Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-casd-3_14-cv-02066/USCOURTS-casd-3_14-cv-02066-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 365
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury - Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: INCRETIN-BASED

THERAPIES PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION

_______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Lead Case No. 13md2452 AJB (MDD)

ORDER REMANDING CASES 

Briggs, Case No. 14cv1677 AJB (MDD)

Kelly, Case No. 14cv2066 AJB (MDD)

Johnson, Case No. 14cv2070 AJB (MDD)

Martinez, Case No. 14cv2071 AJB (MDD)

Kries, Case No. 14cv2072 AJB (MDD)

On August 6, 2015, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion reversing this Court’s prior

order denying the plaintiffs’ motions to remand to state court. In accordance with the

Ninth Circuit’s opinion and mandate, plaintiffs motions to remand are GRANTED and

the above-referenced cases are REMANDED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: September 1, 2015

Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia

U.S. District Judge

1 14cv1677 AJB (MDD)

Case 3:14-cv-02066-AJB-MDD Document 53 Filed 09/01/15 Page 1 of 1