Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-01392/USCOURTS-casd-3_05-cv-01392-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 830
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

05cv1392-B (BLM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff,

v.

BROADCOM CORPORATION,

Defendant. 

BROADCOM CORPORATION,

Counterclaimant,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Counterdefendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05cv1392-B (BLM)

ORDER (1) GRANTING McANDREWS,

HELD & MALLOY’S MOTION TO QUASH

QUALCOMM’S SUBPOENA FOR

DEPOSITION TESTIMONY [DOC. NO.

405], (2) GRANTING BROADCOM’S

MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE

WITH SUBPOENA TO CETECOM [DOC.

NO. 417], AND (3) SETTING

EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

On November 27, 2006 at 1:30 p.m., the Court heard oral argument on

(1) McAndrews, Held & Malloy’s Motion to Quash Qualcomm’s Subpoena for

Deposition Testimony [Doc. No.405], and (2) Broadcom’s Motion to Compel

Compliance with Subpoena to Cetecom, Inc. [Doc. No. 417]. Appearing for

Plaintiff Qualcomm were Barry Tucker, Dan Kassabian, Paul Rose, and

Katherine Riley. Appearing for both Defendant Broadcom and Non-Party

McAndrews, Held & Malloy was Hank Spuhler. Appearing for Non-Party

Cetecom, Inc. was James Blackburn.

For the reasons stated on the record:

Case 3:05-cv-01392-B-BLM Document 472 Filed 11/28/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 05cv1392-B (BLM)

McAndrews, Held & Malloy’s Motion to Quash Qualcomm’s Subpoena for

Deposition Testimony is GRANTED. Doc. No. 405.

Broadcom’s Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to Cetecom,

Inc. is GRANTED. Doc. No. 417. Broadcom withdrew its motion to compel

Samsung test reports because Cetecom agreed to produce them. Broadcom’s

motion to compel Novatel Wireless, Inc. test reports is GRANTED.

Broadcom’s motion to compel deposition testimony regarding the Cetecom

documents produced to date, as well as the Samsung test reports to be

produced pursuant to this Order is GRANTED.

Finally, the Court addressed the parties’ ongoing concerns with

regard to (1) Qualcomm’s alleged violations of the Court’s discovery

orders and (2) Broadcom’s failure to produce various allegedly

responsive documents. The Court instructed the parties to meet and

confer further in an attempt to resolve these ongoing discovery issues.

However, to the extent that the parties are unable to resolve their

disputes, this Order sets forth a hearing date and briefing schedule for

the parties’ respective motions to compel.

A hearing date of December 14, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. is assigned. The

parties’ respective motions, which shall be limited to one (1) motion

per party of no more than ten (10) pages in length, shall be filed on or

before December 1, 2006. Any oppositions to these motions shall be

limited to no more than ten (10) pages in length, and shall be filed on

or before December 6, 2006. Any replies shall be limited to no more

than five (5) pages in length, and shall be filed on or before December

8, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 28, 2006

BARBARA L. MAJOR

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01392-B-BLM Document 472 Filed 11/28/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 05cv1392-B (BLM)

COPY TO:

HONORABLE RUDI M. BREWSTER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ALL COUNSEL

Case 3:05-cv-01392-B-BLM Document 472 Filed 11/28/06 Page 3 of 3