Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06536/USCOURTS-caed-1_02-cv-06536-1/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1The court notes that the copy of the findings and recommendations served on Petitioner was returned by

the United States Postal Service with the notation “unable to forward.” The copy, however, was served on Petitioner

at his address of record and pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(e) such service is fully effective. 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN DALE HERRING, )

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. )

)

)

L. R. BLANKS, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

CV F 02 6536 OWW WMW HC

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION 

(Document 27)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On August 2, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that the

petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED. These Findings and Recommendation were

served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within ten days of

the date of service of the order. Over ten days have passed and no party has filed objections.1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds that the

Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 

Case 1:02-cv-06536-OWW -WMW Document 29 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued August 2, 2005, are ADOPTED IN

FULL; 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Respondent and to close

this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2005 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger 

emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cv-06536-OWW -WMW Document 29 Filed 09/26/05 Page 2 of 2