Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02921/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-02921-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)

JENNIFER L. STENEBERG (State Bar No. 202985)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A Professional Law Corporation

2806 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: 415/674-8600

Facsimile: 415/674-9900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

PATRICK CONNALLY 

and DISABILITY RIGHTS 

ENFORCEMENT, EDUCATION 

SERVICES: HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PATRICK CONNALLY, an individual; and

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES:HELPING YOU

HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PEKING PALACE; MONTECITO

MARKET PLACE ASSOCIATION,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C04-2921 MEJ

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this

action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the

Mutual Settlement Agreement and Release (“Agreement”), each party is to bear its own costs and

attorneys’ fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over

enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994)

(empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements).

ORDER CLOSING FILE ;

Case 3:04-cv-02921-MEJ Document 27 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through

their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute

one original document.

Dated: May 1, 2006 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: /s/ Jennifer L. Steneberg 

Jennifer L. Steneberg

Attorneys for Plaintiffs PATRICK CONNALLY

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT,

EDUCATION SERVICES

Dated: April 24, 2006 VOGL & MEREDITH

By: /s/ Jean Yeh 

Jean Yeh

Attorneys for Defendant MONTECITO

MARKETPLACE ASSOCIATION

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ Mutual Settlement Agreement and Release should such

enforcement be necessary.

Dated: _____________, 2006

 

Maria-Elena James 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

May 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Maria-Elena James

Case 3:04-cv-02921-MEJ Document 27 Filed 05/03/06 Page 2 of 2