Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00798/USCOURTS-cand-4_15-cv-00798-109/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 470
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Cause of Action: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOOP AI LABS INC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANNA GATTI, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR)

ORDER RE STATEMENT REGARDING 

PLAINTIFF'S DOCUMENT

PRODUCTION AND MEET AND 

CONFER CALL TRANSCRIPTIONS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 813, 815

The court has received the Almawave Defendants’ statement identifying documents that it 

contends Plaintiff Loop AI Labs Inc. did not produce or make available to Defendants prior to 

April 8, 2016 but cited in support of its opposition to the Almawave Defendants’ motion for 

summary judgment. [Docket No. 815; see also Docket No. 778 (July 4, 2016 Order).] The 

Almawave Defendants attached a 20-page chart listing the documents in question. [Docket No. 

815-1 (the “chart”).]

By no later than July 18, 2016, Plaintiff shall file a statement identifying where in its 

opposition brief Plaintiff cited the documents listed on the Almawave Defendants’ chart. If 

Plaintiff contends that it produced any of the documents at issue by April 8, 2016, it shall state the 

date on which it produced or made available to the Almawave Defendants each such document 

and submit evidence supporting its assertions. If Plaintiff agrees that it did not produce or make 

available by April 8, 2016 any of the documents listed on the chart, it shall explain why it did not 

produce the document[s] by April 8, 2016.

By no later than July 18, 2016, the Almawave Defendants shall file a statement identifying 

where in Plaintiff’s opposition brief Plaintiff cited the documents listed on the chart. The 

Almawave Defendants shall also provide evidence supporting their assertions about the particular 

dates on which the documents were produced or made available by Plaintiff, and evidence 

Case 4:15-cv-00798-HSG Document 826 Filed 07/13/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

supporting their claim that certain documents were never produced by Plaintiff.

The court has also received Defendant Almawave USA, Inc.’s (“Almawave”) Notice of 

Filing of the Transcriptions of the Meet and Confer Calls pursuant to the court’s July 4, 2016 

order (Docket No. 775), as well as Plaintiff’s objections thereto and Almawave’s response to the 

objections. [Docket Nos. 813, 819, 822.] By July 15, 2016, the parties shall lodge the recordings 

of the entire May 27, 2016 and June 3, 2016 meet and confer calls for the court’s review.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 13, 2016

______________________________________

Donna M. Ryu

U

United States Magistrate Judge

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:15-cv-00798-HSG Document 826 Filed 07/13/16 Page 2 of 2