litigation (and supporting 

personnel). This paragraph does not permit any Protected Material subject to the Prosecution Bar of 

Section 9(e) below to be shown to any employee, officer, or director. 

b. Access to ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Protected Material

As set forth more fully in Section 9(g), below, no Protected Material may be transmitted 

outside the United States. 

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 

Receiving Party may disclose ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Protected Material only to the following 

(and those identified in Section 9(l) below regarding use of Protected Material at depositions), 

subject to Section 8: 

i. The Court and its personnel. 

ii. Outside Counsel and Professional Vendors for each Receiving Party 

whose functions require access to ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Protected Material. 

iii. Two (2) In-House Litigation Counsel for each Receiving Party whose 

functions require access to ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Protected Material. 

iv. Outside Consultants with whom counsel deem it necessary to consult 

concerning technical, financial, or other aspects of this case to prepare for trial. 

c. Access to OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED Protected Material. 

As set forth more fully in Section 9(g), below, no Protected Material may be transmitted 

outside the United States. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 13 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 13 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 

Receiving Party may disclose OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED Protected Material only to the 

following (and those identified in Section 9(l) below regarding use of Protected Material at 

depositions), subject to Section 8: 

i. The Court and its personnel. 

ii. Outside Counsel and Professional Vendors for each Receiving Party 

whose functions require access to OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED Protected Materials. If the 

receiving Outside Counsel reasonably needs to disclose such Protected Material to In-House 

Litigation Counsel to obtain informed instructions on the conduct of this action, such Receiving 

Party will first obtain the prior written consent of the Producing Party, who will make reasonable 

efforts to accommodate such Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected Material. If the 

applicable Parties are unable to come to an agreement as to the treatment of any such Protected 

Material (other than the Protected Material of Intel), the Receiving Party may apply to the Court for 

relief. 

iii. Outside Consultants with whom Outside Counsel deem it necessary to 

consult concerning technical, financial, or other aspects of this case to prepare for trial. 

d. Additional Restrictions on Access to RTL, iHDL, or Similar Code

i. Access to the machine-readable version of RTL, iHDL, or similarly 

sensitive code along with micro-architecture specifications and other specifications that contain code 

that may be compiled shall be provided only under OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED 

protection, subject to the Prosecution Bar in Section 9(e), and only on “stand-alone” computers (i.e., 

not connected to, without limitation, a network, the Internet, wireless device, or peripheral device) at 

secure locations at the offices of the Intel’s counsel, Weil Gotshal & Manges, in Redwood City, 

California (or other suitable office space approved by Intel located in the Northern District of 

California). Outside Counsel for Toshiba and Intergraph will be provided access in separate rooms. 

Intel will produce RTL in computer-searchable format, but need not produce executable code absent 

further agreement of the Parties or by court order. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 14 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 14 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

ii. Intel will allow printing of paper copies of limited portions of (but not 

all) such code and specifications reasonably necessary for preparation of expert reports or court 

filings (collectively with all images, copies and transmissions authorized hereunder, “Code 

Printouts”) at the time of inspection by the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, which the Receiving 

Party’s Outside Counsel may take when completing an inspection. The Receiving Party’s Outside 

Counsel must keep the Code Printouts (including all images and copies thereof) in a locked secured 

container or restricted-access, secured location at all times. 

iii. Intel may maintain a log of which pages of code have been printed 

and/or keep copies of such pages. If Intel believes that the amount and nature of Code Printouts is 

unreasonable, Intel may either (i) refuse to allow the printing and initiate an expedited meet and 

confer conference within five (5) business days, to be followed by a hearing with the Court as soon 

as practicable, or (ii) allow the printing on the condition that the Receiving Party agree not to make 

any copies, images or transmissions of the disputed Code Printouts and to maintain them in a locked 

and secure cabinet until the matter is resolved by agreement of the Parties or order of the Court. If 

the applicable Parties are unable to agree on a resolution during the meet and confer conference, 

Intel may move the Court for an order that requires the Receiving Parties to return all or a portion of 

the copies, images and transmissions, and/or prevents the Receiving Parties from printing all or a 

portion of said Code Printouts. 

iv. Intel will provide to Outside Counsel for Intergraph and Toshiba, to 

keep for the duration of this litigation and pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order and for 

review in their offices, such Bates-numbered pages of Code Printouts that were referenced in 

Intergraph’s Final Infringement Contentions and the associated narratives in the Dell Litigation and 

are set forth on Exhibit B. All such pages shall be deemed Code Printouts and subject to the 

applicable restrictions hereunder. 

v. Code Printouts may not be electronically or otherwise digitally copied 

or transmitted, except as expressly hereinafter provided. The Receiving Party may not create 

electronic, optical or other copies, images or transmissions of the Code Printouts, except the 

Receiving Party may create (i) physical photocopies and (ii) such other copies or images only if 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 15 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 15 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

reasonably necessary to accomplish any filing with the Court or to serve any pleadings or other 

papers on any other Party (including expert reports) and only up to five (5) pages in length of the 

Code Printouts per pleading or paper. If copies or images of Code Printouts are electronically or 

otherwise digitally transmitted in accordance with the foregoing, such copies or images shall be 

encrypted, and/or transmitted over a secure network. Code Printouts filed with the Court (in any 

form) must be filed under seal. Code Printouts that are marked as deposition exhibits shall not be 

provided to the Court Reporter or attached to deposition transcripts; rather, the deposition record will 

identify the exhibit by its production numbers. Any Party filing Code Printouts with the Court must, 

two (2) business days prior to such filing, give notice to Intel and provide Intel an opportunity to 

object to such filing. Images or copies of Code Printouts shall not be included in correspondence 

between the Parties (references to production numbers shall be used instead), and shall be omitted 

from pleadings and other papers whenever possible. Professional Vendors shall not have access of 

any kind under any circumstances to any Code Printouts (including any images, copies, or 

transmissions thereof). 

vi. Code Printouts shall include Bates numbers and OUTSIDE 

COUNSEL RESTRICTED labels when printed, copied, imaged or otherwise transmitted. The 

Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel shall maintain a complete log of all Bates-numbered pages of 

Code Printouts (including all images, copies or transmissions thereof), including the names of each 

individual granted access thereto as authorized hereunder, and the locations where Code Printouts 

are stored. The Receiving Party shall produce this log (i) at the time its first expert reports are 

delivered or (ii) in the case of any Intel Protected Material, upon request by Intel. For security 

purposes, this log must be produced to Intel regardless of any other stipulation limiting expert 

discovery. Further, the log will be supplemented with each new expert report, and 10 days after 

trial. 

e. Prosecution Bar

Protected Material is automatically designated as subject to a Prosecution Bar. Any 

individual (including any In-House Litigation Counsel, Outside Counsel, Professional Vendor or 

Outside Consultant) who has access to any Protected Material shall not be Involved In Patent 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 16 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 16 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Prosecution by or on behalf of any Receiving Party relating to the Technological Field from the time 

of receipt of such Protected Material through and including one year following the entry of a final, 

nonappealable judgment or order or the complete settlement of all claims against all parties in this 

action. 

f. Access by Professional Vendors

Despite the access restrictions set forth in Sections 9(a) through (e), but otherwise subject to 

the requirements set forth in this Protective Order, Protected Material, and such copies as are 

reasonably necessary for maintaining, defending, or evaluating this litigation, may be furnished and 

disclosed to Professional Vendors as defined in Section 1(l). Before disclosing any Protected 

Material to any Person described in this paragraph, counsel for the applicable Receiving Party will 

first give written notice to, and obtain the consent of, the Producing Party. For the avoidance of 

doubt, such written notice shall only be provided to the Producing Party and not the other Receiving 

Party. As part of the written notice to the Producing Party, the Receiving Party seeking to disclose 

Protected Material to a Professional Vendor will provide the identity of such Professional Vendor 

and locations where services will be provided by such Professional Vendor. If the Producing Party 

provides such consent, such Receiving Party will obtain from such Professional Vendor, and each of 

its personnel having access to any Protected Material, a written Confidentiality Agreement, in the 

form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Such written agreement shall be retained by counsel for such 

Receiving Party. 

Professional Vendors shall not have access of any kind under any circumstances to any Code 

Printouts (including any images, copies, or transmissions thereof). 

g. Transmittal of Protected Material

No Protected Material shall be transmitted or transported outside the United States, or 

communicated to any recipient who is located outside of the United States, for any purpose, without 

the express written permission of the Producing Party. Intel hereby grants Toshiba’s Outside 

Counsel permission to discuss any Intel Protected Material on the telephone with such Toshiba InHouse Litigation Counsel in Japan authorized to receive such Intel Protected Material hereunder. 

