Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02369/USCOURTS-caed-2_13-cv-02369-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANERAE V. BROWN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

P. MARTINEZ et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:13-cv-2369-GEB-EFB P (TEMP) 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

 On September 16, 2015, the assigned district judge in this case adopted then-Magistrate 

Judge Dale A. Drozd’s findings and recommendations in full and granted defendants’ motions to 

dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim. ECF Nos. 43, 45. The court also granted 

plaintiff thirty days leave to file a supplemental complaint for the limited purpose of curing the 

deficiency of his due process claim against defendants. That thirty-day period has now expired, 

and plaintiff has not filed his supplemental complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

Case 2:13-cv-02369-GEB-EFB Document 47 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 

appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: November 13, 2015. 

Case 2:13-cv-02369-GEB-EFB Document 47 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 2