Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03412/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-03412-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

 v.

OSCAR PADILLA,

Defendant. /

No. C 06-03412 JSW

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On May 25, 2006, Plaintiff Daniel Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint and an

application to proceed in forma pauperis. Courts must deny in forma pauperis applications

under certain circumstances, including when the underlying complaint sought to be filed is

frivolous or when it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2). 

On June 7, 2006, the Court denied Plaintiff’ application without prejudice and dismissed

his complaint with leave to amend. On June 23, 2006, the Court denied Plaintiff’s renewed

application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed his amended complaint with leave to

amend. 

Pursuant to that Order, Plaintiff was to file an amended complaint by no later than July

7, 2006. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 

//

//

//
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the matter is HEREBY DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is

directed to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 18, 2006 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE