Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01758/USCOURTS-caed-1_06-cv-01758-2/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEE EDWARD PEYTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

PAT L. VASQUEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01758-OWW-LJO PC

ORDER STRIKING SUBPOENAS FILED BY

PLAINTIFF FROM RECORD

(Doc. 9)

On January 23, 2007, plaintiff filed a subpoena duces tecum and a subpoena ad

testificandum. Plaintiff’s subpoenas, which are on California Judicial Council forms, are premature,

as discovery is not yet open and this matter is not set for hearing or trial. If this matter reaches a

juncture at which the issuance of any type of subpoena is necessary, the court will direct the Clerk’s

Office to issue the subpoena(s) by order. At this time, plaintiff has not yet been granted leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and his complaint has not been screened by the court and found to state

cognizable claims under federal law. Until (1) plaintiff either pays the filing fee in full or files a

completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, and (2) plaintiff’s complaint is screened and

found to state a claim for relief under federal law, no subpoenas will issue. 

///

///

///

///

///

Case 1:06-cv-01758-OWW -GSA Document 10 Filed 01/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Based on the foregoing, plaintiff’s subpoenas are HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from

the record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 30, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 

b9ed48 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-01758-OWW -GSA Document 10 Filed 01/30/07 Page 2 of 2