Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02786/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02786-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 850
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Cause of Action: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-02786 MMC 

-1- Sec 16 Stip re response deadline.doc 

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838 

STEVEN D. GUGGENHEIM, State Bar No. 201386 

CAZ HASHEMI, State Bar No. 210239 

CAMERON HOFFMAN, State Bar No. 229316 

MARK T. OAKES, State Bar No. 234598 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

Email: moakes@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ANDREW E. ROTH, derivatively on behalf of 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC.

Plaintiff, 

v.

GREGORY REYES, MICHAEL BYRD, 

ANTONIO CANOVA, JACK CUTHBERT, and 

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, 

INC.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 3:06-cv-02786 MMC 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING RESPONSE TO 

COMPLAINT 

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 6 Filed 05/16/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-02786 MMC

-2- Sec 16 Stip re response deadline.doc 

WHEREAS, Brocade’s response to the Complaint for Violation of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Complaint”) is currently due May 15, 2006; 

WHEREAS, Brocade wishes to extend the time to respond to the Complaint and plaintiff 

does not object; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, 

subject to the approval of the Court, that the deadline for Brocade to respond to the Complaint 

shall be continued until June 5, 2006.

Dated: May 15, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Mark T. Oakes 

Mark T. Oakes 

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant 

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 

Dated: May 15, 2006 SCHUBERT & REED LLP 

 Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 

 San Francisco, California 94111 

 Telephone: (415) 788-4220 

By: /s/ Willem F. Jonckheer 

Robert C. Schubert 

Willem F. Jonckheer 

Local Counsel for Plaintiff 

 Paul D. Wexler 

 BRAGAR WEXLER & EAGEL, P.C. 

 885 Third Avenue 

 New York, NY 10022 

 Telephone: (212) 308-5858 

 Glenn F. Ostrager 

OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY & 

BROITMAN P.C. 

250 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10177-0899 

 Telephone: (212) 681-0600 

 Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 6 Filed 05/16/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:06-CV-02786 MMC

-3- Sec 16 Stip re response deadline.doc 

ORDER

 Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the deadline for Brocade to 

respond to the Complaint is continued until June 5, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 16, 2006 ________________

 THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-02786-CRB Document 6 Filed 05/16/06 Page 3 of 3