The Producing Party will respond to a request for such permission within twenty (20) business days 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 17 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 17 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

and will not unreasonably withhold such permission. This prohibition shall extend, without 

limitation, to all authorized communications between Representatives of any Receiving Party. 

Nothing in this Protective Order shall prohibit the transmission or communication of 

Protected Material within the United States between or among qualified recipients authorized 

hereunder: (i) by hand delivery; (ii) in sealed envelopes or containers via the mails or an established 

overnight, freight, delivery, or messenger service; or (iii) subject to Section 9(h) below, 

CONFIDENTIAL Protected Material (but not ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or OUTSIDE 

COUNSEL RESTRICTED Protected Material) may be transmitted by telephone, facsimile, or other 

electronic transmission system; (iv) a Receiving Party may discuss ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY 

and OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED Protected Material with any Party authorized hereunder 

to receive such Protected Material by telephone; or (v) subject to Section 9(d), any Outside Counsel 

may make ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or OUTSIDE COUNSEL RESTRICTED Protected 

Material accessible to other attorneys within their firm or their Outside Consultants as set forth in 

Section 9(h). In all cases, such transmission or communication shall only be conducted where and 

when, under the circumstances, there is no reasonable likelihood that the transmission will be 

intercepted or misused by any person who is not a qualified recipient. 

The Receiving Parties may transmit or communicate the Protected Material within the United 

States as necessary to comply with the electronic filing requirements imposed by the U.S. District 

Court for the Northern District of California in the United States so long as such transmission is in 

accordance with the terms and conditions of this Protective Order. 

h. Internet Connection Accessibility

The Parties agree that Protected Materials shall not be accessible over an Internet connection, 

except that each Outside Counsel may maintain a document database available via a secure private 

network but only if the database is hosted on a secure computer located on the premises of the 

Outside Counsel and maintained under the exclusive control of the Outside Counsel. Such a 

document database shall be made accessible only to Outside Counsel and its employees 

administering the database as well as Outside Consultants physically located on the premises of the 

Outside Counsel. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 18 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 18 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

i. Procedure for Objections to Outside Consultant Access

With respect to any Notice provided under Sections 8(d) above with respect to access by 

Outside Consultants to Protected Material, the Producing Party receiving notice shall have fifteen 

(15) calendar days after notice is given (plus three (3) calendar days if notice is given other than by 

hand delivery, email, or facsimile transmission) to object in writing. No Protected Material shall be 

disclosed until after the expiration of the foregoing notice period, provided no objection is received. 

If an objection is made, the parties shall, within fifteen (15) days from the date of the mailing of 

notice of objection, confer and attempt to resolve the dispute. If the parties cannot resolve the 

dispute, or if the conference does not take place, then, within fifteen (15) days from the date of the 

conference or within thirty (30) days from the date of the mailing of notice of objection, the 

objecting party may move the Court for an order that access to Protected Material be denied to the 

designated person, or other appropriate relief. These time periods are not to restrict either party from 

moving for a court order earlier if the circumstances so require. Unless and until the Court 

determines otherwise, no disclosure of any such Protected Material shall be made by the Receiving 

Party to any Outside Consultant with respect to whom an objection has been made. 

j. Exceptions to Limitations on Disclosure

Nothing herein shall prevent disclosure of Protected Material: (i) by the Producing Party to 

anyone else; (ii) by the Receiving Party to an officer or employee of the Producing Party; (iii) by a 

Receiving Party to any Person, whether or not affiliated with the Producing Party at the time of 

disclosure, who either authored the Protected Material, in whole or in part, or who has independently 

received the Protected Material other than through a means constituting a breach of this Protective 

Order; or (iv) to any person who is reasonably identified as previously having had access to the 

Protected Material, which identification is made by the sworn testimony of another or 

unambiguously appears on the face of a document, and other than through a means constituting 

breach of this Protective Order; provided, no such disclosure shall occur unless such person has 

signed the Confidentiality Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A, thereby declaring that he or she 

has read and understands this Agreement and agrees to be bound by its terms. Such written 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 19 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 19 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

agreement shall be retained by counsel for such disclosing Receiving Party and must be disclosed to 

Intel within ten (10) calendar days of signing. 

