Source: s3://data.kl3m.ai/documents/govinfo/USCOURTS/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-05192/USCOURTS-caed-1_01-cv-05192-17/pdf.json

Nature of Suit Code: 550
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

---

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY BUFORD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WASCO STATE PRISON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

1:01-cv-05192-AWI-SMS-P

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 161)

ORDER SANCTIONING PLAINTIFF

$250.00 FOR ACTING IN BAD

FAITH, DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. 147)

Plaintiff Timothy Buford (“plaintiff”) is a prisoner

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to

a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On September 14, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. 

On November 13, 2006, plaintiff filed an objection to the

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

///

Case 1:01-cv-05192-SMS Document 165 Filed 01/11/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 14,

2006, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Plaintiff is sanctioned in the amount of $250.00 for

acting in bad faith in filing the motion to amend on November 14,

2005;

3. The monetary sanction be made payable to the United

States District Court for the Eastern District of California and

be remitted within thirty (30) days from the date of service of

this order; and,

4. This action will be dismissed if plaintiff fails to

comply with the order and remit the monetary sanction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2007 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 

0m8i78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:01-cv-05192-SMS Document 165 Filed 01/11/07 Page 2 of 2