Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02462/USCOURTS-cand-3_06-cv-02462-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 890
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 8:1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Answer

C06-2462 MHP 1

KEVIN V. RYAN, CSBN 118321

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143

Assistant United States Attorney

Chief, Civil Division

ILA C. DEISS, NY SBN 3052909

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7124

FAX: (415) 436-7169

Attorneys for Respondents

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

HASSAN KANGARLOO, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

DAVID STILL, in his Official Capacity, District )

Director, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, )

Citizenship and Immigration Services, San )

Francisco, California; )

)

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his Official Capacity, )

Secretary, United States Department of )

Homeland Security; )

)

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, in his Official )

Capacity, Attorney General, U.S. Department of )

Justice, )

)

Respondents. )

________________________________________)

No. C 06-2462 MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

Petitioner, by and through his attorney of record, and Respondents, by and through their

attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to the following:

1. On April 7, 2006, petitioner filed a petition for de novo review of his application for

naturalization pursuant. 

2. The respondents filed an answer to the petition on May 7, 2006.

Case 3:06-cv-02462-MHP Document 8 Filed 06/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Answer

C06-2462 MHP 2

3. The parties believe that the case may possibly be resolved administratively. 

4. The parties therefore agree, subject to court approval, to continue the Case Management

Conference currently set for July 10, 2006, to September 11, 2006.

5. The parties further agree, subject to court approval, to file a joint case management

statement seven days in advance of the case management conference, and to file the necessary

Alternative Dispute Resolution documents twenty-one days in advance of the case management

conference. 

Dated: June 19, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

 /s/ 

ILA C. DEISS

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Respondents

Dated: June 19, 2006 /s/ 

MARC VAN DER HOUT

ZACHARY NIGHTINGALE

Attorneys for Petitioner

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Case Management Conference

be continued to September 11, 2006.

DATED: 

MARILYN HALL PATEL

United States District Judge

June 20, 2006

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:06-cv-02462-MHP Document 8 Filed 06/21/06 Page 2 of 2