Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01783/USCOURTS-azd-2_04-cv-01783-0/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 530
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Daniel Eaton Wildes, Jr., 

Petitioner, 

v.

Dora Schriro; Arizona Attorney General, 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-04-1783-PHX-DGC (DKD)

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Petitioner Daniel Eaton Wildes, Jr.’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus and United States Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan’s Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”). Dkt. ##1, 33. The R&R recommends that the petition be denied

and dismissed with prejudice. Dkt. #33 at 12. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that

they had ten days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could

be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 12 (citing 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.

2003)). In addition, Petitioner was granted an extension to March 2, 2007 to file objections

to the R&R. Dkt. 35.

The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review

the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)

(“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the

subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (“The district judge . . . shall make a de novo

determination . . . of any portion of the magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific

Case 2:04-cv-01783-DGC Document 36 Filed 03/14/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

written objection has been made[.]”). The Court will accept the R&R and the Petition will

be denied and dismissed with prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district

court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations

made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (same).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan’s R&R (Dkt. #33) is accepted.

2. Petitioner Daniel Eaton Wildes’ petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. #1)

is denied and dismissed with prejudice.

3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.

DATED this 14th day of March, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-01783-DGC Document 36 Filed 03/14/07 Page 2 of 2