Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02488/USCOURTS-caed-2_02-cv-02488-5/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 440
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

184962.1 -1- 

WILKE,FLEURY,HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAC RAMENTO NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 

ROBERT F. TYLER (SBN 063055) 

400 Capitol Mall, Twenty-Second Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 441-2430 

Facsimile: (916) 442-6664 

Attorneys for Defendants 

JUDITH JOHNSON, R.N., CHERYL PAIZIS, D.O., 

HENRY ISHIBASHI, LCSW, and NANCY HARNETT, 

MSW 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Estate of MOHAMMAD REZA 

ABDOLLAHI, deceased, by and through 

SINA ABDOLLAHI (a minor through his 

mother and guardian ad litem Parvin 

Ganji), as successor in interest; SINA 

ABDOLLAHI, Individually, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; 

Sacramento County Sheriff's Department 

Sheriff LOU BLANAS; Sacramento 

County Sheriff's Department Captain JIM 

COOPER; Sacramento County Sheriff’s 

Department Deputy THOMAS MANTEI; 

JUDITH JOHNSON; CHERYL PAIGIS; 

and Does I through XXX, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

No. CIV.S - 02-2488 FCD JFM 

(Consolidated Cases) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT CHERYL PAIZIS, D.O. 

Second Amended Consolidated 

Complaint Filed: July 15, 2005 

Trial Date: June 6, 2006 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BETWEEN THE ABDOLLAHI 

PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT CHERYL PAIZIS, D.O. AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiffs herein have agreed to dismiss their claims against Defendant Cheryl 

Paizis, D.O. with prejudice; and 

2. Defendant Cheryl Paizis, D.O. has agreed in return to waive any claims she may 

otherwise have for recovery of her costs of suit herein. 

Case 2:02-cv-02488-FCD-JFM Document 126 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

184962.1 -2- 

WILKE,FLEURY,HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAC RAMENTO NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

DATED: October 24, 2005 WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, 

GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 

By: //ROBERT F. TYLER// 

ROBERT F. TYLER 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

JUDITH JOHNSON, R.N., and CHERYL 

PAIZIS, D.O. 

DATED: October 17, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ 

By: //STEWART KATZ// 

STEWART KATZ 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

JULIEN PROVENCHER, SR., Individually; 

JEAN THURSTON, Individually 

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is hereby 

ordered that the Plaintiff Abdollahis’ various claims against Defendant Cheryl Paizis, D.O., and 

each of them, are hereby dismissed. 

Dated: October 25, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

 Frank C. Damrell, Jr. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:02-cv-02488-FCD-JFM Document 126 Filed 10/26/05 Page 2 of 2