Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01545/USCOURTS-caed-1_07-cv-01545-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES MUCHERU, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

)

v. )

)

)

ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

1:07-cv-01545 LJO-TAG HC 

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 11)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS

(Doc. 1)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ENTER JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

On January 30, 2008, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case filed Findings and

Recommendations recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED for

Petitioner's failure to prosecute. (Doc. 11). The Findings and Recommendations was served on all

parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fifteen days from the date of

service of that order. To date, the parties in this case have not filed timely objections to the Findings

and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the

Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Case 1:07-cv-01545-LJO-TAG Document 13 Filed 03/12/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 30, 2008 (Doc. 11), are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for Respondent and close the

file.

This order terminates the action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 11, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:07-cv-01545-LJO-TAG Document 13 Filed 03/12/08 Page 2 of 2