Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-04357/USCOURTS-cand-4_04-cv-04357-8/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 893
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:9607 Real Property Tort to Land

---

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

NOT FOR CITATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALENTI AGGIO, et al., 

Plaintiffs, No. C 04-4357 PJH

v. ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE

ESTATE OF JOSEPH AGGIO, 

Defendant.

_________________________________

AND RELATED THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS

_________________________________/

The court has reviewed the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the

defendant’s motion for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and request for stay, and

finds the motion to be appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the date

for the hearing on the motion, previously set for Wednesday, January 4, 2006, is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2005

______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-04357-PJH Document 77 Filed 12/16/05 Page 1 of 4
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

NOT FOR CITATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALENTI AGGIO, et al., 

Plaintiffs, No. C 04-4357 PJH

v. ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE

ESTATE OF JOSEPH AGGIO, 

Defendant.

_________________________________

AND RELATED THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS

_________________________________/

The court has reviewed the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the

defendant’s motion for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and request for stay, and

finds the motion to be appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the date

for the hearing on the motion, previously set for Wednesday, January 4, 2006, is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2005

______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-04357-PJH Document 77 Filed 12/16/05 Page 2 of 4
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

NOT FOR CITATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALENTI AGGIO, et al., 

Plaintiffs, No. C 04-4357 PJH

v. ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE

ESTATE OF JOSEPH AGGIO, 

Defendant.

_________________________________

AND RELATED THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS

_________________________________/

The court has reviewed the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the

defendant’s motion for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and request for stay, and

finds the motion to be appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the date

for the hearing on the motion, previously set for Wednesday, January 4, 2006, is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2005

______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-04357-PJH Document 77 Filed 12/16/05 Page 3 of 4
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

NOT FOR CITATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALENTI AGGIO, et al., 

Plaintiffs, No. C 04-4357 PJH

v. ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE

ESTATE OF JOSEPH AGGIO, 

Defendant.

_________________________________

AND RELATED THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS

_________________________________/

The court has reviewed the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the

defendant’s motion for certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and request for stay, and

finds the motion to be appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the date

for the hearing on the motion, previously set for Wednesday, January 4, 2006, is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2005

______________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-04357-PJH Document 77 Filed 12/16/05 Page 4 of 4