Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03707/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-03707-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Trademark Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CASE NO.: 15-CV-03707-WHO

HAROLD H. DAVIS, JR. (SBN 235552)

harold.davis@klgates.com

SHARONI S. FINKELSTEIN (SBN 271829)

sharoni.finkelstein@klgates.com

SETH A. GOLD (SBN 163220)

seth.gold@klgates.com

CHRISTINA N. GOODRICH (SBN 261722)

christina.goodrich@klgates.com

K&L GATES LLP

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200

San Francisco, California 94111

Tel: (415) 882-8200

Fax: (415) 882-8220

Attorneys for Defendants CYBERLINK CORP., 

PERFECT CORP. (CALIFORNIA), PERFECT 

CORP. (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

Otto O. Lee, CA Bar No. 173987

olee@iplg.com

Kevin Viau, CA Bar No. 275556

kviau@iplg.com

Bonnie J. Wolf, CA Bar No. 284872

bonniewolf@iplg.com

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP

12 South First Street, 12th Floor

San Jose, California 95113

Tel: (408) 286-8933

Fax: (408) 286-8932

Attorneys for Plaintiff ARCSOFT INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARCSOFT INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CYBERLINK CORP., a Taiwan, R.O.C. 

corporation, PERFECT CORP., a California 

corporation, and PERFECT CORP., a Cayman 

Islands corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-CV-03707-WHO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

FILE REPLY RE: ARCSOFT’S 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION; 

ORDER

Case 3:15-cv-03707-WHO Document 48 Filed 11/19/15 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CASE NO.: 15-CV-03707-WHO

STIPULATION

Per L. R. 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Arcsoft Inc. (“Arcsoft”) and Defendants Cyberlink Corp., 

Perfect Corp. (California), and Perfect Corp. (Cayman Islands) (collectively “Defendants” and, 

together with Arcsoft, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court, 

and jointly submit this Stipulation as follows:

1. On September 1, 2015, Arcsoft filed its Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Dkt. # 10-

16] and supporting materials (collectively, the “Motion”).

2. The Parties previously stipulated, and the Court ordered, that Defendants’ deadline to 

file an opposition to the Motion would be extended from September 15, 2015 to November 10, 2015.

3. Pursuant thereto, Defendants filed their opposition to the Motion along with numerous 

supporting papers on November 10, 2015, rendering Arcsoft’s reply papers due November 24, 2015.

4. Arcsoft’s senior attorney, Otto O. Lee, Esq., is presently out of the country on business 

and personal affairs, and will not be returning to work in the United States until November 23, 2015.

5. On November 16, 2015, the Court postponed the hearing on Arcsoft’s Motion from 

December 9, 2015 to December 16, 2015.

6. Given the foregoing and in consideration of the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday, the 

Parties have agreed and hereby stipulate that the deadline for Arcsoft to file its reply brief in support 

of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be moved from November 24, 2015 to December 1, 

2015.

7. This is Arcsoft’s first request for an extension regarding the filing of its reply brief.

The stipulated extension shall not affect any other case date or deadline, including the December 16, 

2015 hearing of Arcsoft’s Motion – Arcsoft’s reply is to be filed 15 days prior to said hearing, which 

accords with ordinary motion scheduling under L.R. 7.

Case 3:15-cv-03707-WHO Document 48 Filed 11/19/15 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CASE NO.: 15-CV-03707-WHO

Now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the 

Court, that:

A. Arcsoft’s time to file a reply brief in support of its Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is 

moved to on or before December 1, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

Dated: November 17, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kevin Viau /s/ Harold H. Davis

Otto O. Lee

Kevin Viau

Bonnie J. Wolf 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP

12 South First Street, 12th Floor

San Jose, California 95113

Tel: (408) 286-8933

Fax: (408) 286-8932

Attorneys for Plaintiff Arcsoft Inc.

Harold H. Davis

Sharoni S. Finkelstein

Seth A. Gold

Christina N. Goodrich

K&L GATES LLP

4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200

San Francisco, CA 94111

Tel: (415) 882-8200

Fax: (415) 882-8220

Attorneys for Defendants Cyberlink Corp., 

Perfect Corp. (California), Perfect Corp. 

(Cayman Islands)

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I hereby attest pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1 that concurrence in the electronic filing of this 

document has been obtained from the other signatory. 

 Dated: November 17, 2015 /s/ Kevin Viau

Kevin Viau

Case 3:15-cv-03707-WHO Document 48 Filed 11/19/15 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CASE NO.: 15-CV-03707-WHO

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 19, 2015 _______________________________________

The Honorable William H. Orrick

Judge of the U.S. District Court

Case 3:15-cv-03707-WHO Document 48 Filed 11/19/15 Page 4 of 4