Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00880/USCOURTS-caed-1_13-cv-00880-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Clifford Smith (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action currently proceeds on Plaintiff’s 

first amended complaint against Defendants Green, Wilson and Rohrdanz for deliberate indifference 

to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 

On December 28, 2015, Defendants filed a combined motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 56. (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion 

for summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir.2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 

952, 957 (9th Cir.1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411–12 (9th Cir.1988). (ECF No. 24-

7.) Plaintiff’s opposition was due within twenty-one (21) days of service of Defendants’ motion. 

CLIFFORD SMITH,

 Plaintiff,

v.

GREEN, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00880-DAD-BAM (PC)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

(ECF No. 24)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

Case 1:13-cv-00880-DAD-BAM Document 26 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

More than that time has passed, but Plaintiff has not filed opposition or statement of non-opposition to 

the motion. Plaintiff has also made no other communications with the Court.

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a 

statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion within thirty (30) days. Plaintiff is warned that 

the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for 

failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 26, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:13-cv-00880-DAD-BAM Document 26 Filed 02/26/16 Page 2 of 2