Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03493/USCOURTS-cand-3_12-cv-03493-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 791
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

---

Page 1

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 

Case No. C12 03493 MEJ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CHARLES B. PERKINS #126942

FLYNN, ROSE & PERKINS

59 North Santa Cruz Avenue, Suite Q

Los Gatos, California 95030

(408) 399-4566

Email: cbperk@earthlink.net

Attorney for Plaintiff

KANDY QUIGG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KANDY QUIGG,

Plaintiff,

vs.

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C12 03493 MEJ

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

THEREON 

)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, Plaintiff, 

KANDY QUIGG and Defendant, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

through their respective attorneys of record, that the above-entitled action, and all claims for

relief thereon, shall be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a), subject to the Settlement and Release Agreement entered into between the parties, with 

neither party to make a claim for fees or costs based on the Dismissal. 

DATE: December 27, 2012 FLYNN, ROSE & PERKINS

By /s/ Charles B. Perkins

 CHARLES B. PERKINS

Attorney for Plaintiff, K. QUIGG 

Case 3:12-cv-03493-MEJ Document 14 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 2
Page 2

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 

Case No. C12 03493 MEJ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

DATE: December 27, 2012 SEDGWICK LLP

By __/s/ Rebecca A. Hull

 REBECCA A. HULL

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company 

 

ORDER

Having reviewed the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice, with neither 

party to make a claim for fees or costs based on this Dismissal. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: HON. MARIA-ELENA JAMES

DIST. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

January 2, 2013

Case 3:12-cv-03493-MEJ Document 14 Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 2