Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02781/USCOURTS-cand-3_05-cv-02781-4/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 840
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

---

1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME OF ADR AND DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

C05-02781 MJJ 123246 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

NASSER HAMEDANI, an individual 

doing business as GLOBAL VISION 

UNLIMITED, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BAYER CORPORATION, an Indiana 

corporation, BAYER HEALTHCARE 

LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability 

Company, 

Defendants. 

 Case No.: C05-02781 MJJ 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CHANGING TIME OF ADR AND 

DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

Courtroom: 11 

Judge: Honorable Martin J. Jenkins 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned 

counsel of record for Plaintiff Nasser Hamedani (“Hamedani”) and Defendants Bayer 

Corporation and Bayer Healthcare LLC (collectively, “Bayer”), that the there is good cause to 

continue the ADR and discovery deadlines as set forth herein. 

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), the undersigned counsel of record declare that: 

(1) On March 1, 2006, Defendants served their first set of written discovery requests 

to Plaintiff. Plaintiff responded to Defendants’ written discovery requests on May 1, 2006. On 

March 7, 2006, Plaintiff served his first set of written discovery requests to Defendants. 

Defendants responded to Plaintiff’s written discovery requests on June 8, 2006. Counsel for the 

parties have had several discussions about deposition dates. Currently, Plaintiff and Defendants 

plan to depose three witnesses each prior to engaging in mediation. All six depositions are 

tentatively planned to take place in August, 2006. Due to scheduling conflicts that caused minor 

delays in the depositions and discovery, the parties request some additional time to complete 

discovery and an additional 20 days to prepare for the Court-sponsored Mediation. 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 40 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 41 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 3
2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME OF ADR AND DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

C05-02781 MJJ 123246 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(2) On November 10, 2005, the Court initially set the deadline for Mediation on May 

31, 2006. Pursuant to a stipulation by the parties on April 11, 2006, the Court continued the 

Mediation deadline to August 31, 2006. The parties request an additional 20 days to conclude 

the Mediation. The discovery schedule was first set by the Court’s Pretrial Order of March 7, 

2006. 

(3) This is the parties’ first request to modify the discovery schedule. The requested 

changes will not impact the trial date, the settlement conference date, or the date by which 

dispositive motions must be heard. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 40 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 2 of 3
 Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 41 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 3
3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME OF ADR AND DISCOVERY DEADLINES 

C05-02781 MJJ 123246 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties stipulate to and request an order changing the 

following deadlines: 

(a) The deadline for the Mediation will be September 20, 2006. 

(b) Non-expert Discovery cutoff will be November 17, 2006. 

(c) Designation of Experts will be due by October 30, 2006. 

(d) Expert Reports will be due by November 6, 2006. 

(e) Designation of Supplemental/Rebuttal Experts will be due by December 4, 2006. 

(f) Supplemental/Rebuttal Reports will be due by December 4, 2006. 

(g) Expert discovery cutoff will be December 22, 2006. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: July 13, 2006 

 

/s/ Patrick E Guevara____________________ 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

MCNICHOLS RANDICK O’DEA & TOOLIATOS LLP 

Everitt G. Beers 

Kevin R. Martin 

Patrick E. Guevara 

Dated: July 13, 2006 

 

/s/ Danielle B. Lemack__________________ 

Attorneys for Defendants 

GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP 

Clement L. Glynn 

PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD 

& GERALDSON LLP 

Raymond I. Geraldson, Jr. 

Thad Chaloemtiarana 

Danielle B. Lemack 

Angela K. Steele 

THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS 

APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________________ ________________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 40 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 3 of 3

July 18, 2006

Case 3:05-cv-02781-MJJ Document 41 Filed 07/18/06 Page 3 of 3