Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04937/USCOURTS-cand-3_04-cv-04937-3/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

Randolph S. Hicks, Esq. - SBN 83627

Richard G. Grotch, Esq. - SBN 127713

Sarvenaz J. Fahimi, Esq. - SBN 226148

CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH

A Professional Corporation, Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300

Redwood City, California 94065-2133

Tel. (650) 592-5400 

Fax. (650) 592-5027

Email: rgrotch@chdlawyers.com

ATTORNEYS FOR Defendants

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., DAVID MODIC and

CAROLYN ONOGOMUHO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIONEL BEA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., a

California corporation; DAVID M., an

individual; CAROLYN ONOGOMUHO,

an individual; and DOES 1-25,

Defendants.

/

No. C 04-4937 MJJ

REVISED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER

In accordance with this Court’s February 8, 2006 order regarding protective order, the parties

submit the following revised, stipulated protective order.

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure

and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted.

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated

Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on

all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited

information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 1 of 13

Order granting:

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 1 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

confidential. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 10, below, that this Stipulated

Protective Order creates no entitlement to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule

79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied

when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,

consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff).

2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium

or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts,

or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this

matter.

2.3 Confidential Information or Items: information (regardless of how generated, stored

or maintained) or tangible things that properly qualify for protection under standards developed

under F.R.Civ.P. 26(c). Counsel shall not designate any discovery material as “Confidential”

without first making a good faith determination that protection is warranted.

2.4 “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information or Items: extremely

sensitive‚ “Confidential Information” or Items whose disclosure to another Party or non-party would

create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 

2.5 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a

Producing Party.

2.6 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material

in this action.

2.7. Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or items that it

produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential —

Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

2.8 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as

“Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

///

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 2 of 13
 Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 2 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

2.9. Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are retained

to represent or advise a Party in this action.

2.10 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party.

2.11 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well as their

support staffs).

2.12 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to

the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a

consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or of a competitor

of a Party’s and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party

or a competitor of a Party’s. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained

in connection with this litigation.

2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g.,

photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; organizing, storing,

retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and subcontractors.

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material

(as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies,

excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by

parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material.

4. DURATION

Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this

Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order

otherwise directs; the Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Stipulation and Order shall

expire six months after the final termination of this Action.

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or

non-party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit

any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards pursuant to

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 3 of 13
 Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 3 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A Designating Party must take care to designate

for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that

qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which

protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. As noted

above, counsel shall not designate any discovery material as “Confidential” without first making a

good faith determination that protection is warranted.

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown

to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily

encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens

on other parties), expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or items that it designated

for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of protection initially

asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the

mistaken designation.

5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see,

e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that

qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is

disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

(a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions or

other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL”

or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” at the top of each page that

contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for

protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making

appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection

being asserted (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES

ONLY”).

///

///

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 4 of 13
 Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 4 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which

material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of

the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants 

copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof,

qualify for protection under this Order, then, before producing the specified documents, the

Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) at the top of each page that contains Protected

Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the

Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted

(either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”).

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings that

the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, before the close

of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further specify any

portions of the testimony that qualify as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES

ONLY.” When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to

protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection,

the Party or non-party that sponsors, offers, or gives the testimony may invoke on the record (before

the deposition or proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to 20 days to identify the specific

portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being

asserted (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”).

Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 20

days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order.

///

///

///

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 5 of 13
 Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 5 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by the court

reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as instructed by the Party or non-party offering

or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony.

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for any

other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the

container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL”

or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only portions of the

information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify

the protected portions, specifying whether they qualify as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential

– Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to

designate qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’

Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under

this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as “Confidential” or “Highly

Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party,

on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material

is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

6.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s

confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary

economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive

its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly

after the original designation is disclosed.

6.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating Party’s

confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by conferring

directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient) with counsel

forthe Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 6 of 13
 Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 6 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an

opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in

designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A challenging Party may

proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer

process first.

6.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a confidentiality

designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party may file and serve

a motion under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) that

identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. Each such

motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the movant has complied

with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that sets forth with

specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating

Party in the meet and confer dialogue.

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party.

Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the

level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation.

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or

produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,

defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to

the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has

been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 11, below (FINAL

DISPOSITION). Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a

location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under

this Order.

