Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00086/USCOURTS-caed-1_05-cv-00086-35/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRYAN E. RANSOM,

Plaintiff,

v.

M. JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00086-OWW-GSA PC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDING AND

RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING

DEFENDANT CABRAL’S MOTION TO

DISMISS, AND DISMISSING EIGHTH

AMENDMENT MEDICAL CARE CLAIM

AGAINST DEFENDANT CABRAL FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST (CLAIM 9)

(Docs. 81 and 122)

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT CABRAL

FROM ACTION

Plaintiff Bryan E. Ransom (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On April 15, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Objection on

May 22, 2008. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

///

Case 1:05-cv-00086-OWW -GSA Document 139 Filed 06/16/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 15, 2008, is adopted in full;

2. Defendant Cabral’s motion to dismiss, filed October 10, 2007, is GRANTED;

3. The Eighth Amendment medical care claim against Defendant Cabral is dismissed,

without prejudice, for failure to exhaust (claim 9); and

4. Defendant Cabral is dismissed from this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00086-OWW -GSA Document 139 Filed 06/16/08 Page 2 of 2