Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00757/USCOURTS-caed-1_12-cv-00757-15/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS V. RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

CDCR DEPARTMENT OF REVIEW 

BOARD, et al.,

Defendant(s).

1:12-cv-00757 AWI JLT (PC)

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION 

TO DISMISS WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS 

(Doc. 52)

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. '

1983. The events giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred in 2009 at Kern Valley State Prison. 

On April 30, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, 

qualified immunity, and asserting that this action is barred under Heck and Balisok. (Doc. 52.) 

On May 7, 2014, a second informational order issued advising Plaintiff of the requirements to 

oppose a motion to dismiss and directing Plaintiff to file an opposition or a statement of nonopposition within twenty-one days. (Doc. 53.) More than 21 days have passed and Plaintiff has 

not filed an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l). 

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff SHALL file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion 

within 21 days from the date of service of this order; and

Case 1:12-cv-00757-DAD-JLT Document 55 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal 

of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:12-cv-00757-DAD-JLT Document 55 Filed 06/10/14 Page 2 of 2