///

///

///

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 7 of 13
 Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 7 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

8

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered

by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any

information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to:

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as

employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this

litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is attached

hereto as Exhibit A;

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the

Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed

the ‚Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order^ (Exhibit A);

(c) experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure

is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by

Protective Order” (Exhibit A);

(d) the Court and its personnel;

(e) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by

Protective Order” (Exhibit A);

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is

reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order”

(Exhibit A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal

Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to

anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order.

(g) the author of the document or the original source of the information.

7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”

Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the

Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:

///

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 8 of 13
 Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 8 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as

employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this

litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” that is attached

hereto as Exhibit A;

(b) Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably

necessary for this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order”

(Exhibit A);

(c) the Court and its personnel;

(d) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and

(e) the author of the document or the original source of the information.

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER

LITIGATION.

If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that

would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the

Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) immediately

and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification

must include a copy of the subpoena or court order.

The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who caused the

subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the

subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must

deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the Party in the other action that

caused the subpoena or order to issue.

The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this

Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its

confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The Designating

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 9 of 13
 Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 9 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

10

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking protection in that court of its confidential

material – and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a

Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order,

the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized

disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the

person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and

(d)request such person or persons to execute the ‚Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound that

is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

10. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL. If a party wishes to file a document that has been

designated “Confidential” by another party pursuant to this protective order, or if a party wishes to

refer in a memorandum or other filing to information so designated by another party, the submitting

party must file and serve an Administrative Motion for a sealing order and lodge the document,

memorandum or other filing in accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5. When lodged, the

“Confidential” material shall be placed in a sealed envelope with instructions that the document is

filed pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order and that the envelope is not to be opened absent

further order of the Court. The envelope should be labeled to identify the title of the case, the case

number and the title of the document. If only a portion of the document, memorandum or other

filing is sealable, the submitting party must also lodge with the Court a redacted version of the

document, memorandum or other filing to be placed in the public record if the Court approves the

requested sealing order. Within five days thereafter, the designating party must file with the Court

and serve a declaration establishing that the designated information is sealable, and must lodge and

serve a narrowly tailored proposed sealing order, or must withdraw the designation of

confidentiality. If the designating party does not file its responsive declaration as required by this

subsection, the document or proposed filing will be made part of the public record. If a request to

file under seal is denied in part or in full, neither the lodged document nor any proposed redacted

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 10 of 13
 Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 10 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

version will be filed. The Clerk will notify the submitting party, hold the lodged document for three

days for the submitting party to retrieve it, and thereafter, if it is not retrieved, dispose of it. If the

request is denied in full, the submitting party may retain the document and not make it part of the

record in the case, or, within three days, re-submit the document for filing in the public record. If

the request is denied in part and granted in part, the party may resubmit the document in a manner

that conforms to the Court’s order and Civil Local Rule 79-5.

11. FINAL DISPOSITION. Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing

Party, within sixty days after the final termination of this action, each Receiving Party must return

all Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material”

includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing

any of the Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating Party, the Receiving

Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether the

Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification

to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty

day deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was

returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts,

compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material.

Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings,

motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if such

materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected

Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION), above.

12. MISCELLANEOUS

12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek

its modification by the Court in the future.

///

///

///

///

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 11 of 13
 Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 11 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order

no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any

information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no

Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by

this Protective Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February 9, 2006 TAYLOR & GOINS LLP

/s/

By:__________________________________

 Vernon C. Goins II

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 Lionel Bea

Dated: February 9, 2006 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH

/s/

By:__________________________________

 Richard G. Grotch

 Attorneys for Defendants

 Southwest Airlines Co., David Modic and

 Carolyn Onogomuho

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February __, 2006

________________________________

Honorable Martin J. Jenkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 12 of 13

16

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 12 of 13
CODDINGTON, HICKS 

& DANFORTH

A Professional Corp., Lawyers

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

13

Revised Stipulated Protective Order – C 04-4937 MJJ

EXHIBIT A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

I, _____________________________ , of _________________ [print or type full address],

declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated

Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of

California on February ___, 2006, in the case of Lionel Bea v. Southwest Airlines Co., et al., United

States District Court, Northern District of California, No. C 04-4937 MJJ. I agree to comply with

and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and

acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature

of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that

is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with

the provisions of this Order.

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the

Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective

Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. I hereby appoint

______________________ of _______________________________________ [print or type full

address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this

action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.

Dated: _________________________________

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________

Printed name: ______________________________

Signature: __________________________________

Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 43 Filed 02/11/2006 Page 13 of 13
 Case 3:04-cv-04937-MJJ Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 13 of 13