k. Filing Under Seal

All transcripts of depositions, exhibits, answers to interrogatories, pleadings, briefs, and other 

documents or material submitted to the Court that contain or disclose Protected Material, shall be 

filed in sealed envelopes or other appropriate sealed containers on which shall be endorsed the title 

of this matter, an indication of the nature of the contents of such sealed envelope or other container, 

the words: “CONFIDENTIAL—FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” 

and a statement substantially in the following form: “This envelope contains confidential 

information filed in this case by (name of Party) and is not to be opened nor the contents thereof 

displayed or revealed except by order of the Court presiding over this matter.” In addition, the first 

page of any documents filed under seal shall include the conspicuous legend: “CONFIDENTIAL—

FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” 

If any person fails to file Protected Material under seal, the Producing Party or any Party 

claiming confidentiality may request that the Court place the filing under seal. 

l. Use at Depositions

i. Except as otherwise ordered by the Court, any deposition or trial 

witness may be examined and may testify concerning all Protected Material of which such person 

has prior knowledge. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing: 

1. A present director, officer, and/or employee of a Producing 

Party may be examined and may testify concerning all Protected Material that has been produced by 

that Party. 

2. A former director, officer, and/or employee of a Producing 

Party may be interviewed, examined, and may testify concerning all Protected Material of which 

such person has prior knowledge, including any such Protected Material that refers to matters of 

which the witness has personal knowledge, which has been produced by that Party, and which 

pertains to the time period or periods of such witness’s employment or service. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 20 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 20 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

3. Third Parties may be examined or testify concerning any 

Protected Material of a Producing Party that appears on its face or from other documents or 

testimony to have been received from, or communicated to, the Third Party as a result of any contact 

or relationship with the Producing Party, or a representative of such Producing Party. Any person 

other than the witness, his or her counsel, and any person qualified to receive Protected Material 

under this Protective Order shall be excluded from the portion of the examination concerning such 

information, absent the consent of the Producing Party. If the witness is represented by an attorney 

who is not qualified under this Protective Order to receive Protected Material, then prior to the 

examination, the attorney shall provide a signed Confidentiality Agreement as provided in Section 

8(c). 

ii. In addition to the restrictions on the uses of all types of Protected 

Material set forth in this Protective Order, the following shall apply to Protected Material used at a 

deposition: 

1. A witness who previously had access to Protected Material, but 

who is not under a present nondisclosure agreement with the Producing Party that applies to the 

document, may be shown the document if (1) a copy of this Protective Order is attached to any 

subpoena, notice, or request served on the witness for the deposition, and (2) the witness is advised 

on the deposition record of the existence of the Protective Order and its requirement that the parties 

keep confidential any questions, testimony, or documents that are designated Protected Material. 

2. Witnesses may not copy, take notes on, or retain copies of any 

Protected Material used or reviewed at a deposition. A witness may not take out of the deposition 

room any exhibit that is marked CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or OUTSIDE 

COUNSEL RESTRICTED. The Producing Party of any Protected Material used at a deposition 

may also require that the transcript and exhibits not be copied by the witness or his or her counsel, 

that no notes be made of the transcript or the exhibits, and that the transcript and exhibits may only 

be reviewed by the witness in the offices of one of the Outside Counsel representing a Party in this 

case (or another firm acting for one of the Outside Counsel under the supervision of one of the 

attorneys bound by the terms of the Protective Order). 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 21 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 21 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

m. Reservation of Rights

If during the course of this litigation Toshiba should determine that any of the restrictions 

placed on access to Protected Material are unduly restrictive, Toshiba may seek leave of court to 

have such restrictions modified 

10. Additional Protections

The Parties may, by stipulation, provide for exceptions to this Protective Order. Nothing in 

this Protective Order shall be deemed to preclude any Party from seeking and obtaining, on an 

appropriate showing, additional protection with respect to the confidentiality of Protected Material 

or relief from this Protective Order with respect to particular Protected Material. 

11. Return of Documents

a. General Obligation to Return or Destroy Protected Material

Within sixty (60) calendar days after entry of a final, nonappealable judgment or order, or the 

complete settlement of all claims asserted against all parties in this action, each Party shall: (i) at its 

option, either destroy or return to the Producing Party all Protected Material received from such 

Producing Party; and (ii) shall destroy in whatever form stored or reproduced, all other physical 

objects and documents (including but not limited to correspondence, memoranda, notes, and other 

work product materials) that contain or refer to Protected Material; provided, however, that Outside 

Counsel for the Receiving Parties shall be entitled to maintain for its files copies of all pleadings, 

motions, and trial briefs (including all supporting and opposing papers and exhibits thereto), written 

discovery requests and responses (and exhibits thereto), deposition transcripts (and exhibits thereto), 

trial transcripts, and exhibits offered or introduced into evidence at trial. 

