Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00569/USCOURTS-cand-3_15-cv-00569-10/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 385
Nature of Suit: Property Damage - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

---

STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF COUNTS 44 AND 45;

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00569-EMC

721207579.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO &

KOPCZYNSKI

MICHAEL F. RAM (SBN 104805)

mram@rocklawcal.com

555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 433-4949

Facsimile: (415) 433-7311

[Additional counsel on signature page]

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Proposed Class

MAYER BROWN LLP

CARMINE R. ZARLENGA (D.C. Bar. No.

286244)

Zarlenga@mayerbrown.com

1999 K Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20006-1101

Telephone: (202) 263-3000

Facsimile: (202) 263-3300

MAYER BROWN LLP

DALE J. GIALI (SBN 150382)

KERI E. BORDERS (SBN 194015)

dgiali@mayerbrown.com

kborders@mayerbrown.com

350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 229-9500

Facsimile: (213) 625-0248

Attorneys for Defendant

Nestlé Purina PetCare Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK LUCIDO, et al, on behalf of himself

and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NESTLÉ PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, a

Missouri corporation; and DOES 1 through 200,

inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:15-cv-00569-EMC

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF

COUNTS 44 AND 45 ONLY BY

PLAINTIFF LANCE CARLSON

PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.

41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

Case 3:15-cv-00569-EMC Document 108 Filed 08/10/16 Page 1 of 3
1

STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF COUNTS 44 AND 45;

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00569-EMC

721207579.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff Lance Carlson and Defendant Nestlé Purina

PetCare Company (“Purina”), by and through their respective counsel, that this Court dismiss

Counts 44 and 45 of the Third Amended Complaint only asserted by Lance Carlson against

Purina, with prejudice, pursuant to 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

Dated: August 9, 2016 RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO &

KOPCZYNSKI LLP

Jeffrey B. Cereghino

Michael F. Ram

Matt J. Malone

Susan Brown

MORGAN &MORGAN COMPLEX

LITIGATION GROUP

John Yanchunis

James Young

TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE

PLLC

Beth Terrell

Adrienne Mcentee

PASTOR LAW OFFICE, LLP

David Pastor

LEONARD LAW OFFICE, PC

Preston W. Leonard

FINKELSTEIN, BLANKINSHIP, FREIPEARSON & GARBER, LLP

Todd Garber

Greg Blankinship

CONSUMER LAW GROUP

Alan Mansfield

LACKEY HERSHMAN, L.L.P.

Roger Mandel

GILMAN LAW LLP

Kenneth Gilman

CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA, LLLP

Michael Flannery

THE ANIMAL LAW CENTER

Jennifer R. Edwards

Case 3:15-cv-00569-EMC Document 108 Filed 08/10/16 Page 2 of 3
STIPULATION RE AUTHENTICITY OF CERTAIN LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS;

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00569-EMC

721207579.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE RICHMAN LAW GROUP

Kim Richman

By /s/ Michael F. Ram

Michael F. Ram

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Proposed Class

Dated: August 9, 2016 MAYER BROWN LLP

Carmine R. Zarlenga

Dale J. Giali

Keri E. Borders

By: /s/ Keri E. Borders

Keri E. Borders

Attorneys for Defendant Nestlé Purina Petcare

Company

ATTESTATION

I, Keri E. Borders, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) that

agreement to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory.

By: /s/ Keri E .Borders

Keri E. Borders

Attorneys for Defendant Nestlé Purina Petcare Company

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:15-cv-00569-EMC Document 108 Filed 08/10/16 Page 3 of 3