b. Obligation to Retrieve Protected Materials Disclosed to Others

Each Receiving Party’s obligation to return or destroy Protected Material received from a 

Producing Party extends to Protected Material the Receiving Party discloses to others pursuant to 

this Protective Order. Within sixty (60) calendar days after entry of a final, nonappealable judgment 

or order, or the complete settlement of all claims asserted against all parties in this action, each 

Receiving Party shall inform any Producing Party in writing of: (i) any Protected Material (and any 

documentary materials containing matter derived from Protected Material) that, to the Party’s 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 22 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 22 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

knowledge, has not been returned and/or destroyed in the manner required by this Protective Order; 

and (ii) the identity of any Person who has failed to return and/or destroy such Protected Material or 

derivative material. 

12. Injunctive Relief

The Parties acknowledge that any breach of this Protective Order may result in immediate 

and irreparable injury for which there is no adequate remedy at law. If anyone (Party or Third Party) 

violates or threatens to violate the terms of this Protective Order, the Parties agree that the aggrieved 

Party may immediately apply to obtain injunctive relief against any such violation or threatened 

violation, and if the aggrieved Party does so, any respondent who is subject to the provisions of this 

Protective Order may not employ as a defense that the aggrieved Party possesses an adequate 

remedy at law. 

13. Survival of Order

The terms of this Protective Order shall survive the final termination of this action. This 

Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of enforcing this Protective Order. 

The parties agree that any Order of Dismissal of this action as to any or all Parties shall include a 

specific provision that the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Protective Order 

following dismissal. Each Party hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Court for that 

purpose. 

14. Treatment Prior to Entry of Order

Each Party agrees to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order as of the date it executed 

the Order below, even if prior to entry of the Order by the Court. 

15. Protected Material Subpoenaed or Ordered Produced in Other Litigation

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or a court order that would compel disclosure 

of any Protected Material, such Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by 

fax) promptly and in no event more than ten (10) calendar days after receiving the subpoena or 

order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or order. Such Receiving Party also 

must immediately inform in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue that some or 

all the material covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 23 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 23 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

such Receiving Party must deliver a copy of this Protective Order promptly to the party in the other 

action that caused the subpoena or order to issue. The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert 

the interested parties to the existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Producing Party in 

this case an opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the 

subpoena or order issued. The Producing Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking 

protection in that court of its Protected Material. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as 

authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from 

another court. 

DATED: December 29, 2006. 

REED SMITH LLP

By /s/ John P. Bovich 

John P. Bovich 

Attorneys for Plaintiff And Counterclaim Defendant 

Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company 

DATED: December 29, 2006. 

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI LLP 

By /s/ William H. Manning 

William H. Manning pro hac vice 

Attorneys for Plaintiff And Counterclaim Defendant 

Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company 

DATED: December 29, 2006. 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

By /s/ John F. Feldhaus 

John F. Feldhaus pro hac vice

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimants 

Toshiba Corporation and 

Toshiba America Information Systems 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 24 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 24 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ______________________. 

 The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel 

United States District Judge 

pages 1-23 /MHP 01/03/07

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 25 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 25 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

CERTIFICATION 

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained by the above 

named signatories. 

DATED: December 29, 2006. 

REED SMITH LLP 

By /s/ John P. Bovich 

John P. Bovich 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant 

Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 26 of 27
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

No.: C 06-04018 MHP – 26 – DOCSSFO-12463893.1-JBOVICH 

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Exhibit A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT 

TO BE BOUND BY PROTECTIVE ORDER 

I, ___________________________, state: 

1. I reside at 

 . 

2. My present employer is ,

located at .

3. My present occupation or job description is 

 . 

4. I agree to keep confidential all information provided to me in the matter of Intergraph 

Hardware Technologies Company, v. Toshiba Corp., et. al., Civil Action No. 3:06-cv-04018 (N.D. 

Cal.), and to be subject to the authority of the United States District Court for the Northern District 

of California in the event of any violation of this agreement or dispute related to this agreement. 

5. I have been informed of and read the Protective Order (“Order”) dated [___], and understand 

its contents and confidentiality requirements. I will not divulge any confidential information to 

persons other than those specifically authorized by said Order. 

6. I state under penalty of perjury, under the laws of Delaware and the United States, that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

Signed______________________________, 

Executed on _________________, 20__. 

Case 3:06-cv-04018-MHP Document 59 Filed 01/04/07 Page 27 of 27